Context stringlengths 227 76.5k | target stringlengths 0 11.6k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 16 3.69k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Adjoin.FG
/-!
# Adjoining elements and being finitely generated in an algebra tower
## Main results
* `Algebra.fg_trans'`: if `S` is finitely generated as `R`-algebra and `A` as `S`-algebra,
then `A` is finitely generated as `R`-algebra
* `fg_of_fg_of_fg`: **Artin--Tate lemma**: if C/B/A is a tower of rings, and A is noetherian, and
C is algebra-finite over A, and C is module-finite over B, then B is algebra-finite over A.
-/
open Pointwise
universe u v w u₁
variable (R : Type u) (S : Type v) (A : Type w) (B : Type u₁)
namespace Algebra
theorem adjoin_restrictScalars (C D E : Type*) [CommSemiring C] [CommSemiring D] [CommSemiring E]
[Algebra C D] [Algebra C E] [Algebra D E] [IsScalarTower C D E] (S : Set E) :
| (Algebra.adjoin D S).restrictScalars C =
(Algebra.adjoin ((⊤ : Subalgebra C D).map (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom C D E)) S).restrictScalars
C := by
suffices
Set.range (algebraMap D E) =
Set.range (algebraMap ((⊤ : Subalgebra C D).map (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom C D E)) E) by
ext x
change x ∈ Subsemiring.closure (_ ∪ S) ↔ x ∈ Subsemiring.closure (_ ∪ S)
rw [this]
ext x
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
exact ⟨⟨algebraMap D E y, ⟨y, ⟨Algebra.mem_top, rfl⟩⟩⟩, hy⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨y, ⟨z, ⟨h0, h1⟩⟩⟩, h2⟩
exact ⟨z, Eq.trans h1 h2⟩
theorem adjoin_res_eq_adjoin_res (C D E F : Type*) [CommSemiring C] [CommSemiring D]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Adjoin/Tower.lean | 30 | 46 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot, Yury Kudryashov, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Defs
/-!
# Intervals
In any preorder, we define intervals (which on each side can be either infinite, open or closed)
using the following naming conventions:
- `i`: infinite
- `o`: open
- `c`: closed
Each interval has the name `I` + letter for left side + letter for right side.
For instance, `Ioc a b` denotes the interval `(a, b]`.
The definitions can be found in `Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Defs`.
This file contains basic facts on inclusion of and set operations on intervals
(where the precise statements depend on the order's properties;
statements requiring `LinearOrder` are in `Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.LinearOrder`).
TODO: This is just the beginning; a lot of rules are missing
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Set
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c x : α}
instance decidableMemIoo [Decidable (a < x ∧ x < b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ioo a b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIco [Decidable (a ≤ x ∧ x < b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ico a b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIio [Decidable (x < b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Iio b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIcc [Decidable (a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Icc a b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIic [Decidable (x ≤ b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Iic b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIoc [Decidable (a < x ∧ x ≤ b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ioc a b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIci [Decidable (a ≤ x)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ici a) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIoi [Decidable (a < x)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ioi a) := by assumption
theorem left_mem_Ioo : a ∈ Ioo a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
theorem left_mem_Ico : a ∈ Ico a b ↔ a < b := by simp [le_refl]
theorem left_mem_Icc : a ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp [le_refl]
theorem left_mem_Ioc : a ∈ Ioc a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
theorem left_mem_Ici : a ∈ Ici a := by simp
theorem right_mem_Ioo : b ∈ Ioo a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
theorem right_mem_Ico : b ∈ Ico a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
theorem right_mem_Icc : b ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp [le_refl]
theorem right_mem_Ioc : b ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < b := by simp [le_refl]
theorem right_mem_Iic : a ∈ Iic a := by simp
@[simp]
theorem Ici_toDual : Ici (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Iic a :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Ici := Ici_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Iic_toDual : Iic (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ici a :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Iic := Iic_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_toDual : Ioi (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Iio a :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Ioi := Ioi_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Iio_toDual : Iio (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ioi a :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Iio := Iio_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Icc_toDual : Icc (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Icc b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Icc := Icc_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_toDual : Ioc (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ico b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Ioc := Ioc_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Ico_toDual : Ico (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ioc b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Ico := Ico_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_toDual : Ioo (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ioo b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Ioo := Ioo_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Ici_ofDual {x : αᵒᵈ} : Ici (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Iic x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Iic_ofDual {x : αᵒᵈ} : Iic (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Ici x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_ofDual {x : αᵒᵈ} : Ioi (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Iio x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Iio_ofDual {x : αᵒᵈ} : Iio (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Ioi x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Icc_ofDual {x y : αᵒᵈ} : Icc (ofDual y) (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Icc x y :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[simp]
theorem Ico_ofDual {x y : αᵒᵈ} : Ico (ofDual y) (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Ioc x y :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_ofDual {x y : αᵒᵈ} : Ioc (ofDual y) (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Ico x y :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_ofDual {x y : αᵒᵈ} : Ioo (ofDual y) (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Ioo x y :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Icc : (Icc a b).Nonempty ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx.1.trans hx.2, fun h => ⟨a, left_mem_Icc.2 h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ico : (Ico a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx.1.trans_lt hx.2, fun h => ⟨a, left_mem_Ico.2 h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioc : (Ioc a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx.1.trans_le hx.2, fun h => ⟨b, right_mem_Ioc.2 h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ici : (Ici a).Nonempty :=
⟨a, left_mem_Ici⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Iic : (Iic a).Nonempty :=
⟨a, right_mem_Iic⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioo [DenselyOrdered α] : (Ioo a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ha, hb⟩ => ha.trans hb, exists_between⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioi [NoMaxOrder α] : (Ioi a).Nonempty :=
exists_gt a
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Iio [NoMinOrder α] : (Iio a).Nonempty :=
exists_lt a
theorem nonempty_Icc_subtype (h : a ≤ b) : Nonempty (Icc a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Icc.mpr h)
theorem nonempty_Ico_subtype (h : a < b) : Nonempty (Ico a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Ico.mpr h)
theorem nonempty_Ioc_subtype (h : a < b) : Nonempty (Ioc a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Ioc.mpr h)
/-- An interval `Ici a` is nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Ici_subtype : Nonempty (Ici a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Ici
/-- An interval `Iic a` is nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Iic_subtype : Nonempty (Iic a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Iic
theorem nonempty_Ioo_subtype [DenselyOrdered α] (h : a < b) : Nonempty (Ioo a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Ioo.mpr h)
/-- In an order without maximal elements, the intervals `Ioi` are nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Ioi_subtype [NoMaxOrder α] : Nonempty (Ioi a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Ioi
/-- In an order without minimal elements, the intervals `Iio` are nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Iio_subtype [NoMinOrder α] : Nonempty (Iio a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Iio
instance [NoMinOrder α] : NoMinOrder (Iio a) :=
⟨fun a =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := exists_lt (a : α)
⟨⟨b, lt_trans hb a.2⟩, hb⟩⟩
instance [NoMinOrder α] : NoMinOrder (Iic a) :=
⟨fun a =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := exists_lt (a : α)
⟨⟨b, hb.le.trans a.2⟩, hb⟩⟩
instance [NoMaxOrder α] : NoMaxOrder (Ioi a) :=
OrderDual.noMaxOrder (α := Iio (toDual a))
instance [NoMaxOrder α] : NoMaxOrder (Ici a) :=
OrderDual.noMaxOrder (α := Iic (toDual a))
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty (h : ¬a ≤ b) : Icc a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans hb)
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ico a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans_lt hb)
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ioc a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans_le hb)
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans hb)
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_of_lt (h : b < a) : Icc a b = ∅ :=
Icc_eq_empty h.not_le
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ico a b = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioc a b = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty h.not_lt
theorem Ico_self (a : α) : Ico a a = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
theorem Ioc_self (a : α) : Ioc a a = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
theorem Ioo_self (a : α) : Ioo a a = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
@[simp]
theorem Ici_subset_Ici : Ici a ⊆ Ici b ↔ b ≤ a :=
⟨fun h => h <| left_mem_Ici, fun h _ hx => h.trans hx⟩
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Ici_subset_Ici_of_le⟩ := Ici_subset_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Ici_ssubset_Ici : Ici a ⊂ Ici b ↔ b < a where
mp h := by
obtain ⟨ab, c, cb, ac⟩ := ssubset_iff_exists.mp h
exact lt_of_le_not_le (Ici_subset_Ici.mp ab) (fun h' ↦ ac (h'.trans cb))
mpr h := (ssubset_iff_of_subset (Ici_subset_Ici.mpr h.le)).mpr
⟨b, right_mem_Iic, fun h' => h.not_le h'⟩
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Ici_ssubset_Ici_of_le⟩ := Ici_ssubset_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Iic_subset_Iic : Iic a ⊆ Iic b ↔ a ≤ b :=
@Ici_subset_Ici αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Iic_subset_Iic_of_le⟩ := Iic_subset_Iic
@[simp]
theorem Iic_ssubset_Iic : Iic a ⊂ Iic b ↔ a < b :=
@Ici_ssubset_Ici αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Iic_ssubset_Iic_of_le⟩ := Iic_ssubset_Iic
@[simp]
theorem Ici_subset_Ioi : Ici a ⊆ Ioi b ↔ b < a :=
⟨fun h => h left_mem_Ici, fun h _ hx => h.trans_le hx⟩
@[simp]
theorem Iic_subset_Iio : Iic a ⊆ Iio b ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun h => h right_mem_Iic, fun h _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt hx h⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans_lt hx₁, hx₂.trans_le h₂⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioo a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans hx₁, hx₂.trans_le h₂⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ico a₁ b :=
Ico_subset_Ico h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ :=
Ico_subset_Ico le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans hx₁, le_trans hx₂ h₂⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Icc a₂ b ⊆ Icc a₁ b :=
Icc_subset_Icc h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Icc a b₂ :=
Icc_subset_Icc le_rfl h
theorem Icc_subset_Ioo (ha : a₂ < a₁) (hb : b₁ < b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ := fun _ hx =>
⟨ha.trans_le hx.1, hx.2.trans_lt hb⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ici_self : Icc a b ⊆ Ici a := fun _ => And.left
theorem Icc_subset_Iic_self : Icc a b ⊆ Iic b := fun _ => And.right
theorem Ioc_subset_Iic_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Iic b := fun _ => And.right
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans_lt hx₁, hx₂.trans h₂⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioc a₂ b ⊆ Ioc a₁ b :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioc a b₂ :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc le_rfl h
theorem Ico_subset_Ioo_left (h₁ : a₁ < a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b := fun _ =>
And.imp_left h₁.trans_le
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ := fun _ =>
And.imp_right fun h' => h'.trans_lt h
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_right (h₁ : b₁ < b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ := fun _ =>
And.imp_right fun h₂ => h₂.trans_lt h₁
theorem Ioo_subset_Ico_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ico a b := fun _ => And.imp_left le_of_lt
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioc a b := fun _ => And.imp_right le_of_lt
theorem Ico_subset_Icc_self : Ico a b ⊆ Icc a b := fun _ => And.imp_right le_of_lt
theorem Ioc_subset_Icc_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Icc a b := fun _ => And.imp_left le_of_lt
theorem Ioo_subset_Icc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Icc a b :=
Subset.trans Ioo_subset_Ico_self Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ico_subset_Iio_self : Ico a b ⊆ Iio b := fun _ => And.right
theorem Ioo_subset_Iio_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Iio b := fun _ => And.right
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioi_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Ioi a := fun _ => And.left
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioi_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioi a := fun _ => And.left
theorem Ioi_subset_Ici_self : Ioi a ⊆ Ici a := fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx
theorem Iio_subset_Iic_self : Iio a ⊆ Iic a := fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx
theorem Ico_subset_Ici_self : Ico a b ⊆ Ici a := fun _ => And.left
theorem Ioi_ssubset_Ici_self : Ioi a ⊂ Ici a :=
⟨Ioi_subset_Ici_self, fun h => lt_irrefl a (h le_rfl)⟩
theorem Iio_ssubset_Iic_self : Iio a ⊂ Iic a :=
@Ioi_ssubset_Ici_self αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans hx, hx'.trans h'⟩⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ioo_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans_le hx, hx'.trans_lt h'⟩⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans hx, hx'.trans_lt h'⟩⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ioc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans_le hx, hx'.trans h'⟩⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Iio_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Iio b₂ ↔ b₁ < b₂ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩, fun h _ ⟨_, hx'⟩ => hx'.trans_lt h⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ioi_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioi a₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩, fun h _ ⟨hx, _⟩ => h.trans_le hx⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Iic_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Iic b₂ ↔ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩, fun h _ ⟨_, hx'⟩ => hx'.trans h⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ici_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ici a₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩, fun h _ ⟨hx, _⟩ => h.trans hx⟩
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_left (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ < a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ :=
(ssubset_iff_of_subset (Icc_subset_Icc (le_of_lt ha) hb)).mpr
⟨a₂, left_mem_Icc.mpr hI, not_and.mpr fun f _ => lt_irrefl a₂ (ha.trans_le f)⟩
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_right (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ < b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ :=
(ssubset_iff_of_subset (Icc_subset_Icc ha (le_of_lt hb))).mpr
⟨b₂, right_mem_Icc.mpr hI, fun f => lt_irrefl b₁ (hb.trans_le f.2)⟩
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(b, +∞) ⊆ (a, +∞)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in linear orders, use `Ioi_subset_Ioi_iff`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_subset_Ioi (h : a ≤ b) : Ioi b ⊆ Ioi a := fun _ hx => h.trans_lt hx
/-- If `a < b`, then `(b, +∞) ⊂ (a, +∞)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in linear orders, use `Ioi_ssubset_Ioi_iff`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_ssubset_Ioi (h : a < b) : Ioi b ⊂ Ioi a :=
(ssubset_iff_of_subset (Ioi_subset_Ioi h.le)).mpr ⟨b, h, lt_irrefl b⟩
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(b, +∞) ⊆ [a, +∞)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in dense linear orders, use `Ioi_subset_Ici_iff`. -/
theorem Ioi_subset_Ici (h : a ≤ b) : Ioi b ⊆ Ici a :=
Subset.trans (Ioi_subset_Ioi h) Ioi_subset_Ici_self
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(-∞, a) ⊆ (-∞, b)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in linear orders, use `Iio_subset_Iio_iff`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem Iio_subset_Iio (h : a ≤ b) : Iio a ⊆ Iio b := fun _ hx => lt_of_lt_of_le hx h
/-- If `a < b`, then `(-∞, a) ⊂ (-∞, b)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in linear orders, use `Iio_ssubset_Iio_iff`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem Iio_ssubset_Iio (h : a < b) : Iio a ⊂ Iio b :=
(ssubset_iff_of_subset (Iio_subset_Iio h.le)).mpr ⟨a, h, lt_irrefl a⟩
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(-∞, a) ⊆ (-∞, b]`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in dense linear orders, use `Iio_subset_Iic_iff`. -/
theorem Iio_subset_Iic (h : a ≤ b) : Iio a ⊆ Iic b :=
Subset.trans (Iio_subset_Iio h) Iio_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ici_inter_Iic : Ici a ∩ Iic b = Icc a b :=
rfl
theorem Ici_inter_Iio : Ici a ∩ Iio b = Ico a b :=
rfl
theorem Ioi_inter_Iic : Ioi a ∩ Iic b = Ioc a b :=
rfl
theorem Ioi_inter_Iio : Ioi a ∩ Iio b = Ioo a b :=
rfl
theorem Iic_inter_Ici : Iic a ∩ Ici b = Icc b a :=
inter_comm _ _
theorem Iio_inter_Ici : Iio a ∩ Ici b = Ico b a :=
inter_comm _ _
theorem Iic_inter_Ioi : Iic a ∩ Ioi b = Ioc b a :=
inter_comm _ _
theorem Iio_inter_Ioi : Iio a ∩ Ioi b = Ioo b a :=
inter_comm _ _
theorem mem_Icc_of_Ioo (h : x ∈ Ioo a b) : x ∈ Icc a b :=
Ioo_subset_Icc_self h
theorem mem_Ico_of_Ioo (h : x ∈ Ioo a b) : x ∈ Ico a b :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self h
theorem mem_Ioc_of_Ioo (h : x ∈ Ioo a b) : x ∈ Ioc a b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioc_self h
theorem mem_Icc_of_Ico (h : x ∈ Ico a b) : x ∈ Icc a b :=
Ico_subset_Icc_self h
theorem mem_Icc_of_Ioc (h : x ∈ Ioc a b) : x ∈ Icc a b :=
Ioc_subset_Icc_self h
theorem mem_Ici_of_Ioi (h : x ∈ Ioi a) : x ∈ Ici a :=
Ioi_subset_Ici_self h
theorem mem_Iic_of_Iio (h : x ∈ Iio a) : x ∈ Iic a :=
Iio_subset_Iic_self h
theorem Icc_eq_empty_iff : Icc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a ≤ b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Icc]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_iff : Ico a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Ico]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_iff : Ioc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Ioc]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_iff [DenselyOrdered α] : Ioo a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Ioo]
theorem _root_.IsTop.Iic_eq (h : IsTop a) : Iic a = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall h
theorem _root_.IsBot.Ici_eq (h : IsBot a) : Ici a = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall h
@[simp] theorem Ioi_eq_empty_iff : Ioi a = ∅ ↔ IsMax a := by
simp only [isMax_iff_forall_not_lt, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_Ioi]
@[simp] theorem Iio_eq_empty_iff : Iio a = ∅ ↔ IsMin a := Ioi_eq_empty_iff (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp] alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMax.Ioi_eq⟩ := Ioi_eq_empty_iff
@[simp] alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMin.Iio_eq⟩ := Iio_eq_empty_iff
@[simp] lemma Iio_nonempty : (Iio a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMin a := by simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
@[simp] lemma Ioi_nonempty : (Ioi a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMax a := by simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem Iic_inter_Ioc_of_le (h : a ≤ c) : Iic a ∩ Ioc b c = Ioc b a :=
ext fun _ => ⟨fun H => ⟨H.2.1, H.1⟩, fun H => ⟨H.2, H.1, H.2.trans h⟩⟩
theorem not_mem_Icc_of_lt (ha : c < a) : c ∉ Icc a b := fun h => ha.not_le h.1
theorem not_mem_Icc_of_gt (hb : b < c) : c ∉ Icc a b := fun h => hb.not_le h.2
theorem not_mem_Ico_of_lt (ha : c < a) : c ∉ Ico a b := fun h => ha.not_le h.1
theorem not_mem_Ioc_of_gt (hb : b < c) : c ∉ Ioc a b := fun h => hb.not_le h.2
theorem not_mem_Ioi_self : a ∉ Ioi a := lt_irrefl _
theorem not_mem_Iio_self : b ∉ Iio b := lt_irrefl _
theorem not_mem_Ioc_of_le (ha : c ≤ a) : c ∉ Ioc a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.1.trans_le ha
theorem not_mem_Ico_of_ge (hb : b ≤ c) : c ∉ Ico a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.2.trans_le hb
theorem not_mem_Ioo_of_le (ha : c ≤ a) : c ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.1.trans_le ha
theorem not_mem_Ioo_of_ge (hb : b ≤ c) : c ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.2.trans_le hb
section matched_intervals
@[simp] theorem Icc_eq_Ioc_same_iff : Icc a b = Ioc a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h a
mpr h := by rw [Icc_eq_empty h, Ioc_eq_empty (mt le_of_lt h)]
@[simp] theorem Icc_eq_Ico_same_iff : Icc a b = Ico a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h b
mpr h := by rw [Icc_eq_empty h, Ico_eq_empty (mt le_of_lt h)]
@[simp] theorem Icc_eq_Ioo_same_iff : Icc a b = Ioo a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h b
mpr h := by rw [Icc_eq_empty h, Ioo_eq_empty (mt le_of_lt h)]
@[simp] theorem Ioc_eq_Ico_same_iff : Ioc a b = Ico a b ↔ ¬a < b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h a
mpr h := by rw [Ioc_eq_empty h, Ico_eq_empty h]
@[simp] theorem Ioo_eq_Ioc_same_iff : Ioo a b = Ioc a b ↔ ¬a < b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h b
mpr h := by rw [Ioo_eq_empty h, Ioc_eq_empty h]
@[simp] theorem Ioo_eq_Ico_same_iff : Ioo a b = Ico a b ↔ ¬a < b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h a
mpr h := by rw [Ioo_eq_empty h, Ico_eq_empty h]
-- Mirrored versions of the above for `simp`.
@[simp] theorem Ioc_eq_Icc_same_iff : Ioc a b = Icc a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b :=
eq_comm.trans Icc_eq_Ioc_same_iff
@[simp] theorem Ico_eq_Icc_same_iff : Ico a b = Icc a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b :=
eq_comm.trans Icc_eq_Ico_same_iff
@[simp] theorem Ioo_eq_Icc_same_iff : Ioo a b = Icc a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b :=
eq_comm.trans Icc_eq_Ioo_same_iff
@[simp] theorem Ico_eq_Ioc_same_iff : Ico a b = Ioc a b ↔ ¬a < b :=
eq_comm.trans Ioc_eq_Ico_same_iff
@[simp] theorem Ioc_eq_Ioo_same_iff : Ioc a b = Ioo a b ↔ ¬a < b :=
eq_comm.trans Ioo_eq_Ioc_same_iff
@[simp] theorem Ico_eq_Ioo_same_iff : Ico a b = Ioo a b ↔ ¬a < b :=
eq_comm.trans Ioo_eq_Ico_same_iff
end matched_intervals
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem Icc_self (a : α) : Icc a a = {a} :=
Set.ext <| by simp [Icc, le_antisymm_iff, and_comm]
instance instIccUnique : Unique (Set.Icc a a) where
default := ⟨a, by simp⟩
uniq y := Subtype.ext <| by simpa using y.2
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_singleton_iff : Icc a b = {c} ↔ a = c ∧ b = c := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· have hab : a ≤ b := nonempty_Icc.1 (h.symm.subst <| singleton_nonempty c)
exact
⟨eq_of_mem_singleton <| h ▸ left_mem_Icc.2 hab,
eq_of_mem_singleton <| h ▸ right_mem_Icc.2 hab⟩
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact Icc_self _
lemma subsingleton_Icc_of_ge (hba : b ≤ a) : Set.Subsingleton (Icc a b) :=
fun _x ⟨hax, hxb⟩ _y ⟨hay, hyb⟩ ↦ le_antisymm
(le_implies_le_of_le_of_le hxb hay hba) (le_implies_le_of_le_of_le hyb hax hba)
@[simp] lemma subsingleton_Icc_iff {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} :
Set.Subsingleton (Icc a b) ↔ b ≤ a := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, subsingleton_Icc_of_ge⟩
contrapose! h
simp only [gt_iff_lt, not_subsingleton_iff]
exact ⟨a, ⟨le_refl _, h.le⟩, b, ⟨h.le, le_refl _⟩, h.ne⟩
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_left : Icc a b \ {a} = Ioc a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, eq_comm, and_right_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_right : Icc a b \ {b} = Ico a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, and_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_diff_left : Ico a b \ {a} = Ioo a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [and_right_comm, ← lt_iff_le_and_ne, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_diff_right : Ioc a b \ {b} = Ioo a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [and_assoc, ← lt_iff_le_and_ne]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_both : Icc a b \ {a, b} = Ioo a b := by
rw [insert_eq, ← diff_diff, Icc_diff_left, Ioc_diff_right]
@[simp]
theorem Ici_diff_left : Ici a \ {a} = Ioi a :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Iic_diff_right : Iic a \ {a} = Iio a :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_diff_Ioo_same (h : a < b) : Ico a b \ Ioo a b = {a} := by
rw [← Ico_diff_left, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| left_mem_Ico.2 h)]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_diff_Ioo_same (h : a < b) : Ioc a b \ Ioo a b = {b} := by
rw [← Ioc_diff_right, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| right_mem_Ioc.2 h)]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ico_same (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ico a b = {b} := by
rw [← Icc_diff_right, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| right_mem_Icc.2 h)]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ioc_same (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ioc a b = {a} := by
rw [← Icc_diff_left, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| left_mem_Icc.2 h)]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ioo_same (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ioo a b = {a, b} := by
rw [← Icc_diff_both, diff_diff_cancel_left]
simp [insert_subset_iff, h]
@[simp]
theorem Ici_diff_Ioi_same : Ici a \ Ioi a = {a} := by
rw [← Ici_diff_left, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 left_mem_Ici)]
@[simp]
theorem Iic_diff_Iio_same : Iic a \ Iio a = {a} := by
rw [← Iic_diff_right, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 right_mem_Iic)]
theorem Ioi_union_left : Ioi a ∪ {a} = Ici a :=
ext fun x => by simp [eq_comm, le_iff_eq_or_lt]
theorem Iio_union_right : Iio a ∪ {a} = Iic a :=
ext fun _ => le_iff_lt_or_eq.symm
theorem Ioo_union_left (hab : a < b) : Ioo a b ∪ {a} = Ico a b := by
rw [← Ico_diff_left, diff_union_self,
union_eq_self_of_subset_right (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| left_mem_Ico.2 hab)]
theorem Ioo_union_right (hab : a < b) : Ioo a b ∪ {b} = Ioc a b := by
simpa only [Ioo_toDual, Ico_toDual] using Ioo_union_left hab.dual
theorem Ioo_union_both (h : a ≤ b) : Ioo a b ∪ {a, b} = Icc a b := by
have : (Icc a b \ {a, b}) ∪ {a, b} = Icc a b := diff_union_of_subset fun
| x, .inl rfl => left_mem_Icc.mpr h
| x, .inr rfl => right_mem_Icc.mpr h
rw [← this, Icc_diff_both]
theorem Ioc_union_left (hab : a ≤ b) : Ioc a b ∪ {a} = Icc a b := by
rw [← Icc_diff_left, diff_union_self,
union_eq_self_of_subset_right (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| left_mem_Icc.2 hab)]
theorem Ico_union_right (hab : a ≤ b) : Ico a b ∪ {b} = Icc a b := by
simpa only [Ioc_toDual, Icc_toDual] using Ioc_union_left hab.dual
@[simp]
theorem Ico_insert_right (h : a ≤ b) : insert b (Ico a b) = Icc a b := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, Ico_union_right h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_insert_left (h : a ≤ b) : insert a (Ioc a b) = Icc a b := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, Ioc_union_left h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_insert_left (h : a < b) : insert a (Ioo a b) = Ico a b := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, Ioo_union_left h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_insert_right (h : a < b) : insert b (Ioo a b) = Ioc a b := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, Ioo_union_right h]
@[simp]
theorem Iio_insert : insert a (Iio a) = Iic a :=
ext fun _ => le_iff_eq_or_lt.symm
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_insert : insert a (Ioi a) = Ici a :=
ext fun _ => (or_congr_left eq_comm).trans le_iff_eq_or_lt.symm
theorem mem_Ici_Ioi_of_subset_of_subset {s : Set α} (ho : Ioi a ⊆ s) (hc : s ⊆ Ici a) :
s ∈ ({Ici a, Ioi a} : Set (Set α)) :=
by_cases
(fun h : a ∈ s =>
Or.inl <| Subset.antisymm hc <| by rw [← Ioi_union_left, union_subset_iff]; simp [*])
fun h =>
Or.inr <| Subset.antisymm (fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_ne (hc hx) fun heq => h <| heq.symm ▸ hx) ho
theorem mem_Iic_Iio_of_subset_of_subset {s : Set α} (ho : Iio a ⊆ s) (hc : s ⊆ Iic a) :
s ∈ ({Iic a, Iio a} : Set (Set α)) :=
@mem_Ici_Ioi_of_subset_of_subset αᵒᵈ _ a s ho hc
theorem mem_Icc_Ico_Ioc_Ioo_of_subset_of_subset {s : Set α} (ho : Ioo a b ⊆ s) (hc : s ⊆ Icc a b) :
s ∈ ({Icc a b, Ico a b, Ioc a b, Ioo a b} : Set (Set α)) := by
classical
by_cases ha : a ∈ s <;> by_cases hb : b ∈ s
· refine Or.inl (Subset.antisymm hc ?_)
rwa [← Ico_diff_left, diff_singleton_subset_iff, insert_eq_of_mem ha, ← Icc_diff_right,
diff_singleton_subset_iff, insert_eq_of_mem hb] at ho
· refine Or.inr <| Or.inl <| Subset.antisymm ?_ ?_
· rw [← Icc_diff_right]
exact subset_diff_singleton hc hb
· rwa [← Ico_diff_left, diff_singleton_subset_iff, insert_eq_of_mem ha] at ho
· refine Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Or.inl <| Subset.antisymm ?_ ?_
· rw [← Icc_diff_left]
exact subset_diff_singleton hc ha
· rwa [← Ioc_diff_right, diff_singleton_subset_iff, insert_eq_of_mem hb] at ho
· refine Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Subset.antisymm ?_ ho
rw [← Ico_diff_left, ← Icc_diff_right]
apply_rules [subset_diff_singleton]
theorem eq_left_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Ico {x : α} (hmem : x ∈ Ico a b) : x = a ∨ x ∈ Ioo a b :=
hmem.1.eq_or_gt.imp_right fun h => ⟨h, hmem.2⟩
theorem eq_right_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Ioc {x : α} (hmem : x ∈ Ioc a b) : x = b ∨ x ∈ Ioo a b :=
hmem.2.eq_or_lt.imp_right <| And.intro hmem.1
theorem eq_endpoints_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Icc {x : α} (hmem : x ∈ Icc a b) :
x = a ∨ x = b ∨ x ∈ Ioo a b :=
hmem.1.eq_or_gt.imp_right fun h => eq_right_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Ioc ⟨h, hmem.2⟩
theorem _root_.IsMax.Ici_eq (h : IsMax a) : Ici a = {a} :=
eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem.2 ⟨left_mem_Ici, fun _ => h.eq_of_ge⟩
theorem _root_.IsMin.Iic_eq (h : IsMin a) : Iic a = {a} :=
h.toDual.Ici_eq
theorem Ici_injective : Injective (Ici : α → Set α) := fun _ _ =>
eq_of_forall_ge_iff ∘ Set.ext_iff.1
theorem Iic_injective : Injective (Iic : α → Set α) := fun _ _ =>
eq_of_forall_le_iff ∘ Set.ext_iff.1
theorem Ici_inj : Ici a = Ici b ↔ a = b :=
Ici_injective.eq_iff
theorem Iic_inj : Iic a = Iic b ↔ a = b :=
Iic_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem Icc_inter_Icc_eq_singleton (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : Icc a b ∩ Icc b c = {b} := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iic, ← Iic_inter_Ici, inter_inter_inter_comm, Iic_inter_Ici]
simp [hab, hbc]
lemma Icc_eq_Icc_iff {d : α} (h : a ≤ b) :
Icc a b = Icc c d ↔ a = c ∧ b = d := by
refine ⟨fun heq ↦ ?_, by rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩; rfl⟩
have h' : c ≤ d := by
by_contra contra; rw [Icc_eq_empty_iff.mpr contra, Icc_eq_empty_iff] at heq; contradiction
simp only [Set.ext_iff, mem_Icc] at heq
obtain ⟨-, h₁⟩ := (heq b).mp ⟨h, le_refl _⟩
obtain ⟨h₂, -⟩ := (heq a).mp ⟨le_refl _, h⟩
obtain ⟨h₃, -⟩ := (heq c).mpr ⟨le_refl _, h'⟩
obtain ⟨-, h₄⟩ := (heq d).mpr ⟨h', le_refl _⟩
exact ⟨le_antisymm h₃ h₂, le_antisymm h₁ h₄⟩
end PartialOrder
section OrderTop
@[simp]
theorem Ici_top [PartialOrder α] [OrderTop α] : Ici (⊤ : α) = {⊤} :=
isMax_top.Ici_eq
variable [Preorder α] [OrderTop α] {a : α}
theorem Ioi_top : Ioi (⊤ : α) = ∅ :=
isMax_top.Ioi_eq
@[simp]
theorem Iic_top : Iic (⊤ : α) = univ :=
isTop_top.Iic_eq
@[simp]
theorem Icc_top : Icc a ⊤ = Ici a := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_top : Ioc a ⊤ = Ioi a := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
end OrderTop
section OrderBot
@[simp]
theorem Iic_bot [PartialOrder α] [OrderBot α] : Iic (⊥ : α) = {⊥} :=
isMin_bot.Iic_eq
variable [Preorder α] [OrderBot α] {a : α}
theorem Iio_bot : Iio (⊥ : α) = ∅ :=
isMin_bot.Iio_eq
@[simp]
theorem Ici_bot : Ici (⊥ : α) = univ :=
isBot_bot.Ici_eq
@[simp]
theorem Icc_bot : Icc ⊥ a = Iic a := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_bot : Ico ⊥ a = Iio a := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
| end OrderBot
theorem Icc_bot_top [Preorder α] [BoundedOrder α] : Icc (⊥ : α) ⊤ = univ := by simp
section Lattice
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Set/Basic.lean | 896 | 900 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.MFDeriv.Defs
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.ContMDiff.Defs
/-!
# Basic properties of the manifold Fréchet derivative
In this file, we show various properties of the manifold Fréchet derivative,
mimicking the API for Fréchet derivatives.
- basic properties of unique differentiability sets
- various general lemmas about the manifold Fréchet derivative
- deducing differentiability from smoothness,
- deriving continuity from differentiability on manifolds,
- congruence lemmas for derivatives on manifolds
- composition lemmas and the chain rule
-/
noncomputable section
assert_not_exists tangentBundleCore
open scoped Topology Manifold
open Set Bundle ChartedSpace
section DerivativesProperties
/-! ### Unique differentiability sets in manifolds -/
variable
{𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
{H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H)
{M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
{E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E']
{H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H'] {I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'}
{M' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M'] [ChartedSpace H' M']
{E'' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E''] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'']
{H'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H''] {I'' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E'' H''}
{M'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M''] [ChartedSpace H'' M'']
{f f₁ : M → M'} {x : M} {s t : Set M} {g : M' → M''} {u : Set M'}
theorem uniqueMDiffWithinAt_univ : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I univ x := by
unfold UniqueMDiffWithinAt
simp only [preimage_univ, univ_inter]
exact I.uniqueDiffOn _ (mem_range_self _)
variable {I}
theorem uniqueMDiffWithinAt_iff_inter_range {s : Set M} {x : M} :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x ↔
UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I)
((extChartAt I x) x) := Iff.rfl
theorem uniqueMDiffWithinAt_iff {s : Set M} {x : M} :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x ↔
UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ (extChartAt I x).target)
((extChartAt I x) x) := by
apply uniqueDiffWithinAt_congr
rw [nhdsWithin_inter, nhdsWithin_inter, nhdsWithin_extChartAt_target_eq]
nonrec theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono_nhds {s t : Set M} {x : M} (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x)
(ht : 𝓝[s] x ≤ 𝓝[t] x) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I t x :=
hs.mono_nhds <| by simpa only [← map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin] using Filter.map_mono ht
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin {s t : Set M} {x : M}
(hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I t x :=
hs.mono_nhds (nhdsWithin_le_iff.2 ht)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")]
alias UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono_of_mem := UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono (h : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (st : s ⊆ t) :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I t x :=
UniqueDiffWithinAt.mono h <| inter_subset_inter (preimage_mono st) (Subset.refl _)
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.inter' (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I (s ∩ t) x :=
hs.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin (Filter.inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin ht)
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.inter (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I (s ∩ t) x :=
hs.inter' (nhdsWithin_le_nhds ht)
theorem IsOpen.uniqueMDiffWithinAt (hs : IsOpen s) (xs : x ∈ s) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x :=
(uniqueMDiffWithinAt_univ I).mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin <| nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| hs.mem_nhds xs
theorem UniqueMDiffOn.inter (hs : UniqueMDiffOn I s) (ht : IsOpen t) : UniqueMDiffOn I (s ∩ t) :=
fun _x hx => UniqueMDiffWithinAt.inter (hs _ hx.1) (ht.mem_nhds hx.2)
theorem IsOpen.uniqueMDiffOn (hs : IsOpen s) : UniqueMDiffOn I s :=
fun _x hx => hs.uniqueMDiffWithinAt hx
theorem uniqueMDiffOn_univ : UniqueMDiffOn I (univ : Set M) :=
isOpen_univ.uniqueMDiffOn
nonrec theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.prod {x : M} {y : M'} {s t} (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x)
(ht : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I' t y) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt (I.prod I') (s ×ˢ t) (x, y) := by
refine (hs.prod ht).mono ?_
rw [ModelWithCorners.range_prod, ← prod_inter_prod]
rfl
theorem UniqueMDiffOn.prod {s : Set M} {t : Set M'} (hs : UniqueMDiffOn I s)
(ht : UniqueMDiffOn I' t) : UniqueMDiffOn (I.prod I') (s ×ˢ t) := fun x h ↦
(hs x.1 h.1).prod (ht x.2 h.2)
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.mono (hst : s ⊆ t) (h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f t x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x :=
⟨ContinuousWithinAt.mono h.1 hst, DifferentiableWithinAt.mono
h.differentiableWithinAt_writtenInExtChartAt
(inter_subset_inter_left _ (preimage_mono hst))⟩
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f univ x ↔ MDifferentiableAt I I' f x := by
simp_rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, MDifferentiableAt, ChartedSpace.LiftPropAt]
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f (s ∩ t) x ↔ MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x := by
rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, MDifferentiableWithinAt,
differentiableWithinAt_localInvariantProp.liftPropWithinAt_inter ht]
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter' (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f (s ∩ t) x ↔ MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x := by
rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, MDifferentiableWithinAt,
differentiableWithinAt_localInvariantProp.liftPropWithinAt_inter' ht]
theorem MDifferentiableAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt (h : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x :=
MDifferentiableWithinAt.mono (subset_univ _) (mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ.2 h)
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.mdifferentiableAt (h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x)
(hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x := by
have : s = univ ∩ s := by rw [univ_inter]
rwa [this, mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter hs, mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ] at h
theorem MDifferentiableOn.mono (h : MDifferentiableOn I I' f t) (st : s ⊆ t) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s := fun x hx => (h x (st hx)).mono st
theorem mdifferentiableOn_univ : MDifferentiableOn I I' f univ ↔ MDifferentiable I I' f := by
simp only [MDifferentiableOn, mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ, mfld_simps]; rfl
theorem MDifferentiableOn.mdifferentiableAt (h : MDifferentiableOn I I' f s) (hx : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x :=
(h x (mem_of_mem_nhds hx)).mdifferentiableAt hx
theorem MDifferentiable.mdifferentiableOn (h : MDifferentiable I I' f) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s :=
(mdifferentiableOn_univ.2 h).mono (subset_univ _)
theorem mdifferentiableOn_of_locally_mdifferentiableOn
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ x ∈ u ∧ MDifferentiableOn I I' f (s ∩ u)) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s := by
intro x xs
rcases h x xs with ⟨t, t_open, xt, ht⟩
exact (mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter (t_open.mem_nhds xt)).1 (ht x ⟨xs, xt⟩)
| theorem MDifferentiable.mdifferentiableAt (hf : MDifferentiable I I' f) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x :=
hf x
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/MFDeriv/Basic.lean | 161 | 163 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Convex
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Additive.AP.Three.Defs
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Pigeonhole
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.ExponentialBounds
/-!
# Behrend's bound on Roth numbers
This file proves Behrend's lower bound on Roth numbers. This says that we can find a subset of
`{1, ..., n}` of size `n / exp (O (sqrt (log n)))` which does not contain arithmetic progressions of
length `3`.
The idea is that the sphere (in the `n` dimensional Euclidean space) doesn't contain arithmetic
progressions (literally) because the corresponding ball is strictly convex. Thus we can take
integer points on that sphere and map them onto `ℕ` in a way that preserves arithmetic progressions
(`Behrend.map`).
## Main declarations
* `Behrend.sphere`: The intersection of the Euclidean sphere with the positive integer quadrant.
This is the set that we will map on `ℕ`.
* `Behrend.map`: Given a natural number `d`, `Behrend.map d : ℕⁿ → ℕ` reads off the coordinates as
digits in base `d`.
* `Behrend.card_sphere_le_rothNumberNat`: Implicit lower bound on Roth numbers in terms of
`Behrend.sphere`.
* `Behrend.roth_lower_bound`: Behrend's explicit lower bound on Roth numbers.
## References
* [Bryan Gillespie, *Behrend’s Construction*]
(http://www.epsilonsmall.com/resources/behrends-construction/behrend.pdf)
* Behrend, F. A., "On sets of integers which contain no three terms in arithmetical progression"
* [Wikipedia, *Salem-Spencer set*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salem–Spencer_set)
## Tags
3AP-free, Salem-Spencer, Behrend construction, arithmetic progression, sphere, strictly convex
-/
assert_not_exists IsConformalMap Conformal
open Nat hiding log
open Finset Metric Real
open scoped Pointwise
/-- The frontier of a closed strictly convex set only contains trivial arithmetic progressions.
The idea is that an arithmetic progression is contained on a line and the frontier of a strictly
convex set does not contain lines. -/
lemma threeAPFree_frontier {𝕜 E : Type*} [Field 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜]
[TopologicalSpace E]
[AddCommMonoid E] [Module 𝕜 E] {s : Set E} (hs₀ : IsClosed s) (hs₁ : StrictConvex 𝕜 s) :
ThreeAPFree (frontier s) := by
intro a ha b hb c hc habc
obtain rfl : (1 / 2 : 𝕜) • a + (1 / 2 : 𝕜) • c = b := by
rwa [← smul_add, one_div, inv_smul_eq_iff₀ (show (2 : 𝕜) ≠ 0 by norm_num), two_smul]
have :=
hs₁.eq (hs₀.frontier_subset ha) (hs₀.frontier_subset hc) one_half_pos one_half_pos
(add_halves _) hb.2
simp [this, ← add_smul]
ring_nf
simp
lemma threeAPFree_sphere {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[StrictConvexSpace ℝ E] (x : E) (r : ℝ) : ThreeAPFree (sphere x r) := by
obtain rfl | hr := eq_or_ne r 0
· rw [sphere_zero]
exact threeAPFree_singleton _
· convert threeAPFree_frontier isClosed_closedBall (strictConvex_closedBall ℝ x r)
exact (frontier_closedBall _ hr).symm
namespace Behrend
variable {n d k N : ℕ} {x : Fin n → ℕ}
/-!
### Turning the sphere into 3AP-free set
We define `Behrend.sphere`, the intersection of the $L^2$ sphere with the positive quadrant of
integer points. Because the $L^2$ closed ball is strictly convex, the $L^2$ sphere and
`Behrend.sphere` are 3AP-free (`threeAPFree_sphere`). Then we can turn this set in
`Fin n → ℕ` into a set in `ℕ` using `Behrend.map`, which preserves `ThreeAPFree` because it is
an additive monoid homomorphism.
-/
/-- The box `{0, ..., d - 1}^n` as a `Finset`. -/
def box (n d : ℕ) : Finset (Fin n → ℕ) :=
Fintype.piFinset fun _ => range d
theorem mem_box : x ∈ box n d ↔ ∀ i, x i < d := by simp only [box, Fintype.mem_piFinset, mem_range]
@[simp]
theorem card_box : #(box n d) = d ^ n := by simp [box]
@[simp]
theorem box_zero : box (n + 1) 0 = ∅ := by simp [box]
/-- The intersection of the sphere of radius `√k` with the integer points in the positive
quadrant. -/
def sphere (n d k : ℕ) : Finset (Fin n → ℕ) := {x ∈ box n d | ∑ i, x i ^ 2 = k}
theorem sphere_zero_subset : sphere n d 0 ⊆ 0 := fun x => by simp [sphere, funext_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sphere_zero_right (n k : ℕ) : sphere (n + 1) 0 k = ∅ := by simp [sphere]
theorem sphere_subset_box : sphere n d k ⊆ box n d :=
filter_subset _ _
theorem norm_of_mem_sphere {x : Fin n → ℕ} (hx : x ∈ sphere n d k) :
‖(WithLp.equiv 2 _).symm ((↑) ∘ x : Fin n → ℝ)‖ = √↑k := by
rw [EuclideanSpace.norm_eq]
dsimp
simp_rw [abs_cast, ← cast_pow, ← cast_sum, (mem_filter.1 hx).2]
theorem sphere_subset_preimage_metric_sphere : (sphere n d k : Set (Fin n → ℕ)) ⊆
(fun x : Fin n → ℕ => (WithLp.equiv 2 _).symm ((↑) ∘ x : Fin n → ℝ)) ⁻¹'
Metric.sphere (0 : PiLp 2 fun _ : Fin n => ℝ) (√↑k) :=
fun x hx => by rw [Set.mem_preimage, mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm, norm_of_mem_sphere hx]
/-- The map that appears in Behrend's bound on Roth numbers. -/
@[simps]
def map (d : ℕ) : (Fin n → ℕ) →+ ℕ where
toFun a := ∑ i, a i * d ^ (i : ℕ)
map_zero' := by simp_rw [Pi.zero_apply, zero_mul, sum_const_zero]
map_add' a b := by simp_rw [Pi.add_apply, add_mul, sum_add_distrib]
theorem map_zero (d : ℕ) (a : Fin 0 → ℕ) : map d a = 0 := by simp [map]
theorem map_succ (a : Fin (n + 1) → ℕ) :
map d a = a 0 + (∑ x : Fin n, a x.succ * d ^ (x : ℕ)) * d := by
simp [map, Fin.sum_univ_succ, _root_.pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, ← sum_mul]
theorem map_succ' (a : Fin (n + 1) → ℕ) : map d a = a 0 + map d (a ∘ Fin.succ) * d :=
map_succ _
theorem map_monotone (d : ℕ) : Monotone (map d : (Fin n → ℕ) → ℕ) := fun x y h => by
dsimp; exact sum_le_sum fun i _ => Nat.mul_le_mul_right _ <| h i
theorem map_mod (a : Fin n.succ → ℕ) : map d a % d = a 0 % d := by
rw [map_succ, Nat.add_mul_mod_self_right]
theorem map_eq_iff {x₁ x₂ : Fin n.succ → ℕ} (hx₁ : ∀ i, x₁ i < d) (hx₂ : ∀ i, x₂ i < d) :
map d x₁ = map d x₂ ↔ x₁ 0 = x₂ 0 ∧ map d (x₁ ∘ Fin.succ) = map d (x₂ ∘ Fin.succ) := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => by rw [map_succ', map_succ', h.1, h.2]⟩
have : x₁ 0 = x₂ 0 := by
rw [← mod_eq_of_lt (hx₁ _), ← map_mod, ← mod_eq_of_lt (hx₂ _), ← map_mod, h]
rw [map_succ, map_succ, this, add_right_inj, mul_eq_mul_right_iff] at h
exact ⟨this, h.resolve_right (pos_of_gt (hx₁ 0)).ne'⟩
theorem map_injOn : {x : Fin n → ℕ | ∀ i, x i < d}.InjOn (map d) := by
intro x₁ hx₁ x₂ hx₂ h
induction n with
| zero => simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
| succ n ih =>
ext i
have x := (map_eq_iff hx₁ hx₂).1 h
exact Fin.cases x.1 (congr_fun <| ih (fun _ => hx₁ _) (fun _ => hx₂ _) x.2) i
theorem map_le_of_mem_box (hx : x ∈ box n d) :
map (2 * d - 1) x ≤ ∑ i : Fin n, (d - 1) * (2 * d - 1) ^ (i : ℕ) :=
map_monotone (2 * d - 1) fun _ => Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt <| mem_box.1 hx _
nonrec theorem threeAPFree_sphere : ThreeAPFree (sphere n d k : Set (Fin n → ℕ)) := by
set f : (Fin n → ℕ) →+ EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n) :=
{ toFun := fun f => ((↑) : ℕ → ℝ) ∘ f
map_zero' := funext fun _ => cast_zero
map_add' := fun _ _ => funext fun _ => cast_add _ _ }
refine ThreeAPFree.of_image (AddMonoidHomClass.isAddFreimanHom f (Set.mapsTo_image _ _))
cast_injective.comp_left.injOn (Set.subset_univ _) ?_
refine (threeAPFree_sphere 0 (√↑k)).mono (Set.image_subset_iff.2 fun x => ?_)
rw [Set.mem_preimage, mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm]
exact norm_of_mem_sphere
theorem threeAPFree_image_sphere :
ThreeAPFree ((sphere n d k).image (map (2 * d - 1)) : Set ℕ) := by
rw [coe_image]
apply ThreeAPFree.image' (α := Fin n → ℕ) (β := ℕ) (s := sphere n d k) (map (2 * d - 1))
(map_injOn.mono _) threeAPFree_sphere
rw [Set.add_subset_iff]
rintro a ha b hb i
have hai := mem_box.1 (sphere_subset_box ha) i
have hbi := mem_box.1 (sphere_subset_box hb) i
rw [lt_tsub_iff_right, ← succ_le_iff, two_mul]
exact (add_add_add_comm _ _ 1 1).trans_le (_root_.add_le_add hai hbi)
theorem sum_sq_le_of_mem_box (hx : x ∈ box n d) : ∑ i : Fin n, x i ^ 2 ≤ n * (d - 1) ^ 2 := by
rw [mem_box] at hx
have : ∀ i, x i ^ 2 ≤ (d - 1) ^ 2 := fun i =>
Nat.pow_le_pow_left (Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt (hx i)) _
exact (sum_le_card_nsmul univ _ _ fun i _ => this i).trans (by rw [card_fin, smul_eq_mul])
theorem sum_eq : (∑ i : Fin n, d * (2 * d + 1) ^ (i : ℕ)) = ((2 * d + 1) ^ n - 1) / 2 := by
refine (Nat.div_eq_of_eq_mul_left zero_lt_two ?_).symm
rw [← sum_range fun i => d * (2 * d + 1) ^ (i : ℕ), ← mul_sum, mul_right_comm, mul_comm d, ←
geom_sum_mul_add, add_tsub_cancel_right, mul_comm]
theorem sum_lt : (∑ i : Fin n, d * (2 * d + 1) ^ (i : ℕ)) < (2 * d + 1) ^ n :=
sum_eq.trans_lt <| (Nat.div_le_self _ 2).trans_lt <| pred_lt (pow_pos (succ_pos _) _).ne'
theorem card_sphere_le_rothNumberNat (n d k : ℕ) :
#(sphere n d k) ≤ rothNumberNat ((2 * d - 1) ^ n) := by
cases n
· dsimp; refine (card_le_univ _).trans_eq ?_; rfl
cases d
· simp
apply threeAPFree_image_sphere.le_rothNumberNat _ _ (card_image_of_injOn _)
· simp only [subset_iff, mem_image, and_imp, forall_exists_index, mem_range,
forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂, sphere, mem_filter]
rintro _ x hx _ rfl
exact (map_le_of_mem_box hx).trans_lt sum_lt
apply map_injOn.mono fun x => ?_
simp only [mem_coe, sphere, mem_filter, mem_box, and_imp, two_mul]
exact fun h _ i => (h i).trans_le le_self_add
/-!
### Optimization
Now that we know how to turn the integer points of any sphere into a 3AP-free set, we find a
sphere containing many integer points by the pigeonhole principle. This gives us an implicit bound
that we then optimize by tweaking the parameters. The (almost) optimal parameters are
`Behrend.nValue` and `Behrend.dValue`.
-/
theorem exists_large_sphere_aux (n d : ℕ) : ∃ k ∈ range (n * (d - 1) ^ 2 + 1),
(↑(d ^ n) / ((n * (d - 1) ^ 2 :) + 1) : ℝ) ≤ #(sphere n d k) := by
refine exists_le_card_fiber_of_nsmul_le_card_of_maps_to (fun x hx => ?_) nonempty_range_succ ?_
· rw [mem_range, Nat.lt_succ_iff]
exact sum_sq_le_of_mem_box hx
· rw [card_range, _root_.nsmul_eq_mul, mul_div_assoc', cast_add_one, mul_div_cancel_left₀,
card_box]
exact (cast_add_one_pos _).ne'
theorem exists_large_sphere (n d : ℕ) :
∃ k, ((d ^ n :) / (n * d ^ 2 :) : ℝ) ≤ #(sphere n d k) := by
obtain ⟨k, -, hk⟩ := exists_large_sphere_aux n d
refine ⟨k, ?_⟩
obtain rfl | hn := n.eq_zero_or_pos
· simp
obtain rfl | hd := d.eq_zero_or_pos
· simp
refine (div_le_div_of_nonneg_left ?_ ?_ ?_).trans hk
· exact cast_nonneg _
· exact cast_add_one_pos _
simp only [← le_sub_iff_add_le', cast_mul, ← mul_sub, cast_pow, cast_sub hd, sub_sq, one_pow,
cast_one, mul_one, sub_add, sub_sub_self]
apply one_le_mul_of_one_le_of_one_le
· rwa [one_le_cast]
rw [_root_.le_sub_iff_add_le]
norm_num
exact one_le_cast.2 hd
theorem bound_aux' (n d : ℕ) : ((d ^ n :) / (n * d ^ 2 :) : ℝ) ≤ rothNumberNat ((2 * d - 1) ^ n) :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := exists_large_sphere n d
h.trans <| cast_le.2 <| card_sphere_le_rothNumberNat _ _ _
theorem bound_aux (hd : d ≠ 0) (hn : 2 ≤ n) :
(d ^ (n - 2 :) / n : ℝ) ≤ rothNumberNat ((2 * d - 1) ^ n) := by
convert bound_aux' n d using 1
rw [cast_mul, cast_pow, mul_comm, ← div_div, pow_sub₀ _ _ hn, ← div_eq_mul_inv, cast_pow]
rwa [cast_ne_zero]
open scoped Filter Topology
open Real
section NumericalBounds
theorem log_two_mul_two_le_sqrt_log_eight : log 2 * 2 ≤ √(log 8) := by
have : (8 : ℝ) = 2 ^ ((3 : ℕ) : ℝ) := by rw [rpow_natCast]; norm_num
rw [this, log_rpow zero_lt_two (3 : ℕ)]
apply le_sqrt_of_sq_le
rw [mul_pow, sq (log 2), mul_assoc, mul_comm]
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ?_ (log_nonneg one_le_two)
rw [← le_div_iff₀]
on_goal 1 => apply log_two_lt_d9.le.trans
all_goals norm_num1
theorem two_div_one_sub_two_div_e_le_eight : 2 / (1 - 2 / exp 1) ≤ 8 := by
rw [div_le_iff₀, mul_sub, mul_one, mul_div_assoc', le_sub_comm, div_le_iff₀ (exp_pos _)]
· linarith [exp_one_gt_d9]
rw [sub_pos, div_lt_one] <;> exact exp_one_gt_d9.trans' (by norm_num)
theorem le_sqrt_log (hN : 4096 ≤ N) : log (2 / (1 - 2 / exp 1)) * (69 / 50) ≤ √(log ↑N) := by
have : (12 : ℕ) * log 2 ≤ log N := by
rw [← log_rpow zero_lt_two, rpow_natCast]
exact log_le_log (by positivity) (mod_cast hN)
refine (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (log_le_log ?_ two_div_one_sub_two_div_e_le_eight) <| by
norm_num1).trans ?_
· refine div_pos zero_lt_two ?_
rw [sub_pos, div_lt_one (exp_pos _)]
exact exp_one_gt_d9.trans_le' (by norm_num1)
have l8 : log 8 = (3 : ℕ) * log 2 := by
rw [← log_rpow zero_lt_two, rpow_natCast]
norm_num
rw [l8]
apply le_sqrt_of_sq_le (le_trans _ this)
rw [mul_right_comm, mul_pow, sq (log 2), ← mul_assoc]
apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right _ (log_nonneg one_le_two)
rw [← le_div_iff₀']
· exact log_two_lt_d9.le.trans (by norm_num1)
exact sq_pos_of_ne_zero (by norm_num1)
theorem exp_neg_two_mul_le {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : exp (-2 * x) < exp (2 - ⌈x⌉₊) / ⌈x⌉₊ := by
have h₁ := ceil_lt_add_one hx.le
have h₂ : 1 - x ≤ 2 - ⌈x⌉₊ := by linarith
calc
_ ≤ exp (1 - x) / (x + 1) := ?_
_ ≤ exp (2 - ⌈x⌉₊) / (x + 1) := by gcongr
_ < _ := by gcongr
rw [le_div_iff₀ (add_pos hx zero_lt_one), ← le_div_iff₀' (exp_pos _), ← exp_sub, neg_mul,
sub_neg_eq_add, two_mul, sub_add_add_cancel, add_comm _ x]
exact le_trans (le_add_of_nonneg_right zero_le_one) (add_one_le_exp _)
theorem div_lt_floor {x : ℝ} (hx : 2 / (1 - 2 / exp 1) ≤ x) : x / exp 1 < (⌊x / 2⌋₊ : ℝ) := by
apply lt_of_le_of_lt _ (sub_one_lt_floor _)
have : 0 < 1 - 2 / exp 1 := by
rw [sub_pos, div_lt_one (exp_pos _)]
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (by norm_num) exp_one_gt_d9
rwa [le_sub_comm, div_eq_mul_one_div x, div_eq_mul_one_div x, ← mul_sub, div_sub', ←
div_eq_mul_one_div, mul_div_assoc', one_le_div, ← div_le_iff₀ this]
· exact zero_lt_two
· exact two_ne_zero
theorem ceil_lt_mul {x : ℝ} (hx : 50 / 19 ≤ x) : (⌈x⌉₊ : ℝ) < 1.38 * x := by
refine (ceil_lt_add_one <| hx.trans' <| by norm_num).trans_le ?_
rw [← le_sub_iff_add_le', ← sub_one_mul]
have : (1.38 : ℝ) = 69 / 50 := by norm_num
rwa [this, show (69 / 50 - 1 : ℝ) = (50 / 19)⁻¹ by norm_num1, ←
div_eq_inv_mul, one_le_div]
norm_num1
end NumericalBounds
/-- The (almost) optimal value of `n` in `Behrend.bound_aux`. -/
noncomputable def nValue (N : ℕ) : ℕ :=
⌈√(log N)⌉₊
/-- The (almost) optimal value of `d` in `Behrend.bound_aux`. -/
noncomputable def dValue (N : ℕ) : ℕ := ⌊(N : ℝ) ^ (nValue N : ℝ)⁻¹ / 2⌋₊
theorem nValue_pos (hN : 2 ≤ N) : 0 < nValue N :=
ceil_pos.2 <| Real.sqrt_pos.2 <| log_pos <| one_lt_cast.2 <| hN
theorem three_le_nValue (hN : 64 ≤ N) : 3 ≤ nValue N := by
rw [nValue, ← lt_iff_add_one_le, lt_ceil, cast_two]
apply lt_sqrt_of_sq_lt
have : (2 : ℝ) ^ ((6 : ℕ) : ℝ) ≤ N := by
rw [rpow_natCast]
exact (cast_le.2 hN).trans' (by norm_num1)
apply lt_of_lt_of_le _ (log_le_log (rpow_pos_of_pos zero_lt_two _) this)
rw [log_rpow zero_lt_two, ← div_lt_iff₀']
· exact log_two_gt_d9.trans_le' (by norm_num1)
· norm_num1
theorem dValue_pos (hN₃ : 8 ≤ N) : 0 < dValue N := by
have hN₀ : 0 < (N : ℝ) := cast_pos.2 (succ_pos'.trans_le hN₃)
rw [dValue, floor_pos, ← log_le_log_iff zero_lt_one, log_one, log_div _ two_ne_zero, log_rpow hN₀,
inv_mul_eq_div, sub_nonneg, le_div_iff₀]
· have : (nValue N : ℝ) ≤ 2 * √(log N) := by
apply (ceil_lt_add_one <| sqrt_nonneg _).le.trans
rw [two_mul, add_le_add_iff_left]
apply le_sqrt_of_sq_le
rw [one_pow, le_log_iff_exp_le hN₀]
exact (exp_one_lt_d9.le.trans <| by norm_num).trans (cast_le.2 hN₃)
apply (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left this <| log_nonneg one_le_two).trans _
rw [← mul_assoc, ← le_div_iff₀ (Real.sqrt_pos.2 <| log_pos <| one_lt_cast.2 _), div_sqrt]
· apply log_two_mul_two_le_sqrt_log_eight.trans
apply Real.sqrt_le_sqrt
exact log_le_log (by norm_num) (mod_cast hN₃)
exact hN₃.trans_lt' (by norm_num)
· exact cast_pos.2 (nValue_pos <| hN₃.trans' <| by norm_num)
· exact (rpow_pos_of_pos hN₀ _).ne'
· exact div_pos (rpow_pos_of_pos hN₀ _) zero_lt_two
theorem le_N (hN : 2 ≤ N) : (2 * dValue N - 1) ^ nValue N ≤ N := by
have : (2 * dValue N - 1) ^ nValue N ≤ (2 * dValue N) ^ nValue N :=
Nat.pow_le_pow_left (Nat.sub_le _ _) _
apply this.trans
suffices ((2 * dValue N) ^ nValue N : ℝ) ≤ N from mod_cast this
suffices i : (2 * dValue N : ℝ) ≤ (N : ℝ) ^ (nValue N : ℝ)⁻¹ by
rw [← rpow_natCast]
apply (rpow_le_rpow (mul_nonneg zero_le_two (cast_nonneg _)) i (cast_nonneg _)).trans
rw [← rpow_mul (cast_nonneg _), inv_mul_cancel₀, rpow_one]
rw [cast_ne_zero]
apply (nValue_pos hN).ne'
rw [← le_div_iff₀']
· exact floor_le (div_nonneg (rpow_nonneg (cast_nonneg _) _) zero_le_two)
apply zero_lt_two
theorem bound (hN : 4096 ≤ N) : (N : ℝ) ^ (nValue N : ℝ)⁻¹ / exp 1 < dValue N := by
apply div_lt_floor _
rw [← log_le_log_iff, log_rpow, mul_comm, ← div_eq_mul_inv]
· apply le_trans _ (div_le_div_of_nonneg_left _ _ (ceil_lt_mul _).le)
· rw [mul_comm, ← div_div, div_sqrt, le_div_iff₀]
· norm_num; exact le_sqrt_log hN
· norm_num1
· apply log_nonneg
rw [one_le_cast]
exact hN.trans' (by norm_num1)
· rw [cast_pos, lt_ceil, cast_zero, Real.sqrt_pos]
refine log_pos ?_
rw [one_lt_cast]
exact hN.trans_lt' (by norm_num1)
| apply le_sqrt_of_sq_le
have : (12 : ℕ) * log 2 ≤ log N := by
rw [← log_rpow zero_lt_two, rpow_natCast]
exact log_le_log (by positivity) (mod_cast hN)
refine le_trans ?_ this
rw [← div_le_iff₀']
· exact log_two_gt_d9.le.trans' (by norm_num1)
· norm_num1
· rw [cast_pos]
exact hN.trans_lt' (by norm_num1)
· refine div_pos zero_lt_two ?_
rw [sub_pos, div_lt_one (exp_pos _)]
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (by norm_num1) exp_one_gt_d9
positivity
theorem roth_lower_bound_explicit (hN : 4096 ≤ N) :
(N : ℝ) * exp (-4 * √(log N)) < rothNumberNat N := by
let n := nValue N
have hn : 0 < (n : ℝ) := cast_pos.2 (nValue_pos <| hN.trans' <| by norm_num1)
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Additive/AP/Three/Behrend.lean | 412 | 430 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Control.EquivFunctor
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Subtype
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Defs
/-!
# Equivalences for `Option α`
We define
* `Equiv.optionCongr`: the `Option α ≃ Option β` constructed from `e : α ≃ β` by sending `none` to
`none`, and applying `e` elsewhere.
* `Equiv.removeNone`: the `α ≃ β` constructed from `Option α ≃ Option β` by removing `none` from
both sides.
-/
universe u
namespace Equiv
open Option
variable {α β γ : Type*}
section OptionCongr
/-- A universe-polymorphic version of `EquivFunctor.mapEquiv Option e`. -/
@[simps apply]
def optionCongr (e : α ≃ β) : Option α ≃ Option β where
toFun := Option.map e
invFun := Option.map e.symm
left_inv x := (Option.map_map _ _ _).trans <| e.symm_comp_self.symm ▸ congr_fun Option.map_id x
right_inv x := (Option.map_map _ _ _).trans <| e.self_comp_symm.symm ▸ congr_fun Option.map_id x
@[simp]
theorem optionCongr_refl : optionCongr (Equiv.refl α) = Equiv.refl _ :=
ext <| congr_fun Option.map_id
@[simp]
theorem optionCongr_symm (e : α ≃ β) : (optionCongr e).symm = optionCongr e.symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem optionCongr_trans (e₁ : α ≃ β) (e₂ : β ≃ γ) :
(optionCongr e₁).trans (optionCongr e₂) = optionCongr (e₁.trans e₂) :=
ext <| Option.map_map _ _
/-- When `α` and `β` are in the same universe, this is the same as the result of
`EquivFunctor.mapEquiv`. -/
theorem optionCongr_eq_equivFunctor_mapEquiv {α β : Type u} (e : α ≃ β) :
optionCongr e = EquivFunctor.mapEquiv Option e :=
rfl
end OptionCongr
section RemoveNone
variable (e : Option α ≃ Option β)
/-- If we have a value on one side of an `Equiv` of `Option`
we also have a value on the other side of the equivalence
-/
def removeNone_aux (x : α) : β :=
if h : (e (some x)).isSome then Option.get _ h
else
Option.get _ <|
show (e none).isSome by
rw [← Option.ne_none_iff_isSome]
intro hn
rw [Option.not_isSome_iff_eq_none, ← hn] at h
exact Option.some_ne_none _ (e.injective h)
theorem removeNone_aux_some {x : α} (h : ∃ x', e (some x) = some x') :
some (removeNone_aux e x) = e (some x) := by
simp [removeNone_aux, Option.isSome_iff_exists.mpr h]
theorem removeNone_aux_none {x : α} (h : e (some x) = none) :
some (removeNone_aux e x) = e none := by
simp [removeNone_aux, Option.not_isSome_iff_eq_none.mpr h]
theorem removeNone_aux_inv (x : α) : removeNone_aux e.symm (removeNone_aux e x) = x :=
Option.some_injective _
(by
cases h1 : e.symm (some (removeNone_aux e x)) <;> cases h2 : e (some x)
· rw [removeNone_aux_none _ h1]
exact (e.eq_symm_apply.mpr h2).symm
· rw [removeNone_aux_some _ ⟨_, h2⟩] at h1
simp at h1
· rw [removeNone_aux_none _ h2] at h1
simp at h1
· rw [removeNone_aux_some _ ⟨_, h1⟩]
rw [removeNone_aux_some _ ⟨_, h2⟩]
simp)
/-- Given an equivalence between two `Option` types, eliminate `none` from that equivalence by
mapping `e.symm none` to `e none`. -/
def removeNone : α ≃ β where
toFun := removeNone_aux e
invFun := removeNone_aux e.symm
left_inv := removeNone_aux_inv e
right_inv := removeNone_aux_inv e.symm
@[simp]
theorem removeNone_symm : (removeNone e).symm = removeNone e.symm :=
rfl
theorem removeNone_some {x : α} (h : ∃ x', e (some x) = some x') :
some (removeNone e x) = e (some x) :=
removeNone_aux_some e h
theorem removeNone_none {x : α} (h : e (some x) = none) : some (removeNone e x) = e none :=
removeNone_aux_none e h
@[simp]
theorem option_symm_apply_none_iff : e.symm none = none ↔ e none = none :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using (congr_arg e h).symm, fun h => by simpa using (congr_arg e.symm h).symm⟩
theorem some_removeNone_iff {x : α} : some (removeNone e x) = e none ↔ e.symm none = some x := by
rcases h : e (some x) with a | a
· rw [removeNone_none _ h]
simpa using (congr_arg e.symm h).symm
· rw [removeNone_some _ ⟨a, h⟩]
have h1 := congr_arg e.symm h
rw [symm_apply_apply] at h1
simp only [apply_eq_iff_eq, reduceCtorEq]
simp [h1, apply_eq_iff_eq]
@[simp]
theorem removeNone_optionCongr (e : α ≃ β) : removeNone e.optionCongr = e :=
Equiv.ext fun x => Option.some_injective _ <| removeNone_some _ ⟨e x, by simp [EquivFunctor.map]⟩
end RemoveNone
theorem optionCongr_injective : Function.Injective (optionCongr : α ≃ β → Option α ≃ Option β) :=
Function.LeftInverse.injective removeNone_optionCongr
/-- Equivalences between `Option α` and `β` that send `none` to `x` are equivalent to
equivalences between `α` and `{y : β // y ≠ x}`. -/
def optionSubtype [DecidableEq β] (x : β) :
{ e : Option α ≃ β // e none = x } ≃ (α ≃ { y : β // y ≠ x }) where
toFun e :=
{ toFun := fun a =>
⟨(e : Option α ≃ β) a, ((EquivLike.injective _).ne_iff' e.property).2 (some_ne_none _)⟩,
invFun := fun b =>
get _
(ne_none_iff_isSome.1
(((EquivLike.injective _).ne_iff'
((apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply _).1 e.property).symm).2 b.property)),
left_inv := fun a => by
rw [← some_inj, some_get]
exact symm_apply_apply (e : Option α ≃ β) a,
| right_inv := fun b => by
ext
| Mathlib/Logic/Equiv/Option.lean | 160 | 161 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Wrenna Robson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.FieldDivision
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Vandermonde
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Basic
/-!
# Lagrange interpolation
## Main definitions
* In everything that follows, `s : Finset ι` is a finite set of indexes, with `v : ι → F` an
indexing of the field over some type. We call the image of v on s the interpolation nodes,
though strictly unique nodes are only defined when v is injective on s.
* `Lagrange.basisDivisor x y`, with `x y : F`. These are the normalised irreducible factors of
the Lagrange basis polynomials. They evaluate to `1` at `x` and `0` at `y` when `x` and `y`
are distinct.
* `Lagrange.basis v i` with `i : ι`: the Lagrange basis polynomial that evaluates to `1` at `v i`
and `0` at `v j` for `i ≠ j`.
* `Lagrange.interpolate v r` where `r : ι → F` is a function from the fintype to the field: the
Lagrange interpolant that evaluates to `r i` at `x i` for all `i : ι`. The `r i` are the _values_
associated with the _nodes_`x i`.
-/
open Polynomial
section PolynomialDetermination
namespace Polynomial
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] {f g : R[X]}
section Finset
open Function Fintype
open scoped Finset
variable (s : Finset R)
theorem eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_finset_eq_zero (degree_f_lt : f.degree < #s)
(eval_f : ∀ x ∈ s, f.eval x = 0) : f = 0 := by
rw [← mem_degreeLT] at degree_f_lt
simp_rw [eval_eq_sum_degreeLTEquiv degree_f_lt] at eval_f
rw [← degreeLTEquiv_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero degree_f_lt]
exact
Matrix.eq_zero_of_forall_index_sum_mul_pow_eq_zero
(Injective.comp (Embedding.subtype _).inj' (equivFinOfCardEq (card_coe _)).symm.injective)
fun _ => eval_f _ (Finset.coe_mem _)
theorem eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_finset_eq (degree_fg_lt : (f - g).degree < #s)
(eval_fg : ∀ x ∈ s, f.eval x = g.eval x) : f = g := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
refine eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_finset_eq_zero _ degree_fg_lt ?_
simp_rw [eval_sub, sub_eq_zero]
exact eval_fg
theorem eq_of_degrees_lt_of_eval_finset_eq (degree_f_lt : f.degree < #s)
(degree_g_lt : g.degree < #s) (eval_fg : ∀ x ∈ s, f.eval x = g.eval x) : f = g := by
rw [← mem_degreeLT] at degree_f_lt degree_g_lt
refine eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_finset_eq _ ?_ eval_fg
rw [← mem_degreeLT]; exact Submodule.sub_mem _ degree_f_lt degree_g_lt
/--
Two polynomials, with the same degree and leading coefficient, which have the same evaluation
on a set of distinct values with cardinality equal to the degree, are equal.
-/
theorem eq_of_degree_le_of_eval_finset_eq
(h_deg_le : f.degree ≤ #s)
(h_deg_eq : f.degree = g.degree)
(hlc : f.leadingCoeff = g.leadingCoeff)
(h_eval : ∀ x ∈ s, f.eval x = g.eval x) :
f = g := by
rcases eq_or_ne f 0 with rfl | hf
· rwa [degree_zero, eq_comm, degree_eq_bot, eq_comm] at h_deg_eq
· exact eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_finset_eq s
(lt_of_lt_of_le (degree_sub_lt h_deg_eq hf hlc) h_deg_le) h_eval
end Finset
section Indexed
open Finset
variable {ι : Type*} {v : ι → R} (s : Finset ι)
theorem eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_index_eq_zero (hvs : Set.InjOn v s)
(degree_f_lt : f.degree < #s) (eval_f : ∀ i ∈ s, f.eval (v i) = 0) : f = 0 := by
classical
rw [← card_image_of_injOn hvs] at degree_f_lt
refine eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_finset_eq_zero _ degree_f_lt ?_
intro x hx
rcases mem_image.mp hx with ⟨_, hj, rfl⟩
exact eval_f _ hj
theorem eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_index_eq (hvs : Set.InjOn v s)
(degree_fg_lt : (f - g).degree < #s) (eval_fg : ∀ i ∈ s, f.eval (v i) = g.eval (v i)) :
f = g := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
refine eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_index_eq_zero _ hvs degree_fg_lt ?_
simp_rw [eval_sub, sub_eq_zero]
exact eval_fg
theorem eq_of_degrees_lt_of_eval_index_eq (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (degree_f_lt : f.degree < #s)
(degree_g_lt : g.degree < #s) (eval_fg : ∀ i ∈ s, f.eval (v i) = g.eval (v i)) : f = g := by
refine eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_index_eq _ hvs ?_ eval_fg
rw [← mem_degreeLT] at degree_f_lt degree_g_lt ⊢
exact Submodule.sub_mem _ degree_f_lt degree_g_lt
theorem eq_of_degree_le_of_eval_index_eq (hvs : Set.InjOn v s)
(h_deg_le : f.degree ≤ #s)
(h_deg_eq : f.degree = g.degree)
(hlc : f.leadingCoeff = g.leadingCoeff)
(h_eval : ∀ i ∈ s, f.eval (v i) = g.eval (v i)) : f = g := by
rcases eq_or_ne f 0 with rfl | hf
· rwa [degree_zero, eq_comm, degree_eq_bot, eq_comm] at h_deg_eq
· exact eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_index_eq s hvs
(lt_of_lt_of_le (degree_sub_lt h_deg_eq hf hlc) h_deg_le)
h_eval
end Indexed
end Polynomial
end PolynomialDetermination
noncomputable section
namespace Lagrange
open Polynomial
section BasisDivisor
variable {F : Type*} [Field F]
variable {x y : F}
/-- `basisDivisor x y` is the unique linear or constant polynomial such that
when evaluated at `x` it gives `1` and `y` it gives `0` (where when `x = y` it is identically `0`).
Such polynomials are the building blocks for the Lagrange interpolants. -/
def basisDivisor (x y : F) : F[X] :=
C (x - y)⁻¹ * (X - C y)
theorem basisDivisor_self : basisDivisor x x = 0 := by
simp only [basisDivisor, sub_self, inv_zero, map_zero, zero_mul]
theorem basisDivisor_inj (hxy : basisDivisor x y = 0) : x = y := by
simp_rw [basisDivisor, mul_eq_zero, X_sub_C_ne_zero, or_false, C_eq_zero, inv_eq_zero,
sub_eq_zero] at hxy
exact hxy
@[simp]
theorem basisDivisor_eq_zero_iff : basisDivisor x y = 0 ↔ x = y :=
⟨basisDivisor_inj, fun H => H ▸ basisDivisor_self⟩
theorem basisDivisor_ne_zero_iff : basisDivisor x y ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ y := by
rw [Ne, basisDivisor_eq_zero_iff]
theorem degree_basisDivisor_of_ne (hxy : x ≠ y) : (basisDivisor x y).degree = 1 := by
rw [basisDivisor, degree_mul, degree_X_sub_C, degree_C, zero_add]
exact inv_ne_zero (sub_ne_zero_of_ne hxy)
@[simp]
theorem degree_basisDivisor_self : (basisDivisor x x).degree = ⊥ := by
rw [basisDivisor_self, degree_zero]
theorem natDegree_basisDivisor_self : (basisDivisor x x).natDegree = 0 := by
rw [basisDivisor_self, natDegree_zero]
theorem natDegree_basisDivisor_of_ne (hxy : x ≠ y) : (basisDivisor x y).natDegree = 1 :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some (degree_basisDivisor_of_ne hxy)
@[simp]
theorem eval_basisDivisor_right : eval y (basisDivisor x y) = 0 := by
simp only [basisDivisor, eval_mul, eval_C, eval_sub, eval_X, sub_self, mul_zero]
theorem eval_basisDivisor_left_of_ne (hxy : x ≠ y) : eval x (basisDivisor x y) = 1 := by
simp only [basisDivisor, eval_mul, eval_C, eval_sub, eval_X]
exact inv_mul_cancel₀ (sub_ne_zero_of_ne hxy)
end BasisDivisor
section Basis
variable {F : Type*} [Field F] {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι]
variable {s : Finset ι} {v : ι → F} {i j : ι}
open Finset
/-- Lagrange basis polynomials indexed by `s : Finset ι`, defined at nodes `v i` for a
map `v : ι → F`. For `i, j ∈ s`, `basis s v i` evaluates to 0 at `v j` for `i ≠ j`. When
`v` is injective on `s`, `basis s v i` evaluates to 1 at `v i`. -/
protected def basis (s : Finset ι) (v : ι → F) (i : ι) : F[X] :=
∏ j ∈ s.erase i, basisDivisor (v i) (v j)
@[simp]
theorem basis_empty : Lagrange.basis ∅ v i = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem basis_singleton (i : ι) : Lagrange.basis {i} v i = 1 := by
rw [Lagrange.basis, erase_singleton, prod_empty]
@[simp]
theorem basis_pair_left (hij : i ≠ j) : Lagrange.basis {i, j} v i = basisDivisor (v i) (v j) := by
simp only [Lagrange.basis, hij, erase_insert_eq_erase, erase_eq_of_not_mem, mem_singleton,
not_false_iff, prod_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem basis_pair_right (hij : i ≠ j) : Lagrange.basis {i, j} v j = basisDivisor (v j) (v i) := by
rw [pair_comm]
exact basis_pair_left hij.symm
theorem basis_ne_zero (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hi : i ∈ s) : Lagrange.basis s v i ≠ 0 := by
simp_rw [Lagrange.basis, prod_ne_zero_iff, Ne, mem_erase]
rintro j ⟨hij, hj⟩
rw [basisDivisor_eq_zero_iff, hvs.eq_iff hi hj]
exact hij.symm
@[simp]
theorem eval_basis_self (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hi : i ∈ s) :
(Lagrange.basis s v i).eval (v i) = 1 := by
rw [Lagrange.basis, eval_prod]
refine prod_eq_one fun j H => ?_
rw [eval_basisDivisor_left_of_ne]
rcases mem_erase.mp H with ⟨hij, hj⟩
exact mt (hvs hi hj) hij.symm
@[simp]
theorem eval_basis_of_ne (hij : i ≠ j) (hj : j ∈ s) : (Lagrange.basis s v i).eval (v j) = 0 := by
| simp_rw [Lagrange.basis, eval_prod, prod_eq_zero_iff]
exact ⟨j, ⟨mem_erase.mpr ⟨hij.symm, hj⟩, eval_basisDivisor_right⟩⟩
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Lagrange.lean | 233 | 235 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Kenny Lau, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro, Kevin Buzzard,
Amelia Livingston, Yury Kudryashov, Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subsemigroup.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice.Image
/-!
# Subsemigroups: `CompleteLattice` structure
This file defines a `CompleteLattice` structure on `Subsemigroup`s,
and define the closure of a set as the minimal subsemigroup that includes this set.
## Main definitions
For each of the following definitions in the `Subsemigroup` namespace, there is a corresponding
definition in the `AddSubsemigroup` namespace.
* `Subsemigroup.copy` : copy of a subsemigroup with `carrier` replaced by a set that is equal but
possibly not definitionally equal to the carrier of the original `Subsemigroup`.
* `Subsemigroup.closure` : semigroup closure of a set, i.e.,
the least subsemigroup that includes the set.
* `Subsemigroup.gi` : `closure : Set M → Subsemigroup M` and coercion `coe : Subsemigroup M → Set M`
form a `GaloisInsertion`;
## Implementation notes
Subsemigroup inclusion is denoted `≤` rather than `⊆`, although `∈` is defined as
membership of a subsemigroup's underlying set.
Note that `Subsemigroup M` does not actually require `Semigroup M`,
instead requiring only the weaker `Mul M`.
This file is designed to have very few dependencies. In particular, it should not use natural
numbers.
## Tags
subsemigroup, subsemigroups
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
-- Only needed for notation
variable {M : Type*} {N : Type*}
section NonAssoc
variable [Mul M] {s : Set M}
namespace Subsemigroup
variable (S : Subsemigroup M)
@[to_additive]
instance : InfSet (Subsemigroup M) :=
⟨fun s =>
{ carrier := ⋂ t ∈ s, ↑t
mul_mem' := fun hx hy =>
Set.mem_biInter fun i h =>
i.mul_mem (by apply Set.mem_iInter₂.1 hx i h) (by apply Set.mem_iInter₂.1 hy i h) }⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_sInf (S : Set (Subsemigroup M)) : ((sInf S : Subsemigroup M) : Set M) = ⋂ s ∈ S, ↑s :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_sInf {S : Set (Subsemigroup M)} {x : M} : x ∈ sInf S ↔ ∀ p ∈ S, x ∈ p :=
Set.mem_iInter₂
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_iInf {ι : Sort*} {S : ι → Subsemigroup M} {x : M} : (x ∈ ⨅ i, S i) ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ S i := by
simp only [iInf, mem_sInf, Set.forall_mem_range]
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_iInf {ι : Sort*} {S : ι → Subsemigroup M} : (↑(⨅ i, S i) : Set M) = ⋂ i, S i := by
simp only [iInf, coe_sInf, Set.biInter_range]
/-- subsemigroups of a monoid form a complete lattice. -/
@[to_additive "The `AddSubsemigroup`s of an `AddMonoid` form a complete lattice."]
instance : CompleteLattice (Subsemigroup M) :=
{ completeLatticeOfInf (Subsemigroup M) fun _ =>
IsGLB.of_image SetLike.coe_subset_coe isGLB_biInf with
le := (· ≤ ·)
lt := (· < ·)
bot := ⊥
bot_le := fun _ _ hx => (not_mem_bot hx).elim
top := ⊤
le_top := fun _ x _ => mem_top x
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
sInf := InfSet.sInf
le_inf := fun _ _ _ ha hb _ hx => ⟨ha hx, hb hx⟩
inf_le_left := fun _ _ _ => And.left
inf_le_right := fun _ _ _ => And.right }
/-- The `Subsemigroup` generated by a set. -/
@[to_additive "The `AddSubsemigroup` generated by a set"]
def closure (s : Set M) : Subsemigroup M :=
sInf { S | s ⊆ S }
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_closure {x : M} : x ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ S : Subsemigroup M, s ⊆ S → x ∈ S :=
mem_sInf
/-- The subsemigroup generated by a set includes the set. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp, aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [SetLike]))
"The `AddSubsemigroup` generated by a set includes the set."]
theorem subset_closure : s ⊆ closure s := fun _ hx => mem_closure.2 fun _ hS => hS hx
@[to_additive]
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_closure {P : M} (hP : P ∉ closure s) : P ∉ s := fun h =>
hP (subset_closure h)
variable {S}
open Set
/-- A subsemigroup `S` includes `closure s` if and only if it includes `s`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"An additive subsemigroup `S` includes `closure s` if and only if it includes `s`"]
theorem closure_le : closure s ≤ S ↔ s ⊆ S :=
⟨Subset.trans subset_closure, fun h => sInf_le h⟩
/-- subsemigroup closure of a set is monotone in its argument: if `s ⊆ t`,
then `closure s ≤ closure t`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) "Additive subsemigroup closure of a set is monotone in its argument:
if `s ⊆ t`, then `closure s ≤ closure t`"]
theorem closure_mono ⦃s t : Set M⦄ (h : s ⊆ t) : closure s ≤ closure t :=
closure_le.2 <| Subset.trans h subset_closure
@[to_additive]
theorem closure_eq_of_le (h₁ : s ⊆ S) (h₂ : S ≤ closure s) : closure s = S :=
le_antisymm (closure_le.2 h₁) h₂
variable (S)
/-- An induction principle for closure membership. If `p` holds for all elements of `s`, and
is preserved under multiplication, then `p` holds for all elements of the closure of `s`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim) "An induction principle for additive closure membership. If `p`
holds for all elements of `s`, and is preserved under addition, then `p` holds for all
elements of the additive closure of `s`."]
theorem closure_induction {p : (x : M) → x ∈ closure s → Prop}
(mem : ∀ (x) (h : x ∈ s), p x (subset_closure h))
(mul : ∀ x y hx hy, p x hx → p y hy → p (x * y) (mul_mem hx hy)) {x} (hx : x ∈ closure s) :
p x hx :=
let S : Subsemigroup M :=
{ carrier := { x | ∃ hx, p x hx }
mul_mem' := fun ⟨_, hpx⟩ ⟨_, hpy⟩ ↦ ⟨_, mul _ _ _ _ hpx hpy⟩ }
closure_le (S := S) |>.mpr (fun y hy ↦ ⟨subset_closure hy, mem y hy⟩) hx |>.elim fun _ ↦ id
/-- An induction principle for closure membership for predicates with two arguments. -/
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim) "An induction principle for additive closure membership for
predicates with two arguments."]
theorem closure_induction₂ {p : (x y : M) → x ∈ closure s → y ∈ closure s → Prop}
(mem : ∀ (x) (y) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s), p x y (subset_closure hx) (subset_closure hy))
(mul_left : ∀ x y z hx hy hz, p x z hx hz → p y z hy hz → p (x * y) z (mul_mem hx hy) hz)
(mul_right : ∀ x y z hx hy hz, p z x hz hx → p z y hz hy → p z (x * y) hz (mul_mem hx hy))
{x y : M} (hx : x ∈ closure s) (hy : y ∈ closure s) : p x y hx hy := by
induction hx using closure_induction with
| mem z hz => induction hy using closure_induction with
| mem _ h => exact mem _ _ hz h
| mul _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => exact mul_right _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂
| mul _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => exact mul_left _ _ _ _ _ hy h₁ h₂
/-- If `s` is a dense set in a magma `M`, `Subsemigroup.closure s = ⊤`, then in order to prove that
some predicate `p` holds for all `x : M` it suffices to verify `p x` for `x ∈ s`,
and verify that `p x` and `p y` imply `p (x * y)`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim) "If `s` is a dense set in an additive monoid `M`,
`AddSubsemigroup.closure s = ⊤`, then in order to prove that some predicate `p` holds
for all `x : M` it suffices to verify `p x` for `x ∈ s`, and verify that `p x` and `p y` imply
`p (x + y)`."]
theorem dense_induction {p : M → Prop} (s : Set M) (closure : closure s = ⊤)
(mem : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) (mul : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x * y)) (x : M) :
p x := by
induction closure.symm ▸ mem_top x using closure_induction with
| mem _ h => exact mem _ h
| mul _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => exact mul _ _ h₁ h₂
/- The argument `s : Set M` is explicit in `Subsemigroup.dense_induction` because the type of the
induction variable, namely `x : M`, does not reference `x`. Making `s` explicit allows the user
to apply the induction principle while deferring the proof of `closure s = ⊤` without creating
metavariables, as in the following example. -/
example {p : M → Prop} (s : Set M) (closure : closure s = ⊤)
(mem : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) (mul : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x * y)) (x : M) :
p x := by
induction x using dense_induction s with
| closure => exact closure
| mem x hx => exact mem x hx
| mul _ _ h₁ h₂ => exact mul _ _ h₁ h₂
variable (M)
/-- `closure` forms a Galois insertion with the coercion to set. -/
@[to_additive "`closure` forms a Galois insertion with the coercion to set."]
protected def gi : GaloisInsertion (@closure M _) SetLike.coe :=
GaloisConnection.toGaloisInsertion (fun _ _ => closure_le) fun _ => subset_closure
variable {M}
/-- Closure of a subsemigroup `S` equals `S`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Additive closure of an additive subsemigroup `S` equals `S`"]
theorem closure_eq : closure (S : Set M) = S :=
(Subsemigroup.gi M).l_u_eq S
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem closure_empty : closure (∅ : Set M) = ⊥ :=
(Subsemigroup.gi M).gc.l_bot
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem closure_univ : closure (univ : Set M) = ⊤ :=
@coe_top M _ ▸ closure_eq ⊤
@[to_additive]
theorem closure_union (s t : Set M) : closure (s ∪ t) = closure s ⊔ closure t :=
(Subsemigroup.gi M).gc.l_sup
@[to_additive]
theorem closure_iUnion {ι} (s : ι → Set M) : closure (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, closure (s i) :=
(Subsemigroup.gi M).gc.l_iSup
@[to_additive]
theorem closure_singleton_le_iff_mem (m : M) (p : Subsemigroup M) : closure {m} ≤ p ↔ m ∈ p := by
rw [closure_le, singleton_subset_iff, SetLike.mem_coe]
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_iSup {ι : Sort*} (p : ι → Subsemigroup M) {m : M} :
(m ∈ ⨆ i, p i) ↔ ∀ N, (∀ i, p i ≤ N) → m ∈ N := by
rw [← closure_singleton_le_iff_mem, le_iSup_iff]
simp only [closure_singleton_le_iff_mem]
@[to_additive]
theorem iSup_eq_closure {ι : Sort*} (p : ι → Subsemigroup M) :
⨆ i, p i = Subsemigroup.closure (⋃ i, (p i : Set M)) := by
simp_rw [Subsemigroup.closure_iUnion, Subsemigroup.closure_eq]
end Subsemigroup
namespace MulHom
variable [Mul N]
open Subsemigroup
/-- If two mul homomorphisms are equal on a set, then they are equal on its subsemigroup closure. -/
@[to_additive "If two add homomorphisms are equal on a set,
then they are equal on its additive subsemigroup closure."]
theorem eqOn_closure {f g : M →ₙ* N} {s : Set M} (h : Set.EqOn f g s) :
Set.EqOn f g (closure s) :=
show closure s ≤ f.eqLocus g from closure_le.2 h
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_of_eqOn_dense {s : Set M} (hs : closure s = ⊤) {f g : M →ₙ* N} (h : s.EqOn f g) :
f = g :=
eq_of_eqOn_top <| hs ▸ eqOn_closure h
end MulHom
end NonAssoc
section Assoc
namespace MulHom
open Subsemigroup
/-- Let `s` be a subset of a semigroup `M` such that the closure of `s` is the whole semigroup.
Then `MulHom.ofDense` defines a mul homomorphism from `M` asking for a proof
of `f (x * y) = f x * f y` only for `y ∈ s`. -/
@[to_additive]
def ofDense {M N} [Semigroup M] [Semigroup N] {s : Set M} (f : M → N) (hs : closure s = ⊤)
(hmul : ∀ (x), ∀ y ∈ s, f (x * y) = f x * f y) :
M →ₙ* N where
toFun := f
map_mul' x y :=
dense_induction _ hs (fun y hy x => hmul x y hy)
(fun y₁ y₂ h₁ h₂ x => by simp only [← mul_assoc, h₁, h₂]) y x
/-- Let `s` be a subset of an additive semigroup `M` such that the closure of `s` is the whole
semigroup. Then `AddHom.ofDense` defines an additive homomorphism from `M` asking for a proof
of `f (x + y) = f x + f y` only for `y ∈ s`. -/
add_decl_doc AddHom.ofDense
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_ofDense [Semigroup M] [Semigroup N] {s : Set M} (f : M → N) (hs : closure s = ⊤)
(hmul) : (ofDense f hs hmul : M → N) = f :=
rfl
end MulHom
end Assoc
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Subsemigroup/Basic.lean | 452 | 455 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Tilted
/-!
# Log-likelihood Ratio
The likelihood ratio between two measures `μ` and `ν` is their Radon-Nikodym derivative
`μ.rnDeriv ν`. The logarithm of that function is often used instead: this is the log-likelihood
ratio.
This file contains a definition of the log-likelihood ratio (llr) and its properties.
## Main definitions
* `llr μ ν`: Log-Likelihood Ratio between `μ` and `ν`, defined as the function
`x ↦ log (μ.rnDeriv ν x).toReal`.
-/
open Real
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {μ ν : Measure α} {f : α → ℝ}
/-- Log-Likelihood Ratio between two measures. -/
noncomputable def llr (μ ν : Measure α) (x : α) : ℝ := log (μ.rnDeriv ν x).toReal
lemma llr_def (μ ν : Measure α) : llr μ ν = fun x ↦ log (μ.rnDeriv ν x).toReal := rfl
lemma llr_self (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] : llr μ μ =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
filter_upwards [μ.rnDeriv_self] with a ha using by simp [llr, ha]
lemma exp_llr (μ ν : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] :
(fun x ↦ exp (llr μ ν x))
=ᵐ[ν] fun x ↦ if μ.rnDeriv ν x = 0 then 1 else (μ.rnDeriv ν x).toReal := by
filter_upwards [Measure.rnDeriv_lt_top μ ν] with x hx
by_cases h_zero : μ.rnDeriv ν x = 0
· simp only [llr, h_zero, ENNReal.toReal_zero, log_zero, exp_zero, ite_true]
· rw [llr, exp_log, if_neg h_zero]
exact ENNReal.toReal_pos h_zero hx.ne
lemma exp_llr_of_ac (μ ν : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] [Measure.HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ ν]
(hμν : μ ≪ ν) :
(fun x ↦ exp (llr μ ν x)) =ᵐ[μ] fun x ↦ (μ.rnDeriv ν x).toReal := by
filter_upwards [hμν.ae_le (exp_llr μ ν), Measure.rnDeriv_pos hμν] with x hx_eq hx_pos
rw [hx_eq, if_neg hx_pos.ne']
lemma exp_llr_of_ac' (μ ν : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] [SigmaFinite ν] (hμν : ν ≪ μ) :
(fun x ↦ exp (llr μ ν x)) =ᵐ[ν] fun x ↦ (μ.rnDeriv ν x).toReal := by
filter_upwards [exp_llr μ ν, Measure.rnDeriv_pos' hμν] with x hx hx_pos
rwa [if_neg hx_pos.ne'] at hx
lemma neg_llr [SigmaFinite μ] [SigmaFinite ν] (hμν : μ ≪ ν) :
- llr μ ν =ᵐ[μ] llr ν μ := by
filter_upwards [Measure.inv_rnDeriv hμν] with x hx
rw [Pi.neg_apply, llr, llr, ← log_inv, ← ENNReal.toReal_inv]
congr
lemma exp_neg_llr [SigmaFinite μ] [SigmaFinite ν] (hμν : μ ≪ ν) :
(fun x ↦ exp (- llr μ ν x)) =ᵐ[μ] fun x ↦ (ν.rnDeriv μ x).toReal := by
filter_upwards [neg_llr hμν, exp_llr_of_ac' ν μ hμν] with x hx hx_exp_log
rw [Pi.neg_apply] at hx
rw [hx, hx_exp_log]
lemma exp_neg_llr' [SigmaFinite μ] [SigmaFinite ν] (hμν : ν ≪ μ) :
(fun x ↦ exp (- llr μ ν x)) =ᵐ[ν] fun x ↦ (ν.rnDeriv μ x).toReal := by
filter_upwards [neg_llr hμν, exp_llr_of_ac ν μ hμν] with x hx hx_exp_log
rw [Pi.neg_apply, neg_eq_iff_eq_neg] at hx
rw [← hx, hx_exp_log]
@[measurability, fun_prop]
lemma measurable_llr (μ ν : Measure α) : Measurable (llr μ ν) :=
(Measure.measurable_rnDeriv μ ν).ennreal_toReal.log
@[measurability]
lemma stronglyMeasurable_llr (μ ν : Measure α) : StronglyMeasurable (llr μ ν) :=
(measurable_llr μ ν).stronglyMeasurable
lemma llr_smul_left [IsFiniteMeasure μ] [Measure.HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ ν]
(hμν : μ ≪ ν) (c : ℝ≥0∞) (hc : c ≠ 0) (hc_ne_top : c ≠ ∞) :
llr (c • μ) ν =ᵐ[μ] fun x ↦ llr μ ν x + log c.toReal := by
simp only [llr, llr_def]
have h := Measure.rnDeriv_smul_left_of_ne_top μ ν hc_ne_top
filter_upwards [hμν.ae_le h, Measure.rnDeriv_pos hμν, hμν.ae_le (Measure.rnDeriv_lt_top μ ν)]
with x hx_eq hx_pos hx_ne_top
rw [hx_eq]
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, ENNReal.toReal_mul]
rw [log_mul]
rotate_left
· rw [ENNReal.toReal_ne_zero]
simp [hc, hc_ne_top]
· rw [ENNReal.toReal_ne_zero]
simp [hx_pos.ne', hx_ne_top.ne]
ring
lemma llr_smul_right [IsFiniteMeasure μ] [Measure.HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ ν]
(hμν : μ ≪ ν) (c : ℝ≥0∞) (hc : c ≠ 0) (hc_ne_top : c ≠ ∞) :
llr μ (c • ν) =ᵐ[μ] fun x ↦ llr μ ν x - log c.toReal := by
simp only [llr, llr_def]
have h := Measure.rnDeriv_smul_right_of_ne_top μ ν hc hc_ne_top
filter_upwards [hμν.ae_le h, Measure.rnDeriv_pos hμν, hμν.ae_le (Measure.rnDeriv_lt_top μ ν)]
with x hx_eq hx_pos hx_ne_top
rw [hx_eq]
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, ENNReal.toReal_mul]
rw [log_mul]
rotate_left
· rw [ENNReal.toReal_ne_zero]
simp [hc, hc_ne_top]
· rw [ENNReal.toReal_ne_zero]
simp [hx_pos.ne', hx_ne_top.ne]
rw [ENNReal.toReal_inv, log_inv]
ring
lemma integrable_rnDeriv_mul_log_iff [SigmaFinite μ] [μ.HaveLebesgueDecomposition ν] (hμν : μ ≪ ν) :
Integrable (fun a ↦ (μ.rnDeriv ν a).toReal * log (μ.rnDeriv ν a).toReal) ν
↔ Integrable (llr μ ν) μ :=
integrable_rnDeriv_smul_iff hμν
lemma integral_rnDeriv_mul_log [SigmaFinite μ] [μ.HaveLebesgueDecomposition ν] (hμν : μ ≪ ν) :
∫ a, (μ.rnDeriv ν a).toReal * log (μ.rnDeriv ν a).toReal ∂ν = ∫ a, llr μ ν a ∂μ := by
simp_rw [← smul_eq_mul, integral_rnDeriv_smul hμν, llr]
section llr_tilted
lemma llr_tilted_left [SigmaFinite μ] [SigmaFinite ν] (hμν : μ ≪ ν)
(hf : Integrable (fun x ↦ exp (f x)) μ) (hfν : AEMeasurable f ν) :
(llr (μ.tilted f) ν) =ᵐ[μ] fun x ↦ f x - log (∫ z, exp (f z) ∂μ) + llr μ ν x := by
cases eq_zero_or_neZero μ with
| inl hμ =>
simp only [hμ, ae_zero, Filter.EventuallyEq]; exact Filter.eventually_bot
| inr h0 =>
filter_upwards [hμν.ae_le (toReal_rnDeriv_tilted_left μ hfν), Measure.rnDeriv_pos hμν,
| hμν.ae_le (Measure.rnDeriv_lt_top μ ν)] with x hx hx_pos hx_lt_top
rw [llr, hx, log_mul, div_eq_mul_inv, log_mul (exp_pos _).ne', log_exp, log_inv, llr,
← sub_eq_add_neg]
· simp only [ne_eq, inv_eq_zero]
exact (integral_exp_pos hf).ne'
· simp only [ne_eq, div_eq_zero_iff]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/LogLikelihoodRatio.lean | 140 | 145 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.End
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Units
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.SubMulAction
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.OrderOfElement
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
/-!
# Integers mod `n`
Definition of the integers mod n, and the field structure on the integers mod p.
## Definitions
* `ZMod n`, which is for integers modulo a nat `n : ℕ`
* `val a` is defined as a natural number:
- for `a : ZMod 0` it is the absolute value of `a`
- for `a : ZMod n` with `0 < n` it is the least natural number in the equivalence class
* A coercion `cast` is defined from `ZMod n` into any ring.
This is a ring hom if the ring has characteristic dividing `n`
-/
assert_not_exists Field Submodule TwoSidedIdeal
open Function ZMod
namespace ZMod
/-- For non-zero `n : ℕ`, the ring `Fin n` is equivalent to `ZMod n`. -/
def finEquiv : ∀ (n : ℕ) [NeZero n], Fin n ≃+* ZMod n
| 0, h => (h.ne _ rfl).elim
| _ + 1, _ => .refl _
instance charZero : CharZero (ZMod 0) := inferInstanceAs (CharZero ℤ)
/-- `val a` is a natural number defined as:
- for `a : ZMod 0` it is the absolute value of `a`
- for `a : ZMod n` with `0 < n` it is the least natural number in the equivalence class
See `ZMod.valMinAbs` for a variant that takes values in the integers.
-/
def val : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ZMod n → ℕ
| 0 => Int.natAbs
| n + 1 => ((↑) : Fin (n + 1) → ℕ)
theorem val_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : a.val < n := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
exact Fin.is_lt a
theorem val_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : a.val ≤ n :=
a.val_lt.le
@[simp]
theorem val_zero : ∀ {n}, (0 : ZMod n).val = 0
| 0 => rfl
| _ + 1 => rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_one' : (1 : ZMod 0).val = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_neg' {n : ZMod 0} : (-n).val = n.val :=
Int.natAbs_neg n
@[simp]
theorem val_mul' {m n : ZMod 0} : (m * n).val = m.val * n.val :=
Int.natAbs_mul m n
@[simp]
theorem val_natCast (n a : ℕ) : (a : ZMod n).val = a % n := by
cases n
· rw [Nat.mod_zero]
exact Int.natAbs_natCast a
· apply Fin.val_natCast
lemma val_natCast_of_lt {n a : ℕ} (h : a < n) : (a : ZMod n).val = a := by
rwa [val_natCast, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
lemma val_ofNat (n a : ℕ) [a.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(a) : ZMod n).val = ofNat(a) % n := val_natCast ..
lemma val_ofNat_of_lt {n a : ℕ} [a.AtLeastTwo] (han : a < n) : (ofNat(a) : ZMod n).val = ofNat(a) :=
val_natCast_of_lt han
theorem val_unit' {n : ZMod 0} : IsUnit n ↔ n.val = 1 := by
simp only [val]
rw [Int.isUnit_iff, Int.natAbs_eq_iff, Nat.cast_one]
lemma eq_one_of_isUnit_natCast {n : ℕ} (h : IsUnit (n : ZMod 0)) : n = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.mod_zero n, ← val_natCast, val_unit'.mp h]
instance charP (n : ℕ) : CharP (ZMod n) n where
cast_eq_zero_iff := by
intro k
rcases n with - | n
· simp [zero_dvd_iff, Int.natCast_eq_zero]
· exact Fin.natCast_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_one (n : ℕ) : addOrderOf (1 : ZMod n) = n :=
CharP.eq _ (CharP.addOrderOf_one _) (ZMod.charP n)
/-- This lemma works in the case in which `ZMod n` is not infinite, i.e. `n ≠ 0`. The version
where `a ≠ 0` is `addOrderOf_coe'`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_coe (a : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (n0 : n ≠ 0) : addOrderOf (a : ZMod n) = n / n.gcd a := by
rcases a with - | a
· simp only [Nat.cast_zero, addOrderOf_zero, Nat.gcd_zero_right,
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero n0, Nat.div_self]
rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_nsmul' _ a.succ_ne_zero, ZMod.addOrderOf_one]
/-- This lemma works in the case in which `a ≠ 0`. The version where
`ZMod n` is not infinite, i.e. `n ≠ 0`, is `addOrderOf_coe`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_coe' {a : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (a0 : a ≠ 0) : addOrderOf (a : ZMod n) = n / n.gcd a := by
rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_nsmul' _ a0, ZMod.addOrderOf_one]
/-- We have that `ringChar (ZMod n) = n`. -/
theorem ringChar_zmod_n (n : ℕ) : ringChar (ZMod n) = n := by
rw [ringChar.eq_iff]
exact ZMod.charP n
theorem natCast_self (n : ℕ) : (n : ZMod n) = 0 :=
CharP.cast_eq_zero (ZMod n) n
@[simp]
theorem natCast_self' (n : ℕ) : (n + 1 : ZMod (n + 1)) = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_add_one, natCast_self (n + 1)]
section UniversalProperty
variable {n : ℕ} {R : Type*}
section
variable [AddGroupWithOne R]
/-- Cast an integer modulo `n` to another semiring.
This function is a morphism if the characteristic of `R` divides `n`.
See `ZMod.castHom` for a bundled version. -/
def cast : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ZMod n → R
| 0 => Int.cast
| _ + 1 => fun i => i.val
@[simp]
theorem cast_zero : (cast (0 : ZMod n) : R) = 0 := by
delta ZMod.cast
cases n
· exact Int.cast_zero
· simp
theorem cast_eq_val [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R) = a.val := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
rfl
variable {S : Type*} [AddGroupWithOne S]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.fst_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R × S).fst = cast a := by
cases n
· rfl
· simp [ZMod.cast]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.snd_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R × S).snd = cast a := by
cases n
· rfl
· simp [ZMod.cast]
end
/-- So-named because the coercion is `Nat.cast` into `ZMod`. For `Nat.cast` into an arbitrary ring,
see `ZMod.natCast_val`. -/
theorem natCast_zmod_val {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (a.val : ZMod n) = a := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
· apply Fin.cast_val_eq_self
theorem natCast_rightInverse [NeZero n] : Function.RightInverse val ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) :=
natCast_zmod_val
theorem natCast_zmod_surjective [NeZero n] : Function.Surjective ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) :=
natCast_rightInverse.surjective
/-- So-named because the outer coercion is `Int.cast` into `ZMod`. For `Int.cast` into an arbitrary
ring, see `ZMod.intCast_cast`. -/
@[norm_cast]
theorem intCast_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : ((cast a : ℤ) : ZMod n) = a := by
cases n
· simp [ZMod.cast, ZMod]
· dsimp [ZMod.cast]
rw [Int.cast_natCast, natCast_zmod_val]
theorem intCast_rightInverse : Function.RightInverse (cast : ZMod n → ℤ) ((↑) : ℤ → ZMod n) :=
intCast_zmod_cast
theorem intCast_surjective : Function.Surjective ((↑) : ℤ → ZMod n) :=
intCast_rightInverse.surjective
lemma «forall» {P : ZMod n → Prop} : (∀ x, P x) ↔ ∀ x : ℤ, P x := intCast_surjective.forall
lemma «exists» {P : ZMod n → Prop} : (∃ x, P x) ↔ ∃ x : ℤ, P x := intCast_surjective.exists
theorem cast_id : ∀ (n) (i : ZMod n), (ZMod.cast i : ZMod n) = i
| 0, _ => Int.cast_id
| _ + 1, i => natCast_zmod_val i
@[simp]
theorem cast_id' : (ZMod.cast : ZMod n → ZMod n) = id :=
funext (cast_id n)
variable (R) [Ring R]
/-- The coercions are respectively `Nat.cast` and `ZMod.cast`. -/
@[simp]
theorem natCast_comp_val [NeZero n] : ((↑) : ℕ → R) ∘ (val : ZMod n → ℕ) = cast := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
rfl
/-- The coercions are respectively `Int.cast`, `ZMod.cast`, and `ZMod.cast`. -/
@[simp]
theorem intCast_comp_cast : ((↑) : ℤ → R) ∘ (cast : ZMod n → ℤ) = cast := by
cases n
· exact congr_arg (Int.cast ∘ ·) ZMod.cast_id'
· ext
simp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem natCast_val [NeZero n] (i : ZMod n) : (i.val : R) = cast i :=
congr_fun (natCast_comp_val R) i
@[simp]
theorem intCast_cast (i : ZMod n) : ((cast i : ℤ) : R) = cast i :=
congr_fun (intCast_comp_cast R) i
theorem cast_add_eq_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) :
(cast (a + b) : ℤ) =
if (n : ℤ) ≤ cast a + cast b then (cast a + cast b - n : ℤ) else cast a + cast b := by
rcases n with - | n
· simp; rfl
change Fin (n + 1) at a b
change ((((a + b) : Fin (n + 1)) : ℕ) : ℤ) = if ((n + 1 : ℕ) : ℤ) ≤ (a : ℕ) + b then _ else _
simp only [Fin.val_add_eq_ite, Int.natCast_succ, Int.ofNat_le]
norm_cast
split_ifs with h
· rw [Nat.cast_sub h]
congr
· rfl
section CharDvd
/-! If the characteristic of `R` divides `n`, then `cast` is a homomorphism. -/
variable {m : ℕ} [CharP R m]
@[simp]
theorem cast_one (h : m ∣ n) : (cast (1 : ZMod n) : R) = 1 := by
rcases n with - | n
· exact Int.cast_one
show ((1 % (n + 1) : ℕ) : R) = 1
cases n
· rw [Nat.dvd_one] at h
subst m
subsingleton [CharP.CharOne.subsingleton]
rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
· exact Nat.cast_one
exact Nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ rfl
theorem cast_add (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a + b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a + cast b := by
cases n
· apply Int.cast_add
symm
dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [← Nat.cast_add, Fin.val_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← Nat.cast_sub (Nat.mod_le _ _),
@CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff R _ m]
exact h.trans (Nat.dvd_sub_mod _)
theorem cast_mul (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a * b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a * cast b := by
cases n
· apply Int.cast_mul
symm
dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [← Nat.cast_mul, Fin.val_mul, ← sub_eq_zero, ← Nat.cast_sub (Nat.mod_le _ _),
@CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff R _ m]
exact h.trans (Nat.dvd_sub_mod _)
/-- The canonical ring homomorphism from `ZMod n` to a ring of characteristic dividing `n`.
See also `ZMod.lift` for a generalized version working in `AddGroup`s.
-/
def castHom (h : m ∣ n) (R : Type*) [Ring R] [CharP R m] : ZMod n →+* R where
toFun := cast
map_zero' := cast_zero
map_one' := cast_one h
map_add' := cast_add h
map_mul' := cast_mul h
@[simp]
theorem castHom_apply {h : m ∣ n} (i : ZMod n) : castHom h R i = cast i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_sub (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a - b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a - cast b :=
(castHom h R).map_sub a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_neg (h : m ∣ n) (a : ZMod n) : (cast (-a : ZMod n) : R) = -(cast a) :=
(castHom h R).map_neg a
@[simp]
theorem cast_pow (h : m ∣ n) (a : ZMod n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (a ^ k : ZMod n) : R) = (cast a) ^ k :=
(castHom h R).map_pow a k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_natCast (h : m ∣ n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
map_natCast (castHom h R) k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_intCast (h : m ∣ n) (k : ℤ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
map_intCast (castHom h R) k
end CharDvd
section CharEq
/-! Some specialised simp lemmas which apply when `R` has characteristic `n`. -/
variable [CharP R n]
@[simp]
theorem cast_one' : (cast (1 : ZMod n) : R) = 1 :=
cast_one dvd_rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_add' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a + b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a + cast b :=
cast_add dvd_rfl a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_mul' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a * b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a * cast b :=
cast_mul dvd_rfl a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_sub' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a - b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a - cast b :=
cast_sub dvd_rfl a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_pow' (a : ZMod n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (a ^ k : ZMod n) : R) = (cast a : R) ^ k :=
cast_pow dvd_rfl a k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_natCast' (k : ℕ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
cast_natCast dvd_rfl k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_intCast' (k : ℤ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
cast_intCast dvd_rfl k
variable (R)
theorem castHom_injective : Function.Injective (ZMod.castHom (dvd_refl n) R) := by
rw [injective_iff_map_eq_zero]
intro x
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := ZMod.intCast_surjective x
rw [map_intCast, CharP.intCast_eq_zero_iff R n, CharP.intCast_eq_zero_iff (ZMod n) n]
exact id
theorem castHom_bijective [Fintype R] (h : Fintype.card R = n) :
Function.Bijective (ZMod.castHom (dvd_refl n) R) := by
haveI : NeZero n :=
⟨by
intro hn
rw [hn] at h
exact (Fintype.card_eq_zero_iff.mp h).elim' 0⟩
rw [Fintype.bijective_iff_injective_and_card, ZMod.card, h, eq_self_iff_true, and_true]
apply ZMod.castHom_injective
/-- The unique ring isomorphism between `ZMod n` and a ring `R`
of characteristic `n` and cardinality `n`. -/
noncomputable def ringEquiv [Fintype R] (h : Fintype.card R = n) : ZMod n ≃+* R :=
RingEquiv.ofBijective _ (ZMod.castHom_bijective R h)
/-- The unique ring isomorphism between `ZMod p` and a ring `R` of cardinality a prime `p`.
If you need any property of this isomorphism, first of all use `ringEquivOfPrime_eq_ringEquiv`
below (after `have : CharP R p := ...`) and deduce it by the results about `ZMod.ringEquiv`. -/
noncomputable def ringEquivOfPrime [Fintype R] {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (hR : Fintype.card R = p) :
ZMod p ≃+* R :=
have : Nontrivial R := Fintype.one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial.1 (hR ▸ hp.one_lt)
-- The following line exists as `charP_of_card_eq_prime` in `Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.CharAndCard`.
have : CharP R p := (CharP.charP_iff_prime_eq_zero hp).2 (hR ▸ Nat.cast_card_eq_zero R)
ZMod.ringEquiv R hR
@[simp]
lemma ringEquivOfPrime_eq_ringEquiv [Fintype R] {p : ℕ} [CharP R p] (hp : p.Prime)
(hR : Fintype.card R = p) : ringEquivOfPrime R hp hR = ringEquiv R hR := rfl
/-- The identity between `ZMod m` and `ZMod n` when `m = n`, as a ring isomorphism. -/
def ringEquivCongr {m n : ℕ} (h : m = n) : ZMod m ≃+* ZMod n := by
rcases m with - | m <;> rcases n with - | n
· exact RingEquiv.refl _
· exfalso
exact n.succ_ne_zero h.symm
· exfalso
exact m.succ_ne_zero h
· exact
{ finCongr h with
map_mul' := fun a b => by
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
rw [Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_mul, Fin.coe_mul, Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_cast, ← h]
map_add' := fun a b => by
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
rw [Fin.coe_cast, Fin.val_add, Fin.val_add, Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_cast, ← h] }
@[simp] lemma ringEquivCongr_refl (a : ℕ) : ringEquivCongr (rfl : a = a) = .refl _ := by
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_refl_apply {a : ℕ} (x : ZMod a) : ringEquivCongr rfl x = x := by
rw [ringEquivCongr_refl]
rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_symm {a b : ℕ} (hab : a = b) :
(ringEquivCongr hab).symm = ringEquivCongr hab.symm := by
subst hab
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_trans {a b c : ℕ} (hab : a = b) (hbc : b = c) :
(ringEquivCongr hab).trans (ringEquivCongr hbc) = ringEquivCongr (hab.trans hbc) := by
subst hab hbc
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_ringEquivCongr_apply {a b c : ℕ} (hab : a = b) (hbc : b = c) (x : ZMod a) :
ringEquivCongr hbc (ringEquivCongr hab x) = ringEquivCongr (hab.trans hbc) x := by
rw [← ringEquivCongr_trans hab hbc]
rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_val {a b : ℕ} (h : a = b) (x : ZMod a) :
ZMod.val ((ZMod.ringEquivCongr h) x) = ZMod.val x := by
subst h
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_intCast {a b : ℕ} (h : a = b) (z : ℤ) :
ZMod.ringEquivCongr h z = z := by
subst h
cases a <;> rfl
end CharEq
end UniversalProperty
variable {m n : ℕ}
@[simp]
theorem val_eq_zero : ∀ {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n), a.val = 0 ↔ a = 0
| 0, _ => Int.natAbs_eq_zero
| n + 1, a => by
rw [Fin.ext_iff]
exact Iff.rfl
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a ≡ b [ZMOD c] :=
CharP.intCast_eq_intCast (ZMod c) c
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff' (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a % c = b % c :=
ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff a b c
theorem val_intCast {n : ℕ} (a : ℤ) [NeZero n] : ↑(a : ZMod n).val = a % n := by
have hle : (0 : ℤ) ≤ ↑(a : ZMod n).val := Int.natCast_nonneg _
have hlt : ↑(a : ZMod n).val < (n : ℤ) := Int.ofNat_lt.mpr (ZMod.val_lt a)
refine (Int.emod_eq_of_lt hle hlt).symm.trans ?_
rw [← ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff', Int.cast_natCast, ZMod.natCast_val, ZMod.cast_id]
theorem natCast_eq_natCast_iff (a b c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a ≡ b [MOD c] := by
simpa [Int.natCast_modEq_iff] using ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff a b c
theorem natCast_eq_natCast_iff' (a b c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a % c = b % c :=
ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff a b c
theorem intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : (a : ZMod b) = 0 ↔ (b : ℤ) ∣ a := by
rw [← Int.cast_zero, ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff, Int.modEq_zero_iff_dvd]
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff_dvd_sub (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = ↑b ↔ ↑c ∣ b - a := by
rw [ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff, Int.modEq_iff_dvd]
theorem natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd (a b : ℕ) : (a : ZMod b) = 0 ↔ b ∣ a := by
rw [← Nat.cast_zero, ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff, Nat.modEq_zero_iff_dvd]
theorem coe_intCast (a : ℤ) : cast (a : ZMod n) = a % n := by
cases n
· rw [Int.ofNat_zero, Int.emod_zero, Int.cast_id]; rfl
· rw [← val_intCast, val]; rfl
lemma intCast_cast_add (x y : ZMod n) : (cast (x + y) : ℤ) = (cast x + cast y) % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_add, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
lemma intCast_cast_mul (x y : ZMod n) : (cast (x * y) : ℤ) = cast x * cast y % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_mul, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
lemma intCast_cast_sub (x y : ZMod n) : (cast (x - y) : ℤ) = (cast x - cast y) % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_sub, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
lemma intCast_cast_neg (x : ZMod n) : (cast (-x) : ℤ) = -cast x % n := by
rw [← ZMod.coe_intCast, Int.cast_neg, ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast]
@[simp]
theorem val_neg_one (n : ℕ) : (-1 : ZMod n.succ).val = n := by
dsimp [val, Fin.coe_neg]
cases n
· simp [Nat.mod_one]
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
rw [Fin.coe_neg_one]
/-- `-1 : ZMod n` lifts to `n - 1 : R`. This avoids the characteristic assumption in `cast_neg`. -/
theorem cast_neg_one {R : Type*} [Ring R] (n : ℕ) : cast (-1 : ZMod n) = (n - 1 : R) := by
rcases n with - | n
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]; simp
· rw [← natCast_val, val_neg_one, Nat.cast_succ, add_sub_cancel_right]
theorem cast_sub_one {R : Type*} [Ring R] {n : ℕ} (k : ZMod n) :
(cast (k - 1 : ZMod n) : R) = (if k = 0 then (n : R) else cast k) - 1 := by
split_ifs with hk
· rw [hk, zero_sub, ZMod.cast_neg_one]
· cases n
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
rw [Int.cast_sub, Int.cast_one]
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [Fin.coe_sub_one, if_neg]
· rw [Nat.cast_sub, Nat.cast_one]
rwa [Fin.ext_iff, Fin.val_zero, ← Ne, ← Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero] at hk
· exact hk
theorem natCast_eq_iff (p : ℕ) (n : ℕ) (z : ZMod p) [NeZero p] :
↑n = z ↔ ∃ k, n = z.val + p * k := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
refine ⟨n / p, ?_⟩
rw [val_natCast, Nat.mod_add_div]
· rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [Nat.cast_add, natCast_zmod_val, Nat.cast_mul, natCast_self, zero_mul,
add_zero]
theorem intCast_eq_iff (p : ℕ) (n : ℤ) (z : ZMod p) [NeZero p] :
↑n = z ↔ ∃ k, n = z.val + p * k := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
refine ⟨n / p, ?_⟩
rw [val_intCast, Int.emod_add_ediv]
· rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [Int.cast_add, Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_natCast, Int.cast_natCast, natCast_val,
ZMod.natCast_self, zero_mul, add_zero, cast_id]
@[push_cast, simp]
theorem intCast_mod (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : ((a % b : ℤ) : ZMod b) = (a : ZMod b) := by
rw [ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff]
apply Int.mod_modEq
theorem ker_intCastAddHom (n : ℕ) :
(Int.castAddHom (ZMod n)).ker = AddSubgroup.zmultiples (n : ℤ) := by
ext
rw [Int.mem_zmultiples_iff, AddMonoidHom.mem_ker, Int.coe_castAddHom,
intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd]
theorem cast_injective_of_le {m n : ℕ} [nzm : NeZero m] (h : m ≤ n) :
Function.Injective (@cast (ZMod n) _ m) := by
cases m with
| zero => cases nzm; simp_all
| succ m =>
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ f
simp only [cast, val, natCast_eq_natCast_iff',
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (hx.trans_le h), Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (hy.trans_le h)] at f
apply Fin.ext
exact f
theorem cast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_of_le {m n : ℕ} [NeZero m] (h : m ≤ n) (a : ZMod m) :
(cast a : ZMod n) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← ZMod.cast_zero (n := m)]
exact Injective.eq_iff' (cast_injective_of_le h) rfl
@[simp]
theorem natCast_toNat (p : ℕ) : ∀ {z : ℤ} (_h : 0 ≤ z), (z.toNat : ZMod p) = z
| (n : ℕ), _h => by simp only [Int.cast_natCast, Int.toNat_natCast]
| Int.negSucc n, h => by simp at h
theorem val_injective (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : Function.Injective (val : ZMod n → ℕ) := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
intro a b h
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
exact h
theorem val_one_eq_one_mod (n : ℕ) : (1 : ZMod n).val = 1 % n := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, val_natCast]
theorem val_two_eq_two_mod (n : ℕ) : (2 : ZMod n).val = 2 % n := by
rw [← Nat.cast_two, val_natCast]
theorem val_one (n : ℕ) [Fact (1 < n)] : (1 : ZMod n).val = 1 := by
rw [val_one_eq_one_mod]
exact Nat.mod_eq_of_lt Fact.out
lemma val_one'' : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 1 → (1 : ZMod n).val = 1
| 0, _ => rfl
| 1, hn => by cases hn rfl
| n + 2, _ =>
haveI : Fact (1 < n + 2) := ⟨by simp⟩
ZMod.val_one _
theorem val_add {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a b : ZMod n) : (a + b).val = (a.val + b.val) % n := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
· apply Fin.val_add
theorem val_add_of_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : ZMod n} (h : a.val + b.val < n) :
(a + b).val = a.val + b.val := by
have : NeZero n := by constructor; rintro rfl; simp at h
rw [ZMod.val_add, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h]
theorem val_add_val_of_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a b : ZMod n} (h : n ≤ a.val + b.val) :
a.val + b.val = (a + b).val + n := by
rw [val_add, Nat.add_mod_add_of_le_add_mod, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _),
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _)]
rwa [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _), Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _)]
theorem val_add_of_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a b : ZMod n} (h : n ≤ a.val + b.val) :
(a + b).val = a.val + b.val - n := by
rw [val_add_val_of_le h]
exact eq_tsub_of_add_eq rfl
theorem val_add_le {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) : (a + b).val ≤ a.val + b.val := by
cases n
· simpa [ZMod.val] using Int.natAbs_add_le _ _
· simpa [ZMod.val_add] using Nat.mod_le _ _
theorem val_mul {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) : (a * b).val = a.val * b.val % n := by
cases n
· rw [Nat.mod_zero]
apply Int.natAbs_mul
· apply Fin.val_mul
theorem val_mul_le {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) : (a * b).val ≤ a.val * b.val := by
rw [val_mul]
apply Nat.mod_le
theorem val_mul_of_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : ZMod n} (h : a.val * b.val < n) :
(a * b).val = a.val * b.val := by
rw [val_mul]
apply Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h
theorem val_mul_iff_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a b : ZMod n) :
(a * b).val = a.val * b.val ↔ a.val * b.val < n := by
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [← h]; apply ZMod.val_lt
· apply ZMod.val_mul_of_lt h
instance nontrivial (n : ℕ) [Fact (1 < n)] : Nontrivial (ZMod n) :=
⟨⟨0, 1, fun h =>
zero_ne_one <|
calc
0 = (0 : ZMod n).val := by rw [val_zero]
_ = (1 : ZMod n).val := congr_arg ZMod.val h
_ = 1 := val_one n
⟩⟩
instance nontrivial' : Nontrivial (ZMod 0) := by
delta ZMod; infer_instance
lemma one_eq_zero_iff {n : ℕ} : (1 : ZMod n) = 0 ↔ n = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd, Nat.dvd_one]
/-- The inversion on `ZMod n`.
It is setup in such a way that `a * a⁻¹` is equal to `gcd a.val n`.
In particular, if `a` is coprime to `n`, and hence a unit, `a * a⁻¹ = 1`. -/
def inv : ∀ n : ℕ, ZMod n → ZMod n
| 0, i => Int.sign i
| n + 1, i => Nat.gcdA i.val (n + 1)
instance (n : ℕ) : Inv (ZMod n) :=
⟨inv n⟩
theorem inv_zero : ∀ n : ℕ, (0 : ZMod n)⁻¹ = 0
| 0 => Int.sign_zero
| n + 1 =>
show (Nat.gcdA _ (n + 1) : ZMod (n + 1)) = 0 by
rw [val_zero]
unfold Nat.gcdA Nat.xgcd Nat.xgcdAux
rfl
theorem mul_inv_eq_gcd {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n) : a * a⁻¹ = Nat.gcd a.val n := by
rcases n with - | n
· dsimp [ZMod] at a ⊢
calc
_ = a * Int.sign a := rfl
_ = a.natAbs := by rw [Int.mul_sign_self]
_ = a.natAbs.gcd 0 := by rw [Nat.gcd_zero_right]
· calc
a * a⁻¹ = a * a⁻¹ + n.succ * Nat.gcdB (val a) n.succ := by
rw [natCast_self, zero_mul, add_zero]
_ = ↑(↑a.val * Nat.gcdA (val a) n.succ + n.succ * Nat.gcdB (val a) n.succ) := by
push_cast
rw [natCast_zmod_val]
rfl
_ = Nat.gcd a.val n.succ := by rw [← Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab a.val n.succ]; rfl
@[simp] protected lemma inv_one (n : ℕ) : (1⁻¹ : ZMod n) = 1 := by
obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne n 1
· exact Subsingleton.elim _ _
· simpa [ZMod.val_one'' hn] using mul_inv_eq_gcd (1 : ZMod n)
@[simp]
theorem natCast_mod (a : ℕ) (n : ℕ) : ((a % n : ℕ) : ZMod n) = a := by
conv =>
rhs
rw [← Nat.mod_add_div a n]
simp
theorem eq_iff_modEq_nat (n : ℕ) {a b : ℕ} : (a : ZMod n) = b ↔ a ≡ b [MOD n] := by
cases n
· simp [Nat.ModEq, Int.natCast_inj, Nat.mod_zero]
· rw [Fin.ext_iff, Nat.ModEq, ← val_natCast, ← val_natCast]
exact Iff.rfl
theorem eq_zero_iff_even {n : ℕ} : (n : ZMod 2) = 0 ↔ Even n :=
(CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff (ZMod 2) 2 n).trans even_iff_two_dvd.symm
theorem eq_one_iff_odd {n : ℕ} : (n : ZMod 2) = 1 ↔ Odd n := by
rw [← @Nat.cast_one (ZMod 2), ZMod.eq_iff_modEq_nat, Nat.odd_iff, Nat.ModEq]
theorem ne_zero_iff_odd {n : ℕ} : (n : ZMod 2) ≠ 0 ↔ Odd n := by
constructor <;>
· contrapose
simp [eq_zero_iff_even]
theorem coe_mul_inv_eq_one {n : ℕ} (x : ℕ) (h : Nat.Coprime x n) :
((x : ZMod n) * (x : ZMod n)⁻¹) = 1 := by
rw [Nat.Coprime, Nat.gcd_comm, Nat.gcd_rec] at h
rw [mul_inv_eq_gcd, val_natCast, h, Nat.cast_one]
lemma mul_val_inv (hmn : m.Coprime n) : (m * (m⁻¹ : ZMod n).val : ZMod n) = 1 := by
obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne n 0
· simp [m.coprime_zero_right.1 hmn]
haveI : NeZero n := ⟨hn⟩
rw [ZMod.natCast_zmod_val, ZMod.coe_mul_inv_eq_one _ hmn]
lemma val_inv_mul (hmn : m.Coprime n) : ((m⁻¹ : ZMod n).val * m : ZMod n) = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_val_inv hmn]
/-- `unitOfCoprime` makes an element of `(ZMod n)ˣ` given
a natural number `x` and a proof that `x` is coprime to `n` -/
def unitOfCoprime {n : ℕ} (x : ℕ) (h : Nat.Coprime x n) : (ZMod n)ˣ :=
⟨x, x⁻¹, coe_mul_inv_eq_one x h, by rw [mul_comm, coe_mul_inv_eq_one x h]⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_unitOfCoprime {n : ℕ} (x : ℕ) (h : Nat.Coprime x n) :
(unitOfCoprime x h : ZMod n) = x :=
rfl
theorem val_coe_unit_coprime {n : ℕ} (u : (ZMod n)ˣ) : Nat.Coprime (u : ZMod n).val n := by
rcases n with - | n
· rcases Int.units_eq_one_or u with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp
apply Nat.coprime_of_mul_modEq_one ((u⁻¹ : Units (ZMod (n + 1))) : ZMod (n + 1)).val
have := Units.ext_iff.1 (mul_inv_cancel u)
rw [Units.val_one] at this
rw [← eq_iff_modEq_nat, Nat.cast_one, ← this]; clear this
rw [← natCast_zmod_val ((u * u⁻¹ : Units (ZMod (n + 1))) : ZMod (n + 1))]
rw [Units.val_mul, val_mul, natCast_mod]
lemma isUnit_iff_coprime (m n : ℕ) : IsUnit (m : ZMod n) ↔ m.Coprime n := by
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, fun H ↦ (unitOfCoprime m H).isUnit⟩
have H' := val_coe_unit_coprime H.unit
rw [IsUnit.unit_spec, val_natCast, Nat.coprime_iff_gcd_eq_one] at H'
rw [Nat.coprime_iff_gcd_eq_one, Nat.gcd_comm, ← H']
exact Nat.gcd_rec n m
lemma isUnit_prime_iff_not_dvd {n p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : IsUnit (p : ZMod n) ↔ ¬p ∣ n := by
rw [isUnit_iff_coprime, Nat.Prime.coprime_iff_not_dvd hp]
lemma isUnit_prime_of_not_dvd {n p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (h : ¬ p ∣ n) : IsUnit (p : ZMod n) :=
(isUnit_prime_iff_not_dvd hp).mpr h
@[simp]
theorem inv_coe_unit {n : ℕ} (u : (ZMod n)ˣ) : (u : ZMod n)⁻¹ = (u⁻¹ : (ZMod n)ˣ) := by
have := congr_arg ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) (val_coe_unit_coprime u)
rw [← mul_inv_eq_gcd, Nat.cast_one] at this
let u' : (ZMod n)ˣ := ⟨u, (u : ZMod n)⁻¹, this, by rwa [mul_comm]⟩
have h : u = u' := by
apply Units.ext
rfl
rw [h]
rfl
theorem mul_inv_of_unit {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n) (h : IsUnit a) : a * a⁻¹ = 1 := by
rcases h with ⟨u, rfl⟩
rw [inv_coe_unit, u.mul_inv]
theorem inv_mul_of_unit {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n) (h : IsUnit a) : a⁻¹ * a = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_inv_of_unit a h]
-- TODO: If we changed `⁻¹` so that `ZMod n` is always a `DivisionMonoid`,
-- then we could use the general lemma `inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one`
protected theorem inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one (n : ℕ) (a b : ZMod n) (h : a * b = 1) : a⁻¹ = b :=
left_inv_eq_right_inv (inv_mul_of_unit a ⟨⟨a, b, h, mul_comm a b ▸ h⟩, rfl⟩) h
lemma inv_mul_eq_one_of_isUnit {n : ℕ} {a : ZMod n} (ha : IsUnit a) (b : ZMod n) :
a⁻¹ * b = 1 ↔ a = b := by
-- ideally, this would be `ha.inv_mul_eq_one`, but `ZMod n` is not a `DivisionMonoid`...
-- (see the "TODO" above)
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, fun H ↦ H ▸ a.inv_mul_of_unit ha⟩
apply_fun (a * ·) at H
rwa [← mul_assoc, a.mul_inv_of_unit ha, one_mul, mul_one, eq_comm] at H
-- TODO: this equivalence is true for `ZMod 0 = ℤ`, but needs to use different functions.
/-- Equivalence between the units of `ZMod n` and
the subtype of terms `x : ZMod n` for which `x.val` is coprime to `n` -/
def unitsEquivCoprime {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] : (ZMod n)ˣ ≃ { x : ZMod n // Nat.Coprime x.val n } where
toFun x := ⟨x, val_coe_unit_coprime x⟩
invFun x := unitOfCoprime x.1.val x.2
left_inv := fun ⟨_, _, _, _⟩ => Units.ext (natCast_zmod_val _)
right_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => by simp
/-- The **Chinese remainder theorem**. For a pair of coprime natural numbers, `m` and `n`,
the rings `ZMod (m * n)` and `ZMod m × ZMod n` are isomorphic.
See `Ideal.quotientInfRingEquivPiQuotient` for the Chinese remainder theorem for ideals in any
ring.
-/
def chineseRemainder {m n : ℕ} (h : m.Coprime n) : ZMod (m * n) ≃+* ZMod m × ZMod n :=
let to_fun : ZMod (m * n) → ZMod m × ZMod n :=
ZMod.castHom (show m.lcm n ∣ m * n by simp [Nat.lcm_dvd_iff]) (ZMod m × ZMod n)
let inv_fun : ZMod m × ZMod n → ZMod (m * n) := fun x =>
if m * n = 0 then
if m = 1 then cast (RingHom.snd _ (ZMod n) x) else cast (RingHom.fst (ZMod m) _ x)
else Nat.chineseRemainder h x.1.val x.2.val
have inv : Function.LeftInverse inv_fun to_fun ∧ Function.RightInverse inv_fun to_fun :=
if hmn0 : m * n = 0 then by
rcases h.eq_of_mul_eq_zero hmn0 with (⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)
· constructor
· intro x; rfl
· rintro ⟨x, y⟩
fin_cases y
simp [to_fun, inv_fun, castHom, Prod.ext_iff, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
· constructor
· intro x; rfl
· rintro ⟨x, y⟩
fin_cases x
simp [to_fun, inv_fun, castHom, Prod.ext_iff, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
else by
haveI : NeZero (m * n) := ⟨hmn0⟩
haveI : NeZero m := ⟨left_ne_zero_of_mul hmn0⟩
haveI : NeZero n := ⟨right_ne_zero_of_mul hmn0⟩
have left_inv : Function.LeftInverse inv_fun to_fun := by
intro x
dsimp only [to_fun, inv_fun, ZMod.castHom_apply]
conv_rhs => rw [← ZMod.natCast_zmod_val x]
rw [if_neg hmn0, ZMod.eq_iff_modEq_nat, ← Nat.modEq_and_modEq_iff_modEq_mul h,
Prod.fst_zmod_cast, Prod.snd_zmod_cast]
refine
⟨(Nat.chineseRemainder h (cast x : ZMod m).val (cast x : ZMod n).val).2.left.trans ?_,
(Nat.chineseRemainder h (cast x : ZMod m).val (cast x : ZMod n).val).2.right.trans ?_⟩
· rw [← ZMod.eq_iff_modEq_nat, ZMod.natCast_zmod_val, ZMod.natCast_val]
· rw [← ZMod.eq_iff_modEq_nat, ZMod.natCast_zmod_val, ZMod.natCast_val]
exact ⟨left_inv, left_inv.rightInverse_of_card_le (by simp)⟩
{ toFun := to_fun,
invFun := inv_fun,
map_mul' := RingHom.map_mul _
map_add' := RingHom.map_add _
left_inv := inv.1
right_inv := inv.2 }
|
lemma subsingleton_iff {n : ℕ} : Subsingleton (ZMod n) ↔ n = 1 := by
constructor
· obtain (_ | _ | n) := n
· simpa [ZMod] using not_subsingleton _
· simp [ZMod]
· simpa [ZMod] using not_subsingleton _
· rintro rfl
infer_instance
| Mathlib/Data/ZMod/Basic.lean | 886 | 894 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Order
/-!
# Measurability of `⌊x⌋` etc
In this file we prove that `Int.floor`, `Int.ceil`, `Int.fract`, `Nat.floor`, and `Nat.ceil` are
measurable under some assumptions on the (semi)ring.
-/
open Set
section FloorRing
variable {α R : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] [Ring R] [LinearOrder R] [FloorRing R]
[TopologicalSpace R] [OrderTopology R] [MeasurableSpace R]
theorem Int.measurable_floor [OpensMeasurableSpace R] : Measurable (Int.floor : R → ℤ) :=
measurable_to_countable fun x => by
| simpa only [Int.preimage_floor_singleton] using measurableSet_Ico
@[measurability, fun_prop]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/Floor.lean | 25 | 27 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Raghuram Sundararajan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Raghuram Sundararajan
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Ext
/-!
# Extensionality lemmas for rings and similar structures
In this file we prove extensionality lemmas for the ring-like structures defined in
`Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/Defs.lean`, ranging from `NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring` to `CommRing`. These
extensionality lemmas take the form of asserting that two algebraic structures on a type are equal
whenever the addition and multiplication defined by them are both the same.
## Implementation details
We follow `Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Ext.lean` in using the term `(letI := i; HMul.hMul : R → R → R)` to
refer to the multiplication specified by a typeclass instance `i` on a type `R` (and similarly for
addition). We abbreviate these using some local notations.
Since `Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Ext.lean` proved several injectivity lemmas, we do so as well — even if
sometimes we don't need them to prove extensionality.
## Tags
semiring, ring, extensionality
-/
local macro:max "local_hAdd[" type:term ", " inst:term "]" : term =>
`(term| (letI := $inst; HAdd.hAdd : $type → $type → $type))
local macro:max "local_hMul[" type:term ", " inst:term "]" : term =>
`(term| (letI := $inst; HMul.hMul : $type → $type → $type))
universe u
variable {R : Type u}
/-! ### Distrib -/
namespace Distrib
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : Distrib R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
-- Split into `add` and `mul` functions and properties.
rcases inst₁ with @⟨⟨⟩, ⟨⟩⟩
rcases inst₂ with @⟨⟨⟩, ⟨⟩⟩
-- Prove equality of parts using function extensionality.
congr
end Distrib
/-! ### NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring -/
namespace NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
-- Split into `AddMonoid` instance, `mul` function and properties.
rcases inst₁ with @⟨_, ⟨⟩⟩
rcases inst₂ with @⟨_, ⟨⟩⟩
-- Prove equality of parts using already-proved extensionality lemmas.
congr; ext : 1; assumption
theorem toDistrib_injective : Function.Injective (@toDistrib R) := by
intro _ _ h
ext x y
· exact congrArg (·.toAdd.add x y) h
· exact congrArg (·.toMul.mul x y) h
end NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
/-! ### NonUnitalSemiring -/
namespace NonUnitalSemiring
theorem toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R) := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ _; congr
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : NonUnitalSemiring R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ :=
toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring_injective <|
NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring.ext h_add h_mul
end NonUnitalSemiring
/-! ### NonAssocSemiring and its ancestors
This section also includes results for `AddMonoidWithOne`, `AddCommMonoidWithOne`, etc.
as these are considered implementation detail of the ring classes.
TODO consider relocating these lemmas.
-/
/- TODO consider relocating these lemmas. -/
@[ext] theorem AddMonoidWithOne.ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : AddMonoidWithOne R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_one : (letI := inst₁; One.one : R) = (letI := inst₂; One.one : R)) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
have h_monoid : inst₁.toAddMonoid = inst₂.toAddMonoid := by ext : 1; exact h_add
have h_zero' : inst₁.toZero = inst₂.toZero := congrArg (·.toZero) h_monoid
have h_one' : inst₁.toOne = inst₂.toOne :=
congrArg One.mk h_one
have h_natCast : inst₁.toNatCast.natCast = inst₂.toNatCast.natCast := by
funext n; induction n with
| zero => rewrite [inst₁.natCast_zero, inst₂.natCast_zero]
exact congrArg (@Zero.zero R) h_zero'
| succ n h => rw [inst₁.natCast_succ, inst₂.natCast_succ, h_add]
exact congrArg₂ _ h h_one
rcases inst₁ with @⟨⟨⟩⟩; rcases inst₂ with @⟨⟨⟩⟩
congr
theorem AddCommMonoidWithOne.toAddMonoidWithOne_injective :
Function.Injective (@AddCommMonoidWithOne.toAddMonoidWithOne R) := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ _; congr
@[ext] theorem AddCommMonoidWithOne.ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : AddCommMonoidWithOne R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_one : (letI := inst₁; One.one : R) = (letI := inst₂; One.one : R)) :
inst₁ = inst₂ :=
AddCommMonoidWithOne.toAddMonoidWithOne_injective <|
AddMonoidWithOne.ext h_add h_one
namespace NonAssocSemiring
/- The best place to prove that the `NatCast` is determined by the other operations is probably in
an extensionality lemma for `AddMonoidWithOne`, in which case we may as well do the typeclasses
defined in `Mathlib/Algebra/GroupWithZero/Defs.lean` as well. -/
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : NonAssocSemiring R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
have h : inst₁.toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring = inst₂.toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring := by
ext : 1 <;> assumption
have h_zero : (inst₁.toMulZeroClass).toZero.zero = (inst₂.toMulZeroClass).toZero.zero :=
congrArg (fun inst => (inst.toMulZeroClass).toZero.zero) h
have h_one' : (inst₁.toMulZeroOneClass).toMulOneClass.toOne
= (inst₂.toMulZeroOneClass).toMulOneClass.toOne :=
congrArg (@MulOneClass.toOne R) <| by ext : 1; exact h_mul
have h_one : (inst₁.toMulZeroOneClass).toMulOneClass.toOne.one
= (inst₂.toMulZeroOneClass).toMulOneClass.toOne.one :=
congrArg (@One.one R) h_one'
have : inst₁.toAddCommMonoidWithOne = inst₂.toAddCommMonoidWithOne := by
ext : 1 <;> assumption
have : inst₁.toNatCast = inst₂.toNatCast :=
congrArg (·.toNatCast) this
-- Split into `NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring`, `One` and `natCast` instances.
cases inst₁; cases inst₂
congr
theorem toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R) := by
intro _ _ _
ext <;> congr
end NonAssocSemiring
/-! ### NonUnitalNonAssocRing -/
namespace NonUnitalNonAssocRing
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : NonUnitalNonAssocRing R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
-- Split into `AddCommGroup` instance, `mul` function and properties.
rcases inst₁ with @⟨_, ⟨⟩⟩; rcases inst₂ with @⟨_, ⟨⟩⟩
congr; (ext : 1; assumption)
theorem toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R) := by
intro _ _ h
-- Use above extensionality lemma to prove injectivity by showing that `h_add` and `h_mul` hold.
ext x y
· exact congrArg (·.toAdd.add x y) h
· exact congrArg (·.toMul.mul x y) h
end NonUnitalNonAssocRing
/-! ### NonUnitalRing -/
namespace NonUnitalRing
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : NonUnitalRing R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
have : inst₁.toNonUnitalNonAssocRing = inst₂.toNonUnitalNonAssocRing := by
ext : 1 <;> assumption
-- Split into fields and prove they are equal using the above.
cases inst₁; cases inst₂
congr
theorem toNonUnitalSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalSemiring R) := by
intro _ _ h
ext x y
· exact congrArg (·.toAdd.add x y) h
· exact congrArg (·.toMul.mul x y) h
theorem toNonUnitalNonAssocring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalNonAssocRing R) := by
intro _ _ _
ext <;> congr
end NonUnitalRing
/-! ### NonAssocRing and its ancestors
This section also includes results for `AddGroupWithOne`, `AddCommGroupWithOne`, etc.
as these are considered implementation detail of the ring classes.
TODO consider relocating these lemmas. -/
@[ext] theorem AddGroupWithOne.ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : AddGroupWithOne R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_one : (letI := inst₁; One.one : R) = (letI := inst₂; One.one)) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
have : inst₁.toAddMonoidWithOne = inst₂.toAddMonoidWithOne :=
AddMonoidWithOne.ext h_add h_one
have : inst₁.toNatCast = inst₂.toNatCast := congrArg (·.toNatCast) this
have h_group : inst₁.toAddGroup = inst₂.toAddGroup := by ext : 1; exact h_add
-- Extract equality of necessary substructures from h_group
injection h_group with h_group; injection h_group
have : inst₁.toIntCast.intCast = inst₂.toIntCast.intCast := by
funext n; cases n with
| ofNat n => rewrite [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, inst₁.intCast_ofNat, inst₂.intCast_ofNat]; congr
| negSucc n => rewrite [inst₁.intCast_negSucc, inst₂.intCast_negSucc]; congr
rcases inst₁ with @⟨⟨⟩⟩; rcases inst₂ with @⟨⟨⟩⟩
congr
@[ext] theorem AddCommGroupWithOne.ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : AddCommGroupWithOne R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_one : (letI := inst₁; One.one : R) = (letI := inst₂; One.one)) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
have : inst₁.toAddCommGroup = inst₂.toAddCommGroup :=
AddCommGroup.ext h_add
have : inst₁.toAddGroupWithOne = inst₂.toAddGroupWithOne :=
AddGroupWithOne.ext h_add h_one
injection this with _ h_addMonoidWithOne; injection h_addMonoidWithOne
cases inst₁; cases inst₂
congr
namespace NonAssocRing
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : NonAssocRing R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
have h₁ : inst₁.toNonUnitalNonAssocRing = inst₂.toNonUnitalNonAssocRing := by
ext : 1 <;> assumption
have h₂ : inst₁.toNonAssocSemiring = inst₂.toNonAssocSemiring := by
ext : 1 <;> assumption
-- Mathematically non-trivial fact: `intCast` is determined by the rest.
have h₃ : inst₁.toAddCommGroupWithOne = inst₂.toAddCommGroupWithOne :=
AddCommGroupWithOne.ext h_add (congrArg (·.toOne.one) h₂)
cases inst₁; cases inst₂
congr <;> solve| injection h₁ | injection h₂ | injection h₃
theorem toNonAssocSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonAssocSemiring R) := by
intro _ _ h
ext x y
· exact congrArg (·.toAdd.add x y) h
· exact congrArg (·.toMul.mul x y) h
theorem toNonUnitalNonAssocring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalNonAssocRing R) := by
intro _ _ _
ext <;> congr
end NonAssocRing
/-! ### Semiring -/
namespace Semiring
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : Semiring R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
-- Show that enough substructures are equal.
have h₁ : inst₁.toNonUnitalSemiring = inst₂.toNonUnitalSemiring := by
ext : 1 <;> assumption
have h₂ : inst₁.toNonAssocSemiring = inst₂.toNonAssocSemiring := by
ext : 1 <;> assumption
have h₃ : (inst₁.toMonoidWithZero).toMonoid = (inst₂.toMonoidWithZero).toMonoid := by
ext : 1; exact h_mul
-- Split into fields and prove they are equal using the above.
cases inst₁; cases inst₂
congr <;> solve| injection h₁ | injection h₂ | injection h₃
theorem toNonUnitalSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalSemiring R) := by
intro _ _ h
ext x y
· exact congrArg (·.toAdd.add x y) h
· exact congrArg (·.toMul.mul x y) h
theorem toNonAssocSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonAssocSemiring R) := by
intro _ _ h
ext x y
· exact congrArg (·.toAdd.add x y) h
· exact congrArg (·.toMul.mul x y) h
end Semiring
/-! ### Ring -/
namespace Ring
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : Ring R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
-- Show that enough substructures are equal.
have h₁ : inst₁.toSemiring = inst₂.toSemiring := by
ext : 1 <;> assumption
have h₂ : inst₁.toNonAssocRing = inst₂.toNonAssocRing := by
ext : 1 <;> assumption
/- We prove that the `SubNegMonoid`s are equal because they are one
field away from `Sub` and `Neg`, enabling use of `injection`. -/
have h₃ : (inst₁.toAddCommGroup).toAddGroup.toSubNegMonoid
= (inst₂.toAddCommGroup).toAddGroup.toSubNegMonoid :=
congrArg (@AddGroup.toSubNegMonoid R) <| by ext : 1; exact h_add
-- Split into fields and prove they are equal using the above.
cases inst₁; cases inst₂
congr <;> solve | injection h₂ | injection h₃
theorem toNonUnitalRing_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalRing R) := by
intro _ _ h
ext x y
· exact congrArg (·.toAdd.add x y) h
· exact congrArg (·.toMul.mul x y) h
theorem toNonAssocRing_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonAssocRing R) := by
intro _ _ _
ext <;> congr
theorem toSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toSemiring R) := by
intro _ _ h
ext x y
· exact congrArg (·.toAdd.add x y) h
· exact congrArg (·.toMul.mul x y) h
end Ring
/-! ### NonUnitalNonAssocCommSemiring -/
namespace NonUnitalNonAssocCommSemiring
theorem toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R) := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ _; congr
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : NonUnitalNonAssocCommSemiring R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ :=
toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring_injective <|
NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring.ext h_add h_mul
end NonUnitalNonAssocCommSemiring
/-! ### NonUnitalCommSemiring -/
namespace NonUnitalCommSemiring
theorem toNonUnitalSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalSemiring R) := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ _; congr
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : NonUnitalCommSemiring R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ :=
toNonUnitalSemiring_injective <|
NonUnitalSemiring.ext h_add h_mul
end NonUnitalCommSemiring
-- At present, there is no `NonAssocCommSemiring` in Mathlib.
/-! ### NonUnitalNonAssocCommRing -/
namespace NonUnitalNonAssocCommRing
theorem toNonUnitalNonAssocRing_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalNonAssocRing R) := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ _; congr
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : NonUnitalNonAssocCommRing R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ :=
toNonUnitalNonAssocRing_injective <|
| NonUnitalNonAssocRing.ext h_add h_mul
end NonUnitalNonAssocCommRing
/-! ### NonUnitalCommRing -/
| Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/Ext.lean | 394 | 398 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Thomas Browning. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Cycle.Type
/-!
# Fixed-point-free automorphisms
This file defines fixed-point-free automorphisms and proves some basic properties.
An automorphism `φ` of a group `G` is fixed-point-free if `1 : G` is the only fixed point of `φ`.
-/
namespace MonoidHom
variable {F G : Type*}
section Definitions
variable (φ : G → G)
/-- A function `φ : G → G` is fixed-point-free if `1 : G` is the only fixed point of `φ`. -/
def FixedPointFree [One G] := ∀ g, φ g = g → g = 1
/-- The commutator map `g ↦ g / φ g`. If `φ g = h * g * h⁻¹`, then `g / φ g` is exactly the
commutator `[g, h] = g * h * g⁻¹ * h⁻¹`. -/
def commutatorMap [Div G] (g : G) := g / φ g
@[simp] theorem commutatorMap_apply [Div G] (g : G) : commutatorMap φ g = g / φ g := rfl
end Definitions
namespace FixedPointFree
variable [Group G] [FunLike F G G] [MonoidHomClass F G G] {φ : F}
theorem commutatorMap_injective (hφ : FixedPointFree φ) : Function.Injective (commutatorMap φ) := by
refine fun x y h ↦ inv_mul_eq_one.mp <| hφ _ ?_
rwa [map_mul, map_inv, eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq, ← mul_assoc, ← eq_div_iff_mul_eq', ← division_def]
variable [Finite G]
theorem commutatorMap_surjective (hφ : FixedPointFree φ) : Function.Surjective (commutatorMap φ) :=
Finite.surjective_of_injective hφ.commutatorMap_injective
theorem prod_pow_eq_one (hφ : FixedPointFree φ) {n : ℕ} (hn : φ^[n] = _root_.id) (g : G) :
((List.range n).map (fun k ↦ φ^[k] g)).prod = 1 := by
obtain ⟨g, rfl⟩ := commutatorMap_surjective hφ g
simp only [commutatorMap_apply, iterate_map_div, ← Function.iterate_succ_apply]
rw [List.prod_range_div', Function.iterate_zero_apply, hn, Function.id_def, div_self']
theorem coe_eq_inv_of_sq_eq_one (hφ : FixedPointFree φ) (h2 : φ^[2] = _root_.id) : ⇑φ = (·⁻¹) := by
ext g
have key : g * φ g = 1 := by simpa [List.range_succ] using hφ.prod_pow_eq_one h2 g
rwa [← inv_eq_iff_mul_eq_one, eq_comm] at key
section Involutive
theorem coe_eq_inv_of_involutive (hφ : FixedPointFree φ) (h2 : Function.Involutive φ) :
⇑φ = (·⁻¹) :=
coe_eq_inv_of_sq_eq_one hφ (funext h2)
theorem commute_all_of_involutive (hφ : FixedPointFree φ) (h2 : Function.Involutive φ) (g h : G) :
Commute g h := by
have key := map_mul φ g h
rwa [hφ.coe_eq_inv_of_involutive h2, inv_eq_iff_eq_inv, mul_inv_rev, inv_inv, inv_inv] at key
/-- If a finite group admits a fixed-point-free involution, then it is commutative. -/
def commGroupOfInvolutive (hφ : FixedPointFree φ) (h2 : Function.Involutive φ):
CommGroup G := .mk (hφ.commute_all_of_involutive h2)
theorem orderOf_ne_two_of_involutive (hφ : FixedPointFree φ) (h2 : Function.Involutive φ) (g : G) :
orderOf g ≠ 2 := by
intro hg
have key : φ g = g := by
rw [hφ.coe_eq_inv_of_involutive h2, inv_eq_iff_mul_eq_one, ← sq, ← hg, pow_orderOf_eq_one]
rw [hφ g key, orderOf_one] at hg
contradiction
theorem odd_card_of_involutive (hφ : FixedPointFree φ) (h2 : Function.Involutive φ) :
Odd (Nat.card G) := by
| have := Fintype.ofFinite G
by_contra h
rw [Nat.not_odd_iff_even, even_iff_two_dvd, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card] at h
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := exists_prime_orderOf_dvd_card 2 h
exact hφ.orderOf_ne_two_of_involutive h2 g hg
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/FixedPointFree.lean | 83 | 88 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn, Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Arithmetic
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.FixedPoint
/-!
# Cofinality
This file contains the definition of cofinality of an order and an ordinal number.
## Main Definitions
* `Order.cof r` is the cofinality of a reflexive order. This is the smallest cardinality of a subset
`s` that is *cofinal*, i.e. `∀ x, ∃ y ∈ s, r x y`.
* `Ordinal.cof o` is the cofinality of the ordinal `o` when viewed as a linear order.
## Main Statements
* `Cardinal.lt_power_cof`: A consequence of König's theorem stating that `c < c ^ c.ord.cof` for
`c ≥ ℵ₀`.
## Implementation Notes
* The cofinality is defined for ordinals.
If `c` is a cardinal number, its cofinality is `c.ord.cof`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Order
open scoped Ordinal
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
/-! ### Cofinality of orders -/
attribute [local instance] IsRefl.swap
namespace Order
/-- Cofinality of a reflexive order `≼`. This is the smallest cardinality
of a subset `S : Set α` such that `∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, a ≼ b`. -/
def cof (r : α → α → Prop) : Cardinal :=
sInf { c | ∃ S : Set α, (∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, r a b) ∧ #S = c }
/-- The set in the definition of `Order.cof` is nonempty. -/
private theorem cof_nonempty (r : α → α → Prop) [IsRefl α r] :
{ c | ∃ S : Set α, (∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, r a b) ∧ #S = c }.Nonempty :=
⟨_, Set.univ, fun a => ⟨a, ⟨⟩, refl _⟩, rfl⟩
theorem cof_le (r : α → α → Prop) {S : Set α} (h : ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, r a b) : cof r ≤ #S :=
csInf_le' ⟨S, h, rfl⟩
theorem le_cof [IsRefl α r] (c : Cardinal) :
c ≤ cof r ↔ ∀ {S : Set α}, (∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, r a b) → c ≤ #S := by
rw [cof, le_csInf_iff'' (cof_nonempty r)]
use fun H S h => H _ ⟨S, h, rfl⟩
rintro H d ⟨S, h, rfl⟩
exact H h
end Order
namespace RelIso
private theorem cof_le_lift [IsRefl β s] (f : r ≃r s) :
Cardinal.lift.{v} (Order.cof r) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{u} (Order.cof s) := by
rw [Order.cof, Order.cof, lift_sInf, lift_sInf, le_csInf_iff'' ((Order.cof_nonempty s).image _)]
rintro - ⟨-, ⟨u, H, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
apply csInf_le'
refine ⟨_, ⟨f.symm '' u, fun a => ?_, rfl⟩, lift_mk_eq'.2 ⟨(f.symm.toEquiv.image u).symm⟩⟩
rcases H (f a) with ⟨b, hb, hb'⟩
refine ⟨f.symm b, mem_image_of_mem _ hb, f.map_rel_iff.1 ?_⟩
rwa [RelIso.apply_symm_apply]
theorem cof_eq_lift [IsRefl β s] (f : r ≃r s) :
Cardinal.lift.{v} (Order.cof r) = Cardinal.lift.{u} (Order.cof s) :=
have := f.toRelEmbedding.isRefl
(f.cof_le_lift).antisymm (f.symm.cof_le_lift)
theorem cof_eq {α β : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} {s} [IsRefl β s] (f : r ≃r s) :
Order.cof r = Order.cof s :=
lift_inj.1 (f.cof_eq_lift)
end RelIso
/-! ### Cofinality of ordinals -/
namespace Ordinal
/-- Cofinality of an ordinal. This is the smallest cardinal of a subset `S` of the ordinal which is
unbounded, in the sense `∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, a ≤ b`.
In particular, `cof 0 = 0` and `cof (succ o) = 1`. -/
def cof (o : Ordinal.{u}) : Cardinal.{u} :=
o.liftOn (fun a ↦ Order.cof (swap a.rᶜ)) fun _ _ ⟨f⟩ ↦ f.compl.swap.cof_eq
theorem cof_type (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : (type r).cof = Order.cof (swap rᶜ) :=
rfl
theorem cof_type_lt [LinearOrder α] [IsWellOrder α (· < ·)] :
(@type α (· < ·) _).cof = @Order.cof α (· ≤ ·) := by
rw [cof_type, compl_lt, swap_ge]
theorem cof_eq_cof_toType (o : Ordinal) : o.cof = @Order.cof o.toType (· ≤ ·) := by
conv_lhs => rw [← type_toType o, cof_type_lt]
theorem le_cof_type [IsWellOrder α r] {c} : c ≤ cof (type r) ↔ ∀ S, Unbounded r S → c ≤ #S :=
(le_csInf_iff'' (Order.cof_nonempty _)).trans
⟨fun H S h => H _ ⟨S, h, rfl⟩, by
rintro H d ⟨S, h, rfl⟩
exact H _ h⟩
theorem cof_type_le [IsWellOrder α r] {S : Set α} (h : Unbounded r S) : cof (type r) ≤ #S :=
le_cof_type.1 le_rfl S h
theorem lt_cof_type [IsWellOrder α r] {S : Set α} : #S < cof (type r) → Bounded r S := by
simpa using not_imp_not.2 cof_type_le
theorem cof_eq (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : ∃ S, Unbounded r S ∧ #S = cof (type r) :=
csInf_mem (Order.cof_nonempty (swap rᶜ))
theorem ord_cof_eq (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] :
∃ S, Unbounded r S ∧ type (Subrel r (· ∈ S)) = (cof (type r)).ord := by
let ⟨S, hS, e⟩ := cof_eq r
let ⟨s, _, e'⟩ := Cardinal.ord_eq S
let T : Set α := { a | ∃ aS : a ∈ S, ∀ b : S, s b ⟨_, aS⟩ → r b a }
suffices Unbounded r T by
refine ⟨T, this, le_antisymm ?_ (Cardinal.ord_le.2 <| cof_type_le this)⟩
rw [← e, e']
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone
(fun a : T =>
(⟨a,
let ⟨aS, _⟩ := a.2
aS⟩ :
S))
fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
rcases a with ⟨a, aS, ha⟩
rcases b with ⟨b, bS, hb⟩
change s ⟨a, _⟩ ⟨b, _⟩
refine ((trichotomous_of s _ _).resolve_left fun hn => ?_).resolve_left ?_
· exact asymm h (ha _ hn)
· intro e
injection e with e
subst b
exact irrefl _ h
intro a
have : { b : S | ¬r b a }.Nonempty :=
let ⟨b, bS, ba⟩ := hS a
⟨⟨b, bS⟩, ba⟩
let b := (IsWellFounded.wf : WellFounded s).min _ this
have ba : ¬r b a := IsWellFounded.wf.min_mem _ this
refine ⟨b, ⟨b.2, fun c => not_imp_not.1 fun h => ?_⟩, ba⟩
rw [show ∀ b : S, (⟨b, b.2⟩ : S) = b by intro b; cases b; rfl]
exact IsWellFounded.wf.not_lt_min _ this (IsOrderConnected.neg_trans h ba)
/-! ### Cofinality of suprema and least strict upper bounds -/
private theorem card_mem_cof {o} : ∃ (ι : _) (f : ι → Ordinal), lsub.{u, u} f = o ∧ #ι = o.card :=
⟨_, _, lsub_typein o, mk_toType o⟩
/-- The set in the `lsub` characterization of `cof` is nonempty. -/
theorem cof_lsub_def_nonempty (o) :
{ a : Cardinal | ∃ (ι : _) (f : ι → Ordinal), lsub.{u, u} f = o ∧ #ι = a }.Nonempty :=
⟨_, card_mem_cof⟩
theorem cof_eq_sInf_lsub (o : Ordinal.{u}) : cof o =
sInf { a : Cardinal | ∃ (ι : Type u) (f : ι → Ordinal), lsub.{u, u} f = o ∧ #ι = a } := by
refine le_antisymm (le_csInf (cof_lsub_def_nonempty o) ?_) (csInf_le' ?_)
· rintro a ⟨ι, f, hf, rfl⟩
rw [← type_toType o]
refine
(cof_type_le fun a => ?_).trans
(@mk_le_of_injective _ _
(fun s : typein ((· < ·) : o.toType → o.toType → Prop) ⁻¹' Set.range f =>
Classical.choose s.prop)
fun s t hst => by
let H := congr_arg f hst
rwa [Classical.choose_spec s.prop, Classical.choose_spec t.prop, typein_inj,
Subtype.coe_inj] at H)
have := typein_lt_self a
simp_rw [← hf, lt_lsub_iff] at this
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := this
refine ⟨enum (α := o.toType) (· < ·) ⟨f i, ?_⟩, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [type_toType, ← hf]
apply lt_lsub
· rw [mem_preimage, typein_enum]
exact mem_range_self i
· rwa [← typein_le_typein, typein_enum]
· rcases cof_eq (α := o.toType) (· < ·) with ⟨S, hS, hS'⟩
let f : S → Ordinal := fun s => typein LT.lt s.val
refine ⟨S, f, le_antisymm (lsub_le fun i => typein_lt_self (o := o) i)
(le_of_forall_lt fun a ha => ?_), by rwa [type_toType o] at hS'⟩
rw [← type_toType o] at ha
rcases hS (enum (· < ·) ⟨a, ha⟩) with ⟨b, hb, hb'⟩
rw [← typein_le_typein, typein_enum] at hb'
exact hb'.trans_lt (lt_lsub.{u, u} f ⟨b, hb⟩)
@[simp]
theorem lift_cof (o) : Cardinal.lift.{u, v} (cof o) = cof (Ordinal.lift.{u, v} o) := by
refine inductionOn o fun α r _ ↦ ?_
rw [← type_uLift, cof_type, cof_type, ← Cardinal.lift_id'.{v, u} (Order.cof _),
← Cardinal.lift_umax]
apply RelIso.cof_eq_lift ⟨Equiv.ulift.symm, _⟩
simp [swap]
theorem cof_le_card (o) : cof o ≤ card o := by
rw [cof_eq_sInf_lsub]
exact csInf_le' card_mem_cof
theorem cof_ord_le (c : Cardinal) : c.ord.cof ≤ c := by simpa using cof_le_card c.ord
theorem ord_cof_le (o : Ordinal.{u}) : o.cof.ord ≤ o :=
(ord_le_ord.2 (cof_le_card o)).trans (ord_card_le o)
theorem exists_lsub_cof (o : Ordinal) :
∃ (ι : _) (f : ι → Ordinal), lsub.{u, u} f = o ∧ #ι = cof o := by
rw [cof_eq_sInf_lsub]
exact csInf_mem (cof_lsub_def_nonempty o)
theorem cof_lsub_le {ι} (f : ι → Ordinal) : cof (lsub.{u, u} f) ≤ #ι := by
rw [cof_eq_sInf_lsub]
exact csInf_le' ⟨ι, f, rfl, rfl⟩
theorem cof_lsub_le_lift {ι} (f : ι → Ordinal) :
cof (lsub.{u, v} f) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v, u} #ι := by
rw [← mk_uLift.{u, v}]
convert cof_lsub_le.{max u v} fun i : ULift.{v, u} ι => f i.down
exact
lsub_eq_of_range_eq.{u, max u v, max u v}
(Set.ext fun x => ⟨fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨ULift.up.{v, u} i, hi⟩, fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨_, hi⟩⟩)
theorem le_cof_iff_lsub {o : Ordinal} {a : Cardinal} :
a ≤ cof o ↔ ∀ {ι} (f : ι → Ordinal), lsub.{u, u} f = o → a ≤ #ι := by
rw [cof_eq_sInf_lsub]
exact
(le_csInf_iff'' (cof_lsub_def_nonempty o)).trans
⟨fun H ι f hf => H _ ⟨ι, f, hf, rfl⟩, fun H b ⟨ι, f, hf, hb⟩ => by
rw [← hb]
exact H _ hf⟩
theorem lsub_lt_ord_lift {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal} {c : Ordinal}
(hι : Cardinal.lift.{v, u} #ι < c.cof)
(hf : ∀ i, f i < c) : lsub.{u, v} f < c :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (lsub_le hf) fun h => by
subst h
exact (cof_lsub_le_lift.{u, v} f).not_lt hι
theorem lsub_lt_ord {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal} {c : Ordinal} (hι : #ι < c.cof) :
(∀ i, f i < c) → lsub.{u, u} f < c :=
lsub_lt_ord_lift (by rwa [(#ι).lift_id])
theorem cof_iSup_le_lift {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal} (H : ∀ i, f i < iSup f) :
cof (iSup f) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v, u} #ι := by
rw [← Ordinal.sup] at *
rw [← sup_eq_lsub_iff_lt_sup.{u, v}] at H
rw [H]
exact cof_lsub_le_lift f
theorem cof_iSup_le {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal} (H : ∀ i, f i < iSup f) :
cof (iSup f) ≤ #ι := by
rw [← (#ι).lift_id]
exact cof_iSup_le_lift H
theorem iSup_lt_ord_lift {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal} {c : Ordinal} (hι : Cardinal.lift.{v, u} #ι < c.cof)
(hf : ∀ i, f i < c) : iSup f < c :=
(sup_le_lsub.{u, v} f).trans_lt (lsub_lt_ord_lift hι hf)
theorem iSup_lt_ord {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal} {c : Ordinal} (hι : #ι < c.cof) :
(∀ i, f i < c) → iSup f < c :=
iSup_lt_ord_lift (by rwa [(#ι).lift_id])
theorem iSup_lt_lift {ι} {f : ι → Cardinal} {c : Cardinal}
(hι : Cardinal.lift.{v, u} #ι < c.ord.cof)
(hf : ∀ i, f i < c) : iSup f < c := by
rw [← ord_lt_ord, iSup_ord (Cardinal.bddAbove_range _)]
refine iSup_lt_ord_lift hι fun i => ?_
rw [ord_lt_ord]
apply hf
theorem iSup_lt {ι} {f : ι → Cardinal} {c : Cardinal} (hι : #ι < c.ord.cof) :
(∀ i, f i < c) → iSup f < c :=
iSup_lt_lift (by rwa [(#ι).lift_id])
theorem nfpFamily_lt_ord_lift {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal} {c} (hc : ℵ₀ < cof c)
(hc' : Cardinal.lift.{v, u} #ι < cof c) (hf : ∀ (i), ∀ b < c, f i b < c) {a} (ha : a < c) :
nfpFamily f a < c := by
refine iSup_lt_ord_lift ((Cardinal.lift_le.2 (mk_list_le_max ι)).trans_lt ?_) fun l => ?_
· rw [lift_max]
apply max_lt _ hc'
rwa [Cardinal.lift_aleph0]
· induction' l with i l H
· exact ha
· exact hf _ _ H
theorem nfpFamily_lt_ord {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal} {c} (hc : ℵ₀ < cof c) (hc' : #ι < cof c)
(hf : ∀ (i), ∀ b < c, f i b < c) {a} : a < c → nfpFamily.{u, u} f a < c :=
nfpFamily_lt_ord_lift hc (by rwa [(#ι).lift_id]) hf
theorem nfp_lt_ord {f : Ordinal → Ordinal} {c} (hc : ℵ₀ < cof c) (hf : ∀ i < c, f i < c) {a} :
a < c → nfp f a < c :=
nfpFamily_lt_ord_lift hc (by simpa using Cardinal.one_lt_aleph0.trans hc) fun _ => hf
theorem exists_blsub_cof (o : Ordinal) :
∃ f : ∀ a < (cof o).ord, Ordinal, blsub.{u, u} _ f = o := by
rcases exists_lsub_cof o with ⟨ι, f, hf, hι⟩
rcases Cardinal.ord_eq ι with ⟨r, hr, hι'⟩
rw [← @blsub_eq_lsub' ι r hr] at hf
rw [← hι, hι']
exact ⟨_, hf⟩
theorem le_cof_iff_blsub {b : Ordinal} {a : Cardinal} :
a ≤ cof b ↔ ∀ {o} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal), blsub.{u, u} o f = b → a ≤ o.card :=
le_cof_iff_lsub.trans
⟨fun H o f hf => by simpa using H _ hf, fun H ι f hf => by
rcases Cardinal.ord_eq ι with ⟨r, hr, hι'⟩
rw [← @blsub_eq_lsub' ι r hr] at hf
simpa using H _ hf⟩
theorem cof_blsub_le_lift {o} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal) :
cof (blsub.{u, v} o f) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v, u} o.card := by
rw [← mk_toType o]
exact cof_lsub_le_lift _
theorem cof_blsub_le {o} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal) : cof (blsub.{u, u} o f) ≤ o.card := by
rw [← o.card.lift_id]
exact cof_blsub_le_lift f
theorem blsub_lt_ord_lift {o : Ordinal.{u}} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal} {c : Ordinal}
(ho : Cardinal.lift.{v, u} o.card < c.cof) (hf : ∀ i hi, f i hi < c) : blsub.{u, v} o f < c :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (blsub_le hf) fun h =>
ho.not_le (by simpa [← iSup_ord, hf, h] using cof_blsub_le_lift.{u, v} f)
theorem blsub_lt_ord {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal} {c : Ordinal} (ho : o.card < c.cof)
(hf : ∀ i hi, f i hi < c) : blsub.{u, u} o f < c :=
blsub_lt_ord_lift (by rwa [o.card.lift_id]) hf
theorem cof_bsup_le_lift {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal} (H : ∀ i h, f i h < bsup.{u, v} o f) :
cof (bsup.{u, v} o f) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v, u} o.card := by
rw [← bsup_eq_blsub_iff_lt_bsup.{u, v}] at H
rw [H]
exact cof_blsub_le_lift.{u, v} f
theorem cof_bsup_le {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal} :
(∀ i h, f i h < bsup.{u, u} o f) → cof (bsup.{u, u} o f) ≤ o.card := by
rw [← o.card.lift_id]
exact cof_bsup_le_lift
theorem bsup_lt_ord_lift {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal} {c : Ordinal}
(ho : Cardinal.lift.{v, u} o.card < c.cof) (hf : ∀ i hi, f i hi < c) : bsup.{u, v} o f < c :=
(bsup_le_blsub f).trans_lt (blsub_lt_ord_lift ho hf)
theorem bsup_lt_ord {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal} {c : Ordinal} (ho : o.card < c.cof) :
(∀ i hi, f i hi < c) → bsup.{u, u} o f < c :=
bsup_lt_ord_lift (by rwa [o.card.lift_id])
/-! ### Basic results -/
@[simp]
theorem cof_zero : cof 0 = 0 := by
refine LE.le.antisymm ?_ (Cardinal.zero_le _)
rw [← card_zero]
exact cof_le_card 0
@[simp]
theorem cof_eq_zero {o} : cof o = 0 ↔ o = 0 :=
⟨inductionOn o fun _ r _ z =>
let ⟨_, hl, e⟩ := cof_eq r
type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty.2 <|
⟨fun a =>
let ⟨_, h, _⟩ := hl a
(mk_eq_zero_iff.1 (e.trans z)).elim' ⟨_, h⟩⟩,
fun e => by simp [e]⟩
theorem cof_ne_zero {o} : cof o ≠ 0 ↔ o ≠ 0 :=
cof_eq_zero.not
@[simp]
theorem cof_succ (o) : cof (succ o) = 1 := by
apply le_antisymm
· refine inductionOn o fun α r _ => ?_
change cof (type _) ≤ _
rw [← (_ : #_ = 1)]
· apply cof_type_le
refine fun a => ⟨Sum.inr PUnit.unit, Set.mem_singleton _, ?_⟩
rcases a with (a | ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩) <;> simp [EmptyRelation]
· rw [Cardinal.mk_fintype, Set.card_singleton]
simp
· rw [← Cardinal.succ_zero, succ_le_iff]
simpa [lt_iff_le_and_ne, Cardinal.zero_le] using fun h =>
succ_ne_zero o (cof_eq_zero.1 (Eq.symm h))
@[simp]
theorem cof_eq_one_iff_is_succ {o} : cof.{u} o = 1 ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨inductionOn o fun α r _ z => by
rcases cof_eq r with ⟨S, hl, e⟩; rw [z] at e
obtain ⟨a⟩ := mk_ne_zero_iff.1 (by rw [e]; exact one_ne_zero)
refine
⟨typein r a,
Eq.symm <|
Quotient.sound
⟨RelIso.ofSurjective (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone ?_ fun x y => ?_) fun x => ?_⟩⟩
· apply Sum.rec <;> [exact Subtype.val; exact fun _ => a]
· rcases x with (x | ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩) <;> rcases y with (y | ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩) <;>
simp [Subrel, Order.Preimage, EmptyRelation]
exact x.2
· suffices r x a ∨ ∃ _ : PUnit.{u}, ↑a = x by
convert this
dsimp [RelEmbedding.ofMonotone]; simp
rcases trichotomous_of r x a with (h | h | h)
· exact Or.inl h
· exact Or.inr ⟨PUnit.unit, h.symm⟩
· rcases hl x with ⟨a', aS, hn⟩
refine absurd h ?_
convert hn
change (a : α) = ↑(⟨a', aS⟩ : S)
have := le_one_iff_subsingleton.1 (le_of_eq e)
congr!,
fun ⟨a, e⟩ => by simp [e]⟩
/-! ### Fundamental sequences -/
-- TODO: move stuff about fundamental sequences to their own file.
/-- A fundamental sequence for `a` is an increasing sequence of length `o = cof a` that converges at
`a`. We provide `o` explicitly in order to avoid type rewrites. -/
def IsFundamentalSequence (a o : Ordinal.{u}) (f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal.{u}) : Prop :=
o ≤ a.cof.ord ∧ (∀ {i j} (hi hj), i < j → f i hi < f j hj) ∧ blsub.{u, u} o f = a
namespace IsFundamentalSequence
variable {a o : Ordinal.{u}} {f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal.{u}}
protected theorem cof_eq (hf : IsFundamentalSequence a o f) : a.cof.ord = o :=
hf.1.antisymm' <| by
rw [← hf.2.2]
exact (ord_le_ord.2 (cof_blsub_le f)).trans (ord_card_le o)
protected theorem strict_mono (hf : IsFundamentalSequence a o f) {i j} :
∀ hi hj, i < j → f i hi < f j hj :=
hf.2.1
theorem blsub_eq (hf : IsFundamentalSequence a o f) : blsub.{u, u} o f = a :=
hf.2.2
theorem ord_cof (hf : IsFundamentalSequence a o f) :
IsFundamentalSequence a a.cof.ord fun i hi => f i (hi.trans_le (by rw [hf.cof_eq])) := by
have H := hf.cof_eq
subst H
exact hf
theorem id_of_le_cof (h : o ≤ o.cof.ord) : IsFundamentalSequence o o fun a _ => a :=
⟨h, @fun _ _ _ _ => id, blsub_id o⟩
protected theorem zero {f : ∀ b < (0 : Ordinal), Ordinal} : IsFundamentalSequence 0 0 f :=
⟨by rw [cof_zero, ord_zero], @fun i _ hi => (Ordinal.not_lt_zero i hi).elim, blsub_zero f⟩
protected theorem succ : IsFundamentalSequence (succ o) 1 fun _ _ => o := by
refine ⟨?_, @fun i j hi hj h => ?_, blsub_const Ordinal.one_ne_zero o⟩
· rw [cof_succ, ord_one]
· rw [lt_one_iff_zero] at hi hj
rw [hi, hj] at h
exact h.false.elim
protected theorem monotone (hf : IsFundamentalSequence a o f) {i j : Ordinal} (hi : i < o)
(hj : j < o) (hij : i ≤ j) : f i hi ≤ f j hj := by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hij with (hij | rfl)
· exact (hf.2.1 hi hj hij).le
· rfl
theorem trans {a o o' : Ordinal.{u}} {f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal.{u}} (hf : IsFundamentalSequence a o f)
{g : ∀ b < o', Ordinal.{u}} (hg : IsFundamentalSequence o o' g) :
IsFundamentalSequence a o' fun i hi =>
f (g i hi) (by rw [← hg.2.2]; apply lt_blsub) := by
refine ⟨?_, @fun i j _ _ h => hf.2.1 _ _ (hg.2.1 _ _ h), ?_⟩
· rw [hf.cof_eq]
exact hg.1.trans (ord_cof_le o)
· rw [@blsub_comp.{u, u, u} o _ f (@IsFundamentalSequence.monotone _ _ f hf)]
· exact hf.2.2
· exact hg.2.2
protected theorem lt {a o : Ordinal} {s : Π p < o, Ordinal}
(h : IsFundamentalSequence a o s) {p : Ordinal} (hp : p < o) : s p hp < a :=
h.blsub_eq ▸ lt_blsub s p hp
end IsFundamentalSequence
/-- Every ordinal has a fundamental sequence. -/
theorem exists_fundamental_sequence (a : Ordinal.{u}) :
∃ f, IsFundamentalSequence a a.cof.ord f := by
suffices h : ∃ o f, IsFundamentalSequence a o f by
rcases h with ⟨o, f, hf⟩
exact ⟨_, hf.ord_cof⟩
rcases exists_lsub_cof a with ⟨ι, f, hf, hι⟩
rcases ord_eq ι with ⟨r, wo, hr⟩
haveI := wo
let r' := Subrel r fun i ↦ ∀ j, r j i → f j < f i
let hrr' : r' ↪r r := Subrel.relEmbedding _ _
haveI := hrr'.isWellOrder
refine
⟨_, _, hrr'.ordinal_type_le.trans ?_, @fun i j _ h _ => (enum r' ⟨j, h⟩).prop _ ?_,
le_antisymm (blsub_le fun i hi => lsub_le_iff.1 hf.le _) ?_⟩
· rw [← hι, hr]
· change r (hrr'.1 _) (hrr'.1 _)
rwa [hrr'.2, @enum_lt_enum _ r']
· rw [← hf, lsub_le_iff]
intro i
suffices h : ∃ i' hi', f i ≤ bfamilyOfFamily' r' (fun i => f i) i' hi' by
rcases h with ⟨i', hi', hfg⟩
exact hfg.trans_lt (lt_blsub _ _ _)
by_cases h : ∀ j, r j i → f j < f i
· refine ⟨typein r' ⟨i, h⟩, typein_lt_type _ _, ?_⟩
rw [bfamilyOfFamily'_typein]
· push_neg at h
obtain ⟨hji, hij⟩ := wo.wf.min_mem _ h
refine ⟨typein r' ⟨_, fun k hkj => lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ hij⟩, typein_lt_type _ _, ?_⟩
· by_contra! H
exact (wo.wf.not_lt_min _ h ⟨IsTrans.trans _ _ _ hkj hji, H⟩) hkj
· rwa [bfamilyOfFamily'_typein]
@[simp]
theorem cof_cof (a : Ordinal.{u}) : cof (cof a).ord = cof a := by
obtain ⟨f, hf⟩ := exists_fundamental_sequence a
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := exists_fundamental_sequence a.cof.ord
exact ord_injective (hf.trans hg).cof_eq.symm
protected theorem IsNormal.isFundamentalSequence {f : Ordinal.{u} → Ordinal.{u}} (hf : IsNormal f)
{a o} (ha : IsLimit a) {g} (hg : IsFundamentalSequence a o g) :
IsFundamentalSequence (f a) o fun b hb => f (g b hb) := by
refine ⟨?_, @fun i j _ _ h => hf.strictMono (hg.2.1 _ _ h), ?_⟩
· rcases exists_lsub_cof (f a) with ⟨ι, f', hf', hι⟩
rw [← hg.cof_eq, ord_le_ord, ← hι]
suffices (lsub.{u, u} fun i => sInf { b : Ordinal | f' i ≤ f b }) = a by
rw [← this]
apply cof_lsub_le
have H : ∀ i, ∃ b < a, f' i ≤ f b := fun i => by
have := lt_lsub.{u, u} f' i
rw [hf', ← IsNormal.blsub_eq.{u, u} hf ha, lt_blsub_iff] at this
simpa using this
refine (lsub_le fun i => ?_).antisymm (le_of_forall_lt fun b hb => ?_)
· rcases H i with ⟨b, hb, hb'⟩
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (csInf_le' hb') hb
· have := hf.strictMono hb
rw [← hf', lt_lsub_iff] at this
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := this
rcases H i with ⟨b, _, hb⟩
exact
((le_csInf_iff'' ⟨b, by exact hb⟩).2 fun c hc =>
hf.strictMono.le_iff_le.1 (hi.trans hc)).trans_lt (lt_lsub _ i)
· rw [@blsub_comp.{u, u, u} a _ (fun b _ => f b) (@fun i j _ _ h => hf.strictMono.monotone h) g
hg.2.2]
exact IsNormal.blsub_eq.{u, u} hf ha
theorem IsNormal.cof_eq {f} (hf : IsNormal f) {a} (ha : IsLimit a) : cof (f a) = cof a :=
let ⟨_, hg⟩ := exists_fundamental_sequence a
ord_injective (hf.isFundamentalSequence ha hg).cof_eq
theorem IsNormal.cof_le {f} (hf : IsNormal f) (a) : cof a ≤ cof (f a) := by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit a with (rfl | ⟨b, rfl⟩ | ha)
· rw [cof_zero]
exact zero_le _
· rw [cof_succ, Cardinal.one_le_iff_ne_zero, cof_ne_zero, ← Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero]
exact (Ordinal.zero_le (f b)).trans_lt (hf.1 b)
· rw [hf.cof_eq ha]
@[simp]
theorem cof_add (a b : Ordinal) : b ≠ 0 → cof (a + b) = cof b := fun h => by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit b with (rfl | ⟨c, rfl⟩ | hb)
· contradiction
· rw [add_succ, cof_succ, cof_succ]
· exact (isNormal_add_right a).cof_eq hb
theorem aleph0_le_cof {o} : ℵ₀ ≤ cof o ↔ IsLimit o := by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit o with (rfl | ⟨o, rfl⟩ | l)
· simp [not_zero_isLimit, Cardinal.aleph0_ne_zero]
· simp [not_succ_isLimit, Cardinal.one_lt_aleph0]
· simp only [l, iff_true]
refine le_of_not_lt fun h => ?_
obtain ⟨n, e⟩ := Cardinal.lt_aleph0.1 h
have := cof_cof o
rw [e, ord_nat] at this
cases n
· simp at e
simp [e, not_zero_isLimit] at l
· rw [natCast_succ, cof_succ] at this
rw [← this, cof_eq_one_iff_is_succ] at e
rcases e with ⟨a, rfl⟩
exact not_succ_isLimit _ l
@[simp]
theorem cof_preOmega {o : Ordinal} (ho : IsSuccPrelimit o) : (preOmega o).cof = o.cof := by
by_cases h : IsMin o
· simp [h.eq_bot]
· exact isNormal_preOmega.cof_eq ⟨h, ho⟩
@[simp]
theorem cof_omega {o : Ordinal} (ho : o.IsLimit) : (ω_ o).cof = o.cof :=
isNormal_omega.cof_eq ho
@[simp]
theorem cof_omega0 : cof ω = ℵ₀ :=
(aleph0_le_cof.2 isLimit_omega0).antisymm' <| by
rw [← card_omega0]
apply cof_le_card
theorem cof_eq' (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (h : IsLimit (type r)) :
∃ S : Set α, (∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, r a b) ∧ #S = cof (type r) :=
let ⟨S, H, e⟩ := cof_eq r
⟨S, fun a =>
let a' := enum r ⟨_, h.succ_lt (typein_lt_type r a)⟩
let ⟨b, h, ab⟩ := H a'
⟨b, h,
(IsOrderConnected.conn a b a' <|
(typein_lt_typein r).1
(by
rw [typein_enum]
exact lt_succ (typein _ _))).resolve_right
ab⟩,
e⟩
@[simp]
theorem cof_univ : cof univ.{u, v} = Cardinal.univ.{u, v} :=
le_antisymm (cof_le_card _)
(by
refine le_of_forall_lt fun c h => ?_
rcases lt_univ'.1 h with ⟨c, rfl⟩
rcases @cof_eq Ordinal.{u} (· < ·) _ with ⟨S, H, Se⟩
rw [univ, ← lift_cof, ← Cardinal.lift_lift.{u+1, v, u}, Cardinal.lift_lt, ← Se]
refine lt_of_not_ge fun h => ?_
obtain ⟨a, e⟩ := Cardinal.mem_range_lift_of_le h
refine Quotient.inductionOn a (fun α e => ?_) e
obtain ⟨f⟩ := Quotient.exact e
have f := Equiv.ulift.symm.trans f
let g a := (f a).1
let o := succ (iSup g)
rcases H o with ⟨b, h, l⟩
refine l (lt_succ_iff.2 ?_)
rw [← show g (f.symm ⟨b, h⟩) = b by simp [g]]
apply Ordinal.le_iSup)
end Ordinal
namespace Cardinal
open Ordinal
/-! ### Results on sets -/
theorem mk_bounded_subset {α : Type*} (h : ∀ x < #α, 2 ^ x < #α) {r : α → α → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] (hr : (#α).ord = type r) : #{ s : Set α // Bounded r s } = #α := by
rcases eq_or_ne #α 0 with (ha | ha)
· rw [ha]
haveI := mk_eq_zero_iff.1 ha
rw [mk_eq_zero_iff]
constructor
rintro ⟨s, hs⟩
exact (not_unbounded_iff s).2 hs (unbounded_of_isEmpty s)
have h' : IsStrongLimit #α := ⟨ha, @h⟩
have ha := h'.aleph0_le
apply le_antisymm
· have : { s : Set α | Bounded r s } = ⋃ i, 𝒫{ j | r j i } := setOf_exists _
rw [← coe_setOf, this]
refine mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk.trans ((sum_le_iSup (fun i => #(𝒫{ j | r j i }))).trans
((mul_le_max_of_aleph0_le_left ha).trans ?_))
rw [max_eq_left]
apply ciSup_le' _
intro i
rw [mk_powerset]
apply (h'.two_power_lt _).le
rw [coe_setOf, card_typein, ← lt_ord, hr]
apply typein_lt_type
· refine @mk_le_of_injective α _ (fun x => Subtype.mk {x} ?_) ?_
· apply bounded_singleton
rw [← hr]
apply isLimit_ord ha
· intro a b hab
simpa [singleton_eq_singleton_iff] using hab
theorem mk_subset_mk_lt_cof {α : Type*} (h : ∀ x < #α, 2 ^ x < #α) :
#{ s : Set α // #s < cof (#α).ord } = #α := by
rcases eq_or_ne #α 0 with (ha | ha)
· simp [ha]
have h' : IsStrongLimit #α := ⟨ha, @h⟩
rcases ord_eq α with ⟨r, wo, hr⟩
haveI := wo
apply le_antisymm
· conv_rhs => rw [← mk_bounded_subset h hr]
apply mk_le_mk_of_subset
intro s hs
rw [hr] at hs
exact lt_cof_type hs
· refine @mk_le_of_injective α _ (fun x => Subtype.mk {x} ?_) ?_
· rw [mk_singleton]
exact one_lt_aleph0.trans_le (aleph0_le_cof.2 (isLimit_ord h'.aleph0_le))
· intro a b hab
simpa [singleton_eq_singleton_iff] using hab
/-- If the union of s is unbounded and s is smaller than the cofinality,
then s has an unbounded member -/
theorem unbounded_of_unbounded_sUnion (r : α → α → Prop) [wo : IsWellOrder α r] {s : Set (Set α)}
(h₁ : Unbounded r <| ⋃₀ s) (h₂ : #s < Order.cof (swap rᶜ)) : ∃ x ∈ s, Unbounded r x := by
by_contra! h
simp_rw [not_unbounded_iff] at h
let f : s → α := fun x : s => wo.wf.sup x (h x.1 x.2)
refine h₂.not_le (le_trans (csInf_le' ⟨range f, fun x => ?_, rfl⟩) mk_range_le)
rcases h₁ x with ⟨y, ⟨c, hc, hy⟩, hxy⟩
exact ⟨f ⟨c, hc⟩, mem_range_self _, fun hxz => hxy (Trans.trans (wo.wf.lt_sup _ hy) hxz)⟩
/-- If the union of s is unbounded and s is smaller than the cofinality,
then s has an unbounded member -/
theorem unbounded_of_unbounded_iUnion {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) [wo : IsWellOrder α r]
(s : β → Set α) (h₁ : Unbounded r <| ⋃ x, s x) (h₂ : #β < Order.cof (swap rᶜ)) :
∃ x : β, Unbounded r (s x) := by
rw [← sUnion_range] at h₁
rcases unbounded_of_unbounded_sUnion r h₁ (mk_range_le.trans_lt h₂) with ⟨_, ⟨x, rfl⟩, u⟩
exact ⟨x, u⟩
/-! ### Consequences of König's lemma -/
theorem lt_power_cof {c : Cardinal.{u}} : ℵ₀ ≤ c → c < c ^ c.ord.cof :=
Cardinal.inductionOn c fun α h => by
rcases ord_eq α with ⟨r, wo, re⟩
have := isLimit_ord h
rw [re] at this ⊢
rcases cof_eq' r this with ⟨S, H, Se⟩
have := sum_lt_prod (fun a : S => #{ x // r x a }) (fun _ => #α) fun i => ?_
· simp only [Cardinal.prod_const, Cardinal.lift_id, ← Se, ← mk_sigma, power_def] at this ⊢
refine lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ this
refine ⟨Embedding.ofSurjective ?_ ?_⟩
· exact fun x => x.2.1
· exact fun a =>
let ⟨b, h, ab⟩ := H a
⟨⟨⟨_, h⟩, _, ab⟩, rfl⟩
· have := typein_lt_type r i
rwa [← re, lt_ord] at this
theorem lt_cof_power {a b : Cardinal} (ha : ℵ₀ ≤ a) (b1 : 1 < b) : a < (b ^ a).ord.cof := by
have b0 : b ≠ 0 := (zero_lt_one.trans b1).ne'
apply lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (power_le_power_left <| power_ne_zero a b0)
rw [← power_mul, mul_eq_self ha]
exact lt_power_cof (ha.trans <| (cantor' _ b1).le)
end Cardinal
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Cofinality.lean | 781 | 788 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Moritz Doll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Moritz Doll, Anatole Dedecker
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.Bounded
import Mathlib.Analysis.Seminorm
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Sqrt
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Equicontinuity
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Equicontinuity
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.FilterBasis
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.LocallyConvex
/-!
# Topology induced by a family of seminorms
## Main definitions
* `SeminormFamily.basisSets`: The set of open seminorm balls for a family of seminorms.
* `SeminormFamily.moduleFilterBasis`: A module filter basis formed by the open balls.
* `Seminorm.IsBounded`: A linear map `f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F` is bounded iff every seminorm in `F` can be
bounded by a finite number of seminorms in `E`.
## Main statements
* `WithSeminorms.toLocallyConvexSpace`: A space equipped with a family of seminorms is locally
convex.
* `WithSeminorms.firstCountable`: A space is first countable if it's topology is induced by a
countable family of seminorms.
## Continuity of semilinear maps
If `E` and `F` are topological vector space with the topology induced by a family of seminorms, then
we have a direct method to prove that a linear map is continuous:
* `Seminorm.continuous_from_bounded`: A bounded linear map `f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F` is continuous.
If the topology of a space `E` is induced by a family of seminorms, then we can characterize von
Neumann boundedness in terms of that seminorm family. Together with
`LinearMap.continuous_of_locally_bounded` this gives general criterion for continuity.
* `WithSeminorms.isVonNBounded_iff_finset_seminorm_bounded`
* `WithSeminorms.isVonNBounded_iff_seminorm_bounded`
* `WithSeminorms.image_isVonNBounded_iff_finset_seminorm_bounded`
* `WithSeminorms.image_isVonNBounded_iff_seminorm_bounded`
## Tags
seminorm, locally convex
-/
open NormedField Set Seminorm TopologicalSpace Filter List
open NNReal Pointwise Topology Uniformity
variable {𝕜 𝕜₂ 𝕝 𝕝₂ E F G ι ι' : Type*}
section FilterBasis
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
variable (𝕜 E ι)
/-- An abbreviation for indexed families of seminorms. This is mainly to allow for dot-notation. -/
abbrev SeminormFamily :=
ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E
variable {𝕜 E ι}
namespace SeminormFamily
/-- The sets of a filter basis for the neighborhood filter of 0. -/
def basisSets (p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι) : Set (Set E) :=
⋃ (s : Finset ι) (r) (_ : 0 < r), singleton (ball (s.sup p) (0 : E) r)
variable (p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι)
theorem basisSets_iff {U : Set E} :
U ∈ p.basisSets ↔ ∃ (i : Finset ι) (r : ℝ), 0 < r ∧ U = ball (i.sup p) 0 r := by
simp only [basisSets, mem_iUnion, exists_prop, mem_singleton_iff]
theorem basisSets_mem (i : Finset ι) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : (i.sup p).ball 0 r ∈ p.basisSets :=
(basisSets_iff _).mpr ⟨i, _, hr, rfl⟩
theorem basisSets_singleton_mem (i : ι) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : (p i).ball 0 r ∈ p.basisSets :=
(basisSets_iff _).mpr ⟨{i}, _, hr, by rw [Finset.sup_singleton]⟩
theorem basisSets_nonempty [Nonempty ι] : p.basisSets.Nonempty := by
let i := Classical.arbitrary ι
refine nonempty_def.mpr ⟨(p i).ball 0 1, ?_⟩
exact p.basisSets_singleton_mem i zero_lt_one
theorem basisSets_intersect (U V : Set E) (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets) (hV : V ∈ p.basisSets) :
∃ z ∈ p.basisSets, z ⊆ U ∩ V := by
classical
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r₁, hr₁, hU⟩
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hV with ⟨t, r₂, hr₂, hV⟩
use ((s ∪ t).sup p).ball 0 (min r₁ r₂)
refine ⟨p.basisSets_mem (s ∪ t) (lt_min_iff.mpr ⟨hr₁, hr₂⟩), ?_⟩
rw [hU, hV, ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ (lt_min_iff.mpr ⟨hr₁, hr₂⟩),
ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ hr₁, ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ hr₂]
exact
Set.subset_inter
(Set.iInter₂_mono' fun i hi =>
⟨i, Finset.subset_union_left hi, ball_mono <| min_le_left _ _⟩)
(Set.iInter₂_mono' fun i hi =>
⟨i, Finset.subset_union_right hi, ball_mono <| min_le_right _ _⟩)
theorem basisSets_zero (U) (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets) : (0 : E) ∈ U := by
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨ι', r, hr, hU⟩
rw [hU, mem_ball_zero, map_zero]
exact hr
theorem basisSets_add (U) (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets) :
∃ V ∈ p.basisSets, V + V ⊆ U := by
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r, hr, hU⟩
use (s.sup p).ball 0 (r / 2)
refine ⟨p.basisSets_mem s (div_pos hr zero_lt_two), ?_⟩
refine Set.Subset.trans (ball_add_ball_subset (s.sup p) (r / 2) (r / 2) 0 0) ?_
rw [hU, add_zero, add_halves]
theorem basisSets_neg (U) (hU' : U ∈ p.basisSets) :
∃ V ∈ p.basisSets, V ⊆ (fun x : E => -x) ⁻¹' U := by
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU' with ⟨s, r, _, hU⟩
rw [hU, neg_preimage, neg_ball (s.sup p), neg_zero]
exact ⟨U, hU', Eq.subset hU⟩
/-- The `addGroupFilterBasis` induced by the filter basis `Seminorm.basisSets`. -/
protected def addGroupFilterBasis [Nonempty ι] : AddGroupFilterBasis E :=
addGroupFilterBasisOfComm p.basisSets p.basisSets_nonempty p.basisSets_intersect p.basisSets_zero
p.basisSets_add p.basisSets_neg
theorem basisSets_smul_right (v : E) (U : Set E) (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets) :
∀ᶠ x : 𝕜 in 𝓝 0, x • v ∈ U := by
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r, hr, hU⟩
rw [hU, Filter.eventually_iff]
simp_rw [(s.sup p).mem_ball_zero, map_smul_eq_mul]
by_cases h : 0 < (s.sup p) v
· simp_rw [(lt_div_iff₀ h).symm]
rw [← _root_.ball_zero_eq]
exact Metric.ball_mem_nhds 0 (div_pos hr h)
simp_rw [le_antisymm (not_lt.mp h) (apply_nonneg _ v), mul_zero, hr]
exact IsOpen.mem_nhds isOpen_univ (mem_univ 0)
variable [Nonempty ι]
theorem basisSets_smul (U) (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets) :
∃ V ∈ 𝓝 (0 : 𝕜), ∃ W ∈ p.addGroupFilterBasis.sets, V • W ⊆ U := by
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r, hr, hU⟩
refine ⟨Metric.ball 0 √r, Metric.ball_mem_nhds 0 (Real.sqrt_pos.mpr hr), ?_⟩
refine ⟨(s.sup p).ball 0 √r, p.basisSets_mem s (Real.sqrt_pos.mpr hr), ?_⟩
refine Set.Subset.trans (ball_smul_ball (s.sup p) √r √r) ?_
rw [hU, Real.mul_self_sqrt (le_of_lt hr)]
theorem basisSets_smul_left (x : 𝕜) (U : Set E) (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets) :
∃ V ∈ p.addGroupFilterBasis.sets, V ⊆ (fun y : E => x • y) ⁻¹' U := by
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r, hr, hU⟩
rw [hU]
by_cases h : x ≠ 0
· rw [(s.sup p).smul_ball_preimage 0 r x h, smul_zero]
use (s.sup p).ball 0 (r / ‖x‖)
exact ⟨p.basisSets_mem s (div_pos hr (norm_pos_iff.mpr h)), Subset.rfl⟩
refine ⟨(s.sup p).ball 0 r, p.basisSets_mem s hr, ?_⟩
simp only [not_ne_iff.mp h, Set.subset_def, mem_ball_zero, hr, mem_univ, map_zero, imp_true_iff,
preimage_const_of_mem, zero_smul]
/-- The `moduleFilterBasis` induced by the filter basis `Seminorm.basisSets`. -/
protected def moduleFilterBasis : ModuleFilterBasis 𝕜 E where
toAddGroupFilterBasis := p.addGroupFilterBasis
smul' := p.basisSets_smul _
smul_left' := p.basisSets_smul_left
smul_right' := p.basisSets_smul_right
theorem filter_eq_iInf (p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι) :
p.moduleFilterBasis.toFilterBasis.filter = ⨅ i, (𝓝 0).comap (p i) := by
refine le_antisymm (le_iInf fun i => ?_) ?_
· rw [p.moduleFilterBasis.toFilterBasis.hasBasis.le_basis_iff
(Metric.nhds_basis_ball.comap _)]
intro ε hε
refine ⟨(p i).ball 0 ε, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← (Finset.sup_singleton : _ = p i)]
exact p.basisSets_mem {i} hε
· rw [id, (p i).ball_zero_eq_preimage_ball]
· rw [p.moduleFilterBasis.toFilterBasis.hasBasis.ge_iff]
rintro U (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets)
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r, hr, rfl⟩
rw [id, Seminorm.ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ hr, s.iInter_mem_sets]
exact fun i _ =>
Filter.mem_iInf_of_mem i
⟨Metric.ball 0 r, Metric.ball_mem_nhds 0 hr,
Eq.subset (p i).ball_zero_eq_preimage_ball.symm⟩
/-- If a family of seminorms is continuous, then their basis sets are neighborhoods of zero. -/
lemma basisSets_mem_nhds {𝕜 E ι : Type*} [NormedField 𝕜]
[AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace E] (p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι)
(hp : ∀ i, Continuous (p i)) (U : Set E) (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets) : U ∈ 𝓝 (0 : E) := by
obtain ⟨s, r, hr, rfl⟩ := p.basisSets_iff.mp hU
clear hU
refine Seminorm.ball_mem_nhds ?_ hr
classical
induction s using Finset.induction_on
case empty => simpa using continuous_zero
case insert a s _ hs =>
simp only [Finset.sup_insert, coe_sup]
exact Continuous.max (hp a) hs
end SeminormFamily
end FilterBasis
section Bounded
namespace Seminorm
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedField 𝕜₂] [AddCommGroup F] [Module 𝕜₂ F]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
-- Todo: This should be phrased entirely in terms of the von Neumann bornology.
/-- The proposition that a linear map is bounded between spaces with families of seminorms. -/
def IsBounded (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (q : ι' → Seminorm 𝕜₂ F) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] F) : Prop :=
∀ i, ∃ s : Finset ι, ∃ C : ℝ≥0, (q i).comp f ≤ C • s.sup p
theorem isBounded_const (ι' : Type*) [Nonempty ι'] {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {q : Seminorm 𝕜₂ F}
(f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] F) :
IsBounded p (fun _ : ι' => q) f ↔ ∃ (s : Finset ι) (C : ℝ≥0), q.comp f ≤ C • s.sup p := by
simp only [IsBounded, forall_const]
theorem const_isBounded (ι : Type*) [Nonempty ι] {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {q : ι' → Seminorm 𝕜₂ F}
(f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] F) : IsBounded (fun _ : ι => p) q f ↔ ∀ i, ∃ C : ℝ≥0, (q i).comp f ≤ C • p := by
constructor <;> intro h i
· rcases h i with ⟨s, C, h⟩
exact ⟨C, le_trans h (smul_le_smul (Finset.sup_le fun _ _ => le_rfl) le_rfl)⟩
use {Classical.arbitrary ι}
simp only [h, Finset.sup_singleton]
theorem isBounded_sup {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {q : ι' → Seminorm 𝕜₂ F} {f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] F}
(hf : IsBounded p q f) (s' : Finset ι') :
∃ (C : ℝ≥0) (s : Finset ι), (s'.sup q).comp f ≤ C • s.sup p := by
classical
obtain rfl | _ := s'.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· exact ⟨1, ∅, by simp [Seminorm.bot_eq_zero]⟩
choose fₛ fC hf using hf
use s'.card • s'.sup fC, Finset.biUnion s' fₛ
have hs : ∀ i : ι', i ∈ s' → (q i).comp f ≤ s'.sup fC • (Finset.biUnion s' fₛ).sup p := by
intro i hi
refine (hf i).trans (smul_le_smul ?_ (Finset.le_sup hi))
exact Finset.sup_mono (Finset.subset_biUnion_of_mem fₛ hi)
refine (comp_mono f (finset_sup_le_sum q s')).trans ?_
simp_rw [← pullback_apply, map_sum, pullback_apply]
refine (Finset.sum_le_sum hs).trans ?_
rw [Finset.sum_const, smul_assoc]
end Seminorm
end Bounded
section Topology
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] [Nonempty ι]
/-- The proposition that the topology of `E` is induced by a family of seminorms `p`. -/
structure WithSeminorms (p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι) [topology : TopologicalSpace E] : Prop where
topology_eq_withSeminorms : topology = p.moduleFilterBasis.topology
theorem WithSeminorms.withSeminorms_eq {p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι} [t : TopologicalSpace E]
(hp : WithSeminorms p) : t = p.moduleFilterBasis.topology :=
hp.1
variable [TopologicalSpace E]
variable {p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι}
theorem WithSeminorms.topologicalAddGroup (hp : WithSeminorms p) : IsTopologicalAddGroup E := by
rw [hp.withSeminorms_eq]
exact AddGroupFilterBasis.isTopologicalAddGroup _
theorem WithSeminorms.continuousSMul (hp : WithSeminorms p) : ContinuousSMul 𝕜 E := by
rw [hp.withSeminorms_eq]
exact ModuleFilterBasis.continuousSMul _
theorem WithSeminorms.hasBasis (hp : WithSeminorms p) :
(𝓝 (0 : E)).HasBasis (fun s : Set E => s ∈ p.basisSets) id := by
rw [congr_fun (congr_arg (@nhds E) hp.1) 0]
exact AddGroupFilterBasis.nhds_zero_hasBasis _
theorem WithSeminorms.hasBasis_zero_ball (hp : WithSeminorms p) :
(𝓝 (0 : E)).HasBasis
(fun sr : Finset ι × ℝ => 0 < sr.2) fun sr => (sr.1.sup p).ball 0 sr.2 := by
refine ⟨fun V => ?_⟩
simp only [hp.hasBasis.mem_iff, SeminormFamily.basisSets_iff, Prod.exists]
constructor
· rintro ⟨-, ⟨s, r, hr, rfl⟩, hV⟩
exact ⟨s, r, hr, hV⟩
· rintro ⟨s, r, hr, hV⟩
exact ⟨_, ⟨s, r, hr, rfl⟩, hV⟩
theorem WithSeminorms.hasBasis_ball (hp : WithSeminorms p) {x : E} :
(𝓝 (x : E)).HasBasis
(fun sr : Finset ι × ℝ => 0 < sr.2) fun sr => (sr.1.sup p).ball x sr.2 := by
have : IsTopologicalAddGroup E := hp.topologicalAddGroup
rw [← map_add_left_nhds_zero]
convert hp.hasBasis_zero_ball.map (x + ·) using 1
ext sr : 1
-- Porting note: extra type ascriptions needed on `0`
have : (sr.fst.sup p).ball (x +ᵥ (0 : E)) sr.snd = x +ᵥ (sr.fst.sup p).ball 0 sr.snd :=
Eq.symm (Seminorm.vadd_ball (sr.fst.sup p))
rwa [vadd_eq_add, add_zero] at this
/-- The `x`-neighbourhoods of a space whose topology is induced by a family of seminorms
are exactly the sets which contain seminorm balls around `x`. -/
theorem WithSeminorms.mem_nhds_iff (hp : WithSeminorms p) (x : E) (U : Set E) :
U ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ s : Finset ι, ∃ r > 0, (s.sup p).ball x r ⊆ U := by
rw [hp.hasBasis_ball.mem_iff, Prod.exists]
/-- The open sets of a space whose topology is induced by a family of seminorms
are exactly the sets which contain seminorm balls around all of their points. -/
theorem WithSeminorms.isOpen_iff_mem_balls (hp : WithSeminorms p) (U : Set E) :
IsOpen U ↔ ∀ x ∈ U, ∃ s : Finset ι, ∃ r > 0, (s.sup p).ball x r ⊆ U := by
simp_rw [← WithSeminorms.mem_nhds_iff hp _ U, isOpen_iff_mem_nhds]
/- Note that through the following lemmas, one also immediately has that separating families
of seminorms induce T₂ and T₃ topologies by `IsTopologicalAddGroup.t2Space`
and `IsTopologicalAddGroup.t3Space` -/
/-- A separating family of seminorms induces a T₁ topology. -/
theorem WithSeminorms.T1_of_separating (hp : WithSeminorms p)
(h : ∀ x, x ≠ 0 → ∃ i, p i x ≠ 0) : T1Space E := by
have := hp.topologicalAddGroup
refine IsTopologicalAddGroup.t1Space _ ?_
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, hp.isOpen_iff_mem_balls]
rintro x (hx : x ≠ 0)
obtain ⟨i, pi_nonzero⟩ := h x hx
refine ⟨{i}, p i x, by positivity, subset_compl_singleton_iff.mpr ?_⟩
rw [Finset.sup_singleton, mem_ball, zero_sub, map_neg_eq_map, not_lt]
/-- A family of seminorms inducing a T₁ topology is separating. -/
theorem WithSeminorms.separating_of_T1 [T1Space E] (hp : WithSeminorms p) (x : E) (hx : x ≠ 0) :
∃ i, p i x ≠ 0 := by
have := ((t1Space_TFAE E).out 0 9).mp (inferInstanceAs <| T1Space E)
by_contra! h
refine hx (this ?_)
rw [hp.hasBasis_zero_ball.specializes_iff]
rintro ⟨s, r⟩ (hr : 0 < r)
simp only [ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ hr, mem_iInter₂, mem_ball_zero, h, hr, forall_true_iff]
/-- A family of seminorms is separating iff it induces a T₁ topology. -/
theorem WithSeminorms.separating_iff_T1 (hp : WithSeminorms p) :
(∀ x, x ≠ 0 → ∃ i, p i x ≠ 0) ↔ T1Space E := by
refine ⟨WithSeminorms.T1_of_separating hp, ?_⟩
intro
exact WithSeminorms.separating_of_T1 hp
end Topology
section Tendsto
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] [Nonempty ι] [TopologicalSpace E]
variable {p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι}
/-- Convergence along filters for `WithSeminorms`.
Variant with `Finset.sup`. -/
theorem WithSeminorms.tendsto_nhds' (hp : WithSeminorms p) (u : F → E) {f : Filter F} (y₀ : E) :
Filter.Tendsto u f (𝓝 y₀) ↔
∀ (s : Finset ι) (ε), 0 < ε → ∀ᶠ x in f, s.sup p (u x - y₀) < ε := by
simp [hp.hasBasis_ball.tendsto_right_iff]
/-- Convergence along filters for `WithSeminorms`. -/
theorem WithSeminorms.tendsto_nhds (hp : WithSeminorms p) (u : F → E) {f : Filter F} (y₀ : E) :
Filter.Tendsto u f (𝓝 y₀) ↔ ∀ i ε, 0 < ε → ∀ᶠ x in f, p i (u x - y₀) < ε := by
rw [hp.tendsto_nhds' u y₀]
exact
⟨fun h i => by simpa only [Finset.sup_singleton] using h {i}, fun h s ε hε =>
(s.eventually_all.2 fun i _ => h i ε hε).mono fun _ => finset_sup_apply_lt hε⟩
variable [SemilatticeSup F] [Nonempty F]
/-- Limit `→ ∞` for `WithSeminorms`. -/
theorem WithSeminorms.tendsto_nhds_atTop (hp : WithSeminorms p) (u : F → E) (y₀ : E) :
Filter.Tendsto u Filter.atTop (𝓝 y₀) ↔
∀ i ε, 0 < ε → ∃ x₀, ∀ x, x₀ ≤ x → p i (u x - y₀) < ε := by
rw [hp.tendsto_nhds u y₀]
exact forall₃_congr fun _ _ _ => Filter.eventually_atTop
end Tendsto
section IsTopologicalAddGroup
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
variable [Nonempty ι]
section TopologicalSpace
variable [t : TopologicalSpace E]
theorem SeminormFamily.withSeminorms_of_nhds [IsTopologicalAddGroup E] (p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι)
(h : 𝓝 (0 : E) = p.moduleFilterBasis.toFilterBasis.filter) : WithSeminorms p := by
refine
⟨IsTopologicalAddGroup.ext inferInstance p.addGroupFilterBasis.isTopologicalAddGroup ?_⟩
rw [AddGroupFilterBasis.nhds_zero_eq]
exact h
theorem SeminormFamily.withSeminorms_of_hasBasis [IsTopologicalAddGroup E]
(p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι) (h : (𝓝 (0 : E)).HasBasis (fun s : Set E => s ∈ p.basisSets) id) :
WithSeminorms p :=
p.withSeminorms_of_nhds <|
Filter.HasBasis.eq_of_same_basis h p.addGroupFilterBasis.toFilterBasis.hasBasis
theorem SeminormFamily.withSeminorms_iff_nhds_eq_iInf [IsTopologicalAddGroup E]
(p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι) : WithSeminorms p ↔ (𝓝 (0 : E)) = ⨅ i, (𝓝 0).comap (p i) := by
rw [← p.filter_eq_iInf]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, p.withSeminorms_of_nhds⟩
rw [h.topology_eq_withSeminorms]
exact AddGroupFilterBasis.nhds_zero_eq _
/-- The topology induced by a family of seminorms is exactly the infimum of the ones induced by
each seminorm individually. We express this as a characterization of `WithSeminorms p`. -/
theorem SeminormFamily.withSeminorms_iff_topologicalSpace_eq_iInf [IsTopologicalAddGroup E]
(p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι) :
WithSeminorms p ↔
t = ⨅ i, (p i).toSeminormedAddCommGroup.toUniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace := by
rw [p.withSeminorms_iff_nhds_eq_iInf,
IsTopologicalAddGroup.ext_iff inferInstance (topologicalAddGroup_iInf fun i => inferInstance),
nhds_iInf]
congrm _ = ⨅ i, ?_
exact @comap_norm_nhds_zero _ (p i).toSeminormedAddGroup
theorem WithSeminorms.continuous_seminorm {p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι} (hp : WithSeminorms p)
(i : ι) : Continuous (p i) := by
have := hp.topologicalAddGroup
rw [p.withSeminorms_iff_topologicalSpace_eq_iInf.mp hp]
exact continuous_iInf_dom (@continuous_norm _ (p i).toSeminormedAddGroup)
end TopologicalSpace
/-- The uniform structure induced by a family of seminorms is exactly the infimum of the ones
induced by each seminorm individually. We express this as a characterization of
`WithSeminorms p`. -/
theorem SeminormFamily.withSeminorms_iff_uniformSpace_eq_iInf [u : UniformSpace E]
[IsUniformAddGroup E] (p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι) :
WithSeminorms p ↔ u = ⨅ i, (p i).toSeminormedAddCommGroup.toUniformSpace := by
rw [p.withSeminorms_iff_nhds_eq_iInf,
IsUniformAddGroup.ext_iff inferInstance (isUniformAddGroup_iInf fun i => inferInstance),
UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace_iInf, nhds_iInf]
congrm _ = ⨅ i, ?_
exact @comap_norm_nhds_zero _ (p i).toAddGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedAddGroup
end IsTopologicalAddGroup
section NormedSpace
/-- The topology of a `NormedSpace 𝕜 E` is induced by the seminorm `normSeminorm 𝕜 E`. -/
theorem norm_withSeminorms (𝕜 E) [NormedField 𝕜] [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] :
WithSeminorms fun _ : Fin 1 => normSeminorm 𝕜 E := by
let p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E (Fin 1) := fun _ => normSeminorm 𝕜 E
refine
⟨SeminormedAddCommGroup.toIsTopologicalAddGroup.ext
p.addGroupFilterBasis.isTopologicalAddGroup ?_⟩
refine Filter.HasBasis.eq_of_same_basis Metric.nhds_basis_ball ?_
rw [← ball_normSeminorm 𝕜 E]
refine
Filter.HasBasis.to_hasBasis p.addGroupFilterBasis.nhds_zero_hasBasis ?_ fun r hr =>
⟨(normSeminorm 𝕜 E).ball 0 r, p.basisSets_singleton_mem 0 hr, rfl.subset⟩
rintro U (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets)
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r, hr, hU⟩
use r, hr
rw [hU, id]
by_cases h : s.Nonempty
· rw [Finset.sup_const h]
rw [Finset.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.mp h, Finset.sup_empty, ball_bot _ hr]
exact Set.subset_univ _
end NormedSpace
section NontriviallyNormedField
variable [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] [Nonempty ι]
variable {p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι}
variable [TopologicalSpace E]
theorem WithSeminorms.isVonNBounded_iff_finset_seminorm_bounded {s : Set E} (hp : WithSeminorms p) :
Bornology.IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s ↔ ∀ I : Finset ι, ∃ r > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, I.sup p x < r := by
rw [hp.hasBasis.isVonNBounded_iff]
constructor
· intro h I
simp only [id] at h
specialize h ((I.sup p).ball 0 1) (p.basisSets_mem I zero_lt_one)
rcases h.exists_pos with ⟨r, hr, h⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := NormedField.exists_lt_norm 𝕜 r
specialize h a (le_of_lt ha)
rw [Seminorm.smul_ball_zero (norm_pos_iff.1 <| hr.trans ha), mul_one] at h
refine ⟨‖a‖, lt_trans hr ha, ?_⟩
intro x hx
specialize h hx
exact (Finset.sup I p).mem_ball_zero.mp h
intro h s' hs'
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hs' with ⟨I, r, hr, hs'⟩
rw [id, hs']
rcases h I with ⟨r', _, h'⟩
simp_rw [← (I.sup p).mem_ball_zero] at h'
refine Absorbs.mono_right ?_ h'
exact (Finset.sup I p).ball_zero_absorbs_ball_zero hr
theorem WithSeminorms.image_isVonNBounded_iff_finset_seminorm_bounded (f : G → E) {s : Set G}
(hp : WithSeminorms p) :
Bornology.IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (f '' s) ↔
∀ I : Finset ι, ∃ r > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, I.sup p (f x) < r := by
simp_rw [hp.isVonNBounded_iff_finset_seminorm_bounded, Set.forall_mem_image]
theorem WithSeminorms.isVonNBounded_iff_seminorm_bounded {s : Set E} (hp : WithSeminorms p) :
Bornology.IsVonNBounded 𝕜 s ↔ ∀ i : ι, ∃ r > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, p i x < r := by
rw [hp.isVonNBounded_iff_finset_seminorm_bounded]
constructor
· intro hI i
convert hI {i}
rw [Finset.sup_singleton]
intro hi I
by_cases hI : I.Nonempty
· choose r hr h using hi
have h' : 0 < I.sup' hI r := by
rcases hI with ⟨i, hi⟩
exact lt_of_lt_of_le (hr i) (Finset.le_sup' r hi)
refine ⟨I.sup' hI r, h', fun x hx => finset_sup_apply_lt h' fun i hi => ?_⟩
refine lt_of_lt_of_le (h i x hx) ?_
simp only [Finset.le_sup'_iff, exists_prop]
exact ⟨i, hi, (Eq.refl _).le⟩
simp only [Finset.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.mp hI, Finset.sup_empty, coe_bot, Pi.zero_apply,
exists_prop]
exact ⟨1, zero_lt_one, fun _ _ => zero_lt_one⟩
theorem WithSeminorms.image_isVonNBounded_iff_seminorm_bounded (f : G → E) {s : Set G}
(hp : WithSeminorms p) :
Bornology.IsVonNBounded 𝕜 (f '' s) ↔ ∀ i : ι, ∃ r > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, p i (f x) < r := by
simp_rw [hp.isVonNBounded_iff_seminorm_bounded, Set.forall_mem_image]
end NontriviallyNormedField
-- TODO: the names in this section are not very predictable
section continuous_of_bounded
namespace Seminorm
variable [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedField 𝕝] [Module 𝕝 E]
variable [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜₂] [AddCommGroup F] [Module 𝕜₂ F]
variable [NormedField 𝕝₂] [Module 𝕝₂ F]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
variable {τ₁₂ : 𝕝 →+* 𝕝₂} [RingHomIsometric τ₁₂]
variable [Nonempty ι] [Nonempty ι']
theorem continuous_of_continuous_comp {q : SeminormFamily 𝕝₂ F ι'} [TopologicalSpace E]
[IsTopologicalAddGroup E] [TopologicalSpace F] (hq : WithSeminorms q)
(f : E →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] F) (hf : ∀ i, Continuous ((q i).comp f)) : Continuous f := by
have : IsTopologicalAddGroup F := hq.topologicalAddGroup
refine continuous_of_continuousAt_zero f ?_
simp_rw [ContinuousAt, f.map_zero, q.withSeminorms_iff_nhds_eq_iInf.mp hq, Filter.tendsto_iInf,
Filter.tendsto_comap_iff]
intro i
convert (hf i).continuousAt.tendsto
exact (map_zero _).symm
theorem continuous_iff_continuous_comp {q : SeminormFamily 𝕜₂ F ι'} [TopologicalSpace E]
[IsTopologicalAddGroup E] [TopologicalSpace F] (hq : WithSeminorms q) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] F) :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ i, Continuous ((q i).comp f) :=
⟨fun h i => (hq.continuous_seminorm i).comp h, continuous_of_continuous_comp hq f⟩
theorem continuous_from_bounded {p : SeminormFamily 𝕝 E ι} {q : SeminormFamily 𝕝₂ F ι'}
{_ : TopologicalSpace E} (hp : WithSeminorms p) {_ : TopologicalSpace F} (hq : WithSeminorms q)
(f : E →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] F) (hf : Seminorm.IsBounded p q f) : Continuous f := by
have : IsTopologicalAddGroup E := hp.topologicalAddGroup
refine continuous_of_continuous_comp hq _ fun i => ?_
rcases hf i with ⟨s, C, hC⟩
rw [← Seminorm.finset_sup_smul] at hC
-- Note: we deduce continuouty of `s.sup (C • p)` from that of `∑ i ∈ s, C • p i`.
-- The reason is that there is no `continuous_finset_sup`, and even if it were we couldn't
-- really use it since `ℝ` is not an `OrderBot`.
refine Seminorm.continuous_of_le ?_ (hC.trans <| Seminorm.finset_sup_le_sum _ _)
change Continuous (fun x ↦ Seminorm.coeFnAddMonoidHom _ _ (∑ i ∈ s, C • p i) x)
simp_rw [map_sum, Finset.sum_apply]
exact (continuous_finset_sum _ fun i _ ↦ (hp.continuous_seminorm i).const_smul (C : ℝ))
theorem cont_withSeminorms_normedSpace (F) [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕝₂ F]
[TopologicalSpace E] {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕝 E} (hp : WithSeminorms p)
(f : E →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] F) (hf : ∃ (s : Finset ι) (C : ℝ≥0), (normSeminorm 𝕝₂ F).comp f ≤ C • s.sup p) :
Continuous f := by
rw [← Seminorm.isBounded_const (Fin 1)] at hf
exact continuous_from_bounded hp (norm_withSeminorms 𝕝₂ F) f hf
theorem cont_normedSpace_to_withSeminorms (E) [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕝 E]
[TopologicalSpace F] {q : ι → Seminorm 𝕝₂ F} (hq : WithSeminorms q)
(f : E →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] F) (hf : ∀ i : ι, ∃ C : ℝ≥0, (q i).comp f ≤ C • normSeminorm 𝕝 E) :
Continuous f := by
rw [← Seminorm.const_isBounded (Fin 1)] at hf
exact continuous_from_bounded (norm_withSeminorms 𝕝 E) hq f hf
/-- Let `E` and `F` be two topological vector spaces over a `NontriviallyNormedField`, and assume
that the topology of `F` is generated by some family of seminorms `q`. For a family `f` of linear
maps from `E` to `F`, the following are equivalent:
* `f` is equicontinuous at `0`.
* `f` is equicontinuous.
* `f` is uniformly equicontinuous.
* For each `q i`, the family of seminorms `k ↦ (q i) ∘ (f k)` is bounded by some continuous
seminorm `p` on `E`.
* For each `q i`, the seminorm `⊔ k, (q i) ∘ (f k)` is well-defined and continuous.
In particular, if you can determine all continuous seminorms on `E`, that gives you a complete
characterization of equicontinuity for linear maps from `E` to `F`. For example `E` and `F` are
both normed spaces, you get `NormedSpace.equicontinuous_TFAE`. -/
protected theorem _root_.WithSeminorms.equicontinuous_TFAE {κ : Type*}
{q : SeminormFamily 𝕜₂ F ι'} [UniformSpace E] [IsUniformAddGroup E] [u : UniformSpace F]
[hu : IsUniformAddGroup F] (hq : WithSeminorms q) [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 E]
| (f : κ → E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] F) : TFAE
[ EquicontinuousAt ((↑) ∘ f) 0,
Equicontinuous ((↑) ∘ f),
UniformEquicontinuous ((↑) ∘ f),
∀ i, ∃ p : Seminorm 𝕜 E, Continuous p ∧ ∀ k, (q i).comp (f k) ≤ p,
∀ i, BddAbove (range fun k ↦ (q i).comp (f k)) ∧ Continuous (⨆ k, (q i).comp (f k)) ] := by
-- We start by reducing to the case where the target is a seminormed space
rw [q.withSeminorms_iff_uniformSpace_eq_iInf.mp hq, uniformEquicontinuous_iInf_rng,
equicontinuous_iInf_rng, equicontinuousAt_iInf_rng]
refine forall_tfae [_, _, _, _, _] fun i ↦ ?_
let _ : SeminormedAddCommGroup F := (q i).toSeminormedAddCommGroup
clear u hu hq
-- Now we can prove the equivalence in this setting
simp only [List.map]
| Mathlib/Analysis/LocallyConvex/WithSeminorms.lean | 610 | 623 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.FundThmCalculus
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.Set
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-15")
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/SetIntegral.lean | 691 | 711 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Wrenna Robson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.FieldDivision
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Vandermonde
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Basic
/-!
# Lagrange interpolation
## Main definitions
* In everything that follows, `s : Finset ι` is a finite set of indexes, with `v : ι → F` an
indexing of the field over some type. We call the image of v on s the interpolation nodes,
though strictly unique nodes are only defined when v is injective on s.
* `Lagrange.basisDivisor x y`, with `x y : F`. These are the normalised irreducible factors of
the Lagrange basis polynomials. They evaluate to `1` at `x` and `0` at `y` when `x` and `y`
are distinct.
* `Lagrange.basis v i` with `i : ι`: the Lagrange basis polynomial that evaluates to `1` at `v i`
and `0` at `v j` for `i ≠ j`.
* `Lagrange.interpolate v r` where `r : ι → F` is a function from the fintype to the field: the
Lagrange interpolant that evaluates to `r i` at `x i` for all `i : ι`. The `r i` are the _values_
associated with the _nodes_`x i`.
-/
open Polynomial
section PolynomialDetermination
namespace Polynomial
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] {f g : R[X]}
section Finset
open Function Fintype
open scoped Finset
variable (s : Finset R)
theorem eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_finset_eq_zero (degree_f_lt : f.degree < #s)
(eval_f : ∀ x ∈ s, f.eval x = 0) : f = 0 := by
rw [← mem_degreeLT] at degree_f_lt
simp_rw [eval_eq_sum_degreeLTEquiv degree_f_lt] at eval_f
rw [← degreeLTEquiv_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero degree_f_lt]
exact
Matrix.eq_zero_of_forall_index_sum_mul_pow_eq_zero
(Injective.comp (Embedding.subtype _).inj' (equivFinOfCardEq (card_coe _)).symm.injective)
fun _ => eval_f _ (Finset.coe_mem _)
theorem eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_finset_eq (degree_fg_lt : (f - g).degree < #s)
(eval_fg : ∀ x ∈ s, f.eval x = g.eval x) : f = g := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
refine eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_finset_eq_zero _ degree_fg_lt ?_
simp_rw [eval_sub, sub_eq_zero]
exact eval_fg
theorem eq_of_degrees_lt_of_eval_finset_eq (degree_f_lt : f.degree < #s)
(degree_g_lt : g.degree < #s) (eval_fg : ∀ x ∈ s, f.eval x = g.eval x) : f = g := by
rw [← mem_degreeLT] at degree_f_lt degree_g_lt
refine eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_finset_eq _ ?_ eval_fg
rw [← mem_degreeLT]; exact Submodule.sub_mem _ degree_f_lt degree_g_lt
/--
Two polynomials, with the same degree and leading coefficient, which have the same evaluation
on a set of distinct values with cardinality equal to the degree, are equal.
-/
theorem eq_of_degree_le_of_eval_finset_eq
(h_deg_le : f.degree ≤ #s)
(h_deg_eq : f.degree = g.degree)
(hlc : f.leadingCoeff = g.leadingCoeff)
(h_eval : ∀ x ∈ s, f.eval x = g.eval x) :
f = g := by
rcases eq_or_ne f 0 with rfl | hf
· rwa [degree_zero, eq_comm, degree_eq_bot, eq_comm] at h_deg_eq
· exact eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_finset_eq s
(lt_of_lt_of_le (degree_sub_lt h_deg_eq hf hlc) h_deg_le) h_eval
end Finset
section Indexed
open Finset
variable {ι : Type*} {v : ι → R} (s : Finset ι)
theorem eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_index_eq_zero (hvs : Set.InjOn v s)
(degree_f_lt : f.degree < #s) (eval_f : ∀ i ∈ s, f.eval (v i) = 0) : f = 0 := by
classical
rw [← card_image_of_injOn hvs] at degree_f_lt
refine eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_finset_eq_zero _ degree_f_lt ?_
intro x hx
rcases mem_image.mp hx with ⟨_, hj, rfl⟩
exact eval_f _ hj
theorem eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_index_eq (hvs : Set.InjOn v s)
(degree_fg_lt : (f - g).degree < #s) (eval_fg : ∀ i ∈ s, f.eval (v i) = g.eval (v i)) :
f = g := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
refine eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_index_eq_zero _ hvs degree_fg_lt ?_
simp_rw [eval_sub, sub_eq_zero]
exact eval_fg
theorem eq_of_degrees_lt_of_eval_index_eq (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (degree_f_lt : f.degree < #s)
(degree_g_lt : g.degree < #s) (eval_fg : ∀ i ∈ s, f.eval (v i) = g.eval (v i)) : f = g := by
refine eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_index_eq _ hvs ?_ eval_fg
rw [← mem_degreeLT] at degree_f_lt degree_g_lt ⊢
exact Submodule.sub_mem _ degree_f_lt degree_g_lt
theorem eq_of_degree_le_of_eval_index_eq (hvs : Set.InjOn v s)
(h_deg_le : f.degree ≤ #s)
(h_deg_eq : f.degree = g.degree)
(hlc : f.leadingCoeff = g.leadingCoeff)
(h_eval : ∀ i ∈ s, f.eval (v i) = g.eval (v i)) : f = g := by
rcases eq_or_ne f 0 with rfl | hf
· rwa [degree_zero, eq_comm, degree_eq_bot, eq_comm] at h_deg_eq
· exact eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_index_eq s hvs
(lt_of_lt_of_le (degree_sub_lt h_deg_eq hf hlc) h_deg_le)
h_eval
end Indexed
end Polynomial
end PolynomialDetermination
noncomputable section
namespace Lagrange
open Polynomial
section BasisDivisor
variable {F : Type*} [Field F]
variable {x y : F}
/-- `basisDivisor x y` is the unique linear or constant polynomial such that
when evaluated at `x` it gives `1` and `y` it gives `0` (where when `x = y` it is identically `0`).
Such polynomials are the building blocks for the Lagrange interpolants. -/
def basisDivisor (x y : F) : F[X] :=
C (x - y)⁻¹ * (X - C y)
theorem basisDivisor_self : basisDivisor x x = 0 := by
simp only [basisDivisor, sub_self, inv_zero, map_zero, zero_mul]
theorem basisDivisor_inj (hxy : basisDivisor x y = 0) : x = y := by
simp_rw [basisDivisor, mul_eq_zero, X_sub_C_ne_zero, or_false, C_eq_zero, inv_eq_zero,
sub_eq_zero] at hxy
exact hxy
@[simp]
theorem basisDivisor_eq_zero_iff : basisDivisor x y = 0 ↔ x = y :=
⟨basisDivisor_inj, fun H => H ▸ basisDivisor_self⟩
theorem basisDivisor_ne_zero_iff : basisDivisor x y ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ y := by
rw [Ne, basisDivisor_eq_zero_iff]
theorem degree_basisDivisor_of_ne (hxy : x ≠ y) : (basisDivisor x y).degree = 1 := by
rw [basisDivisor, degree_mul, degree_X_sub_C, degree_C, zero_add]
exact inv_ne_zero (sub_ne_zero_of_ne hxy)
@[simp]
theorem degree_basisDivisor_self : (basisDivisor x x).degree = ⊥ := by
rw [basisDivisor_self, degree_zero]
theorem natDegree_basisDivisor_self : (basisDivisor x x).natDegree = 0 := by
rw [basisDivisor_self, natDegree_zero]
theorem natDegree_basisDivisor_of_ne (hxy : x ≠ y) : (basisDivisor x y).natDegree = 1 :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some (degree_basisDivisor_of_ne hxy)
@[simp]
theorem eval_basisDivisor_right : eval y (basisDivisor x y) = 0 := by
simp only [basisDivisor, eval_mul, eval_C, eval_sub, eval_X, sub_self, mul_zero]
theorem eval_basisDivisor_left_of_ne (hxy : x ≠ y) : eval x (basisDivisor x y) = 1 := by
simp only [basisDivisor, eval_mul, eval_C, eval_sub, eval_X]
exact inv_mul_cancel₀ (sub_ne_zero_of_ne hxy)
end BasisDivisor
section Basis
variable {F : Type*} [Field F] {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι]
variable {s : Finset ι} {v : ι → F} {i j : ι}
open Finset
/-- Lagrange basis polynomials indexed by `s : Finset ι`, defined at nodes `v i` for a
map `v : ι → F`. For `i, j ∈ s`, `basis s v i` evaluates to 0 at `v j` for `i ≠ j`. When
`v` is injective on `s`, `basis s v i` evaluates to 1 at `v i`. -/
protected def basis (s : Finset ι) (v : ι → F) (i : ι) : F[X] :=
∏ j ∈ s.erase i, basisDivisor (v i) (v j)
@[simp]
theorem basis_empty : Lagrange.basis ∅ v i = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem basis_singleton (i : ι) : Lagrange.basis {i} v i = 1 := by
rw [Lagrange.basis, erase_singleton, prod_empty]
@[simp]
theorem basis_pair_left (hij : i ≠ j) : Lagrange.basis {i, j} v i = basisDivisor (v i) (v j) := by
simp only [Lagrange.basis, hij, erase_insert_eq_erase, erase_eq_of_not_mem, mem_singleton,
not_false_iff, prod_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem basis_pair_right (hij : i ≠ j) : Lagrange.basis {i, j} v j = basisDivisor (v j) (v i) := by
rw [pair_comm]
exact basis_pair_left hij.symm
theorem basis_ne_zero (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hi : i ∈ s) : Lagrange.basis s v i ≠ 0 := by
simp_rw [Lagrange.basis, prod_ne_zero_iff, Ne, mem_erase]
rintro j ⟨hij, hj⟩
rw [basisDivisor_eq_zero_iff, hvs.eq_iff hi hj]
exact hij.symm
@[simp]
theorem eval_basis_self (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hi : i ∈ s) :
(Lagrange.basis s v i).eval (v i) = 1 := by
rw [Lagrange.basis, eval_prod]
refine prod_eq_one fun j H => ?_
rw [eval_basisDivisor_left_of_ne]
rcases mem_erase.mp H with ⟨hij, hj⟩
exact mt (hvs hi hj) hij.symm
@[simp]
theorem eval_basis_of_ne (hij : i ≠ j) (hj : j ∈ s) : (Lagrange.basis s v i).eval (v j) = 0 := by
simp_rw [Lagrange.basis, eval_prod, prod_eq_zero_iff]
exact ⟨j, ⟨mem_erase.mpr ⟨hij.symm, hj⟩, eval_basisDivisor_right⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_basis (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hi : i ∈ s) :
| (Lagrange.basis s v i).natDegree = #s - 1 := by
have H : ∀ j, j ∈ s.erase i → basisDivisor (v i) (v j) ≠ 0 := by
simp_rw [Ne, mem_erase, basisDivisor_eq_zero_iff]
exact fun j ⟨hij₁, hj⟩ hij₂ => hij₁ (hvs hj hi hij₂.symm)
rw [← card_erase_of_mem hi, card_eq_sum_ones]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Lagrange.lean | 238 | 242 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Sheaf
/-!
# 1-hypercovers
Given a Grothendieck topology `J` on a category `C`, we define the type of
`1`-hypercovers of an object `S : C`. They consists of a covering family
of morphisms `X i ⟶ S` indexed by a type `I₀` and, for each tuple `(i₁, i₂)`
of elements of `I₀`, a "covering `Y j` of the fibre product of `X i₁` and
`X i₂` over `S`", a condition which is phrased here without assuming that
the fibre product actually exist.
The definition `OneHypercover.isLimitMultifork` shows that if `E` is a
`1`-hypercover of `S`, and `F` is a sheaf, then `F.obj (op S)`
identifies to the multiequalizer of suitable maps
`F.obj (op (E.X i)) ⟶ F.obj (op (E.Y j))`.
-/
universe w v u
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] {A : Type*} [Category A]
/-- The categorical data that is involved in a `1`-hypercover of an object `S`. This
consists of a family of morphisms `f i : X i ⟶ S` for `i : I₀`, and for each
tuple `(i₁, i₂)` of elements in `I₀`, a family of objects `Y j` indexed by
a type `I₁ i₁ i₂`, which are equipped with a map to the fibre product of `X i₁`
and `X i₂`, which is phrased here as the data of the two projections
`p₁ : Y j ⟶ X i₁`, `p₂ : Y j ⟶ X i₂` and the relation `p₁ j ≫ f i₁ = p₂ j ≫ f i₂`.
(See `GrothendieckTopology.OneHypercover` for the topological conditions.) -/
structure PreOneHypercover (S : C) where
/-- the index type of the covering of `S` -/
I₀ : Type w
/-- the objects in the covering of `S` -/
X (i : I₀) : C
/-- the morphisms in the covering of `S` -/
f (i : I₀) : X i ⟶ S
/-- the index type of the coverings of the fibre products -/
I₁ (i₁ i₂ : I₀) : Type w
/-- the objects in the coverings of the fibre products -/
Y ⦃i₁ i₂ : I₀⦄ (j : I₁ i₁ i₂) : C
/-- the first projection `Y j ⟶ X i₁` -/
p₁ ⦃i₁ i₂ : I₀⦄ (j : I₁ i₁ i₂) : Y j ⟶ X i₁
/-- the second projection `Y j ⟶ X i₂` -/
p₂ ⦃i₁ i₂ : I₀⦄ (j : I₁ i₁ i₂) : Y j ⟶ X i₂
w ⦃i₁ i₂ : I₀⦄ (j : I₁ i₁ i₂) : p₁ j ≫ f i₁ = p₂ j ≫ f i₂
namespace PreOneHypercover
variable {S : C} (E : PreOneHypercover.{w} S)
/-- The assumption that the pullback of `X i₁` and `X i₂` over `S` exists
for any `i₁` and `i₂`. -/
abbrev HasPullbacks := ∀ (i₁ i₂ : E.I₀), HasPullback (E.f i₁) (E.f i₂)
/-- The sieve of `S` that is generated by the morphisms `f i : X i ⟶ S`. -/
abbrev sieve₀ : Sieve S := Sieve.ofArrows _ E.f
/-- Given an object `W` equipped with morphisms `p₁ : W ⟶ E.X i₁`, `p₂ : W ⟶ E.X i₂`,
this is the sieve of `W` which consists of morphisms `g : Z ⟶ W` such that there exists `j`
and `h : Z ⟶ E.Y j` such that `g ≫ p₁ = h ≫ E.p₁ j` and `g ≫ p₂ = h ≫ E.p₂ j`.
See lemmas `sieve₁_eq_pullback_sieve₁'` and `sieve₁'_eq_sieve₁` for equational lemmas
regarding this sieve. -/
@[simps]
def sieve₁ {i₁ i₂ : E.I₀} {W : C} (p₁ : W ⟶ E.X i₁) (p₂ : W ⟶ E.X i₂) : Sieve W where
arrows Z g := ∃ (j : E.I₁ i₁ i₂) (h : Z ⟶ E.Y j), g ≫ p₁ = h ≫ E.p₁ j ∧ g ≫ p₂ = h ≫ E.p₂ j
downward_closed := by
rintro Z Z' g ⟨j, h, fac₁, fac₂⟩ φ
exact ⟨j, φ ≫ h, by simpa using φ ≫= fac₁, by simpa using φ ≫= fac₂⟩
section
variable {i₁ i₂ : E.I₀} [HasPullback (E.f i₁) (E.f i₂)]
/-- The obvious morphism `E.Y j ⟶ pullback (E.f i₁) (E.f i₂)` given by `E : PreOneHypercover S`. -/
noncomputable abbrev toPullback (j : E.I₁ i₁ i₂) [HasPullback (E.f i₁) (E.f i₂)] :
E.Y j ⟶ pullback (E.f i₁) (E.f i₂) :=
pullback.lift (E.p₁ j) (E.p₂ j) (E.w j)
variable (i₁ i₂) in
/-- The sieve of `pullback (E.f i₁) (E.f i₂)` given by `E : PreOneHypercover S`. -/
def sieve₁' : Sieve (pullback (E.f i₁) (E.f i₂)) :=
Sieve.ofArrows _ (fun (j : E.I₁ i₁ i₂) => E.toPullback j)
lemma sieve₁_eq_pullback_sieve₁' {W : C} (p₁ : W ⟶ E.X i₁) (p₂ : W ⟶ E.X i₂)
(w : p₁ ≫ E.f i₁ = p₂ ≫ E.f i₂) :
E.sieve₁ p₁ p₂ = (E.sieve₁' i₁ i₂).pullback (pullback.lift _ _ w) := by
ext Z g
constructor
· rintro ⟨j, h, fac₁, fac₂⟩
exact ⟨_, h, _, ⟨j⟩, by aesop_cat⟩
· rintro ⟨_, h, w, ⟨j⟩, fac⟩
exact ⟨j, h, by simpa using fac.symm =≫ pullback.fst _ _,
by simpa using fac.symm =≫ pullback.snd _ _⟩
variable (i₁ i₂) in
lemma sieve₁'_eq_sieve₁ : E.sieve₁' i₁ i₂ = E.sieve₁ (pullback.fst _ _) (pullback.snd _ _) := by
rw [← Sieve.pullback_id (S := E.sieve₁' i₁ i₂),
sieve₁_eq_pullback_sieve₁' _ _ _ pullback.condition]
congr
aesop_cat
end
/-- The sigma type of all `E.I₁ i₁ i₂` for `⟨i₁, i₂⟩ : E.I₀ × E.I₀`. -/
abbrev I₁' : Type w := Sigma (fun (i : E.I₀ × E.I₀) => E.I₁ i.1 i.2)
/-- The shape of the multiforks attached to `E : PreOneHypercover S`. -/
@[simps]
def multicospanShape : MulticospanShape where
L := E.I₀
R := E.I₁'
fst j := j.1.1
snd j := j.1.2
/-- The diagram of the multifork attached to a presheaf
`F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A`, `S : C` and `E : PreOneHypercover S`. -/
@[simps]
def multicospanIndex (F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A) : MulticospanIndex E.multicospanShape A where
left i := F.obj (Opposite.op (E.X i))
right j := F.obj (Opposite.op (E.Y j.2))
fst j := F.map ((E.p₁ j.2).op)
snd j := F.map ((E.p₂ j.2).op)
/-- The multifork attached to a presheaf `F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A`, `S : C` and `E : PreOneHypercover S`. -/
def multifork (F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A) :
Multifork (E.multicospanIndex F) :=
Multifork.ofι _ (F.obj (Opposite.op S)) (fun i₀ => F.map (E.f i₀).op) (by
rintro ⟨⟨i₁, i₂⟩, (j : E.I₁ i₁ i₂)⟩
dsimp
simp only [← F.map_comp, ← op_comp, E.w])
end PreOneHypercover
namespace GrothendieckTopology
variable (J : GrothendieckTopology C)
/-- The type of `1`-hypercovers of an object `S : C` in a category equipped with a
Grothendieck topology `J`. This can be constructed from a covering of `S` and
a covering of the fibre products of the objects in this covering (see `OneHypercover.mk'`). -/
structure OneHypercover (S : C) extends PreOneHypercover.{w} S where
mem₀ : toPreOneHypercover.sieve₀ ∈ J S
mem₁ (i₁ i₂ : I₀) ⦃W : C⦄ (p₁ : W ⟶ X i₁) (p₂ : W ⟶ X i₂) (w : p₁ ≫ f i₁ = p₂ ≫ f i₂) :
toPreOneHypercover.sieve₁ p₁ p₂ ∈ J W
variable {J}
lemma OneHypercover.mem_sieve₁' {S : C} (E : J.OneHypercover S)
(i₁ i₂ : E.I₀) [HasPullback (E.f i₁) (E.f i₂)] :
E.sieve₁' i₁ i₂ ∈ J _ := by
rw [E.sieve₁'_eq_sieve₁]
exact mem₁ _ _ _ _ _ pullback.condition
namespace OneHypercover
/-- In order to check that a certain data is a `1`-hypercover of `S`, it suffices to
check that the data provides a covering of `S` and of the fibre products. -/
@[simps toPreOneHypercover]
def mk' {S : C} (E : PreOneHypercover S) [E.HasPullbacks]
(mem₀ : E.sieve₀ ∈ J S) (mem₁' : ∀ (i₁ i₂ : E.I₀), E.sieve₁' i₁ i₂ ∈ J _) :
J.OneHypercover S where
toPreOneHypercover := E
mem₀ := mem₀
mem₁ i₁ i₂ W p₁ p₂ w := by
rw [E.sieve₁_eq_pullback_sieve₁' _ _ w]
exact J.pullback_stable' _ (mem₁' i₁ i₂)
section
variable {S : C} (E : J.OneHypercover S) (F : Sheaf J A)
section
variable {E F}
variable (c : Multifork (E.multicospanIndex F.val))
/-- Auxiliary definition of `isLimitMultifork`. -/
noncomputable def multiforkLift : c.pt ⟶ F.val.obj (Opposite.op S) :=
F.cond.amalgamateOfArrows _ E.mem₀ c.ι (fun W i₁ i₂ p₁ p₂ w => by
apply F.cond.hom_ext ⟨_, E.mem₁ _ _ _ _ w⟩
rintro ⟨T, g, j, h, fac₁, fac₂⟩
dsimp
simp only [assoc, ← Functor.map_comp, ← op_comp, fac₁, fac₂]
simp only [op_comp, Functor.map_comp]
simpa using c.condition ⟨⟨i₁, i₂⟩, j⟩ =≫ F.val.map h.op)
@[reassoc]
lemma multiforkLift_map (i₀ : E.I₀) : multiforkLift c ≫ F.val.map (E.f i₀).op = c.ι i₀ := by
simp [multiforkLift]
end
/-- If `E : J.OneHypercover S` and `F : Sheaf J A`, then `F.obj (op S)` is
a multiequalizer of suitable maps `F.obj (op (E.X i)) ⟶ F.obj (op (E.Y j))`
induced by `E.p₁ j` and `E.p₂ j`. -/
noncomputable def isLimitMultifork : IsLimit (E.multifork F.1) :=
Multifork.IsLimit.mk _ (fun c => multiforkLift c) (fun c => multiforkLift_map c) (by
intro c m hm
apply F.cond.hom_ext_ofArrows _ E.mem₀
intro i₀
dsimp only
rw [multiforkLift_map]
exact hm i₀)
end
end OneHypercover
namespace Cover
variable {X : C} (S : J.Cover X)
/-- The tautological 1-pre-hypercover induced by `S : J.Cover X`. Its index type `I₀`
is given by `S.Arrow` (i.e. all the morphisms in the sieve `S`), while `I₁` is given
by all possible pullback cones. -/
@[simps]
def preOneHypercover : PreOneHypercover.{max u v} X where
I₀ := S.Arrow
X f := f.Y
f f := f.f
I₁ f₁ f₂ := f₁.Relation f₂
Y _ _ r := r.Z
| p₁ _ _ r := r.g₁
p₂ _ _ r := r.g₂
w _ _ r := r.w
@[simp]
lemma preOneHypercover_sieve₀ : S.preOneHypercover.sieve₀ = S.1 := by
ext Y f
constructor
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/OneHypercover.lean | 233 | 240 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Single
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.HomologicalComplex
/-!
# The homology of single complexes
The main definition in this file is `HomologicalComplex.homologyFunctorSingleIso`
which is a natural isomorphism `single C c j ⋙ homologyFunctor C c j ≅ 𝟭 C`.
-/
universe v u
open CategoryTheory Category Limits ZeroObject
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [HasZeroMorphisms C] [HasZeroObject C]
{ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] (c : ComplexShape ι) (j : ι)
namespace HomologicalComplex
variable (A : C)
instance (i : ι) : ((single C c j).obj A).HasHomology i := by
apply ShortComplex.hasHomology_of_zeros
lemma exactAt_single_obj (A : C) (i : ι) (hi : i ≠ j) :
ExactAt ((single C c j).obj A) i :=
ShortComplex.exact_of_isZero_X₂ _ (isZero_single_obj_X c _ _ _ hi)
| lemma isZero_single_obj_homology (A : C) (i : ι) (hi : i ≠ j) :
IsZero (((single C c j).obj A).homology i) := by
simpa only [← exactAt_iff_isZero_homology]
using exactAt_single_obj c j A i hi
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/SingleHomology.lean | 34 | 37 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yakov Pechersky. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Canonical.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.OrderDual
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.List.Basic
/-!
# Big operators on a list in ordered groups
This file contains the results concerning the interaction of list big operators with ordered
groups/monoids.
-/
variable {ι α M N : Type*}
namespace List
section Monoid
variable [Monoid M]
| @[to_additive sum_le_sum]
lemma Forall₂.prod_le_prod' [Preorder M] [MulRightMono M]
[MulLeftMono M] {l₁ l₂ : List M} (h : Forall₂ (· ≤ ·) l₁ l₂) :
l₁.prod ≤ l₂.prod := by
induction h with
| nil => rfl
| cons hab ih ih' => simpa only [prod_cons] using mul_le_mul' hab ih'
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/BigOperators/Group/List.lean | 23 | 29 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Mario Carneiro, Reid Barton, Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.Opens
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Unique
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.KanExtension.Adjunction
import Mathlib.Topology.Sheaves.Init
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
/-!
# Presheaves on a topological space
We define `TopCat.Presheaf C X` simply as `(TopologicalSpace.Opens X)ᵒᵖ ⥤ C`,
and inherit the category structure with natural transformations as morphisms.
We define
* Given `{X Y : TopCat.{w}}` and `f : X ⟶ Y`, we define
`TopCat.Presheaf.pushforward C f : X.Presheaf C ⥤ Y.Presheaf C`,
with notation `f _* ℱ` for `ℱ : X.Presheaf C`.
and for `ℱ : X.Presheaf C` provide the natural isomorphisms
* `TopCat.Presheaf.Pushforward.id : (𝟙 X) _* ℱ ≅ ℱ`
* `TopCat.Presheaf.Pushforward.comp : (f ≫ g) _* ℱ ≅ g _* (f _* ℱ)`
along with their `@[simp]` lemmas.
We also define the functors `pullback C f : Y.Presheaf C ⥤ X.Presheaf c`,
and provide their adjunction at
`TopCat.Presheaf.pushforwardPullbackAdjunction`.
-/
universe w v u
open CategoryTheory TopologicalSpace Opposite
variable (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C]
namespace TopCat
/-- The category of `C`-valued presheaves on a (bundled) topological space `X`. -/
def Presheaf (X : TopCat.{w}) : Type max u v w :=
(Opens X)ᵒᵖ ⥤ C
instance (X : TopCat.{w}) : Category (Presheaf.{w, v, u} C X) :=
inferInstanceAs (Category ((Opens X)ᵒᵖ ⥤ C : Type max u v w))
variable {C}
namespace Presheaf
@[simp] theorem comp_app {X : TopCat} {U : (Opens X)ᵒᵖ} {P Q R : Presheaf C X}
(f : P ⟶ Q) (g : Q ⟶ R) :
(f ≫ g).app U = f.app U ≫ g.app U := rfl
@[ext]
lemma ext {X : TopCat} {P Q : Presheaf C X} {f g : P ⟶ Q}
(w : ∀ U : Opens X, f.app (op U) = g.app (op U)) :
f = g := by
apply NatTrans.ext
ext U
induction U with | _ U => ?_
apply w
/-- attribute `sheaf_restrict` to mark lemmas related to restricting sheaves -/
macro "sheaf_restrict" : attr =>
`(attr|aesop safe 50 apply (rule_sets := [$(Lean.mkIdent `Restrict):ident]))
attribute [sheaf_restrict] bot_le le_top le_refl inf_le_left inf_le_right
le_sup_left le_sup_right
/-- `restrict_tac` solves relations among subsets (copied from `aesop cat`) -/
macro (name := restrict_tac) "restrict_tac" c:Aesop.tactic_clause* : tactic =>
`(tactic| first | assumption |
aesop $c*
(config := { terminal := true
assumptionTransparency := .reducible
enableSimp := false })
(rule_sets := [-default, -builtin, $(Lean.mkIdent `Restrict):ident]))
/-- `restrict_tac?` passes along `Try this` from `aesop` -/
macro (name := restrict_tac?) "restrict_tac?" c:Aesop.tactic_clause* : tactic =>
`(tactic|
aesop? $c*
(config := { terminal := true
assumptionTransparency := .reducible
enableSimp := false
maxRuleApplications := 300 })
(rule_sets := [-default, -builtin, $(Lean.mkIdent `Restrict):ident]))
attribute[aesop 10% (rule_sets := [Restrict])] le_trans
attribute[aesop safe destruct (rule_sets := [Restrict])] Eq.trans_le
attribute[aesop safe -50 (rule_sets := [Restrict])] Aesop.BuiltinRules.assumption
example {X} [CompleteLattice X] (v : Nat → X) (w x y z : X) (e : v 0 = v 1) (_ : v 1 = v 2)
(h₀ : v 1 ≤ x) (_ : x ≤ z ⊓ w) (h₂ : x ≤ y ⊓ z) : v 0 ≤ y := by
restrict_tac
variable {X : TopCat} {C : Type*} [Category C] {FC : C → C → Type*} {CC : C → Type*}
variable [∀ X Y, FunLike (FC X Y) (CC X) (CC Y)] [ConcreteCategory C FC]
/-- The restriction of a section along an inclusion of open sets.
For `x : F.obj (op V)`, we provide the notation `x |_ₕ i` (`h` stands for `hom`) for `i : U ⟶ V`,
and the notation `x |_ₗ U ⟪i⟫` (`l` stands for `le`) for `i : U ≤ V`.
-/
def restrict {F : X.Presheaf C}
{V : Opens X} (x : ToType (F.obj (op V))) {U : Opens X} (h : U ⟶ V) : ToType (F.obj (op U)) :=
F.map h.op x
/-- restriction of a section along an inclusion -/
scoped[AlgebraicGeometry] infixl:80 " |_ₕ " => TopCat.Presheaf.restrict
/-- restriction of a section along a subset relation -/
scoped[AlgebraicGeometry] notation:80 x " |_ₗ " U " ⟪" e "⟫ " =>
@TopCat.Presheaf.restrict _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ x U (@homOfLE (Opens _) _ U _ e)
open AlgebraicGeometry
/-- The restriction of a section along an inclusion of open sets.
For `x : F.obj (op V)`, we provide the notation `x |_ U`, where the proof `U ≤ V` is inferred by
the tactic `Top.presheaf.restrict_tac'` -/
abbrev restrictOpen {F : X.Presheaf C}
{V : Opens X} (x : ToType (F.obj (op V))) (U : Opens X)
(e : U ≤ V := by restrict_tac) :
ToType (F.obj (op U)) :=
x |_ₗ U ⟪e⟫
/-- restriction of a section to open subset -/
scoped[AlgebraicGeometry] infixl:80 " |_ " => TopCat.Presheaf.restrictOpen
theorem restrict_restrict
{F : X.Presheaf C} {U V W : Opens X} (e₁ : U ≤ V) (e₂ : V ≤ W) (x : ToType (F.obj (op W))) :
x |_ V |_ U = x |_ U := by
delta restrictOpen restrict
rw [← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, ← Functor.map_comp]
rfl
theorem map_restrict
{F G : X.Presheaf C} (e : F ⟶ G) {U V : Opens X} (h : U ≤ V) (x : ToType (F.obj (op V))) :
e.app _ (x |_ U) = e.app _ x |_ U := by
delta restrictOpen restrict
rw [← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply, NatTrans.naturality, ConcreteCategory.comp_apply]
open CategoryTheory.Limits
variable (C)
/-- The pushforward functor. -/
@[simps!]
def pushforward {X Y : TopCat.{w}} (f : X ⟶ Y) : X.Presheaf C ⥤ Y.Presheaf C :=
(whiskeringLeft _ _ _).obj (Opens.map f).op
/-- push forward of a presheaf -/
scoped[AlgebraicGeometry] notation f:80 " _* " P:81 =>
Prefunctor.obj (Functor.toPrefunctor (TopCat.Presheaf.pushforward _ f)) P
@[simp]
theorem pushforward_map_app' {X Y : TopCat.{w}} (f : X ⟶ Y) {ℱ 𝒢 : X.Presheaf C} (α : ℱ ⟶ 𝒢)
{U : (Opens Y)ᵒᵖ} : ((pushforward C f).map α).app U = α.app (op <| (Opens.map f).obj U.unop) :=
rfl
lemma id_pushforward (X : TopCat.{w}) : pushforward C (𝟙 X) = 𝟭 (X.Presheaf C) := rfl
variable {C}
namespace Pushforward
/-- The natural isomorphism between the pushforward of a presheaf along the identity continuous map
and the original presheaf. -/
def id {X : TopCat.{w}} (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) : 𝟙 X _* ℱ ≅ ℱ := Iso.refl _
@[simp]
theorem id_hom_app {X : TopCat.{w}} (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) (U) : (id ℱ).hom.app U = 𝟙 _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem id_inv_app {X : TopCat.{w}} (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) (U) :
(id ℱ).inv.app U = 𝟙 _ := rfl
theorem id_eq {X : TopCat.{w}} (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) : 𝟙 X _* ℱ = ℱ := rfl
/-- The natural isomorphism between
the pushforward of a presheaf along the composition of two continuous maps and
the corresponding pushforward of a pushforward. -/
def comp {X Y Z : TopCat.{w}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) :
(f ≫ g) _* ℱ ≅ g _* (f _* ℱ) := Iso.refl _
theorem comp_eq {X Y Z : TopCat.{w}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) :
(f ≫ g) _* ℱ = g _* (f _* ℱ) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_hom_app {X Y Z : TopCat.{w}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) (U) :
(comp f g ℱ).hom.app U = 𝟙 _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_inv_app {X Y Z : TopCat.{w}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) (U) :
(comp f g ℱ).inv.app U = 𝟙 _ := rfl
end Pushforward
/--
An equality of continuous maps induces a natural isomorphism between the pushforwards of a presheaf
along those maps.
-/
def pushforwardEq {X Y : TopCat.{w}} {f g : X ⟶ Y} (h : f = g) (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) :
f _* ℱ ≅ g _* ℱ :=
isoWhiskerRight (NatIso.op (Opens.mapIso f g h).symm) ℱ
theorem pushforward_eq' {X Y : TopCat.{w}} {f g : X ⟶ Y} (h : f = g) (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) :
f _* ℱ = g _* ℱ := by rw [h]
@[simp]
theorem pushforwardEq_hom_app {X Y : TopCat.{w}} {f g : X ⟶ Y}
(h : f = g) (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) (U) :
(pushforwardEq h ℱ).hom.app U = ℱ.map (eqToHom (by aesop_cat)) := by
simp [pushforwardEq]
variable (C)
section Iso
/-- A homeomorphism of spaces gives an equivalence of categories of presheaves. -/
@[simps!]
def presheafEquivOfIso {X Y : TopCat} (H : X ≅ Y) : X.Presheaf C ≌ Y.Presheaf C :=
Equivalence.congrLeft (Opens.mapMapIso H).symm.op
variable {C}
/-- If `H : X ≅ Y` is a homeomorphism,
then given an `H _* ℱ ⟶ 𝒢`, we may obtain an `ℱ ⟶ H ⁻¹ _* 𝒢`.
-/
def toPushforwardOfIso {X Y : TopCat} (H : X ≅ Y) {ℱ : X.Presheaf C} {𝒢 : Y.Presheaf C}
(α : H.hom _* ℱ ⟶ 𝒢) : ℱ ⟶ H.inv _* 𝒢 :=
(presheafEquivOfIso _ H).toAdjunction.homEquiv ℱ 𝒢 α
@[simp]
theorem toPushforwardOfIso_app {X Y : TopCat} (H₁ : X ≅ Y) {ℱ : X.Presheaf C} {𝒢 : Y.Presheaf C}
(H₂ : H₁.hom _* ℱ ⟶ 𝒢) (U : (Opens X)ᵒᵖ) :
(toPushforwardOfIso H₁ H₂).app U =
ℱ.map (eqToHom (by simp [Opens.map, Set.preimage_preimage])) ≫
H₂.app (op ((Opens.map H₁.inv).obj (unop U))) := by
simp [toPushforwardOfIso, Adjunction.homEquiv_unit]
/-- If `H : X ≅ Y` is a homeomorphism,
then given an `H _* ℱ ⟶ 𝒢`, we may obtain an `ℱ ⟶ H ⁻¹ _* 𝒢`.
-/
def pushforwardToOfIso {X Y : TopCat} (H₁ : X ≅ Y) {ℱ : Y.Presheaf C} {𝒢 : X.Presheaf C}
(H₂ : ℱ ⟶ H₁.hom _* 𝒢) : H₁.inv _* ℱ ⟶ 𝒢 :=
| ((presheafEquivOfIso _ H₁.symm).toAdjunction.homEquiv ℱ 𝒢).symm H₂
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Topology/Sheaves/Presheaf.lean | 247 | 249 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Multiplicity
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Basic
/-! # Formal power series (in one variable) - Order
The `PowerSeries.order` of a formal power series `φ` is the multiplicity of the variable `X` in `φ`.
If the coefficients form an integral domain, then `PowerSeries.order` is an
additive valuation (`PowerSeries.order_mul`, `PowerSeries.min_order_le_order_add`).
We prove that if the commutative ring `R` of coefficients is an integral domain,
then the ring `R⟦X⟧` of formal power series in one variable over `R`
is an integral domain.
Given a non-zero power series `f`, `divided_by_X_pow_order f` is the power series obtained by
dividing out the largest power of X that divides `f`, that is its order. This is useful when
proving that `R⟦X⟧` is a normalization monoid, which is done in `PowerSeries.Inverse`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Finset (antidiagonal mem_antidiagonal)
namespace PowerSeries
open Finsupp (single)
variable {R : Type*}
section OrderBasic
variable [Semiring R] {φ : R⟦X⟧}
theorem exists_coeff_ne_zero_iff_ne_zero : (∃ n : ℕ, coeff R n φ ≠ 0) ↔ φ ≠ 0 := by
refine not_iff_not.mp ?_
push_neg
simp [(coeff R _).map_zero]
/-- The order of a formal power series `φ` is the greatest `n : PartENat`
such that `X^n` divides `φ`. The order is `⊤` if and only if `φ = 0`. -/
def order (φ : R⟦X⟧) : ℕ∞ :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
letI := Classical.decEq R⟦X⟧
if h : φ = 0 then ⊤ else Nat.find (exists_coeff_ne_zero_iff_ne_zero.mpr h)
/-- The order of the `0` power series is infinite. -/
@[simp]
theorem order_zero : order (0 : R⟦X⟧) = ⊤ :=
dif_pos rfl
theorem order_finite_iff_ne_zero : (order φ < ⊤) ↔ φ ≠ 0 := by
simp only [order]
split_ifs with h <;> simpa
/-- The `0` power series is the unique power series with infinite order. -/
@[simp]
theorem order_eq_top {φ : R⟦X⟧} : φ.order = ⊤ ↔ φ = 0 := by
simpa using order_finite_iff_ne_zero.not_left
theorem coe_toNat_order {φ : R⟦X⟧} (hf : φ ≠ 0) : φ.order.toNat = φ.order := by
rw [ENat.coe_toNat_eq_self.mpr (order_eq_top.not.mpr hf)]
/-- If the order of a formal power series is finite,
then the coefficient indexed by the order is nonzero. -/
theorem coeff_order (h : φ ≠ 0) : coeff R φ.order.toNat φ ≠ 0 := by
classical
simp only [order, h, not_false_iff, dif_neg]
generalize_proofs h
exact Nat.find_spec h
/-- If the `n`th coefficient of a formal power series is nonzero,
then the order of the power series is less than or equal to `n`. -/
theorem order_le (n : ℕ) (h : coeff R n φ ≠ 0) : order φ ≤ n := by
classical
rw [order, dif_neg]
· simpa using ⟨n, le_rfl, h⟩
· exact exists_coeff_ne_zero_iff_ne_zero.mp ⟨n, h⟩
/-- The `n`th coefficient of a formal power series is `0` if `n` is strictly
smaller than the order of the power series. -/
theorem coeff_of_lt_order (n : ℕ) (h : ↑n < order φ) : coeff R n φ = 0 := by
contrapose! h
exact order_le _ h
theorem coeff_of_lt_order_toNat (n : ℕ) (h : n < φ.order.toNat) : coeff R n φ = 0 := by
by_cases h' : φ = 0
· simp [h']
· refine coeff_of_lt_order _ ?_
rwa [← coe_toNat_order h', ENat.coe_lt_coe]
/-- The order of a formal power series is at least `n` if
the `i`th coefficient is `0` for all `i < n`. -/
theorem nat_le_order (φ : R⟦X⟧) (n : ℕ) (h : ∀ i < n, coeff R i φ = 0) : ↑n ≤ order φ := by
classical
simp only [order]
split_ifs
· simp
· simpa [Nat.le_find_iff]
/-- The order of a formal power series is at least `n` if
the `i`th coefficient is `0` for all `i < n`. -/
theorem le_order (φ : R⟦X⟧) (n : ℕ∞) (h : ∀ i : ℕ, ↑i < n → coeff R i φ = 0) :
n ≤ order φ := by
cases n with
| top => simpa using ext (by simpa using h)
| coe n =>
convert nat_le_order φ n _
simpa using h
/-- The order of a formal power series is exactly `n` if the `n`th coefficient is nonzero,
and the `i`th coefficient is `0` for all `i < n`. -/
| theorem order_eq_nat {φ : R⟦X⟧} {n : ℕ} :
order φ = n ↔ coeff R n φ ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ i, i < n → coeff R i φ = 0 := by
classical
rcases eq_or_ne φ 0 with (rfl | hφ)
· simp
simp [order, dif_neg hφ, Nat.find_eq_iff]
/-- The order of a formal power series is exactly `n` if the `n`th coefficient is nonzero,
and the `i`th coefficient is `0` for all `i < n`. -/
| Mathlib/RingTheory/PowerSeries/Order.lean | 121 | 129 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.CatCommSq
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.GuitartExact.Basic
/-!
# Vertical composition of Guitart exact squares
In this file, we show that the vertical composition of Guitart exact squares
is Guitart exact.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category
variable {C₁ C₂ C₃ D₁ D₂ D₃ : Type*} [Category C₁] [Category C₂] [Category C₃]
[Category D₁] [Category D₂] [Category D₃]
namespace TwoSquare
section WhiskerVertical
variable {T : C₁ ⥤ D₁} {L : C₁ ⥤ C₂} {R : D₁ ⥤ D₂} {B : C₂ ⥤ D₂} (w : TwoSquare T L R B)
{L' : C₁ ⥤ C₂} {R' : D₁ ⥤ D₂}
/-- Given `w : TwoSquare T L R B`, one may obtain a 2-square `TwoSquare T L' R' B` if we
provide natural transformations `α : L ⟶ L'` and `β : R' ⟶ R`. -/
@[simps!]
def whiskerVertical (α : L ⟶ L') (β : R' ⟶ R) :
TwoSquare T L' R' B :=
(w.whiskerLeft α).whiskerRight β
namespace GuitartExact
| /-- A 2-square stays Guitart exact if we replace the left and right functors
by isomorphic functors. See also `whiskerVertical_iff`. -/
lemma whiskerVertical [w.GuitartExact] (α : L ≅ L') (β : R ≅ R') :
(w.whiskerVertical α.hom β.inv).GuitartExact := by
rw [guitartExact_iff_initial]
intro X₂
let e : structuredArrowDownwards (w.whiskerVertical α.hom β.inv) X₂ ≅
w.structuredArrowDownwards X₂ ⋙ (StructuredArrow.mapIso (β.app X₂) ).functor :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun f => StructuredArrow.isoMk (α.symm.app f.right) (by
dsimp
simp only [NatTrans.naturality_assoc, assoc, NatIso.cancel_natIso_inv_left, ← B.map_comp,
Iso.hom_inv_id_app, B.map_id, comp_id]))
rw [Functor.initial_natIso_iff e]
infer_instance
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/GuitartExact/VerticalComposition.lean | 40 | 53 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Anatole Dedecker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformConvergenceTopology
/-!
# Equicontinuity of a family of functions
Let `X` be a topological space and `α` a `UniformSpace`. A family of functions `F : ι → X → α`
is said to be *equicontinuous at a point `x₀ : X`* when, for any entourage `U` in `α`, there is a
neighborhood `V` of `x₀` such that, for all `x ∈ V`, and *for all `i`*, `F i x` is `U`-close to
`F i x₀`. In other words, one has `∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ U`.
For maps between metric spaces, this corresponds to
`∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x, ∀ i, dist x₀ x < δ → dist (F i x₀) (F i x) < ε`.
`F` is said to be *equicontinuous* if it is equicontinuous at each point.
A closely related concept is that of ***uniform*** *equicontinuity* of a family of functions
`F : ι → β → α` between uniform spaces, which means that, for any entourage `U` in `α`, there is an
entourage `V` in `β` such that, if `x` and `y` are `V`-close, then *for all `i`*, `F i x` and
`F i y` are `U`-close. In other words, one has
`∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ xy in 𝓤 β, ∀ i, (F i xy.1, F i xy.2) ∈ U`.
For maps between metric spaces, this corresponds to
`∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x y, ∀ i, dist x y < δ → dist (F i x₀) (F i x) < ε`.
## Main definitions
* `EquicontinuousAt`: equicontinuity of a family of functions at a point
* `Equicontinuous`: equicontinuity of a family of functions on the whole domain
* `UniformEquicontinuous`: uniform equicontinuity of a family of functions on the whole domain
We also introduce relative versions, namely `EquicontinuousWithinAt`, `EquicontinuousOn` and
`UniformEquicontinuousOn`, akin to `ContinuousWithinAt`, `ContinuousOn` and `UniformContinuousOn`
respectively.
## Main statements
* `equicontinuous_iff_continuous`: equicontinuity can be expressed as a simple continuity
condition between well-chosen function spaces. This is really useful for building up the theory.
* `Equicontinuous.closure`: if a set of functions is equicontinuous, its closure
*for the topology of pointwise convergence* is also equicontinuous.
## Notations
Throughout this file, we use :
- `ι`, `κ` for indexing types
- `X`, `Y`, `Z` for topological spaces
- `α`, `β`, `γ` for uniform spaces
## Implementation details
We choose to express equicontinuity as a properties of indexed families of functions rather
than sets of functions for the following reasons:
- it is really easy to express equicontinuity of `H : Set (X → α)` using our setup: it is just
equicontinuity of the family `(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)`. On the other hand, going the other way around
would require working with the range of the family, which is always annoying because it
introduces useless existentials.
- in most applications, one doesn't work with bare functions but with a more specific hom type
`hom`. Equicontinuity of a set `H : Set hom` would then have to be expressed as equicontinuity
of `coe_fn '' H`, which is super annoying to work with. This is much simpler with families,
because equicontinuity of a family `𝓕 : ι → hom` would simply be expressed as equicontinuity
of `coe_fn ∘ 𝓕`, which doesn't introduce any nasty existentials.
To simplify statements, we do provide abbreviations `Set.EquicontinuousAt`, `Set.Equicontinuous`
and `Set.UniformEquicontinuous` asserting the corresponding fact about the family
`(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` where `H : Set (X → α)`. Note however that these won't work for sets of hom
types, and in that case one should go back to the family definition rather than using `Set.image`.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology, Chapter X*][bourbaki1966]
## Tags
equicontinuity, uniform convergence, ascoli
-/
section
open UniformSpace Filter Set Uniformity Topology UniformConvergence Function
variable {ι κ X X' Y α α' β β' γ : Type*} [tX : TopologicalSpace X] [tY : TopologicalSpace Y]
[uα : UniformSpace α] [uβ : UniformSpace β] [uγ : UniformSpace γ]
/-- A family `F : ι → X → α` of functions from a topological space to a uniform space is
*equicontinuous at `x₀ : X`* if, for all entourages `U ∈ 𝓤 α`, there is a neighborhood `V` of `x₀`
such that, for all `x ∈ V` and for all `i : ι`, `F i x` is `U`-close to `F i x₀`. -/
def EquicontinuousAt (F : ι → X → α) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ U
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is equicontinuous at a point if the family
`(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is equicontinuous at that point. -/
protected abbrev Set.EquicontinuousAt (H : Set <| X → α) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
EquicontinuousAt ((↑) : H → X → α) x₀
/-- A family `F : ι → X → α` of functions from a topological space to a uniform space is
*equicontinuous at `x₀ : X` within `S : Set X`* if, for all entourages `U ∈ 𝓤 α`, there is a
neighborhood `V` of `x₀` within `S` such that, for all `x ∈ V` and for all `i : ι`, `F i x` is
`U`-close to `F i x₀`. -/
def EquicontinuousWithinAt (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[S] x₀, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ U
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is equicontinuous at a point within a subset
if the family `(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is equicontinuous at that point within that same subset. -/
protected abbrev Set.EquicontinuousWithinAt (H : Set <| X → α) (S : Set X) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
EquicontinuousWithinAt ((↑) : H → X → α) S x₀
/-- A family `F : ι → X → α` of functions from a topological space to a uniform space is
*equicontinuous* on all of `X` if it is equicontinuous at each point of `X`. -/
def Equicontinuous (F : ι → X → α) : Prop :=
∀ x₀, EquicontinuousAt F x₀
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is equicontinuous if the family
`(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is equicontinuous. -/
protected abbrev Set.Equicontinuous (H : Set <| X → α) : Prop :=
Equicontinuous ((↑) : H → X → α)
/-- A family `F : ι → X → α` of functions from a topological space to a uniform space is
*equicontinuous on `S : Set X`* if it is equicontinuous *within `S`* at each point of `S`. -/
def EquicontinuousOn (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) : Prop :=
∀ x₀ ∈ S, EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is equicontinuous on a subset if the family
`(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is equicontinuous on that subset. -/
protected abbrev Set.EquicontinuousOn (H : Set <| X → α) (S : Set X) : Prop :=
EquicontinuousOn ((↑) : H → X → α) S
/-- A family `F : ι → β → α` of functions between uniform spaces is *uniformly equicontinuous* if,
for all entourages `U ∈ 𝓤 α`, there is an entourage `V ∈ 𝓤 β` such that, whenever `x` and `y` are
`V`-close, we have that, *for all `i : ι`*, `F i x` is `U`-close to `F i y`. -/
def UniformEquicontinuous (F : ι → β → α) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ xy : β × β in 𝓤 β, ∀ i, (F i xy.1, F i xy.2) ∈ U
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is uniformly equicontinuous if the family
`(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is uniformly equicontinuous. -/
protected abbrev Set.UniformEquicontinuous (H : Set <| β → α) : Prop :=
UniformEquicontinuous ((↑) : H → β → α)
/-- A family `F : ι → β → α` of functions between uniform spaces is
*uniformly equicontinuous on `S : Set β`* if, for all entourages `U ∈ 𝓤 α`, there is a relative
entourage `V ∈ 𝓤 β ⊓ 𝓟 (S ×ˢ S)` such that, whenever `x` and `y` are `V`-close, we have that,
*for all `i : ι`*, `F i x` is `U`-close to `F i y`. -/
def UniformEquicontinuousOn (F : ι → β → α) (S : Set β) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ xy : β × β in 𝓤 β ⊓ 𝓟 (S ×ˢ S), ∀ i, (F i xy.1, F i xy.2) ∈ U
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is uniformly equicontinuous on a subset if the
family `(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is uniformly equicontinuous on that subset. -/
protected abbrev Set.UniformEquicontinuousOn (H : Set <| β → α) (S : Set β) : Prop :=
UniformEquicontinuousOn ((↑) : H → β → α) S
lemma EquicontinuousAt.equicontinuousWithinAt {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} (H : EquicontinuousAt F x₀)
(S : Set X) : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono inf_le_left
lemma EquicontinuousWithinAt.mono {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} {S T : Set X}
(H : EquicontinuousWithinAt F T x₀) (hST : S ⊆ T) : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono <| nhdsWithin_mono x₀ hST
@[simp] lemma equicontinuousWithinAt_univ (F : ι → X → α) (x₀ : X) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F univ x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousAt F x₀ := by
rw [EquicontinuousWithinAt, EquicontinuousAt, nhdsWithin_univ]
lemma equicontinuousAt_restrict_iff (F : ι → X → α) {S : Set X} (x₀ : S) :
EquicontinuousAt (S.restrict ∘ F) x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ := by
simp [EquicontinuousWithinAt, EquicontinuousAt,
← eventually_nhds_subtype_iff]
lemma Equicontinuous.equicontinuousOn {F : ι → X → α} (H : Equicontinuous F)
(S : Set X) : EquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun x _ ↦ (H x).equicontinuousWithinAt S
lemma EquicontinuousOn.mono {F : ι → X → α} {S T : Set X}
(H : EquicontinuousOn F T) (hST : S ⊆ T) : EquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun x hx ↦ (H x (hST hx)).mono hST
lemma equicontinuousOn_univ (F : ι → X → α) :
EquicontinuousOn F univ ↔ Equicontinuous F := by
simp [EquicontinuousOn, Equicontinuous]
lemma equicontinuous_restrict_iff (F : ι → X → α) {S : Set X} :
Equicontinuous (S.restrict ∘ F) ↔ EquicontinuousOn F S := by
simp [Equicontinuous, EquicontinuousOn, equicontinuousAt_restrict_iff]
lemma UniformEquicontinuous.uniformEquicontinuousOn {F : ι → β → α} (H : UniformEquicontinuous F)
(S : Set β) : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono inf_le_left
lemma UniformEquicontinuousOn.mono {F : ι → β → α} {S T : Set β}
(H : UniformEquicontinuousOn F T) (hST : S ⊆ T) : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono <| by gcongr
lemma uniformEquicontinuousOn_univ (F : ι → β → α) :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F univ ↔ UniformEquicontinuous F := by
simp [UniformEquicontinuousOn, UniformEquicontinuous]
lemma uniformEquicontinuous_restrict_iff (F : ι → β → α) {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuous (S.restrict ∘ F) ↔ UniformEquicontinuousOn F S := by
rw [UniformEquicontinuous, UniformEquicontinuousOn]
conv in _ ⊓ _ => rw [← Subtype.range_val (s := S), ← range_prodMap, ← map_comap]
rfl
/-!
### Empty index type
-/
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuousAt_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) (x₀ : X) :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ :=
fun _ _ ↦ Eventually.of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuousWithinAt_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) (x₀ : X) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ :=
fun _ _ ↦ Eventually.of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuous_empty [IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) :
Equicontinuous F :=
equicontinuousAt_empty F
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuousOn_empty [IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) :
EquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun x₀ _ ↦ equicontinuousWithinAt_empty F S x₀
@[simp]
lemma uniformEquicontinuous_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → β → α) :
UniformEquicontinuous F :=
fun _ _ ↦ Eventually.of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
@[simp]
lemma uniformEquicontinuousOn_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → β → α) (S : Set β) :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun _ _ ↦ Eventually.of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
/-!
### Finite index type
-/
theorem equicontinuousAt_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousAt (F i) x₀ := by
simp [EquicontinuousAt, ContinuousAt, (nhds_basis_uniformity' (𝓤 α).basis_sets).tendsto_right_iff,
UniformSpace.ball, @forall_swap _ ι]
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousWithinAt (F i) S x₀ := by
simp [EquicontinuousWithinAt, ContinuousWithinAt,
(nhds_basis_uniformity' (𝓤 α).basis_sets).tendsto_right_iff, UniformSpace.ball,
@forall_swap _ ι]
theorem equicontinuous_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} :
Equicontinuous F ↔ ∀ i, Continuous (F i) := by
simp only [Equicontinuous, equicontinuousAt_finite, continuous_iff_continuousAt, @forall_swap ι]
theorem equicontinuousOn_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn F S ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousOn (F i) S := by
simp only [EquicontinuousOn, equicontinuousWithinAt_finite, ContinuousOn, @forall_swap ι]
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → β → α} :
UniformEquicontinuous F ↔ ∀ i, UniformContinuous (F i) := by
simp only [UniformEquicontinuous, eventually_all, @forall_swap _ ι]; rfl
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S ↔ ∀ i, UniformContinuousOn (F i) S := by
simp only [UniformEquicontinuousOn, eventually_all, @forall_swap _ ι]; rfl
/-!
### Index type with a unique element
-/
theorem equicontinuousAt_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → X → α} {x : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x ↔ ContinuousAt (F default) x :=
equicontinuousAt_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x : X} :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt (F default) S x :=
equicontinuousWithinAt_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem equicontinuous_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → X → α} :
Equicontinuous F ↔ Continuous (F default) :=
equicontinuous_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem equicontinuousOn_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn F S ↔ ContinuousOn (F default) S :=
equicontinuousOn_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → β → α} :
UniformEquicontinuous F ↔ UniformContinuous (F default) :=
uniformEquicontinuous_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S ↔ UniformContinuousOn (F default) S :=
uniformEquicontinuousOn_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
/-- Reformulation of equicontinuity at `x₀` within a set `S`, comparing two variables near `x₀`
instead of comparing only one with `x₀`. -/
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_pair {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} (hx₀ : x₀ ∈ S) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ V ∈ 𝓝[S] x₀, ∀ x ∈ V, ∀ y ∈ V, ∀ i, (F i x, F i y) ∈ U := by
constructor <;> intro H U hU
· rcases comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets hU with ⟨V, hV, hVsymm, hVU⟩
refine ⟨_, H V hV, fun x hx y hy i => hVU (prodMk_mem_compRel ?_ (hy i))⟩
exact hVsymm.mk_mem_comm.mp (hx i)
· rcases H U hU with ⟨V, hV, hVU⟩
filter_upwards [hV] using fun x hx i => hVU x₀ (mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin hx₀ hV) x hx i
/-- Reformulation of equicontinuity at `x₀` comparing two variables near `x₀` instead of comparing
only one with `x₀`. -/
theorem equicontinuousAt_iff_pair {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ V ∈ 𝓝 x₀, ∀ x ∈ V, ∀ y ∈ V, ∀ i, (F i x, F i y) ∈ U := by
simp_rw [← equicontinuousWithinAt_univ, equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_pair (mem_univ x₀),
nhdsWithin_univ]
/-- Uniform equicontinuity implies equicontinuity. -/
theorem UniformEquicontinuous.equicontinuous {F : ι → β → α} (h : UniformEquicontinuous F) :
Equicontinuous F := fun x₀ U hU ↦
mem_of_superset (ball_mem_nhds x₀ (h U hU)) fun _ hx i ↦ hx i
/-- Uniform equicontinuity on a subset implies equicontinuity on that subset. -/
theorem UniformEquicontinuousOn.equicontinuousOn {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β}
(h : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S) :
EquicontinuousOn F S := fun _ hx₀ U hU ↦
mem_of_superset (ball_mem_nhdsWithin hx₀ (h U hU)) fun _ hx i ↦ hx i
/-- Each function of a family equicontinuous at `x₀` is continuous at `x₀`. -/
theorem EquicontinuousAt.continuousAt {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} (h : EquicontinuousAt F x₀) (i : ι) :
ContinuousAt (F i) x₀ :=
(UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds _).tendsto_right_iff.2 fun U ⟨hU, _⟩ ↦ (h U hU).mono fun _x hx ↦ hx i
/-- Each function of a family equicontinuous at `x₀` within `S` is continuous at `x₀` within `S`. -/
theorem EquicontinuousWithinAt.continuousWithinAt {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X}
(h : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀) (i : ι) :
ContinuousWithinAt (F i) S x₀ :=
(UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds _).tendsto_right_iff.2 fun U ⟨hU, _⟩ ↦ (h U hU).mono fun _x hx ↦ hx i
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousAt.continuousAt_of_mem {H : Set <| X → α} {x₀ : X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousAt x₀) {f : X → α} (hf : f ∈ H) : ContinuousAt f x₀ :=
h.continuousAt ⟨f, hf⟩
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousWithinAt.continuousWithinAt_of_mem {H : Set <| X → α}
{S : Set X} {x₀ : X} (h : H.EquicontinuousWithinAt S x₀) {f : X → α} (hf : f ∈ H) :
ContinuousWithinAt f S x₀ :=
h.continuousWithinAt ⟨f, hf⟩
/-- Each function of an equicontinuous family is continuous. -/
theorem Equicontinuous.continuous {F : ι → X → α} (h : Equicontinuous F) (i : ι) :
Continuous (F i) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.mpr fun x => (h x).continuousAt i
/-- Each function of a family equicontinuous on `S` is continuous on `S`. -/
theorem EquicontinuousOn.continuousOn {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} (h : EquicontinuousOn F S)
(i : ι) : ContinuousOn (F i) S :=
fun x hx ↦ (h x hx).continuousWithinAt i
protected theorem Set.Equicontinuous.continuous_of_mem {H : Set <| X → α} (h : H.Equicontinuous)
{f : X → α} (hf : f ∈ H) : Continuous f :=
h.continuous ⟨f, hf⟩
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousOn.continuousOn_of_mem {H : Set <| X → α} {S : Set X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousOn S) {f : X → α} (hf : f ∈ H) : ContinuousOn f S :=
h.continuousOn ⟨f, hf⟩
/-- Each function of a uniformly equicontinuous family is uniformly continuous. -/
theorem UniformEquicontinuous.uniformContinuous {F : ι → β → α} (h : UniformEquicontinuous F)
(i : ι) : UniformContinuous (F i) := fun U hU =>
mem_map.mpr (mem_of_superset (h U hU) fun _ hxy => hxy i)
/-- Each function of a family uniformly equicontinuous on `S` is uniformly continuous on `S`. -/
theorem UniformEquicontinuousOn.uniformContinuousOn {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β}
(h : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S) (i : ι) :
UniformContinuousOn (F i) S := fun U hU =>
mem_map.mpr (mem_of_superset (h U hU) fun _ hxy => hxy i)
protected theorem Set.UniformEquicontinuous.uniformContinuous_of_mem {H : Set <| β → α}
(h : H.UniformEquicontinuous) {f : β → α} (hf : f ∈ H) : UniformContinuous f :=
h.uniformContinuous ⟨f, hf⟩
protected theorem Set.UniformEquicontinuousOn.uniformContinuousOn_of_mem {H : Set <| β → α}
{S : Set β} (h : H.UniformEquicontinuousOn S) {f : β → α} (hf : f ∈ H) :
UniformContinuousOn f S :=
h.uniformContinuousOn ⟨f, hf⟩
/-- Taking sub-families preserves equicontinuity at a point. -/
theorem EquicontinuousAt.comp {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} (h : EquicontinuousAt F x₀) (u : κ → ι) :
EquicontinuousAt (F ∘ u) x₀ := fun U hU => (h U hU).mono fun _ H k => H (u k)
/-- Taking sub-families preserves equicontinuity at a point within a subset. -/
theorem EquicontinuousWithinAt.comp {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X}
(h : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀) (u : κ → ι) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt (F ∘ u) S x₀ :=
fun U hU ↦ (h U hU).mono fun _ H k => H (u k)
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousAt.mono {H H' : Set <| X → α} {x₀ : X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousAt x₀) (hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.EquicontinuousAt x₀ :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousWithinAt.mono {H H' : Set <| X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousWithinAt S x₀) (hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.EquicontinuousWithinAt S x₀ :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
/-- Taking sub-families preserves equicontinuity. -/
theorem Equicontinuous.comp {F : ι → X → α} (h : Equicontinuous F) (u : κ → ι) :
Equicontinuous (F ∘ u) := fun x => (h x).comp u
/-- Taking sub-families preserves equicontinuity on a subset. -/
theorem EquicontinuousOn.comp {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} (h : EquicontinuousOn F S) (u : κ → ι) :
EquicontinuousOn (F ∘ u) S := fun x hx ↦ (h x hx).comp u
protected theorem Set.Equicontinuous.mono {H H' : Set <| X → α} (h : H.Equicontinuous)
(hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.Equicontinuous :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousOn.mono {H H' : Set <| X → α} {S : Set X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousOn S) (hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.EquicontinuousOn S :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
/-- Taking sub-families preserves uniform equicontinuity. -/
theorem UniformEquicontinuous.comp {F : ι → β → α} (h : UniformEquicontinuous F) (u : κ → ι) :
UniformEquicontinuous (F ∘ u) := fun U hU => (h U hU).mono fun _ H k => H (u k)
/-- Taking sub-families preserves uniform equicontinuity on a subset. -/
theorem UniformEquicontinuousOn.comp {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} (h : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S)
(u : κ → ι) : UniformEquicontinuousOn (F ∘ u) S :=
fun U hU ↦ (h U hU).mono fun _ H k => H (u k)
protected theorem Set.UniformEquicontinuous.mono {H H' : Set <| β → α} (h : H.UniformEquicontinuous)
(hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.UniformEquicontinuous :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
protected theorem Set.UniformEquicontinuousOn.mono {H H' : Set <| β → α} {S : Set β}
(h : H.UniformEquicontinuousOn S) (hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.UniformEquicontinuousOn S :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous at `x₀` iff `range 𝓕` is equicontinuous at `x₀`,
i.e the family `(↑) : range F → X → α` is equicontinuous at `x₀`. -/
theorem equicontinuousAt_iff_range {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousAt ((↑) : range F → X → α) x₀ := by
simp only [EquicontinuousAt, forall_subtype_range_iff]
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous at `x₀` within `S` iff `range 𝓕` is equicontinuous
at `x₀` within `S`, i.e the family `(↑) : range F → X → α` is equicontinuous at `x₀` within `S`. -/
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_range {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousWithinAt ((↑) : range F → X → α) S x₀ := by
simp only [EquicontinuousWithinAt, forall_subtype_range_iff]
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous iff `range 𝓕` is equicontinuous,
i.e the family `(↑) : range F → X → α` is equicontinuous. -/
theorem equicontinuous_iff_range {F : ι → X → α} :
Equicontinuous F ↔ Equicontinuous ((↑) : range F → X → α) :=
forall_congr' fun _ => equicontinuousAt_iff_range
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous on `S` iff `range 𝓕` is equicontinuous on `S`,
i.e the family `(↑) : range F → X → α` is equicontinuous on `S`. -/
theorem equicontinuousOn_iff_range {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn F S ↔ EquicontinuousOn ((↑) : range F → X → α) S :=
forall_congr' fun _ ↦ forall_congr' fun _ ↦ equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_range
| /-- A family `𝓕 : ι → β → α` is uniformly equicontinuous iff `range 𝓕` is uniformly equicontinuous,
i.e the family `(↑) : range F → β → α` is uniformly equicontinuous. -/
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_iff_range {F : ι → β → α} :
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Equicontinuity.lean | 462 | 464 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.ModEq
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Periodic
import Mathlib.Data.Int.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Order.Circular
/-!
# Reducing to an interval modulo its length
This file defines operations that reduce a number (in an `Archimedean`
`LinearOrderedAddCommGroup`) to a number in a given interval, modulo the length of that
interval.
## Main definitions
* `toIcoDiv hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`,
subtracted from `b`, is in `Ico a (a + p)`.
* `toIcoMod hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): Reduce `b` to the interval `Ico a (a + p)`.
* `toIocDiv hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`,
subtracted from `b`, is in `Ioc a (a + p)`.
* `toIocMod hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): Reduce `b` to the interval `Ioc a (a + p)`.
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
noncomputable section
section LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
variable {α : Type*} [AddCommGroup α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α] [hα : Archimedean α]
{p : α} (hp : 0 < p)
{a b c : α} {n : ℤ}
section
include hp
/--
The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`, subtracted from `b`, is in `Ico a (a + p)`. -/
def toIcoDiv (a b : α) : ℤ :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose
theorem sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico (a b : α) : b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose_spec.1
theorem toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico (h : b - n • p ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p)) :
toIcoDiv hp a b = n :=
((existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose_spec.2 _ h).symm
/--
The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`, subtracted from `b`, is in `Ioc a (a + p)`. -/
def toIocDiv (a b : α) : ℤ :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose
theorem sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc (a b : α) : b - toIocDiv hp a b • p ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose_spec.1
theorem toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc (h : b - n • p ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p)) :
toIocDiv hp a b = n :=
((existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose_spec.2 _ h).symm
/-- Reduce `b` to the interval `Ico a (a + p)`. -/
def toIcoMod (a b : α) : α :=
b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p
/-- Reduce `b` to the interval `Ioc a (a + p)`. -/
def toIocMod (a b : α) : α :=
b - toIocDiv hp a b • p
theorem toIcoMod_mem_Ico (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) :=
sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
theorem toIcoMod_mem_Ico' (b : α) : toIcoMod hp 0 b ∈ Set.Ico 0 p := by
convert toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp 0 b
exact (zero_add p).symm
theorem toIocMod_mem_Ioc (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) :=
sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
theorem left_le_toIcoMod (a b : α) : a ≤ toIcoMod hp a b :=
(Set.mem_Ico.1 (toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b)).1
theorem left_lt_toIocMod (a b : α) : a < toIocMod hp a b :=
(Set.mem_Ioc.1 (toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b)).1
theorem toIcoMod_lt_right (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b < a + p :=
(Set.mem_Ico.1 (toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b)).2
theorem toIocMod_le_right (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ≤ a + p :=
(Set.mem_Ioc.1 (toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b)).2
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p = toIcoMod hp a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIocDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : b - toIocDiv hp a b • p = toIocMod hp a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_self (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b • p - b = -toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [toIcoMod, neg_sub]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_self (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b • p - b = -toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [toIocMod, neg_sub]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub_self (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b - b = -toIcoDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_sub_cancel_left, neg_smul]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub_self (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b - b = -toIocDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_sub_cancel_left, neg_smul]
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIcoMod (a b : α) : b - toIcoMod hp a b = toIcoDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_sub_cancel]
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIocMod (a b : α) : b - toIocMod hp a b = toIocDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_sub_cancel]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b + toIcoDiv hp a b • p = b := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_add_cancel]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b + toIocDiv hp a b • p = b := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_add_cancel]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_toIcoMod (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b • p + toIcoMod hp a b = b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_toIocMod (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b • p + toIocMod hp a b = b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul]
|
theorem toIcoMod_eq_iff : toIcoMod hp a b = c ↔ c ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, b = c + z • p := by
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/ToIntervalMod.lean | 143 | 144 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Identities
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicIntegers
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Polynomial
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.CauSeqFilter
/-!
# Hensel's lemma on ℤ_p
This file proves Hensel's lemma on ℤ_p, roughly following Keith Conrad's writeup:
<http://www.math.uconn.edu/~kconrad/blurbs/gradnumthy/hensel.pdf>
Hensel's lemma gives a simple condition for the existence of a root of a polynomial.
The proof and motivation are described in the paper
[R. Y. Lewis, *A formal proof of Hensel's lemma over the p-adic integers*][lewis2019].
## References
* <http://www.math.uconn.edu/~kconrad/blurbs/gradnumthy/hensel.pdf>
* [R. Y. Lewis, *A formal proof of Hensel's lemma over the p-adic integers*][lewis2019]
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hensel%27s_lemma>
## Tags
p-adic, p adic, padic, p-adic integer
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology
-- We begin with some general lemmas that are used below in the computation.
theorem padic_polynomial_dist {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] (F : Polynomial ℤ_[p]) (x y : ℤ_[p]) :
‖F.eval x - F.eval y‖ ≤ ‖x - y‖ :=
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := F.evalSubFactor x y
calc
‖F.eval x - F.eval y‖ = ‖z‖ * ‖x - y‖ := by simp [hz]
_ ≤ 1 * ‖x - y‖ := by gcongr; apply PadicInt.norm_le_one
_ = ‖x - y‖ := by simp
open Filter Metric
private theorem comp_tendsto_lim {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] {F : Polynomial ℤ_[p]}
(ncs : CauSeq ℤ_[p] norm) : Tendsto (fun i => F.eval (ncs i)) atTop (𝓝 (F.eval ncs.lim)) :=
Filter.Tendsto.comp (@Polynomial.continuousAt _ _ _ _ F _) ncs.tendsto_limit
section
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] {ncs : CauSeq ℤ_[p] norm} {F : Polynomial ℤ_[p]}
{a : ℤ_[p]} (ncs_der_val : ∀ n, ‖F.derivative.eval (ncs n)‖ = ‖F.derivative.eval a‖)
private theorem ncs_tendsto_lim :
Tendsto (fun i => ‖F.derivative.eval (ncs i)‖) atTop (𝓝 ‖F.derivative.eval ncs.lim‖) :=
Tendsto.comp (continuous_iff_continuousAt.1 continuous_norm _) (comp_tendsto_lim _)
include ncs_der_val
private theorem ncs_tendsto_const :
Tendsto (fun i => ‖F.derivative.eval (ncs i)‖) atTop (𝓝 ‖F.derivative.eval a‖) := by
convert @tendsto_const_nhds ℝ _ ℕ _ _; rw [ncs_der_val]
private theorem norm_deriv_eq : ‖F.derivative.eval ncs.lim‖ = ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ :=
tendsto_nhds_unique ncs_tendsto_lim (ncs_tendsto_const ncs_der_val)
end
section
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] {ncs : CauSeq ℤ_[p] norm} {F : Polynomial ℤ_[p]}
(hnorm : Tendsto (fun i => ‖F.eval (ncs i)‖) atTop (𝓝 0))
include hnorm
private theorem tendsto_zero_of_norm_tendsto_zero : Tendsto (fun i => F.eval (ncs i)) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_iff_norm_sub_tendsto_zero.2 (by simpa using hnorm)
theorem limit_zero_of_norm_tendsto_zero : F.eval ncs.lim = 0 :=
tendsto_nhds_unique (comp_tendsto_lim _) (tendsto_zero_of_norm_tendsto_zero hnorm)
end
section Hensel
open Nat
variable (p : ℕ) [Fact p.Prime] (F : Polynomial ℤ_[p]) (a : ℤ_[p])
/-- `T` is an auxiliary value that is used to control the behavior of the polynomial `F`. -/
private def T_gen : ℝ := ‖F.eval a / ((F.derivative.eval a ^ 2 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p])‖
local notation "T" => @T_gen p _ F a
variable {p F a}
private theorem T_def : T = ‖F.eval a‖ / ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ ^ 2 := by
simp [T_gen, ← PadicInt.norm_def]
private theorem T_nonneg : 0 ≤ T := norm_nonneg _
private theorem T_pow_nonneg (n : ℕ) : 0 ≤ T ^ n := pow_nonneg T_nonneg _
variable (hnorm : ‖F.eval a‖ < ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ ^ 2)
include hnorm
private theorem deriv_sq_norm_pos : 0 < ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ ^ 2 :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (norm_nonneg _) hnorm
private theorem deriv_sq_norm_ne_zero : ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ ^ 2 ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt (deriv_sq_norm_pos hnorm)
private theorem deriv_norm_ne_zero : ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ ≠ 0 := fun h =>
deriv_sq_norm_ne_zero hnorm (by simp [*, sq])
private theorem deriv_norm_pos : 0 < ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg _) (Ne.symm (deriv_norm_ne_zero hnorm))
private theorem deriv_ne_zero : F.derivative.eval a ≠ 0 :=
mt norm_eq_zero.2 (deriv_norm_ne_zero hnorm)
private theorem T_lt_one : T < 1 := by
have h := (div_lt_one (deriv_sq_norm_pos hnorm)).2 hnorm
rw [T_def]; exact h
private theorem T_pow {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : T ^ n < 1 := pow_lt_one₀ T_nonneg (T_lt_one hnorm) hn
private theorem T_pow' (n : ℕ) : T ^ 2 ^ n < 1 := T_pow hnorm (pow_ne_zero _ two_ne_zero)
/-- We will construct a sequence of elements of ℤ_p satisfying successive values of `ih`. -/
private def ih_gen (n : ℕ) (z : ℤ_[p]) : Prop :=
‖F.derivative.eval z‖ = ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ ∧ ‖F.eval z‖ ≤ ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ ^ 2 * T ^ 2 ^ n
local notation "ih" => @ih_gen p _ F a
private theorem ih_0 : ih 0 a :=
⟨rfl, by simp [T_def, mul_div_cancel₀ _ (ne_of_gt (deriv_sq_norm_pos hnorm))]⟩
private theorem calc_norm_le_one {n : ℕ} {z : ℤ_[p]} (hz : ih n z) :
‖(↑(F.eval z) : ℚ_[p]) / ↑(F.derivative.eval z)‖ ≤ 1 :=
calc
‖(↑(F.eval z) : ℚ_[p]) / ↑(F.derivative.eval z)‖ =
‖(↑(F.eval z) : ℚ_[p])‖ / ‖(↑(F.derivative.eval z) : ℚ_[p])‖ :=
norm_div _ _
_ = ‖F.eval z‖ / ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ := by simp [hz.1]
_ ≤ ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ ^ 2 * T ^ 2 ^ n / ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ := by
gcongr
apply hz.2
_ = ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ * T ^ 2 ^ n := div_sq_cancel _ _
_ ≤ 1 := mul_le_one₀ (PadicInt.norm_le_one _) (T_pow_nonneg _) (le_of_lt (T_pow' hnorm _))
private theorem calc_deriv_dist {z z' z1 : ℤ_[p]} (hz' : z' = z - z1)
(hz1 : ‖z1‖ = ‖F.eval z‖ / ‖F.derivative.eval a‖) {n} (hz : ih n z) :
‖F.derivative.eval z' - F.derivative.eval z‖ < ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ :=
calc
‖F.derivative.eval z' - F.derivative.eval z‖ ≤ ‖z' - z‖ := padic_polynomial_dist _ _ _
_ = ‖z1‖ := by simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc, hz', add_add_neg_cancel'_right, norm_neg]
_ = ‖F.eval z‖ / ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ := hz1
_ ≤ ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ ^ 2 * T ^ 2 ^ n / ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ := by
gcongr
apply hz.2
_ = ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ * T ^ 2 ^ n := div_sq_cancel _ _
_ < ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ := (mul_lt_iff_lt_one_right (deriv_norm_pos hnorm)).2
(T_pow' hnorm _)
private def calc_eval_z' {z z' z1 : ℤ_[p]} (hz' : z' = z - z1) {n} (hz : ih n z)
(h1 : ‖(↑(F.eval z) : ℚ_[p]) / ↑(F.derivative.eval z)‖ ≤ 1) (hzeq : z1 = ⟨_, h1⟩) :
{ q : ℤ_[p] // F.eval z' = q * z1 ^ 2 } := by
have hdzne : F.derivative.eval z ≠ 0 :=
mt norm_eq_zero.2 (by rw [hz.1]; apply deriv_norm_ne_zero; assumption)
have hdzne' : (↑(F.derivative.eval z) : ℚ_[p]) ≠ 0 := fun h => hdzne (Subtype.ext_iff_val.2 h)
obtain ⟨q, hq⟩ := F.binomExpansion z (-z1)
have : ‖(↑(F.derivative.eval z) * (↑(F.eval z) / ↑(F.derivative.eval z)) : ℚ_[p])‖ ≤ 1 := by
rw [padicNormE.mul]
exact mul_le_one₀ (PadicInt.norm_le_one _) (norm_nonneg _) h1
have : F.derivative.eval z * -z1 = -F.eval z := by
calc
F.derivative.eval z * -z1 =
F.derivative.eval z * -⟨↑(F.eval z) / ↑(F.derivative.eval z), h1⟩ := by rw [hzeq]
_ = -(F.derivative.eval z * ⟨↑(F.eval z) / ↑(F.derivative.eval z), h1⟩) := mul_neg _ _
_ = -⟨F.derivative.eval z * (F.eval z / (F.derivative.eval z : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]), this⟩ :=
(Subtype.ext <| by simp only [PadicInt.coe_neg, PadicInt.coe_mul, Subtype.coe_mk])
_ = -F.eval z := by simp only [mul_div_cancel₀ _ hdzne', Subtype.coe_eta]
exact ⟨q, by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg, this, hz', add_neg_cancel, neg_sq, zero_add] using hq⟩
private def calc_eval_z'_norm {z z' z1 : ℤ_[p]} {n} (hz : ih n z) {q} (heq : F.eval z' = q * z1 ^ 2)
(h1 : ‖(↑(F.eval z) : ℚ_[p]) / ↑(F.derivative.eval z)‖ ≤ 1) (hzeq : z1 = ⟨_, h1⟩) :
‖F.eval z'‖ ≤ ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ ^ 2 * T ^ 2 ^ (n + 1) := by
calc
‖F.eval z'‖ = ‖q‖ * ‖z1‖ ^ 2 := by simp [heq]
_ ≤ 1 * ‖z1‖ ^ 2 := by gcongr; apply PadicInt.norm_le_one
_ = ‖F.eval z‖ ^ 2 / ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ ^ 2 := by simp [hzeq, hz.1, div_pow]
_ ≤ (‖F.derivative.eval a‖ ^ 2 * T ^ 2 ^ n) ^ 2 / ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ ^ 2 := by
gcongr
exact hz.2
_ = (‖F.derivative.eval a‖ ^ 2) ^ 2 * (T ^ 2 ^ n) ^ 2 / ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ ^ 2 := by
simp only [mul_pow]
_ = ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ ^ 2 * (T ^ 2 ^ n) ^ 2 := div_sq_cancel _ _
_ = ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ ^ 2 * T ^ 2 ^ (n + 1) := by rw [← pow_mul, pow_succ 2]
/-- Given `z : ℤ_[p]` satisfying `ih n z`, construct `z' : ℤ_[p]` satisfying `ih (n+1) z'`. We need
the hypothesis `ih n z`, since otherwise `z'` is not necessarily an integer. -/
private def ih_n {n : ℕ} {z : ℤ_[p]} (hz : ih n z) : { z' : ℤ_[p] // ih (n + 1) z' } :=
have h1 : ‖(↑(F.eval z) : ℚ_[p]) / ↑(F.derivative.eval z)‖ ≤ 1 := calc_norm_le_one hnorm hz
let z1 : ℤ_[p] := ⟨_, h1⟩
let z' : ℤ_[p] := z - z1
⟨z',
have hdist : ‖F.derivative.eval z' - F.derivative.eval z‖ < ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ :=
calc_deriv_dist hnorm rfl (by simp [z1, hz.1]) hz
have hfeq : ‖F.derivative.eval z'‖ = ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← hz.1, ← norm_neg (F.derivative.eval z)] at hdist
have := PadicInt.norm_eq_of_norm_add_lt_right hdist
rwa [norm_neg, hz.1] at this
let ⟨_, heq⟩ := calc_eval_z' hnorm rfl hz h1 rfl
have hnle : ‖F.eval z'‖ ≤ ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ ^ 2 * T ^ 2 ^ (n + 1) :=
calc_eval_z'_norm hz heq h1 rfl
⟨hfeq, hnle⟩⟩
private def newton_seq_aux : ∀ n : ℕ, { z : ℤ_[p] // ih n z }
| 0 => ⟨a, ih_0 hnorm⟩
| k + 1 => ih_n hnorm (newton_seq_aux k).2
private def newton_seq_gen (n : ℕ) : ℤ_[p] :=
(newton_seq_aux hnorm n).1
local notation "newton_seq" => newton_seq_gen hnorm
private theorem newton_seq_deriv_norm (n : ℕ) :
‖F.derivative.eval (newton_seq n)‖ = ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ :=
(newton_seq_aux hnorm n).2.1
private theorem newton_seq_norm_le (n : ℕ) :
‖F.eval (newton_seq n)‖ ≤ ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ ^ 2 * T ^ 2 ^ n :=
(newton_seq_aux hnorm n).2.2
private theorem newton_seq_norm_eq (n : ℕ) :
‖newton_seq (n + 1) - newton_seq n‖ =
‖F.eval (newton_seq n)‖ / ‖F.derivative.eval (newton_seq n)‖ := by
rw [newton_seq_gen, newton_seq_gen, newton_seq_aux, ih_n]
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm]
private theorem newton_seq_succ_dist (n : ℕ) :
‖newton_seq (n + 1) - newton_seq n‖ ≤ ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ * T ^ 2 ^ n :=
calc
‖newton_seq (n + 1) - newton_seq n‖ =
‖F.eval (newton_seq n)‖ / ‖F.derivative.eval (newton_seq n)‖ :=
newton_seq_norm_eq hnorm _
_ = ‖F.eval (newton_seq n)‖ / ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ := by rw [newton_seq_deriv_norm]
_ ≤ ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ ^ 2 * T ^ 2 ^ n / ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ :=
((div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right (deriv_norm_pos hnorm)).2 (newton_seq_norm_le hnorm _))
_ = ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ * T ^ 2 ^ n := div_sq_cancel _ _
private theorem newton_seq_dist_aux (n : ℕ) :
∀ k : ℕ, ‖newton_seq (n + k) - newton_seq n‖ ≤ ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ * T ^ 2 ^ n
| 0 => by simp [T_pow_nonneg, mul_nonneg]
| k + 1 =>
have : 2 ^ n ≤ 2 ^ (n + k) := by
apply pow_right_mono₀
· norm_num
· apply Nat.le_add_right
calc
‖newton_seq (n + (k + 1)) - newton_seq n‖ = ‖newton_seq (n + k + 1) - newton_seq n‖ := by
rw [add_assoc]
_ = ‖newton_seq (n + k + 1) - newton_seq (n + k) + (newton_seq (n + k) - newton_seq n)‖ := by
rw [← sub_add_sub_cancel]
_ ≤ max ‖newton_seq (n + k + 1) - newton_seq (n + k)‖ ‖newton_seq (n + k) - newton_seq n‖ :=
(PadicInt.nonarchimedean _ _)
_ ≤ max (‖F.derivative.eval a‖ * T ^ 2 ^ (n + k)) (‖F.derivative.eval a‖ * T ^ 2 ^ n) :=
(max_le_max (newton_seq_succ_dist _ _) (newton_seq_dist_aux _ _))
_ = ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ * T ^ 2 ^ n :=
max_eq_right <|
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (pow_le_pow_of_le_one (norm_nonneg _)
(le_of_lt (T_lt_one hnorm)) this) (norm_nonneg _)
private theorem newton_seq_dist {n k : ℕ} (hnk : n ≤ k) :
‖newton_seq k - newton_seq n‖ ≤ ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ * T ^ 2 ^ n := by
have hex : ∃ m, k = n + m := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le hnk
let ⟨_, hex'⟩ := hex
rw [hex']; apply newton_seq_dist_aux
private theorem bound' : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ * T ^ 2 ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
rw [← mul_zero ‖F.derivative.eval a‖]
exact
tendsto_const_nhds.mul
(Tendsto.comp (tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one (norm_nonneg _) (T_lt_one hnorm))
(Nat.tendsto_pow_atTop_atTop_of_one_lt (by norm_num)))
private theorem bound :
∀ {ε}, ε > 0 → ∃ N : ℕ, ∀ {n}, n ≥ N → ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ * T ^ 2 ^ n < ε := fun hε ↦
eventually_atTop.1 <| (bound' hnorm).eventually <| gt_mem_nhds hε
private theorem bound'_sq :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ ^ 2 * T ^ 2 ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
rw [← mul_zero ‖F.derivative.eval a‖, sq]
simp only [mul_assoc]
apply Tendsto.mul
· apply tendsto_const_nhds
· apply bound'
assumption
private theorem newton_seq_is_cauchy : IsCauSeq norm newton_seq := fun _ε hε ↦
(bound hnorm hε).imp fun _N hN _j hj ↦ (newton_seq_dist hnorm hj).trans_lt <| hN le_rfl
private def newton_cau_seq : CauSeq ℤ_[p] norm := ⟨_, newton_seq_is_cauchy hnorm⟩
private def soln_gen : ℤ_[p] := (newton_cau_seq hnorm).lim
local notation "soln" => soln_gen hnorm
private theorem soln_spec {ε : ℝ} (hε : ε > 0) :
∃ N : ℕ, ∀ {i : ℕ}, i ≥ N → ‖soln - newton_cau_seq hnorm i‖ < ε :=
Setoid.symm (CauSeq.equiv_lim (newton_cau_seq hnorm)) _ hε
private theorem soln_deriv_norm : ‖F.derivative.eval soln‖ = ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ :=
norm_deriv_eq (newton_seq_deriv_norm hnorm)
private theorem newton_seq_norm_tendsto_zero :
Tendsto (fun i => ‖F.eval (newton_cau_seq hnorm i)‖) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
squeeze_zero (fun _ => norm_nonneg _) (newton_seq_norm_le hnorm) (bound'_sq hnorm)
private theorem newton_seq_dist_tendsto' :
Tendsto (fun n => ‖newton_cau_seq hnorm n - a‖) atTop (𝓝 ‖soln - a‖) :=
(continuous_norm.tendsto _).comp ((newton_cau_seq hnorm).tendsto_limit.sub tendsto_const_nhds)
private theorem eval_soln : F.eval soln = 0 :=
limit_zero_of_norm_tendsto_zero (newton_seq_norm_tendsto_zero hnorm)
variable (hnsol : F.eval a ≠ 0)
include hnsol
private theorem T_pos : T > 0 := by
rw [T_def]
exact div_pos (norm_pos_iff.2 hnsol) (deriv_sq_norm_pos hnorm)
private theorem newton_seq_succ_dist_weak (n : ℕ) :
‖newton_seq (n + 2) - newton_seq (n + 1)‖ < ‖F.eval a‖ / ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ :=
have : 2 ≤ 2 ^ (n + 1) := by
have := pow_right_mono₀ (by norm_num : 1 ≤ 2) (Nat.le_add_left _ _ : 1 ≤ n + 1)
simpa using this
calc
‖newton_seq (n + 2) - newton_seq (n + 1)‖ ≤ ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ * T ^ 2 ^ (n + 1) :=
newton_seq_succ_dist hnorm _
_ ≤ ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ * T ^ 2 :=
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (pow_le_pow_of_le_one (norm_nonneg _)
(le_of_lt (T_lt_one hnorm)) this) (norm_nonneg _))
_ < ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ * T ^ 1 :=
(mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left (pow_lt_pow_right_of_lt_one₀ (T_pos hnorm hnsol)
(T_lt_one hnorm) (by norm_num)) (deriv_norm_pos hnorm))
_ = ‖F.eval a‖ / ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ := by
rw [T_gen, sq, pow_one, norm_div, ← mul_div_assoc, PadicInt.padic_norm_e_of_padicInt,
PadicInt.coe_mul, padicNormE.mul]
apply mul_div_mul_left
apply deriv_norm_ne_zero; assumption
private theorem newton_seq_dist_to_a :
∀ n : ℕ, 0 < n → ‖newton_seq n - a‖ = ‖F.eval a‖ / ‖F.derivative.eval a‖
| 1, _h => by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc, newton_seq_gen, newton_seq_aux, ih_n]
| k + 2, _h =>
have hlt : ‖newton_seq (k + 2) - newton_seq (k + 1)‖ < ‖newton_seq (k + 1) - a‖ := by
rw [newton_seq_dist_to_a (k + 1) (succ_pos _)]; apply newton_seq_succ_dist_weak
assumption
have hne' : ‖newton_seq (k + 2) - newton_seq (k + 1)‖ ≠ ‖newton_seq (k + 1) - a‖ := ne_of_lt hlt
calc
‖newton_seq (k + 2) - a‖ =
‖newton_seq (k + 2) - newton_seq (k + 1) + (newton_seq (k + 1) - a)‖ := by
rw [← sub_add_sub_cancel]
_ = max ‖newton_seq (k + 2) - newton_seq (k + 1)‖ ‖newton_seq (k + 1) - a‖ :=
(PadicInt.norm_add_eq_max_of_ne hne')
_ = ‖newton_seq (k + 1) - a‖ := max_eq_right_of_lt hlt
_ = ‖Polynomial.eval a F‖ / ‖Polynomial.eval a (Polynomial.derivative F)‖ :=
newton_seq_dist_to_a (k + 1) (succ_pos _)
private theorem newton_seq_dist_tendsto :
Tendsto (fun n => ‖newton_cau_seq hnorm n - a‖)
atTop (𝓝 (‖F.eval a‖ / ‖F.derivative.eval a‖)) :=
tendsto_const_nhds.congr' (eventually_atTop.2
⟨1, fun _ hx => (newton_seq_dist_to_a hnorm hnsol _ hx).symm⟩)
private theorem soln_dist_to_a : ‖soln - a‖ = ‖F.eval a‖ / ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ :=
tendsto_nhds_unique (newton_seq_dist_tendsto' hnorm) (newton_seq_dist_tendsto hnorm hnsol)
private theorem soln_dist_to_a_lt_deriv : ‖soln - a‖ < ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ := by
rw [soln_dist_to_a, div_lt_iff₀ (deriv_norm_pos _), ← sq] <;> assumption
private theorem soln_unique (z : ℤ_[p]) (hev : F.eval z = 0)
(hnlt : ‖z - a‖ < ‖F.derivative.eval a‖) : z = soln :=
have soln_dist : ‖z - soln‖ < ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ :=
calc
‖z - soln‖ = ‖z - a + (a - soln)‖ := by rw [sub_add_sub_cancel]
_ ≤ max ‖z - a‖ ‖a - soln‖ := PadicInt.nonarchimedean _ _
_ < ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ :=
max_lt hnlt ((norm_sub_rev soln a ▸ (soln_dist_to_a_lt_deriv hnorm)) hnsol)
let h := z - soln
let ⟨q, hq⟩ := F.binomExpansion soln h
have : (F.derivative.eval soln + q * h) * h = 0 :=
Eq.symm
(calc
0 = F.eval (soln + h) := by simp [h, hev]
_ = F.derivative.eval soln * h + q * h ^ 2 := by rw [hq, eval_soln, zero_add]
_ = (F.derivative.eval soln + q * h) * h := by rw [sq, right_distrib, mul_assoc]
)
have : h = 0 :=
by_contra fun hne =>
have : F.derivative.eval soln + q * h = 0 :=
(eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero this).resolve_right hne
have : F.derivative.eval soln = -q * h := by simpa using eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_left this
lt_irrefl ‖F.derivative.eval soln‖
(calc
‖F.derivative.eval soln‖ = ‖-q * h‖ := by rw [this]
_ ≤ 1 * ‖h‖ := by
rw [norm_mul]
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (PadicInt.norm_le_one _) (norm_nonneg _)
_ = ‖z - soln‖ := by simp [h]
_ < ‖F.derivative.eval soln‖ := by rw [soln_deriv_norm]; apply soln_dist
)
eq_of_sub_eq_zero (by rw [← this])
end Hensel
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] {F : Polynomial ℤ_[p]} {a : ℤ_[p]}
private theorem a_soln_is_unique (ha : F.eval a = 0) (z' : ℤ_[p]) (hz' : F.eval z' = 0)
(hnormz' : ‖z' - a‖ < ‖F.derivative.eval a‖) : z' = a :=
let h := z' - a
let ⟨q, hq⟩ := F.binomExpansion a h
have : (F.derivative.eval a + q * h) * h = 0 :=
Eq.symm
(calc
0 = F.eval (a + h) := show 0 = F.eval (a + (z' - a)) by rw [add_comm]; simp [hz']
_ = F.derivative.eval a * h + q * h ^ 2 := by rw [hq, ha, zero_add]
_ = (F.derivative.eval a + q * h) * h := by rw [sq, right_distrib, mul_assoc]
)
have : h = 0 :=
by_contra fun hne =>
have : F.derivative.eval a + q * h = 0 :=
(eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero this).resolve_right hne
have : F.derivative.eval a = -q * h := by simpa using eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_left this
lt_irrefl ‖F.derivative.eval a‖
(calc
‖F.derivative.eval a‖ = ‖q‖ * ‖h‖ := by simp [this]
_ ≤ 1 * ‖h‖ := by gcongr; apply PadicInt.norm_le_one
_ < ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ := by simpa
)
eq_of_sub_eq_zero (by rw [← this])
variable (hnorm : ‖F.eval a‖ < ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ ^ 2)
include hnorm
private theorem a_is_soln (ha : F.eval a = 0) :
F.eval a = 0 ∧
‖a - a‖ < ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ ∧
‖F.derivative.eval a‖ = ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ ∧
∀ z', F.eval z' = 0 → ‖z' - a‖ < ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ → z' = a :=
⟨ha, by simp [deriv_ne_zero hnorm], rfl, a_soln_is_unique ha⟩
theorem hensels_lemma :
∃ z : ℤ_[p],
F.eval z = 0 ∧
‖z - a‖ < ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ ∧
‖F.derivative.eval z‖ = ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ ∧
∀ z', F.eval z' = 0 → ‖z' - a‖ < ‖F.derivative.eval a‖ → z' = z := by
classical
exact if ha : F.eval a = 0 then ⟨a, a_is_soln hnorm ha⟩
else by
exact ⟨soln_gen hnorm, eval_soln hnorm,
| soln_dist_to_a_lt_deriv hnorm ha, soln_deriv_norm hnorm, fun z => soln_unique hnorm ha z⟩
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Padics/Hensel.lean | 477 | 486 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.WithTop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
import Mathlib.Tactic.FastInstance
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
This file defines `Polynomial R`, the type of univariate polynomials over the semiring `R`, builds
a semiring structure on it, and gives basic definitions that are expanded in other files in this
directory.
## Main definitions
* `monomial n a` is the polynomial `a X^n`. Note that `monomial n` is defined as an `R`-linear map.
* `C a` is the constant polynomial `a`. Note that `C` is defined as a ring homomorphism.
* `X` is the polynomial `X`, i.e., `monomial 1 1`.
* `p.sum f` is `∑ n ∈ p.support, f n (p.coeff n)`, i.e., one sums the values of functions applied
to coefficients of the polynomial `p`.
* `p.erase n` is the polynomial `p` in which one removes the `c X^n` term.
There are often two natural variants of lemmas involving sums, depending on whether one acts on the
polynomials, or on the function. The naming convention is that one adds `index` when acting on
the polynomials. For instance,
* `sum_add_index` states that `(p + q).sum f = p.sum f + q.sum f`;
* `sum_add` states that `p.sum (fun n x ↦ f n x + g n x) = p.sum f + p.sum g`.
* Notation to refer to `Polynomial R`, as `R[X]` or `R[t]`.
## Implementation
Polynomials are defined using `R[ℕ]`, where `R` is a semiring.
The variable `X` commutes with every polynomial `p`: lemma `X_mul` proves the identity
`X * p = p * X`. The relationship to `R[ℕ]` is through a structure
to make polynomials irreducible from the point of view of the kernel. Most operations
are irreducible since Lean can not compute anyway with `AddMonoidAlgebra`. There are two
exceptions that we make semireducible:
* The zero polynomial, so that its coefficients are definitionally equal to `0`.
* The scalar action, to permit typeclass search to unfold it to resolve potential instance
diamonds.
The raw implementation of the equivalence between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]` is
done through `ofFinsupp` and `toFinsupp` (or, equivalently, `rcases p` when `p` is a polynomial
gives an element `q` of `R[ℕ]`, and conversely `⟨q⟩` gives back `p`). The
equivalence is also registered as a ring equiv in `Polynomial.toFinsuppIso`. These should
in general not be used once the basic API for polynomials is constructed.
-/
noncomputable section
/-- `Polynomial R` is the type of univariate polynomials over `R`,
denoted as `R[X]` within the `Polynomial` namespace.
Polynomials should be seen as (semi-)rings with the additional constructor `X`.
The embedding from `R` is called `C`. -/
structure Polynomial (R : Type*) [Semiring R] where ofFinsupp ::
toFinsupp : AddMonoidAlgebra R ℕ
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Polynomial] notation:9000 R "[X]" => Polynomial R
open AddMonoidAlgebra Finset
open Finsupp hiding single
open Function hiding Commute
namespace Polynomial
universe u
variable {R : Type u} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem forall_iff_forall_finsupp (P : R[X] → Prop) :
(∀ p, P p) ↔ ∀ q : R[ℕ], P ⟨q⟩ :=
⟨fun h q => h ⟨q⟩, fun h ⟨p⟩ => h p⟩
theorem exists_iff_exists_finsupp (P : R[X] → Prop) :
(∃ p, P p) ↔ ∃ q : R[ℕ], P ⟨q⟩ :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨p⟩, hp⟩ => ⟨p, hp⟩, fun ⟨q, hq⟩ => ⟨⟨q⟩, hq⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem eta (f : R[X]) : Polynomial.ofFinsupp f.toFinsupp = f := by cases f; rfl
/-! ### Conversions to and from `AddMonoidAlgebra`
Since `R[X]` is not defeq to `R[ℕ]`, but instead is a structure wrapping
it, we have to copy across all the arithmetic operators manually, along with the lemmas about how
they unfold around `Polynomial.ofFinsupp` and `Polynomial.toFinsupp`.
-/
section AddMonoidAlgebra
private irreducible_def add : R[X] → R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a + b⟩
private irreducible_def neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] : R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨-a⟩
private irreducible_def mul : R[X] → R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a * b⟩
instance zero : Zero R[X] :=
⟨⟨0⟩⟩
instance one : One R[X] :=
⟨⟨1⟩⟩
instance add' : Add R[X] :=
⟨add⟩
instance neg' {R : Type u} [Ring R] : Neg R[X] :=
⟨neg⟩
instance sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] : Sub R[X] :=
⟨fun a b => a + -b⟩
instance mul' : Mul R[X] :=
⟨mul⟩
-- If the private definitions are accidentally exposed, simplify them away.
@[simp] theorem add_eq_add : add p q = p + q := rfl
@[simp] theorem mul_eq_mul : mul p q = p * q := rfl
instance instNSMul : SMul ℕ R[X] where
smul r p := ⟨r • p.toFinsupp⟩
instance smulZeroClass {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] : SMulZeroClass S R[X] where
smul r p := ⟨r • p.toFinsupp⟩
smul_zero a := congr_arg ofFinsupp (smul_zero a)
instance {S : Type*} [Zero S] [SMulZeroClass S R] [NoZeroSMulDivisors S R] :
NoZeroSMulDivisors S R[X] where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero eq :=
(eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero <| congr_arg toFinsupp eq).imp id (congr_arg ofFinsupp)
-- to avoid a bug in the `ring` tactic
instance (priority := 1) pow : Pow R[X] ℕ where pow p n := npowRec n p
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_zero : (⟨0⟩ : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_one : (⟨1⟩ : R[X]) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_add {a b} : (⟨a + b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ + ⟨b⟩ :=
show _ = add _ _ by rw [add_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] {a} : (⟨-a⟩ : R[X]) = -⟨a⟩ :=
show _ = neg _ by rw [neg_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] {a b} : (⟨a - b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ - ⟨b⟩ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ofFinsupp_add, ofFinsupp_neg]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_mul (a b) : (⟨a * b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ * ⟨b⟩ :=
show _ = mul _ _ by rw [mul_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_nsmul (a : ℕ) (b) :
(⟨a • b⟩ : R[X]) = (a • ⟨b⟩ : R[X]) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_smul {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (b) :
(⟨a • b⟩ : R[X]) = (a • ⟨b⟩ : R[X]) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_pow (a) (n : ℕ) : (⟨a ^ n⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ ^ n := by
change _ = npowRec n _
induction n with
| zero => simp [npowRec]
| succ n n_ih => simp [npowRec, n_ih, pow_succ]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_zero : (0 : R[X]).toFinsupp = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_one : (1 : R[X]).toFinsupp = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_add (a b : R[X]) : (a + b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp + b.toFinsupp := by
cases a
cases b
rw [← ofFinsupp_add]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] (a : R[X]) : (-a).toFinsupp = -a.toFinsupp := by
cases a
rw [← ofFinsupp_neg]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] (a b : R[X]) :
(a - b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp - b.toFinsupp := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← toFinsupp_neg, ← toFinsupp_add]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_mul (a b : R[X]) : (a * b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp * b.toFinsupp := by
cases a
cases b
rw [← ofFinsupp_mul]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_nsmul (a : ℕ) (b : R[X]) :
(a • b).toFinsupp = a • b.toFinsupp :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_smul {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (b : R[X]) :
(a • b).toFinsupp = a • b.toFinsupp :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_pow (a : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : (a ^ n).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp ^ n := by
cases a
rw [← ofFinsupp_pow]
theorem _root_.IsSMulRegular.polynomial {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] {a : S}
(ha : IsSMulRegular R a) : IsSMulRegular R[X] a
| ⟨_x⟩, ⟨_y⟩, h => congr_arg _ <| ha.finsupp (Polynomial.ofFinsupp.inj h)
theorem toFinsupp_injective : Function.Injective (toFinsupp : R[X] → AddMonoidAlgebra _ _) :=
fun ⟨_x⟩ ⟨_y⟩ => congr_arg _
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_inj {a b : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = b.toFinsupp ↔ a = b :=
toFinsupp_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_eq_zero {a : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_zero, toFinsupp_inj]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_eq_one {a : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_one, toFinsupp_inj]
/-- A more convenient spelling of `Polynomial.ofFinsupp.injEq` in terms of `Iff`. -/
theorem ofFinsupp_inj {a b} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨b⟩ ↔ a = b :=
iff_of_eq (ofFinsupp.injEq _ _)
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_eq_zero {a} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← ofFinsupp_zero, ofFinsupp_inj]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_eq_one {a} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by rw [← ofFinsupp_one, ofFinsupp_inj]
instance inhabited : Inhabited R[X] :=
⟨0⟩
instance instNatCast : NatCast R[X] where natCast n := ofFinsupp n
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_natCast (n : ℕ) : (⟨n⟩ : R[X]) = n := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_natCast (n : ℕ) : (n : R[X]).toFinsupp = n := rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (⟨ofNat(n)⟩ : R[X]) = ofNat(n) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : R[X]).toFinsupp = ofNat(n) := rfl
instance semiring : Semiring R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.semiring toFinsupp toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_zero
toFinsupp_one toFinsupp_add toFinsupp_mul (fun _ _ => toFinsupp_nsmul _ _) toFinsupp_pow
fun _ => rfl
instance distribSMul {S} [DistribSMul S R] : DistribSMul S R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.distribSMul ⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩
toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul
instance distribMulAction {S} [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] : DistribMulAction S R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.distribMulAction
⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero (R := R)⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩ toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul
instance faithfulSMul {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] [FaithfulSMul S R] : FaithfulSMul S R[X] where
eq_of_smul_eq_smul {_s₁ _s₂} h :=
eq_of_smul_eq_smul fun a : ℕ →₀ R => congr_arg toFinsupp (h ⟨a⟩)
instance module {S} [Semiring S] [Module S R] : Module S R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.module _ ⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩
toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul
instance smulCommClass {S₁ S₂} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] [SMulZeroClass S₂ R] [SMulCommClass S₁ S₂ R] :
SMulCommClass S₁ S₂ R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro m n ⟨f⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_comm m n f]⟩
instance isScalarTower {S₁ S₂} [SMul S₁ S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] [SMulZeroClass S₂ R]
[IsScalarTower S₁ S₂ R] : IsScalarTower S₁ S₂ R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ _ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_assoc]⟩
instance isScalarTower_right {α K : Type*} [Semiring K] [DistribSMul α K] [IsScalarTower α K K] :
IsScalarTower α K[X] K[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [smul_eq_mul, ← ofFinsupp_smul, ← ofFinsupp_mul, ← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_mul_assoc]⟩
instance isCentralScalar {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] [SMulZeroClass Sᵐᵒᵖ R] [IsCentralScalar S R] :
IsCentralScalar S R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, op_smul_eq_smul]⟩
instance unique [Subsingleton R] : Unique R[X] :=
{ Polynomial.inhabited with
uniq := by
rintro ⟨x⟩
apply congr_arg ofFinsupp
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton] }
variable (R)
/-- Ring isomorphism between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]`. This is just an
implementation detail, but it can be useful to transfer results from `Finsupp` to polynomials. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def toFinsuppIso : R[X] ≃+* R[ℕ] where
toFun := toFinsupp
invFun := ofFinsupp
left_inv := fun ⟨_p⟩ => rfl
right_inv _p := rfl
map_mul' := toFinsupp_mul
map_add' := toFinsupp_add
instance [DecidableEq R] : DecidableEq R[X] :=
@Equiv.decidableEq R[X] _ (toFinsuppIso R).toEquiv (Finsupp.instDecidableEq)
/-- Linear isomorphism between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]`. This is just an
implementation detail, but it can be useful to transfer results from `Finsupp` to polynomials. -/
@[simps!]
def toFinsuppIsoLinear : R[X] ≃ₗ[R] R[ℕ] where
__ := toFinsuppIso R
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
end AddMonoidAlgebra
theorem ofFinsupp_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[ℕ]) :
(⟨∑ i ∈ s, f i⟩ : R[X]) = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟨f i⟩ :=
map_sum (toFinsuppIso R).symm f s
theorem toFinsupp_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i : R[X]).toFinsupp = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i).toFinsupp :=
map_sum (toFinsuppIso R) f s
/-- The set of all `n` such that `X^n` has a non-zero coefficient. -/
def support : R[X] → Finset ℕ
| ⟨p⟩ => p.support
@[simp]
theorem support_ofFinsupp (p) : support (⟨p⟩ : R[X]) = p.support := by rw [support]
theorem support_toFinsupp (p : R[X]) : p.toFinsupp.support = p.support := by rw [support]
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : (0 : R[X]).support = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty : p.support = ∅ ↔ p = 0 := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp [support]
@[simp] lemma support_nonempty : p.support.Nonempty ↔ p ≠ 0 :=
Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty.trans support_eq_empty.not
theorem card_support_eq_zero : #p.support = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by simp
/-- `monomial s a` is the monomial `a * X^s` -/
def monomial (n : ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] R[X] where
toFun t := ⟨Finsupp.single n t⟩
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10745): was `simp`.
map_add' x y := by simp; rw [ofFinsupp_add]
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10745): was `simp [← ofFinsupp_smul]`.
map_smul' r x := by simp; rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_single']
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_monomial (n : ℕ) (r : R) : (monomial n r).toFinsupp = Finsupp.single n r := by
simp [monomial]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_single (n : ℕ) (r : R) : (⟨Finsupp.single n r⟩ : R[X]) = monomial n r := by
simp [monomial]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero_right (n : ℕ) : monomial n (0 : R) = 0 :=
(monomial n).map_zero
-- This is not a `simp` lemma as `monomial_zero_left` is more general.
theorem monomial_zero_one : monomial 0 (1 : R) = 1 :=
rfl
-- TODO: can't we just delete this one?
theorem monomial_add (n : ℕ) (r s : R) : monomial n (r + s) = monomial n r + monomial n s :=
(monomial n).map_add _ _
theorem monomial_mul_monomial (n m : ℕ) (r s : R) :
monomial n r * monomial m s = monomial (n + m) (r * s) :=
toFinsupp_injective <| by
simp only [toFinsupp_monomial, toFinsupp_mul, AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_single]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_pow (n : ℕ) (r : R) (k : ℕ) : monomial n r ^ k = monomial (n * k) (r ^ k) := by
induction k with
| zero => simp [pow_zero, monomial_zero_one]
| succ k ih => simp [pow_succ, ih, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_add, add_comm]
theorem smul_monomial {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (n : ℕ) (b : R) :
a • monomial n b = monomial n (a • b) :=
toFinsupp_injective <| AddMonoidAlgebra.smul_single _ _ _
theorem monomial_injective (n : ℕ) : Function.Injective (monomial n : R → R[X]) :=
(toFinsuppIso R).symm.injective.comp (single_injective n)
@[simp]
theorem monomial_eq_zero_iff (t : R) (n : ℕ) : monomial n t = 0 ↔ t = 0 :=
LinearMap.map_eq_zero_iff _ (Polynomial.monomial_injective n)
theorem monomial_eq_monomial_iff {m n : ℕ} {a b : R} :
monomial m a = monomial n b ↔ m = n ∧ a = b ∨ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_inj, toFinsupp_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial, Finsupp.single_eq_single_iff]
theorem support_add : (p + q).support ⊆ p.support ∪ q.support := by
simpa [support] using Finsupp.support_add
/-- `C a` is the constant polynomial `a`.
`C` is provided as a ring homomorphism.
-/
def C : R →+* R[X] :=
{ monomial 0 with
map_one' := by simp [monomial_zero_one]
map_mul' := by simp [monomial_mul_monomial]
map_zero' := by simp }
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero_left (a : R) : monomial 0 a = C a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_C (a : R) : (C a).toFinsupp = single 0 a :=
rfl
theorem C_0 : C (0 : R) = 0 := by simp
theorem C_1 : C (1 : R) = 1 :=
rfl
theorem C_mul : C (a * b) = C a * C b :=
C.map_mul a b
theorem C_add : C (a + b) = C a + C b :=
C.map_add a b
@[simp]
theorem smul_C {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] (s : S) (r : R) : s • C r = C (s • r) :=
smul_monomial _ _ r
theorem C_pow : C (a ^ n) = C a ^ n :=
C.map_pow a n
theorem C_eq_natCast (n : ℕ) : C (n : R) = (n : R[X]) :=
map_natCast C n
@[simp]
theorem C_mul_monomial : C a * monomial n b = monomial n (a * b) := by
simp only [← monomial_zero_left, monomial_mul_monomial, zero_add]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_C : monomial n a * C b = monomial n (a * b) := by
simp only [← monomial_zero_left, monomial_mul_monomial, add_zero]
/-- `X` is the polynomial variable (aka indeterminate). -/
def X : R[X] :=
monomial 1 1
theorem monomial_one_one_eq_X : monomial 1 (1 : R) = X :=
rfl
theorem monomial_one_right_eq_X_pow (n : ℕ) : monomial n (1 : R) = X ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp [monomial_zero_one]
| succ n ih => rw [pow_succ, ← ih, ← monomial_one_one_eq_X, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_X : X.toFinsupp = Finsupp.single 1 (1 : R) :=
rfl
theorem X_ne_C [Nontrivial R] (a : R) : X ≠ C a := by
intro he
simpa using monomial_eq_monomial_iff.1 he
/-- `X` commutes with everything, even when the coefficients are noncommutative. -/
theorem X_mul : X * p = p * X := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp only [X, ← ofFinsupp_single, ← ofFinsupp_mul, LinearMap.coe_mk, ofFinsupp.injEq]
ext
simp [AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_apply, AddMonoidAlgebra.sum_single_index, add_comm]
theorem X_pow_mul {n : ℕ} : X ^ n * p = p * X ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
conv_lhs => rw [pow_succ]
rw [mul_assoc, X_mul, ← mul_assoc, ih, mul_assoc, ← pow_succ]
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `Polynomial.X_mul`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_mul_C (r : R) : X * C r = C r * X :=
X_mul
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X ^ n`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `X_pow_mul`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_C (r : R) (n : ℕ) : X ^ n * C r = C r * X ^ n :=
X_pow_mul
theorem X_pow_mul_assoc {n : ℕ} : p * X ^ n * q = p * q * X ^ n := by
rw [mul_assoc, X_pow_mul, ← mul_assoc]
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X ^ n`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `X_pow_mul_assoc`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_assoc_C {n : ℕ} (r : R) : p * X ^ n * C r = p * C r * X ^ n :=
X_pow_mul_assoc
theorem commute_X (p : R[X]) : Commute X p :=
X_mul
theorem commute_X_pow (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : Commute (X ^ n) p :=
X_pow_mul
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_X (n : ℕ) (r : R) : monomial n r * X = monomial (n + 1) r := by
rw [X, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (r : R) (k : ℕ) :
monomial n r * X ^ k = monomial (n + k) r := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih => simp [ih, pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, add_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem X_mul_monomial (n : ℕ) (r : R) : X * monomial n r = monomial (n + 1) r := by
rw [X_mul, monomial_mul_X]
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_monomial (k n : ℕ) (r : R) : X ^ k * monomial n r = monomial (n + k) r := by
rw [X_pow_mul, monomial_mul_X_pow]
/-- `coeff p n` (often denoted `p.coeff n`) is the coefficient of `X^n` in `p`. -/
def coeff : R[X] → ℕ → R
| ⟨p⟩ => p
@[simp]
theorem coeff_ofFinsupp (p) : coeff (⟨p⟩ : R[X]) = p := by rw [coeff]
theorem coeff_injective : Injective (coeff : R[X] → ℕ → R) := by
rintro ⟨p⟩ ⟨q⟩
simp only [coeff, DFunLike.coe_fn_eq, imp_self, ofFinsupp.injEq]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_inj : p.coeff = q.coeff ↔ p = q :=
coeff_injective.eq_iff
theorem toFinsupp_apply (f : R[X]) (i) : f.toFinsupp i = f.coeff i := by cases f; rfl
theorem coeff_monomial : coeff (monomial n a) m = if n = m then a else 0 := by
simp [coeff, Finsupp.single_apply]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_same (n : ℕ) (c : R) : (monomial n c).coeff n = c :=
Finsupp.single_eq_same
theorem coeff_monomial_of_ne {m n : ℕ} (c : R) (h : n ≠ m) : (monomial n c).coeff m = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_eq_of_ne h
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero (n : ℕ) : coeff (0 : R[X]) n = 0 :=
rfl
theorem coeff_one {n : ℕ} : coeff (1 : R[X]) n = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 := by
simp_rw [eq_comm (a := n) (b := 0)]
exact coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_one_zero : coeff (1 : R[X]) 0 = 1 := by
simp [coeff_one]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_one : coeff (X : R[X]) 1 = 1 :=
coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_zero : coeff (X : R[X]) 0 = 0 :=
coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_succ : coeff (monomial (n + 1) a) 0 = 0 := by simp [coeff_monomial]
theorem coeff_X : coeff (X : R[X]) n = if 1 = n then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_monomial
theorem coeff_X_of_ne_one {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 1) : coeff (X : R[X]) n = 0 := by
rw [coeff_X, if_neg hn.symm]
@[simp]
theorem mem_support_iff : n ∈ p.support ↔ p.coeff n ≠ 0 := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp
theorem not_mem_support_iff : n ∉ p.support ↔ p.coeff n = 0 := by simp
theorem coeff_C : coeff (C a) n = ite (n = 0) a 0 := by
convert coeff_monomial (a := a) (m := n) (n := 0) using 2
simp [eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C_zero : coeff (C a) 0 = a :=
coeff_monomial
theorem coeff_C_ne_zero (h : n ≠ 0) : (C a).coeff n = 0 := by rw [coeff_C, if_neg h]
@[simp]
lemma coeff_C_succ {r : R} {n : ℕ} : coeff (C r) (n + 1) = 0 := by simp [coeff_C]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_natCast_ite : (Nat.cast m : R[X]).coeff n = ite (n = 0) m 0 := by
simp only [← C_eq_natCast, coeff_C, Nat.cast_ite, Nat.cast_zero]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_ofNat_zero (a : ℕ) [a.AtLeastTwo] :
coeff (ofNat(a) : R[X]) 0 = ofNat(a) :=
coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_ofNat_succ (a n : ℕ) [h : a.AtLeastTwo] :
coeff (ofNat(a) : R[X]) (n + 1) = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_ofNat]
simp [-Nat.cast_ofNat]
theorem C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial : ∀ {n : ℕ}, C a * X ^ n = monomial n a
| 0 => mul_one _
| n + 1 => by
rw [pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, X, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
@[simp high]
theorem toFinsupp_C_mul_X_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) :
Polynomial.toFinsupp (C a * X ^ n) = Finsupp.single n a := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial]
theorem C_mul_X_eq_monomial : C a * X = monomial 1 a := by rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, pow_one]
@[simp high]
theorem toFinsupp_C_mul_X (a : R) : Polynomial.toFinsupp (C a * X) = Finsupp.single 1 a := by
rw [C_mul_X_eq_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial]
theorem C_injective : Injective (C : R → R[X]) :=
monomial_injective 0
@[simp]
theorem C_inj : C a = C b ↔ a = b :=
C_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem C_eq_zero : C a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
C_injective.eq_iff' (map_zero C)
theorem C_ne_zero : C a ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
C_eq_zero.not
theorem subsingleton_iff_subsingleton : Subsingleton R[X] ↔ Subsingleton R :=
⟨@Injective.subsingleton _ _ _ C_injective, by
intro
infer_instance⟩
theorem Nontrivial.of_polynomial_ne (h : p ≠ q) : Nontrivial R :=
(subsingleton_or_nontrivial R).resolve_left fun _hI => h <| Subsingleton.elim _ _
theorem forall_eq_iff_forall_eq : (∀ f g : R[X], f = g) ↔ ∀ a b : R, a = b := by
simpa only [← subsingleton_iff] using subsingleton_iff_subsingleton
theorem ext_iff {p q : R[X]} : p = q ↔ ∀ n, coeff p n = coeff q n := by
rcases p with ⟨f : ℕ →₀ R⟩
rcases q with ⟨g : ℕ →₀ R⟩
simpa [coeff] using DFunLike.ext_iff (f := f) (g := g)
@[ext]
theorem ext {p q : R[X]} : (∀ n, coeff p n = coeff q n) → p = q :=
ext_iff.2
/-- Monomials generate the additive monoid of polynomials. -/
theorem addSubmonoid_closure_setOf_eq_monomial :
AddSubmonoid.closure { p : R[X] | ∃ n a, p = monomial n a } = ⊤ := by
apply top_unique
rw [← AddSubmonoid.map_equiv_top (toFinsuppIso R).symm.toAddEquiv, ←
Finsupp.add_closure_setOf_eq_single, AddMonoidHom.map_mclosure]
refine AddSubmonoid.closure_mono (Set.image_subset_iff.2 ?_)
rintro _ ⟨n, a, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n, a, Polynomial.ofFinsupp_single _ _⟩
theorem addHom_ext {M : Type*} [AddZeroClass M] {f g : R[X] →+ M}
(h : ∀ n a, f (monomial n a) = g (monomial n a)) : f = g :=
AddMonoidHom.eq_of_eqOn_denseM addSubmonoid_closure_setOf_eq_monomial <| by
rintro p ⟨n, a, rfl⟩
exact h n a
@[ext high]
theorem addHom_ext' {M : Type*} [AddZeroClass M] {f g : R[X] →+ M}
(h : ∀ n, f.comp (monomial n).toAddMonoidHom = g.comp (monomial n).toAddMonoidHom) : f = g :=
addHom_ext fun n => DFunLike.congr_fun (h n)
@[ext high]
theorem lhom_ext' {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] {f g : R[X] →ₗ[R] M}
(h : ∀ n, f.comp (monomial n) = g.comp (monomial n)) : f = g :=
LinearMap.toAddMonoidHom_injective <| addHom_ext fun n => LinearMap.congr_fun (h n)
-- this has the same content as the subsingleton
theorem eq_zero_of_eq_zero (h : (0 : R) = (1 : R)) (p : R[X]) : p = 0 := by
rw [← one_smul R p, ← h, zero_smul]
section Fewnomials
theorem support_monomial (n) {a : R} (H : a ≠ 0) : (monomial n a).support = singleton n := by
rw [← ofFinsupp_single, support]; exact Finsupp.support_single_ne_zero _ H
theorem support_monomial' (n) (a : R) : (monomial n a).support ⊆ singleton n := by
rw [← ofFinsupp_single, support]
exact Finsupp.support_single_subset
theorem support_C {a : R} (h : a ≠ 0) : (C a).support = singleton 0 :=
support_monomial 0 h
theorem support_C_subset (a : R) : (C a).support ⊆ singleton 0 :=
support_monomial' 0 a
theorem support_C_mul_X {c : R} (h : c ≠ 0) : Polynomial.support (C c * X) = singleton 1 := by
rw [C_mul_X_eq_monomial, support_monomial 1 h]
theorem support_C_mul_X' (c : R) : Polynomial.support (C c * X) ⊆ singleton 1 := by
simpa only [C_mul_X_eq_monomial] using support_monomial' 1 c
theorem support_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) {c : R} (h : c ≠ 0) :
Polynomial.support (C c * X ^ n) = singleton n := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, support_monomial n h]
theorem support_C_mul_X_pow' (n : ℕ) (c : R) : Polynomial.support (C c * X ^ n) ⊆ singleton n := by
simpa only [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial] using support_monomial' n c
open Finset
theorem support_binomial' (k m : ℕ) (x y : R) :
Polynomial.support (C x * X ^ k + C y * X ^ m) ⊆ {k, m} :=
support_add.trans
(union_subset
((support_C_mul_X_pow' k x).trans (singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_self k {m})))
((support_C_mul_X_pow' m y).trans
(singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_singleton_self m)))))
theorem support_trinomial' (k m n : ℕ) (x y z : R) :
Polynomial.support (C x * X ^ k + C y * X ^ m + C z * X ^ n) ⊆ {k, m, n} :=
support_add.trans
(union_subset
(support_add.trans
(union_subset
((support_C_mul_X_pow' k x).trans (singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_self k {m, n})))
((support_C_mul_X_pow' m y).trans
(singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_insert_self m {n}))))))
((support_C_mul_X_pow' n z).trans
(singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_singleton_self n))))))
end Fewnomials
theorem X_pow_eq_monomial (n) : X ^ n = monomial n (1 : R) := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [pow_zero, monomial_zero_one]
| succ n hn => rw [pow_succ, hn, X, monomial_mul_monomial, one_mul]
@[simp high]
theorem toFinsupp_X_pow (n : ℕ) : (X ^ n).toFinsupp = Finsupp.single n (1 : R) := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial]
theorem smul_X_eq_monomial {n} : a • X ^ n = monomial n (a : R) := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, smul_monomial, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
theorem support_X_pow (H : ¬(1 : R) = 0) (n : ℕ) : (X ^ n : R[X]).support = singleton n := by
convert support_monomial n H
exact X_pow_eq_monomial n
theorem support_X_empty (H : (1 : R) = 0) : (X : R[X]).support = ∅ := by
rw [X, H, monomial_zero_right, support_zero]
theorem support_X (H : ¬(1 : R) = 0) : (X : R[X]).support = singleton 1 := by
rw [← pow_one X, support_X_pow H 1]
theorem monomial_left_inj {a : R} (ha : a ≠ 0) {i j : ℕ} :
monomial i a = monomial j a ↔ i = j := by
simp only [← ofFinsupp_single, ofFinsupp.injEq, Finsupp.single_left_inj ha]
theorem binomial_eq_binomial {k l m n : ℕ} {u v : R} (hu : u ≠ 0) (hv : v ≠ 0) :
C u * X ^ k + C v * X ^ l = C u * X ^ m + C v * X ^ n ↔
k = m ∧ l = n ∨ u = v ∧ k = n ∧ l = m ∨ u + v = 0 ∧ k = l ∧ m = n := by
simp_rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, ← toFinsupp_inj, toFinsupp_add, toFinsupp_monomial]
exact Finsupp.single_add_single_eq_single_add_single hu hv
theorem natCast_mul (n : ℕ) (p : R[X]) : (n : R[X]) * p = n • p :=
(nsmul_eq_mul _ _).symm
/-- Summing the values of a function applied to the coefficients of a polynomial -/
def sum {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (f : ℕ → R → S) : S :=
∑ n ∈ p.support, f n (p.coeff n)
theorem sum_def {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (f : ℕ → R → S) :
p.sum f = ∑ n ∈ p.support, f n (p.coeff n) :=
rfl
theorem sum_eq_of_subset {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] {p : R[X]} (f : ℕ → R → S)
(hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) {s : Finset ℕ} (hs : p.support ⊆ s) :
p.sum f = ∑ n ∈ s, f n (p.coeff n) :=
Finsupp.sum_of_support_subset _ hs f (fun i _ ↦ hf i)
/-- Expressing the product of two polynomials as a double sum. -/
theorem mul_eq_sum_sum :
p * q = ∑ i ∈ p.support, q.sum fun j a => (monomial (i + j)) (p.coeff i * a) := by
apply toFinsupp_injective
rcases p with ⟨⟩; rcases q with ⟨⟩
simp_rw [sum, coeff, toFinsupp_sum, support, toFinsupp_mul, toFinsupp_monomial,
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_def, Finsupp.sum]
@[simp]
theorem sum_zero_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (f : ℕ → R → S) : (0 : R[X]).sum f = 0 := by
simp [sum]
@[simp]
theorem sum_monomial_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] {n : ℕ} (a : R) (f : ℕ → R → S)
(hf : f n 0 = 0) : (monomial n a : R[X]).sum f = f n a :=
Finsupp.sum_single_index hf
@[simp]
theorem sum_C_index {a} {β} [AddCommMonoid β] {f : ℕ → R → β} (h : f 0 0 = 0) :
(C a).sum f = f 0 a :=
sum_monomial_index a f h
-- the assumption `hf` is only necessary when the ring is trivial
@[simp]
theorem sum_X_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] {f : ℕ → R → S} (hf : f 1 0 = 0) :
(X : R[X]).sum f = f 1 1 :=
sum_monomial_index 1 f hf
theorem sum_add_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p q : R[X]) (f : ℕ → R → S)
(hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) (h_add : ∀ a b₁ b₂, f a (b₁ + b₂) = f a b₁ + f a b₂) :
(p + q).sum f = p.sum f + q.sum f := by
rw [show p + q = ⟨p.toFinsupp + q.toFinsupp⟩ from add_def p q]
exact Finsupp.sum_add_index (fun i _ ↦ hf i) (fun a _ b₁ b₂ ↦ h_add a b₁ b₂)
theorem sum_add' {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (f g : ℕ → R → S) :
p.sum (f + g) = p.sum f + p.sum g := by simp [sum_def, Finset.sum_add_distrib]
theorem sum_add {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (f g : ℕ → R → S) :
(p.sum fun n x => f n x + g n x) = p.sum f + p.sum g :=
sum_add' _ _ _
theorem sum_smul_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (b : R) (f : ℕ → R → S)
(hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) : (b • p).sum f = p.sum fun n a => f n (b * a) :=
Finsupp.sum_smul_index hf
| theorem sum_smul_index' {S T : Type*} [DistribSMul T R] [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (b : T)
(f : ℕ → R → S) (hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) : (b • p).sum f = p.sum fun n a => f n (b • a) :=
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Basic.lean | 893 | 894 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.GroupWithZero.Canonical
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.GroupWithZero
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.OrderClosed
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation.Regular
/-!
# The topology on linearly ordered commutative groups with zero
Let `Γ₀` be a linearly ordered commutative group to which we have adjoined a zero element. Then
`Γ₀` may naturally be endowed with a topology that turns `Γ₀` into a topological monoid.
Neighborhoods of zero are sets containing `{ γ | γ < γ₀ }` for some invertible element `γ₀` and
every invertible element is open. In particular the topology is the following: "a subset `U ⊆ Γ₀`
is open if `0 ∉ U` or if there is an invertible `γ₀ ∈ Γ₀` such that `{ γ | γ < γ₀ } ⊆ U`", see
`WithZeroTopology.isOpen_iff`.
We prove this topology is ordered and T₅ (in addition to be compatible with the monoid
structure).
All this is useful to extend a valuation to a completion. This is an abstract version of how the
absolute value (resp. `p`-adic absolute value) on `ℚ` is extended to `ℝ` (resp. `ℚₚ`).
## Implementation notes
This topology is defined as a scoped instance since it may not be the desired topology on
a linearly ordered commutative group with zero. You can locally activate this topology using
`open WithZeroTopology`.
-/
open Topology Filter TopologicalSpace Filter Set Function
namespace WithZeroTopology
variable {α Γ₀ : Type*} [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀] {γ γ₁ γ₂ : Γ₀} {l : Filter α}
{f : α → Γ₀}
/-- The topology on a linearly ordered commutative group with a zero element adjoined.
A subset U is open if 0 ∉ U or if there is an invertible element γ₀ such that {γ | γ < γ₀} ⊆ U. -/
scoped instance (priority := 100) topologicalSpace : TopologicalSpace Γ₀ :=
nhdsAdjoint 0 <| ⨅ γ ≠ 0, 𝓟 (Iio γ)
theorem nhds_eq_update : (𝓝 : Γ₀ → Filter Γ₀) = update pure 0 (⨅ γ ≠ 0, 𝓟 (Iio γ)) := by
rw [nhds_nhdsAdjoint, sup_of_le_right]
exact le_iInf₂ fun γ hγ ↦ le_principal_iff.2 <| zero_lt_iff.2 hγ
/-!
### Neighbourhoods of zero
-/
theorem nhds_zero : 𝓝 (0 : Γ₀) = ⨅ γ ≠ 0, 𝓟 (Iio γ) := by
rw [nhds_eq_update, update_self]
/-- In a linearly ordered group with zero element adjoined, `U` is a neighbourhood of `0` if and
only if there exists a nonzero element `γ₀` such that `Iio γ₀ ⊆ U`. -/
theorem hasBasis_nhds_zero : (𝓝 (0 : Γ₀)).HasBasis (fun γ : Γ₀ => γ ≠ 0) Iio := by
rw [nhds_zero]
refine hasBasis_biInf_principal ?_ ⟨1, one_ne_zero⟩
exact directedOn_iff_directed.2 (Monotone.directed_ge fun a b hab => Iio_subset_Iio hab)
theorem Iio_mem_nhds_zero (hγ : γ ≠ 0) : Iio γ ∈ 𝓝 (0 : Γ₀) :=
hasBasis_nhds_zero.mem_of_mem hγ
/-- If `γ` is an invertible element of a linearly ordered group with zero element adjoined, then
`Iio (γ : Γ₀)` is a neighbourhood of `0`. -/
theorem nhds_zero_of_units (γ : Γ₀ˣ) : Iio ↑γ ∈ 𝓝 (0 : Γ₀) :=
Iio_mem_nhds_zero γ.ne_zero
theorem tendsto_zero : Tendsto f l (𝓝 (0 : Γ₀)) ↔ ∀ (γ₀) (_ : γ₀ ≠ 0), ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < γ₀ := by
simp [nhds_zero]
/-!
### Neighbourhoods of non-zero elements
-/
/-- The neighbourhood filter of a nonzero element consists of all sets containing that
element. -/
@[simp]
theorem nhds_of_ne_zero {γ : Γ₀} (h₀ : γ ≠ 0) : 𝓝 γ = pure γ :=
nhds_nhdsAdjoint_of_ne _ h₀
/-- The neighbourhood filter of an invertible element consists of all sets containing that
element. -/
theorem nhds_coe_units (γ : Γ₀ˣ) : 𝓝 (γ : Γ₀) = pure (γ : Γ₀) :=
nhds_of_ne_zero γ.ne_zero
/-- If `γ` is an invertible element of a linearly ordered group with zero element adjoined, then
`{γ}` is a neighbourhood of `γ`. -/
theorem singleton_mem_nhds_of_units (γ : Γ₀ˣ) : ({↑γ} : Set Γ₀) ∈ 𝓝 (γ : Γ₀) := by simp
/-- If `γ` is a nonzero element of a linearly ordered group with zero element adjoined, then `{γ}`
is a neighbourhood of `γ`. -/
theorem singleton_mem_nhds_of_ne_zero (h : γ ≠ 0) : ({γ} : Set Γ₀) ∈ 𝓝 (γ : Γ₀) := by simp [h]
theorem hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_zero {x : Γ₀} (h : x ≠ 0) :
HasBasis (𝓝 x) (fun _ : Unit => True) fun _ => {x} := by
rw [nhds_of_ne_zero h]
exact hasBasis_pure _
theorem hasBasis_nhds_units (γ : Γ₀ˣ) :
HasBasis (𝓝 (γ : Γ₀)) (fun _ : Unit => True) fun _ => {↑γ} :=
hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_zero γ.ne_zero
theorem tendsto_of_ne_zero {γ : Γ₀} (h : γ ≠ 0) : Tendsto f l (𝓝 γ) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, f x = γ := by
rw [nhds_of_ne_zero h, tendsto_pure]
|
theorem tendsto_units {γ₀ : Γ₀ˣ} : Tendsto f l (𝓝 (γ₀ : Γ₀)) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, f x = γ₀ :=
tendsto_of_ne_zero γ₀.ne_zero
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/WithZeroTopology.lean | 109 | 112 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Luke Kershaw. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Luke Kershaw, Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Constructions.FiniteProductsOfBinaryProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Triangulated.TriangleShift
/-!
# Pretriangulated Categories
This file contains the definition of pretriangulated categories and triangulated functors
between them.
## Implementation Notes
We work under the assumption that pretriangulated categories are preadditive categories,
but not necessarily additive categories, as is assumed in some sources.
TODO: generalise this to n-angulated categories as in https://arxiv.org/abs/1006.4592
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory Preadditive Limits
universe v v₀ v₁ v₂ u u₀ u₁ u₂
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Pretriangulated ZeroObject
/-
We work in a preadditive category `C` equipped with an additive shift.
-/
variable (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] [HasZeroObject C] [HasShift C ℤ] [Preadditive C]
/-- A preadditive category `C` with an additive shift, and a class of "distinguished triangles"
relative to that shift is called pretriangulated if the following hold:
* Any triangle that is isomorphic to a distinguished triangle is also distinguished.
* Any triangle of the form `(X,X,0,id,0,0)` is distinguished.
* For any morphism `f : X ⟶ Y` there exists a distinguished triangle of the form `(X,Y,Z,f,g,h)`.
* The triangle `(X,Y,Z,f,g,h)` is distinguished if and only if `(Y,Z,X⟦1⟧,g,h,-f⟦1⟧)` is.
* Given a diagram:
```
f g h
X ───> Y ───> Z ───> X⟦1⟧
│ │ │
│a │b │a⟦1⟧'
V V V
X' ───> Y' ───> Z' ───> X'⟦1⟧
f' g' h'
```
where the left square commutes, and whose rows are distinguished triangles,
there exists a morphism `c : Z ⟶ Z'` such that `(a,b,c)` is a triangle morphism.
-/
@[stacks 0145]
class Pretriangulated [∀ n : ℤ, Functor.Additive (shiftFunctor C n)] where
/-- a class of triangle which are called `distinguished` -/
distinguishedTriangles : Set (Triangle C)
/-- a triangle that is isomorphic to a distinguished triangle is distinguished -/
isomorphic_distinguished :
∀ T₁ ∈ distinguishedTriangles, ∀ (T₂) (_ : T₂ ≅ T₁), T₂ ∈ distinguishedTriangles
/-- obvious triangles `X ⟶ X ⟶ 0 ⟶ X⟦1⟧` are distinguished -/
contractible_distinguished : ∀ X : C, contractibleTriangle X ∈ distinguishedTriangles
/-- any morphism `X ⟶ Y` is part of a distinguished triangle `X ⟶ Y ⟶ Z ⟶ X⟦1⟧` -/
distinguished_cocone_triangle :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y),
∃ (Z : C) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (h : Z ⟶ X⟦(1 : ℤ)⟧), Triangle.mk f g h ∈ distinguishedTriangles
/-- a triangle is distinguished iff it is so after rotating it -/
rotate_distinguished_triangle :
∀ T : Triangle C, T ∈ distinguishedTriangles ↔ T.rotate ∈ distinguishedTriangles
/-- given two distinguished triangle, a commutative square
can be extended as morphism of triangles -/
complete_distinguished_triangle_morphism :
∀ (T₁ T₂ : Triangle C) (_ : T₁ ∈ distinguishedTriangles) (_ : T₂ ∈ distinguishedTriangles)
(a : T₁.obj₁ ⟶ T₂.obj₁) (b : T₁.obj₂ ⟶ T₂.obj₂) (_ : T₁.mor₁ ≫ b = a ≫ T₂.mor₁),
∃ c : T₁.obj₃ ⟶ T₂.obj₃, T₁.mor₂ ≫ c = b ≫ T₂.mor₂ ∧ T₁.mor₃ ≫ a⟦1⟧' = c ≫ T₂.mor₃
namespace Pretriangulated
variable [∀ n : ℤ, Functor.Additive (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n)] [hC : Pretriangulated C]
-- Porting note: increased the priority so that we can write `T ∈ distTriang C`, and
-- not just `T ∈ (distTriang C)`
/-- distinguished triangles in a pretriangulated category -/
notation:60 "distTriang " C => @distinguishedTriangles C _ _ _ _ _ _
variable {C}
lemma distinguished_iff_of_iso {T₁ T₂ : Triangle C} (e : T₁ ≅ T₂) :
(T₁ ∈ distTriang C) ↔ T₂ ∈ distTriang C :=
⟨fun hT₁ => isomorphic_distinguished _ hT₁ _ e.symm,
fun hT₂ => isomorphic_distinguished _ hT₂ _ e⟩
/-- Given any distinguished triangle `T`, then we know `T.rotate` is also distinguished.
-/
theorem rot_of_distTriang (T : Triangle C) (H : T ∈ distTriang C) : T.rotate ∈ distTriang C :=
(rotate_distinguished_triangle T).mp H
/-- Given any distinguished triangle `T`, then we know `T.inv_rotate` is also distinguished.
-/
theorem inv_rot_of_distTriang (T : Triangle C) (H : T ∈ distTriang C) :
T.invRotate ∈ distTriang C :=
(rotate_distinguished_triangle T.invRotate).mpr
(isomorphic_distinguished T H T.invRotate.rotate (invRotCompRot.app T))
/-- Given any distinguished triangle
```
f g h
X ───> Y ───> Z ───> X⟦1⟧
```
the composition `f ≫ g = 0`. -/
@[reassoc, stacks 0146]
theorem comp_distTriang_mor_zero₁₂ (T) (H : T ∈ (distTriang C)) : T.mor₁ ≫ T.mor₂ = 0 := by
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ :=
complete_distinguished_triangle_morphism _ _ (contractible_distinguished T.obj₁) H (𝟙 T.obj₁)
T.mor₁ rfl
simpa only [contractibleTriangle_mor₂, zero_comp] using hc.left.symm
/-- Given any distinguished triangle
```
f g h
X ───> Y ───> Z ───> X⟦1⟧
```
the composition `g ≫ h = 0`. -/
@[reassoc, stacks 0146]
theorem comp_distTriang_mor_zero₂₃ (T : Triangle C) (H : T ∈ distTriang C) :
T.mor₂ ≫ T.mor₃ = 0 :=
comp_distTriang_mor_zero₁₂ T.rotate (rot_of_distTriang T H)
/-- Given any distinguished triangle
```
f g h
X ───> Y ───> Z ───> X⟦1⟧
```
the composition `h ≫ f⟦1⟧ = 0`. -/
@[reassoc, stacks 0146]
theorem comp_distTriang_mor_zero₃₁ (T : Triangle C) (H : T ∈ distTriang C) :
T.mor₃ ≫ T.mor₁⟦1⟧' = 0 := by
have H₂ := rot_of_distTriang T.rotate (rot_of_distTriang T H)
simpa using comp_distTriang_mor_zero₁₂ T.rotate.rotate H₂
/-- The short complex `T.obj₁ ⟶ T.obj₂ ⟶ T.obj₃` attached to a distinguished triangle. -/
@[simps]
def shortComplexOfDistTriangle (T : Triangle C) (hT : T ∈ distTriang C) : ShortComplex C :=
ShortComplex.mk T.mor₁ T.mor₂ (comp_distTriang_mor_zero₁₂ _ hT)
/-- The isomorphism between the short complex attached to
two isomorphic distinguished triangles. -/
@[simps!]
def shortComplexOfDistTriangleIsoOfIso {T T' : Triangle C} (e : T ≅ T') (hT : T ∈ distTriang C) :
shortComplexOfDistTriangle T hT ≅ shortComplexOfDistTriangle T'
(isomorphic_distinguished _ hT _ e.symm) :=
ShortComplex.isoMk (Triangle.π₁.mapIso e) (Triangle.π₂.mapIso e) (Triangle.π₃.mapIso e)
/-- Any morphism `Y ⟶ Z` is part of a distinguished triangle `X ⟶ Y ⟶ Z ⟶ X⟦1⟧` -/
lemma distinguished_cocone_triangle₁ {Y Z : C} (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
∃ (X : C) (f : X ⟶ Y) (h : Z ⟶ X⟦(1 : ℤ)⟧), Triangle.mk f g h ∈ distTriang C := by
obtain ⟨X', f', g', mem⟩ := distinguished_cocone_triangle g
exact ⟨_, _, _, inv_rot_of_distTriang _ mem⟩
/-- Any morphism `Z ⟶ X⟦1⟧` is part of a distinguished triangle `X ⟶ Y ⟶ Z ⟶ X⟦1⟧` -/
lemma distinguished_cocone_triangle₂ {Z X : C} (h : Z ⟶ X⟦(1 : ℤ)⟧) :
∃ (Y : C) (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z), Triangle.mk f g h ∈ distTriang C := by
obtain ⟨Y', f', g', mem⟩ := distinguished_cocone_triangle h
let T' := (Triangle.mk h f' g').invRotate.invRotate
refine ⟨T'.obj₂, ((shiftEquiv C (1 : ℤ)).unitIso.app X).hom ≫ T'.mor₁, T'.mor₂,
isomorphic_distinguished _ (inv_rot_of_distTriang _ (inv_rot_of_distTriang _ mem)) _ ?_⟩
exact Triangle.isoMk _ _ ((shiftEquiv C (1 : ℤ)).unitIso.app X) (Iso.refl _) (Iso.refl _)
(by aesop_cat) (by aesop_cat)
(by dsimp; simp only [shift_shiftFunctorCompIsoId_inv_app, id_comp])
/-- A commutative square involving the morphisms `mor₂` of two distinguished triangles
can be extended as morphism of triangles -/
lemma complete_distinguished_triangle_morphism₁ (T₁ T₂ : Triangle C)
(hT₁ : T₁ ∈ distTriang C) (hT₂ : T₂ ∈ distTriang C) (b : T₁.obj₂ ⟶ T₂.obj₂)
(c : T₁.obj₃ ⟶ T₂.obj₃) (comm : T₁.mor₂ ≫ c = b ≫ T₂.mor₂) :
∃ (a : T₁.obj₁ ⟶ T₂.obj₁), T₁.mor₁ ≫ b = a ≫ T₂.mor₁ ∧
T₁.mor₃ ≫ a⟦(1 : ℤ)⟧' = c ≫ T₂.mor₃ := by
obtain ⟨a, ⟨ha₁, ha₂⟩⟩ := complete_distinguished_triangle_morphism _ _
(rot_of_distTriang _ hT₁) (rot_of_distTriang _ hT₂) b c comm
refine ⟨(shiftFunctor C (1 : ℤ)).preimage a, ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· apply (shiftFunctor C (1 : ℤ)).map_injective
dsimp at ha₂
rw [neg_comp, comp_neg, neg_inj] at ha₂
simpa only [Functor.map_comp, Functor.map_preimage] using ha₂
· simpa only [Functor.map_preimage] using ha₁
/-- A commutative square involving the morphisms `mor₃` of two distinguished triangles
can be extended as morphism of triangles -/
lemma complete_distinguished_triangle_morphism₂ (T₁ T₂ : Triangle C)
(hT₁ : T₁ ∈ distTriang C) (hT₂ : T₂ ∈ distTriang C) (a : T₁.obj₁ ⟶ T₂.obj₁)
(c : T₁.obj₃ ⟶ T₂.obj₃) (comm : T₁.mor₃ ≫ a⟦(1 : ℤ)⟧' = c ≫ T₂.mor₃) :
∃ (b : T₁.obj₂ ⟶ T₂.obj₂), T₁.mor₁ ≫ b = a ≫ T₂.mor₁ ∧ T₁.mor₂ ≫ c = b ≫ T₂.mor₂ := by
obtain ⟨a, ⟨ha₁, ha₂⟩⟩ := complete_distinguished_triangle_morphism _ _
(inv_rot_of_distTriang _ hT₁) (inv_rot_of_distTriang _ hT₂) (c⟦(-1 : ℤ)⟧') a (by
dsimp
simp only [neg_comp, comp_neg, ← Functor.map_comp_assoc, ← comm,
Functor.map_comp, shift_shift_neg', Functor.id_obj, assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id_app, comp_id])
refine ⟨a, ⟨ha₁, ?_⟩⟩
dsimp only [Triangle.invRotate, Triangle.mk] at ha₂
rw [← cancel_mono ((shiftEquiv C (1 : ℤ)).counitIso.inv.app T₂.obj₃), assoc, assoc, ← ha₂]
simp only [shiftEquiv'_counitIso, shift_neg_shift', assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id_app_assoc]
/-- Obvious triangles `0 ⟶ X ⟶ X ⟶ 0⟦1⟧` are distinguished -/
lemma contractible_distinguished₁ (X : C) :
Triangle.mk (0 : 0 ⟶ X) (𝟙 X) 0 ∈ distTriang C := by
refine isomorphic_distinguished _
(inv_rot_of_distTriang _ (contractible_distinguished X)) _ ?_
exact Triangle.isoMk _ _ (Functor.mapZeroObject _).symm (Iso.refl _) (Iso.refl _)
(by simp) (by simp) (by simp)
/-- Obvious triangles `X ⟶ 0 ⟶ X⟦1⟧ ⟶ X⟦1⟧` are distinguished -/
lemma contractible_distinguished₂ (X : C) :
Triangle.mk (0 : X ⟶ 0) 0 (𝟙 (X⟦1⟧)) ∈ distTriang C := by
refine isomorphic_distinguished _
(inv_rot_of_distTriang _ (contractible_distinguished₁ (X⟦(1 : ℤ)⟧))) _ ?_
exact Triangle.isoMk _ _ ((shiftEquiv C (1 : ℤ)).unitIso.app X) (Iso.refl _) (Iso.refl _)
(by simp) (by simp)
(by dsimp; simp only [shift_shiftFunctorCompIsoId_inv_app, id_comp])
namespace Triangle
variable (T : Triangle C) (hT : T ∈ distTriang C)
include hT
lemma yoneda_exact₂ {X : C} (f : T.obj₂ ⟶ X) (hf : T.mor₁ ≫ f = 0) :
∃ (g : T.obj₃ ⟶ X), f = T.mor₂ ≫ g := by
obtain ⟨g, ⟨hg₁, _⟩⟩ := complete_distinguished_triangle_morphism T _ hT
(contractible_distinguished₁ X) 0 f (by aesop_cat)
exact ⟨g, by simpa using hg₁.symm⟩
lemma yoneda_exact₃ {X : C} (f : T.obj₃ ⟶ X) (hf : T.mor₂ ≫ f = 0) :
∃ (g : T.obj₁⟦(1 : ℤ)⟧ ⟶ X), f = T.mor₃ ≫ g :=
yoneda_exact₂ _ (rot_of_distTriang _ hT) f hf
lemma coyoneda_exact₂ {X : C} (f : X ⟶ T.obj₂) (hf : f ≫ T.mor₂ = 0) :
∃ (g : X ⟶ T.obj₁), f = g ≫ T.mor₁ := by
obtain ⟨a, ⟨ha₁, _⟩⟩ := complete_distinguished_triangle_morphism₁ _ T
(contractible_distinguished X) hT f 0 (by aesop_cat)
exact ⟨a, by simpa using ha₁⟩
lemma coyoneda_exact₁ {X : C} (f : X ⟶ T.obj₁⟦(1 : ℤ)⟧) (hf : f ≫ T.mor₁⟦1⟧' = 0) :
∃ (g : X ⟶ T.obj₃), f = g ≫ T.mor₃ :=
coyoneda_exact₂ _ (rot_of_distTriang _ (rot_of_distTriang _ hT)) f (by aesop_cat)
lemma coyoneda_exact₃ {X : C} (f : X ⟶ T.obj₃) (hf : f ≫ T.mor₃ = 0) :
∃ (g : X ⟶ T.obj₂), f = g ≫ T.mor₂ :=
coyoneda_exact₂ _ (rot_of_distTriang _ hT) f hf
lemma mor₃_eq_zero_iff_epi₂ : T.mor₃ = 0 ↔ Epi T.mor₂ := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [epi_iff_cancel_zero]
intro X g hg
obtain ⟨f, rfl⟩ := yoneda_exact₃ T hT g hg
rw [h, zero_comp]
· intro
rw [← cancel_epi T.mor₂, comp_distTriang_mor_zero₂₃ _ hT, comp_zero]
lemma mor₂_eq_zero_iff_epi₁ : T.mor₂ = 0 ↔ Epi T.mor₁ := by
have h := mor₃_eq_zero_iff_epi₂ _ (inv_rot_of_distTriang _ hT)
dsimp at h
rw [← h, IsIso.comp_right_eq_zero]
lemma mor₁_eq_zero_iff_epi₃ : T.mor₁ = 0 ↔ Epi T.mor₃ := by
have h := mor₃_eq_zero_iff_epi₂ _ (rot_of_distTriang _ hT)
dsimp at h
rw [← h, neg_eq_zero]
constructor
· intro h
simp only [h, Functor.map_zero]
· intro h
rw [← (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C (1 : ℤ)).map_eq_zero_iff, h]
lemma mor₃_eq_zero_of_epi₂ (h : Epi T.mor₂) : T.mor₃ = 0 := (T.mor₃_eq_zero_iff_epi₂ hT).2 h
lemma mor₂_eq_zero_of_epi₁ (h : Epi T.mor₁) : T.mor₂ = 0 := (T.mor₂_eq_zero_iff_epi₁ hT).2 h
lemma mor₁_eq_zero_of_epi₃ (h : Epi T.mor₃) : T.mor₁ = 0 := (T.mor₁_eq_zero_iff_epi₃ hT).2 h
lemma epi₂ (h : T.mor₃ = 0) : Epi T.mor₂ := (T.mor₃_eq_zero_iff_epi₂ hT).1 h
lemma epi₁ (h : T.mor₂ = 0) : Epi T.mor₁ := (T.mor₂_eq_zero_iff_epi₁ hT).1 h
lemma epi₃ (h : T.mor₁ = 0) : Epi T.mor₃ := (T.mor₁_eq_zero_iff_epi₃ hT).1 h
lemma mor₁_eq_zero_iff_mono₂ : T.mor₁ = 0 ↔ Mono T.mor₂ := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [mono_iff_cancel_zero]
intro X g hg
obtain ⟨f, rfl⟩ := coyoneda_exact₂ T hT g hg
rw [h, comp_zero]
· intro
rw [← cancel_mono T.mor₂, comp_distTriang_mor_zero₁₂ _ hT, zero_comp]
lemma mor₂_eq_zero_iff_mono₃ : T.mor₂ = 0 ↔ Mono T.mor₃ :=
mor₁_eq_zero_iff_mono₂ _ (rot_of_distTriang _ hT)
lemma mor₃_eq_zero_iff_mono₁ : T.mor₃ = 0 ↔ Mono T.mor₁ := by
have h := mor₁_eq_zero_iff_mono₂ _ (inv_rot_of_distTriang _ hT)
dsimp at h
rw [← h, neg_eq_zero, IsIso.comp_right_eq_zero]
constructor
· intro h
simp only [h, Functor.map_zero]
· intro h
rw [← (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C (-1 : ℤ)).map_eq_zero_iff, h]
lemma mor₁_eq_zero_of_mono₂ (h : Mono T.mor₂) : T.mor₁ = 0 := (T.mor₁_eq_zero_iff_mono₂ hT).2 h
lemma mor₂_eq_zero_of_mono₃ (h : Mono T.mor₃) : T.mor₂ = 0 := (T.mor₂_eq_zero_iff_mono₃ hT).2 h
lemma mor₃_eq_zero_of_mono₁ (h : Mono T.mor₁) : T.mor₃ = 0 := (T.mor₃_eq_zero_iff_mono₁ hT).2 h
lemma mono₂ (h : T.mor₁ = 0) : Mono T.mor₂ := (T.mor₁_eq_zero_iff_mono₂ hT).1 h
lemma mono₃ (h : T.mor₂ = 0) : Mono T.mor₃ := (T.mor₂_eq_zero_iff_mono₃ hT).1 h
lemma mono₁ (h : T.mor₃ = 0) : Mono T.mor₁ := (T.mor₃_eq_zero_iff_mono₁ hT).1 h
lemma isZero₂_iff : IsZero T.obj₂ ↔ (T.mor₁ = 0 ∧ T.mor₂ = 0) := by
constructor
· intro h
exact ⟨h.eq_of_tgt _ _, h.eq_of_src _ _⟩
· intro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
obtain ⟨f, hf⟩ := coyoneda_exact₂ T hT (𝟙 _) (by rw [h₂, comp_zero])
rw [IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero, hf, h₁, comp_zero]
lemma isZero₁_iff : IsZero T.obj₁ ↔ (T.mor₁ = 0 ∧ T.mor₃ = 0) := by
refine (isZero₂_iff _ (inv_rot_of_distTriang _ hT)).trans ?_
dsimp
simp only [neg_eq_zero, IsIso.comp_right_eq_zero, Functor.map_eq_zero_iff]
tauto
lemma isZero₃_iff : IsZero T.obj₃ ↔ (T.mor₂ = 0 ∧ T.mor₃ = 0) := by
refine (isZero₂_iff _ (rot_of_distTriang _ hT)).trans ?_
dsimp
tauto
lemma isZero₁_of_isZero₂₃ (h₂ : IsZero T.obj₂) (h₃ : IsZero T.obj₃) : IsZero T.obj₁ := by
rw [T.isZero₁_iff hT]
exact ⟨h₂.eq_of_tgt _ _, h₃.eq_of_src _ _⟩
lemma isZero₂_of_isZero₁₃ (h₁ : IsZero T.obj₁) (h₃ : IsZero T.obj₃) : IsZero T.obj₂ := by
rw [T.isZero₂_iff hT]
exact ⟨h₁.eq_of_src _ _, h₃.eq_of_tgt _ _⟩
lemma isZero₃_of_isZero₁₂ (h₁ : IsZero T.obj₁) (h₂ : IsZero T.obj₂) : IsZero T.obj₃ :=
isZero₂_of_isZero₁₃ _ (rot_of_distTriang _ hT) h₂ (by
dsimp
simp only [IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero] at h₁ ⊢
rw [← Functor.map_id, h₁, Functor.map_zero])
lemma isZero₁_iff_isIso₂ :
IsZero T.obj₁ ↔ IsIso T.mor₂ := by
rw [T.isZero₁_iff hT]
constructor
· intro ⟨h₁, h₃⟩
have := T.epi₂ hT h₃
obtain ⟨f, hf⟩ := yoneda_exact₂ T hT (𝟙 _) (by rw [h₁, zero_comp])
exact ⟨f, hf.symm, by rw [← cancel_epi T.mor₂, comp_id, ← reassoc_of% hf]⟩
· intro
rw [T.mor₁_eq_zero_iff_mono₂ hT, T.mor₃_eq_zero_iff_epi₂ hT]
constructor <;> infer_instance
lemma isZero₂_iff_isIso₃ : IsZero T.obj₂ ↔ IsIso T.mor₃ :=
isZero₁_iff_isIso₂ _ (rot_of_distTriang _ hT)
lemma isZero₃_iff_isIso₁ : IsZero T.obj₃ ↔ IsIso T.mor₁ := by
refine Iff.trans ?_ (Triangle.isZero₁_iff_isIso₂ _ (inv_rot_of_distTriang _ hT))
dsimp
simp only [IsZero.iff_id_eq_zero, ← Functor.map_id, Functor.map_eq_zero_iff]
lemma isZero₁_of_isIso₂ (h : IsIso T.mor₂) : IsZero T.obj₁ := (T.isZero₁_iff_isIso₂ hT).2 h
lemma isZero₂_of_isIso₃ (h : IsIso T.mor₃) : IsZero T.obj₂ := (T.isZero₂_iff_isIso₃ hT).2 h
lemma isZero₃_of_isIso₁ (h : IsIso T.mor₁) : IsZero T.obj₃ := (T.isZero₃_iff_isIso₁ hT).2 h
lemma shift_distinguished (n : ℤ) :
(CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor (Triangle C) n).obj T ∈ distTriang C := by
revert T hT
let H : ℤ → Prop := fun n => ∀ (T : Triangle C) (_ : T ∈ distTriang C),
| (Triangle.shiftFunctor C n).obj T ∈ distTriang C
change H n
have H_zero : H 0 := fun T hT =>
isomorphic_distinguished _ hT _ ((Triangle.shiftFunctorZero C).app T)
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Triangulated/Pretriangulated.lean | 381 | 384 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Kevin Buzzard, Kim Morrison, Johan Commelin, Chris Hughes,
Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Notation.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.FunLike.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
/-!
# Monoid and group homomorphisms
This file defines the bundled structures for monoid and group homomorphisms. Namely, we define
`MonoidHom` (resp., `AddMonoidHom`) to be bundled homomorphisms between multiplicative (resp.,
additive) monoids or groups.
We also define coercion to a function, and usual operations: composition, identity homomorphism,
pointwise multiplication and pointwise inversion.
This file also defines the lesser-used (and notation-less) homomorphism types which are used as
building blocks for other homomorphisms:
* `ZeroHom`
* `OneHom`
* `AddHom`
* `MulHom`
## Notations
* `→+`: Bundled `AddMonoid` homs. Also use for `AddGroup` homs.
* `→*`: Bundled `Monoid` homs. Also use for `Group` homs.
* `→ₙ+`: Bundled `AddSemigroup` homs.
* `→ₙ*`: Bundled `Semigroup` homs.
## Implementation notes
There's a coercion from bundled homs to fun, and the canonical
notation is to use the bundled hom as a function via this coercion.
There is no `GroupHom` -- the idea is that `MonoidHom` is used.
The constructor for `MonoidHom` needs a proof of `map_one` as well
as `map_mul`; a separate constructor `MonoidHom.mk'` will construct
group homs (i.e. monoid homs between groups) given only a proof
that multiplication is preserved,
Implicit `{}` brackets are often used instead of type class `[]` brackets. This is done when the
instances can be inferred because they are implicit arguments to the type `MonoidHom`. When they
can be inferred from the type it is faster to use this method than to use type class inference.
Historically this file also included definitions of unbundled homomorphism classes; they were
deprecated and moved to `Deprecated/Group`.
## Tags
MonoidHom, AddMonoidHom
-/
open Function
variable {ι α β M N P : Type*}
-- monoids
variable {G : Type*} {H : Type*}
-- groups
variable {F : Type*}
-- homs
section Zero
/-- `ZeroHom M N` is the type of functions `M → N` that preserve zero.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : ZeroHom M N)`,
you should parametrize over `(F : Type*) [ZeroHomClass F M N] (f : F)`.
When you extend this structure, make sure to also extend `ZeroHomClass`.
-/
structure ZeroHom (M : Type*) (N : Type*) [Zero M] [Zero N] where
/-- The underlying function -/
protected toFun : M → N
/-- The proposition that the function preserves 0 -/
protected map_zero' : toFun 0 = 0
/-- `ZeroHomClass F M N` states that `F` is a type of zero-preserving homomorphisms.
You should extend this typeclass when you extend `ZeroHom`.
-/
class ZeroHomClass (F : Type*) (M N : outParam Type*) [Zero M] [Zero N] [FunLike F M N] :
Prop where
/-- The proposition that the function preserves 0 -/
map_zero : ∀ f : F, f 0 = 0
-- Instances and lemmas are defined below through `@[to_additive]`.
end Zero
section Add
/-- `M →ₙ+ N` is the type of functions `M → N` that preserve addition. The `ₙ` in the notation
stands for "non-unital" because it is intended to match the notation for `NonUnitalAlgHom` and
`NonUnitalRingHom`, so a `AddHom` is a non-unital additive monoid hom.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : AddHom M N)`,
you should parametrize over `(F : Type*) [AddHomClass F M N] (f : F)`.
When you extend this structure, make sure to extend `AddHomClass`.
-/
structure AddHom (M : Type*) (N : Type*) [Add M] [Add N] where
/-- The underlying function -/
protected toFun : M → N
/-- The proposition that the function preserves addition -/
protected map_add' : ∀ x y, toFun (x + y) = toFun x + toFun y
/-- `M →ₙ+ N` denotes the type of addition-preserving maps from `M` to `N`. -/
infixr:25 " →ₙ+ " => AddHom
/-- `AddHomClass F M N` states that `F` is a type of addition-preserving homomorphisms.
You should declare an instance of this typeclass when you extend `AddHom`.
-/
class AddHomClass (F : Type*) (M N : outParam Type*) [Add M] [Add N] [FunLike F M N] : Prop where
/-- The proposition that the function preserves addition -/
map_add : ∀ (f : F) (x y : M), f (x + y) = f x + f y
-- Instances and lemmas are defined below through `@[to_additive]`.
end Add
section add_zero
/-- `M →+ N` is the type of functions `M → N` that preserve the `AddZeroClass` structure.
`AddMonoidHom` is also used for group homomorphisms.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : M →+ N)`,
you should parametrize over `(F : Type*) [AddMonoidHomClass F M N] (f : F)`.
When you extend this structure, make sure to extend `AddMonoidHomClass`.
-/
structure AddMonoidHom (M : Type*) (N : Type*) [AddZeroClass M] [AddZeroClass N] extends
ZeroHom M N, AddHom M N
attribute [nolint docBlame] AddMonoidHom.toAddHom
attribute [nolint docBlame] AddMonoidHom.toZeroHom
/-- `M →+ N` denotes the type of additive monoid homomorphisms from `M` to `N`. -/
infixr:25 " →+ " => AddMonoidHom
/-- `AddMonoidHomClass F M N` states that `F` is a type of `AddZeroClass`-preserving
homomorphisms.
You should also extend this typeclass when you extend `AddMonoidHom`.
-/
class AddMonoidHomClass (F : Type*) (M N : outParam Type*)
[AddZeroClass M] [AddZeroClass N] [FunLike F M N] : Prop
extends AddHomClass F M N, ZeroHomClass F M N
-- Instances and lemmas are defined below through `@[to_additive]`.
end add_zero
section One
variable [One M] [One N]
/-- `OneHom M N` is the type of functions `M → N` that preserve one.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : OneHom M N)`,
you should parametrize over `(F : Type*) [OneHomClass F M N] (f : F)`.
When you extend this structure, make sure to also extend `OneHomClass`.
-/
@[to_additive]
structure OneHom (M : Type*) (N : Type*) [One M] [One N] where
/-- The underlying function -/
protected toFun : M → N
/-- The proposition that the function preserves 1 -/
protected map_one' : toFun 1 = 1
/-- `OneHomClass F M N` states that `F` is a type of one-preserving homomorphisms.
You should extend this typeclass when you extend `OneHom`.
-/
@[to_additive]
class OneHomClass (F : Type*) (M N : outParam Type*) [One M] [One N] [FunLike F M N] : Prop where
/-- The proposition that the function preserves 1 -/
map_one : ∀ f : F, f 1 = 1
@[to_additive]
instance OneHom.funLike : FunLike (OneHom M N) M N where
coe := OneHom.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by cases f; cases g; congr
@[to_additive]
instance OneHom.oneHomClass : OneHomClass (OneHom M N) M N where
map_one := OneHom.map_one'
library_note "low priority simp lemmas"
/--
The hom class hierarchy allows for a single lemma, such as `map_one`, to apply to a large variety
of morphism types, so long as they have an instance of `OneHomClass`. For example, this applies to
to `MonoidHom`, `RingHom`, `AlgHom`, `StarAlgHom`, as well as their `Equiv` variants, etc. However,
precisely because these lemmas are so widely applicable, they keys in the `simp` discrimination tree
are necessarily highly non-specific. For example, the key for `map_one` is
`@DFunLike.coe _ _ _ _ _ 1`.
Consequently, whenever lean sees `⇑f 1`, for some `f : F`, it will attempt to synthesize a
`OneHomClass F ?A ?B` instance. If no such instance exists, then Lean will need to traverse (almost)
the entirety of the `FunLike` hierarchy in order to determine this because so many classes have a
`OneHomClass` instance (in fact, this problem is likely worse for `ZeroHomClass`). This can lead to
a significant performance hit when `map_one` fails to apply.
To avoid this problem, we mark these widely applicable simp lemmas with key discimination tree keys
with `low` priority in order to ensure that they are not tried first.
-/
variable [FunLike F M N]
/-- See note [low priority simp lemmas] -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp low)]
theorem map_one [OneHomClass F M N] (f : F) : f 1 = 1 :=
OneHomClass.map_one f
@[to_additive] lemma map_comp_one [OneHomClass F M N] (f : F) : f ∘ (1 : ι → M) = 1 := by simp
/-- In principle this could be an instance, but in practice it causes performance issues. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem Subsingleton.of_oneHomClass [Subsingleton M] [OneHomClass F M N] :
Subsingleton F where
allEq f g := DFunLike.ext _ _ fun x ↦ by simp [Subsingleton.elim x 1]
@[to_additive] instance [Subsingleton M] : Subsingleton (OneHom M N) := .of_oneHomClass
@[to_additive]
theorem map_eq_one_iff [OneHomClass F M N] (f : F) (hf : Function.Injective f)
{x : M} :
f x = 1 ↔ x = 1 := hf.eq_iff' (map_one f)
@[to_additive]
theorem map_ne_one_iff {R S F : Type*} [One R] [One S] [FunLike F R S] [OneHomClass F R S] (f : F)
(hf : Function.Injective f) {x : R} : f x ≠ 1 ↔ x ≠ 1 := (map_eq_one_iff f hf).not
@[to_additive]
theorem ne_one_of_map {R S F : Type*} [One R] [One S] [FunLike F R S] [OneHomClass F R S]
{f : F} {x : R} (hx : f x ≠ 1) : x ≠ 1 := ne_of_apply_ne f <| (by rwa [(map_one f)])
/-- Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `OneHomClass F M N` into an actual
`OneHom`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `OneHom M N`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := coe)
"Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `ZeroHomClass F M N` into an actual
`ZeroHom`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `ZeroHom M N`."]
def OneHomClass.toOneHom [OneHomClass F M N] (f : F) : OneHom M N where
toFun := f
map_one' := map_one f
/-- Any type satisfying `OneHomClass` can be cast into `OneHom` via `OneHomClass.toOneHom`. -/
@[to_additive "Any type satisfying `ZeroHomClass` can be cast into `ZeroHom` via
`ZeroHomClass.toZeroHom`. "]
instance [OneHomClass F M N] : CoeTC F (OneHom M N) :=
⟨OneHomClass.toOneHom⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem OneHom.coe_coe [OneHomClass F M N] (f : F) :
((f : OneHom M N) : M → N) = f := rfl
end One
section Mul
variable [Mul M] [Mul N]
/-- `M →ₙ* N` is the type of functions `M → N` that preserve multiplication. The `ₙ` in the notation
stands for "non-unital" because it is intended to match the notation for `NonUnitalAlgHom` and
`NonUnitalRingHom`, so a `MulHom` is a non-unital monoid hom.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : M →ₙ* N)`,
you should parametrize over `(F : Type*) [MulHomClass F M N] (f : F)`.
When you extend this structure, make sure to extend `MulHomClass`.
-/
@[to_additive]
structure MulHom (M : Type*) (N : Type*) [Mul M] [Mul N] where
/-- The underlying function -/
protected toFun : M → N
/-- The proposition that the function preserves multiplication -/
protected map_mul' : ∀ x y, toFun (x * y) = toFun x * toFun y
/-- `M →ₙ* N` denotes the type of multiplication-preserving maps from `M` to `N`. -/
infixr:25 " →ₙ* " => MulHom
/-- `MulHomClass F M N` states that `F` is a type of multiplication-preserving homomorphisms.
You should declare an instance of this typeclass when you extend `MulHom`.
-/
@[to_additive]
class MulHomClass (F : Type*) (M N : outParam Type*) [Mul M] [Mul N] [FunLike F M N] : Prop where
/-- The proposition that the function preserves multiplication -/
map_mul : ∀ (f : F) (x y : M), f (x * y) = f x * f y
@[to_additive]
instance MulHom.funLike : FunLike (M →ₙ* N) M N where
coe := MulHom.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by cases f; cases g; congr
/-- `MulHom` is a type of multiplication-preserving homomorphisms -/
@[to_additive "`AddHom` is a type of addition-preserving homomorphisms"]
instance MulHom.mulHomClass : MulHomClass (M →ₙ* N) M N where
map_mul := MulHom.map_mul'
variable [FunLike F M N]
/-- See note [low priority simp lemmas] -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp low)]
theorem map_mul [MulHomClass F M N] (f : F) (x y : M) : f (x * y) = f x * f y :=
MulHomClass.map_mul f x y
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma map_comp_mul [MulHomClass F M N] (f : F) (g h : ι → M) : f ∘ (g * h) = f ∘ g * f ∘ h := by
ext; simp
/-- Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `MulHomClass F M N` into an actual
`MulHom`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `M →ₙ* N`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := coe)
"Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `AddHomClass F M N` into an actual
`AddHom`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `M →ₙ+ N`."]
def MulHomClass.toMulHom [MulHomClass F M N] (f : F) : M →ₙ* N where
toFun := f
map_mul' := map_mul f
/-- Any type satisfying `MulHomClass` can be cast into `MulHom` via `MulHomClass.toMulHom`. -/
@[to_additive "Any type satisfying `AddHomClass` can be cast into `AddHom` via
`AddHomClass.toAddHom`."]
instance [MulHomClass F M N] : CoeTC F (M →ₙ* N) :=
⟨MulHomClass.toMulHom⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MulHom.coe_coe [MulHomClass F M N] (f : F) : ((f : MulHom M N) : M → N) = f := rfl
end Mul
section mul_one
variable [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N]
/-- `M →* N` is the type of functions `M → N` that preserve the `Monoid` structure.
`MonoidHom` is also used for group homomorphisms.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : M →* N)`,
you should parametrize over `(F : Type*) [MonoidHomClass F M N] (f : F)`.
When you extend this structure, make sure to extend `MonoidHomClass`.
-/
@[to_additive]
structure MonoidHom (M : Type*) (N : Type*) [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] extends
OneHom M N, M →ₙ* N
attribute [nolint docBlame] MonoidHom.toMulHom
attribute [nolint docBlame] MonoidHom.toOneHom
/-- `M →* N` denotes the type of monoid homomorphisms from `M` to `N`. -/
infixr:25 " →* " => MonoidHom
/-- `MonoidHomClass F M N` states that `F` is a type of `Monoid`-preserving homomorphisms.
You should also extend this typeclass when you extend `MonoidHom`. -/
@[to_additive]
class MonoidHomClass (F : Type*) (M N : outParam Type*) [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N]
[FunLike F M N] : Prop
extends MulHomClass F M N, OneHomClass F M N
@[to_additive]
instance MonoidHom.instFunLike : FunLike (M →* N) M N where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by
cases f
cases g
congr
apply DFunLike.coe_injective'
exact h
@[to_additive]
instance MonoidHom.instMonoidHomClass : MonoidHomClass (M →* N) M N where
map_mul := MonoidHom.map_mul'
map_one f := f.toOneHom.map_one'
@[to_additive] instance [Subsingleton M] : Subsingleton (M →* N) := .of_oneHomClass
variable [FunLike F M N]
/-- Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `MonoidHomClass F M N` into an actual
`MonoidHom`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `M →* N`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := coe)
"Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `AddMonoidHomClass F M N` into an
actual `MonoidHom`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `M →+ N`."]
def MonoidHomClass.toMonoidHom [MonoidHomClass F M N] (f : F) : M →* N :=
{ (f : M →ₙ* N), (f : OneHom M N) with }
/-- Any type satisfying `MonoidHomClass` can be cast into `MonoidHom` via
`MonoidHomClass.toMonoidHom`. -/
@[to_additive "Any type satisfying `AddMonoidHomClass` can be cast into `AddMonoidHom` via
`AddMonoidHomClass.toAddMonoidHom`."]
instance [MonoidHomClass F M N] : CoeTC F (M →* N) :=
⟨MonoidHomClass.toMonoidHom⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MonoidHom.coe_coe [MonoidHomClass F M N] (f : F) : ((f : M →* N) : M → N) = f := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem map_mul_eq_one [MonoidHomClass F M N] (f : F) {a b : M} (h : a * b = 1) :
f a * f b = 1 := by
rw [← map_mul, h, map_one]
variable [FunLike F G H]
@[to_additive]
theorem map_div' [DivInvMonoid G] [DivInvMonoid H] [MulHomClass F G H]
(f : F) (hf : ∀ a, f a⁻¹ = (f a)⁻¹) (a b : G) : f (a / b) = f a / f b := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, map_mul, hf]
@[to_additive]
lemma map_comp_div' [DivInvMonoid G] [DivInvMonoid H] [MulHomClass F G H] (f : F)
(hf : ∀ a, f a⁻¹ = (f a)⁻¹) (g h : ι → G) : f ∘ (g / h) = f ∘ g / f ∘ h := by
ext; simp [map_div' f hf]
/-- Group homomorphisms preserve inverse.
See note [low priority simp lemmas] -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp low) "Additive group homomorphisms preserve negation."]
theorem map_inv [Group G] [DivisionMonoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H]
(f : F) (a : G) : f a⁻¹ = (f a)⁻¹ :=
eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left <| map_mul_eq_one f <| inv_mul_cancel _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma map_comp_inv [Group G] [DivisionMonoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) (g : ι → G) :
f ∘ g⁻¹ = (f ∘ g)⁻¹ := by ext; simp
/-- Group homomorphisms preserve division. -/
@[to_additive "Additive group homomorphisms preserve subtraction."]
theorem map_mul_inv [Group G] [DivisionMonoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) (a b : G) :
f (a * b⁻¹) = f a * (f b)⁻¹ := by rw [map_mul, map_inv]
@[to_additive]
lemma map_comp_mul_inv [Group G] [DivisionMonoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) (g h : ι → G) :
f ∘ (g * h⁻¹) = f ∘ g * (f ∘ h)⁻¹ := by simp
/-- Group homomorphisms preserve division.
See note [low priority simp lemmas] -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp low) "Additive group homomorphisms preserve subtraction."]
theorem map_div [Group G] [DivisionMonoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) :
∀ a b, f (a / b) = f a / f b := map_div' _ <| map_inv f
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma map_comp_div [Group G] [DivisionMonoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) (g h : ι → G) :
f ∘ (g / h) = f ∘ g / f ∘ h := by ext; simp
/-- See note [low priority simp lemmas] -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp low) (reorder := 9 10)]
theorem map_pow [Monoid G] [Monoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) (a : G) :
∀ n : ℕ, f (a ^ n) = f a ^ n
| 0 => by rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, map_one]
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ, pow_succ, map_mul, map_pow f a n]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma map_comp_pow [Monoid G] [Monoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) (g : ι → G) (n : ℕ) :
f ∘ (g ^ n) = f ∘ g ^ n := by ext; simp
@[to_additive]
theorem map_zpow' [DivInvMonoid G] [DivInvMonoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H]
(f : F) (hf : ∀ x : G, f x⁻¹ = (f x)⁻¹) (a : G) : ∀ n : ℤ, f (a ^ n) = f a ^ n
| (n : ℕ) => by rw [zpow_natCast, map_pow, zpow_natCast]
| Int.negSucc n => by rw [zpow_negSucc, hf, map_pow, ← zpow_negSucc]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma map_comp_zpow' [DivInvMonoid G] [DivInvMonoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F)
(hf : ∀ x : G, f x⁻¹ = (f x)⁻¹) (g : ι → G) (n : ℤ) : f ∘ (g ^ n) = f ∘ g ^ n := by
ext; simp [map_zpow' f hf]
/-- Group homomorphisms preserve integer power.
See note [low priority simp lemmas] -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp low) (reorder := 9 10)
"Additive group homomorphisms preserve integer scaling."]
theorem map_zpow [Group G] [DivisionMonoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H]
(f : F) (g : G) (n : ℤ) : f (g ^ n) = f g ^ n := map_zpow' f (map_inv f) g n
@[to_additive]
lemma map_comp_zpow [Group G] [DivisionMonoid H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) (g : ι → G)
(n : ℤ) : f ∘ (g ^ n) = f ∘ g ^ n := by simp
end mul_one
-- completely uninteresting lemmas about coercion to function, that all homs need
section Coes
/-! Bundled morphisms can be down-cast to weaker bundlings -/
attribute [coe] MonoidHom.toOneHom
attribute [coe] AddMonoidHom.toZeroHom
/-- `MonoidHom` down-cast to a `OneHom`, forgetting the multiplicative property. -/
@[to_additive "`AddMonoidHom` down-cast to a `ZeroHom`, forgetting the additive property"]
instance MonoidHom.coeToOneHom [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] :
Coe (M →* N) (OneHom M N) := ⟨MonoidHom.toOneHom⟩
attribute [coe] MonoidHom.toMulHom
attribute [coe] AddMonoidHom.toAddHom
/-- `MonoidHom` down-cast to a `MulHom`, forgetting the 1-preserving property. -/
@[to_additive "`AddMonoidHom` down-cast to an `AddHom`, forgetting the 0-preserving property."]
instance MonoidHom.coeToMulHom [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] :
Coe (M →* N) (M →ₙ* N) := ⟨MonoidHom.toMulHom⟩
-- these must come after the coe_toFun definitions
initialize_simps_projections ZeroHom (toFun → apply)
initialize_simps_projections AddHom (toFun → apply)
initialize_simps_projections AddMonoidHom (toFun → apply)
initialize_simps_projections OneHom (toFun → apply)
initialize_simps_projections MulHom (toFun → apply)
initialize_simps_projections MonoidHom (toFun → apply)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem OneHom.coe_mk [One M] [One N] (f : M → N) (h1) : (OneHom.mk f h1 : M → N) = f := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem OneHom.toFun_eq_coe [One M] [One N] (f : OneHom M N) : f.toFun = f := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MulHom.coe_mk [Mul M] [Mul N] (f : M → N) (hmul) : (MulHom.mk f hmul : M → N) = f := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MulHom.toFun_eq_coe [Mul M] [Mul N] (f : M →ₙ* N) : f.toFun = f := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MonoidHom.coe_mk [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] (f hmul) :
(MonoidHom.mk f hmul : M → N) = f := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MonoidHom.toOneHom_coe [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] (f : M →* N) :
(f.toOneHom : M → N) = f := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MonoidHom.toMulHom_coe [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] (f : M →* N) :
f.toMulHom.toFun = f := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.toFun_eq_coe [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] (f : M →* N) : f.toFun = f := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := ext)]
theorem OneHom.ext [One M] [One N] ⦃f g : OneHom M N⦄ (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
@[to_additive (attr := ext)]
theorem MulHom.ext [Mul M] [Mul N] ⦃f g : M →ₙ* N⦄ (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
@[to_additive (attr := ext)]
theorem MonoidHom.ext [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] ⦃f g : M →* N⦄ (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
namespace MonoidHom
variable [Group G]
variable [MulOneClass M]
/-- Makes a group homomorphism from a proof that the map preserves multiplication. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps -fullyApplied)
"Makes an additive group homomorphism from a proof that the map preserves addition."]
def mk' (f : M → G) (map_mul : ∀ a b : M, f (a * b) = f a * f b) : M →* G where
toFun := f
map_mul' := map_mul
map_one' := by rw [← mul_right_cancel_iff, ← map_mul _ 1, one_mul, one_mul]
end MonoidHom
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem OneHom.mk_coe [One M] [One N] (f : OneHom M N) (h1) : OneHom.mk f h1 = f :=
OneHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MulHom.mk_coe [Mul M] [Mul N] (f : M →ₙ* N) (hmul) : MulHom.mk f hmul = f :=
MulHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MonoidHom.mk_coe [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] (f : M →* N) (hmul) :
MonoidHom.mk f hmul = f := MonoidHom.ext fun _ => rfl
end Coes
/-- Copy of a `OneHom` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
@[to_additive
"Copy of a `ZeroHom` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix
definitional equalities."]
protected def OneHom.copy [One M] [One N] (f : OneHom M N) (f' : M → N) (h : f' = f) :
OneHom M N where
toFun := f'
map_one' := h.symm ▸ f.map_one'
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem OneHom.coe_copy {_ : One M} {_ : One N} (f : OneHom M N) (f' : M → N) (h : f' = f) :
(f.copy f' h) = f' :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem OneHom.coe_copy_eq {_ : One M} {_ : One N} (f : OneHom M N) (f' : M → N) (h : f' = f) :
f.copy f' h = f :=
DFunLike.ext' h
/-- Copy of a `MulHom` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
@[to_additive
"Copy of an `AddHom` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix
definitional equalities."]
protected def MulHom.copy [Mul M] [Mul N] (f : M →ₙ* N) (f' : M → N) (h : f' = f) :
M →ₙ* N where
toFun := f'
map_mul' := h.symm ▸ f.map_mul'
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MulHom.coe_copy {_ : Mul M} {_ : Mul N} (f : M →ₙ* N) (f' : M → N) (h : f' = f) :
(f.copy f' h) = f' :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem MulHom.coe_copy_eq {_ : Mul M} {_ : Mul N} (f : M →ₙ* N) (f' : M → N) (h : f' = f) :
f.copy f' h = f :=
DFunLike.ext' h
/-- Copy of a `MonoidHom` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix
definitional equalities. -/
@[to_additive
"Copy of an `AddMonoidHom` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix
definitional equalities."]
protected def MonoidHom.copy [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] (f : M →* N) (f' : M → N)
(h : f' = f) : M →* N :=
{ f.toOneHom.copy f' h, f.toMulHom.copy f' h with }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MonoidHom.coe_copy {_ : MulOneClass M} {_ : MulOneClass N} (f : M →* N) (f' : M → N)
(h : f' = f) : (f.copy f' h) = f' :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.copy_eq {_ : MulOneClass M} {_ : MulOneClass N} (f : M →* N) (f' : M → N)
(h : f' = f) : f.copy f' h = f :=
DFunLike.ext' h
@[to_additive]
protected theorem OneHom.map_one [One M] [One N] (f : OneHom M N) : f 1 = 1 :=
f.map_one'
/-- If `f` is a monoid homomorphism then `f 1 = 1`. -/
@[to_additive "If `f` is an additive monoid homomorphism then `f 0 = 0`."]
protected theorem MonoidHom.map_one [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] (f : M →* N) : f 1 = 1 :=
f.map_one'
@[to_additive]
protected theorem MulHom.map_mul [Mul M] [Mul N] (f : M →ₙ* N) (a b : M) : f (a * b) = f a * f b :=
f.map_mul' a b
/-- If `f` is a monoid homomorphism then `f (a * b) = f a * f b`. -/
@[to_additive "If `f` is an additive monoid homomorphism then `f (a + b) = f a + f b`."]
protected theorem MonoidHom.map_mul [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] (f : M →* N) (a b : M) :
f (a * b) = f a * f b := f.map_mul' a b
namespace MonoidHom
variable [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] [FunLike F M N] [MonoidHomClass F M N]
/-- Given a monoid homomorphism `f : M →* N` and an element `x : M`, if `x` has a right inverse,
then `f x` has a right inverse too. For elements invertible on both sides see `IsUnit.map`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given an AddMonoid homomorphism `f : M →+ N` and an element `x : M`, if `x` has
a right inverse, then `f x` has a right inverse too."]
theorem map_exists_right_inv (f : F) {x : M} (hx : ∃ y, x * y = 1) : ∃ y, f x * y = 1 :=
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hx
⟨f y, map_mul_eq_one f hy⟩
/-- Given a monoid homomorphism `f : M →* N` and an element `x : M`, if `x` has a left inverse,
then `f x` has a left inverse too. For elements invertible on both sides see `IsUnit.map`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given an AddMonoid homomorphism `f : M →+ N` and an element `x : M`, if `x` has
a left inverse, then `f x` has a left inverse too. For elements invertible on both sides see
`IsAddUnit.map`."]
theorem map_exists_left_inv (f : F) {x : M} (hx : ∃ y, y * x = 1) : ∃ y, y * f x = 1 :=
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hx
⟨f y, map_mul_eq_one f hy⟩
end MonoidHom
/-- The identity map from a type with 1 to itself. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps) "The identity map from a type with zero to itself."]
def OneHom.id (M : Type*) [One M] : OneHom M M where
toFun x := x
map_one' := rfl
/-- The identity map from a type with multiplication to itself. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps) "The identity map from a type with addition to itself."]
def MulHom.id (M : Type*) [Mul M] : M →ₙ* M where
toFun x := x
map_mul' _ _ := rfl
/-- The identity map from a monoid to itself. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps) "The identity map from an additive monoid to itself."]
def MonoidHom.id (M : Type*) [MulOneClass M] : M →* M where
toFun x := x
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' _ _ := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma OneHom.coe_id {M : Type*} [One M] : (OneHom.id M : M → M) = _root_.id := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma MulHom.coe_id {M : Type*} [Mul M] : (MulHom.id M : M → M) = _root_.id := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma MonoidHom.coe_id {M : Type*} [MulOneClass M] : (MonoidHom.id M : M → M) = _root_.id := rfl
/-- Composition of `OneHom`s as a `OneHom`. -/
@[to_additive "Composition of `ZeroHom`s as a `ZeroHom`."]
def OneHom.comp [One M] [One N] [One P] (hnp : OneHom N P) (hmn : OneHom M N) : OneHom M P where
toFun := hnp ∘ hmn
map_one' := by simp
/-- Composition of `MulHom`s as a `MulHom`. -/
@[to_additive "Composition of `AddHom`s as an `AddHom`."]
def MulHom.comp [Mul M] [Mul N] [Mul P] (hnp : N →ₙ* P) (hmn : M →ₙ* N) : M →ₙ* P where
toFun := hnp ∘ hmn
map_mul' x y := by simp
/-- Composition of monoid morphisms as a monoid morphism. -/
@[to_additive "Composition of additive monoid morphisms as an additive monoid morphism."]
def MonoidHom.comp [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] [MulOneClass P] (hnp : N →* P) (hmn : M →* N) :
M →* P where
toFun := hnp ∘ hmn
map_one' := by simp
map_mul' := by simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem OneHom.coe_comp [One M] [One N] [One P] (g : OneHom N P) (f : OneHom M N) :
↑(g.comp f) = g ∘ f := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MulHom.coe_comp [Mul M] [Mul N] [Mul P] (g : N →ₙ* P) (f : M →ₙ* N) :
↑(g.comp f) = g ∘ f := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MonoidHom.coe_comp [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] [MulOneClass P]
(g : N →* P) (f : M →* N) : ↑(g.comp f) = g ∘ f := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem OneHom.comp_apply [One M] [One N] [One P] (g : OneHom N P) (f : OneHom M N) (x : M) :
g.comp f x = g (f x) := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem MulHom.comp_apply [Mul M] [Mul N] [Mul P] (g : N →ₙ* P) (f : M →ₙ* N) (x : M) :
g.comp f x = g (f x) := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.comp_apply [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] [MulOneClass P]
(g : N →* P) (f : M →* N) (x : M) : g.comp f x = g (f x) := rfl
/-- Composition of monoid homomorphisms is associative. -/
@[to_additive "Composition of additive monoid homomorphisms is associative."]
theorem OneHom.comp_assoc {Q : Type*} [One M] [One N] [One P] [One Q]
(f : OneHom M N) (g : OneHom N P) (h : OneHom P Q) :
(h.comp g).comp f = h.comp (g.comp f) := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem MulHom.comp_assoc {Q : Type*} [Mul M] [Mul N] [Mul P] [Mul Q]
(f : M →ₙ* N) (g : N →ₙ* P) (h : P →ₙ* Q) : (h.comp g).comp f = h.comp (g.comp f) := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.comp_assoc {Q : Type*} [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] [MulOneClass P]
[MulOneClass Q] (f : M →* N) (g : N →* P) (h : P →* Q) :
(h.comp g).comp f = h.comp (g.comp f) := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem OneHom.cancel_right [One M] [One N] [One P] {g₁ g₂ : OneHom N P} {f : OneHom M N}
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : g₁.comp f = g₂.comp f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
⟨fun h => OneHom.ext <| hf.forall.2 (DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h), fun h => h ▸ rfl⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem MulHom.cancel_right [Mul M] [Mul N] [Mul P] {g₁ g₂ : N →ₙ* P} {f : M →ₙ* N}
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : g₁.comp f = g₂.comp f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
⟨fun h => MulHom.ext <| hf.forall.2 (DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h), fun h => h ▸ rfl⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.cancel_right [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] [MulOneClass P]
{g₁ g₂ : N →* P} {f : M →* N} (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
g₁.comp f = g₂.comp f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
⟨fun h => MonoidHom.ext <| hf.forall.2 (DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h), fun h => h ▸ rfl⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem OneHom.cancel_left [One M] [One N] [One P] {g : OneHom N P} {f₁ f₂ : OneHom M N}
(hg : Function.Injective g) : g.comp f₁ = g.comp f₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ :=
⟨fun h => OneHom.ext fun x => hg <| by rw [← OneHom.comp_apply, h, OneHom.comp_apply],
fun h => h ▸ rfl⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem MulHom.cancel_left [Mul M] [Mul N] [Mul P] {g : N →ₙ* P} {f₁ f₂ : M →ₙ* N}
(hg : Function.Injective g) : g.comp f₁ = g.comp f₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ :=
⟨fun h => MulHom.ext fun x => hg <| by rw [← MulHom.comp_apply, h, MulHom.comp_apply],
fun h => h ▸ rfl⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.cancel_left [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] [MulOneClass P]
{g : N →* P} {f₁ f₂ : M →* N} (hg : Function.Injective g) : g.comp f₁ = g.comp f₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ :=
⟨fun h => MonoidHom.ext fun x => hg <| by rw [← MonoidHom.comp_apply, h, MonoidHom.comp_apply],
fun h => h ▸ rfl⟩
section
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.toOneHom_injective [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] :
Function.Injective (MonoidHom.toOneHom : (M →* N) → OneHom M N) :=
Function.Injective.of_comp (f := DFunLike.coe) DFunLike.coe_injective
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.toMulHom_injective [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] :
Function.Injective (MonoidHom.toMulHom : (M →* N) → M →ₙ* N) :=
Function.Injective.of_comp (f := DFunLike.coe) DFunLike.coe_injective
end
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem OneHom.comp_id [One M] [One N] (f : OneHom M N) : f.comp (OneHom.id M) = f :=
OneHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MulHom.comp_id [Mul M] [Mul N] (f : M →ₙ* N) : f.comp (MulHom.id M) = f :=
MulHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MonoidHom.comp_id [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] (f : M →* N) :
f.comp (MonoidHom.id M) = f := MonoidHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem OneHom.id_comp [One M] [One N] (f : OneHom M N) : (OneHom.id N).comp f = f :=
OneHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MulHom.id_comp [Mul M] [Mul N] (f : M →ₙ* N) : (MulHom.id N).comp f = f :=
MulHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem MonoidHom.id_comp [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] (f : M →* N) :
(MonoidHom.id N).comp f = f := MonoidHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[to_additive]
protected theorem MonoidHom.map_pow [Monoid M] [Monoid N] (f : M →* N) (a : M) (n : ℕ) :
f (a ^ n) = f a ^ n := map_pow f a n
@[to_additive]
protected theorem MonoidHom.map_zpow' [DivInvMonoid M] [DivInvMonoid N] (f : M →* N)
(hf : ∀ x, f x⁻¹ = (f x)⁻¹) (a : M) (n : ℤ) :
f (a ^ n) = f a ^ n := map_zpow' f hf a n
/-- Makes a `OneHom` inverse from the bijective inverse of a `OneHom` -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps)
"Make a `ZeroHom` inverse from the bijective inverse of a `ZeroHom`"]
def OneHom.inverse [One M] [One N]
(f : OneHom M N) (g : N → M)
(h₁ : Function.LeftInverse g f) :
OneHom N M :=
{ toFun := g,
map_one' := by rw [← f.map_one, h₁] }
/-- Makes a multiplicative inverse from a bijection which preserves multiplication. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps)
"Makes an additive inverse from a bijection which preserves addition."]
def MulHom.inverse [Mul M] [Mul N] (f : M →ₙ* N) (g : N → M)
(h₁ : Function.LeftInverse g f)
(h₂ : Function.RightInverse g f) : N →ₙ* M where
toFun := g
map_mul' x y :=
calc
g (x * y) = g (f (g x) * f (g y)) := by rw [h₂ x, h₂ y]
_ = g (f (g x * g y)) := by rw [f.map_mul]
_ = g x * g y := h₁ _
/-- If `M` and `N` have multiplications, `f : M →ₙ* N` is a surjective multiplicative map,
and `M` is commutative, then `N` is commutative. -/
@[to_additive
"If `M` and `N` have additions, `f : M →ₙ+ N` is a surjective additive map,
and `M` is commutative, then `N` is commutative."]
theorem Function.Surjective.mul_comm [Mul M] [Mul N] {f : M →ₙ* N}
(is_surj : Function.Surjective f) (is_comm : Std.Commutative (· * · : M → M → M)) :
Std.Commutative (· * · : N → N → N) where
comm := fun a b ↦ by
obtain ⟨a', ha'⟩ := is_surj a
obtain ⟨b', hb'⟩ := is_surj b
simp only [← ha', ← hb', ← map_mul]
rw [is_comm.comm]
/-- The inverse of a bijective `MonoidHom` is a `MonoidHom`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps)
"The inverse of a bijective `AddMonoidHom` is an `AddMonoidHom`."]
def MonoidHom.inverse {A B : Type*} [Monoid A] [Monoid B] (f : A →* B) (g : B → A)
(h₁ : Function.LeftInverse g f) (h₂ : Function.RightInverse g f) : B →* A :=
{ (f : OneHom A B).inverse g h₁,
(f : A →ₙ* B).inverse g h₁ h₂ with toFun := g }
section End
namespace Monoid
variable (M) [MulOneClass M]
/-- The monoid of endomorphisms. -/
@[to_additive "The monoid of endomorphisms.", to_additive_dont_translate]
protected def End := M →* M
namespace End
@[to_additive]
instance instFunLike : FunLike (Monoid.End M) M M := MonoidHom.instFunLike
@[to_additive]
instance instMonoidHomClass : MonoidHomClass (Monoid.End M) M M := MonoidHom.instMonoidHomClass
@[to_additive instOne]
instance instOne : One (Monoid.End M) where one := .id _
@[to_additive instMul]
instance instMul : Mul (Monoid.End M) where mul := .comp
@[to_additive instMonoid]
instance instMonoid : Monoid (Monoid.End M) where
mul := MonoidHom.comp
one := MonoidHom.id M
mul_assoc _ _ _ := MonoidHom.comp_assoc _ _ _
mul_one := MonoidHom.comp_id
one_mul := MonoidHom.id_comp
npow n f := (npowRec n f).copy f^[n] <| by induction n <;> simp [npowRec, *] <;> rfl
npow_succ _ _ := DFunLike.coe_injective <| Function.iterate_succ _ _
@[to_additive]
instance : Inhabited (Monoid.End M) := ⟨1⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast) coe_pow]
lemma coe_pow (f : Monoid.End M) (n : ℕ) : (↑(f ^ n) : M → M) = f^[n] := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) coe_one]
theorem coe_one : ((1 : Monoid.End M) : M → M) = id := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) coe_mul]
theorem coe_mul (f g) : ((f * g : Monoid.End M) : M → M) = f ∘ g := rfl
end End
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")] protected alias coe_one := End.coe_one
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")] protected alias coe_mul := End.coe_mul
| end Monoid
end End
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Hom/Defs.lean | 950 | 953 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Sébastien Gouëzel, Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Subspace
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.SesquilinearForm
/-!
# Orthogonal complements of submodules
In this file, the `orthogonal` complement of a submodule `K` is defined, and basic API established.
Some of the more subtle results about the orthogonal complement are delayed to
`Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Projection`.
See also `BilinForm.orthogonal` for orthogonality with respect to a general bilinear form.
## Notation
The orthogonal complement of a submodule `K` is denoted by `Kᗮ`.
The proposition that two submodules are orthogonal, `Submodule.IsOrtho`, is denoted by `U ⟂ V`.
Note this is not the same unicode symbol as `⊥` (`Bot`).
-/
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
namespace Submodule
variable (K : Submodule 𝕜 E)
/-- The subspace of vectors orthogonal to a given subspace, denoted `Kᗮ`. -/
def orthogonal : Submodule 𝕜 E where
carrier := { v | ∀ u ∈ K, ⟪u, v⟫ = 0 }
zero_mem' _ _ := inner_zero_right _
add_mem' hx hy u hu := by rw [inner_add_right, hx u hu, hy u hu, add_zero]
smul_mem' c x hx u hu := by rw [inner_smul_right, hx u hu, mul_zero]
@[inherit_doc]
notation:1200 K "ᗮ" => orthogonal K
/-- When a vector is in `Kᗮ`. -/
theorem mem_orthogonal (v : E) : v ∈ Kᗮ ↔ ∀ u ∈ K, ⟪u, v⟫ = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
/-- When a vector is in `Kᗮ`, with the inner product the
other way round. -/
theorem mem_orthogonal' (v : E) : v ∈ Kᗮ ↔ ∀ u ∈ K, ⟪v, u⟫ = 0 := by
simp_rw [mem_orthogonal, inner_eq_zero_symm]
variable {K}
/-- A vector in `K` is orthogonal to one in `Kᗮ`. -/
theorem inner_right_of_mem_orthogonal {u v : E} (hu : u ∈ K) (hv : v ∈ Kᗮ) : ⟪u, v⟫ = 0 :=
(K.mem_orthogonal v).1 hv u hu
/-- A vector in `Kᗮ` is orthogonal to one in `K`. -/
theorem inner_left_of_mem_orthogonal {u v : E} (hu : u ∈ K) (hv : v ∈ Kᗮ) : ⟪v, u⟫ = 0 := by
rw [inner_eq_zero_symm]; exact inner_right_of_mem_orthogonal hu hv
/-- A vector is in `(𝕜 ∙ u)ᗮ` iff it is orthogonal to `u`. -/
theorem mem_orthogonal_singleton_iff_inner_right {u v : E} : v ∈ (𝕜 ∙ u)ᗮ ↔ ⟪u, v⟫ = 0 := by
refine ⟨inner_right_of_mem_orthogonal (mem_span_singleton_self u), ?_⟩
intro hv w hw
rw [mem_span_singleton] at hw
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := hw
simp [inner_smul_left, hv]
/-- A vector in `(𝕜 ∙ u)ᗮ` is orthogonal to `u`. -/
theorem mem_orthogonal_singleton_iff_inner_left {u v : E} : v ∈ (𝕜 ∙ u)ᗮ ↔ ⟪v, u⟫ = 0 := by
rw [mem_orthogonal_singleton_iff_inner_right, inner_eq_zero_symm]
theorem sub_mem_orthogonal_of_inner_left {x y : E} (h : ∀ v : K, ⟪x, v⟫ = ⟪y, v⟫) : x - y ∈ Kᗮ := by
rw [mem_orthogonal']
intro u hu
rw [inner_sub_left, sub_eq_zero]
exact h ⟨u, hu⟩
theorem sub_mem_orthogonal_of_inner_right {x y : E} (h : ∀ v : K, ⟪(v : E), x⟫ = ⟪(v : E), y⟫) :
x - y ∈ Kᗮ := by
intro u hu
rw [inner_sub_right, sub_eq_zero]
exact h ⟨u, hu⟩
variable (K)
/-- `K` and `Kᗮ` have trivial intersection. -/
theorem inf_orthogonal_eq_bot : K ⊓ Kᗮ = ⊥ := by
| rw [eq_bot_iff]
intro x
rw [mem_inf]
exact fun ⟨hx, ho⟩ => inner_self_eq_zero.1 (ho x hx)
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Orthogonal.lean | 93 | 97 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Bryan Gin-ge Chen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Adam Topaz, Bryan Gin-ge Chen, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Basic
/-!
# Symmetric difference and bi-implication
This file defines the symmetric difference and bi-implication operators in (co-)Heyting algebras.
## Examples
Some examples are
* The symmetric difference of two sets is the set of elements that are in either but not both.
* The symmetric difference on propositions is `Xor'`.
* The symmetric difference on `Bool` is `Bool.xor`.
* The equivalence of propositions. Two propositions are equivalent if they imply each other.
* The symmetric difference translates to addition when considering a Boolean algebra as a Boolean
ring.
## Main declarations
* `symmDiff`: The symmetric difference operator, defined as `(a \ b) ⊔ (b \ a)`
* `bihimp`: The bi-implication operator, defined as `(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)`
In generalized Boolean algebras, the symmetric difference operator is:
* `symmDiff_comm`: commutative, and
* `symmDiff_assoc`: associative.
## Notations
* `a ∆ b`: `symmDiff a b`
* `a ⇔ b`: `bihimp a b`
## References
The proof of associativity follows the note "Associativity of the Symmetric Difference of Sets: A
Proof from the Book" by John McCuan:
* <https://people.math.gatech.edu/~mccuan/courses/4317/symmetricdifference.pdf>
## Tags
boolean ring, generalized boolean algebra, boolean algebra, symmetric difference, bi-implication,
Heyting
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function OrderDual
variable {ι α β : Type*} {π : ι → Type*}
/-- The symmetric difference operator on a type with `⊔` and `\` is `(A \ B) ⊔ (B \ A)`. -/
def symmDiff [Max α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : α :=
a \ b ⊔ b \ a
/-- The Heyting bi-implication is `(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)`. This generalizes equivalence of
propositions. -/
def bihimp [Min α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : α :=
(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)
/-- Notation for symmDiff -/
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ∆ " => symmDiff
/-- Notation for bihimp -/
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ⇔ " => bihimp
open scoped symmDiff
theorem symmDiff_def [Max α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : a ∆ b = a \ b ⊔ b \ a :=
rfl
theorem bihimp_def [Min α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : a ⇔ b = (b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) :=
rfl
theorem symmDiff_eq_Xor' (p q : Prop) : p ∆ q = Xor' p q :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_iff_iff {p q : Prop} : p ⇔ q ↔ (p ↔ q) :=
iff_iff_implies_and_implies.symm.trans Iff.comm
@[simp]
theorem Bool.symmDiff_eq_xor : ∀ p q : Bool, p ∆ q = xor p q := by decide
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] (a b c : α)
@[simp]
theorem toDual_symmDiff : toDual (a ∆ b) = toDual a ⇔ toDual b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_bihimp (a b : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (a ⇔ b) = ofDual a ∆ ofDual b :=
rfl
theorem symmDiff_comm : a ∆ b = b ∆ a := by simp only [symmDiff, sup_comm]
instance symmDiff_isCommutative : Std.Commutative (α := α) (· ∆ ·) :=
⟨symmDiff_comm⟩
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_self : a ∆ a = ⊥ := by rw [symmDiff, sup_idem, sdiff_self]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_bot : a ∆ ⊥ = a := by rw [symmDiff, sdiff_bot, bot_sdiff, sup_bot_eq]
@[simp]
theorem bot_symmDiff : ⊥ ∆ a = a := by rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_bot]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_eq_bot {a b : α} : a ∆ b = ⊥ ↔ a = b := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, sup_eq_bot_iff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff, le_antisymm_iff]
theorem symmDiff_of_le {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : a ∆ b = b \ a := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 h, bot_sup_eq]
theorem symmDiff_of_ge {a b : α} (h : b ≤ a) : a ∆ b = a \ b := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 h, sup_bot_eq]
theorem symmDiff_le {a b c : α} (ha : a ≤ b ⊔ c) (hb : b ≤ a ⊔ c) : a ∆ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (sdiff_le_iff.2 ha) <| sdiff_le_iff.2 hb
theorem symmDiff_le_iff {a b c : α} : a ∆ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c ∧ b ≤ a ⊔ c := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_le_sup {a b : α} : a ∆ b ≤ a ⊔ b :=
sup_le_sup sdiff_le sdiff_le
theorem symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf : a ∆ b = (a ⊔ b) \ (a ⊓ b) := by simp [sup_sdiff, symmDiff]
theorem Disjoint.symmDiff_eq_sup {a b : α} (h : Disjoint a b) : a ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff, h.sdiff_eq_left, h.sdiff_eq_right]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff : a ∆ b \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) := by
rw [symmDiff, sup_sdiff_distrib, sdiff_sdiff_left, sdiff_sdiff_left]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_inf : a ∆ b \ (a ⊓ b) = a ∆ b := by
rw [symmDiff_sdiff]
simp [symmDiff]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup : a ∆ (b \ a) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_idem]
exact
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup sdiff_le sdiff_le)
(sup_le le_sdiff_sup <| le_sdiff_sup.trans <| sup_le le_sup_right le_sdiff_sup)
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup : (a \ b) ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup, sup_comm]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sup_inf : a ∆ b ⊔ a ⊓ b = a ⊔ b := by
refine le_antisymm (sup_le symmDiff_le_sup inf_le_sup) ?_
rw [sup_inf_left, symmDiff]
refine sup_le (le_inf le_sup_right ?_) (le_inf ?_ le_sup_right)
· rw [sup_right_comm]
exact le_sup_of_le_left le_sdiff_sup
· rw [sup_assoc]
exact le_sup_of_le_right le_sdiff_sup
@[simp]
theorem inf_sup_symmDiff : a ⊓ b ⊔ a ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by rw [sup_comm, symmDiff_sup_inf]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_inf : a ∆ b ∆ (a ⊓ b) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [← symmDiff_sdiff_inf a, sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup, symmDiff_sup_inf]
@[simp]
theorem inf_symmDiff_symmDiff : (a ⊓ b) ∆ (a ∆ b) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_symmDiff_inf]
theorem symmDiff_triangle : a ∆ c ≤ a ∆ b ⊔ b ∆ c := by
refine (sup_le_sup (sdiff_triangle a b c) <| sdiff_triangle _ b _).trans_eq ?_
rw [sup_comm (c \ b), sup_sup_sup_comm, symmDiff, symmDiff]
theorem le_symmDiff_sup_right (a b : α) : a ≤ (a ∆ b) ⊔ b := by
convert symmDiff_triangle a b ⊥ <;> rw [symmDiff_bot]
theorem le_symmDiff_sup_left (a b : α) : b ≤ (a ∆ b) ⊔ a :=
symmDiff_comm a b ▸ le_symmDiff_sup_right ..
end GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] (a b c : α)
@[simp]
theorem toDual_bihimp : toDual (a ⇔ b) = toDual a ∆ toDual b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_symmDiff (a b : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (a ∆ b) = ofDual a ⇔ ofDual b :=
rfl
theorem bihimp_comm : a ⇔ b = b ⇔ a := by simp only [(· ⇔ ·), inf_comm]
instance bihimp_isCommutative : Std.Commutative (α := α) (· ⇔ ·) :=
⟨bihimp_comm⟩
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_self : a ⇔ a = ⊤ := by rw [bihimp, inf_idem, himp_self]
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_top : a ⇔ ⊤ = a := by rw [bihimp, himp_top, top_himp, inf_top_eq]
@[simp]
theorem top_bihimp : ⊤ ⇔ a = a := by rw [bihimp_comm, bihimp_top]
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_eq_top {a b : α} : a ⇔ b = ⊤ ↔ a = b :=
@symmDiff_eq_bot αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem bihimp_of_le {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : a ⇔ b = b ⇨ a := by
rw [bihimp, himp_eq_top_iff.2 h, inf_top_eq]
theorem bihimp_of_ge {a b : α} (h : b ≤ a) : a ⇔ b = a ⇨ b := by
rw [bihimp, himp_eq_top_iff.2 h, top_inf_eq]
theorem le_bihimp {a b c : α} (hb : a ⊓ b ≤ c) (hc : a ⊓ c ≤ b) : a ≤ b ⇔ c :=
le_inf (le_himp_iff.2 hc) <| le_himp_iff.2 hb
theorem le_bihimp_iff {a b c : α} : a ≤ b ⇔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c ∧ a ⊓ c ≤ b := by
simp_rw [bihimp, le_inf_iff, le_himp_iff, and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem inf_le_bihimp {a b : α} : a ⊓ b ≤ a ⇔ b :=
inf_le_inf le_himp le_himp
theorem bihimp_eq_inf_himp_inf : a ⇔ b = a ⊔ b ⇨ a ⊓ b := by simp [himp_inf_distrib, bihimp]
theorem Codisjoint.bihimp_eq_inf {a b : α} (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇔ b = a ⊓ b := by
rw [bihimp, h.himp_eq_left, h.himp_eq_right]
theorem himp_bihimp : a ⇨ b ⇔ c = (a ⊓ c ⇨ b) ⊓ (a ⊓ b ⇨ c) := by
rw [bihimp, himp_inf_distrib, himp_himp, himp_himp]
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_bihimp : a ⊔ b ⇨ a ⇔ b = a ⇔ b := by
rw [himp_bihimp]
simp [bihimp]
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_himp_eq_inf : a ⇔ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem himp_bihimp_eq_inf : (b ⇨ a) ⇔ b = a ⊓ b :=
@sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_inf_sup : a ⇔ b ⊓ (a ⊔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_sup_inf αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sup_inf_bihimp : (a ⊔ b) ⊓ a ⇔ b = a ⊓ b :=
@inf_sup_symmDiff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_bihimp_sup : a ⇔ b ⇔ (a ⊔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_symmDiff_inf αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sup_bihimp_bihimp : (a ⊔ b) ⇔ (a ⇔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@inf_symmDiff_symmDiff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem bihimp_triangle : a ⇔ b ⊓ b ⇔ c ≤ a ⇔ c :=
@symmDiff_triangle αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
end GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
section CoheytingAlgebra
variable [CoheytingAlgebra α] (a : α)
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_top' : a ∆ ⊤ = ￢a := by simp [symmDiff]
@[simp]
theorem top_symmDiff' : ⊤ ∆ a = ￢a := by simp [symmDiff]
@[simp]
theorem hnot_symmDiff_self : (￢a) ∆ a = ⊤ := by
rw [eq_top_iff, symmDiff, hnot_sdiff, sup_sdiff_self]
exact Codisjoint.top_le codisjoint_hnot_left
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_hnot_self : a ∆ (￢a) = ⊤ := by rw [symmDiff_comm, hnot_symmDiff_self]
theorem IsCompl.symmDiff_eq_top {a b : α} (h : IsCompl a b) : a ∆ b = ⊤ := by
rw [h.eq_hnot, hnot_symmDiff_self]
end CoheytingAlgebra
section HeytingAlgebra
variable [HeytingAlgebra α] (a : α)
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_bot : a ⇔ ⊥ = aᶜ := by simp [bihimp]
@[simp]
theorem bot_bihimp : ⊥ ⇔ a = aᶜ := by simp [bihimp]
@[simp]
theorem compl_bihimp_self : aᶜ ⇔ a = ⊥ :=
@hnot_symmDiff_self αᵒᵈ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_hnot_self : a ⇔ aᶜ = ⊥ :=
@symmDiff_hnot_self αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem IsCompl.bihimp_eq_bot {a b : α} (h : IsCompl a b) : a ⇔ b = ⊥ := by
rw [h.eq_compl, compl_bihimp_self]
end HeytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] (a b c d : α)
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_symmDiff : (a ⊔ b) \ a ∆ b = a ⊓ b :=
sdiff_eq_symm inf_le_sup (by rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf])
theorem disjoint_symmDiff_inf : Disjoint (a ∆ b) (a ⊓ b) := by
rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf]
exact disjoint_sdiff_self_left
theorem inf_symmDiff_distrib_left : a ⊓ b ∆ c = (a ⊓ b) ∆ (a ⊓ c) := by
rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf, inf_sdiff_distrib_left, inf_sup_left, inf_inf_distrib_left,
symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf]
theorem inf_symmDiff_distrib_right : a ∆ b ⊓ c = (a ⊓ c) ∆ (b ⊓ c) := by
simp_rw [inf_comm _ c, inf_symmDiff_distrib_left]
theorem sdiff_symmDiff : c \ a ∆ b = c ⊓ a ⊓ b ⊔ c \ a ⊓ c \ b := by
simp only [(· ∆ ·), sdiff_sdiff_sup_sdiff']
theorem sdiff_symmDiff' : c \ a ∆ b = c ⊓ a ⊓ b ⊔ c \ (a ⊔ b) := by
rw [sdiff_symmDiff, sdiff_sup]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_left : a ∆ b \ a = b \ a := by
rw [symmDiff_def, sup_sdiff, sdiff_idem, sdiff_sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_right : a ∆ b \ b = a \ b := by rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_sdiff_left]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_symmDiff_left : a \ a ∆ b = a ⊓ b := by simp [sdiff_symmDiff]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_symmDiff_right : b \ a ∆ b = a ⊓ b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, inf_comm, sdiff_symmDiff_left]
theorem symmDiff_eq_sup : a ∆ b = a ⊔ b ↔ Disjoint a b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, Disjoint.symmDiff_eq_sup⟩
rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf, sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint] at h
exact h.of_disjoint_inf_of_le le_sup_left
@[simp]
theorem le_symmDiff_iff_left : a ≤ a ∆ b ↔ Disjoint a b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.symmDiff_eq_sup.symm ▸ le_sup_left⟩
rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf] at h
exact disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr (le_sdiff_right.1 <| inf_le_of_left_le h).le
@[simp]
theorem le_symmDiff_iff_right : b ≤ a ∆ b ↔ Disjoint a b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, le_symmDiff_iff_left, disjoint_comm]
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_left :
a ∆ b ∆ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) ⊔ c \ (a ⊔ b) ⊔ a ⊓ b ⊓ c :=
calc
a ∆ b ∆ c = a ∆ b \ c ⊔ c \ a ∆ b := symmDiff_def _ _
_ = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) ⊔ (c \ (a ⊔ b) ⊔ c ⊓ a ⊓ b) := by
{ rw [sdiff_symmDiff', sup_comm (c ⊓ a ⊓ b), symmDiff_sdiff] }
_ = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) ⊔ c \ (a ⊔ b) ⊔ a ⊓ b ⊓ c := by ac_rfl
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_right :
a ∆ (b ∆ c) = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) ⊔ c \ (a ⊔ b) ⊔ a ⊓ b ⊓ c :=
calc
a ∆ (b ∆ c) = a \ b ∆ c ⊔ b ∆ c \ a := symmDiff_def _ _
_ = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ a ⊓ b ⊓ c ⊔ (b \ (c ⊔ a) ⊔ c \ (b ⊔ a)) := by
{ rw [sdiff_symmDiff', sup_comm (a ⊓ b ⊓ c), symmDiff_sdiff] }
_ = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) ⊔ c \ (a ⊔ b) ⊔ a ⊓ b ⊓ c := by ac_rfl
theorem symmDiff_assoc : a ∆ b ∆ c = a ∆ (b ∆ c) := by
rw [symmDiff_symmDiff_left, symmDiff_symmDiff_right]
instance symmDiff_isAssociative : Std.Associative (α := α) (· ∆ ·) :=
⟨symmDiff_assoc⟩
theorem symmDiff_left_comm : a ∆ (b ∆ c) = b ∆ (a ∆ c) := by
simp_rw [← symmDiff_assoc, symmDiff_comm]
theorem symmDiff_right_comm : a ∆ b ∆ c = a ∆ c ∆ b := by simp_rw [symmDiff_assoc, symmDiff_comm]
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_symmDiff_comm : a ∆ b ∆ (c ∆ d) = a ∆ c ∆ (b ∆ d) := by
simp_rw [symmDiff_assoc, symmDiff_left_comm]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_cancel_left : a ∆ (a ∆ b) = b := by simp [← symmDiff_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_cancel_right : b ∆ a ∆ a = b := by simp [symmDiff_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_self' : a ∆ b ∆ a = b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_symmDiff_cancel_left]
theorem symmDiff_left_involutive (a : α) : Involutive (· ∆ a) :=
symmDiff_symmDiff_cancel_right _
theorem symmDiff_right_involutive (a : α) : Involutive (a ∆ ·) :=
symmDiff_symmDiff_cancel_left _
theorem symmDiff_left_injective (a : α) : Injective (· ∆ a) :=
Function.Involutive.injective (symmDiff_left_involutive a)
theorem symmDiff_right_injective (a : α) : Injective (a ∆ ·) :=
Function.Involutive.injective (symmDiff_right_involutive _)
theorem symmDiff_left_surjective (a : α) : Surjective (· ∆ a) :=
Function.Involutive.surjective (symmDiff_left_involutive _)
theorem symmDiff_right_surjective (a : α) : Surjective (a ∆ ·) :=
Function.Involutive.surjective (symmDiff_right_involutive _)
variable {a b c}
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_left_inj : a ∆ b = c ∆ b ↔ a = c :=
(symmDiff_left_injective _).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_right_inj : a ∆ b = a ∆ c ↔ b = c :=
(symmDiff_right_injective _).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_eq_left : a ∆ b = a ↔ b = ⊥ :=
calc
a ∆ b = a ↔ a ∆ b = a ∆ ⊥ := by rw [symmDiff_bot]
_ ↔ b = ⊥ := by rw [symmDiff_right_inj]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_eq_right : a ∆ b = b ↔ a = ⊥ := by rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_eq_left]
protected theorem Disjoint.symmDiff_left (ha : Disjoint a c) (hb : Disjoint b c) :
Disjoint (a ∆ b) c := by
rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf]
exact (ha.sup_left hb).disjoint_sdiff_left
protected theorem Disjoint.symmDiff_right (ha : Disjoint a b) (hb : Disjoint a c) :
Disjoint a (b ∆ c) :=
(ha.symm.symmDiff_left hb.symm).symm
theorem symmDiff_eq_iff_sdiff_eq (ha : a ≤ c) : a ∆ b = c ↔ c \ a = b := by
rw [← symmDiff_of_le ha]
exact ((symmDiff_right_involutive a).toPerm _).apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply.trans eq_comm
end GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
section BooleanAlgebra
variable [BooleanAlgebra α] (a b c d : α)
/-! `CogeneralizedBooleanAlgebra` isn't actually a typeclass, but the lemmas in here are dual to
the `GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra` ones -/
section CogeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
@[simp]
theorem inf_himp_bihimp : a ⇔ b ⇨ a ⊓ b = a ⊔ b :=
@sup_sdiff_symmDiff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem codisjoint_bihimp_sup : Codisjoint (a ⇔ b) (a ⊔ b) :=
| @disjoint_symmDiff_inf αᵒᵈ _ _ _
| Mathlib/Order/SymmDiff.lean | 487 | 488 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Prod.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Prod.PProd
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Basic
/-!
# Injective functions
-/
universe u v w x
namespace Function
/-- `α ↪ β` is a bundled injective function. -/
structure Embedding (α : Sort*) (β : Sort*) where
/-- An embedding as a function. Use coercion instead. -/
toFun : α → β
/-- An embedding is an injective function. Use `Function.Embedding.injective` instead. -/
inj' : Injective toFun
/-- An embedding, a.k.a. a bundled injective function. -/
infixr:25 " ↪ " => Embedding
instance {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} : FunLike (α ↪ β) α β where
coe := Embedding.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by { cases f; cases g; congr }
instance {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} : EmbeddingLike (α ↪ β) α β where
injective' := Embedding.inj'
initialize_simps_projections Embedding (toFun → apply)
instance {α β : Sort*} : CanLift (α → β) (α ↪ β) (↑) Injective where prf f hf := ⟨⟨f, hf⟩, rfl⟩
theorem exists_surjective_iff {α β : Sort*} :
(∃ f : α → β, Surjective f) ↔ Nonempty (α → β) ∧ Nonempty (β ↪ α) :=
⟨fun ⟨f, h⟩ ↦ ⟨⟨f⟩, ⟨⟨_, injective_surjInv h⟩⟩⟩, fun ⟨h, ⟨e⟩⟩ ↦ (nonempty_fun.mp h).elim
(fun _ ↦ ⟨isEmptyElim, (isEmptyElim <| e ·)⟩) fun _ ↦ ⟨_, invFun_surjective e.inj'⟩⟩
instance {α β : Sort*} : CanLift (α → β) (α ↪ β) (↑) Injective where
prf _ h := ⟨⟨_, h⟩, rfl⟩
end Function
section Equiv
variable {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} (f : α ≃ β)
/-- Convert an `α ≃ β` to `α ↪ β`.
This is also available as a coercion `Equiv.coeEmbedding`.
The explicit `Equiv.toEmbedding` version is preferred though, since the coercion can have issues
inferring the type of the resulting embedding. For example:
```lean
-- Works:
example (s : Finset (Fin 3)) (f : Equiv.Perm (Fin 3)) : s.map f.toEmbedding = s.map f := by simp
-- Error, `f` has type `Fin 3 ≃ Fin 3` but is expected to have type `Fin 3 ↪ ?m_1 : Type ?`
example (s : Finset (Fin 3)) (f : Equiv.Perm (Fin 3)) : s.map f = s.map f.toEmbedding := by simp
```
-/
protected def Equiv.toEmbedding : α ↪ β :=
⟨f, f.injective⟩
@[simp]
theorem Equiv.coe_toEmbedding : (f.toEmbedding : α → β) = f :=
rfl
theorem Equiv.toEmbedding_apply (a : α) : f.toEmbedding a = f a :=
rfl
theorem Equiv.toEmbedding_injective : Function.Injective (Equiv.toEmbedding : (α ≃ β) → (α ↪ β)) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ by rwa [DFunLike.ext'_iff] at h ⊢
instance Equiv.coeEmbedding : Coe (α ≃ β) (α ↪ β) :=
⟨Equiv.toEmbedding⟩
@[instance] abbrev Equiv.Perm.coeEmbedding : Coe (Equiv.Perm α) (α ↪ α) :=
Equiv.coeEmbedding
|
end Equiv
| Mathlib/Logic/Embedding/Basic.lean | 85 | 86 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Newell Jensen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Newell Jensen, Mitchell Lee, Óscar Álvarez
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Parity
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Coxeter.Matrix
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.PresentedGroup
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.DivMod
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
import Mathlib.Tactic.Use
/-!
# Coxeter groups and Coxeter systems
This file defines Coxeter groups and Coxeter systems.
Let `B` be a (possibly infinite) type, and let $M = (M_{i,i'})_{i, i' \in B}$ be a matrix
of natural numbers. Further assume that $M$ is a *Coxeter matrix* (`CoxeterMatrix`); that is, $M$ is
symmetric and $M_{i,i'} = 1$ if and only if $i = i'$. The *Coxeter group* associated to $M$
(`CoxeterMatrix.group`) has the presentation
$$\langle \{s_i\}_{i \in B} \vert \{(s_i s_{i'})^{M_{i, i'}}\}_{i, i' \in B} \rangle.$$
The elements $s_i$ are called the *simple reflections* (`CoxeterMatrix.simple`) of the Coxeter
group. Note that every simple reflection is an involution.
A *Coxeter system* (`CoxeterSystem`) is a group $W$, together with an isomorphism between $W$ and
the Coxeter group associated to some Coxeter matrix $M$. By abuse of language, we also say that $W$
is a Coxeter group (`IsCoxeterGroup`), and we may speak of the simple reflections $s_i \in W$
(`CoxeterSystem.simple`). We state all of our results about Coxeter groups in terms of Coxeter
systems where possible.
Let $W$ be a group equipped with a Coxeter system. For all monoids $G$ and all functions
$f \colon B \to G$ whose values satisfy the Coxeter relations, we may lift $f$ to a multiplicative
homomorphism $W \to G$ (`CoxeterSystem.lift`) in a unique way.
A *word* is a sequence of elements of $B$. The word $(i_1, \ldots, i_\ell)$ has a corresponding
product $s_{i_1} \cdots s_{i_\ell} \in W$ (`CoxeterSystem.wordProd`). Every element of $W$ is the
product of some word (`CoxeterSystem.wordProd_surjective`). The words that alternate between two
elements of $B$ (`CoxeterSystem.alternatingWord`) are particularly important.
## Implementation details
Much of the literature on Coxeter groups conflates the set $S = \{s_i : i \in B\} \subseteq W$ of
simple reflections with the set $B$ that indexes the simple reflections. This is usually permissible
because the simple reflections $s_i$ of any Coxeter group are all distinct (a nontrivial fact that
we do not prove in this file). In contrast, we try not to refer to the set $S$ of simple
reflections unless necessary; instead, we state our results in terms of $B$ wherever possible.
## Main definitions
* `CoxeterMatrix.Group`
* `CoxeterSystem`
* `IsCoxeterGroup`
* `CoxeterSystem.simple` : If `cs` is a Coxeter system on the group `W`, then `cs.simple i` is the
simple reflection of `W` at the index `i`.
* `CoxeterSystem.lift` : Extend a function `f : B → G` to a monoid homomorphism `f' : W → G`
satisfying `f' (cs.simple i) = f i` for all `i`.
* `CoxeterSystem.wordProd`
* `CoxeterSystem.alternatingWord`
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, Chapters 4--6*](bourbaki1968) chapter IV
pages 4--5, 13--15
* [J. Baez, *Coxeter and Dynkin Diagrams*](https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/twf_dynkin.pdf)
## TODO
* The simple reflections of a Coxeter system are distinct.
* Introduce some ways to actually construct some Coxeter groups. For example, given a Coxeter matrix
$M : B \times B \to \mathbb{N}$, a real vector space $V$, a basis $\{\alpha_i : i \in B\}$
and a bilinear form $\langle \cdot, \cdot \rangle \colon V \times V \to \mathbb{R}$ satisfying
$$\langle \alpha_i, \alpha_{i'}\rangle = - \cos(\pi / M_{i,i'}),$$ one can form the subgroup of
$GL(V)$ generated by the reflections in the $\alpha_i$, and it is a Coxeter group. We can use this
to combinatorially describe the Coxeter groups of type $A$, $B$, $D$, and $I$.
* State and prove Matsumoto's theorem.
* Classify the finite Coxeter groups.
## Tags
coxeter system, coxeter group
-/
open Function Set List
/-! ### Coxeter groups -/
namespace CoxeterMatrix
variable {B B' : Type*} (M : CoxeterMatrix B) (e : B ≃ B')
/-- The Coxeter relation associated to a Coxeter matrix $M$ and two indices $i, i' \in B$.
That is, the relation $(s_i s_{i'})^{M_{i, i'}}$, considered as an element of the free group
on $\{s_i\}_{i \in B}$.
If $M_{i, i'} = 0$, then this is the identity, indicating that there is no relation between
$s_i$ and $s_{i'}$. -/
def relation (i i' : B) : FreeGroup B := (FreeGroup.of i * FreeGroup.of i') ^ M i i'
/-- The set of all Coxeter relations associated to the Coxeter matrix $M$. -/
def relationsSet : Set (FreeGroup B) := range <| uncurry M.relation
/-- The Coxeter group associated to a Coxeter matrix $M$; that is, the group
$$\langle \{s_i\}_{i \in B} \vert \{(s_i s_{i'})^{M_{i, i'}}\}_{i, i' \in B} \rangle.$$ -/
protected def Group : Type _ := PresentedGroup M.relationsSet
instance : Group M.Group := QuotientGroup.Quotient.group _
/-- The simple reflection of the Coxeter group `M.group` at the index `i`. -/
def simple (i : B) : M.Group := PresentedGroup.of i
theorem reindex_relationsSet :
(M.reindex e).relationsSet =
FreeGroup.freeGroupCongr e '' M.relationsSet := let M' := M.reindex e; calc
Set.range (uncurry M'.relation)
_ = Set.range (uncurry M'.relation ∘ Prod.map e e) := by simp [Set.range_comp]
_ = Set.range (FreeGroup.freeGroupCongr e ∘ uncurry M.relation) := by
apply congrArg Set.range
ext ⟨i, i'⟩
simp [relation, reindex_apply, M']
_ = _ := by simp [Set.range_comp, relationsSet]
/-- The isomorphism between the Coxeter group associated to the reindexed matrix `M.reindex e` and
the Coxeter group associated to `M`. -/
def reindexGroupEquiv : (M.reindex e).Group ≃* M.Group :=
.symm <| QuotientGroup.congr
(Subgroup.normalClosure M.relationsSet)
(Subgroup.normalClosure (M.reindex e).relationsSet)
(FreeGroup.freeGroupCongr e)
(by
rw [reindex_relationsSet,
Subgroup.map_normalClosure _ _ (by simpa using (FreeGroup.freeGroupCongr e).surjective),
MonoidHom.coe_coe])
theorem reindexGroupEquiv_apply_simple (i : B') :
(M.reindexGroupEquiv e) ((M.reindex e).simple i) = M.simple (e.symm i) := rfl
theorem reindexGroupEquiv_symm_apply_simple (i : B) :
(M.reindexGroupEquiv e).symm (M.simple i) = (M.reindex e).simple (e i) := rfl
end CoxeterMatrix
/-! ### Coxeter systems -/
section
variable {B : Type*} (M : CoxeterMatrix B)
/-- A Coxeter system `CoxeterSystem M W` is a structure recording the isomorphism between
a group `W` and the Coxeter group associated to a Coxeter matrix `M`. -/
@[ext]
structure CoxeterSystem (W : Type*) [Group W] where
/-- The isomorphism between `W` and the Coxeter group associated to `M`. -/
mulEquiv : W ≃* M.Group
/-- A group is a Coxeter group if it admits a Coxeter system for some Coxeter matrix `M`. -/
class IsCoxeterGroup.{u} (W : Type u) [Group W] : Prop where
nonempty_system : ∃ B : Type u, ∃ M : CoxeterMatrix B, Nonempty (CoxeterSystem M W)
/-- The canonical Coxeter system on the Coxeter group associated to `M`. -/
def CoxeterMatrix.toCoxeterSystem : CoxeterSystem M M.Group := ⟨.refl _⟩
end
namespace CoxeterSystem
open CoxeterMatrix
variable {B B' : Type*} (e : B ≃ B')
variable {W H : Type*} [Group W] [Group H]
variable {M : CoxeterMatrix B} (cs : CoxeterSystem M W)
/-- Reindex a Coxeter system through a bijection of the indexing sets. -/
@[simps]
protected def reindex (e : B ≃ B') : CoxeterSystem (M.reindex e) W :=
⟨cs.mulEquiv.trans (M.reindexGroupEquiv e).symm⟩
/-- Push a Coxeter system through a group isomorphism. -/
@[simps]
protected def map (e : W ≃* H) : CoxeterSystem M H := ⟨e.symm.trans cs.mulEquiv⟩
/-! ### Simple reflections -/
/-- The simple reflection of `W` at the index `i`. -/
def simple (i : B) : W := cs.mulEquiv.symm (PresentedGroup.of i)
@[simp]
theorem _root_.CoxeterMatrix.toCoxeterSystem_simple (M : CoxeterMatrix B) :
M.toCoxeterSystem.simple = M.simple := rfl
@[simp] theorem reindex_simple (i' : B') : (cs.reindex e).simple i' = cs.simple (e.symm i') := rfl
@[simp] theorem map_simple (e : W ≃* H) (i : B) : (cs.map e).simple i = e (cs.simple i) := rfl
local prefix:100 "s" => cs.simple
@[simp]
theorem simple_mul_simple_self (i : B) : s i * s i = 1 := by
have : (FreeGroup.of i) * (FreeGroup.of i) ∈ M.relationsSet := ⟨(i, i), by simp [relation]⟩
have : (PresentedGroup.mk _ (FreeGroup.of i * FreeGroup.of i) : M.Group) = 1 :=
(QuotientGroup.eq_one_iff _).mpr (Subgroup.subset_normalClosure this)
unfold simple
rw [← map_mul, PresentedGroup.of, map_mul]
exact map_mul_eq_one cs.mulEquiv.symm this
@[simp]
theorem simple_mul_simple_cancel_right {w : W} (i : B) : w * s i * s i = w := by
simp [mul_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem simple_mul_simple_cancel_left {w : W} (i : B) : s i * (s i * w) = w := by
simp [← mul_assoc]
@[simp] theorem simple_sq (i : B) : s i ^ 2 = 1 := pow_two (s i) ▸ cs.simple_mul_simple_self i
@[simp]
theorem inv_simple (i : B) : (s i)⁻¹ = s i :=
(eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_right (cs.simple_mul_simple_self i)).symm
@[simp]
theorem simple_mul_simple_pow (i i' : B) : (s i * s i') ^ M i i' = 1 := by
have : (FreeGroup.of i * FreeGroup.of i') ^ M i i' ∈ M.relationsSet := ⟨(i, i'), rfl⟩
have : (PresentedGroup.mk _ ((FreeGroup.of i * FreeGroup.of i') ^ M i i') : M.Group) = 1 :=
(QuotientGroup.eq_one_iff _).mpr (Subgroup.subset_normalClosure this)
unfold simple
rw [← map_mul, ← map_pow]
exact (MulEquiv.map_eq_one_iff cs.mulEquiv.symm).mpr this
@[simp] theorem simple_mul_simple_pow' (i i' : B) : (s i' * s i) ^ M i i' = 1 :=
M.symmetric i' i ▸ cs.simple_mul_simple_pow i' i
/-- The simple reflections of `W` generate `W` as a group. -/
theorem subgroup_closure_range_simple : Subgroup.closure (range cs.simple) = ⊤ := by
have : cs.simple = cs.mulEquiv.symm ∘ PresentedGroup.of := rfl
rw [this, Set.range_comp, ← MulEquiv.coe_toMonoidHom, ← MonoidHom.map_closure,
PresentedGroup.closure_range_of, ← MonoidHom.range_eq_map]
exact MonoidHom.range_eq_top.2 (MulEquiv.surjective _)
/-- The simple reflections of `W` generate `W` as a monoid. -/
theorem submonoid_closure_range_simple : Submonoid.closure (range cs.simple) = ⊤ := by
have : range cs.simple = range cs.simple ∪ (range cs.simple)⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [inv_range, inv_simple, union_self]
rw [this, ← Subgroup.closure_toSubmonoid, subgroup_closure_range_simple, Subgroup.top_toSubmonoid]
/-! ### Induction principles for Coxeter systems -/
/-- If `p : W → Prop` holds for all simple reflections, it holds for the identity, and it is
preserved under multiplication, then it holds for all elements of `W`. -/
theorem simple_induction {p : W → Prop} (w : W) (simple : ∀ i : B, p (s i)) (one : p 1)
(mul : ∀ w w' : W, p w → p w' → p (w * w')) : p w := by
have := cs.submonoid_closure_range_simple.symm ▸ Submonoid.mem_top w
exact Submonoid.closure_induction (fun x ⟨i, hi⟩ ↦ hi ▸ simple i) one (fun _ _ _ _ ↦ mul _ _)
this
/-- If `p : W → Prop` holds for the identity and it is preserved under multiplying on the left
by a simple reflection, then it holds for all elements of `W`. -/
theorem simple_induction_left {p : W → Prop} (w : W) (one : p 1)
(mul_simple_left : ∀ (w : W) (i : B), p w → p (s i * w)) : p w := by
let p' : (w : W) → w ∈ Submonoid.closure (Set.range cs.simple) → Prop :=
fun w _ ↦ p w
have := cs.submonoid_closure_range_simple.symm ▸ Submonoid.mem_top w
apply Submonoid.closure_induction_left (p := p')
· exact one
· rintro _ ⟨i, rfl⟩ y _
exact mul_simple_left y i
· exact this
/-- If `p : W → Prop` holds for the identity and it is preserved under multiplying on the right
by a simple reflection, then it holds for all elements of `W`. -/
theorem simple_induction_right {p : W → Prop} (w : W) (one : p 1)
(mul_simple_right : ∀ (w : W) (i : B), p w → p (w * s i)) : p w := by
let p' : ((w : W) → w ∈ Submonoid.closure (Set.range cs.simple) → Prop) :=
fun w _ ↦ p w
have := cs.submonoid_closure_range_simple.symm ▸ Submonoid.mem_top w
apply Submonoid.closure_induction_right (p := p')
· exact one
· rintro x _ _ ⟨i, rfl⟩
exact mul_simple_right x i
· exact this
/-! ### Homomorphisms from a Coxeter group -/
/-- If two homomorphisms with domain `W` agree on all simple reflections, then they are equal. -/
theorem ext_simple {G : Type*} [MulOneClass G] {φ₁ φ₂ : W →* G} (h : ∀ i : B, φ₁ (s i) = φ₂ (s i)) :
φ₁ = φ₂ :=
MonoidHom.eq_of_eqOn_denseM cs.submonoid_closure_range_simple (fun _ ⟨i, hi⟩ ↦ hi ▸ h i)
/-- The proposition that the values of the function `f : B → G` satisfy the Coxeter relations
corresponding to the matrix `M`. -/
def _root_.CoxeterMatrix.IsLiftable {G : Type*} [Monoid G] (M : CoxeterMatrix B) (f : B → G) :
Prop := ∀ i i', (f i * f i') ^ M i i' = 1
private theorem relations_liftable {G : Type*} [Group G] {f : B → G} (hf : IsLiftable M f)
(r : FreeGroup B) (hr : r ∈ M.relationsSet) : (FreeGroup.lift f) r = 1 := by
rcases hr with ⟨⟨i, i'⟩, rfl⟩
rw [uncurry, relation, map_pow, map_mul, FreeGroup.lift.of, FreeGroup.lift.of]
exact hf i i'
private def groupLift {G : Type*} [Group G] {f : B → G} (hf : IsLiftable M f) : W →* G :=
(PresentedGroup.toGroup (relations_liftable hf)).comp cs.mulEquiv.toMonoidHom
private def restrictUnit {G : Type*} [Monoid G] {f : B → G} (hf : IsLiftable M f) (i : B) :
Gˣ where
val := f i
inv := f i
val_inv := pow_one (f i * f i) ▸ M.diagonal i ▸ hf i i
inv_val := pow_one (f i * f i) ▸ M.diagonal i ▸ hf i i
private theorem toMonoidHom_apply_symm_apply (a : PresentedGroup (M.relationsSet)) :
(MulEquiv.toMonoidHom cs.mulEquiv : W →* PresentedGroup (M.relationsSet))
((MulEquiv.symm cs.mulEquiv) a) = a := calc
_ = cs.mulEquiv ((MulEquiv.symm cs.mulEquiv) a) := by rfl
_ = _ := by rw [MulEquiv.apply_symm_apply]
/-- The universal mapping property of Coxeter systems. For any monoid `G`,
functions `f : B → G` whose values satisfy the Coxeter relations are equivalent to
monoid homomorphisms `f' : W → G`. -/
def lift {G : Type*} [Monoid G] : {f : B → G // IsLiftable M f} ≃ (W →* G) where
toFun f := MonoidHom.comp (Units.coeHom G) (cs.groupLift
(show ∀ i i', ((restrictUnit f.property) i * (restrictUnit f.property) i') ^ M i i' = 1 from
fun i i' ↦ Units.ext (f.property i i')))
invFun ι := ⟨ι ∘ cs.simple, fun i i' ↦ by
rw [comp_apply, comp_apply, ← map_mul, ← map_pow, simple_mul_simple_pow, map_one]⟩
left_inv f := by
ext i
simp only [MonoidHom.comp_apply, comp_apply, mem_setOf_eq, groupLift, simple]
rw [← MonoidHom.toFun_eq_coe, toMonoidHom_apply_symm_apply, PresentedGroup.toGroup.of,
OneHom.toFun_eq_coe, MonoidHom.toOneHom_coe, Units.coeHom_apply, restrictUnit]
right_inv ι := by
apply cs.ext_simple
intro i
dsimp only
rw [groupLift, simple, MonoidHom.comp_apply, MonoidHom.comp_apply, toMonoidHom_apply_symm_apply,
PresentedGroup.toGroup.of, CoxeterSystem.restrictUnit, Units.coeHom_apply]
simp only [comp_apply, simple]
@[simp]
theorem lift_apply_simple {G : Type*} [Monoid G] {f : B → G} (hf : IsLiftable M f) (i : B) :
cs.lift ⟨f, hf⟩ (s i) = f i := congrFun (congrArg Subtype.val (cs.lift.left_inv ⟨f, hf⟩)) i
/-- If two Coxeter systems on the same group `W` have the same Coxeter matrix `M : Matrix B B ℕ`
and the same simple reflection map `B → W`, then they are identical. -/
theorem simple_determines_coxeterSystem :
Injective (simple : CoxeterSystem M W → B → W) := by
intro cs1 cs2 h
apply CoxeterSystem.ext
apply MulEquiv.toMonoidHom_injective
apply cs1.ext_simple
intro i
nth_rw 2 [h]
simp [simple]
/-! ### Words -/
/-- The product of the simple reflections of `W` corresponding to the indices in `ω`. -/
def wordProd (ω : List B) : W := prod (map cs.simple ω)
local prefix:100 "π" => cs.wordProd
@[simp] theorem wordProd_nil : π [] = 1 := by simp [wordProd]
| theorem wordProd_cons (i : B) (ω : List B) : π (i :: ω) = s i * π ω := by simp [wordProd]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Coxeter/Basic.lean | 364 | 364 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Embedding.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
/-!
# The embedding of a cancellative semigroup into itself by multiplication by a fixed element.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero DenselyOrdered
variable {G : Type*}
section LeftOrRightCancelSemigroup
/-- If left-multiplication by any element is cancellative, left-multiplication by `g` is an
embedding. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps)
"If left-addition by any element is cancellative, left-addition by `g` is an
embedding."]
def mulLeftEmbedding [Mul G] [IsLeftCancelMul G] (g : G) : G ↪ G where
toFun h := g * h
inj' := mul_right_injective g
/-- If right-multiplication by any element is cancellative, right-multiplication by `g` is an
embedding. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps)
"If right-addition by any element is cancellative, right-addition by `g` is an
embedding."]
def mulRightEmbedding [Mul G] [IsRightCancelMul G] (g : G) : G ↪ G where
toFun h := h * g
inj' := mul_left_injective g
@[to_additive]
theorem mulLeftEmbedding_eq_mulRightEmbedding [CommMagma G] [IsCancelMul G] (g : G) :
mulLeftEmbedding g = mulRightEmbedding g := by
ext
exact mul_comm _ _
end LeftOrRightCancelSemigroup
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Embedding.lean | 49 | 52 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Slope
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.MeanValue
/-!
# Convexity of functions and derivatives
Here we relate convexity of functions `ℝ → ℝ` to properties of their derivatives.
## Main results
* `MonotoneOn.convexOn_of_deriv`, `convexOn_of_deriv2_nonneg` : if the derivative of a function
is increasing or its second derivative is nonnegative, then the original function is convex.
* `ConvexOn.monotoneOn_deriv`: if a function is convex and differentiable, then its derivative is
monotone.
-/
open Metric Set Asymptotics ContinuousLinearMap Filter
open scoped Topology NNReal
/-!
## Monotonicity of `f'` implies convexity of `f`
-/
/-- If a function `f` is continuous on a convex set `D ⊆ ℝ`, is differentiable on its interior,
and `f'` is monotone on the interior, then `f` is convex on `D`. -/
theorem MonotoneOn.convexOn_of_deriv {D : Set ℝ} (hD : Convex ℝ D) {f : ℝ → ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f D) (hf' : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (interior D))
(hf'_mono : MonotoneOn (deriv f) (interior D)) : ConvexOn ℝ D f :=
convexOn_of_slope_mono_adjacent hD
(by
intro x y z hx hz hxy hyz
-- First we prove some trivial inclusions
have hxzD : Icc x z ⊆ D := hD.ordConnected.out hx hz
have hxyD : Icc x y ⊆ D := (Icc_subset_Icc_right hyz.le).trans hxzD
have hxyD' : Ioo x y ⊆ interior D :=
subset_sUnion_of_mem ⟨isOpen_Ioo, Ioo_subset_Icc_self.trans hxyD⟩
have hyzD : Icc y z ⊆ D := (Icc_subset_Icc_left hxy.le).trans hxzD
have hyzD' : Ioo y z ⊆ interior D :=
subset_sUnion_of_mem ⟨isOpen_Ioo, Ioo_subset_Icc_self.trans hyzD⟩
-- Then we apply MVT to both `[x, y]` and `[y, z]`
obtain ⟨a, ⟨hxa, hay⟩, ha⟩ : ∃ a ∈ Ioo x y, deriv f a = (f y - f x) / (y - x) :=
exists_deriv_eq_slope f hxy (hf.mono hxyD) (hf'.mono hxyD')
obtain ⟨b, ⟨hyb, hbz⟩, hb⟩ : ∃ b ∈ Ioo y z, deriv f b = (f z - f y) / (z - y) :=
exists_deriv_eq_slope f hyz (hf.mono hyzD) (hf'.mono hyzD')
rw [← ha, ← hb]
exact hf'_mono (hxyD' ⟨hxa, hay⟩) (hyzD' ⟨hyb, hbz⟩) (hay.trans hyb).le)
/-- If a function `f` is continuous on a convex set `D ⊆ ℝ`, is differentiable on its interior,
and `f'` is antitone on the interior, then `f` is concave on `D`. -/
theorem AntitoneOn.concaveOn_of_deriv {D : Set ℝ} (hD : Convex ℝ D) {f : ℝ → ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f D) (hf' : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (interior D))
| (h_anti : AntitoneOn (deriv f) (interior D)) : ConcaveOn ℝ D f :=
haveI : MonotoneOn (deriv (-f)) (interior D) := by
simpa only [← deriv.neg] using h_anti.neg
neg_convexOn_iff.mp (this.convexOn_of_deriv hD hf.neg hf'.neg)
theorem StrictMonoOn.exists_slope_lt_deriv_aux {x y : ℝ} {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc x y))
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Deriv.lean | 57 | 62 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.Basic
/-!
# Unbounded lattice homomorphisms
This file defines unbounded lattice homomorphisms. _Bounded_ lattice homomorphisms are defined in
`Mathlib.Order.Hom.BoundedLattice`.
We use the `DFunLike` design, so each type of morphisms has a companion typeclass which is meant to
be satisfied by itself and all stricter types.
## Types of morphisms
* `SupHom`: Maps which preserve `⊔`.
* `InfHom`: Maps which preserve `⊓`.
* `LatticeHom`: Lattice homomorphisms. Maps which preserve `⊔` and `⊓`.
## Typeclasses
* `SupHomClass`
* `InfHomClass`
* `LatticeHomClass`
-/
open Function
variable {F α β γ δ : Type*}
/-- The type of `⊔`-preserving functions from `α` to `β`. -/
structure SupHom (α β : Type*) [Max α] [Max β] where
/-- The underlying function of a `SupHom`.
Do not use this function directly. Instead use the coercion coming from the `FunLike`
instance. -/
toFun : α → β
/-- A `SupHom` preserves suprema.
Do not use this directly. Use `map_sup` instead. -/
map_sup' (a b : α) : toFun (a ⊔ b) = toFun a ⊔ toFun b
/-- The type of `⊓`-preserving functions from `α` to `β`. -/
structure InfHom (α β : Type*) [Min α] [Min β] where
/-- The underlying function of an `InfHom`.
Do not use this function directly. Instead use the coercion coming from the `FunLike`
instance. -/
toFun : α → β
/-- An `InfHom` preserves infima.
Do not use this directly. Use `map_inf` instead. -/
map_inf' (a b : α) : toFun (a ⊓ b) = toFun a ⊓ toFun b
/-- The type of lattice homomorphisms from `α` to `β`. -/
structure LatticeHom (α β : Type*) [Lattice α] [Lattice β] extends SupHom α β where
/-- A `LatticeHom` preserves infima.
Do not use this directly. Use `map_inf` instead. -/
map_inf' (a b : α) : toFun (a ⊓ b) = toFun a ⊓ toFun b
-- TODO: remove this configuration and use the default configuration.
initialize_simps_projections LatticeHom (+toSupHom, -toFun)
section
/-- `SupHomClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of `⊔`-preserving morphisms.
You should extend this class when you extend `SupHom`. -/
class SupHomClass (F α β : Type*) [Max α] [Max β] [FunLike F α β] : Prop where
/-- A `SupHomClass` morphism preserves suprema. -/
map_sup (f : F) (a b : α) : f (a ⊔ b) = f a ⊔ f b
/-- `InfHomClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of `⊓`-preserving morphisms.
You should extend this class when you extend `InfHom`. -/
class InfHomClass (F α β : Type*) [Min α] [Min β] [FunLike F α β] : Prop where
/-- An `InfHomClass` morphism preserves infima. -/
map_inf (f : F) (a b : α) : f (a ⊓ b) = f a ⊓ f b
/-- `LatticeHomClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of lattice morphisms.
You should extend this class when you extend `LatticeHom`. -/
class LatticeHomClass (F α β : Type*) [Lattice α] [Lattice β] [FunLike F α β] : Prop
extends SupHomClass F α β where
/-- A `LatticeHomClass` morphism preserves infima. -/
map_inf (f : F) (a b : α) : f (a ⊓ b) = f a ⊓ f b
end
export SupHomClass (map_sup)
export InfHomClass (map_inf)
attribute [simp] map_sup map_inf
section Hom
variable [FunLike F α β]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) SupHomClass.toOrderHomClass [SemilatticeSup α] [SemilatticeSup β]
[SupHomClass F α β] : OrderHomClass F α β :=
{ ‹SupHomClass F α β› with
map_rel := fun f a b h => by rw [← sup_eq_right, ← map_sup, sup_eq_right.2 h] }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) InfHomClass.toOrderHomClass [SemilatticeInf α] [SemilatticeInf β]
[InfHomClass F α β] : OrderHomClass F α β :=
{ ‹InfHomClass F α β› with
map_rel := fun f a b h => by rw [← inf_eq_left, ← map_inf, inf_eq_left.2 h] }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) LatticeHomClass.toInfHomClass [Lattice α] [Lattice β]
[LatticeHomClass F α β] : InfHomClass F α β :=
{ ‹LatticeHomClass F α β› with }
end Hom
section Equiv
variable [EquivLike F α β]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) OrderIsoClass.toSupHomClass [SemilatticeSup α] [SemilatticeSup β]
[OrderIsoClass F α β] : SupHomClass F α β :=
{ show OrderHomClass F α β from inferInstance with
map_sup := fun f a b =>
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => by simp only [← le_map_inv_iff, sup_le_iff] }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) OrderIsoClass.toInfHomClass [SemilatticeInf α] [SemilatticeInf β]
[OrderIsoClass F α β] : InfHomClass F α β :=
{ show OrderHomClass F α β from inferInstance with
map_inf := fun f a b =>
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun c => by simp only [← map_inv_le_iff, le_inf_iff] }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) OrderIsoClass.toLatticeHomClass [Lattice α] [Lattice β]
[OrderIsoClass F α β] : LatticeHomClass F α β :=
{ OrderIsoClass.toSupHomClass, OrderIsoClass.toInfHomClass with }
end Equiv
section OrderEmbedding
variable [FunLike F α β]
/-- We can regard an injective map preserving binary infima as an order embedding. -/
@[simps! apply]
def orderEmbeddingOfInjective [SemilatticeInf α] [SemilatticeInf β] (f : F) [InfHomClass F α β]
(hf : Injective f) : α ↪o β :=
OrderEmbedding.ofMapLEIff f (fun x y ↦ by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ OrderHomClass.mono f h⟩
rwa [← inf_eq_left, ← hf.eq_iff, map_inf, inf_eq_left])
end OrderEmbedding
variable [FunLike F α β]
instance [Max α] [Max β] [SupHomClass F α β] : CoeTC F (SupHom α β) :=
⟨fun f => ⟨f, map_sup f⟩⟩
instance [Min α] [Min β] [InfHomClass F α β] : CoeTC F (InfHom α β) :=
⟨fun f => ⟨f, map_inf f⟩⟩
instance [Lattice α] [Lattice β] [LatticeHomClass F α β] : CoeTC F (LatticeHom α β) :=
⟨fun f =>
{ toFun := f
map_sup' := map_sup f
map_inf' := map_inf f }⟩
/-! ### Supremum homomorphisms -/
namespace SupHom
variable [Max α]
section Sup
variable [Max β] [Max γ] [Max δ]
instance : FunLike (SupHom α β) α β where
coe := SupHom.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by cases f; cases g; congr
instance : SupHomClass (SupHom α β) α β where
map_sup := SupHom.map_sup'
@[simp] lemma toFun_eq_coe (f : SupHom α β) : f.toFun = f := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_mk (f : α → β) (hf) : ⇑(mk f hf) = f := rfl
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : SupHom α β} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g h
/-- Copy of a `SupHom` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
protected def copy (f : SupHom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : SupHom α β where
toFun := f'
map_sup' := h.symm ▸ f.map_sup'
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (f : SupHom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : ⇑(f.copy f' h) = f' :=
rfl
theorem copy_eq (f : SupHom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : f.copy f' h = f :=
DFunLike.ext' h
variable (α)
/-- `id` as a `SupHom`. -/
protected def id : SupHom α α :=
⟨id, fun _ _ => rfl⟩
instance : Inhabited (SupHom α α) :=
⟨SupHom.id α⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_id : ⇑(SupHom.id α) = id :=
rfl
variable {α}
@[simp]
theorem id_apply (a : α) : SupHom.id α a = a :=
rfl
/-- Composition of `SupHom`s as a `SupHom`. -/
def comp (f : SupHom β γ) (g : SupHom α β) : SupHom α γ where
toFun := f ∘ g
map_sup' a b := by rw [comp_apply, map_sup, map_sup]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp (f : SupHom β γ) (g : SupHom α β) : (f.comp g : α → γ) = f ∘ g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply (f : SupHom β γ) (g : SupHom α β) (a : α) : (f.comp g) a = f (g a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_assoc (f : SupHom γ δ) (g : SupHom β γ) (h : SupHom α β) :
(f.comp g).comp h = f.comp (g.comp h) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem comp_id (f : SupHom α β) : f.comp (SupHom.id α) = f := rfl
@[simp] theorem id_comp (f : SupHom α β) : (SupHom.id β).comp f = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem cancel_right {g₁ g₂ : SupHom β γ} {f : SupHom α β} (hf : Surjective f) :
g₁.comp f = g₂.comp f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
⟨fun h => SupHom.ext <| hf.forall.2 <| DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h, fun h => congr_arg₂ _ h rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem cancel_left {g : SupHom β γ} {f₁ f₂ : SupHom α β} (hg : Injective g) :
g.comp f₁ = g.comp f₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ :=
⟨fun h => SupHom.ext fun a => hg <| by rw [← SupHom.comp_apply, h, SupHom.comp_apply],
congr_arg _⟩
end Sup
variable (α) [SemilatticeSup β]
/-- The constant function as a `SupHom`. -/
def const (b : β) : SupHom α β := ⟨fun _ ↦ b, fun _ _ ↦ (sup_idem _).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_const (b : β) : ⇑(const α b) = Function.const α b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem const_apply (b : β) (a : α) : const α b a = b :=
rfl
variable {α}
instance : Max (SupHom α β) :=
⟨fun f g =>
⟨f ⊔ g, fun a b => by
rw [Pi.sup_apply, map_sup, map_sup]
exact sup_sup_sup_comm _ _ _ _⟩⟩
instance : SemilatticeSup (SupHom α β) :=
(DFunLike.coe_injective.semilatticeSup _) fun _ _ => rfl
instance [Bot β] : Bot (SupHom α β) :=
| ⟨SupHom.const α ⊥⟩
| Mathlib/Order/Hom/Lattice.lean | 295 | 296 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Rename
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Variables
/-!
# Monad operations on `MvPolynomial`
This file defines two monadic operations on `MvPolynomial`. Given `p : MvPolynomial σ R`,
* `MvPolynomial.bind₁` and `MvPolynomial.join₁` operate on the variable type `σ`.
* `MvPolynomial.bind₂` and `MvPolynomial.join₂` operate on the coefficient type `R`.
- `MvPolynomial.bind₁ f φ` with `f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R` and `φ : MvPolynomial σ R`,
is the polynomial `φ(f 1, ..., f i, ...) : MvPolynomial τ R`.
- `MvPolynomial.join₁ φ` with `φ : MvPolynomial (MvPolynomial σ R) R` collapses `φ` to
a `MvPolynomial σ R`, by evaluating `φ` under the map `X f ↦ f` for `f : MvPolynomial σ R`.
In other words, if you have a polynomial `φ` in a set of variables indexed by a polynomial ring,
you evaluate the polynomial in these indexing polynomials.
- `MvPolynomial.bind₂ f φ` with `f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S` and `φ : MvPolynomial σ R`
is the `MvPolynomial σ S` obtained from `φ` by mapping the coefficients of `φ` through `f`
and considering the resulting polynomial as polynomial expression in `MvPolynomial σ R`.
- `MvPolynomial.join₂ φ` with `φ : MvPolynomial σ (MvPolynomial σ R)` collapses `φ` to
a `MvPolynomial σ R`, by considering `φ` as polynomial expression in `MvPolynomial σ R`.
These operations themselves have algebraic structure: `MvPolynomial.bind₁`
and `MvPolynomial.join₁` are algebra homs and
`MvPolynomial.bind₂` and `MvPolynomial.join₂` are ring homs.
They interact in convenient ways with `MvPolynomial.rename`, `MvPolynomial.map`,
`MvPolynomial.vars`, and other polynomial operations.
Indeed, `MvPolynomial.rename` is the "map" operation for the (`bind₁`, `join₁`) pair,
whereas `MvPolynomial.map` is the "map" operation for the other pair.
## Implementation notes
We add a `LawfulMonad` instance for the (`bind₁`, `join₁`) pair.
The second pair cannot be instantiated as a `Monad`,
since it is not a monad in `Type` but in `CommRingCat` (or rather `CommSemiRingCat`).
-/
noncomputable section
namespace MvPolynomial
open Finsupp
variable {σ : Type*} {τ : Type*}
variable {R S T : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [CommSemiring T]
/--
`bind₁` is the "left hand side" bind operation on `MvPolynomial`, operating on the variable type.
Given a polynomial `p : MvPolynomial σ R` and a map `f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R` taking variables
in `p` to polynomials in the variable type `τ`, `bind₁ f p` replaces each variable in `p` with
its value under `f`, producing a new polynomial in `τ`. The coefficient type remains the same.
This operation is an algebra hom.
-/
def bind₁ (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) : MvPolynomial σ R →ₐ[R] MvPolynomial τ R :=
aeval f
/-- `bind₂` is the "right hand side" bind operation on `MvPolynomial`,
operating on the coefficient type.
Given a polynomial `p : MvPolynomial σ R` and
a map `f : R → MvPolynomial σ S` taking coefficients in `p` to polynomials over a new ring `S`,
`bind₂ f p` replaces each coefficient in `p` with its value under `f`,
producing a new polynomial over `S`.
The variable type remains the same. This operation is a ring hom.
-/
def bind₂ (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) : MvPolynomial σ R →+* MvPolynomial σ S :=
eval₂Hom f X
/--
`join₁` is the monadic join operation corresponding to `MvPolynomial.bind₁`. Given a polynomial `p`
with coefficients in `R` whose variables are polynomials in `σ` with coefficients in `R`,
`join₁ p` collapses `p` to a polynomial with variables in `σ` and coefficients in `R`.
This operation is an algebra hom.
-/
def join₁ : MvPolynomial (MvPolynomial σ R) R →ₐ[R] MvPolynomial σ R :=
aeval id
/--
`join₂` is the monadic join operation corresponding to `MvPolynomial.bind₂`. Given a polynomial `p`
with variables in `σ` whose coefficients are polynomials in `σ` with coefficients in `R`,
`join₂ p` collapses `p` to a polynomial with variables in `σ` and coefficients in `R`.
This operation is a ring hom.
-/
def join₂ : MvPolynomial σ (MvPolynomial σ R) →+* MvPolynomial σ R :=
eval₂Hom (RingHom.id _) X
@[simp]
theorem aeval_eq_bind₁ (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) : aeval f = bind₁ f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem eval₂Hom_C_eq_bind₁ (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) : eval₂Hom C f = bind₁ f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem eval₂Hom_eq_bind₂ (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) : eval₂Hom f X = bind₂ f :=
rfl
section
variable (σ R)
@[simp]
theorem aeval_id_eq_join₁ : aeval id = @join₁ σ R _ :=
rfl
theorem eval₂Hom_C_id_eq_join₁ (φ : MvPolynomial (MvPolynomial σ R) R) :
eval₂Hom C id φ = join₁ φ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem eval₂Hom_id_X_eq_join₂ : eval₂Hom (RingHom.id _) X = @join₂ σ R _ :=
rfl
end
-- In this file, we don't want to use these simp lemmas,
-- because we first need to show how these new definitions interact
-- and the proofs fall back on unfolding the definitions and call simp afterwards
attribute [-simp]
aeval_eq_bind₁ eval₂Hom_C_eq_bind₁ eval₂Hom_eq_bind₂ aeval_id_eq_join₁ eval₂Hom_id_X_eq_join₂
@[simp]
theorem bind₁_X_right (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (i : σ) : bind₁ f (X i) = f i :=
aeval_X f i
@[simp]
theorem bind₂_X_right (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) (i : σ) : bind₂ f (X i) = X i :=
eval₂Hom_X' f X i
@[simp]
theorem bind₁_X_left : bind₁ (X : σ → MvPolynomial σ R) = AlgHom.id R _ := by
ext1 i
simp
variable (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R)
theorem bind₁_C_right (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (x) : bind₁ f (C x) = C x := algHom_C _ _
@[simp]
theorem bind₂_C_right (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) (r : R) : bind₂ f (C r) = f r :=
eval₂Hom_C f X r
@[simp]
theorem bind₂_C_left : bind₂ (C : R →+* MvPolynomial σ R) = RingHom.id _ := by ext : 2 <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem bind₂_comp_C (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) : (bind₂ f).comp C = f :=
RingHom.ext <| bind₂_C_right _
@[simp]
theorem join₂_map (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
join₂ (map f φ) = bind₂ f φ := by simp only [join₂, bind₂, eval₂Hom_map_hom, RingHom.id_comp]
@[simp]
theorem join₂_comp_map (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) : join₂.comp (map f) = bind₂ f :=
RingHom.ext <| join₂_map _
theorem aeval_id_rename (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
aeval id (rename f p) = aeval f p := by rw [aeval_rename, Function.id_comp]
@[simp]
theorem join₁_rename (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
join₁ (rename f φ) = bind₁ f φ :=
aeval_id_rename _ _
@[simp]
theorem bind₁_id : bind₁ (@id (MvPolynomial σ R)) = join₁ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bind₂_id : bind₂ (RingHom.id (MvPolynomial σ R)) = join₂ :=
rfl
theorem bind₁_bind₁ {υ : Type*} (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (g : τ → MvPolynomial υ R)
(φ : MvPolynomial σ R) : (bind₁ g) (bind₁ f φ) = bind₁ (fun i => bind₁ g (f i)) φ := by
simp [bind₁, ← comp_aeval]
theorem bind₁_comp_bind₁ {υ : Type*} (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (g : τ → MvPolynomial υ R) :
(bind₁ g).comp (bind₁ f) = bind₁ fun i => bind₁ g (f i) := by
ext1
apply bind₁_bind₁
theorem bind₂_comp_bind₂ (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) (g : S →+* MvPolynomial σ T) :
(bind₂ g).comp (bind₂ f) = bind₂ ((bind₂ g).comp f) := by ext : 2 <;> simp
theorem bind₂_bind₂ (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) (g : S →+* MvPolynomial σ T)
(φ : MvPolynomial σ R) : (bind₂ g) (bind₂ f φ) = bind₂ ((bind₂ g).comp f) φ :=
RingHom.congr_fun (bind₂_comp_bind₂ f g) φ
|
theorem rename_comp_bind₁ {υ : Type*} (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (g : τ → υ) :
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Monad.lean | 199 | 200 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.FullyFaithful
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.EpiMono
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.HomCongr
/-!
# Reflective functors
Basic properties of reflective functors, especially those relating to their essential image.
Note properties of reflective functors relating to limits and colimits are included in
`Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monad.Limits`.
-/
universe v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
noncomputable section
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Adjunction
variable {C : Type u₁} {D : Type u₂} {E : Type u₃}
variable [Category.{v₁} C] [Category.{v₂} D] [Category.{v₃} E]
/--
A functor is *reflective*, or *a reflective inclusion*, if it is fully faithful and right adjoint.
-/
class Reflective (R : D ⥤ C) extends R.Full, R.Faithful where
/-- a choice of a left adjoint to `R` -/
L : C ⥤ D
/-- `R` is a right adjoint -/
adj : L ⊣ R
variable (i : D ⥤ C)
/-- The reflector `C ⥤ D` when `R : D ⥤ C` is reflective. -/
def reflector [Reflective i] : C ⥤ D := Reflective.L (R := i)
/-- The adjunction `reflector i ⊣ i` when `i` is reflective. -/
def reflectorAdjunction [Reflective i] : reflector i ⊣ i := Reflective.adj
instance [Reflective i] : i.IsRightAdjoint := ⟨_, ⟨reflectorAdjunction i⟩⟩
instance [Reflective i] : (reflector i).IsLeftAdjoint := ⟨_, ⟨reflectorAdjunction i⟩⟩
/-- A reflective functor is fully faithful. -/
def Functor.fullyFaithfulOfReflective [Reflective i] : i.FullyFaithful :=
(reflectorAdjunction i).fullyFaithfulROfIsIsoCounit
-- TODO: This holds more generally for idempotent adjunctions, not just reflective adjunctions.
/-- For a reflective functor `i` (with left adjoint `L`), with unit `η`, we have `η_iL = iL η`.
-/
theorem unit_obj_eq_map_unit [Reflective i] (X : C) :
(reflectorAdjunction i).unit.app (i.obj ((reflector i).obj X)) =
i.map ((reflector i).map ((reflectorAdjunction i).unit.app X)) := by
| rw [← cancel_mono (i.map ((reflectorAdjunction i).counit.app ((reflector i).obj X))),
← i.map_comp]
simp
/--
When restricted to objects in `D` given by `i : D ⥤ C`, the unit is an isomorphism. In other words,
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Adjunction/Reflective.lean | 62 | 67 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Topology.Bases
import Mathlib.Topology.Inseparable
import Mathlib.Topology.Compactness.Exterior
/-!
# Alexandrov-discrete topological spaces
This file defines Alexandrov-discrete spaces, aka finitely generated spaces.
A space is Alexandrov-discrete if the (arbitrary) intersection of open sets is open. As such,
the intersection of all neighborhoods of a set is a neighborhood itself. Hence every set has a
minimal neighborhood, which we call the *exterior* of the set.
## Main declarations
* `AlexandrovDiscrete`: Prop-valued typeclass for a topological space to be Alexandrov-discrete
## Notes
The "minimal neighborhood of a set" construction is not named in the literature. We chose the name
"exterior" with analogy to the interior. `interior` and `exterior` have the same properties up to
## TODO
Finite product of Alexandrov-discrete spaces is Alexandrov-discrete.
## Tags
Alexandroff, discrete, finitely generated, fg space
-/
open Filter Set TopologicalSpace Topology
/-- A topological space is **Alexandrov-discrete** or **finitely generated** if the intersection of
a family of open sets is open. -/
class AlexandrovDiscrete (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] : Prop where
/-- The intersection of a family of open sets is an open set. Use `isOpen_sInter` in the root
namespace instead. -/
protected isOpen_sInter : ∀ S : Set (Set α), (∀ s ∈ S, IsOpen s) → IsOpen (⋂₀ S)
variable {ι : Sort*} {κ : ι → Sort*} {α β : Type*}
section
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
instance DiscreteTopology.toAlexandrovDiscrete [DiscreteTopology α] : AlexandrovDiscrete α where
isOpen_sInter _ _ := isOpen_discrete _
instance Finite.toAlexandrovDiscrete [Finite α] : AlexandrovDiscrete α where
isOpen_sInter S := (toFinite S).isOpen_sInter
section AlexandrovDiscrete
variable [AlexandrovDiscrete α] {S : Set (Set α)} {f : ι → Set α}
lemma isOpen_sInter : (∀ s ∈ S, IsOpen s) → IsOpen (⋂₀ S) := AlexandrovDiscrete.isOpen_sInter _
lemma isOpen_iInter (hf : ∀ i, IsOpen (f i)) : IsOpen (⋂ i, f i) :=
isOpen_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
lemma isOpen_iInter₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsOpen (f i j)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i, ⋂ j, f i j) :=
isOpen_iInter fun _ ↦ isOpen_iInter <| hf _
lemma isClosed_sUnion (hS : ∀ s ∈ S, IsClosed s) : IsClosed (⋃₀ S) := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_sUnion] at hS ⊢; exact isOpen_sInter <| forall_mem_image.2 hS
lemma isClosed_iUnion (hf : ∀ i, IsClosed (f i)) : IsClosed (⋃ i, f i) :=
isClosed_sUnion <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
lemma isClosed_iUnion₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsClosed (f i j)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i, ⋃ j, f i j) :=
isClosed_iUnion fun _ ↦ isClosed_iUnion <| hf _
lemma isClopen_sInter (hS : ∀ s ∈ S, IsClopen s) : IsClopen (⋂₀ S) :=
⟨isClosed_sInter fun s hs ↦ (hS s hs).1, isOpen_sInter fun s hs ↦ (hS s hs).2⟩
lemma isClopen_iInter (hf : ∀ i, IsClopen (f i)) : IsClopen (⋂ i, f i) :=
⟨isClosed_iInter fun i ↦ (hf i).1, isOpen_iInter fun i ↦ (hf i).2⟩
lemma isClopen_iInter₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsClopen (f i j)) :
IsClopen (⋂ i, ⋂ j, f i j) :=
isClopen_iInter fun _ ↦ isClopen_iInter <| hf _
lemma isClopen_sUnion (hS : ∀ s ∈ S, IsClopen s) : IsClopen (⋃₀ S) :=
⟨isClosed_sUnion fun s hs ↦ (hS s hs).1, isOpen_sUnion fun s hs ↦ (hS s hs).2⟩
lemma isClopen_iUnion (hf : ∀ i, IsClopen (f i)) : IsClopen (⋃ i, f i) :=
⟨isClosed_iUnion fun i ↦ (hf i).1, isOpen_iUnion fun i ↦ (hf i).2⟩
lemma isClopen_iUnion₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsClopen (f i j)) :
IsClopen (⋃ i, ⋃ j, f i j) :=
isClopen_iUnion fun _ ↦ isClopen_iUnion <| hf _
lemma interior_iInter (f : ι → Set α) : interior (⋂ i, f i) = ⋂ i, interior (f i) :=
(interior_maximal (iInter_mono fun _ ↦ interior_subset) <| isOpen_iInter fun _ ↦
isOpen_interior).antisymm' <| subset_iInter fun _ ↦ interior_mono <| iInter_subset _ _
lemma interior_sInter (S : Set (Set α)) : interior (⋂₀ S) = ⋂ s ∈ S, interior s := by
simp_rw [sInter_eq_biInter, interior_iInter]
lemma closure_iUnion (f : ι → Set α) : closure (⋃ i, f i) = ⋃ i, closure (f i) :=
| compl_injective <| by
simpa only [← interior_compl, compl_iUnion] using interior_iInter fun i ↦ (f i)ᶜ
| Mathlib/Topology/AlexandrovDiscrete.lean | 108 | 110 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.StrongRankCondition
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.AlgebraTower
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Finsupp
/-!
# Rank of free modules
## Main result
- `LinearEquiv.nonempty_equiv_iff_lift_rank_eq`:
Two free modules are isomorphic iff they have the same dimension.
- `Module.finBasis`:
An arbitrary basis of a finite free module indexed by `Fin n` given `finrank R M = n`.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u v v' w
open Cardinal Basis Submodule Function Set Module
section Tower
variable (F : Type u) (K : Type v) (A : Type w)
variable [Semiring F] [Semiring K] [AddCommMonoid A]
variable [Module F K] [Module K A] [Module F A] [IsScalarTower F K A]
variable [StrongRankCondition F] [StrongRankCondition K] [Module.Free F K] [Module.Free K A]
/-- Tower law: if `A` is a `K`-module and `K` is an extension of `F` then
$\operatorname{rank}_F(A) = \operatorname{rank}_F(K) * \operatorname{rank}_K(A)$.
The universe polymorphic version of `rank_mul_rank` below. -/
theorem lift_rank_mul_lift_rank :
Cardinal.lift.{w} (Module.rank F K) * Cardinal.lift.{v} (Module.rank K A) =
Cardinal.lift.{v} (Module.rank F A) := by
let b := Module.Free.chooseBasis F K
let c := Module.Free.chooseBasis K A
rw [← (Module.rank F K).lift_id, ← b.mk_eq_rank, ← (Module.rank K A).lift_id, ← c.mk_eq_rank,
← lift_umax.{w, v}, ← (b.smulTower c).mk_eq_rank, mk_prod, lift_mul, lift_lift, lift_lift,
lift_lift, lift_lift, lift_umax.{v, w}]
/-- Tower law: if `A` is a `K`-module and `K` is an extension of `F` then
$\operatorname{rank}_F(A) = \operatorname{rank}_F(K) * \operatorname{rank}_K(A)$.
This is a simpler version of `lift_rank_mul_lift_rank` with `K` and `A` in the same universe. -/
@[stacks 09G9]
theorem rank_mul_rank (A : Type v) [AddCommMonoid A]
[Module K A] [Module F A] [IsScalarTower F K A] [Module.Free K A] :
Module.rank F K * Module.rank K A = Module.rank F A := by
convert lift_rank_mul_lift_rank F K A <;> rw [lift_id]
/-- Tower law: if `A` is a `K`-module and `K` is an extension of `F` then
$\operatorname{rank}_F(A) = \operatorname{rank}_F(K) * \operatorname{rank}_K(A)$. -/
theorem Module.finrank_mul_finrank : finrank F K * finrank K A = finrank F A := by
simp_rw [finrank]
rw [← toNat_lift.{w} (Module.rank F K), ← toNat_lift.{v} (Module.rank K A), ← toNat_mul,
lift_rank_mul_lift_rank, toNat_lift]
end Tower
variable {R : Type u} {M M₁ : Type v} {M' : Type v'}
variable [Semiring R] [StrongRankCondition R]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [Module.Free R M]
variable [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R M'] [Module.Free R M']
variable [AddCommMonoid M₁] [Module R M₁] [Module.Free R M₁]
namespace Module.Free
variable (R M)
/-- The rank of a free module `M` over `R` is the cardinality of `ChooseBasisIndex R M`. -/
theorem rank_eq_card_chooseBasisIndex : Module.rank R M = #(ChooseBasisIndex R M) :=
(chooseBasis R M).mk_eq_rank''.symm
/-- The finrank of a free module `M` over `R` is the cardinality of `ChooseBasisIndex R M`. -/
theorem _root_.Module.finrank_eq_card_chooseBasisIndex [Module.Finite R M] :
finrank R M = Fintype.card (ChooseBasisIndex R M) := by
simp [finrank, rank_eq_card_chooseBasisIndex]
/-- The rank of a free module `M` over an infinite scalar ring `R` is the cardinality of `M`
whenever `#R < #M`. -/
lemma rank_eq_mk_of_infinite_lt [Infinite R] (h_lt : lift.{v} #R < lift.{u} #M) :
Module.rank R M = #M := by
have : Infinite M := infinite_iff.mpr <| lift_le.mp <| le_trans (by simp) h_lt.le
have h : lift #M = lift #(ChooseBasisIndex R M →₀ R) := lift_mk_eq'.mpr ⟨(chooseBasis R M).repr⟩
simp only [mk_finsupp_lift_of_infinite', lift_id', ← rank_eq_card_chooseBasisIndex, lift_max,
lift_lift] at h
refine lift_inj.mp ((max_eq_iff.mp h.symm).resolve_right <| not_and_of_not_left _ ?_).left
exact (lift_umax.{v, u}.symm ▸ h_lt).ne
end Module.Free
open Module.Free
open Cardinal
/-- Two vector spaces are isomorphic if they have the same dimension. -/
theorem nonempty_linearEquiv_of_lift_rank_eq
(cnd : Cardinal.lift.{v'} (Module.rank R M) = Cardinal.lift.{v} (Module.rank R M')) :
Nonempty (M ≃ₗ[R] M') := by
obtain ⟨⟨α, B⟩⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := R) (M := M)
obtain ⟨⟨β, B'⟩⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := R) (M := M')
have : Cardinal.lift.{v', v} #α = Cardinal.lift.{v, v'} #β := by
| rw [B.mk_eq_rank'', cnd, B'.mk_eq_rank'']
exact (Cardinal.lift_mk_eq.{v, v', 0}.1 this).map (B.equiv B')
/-- Two vector spaces are isomorphic if they have the same dimension. -/
theorem nonempty_linearEquiv_of_rank_eq (cond : Module.rank R M = Module.rank R M₁) :
Nonempty (M ≃ₗ[R] M₁) :=
nonempty_linearEquiv_of_lift_rank_eq <| congr_arg _ cond
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Dimension/Free.lean | 111 | 118 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Kenny Lau, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro, Kevin Buzzard,
Amelia Livingston, Yury Kudryashov, Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subsemigroup.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice.Image
/-!
# Subsemigroups: `CompleteLattice` structure
This file defines a `CompleteLattice` structure on `Subsemigroup`s,
and define the closure of a set as the minimal subsemigroup that includes this set.
## Main definitions
For each of the following definitions in the `Subsemigroup` namespace, there is a corresponding
definition in the `AddSubsemigroup` namespace.
* `Subsemigroup.copy` : copy of a subsemigroup with `carrier` replaced by a set that is equal but
possibly not definitionally equal to the carrier of the original `Subsemigroup`.
* `Subsemigroup.closure` : semigroup closure of a set, i.e.,
the least subsemigroup that includes the set.
* `Subsemigroup.gi` : `closure : Set M → Subsemigroup M` and coercion `coe : Subsemigroup M → Set M`
form a `GaloisInsertion`;
## Implementation notes
Subsemigroup inclusion is denoted `≤` rather than `⊆`, although `∈` is defined as
membership of a subsemigroup's underlying set.
Note that `Subsemigroup M` does not actually require `Semigroup M`,
instead requiring only the weaker `Mul M`.
This file is designed to have very few dependencies. In particular, it should not use natural
numbers.
## Tags
subsemigroup, subsemigroups
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
-- Only needed for notation
variable {M : Type*} {N : Type*}
section NonAssoc
variable [Mul M] {s : Set M}
namespace Subsemigroup
variable (S : Subsemigroup M)
@[to_additive]
instance : InfSet (Subsemigroup M) :=
⟨fun s =>
{ carrier := ⋂ t ∈ s, ↑t
mul_mem' := fun hx hy =>
Set.mem_biInter fun i h =>
i.mul_mem (by apply Set.mem_iInter₂.1 hx i h) (by apply Set.mem_iInter₂.1 hy i h) }⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_sInf (S : Set (Subsemigroup M)) : ((sInf S : Subsemigroup M) : Set M) = ⋂ s ∈ S, ↑s :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_sInf {S : Set (Subsemigroup M)} {x : M} : x ∈ sInf S ↔ ∀ p ∈ S, x ∈ p :=
Set.mem_iInter₂
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_iInf {ι : Sort*} {S : ι → Subsemigroup M} {x : M} : (x ∈ ⨅ i, S i) ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ S i := by
simp only [iInf, mem_sInf, Set.forall_mem_range]
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_iInf {ι : Sort*} {S : ι → Subsemigroup M} : (↑(⨅ i, S i) : Set M) = ⋂ i, S i := by
simp only [iInf, coe_sInf, Set.biInter_range]
/-- subsemigroups of a monoid form a complete lattice. -/
@[to_additive "The `AddSubsemigroup`s of an `AddMonoid` form a complete lattice."]
instance : CompleteLattice (Subsemigroup M) :=
{ completeLatticeOfInf (Subsemigroup M) fun _ =>
IsGLB.of_image SetLike.coe_subset_coe isGLB_biInf with
le := (· ≤ ·)
lt := (· < ·)
bot := ⊥
bot_le := fun _ _ hx => (not_mem_bot hx).elim
top := ⊤
le_top := fun _ x _ => mem_top x
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
sInf := InfSet.sInf
le_inf := fun _ _ _ ha hb _ hx => ⟨ha hx, hb hx⟩
inf_le_left := fun _ _ _ => And.left
inf_le_right := fun _ _ _ => And.right }
/-- The `Subsemigroup` generated by a set. -/
@[to_additive "The `AddSubsemigroup` generated by a set"]
def closure (s : Set M) : Subsemigroup M :=
sInf { S | s ⊆ S }
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_closure {x : M} : x ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ S : Subsemigroup M, s ⊆ S → x ∈ S :=
mem_sInf
/-- The subsemigroup generated by a set includes the set. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp, aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [SetLike]))
"The `AddSubsemigroup` generated by a set includes the set."]
theorem subset_closure : s ⊆ closure s := fun _ hx => mem_closure.2 fun _ hS => hS hx
@[to_additive]
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_closure {P : M} (hP : P ∉ closure s) : P ∉ s := fun h =>
hP (subset_closure h)
variable {S}
open Set
/-- A subsemigroup `S` includes `closure s` if and only if it includes `s`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"An additive subsemigroup `S` includes `closure s` if and only if it includes `s`"]
theorem closure_le : closure s ≤ S ↔ s ⊆ S :=
⟨Subset.trans subset_closure, fun h => sInf_le h⟩
/-- subsemigroup closure of a set is monotone in its argument: if `s ⊆ t`,
then `closure s ≤ closure t`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) "Additive subsemigroup closure of a set is monotone in its argument:
if `s ⊆ t`, then `closure s ≤ closure t`"]
theorem closure_mono ⦃s t : Set M⦄ (h : s ⊆ t) : closure s ≤ closure t :=
closure_le.2 <| Subset.trans h subset_closure
@[to_additive]
theorem closure_eq_of_le (h₁ : s ⊆ S) (h₂ : S ≤ closure s) : closure s = S :=
le_antisymm (closure_le.2 h₁) h₂
variable (S)
/-- An induction principle for closure membership. If `p` holds for all elements of `s`, and
is preserved under multiplication, then `p` holds for all elements of the closure of `s`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim) "An induction principle for additive closure membership. If `p`
holds for all elements of `s`, and is preserved under addition, then `p` holds for all
elements of the additive closure of `s`."]
theorem closure_induction {p : (x : M) → x ∈ closure s → Prop}
(mem : ∀ (x) (h : x ∈ s), p x (subset_closure h))
(mul : ∀ x y hx hy, p x hx → p y hy → p (x * y) (mul_mem hx hy)) {x} (hx : x ∈ closure s) :
p x hx :=
let S : Subsemigroup M :=
{ carrier := { x | ∃ hx, p x hx }
mul_mem' := fun ⟨_, hpx⟩ ⟨_, hpy⟩ ↦ ⟨_, mul _ _ _ _ hpx hpy⟩ }
closure_le (S := S) |>.mpr (fun y hy ↦ ⟨subset_closure hy, mem y hy⟩) hx |>.elim fun _ ↦ id
/-- An induction principle for closure membership for predicates with two arguments. -/
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim) "An induction principle for additive closure membership for
predicates with two arguments."]
theorem closure_induction₂ {p : (x y : M) → x ∈ closure s → y ∈ closure s → Prop}
(mem : ∀ (x) (y) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s), p x y (subset_closure hx) (subset_closure hy))
(mul_left : ∀ x y z hx hy hz, p x z hx hz → p y z hy hz → p (x * y) z (mul_mem hx hy) hz)
(mul_right : ∀ x y z hx hy hz, p z x hz hx → p z y hz hy → p z (x * y) hz (mul_mem hx hy))
{x y : M} (hx : x ∈ closure s) (hy : y ∈ closure s) : p x y hx hy := by
induction hx using closure_induction with
| mem z hz => induction hy using closure_induction with
| mem _ h => exact mem _ _ hz h
| mul _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => exact mul_right _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂
| mul _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => exact mul_left _ _ _ _ _ hy h₁ h₂
/-- If `s` is a dense set in a magma `M`, `Subsemigroup.closure s = ⊤`, then in order to prove that
some predicate `p` holds for all `x : M` it suffices to verify `p x` for `x ∈ s`,
and verify that `p x` and `p y` imply `p (x * y)`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim) "If `s` is a dense set in an additive monoid `M`,
`AddSubsemigroup.closure s = ⊤`, then in order to prove that some predicate `p` holds
for all `x : M` it suffices to verify `p x` for `x ∈ s`, and verify that `p x` and `p y` imply
`p (x + y)`."]
theorem dense_induction {p : M → Prop} (s : Set M) (closure : closure s = ⊤)
(mem : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) (mul : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x * y)) (x : M) :
p x := by
induction closure.symm ▸ mem_top x using closure_induction with
| mem _ h => exact mem _ h
| mul _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => exact mul _ _ h₁ h₂
/- The argument `s : Set M` is explicit in `Subsemigroup.dense_induction` because the type of the
induction variable, namely `x : M`, does not reference `x`. Making `s` explicit allows the user
to apply the induction principle while deferring the proof of `closure s = ⊤` without creating
metavariables, as in the following example. -/
example {p : M → Prop} (s : Set M) (closure : closure s = ⊤)
(mem : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) (mul : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x * y)) (x : M) :
p x := by
induction x using dense_induction s with
| closure => exact closure
| mem x hx => exact mem x hx
| mul _ _ h₁ h₂ => exact mul _ _ h₁ h₂
variable (M)
/-- `closure` forms a Galois insertion with the coercion to set. -/
@[to_additive "`closure` forms a Galois insertion with the coercion to set."]
protected def gi : GaloisInsertion (@closure M _) SetLike.coe :=
GaloisConnection.toGaloisInsertion (fun _ _ => closure_le) fun _ => subset_closure
variable {M}
/-- Closure of a subsemigroup `S` equals `S`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Additive closure of an additive subsemigroup `S` equals `S`"]
theorem closure_eq : closure (S : Set M) = S :=
(Subsemigroup.gi M).l_u_eq S
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem closure_empty : closure (∅ : Set M) = ⊥ :=
(Subsemigroup.gi M).gc.l_bot
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem closure_univ : closure (univ : Set M) = ⊤ :=
@coe_top M _ ▸ closure_eq ⊤
@[to_additive]
theorem closure_union (s t : Set M) : closure (s ∪ t) = closure s ⊔ closure t :=
(Subsemigroup.gi M).gc.l_sup
@[to_additive]
theorem closure_iUnion {ι} (s : ι → Set M) : closure (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, closure (s i) :=
(Subsemigroup.gi M).gc.l_iSup
@[to_additive]
theorem closure_singleton_le_iff_mem (m : M) (p : Subsemigroup M) : closure {m} ≤ p ↔ m ∈ p := by
rw [closure_le, singleton_subset_iff, SetLike.mem_coe]
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_iSup {ι : Sort*} (p : ι → Subsemigroup M) {m : M} :
(m ∈ ⨆ i, p i) ↔ ∀ N, (∀ i, p i ≤ N) → m ∈ N := by
rw [← closure_singleton_le_iff_mem, le_iSup_iff]
simp only [closure_singleton_le_iff_mem]
@[to_additive]
theorem iSup_eq_closure {ι : Sort*} (p : ι → Subsemigroup M) :
⨆ i, p i = Subsemigroup.closure (⋃ i, (p i : Set M)) := by
simp_rw [Subsemigroup.closure_iUnion, Subsemigroup.closure_eq]
end Subsemigroup
namespace MulHom
variable [Mul N]
open Subsemigroup
/-- If two mul homomorphisms are equal on a set, then they are equal on its subsemigroup closure. -/
@[to_additive "If two add homomorphisms are equal on a set,
then they are equal on its additive subsemigroup closure."]
theorem eqOn_closure {f g : M →ₙ* N} {s : Set M} (h : Set.EqOn f g s) :
Set.EqOn f g (closure s) :=
show closure s ≤ f.eqLocus g from closure_le.2 h
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_of_eqOn_dense {s : Set M} (hs : closure s = ⊤) {f g : M →ₙ* N} (h : s.EqOn f g) :
f = g :=
eq_of_eqOn_top <| hs ▸ eqOn_closure h
end MulHom
end NonAssoc
|
section Assoc
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Subsemigroup/Basic.lean | 260 | 261 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Ordmap.Invariants
/-!
# Verification of `Ordnode`
This file uses the invariants defined in `Mathlib.Data.Ordmap.Invariants` to construct `Ordset α`,
a wrapper around `Ordnode α` which includes the correctness invariant of the type. It exposes
parallel operations like `insert` as functions on `Ordset` that do the same thing but bundle the
correctness proofs.
The advantage is that it is possible to, for example, prove that the result of `find` on `insert`
will actually find the element, while `Ordnode` cannot guarantee this if the input tree did not
satisfy the type invariants.
## Main definitions
* `Ordnode.Valid`: The validity predicate for an `Ordnode` subtree.
* `Ordset α`: A well formed set of values of type `α`.
## Implementation notes
Because the `Ordnode` file was ported from Haskell, the correctness invariants of some
of the functions have not been spelled out, and some theorems like
`Ordnode.Valid'.balanceL_aux` show very intricate assumptions on the sizes,
which may need to be revised if it turns out some operations violate these assumptions,
because there is a decent amount of slop in the actual data structure invariants, so the
theorem will go through with multiple choices of assumption.
-/
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Ordnode
section Valid
variable [Preorder α]
/-- The validity predicate for an `Ordnode` subtree. This asserts that the `size` fields are
correct, the tree is balanced, and the elements of the tree are organized according to the
ordering. This version of `Valid` also puts all elements in the tree in the interval `(lo, hi)`. -/
structure Valid' (lo : WithBot α) (t : Ordnode α) (hi : WithTop α) : Prop where
ord : t.Bounded lo hi
sz : t.Sized
bal : t.Balanced
/-- The validity predicate for an `Ordnode` subtree. This asserts that the `size` fields are
correct, the tree is balanced, and the elements of the tree are organized according to the
ordering. -/
def Valid (t : Ordnode α) : Prop :=
Valid' ⊥ t ⊤
theorem Valid'.mono_left {x y : α} (xy : x ≤ y) {t : Ordnode α} {o} (h : Valid' y t o) :
Valid' x t o :=
⟨h.1.mono_left xy, h.2, h.3⟩
theorem Valid'.mono_right {x y : α} (xy : x ≤ y) {t : Ordnode α} {o} (h : Valid' o t x) :
Valid' o t y :=
⟨h.1.mono_right xy, h.2, h.3⟩
theorem Valid'.trans_left {t₁ t₂ : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (h : Bounded t₁ o₁ x)
(H : Valid' x t₂ o₂) : Valid' o₁ t₂ o₂ :=
⟨h.trans_left H.1, H.2, H.3⟩
theorem Valid'.trans_right {t₁ t₂ : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ t₁ x)
(h : Bounded t₂ x o₂) : Valid' o₁ t₁ o₂ :=
⟨H.1.trans_right h, H.2, H.3⟩
theorem Valid'.of_lt {t : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ t o₂) (h₁ : Bounded nil o₁ x)
(h₂ : All (· < x) t) : Valid' o₁ t x :=
⟨H.1.of_lt h₁ h₂, H.2, H.3⟩
theorem Valid'.of_gt {t : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ t o₂) (h₁ : Bounded nil x o₂)
(h₂ : All (· > x) t) : Valid' x t o₂ :=
⟨H.1.of_gt h₁ h₂, H.2, H.3⟩
theorem Valid'.valid {t o₁ o₂} (h : @Valid' α _ o₁ t o₂) : Valid t :=
⟨h.1.weak, h.2, h.3⟩
theorem valid'_nil {o₁ o₂} (h : Bounded nil o₁ o₂) : Valid' o₁ (@nil α) o₂ :=
⟨h, ⟨⟩, ⟨⟩⟩
theorem valid_nil : Valid (@nil α) :=
valid'_nil ⟨⟩
theorem Valid'.node {s l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : BalancedSz (size l) (size r)) (hs : s = size l + size r + 1) :
Valid' o₁ (@node α s l x r) o₂ :=
⟨⟨hl.1, hr.1⟩, ⟨hs, hl.2, hr.2⟩, ⟨H, hl.3, hr.3⟩⟩
theorem Valid'.dual : ∀ {t : Ordnode α} {o₁ o₂}, Valid' o₁ t o₂ → @Valid' αᵒᵈ _ o₂ (dual t) o₁
| .nil, _, _, h => valid'_nil h.1.dual
| .node _ l _ r, _, _, ⟨⟨ol, Or⟩, ⟨rfl, sl, sr⟩, ⟨b, bl, br⟩⟩ =>
let ⟨ol', sl', bl'⟩ := Valid'.dual ⟨ol, sl, bl⟩
let ⟨or', sr', br'⟩ := Valid'.dual ⟨Or, sr, br⟩
⟨⟨or', ol'⟩, ⟨by simp [size_dual, add_comm], sr', sl'⟩,
⟨by rw [size_dual, size_dual]; exact b.symm, br', bl'⟩⟩
theorem Valid'.dual_iff {t : Ordnode α} {o₁ o₂} : Valid' o₁ t o₂ ↔ @Valid' αᵒᵈ _ o₂ (.dual t) o₁ :=
⟨Valid'.dual, fun h => by
have := Valid'.dual h; rwa [dual_dual, OrderDual.Preorder.dual_dual] at this⟩
theorem Valid.dual {t : Ordnode α} : Valid t → @Valid αᵒᵈ _ (.dual t) :=
Valid'.dual
theorem Valid.dual_iff {t : Ordnode α} : Valid t ↔ @Valid αᵒᵈ _ (.dual t) :=
Valid'.dual_iff
theorem Valid'.left {s l x r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (@Ordnode.node α s l x r) o₂) : Valid' o₁ l x :=
⟨H.1.1, H.2.2.1, H.3.2.1⟩
theorem Valid'.right {s l x r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (@Ordnode.node α s l x r) o₂) : Valid' x r o₂ :=
⟨H.1.2, H.2.2.2, H.3.2.2⟩
nonrec theorem Valid.left {s l x r} (H : Valid (@node α s l x r)) : Valid l :=
H.left.valid
nonrec theorem Valid.right {s l x r} (H : Valid (@node α s l x r)) : Valid r :=
H.right.valid
theorem Valid.size_eq {s l x r} (H : Valid (@node α s l x r)) :
size (@node α s l x r) = size l + size r + 1 :=
H.2.1
theorem Valid'.node' {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : BalancedSz (size l) (size r)) : Valid' o₁ (@node' α l x r) o₂ :=
hl.node hr H rfl
theorem valid'_singleton {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (h₁ : Bounded nil o₁ x) (h₂ : Bounded nil x o₂) :
Valid' o₁ (singleton x : Ordnode α) o₂ :=
(valid'_nil h₁).node (valid'_nil h₂) (Or.inl zero_le_one) rfl
theorem valid_singleton {x : α} : Valid (singleton x : Ordnode α) :=
valid'_singleton ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩
theorem Valid'.node3L {l} {x : α} {m} {y : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hm : Valid' x m y)
(hr : Valid' y r o₂) (H1 : BalancedSz (size l) (size m))
(H2 : BalancedSz (size l + size m + 1) (size r)) : Valid' o₁ (@node3L α l x m y r) o₂ :=
(hl.node' hm H1).node' hr H2
theorem Valid'.node3R {l} {x : α} {m} {y : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hm : Valid' x m y)
(hr : Valid' y r o₂) (H1 : BalancedSz (size l) (size m + size r + 1))
(H2 : BalancedSz (size m) (size r)) : Valid' o₁ (@node3R α l x m y r) o₂ :=
hl.node' (hm.node' hr H2) H1
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₁ {a b c d : ℕ} (lr₂ : 3 * (b + c + 1 + d) ≤ 16 * a + 9)
(mr₂ : b + c + 1 ≤ 3 * d) (mm₁ : b ≤ 3 * c) : b < 3 * a + 1 := by omega
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₂ {b c d : ℕ} (mr₂ : b + c + 1 ≤ 3 * d) : c ≤ 3 * d := by omega
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₃ {b c d : ℕ} (mr₁ : 2 * d ≤ b + c + 1) (mm₁ : b ≤ 3 * c) :
d ≤ 3 * c := by omega
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₄ {a b c d : ℕ} (lr₁ : 3 * a ≤ b + c + 1 + d) (mr₂ : b + c + 1 ≤ 3 * d)
(mm₁ : b ≤ 3 * c) : a + b + 1 ≤ 3 * (c + d + 1) := by omega
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₅ {a b c d : ℕ} (lr₂ : 3 * (b + c + 1 + d) ≤ 16 * a + 9)
(mr₁ : 2 * d ≤ b + c + 1) (mm₂ : c ≤ 3 * b) : c + d + 1 ≤ 3 * (a + b + 1) := by omega
theorem Valid'.node4L {l} {x : α} {m} {y : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hm : Valid' x m y)
(hr : Valid' (↑y) r o₂) (Hm : 0 < size m)
(H : size l = 0 ∧ size m = 1 ∧ size r ≤ 1 ∨
0 < size l ∧
ratio * size r ≤ size m ∧
delta * size l ≤ size m + size r ∧
3 * (size m + size r) ≤ 16 * size l + 9 ∧ size m ≤ delta * size r) :
Valid' o₁ (@node4L α l x m y r) o₂ := by
obtain - | ⟨s, ml, z, mr⟩ := m; · cases Hm
suffices
BalancedSz (size l) (size ml) ∧
BalancedSz (size mr) (size r) ∧ BalancedSz (size l + size ml + 1) (size mr + size r + 1) from
Valid'.node' (hl.node' hm.left this.1) (hm.right.node' hr this.2.1) this.2.2
rcases H with (⟨l0, m1, r0⟩ | ⟨l0, mr₁, lr₁, lr₂, mr₂⟩)
· rw [hm.2.size_eq, Nat.succ_inj, add_eq_zero] at m1
rw [l0, m1.1, m1.2]; revert r0; rcases size r with (_ | _ | _) <;>
[decide; decide; (intro r0; unfold BalancedSz delta; omega)]
· rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size r) with r0 | r0
· rw [r0] at mr₂; cases not_le_of_lt Hm mr₂
rw [hm.2.size_eq] at lr₁ lr₂ mr₁ mr₂
by_cases mm : size ml + size mr ≤ 1
· have r1 :=
le_antisymm
((mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans mr₁ (Nat.succ_le_succ mm) : _ ≤ ratio * 1)) r0
rw [r1, add_assoc] at lr₁
have l1 :=
le_antisymm
((mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans lr₁ (add_le_add_right mm 2) : _ ≤ delta * 1))
l0
rw [l1, r1]
revert mm; cases size ml <;> cases size mr <;> intro mm
· decide
· rw [zero_add] at mm; rcases mm with (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩)
decide
· rcases mm with (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩); decide
· rw [Nat.succ_add] at mm; rcases mm with (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩)
rcases hm.3.1.resolve_left mm with ⟨mm₁, mm₂⟩
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size ml) with ml0 | ml0
· rw [ml0, mul_zero, Nat.le_zero] at mm₂
rw [ml0, mm₂] at mm; cases mm (by decide)
have : 2 * size l ≤ size ml + size mr + 1 := by
have := Nat.mul_le_mul_left ratio lr₁
rw [mul_left_comm, mul_add] at this
have := le_trans this (add_le_add_left mr₁ _)
rw [← Nat.succ_mul] at this
exact (mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 this
refine ⟨Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩, Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩, Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· refine (mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans this ?_)
rw [two_mul, Nat.succ_le_iff]
refine add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le ?_ mm₂
simpa using (mul_lt_mul_right ml0).2 (by decide : 1 < 3)
· exact Nat.le_of_lt_succ (Valid'.node4L_lemma₁ lr₂ mr₂ mm₁)
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₂ mr₂
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₃ mr₁ mm₁
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₄ lr₁ mr₂ mm₁
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₅ lr₂ mr₁ mm₂
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₁ {a b c : ℕ} (H2 : 3 * a ≤ b + c) (hb₂ : c ≤ 3 * b) : a ≤ 3 * b := by
omega
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₂ {a b c : ℕ} (H3 : 2 * (b + c) ≤ 9 * a + 3) (h : b < 2 * c) :
b < 3 * a + 1 := by omega
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₃ {a b c : ℕ} (H2 : 3 * a ≤ b + c) (h : b < 2 * c) : a + b < 3 * c := by
omega
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₄ {a b : ℕ} (H3 : 2 * b ≤ 9 * a + 3) : 3 * b ≤ 16 * a + 9 := by
omega
theorem Valid'.rotateL {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H1 : ¬size l + size r ≤ 1) (H2 : delta * size l < size r)
(H3 : 2 * size r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@rotateL α l x r) o₂ := by
obtain - | ⟨rs, rl, rx, rr⟩ := r; · cases H2
rw [hr.2.size_eq, Nat.lt_succ_iff] at H2
rw [hr.2.size_eq] at H3
replace H3 : 2 * (size rl + size rr) ≤ 9 * size l + 3 ∨ size rl + size rr ≤ 2 :=
H3.imp (@Nat.le_of_add_le_add_right _ 2 _) Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ
have H3_0 : size l = 0 → size rl + size rr ≤ 2 := by
intro l0; rw [l0] at H3
exact
(or_iff_right_of_imp fun h => (mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans h (by decide))).1 H3
have H3p : size l > 0 → 2 * (size rl + size rr) ≤ 9 * size l + 3 := fun l0 : 1 ≤ size l =>
(or_iff_left_of_imp <| by omega).1 H3
have ablem : ∀ {a b : ℕ}, 1 ≤ a → a + b ≤ 2 → b ≤ 1 := by omega
have hlp : size l > 0 → ¬size rl + size rr ≤ 1 := fun l0 hb =>
absurd (le_trans (le_trans (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ l0) H2) hb) (by decide)
rw [Ordnode.rotateL_node]; split_ifs with h
· have rr0 : size rr > 0 :=
(mul_lt_mul_left (by decide)).1 (lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.zero_le _) h : ratio * 0 < _)
suffices BalancedSz (size l) (size rl) ∧ BalancedSz (size l + size rl + 1) (size rr) by
exact hl.node3L hr.left hr.right this.1 this.2
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size l) with l0 | l0
· rw [l0]; replace H3 := H3_0 l0
have := hr.3.1
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size rl) with rl0 | rl0
· rw [rl0] at this ⊢
rw [le_antisymm (balancedSz_zero.1 this.symm) rr0]
decide
have rr1 : size rr = 1 := le_antisymm (ablem rl0 H3) rr0
rw [add_comm] at H3
rw [rr1, show size rl = 1 from le_antisymm (ablem rr0 H3) rl0]
decide
replace H3 := H3p l0
rcases hr.3.1.resolve_left (hlp l0) with ⟨_, hb₂⟩
refine ⟨Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩, Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· exact Valid'.rotateL_lemma₁ H2 hb₂
· exact Nat.le_of_lt_succ (Valid'.rotateL_lemma₂ H3 h)
· exact Valid'.rotateL_lemma₃ H2 h
· exact
le_trans hb₂
(Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ <| le_trans (Nat.le_add_left _ _) (Nat.le_add_right _ _))
· rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size rl) with rl0 | rl0
· rw [rl0, not_lt, Nat.le_zero, Nat.mul_eq_zero] at h
replace h := h.resolve_left (by decide)
rw [rl0, h, Nat.le_zero, Nat.mul_eq_zero] at H2
rw [hr.2.size_eq, rl0, h, H2.resolve_left (by decide)] at H1
cases H1 (by decide)
refine hl.node4L hr.left hr.right rl0 ?_
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size l) with l0 | l0
· replace H3 := H3_0 l0
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size rr) with rr0 | rr0
· have := hr.3.1
rw [rr0] at this
exact Or.inl ⟨l0, le_antisymm (balancedSz_zero.1 this) rl0, rr0.symm ▸ zero_le_one⟩
exact Or.inl ⟨l0, le_antisymm (ablem rr0 <| by rwa [add_comm]) rl0, ablem rl0 H3⟩
exact
Or.inr ⟨l0, not_lt.1 h, H2, Valid'.rotateL_lemma₄ (H3p l0), (hr.3.1.resolve_left (hlp l0)).1⟩
theorem Valid'.rotateR {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H1 : ¬size l + size r ≤ 1) (H2 : delta * size r < size l)
(H3 : 2 * size l ≤ 9 * size r + 5 ∨ size l ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@rotateR α l x r) o₂ := by
refine Valid'.dual_iff.2 ?_
rw [dual_rotateR]
refine hr.dual.rotateL hl.dual ?_ ?_ ?_
· rwa [size_dual, size_dual, add_comm]
· rwa [size_dual, size_dual]
· rwa [size_dual, size_dual]
theorem Valid'.balance'_aux {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H₁ : 2 * @size α r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3)
(H₂ : 2 * @size α l ≤ 9 * size r + 5 ∨ size l ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@balance' α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [balance']; split_ifs with h h_1 h_2
· exact hl.node' hr (Or.inl h)
· exact hl.rotateL hr h h_1 H₁
· exact hl.rotateR hr h h_2 H₂
· exact hl.node' hr (Or.inr ⟨not_lt.1 h_2, not_lt.1 h_1⟩)
theorem Valid'.balance'_lemma {α l l' r r'} (H1 : BalancedSz l' r')
(H2 : Nat.dist (@size α l) l' ≤ 1 ∧ size r = r' ∨ Nat.dist (size r) r' ≤ 1 ∧ size l = l') :
2 * @size α r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3 := by
suffices @size α r ≤ 3 * (size l + 1) by omega
rcases H2 with (⟨hl, rfl⟩ | ⟨hr, rfl⟩) <;> rcases H1 with (h | ⟨_, h₂⟩)
· exact le_trans (Nat.le_add_left _ _) (le_trans h (Nat.le_add_left _ _))
· exact
le_trans h₂
(Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ <| le_trans (Nat.dist_tri_right _ _) (Nat.add_le_add_left hl _))
· exact
le_trans (Nat.dist_tri_left' _ _)
(le_trans (add_le_add hr (le_trans (Nat.le_add_left _ _) h)) (by omega))
· rw [Nat.mul_succ]
exact le_trans (Nat.dist_tri_right' _ _) (add_le_add h₂ (le_trans hr (by decide)))
theorem Valid'.balance' {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : ∃ l' r', BalancedSz l' r' ∧
(Nat.dist (size l) l' ≤ 1 ∧ size r = r' ∨ Nat.dist (size r) r' ≤ 1 ∧ size l = l')) :
Valid' o₁ (@balance' α l x r) o₂ :=
let ⟨_, _, H1, H2⟩ := H
Valid'.balance'_aux hl hr (Valid'.balance'_lemma H1 H2) (Valid'.balance'_lemma H1.symm H2.symm)
theorem Valid'.balance {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : ∃ l' r', BalancedSz l' r' ∧
(Nat.dist (size l) l' ≤ 1 ∧ size r = r' ∨ Nat.dist (size r) r' ≤ 1 ∧ size l = l')) :
Valid' o₁ (@balance α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [balance_eq_balance' hl.3 hr.3 hl.2 hr.2]; exact hl.balance' hr H
theorem Valid'.balanceL_aux {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H₁ : size l = 0 → size r ≤ 1) (H₂ : 1 ≤ size l → 1 ≤ size r → size r ≤ delta * size l)
(H₃ : 2 * @size α l ≤ 9 * size r + 5 ∨ size l ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@balanceL α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [balanceL_eq_balance hl.2 hr.2 H₁ H₂, balance_eq_balance' hl.3 hr.3 hl.2 hr.2]
refine hl.balance'_aux hr (Or.inl ?_) H₃
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size r) with r0 | r0
· rw [r0]; exact Nat.zero_le _
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size l) with l0 | l0
· rw [l0]; exact le_trans (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ (H₁ l0)) (by decide)
replace H₂ : _ ≤ 3 * _ := H₂ l0 r0; omega
theorem Valid'.balanceL {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : (∃ l', Raised l' (size l) ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised (size r) r' ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
Valid' o₁ (@balanceL α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [balanceL_eq_balance' hl.3 hr.3 hl.2 hr.2 H]
refine hl.balance' hr ?_
rcases H with (⟨l', e, H⟩ | ⟨r', e, H⟩)
· exact ⟨_, _, H, Or.inl ⟨e.dist_le', rfl⟩⟩
· exact ⟨_, _, H, Or.inr ⟨e.dist_le, rfl⟩⟩
theorem Valid'.balanceR_aux {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H₁ : size r = 0 → size l ≤ 1) (H₂ : 1 ≤ size r → 1 ≤ size l → size l ≤ delta * size r)
(H₃ : 2 * @size α r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@balanceR α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [Valid'.dual_iff, dual_balanceR]
have := hr.dual.balanceL_aux hl.dual
rw [size_dual, size_dual] at this
exact this H₁ H₂ H₃
theorem Valid'.balanceR {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : (∃ l', Raised (size l) l' ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised r' (size r) ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
Valid' o₁ (@balanceR α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [Valid'.dual_iff, dual_balanceR]; exact hr.dual.balanceL hl.dual (balance_sz_dual H)
theorem Valid'.eraseMax_aux {s l x r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (.node s l x r) o₂) :
Valid' o₁ (@eraseMax α (.node' l x r)) ↑(findMax' x r) ∧
size (.node' l x r) = size (eraseMax (.node' l x r)) + 1 := by
have := H.2.eq_node'; rw [this] at H; clear this
induction r generalizing l x o₁ with
| nil => exact ⟨H.left, rfl⟩
| node rs rl rx rr _ IHrr =>
have := H.2.2.2.eq_node'; rw [this] at H ⊢
rcases IHrr H.right with ⟨h, e⟩
refine ⟨Valid'.balanceL H.left h (Or.inr ⟨_, Or.inr e, H.3.1⟩), ?_⟩
rw [eraseMax, size_balanceL H.3.2.1 h.3 H.2.2.1 h.2 (Or.inr ⟨_, Or.inr e, H.3.1⟩)]
rw [size_node, e]; rfl
theorem Valid'.eraseMin_aux {s l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (.node s l x r) o₂) :
Valid' ↑(findMin' l x) (@eraseMin α (.node' l x r)) o₂ ∧
size (.node' l x r) = size (eraseMin (.node' l x r)) + 1 := by
have := H.dual.eraseMax_aux
rwa [← dual_node', size_dual, ← dual_eraseMin, size_dual, ← Valid'.dual_iff, findMax'_dual]
at this
theorem eraseMin.valid : ∀ {t}, @Valid α _ t → Valid (eraseMin t)
| nil, _ => valid_nil
| node _ l x r, h => by rw [h.2.eq_node']; exact h.eraseMin_aux.1.valid
theorem eraseMax.valid {t} (h : @Valid α _ t) : Valid (eraseMax t) := by
rw [Valid.dual_iff, dual_eraseMax]; exact eraseMin.valid h.dual
theorem Valid'.glue_aux {l r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l o₂) (hr : Valid' o₁ r o₂)
(sep : l.All fun x => r.All fun y => x < y) (bal : BalancedSz (size l) (size r)) :
Valid' o₁ (@glue α l r) o₂ ∧ size (glue l r) = size l + size r := by
obtain - | ⟨ls, ll, lx, lr⟩ := l; · exact ⟨hr, (zero_add _).symm⟩
obtain - | ⟨rs, rl, rx, rr⟩ := r; · exact ⟨hl, rfl⟩
dsimp [glue]; split_ifs
· rw [splitMax_eq]
· obtain ⟨v, e⟩ := Valid'.eraseMax_aux hl
suffices H : _ by
refine ⟨Valid'.balanceR v (hr.of_gt ?_ ?_) H, ?_⟩
· refine findMax'_all (P := fun a : α => Bounded nil (a : WithTop α) o₂)
lx lr hl.1.2.to_nil (sep.2.2.imp ?_)
exact fun x h => hr.1.2.to_nil.mono_left (le_of_lt h.2.1)
· exact @findMax'_all _ (fun a => All (· > a) (.node rs rl rx rr)) lx lr sep.2.1 sep.2.2
· rw [size_balanceR v.3 hr.3 v.2 hr.2 H, add_right_comm, ← e, hl.2.1]; rfl
refine Or.inl ⟨_, Or.inr e, ?_⟩
rwa [hl.2.eq_node'] at bal
· rw [splitMin_eq]
· obtain ⟨v, e⟩ := Valid'.eraseMin_aux hr
suffices H : _ by
refine ⟨Valid'.balanceL (hl.of_lt ?_ ?_) v H, ?_⟩
· refine @findMin'_all (P := fun a : α => Bounded nil o₁ (a : WithBot α))
_ rl rx (sep.2.1.1.imp ?_) hr.1.1.to_nil
exact fun y h => hl.1.1.to_nil.mono_right (le_of_lt h)
· exact
@findMin'_all _ (fun a => All (· < a) (.node ls ll lx lr)) rl rx
(all_iff_forall.2 fun x hx => sep.imp fun y hy => all_iff_forall.1 hy.1 _ hx)
(sep.imp fun y hy => hy.2.1)
· rw [size_balanceL hl.3 v.3 hl.2 v.2 H, add_assoc, ← e, hr.2.1]; rfl
refine Or.inr ⟨_, Or.inr e, ?_⟩
rwa [hr.2.eq_node'] at bal
theorem Valid'.glue {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂) :
BalancedSz (size l) (size r) →
Valid' o₁ (@glue α l r) o₂ ∧ size (@glue α l r) = size l + size r :=
Valid'.glue_aux (hl.trans_right hr.1) (hr.trans_left hl.1) (hl.1.to_sep hr.1)
theorem Valid'.merge_lemma {a b c : ℕ} (h₁ : 3 * a < b + c + 1) (h₂ : b ≤ 3 * c) :
2 * (a + b) ≤ 9 * c + 5 := by omega
theorem Valid'.merge_aux₁ {o₁ o₂ ls ll lx lr rs rl rx rr t}
(hl : Valid' o₁ (@Ordnode.node α ls ll lx lr) o₂) (hr : Valid' o₁ (.node rs rl rx rr) o₂)
(h : delta * ls < rs) (v : Valid' o₁ t rx) (e : size t = ls + size rl) :
Valid' o₁ (.balanceL t rx rr) o₂ ∧ size (.balanceL t rx rr) = ls + rs := by
rw [hl.2.1] at e
rw [hl.2.1, hr.2.1, delta] at h
rcases hr.3.1 with (H | ⟨hr₁, hr₂⟩); · omega
suffices H₂ : _ by
suffices H₁ : _ by
refine ⟨Valid'.balanceL_aux v hr.right H₁ H₂ ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [e]; exact Or.inl (Valid'.merge_lemma h hr₁)
· rw [balanceL_eq_balance v.2 hr.2.2.2 H₁ H₂, balance_eq_balance' v.3 hr.3.2.2 v.2 hr.2.2.2,
size_balance' v.2 hr.2.2.2, e, hl.2.1, hr.2.1]
abel
· rw [e, add_right_comm]; rintro ⟨⟩
intro _ _; rw [e]; unfold delta at hr₂ ⊢; omega
theorem Valid'.merge_aux {l r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l o₂) (hr : Valid' o₁ r o₂)
(sep : l.All fun x => r.All fun y => x < y) :
Valid' o₁ (@merge α l r) o₂ ∧ size (merge l r) = size l + size r := by
induction l generalizing o₁ o₂ r with
| nil => exact ⟨hr, (zero_add _).symm⟩
| node ls ll lx lr _ IHlr => ?_
induction r generalizing o₁ o₂ with
| nil => exact ⟨hl, rfl⟩
| node rs rl rx rr IHrl _ => ?_
rw [merge_node]; split_ifs with h h_1
· obtain ⟨v, e⟩ := IHrl (hl.of_lt hr.1.1.to_nil <| sep.imp fun x h => h.2.1) hr.left
(sep.imp fun x h => h.1)
exact Valid'.merge_aux₁ hl hr h v e
· obtain ⟨v, e⟩ := IHlr hl.right (hr.of_gt hl.1.2.to_nil sep.2.1) sep.2.2
have := Valid'.merge_aux₁ hr.dual hl.dual h_1 v.dual
rw [size_dual, add_comm, size_dual, ← dual_balanceR, ← Valid'.dual_iff, size_dual,
add_comm rs] at this
exact this e
· refine Valid'.glue_aux hl hr sep (Or.inr ⟨not_lt.1 h_1, not_lt.1 h⟩)
theorem Valid.merge {l r} (hl : Valid l) (hr : Valid r)
(sep : l.All fun x => r.All fun y => x < y) : Valid (@merge α l r) :=
(Valid'.merge_aux hl hr sep).1
theorem insertWith.valid_aux [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α] (f : α → α) (x : α)
(hf : ∀ y, x ≤ y ∧ y ≤ x → x ≤ f y ∧ f y ≤ x) :
∀ {t o₁ o₂},
Valid' o₁ t o₂ →
Bounded nil o₁ x →
Bounded nil x o₂ →
Valid' o₁ (insertWith f x t) o₂ ∧ Raised (size t) (size (insertWith f x t))
| nil, _, _, _, bl, br => ⟨valid'_singleton bl br, Or.inr rfl⟩
| node sz l y r, o₁, o₂, h, bl, br => by
rw [insertWith, cmpLE]
split_ifs with h_1 h_2 <;> dsimp only
· rcases h with ⟨⟨lx, xr⟩, hs, hb⟩
rcases hf _ ⟨h_1, h_2⟩ with ⟨xf, fx⟩
refine
⟨⟨⟨lx.mono_right (le_trans h_2 xf), xr.mono_left (le_trans fx h_1)⟩, hs, hb⟩, Or.inl rfl⟩
· rcases insertWith.valid_aux f x hf h.left bl (lt_of_le_not_le h_1 h_2) with ⟨vl, e⟩
suffices H : _ by
refine ⟨vl.balanceL h.right H, ?_⟩
rw [size_balanceL vl.3 h.3.2.2 vl.2 h.2.2.2 H, h.2.size_eq]
exact (e.add_right _).add_right _
exact Or.inl ⟨_, e, h.3.1⟩
· have : y < x := lt_of_le_not_le ((total_of (· ≤ ·) _ _).resolve_left h_1) h_1
rcases insertWith.valid_aux f x hf h.right this br with ⟨vr, e⟩
suffices H : _ by
refine ⟨h.left.balanceR vr H, ?_⟩
rw [size_balanceR h.3.2.1 vr.3 h.2.2.1 vr.2 H, h.2.size_eq]
exact (e.add_left _).add_right _
exact Or.inr ⟨_, e, h.3.1⟩
theorem insertWith.valid [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α] (f : α → α) (x : α)
(hf : ∀ y, x ≤ y ∧ y ≤ x → x ≤ f y ∧ f y ≤ x) {t} (h : Valid t) : Valid (insertWith f x t) :=
(insertWith.valid_aux _ _ hf h ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩).1
theorem insert_eq_insertWith [DecidableLE α] (x : α) :
∀ t, Ordnode.insert x t = insertWith (fun _ => x) x t
| nil => rfl
| node _ l y r => by
unfold Ordnode.insert insertWith; cases cmpLE x y <;> simp [insert_eq_insertWith]
theorem insert.valid [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α] (x : α) {t} (h : Valid t) :
Valid (Ordnode.insert x t) := by
rw [insert_eq_insertWith]; exact insertWith.valid _ _ (fun _ _ => ⟨le_rfl, le_rfl⟩) h
theorem insert'_eq_insertWith [DecidableLE α] (x : α) :
∀ t, insert' x t = insertWith id x t
| nil => rfl
| node _ l y r => by
unfold insert' insertWith; cases cmpLE x y <;> simp [insert'_eq_insertWith]
theorem insert'.valid [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α]
(x : α) {t} (h : Valid t) : Valid (insert' x t) := by
rw [insert'_eq_insertWith]; exact insertWith.valid _ _ (fun _ => id) h
theorem Valid'.map_aux {β} [Preorder β] {f : α → β} (f_strict_mono : StrictMono f) {t a₁ a₂}
(h : Valid' a₁ t a₂) :
Valid' (Option.map f a₁) (map f t) (Option.map f a₂) ∧ (map f t).size = t.size := by
induction t generalizing a₁ a₂ with
| nil =>
simp only [map, size_nil, and_true]; apply valid'_nil
cases a₁; · trivial
cases a₂; · trivial
simp only [Option.map, Bounded]
exact f_strict_mono h.ord
| node _ _ _ _ t_ih_l t_ih_r =>
have t_ih_l' := t_ih_l h.left
have t_ih_r' := t_ih_r h.right
clear t_ih_l t_ih_r
obtain ⟨t_l_valid, t_l_size⟩ := t_ih_l'
obtain ⟨t_r_valid, t_r_size⟩ := t_ih_r'
simp only [map, size_node, and_true]
constructor
· exact And.intro t_l_valid.ord t_r_valid.ord
· constructor
· rw [t_l_size, t_r_size]; exact h.sz.1
· constructor
· exact t_l_valid.sz
· exact t_r_valid.sz
· constructor
· rw [t_l_size, t_r_size]; exact h.bal.1
· constructor
· exact t_l_valid.bal
· exact t_r_valid.bal
theorem map.valid {β} [Preorder β] {f : α → β} (f_strict_mono : StrictMono f) {t} (h : Valid t) :
Valid (map f t) :=
(Valid'.map_aux f_strict_mono h).1
theorem Valid'.erase_aux [DecidableLE α] (x : α) {t a₁ a₂} (h : Valid' a₁ t a₂) :
Valid' a₁ (erase x t) a₂ ∧ Raised (erase x t).size t.size := by
induction t generalizing a₁ a₂ with
| nil =>
simpa [erase, Raised]
| node _ t_l t_x t_r t_ih_l t_ih_r =>
simp only [erase, size_node]
have t_ih_l' := t_ih_l h.left
have t_ih_r' := t_ih_r h.right
clear t_ih_l t_ih_r
obtain ⟨t_l_valid, t_l_size⟩ := t_ih_l'
obtain ⟨t_r_valid, t_r_size⟩ := t_ih_r'
cases cmpLE x t_x <;> rw [h.sz.1]
· suffices h_balanceable : _ by
constructor
· exact Valid'.balanceR t_l_valid h.right h_balanceable
· rw [size_balanceR t_l_valid.bal h.right.bal t_l_valid.sz h.right.sz h_balanceable]
repeat apply Raised.add_right
exact t_l_size
left; exists t_l.size; exact And.intro t_l_size h.bal.1
· have h_glue := Valid'.glue h.left h.right h.bal.1
obtain ⟨h_glue_valid, h_glue_sized⟩ := h_glue
constructor
· exact h_glue_valid
· right; rw [h_glue_sized]
· suffices h_balanceable : _ by
constructor
· exact Valid'.balanceL h.left t_r_valid h_balanceable
· rw [size_balanceL h.left.bal t_r_valid.bal h.left.sz t_r_valid.sz h_balanceable]
apply Raised.add_right
apply Raised.add_left
exact t_r_size
right; exists t_r.size; exact And.intro t_r_size h.bal.1
theorem erase.valid [DecidableLE α] (x : α) {t} (h : Valid t) : Valid (erase x t) :=
(Valid'.erase_aux x h).1
theorem size_erase_of_mem [DecidableLE α] {x : α} {t a₁ a₂} (h : Valid' a₁ t a₂)
(h_mem : x ∈ t) : size (erase x t) = size t - 1 := by
induction t generalizing a₁ a₂ with
| nil =>
contradiction
| node _ t_l t_x t_r t_ih_l t_ih_r =>
have t_ih_l' := t_ih_l h.left
have t_ih_r' := t_ih_r h.right
clear t_ih_l t_ih_r
dsimp only [Membership.mem, mem] at h_mem
unfold erase
revert h_mem; cases cmpLE x t_x <;> intro h_mem <;> dsimp only at h_mem ⊢
· have t_ih_l := t_ih_l' h_mem
clear t_ih_l' t_ih_r'
have t_l_h := Valid'.erase_aux x h.left
obtain ⟨t_l_valid, t_l_size⟩ := t_l_h
rw [size_balanceR t_l_valid.bal h.right.bal t_l_valid.sz h.right.sz
(Or.inl (Exists.intro t_l.size (And.intro t_l_size h.bal.1)))]
rw [t_ih_l, h.sz.1]
have h_pos_t_l_size := pos_size_of_mem h.left.sz h_mem
revert h_pos_t_l_size; rcases t_l.size with - | t_l_size <;> intro h_pos_t_l_size
· cases h_pos_t_l_size
· simp [Nat.add_right_comm]
· rw [(Valid'.glue h.left h.right h.bal.1).2, h.sz.1]; rfl
· have t_ih_r := t_ih_r' h_mem
clear t_ih_l' t_ih_r'
have t_r_h := Valid'.erase_aux x h.right
obtain ⟨t_r_valid, t_r_size⟩ := t_r_h
rw [size_balanceL h.left.bal t_r_valid.bal h.left.sz t_r_valid.sz
(Or.inr (Exists.intro t_r.size (And.intro t_r_size h.bal.1)))]
rw [t_ih_r, h.sz.1]
have h_pos_t_r_size := pos_size_of_mem h.right.sz h_mem
revert h_pos_t_r_size; rcases t_r.size with - | t_r_size <;> intro h_pos_t_r_size
· cases h_pos_t_r_size
· simp [Nat.add_assoc]
end Valid
end Ordnode
/-- An `Ordset α` is a finite set of values, represented as a tree. The operations on this type
maintain that the tree is balanced and correctly stores subtree sizes at each level. The
correctness property of the tree is baked into the type, so all operations on this type are correct
by construction. -/
def Ordset (α : Type*) [Preorder α] :=
{ t : Ordnode α // t.Valid }
namespace Ordset
open Ordnode
variable [Preorder α]
/-- O(1). The empty set. -/
nonrec def nil : Ordset α :=
⟨nil, ⟨⟩, ⟨⟩, ⟨⟩⟩
/-- O(1). Get the size of the set. -/
def size (s : Ordset α) : ℕ :=
s.1.size
/-- O(1). Construct a singleton set containing value `a`. -/
protected def singleton (a : α) : Ordset α :=
⟨singleton a, valid_singleton⟩
instance instEmptyCollection : EmptyCollection (Ordset α) :=
⟨nil⟩
instance instInhabited : Inhabited (Ordset α) :=
⟨nil⟩
instance instSingleton : Singleton α (Ordset α) :=
⟨Ordset.singleton⟩
/-- O(1). Is the set empty? -/
def Empty (s : Ordset α) : Prop :=
s = ∅
theorem empty_iff {s : Ordset α} : s = ∅ ↔ s.1.empty :=
⟨fun h => by cases h; exact rfl,
fun h => by cases s with | mk s_val _ => cases s_val <;> [rfl; cases h]⟩
instance Empty.instDecidablePred : DecidablePred (@Empty α _) :=
fun _ => decidable_of_iff' _ empty_iff
/-- O(log n). Insert an element into the set, preserving balance and the BST property.
If an equivalent element is already in the set, this replaces it. -/
protected def insert [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α] (x : α) (s : Ordset α) :
Ordset α :=
⟨Ordnode.insert x s.1, insert.valid _ s.2⟩
instance instInsert [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α] : Insert α (Ordset α) :=
⟨Ordset.insert⟩
/-- O(log n). Insert an element into the set, preserving balance and the BST property.
If an equivalent element is already in the set, the set is returned as is. -/
nonrec def insert' [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α] (x : α) (s : Ordset α) :
Ordset α :=
⟨insert' x s.1, insert'.valid _ s.2⟩
section
variable [DecidableLE α]
/-- O(log n). Does the set contain the element `x`? That is,
is there an element that is equivalent to `x` in the order? -/
def mem (x : α) (s : Ordset α) : Bool :=
x ∈ s.val
/-- O(log n). Retrieve an element in the set that is equivalent to `x` in the order,
if it exists. -/
def find (x : α) (s : Ordset α) : Option α :=
Ordnode.find x s.val
instance instMembership : Membership α (Ordset α) :=
⟨fun s x => mem x s⟩
instance mem.decidable (x : α) (s : Ordset α) : Decidable (x ∈ s) :=
instDecidableEqBool _ _
theorem pos_size_of_mem {x : α} {t : Ordset α} (h_mem : x ∈ t) : 0 < size t := by
simp? [Membership.mem, mem] at h_mem says
simp only [Membership.mem, mem, Bool.decide_eq_true] at h_mem
apply Ordnode.pos_size_of_mem t.property.sz h_mem
end
/-- O(log n). Remove an element from the set equivalent to `x`. Does nothing if there
is no such element. -/
def erase [DecidableLE α] (x : α) (s : Ordset α) : Ordset α :=
⟨Ordnode.erase x s.val, Ordnode.erase.valid x s.property⟩
/-- O(n). Map a function across a tree, without changing the structure. -/
def map {β} [Preorder β] (f : α → β) (f_strict_mono : StrictMono f) (s : Ordset α) : Ordset β :=
⟨Ordnode.map f s.val, Ordnode.map.valid f_strict_mono s.property⟩
end Ordset
| Mathlib/Data/Ordmap/Ordset.lean | 911 | 914 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Process.Filtration
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Discrete
/-!
# Adapted and progressively measurable processes
This file defines some standard definition from the theory of stochastic processes including
filtrations and stopping times. These definitions are used to model the amount of information
at a specific time and are the first step in formalizing stochastic processes.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.Adapted`: a sequence of functions `u` is said to be adapted to a
filtration `f` if at each point in time `i`, `u i` is `f i`-strongly measurable
* `MeasureTheory.ProgMeasurable`: a sequence of functions `u` is said to be progressively
measurable with respect to a filtration `f` if at each point in time `i`, `u` restricted to
`Set.Iic i × Ω` is strongly measurable with respect to the product `MeasurableSpace` structure
where the σ-algebra used for `Ω` is `f i`.
## Main results
* `Adapted.progMeasurable_of_continuous`: a continuous adapted process is progressively measurable.
## Tags
adapted, progressively measurable
-/
open Filter Order TopologicalSpace
open scoped MeasureTheory NNReal ENNReal Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {Ω β ι : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace Ω} [TopologicalSpace β] [Preorder ι]
{u v : ι → Ω → β} {f : Filtration ι m}
/-- A sequence of functions `u` is adapted to a filtration `f` if for all `i`,
`u i` is `f i`-measurable. -/
def Adapted (f : Filtration ι m) (u : ι → Ω → β) : Prop :=
∀ i : ι, StronglyMeasurable[f i] (u i)
namespace Adapted
@[to_additive]
protected theorem mul [Mul β] [ContinuousMul β] (hu : Adapted f u) (hv : Adapted f v) :
Adapted f (u * v) := fun i => (hu i).mul (hv i)
@[to_additive]
protected theorem div [Div β] [ContinuousDiv β] (hu : Adapted f u) (hv : Adapted f v) :
Adapted f (u / v) := fun i => (hu i).div (hv i)
@[to_additive]
protected theorem inv [Group β] [IsTopologicalGroup β] (hu : Adapted f u) :
Adapted f u⁻¹ := fun i => (hu i).inv
protected theorem smul [SMul ℝ β] [ContinuousSMul ℝ β] (c : ℝ) (hu : Adapted f u) :
Adapted f (c • u) := fun i => (hu i).const_smul c
protected theorem stronglyMeasurable {i : ι} (hf : Adapted f u) : StronglyMeasurable[m] (u i) :=
(hf i).mono (f.le i)
theorem stronglyMeasurable_le {i j : ι} (hf : Adapted f u) (hij : i ≤ j) :
StronglyMeasurable[f j] (u i) := (hf i).mono (f.mono hij)
end Adapted
theorem adapted_const (f : Filtration ι m) (x : β) : Adapted f fun _ _ => x := fun _ =>
stronglyMeasurable_const
variable (β) in
theorem adapted_zero [Zero β] (f : Filtration ι m) : Adapted f (0 : ι → Ω → β) := fun i =>
@stronglyMeasurable_zero Ω β (f i) _ _
theorem Filtration.adapted_natural [MetrizableSpace β] [mβ : MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β]
{u : ι → Ω → β} (hum : ∀ i, StronglyMeasurable[m] (u i)) :
Adapted (Filtration.natural u hum) u := by
intro i
refine StronglyMeasurable.mono ?_ (le_iSup₂_of_le i (le_refl i) le_rfl)
rw [stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable]
exact ⟨measurable_iff_comap_le.2 le_rfl, (hum i).isSeparable_range⟩
/-- Progressively measurable process. A sequence of functions `u` is said to be progressively
measurable with respect to a filtration `f` if at each point in time `i`, `u` restricted to
`Set.Iic i × Ω` is measurable with respect to the product `MeasurableSpace` structure where the
σ-algebra used for `Ω` is `f i`.
The usual definition uses the interval `[0,i]`, which we replace by `Set.Iic i`. We recover the
usual definition for index types `ℝ≥0` or `ℕ`. -/
def ProgMeasurable [MeasurableSpace ι] (f : Filtration ι m) (u : ι → Ω → β) : Prop :=
∀ i, StronglyMeasurable[Subtype.instMeasurableSpace.prod (f i)] fun p : Set.Iic i × Ω => u p.1 p.2
theorem progMeasurable_const [MeasurableSpace ι] (f : Filtration ι m) (b : β) :
ProgMeasurable f (fun _ _ => b : ι → Ω → β) := fun i =>
@stronglyMeasurable_const _ _ (Subtype.instMeasurableSpace.prod (f i)) _ _
namespace ProgMeasurable
variable [MeasurableSpace ι]
protected theorem adapted (h : ProgMeasurable f u) : Adapted f u := by
intro i
have : u i = (fun p : Set.Iic i × Ω => u p.1 p.2) ∘ fun x => (⟨i, Set.mem_Iic.mpr le_rfl⟩, x) :=
rfl
rw [this]
exact (h i).comp_measurable measurable_prodMk_left
protected theorem comp {t : ι → Ω → ι} [TopologicalSpace ι] [BorelSpace ι] [MetrizableSpace ι]
(h : ProgMeasurable f u) (ht : ProgMeasurable f t) (ht_le : ∀ i ω, t i ω ≤ i) :
ProgMeasurable f fun i ω => u (t i ω) ω := by
intro i
have : (fun p : ↥(Set.Iic i) × Ω => u (t (p.fst : ι) p.snd) p.snd) =
(fun p : ↥(Set.Iic i) × Ω => u (p.fst : ι) p.snd) ∘ fun p : ↥(Set.Iic i) × Ω =>
(⟨t (p.fst : ι) p.snd, Set.mem_Iic.mpr ((ht_le _ _).trans p.fst.prop)⟩, p.snd) := rfl
rw [this]
exact (h i).comp_measurable ((ht i).measurable.subtype_mk.prodMk measurable_snd)
section Arithmetic
@[to_additive]
| protected theorem mul [Mul β] [ContinuousMul β] (hu : ProgMeasurable f u)
(hv : ProgMeasurable f v) : ProgMeasurable f fun i ω => u i ω * v i ω := fun i =>
(hu i).mul (hv i)
@[to_additive]
protected theorem finset_prod' {γ} [CommMonoid β] [ContinuousMul β] {U : γ → ι → Ω → β}
| Mathlib/Probability/Process/Adapted.lean | 127 | 132 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Charpoly.Coeff
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.ToLin
/-!
# Cayley-Hamilton theorem for f.g. modules.
Given a fixed finite spanning set `b : ι → M` of an `R`-module `M`, we say that a matrix `M`
represents an endomorphism `f : M →ₗ[R] M` if the matrix as an endomorphism of `ι → R` commutes
with `f` via the projection `(ι → R) →ₗ[R] M` given by `b`.
We show that every endomorphism has a matrix representation, and if `f.range ≤ I • ⊤` for some
ideal `I`, we may furthermore obtain a matrix representation whose entries fall in `I`.
This is used to conclude the Cayley-Hamilton theorem for f.g. modules over arbitrary rings.
-/
variable {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [Module R M] (I : Ideal R)
variable (b : ι → M)
open Polynomial Matrix
/-- The composition of a matrix (as an endomorphism of `ι → R`) with the projection
`(ι → R) →ₗ[R] M`. -/
def PiToModule.fromMatrix [DecidableEq ι] : Matrix ι ι R →ₗ[R] (ι → R) →ₗ[R] M :=
(LinearMap.llcomp R _ _ _ (Fintype.linearCombination R b)).comp algEquivMatrix'.symm.toLinearMap
theorem PiToModule.fromMatrix_apply [DecidableEq ι] (A : Matrix ι ι R) (w : ι → R) :
PiToModule.fromMatrix R b A w = Fintype.linearCombination R b (A *ᵥ w) :=
rfl
theorem PiToModule.fromMatrix_apply_single_one [DecidableEq ι] (A : Matrix ι ι R) (j : ι) :
PiToModule.fromMatrix R b A (Pi.single j 1) = ∑ i : ι, A i j • b i := by
rw [PiToModule.fromMatrix_apply, Fintype.linearCombination_apply, Matrix.mulVec_single]
simp_rw [MulOpposite.op_one, one_smul, transpose_apply]
/-- The endomorphisms of `M` acts on `(ι → R) →ₗ[R] M`, and takes the projection
to a `(ι → R) →ₗ[R] M`. -/
def PiToModule.fromEnd : Module.End R M →ₗ[R] (ι → R) →ₗ[R] M :=
LinearMap.lcomp _ _ (Fintype.linearCombination R b)
theorem PiToModule.fromEnd_apply (f : Module.End R M) (w : ι → R) :
PiToModule.fromEnd R b f w = f (Fintype.linearCombination R b w) :=
rfl
theorem PiToModule.fromEnd_apply_single_one [DecidableEq ι] (f : Module.End R M) (i : ι) :
PiToModule.fromEnd R b f (Pi.single i 1) = f (b i) := by
rw [PiToModule.fromEnd_apply, Fintype.linearCombination_apply_single, one_smul]
theorem PiToModule.fromEnd_injective (hb : Submodule.span R (Set.range b) = ⊤) :
Function.Injective (PiToModule.fromEnd R b) := by
intro x y e
ext m
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ : m ∈ LinearMap.range (Fintype.linearCombination R b) := by
rw [(Fintype.range_linearCombination R b).trans hb]
exact Submodule.mem_top
exact (LinearMap.congr_fun e m :)
section
variable {R} [DecidableEq ι]
/-- We say that a matrix represents an endomorphism of `M` if the matrix acting on `ι → R` is
equal to `f` via the projection `(ι → R) →ₗ[R] M` given by a fixed (spanning) set. -/
def Matrix.Represents (A : Matrix ι ι R) (f : Module.End R M) : Prop :=
PiToModule.fromMatrix R b A = PiToModule.fromEnd R b f
variable {b}
theorem Matrix.Represents.congr_fun {A : Matrix ι ι R} {f : Module.End R M} (h : A.Represents b f)
(x) : Fintype.linearCombination R b (A *ᵥ x) = f (Fintype.linearCombination R b x) :=
LinearMap.congr_fun h x
theorem Matrix.represents_iff {A : Matrix ι ι R} {f : Module.End R M} :
A.Represents b f ↔
∀ x, Fintype.linearCombination R b (A *ᵥ x) = f (Fintype.linearCombination R b x) :=
⟨fun e x => e.congr_fun x, fun H => LinearMap.ext fun x => H x⟩
theorem Matrix.represents_iff' {A : Matrix ι ι R} {f : Module.End R M} :
A.Represents b f ↔ ∀ j, ∑ i : ι, A i j • b i = f (b j) := by
constructor
· intro h i
have := LinearMap.congr_fun h (Pi.single i 1)
rwa [PiToModule.fromEnd_apply_single_one, PiToModule.fromMatrix_apply_single_one] at this
· intro h
ext
simp_rw [LinearMap.comp_apply, LinearMap.coe_single, PiToModule.fromEnd_apply_single_one,
PiToModule.fromMatrix_apply_single_one]
apply h
theorem Matrix.Represents.mul {A A' : Matrix ι ι R} {f f' : Module.End R M} (h : A.Represents b f)
(h' : Matrix.Represents b A' f') : (A * A').Represents b (f * f') := by
delta Matrix.Represents PiToModule.fromMatrix
rw [LinearMap.comp_apply, AlgEquiv.toLinearMap_apply, map_mul]
ext
dsimp [PiToModule.fromEnd]
rw [← h'.congr_fun, ← h.congr_fun]
rfl
theorem Matrix.Represents.one : (1 : Matrix ι ι R).Represents b 1 := by
delta Matrix.Represents PiToModule.fromMatrix
rw [LinearMap.comp_apply, AlgEquiv.toLinearMap_apply, map_one]
ext
rfl
theorem Matrix.Represents.add {A A' : Matrix ι ι R} {f f' : Module.End R M} (h : A.Represents b f)
(h' : Matrix.Represents b A' f') : (A + A').Represents b (f + f') := by
delta Matrix.Represents at h h' ⊢; rw [map_add, map_add, h, h']
theorem Matrix.Represents.zero : (0 : Matrix ι ι R).Represents b 0 := by
delta Matrix.Represents
rw [map_zero, map_zero]
theorem Matrix.Represents.smul {A : Matrix ι ι R} {f : Module.End R M} (h : A.Represents b f)
(r : R) : (r • A).Represents b (r • f) := by
delta Matrix.Represents at h ⊢
| rw [map_smul, map_smul, h]
theorem Matrix.Represents.algebraMap (r : R) :
(algebraMap _ (Matrix ι ι R) r).Represents b (algebraMap _ (Module.End R M) r) := by
simpa only [Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one] using Matrix.Represents.one.smul r
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Charpoly/LinearMap.lean | 124 | 128 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.TrailingDegree
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.EraseLead
/-!
# Reverse of a univariate polynomial
The main definition is `reverse`. Applying `reverse` to a polynomial `f : R[X]` produces
the polynomial with a reversed list of coefficients, equivalent to `X^f.natDegree * f(1/X)`.
The main result is that `reverse (f * g) = reverse f * reverse g`, provided the leading
coefficients of `f` and `g` do not multiply to zero.
-/
namespace Polynomial
open Finsupp Finset
open scoped Polynomial
section Semiring
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] {f : R[X]}
/-- If `i ≤ N`, then `revAtFun N i` returns `N - i`, otherwise it returns `i`.
This is the map used by the embedding `revAt`.
-/
def revAtFun (N i : ℕ) : ℕ :=
ite (i ≤ N) (N - i) i
theorem revAtFun_invol {N i : ℕ} : revAtFun N (revAtFun N i) = i := by
unfold revAtFun
split_ifs with h j
· exact tsub_tsub_cancel_of_le h
· exfalso
apply j
exact Nat.sub_le N i
· rfl
theorem revAtFun_inj {N : ℕ} : Function.Injective (revAtFun N) := by
intro a b hab
rw [← @revAtFun_invol N a, hab, revAtFun_invol]
/-- If `i ≤ N`, then `revAt N i` returns `N - i`, otherwise it returns `i`.
Essentially, this embedding is only used for `i ≤ N`.
The advantage of `revAt N i` over `N - i` is that `revAt` is an involution.
-/
def revAt (N : ℕ) : Function.Embedding ℕ ℕ where
toFun i := ite (i ≤ N) (N - i) i
inj' := revAtFun_inj
/-- We prefer to use the bundled `revAt` over unbundled `revAtFun`. -/
@[simp]
theorem revAtFun_eq (N i : ℕ) : revAtFun N i = revAt N i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem revAt_invol {N i : ℕ} : (revAt N) (revAt N i) = i :=
revAtFun_invol
@[simp]
theorem revAt_le {N i : ℕ} (H : i ≤ N) : revAt N i = N - i :=
if_pos H
lemma revAt_eq_self_of_lt {N i : ℕ} (h : N < i) : revAt N i = i := by simp [revAt, Nat.not_le.mpr h]
theorem revAt_add {N O n o : ℕ} (hn : n ≤ N) (ho : o ≤ O) :
revAt (N + O) (n + o) = revAt N n + revAt O o := by
rcases Nat.le.dest hn with ⟨n', rfl⟩
rcases Nat.le.dest ho with ⟨o', rfl⟩
repeat' rw [revAt_le (le_add_right rfl.le)]
rw [add_assoc, add_left_comm n' o, ← add_assoc, revAt_le (le_add_right rfl.le)]
repeat' rw [add_tsub_cancel_left]
theorem revAt_zero (N : ℕ) : revAt N 0 = N := by simp
/-- `reflect N f` is the polynomial such that `(reflect N f).coeff i = f.coeff (revAt N i)`.
In other words, the terms with exponent `[0, ..., N]` now have exponent `[N, ..., 0]`.
In practice, `reflect` is only used when `N` is at least as large as the degree of `f`.
Eventually, it will be used with `N` exactly equal to the degree of `f`. -/
noncomputable def reflect (N : ℕ) : R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨f⟩ => ⟨Finsupp.embDomain (revAt N) f⟩
theorem reflect_support (N : ℕ) (f : R[X]) :
(reflect N f).support = Finset.image (revAt N) f.support := by
rcases f with ⟨⟩
ext1
simp only [reflect, support_ofFinsupp, support_embDomain, Finset.mem_map, Finset.mem_image]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_reflect (N : ℕ) (f : R[X]) (i : ℕ) : coeff (reflect N f) i = f.coeff (revAt N i) := by
rcases f with ⟨f⟩
simp only [reflect, coeff]
calc
Finsupp.embDomain (revAt N) f i = Finsupp.embDomain (revAt N) f (revAt N (revAt N i)) := by
rw [revAt_invol]
_ = f (revAt N i) := Finsupp.embDomain_apply _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem reflect_zero {N : ℕ} : reflect N (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem reflect_eq_zero_iff {N : ℕ} {f : R[X]} : reflect N (f : R[X]) = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by
rw [ofFinsupp_eq_zero, reflect, embDomain_eq_zero, ofFinsupp_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem reflect_add (f g : R[X]) (N : ℕ) : reflect N (f + g) = reflect N f + reflect N g := by
ext
simp only [coeff_add, coeff_reflect]
@[simp]
theorem reflect_C_mul (f : R[X]) (r : R) (N : ℕ) : reflect N (C r * f) = C r * reflect N f := by
ext
simp only [coeff_reflect, coeff_C_mul]
theorem reflect_C_mul_X_pow (N n : ℕ) {c : R} : reflect N (C c * X ^ n) = C c * X ^ revAt N n := by
ext
rw [reflect_C_mul, coeff_C_mul, coeff_C_mul, coeff_X_pow, coeff_reflect]
split_ifs with h
· rw [h, revAt_invol, coeff_X_pow_self]
· rw [not_mem_support_iff.mp]
intro a
rw [← one_mul (X ^ n), ← C_1] at a
apply h
rw [← mem_support_C_mul_X_pow a, revAt_invol]
@[simp]
theorem reflect_C (r : R) (N : ℕ) : reflect N (C r) = C r * X ^ N := by
conv_lhs => rw [← mul_one (C r), ← pow_zero X, reflect_C_mul_X_pow, revAt_zero]
@[simp]
theorem reflect_monomial (N n : ℕ) : reflect N ((X : R[X]) ^ n) = X ^ revAt N n := by
rw [← one_mul (X ^ n), ← one_mul (X ^ revAt N n), ← C_1, reflect_C_mul_X_pow]
@[simp] lemma reflect_one_X : reflect 1 (X : R[X]) = 1 := by
simpa using reflect_monomial 1 1 (R := R)
lemma reflect_map {S : Type*} [Semiring S] (f : R →+* S) (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
(p.map f).reflect n = (p.reflect n).map f := by
ext; simp
@[simp]
lemma reflect_one (n : ℕ) : (1 : R[X]).reflect n = Polynomial.X ^ n := by
rw [← C.map_one, reflect_C, map_one, one_mul]
theorem reflect_mul_induction (cf cg : ℕ) :
∀ N O : ℕ,
∀ f g : R[X],
#f.support ≤ cf.succ →
#g.support ≤ cg.succ →
f.natDegree ≤ N →
g.natDegree ≤ O → reflect (N + O) (f * g) = reflect N f * reflect O g := by
induction' cf with cf hcf
--first induction (left): base case
· induction' cg with cg hcg
-- second induction (right): base case
· intro N O f g Cf Cg Nf Og
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_self Cf, ← C_mul_X_pow_eq_self Cg]
simp_rw [mul_assoc, X_pow_mul, mul_assoc, ← pow_add (X : R[X]), reflect_C_mul,
reflect_monomial, add_comm, revAt_add Nf Og, mul_assoc, X_pow_mul, mul_assoc, ←
pow_add (X : R[X]), add_comm]
-- second induction (right): induction step
· intro N O f g Cf Cg Nf Og
by_cases g0 : g = 0
· rw [g0, reflect_zero, mul_zero, mul_zero, reflect_zero]
rw [← eraseLead_add_C_mul_X_pow g, mul_add, reflect_add, reflect_add, mul_add, hcg, hcg] <;>
try assumption
· exact le_add_left card_support_C_mul_X_pow_le_one
· exact le_trans (natDegree_C_mul_X_pow_le g.leadingCoeff g.natDegree) Og
· exact Nat.lt_succ_iff.mp (gt_of_ge_of_gt Cg (eraseLead_support_card_lt g0))
· exact le_trans eraseLead_natDegree_le_aux Og
--first induction (left): induction step
· intro N O f g Cf Cg Nf Og
by_cases f0 : f = 0
· rw [f0, reflect_zero, zero_mul, zero_mul, reflect_zero]
rw [← eraseLead_add_C_mul_X_pow f, add_mul, reflect_add, reflect_add, add_mul, hcf, hcf] <;>
try assumption
· exact le_add_left card_support_C_mul_X_pow_le_one
· exact le_trans (natDegree_C_mul_X_pow_le f.leadingCoeff f.natDegree) Nf
· exact Nat.lt_succ_iff.mp (gt_of_ge_of_gt Cf (eraseLead_support_card_lt f0))
· exact le_trans eraseLead_natDegree_le_aux Nf
@[simp]
theorem reflect_mul (f g : R[X]) {F G : ℕ} (Ff : f.natDegree ≤ F) (Gg : g.natDegree ≤ G) :
reflect (F + G) (f * g) = reflect F f * reflect G g :=
reflect_mul_induction _ _ F G f g f.support.card.le_succ g.support.card.le_succ Ff Gg
section Eval₂
variable {S : Type*} [CommSemiring S]
theorem eval₂_reflect_mul_pow (i : R →+* S) (x : S) [Invertible x] (N : ℕ) (f : R[X])
(hf : f.natDegree ≤ N) : eval₂ i (⅟ x) (reflect N f) * x ^ N = eval₂ i x f := by
refine
induction_with_natDegree_le (fun f => eval₂ i (⅟ x) (reflect N f) * x ^ N = eval₂ i x f) _ ?_ ?_
?_ f hf
· simp
· intro n r _ hnN
simp only [revAt_le hnN, reflect_C_mul_X_pow, eval₂_X_pow, eval₂_C, eval₂_mul]
conv in x ^ N => rw [← Nat.sub_add_cancel hnN]
rw [pow_add, ← mul_assoc, mul_assoc (i r), ← mul_pow, invOf_mul_self, one_pow, mul_one]
· intros
simp [*, add_mul]
theorem eval₂_reflect_eq_zero_iff (i : R →+* S) (x : S) [Invertible x] (N : ℕ) (f : R[X])
(hf : f.natDegree ≤ N) : eval₂ i (⅟ x) (reflect N f) = 0 ↔ eval₂ i x f = 0 := by
conv_rhs => rw [← eval₂_reflect_mul_pow i x N f hf]
constructor
· intro h
rw [h, zero_mul]
· intro h
rw [← mul_one (eval₂ i (⅟ x) _), ← one_pow N, ← mul_invOf_self x, mul_pow, ← mul_assoc, h,
zero_mul]
end Eval₂
/-- The reverse of a polynomial f is the polynomial obtained by "reading f backwards".
Even though this is not the actual definition, `reverse f = f (1/X) * X ^ f.natDegree`. -/
noncomputable def reverse (f : R[X]) : R[X] :=
reflect f.natDegree f
theorem coeff_reverse (f : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : f.reverse.coeff n = f.coeff (revAt f.natDegree n) := by
rw [reverse, coeff_reflect]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_reverse (f : R[X]) : coeff (reverse f) 0 = leadingCoeff f := by
rw [coeff_reverse, revAt_le (zero_le f.natDegree), tsub_zero, leadingCoeff]
@[simp]
theorem reverse_zero : reverse (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_eq_zero : f.reverse = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by simp [reverse]
theorem reverse_natDegree_le (f : R[X]) : f.reverse.natDegree ≤ f.natDegree := by
rw [natDegree_le_iff_degree_le, degree_le_iff_coeff_zero]
intro n hn
rw [Nat.cast_lt] at hn
rw [coeff_reverse, revAt, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk, if_neg (not_le_of_gt hn),
coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt hn]
theorem natDegree_eq_reverse_natDegree_add_natTrailingDegree (f : R[X]) :
f.natDegree = f.reverse.natDegree + f.natTrailingDegree := by
by_cases hf : f = 0
· rw [hf, reverse_zero, natDegree_zero, natTrailingDegree_zero]
apply le_antisymm
· refine tsub_le_iff_right.mp ?_
apply le_natDegree_of_ne_zero
rw [reverse, coeff_reflect, ← revAt_le f.natTrailingDegree_le_natDegree, revAt_invol]
| exact trailingCoeff_nonzero_iff_nonzero.mpr hf
· rw [← le_tsub_iff_left f.reverse_natDegree_le]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Reverse.lean | 259 | 260 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Defs
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.FaaDiBruno
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Add
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Mul
/-!
# Higher differentiability of composition
We prove that the composition of `C^n` functions is `C^n`.
We also expand the API around `C^n` functions.
## Main results
* `ContDiff.comp` states that the composition of two `C^n` functions is `C^n`.
Similar results are given for `C^n` functions on domains.
## Notations
We use the notation `E [×n]→L[𝕜] F` for the space of continuous multilinear maps on `E^n` with
values in `F`. This is the space in which the `n`-th derivative of a function from `E` to `F` lives.
In this file, we denote `(⊤ : ℕ∞) : WithTop ℕ∞` with `∞` and `⊤ : WithTop ℕ∞` with `ω`.
## Tags
derivative, differentiability, higher derivative, `C^n`, multilinear, Taylor series, formal series
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped NNReal Nat ContDiff
universe u uE uF uG
attribute [local instance 1001]
NormedAddCommGroup.toAddCommGroup AddCommGroup.toAddCommMonoid
open Set Fin Filter Function
open scoped Topology
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
{E : Type uE} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {F : Type uF}
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] {G : Type uG} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
{X : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup X] [NormedSpace 𝕜 X] {s t : Set E} {f : E → F}
{g : F → G} {x x₀ : E} {b : E × F → G} {m n : WithTop ℕ∞} {p : E → FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F}
/-! ### Constants -/
section constants
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_const (n : ℕ) (c : F) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 (n + 1) (fun _ : E ↦ c) s = 0 := by
induction n with
| zero =>
ext1
simp [iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_eq_comp_left, iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_eq_comp, comp_def]
| succ n IH =>
rw [iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_eq_comp_left, IH]
simp only [Pi.zero_def, comp_def, fderivWithin_const, map_zero]
@[simp]
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_fun {i : ℕ} :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (fun _ : E ↦ (0 : F)) s = 0 := by
cases i with
| zero => ext; simp
| succ i => apply iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_const
@[simp]
theorem iteratedFDeriv_zero_fun {n : ℕ} : (iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 n fun _ : E ↦ (0 : F)) = 0 :=
funext fun x ↦ by simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ, iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_fun]
theorem contDiff_zero_fun : ContDiff 𝕜 n fun _ : E => (0 : F) :=
analyticOnNhd_const.contDiff
/-- Constants are `C^∞`. -/
theorem contDiff_const {c : F} : ContDiff 𝕜 n fun _ : E => c :=
analyticOnNhd_const.contDiff
theorem contDiffOn_const {c : F} {s : Set E} : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fun _ : E => c) s :=
contDiff_const.contDiffOn
theorem contDiffAt_const {c : F} : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (fun _ : E => c) x :=
contDiff_const.contDiffAt
theorem contDiffWithinAt_const {c : F} : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (fun _ : E => c) s x :=
contDiffAt_const.contDiffWithinAt
@[nontriviality]
theorem contDiff_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton F] : ContDiff 𝕜 n f := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim f fun _ => 0]; exact contDiff_const
@[nontriviality]
theorem contDiffAt_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton F] : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim f fun _ => 0]; exact contDiffAt_const
@[nontriviality]
theorem contDiffWithinAt_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton F] : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim f fun _ => 0]; exact contDiffWithinAt_const
@[nontriviality]
theorem contDiffOn_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton F] : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim f fun _ => 0]; exact contDiffOn_const
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_const_of_ne {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (c : F) (s : Set E) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n (fun _ : E ↦ c) s = 0 := by
| cases n with
| zero => contradiction
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/ContDiff/Basic.lean | 112 | 113 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.SmallSets
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousOn
/-!
# Basic results on uniform spaces
Uniform spaces are a generalization of metric spaces and topological groups.
## Main definitions
In this file we define a complete lattice structure on the type `UniformSpace X`
of uniform structures on `X`, as well as the pullback (`UniformSpace.comap`) of uniform structures
coming from the pullback of filters.
Like distance functions, uniform structures cannot be pushed forward in general.
## Notations
Localized in `Uniformity`, we have the notation `𝓤 X` for the uniformity on a uniform space `X`,
and `○` for composition of relations, seen as terms with type `Set (X × X)`.
## References
The formalization uses the books:
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
* [I. M. James, *Topologies and Uniformities*][james1999]
But it makes a more systematic use of the filter library.
-/
open Set Filter Topology
universe u v ua ub uc ud
/-!
### Relations, seen as `Set (α × α)`
-/
variable {α : Type ua} {β : Type ub} {γ : Type uc} {δ : Type ud} {ι : Sort*}
open Uniformity
section UniformSpace
variable [UniformSpace α]
/-- If `s ∈ 𝓤 α`, then for any natural `n`, for a subset `t` of a sufficiently small set in `𝓤 α`,
we have `t ○ t ○ ... ○ t ⊆ s` (`n` compositions). -/
theorem eventually_uniformity_iterate_comp_subset {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) (n : ℕ) :
∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, (t ○ ·)^[n] t ⊆ s := by
suffices ∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, t ⊆ s ∧ (t ○ ·)^[n] t ⊆ s from (eventually_and.1 this).2
induction n generalizing s with
| zero => simpa
| succ _ ihn =>
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs with ⟨t, htU, hts⟩
refine (ihn htU).mono fun U hU => ?_
rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply']
exact
⟨hU.1.trans <| (subset_comp_self <| refl_le_uniformity htU).trans hts,
(compRel_mono hU.1 hU.2).trans hts⟩
/-- If `s ∈ 𝓤 α`, then for a subset `t` of a sufficiently small set in `𝓤 α`,
we have `t ○ t ⊆ s`. -/
theorem eventually_uniformity_comp_subset {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, t ○ t ⊆ s :=
eventually_uniformity_iterate_comp_subset hs 1
/-!
### Balls in uniform spaces
-/
namespace UniformSpace
open UniformSpace (ball)
lemma isOpen_ball (x : α) {V : Set (α × α)} (hV : IsOpen V) : IsOpen (ball x V) :=
hV.preimage <| .prodMk_right _
lemma isClosed_ball (x : α) {V : Set (α × α)} (hV : IsClosed V) : IsClosed (ball x V) :=
hV.preimage <| .prodMk_right _
/-!
### Neighborhoods in uniform spaces
-/
theorem hasBasis_nhds_prod (x y : α) :
HasBasis (𝓝 (x, y)) (fun s => s ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsSymmetricRel s) fun s => ball x s ×ˢ ball y s := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
apply (hasBasis_nhds x).prod_same_index (hasBasis_nhds y)
rintro U V ⟨U_in, U_symm⟩ ⟨V_in, V_symm⟩
exact
⟨U ∩ V, ⟨(𝓤 α).inter_sets U_in V_in, U_symm.inter V_symm⟩, ball_inter_left x U V,
ball_inter_right y U V⟩
end UniformSpace
open UniformSpace
theorem nhds_eq_uniformity_prod {a b : α} :
𝓝 (a, b) =
(𝓤 α).lift' fun s : Set (α × α) => { y : α | (y, a) ∈ s } ×ˢ { y : α | (b, y) ∈ s } := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq, nhds_nhds_eq_uniformity_uniformity_prod, lift_lift'_same_eq_lift']
· exact fun s => monotone_const.set_prod monotone_preimage
· refine fun t => Monotone.set_prod ?_ monotone_const
exact monotone_preimage (f := fun y => (y, a))
theorem nhdset_of_mem_uniformity {d : Set (α × α)} (s : Set (α × α)) (hd : d ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t : Set (α × α), IsOpen t ∧ s ⊆ t ∧
t ⊆ { p | ∃ x y, (p.1, x) ∈ d ∧ (x, y) ∈ s ∧ (y, p.2) ∈ d } := by
let cl_d := { p : α × α | ∃ x y, (p.1, x) ∈ d ∧ (x, y) ∈ s ∧ (y, p.2) ∈ d }
have : ∀ p ∈ s, ∃ t, t ⊆ cl_d ∧ IsOpen t ∧ p ∈ t := fun ⟨x, y⟩ hp =>
mem_nhds_iff.mp <|
show cl_d ∈ 𝓝 (x, y) by
rw [nhds_eq_uniformity_prod, mem_lift'_sets]
· exact ⟨d, hd, fun ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => ⟨x, y, ha, hp, hb⟩⟩
· exact fun _ _ h _ h' => ⟨h h'.1, h h'.2⟩
choose t ht using this
exact ⟨(⋃ p : α × α, ⋃ h : p ∈ s, t p h : Set (α × α)),
isOpen_iUnion fun p : α × α => isOpen_iUnion fun hp => (ht p hp).right.left,
fun ⟨a, b⟩ hp => by
simp only [mem_iUnion, Prod.exists]; exact ⟨a, b, hp, (ht (a, b) hp).right.right⟩,
iUnion_subset fun p => iUnion_subset fun hp => (ht p hp).left⟩
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem nhds_le_uniformity (x : α) : 𝓝 (x, x) ≤ 𝓤 α := by
intro V V_in
rcases comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets V_in with ⟨w, w_in, w_symm, w_sub⟩
have : ball x w ×ˢ ball x w ∈ 𝓝 (x, x) := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
exact prod_mem_prod (ball_mem_nhds x w_in) (ball_mem_nhds x w_in)
apply mem_of_superset this
rintro ⟨u, v⟩ ⟨u_in, v_in⟩
exact w_sub (mem_comp_of_mem_ball w_symm u_in v_in)
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem iSup_nhds_le_uniformity : ⨆ x : α, 𝓝 (x, x) ≤ 𝓤 α :=
iSup_le nhds_le_uniformity
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem nhdsSet_diagonal_le_uniformity : 𝓝ˢ (diagonal α) ≤ 𝓤 α :=
(nhdsSet_diagonal α).trans_le iSup_nhds_le_uniformity
section
variable (α)
theorem UniformSpace.has_seq_basis [IsCountablyGenerated <| 𝓤 α] :
∃ V : ℕ → Set (α × α), HasAntitoneBasis (𝓤 α) V ∧ ∀ n, IsSymmetricRel (V n) :=
let ⟨U, hsym, hbasis⟩ := (@UniformSpace.hasBasis_symmetric α _).exists_antitone_subbasis
⟨U, hbasis, fun n => (hsym n).2⟩
end
/-!
### Closure and interior in uniform spaces
-/
theorem closure_eq_uniformity (s : Set <| α × α) :
closure s = ⋂ V ∈ { V | V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsSymmetricRel V }, V ○ s ○ V := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp +contextual only
[mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis (UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds_prod x y), mem_iInter, mem_setOf_eq,
and_imp, mem_comp_comp, exists_prop, ← mem_inter_iff, inter_comm, Set.Nonempty]
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_closed :
HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsClosed V) id := by
refine Filter.hasBasis_self.2 fun t h => ?_
rcases comp_comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets h with ⟨w, w_in, w_symm, r⟩
refine ⟨closure w, mem_of_superset w_in subset_closure, isClosed_closure, ?_⟩
refine Subset.trans ?_ r
rw [closure_eq_uniformity]
apply iInter_subset_of_subset
apply iInter_subset
exact ⟨w_in, w_symm⟩
theorem uniformity_eq_uniformity_closure : 𝓤 α = (𝓤 α).lift' closure :=
Eq.symm <| uniformity_hasBasis_closed.lift'_closure_eq_self fun _ => And.right
theorem Filter.HasBasis.uniformity_closure {p : ι → Prop} {U : ι → Set (α × α)}
(h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p U) : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun i => closure (U i) :=
(@uniformity_eq_uniformity_closure α _).symm ▸ h.lift'_closure
/-- Closed entourages form a basis of the uniformity filter. -/
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_closure : HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α) closure :=
(𝓤 α).basis_sets.uniformity_closure
theorem closure_eq_inter_uniformity {t : Set (α × α)} : closure t = ⋂ d ∈ 𝓤 α, d ○ (t ○ d) :=
calc
closure t = ⋂ (V) (_ : V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsSymmetricRel V), V ○ t ○ V := closure_eq_uniformity t
_ = ⋂ V ∈ 𝓤 α, V ○ t ○ V :=
Eq.symm <|
UniformSpace.hasBasis_symmetric.biInter_mem fun _ _ hV =>
compRel_mono (compRel_mono hV Subset.rfl) hV
_ = ⋂ V ∈ 𝓤 α, V ○ (t ○ V) := by simp only [compRel_assoc]
theorem uniformity_eq_uniformity_interior : 𝓤 α = (𝓤 α).lift' interior :=
le_antisymm
(le_iInf₂ fun d hd => by
let ⟨s, hs, hs_comp⟩ := comp3_mem_uniformity hd
let ⟨t, ht, hst, ht_comp⟩ := nhdset_of_mem_uniformity s hs
have : s ⊆ interior d :=
calc
s ⊆ t := hst
_ ⊆ interior d :=
ht.subset_interior_iff.mpr fun x (hx : x ∈ t) =>
let ⟨x, y, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := ht_comp hx
hs_comp ⟨x, h₁, y, h₂, h₃⟩
have : interior d ∈ 𝓤 α := by filter_upwards [hs] using this
simp [this])
fun _ hs => ((𝓤 α).lift' interior).sets_of_superset (mem_lift' hs) interior_subset
theorem interior_mem_uniformity {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : interior s ∈ 𝓤 α := by
rw [uniformity_eq_uniformity_interior]; exact mem_lift' hs
theorem mem_uniformity_isClosed {s : Set (α × α)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : ∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, IsClosed t ∧ t ⊆ s :=
let ⟨t, ⟨ht_mem, htc⟩, hts⟩ := uniformity_hasBasis_closed.mem_iff.1 h
⟨t, ht_mem, htc, hts⟩
theorem isOpen_iff_isOpen_ball_subset {s : Set α} :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ V ∈ 𝓤 α, IsOpen V ∧ ball x V ⊆ s := by
rw [isOpen_iff_ball_subset]
constructor <;> intro h x hx
· obtain ⟨V, hV, hV'⟩ := h x hx
exact
⟨interior V, interior_mem_uniformity hV, isOpen_interior,
(ball_mono interior_subset x).trans hV'⟩
· obtain ⟨V, hV, -, hV'⟩ := h x hx
exact ⟨V, hV, hV'⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-18")] alias
isOpen_iff_open_ball_subset := isOpen_iff_isOpen_ball_subset
/-- The uniform neighborhoods of all points of a dense set cover the whole space. -/
theorem Dense.biUnion_uniformity_ball {s : Set α} {U : Set (α × α)} (hs : Dense s) (hU : U ∈ 𝓤 α) :
⋃ x ∈ s, ball x U = univ := by
refine iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => ?_
rcases hs.inter_nhds_nonempty (mem_nhds_right y hU) with ⟨x, hxs, hxy : (x, y) ∈ U⟩
exact ⟨x, hxs, hxy⟩
/-- The uniform neighborhoods of all points of a dense indexed collection cover the whole space. -/
lemma DenseRange.iUnion_uniformity_ball {ι : Type*} {xs : ι → α}
(xs_dense : DenseRange xs) {U : Set (α × α)} (hU : U ∈ uniformity α) :
⋃ i, UniformSpace.ball (xs i) U = univ := by
rw [← biUnion_range (f := xs) (g := fun x ↦ UniformSpace.ball x U)]
exact Dense.biUnion_uniformity_ball xs_dense hU
/-!
### Uniformity bases
-/
/-- Open elements of `𝓤 α` form a basis of `𝓤 α`. -/
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_open : HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsOpen V) id :=
hasBasis_self.2 fun s hs =>
⟨interior s, interior_mem_uniformity hs, isOpen_interior, interior_subset⟩
theorem Filter.HasBasis.mem_uniformity_iff {p : β → Prop} {s : β → Set (α × α)}
(h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) {t : Set (α × α)} :
t ∈ 𝓤 α ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ ∀ a b, (a, b) ∈ s i → (a, b) ∈ t :=
h.mem_iff.trans <| by simp only [Prod.forall, subset_def]
/-- Open elements `s : Set (α × α)` of `𝓤 α` such that `(x, y) ∈ s ↔ (y, x) ∈ s` form a basis
of `𝓤 α`. -/
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_open_symmetric :
HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsOpen V ∧ IsSymmetricRel V) id := by
simp only [← and_assoc]
refine uniformity_hasBasis_open.restrict fun s hs => ⟨symmetrizeRel s, ?_⟩
exact
⟨⟨symmetrize_mem_uniformity hs.1, IsOpen.inter hs.2 (hs.2.preimage continuous_swap)⟩,
symmetric_symmetrizeRel s, symmetrizeRel_subset_self s⟩
theorem comp_open_symm_mem_uniformity_sets {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, IsOpen t ∧ IsSymmetricRel t ∧ t ○ t ⊆ s := by
obtain ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs
obtain ⟨u, ⟨hu₁, hu₂, hu₃⟩, hu₄ : u ⊆ t⟩ := uniformity_hasBasis_open_symmetric.mem_iff.mp ht₁
exact ⟨u, hu₁, hu₂, hu₃, (compRel_mono hu₄ hu₄).trans ht₂⟩
end UniformSpace
open uniformity
section Constructions
instance : PartialOrder (UniformSpace α) :=
PartialOrder.lift (fun u => 𝓤[u]) fun _ _ => UniformSpace.ext
protected theorem UniformSpace.le_def {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} : u₁ ≤ u₂ ↔ 𝓤[u₁] ≤ 𝓤[u₂] := Iff.rfl
instance : InfSet (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨fun s =>
UniformSpace.ofCore
{ uniformity := ⨅ u ∈ s, 𝓤[u]
refl := le_iInf fun u => le_iInf fun _ => u.toCore.refl
symm := le_iInf₂ fun u hu =>
le_trans (map_mono <| iInf_le_of_le _ <| iInf_le _ hu) u.symm
comp := le_iInf₂ fun u hu =>
le_trans (lift'_mono (iInf_le_of_le _ <| iInf_le _ hu) <| le_rfl) u.comp }⟩
protected theorem UniformSpace.sInf_le {tt : Set (UniformSpace α)} {t : UniformSpace α}
(h : t ∈ tt) : sInf tt ≤ t :=
show ⨅ u ∈ tt, 𝓤[u] ≤ 𝓤[t] from iInf₂_le t h
protected theorem UniformSpace.le_sInf {tt : Set (UniformSpace α)} {t : UniformSpace α}
(h : ∀ t' ∈ tt, t ≤ t') : t ≤ sInf tt :=
show 𝓤[t] ≤ ⨅ u ∈ tt, 𝓤[u] from le_iInf₂ h
instance : Top (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨@UniformSpace.mk α ⊤ ⊤ le_top le_top fun x ↦ by simp only [nhds_top, comap_top]⟩
instance : Bot (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨{ toTopologicalSpace := ⊥
uniformity := 𝓟 idRel
symm := by simp [Tendsto]
comp := lift'_le (mem_principal_self _) <| principal_mono.2 id_compRel.subset
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity := fun s => by
let _ : TopologicalSpace α := ⊥; have := discreteTopology_bot α
simp [idRel] }⟩
instance : Min (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨fun u₁ u₂ =>
{ uniformity := 𝓤[u₁] ⊓ 𝓤[u₂]
symm := u₁.symm.inf u₂.symm
comp := (lift'_inf_le _ _ _).trans <| inf_le_inf u₁.comp u₂.comp
toTopologicalSpace := u₁.toTopologicalSpace ⊓ u₂.toTopologicalSpace
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity := fun _ ↦ by
rw [@nhds_inf _ u₁.toTopologicalSpace _, @nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ u₁,
@nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ u₂, comap_inf] }⟩
instance : CompleteLattice (UniformSpace α) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (PartialOrder (UniformSpace α)) with
sup := fun a b => sInf { x | a ≤ x ∧ b ≤ x }
le_sup_left := fun _ _ => UniformSpace.le_sInf fun _ ⟨h, _⟩ => h
le_sup_right := fun _ _ => UniformSpace.le_sInf fun _ ⟨_, h⟩ => h
sup_le := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => UniformSpace.sInf_le ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
le_inf := fun a _ _ h₁ h₂ => show a.uniformity ≤ _ from le_inf h₁ h₂
inf_le_left := fun a _ => show _ ≤ a.uniformity from inf_le_left
inf_le_right := fun _ b => show _ ≤ b.uniformity from inf_le_right
top := ⊤
le_top := fun a => show a.uniformity ≤ ⊤ from le_top
bot := ⊥
bot_le := fun u => u.toCore.refl
sSup := fun tt => sInf { t | ∀ t' ∈ tt, t' ≤ t }
le_sSup := fun _ _ h => UniformSpace.le_sInf fun _ h' => h' _ h
sSup_le := fun _ _ h => UniformSpace.sInf_le h
sInf := sInf
le_sInf := fun _ _ hs => UniformSpace.le_sInf hs
sInf_le := fun _ _ ha => UniformSpace.sInf_le ha }
theorem iInf_uniformity {ι : Sort*} {u : ι → UniformSpace α} : 𝓤[iInf u] = ⨅ i, 𝓤[u i] :=
iInf_range
theorem inf_uniformity {u v : UniformSpace α} : 𝓤[u ⊓ v] = 𝓤[u] ⊓ 𝓤[v] := rfl
lemma bot_uniformity : 𝓤[(⊥ : UniformSpace α)] = 𝓟 idRel := rfl
lemma top_uniformity : 𝓤[(⊤ : UniformSpace α)] = ⊤ := rfl
instance inhabitedUniformSpace : Inhabited (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨⊥⟩
instance inhabitedUniformSpaceCore : Inhabited (UniformSpace.Core α) :=
⟨@UniformSpace.toCore _ default⟩
instance [Subsingleton α] : Unique (UniformSpace α) where
uniq u := bot_unique <| le_principal_iff.2 <| by
rw [idRel, ← diagonal, diagonal_eq_univ]; exact univ_mem
/-- Given `f : α → β` and a uniformity `u` on `β`, the inverse image of `u` under `f`
is the inverse image in the filter sense of the induced function `α × α → β × β`.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev UniformSpace.comap (f : α → β) (u : UniformSpace β) : UniformSpace α where
uniformity := 𝓤[u].comap fun p : α × α => (f p.1, f p.2)
symm := by
simp only [tendsto_comap_iff, Prod.swap, (· ∘ ·)]
exact tendsto_swap_uniformity.comp tendsto_comap
comp := le_trans
(by
rw [comap_lift'_eq, comap_lift'_eq2]
· exact lift'_mono' fun s _ ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨x, h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨f x, h₁, h₂⟩
· exact monotone_id.compRel monotone_id)
(comap_mono u.comp)
toTopologicalSpace := u.toTopologicalSpace.induced f
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity x := by
simp only [nhds_induced, nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, comap_comap, Function.comp_def]
theorem uniformity_comap {_ : UniformSpace β} (f : α → β) :
𝓤[UniformSpace.comap f ‹_›] = comap (Prod.map f f) (𝓤 β) :=
rfl
lemma ball_preimage {f : α → β} {U : Set (β × β)} {x : α} :
UniformSpace.ball x (Prod.map f f ⁻¹' U) = f ⁻¹' UniformSpace.ball (f x) U := by
ext : 1
simp only [UniformSpace.ball, mem_preimage, Prod.map_apply]
@[simp]
theorem uniformSpace_comap_id {α : Type*} : UniformSpace.comap (id : α → α) = id := by
ext : 2
rw [uniformity_comap, Prod.map_id, comap_id]
theorem UniformSpace.comap_comap {α β γ} {uγ : UniformSpace γ} {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} :
UniformSpace.comap (g ∘ f) uγ = UniformSpace.comap f (UniformSpace.comap g uγ) := by
ext1
simp only [uniformity_comap, Filter.comap_comap, Prod.map_comp_map]
theorem UniformSpace.comap_inf {α γ} {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace γ} {f : α → γ} :
(u₁ ⊓ u₂).comap f = u₁.comap f ⊓ u₂.comap f :=
UniformSpace.ext Filter.comap_inf
theorem UniformSpace.comap_iInf {ι α γ} {u : ι → UniformSpace γ} {f : α → γ} :
(⨅ i, u i).comap f = ⨅ i, (u i).comap f := by
ext : 1
simp [uniformity_comap, iInf_uniformity]
theorem UniformSpace.comap_mono {α γ} {f : α → γ} :
Monotone fun u : UniformSpace γ => u.comap f := fun _ _ hu =>
Filter.comap_mono hu
theorem uniformContinuous_iff {α β} {uα : UniformSpace α} {uβ : UniformSpace β} {f : α → β} :
UniformContinuous f ↔ uα ≤ uβ.comap f :=
Filter.map_le_iff_le_comap
theorem le_iff_uniformContinuous_id {u v : UniformSpace α} :
u ≤ v ↔ @UniformContinuous _ _ u v id := by
rw [uniformContinuous_iff, uniformSpace_comap_id, id]
theorem uniformContinuous_comap {f : α → β} [u : UniformSpace β] :
@UniformContinuous α β (UniformSpace.comap f u) u f :=
tendsto_comap
theorem uniformContinuous_comap' {f : γ → β} {g : α → γ} [v : UniformSpace β] [u : UniformSpace α]
(h : UniformContinuous (f ∘ g)) : @UniformContinuous α γ u (UniformSpace.comap f v) g :=
tendsto_comap_iff.2 h
namespace UniformSpace
theorem to_nhds_mono {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} (h : u₁ ≤ u₂) (a : α) :
@nhds _ (@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₁) a ≤
@nhds _ (@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₂) a := by
rw [@nhds_eq_uniformity α u₁ a, @nhds_eq_uniformity α u₂ a]; exact lift'_mono h le_rfl
theorem toTopologicalSpace_mono {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} (h : u₁ ≤ u₂) :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₁ ≤ @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₂ :=
le_of_nhds_le_nhds <| to_nhds_mono h
theorem toTopologicalSpace_comap {f : α → β} {u : UniformSpace β} :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ (UniformSpace.comap f u) =
TopologicalSpace.induced f (@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace β u) :=
rfl
lemma uniformSpace_eq_bot {u : UniformSpace α} : u = ⊥ ↔ idRel ∈ 𝓤[u] :=
le_bot_iff.symm.trans le_principal_iff
protected lemma _root_.Filter.HasBasis.uniformSpace_eq_bot {ι p} {s : ι → Set (α × α)}
{u : UniformSpace α} (h : 𝓤[u].HasBasis p s) :
u = ⊥ ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ Pairwise fun x y : α ↦ (x, y) ∉ s i := by
simp [uniformSpace_eq_bot, h.mem_iff, subset_def, Pairwise, not_imp_not]
theorem toTopologicalSpace_bot : @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace α ⊥ = ⊥ := rfl
theorem toTopologicalSpace_top : @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace α ⊤ = ⊤ := rfl
theorem toTopologicalSpace_iInf {ι : Sort*} {u : ι → UniformSpace α} :
(iInf u).toTopologicalSpace = ⨅ i, (u i).toTopologicalSpace :=
TopologicalSpace.ext_nhds fun a ↦ by simp only [@nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ (iInf u), nhds_iInf,
iInf_uniformity, @nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ (u _), Filter.comap_iInf]
theorem toTopologicalSpace_sInf {s : Set (UniformSpace α)} :
(sInf s).toTopologicalSpace = ⨅ i ∈ s, @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace α i := by
rw [sInf_eq_iInf]
simp only [← toTopologicalSpace_iInf]
theorem toTopologicalSpace_inf {u v : UniformSpace α} :
(u ⊓ v).toTopologicalSpace = u.toTopologicalSpace ⊓ v.toTopologicalSpace :=
rfl
end UniformSpace
theorem UniformContinuous.continuous [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) : Continuous f :=
continuous_iff_le_induced.mpr <| UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace_mono <|
uniformContinuous_iff.1 hf
/-- Uniform space structure on `ULift α`. -/
instance ULift.uniformSpace [UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace (ULift α) :=
UniformSpace.comap ULift.down ‹_›
/-- Uniform space structure on `αᵒᵈ`. -/
instance OrderDual.instUniformSpace [UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace (αᵒᵈ) :=
‹UniformSpace α›
section UniformContinuousInfi
-- TODO: add an `iff` lemma?
theorem UniformContinuous.inf_rng {f : α → β} {u₁ : UniformSpace α} {u₂ u₃ : UniformSpace β}
(h₁ : UniformContinuous[u₁, u₂] f) (h₂ : UniformContinuous[u₁, u₃] f) :
UniformContinuous[u₁, u₂ ⊓ u₃] f :=
tendsto_inf.mpr ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
theorem UniformContinuous.inf_dom_left {f : α → β} {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} {u₃ : UniformSpace β}
(hf : UniformContinuous[u₁, u₃] f) : UniformContinuous[u₁ ⊓ u₂, u₃] f :=
tendsto_inf_left hf
theorem UniformContinuous.inf_dom_right {f : α → β} {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} {u₃ : UniformSpace β}
(hf : UniformContinuous[u₂, u₃] f) : UniformContinuous[u₁ ⊓ u₂, u₃] f :=
tendsto_inf_right hf
theorem uniformContinuous_sInf_dom {f : α → β} {u₁ : Set (UniformSpace α)} {u₂ : UniformSpace β}
{u : UniformSpace α} (h₁ : u ∈ u₁) (hf : UniformContinuous[u, u₂] f) :
UniformContinuous[sInf u₁, u₂] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [sInf_eq_iInf', iInf_uniformity]
exact tendsto_iInf' ⟨u, h₁⟩ hf
theorem uniformContinuous_sInf_rng {f : α → β} {u₁ : UniformSpace α} {u₂ : Set (UniformSpace β)} :
UniformContinuous[u₁, sInf u₂] f ↔ ∀ u ∈ u₂, UniformContinuous[u₁, u] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [sInf_eq_iInf', iInf_uniformity, tendsto_iInf, SetCoe.forall]
theorem uniformContinuous_iInf_dom {f : α → β} {u₁ : ι → UniformSpace α} {u₂ : UniformSpace β}
{i : ι} (hf : UniformContinuous[u₁ i, u₂] f) : UniformContinuous[iInf u₁, u₂] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [iInf_uniformity]
exact tendsto_iInf' i hf
theorem uniformContinuous_iInf_rng {f : α → β} {u₁ : UniformSpace α} {u₂ : ι → UniformSpace β} :
UniformContinuous[u₁, iInf u₂] f ↔ ∀ i, UniformContinuous[u₁, u₂ i] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [iInf_uniformity, tendsto_iInf]
end UniformContinuousInfi
/-- A uniform space with the discrete uniformity has the discrete topology. -/
theorem discreteTopology_of_discrete_uniformity [hα : UniformSpace α] (h : uniformity α = 𝓟 idRel) :
DiscreteTopology α :=
⟨(UniformSpace.ext h.symm : ⊥ = hα) ▸ rfl⟩
instance : UniformSpace Empty := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace PUnit := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace Bool := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace ℕ := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace ℤ := ⊥
section
variable [UniformSpace α]
open Additive Multiplicative
instance : UniformSpace (Additive α) := ‹UniformSpace α›
instance : UniformSpace (Multiplicative α) := ‹UniformSpace α›
theorem uniformContinuous_ofMul : UniformContinuous (ofMul : α → Additive α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformContinuous_toMul : UniformContinuous (toMul : Additive α → α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformContinuous_ofAdd : UniformContinuous (ofAdd : α → Multiplicative α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformContinuous_toAdd : UniformContinuous (toAdd : Multiplicative α → α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformity_additive : 𝓤 (Additive α) = (𝓤 α).map (Prod.map ofMul ofMul) := rfl
theorem uniformity_multiplicative : 𝓤 (Multiplicative α) = (𝓤 α).map (Prod.map ofAdd ofAdd) := rfl
end
instance instUniformSpaceSubtype {p : α → Prop} [t : UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace (Subtype p) :=
UniformSpace.comap Subtype.val t
theorem uniformity_subtype {p : α → Prop} [UniformSpace α] :
𝓤 (Subtype p) = comap (fun q : Subtype p × Subtype p => (q.1.1, q.2.1)) (𝓤 α) :=
rfl
theorem uniformity_setCoe {s : Set α} [UniformSpace α] :
𝓤 s = comap (Prod.map ((↑) : s → α) ((↑) : s → α)) (𝓤 α) :=
rfl
theorem map_uniformity_set_coe {s : Set α} [UniformSpace α] :
map (Prod.map (↑) (↑)) (𝓤 s) = 𝓤 α ⊓ 𝓟 (s ×ˢ s) := by
rw [uniformity_setCoe, map_comap, range_prodMap, Subtype.range_val]
theorem uniformContinuous_subtype_val {p : α → Prop} [UniformSpace α] :
UniformContinuous (Subtype.val : { a : α // p a } → α) :=
uniformContinuous_comap
theorem UniformContinuous.subtype_mk {p : α → Prop} [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : β → α}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) (h : ∀ x, p (f x)) :
UniformContinuous (fun x => ⟨f x, h x⟩ : β → Subtype p) :=
uniformContinuous_comap' hf
theorem uniformContinuousOn_iff_restrict [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
UniformContinuousOn f s ↔ UniformContinuous (s.restrict f) := by
delta UniformContinuousOn UniformContinuous
rw [← map_uniformity_set_coe, tendsto_map'_iff]; rfl
theorem tendsto_of_uniformContinuous_subtype [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β}
{s : Set α} {a : α} (hf : UniformContinuous fun x : s => f x.val) (ha : s ∈ 𝓝 a) :
Tendsto f (𝓝 a) (𝓝 (f a)) := by
rw [(@map_nhds_subtype_coe_eq_nhds α _ s a (mem_of_mem_nhds ha) ha).symm]
exact tendsto_map' hf.continuous.continuousAt
theorem UniformContinuousOn.continuousOn [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α}
(h : UniformContinuousOn f s) : ContinuousOn f s := by
rw [uniformContinuousOn_iff_restrict] at h
rw [continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict]
exact h.continuous
@[to_additive]
instance [UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace αᵐᵒᵖ :=
UniformSpace.comap MulOpposite.unop ‹_›
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformity_mulOpposite [UniformSpace α] :
𝓤 αᵐᵒᵖ = comap (fun q : αᵐᵒᵖ × αᵐᵒᵖ => (q.1.unop, q.2.unop)) (𝓤 α) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem comap_uniformity_mulOpposite [UniformSpace α] :
comap (fun p : α × α => (MulOpposite.op p.1, MulOpposite.op p.2)) (𝓤 αᵐᵒᵖ) = 𝓤 α := by
simpa [uniformity_mulOpposite, comap_comap, (· ∘ ·)] using comap_id
namespace MulOpposite
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformContinuous_unop [UniformSpace α] : UniformContinuous (unop : αᵐᵒᵖ → α) :=
uniformContinuous_comap
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformContinuous_op [UniformSpace α] : UniformContinuous (op : α → αᵐᵒᵖ) :=
uniformContinuous_comap' uniformContinuous_id
end MulOpposite
section Prod
open UniformSpace
/- a similar product space is possible on the function space (uniformity of pointwise convergence),
but we want to have the uniformity of uniform convergence on function spaces -/
instance instUniformSpaceProd [u₁ : UniformSpace α] [u₂ : UniformSpace β] : UniformSpace (α × β) :=
u₁.comap Prod.fst ⊓ u₂.comap Prod.snd
-- check the above produces no diamond for `simp` and typeclass search
example [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
(instTopologicalSpaceProd : TopologicalSpace (α × β)) = UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace := by
with_reducible_and_instances rfl
theorem uniformity_prod [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
𝓤 (α × β) =
((𝓤 α).comap fun p : (α × β) × α × β => (p.1.1, p.2.1)) ⊓
(𝓤 β).comap fun p : (α × β) × α × β => (p.1.2, p.2.2) :=
rfl
instance [UniformSpace α] [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 α)]
[UniformSpace β] [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 β)] : IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 (α × β)) := by
rw [uniformity_prod]
infer_instance
theorem uniformity_prod_eq_comap_prod [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
𝓤 (α × β) =
comap (fun p : (α × β) × α × β => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) (𝓤 α ×ˢ 𝓤 β) := by
simp_rw [uniformity_prod, prod_eq_inf, Filter.comap_inf, Filter.comap_comap, Function.comp_def]
theorem uniformity_prod_eq_prod [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
𝓤 (α × β) = map (fun p : (α × α) × β × β => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) (𝓤 α ×ˢ 𝓤 β) := by
rw [map_swap4_eq_comap, uniformity_prod_eq_comap_prod]
theorem mem_uniformity_of_uniformContinuous_invariant [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
{s : Set (β × β)} {f : α → α → β} (hf : UniformContinuous fun p : α × α => f p.1 p.2)
(hs : s ∈ 𝓤 β) : ∃ u ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ a b c, (a, b) ∈ u → (f a c, f b c) ∈ s := by
rw [UniformContinuous, uniformity_prod_eq_prod, tendsto_map'_iff] at hf
rcases mem_prod_iff.1 (mem_map.1 <| hf hs) with ⟨u, hu, v, hv, huvt⟩
exact ⟨u, hu, fun a b c hab => @huvt ((_, _), (_, _)) ⟨hab, refl_mem_uniformity hv⟩⟩
/-- An entourage of the diagonal in `α` and an entourage in `β` yield an entourage in `α × β`
once we permute coordinates. -/
def entourageProd (u : Set (α × α)) (v : Set (β × β)) : Set ((α × β) × α × β) :=
{((a₁, b₁),(a₂, b₂)) | (a₁, a₂) ∈ u ∧ (b₁, b₂) ∈ v}
theorem mem_entourageProd {u : Set (α × α)} {v : Set (β × β)} {p : (α × β) × α × β} :
p ∈ entourageProd u v ↔ (p.1.1, p.2.1) ∈ u ∧ (p.1.2, p.2.2) ∈ v := Iff.rfl
theorem entourageProd_mem_uniformity [t₁ : UniformSpace α] [t₂ : UniformSpace β] {u : Set (α × α)}
| {v : Set (β × β)} (hu : u ∈ 𝓤 α) (hv : v ∈ 𝓤 β) :
entourageProd u v ∈ 𝓤 (α × β) := by
rw [uniformity_prod]; exact inter_mem_inf (preimage_mem_comap hu) (preimage_mem_comap hv)
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean | 692 | 695 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Piecewise
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.UnorderedInterval
/-!
# Intervals in `pi`-space
In this we prove various simple lemmas about intervals in `Π i, α i`. Closed intervals (`Ici x`,
`Iic x`, `Icc x y`) are equal to products of their projections to `α i`, while (semi-)open intervals
usually include the corresponding products as proper subsets.
-/
-- Porting note: Added, since dot notation no longer works on `Function.update`
open Function
variable {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*}
namespace Set
section PiPreorder
variable [∀ i, Preorder (α i)] (x y : ∀ i, α i)
@[simp]
theorem pi_univ_Ici : (pi univ fun i ↦ Ici (x i)) = Ici x :=
ext fun y ↦ by simp [Pi.le_def]
@[simp]
theorem pi_univ_Iic : (pi univ fun i ↦ Iic (x i)) = Iic x :=
ext fun y ↦ by simp [Pi.le_def]
@[simp]
theorem pi_univ_Icc : (pi univ fun i ↦ Icc (x i) (y i)) = Icc x y :=
ext fun y ↦ by simp [Pi.le_def, forall_and]
theorem piecewise_mem_Icc {s : Set ι} [∀ j, Decidable (j ∈ s)] {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : ∀ i, α i}
(h₁ : ∀ i ∈ s, f₁ i ∈ Icc (g₁ i) (g₂ i)) (h₂ : ∀ i ∉ s, f₂ i ∈ Icc (g₁ i) (g₂ i)) :
s.piecewise f₁ f₂ ∈ Icc g₁ g₂ :=
⟨le_piecewise (fun i hi ↦ (h₁ i hi).1) fun i hi ↦ (h₂ i hi).1,
piecewise_le (fun i hi ↦ (h₁ i hi).2) fun i hi ↦ (h₂ i hi).2⟩
theorem piecewise_mem_Icc' {s : Set ι} [∀ j, Decidable (j ∈ s)] {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : ∀ i, α i}
(h₁ : f₁ ∈ Icc g₁ g₂) (h₂ : f₂ ∈ Icc g₁ g₂) : s.piecewise f₁ f₂ ∈ Icc g₁ g₂ :=
piecewise_mem_Icc (fun _ _ ↦ ⟨h₁.1 _, h₁.2 _⟩) fun _ _ ↦ ⟨h₂.1 _, h₂.2 _⟩
section Nonempty
theorem pi_univ_Ioi_subset [Nonempty ι]: (pi univ fun i ↦ Ioi (x i)) ⊆ Ioi x := fun _ hz ↦
⟨fun i ↦ le_of_lt <| hz i trivial, fun h ↦
(‹Nonempty ι›.elim) fun i ↦ not_lt_of_le (h i) (hz i trivial)⟩
theorem pi_univ_Iio_subset [Nonempty ι]: (pi univ fun i ↦ Iio (x i)) ⊆ Iio x :=
pi_univ_Ioi_subset (α := fun i ↦ (α i)ᵒᵈ) x
theorem pi_univ_Ioo_subset [Nonempty ι]: (pi univ fun i ↦ Ioo (x i) (y i)) ⊆ Ioo x y := fun _ hx ↦
⟨(pi_univ_Ioi_subset _) fun i hi ↦ (hx i hi).1, (pi_univ_Iio_subset _) fun i hi ↦ (hx i hi).2⟩
theorem pi_univ_Ioc_subset [Nonempty ι]: (pi univ fun i ↦ Ioc (x i) (y i)) ⊆ Ioc x y := fun _ hx ↦
⟨(pi_univ_Ioi_subset _) fun i hi ↦ (hx i hi).1, fun i ↦ (hx i trivial).2⟩
theorem pi_univ_Ico_subset [Nonempty ι]: (pi univ fun i ↦ Ico (x i) (y i)) ⊆ Ico x y := fun _ hx ↦
⟨fun i ↦ (hx i trivial).1, (pi_univ_Iio_subset _) fun i hi ↦ (hx i hi).2⟩
end Nonempty
variable [DecidableEq ι]
open Function (update)
theorem pi_univ_Ioc_update_left {x y : ∀ i, α i} {i₀ : ι} {m : α i₀} (hm : x i₀ ≤ m) :
(pi univ fun i ↦ Ioc (update x i₀ m i) (y i)) =
{ z | m < z i₀ } ∩ pi univ fun i ↦ Ioc (x i) (y i) := by
have : Ioc m (y i₀) = Ioi m ∩ Ioc (x i₀) (y i₀) := by
rw [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← inter_assoc,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_left (Ioi_subset_Ioi hm)]
simp_rw [univ_pi_update i₀ _ _ fun i z ↦ Ioc z (y i), ← pi_inter_compl ({i₀} : Set ι),
singleton_pi', ← inter_assoc, this]
rfl
theorem pi_univ_Ioc_update_right {x y : ∀ i, α i} {i₀ : ι} {m : α i₀} (hm : m ≤ y i₀) :
(pi univ fun i ↦ Ioc (x i) (update y i₀ m i)) =
{ z | z i₀ ≤ m } ∩ pi univ fun i ↦ Ioc (x i) (y i) := by
have : Ioc (x i₀) m = Iic m ∩ Ioc (x i₀) (y i₀) := by
rw [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ioi_inter_Iic, inter_left_comm,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_left (Iic_subset_Iic.2 hm)]
simp_rw [univ_pi_update i₀ y m fun i z ↦ Ioc (x i) z, ← pi_inter_compl ({i₀} : Set ι),
singleton_pi', ← inter_assoc, this]
rfl
theorem disjoint_pi_univ_Ioc_update_left_right {x y : ∀ i, α i} {i₀ : ι} {m : α i₀} :
Disjoint (pi univ fun i ↦ Ioc (x i) (update y i₀ m i))
(pi univ fun i ↦ Ioc (update x i₀ m i) (y i)) := by
rw [disjoint_left]
rintro z h₁ h₂
refine (h₁ i₀ (mem_univ _)).2.not_lt ?_
simpa only [Function.update_self] using (h₂ i₀ (mem_univ _)).1
end PiPreorder
section PiPartialOrder
variable [DecidableEq ι] [∀ i, PartialOrder (α i)]
-- Porting note: Dot notation on `Function.update` broke
theorem image_update_Icc (f : ∀ i, α i) (i : ι) (a b : α i) :
update f i '' Icc a b = Icc (update f i a) (update f i b) := by
ext x
rw [← Set.pi_univ_Icc]
refine ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨x i, ?_, ?_⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩
simpa [update_le_update_iff]
· simpa only [Function.update_self] using h i (mem_univ i)
· ext j
obtain rfl | hij := eq_or_ne i j
· exact Function.update_self ..
· simpa only [Function.update_of_ne hij.symm, le_antisymm_iff] using h j (mem_univ j)
theorem image_update_Ico (f : ∀ i, α i) (i : ι) (a b : α i) :
update f i '' Ico a b = Ico (update f i a) (update f i b) := by
rw [← Icc_diff_right, ← Icc_diff_right, image_diff (update_injective _ _), image_singleton,
image_update_Icc]
theorem image_update_Ioc (f : ∀ i, α i) (i : ι) (a b : α i) :
update f i '' Ioc a b = Ioc (update f i a) (update f i b) := by
rw [← Icc_diff_left, ← Icc_diff_left, image_diff (update_injective _ _), image_singleton,
image_update_Icc]
theorem image_update_Ioo (f : ∀ i, α i) (i : ι) (a b : α i) :
update f i '' Ioo a b = Ioo (update f i a) (update f i b) := by
rw [← Ico_diff_left, ← Ico_diff_left, image_diff (update_injective _ _), image_singleton,
image_update_Ico]
theorem image_update_Icc_left (f : ∀ i, α i) (i : ι) (a : α i) :
update f i '' Icc a (f i) = Icc (update f i a) f := by simpa using image_update_Icc f i a (f i)
theorem image_update_Ico_left (f : ∀ i, α i) (i : ι) (a : α i) :
update f i '' Ico a (f i) = Ico (update f i a) f := by simpa using image_update_Ico f i a (f i)
theorem image_update_Ioc_left (f : ∀ i, α i) (i : ι) (a : α i) :
update f i '' Ioc a (f i) = Ioc (update f i a) f := by simpa using image_update_Ioc f i a (f i)
theorem image_update_Ioo_left (f : ∀ i, α i) (i : ι) (a : α i) :
update f i '' Ioo a (f i) = Ioo (update f i a) f := by simpa using image_update_Ioo f i a (f i)
theorem image_update_Icc_right (f : ∀ i, α i) (i : ι) (b : α i) :
update f i '' Icc (f i) b = Icc f (update f i b) := by simpa using image_update_Icc f i (f i) b
theorem image_update_Ico_right (f : ∀ i, α i) (i : ι) (b : α i) :
update f i '' Ico (f i) b = Ico f (update f i b) := by simpa using image_update_Ico f i (f i) b
theorem image_update_Ioc_right (f : ∀ i, α i) (i : ι) (b : α i) :
update f i '' Ioc (f i) b = Ioc f (update f i b) := by simpa using image_update_Ioc f i (f i) b
theorem image_update_Ioo_right (f : ∀ i, α i) (i : ι) (b : α i) :
update f i '' Ioo (f i) b = Ioo f (update f i b) := by simpa using image_update_Ioo f i (f i) b
variable [∀ i, One (α i)]
@[to_additive]
theorem image_mulSingle_Icc (i : ι) (a b : α i) :
Pi.mulSingle i '' Icc a b = Icc (Pi.mulSingle i a) (Pi.mulSingle i b) :=
image_update_Icc _ _ _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem image_mulSingle_Ico (i : ι) (a b : α i) :
Pi.mulSingle i '' Ico a b = Ico (Pi.mulSingle i a) (Pi.mulSingle i b) :=
image_update_Ico _ _ _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem image_mulSingle_Ioc (i : ι) (a b : α i) :
Pi.mulSingle i '' Ioc a b = Ioc (Pi.mulSingle i a) (Pi.mulSingle i b) :=
image_update_Ioc _ _ _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem image_mulSingle_Ioo (i : ι) (a b : α i) :
Pi.mulSingle i '' Ioo a b = Ioo (Pi.mulSingle i a) (Pi.mulSingle i b) :=
image_update_Ioo _ _ _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem image_mulSingle_Icc_left (i : ι) (a : α i) :
Pi.mulSingle i '' Icc a 1 = Icc (Pi.mulSingle i a) 1 :=
image_update_Icc_left _ _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem image_mulSingle_Ico_left (i : ι) (a : α i) :
Pi.mulSingle i '' Ico a 1 = Ico (Pi.mulSingle i a) 1 :=
image_update_Ico_left _ _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem image_mulSingle_Ioc_left (i : ι) (a : α i) :
Pi.mulSingle i '' Ioc a 1 = Ioc (Pi.mulSingle i a) 1 :=
image_update_Ioc_left _ _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem image_mulSingle_Ioo_left (i : ι) (a : α i) :
Pi.mulSingle i '' Ioo a 1 = Ioo (Pi.mulSingle i a) 1 :=
image_update_Ioo_left _ _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem image_mulSingle_Icc_right (i : ι) (b : α i) :
Pi.mulSingle i '' Icc 1 b = Icc 1 (Pi.mulSingle i b) :=
image_update_Icc_right _ _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem image_mulSingle_Ico_right (i : ι) (b : α i) :
Pi.mulSingle i '' Ico 1 b = Ico 1 (Pi.mulSingle i b) :=
image_update_Ico_right _ _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem image_mulSingle_Ioc_right (i : ι) (b : α i) :
Pi.mulSingle i '' Ioc 1 b = Ioc 1 (Pi.mulSingle i b) :=
image_update_Ioc_right _ _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem image_mulSingle_Ioo_right (i : ι) (b : α i) :
Pi.mulSingle i '' Ioo 1 b = Ioo 1 (Pi.mulSingle i b) :=
image_update_Ioo_right _ _ _
end PiPartialOrder
section PiLattice
variable [∀ i, Lattice (α i)]
@[simp]
theorem pi_univ_uIcc (a b : ∀ i, α i) : (pi univ fun i => uIcc (a i) (b i)) = uIcc a b :=
pi_univ_Icc _ _
variable [DecidableEq ι]
theorem image_update_uIcc (f : ∀ i, α i) (i : ι) (a b : α i) :
update f i '' uIcc a b = uIcc (update f i a) (update f i b) :=
(image_update_Icc _ _ _ _).trans <| by simp_rw [uIcc, update_sup, update_inf]
theorem image_update_uIcc_left (f : ∀ i, α i) (i : ι) (a : α i) :
update f i '' uIcc a (f i) = uIcc (update f i a) f := by
simpa using image_update_uIcc f i a (f i)
theorem image_update_uIcc_right (f : ∀ i, α i) (i : ι) (b : α i) :
update f i '' uIcc (f i) b = uIcc f (update f i b) := by
simpa using image_update_uIcc f i (f i) b
variable [∀ i, One (α i)]
@[to_additive]
theorem image_mulSingle_uIcc (i : ι) (a b : α i) :
Pi.mulSingle i '' uIcc a b = uIcc (Pi.mulSingle i a) (Pi.mulSingle i b) :=
image_update_uIcc _ _ _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem image_mulSingle_uIcc_left (i : ι) (a : α i) :
Pi.mulSingle i '' uIcc a 1 = uIcc (Pi.mulSingle i a) 1 :=
image_update_uIcc_left _ _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem image_mulSingle_uIcc_right (i : ι) (b : α i) :
Pi.mulSingle i '' uIcc 1 b = uIcc 1 (Pi.mulSingle i b) :=
image_update_uIcc_right _ _ _
end PiLattice
variable [DecidableEq ι] [∀ i, LinearOrder (α i)]
open Function (update)
theorem pi_univ_Ioc_update_union (x y : ∀ i, α i) (i₀ : ι) (m : α i₀) (hm : m ∈ Icc (x i₀) (y i₀)) :
((pi univ fun i ↦ Ioc (x i) (update y i₀ m i)) ∪
pi univ fun i ↦ Ioc (update x i₀ m i) (y i)) =
pi univ fun i ↦ Ioc (x i) (y i) := by
simp_rw [pi_univ_Ioc_update_left hm.1, pi_univ_Ioc_update_right hm.2, ← union_inter_distrib_right,
← setOf_or, le_or_lt, setOf_true, univ_inter]
/-- If `x`, `y`, `x'`, and `y'` are functions `Π i : ι, α i`, then
the set difference between the box `[x, y]` and the product of the open intervals `(x' i, y' i)`
is covered by the union of the following boxes: for each `i : ι`, we take
`[x, update y i (x' i)]` and `[update x i (y' i), y]`.
E.g., if `x' = x` and `y' = y`, then this lemma states that the difference between a closed box
`[x, y]` and the corresponding open box `{z | ∀ i, x i < z i < y i}` is covered by the union
of the faces of `[x, y]`. -/
theorem Icc_diff_pi_univ_Ioo_subset (x y x' y' : ∀ i, α i) :
(Icc x y \ pi univ fun i ↦ Ioo (x' i) (y' i)) ⊆
(⋃ i : ι, Icc x (update y i (x' i))) ∪ ⋃ i : ι, Icc (update x i (y' i)) y := by
rintro a ⟨⟨hxa, hay⟩, ha'⟩
simp only [mem_pi, mem_univ, mem_Ioo, true_implies, not_forall] at ha'
simp only [le_update_iff, update_le_iff, mem_union, mem_iUnion, mem_Icc,
hxa, hay _, hxa _, hay, ← exists_or]
rcases ha' with ⟨w, hw⟩
apply Exists.intro w
cases lt_or_le (x' w) (a w) <;> simp_all
/-- If `x`, `y`, `z` are functions `Π i : ι, α i`, then
the set difference between the box `[x, z]` and the product of the intervals `(y i, z i]`
| is covered by the union of the boxes `[x, update z i (y i)]`.
E.g., if `x = y`, then this lemma states that the difference between a closed box
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Set/Pi.lean | 301 | 303 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Paul Reichert. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Paul Reichert, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Affine.AddTorsorBases
/-!
# Intrinsic frontier and interior
This file defines the intrinsic frontier, interior and closure of a set in a normed additive torsor.
These are also known as relative frontier, interior, closure.
The intrinsic frontier/interior/closure of a set `s` is the frontier/interior/closure of `s`
considered as a set in its affine span.
The intrinsic interior is in general greater than the topological interior, the intrinsic frontier
in general less than the topological frontier, and the intrinsic closure in cases of interest the
same as the topological closure.
## Definitions
* `intrinsicInterior`: Intrinsic interior
* `intrinsicFrontier`: Intrinsic frontier
* `intrinsicClosure`: Intrinsic closure
## Results
The main results are:
* `AffineIsometry.image_intrinsicInterior`/`AffineIsometry.image_intrinsicFrontier`/
`AffineIsometry.image_intrinsicClosure`: Intrinsic interiors/frontiers/closures commute with
taking the image under an affine isometry.
* `Set.Nonempty.intrinsicInterior`: The intrinsic interior of a nonempty convex set is nonempty.
## References
* Chapter 8 of [Barry Simon, *Convexity*][simon2011]
* Chapter 1 of [Rolf Schneider, *Convex Bodies: The Brunn-Minkowski theory*][schneider2013].
## TODO
* `IsClosed s → IsExtreme 𝕜 s (intrinsicFrontier 𝕜 s)`
* `x ∈ s → y ∈ intrinsicInterior 𝕜 s → openSegment 𝕜 x y ⊆ intrinsicInterior 𝕜 s`
-/
open AffineSubspace Set Topology
open scoped Pointwise
variable {𝕜 V W Q P : Type*}
section AddTorsor
variable (𝕜) [Ring 𝕜] [AddCommGroup V] [Module 𝕜 V] [TopologicalSpace P] [AddTorsor V P]
{s t : Set P} {x : P}
/-- The intrinsic interior of a set is its interior considered as a set in its affine span. -/
def intrinsicInterior (s : Set P) : Set P :=
(↑) '' interior ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set <| affineSpan 𝕜 s)
/-- The intrinsic frontier of a set is its frontier considered as a set in its affine span. -/
def intrinsicFrontier (s : Set P) : Set P :=
(↑) '' frontier ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set <| affineSpan 𝕜 s)
/-- The intrinsic closure of a set is its closure considered as a set in its affine span. -/
def intrinsicClosure (s : Set P) : Set P :=
(↑) '' closure ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set <| affineSpan 𝕜 s)
variable {𝕜}
@[simp]
theorem mem_intrinsicInterior :
x ∈ intrinsicInterior 𝕜 s ↔ ∃ y, y ∈ interior ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set <| affineSpan 𝕜 s) ∧ ↑y = x :=
mem_image _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem mem_intrinsicFrontier :
x ∈ intrinsicFrontier 𝕜 s ↔ ∃ y, y ∈ frontier ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set <| affineSpan 𝕜 s) ∧ ↑y = x :=
mem_image _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem mem_intrinsicClosure :
x ∈ intrinsicClosure 𝕜 s ↔ ∃ y, y ∈ closure ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set <| affineSpan 𝕜 s) ∧ ↑y = x :=
mem_image _ _ _
theorem intrinsicInterior_subset : intrinsicInterior 𝕜 s ⊆ s :=
image_subset_iff.2 interior_subset
theorem intrinsicFrontier_subset (hs : IsClosed s) : intrinsicFrontier 𝕜 s ⊆ s :=
image_subset_iff.2 (hs.preimage continuous_induced_dom).frontier_subset
theorem intrinsicFrontier_subset_intrinsicClosure : intrinsicFrontier 𝕜 s ⊆ intrinsicClosure 𝕜 s :=
image_subset _ frontier_subset_closure
theorem subset_intrinsicClosure : s ⊆ intrinsicClosure 𝕜 s :=
fun x hx => ⟨⟨x, subset_affineSpan _ _ hx⟩, subset_closure hx, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem intrinsicInterior_empty : intrinsicInterior 𝕜 (∅ : Set P) = ∅ := by simp [intrinsicInterior]
@[simp]
theorem intrinsicFrontier_empty : intrinsicFrontier 𝕜 (∅ : Set P) = ∅ := by simp [intrinsicFrontier]
@[simp]
theorem intrinsicClosure_empty : intrinsicClosure 𝕜 (∅ : Set P) = ∅ := by simp [intrinsicClosure]
@[simp]
theorem intrinsicClosure_nonempty : (intrinsicClosure 𝕜 s).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty :=
⟨by simp_rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]; rintro h rfl; exact h intrinsicClosure_empty,
Nonempty.mono subset_intrinsicClosure⟩
alias ⟨Set.Nonempty.ofIntrinsicClosure, Set.Nonempty.intrinsicClosure⟩ := intrinsicClosure_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem intrinsicInterior_singleton (x : P) : intrinsicInterior 𝕜 ({x} : Set P) = {x} := by
simp only [intrinsicInterior, preimage_coe_affineSpan_singleton, interior_univ, image_univ,
Subtype.range_coe_subtype, mem_affineSpan_singleton, setOf_eq_eq_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem intrinsicFrontier_singleton (x : P) : intrinsicFrontier 𝕜 ({x} : Set P) = ∅ := by
rw [intrinsicFrontier, preimage_coe_affineSpan_singleton, frontier_univ, image_empty]
@[simp]
theorem intrinsicClosure_singleton (x : P) : intrinsicClosure 𝕜 ({x} : Set P) = {x} := by
simp only [intrinsicClosure, preimage_coe_affineSpan_singleton, closure_univ, image_univ,
Subtype.range_coe_subtype, mem_affineSpan_singleton, setOf_eq_eq_singleton]
/-!
Note that neither `intrinsicInterior` nor `intrinsicFrontier` is monotone.
-/
theorem intrinsicClosure_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : intrinsicClosure 𝕜 s ⊆ intrinsicClosure 𝕜 t := by
refine image_subset_iff.2 fun x hx => ?_
refine ⟨Set.inclusion (affineSpan_mono _ h) x, ?_, rfl⟩
refine (continuous_inclusion (affineSpan_mono _ h)).closure_preimage_subset _ (closure_mono ?_ hx)
exact fun y hy => h hy
theorem interior_subset_intrinsicInterior : interior s ⊆ intrinsicInterior 𝕜 s :=
fun x hx => ⟨⟨x, subset_affineSpan _ _ <| interior_subset hx⟩,
preimage_interior_subset_interior_preimage continuous_subtype_val hx, rfl⟩
theorem intrinsicClosure_subset_closure : intrinsicClosure 𝕜 s ⊆ closure s :=
image_subset_iff.2 <| continuous_subtype_val.closure_preimage_subset _
theorem intrinsicFrontier_subset_frontier : intrinsicFrontier 𝕜 s ⊆ frontier s :=
image_subset_iff.2 <| continuous_subtype_val.frontier_preimage_subset _
|
theorem intrinsicClosure_subset_affineSpan : intrinsicClosure 𝕜 s ⊆ affineSpan 𝕜 s :=
(image_subset_range _ _).trans Subtype.range_coe.subset
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Intrinsic.lean | 147 | 149 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Nat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Canonical
/-!
# Distance function on ℕ
This file defines a simple distance function on naturals from truncated subtraction.
-/
namespace Nat
/-- Distance (absolute value of difference) between natural numbers. -/
def dist (n m : ℕ) :=
n - m + (m - n)
theorem dist_comm (n m : ℕ) : dist n m = dist m n := by simp [dist, add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem dist_self (n : ℕ) : dist n n = 0 := by simp [dist, tsub_self]
theorem eq_of_dist_eq_zero {n m : ℕ} (h : dist n m = 0) : n = m :=
have : n - m = 0 := Nat.eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_right h
have : n ≤ m := tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.mp this
have : m - n = 0 := Nat.eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_left h
| have : m ≤ n := tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.mp this
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Dist.lean | 31 | 31 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Jeremy Avigad, Simon Hudon
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Notation.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Defs
/-!
# Partial values of a type
This file defines `Part α`, the partial values of a type.
`o : Part α` carries a proposition `o.Dom`, its domain, along with a function `get : o.Dom → α`, its
value. The rule is then that every partial value has a value but, to access it, you need to provide
a proof of the domain.
`Part α` behaves the same as `Option α` except that `o : Option α` is decidably `none` or `some a`
for some `a : α`, while the domain of `o : Part α` doesn't have to be decidable. That means you can
translate back and forth between a partial value with a decidable domain and an option, and
`Option α` and `Part α` are classically equivalent. In general, `Part α` is bigger than `Option α`.
In current mathlib, `Part ℕ`, aka `PartENat`, is used to move decidability of the order to
decidability of `PartENat.find` (which is the smallest natural satisfying a predicate, or `∞` if
there's none).
## Main declarations
`Option`-like declarations:
* `Part.none`: The partial value whose domain is `False`.
* `Part.some a`: The partial value whose domain is `True` and whose value is `a`.
* `Part.ofOption`: Converts an `Option α` to a `Part α` by sending `none` to `none` and `some a` to
`some a`.
* `Part.toOption`: Converts a `Part α` with a decidable domain to an `Option α`.
* `Part.equivOption`: Classical equivalence between `Part α` and `Option α`.
Monadic structure:
* `Part.bind`: `o.bind f` has value `(f (o.get _)).get _` (`f o` morally) and is defined when `o`
and `f (o.get _)` are defined.
* `Part.map`: Maps the value and keeps the same domain.
Other:
* `Part.restrict`: `Part.restrict p o` replaces the domain of `o : Part α` by `p : Prop` so long as
`p → o.Dom`.
* `Part.assert`: `assert p f` appends `p` to the domains of the values of a partial function.
* `Part.unwrap`: Gets the value of a partial value regardless of its domain. Unsound.
## Notation
For `a : α`, `o : Part α`, `a ∈ o` means that `o` is defined and equal to `a`. Formally, it means
`o.Dom` and `o.get _ = a`.
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function
/-- `Part α` is the type of "partial values" of type `α`. It
is similar to `Option α` except the domain condition can be an
arbitrary proposition, not necessarily decidable. -/
structure Part.{u} (α : Type u) : Type u where
/-- The domain of a partial value -/
Dom : Prop
/-- Extract a value from a partial value given a proof of `Dom` -/
get : Dom → α
namespace Part
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
/-- Convert a `Part α` with a decidable domain to an option -/
def toOption (o : Part α) [Decidable o.Dom] : Option α :=
if h : Dom o then some (o.get h) else none
@[simp] lemma toOption_isSome (o : Part α) [Decidable o.Dom] : o.toOption.isSome ↔ o.Dom := by
by_cases h : o.Dom <;> simp [h, toOption]
@[simp] lemma toOption_eq_none (o : Part α) [Decidable o.Dom] : o.toOption = none ↔ ¬o.Dom := by
by_cases h : o.Dom <;> simp [h, toOption]
/-- `Part` extensionality -/
theorem ext' : ∀ {o p : Part α}, (o.Dom ↔ p.Dom) → (∀ h₁ h₂, o.get h₁ = p.get h₂) → o = p
| ⟨od, o⟩, ⟨pd, p⟩, H1, H2 => by
have t : od = pd := propext H1
cases t; rw [show o = p from funext fun p => H2 p p]
/-- `Part` eta expansion -/
@[simp]
theorem eta : ∀ o : Part α, (⟨o.Dom, fun h => o.get h⟩ : Part α) = o
| ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
/-- `a ∈ o` means that `o` is defined and equal to `a` -/
protected def Mem (o : Part α) (a : α) : Prop :=
∃ h, o.get h = a
instance : Membership α (Part α) :=
⟨Part.Mem⟩
theorem mem_eq (a : α) (o : Part α) : (a ∈ o) = ∃ h, o.get h = a :=
rfl
theorem dom_iff_mem : ∀ {o : Part α}, o.Dom ↔ ∃ y, y ∈ o
| ⟨_, f⟩ => ⟨fun h => ⟨f h, h, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, h, rfl⟩ => h⟩
theorem get_mem {o : Part α} (h) : get o h ∈ o :=
⟨_, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk_iff {p : Prop} {o : p → α} {a : α} : a ∈ Part.mk p o ↔ ∃ h, o h = a :=
Iff.rfl
/-- `Part` extensionality -/
@[ext]
theorem ext {o p : Part α} (H : ∀ a, a ∈ o ↔ a ∈ p) : o = p :=
(ext' ⟨fun h => ((H _).1 ⟨h, rfl⟩).fst, fun h => ((H _).2 ⟨h, rfl⟩).fst⟩) fun _ _ =>
((H _).2 ⟨_, rfl⟩).snd
/-- The `none` value in `Part` has a `False` domain and an empty function. -/
def none : Part α :=
⟨False, False.rec⟩
instance : Inhabited (Part α) :=
⟨none⟩
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_none (a : α) : a ∉ @none α := fun h => h.fst
/-- The `some a` value in `Part` has a `True` domain and the
function returns `a`. -/
def some (a : α) : Part α :=
⟨True, fun _ => a⟩
@[simp]
theorem some_dom (a : α) : (some a).Dom :=
trivial
theorem mem_unique : ∀ {a b : α} {o : Part α}, a ∈ o → b ∈ o → a = b
| _, _, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, rfl⟩, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => rfl
theorem mem_right_unique : ∀ {a : α} {o p : Part α}, a ∈ o → a ∈ p → o = p
| _, _, _, ⟨ho, _⟩, ⟨hp, _⟩ => ext' (iff_of_true ho hp) (by simp [*])
theorem Mem.left_unique : Relator.LeftUnique ((· ∈ ·) : α → Part α → Prop) := fun _ _ _ =>
mem_unique
theorem Mem.right_unique : Relator.RightUnique ((· ∈ ·) : α → Part α → Prop) := fun _ _ _ =>
mem_right_unique
theorem get_eq_of_mem {o : Part α} {a} (h : a ∈ o) (h') : get o h' = a :=
mem_unique ⟨_, rfl⟩ h
protected theorem subsingleton (o : Part α) : Set.Subsingleton { a | a ∈ o } := fun _ ha _ hb =>
mem_unique ha hb
@[simp]
theorem get_some {a : α} (ha : (some a).Dom) : get (some a) ha = a :=
rfl
theorem mem_some (a : α) : a ∈ some a :=
⟨trivial, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_some_iff {a b} : b ∈ (some a : Part α) ↔ b = a :=
⟨fun ⟨_, e⟩ => e.symm, fun e => ⟨trivial, e.symm⟩⟩
theorem eq_some_iff {a : α} {o : Part α} : o = some a ↔ a ∈ o :=
⟨fun e => e.symm ▸ mem_some _, fun ⟨h, e⟩ => e ▸ ext' (iff_true_intro h) fun _ _ => rfl⟩
theorem eq_none_iff {o : Part α} : o = none ↔ ∀ a, a ∉ o :=
⟨fun e => e.symm ▸ not_mem_none, fun h => ext (by simpa)⟩
theorem eq_none_iff' {o : Part α} : o = none ↔ ¬o.Dom :=
⟨fun e => e.symm ▸ id, fun h => eq_none_iff.2 fun _ h' => h h'.fst⟩
@[simp]
theorem not_none_dom : ¬(none : Part α).Dom :=
id
@[simp]
theorem some_ne_none (x : α) : some x ≠ none := by
intro h
exact true_ne_false (congr_arg Dom h)
@[simp]
theorem none_ne_some (x : α) : none ≠ some x :=
(some_ne_none x).symm
theorem ne_none_iff {o : Part α} : o ≠ none ↔ ∃ x, o = some x := by
constructor
· rw [Ne, eq_none_iff', not_not]
exact fun h => ⟨o.get h, eq_some_iff.2 (get_mem h)⟩
· rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩
apply some_ne_none
theorem eq_none_or_eq_some (o : Part α) : o = none ∨ ∃ x, o = some x :=
or_iff_not_imp_left.2 ne_none_iff.1
theorem some_injective : Injective (@Part.some α) := fun _ _ h =>
congr_fun (eq_of_heq (Part.mk.inj h).2) trivial
@[simp]
theorem some_inj {a b : α} : Part.some a = some b ↔ a = b :=
some_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem some_get {a : Part α} (ha : a.Dom) : Part.some (Part.get a ha) = a :=
Eq.symm (eq_some_iff.2 ⟨ha, rfl⟩)
theorem get_eq_iff_eq_some {a : Part α} {ha : a.Dom} {b : α} : a.get ha = b ↔ a = some b :=
⟨fun h => by simp [h.symm], fun h => by simp [h]⟩
theorem get_eq_get_of_eq (a : Part α) (ha : a.Dom) {b : Part α} (h : a = b) :
a.get ha = b.get (h ▸ ha) := by
congr
theorem get_eq_iff_mem {o : Part α} {a : α} (h : o.Dom) : o.get h = a ↔ a ∈ o :=
⟨fun H => ⟨h, H⟩, fun ⟨_, H⟩ => H⟩
theorem eq_get_iff_mem {o : Part α} {a : α} (h : o.Dom) : a = o.get h ↔ a ∈ o :=
eq_comm.trans (get_eq_iff_mem h)
@[simp]
theorem none_toOption [Decidable (@none α).Dom] : (none : Part α).toOption = Option.none :=
dif_neg id
@[simp]
theorem some_toOption (a : α) [Decidable (some a).Dom] : (some a).toOption = Option.some a :=
dif_pos trivial
instance noneDecidable : Decidable (@none α).Dom :=
instDecidableFalse
instance someDecidable (a : α) : Decidable (some a).Dom :=
instDecidableTrue
/-- Retrieves the value of `a : Part α` if it exists, and return the provided default value
otherwise. -/
def getOrElse (a : Part α) [Decidable a.Dom] (d : α) :=
if ha : a.Dom then a.get ha else d
theorem getOrElse_of_dom (a : Part α) (h : a.Dom) [Decidable a.Dom] (d : α) :
getOrElse a d = a.get h :=
dif_pos h
theorem getOrElse_of_not_dom (a : Part α) (h : ¬a.Dom) [Decidable a.Dom] (d : α) :
getOrElse a d = d :=
dif_neg h
@[simp]
theorem getOrElse_none (d : α) [Decidable (none : Part α).Dom] : getOrElse none d = d :=
none.getOrElse_of_not_dom not_none_dom d
@[simp]
theorem getOrElse_some (a : α) (d : α) [Decidable (some a).Dom] : getOrElse (some a) d = a :=
(some a).getOrElse_of_dom (some_dom a) d
-- `simp`-normal form is `toOption_eq_some_iff`.
theorem mem_toOption {o : Part α} [Decidable o.Dom] {a : α} : a ∈ toOption o ↔ a ∈ o := by
unfold toOption
by_cases h : o.Dom <;> simp [h]
· exact ⟨fun h => ⟨_, h⟩, fun ⟨_, h⟩ => h⟩
· exact mt Exists.fst h
@[simp]
theorem toOption_eq_some_iff {o : Part α} [Decidable o.Dom] {a : α} :
toOption o = Option.some a ↔ a ∈ o := by
rw [← Option.mem_def, mem_toOption]
protected theorem Dom.toOption {o : Part α} [Decidable o.Dom] (h : o.Dom) : o.toOption = o.get h :=
dif_pos h
theorem toOption_eq_none_iff {a : Part α} [Decidable a.Dom] : a.toOption = Option.none ↔ ¬a.Dom :=
Ne.dite_eq_right_iff fun _ => Option.some_ne_none _
@[simp]
theorem elim_toOption {α β : Type*} (a : Part α) [Decidable a.Dom] (b : β) (f : α → β) :
a.toOption.elim b f = if h : a.Dom then f (a.get h) else b := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [h.toOption]
rfl
· rw [Part.toOption_eq_none_iff.2 h]
rfl
/-- Converts an `Option α` into a `Part α`. -/
@[coe]
def ofOption : Option α → Part α
| Option.none => none
| Option.some a => some a
@[simp]
theorem mem_ofOption {a : α} : ∀ {o : Option α}, a ∈ ofOption o ↔ a ∈ o
| Option.none => ⟨fun h => h.fst.elim, fun h => Option.noConfusion h⟩
| Option.some _ => ⟨fun h => congr_arg Option.some h.snd, fun h => ⟨trivial, Option.some.inj h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem ofOption_dom {α} : ∀ o : Option α, (ofOption o).Dom ↔ o.isSome
| Option.none => by simp [ofOption, none]
| Option.some a => by simp [ofOption]
theorem ofOption_eq_get {α} (o : Option α) : ofOption o = ⟨_, @Option.get _ o⟩ :=
Part.ext' (ofOption_dom o) fun h₁ h₂ => by
cases o
· simp at h₂
· rfl
instance : Coe (Option α) (Part α) :=
⟨ofOption⟩
theorem mem_coe {a : α} {o : Option α} : a ∈ (o : Part α) ↔ a ∈ o :=
mem_ofOption
@[simp]
theorem coe_none : (@Option.none α : Part α) = none :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_some (a : α) : (Option.some a : Part α) = some a :=
rfl
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {P : Part α → Prop} (a : Part α) (hnone : P none)
(hsome : ∀ a : α, P (some a)) : P a :=
(Classical.em a.Dom).elim (fun h => Part.some_get h ▸ hsome _) fun h =>
(eq_none_iff'.2 h).symm ▸ hnone
instance ofOptionDecidable : ∀ o : Option α, Decidable (ofOption o).Dom
| Option.none => Part.noneDecidable
| Option.some a => Part.someDecidable a
@[simp]
theorem to_ofOption (o : Option α) : toOption (ofOption o) = o := by cases o <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem of_toOption (o : Part α) [Decidable o.Dom] : ofOption (toOption o) = o :=
ext fun _ => mem_ofOption.trans mem_toOption
/-- `Part α` is (classically) equivalent to `Option α`. -/
noncomputable def equivOption : Part α ≃ Option α :=
haveI := Classical.dec
⟨fun o => toOption o, ofOption, fun o => of_toOption o, fun o =>
Eq.trans (by dsimp; congr) (to_ofOption o)⟩
/-- We give `Part α` the order where everything is greater than `none`. -/
instance : PartialOrder (Part
α) where
le x y := ∀ i, i ∈ x → i ∈ y
le_refl _ _ := id
le_trans _ _ _ f g _ := g _ ∘ f _
le_antisymm _ _ f g := Part.ext fun _ => ⟨f _, g _⟩
instance : OrderBot (Part α) where
bot := none
bot_le := by rintro x _ ⟨⟨_⟩, _⟩
theorem le_total_of_le_of_le {x y : Part α} (z : Part α) (hx : x ≤ z) (hy : y ≤ z) :
x ≤ y ∨ y ≤ x := by
rcases Part.eq_none_or_eq_some x with (h | ⟨b, h₀⟩)
· rw [h]
left
apply OrderBot.bot_le _
right; intro b' h₁
rw [Part.eq_some_iff] at h₀
have hx := hx _ h₀; have hy := hy _ h₁
have hx := Part.mem_unique hx hy; subst hx
exact h₀
/-- `assert p f` is a bind-like operation which appends an additional condition
`p` to the domain and uses `f` to produce the value. -/
def assert (p : Prop) (f : p → Part α) : Part α :=
⟨∃ h : p, (f h).Dom, fun ha => (f ha.fst).get ha.snd⟩
/-- The bind operation has value `g (f.get)`, and is defined when all the
parts are defined. -/
protected def bind (f : Part α) (g : α → Part β) : Part β :=
assert (Dom f) fun b => g (f.get b)
/-- The map operation for `Part` just maps the value and maintains the same domain. -/
@[simps]
def map (f : α → β) (o : Part α) : Part β :=
⟨o.Dom, f ∘ o.get⟩
theorem mem_map (f : α → β) {o : Part α} : ∀ {a}, a ∈ o → f a ∈ map f o
| _, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => ⟨_, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_map_iff (f : α → β) {o : Part α} {b} : b ∈ map f o ↔ ∃ a ∈ o, f a = b :=
⟨fun hb => match b, hb with
| _, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => ⟨_, ⟨_, rfl⟩, rfl⟩,
fun ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩ => h₂ ▸ mem_map f h₁⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_none (f : α → β) : map f none = none :=
eq_none_iff.2 fun a => by simp
@[simp]
theorem map_some (f : α → β) (a : α) : map f (some a) = some (f a) :=
eq_some_iff.2 <| mem_map f <| mem_some _
theorem mem_assert {p : Prop} {f : p → Part α} : ∀ {a} (h : p), a ∈ f h → a ∈ assert p f
| _, x, ⟨h, rfl⟩ => ⟨⟨x, h⟩, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_assert_iff {p : Prop} {f : p → Part α} {a} : a ∈ assert p f ↔ ∃ h : p, a ∈ f h :=
⟨fun ha => match a, ha with
| _, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => ⟨_, ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩,
fun ⟨_, h⟩ => mem_assert _ h⟩
theorem assert_pos {p : Prop} {f : p → Part α} (h : p) : assert p f = f h := by
dsimp [assert]
cases h' : f h
simp only [h', mk.injEq, h, exists_prop_of_true, true_and]
apply Function.hfunext
· simp only [h, h', exists_prop_of_true]
· simp
theorem assert_neg {p : Prop} {f : p → Part α} (h : ¬p) : assert p f = none := by
dsimp [assert, none]; congr
· simp only [h, not_false_iff, exists_prop_of_false]
· apply Function.hfunext
· simp only [h, not_false_iff, exists_prop_of_false]
simp at *
theorem mem_bind {f : Part α} {g : α → Part β} : ∀ {a b}, a ∈ f → b ∈ g a → b ∈ f.bind g
| _, _, ⟨h, rfl⟩, ⟨h₂, rfl⟩ => ⟨⟨h, h₂⟩, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_bind_iff {f : Part α} {g : α → Part β} {b} : b ∈ f.bind g ↔ ∃ a ∈ f, b ∈ g a :=
⟨fun hb => match b, hb with
| _, ⟨⟨_, _⟩, rfl⟩ => ⟨_, ⟨_, rfl⟩, ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩,
fun ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩ => mem_bind h₁ h₂⟩
protected theorem Dom.bind {o : Part α} (h : o.Dom) (f : α → Part β) : o.bind f = f (o.get h) := by
ext b
simp only [Part.mem_bind_iff, exists_prop]
refine ⟨?_, fun hb => ⟨o.get h, Part.get_mem _, hb⟩⟩
rintro ⟨a, ha, hb⟩
rwa [Part.get_eq_of_mem ha]
theorem Dom.of_bind {f : α → Part β} {a : Part α} (h : (a.bind f).Dom) : a.Dom :=
h.1
@[simp]
theorem bind_none (f : α → Part β) : none.bind f = none :=
eq_none_iff.2 fun a => by simp
@[simp]
theorem bind_some (a : α) (f : α → Part β) : (some a).bind f = f a :=
ext <| by simp
theorem bind_of_mem {o : Part α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ o) (f : α → Part β) : o.bind f = f a := by
rw [eq_some_iff.2 h, bind_some]
theorem bind_some_eq_map (f : α → β) (x : Part α) : x.bind (fun y => some (f y)) = map f x :=
ext <| by simp [eq_comm]
theorem bind_toOption (f : α → Part β) (o : Part α) [Decidable o.Dom] [∀ a, Decidable (f a).Dom]
[Decidable (o.bind f).Dom] :
(o.bind f).toOption = o.toOption.elim Option.none fun a => (f a).toOption := by
by_cases h : o.Dom
· simp_rw [h.toOption, h.bind]
rfl
· rw [Part.toOption_eq_none_iff.2 h]
exact Part.toOption_eq_none_iff.2 fun ho => h ho.of_bind
theorem bind_assoc {γ} (f : Part α) (g : α → Part β) (k : β → Part γ) :
(f.bind g).bind k = f.bind fun x => (g x).bind k :=
ext fun a => by
simp only [mem_bind_iff]
exact ⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩, h₃⟩ => ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, h₃⟩,
fun ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, h₃⟩ => ⟨_, ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩, h₃⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem bind_map {γ} (f : α → β) (x) (g : β → Part γ) :
(map f x).bind g = x.bind fun y => g (f y) := by rw [← bind_some_eq_map, bind_assoc]; simp
@[simp]
theorem map_bind {γ} (f : α → Part β) (x : Part α) (g : β → γ) :
map g (x.bind f) = x.bind fun y => map g (f y) := by
rw [← bind_some_eq_map, bind_assoc]; simp [bind_some_eq_map]
theorem map_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) (o : Part α) : map g (map f o) = map (g ∘ f) o := by
simp [map, Function.comp_assoc]
instance : Monad Part where
pure := @some
map := @map
bind := @Part.bind
instance : LawfulMonad
Part where
bind_pure_comp := @bind_some_eq_map
id_map f := by cases f; rfl
pure_bind := @bind_some
bind_assoc := @bind_assoc
map_const := by simp [Functor.mapConst, Functor.map]
--Porting TODO : In Lean3 these were automatic by a tactic
seqLeft_eq x y := ext'
(by simp [SeqLeft.seqLeft, Part.bind, assert, Seq.seq, const, (· <$> ·), and_comm])
(fun _ _ => rfl)
seqRight_eq x y := ext'
(by simp [SeqRight.seqRight, Part.bind, assert, Seq.seq, const, (· <$> ·), and_comm])
(fun _ _ => rfl)
pure_seq x y := ext'
(by simp [Seq.seq, Part.bind, assert, (· <$> ·), pure])
(fun _ _ => rfl)
bind_map x y := ext'
(by simp [(· >>= ·), Part.bind, assert, Seq.seq, get, (· <$> ·)] )
(fun _ _ => rfl)
theorem map_id' {f : α → α} (H : ∀ x : α, f x = x) (o) : map f o = o := by
rw [show f = id from funext H]; exact id_map o
@[simp]
theorem bind_some_right (x : Part α) : x.bind some = x := by
rw [bind_some_eq_map]
simp [map_id']
@[simp]
theorem pure_eq_some (a : α) : pure a = some a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ret_eq_some (a : α) : (return a : Part α) = some a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (o : Part α) : f <$> o = map f o :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bind_eq_bind {α β} (f : Part α) (g : α → Part β) : f >>= g = f.bind g :=
rfl
theorem bind_le {α} (x : Part α) (f : α → Part β) (y : Part β) :
x >>= f ≤ y ↔ ∀ a, a ∈ x → f a ≤ y := by
constructor <;> intro h
· intro a h' b
have h := h b
simp only [and_imp, exists_prop, bind_eq_bind, mem_bind_iff, exists_imp] at h
apply h _ h'
· intro b h'
simp only [exists_prop, bind_eq_bind, mem_bind_iff] at h'
rcases h' with ⟨a, h₀, h₁⟩
apply h _ h₀ _ h₁
-- TODO: if `MonadFail` is defined, define the below instance.
-- instance : MonadFail Part :=
-- { Part.monad with fail := fun _ _ => none }
/-- `restrict p o h` replaces the domain of `o` with `p`, and is well defined when
`p` implies `o` is defined. -/
def restrict (p : Prop) (o : Part α) (H : p → o.Dom) : Part α :=
⟨p, fun h => o.get (H h)⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_restrict (p : Prop) (o : Part α) (h : p → o.Dom) (a : α) :
a ∈ restrict p o h ↔ p ∧ a ∈ o := by
dsimp [restrict, mem_eq]; constructor
· rintro ⟨h₀, h₁⟩
exact ⟨h₀, ⟨_, h₁⟩⟩
rintro ⟨h₀, _, h₂⟩; exact ⟨h₀, h₂⟩
|
/-- `unwrap o` gets the value at `o`, ignoring the condition. This function is unsound. -/
unsafe def unwrap (o : Part α) : α :=
| Mathlib/Data/Part.lean | 553 | 555 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Comma.Arrow
import Mathlib.Order.CompleteBooleanAlgebra
/-!
# Properties of morphisms
We provide the basic framework for talking about properties of morphisms.
The following meta-property is defined
* `RespectsLeft P Q`: `P` respects the property `Q` on the left if `P f → P (i ≫ f)` where
`i` satisfies `Q`.
* `RespectsRight P Q`: `P` respects the property `Q` on the right if `P f → P (f ≫ i)` where
`i` satisfies `Q`.
* `Respects`: `P` respects `Q` if `P` respects `Q` both on the left and on the right.
-/
universe w v v' u u'
open CategoryTheory Opposite
noncomputable section
namespace CategoryTheory
variable (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] {D : Type*} [Category D]
/-- A `MorphismProperty C` is a class of morphisms between objects in `C`. -/
def MorphismProperty :=
∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (_ : X ⟶ Y), Prop
instance : CompleteBooleanAlgebra (MorphismProperty C) where
le P₁ P₂ := ∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (f : X ⟶ Y), P₁ f → P₂ f
__ := inferInstanceAs (CompleteBooleanAlgebra (∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (_ : X ⟶ Y), Prop))
lemma MorphismProperty.le_def {P Q : MorphismProperty C} :
P ≤ Q ↔ ∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), P f → Q f := Iff.rfl
instance : Inhabited (MorphismProperty C) :=
⟨⊤⟩
lemma MorphismProperty.top_eq : (⊤ : MorphismProperty C) = fun _ _ _ => True := rfl
variable {C}
namespace MorphismProperty
@[ext]
lemma ext (W W' : MorphismProperty C) (h : ∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (f : X ⟶ Y), W f ↔ W' f) :
W = W' := by
funext X Y f
rw [h]
@[simp]
lemma top_apply {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : (⊤ : MorphismProperty C) f := by
simp only [top_eq]
lemma of_eq_top {P : MorphismProperty C} (h : P = ⊤) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : P f := by
simp [h]
@[simp]
lemma sSup_iff (S : Set (MorphismProperty C)) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
sSup S f ↔ ∃ (W : S), W.1 f := by
dsimp [sSup, iSup]
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, ⟨⟨_, ⟨⟨_, ⟨_, h⟩, rfl⟩, rfl⟩⟩, rfl⟩, hf⟩
exact ⟨⟨_, h⟩, hf⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨W, hW⟩, hf⟩
exact ⟨_, ⟨⟨_, ⟨_, ⟨⟨W, hW⟩, rfl⟩⟩, rfl⟩, rfl⟩, hf⟩
@[simp]
lemma iSup_iff {ι : Sort*} (W : ι → MorphismProperty C) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
iSup W f ↔ ∃ i, W i f := by
apply (sSup_iff (Set.range W) f).trans
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨_, i, rfl⟩, hf⟩
exact ⟨i, hf⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hf⟩
exact ⟨⟨_, i, rfl⟩, hf⟩
/-- The morphism property in `Cᵒᵖ` associated to a morphism property in `C` -/
@[simp]
def op (P : MorphismProperty C) : MorphismProperty Cᵒᵖ := fun _ _ f => P f.unop
/-- The morphism property in `C` associated to a morphism property in `Cᵒᵖ` -/
@[simp]
def unop (P : MorphismProperty Cᵒᵖ) : MorphismProperty C := fun _ _ f => P f.op
theorem unop_op (P : MorphismProperty C) : P.op.unop = P :=
rfl
theorem op_unop (P : MorphismProperty Cᵒᵖ) : P.unop.op = P :=
rfl
/-- The inverse image of a `MorphismProperty D` by a functor `C ⥤ D` -/
def inverseImage (P : MorphismProperty D) (F : C ⥤ D) : MorphismProperty C := fun _ _ f =>
P (F.map f)
@[simp]
lemma inverseImage_iff (P : MorphismProperty D) (F : C ⥤ D) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
P.inverseImage F f ↔ P (F.map f) := by rfl
/-- The image (up to isomorphisms) of a `MorphismProperty C` by a functor `C ⥤ D` -/
def map (P : MorphismProperty C) (F : C ⥤ D) : MorphismProperty D := fun _ _ f =>
∃ (X' Y' : C) (f' : X' ⟶ Y') (_ : P f'), Nonempty (Arrow.mk (F.map f') ≅ Arrow.mk f)
lemma map_mem_map (P : MorphismProperty C) (F : C ⥤ D) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (hf : P f) :
(P.map F) (F.map f) := ⟨X, Y, f, hf, ⟨Iso.refl _⟩⟩
lemma monotone_map (F : C ⥤ D) :
Monotone (map · F) := by
intro P Q h X Y f ⟨X', Y', f', hf', ⟨e⟩⟩
exact ⟨X', Y', f', h _ hf', ⟨e⟩⟩
section
variable (P : MorphismProperty C)
/-- The set in `Set (Arrow C)` which corresponds to `P : MorphismProperty C`. -/
def toSet : Set (Arrow C) := setOf (fun f ↦ P f.hom)
/-- The family of morphisms indexed by `P.toSet` which corresponds
to `P : MorphismProperty C`, see `MorphismProperty.ofHoms_homFamily`. -/
def homFamily (f : P.toSet) : f.1.left ⟶ f.1.right := f.1.hom
lemma homFamily_apply (f : P.toSet) : P.homFamily f = f.1.hom := rfl
@[simp]
lemma homFamily_arrow_mk {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (hf : P f) :
P.homFamily ⟨Arrow.mk f, hf⟩ = f := rfl
@[simp]
lemma arrow_mk_mem_toSet_iff {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Arrow.mk f ∈ P.toSet ↔ P f := Iff.rfl
lemma of_eq {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} (hf : P f)
{X' Y' : C} {f' : X' ⟶ Y'}
(hX : X = X') (hY : Y = Y') (h : f' = eqToHom hX.symm ≫ f ≫ eqToHom hY) :
P f' := by
rw [← P.arrow_mk_mem_toSet_iff] at hf ⊢
rwa [(Arrow.mk_eq_mk_iff f' f).2 ⟨hX.symm, hY.symm, h⟩]
end
/-- The class of morphisms given by a family of morphisms `f i : X i ⟶ Y i`. -/
inductive ofHoms {ι : Type*} {X Y : ι → C} (f : ∀ i, X i ⟶ Y i) : MorphismProperty C
| mk (i : ι) : ofHoms f (f i)
lemma ofHoms_iff {ι : Type*} {X Y : ι → C} (f : ∀ i, X i ⟶ Y i) {A B : C} (g : A ⟶ B) :
ofHoms f g ↔ ∃ i, Arrow.mk g = Arrow.mk (f i) := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨i⟩
exact ⟨i, rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨i, h⟩
rw [← (ofHoms f).arrow_mk_mem_toSet_iff, h, arrow_mk_mem_toSet_iff]
constructor
@[simp]
lemma ofHoms_homFamily (P : MorphismProperty C) : ofHoms P.homFamily = P := by
ext _ _ f
constructor
· intro hf
rw [ofHoms_iff] at hf
obtain ⟨⟨f, hf⟩, ⟨_, _⟩⟩ := hf
exact hf
· intro hf
exact ⟨(⟨f, hf⟩ : P.toSet)⟩
/-- A morphism property `P` satisfies `P.RespectsRight Q` if it is stable under post-composition
with morphisms satisfying `Q`, i.e. whenever `P` holds for `f` and `Q` holds for `i` then `P`
holds for `f ≫ i`. -/
class RespectsRight (P Q : MorphismProperty C) : Prop where
postcomp {X Y Z : C} (i : Y ⟶ Z) (hi : Q i) (f : X ⟶ Y) (hf : P f) : P (f ≫ i)
/-- A morphism property `P` satisfies `P.RespectsLeft Q` if it is stable under
pre-composition with morphisms satisfying `Q`, i.e. whenever `P` holds for `f`
and `Q` holds for `i` then `P` holds for `i ≫ f`. -/
class RespectsLeft (P Q : MorphismProperty C) : Prop where
precomp {X Y Z : C} (i : X ⟶ Y) (hi : Q i) (f : Y ⟶ Z) (hf : P f) : P (i ≫ f)
/-- A morphism property `P` satisfies `P.Respects Q` if it is stable under composition on the
left and right by morphisms satisfying `Q`. -/
class Respects (P Q : MorphismProperty C) : Prop extends P.RespectsLeft Q, P.RespectsRight Q where
instance (P Q : MorphismProperty C) [P.RespectsLeft Q] [P.RespectsRight Q] : P.Respects Q where
instance (P Q : MorphismProperty C) [P.RespectsLeft Q] : P.op.RespectsRight Q.op where
postcomp i hi f hf := RespectsLeft.precomp (Q := Q) i.unop hi f.unop hf
instance (P Q : MorphismProperty C) [P.RespectsRight Q] : P.op.RespectsLeft Q.op where
precomp i hi f hf := RespectsRight.postcomp (Q := Q) i.unop hi f.unop hf
instance RespectsLeft.inf (P₁ P₂ Q : MorphismProperty C) [P₁.RespectsLeft Q]
[P₂.RespectsLeft Q] : (P₁ ⊓ P₂).RespectsLeft Q where
precomp i hi f hf := ⟨precomp i hi f hf.left, precomp i hi f hf.right⟩
instance RespectsRight.inf (P₁ P₂ Q : MorphismProperty C) [P₁.RespectsRight Q]
[P₂.RespectsRight Q] : (P₁ ⊓ P₂).RespectsRight Q where
postcomp i hi f hf := ⟨postcomp i hi f hf.left, postcomp i hi f hf.right⟩
variable (C)
/-- The `MorphismProperty C` satisfied by isomorphisms in `C`. -/
def isomorphisms : MorphismProperty C := fun _ _ f => IsIso f
/-- The `MorphismProperty C` satisfied by monomorphisms in `C`. -/
def monomorphisms : MorphismProperty C := fun _ _ f => Mono f
/-- The `MorphismProperty C` satisfied by epimorphisms in `C`. -/
def epimorphisms : MorphismProperty C := fun _ _ f => Epi f
section
variable {C}
/-- `P` respects isomorphisms, if it respects the morphism property `isomorphisms C`, i.e.
it is stable under pre- and postcomposition with isomorphisms. -/
abbrev RespectsIso (P : MorphismProperty C) : Prop := P.Respects (isomorphisms C)
lemma RespectsIso.mk (P : MorphismProperty C)
(hprecomp : ∀ {X Y Z : C} (e : X ≅ Y) (f : Y ⟶ Z) (_ : P f), P (e.hom ≫ f))
(hpostcomp : ∀ {X Y Z : C} (e : Y ≅ Z) (f : X ⟶ Y) (_ : P f), P (f ≫ e.hom)) :
P.RespectsIso where
precomp e (_ : IsIso e) f hf := hprecomp (asIso e) f hf
postcomp e (_ : IsIso e) f hf := hpostcomp (asIso e) f hf
lemma RespectsIso.precomp (P : MorphismProperty C) [P.RespectsIso] {X Y Z : C} (e : X ⟶ Y)
[IsIso e] (f : Y ⟶ Z) (hf : P f) : P (e ≫ f) :=
RespectsLeft.precomp (Q := isomorphisms C) e ‹IsIso e› f hf
instance : RespectsIso (⊤ : MorphismProperty C) where
precomp _ _ _ _ := trivial
postcomp _ _ _ _ := trivial
lemma RespectsIso.postcomp (P : MorphismProperty C) [P.RespectsIso] {X Y Z : C} (e : Y ⟶ Z)
[IsIso e] (f : X ⟶ Y) (hf : P f) : P (f ≫ e) :=
RespectsRight.postcomp (Q := isomorphisms C) e ‹IsIso e› f hf
instance RespectsIso.op (P : MorphismProperty C) [RespectsIso P] : RespectsIso P.op where
precomp e (_ : IsIso e) f hf := postcomp P e.unop f.unop hf
postcomp e (_ : IsIso e) f hf := precomp P e.unop f.unop hf
instance RespectsIso.unop (P : MorphismProperty Cᵒᵖ) [RespectsIso P] : RespectsIso P.unop where
precomp e (_ : IsIso e) f hf := postcomp P e.op f.op hf
postcomp e (_ : IsIso e) f hf := precomp P e.op f.op hf
/-- The closure by isomorphisms of a `MorphismProperty` -/
def isoClosure (P : MorphismProperty C) : MorphismProperty C :=
fun _ _ f => ∃ (Y₁ Y₂ : C) (f' : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) (_ : P f'), Nonempty (Arrow.mk f' ≅ Arrow.mk f)
lemma le_isoClosure (P : MorphismProperty C) : P ≤ P.isoClosure :=
fun _ _ f hf => ⟨_, _, f, hf, ⟨Iso.refl _⟩⟩
instance isoClosure_respectsIso (P : MorphismProperty C) :
RespectsIso P.isoClosure where
precomp := fun e (he : IsIso e) f ⟨_, _, f', hf', ⟨iso⟩⟩ => ⟨_, _, f', hf',
⟨Arrow.isoMk (asIso iso.hom.left ≪≫ asIso (inv e)) (asIso iso.hom.right) (by simp)⟩⟩
postcomp := fun e (he : IsIso e) f ⟨_, _, f', hf', ⟨iso⟩⟩ => ⟨_, _, f', hf',
⟨Arrow.isoMk (asIso iso.hom.left) (asIso iso.hom.right ≪≫ asIso e) (by simp)⟩⟩
lemma monotone_isoClosure : Monotone (isoClosure (C := C)) := by
intro P Q h X Y f ⟨X', Y', f', hf', ⟨e⟩⟩
exact ⟨X', Y', f', h _ hf', ⟨e⟩⟩
theorem cancel_left_of_respectsIso (P : MorphismProperty C) [hP : RespectsIso P] {X Y Z : C}
(f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] : P (f ≫ g) ↔ P g :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using RespectsIso.precomp P (inv f) (f ≫ g) h, RespectsIso.precomp P f g⟩
theorem cancel_right_of_respectsIso (P : MorphismProperty C) [hP : RespectsIso P] {X Y Z : C}
(f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso g] : P (f ≫ g) ↔ P f :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using RespectsIso.postcomp P (inv g) (f ≫ g) h, RespectsIso.postcomp P g f⟩
lemma comma_iso_iff (P : MorphismProperty C) [P.RespectsIso] {A B : Type*} [Category A] [Category B]
{L : A ⥤ C} {R : B ⥤ C} {f g : Comma L R} (e : f ≅ g) :
P f.hom ↔ P g.hom := by
simp [← Comma.inv_left_hom_right e.hom, cancel_left_of_respectsIso, cancel_right_of_respectsIso]
theorem arrow_iso_iff (P : MorphismProperty C) [RespectsIso P] {f g : Arrow C}
(e : f ≅ g) : P f.hom ↔ P g.hom :=
| P.comma_iso_iff e
theorem arrow_mk_iso_iff (P : MorphismProperty C) [RespectsIso P] {W X Y Z : C}
{f : W ⟶ X} {g : Y ⟶ Z} (e : Arrow.mk f ≅ Arrow.mk g) : P f ↔ P g :=
P.arrow_iso_iff e
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/MorphismProperty/Basic.lean | 285 | 290 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Hanting Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Hanting Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Splits
import Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPolynomial.Symmetric.Defs
/-!
# Vieta's Formula
The main result is `Multiset.prod_X_add_C_eq_sum_esymm`, which shows that the product of
linear terms `X + λ` with `λ` in a `Multiset s` is equal to a linear combination of the
symmetric functions `esymm s`.
From this, we deduce `MvPolynomial.prod_X_add_C_eq_sum_esymm` which is the equivalent formula
for the product of linear terms `X + X i` with `i` in a `Fintype σ` as a linear combination
of the symmetric polynomials `esymm σ R j`.
For `R` be an integral domain (so that `p.roots` is defined for any `p : R[X]` as a multiset),
we derive `Polynomial.coeff_eq_esymm_roots_of_card`, the relationship between the coefficients and
the roots of `p` for a polynomial `p` that splits (i.e. having as many roots as its degree).
-/
open Finset Polynomial
namespace Multiset
section Semiring
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
/-- A sum version of **Vieta's formula** for `Multiset`: the product of the linear terms `X + λ`
where `λ` runs through a multiset `s` is equal to a linear combination of the symmetric functions
`esymm s` of the `λ`'s . -/
theorem prod_X_add_C_eq_sum_esymm (s : Multiset R) :
(s.map fun r => X + C r).prod =
∑ j ∈ Finset.range (Multiset.card s + 1), (C (s.esymm j) * X ^ (Multiset.card s - j)) := by
classical
rw [prod_map_add, antidiagonal_eq_map_powerset, map_map, ← bind_powerset_len,
map_bind, sum_bind, Finset.sum_eq_multiset_sum, Finset.range_val, map_congr (Eq.refl _)]
intro _ _
rw [esymm, ← sum_hom', ← sum_map_mul_right, map_congr (Eq.refl _)]
intro s ht
rw [mem_powersetCard] at ht
dsimp
rw [prod_hom' s (Polynomial.C : R →+* R[X])]
simp [ht, map_const, prod_replicate, prod_hom', map_id', card_sub]
/-- Vieta's formula for the coefficients of the product of linear terms `X + λ` where `λ` runs
through a multiset `s` : the `k`th coefficient is the symmetric function `esymm (card s - k) s`. -/
theorem prod_X_add_C_coeff (s : Multiset R) {k : ℕ} (h : k ≤ Multiset.card s) :
(s.map fun r => X + C r).prod.coeff k = s.esymm (Multiset.card s - k) := by
convert Polynomial.ext_iff.mp (prod_X_add_C_eq_sum_esymm s) k using 1
simp_rw [finset_sum_coeff, coeff_C_mul_X_pow]
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem (Multiset.card s - k) _]
· rw [if_pos (Nat.sub_sub_self h).symm]
· intro j hj1 hj2
suffices k ≠ card s - j by rw [if_neg this]
intro hn
rw [hn, Nat.sub_sub_self (Nat.lt_succ_iff.mp (Finset.mem_range.mp hj1))] at hj2
exact Ne.irrefl hj2
· rw [Finset.mem_range]
exact Nat.lt_succ_of_le (Nat.sub_le (Multiset.card s) k)
theorem prod_X_add_C_coeff' {σ} (s : Multiset σ) (r : σ → R) {k : ℕ} (h : k ≤ Multiset.card s) :
(s.map fun i => X + C (r i)).prod.coeff k = (s.map r).esymm (Multiset.card s - k) := by
rw [← Function.comp_def (f := fun r => X + C r) (g := r), ← map_map, prod_X_add_C_coeff]
<;> rw [s.card_map r]; assumption
theorem _root_.Finset.prod_X_add_C_coeff {σ} (s : Finset σ) (r : σ → R) {k : ℕ} (h : k ≤ #s) :
(∏ i ∈ s, (X + C (r i))).coeff k = ∑ t ∈ s.powersetCard (#s - k), ∏ i ∈ t, r i := by
rw [Finset.prod, prod_X_add_C_coeff' _ r h, Finset.esymm_map_val]
rfl
end Semiring
section Ring
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R]
theorem esymm_neg (s : Multiset R) (k : ℕ) : (map Neg.neg s).esymm k = (-1) ^ k * esymm s k := by
rw [esymm, esymm, ← Multiset.sum_map_mul_left, Multiset.powersetCard_map, Multiset.map_map,
map_congr rfl]
intro x hx
rw [(mem_powersetCard.mp hx).right.symm, ← prod_replicate, ← Multiset.map_const]
nth_rw 3 [← map_id' x]
rw [← prod_map_mul, map_congr rfl, Function.comp_apply]
exact fun z _ => neg_one_mul z
theorem prod_X_sub_X_eq_sum_esymm (s : Multiset R) :
(s.map fun t => X - C t).prod =
∑ j ∈ Finset.range (Multiset.card s + 1),
(-1) ^ j * (C (s.esymm j) * X ^ (Multiset.card s - j)) := by
conv_lhs =>
congr
congr
ext x
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
rw [← map_neg C x]
convert prod_X_add_C_eq_sum_esymm (map (fun t => -t) s) using 1
· rw [map_map]; rfl
· simp only [esymm_neg, card_map, mul_assoc, map_mul, map_pow, map_neg, map_one]
|
theorem prod_X_sub_C_coeff (s : Multiset R) {k : ℕ} (h : k ≤ Multiset.card s) :
(s.map fun t => X - C t).prod.coeff k =
(-1) ^ (Multiset.card s - k) * s.esymm (Multiset.card s - k) := by
conv_lhs =>
congr
congr
congr
ext x
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
rw [← map_neg C x]
convert prod_X_add_C_coeff (map (fun t => -t) s) _ using 1
· rw [map_map]; rfl
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Vieta.lean | 104 | 116 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Judith Ludwig, Christian Merten
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GeomSum
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.SModEq
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Jacobson.Ideal
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.PowTransition
/-!
# Completion of a module with respect to an ideal.
In this file we define the notions of Hausdorff, precomplete, and complete for an `R`-module `M`
with respect to an ideal `I`:
## Main definitions
- `IsHausdorff I M`: this says that the intersection of `I^n M` is `0`.
- `IsPrecomplete I M`: this says that every Cauchy sequence converges.
- `IsAdicComplete I M`: this says that `M` is Hausdorff and precomplete.
- `Hausdorffification I M`: this is the universal Hausdorff module with a map from `M`.
- `AdicCompletion I M`: if `I` is finitely generated, then this is the universal complete module
(TODO) with a map from `M`. This map is injective iff `M` is Hausdorff and surjective iff `M` is
precomplete.
-/
suppress_compilation
open Submodule
variable {R S T : Type*} [CommRing R] (I : Ideal R)
variable (M : Type*) [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable {N : Type*} [AddCommGroup N] [Module R N]
/-- A module `M` is Hausdorff with respect to an ideal `I` if `⋂ I^n M = 0`. -/
class IsHausdorff : Prop where
haus' : ∀ x : M, (∀ n : ℕ, x ≡ 0 [SMOD (I ^ n • ⊤ : Submodule R M)]) → x = 0
/-- A module `M` is precomplete with respect to an ideal `I` if every Cauchy sequence converges. -/
class IsPrecomplete : Prop where
prec' : ∀ f : ℕ → M, (∀ {m n}, m ≤ n → f m ≡ f n [SMOD (I ^ m • ⊤ : Submodule R M)]) →
∃ L : M, ∀ n, f n ≡ L [SMOD (I ^ n • ⊤ : Submodule R M)]
/-- A module `M` is `I`-adically complete if it is Hausdorff and precomplete. -/
class IsAdicComplete : Prop extends IsHausdorff I M, IsPrecomplete I M
variable {I M}
theorem IsHausdorff.haus (_ : IsHausdorff I M) :
∀ x : M, (∀ n : ℕ, x ≡ 0 [SMOD (I ^ n • ⊤ : Submodule R M)]) → x = 0 :=
IsHausdorff.haus'
theorem isHausdorff_iff :
IsHausdorff I M ↔ ∀ x : M, (∀ n : ℕ, x ≡ 0 [SMOD (I ^ n • ⊤ : Submodule R M)]) → x = 0 :=
⟨IsHausdorff.haus, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
theorem IsHausdorff.eq_iff_smodEq [IsHausdorff I M] {x y : M} :
x = y ↔ ∀ n, x ≡ y [SMOD (I ^ n • ⊤ : Submodule R M)] := by
refine ⟨fun h _ ↦ h ▸ rfl, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
apply IsHausdorff.haus' (I := I) (x - y)
simpa [SModEq.sub_mem] using h
theorem IsPrecomplete.prec (_ : IsPrecomplete I M) {f : ℕ → M} :
(∀ {m n}, m ≤ n → f m ≡ f n [SMOD (I ^ m • ⊤ : Submodule R M)]) →
∃ L : M, ∀ n, f n ≡ L [SMOD (I ^ n • ⊤ : Submodule R M)] :=
IsPrecomplete.prec' _
theorem isPrecomplete_iff :
IsPrecomplete I M ↔
∀ f : ℕ → M,
(∀ {m n}, m ≤ n → f m ≡ f n [SMOD (I ^ m • ⊤ : Submodule R M)]) →
∃ L : M, ∀ n, f n ≡ L [SMOD (I ^ n • ⊤ : Submodule R M)] :=
⟨fun h => h.1, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
variable (I M)
/-- The Hausdorffification of a module with respect to an ideal. -/
abbrev Hausdorffification : Type _ :=
M ⧸ (⨅ n : ℕ, I ^ n • ⊤ : Submodule R M)
/-- The canonical linear map `M ⧸ (I ^ n • ⊤) →ₗ[R] M ⧸ (I ^ m • ⊤)` for `m ≤ n` used
to define `AdicCompletion`. -/
abbrev AdicCompletion.transitionMap {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) := factorPow I M hmn
/-- The completion of a module with respect to an ideal.
This is Hausdorff but not necessarily complete: a classical sufficient condition for
completeness is that `M` be finitely generated [Stacks, 0G1Q]. -/
def AdicCompletion : Type _ :=
{ f : ∀ n : ℕ, M ⧸ (I ^ n • ⊤ : Submodule R M) //
∀ {m n} (hmn : m ≤ n), AdicCompletion.transitionMap I M hmn (f n) = f m }
namespace IsHausdorff
instance bot : IsHausdorff (⊥ : Ideal R) M :=
⟨fun x hx => by simpa only [pow_one ⊥, bot_smul, SModEq.bot] using hx 1⟩
variable {M} in
protected theorem subsingleton (h : IsHausdorff (⊤ : Ideal R) M) : Subsingleton M :=
⟨fun x y => eq_of_sub_eq_zero <| h.haus (x - y) fun n => by
rw [Ideal.top_pow, top_smul]
exact SModEq.top⟩
instance (priority := 100) of_subsingleton [Subsingleton M] : IsHausdorff I M :=
⟨fun _ _ => Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩
variable {I M}
theorem iInf_pow_smul (h : IsHausdorff I M) : (⨅ n : ℕ, I ^ n • ⊤ : Submodule R M) = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 fun x hx =>
(mem_bot _).2 <| h.haus x fun n => SModEq.zero.2 <| (mem_iInf fun n : ℕ => I ^ n • ⊤).1 hx n
end IsHausdorff
namespace Hausdorffification
/-- The canonical linear map to the Hausdorffification. -/
def of : M →ₗ[R] Hausdorffification I M :=
mkQ _
variable {I M}
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on {C : Hausdorffification I M → Prop} (x : Hausdorffification I M)
(ih : ∀ x, C (of I M x)) : C x :=
Quotient.inductionOn' x ih
variable (I M)
instance : IsHausdorff I (Hausdorffification I M) :=
⟨fun x => Quotient.inductionOn' x fun x hx =>
(Quotient.mk_eq_zero _).2 <| (mem_iInf _).2 fun n => by
have := comap_map_mkQ (⨅ n : ℕ, I ^ n • ⊤ : Submodule R M) (I ^ n • ⊤)
simp only [sup_of_le_right (iInf_le (fun n => (I ^ n • ⊤ : Submodule R M)) n)] at this
rw [← this, map_smul'', mem_comap, Submodule.map_top, range_mkQ, ← SModEq.zero]
exact hx n⟩
variable {M} [h : IsHausdorff I N]
/-- Universal property of Hausdorffification: any linear map to a Hausdorff module extends to a
unique map from the Hausdorffification. -/
def lift (f : M →ₗ[R] N) : Hausdorffification I M →ₗ[R] N :=
liftQ _ f <| map_le_iff_le_comap.1 <| h.iInf_pow_smul ▸ le_iInf fun n =>
le_trans (map_mono <| iInf_le _ n) <| by
rw [map_smul'']
exact smul_mono le_rfl le_top
theorem lift_of (f : M →ₗ[R] N) (x : M) : lift I f (of I M x) = f x :=
rfl
theorem lift_comp_of (f : M →ₗ[R] N) : (lift I f).comp (of I M) = f :=
LinearMap.ext fun _ => rfl
/-- Uniqueness of lift. -/
theorem lift_eq (f : M →ₗ[R] N) (g : Hausdorffification I M →ₗ[R] N) (hg : g.comp (of I M) = f) :
g = lift I f :=
LinearMap.ext fun x => induction_on x fun x => by rw [lift_of, ← hg, LinearMap.comp_apply]
end Hausdorffification
namespace IsPrecomplete
instance bot : IsPrecomplete (⊥ : Ideal R) M := by
refine ⟨fun f hf => ⟨f 1, fun n => ?_⟩⟩
rcases n with - | n
· rw [pow_zero, Ideal.one_eq_top, top_smul]
exact SModEq.top
specialize hf (Nat.le_add_left 1 n)
rw [pow_one, bot_smul, SModEq.bot] at hf; rw [hf]
instance top : IsPrecomplete (⊤ : Ideal R) M :=
⟨fun f _ =>
⟨0, fun n => by
rw [Ideal.top_pow, top_smul]
exact SModEq.top⟩⟩
instance (priority := 100) of_subsingleton [Subsingleton M] : IsPrecomplete I M :=
⟨fun f _ => ⟨0, fun n => by rw [Subsingleton.elim (f n) 0]⟩⟩
end IsPrecomplete
namespace AdicCompletion
/-- `AdicCompletion` is the submodule of compatible families in
`∀ n : ℕ, M ⧸ (I ^ n • ⊤)`. -/
def submodule : Submodule R (∀ n : ℕ, M ⧸ (I ^ n • ⊤ : Submodule R M)) where
carrier := { f | ∀ {m n} (hmn : m ≤ n), AdicCompletion.transitionMap I M hmn (f n) = f m }
zero_mem' hmn := by rw [Pi.zero_apply, Pi.zero_apply, LinearMap.map_zero]
add_mem' hf hg m n hmn := by
rw [Pi.add_apply, Pi.add_apply, LinearMap.map_add, hf hmn, hg hmn]
smul_mem' c f hf m n hmn := by rw [Pi.smul_apply, Pi.smul_apply, LinearMap.map_smul, hf hmn]
instance : Zero (AdicCompletion I M) where
zero := ⟨0, by simp⟩
instance : Add (AdicCompletion I M) where
add x y := ⟨x.val + y.val, by simp [x.property, y.property]⟩
instance : Neg (AdicCompletion I M) where
neg x := ⟨- x.val, by simp [x.property]⟩
instance : Sub (AdicCompletion I M) where
sub x y := ⟨x.val - y.val, by simp [x.property, y.property]⟩
instance instSMul [SMul S R] [SMul S M] [IsScalarTower S R M] : SMul S (AdicCompletion I M) where
smul r x := ⟨r • x.val, by simp [x.property]⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma val_zero : (0 : AdicCompletion I M).val = 0 := rfl
lemma val_zero_apply (n : ℕ) : (0 : AdicCompletion I M).val n = 0 := rfl
variable {I M}
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma val_add (f g : AdicCompletion I M) : (f + g).val = f.val + g.val := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma val_sub (f g : AdicCompletion I M) : (f - g).val = f.val - g.val := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma val_neg (f : AdicCompletion I M) : (-f).val = -f.val := rfl
lemma val_add_apply (f g : AdicCompletion I M) (n : ℕ) : (f + g).val n = f.val n + g.val n := rfl
lemma val_sub_apply (f g : AdicCompletion I M) (n : ℕ) : (f - g).val n = f.val n - g.val n := rfl
lemma val_neg_apply (f : AdicCompletion I M) (n : ℕ) : (-f).val n = -f.val n := rfl
/- No `simp` attribute, since it causes `simp` unification timeouts when considering
the `Module (AdicCompletion I R) (AdicCompletion I M)` instance (see `AdicCompletion/Algebra`). -/
@[norm_cast]
lemma val_smul [SMul S R] [SMul S M] [IsScalarTower S R M] (s : S) (f : AdicCompletion I M) :
(s • f).val = s • f.val := rfl
lemma val_smul_apply [SMul S R] [SMul S M] [IsScalarTower S R M] (s : S) (f : AdicCompletion I M)
(n : ℕ) : (s • f).val n = s • f.val n := rfl
@[ext]
lemma ext {x y : AdicCompletion I M} (h : ∀ n, x.val n = y.val n) : x = y := Subtype.eq <| funext h
variable (I M)
instance : AddCommGroup (AdicCompletion I M) :=
let f : AdicCompletion I M → ∀ n, M ⧸ (I ^ n • ⊤ : Submodule R M) := Subtype.val
Subtype.val_injective.addCommGroup f rfl val_add val_neg val_sub (fun _ _ ↦ val_smul ..)
(fun _ _ ↦ val_smul ..)
instance [Semiring S] [SMul S R] [Module S M] [IsScalarTower S R M] :
Module S (AdicCompletion I M) :=
let f : AdicCompletion I M →+ ∀ n, M ⧸ (I ^ n • ⊤ : Submodule R M) :=
{ toFun := Subtype.val, map_zero' := rfl, map_add' := fun _ _ ↦ rfl }
Subtype.val_injective.module S f val_smul
instance instIsScalarTower [SMul S T] [SMul S R] [SMul T R] [SMul S M] [SMul T M]
[IsScalarTower S R M] [IsScalarTower T R M] [IsScalarTower S T M] :
IsScalarTower S T (AdicCompletion I M) where
smul_assoc s t f := by ext; simp [val_smul]
instance instSMulCommClass [SMul S R] [SMul T R] [SMul S M] [SMul T M]
[IsScalarTower S R M] [IsScalarTower T R M] [SMulCommClass S T M] :
SMulCommClass S T (AdicCompletion I M) where
smul_comm s t f := by ext; simp [val_smul, smul_comm]
instance instIsCentralScalar [SMul S R] [SMul Sᵐᵒᵖ R] [SMul S M] [SMul Sᵐᵒᵖ M]
[IsScalarTower S R M] [IsScalarTower Sᵐᵒᵖ R M] [IsCentralScalar S M] :
IsCentralScalar S (AdicCompletion I M) where
op_smul_eq_smul s f := by ext; simp [val_smul, op_smul_eq_smul]
/-- The canonical inclusion from the completion to the product. -/
@[simps]
def incl : AdicCompletion I M →ₗ[R] (∀ n, M ⧸ (I ^ n • ⊤ : Submodule R M)) where
toFun x := x.val
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
variable {I M}
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma val_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → AdicCompletion I M) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i).val = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i).val := by
simp_rw [← funext (incl_apply _ _ _), map_sum]
lemma val_sum_apply {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → AdicCompletion I M) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i).val n = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i).val n := by simp
variable (I M)
/-- The canonical linear map to the completion. -/
def of : M →ₗ[R] AdicCompletion I M where
toFun x := ⟨fun n => mkQ (I ^ n • ⊤ : Submodule R M) x, fun _ => rfl⟩
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem of_apply (x : M) (n : ℕ) : (of I M x).1 n = mkQ (I ^ n • ⊤ : Submodule R M) x :=
rfl
/-- Linearly evaluating a sequence in the completion at a given input. -/
def eval (n : ℕ) : AdicCompletion I M →ₗ[R] M ⧸ (I ^ n • ⊤ : Submodule R M) where
toFun f := f.1 n
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_eval (n : ℕ) :
(eval I M n : AdicCompletion I M → M ⧸ (I ^ n • ⊤ : Submodule R M)) = fun f => f.1 n :=
rfl
theorem eval_apply (n : ℕ) (f : AdicCompletion I M) : eval I M n f = f.1 n :=
rfl
theorem eval_of (n : ℕ) (x : M) : eval I M n (of I M x) = mkQ (I ^ n • ⊤ : Submodule R M) x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem eval_comp_of (n : ℕ) : (eval I M n).comp (of I M) = mkQ _ :=
rfl
theorem eval_surjective (n : ℕ) : Function.Surjective (eval I M n) := fun x ↦
Quotient.inductionOn' x fun x ↦ ⟨of I M x, rfl⟩
| @[simp]
theorem range_eval (n : ℕ) : LinearMap.range (eval I M n) = ⊤ :=
LinearMap.range_eq_top.2 (eval_surjective I M n)
| Mathlib/RingTheory/AdicCompletion/Basic.lean | 318 | 321 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Derivative
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.SMul
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Roots
import Mathlib.RingTheory.EuclideanDomain
import Mathlib.RingTheory.UniqueFactorizationDomain.NormalizedFactors
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
This file starts looking like the ring theory of $R[X]$
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w y z
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {k : Type y} {A : Type z} {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R]
theorem rootMultiplicity_sub_one_le_derivative_rootMultiplicity_of_ne_zero
(p : R[X]) (t : R) (hnezero : derivative p ≠ 0) :
p.rootMultiplicity t - 1 ≤ p.derivative.rootMultiplicity t :=
(le_rootMultiplicity_iff hnezero).2 <|
pow_sub_one_dvd_derivative_of_pow_dvd (p.pow_rootMultiplicity_dvd t)
theorem derivative_rootMultiplicity_of_root_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors
{p : R[X]} {t : R} (hpt : Polynomial.IsRoot p t)
(hnzd : (p.rootMultiplicity t : R) ∈ nonZeroDivisors R) :
(derivative p).rootMultiplicity t = p.rootMultiplicity t - 1 := by
by_cases h : p = 0
· simp only [h, map_zero, rootMultiplicity_zero]
obtain ⟨g, hp, hndvd⟩ := p.exists_eq_pow_rootMultiplicity_mul_and_not_dvd h t
set m := p.rootMultiplicity t
have hm : m - 1 + 1 = m := Nat.sub_add_cancel <| (rootMultiplicity_pos h).2 hpt
have hndvd : ¬(X - C t) ^ m ∣ derivative p := by
rw [hp, derivative_mul, dvd_add_left (dvd_mul_right _ _),
derivative_X_sub_C_pow, ← hm, pow_succ, hm, mul_comm (C _), mul_assoc,
dvd_cancel_left_mem_nonZeroDivisors (monic_X_sub_C t |>.pow _ |>.mem_nonZeroDivisors)]
rw [dvd_iff_isRoot, IsRoot] at hndvd ⊢
rwa [eval_mul, eval_C, mul_left_mem_nonZeroDivisors_eq_zero_iff hnzd]
have hnezero : derivative p ≠ 0 := fun h ↦ hndvd (by rw [h]; exact dvd_zero _)
exact le_antisymm (by rwa [rootMultiplicity_le_iff hnezero, hm])
(rootMultiplicity_sub_one_le_derivative_rootMultiplicity_of_ne_zero _ t hnezero)
theorem isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_lt_rootMultiplicity {p : R[X]} {t : R} {n : ℕ}
(hn : n < p.rootMultiplicity t) : (derivative^[n] p).IsRoot t :=
dvd_iff_isRoot.mp <| (dvd_pow_self _ <| Nat.sub_ne_zero_of_lt hn).trans
(pow_sub_dvd_iterate_derivative_of_pow_dvd _ <| p.pow_rootMultiplicity_dvd t)
open Finset in
theorem eval_iterate_derivative_rootMultiplicity {p : R[X]} {t : R} :
(derivative^[p.rootMultiplicity t] p).eval t =
(p.rootMultiplicity t).factorial • (p /ₘ (X - C t) ^ p.rootMultiplicity t).eval t := by
set m := p.rootMultiplicity t with hm
conv_lhs => rw [← p.pow_mul_divByMonic_rootMultiplicity_eq t, ← hm]
rw [iterate_derivative_mul, eval_finset_sum, sum_eq_single_of_mem _ (mem_range.mpr m.succ_pos)]
· rw [m.choose_zero_right, one_smul, eval_mul, m.sub_zero, iterate_derivative_X_sub_pow_self,
eval_natCast, nsmul_eq_mul]; rfl
· intro b hb hb0
rw [iterate_derivative_X_sub_pow, eval_smul, eval_mul, eval_smul, eval_pow,
Nat.sub_sub_self (mem_range_succ_iff.mp hb), eval_sub, eval_X, eval_C, sub_self,
zero_pow hb0, smul_zero, zero_mul, smul_zero]
theorem lt_rootMultiplicity_of_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors
{p : R[X]} {t : R} {n : ℕ} (h : p ≠ 0)
(hroot : ∀ m ≤ n, (derivative^[m] p).IsRoot t)
(hnzd : (n.factorial : R) ∈ nonZeroDivisors R) :
n < p.rootMultiplicity t := by
by_contra! h'
replace hroot := hroot _ h'
simp only [IsRoot, eval_iterate_derivative_rootMultiplicity] at hroot
obtain ⟨q, hq⟩ := Nat.cast_dvd_cast (α := R) <| Nat.factorial_dvd_factorial h'
rw [hq, mul_mem_nonZeroDivisors] at hnzd
rw [nsmul_eq_mul, mul_left_mem_nonZeroDivisors_eq_zero_iff hnzd.1] at hroot
exact eval_divByMonic_pow_rootMultiplicity_ne_zero t h hroot
theorem lt_rootMultiplicity_of_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors'
{p : R[X]} {t : R} {n : ℕ} (h : p ≠ 0)
(hroot : ∀ m ≤ n, (derivative^[m] p).IsRoot t)
(hnzd : ∀ m ≤ n, m ≠ 0 → (m : R) ∈ nonZeroDivisors R) :
n < p.rootMultiplicity t := by
apply lt_rootMultiplicity_of_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors h hroot
clear hroot
induction n with
| zero =>
simp only [Nat.factorial_zero, Nat.cast_one]
exact Submonoid.one_mem _
| succ n ih =>
rw [Nat.factorial_succ, Nat.cast_mul, mul_mem_nonZeroDivisors]
exact ⟨hnzd _ le_rfl n.succ_ne_zero, ih fun m h ↦ hnzd m (h.trans n.le_succ)⟩
theorem lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors
{p : R[X]} {t : R} {n : ℕ} (h : p ≠ 0)
(hnzd : (n.factorial : R) ∈ nonZeroDivisors R) :
n < p.rootMultiplicity t ↔ ∀ m ≤ n, (derivative^[m] p).IsRoot t :=
⟨fun hn _ hm ↦ isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_lt_rootMultiplicity <| hm.trans_lt hn,
fun hr ↦ lt_rootMultiplicity_of_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors h hr hnzd⟩
theorem lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors'
{p : R[X]} {t : R} {n : ℕ} (h : p ≠ 0)
(hnzd : ∀ m ≤ n, m ≠ 0 → (m : R) ∈ nonZeroDivisors R) :
n < p.rootMultiplicity t ↔ ∀ m ≤ n, (derivative^[m] p).IsRoot t :=
⟨fun hn _ hm ↦ isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_lt_rootMultiplicity <| Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt hm hn,
fun hr ↦ lt_rootMultiplicity_of_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors' h hr hnzd⟩
theorem one_lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot_iterate_derivative
{p : R[X]} {t : R} (h : p ≠ 0) :
1 < p.rootMultiplicity t ↔ ∀ m ≤ 1, (derivative^[m] p).IsRoot t :=
lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors h
(by rw [Nat.factorial_one, Nat.cast_one]; exact Submonoid.one_mem _)
theorem one_lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot
{p : R[X]} {t : R} (h : p ≠ 0) :
1 < p.rootMultiplicity t ↔ p.IsRoot t ∧ (derivative p).IsRoot t := by
rw [one_lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot_iterate_derivative h]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h 0 (by norm_num), h 1 (by norm_num)⟩, fun ⟨h0, h1⟩ m hm ↦ ?_⟩
obtain (_|_|m) := m
exacts [h0, h1, by omega]
end CommRing
section IsDomain
variable [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
theorem one_lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot_gcd
[GCDMonoid R[X]] {p : R[X]} {t : R} (h : p ≠ 0) :
1 < p.rootMultiplicity t ↔ (gcd p (derivative p)).IsRoot t := by
simp_rw [one_lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot h, ← dvd_iff_isRoot, dvd_gcd_iff]
theorem derivative_rootMultiplicity_of_root [CharZero R] {p : R[X]} {t : R} (hpt : p.IsRoot t) :
p.derivative.rootMultiplicity t = p.rootMultiplicity t - 1 := by
by_cases h : p = 0
· rw [h, map_zero, rootMultiplicity_zero]
exact derivative_rootMultiplicity_of_root_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors hpt <|
mem_nonZeroDivisors_of_ne_zero <| Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 ((rootMultiplicity_pos h).2 hpt).ne'
theorem rootMultiplicity_sub_one_le_derivative_rootMultiplicity [CharZero R] (p : R[X]) (t : R) :
p.rootMultiplicity t - 1 ≤ p.derivative.rootMultiplicity t := by
by_cases h : p.IsRoot t
· exact (derivative_rootMultiplicity_of_root h).symm.le
· rw [rootMultiplicity_eq_zero h, zero_tsub]
exact zero_le _
theorem lt_rootMultiplicity_of_isRoot_iterate_derivative
[CharZero R] {p : R[X]} {t : R} {n : ℕ} (h : p ≠ 0)
(hroot : ∀ m ≤ n, (derivative^[m] p).IsRoot t) :
n < p.rootMultiplicity t :=
lt_rootMultiplicity_of_isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors h hroot <|
mem_nonZeroDivisors_of_ne_zero <| Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 <| Nat.factorial_ne_zero n
theorem lt_rootMultiplicity_iff_isRoot_iterate_derivative
[CharZero R] {p : R[X]} {t : R} {n : ℕ} (h : p ≠ 0) :
n < p.rootMultiplicity t ↔ ∀ m ≤ n, (derivative^[m] p).IsRoot t :=
⟨fun hn _ hm ↦ isRoot_iterate_derivative_of_lt_rootMultiplicity <| Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt hm hn,
fun hr ↦ lt_rootMultiplicity_of_isRoot_iterate_derivative h hr⟩
/-- A sufficient condition for the set of roots of a nonzero polynomial `f` to be a subset of the
set of roots of `g` is that `f` divides `f.derivative * g`. Over an algebraically closed field of
characteristic zero, this is also a necessary condition.
See `isRoot_of_isRoot_iff_dvd_derivative_mul` -/
theorem isRoot_of_isRoot_of_dvd_derivative_mul [CharZero R] {f g : R[X]} (hf0 : f ≠ 0)
(hfd : f ∣ f.derivative * g) {a : R} (haf : f.IsRoot a) : g.IsRoot a := by
rcases hfd with ⟨r, hr⟩
have hdf0 : derivative f ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! haf
rw [eq_C_of_derivative_eq_zero haf] at hf0 ⊢
exact not_isRoot_C _ _ <| C_ne_zero.mp hf0
by_contra hg
have hdfg0 : f.derivative * g ≠ 0 := mul_ne_zero hdf0 (by rintro rfl; simp at hg)
have hr' := congr_arg (rootMultiplicity a) hr
rw [rootMultiplicity_mul hdfg0, derivative_rootMultiplicity_of_root haf,
rootMultiplicity_eq_zero hg, add_zero, rootMultiplicity_mul (hr ▸ hdfg0), add_comm,
Nat.sub_eq_iff_eq_add (Nat.succ_le_iff.2 ((rootMultiplicity_pos hf0).2 haf))] at hr'
omega
section NormalizationMonoid
variable [NormalizationMonoid R]
instance instNormalizationMonoid : NormalizationMonoid R[X] where
normUnit p :=
⟨C ↑(normUnit p.leadingCoeff), C ↑(normUnit p.leadingCoeff)⁻¹, by
rw [← RingHom.map_mul, Units.mul_inv, C_1], by rw [← RingHom.map_mul, Units.inv_mul, C_1]⟩
normUnit_zero := Units.ext (by simp)
normUnit_mul hp0 hq0 :=
Units.ext
(by
dsimp
rw [Ne, ← leadingCoeff_eq_zero] at *
rw [leadingCoeff_mul, normUnit_mul hp0 hq0, Units.val_mul, C_mul])
normUnit_coe_units u :=
Units.ext
(by
dsimp
rw [← mul_one u⁻¹, Units.val_mul, Units.eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq]
rcases Polynomial.isUnit_iff.1 ⟨u, rfl⟩ with ⟨_, ⟨w, rfl⟩, h2⟩
rw [← h2, leadingCoeff_C, normUnit_coe_units, ← C_mul, Units.mul_inv, C_1]
rfl)
@[simp]
theorem coe_normUnit {p : R[X]} : (normUnit p : R[X]) = C ↑(normUnit p.leadingCoeff) := by
simp [normUnit]
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_normalize (p : R[X]) :
leadingCoeff (normalize p) = normalize (leadingCoeff p) := by simp [normalize_apply]
theorem Monic.normalize_eq_self {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) : normalize p = p := by
simp only [Polynomial.coe_normUnit, normalize_apply, hp.leadingCoeff, normUnit_one,
Units.val_one, Polynomial.C.map_one, mul_one]
theorem roots_normalize {p : R[X]} : (normalize p).roots = p.roots := by
rw [normalize_apply, mul_comm, coe_normUnit, roots_C_mul _ (normUnit (leadingCoeff p)).ne_zero]
theorem normUnit_X : normUnit (X : Polynomial R) = 1 := by
have := coe_normUnit (R := R) (p := X)
rwa [leadingCoeff_X, normUnit_one, Units.val_one, map_one, Units.val_eq_one] at this
theorem X_eq_normalize : (X : Polynomial R) = normalize X := by
simp only [normalize_apply, normUnit_X, Units.val_one, mul_one]
end NormalizationMonoid
end IsDomain
section DivisionRing
variable [DivisionRing R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem degree_pos_of_ne_zero_of_nonunit (hp0 : p ≠ 0) (hp : ¬IsUnit p) : 0 < degree p :=
lt_of_not_ge fun h => by
rw [eq_C_of_degree_le_zero h] at hp0 hp
exact hp (IsUnit.map C (IsUnit.mk0 (coeff p 0) (mt C_inj.2 (by simpa using hp0))))
@[simp]
protected theorem map_eq_zero [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] (f : R →+* S) : p.map f = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by
simp only [Polynomial.ext_iff]
congr!
simp [map_eq_zero, coeff_map, coeff_zero]
theorem map_ne_zero [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] {f : R →+* S} (hp : p ≠ 0) : p.map f ≠ 0 :=
mt (Polynomial.map_eq_zero f).1 hp
@[simp]
theorem degree_map [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] (p : R[X]) (f : R →+* S) :
degree (p.map f) = degree p :=
p.degree_map_eq_of_injective f.injective
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_map [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] (f : R →+* S) :
natDegree (p.map f) = natDegree p :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq (degree_map _ f)
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_map [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] (f : R →+* S) :
leadingCoeff (p.map f) = f (leadingCoeff p) := by
simp only [← coeff_natDegree, coeff_map f, natDegree_map]
theorem monic_map_iff [Semiring S] [Nontrivial S] {f : R →+* S} {p : R[X]} :
(p.map f).Monic ↔ p.Monic := by
rw [Monic, leadingCoeff_map, ← f.map_one, Function.Injective.eq_iff f.injective, Monic]
end DivisionRing
section Field
variable [Field R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem isUnit_iff_degree_eq_zero : IsUnit p ↔ degree p = 0 :=
⟨degree_eq_zero_of_isUnit, fun h =>
have : degree p ≤ 0 := by simp [*, le_refl]
have hc : coeff p 0 ≠ 0 := fun hc => by
rw [eq_C_of_degree_le_zero this, hc] at h; simp only [map_zero] at h; contradiction
isUnit_iff_dvd_one.2
⟨C (coeff p 0)⁻¹, by
conv in p => rw [eq_C_of_degree_le_zero this]
rw [← C_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ hc, C_1]⟩⟩
/-- Division of polynomials. See `Polynomial.divByMonic` for more details. -/
def div (p q : R[X]) :=
C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹ * (p /ₘ (q * C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹))
/-- Remainder of polynomial division. See `Polynomial.modByMonic` for more details. -/
def mod (p q : R[X]) :=
p %ₘ (q * C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹)
private theorem quotient_mul_add_remainder_eq_aux (p q : R[X]) : q * div p q + mod p q = p := by
by_cases h : q = 0
· simp only [h, zero_mul, mod, modByMonic_zero, zero_add]
· conv =>
rhs
rw [← modByMonic_add_div p (monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv h)]
rw [div, mod, add_comm, mul_assoc]
private theorem remainder_lt_aux (p : R[X]) (hq : q ≠ 0) : degree (mod p q) < degree q := by
rw [← degree_mul_leadingCoeff_inv q hq]
exact degree_modByMonic_lt p (monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv hq)
instance : Div R[X] :=
⟨div⟩
instance : Mod R[X] :=
⟨mod⟩
theorem div_def : p / q = C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹ * (p /ₘ (q * C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹)) :=
rfl
theorem mod_def : p % q = p %ₘ (q * C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹) := rfl
theorem modByMonic_eq_mod (p : R[X]) (hq : Monic q) : p %ₘ q = p % q :=
show p %ₘ q = p %ₘ (q * C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹) by
simp only [Monic.def.1 hq, inv_one, mul_one, C_1]
theorem divByMonic_eq_div (p : R[X]) (hq : Monic q) : p /ₘ q = p / q :=
show p /ₘ q = C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹ * (p /ₘ (q * C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹)) by
simp only [Monic.def.1 hq, inv_one, C_1, one_mul, mul_one]
theorem mod_X_sub_C_eq_C_eval (p : R[X]) (a : R) : p % (X - C a) = C (p.eval a) :=
modByMonic_eq_mod p (monic_X_sub_C a) ▸ modByMonic_X_sub_C_eq_C_eval _ _
theorem mul_div_eq_iff_isRoot : (X - C a) * (p / (X - C a)) = p ↔ IsRoot p a :=
divByMonic_eq_div p (monic_X_sub_C a) ▸ mul_divByMonic_eq_iff_isRoot
instance instEuclideanDomain : EuclideanDomain R[X] :=
{ Polynomial.commRing,
Polynomial.nontrivial with
quotient := (· / ·)
quotient_zero := by simp [div_def]
remainder := (· % ·)
r := _
r_wellFounded := degree_lt_wf
quotient_mul_add_remainder_eq := quotient_mul_add_remainder_eq_aux
remainder_lt := fun _ _ hq => remainder_lt_aux _ hq
mul_left_not_lt := fun _ _ hq => not_lt_of_ge (degree_le_mul_left _ hq) }
theorem mod_eq_self_iff (hq0 : q ≠ 0) : p % q = p ↔ degree p < degree q :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ EuclideanDomain.mod_lt _ hq0, fun h => by
classical
have : ¬degree (q * C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹) ≤ degree p :=
not_le_of_gt <| by rwa [degree_mul_leadingCoeff_inv q hq0]
rw [mod_def, modByMonic, dif_pos (monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv hq0)]
unfold divModByMonicAux
dsimp
simp only [this, false_and, if_false]⟩
theorem div_eq_zero_iff (hq0 : q ≠ 0) : p / q = 0 ↔ degree p < degree q :=
⟨fun h => by
have := EuclideanDomain.div_add_mod p q
rwa [h, mul_zero, zero_add, mod_eq_self_iff hq0] at this,
fun h => by
have hlt : degree p < degree (q * C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹) := by
rwa [degree_mul_leadingCoeff_inv q hq0]
have hm : Monic (q * C (leadingCoeff q)⁻¹) := monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv hq0
rw [div_def, (divByMonic_eq_zero_iff hm).2 hlt, mul_zero]⟩
theorem degree_add_div (hq0 : q ≠ 0) (hpq : degree q ≤ degree p) :
degree q + degree (p / q) = degree p := by
have : degree (p % q) < degree (q * (p / q)) :=
calc
degree (p % q) < degree q := EuclideanDomain.mod_lt _ hq0
_ ≤ _ := degree_le_mul_left _ (mt (div_eq_zero_iff hq0).1 (not_lt_of_ge hpq))
conv_rhs =>
rw [← EuclideanDomain.div_add_mod p q, degree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt this, degree_mul]
theorem degree_div_le (p q : R[X]) : degree (p / q) ≤ degree p := by
by_cases hq : q = 0
· simp [hq]
· rw [div_def, mul_comm, degree_mul_leadingCoeff_inv _ hq]; exact degree_divByMonic_le _ _
theorem degree_div_lt (hp : p ≠ 0) (hq : 0 < degree q) : degree (p / q) < degree p := by
have hq0 : q ≠ 0 := fun hq0 => by simp [hq0] at hq
rw [div_def, mul_comm, degree_mul_leadingCoeff_inv _ hq0]
exact degree_divByMonic_lt _ (monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv hq0) hp
(by rw [degree_mul_leadingCoeff_inv _ hq0]; exact hq)
theorem isUnit_map [Field k] (f : R →+* k) : IsUnit (p.map f) ↔ IsUnit p := by
simp_rw [isUnit_iff_degree_eq_zero, degree_map]
theorem map_div [Field k] (f : R →+* k) : (p / q).map f = p.map f / q.map f := by
if hq0 : q = 0 then simp [hq0]
else
rw [div_def, div_def, Polynomial.map_mul, map_divByMonic f (monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv hq0),
Polynomial.map_mul, map_C, leadingCoeff_map, map_inv₀]
theorem map_mod [Field k] (f : R →+* k) : (p % q).map f = p.map f % q.map f := by
by_cases hq0 : q = 0
· simp [hq0]
· rw [mod_def, mod_def, leadingCoeff_map f, ← map_inv₀ f, ← map_C f, ← Polynomial.map_mul f,
map_modByMonic f (monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv hq0)]
lemma natDegree_mod_lt [Field k] (p : k[X]) {q : k[X]} (hq : q.natDegree ≠ 0) :
(p % q).natDegree < q.natDegree := by
have hq' : q.leadingCoeff ≠ 0 := by
rw [leadingCoeff_ne_zero]
contrapose! hq
simp [hq]
rw [mod_def]
refine (natDegree_modByMonic_lt p ?_ ?_).trans_le ?_
· refine monic_mul_C_of_leadingCoeff_mul_eq_one ?_
rw [mul_inv_eq_one₀ hq']
· contrapose! hq
rw [← natDegree_mul_C_eq_of_mul_eq_one ((inv_mul_eq_one₀ hq').mpr rfl)]
simp [hq]
· exact natDegree_mul_C_le q q.leadingCoeff⁻¹
section
open EuclideanDomain
theorem gcd_map [Field k] [DecidableEq R] [DecidableEq k] (f : R →+* k) :
gcd (p.map f) (q.map f) = (gcd p q).map f :=
GCD.induction p q (fun x => by simp_rw [Polynomial.map_zero, EuclideanDomain.gcd_zero_left])
fun x y _ ih => by rw [gcd_val, ← map_mod, ih, ← gcd_val]
end
theorem eval₂_gcd_eq_zero [CommSemiring k] [DecidableEq R]
{ϕ : R →+* k} {f g : R[X]} {α : k} (hf : f.eval₂ ϕ α = 0)
(hg : g.eval₂ ϕ α = 0) : (EuclideanDomain.gcd f g).eval₂ ϕ α = 0 := by
rw [EuclideanDomain.gcd_eq_gcd_ab f g, Polynomial.eval₂_add, Polynomial.eval₂_mul,
Polynomial.eval₂_mul, hf, hg, zero_mul, zero_mul, zero_add]
theorem eval_gcd_eq_zero [DecidableEq R] {f g : R[X]} {α : R}
(hf : f.eval α = 0) (hg : g.eval α = 0) : (EuclideanDomain.gcd f g).eval α = 0 :=
eval₂_gcd_eq_zero hf hg
theorem root_left_of_root_gcd [CommSemiring k] [DecidableEq R] {ϕ : R →+* k} {f g : R[X]} {α : k}
(hα : (EuclideanDomain.gcd f g).eval₂ ϕ α = 0) : f.eval₂ ϕ α = 0 := by
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := EuclideanDomain.gcd_dvd_left f g
rw [hp, Polynomial.eval₂_mul, hα, zero_mul]
theorem root_right_of_root_gcd [CommSemiring k] [DecidableEq R] {ϕ : R →+* k} {f g : R[X]} {α : k}
(hα : (EuclideanDomain.gcd f g).eval₂ ϕ α = 0) : g.eval₂ ϕ α = 0 := by
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := EuclideanDomain.gcd_dvd_right f g
rw [hp, Polynomial.eval₂_mul, hα, zero_mul]
theorem root_gcd_iff_root_left_right [CommSemiring k] [DecidableEq R]
{ϕ : R →+* k} {f g : R[X]} {α : k} :
(EuclideanDomain.gcd f g).eval₂ ϕ α = 0 ↔ f.eval₂ ϕ α = 0 ∧ g.eval₂ ϕ α = 0 :=
⟨fun h => ⟨root_left_of_root_gcd h, root_right_of_root_gcd h⟩, fun h => eval₂_gcd_eq_zero h.1 h.2⟩
theorem isRoot_gcd_iff_isRoot_left_right [DecidableEq R] {f g : R[X]} {α : R} :
(EuclideanDomain.gcd f g).IsRoot α ↔ f.IsRoot α ∧ g.IsRoot α :=
root_gcd_iff_root_left_right
theorem isCoprime_map [Field k] (f : R →+* k) : IsCoprime (p.map f) (q.map f) ↔ IsCoprime p q := by
classical
rw [← EuclideanDomain.gcd_isUnit_iff, ← EuclideanDomain.gcd_isUnit_iff, gcd_map, isUnit_map]
theorem mem_roots_map [CommRing k] [IsDomain k] {f : R →+* k} {x : k} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
x ∈ (p.map f).roots ↔ p.eval₂ f x = 0 := by
rw [mem_roots (map_ne_zero hp), IsRoot, Polynomial.eval_map]
theorem rootSet_monomial [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra R S] {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) {a : R}
(ha : a ≠ 0) : (monomial n a).rootSet S = {0} := by
classical
rw [rootSet, aroots_monomial ha,
Multiset.toFinset_nsmul _ _ hn, Multiset.toFinset_singleton, Finset.coe_singleton]
theorem rootSet_C_mul_X_pow [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra R S] {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) {a : R}
(ha : a ≠ 0) : rootSet (C a * X ^ n) S = {0} := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, rootSet_monomial hn ha]
theorem rootSet_X_pow [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra R S] {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(X ^ n : R[X]).rootSet S = {0} := by
rw [← one_mul (X ^ n : R[X]), ← C_1, rootSet_C_mul_X_pow hn]
exact one_ne_zero
theorem rootSet_prod [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra R S] {ι : Type*} (f : ι → R[X])
(s : Finset ι) (h : s.prod f ≠ 0) : (s.prod f).rootSet S = ⋃ i ∈ s, (f i).rootSet S := by
classical
simp only [rootSet, aroots, ← Finset.mem_coe]
rw [Polynomial.map_prod, roots_prod, Finset.bind_toFinset, s.val_toFinset, Finset.coe_biUnion]
rwa [← Polynomial.map_prod, Ne, Polynomial.map_eq_zero]
theorem roots_C_mul_X_sub_C (b : R) (ha : a ≠ 0) : (C a * X - C b).roots = {a⁻¹ * b} := by
simp [roots_C_mul_X_sub_C_of_IsUnit b ⟨a, a⁻¹, mul_inv_cancel₀ ha, inv_mul_cancel₀ ha⟩]
theorem roots_C_mul_X_add_C (b : R) (ha : a ≠ 0) : (C a * X + C b).roots = {-(a⁻¹ * b)} := by
simp [roots_C_mul_X_add_C_of_IsUnit b ⟨a, a⁻¹, mul_inv_cancel₀ ha, inv_mul_cancel₀ ha⟩]
theorem roots_degree_eq_one (h : degree p = 1) : p.roots = {-((p.coeff 1)⁻¹ * p.coeff 0)} := by
rw [eq_X_add_C_of_degree_le_one (show degree p ≤ 1 by rw [h])]
have : p.coeff 1 ≠ 0 := coeff_ne_zero_of_eq_degree h
simp [roots_C_mul_X_add_C _ this]
theorem exists_root_of_degree_eq_one (h : degree p = 1) : ∃ x, IsRoot p x :=
⟨-((p.coeff 1)⁻¹ * p.coeff 0), by
rw [← mem_roots (by simp [← zero_le_degree_iff, h])]
simp [roots_degree_eq_one h]⟩
theorem coeff_inv_units (u : R[X]ˣ) (n : ℕ) : ((↑u : R[X]).coeff n)⁻¹ = (↑u⁻¹ : R[X]).coeff n := by
rw [eq_C_of_degree_eq_zero (degree_coe_units u), eq_C_of_degree_eq_zero (degree_coe_units u⁻¹),
coeff_C, coeff_C, inv_eq_one_div]
split_ifs
· rw [div_eq_iff_mul_eq (coeff_coe_units_zero_ne_zero u), coeff_zero_eq_eval_zero,
coeff_zero_eq_eval_zero, ← eval_mul, ← Units.val_mul, inv_mul_cancel]
simp
· simp
theorem monic_normalize [DecidableEq R] (hp0 : p ≠ 0) : Monic (normalize p) := by
rw [Ne, ← leadingCoeff_eq_zero, ← Ne, ← isUnit_iff_ne_zero] at hp0
rw [Monic, leadingCoeff_normalize, normalize_eq_one]
apply hp0
theorem leadingCoeff_div (hpq : q.degree ≤ p.degree) :
(p / q).leadingCoeff = p.leadingCoeff / q.leadingCoeff := by
by_cases hq : q = 0
· simp [hq]
rw [div_def, leadingCoeff_mul, leadingCoeff_C,
leadingCoeff_divByMonic_of_monic (monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv hq) _, mul_comm,
div_eq_mul_inv]
rwa [degree_mul_leadingCoeff_inv q hq]
theorem div_C_mul : p / (C a * q) = C a⁻¹ * (p / q) := by
by_cases ha : a = 0
· simp [ha]
simp only [div_def, leadingCoeff_mul, mul_inv, leadingCoeff_C, C.map_mul, mul_assoc]
congr 3
rw [mul_left_comm q, ← mul_assoc, ← C.map_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ ha, C.map_one, one_mul]
theorem C_mul_dvd (ha : a ≠ 0) : C a * p ∣ q ↔ p ∣ q :=
⟨fun h => dvd_trans (dvd_mul_left _ _) h, fun ⟨r, hr⟩ =>
⟨C a⁻¹ * r, by
rw [mul_assoc, mul_left_comm p, ← mul_assoc, ← C.map_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ ha, C.map_one,
one_mul, hr]⟩⟩
theorem dvd_C_mul (ha : a ≠ 0) : p ∣ Polynomial.C a * q ↔ p ∣ q :=
⟨fun ⟨r, hr⟩ =>
⟨C a⁻¹ * r, by
rw [mul_left_comm p, ← hr, ← mul_assoc, ← C.map_mul, inv_mul_cancel₀ ha, C.map_one,
one_mul]⟩,
fun h => dvd_trans h (dvd_mul_left _ _)⟩
theorem coe_normUnit_of_ne_zero [DecidableEq R] (hp : p ≠ 0) :
(normUnit p : R[X]) = C p.leadingCoeff⁻¹ := by
have : p.leadingCoeff ≠ 0 := mt leadingCoeff_eq_zero.mp hp
simp [CommGroupWithZero.coe_normUnit _ this]
theorem map_dvd_map' [Field k] (f : R →+* k) {x y : R[X]} : x.map f ∣ y.map f ↔ x ∣ y := by
by_cases H : x = 0
· rw [H, Polynomial.map_zero, zero_dvd_iff, zero_dvd_iff, Polynomial.map_eq_zero]
· classical
rw [← normalize_dvd_iff, ← @normalize_dvd_iff R[X], normalize_apply, normalize_apply,
coe_normUnit_of_ne_zero H, coe_normUnit_of_ne_zero (mt (Polynomial.map_eq_zero f).1 H),
leadingCoeff_map, ← map_inv₀ f, ← map_C, ← Polynomial.map_mul,
map_dvd_map _ f.injective (monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv H)]
@[simp]
theorem degree_normalize [DecidableEq R] : degree (normalize p) = degree p := by
simp [normalize_apply]
theorem prime_of_degree_eq_one (hp1 : degree p = 1) : Prime p := by
classical
have : Prime (normalize p) :=
Monic.prime_of_degree_eq_one (hp1 ▸ degree_normalize)
(monic_normalize fun hp0 => absurd hp1 (hp0.symm ▸ by simp [degree_zero]))
exact (normalize_associated _).prime this
theorem irreducible_of_degree_eq_one (hp1 : degree p = 1) : Irreducible p :=
(prime_of_degree_eq_one hp1).irreducible
theorem not_irreducible_C (x : R) : ¬Irreducible (C x) := by
by_cases H : x = 0
· rw [H, C_0]
exact not_irreducible_zero
· exact fun hx => hx.not_isUnit <| isUnit_C.2 <| isUnit_iff_ne_zero.2 H
theorem degree_pos_of_irreducible (hp : Irreducible p) : 0 < p.degree :=
lt_of_not_ge fun hp0 =>
have := eq_C_of_degree_le_zero hp0
not_irreducible_C (p.coeff 0) <| this ▸ hp
theorem X_sub_C_mul_divByMonic_eq_sub_modByMonic {K : Type*} [Ring K] (f : K[X]) (a : K) :
(X - C a) * (f /ₘ (X - C a)) = f - f %ₘ (X - C a) := by
rw [eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq', modByMonic_eq_sub_mul_div]
exact monic_X_sub_C a
theorem divByMonic_add_X_sub_C_mul_derivate_divByMonic_eq_derivative
{K : Type*} [CommRing K] (f : K[X]) (a : K) :
f /ₘ (X - C a) + (X - C a) * derivative (f /ₘ (X - C a)) = derivative f := by
have key := by apply congrArg derivative <| X_sub_C_mul_divByMonic_eq_sub_modByMonic f a
simpa only [derivative_mul, derivative_sub, derivative_X, derivative_C, sub_zero, one_mul,
modByMonic_X_sub_C_eq_C_eval] using key
theorem X_sub_C_dvd_derivative_of_X_sub_C_dvd_divByMonic {K : Type*} [Field K] (f : K[X]) {a : K}
(hf : (X - C a) ∣ f /ₘ (X - C a)) : X - C a ∣ derivative f := by
have key := divByMonic_add_X_sub_C_mul_derivate_divByMonic_eq_derivative f a
have ⟨u,hu⟩ := hf
rw [← key, hu, ← mul_add (X - C a) u _]
use (u + derivative ((X - C a) * u))
/-- If `f` is a polynomial over a field, and `a : K` satisfies `f' a ≠ 0`,
then `f / (X - a)` is coprime with `X - a`.
Note that we do not assume `f a = 0`, because `f / (X - a) = (f - f a) / (X - a)`. -/
theorem isCoprime_of_is_root_of_eval_derivative_ne_zero {K : Type*} [Field K] (f : K[X]) (a : K)
(hf' : f.derivative.eval a ≠ 0) : IsCoprime (X - C a : K[X]) (f /ₘ (X - C a)) := by
classical
refine Or.resolve_left
(EuclideanDomain.dvd_or_coprime (X - C a) (f /ₘ (X - C a))
(irreducible_of_degree_eq_one (Polynomial.degree_X_sub_C a))) ?_
contrapose! hf' with h
have : X - C a ∣ derivative f := X_sub_C_dvd_derivative_of_X_sub_C_dvd_divByMonic f h
| rw [← modByMonic_eq_zero_iff_dvd (monic_X_sub_C _), modByMonic_X_sub_C_eq_C_eval] at this
rwa [← C_inj, C_0]
/-- To check a polynomial over a field is irreducible, it suffices to check only for
divisors that have smaller degree.
See also: `Polynomial.Monic.irreducible_iff_natDegree`.
-/
theorem irreducible_iff_degree_lt (p : R[X]) (hp0 : p ≠ 0) (hpu : ¬ IsUnit p) :
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/FieldDivision.lean | 621 | 629 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Cauchy
/-!
# Uniform convergence
A sequence of functions `Fₙ` (with values in a metric space) converges uniformly on a set `s` to a
function `f` if, for all `ε > 0`, for all large enough `n`, one has for all `y ∈ s` the inequality
`dist (f y, Fₙ y) < ε`. Under uniform convergence, many properties of the `Fₙ` pass to the limit,
most notably continuity. We prove this in the file, defining the notion of uniform convergence
in the more general setting of uniform spaces, and with respect to an arbitrary indexing set
endowed with a filter (instead of just `ℕ` with `atTop`).
## Main results
Let `α` be a topological space, `β` a uniform space, `Fₙ` and `f` be functions from `α` to `β`
(where the index `n` belongs to an indexing type `ι` endowed with a filter `p`).
* `TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s`: the fact that `Fₙ` converges uniformly to `f` on `s`. This means
that, for any entourage `u` of the diagonal, for large enough `n` (with respect to `p`), one has
`(f y, Fₙ y) ∈ u` for all `y ∈ s`.
* `TendstoUniformly F f p`: same notion with `s = univ`.
* `TendstoUniformlyOn.continuousOn`: a uniform limit on a set of functions which are continuous
on this set is itself continuous on this set.
* `TendstoUniformly.continuous`: a uniform limit of continuous functions is continuous.
* `TendstoUniformlyOn.tendsto_comp`: If `Fₙ` tends uniformly to `f` on a set `s`, and `gₙ` tends
to `x` within `s`, then `Fₙ gₙ` tends to `f x` if `f` is continuous at `x` within `s`.
* `TendstoUniformly.tendsto_comp`: If `Fₙ` tends uniformly to `f`, and `gₙ` tends to `x`, then
`Fₙ gₙ` tends to `f x`.
Finally, we introduce the notion of a uniform Cauchy sequence, which is to uniform
convergence what a Cauchy sequence is to the usual notion of convergence.
## Implementation notes
We derive most of our initial results from an auxiliary definition `TendstoUniformlyOnFilter`.
This definition in and of itself can sometimes be useful, e.g., when studying the local behavior
of the `Fₙ` near a point, which would typically look like `TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p (𝓝 x)`.
Still, while this may be the "correct" definition (see
`tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter`), it is somewhat unwieldy to work with in
practice. Thus, we provide the more traditional definition in `TendstoUniformlyOn`.
## Tags
Uniform limit, uniform convergence, tends uniformly to
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology Uniformity Filter Set Uniform
variable {α β γ ι : Type*} [UniformSpace β]
variable {F : ι → α → β} {f : α → β} {s s' : Set α} {x : α} {p : Filter ι} {p' : Filter α}
/-!
### Different notions of uniform convergence
We define uniform convergence, on a set or in the whole space.
-/
/-- A sequence of functions `Fₙ` converges uniformly on a filter `p'` to a limiting function `f`
with respect to the filter `p` if, for any entourage of the diagonal `u`, one has
`p ×ˢ p'`-eventually `(f x, Fₙ x) ∈ u`. -/
def TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (F : ι → α → β) (f : α → β) (p : Filter ι) (p' : Filter α) :=
∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ n : ι × α in p ×ˢ p', (f n.snd, F n.fst n.snd) ∈ u
/--
A sequence of functions `Fₙ` converges uniformly on a filter `p'` to a limiting function `f` w.r.t.
filter `p` iff the function `(n, x) ↦ (f x, Fₙ x)` converges along `p ×ˢ p'` to the uniformity.
In other words: one knows nothing about the behavior of `x` in this limit besides it being in `p'`.
-/
theorem tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff_tendsto :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p' ↔
Tendsto (fun q : ι × α => (f q.2, F q.1 q.2)) (p ×ˢ p') (𝓤 β) :=
Iff.rfl
/-- A sequence of functions `Fₙ` converges uniformly on a set `s` to a limiting function `f` with
respect to the filter `p` if, for any entourage of the diagonal `u`, one has `p`-eventually
`(f x, Fₙ x) ∈ u` for all `x ∈ s`. -/
def TendstoUniformlyOn (F : ι → α → β) (f : α → β) (p : Filter ι) (s : Set α) :=
∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ x : α, x ∈ s → (f x, F n x) ∈ u
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s ↔ TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p (𝓟 s) := by
simp only [TendstoUniformlyOn, TendstoUniformlyOnFilter]
apply forall₂_congr
simp_rw [eventually_prod_principal_iff]
simp
alias ⟨TendstoUniformlyOn.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter, TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.tendstoUniformlyOn⟩ :=
tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter
/-- A sequence of functions `Fₙ` converges uniformly on a set `s` to a limiting function `f` w.r.t.
filter `p` iff the function `(n, x) ↦ (f x, Fₙ x)` converges along `p ×ˢ 𝓟 s` to the uniformity.
In other words: one knows nothing about the behavior of `x` in this limit besides it being in `s`.
-/
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendsto :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s ↔
Tendsto (fun q : ι × α => (f q.2, F q.1 q.2)) (p ×ˢ 𝓟 s) (𝓤 β) := by
simp [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter, tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff_tendsto]
/-- A sequence of functions `Fₙ` converges uniformly to a limiting function `f` with respect to a
filter `p` if, for any entourage of the diagonal `u`, one has `p`-eventually
`(f x, Fₙ x) ∈ u` for all `x`. -/
def TendstoUniformly (F : ι → α → β) (f : α → β) (p : Filter ι) :=
∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ x : α, (f x, F n x) ∈ u
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_univ : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p univ ↔ TendstoUniformly F f p := by
simp [TendstoUniformlyOn, TendstoUniformly]
theorem tendstoUniformly_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter :
TendstoUniformly F f p ↔ TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p ⊤ := by
rw [← tendstoUniformlyOn_univ, tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter, principal_univ]
theorem TendstoUniformly.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p ⊤ := by rwa [← tendstoUniformly_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter]
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformly_comp_coe :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s ↔ TendstoUniformly (fun i (x : s) => F i x) (f ∘ (↑)) p :=
forall₂_congr fun u _ => by simp
/-- A sequence of functions `Fₙ` converges uniformly to a limiting function `f` w.r.t.
filter `p` iff the function `(n, x) ↦ (f x, Fₙ x)` converges along `p ×ˢ ⊤` to the uniformity.
In other words: one knows nothing about the behavior of `x` in this limit.
-/
theorem tendstoUniformly_iff_tendsto :
TendstoUniformly F f p ↔ Tendsto (fun q : ι × α => (f q.2, F q.1 q.2)) (p ×ˢ ⊤) (𝓤 β) := by
simp [tendstoUniformly_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter, tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff_tendsto]
/-- Uniform convergence implies pointwise convergence. -/
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.tendsto_at (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p')
(hx : 𝓟 {x} ≤ p') : Tendsto (fun n => F n x) p <| 𝓝 (f x) := by
refine Uniform.tendsto_nhds_right.mpr fun u hu => mem_map.mpr ?_
filter_upwards [(h u hu).curry]
intro i h
simpa using h.filter_mono hx
/-- Uniform convergence implies pointwise convergence. -/
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.tendsto_at (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
Tendsto (fun n => F n x) p <| 𝓝 (f x) :=
h.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.tendsto_at
(le_principal_iff.mpr <| mem_principal.mpr <| singleton_subset_iff.mpr <| hx)
/-- Uniform convergence implies pointwise convergence. -/
theorem TendstoUniformly.tendsto_at (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) (x : α) :
Tendsto (fun n => F n x) p <| 𝓝 (f x) :=
h.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.tendsto_at le_top
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.mono_left {p'' : Filter ι} (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p')
(hp : p'' ≤ p) : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p'' p' := fun u hu =>
(h u hu).filter_mono (p'.prod_mono_left hp)
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.mono_right {p'' : Filter α} (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p')
(hp : p'' ≤ p') : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p'' := fun u hu =>
(h u hu).filter_mono (p.prod_mono_right hp)
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.mono (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s) (h' : s' ⊆ s) :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s' :=
tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.mpr
(h.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.mono_right (le_principal_iff.mpr <| mem_principal.mpr h'))
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.congr {F' : ι → α → β} (hf : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p')
(hff' : ∀ᶠ n : ι × α in p ×ˢ p', F n.fst n.snd = F' n.fst n.snd) :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F' f p p' := by
refine fun u hu => ((hf u hu).and hff').mono fun n h => ?_
rw [← h.right]
exact h.left
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.congr {F' : ι → α → β} (hf : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s)
(hff' : ∀ᶠ n in p, Set.EqOn (F n) (F' n) s) : TendstoUniformlyOn F' f p s := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter] at hf ⊢
refine hf.congr ?_
rw [eventually_iff] at hff' ⊢
simp only [Set.EqOn] at hff'
simp only [mem_prod_principal, hff', mem_setOf_eq]
lemma tendstoUniformly_congr {F' : ι → α → β} (hF : F =ᶠ[p] F') :
TendstoUniformly F f p ↔ TendstoUniformly F' f p := by
simp_rw [← tendstoUniformlyOn_univ] at *
have HF := EventuallyEq.exists_mem hF
exact ⟨fun h => h.congr (by aesop), fun h => h.congr (by simp_rw [eqOn_comm]; aesop)⟩
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.congr_right {g : α → β} (hf : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s)
(hfg : EqOn f g s) : TendstoUniformlyOn F g p s := fun u hu => by
filter_upwards [hf u hu] with i hi a ha using hfg ha ▸ hi a ha
protected theorem TendstoUniformly.tendstoUniformlyOn (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s :=
(tendstoUniformlyOn_univ.2 h).mono (subset_univ s)
/-- Composing on the right by a function preserves uniform convergence on a filter -/
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.comp (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p') (g : γ → α) :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (fun n => F n ∘ g) (f ∘ g) p (p'.comap g) := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff_tendsto] at h ⊢
exact h.comp (tendsto_id.prodMap tendsto_comap)
/-- Composing on the right by a function preserves uniform convergence on a set -/
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.comp (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s) (g : γ → α) :
TendstoUniformlyOn (fun n => F n ∘ g) (f ∘ g) p (g ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter] at h ⊢
simpa [TendstoUniformlyOn, comap_principal] using TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.comp h g
/-- Composing on the right by a function preserves uniform convergence -/
theorem TendstoUniformly.comp (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) (g : γ → α) :
TendstoUniformly (fun n => F n ∘ g) (f ∘ g) p := by
rw [tendstoUniformly_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter] at h ⊢
simpa [principal_univ, comap_principal] using h.comp g
/-- Composing on the left by a uniformly continuous function preserves
uniform convergence on a filter -/
theorem UniformContinuous.comp_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter [UniformSpace γ] {g : β → γ}
(hg : UniformContinuous g) (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p') :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (fun i => g ∘ F i) (g ∘ f) p p' := fun _u hu => h _ (hg hu)
/-- Composing on the left by a uniformly continuous function preserves
uniform convergence on a set -/
theorem UniformContinuous.comp_tendstoUniformlyOn [UniformSpace γ] {g : β → γ}
(hg : UniformContinuous g) (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s) :
TendstoUniformlyOn (fun i => g ∘ F i) (g ∘ f) p s := fun _u hu => h _ (hg hu)
/-- Composing on the left by a uniformly continuous function preserves uniform convergence -/
theorem UniformContinuous.comp_tendstoUniformly [UniformSpace γ] {g : β → γ}
(hg : UniformContinuous g) (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) :
TendstoUniformly (fun i => g ∘ F i) (g ∘ f) p := fun _u hu => h _ (hg hu)
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.prodMap {ι' α' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α' → β'}
{f' : α' → β'} {q : Filter ι'} {q' : Filter α'} (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p')
(h' : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F' f' q q') :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (fun i : ι × ι' => Prod.map (F i.1) (F' i.2)) (Prod.map f f') (p ×ˢ q)
(p' ×ˢ q') := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff_tendsto] at h h' ⊢
rw [uniformity_prod_eq_comap_prod, tendsto_comap_iff, ← map_swap4_prod, tendsto_map'_iff]
simpa using h.prodMap h'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.prod_map := TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.prodMap
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.prodMap {ι' α' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α' → β'}
{f' : α' → β'} {p' : Filter ι'} {s' : Set α'} (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s)
(h' : TendstoUniformlyOn F' f' p' s') :
TendstoUniformlyOn (fun i : ι × ι' => Prod.map (F i.1) (F' i.2)) (Prod.map f f') (p ×ˢ p')
(s ×ˢ s') := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter] at h h' ⊢
simpa only [prod_principal_principal] using h.prodMap h'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias TendstoUniformlyOn.prod_map := TendstoUniformlyOn.prodMap
theorem TendstoUniformly.prodMap {ι' α' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α' → β'}
{f' : α' → β'} {p' : Filter ι'} (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) (h' : TendstoUniformly F' f' p') :
TendstoUniformly (fun i : ι × ι' => Prod.map (F i.1) (F' i.2)) (Prod.map f f') (p ×ˢ p') := by
rw [← tendstoUniformlyOn_univ, ← univ_prod_univ] at *
exact h.prodMap h'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias TendstoUniformly.prod_map := TendstoUniformly.prodMap
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.prodMk {ι' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α → β'}
{f' : α → β'} {q : Filter ι'} (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p')
(h' : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F' f' q p') :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (fun (i : ι × ι') a => (F i.1 a, F' i.2 a)) (fun a => (f a, f' a))
(p ×ˢ q) p' :=
fun u hu => ((h.prodMap h') u hu).diag_of_prod_right
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.prod := TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.prodMk
protected theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.prodMk {ι' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α → β'}
{f' : α → β'} {p' : Filter ι'} (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s)
(h' : TendstoUniformlyOn F' f' p' s) :
TendstoUniformlyOn (fun (i : ι × ι') a => (F i.1 a, F' i.2 a)) (fun a => (f a, f' a)) (p ×ˢ p')
s :=
(congr_arg _ s.inter_self).mp ((h.prodMap h').comp fun a => (a, a))
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias TendstoUniformlyOn.prod := TendstoUniformlyOn.prodMk
theorem TendstoUniformly.prodMk {ι' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α → β'} {f' : α → β'}
{p' : Filter ι'} (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) (h' : TendstoUniformly F' f' p') :
TendstoUniformly (fun (i : ι × ι') a => (F i.1 a, F' i.2 a)) (fun a => (f a, f' a)) (p ×ˢ p') :=
(h.prodMap h').comp fun a => (a, a)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias TendstoUniformly.prod := TendstoUniformly.prodMk
/-- Uniform convergence on a filter `p'` to a constant function is equivalent to convergence in
`p ×ˢ p'`. -/
theorem tendsto_prod_filter_iff {c : β} :
Tendsto (↿F) (p ×ˢ p') (𝓝 c) ↔ TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F (fun _ => c) p p' := by
simp_rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, tendsto_comap_iff]
rfl
/-- Uniform convergence on a set `s` to a constant function is equivalent to convergence in
`p ×ˢ 𝓟 s`. -/
theorem tendsto_prod_principal_iff {c : β} :
Tendsto (↿F) (p ×ˢ 𝓟 s) (𝓝 c) ↔ TendstoUniformlyOn F (fun _ => c) p s := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter]
exact tendsto_prod_filter_iff
/-- Uniform convergence to a constant function is equivalent to convergence in `p ×ˢ ⊤`. -/
theorem tendsto_prod_top_iff {c : β} :
Tendsto (↿F) (p ×ˢ ⊤) (𝓝 c) ↔ TendstoUniformly F (fun _ => c) p := by
rw [tendstoUniformly_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter]
exact tendsto_prod_filter_iff
/-- Uniform convergence on the empty set is vacuously true -/
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_empty : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p ∅ := fun u _ => by simp
/-- Uniform convergence on a singleton is equivalent to regular convergence -/
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_singleton_iff_tendsto :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p {x} ↔ Tendsto (fun n : ι => F n x) p (𝓝 (f x)) := by
simp_rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendsto, Uniform.tendsto_nhds_right, tendsto_def]
exact forall₂_congr fun u _ => by simp [mem_prod_principal, preimage]
/-- If a sequence `g` converges to some `b`, then the sequence of constant functions
`fun n ↦ fun a ↦ g n` converges to the constant function `fun a ↦ b` on any set `s` -/
theorem Filter.Tendsto.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_const {g : ι → β} {b : β} (hg : Tendsto g p (𝓝 b))
(p' : Filter α) :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (fun n : ι => fun _ : α => g n) (fun _ : α => b) p p' := by
simpa only [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, tendsto_comap_iff] using hg.comp (tendsto_fst (g := p'))
/-- If a sequence `g` converges to some `b`, then the sequence of constant functions
`fun n ↦ fun a ↦ g n` converges to the constant function `fun a ↦ b` on any set `s` -/
theorem Filter.Tendsto.tendstoUniformlyOn_const {g : ι → β} {b : β} (hg : Tendsto g p (𝓝 b))
(s : Set α) : TendstoUniformlyOn (fun n : ι => fun _ : α => g n) (fun _ : α => b) p s :=
tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.mpr (hg.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_const (𝓟 s))
theorem UniformContinuousOn.tendstoUniformlyOn [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace γ] {U : Set α}
{V : Set β} {F : α → β → γ} (hF : UniformContinuousOn (↿F) (U ×ˢ V)) (hU : x ∈ U) :
TendstoUniformlyOn F (F x) (𝓝[U] x) V := by
set φ := fun q : α × β => ((x, q.2), q)
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendsto]
change Tendsto (Prod.map (↿F) ↿F ∘ φ) (𝓝[U] x ×ˢ 𝓟 V) (𝓤 γ)
simp only [nhdsWithin, Filter.prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, inf_assoc, comap_principal, inf_principal]
refine hF.comp (Tendsto.inf ?_ <| tendsto_principal_principal.2 fun x hx => ⟨⟨hU, hx.2⟩, hx⟩)
simp only [uniformity_prod_eq_comap_prod, tendsto_comap_iff, (· ∘ ·),
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, comap_comap]
exact tendsto_comap.prodMk (tendsto_diag_uniformity _ _)
theorem UniformContinuousOn.tendstoUniformly [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace γ] {U : Set α}
(hU : U ∈ 𝓝 x) {F : α → β → γ} (hF : UniformContinuousOn (↿F) (U ×ˢ (univ : Set β))) :
TendstoUniformly F (F x) (𝓝 x) := by
simpa only [tendstoUniformlyOn_univ, nhdsWithin_eq_nhds.2 hU]
using hF.tendstoUniformlyOn (mem_of_mem_nhds hU)
theorem UniformContinuous₂.tendstoUniformly [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace γ] {f : α → β → γ}
(h : UniformContinuous₂ f) : TendstoUniformly f (f x) (𝓝 x) :=
UniformContinuousOn.tendstoUniformly univ_mem <| by rwa [univ_prod_univ, uniformContinuousOn_univ]
/-- A sequence is uniformly Cauchy if eventually all of its pairwise differences are
uniformly bounded -/
def UniformCauchySeqOnFilter (F : ι → α → β) (p : Filter ι) (p' : Filter α) : Prop :=
∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ m : (ι × ι) × α in (p ×ˢ p) ×ˢ p', (F m.fst.fst m.snd, F m.fst.snd m.snd) ∈ u
/-- A sequence is uniformly Cauchy if eventually all of its pairwise differences are
uniformly bounded -/
def UniformCauchySeqOn (F : ι → α → β) (p : Filter ι) (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ m : ι × ι in p ×ˢ p, ∀ x : α, x ∈ s → (F m.fst x, F m.snd x) ∈ u
theorem uniformCauchySeqOn_iff_uniformCauchySeqOnFilter :
UniformCauchySeqOn F p s ↔ UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p (𝓟 s) := by
simp only [UniformCauchySeqOn, UniformCauchySeqOnFilter]
refine forall₂_congr fun u hu => ?_
rw [eventually_prod_principal_iff]
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.uniformCauchySeqOnFilter (hF : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s) :
UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p (𝓟 s) := by rwa [← uniformCauchySeqOn_iff_uniformCauchySeqOnFilter]
/-- A sequence that converges uniformly is also uniformly Cauchy -/
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.uniformCauchySeqOnFilter (hF : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p') :
UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p p' := by
intro u hu
rcases comp_symm_of_uniformity hu with ⟨t, ht, htsymm, htmem⟩
have := tendsto_swap4_prod.eventually ((hF t ht).prod_mk (hF t ht))
apply this.diag_of_prod_right.mono
simp only [and_imp, Prod.forall]
intro n1 n2 x hl hr
exact Set.mem_of_mem_of_subset (prodMk_mem_compRel (htsymm hl) hr) htmem
/-- A sequence that converges uniformly is also uniformly Cauchy -/
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.uniformCauchySeqOn (hF : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s) :
UniformCauchySeqOn F p s :=
uniformCauchySeqOn_iff_uniformCauchySeqOnFilter.mpr
hF.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.uniformCauchySeqOnFilter
/-- A uniformly Cauchy sequence converges uniformly to its limit -/
theorem UniformCauchySeqOnFilter.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_of_tendsto
(hF : UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p p')
(hF' : ∀ᶠ x : α in p', Tendsto (fun n => F n x) p (𝓝 (f x))) :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p' := by
rcases p.eq_or_neBot with rfl | _
· simp only [TendstoUniformlyOnFilter, bot_prod, eventually_bot, implies_true]
-- Proof idea: |f_n(x) - f(x)| ≤ |f_n(x) - f_m(x)| + |f_m(x) - f(x)|. We choose `n`
-- so that |f_n(x) - f_m(x)| is uniformly small across `s` whenever `m ≥ n`. Then for
-- a fixed `x`, we choose `m` sufficiently large such that |f_m(x) - f(x)| is small.
intro u hu
rcases comp_symm_of_uniformity hu with ⟨t, ht, htsymm, htmem⟩
-- We will choose n, x, and m simultaneously. n and x come from hF. m comes from hF'
-- But we need to promote hF' to the full product filter to use it
have hmc : ∀ᶠ x in (p ×ˢ p) ×ˢ p', Tendsto (fun n : ι => F n x.snd) p (𝓝 (f x.snd)) := by
rw [eventually_prod_iff]
exact ⟨fun _ => True, by simp, _, hF', by simp⟩
-- To apply filter operations we'll need to do some order manipulation
rw [Filter.eventually_swap_iff]
have := tendsto_prodAssoc.eventually (tendsto_prod_swap.eventually ((hF t ht).and hmc))
apply this.curry.mono
simp only [Equiv.prodAssoc_apply, eventually_and, eventually_const, Prod.snd_swap, Prod.fst_swap,
and_imp, Prod.forall]
-- Complete the proof
intro x n hx hm'
refine Set.mem_of_mem_of_subset (mem_compRel.mpr ?_) htmem
rw [Uniform.tendsto_nhds_right] at hm'
have := hx.and (hm' ht)
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := this.exists
exact ⟨F m x, ⟨hm.2, htsymm hm.1⟩⟩
/-- A uniformly Cauchy sequence converges uniformly to its limit -/
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.tendstoUniformlyOn_of_tendsto (hF : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s)
(hF' : ∀ x : α, x ∈ s → Tendsto (fun n => F n x) p (𝓝 (f x))) : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s :=
tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.mpr
(hF.uniformCauchySeqOnFilter.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_of_tendsto hF')
theorem UniformCauchySeqOnFilter.mono_left {p'' : Filter ι} (hf : UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p p')
(hp : p'' ≤ p) : UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p'' p' := by
intro u hu
have := (hf u hu).filter_mono (p'.prod_mono_left (Filter.prod_mono hp hp))
exact this.mono (by simp)
theorem UniformCauchySeqOnFilter.mono_right {p'' : Filter α} (hf : UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p p')
(hp : p'' ≤ p') : UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p p'' := fun u hu =>
have := (hf u hu).filter_mono ((p ×ˢ p).prod_mono_right hp)
this.mono (by simp)
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.mono (hf : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s) (hss' : s' ⊆ s) :
UniformCauchySeqOn F p s' := by
rw [uniformCauchySeqOn_iff_uniformCauchySeqOnFilter] at hf ⊢
exact hf.mono_right (le_principal_iff.mpr <| mem_principal.mpr hss')
/-- Composing on the right by a function preserves uniform Cauchy sequences -/
theorem UniformCauchySeqOnFilter.comp {γ : Type*} (hf : UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p p')
(g : γ → α) : UniformCauchySeqOnFilter (fun n => F n ∘ g) p (p'.comap g) := fun u hu => by
obtain ⟨pa, hpa, pb, hpb, hpapb⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.mp (hf u hu)
rw [eventually_prod_iff]
refine ⟨pa, hpa, pb ∘ g, ?_, fun hx _ hy => hpapb hx hy⟩
exact eventually_comap.mpr (hpb.mono fun x hx y hy => by simp only [hx, hy, Function.comp_apply])
/-- Composing on the right by a function preserves uniform Cauchy sequences -/
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.comp {γ : Type*} (hf : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s) (g : γ → α) :
UniformCauchySeqOn (fun n => F n ∘ g) p (g ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [uniformCauchySeqOn_iff_uniformCauchySeqOnFilter] at hf ⊢
simpa only [UniformCauchySeqOn, comap_principal] using hf.comp g
/-- Composing on the left by a uniformly continuous function preserves
uniform Cauchy sequences -/
theorem UniformContinuous.comp_uniformCauchySeqOn [UniformSpace γ] {g : β → γ}
(hg : UniformContinuous g) (hf : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s) :
UniformCauchySeqOn (fun n => g ∘ F n) p s := fun _u hu => hf _ (hg hu)
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.prodMap {ι' α' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α' → β'}
{p' : Filter ι'} {s' : Set α'} (h : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s)
(h' : UniformCauchySeqOn F' p' s') :
UniformCauchySeqOn (fun i : ι × ι' => Prod.map (F i.1) (F' i.2)) (p ×ˢ p') (s ×ˢ s') := by
intro u hu
rw [uniformity_prod_eq_prod, mem_map, mem_prod_iff] at hu
obtain ⟨v, hv, w, hw, hvw⟩ := hu
simp_rw [mem_prod, and_imp, Prod.forall, Prod.map_apply]
rw [← Set.image_subset_iff] at hvw
apply (tendsto_swap4_prod.eventually ((h v hv).prod_mk (h' w hw))).mono
intro x hx a b ha hb
exact hvw ⟨_, mk_mem_prod (hx.1 a ha) (hx.2 b hb), rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias UniformCauchySeqOn.prod_map := UniformCauchySeqOn.prodMap
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.prod {ι' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α → β'}
{p' : Filter ι'} (h : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s) (h' : UniformCauchySeqOn F' p' s) :
UniformCauchySeqOn (fun (i : ι × ι') a => (F i.fst a, F' i.snd a)) (p ×ˢ p') s :=
(congr_arg _ s.inter_self).mp ((h.prodMap h').comp fun a => (a, a))
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.prod' {β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι → α → β'}
(h : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s) (h' : UniformCauchySeqOn F' p s) :
UniformCauchySeqOn (fun (i : ι) a => (F i a, F' i a)) p s := fun u hu =>
have hh : Tendsto (fun x : ι => (x, x)) p (p ×ˢ p) := tendsto_diag
(hh.prodMap hh).eventually ((h.prod h') u hu)
/-- If a sequence of functions is uniformly Cauchy on a set, then the values at each point form
a Cauchy sequence. -/
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.cauchy_map [hp : NeBot p] (hf : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
Cauchy (map (fun i => F i x) p) := by
simp only [cauchy_map_iff, hp, true_and]
intro u hu
rw [mem_map]
filter_upwards [hf u hu] with p hp using hp x hx
/-- If a sequence of functions is uniformly Cauchy on a set, then the values at each point form
a Cauchy sequence. See `UniformCauchSeqOn.cauchy_map` for the non-`atTop` case. -/
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.cauchySeq [Nonempty ι] [SemilatticeSup ι]
(hf : UniformCauchySeqOn F atTop s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
CauchySeq fun i ↦ F i x :=
hf.cauchy_map (hp := atTop_neBot) hx
section SeqTendsto
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_of_seq_tendstoUniformlyOn {l : Filter ι} [l.IsCountablyGenerated]
(h : ∀ u : ℕ → ι, Tendsto u atTop l → TendstoUniformlyOn (fun n => F (u n)) f atTop s) :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f l s := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendsto, tendsto_iff_seq_tendsto]
intro u hu
rw [tendsto_prod_iff'] at hu
specialize h (fun n => (u n).fst) hu.1
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendsto] at h
exact h.comp (tendsto_id.prodMk hu.2)
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.seq_tendstoUniformlyOn {l : Filter ι} (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f l s)
(u : ℕ → ι) (hu : Tendsto u atTop l) : TendstoUniformlyOn (fun n => F (u n)) f atTop s := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendsto] at h ⊢
exact h.comp ((hu.comp tendsto_fst).prodMk tendsto_snd)
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_seq_tendstoUniformlyOn {l : Filter ι} [l.IsCountablyGenerated] :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f l s ↔
∀ u : ℕ → ι, Tendsto u atTop l → TendstoUniformlyOn (fun n => F (u n)) f atTop s :=
⟨TendstoUniformlyOn.seq_tendstoUniformlyOn, tendstoUniformlyOn_of_seq_tendstoUniformlyOn⟩
theorem tendstoUniformly_iff_seq_tendstoUniformly {l : Filter ι} [l.IsCountablyGenerated] :
TendstoUniformly F f l ↔
∀ u : ℕ → ι, Tendsto u atTop l → TendstoUniformly (fun n => F (u n)) f atTop := by
simp_rw [← tendstoUniformlyOn_univ]
exact tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_seq_tendstoUniformlyOn
end SeqTendsto
section
variable [NeBot p] {L : ι → β} {ℓ : β}
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.tendsto_of_eventually_tendsto
(h1 : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p') (h2 : ∀ᶠ i in p, Tendsto (F i) p' (𝓝 (L i)))
(h3 : Tendsto L p (𝓝 ℓ)) : Tendsto f p' (𝓝 ℓ) := by
rw [tendsto_nhds_left]
intro s hs
rw [mem_map, Set.preimage, ← eventually_iff]
obtain ⟨t, ht, hts⟩ := comp3_mem_uniformity hs
have p1 : ∀ᶠ i in p, (L i, ℓ) ∈ t := tendsto_nhds_left.mp h3 ht
have p2 : ∀ᶠ i in p, ∀ᶠ x in p', (F i x, L i) ∈ t := by
filter_upwards [h2] with i h2 using tendsto_nhds_left.mp h2 ht
have p3 : ∀ᶠ i in p, ∀ᶠ x in p', (f x, F i x) ∈ t := (h1 t ht).curry
obtain ⟨i, p4, p5, p6⟩ := (p1.and (p2.and p3)).exists
filter_upwards [p5, p6] with x p5 p6 using hts ⟨F i x, p6, L i, p5, p4⟩
theorem TendstoUniformly.tendsto_of_eventually_tendsto
(h1 : TendstoUniformly F f p) (h2 : ∀ᶠ i in p, Tendsto (F i) p' (𝓝 (L i)))
(h3 : Tendsto L p (𝓝 ℓ)) : Tendsto f p' (𝓝 ℓ) :=
(h1.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.mono_right le_top).tendsto_of_eventually_tendsto h2 h3
end
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/UniformConvergence.lean | 672 | 675 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Piecewise
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Ext
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.BinaryProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Biproducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Products
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
/-!
# Basic facts about biproducts in preadditive categories.
In (or between) preadditive categories,
* Any biproduct satisfies the equality
`total : ∑ j : J, biproduct.π f j ≫ biproduct.ι f j = 𝟙 (⨁ f)`,
or, in the binary case, `total : fst ≫ inl + snd ≫ inr = 𝟙 X`.
* Any (binary) `product` or (binary) `coproduct` is a (binary) `biproduct`.
* In any category (with zero morphisms), if `biprod.map f g` is an isomorphism,
then both `f` and `g` are isomorphisms.
* If `f` is a morphism `X₁ ⊞ X₂ ⟶ Y₁ ⊞ Y₂` whose `X₁ ⟶ Y₁` entry is an isomorphism,
then we can construct isomorphisms `L : X₁ ⊞ X₂ ≅ X₁ ⊞ X₂` and `R : Y₁ ⊞ Y₂ ≅ Y₁ ⊞ Y₂`
so that `L.hom ≫ g ≫ R.hom` is diagonal (with `X₁ ⟶ Y₁` component still `f`),
via Gaussian elimination.
* As a corollary of the previous two facts,
if we have an isomorphism `X₁ ⊞ X₂ ≅ Y₁ ⊞ Y₂` whose `X₁ ⟶ Y₁` entry is an isomorphism,
we can construct an isomorphism `X₂ ≅ Y₂`.
* If `f : W ⊞ X ⟶ Y ⊞ Z` is an isomorphism, either `𝟙 W = 0`,
or at least one of the component maps `W ⟶ Y` and `W ⟶ Z` is nonzero.
* If `f : ⨁ S ⟶ ⨁ T` is an isomorphism,
then every column (corresponding to a nonzero summand in the domain)
has some nonzero matrix entry.
* A functor preserves a biproduct if and only if it preserves
the corresponding product if and only if it preserves the corresponding coproduct.
There are connections between this material and the special case of the category whose morphisms are
matrices over a ring, in particular the Schur complement (see
`Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.SchurComplement`). In particular, the declarations
`CategoryTheory.Biprod.isoElim`, `CategoryTheory.Biprod.gaussian`
and `Matrix.invertibleOfFromBlocks₁₁Invertible` are all closely related.
-/
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Preadditive
open CategoryTheory.Limits
open CategoryTheory.Functor
open CategoryTheory.Preadditive
universe v v' u u'
noncomputable section
namespace CategoryTheory
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [Preadditive C]
namespace Limits
section Fintype
variable {J : Type} [Fintype J]
/-- In a preadditive category, we can construct a biproduct for `f : J → C` from
any bicone `b` for `f` satisfying `total : ∑ j : J, b.π j ≫ b.ι j = 𝟙 b.X`.
(That is, such a bicone is a limit cone and a colimit cocone.)
-/
def isBilimitOfTotal {f : J → C} (b : Bicone f) (total : ∑ j : J, b.π j ≫ b.ι j = 𝟙 b.pt) :
b.IsBilimit where
isLimit :=
{ lift := fun s => ∑ j : J, s.π.app ⟨j⟩ ≫ b.ι j
uniq := fun s m h => by
erw [← Category.comp_id m, ← total, comp_sum]
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
intro j _
have reassoced : m ≫ Bicone.π b j ≫ Bicone.ι b j = s.π.app ⟨j⟩ ≫ Bicone.ι b j := by
erw [← Category.assoc, eq_whisker (h ⟨j⟩)]
rw [reassoced]
fac := fun s j => by
classical
cases j
simp only [sum_comp, Category.assoc, Bicone.toCone_π_app, b.ι_π, comp_dite]
-- See note [dsimp, simp].
dsimp
simp }
isColimit :=
{ desc := fun s => ∑ j : J, b.π j ≫ s.ι.app ⟨j⟩
uniq := fun s m h => by
erw [← Category.id_comp m, ← total, sum_comp]
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
intro j _
erw [Category.assoc, h ⟨j⟩]
fac := fun s j => by
classical
cases j
simp only [comp_sum, ← Category.assoc, Bicone.toCocone_ι_app, b.ι_π, dite_comp]
dsimp; simp }
theorem IsBilimit.total {f : J → C} {b : Bicone f} (i : b.IsBilimit) :
∑ j : J, b.π j ≫ b.ι j = 𝟙 b.pt :=
i.isLimit.hom_ext fun j => by
classical
cases j
simp [sum_comp, b.ι_π, comp_dite]
/-- In a preadditive category, we can construct a biproduct for `f : J → C` from
any bicone `b` for `f` satisfying `total : ∑ j : J, b.π j ≫ b.ι j = 𝟙 b.X`.
(That is, such a bicone is a limit cone and a colimit cocone.)
-/
theorem hasBiproduct_of_total {f : J → C} (b : Bicone f)
(total : ∑ j : J, b.π j ≫ b.ι j = 𝟙 b.pt) : HasBiproduct f :=
HasBiproduct.mk
{ bicone := b
isBilimit := isBilimitOfTotal b total }
/-- In a preadditive category, any finite bicone which is a limit cone is in fact a bilimit
bicone. -/
def isBilimitOfIsLimit {f : J → C} (t : Bicone f) (ht : IsLimit t.toCone) : t.IsBilimit :=
isBilimitOfTotal _ <|
ht.hom_ext fun j => by
classical
cases j
simp [sum_comp, t.ι_π, dite_comp, comp_dite]
/-- We can turn any limit cone over a pair into a bilimit bicone. -/
def biconeIsBilimitOfLimitConeOfIsLimit {f : J → C} {t : Cone (Discrete.functor f)}
(ht : IsLimit t) : (Bicone.ofLimitCone ht).IsBilimit :=
isBilimitOfIsLimit _ <| IsLimit.ofIsoLimit ht <| Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp)
/-- In a preadditive category, any finite bicone which is a colimit cocone is in fact a bilimit
bicone. -/
def isBilimitOfIsColimit {f : J → C} (t : Bicone f) (ht : IsColimit t.toCocone) : t.IsBilimit :=
isBilimitOfTotal _ <|
ht.hom_ext fun j => by
classical
cases j
simp_rw [Bicone.toCocone_ι_app, comp_sum, ← Category.assoc, t.ι_π, dite_comp]
simp
/-- We can turn any limit cone over a pair into a bilimit bicone. -/
def biconeIsBilimitOfColimitCoconeOfIsColimit {f : J → C} {t : Cocone (Discrete.functor f)}
(ht : IsColimit t) : (Bicone.ofColimitCocone ht).IsBilimit :=
isBilimitOfIsColimit _ <| IsColimit.ofIsoColimit ht <| Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) <| by
rintro ⟨j⟩; simp
end Fintype
section Finite
variable {J : Type} [Finite J]
/-- In a preadditive category, if the product over `f : J → C` exists,
then the biproduct over `f` exists. -/
theorem HasBiproduct.of_hasProduct (f : J → C) [HasProduct f] : HasBiproduct f := by
cases nonempty_fintype J
exact HasBiproduct.mk
{ bicone := _
isBilimit := biconeIsBilimitOfLimitConeOfIsLimit (limit.isLimit _) }
/-- In a preadditive category, if the coproduct over `f : J → C` exists,
then the biproduct over `f` exists. -/
theorem HasBiproduct.of_hasCoproduct (f : J → C) [HasCoproduct f] : HasBiproduct f := by
cases nonempty_fintype J
exact HasBiproduct.mk
{ bicone := _
isBilimit := biconeIsBilimitOfColimitCoconeOfIsColimit (colimit.isColimit _) }
end Finite
/-- A preadditive category with finite products has finite biproducts. -/
theorem HasFiniteBiproducts.of_hasFiniteProducts [HasFiniteProducts C] : HasFiniteBiproducts C :=
⟨fun _ => { has_biproduct := fun _ => HasBiproduct.of_hasProduct _ }⟩
/-- A preadditive category with finite coproducts has finite biproducts. -/
theorem HasFiniteBiproducts.of_hasFiniteCoproducts [HasFiniteCoproducts C] :
HasFiniteBiproducts C :=
⟨fun _ => { has_biproduct := fun _ => HasBiproduct.of_hasCoproduct _ }⟩
section HasBiproduct
variable {J : Type} [Fintype J] {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f]
/-- In any preadditive category, any biproduct satisfies
`∑ j : J, biproduct.π f j ≫ biproduct.ι f j = 𝟙 (⨁ f)`
-/
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.total : ∑ j : J, biproduct.π f j ≫ biproduct.ι f j = 𝟙 (⨁ f) :=
IsBilimit.total (biproduct.isBilimit _)
theorem biproduct.lift_eq {T : C} {g : ∀ j, T ⟶ f j} :
biproduct.lift g = ∑ j, g j ≫ biproduct.ι f j := by
classical
ext j
simp only [sum_comp, biproduct.ι_π, comp_dite, biproduct.lift_π, Category.assoc, comp_zero,
Finset.sum_dite_eq', Finset.mem_univ, eqToHom_refl, Category.comp_id, if_true]
theorem biproduct.desc_eq {T : C} {g : ∀ j, f j ⟶ T} :
biproduct.desc g = ∑ j, biproduct.π f j ≫ g j := by
classical
ext j
simp [comp_sum, biproduct.ι_π_assoc, dite_comp]
@[reassoc]
theorem biproduct.lift_desc {T U : C} {g : ∀ j, T ⟶ f j} {h : ∀ j, f j ⟶ U} :
biproduct.lift g ≫ biproduct.desc h = ∑ j : J, g j ≫ h j := by
classical
simp [biproduct.lift_eq, biproduct.desc_eq, comp_sum, sum_comp, biproduct.ι_π_assoc, comp_dite,
dite_comp]
theorem biproduct.map_eq [HasFiniteBiproducts C] {f g : J → C} {h : ∀ j, f j ⟶ g j} :
biproduct.map h = ∑ j : J, biproduct.π f j ≫ h j ≫ biproduct.ι g j := by
classical
ext
simp [biproduct.ι_π, biproduct.ι_π_assoc, comp_sum, sum_comp, comp_dite, dite_comp]
@[reassoc]
theorem biproduct.lift_matrix {K : Type} [Finite K] [HasFiniteBiproducts C] {f : J → C} {g : K → C}
{P} (x : ∀ j, P ⟶ f j) (m : ∀ j k, f j ⟶ g k) :
biproduct.lift x ≫ biproduct.matrix m = biproduct.lift fun k => ∑ j, x j ≫ m j k := by
ext
simp [biproduct.lift_desc]
end HasBiproduct
section HasFiniteBiproducts
variable {J K : Type} [Finite J] {f : J → C} [HasFiniteBiproducts C]
@[reassoc]
theorem biproduct.matrix_desc [Fintype K] {f : J → C} {g : K → C}
(m : ∀ j k, f j ⟶ g k) {P} (x : ∀ k, g k ⟶ P) :
biproduct.matrix m ≫ biproduct.desc x = biproduct.desc fun j => ∑ k, m j k ≫ x k := by
ext
simp [lift_desc]
variable [Finite K]
@[reassoc]
theorem biproduct.matrix_map {f : J → C} {g : K → C} {h : K → C} (m : ∀ j k, f j ⟶ g k)
(n : ∀ k, g k ⟶ h k) :
biproduct.matrix m ≫ biproduct.map n = biproduct.matrix fun j k => m j k ≫ n k := by
ext
simp
@[reassoc]
theorem biproduct.map_matrix {f : J → C} {g : J → C} {h : K → C} (m : ∀ k, f k ⟶ g k)
(n : ∀ j k, g j ⟶ h k) :
biproduct.map m ≫ biproduct.matrix n = biproduct.matrix fun j k => m j ≫ n j k := by
ext
simp
end HasFiniteBiproducts
/-- Reindex a categorical biproduct via an equivalence of the index types. -/
@[simps]
def biproduct.reindex {β γ : Type} [Finite β] (ε : β ≃ γ)
(f : γ → C) [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct (f ∘ ε)] : ⨁ f ∘ ε ≅ ⨁ f where
hom := biproduct.desc fun b => biproduct.ι f (ε b)
inv := biproduct.lift fun b => biproduct.π f (ε b)
hom_inv_id := by
ext b b'
by_cases h : b' = b
· subst h; simp
· have : ε b' ≠ ε b := by simp [h]
simp [biproduct.ι_π_ne _ h, biproduct.ι_π_ne _ this]
inv_hom_id := by
classical
cases nonempty_fintype β
ext g g'
by_cases h : g' = g <;>
simp [Preadditive.sum_comp, Preadditive.comp_sum, biproduct.lift_desc,
biproduct.ι_π, biproduct.ι_π_assoc, comp_dite, Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply,
Finset.sum_dite_eq' Finset.univ (ε.symm g') _, h]
/-- In a preadditive category, we can construct a binary biproduct for `X Y : C` from
any binary bicone `b` satisfying `total : b.fst ≫ b.inl + b.snd ≫ b.inr = 𝟙 b.X`.
(That is, such a bicone is a limit cone and a colimit cocone.)
-/
def isBinaryBilimitOfTotal {X Y : C} (b : BinaryBicone X Y)
(total : b.fst ≫ b.inl + b.snd ≫ b.inr = 𝟙 b.pt) : b.IsBilimit where
isLimit :=
{ lift := fun s =>
(BinaryFan.fst s ≫ b.inl : s.pt ⟶ b.pt) + (BinaryFan.snd s ≫ b.inr : s.pt ⟶ b.pt)
uniq := fun s m h => by
have reassoced (j : WalkingPair) {W : C} (h' : _ ⟶ W) :
m ≫ b.toCone.π.app ⟨j⟩ ≫ h' = s.π.app ⟨j⟩ ≫ h' := by
rw [← Category.assoc, eq_whisker (h ⟨j⟩)]
erw [← Category.comp_id m, ← total, comp_add, reassoced WalkingPair.left,
reassoced WalkingPair.right]
fac := fun s j => by rcases j with ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> simp }
isColimit :=
{ desc := fun s =>
(b.fst ≫ BinaryCofan.inl s : b.pt ⟶ s.pt) + (b.snd ≫ BinaryCofan.inr s : b.pt ⟶ s.pt)
uniq := fun s m h => by
erw [← Category.id_comp m, ← total, add_comp, Category.assoc, Category.assoc,
h ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩, h ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩]
fac := fun s j => by rcases j with ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> simp }
theorem IsBilimit.binary_total {X Y : C} {b : BinaryBicone X Y} (i : b.IsBilimit) :
b.fst ≫ b.inl + b.snd ≫ b.inr = 𝟙 b.pt :=
i.isLimit.hom_ext fun j => by rcases j with ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> simp
/-- In a preadditive category, we can construct a binary biproduct for `X Y : C` from
any binary bicone `b` satisfying `total : b.fst ≫ b.inl + b.snd ≫ b.inr = 𝟙 b.X`.
(That is, such a bicone is a limit cone and a colimit cocone.)
-/
theorem hasBinaryBiproduct_of_total {X Y : C} (b : BinaryBicone X Y)
(total : b.fst ≫ b.inl + b.snd ≫ b.inr = 𝟙 b.pt) : HasBinaryBiproduct X Y :=
HasBinaryBiproduct.mk
{ bicone := b
isBilimit := isBinaryBilimitOfTotal b total }
/-- We can turn any limit cone over a pair into a bicone. -/
@[simps]
def BinaryBicone.ofLimitCone {X Y : C} {t : Cone (pair X Y)} (ht : IsLimit t) :
BinaryBicone X Y where
pt := t.pt
fst := t.π.app ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩
snd := t.π.app ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩
inl := ht.lift (BinaryFan.mk (𝟙 X) 0)
inr := ht.lift (BinaryFan.mk 0 (𝟙 Y))
theorem inl_of_isLimit {X Y : C} {t : BinaryBicone X Y} (ht : IsLimit t.toCone) :
t.inl = ht.lift (BinaryFan.mk (𝟙 X) 0) := by
apply ht.uniq (BinaryFan.mk (𝟙 X) 0); rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> dsimp <;> simp
theorem inr_of_isLimit {X Y : C} {t : BinaryBicone X Y} (ht : IsLimit t.toCone) :
t.inr = ht.lift (BinaryFan.mk 0 (𝟙 Y)) := by
apply ht.uniq (BinaryFan.mk 0 (𝟙 Y)); rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> dsimp <;> simp
/-- In a preadditive category, any binary bicone which is a limit cone is in fact a bilimit
bicone. -/
def isBinaryBilimitOfIsLimit {X Y : C} (t : BinaryBicone X Y) (ht : IsLimit t.toCone) :
t.IsBilimit :=
isBinaryBilimitOfTotal _ (by refine BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext ht ?_ ?_ <;> simp)
/-- We can turn any limit cone over a pair into a bilimit bicone. -/
def binaryBiconeIsBilimitOfLimitConeOfIsLimit {X Y : C} {t : Cone (pair X Y)} (ht : IsLimit t) :
(BinaryBicone.ofLimitCone ht).IsBilimit :=
isBinaryBilimitOfTotal _ <| BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext ht (by simp) (by simp)
/-- In a preadditive category, if the product of `X` and `Y` exists, then the
binary biproduct of `X` and `Y` exists. -/
theorem HasBinaryBiproduct.of_hasBinaryProduct (X Y : C) [HasBinaryProduct X Y] :
HasBinaryBiproduct X Y :=
HasBinaryBiproduct.mk
{ bicone := _
isBilimit := binaryBiconeIsBilimitOfLimitConeOfIsLimit (limit.isLimit _) }
/-- In a preadditive category, if all binary products exist, then all binary biproducts exist. -/
theorem HasBinaryBiproducts.of_hasBinaryProducts [HasBinaryProducts C] : HasBinaryBiproducts C :=
| { has_binary_biproduct := fun X Y => HasBinaryBiproduct.of_hasBinaryProduct X Y }
/-- We can turn any colimit cocone over a pair into a bicone. -/
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Preadditive/Biproducts.lean | 372 | 374 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Ken Lee, Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Units
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Nat.Units
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Divisibility.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Hom.Defs
import Mathlib.Logic.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
/-!
# Coprime elements of a ring or monoid
## Main definition
* `IsCoprime x y`: that `x` and `y` are coprime, defined to be the existence of `a` and `b` such
that `a * x + b * y = 1`. Note that elements with no common divisors (`IsRelPrime`) are not
necessarily coprime, e.g., the multivariate polynomials `x₁` and `x₂` are not coprime.
The two notions are equivalent in Bézout rings, see `isRelPrime_iff_isCoprime`.
This file also contains lemmas about `IsRelPrime` parallel to `IsCoprime`.
See also `RingTheory.Coprime.Lemmas` for further development of coprime elements.
-/
universe u v
section CommSemiring
variable {R : Type u} [CommSemiring R] (x y z : R)
/-- The proposition that `x` and `y` are coprime, defined to be the existence of `a` and `b` such
that `a * x + b * y = 1`. Note that elements with no common divisors are not necessarily coprime,
e.g., the multivariate polynomials `x₁` and `x₂` are not coprime. -/
def IsCoprime : Prop :=
∃ a b, a * x + b * y = 1
variable {x y z}
@[symm]
theorem IsCoprime.symm (H : IsCoprime x y) : IsCoprime y x :=
let ⟨a, b, H⟩ := H
⟨b, a, by rw [add_comm, H]⟩
theorem isCoprime_comm : IsCoprime x y ↔ IsCoprime y x :=
⟨IsCoprime.symm, IsCoprime.symm⟩
theorem isCoprime_self : IsCoprime x x ↔ IsUnit x :=
⟨fun ⟨a, b, h⟩ => isUnit_of_mul_eq_one x (a + b) <| by rwa [mul_comm, add_mul], fun h =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := isUnit_iff_exists_inv'.1 h
⟨b, 0, by rwa [zero_mul, add_zero]⟩⟩
theorem isCoprime_zero_left : IsCoprime 0 x ↔ IsUnit x :=
⟨fun ⟨a, b, H⟩ => isUnit_of_mul_eq_one x b <| by rwa [mul_zero, zero_add, mul_comm] at H, fun H =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := isUnit_iff_exists_inv'.1 H
⟨1, b, by rwa [one_mul, zero_add]⟩⟩
theorem isCoprime_zero_right : IsCoprime x 0 ↔ IsUnit x :=
isCoprime_comm.trans isCoprime_zero_left
theorem not_isCoprime_zero_zero [Nontrivial R] : ¬IsCoprime (0 : R) 0 :=
mt isCoprime_zero_right.mp not_isUnit_zero
lemma IsCoprime.intCast {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {a b : ℤ} (h : IsCoprime a b) :
IsCoprime (a : R) (b : R) := by
rcases h with ⟨u, v, H⟩
use u, v
rw_mod_cast [H]
exact Int.cast_one
/-- If a 2-vector `p` satisfies `IsCoprime (p 0) (p 1)`, then `p ≠ 0`. -/
theorem IsCoprime.ne_zero [Nontrivial R] {p : Fin 2 → R} (h : IsCoprime (p 0) (p 1)) : p ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
exact not_isCoprime_zero_zero h
theorem IsCoprime.ne_zero_or_ne_zero [Nontrivial R] (h : IsCoprime x y) : x ≠ 0 ∨ y ≠ 0 := by
apply not_or_of_imp
rintro rfl rfl
exact not_isCoprime_zero_zero h
theorem isCoprime_one_left : IsCoprime 1 x :=
⟨1, 0, by rw [one_mul, zero_mul, add_zero]⟩
theorem isCoprime_one_right : IsCoprime x 1 :=
⟨0, 1, by rw [one_mul, zero_mul, zero_add]⟩
theorem IsCoprime.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right (H1 : IsCoprime x z) (H2 : x ∣ y * z) : x ∣ y := by
let ⟨a, b, H⟩ := H1
rw [← mul_one y, ← H, mul_add, ← mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]
exact dvd_add (dvd_mul_left _ _) (H2.mul_left _)
theorem IsCoprime.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left (H1 : IsCoprime x y) (H2 : x ∣ y * z) : x ∣ z := by
let ⟨a, b, H⟩ := H1
rw [← one_mul z, ← H, add_mul, mul_right_comm, mul_assoc b]
exact dvd_add (dvd_mul_left _ _) (H2.mul_left _)
theorem IsCoprime.mul_left (H1 : IsCoprime x z) (H2 : IsCoprime y z) : IsCoprime (x * y) z :=
let ⟨a, b, h1⟩ := H1
let ⟨c, d, h2⟩ := H2
⟨a * c, a * x * d + b * c * y + b * d * z,
calc a * c * (x * y) + (a * x * d + b * c * y + b * d * z) * z
_ = (a * x + b * z) * (c * y + d * z) := by ring
_ = 1 := by rw [h1, h2, mul_one]
⟩
theorem IsCoprime.mul_right (H1 : IsCoprime x y) (H2 : IsCoprime x z) : IsCoprime x (y * z) := by
rw [isCoprime_comm] at H1 H2 ⊢
exact H1.mul_left H2
theorem IsCoprime.mul_dvd (H : IsCoprime x y) (H1 : x ∣ z) (H2 : y ∣ z) : x * y ∣ z := by
obtain ⟨a, b, h⟩ := H
rw [← mul_one z, ← h, mul_add]
apply dvd_add
· rw [mul_comm z, mul_assoc]
exact (mul_dvd_mul_left _ H2).mul_left _
· rw [mul_comm b, ← mul_assoc]
exact (mul_dvd_mul_right H1 _).mul_right _
theorem IsCoprime.of_mul_left_left (H : IsCoprime (x * y) z) : IsCoprime x z :=
let ⟨a, b, h⟩ := H
⟨a * y, b, by rwa [mul_right_comm, mul_assoc]⟩
theorem IsCoprime.of_mul_left_right (H : IsCoprime (x * y) z) : IsCoprime y z := by
rw [mul_comm] at H
exact H.of_mul_left_left
theorem IsCoprime.of_mul_right_left (H : IsCoprime x (y * z)) : IsCoprime x y := by
rw [isCoprime_comm] at H ⊢
exact H.of_mul_left_left
theorem IsCoprime.of_mul_right_right (H : IsCoprime x (y * z)) : IsCoprime x z := by
rw [mul_comm] at H
exact H.of_mul_right_left
theorem IsCoprime.mul_left_iff : IsCoprime (x * y) z ↔ IsCoprime x z ∧ IsCoprime y z :=
⟨fun H => ⟨H.of_mul_left_left, H.of_mul_left_right⟩, fun ⟨H1, H2⟩ => H1.mul_left H2⟩
theorem IsCoprime.mul_right_iff : IsCoprime x (y * z) ↔ IsCoprime x y ∧ IsCoprime x z := by
rw [isCoprime_comm, IsCoprime.mul_left_iff, isCoprime_comm, @isCoprime_comm _ _ z]
theorem IsCoprime.of_isCoprime_of_dvd_left (h : IsCoprime y z) (hdvd : x ∣ y) : IsCoprime x z := by
obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := hdvd
exact IsCoprime.of_mul_left_left h
theorem IsCoprime.of_isCoprime_of_dvd_right (h : IsCoprime z y) (hdvd : x ∣ y) : IsCoprime z x :=
(h.symm.of_isCoprime_of_dvd_left hdvd).symm
theorem IsCoprime.isUnit_of_dvd (H : IsCoprime x y) (d : x ∣ y) : IsUnit x :=
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := d
isCoprime_self.1 <| IsCoprime.of_mul_right_left <| show IsCoprime x (x * k) from hk ▸ H
theorem IsCoprime.isUnit_of_dvd' {a b x : R} (h : IsCoprime a b) (ha : x ∣ a) (hb : x ∣ b) :
IsUnit x :=
(h.of_isCoprime_of_dvd_left ha).isUnit_of_dvd hb
theorem IsCoprime.isRelPrime {a b : R} (h : IsCoprime a b) : IsRelPrime a b :=
fun _ ↦ h.isUnit_of_dvd'
theorem IsCoprime.map (H : IsCoprime x y) {S : Type v} [CommSemiring S] (f : R →+* S) :
IsCoprime (f x) (f y) :=
let ⟨a, b, h⟩ := H
⟨f a, f b, by rw [← f.map_mul, ← f.map_mul, ← f.map_add, h, f.map_one]⟩
theorem IsCoprime.of_add_mul_left_left (h : IsCoprime (x + y * z) y) : IsCoprime x y :=
let ⟨a, b, H⟩ := h
⟨a, a * z + b, by
simpa only [add_mul, mul_add, add_assoc, add_comm, add_left_comm, mul_assoc, mul_comm,
mul_left_comm] using H⟩
theorem IsCoprime.of_add_mul_right_left (h : IsCoprime (x + z * y) y) : IsCoprime x y := by
rw [mul_comm] at h
exact h.of_add_mul_left_left
theorem IsCoprime.of_add_mul_left_right (h : IsCoprime x (y + x * z)) : IsCoprime x y := by
rw [isCoprime_comm] at h ⊢
exact h.of_add_mul_left_left
theorem IsCoprime.of_add_mul_right_right (h : IsCoprime x (y + z * x)) : IsCoprime x y := by
rw [mul_comm] at h
exact h.of_add_mul_left_right
theorem IsCoprime.of_mul_add_left_left (h : IsCoprime (y * z + x) y) : IsCoprime x y := by
rw [add_comm] at h
exact h.of_add_mul_left_left
theorem IsCoprime.of_mul_add_right_left (h : IsCoprime (z * y + x) y) : IsCoprime x y := by
rw [add_comm] at h
exact h.of_add_mul_right_left
theorem IsCoprime.of_mul_add_left_right (h : IsCoprime x (x * z + y)) : IsCoprime x y := by
rw [add_comm] at h
exact h.of_add_mul_left_right
theorem IsCoprime.of_mul_add_right_right (h : IsCoprime x (z * x + y)) : IsCoprime x y := by
rw [add_comm] at h
exact h.of_add_mul_right_right
theorem IsRelPrime.of_add_mul_left_left (h : IsRelPrime (x + y * z) y) : IsRelPrime x y :=
fun _ hx hy ↦ h (dvd_add hx <| dvd_mul_of_dvd_left hy z) hy
theorem IsRelPrime.of_add_mul_right_left (h : IsRelPrime (x + z * y) y) : IsRelPrime x y :=
(mul_comm z y ▸ h).of_add_mul_left_left
theorem IsRelPrime.of_add_mul_left_right (h : IsRelPrime x (y + x * z)) : IsRelPrime x y := by
rw [isRelPrime_comm] at h ⊢
exact h.of_add_mul_left_left
theorem IsRelPrime.of_add_mul_right_right (h : IsRelPrime x (y + z * x)) : IsRelPrime x y :=
(mul_comm z x ▸ h).of_add_mul_left_right
theorem IsRelPrime.of_mul_add_left_left (h : IsRelPrime (y * z + x) y) : IsRelPrime x y :=
(add_comm _ x ▸ h).of_add_mul_left_left
theorem IsRelPrime.of_mul_add_right_left (h : IsRelPrime (z * y + x) y) : IsRelPrime x y :=
(add_comm _ x ▸ h).of_add_mul_right_left
theorem IsRelPrime.of_mul_add_left_right (h : IsRelPrime x (x * z + y)) : IsRelPrime x y :=
(add_comm _ y ▸ h).of_add_mul_left_right
theorem IsRelPrime.of_mul_add_right_right (h : IsRelPrime x (z * x + y)) : IsRelPrime x y :=
(add_comm _ y ▸ h).of_add_mul_right_right
end CommSemiring
section ScalarTower
variable {R G : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Group G] [MulAction G R] [SMulCommClass G R R]
[IsScalarTower G R R] (x : G) (y z : R)
theorem isCoprime_group_smul_left : IsCoprime (x • y) z ↔ IsCoprime y z :=
⟨fun ⟨a, b, h⟩ => ⟨x • a, b, by rwa [smul_mul_assoc, ← mul_smul_comm]⟩, fun ⟨a, b, h⟩ =>
⟨x⁻¹ • a, b, by rwa [smul_mul_smul_comm, inv_mul_cancel, one_smul]⟩⟩
theorem isCoprime_group_smul_right : IsCoprime y (x • z) ↔ IsCoprime y z :=
isCoprime_comm.trans <| (isCoprime_group_smul_left x z y).trans isCoprime_comm
theorem isCoprime_group_smul : IsCoprime (x • y) (x • z) ↔ IsCoprime y z :=
(isCoprime_group_smul_left x y (x • z)).trans (isCoprime_group_smul_right x y z)
end ScalarTower
section CommSemiringUnit
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] {x u v : R}
theorem isCoprime_mul_unit_left_left (hu : IsUnit x) (y z : R) :
IsCoprime (x * y) z ↔ IsCoprime y z :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := hu
hu ▸ isCoprime_group_smul_left u y z
theorem isCoprime_mul_unit_left_right (hu : IsUnit x) (y z : R) :
IsCoprime y (x * z) ↔ IsCoprime y z :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := hu
hu ▸ isCoprime_group_smul_right u y z
theorem isCoprime_mul_unit_right_left (hu : IsUnit x) (y z : R) :
IsCoprime (y * x) z ↔ IsCoprime y z :=
mul_comm x y ▸ isCoprime_mul_unit_left_left hu y z
theorem isCoprime_mul_unit_right_right (hu : IsUnit x) (y z : R) :
IsCoprime y (z * x) ↔ IsCoprime y z :=
mul_comm x z ▸ isCoprime_mul_unit_left_right hu y z
theorem isCoprime_mul_units_left (hu : IsUnit u) (hv : IsUnit v) (y z : R) :
IsCoprime (u * y) (v * z) ↔ IsCoprime y z :=
Iff.trans
(isCoprime_mul_unit_left_left hu _ _)
(isCoprime_mul_unit_left_right hv _ _)
theorem isCoprime_mul_units_right (hu : IsUnit u) (hv : IsUnit v) (y z : R) :
IsCoprime (y * u) (z * v) ↔ IsCoprime y z :=
Iff.trans
(isCoprime_mul_unit_right_left hu _ _)
(isCoprime_mul_unit_right_right hv _ _)
theorem isCoprime_mul_unit_left (hu : IsUnit x) (y z : R) :
IsCoprime (x * y) (x * z) ↔ IsCoprime y z :=
isCoprime_mul_units_left hu hu _ _
theorem isCoprime_mul_unit_right (hu : IsUnit x) (y z : R) :
IsCoprime (y * x) (z * x) ↔ IsCoprime y z :=
isCoprime_mul_units_right hu hu _ _
end CommSemiringUnit
namespace IsCoprime
section CommRing
variable {R : Type u} [CommRing R]
theorem add_mul_left_left {x y : R} (h : IsCoprime x y) (z : R) : IsCoprime (x + y * z) y :=
@of_add_mul_left_left R _ _ _ (-z) <| by simpa only [mul_neg, add_neg_cancel_right] using h
theorem add_mul_right_left {x y : R} (h : IsCoprime x y) (z : R) : IsCoprime (x + z * y) y := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact h.add_mul_left_left z
theorem add_mul_left_right {x y : R} (h : IsCoprime x y) (z : R) : IsCoprime x (y + x * z) := by
rw [isCoprime_comm]
exact h.symm.add_mul_left_left z
theorem add_mul_right_right {x y : R} (h : IsCoprime x y) (z : R) : IsCoprime x (y + z * x) := by
rw [isCoprime_comm]
exact h.symm.add_mul_right_left z
theorem mul_add_left_left {x y : R} (h : IsCoprime x y) (z : R) : IsCoprime (y * z + x) y := by
rw [add_comm]
exact h.add_mul_left_left z
theorem mul_add_right_left {x y : R} (h : IsCoprime x y) (z : R) : IsCoprime (z * y + x) y := by
rw [add_comm]
exact h.add_mul_right_left z
theorem mul_add_left_right {x y : R} (h : IsCoprime x y) (z : R) : IsCoprime x (x * z + y) := by
rw [add_comm]
exact h.add_mul_left_right z
theorem mul_add_right_right {x y : R} (h : IsCoprime x y) (z : R) : IsCoprime x (z * x + y) := by
rw [add_comm]
exact h.add_mul_right_right z
theorem add_mul_left_left_iff {x y z : R} : IsCoprime (x + y * z) y ↔ IsCoprime x y :=
⟨of_add_mul_left_left, fun h => h.add_mul_left_left z⟩
theorem add_mul_right_left_iff {x y z : R} : IsCoprime (x + z * y) y ↔ IsCoprime x y :=
⟨of_add_mul_right_left, fun h => h.add_mul_right_left z⟩
theorem add_mul_left_right_iff {x y z : R} : IsCoprime x (y + x * z) ↔ IsCoprime x y :=
⟨of_add_mul_left_right, fun h => h.add_mul_left_right z⟩
theorem add_mul_right_right_iff {x y z : R} : IsCoprime x (y + z * x) ↔ IsCoprime x y :=
⟨of_add_mul_right_right, fun h => h.add_mul_right_right z⟩
theorem mul_add_left_left_iff {x y z : R} : IsCoprime (y * z + x) y ↔ IsCoprime x y :=
⟨of_mul_add_left_left, fun h => h.mul_add_left_left z⟩
theorem mul_add_right_left_iff {x y z : R} : IsCoprime (z * y + x) y ↔ IsCoprime x y :=
⟨of_mul_add_right_left, fun h => h.mul_add_right_left z⟩
theorem mul_add_left_right_iff {x y z : R} : IsCoprime x (x * z + y) ↔ IsCoprime x y :=
⟨of_mul_add_left_right, fun h => h.mul_add_left_right z⟩
theorem mul_add_right_right_iff {x y z : R} : IsCoprime x (z * x + y) ↔ IsCoprime x y :=
⟨of_mul_add_right_right, fun h => h.mul_add_right_right z⟩
theorem neg_left {x y : R} (h : IsCoprime x y) : IsCoprime (-x) y := by
obtain ⟨a, b, h⟩ := h
use -a, b
rwa [neg_mul_neg]
| theorem neg_left_iff (x y : R) : IsCoprime (-x) y ↔ IsCoprime x y :=
⟨fun h => neg_neg x ▸ h.neg_left, neg_left⟩
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Coprime/Basic.lean | 356 | 358 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Ordering.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Synonym
/-!
# Comparison
This file provides basic results about orderings and comparison in linear orders.
## Definitions
* `CmpLE`: An `Ordering` from `≤`.
* `Ordering.Compares`: Turns an `Ordering` into `<` and `=` propositions.
* `linearOrderOfCompares`: Constructs a `LinearOrder` instance from the fact that any two
elements that are not one strictly less than the other either way are equal.
-/
variable {α β : Type*}
/-- Like `cmp`, but uses a `≤` on the type instead of `<`. Given two elements `x` and `y`, returns a
three-way comparison result `Ordering`. -/
def cmpLE {α} [LE α] [DecidableLE α] (x y : α) : Ordering :=
if x ≤ y then if y ≤ x then Ordering.eq else Ordering.lt else Ordering.gt
theorem cmpLE_swap {α} [LE α] [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α] (x y : α) :
(cmpLE x y).swap = cmpLE y x := by
by_cases xy : x ≤ y <;> by_cases yx : y ≤ x <;> simp [cmpLE, *, Ordering.swap]
cases not_or_intro xy yx (total_of _ _ _)
theorem cmpLE_eq_cmp {α} [Preorder α] [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [DecidableLE α] [DecidableLT α]
(x y : α) : cmpLE x y = cmp x y := by
by_cases xy : x ≤ y <;> by_cases yx : y ≤ x <;> simp [cmpLE, lt_iff_le_not_le, *, cmp, cmpUsing]
cases not_or_intro xy yx (total_of _ _ _)
namespace Ordering
theorem compares_swap [LT α] {a b : α} {o : Ordering} : o.swap.Compares a b ↔ o.Compares b a := by
cases o
· exact Iff.rfl
· exact eq_comm
· exact Iff.rfl
alias ⟨Compares.of_swap, Compares.swap⟩ := compares_swap
theorem swap_eq_iff_eq_swap {o o' : Ordering} : o.swap = o' ↔ o = o'.swap := by
rw [← swap_inj, swap_swap]
theorem Compares.eq_lt [Preorder α] : ∀ {o} {a b : α}, Compares o a b → (o = lt ↔ a < b)
| lt, _, _, h => ⟨fun _ => h, fun _ => rfl⟩
| eq, a, b, h => ⟨fun h => by injection h, fun h' => (ne_of_lt h' h).elim⟩
| gt, a, b, h => ⟨fun h => by injection h, fun h' => (lt_asymm h h').elim⟩
theorem Compares.ne_lt [Preorder α] : ∀ {o} {a b : α}, Compares o a b → (o ≠ lt ↔ b ≤ a)
| lt, _, _, h => ⟨absurd rfl, fun h' => (not_le_of_lt h h').elim⟩
| eq, _, _, h => ⟨fun _ => ge_of_eq h, fun _ h => by injection h⟩
| gt, _, _, h => ⟨fun _ => le_of_lt h, fun _ h => by injection h⟩
theorem Compares.eq_eq [Preorder α] : ∀ {o} {a b : α}, Compares o a b → (o = eq ↔ a = b)
| lt, a, b, h => ⟨fun h => by injection h, fun h' => (ne_of_lt h h').elim⟩
| eq, _, _, h => ⟨fun _ => h, fun _ => rfl⟩
| gt, a, b, h => ⟨fun h => by injection h, fun h' => (ne_of_gt h h').elim⟩
theorem Compares.eq_gt [Preorder α] {o} {a b : α} (h : Compares o a b) : o = gt ↔ b < a :=
swap_eq_iff_eq_swap.symm.trans h.swap.eq_lt
theorem Compares.ne_gt [Preorder α] {o} {a b : α} (h : Compares o a b) : o ≠ gt ↔ a ≤ b :=
(not_congr swap_eq_iff_eq_swap.symm).trans h.swap.ne_lt
theorem Compares.le_total [Preorder α] {a b : α} : ∀ {o}, Compares o a b → a ≤ b ∨ b ≤ a
| lt, h => Or.inl (le_of_lt h)
| eq, h => Or.inl (le_of_eq h)
| | gt, h => Or.inr (le_of_lt h)
| Mathlib/Order/Compare.lean | 78 | 79 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Continuity
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.IsUniformGroup.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Algebra
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.IsometricSMul
/-!
# Normed groups are uniform groups
This file proves lipschitzness of normed group operations and shows that normed groups are uniform
groups.
-/
variable {𝓕 E F : Type*}
open Filter Function Metric Bornology
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Uniformity Pointwise Topology
section SeminormedGroup
variable [SeminormedGroup E] [SeminormedGroup F] {s : Set E} {a b : E} {r : ℝ}
@[to_additive]
instance NormedGroup.to_isIsometricSMul_right : IsIsometricSMul Eᵐᵒᵖ E :=
⟨fun a => Isometry.of_dist_eq fun b c => by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem Isometry.norm_map_of_map_one {f : E → F} (hi : Isometry f) (h₁ : f 1 = 1) (x : E) :
‖f x‖ = ‖x‖ := by rw [← dist_one_right, ← h₁, hi.dist_eq, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_mul_self_right (a b : E) : dist b (a * b) = ‖a‖ := by
rw [← dist_one_left, ← dist_mul_right 1 a b, one_mul]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_mul_self_left (a b : E) : dist (a * b) b = ‖a‖ := by
rw [dist_comm, dist_mul_self_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_div_eq_dist_mul_left (a b c : E) : dist (a / b) c = dist a (c * b) := by
rw [← dist_mul_right _ _ b, div_mul_cancel]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_div_eq_dist_mul_right (a b c : E) : dist a (b / c) = dist (a * c) b := by
rw [← dist_mul_right _ _ c, div_mul_cancel]
open Finset
variable [FunLike 𝓕 E F]
/-- A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is Lipschitz, if there exists a constant `C` such that
for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`. The analogous condition for a linear map of
(semi)normed spaces is in `Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/OperatorNorm.lean`. -/
@[to_additive "A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is Lipschitz, if there exists a constant
`C` such that for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`. The analogous condition for a linear map of
(semi)normed spaces is in `Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/OperatorNorm.lean`."]
theorem MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) (C : ℝ)
(h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) : LipschitzWith (Real.toNNReal C) f :=
LipschitzWith.of_dist_le' fun x y => by simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div, map_div] using h (x / y)
@[to_additive]
theorem lipschitzOnWith_iff_norm_div_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0} :
LipschitzOnWith C f s ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ‖f x / f y‖ ≤ C * ‖x / y‖ := by
simp only [lipschitzOnWith_iff_dist_le_mul, dist_eq_norm_div]
alias ⟨LipschitzOnWith.norm_div_le, _⟩ := lipschitzOnWith_iff_norm_div_le
attribute [to_additive] LipschitzOnWith.norm_div_le
@[to_additive]
theorem LipschitzOnWith.norm_div_le_of_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0} (h : LipschitzOnWith C f s)
(ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) (hr : ‖a / b‖ ≤ r) : ‖f a / f b‖ ≤ C * r :=
(h.norm_div_le ha hb).trans <| by gcongr
@[to_additive]
theorem lipschitzWith_iff_norm_div_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0} :
LipschitzWith C f ↔ ∀ x y, ‖f x / f y‖ ≤ C * ‖x / y‖ := by
simp only [lipschitzWith_iff_dist_le_mul, dist_eq_norm_div]
alias ⟨LipschitzWith.norm_div_le, _⟩ := lipschitzWith_iff_norm_div_le
attribute [to_additive] LipschitzWith.norm_div_le
@[to_additive]
theorem LipschitzWith.norm_div_le_of_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0} (h : LipschitzWith C f)
(hr : ‖a / b‖ ≤ r) : ‖f a / f b‖ ≤ C * r :=
(h.norm_div_le _ _).trans <| by gcongr
/-- A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is continuous, if there exists a constant `C` such that
for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`. -/
@[to_additive "A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is continuous, if there exists a constant `C`
such that for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`"]
theorem MonoidHomClass.continuous_of_bound [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) (C : ℝ)
(h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) : Continuous f :=
(MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound f C h).continuous
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHomClass.uniformContinuous_of_bound [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) (C : ℝ)
(h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) : UniformContinuous f :=
(MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound f C h).uniformContinuous
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHomClass.isometry_iff_norm [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) :
Isometry f ↔ ∀ x, ‖f x‖ = ‖x‖ := by
simp only [isometry_iff_dist_eq, dist_eq_norm_div, ← map_div]
refine ⟨fun h x => ?_, fun h x y => h _⟩
simpa using h x 1
alias ⟨_, MonoidHomClass.isometry_of_norm⟩ := MonoidHomClass.isometry_iff_norm
attribute [to_additive] MonoidHomClass.isometry_of_norm
section NNNorm
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound_nnnorm [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) (C : ℝ≥0)
(h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ C * ‖x‖₊) : LipschitzWith C f :=
@Real.toNNReal_coe C ▸ MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound f C h
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHomClass.antilipschitz_of_bound [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) {K : ℝ≥0}
(h : ∀ x, ‖x‖ ≤ K * ‖f x‖) : AntilipschitzWith K f :=
AntilipschitzWith.of_le_mul_dist fun x y => by
simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div, map_div] using h (x / y)
@[to_additive LipschitzWith.norm_le_mul]
theorem LipschitzWith.norm_le_mul' {f : E → F} {K : ℝ≥0} (h : LipschitzWith K f) (hf : f 1 = 1)
(x) : ‖f x‖ ≤ K * ‖x‖ := by simpa only [dist_one_right, hf] using h.dist_le_mul x 1
@[to_additive LipschitzWith.nnorm_le_mul]
theorem LipschitzWith.nnorm_le_mul' {f : E → F} {K : ℝ≥0} (h : LipschitzWith K f) (hf : f 1 = 1)
(x) : ‖f x‖₊ ≤ K * ‖x‖₊ :=
h.norm_le_mul' hf x
@[to_additive AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_norm]
theorem AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_norm' {f : E → F} {K : ℝ≥0} (h : AntilipschitzWith K f)
(hf : f 1 = 1) (x) : ‖x‖ ≤ K * ‖f x‖ := by
simpa only [dist_one_right, hf] using h.le_mul_dist x 1
@[to_additive AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_nnnorm]
theorem AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_nnnorm' {f : E → F} {K : ℝ≥0} (h : AntilipschitzWith K f)
(hf : f 1 = 1) (x) : ‖x‖₊ ≤ K * ‖f x‖₊ :=
h.le_mul_norm' hf x
@[to_additive]
theorem OneHomClass.bound_of_antilipschitz [OneHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) {K : ℝ≥0}
(h : AntilipschitzWith K f) (x) : ‖x‖ ≤ K * ‖f x‖ :=
h.le_mul_nnnorm' (map_one f) x
@[to_additive]
theorem Isometry.nnnorm_map_of_map_one {f : E → F} (hi : Isometry f) (h₁ : f 1 = 1) (x : E) :
‖f x‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ :=
Subtype.ext <| hi.norm_map_of_map_one h₁ x
end NNNorm
@[to_additive lipschitzWith_one_norm]
theorem lipschitzWith_one_norm' : LipschitzWith 1 (norm : E → ℝ) := by
simpa using LipschitzWith.dist_right (1 : E)
@[to_additive lipschitzWith_one_nnnorm]
theorem lipschitzWith_one_nnnorm' : LipschitzWith 1 (NNNorm.nnnorm : E → ℝ≥0) :=
lipschitzWith_one_norm'
@[to_additive uniformContinuous_norm]
theorem uniformContinuous_norm' : UniformContinuous (norm : E → ℝ) :=
lipschitzWith_one_norm'.uniformContinuous
@[to_additive uniformContinuous_nnnorm]
theorem uniformContinuous_nnnorm' : UniformContinuous fun a : E => ‖a‖₊ :=
uniformContinuous_norm'.subtype_mk _
end SeminormedGroup
section SeminormedCommGroup
variable [SeminormedCommGroup E] [SeminormedCommGroup F] {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : E} {r₁ r₂ : ℝ}
@[to_additive]
instance NormedGroup.to_isIsometricSMul_left : IsIsometricSMul E E :=
⟨fun a => Isometry.of_dist_eq fun b c => by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_self_mul_right (a b : E) : dist a (a * b) = ‖b‖ := by
rw [← dist_one_left, ← dist_mul_left a 1 b, mul_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_self_mul_left (a b : E) : dist (a * b) a = ‖b‖ := by
rw [dist_comm, dist_self_mul_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1001)] -- Increase priority because `simp` can prove this
theorem dist_self_div_right (a b : E) : dist a (a / b) = ‖b‖ := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, dist_self_mul_right, norm_inv']
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1001)] -- Increase priority because `simp` can prove this
theorem dist_self_div_left (a b : E) : dist (a / b) a = ‖b‖ := by
rw [dist_comm, dist_self_div_right]
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_mul_mul_le (a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : E) : dist (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂) ≤ dist a₁ b₁ + dist a₂ b₂ := by
simpa only [dist_mul_left, dist_mul_right] using dist_triangle (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂)
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_mul_mul_le_of_le (h₁ : dist a₁ b₁ ≤ r₁) (h₂ : dist a₂ b₂ ≤ r₂) :
| dist (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂) ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(dist_mul_mul_le a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂).trans <| add_le_add h₁ h₂
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/Uniform.lean | 208 | 209 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Linear
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Comp
/-!
# Additive operations on derivatives
For detailed documentation of the Fréchet derivative,
see the module docstring of `Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Basic.lean`.
This file contains the usual formulas (and existence assertions) for the derivative of
* sum of finitely many functions
* multiplication of a function by a scalar constant
* negative of a function
* subtraction of two functions
-/
open Filter Asymptotics ContinuousLinearMap
noncomputable section
section
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {f g : E → F}
variable {f' g' : E →L[𝕜] F}
variable {x : E}
variable {s : Set E}
variable {L : Filter E}
section ConstSMul
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [Module R F] [SMulCommClass 𝕜 R F] [ContinuousConstSMul R F]
/-! ### Derivative of a function multiplied by a constant -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.const_smul (h : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) (c : R) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => c • f x) (c • f') x :=
(c • (1 : F →L[𝕜] F)).hasStrictFDerivAt.comp x h
theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.const_smul (h : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L) (c : R) :
HasFDerivAtFilter (fun x => c • f x) (c • f') x L :=
(c • (1 : F →L[𝕜] F)).hasFDerivAtFilter.comp x h tendsto_map
@[fun_prop]
nonrec theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.const_smul (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (c : R) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x => c • f x) (c • f') s x :=
h.const_smul c
@[fun_prop]
nonrec theorem HasFDerivAt.const_smul (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (c : R) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x => c • f x) (c • f') x :=
h.const_smul c
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.const_smul (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (c : R) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => c • f y) s x :=
(h.hasFDerivWithinAt.const_smul c).differentiableWithinAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.const_smul (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) (c : R) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => c • f y) x :=
(h.hasFDerivAt.const_smul c).differentiableAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableOn.const_smul (h : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (c : R) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => c • f y) s := fun x hx => (h x hx).const_smul c
@[fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.const_smul (h : Differentiable 𝕜 f) (c : R) :
Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => c • f y := fun x => (h x).const_smul c
theorem fderivWithin_const_smul (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x)
(h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (c : R) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y => c • f y) s x = c • fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x :=
(h.hasFDerivWithinAt.const_smul c).fderivWithin hxs
/-- Version of `fderivWithin_const_smul` written with `c • f` instead of `fun y ↦ c • f y`. -/
theorem fderivWithin_const_smul' (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x)
(h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (c : R) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (c • f) s x = c • fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x :=
fderivWithin_const_smul hxs h c
theorem fderiv_const_smul (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) (c : R) :
fderiv 𝕜 (fun y => c • f y) x = c • fderiv 𝕜 f x :=
(h.hasFDerivAt.const_smul c).fderiv
/-- Version of `fderiv_const_smul` written with `c • f` instead of `fun y ↦ c • f y`. -/
theorem fderiv_const_smul' (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) (c : R) :
fderiv 𝕜 (c • f) x = c • fderiv 𝕜 f x :=
(h.hasFDerivAt.const_smul c).fderiv
end ConstSMul
section Add
/-! ### Derivative of the sum of two functions -/
@[fun_prop]
nonrec theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.add (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x)
(hg : HasStrictFDerivAt g g' x) : HasStrictFDerivAt (fun y => f y + g y) (f' + g') x :=
.of_isLittleO <| (hf.isLittleO.add hg.isLittleO).congr_left fun y => by
simp only [LinearMap.sub_apply, LinearMap.add_apply, map_sub, map_add, add_apply]
abel
theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.add (hf : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L)
(hg : HasFDerivAtFilter g g' x L) : HasFDerivAtFilter (fun y => f y + g y) (f' + g') x L :=
.of_isLittleO <| (hf.isLittleO.add hg.isLittleO).congr_left fun _ => by
simp only [LinearMap.sub_apply, LinearMap.add_apply, map_sub, map_add, add_apply]
abel
@[fun_prop]
nonrec theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.add (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hg : HasFDerivWithinAt g g' s x) : HasFDerivWithinAt (fun y => f y + g y) (f' + g') s x :=
hf.add hg
@[fun_prop]
nonrec theorem HasFDerivAt.add (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasFDerivAt g g' x) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x => f x + g x) (f' + g') x :=
hf.add hg
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.add (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x)
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g s x) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => f y + g y) s x :=
(hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.add hg.hasFDerivWithinAt).differentiableWithinAt
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.add (hf : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => f y + g y) x :=
(hf.hasFDerivAt.add hg.hasFDerivAt).differentiableAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableOn.add (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (hg : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 g s) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => f y + g y) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).add (hg x hx)
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.add (hf : Differentiable 𝕜 f) (hg : Differentiable 𝕜 g) :
Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => f y + g y := fun x => (hf x).add (hg x)
theorem fderivWithin_add (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x)
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y => f y + g y) s x = fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x + fderivWithin 𝕜 g s x :=
(hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.add hg.hasFDerivWithinAt).fderivWithin hxs
/-- Version of `fderivWithin_add` where the function is written as `f + g` instead
of `fun y ↦ f y + g y`. -/
theorem fderivWithin_add' (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x)
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (f + g) s x = fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x + fderivWithin 𝕜 g s x :=
fderivWithin_add hxs hf hg
theorem fderiv_add (hf : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g x) :
fderiv 𝕜 (fun y => f y + g y) x = fderiv 𝕜 f x + fderiv 𝕜 g x :=
(hf.hasFDerivAt.add hg.hasFDerivAt).fderiv
/-- Version of `fderiv_add` where the function is written as `f + g` instead
of `fun y ↦ f y + g y`. -/
theorem fderiv_add' (hf : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g x) :
fderiv 𝕜 (f + g) x = fderiv 𝕜 f x + fderiv 𝕜 g x :=
fderiv_add hf hg
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_add_const_iff (c : F) :
HasFDerivAtFilter (f · + c) f' x L ↔ HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L := by
simp [hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS]
alias ⟨_, HasFDerivAtFilter.add_const⟩ := hasFDerivAtFilter_add_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_add_const_iff (c : F) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (f · + c) f' x ↔ HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x := by
simp [hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO]
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, HasStrictFDerivAt.add_const⟩ := hasStrictFDerivAt_add_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_add_const_iff (c : F) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (f · + c) f' s x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_add_const_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, HasFDerivWithinAt.add_const⟩ := hasFDerivWithinAt_add_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivAt_add_const_iff (c : F) : HasFDerivAt (f · + c) f' x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_add_const_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, HasFDerivAt.add_const⟩ := hasFDerivAt_add_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem differentiableWithinAt_add_const_iff (c : F) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => f y + c) s x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ hasFDerivWithinAt_add_const_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, DifferentiableWithinAt.add_const⟩ := differentiableWithinAt_add_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem differentiableAt_add_const_iff (c : F) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => f y + c) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ hasFDerivAt_add_const_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, DifferentiableAt.add_const⟩ := differentiableAt_add_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem differentiableOn_add_const_iff (c : F) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => f y + c) s ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s :=
forall₂_congr fun _ _ ↦ differentiableWithinAt_add_const_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, DifferentiableOn.add_const⟩ := differentiableOn_add_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem differentiable_add_const_iff (c : F) :
(Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => f y + c) ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f :=
forall_congr' fun _ ↦ differentiableAt_add_const_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, Differentiable.add_const⟩ := differentiable_add_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem fderivWithin_add_const (c : F) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y => f y + c) s x = fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x := by
classical simp [fderivWithin]
@[simp]
theorem fderiv_add_const (c : F) : fderiv 𝕜 (fun y => f y + c) x = fderiv 𝕜 f x := by
simp only [← fderivWithin_univ, fderivWithin_add_const]
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_const_add_iff (c : F) :
HasFDerivAtFilter (c + f ·) f' x L ↔ HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L := by
simpa only [add_comm] using hasFDerivAtFilter_add_const_iff c
alias ⟨_, HasFDerivAtFilter.const_add⟩ := hasFDerivAtFilter_const_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_const_add_iff (c : F) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (c + f ·) f' x ↔ HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x := by
simpa only [add_comm] using hasStrictFDerivAt_add_const_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, HasStrictFDerivAt.const_add⟩ := hasStrictFDerivAt_const_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_const_add_iff (c : F) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (c + f ·) f' s x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_const_add_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, HasFDerivWithinAt.const_add⟩ := hasFDerivWithinAt_const_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivAt_const_add_iff (c : F) : HasFDerivAt (c + f ·) f' x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_const_add_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, HasFDerivAt.const_add⟩ := hasFDerivAt_const_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem differentiableWithinAt_const_add_iff (c : F) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => c + f y) s x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ hasFDerivWithinAt_const_add_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, DifferentiableWithinAt.const_add⟩ := differentiableWithinAt_const_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem differentiableAt_const_add_iff (c : F) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => c + f y) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ hasFDerivAt_const_add_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, DifferentiableAt.const_add⟩ := differentiableAt_const_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem differentiableOn_const_add_iff (c : F) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => c + f y) s ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s :=
forall₂_congr fun _ _ ↦ differentiableWithinAt_const_add_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, DifferentiableOn.const_add⟩ := differentiableOn_const_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem differentiable_const_add_iff (c : F) :
(Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => c + f y) ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f :=
forall_congr' fun _ ↦ differentiableAt_const_add_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, Differentiable.const_add⟩ := differentiable_const_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem fderivWithin_const_add (c : F) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y => c + f y) s x = fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x := by
simpa only [add_comm] using fderivWithin_add_const c
@[simp]
theorem fderiv_const_add (c : F) : fderiv 𝕜 (fun y => c + f y) x = fderiv 𝕜 f x := by
simp only [add_comm c, fderiv_add_const]
end Add
section Sum
/-! ### Derivative of a finite sum of functions -/
variable {ι : Type*} {u : Finset ι} {A : ι → E → F} {A' : ι → E →L[𝕜] F}
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, HasStrictFDerivAt (A i) (A' i) x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun y => ∑ i ∈ u, A i y) (∑ i ∈ u, A' i) x := by
simp only [hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO] at *
convert IsLittleO.sum h
simp [Finset.sum_sub_distrib, ContinuousLinearMap.sum_apply]
theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, HasFDerivAtFilter (A i) (A' i) x L) :
HasFDerivAtFilter (fun y => ∑ i ∈ u, A i y) (∑ i ∈ u, A' i) x L := by
simp only [hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO] at *
convert IsLittleO.sum h
simp [ContinuousLinearMap.sum_apply]
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, HasFDerivWithinAt (A i) (A' i) s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun y => ∑ i ∈ u, A i y) (∑ i ∈ u, A' i) s x :=
HasFDerivAtFilter.sum h
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, HasFDerivAt (A i) (A' i) x) :
HasFDerivAt (fun y => ∑ i ∈ u, A i y) (∑ i ∈ u, A' i) x :=
HasFDerivAtFilter.sum h
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (A i) s x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => ∑ i ∈ u, A i y) s x :=
HasFDerivWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt <|
HasFDerivWithinAt.sum fun i hi => (h i hi).hasFDerivWithinAt
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (A i) x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => ∑ i ∈ u, A i y) x :=
HasFDerivAt.differentiableAt <| HasFDerivAt.sum fun i hi => (h i hi).hasFDerivAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableOn.sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (A i) s) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => ∑ i ∈ u, A i y) s := fun x hx =>
DifferentiableWithinAt.sum fun i hi => h i hi x hx
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, Differentiable 𝕜 (A i)) :
Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => ∑ i ∈ u, A i y := fun x => DifferentiableAt.sum fun i hi => h i hi x
theorem fderivWithin_sum (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x)
(h : ∀ i ∈ u, DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (A i) s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y => ∑ i ∈ u, A i y) s x = ∑ i ∈ u, fderivWithin 𝕜 (A i) s x :=
(HasFDerivWithinAt.sum fun i hi => (h i hi).hasFDerivWithinAt).fderivWithin hxs
theorem fderiv_sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (A i) x) :
fderiv 𝕜 (fun y => ∑ i ∈ u, A i y) x = ∑ i ∈ u, fderiv 𝕜 (A i) x :=
(HasFDerivAt.sum fun i hi => (h i hi).hasFDerivAt).fderiv
end Sum
section Neg
/-! ### Derivative of the negative of a function -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.neg (h : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => -f x) (-f') x :=
(-1 : F →L[𝕜] F).hasStrictFDerivAt.comp x h
theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.neg (h : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L) :
HasFDerivAtFilter (fun x => -f x) (-f') x L :=
(-1 : F →L[𝕜] F).hasFDerivAtFilter.comp x h tendsto_map
@[fun_prop]
nonrec theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.neg (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x => -f x) (-f') s x :=
h.neg
@[fun_prop]
nonrec theorem HasFDerivAt.neg (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) : HasFDerivAt (fun x => -f x) (-f') x :=
h.neg
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.neg (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => -f y) s x :=
h.hasFDerivWithinAt.neg.differentiableWithinAt
@[simp]
theorem differentiableWithinAt_neg_iff :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => -f y) s x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [neg_neg] using h.neg, fun h => h.neg⟩
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.neg (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => -f y) x :=
h.hasFDerivAt.neg.differentiableAt
@[simp]
theorem differentiableAt_neg_iff : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => -f y) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [neg_neg] using h.neg, fun h => h.neg⟩
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableOn.neg (h : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => -f y) s :=
fun x hx => (h x hx).neg
@[simp]
theorem differentiableOn_neg_iff : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => -f y) s ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [neg_neg] using h.neg, fun h => h.neg⟩
@[fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.neg (h : Differentiable 𝕜 f) : Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => -f y := fun x =>
(h x).neg
@[simp]
theorem differentiable_neg_iff : (Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => -f y) ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [neg_neg] using h.neg, fun h => h.neg⟩
theorem fderivWithin_neg (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y => -f y) s x = -fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x := by
classical
by_cases h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x
· exact h.hasFDerivWithinAt.neg.fderivWithin hxs
· rw [fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt h,
fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt, neg_zero]
simpa
/-- Version of `fderivWithin_neg` where the function is written `-f` instead of `fun y ↦ - f y`. -/
theorem fderivWithin_neg' (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (-f) s x = -fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x :=
fderivWithin_neg hxs
@[simp]
theorem fderiv_neg : fderiv 𝕜 (fun y => -f y) x = -fderiv 𝕜 f x := by
simp only [← fderivWithin_univ, fderivWithin_neg uniqueDiffWithinAt_univ]
/-- Version of `fderiv_neg` where the function is written `-f` instead of `fun y ↦ - f y`. -/
theorem fderiv_neg' : fderiv 𝕜 (-f) x = -fderiv 𝕜 f x :=
fderiv_neg
end Neg
section Sub
/-! ### Derivative of the difference of two functions -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.sub (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasStrictFDerivAt g g' x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => f x - g x) (f' - g') x := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add hg.neg
theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.sub (hf : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L) (hg : HasFDerivAtFilter g g' x L) :
HasFDerivAtFilter (fun x => f x - g x) (f' - g') x L := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add hg.neg
@[fun_prop]
nonrec theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.sub (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hg : HasFDerivWithinAt g g' s x) : HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x => f x - g x) (f' - g') s x :=
hf.sub hg
@[fun_prop]
nonrec theorem HasFDerivAt.sub (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasFDerivAt g g' x) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x => f x - g x) (f' - g') x :=
hf.sub hg
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.sub (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x)
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g s x) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => f y - g y) s x :=
(hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.sub hg.hasFDerivWithinAt).differentiableWithinAt
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.sub (hf : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => f y - g y) x :=
(hf.hasFDerivAt.sub hg.hasFDerivAt).differentiableAt
@[simp]
lemma DifferentiableAt.add_iff_left (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => f y + g y) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun hf ↦ hf.add hg⟩
simpa only [add_sub_cancel_right] using h.sub hg
@[simp]
lemma DifferentiableAt.add_iff_right (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => f y + g y) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g x := by
simp only [add_comm (f _), hg.add_iff_left]
@[simp]
lemma DifferentiableAt.sub_iff_left (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => f y - g y) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, differentiableAt_neg_iff, hg, add_iff_left]
@[simp]
lemma DifferentiableAt.sub_iff_right (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => f y - g y) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g x := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, hg, add_iff_right, differentiableAt_neg_iff]
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableOn.sub (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (hg : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 g s) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => f y - g y) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).sub (hg x hx)
@[simp]
lemma DifferentiableOn.add_iff_left (hg : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 g s) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => f y + g y) s ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun hf ↦ hf.add hg⟩
simpa only [add_sub_cancel_right] using h.sub hg
@[simp]
lemma DifferentiableOn.add_iff_right (hg : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => f y + g y) s ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 g s := by
simp only [add_comm (f _), hg.add_iff_left]
@[simp]
lemma DifferentiableOn.sub_iff_left (hg : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 g s) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => f y - g y) s ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, differentiableOn_neg_iff, hg, add_iff_left]
@[simp]
lemma DifferentiableOn.sub_iff_right (hg : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => f y - g y) s ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 g s := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, differentiableOn_neg_iff, hg, add_iff_right]
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.sub (hf : Differentiable 𝕜 f) (hg : Differentiable 𝕜 g) :
Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => f y - g y := fun x => (hf x).sub (hg x)
@[simp]
lemma Differentiable.add_iff_left (hg : Differentiable 𝕜 g) :
Differentiable 𝕜 (fun y => f y + g y) ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun hf ↦ hf.add hg⟩
simpa only [add_sub_cancel_right] using h.sub hg
@[simp]
lemma Differentiable.add_iff_right (hg : Differentiable 𝕜 f) :
Differentiable 𝕜 (fun y => f y + g y) ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 g := by
simp only [add_comm (f _), hg.add_iff_left]
@[simp]
lemma Differentiable.sub_iff_left (hg : Differentiable 𝕜 g) :
Differentiable 𝕜 (fun y => f y - g y) ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, differentiable_neg_iff, hg, add_iff_left]
@[simp]
lemma Differentiable.sub_iff_right (hg : Differentiable 𝕜 f) :
Differentiable 𝕜 (fun y => f y - g y) ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 g := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, differentiable_neg_iff, hg, add_iff_right]
theorem fderivWithin_sub (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x)
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y => f y - g y) s x = fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x - fderivWithin 𝕜 g s x :=
(hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.sub hg.hasFDerivWithinAt).fderivWithin hxs
/-- Version of `fderivWithin_sub` where the function is written as `f - g` instead
of `fun y ↦ f y - g y`. -/
theorem fderivWithin_sub' (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x)
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (f - g) s x = fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x - fderivWithin 𝕜 g s x :=
fderivWithin_sub hxs hf hg
theorem fderiv_sub (hf : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g x) :
fderiv 𝕜 (fun y => f y - g y) x = fderiv 𝕜 f x - fderiv 𝕜 g x :=
(hf.hasFDerivAt.sub hg.hasFDerivAt).fderiv
/-- Version of `fderiv_sub` where the function is written as `f - g` instead
of `fun y ↦ f y - g y`. -/
theorem fderiv_sub' (hf : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g x) :
fderiv 𝕜 (f - g) x = fderiv 𝕜 f x - fderiv 𝕜 g x :=
fderiv_sub hf hg
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_sub_const_iff (c : F) :
HasFDerivAtFilter (f · - c) f' x L ↔ HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, hasFDerivAtFilter_add_const_iff]
alias ⟨_, HasFDerivAtFilter.sub_const⟩ := hasFDerivAtFilter_sub_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_sub_const_iff (c : F) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (f · - c) f' x ↔ HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, hasStrictFDerivAt_add_const_iff]
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, HasStrictFDerivAt.sub_const⟩ := hasStrictFDerivAt_sub_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_sub_const_iff (c : F) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (f · - c) f' s x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_sub_const_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, HasFDerivWithinAt.sub_const⟩ := hasFDerivWithinAt_sub_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivAt_sub_const_iff (c : F) : HasFDerivAt (f · - c) f' x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_sub_const_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, HasFDerivAt.sub_const⟩ := hasFDerivAt_sub_const_iff
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_sub_const {x : F} (c : F) : HasStrictFDerivAt (· - c) (id 𝕜 F) x :=
(hasStrictFDerivAt_id x).sub_const c
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasFDerivAt_sub_const {x : F} (c : F) : HasFDerivAt (· - c) (id 𝕜 F) x :=
(hasFDerivAt_id x).sub_const c
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.sub_const (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (c : F) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => f y - c) s x :=
(hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.sub_const c).differentiableWithinAt
@[simp]
theorem differentiableWithinAt_sub_const_iff (c : F) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => f y - c) s x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, differentiableWithinAt_add_const_iff]
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.sub_const (hf : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) (c : F) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => f y - c) x :=
(hf.hasFDerivAt.sub_const c).differentiableAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableOn.sub_const (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (c : F) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => f y - c) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).sub_const c
| @[fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.sub_const (hf : Differentiable 𝕜 f) (c : F) :
Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => f y - c := fun x => (hf x).sub_const c
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Add.lean | 642 | 644 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Log
/-! # Power function on `ℂ`
We construct the power functions `x ^ y`, where `x` and `y` are complex numbers.
-/
open Real Topology Filter ComplexConjugate Finset Set
namespace Complex
/-- The complex power function `x ^ y`, given by `x ^ y = exp(y log x)` (where `log` is the
principal determination of the logarithm), unless `x = 0` where one sets `0 ^ 0 = 1` and
`0 ^ y = 0` for `y ≠ 0`. -/
noncomputable def cpow (x y : ℂ) : ℂ :=
if x = 0 then if y = 0 then 1 else 0 else exp (log x * y)
noncomputable instance : Pow ℂ ℂ :=
⟨cpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem cpow_eq_pow (x y : ℂ) : cpow x y = x ^ y :=
rfl
theorem cpow_def (x y : ℂ) : x ^ y = if x = 0 then if y = 0 then 1 else 0 else exp (log x * y) :=
rfl
theorem cpow_def_of_ne_zero {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℂ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) :=
if_neg hx
@[simp]
theorem cpow_zero (x : ℂ) : x ^ (0 : ℂ) = 1 := by simp [cpow_def]
@[simp]
theorem cpow_eq_zero_iff (x y : ℂ) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 := by
simp only [cpow_def]
split_ifs <;> simp [*, exp_ne_zero]
theorem cpow_ne_zero_iff {x y : ℂ} :
x ^ y ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∨ y = 0 := by
rw [ne_eq, cpow_eq_zero_iff, not_and_or, ne_eq, not_not]
theorem cpow_ne_zero_iff_of_exponent_ne_zero {x y : ℂ} (hy : y ≠ 0) :
x ^ y ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 := by simp [hy]
@[simp]
theorem zero_cpow {x : ℂ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℂ) ^ x = 0 := by simp [cpow_def, *]
theorem zero_cpow_eq_iff {x : ℂ} {a : ℂ} : (0 : ℂ) ^ x = a ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ a = 0 ∨ x = 0 ∧ a = 1 := by
constructor
· intro hyp
simp only [cpow_def, eq_self_iff_true, if_true] at hyp
by_cases h : x = 0
· subst h
simp only [if_true, eq_self_iff_true] at hyp
right
exact ⟨rfl, hyp.symm⟩
· rw [if_neg h] at hyp
left
exact ⟨h, hyp.symm⟩
· rintro (⟨h, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)
· exact zero_cpow h
· exact cpow_zero _
theorem eq_zero_cpow_iff {x : ℂ} {a : ℂ} : a = (0 : ℂ) ^ x ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ a = 0 ∨ x = 0 ∧ a = 1 := by
rw [← zero_cpow_eq_iff, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem cpow_one (x : ℂ) : x ^ (1 : ℂ) = x :=
if hx : x = 0 then by simp [hx, cpow_def]
else by rw [cpow_def, if_neg (one_ne_zero : (1 : ℂ) ≠ 0), if_neg hx, mul_one, exp_log hx]
@[simp]
theorem one_cpow (x : ℂ) : (1 : ℂ) ^ x = 1 := by
rw [cpow_def]
split_ifs <;> simp_all [one_ne_zero]
theorem cpow_add {x : ℂ} (y z : ℂ) (hx : x ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
simp only [cpow_def, ite_mul, boole_mul, mul_ite, mul_boole]
simp_all [exp_add, mul_add]
theorem cpow_mul {x y : ℂ} (z : ℂ) (h₁ : -π < (log x * y).im) (h₂ : (log x * y).im ≤ π) :
x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z := by
simp only [cpow_def]
split_ifs <;> simp_all [exp_ne_zero, log_exp h₁ h₂, mul_assoc]
theorem cpow_neg (x y : ℂ) : x ^ (-y) = (x ^ y)⁻¹ := by
simp only [cpow_def, neg_eq_zero, mul_neg]
split_ifs <;> simp [exp_neg]
theorem cpow_sub {x : ℂ} (y z : ℂ) (hx : x ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, cpow_add _ _ hx, cpow_neg, div_eq_mul_inv]
theorem cpow_neg_one (x : ℂ) : x ^ (-1 : ℂ) = x⁻¹ := by simpa using cpow_neg x 1
/-- See also `Complex.cpow_int_mul'`. -/
lemma cpow_int_mul (x : ℂ) (n : ℤ) (y : ℂ) : x ^ (n * y) = (x ^ y) ^ n := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with rfl | hx
· rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with rfl | hn
· simp
· rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with rfl | hy <;> simp [*, zero_zpow]
· rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hx, cpow_def_of_ne_zero hx, mul_left_comm, exp_int_mul]
lemma cpow_mul_int (x y : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (y * n) = (x ^ y) ^ n := by rw [mul_comm, cpow_int_mul]
lemma cpow_nat_mul (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) (y : ℂ) : x ^ (n * y) = (x ^ y) ^ n :=
mod_cast cpow_int_mul x n y
lemma cpow_ofNat_mul (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (y : ℂ) :
x ^ (ofNat(n) * y) = (x ^ y) ^ ofNat(n) :=
cpow_nat_mul x n y
lemma cpow_mul_nat (x y : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y * n) = (x ^ y) ^ n := by
rw [mul_comm, cpow_nat_mul]
| lemma cpow_mul_ofNat (x y : ℂ) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/Complex.lean | 122 | 122 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.NegOnePow
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Periodic
import Mathlib.Algebra.QuadraticDiscriminant
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Exp
/-!
# Trigonometric functions
## Main definitions
This file contains the definition of `π`.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse` and
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Arctan` for the inverse trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Arg` and
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Log` for the complex argument function
and the complex logarithm.
## Main statements
Many basic inequalities on the real trigonometric functions are established.
The continuity of the usual trigonometric functions is proved.
Several facts about the real trigonometric functions have the proofs deferred to
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Complex`,
as they are most easily proved by appealing to the corresponding fact for
complex trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Chebyshev` for the multiple angle formulas
in terms of Chebyshev polynomials.
## Tags
sin, cos, tan, angle
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology Filter Set
namespace Complex
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp (-z * I) - exp (z * I)) * I / 2
fun_prop
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_sin {s : Set ℂ} : ContinuousOn sin s :=
continuous_sin.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp (z * I) + exp (-z * I)) / 2
fun_prop
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_cos {s : Set ℂ} : ContinuousOn cos s :=
continuous_cos.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sinh : Continuous sinh := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp z - exp (-z)) / 2
fun_prop
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cosh : Continuous cosh := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp z + exp (-z)) / 2
fun_prop
end Complex
namespace Real
variable {x y z : ℝ}
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_sin.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_sin {s} : ContinuousOn sin s :=
continuous_sin.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_cos.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_cos {s} : ContinuousOn cos s :=
continuous_cos.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sinh : Continuous sinh :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_sinh.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cosh : Continuous cosh :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_cosh.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
end Real
namespace Real
theorem exists_cos_eq_zero : 0 ∈ cos '' Icc (1 : ℝ) 2 :=
intermediate_value_Icc' (by norm_num) continuousOn_cos
⟨le_of_lt cos_two_neg, le_of_lt cos_one_pos⟩
/-- The number π = 3.14159265... Defined here using choice as twice a zero of cos in [1,2], from
which one can derive all its properties. For explicit bounds on π, see `Data.Real.Pi.Bounds`.
Denoted `π`, once the `Real` namespace is opened. -/
protected noncomputable def pi : ℝ :=
2 * Classical.choose exists_cos_eq_zero
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "π" => Real.pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_two : cos (π / 2) = 0 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).2
theorem one_le_pi_div_two : (1 : ℝ) ≤ π / 2 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).1.1
theorem pi_div_two_le_two : π / 2 ≤ 2 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).1.2
theorem two_le_pi : (2 : ℝ) ≤ π :=
(div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right (show (0 : ℝ) < 2 by norm_num)).1
(by rw [div_self (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]; exact one_le_pi_div_two)
theorem pi_le_four : π ≤ 4 :=
(div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right (show (0 : ℝ) < 2 by norm_num)).1
(calc
π / 2 ≤ 2 := pi_div_two_le_two
_ = 4 / 2 := by norm_num)
@[bound]
theorem pi_pos : 0 < π :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (by norm_num) two_le_pi
@[bound]
theorem pi_nonneg : 0 ≤ π :=
pi_pos.le
theorem pi_ne_zero : π ≠ 0 :=
pi_pos.ne'
theorem pi_div_two_pos : 0 < π / 2 :=
half_pos pi_pos
theorem two_pi_pos : 0 < 2 * π := by linarith [pi_pos]
end Real
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean.Meta Qq
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: `π` is always positive. -/
@[positivity Real.pi]
def evalRealPi : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(Real.pi) =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.positive q(Real.pi_pos))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not Real.pi"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
namespace NNReal
open Real
open Real NNReal
/-- `π` considered as a nonnegative real. -/
noncomputable def pi : ℝ≥0 :=
⟨π, Real.pi_pos.le⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_real_pi : (pi : ℝ) = π :=
rfl
theorem pi_pos : 0 < pi := mod_cast Real.pi_pos
theorem pi_ne_zero : pi ≠ 0 :=
pi_pos.ne'
end NNReal
namespace Real
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi : sin π = 0 := by
rw [← mul_div_cancel_left₀ π (two_ne_zero' ℝ), two_mul, add_div, sin_add, cos_pi_div_two]; simp
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi : cos π = -1 := by
rw [← mul_div_cancel_left₀ π (two_ne_zero' ℝ), mul_div_assoc, cos_two_mul, cos_pi_div_two]
norm_num
@[simp]
theorem sin_two_pi : sin (2 * π) = 0 := by simp [two_mul, sin_add]
@[simp]
theorem cos_two_pi : cos (2 * π) = 1 := by simp [two_mul, cos_add]
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin π := by simp [sin_add]
theorem sin_periodic : Function.Periodic sin (2 * π) :=
sin_antiperiodic.periodic_two_mul
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x + π) = -sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic x
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_two_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x + 2 * π) = sin x :=
sin_periodic x
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x - π) = -sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq x
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_two_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x - 2 * π) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_eq x
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (π - x) = sin x :=
neg_neg (sin x) ▸ sin_neg x ▸ sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq'
@[simp]
theorem sin_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (2 * π - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.sub_eq'
@[simp]
theorem sin_nat_mul_pi (n : ℕ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
sin_antiperiodic.nat_mul_eq_of_eq_zero sin_zero n
@[simp]
theorem sin_int_mul_pi (n : ℤ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
sin_antiperiodic.int_mul_eq_of_eq_zero sin_zero n
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x + n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.nat_mul n x
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x + n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.int_mul n x
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x - n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x - n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
@[simp]
theorem sin_nat_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (n * (2 * π) - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
@[simp]
theorem sin_int_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (n * (2 * π) - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem sin_add_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ sin_antiperiodic.add_int_mul_eq n
theorem sin_add_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.add_nat_mul_eq n
theorem sin_sub_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ sin_antiperiodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
theorem sin_sub_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
theorem sin_int_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (n * π - x) = -((-1) ^ n * sin x) := by
simpa only [sin_neg, mul_neg, Int.cast_negOnePow] using sin_antiperiodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem sin_nat_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (n * π - x) = -((-1) ^ n * sin x) := by
simpa only [sin_neg, mul_neg] using sin_antiperiodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic cos π := by simp [cos_add]
theorem cos_periodic : Function.Periodic cos (2 * π) :=
cos_antiperiodic.periodic_two_mul
@[simp]
theorem abs_cos_int_mul_pi (k : ℤ) : |cos (k * π)| = 1 := by
simp [abs_cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq]
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x + π) = -cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic x
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_two_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x + 2 * π) = cos x :=
cos_periodic x
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x - π) = -cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq x
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_two_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x - 2 * π) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_eq x
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (π - x) = -cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq'
@[simp]
theorem cos_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (2 * π - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.sub_eq'
@[simp]
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
(cos_periodic.nat_mul_eq n).trans cos_zero
@[simp]
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
(cos_periodic.int_mul_eq n).trans cos_zero
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x + n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.nat_mul n x
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x + n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.int_mul n x
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x - n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x - n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
@[simp]
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
@[simp]
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_add_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ cos_antiperiodic.add_int_mul_eq n
theorem cos_add_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.add_nat_mul_eq n
theorem cos_sub_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ cos_antiperiodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
theorem cos_sub_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
theorem cos_int_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (n * π - x) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_nat_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (n * π - x) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_add_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) + π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.nat_mul n).add_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi_add_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) + π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.int_mul n).add_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.nat_mul n).sub_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.int_mul n).sub_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
theorem sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 < x) (hxp : x < π) : 0 < sin x :=
if hx2 : x ≤ 2 then sin_pos_of_pos_of_le_two h0x hx2
else
have : (2 : ℝ) + 2 = 4 := by norm_num
have : π - x ≤ 2 :=
sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (le_trans pi_le_four (this ▸ add_le_add_left (le_of_not_ge hx2) _))
sin_pi_sub x ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_le_two (sub_pos.2 hxp) this
theorem sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ioo 0 π) : 0 < sin x :=
sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi hx.1 hx.2
theorem sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc 0 π) : 0 ≤ sin x := by
rw [← closure_Ioo pi_ne_zero.symm] at hx
exact
closure_lt_subset_le continuous_const continuous_sin
(closure_mono (fun y => sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo) hx)
theorem sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 ≤ x) (hxp : x ≤ π) : 0 ≤ sin x :=
sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨h0x, hxp⟩
theorem sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x < 0) (hpx : -π < x) : sin x < 0 :=
neg_pos.1 <| sin_neg x ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi (neg_pos.2 hx0) (neg_lt.1 hpx)
theorem sin_nonpos_of_nonnpos_of_neg_pi_le {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x ≤ 0) (hpx : -π ≤ x) : sin x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 <| sin_neg x ▸ sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi (neg_nonneg.2 hx0) (neg_le.1 hpx)
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_two : sin (π / 2) = 1 :=
have : sin (π / 2) = 1 ∨ sin (π / 2) = -1 := by
simpa [sq, mul_self_eq_one_iff] using sin_sq_add_cos_sq (π / 2)
this.resolve_right fun h =>
show ¬(0 : ℝ) < -1 by norm_num <|
h ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi pi_div_two_pos (half_lt_self pi_pos)
theorem sin_add_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : sin (x + π / 2) = cos x := by simp [sin_add]
theorem sin_sub_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : sin (x - π / 2) = -cos x := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add]
theorem sin_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (π / 2 - x) = cos x := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add]
theorem cos_add_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : cos (x + π / 2) = -sin x := by simp [cos_add]
theorem cos_sub_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : cos (x - π / 2) = sin x := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, cos_add]
theorem cos_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (π / 2 - x) = sin x := by
rw [← cos_neg, neg_sub, cos_sub_pi_div_two]
theorem cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : 0 < cos x :=
sin_add_pi_div_two x ▸ sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨by linarith [hx.1], by linarith [hx.2]⟩
theorem cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : 0 ≤ cos x :=
sin_add_pi_div_two x ▸ sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith [hx.1], by linarith [hx.2]⟩
theorem cos_nonneg_of_neg_pi_div_two_le_of_le {x : ℝ} (hl : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hu : x ≤ π / 2) :
0 ≤ cos x :=
cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨hl, hu⟩
theorem cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : π / 2 < x) (hx₂ : x < π + π / 2) :
cos x < 0 :=
neg_pos.1 <| cos_pi_sub x ▸ cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩
theorem cos_nonpos_of_pi_div_two_le_of_le {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : π / 2 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π + π / 2) :
cos x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 <| cos_pi_sub x ▸ cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩
theorem sin_eq_sqrt_one_sub_cos_sq {x : ℝ} (hl : 0 ≤ x) (hu : x ≤ π) :
sin x = √(1 - cos x ^ 2) := by
rw [← abs_sin_eq_sqrt_one_sub_cos_sq, abs_of_nonneg (sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hl hu)]
theorem cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq {x : ℝ} (hl : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hu : x ≤ π / 2) :
cos x = √(1 - sin x ^ 2) := by
rw [← abs_cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq, abs_of_nonneg (cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨hl, hu⟩)]
lemma cos_half {x : ℝ} (hl : -π ≤ x) (hr : x ≤ π) : cos (x / 2) = sqrt ((1 + cos x) / 2) := by
have : 0 ≤ cos (x / 2) := cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc <| by constructor <;> linarith
rw [← sqrt_sq this, cos_sq, add_div, two_mul, add_halves]
lemma abs_sin_half (x : ℝ) : |sin (x / 2)| = sqrt ((1 - cos x) / 2) := by
rw [← sqrt_sq_eq_abs, sin_sq_eq_half_sub, two_mul, add_halves, sub_div]
lemma sin_half_eq_sqrt {x : ℝ} (hl : 0 ≤ x) (hr : x ≤ 2 * π) :
sin (x / 2) = sqrt ((1 - cos x) / 2) := by
rw [← abs_sin_half, abs_of_nonneg]
apply sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi <;> linarith
lemma sin_half_eq_neg_sqrt {x : ℝ} (hl : -(2 * π) ≤ x) (hr : x ≤ 0) :
sin (x / 2) = -sqrt ((1 - cos x) / 2) := by
rw [← abs_sin_half, abs_of_nonpos, neg_neg]
apply sin_nonpos_of_nonnpos_of_neg_pi_le <;> linarith
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff_of_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -π < x) (hx₂ : x < π) : sin x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by
contrapose! h
cases h.lt_or_lt with
| inl h0 => exact (sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt h0 hx₁).ne
| inr h0 => exact (sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h0 hx₂).ne',
fun h => by simp [h]⟩
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : sin x = 0 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * π = x :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨⌊x / π⌋,
le_antisymm (sub_nonneg.1 (Int.sub_floor_div_mul_nonneg _ pi_pos))
(sub_nonpos.1 <|
le_of_not_gt fun h₃ =>
(sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h₃ (Int.sub_floor_div_mul_lt _ pi_pos)).ne
(by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add, h, sin_int_mul_pi]))⟩,
fun ⟨_, hn⟩ => hn ▸ sin_int_mul_pi _⟩
theorem sin_ne_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : sin x ≠ 0 ↔ ∀ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * π ≠ x := by
rw [← not_exists, not_iff_not, sin_eq_zero_iff]
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq {x : ℝ} : sin x = 0 ↔ cos x = 1 ∨ cos x = -1 := by
rw [← mul_self_eq_one_iff, ← sin_sq_add_cos_sq x, sq, sq, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add, sub_self]
exact ⟨fun h => by rw [h, mul_zero], eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero ∘ Eq.symm⟩
theorem cos_eq_one_iff (x : ℝ) : cos x = 1 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * (2 * π) = x :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := sin_eq_zero_iff.1 (sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq.2 (Or.inl h))
⟨n / 2,
(Int.emod_two_eq_zero_or_one n).elim
(fun hn0 => by
rwa [← mul_assoc, ← @Int.cast_two ℝ, ← Int.cast_mul,
Int.ediv_mul_cancel (Int.dvd_iff_emod_eq_zero.2 hn0)])
fun hn1 => by
rw [← Int.emod_add_ediv n 2, hn1, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one, add_mul, one_mul, add_comm,
mul_comm (2 : ℤ), Int.cast_mul, mul_assoc, Int.cast_two] at hn
rw [← hn, cos_int_mul_two_pi_add_pi] at h
exact absurd h (by norm_num)⟩,
fun ⟨_, hn⟩ => hn ▸ cos_int_mul_two_pi _⟩
theorem cos_eq_one_iff_of_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(2 * π) < x) (hx₂ : x < 2 * π) :
cos x = 1 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases (cos_eq_one_iff _).1 h with ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [mul_lt_iff_lt_one_left two_pi_pos] at hx₂
rw [neg_lt, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, mul_lt_iff_lt_one_left two_pi_pos] at hx₁
norm_cast at hx₁ hx₂
obtain rfl : n = 0 := le_antisymm (by omega) (by omega)
simp, fun h => by simp [h]⟩
theorem sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2)
(hxy : x < y) : sin x < sin y := by
rw [← sub_pos, sin_sub_sin]
have : 0 < sin ((y - x) / 2) := by apply sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi <;> linarith
have : 0 < cos ((y + x) / 2) := by refine cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> linarith
positivity
theorem strictMonoOn_sin : StrictMonoOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) := fun _ hx _ hy hxy =>
sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two hx.1 hy.2 hxy
theorem cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π) (hxy : x < y) :
cos y < cos x := by
rw [← sin_pi_div_two_sub, ← sin_pi_div_two_sub]
apply sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two <;> linarith
theorem cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2)
(hxy : x < y) : cos y < cos x :=
cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hx₁ (hy₂.trans (by linarith)) hxy
theorem strictAntiOn_cos : StrictAntiOn cos (Icc 0 π) := fun _ hx _ hy hxy =>
cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hx.1 hy.2 hxy
theorem cos_le_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π) (hxy : x ≤ y) :
cos y ≤ cos x :=
(strictAntiOn_cos.le_iff_le ⟨hx₁.trans hxy, hy₂⟩ ⟨hx₁, hxy.trans hy₂⟩).2 hxy
theorem sin_le_sin_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2)
(hxy : x ≤ y) : sin x ≤ sin y :=
(strictMonoOn_sin.le_iff_le ⟨hx₁, hxy.trans hy₂⟩ ⟨hx₁.trans hxy, hy₂⟩).2 hxy
theorem injOn_sin : InjOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :=
strictMonoOn_sin.injOn
theorem injOn_cos : InjOn cos (Icc 0 π) :=
strictAntiOn_cos.injOn
theorem surjOn_sin : SurjOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (Icc (-1) 1) := by
simpa only [sin_neg, sin_pi_div_two] using
intermediate_value_Icc (neg_le_self pi_div_two_pos.le) continuous_sin.continuousOn
theorem surjOn_cos : SurjOn cos (Icc 0 π) (Icc (-1) 1) := by
simpa only [cos_zero, cos_pi] using intermediate_value_Icc' pi_pos.le continuous_cos.continuousOn
theorem sin_mem_Icc (x : ℝ) : sin x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1 :=
⟨neg_one_le_sin x, sin_le_one x⟩
theorem cos_mem_Icc (x : ℝ) : cos x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1 :=
⟨neg_one_le_cos x, cos_le_one x⟩
theorem mapsTo_sin (s : Set ℝ) : MapsTo sin s (Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) := fun x _ => sin_mem_Icc x
theorem mapsTo_cos (s : Set ℝ) : MapsTo cos s (Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) := fun x _ => cos_mem_Icc x
theorem bijOn_sin : BijOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (Icc (-1) 1) :=
⟨mapsTo_sin _, injOn_sin, surjOn_sin⟩
theorem bijOn_cos : BijOn cos (Icc 0 π) (Icc (-1) 1) :=
⟨mapsTo_cos _, injOn_cos, surjOn_cos⟩
@[simp]
theorem range_cos : range cos = (Icc (-1) 1 : Set ℝ) :=
Subset.antisymm (range_subset_iff.2 cos_mem_Icc) surjOn_cos.subset_range
@[simp]
theorem range_sin : range sin = (Icc (-1) 1 : Set ℝ) :=
Subset.antisymm (range_subset_iff.2 sin_mem_Icc) surjOn_sin.subset_range
theorem range_cos_infinite : (range Real.cos).Infinite := by
rw [Real.range_cos]
exact Icc_infinite (by norm_num)
theorem range_sin_infinite : (range Real.sin).Infinite := by
rw [Real.range_sin]
exact Icc_infinite (by norm_num)
section CosDivSq
variable (x : ℝ)
/-- the series `sqrtTwoAddSeries x n` is `sqrt(2 + sqrt(2 + ... ))` with `n` square roots,
starting with `x`. We define it here because `cos (pi / 2 ^ (n+1)) = sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n / 2`
-/
@[simp]
noncomputable def sqrtTwoAddSeries (x : ℝ) : ℕ → ℝ
| 0 => x
| n + 1 => √(2 + sqrtTwoAddSeries x n)
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_zero : sqrtTwoAddSeries x 0 = x := by simp
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_one : sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 1 = √2 := by simp
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_two : sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 2 = √(2 + √2) := by simp
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_zero_nonneg : ∀ n : ℕ, 0 ≤ sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n
| 0 => le_refl 0
| _ + 1 => sqrt_nonneg _
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_nonneg {x : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ x) : ∀ n : ℕ, 0 ≤ sqrtTwoAddSeries x n
| 0 => h
| _ + 1 => sqrt_nonneg _
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_lt_two : ∀ n : ℕ, sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n < 2
| 0 => by norm_num
| n + 1 => by
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ (sqrt_sq zero_lt_two.le).le
rw [sqrtTwoAddSeries, sqrt_lt_sqrt_iff, ← lt_sub_iff_add_lt']
· refine (sqrtTwoAddSeries_lt_two n).trans_le ?_
norm_num
· exact add_nonneg zero_le_two (sqrtTwoAddSeries_zero_nonneg n)
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_succ (x : ℝ) :
∀ n : ℕ, sqrtTwoAddSeries x (n + 1) = sqrtTwoAddSeries (√(2 + x)) n
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by rw [sqrtTwoAddSeries, sqrtTwoAddSeries_succ _ _, sqrtTwoAddSeries]
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_monotone_left {x y : ℝ} (h : x ≤ y) :
∀ n : ℕ, sqrtTwoAddSeries x n ≤ sqrtTwoAddSeries y n
| 0 => h
| n + 1 => by
rw [sqrtTwoAddSeries, sqrtTwoAddSeries]
exact sqrt_le_sqrt (add_le_add_left (sqrtTwoAddSeries_monotone_left h _) _)
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_over_two_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, cos (π / 2 ^ (n + 1)) = sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n / 2
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by
have A : (1 : ℝ) < 2 ^ (n + 1) := one_lt_pow₀ one_lt_two n.succ_ne_zero
have B : π / 2 ^ (n + 1) < π := div_lt_self pi_pos A
have C : 0 < π / 2 ^ (n + 1) := by positivity
rw [pow_succ, div_mul_eq_div_div, cos_half, cos_pi_over_two_pow n, sqrtTwoAddSeries,
add_div_eq_mul_add_div, one_mul, ← div_mul_eq_div_div, sqrt_div, sqrt_mul_self] <;>
linarith [sqrtTwoAddSeries_nonneg le_rfl n]
theorem sin_sq_pi_over_two_pow (n : ℕ) :
sin (π / 2 ^ (n + 1)) ^ 2 = 1 - (sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n / 2) ^ 2 := by
rw [sin_sq, cos_pi_over_two_pow]
theorem sin_sq_pi_over_two_pow_succ (n : ℕ) :
sin (π / 2 ^ (n + 2)) ^ 2 = 1 / 2 - sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n / 4 := by
rw [sin_sq_pi_over_two_pow, sqrtTwoAddSeries, div_pow, sq_sqrt, add_div, ← sub_sub]
· congr
· norm_num
· norm_num
· exact add_nonneg two_pos.le (sqrtTwoAddSeries_zero_nonneg _)
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_over_two_pow_succ (n : ℕ) :
sin (π / 2 ^ (n + 2)) = √(2 - sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n) / 2 := by
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq two_ne_zero, eq_comm, sqrt_eq_iff_eq_sq, mul_pow,
sin_sq_pi_over_two_pow_succ, sub_mul]
· congr <;> norm_num
· rw [sub_nonneg]
exact (sqrtTwoAddSeries_lt_two _).le
refine mul_nonneg (sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi ?_ ?_) zero_le_two
· positivity
· exact div_le_self pi_pos.le <| one_le_pow₀ one_le_two
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_four : cos (π / 4) = √2 / 2 := by
trans cos (π / 2 ^ 2)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_four : sin (π / 4) = √2 / 2 := by
trans sin (π / 2 ^ 2)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_eight : cos (π / 8) = √(2 + √2) / 2 := by
trans cos (π / 2 ^ 3)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_eight : sin (π / 8) = √(2 - √2) / 2 := by
trans sin (π / 2 ^ 3)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_sixteen : cos (π / 16) = √(2 + √(2 + √2)) / 2 := by
trans cos (π / 2 ^ 4)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_sixteen : sin (π / 16) = √(2 - √(2 + √2)) / 2 := by
trans sin (π / 2 ^ 4)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_thirty_two : cos (π / 32) = √(2 + √(2 + √(2 + √2))) / 2 := by
trans cos (π / 2 ^ 5)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_thirty_two : sin (π / 32) = √(2 - √(2 + √(2 + √2))) / 2 := by
trans sin (π / 2 ^ 5)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
-- This section is also a convenient location for other explicit values of `sin` and `cos`.
/-- The cosine of `π / 3` is `1 / 2`. -/
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_three : cos (π / 3) = 1 / 2 := by
have h₁ : (2 * cos (π / 3) - 1) ^ 2 * (2 * cos (π / 3) + 2) = 0 := by
have : cos (3 * (π / 3)) = cos π := by
congr 1
ring
linarith [cos_pi, cos_three_mul (π / 3)]
rcases mul_eq_zero.mp h₁ with h | h
· linarith [pow_eq_zero h]
· have : cos π < cos (π / 3) := by
refine cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi ?_ le_rfl ?_ <;> linarith [pi_pos]
linarith [cos_pi]
/-- The cosine of `π / 6` is `√3 / 2`. -/
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_six : cos (π / 6) = √3 / 2 := by
rw [show (6 : ℝ) = 3 * 2 by norm_num, div_mul_eq_div_div, cos_half, cos_pi_div_three, one_add_div,
← div_mul_eq_div_div, two_add_one_eq_three, sqrt_div, sqrt_mul_self] <;> linarith [pi_pos]
/-- The square of the cosine of `π / 6` is `3 / 4` (this is sometimes more convenient than the
result for cosine itself). -/
theorem sq_cos_pi_div_six : cos (π / 6) ^ 2 = 3 / 4 := by
rw [cos_pi_div_six, div_pow, sq_sqrt] <;> norm_num
/-- The sine of `π / 6` is `1 / 2`. -/
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_six : sin (π / 6) = 1 / 2 := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_three]
congr
ring
/-- The square of the sine of `π / 3` is `3 / 4` (this is sometimes more convenient than the
result for cosine itself). -/
theorem sq_sin_pi_div_three : sin (π / 3) ^ 2 = 3 / 4 := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← sq_cos_pi_div_six]
congr
ring
/-- The sine of `π / 3` is `√3 / 2`. -/
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_three : sin (π / 3) = √3 / 2 := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_six]
congr
ring
theorem quadratic_root_cos_pi_div_five :
letI c := cos (π / 5)
4 * c ^ 2 - 2 * c - 1 = 0 := by
set θ := π / 5 with hθ
set c := cos θ
set s := sin θ
suffices 2 * c = 4 * c ^ 2 - 1 by simp [this]
have hs : s ≠ 0 := by
rw [ne_eq, sin_eq_zero_iff, hθ]
push_neg
intro n hn
replace hn : n * 5 = 1 := by field_simp [mul_comm _ π, mul_assoc] at hn; norm_cast at hn
omega
suffices s * (2 * c) = s * (4 * c ^ 2 - 1) from mul_left_cancel₀ hs this
calc s * (2 * c) = 2 * s * c := by rw [← mul_assoc, mul_comm 2]
_ = sin (2 * θ) := by rw [sin_two_mul]
_ = sin (π - 2 * θ) := by rw [sin_pi_sub]
_ = sin (2 * θ + θ) := by congr; field_simp [hθ]; linarith
_ = sin (2 * θ) * c + cos (2 * θ) * s := sin_add (2 * θ) θ
_ = 2 * s * c * c + cos (2 * θ) * s := by rw [sin_two_mul]
_ = 2 * s * c * c + (2 * c ^ 2 - 1) * s := by rw [cos_two_mul]
_ = s * (2 * c * c) + s * (2 * c ^ 2 - 1) := by linarith
_ = s * (4 * c ^ 2 - 1) := by linarith
open Polynomial in
theorem Polynomial.isRoot_cos_pi_div_five :
(4 • X ^ 2 - 2 • X - C 1 : ℝ[X]).IsRoot (cos (π / 5)) := by
simpa using quadratic_root_cos_pi_div_five
/-- The cosine of `π / 5` is `(1 + √5) / 4`. -/
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_five : cos (π / 5) = (1 + √5) / 4 := by
set c := cos (π / 5)
have : 4 * (c * c) + (-2) * c + (-1) = 0 := by
rw [← sq, neg_mul, ← sub_eq_add_neg, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
exact quadratic_root_cos_pi_div_five
have hd : discrim 4 (-2) (-1) = (2 * √5) * (2 * √5) := by norm_num [discrim, mul_mul_mul_comm]
rcases (quadratic_eq_zero_iff (by norm_num) hd c).mp this with h | h
· field_simp [h]; linarith
· absurd (show 0 ≤ c from cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc <| by constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos.le])
rw [not_le, h]
exact div_neg_of_neg_of_pos (by norm_num [lt_sqrt]) (by positivity)
end CosDivSq
/-- `Real.sin` as an `OrderIso` between `[-(π / 2), π / 2]` and `[-1, 1]`. -/
def sinOrderIso : Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) ≃o Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1 :=
(strictMonoOn_sin.orderIso _ _).trans <| OrderIso.setCongr _ _ bijOn_sin.image_eq
@[simp]
theorem coe_sinOrderIso_apply (x : Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : (sinOrderIso x : ℝ) = sin x :=
rfl
theorem sinOrderIso_apply (x : Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : sinOrderIso x = ⟨sin x, sin_mem_Icc x⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tan_pi_div_four : tan (π / 4) = 1 := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, cos_pi_div_four, sin_pi_div_four]
have h : √2 / 2 > 0 := by positivity
exact div_self (ne_of_gt h)
@[simp]
theorem tan_pi_div_two : tan (π / 2) = 0 := by simp [tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
@[simp]
theorem tan_pi_div_six : tan (π / 6) = 1 / sqrt 3 := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, sin_pi_div_six, cos_pi_div_six]
ring
@[simp]
theorem tan_pi_div_three : tan (π / 3) = sqrt 3 := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, sin_pi_div_three, cos_pi_div_three]
ring
theorem tan_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 < x) (hxp : x < π / 2) : 0 < tan x := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
exact div_pos (sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h0x (by linarith)) (cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨by linarith, hxp⟩)
theorem tan_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 ≤ x) (hxp : x ≤ π / 2) : 0 ≤ tan x :=
match lt_or_eq_of_le h0x, lt_or_eq_of_le hxp with
| Or.inl hx0, Or.inl hxp => le_of_lt (tan_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi_div_two hx0 hxp)
| Or.inl _, Or.inr hxp => by simp [hxp, tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
| Or.inr hx0, _ => by simp [hx0.symm]
theorem tan_neg_of_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x < 0) (hpx : -(π / 2) < x) : tan x < 0 :=
neg_pos.1 (tan_neg x ▸ tan_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi_div_two (by linarith) (by linarith [pi_pos]))
theorem tan_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_neg_pi_div_two_le {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x ≤ 0) (hpx : -(π / 2) ≤ x) :
tan x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 (tan_neg x ▸ tan_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two (by linarith) (by linarith))
theorem strictMonoOn_tan : StrictMonoOn tan (Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) := by
rintro x hx y hy hlt
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, tan_eq_sin_div_cos,
div_lt_div_iff₀ (cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo hx) (cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo hy), mul_comm, ← sub_pos, ← sin_sub]
exact sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi (sub_pos.2 hlt) <| by linarith [hx.1, hy.2]
theorem tan_lt_tan_of_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) < x) (hy₂ : y < π / 2)
(hxy : x < y) : tan x < tan y :=
strictMonoOn_tan ⟨hx₁, hxy.trans hy₂⟩ ⟨hx₁.trans hxy, hy₂⟩ hxy
theorem tan_lt_tan_of_nonneg_of_lt_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y < π / 2)
(hxy : x < y) : tan x < tan y :=
tan_lt_tan_of_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two (by linarith) hy₂ hxy
theorem injOn_tan : InjOn tan (Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :=
strictMonoOn_tan.injOn
theorem tan_inj_of_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) < x) (hx₂ : x < π / 2)
(hy₁ : -(π / 2) < y) (hy₂ : y < π / 2) (hxy : tan x = tan y) : x = y :=
injOn_tan ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩ hxy
theorem tan_periodic : Function.Periodic tan π := by
simpa only [Function.Periodic, tan_eq_sin_div_cos] using sin_antiperiodic.div cos_antiperiodic
@[simp]
theorem tan_pi : tan π = 0 := by rw [tan_periodic.eq, tan_zero]
theorem tan_add_pi (x : ℝ) : tan (x + π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic x
theorem tan_sub_pi (x : ℝ) : tan (x - π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic.sub_eq x
theorem tan_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : tan (π - x) = -tan x :=
tan_neg x ▸ tan_periodic.sub_eq'
theorem tan_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℝ) : tan (π / 2 - x) = (tan x)⁻¹ := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, tan_eq_sin_div_cos, inv_div, sin_pi_div_two_sub, cos_pi_div_two_sub]
theorem tan_nat_mul_pi (n : ℕ) : tan (n * π) = 0 :=
tan_zero ▸ tan_periodic.nat_mul_eq n
theorem tan_int_mul_pi (n : ℤ) : tan (n * π) = 0 :=
tan_zero ▸ tan_periodic.int_mul_eq n
theorem tan_add_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : tan (x + n * π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic.nat_mul n x
theorem tan_add_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : tan (x + n * π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic.int_mul n x
theorem tan_sub_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : tan (x - n * π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
theorem tan_sub_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : tan (x - n * π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
theorem tan_nat_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : tan (n * π - x) = -tan x :=
tan_neg x ▸ tan_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
theorem tan_int_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : tan (n * π - x) = -tan x :=
tan_neg x ▸ tan_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem tendsto_sin_pi_div_two : Tendsto sin (𝓝[<] (π / 2)) (𝓝 1) := by
convert continuous_sin.continuousWithinAt.tendsto
simp
theorem tendsto_cos_pi_div_two : Tendsto cos (𝓝[<] (π / 2)) (𝓝[>] 0) := by
apply tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within
· convert continuous_cos.continuousWithinAt.tendsto
simp
· filter_upwards [Ioo_mem_nhdsLT (neg_lt_self pi_div_two_pos)] with x hx
exact cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo hx
theorem tendsto_tan_pi_div_two : Tendsto tan (𝓝[<] (π / 2)) atTop := by
convert tendsto_cos_pi_div_two.inv_tendsto_nhdsGT_zero.atTop_mul_pos zero_lt_one
tendsto_sin_pi_div_two using 1
simp only [Pi.inv_apply, ← div_eq_inv_mul, ← tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
theorem tendsto_sin_neg_pi_div_two : Tendsto sin (𝓝[>] (-(π / 2))) (𝓝 (-1)) := by
convert continuous_sin.continuousWithinAt.tendsto using 2
simp
theorem tendsto_cos_neg_pi_div_two : Tendsto cos (𝓝[>] (-(π / 2))) (𝓝[>] 0) := by
apply tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within
· convert continuous_cos.continuousWithinAt.tendsto
simp
· filter_upwards [Ioo_mem_nhdsGT (neg_lt_self pi_div_two_pos)] with x hx
exact cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo hx
theorem tendsto_tan_neg_pi_div_two : Tendsto tan (𝓝[>] (-(π / 2))) atBot := by
convert tendsto_cos_neg_pi_div_two.inv_tendsto_nhdsGT_zero.atTop_mul_neg (by norm_num)
tendsto_sin_neg_pi_div_two using 1
simp only [Pi.inv_apply, ← div_eq_inv_mul, ← tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
end Real
namespace Complex
open Real
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq {z : ℂ} : sin z = 0 ↔ cos z = 1 ∨ cos z = -1 := by
rw [← mul_self_eq_one_iff, ← sin_sq_add_cos_sq, sq, sq, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add, sub_self]
exact ⟨fun h => by rw [h, mul_zero], eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero ∘ Eq.symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_two : cos (π / 2) = 0 :=
| calc
cos (π / 2) = Real.cos (π / 2) := by rw [ofReal_cos]; simp
_ = 0 := by simp
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Basic.lean | 993 | 997 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Expect
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Canonical
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Nonneg.Floor
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Data.NNReal.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Group
/-!
# Basic results on nonnegative real numbers
This file contains all results on `NNReal` that do not directly follow from its basic structure.
As a consequence, it is a bit of a random collection of results, and is a good target for cleanup.
## Notations
This file uses `ℝ≥0` as a localized notation for `NNReal`.
-/
assert_not_exists Star
open Function
open scoped BigOperators
namespace NNReal
noncomputable instance : FloorSemiring ℝ≥0 := Nonneg.floorSemiring
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_indicator {α} (s : Set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0) (a : α) :
((s.indicator f a : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = s.indicator (fun x => ↑(f x)) a :=
(toRealHom : ℝ≥0 →+ ℝ).map_indicator _ _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_list_sum (l : List ℝ≥0) : ((l.sum : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (l.map (↑)).sum :=
map_list_sum toRealHom l
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_list_prod (l : List ℝ≥0) : ((l.prod : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (l.map (↑)).prod :=
map_list_prod toRealHom l
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_multiset_sum (s : Multiset ℝ≥0) : ((s.sum : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (s.map (↑)).sum :=
map_multiset_sum toRealHom s
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_multiset_prod (s : Multiset ℝ≥0) : ((s.prod : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (s.map (↑)).prod :=
map_multiset_prod toRealHom s
variable {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → ℝ}
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sum (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) : ∑ i ∈ s, f i = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i : ℝ) :=
map_sum toRealHom _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma coe_expect (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) : 𝔼 i ∈ s, f i = 𝔼 i ∈ s, (f i : ℝ) :=
map_expect toRealHom ..
theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_sum_of_nonneg (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ f i) :
Real.toNNReal (∑ a ∈ s, f a) = ∑ a ∈ s, Real.toNNReal (f a) := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_sum, Real.coe_toNNReal _ (Finset.sum_nonneg hf)]
exact Finset.sum_congr rfl fun x hxs => by rw [Real.coe_toNNReal _ (hf x hxs)]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_prod (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) : ↑(∏ a ∈ s, f a) = ∏ a ∈ s, (f a : ℝ) :=
map_prod toRealHom _ _
theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_prod_of_nonneg (hf : ∀ a, a ∈ s → 0 ≤ f a) :
Real.toNNReal (∏ a ∈ s, f a) = ∏ a ∈ s, Real.toNNReal (f a) := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_prod, Real.coe_toNNReal _ (Finset.prod_nonneg hf)]
exact Finset.prod_congr rfl fun x hxs => by rw [Real.coe_toNNReal _ (hf x hxs)]
theorem le_iInf_add_iInf {ι ι' : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] [Nonempty ι'] {f : ι → ℝ≥0} {g : ι' → ℝ≥0}
{a : ℝ≥0} (h : ∀ i j, a ≤ f i + g j) : a ≤ (⨅ i, f i) + ⨅ j, g j := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.coe_add, coe_iInf, coe_iInf]
exact le_ciInf_add_ciInf h
theorem mul_finset_sup {α} (r : ℝ≥0) (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ≥0) :
r * s.sup f = s.sup fun a => r * f a :=
Finset.comp_sup_eq_sup_comp _ (NNReal.mul_sup r) (mul_zero r)
theorem finset_sup_mul {α} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ≥0) :
s.sup f * r = s.sup fun a => f a * r :=
Finset.comp_sup_eq_sup_comp (· * r) (fun x y => NNReal.sup_mul x y r) (zero_mul r)
theorem finset_sup_div {α} {f : α → ℝ≥0} {s : Finset α} (r : ℝ≥0) :
s.sup f / r = s.sup fun a => f a / r := by simp only [div_eq_inv_mul, mul_finset_sup]
open Real
section Sub
/-!
### Lemmas about subtraction
In this section we provide a few lemmas about subtraction that do not fit well into any other
typeclass. For lemmas about subtraction and addition see lemmas about `OrderedSub` in the file
`Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Sub.Basic`. See also `mul_tsub` and `tsub_mul`.
-/
theorem sub_div (a b c : ℝ≥0) : (a - b) / c = a / c - b / c :=
tsub_div _ _ _
end Sub
section Csupr
open Set
variable {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → ℝ≥0}
theorem iInf_mul (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : iInf f * a = ⨅ i, f i * a := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_mul, coe_iInf, coe_iInf]
exact Real.iInf_mul_of_nonneg (NNReal.coe_nonneg _) _
theorem mul_iInf (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : a * iInf f = ⨅ i, a * f i := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using iInf_mul f a
theorem mul_iSup (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : (a * ⨆ i, f i) = ⨆ i, a * f i := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_mul, NNReal.coe_iSup, NNReal.coe_iSup]
exact Real.mul_iSup_of_nonneg (NNReal.coe_nonneg _) _
theorem iSup_mul (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : (⨆ i, f i) * a = ⨆ i, f i * a := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_iSup]
simp_rw [mul_comm]
theorem iSup_div (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : (⨆ i, f i) / a = ⨆ i, f i / a := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, iSup_mul]
theorem mul_iSup_le {a : ℝ≥0} {g : ℝ≥0} {h : ι → ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ j, g * h j ≤ a) : g * iSup h ≤ a := by
rw [mul_iSup]
exact ciSup_le' H
theorem iSup_mul_le {a : ℝ≥0} {g : ι → ℝ≥0} {h : ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ i, g i * h ≤ a) : iSup g * h ≤ a := by
rw [iSup_mul]
exact ciSup_le' H
theorem iSup_mul_iSup_le {a : ℝ≥0} {g h : ι → ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ i j, g i * h j ≤ a) :
iSup g * iSup h ≤ a :=
iSup_mul_le fun _ => mul_iSup_le <| H _
variable [Nonempty ι]
theorem le_mul_iInf {a : ℝ≥0} {g : ℝ≥0} {h : ι → ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ j, a ≤ g * h j) : a ≤ g * iInf h := by
rw [mul_iInf]
exact le_ciInf H
theorem le_iInf_mul {a : ℝ≥0} {g : ι → ℝ≥0} {h : ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ i, a ≤ g i * h) : a ≤ iInf g * h := by
rw [iInf_mul]
exact le_ciInf H
theorem le_iInf_mul_iInf {a : ℝ≥0} {g h : ι → ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ i j, a ≤ g i * h j) :
a ≤ iInf g * iInf h :=
le_iInf_mul fun i => le_mul_iInf <| H i
end Csupr
end NNReal
| Mathlib/Data/NNReal/Basic.lean | 756 | 758 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Aaron Anderson, Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Kevin Buzzard, Yaël Dillies, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Lattice.Union
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sigma
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.CompleteLatticeIntervals
/-!
# Supremum independence
In this file, we define supremum independence of indexed sets. An indexed family `f : ι → α` is
sup-independent if, for all `a`, `f a` and the supremum of the rest are disjoint.
## Main definitions
* `Finset.SupIndep s f`: a family of elements `f` are supremum independent on the finite set `s`.
* `sSupIndep s`: a set of elements are supremum independent.
* `iSupIndep f`: a family of elements are supremum independent.
## Main statements
* In a distributive lattice, supremum independence is equivalent to pairwise disjointness:
* `Finset.supIndep_iff_pairwiseDisjoint`
* `CompleteLattice.sSupIndep_iff_pairwiseDisjoint`
* `CompleteLattice.iSupIndep_iff_pairwiseDisjoint`
* Otherwise, supremum independence is stronger than pairwise disjointness:
* `Finset.SupIndep.pairwiseDisjoint`
* `sSupIndep.pairwiseDisjoint`
* `iSupIndep.pairwiseDisjoint`
## Implementation notes
For the finite version, we avoid the "obvious" definition
`∀ i ∈ s, Disjoint (f i) ((s.erase i).sup f)` because `erase` would require decidable equality on
`ι`.
-/
variable {α β ι ι' : Type*}
/-! ### On lattices with a bottom element, via `Finset.sup` -/
namespace Finset
section Lattice
variable [Lattice α] [OrderBot α]
/-- Supremum independence of finite sets. We avoid the "obvious" definition using `s.erase i`
because `erase` would require decidable equality on `ι`. -/
def SupIndep (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃t⦄, t ⊆ s → ∀ ⦃i⦄, i ∈ s → i ∉ t → Disjoint (f i) (t.sup f)
variable {s t : Finset ι} {f : ι → α} {i : ι}
/-- The RHS looks like the definition of `iSupIndep`. -/
theorem supIndep_iff_disjoint_erase [DecidableEq ι] :
s.SupIndep f ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, Disjoint (f i) ((s.erase i).sup f) :=
⟨fun hs _ hi => hs (erase_subset _ _) hi (not_mem_erase _ _), fun hs _ ht i hi hit =>
(hs i hi).mono_right (sup_mono fun _ hj => mem_erase.2 ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hj hit, ht hj⟩)⟩
/-- If both the index type and the lattice have decidable equality,
then the `SupIndep` predicate is decidable.
TODO: speedup the definition and drop the `[DecidableEq ι]` assumption
by iterating over the pairs `(a, t)` such that `s = Finset.cons a t _`
using something like `List.eraseIdx`
or by generating both `f i` and `(s.erase i).sup f` in one loop over `s`.
Yet another possible optimization is to precompute partial suprema of `f`
over the inits and tails of the list representing `s`,
store them in 2 `Array`s,
then compute each `sup` in 1 operation. -/
instance [DecidableEq ι] [DecidableEq α] : Decidable (SupIndep s f) :=
have : ∀ i, Decidable (Disjoint (f i) ((s.erase i).sup f)) := fun _ ↦
decidable_of_iff _ disjoint_iff.symm
decidable_of_iff _ supIndep_iff_disjoint_erase.symm
theorem SupIndep.subset (ht : t.SupIndep f) (h : s ⊆ t) : s.SupIndep f := fun _ hu _ hi =>
ht (hu.trans h) (h hi)
@[simp]
theorem supIndep_empty (f : ι → α) : (∅ : Finset ι).SupIndep f := fun _ _ a ha =>
(not_mem_empty a ha).elim
@[simp]
theorem supIndep_singleton (i : ι) (f : ι → α) : ({i} : Finset ι).SupIndep f :=
fun s hs j hji hj => by
rw [eq_empty_of_ssubset_singleton ⟨hs, fun h => hj (h hji)⟩, sup_empty]
exact disjoint_bot_right
theorem SupIndep.pairwiseDisjoint (hs : s.SupIndep f) : (s : Set ι).PairwiseDisjoint f :=
fun _ ha _ hb hab =>
sup_singleton.subst <| hs (singleton_subset_iff.2 hb) ha <| not_mem_singleton.2 hab
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias sup_indep.pairwise_disjoint := SupIndep.pairwiseDisjoint
theorem SupIndep.le_sup_iff (hs : s.SupIndep f) (hts : t ⊆ s) (hi : i ∈ s) (hf : ∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥) :
f i ≤ t.sup f ↔ i ∈ t := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, le_sup⟩
by_contra hit
exact hf i (disjoint_self.1 <| (hs hts hi hit).mono_right h)
theorem SupIndep.antitone_fun {g : ι → α} (hle : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≤ g x) (h : s.SupIndep g) :
s.SupIndep f := fun _t hts i his hit ↦
(h hts his hit).mono (hle i his) <| Finset.sup_mono_fun fun x hx ↦ hle x <| hts hx
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")]
alias supIndep_antimono_fun := SupIndep.antitone_fun
protected theorem SupIndep.image [DecidableEq ι] {s : Finset ι'} {g : ι' → ι}
(hs : s.SupIndep (f ∘ g)) : (s.image g).SupIndep f := by
intro t ht i hi hit
rcases subset_image_iff.mp ht with ⟨t, hts, rfl⟩
| rcases mem_image.mp hi with ⟨i, his, rfl⟩
rw [sup_image]
exact hs hts his (hit <| mem_image_of_mem _ ·)
theorem supIndep_map {s : Finset ι'} {g : ι' ↪ ι} : (s.map g).SupIndep f ↔ s.SupIndep (f ∘ g) := by
refine ⟨fun hs t ht i hi hit => ?_, fun hs => ?_⟩
· rw [← sup_map]
| Mathlib/Order/SupIndep.lean | 120 | 126 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.WithTop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
import Mathlib.Tactic.FastInstance
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
This file defines `Polynomial R`, the type of univariate polynomials over the semiring `R`, builds
a semiring structure on it, and gives basic definitions that are expanded in other files in this
directory.
## Main definitions
* `monomial n a` is the polynomial `a X^n`. Note that `monomial n` is defined as an `R`-linear map.
* `C a` is the constant polynomial `a`. Note that `C` is defined as a ring homomorphism.
* `X` is the polynomial `X`, i.e., `monomial 1 1`.
* `p.sum f` is `∑ n ∈ p.support, f n (p.coeff n)`, i.e., one sums the values of functions applied
to coefficients of the polynomial `p`.
* `p.erase n` is the polynomial `p` in which one removes the `c X^n` term.
There are often two natural variants of lemmas involving sums, depending on whether one acts on the
polynomials, or on the function. The naming convention is that one adds `index` when acting on
the polynomials. For instance,
* `sum_add_index` states that `(p + q).sum f = p.sum f + q.sum f`;
* `sum_add` states that `p.sum (fun n x ↦ f n x + g n x) = p.sum f + p.sum g`.
* Notation to refer to `Polynomial R`, as `R[X]` or `R[t]`.
## Implementation
Polynomials are defined using `R[ℕ]`, where `R` is a semiring.
The variable `X` commutes with every polynomial `p`: lemma `X_mul` proves the identity
`X * p = p * X`. The relationship to `R[ℕ]` is through a structure
to make polynomials irreducible from the point of view of the kernel. Most operations
are irreducible since Lean can not compute anyway with `AddMonoidAlgebra`. There are two
exceptions that we make semireducible:
* The zero polynomial, so that its coefficients are definitionally equal to `0`.
* The scalar action, to permit typeclass search to unfold it to resolve potential instance
diamonds.
The raw implementation of the equivalence between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]` is
done through `ofFinsupp` and `toFinsupp` (or, equivalently, `rcases p` when `p` is a polynomial
gives an element `q` of `R[ℕ]`, and conversely `⟨q⟩` gives back `p`). The
equivalence is also registered as a ring equiv in `Polynomial.toFinsuppIso`. These should
in general not be used once the basic API for polynomials is constructed.
-/
noncomputable section
/-- `Polynomial R` is the type of univariate polynomials over `R`,
denoted as `R[X]` within the `Polynomial` namespace.
Polynomials should be seen as (semi-)rings with the additional constructor `X`.
The embedding from `R` is called `C`. -/
structure Polynomial (R : Type*) [Semiring R] where ofFinsupp ::
toFinsupp : AddMonoidAlgebra R ℕ
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Polynomial] notation:9000 R "[X]" => Polynomial R
open AddMonoidAlgebra Finset
open Finsupp hiding single
open Function hiding Commute
namespace Polynomial
universe u
variable {R : Type u} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem forall_iff_forall_finsupp (P : R[X] → Prop) :
(∀ p, P p) ↔ ∀ q : R[ℕ], P ⟨q⟩ :=
⟨fun h q => h ⟨q⟩, fun h ⟨p⟩ => h p⟩
theorem exists_iff_exists_finsupp (P : R[X] → Prop) :
(∃ p, P p) ↔ ∃ q : R[ℕ], P ⟨q⟩ :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨p⟩, hp⟩ => ⟨p, hp⟩, fun ⟨q, hq⟩ => ⟨⟨q⟩, hq⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem eta (f : R[X]) : Polynomial.ofFinsupp f.toFinsupp = f := by cases f; rfl
/-! ### Conversions to and from `AddMonoidAlgebra`
Since `R[X]` is not defeq to `R[ℕ]`, but instead is a structure wrapping
it, we have to copy across all the arithmetic operators manually, along with the lemmas about how
they unfold around `Polynomial.ofFinsupp` and `Polynomial.toFinsupp`.
-/
section AddMonoidAlgebra
private irreducible_def add : R[X] → R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a + b⟩
private irreducible_def neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] : R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨-a⟩
private irreducible_def mul : R[X] → R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a * b⟩
instance zero : Zero R[X] :=
⟨⟨0⟩⟩
instance one : One R[X] :=
⟨⟨1⟩⟩
instance add' : Add R[X] :=
⟨add⟩
instance neg' {R : Type u} [Ring R] : Neg R[X] :=
⟨neg⟩
instance sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] : Sub R[X] :=
⟨fun a b => a + -b⟩
instance mul' : Mul R[X] :=
⟨mul⟩
-- If the private definitions are accidentally exposed, simplify them away.
@[simp] theorem add_eq_add : add p q = p + q := rfl
@[simp] theorem mul_eq_mul : mul p q = p * q := rfl
instance instNSMul : SMul ℕ R[X] where
smul r p := ⟨r • p.toFinsupp⟩
instance smulZeroClass {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] : SMulZeroClass S R[X] where
smul r p := ⟨r • p.toFinsupp⟩
smul_zero a := congr_arg ofFinsupp (smul_zero a)
instance {S : Type*} [Zero S] [SMulZeroClass S R] [NoZeroSMulDivisors S R] :
NoZeroSMulDivisors S R[X] where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero eq :=
(eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero <| congr_arg toFinsupp eq).imp id (congr_arg ofFinsupp)
-- to avoid a bug in the `ring` tactic
instance (priority := 1) pow : Pow R[X] ℕ where pow p n := npowRec n p
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_zero : (⟨0⟩ : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_one : (⟨1⟩ : R[X]) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_add {a b} : (⟨a + b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ + ⟨b⟩ :=
show _ = add _ _ by rw [add_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] {a} : (⟨-a⟩ : R[X]) = -⟨a⟩ :=
show _ = neg _ by rw [neg_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] {a b} : (⟨a - b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ - ⟨b⟩ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ofFinsupp_add, ofFinsupp_neg]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_mul (a b) : (⟨a * b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ * ⟨b⟩ :=
show _ = mul _ _ by rw [mul_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_nsmul (a : ℕ) (b) :
(⟨a • b⟩ : R[X]) = (a • ⟨b⟩ : R[X]) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_smul {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (b) :
(⟨a • b⟩ : R[X]) = (a • ⟨b⟩ : R[X]) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_pow (a) (n : ℕ) : (⟨a ^ n⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ ^ n := by
change _ = npowRec n _
induction n with
| zero => simp [npowRec]
| succ n n_ih => simp [npowRec, n_ih, pow_succ]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_zero : (0 : R[X]).toFinsupp = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_one : (1 : R[X]).toFinsupp = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_add (a b : R[X]) : (a + b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp + b.toFinsupp := by
cases a
cases b
rw [← ofFinsupp_add]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] (a : R[X]) : (-a).toFinsupp = -a.toFinsupp := by
cases a
rw [← ofFinsupp_neg]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] (a b : R[X]) :
(a - b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp - b.toFinsupp := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← toFinsupp_neg, ← toFinsupp_add]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_mul (a b : R[X]) : (a * b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp * b.toFinsupp := by
cases a
cases b
rw [← ofFinsupp_mul]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_nsmul (a : ℕ) (b : R[X]) :
(a • b).toFinsupp = a • b.toFinsupp :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_smul {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (b : R[X]) :
(a • b).toFinsupp = a • b.toFinsupp :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_pow (a : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : (a ^ n).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp ^ n := by
cases a
rw [← ofFinsupp_pow]
theorem _root_.IsSMulRegular.polynomial {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] {a : S}
(ha : IsSMulRegular R a) : IsSMulRegular R[X] a
| ⟨_x⟩, ⟨_y⟩, h => congr_arg _ <| ha.finsupp (Polynomial.ofFinsupp.inj h)
theorem toFinsupp_injective : Function.Injective (toFinsupp : R[X] → AddMonoidAlgebra _ _) :=
fun ⟨_x⟩ ⟨_y⟩ => congr_arg _
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_inj {a b : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = b.toFinsupp ↔ a = b :=
toFinsupp_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_eq_zero {a : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_zero, toFinsupp_inj]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_eq_one {a : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_one, toFinsupp_inj]
/-- A more convenient spelling of `Polynomial.ofFinsupp.injEq` in terms of `Iff`. -/
theorem ofFinsupp_inj {a b} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨b⟩ ↔ a = b :=
iff_of_eq (ofFinsupp.injEq _ _)
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_eq_zero {a} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← ofFinsupp_zero, ofFinsupp_inj]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_eq_one {a} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by rw [← ofFinsupp_one, ofFinsupp_inj]
instance inhabited : Inhabited R[X] :=
⟨0⟩
instance instNatCast : NatCast R[X] where natCast n := ofFinsupp n
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_natCast (n : ℕ) : (⟨n⟩ : R[X]) = n := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_natCast (n : ℕ) : (n : R[X]).toFinsupp = n := rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (⟨ofNat(n)⟩ : R[X]) = ofNat(n) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : R[X]).toFinsupp = ofNat(n) := rfl
instance semiring : Semiring R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.semiring toFinsupp toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_zero
toFinsupp_one toFinsupp_add toFinsupp_mul (fun _ _ => toFinsupp_nsmul _ _) toFinsupp_pow
fun _ => rfl
instance distribSMul {S} [DistribSMul S R] : DistribSMul S R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.distribSMul ⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩
toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul
instance distribMulAction {S} [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] : DistribMulAction S R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.distribMulAction
⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero (R := R)⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩ toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul
instance faithfulSMul {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] [FaithfulSMul S R] : FaithfulSMul S R[X] where
eq_of_smul_eq_smul {_s₁ _s₂} h :=
eq_of_smul_eq_smul fun a : ℕ →₀ R => congr_arg toFinsupp (h ⟨a⟩)
instance module {S} [Semiring S] [Module S R] : Module S R[X] :=
fast_instance% Function.Injective.module _ ⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩
toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul
instance smulCommClass {S₁ S₂} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] [SMulZeroClass S₂ R] [SMulCommClass S₁ S₂ R] :
SMulCommClass S₁ S₂ R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro m n ⟨f⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_comm m n f]⟩
instance isScalarTower {S₁ S₂} [SMul S₁ S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] [SMulZeroClass S₂ R]
[IsScalarTower S₁ S₂ R] : IsScalarTower S₁ S₂ R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ _ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_assoc]⟩
instance isScalarTower_right {α K : Type*} [Semiring K] [DistribSMul α K] [IsScalarTower α K K] :
IsScalarTower α K[X] K[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [smul_eq_mul, ← ofFinsupp_smul, ← ofFinsupp_mul, ← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_mul_assoc]⟩
instance isCentralScalar {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] [SMulZeroClass Sᵐᵒᵖ R] [IsCentralScalar S R] :
IsCentralScalar S R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, op_smul_eq_smul]⟩
instance unique [Subsingleton R] : Unique R[X] :=
{ Polynomial.inhabited with
uniq := by
rintro ⟨x⟩
apply congr_arg ofFinsupp
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton] }
variable (R)
/-- Ring isomorphism between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]`. This is just an
implementation detail, but it can be useful to transfer results from `Finsupp` to polynomials. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def toFinsuppIso : R[X] ≃+* R[ℕ] where
toFun := toFinsupp
invFun := ofFinsupp
left_inv := fun ⟨_p⟩ => rfl
right_inv _p := rfl
map_mul' := toFinsupp_mul
map_add' := toFinsupp_add
instance [DecidableEq R] : DecidableEq R[X] :=
@Equiv.decidableEq R[X] _ (toFinsuppIso R).toEquiv (Finsupp.instDecidableEq)
/-- Linear isomorphism between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]`. This is just an
implementation detail, but it can be useful to transfer results from `Finsupp` to polynomials. -/
@[simps!]
def toFinsuppIsoLinear : R[X] ≃ₗ[R] R[ℕ] where
__ := toFinsuppIso R
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
end AddMonoidAlgebra
theorem ofFinsupp_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[ℕ]) :
(⟨∑ i ∈ s, f i⟩ : R[X]) = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟨f i⟩ :=
map_sum (toFinsuppIso R).symm f s
theorem toFinsupp_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i : R[X]).toFinsupp = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i).toFinsupp :=
map_sum (toFinsuppIso R) f s
/-- The set of all `n` such that `X^n` has a non-zero coefficient. -/
def support : R[X] → Finset ℕ
| ⟨p⟩ => p.support
@[simp]
theorem support_ofFinsupp (p) : support (⟨p⟩ : R[X]) = p.support := by rw [support]
theorem support_toFinsupp (p : R[X]) : p.toFinsupp.support = p.support := by rw [support]
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : (0 : R[X]).support = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty : p.support = ∅ ↔ p = 0 := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp [support]
@[simp] lemma support_nonempty : p.support.Nonempty ↔ p ≠ 0 :=
Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty.trans support_eq_empty.not
theorem card_support_eq_zero : #p.support = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by simp
/-- `monomial s a` is the monomial `a * X^s` -/
def monomial (n : ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] R[X] where
toFun t := ⟨Finsupp.single n t⟩
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10745): was `simp`.
map_add' x y := by simp; rw [ofFinsupp_add]
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10745): was `simp [← ofFinsupp_smul]`.
map_smul' r x := by simp; rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_single']
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_monomial (n : ℕ) (r : R) : (monomial n r).toFinsupp = Finsupp.single n r := by
simp [monomial]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_single (n : ℕ) (r : R) : (⟨Finsupp.single n r⟩ : R[X]) = monomial n r := by
simp [monomial]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero_right (n : ℕ) : monomial n (0 : R) = 0 :=
(monomial n).map_zero
-- This is not a `simp` lemma as `monomial_zero_left` is more general.
theorem monomial_zero_one : monomial 0 (1 : R) = 1 :=
rfl
-- TODO: can't we just delete this one?
theorem monomial_add (n : ℕ) (r s : R) : monomial n (r + s) = monomial n r + monomial n s :=
(monomial n).map_add _ _
theorem monomial_mul_monomial (n m : ℕ) (r s : R) :
monomial n r * monomial m s = monomial (n + m) (r * s) :=
toFinsupp_injective <| by
simp only [toFinsupp_monomial, toFinsupp_mul, AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_single]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_pow (n : ℕ) (r : R) (k : ℕ) : monomial n r ^ k = monomial (n * k) (r ^ k) := by
induction k with
| zero => simp [pow_zero, monomial_zero_one]
| succ k ih => simp [pow_succ, ih, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_add, add_comm]
theorem smul_monomial {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (n : ℕ) (b : R) :
a • monomial n b = monomial n (a • b) :=
toFinsupp_injective <| AddMonoidAlgebra.smul_single _ _ _
theorem monomial_injective (n : ℕ) : Function.Injective (monomial n : R → R[X]) :=
(toFinsuppIso R).symm.injective.comp (single_injective n)
@[simp]
theorem monomial_eq_zero_iff (t : R) (n : ℕ) : monomial n t = 0 ↔ t = 0 :=
LinearMap.map_eq_zero_iff _ (Polynomial.monomial_injective n)
theorem monomial_eq_monomial_iff {m n : ℕ} {a b : R} :
monomial m a = monomial n b ↔ m = n ∧ a = b ∨ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_inj, toFinsupp_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial, Finsupp.single_eq_single_iff]
theorem support_add : (p + q).support ⊆ p.support ∪ q.support := by
simpa [support] using Finsupp.support_add
/-- `C a` is the constant polynomial `a`.
`C` is provided as a ring homomorphism.
-/
def C : R →+* R[X] :=
{ monomial 0 with
map_one' := by simp [monomial_zero_one]
map_mul' := by simp [monomial_mul_monomial]
map_zero' := by simp }
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero_left (a : R) : monomial 0 a = C a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_C (a : R) : (C a).toFinsupp = single 0 a :=
rfl
theorem C_0 : C (0 : R) = 0 := by simp
theorem C_1 : C (1 : R) = 1 :=
rfl
theorem C_mul : C (a * b) = C a * C b :=
C.map_mul a b
theorem C_add : C (a + b) = C a + C b :=
C.map_add a b
@[simp]
theorem smul_C {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] (s : S) (r : R) : s • C r = C (s • r) :=
smul_monomial _ _ r
theorem C_pow : C (a ^ n) = C a ^ n :=
C.map_pow a n
theorem C_eq_natCast (n : ℕ) : C (n : R) = (n : R[X]) :=
map_natCast C n
@[simp]
theorem C_mul_monomial : C a * monomial n b = monomial n (a * b) := by
simp only [← monomial_zero_left, monomial_mul_monomial, zero_add]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_C : monomial n a * C b = monomial n (a * b) := by
simp only [← monomial_zero_left, monomial_mul_monomial, add_zero]
/-- `X` is the polynomial variable (aka indeterminate). -/
def X : R[X] :=
monomial 1 1
theorem monomial_one_one_eq_X : monomial 1 (1 : R) = X :=
rfl
theorem monomial_one_right_eq_X_pow (n : ℕ) : monomial n (1 : R) = X ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp [monomial_zero_one]
| succ n ih => rw [pow_succ, ← ih, ← monomial_one_one_eq_X, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_X : X.toFinsupp = Finsupp.single 1 (1 : R) :=
rfl
theorem X_ne_C [Nontrivial R] (a : R) : X ≠ C a := by
intro he
simpa using monomial_eq_monomial_iff.1 he
/-- `X` commutes with everything, even when the coefficients are noncommutative. -/
theorem X_mul : X * p = p * X := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp only [X, ← ofFinsupp_single, ← ofFinsupp_mul, LinearMap.coe_mk, ofFinsupp.injEq]
ext
simp [AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_apply, AddMonoidAlgebra.sum_single_index, add_comm]
theorem X_pow_mul {n : ℕ} : X ^ n * p = p * X ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
conv_lhs => rw [pow_succ]
rw [mul_assoc, X_mul, ← mul_assoc, ih, mul_assoc, ← pow_succ]
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `Polynomial.X_mul`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_mul_C (r : R) : X * C r = C r * X :=
X_mul
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X ^ n`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `X_pow_mul`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_C (r : R) (n : ℕ) : X ^ n * C r = C r * X ^ n :=
X_pow_mul
theorem X_pow_mul_assoc {n : ℕ} : p * X ^ n * q = p * q * X ^ n := by
rw [mul_assoc, X_pow_mul, ← mul_assoc]
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X ^ n`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `X_pow_mul_assoc`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_assoc_C {n : ℕ} (r : R) : p * X ^ n * C r = p * C r * X ^ n :=
X_pow_mul_assoc
theorem commute_X (p : R[X]) : Commute X p :=
X_mul
theorem commute_X_pow (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : Commute (X ^ n) p :=
X_pow_mul
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_X (n : ℕ) (r : R) : monomial n r * X = monomial (n + 1) r := by
rw [X, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (r : R) (k : ℕ) :
monomial n r * X ^ k = monomial (n + k) r := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih => simp [ih, pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, add_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem X_mul_monomial (n : ℕ) (r : R) : X * monomial n r = monomial (n + 1) r := by
rw [X_mul, monomial_mul_X]
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_monomial (k n : ℕ) (r : R) : X ^ k * monomial n r = monomial (n + k) r := by
rw [X_pow_mul, monomial_mul_X_pow]
/-- `coeff p n` (often denoted `p.coeff n`) is the coefficient of `X^n` in `p`. -/
def coeff : R[X] → ℕ → R
| ⟨p⟩ => p
@[simp]
theorem coeff_ofFinsupp (p) : coeff (⟨p⟩ : R[X]) = p := by rw [coeff]
theorem coeff_injective : Injective (coeff : R[X] → ℕ → R) := by
rintro ⟨p⟩ ⟨q⟩
simp only [coeff, DFunLike.coe_fn_eq, imp_self, ofFinsupp.injEq]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_inj : p.coeff = q.coeff ↔ p = q :=
coeff_injective.eq_iff
theorem toFinsupp_apply (f : R[X]) (i) : f.toFinsupp i = f.coeff i := by cases f; rfl
theorem coeff_monomial : coeff (monomial n a) m = if n = m then a else 0 := by
simp [coeff, Finsupp.single_apply]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_same (n : ℕ) (c : R) : (monomial n c).coeff n = c :=
Finsupp.single_eq_same
theorem coeff_monomial_of_ne {m n : ℕ} (c : R) (h : n ≠ m) : (monomial n c).coeff m = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_eq_of_ne h
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero (n : ℕ) : coeff (0 : R[X]) n = 0 :=
rfl
theorem coeff_one {n : ℕ} : coeff (1 : R[X]) n = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 := by
simp_rw [eq_comm (a := n) (b := 0)]
exact coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_one_zero : coeff (1 : R[X]) 0 = 1 := by
simp [coeff_one]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_one : coeff (X : R[X]) 1 = 1 :=
coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_zero : coeff (X : R[X]) 0 = 0 :=
coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_succ : coeff (monomial (n + 1) a) 0 = 0 := by simp [coeff_monomial]
theorem coeff_X : coeff (X : R[X]) n = if 1 = n then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_monomial
theorem coeff_X_of_ne_one {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 1) : coeff (X : R[X]) n = 0 := by
rw [coeff_X, if_neg hn.symm]
@[simp]
theorem mem_support_iff : n ∈ p.support ↔ p.coeff n ≠ 0 := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp
theorem not_mem_support_iff : n ∉ p.support ↔ p.coeff n = 0 := by simp
theorem coeff_C : coeff (C a) n = ite (n = 0) a 0 := by
convert coeff_monomial (a := a) (m := n) (n := 0) using 2
simp [eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C_zero : coeff (C a) 0 = a :=
coeff_monomial
theorem coeff_C_ne_zero (h : n ≠ 0) : (C a).coeff n = 0 := by rw [coeff_C, if_neg h]
@[simp]
lemma coeff_C_succ {r : R} {n : ℕ} : coeff (C r) (n + 1) = 0 := by simp [coeff_C]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_natCast_ite : (Nat.cast m : R[X]).coeff n = ite (n = 0) m 0 := by
simp only [← C_eq_natCast, coeff_C, Nat.cast_ite, Nat.cast_zero]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_ofNat_zero (a : ℕ) [a.AtLeastTwo] :
coeff (ofNat(a) : R[X]) 0 = ofNat(a) :=
coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_ofNat_succ (a n : ℕ) [h : a.AtLeastTwo] :
coeff (ofNat(a) : R[X]) (n + 1) = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_ofNat]
simp [-Nat.cast_ofNat]
theorem C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial : ∀ {n : ℕ}, C a * X ^ n = monomial n a
| 0 => mul_one _
| n + 1 => by
rw [pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, X, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
@[simp high]
theorem toFinsupp_C_mul_X_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) :
Polynomial.toFinsupp (C a * X ^ n) = Finsupp.single n a := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial]
theorem C_mul_X_eq_monomial : C a * X = monomial 1 a := by rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, pow_one]
@[simp high]
theorem toFinsupp_C_mul_X (a : R) : Polynomial.toFinsupp (C a * X) = Finsupp.single 1 a := by
rw [C_mul_X_eq_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial]
theorem C_injective : Injective (C : R → R[X]) :=
monomial_injective 0
@[simp]
theorem C_inj : C a = C b ↔ a = b :=
C_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem C_eq_zero : C a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
C_injective.eq_iff' (map_zero C)
theorem C_ne_zero : C a ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
C_eq_zero.not
theorem subsingleton_iff_subsingleton : Subsingleton R[X] ↔ Subsingleton R :=
⟨@Injective.subsingleton _ _ _ C_injective, by
intro
infer_instance⟩
theorem Nontrivial.of_polynomial_ne (h : p ≠ q) : Nontrivial R :=
(subsingleton_or_nontrivial R).resolve_left fun _hI => h <| Subsingleton.elim _ _
theorem forall_eq_iff_forall_eq : (∀ f g : R[X], f = g) ↔ ∀ a b : R, a = b := by
simpa only [← subsingleton_iff] using subsingleton_iff_subsingleton
theorem ext_iff {p q : R[X]} : p = q ↔ ∀ n, coeff p n = coeff q n := by
rcases p with ⟨f : ℕ →₀ R⟩
rcases q with ⟨g : ℕ →₀ R⟩
simpa [coeff] using DFunLike.ext_iff (f := f) (g := g)
@[ext]
theorem ext {p q : R[X]} : (∀ n, coeff p n = coeff q n) → p = q :=
ext_iff.2
/-- Monomials generate the additive monoid of polynomials. -/
theorem addSubmonoid_closure_setOf_eq_monomial :
AddSubmonoid.closure { p : R[X] | ∃ n a, p = monomial n a } = ⊤ := by
apply top_unique
rw [← AddSubmonoid.map_equiv_top (toFinsuppIso R).symm.toAddEquiv, ←
Finsupp.add_closure_setOf_eq_single, AddMonoidHom.map_mclosure]
refine AddSubmonoid.closure_mono (Set.image_subset_iff.2 ?_)
rintro _ ⟨n, a, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n, a, Polynomial.ofFinsupp_single _ _⟩
theorem addHom_ext {M : Type*} [AddZeroClass M] {f g : R[X] →+ M}
(h : ∀ n a, f (monomial n a) = g (monomial n a)) : f = g :=
AddMonoidHom.eq_of_eqOn_denseM addSubmonoid_closure_setOf_eq_monomial <| by
rintro p ⟨n, a, rfl⟩
exact h n a
@[ext high]
theorem addHom_ext' {M : Type*} [AddZeroClass M] {f g : R[X] →+ M}
(h : ∀ n, f.comp (monomial n).toAddMonoidHom = g.comp (monomial n).toAddMonoidHom) : f = g :=
addHom_ext fun n => DFunLike.congr_fun (h n)
@[ext high]
theorem lhom_ext' {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] {f g : R[X] →ₗ[R] M}
(h : ∀ n, f.comp (monomial n) = g.comp (monomial n)) : f = g :=
LinearMap.toAddMonoidHom_injective <| addHom_ext fun n => LinearMap.congr_fun (h n)
-- this has the same content as the subsingleton
theorem eq_zero_of_eq_zero (h : (0 : R) = (1 : R)) (p : R[X]) : p = 0 := by
rw [← one_smul R p, ← h, zero_smul]
section Fewnomials
theorem support_monomial (n) {a : R} (H : a ≠ 0) : (monomial n a).support = singleton n := by
rw [← ofFinsupp_single, support]; exact Finsupp.support_single_ne_zero _ H
theorem support_monomial' (n) (a : R) : (monomial n a).support ⊆ singleton n := by
rw [← ofFinsupp_single, support]
exact Finsupp.support_single_subset
theorem support_C {a : R} (h : a ≠ 0) : (C a).support = singleton 0 :=
support_monomial 0 h
theorem support_C_subset (a : R) : (C a).support ⊆ singleton 0 :=
support_monomial' 0 a
theorem support_C_mul_X {c : R} (h : c ≠ 0) : Polynomial.support (C c * X) = singleton 1 := by
rw [C_mul_X_eq_monomial, support_monomial 1 h]
theorem support_C_mul_X' (c : R) : Polynomial.support (C c * X) ⊆ singleton 1 := by
simpa only [C_mul_X_eq_monomial] using support_monomial' 1 c
theorem support_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) {c : R} (h : c ≠ 0) :
Polynomial.support (C c * X ^ n) = singleton n := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, support_monomial n h]
theorem support_C_mul_X_pow' (n : ℕ) (c : R) : Polynomial.support (C c * X ^ n) ⊆ singleton n := by
simpa only [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial] using support_monomial' n c
open Finset
theorem support_binomial' (k m : ℕ) (x y : R) :
Polynomial.support (C x * X ^ k + C y * X ^ m) ⊆ {k, m} :=
support_add.trans
(union_subset
((support_C_mul_X_pow' k x).trans (singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_self k {m})))
((support_C_mul_X_pow' m y).trans
(singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_singleton_self m)))))
theorem support_trinomial' (k m n : ℕ) (x y z : R) :
Polynomial.support (C x * X ^ k + C y * X ^ m + C z * X ^ n) ⊆ {k, m, n} :=
support_add.trans
(union_subset
(support_add.trans
(union_subset
((support_C_mul_X_pow' k x).trans (singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_self k {m, n})))
((support_C_mul_X_pow' m y).trans
(singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_insert_self m {n}))))))
((support_C_mul_X_pow' n z).trans
(singleton_subset_iff.mpr (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_insert_of_mem (mem_singleton_self n))))))
end Fewnomials
theorem X_pow_eq_monomial (n) : X ^ n = monomial n (1 : R) := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [pow_zero, monomial_zero_one]
| succ n hn => rw [pow_succ, hn, X, monomial_mul_monomial, one_mul]
@[simp high]
theorem toFinsupp_X_pow (n : ℕ) : (X ^ n).toFinsupp = Finsupp.single n (1 : R) := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, toFinsupp_monomial]
theorem smul_X_eq_monomial {n} : a • X ^ n = monomial n (a : R) := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, smul_monomial, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
theorem support_X_pow (H : ¬(1 : R) = 0) (n : ℕ) : (X ^ n : R[X]).support = singleton n := by
convert support_monomial n H
exact X_pow_eq_monomial n
theorem support_X_empty (H : (1 : R) = 0) : (X : R[X]).support = ∅ := by
rw [X, H, monomial_zero_right, support_zero]
theorem support_X (H : ¬(1 : R) = 0) : (X : R[X]).support = singleton 1 := by
rw [← pow_one X, support_X_pow H 1]
theorem monomial_left_inj {a : R} (ha : a ≠ 0) {i j : ℕ} :
monomial i a = monomial j a ↔ i = j := by
simp only [← ofFinsupp_single, ofFinsupp.injEq, Finsupp.single_left_inj ha]
theorem binomial_eq_binomial {k l m n : ℕ} {u v : R} (hu : u ≠ 0) (hv : v ≠ 0) :
C u * X ^ k + C v * X ^ l = C u * X ^ m + C v * X ^ n ↔
k = m ∧ l = n ∨ u = v ∧ k = n ∧ l = m ∨ u + v = 0 ∧ k = l ∧ m = n := by
simp_rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, ← toFinsupp_inj, toFinsupp_add, toFinsupp_monomial]
exact Finsupp.single_add_single_eq_single_add_single hu hv
theorem natCast_mul (n : ℕ) (p : R[X]) : (n : R[X]) * p = n • p :=
(nsmul_eq_mul _ _).symm
/-- Summing the values of a function applied to the coefficients of a polynomial -/
def sum {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (f : ℕ → R → S) : S :=
∑ n ∈ p.support, f n (p.coeff n)
theorem sum_def {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (f : ℕ → R → S) :
p.sum f = ∑ n ∈ p.support, f n (p.coeff n) :=
rfl
theorem sum_eq_of_subset {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] {p : R[X]} (f : ℕ → R → S)
(hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) {s : Finset ℕ} (hs : p.support ⊆ s) :
p.sum f = ∑ n ∈ s, f n (p.coeff n) :=
Finsupp.sum_of_support_subset _ hs f (fun i _ ↦ hf i)
/-- Expressing the product of two polynomials as a double sum. -/
theorem mul_eq_sum_sum :
p * q = ∑ i ∈ p.support, q.sum fun j a => (monomial (i + j)) (p.coeff i * a) := by
apply toFinsupp_injective
rcases p with ⟨⟩; rcases q with ⟨⟩
simp_rw [sum, coeff, toFinsupp_sum, support, toFinsupp_mul, toFinsupp_monomial,
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_def, Finsupp.sum]
@[simp]
theorem sum_zero_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (f : ℕ → R → S) : (0 : R[X]).sum f = 0 := by
simp [sum]
@[simp]
theorem sum_monomial_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] {n : ℕ} (a : R) (f : ℕ → R → S)
(hf : f n 0 = 0) : (monomial n a : R[X]).sum f = f n a :=
Finsupp.sum_single_index hf
@[simp]
theorem sum_C_index {a} {β} [AddCommMonoid β] {f : ℕ → R → β} (h : f 0 0 = 0) :
(C a).sum f = f 0 a :=
sum_monomial_index a f h
-- the assumption `hf` is only necessary when the ring is trivial
@[simp]
theorem sum_X_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] {f : ℕ → R → S} (hf : f 1 0 = 0) :
(X : R[X]).sum f = f 1 1 :=
sum_monomial_index 1 f hf
theorem sum_add_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p q : R[X]) (f : ℕ → R → S)
(hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) (h_add : ∀ a b₁ b₂, f a (b₁ + b₂) = f a b₁ + f a b₂) :
(p + q).sum f = p.sum f + q.sum f := by
rw [show p + q = ⟨p.toFinsupp + q.toFinsupp⟩ from add_def p q]
exact Finsupp.sum_add_index (fun i _ ↦ hf i) (fun a _ b₁ b₂ ↦ h_add a b₁ b₂)
theorem sum_add' {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (f g : ℕ → R → S) :
p.sum (f + g) = p.sum f + p.sum g := by simp [sum_def, Finset.sum_add_distrib]
theorem sum_add {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (f g : ℕ → R → S) :
(p.sum fun n x => f n x + g n x) = p.sum f + p.sum g :=
sum_add' _ _ _
theorem sum_smul_index {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (b : R) (f : ℕ → R → S)
(hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) : (b • p).sum f = p.sum fun n a => f n (b * a) :=
Finsupp.sum_smul_index hf
theorem sum_smul_index' {S T : Type*} [DistribSMul T R] [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) (b : T)
(f : ℕ → R → S) (hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) : (b • p).sum f = p.sum fun n a => f n (b • a) :=
Finsupp.sum_smul_index' hf
protected theorem smul_sum {S T : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] [DistribSMul T S] (p : R[X]) (b : T)
(f : ℕ → R → S) : b • p.sum f = p.sum fun n a => b • f n a :=
Finsupp.smul_sum
@[simp]
theorem sum_monomial_eq : ∀ p : R[X], (p.sum fun n a => monomial n a) = p
| ⟨_p⟩ => (ofFinsupp_sum _ _).symm.trans (congr_arg _ <| Finsupp.sum_single _)
theorem sum_C_mul_X_pow_eq (p : R[X]) : (p.sum fun n a => C a * X ^ n) = p := by
simp_rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, sum_monomial_eq]
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {motive : R[X] → Prop} (p : R[X]) (C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(add : ∀ p q, motive p → motive q → motive (p + q))
(monomial : ∀ (n : ℕ) (a : R),
motive (Polynomial.C a * X ^ n) → motive (Polynomial.C a * X ^ (n + 1))) : motive p := by
have A : ∀ {n : ℕ} {a}, motive (Polynomial.C a * X ^ n) := by
intro n a
induction n with
| zero => rw [pow_zero, mul_one]; exact C a
| succ n ih => exact monomial _ _ ih
have B : ∀ s : Finset ℕ, motive (s.sum fun n : ℕ => Polynomial.C (p.coeff n) * X ^ n) := by
apply Finset.induction
· convert C 0
exact C_0.symm
· intro n s ns ih
rw [sum_insert ns]
exact add _ _ A ih
rw [← sum_C_mul_X_pow_eq p, Polynomial.sum]
exact B (support p)
/-- To prove something about polynomials,
it suffices to show the condition is closed under taking sums,
and it holds for monomials.
-/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on' {motive : R[X] → Prop} (p : R[X])
(add : ∀ p q, motive p → motive q → motive (p + q))
(monomial : ∀ (n : ℕ) (a : R), motive (monomial n a)) : motive p :=
Polynomial.induction_on p (monomial 0) add fun n a _h =>
by rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]; exact monomial _ _
/-- `erase p n` is the polynomial `p` in which the `X^n` term has been erased. -/
irreducible_def erase (n : ℕ) : R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨p⟩ => ⟨p.erase n⟩
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_erase (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : toFinsupp (p.erase n) = p.toFinsupp.erase n := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp only [erase_def]
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_erase (p : R[ℕ]) (n : ℕ) :
(⟨p.erase n⟩ : R[X]) = (⟨p⟩ : R[X]).erase n := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp only [erase_def]
@[simp]
theorem support_erase (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : support (p.erase n) = (support p).erase n := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp only [support, erase_def, Finsupp.support_erase]
theorem monomial_add_erase (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : monomial n (coeff p n) + p.erase n = p :=
toFinsupp_injective <| by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
rw [toFinsupp_add, toFinsupp_monomial, toFinsupp_erase, coeff]
exact Finsupp.single_add_erase _ _
theorem coeff_erase (p : R[X]) (n i : ℕ) :
(p.erase n).coeff i = if i = n then 0 else p.coeff i := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp only [erase_def, coeff]
exact ite_congr rfl (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl)
@[simp]
theorem erase_zero (n : ℕ) : (0 : R[X]).erase n = 0 :=
toFinsupp_injective <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem erase_monomial {n : ℕ} {a : R} : erase n (monomial n a) = 0 :=
toFinsupp_injective <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem erase_same (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : coeff (p.erase n) n = 0 := by simp [coeff_erase]
@[simp]
theorem erase_ne (p : R[X]) (n i : ℕ) (h : i ≠ n) : coeff (p.erase n) i = coeff p i := by
simp [coeff_erase, h]
section Update
/-- Replace the coefficient of a `p : R[X]` at a given degree `n : ℕ`
by a given value `a : R`. If `a = 0`, this is equal to `p.erase n`
If `p.natDegree < n` and `a ≠ 0`, this increases the degree to `n`. -/
def update (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (a : R) : R[X] :=
Polynomial.ofFinsupp (p.toFinsupp.update n a)
theorem coeff_update (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (a : R) :
(p.update n a).coeff = Function.update p.coeff n a := by
ext
cases p
simp only [coeff, update, Function.update_apply, coe_update]
theorem coeff_update_apply (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (a : R) (i : ℕ) :
(p.update n a).coeff i = if i = n then a else p.coeff i := by
rw [coeff_update, Function.update_apply]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_update_same (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (a : R) : (p.update n a).coeff n = a := by
rw [p.coeff_update_apply, if_pos rfl]
theorem coeff_update_ne (p : R[X]) {n : ℕ} (a : R) {i : ℕ} (h : i ≠ n) :
(p.update n a).coeff i = p.coeff i := by rw [p.coeff_update_apply, if_neg h]
@[simp]
theorem update_zero_eq_erase (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : p.update n 0 = p.erase n := by
ext
rw [coeff_update_apply, coeff_erase]
theorem support_update (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (a : R) [Decidable (a = 0)] :
support (p.update n a) = if a = 0 then p.support.erase n else insert n p.support := by
classical
cases p
simp only [support, update, Finsupp.support_update]
congr
theorem support_update_zero (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : support (p.update n 0) = p.support.erase n := by
rw [update_zero_eq_erase, support_erase]
theorem support_update_ne_zero (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) {a : R} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
support (p.update n a) = insert n p.support := by classical rw [support_update, if_neg ha]
end Update
/-- The finset of nonzero coefficients of a polynomial. -/
def coeffs (p : R[X]) : Finset R :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
Finset.image (fun n => p.coeff n) p.support
@[simp]
theorem coeffs_zero : coeffs (0 : R[X]) = ∅ :=
rfl
theorem mem_coeffs_iff {p : R[X]} {c : R} : c ∈ p.coeffs ↔ ∃ n ∈ p.support, c = p.coeff n := by
simp [coeffs, eq_comm, (Finset.mem_image)]
theorem coeffs_one : coeffs (1 : R[X]) ⊆ {1} := by
classical
simp_rw [coeffs, Finset.image_subset_iff]
simp_all [coeff_one]
theorem coeff_mem_coeffs (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (h : p.coeff n ≠ 0) : p.coeff n ∈ p.coeffs := by
classical
simp only [coeffs, exists_prop, mem_support_iff, Finset.mem_image, Ne]
exact ⟨n, h, rfl⟩
theorem coeffs_monomial (n : ℕ) {c : R} (hc : c ≠ 0) : (monomial n c).coeffs = {c} := by
rw [coeffs, support_monomial n hc]
simp
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
instance commSemiring : CommSemiring R[X] :=
fast_instance% { Function.Injective.commSemigroup toFinsupp toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_mul with
toSemiring := Polynomial.semiring }
end CommSemiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R]
| instance instZSMul : SMul ℤ R[X] where
smul r p := ⟨r • p.toFinsupp⟩
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_zsmul (a : ℤ) (b) :
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Basic.lean | 1,073 | 1,077 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Buzzard, Johan Commelin, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Operations
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Valuation.Basic
/-!
# The valuation on a quotient ring
The support of a valuation `v : Valuation R Γ₀` is `supp v`. If `J` is an ideal of `R`
with `h : J ⊆ supp v` then the induced valuation
on `R / J` = `Ideal.Quotient J` is `onQuot v h`.
-/
namespace Valuation
variable {R Γ₀ : Type*} [CommRing R] [LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero Γ₀]
variable (v : Valuation R Γ₀)
/-- If `hJ : J ⊆ supp v` then `onQuotVal hJ` is the induced function on `R / J` as a function.
Note: it's just the function; the valuation is `onQuot hJ`. -/
def onQuotVal {J : Ideal R} (hJ : J ≤ supp v) : R ⧸ J → Γ₀ := fun q =>
Quotient.liftOn' q v fun a b h =>
calc
v a = v (b + -(-a + b)) := by simp
_ = v b :=
v.map_add_supp b <| (Ideal.neg_mem_iff _).2 <| hJ <| QuotientAddGroup.leftRel_apply.mp h
/-- The extension of valuation `v` on `R` to valuation on `R / J` if `J ⊆ supp v`. -/
def onQuot {J : Ideal R} (hJ : J ≤ supp v) : Valuation (R ⧸ J) Γ₀ where
toFun := v.onQuotVal hJ
map_zero' := v.map_zero
map_one' := v.map_one
map_mul' xbar ybar := Quotient.ind₂' v.map_mul xbar ybar
map_add_le_max' xbar ybar := Quotient.ind₂' v.map_add xbar ybar
@[simp]
theorem onQuot_comap_eq {J : Ideal R} (hJ : J ≤ supp v) :
(v.onQuot hJ).comap (Ideal.Quotient.mk J) = v :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem self_le_supp_comap (J : Ideal R) (v : Valuation (R ⧸ J) Γ₀) :
J ≤ (v.comap (Ideal.Quotient.mk J)).supp := by
rw [comap_supp, ← Ideal.map_le_iff_le_comap]
simp
@[simp]
theorem comap_onQuot_eq (J : Ideal R) (v : Valuation (R ⧸ J) Γ₀) :
(v.comap (Ideal.Quotient.mk J)).onQuot (v.self_le_supp_comap J) = v :=
ext <| by
rintro ⟨x⟩
rfl
/-- The quotient valuation on `R / J` has support `(supp v) / J` if `J ⊆ supp v`. -/
theorem supp_quot {J : Ideal R} (hJ : J ≤ supp v) :
supp (v.onQuot hJ) = (supp v).map (Ideal.Quotient.mk J) := by
apply le_antisymm
· rintro ⟨x⟩ hx
apply Ideal.subset_span
exact ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
· rw [Ideal.map_le_iff_le_comap]
| intro x hx
exact hx
theorem supp_quot_supp : supp (v.onQuot le_rfl) = 0 := by
rw [supp_quot]
exact Ideal.map_quotient_self _
end Valuation
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Valuation/Quotient.lean | 66 | 74 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Xavier Généreux. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Xavier Généreux, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Basic
/-!
# A collection of specific limit computations for `RCLike`
-/
open Set Algebra Filter
open scoped Topology
variable (𝕜 : Type*) [RCLike 𝕜]
| theorem RCLike.tendsto_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => (n : 𝕜)⁻¹) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
convert tendsto_algebraMap_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat 𝕜
simp
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecificLimits/RCLike.lean | 19 | 22 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.ImproperIntegrals
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.ExpDecay
/-!
# The Gamma function
This file defines the `Γ` function (of a real or complex variable `s`). We define this by Euler's
integral `Γ(s) = ∫ x in Ioi 0, exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)` in the range where this integral converges
(i.e., for `0 < s` in the real case, and `0 < re s` in the complex case).
We show that this integral satisfies `Γ(1) = 1` and `Γ(s + 1) = s * Γ(s)`; hence we can define
`Γ(s)` for all `s` as the unique function satisfying this recurrence and agreeing with Euler's
integral in the convergence range. (If `s = -n` for `n ∈ ℕ`, then the function is undefined, and we
set it to be `0` by convention.)
## Gamma function: main statements (complex case)
* `Complex.Gamma`: the `Γ` function (of a complex variable).
* `Complex.Gamma_eq_integral`: for `0 < re s`, `Γ(s)` agrees with Euler's integral.
* `Complex.Gamma_add_one`: for all `s : ℂ` with `s ≠ 0`, we have `Γ (s + 1) = s Γ(s)`.
* `Complex.Gamma_nat_eq_factorial`: for all `n : ℕ` we have `Γ (n + 1) = n!`.
## Gamma function: main statements (real case)
* `Real.Gamma`: the `Γ` function (of a real variable).
* Real counterparts of all the properties of the complex Gamma function listed above:
`Real.Gamma_eq_integral`, `Real.Gamma_add_one`, `Real.Gamma_nat_eq_factorial`.
## Tags
Gamma
-/
noncomputable section
open Filter intervalIntegral Set Real MeasureTheory Asymptotics
open scoped Nat Topology ComplexConjugate
namespace Real
/-- Asymptotic bound for the `Γ` function integrand. -/
theorem Gamma_integrand_isLittleO (s : ℝ) :
(fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ s) =o[atTop] fun x : ℝ => exp (-(1 / 2) * x) := by
refine isLittleO_of_tendsto (fun x hx => ?_) ?_
· exfalso; exact (exp_pos (-(1 / 2) * x)).ne' hx
have : (fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ s / exp (-(1 / 2) * x)) =
(fun x : ℝ => exp (1 / 2 * x) / x ^ s)⁻¹ := by
ext1 x
field_simp [exp_ne_zero, exp_neg, ← Real.exp_add]
left
ring
rw [this]
exact (tendsto_exp_mul_div_rpow_atTop s (1 / 2) one_half_pos).inv_tendsto_atTop
/-- The Euler integral for the `Γ` function converges for positive real `s`. -/
theorem GammaIntegral_convergent {s : ℝ} (h : 0 < s) :
IntegrableOn (fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)) (Ioi 0) := by
rw [← Ioc_union_Ioi_eq_Ioi (@zero_le_one ℝ _ _ _ _), integrableOn_union]
constructor
· rw [← integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ioc]
refine IntegrableOn.continuousOn_mul continuousOn_id.neg.rexp ?_ isCompact_Icc
refine (intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Icc_of_le zero_le_one).mp ?_
exact intervalIntegrable_rpow' (by linarith)
· refine integrable_of_isBigO_exp_neg one_half_pos ?_ (Gamma_integrand_isLittleO _).isBigO
refine continuousOn_id.neg.rexp.mul (continuousOn_id.rpow_const ?_)
intro x hx
exact Or.inl ((zero_lt_one : (0 : ℝ) < 1).trans_le hx).ne'
end Real
namespace Complex
/- Technical note: In defining the Gamma integrand exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1) for s complex, we have to
make a choice between ↑(Real.exp (-x)), Complex.exp (↑(-x)), and Complex.exp (-↑x), all of which are
equal but not definitionally so. We use the first of these throughout. -/
/-- The integral defining the `Γ` function converges for complex `s` with `0 < re s`.
This is proved by reduction to the real case. -/
theorem GammaIntegral_convergent {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) :
IntegrableOn (fun x => (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) (Ioi 0) := by
constructor
· refine ContinuousOn.aestronglyMeasurable ?_ measurableSet_Ioi
apply (continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_neg.rexp).continuousOn.mul
apply continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt
intro x hx
have : ContinuousAt (fun x : ℂ => x ^ (s - 1)) ↑x :=
continuousAt_cpow_const <| ofReal_mem_slitPlane.2 hx
exact ContinuousAt.comp this continuous_ofReal.continuousAt
· rw [← hasFiniteIntegral_norm_iff]
refine HasFiniteIntegral.congr (Real.GammaIntegral_convergent hs).2 ?_
apply (ae_restrict_iff' measurableSet_Ioi).mpr
filter_upwards with x hx
rw [norm_mul, Complex.norm_of_nonneg <| le_of_lt <| exp_pos <| -x,
norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx _]
simp
/-- Euler's integral for the `Γ` function (of a complex variable `s`), defined as
`∫ x in Ioi 0, exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)`.
See `Complex.GammaIntegral_convergent` for a proof of the convergence of the integral for
`0 < re s`. -/
def GammaIntegral (s : ℂ) : ℂ :=
∫ x in Ioi (0 : ℝ), ↑(-x).exp * ↑x ^ (s - 1)
theorem GammaIntegral_conj (s : ℂ) : GammaIntegral (conj s) = conj (GammaIntegral s) := by
rw [GammaIntegral, GammaIntegral, ← integral_conj]
refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi fun x hx => ?_
dsimp only
rw [RingHom.map_mul, conj_ofReal, cpow_def_of_ne_zero (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr (ne_of_gt hx)),
cpow_def_of_ne_zero (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr (ne_of_gt hx)), ← exp_conj, RingHom.map_mul, ←
ofReal_log (le_of_lt hx), conj_ofReal, RingHom.map_sub, RingHom.map_one]
theorem GammaIntegral_ofReal (s : ℝ) :
GammaIntegral ↑s = ↑(∫ x : ℝ in Ioi 0, Real.exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)) := by
have : ∀ r : ℝ, Complex.ofReal r = @RCLike.ofReal ℂ _ r := fun r => rfl
rw [GammaIntegral]
conv_rhs => rw [this, ← _root_.integral_ofReal]
refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi ?_
intro x hx; dsimp only
conv_rhs => rw [← this]
rw [ofReal_mul, ofReal_cpow (mem_Ioi.mp hx).le]
simp
@[simp]
theorem GammaIntegral_one : GammaIntegral 1 = 1 := by
simpa only [← ofReal_one, GammaIntegral_ofReal, ofReal_inj, sub_self, rpow_zero,
mul_one] using integral_exp_neg_Ioi_zero
end Complex
/-! Now we establish the recurrence relation `Γ(s + 1) = s * Γ(s)` using integration by parts. -/
namespace Complex
section GammaRecurrence
/-- The indefinite version of the `Γ` function, `Γ(s, X) = ∫ x ∈ 0..X, exp(-x) x ^ (s - 1)`. -/
def partialGamma (s : ℂ) (X : ℝ) : ℂ :=
∫ x in (0)..X, (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1)
theorem tendsto_partialGamma {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) :
Tendsto (fun X : ℝ => partialGamma s X) atTop (𝓝 <| GammaIntegral s) :=
intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral_Ioi 0 (GammaIntegral_convergent hs) tendsto_id
private theorem Gamma_integrand_intervalIntegrable (s : ℂ) {X : ℝ} (hs : 0 < s.re) (hX : 0 ≤ X) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 X := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le hX]
exact IntegrableOn.mono_set (GammaIntegral_convergent hs) Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
private theorem Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_A {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) {X : ℝ} (hX : 0 ≤ X) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => -((-x).exp * x ^ s) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 X := by
convert (Gamma_integrand_intervalIntegrable (s + 1) _ hX).neg
· simp only [ofReal_exp, ofReal_neg, add_sub_cancel_right]; rfl
· simp only [add_re, one_re]; linarith
private theorem Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_B {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) {Y : ℝ} (hY : 0 ≤ Y) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x : ℝ => (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 Y := by
have : (fun x => (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) =
(fun x => s * ((-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) := by ext1; ring
rw [this, intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le hY]
constructor
· refine (continuousOn_const.mul ?_).aestronglyMeasurable measurableSet_Ioc
apply (continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_neg.rexp).continuousOn.mul
apply continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt
intro x hx
refine (?_ : ContinuousAt (fun x : ℂ => x ^ (s - 1)) _).comp continuous_ofReal.continuousAt
exact continuousAt_cpow_const <| ofReal_mem_slitPlane.2 hx.1
rw [← hasFiniteIntegral_norm_iff]
simp_rw [norm_mul]
refine (((Real.GammaIntegral_convergent hs).mono_set
Ioc_subset_Ioi_self).hasFiniteIntegral.congr ?_).const_mul _
rw [EventuallyEq, ae_restrict_iff']
· filter_upwards with x hx
rw [Complex.norm_of_nonneg (exp_pos _).le, norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx.1]
simp
· exact measurableSet_Ioc
/-- The recurrence relation for the indefinite version of the `Γ` function. -/
theorem partialGamma_add_one {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) {X : ℝ} (hX : 0 ≤ X) :
partialGamma (s + 1) X = s * partialGamma s X - (-X).exp * X ^ s := by
rw [partialGamma, partialGamma, add_sub_cancel_right]
have F_der_I : ∀ x : ℝ, x ∈ Ioo 0 X → HasDerivAt (fun x => (-x).exp * x ^ s : ℝ → ℂ)
(-((-x).exp * x ^ s) + (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1))) x := by
intro x hx
have d1 : HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (-y).exp) (-(-x).exp) x := by
simpa using (hasDerivAt_neg x).exp
have d2 : HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (y : ℂ) ^ s) (s * x ^ (s - 1)) x := by
have t := @HasDerivAt.cpow_const _ _ _ s (hasDerivAt_id ↑x) ?_
· simpa only [mul_one] using t.comp_ofReal
· exact ofReal_mem_slitPlane.2 hx.1
simpa only [ofReal_neg, neg_mul] using d1.ofReal_comp.mul d2
have cont := (continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_neg.rexp).mul (continuous_ofReal_cpow_const hs)
have der_ible :=
(Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_A hs hX).add (Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_B hs hX)
have int_eval := integral_eq_sub_of_hasDerivAt_of_le hX cont.continuousOn F_der_I der_ible
-- We are basically done here but manipulating the output into the right form is fiddly.
apply_fun fun x : ℂ => -x at int_eval
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_add (Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_A hs hX)
(Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_B hs hX),
intervalIntegral.integral_neg, neg_add, neg_neg] at int_eval
rw [eq_sub_of_add_eq int_eval, sub_neg_eq_add, neg_sub, add_comm, add_sub]
have : (fun x => (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) =
(fun x => s * (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) := by ext1; ring
rw [this]
have t := @integral_const_mul 0 X volume _ _ s fun x : ℝ => (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1)
rw [← t, ofReal_zero, zero_cpow]
· rw [mul_zero, add_zero]; congr 2; ext1; ring
· contrapose! hs; rw [hs, zero_re]
/-- The recurrence relation for the `Γ` integral. -/
theorem GammaIntegral_add_one {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) :
GammaIntegral (s + 1) = s * GammaIntegral s := by
suffices Tendsto (s + 1).partialGamma atTop (𝓝 <| s * GammaIntegral s) by
refine tendsto_nhds_unique ?_ this
apply tendsto_partialGamma; rw [add_re, one_re]; linarith
have : (fun X : ℝ => s * partialGamma s X - X ^ s * (-X).exp) =ᶠ[atTop]
(s + 1).partialGamma := by
apply eventuallyEq_of_mem (Ici_mem_atTop (0 : ℝ))
intro X hX
rw [partialGamma_add_one hs (mem_Ici.mp hX)]
ring_nf
refine Tendsto.congr' this ?_
suffices Tendsto (fun X => -X ^ s * (-X).exp : ℝ → ℂ) atTop (𝓝 0) by
simpa using Tendsto.add (Tendsto.const_mul s (tendsto_partialGamma hs)) this
rw [tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero]
have :
(fun e : ℝ => ‖-(e : ℂ) ^ s * (-e).exp‖) =ᶠ[atTop] fun e : ℝ => e ^ s.re * (-1 * e).exp := by
refine eventuallyEq_of_mem (Ioi_mem_atTop 0) ?_
intro x hx; dsimp only
rw [norm_mul, norm_neg, norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx,
Complex.norm_of_nonneg (exp_pos (-x)).le, neg_mul, one_mul]
exact (tendsto_congr' this).mpr (tendsto_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_atTop_nhds_zero _ _ zero_lt_one)
end GammaRecurrence
/-! Now we define `Γ(s)` on the whole complex plane, by recursion. -/
section GammaDef
/-- The `n`th function in this family is `Γ(s)` if `-n < s.re`, and junk otherwise. -/
noncomputable def GammaAux : ℕ → ℂ → ℂ
| 0 => GammaIntegral
| n + 1 => fun s : ℂ => GammaAux n (s + 1) / s
theorem GammaAux_recurrence1 (s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) (h1 : -s.re < ↑n) :
GammaAux n s = GammaAux n (s + 1) / s := by
induction' n with n hn generalizing s
· simp only [CharP.cast_eq_zero, Left.neg_neg_iff] at h1
dsimp only [GammaAux]; rw [GammaIntegral_add_one h1]
rw [mul_comm, mul_div_cancel_right₀]; contrapose! h1; rw [h1]
simp
· dsimp only [GammaAux]
have hh1 : -(s + 1).re < n := by
rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one] at h1
rw [add_re, one_re]; linarith
rw [← hn (s + 1) hh1]
theorem GammaAux_recurrence2 (s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) (h1 : -s.re < ↑n) :
GammaAux n s = GammaAux (n + 1) s := by
rcases n with - | n
· simp only [CharP.cast_eq_zero, Left.neg_neg_iff] at h1
dsimp only [GammaAux]
rw [GammaIntegral_add_one h1, mul_div_cancel_left₀]
rintro rfl
rw [zero_re] at h1
exact h1.false
· dsimp only [GammaAux]
have : GammaAux n (s + 1 + 1) / (s + 1) = GammaAux n (s + 1) := by
have hh1 : -(s + 1).re < n := by
rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one] at h1
rw [add_re, one_re]; linarith
rw [GammaAux_recurrence1 (s + 1) n hh1]
rw [this]
/-- The `Γ` function (of a complex variable `s`). -/
@[pp_nodot]
irreducible_def Gamma (s : ℂ) : ℂ :=
GammaAux ⌊1 - s.re⌋₊ s
theorem Gamma_eq_GammaAux (s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) (h1 : -s.re < ↑n) : Gamma s = GammaAux n s := by
have u : ∀ k : ℕ, GammaAux (⌊1 - s.re⌋₊ + k) s = Gamma s := by
intro k; induction' k with k hk
· simp [Gamma]
· rw [← hk, ← add_assoc]
refine (GammaAux_recurrence2 s (⌊1 - s.re⌋₊ + k) ?_).symm
rw [Nat.cast_add]
have i0 := Nat.sub_one_lt_floor (1 - s.re)
simp only [sub_sub_cancel_left] at i0
refine lt_add_of_lt_of_nonneg i0 ?_
rw [← Nat.cast_zero, Nat.cast_le]; exact Nat.zero_le k
convert (u <| n - ⌊1 - s.re⌋₊).symm; rw [Nat.add_sub_of_le]
by_cases h : 0 ≤ 1 - s.re
· apply Nat.le_of_lt_succ
exact_mod_cast lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.floor_le h) (by linarith : 1 - s.re < n + 1)
· rw [Nat.floor_of_nonpos]
· omega
· linarith
/-- The recurrence relation for the `Γ` function. -/
theorem Gamma_add_one (s : ℂ) (h2 : s ≠ 0) : Gamma (s + 1) = s * Gamma s := by
let n := ⌊1 - s.re⌋₊
have t1 : -s.re < n := by simpa only [sub_sub_cancel_left] using Nat.sub_one_lt_floor (1 - s.re)
have t2 : -(s + 1).re < n := by rw [add_re, one_re]; linarith
rw [Gamma_eq_GammaAux s n t1, Gamma_eq_GammaAux (s + 1) n t2, GammaAux_recurrence1 s n t1]
field_simp
theorem Gamma_eq_integral {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) : Gamma s = GammaIntegral s :=
Gamma_eq_GammaAux s 0 (by norm_cast; linarith)
@[simp]
theorem Gamma_one : Gamma 1 = 1 := by rw [Gamma_eq_integral] <;> simp
theorem Gamma_nat_eq_factorial (n : ℕ) : Gamma (n + 1) = n ! := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n hn =>
rw [Gamma_add_one n.succ <| Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr <| Nat.succ_ne_zero n]
simp only [Nat.cast_succ, Nat.factorial_succ, Nat.cast_mul]
congr
@[simp]
theorem Gamma_ofNat_eq_factorial (n : ℕ) [(n + 1).AtLeastTwo] :
Gamma (ofNat(n + 1) : ℂ) = n ! :=
mod_cast Gamma_nat_eq_factorial (n : ℕ)
/-- At `0` the Gamma function is undefined; by convention we assign it the value `0`. -/
@[simp]
theorem Gamma_zero : Gamma 0 = 0 := by
simp_rw [Gamma, zero_re, sub_zero, Nat.floor_one, GammaAux, div_zero]
/-- At `-n` for `n ∈ ℕ`, the Gamma function is undefined; by convention we assign it the value 0. -/
theorem Gamma_neg_nat_eq_zero (n : ℕ) : Gamma (-n) = 0 := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [Nat.cast_zero, neg_zero, Gamma_zero]
| succ n IH =>
have A : -(n.succ : ℂ) ≠ 0 := by
rw [neg_ne_zero, Nat.cast_ne_zero]
apply Nat.succ_ne_zero
have : -(n : ℂ) = -↑n.succ + 1 := by simp
rw [this, Gamma_add_one _ A] at IH
contrapose! IH
exact mul_ne_zero A IH
theorem Gamma_conj (s : ℂ) : Gamma (conj s) = conj (Gamma s) := by
suffices ∀ (n : ℕ) (s : ℂ), GammaAux n (conj s) = conj (GammaAux n s) by
simp [Gamma, this]
intro n
induction n with
| zero => rw [GammaAux]; exact GammaIntegral_conj
| succ n IH =>
intro s
rw [GammaAux]
dsimp only
rw [div_eq_mul_inv _ s, RingHom.map_mul, conj_inv, ← div_eq_mul_inv]
suffices conj s + 1 = conj (s + 1) by rw [this, IH]
rw [RingHom.map_add, RingHom.map_one]
/-- Expresses the integral over `Ioi 0` of `t ^ (a - 1) * exp (-(r * t))` in terms of the Gamma
function, for complex `a`. -/
lemma integral_cpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_Ioi {a : ℂ} {r : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a.re) (hr : 0 < r) :
∫ (t : ℝ) in Ioi 0, t ^ (a - 1) * exp (-(r * t)) = (1 / r) ^ a * Gamma a := by
have aux : (1 / r : ℂ) ^ a = 1 / r * (1 / r) ^ (a - 1) := by
nth_rewrite 2 [← cpow_one (1 / r : ℂ)]
rw [← cpow_add _ _ (one_div_ne_zero <| ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hr.ne'), add_sub_cancel]
calc
_ = ∫ (t : ℝ) in Ioi 0, (1 / r) ^ (a - 1) * (r * t) ^ (a - 1) * exp (-(r * t)) := by
refine MeasureTheory.setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi (fun x hx ↦ ?_)
rw [mem_Ioi] at hx
rw [mul_cpow_ofReal_nonneg hr.le hx.le, ← mul_assoc, one_div, ← ofReal_inv,
← mul_cpow_ofReal_nonneg (inv_pos.mpr hr).le hr.le, ← ofReal_mul r⁻¹,
inv_mul_cancel₀ hr.ne', ofReal_one, one_cpow, one_mul]
_ = 1 / r * ∫ (t : ℝ) in Ioi 0, (1 / r) ^ (a - 1) * t ^ (a - 1) * exp (-t) := by
simp_rw [← ofReal_mul]
rw [integral_comp_mul_left_Ioi (fun x ↦ _ * x ^ (a - 1) * exp (-x)) _ hr, mul_zero,
real_smul, ← one_div, ofReal_div, ofReal_one]
_ = 1 / r * (1 / r : ℂ) ^ (a - 1) * (∫ (t : ℝ) in Ioi 0, t ^ (a - 1) * exp (-t)) := by
simp_rw [← MeasureTheory.integral_const_mul, mul_assoc]
_ = (1 / r) ^ a * Gamma a := by
rw [aux, Gamma_eq_integral ha]
congr 2 with x
rw [ofReal_exp, ofReal_neg, mul_comm]
end GammaDef
end Complex
namespace Real
/-- The `Γ` function (of a real variable `s`). -/
@[pp_nodot]
def Gamma (s : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(Complex.Gamma s).re
theorem Gamma_eq_integral {s : ℝ} (hs : 0 < s) :
Gamma s = ∫ x in Ioi 0, exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1) := by
rw [Gamma, Complex.Gamma_eq_integral (by rwa [Complex.ofReal_re] : 0 < Complex.re s)]
dsimp only [Complex.GammaIntegral]
simp_rw [← Complex.ofReal_one, ← Complex.ofReal_sub]
suffices ∫ x : ℝ in Ioi 0, ↑(exp (-x)) * (x : ℂ) ^ ((s - 1 : ℝ) : ℂ) =
∫ x : ℝ in Ioi 0, ((exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1) : ℝ) : ℂ) by
have cc : ∀ r : ℝ, Complex.ofReal r = @RCLike.ofReal ℂ _ r := fun r => rfl
conv_lhs => rw [this]; enter [1, 2, x]; rw [cc]
rw [_root_.integral_ofReal, ← cc, Complex.ofReal_re]
refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi fun x hx => ?_
push_cast
rw [Complex.ofReal_cpow (le_of_lt hx)]
push_cast; rfl
theorem Gamma_add_one {s : ℝ} (hs : s ≠ 0) : Gamma (s + 1) = s * Gamma s := by
simp_rw [Gamma]
rw [Complex.ofReal_add, Complex.ofReal_one, Complex.Gamma_add_one, Complex.re_ofReal_mul]
rwa [Complex.ofReal_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem Gamma_one : Gamma 1 = 1 := by
rw [Gamma, Complex.ofReal_one, Complex.Gamma_one, Complex.one_re]
theorem _root_.Complex.Gamma_ofReal (s : ℝ) : Complex.Gamma (s : ℂ) = Gamma s := by
rw [Gamma, eq_comm, ← Complex.conj_eq_iff_re, ← Complex.Gamma_conj, Complex.conj_ofReal]
theorem Gamma_nat_eq_factorial (n : ℕ) : Gamma (n + 1) = n ! := by
rw [Gamma, Complex.ofReal_add, Complex.ofReal_natCast, Complex.ofReal_one,
Complex.Gamma_nat_eq_factorial, ← Complex.ofReal_natCast, Complex.ofReal_re]
@[simp]
theorem Gamma_ofNat_eq_factorial (n : ℕ) [(n + 1).AtLeastTwo] :
Gamma (ofNat(n + 1) : ℝ) = n ! :=
mod_cast Gamma_nat_eq_factorial (n : ℕ)
/-- At `0` the Gamma function is undefined; by convention we assign it the value `0`. -/
@[simp]
theorem Gamma_zero : Gamma 0 = 0 := by
simpa only [← Complex.ofReal_zero, Complex.Gamma_ofReal, Complex.ofReal_inj] using
Complex.Gamma_zero
/-- At `-n` for `n ∈ ℕ`, the Gamma function is undefined; by convention we assign it the value `0`.
-/
theorem Gamma_neg_nat_eq_zero (n : ℕ) : Gamma (-n) = 0 := by
simpa only [← Complex.ofReal_natCast, ← Complex.ofReal_neg, Complex.Gamma_ofReal,
Complex.ofReal_eq_zero] using Complex.Gamma_neg_nat_eq_zero n
theorem Gamma_pos_of_pos {s : ℝ} (hs : 0 < s) : 0 < Gamma s := by
rw [Gamma_eq_integral hs]
have : (Function.support fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)) ∩ Ioi 0 = Ioi 0 := by
rw [inter_eq_right]
intro x hx
rw [Function.mem_support]
exact mul_ne_zero (exp_pos _).ne' (rpow_pos_of_pos hx _).ne'
rw [setIntegral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae]
· rw [this, volume_Ioi, ← ENNReal.ofReal_zero]
exact ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top
· refine eventually_of_mem (self_mem_ae_restrict measurableSet_Ioi) ?_
exact fun x hx => (mul_pos (exp_pos _) (rpow_pos_of_pos hx _)).le
· exact GammaIntegral_convergent hs
theorem Gamma_nonneg_of_nonneg {s : ℝ} (hs : 0 ≤ s) : 0 ≤ Gamma s := by
obtain rfl | h := eq_or_lt_of_le hs
· rw [Gamma_zero]
· exact (Gamma_pos_of_pos h).le
open Complex in
/-- Expresses the integral over `Ioi 0` of `t ^ (a - 1) * exp (-(r * t))`, for positive real `r`,
in terms of the Gamma function. -/
lemma integral_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_Ioi {a r : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a) (hr : 0 < r) :
∫ t : ℝ in Ioi 0, t ^ (a - 1) * exp (-(r * t)) = (1 / r) ^ a * Gamma a := by
rw [← ofReal_inj, ofReal_mul, ← Gamma_ofReal, ofReal_cpow (by positivity), ofReal_div]
convert integral_cpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_Ioi (by rwa [ofReal_re] : 0 < (a : ℂ).re) hr
refine integral_ofReal.symm.trans <| setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi (fun t ht ↦ ?_)
norm_cast
simp_rw [← ofReal_cpow ht.le, RCLike.ofReal_mul, coe_algebraMap]
open Lean.Meta Qq Mathlib.Meta.Positivity in
/-- The `positivity` extension which identifies expressions of the form `Gamma a`. -/
@[positivity Gamma (_ : ℝ)]
def _root_.Mathlib.Meta.Positivity.evalGamma : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(Gamma $a) =>
match ← core q(inferInstance) q(inferInstance) a with
| .positive pa =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.positive q(Gamma_pos_of_pos $pa))
| .nonnegative pa =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.nonnegative q(Gamma_nonneg_of_nonneg $pa))
| _ => pure .none
| _, _, _ => throwError "failed to match on Gamma application"
/-- The Gamma function does not vanish on `ℝ` (except at non-positive integers, where the function
is mathematically undefined and we set it to `0` by convention). -/
theorem Gamma_ne_zero {s : ℝ} (hs : ∀ m : ℕ, s ≠ -m) : Gamma s ≠ 0 := by
suffices ∀ {n : ℕ}, -(n : ℝ) < s → Gamma s ≠ 0 by
apply this
swap
· exact ⌊-s⌋₊ + 1
rw [neg_lt, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one]
exact Nat.lt_floor_add_one _
intro n
induction n generalizing s with
| zero =>
intro hs
refine (Gamma_pos_of_pos ?_).ne'
rwa [Nat.cast_zero, neg_zero] at hs
| succ _ n_ih =>
intro hs'
have : Gamma (s + 1) ≠ 0 := by
apply n_ih
· intro m
specialize hs (1 + m)
contrapose! hs
rw [← eq_sub_iff_add_eq] at hs
rw [hs]
push_cast
ring
· rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, neg_add] at hs'
linarith
rw [Gamma_add_one, mul_ne_zero_iff] at this
· exact this.2
· simpa using hs 0
theorem Gamma_eq_zero_iff (s : ℝ) : Gamma s = 0 ↔ ∃ m : ℕ, s = -m :=
⟨by contrapose!; exact Gamma_ne_zero, by rintro ⟨m, rfl⟩; exact Gamma_neg_nat_eq_zero m⟩
end Real
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Gamma/Basic.lean | 584 | 593 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.L1Space.Integrable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSpace.Indicator
/-! # Functions integrable on a set and at a filter
We define `IntegrableOn f s μ := Integrable f (μ.restrict s)` and prove theorems like
`integrableOn_union : IntegrableOn f (s ∪ t) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f s μ ∧ IntegrableOn f t μ`.
Next we define a predicate `IntegrableAtFilter (f : α → E) (l : Filter α) (μ : Measure α)`
saying that `f` is integrable at some set `s ∈ l` and prove that a measurable function is integrable
at `l` with respect to `μ` provided that `f` is bounded above at `l ⊓ ae μ` and `μ` is finite
at `l`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory Function
open scoped Topology Interval Filter ENNReal MeasureTheory
variable {α β ε E F : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] [ENorm ε] [TopologicalSpace ε]
section
variable [TopologicalSpace β] {l l' : Filter α} {f g : α → β} {μ ν : Measure α}
/-- A function `f` is strongly measurable at a filter `l` w.r.t. a measure `μ` if it is
ae strongly measurable w.r.t. `μ.restrict s` for some `s ∈ l`. -/
def StronglyMeasurableAtFilter (f : α → β) (l : Filter α) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) :=
∃ s ∈ l, AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict s)
@[simp]
theorem stronglyMeasurableAt_bot {f : α → β} : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f ⊥ μ :=
⟨∅, mem_bot, by simp⟩
protected theorem StronglyMeasurableAtFilter.eventually (h : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l μ) :
∀ᶠ s in l.smallSets, AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict s) :=
(eventually_smallSets' fun _ _ => AEStronglyMeasurable.mono_set).2 h
protected theorem StronglyMeasurableAtFilter.filter_mono (h : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l μ)
(h' : l' ≤ l) : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l' μ :=
let ⟨s, hsl, hs⟩ := h
⟨s, h' hsl, hs⟩
protected theorem MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter
(h : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l μ :=
⟨univ, univ_mem, by rwa [Measure.restrict_univ]⟩
theorem AEStronglyMeasurable.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter_of_mem {s}
(h : AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict s)) (hl : s ∈ l) : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l μ :=
⟨s, hl, h⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-12")]
alias AeStronglyMeasurable.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter_of_mem :=
AEStronglyMeasurable.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter_of_mem
protected theorem MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter
(h : StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l μ :=
h.aestronglyMeasurable.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter
end
namespace MeasureTheory
section NormedAddCommGroup
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_restrict_of_bounded [NormedAddCommGroup E] {f : α → E} {s : Set α}
{μ : Measure α} {C} (hs : μ s < ∞) (hf : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) :
HasFiniteIntegral f (μ.restrict s) :=
haveI : IsFiniteMeasure (μ.restrict s) := ⟨by rwa [Measure.restrict_apply_univ]⟩
hasFiniteIntegral_of_bounded hf
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] {f g : α → E} {s t : Set α} {μ ν : Measure α}
/-- A function is `IntegrableOn` a set `s` if it is almost everywhere strongly measurable on `s`
and if the integral of its pointwise norm over `s` is less than infinity. -/
def IntegrableOn (f : α → ε) (s : Set α) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
Integrable f (μ.restrict s)
theorem IntegrableOn.integrable (h : IntegrableOn f s μ) : Integrable f (μ.restrict s) :=
h
@[simp]
theorem integrableOn_empty : IntegrableOn f ∅ μ := by simp [IntegrableOn, integrable_zero_measure]
@[simp]
theorem integrableOn_univ : IntegrableOn f univ μ ↔ Integrable f μ := by
rw [IntegrableOn, Measure.restrict_univ]
theorem integrableOn_zero : IntegrableOn (fun _ => (0 : E)) s μ :=
integrable_zero _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem integrableOn_const {C : E} : IntegrableOn (fun _ => C) s μ ↔ C = 0 ∨ μ s < ∞ :=
integrable_const_iff.trans <| by rw [isFiniteMeasure_restrict, lt_top_iff_ne_top]
theorem IntegrableOn.mono (h : IntegrableOn f t ν) (hs : s ⊆ t) (hμ : μ ≤ ν) : IntegrableOn f s μ :=
h.mono_measure <| Measure.restrict_mono hs hμ
theorem IntegrableOn.mono_set (h : IntegrableOn f t μ) (hst : s ⊆ t) : IntegrableOn f s μ :=
h.mono hst le_rfl
theorem IntegrableOn.mono_measure (h : IntegrableOn f s ν) (hμ : μ ≤ ν) : IntegrableOn f s μ :=
h.mono (Subset.refl _) hμ
theorem IntegrableOn.mono_set_ae (h : IntegrableOn f t μ) (hst : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) : IntegrableOn f s μ :=
h.integrable.mono_measure <| Measure.restrict_mono_ae hst
theorem IntegrableOn.congr_set_ae (h : IntegrableOn f t μ) (hst : s =ᵐ[μ] t) : IntegrableOn f s μ :=
h.mono_set_ae hst.le
theorem IntegrableOn.congr_fun_ae (h : IntegrableOn f s μ) (hst : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] g) :
IntegrableOn g s μ :=
Integrable.congr h hst
theorem integrableOn_congr_fun_ae (hst : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] g) :
IntegrableOn f s μ ↔ IntegrableOn g s μ :=
⟨fun h => h.congr_fun_ae hst, fun h => h.congr_fun_ae hst.symm⟩
theorem IntegrableOn.congr_fun (h : IntegrableOn f s μ) (hst : EqOn f g s) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
IntegrableOn g s μ :=
h.congr_fun_ae ((ae_restrict_iff' hs).2 (Eventually.of_forall hst))
theorem integrableOn_congr_fun (hst : EqOn f g s) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
IntegrableOn f s μ ↔ IntegrableOn g s μ :=
⟨fun h => h.congr_fun hst hs, fun h => h.congr_fun hst.symm hs⟩
theorem Integrable.integrableOn (h : Integrable f μ) : IntegrableOn f s μ := h.restrict
theorem IntegrableOn.restrict (h : IntegrableOn f s μ) : IntegrableOn f s (μ.restrict t) := by
dsimp only [IntegrableOn] at h ⊢
exact h.mono_measure <| Measure.restrict_mono_measure Measure.restrict_le_self _
theorem IntegrableOn.inter_of_restrict (h : IntegrableOn f s (μ.restrict t)) :
IntegrableOn f (s ∩ t) μ := by
have := h.mono_set (inter_subset_left (t := t))
rwa [IntegrableOn, μ.restrict_restrict_of_subset inter_subset_right] at this
lemma Integrable.piecewise [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)]
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ) (hg : IntegrableOn g sᶜ μ) :
Integrable (s.piecewise f g) μ := by
rw [IntegrableOn] at hf hg
rw [← memLp_one_iff_integrable] at hf hg ⊢
exact MemLp.piecewise hs hf hg
theorem IntegrableOn.left_of_union (h : IntegrableOn f (s ∪ t) μ) : IntegrableOn f s μ :=
h.mono_set subset_union_left
theorem IntegrableOn.right_of_union (h : IntegrableOn f (s ∪ t) μ) : IntegrableOn f t μ :=
h.mono_set subset_union_right
theorem IntegrableOn.union (hs : IntegrableOn f s μ) (ht : IntegrableOn f t μ) :
IntegrableOn f (s ∪ t) μ :=
(hs.add_measure ht).mono_measure <| Measure.restrict_union_le _ _
@[simp]
theorem integrableOn_union : IntegrableOn f (s ∪ t) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f s μ ∧ IntegrableOn f t μ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.left_of_union, h.right_of_union⟩, fun h => h.1.union h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem integrableOn_singleton_iff {x : α} [MeasurableSingletonClass α] :
IntegrableOn f {x} μ ↔ f x = 0 ∨ μ {x} < ∞ := by
have : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict {x}] fun _ => f x := by
filter_upwards [ae_restrict_mem (measurableSet_singleton x)] with _ ha
simp only [mem_singleton_iff.1 ha]
rw [IntegrableOn, integrable_congr this, integrable_const_iff, isFiniteMeasure_restrict,
lt_top_iff_ne_top]
@[simp]
theorem integrableOn_finite_biUnion {s : Set β} (hs : s.Finite) {t : β → Set α} :
IntegrableOn f (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) μ ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, IntegrableOn f (t i) μ := by
induction s, hs using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert _ _ hf => simp [hf, or_imp, forall_and]
@[simp]
theorem integrableOn_finset_iUnion {s : Finset β} {t : β → Set α} :
IntegrableOn f (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) μ ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, IntegrableOn f (t i) μ :=
integrableOn_finite_biUnion s.finite_toSet
@[simp]
theorem integrableOn_finite_iUnion [Finite β] {t : β → Set α} :
IntegrableOn f (⋃ i, t i) μ ↔ ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (t i) μ := by
cases nonempty_fintype β
simpa using @integrableOn_finset_iUnion _ _ _ _ _ f μ Finset.univ t
lemma IntegrableOn.finset [MeasurableSingletonClass α] {μ : Measure α} [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
{s : Finset α} {f : α → E} : IntegrableOn f s μ := by
rw [← s.toSet.biUnion_of_singleton]
simp [integrableOn_finset_iUnion, measure_lt_top]
lemma IntegrableOn.of_finite [MeasurableSingletonClass α] {μ : Measure α} [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
{s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) {f : α → E} : IntegrableOn f s μ := by
simpa using IntegrableOn.finset (s := hs.toFinset)
theorem IntegrableOn.add_measure (hμ : IntegrableOn f s μ) (hν : IntegrableOn f s ν) :
IntegrableOn f s (μ + ν) := by
delta IntegrableOn; rw [Measure.restrict_add]; exact hμ.integrable.add_measure hν
@[simp]
theorem integrableOn_add_measure :
IntegrableOn f s (μ + ν) ↔ IntegrableOn f s μ ∧ IntegrableOn f s ν :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨h.mono_measure (Measure.le_add_right le_rfl), h.mono_measure (Measure.le_add_left le_rfl)⟩,
fun h => h.1.add_measure h.2⟩
theorem _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.integrableOn_map_iff [MeasurableSpace β] {e : α → β}
(he : MeasurableEmbedding e) {f : β → E} {μ : Measure α} {s : Set β} :
IntegrableOn f s (μ.map e) ↔ IntegrableOn (f ∘ e) (e ⁻¹' s) μ := by
simp_rw [IntegrableOn, he.restrict_map, he.integrable_map_iff]
theorem _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.integrableOn_iff_comap [MeasurableSpace β] {e : α → β}
(he : MeasurableEmbedding e) {f : β → E} {μ : Measure β} {s : Set β} (hs : s ⊆ range e) :
IntegrableOn f s μ ↔ IntegrableOn (f ∘ e) (e ⁻¹' s) (μ.comap e) := by
simp_rw [← he.integrableOn_map_iff, he.map_comap, IntegrableOn,
Measure.restrict_restrict_of_subset hs]
theorem _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.integrableOn_range_iff_comap [MeasurableSpace β] {e : α → β}
(he : MeasurableEmbedding e) {f : β → E} {μ : Measure β} :
IntegrableOn f (range e) μ ↔ Integrable (f ∘ e) (μ.comap e) := by
rw [he.integrableOn_iff_comap .rfl, preimage_range, integrableOn_univ]
theorem integrableOn_iff_comap_subtypeVal (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
IntegrableOn f s μ ↔ Integrable (f ∘ (↑) : s → E) (μ.comap (↑)) := by
rw [← (MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).integrableOn_range_iff_comap, Subtype.range_val]
theorem integrableOn_map_equiv [MeasurableSpace β] (e : α ≃ᵐ β) {f : β → E} {μ : Measure α}
{s : Set β} : IntegrableOn f s (μ.map e) ↔ IntegrableOn (f ∘ e) (e ⁻¹' s) μ := by
simp only [IntegrableOn, e.restrict_map, integrable_map_equiv e]
theorem MeasurePreserving.integrableOn_comp_preimage [MeasurableSpace β] {e : α → β} {ν}
(h₁ : MeasurePreserving e μ ν) (h₂ : MeasurableEmbedding e) {f : β → E} {s : Set β} :
IntegrableOn (f ∘ e) (e ⁻¹' s) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f s ν :=
(h₁.restrict_preimage_emb h₂ s).integrable_comp_emb h₂
theorem MeasurePreserving.integrableOn_image [MeasurableSpace β] {e : α → β} {ν}
(h₁ : MeasurePreserving e μ ν) (h₂ : MeasurableEmbedding e) {f : β → E} {s : Set α} :
IntegrableOn f (e '' s) ν ↔ IntegrableOn (f ∘ e) s μ :=
((h₁.restrict_image_emb h₂ s).integrable_comp_emb h₂).symm
theorem integrable_indicator_iff (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Integrable (indicator s f) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f s μ := by
simp_rw [IntegrableOn, Integrable, hasFiniteIntegral_iff_enorm,
| enorm_indicator_eq_indicator_enorm, lintegral_indicator hs,
aestronglyMeasurable_indicator_iff hs]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/IntegrableOn.lean | 251 | 253 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Independence.Kernel
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.Condexp
/-!
# Conditional Independence
We define conditional independence of sets/σ-algebras/functions with respect to a σ-algebra.
Two σ-algebras `m₁` and `m₂` are conditionally independent given a third σ-algebra `m'` if for all
`m₁`-measurable sets `t₁` and `m₂`-measurable sets `t₂`,
`μ⟦t₁ ∩ t₂ | m'⟧ =ᵐ[μ] μ⟦t₁ | m'⟧ * μ⟦t₂ | m'⟧`.
On standard Borel spaces, the conditional expectation with respect to `m'` defines a kernel
`ProbabilityTheory.condExpKernel`, and the definition above is equivalent to
`∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, condExpKernel μ m' ω (t₁ ∩ t₂) = condExpKernel μ m' ω t₁ * condExpKernel μ m' ω t₂`.
We use this property as the definition of conditional independence.
## Main definitions
We provide four definitions of conditional independence:
* `iCondIndepSets`: conditional independence of a family of sets of sets `pi : ι → Set (Set Ω)`.
This is meant to be used with π-systems.
* `iCondIndep`: conditional independence of a family of measurable space structures
`m : ι → MeasurableSpace Ω`,
* `iCondIndepSet`: conditional independence of a family of sets `s : ι → Set Ω`,
* `iCondIndepFun`: conditional independence of a family of functions. For measurable spaces
`m : Π (i : ι), MeasurableSpace (β i)`, we consider functions `f : Π (i : ι), Ω → β i`.
Additionally, we provide four corresponding statements for two measurable space structures (resp.
sets of sets, sets, functions) instead of a family. These properties are denoted by the same names
as for a family, but without the starting `i`, for example `CondIndepFun` is the version of
`iCondIndepFun` for two functions.
## Main statements
* `ProbabilityTheory.iCondIndepSets.iCondIndep`: if π-systems are conditionally independent as sets
of sets, then the measurable space structures they generate are conditionally independent.
* `ProbabilityTheory.condIndepSets.condIndep`: variant with two π-systems.
## Implementation notes
The definitions of conditional independence in this file are a particular case of independence with
respect to a kernel and a measure, as defined in the file `Probability/Independence/Kernel.lean`.
The kernel used is `ProbabilityTheory.condExpKernel`.
-/
open MeasureTheory MeasurableSpace
open scoped MeasureTheory ENNReal
namespace ProbabilityTheory
variable {Ω ι : Type*}
section Definitions
section
variable (m' : MeasurableSpace Ω) {mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} [StandardBorelSpace Ω] (hm' : m' ≤ mΩ)
/-- A family of sets of sets `π : ι → Set (Set Ω)` is conditionally independent given `m'` with
respect to a measure `μ` if for any finite set of indices `s = {i_1, ..., i_n}`, for any sets
`f i_1 ∈ π i_1, ..., f i_n ∈ π i_n`, then `μ⟦⋂ i in s, f i | m'⟧ =ᵐ[μ] ∏ i ∈ s, μ⟦f i | m'⟧`.
See `ProbabilityTheory.iCondIndepSets_iff`.
It will be used for families of pi_systems. -/
def iCondIndepSets (π : ι → Set (Set Ω)) (μ : Measure Ω := by volume_tac) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] :
Prop :=
Kernel.iIndepSets π (condExpKernel μ m') (μ.trim hm')
/-- Two sets of sets `s₁, s₂` are conditionally independent given `m'` with respect to a measure
`μ` if for any sets `t₁ ∈ s₁, t₂ ∈ s₂`, then `μ⟦t₁ ∩ t₂ | m'⟧ =ᵐ[μ] μ⟦t₁ | m'⟧ * μ⟦t₂ | m'⟧`.
See `ProbabilityTheory.condIndepSets_iff`. -/
def CondIndepSets (s1 s2 : Set (Set Ω)) (μ : Measure Ω := by volume_tac) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] :
Prop :=
Kernel.IndepSets s1 s2 (condExpKernel μ m') (μ.trim hm')
/-- A family of measurable space structures (i.e. of σ-algebras) is conditionally independent given
`m'` with respect to a measure `μ` (typically defined on a finer σ-algebra) if the family of sets of
measurable sets they define is independent. `m : ι → MeasurableSpace Ω` is conditionally independent
given `m'` with respect to measure `μ` if for any finite set of indices `s = {i_1, ..., i_n}`, for
any sets `f i_1 ∈ m i_1, ..., f i_n ∈ m i_n`, then
`μ⟦⋂ i in s, f i | m'⟧ =ᵐ[μ] ∏ i ∈ s, μ⟦f i | m'⟧ `.
See `ProbabilityTheory.iCondIndep_iff`. -/
def iCondIndep (m : ι → MeasurableSpace Ω)
(μ : @Measure Ω mΩ := by volume_tac) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] : Prop :=
Kernel.iIndep m (condExpKernel (mΩ := mΩ) μ m') (μ.trim hm')
end
/-- Two measurable space structures (or σ-algebras) `m₁, m₂` are conditionally independent given
`m'` with respect to a measure `μ` (defined on a third σ-algebra) if for any sets
`t₁ ∈ m₁, t₂ ∈ m₂`, `μ⟦t₁ ∩ t₂ | m'⟧ =ᵐ[μ] μ⟦t₁ | m'⟧ * μ⟦t₂ | m'⟧`.
See `ProbabilityTheory.condIndep_iff`. -/
def CondIndep (m' m₁ m₂ : MeasurableSpace Ω)
{mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} [StandardBorelSpace Ω]
(hm' : m' ≤ mΩ) (μ : Measure Ω := by volume_tac) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] : Prop :=
Kernel.Indep m₁ m₂ (condExpKernel μ m') (μ.trim hm')
section
variable (m' : MeasurableSpace Ω) {mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} [StandardBorelSpace Ω]
(hm' : m' ≤ mΩ)
/-- A family of sets is conditionally independent if the family of measurable space structures they
generate is conditionally independent. For a set `s`, the generated measurable space has measurable
sets `∅, s, sᶜ, univ`.
See `ProbabilityTheory.iCondIndepSet_iff`. -/
def iCondIndepSet (s : ι → Set Ω) (μ : Measure Ω := by volume_tac) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] : Prop :=
Kernel.iIndepSet s (condExpKernel μ m') (μ.trim hm')
/-- Two sets are conditionally independent if the two measurable space structures they generate are
conditionally independent. For a set `s`, the generated measurable space structure has measurable
sets `∅, s, sᶜ, univ`.
See `ProbabilityTheory.condIndepSet_iff`. -/
def CondIndepSet (s t : Set Ω) (μ : Measure Ω := by volume_tac) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] : Prop :=
Kernel.IndepSet s t (condExpKernel μ m') (μ.trim hm')
/-- A family of functions defined on the same space `Ω` and taking values in possibly different
spaces, each with a measurable space structure, is conditionally independent if the family of
measurable space structures they generate on `Ω` is conditionally independent. For a function `g`
with codomain having measurable space structure `m`, the generated measurable space structure is
`m.comap g`.
See `ProbabilityTheory.iCondIndepFun_iff`. -/
def iCondIndepFun {β : ι → Type*} [m : ∀ x : ι, MeasurableSpace (β x)]
(f : ∀ x : ι, Ω → β x) (μ : Measure Ω := by volume_tac) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] : Prop :=
Kernel.iIndepFun f (condExpKernel μ m') (μ.trim hm')
/-- Two functions are conditionally independent if the two measurable space structures they generate
are conditionally independent. For a function `f` with codomain having measurable space structure
`m`, the generated measurable space structure is `m.comap f`.
See `ProbabilityTheory.condIndepFun_iff`. -/
def CondIndepFun {β γ : Type*} [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace γ]
(f : Ω → β) (g : Ω → γ) (μ : Measure Ω := by volume_tac) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] : Prop :=
Kernel.IndepFun f g (condExpKernel μ m') (μ.trim hm')
end
end Definitions
section DefinitionLemmas
section
variable (m' : MeasurableSpace Ω) {mΩ : MeasurableSpace Ω} [StandardBorelSpace Ω] (hm' : m' ≤ mΩ)
lemma iCondIndepSets_iff (π : ι → Set (Set Ω)) (hπ : ∀ i s (_hs : s ∈ π i), MeasurableSet s)
(μ : Measure Ω) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] :
iCondIndepSets m' hm' π μ ↔ ∀ (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → Set Ω} (_H : ∀ i, i ∈ s → f i ∈ π i),
μ⟦⋂ i ∈ s, f i | m'⟧ =ᵐ[μ] ∏ i ∈ s, (μ⟦f i | m'⟧) := by
simp only [iCondIndepSets, Kernel.iIndepSets]
have h_eq' : ∀ (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Set Ω) (_H : ∀ i, i ∈ s → f i ∈ π i) i (_hi : i ∈ s),
(fun ω ↦ ENNReal.toReal (condExpKernel μ m' ω (f i))) =ᵐ[μ] μ⟦f i | m'⟧ :=
fun s f H i hi ↦ condExpKernel_ae_eq_condExp hm' (hπ i (f i) (H i hi))
have h_eq : ∀ (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Set Ω) (_H : ∀ i, i ∈ s → f i ∈ π i), ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ,
∀ i ∈ s, ENNReal.toReal (condExpKernel μ m' ω (f i)) = (μ⟦f i | m'⟧) ω := by
intros s f H
simp_rw [← Finset.mem_coe]
rw [ae_ball_iff (Finset.countable_toSet s)]
exact h_eq' s f H
have h_inter_eq : ∀ (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Set Ω) (_H : ∀ i, i ∈ s → f i ∈ π i),
(fun ω ↦ ENNReal.toReal (condExpKernel μ m' ω (⋂ i ∈ s, f i)))
=ᵐ[μ] μ⟦⋂ i ∈ s, f i | m'⟧ := by
refine fun s f H ↦ condExpKernel_ae_eq_condExp hm' ?_
exact MeasurableSet.biInter (Finset.countable_toSet _) (fun i hi ↦ hπ i _ (H i hi))
refine ⟨fun h s f hf ↦ ?_, fun h s f hf ↦ ?_⟩ <;> specialize h s hf
· have h' := ae_eq_of_ae_eq_trim h
filter_upwards [h_eq s f hf, h_inter_eq s f hf, h'] with ω h_eq h_inter_eq h'
rw [← h_inter_eq, h', ENNReal.toReal_prod, Finset.prod_apply]
exact Finset.prod_congr rfl h_eq
· refine ((stronglyMeasurable_condExpKernel ?_).ae_eq_trim_iff hm' ?_).mpr ?_
· exact .biInter (Finset.countable_toSet _) (fun i hi ↦ hπ i _ (hf i hi))
· refine Measurable.stronglyMeasurable ?_
exact Finset.measurable_prod s (fun i hi ↦ measurable_condExpKernel (hπ i _ (hf i hi)))
filter_upwards [h_eq s f hf, h_inter_eq s f hf, h] with ω h_eq h_inter_eq h
have h_ne_top : condExpKernel μ m' ω (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) ≠ ∞ :=
(measure_ne_top (condExpKernel μ m' ω) _)
have : (∏ i ∈ s, condExpKernel μ m' ω (f i)) ≠ ∞ :=
ENNReal.prod_ne_top fun _ _ ↦ measure_ne_top (condExpKernel μ m' ω) _
rw [← ENNReal.ofReal_toReal h_ne_top, h_inter_eq, h, Finset.prod_apply,
← ENNReal.ofReal_toReal this, ENNReal.toReal_prod]
congr 1
exact Finset.prod_congr rfl (fun i hi ↦ (h_eq i hi).symm)
lemma condIndepSets_iff (s1 s2 : Set (Set Ω)) (hs1 : ∀ s ∈ s1, MeasurableSet s)
(hs2 : ∀ s ∈ s2, MeasurableSet s) (μ : Measure Ω) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] :
CondIndepSets m' hm' s1 s2 μ ↔ ∀ (t1 t2 : Set Ω) (_ : t1 ∈ s1) (_ : t2 ∈ s2),
(μ⟦t1 ∩ t2 | m'⟧) =ᵐ[μ] (μ⟦t1 | m'⟧) * (μ⟦t2 | m'⟧) := by
simp only [CondIndepSets, Kernel.IndepSets]
have hs1_eq : ∀ s ∈ s1, (fun ω ↦ ENNReal.toReal (condExpKernel μ m' ω s)) =ᵐ[μ] μ⟦s | m'⟧ :=
fun s hs ↦ condExpKernel_ae_eq_condExp hm' (hs1 s hs)
have hs2_eq : ∀ s ∈ s2, (fun ω ↦ ENNReal.toReal (condExpKernel μ m' ω s)) =ᵐ[μ] μ⟦s | m'⟧ :=
fun s hs ↦ condExpKernel_ae_eq_condExp hm' (hs2 s hs)
have hs12_eq : ∀ s ∈ s1, ∀ t ∈ s2, (fun ω ↦ ENNReal.toReal (condExpKernel μ m' ω (s ∩ t)))
=ᵐ[μ] μ⟦s ∩ t | m'⟧ :=
fun s hs t ht ↦ condExpKernel_ae_eq_condExp hm' ((hs1 s hs).inter ((hs2 t ht)))
refine ⟨fun h s t hs ht ↦ ?_, fun h s t hs ht ↦ ?_⟩ <;> specialize h s t hs ht
· have h' := ae_eq_of_ae_eq_trim h
filter_upwards [hs1_eq s hs, hs2_eq t ht, hs12_eq s hs t ht, h'] with ω hs_eq ht_eq hst_eq h'
rw [← hst_eq, Pi.mul_apply, ← hs_eq, ← ht_eq, h', ENNReal.toReal_mul]
· refine ((stronglyMeasurable_condExpKernel ((hs1 s hs).inter (hs2 t ht))).ae_eq_trim_iff hm'
((measurable_condExpKernel (hs1 s hs)).mul
(measurable_condExpKernel (hs2 t ht))).stronglyMeasurable).mpr ?_
filter_upwards [hs1_eq s hs, hs2_eq t ht, hs12_eq s hs t ht, h] with ω hs_eq ht_eq hst_eq h
have h_ne_top : condExpKernel μ m' ω (s ∩ t) ≠ ∞ := measure_ne_top (condExpKernel μ m' ω) _
rw [← ENNReal.ofReal_toReal h_ne_top, hst_eq, h, Pi.mul_apply, ← hs_eq, ← ht_eq,
← ENNReal.toReal_mul, ENNReal.ofReal_toReal]
exact ENNReal.mul_ne_top (measure_ne_top (condExpKernel μ m' ω) s)
(measure_ne_top (condExpKernel μ m' ω) t)
lemma iCondIndepSets_singleton_iff (s : ι → Set Ω) (hπ : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i))
(μ : Measure Ω) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] :
iCondIndepSets m' hm' (fun i ↦ {s i}) μ ↔ ∀ S : Finset ι,
μ⟦⋂ i ∈ S, s i | m'⟧ =ᵐ[μ] ∏ i ∈ S, (μ⟦s i | m'⟧) := by
rw [iCondIndepSets_iff]
· simp only [Set.mem_singleton_iff]
refine ⟨fun h S ↦ h S (fun i _ ↦ rfl), fun h S f hf ↦ ?_⟩
filter_upwards [h S] with a ha
refine Eq.trans ?_ (ha.trans ?_)
· congr
apply congr_arg₂
· exact Set.iInter₂_congr hf
· rfl
· simp_rw [Finset.prod_apply]
refine Finset.prod_congr rfl (fun i hi ↦ ?_)
rw [hf i hi]
· simpa only [Set.mem_singleton_iff, forall_eq]
theorem condIndepSets_singleton_iff {μ : Measure Ω} [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
{s t : Set Ω} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
CondIndepSets m' hm' {s} {t} μ ↔ (μ⟦s ∩ t | m'⟧) =ᵐ[μ] (μ⟦s | m'⟧) * (μ⟦t | m'⟧) := by
rw [condIndepSets_iff _ _ _ _ ?_ ?_]
· simp only [Set.mem_singleton_iff, forall_eq_apply_imp_iff, forall_eq]
· intros s' hs'
| rw [Set.mem_singleton_iff] at hs'
rwa [hs']
· intros s' hs'
rw [Set.mem_singleton_iff] at hs'
rwa [hs']
lemma iCondIndep_iff_iCondIndepSets (m : ι → MeasurableSpace Ω)
(μ : @Measure Ω mΩ) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] :
iCondIndep m' hm' m μ ↔ iCondIndepSets m' hm' (fun x ↦ {s | MeasurableSet[m x] s}) μ := by
simp only [iCondIndep, iCondIndepSets, Kernel.iIndep]
| Mathlib/Probability/Independence/Conditional.lean | 239 | 249 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Minchao Wu, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Attach
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Disjoint
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Erase
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Filter
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Range
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.SDiff
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Order.Directed
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.SymmDiff
/-!
# Basic lemmas on finite sets
This file contains lemmas on the interaction of various definitions on the `Finset` type.
For an explanation of `Finset` design decisions, please see `Mathlib/Data/Finset/Defs.lean`.
## Main declarations
### Main definitions
* `Finset.choose`: Given a proof `h` of existence and uniqueness of a certain element
satisfying a predicate, `choose s h` returns the element of `s` satisfying that predicate.
### Equivalences between finsets
* The `Mathlib/Logic/Equiv/Defs.lean` file describes a general type of equivalence, so look in there
for any lemmas. There is some API for rewriting sums and products from `s` to `t` given that
`s ≃ t`.
TODO: examples
## Tags
finite sets, finset
-/
-- Assert that we define `Finset` without the material on `List.sublists`.
-- Note that we cannot use `List.sublists` itself as that is defined very early.
assert_not_exists List.sublistsLen Multiset.powerset CompleteLattice Monoid
open Multiset Subtype Function
universe u
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
namespace Finset
-- TODO: these should be global attributes, but this will require fixing other files
attribute [local trans] Subset.trans Superset.trans
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {s : Finset α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf s := by
cases s
dsimp [SizeOf.sizeOf, SizeOf.sizeOf, Multiset.sizeOf]
rw [Nat.add_comm]
refine lt_trans ?_ (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
exact Multiset.sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem hx
/-! ### Lattice structure -/
section Lattice
variable [DecidableEq α] {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-! #### union -/
@[simp]
theorem disjUnion_eq_union (s t h) : @disjUnion α s t h = s ∪ t :=
ext fun a => by simp
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_union_left : Disjoint (s ∪ t) u ↔ Disjoint s u ∧ Disjoint t u := by
simp only [disjoint_left, mem_union, or_imp, forall_and]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_union_right : Disjoint s (t ∪ u) ↔ Disjoint s t ∧ Disjoint s u := by
simp only [disjoint_right, mem_union, or_imp, forall_and]
/-! #### inter -/
theorem not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter : ¬Disjoint s t ↔ (s ∩ t).Nonempty :=
not_disjoint_iff.trans <| by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.not_disjoint⟩ := not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter
theorem disjoint_or_nonempty_inter (s t : Finset α) : Disjoint s t ∨ (s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
exact em _
omit [DecidableEq α] in
theorem disjoint_of_subset_iff_left_eq_empty (h : s ⊆ t) :
Disjoint s t ↔ s = ∅ :=
disjoint_of_le_iff_left_eq_bot h
lemma pairwiseDisjoint_iff {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} {f : ι → Finset α} :
s.PairwiseDisjoint f ↔ ∀ ⦃i⦄, i ∈ s → ∀ ⦃j⦄, j ∈ s → (f i ∩ f j).Nonempty → i = j := by
simp [Set.PairwiseDisjoint, Set.Pairwise, Function.onFun, not_imp_comm (a := _ = _),
not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
end Lattice
instance isDirected_le : IsDirected (Finset α) (· ≤ ·) := by classical infer_instance
instance isDirected_subset : IsDirected (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) := isDirected_le
/-! ### erase -/
section Erase
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem erase_empty (a : α) : erase ∅ a = ∅ :=
rfl
protected lemma Nontrivial.erase_nonempty (hs : s.Nontrivial) : (s.erase a).Nonempty :=
(hs.exists_ne a).imp <| by aesop
@[simp] lemma erase_nonempty (ha : a ∈ s) : (s.erase a).Nonempty ↔ s.Nontrivial := by
simp only [Finset.Nonempty, mem_erase, and_comm (b := _ ∈ _)]
refine ⟨?_, fun hs ↦ hs.exists_ne a⟩
rintro ⟨b, hb, hba⟩
exact ⟨_, hb, _, ha, hba⟩
@[simp]
theorem erase_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Finset α).erase a = ∅ := by
ext x
simp
@[simp]
theorem erase_insert_eq_erase (s : Finset α) (a : α) : (insert a s).erase a = s.erase a :=
ext fun x => by
simp +contextual only [mem_erase, mem_insert, and_congr_right_iff,
false_or, iff_self, imp_true_iff]
theorem erase_insert {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∉ s) : erase (insert a s) a = s := by
rw [erase_insert_eq_erase, erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
theorem erase_insert_of_ne {a b : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ≠ b) :
erase (insert a s) b = insert a (erase s b) :=
ext fun x => by
have : x ≠ b ∧ x = a ↔ x = a := and_iff_right_of_imp fun hx => hx.symm ▸ h
simp only [mem_erase, mem_insert, and_or_left, this]
theorem erase_cons_of_ne {a b : α} {s : Finset α} (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : a ≠ b) :
erase (cons a s ha) b = cons a (erase s b) fun h => ha <| erase_subset _ _ h := by
simp only [cons_eq_insert, erase_insert_of_ne hb]
@[simp] theorem insert_erase (h : a ∈ s) : insert a (erase s a) = s :=
ext fun x => by
simp only [mem_insert, mem_erase, or_and_left, dec_em, true_and]
apply or_iff_right_of_imp
rintro rfl
exact h
lemma erase_eq_iff_eq_insert (hs : a ∈ s) (ht : a ∉ t) : erase s a = t ↔ s = insert a t := by
aesop
lemma insert_erase_invOn :
Set.InvOn (insert a) (fun s ↦ erase s a) {s : Finset α | a ∈ s} {s : Finset α | a ∉ s} :=
⟨fun _s ↦ insert_erase, fun _s ↦ erase_insert⟩
theorem erase_ssubset {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∈ s) : s.erase a ⊂ s :=
calc
s.erase a ⊂ insert a (s.erase a) := ssubset_insert <| not_mem_erase _ _
_ = _ := insert_erase h
theorem ssubset_iff_exists_subset_erase {s t : Finset α} : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ t, s ⊆ t.erase a := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨a, ha, h⟩ => ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset h <| erase_ssubset ha⟩
obtain ⟨a, ht, hs⟩ := not_subset.1 h.2
exact ⟨a, ht, subset_erase.2 ⟨h.1, hs⟩⟩
theorem erase_ssubset_insert (s : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a ⊂ insert a s :=
ssubset_iff_exists_subset_erase.2
⟨a, mem_insert_self _ _, erase_subset_erase _ <| subset_insert _ _⟩
theorem erase_cons {s : Finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) : (s.cons a h).erase a = s := by
rw [cons_eq_insert, erase_insert_eq_erase, erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
theorem subset_insert_iff {a : α} {s t : Finset α} : s ⊆ insert a t ↔ erase s a ⊆ t := by
simp only [subset_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left, mem_erase, mem_insert, and_imp]
exact forall_congr' fun x => forall_swap
theorem erase_insert_subset (a : α) (s : Finset α) : erase (insert a s) a ⊆ s :=
subset_insert_iff.1 <| Subset.rfl
theorem insert_erase_subset (a : α) (s : Finset α) : s ⊆ insert a (erase s a) :=
subset_insert_iff.2 <| Subset.rfl
theorem subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊆ insert a t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
rw [subset_insert_iff, erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
theorem erase_subset_iff_of_mem (h : a ∈ t) : s.erase a ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
rw [← subset_insert_iff, insert_eq_of_mem h]
theorem erase_injOn' (a : α) : { s : Finset α | a ∈ s }.InjOn fun s => erase s a :=
fun s hs t ht (h : s.erase a = _) => by rw [← insert_erase hs, ← insert_erase ht, h]
end Erase
lemma Nontrivial.exists_cons_eq {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nontrivial) :
∃ t a ha b hb hab, (cons b t hb).cons a (mem_cons.not.2 <| not_or_intro hab ha) = s := by
classical
obtain ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab⟩ := hs
have : b ∈ s.erase a := mem_erase.2 ⟨hab.symm, hb⟩
refine ⟨(s.erase a).erase b, a, ?_, b, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
simp [insert_erase this, insert_erase ha, *]
/-! ### sdiff -/
section Sdiff
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
lemma erase_sdiff_erase (hab : a ≠ b) (hb : b ∈ s) : s.erase a \ s.erase b = {b} := by
ext; aesop
-- TODO: Do we want to delete this lemma and `Finset.disjUnion_singleton`,
-- or instead add `Finset.union_singleton`/`Finset.singleton_union`?
theorem sdiff_singleton_eq_erase (a : α) (s : Finset α) : s \ {a} = erase s a := by
ext
rw [mem_erase, mem_sdiff, mem_singleton, and_comm]
-- This lemma matches `Finset.insert_eq` in functionality.
theorem erase_eq (s : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a = s \ {a} :=
(sdiff_singleton_eq_erase _ _).symm
theorem disjoint_erase_comm : Disjoint (s.erase a) t ↔ Disjoint s (t.erase a) := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, disjoint_sdiff_comm]
lemma disjoint_insert_erase (ha : a ∉ t) : Disjoint (s.erase a) (insert a t) ↔ Disjoint s t := by
rw [disjoint_erase_comm, erase_insert ha]
lemma disjoint_erase_insert (ha : a ∉ s) : Disjoint (insert a s) (t.erase a) ↔ Disjoint s t := by
rw [← disjoint_erase_comm, erase_insert ha]
theorem disjoint_of_erase_left (ha : a ∉ t) (hst : Disjoint (s.erase a) t) : Disjoint s t := by
rw [← erase_insert ha, ← disjoint_erase_comm, disjoint_insert_right]
exact ⟨not_mem_erase _ _, hst⟩
theorem disjoint_of_erase_right (ha : a ∉ s) (hst : Disjoint s (t.erase a)) : Disjoint s t := by
rw [← erase_insert ha, disjoint_erase_comm, disjoint_insert_left]
exact ⟨not_mem_erase _ _, hst⟩
theorem inter_erase (a : α) (s t : Finset α) : s ∩ t.erase a = (s ∩ t).erase a := by
simp only [erase_eq, inter_sdiff_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem erase_inter (a : α) (s t : Finset α) : s.erase a ∩ t = (s ∩ t).erase a := by
simpa only [inter_comm t] using inter_erase a t s
theorem erase_sdiff_comm (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a \ t = (s \ t).erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, sdiff_right_comm]
theorem erase_inter_comm (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a ∩ t = s ∩ t.erase a := by
rw [erase_inter, inter_erase]
theorem erase_union_distrib (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : (s ∪ t).erase a = s.erase a ∪ t.erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, union_sdiff_distrib]
theorem insert_inter_distrib (s t : Finset α) (a : α) :
insert a (s ∩ t) = insert a s ∩ insert a t := by simp_rw [insert_eq, union_inter_distrib_left]
theorem erase_sdiff_distrib (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : (s \ t).erase a = s.erase a \ t.erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, sdiff_sdiff, sup_sdiff_eq_sup le_rfl, sup_comm]
theorem erase_union_of_mem (ha : a ∈ t) (s : Finset α) : s.erase a ∪ t = s ∪ t := by
rw [← insert_erase (mem_union_right s ha), erase_union_distrib, ← union_insert, insert_erase ha]
theorem union_erase_of_mem (ha : a ∈ s) (t : Finset α) : s ∪ t.erase a = s ∪ t := by
rw [← insert_erase (mem_union_left t ha), erase_union_distrib, ← insert_union, insert_erase ha]
theorem sdiff_union_erase_cancel (hts : t ⊆ s) (ha : a ∈ t) : s \ t ∪ t.erase a = s.erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, sdiff_union_sdiff_cancel hts (singleton_subset_iff.2 ha)]
theorem sdiff_insert (s t : Finset α) (x : α) : s \ insert x t = (s \ t).erase x := by
simp_rw [← sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, insert_eq, sdiff_sdiff_left', sdiff_union_distrib,
inter_comm]
theorem sdiff_insert_insert_of_mem_of_not_mem {s t : Finset α} {x : α} (hxs : x ∈ s) (hxt : x ∉ t) :
insert x (s \ insert x t) = s \ t := by
rw [sdiff_insert, insert_erase (mem_sdiff.mpr ⟨hxs, hxt⟩)]
theorem sdiff_erase (h : a ∈ s) : s \ t.erase a = insert a (s \ t) := by
rw [← sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, sdiff_sdiff_eq_sdiff_union (singleton_subset_iff.2 h), insert_eq,
union_comm]
theorem sdiff_erase_self (ha : a ∈ s) : s \ s.erase a = {a} := by
rw [sdiff_erase ha, Finset.sdiff_self, insert_empty_eq]
theorem erase_eq_empty_iff (s : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ s = {a} := by
rw [← sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, sdiff_eq_empty_iff_subset, subset_singleton_iff]
--TODO@Yaël: Kill lemmas duplicate with `BooleanAlgebra`
theorem sdiff_disjoint : Disjoint (t \ s) s :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _a ha => (mem_sdiff.1 ha).2
theorem disjoint_sdiff : Disjoint s (t \ s) :=
sdiff_disjoint.symm
theorem disjoint_sdiff_inter (s t : Finset α) : Disjoint (s \ t) (s ∩ t) :=
disjoint_of_subset_right inter_subset_right sdiff_disjoint
end Sdiff
/-! ### attach -/
@[simp]
theorem attach_empty : attach (∅ : Finset α) = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem attach_nonempty_iff {s : Finset α} : s.attach.Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty := by
simp [Finset.Nonempty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected alias ⟨_, Nonempty.attach⟩ := attach_nonempty_iff
@[simp]
theorem attach_eq_empty_iff {s : Finset α} : s.attach = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
/-! ### filter -/
section Filter
variable (p q : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] {s t : Finset α}
theorem filter_singleton (a : α) : filter p {a} = if p a then {a} else ∅ := by
classical
ext x
simp only [mem_singleton, forall_eq, mem_filter]
split_ifs with h <;> by_cases h' : x = a <;> simp [h, h']
theorem filter_cons_of_pos (a : α) (s : Finset α) (ha : a ∉ s) (hp : p a) :
filter p (cons a s ha) = cons a (filter p s) ((mem_of_mem_filter _).mt ha) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.filter_cons_of_pos s.val hp
theorem filter_cons_of_neg (a : α) (s : Finset α) (ha : a ∉ s) (hp : ¬p a) :
filter p (cons a s ha) = filter p s :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.filter_cons_of_neg s.val hp
theorem disjoint_filter {s : Finset α} {p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] :
Disjoint (s.filter p) (s.filter q) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, p x → ¬q x := by
constructor <;> simp +contextual [disjoint_left]
theorem disjoint_filter_filter' (s t : Finset α)
{p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] (h : Disjoint p q) :
Disjoint (s.filter p) (t.filter q) := by
simp_rw [disjoint_left, mem_filter]
rintro a ⟨_, hp⟩ ⟨_, hq⟩
rw [Pi.disjoint_iff] at h
simpa [hp, hq] using h a
theorem disjoint_filter_filter_neg (s t : Finset α) (p : α → Prop)
[DecidablePred p] [∀ x, Decidable (¬p x)] :
Disjoint (s.filter p) (t.filter fun a => ¬p a) :=
disjoint_filter_filter' s t disjoint_compl_right
theorem filter_disj_union (s : Finset α) (t : Finset α) (h : Disjoint s t) :
filter p (disjUnion s t h) = (filter p s).disjUnion (filter p t) (disjoint_filter_filter h) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.filter_add _ _ _
theorem filter_cons {a : α} (s : Finset α) (ha : a ∉ s) :
filter p (cons a s ha) =
if p a then cons a (filter p s) ((mem_of_mem_filter _).mt ha) else filter p s := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos _ _ _ ha h]
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg _ _ _ ha h]
section
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem filter_union (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : (s₁ ∪ s₂).filter p = s₁.filter p ∪ s₂.filter p :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_filter, mem_union, or_and_right]
theorem filter_union_right (s : Finset α) : s.filter p ∪ s.filter q = s.filter fun x => p x ∨ q x :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_filter, mem_union, ← and_or_left]
theorem filter_mem_eq_inter {s t : Finset α} [∀ i, Decidable (i ∈ t)] :
(s.filter fun i => i ∈ t) = s ∩ t :=
ext fun i => by simp [mem_filter, mem_inter]
theorem filter_inter_distrib (s t : Finset α) : (s ∩ t).filter p = s.filter p ∩ t.filter p := by
ext
simp [mem_filter, mem_inter, and_assoc]
theorem filter_inter (s t : Finset α) : filter p s ∩ t = filter p (s ∩ t) := by
ext
simp only [mem_inter, mem_filter, and_right_comm]
theorem inter_filter (s t : Finset α) : s ∩ filter p t = filter p (s ∩ t) := by
rw [inter_comm, filter_inter, inter_comm]
theorem filter_insert (a : α) (s : Finset α) :
filter p (insert a s) = if p a then insert a (filter p s) else filter p s := by
ext x
split_ifs with h <;> by_cases h' : x = a <;> simp [h, h']
theorem filter_erase (a : α) (s : Finset α) : filter p (erase s a) = erase (filter p s) a := by
ext x
simp only [and_assoc, mem_filter, iff_self, mem_erase]
theorem filter_or (s : Finset α) : (s.filter fun a => p a ∨ q a) = s.filter p ∪ s.filter q :=
ext fun _ => by simp [mem_filter, mem_union, and_or_left]
theorem filter_and (s : Finset α) : (s.filter fun a => p a ∧ q a) = s.filter p ∩ s.filter q :=
ext fun _ => by simp [mem_filter, mem_inter, and_comm, and_left_comm, and_self_iff, and_assoc]
theorem filter_not (s : Finset α) : (s.filter fun a => ¬p a) = s \ s.filter p :=
ext fun a => by
simp only [Bool.decide_coe, Bool.not_eq_true', mem_filter, and_comm, mem_sdiff, not_and_or,
Bool.not_eq_true, and_or_left, and_not_self, or_false]
lemma filter_and_not (s : Finset α) (p q : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] :
s.filter (fun a ↦ p a ∧ ¬ q a) = s.filter p \ s.filter q := by
rw [filter_and, filter_not, ← inter_sdiff_assoc, inter_eq_left.2 (filter_subset _ _)]
theorem sdiff_eq_filter (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : s₁ \ s₂ = filter (· ∉ s₂) s₁ :=
ext fun _ => by simp [mem_sdiff, mem_filter]
theorem subset_union_elim {s : Finset α} {t₁ t₂ : Set α} (h : ↑s ⊆ t₁ ∪ t₂) :
∃ s₁ s₂ : Finset α, s₁ ∪ s₂ = s ∧ ↑s₁ ⊆ t₁ ∧ ↑s₂ ⊆ t₂ \ t₁ := by
classical
refine ⟨s.filter (· ∈ t₁), s.filter (· ∉ t₁), ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp [filter_union_right, em]
· intro x
simp
· intro x
simp only [not_not, coe_filter, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_diff, and_imp]
intro hx hx₂
exact ⟨Or.resolve_left (h hx) hx₂, hx₂⟩
-- This is not a good simp lemma, as it would prevent `Finset.mem_filter` from firing
-- on, e.g. `x ∈ s.filter (Eq b)`.
/-- After filtering out everything that does not equal a given value, at most that value remains.
This is equivalent to `filter_eq'` with the equality the other way.
-/
theorem filter_eq [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset β) (b : β) :
s.filter (Eq b) = ite (b ∈ s) {b} ∅ := by
split_ifs with h
· ext
simp only [mem_filter, mem_singleton, decide_eq_true_eq]
refine ⟨fun h => h.2.symm, ?_⟩
rintro rfl
exact ⟨h, rfl⟩
· ext
simp only [mem_filter, not_and, iff_false, not_mem_empty, decide_eq_true_eq]
rintro m rfl
exact h m
/-- After filtering out everything that does not equal a given value, at most that value remains.
This is equivalent to `filter_eq` with the equality the other way.
-/
theorem filter_eq' [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset β) (b : β) :
(s.filter fun a => a = b) = ite (b ∈ s) {b} ∅ :=
_root_.trans (filter_congr fun _ _ => by simp_rw [@eq_comm _ b]) (filter_eq s b)
theorem filter_ne [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset β) (b : β) :
(s.filter fun a => b ≠ a) = s.erase b := by
ext
simp only [mem_filter, mem_erase, Ne, decide_not, Bool.not_eq_true', decide_eq_false_iff_not]
tauto
theorem filter_ne' [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset β) (b : β) : (s.filter fun a => a ≠ b) = s.erase b :=
_root_.trans (filter_congr fun _ _ => by simp_rw [@ne_comm _ b]) (filter_ne s b)
theorem filter_union_filter_of_codisjoint (s : Finset α) (h : Codisjoint p q) :
s.filter p ∪ s.filter q = s :=
(filter_or _ _ _).symm.trans <| filter_true_of_mem fun x _ => h.top_le x trivial
theorem filter_union_filter_neg_eq [∀ x, Decidable (¬p x)] (s : Finset α) :
(s.filter p ∪ s.filter fun a => ¬p a) = s :=
filter_union_filter_of_codisjoint _ _ _ <| @codisjoint_hnot_right _ _ p
end
end Filter
/-! ### range -/
section Range
open Nat
variable {n m l : ℕ}
@[simp]
theorem range_filter_eq {n m : ℕ} : (range n).filter (· = m) = if m < n then {m} else ∅ := by
convert filter_eq (range n) m using 2
· ext
rw [eq_comm]
· simp
end Range
end Finset
/-! ### dedup on list and multiset -/
namespace Multiset
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t : Multiset α}
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_add (s t : Multiset α) : toFinset (s + t) = toFinset s ∪ toFinset t :=
Finset.ext <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_inter (s t : Multiset α) : toFinset (s ∩ t) = toFinset s ∩ toFinset t :=
Finset.ext <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_union (s t : Multiset α) : (s ∪ t).toFinset = s.toFinset ∪ t.toFinset := by
ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_eq_empty {m : Multiset α} : m.toFinset = ∅ ↔ m = 0 :=
Finset.val_inj.symm.trans Multiset.dedup_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_nonempty : s.toFinset.Nonempty ↔ s ≠ 0 := by
simp only [toFinset_eq_empty, Ne, Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected alias ⟨_, Aesop.toFinset_nonempty_of_ne⟩ := toFinset_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_filter (s : Multiset α) (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
Multiset.toFinset (s.filter p) = s.toFinset.filter p := by
ext; simp
end Multiset
namespace List
variable [DecidableEq α] {l l' : List α} {a : α} {f : α → β}
{s : Finset α} {t : Set β} {t' : Finset β}
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_union (l l' : List α) : (l ∪ l').toFinset = l.toFinset ∪ l'.toFinset := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_inter (l l' : List α) : (l ∩ l').toFinset = l.toFinset ∩ l'.toFinset := by
ext
simp
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.toFinset_nonempty_of_ne⟩ := toFinset_nonempty_iff
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_filter (s : List α) (p : α → Bool) :
(s.filter p).toFinset = s.toFinset.filter (p ·) := by
ext; simp [List.mem_filter]
end List
namespace Finset
section ToList
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_nil {s : Finset α} : s.toList = [] ↔ s = ∅ :=
Multiset.toList_eq_nil.trans val_eq_zero
theorem empty_toList {s : Finset α} : s.toList.isEmpty ↔ s = ∅ := by simp
@[simp]
theorem toList_empty : (∅ : Finset α).toList = [] :=
toList_eq_nil.mpr rfl
theorem Nonempty.toList_ne_nil {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nonempty) : s.toList ≠ [] :=
mt toList_eq_nil.mp hs.ne_empty
theorem Nonempty.not_empty_toList {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nonempty) : ¬s.toList.isEmpty :=
mt empty_toList.mp hs.ne_empty
end ToList
/-! ### choose -/
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : Finset α)
/-- Given a finset `l` and a predicate `p`, associate to a proof that there is a unique element of
`l` satisfying `p` this unique element, as an element of the corresponding subtype. -/
def chooseX (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : { a // a ∈ l ∧ p a } :=
Multiset.chooseX p l.val hp
/-- Given a finset `l` and a predicate `p`, associate to a proof that there is a unique element of
`l` satisfying `p` this unique element, as an element of the ambient type. -/
def choose (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : α :=
chooseX p l hp
theorem choose_spec (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(chooseX p l hp).property
theorem choose_mem (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).1
theorem choose_property (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).2
end Choose
end Finset
namespace Equiv
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t : Finset α}
open Finset
/-- The disjoint union of finsets is a sum -/
def Finset.union (s t : Finset α) (h : Disjoint s t) :
s ⊕ t ≃ (s ∪ t : Finset α) :=
Equiv.setCongr (coe_union _ _) |>.trans (Equiv.Set.union (disjoint_coe.mpr h)) |>.symm
@[simp]
theorem Finset.union_symm_inl (h : Disjoint s t) (x : s) :
Equiv.Finset.union s t h (Sum.inl x) = ⟨x, Finset.mem_union.mpr <| Or.inl x.2⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Finset.union_symm_inr (h : Disjoint s t) (y : t) :
Equiv.Finset.union s t h (Sum.inr y) = ⟨y, Finset.mem_union.mpr <| Or.inr y.2⟩ :=
rfl
/-- The type of dependent functions on the disjoint union of finsets `s ∪ t` is equivalent to the
type of pairs of functions on `s` and on `t`. This is similar to `Equiv.sumPiEquivProdPi`. -/
def piFinsetUnion {ι} [DecidableEq ι] (α : ι → Type*) {s t : Finset ι} (h : Disjoint s t) :
((∀ i : s, α i) × ∀ i : t, α i) ≃ ∀ i : (s ∪ t : Finset ι), α i :=
let e := Equiv.Finset.union s t h
sumPiEquivProdPi (fun b ↦ α (e b)) |>.symm.trans (.piCongrLeft (fun i : ↥(s ∪ t) ↦ α i) e)
/-- A finset is equivalent to its coercion as a set. -/
def _root_.Finset.equivToSet (s : Finset α) : s ≃ s.toSet where
toFun a := ⟨a.1, mem_coe.2 a.2⟩
invFun a := ⟨a.1, mem_coe.1 a.2⟩
left_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl
right_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl
end Equiv
namespace Multiset
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
lemma toFinset_replicate (n : ℕ) (a : α) :
(replicate n a).toFinset = if n = 0 then ∅ else {a} := by
ext x
simp only [mem_toFinset, Finset.mem_singleton, mem_replicate]
split_ifs with hn <;> simp [hn]
end Multiset
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Basic.lean | 2,766 | 2,767 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Michael Jendrusch. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Jendrusch, Kim Morrison, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Category
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.FullyFaithful
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Products.Basic
/-!
# (Lax) monoidal functors
A lax monoidal functor `F` between monoidal categories `C` and `D`
is a functor between the underlying categories equipped with morphisms
* `ε : 𝟙_ D ⟶ F.obj (𝟙_ C)` (called the unit morphism)
* `μ X Y : (F.obj X) ⊗ (F.obj Y) ⟶ F.obj (X ⊗ Y)` (called the tensorator, or strength).
satisfying various axioms. This is implemented as a typeclass `F.LaxMonoidal`.
Similarly, we define the typeclass `F.OplaxMonoidal`. For these oplax monoidal functors,
we have similar data `η` and `δ`, but with morphisms in the opposite direction.
A monoidal functor (`F.Monoidal`) is defined here as the combination of `F.LaxMonoidal`
and `F.OplaxMonoidal`, with the additional conditions that `ε`/`η` and `μ`/`δ` are
inverse isomorphisms.
We show that the composition of (lax) monoidal functors gives a (lax) monoidal functor.
See `Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.NaturalTransformation` for monoidal natural transformations.
We show in `Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Mon_` that lax monoidal functors take monoid objects
to monoid objects.
## References
See <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0FFL>.
-/
universe v₁ v₂ v₃ v₁' u₁ u₂ u₃ u₁'
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Functor MonoidalCategory
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] [MonoidalCategory.{v₁} C]
{D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D] [MonoidalCategory.{v₂} D]
{E : Type u₃} [Category.{v₃} E] [MonoidalCategory.{v₃} E]
{C' : Type u₁'} [Category.{v₁'} C']
(F : C ⥤ D) (G : D ⥤ E)
namespace Functor
-- The direction of `left_unitality` and `right_unitality` as simp lemmas may look strange:
-- remember the rule of thumb that component indices of natural transformations
-- "weigh more" than structural maps.
-- (However by this argument `associativity` is currently stated backwards!)
/-- A functor `F : C ⥤ D` between monoidal categories is lax monoidal if it is
equipped with morphisms `ε : 𝟙_ D ⟶ F.obj (𝟙_ C)` and `μ X Y : F.obj X ⊗ F.obj Y ⟶ F.obj (X ⊗ Y)`,
satisfying the appropriate coherences. -/
@[ext]
class LaxMonoidal where
/-- unit morphism -/
ε' : 𝟙_ D ⟶ F.obj (𝟙_ C)
/-- tensorator -/
μ' : ∀ X Y : C, F.obj X ⊗ F.obj Y ⟶ F.obj (X ⊗ Y)
μ'_natural_left :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (X' : C),
F.map f ▷ F.obj X' ≫ μ' Y X' = μ' X X' ≫ F.map (f ▷ X') := by
aesop_cat
μ'_natural_right :
∀ {X Y : C} (X' : C) (f : X ⟶ Y) ,
F.obj X' ◁ F.map f ≫ μ' X' Y = μ' X' X ≫ F.map (X' ◁ f) := by
aesop_cat
/-- associativity of the tensorator -/
associativity' :
∀ X Y Z : C,
μ' X Y ▷ F.obj Z ≫ μ' (X ⊗ Y) Z ≫ F.map (α_ X Y Z).hom =
(α_ (F.obj X) (F.obj Y) (F.obj Z)).hom ≫ F.obj X ◁ μ' Y Z ≫ μ' X (Y ⊗ Z) := by
aesop_cat
-- unitality
left_unitality' :
∀ X : C, (λ_ (F.obj X)).hom = ε' ▷ F.obj X ≫ μ' (𝟙_ C) X ≫ F.map (λ_ X).hom := by
aesop_cat
right_unitality' :
∀ X : C, (ρ_ (F.obj X)).hom = F.obj X ◁ ε' ≫ μ' X (𝟙_ C) ≫ F.map (ρ_ X).hom := by
aesop_cat
namespace LaxMonoidal
section
variable [F.LaxMonoidal]
/-- the unit morphism of a lax monoidal functor -/
def ε : 𝟙_ D ⟶ F.obj (𝟙_ C) := ε'
/-- the tensorator of a lax monoidal functor -/
def μ (X Y : C) : F.obj X ⊗ F.obj Y ⟶ F.obj (X ⊗ Y) := μ' X Y
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma μ_natural_left {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (X' : C) :
F.map f ▷ F.obj X' ≫ μ F Y X' = μ F X X' ≫ F.map (f ▷ X') := by
apply μ'_natural_left
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma μ_natural_right {X Y : C} (X' : C) (f : X ⟶ Y) :
F.obj X' ◁ F.map f ≫ μ F X' Y = μ F X' X ≫ F.map (X' ◁ f) := by
apply μ'_natural_right
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma associativity (X Y Z : C) :
μ F X Y ▷ F.obj Z ≫ μ F (X ⊗ Y) Z ≫ F.map (α_ X Y Z).hom =
(α_ (F.obj X) (F.obj Y) (F.obj Z)).hom ≫ F.obj X ◁ μ F Y Z ≫ μ F X (Y ⊗ Z) := by
apply associativity'
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma left_unitality (X : C) :
(λ_ (F.obj X)).hom = ε F ▷ F.obj X ≫ μ F (𝟙_ C) X ≫ F.map (λ_ X).hom := by
apply left_unitality'
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma right_unitality (X : C) :
(ρ_ (F.obj X)).hom = F.obj X ◁ ε F ≫ μ F X (𝟙_ C) ≫ F.map (ρ_ X).hom := by
apply right_unitality'
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem μ_natural {X Y X' Y' : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X' ⟶ Y') :
(F.map f ⊗ F.map g) ≫ μ F Y Y' = μ F X X' ≫ F.map (f ⊗ g) := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem left_unitality_inv (X : C) :
(λ_ (F.obj X)).inv ≫ ε F ▷ F.obj X ≫ μ F (𝟙_ C) X = F.map (λ_ X).inv := by
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq, left_unitality, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, ← F.map_comp,
Iso.hom_inv_id, F.map_id, comp_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem right_unitality_inv (X : C) :
(ρ_ (F.obj X)).inv ≫ F.obj X ◁ ε F ≫ μ F X (𝟙_ C) = F.map (ρ_ X).inv := by
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq, right_unitality, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, ← F.map_comp,
Iso.hom_inv_id, F.map_id, comp_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem associativity_inv (X Y Z : C) :
F.obj X ◁ μ F Y Z ≫ μ F X (Y ⊗ Z) ≫ F.map (α_ X Y Z).inv =
(α_ (F.obj X) (F.obj Y) (F.obj Z)).inv ≫ μ F X Y ▷ F.obj Z ≫ μ F (X ⊗ Y) Z := by
rw [Iso.eq_inv_comp, ← associativity_assoc, ← F.map_comp, Iso.hom_inv_id,
F.map_id, comp_id]
end
section
variable {F}
/- unit morphism -/
(ε' : 𝟙_ D ⟶ F.obj (𝟙_ C))
/- tensorator -/
(μ' : ∀ X Y : C, F.obj X ⊗ F.obj Y ⟶ F.obj (X ⊗ Y))
(μ'_natural :
∀ {X Y X' Y' : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X' ⟶ Y'),
(F.map f ⊗ F.map g) ≫ μ' Y Y' = μ' X X' ≫ F.map (f ⊗ g) := by
aesop_cat)
/- associativity of the tensorator -/
(associativity' :
∀ X Y Z : C,
(μ' X Y ⊗ 𝟙 (F.obj Z)) ≫ μ' (X ⊗ Y) Z ≫ F.map (α_ X Y Z).hom =
(α_ (F.obj X) (F.obj Y) (F.obj Z)).hom ≫ (𝟙 (F.obj X) ⊗ μ' Y Z) ≫ μ' X (Y ⊗ Z) := by
aesop_cat)
/- unitality -/
(left_unitality' :
∀ X : C, (λ_ (F.obj X)).hom = (ε' ⊗ 𝟙 (F.obj X)) ≫ μ' (𝟙_ C) X ≫ F.map (λ_ X).hom := by
aesop_cat)
(right_unitality' :
∀ X : C, (ρ_ (F.obj X)).hom = (𝟙 (F.obj X) ⊗ ε') ≫ μ' X (𝟙_ C) ≫ F.map (ρ_ X).hom := by
aesop_cat)
/--
A constructor for lax monoidal functors whose axioms are described by `tensorHom` instead of
`whiskerLeft` and `whiskerRight`.
-/
def ofTensorHom : F.LaxMonoidal where
ε' := ε'
μ' := μ'
μ'_natural_left := fun f X' => by
simp_rw [← tensorHom_id, ← F.map_id, μ'_natural]
μ'_natural_right := fun X' f => by
simp_rw [← id_tensorHom, ← F.map_id, μ'_natural]
associativity' := fun X Y Z => by
simp_rw [← tensorHom_id, ← id_tensorHom, associativity']
left_unitality' := fun X => by
simp_rw [← tensorHom_id, left_unitality']
right_unitality' := fun X => by
simp_rw [← id_tensorHom, right_unitality']
lemma ofTensorHom_ε :
letI := (ofTensorHom ε' μ' μ'_natural associativity' left_unitality' right_unitality')
ε F = ε' := rfl
lemma ofTensorHom_μ :
letI := (ofTensorHom ε' μ' μ'_natural associativity' left_unitality' right_unitality')
μ F = μ' := rfl
end
instance id : (𝟭 C).LaxMonoidal where
ε' := 𝟙 _
μ' _ _ := 𝟙 _
@[simp]
lemma id_ε : ε (𝟭 C) = 𝟙 _ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma id_μ (X Y : C) : μ (𝟭 C) X Y = 𝟙 _ := rfl
section
variable [F.LaxMonoidal] [G.LaxMonoidal]
instance comp : (F ⋙ G).LaxMonoidal where
ε' := ε G ≫ G.map (ε F)
μ' X Y := μ G _ _ ≫ G.map (μ F X Y)
μ'_natural_left _ _ := by
simp_rw [comp_obj, F.comp_map, μ_natural_left_assoc, assoc, ← G.map_comp, μ_natural_left]
μ'_natural_right _ _ := by
simp_rw [comp_obj, F.comp_map, μ_natural_right_assoc, assoc, ← G.map_comp, μ_natural_right]
associativity' _ _ _ := by
dsimp
simp_rw [comp_whiskerRight, assoc, μ_natural_left_assoc, MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp,
assoc, μ_natural_right_assoc, ← associativity_assoc, ← G.map_comp, associativity]
@[simp]
lemma comp_ε : ε (F ⋙ G) = ε G ≫ G.map (ε F) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma comp_μ (X Y : C) : μ (F ⋙ G) X Y = μ G _ _ ≫ G.map (μ F X Y) := rfl
end
end LaxMonoidal
/-- A functor `F : C ⥤ D` between monoidal categories is oplax monoidal if it is
equipped with morphisms `η : F.obj (𝟙_ C) ⟶ 𝟙 _D` and `δ X Y : F.obj (X ⊗ Y) ⟶ F.obj X ⊗ F.obj Y`,
satisfying the appropriate coherences. -/
@[ext]
class OplaxMonoidal where
/-- counit morphism -/
η' : F.obj (𝟙_ C) ⟶ 𝟙_ D
/-- cotensorator -/
| δ' : ∀ X Y : C, F.obj (X ⊗ Y) ⟶ F.obj X ⊗ F.obj Y
δ'_natural_left :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (X' : C),
δ' X X' ≫ F.map f ▷ F.obj X' = F.map (f ▷ X') ≫ δ' Y X' := by
aesop_cat
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Functor.lean | 249 | 253 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Andrew Zipperer, Haitao Zhang, Minchao Wu, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Restrict
/-!
# Functions over sets
This file contains basic results on the following predicates of functions and sets:
* `Set.EqOn f₁ f₂ s` : functions `f₁` and `f₂` are equal at every point of `s`;
* `Set.MapsTo f s t` : `f` sends every point of `s` to a point of `t`;
* `Set.InjOn f s` : restriction of `f` to `s` is injective;
* `Set.SurjOn f s t` : every point in `s` has a preimage in `s`;
* `Set.BijOn f s t` : `f` is a bijection between `s` and `t`;
* `Set.LeftInvOn f' f s` : for every `x ∈ s` we have `f' (f x) = x`;
* `Set.RightInvOn f' f t` : for every `y ∈ t` we have `f (f' y) = y`;
* `Set.InvOn f' f s t` : `f'` is a two-side inverse of `f` on `s` and `t`, i.e.
we have `Set.LeftInvOn f' f s` and `Set.RightInvOn f' f t`.
-/
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι : Sort*} {π : α → Type*}
open Equiv Equiv.Perm Function
namespace Set
/-! ### Equality on a set -/
section equality
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {f₁ f₂ f₃ : α → β} {g : β → γ} {a : α}
/-- This lemma exists for use by `aesop` as a forward rule. -/
@[aesop safe forward]
lemma EqOn.eq_of_mem (h : s.EqOn f₁ f₂) (ha : a ∈ s) : f₁ a = f₂ a :=
h ha
@[simp]
theorem eqOn_empty (f₁ f₂ : α → β) : EqOn f₁ f₂ ∅ := fun _ => False.elim
@[simp]
theorem eqOn_singleton : Set.EqOn f₁ f₂ {a} ↔ f₁ a = f₂ a := by
simp [Set.EqOn]
@[simp]
theorem eqOn_univ (f₁ f₂ : α → β) : EqOn f₁ f₂ univ ↔ f₁ = f₂ := by
simp [EqOn, funext_iff]
@[symm]
theorem EqOn.symm (h : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : EqOn f₂ f₁ s := fun _ hx => (h hx).symm
theorem eqOn_comm : EqOn f₁ f₂ s ↔ EqOn f₂ f₁ s :=
⟨EqOn.symm, EqOn.symm⟩
-- This can not be tagged as `@[refl]` with the current argument order.
-- See note below at `EqOn.trans`.
theorem eqOn_refl (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : EqOn f f s := fun _ _ => rfl
-- Note: this was formerly tagged with `@[trans]`, and although the `trans` attribute accepted it
-- the `trans` tactic could not use it.
-- An update to the trans tactic coming in https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/7014 will reject this attribute.
-- It can be restored by changing the argument order from `EqOn f₁ f₂ s` to `EqOn s f₁ f₂`.
-- This change will be made separately: [zulip](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/Reordering.20arguments.20of.20.60Set.2EEqOn.60/near/390467581).
theorem EqOn.trans (h₁ : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) (h₂ : EqOn f₂ f₃ s) : EqOn f₁ f₃ s := fun _ hx =>
(h₁ hx).trans (h₂ hx)
theorem EqOn.image_eq (heq : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : f₁ '' s = f₂ '' s :=
image_congr heq
/-- Variant of `EqOn.image_eq`, for one function being the identity. -/
theorem EqOn.image_eq_self {f : α → α} (h : Set.EqOn f id s) : f '' s = s := by
rw [h.image_eq, image_id]
theorem EqOn.inter_preimage_eq (heq : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) (t : Set β) : s ∩ f₁ ⁻¹' t = s ∩ f₂ ⁻¹' t :=
ext fun x => and_congr_right_iff.2 fun hx => by rw [mem_preimage, mem_preimage, heq hx]
theorem EqOn.mono (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hf : EqOn f₁ f₂ s₂) : EqOn f₁ f₂ s₁ := fun _ hx => hf (hs hx)
@[simp]
theorem eqOn_union : EqOn f₁ f₂ (s₁ ∪ s₂) ↔ EqOn f₁ f₂ s₁ ∧ EqOn f₁ f₂ s₂ :=
forall₂_or_left
theorem EqOn.union (h₁ : EqOn f₁ f₂ s₁) (h₂ : EqOn f₁ f₂ s₂) : EqOn f₁ f₂ (s₁ ∪ s₂) :=
eqOn_union.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
theorem EqOn.comp_left (h : s.EqOn f₁ f₂) : s.EqOn (g ∘ f₁) (g ∘ f₂) := fun _ ha =>
congr_arg _ <| h ha
@[simp]
theorem eqOn_range {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → α} {g₁ g₂ : α → β} :
EqOn g₁ g₂ (range f) ↔ g₁ ∘ f = g₂ ∘ f :=
forall_mem_range.trans <| funext_iff.symm
alias ⟨EqOn.comp_eq, _⟩ := eqOn_range
end equality
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {t t₁ t₂ : Set β} {p : Set γ} {f f₁ f₂ : α → β} {g g₁ g₂ : β → γ}
{f' f₁' f₂' : β → α} {g' : γ → β} {a : α} {b : β}
section MapsTo
theorem mapsTo' : MapsTo f s t ↔ f '' s ⊆ t :=
image_subset_iff.symm
theorem mapsTo_prodMap_diagonal : MapsTo (Prod.map f f) (diagonal α) (diagonal β) :=
diagonal_subset_iff.2 fun _ => rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-18")]
alias mapsTo_prod_map_diagonal := mapsTo_prodMap_diagonal
theorem MapsTo.subset_preimage (hf : MapsTo f s t) : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t := hf
theorem mapsTo_iff_subset_preimage : MapsTo f s t ↔ s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_singleton {x : α} : MapsTo f {x} t ↔ f x ∈ t :=
singleton_subset_iff
theorem mapsTo_empty (f : α → β) (t : Set β) : MapsTo f ∅ t :=
empty_subset _
@[simp] theorem mapsTo_empty_iff : MapsTo f s ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp [mapsTo', subset_empty_iff]
/-- If `f` maps `s` to `t` and `s` is non-empty, `t` is non-empty. -/
theorem MapsTo.nonempty (h : MapsTo f s t) (hs : s.Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
(hs.image f).mono (mapsTo'.mp h)
theorem MapsTo.image_subset (h : MapsTo f s t) : f '' s ⊆ t :=
mapsTo'.1 h
theorem MapsTo.congr (h₁ : MapsTo f₁ s t) (h : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : MapsTo f₂ s t := fun _ hx =>
h hx ▸ h₁ hx
theorem EqOn.comp_right (hg : t.EqOn g₁ g₂) (hf : s.MapsTo f t) : s.EqOn (g₁ ∘ f) (g₂ ∘ f) :=
fun _ ha => hg <| hf ha
theorem EqOn.mapsTo_iff (H : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : MapsTo f₁ s t ↔ MapsTo f₂ s t :=
⟨fun h => h.congr H, fun h => h.congr H.symm⟩
theorem MapsTo.comp (h₁ : MapsTo g t p) (h₂ : MapsTo f s t) : MapsTo (g ∘ f) s p := fun _ h =>
h₁ (h₂ h)
theorem mapsTo_id (s : Set α) : MapsTo id s s := fun _ => id
theorem MapsTo.iterate {f : α → α} {s : Set α} (h : MapsTo f s s) : ∀ n, MapsTo f^[n] s s
| 0 => fun _ => id
| n + 1 => (MapsTo.iterate h n).comp h
theorem MapsTo.iterate_restrict {f : α → α} {s : Set α} (h : MapsTo f s s) (n : ℕ) :
(h.restrict f s s)^[n] = (h.iterate n).restrict _ _ _ := by
funext x
rw [Subtype.ext_iff, MapsTo.val_restrict_apply]
induction n generalizing x with
| zero => rfl
| succ n ihn => simp [Nat.iterate, ihn]
lemma mapsTo_of_subsingleton' [Subsingleton β] (f : α → β) (h : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty) :
MapsTo f s t :=
fun a ha ↦ Subsingleton.mem_iff_nonempty.2 <| h ⟨a, ha⟩
lemma mapsTo_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (f : α → α) (s : Set α) : MapsTo f s s :=
mapsTo_of_subsingleton' _ id
theorem MapsTo.mono (hf : MapsTo f s₁ t₁) (hs : s₂ ⊆ s₁) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : MapsTo f s₂ t₂ :=
fun _ hx => ht (hf <| hs hx)
theorem MapsTo.mono_left (hf : MapsTo f s₁ t) (hs : s₂ ⊆ s₁) : MapsTo f s₂ t := fun _ hx =>
hf (hs hx)
theorem MapsTo.mono_right (hf : MapsTo f s t₁) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : MapsTo f s t₂ := fun _ hx =>
ht (hf hx)
theorem MapsTo.union_union (h₁ : MapsTo f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : MapsTo f s₂ t₂) :
MapsTo f (s₁ ∪ s₂) (t₁ ∪ t₂) := fun _ hx =>
hx.elim (fun hx => Or.inl <| h₁ hx) fun hx => Or.inr <| h₂ hx
theorem MapsTo.union (h₁ : MapsTo f s₁ t) (h₂ : MapsTo f s₂ t) : MapsTo f (s₁ ∪ s₂) t :=
union_self t ▸ h₁.union_union h₂
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_union : MapsTo f (s₁ ∪ s₂) t ↔ MapsTo f s₁ t ∧ MapsTo f s₂ t :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨h.mono subset_union_left (Subset.refl t),
h.mono subset_union_right (Subset.refl t)⟩,
fun h => h.1.union h.2⟩
theorem MapsTo.inter (h₁ : MapsTo f s t₁) (h₂ : MapsTo f s t₂) : MapsTo f s (t₁ ∩ t₂) := fun _ hx =>
⟨h₁ hx, h₂ hx⟩
lemma MapsTo.insert (h : MapsTo f s t) (x : α) : MapsTo f (insert x s) (insert (f x) t) := by
simpa [← singleton_union] using h.mono_right subset_union_right
theorem MapsTo.inter_inter (h₁ : MapsTo f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : MapsTo f s₂ t₂) :
MapsTo f (s₁ ∩ s₂) (t₁ ∩ t₂) := fun _ hx => ⟨h₁ hx.1, h₂ hx.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_inter : MapsTo f s (t₁ ∩ t₂) ↔ MapsTo f s t₁ ∧ MapsTo f s t₂ :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨h.mono (Subset.refl s) inter_subset_left,
h.mono (Subset.refl s) inter_subset_right⟩,
fun h => h.1.inter h.2⟩
theorem mapsTo_univ (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : MapsTo f s univ := fun _ _ => trivial
theorem mapsTo_range (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : MapsTo f s (range f) :=
(mapsTo_image f s).mono (Subset.refl s) (image_subset_range _ _)
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_image_iff {f : α → β} {g : γ → α} {s : Set γ} {t : Set β} :
MapsTo f (g '' s) t ↔ MapsTo (f ∘ g) s t :=
⟨fun h c hc => h ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩, fun h _ ⟨_, hc⟩ => hc.2 ▸ h hc.1⟩
lemma MapsTo.comp_left (g : β → γ) (hf : MapsTo f s t) : MapsTo (g ∘ f) s (g '' t) :=
fun x hx ↦ ⟨f x, hf hx, rfl⟩
lemma MapsTo.comp_right {s : Set β} {t : Set γ} (hg : MapsTo g s t) (f : α → β) :
MapsTo (g ∘ f) (f ⁻¹' s) t := fun _ hx ↦ hg hx
@[simp]
lemma mapsTo_univ_iff : MapsTo f univ t ↔ ∀ x, f x ∈ t :=
⟨fun h _ => h (mem_univ _), fun h x _ => h x⟩
@[simp]
lemma mapsTo_range_iff {g : ι → α} : MapsTo f (range g) t ↔ ∀ i, f (g i) ∈ t :=
forall_mem_range
theorem MapsTo.mem_iff (h : MapsTo f s t) (hc : MapsTo f sᶜ tᶜ) {x} : f x ∈ t ↔ x ∈ s :=
⟨fun ht => by_contra fun hs => hc hs ht, fun hx => h hx⟩
end MapsTo
/-! ### Injectivity on a set -/
section injOn
theorem Subsingleton.injOn (hs : s.Subsingleton) (f : α → β) : InjOn f s := fun _ hx _ hy _ =>
hs hx hy
@[simp]
theorem injOn_empty (f : α → β) : InjOn f ∅ :=
subsingleton_empty.injOn f
@[simp]
theorem injOn_singleton (f : α → β) (a : α) : InjOn f {a} :=
subsingleton_singleton.injOn f
@[simp] lemma injOn_pair {b : α} : InjOn f {a, b} ↔ f a = f b → a = b := by unfold InjOn; aesop
theorem InjOn.eq_iff {x y} (h : InjOn f s) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : f x = f y ↔ x = y :=
⟨h hx hy, fun h => h ▸ rfl⟩
theorem InjOn.ne_iff {x y} (h : InjOn f s) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : f x ≠ f y ↔ x ≠ y :=
(h.eq_iff hx hy).not
alias ⟨_, InjOn.ne⟩ := InjOn.ne_iff
theorem InjOn.congr (h₁ : InjOn f₁ s) (h : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : InjOn f₂ s := fun _ hx _ hy =>
h hx ▸ h hy ▸ h₁ hx hy
theorem EqOn.injOn_iff (H : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : InjOn f₁ s ↔ InjOn f₂ s :=
⟨fun h => h.congr H, fun h => h.congr H.symm⟩
theorem InjOn.mono (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : InjOn f s₂) : InjOn f s₁ := fun _ hx _ hy H =>
ht (h hx) (h hy) H
theorem injOn_union (h : Disjoint s₁ s₂) :
InjOn f (s₁ ∪ s₂) ↔ InjOn f s₁ ∧ InjOn f s₂ ∧ ∀ x ∈ s₁, ∀ y ∈ s₂, f x ≠ f y := by
refine ⟨fun H => ⟨H.mono subset_union_left, H.mono subset_union_right, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· intro x hx y hy hxy
obtain rfl : x = y := H (Or.inl hx) (Or.inr hy) hxy
exact h.le_bot ⟨hx, hy⟩
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂, h₁₂⟩
rintro x (hx | hx) y (hy | hy) hxy
exacts [h₁ hx hy hxy, (h₁₂ _ hx _ hy hxy).elim, (h₁₂ _ hy _ hx hxy.symm).elim, h₂ hx hy hxy]
theorem injOn_insert {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (has : a ∉ s) :
Set.InjOn f (insert a s) ↔ Set.InjOn f s ∧ f a ∉ f '' s := by
rw [← union_singleton, injOn_union (disjoint_singleton_right.2 has)]
simp
theorem injective_iff_injOn_univ : Injective f ↔ InjOn f univ :=
⟨fun h _ _ _ _ hxy => h hxy, fun h _ _ heq => h trivial trivial heq⟩
theorem injOn_of_injective (h : Injective f) {s : Set α} : InjOn f s := fun _ _ _ _ hxy => h hxy
alias _root_.Function.Injective.injOn := injOn_of_injective
-- A specialization of `injOn_of_injective` for `Subtype.val`.
theorem injOn_subtype_val {s : Set { x // p x }} : Set.InjOn Subtype.val s :=
Subtype.coe_injective.injOn
lemma injOn_id (s : Set α) : InjOn id s := injective_id.injOn
theorem InjOn.comp (hg : InjOn g t) (hf : InjOn f s) (h : MapsTo f s t) : InjOn (g ∘ f) s :=
fun _ hx _ hy heq => hf hx hy <| hg (h hx) (h hy) heq
lemma InjOn.of_comp (h : InjOn (g ∘ f) s) : InjOn f s :=
fun _ hx _ hy heq ↦ h hx hy (by simp [heq])
lemma InjOn.image_of_comp (h : InjOn (g ∘ f) s) : InjOn g (f '' s) :=
forall_mem_image.2 fun _x hx ↦ forall_mem_image.2 fun _y hy heq ↦ congr_arg f <| h hx hy heq
lemma InjOn.comp_iff (hf : InjOn f s) : InjOn (g ∘ f) s ↔ InjOn g (f '' s) :=
⟨image_of_comp, fun h ↦ InjOn.comp h hf <| mapsTo_image f s⟩
lemma InjOn.iterate {f : α → α} {s : Set α} (h : InjOn f s) (hf : MapsTo f s s) :
∀ n, InjOn f^[n] s
| 0 => injOn_id _
| (n + 1) => (h.iterate hf n).comp h hf
lemma injOn_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : InjOn f s :=
(injective_of_subsingleton _).injOn
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.injOn_range (h : Injective (g ∘ f)) : InjOn g (range f) := by
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩ _ ⟨y, rfl⟩ H
exact congr_arg f (h H)
theorem _root_.Set.InjOn.injective_iff (s : Set β) (h : InjOn g s) (hs : range f ⊆ s) :
Injective (g ∘ f) ↔ Injective f :=
⟨(·.of_comp), fun h _ ↦ by aesop⟩
theorem exists_injOn_iff_injective [Nonempty β] :
(∃ f : α → β, InjOn f s) ↔ ∃ f : s → β, Injective f :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hf⟩ => ⟨_, hf.injective⟩,
fun ⟨f, hf⟩ => by
lift f to α → β using trivial
exact ⟨f, injOn_iff_injective.2 hf⟩⟩
theorem injOn_preimage {B : Set (Set β)} (hB : B ⊆ 𝒫 range f) : InjOn (preimage f) B :=
fun _ hs _ ht hst => (preimage_eq_preimage' (hB hs) (hB ht)).1 hst
theorem InjOn.mem_of_mem_image {x} (hf : InjOn f s) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s) (h : x ∈ s) (h₁ : f x ∈ f '' s₁) :
x ∈ s₁ :=
let ⟨_, h', Eq⟩ := h₁
hf (hs h') h Eq ▸ h'
theorem InjOn.mem_image_iff {x} (hf : InjOn f s) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
f x ∈ f '' s₁ ↔ x ∈ s₁ :=
⟨hf.mem_of_mem_image hs hx, mem_image_of_mem f⟩
theorem InjOn.preimage_image_inter (hf : InjOn f s) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s) : f ⁻¹' (f '' s₁) ∩ s = s₁ :=
ext fun _ => ⟨fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => hf.mem_of_mem_image hs h₂ h₁, fun h => ⟨mem_image_of_mem _ h, hs h⟩⟩
theorem EqOn.cancel_left (h : s.EqOn (g ∘ f₁) (g ∘ f₂)) (hg : t.InjOn g) (hf₁ : s.MapsTo f₁ t)
(hf₂ : s.MapsTo f₂ t) : s.EqOn f₁ f₂ := fun _ ha => hg (hf₁ ha) (hf₂ ha) (h ha)
theorem InjOn.cancel_left (hg : t.InjOn g) (hf₁ : s.MapsTo f₁ t) (hf₂ : s.MapsTo f₂ t) :
s.EqOn (g ∘ f₁) (g ∘ f₂) ↔ s.EqOn f₁ f₂ :=
⟨fun h => h.cancel_left hg hf₁ hf₂, EqOn.comp_left⟩
lemma InjOn.image_inter {s t u : Set α} (hf : u.InjOn f) (hs : s ⊆ u) (ht : t ⊆ u) :
f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t := by
apply Subset.antisymm (image_inter_subset _ _ _)
intro x ⟨⟨y, ys, hy⟩, ⟨z, zt, hz⟩⟩
have : y = z := by
apply hf (hs ys) (ht zt)
rwa [← hz] at hy
rw [← this] at zt
exact ⟨y, ⟨ys, zt⟩, hy⟩
lemma InjOn.image (h : s.InjOn f) : s.powerset.InjOn (image f) :=
fun s₁ hs₁ s₂ hs₂ h' ↦ by rw [← h.preimage_image_inter hs₁, h', h.preimage_image_inter hs₂]
theorem InjOn.image_eq_image_iff (h : s.InjOn f) (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ s) (h₂ : s₂ ⊆ s) :
f '' s₁ = f '' s₂ ↔ s₁ = s₂ :=
h.image.eq_iff h₁ h₂
lemma InjOn.image_subset_image_iff (h : s.InjOn f) (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ s) (h₂ : s₂ ⊆ s) :
f '' s₁ ⊆ f '' s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ := by
refine ⟨fun h' ↦ ?_, image_subset _⟩
rw [← h.preimage_image_inter h₁, ← h.preimage_image_inter h₂]
exact inter_subset_inter_left _ (preimage_mono h')
lemma InjOn.image_ssubset_image_iff (h : s.InjOn f) (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ s) (h₂ : s₂ ⊆ s) :
f '' s₁ ⊂ f '' s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ := by
simp_rw [ssubset_def, h.image_subset_image_iff h₁ h₂, h.image_subset_image_iff h₂ h₁]
-- TODO: can this move to a better place?
theorem _root_.Disjoint.image {s t u : Set α} {f : α → β} (h : Disjoint s t) (hf : u.InjOn f)
(hs : s ⊆ u) (ht : t ⊆ u) : Disjoint (f '' s) (f '' t) := by
rw [disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty] at h ⊢
rw [← hf.image_inter hs ht, h, image_empty]
lemma InjOn.image_diff {t : Set α} (h : s.InjOn f) : f '' (s \ t) = f '' s \ f '' (s ∩ t) := by
refine subset_antisymm (subset_diff.2 ⟨image_subset f diff_subset, ?_⟩)
(diff_subset_iff.2 (by rw [← image_union, inter_union_diff]))
exact Disjoint.image disjoint_sdiff_inter h diff_subset inter_subset_left
lemma InjOn.image_diff_subset {f : α → β} {t : Set α} (h : InjOn f s) (hst : t ⊆ s) :
f '' (s \ t) = f '' s \ f '' t := by
rw [h.image_diff, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right hst]
alias image_diff_of_injOn := InjOn.image_diff_subset
theorem InjOn.imageFactorization_injective (h : InjOn f s) :
Injective (s.imageFactorization f) :=
fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ h' ↦ by simpa [imageFactorization, h.eq_iff hx hy] using h'
@[simp] theorem imageFactorization_injective_iff : Injective (s.imageFactorization f) ↔ InjOn f s :=
⟨fun h x hx y hy _ ↦ by simpa using @h ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ (by simpa [imageFactorization]),
InjOn.imageFactorization_injective⟩
end injOn
section graphOn
variable {x : α × β}
lemma graphOn_univ_inj {g : α → β} : univ.graphOn f = univ.graphOn g ↔ f = g := by simp
lemma graphOn_univ_injective : Injective (univ.graphOn : (α → β) → Set (α × β)) :=
fun _f _g ↦ graphOn_univ_inj.1
lemma exists_eq_graphOn_image_fst [Nonempty β] {s : Set (α × β)} :
(∃ f : α → β, s = graphOn f (Prod.fst '' s)) ↔ InjOn Prod.fst s := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨f, hf⟩
rw [hf]
exact InjOn.image_of_comp <| injOn_id _
· have : ∀ x ∈ Prod.fst '' s, ∃ y, (x, y) ∈ s := forall_mem_image.2 fun (x, y) h ↦ ⟨y, h⟩
choose! f hf using this
rw [forall_mem_image] at hf
use f
rw [graphOn, image_image, EqOn.image_eq_self]
exact fun x hx ↦ h (hf hx) hx rfl
lemma exists_eq_graphOn [Nonempty β] {s : Set (α × β)} :
(∃ f t, s = graphOn f t) ↔ InjOn Prod.fst s :=
.trans ⟨fun ⟨f, t, hs⟩ ↦ ⟨f, by rw [hs, image_fst_graphOn]⟩, fun ⟨f, hf⟩ ↦ ⟨f, _, hf⟩⟩
exists_eq_graphOn_image_fst
end graphOn
/-! ### Surjectivity on a set -/
section surjOn
theorem SurjOn.subset_range (h : SurjOn f s t) : t ⊆ range f :=
Subset.trans h <| image_subset_range f s
theorem surjOn_iff_exists_map_subtype :
SurjOn f s t ↔ ∃ (t' : Set β) (g : s → t'), t ⊆ t' ∧ Surjective g ∧ ∀ x : s, f x = g x :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨_, (mapsTo_image f s).restrict f s _, h, surjective_mapsTo_image_restrict _ _, fun _ => rfl⟩,
fun ⟨t', g, htt', hg, hfg⟩ y hy =>
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hg ⟨y, htt' hy⟩
⟨x, x.2, by rw [hfg, hx, Subtype.coe_mk]⟩⟩
theorem surjOn_empty (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : SurjOn f s ∅ :=
empty_subset _
@[simp] theorem surjOn_empty_iff : SurjOn f ∅ t ↔ t = ∅ := by
simp [SurjOn, subset_empty_iff]
@[simp] lemma surjOn_singleton : SurjOn f s {b} ↔ b ∈ f '' s := singleton_subset_iff
theorem surjOn_image (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : SurjOn f s (f '' s) :=
Subset.rfl
theorem SurjOn.comap_nonempty (h : SurjOn f s t) (ht : t.Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
(ht.mono h).of_image
theorem SurjOn.congr (h : SurjOn f₁ s t) (H : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : SurjOn f₂ s t := by
rwa [SurjOn, ← H.image_eq]
theorem EqOn.surjOn_iff (h : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : SurjOn f₁ s t ↔ SurjOn f₂ s t :=
⟨fun H => H.congr h, fun H => H.congr h.symm⟩
theorem SurjOn.mono (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) (hf : SurjOn f s₁ t₂) : SurjOn f s₂ t₁ :=
Subset.trans ht <| Subset.trans hf <| image_subset _ hs
theorem SurjOn.union (h₁ : SurjOn f s t₁) (h₂ : SurjOn f s t₂) : SurjOn f s (t₁ ∪ t₂) := fun _ hx =>
hx.elim (fun hx => h₁ hx) fun hx => h₂ hx
theorem SurjOn.union_union (h₁ : SurjOn f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : SurjOn f s₂ t₂) :
SurjOn f (s₁ ∪ s₂) (t₁ ∪ t₂) :=
(h₁.mono subset_union_left (Subset.refl _)).union
(h₂.mono subset_union_right (Subset.refl _))
theorem SurjOn.inter_inter (h₁ : SurjOn f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : SurjOn f s₂ t₂) (h : InjOn f (s₁ ∪ s₂)) :
SurjOn f (s₁ ∩ s₂) (t₁ ∩ t₂) := by
intro y hy
rcases h₁ hy.1 with ⟨x₁, hx₁, rfl⟩
rcases h₂ hy.2 with ⟨x₂, hx₂, heq⟩
obtain rfl : x₁ = x₂ := h (Or.inl hx₁) (Or.inr hx₂) heq.symm
exact mem_image_of_mem f ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
theorem SurjOn.inter (h₁ : SurjOn f s₁ t) (h₂ : SurjOn f s₂ t) (h : InjOn f (s₁ ∪ s₂)) :
SurjOn f (s₁ ∩ s₂) t :=
inter_self t ▸ h₁.inter_inter h₂ h
lemma surjOn_id (s : Set α) : SurjOn id s s := by simp [SurjOn]
theorem SurjOn.comp (hg : SurjOn g t p) (hf : SurjOn f s t) : SurjOn (g ∘ f) s p :=
Subset.trans hg <| Subset.trans (image_subset g hf) <| image_comp g f s ▸ Subset.refl _
lemma SurjOn.of_comp (h : SurjOn (g ∘ f) s p) (hr : MapsTo f s t) : SurjOn g t p := by
intro z hz
obtain ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ := h hz
exact ⟨f x, hr hx, rfl⟩
lemma surjOn_comp_iff : SurjOn (g ∘ f) s p ↔ SurjOn g (f '' s) p :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.of_comp <| mapsTo_image f s, fun h ↦ h.comp <| surjOn_image _ _⟩
lemma SurjOn.iterate {f : α → α} {s : Set α} (h : SurjOn f s s) : ∀ n, SurjOn f^[n] s s
| 0 => surjOn_id _
| (n + 1) => (h.iterate n).comp h
lemma SurjOn.comp_left (hf : SurjOn f s t) (g : β → γ) : SurjOn (g ∘ f) s (g '' t) := by
rw [SurjOn, image_comp g f]; exact image_subset _ hf
lemma SurjOn.comp_right {s : Set β} {t : Set γ} (hf : Surjective f) (hg : SurjOn g s t) :
SurjOn (g ∘ f) (f ⁻¹' s) t := by
rwa [SurjOn, image_comp g f, image_preimage_eq _ hf]
lemma surjOn_of_subsingleton' [Subsingleton β] (f : α → β) (h : t.Nonempty → s.Nonempty) :
SurjOn f s t :=
fun _ ha ↦ Subsingleton.mem_iff_nonempty.2 <| (h ⟨_, ha⟩).image _
lemma surjOn_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (f : α → α) (s : Set α) : SurjOn f s s :=
surjOn_of_subsingleton' _ id
theorem surjective_iff_surjOn_univ : Surjective f ↔ SurjOn f univ univ := by
simp [Surjective, SurjOn, subset_def]
theorem SurjOn.image_eq_of_mapsTo (h₁ : SurjOn f s t) (h₂ : MapsTo f s t) : f '' s = t :=
eq_of_subset_of_subset h₂.image_subset h₁
theorem image_eq_iff_surjOn_mapsTo : f '' s = t ↔ s.SurjOn f t ∧ s.MapsTo f t := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h => h.1.image_eq_of_mapsTo h.2⟩
rintro rfl
exact ⟨s.surjOn_image f, s.mapsTo_image f⟩
lemma SurjOn.image_preimage (h : Set.SurjOn f s t) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t) : f '' (f ⁻¹' t₁) = t₁ :=
image_preimage_eq_iff.2 fun _ hx ↦ mem_range_of_mem_image f s <| h <| ht hx
theorem SurjOn.mapsTo_compl (h : SurjOn f s t) (h' : Injective f) : MapsTo f sᶜ tᶜ :=
fun _ hs ht =>
let ⟨_, hx', HEq⟩ := h ht
hs <| h' HEq ▸ hx'
theorem MapsTo.surjOn_compl (h : MapsTo f s t) (h' : Surjective f) : SurjOn f sᶜ tᶜ :=
h'.forall.2 fun _ ht => (mem_image_of_mem _) fun hs => ht (h hs)
theorem EqOn.cancel_right (hf : s.EqOn (g₁ ∘ f) (g₂ ∘ f)) (hf' : s.SurjOn f t) : t.EqOn g₁ g₂ := by
intro b hb
obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := hf' hb
exact hf ha
theorem SurjOn.cancel_right (hf : s.SurjOn f t) (hf' : s.MapsTo f t) :
s.EqOn (g₁ ∘ f) (g₂ ∘ f) ↔ t.EqOn g₁ g₂ :=
⟨fun h => h.cancel_right hf, fun h => h.comp_right hf'⟩
theorem eqOn_comp_right_iff : s.EqOn (g₁ ∘ f) (g₂ ∘ f) ↔ (f '' s).EqOn g₁ g₂ :=
(s.surjOn_image f).cancel_right <| s.mapsTo_image f
theorem SurjOn.forall {p : β → Prop} (hf : s.SurjOn f t) (hf' : s.MapsTo f t) :
(∀ y ∈ t, p y) ↔ (∀ x ∈ s, p (f x)) :=
⟨fun H x hx ↦ H (f x) (hf' hx), fun H _y hy ↦ let ⟨x, hx, hxy⟩ := hf hy; hxy ▸ H x hx⟩
end surjOn
/-! ### Bijectivity -/
section bijOn
theorem BijOn.mapsTo (h : BijOn f s t) : MapsTo f s t :=
h.left
theorem BijOn.injOn (h : BijOn f s t) : InjOn f s :=
h.right.left
theorem BijOn.surjOn (h : BijOn f s t) : SurjOn f s t :=
h.right.right
theorem BijOn.mk (h₁ : MapsTo f s t) (h₂ : InjOn f s) (h₃ : SurjOn f s t) : BijOn f s t :=
⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩
theorem bijOn_empty (f : α → β) : BijOn f ∅ ∅ :=
⟨mapsTo_empty f ∅, injOn_empty f, surjOn_empty f ∅⟩
@[simp] theorem bijOn_empty_iff_left : BijOn f s ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using h.mapsTo, by rintro rfl; exact bijOn_empty f⟩
@[simp] theorem bijOn_empty_iff_right : BijOn f ∅ t ↔ t = ∅ :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using h.surjOn, by rintro rfl; exact bijOn_empty f⟩
@[simp] lemma bijOn_singleton : BijOn f {a} {b} ↔ f a = b := by simp [BijOn, eq_comm]
theorem BijOn.inter_mapsTo (h₁ : BijOn f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : MapsTo f s₂ t₂) (h₃ : s₁ ∩ f ⁻¹' t₂ ⊆ s₂) :
BijOn f (s₁ ∩ s₂) (t₁ ∩ t₂) :=
⟨h₁.mapsTo.inter_inter h₂, h₁.injOn.mono inter_subset_left, fun _ hy =>
let ⟨x, hx, hxy⟩ := h₁.surjOn hy.1
⟨x, ⟨hx, h₃ ⟨hx, hxy.symm.subst hy.2⟩⟩, hxy⟩⟩
theorem MapsTo.inter_bijOn (h₁ : MapsTo f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : BijOn f s₂ t₂) (h₃ : s₂ ∩ f ⁻¹' t₁ ⊆ s₁) :
BijOn f (s₁ ∩ s₂) (t₁ ∩ t₂) :=
inter_comm s₂ s₁ ▸ inter_comm t₂ t₁ ▸ h₂.inter_mapsTo h₁ h₃
theorem BijOn.inter (h₁ : BijOn f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : BijOn f s₂ t₂) (h : InjOn f (s₁ ∪ s₂)) :
BijOn f (s₁ ∩ s₂) (t₁ ∩ t₂) :=
⟨h₁.mapsTo.inter_inter h₂.mapsTo, h₁.injOn.mono inter_subset_left,
h₁.surjOn.inter_inter h₂.surjOn h⟩
theorem BijOn.union (h₁ : BijOn f s₁ t₁) (h₂ : BijOn f s₂ t₂) (h : InjOn f (s₁ ∪ s₂)) :
BijOn f (s₁ ∪ s₂) (t₁ ∪ t₂) :=
⟨h₁.mapsTo.union_union h₂.mapsTo, h, h₁.surjOn.union_union h₂.surjOn⟩
theorem BijOn.subset_range (h : BijOn f s t) : t ⊆ range f :=
h.surjOn.subset_range
theorem InjOn.bijOn_image (h : InjOn f s) : BijOn f s (f '' s) :=
BijOn.mk (mapsTo_image f s) h (Subset.refl _)
theorem BijOn.congr (h₁ : BijOn f₁ s t) (h : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : BijOn f₂ s t :=
BijOn.mk (h₁.mapsTo.congr h) (h₁.injOn.congr h) (h₁.surjOn.congr h)
theorem EqOn.bijOn_iff (H : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : BijOn f₁ s t ↔ BijOn f₂ s t :=
⟨fun h => h.congr H, fun h => h.congr H.symm⟩
theorem BijOn.image_eq (h : BijOn f s t) : f '' s = t :=
h.surjOn.image_eq_of_mapsTo h.mapsTo
lemma BijOn.forall {p : β → Prop} (hf : BijOn f s t) : (∀ b ∈ t, p b) ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, p (f a) where
mp h _ ha := h _ <| hf.mapsTo ha
mpr h b hb := by obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := hf.surjOn hb; exact h _ ha
lemma BijOn.exists {p : β → Prop} (hf : BijOn f s t) : (∃ b ∈ t, p b) ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, p (f a) where
mp := by rintro ⟨b, hb, h⟩; obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := hf.surjOn hb; exact ⟨a, ha, h⟩
mpr := by rintro ⟨a, ha, h⟩; exact ⟨f a, hf.mapsTo ha, h⟩
lemma _root_.Equiv.image_eq_iff_bijOn (e : α ≃ β) : e '' s = t ↔ BijOn e s t :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨(mapsTo_image e s).mono_right h.subset, e.injective.injOn, h ▸ surjOn_image e s⟩,
BijOn.image_eq⟩
lemma bijOn_id (s : Set α) : BijOn id s s := ⟨s.mapsTo_id, s.injOn_id, s.surjOn_id⟩
theorem BijOn.comp (hg : BijOn g t p) (hf : BijOn f s t) : BijOn (g ∘ f) s p :=
BijOn.mk (hg.mapsTo.comp hf.mapsTo) (hg.injOn.comp hf.injOn hf.mapsTo) (hg.surjOn.comp hf.surjOn)
/-- If `f : α → β` and `g : β → γ` and if `f` is injective on `s`, then `f ∘ g` is a bijection
on `s` iff `g` is a bijection on `f '' s`. -/
theorem bijOn_comp_iff (hf : InjOn f s) : BijOn (g ∘ f) s p ↔ BijOn g (f '' s) p := by
simp only [BijOn, InjOn.comp_iff, surjOn_comp_iff, mapsTo_image_iff, hf]
/--
If we have a commutative square
```
α --f--> β
| |
p₁ p₂
| |
\/ \/
γ --g--> δ
```
and `f` induces a bijection from `s : Set α` to `t : Set β`, then `g`
induces a bijection from the image of `s` to the image of `t`, as long as `g` is
is injective on the image of `s`.
-/
theorem bijOn_image_image {p₁ : α → γ} {p₂ : β → δ} {g : γ → δ} (comm : ∀ a, p₂ (f a) = g (p₁ a))
(hbij : BijOn f s t) (hinj: InjOn g (p₁ '' s)) : BijOn g (p₁ '' s) (p₂ '' t) := by
obtain ⟨h1, h2, h3⟩ := hbij
refine ⟨?_, hinj, ?_⟩
· rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact ⟨f a, h1 ha, by rw [comm a]⟩
· rintro _ ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := h3 hb
rw [← image_comp, comm]
exact ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
lemma BijOn.iterate {f : α → α} {s : Set α} (h : BijOn f s s) : ∀ n, BijOn f^[n] s s
| 0 => s.bijOn_id
| (n + 1) => (h.iterate n).comp h
lemma bijOn_of_subsingleton' [Subsingleton α] [Subsingleton β] (f : α → β)
(h : s.Nonempty ↔ t.Nonempty) : BijOn f s t :=
⟨mapsTo_of_subsingleton' _ h.1, injOn_of_subsingleton _ _, surjOn_of_subsingleton' _ h.2⟩
lemma bijOn_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (f : α → α) (s : Set α) : BijOn f s s :=
bijOn_of_subsingleton' _ Iff.rfl
theorem BijOn.bijective (h : BijOn f s t) : Bijective (h.mapsTo.restrict f s t) :=
⟨fun x y h' => Subtype.ext <| h.injOn x.2 y.2 <| Subtype.ext_iff.1 h', fun ⟨_, hy⟩ =>
let ⟨x, hx, hxy⟩ := h.surjOn hy
⟨⟨x, hx⟩, Subtype.eq hxy⟩⟩
theorem bijective_iff_bijOn_univ : Bijective f ↔ BijOn f univ univ :=
Iff.intro
(fun h =>
let ⟨inj, surj⟩ := h
⟨mapsTo_univ f _, inj.injOn, Iff.mp surjective_iff_surjOn_univ surj⟩)
fun h =>
let ⟨_map, inj, surj⟩ := h
⟨Iff.mpr injective_iff_injOn_univ inj, Iff.mpr surjective_iff_surjOn_univ surj⟩
alias ⟨_root_.Function.Bijective.bijOn_univ, _⟩ := bijective_iff_bijOn_univ
theorem BijOn.compl (hst : BijOn f s t) (hf : Bijective f) : BijOn f sᶜ tᶜ :=
⟨hst.surjOn.mapsTo_compl hf.1, hf.1.injOn, hst.mapsTo.surjOn_compl hf.2⟩
theorem BijOn.subset_right {r : Set β} (hf : BijOn f s t) (hrt : r ⊆ t) :
BijOn f (s ∩ f ⁻¹' r) r := by
refine ⟨inter_subset_right, hf.injOn.mono inter_subset_left, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ := hf.surjOn (hrt hx)
exact ⟨y, ⟨hy, hx⟩, rfl⟩
theorem BijOn.subset_left {r : Set α} (hf : BijOn f s t) (hrs : r ⊆ s) :
BijOn f r (f '' r) :=
(hf.injOn.mono hrs).bijOn_image
theorem BijOn.insert_iff (ha : a ∉ s) (hfa : f a ∉ t) :
BijOn f (insert a s) (insert (f a) t) ↔ BijOn f s t where
mp h := by
have := congrArg (· \ {f a}) (image_insert_eq ▸ h.image_eq)
simp only [mem_singleton_iff, insert_diff_of_mem] at this
rw [diff_singleton_eq_self hfa, diff_singleton_eq_self] at this
· exact ⟨by simp [← this, mapsTo'], h.injOn.mono (subset_insert ..),
by simp [← this, surjOn_image]⟩
simp only [mem_image, not_exists, not_and]
intro x hx
rw [h.injOn.eq_iff (by simp [hx]) (by simp)]
exact ha ∘ (· ▸ hx)
mpr h := by
repeat rw [insert_eq]
refine (bijOn_singleton.mpr rfl).union h ?_
simp only [singleton_union, injOn_insert fun x ↦ (hfa (h.mapsTo x)), h.injOn, mem_image,
not_exists, not_and, true_and]
exact fun _ hx h₂ ↦ hfa (h₂ ▸ h.mapsTo hx)
theorem BijOn.insert (h₁ : BijOn f s t) (h₂ : f a ∉ t) :
BijOn f (insert a s) (insert (f a) t) :=
(insert_iff (h₂ <| h₁.mapsTo ·) h₂).mpr h₁
theorem BijOn.sdiff_singleton (h₁ : BijOn f s t) (h₂ : a ∈ s) :
BijOn f (s \ {a}) (t \ {f a}) := by
convert h₁.subset_left diff_subset
simp [h₁.injOn.image_diff, h₁.image_eq, h₂, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right]
end bijOn
/-! ### left inverse -/
namespace LeftInvOn
theorem eqOn (h : LeftInvOn f' f s) : EqOn (f' ∘ f) id s :=
h
theorem eq (h : LeftInvOn f' f s) {x} (hx : x ∈ s) : f' (f x) = x :=
h hx
theorem congr_left (h₁ : LeftInvOn f₁' f s) {t : Set β} (h₁' : MapsTo f s t)
(heq : EqOn f₁' f₂' t) : LeftInvOn f₂' f s := fun _ hx => heq (h₁' hx) ▸ h₁ hx
theorem congr_right (h₁ : LeftInvOn f₁' f₁ s) (heq : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) : LeftInvOn f₁' f₂ s :=
fun _ hx => heq hx ▸ h₁ hx
theorem injOn (h : LeftInvOn f₁' f s) : InjOn f s := fun x₁ h₁ x₂ h₂ heq =>
calc
x₁ = f₁' (f x₁) := Eq.symm <| h h₁
_ = f₁' (f x₂) := congr_arg f₁' heq
_ = x₂ := h h₂
theorem surjOn (h : LeftInvOn f' f s) (hf : MapsTo f s t) : SurjOn f' t s := fun x hx =>
⟨f x, hf hx, h hx⟩
theorem mapsTo (h : LeftInvOn f' f s) (hf : SurjOn f s t) :
MapsTo f' t s := fun y hy => by
let ⟨x, hs, hx⟩ := hf hy
rwa [← hx, h hs]
lemma _root_.Set.leftInvOn_id (s : Set α) : LeftInvOn id id s := fun _ _ ↦ rfl
theorem comp (hf' : LeftInvOn f' f s) (hg' : LeftInvOn g' g t) (hf : MapsTo f s t) :
LeftInvOn (f' ∘ g') (g ∘ f) s := fun x h =>
calc
(f' ∘ g') ((g ∘ f) x) = f' (f x) := congr_arg f' (hg' (hf h))
_ = x := hf' h
theorem mono (hf : LeftInvOn f' f s) (ht : s₁ ⊆ s) : LeftInvOn f' f s₁ := fun _ hx =>
hf (ht hx)
theorem image_inter' (hf : LeftInvOn f' f s) : f '' (s₁ ∩ s) = f' ⁻¹' s₁ ∩ f '' s := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· rintro _ ⟨x, ⟨h₁, h⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨by rwa [mem_preimage, hf h], mem_image_of_mem _ h⟩
· rintro _ ⟨h₁, ⟨x, h, rfl⟩⟩
exact mem_image_of_mem _ ⟨by rwa [← hf h], h⟩
theorem image_inter (hf : LeftInvOn f' f s) :
f '' (s₁ ∩ s) = f' ⁻¹' (s₁ ∩ s) ∩ f '' s := by
rw [hf.image_inter']
refine Subset.antisymm ?_ (inter_subset_inter_left _ (preimage_mono inter_subset_left))
rintro _ ⟨h₁, x, hx, rfl⟩; exact ⟨⟨h₁, by rwa [hf hx]⟩, mem_image_of_mem _ hx⟩
theorem image_image (hf : LeftInvOn f' f s) : f' '' (f '' s) = s := by
rw [Set.image_image, image_congr hf, image_id']
theorem image_image' (hf : LeftInvOn f' f s) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s) : f' '' (f '' s₁) = s₁ :=
(hf.mono hs).image_image
end LeftInvOn
/-! ### Right inverse -/
section RightInvOn
namespace RightInvOn
theorem eqOn (h : RightInvOn f' f t) : EqOn (f ∘ f') id t :=
h
theorem eq (h : RightInvOn f' f t) {y} (hy : y ∈ t) : f (f' y) = y :=
h hy
theorem _root_.Set.LeftInvOn.rightInvOn_image (h : LeftInvOn f' f s) : RightInvOn f' f (f '' s) :=
fun _y ⟨_x, hx, heq⟩ => heq ▸ (congr_arg f <| h.eq hx)
theorem congr_left (h₁ : RightInvOn f₁' f t) (heq : EqOn f₁' f₂' t) :
RightInvOn f₂' f t :=
h₁.congr_right heq
theorem congr_right (h₁ : RightInvOn f' f₁ t) (hg : MapsTo f' t s) (heq : EqOn f₁ f₂ s) :
RightInvOn f' f₂ t :=
LeftInvOn.congr_left h₁ hg heq
theorem surjOn (hf : RightInvOn f' f t) (hf' : MapsTo f' t s) : SurjOn f s t :=
LeftInvOn.surjOn hf hf'
theorem mapsTo (h : RightInvOn f' f t) (hf : SurjOn f' t s) : MapsTo f s t :=
LeftInvOn.mapsTo h hf
lemma _root_.Set.rightInvOn_id (s : Set α) : RightInvOn id id s := fun _ _ ↦ rfl
theorem comp (hf : RightInvOn f' f t) (hg : RightInvOn g' g p) (g'pt : MapsTo g' p t) :
RightInvOn (f' ∘ g') (g ∘ f) p :=
LeftInvOn.comp hg hf g'pt
theorem mono (hf : RightInvOn f' f t) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t) : RightInvOn f' f t₁ :=
LeftInvOn.mono hf ht
end RightInvOn
theorem InjOn.rightInvOn_of_leftInvOn (hf : InjOn f s) (hf' : LeftInvOn f f' t)
(h₁ : MapsTo f s t) (h₂ : MapsTo f' t s) : RightInvOn f f' s := fun _ h =>
hf (h₂ <| h₁ h) h (hf' (h₁ h))
theorem eqOn_of_leftInvOn_of_rightInvOn (h₁ : LeftInvOn f₁' f s) (h₂ : RightInvOn f₂' f t)
(h : MapsTo f₂' t s) : EqOn f₁' f₂' t := fun y hy =>
calc
f₁' y = (f₁' ∘ f ∘ f₂') y := congr_arg f₁' (h₂ hy).symm
_ = f₂' y := h₁ (h hy)
theorem SurjOn.leftInvOn_of_rightInvOn (hf : SurjOn f s t) (hf' : RightInvOn f f' s) :
LeftInvOn f f' t := fun y hy => by
let ⟨x, hx, heq⟩ := hf hy
rw [← heq, hf' hx]
end RightInvOn
/-! ### Two-side inverses -/
namespace InvOn
lemma _root_.Set.invOn_id (s : Set α) : InvOn id id s s := ⟨s.leftInvOn_id, s.rightInvOn_id⟩
lemma comp (hf : InvOn f' f s t) (hg : InvOn g' g t p) (fst : MapsTo f s t)
(g'pt : MapsTo g' p t) :
InvOn (f' ∘ g') (g ∘ f) s p :=
⟨hf.1.comp hg.1 fst, hf.2.comp hg.2 g'pt⟩
@[symm]
theorem symm (h : InvOn f' f s t) : InvOn f f' t s :=
⟨h.right, h.left⟩
theorem mono (h : InvOn f' f s t) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t) : InvOn f' f s₁ t₁ :=
⟨h.1.mono hs, h.2.mono ht⟩
/-- If functions `f'` and `f` are inverse on `s` and `t`, `f` maps `s` into `t`, and `f'` maps `t`
into `s`, then `f` is a bijection between `s` and `t`. The `mapsTo` arguments can be deduced from
`surjOn` statements using `LeftInvOn.mapsTo` and `RightInvOn.mapsTo`. -/
theorem bijOn (h : InvOn f' f s t) (hf : MapsTo f s t) (hf' : MapsTo f' t s) : BijOn f s t :=
⟨hf, h.left.injOn, h.right.surjOn hf'⟩
end InvOn
end Set
/-! ### `invFunOn` is a left/right inverse -/
namespace Function
variable {s : Set α} {f : α → β} {a : α} {b : β}
/-- Construct the inverse for a function `f` on domain `s`. This function is a right inverse of `f`
on `f '' s`. For a computable version, see `Function.Embedding.invOfMemRange`. -/
noncomputable def invFunOn [Nonempty α] (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (b : β) : α :=
open scoped Classical in
if h : ∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = b then Classical.choose h else Classical.choice ‹Nonempty α›
variable [Nonempty α]
theorem invFunOn_pos (h : ∃ a ∈ s, f a = b) : invFunOn f s b ∈ s ∧ f (invFunOn f s b) = b := by
rw [invFunOn, dif_pos h]
exact Classical.choose_spec h
theorem invFunOn_mem (h : ∃ a ∈ s, f a = b) : invFunOn f s b ∈ s :=
(invFunOn_pos h).left
theorem invFunOn_eq (h : ∃ a ∈ s, f a = b) : f (invFunOn f s b) = b :=
(invFunOn_pos h).right
theorem invFunOn_neg (h : ¬∃ a ∈ s, f a = b) : invFunOn f s b = Classical.choice ‹Nonempty α› := by
rw [invFunOn, dif_neg h]
@[simp]
theorem invFunOn_apply_mem (h : a ∈ s) : invFunOn f s (f a) ∈ s :=
invFunOn_mem ⟨a, h, rfl⟩
theorem invFunOn_apply_eq (h : a ∈ s) : f (invFunOn f s (f a)) = f a :=
invFunOn_eq ⟨a, h, rfl⟩
end Function
open Function
namespace Set
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β}
theorem InjOn.leftInvOn_invFunOn [Nonempty α] (h : InjOn f s) : LeftInvOn (invFunOn f s) f s :=
fun _a ha => h (invFunOn_apply_mem ha) ha (invFunOn_apply_eq ha)
theorem InjOn.invFunOn_image [Nonempty α] (h : InjOn f s₂) (ht : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
invFunOn f s₂ '' (f '' s₁) = s₁ :=
h.leftInvOn_invFunOn.image_image' ht
theorem _root_.Function.leftInvOn_invFunOn_of_subset_image_image [Nonempty α]
(h : s ⊆ (invFunOn f s) '' (f '' s)) : LeftInvOn (invFunOn f s) f s :=
fun x hx ↦ by
obtain ⟨-, ⟨x, hx', rfl⟩, rfl⟩ := h hx
rw [invFunOn_apply_eq (f := f) hx']
theorem injOn_iff_invFunOn_image_image_eq_self [Nonempty α] :
InjOn f s ↔ (invFunOn f s) '' (f '' s) = s :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.invFunOn_image Subset.rfl, fun h ↦
(Function.leftInvOn_invFunOn_of_subset_image_image h.symm.subset).injOn⟩
theorem _root_.Function.invFunOn_injOn_image [Nonempty α] (f : α → β) (s : Set α) :
Set.InjOn (invFunOn f s) (f '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ _ ⟨x', hx', rfl⟩ he
rw [← invFunOn_apply_eq (f := f) hx, he, invFunOn_apply_eq (f := f) hx']
theorem _root_.Function.invFunOn_image_image_subset [Nonempty α] (f : α → β) (s : Set α) :
(invFunOn f s) '' (f '' s) ⊆ s := by
rintro _ ⟨_, ⟨x,hx,rfl⟩, rfl⟩; exact invFunOn_apply_mem hx
theorem SurjOn.rightInvOn_invFunOn [Nonempty α] (h : SurjOn f s t) :
RightInvOn (invFunOn f s) f t := fun _y hy => invFunOn_eq <| h hy
theorem BijOn.invOn_invFunOn [Nonempty α] (h : BijOn f s t) : InvOn (invFunOn f s) f s t :=
⟨h.injOn.leftInvOn_invFunOn, h.surjOn.rightInvOn_invFunOn⟩
theorem SurjOn.invOn_invFunOn [Nonempty α] (h : SurjOn f s t) :
InvOn (invFunOn f s) f (invFunOn f s '' t) t := by
refine ⟨?_, h.rightInvOn_invFunOn⟩
rintro _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
rw [h.rightInvOn_invFunOn hy]
theorem SurjOn.mapsTo_invFunOn [Nonempty α] (h : SurjOn f s t) : MapsTo (invFunOn f s) t s :=
fun _y hy => mem_preimage.2 <| invFunOn_mem <| h hy
/-- This lemma is a special case of `rightInvOn_invFunOn.image_image'`; it may make more sense
to use the other lemma directly in an application. -/
theorem SurjOn.image_invFunOn_image_of_subset [Nonempty α] {r : Set β} (hf : SurjOn f s t)
(hrt : r ⊆ t) : f '' (f.invFunOn s '' r) = r :=
hf.rightInvOn_invFunOn.image_image' hrt
/-- This lemma is a special case of `rightInvOn_invFunOn.image_image`; it may make more sense
to use the other lemma directly in an application. -/
theorem SurjOn.image_invFunOn_image [Nonempty α] (hf : SurjOn f s t) :
f '' (f.invFunOn s '' t) = t :=
hf.rightInvOn_invFunOn.image_image
theorem SurjOn.bijOn_subset [Nonempty α] (h : SurjOn f s t) : BijOn f (invFunOn f s '' t) t := by
refine h.invOn_invFunOn.bijOn ?_ (mapsTo_image _ _)
rintro _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
rwa [h.rightInvOn_invFunOn hy]
theorem surjOn_iff_exists_bijOn_subset : SurjOn f s t ↔ ∃ s' ⊆ s, BijOn f s' t := by
constructor
· rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty t with (rfl | ht)
· exact fun _ => ⟨∅, empty_subset _, bijOn_empty f⟩
· intro h
haveI : Nonempty α := ⟨Classical.choose (h.comap_nonempty ht)⟩
exact ⟨_, h.mapsTo_invFunOn.image_subset, h.bijOn_subset⟩
· rintro ⟨s', hs', hfs'⟩
exact hfs'.surjOn.mono hs' (Subset.refl _)
alias ⟨SurjOn.exists_bijOn_subset, _⟩ := Set.surjOn_iff_exists_bijOn_subset
variable (f s)
lemma exists_subset_bijOn : ∃ s' ⊆ s, BijOn f s' (f '' s) :=
surjOn_iff_exists_bijOn_subset.mp (surjOn_image f s)
lemma exists_image_eq_and_injOn : ∃ u, f '' u = f '' s ∧ InjOn f u :=
let ⟨u, _, hfu⟩ := exists_subset_bijOn s f
⟨u, hfu.image_eq, hfu.injOn⟩
variable {f s}
lemma exists_image_eq_injOn_of_subset_range (ht : t ⊆ range f) :
∃ s, f '' s = t ∧ InjOn f s :=
image_preimage_eq_of_subset ht ▸ exists_image_eq_and_injOn _ _
/-- If `f` maps `s` bijectively to `t` and a set `t'` is contained in the image of some `s₁ ⊇ s`,
then `s₁` has a subset containing `s` that `f` maps bijectively to `t'`. -/
theorem BijOn.exists_extend_of_subset {t' : Set β} (h : BijOn f s t) (hss₁ : s ⊆ s₁) (htt' : t ⊆ t')
(ht' : SurjOn f s₁ t') : ∃ s', s ⊆ s' ∧ s' ⊆ s₁ ∧ Set.BijOn f s' t' := by
obtain ⟨r, hrss, hbij⟩ := exists_subset_bijOn ((s₁ ∩ f ⁻¹' t') \ f ⁻¹' t) f
rw [image_diff_preimage, image_inter_preimage] at hbij
refine ⟨s ∪ r, subset_union_left, ?_, ?_, ?_, fun y hyt' ↦ ?_⟩
· exact union_subset hss₁ <| hrss.trans <| diff_subset.trans inter_subset_left
· rw [mapsTo', image_union, hbij.image_eq, h.image_eq, union_subset_iff]
exact ⟨htt', diff_subset.trans inter_subset_right⟩
· rw [injOn_union, and_iff_right h.injOn, and_iff_right hbij.injOn]
· refine fun x hxs y hyr hxy ↦ (hrss hyr).2 ?_
rw [← h.image_eq]
exact ⟨x, hxs, hxy⟩
exact (subset_diff.1 hrss).2.symm.mono_left h.mapsTo
rw [image_union, h.image_eq, hbij.image_eq, union_diff_self]
exact .inr ⟨ht' hyt', hyt'⟩
/-- If `f` maps `s` bijectively to `t`, and `t'` is a superset of `t` contained in the range of `f`,
then `f` maps some superset of `s` bijectively to `t'`. -/
theorem BijOn.exists_extend {t' : Set β} (h : BijOn f s t) (htt' : t ⊆ t') (ht' : t' ⊆ range f) :
∃ s', s ⊆ s' ∧ BijOn f s' t' := by
simpa using h.exists_extend_of_subset (subset_univ s) htt' (by simpa [SurjOn])
theorem InjOn.exists_subset_injOn_subset_range_eq {r : Set α} (hinj : InjOn f r) (hrs : r ⊆ s) :
∃ u : Set α, r ⊆ u ∧ u ⊆ s ∧ f '' u = f '' s ∧ InjOn f u := by
obtain ⟨u, hru, hus, h⟩ := hinj.bijOn_image.exists_extend_of_subset hrs
(image_subset f hrs) Subset.rfl
exact ⟨u, hru, hus, h.image_eq, h.injOn⟩
theorem preimage_invFun_of_mem [n : Nonempty α] {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) {s : Set α}
(h : Classical.choice n ∈ s) : invFun f ⁻¹' s = f '' s ∪ (range f)ᶜ := by
ext x
rcases em (x ∈ range f) with (⟨a, rfl⟩ | hx)
· simp only [mem_preimage, mem_union, mem_compl_iff, mem_range_self, not_true, or_false,
leftInverse_invFun hf _, hf.mem_set_image]
· simp only [mem_preimage, invFun_neg hx, h, hx, mem_union, mem_compl_iff, not_false_iff, or_true]
theorem preimage_invFun_of_not_mem [n : Nonempty α] {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) {s : Set α}
(h : Classical.choice n ∉ s) : invFun f ⁻¹' s = f '' s := by
ext x
rcases em (x ∈ range f) with (⟨a, rfl⟩ | hx)
· rw [mem_preimage, leftInverse_invFun hf, hf.mem_set_image]
· have : x ∉ f '' s := fun h' => hx (image_subset_range _ _ h')
simp only [mem_preimage, invFun_neg hx, h, this]
lemma BijOn.symm {g : β → α} (h : InvOn f g t s) (hf : BijOn f s t) : BijOn g t s :=
⟨h.2.mapsTo hf.surjOn, h.1.injOn, h.2.surjOn hf.mapsTo⟩
lemma bijOn_comm {g : β → α} (h : InvOn f g t s) : BijOn f s t ↔ BijOn g t s :=
⟨BijOn.symm h, BijOn.symm h.symm⟩
end Set
namespace Function
open Set
variable {fa : α → α} {fb : β → β} {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} {s t : Set α}
theorem Injective.comp_injOn (hg : Injective g) (hf : s.InjOn f) : s.InjOn (g ∘ f) :=
hg.injOn.comp hf (mapsTo_univ _ _)
theorem Surjective.surjOn (hf : Surjective f) (s : Set β) : SurjOn f univ s :=
(surjective_iff_surjOn_univ.1 hf).mono (Subset.refl _) (subset_univ _)
theorem LeftInverse.leftInvOn {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse f g) (s : Set β) : LeftInvOn f g s :=
fun x _ => h x
theorem RightInverse.rightInvOn {g : β → α} (h : RightInverse f g) (s : Set α) :
RightInvOn f g s := fun x _ => h x
theorem LeftInverse.rightInvOn_range {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse f g) :
RightInvOn f g (range g) :=
forall_mem_range.2 fun i => congr_arg g (h i)
namespace Semiconj
theorem mapsTo_image (h : Semiconj f fa fb) (ha : MapsTo fa s t) : MapsTo fb (f '' s) (f '' t) :=
fun _y ⟨x, hx, hy⟩ => hy ▸ ⟨fa x, ha hx, h x⟩
theorem mapsTo_image_right {t : Set β} (h : Semiconj f fa fb) (hst : MapsTo f s t) :
MapsTo f (fa '' s) (fb '' t) :=
mapsTo_image_iff.2 fun x hx ↦ ⟨f x, hst hx, (h x).symm⟩
theorem mapsTo_range (h : Semiconj f fa fb) : MapsTo fb (range f) (range f) := fun _y ⟨x, hy⟩ =>
hy ▸ ⟨fa x, h x⟩
theorem surjOn_image (h : Semiconj f fa fb) (ha : SurjOn fa s t) : SurjOn fb (f '' s) (f '' t) := by
rintro y ⟨x, hxt, rfl⟩
rcases ha hxt with ⟨x, hxs, rfl⟩
rw [h x]
exact mem_image_of_mem _ (mem_image_of_mem _ hxs)
theorem surjOn_range (h : Semiconj f fa fb) (ha : Surjective fa) :
SurjOn fb (range f) (range f) := by
rw [← image_univ]
exact h.surjOn_image (ha.surjOn univ)
theorem injOn_image (h : Semiconj f fa fb) (ha : InjOn fa s) (hf : InjOn f (fa '' s)) :
InjOn fb (f '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ H
simp only [← h.eq] at H
exact congr_arg f (ha hx hy <| hf (mem_image_of_mem fa hx) (mem_image_of_mem fa hy) H)
theorem injOn_range (h : Semiconj f fa fb) (ha : Injective fa) (hf : InjOn f (range fa)) :
InjOn fb (range f) := by
rw [← image_univ] at *
exact h.injOn_image ha.injOn hf
theorem bijOn_image (h : Semiconj f fa fb) (ha : BijOn fa s t) (hf : InjOn f t) :
BijOn fb (f '' s) (f '' t) :=
⟨h.mapsTo_image ha.mapsTo, h.injOn_image ha.injOn (ha.image_eq.symm ▸ hf),
h.surjOn_image ha.surjOn⟩
theorem bijOn_range (h : Semiconj f fa fb) (ha : Bijective fa) (hf : Injective f) :
BijOn fb (range f) (range f) := by
rw [← image_univ]
exact h.bijOn_image (bijective_iff_bijOn_univ.1 ha) hf.injOn
theorem mapsTo_preimage (h : Semiconj f fa fb) {s t : Set β} (hb : MapsTo fb s t) :
MapsTo fa (f ⁻¹' s) (f ⁻¹' t) := fun x hx => by simp only [mem_preimage, h x, hb hx]
theorem injOn_preimage (h : Semiconj f fa fb) {s : Set β} (hb : InjOn fb s)
(hf : InjOn f (f ⁻¹' s)) : InjOn fa (f ⁻¹' s) := by
intro x hx y hy H
have := congr_arg f H
rw [h.eq, h.eq] at this
exact hf hx hy (hb hx hy this)
end Semiconj
theorem update_comp_eq_of_not_mem_range' {α : Sort*} {β : Type*} {γ : β → Sort*} [DecidableEq β]
(g : ∀ b, γ b) {f : α → β} {i : β} (a : γ i) (h : i ∉ Set.range f) :
(fun j => update g i a (f j)) = fun j => g (f j) :=
(update_comp_eq_of_forall_ne' _ _) fun x hx => h ⟨x, hx⟩
/-- Non-dependent version of `Function.update_comp_eq_of_not_mem_range'` -/
theorem update_comp_eq_of_not_mem_range {α : Sort*} {β : Type*} {γ : Sort*} [DecidableEq β]
(g : β → γ) {f : α → β} {i : β} (a : γ) (h : i ∉ Set.range f) : update g i a ∘ f = g ∘ f :=
update_comp_eq_of_not_mem_range' g a h
theorem insert_injOn (s : Set α) : sᶜ.InjOn fun a => insert a s := fun _a ha _ _ =>
(insert_inj ha).1
lemma apply_eq_of_range_eq_singleton {f : α → β} {b : β} (h : range f = {b}) (a : α) :
f a = b := by
simpa only [h, mem_singleton_iff] using mem_range_self (f := f) a
end Function
/-! ### Equivalences, permutations -/
namespace Set
variable {p : β → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {f : α ≃ Subtype p} {g g₁ g₂ : Perm α} {s t : Set α}
protected lemma MapsTo.extendDomain (h : MapsTo g s t) :
MapsTo (g.extendDomain f) ((↑) ∘ f '' s) ((↑) ∘ f '' t) := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; exact ⟨_, h ha, by simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, extendDomain_apply_image]⟩
protected lemma SurjOn.extendDomain (h : SurjOn g s t) :
SurjOn (g.extendDomain f) ((↑) ∘ f '' s) ((↑) ∘ f '' t) := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩ := h ha
exact ⟨_, ⟨_, hb, rfl⟩, by simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, extendDomain_apply_image]⟩
protected lemma BijOn.extendDomain (h : BijOn g s t) :
BijOn (g.extendDomain f) ((↑) ∘ f '' s) ((↑) ∘ f '' t) :=
⟨h.mapsTo.extendDomain, (g.extendDomain f).injective.injOn, h.surjOn.extendDomain⟩
protected lemma LeftInvOn.extendDomain (h : LeftInvOn g₁ g₂ s) :
LeftInvOn (g₁.extendDomain f) (g₂.extendDomain f) ((↑) ∘ f '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, extendDomain_apply_image, h ha]
protected lemma RightInvOn.extendDomain (h : RightInvOn g₁ g₂ t) :
RightInvOn (g₁.extendDomain f) (g₂.extendDomain f) ((↑) ∘ f '' t) := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, extendDomain_apply_image, h ha]
protected lemma InvOn.extendDomain (h : InvOn g₁ g₂ s t) :
InvOn (g₁.extendDomain f) (g₂.extendDomain f) ((↑) ∘ f '' s) ((↑) ∘ f '' t) :=
⟨h.1.extendDomain, h.2.extendDomain⟩
end Set
namespace Set
variable {α₁ α₂ β₁ β₂ : Type*} {s₁ : Set α₁} {s₂ : Set α₂} {t₁ : Set β₁} {t₂ : Set β₂}
{f₁ : α₁ → β₁} {f₂ : α₂ → β₂} {g₁ : β₁ → α₁} {g₂ : β₂ → α₂}
lemma InjOn.prodMap (h₁ : s₁.InjOn f₁) (h₂ : s₂.InjOn f₂) :
(s₁ ×ˢ s₂).InjOn fun x ↦ (f₁ x.1, f₂ x.2) :=
fun x hx y hy ↦ by simp_rw [Prod.ext_iff]; exact And.imp (h₁ hx.1 hy.1) (h₂ hx.2 hy.2)
lemma SurjOn.prodMap (h₁ : SurjOn f₁ s₁ t₁) (h₂ : SurjOn f₂ s₂ t₂) :
SurjOn (fun x ↦ (f₁ x.1, f₂ x.2)) (s₁ ×ˢ s₂) (t₁ ×ˢ t₂) := by
rintro x hx
obtain ⟨a₁, ha₁, hx₁⟩ := h₁ hx.1
obtain ⟨a₂, ha₂, hx₂⟩ := h₂ hx.2
exact ⟨(a₁, a₂), ⟨ha₁, ha₂⟩, Prod.ext hx₁ hx₂⟩
lemma MapsTo.prodMap (h₁ : MapsTo f₁ s₁ t₁) (h₂ : MapsTo f₂ s₂ t₂) :
MapsTo (fun x ↦ (f₁ x.1, f₂ x.2)) (s₁ ×ˢ s₂) (t₁ ×ˢ t₂) :=
fun _x hx ↦ ⟨h₁ hx.1, h₂ hx.2⟩
lemma BijOn.prodMap (h₁ : BijOn f₁ s₁ t₁) (h₂ : BijOn f₂ s₂ t₂) :
BijOn (fun x ↦ (f₁ x.1, f₂ x.2)) (s₁ ×ˢ s₂) (t₁ ×ˢ t₂) :=
⟨h₁.mapsTo.prodMap h₂.mapsTo, h₁.injOn.prodMap h₂.injOn, h₁.surjOn.prodMap h₂.surjOn⟩
lemma LeftInvOn.prodMap (h₁ : LeftInvOn g₁ f₁ s₁) (h₂ : LeftInvOn g₂ f₂ s₂) :
LeftInvOn (fun x ↦ (g₁ x.1, g₂ x.2)) (fun x ↦ (f₁ x.1, f₂ x.2)) (s₁ ×ˢ s₂) :=
fun _x hx ↦ Prod.ext (h₁ hx.1) (h₂ hx.2)
lemma RightInvOn.prodMap (h₁ : RightInvOn g₁ f₁ t₁) (h₂ : RightInvOn g₂ f₂ t₂) :
RightInvOn (fun x ↦ (g₁ x.1, g₂ x.2)) (fun x ↦ (f₁ x.1, f₂ x.2)) (t₁ ×ˢ t₂) :=
fun _x hx ↦ Prod.ext (h₁ hx.1) (h₂ hx.2)
lemma InvOn.prodMap (h₁ : InvOn g₁ f₁ s₁ t₁) (h₂ : InvOn g₂ f₂ s₂ t₂) :
InvOn (fun x ↦ (g₁ x.1, g₂ x.2)) (fun x ↦ (f₁ x.1, f₂ x.2)) (s₁ ×ˢ s₂) (t₁ ×ˢ t₂) :=
⟨h₁.1.prodMap h₂.1, h₁.2.prodMap h₂.2⟩
end Set
namespace Equiv
open Set
variable (e : α ≃ β) {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
lemma bijOn' (h₁ : MapsTo e s t) (h₂ : MapsTo e.symm t s) : BijOn e s t :=
⟨h₁, e.injective.injOn, fun b hb ↦ ⟨e.symm b, h₂ hb, apply_symm_apply _ _⟩⟩
protected lemma bijOn (h : ∀ a, e a ∈ t ↔ a ∈ s) : BijOn e s t :=
e.bijOn' (fun _ ↦ (h _).2) fun b hb ↦ (h _).1 <| by rwa [apply_symm_apply]
lemma invOn : InvOn e e.symm t s :=
⟨e.rightInverse_symm.leftInvOn _, e.leftInverse_symm.leftInvOn _⟩
lemma bijOn_image : BijOn e s (e '' s) := e.injective.injOn.bijOn_image
lemma bijOn_symm_image : BijOn e.symm (e '' s) s := e.bijOn_image.symm e.invOn
variable {e}
@[simp] lemma bijOn_symm : BijOn e.symm t s ↔ BijOn e s t := bijOn_comm e.symm.invOn
alias ⟨_root_.Set.BijOn.of_equiv_symm, _root_.Set.BijOn.equiv_symm⟩ := bijOn_symm
variable [DecidableEq α] {a b : α}
lemma bijOn_swap (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : BijOn (swap a b) s s :=
(swap a b).bijOn fun x ↦ by
obtain rfl | hxa := eq_or_ne x a <;>
obtain rfl | hxb := eq_or_ne x b <;>
simp [*, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne]
end Equiv
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Function.lean | 1,948 | 1,950 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.BilinearForm.Properties
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.SesquilinearForm
/-!
# Bilinear form
This file defines the conversion between bilinear forms and matrices.
## Main definitions
* `Matrix.toBilin` given a basis define a bilinear form
* `Matrix.toBilin'` define the bilinear form on `n → R`
* `BilinForm.toMatrix`: calculate the matrix coefficients of a bilinear form
* `BilinForm.toMatrix'`: calculate the matrix coefficients of a bilinear form on `n → R`
## Notations
In this file we use the following type variables:
- `M₁` is a module over the commutative semiring `R₁`,
- `M₂` is a module over the commutative ring `R₂`.
## Tags
bilinear form, bilin form, BilinearForm, matrix, basis
-/
open LinearMap (BilinForm)
variable {R₁ : Type*} {M₁ : Type*} [CommSemiring R₁] [AddCommMonoid M₁] [Module R₁ M₁]
variable {R₂ : Type*} {M₂ : Type*} [CommRing R₂] [AddCommGroup M₂] [Module R₂ M₂]
section Matrix
variable {n o : Type*}
open Finset LinearMap Matrix
open Matrix
/-- The map from `Matrix n n R` to bilinear forms on `n → R`.
This is an auxiliary definition for the equivalence `Matrix.toBilin'`. -/
def Matrix.toBilin'Aux [Fintype n] (M : Matrix n n R₁) : BilinForm R₁ (n → R₁) :=
Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux _ _ M
theorem Matrix.toBilin'Aux_single [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] (M : Matrix n n R₁) (i j : n) :
M.toBilin'Aux (Pi.single i 1) (Pi.single j 1) = M i j :=
Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux_single _ _ _ _ _
/-- The linear map from bilinear forms to `Matrix n n R` given an `n`-indexed basis.
This is an auxiliary definition for the equivalence `Matrix.toBilin'`. -/
def BilinForm.toMatrixAux (b : n → M₁) : BilinForm R₁ M₁ →ₗ[R₁] Matrix n n R₁ :=
LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux R₁ b b
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.BilinForm.toMatrixAux_apply (B : BilinForm R₁ M₁) (b : n → M₁) (i j : n) :
BilinForm.toMatrixAux b B i j = B (b i) (b j) :=
LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux_apply R₁ B _ _ _ _
variable [Fintype n] [Fintype o]
theorem toBilin'Aux_toMatrixAux [DecidableEq n] (B₂ : BilinForm R₁ (n → R₁)) :
Matrix.toBilin'Aux (BilinForm.toMatrixAux (fun j => Pi.single j 1) B₂) = B₂ := by
rw [BilinForm.toMatrixAux, Matrix.toBilin'Aux, toLinearMap₂'Aux_toMatrix₂Aux]
section ToMatrix'
/-! ### `ToMatrix'` section
This section deals with the conversion between matrices and bilinear forms on `n → R₂`.
-/
variable [DecidableEq n] [DecidableEq o]
/-- The linear equivalence between bilinear forms on `n → R` and `n × n` matrices -/
def LinearMap.BilinForm.toMatrix' : BilinForm R₁ (n → R₁) ≃ₗ[R₁] Matrix n n R₁ :=
LinearMap.toMatrix₂' R₁
/-- The linear equivalence between `n × n` matrices and bilinear forms on `n → R` -/
def Matrix.toBilin' : Matrix n n R₁ ≃ₗ[R₁] BilinForm R₁ (n → R₁) :=
BilinForm.toMatrix'.symm
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toBilin'Aux_eq (M : Matrix n n R₁) : Matrix.toBilin'Aux M = Matrix.toBilin' M :=
rfl
theorem Matrix.toBilin'_apply (M : Matrix n n R₁) (x y : n → R₁) :
Matrix.toBilin' M x y = ∑ i, ∑ j, x i * M i j * y j :=
(Matrix.toLinearMap₂'_apply _ _ _).trans
(by simp only [smul_eq_mul, mul_assoc, mul_comm, mul_left_comm])
theorem Matrix.toBilin'_apply' (M : Matrix n n R₁) (v w : n → R₁) :
Matrix.toBilin' M v w = dotProduct v (M *ᵥ w) := Matrix.toLinearMap₂'_apply' _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toBilin'_single (M : Matrix n n R₁) (i j : n) :
Matrix.toBilin' M (Pi.single i 1) (Pi.single j 1) = M i j := by
simp [Matrix.toBilin'_apply, Pi.single_apply]
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.BilinForm.toMatrix'_symm :
(BilinForm.toMatrix'.symm : Matrix n n R₁ ≃ₗ[R₁] _) = Matrix.toBilin' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toBilin'_symm :
(Matrix.toBilin'.symm : _ ≃ₗ[R₁] Matrix n n R₁) = BilinForm.toMatrix' :=
BilinForm.toMatrix'.symm_symm
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toBilin'_toMatrix' (B : BilinForm R₁ (n → R₁)) :
Matrix.toBilin' (BilinForm.toMatrix' B) = B :=
Matrix.toBilin'.apply_symm_apply B
namespace LinearMap
@[simp]
theorem BilinForm.toMatrix'_toBilin' (M : Matrix n n R₁) :
BilinForm.toMatrix' (Matrix.toBilin' M) = M :=
(LinearMap.toMatrix₂' R₁).apply_symm_apply M
@[simp]
theorem BilinForm.toMatrix'_apply (B : BilinForm R₁ (n → R₁)) (i j : n) :
BilinForm.toMatrix' B i j = B (Pi.single i 1) (Pi.single j 1) :=
LinearMap.toMatrix₂'_apply _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem BilinForm.toMatrix'_comp (B : BilinForm R₁ (n → R₁)) (l r : (o → R₁) →ₗ[R₁] n → R₁) :
(B.comp l r).toMatrix' = l.toMatrix'ᵀ * B.toMatrix' * r.toMatrix' :=
B.toMatrix₂'_compl₁₂ _ _
theorem BilinForm.toMatrix'_compLeft (B : BilinForm R₁ (n → R₁)) (f : (n → R₁) →ₗ[R₁] n → R₁) :
(B.compLeft f).toMatrix' = f.toMatrix'ᵀ * B.toMatrix' :=
B.toMatrix₂'_comp _
theorem BilinForm.toMatrix'_compRight (B : BilinForm R₁ (n → R₁)) (f : (n → R₁) →ₗ[R₁] n → R₁) :
(B.compRight f).toMatrix' = B.toMatrix' * f.toMatrix' :=
B.toMatrix₂'_compl₂ _
theorem BilinForm.mul_toMatrix'_mul (B : BilinForm R₁ (n → R₁)) (M : Matrix o n R₁)
(N : Matrix n o R₁) : M * B.toMatrix' * N = (B.comp (Mᵀ).toLin' N.toLin').toMatrix' :=
B.mul_toMatrix₂'_mul _ _
theorem BilinForm.mul_toMatrix' (B : BilinForm R₁ (n → R₁)) (M : Matrix n n R₁) :
M * B.toMatrix' = (B.compLeft (Mᵀ).toLin').toMatrix' :=
LinearMap.mul_toMatrix' B _
theorem BilinForm.toMatrix'_mul (B : BilinForm R₁ (n → R₁)) (M : Matrix n n R₁) :
BilinForm.toMatrix' B * M = BilinForm.toMatrix' (B.compRight (Matrix.toLin' M)) :=
B.toMatrix₂'_mul _
end LinearMap
theorem Matrix.toBilin'_comp (M : Matrix n n R₁) (P Q : Matrix n o R₁) :
M.toBilin'.comp P.toLin' Q.toLin' = (Pᵀ * M * Q).toBilin' :=
BilinForm.toMatrix'.injective
(by simp only [BilinForm.toMatrix'_comp, BilinForm.toMatrix'_toBilin', toMatrix'_toLin'])
end ToMatrix'
section ToMatrix
/-! ### `ToMatrix` section
This section deals with the conversion between matrices and bilinear forms on
a module with a fixed basis.
-/
variable [DecidableEq n] (b : Basis n R₁ M₁)
/-- `BilinForm.toMatrix b` is the equivalence between `R`-bilinear forms on `M` and
`n`-by-`n` matrices with entries in `R`, if `b` is an `R`-basis for `M`. -/
noncomputable def BilinForm.toMatrix : BilinForm R₁ M₁ ≃ₗ[R₁] Matrix n n R₁ :=
LinearMap.toMatrix₂ b b
/-- `BilinForm.toMatrix b` is the equivalence between `R`-bilinear forms on `M` and
`n`-by-`n` matrices with entries in `R`, if `b` is an `R`-basis for `M`. -/
noncomputable def Matrix.toBilin : Matrix n n R₁ ≃ₗ[R₁] BilinForm R₁ M₁ :=
(BilinForm.toMatrix b).symm
@[simp]
theorem BilinForm.toMatrix_apply (B : BilinForm R₁ M₁) (i j : n) :
BilinForm.toMatrix b B i j = B (b i) (b j) :=
LinearMap.toMatrix₂_apply _ _ B _ _
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toBilin_apply (M : Matrix n n R₁) (x y : M₁) :
Matrix.toBilin b M x y = ∑ i, ∑ j, b.repr x i * M i j * b.repr y j :=
(Matrix.toLinearMap₂_apply _ _ _ _ _).trans
(by simp only [smul_eq_mul, mul_assoc, mul_comm, mul_left_comm])
-- Not a `simp` lemma since `BilinForm.toMatrix` needs an extra argument
theorem BilinearForm.toMatrixAux_eq (B : BilinForm R₁ M₁) :
BilinForm.toMatrixAux (R₁ := R₁) b B = BilinForm.toMatrix b B :=
LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux_eq _ _ B
@[simp]
theorem BilinForm.toMatrix_symm : (BilinForm.toMatrix b).symm = Matrix.toBilin b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toBilin_symm : (Matrix.toBilin b).symm = BilinForm.toMatrix b :=
(BilinForm.toMatrix b).symm_symm
theorem Matrix.toBilin_basisFun : Matrix.toBilin (Pi.basisFun R₁ n) = Matrix.toBilin' := by
ext M
simp only [coe_comp, coe_single, Function.comp_apply, toBilin_apply, Pi.basisFun_repr,
toBilin'_apply]
theorem BilinForm.toMatrix_basisFun :
BilinForm.toMatrix (Pi.basisFun R₁ n) = BilinForm.toMatrix' := by
rw [BilinForm.toMatrix, BilinForm.toMatrix', LinearMap.toMatrix₂_basisFun]
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toBilin_toMatrix (B : BilinForm R₁ M₁) :
Matrix.toBilin b (BilinForm.toMatrix b B) = B :=
(Matrix.toBilin b).apply_symm_apply B
@[simp]
theorem BilinForm.toMatrix_toBilin (M : Matrix n n R₁) :
BilinForm.toMatrix b (Matrix.toBilin b M) = M :=
(BilinForm.toMatrix b).apply_symm_apply M
variable {M₂' : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M₂'] [Module R₁ M₂']
variable (c : Basis o R₁ M₂')
variable [DecidableEq o]
-- Cannot be a `simp` lemma because `b` must be inferred.
theorem BilinForm.toMatrix_comp (B : BilinForm R₁ M₁) (l r : M₂' →ₗ[R₁] M₁) :
BilinForm.toMatrix c (B.comp l r) =
(LinearMap.toMatrix c b l)ᵀ * BilinForm.toMatrix b B * LinearMap.toMatrix c b r :=
LinearMap.toMatrix₂_compl₁₂ _ _ _ _ B _ _
theorem BilinForm.toMatrix_compLeft (B : BilinForm R₁ M₁) (f : M₁ →ₗ[R₁] M₁) :
BilinForm.toMatrix b (B.compLeft f) = (LinearMap.toMatrix b b f)ᵀ * BilinForm.toMatrix b B :=
LinearMap.toMatrix₂_comp _ _ _ B _
theorem BilinForm.toMatrix_compRight (B : BilinForm R₁ M₁) (f : M₁ →ₗ[R₁] M₁) :
BilinForm.toMatrix b (B.compRight f) = BilinForm.toMatrix b B * LinearMap.toMatrix b b f :=
LinearMap.toMatrix₂_compl₂ _ _ _ B _
@[simp]
theorem BilinForm.toMatrix_mul_basis_toMatrix (c : Basis o R₁ M₁) (B : BilinForm R₁ M₁) :
(b.toMatrix c)ᵀ * BilinForm.toMatrix b B * b.toMatrix c = BilinForm.toMatrix c B :=
LinearMap.toMatrix₂_mul_basis_toMatrix _ _ _ _ B
theorem BilinForm.mul_toMatrix_mul (B : BilinForm R₁ M₁) (M : Matrix o n R₁) (N : Matrix n o R₁) :
M * BilinForm.toMatrix b B * N =
BilinForm.toMatrix c (B.comp (Matrix.toLin c b Mᵀ) (Matrix.toLin c b N)) :=
LinearMap.mul_toMatrix₂_mul _ _ _ _ B _ _
theorem BilinForm.mul_toMatrix (B : BilinForm R₁ M₁) (M : Matrix n n R₁) :
M * BilinForm.toMatrix b B = BilinForm.toMatrix b (B.compLeft (Matrix.toLin b b Mᵀ)) :=
LinearMap.mul_toMatrix₂ _ _ _ B _
theorem BilinForm.toMatrix_mul (B : BilinForm R₁ M₁) (M : Matrix n n R₁) :
BilinForm.toMatrix b B * M = BilinForm.toMatrix b (B.compRight (Matrix.toLin b b M)) :=
LinearMap.toMatrix₂_mul _ _ _ B _
theorem Matrix.toBilin_comp (M : Matrix n n R₁) (P Q : Matrix n o R₁) :
(Matrix.toBilin b M).comp (toLin c b P) (toLin c b Q) = Matrix.toBilin c (Pᵀ * M * Q) := by
ext x y
rw [Matrix.toBilin, BilinForm.toMatrix, Matrix.toBilin, BilinForm.toMatrix, toMatrix₂_symm,
toMatrix₂_symm, ← Matrix.toLinearMap₂_compl₁₂ b b c c]
simp
end ToMatrix
end Matrix
section MatrixAdjoints
open Matrix
variable {n : Type*} [Fintype n]
variable (b : Basis n R₂ M₂)
variable (J J₃ A A' : Matrix n n R₂)
theorem Matrix.isAdjointPair_equiv' [DecidableEq n] (P : Matrix n n R₂) (h : IsUnit P) :
(Pᵀ * J * P).IsAdjointPair (Pᵀ * J * P) A A' ↔
J.IsAdjointPair J (P * A * P⁻¹) (P * A' * P⁻¹) :=
Matrix.isAdjointPair_equiv _ _ _ _ h
variable [DecidableEq n]
theorem mem_pairSelfAdjointMatricesSubmodule' :
A ∈ pairSelfAdjointMatricesSubmodule J J₃ ↔ Matrix.IsAdjointPair J J₃ A A := by
simp only [mem_pairSelfAdjointMatricesSubmodule]
/-- The submodule of self-adjoint matrices with respect to the bilinear form corresponding to
the matrix `J`. -/
def selfAdjointMatricesSubmodule' : Submodule R₂ (Matrix n n R₂) :=
pairSelfAdjointMatricesSubmodule J J
theorem mem_selfAdjointMatricesSubmodule' :
A ∈ selfAdjointMatricesSubmodule J ↔ J.IsSelfAdjoint A := by
simp only [mem_selfAdjointMatricesSubmodule]
/-- The submodule of skew-adjoint matrices with respect to the bilinear form corresponding to
the matrix `J`. -/
def skewAdjointMatricesSubmodule' : Submodule R₂ (Matrix n n R₂) :=
pairSelfAdjointMatricesSubmodule (-J) J
theorem mem_skewAdjointMatricesSubmodule' :
A ∈ skewAdjointMatricesSubmodule J ↔ J.IsSkewAdjoint A := by
simp only [mem_skewAdjointMatricesSubmodule]
end MatrixAdjoints
namespace LinearMap
namespace BilinForm
section Det
open Matrix
variable {A : Type*} [CommRing A] [IsDomain A] [Module A M₂] (B₃ : BilinForm A M₂)
variable {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι]
theorem _root_.Matrix.nondegenerate_toBilin'_iff_nondegenerate_toBilin {M : Matrix ι ι R₁}
(b : Basis ι R₁ M₁) : M.toBilin'.Nondegenerate ↔ (Matrix.toBilin b M).Nondegenerate :=
(nondegenerate_congr_iff b.equivFun.symm).symm
-- Lemmas transferring nondegeneracy between a matrix and its associated bilinear form
theorem _root_.Matrix.Nondegenerate.toBilin' {M : Matrix ι ι R₂} (h : M.Nondegenerate) :
M.toBilin'.Nondegenerate := fun x hx =>
h.eq_zero_of_ortho fun y => by simpa only [toBilin'_apply'] using hx y
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Matrix.nondegenerate_toBilin'_iff {M : Matrix ι ι R₂} :
M.toBilin'.Nondegenerate ↔ M.Nondegenerate :=
⟨fun h v hv => h v fun w => (M.toBilin'_apply' _ _).trans <| hv w, Matrix.Nondegenerate.toBilin'⟩
theorem _root_.Matrix.Nondegenerate.toBilin {M : Matrix ι ι R₂} (h : M.Nondegenerate)
(b : Basis ι R₂ M₂) : (Matrix.toBilin b M).Nondegenerate :=
(Matrix.nondegenerate_toBilin'_iff_nondegenerate_toBilin b).mp h.toBilin'
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Matrix.nondegenerate_toBilin_iff {M : Matrix ι ι R₂} (b : Basis ι R₂ M₂) :
(Matrix.toBilin b M).Nondegenerate ↔ M.Nondegenerate := by
rw [← Matrix.nondegenerate_toBilin'_iff_nondegenerate_toBilin, Matrix.nondegenerate_toBilin'_iff]
/-! Lemmas transferring nondegeneracy between a bilinear form and its associated matrix -/
@[simp]
theorem nondegenerate_toMatrix'_iff {B : BilinForm R₂ (ι → R₂)} :
B.toMatrix'.Nondegenerate (m := ι) ↔ B.Nondegenerate :=
Matrix.nondegenerate_toBilin'_iff.symm.trans <| (Matrix.toBilin'_toMatrix' B).symm ▸ Iff.rfl
theorem Nondegenerate.toMatrix' {B : BilinForm R₂ (ι → R₂)} (h : B.Nondegenerate) :
B.toMatrix'.Nondegenerate :=
nondegenerate_toMatrix'_iff.mpr h
@[simp]
theorem nondegenerate_toMatrix_iff {B : BilinForm R₂ M₂} (b : Basis ι R₂ M₂) :
(BilinForm.toMatrix b B).Nondegenerate ↔ B.Nondegenerate :=
(Matrix.nondegenerate_toBilin_iff b).symm.trans <| (Matrix.toBilin_toMatrix b B).symm ▸ Iff.rfl
theorem Nondegenerate.toMatrix {B : BilinForm R₂ M₂} (h : B.Nondegenerate) (b : Basis ι R₂ M₂) :
(BilinForm.toMatrix b B).Nondegenerate :=
(nondegenerate_toMatrix_iff b).mpr h
/-! Some shorthands for combining the above with `Matrix.nondegenerate_of_det_ne_zero` -/
theorem nondegenerate_toBilin'_iff_det_ne_zero {M : Matrix ι ι A} :
M.toBilin'.Nondegenerate ↔ M.det ≠ 0 := by
rw [Matrix.nondegenerate_toBilin'_iff, Matrix.nondegenerate_iff_det_ne_zero]
theorem nondegenerate_toBilin'_of_det_ne_zero' (M : Matrix ι ι A) (h : M.det ≠ 0) :
M.toBilin'.Nondegenerate :=
nondegenerate_toBilin'_iff_det_ne_zero.mpr h
theorem nondegenerate_iff_det_ne_zero {B : BilinForm A M₂} (b : Basis ι A M₂) :
B.Nondegenerate ↔ (BilinForm.toMatrix b B).det ≠ 0 := by
rw [← Matrix.nondegenerate_iff_det_ne_zero, nondegenerate_toMatrix_iff]
theorem nondegenerate_of_det_ne_zero (b : Basis ι A M₂) (h : (BilinForm.toMatrix b B₃).det ≠ 0) :
B₃.Nondegenerate :=
| (nondegenerate_iff_det_ne_zero b).mpr h
end Det
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/BilinearForm.lean | 389 | 391 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.NoZeroSMulDivisors.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Int.ModEq
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.QuotientGroup.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.ZPowers.Basic
/-!
# Equality modulo an element
This file defines equality modulo an element in a commutative group.
## Main definitions
* `a ≡ b [PMOD p]`: `a` and `b` are congruent modulo `p`.
## See also
`SModEq` is a generalisation to arbitrary submodules.
## TODO
Delete `Int.ModEq` in favour of `AddCommGroup.ModEq`. Generalise `SModEq` to `AddSubgroup` and
redefine `AddCommGroup.ModEq` using it. Once this is done, we can rename `AddCommGroup.ModEq`
to `AddSubgroup.ModEq` and multiplicativise it. Longer term, we could generalise to submonoids and
also unify with `Nat.ModEq`.
-/
namespace AddCommGroup
variable {α : Type*}
section AddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup α] {p a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c : α} {n : ℕ} {z : ℤ}
/-- `a ≡ b [PMOD p]` means that `b` is congruent to `a` modulo `p`.
Equivalently (as shown in `Algebra.Order.ToIntervalMod`), `b` does not lie in the open interval
`(a, a + p)` modulo `p`, or `toIcoMod hp a` disagrees with `toIocMod hp a` at `b`, or
`toIcoDiv hp a` disagrees with `toIocDiv hp a` at `b`. -/
def ModEq (p a b : α) : Prop :=
∃ z : ℤ, b - a = z • p
@[inherit_doc]
notation:50 a " ≡ " b " [PMOD " p "]" => ModEq p a b
@[refl, simp]
theorem modEq_refl (a : α) : a ≡ a [PMOD p] :=
⟨0, by simp⟩
theorem modEq_rfl : a ≡ a [PMOD p] :=
modEq_refl _
theorem modEq_comm : a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ b ≡ a [PMOD p] :=
(Equiv.neg _).exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [ModEq, ← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg]
alias ⟨ModEq.symm, _⟩ := modEq_comm
attribute [symm] ModEq.symm
@[trans]
theorem ModEq.trans : a ≡ b [PMOD p] → b ≡ c [PMOD p] → a ≡ c [PMOD p] := fun ⟨m, hm⟩ ⟨n, hn⟩ =>
⟨m + n, by simp [add_smul, ← hm, ← hn]⟩
instance : IsRefl _ (ModEq p) :=
⟨modEq_refl⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_modEq_neg : -a ≡ -b [PMOD p] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_comm.trans <| by simp [ModEq, neg_add_eq_sub]
alias ⟨ModEq.of_neg, ModEq.neg⟩ := neg_modEq_neg
@[simp]
theorem modEq_neg : a ≡ b [PMOD -p] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_comm.trans <| by simp [ModEq, ← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg]
alias ⟨ModEq.of_neg', ModEq.neg'⟩ := modEq_neg
theorem modEq_sub (a b : α) : a ≡ b [PMOD b - a] :=
⟨1, (one_smul _ _).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem modEq_zero : a ≡ b [PMOD 0] ↔ a = b := by simp [ModEq, sub_eq_zero, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem self_modEq_zero : p ≡ 0 [PMOD p] :=
⟨-1, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem zsmul_modEq_zero (z : ℤ) : z • p ≡ 0 [PMOD p] :=
⟨-z, by simp⟩
theorem add_zsmul_modEq (z : ℤ) : a + z • p ≡ a [PMOD p] :=
⟨-z, by simp⟩
theorem zsmul_add_modEq (z : ℤ) : z • p + a ≡ a [PMOD p] :=
⟨-z, by simp [← sub_sub]⟩
theorem add_nsmul_modEq (n : ℕ) : a + n • p ≡ a [PMOD p] :=
⟨-n, by simp⟩
theorem nsmul_add_modEq (n : ℕ) : n • p + a ≡ a [PMOD p] :=
⟨-n, by simp [← sub_sub]⟩
namespace ModEq
protected theorem add_zsmul (z : ℤ) : a ≡ b [PMOD p] → a + z • p ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
(add_zsmul_modEq _).trans
protected theorem zsmul_add (z : ℤ) : a ≡ b [PMOD p] → z • p + a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
(zsmul_add_modEq _).trans
protected theorem add_nsmul (n : ℕ) : a ≡ b [PMOD p] → a + n • p ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
(add_nsmul_modEq _).trans
protected theorem nsmul_add (n : ℕ) : a ≡ b [PMOD p] → n • p + a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
(nsmul_add_modEq _).trans
protected theorem of_zsmul : a ≡ b [PMOD z • p] → a ≡ b [PMOD p] := fun ⟨m, hm⟩ =>
⟨m * z, by rwa [mul_smul]⟩
protected theorem of_nsmul : a ≡ b [PMOD n • p] → a ≡ b [PMOD p] := fun ⟨m, hm⟩ =>
⟨m * n, by rwa [mul_smul, natCast_zsmul]⟩
protected theorem zsmul : a ≡ b [PMOD p] → z • a ≡ z • b [PMOD z • p] :=
Exists.imp fun m hm => by rw [← smul_sub, hm, smul_comm]
protected theorem nsmul : a ≡ b [PMOD p] → n • a ≡ n • b [PMOD n • p] :=
Exists.imp fun m hm => by rw [← smul_sub, hm, smul_comm]
end ModEq
@[simp]
theorem zsmul_modEq_zsmul [NoZeroSMulDivisors ℤ α] (hn : z ≠ 0) :
z • a ≡ z • b [PMOD z • p] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
exists_congr fun m => by rw [← smul_sub, smul_comm, smul_right_inj hn]
@[simp]
theorem nsmul_modEq_nsmul [NoZeroSMulDivisors ℕ α] (hn : n ≠ 0) :
n • a ≡ n • b [PMOD n • p] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
exists_congr fun m => by rw [← smul_sub, smul_comm, smul_right_inj hn]
alias ⟨ModEq.zsmul_cancel, _⟩ := zsmul_modEq_zsmul
alias ⟨ModEq.nsmul_cancel, _⟩ := nsmul_modEq_nsmul
namespace ModEq
@[simp]
protected theorem add_iff_left :
a₁ ≡ b₁ [PMOD p] → (a₁ + a₂ ≡ b₁ + b₂ [PMOD p] ↔ a₂ ≡ b₂ [PMOD p]) := fun ⟨m, hm⟩ =>
(Equiv.addLeft m).symm.exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [add_sub_add_comm, hm, add_smul, ModEq]
@[simp]
protected theorem add_iff_right :
a₂ ≡ b₂ [PMOD p] → (a₁ + a₂ ≡ b₁ + b₂ [PMOD p] ↔ a₁ ≡ b₁ [PMOD p]) := fun ⟨m, hm⟩ =>
(Equiv.addRight m).symm.exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [add_sub_add_comm, hm, add_smul, ModEq]
@[simp]
protected theorem sub_iff_left :
| a₁ ≡ b₁ [PMOD p] → (a₁ - a₂ ≡ b₁ - b₂ [PMOD p] ↔ a₂ ≡ b₂ [PMOD p]) := fun ⟨m, hm⟩ =>
(Equiv.subLeft m).symm.exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [sub_sub_sub_comm, hm, sub_smul, ModEq]
| Mathlib/Algebra/ModEq.lean | 168 | 170 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Markus Himmel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Markus Himmel
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Balanced
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.LiftingProperties.Basic
/-!
# Strong epimorphisms
In this file, we define strong epimorphisms. A strong epimorphism is an epimorphism `f`
which has the (unique) left lifting property with respect to monomorphisms. Similarly,
a strong monomorphisms in a monomorphism which has the (unique) right lifting property
with respect to epimorphisms.
## Main results
Besides the definition, we show that
* the composition of two strong epimorphisms is a strong epimorphism,
* if `f ≫ g` is a strong epimorphism, then so is `g`,
* if `f` is both a strong epimorphism and a monomorphism, then it is an isomorphism
We also define classes `StrongMonoCategory` and `StrongEpiCategory` for categories in which
every monomorphism or epimorphism is strong, and deduce that these categories are balanced.
## TODO
Show that the dual of a strong epimorphism is a strong monomorphism, and vice versa.
## References
* [F. Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra 1*][borceux-vol1]
-/
universe v u
namespace CategoryTheory
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable {P Q : C}
/-- A strong epimorphism `f` is an epimorphism which has the left lifting property
with respect to monomorphisms. -/
class StrongEpi (f : P ⟶ Q) : Prop where
/-- The epimorphism condition on `f` -/
epi : Epi f
/-- The left lifting property with respect to all monomorphism -/
llp : ∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (z : X ⟶ Y) [Mono z], HasLiftingProperty f z
theorem StrongEpi.mk' {f : P ⟶ Q} [Epi f]
(hf : ∀ (X Y : C) (z : X ⟶ Y)
(_ : Mono z) (u : P ⟶ X) (v : Q ⟶ Y) (sq : CommSq u f z v), sq.HasLift) :
StrongEpi f :=
{ epi := inferInstance
llp := fun {X Y} z hz => ⟨fun {u v} sq => hf X Y z hz u v sq⟩ }
/-- A strong monomorphism `f` is a monomorphism which has the right lifting property
with respect to epimorphisms. -/
class StrongMono (f : P ⟶ Q) : Prop where
/-- The monomorphism condition on `f` -/
mono : Mono f
/-- The right lifting property with respect to all epimorphisms -/
rlp : ∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (z : X ⟶ Y) [Epi z], HasLiftingProperty z f
theorem StrongMono.mk' {f : P ⟶ Q} [Mono f]
(hf : ∀ (X Y : C) (z : X ⟶ Y) (_ : Epi z) (u : X ⟶ P)
(v : Y ⟶ Q) (sq : CommSq u z f v), sq.HasLift) : StrongMono f where
mono := inferInstance
rlp := fun {X Y} z hz => ⟨fun {u v} sq => hf X Y z hz u v sq⟩
attribute [instance 100] StrongEpi.llp
attribute [instance 100] StrongMono.rlp
instance (priority := 100) epi_of_strongEpi (f : P ⟶ Q) [StrongEpi f] : Epi f :=
StrongEpi.epi
instance (priority := 100) mono_of_strongMono (f : P ⟶ Q) [StrongMono f] : Mono f :=
StrongMono.mono
section
variable {R : C} (f : P ⟶ Q) (g : Q ⟶ R)
/-- The composition of two strong epimorphisms is a strong epimorphism. -/
theorem strongEpi_comp [StrongEpi f] [StrongEpi g] : StrongEpi (f ≫ g) :=
{ epi := epi_comp _ _
llp := by
intros
infer_instance }
/-- The composition of two strong monomorphisms is a strong monomorphism. -/
theorem strongMono_comp [StrongMono f] [StrongMono g] : StrongMono (f ≫ g) :=
{ mono := mono_comp _ _
rlp := by
intros
infer_instance }
/-- If `f ≫ g` is a strong epimorphism, then so is `g`. -/
theorem strongEpi_of_strongEpi [StrongEpi (f ≫ g)] : StrongEpi g :=
{ epi := epi_of_epi f g
llp := fun {X Y} z _ => by
constructor
intro u v sq
have h₀ : (f ≫ u) ≫ z = (f ≫ g) ≫ v := by simp only [Category.assoc, sq.w]
exact
CommSq.HasLift.mk'
⟨(CommSq.mk h₀).lift, by
simp only [← cancel_mono z, Category.assoc, CommSq.fac_right, sq.w], by simp⟩ }
/-- If `f ≫ g` is a strong monomorphism, then so is `f`. -/
theorem strongMono_of_strongMono [StrongMono (f ≫ g)] : StrongMono f :=
{ mono := mono_of_mono f g
rlp := fun {X Y} z => by
intros
constructor
intro u v sq
have h₀ : u ≫ f ≫ g = z ≫ v ≫ g := by
rw [← Category.assoc, eq_whisker sq.w, Category.assoc]
exact CommSq.HasLift.mk' ⟨(CommSq.mk h₀).lift, by simp, by simp [← cancel_epi z, sq.w]⟩ }
/-- An isomorphism is in particular a strong epimorphism. -/
instance (priority := 100) strongEpi_of_isIso [IsIso f] : StrongEpi f where
epi := by infer_instance
llp {_ _} _ := HasLiftingProperty.of_left_iso _ _
/-- An isomorphism is in particular a strong monomorphism. -/
instance (priority := 100) strongMono_of_isIso [IsIso f] : StrongMono f where
mono := by infer_instance
rlp {_ _} _ := HasLiftingProperty.of_right_iso _ _
theorem StrongEpi.of_arrow_iso {A B A' B' : C} {f : A ⟶ B} {g : A' ⟶ B'}
(e : Arrow.mk f ≅ Arrow.mk g) [h : StrongEpi f] : StrongEpi g :=
{ epi := by
rw [Arrow.iso_w' e]
infer_instance
llp := fun {X Y} z => by
intro
apply HasLiftingProperty.of_arrow_iso_left e z }
theorem StrongMono.of_arrow_iso {A B A' B' : C} {f : A ⟶ B} {g : A' ⟶ B'}
(e : Arrow.mk f ≅ Arrow.mk g) [h : StrongMono f] : StrongMono g :=
{ mono := by
rw [Arrow.iso_w' e]
infer_instance
rlp := fun {X Y} z => by
intro
apply HasLiftingProperty.of_arrow_iso_right z e }
theorem StrongEpi.iff_of_arrow_iso {A B A' B' : C} {f : A ⟶ B} {g : A' ⟶ B'}
(e : Arrow.mk f ≅ Arrow.mk g) : StrongEpi f ↔ StrongEpi g := by
constructor <;> intro
exacts [StrongEpi.of_arrow_iso e, StrongEpi.of_arrow_iso e.symm]
theorem StrongMono.iff_of_arrow_iso {A B A' B' : C} {f : A ⟶ B} {g : A' ⟶ B'}
(e : Arrow.mk f ≅ Arrow.mk g) : StrongMono f ↔ StrongMono g := by
constructor <;> intro
exacts [StrongMono.of_arrow_iso e, StrongMono.of_arrow_iso e.symm]
end
/-- A strong epimorphism that is a monomorphism is an isomorphism. -/
theorem isIso_of_mono_of_strongEpi (f : P ⟶ Q) [Mono f] [StrongEpi f] : IsIso f :=
⟨⟨(CommSq.mk (show 𝟙 P ≫ f = f ≫ 𝟙 Q by simp)).lift, by simp⟩⟩
/-- A strong monomorphism that is an epimorphism is an isomorphism. -/
theorem isIso_of_epi_of_strongMono (f : P ⟶ Q) [Epi f] [StrongMono f] : IsIso f :=
⟨⟨(CommSq.mk (show 𝟙 P ≫ f = f ≫ 𝟙 Q by simp)).lift, by simp⟩⟩
|
section
variable (C)
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/StrongEpi.lean | 172 | 175 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Vector.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.List.Nodup
import Mathlib.Data.List.OfFn
import Mathlib.Data.List.Scan
import Mathlib.Control.Applicative
import Mathlib.Control.Traversable.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.List.Basic
/-!
# Additional theorems and definitions about the `Vector` type
This file introduces the infix notation `::ᵥ` for `Vector.cons`.
-/
universe u
variable {α β γ σ φ : Type*} {m n : ℕ}
namespace List.Vector
@[inherit_doc]
infixr:67 " ::ᵥ " => Vector.cons
attribute [simp] head_cons tail_cons
instance [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (Vector α n) :=
⟨ofFn default⟩
theorem toList_injective : Function.Injective (@toList α n) :=
Subtype.val_injective
/-- Two `v w : Vector α n` are equal iff they are equal at every single index. -/
@[ext]
theorem ext : ∀ {v w : Vector α n} (_ : ∀ m : Fin n, Vector.get v m = Vector.get w m), v = w
| ⟨v, hv⟩, ⟨w, hw⟩, h =>
Subtype.eq (List.ext_get (by rw [hv, hw]) fun m hm _ => h ⟨m, hv ▸ hm⟩)
/-- The empty `Vector` is a `Subsingleton`. -/
instance zero_subsingleton : Subsingleton (Vector α 0) :=
⟨fun _ _ => Vector.ext fun m => Fin.elim0 m⟩
@[simp]
theorem cons_val (a : α) : ∀ v : Vector α n, (a ::ᵥ v).val = a :: v.val
| ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
theorem eq_cons_iff (a : α) (v : Vector α n.succ) (v' : Vector α n) :
v = a ::ᵥ v' ↔ v.head = a ∧ v.tail = v' :=
⟨fun h => h.symm ▸ ⟨head_cons a v', tail_cons a v'⟩, fun h =>
_root_.trans (cons_head_tail v).symm (by rw [h.1, h.2])⟩
theorem ne_cons_iff (a : α) (v : Vector α n.succ) (v' : Vector α n) :
v ≠ a ::ᵥ v' ↔ v.head ≠ a ∨ v.tail ≠ v' := by rw [Ne, eq_cons_iff a v v', not_and_or]
theorem exists_eq_cons (v : Vector α n.succ) : ∃ (a : α) (as : Vector α n), v = a ::ᵥ as :=
⟨v.head, v.tail, (eq_cons_iff v.head v v.tail).2 ⟨rfl, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem toList_ofFn : ∀ {n} (f : Fin n → α), toList (ofFn f) = List.ofFn f
| 0, f => by rw [ofFn, List.ofFn_zero, toList, nil]
| n + 1, f => by rw [ofFn, List.ofFn_succ, toList_cons, toList_ofFn]
@[simp]
theorem mk_toList : ∀ (v : Vector α n) (h), (⟨toList v, h⟩ : Vector α n) = v
| ⟨_, _⟩, _ => rfl
@[simp] theorem length_val (v : Vector α n) : v.val.length = n := v.2
@[simp]
theorem pmap_cons {p : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → p a → β) (a : α) (v : Vector α n)
(hp : ∀ x ∈ (cons a v).toList, p x) :
(cons a v).pmap f hp = cons (f a (by
simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, toList_cons, List.mem_cons, forall_eq_or_imp] at hp
exact hp.1))
(v.pmap f (by
simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, toList_cons, List.mem_cons, forall_eq_or_imp] at hp
exact hp.2)) := rfl
/-- Opposite direction of `Vector.pmap_cons` -/
theorem pmap_cons' {p : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → p a → β) (a : α) (v : Vector α n)
(ha : p a) (hp : ∀ x ∈ v.toList, p x) :
cons (f a ha) (v.pmap f hp) = (cons a v).pmap f (by simpa [ha]) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toList_map {β : Type*} (v : Vector α n) (f : α → β) :
(v.map f).toList = v.toList.map f := by cases v; rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_map {β : Type*} (v : Vector α (n + 1)) (f : α → β) : (v.map f).head = f v.head := by
obtain ⟨a, v', h⟩ := Vector.exists_eq_cons v
rw [h, map_cons, head_cons, head_cons]
@[simp]
theorem tail_map {β : Type*} (v : Vector α (n + 1)) (f : α → β) :
(v.map f).tail = v.tail.map f := by
obtain ⟨a, v', h⟩ := Vector.exists_eq_cons v
rw [h, map_cons, tail_cons, tail_cons]
@[simp]
theorem getElem_map {β : Type*} (v : Vector α n) (f : α → β) {i : ℕ} (hi : i < n) :
(v.map f)[i] = f v[i] := by
simp only [getElem_def, toList_map, List.getElem_map]
@[simp]
theorem toList_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → p a → β) (v : Vector α n)
(hp : ∀ x ∈ v.toList, p x) :
(v.pmap f hp).toList = v.toList.pmap f hp := by cases v; rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → p a → β) (v : Vector α (n + 1))
(hp : ∀ x ∈ v.toList, p x) :
(v.pmap f hp).head = f v.head (hp _ <| by
rw [← cons_head_tail v, toList_cons, head_cons, List.mem_cons]; exact .inl rfl) := by
obtain ⟨a, v', h⟩ := Vector.exists_eq_cons v
simp_rw [h, pmap_cons, head_cons]
@[simp]
theorem tail_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → p a → β) (v : Vector α (n + 1))
(hp : ∀ x ∈ v.toList, p x) :
(v.pmap f hp).tail = v.tail.pmap f (fun x hx ↦ hp _ <| by
rw [← cons_head_tail v, toList_cons, List.mem_cons]; exact .inr hx) := by
obtain ⟨a, v', h⟩ := Vector.exists_eq_cons v
simp_rw [h, pmap_cons, tail_cons]
@[simp]
theorem getElem_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → p a → β) (v : Vector α n)
(hp : ∀ x ∈ v.toList, p x) {i : ℕ} (hi : i < n) :
(v.pmap f hp)[i] = f v[i] (hp _ (by simp [getElem_def, List.getElem_mem])) := by
simp only [getElem_def, toList_pmap, List.getElem_pmap]
theorem get_eq_get_toList (v : Vector α n) (i : Fin n) :
v.get i = v.toList.get (Fin.cast v.toList_length.symm i) :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-20")]
alias get_eq_get := get_eq_get_toList
@[simp]
theorem get_replicate (a : α) (i : Fin n) : (Vector.replicate n a).get i = a := by
apply List.getElem_replicate
@[simp]
theorem get_map {β : Type*} (v : Vector α n) (f : α → β) (i : Fin n) :
(v.map f).get i = f (v.get i) := by
cases v; simp [Vector.map, get_eq_get_toList]
@[simp]
theorem map₂_nil (f : α → β → γ) : Vector.map₂ f nil nil = nil :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map₂_cons (hd₁ : α) (tl₁ : Vector α n) (hd₂ : β) (tl₂ : Vector β n) (f : α → β → γ) :
Vector.map₂ f (hd₁ ::ᵥ tl₁) (hd₂ ::ᵥ tl₂) = f hd₁ hd₂ ::ᵥ (Vector.map₂ f tl₁ tl₂) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_ofFn {n} (f : Fin n → α) (i) : get (ofFn f) i = f i := by
conv_rhs => erw [← List.get_ofFn f ⟨i, by simp⟩]
simp only [get_eq_get_toList]
congr <;> simp [Fin.heq_ext_iff]
@[simp]
theorem ofFn_get (v : Vector α n) : ofFn (get v) = v := by
rcases v with ⟨l, rfl⟩
apply toList_injective
dsimp
simpa only [toList_ofFn] using List.ofFn_get _
/-- The natural equivalence between length-`n` vectors and functions from `Fin n`. -/
def _root_.Equiv.vectorEquivFin (α : Type*) (n : ℕ) : Vector α n ≃ (Fin n → α) :=
⟨Vector.get, Vector.ofFn, Vector.ofFn_get, fun f => funext <| Vector.get_ofFn f⟩
theorem get_tail (x : Vector α n) (i) : x.tail.get i = x.get ⟨i.1 + 1, by omega⟩ := by
obtain ⟨i, ih⟩ := i; dsimp
rcases x with ⟨_ | _, h⟩ <;> try rfl
rw [List.length] at h
rw [← h] at ih
contradiction
@[simp]
theorem get_tail_succ : ∀ (v : Vector α n.succ) (i : Fin n), get (tail v) i = get v i.succ
| ⟨a :: l, e⟩, ⟨i, h⟩ => by simp [get_eq_get_toList]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_val : ∀ v : Vector α n.succ, v.tail.val = v.val.tail
| ⟨_ :: _, _⟩ => rfl
/-- The `tail` of a `nil` vector is `nil`. -/
@[simp]
theorem tail_nil : (@nil α).tail = nil :=
rfl
/-- The `tail` of a vector made up of one element is `nil`. -/
@[simp]
theorem singleton_tail : ∀ (v : Vector α 1), v.tail = Vector.nil
| ⟨[_], _⟩ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_ofFn {n : ℕ} (f : Fin n.succ → α) : tail (ofFn f) = ofFn fun i => f i.succ :=
(ofFn_get _).symm.trans <| by
congr
funext i
rw [get_tail, get_ofFn]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toList_empty (v : Vector α 0) : v.toList = [] :=
List.length_eq_zero_iff.mp v.2
/-- The list that makes up a `Vector` made up of a single element,
retrieved via `toList`, is equal to the list of that single element. -/
@[simp]
theorem toList_singleton (v : Vector α 1) : v.toList = [v.head] := by
rw [← v.cons_head_tail]
simp only [toList_cons, toList_nil, head_cons, eq_self_iff_true, and_self_iff, singleton_tail]
@[simp]
theorem empty_toList_eq_ff (v : Vector α (n + 1)) : v.toList.isEmpty = false :=
match v with
| ⟨_ :: _, _⟩ => rfl
theorem not_empty_toList (v : Vector α (n + 1)) : ¬v.toList.isEmpty := by
simp only [empty_toList_eq_ff, Bool.coe_sort_false, not_false_iff]
/-- Mapping under `id` does not change a vector. -/
@[simp]
theorem map_id {n : ℕ} (v : Vector α n) : Vector.map id v = v :=
Vector.eq _ _ (by simp only [List.map_id, Vector.toList_map])
theorem nodup_iff_injective_get {v : Vector α n} : v.toList.Nodup ↔ Function.Injective v.get := by
obtain ⟨l, hl⟩ := v
subst hl
exact List.nodup_iff_injective_get
theorem head?_toList : ∀ v : Vector α n.succ, (toList v).head? = some (head v)
| ⟨_ :: _, _⟩ => rfl
/-- Reverse a vector. -/
def reverse (v : Vector α n) : Vector α n :=
⟨v.toList.reverse, by simp⟩
/-- The `List` of a vector after a `reverse`, retrieved by `toList` is equal
to the `List.reverse` after retrieving a vector's `toList`. -/
theorem toList_reverse {v : Vector α n} : v.reverse.toList = v.toList.reverse :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_reverse {v : Vector α n} : v.reverse.reverse = v := by
cases v
simp [Vector.reverse]
@[simp]
theorem get_zero : ∀ v : Vector α n.succ, get v 0 = head v
| ⟨_ :: _, _⟩ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_ofFn {n : ℕ} (f : Fin n.succ → α) : head (ofFn f) = f 0 := by
rw [← get_zero, get_ofFn]
theorem get_cons_zero (a : α) (v : Vector α n) : get (a ::ᵥ v) 0 = a := by simp [get_zero]
/-- Accessing the nth element of a vector made up
of one element `x : α` is `x` itself. -/
@[simp]
theorem get_cons_nil : ∀ {ix : Fin 1} (x : α), get (x ::ᵥ nil) ix = x
| ⟨0, _⟩, _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_cons_succ (a : α) (v : Vector α n) (i : Fin n) : get (a ::ᵥ v) i.succ = get v i := by
rw [← get_tail_succ, tail_cons]
/-- The last element of a `Vector`, given that the vector is at least one element. -/
def last (v : Vector α (n + 1)) : α :=
v.get (Fin.last n)
/-- The last element of a `Vector`, given that the vector is at least one element. -/
theorem last_def {v : Vector α (n + 1)} : v.last = v.get (Fin.last n) :=
rfl
/-- The `last` element of a vector is the `head` of the `reverse` vector. -/
theorem reverse_get_zero {v : Vector α (n + 1)} : v.reverse.head = v.last := by
rw [← get_zero, last_def, get_eq_get_toList, get_eq_get_toList]
simp_rw [toList_reverse]
rw [List.get_eq_getElem, List.get_eq_getElem, ← Option.some_inj, Fin.cast, Fin.cast,
← List.getElem?_eq_getElem, ← List.getElem?_eq_getElem, List.getElem?_reverse]
· congr
simp
· simp
section Scan
variable {β : Type*}
variable (f : β → α → β) (b : β)
variable (v : Vector α n)
/-- Construct a `Vector β (n + 1)` from a `Vector α n` by scanning `f : β → α → β`
from the "left", that is, from 0 to `Fin.last n`, using `b : β` as the starting value.
-/
def scanl : Vector β (n + 1) :=
⟨List.scanl f b v.toList, by rw [List.length_scanl, toList_length]⟩
/-- Providing an empty vector to `scanl` gives the starting value `b : β`. -/
@[simp]
theorem scanl_nil : scanl f b nil = b ::ᵥ nil :=
rfl
/-- The recursive step of `scanl` splits a vector `x ::ᵥ v : Vector α (n + 1)`
into the provided starting value `b : β` and the recursed `scanl`
`f b x : β` as the starting value.
This lemma is the `cons` version of `scanl_get`.
-/
@[simp]
theorem scanl_cons (x : α) : scanl f b (x ::ᵥ v) = b ::ᵥ scanl f (f b x) v := by
simp only [scanl, toList_cons, List.scanl]; dsimp
simp only [cons]
/-- The underlying `List` of a `Vector` after a `scanl` is the `List.scanl`
of the underlying `List` of the original `Vector`.
-/
@[simp]
theorem scanl_val : ∀ {v : Vector α n}, (scanl f b v).val = List.scanl f b v.val
| _ => rfl
/-- The `toList` of a `Vector` after a `scanl` is the `List.scanl`
of the `toList` of the original `Vector`.
-/
@[simp]
theorem toList_scanl : (scanl f b v).toList = List.scanl f b v.toList :=
rfl
/-- The recursive step of `scanl` splits a vector made up of a single element
`x ::ᵥ nil : Vector α 1` into a `Vector` of the provided starting value `b : β`
and the mapped `f b x : β` as the last value.
-/
@[simp]
theorem scanl_singleton (v : Vector α 1) : scanl f b v = b ::ᵥ f b v.head ::ᵥ nil := by
rw [← cons_head_tail v]
simp only [scanl_cons, scanl_nil, head_cons, singleton_tail]
/-- The first element of `scanl` of a vector `v : Vector α n`,
retrieved via `head`, is the starting value `b : β`.
-/
@[simp]
theorem scanl_head : (scanl f b v).head = b := by
cases n
· have : v = nil := by simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
simp only [this, scanl_nil, head_cons]
· rw [← cons_head_tail v]
simp [← get_zero, get_eq_get_toList]
/-- For an index `i : Fin n`, the nth element of `scanl` of a
vector `v : Vector α n` at `i.succ`, is equal to the application
function `f : β → α → β` of the `castSucc i` element of
`scanl f b v` and `get v i`.
This lemma is the `get` version of `scanl_cons`.
-/
@[simp]
theorem scanl_get (i : Fin n) :
(scanl f b v).get i.succ = f ((scanl f b v).get (Fin.castSucc i)) (v.get i) := by
rcases n with - | n
· exact i.elim0
induction' n with n hn generalizing b
· have i0 : i = 0 := Fin.eq_zero _
simp [scanl_singleton, i0, get_zero]; simp [get_eq_get_toList, List.get]
· rw [← cons_head_tail v, scanl_cons, get_cons_succ]
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_ i
· simp only [get_zero, scanl_head, Fin.castSucc_zero, head_cons]
· intro i'
simp only [hn, Fin.castSucc_fin_succ, get_cons_succ]
end Scan
/-- Monadic analog of `Vector.ofFn`.
Given a monadic function on `Fin n`, return a `Vector α n` inside the monad. -/
def mOfFn {m} [Monad m] {α : Type u} : ∀ {n}, (Fin n → m α) → m (Vector α n)
| 0, _ => pure nil
| _ + 1, f => do
let a ← f 0
let v ← mOfFn fun i => f i.succ
pure (a ::ᵥ v)
theorem mOfFn_pure {m} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] {α} :
∀ {n} (f : Fin n → α), (@mOfFn m _ _ _ fun i => pure (f i)) = pure (ofFn f)
| 0, _ => rfl
| n + 1, f => by
rw [mOfFn, @mOfFn_pure m _ _ _ n _, ofFn]
simp
/-- Apply a monadic function to each component of a vector,
returning a vector inside the monad. -/
def mmap {m} [Monad m] {α} {β : Type u} (f : α → m β) : ∀ {n}, Vector α n → m (Vector β n)
| 0, _ => pure nil
| _ + 1, xs => do
let h' ← f xs.head
let t' ← mmap f xs.tail
pure (h' ::ᵥ t')
@[simp]
theorem mmap_nil {m} [Monad m] {α β} (f : α → m β) : mmap f nil = pure nil :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mmap_cons {m} [Monad m] {α β} (f : α → m β) (a) :
∀ {n} (v : Vector α n),
mmap f (a ::ᵥ v) = do
let h' ← f a
let t' ← mmap f v
pure (h' ::ᵥ t')
| _, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => rfl
/--
Define `C v` by induction on `v : Vector α n`.
This function has two arguments: `nil` handles the base case on `C nil`,
and `cons` defines the inductive step using `∀ x : α, C w → C (x ::ᵥ w)`.
It is used as the default induction principle for the `induction` tactic.
-/
@[elab_as_elim, induction_eliminator]
def inductionOn {C : ∀ {n : ℕ}, Vector α n → Sort*} {n : ℕ} (v : Vector α n)
(nil : C nil) (cons : ∀ {n : ℕ} {x : α} {w : Vector α n}, C w → C (x ::ᵥ w)) : C v := by
induction' n with n ih
· rcases v with ⟨_ | ⟨-, -⟩, - | -⟩
exact nil
· rcases v with ⟨_ | ⟨a, v⟩, v_property⟩
cases v_property
exact cons (ih ⟨v, (add_left_inj 1).mp v_property⟩)
@[simp]
theorem inductionOn_nil {C : ∀ {n : ℕ}, Vector α n → Sort*}
(nil : C nil) (cons : ∀ {n : ℕ} {x : α} {w : Vector α n}, C w → C (x ::ᵥ w)) :
Vector.nil.inductionOn nil cons = nil :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem inductionOn_cons {C : ∀ {n : ℕ}, Vector α n → Sort*} {n : ℕ} (x : α) (v : Vector α n)
(nil : C nil) (cons : ∀ {n : ℕ} {x : α} {w : Vector α n}, C w → C (x ::ᵥ w)) :
(x ::ᵥ v).inductionOn nil cons = cons (v.inductionOn nil cons : C v) :=
rfl
variable {β γ : Type*}
/-- Define `C v w` by induction on a pair of vectors `v : Vector α n` and `w : Vector β n`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def inductionOn₂ {C : ∀ {n}, Vector α n → Vector β n → Sort*}
(v : Vector α n) (w : Vector β n)
(nil : C nil nil) (cons : ∀ {n a b} {x : Vector α n} {y}, C x y → C (a ::ᵥ x) (b ::ᵥ y)) :
C v w := by
induction' n with n ih
· rcases v with ⟨_ | ⟨-, -⟩, - | -⟩
rcases w with ⟨_ | ⟨-, -⟩, - | -⟩
exact nil
· rcases v with ⟨_ | ⟨a, v⟩, v_property⟩
cases v_property
rcases w with ⟨_ | ⟨b, w⟩, w_property⟩
cases w_property
apply @cons n _ _ ⟨v, (add_left_inj 1).mp v_property⟩ ⟨w, (add_left_inj 1).mp w_property⟩
apply ih
/-- Define `C u v w` by induction on a triplet of vectors
`u : Vector α n`, `v : Vector β n`, and `w : Vector γ b`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def inductionOn₃ {C : ∀ {n}, Vector α n → Vector β n → Vector γ n → Sort*}
(u : Vector α n) (v : Vector β n) (w : Vector γ n) (nil : C nil nil nil)
(cons : ∀ {n a b c} {x : Vector α n} {y z}, C x y z → C (a ::ᵥ x) (b ::ᵥ y) (c ::ᵥ z)) :
C u v w := by
induction' n with n ih
· rcases u with ⟨_ | ⟨-, -⟩, - | -⟩
rcases v with ⟨_ | ⟨-, -⟩, - | -⟩
rcases w with ⟨_ | ⟨-, -⟩, - | -⟩
exact nil
· rcases u with ⟨_ | ⟨a, u⟩, u_property⟩
cases u_property
rcases v with ⟨_ | ⟨b, v⟩, v_property⟩
cases v_property
rcases w with ⟨_ | ⟨c, w⟩, w_property⟩
cases w_property
apply
@cons n _ _ _ ⟨u, (add_left_inj 1).mp u_property⟩ ⟨v, (add_left_inj 1).mp v_property⟩
⟨w, (add_left_inj 1).mp w_property⟩
apply ih
/-- Define `motive v` by case-analysis on `v : Vector α n`. -/
def casesOn {motive : ∀ {n}, Vector α n → Sort*} (v : Vector α m)
(nil : motive nil)
(cons : ∀ {n}, (hd : α) → (tl : Vector α n) → motive (Vector.cons hd tl)) :
motive v :=
inductionOn (C := motive) v nil @fun _ hd tl _ => cons hd tl
/-- Define `motive v₁ v₂` by case-analysis on `v₁ : Vector α n` and `v₂ : Vector β n`. -/
def casesOn₂ {motive : ∀ {n}, Vector α n → Vector β n → Sort*} (v₁ : Vector α m) (v₂ : Vector β m)
(nil : motive nil nil)
(cons : ∀ {n}, (x : α) → (y : β) → (xs : Vector α n) → (ys : Vector β n)
→ motive (x ::ᵥ xs) (y ::ᵥ ys)) :
motive v₁ v₂ :=
inductionOn₂ (C := motive) v₁ v₂ nil @fun _ x y xs ys _ => cons x y xs ys
/-- Define `motive v₁ v₂ v₃` by case-analysis on `v₁ : Vector α n`, `v₂ : Vector β n`, and
`v₃ : Vector γ n`. -/
def casesOn₃ {motive : ∀ {n}, Vector α n → Vector β n → Vector γ n → Sort*} (v₁ : Vector α m)
(v₂ : Vector β m) (v₃ : Vector γ m) (nil : motive nil nil nil)
(cons : ∀ {n}, (x : α) → (y : β) → (z : γ) → (xs : Vector α n) → (ys : Vector β n)
→ (zs : Vector γ n) → motive (x ::ᵥ xs) (y ::ᵥ ys) (z ::ᵥ zs)) :
motive v₁ v₂ v₃ :=
inductionOn₃ (C := motive) v₁ v₂ v₃ nil @fun _ x y z xs ys zs _ => cons x y z xs ys zs
/-- Cast a vector to an array. -/
def toArray : Vector α n → Array α
| ⟨xs, _⟩ => cast (by rfl) xs.toArray
section InsertIdx
variable {a : α}
/-- `v.insertIdx a i` inserts `a` into the vector `v` at position `i`
(and shifting later components to the right). -/
def insertIdx (a : α) (i : Fin (n + 1)) (v : Vector α n) : Vector α (n + 1) :=
⟨v.1.insertIdx i a, by
rw [List.length_insertIdx, v.2]
split <;> omega⟩
theorem insertIdx_val {i : Fin (n + 1)} {v : Vector α n} :
(v.insertIdx a i).val = v.val.insertIdx i.1 a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem eraseIdx_val {i : Fin n} : ∀ {v : Vector α n}, (eraseIdx i v).val = v.val.eraseIdx i
| _ => rfl
theorem eraseIdx_insertIdx {v : Vector α n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} :
eraseIdx i (insertIdx a i v) = v :=
Subtype.eq (List.eraseIdx_insertIdx ..)
/-- Erasing an element after inserting an element, at different indices. -/
theorem eraseIdx_insertIdx' {v : Vector α (n + 1)} :
∀ {i : Fin (n + 1)} {j : Fin (n + 2)},
eraseIdx (j.succAbove i) (insertIdx a j v) = insertIdx a (i.predAbove j) (eraseIdx i v)
| ⟨i, hi⟩, ⟨j, hj⟩ => by
dsimp [insertIdx, eraseIdx, Fin.succAbove, Fin.predAbove]
rw [Subtype.mk_eq_mk]
simp only [Fin.lt_iff_val_lt_val]
split_ifs with hij
· rcases Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero
(Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 (lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.zero_le _) hij)) with ⟨j, rfl⟩
rw [← List.insertIdx_eraseIdx_of_ge]
· simp; rfl
· simpa
· simpa [Nat.lt_succ_iff] using hij
· dsimp
rw [← List.insertIdx_eraseIdx_of_le]
· rfl
· simpa
· simpa [not_lt] using hij
theorem insertIdx_comm (a b : α) (i j : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≤ j) :
∀ v : Vector α n,
(v.insertIdx a i).insertIdx b j.succ = (v.insertIdx b j).insertIdx a (Fin.castSucc i)
| ⟨l, hl⟩ => by
refine Subtype.eq ?_
simp only [insertIdx_val, Fin.val_succ, Fin.castSucc, Fin.coe_castAdd]
apply List.insertIdx_comm
· assumption
· rw [hl]
exact Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ j.2
end InsertIdx
section Set
/-- `set v n a` replaces the `n`th element of `v` with `a`. -/
def set (v : Vector α n) (i : Fin n) (a : α) : Vector α n :=
⟨v.1.set i.1 a, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem toList_set (v : Vector α n) (i : Fin n) (a : α) :
(v.set i a).toList = v.toList.set i a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_set_same (v : Vector α n) (i : Fin n) (a : α) : (v.set i a).get i = a := by
cases v; cases i; simp [Vector.set, get_eq_get_toList]
theorem get_set_of_ne {v : Vector α n} {i j : Fin n} (h : i ≠ j) (a : α) :
(v.set i a).get j = v.get j := by
cases v; cases i; cases j
simp only [get_eq_get_toList, toList_set, toList_mk, Fin.cast_mk, List.get_eq_getElem]
rw [List.getElem_set_of_ne]
· simpa using h
theorem get_set_eq_if {v : Vector α n} {i j : Fin n} (a : α) :
(v.set i a).get j = if i = j then a else v.get j := by
split_ifs <;> (try simp [*]); rwa [get_set_of_ne]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_set [Monoid α] (v : Vector α n) (i : Fin n) (a : α) :
(v.set i a).toList.prod = (v.take i).toList.prod * a * (v.drop (i + 1)).toList.prod := by
refine (List.prod_set v.toList i a).trans ?_
simp_all
/-- Variant of `List.Vector.prod_set` that multiplies by the inverse of the replaced element -/
@[to_additive
"Variant of `List.Vector.sum_set` that subtracts the inverse of the replaced element"]
theorem prod_set' [CommGroup α] (v : Vector α n) (i : Fin n) (a : α) :
(v.set i a).toList.prod = v.toList.prod * (v.get i)⁻¹ * a := by
refine (List.prod_set' v.toList i a).trans ?_
simp [get_eq_get_toList, mul_assoc]
end Set
end Vector
namespace Vector
section Traverse
variable {F G : Type u → Type u}
variable [Applicative F] [Applicative G]
open Applicative Functor
open List (cons)
open Nat
private def traverseAux {α β : Type u} (f : α → F β) : ∀ x : List α, F (Vector β x.length)
| [] => pure Vector.nil
| x :: xs => Vector.cons <$> f x <*> traverseAux f xs
/-- Apply an applicative function to each component of a vector. -/
protected def traverse {α β : Type u} (f : α → F β) : Vector α n → F (Vector β n)
| ⟨v, Hv⟩ => cast (by rw [Hv]) <| traverseAux f v
section
variable {α β : Type u}
@[simp]
protected theorem traverse_def (f : α → F β) (x : α) :
∀ xs : Vector α n, (x ::ᵥ xs).traverse f = cons <$> f x <*> xs.traverse f := by
rintro ⟨xs, rfl⟩; rfl
protected theorem id_traverse : ∀ x : Vector α n, x.traverse (pure : _ → Id _) = x := by
rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩; dsimp [Vector.traverse, cast]
induction' x with x xs IH; · rfl
simp! [IH]; rfl
end
open Function
| variable [LawfulApplicative G]
variable {α β γ : Type u}
-- We need to turn off the linter here as
| Mathlib/Data/Vector/Basic.lean | 658 | 661 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.SmallSets
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousOn
/-!
# Basic results on uniform spaces
Uniform spaces are a generalization of metric spaces and topological groups.
## Main definitions
In this file we define a complete lattice structure on the type `UniformSpace X`
of uniform structures on `X`, as well as the pullback (`UniformSpace.comap`) of uniform structures
coming from the pullback of filters.
Like distance functions, uniform structures cannot be pushed forward in general.
## Notations
Localized in `Uniformity`, we have the notation `𝓤 X` for the uniformity on a uniform space `X`,
and `○` for composition of relations, seen as terms with type `Set (X × X)`.
## References
The formalization uses the books:
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
* [I. M. James, *Topologies and Uniformities*][james1999]
But it makes a more systematic use of the filter library.
-/
open Set Filter Topology
universe u v ua ub uc ud
/-!
### Relations, seen as `Set (α × α)`
-/
variable {α : Type ua} {β : Type ub} {γ : Type uc} {δ : Type ud} {ι : Sort*}
open Uniformity
section UniformSpace
variable [UniformSpace α]
/-- If `s ∈ 𝓤 α`, then for any natural `n`, for a subset `t` of a sufficiently small set in `𝓤 α`,
we have `t ○ t ○ ... ○ t ⊆ s` (`n` compositions). -/
theorem eventually_uniformity_iterate_comp_subset {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) (n : ℕ) :
∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, (t ○ ·)^[n] t ⊆ s := by
suffices ∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, t ⊆ s ∧ (t ○ ·)^[n] t ⊆ s from (eventually_and.1 this).2
induction n generalizing s with
| zero => simpa
| succ _ ihn =>
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs with ⟨t, htU, hts⟩
refine (ihn htU).mono fun U hU => ?_
rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply']
exact
⟨hU.1.trans <| (subset_comp_self <| refl_le_uniformity htU).trans hts,
(compRel_mono hU.1 hU.2).trans hts⟩
/-- If `s ∈ 𝓤 α`, then for a subset `t` of a sufficiently small set in `𝓤 α`,
we have `t ○ t ⊆ s`. -/
theorem eventually_uniformity_comp_subset {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, t ○ t ⊆ s :=
eventually_uniformity_iterate_comp_subset hs 1
/-!
### Balls in uniform spaces
-/
namespace UniformSpace
open UniformSpace (ball)
lemma isOpen_ball (x : α) {V : Set (α × α)} (hV : IsOpen V) : IsOpen (ball x V) :=
hV.preimage <| .prodMk_right _
lemma isClosed_ball (x : α) {V : Set (α × α)} (hV : IsClosed V) : IsClosed (ball x V) :=
hV.preimage <| .prodMk_right _
/-!
### Neighborhoods in uniform spaces
-/
theorem hasBasis_nhds_prod (x y : α) :
HasBasis (𝓝 (x, y)) (fun s => s ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsSymmetricRel s) fun s => ball x s ×ˢ ball y s := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
apply (hasBasis_nhds x).prod_same_index (hasBasis_nhds y)
rintro U V ⟨U_in, U_symm⟩ ⟨V_in, V_symm⟩
exact
⟨U ∩ V, ⟨(𝓤 α).inter_sets U_in V_in, U_symm.inter V_symm⟩, ball_inter_left x U V,
ball_inter_right y U V⟩
end UniformSpace
open UniformSpace
theorem nhds_eq_uniformity_prod {a b : α} :
𝓝 (a, b) =
(𝓤 α).lift' fun s : Set (α × α) => { y : α | (y, a) ∈ s } ×ˢ { y : α | (b, y) ∈ s } := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq, nhds_nhds_eq_uniformity_uniformity_prod, lift_lift'_same_eq_lift']
· exact fun s => monotone_const.set_prod monotone_preimage
· refine fun t => Monotone.set_prod ?_ monotone_const
exact monotone_preimage (f := fun y => (y, a))
theorem nhdset_of_mem_uniformity {d : Set (α × α)} (s : Set (α × α)) (hd : d ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t : Set (α × α), IsOpen t ∧ s ⊆ t ∧
t ⊆ { p | ∃ x y, (p.1, x) ∈ d ∧ (x, y) ∈ s ∧ (y, p.2) ∈ d } := by
let cl_d := { p : α × α | ∃ x y, (p.1, x) ∈ d ∧ (x, y) ∈ s ∧ (y, p.2) ∈ d }
have : ∀ p ∈ s, ∃ t, t ⊆ cl_d ∧ IsOpen t ∧ p ∈ t := fun ⟨x, y⟩ hp =>
mem_nhds_iff.mp <|
show cl_d ∈ 𝓝 (x, y) by
rw [nhds_eq_uniformity_prod, mem_lift'_sets]
· exact ⟨d, hd, fun ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => ⟨x, y, ha, hp, hb⟩⟩
· exact fun _ _ h _ h' => ⟨h h'.1, h h'.2⟩
choose t ht using this
exact ⟨(⋃ p : α × α, ⋃ h : p ∈ s, t p h : Set (α × α)),
isOpen_iUnion fun p : α × α => isOpen_iUnion fun hp => (ht p hp).right.left,
fun ⟨a, b⟩ hp => by
simp only [mem_iUnion, Prod.exists]; exact ⟨a, b, hp, (ht (a, b) hp).right.right⟩,
iUnion_subset fun p => iUnion_subset fun hp => (ht p hp).left⟩
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem nhds_le_uniformity (x : α) : 𝓝 (x, x) ≤ 𝓤 α := by
intro V V_in
rcases comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets V_in with ⟨w, w_in, w_symm, w_sub⟩
have : ball x w ×ˢ ball x w ∈ 𝓝 (x, x) := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
exact prod_mem_prod (ball_mem_nhds x w_in) (ball_mem_nhds x w_in)
apply mem_of_superset this
rintro ⟨u, v⟩ ⟨u_in, v_in⟩
exact w_sub (mem_comp_of_mem_ball w_symm u_in v_in)
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem iSup_nhds_le_uniformity : ⨆ x : α, 𝓝 (x, x) ≤ 𝓤 α :=
iSup_le nhds_le_uniformity
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem nhdsSet_diagonal_le_uniformity : 𝓝ˢ (diagonal α) ≤ 𝓤 α :=
(nhdsSet_diagonal α).trans_le iSup_nhds_le_uniformity
section
variable (α)
theorem UniformSpace.has_seq_basis [IsCountablyGenerated <| 𝓤 α] :
∃ V : ℕ → Set (α × α), HasAntitoneBasis (𝓤 α) V ∧ ∀ n, IsSymmetricRel (V n) :=
let ⟨U, hsym, hbasis⟩ := (@UniformSpace.hasBasis_symmetric α _).exists_antitone_subbasis
⟨U, hbasis, fun n => (hsym n).2⟩
end
/-!
### Closure and interior in uniform spaces
-/
theorem closure_eq_uniformity (s : Set <| α × α) :
closure s = ⋂ V ∈ { V | V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsSymmetricRel V }, V ○ s ○ V := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp +contextual only
[mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis (UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds_prod x y), mem_iInter, mem_setOf_eq,
and_imp, mem_comp_comp, exists_prop, ← mem_inter_iff, inter_comm, Set.Nonempty]
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_closed :
HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsClosed V) id := by
refine Filter.hasBasis_self.2 fun t h => ?_
rcases comp_comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets h with ⟨w, w_in, w_symm, r⟩
refine ⟨closure w, mem_of_superset w_in subset_closure, isClosed_closure, ?_⟩
refine Subset.trans ?_ r
rw [closure_eq_uniformity]
apply iInter_subset_of_subset
apply iInter_subset
exact ⟨w_in, w_symm⟩
theorem uniformity_eq_uniformity_closure : 𝓤 α = (𝓤 α).lift' closure :=
Eq.symm <| uniformity_hasBasis_closed.lift'_closure_eq_self fun _ => And.right
theorem Filter.HasBasis.uniformity_closure {p : ι → Prop} {U : ι → Set (α × α)}
(h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p U) : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun i => closure (U i) :=
(@uniformity_eq_uniformity_closure α _).symm ▸ h.lift'_closure
/-- Closed entourages form a basis of the uniformity filter. -/
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_closure : HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α) closure :=
(𝓤 α).basis_sets.uniformity_closure
theorem closure_eq_inter_uniformity {t : Set (α × α)} : closure t = ⋂ d ∈ 𝓤 α, d ○ (t ○ d) :=
calc
closure t = ⋂ (V) (_ : V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsSymmetricRel V), V ○ t ○ V := closure_eq_uniformity t
_ = ⋂ V ∈ 𝓤 α, V ○ t ○ V :=
Eq.symm <|
UniformSpace.hasBasis_symmetric.biInter_mem fun _ _ hV =>
compRel_mono (compRel_mono hV Subset.rfl) hV
_ = ⋂ V ∈ 𝓤 α, V ○ (t ○ V) := by simp only [compRel_assoc]
theorem uniformity_eq_uniformity_interior : 𝓤 α = (𝓤 α).lift' interior :=
le_antisymm
(le_iInf₂ fun d hd => by
let ⟨s, hs, hs_comp⟩ := comp3_mem_uniformity hd
let ⟨t, ht, hst, ht_comp⟩ := nhdset_of_mem_uniformity s hs
have : s ⊆ interior d :=
calc
s ⊆ t := hst
_ ⊆ interior d :=
ht.subset_interior_iff.mpr fun x (hx : x ∈ t) =>
let ⟨x, y, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := ht_comp hx
hs_comp ⟨x, h₁, y, h₂, h₃⟩
have : interior d ∈ 𝓤 α := by filter_upwards [hs] using this
simp [this])
fun _ hs => ((𝓤 α).lift' interior).sets_of_superset (mem_lift' hs) interior_subset
theorem interior_mem_uniformity {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : interior s ∈ 𝓤 α := by
rw [uniformity_eq_uniformity_interior]; exact mem_lift' hs
theorem mem_uniformity_isClosed {s : Set (α × α)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : ∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, IsClosed t ∧ t ⊆ s :=
let ⟨t, ⟨ht_mem, htc⟩, hts⟩ := uniformity_hasBasis_closed.mem_iff.1 h
⟨t, ht_mem, htc, hts⟩
theorem isOpen_iff_isOpen_ball_subset {s : Set α} :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ V ∈ 𝓤 α, IsOpen V ∧ ball x V ⊆ s := by
rw [isOpen_iff_ball_subset]
constructor <;> intro h x hx
· obtain ⟨V, hV, hV'⟩ := h x hx
exact
⟨interior V, interior_mem_uniformity hV, isOpen_interior,
(ball_mono interior_subset x).trans hV'⟩
· obtain ⟨V, hV, -, hV'⟩ := h x hx
exact ⟨V, hV, hV'⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-18")] alias
isOpen_iff_open_ball_subset := isOpen_iff_isOpen_ball_subset
/-- The uniform neighborhoods of all points of a dense set cover the whole space. -/
theorem Dense.biUnion_uniformity_ball {s : Set α} {U : Set (α × α)} (hs : Dense s) (hU : U ∈ 𝓤 α) :
⋃ x ∈ s, ball x U = univ := by
refine iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => ?_
rcases hs.inter_nhds_nonempty (mem_nhds_right y hU) with ⟨x, hxs, hxy : (x, y) ∈ U⟩
exact ⟨x, hxs, hxy⟩
/-- The uniform neighborhoods of all points of a dense indexed collection cover the whole space. -/
lemma DenseRange.iUnion_uniformity_ball {ι : Type*} {xs : ι → α}
(xs_dense : DenseRange xs) {U : Set (α × α)} (hU : U ∈ uniformity α) :
⋃ i, UniformSpace.ball (xs i) U = univ := by
rw [← biUnion_range (f := xs) (g := fun x ↦ UniformSpace.ball x U)]
exact Dense.biUnion_uniformity_ball xs_dense hU
/-!
### Uniformity bases
-/
/-- Open elements of `𝓤 α` form a basis of `𝓤 α`. -/
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_open : HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsOpen V) id :=
hasBasis_self.2 fun s hs =>
⟨interior s, interior_mem_uniformity hs, isOpen_interior, interior_subset⟩
theorem Filter.HasBasis.mem_uniformity_iff {p : β → Prop} {s : β → Set (α × α)}
(h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) {t : Set (α × α)} :
t ∈ 𝓤 α ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ ∀ a b, (a, b) ∈ s i → (a, b) ∈ t :=
h.mem_iff.trans <| by simp only [Prod.forall, subset_def]
/-- Open elements `s : Set (α × α)` of `𝓤 α` such that `(x, y) ∈ s ↔ (y, x) ∈ s` form a basis
of `𝓤 α`. -/
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_open_symmetric :
HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsOpen V ∧ IsSymmetricRel V) id := by
simp only [← and_assoc]
refine uniformity_hasBasis_open.restrict fun s hs => ⟨symmetrizeRel s, ?_⟩
exact
⟨⟨symmetrize_mem_uniformity hs.1, IsOpen.inter hs.2 (hs.2.preimage continuous_swap)⟩,
symmetric_symmetrizeRel s, symmetrizeRel_subset_self s⟩
theorem comp_open_symm_mem_uniformity_sets {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, IsOpen t ∧ IsSymmetricRel t ∧ t ○ t ⊆ s := by
obtain ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs
obtain ⟨u, ⟨hu₁, hu₂, hu₃⟩, hu₄ : u ⊆ t⟩ := uniformity_hasBasis_open_symmetric.mem_iff.mp ht₁
exact ⟨u, hu₁, hu₂, hu₃, (compRel_mono hu₄ hu₄).trans ht₂⟩
end UniformSpace
open uniformity
section Constructions
instance : PartialOrder (UniformSpace α) :=
PartialOrder.lift (fun u => 𝓤[u]) fun _ _ => UniformSpace.ext
protected theorem UniformSpace.le_def {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} : u₁ ≤ u₂ ↔ 𝓤[u₁] ≤ 𝓤[u₂] := Iff.rfl
instance : InfSet (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨fun s =>
UniformSpace.ofCore
{ uniformity := ⨅ u ∈ s, 𝓤[u]
refl := le_iInf fun u => le_iInf fun _ => u.toCore.refl
symm := le_iInf₂ fun u hu =>
le_trans (map_mono <| iInf_le_of_le _ <| iInf_le _ hu) u.symm
comp := le_iInf₂ fun u hu =>
le_trans (lift'_mono (iInf_le_of_le _ <| iInf_le _ hu) <| le_rfl) u.comp }⟩
protected theorem UniformSpace.sInf_le {tt : Set (UniformSpace α)} {t : UniformSpace α}
(h : t ∈ tt) : sInf tt ≤ t :=
show ⨅ u ∈ tt, 𝓤[u] ≤ 𝓤[t] from iInf₂_le t h
protected theorem UniformSpace.le_sInf {tt : Set (UniformSpace α)} {t : UniformSpace α}
(h : ∀ t' ∈ tt, t ≤ t') : t ≤ sInf tt :=
show 𝓤[t] ≤ ⨅ u ∈ tt, 𝓤[u] from le_iInf₂ h
instance : Top (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨@UniformSpace.mk α ⊤ ⊤ le_top le_top fun x ↦ by simp only [nhds_top, comap_top]⟩
instance : Bot (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨{ toTopologicalSpace := ⊥
uniformity := 𝓟 idRel
symm := by simp [Tendsto]
comp := lift'_le (mem_principal_self _) <| principal_mono.2 id_compRel.subset
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity := fun s => by
let _ : TopologicalSpace α := ⊥; have := discreteTopology_bot α
simp [idRel] }⟩
instance : Min (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨fun u₁ u₂ =>
{ uniformity := 𝓤[u₁] ⊓ 𝓤[u₂]
symm := u₁.symm.inf u₂.symm
comp := (lift'_inf_le _ _ _).trans <| inf_le_inf u₁.comp u₂.comp
toTopologicalSpace := u₁.toTopologicalSpace ⊓ u₂.toTopologicalSpace
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity := fun _ ↦ by
rw [@nhds_inf _ u₁.toTopologicalSpace _, @nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ u₁,
@nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ u₂, comap_inf] }⟩
instance : CompleteLattice (UniformSpace α) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (PartialOrder (UniformSpace α)) with
sup := fun a b => sInf { x | a ≤ x ∧ b ≤ x }
le_sup_left := fun _ _ => UniformSpace.le_sInf fun _ ⟨h, _⟩ => h
le_sup_right := fun _ _ => UniformSpace.le_sInf fun _ ⟨_, h⟩ => h
sup_le := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => UniformSpace.sInf_le ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
le_inf := fun a _ _ h₁ h₂ => show a.uniformity ≤ _ from le_inf h₁ h₂
inf_le_left := fun a _ => show _ ≤ a.uniformity from inf_le_left
inf_le_right := fun _ b => show _ ≤ b.uniformity from inf_le_right
top := ⊤
le_top := fun a => show a.uniformity ≤ ⊤ from le_top
bot := ⊥
bot_le := fun u => u.toCore.refl
sSup := fun tt => sInf { t | ∀ t' ∈ tt, t' ≤ t }
le_sSup := fun _ _ h => UniformSpace.le_sInf fun _ h' => h' _ h
sSup_le := fun _ _ h => UniformSpace.sInf_le h
sInf := sInf
le_sInf := fun _ _ hs => UniformSpace.le_sInf hs
sInf_le := fun _ _ ha => UniformSpace.sInf_le ha }
theorem iInf_uniformity {ι : Sort*} {u : ι → UniformSpace α} : 𝓤[iInf u] = ⨅ i, 𝓤[u i] :=
iInf_range
theorem inf_uniformity {u v : UniformSpace α} : 𝓤[u ⊓ v] = 𝓤[u] ⊓ 𝓤[v] := rfl
lemma bot_uniformity : 𝓤[(⊥ : UniformSpace α)] = 𝓟 idRel := rfl
lemma top_uniformity : 𝓤[(⊤ : UniformSpace α)] = ⊤ := rfl
instance inhabitedUniformSpace : Inhabited (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨⊥⟩
instance inhabitedUniformSpaceCore : Inhabited (UniformSpace.Core α) :=
⟨@UniformSpace.toCore _ default⟩
instance [Subsingleton α] : Unique (UniformSpace α) where
uniq u := bot_unique <| le_principal_iff.2 <| by
rw [idRel, ← diagonal, diagonal_eq_univ]; exact univ_mem
/-- Given `f : α → β` and a uniformity `u` on `β`, the inverse image of `u` under `f`
is the inverse image in the filter sense of the induced function `α × α → β × β`.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev UniformSpace.comap (f : α → β) (u : UniformSpace β) : UniformSpace α where
uniformity := 𝓤[u].comap fun p : α × α => (f p.1, f p.2)
symm := by
simp only [tendsto_comap_iff, Prod.swap, (· ∘ ·)]
exact tendsto_swap_uniformity.comp tendsto_comap
comp := le_trans
(by
rw [comap_lift'_eq, comap_lift'_eq2]
· exact lift'_mono' fun s _ ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨x, h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨f x, h₁, h₂⟩
· exact monotone_id.compRel monotone_id)
(comap_mono u.comp)
toTopologicalSpace := u.toTopologicalSpace.induced f
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity x := by
simp only [nhds_induced, nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, comap_comap, Function.comp_def]
theorem uniformity_comap {_ : UniformSpace β} (f : α → β) :
𝓤[UniformSpace.comap f ‹_›] = comap (Prod.map f f) (𝓤 β) :=
rfl
lemma ball_preimage {f : α → β} {U : Set (β × β)} {x : α} :
UniformSpace.ball x (Prod.map f f ⁻¹' U) = f ⁻¹' UniformSpace.ball (f x) U := by
ext : 1
simp only [UniformSpace.ball, mem_preimage, Prod.map_apply]
@[simp]
theorem uniformSpace_comap_id {α : Type*} : UniformSpace.comap (id : α → α) = id := by
ext : 2
rw [uniformity_comap, Prod.map_id, comap_id]
theorem UniformSpace.comap_comap {α β γ} {uγ : UniformSpace γ} {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} :
UniformSpace.comap (g ∘ f) uγ = UniformSpace.comap f (UniformSpace.comap g uγ) := by
ext1
simp only [uniformity_comap, Filter.comap_comap, Prod.map_comp_map]
theorem UniformSpace.comap_inf {α γ} {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace γ} {f : α → γ} :
(u₁ ⊓ u₂).comap f = u₁.comap f ⊓ u₂.comap f :=
UniformSpace.ext Filter.comap_inf
theorem UniformSpace.comap_iInf {ι α γ} {u : ι → UniformSpace γ} {f : α → γ} :
(⨅ i, u i).comap f = ⨅ i, (u i).comap f := by
ext : 1
simp [uniformity_comap, iInf_uniformity]
theorem UniformSpace.comap_mono {α γ} {f : α → γ} :
Monotone fun u : UniformSpace γ => u.comap f := fun _ _ hu =>
Filter.comap_mono hu
theorem uniformContinuous_iff {α β} {uα : UniformSpace α} {uβ : UniformSpace β} {f : α → β} :
UniformContinuous f ↔ uα ≤ uβ.comap f :=
Filter.map_le_iff_le_comap
theorem le_iff_uniformContinuous_id {u v : UniformSpace α} :
u ≤ v ↔ @UniformContinuous _ _ u v id := by
rw [uniformContinuous_iff, uniformSpace_comap_id, id]
theorem uniformContinuous_comap {f : α → β} [u : UniformSpace β] :
@UniformContinuous α β (UniformSpace.comap f u) u f :=
tendsto_comap
theorem uniformContinuous_comap' {f : γ → β} {g : α → γ} [v : UniformSpace β] [u : UniformSpace α]
(h : UniformContinuous (f ∘ g)) : @UniformContinuous α γ u (UniformSpace.comap f v) g :=
tendsto_comap_iff.2 h
namespace UniformSpace
theorem to_nhds_mono {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} (h : u₁ ≤ u₂) (a : α) :
@nhds _ (@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₁) a ≤
@nhds _ (@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₂) a := by
rw [@nhds_eq_uniformity α u₁ a, @nhds_eq_uniformity α u₂ a]; exact lift'_mono h le_rfl
theorem toTopologicalSpace_mono {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} (h : u₁ ≤ u₂) :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₁ ≤ @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₂ :=
le_of_nhds_le_nhds <| to_nhds_mono h
theorem toTopologicalSpace_comap {f : α → β} {u : UniformSpace β} :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ (UniformSpace.comap f u) =
TopologicalSpace.induced f (@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace β u) :=
rfl
lemma uniformSpace_eq_bot {u : UniformSpace α} : u = ⊥ ↔ idRel ∈ 𝓤[u] :=
le_bot_iff.symm.trans le_principal_iff
protected lemma _root_.Filter.HasBasis.uniformSpace_eq_bot {ι p} {s : ι → Set (α × α)}
{u : UniformSpace α} (h : 𝓤[u].HasBasis p s) :
u = ⊥ ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ Pairwise fun x y : α ↦ (x, y) ∉ s i := by
simp [uniformSpace_eq_bot, h.mem_iff, subset_def, Pairwise, not_imp_not]
theorem toTopologicalSpace_bot : @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace α ⊥ = ⊥ := rfl
theorem toTopologicalSpace_top : @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace α ⊤ = ⊤ := rfl
theorem toTopologicalSpace_iInf {ι : Sort*} {u : ι → UniformSpace α} :
(iInf u).toTopologicalSpace = ⨅ i, (u i).toTopologicalSpace :=
TopologicalSpace.ext_nhds fun a ↦ by simp only [@nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ (iInf u), nhds_iInf,
iInf_uniformity, @nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ (u _), Filter.comap_iInf]
theorem toTopologicalSpace_sInf {s : Set (UniformSpace α)} :
(sInf s).toTopologicalSpace = ⨅ i ∈ s, @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace α i := by
rw [sInf_eq_iInf]
simp only [← toTopologicalSpace_iInf]
theorem toTopologicalSpace_inf {u v : UniformSpace α} :
(u ⊓ v).toTopologicalSpace = u.toTopologicalSpace ⊓ v.toTopologicalSpace :=
rfl
end UniformSpace
theorem UniformContinuous.continuous [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) : Continuous f :=
continuous_iff_le_induced.mpr <| UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace_mono <|
uniformContinuous_iff.1 hf
/-- Uniform space structure on `ULift α`. -/
instance ULift.uniformSpace [UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace (ULift α) :=
UniformSpace.comap ULift.down ‹_›
/-- Uniform space structure on `αᵒᵈ`. -/
instance OrderDual.instUniformSpace [UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace (αᵒᵈ) :=
‹UniformSpace α›
section UniformContinuousInfi
-- TODO: add an `iff` lemma?
theorem UniformContinuous.inf_rng {f : α → β} {u₁ : UniformSpace α} {u₂ u₃ : UniformSpace β}
(h₁ : UniformContinuous[u₁, u₂] f) (h₂ : UniformContinuous[u₁, u₃] f) :
UniformContinuous[u₁, u₂ ⊓ u₃] f :=
tendsto_inf.mpr ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
theorem UniformContinuous.inf_dom_left {f : α → β} {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} {u₃ : UniformSpace β}
(hf : UniformContinuous[u₁, u₃] f) : UniformContinuous[u₁ ⊓ u₂, u₃] f :=
tendsto_inf_left hf
theorem UniformContinuous.inf_dom_right {f : α → β} {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} {u₃ : UniformSpace β}
(hf : UniformContinuous[u₂, u₃] f) : UniformContinuous[u₁ ⊓ u₂, u₃] f :=
tendsto_inf_right hf
theorem uniformContinuous_sInf_dom {f : α → β} {u₁ : Set (UniformSpace α)} {u₂ : UniformSpace β}
{u : UniformSpace α} (h₁ : u ∈ u₁) (hf : UniformContinuous[u, u₂] f) :
UniformContinuous[sInf u₁, u₂] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [sInf_eq_iInf', iInf_uniformity]
exact tendsto_iInf' ⟨u, h₁⟩ hf
theorem uniformContinuous_sInf_rng {f : α → β} {u₁ : UniformSpace α} {u₂ : Set (UniformSpace β)} :
UniformContinuous[u₁, sInf u₂] f ↔ ∀ u ∈ u₂, UniformContinuous[u₁, u] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [sInf_eq_iInf', iInf_uniformity, tendsto_iInf, SetCoe.forall]
theorem uniformContinuous_iInf_dom {f : α → β} {u₁ : ι → UniformSpace α} {u₂ : UniformSpace β}
{i : ι} (hf : UniformContinuous[u₁ i, u₂] f) : UniformContinuous[iInf u₁, u₂] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [iInf_uniformity]
exact tendsto_iInf' i hf
theorem uniformContinuous_iInf_rng {f : α → β} {u₁ : UniformSpace α} {u₂ : ι → UniformSpace β} :
UniformContinuous[u₁, iInf u₂] f ↔ ∀ i, UniformContinuous[u₁, u₂ i] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [iInf_uniformity, tendsto_iInf]
end UniformContinuousInfi
/-- A uniform space with the discrete uniformity has the discrete topology. -/
theorem discreteTopology_of_discrete_uniformity [hα : UniformSpace α] (h : uniformity α = 𝓟 idRel) :
DiscreteTopology α :=
⟨(UniformSpace.ext h.symm : ⊥ = hα) ▸ rfl⟩
instance : UniformSpace Empty := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace PUnit := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace Bool := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace ℕ := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace ℤ := ⊥
section
variable [UniformSpace α]
open Additive Multiplicative
instance : UniformSpace (Additive α) := ‹UniformSpace α›
instance : UniformSpace (Multiplicative α) := ‹UniformSpace α›
theorem uniformContinuous_ofMul : UniformContinuous (ofMul : α → Additive α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformContinuous_toMul : UniformContinuous (toMul : Additive α → α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformContinuous_ofAdd : UniformContinuous (ofAdd : α → Multiplicative α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformContinuous_toAdd : UniformContinuous (toAdd : Multiplicative α → α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformity_additive : 𝓤 (Additive α) = (𝓤 α).map (Prod.map ofMul ofMul) := rfl
theorem uniformity_multiplicative : 𝓤 (Multiplicative α) = (𝓤 α).map (Prod.map ofAdd ofAdd) := rfl
end
instance instUniformSpaceSubtype {p : α → Prop} [t : UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace (Subtype p) :=
UniformSpace.comap Subtype.val t
theorem uniformity_subtype {p : α → Prop} [UniformSpace α] :
𝓤 (Subtype p) = comap (fun q : Subtype p × Subtype p => (q.1.1, q.2.1)) (𝓤 α) :=
rfl
theorem uniformity_setCoe {s : Set α} [UniformSpace α] :
𝓤 s = comap (Prod.map ((↑) : s → α) ((↑) : s → α)) (𝓤 α) :=
rfl
theorem map_uniformity_set_coe {s : Set α} [UniformSpace α] :
map (Prod.map (↑) (↑)) (𝓤 s) = 𝓤 α ⊓ 𝓟 (s ×ˢ s) := by
rw [uniformity_setCoe, map_comap, range_prodMap, Subtype.range_val]
theorem uniformContinuous_subtype_val {p : α → Prop} [UniformSpace α] :
UniformContinuous (Subtype.val : { a : α // p a } → α) :=
uniformContinuous_comap
theorem UniformContinuous.subtype_mk {p : α → Prop} [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : β → α}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) (h : ∀ x, p (f x)) :
UniformContinuous (fun x => ⟨f x, h x⟩ : β → Subtype p) :=
uniformContinuous_comap' hf
theorem uniformContinuousOn_iff_restrict [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
UniformContinuousOn f s ↔ UniformContinuous (s.restrict f) := by
delta UniformContinuousOn UniformContinuous
rw [← map_uniformity_set_coe, tendsto_map'_iff]; rfl
theorem tendsto_of_uniformContinuous_subtype [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β}
{s : Set α} {a : α} (hf : UniformContinuous fun x : s => f x.val) (ha : s ∈ 𝓝 a) :
Tendsto f (𝓝 a) (𝓝 (f a)) := by
rw [(@map_nhds_subtype_coe_eq_nhds α _ s a (mem_of_mem_nhds ha) ha).symm]
exact tendsto_map' hf.continuous.continuousAt
theorem UniformContinuousOn.continuousOn [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α}
(h : UniformContinuousOn f s) : ContinuousOn f s := by
rw [uniformContinuousOn_iff_restrict] at h
rw [continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict]
exact h.continuous
@[to_additive]
instance [UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace αᵐᵒᵖ :=
UniformSpace.comap MulOpposite.unop ‹_›
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformity_mulOpposite [UniformSpace α] :
𝓤 αᵐᵒᵖ = comap (fun q : αᵐᵒᵖ × αᵐᵒᵖ => (q.1.unop, q.2.unop)) (𝓤 α) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem comap_uniformity_mulOpposite [UniformSpace α] :
comap (fun p : α × α => (MulOpposite.op p.1, MulOpposite.op p.2)) (𝓤 αᵐᵒᵖ) = 𝓤 α := by
simpa [uniformity_mulOpposite, comap_comap, (· ∘ ·)] using comap_id
namespace MulOpposite
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformContinuous_unop [UniformSpace α] : UniformContinuous (unop : αᵐᵒᵖ → α) :=
uniformContinuous_comap
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformContinuous_op [UniformSpace α] : UniformContinuous (op : α → αᵐᵒᵖ) :=
uniformContinuous_comap' uniformContinuous_id
end MulOpposite
section Prod
open UniformSpace
/- a similar product space is possible on the function space (uniformity of pointwise convergence),
but we want to have the uniformity of uniform convergence on function spaces -/
instance instUniformSpaceProd [u₁ : UniformSpace α] [u₂ : UniformSpace β] : UniformSpace (α × β) :=
u₁.comap Prod.fst ⊓ u₂.comap Prod.snd
-- check the above produces no diamond for `simp` and typeclass search
example [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
(instTopologicalSpaceProd : TopologicalSpace (α × β)) = UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace := by
with_reducible_and_instances rfl
theorem uniformity_prod [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
𝓤 (α × β) =
((𝓤 α).comap fun p : (α × β) × α × β => (p.1.1, p.2.1)) ⊓
(𝓤 β).comap fun p : (α × β) × α × β => (p.1.2, p.2.2) :=
rfl
instance [UniformSpace α] [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 α)]
[UniformSpace β] [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 β)] : IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 (α × β)) := by
rw [uniformity_prod]
infer_instance
theorem uniformity_prod_eq_comap_prod [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
𝓤 (α × β) =
comap (fun p : (α × β) × α × β => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) (𝓤 α ×ˢ 𝓤 β) := by
simp_rw [uniformity_prod, prod_eq_inf, Filter.comap_inf, Filter.comap_comap, Function.comp_def]
theorem uniformity_prod_eq_prod [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
𝓤 (α × β) = map (fun p : (α × α) × β × β => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) (𝓤 α ×ˢ 𝓤 β) := by
rw [map_swap4_eq_comap, uniformity_prod_eq_comap_prod]
theorem mem_uniformity_of_uniformContinuous_invariant [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
{s : Set (β × β)} {f : α → α → β} (hf : UniformContinuous fun p : α × α => f p.1 p.2)
(hs : s ∈ 𝓤 β) : ∃ u ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ a b c, (a, b) ∈ u → (f a c, f b c) ∈ s := by
rw [UniformContinuous, uniformity_prod_eq_prod, tendsto_map'_iff] at hf
rcases mem_prod_iff.1 (mem_map.1 <| hf hs) with ⟨u, hu, v, hv, huvt⟩
exact ⟨u, hu, fun a b c hab => @huvt ((_, _), (_, _)) ⟨hab, refl_mem_uniformity hv⟩⟩
/-- An entourage of the diagonal in `α` and an entourage in `β` yield an entourage in `α × β`
once we permute coordinates. -/
def entourageProd (u : Set (α × α)) (v : Set (β × β)) : Set ((α × β) × α × β) :=
{((a₁, b₁),(a₂, b₂)) | (a₁, a₂) ∈ u ∧ (b₁, b₂) ∈ v}
theorem mem_entourageProd {u : Set (α × α)} {v : Set (β × β)} {p : (α × β) × α × β} :
p ∈ entourageProd u v ↔ (p.1.1, p.2.1) ∈ u ∧ (p.1.2, p.2.2) ∈ v := Iff.rfl
theorem entourageProd_mem_uniformity [t₁ : UniformSpace α] [t₂ : UniformSpace β] {u : Set (α × α)}
{v : Set (β × β)} (hu : u ∈ 𝓤 α) (hv : v ∈ 𝓤 β) :
entourageProd u v ∈ 𝓤 (α × β) := by
rw [uniformity_prod]; exact inter_mem_inf (preimage_mem_comap hu) (preimage_mem_comap hv)
theorem ball_entourageProd (u : Set (α × α)) (v : Set (β × β)) (x : α × β) :
ball x (entourageProd u v) = ball x.1 u ×ˢ ball x.2 v := by
ext p; simp only [ball, entourageProd, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_prod, Set.mem_preimage]
lemma IsSymmetricRel.entourageProd {u : Set (α × α)} {v : Set (β × β)}
(hu : IsSymmetricRel u) (hv : IsSymmetricRel v) :
IsSymmetricRel (entourageProd u v) :=
Set.ext fun _ ↦ and_congr hu.mk_mem_comm hv.mk_mem_comm
theorem Filter.HasBasis.uniformity_prod {ιa ιb : Type*} [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
{pa : ιa → Prop} {pb : ιb → Prop} {sa : ιa → Set (α × α)} {sb : ιb → Set (β × β)}
(ha : (𝓤 α).HasBasis pa sa) (hb : (𝓤 β).HasBasis pb sb) :
(𝓤 (α × β)).HasBasis (fun i : ιa × ιb ↦ pa i.1 ∧ pb i.2)
(fun i ↦ entourageProd (sa i.1) (sb i.2)) :=
(ha.comap _).inf (hb.comap _)
theorem entourageProd_subset [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
{s : Set ((α × β) × α × β)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 (α × β)) :
∃ u ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ v ∈ 𝓤 β, entourageProd u v ⊆ s := by
rcases (((𝓤 α).basis_sets.uniformity_prod (𝓤 β).basis_sets).mem_iff' s).1 h with ⟨w, hw⟩
use w.1, hw.1.1, w.2, hw.1.2, hw.2
theorem tendsto_prod_uniformity_fst [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
Tendsto (fun p : (α × β) × α × β => (p.1.1, p.2.1)) (𝓤 (α × β)) (𝓤 α) :=
le_trans (map_mono inf_le_left) map_comap_le
theorem tendsto_prod_uniformity_snd [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
Tendsto (fun p : (α × β) × α × β => (p.1.2, p.2.2)) (𝓤 (α × β)) (𝓤 β) :=
le_trans (map_mono inf_le_right) map_comap_le
theorem uniformContinuous_fst [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => p.1 :=
tendsto_prod_uniformity_fst
theorem uniformContinuous_snd [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => p.2 :=
tendsto_prod_uniformity_snd
variable [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] [UniformSpace γ]
theorem UniformContinuous.prodMk {f₁ : α → β} {f₂ : α → γ} (h₁ : UniformContinuous f₁)
(h₂ : UniformContinuous f₂) : UniformContinuous fun a => (f₁ a, f₂ a) := by
rw [UniformContinuous, uniformity_prod]
exact tendsto_inf.2 ⟨tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₁, tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₂⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias UniformContinuous.prod_mk := UniformContinuous.prodMk
theorem UniformContinuous.prodMk_left {f : α × β → γ} (h : UniformContinuous f) (b) :
UniformContinuous fun a => f (a, b) :=
h.comp (uniformContinuous_id.prodMk uniformContinuous_const)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias UniformContinuous.prod_mk_left := UniformContinuous.prodMk_left
theorem UniformContinuous.prodMk_right {f : α × β → γ} (h : UniformContinuous f) (a) :
UniformContinuous fun b => f (a, b) :=
h.comp (uniformContinuous_const.prodMk uniformContinuous_id)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias UniformContinuous.prod_mk_right := UniformContinuous.prodMk_right
theorem UniformContinuous.prodMap [UniformSpace δ] {f : α → γ} {g : β → δ}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) (hg : UniformContinuous g) : UniformContinuous (Prod.map f g) :=
(hf.comp uniformContinuous_fst).prodMk (hg.comp uniformContinuous_snd)
theorem toTopologicalSpace_prod {α} {β} [u : UniformSpace α] [v : UniformSpace β] :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace (α × β) instUniformSpaceProd =
@instTopologicalSpaceProd α β u.toTopologicalSpace v.toTopologicalSpace :=
rfl
/-- A version of `UniformContinuous.inf_dom_left` for binary functions -/
theorem uniformContinuous_inf_dom_left₂ {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {ua1 ua2 : UniformSpace α}
{ub1 ub2 : UniformSpace β} {uc1 : UniformSpace γ}
(h : by haveI := ua1; haveI := ub1; exact UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := ua1 ⊓ ua2; haveI := ub1 ⊓ ub2
exact UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2 := by
-- proof essentially copied from `continuous_inf_dom_left₂`
have ha := @UniformContinuous.inf_dom_left _ _ id ua1 ua2 ua1 (@uniformContinuous_id _ (id _))
have hb := @UniformContinuous.inf_dom_left _ _ id ub1 ub2 ub1 (@uniformContinuous_id _ (id _))
have h_unif_cont_id :=
@UniformContinuous.prodMap _ _ _ _ (ua1 ⊓ ua2) (ub1 ⊓ ub2) ua1 ub1 _ _ ha hb
exact @UniformContinuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ h h_unif_cont_id
/-- A version of `UniformContinuous.inf_dom_right` for binary functions -/
theorem uniformContinuous_inf_dom_right₂ {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {ua1 ua2 : UniformSpace α}
{ub1 ub2 : UniformSpace β} {uc1 : UniformSpace γ}
(h : by haveI := ua2; haveI := ub2; exact UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := ua1 ⊓ ua2; haveI := ub1 ⊓ ub2
exact UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2 := by
-- proof essentially copied from `continuous_inf_dom_right₂`
have ha := @UniformContinuous.inf_dom_right _ _ id ua1 ua2 ua2 (@uniformContinuous_id _ (id _))
have hb := @UniformContinuous.inf_dom_right _ _ id ub1 ub2 ub2 (@uniformContinuous_id _ (id _))
have h_unif_cont_id :=
@UniformContinuous.prodMap _ _ _ _ (ua1 ⊓ ua2) (ub1 ⊓ ub2) ua2 ub2 _ _ ha hb
exact @UniformContinuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ h h_unif_cont_id
/-- A version of `uniformContinuous_sInf_dom` for binary functions -/
theorem uniformContinuous_sInf_dom₂ {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {uas : Set (UniformSpace α)}
{ubs : Set (UniformSpace β)} {ua : UniformSpace α} {ub : UniformSpace β} {uc : UniformSpace γ}
(ha : ua ∈ uas) (hb : ub ∈ ubs) (hf : UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := sInf uas; haveI := sInf ubs
exact @UniformContinuous _ _ _ uc fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2 := by
-- proof essentially copied from `continuous_sInf_dom`
let _ : UniformSpace (α × β) := instUniformSpaceProd
have ha := uniformContinuous_sInf_dom ha uniformContinuous_id
have hb := uniformContinuous_sInf_dom hb uniformContinuous_id
have h_unif_cont_id := @UniformContinuous.prodMap _ _ _ _ (sInf uas) (sInf ubs) ua ub _ _ ha hb
exact @UniformContinuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ hf h_unif_cont_id
end Prod
section
open UniformSpace Function
variable {δ' : Type*} [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] [UniformSpace γ] [UniformSpace δ]
[UniformSpace δ']
local notation f " ∘₂ " g => Function.bicompr f g
/-- Uniform continuity for functions of two variables. -/
def UniformContinuous₂ (f : α → β → γ) :=
UniformContinuous (uncurry f)
theorem uniformContinuous₂_def (f : α → β → γ) :
UniformContinuous₂ f ↔ UniformContinuous (uncurry f) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem UniformContinuous₂.uniformContinuous {f : α → β → γ} (h : UniformContinuous₂ f) :
UniformContinuous (uncurry f) :=
h
theorem uniformContinuous₂_curry (f : α × β → γ) :
UniformContinuous₂ (Function.curry f) ↔ UniformContinuous f := by
rw [UniformContinuous₂, uncurry_curry]
theorem UniformContinuous₂.comp {f : α → β → γ} {g : γ → δ} (hg : UniformContinuous g)
(hf : UniformContinuous₂ f) : UniformContinuous₂ (g ∘₂ f) :=
hg.comp hf
theorem UniformContinuous₂.bicompl {f : α → β → γ} {ga : δ → α} {gb : δ' → β}
(hf : UniformContinuous₂ f) (hga : UniformContinuous ga) (hgb : UniformContinuous gb) :
UniformContinuous₂ (bicompl f ga gb) :=
hf.uniformContinuous.comp (hga.prodMap hgb)
end
theorem toTopologicalSpace_subtype [u : UniformSpace α] {p : α → Prop} :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace (Subtype p) instUniformSpaceSubtype =
@instTopologicalSpaceSubtype α p u.toTopologicalSpace :=
rfl
section Sum
variable [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
open Sum
-- Obsolete auxiliary definitions and lemmas
/-- Uniformity on a disjoint union. Entourages of the diagonal in the union are obtained
by taking independently an entourage of the diagonal in the first part, and an entourage of
the diagonal in the second part. -/
instance Sum.instUniformSpace : UniformSpace (α ⊕ β) where
uniformity := map (fun p : α × α => (inl p.1, inl p.2)) (𝓤 α) ⊔
map (fun p : β × β => (inr p.1, inr p.2)) (𝓤 β)
symm := fun _ hs ↦ ⟨symm_le_uniformity hs.1, symm_le_uniformity hs.2⟩
comp := fun s hs ↦ by
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs.1 with ⟨tα, htα, Htα⟩
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs.2 with ⟨tβ, htβ, Htβ⟩
filter_upwards [mem_lift' (union_mem_sup (image_mem_map htα) (image_mem_map htβ))]
rintro ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨z, ⟨⟨a, b⟩, hab, ⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨⟨a, b⟩, hab, ⟨⟩⟩, ⟨⟨_, c⟩, hbc, ⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨⟨_, c⟩, hbc, ⟨⟩⟩⟩
exacts [@Htα (_, _) ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩, @Htβ (_, _) ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩]
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity x := by
ext
cases x <;> simp [mem_comap', -mem_comap, nhds_inl, nhds_inr, nhds_eq_comap_uniformity,
Prod.ext_iff]
/-- The union of an entourage of the diagonal in each set of a disjoint union is again an entourage
of the diagonal. -/
theorem union_mem_uniformity_sum {a : Set (α × α)} (ha : a ∈ 𝓤 α) {b : Set (β × β)} (hb : b ∈ 𝓤 β) :
Prod.map inl inl '' a ∪ Prod.map inr inr '' b ∈ 𝓤 (α ⊕ β) :=
union_mem_sup (image_mem_map ha) (image_mem_map hb)
theorem Sum.uniformity : 𝓤 (α ⊕ β) = map (Prod.map inl inl) (𝓤 α) ⊔ map (Prod.map inr inr) (𝓤 β) :=
rfl
lemma uniformContinuous_inl : UniformContinuous (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) := le_sup_left
lemma uniformContinuous_inr : UniformContinuous (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) := le_sup_right
instance [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 α)] [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 β)] :
IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 (α ⊕ β)) := by
rw [Sum.uniformity]
infer_instance
end Sum
end Constructions
/-!
### Expressing continuity properties in uniform spaces
We reformulate the various continuity properties of functions taking values in a uniform space
in terms of the uniformity in the target. Since the same lemmas (essentially with the same names)
also exist for metric spaces and emetric spaces (reformulating things in terms of the distance or
the edistance in the target), we put them in a namespace `Uniform` here.
In the metric and emetric space setting, there are also similar lemmas where one assumes that
both the source and the target are metric spaces, reformulating things in terms of the distance
on both sides. These lemmas are generally written without primes, and the versions where only
the target is a metric space is primed. We follow the same convention here, thus giving lemmas
with primes.
-/
namespace Uniform
variable [UniformSpace α]
theorem tendsto_nhds_right {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (a, u x)) f (𝓤 α) := by
rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
theorem tendsto_nhds_left {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (u x, a)) f (𝓤 α) := by
rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity', tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
theorem continuousAt_iff'_right [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} :
ContinuousAt f b ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f b, f x)) (𝓝 b) (𝓤 α) := by
rw [ContinuousAt, tendsto_nhds_right]
theorem continuousAt_iff'_left [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} :
ContinuousAt f b ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f x, f b)) (𝓝 b) (𝓤 α) := by
rw [ContinuousAt, tendsto_nhds_left]
theorem continuousAt_iff_prod [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} :
ContinuousAt f b ↔ Tendsto (fun x : β × β => (f x.1, f x.2)) (𝓝 (b, b)) (𝓤 α) :=
⟨fun H => le_trans (H.prodMap' H) (nhds_le_uniformity _), fun H =>
continuousAt_iff'_left.2 <| H.comp <| tendsto_id.prodMk_nhds tendsto_const_nhds⟩
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff'_right [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s b ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f b, f x)) (𝓝[s] b) (𝓤 α) := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhds_right]
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff'_left [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s b ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f x, f b)) (𝓝[s] b) (𝓤 α) := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhds_left]
theorem continuousOn_iff'_right [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, Tendsto (fun x => (f b, f x)) (𝓝[s] b) (𝓤 α) := by
simp [ContinuousOn, continuousWithinAt_iff'_right]
theorem continuousOn_iff'_left [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, Tendsto (fun x => (f x, f b)) (𝓝[s] b) (𝓤 α) := by
simp [ContinuousOn, continuousWithinAt_iff'_left]
theorem continuous_iff'_right [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ b, Tendsto (fun x => (f b, f x)) (𝓝 b) (𝓤 α) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => tendsto_nhds_right
theorem continuous_iff'_left [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ b, Tendsto (fun x => (f x, f b)) (𝓝 b) (𝓤 α) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => tendsto_nhds_left
/-- Consider two functions `f` and `g` which coincide on a set `s` and are continuous there.
Then there is an open neighborhood of `s` on which `f` and `g` are uniformly close. -/
lemma exists_is_open_mem_uniformity_of_forall_mem_eq
[TopologicalSpace β] {r : Set (α × α)} {s : Set β}
{f g : β → α} (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ContinuousAt f x) (hg : ∀ x ∈ s, ContinuousAt g x)
(hfg : s.EqOn f g) (hr : r ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t, IsOpen t ∧ s ⊆ t ∧ ∀ x ∈ t, (f x, g x) ∈ r := by
have A : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t, IsOpen t ∧ x ∈ t ∧ ∀ z ∈ t, (f z, g z) ∈ r := by
intro x hx
obtain ⟨t, ht, htsymm, htr⟩ := comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets hr
have A : {z | (f x, f z) ∈ t} ∈ 𝓝 x := (hf x hx).preimage_mem_nhds (mem_nhds_left (f x) ht)
have B : {z | (g x, g z) ∈ t} ∈ 𝓝 x := (hg x hx).preimage_mem_nhds (mem_nhds_left (g x) ht)
rcases _root_.mem_nhds_iff.1 (inter_mem A B) with ⟨u, hu, u_open, xu⟩
refine ⟨u, u_open, xu, fun y hy ↦ ?_⟩
have I1 : (f y, f x) ∈ t := (htsymm.mk_mem_comm).2 (hu hy).1
have I2 : (g x, g y) ∈ t := (hu hy).2
rw [hfg hx] at I1
exact htr (prodMk_mem_compRel I1 I2)
choose! t t_open xt ht using A
refine ⟨⋃ x ∈ s, t x, isOpen_biUnion t_open, fun x hx ↦ mem_biUnion hx (xt x hx), ?_⟩
rintro x hx
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨y, ys, hy⟩
exact ht y ys x hy
end Uniform
| theorem Filter.Tendsto.congr_uniformity {α β} [UniformSpace β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} {b : β}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 b)) (hg : Tendsto (fun x => (f x, g x)) l (𝓤 β)) : Tendsto g l (𝓝 b) :=
Uniform.tendsto_nhds_right.2 <| (Uniform.tendsto_nhds_right.1 hf).uniformity_trans hg
theorem Uniform.tendsto_congr {α β} [UniformSpace β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} {b : β}
(hfg : Tendsto (fun x => (f x, g x)) l (𝓤 β)) : Tendsto f l (𝓝 b) ↔ Tendsto g l (𝓝 b) :=
⟨fun h => h.congr_uniformity hfg, fun h => h.congr_uniformity hfg.uniformity_symm⟩
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean | 987 | 996 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bitwise
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PSub
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Size
import Mathlib.Data.Num.Bitwise
/-!
# Properties of the binary representation of integers
-/
open Int
attribute [local simp] add_assoc
namespace PosNum
variable {α : Type*}
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one [One α] [Add α] : ((1 : PosNum) : α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_one' [One α] [Add α] : (PosNum.one : α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit0 [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (n.bit0 : α) = (n : α) + n :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit1 [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (n.bit1 : α) = ((n : α) + n) + 1 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_nat [AddMonoidWithOne α] : ∀ n : PosNum, ((n : ℕ) : α) = n
| 1 => Nat.cast_one
| bit0 p => by dsimp; rw [Nat.cast_add, p.cast_to_nat]
| bit1 p => by dsimp; rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, p.cast_to_nat]
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_to_int (n : PosNum) : ((n : ℕ) : ℤ) = n :=
cast_to_nat _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_int [AddGroupWithOne α] (n : PosNum) : ((n : ℤ) : α) = n := by
rw [← to_nat_to_int, Int.cast_natCast, cast_to_nat]
theorem succ_to_nat : ∀ n, (succ n : ℕ) = n + 1
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 _ => rfl
| bit1 p =>
(congr_arg (fun n ↦ n + n) (succ_to_nat p)).trans <|
show ↑p + 1 + ↑p + 1 = ↑p + ↑p + 1 + 1 by simp [add_left_comm]
theorem one_add (n : PosNum) : 1 + n = succ n := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem add_one (n : PosNum) : n + 1 = succ n := by cases n <;> rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m + n : PosNum) : ℕ) = m + n
| 1, b => by rw [one_add b, succ_to_nat, add_comm, cast_one]
| a, 1 => by rw [add_one a, succ_to_nat, cast_one]
| bit0 a, bit0 b => (congr_arg (fun n ↦ n + n) (add_to_nat a b)).trans <| add_add_add_comm _ _ _ _
| bit0 a, bit1 b =>
(congr_arg (fun n ↦ (n + n) + 1) (add_to_nat a b)).trans <|
show (a + b + (a + b) + 1 : ℕ) = a + a + (b + b + 1) by simp [add_left_comm]
| bit1 a, bit0 b =>
(congr_arg (fun n ↦ (n + n) + 1) (add_to_nat a b)).trans <|
show (a + b + (a + b) + 1 : ℕ) = a + a + 1 + (b + b) by simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
| bit1 a, bit1 b =>
show (succ (a + b) + succ (a + b) : ℕ) = a + a + 1 + (b + b + 1) by
rw [succ_to_nat, add_to_nat a b]; simp [add_left_comm]
theorem add_succ : ∀ m n : PosNum, m + succ n = succ (m + n)
| 1, b => by simp [one_add]
| bit0 a, 1 => congr_arg bit0 (add_one a)
| bit1 a, 1 => congr_arg bit1 (add_one a)
| bit0 _, bit0 _ => rfl
| bit0 a, bit1 b => congr_arg bit0 (add_succ a b)
| bit1 _, bit0 _ => rfl
| bit1 a, bit1 b => congr_arg bit1 (add_succ a b)
theorem bit0_of_bit0 : ∀ n, n + n = bit0 n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 p => congr_arg bit0 (bit0_of_bit0 p)
| bit1 p => show bit0 (succ (p + p)) = _ by rw [bit0_of_bit0 p, succ]
theorem bit1_of_bit1 (n : PosNum) : (n + n) + 1 = bit1 n :=
show (n + n) + 1 = bit1 n by rw [add_one, bit0_of_bit0, succ]
@[norm_cast]
theorem mul_to_nat (m) : ∀ n, ((m * n : PosNum) : ℕ) = m * n
| 1 => (mul_one _).symm
| bit0 p => show (↑(m * p) + ↑(m * p) : ℕ) = ↑m * (p + p) by rw [mul_to_nat m p, left_distrib]
| bit1 p =>
(add_to_nat (bit0 (m * p)) m).trans <|
show (↑(m * p) + ↑(m * p) + ↑m : ℕ) = ↑m * (p + p) + m by rw [mul_to_nat m p, left_distrib]
theorem to_nat_pos : ∀ n : PosNum, 0 < (n : ℕ)
| 1 => Nat.zero_lt_one
| bit0 p =>
let h := to_nat_pos p
add_pos h h
| bit1 _p => Nat.succ_pos _
theorem cmp_to_nat_lemma {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) < n → (bit1 m : ℕ) < bit0 n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n → (m + m + 1 + 1 : ℕ) ≤ n + n by
intro h; rw [Nat.add_right_comm m m 1, add_assoc]; exact Nat.add_le_add h h
theorem cmp_swap (m) : ∀ n, (cmp m n).swap = cmp n m := by
induction' m with m IH m IH <;> intro n <;> obtain - | n | n := n <;> unfold cmp <;>
try { rfl } <;> rw [← IH] <;> cases cmp m n <;> rfl
theorem cmp_to_nat : ∀ m n, (Ordering.casesOn (cmp m n) ((m : ℕ) < n) (m = n) ((n : ℕ) < m) : Prop)
| 1, 1 => rfl
| bit0 a, 1 =>
let h : (1 : ℕ) ≤ a := to_nat_pos a
Nat.add_le_add h h
| bit1 a, 1 => Nat.succ_lt_succ <| to_nat_pos <| bit0 a
| 1, bit0 b =>
let h : (1 : ℕ) ≤ b := to_nat_pos b
Nat.add_le_add h h
| 1, bit1 b => Nat.succ_lt_succ <| to_nat_pos <| bit0 b
| bit0 a, bit0 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.add_lt_add this this
· rw [this]
· exact Nat.add_lt_add this this
| bit0 a, bit1 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.le_succ_of_le (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
· rw [this]
apply Nat.lt_succ_self
· exact cmp_to_nat_lemma this
| bit1 a, bit0 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact cmp_to_nat_lemma this
· rw [this]
apply Nat.lt_succ_self
· exact Nat.le_succ_of_le (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
| bit1 a, bit1 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
· rw [this]
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
@[norm_cast]
theorem lt_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) < n ↔ m < n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt from
match cmp m n, cmp_to_nat m n with
| Ordering.lt, h => by simp only at h; simp [h]
| Ordering.eq, h => by simp only at h; simp [h, lt_irrefl]
| Ordering.gt, h => by simp [not_lt_of_gt h]
@[norm_cast]
theorem le_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr lt_to_nat
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem add_zero (n : Num) : n + 0 = n := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem zero_add (n : Num) : 0 + n = n := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem add_one : ∀ n : Num, n + 1 = succ n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by cases p <;> rfl
theorem add_succ : ∀ m n : Num, m + succ n = succ (m + n)
| 0, n => by simp [zero_add]
| pos p, 0 => show pos (p + 1) = succ (pos p + 0) by rw [PosNum.add_one, add_zero, succ, succ']
| pos _, pos _ => congr_arg pos (PosNum.add_succ _ _)
theorem bit0_of_bit0 : ∀ n : Num, n + n = n.bit0
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => congr_arg pos p.bit0_of_bit0
theorem bit1_of_bit1 : ∀ n : Num, (n + n) + 1 = n.bit1
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => congr_arg pos p.bit1_of_bit1
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_zero : Num.ofNat' 0 = 0 := by simp [Num.ofNat']
theorem ofNat'_bit (b n) : ofNat' (Nat.bit b n) = cond b Num.bit1 Num.bit0 (ofNat' n) :=
Nat.binaryRec_eq _ _ (.inl rfl)
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_one : Num.ofNat' 1 = 1 := by erw [ofNat'_bit true 0, cond, ofNat'_zero]; rfl
theorem bit1_succ : ∀ n : Num, n.bit1.succ = n.succ.bit0
| 0 => rfl
| pos _n => rfl
theorem ofNat'_succ : ∀ {n}, ofNat' (n + 1) = ofNat' n + 1 :=
@(Nat.binaryRec (by simp [zero_add]) fun b n ih => by
cases b
· erw [ofNat'_bit true n, ofNat'_bit]
simp only [← bit1_of_bit1, ← bit0_of_bit0, cond]
· rw [show n.bit true + 1 = (n + 1).bit false by simp [Nat.bit, mul_add],
ofNat'_bit, ofNat'_bit, ih]
simp only [cond, add_one, bit1_succ])
@[simp]
theorem add_ofNat' (m n) : Num.ofNat' (m + n) = Num.ofNat' m + Num.ofNat' n := by
induction n
· simp only [Nat.add_zero, ofNat'_zero, add_zero]
· simp only [Nat.add_succ, Nat.add_zero, ofNat'_succ, add_one, add_succ, *]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_zero [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : ((0 : Num) : α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_zero' [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : (Num.zero : α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : ((1 : Num) : α) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_pos [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (Num.pos n : α) = n :=
rfl
theorem succ'_to_nat : ∀ n, (succ' n : ℕ) = n + 1
| 0 => (Nat.zero_add _).symm
| pos _p => PosNum.succ_to_nat _
theorem succ_to_nat (n) : (succ n : ℕ) = n + 1 :=
succ'_to_nat n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_nat [AddMonoidWithOne α] : ∀ n : Num, ((n : ℕ) : α) = n
| 0 => Nat.cast_zero
| pos p => p.cast_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m + n : Num) : ℕ) = m + n
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos _q => (Nat.zero_add _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => rfl
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.add_to_nat _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem mul_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m * n : Num) : ℕ) = m * n
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos _q => (zero_mul _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => rfl
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.mul_to_nat _ _
theorem cmp_to_nat : ∀ m n, (Ordering.casesOn (cmp m n) ((m : ℕ) < n) (m = n) ((n : ℕ) < m) : Prop)
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos _ => to_nat_pos _
| pos _, 0 => to_nat_pos _
| pos a, pos b => by
have := PosNum.cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; dsimp [cmp]; cases PosNum.cmp a b
exacts [id, congr_arg pos, id]
@[norm_cast]
theorem lt_to_nat {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) < n ↔ m < n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt from
match cmp m n, cmp_to_nat m n with
| Ordering.lt, h => by simp only at h; simp [h]
| Ordering.eq, h => by simp only at h; simp [h, lt_irrefl]
| Ordering.gt, h => by simp [not_lt_of_gt h]
@[norm_cast]
theorem le_to_nat {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr lt_to_nat
end Num
namespace PosNum
@[simp]
theorem of_to_nat' : ∀ n : PosNum, Num.ofNat' (n : ℕ) = Num.pos n
| 1 => by erw [@Num.ofNat'_bit true 0, Num.ofNat'_zero]; rfl
| bit0 p => by
simpa only [Nat.bit_false, cond_false, two_mul, of_to_nat' p] using Num.ofNat'_bit false p
| bit1 p => by
simpa only [Nat.bit_true, cond_true, two_mul, of_to_nat' p] using Num.ofNat'_bit true p
end PosNum
namespace Num
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat' : ∀ n : Num, Num.ofNat' (n : ℕ) = n
| 0 => ofNat'_zero
| pos p => p.of_to_nat'
lemma toNat_injective : Function.Injective (castNum : Num → ℕ) :=
Function.LeftInverse.injective of_to_nat'
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_inj {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) = n ↔ m = n := toNat_injective.eq_iff
/-- This tactic tries to turn an (in)equality about `Num`s to one about `Nat`s by rewriting.
```lean
example (n : Num) (m : Num) : n ≤ n + m := by
transfer_rw
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer_rw) "transfer_rw" : tactic => `(tactic|
(repeat first | rw [← to_nat_inj] | rw [← lt_to_nat] | rw [← le_to_nat]
repeat first | rw [add_to_nat] | rw [mul_to_nat] | rw [cast_one] | rw [cast_zero]))
/--
This tactic tries to prove (in)equalities about `Num`s by transferring them to the `Nat` world and
then trying to call `simp`.
```lean
example (n : Num) (m : Num) : n ≤ n + m := by transfer
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer) "transfer" : tactic => `(tactic|
(intros; transfer_rw; try simp))
instance addMonoid : AddMonoid Num where
add := (· + ·)
zero := 0
zero_add := zero_add
add_zero := add_zero
add_assoc := by transfer
nsmul := nsmulRec
instance addMonoidWithOne : AddMonoidWithOne Num :=
{ Num.addMonoid with
natCast := Num.ofNat'
one := 1
natCast_zero := ofNat'_zero
natCast_succ := fun _ => ofNat'_succ }
instance commSemiring : CommSemiring Num where
__ := Num.addMonoid
__ := Num.addMonoidWithOne
mul := (· * ·)
npow := @npowRec Num ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩
mul_zero _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_zero, mul_zero]
zero_mul _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_zero, zero_mul]
mul_one _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_one, mul_one]
one_mul _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_one, one_mul]
add_comm _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, add_to_nat, add_comm]
mul_comm _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, mul_comm]
mul_assoc _ _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, mul_assoc]
left_distrib _ _ _ := by simp only [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, add_to_nat, mul_add]
right_distrib _ _ _ := by simp only [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, add_to_nat, add_mul]
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder Num where
lt_iff_le_not_le a b := by simp only [← lt_to_nat, ← le_to_nat, lt_iff_le_not_le]
le_refl := by transfer
le_trans a b c := by transfer_rw; apply le_trans
le_antisymm a b := by transfer_rw; apply le_antisymm
instance isOrderedCancelAddMonoid : IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid Num where
add_le_add_left a b h c := by revert h; transfer_rw; exact fun h => add_le_add_left h c
le_of_add_le_add_left a b c :=
show a + b ≤ a + c → b ≤ c by transfer_rw; apply le_of_add_le_add_left
instance linearOrder : LinearOrder Num :=
{ le_total := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_total
toDecidableLT := Num.decidableLT
toDecidableLE := Num.decidableLE
-- This is relying on an automatically generated instance name,
-- generated in a `deriving` handler.
-- See https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2343
toDecidableEq := instDecidableEqNum }
instance isStrictOrderedRing : IsStrictOrderedRing Num :=
{ zero_le_one := by decide
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, by decide⟩ }
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_of_nat (m n) : ((m + n : ℕ) : Num) = m + n :=
add_ofNat' _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_to_int (n : Num) : ((n : ℕ) : ℤ) = n :=
cast_to_nat _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_int {α} [AddGroupWithOne α] (n : Num) : ((n : ℤ) : α) = n := by
rw [← to_nat_to_int, Int.cast_natCast, cast_to_nat]
theorem to_of_nat : ∀ n : ℕ, ((n : Num) : ℕ) = n
| 0 => by rw [Nat.cast_zero, cast_zero]
| n + 1 => by rw [Nat.cast_succ, add_one, succ_to_nat, to_of_nat n]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem of_natCast {α} [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n : ℕ) : ((n : Num) : α) = n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, to_of_nat]
@[norm_cast]
theorem of_nat_inj {m n : ℕ} : (m : Num) = n ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => Function.LeftInverse.injective to_of_nat h, congr_arg _⟩
-- The priority should be `high`er than `cast_to_nat`.
@[simp high, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat : ∀ n : Num, ((n : ℕ) : Num) = n :=
of_to_nat'
@[norm_cast]
theorem dvd_to_nat (m n : Num) : (m : ℕ) ∣ n ↔ m ∣ n :=
⟨fun ⟨k, e⟩ => ⟨k, by rw [← of_to_nat n, e]; simp⟩, fun ⟨k, e⟩ => ⟨k, by simp [e, mul_to_nat]⟩⟩
end Num
namespace PosNum
variable {α : Type*}
open Num
-- The priority should be `high`er than `cast_to_nat`.
@[simp high, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat : ∀ n : PosNum, ((n : ℕ) : Num) = Num.pos n :=
of_to_nat'
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_inj {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) = n ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => Num.pos.inj <| by rw [← PosNum.of_to_nat, ← PosNum.of_to_nat, h], congr_arg _⟩
theorem pred'_to_nat : ∀ n, (pred' n : ℕ) = Nat.pred n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 n =>
have : Nat.succ ↑(pred' n) = ↑n := by
rw [pred'_to_nat n, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (to_nat_pos n)]
match (motive :=
∀ k : Num, Nat.succ ↑k = ↑n → ↑(Num.casesOn k 1 bit1 : PosNum) = Nat.pred (n + n))
pred' n, this with
| 0, (h : ((1 : Num) : ℕ) = n) => by rw [← to_nat_inj.1 h]; rfl
| Num.pos p, (h : Nat.succ ↑p = n) => by rw [← h]; exact (Nat.succ_add p p).symm
| bit1 _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem pred'_succ' (n) : pred' (succ' n) = n :=
Num.to_nat_inj.1 <| by rw [pred'_to_nat, succ'_to_nat, Nat.add_one, Nat.pred_succ]
@[simp]
theorem succ'_pred' (n) : succ' (pred' n) = n :=
to_nat_inj.1 <| by
rw [succ'_to_nat, pred'_to_nat, Nat.add_one, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (to_nat_pos _)]
instance dvd : Dvd PosNum :=
⟨fun m n => pos m ∣ pos n⟩
@[norm_cast]
theorem dvd_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) ∣ n ↔ m ∣ n :=
Num.dvd_to_nat (pos m) (pos n)
theorem size_to_nat : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = Nat.size n
| 1 => Nat.size_one.symm
| bit0 n => by
rw [size, succ_to_nat, size_to_nat n, cast_bit0, ← two_mul]
erw [@Nat.size_bit false n]
have := to_nat_pos n
dsimp [Nat.bit]; omega
| bit1 n => by
rw [size, succ_to_nat, size_to_nat n, cast_bit1, ← two_mul]
erw [@Nat.size_bit true n]
dsimp [Nat.bit]; omega
theorem size_eq_natSize : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = natSize n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 n => by rw [size, succ_to_nat, natSize, size_eq_natSize n]
| bit1 n => by rw [size, succ_to_nat, natSize, size_eq_natSize n]
theorem natSize_to_nat (n) : natSize n = Nat.size n := by rw [← size_eq_natSize, size_to_nat]
theorem natSize_pos (n) : 0 < natSize n := by cases n <;> apply Nat.succ_pos
/-- This tactic tries to turn an (in)equality about `PosNum`s to one about `Nat`s by rewriting.
```lean
example (n : PosNum) (m : PosNum) : n ≤ n + m := by
transfer_rw
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer_rw) "transfer_rw" : tactic => `(tactic|
(repeat first | rw [← to_nat_inj] | rw [← lt_to_nat] | rw [← le_to_nat]
repeat first | rw [add_to_nat] | rw [mul_to_nat] | rw [cast_one] | rw [cast_zero]))
/--
This tactic tries to prove (in)equalities about `PosNum`s by transferring them to the `Nat` world
and then trying to call `simp`.
```lean
example (n : PosNum) (m : PosNum) : n ≤ n + m := by transfer
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer) "transfer" : tactic => `(tactic|
(intros; transfer_rw; try simp [add_comm, add_left_comm, mul_comm, mul_left_comm]))
instance addCommSemigroup : AddCommSemigroup PosNum where
add := (· + ·)
add_assoc := by transfer
add_comm := by transfer
instance commMonoid : CommMonoid PosNum where
mul := (· * ·)
one := (1 : PosNum)
npow := @npowRec PosNum ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩
mul_assoc := by transfer
one_mul := by transfer
mul_one := by transfer
mul_comm := by transfer
instance distrib : Distrib PosNum where
add := (· + ·)
mul := (· * ·)
left_distrib := by transfer; simp [mul_add]
right_distrib := by transfer; simp [mul_add, mul_comm]
instance linearOrder : LinearOrder PosNum where
lt := (· < ·)
lt_iff_le_not_le := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply lt_iff_le_not_le
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl := by transfer
le_trans := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply le_trans
le_antisymm := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_antisymm
le_total := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_total
toDecidableLT := by infer_instance
toDecidableLE := by infer_instance
toDecidableEq := by infer_instance
@[simp]
theorem cast_to_num (n : PosNum) : ↑n = Num.pos n := by rw [← cast_to_nat, ← of_to_nat n]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem bit_to_nat (b n) : (bit b n : ℕ) = Nat.bit b n := by cases b <;> simp [bit, two_mul]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_add [AddMonoidWithOne α] (m n) : ((m + n : PosNum) : α) = m + n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, add_to_nat, Nat.cast_add, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
@[simp 500, norm_cast]
theorem cast_succ [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n : PosNum) : (succ n : α) = n + 1 := by
rw [← add_one, cast_add, cast_one]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_inj [AddMonoidWithOne α] [CharZero α] {m n : PosNum} : (m : α) = n ↔ m = n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_inj, to_nat_inj]
@[simp]
theorem one_le_cast [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] (n : PosNum) :
(1 : α) ≤ n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, ← Nat.cast_one, Nat.cast_le (α := α)]; apply to_nat_pos
@[simp]
theorem cast_pos [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] (n : PosNum) : 0 < (n : α) :=
lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (one_le_cast n)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_mul [NonAssocSemiring α] (m n) : ((m * n : PosNum) : α) = m * n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, mul_to_nat, Nat.cast_mul, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
@[simp]
theorem cmp_eq (m n) : cmp m n = Ordering.eq ↔ m = n := by
have := cmp_to_nat m n
-- Porting note: `cases` didn't rewrite at `this`, so `revert` & `intro` are required.
revert this; cases cmp m n <;> intro this <;> simp at this ⊢ <;> try { exact this } <;>
simp [show m ≠ n from fun e => by rw [e] at this;exact lt_irrefl _ this]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_lt [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : PosNum} :
(m : α) < n ↔ m < n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_lt (α := α), lt_to_nat]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_le [Semiring α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : PosNum} :
(m : α) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr cast_lt
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem bit_to_nat (b n) : (bit b n : ℕ) = Nat.bit b n := by
cases b <;> cases n <;> simp [bit, two_mul] <;> rfl
theorem cast_succ' [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n) : (succ' n : α) = n + 1 := by
rw [← PosNum.cast_to_nat, succ'_to_nat, Nat.cast_add_one, cast_to_nat]
theorem cast_succ [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n) : (succ n : α) = n + 1 :=
cast_succ' n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_add [AddMonoidWithOne α] (m n) : ((m + n : Num) : α) = m + n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, add_to_nat, Nat.cast_add, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit0 [NonAssocSemiring α] (n : Num) : (n.bit0 : α) = 2 * (n : α) := by
rw [← bit0_of_bit0, two_mul, cast_add]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit1 [NonAssocSemiring α] (n : Num) : (n.bit1 : α) = 2 * (n : α) + 1 := by
rw [← bit1_of_bit1, bit0_of_bit0, cast_add, cast_bit0]; rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_mul [NonAssocSemiring α] : ∀ m n, ((m * n : Num) : α) = m * n
| 0, 0 => (zero_mul _).symm
| 0, pos _q => (zero_mul _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => (mul_zero _).symm
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.cast_mul _ _
theorem size_to_nat : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = Nat.size n
| 0 => Nat.size_zero.symm
| pos p => p.size_to_nat
theorem size_eq_natSize : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = natSize n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => p.size_eq_natSize
theorem natSize_to_nat (n) : natSize n = Nat.size n := by rw [← size_eq_natSize, size_to_nat]
@[simp 999]
theorem ofNat'_eq : ∀ n, Num.ofNat' n = n :=
Nat.binaryRec (by simp) fun b n IH => by tauto
theorem zneg_toZNum (n : Num) : -n.toZNum = n.toZNumNeg := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem zneg_toZNumNeg (n : Num) : -n.toZNumNeg = n.toZNum := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem toZNum_inj {m n : Num} : m.toZNum = n.toZNum ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => by cases m <;> cases n <;> cases h <;> rfl, congr_arg _⟩
@[simp]
theorem cast_toZNum [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] [Neg α] : ∀ n : Num, (n.toZNum : α) = n
| 0 => rfl
| Num.pos _p => rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_toZNumNeg [SubtractionMonoid α] [One α] : ∀ n : Num, (n.toZNumNeg : α) = -n
| 0 => neg_zero.symm
| Num.pos _p => rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_toZNum (m n : Num) : Num.toZNum (m + n) = m.toZNum + n.toZNum := by
cases m <;> cases n <;> rfl
end Num
namespace PosNum
open Num
theorem pred_to_nat {n : PosNum} (h : 1 < n) : (pred n : ℕ) = Nat.pred n := by
unfold pred
cases e : pred' n
· have : (1 : ℕ) ≤ Nat.pred n := Nat.pred_le_pred ((@cast_lt ℕ _ _ _).2 h)
rw [← pred'_to_nat, e] at this
exact absurd this (by decide)
· rw [← pred'_to_nat, e]
rfl
theorem sub'_one (a : PosNum) : sub' a 1 = (pred' a).toZNum := by cases a <;> rfl
theorem one_sub' (a : PosNum) : sub' 1 a = (pred' a).toZNumNeg := by cases a <;> rfl
theorem lt_iff_cmp {m n} : m < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt :=
Iff.rfl
theorem le_iff_cmp {m n} : m ≤ n ↔ cmp m n ≠ Ordering.gt :=
not_congr <| lt_iff_cmp.trans <| by rw [← cmp_swap]; cases cmp m n <;> decide
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem pred_to_nat : ∀ n : Num, (pred n : ℕ) = Nat.pred n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by rw [pred, PosNum.pred'_to_nat]; rfl
theorem ppred_to_nat : ∀ n : Num, (↑) <$> ppred n = Nat.ppred n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by
rw [ppred, Option.map_some, Nat.ppred_eq_some.2]
rw [PosNum.pred'_to_nat, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (PosNum.to_nat_pos _)]
rfl
theorem cmp_swap (m n) : (cmp m n).swap = cmp n m := by
cases m <;> cases n <;> try { rfl }; apply PosNum.cmp_swap
theorem cmp_eq (m n) : cmp m n = Ordering.eq ↔ m = n := by
have := cmp_to_nat m n
-- Porting note: `cases` didn't rewrite at `this`, so `revert` & `intro` are required.
revert this; cases cmp m n <;> intro this <;> simp at this ⊢ <;> try { exact this } <;>
simp [show m ≠ n from fun e => by rw [e] at this; exact lt_irrefl _ this]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_lt [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : Num} :
(m : α) < n ↔ m < n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_lt (α := α), lt_to_nat]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_le [Semiring α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : Num} :
(m : α) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr cast_lt
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_inj [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {m n : Num} :
(m : α) = n ↔ m = n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_inj, to_nat_inj]
theorem lt_iff_cmp {m n} : m < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt :=
Iff.rfl
theorem le_iff_cmp {m n} : m ≤ n ↔ cmp m n ≠ Ordering.gt :=
not_congr <| lt_iff_cmp.trans <| by rw [← cmp_swap]; cases cmp m n <;> decide
theorem castNum_eq_bitwise {f : Num → Num → Num} {g : Bool → Bool → Bool}
(p : PosNum → PosNum → Num)
(gff : g false false = false) (f00 : f 0 0 = 0)
(f0n : ∀ n, f 0 (pos n) = cond (g false true) (pos n) 0)
(fn0 : ∀ n, f (pos n) 0 = cond (g true false) (pos n) 0)
(fnn : ∀ m n, f (pos m) (pos n) = p m n) (p11 : p 1 1 = cond (g true true) 1 0)
(p1b : ∀ b n, p 1 (PosNum.bit b n) = bit (g true b) (cond (g false true) (pos n) 0))
(pb1 : ∀ a m, p (PosNum.bit a m) 1 = bit (g a true) (cond (g true false) (pos m) 0))
(pbb : ∀ a b m n, p (PosNum.bit a m) (PosNum.bit b n) = bit (g a b) (p m n)) :
∀ m n : Num, (f m n : ℕ) = Nat.bitwise g m n := by
intros m n
obtain - | m := m <;> obtain - | n := n <;>
try simp only [show zero = 0 from rfl, show ((0 : Num) : ℕ) = 0 from rfl]
· rw [f00, Nat.bitwise_zero]; rfl
· rw [f0n, Nat.bitwise_zero_left]
cases g false true <;> rfl
· rw [fn0, Nat.bitwise_zero_right]
cases g true false <;> rfl
· rw [fnn]
have this b (n : PosNum) : (cond b (↑n) 0 : ℕ) = ↑(cond b (pos n) 0 : Num) := by
cases b <;> rfl
have this' b (n : PosNum) : ↑ (pos (PosNum.bit b n)) = Nat.bit b ↑n := by
cases b <;> simp
induction' m with m IH m IH generalizing n <;> obtain - | n | n := n
any_goals simp only [show one = 1 from rfl, show pos 1 = 1 from rfl,
show PosNum.bit0 = PosNum.bit false from rfl, show PosNum.bit1 = PosNum.bit true from rfl,
show ((1 : Num) : ℕ) = Nat.bit true 0 from rfl]
all_goals
repeat rw [this']
rw [Nat.bitwise_bit gff]
any_goals rw [Nat.bitwise_zero, p11]; cases g true true <;> rfl
any_goals rw [Nat.bitwise_zero_left, ← Bool.cond_eq_ite, this, ← bit_to_nat, p1b]
any_goals rw [Nat.bitwise_zero_right, ← Bool.cond_eq_ite, this, ← bit_to_nat, pb1]
all_goals
rw [← show ∀ n : PosNum, ↑(p m n) = Nat.bitwise g ↑m ↑n from IH]
rw [← bit_to_nat, pbb]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_or : ∀ m n : Num, ↑(m ||| n) = (↑m ||| ↑n : ℕ) := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise fun x y => pos (PosNum.lor x y) <;>
(try rintro (_ | _)) <;> (try rintro (_ | _)) <;> intros <;> rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_and : ∀ m n : Num, ↑(m &&& n) = (↑m &&& ↑n : ℕ) := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise PosNum.land <;> intros <;> (try cases_type* Bool) <;> rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_ldiff : ∀ m n : Num, (ldiff m n : ℕ) = Nat.ldiff m n := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise PosNum.ldiff <;> intros <;> (try cases_type* Bool) <;> rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_xor : ∀ m n : Num, ↑(m ^^^ n) = (↑m ^^^ ↑n : ℕ) := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise PosNum.lxor <;> intros <;> (try cases_type* Bool) <;> rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_shiftLeft (m : Num) (n : Nat) : ↑(m <<< n) = (m : ℕ) <<< (n : ℕ) := by
cases m <;> dsimp only [← shiftl_eq_shiftLeft, shiftl]
· symm
apply Nat.zero_shiftLeft
simp only [cast_pos]
induction' n with n IH
· rfl
simp [PosNum.shiftl_succ_eq_bit0_shiftl, Nat.shiftLeft_succ, IH, pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm,
-shiftl_eq_shiftLeft, -PosNum.shiftl_eq_shiftLeft, shiftl, mul_two]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_shiftRight (m : Num) (n : Nat) : ↑(m >>> n) = (m : ℕ) >>> (n : ℕ) := by
obtain - | m := m <;> dsimp only [← shiftr_eq_shiftRight, shiftr]
· symm
apply Nat.zero_shiftRight
induction' n with n IH generalizing m
· cases m <;> rfl
have hdiv2 : ∀ m, Nat.div2 (m + m) = m := by intro; rw [Nat.div2_val]; omega
obtain - | m | m := m <;> dsimp only [PosNum.shiftr, ← PosNum.shiftr_eq_shiftRight]
· rw [Nat.shiftRight_eq_div_pow]
symm
apply Nat.div_eq_of_lt
simp
· trans
· apply IH
change Nat.shiftRight m n = Nat.shiftRight (m + m + 1) (n + 1)
rw [add_comm n 1, @Nat.shiftRight_eq _ (1 + n), Nat.shiftRight_add]
apply congr_arg fun x => Nat.shiftRight x n
simp [-add_assoc, Nat.shiftRight_succ, Nat.shiftRight_zero, ← Nat.div2_val, hdiv2]
· trans
· apply IH
change Nat.shiftRight m n = Nat.shiftRight (m + m) (n + 1)
rw [add_comm n 1, @Nat.shiftRight_eq _ (1 + n), Nat.shiftRight_add]
apply congr_arg fun x => Nat.shiftRight x n
simp [-add_assoc, Nat.shiftRight_succ, Nat.shiftRight_zero, ← Nat.div2_val, hdiv2]
@[simp]
theorem castNum_testBit (m n) : testBit m n = Nat.testBit m n := by
cases m with dsimp only [testBit]
| zero =>
rw [show (Num.zero : Nat) = 0 from rfl, Nat.zero_testBit]
| pos m =>
rw [cast_pos]
induction' n with n IH generalizing m <;> obtain - | m | m := m
<;> simp only [PosNum.testBit]
· rfl
· rw [PosNum.cast_bit1, ← two_mul, ← congr_fun Nat.bit_true, Nat.testBit_bit_zero]
· rw [PosNum.cast_bit0, ← two_mul, ← congr_fun Nat.bit_false, Nat.testBit_bit_zero]
· simp [Nat.testBit_add_one]
· rw [PosNum.cast_bit1, ← two_mul, ← congr_fun Nat.bit_true, Nat.testBit_bit_succ, IH]
· rw [PosNum.cast_bit0, ← two_mul, ← congr_fun Nat.bit_false, Nat.testBit_bit_succ, IH]
end Num
namespace Int
/-- Cast a `SNum` to the corresponding integer. -/
def ofSnum : SNum → ℤ :=
SNum.rec' (fun a => cond a (-1) 0) fun a _p IH => cond a (2 * IH + 1) (2 * IH)
instance snumCoe : Coe SNum ℤ :=
⟨ofSnum⟩
end Int
instance SNum.lt : LT SNum :=
⟨fun a b => (a : ℤ) < b⟩
instance SNum.le : LE SNum :=
⟨fun a b => (a : ℤ) ≤ b⟩
| Mathlib/Data/Num/Lemmas.lean | 1,161 | 1,186 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Side
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Oriented.Rotation
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Affine
/-!
# Oriented angles.
This file defines oriented angles in Euclidean affine spaces.
## Main definitions
* `EuclideanGeometry.oangle`, with notation `∡`, is the oriented angle determined by three
points.
-/
noncomputable section
open Module Complex
open scoped Affine EuclideanGeometry Real RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
namespace EuclideanGeometry
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P] [hd2 : Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Module.Oriented ℝ V (Fin 2)]
/-- A fixed choice of positive orientation of Euclidean space `ℝ²` -/
abbrev o := @Module.Oriented.positiveOrientation
/-- The oriented angle at `p₂` between the line segments to `p₁` and `p₃`, modulo `2 * π`. If
either of those points equals `p₂`, this is 0. See `EuclideanGeometry.angle` for the
corresponding unoriented angle definition. -/
def oangle (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : Real.Angle :=
o.oangle (p₁ -ᵥ p₂) (p₃ -ᵥ p₂)
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "∡" => EuclideanGeometry.oangle
/-- Oriented angles are continuous when neither end point equals the middle point. -/
theorem continuousAt_oangle {x : P × P × P} (hx12 : x.1 ≠ x.2.1) (hx32 : x.2.2 ≠ x.2.1) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : P × P × P => ∡ y.1 y.2.1 y.2.2) x := by
unfold oangle
fun_prop (disch := simp [*])
/-- The angle ∡AAB at a point. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self_left (p₁ p₂ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₁ p₂ = 0 := by simp [oangle]
/-- The angle ∡ABB at a point. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self_right (p₁ p₂ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₂ = 0 := by simp [oangle]
/-- The angle ∡ABA at a point. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self_left_right (p₁ p₂ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₁ = 0 :=
o.oangle_self _
/-- If the angle between three points is nonzero, the first two points are not equal. -/
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0) : p₁ ≠ p₂ := by
rw [← @vsub_ne_zero V]; exact o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero h
/-- If the angle between three points is nonzero, the last two points are not equal. -/
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0) : p₃ ≠ p₂ := by
rw [← @vsub_ne_zero V]; exact o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero h
/-- If the angle between three points is nonzero, the first and third points are not equal. -/
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0) : p₁ ≠ p₃ := by
rw [← (vsub_left_injective p₂).ne_iff]; exact o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero h
/-- If the angle between three points is `π`, the first two points are not equal. -/
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between three points is `π`, the last two points are not equal. -/
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between three points is `π`, the first and third points are not equal. -/
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) : p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between three points is `π / 2`, the first two points are not equal. -/
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between three points is `π / 2`, the last two points are not equal. -/
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between three points is `π / 2`, the first and third points are not equal. -/
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (π / 2 : ℝ)) :
p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between three points is `-π / 2`, the first two points are not equal. -/
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between three points is `-π / 2`, the last two points are not equal. -/
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between three points is `-π / 2`, the first and third points are not equal. -/
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is nonzero, the first two points are not
equal. -/
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is nonzero, the last two points are not
equal. -/
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is nonzero, the first and third points are not
equal. -/
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0) : p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is positive, the first two points are not
equal. -/
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 1) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is positive, the last two points are not
equal. -/
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 1) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is positive, the first and third points are not
equal. -/
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 1) : p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is negative, the first two points are not
equal. -/
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = -1) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is negative, the last two points are not equal.
-/
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = -1) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is negative, the first and third points are not
equal. -/
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = -1) :
p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
/-- Reversing the order of the points passed to `oangle` negates the angle. -/
theorem oangle_rev (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = -∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
o.oangle_rev _ _
/-- Adding an angle to that with the order of the points reversed results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ + ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = 0 :=
o.oangle_add_oangle_rev _ _
/-- An oriented angle is zero if and only if the angle with the order of the points reversed is
zero. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = 0 ↔ ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = 0 :=
o.oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero
/-- An oriented angle is `π` if and only if the angle with the order of the points reversed is
`π`. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π ↔ ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = π :=
o.oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi
/-- An oriented angle is not zero or `π` if and only if the three points are affinely
| independent. -/
theorem oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_affineIndependent {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/Affine.lean | 182 | 183 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Aurélien Saue, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Inv
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Pow
import Mathlib.Util.AtomM
/-!
# `ring` tactic
A tactic for solving equations in commutative (semi)rings,
where the exponents can also contain variables.
Based on <http://www.cs.ru.nl/~freek/courses/tt-2014/read/10.1.1.61.3041.pdf> .
More precisely, expressions of the following form are supported:
- constants (non-negative integers)
- variables
- coefficients (any rational number, embedded into the (semi)ring)
- addition of expressions
- multiplication of expressions (`a * b`)
- scalar multiplication of expressions (`n • a`; the multiplier must have type `ℕ`)
- exponentiation of expressions (the exponent must have type `ℕ`)
- subtraction and negation of expressions (if the base is a full ring)
The extension to exponents means that something like `2 * 2^n * b = b * 2^(n+1)` can be proved,
even though it is not strictly speaking an equation in the language of commutative rings.
## Implementation notes
The basic approach to prove equalities is to normalise both sides and check for equality.
The normalisation is guided by building a value in the type `ExSum` at the meta level,
together with a proof (at the base level) that the original value is equal to
the normalised version.
The outline of the file:
- Define a mutual inductive family of types `ExSum`, `ExProd`, `ExBase`,
which can represent expressions with `+`, `*`, `^` and rational numerals.
The mutual induction ensures that associativity and distributivity are applied,
by restricting which kinds of subexpressions appear as arguments to the various operators.
- Represent addition, multiplication and exponentiation in the `ExSum` type,
thus allowing us to map expressions to `ExSum` (the `eval` function drives this).
We apply associativity and distributivity of the operators here (helped by `Ex*` types)
and commutativity as well (by sorting the subterms; unfortunately not helped by anything).
Any expression not of the above formats is treated as an atom (the same as a variable).
There are some details we glossed over which make the plan more complicated:
- The order on atoms is not initially obvious.
We construct a list containing them in order of initial appearance in the expression,
then use the index into the list as a key to order on.
- For `pow`, the exponent must be a natural number, while the base can be any semiring `α`.
We swap out operations for the base ring `α` with those for the exponent ring `ℕ`
as soon as we deal with exponents.
## Caveats and future work
The normalized form of an expression is the one that is useful for the tactic,
but not as nice to read. To remedy this, the user-facing normalization calls `ringNFCore`.
Subtraction cancels out identical terms, but division does not.
That is: `a - a = 0 := by ring` solves the goal,
but `a / a := 1 by ring` doesn't.
Note that `0 / 0` is generally defined to be `0`,
so division cancelling out is not true in general.
Multiplication of powers can be simplified a little bit further:
`2 ^ n * 2 ^ n = 4 ^ n := by ring` could be implemented
in a similar way that `2 * a + 2 * a = 4 * a := by ring` already works.
This feature wasn't needed yet, so it's not implemented yet.
## Tags
ring, semiring, exponent, power
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedAddCommMonoid
namespace Mathlib.Tactic
namespace Ring
open Mathlib.Meta Qq NormNum Lean.Meta AtomM
attribute [local instance] monadLiftOptionMetaM
open Lean (MetaM Expr mkRawNatLit)
/-- A shortcut instance for `CommSemiring ℕ` used by ring. -/
def instCommSemiringNat : CommSemiring ℕ := inferInstance
/--
A typed expression of type `CommSemiring ℕ` used when we are working on
ring subexpressions of type `ℕ`.
-/
def sℕ : Q(CommSemiring ℕ) := q(instCommSemiringNat)
mutual
/-- The base `e` of a normalized exponent expression. -/
inductive ExBase : ∀ {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)}, Q(CommSemiring $α) → (e : Q($α)) → Type
/--
An atomic expression `e` with id `id`.
Atomic expressions are those which `ring` cannot parse any further.
For instance, `a + (a % b)` has `a` and `(a % b)` as atoms.
The `ring1` tactic does not normalize the subexpressions in atoms, but `ring_nf` does.
Atoms in fact represent equivalence classes of expressions, modulo definitional equality.
The field `index : ℕ` should be a unique number for each class,
while `value : expr` contains a representative of this class.
The function `resolve_atom` determines the appropriate atom for a given expression.
-/
| atom {sα} {e} (id : ℕ) : ExBase sα e
/-- A sum of monomials. -/
| sum {sα} {e} (_ : ExSum sα e) : ExBase sα e
/--
A monomial, which is a product of powers of `ExBase` expressions,
terminated by a (nonzero) constant coefficient.
-/
inductive ExProd : ∀ {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)}, Q(CommSemiring $α) → (e : Q($α)) → Type
/-- A coefficient `value`, which must not be `0`. `e` is a raw rat cast.
If `value` is not an integer, then `hyp` should be a proof of `(value.den : α) ≠ 0`. -/
| const {sα} {e} (value : ℚ) (hyp : Option Expr := none) : ExProd sα e
/-- A product `x ^ e * b` is a monomial if `b` is a monomial. Here `x` is an `ExBase`
and `e` is an `ExProd` representing a monomial expression in `ℕ` (it is a monomial instead of
a polynomial because we eagerly normalize `x ^ (a + b) = x ^ a * x ^ b`.) -/
| mul {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα} {x : Q($α)} {e : Q(ℕ)} {b : Q($α)} :
ExBase sα x → ExProd sℕ e → ExProd sα b → ExProd sα q($x ^ $e * $b)
/-- A polynomial expression, which is a sum of monomials. -/
inductive ExSum : ∀ {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)}, Q(CommSemiring $α) → (e : Q($α)) → Type
/-- Zero is a polynomial. `e` is the expression `0`. -/
| zero {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} : ExSum sα q(0 : $α)
/-- A sum `a + b` is a polynomial if `a` is a monomial and `b` is another polynomial. -/
| add {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExProd sα a → ExSum sα b → ExSum sα q($a + $b)
end
mutual -- partial only to speed up compilation
/-- Equality test for expressions. This is not a `BEq` instance because it is heterogeneous. -/
partial def ExBase.eq
{u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExBase sα a → ExBase sα b → Bool
| .atom i, .atom j => i == j
| .sum a, .sum b => a.eq b
| _, _ => false
@[inherit_doc ExBase.eq]
partial def ExProd.eq
{u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExProd sα a → ExProd sα b → Bool
| .const i _, .const j _ => i == j
| .mul a₁ a₂ a₃, .mul b₁ b₂ b₃ => a₁.eq b₁ && a₂.eq b₂ && a₃.eq b₃
| _, _ => false
@[inherit_doc ExBase.eq]
partial def ExSum.eq
{u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExSum sα a → ExSum sα b → Bool
| .zero, .zero => true
| .add a₁ a₂, .add b₁ b₂ => a₁.eq b₁ && a₂.eq b₂
| _, _ => false
end
mutual -- partial only to speed up compilation
/--
A total order on normalized expressions.
This is not an `Ord` instance because it is heterogeneous.
-/
partial def ExBase.cmp
{u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExBase sα a → ExBase sα b → Ordering
| .atom i, .atom j => compare i j
| .sum a, .sum b => a.cmp b
| .atom .., .sum .. => .lt
| .sum .., .atom .. => .gt
@[inherit_doc ExBase.cmp]
partial def ExProd.cmp
{u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExProd sα a → ExProd sα b → Ordering
| .const i _, .const j _ => compare i j
| .mul a₁ a₂ a₃, .mul b₁ b₂ b₃ => (a₁.cmp b₁).then (a₂.cmp b₂) |>.then (a₃.cmp b₃)
| .const _ _, .mul .. => .lt
| .mul .., .const _ _ => .gt
@[inherit_doc ExBase.cmp]
partial def ExSum.cmp
{u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExSum sα a → ExSum sα b → Ordering
| .zero, .zero => .eq
| .add a₁ a₂, .add b₁ b₂ => (a₁.cmp b₁).then (a₂.cmp b₂)
| .zero, .add .. => .lt
| .add .., .zero => .gt
end
variable {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)}
instance : Inhabited (Σ e, (ExBase sα) e) := ⟨default, .atom 0⟩
instance : Inhabited (Σ e, (ExSum sα) e) := ⟨_, .zero⟩
instance : Inhabited (Σ e, (ExProd sα) e) := ⟨default, .const 0 none⟩
mutual
/-- Converts `ExBase sα` to `ExBase sβ`, assuming `sα` and `sβ` are defeq. -/
partial def ExBase.cast
{v : Lean.Level} {β : Q(Type v)} {sβ : Q(CommSemiring $β)} {a : Q($α)} :
ExBase sα a → Σ a, ExBase sβ a
| .atom i => ⟨a, .atom i⟩
| .sum a => let ⟨_, vb⟩ := a.cast; ⟨_, .sum vb⟩
/-- Converts `ExProd sα` to `ExProd sβ`, assuming `sα` and `sβ` are defeq. -/
partial def ExProd.cast
{v : Lean.Level} {β : Q(Type v)} {sβ : Q(CommSemiring $β)} {a : Q($α)} :
ExProd sα a → Σ a, ExProd sβ a
| .const i h => ⟨a, .const i h⟩
| .mul a₁ a₂ a₃ => ⟨_, .mul a₁.cast.2 a₂ a₃.cast.2⟩
/-- Converts `ExSum sα` to `ExSum sβ`, assuming `sα` and `sβ` are defeq. -/
partial def ExSum.cast
{v : Lean.Level} {β : Q(Type v)} {sβ : Q(CommSemiring $β)} {a : Q($α)} :
ExSum sα a → Σ a, ExSum sβ a
| .zero => ⟨_, .zero⟩
| .add a₁ a₂ => ⟨_, .add a₁.cast.2 a₂.cast.2⟩
end
variable {u : Lean.Level}
/--
The result of evaluating an (unnormalized) expression `e` into the type family `E`
(one of `ExSum`, `ExProd`, `ExBase`) is a (normalized) element `e'`
and a representation `E e'` for it, and a proof of `e = e'`.
-/
structure Result {α : Q(Type u)} (E : Q($α) → Type) (e : Q($α)) where
/-- The normalized result. -/
expr : Q($α)
/-- The data associated to the normalization. -/
val : E expr
/-- A proof that the original expression is equal to the normalized result. -/
proof : Q($e = $expr)
instance {α : Q(Type u)} {E : Q($α) → Type} {e : Q($α)} [Inhabited (Σ e, E e)] :
Inhabited (Result E e) :=
let ⟨e', v⟩ : Σ e, E e := default; ⟨e', v, default⟩
variable {α : Q(Type u)} (sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)) {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
/--
Constructs the expression corresponding to `.const n`.
(The `.const` constructor does not check that the expression is correct.)
-/
def ExProd.mkNat (n : ℕ) : (e : Q($α)) × ExProd sα e :=
let lit : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit n
⟨q(($lit).rawCast : $α), .const n none⟩
/--
Constructs the expression corresponding to `.const (-n)`.
(The `.const` constructor does not check that the expression is correct.)
-/
def ExProd.mkNegNat (_ : Q(Ring $α)) (n : ℕ) : (e : Q($α)) × ExProd sα e :=
let lit : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit n
⟨q((Int.negOfNat $lit).rawCast : $α), .const (-n) none⟩
/--
Constructs the expression corresponding to `.const q h` for `q = n / d`
and `h` a proof that `(d : α) ≠ 0`.
(The `.const` constructor does not check that the expression is correct.)
-/
def ExProd.mkRat (_ : Q(DivisionRing $α)) (q : ℚ) (n : Q(ℤ)) (d : Q(ℕ)) (h : Expr) :
(e : Q($α)) × ExProd sα e :=
⟨q(Rat.rawCast $n $d : $α), .const q h⟩
section
/-- Embed an exponent (an `ExBase, ExProd` pair) as an `ExProd` by multiplying by 1. -/
def ExBase.toProd {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a : Q($α)} {b : Q(ℕ)}
(va : ExBase sα a) (vb : ExProd sℕ b) :
ExProd sα q($a ^ $b * (nat_lit 1).rawCast) := .mul va vb (.const 1 none)
/-- Embed `ExProd` in `ExSum` by adding 0. -/
def ExProd.toSum {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {e : Q($α)} (v : ExProd sα e) : ExSum sα q($e + 0) :=
.add v .zero
/-- Get the leading coefficient of an `ExProd`. -/
def ExProd.coeff {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {e : Q($α)} : ExProd sα e → ℚ
| .const q _ => q
| .mul _ _ v => v.coeff
end
/--
Two monomials are said to "overlap" if they differ by a constant factor, in which case the
constants just add. When this happens, the constant may be either zero (if the monomials cancel)
or nonzero (if they add up); the zero case is handled specially.
-/
inductive Overlap (e : Q($α)) where
/-- The expression `e` (the sum of monomials) is equal to `0`. -/
| zero (_ : Q(IsNat $e (nat_lit 0)))
/-- The expression `e` (the sum of monomials) is equal to another monomial
(with nonzero leading coefficient). -/
| nonzero (_ : Result (ExProd sα) e)
variable {a a' a₁ a₂ a₃ b b' b₁ b₂ b₃ c c₁ c₂ : R}
theorem add_overlap_pf (x : R) (e) (pq_pf : a + b = c) :
x ^ e * a + x ^ e * b = x ^ e * c := by subst_vars; simp [mul_add]
theorem add_overlap_pf_zero (x : R) (e) :
IsNat (a + b) (nat_lit 0) → IsNat (x ^ e * a + x ^ e * b) (nat_lit 0)
| ⟨h⟩ => ⟨by simp [h, ← mul_add]⟩
-- TODO: decide if this is a good idea globally in
-- https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/270676-lean4/topic/.60MonadLift.20Option.20.28OptionT.20m.29.60/near/469097834
private local instance {m} [Pure m] : MonadLift Option (OptionT m) where
monadLift f := .mk <| pure f
/--
Given monomials `va, vb`, attempts to add them together to get another monomial.
If the monomials are not compatible, returns `none`.
For example, `xy + 2xy = 3xy` is a `.nonzero` overlap, while `xy + xz` returns `none`
and `xy + -xy = 0` is a `.zero` overlap.
-/
def evalAddOverlap {a b : Q($α)} (va : ExProd sα a) (vb : ExProd sα b) :
OptionT Lean.Core.CoreM (Overlap sα q($a + $b)) := do
Lean.Core.checkSystem decl_name%.toString
match va, vb with
| .const za ha, .const zb hb => do
let ra := Result.ofRawRat za a ha; let rb := Result.ofRawRat zb b hb
let res ← NormNum.evalAdd.core q($a + $b) q(HAdd.hAdd) a b ra rb
match res with
| .isNat _ (.lit (.natVal 0)) p => pure <| .zero p
| rc =>
let ⟨zc, hc⟩ ← rc.toRatNZ
let ⟨c, pc⟩ := rc.toRawEq
pure <| .nonzero ⟨c, .const zc hc, pc⟩
| .mul (x := a₁) (e := a₂) va₁ va₂ va₃, .mul vb₁ vb₂ vb₃ => do
guard (va₁.eq vb₁ && va₂.eq vb₂)
match ← evalAddOverlap va₃ vb₃ with
| .zero p => pure <| .zero (q(add_overlap_pf_zero $a₁ $a₂ $p) : Expr)
| .nonzero ⟨_, vc, p⟩ =>
pure <| .nonzero ⟨_, .mul va₁ va₂ vc, (q(add_overlap_pf $a₁ $a₂ $p) : Expr)⟩
| _, _ => OptionT.fail
theorem add_pf_zero_add (b : R) : 0 + b = b := by simp
theorem add_pf_add_zero (a : R) : a + 0 = a := by simp
theorem add_pf_add_overlap
(_ : a₁ + b₁ = c₁) (_ : a₂ + b₂ = c₂) : (a₁ + a₂ : R) + (b₁ + b₂) = c₁ + c₂ := by
subst_vars; simp [add_assoc, add_left_comm]
theorem add_pf_add_overlap_zero
(h : IsNat (a₁ + b₁) (nat_lit 0)) (h₄ : a₂ + b₂ = c) : (a₁ + a₂ : R) + (b₁ + b₂) = c := by
subst_vars; rw [add_add_add_comm, h.1, Nat.cast_zero, add_pf_zero_add]
theorem add_pf_add_lt (a₁ : R) (_ : a₂ + b = c) : (a₁ + a₂) + b = a₁ + c := by simp [*, add_assoc]
theorem add_pf_add_gt (b₁ : R) (_ : a + b₂ = c) : a + (b₁ + b₂) = b₁ + c := by
subst_vars; simp [add_left_comm]
/-- Adds two polynomials `va, vb` together to get a normalized result polynomial.
* `0 + b = b`
* `a + 0 = a`
* `a * x + a * y = a * (x + y)` (for `x`, `y` coefficients; uses `evalAddOverlap`)
* `(a₁ + a₂) + (b₁ + b₂) = a₁ + (a₂ + (b₁ + b₂))` (if `a₁.lt b₁`)
* `(a₁ + a₂) + (b₁ + b₂) = b₁ + ((a₁ + a₂) + b₂)` (if not `a₁.lt b₁`)
-/
partial def evalAdd {a b : Q($α)} (va : ExSum sα a) (vb : ExSum sα b) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExSum sα) q($a + $b) := do
Lean.Core.checkSystem decl_name%.toString
match va, vb with
| .zero, vb => return ⟨b, vb, q(add_pf_zero_add $b)⟩
| va, .zero => return ⟨a, va, q(add_pf_add_zero $a)⟩
| .add (a := a₁) (b := _a₂) va₁ va₂, .add (a := b₁) (b := _b₂) vb₁ vb₂ =>
match ← (evalAddOverlap sα va₁ vb₁).run with
| some (.nonzero ⟨_, vc₁, pc₁⟩) =>
let ⟨_, vc₂, pc₂⟩ ← evalAdd va₂ vb₂
return ⟨_, .add vc₁ vc₂, q(add_pf_add_overlap $pc₁ $pc₂)⟩
| some (.zero pc₁) =>
let ⟨c₂, vc₂, pc₂⟩ ← evalAdd va₂ vb₂
return ⟨c₂, vc₂, q(add_pf_add_overlap_zero $pc₁ $pc₂)⟩
| none =>
if let .lt := va₁.cmp vb₁ then
let ⟨_c, vc, (pc : Q($_a₂ + ($b₁ + $_b₂) = $_c))⟩ ← evalAdd va₂ vb
return ⟨_, .add va₁ vc, q(add_pf_add_lt $a₁ $pc)⟩
else
let ⟨_c, vc, (pc : Q($a₁ + $_a₂ + $_b₂ = $_c))⟩ ← evalAdd va vb₂
return ⟨_, .add vb₁ vc, q(add_pf_add_gt $b₁ $pc)⟩
theorem one_mul (a : R) : (nat_lit 1).rawCast * a = a := by simp [Nat.rawCast]
theorem mul_one (a : R) : a * (nat_lit 1).rawCast = a := by simp [Nat.rawCast]
theorem mul_pf_left (a₁ : R) (a₂) (_ : a₃ * b = c) :
(a₁ ^ a₂ * a₃ : R) * b = a₁ ^ a₂ * c := by
subst_vars; rw [mul_assoc]
theorem mul_pf_right (b₁ : R) (b₂) (_ : a * b₃ = c) :
a * (b₁ ^ b₂ * b₃) = b₁ ^ b₂ * c := by
subst_vars; rw [mul_left_comm]
theorem mul_pp_pf_overlap {ea eb e : ℕ} (x : R) (_ : ea + eb = e) (_ : a₂ * b₂ = c) :
(x ^ ea * a₂ : R) * (x ^ eb * b₂) = x ^ e * c := by
subst_vars; simp [pow_add, mul_mul_mul_comm]
/-- Multiplies two monomials `va, vb` together to get a normalized result monomial.
* `x * y = (x * y)` (for `x`, `y` coefficients)
* `x * (b₁ * b₂) = b₁ * (b₂ * x)` (for `x` coefficient)
* `(a₁ * a₂) * y = a₁ * (a₂ * y)` (for `y` coefficient)
* `(x ^ ea * a₂) * (x ^ eb * b₂) = x ^ (ea + eb) * (a₂ * b₂)`
(if `ea` and `eb` are identical except coefficient)
* `(a₁ * a₂) * (b₁ * b₂) = a₁ * (a₂ * (b₁ * b₂))` (if `a₁.lt b₁`)
* `(a₁ * a₂) * (b₁ * b₂) = b₁ * ((a₁ * a₂) * b₂)` (if not `a₁.lt b₁`)
-/
partial def evalMulProd {a b : Q($α)} (va : ExProd sα a) (vb : ExProd sα b) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExProd sα) q($a * $b) := do
Lean.Core.checkSystem decl_name%.toString
match va, vb with
| .const za ha, .const zb hb =>
if za = 1 then
return ⟨b, .const zb hb, (q(one_mul $b) : Expr)⟩
else if zb = 1 then
return ⟨a, .const za ha, (q(mul_one $a) : Expr)⟩
else
let ra := Result.ofRawRat za a ha; let rb := Result.ofRawRat zb b hb
let rc := (NormNum.evalMul.core q($a * $b) q(HMul.hMul) _ _
q(CommSemiring.toSemiring) ra rb).get!
let ⟨zc, hc⟩ := rc.toRatNZ.get!
let ⟨c, pc⟩ := rc.toRawEq
return ⟨c, .const zc hc, pc⟩
| .mul (x := a₁) (e := a₂) va₁ va₂ va₃, .const _ _ =>
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalMulProd va₃ vb
return ⟨_, .mul va₁ va₂ vc, (q(mul_pf_left $a₁ $a₂ $pc) : Expr)⟩
| .const _ _, .mul (x := b₁) (e := b₂) vb₁ vb₂ vb₃ =>
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalMulProd va vb₃
return ⟨_, .mul vb₁ vb₂ vc, (q(mul_pf_right $b₁ $b₂ $pc) : Expr)⟩
| .mul (x := xa) (e := ea) vxa vea va₂, .mul (x := xb) (e := eb) vxb veb vb₂ => do
if vxa.eq vxb then
if let some (.nonzero ⟨_, ve, pe⟩) ← (evalAddOverlap sℕ vea veb).run then
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalMulProd va₂ vb₂
return ⟨_, .mul vxa ve vc, (q(mul_pp_pf_overlap $xa $pe $pc) : Expr)⟩
if let .lt := (vxa.cmp vxb).then (vea.cmp veb) then
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalMulProd va₂ vb
return ⟨_, .mul vxa vea vc, (q(mul_pf_left $xa $ea $pc) : Expr)⟩
else
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalMulProd va vb₂
return ⟨_, .mul vxb veb vc, (q(mul_pf_right $xb $eb $pc) : Expr)⟩
theorem mul_zero (a : R) : a * 0 = 0 := by simp
theorem mul_add {d : R} (_ : (a : R) * b₁ = c₁) (_ : a * b₂ = c₂) (_ : c₁ + 0 + c₂ = d) :
a * (b₁ + b₂) = d := by
subst_vars; simp [_root_.mul_add]
/-- Multiplies a monomial `va` to a polynomial `vb` to get a normalized result polynomial.
* `a * 0 = 0`
* `a * (b₁ + b₂) = (a * b₁) + (a * b₂)`
-/
def evalMul₁ {a b : Q($α)} (va : ExProd sα a) (vb : ExSum sα b) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExSum sα) q($a * $b) := do
match vb with
| .zero => return ⟨_, .zero, q(mul_zero $a)⟩
| .add vb₁ vb₂ =>
let ⟨_, vc₁, pc₁⟩ ← evalMulProd sα va vb₁
let ⟨_, vc₂, pc₂⟩ ← evalMul₁ va vb₂
let ⟨_, vd, pd⟩ ← evalAdd sα vc₁.toSum vc₂
return ⟨_, vd, q(mul_add $pc₁ $pc₂ $pd)⟩
theorem zero_mul (b : R) : 0 * b = 0 := by simp
theorem add_mul {d : R} (_ : (a₁ : R) * b = c₁) (_ : a₂ * b = c₂) (_ : c₁ + c₂ = d) :
(a₁ + a₂) * b = d := by subst_vars; simp [_root_.add_mul]
/-- Multiplies two polynomials `va, vb` together to get a normalized result polynomial.
* `0 * b = 0`
* `(a₁ + a₂) * b = (a₁ * b) + (a₂ * b)`
-/
def evalMul {a b : Q($α)} (va : ExSum sα a) (vb : ExSum sα b) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExSum sα) q($a * $b) := do
match va with
| .zero => return ⟨_, .zero, q(zero_mul $b)⟩
| .add va₁ va₂ =>
let ⟨_, vc₁, pc₁⟩ ← evalMul₁ sα va₁ vb
let ⟨_, vc₂, pc₂⟩ ← evalMul va₂ vb
let ⟨_, vd, pd⟩ ← evalAdd sα vc₁ vc₂
return ⟨_, vd, q(add_mul $pc₁ $pc₂ $pd)⟩
theorem natCast_nat (n) : ((Nat.rawCast n : ℕ) : R) = Nat.rawCast n := by simp
theorem natCast_mul {a₁ a₃ : ℕ} (a₂) (_ : ((a₁ : ℕ) : R) = b₁)
(_ : ((a₃ : ℕ) : R) = b₃) : ((a₁ ^ a₂ * a₃ : ℕ) : R) = b₁ ^ a₂ * b₃ := by
subst_vars; simp
theorem natCast_zero : ((0 : ℕ) : R) = 0 := Nat.cast_zero
theorem natCast_add {a₁ a₂ : ℕ}
(_ : ((a₁ : ℕ) : R) = b₁) (_ : ((a₂ : ℕ) : R) = b₂) : ((a₁ + a₂ : ℕ) : R) = b₁ + b₂ := by
subst_vars; simp
mutual
/-- Applies `Nat.cast` to a nat polynomial to produce a polynomial in `α`.
* An atom `e` causes `↑e` to be allocated as a new atom.
* A sum delegates to `ExSum.evalNatCast`.
-/
partial def ExBase.evalNatCast {a : Q(ℕ)} (va : ExBase sℕ a) : AtomM (Result (ExBase sα) q($a)) :=
match va with
| .atom _ => do
let (i, ⟨b', _⟩) ← addAtomQ q($a)
pure ⟨b', ExBase.atom i, q(Eq.refl $b')⟩
| .sum va => do
let ⟨_, vc, p⟩ ← va.evalNatCast
pure ⟨_, .sum vc, p⟩
/-- Applies `Nat.cast` to a nat monomial to produce a monomial in `α`.
* `↑c = c` if `c` is a numeric literal
* `↑(a ^ n * b) = ↑a ^ n * ↑b`
-/
partial def ExProd.evalNatCast {a : Q(ℕ)} (va : ExProd sℕ a) : AtomM (Result (ExProd sα) q($a)) :=
match va with
| .const c hc =>
have n : Q(ℕ) := a.appArg!
pure ⟨q(Nat.rawCast $n), .const c hc, (q(natCast_nat (R := $α) $n) : Expr)⟩
| .mul (e := a₂) va₁ va₂ va₃ => do
let ⟨_, vb₁, pb₁⟩ ← va₁.evalNatCast
let ⟨_, vb₃, pb₃⟩ ← va₃.evalNatCast
pure ⟨_, .mul vb₁ va₂ vb₃, q(natCast_mul $a₂ $pb₁ $pb₃)⟩
/-- Applies `Nat.cast` to a nat polynomial to produce a polynomial in `α`.
* `↑0 = 0`
* `↑(a + b) = ↑a + ↑b`
-/
partial def ExSum.evalNatCast {a : Q(ℕ)} (va : ExSum sℕ a) : AtomM (Result (ExSum sα) q($a)) :=
match va with
| .zero => pure ⟨_, .zero, q(natCast_zero (R := $α))⟩
| .add va₁ va₂ => do
let ⟨_, vb₁, pb₁⟩ ← va₁.evalNatCast
let ⟨_, vb₂, pb₂⟩ ← va₂.evalNatCast
pure ⟨_, .add vb₁ vb₂, q(natCast_add $pb₁ $pb₂)⟩
end
theorem smul_nat {a b c : ℕ} (_ : (a * b : ℕ) = c) : a • b = c := by subst_vars; simp
theorem smul_eq_cast {a : ℕ} (_ : ((a : ℕ) : R) = a') (_ : a' * b = c) : a • b = c := by
subst_vars; simp
/-- Constructs the scalar multiplication `n • a`, where both `n : ℕ` and `a : α` are normalized
polynomial expressions.
* `a • b = a * b` if `α = ℕ`
* `a • b = ↑a * b` otherwise
-/
def evalNSMul {a : Q(ℕ)} {b : Q($α)} (va : ExSum sℕ a) (vb : ExSum sα b) :
AtomM (Result (ExSum sα) q($a • $b)) := do
if ← isDefEq sα sℕ then
let ⟨_, va'⟩ := va.cast
have _b : Q(ℕ) := b
let ⟨(_c : Q(ℕ)), vc, (pc : Q($a * $_b = $_c))⟩ ← evalMul sα va' vb
pure ⟨_, vc, (q(smul_nat $pc) : Expr)⟩
else
let ⟨_, va', pa'⟩ ← va.evalNatCast sα
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalMul sα va' vb
pure ⟨_, vc, (q(smul_eq_cast $pa' $pc) : Expr)⟩
theorem neg_one_mul {R} [Ring R] {a b : R} (_ : (Int.negOfNat (nat_lit 1)).rawCast * a = b) :
-a = b := by subst_vars; simp [Int.negOfNat]
theorem neg_mul {R} [Ring R] (a₁ : R) (a₂) {a₃ b : R}
(_ : -a₃ = b) : -(a₁ ^ a₂ * a₃) = a₁ ^ a₂ * b := by subst_vars; simp
/-- Negates a monomial `va` to get another monomial.
* `-c = (-c)` (for `c` coefficient)
* `-(a₁ * a₂) = a₁ * -a₂`
-/
def evalNegProd {a : Q($α)} (rα : Q(Ring $α)) (va : ExProd sα a) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExProd sα) q(-$a) := do
Lean.Core.checkSystem decl_name%.toString
match va with
| .const za ha =>
let lit : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit 1
let ⟨m1, _⟩ := ExProd.mkNegNat sα rα 1
let rm := Result.isNegNat rα lit (q(IsInt.of_raw $α (.negOfNat $lit)) : Expr)
let ra := Result.ofRawRat za a ha
let rb := (NormNum.evalMul.core q($m1 * $a) q(HMul.hMul) _ _
q(CommSemiring.toSemiring) rm ra).get!
let ⟨zb, hb⟩ := rb.toRatNZ.get!
let ⟨b, (pb : Q((Int.negOfNat (nat_lit 1)).rawCast * $a = $b))⟩ := rb.toRawEq
return ⟨b, .const zb hb, (q(neg_one_mul (R := $α) $pb) : Expr)⟩
| .mul (x := a₁) (e := a₂) va₁ va₂ va₃ =>
let ⟨_, vb, pb⟩ ← evalNegProd rα va₃
return ⟨_, .mul va₁ va₂ vb, (q(neg_mul $a₁ $a₂ $pb) : Expr)⟩
theorem neg_zero {R} [Ring R] : -(0 : R) = 0 := by simp
theorem neg_add {R} [Ring R] {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : R}
(_ : -a₁ = b₁) (_ : -a₂ = b₂) : -(a₁ + a₂) = b₁ + b₂ := by
subst_vars; simp [add_comm]
/-- Negates a polynomial `va` to get another polynomial.
* `-0 = 0` (for `c` coefficient)
* `-(a₁ + a₂) = -a₁ + -a₂`
-/
def evalNeg {a : Q($α)} (rα : Q(Ring $α)) (va : ExSum sα a) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExSum sα) q(-$a) := do
match va with
| .zero => return ⟨_, .zero, (q(neg_zero (R := $α)) : Expr)⟩
| .add va₁ va₂ =>
let ⟨_, vb₁, pb₁⟩ ← evalNegProd sα rα va₁
let ⟨_, vb₂, pb₂⟩ ← evalNeg rα va₂
return ⟨_, .add vb₁ vb₂, (q(neg_add $pb₁ $pb₂) : Expr)⟩
theorem sub_pf {R} [Ring R] {a b c d : R}
(_ : -b = c) (_ : a + c = d) : a - b = d := by subst_vars; simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
/-- Subtracts two polynomials `va, vb` to get a normalized result polynomial.
* `a - b = a + -b`
-/
def evalSub {α : Q(Type u)} (sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)) {a b : Q($α)}
(rα : Q(Ring $α)) (va : ExSum sα a) (vb : ExSum sα b) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExSum sα) q($a - $b) := do
let ⟨_c, vc, pc⟩ ← evalNeg sα rα vb
let ⟨d, vd, (pd : Q($a + $_c = $d))⟩ ← evalAdd sα va vc
return ⟨d, vd, (q(sub_pf $pc $pd) : Expr)⟩
theorem pow_prod_atom (a : R) (b) : a ^ b = (a + 0) ^ b * (nat_lit 1).rawCast := by simp
/--
The fallback case for exponentiating polynomials is to use `ExBase.toProd` to just build an
exponent expression. (This has a slightly different normalization than `evalPowAtom` because
the input types are different.)
* `x ^ e = (x + 0) ^ e * 1`
-/
def evalPowProdAtom {a : Q($α)} {b : Q(ℕ)} (va : ExProd sα a) (vb : ExProd sℕ b) :
Result (ExProd sα) q($a ^ $b) :=
⟨_, (ExBase.sum va.toSum).toProd vb, q(pow_prod_atom $a $b)⟩
theorem pow_atom (a : R) (b) : a ^ b = a ^ b * (nat_lit 1).rawCast + 0 := by simp
/--
The fallback case for exponentiating polynomials is to use `ExBase.toProd` to just build an
exponent expression.
* `x ^ e = x ^ e * 1 + 0`
-/
def evalPowAtom {a : Q($α)} {b : Q(ℕ)} (va : ExBase sα a) (vb : ExProd sℕ b) :
Result (ExSum sα) q($a ^ $b) :=
⟨_, (va.toProd vb).toSum, q(pow_atom $a $b)⟩
theorem const_pos (n : ℕ) (h : Nat.ble 1 n = true) : 0 < (n.rawCast : ℕ) := Nat.le_of_ble_eq_true h
theorem mul_exp_pos {a₁ a₂ : ℕ} (n) (h₁ : 0 < a₁) (h₂ : 0 < a₂) : 0 < a₁ ^ n * a₂ :=
Nat.mul_pos (Nat.pow_pos h₁) h₂
theorem add_pos_left {a₁ : ℕ} (a₂) (h : 0 < a₁) : 0 < a₁ + a₂ :=
Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h (Nat.le_add_right ..)
theorem add_pos_right {a₂ : ℕ} (a₁) (h : 0 < a₂) : 0 < a₁ + a₂ :=
Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h (Nat.le_add_left ..)
mutual
/-- Attempts to prove that a polynomial expression in `ℕ` is positive.
* Atoms are not (necessarily) positive
* Sums defer to `ExSum.evalPos`
-/
partial def ExBase.evalPos {a : Q(ℕ)} (va : ExBase sℕ a) : Option Q(0 < $a) :=
match va with
| .atom _ => none
| .sum va => va.evalPos
/-- Attempts to prove that a monomial expression in `ℕ` is positive.
* `0 < c` (where `c` is a numeral) is true by the normalization invariant (`c` is not zero)
* `0 < x ^ e * b` if `0 < x` and `0 < b`
-/
partial def ExProd.evalPos {a : Q(ℕ)} (va : ExProd sℕ a) : Option Q(0 < $a) :=
match va with
| .const _ _ =>
-- it must be positive because it is a nonzero nat literal
have lit : Q(ℕ) := a.appArg!
haveI : $a =Q Nat.rawCast $lit := ⟨⟩
haveI p : Nat.ble 1 $lit =Q true := ⟨⟩
some q(const_pos $lit $p)
| .mul (e := ea₁) vxa₁ _ va₂ => do
let pa₁ ← vxa₁.evalPos
let pa₂ ← va₂.evalPos
some q(mul_exp_pos $ea₁ $pa₁ $pa₂)
/-- Attempts to prove that a polynomial expression in `ℕ` is positive.
* `0 < 0` fails
* `0 < a + b` if `0 < a` or `0 < b`
-/
partial def ExSum.evalPos {a : Q(ℕ)} (va : ExSum sℕ a) : Option Q(0 < $a) :=
match va with
| .zero => none
| .add (a := a₁) (b := a₂) va₁ va₂ => do
match va₁.evalPos with
| some p => some q(add_pos_left $a₂ $p)
| none => let p ← va₂.evalPos; some q(add_pos_right $a₁ $p)
end
theorem pow_one (a : R) : a ^ nat_lit 1 = a := by simp
theorem pow_bit0 {k : ℕ} (_ : (a : R) ^ k = b) (_ : b * b = c) :
a ^ (Nat.mul (nat_lit 2) k) = c := by
subst_vars; simp [Nat.succ_mul, pow_add]
theorem pow_bit1 {k : ℕ} {d : R} (_ : (a : R) ^ k = b) (_ : b * b = c) (_ : c * a = d) :
a ^ (Nat.add (Nat.mul (nat_lit 2) k) (nat_lit 1)) = d := by
subst_vars; simp [Nat.succ_mul, pow_add]
/--
The main case of exponentiation of ring expressions is when `va` is a polynomial and `n` is a
nonzero literal expression, like `(x + y)^5`. In this case we work out the polynomial completely
into a sum of monomials.
* `x ^ 1 = x`
* `x ^ (2*n) = x ^ n * x ^ n`
* `x ^ (2*n+1) = x ^ n * x ^ n * x`
-/
partial def evalPowNat {a : Q($α)} (va : ExSum sα a) (n : Q(ℕ)) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExSum sα) q($a ^ $n) := do
let nn := n.natLit!
if nn = 1 then
return ⟨_, va, (q(pow_one $a) : Expr)⟩
else
let nm := nn >>> 1
have m : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit nm
if nn &&& 1 = 0 then
let ⟨_, vb, pb⟩ ← evalPowNat va m
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalMul sα vb vb
return ⟨_, vc, (q(pow_bit0 $pb $pc) : Expr)⟩
else
let ⟨_, vb, pb⟩ ← evalPowNat va m
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalMul sα vb vb
let ⟨_, vd, pd⟩ ← evalMul sα vc va
return ⟨_, vd, (q(pow_bit1 $pb $pc $pd) : Expr)⟩
theorem one_pow (b : ℕ) : ((nat_lit 1).rawCast : R) ^ b = (nat_lit 1).rawCast := by simp
theorem mul_pow {ea₁ b c₁ : ℕ} {xa₁ : R}
(_ : ea₁ * b = c₁) (_ : a₂ ^ b = c₂) : (xa₁ ^ ea₁ * a₂ : R) ^ b = xa₁ ^ c₁ * c₂ := by
subst_vars; simp [_root_.mul_pow, pow_mul]
/-- There are several special cases when exponentiating monomials:
* `1 ^ n = 1`
* `x ^ y = (x ^ y)` when `x` and `y` are constants
* `(a * b) ^ e = a ^ e * b ^ e`
In all other cases we use `evalPowProdAtom`.
-/
def evalPowProd {a : Q($α)} {b : Q(ℕ)} (va : ExProd sα a) (vb : ExProd sℕ b) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExProd sα) q($a ^ $b) := do
Lean.Core.checkSystem decl_name%.toString
let res : OptionT Lean.Core.CoreM (Result (ExProd sα) q($a ^ $b)) := do
match va, vb with
| .const 1, _ => return ⟨_, va, (q(one_pow (R := $α) $b) : Expr)⟩
| .const za ha, .const zb hb =>
assert! 0 ≤ zb
let ra := Result.ofRawRat za a ha
have lit : Q(ℕ) := b.appArg!
let rb := (q(IsNat.of_raw ℕ $lit) : Expr)
let rc ← NormNum.evalPow.core q($a ^ $b) q(HPow.hPow) q($a) q($b) lit rb
q(CommSemiring.toSemiring) ra
let ⟨zc, hc⟩ ← rc.toRatNZ
let ⟨c, pc⟩ := rc.toRawEq
return ⟨c, .const zc hc, pc⟩
| .mul vxa₁ vea₁ va₂, vb =>
let ⟨_, vc₁, pc₁⟩ ← evalMulProd sℕ vea₁ vb
let ⟨_, vc₂, pc₂⟩ ← evalPowProd va₂ vb
return ⟨_, .mul vxa₁ vc₁ vc₂, q(mul_pow $pc₁ $pc₂)⟩
| _, _ => OptionT.fail
return (← res.run).getD (evalPowProdAtom sα va vb)
/--
The result of `extractCoeff` is a numeral and a proof that the original expression
factors by this numeral.
-/
structure ExtractCoeff (e : Q(ℕ)) where
/-- A raw natural number literal. -/
k : Q(ℕ)
/-- The result of extracting the coefficient is a monic monomial. -/
e' : Q(ℕ)
/-- `e'` is a monomial. -/
ve' : ExProd sℕ e'
/-- The proof that `e` splits into the coefficient `k` and the monic monomial `e'`. -/
p : Q($e = $e' * $k)
theorem coeff_one (k : ℕ) : k.rawCast = (nat_lit 1).rawCast * k := by simp
theorem coeff_mul {a₃ c₂ k : ℕ}
(a₁ a₂ : ℕ) (_ : a₃ = c₂ * k) : a₁ ^ a₂ * a₃ = (a₁ ^ a₂ * c₂) * k := by
subst_vars; rw [mul_assoc]
/-- Given a monomial expression `va`, splits off the leading coefficient `k` and the remainder
`e'`, stored in the `ExtractCoeff` structure.
* `c = 1 * c` (if `c` is a constant)
* `a * b = (a * b') * k` if `b = b' * k`
-/
def extractCoeff {a : Q(ℕ)} (va : ExProd sℕ a) : ExtractCoeff a :=
match va with
| .const _ _ =>
have k : Q(ℕ) := a.appArg!
⟨k, q((nat_lit 1).rawCast), .const 1, (q(coeff_one $k) : Expr)⟩
| .mul (x := a₁) (e := a₂) va₁ va₂ va₃ =>
let ⟨k, _, vc, pc⟩ := extractCoeff va₃
⟨k, _, .mul va₁ va₂ vc, q(coeff_mul $a₁ $a₂ $pc)⟩
theorem pow_one_cast (a : R) : a ^ (nat_lit 1).rawCast = a := by simp
theorem zero_pow {b : ℕ} (_ : 0 < b) : (0 : R) ^ b = 0 := match b with | b+1 => by simp [pow_succ]
theorem single_pow {b : ℕ} (_ : (a : R) ^ b = c) : (a + 0) ^ b = c + 0 := by
simp [*]
theorem pow_nat {b c k : ℕ} {d e : R} (_ : b = c * k) (_ : a ^ c = d) (_ : d ^ k = e) :
(a : R) ^ b = e := by
subst_vars; simp [pow_mul]
/-- Exponentiates a polynomial `va` by a monomial `vb`, including several special cases.
* `a ^ 1 = a`
* `0 ^ e = 0` if `0 < e`
* `(a + 0) ^ b = a ^ b` computed using `evalPowProd`
* `a ^ b = (a ^ b') ^ k` if `b = b' * k` and `k > 1`
Otherwise `a ^ b` is just encoded as `a ^ b * 1 + 0` using `evalPowAtom`.
-/
partial def evalPow₁ {a : Q($α)} {b : Q(ℕ)} (va : ExSum sα a) (vb : ExProd sℕ b) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExSum sα) q($a ^ $b) := do
match va, vb with
| va, .const 1 =>
haveI : $b =Q Nat.rawCast (nat_lit 1) := ⟨⟩
return ⟨_, va, q(pow_one_cast $a)⟩
| .zero, vb => match vb.evalPos with
| some p => return ⟨_, .zero, q(zero_pow (R := $α) $p)⟩
| none => return evalPowAtom sα (.sum .zero) vb
| ExSum.add va .zero, vb => -- TODO: using `.add` here takes a while to compile?
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalPowProd sα va vb
return ⟨_, vc.toSum, q(single_pow $pc)⟩
| va, vb =>
if vb.coeff > 1 then
let ⟨k, _, vc, pc⟩ := extractCoeff vb
let ⟨_, vd, pd⟩ ← evalPow₁ va vc
let ⟨_, ve, pe⟩ ← evalPowNat sα vd k
return ⟨_, ve, q(pow_nat $pc $pd $pe)⟩
else
return evalPowAtom sα (.sum va) vb
theorem pow_zero (a : R) : a ^ 0 = (nat_lit 1).rawCast + 0 := by simp
theorem pow_add {b₁ b₂ : ℕ} {d : R}
(_ : a ^ b₁ = c₁) (_ : a ^ b₂ = c₂) (_ : c₁ * c₂ = d) : (a : R) ^ (b₁ + b₂) = d := by
subst_vars; simp [_root_.pow_add]
/-- Exponentiates two polynomials `va, vb`.
* `a ^ 0 = 1`
* `a ^ (b₁ + b₂) = a ^ b₁ * a ^ b₂`
-/
def evalPow {a : Q($α)} {b : Q(ℕ)} (va : ExSum sα a) (vb : ExSum sℕ b) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExSum sα) q($a ^ $b) := do
match vb with
| .zero => return ⟨_, (ExProd.mkNat sα 1).2.toSum, q(pow_zero $a)⟩
| .add vb₁ vb₂ =>
let ⟨_, vc₁, pc₁⟩ ← evalPow₁ sα va vb₁
let ⟨_, vc₂, pc₂⟩ ← evalPow va vb₂
let ⟨_, vd, pd⟩ ← evalMul sα vc₁ vc₂
return ⟨_, vd, q(pow_add $pc₁ $pc₂ $pd)⟩
/-- This cache contains data required by the `ring` tactic during execution. -/
structure Cache {α : Q(Type u)} (sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)) where
/-- A ring instance on `α`, if available. -/
rα : Option Q(Ring $α)
/-- A division ring instance on `α`, if available. -/
dα : Option Q(DivisionRing $α)
/-- A characteristic zero ring instance on `α`, if available. -/
czα : Option Q(CharZero $α)
/-- Create a new cache for `α` by doing the necessary instance searches. -/
def mkCache {α : Q(Type u)} (sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)) : MetaM (Cache sα) :=
return {
rα := (← trySynthInstanceQ q(Ring $α)).toOption
dα := (← trySynthInstanceQ q(DivisionRing $α)).toOption
czα := (← trySynthInstanceQ q(CharZero $α)).toOption }
theorem cast_pos {n : ℕ} : IsNat (a : R) n → a = n.rawCast + 0
| ⟨e⟩ => by simp [e]
theorem cast_zero : IsNat (a : R) (nat_lit 0) → a = 0
| ⟨e⟩ => by simp [e]
theorem cast_neg {n : ℕ} {R} [Ring R] {a : R} :
IsInt a (.negOfNat n) → a = (Int.negOfNat n).rawCast + 0
| ⟨e⟩ => by simp [e]
theorem cast_rat {n : ℤ} {d : ℕ} {R} [DivisionRing R] {a : R} :
IsRat a n d → a = Rat.rawCast n d + 0
| ⟨_, e⟩ => by simp [e, div_eq_mul_inv]
/-- Converts a proof by `norm_num` that `e` is a numeral, into a normalization as a monomial:
* `e = 0` if `norm_num` returns `IsNat e 0`
* `e = Nat.rawCast n + 0` if `norm_num` returns `IsNat e n`
* `e = Int.rawCast n + 0` if `norm_num` returns `IsInt e n`
* `e = Rat.rawCast n d + 0` if `norm_num` returns `IsRat e n d`
-/
def evalCast {α : Q(Type u)} (sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)) {e : Q($α)} :
NormNum.Result e → Option (Result (ExSum sα) e)
| .isNat _ (.lit (.natVal 0)) p => do
assumeInstancesCommute
pure ⟨_, .zero, q(cast_zero $p)⟩
| .isNat _ lit p => do
assumeInstancesCommute
pure ⟨_, (ExProd.mkNat sα lit.natLit!).2.toSum, (q(cast_pos $p) :)⟩
| .isNegNat rα lit p =>
pure ⟨_, (ExProd.mkNegNat _ rα lit.natLit!).2.toSum, (q(cast_neg $p) : Expr)⟩
| .isRat dα q n d p =>
pure ⟨_, (ExProd.mkRat sα dα q n d q(IsRat.den_nz $p)).2.toSum, (q(cast_rat $p) : Expr)⟩
| _ => none
theorem toProd_pf (p : (a : R) = a') :
a = a' ^ (nat_lit 1).rawCast * (nat_lit 1).rawCast := by simp [*]
theorem atom_pf (a : R) : a = a ^ (nat_lit 1).rawCast * (nat_lit 1).rawCast + 0 := by simp
theorem atom_pf' (p : (a : R) = a') :
a = a' ^ (nat_lit 1).rawCast * (nat_lit 1).rawCast + 0 := by simp [*]
/--
Evaluates an atom, an expression where `ring` can find no additional structure.
* `a = a ^ 1 * 1 + 0`
-/
def evalAtom (e : Q($α)) : AtomM (Result (ExSum sα) e) := do
let r ← (← read).evalAtom e
have e' : Q($α) := r.expr
let (i, ⟨a', _⟩) ← addAtomQ e'
let ve' := (ExBase.atom i (e := a')).toProd (ExProd.mkNat sℕ 1).2 |>.toSum
pure ⟨_, ve', match r.proof? with
| none => (q(atom_pf $e) : Expr)
| some (p : Q($e = $a')) => (q(atom_pf' $p) : Expr)⟩
theorem inv_mul {R} [DivisionRing R] {a₁ a₂ a₃ b₁ b₃ c}
(_ : (a₁⁻¹ : R) = b₁) (_ : (a₃⁻¹ : R) = b₃)
(_ : b₃ * (b₁ ^ a₂ * (nat_lit 1).rawCast) = c) :
(a₁ ^ a₂ * a₃ : R)⁻¹ = c := by subst_vars; simp
nonrec theorem inv_zero {R} [DivisionRing R] : (0 : R)⁻¹ = 0 := inv_zero
theorem inv_single {R} [DivisionRing R] {a b : R}
(_ : (a : R)⁻¹ = b) : (a + 0)⁻¹ = b + 0 := by simp [*]
theorem inv_add {a₁ a₂ : ℕ} (_ : ((a₁ : ℕ) : R) = b₁) (_ : ((a₂ : ℕ) : R) = b₂) :
((a₁ + a₂ : ℕ) : R) = b₁ + b₂ := by
subst_vars; simp
section
variable (dα : Q(DivisionRing $α))
/-- Applies `⁻¹` to a polynomial to get an atom. -/
def evalInvAtom (a : Q($α)) : AtomM (Result (ExBase sα) q($a⁻¹)) := do
let (i, ⟨b', _⟩) ← addAtomQ q($a⁻¹)
pure ⟨b', ExBase.atom i, q(Eq.refl $b')⟩
/-- Inverts a polynomial `va` to get a normalized result polynomial.
* `c⁻¹ = (c⁻¹)` if `c` is a constant
* `(a ^ b * c)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ ^ b * c⁻¹`
-/
def ExProd.evalInv {a : Q($α)} (czα : Option Q(CharZero $α)) (va : ExProd sα a) :
AtomM (Result (ExProd sα) q($a⁻¹)) := do
Lean.Core.checkSystem decl_name%.toString
match va with
| .const c hc =>
let ra := Result.ofRawRat c a hc
match NormNum.evalInv.core q($a⁻¹) a ra dα czα with
| some rc =>
let ⟨zc, hc⟩ := rc.toRatNZ.get!
let ⟨c, pc⟩ := rc.toRawEq
pure ⟨c, .const zc hc, pc⟩
| none =>
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalInvAtom sα dα a
pure ⟨_, vc.toProd (ExProd.mkNat sℕ 1).2, q(toProd_pf $pc)⟩
| .mul (x := a₁) (e := _a₂) _va₁ va₂ va₃ => do
let ⟨_b₁, vb₁, pb₁⟩ ← evalInvAtom sα dα a₁
let ⟨_b₃, vb₃, pb₃⟩ ← va₃.evalInv czα
let ⟨c, vc, (pc : Q($_b₃ * ($_b₁ ^ $_a₂ * Nat.rawCast 1) = $c))⟩ ←
evalMulProd sα vb₃ (vb₁.toProd va₂)
pure ⟨c, vc, (q(inv_mul $pb₁ $pb₃ $pc) : Expr)⟩
/-- Inverts a polynomial `va` to get a normalized result polynomial.
* `0⁻¹ = 0`
* `a⁻¹ = (a⁻¹)` if `a` is a nontrivial sum
-/
def ExSum.evalInv {a : Q($α)} (czα : Option Q(CharZero $α)) (va : ExSum sα a) :
AtomM (Result (ExSum sα) q($a⁻¹)) :=
match va with
| ExSum.zero => pure ⟨_, .zero, (q(inv_zero (R := $α)) : Expr)⟩
| ExSum.add va ExSum.zero => do
let ⟨_, vb, pb⟩ ← va.evalInv sα dα czα
pure ⟨_, vb.toSum, (q(inv_single $pb) : Expr)⟩
| va => do
let ⟨_, vb, pb⟩ ← evalInvAtom sα dα a
pure ⟨_, vb.toProd (ExProd.mkNat sℕ 1).2 |>.toSum, q(atom_pf' $pb)⟩
end
theorem div_pf {R} [DivisionRing R] {a b c d : R} (_ : b⁻¹ = c) (_ : a * c = d) : a / b = d := by
subst_vars; simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
/-- Divides two polynomials `va, vb` to get a normalized result polynomial.
* `a / b = a * b⁻¹`
-/
def evalDiv {a b : Q($α)} (rα : Q(DivisionRing $α)) (czα : Option Q(CharZero $α)) (va : ExSum sα a)
(vb : ExSum sα b) : AtomM (Result (ExSum sα) q($a / $b)) := do
let ⟨_c, vc, pc⟩ ← vb.evalInv sα rα czα
let ⟨d, vd, (pd : Q($a * $_c = $d))⟩ ← evalMul sα va vc
pure ⟨d, vd, q(div_pf $pc $pd)⟩
theorem add_congr (_ : a = a') (_ : b = b') (_ : a' + b' = c) : (a + b : R) = c := by
subst_vars; rfl
theorem mul_congr (_ : a = a') (_ : b = b') (_ : a' * b' = c) : (a * b : R) = c := by
subst_vars; rfl
theorem nsmul_congr {a a' : ℕ} (_ : (a : ℕ) = a') (_ : b = b') (_ : a' • b' = c) :
(a • (b : R)) = c := by
subst_vars; rfl
theorem pow_congr {b b' : ℕ} (_ : a = a') (_ : b = b')
(_ : a' ^ b' = c) : (a ^ b : R) = c := by subst_vars; rfl
theorem neg_congr {R} [Ring R] {a a' b : R} (_ : a = a')
(_ : -a' = b) : (-a : R) = b := by subst_vars; rfl
theorem sub_congr {R} [Ring R] {a a' b b' c : R} (_ : a = a') (_ : b = b')
(_ : a' - b' = c) : (a - b : R) = c := by subst_vars; rfl
theorem inv_congr {R} [DivisionRing R] {a a' b : R} (_ : a = a')
(_ : a'⁻¹ = b) : (a⁻¹ : R) = b := by subst_vars; rfl
theorem div_congr {R} [DivisionRing R] {a a' b b' c : R} (_ : a = a') (_ : b = b')
(_ : a' / b' = c) : (a / b : R) = c := by subst_vars; rfl
/-- A precomputed `Cache` for `ℕ`. -/
def Cache.nat : Cache sℕ := { rα := none, dα := none, czα := some q(inferInstance) }
/-- Checks whether `e` would be processed by `eval` as a ring expression,
or otherwise if it is an atom or something simplifiable via `norm_num`.
We use this in `ring_nf` to avoid rewriting atoms unnecessarily.
Returns:
* `none` if `eval` would process `e` as an algebraic ring expression
* `some none` if `eval` would treat `e` as an atom.
* `some (some r)` if `eval` would not process `e` as an algebraic ring expression,
but `NormNum.derive` can nevertheless simplify `e`, with result `r`.
-/
-- Note this is not the same as whether the result of `eval` is an atom. (e.g. consider `x + 0`.)
def isAtomOrDerivable {u} {α : Q(Type u)} (sα : Q(CommSemiring $α))
(c : Cache sα) (e : Q($α)) : AtomM (Option (Option (Result (ExSum sα) e))) := do
let els := try
pure <| some (evalCast sα (← derive e))
catch _ => pure (some none)
let .const n _ := (← withReducible <| whnf e).getAppFn | els
match n, c.rα, c.dα with
| ``HAdd.hAdd, _, _ | ``Add.add, _, _
| ``HMul.hMul, _, _ | ``Mul.mul, _, _
| ``HSMul.hSMul, _, _
| ``HPow.hPow, _, _ | ``Pow.pow, _, _
| ``Neg.neg, some _, _
| ``HSub.hSub, some _, _ | ``Sub.sub, some _, _
| ``Inv.inv, _, some _
| ``HDiv.hDiv, _, some _ | ``Div.div, _, some _ => pure none
| _, _, _ => els
/--
Evaluates expression `e` of type `α` into a normalized representation as a polynomial.
This is the main driver of `ring`, which calls out to `evalAdd`, `evalMul` etc.
-/
partial def eval {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} (sα : Q(CommSemiring $α))
(c : Cache sα) (e : Q($α)) : AtomM (Result (ExSum sα) e) := Lean.withIncRecDepth do
let els := do
try evalCast sα (← derive e)
catch _ => evalAtom sα e
let .const n _ := (← withReducible <| whnf e).getAppFn | els
match n, c.rα, c.dα with
| ``HAdd.hAdd, _, _ | ``Add.add, _, _ => match e with
| ~q($a + $b) =>
let ⟨_, va, pa⟩ ← eval sα c a
let ⟨_, vb, pb⟩ ← eval sα c b
let ⟨c, vc, p⟩ ← evalAdd sα va vb
pure ⟨c, vc, q(add_congr $pa $pb $p)⟩
| | _ => els
| Mathlib/Tactic/Ring/Basic.lean | 1,114 | 1,114 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Simon Hudon
-/
import Mathlib.Control.Functor.Multivariate
import Mathlib.Data.PFunctor.Multivariate.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.PFunctor.Multivariate.M
import Mathlib.Data.QPF.Multivariate.Basic
/-!
# The final co-algebra of a multivariate qpf is again a qpf.
For a `(n+1)`-ary QPF `F (α₀,..,αₙ)`, we take the least fixed point of `F` with
regards to its last argument `αₙ`. The result is an `n`-ary functor: `Fix F (α₀,..,αₙ₋₁)`.
Making `Fix F` into a functor allows us to take the fixed point, compose with other functors
and take a fixed point again.
## Main definitions
* `Cofix.mk` - constructor
* `Cofix.dest` - destructor
* `Cofix.corec` - corecursor: useful for formulating infinite, productive computations
* `Cofix.bisim` - bisimulation: proof technique to show the equality of possibly infinite values
of `Cofix F α`
## Implementation notes
For `F` a QPF, we define `Cofix F α` in terms of the M-type of the polynomial functor `P` of `F`.
We define the relation `Mcongr` and take its quotient as the definition of `Cofix F α`.
`Mcongr` is taken as the weakest bisimulation on M-type. See
[avigad-carneiro-hudon2019] for more details.
## Reference
* Jeremy Avigad, Mario M. Carneiro and Simon Hudon.
[*Data Types as Quotients of Polynomial Functors*][avigad-carneiro-hudon2019]
-/
universe u
open MvFunctor
namespace MvQPF
open TypeVec MvPFunctor
open MvFunctor (LiftP LiftR)
variable {n : ℕ} {F : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1) → Type u} [q : MvQPF F]
/-- `corecF` is used as a basis for defining the corecursor of `Cofix F α`. `corecF`
uses corecursion to construct the M-type generated by `q.P` and uses function on `F`
as a corecursive step -/
def corecF {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type u} (g : β → F (α.append1 β)) : β → q.P.M α :=
M.corec _ fun x => repr (g x)
theorem corecF_eq {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type u} (g : β → F (α.append1 β)) (x : β) :
M.dest q.P (corecF g x) = appendFun id (corecF g) <$$> repr (g x) := by
rw [corecF, M.dest_corec]
/-- Characterization of desirable equivalence relations on M-types -/
def IsPrecongr {α : TypeVec n} (r : q.P.M α → q.P.M α → Prop) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃x y⦄,
r x y →
abs (appendFun id (Quot.mk r) <$$> M.dest q.P x) =
abs (appendFun id (Quot.mk r) <$$> M.dest q.P y)
/-- Equivalence relation on M-types representing a value of type `Cofix F` -/
def Mcongr {α : TypeVec n} (x y : q.P.M α) : Prop :=
∃ r, IsPrecongr r ∧ r x y
/-- Greatest fixed point of functor F. The result is a functor with one fewer parameters
than the input. For `F a b c` a ternary functor, fix F is a binary functor such that
```lean
Cofix F a b = F a b (Cofix F a b)
```
-/
def Cofix (F : TypeVec (n + 1) → Type u) [MvQPF F] (α : TypeVec n) :=
Quot (@Mcongr _ F _ α)
instance {α : TypeVec n} [Inhabited q.P.A] [∀ i : Fin2 n, Inhabited (α i)] :
Inhabited (Cofix F α) :=
⟨Quot.mk _ default⟩
/-- maps every element of the W type to a canonical representative -/
def mRepr {α : TypeVec n} : q.P.M α → q.P.M α :=
corecF (abs ∘ M.dest q.P)
/-- the map function for the functor `Cofix F` -/
def Cofix.map {α β : TypeVec n} (g : α ⟹ β) : Cofix F α → Cofix F β :=
Quot.lift (fun x : q.P.M α => Quot.mk Mcongr (g <$$> x))
(by
rintro aa₁ aa₂ ⟨r, pr, ra₁a₂⟩; apply Quot.sound
let r' b₁ b₂ := ∃ a₁ a₂ : q.P.M α, r a₁ a₂ ∧ b₁ = g <$$> a₁ ∧ b₂ = g <$$> a₂
use r'; constructor
· show IsPrecongr r'
rintro b₁ b₂ ⟨a₁, a₂, ra₁a₂, b₁eq, b₂eq⟩
let u : Quot r → Quot r' :=
Quot.lift (fun x : q.P.M α => Quot.mk r' (g <$$> x))
(by
intro a₁ a₂ ra₁a₂
apply Quot.sound
exact ⟨a₁, a₂, ra₁a₂, rfl, rfl⟩)
have hu : (Quot.mk r' ∘ fun x : q.P.M α => g <$$> x) = u ∘ Quot.mk r := by
ext x
rfl
rw [b₁eq, b₂eq, M.dest_map, M.dest_map, ← q.P.comp_map, ← q.P.comp_map]
rw [← appendFun_comp, id_comp, hu, ← comp_id g, appendFun_comp]
rw [q.P.comp_map, q.P.comp_map, abs_map, pr ra₁a₂, ← abs_map]
show r' (g <$$> aa₁) (g <$$> aa₂); exact ⟨aa₁, aa₂, ra₁a₂, rfl, rfl⟩)
instance Cofix.mvfunctor : MvFunctor (Cofix F) where map := @Cofix.map _ _ _
/-- Corecursor for `Cofix F` -/
def Cofix.corec {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type u} (g : β → F (α.append1 β)) : β → Cofix F α := fun x =>
Quot.mk _ (corecF g x)
/-- Destructor for `Cofix F` -/
def Cofix.dest {α : TypeVec n} : Cofix F α → F (α.append1 (Cofix F α)) :=
Quot.lift (fun x => appendFun id (Quot.mk Mcongr) <$$> abs (M.dest q.P x))
(by
rintro x y ⟨r, pr, rxy⟩
dsimp
have : ∀ x y, r x y → Mcongr x y := by
intro x y h
exact ⟨r, pr, h⟩
rw [← Quot.factor_mk_eq _ _ this]
conv =>
lhs
rw [appendFun_comp_id, comp_map, ← abs_map, pr rxy, abs_map, ← comp_map,
← appendFun_comp_id])
/-- Abstraction function for `cofix F α` -/
def Cofix.abs {α} : q.P.M α → Cofix F α :=
Quot.mk _
/-- Representation function for `Cofix F α` -/
def Cofix.repr {α} : Cofix F α → q.P.M α :=
M.corec _ <| q.repr ∘ Cofix.dest
/-- Corecursor for `Cofix F` -/
def Cofix.corec'₁ {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type u} (g : ∀ {X}, (β → X) → F (α.append1 X)) (x : β) :
Cofix F α :=
Cofix.corec (fun _ => g id) x
/-- More flexible corecursor for `Cofix F`. Allows the return of a fully formed
value instead of making a recursive call -/
def Cofix.corec' {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type u} (g : β → F (α.append1 (Cofix F α ⊕ β))) (x : β) :
Cofix F α :=
let f : (α ::: Cofix F α) ⟹ (α ::: (Cofix F α ⊕ β)) := id ::: Sum.inl
Cofix.corec (Sum.elim (MvFunctor.map f ∘ Cofix.dest) g) (Sum.inr x : Cofix F α ⊕ β)
/-- Corecursor for `Cofix F`. The shape allows recursive calls to
look like recursive calls. -/
def Cofix.corec₁ {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type u}
(g : ∀ {X}, (Cofix F α → X) → (β → X) → β → F (α ::: X)) (x : β) : Cofix F α :=
Cofix.corec' (fun x => g Sum.inl Sum.inr x) x
theorem Cofix.dest_corec {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type u} (g : β → F (α.append1 β)) (x : β) :
Cofix.dest (Cofix.corec g x) = appendFun id (Cofix.corec g) <$$> g x := by
conv =>
lhs
rw [Cofix.dest, Cofix.corec]
dsimp
rw [corecF_eq, abs_map, abs_repr, ← comp_map, ← appendFun_comp]; rfl
/-- constructor for `Cofix F` -/
def Cofix.mk {α : TypeVec n} : F (α.append1 <| Cofix F α) → Cofix F α :=
Cofix.corec fun x => (appendFun id fun i : Cofix F α => Cofix.dest.{u} i) <$$> x
/-!
## Bisimulation principles for `Cofix F`
The following theorems are bisimulation principles. The general idea
is to use a bisimulation relation to prove the equality between
specific values of type `Cofix F α`.
A bisimulation relation `R` for values `x y : Cofix F α`:
* holds for `x y`: `R x y`
* for any values `x y` that satisfy `R`, their root has the same shape
and their children can be paired in such a way that they satisfy `R`.
-/
private theorem Cofix.bisim_aux {α : TypeVec n} (r : Cofix F α → Cofix F α → Prop) (h' : ∀ x, r x x)
(h : ∀ x y, r x y →
appendFun id (Quot.mk r) <$$> Cofix.dest x = appendFun id (Quot.mk r) <$$> Cofix.dest y) :
∀ x y, r x y → x = y := by
intro x
rcases x; clear x; rename M (P F) α => x
intro y
rcases y; clear y; rename M (P F) α => y
intro rxy
apply Quot.sound
let r' := fun x y => r (Quot.mk _ x) (Quot.mk _ y)
have hr' : r' = fun x y => r (Quot.mk _ x) (Quot.mk _ y) := rfl
have : IsPrecongr r' := by
intro a b r'ab
have h₀ :
appendFun id (Quot.mk r ∘ Quot.mk Mcongr) <$$> MvQPF.abs (M.dest q.P a) =
appendFun id (Quot.mk r ∘ Quot.mk Mcongr) <$$> MvQPF.abs (M.dest q.P b) := by
rw [appendFun_comp_id, comp_map, comp_map]; exact h _ _ r'ab
have h₁ : ∀ u v : q.P.M α, Mcongr u v → Quot.mk r' u = Quot.mk r' v := by
intro u v cuv
apply Quot.sound
dsimp [r', hr']
rw [Quot.sound cuv]
apply h'
let f : Quot r → Quot r' :=
Quot.lift (Quot.lift (Quot.mk r') h₁)
(by
intro c
apply Quot.inductionOn
(motive := fun c =>
∀b, r c b → Quot.lift (Quot.mk r') h₁ c = Quot.lift (Quot.mk r') h₁ b) c
clear c
intro c d
apply Quot.inductionOn
(motive := fun d => r (Quot.mk Mcongr c) d →
Quot.lift (Quot.mk r') h₁ (Quot.mk Mcongr c) = Quot.lift (Quot.mk r') h₁ d) d
clear d
intro d rcd; apply Quot.sound; apply rcd)
have : f ∘ Quot.mk r ∘ Quot.mk Mcongr = Quot.mk r' := rfl
rw [← this, appendFun_comp_id, q.P.comp_map, q.P.comp_map, abs_map, abs_map, abs_map, abs_map,
h₀]
exact ⟨r', this, rxy⟩
/-- Bisimulation principle using `map` and `Quot.mk` to match and relate children of two trees. -/
theorem Cofix.bisim_rel {α : TypeVec n} (r : Cofix F α → Cofix F α → Prop)
(h : ∀ x y, r x y →
appendFun id (Quot.mk r) <$$> Cofix.dest x = appendFun id (Quot.mk r) <$$> Cofix.dest y) :
∀ x y, r x y → x = y := by
let r' (x y) := x = y ∨ r x y
intro x y rxy
apply Cofix.bisim_aux r'
· intro x
left
rfl
· intro x y r'xy
cases r'xy with
| inl h =>
rw [h]
| inr r'xy =>
have : ∀ x y, r x y → r' x y := fun x y h => Or.inr h
rw [← Quot.factor_mk_eq _ _ this]
dsimp [r']
rw [appendFun_comp_id]
rw [@comp_map _ _ q _ _ _ (appendFun id (Quot.mk r)),
@comp_map _ _ q _ _ _ (appendFun id (Quot.mk r))]
rw [h _ _ r'xy]
right; exact rxy
/-- Bisimulation principle using `LiftR` to match and relate children of two trees. -/
theorem Cofix.bisim {α : TypeVec n} (r : Cofix F α → Cofix F α → Prop)
(h : ∀ x y, r x y → LiftR (RelLast α r) (Cofix.dest x) (Cofix.dest y)) :
∀ x y, r x y → x = y := by
apply Cofix.bisim_rel
intro x y rxy
rcases (liftR_iff (fun a b => RelLast α r b) (dest x) (dest y)).mp (h x y rxy)
with ⟨a, f₀, f₁, dxeq, dyeq, h'⟩
rw [dxeq, dyeq, ← abs_map, ← abs_map, MvPFunctor.map_eq, MvPFunctor.map_eq]
rw [← split_dropFun_lastFun f₀, ← split_dropFun_lastFun f₁]
rw [appendFun_comp_splitFun, appendFun_comp_splitFun]
rw [id_comp, id_comp]
congr 2 with (i j); rcases i with - | i
· apply Quot.sound
apply h' _ j
· change f₀ _ j = f₁ _ j
apply h' _ j
open MvFunctor
/-- Bisimulation principle using `LiftR'` to match and relate children of two trees. -/
theorem Cofix.bisim₂ {α : TypeVec n} (r : Cofix F α → Cofix F α → Prop)
(h : ∀ x y, r x y → LiftR' (RelLast' α r) (Cofix.dest x) (Cofix.dest y)) :
∀ x y, r x y → x = y :=
Cofix.bisim r <| by intros; rw [← LiftR_RelLast_iff]; apply h; assumption
/-- Bisimulation principle the values `⟨a,f⟩` of the polynomial functor representing
`Cofix F α` as well as an invariant `Q : β → Prop` and a state `β` generating the
left-hand side and right-hand side of the equality through functions `u v : β → Cofix F α` -/
theorem Cofix.bisim' {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} (Q : β → Prop) (u v : β → Cofix F α)
(h : ∀ x, Q x → ∃ a f' f₀ f₁,
Cofix.dest (u x) = q.abs ⟨a, q.P.appendContents f' f₀⟩ ∧
Cofix.dest (v x) = q.abs ⟨a, q.P.appendContents f' f₁⟩ ∧
∀ i, ∃ x', Q x' ∧ f₀ i = u x' ∧ f₁ i = v x') :
∀ x, Q x → u x = v x := fun x Qx =>
let R := fun w z : Cofix F α => ∃ x', Q x' ∧ w = u x' ∧ z = v x'
Cofix.bisim R
(fun x y ⟨x', Qx', xeq, yeq⟩ => by
rcases h x' Qx' with ⟨a, f', f₀, f₁, ux'eq, vx'eq, h'⟩
rw [liftR_iff]
refine
⟨a, q.P.appendContents f' f₀, q.P.appendContents f' f₁, xeq.symm ▸ ux'eq,
yeq.symm ▸ vx'eq, ?_⟩
intro i; cases i
· apply h'
· intro j
apply Eq.refl)
_ _ ⟨x, Qx, rfl, rfl⟩
theorem Cofix.mk_dest {α : TypeVec n} (x : Cofix F α) : Cofix.mk (Cofix.dest x) = x := by
apply Cofix.bisim_rel (fun x y : Cofix F α => x = Cofix.mk (Cofix.dest y)) _ _ _ rfl
dsimp
intro x y h
rw [h]
conv =>
lhs
congr
rfl
rw [Cofix.mk]
rw [Cofix.dest_corec]
rw [← comp_map, ← appendFun_comp, id_comp]
rw [← comp_map, ← appendFun_comp, id_comp, ← Cofix.mk]
congr
apply congrArg
funext x
apply Quot.sound
rfl
theorem Cofix.dest_mk {α : TypeVec n} (x : F (α.append1 <| Cofix F α)) :
Cofix.dest (Cofix.mk x) = x := by
have : Cofix.mk ∘ Cofix.dest = @_root_.id (Cofix F α) := funext Cofix.mk_dest
rw [Cofix.mk, Cofix.dest_corec, ← comp_map, ← Cofix.mk, ← appendFun_comp, this, id_comp,
appendFun_id_id, MvFunctor.id_map]
theorem Cofix.ext {α : TypeVec n} (x y : Cofix F α) (h : x.dest = y.dest) : x = y := by
rw [← Cofix.mk_dest x, h, Cofix.mk_dest]
theorem Cofix.ext_mk {α : TypeVec n} (x y : F (α ::: Cofix F α)) (h : Cofix.mk x = Cofix.mk y) :
x = y := by rw [← Cofix.dest_mk x, h, Cofix.dest_mk]
/-!
`liftR_map`, `liftR_map_last` and `liftR_map_last'` are useful for reasoning about
the induction step in bisimulation proofs.
-/
section LiftRMap
theorem liftR_map {α β : TypeVec n} {F' : TypeVec n → Type u} [MvFunctor F'] [LawfulMvFunctor F']
(R : β ⊗ β ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) (x : F' α) (f g : α ⟹ β) (h : α ⟹ Subtype_ R)
(hh : subtypeVal _ ⊚ h = (f ⊗' g) ⊚ prod.diag) : LiftR' R (f <$$> x) (g <$$> x) := by
rw [LiftR_def]
exists h <$$> x
rw [MvFunctor.map_map, comp_assoc, hh, ← comp_assoc, fst_prod_mk, comp_assoc, fst_diag]
rw [MvFunctor.map_map, comp_assoc, hh, ← comp_assoc, snd_prod_mk, comp_assoc, snd_diag]
dsimp [LiftR']; constructor <;> rfl
open Function
theorem liftR_map_last [lawful : LawfulMvFunctor F]
{α : TypeVec n} {ι ι'} (R : ι' → ι' → Prop)
(x : F (α ::: ι)) (f g : ι → ι') (hh : ∀ x : ι, R (f x) (g x)) :
LiftR' (RelLast' _ R) ((id ::: f) <$$> x) ((id ::: g) <$$> x) :=
let h : ι → { x : ι' × ι' // uncurry R x } := fun x => ⟨(f x, g x), hh x⟩
let b : (α ::: ι) ⟹ _ := @diagSub n α ::: h
let c :
(Subtype_ α.repeatEq ::: { x // uncurry R x }) ⟹
| ((fun i : Fin2 n => { x // ofRepeat (α.RelLast' R i.fs x) }) ::: Subtype (uncurry R)) :=
ofSubtype _ ::: id
| Mathlib/Data/QPF/Multivariate/Constructions/Cofix.lean | 366 | 367 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.CharZero
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity.Core
/-!
# Casts of rational numbers into linear ordered fields.
-/
variable {F ι α β : Type*}
namespace Rat
variable {p q : ℚ}
@[simp]
theorem castHom_rat : castHom ℚ = RingHom.id ℚ :=
RingHom.ext cast_id
section LinearOrderedField
variable {K : Type*} [Field K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K]
theorem cast_pos_of_pos (hq : 0 < q) : (0 : K) < q := by
rw [Rat.cast_def]
exact div_pos (Int.cast_pos.2 <| num_pos.2 hq) (Nat.cast_pos.2 q.pos)
@[mono]
theorem cast_strictMono : StrictMono ((↑) : ℚ → K) := fun p q => by
simpa only [sub_pos, cast_sub] using cast_pos_of_pos (K := K) (q := q - p)
@[mono]
theorem cast_mono : Monotone ((↑) : ℚ → K) :=
cast_strictMono.monotone
/-- Coercion from `ℚ` as an order embedding. -/
@[simps!]
def castOrderEmbedding : ℚ ↪o K :=
OrderEmbedding.ofStrictMono (↑) cast_strictMono
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_le : (p : K) ≤ q ↔ p ≤ q := castOrderEmbedding.le_iff_le
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_lt : (p : K) < q ↔ p < q := cast_strictMono.lt_iff_lt
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.ratCast_le_ratCast⟩ := cast_le
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.ratCast_lt_ratCast⟩ := cast_lt
@[simp] lemma cast_nonneg : 0 ≤ (q : K) ↔ 0 ≤ q := by norm_cast
@[simp] lemma cast_nonpos : (q : K) ≤ 0 ↔ q ≤ 0 := by norm_cast
@[simp] lemma cast_pos : (0 : K) < q ↔ 0 < q := by norm_cast
@[simp] lemma cast_lt_zero : (q : K) < 0 ↔ q < 0 := by norm_cast
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_le_natCast {m : ℚ} {n : ℕ} : (m : K) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ (n : ℚ) := by
rw [← cast_le (K := K), cast_natCast]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_le_cast {m : ℕ} {n : ℚ} : (m : K) ≤ n ↔ (m : ℚ) ≤ n := by
rw [← cast_le (K := K), cast_natCast]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_le_intCast {m : ℚ} {n : ℤ} : (m : K) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ (n : ℚ) := by
rw [← cast_le (K := K), cast_intCast]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_le_cast {m : ℤ} {n : ℚ} : (m : K) ≤ n ↔ (m : ℚ) ≤ n := by
rw [← cast_le (K := K), cast_intCast]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_lt_natCast {m : ℚ} {n : ℕ} : (m : K) < n ↔ m < (n : ℚ) := by
rw [← cast_lt (K := K), cast_natCast]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_lt_cast {m : ℕ} {n : ℚ} : (m : K) < n ↔ (m : ℚ) < n := by
rw [← cast_lt (K := K), cast_natCast]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_lt_intCast {m : ℚ} {n : ℤ} : (m : K) < n ↔ m < (n : ℚ) := by
rw [← cast_lt (K := K), cast_intCast]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_lt_cast {m : ℤ} {n : ℚ} : (m : K) < n ↔ (m : ℚ) < n := by
rw [← cast_lt (K := K), cast_intCast]
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma cast_min (p q : ℚ) : (↑(min p q) : K) = min (p : K) (q : K) := (@cast_mono K _).map_min
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma cast_max (p q : ℚ) : (↑(max p q) : K) = max (p : K) (q : K) := (@cast_mono K _).map_max
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_abs (q : ℚ) : ((|q| : ℚ) : K) = |(q : K)| := by simp [abs_eq_max_neg]
open Set
@[simp]
theorem preimage_cast_Icc (p q : ℚ) : (↑) ⁻¹' Icc (p : K) q = Icc p q :=
castOrderEmbedding.preimage_Icc ..
@[simp]
theorem preimage_cast_Ico (p q : ℚ) : (↑) ⁻¹' Ico (p : K) q = Ico p q :=
castOrderEmbedding.preimage_Ico ..
@[simp]
theorem preimage_cast_Ioc (p q : ℚ) : (↑) ⁻¹' Ioc (p : K) q = Ioc p q :=
castOrderEmbedding.preimage_Ioc p q
@[simp]
theorem preimage_cast_Ioo (p q : ℚ) : (↑) ⁻¹' Ioo (p : K) q = Ioo p q :=
castOrderEmbedding.preimage_Ioo p q
@[simp]
theorem preimage_cast_Ici (q : ℚ) : (↑) ⁻¹' Ici (q : K) = Ici q :=
castOrderEmbedding.preimage_Ici q
@[simp]
theorem preimage_cast_Iic (q : ℚ) : (↑) ⁻¹' Iic (q : K) = Iic q :=
castOrderEmbedding.preimage_Iic q
@[simp]
theorem preimage_cast_Ioi (q : ℚ) : (↑) ⁻¹' Ioi (q : K) = Ioi q :=
castOrderEmbedding.preimage_Ioi q
@[simp]
theorem preimage_cast_Iio (q : ℚ) : (↑) ⁻¹' Iio (q : K) = Iio q :=
castOrderEmbedding.preimage_Iio q
@[simp]
theorem preimage_cast_uIcc (p q : ℚ) : (↑) ⁻¹' uIcc (p : K) q = uIcc p q :=
(castOrderEmbedding (K := K)).preimage_uIcc p q
@[simp]
theorem preimage_cast_uIoc (p q : ℚ) : (↑) ⁻¹' uIoc (p : K) q = uIoc p q :=
(castOrderEmbedding (K := K)).preimage_uIoc p q
end LinearOrderedField
end Rat
namespace NNRat
variable {K} [Semifield K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K] {p q : ℚ≥0}
theorem cast_strictMono : StrictMono ((↑) : ℚ≥0 → K) := fun p q h => by
rwa [NNRat.cast_def, NNRat.cast_def, div_lt_div_iff₀, ← Nat.cast_mul, ← Nat.cast_mul,
Nat.cast_lt (α := K), ← NNRat.lt_def]
· simp
· simp
@[mono]
theorem cast_mono : Monotone ((↑) : ℚ≥0 → K) :=
| cast_strictMono.monotone
| Mathlib/Data/Rat/Cast/Order.lean | 156 | 156 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Bilinear
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Equiv.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Congruence.Hom
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
import Mathlib.Tactic.SuppressCompilation
/-!
# Tensor product of modules over commutative semirings.
This file constructs the tensor product of modules over commutative semirings. Given a semiring `R`
and modules over it `M` and `N`, the standard construction of the tensor product is
`TensorProduct R M N`. It is also a module over `R`.
It comes with a canonical bilinear map
`TensorProduct.mk R M N : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] TensorProduct R M N`.
Given any bilinear map `f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P`, there is a unique linear map
`TensorProduct.lift f : TensorProduct R M N →ₗ[R] P` whose composition with the canonical bilinear
map `TensorProduct.mk` is the given bilinear map `f`. Uniqueness is shown in the theorem
`TensorProduct.lift.unique`.
## Notation
* This file introduces the notation `M ⊗ N` and `M ⊗[R] N` for the tensor product space
`TensorProduct R M N`.
* It introduces the notation `m ⊗ₜ n` and `m ⊗ₜ[R] n` for the tensor product of two elements,
otherwise written as `TensorProduct.tmul R m n`.
## Tags
bilinear, tensor, tensor product
-/
suppress_compilation
section Semiring
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
variable {R' : Type*} [Monoid R']
variable {R'' : Type*} [Semiring R'']
variable {A M N P Q S T : Type*}
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid N] [AddCommMonoid P]
variable [AddCommMonoid Q] [AddCommMonoid S] [AddCommMonoid T]
variable [Module R M] [Module R N] [Module R Q] [Module R S] [Module R T]
variable [DistribMulAction R' M]
variable [Module R'' M]
variable (M N)
namespace TensorProduct
section
variable (R)
/-- The relation on `FreeAddMonoid (M × N)` that generates a congruence whose quotient is
the tensor product. -/
inductive Eqv : FreeAddMonoid (M × N) → FreeAddMonoid (M × N) → Prop
| of_zero_left : ∀ n : N, Eqv (.of (0, n)) 0
| of_zero_right : ∀ m : M, Eqv (.of (m, 0)) 0
| of_add_left : ∀ (m₁ m₂ : M) (n : N), Eqv (.of (m₁, n) + .of (m₂, n)) (.of (m₁ + m₂, n))
| of_add_right : ∀ (m : M) (n₁ n₂ : N), Eqv (.of (m, n₁) + .of (m, n₂)) (.of (m, n₁ + n₂))
| of_smul : ∀ (r : R) (m : M) (n : N), Eqv (.of (r • m, n)) (.of (m, r • n))
| add_comm : ∀ x y, Eqv (x + y) (y + x)
end
end TensorProduct
variable (R) in
/-- The tensor product of two modules `M` and `N` over the same commutative semiring `R`.
The localized notations are `M ⊗ N` and `M ⊗[R] N`, accessed by `open scoped TensorProduct`. -/
def TensorProduct : Type _ :=
(addConGen (TensorProduct.Eqv R M N)).Quotient
set_option quotPrecheck false in
@[inherit_doc TensorProduct] scoped[TensorProduct] infixl:100 " ⊗ " => TensorProduct _
@[inherit_doc] scoped[TensorProduct] notation:100 M " ⊗[" R "] " N:100 => TensorProduct R M N
namespace TensorProduct
section Module
protected instance zero : Zero (M ⊗[R] N) :=
(addConGen (TensorProduct.Eqv R M N)).zero
protected instance add : Add (M ⊗[R] N) :=
(addConGen (TensorProduct.Eqv R M N)).hasAdd
instance addZeroClass : AddZeroClass (M ⊗[R] N) :=
{ (addConGen (TensorProduct.Eqv R M N)).addMonoid with
/- The `toAdd` field is given explicitly as `TensorProduct.add` for performance reasons.
This avoids any need to unfold `Con.addMonoid` when the type checker is checking
that instance diagrams commute -/
toAdd := TensorProduct.add _ _
toZero := TensorProduct.zero _ _ }
instance addSemigroup : AddSemigroup (M ⊗[R] N) :=
{ (addConGen (TensorProduct.Eqv R M N)).addMonoid with
toAdd := TensorProduct.add _ _ }
instance addCommSemigroup : AddCommSemigroup (M ⊗[R] N) :=
{ (addConGen (TensorProduct.Eqv R M N)).addMonoid with
toAddSemigroup := TensorProduct.addSemigroup _ _
add_comm := fun x y =>
AddCon.induction_on₂ x y fun _ _ =>
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.add_comm _ _ }
instance : Inhabited (M ⊗[R] N) :=
⟨0⟩
variable {M N}
variable (R) in
/-- The canonical function `M → N → M ⊗ N`. The localized notations are `m ⊗ₜ n` and `m ⊗ₜ[R] n`,
accessed by `open scoped TensorProduct`. -/
def tmul (m : M) (n : N) : M ⊗[R] N :=
AddCon.mk' _ <| FreeAddMonoid.of (m, n)
/-- The canonical function `M → N → M ⊗ N`. -/
infixl:100 " ⊗ₜ " => tmul _
/-- The canonical function `M → N → M ⊗ N`. -/
notation:100 x " ⊗ₜ[" R "] " y:100 => tmul R x y
@[elab_as_elim, induction_eliminator]
protected theorem induction_on {motive : M ⊗[R] N → Prop} (z : M ⊗[R] N)
(zero : motive 0)
(tmul : ∀ x y, motive <| x ⊗ₜ[R] y)
(add : ∀ x y, motive x → motive y → motive (x + y)) : motive z :=
AddCon.induction_on z fun x =>
FreeAddMonoid.recOn x zero fun ⟨m, n⟩ y ih => by
rw [AddCon.coe_add]
exact add _ _ (tmul ..) ih
/-- Lift an `R`-balanced map to the tensor product.
A map `f : M →+ N →+ P` additive in both components is `R`-balanced, or middle linear with respect
to `R`, if scalar multiplication in either argument is equivalent, `f (r • m) n = f m (r • n)`.
Note that strictly the first action should be a right-action by `R`, but for now `R` is commutative
so it doesn't matter. -/
-- TODO: use this to implement `lift` and `SMul.aux`. For now we do not do this as it causes
-- performance issues elsewhere.
def liftAddHom (f : M →+ N →+ P)
(hf : ∀ (r : R) (m : M) (n : N), f (r • m) n = f m (r • n)) :
M ⊗[R] N →+ P :=
(addConGen (TensorProduct.Eqv R M N)).lift (FreeAddMonoid.lift (fun mn : M × N => f mn.1 mn.2)) <|
AddCon.addConGen_le fun x y hxy =>
match x, y, hxy with
| _, _, .of_zero_left n =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [map_zero, FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, map_zero,
AddMonoidHom.zero_apply]
| _, _, .of_zero_right m =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [map_zero, FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, map_zero]
| _, _, .of_add_left m₁ m₂ n =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [map_add, FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, map_add,
AddMonoidHom.add_apply]
| _, _, .of_add_right m n₁ n₂ =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [map_add, FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, map_add]
| _, _, .of_smul s m n =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by rw [FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, hf]
| _, _, .add_comm x y =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [map_add, add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem liftAddHom_tmul (f : M →+ N →+ P)
(hf : ∀ (r : R) (m : M) (n : N), f (r • m) n = f m (r • n)) (m : M) (n : N) :
liftAddHom f hf (m ⊗ₜ n) = f m n :=
rfl
variable (M) in
@[simp]
theorem zero_tmul (n : N) : (0 : M) ⊗ₜ[R] n = 0 :=
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.of_zero_left _
theorem add_tmul (m₁ m₂ : M) (n : N) : (m₁ + m₂) ⊗ₜ n = m₁ ⊗ₜ n + m₂ ⊗ₜ[R] n :=
Eq.symm <| Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.of_add_left _ _ _
variable (N) in
@[simp]
theorem tmul_zero (m : M) : m ⊗ₜ[R] (0 : N) = 0 :=
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.of_zero_right _
theorem tmul_add (m : M) (n₁ n₂ : N) : m ⊗ₜ (n₁ + n₂) = m ⊗ₜ n₁ + m ⊗ₜ[R] n₂ :=
Eq.symm <| Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.of_add_right _ _ _
instance uniqueLeft [Subsingleton M] : Unique (M ⊗[R] N) where
default := 0
uniq z := z.induction_on rfl (fun x y ↦ by rw [Subsingleton.elim x 0, zero_tmul]) <| by
rintro _ _ rfl rfl; apply add_zero
instance uniqueRight [Subsingleton N] : Unique (M ⊗[R] N) where
default := 0
uniq z := z.induction_on rfl (fun x y ↦ by rw [Subsingleton.elim y 0, tmul_zero]) <| by
rintro _ _ rfl rfl; apply add_zero
section
variable (R R' M N)
/-- A typeclass for `SMul` structures which can be moved across a tensor product.
This typeclass is generated automatically from an `IsScalarTower` instance, but exists so that
we can also add an instance for `AddCommGroup.toIntModule`, allowing `z •` to be moved even if
`R` does not support negation.
Note that `Module R' (M ⊗[R] N)` is available even without this typeclass on `R'`; it's only
needed if `TensorProduct.smul_tmul`, `TensorProduct.smul_tmul'`, or `TensorProduct.tmul_smul` is
used.
-/
class CompatibleSMul [DistribMulAction R' N] : Prop where
smul_tmul : ∀ (r : R') (m : M) (n : N), (r • m) ⊗ₜ n = m ⊗ₜ[R] (r • n)
end
/-- Note that this provides the default `CompatibleSMul R R M N` instance through
`IsScalarTower.left`. -/
instance (priority := 100) CompatibleSMul.isScalarTower [SMul R' R] [IsScalarTower R' R M]
[DistribMulAction R' N] [IsScalarTower R' R N] : CompatibleSMul R R' M N :=
⟨fun r m n => by
conv_lhs => rw [← one_smul R m]
conv_rhs => rw [← one_smul R n]
rw [← smul_assoc, ← smul_assoc]
exact Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.of_smul _ _ _⟩
/-- `smul` can be moved from one side of the product to the other . -/
theorem smul_tmul [DistribMulAction R' N] [CompatibleSMul R R' M N] (r : R') (m : M) (n : N) :
(r • m) ⊗ₜ n = m ⊗ₜ[R] (r • n) :=
CompatibleSMul.smul_tmul _ _ _
private def addMonoidWithWrongNSMul : AddMonoid (M ⊗[R] N) :=
{ (addConGen (TensorProduct.Eqv R M N)).addMonoid with }
attribute [local instance] addMonoidWithWrongNSMul in
/-- Auxiliary function to defining scalar multiplication on tensor product. -/
def SMul.aux {R' : Type*} [SMul R' M] (r : R') : FreeAddMonoid (M × N) →+ M ⊗[R] N :=
FreeAddMonoid.lift fun p : M × N => (r • p.1) ⊗ₜ p.2
theorem SMul.aux_of {R' : Type*} [SMul R' M] (r : R') (m : M) (n : N) :
SMul.aux r (.of (m, n)) = (r • m) ⊗ₜ[R] n :=
rfl
variable [SMulCommClass R R' M] [SMulCommClass R R'' M]
/-- Given two modules over a commutative semiring `R`, if one of the factors carries a
(distributive) action of a second type of scalars `R'`, which commutes with the action of `R`, then
the tensor product (over `R`) carries an action of `R'`.
This instance defines this `R'` action in the case that it is the left module which has the `R'`
action. Two natural ways in which this situation arises are:
* Extension of scalars
* A tensor product of a group representation with a module not carrying an action
Note that in the special case that `R = R'`, since `R` is commutative, we just get the usual scalar
action on a tensor product of two modules. This special case is important enough that, for
performance reasons, we define it explicitly below. -/
instance leftHasSMul : SMul R' (M ⊗[R] N) :=
⟨fun r =>
(addConGen (TensorProduct.Eqv R M N)).lift (SMul.aux r : _ →+ M ⊗[R] N) <|
AddCon.addConGen_le fun x y hxy =>
match x, y, hxy with
| _, _, .of_zero_left n =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [map_zero, SMul.aux_of, smul_zero, zero_tmul]
| _, _, .of_zero_right m =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [map_zero, SMul.aux_of, tmul_zero]
| _, _, .of_add_left m₁ m₂ n =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [map_add, SMul.aux_of, smul_add, add_tmul]
| _, _, .of_add_right m n₁ n₂ =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [map_add, SMul.aux_of, tmul_add]
| _, _, .of_smul s m n =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by rw [SMul.aux_of, SMul.aux_of, ← smul_comm, smul_tmul]
| _, _, .add_comm x y =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [map_add, add_comm]⟩
instance : SMul R (M ⊗[R] N) :=
TensorProduct.leftHasSMul
protected theorem smul_zero (r : R') : r • (0 : M ⊗[R] N) = 0 :=
AddMonoidHom.map_zero _
protected theorem smul_add (r : R') (x y : M ⊗[R] N) : r • (x + y) = r • x + r • y :=
AddMonoidHom.map_add _ _ _
protected theorem zero_smul (x : M ⊗[R] N) : (0 : R'') • x = 0 :=
have : ∀ (r : R'') (m : M) (n : N), r • m ⊗ₜ[R] n = (r • m) ⊗ₜ n := fun _ _ _ => rfl
x.induction_on (by rw [TensorProduct.smul_zero])
(fun m n => by rw [this, zero_smul, zero_tmul]) fun x y ihx ihy => by
rw [TensorProduct.smul_add, ihx, ihy, add_zero]
protected theorem one_smul (x : M ⊗[R] N) : (1 : R') • x = x :=
have : ∀ (r : R') (m : M) (n : N), r • m ⊗ₜ[R] n = (r • m) ⊗ₜ n := fun _ _ _ => rfl
x.induction_on (by rw [TensorProduct.smul_zero])
(fun m n => by rw [this, one_smul])
fun x y ihx ihy => by rw [TensorProduct.smul_add, ihx, ihy]
protected theorem add_smul (r s : R'') (x : M ⊗[R] N) : (r + s) • x = r • x + s • x :=
have : ∀ (r : R'') (m : M) (n : N), r • m ⊗ₜ[R] n = (r • m) ⊗ₜ n := fun _ _ _ => rfl
x.induction_on (by simp_rw [TensorProduct.smul_zero, add_zero])
(fun m n => by simp_rw [this, add_smul, add_tmul]) fun x y ihx ihy => by
simp_rw [TensorProduct.smul_add]
rw [ihx, ihy, add_add_add_comm]
instance addMonoid : AddMonoid (M ⊗[R] N) :=
{ TensorProduct.addZeroClass _ _ with
toAddSemigroup := TensorProduct.addSemigroup _ _
toZero := TensorProduct.zero _ _
nsmul := fun n v => n • v
nsmul_zero := by simp [TensorProduct.zero_smul]
nsmul_succ := by simp only [TensorProduct.one_smul, TensorProduct.add_smul, add_comm,
forall_const] }
instance addCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (M ⊗[R] N) :=
{ TensorProduct.addCommSemigroup _ _ with
toAddMonoid := TensorProduct.addMonoid }
instance leftDistribMulAction : DistribMulAction R' (M ⊗[R] N) :=
have : ∀ (r : R') (m : M) (n : N), r • m ⊗ₜ[R] n = (r • m) ⊗ₜ n := fun _ _ _ => rfl
{ smul_add := fun r x y => TensorProduct.smul_add r x y
mul_smul := fun r s x =>
x.induction_on (by simp_rw [TensorProduct.smul_zero])
(fun m n => by simp_rw [this, mul_smul]) fun x y ihx ihy => by
simp_rw [TensorProduct.smul_add]
rw [ihx, ihy]
one_smul := TensorProduct.one_smul
smul_zero := TensorProduct.smul_zero }
instance : DistribMulAction R (M ⊗[R] N) :=
TensorProduct.leftDistribMulAction
theorem smul_tmul' (r : R') (m : M) (n : N) : r • m ⊗ₜ[R] n = (r • m) ⊗ₜ n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tmul_smul [DistribMulAction R' N] [CompatibleSMul R R' M N] (r : R') (x : M) (y : N) :
x ⊗ₜ (r • y) = r • x ⊗ₜ[R] y :=
(smul_tmul _ _ _).symm
theorem smul_tmul_smul (r s : R) (m : M) (n : N) : (r • m) ⊗ₜ[R] (s • n) = (r * s) • m ⊗ₜ[R] n := by
simp_rw [smul_tmul, tmul_smul, mul_smul]
instance leftModule : Module R'' (M ⊗[R] N) :=
{ add_smul := TensorProduct.add_smul
zero_smul := TensorProduct.zero_smul }
instance : Module R (M ⊗[R] N) :=
TensorProduct.leftModule
instance [Module R''ᵐᵒᵖ M] [IsCentralScalar R'' M] : IsCentralScalar R'' (M ⊗[R] N) where
op_smul_eq_smul r x :=
x.induction_on (by rw [smul_zero, smul_zero])
(fun x y => by rw [smul_tmul', smul_tmul', op_smul_eq_smul]) fun x y hx hy => by
rw [smul_add, smul_add, hx, hy]
section
-- Like `R'`, `R'₂` provides a `DistribMulAction R'₂ (M ⊗[R] N)`
variable {R'₂ : Type*} [Monoid R'₂] [DistribMulAction R'₂ M]
variable [SMulCommClass R R'₂ M]
/-- `SMulCommClass R' R'₂ M` implies `SMulCommClass R' R'₂ (M ⊗[R] N)` -/
instance smulCommClass_left [SMulCommClass R' R'₂ M] : SMulCommClass R' R'₂ (M ⊗[R] N) where
smul_comm r' r'₂ x :=
TensorProduct.induction_on x (by simp_rw [TensorProduct.smul_zero])
(fun m n => by simp_rw [smul_tmul', smul_comm]) fun x y ihx ihy => by
simp_rw [TensorProduct.smul_add]; rw [ihx, ihy]
variable [SMul R'₂ R']
/-- `IsScalarTower R'₂ R' M` implies `IsScalarTower R'₂ R' (M ⊗[R] N)` -/
instance isScalarTower_left [IsScalarTower R'₂ R' M] : IsScalarTower R'₂ R' (M ⊗[R] N) :=
⟨fun s r x =>
x.induction_on (by simp)
(fun m n => by rw [smul_tmul', smul_tmul', smul_tmul', smul_assoc]) fun x y ihx ihy => by
rw [smul_add, smul_add, smul_add, ihx, ihy]⟩
variable [DistribMulAction R'₂ N] [DistribMulAction R' N]
variable [CompatibleSMul R R'₂ M N] [CompatibleSMul R R' M N]
/-- `IsScalarTower R'₂ R' N` implies `IsScalarTower R'₂ R' (M ⊗[R] N)` -/
instance isScalarTower_right [IsScalarTower R'₂ R' N] : IsScalarTower R'₂ R' (M ⊗[R] N) :=
⟨fun s r x =>
x.induction_on (by simp)
(fun m n => by rw [← tmul_smul, ← tmul_smul, ← tmul_smul, smul_assoc]) fun x y ihx ihy => by
rw [smul_add, smul_add, smul_add, ihx, ihy]⟩
end
/-- A short-cut instance for the common case, where the requirements for the `compatible_smul`
instances are sufficient. -/
instance isScalarTower [SMul R' R] [IsScalarTower R' R M] : IsScalarTower R' R (M ⊗[R] N) :=
TensorProduct.isScalarTower_left
-- or right
variable (R M N) in
/-- The canonical bilinear map `M → N → M ⊗[R] N`. -/
def mk : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] M ⊗[R] N :=
LinearMap.mk₂ R (· ⊗ₜ ·) add_tmul (fun c m n => by simp_rw [smul_tmul, tmul_smul])
tmul_add tmul_smul
@[simp]
theorem mk_apply (m : M) (n : N) : mk R M N m n = m ⊗ₜ n :=
rfl
theorem ite_tmul (x₁ : M) (x₂ : N) (P : Prop) [Decidable P] :
(if P then x₁ else 0) ⊗ₜ[R] x₂ = if P then x₁ ⊗ₜ x₂ else 0 := by split_ifs <;> simp
theorem tmul_ite (x₁ : M) (x₂ : N) (P : Prop) [Decidable P] :
(x₁ ⊗ₜ[R] if P then x₂ else 0) = if P then x₁ ⊗ₜ x₂ else 0 := by split_ifs <;> simp
lemma tmul_single {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {M : ι → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M i)]
[∀ i, Module R (M i)] (i : ι) (x : N) (m : M i) (j : ι) :
x ⊗ₜ[R] Pi.single i m j = (Pi.single i (x ⊗ₜ[R] m) : ∀ i, N ⊗[R] M i) j := by
by_cases h : i = j <;> aesop
lemma single_tmul {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {M : ι → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M i)]
[∀ i, Module R (M i)] (i : ι) (x : N) (m : M i) (j : ι) :
Pi.single i m j ⊗ₜ[R] x = (Pi.single i (m ⊗ₜ[R] x) : ∀ i, M i ⊗[R] N) j := by
by_cases h : i = j <;> aesop
section
theorem sum_tmul {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (m : α → M) (n : N) :
(∑ a ∈ s, m a) ⊗ₜ[R] n = ∑ a ∈ s, m a ⊗ₜ[R] n := by
classical
induction s using Finset.induction with
| empty => simp
| insert _ _ has ih => simp [Finset.sum_insert has, add_tmul, ih]
theorem tmul_sum (m : M) {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (n : α → N) :
(m ⊗ₜ[R] ∑ a ∈ s, n a) = ∑ a ∈ s, m ⊗ₜ[R] n a := by
classical
induction s using Finset.induction with
| empty => simp
| insert _ _ has ih => simp [Finset.sum_insert has, tmul_add, ih]
end
variable (R M N)
/-- The simple (aka pure) elements span the tensor product. -/
theorem span_tmul_eq_top : Submodule.span R { t : M ⊗[R] N | ∃ m n, m ⊗ₜ n = t } = ⊤ := by
ext t; simp only [Submodule.mem_top, iff_true]
refine t.induction_on ?_ ?_ ?_
· exact Submodule.zero_mem _
· intro m n
apply Submodule.subset_span
use m, n
· intro t₁ t₂ ht₁ ht₂
exact Submodule.add_mem _ ht₁ ht₂
@[simp]
theorem map₂_mk_top_top_eq_top : Submodule.map₂ (mk R M N) ⊤ ⊤ = ⊤ := by
rw [← top_le_iff, ← span_tmul_eq_top, Submodule.map₂_eq_span_image2]
exact Submodule.span_mono fun _ ⟨m, n, h⟩ => ⟨m, trivial, n, trivial, h⟩
theorem exists_eq_tmul_of_forall (x : TensorProduct R M N)
(h : ∀ (m₁ m₂ : M) (n₁ n₂ : N), ∃ m n, m₁ ⊗ₜ n₁ + m₂ ⊗ₜ n₂ = m ⊗ₜ[R] n) :
∃ m n, x = m ⊗ₜ n := by
induction x with
| zero =>
use 0, 0
rw [TensorProduct.zero_tmul]
| tmul m n => use m, n
| add x y h₁ h₂ =>
obtain ⟨m₁, n₁, rfl⟩ := h₁
obtain ⟨m₂, n₂, rfl⟩ := h₂
apply h
end Module
variable [Module R P]
section UniversalProperty
variable {M N}
variable (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P)
/-- Auxiliary function to constructing a linear map `M ⊗ N → P` given a bilinear map `M → N → P`
with the property that its composition with the canonical bilinear map `M → N → M ⊗ N` is
the given bilinear map `M → N → P`. -/
def liftAux : M ⊗[R] N →+ P :=
liftAddHom (LinearMap.toAddMonoidHom'.comp <| f.toAddMonoidHom)
fun r m n => by dsimp; rw [LinearMap.map_smul₂, map_smul]
theorem liftAux_tmul (m n) : liftAux f (m ⊗ₜ n) = f m n :=
rfl
variable {f}
@[simp]
theorem liftAux.smul (r : R) (x) : liftAux f (r • x) = r • liftAux f x :=
TensorProduct.induction_on x (smul_zero _).symm
(fun p q => by simp_rw [← tmul_smul, liftAux_tmul, (f p).map_smul])
fun p q ih1 ih2 => by simp_rw [smul_add, (liftAux f).map_add, ih1, ih2, smul_add]
variable (f) in
/-- Constructing a linear map `M ⊗ N → P` given a bilinear map `M → N → P` with the property that
its composition with the canonical bilinear map `M → N → M ⊗ N` is
the given bilinear map `M → N → P`. -/
def lift : M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P :=
{ liftAux f with map_smul' := liftAux.smul }
@[simp]
theorem lift.tmul (x y) : lift f (x ⊗ₜ y) = f x y :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift.tmul' (x y) : (lift f).1 (x ⊗ₜ y) = f x y :=
rfl
theorem ext' {g h : M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P} (H : ∀ x y, g (x ⊗ₜ y) = h (x ⊗ₜ y)) : g = h :=
LinearMap.ext fun z =>
TensorProduct.induction_on z (by simp_rw [LinearMap.map_zero]) H fun x y ihx ihy => by
rw [g.map_add, h.map_add, ihx, ihy]
theorem lift.unique {g : M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P} (H : ∀ x y, g (x ⊗ₜ y) = f x y) : g = lift f :=
ext' fun m n => by rw [H, lift.tmul]
theorem lift_mk : lift (mk R M N) = LinearMap.id :=
Eq.symm <| lift.unique fun _ _ => rfl
theorem lift_compr₂ (g : P →ₗ[R] Q) : lift (f.compr₂ g) = g.comp (lift f) :=
Eq.symm <| lift.unique fun _ _ => by simp
theorem lift_mk_compr₂ (f : M ⊗ N →ₗ[R] P) : lift ((mk R M N).compr₂ f) = f := by
rw [lift_compr₂ f, lift_mk, LinearMap.comp_id]
/-- This used to be an `@[ext]` lemma, but it fails very slowly when the `ext` tactic tries to apply
it in some cases, notably when one wants to show equality of two linear maps. The `@[ext]`
attribute is now added locally where it is needed. Using this as the `@[ext]` lemma instead of
`TensorProduct.ext'` allows `ext` to apply lemmas specific to `M →ₗ _` and `N →ₗ _`.
See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
theorem ext {g h : M ⊗ N →ₗ[R] P} (H : (mk R M N).compr₂ g = (mk R M N).compr₂ h) : g = h := by
rw [← lift_mk_compr₂ g, H, lift_mk_compr₂]
attribute [local ext high] ext
example : M → N → (M → N → P) → P := fun m => flip fun f => f m
variable (R M N P) in
/-- Linearly constructing a linear map `M ⊗ N → P` given a bilinear map `M → N → P`
with the property that its composition with the canonical bilinear map `M → N → M ⊗ N` is
the given bilinear map `M → N → P`. -/
def uncurry : (M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P) →ₗ[R] M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P :=
LinearMap.flip <| lift <| LinearMap.lflip.comp (LinearMap.flip LinearMap.id)
@[simp]
theorem uncurry_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P) (m : M) (n : N) :
uncurry R M N P f (m ⊗ₜ n) = f m n := by rw [uncurry, LinearMap.flip_apply, lift.tmul]; rfl
variable (R M N P)
/-- A linear equivalence constructing a linear map `M ⊗ N → P` given a bilinear map `M → N → P`
with the property that its composition with the canonical bilinear map `M → N → M ⊗ N` is
the given bilinear map `M → N → P`. -/
def lift.equiv : (M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P) ≃ₗ[R] M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P :=
{ uncurry R M N P with
invFun := fun f => (mk R M N).compr₂ f
left_inv := fun _ => LinearMap.ext₂ fun _ _ => lift.tmul _ _
right_inv := fun _ => ext' fun _ _ => lift.tmul _ _ }
@[simp]
theorem lift.equiv_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P) (m : M) (n : N) :
lift.equiv R M N P f (m ⊗ₜ n) = f m n :=
uncurry_apply f m n
@[simp]
theorem lift.equiv_symm_apply (f : M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P) (m : M) (n : N) :
(lift.equiv R M N P).symm f m n = f (m ⊗ₜ n) :=
rfl
/-- Given a linear map `M ⊗ N → P`, compose it with the canonical bilinear map `M → N → M ⊗ N` to
form a bilinear map `M → N → P`. -/
def lcurry : (M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P) →ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P :=
(lift.equiv R M N P).symm
variable {R M N P}
@[simp]
theorem lcurry_apply (f : M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P) (m : M) (n : N) : lcurry R M N P f m n = f (m ⊗ₜ n) :=
rfl
/-- Given a linear map `M ⊗ N → P`, compose it with the canonical bilinear map `M → N → M ⊗ N` to
form a bilinear map `M → N → P`. -/
def curry (f : M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P) : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P :=
lcurry R M N P f
@[simp]
theorem curry_apply (f : M ⊗ N →ₗ[R] P) (m : M) (n : N) : curry f m n = f (m ⊗ₜ n) :=
rfl
theorem curry_injective : Function.Injective (curry : (M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P) → M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P) :=
fun _ _ H => ext H
theorem ext_threefold {g h : (M ⊗[R] N) ⊗[R] P →ₗ[R] Q}
(H : ∀ x y z, g (x ⊗ₜ y ⊗ₜ z) = h (x ⊗ₜ y ⊗ₜ z)) : g = h := by
ext x y z
exact H x y z
-- We'll need this one for checking the pentagon identity!
theorem ext_fourfold {g h : ((M ⊗[R] N) ⊗[R] P) ⊗[R] Q →ₗ[R] S}
(H : ∀ w x y z, g (w ⊗ₜ x ⊗ₜ y ⊗ₜ z) = h (w ⊗ₜ x ⊗ₜ y ⊗ₜ z)) : g = h := by
ext w x y z
exact H w x y z
/-- Two linear maps (M ⊗ N) ⊗ (P ⊗ Q) → S which agree on all elements of the
form (m ⊗ₜ n) ⊗ₜ (p ⊗ₜ q) are equal. -/
theorem ext_fourfold' {φ ψ : (M ⊗[R] N) ⊗[R] P ⊗[R] Q →ₗ[R] S}
(H : ∀ w x y z, φ (w ⊗ₜ x ⊗ₜ (y ⊗ₜ z)) = ψ (w ⊗ₜ x ⊗ₜ (y ⊗ₜ z))) : φ = ψ := by
ext m n p q
exact H m n p q
end UniversalProperty
variable {M N}
section
variable (R M N)
/-- The tensor product of modules is commutative, up to linear equivalence.
-/
protected def comm : M ⊗[R] N ≃ₗ[R] N ⊗[R] M :=
LinearEquiv.ofLinear (lift (mk R N M).flip) (lift (mk R M N).flip) (ext' fun _ _ => rfl)
(ext' fun _ _ => rfl)
@[simp]
theorem comm_tmul (m : M) (n : N) : (TensorProduct.comm R M N) (m ⊗ₜ n) = n ⊗ₜ m :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comm_symm_tmul (m : M) (n : N) : (TensorProduct.comm R M N).symm (n ⊗ₜ m) = m ⊗ₜ n :=
rfl
lemma lift_comp_comm_eq (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P) :
lift f ∘ₗ TensorProduct.comm R N M = lift f.flip :=
ext rfl
end
section CompatibleSMul
variable (R A M N) [CommSemiring A] [Module A M] [Module A N] [SMulCommClass R A M]
[CompatibleSMul R A M N]
/-- If M and N are both R- and A-modules and their actions on them commute,
and if the A-action on `M ⊗[R] N` can switch between the two factors, then there is a
canonical A-linear map from `M ⊗[A] N` to `M ⊗[R] N`. -/
def mapOfCompatibleSMul : M ⊗[A] N →ₗ[A] M ⊗[R] N :=
lift
{ toFun := fun m ↦
{ __ := mk R M N m
map_smul' := fun _ _ ↦ (smul_tmul _ _ _).symm }
map_add' := fun _ _ ↦ LinearMap.ext <| by simp
map_smul' := fun _ _ ↦ rfl }
@[simp] theorem mapOfCompatibleSMul_tmul (m n) : mapOfCompatibleSMul R A M N (m ⊗ₜ n) = m ⊗ₜ n :=
rfl
theorem mapOfCompatibleSMul_surjective : Function.Surjective (mapOfCompatibleSMul R A M N) :=
fun x ↦ x.induction_on (⟨0, map_zero _⟩) (fun m n ↦ ⟨_, mapOfCompatibleSMul_tmul ..⟩)
| fun _ _ ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ ↦ ⟨x + y, by simpa using congr($hx + $hy)⟩
attribute [local instance] SMulCommClass.symm
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/TensorProduct/Basic.lean | 669 | 672 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Homeomorph.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Topology.StoneCech
/-!
# Extremally disconnected spaces
An extremally disconnected topological space is a space in which the closure of every open set is
open. Such spaces are also called Stonean spaces. They are the projective objects in the category of
compact Hausdorff spaces.
## Main declarations
* `ExtremallyDisconnected`: Predicate for a space to be extremally disconnected.
* `CompactT2.Projective`: Predicate for a topological space to be a projective object in the
category of compact Hausdorff spaces.
* `CompactT2.Projective.extremallyDisconnected`: Compact Hausdorff spaces that are projective are
extremally disconnected.
* `CompactT2.ExtremallyDisconnected.projective`: Extremally disconnected spaces are projective
objects in the category of compact Hausdorff spaces.
## References
[Gleason, *Projective topological spaces*][gleason1958]
-/
noncomputable section
open Function Set
universe u
variable (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X]
/-- An extremally disconnected topological space is a space
in which the closure of every open set is open. -/
class ExtremallyDisconnected : Prop where
/-- The closure of every open set is open. -/
open_closure : ∀ U : Set X, IsOpen U → IsOpen (closure U)
theorem extremallyDisconnected_of_homeo {X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y]
[ExtremallyDisconnected X] (e : X ≃ₜ Y) : ExtremallyDisconnected Y where
open_closure U hU := by
rw [e.symm.isInducing.closure_eq_preimage_closure_image, Homeomorph.isOpen_preimage]
exact ExtremallyDisconnected.open_closure _ (e.symm.isOpen_image.mpr hU)
| section TotallySeparated
/-- Extremally disconnected spaces are totally separated. -/
instance [ExtremallyDisconnected X] [T2Space X] : TotallySeparatedSpace X :=
{ isTotallySeparated_univ := by
| Mathlib/Topology/ExtremallyDisconnected.lean | 51 | 55 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Antoine Chambert-Loir. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Antoine Chambert-Loir
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Range
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Prod
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Quotient.Basic
/-! # Exactness of a pair
* For two maps `f : M → N` and `g : N → P`, with `Zero P`,
`Function.Exact f g` says that `Set.range f = Set.preimage g {0}`
* For additive maps `f : M →+ N` and `g : N →+ P`,
`Exact f g` says that `range f = ker g`
* For linear maps `f : M →ₗ[R] N` and `g : N →ₗ[R] P`,
`Exact f g` says that `range f = ker g`
## TODO :
* generalize to `SemilinearMap`, even `SemilinearMapClass`
* add the multiplicative case (`Function.Exact` will become `Function.AddExact`?)
-/
variable {R M M' N N' P P' : Type*}
namespace Function
variable (f : M → N) (g : N → P) (g' : P → P')
/-- The maps `f` and `g` form an exact pair :
`g y = 0` iff `y` belongs to the image of `f` -/
def Exact [Zero P] : Prop := ∀ y, g y = 0 ↔ y ∈ Set.range f
variable {f g}
namespace Exact
lemma apply_apply_eq_zero [Zero P] (h : Exact f g) (x : M) :
g (f x) = 0 := (h _).mpr <| Set.mem_range_self _
lemma comp_eq_zero [Zero P] (h : Exact f g) : g.comp f = 0 :=
funext h.apply_apply_eq_zero
lemma of_comp_of_mem_range [Zero P] (h1 : g ∘ f = 0)
(h2 : ∀ x, g x = 0 → x ∈ Set.range f) : Exact f g :=
fun y => Iff.intro (h2 y) <|
Exists.rec ((forall_apply_eq_imp_iff (p := (g · = 0))).mpr (congrFun h1) y)
lemma comp_injective [Zero P] [Zero P'] (exact : Exact f g)
(inj : Function.Injective g') (h0 : g' 0 = 0) :
Exact f (g' ∘ g) := by
intro x
refine ⟨fun H => exact x |>.mp <| inj <| h0 ▸ H, ?_⟩
intro H
rw [Function.comp_apply, exact x |>.mpr H, h0]
lemma of_comp_eq_zero_of_ker_in_range [Zero P] (hc : g.comp f = 0)
(hr : ∀ y, g y = 0 → y ∈ Set.range f) :
Exact f g :=
fun y ↦ ⟨hr y, fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ↦ hx ▸ congrFun hc x⟩
/-- Two maps `f : M → N` and `g : N → P` are exact if and only if the induced maps
`Set.range f → N → Set.range g` are exact.
Note that if you already have an instance `[Zero (Set.range g)]` (which is unlikely) this lemma
may not apply if the zero of `Set.range g` is not definitionally equal to `⟨0, hg⟩`. -/
lemma iff_rangeFactorization [Zero P] (hg : 0 ∈ Set.range g) :
letI : Zero (Set.range g) := ⟨⟨0, hg⟩⟩
Exact f g ↔ Exact ((↑) : Set.range f → N) (Set.rangeFactorization g) := by
rw [Exact, Exact, Subtype.range_coe]
congr! 2
rw [Set.rangeFactorization]
exact ⟨fun _ ↦ by rwa [Subtype.ext_iff], fun h ↦ by rwa [Subtype.ext_iff] at h⟩
/-- If two maps `f : M → N` and `g : N → P` are exact, then the induced maps
`Set.range f → N → Set.range g` are exact.
Note that if you already have an instance `[Zero (Set.range g)]` (which is unlikely) this lemma
may not apply if the zero of `Set.range g` is not definitionally equal to `⟨0, hg⟩`. -/
lemma rangeFactorization [Zero P] (h : Exact f g) (hg : 0 ∈ Set.range g) :
letI : Zero (Set.range g) := ⟨⟨0, hg⟩⟩
Exact ((↑) : Set.range f → N) (Set.rangeFactorization g) :=
(iff_rangeFactorization hg).1 h
end Exact
end Function
section AddMonoidHom
variable [AddGroup M] [AddGroup N] [AddGroup P] {f : M →+ N} {g : N →+ P}
namespace AddMonoidHom
open Function
lemma exact_iff :
Exact f g ↔ ker g = range f :=
Iff.symm SetLike.ext_iff
lemma exact_of_comp_eq_zero_of_ker_le_range
(h1 : g.comp f = 0) (h2 : ker g ≤ range f) : Exact f g :=
Exact.of_comp_of_mem_range (congrArg DFunLike.coe h1) h2
lemma exact_of_comp_of_mem_range
(h1 : g.comp f = 0) (h2 : ∀ x, g x = 0 → x ∈ range f) : Exact f g :=
exact_of_comp_eq_zero_of_ker_le_range h1 h2
/-- When we have a commutative diagram from a sequence of two maps to another,
such that the left vertical map is surjective, the middle vertical map is bijective and the right
vertical map is injective, then the upper row is exact iff the lower row is.
See `ShortComplex.exact_iff_of_epi_of_isIso_of_mono` in the file
`Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Exact` for the categorical version of this result. -/
lemma exact_iff_of_surjective_of_bijective_of_injective
{M₁ M₂ M₃ N₁ N₂ N₃ : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M₁] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃]
[AddCommMonoid N₁] [AddCommMonoid N₂] [AddCommMonoid N₃]
(f : M₁ →+ M₂) (g : M₂ →+ M₃) (f' : N₁ →+ N₂) (g' : N₂ →+ N₃)
(τ₁ : M₁ →+ N₁) (τ₂ : M₂ →+ N₂) (τ₃ : M₃ →+ N₃)
(comm₁₂ : f'.comp τ₁ = τ₂.comp f)
(comm₂₃ : g'.comp τ₂ = τ₃.comp g)
(h₁ : Function.Surjective τ₁) (h₂ : Function.Bijective τ₂) (h₃ : Function.Injective τ₃) :
Exact f g ↔ Exact f' g' := by
replace comm₁₂ := DFunLike.congr_fun comm₁₂
replace comm₂₃ := DFunLike.congr_fun comm₂₃
dsimp at comm₁₂ comm₂₃
constructor
· intro h y₂
obtain ⟨x₂, rfl⟩ := h₂.2 y₂
constructor
· intro hx₂
obtain ⟨x₁, rfl⟩ := (h x₂).1 (h₃ (by simpa only [map_zero, comm₂₃] using hx₂))
exact ⟨τ₁ x₁, by simp only [comm₁₂]⟩
· rintro ⟨y₁, hy₁⟩
obtain ⟨x₁, rfl⟩ := h₁ y₁
rw [comm₂₃, (h x₂).2 _, map_zero]
exact ⟨x₁, h₂.1 (by simpa only [comm₁₂] using hy₁)⟩
· intro h x₂
constructor
· intro hx₂
obtain ⟨y₁, hy₁⟩ := (h (τ₂ x₂)).1 (by simp only [comm₂₃, hx₂, map_zero])
obtain ⟨x₁, rfl⟩ := h₁ y₁
exact ⟨x₁, h₂.1 (by simpa only [comm₁₂] using hy₁)⟩
· rintro ⟨x₁, rfl⟩
apply h₃
simp only [← comm₁₂, ← comm₂₃, h.apply_apply_eq_zero (τ₁ x₁), map_zero]
end AddMonoidHom
namespace Function.Exact
open AddMonoidHom
lemma addMonoidHom_ker_eq (hfg : Exact f g) :
ker g = range f :=
SetLike.ext hfg
lemma addMonoidHom_comp_eq_zero (h : Exact f g) : g.comp f = 0 :=
DFunLike.coe_injective h.comp_eq_zero
section
variable {X₁ X₂ X₃ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃ : Type*} [AddCommMonoid X₁] [AddCommMonoid X₂] [AddCommMonoid X₃]
[AddCommMonoid Y₁] [AddCommMonoid Y₂] [AddCommMonoid Y₃]
(e₁ : X₁ ≃+ Y₁) (e₂ : X₂ ≃+ Y₂) (e₃ : X₃ ≃+ Y₃)
{f₁₂ : X₁ →+ X₂} {f₂₃ : X₂ →+ X₃} {g₁₂ : Y₁ →+ Y₂} {g₂₃ : Y₂ →+ Y₃}
lemma iff_of_ladder_addEquiv (comm₁₂ : g₁₂.comp e₁ = AddMonoidHom.comp e₂ f₁₂)
(comm₂₃ : g₂₃.comp e₂ = AddMonoidHom.comp e₃ f₂₃) : Exact g₁₂ g₂₃ ↔ Exact f₁₂ f₂₃ :=
(exact_iff_of_surjective_of_bijective_of_injective _ _ _ _ e₁ e₂ e₃ comm₁₂ comm₂₃
e₁.surjective e₂.bijective e₃.injective).symm
lemma of_ladder_addEquiv_of_exact (comm₁₂ : g₁₂.comp e₁ = AddMonoidHom.comp e₂ f₁₂)
(comm₂₃ : g₂₃.comp e₂ = AddMonoidHom.comp e₃ f₂₃) (H : Exact f₁₂ f₂₃) : Exact g₁₂ g₂₃ :=
(iff_of_ladder_addEquiv _ _ _ comm₁₂ comm₂₃).2 H
lemma of_ladder_addEquiv_of_exact' (comm₁₂ : g₁₂.comp e₁ = AddMonoidHom.comp e₂ f₁₂)
(comm₂₃ : g₂₃.comp e₂ = AddMonoidHom.comp e₃ f₂₃) (H : Exact g₁₂ g₂₃) : Exact f₁₂ f₂₃ :=
(iff_of_ladder_addEquiv _ _ _ comm₁₂ comm₂₃).1 H
end
/-- Two maps `f : M →+ N` and `g : N →+ P` are exact if and only if the induced maps
`AddMonoidHom.range f → N → AddMonoidHom.range g` are exact. -/
lemma iff_addMonoidHom_rangeRestrict :
Exact f g ↔ Exact f.range.subtype g.rangeRestrict :=
iff_rangeFactorization (zero_mem g.range)
alias ⟨addMonoidHom_rangeRestrict, _⟩ := iff_addMonoidHom_rangeRestrict
end Function.Exact
end AddMonoidHom
section LinearMap
open Function
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M'] [AddCommMonoid N]
[AddCommMonoid N'] [AddCommMonoid P] [AddCommMonoid P'] [Module R M]
[Module R M'] [Module R N] [Module R N'] [Module R P] [Module R P']
| variable {f : M →ₗ[R] N} {g : N →ₗ[R] P}
namespace LinearMap
lemma exact_iff :
Exact f g ↔ LinearMap.ker g = LinearMap.range f :=
Iff.symm SetLike.ext_iff
lemma exact_of_comp_eq_zero_of_ker_le_range
(h1 : g ∘ₗ f = 0) (h2 : ker g ≤ range f) : Exact f g :=
Exact.of_comp_of_mem_range (congrArg DFunLike.coe h1) h2
lemma exact_of_comp_of_mem_range
(h1 : g ∘ₗ f = 0) (h2 : ∀ x, g x = 0 → x ∈ range f) : Exact f g :=
exact_of_comp_eq_zero_of_ker_le_range h1 h2
section Ring
variable {R M N P : Type*} [Ring R]
[AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup N] [AddCommGroup P] [Module R M] [Module R N] [Module R P]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Exact.lean | 209 | 228 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov, Sébastien Gouëzel, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.FinMeasAdditive
/-!
# Extension of a linear function from indicators to L1
Given `T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` with `DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C`, we construct an extension
of `T` to integrable simple functions, which are finite sums of indicators of measurable sets
with finite measure, then to integrable functions, which are limits of integrable simple functions.
The main result is a continuous linear map `(α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F`.
This extension process is used to define the Bochner integral
in the `Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.Basic` file
and the conditional expectation of an integrable function
in `Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation.CondexpL1`.
## Main definitions
- `setToL1 (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F`: the extension of `T`
from indicators to L1.
- `setToFun μ T (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α → E) : F`: a version of the
extension which applies to functions (with value 0 if the function is not integrable).
## Properties
For most properties of `setToFun`, we provide two lemmas. One version uses hypotheses valid on
all sets, like `T = T'`, and a second version which uses a primed name uses hypotheses on
measurable sets with finite measure, like `∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s`.
The lemmas listed here don't show all hypotheses. Refer to the actual lemmas for details.
Linearity:
- `setToFun_zero_left : setToFun μ 0 hT f = 0`
- `setToFun_add_left : setToFun μ (T + T') _ f = setToFun μ T hT f + setToFun μ T' hT' f`
- `setToFun_smul_left : setToFun μ (fun s ↦ c • (T s)) (hT.smul c) f = c • setToFun μ T hT f`
- `setToFun_zero : setToFun μ T hT (0 : α → E) = 0`
- `setToFun_neg : setToFun μ T hT (-f) = - setToFun μ T hT f`
If `f` and `g` are integrable:
- `setToFun_add : setToFun μ T hT (f + g) = setToFun μ T hT f + setToFun μ T hT g`
- `setToFun_sub : setToFun μ T hT (f - g) = setToFun μ T hT f - setToFun μ T hT g`
If `T` is verifies `∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x`:
- `setToFun_smul : setToFun μ T hT (c • f) = c • setToFun μ T hT f`
Other:
- `setToFun_congr_ae (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : setToFun μ T hT f = setToFun μ T hT g`
- `setToFun_measure_zero (h : μ = 0) : setToFun μ T hT f = 0`
If the space is also an ordered additive group with an order closed topology and `T` is such that
`0 ≤ T s x` for `0 ≤ x`, we also prove order-related properties:
- `setToFun_mono_left (h : ∀ s x, T s x ≤ T' s x) : setToFun μ T hT f ≤ setToFun μ T' hT' f`
- `setToFun_nonneg (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) : 0 ≤ setToFun μ T hT f`
- `setToFun_mono (hfg : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) : setToFun μ T hT f ≤ setToFun μ T hT g`
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Topology NNReal
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace ENNReal
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α E F F' G 𝕜 : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] [NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace ℝ F']
[NormedAddCommGroup G] {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
namespace L1
open AEEqFun Lp.simpleFunc Lp
namespace SimpleFunc
theorem norm_eq_sum_mul (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] G) :
‖f‖ = ∑ x ∈ (toSimpleFunc f).range, μ.real (toSimpleFunc f ⁻¹' {x}) * ‖x‖ := by
rw [norm_toSimpleFunc, eLpNorm_one_eq_lintegral_enorm]
have h_eq := SimpleFunc.map_apply (‖·‖ₑ) (toSimpleFunc f)
simp_rw [← h_eq, measureReal_def]
rw [SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral, SimpleFunc.map_lintegral, ENNReal.toReal_sum]
· congr
ext1 x
rw [ENNReal.toReal_mul, mul_comm, ← ofReal_norm_eq_enorm,
ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (norm_nonneg _)]
· intro x _
by_cases hx0 : x = 0
· rw [hx0]; simp
· exact
ENNReal.mul_ne_top ENNReal.coe_ne_top
(SimpleFunc.measure_preimage_lt_top_of_integrable _ (SimpleFunc.integrable f) hx0).ne
section SetToL1S
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
attribute [local instance] Lp.simpleFunc.module
attribute [local instance] Lp.simpleFunc.normedSpace
/-- Extend `Set α → (E →L[ℝ] F')` to `(α →₁ₛ[μ] E) → F'`. -/
def setToL1S (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : F :=
(toSimpleFunc f).setToSimpleFunc T
theorem setToL1S_eq_setToSimpleFunc (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T f = (toSimpleFunc f).setToSimpleFunc T :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem setToL1S_zero_left (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S (0 : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) f = 0 :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_zero _
theorem setToL1S_zero_left' {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F}
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = 0) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T f = 0 :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_zero' h_zero _ (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_congr (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) {f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E} (h : toSimpleFunc f =ᵐ[μ] toSimpleFunc g) :
setToL1S T f = setToL1S T g :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f) h
theorem setToL1S_congr_left (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F)
(h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T f = setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr_left T T' h (simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f) (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
/-- `setToL1S` does not change if we replace the measure `μ` by `μ'` with `μ ≪ μ'`. The statement
uses two functions `f` and `f'` because they have to belong to different types, but morally these
are the same function (we have `f =ᵐ[μ] f'`). -/
theorem setToL1S_congr_measure {μ' : Measure α} (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0) (h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (hμ : μ ≪ μ')
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) (f' : α →₁ₛ[μ'] E) (h : (f : α → E) =ᵐ[μ] f') :
setToL1S T f = setToL1S T f' := by
refine SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f) ?_
refine (toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun f).trans ?_
suffices (f' : α → E) =ᵐ[μ] simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f' from h.trans this
have goal' : (f' : α → E) =ᵐ[μ'] simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f' := (toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun f').symm
exact hμ.ae_eq goal'
theorem setToL1S_add_left (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S (T + T') f = setToL1S T f + setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_add_left T T'
theorem setToL1S_add_left' (T T' T'' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F)
(h_add : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T'' s = T s + T' s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T'' f = setToL1S T f + setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_add_left' T T' T'' h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_smul_left (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (c : ℝ) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S (fun s => c • T s) f = c • setToL1S T f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_smul_left T c _
theorem setToL1S_smul_left' (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (c : ℝ)
(h_smul : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T' s = c • T s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T' f = c • setToL1S T f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_smul_left' T T' c h_smul (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_add (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T (f + g) = setToL1S T f + setToL1S T g := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
rw [← SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_add T h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
(SimpleFunc.integrable g)]
exact
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _)
(add_toSimpleFunc f g)
theorem setToL1S_neg {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T (-f) = -setToL1S T f := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
have : simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc (-f) =ᵐ[μ] ⇑(-simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f) :=
neg_toSimpleFunc f
rw [SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) this]
exact SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_neg T h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_sub {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T (f - g) = setToL1S T f - setToL1S T g := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, setToL1S_add T h_zero h_add, setToL1S_neg h_zero h_add, sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem setToL1S_smul_real (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0) (h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (c : ℝ)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T (c • f) = c • setToL1S T f := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
rw [← SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_smul_real T h_add c (SimpleFunc.integrable f)]
refine SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) ?_
exact smul_toSimpleFunc c f
theorem setToL1S_smul {E} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
[DistribSMul 𝕜 F] (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) (c : 𝕜)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T (c • f) = c • setToL1S T f := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
rw [← SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_smul T h_add h_smul c (SimpleFunc.integrable f)]
refine SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) ?_
exact smul_toSimpleFunc c f
theorem norm_setToL1S_le (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) {C : ℝ}
(hT_norm : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ‖T s‖ ≤ C * μ.real s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
‖setToL1S T f‖ ≤ C * ‖f‖ := by
rw [setToL1S, norm_eq_sum_mul f]
exact
SimpleFunc.norm_setToSimpleFunc_le_sum_mul_norm_of_integrable T hT_norm _
(SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_indicatorConst {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {s : Set α}
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0) (h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s < ∞) (x : E) :
setToL1S T (simpleFunc.indicatorConst 1 hs hμs.ne x) = T s x := by
have h_empty : T ∅ = 0 := h_zero _ MeasurableSet.empty measure_empty
rw [setToL1S_eq_setToSimpleFunc]
refine Eq.trans ?_ (SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_indicator T h_empty hs x)
refine SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) ?_
exact toSimpleFunc_indicatorConst hs hμs.ne x
theorem setToL1S_const [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F}
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0) (h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (x : E) :
setToL1S T (simpleFunc.indicatorConst 1 MeasurableSet.univ (measure_ne_top μ _) x) = T univ x :=
setToL1S_indicatorConst h_zero h_add MeasurableSet.univ (measure_lt_top _ _) x
section Order
variable {G'' G' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup G'] [PartialOrder G'] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G'] [NormedSpace ℝ G']
[NormedAddCommGroup G''] [PartialOrder G''] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G''] [NormedSpace ℝ G'']
{T : Set α → G'' →L[ℝ] G'}
theorem setToL1S_mono_left {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} (hTT' : ∀ s x, T s x ≤ T' s x)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T f ≤ setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_mono_left T T' hTT' _
theorem setToL1S_mono_left' {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''}
(hTT' : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T f ≤ setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_mono_left' T T' hTT' _ (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
omit [IsOrderedAddMonoid G''] in
theorem setToL1S_nonneg (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f : α →₁ₛ[μ] G''}
(hf : 0 ≤ f) : 0 ≤ setToL1S T f := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
obtain ⟨f', hf', hff'⟩ := exists_simpleFunc_nonneg_ae_eq hf
replace hff' : simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f =ᵐ[μ] f' :=
(Lp.simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun f).trans hff'
rw [SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr _ h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) hff']
exact
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_nonneg' T hT_nonneg _ hf' ((SimpleFunc.integrable f).congr hff')
theorem setToL1S_mono (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] G''}
(hfg : f ≤ g) : setToL1S T f ≤ setToL1S T g := by
rw [← sub_nonneg] at hfg ⊢
rw [← setToL1S_sub h_zero h_add]
exact setToL1S_nonneg h_zero h_add hT_nonneg hfg
end Order
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable (α E μ 𝕜)
/-- Extend `Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` to `(α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[𝕜] F`. -/
def setToL1SCLM' {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) : (α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[𝕜] F :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous
⟨⟨setToL1S T, setToL1S_add T (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1⟩,
setToL1S_smul T (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 h_smul⟩
C fun f => norm_setToL1S_le T hT.2 f
/-- Extend `Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` to `(α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F`. -/
def setToL1SCLM {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) :
(α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous
⟨⟨setToL1S T, setToL1S_add T (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1⟩,
setToL1S_smul_real T (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1⟩
C fun f => norm_setToL1S_le T hT.2 f
variable {α E μ 𝕜}
variable {T T' T'' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C C' C'' : ℝ}
@[simp]
theorem setToL1SCLM_zero_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ (0 : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) C)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f = 0 :=
setToL1S_zero_left _
theorem setToL1SCLM_zero_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = 0) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f = 0 :=
setToL1S_zero_left' h_zero f
theorem setToL1SCLM_congr_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (h : T = T') (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
setToL1S_congr_left T T' (fun _ _ _ => by rw [h]) f
theorem setToL1SCLM_congr_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
setToL1S_congr_left T T' h f
theorem setToL1SCLM_congr_measure {μ' : Measure α} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ' T C') (hμ : μ ≪ μ') (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) (f' : α →₁ₛ[μ'] E)
(h : (f : α → E) =ᵐ[μ] f') : setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ' hT' f' :=
setToL1S_congr_measure T (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 hμ _ _ h
theorem setToL1SCLM_add_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.add hT') f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f + setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
setToL1S_add_left T T' f
theorem setToL1SCLM_add_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (hT'' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T'' C'')
(h_add : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T'' s = T s + T' s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT'' f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f + setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
setToL1S_add_left' T T' T'' h_add f
theorem setToL1SCLM_smul_left (c : ℝ) (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.smul c) f = c • setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f :=
setToL1S_smul_left T c f
theorem setToL1SCLM_smul_left' (c : ℝ) (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(h_smul : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T' s = c • T s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f = c • setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f :=
setToL1S_smul_left' T T' c h_smul f
theorem norm_setToL1SCLM_le {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hC : 0 ≤ C) : ‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ ≤ C :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ hC _
theorem norm_setToL1SCLM_le' {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) :
‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ ≤ max C 0 :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le' _ _
theorem setToL1SCLM_const [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (x : E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT (simpleFunc.indicatorConst 1 MeasurableSet.univ (measure_ne_top μ _) x) =
T univ x :=
setToL1S_const (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 x
section Order
variable {G' G'' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup G''] [PartialOrder G''] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G''] [NormedSpace ℝ G'']
[NormedAddCommGroup G'] [PartialOrder G'] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G'] [NormedSpace ℝ G']
theorem setToL1SCLM_mono_left {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(hTT' : ∀ s x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f ≤ setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_mono_left T T' hTT' _
theorem setToL1SCLM_mono_left' {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(hTT' : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f ≤ setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_mono_left' T T' hTT' _ (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
omit [IsOrderedAddMonoid G'] in
theorem setToL1SCLM_nonneg {T : Set α → G' →L[ℝ] G''} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f : α →₁ₛ[μ] G'}
(hf : 0 ≤ f) : 0 ≤ setToL1SCLM α G' μ hT f :=
setToL1S_nonneg (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 hT_nonneg hf
theorem setToL1SCLM_mono {T : Set α → G' →L[ℝ] G''} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] G'}
(hfg : f ≤ g) : setToL1SCLM α G' μ hT f ≤ setToL1SCLM α G' μ hT g :=
setToL1S_mono (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 hT_nonneg hfg
end Order
end SetToL1S
end SimpleFunc
open SimpleFunc
section SetToL1
attribute [local instance] Lp.simpleFunc.module
attribute [local instance] Lp.simpleFunc.normedSpace
variable (𝕜) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [CompleteSpace F]
{T T' T'' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C C' C'' : ℝ}
/-- Extend `Set α → (E →L[ℝ] F)` to `(α →₁[μ] E) →L[𝕜] F`. -/
def setToL1' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[𝕜] F :=
(setToL1SCLM' α E 𝕜 μ hT h_smul).extend (coeToLp α E 𝕜) (simpleFunc.denseRange one_ne_top)
simpleFunc.isUniformInducing
variable {𝕜}
/-- Extend `Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` to `(α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F`. -/
def setToL1 (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F :=
(setToL1SCLM α E μ hT).extend (coeToLp α E ℝ) (simpleFunc.denseRange one_ne_top)
simpleFunc.isUniformInducing
theorem setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f :=
uniformly_extend_of_ind simpleFunc.isUniformInducing (simpleFunc.denseRange one_ne_top)
(setToL1SCLM α E μ hT).uniformContinuous _
theorem setToL1_eq_setToL1' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT f = setToL1' 𝕜 hT h_smul f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem setToL1_zero_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ (0 : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) C)
(f : α →₁[μ] E) : setToL1 hT f = 0 := by
suffices setToL1 hT = 0 by rw [this]; simp
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
rw [setToL1SCLM_zero_left hT f, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_comp, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_apply]
theorem setToL1_zero_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = 0) (f : α →₁[μ] E) : setToL1 hT f = 0 := by
suffices setToL1 hT = 0 by rw [this]; simp
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
rw [setToL1SCLM_zero_left' hT h_zero f, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_comp,
ContinuousLinearMap.zero_apply]
theorem setToL1_congr_left (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (h : T = T')
(f : α →₁[μ] E) : setToL1 hT f = setToL1 hT' f := by
suffices setToL1 hT = setToL1 hT' by rw [this]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices setToL1 hT' f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f by rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM]
exact setToL1SCLM_congr_left hT' hT h.symm f
theorem setToL1_congr_left' (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT f = setToL1 hT' f := by
suffices setToL1 hT = setToL1 hT' by rw [this]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices setToL1 hT' f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f by rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM]
exact (setToL1SCLM_congr_left' hT hT' h f).symm
theorem setToL1_add_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 (hT.add hT') f = setToL1 hT f + setToL1 hT' f := by
suffices setToL1 (hT.add hT') = setToL1 hT + setToL1 hT' by
rw [this, ContinuousLinearMap.add_apply]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.add hT')) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices setToL1 hT f + setToL1 hT' f = setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.add hT') f by
rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM, setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM, setToL1SCLM_add_left hT hT']
theorem setToL1_add_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (hT'' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T'' C'')
(h_add : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T'' s = T s + T' s) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT'' f = setToL1 hT f + setToL1 hT' f := by
suffices setToL1 hT'' = setToL1 hT + setToL1 hT' by rw [this, ContinuousLinearMap.add_apply]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT'') _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices setToL1 hT f + setToL1 hT' f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT'' f by rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM, setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM,
setToL1SCLM_add_left' hT hT' hT'' h_add]
theorem setToL1_smul_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (c : ℝ) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 (hT.smul c) f = c • setToL1 hT f := by
suffices setToL1 (hT.smul c) = c • setToL1 hT by rw [this, ContinuousLinearMap.smul_apply]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.smul c)) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices c • setToL1 hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.smul c) f by rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM, setToL1SCLM_smul_left c hT]
theorem setToL1_smul_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (c : ℝ)
(h_smul : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T' s = c • T s) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT' f = c • setToL1 hT f := by
suffices setToL1 hT' = c • setToL1 hT by rw [this, ContinuousLinearMap.smul_apply]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT') _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices c • setToL1 hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f by rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM, setToL1SCLM_smul_left' c hT hT' h_smul]
theorem setToL1_smul (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) (c : 𝕜) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT (c • f) = c • setToL1 hT f := by
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1' hT h_smul, setToL1_eq_setToL1' hT h_smul]
exact ContinuousLinearMap.map_smul _ _ _
theorem setToL1_simpleFunc_indicatorConst (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s < ∞) (x : E) :
setToL1 hT (simpleFunc.indicatorConst 1 hs hμs.ne x) = T s x := by
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM]
exact setToL1S_indicatorConst (fun s => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 hs hμs x
theorem setToL1_indicatorConstLp (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (x : E) :
setToL1 hT (indicatorConstLp 1 hs hμs x) = T s x := by
rw [← Lp.simpleFunc.coe_indicatorConst hs hμs x]
exact setToL1_simpleFunc_indicatorConst hT hs hμs.lt_top x
theorem setToL1_const [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (x : E) :
setToL1 hT (indicatorConstLp 1 MeasurableSet.univ (measure_ne_top _ _) x) = T univ x :=
setToL1_indicatorConstLp hT MeasurableSet.univ (measure_ne_top _ _) x
section Order
variable {G' G'' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup G''] [PartialOrder G''] [OrderClosedTopology G''] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G'']
[NormedSpace ℝ G''] [CompleteSpace G'']
[NormedAddCommGroup G'] [PartialOrder G'] [NormedSpace ℝ G']
theorem setToL1_mono_left' {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(hTT' : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT f ≤ setToL1 hT' f := by
induction f using Lp.induction (hp_ne_top := one_ne_top) with
| @indicatorConst c s hs hμs =>
rw [setToL1_simpleFunc_indicatorConst hT hs hμs, setToL1_simpleFunc_indicatorConst hT' hs hμs]
exact hTT' s hs hμs c
| @add f g hf hg _ hf_le hg_le =>
rw [(setToL1 hT).map_add, (setToL1 hT').map_add]
exact add_le_add hf_le hg_le
| isClosed => exact isClosed_le (setToL1 hT).continuous (setToL1 hT').continuous
theorem setToL1_mono_left {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(hTT' : ∀ s x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α →₁[μ] E) : setToL1 hT f ≤ setToL1 hT' f :=
setToL1_mono_left' hT hT' (fun s _ _ x => hTT' s x) f
theorem setToL1_nonneg {T : Set α → G' →L[ℝ] G''} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f : α →₁[μ] G'}
(hf : 0 ≤ f) : 0 ≤ setToL1 hT f := by
suffices ∀ f : { g : α →₁[μ] G' // 0 ≤ g }, 0 ≤ setToL1 hT f from
this (⟨f, hf⟩ : { g : α →₁[μ] G' // 0 ≤ g })
refine fun g =>
@isClosed_property { g : α →₁ₛ[μ] G' // 0 ≤ g } { g : α →₁[μ] G' // 0 ≤ g } _ _
(fun g => 0 ≤ setToL1 hT g)
(denseRange_coeSimpleFuncNonnegToLpNonneg 1 μ G' one_ne_top) ?_ ?_ g
· exact isClosed_le continuous_zero ((setToL1 hT).continuous.comp continuous_induced_dom)
· intro g
have : (coeSimpleFuncNonnegToLpNonneg 1 μ G' g : α →₁[μ] G') = (g : α →₁ₛ[μ] G') := rfl
rw [this, setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM]
exact setToL1S_nonneg (fun s => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 hT_nonneg g.2
theorem setToL1_mono [IsOrderedAddMonoid G']
{T : Set α → G' →L[ℝ] G''} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f g : α →₁[μ] G'}
(hfg : f ≤ g) : setToL1 hT f ≤ setToL1 hT g := by
rw [← sub_nonneg] at hfg ⊢
rw [← (setToL1 hT).map_sub]
exact setToL1_nonneg hT hT_nonneg hfg
end Order
theorem norm_setToL1_le_norm_setToL1SCLM (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) :
‖setToL1 hT‖ ≤ ‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ :=
calc
‖setToL1 hT‖ ≤ (1 : ℝ≥0) * ‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ := by
refine
ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_extend_le (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT) (coeToLp α E ℝ)
(simpleFunc.denseRange one_ne_top) fun x => le_of_eq ?_
rw [NNReal.coe_one, one_mul]
simp [coeToLp]
_ = ‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ := by rw [NNReal.coe_one, one_mul]
theorem norm_setToL1_le_mul_norm (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hC : 0 ≤ C)
(f : α →₁[μ] E) : ‖setToL1 hT f‖ ≤ C * ‖f‖ :=
calc
‖setToL1 hT f‖ ≤ ‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ * ‖f‖ :=
ContinuousLinearMap.le_of_opNorm_le _ (norm_setToL1_le_norm_setToL1SCLM hT) _
_ ≤ C * ‖f‖ := mul_le_mul (norm_setToL1SCLM_le hT hC) le_rfl (norm_nonneg _) hC
theorem norm_setToL1_le_mul_norm' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
‖setToL1 hT f‖ ≤ max C 0 * ‖f‖ :=
calc
‖setToL1 hT f‖ ≤ ‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ * ‖f‖ :=
ContinuousLinearMap.le_of_opNorm_le _ (norm_setToL1_le_norm_setToL1SCLM hT) _
_ ≤ max C 0 * ‖f‖ :=
mul_le_mul (norm_setToL1SCLM_le' hT) le_rfl (norm_nonneg _) (le_max_right _ _)
theorem norm_setToL1_le (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hC : 0 ≤ C) : ‖setToL1 hT‖ ≤ C :=
ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_le_bound _ hC (norm_setToL1_le_mul_norm hT hC)
theorem norm_setToL1_le' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) : ‖setToL1 hT‖ ≤ max C 0 :=
ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_le_bound _ (le_max_right _ _) (norm_setToL1_le_mul_norm' hT)
theorem setToL1_lipschitz (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) :
LipschitzWith (Real.toNNReal C) (setToL1 hT) :=
(setToL1 hT).lipschitz.weaken (norm_setToL1_le' hT)
/-- If `fs i → f` in `L1`, then `setToL1 hT (fs i) → setToL1 hT f`. -/
theorem tendsto_setToL1 (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α →₁[μ] E) {ι}
(fs : ι → α →₁[μ] E) {l : Filter ι} (hfs : Tendsto fs l (𝓝 f)) :
Tendsto (fun i => setToL1 hT (fs i)) l (𝓝 <| setToL1 hT f) :=
((setToL1 hT).continuous.tendsto _).comp hfs
end SetToL1
end L1
section Function
variable [CompleteSpace F] {T T' T'' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C C' C'' : ℝ} {f g : α → E}
variable (μ T)
open Classical in
/-- Extend `T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` to `(α → E) → F` (for integrable functions `α → E`). We set it to
0 if the function is not integrable. -/
def setToFun (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α → E) : F :=
if hf : Integrable f μ then L1.setToL1 hT (hf.toL1 f) else 0
variable {μ T}
theorem setToFun_eq (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hf : Integrable f μ) :
setToFun μ T hT f = L1.setToL1 hT (hf.toL1 f) :=
dif_pos hf
theorem L1.setToFun_eq_setToL1 (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToFun μ T hT f = L1.setToL1 hT f := by
rw [setToFun_eq hT (L1.integrable_coeFn f), Integrable.toL1_coeFn]
theorem setToFun_undef (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hf : ¬Integrable f μ) :
setToFun μ T hT f = 0 :=
dif_neg hf
theorem setToFun_non_aestronglyMeasurable (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hf : ¬AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) : setToFun μ T hT f = 0 :=
setToFun_undef hT (not_and_of_not_left _ hf)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-09")]
alias setToFun_non_aEStronglyMeasurable := setToFun_non_aestronglyMeasurable
theorem setToFun_congr_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (h : T = T') (f : α → E) :
setToFun μ T hT f = setToFun μ T' hT' f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· simp_rw [setToFun_eq _ hf, L1.setToL1_congr_left T T' hT hT' h]
· simp_rw [setToFun_undef _ hf]
theorem setToFun_congr_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s)
(f : α → E) : setToFun μ T hT f = setToFun μ T' hT' f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· simp_rw [setToFun_eq _ hf, L1.setToL1_congr_left' T T' hT hT' h]
· simp_rw [setToFun_undef _ hf]
theorem setToFun_add_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (f : α → E) :
setToFun μ (T + T') (hT.add hT') f = setToFun μ T hT f + setToFun μ T' hT' f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· simp_rw [setToFun_eq _ hf, L1.setToL1_add_left hT hT']
· simp_rw [setToFun_undef _ hf, add_zero]
theorem setToFun_add_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (hT'' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T'' C'')
(h_add : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T'' s = T s + T' s) (f : α → E) :
setToFun μ T'' hT'' f = setToFun μ T hT f + setToFun μ T' hT' f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· simp_rw [setToFun_eq _ hf, L1.setToL1_add_left' hT hT' hT'' h_add]
· simp_rw [setToFun_undef _ hf, add_zero]
theorem setToFun_smul_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (c : ℝ) (f : α → E) :
setToFun μ (fun s => c • T s) (hT.smul c) f = c • setToFun μ T hT f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· simp_rw [setToFun_eq _ hf, L1.setToL1_smul_left hT c]
· simp_rw [setToFun_undef _ hf, smul_zero]
theorem setToFun_smul_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (c : ℝ)
(h_smul : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T' s = c • T s) (f : α → E) :
setToFun μ T' hT' f = c • setToFun μ T hT f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· simp_rw [setToFun_eq _ hf, L1.setToL1_smul_left' hT hT' c h_smul]
· simp_rw [setToFun_undef _ hf, smul_zero]
@[simp]
theorem setToFun_zero (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) : setToFun μ T hT (0 : α → E) = 0 := by
rw [Pi.zero_def, setToFun_eq hT (integrable_zero _ _ _)]
simp only [← Pi.zero_def]
rw [Integrable.toL1_zero, ContinuousLinearMap.map_zero]
@[simp]
theorem setToFun_zero_left {hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ (0 : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) C} :
setToFun μ 0 hT f = 0 := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· rw [setToFun_eq hT hf]; exact L1.setToL1_zero_left hT _
· exact setToFun_undef hT hf
theorem setToFun_zero_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = 0) : setToFun μ T hT f = 0 := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· rw [setToFun_eq hT hf]; exact L1.setToL1_zero_left' hT h_zero _
· exact setToFun_undef hT hf
theorem setToFun_add (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hf : Integrable f μ)
(hg : Integrable g μ) : setToFun μ T hT (f + g) = setToFun μ T hT f + setToFun μ T hT g := by
rw [setToFun_eq hT (hf.add hg), setToFun_eq hT hf, setToFun_eq hT hg, Integrable.toL1_add,
(L1.setToL1 hT).map_add]
theorem setToFun_finset_sum' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {ι} (s : Finset ι)
{f : ι → α → E} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, Integrable (f i) μ) :
setToFun μ T hT (∑ i ∈ s, f i) = ∑ i ∈ s, setToFun μ T hT (f i) := by
classical
revert hf
refine Finset.induction_on s ?_ ?_
· intro _
simp only [setToFun_zero, Finset.sum_empty]
· intro i s his ih hf
simp only [his, Finset.sum_insert, not_false_iff]
rw [setToFun_add hT (hf i (Finset.mem_insert_self i s)) _]
· rw [ih fun i hi => hf i (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)]
· convert integrable_finset_sum s fun i hi => hf i (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi) with x
simp
theorem setToFun_finset_sum (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {ι} (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → α → E}
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, Integrable (f i) μ) :
(setToFun μ T hT fun a => ∑ i ∈ s, f i a) = ∑ i ∈ s, setToFun μ T hT (f i) := by
convert setToFun_finset_sum' hT s hf with a; simp
theorem setToFun_neg (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α → E) :
setToFun μ T hT (-f) = -setToFun μ T hT f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· rw [setToFun_eq hT hf, setToFun_eq hT hf.neg, Integrable.toL1_neg,
(L1.setToL1 hT).map_neg]
· rw [setToFun_undef hT hf, setToFun_undef hT, neg_zero]
rwa [← integrable_neg_iff] at hf
theorem setToFun_sub (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hf : Integrable f μ)
(hg : Integrable g μ) : setToFun μ T hT (f - g) = setToFun μ T hT f - setToFun μ T hT g := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, setToFun_add hT hf hg.neg, setToFun_neg hT g]
theorem setToFun_smul [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) (c : 𝕜)
(f : α → E) : setToFun μ T hT (c • f) = c • setToFun μ T hT f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· rw [setToFun_eq hT hf, setToFun_eq hT, Integrable.toL1_smul',
L1.setToL1_smul hT h_smul c _]
· by_cases hr : c = 0
· rw [hr]; simp
· have hf' : ¬Integrable (c • f) μ := by rwa [integrable_smul_iff hr f]
rw [setToFun_undef hT hf, setToFun_undef hT hf', smul_zero]
theorem setToFun_congr_ae (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
setToFun μ T hT f = setToFun μ T hT g := by
by_cases hfi : Integrable f μ
· have hgi : Integrable g μ := hfi.congr h
rw [setToFun_eq hT hfi, setToFun_eq hT hgi, (Integrable.toL1_eq_toL1_iff f g hfi hgi).2 h]
· have hgi : ¬Integrable g μ := by rw [integrable_congr h] at hfi; exact hfi
rw [setToFun_undef hT hfi, setToFun_undef hT hgi]
theorem setToFun_measure_zero (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (h : μ = 0) :
setToFun μ T hT f = 0 := by
have : f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by simp [h, EventuallyEq]
rw [setToFun_congr_ae hT this, setToFun_zero]
theorem setToFun_measure_zero' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → μ s = 0) : setToFun μ T hT f = 0 :=
setToFun_zero_left' hT fun s hs hμs => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero hs (h s hs hμs)
theorem setToFun_toL1 (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hf : Integrable f μ) :
setToFun μ T hT (hf.toL1 f) = setToFun μ T hT f :=
setToFun_congr_ae hT hf.coeFn_toL1
theorem setToFun_indicator_const (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (x : E) :
setToFun μ T hT (s.indicator fun _ => x) = T s x := by
rw [setToFun_congr_ae hT (@indicatorConstLp_coeFn _ _ _ 1 _ _ _ hs hμs x).symm]
rw [L1.setToFun_eq_setToL1 hT]
exact L1.setToL1_indicatorConstLp hT hs hμs x
theorem setToFun_const [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (x : E) :
(setToFun μ T hT fun _ => x) = T univ x := by
have : (fun _ : α => x) = Set.indicator univ fun _ => x := (indicator_univ _).symm
rw [this]
exact setToFun_indicator_const hT MeasurableSet.univ (measure_ne_top _ _) x
section Order
variable {G' G'' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup G''] [PartialOrder G''] [OrderClosedTopology G''] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G'']
[NormedSpace ℝ G''] [CompleteSpace G'']
[NormedAddCommGroup G'] [PartialOrder G'] [NormedSpace ℝ G']
theorem setToFun_mono_left' {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(hTT' : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α → E) :
setToFun μ T hT f ≤ setToFun μ T' hT' f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· simp_rw [setToFun_eq _ hf]; exact L1.setToL1_mono_left' hT hT' hTT' _
· simp_rw [setToFun_undef _ hf, le_rfl]
theorem setToFun_mono_left {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(hTT' : ∀ s x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α →₁[μ] E) : setToFun μ T hT f ≤ setToFun μ T' hT' f :=
setToFun_mono_left' hT hT' (fun s _ _ x => hTT' s x) f
theorem setToFun_nonneg {T : Set α → G' →L[ℝ] G''} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f : α → G'}
(hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) : 0 ≤ setToFun μ T hT f := by
by_cases hfi : Integrable f μ
· simp_rw [setToFun_eq _ hfi]
refine L1.setToL1_nonneg hT hT_nonneg ?_
rw [← Lp.coeFn_le]
have h0 := Lp.coeFn_zero G' 1 μ
have h := Integrable.coeFn_toL1 hfi
filter_upwards [h0, h, hf] with _ h0a ha hfa
rw [h0a, ha]
exact hfa
· simp_rw [setToFun_undef _ hfi, le_rfl]
theorem setToFun_mono [IsOrderedAddMonoid G']
{T : Set α → G' →L[ℝ] G''} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f g : α → G'}
(hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) (hfg : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) :
setToFun μ T hT f ≤ setToFun μ T hT g := by
rw [← sub_nonneg, ← setToFun_sub hT hg hf]
refine setToFun_nonneg hT hT_nonneg (hfg.mono fun a ha => ?_)
rw [Pi.sub_apply, Pi.zero_apply, sub_nonneg]
exact ha
end Order
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_setToFun (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) :
Continuous fun f : α →₁[μ] E => setToFun μ T hT f := by
simp_rw [L1.setToFun_eq_setToL1 hT]; exact ContinuousLinearMap.continuous _
/-- If `F i → f` in `L1`, then `setToFun μ T hT (F i) → setToFun μ T hT f`. -/
theorem tendsto_setToFun_of_L1 (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {ι} (f : α → E)
(hfi : Integrable f μ) {fs : ι → α → E} {l : Filter ι} (hfsi : ∀ᶠ i in l, Integrable (fs i) μ)
(hfs : Tendsto (fun i => ∫⁻ x, ‖fs i x - f x‖ₑ ∂μ) l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto (fun i => setToFun μ T hT (fs i)) l (𝓝 <| setToFun μ T hT f) := by
classical
let f_lp := hfi.toL1 f
let F_lp i := if hFi : Integrable (fs i) μ then hFi.toL1 (fs i) else 0
have tendsto_L1 : Tendsto F_lp l (𝓝 f_lp) := by
rw [Lp.tendsto_Lp_iff_tendsto_eLpNorm']
simp_rw [eLpNorm_one_eq_lintegral_enorm, Pi.sub_apply]
refine (tendsto_congr' ?_).mp hfs
filter_upwards [hfsi] with i hi
refine lintegral_congr_ae ?_
filter_upwards [hi.coeFn_toL1, hfi.coeFn_toL1] with x hxi hxf
simp_rw [F_lp, dif_pos hi, hxi, f_lp, hxf]
suffices Tendsto (fun i => setToFun μ T hT (F_lp i)) l (𝓝 (setToFun μ T hT f)) by
refine (tendsto_congr' ?_).mp this
filter_upwards [hfsi] with i hi
suffices h_ae_eq : F_lp i =ᵐ[μ] fs i from setToFun_congr_ae hT h_ae_eq
simp_rw [F_lp, dif_pos hi]
exact hi.coeFn_toL1
rw [setToFun_congr_ae hT hfi.coeFn_toL1.symm]
exact ((continuous_setToFun hT).tendsto f_lp).comp tendsto_L1
theorem tendsto_setToFun_approxOn_of_measurable (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] {f : α → E} {s : Set E} [SeparableSpace s]
(hfi : Integrable f μ) (hfm : Measurable f) (hs : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ∈ closure s) {y₀ : E}
(h₀ : y₀ ∈ s) (h₀i : Integrable (fun _ => y₀) μ) :
Tendsto (fun n => setToFun μ T hT (SimpleFunc.approxOn f hfm s y₀ h₀ n)) atTop
(𝓝 <| setToFun μ T hT f) :=
tendsto_setToFun_of_L1 hT _ hfi
(Eventually.of_forall (SimpleFunc.integrable_approxOn hfm hfi h₀ h₀i))
(SimpleFunc.tendsto_approxOn_L1_enorm hfm _ hs (hfi.sub h₀i).2)
theorem tendsto_setToFun_approxOn_of_measurable_of_range_subset
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] {f : α → E}
(fmeas : Measurable f) (hf : Integrable f μ) (s : Set E) [SeparableSpace s]
(hs : range f ∪ {0} ⊆ s) :
Tendsto (fun n => setToFun μ T hT (SimpleFunc.approxOn f fmeas s 0 (hs <| by simp) n)) atTop
(𝓝 <| setToFun μ T hT f) := by
refine tendsto_setToFun_approxOn_of_measurable hT hf fmeas ?_ _ (integrable_zero _ _ _)
exact Eventually.of_forall fun x => subset_closure (hs (Set.mem_union_left _ (mem_range_self _)))
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `setToFun_congr_measure`: the function sending `f : α →₁[μ] G` to
`f : α →₁[μ'] G` is continuous when `μ' ≤ c' • μ` for `c' ≠ ∞`. -/
theorem continuous_L1_toL1 {μ' : Measure α} (c' : ℝ≥0∞) (hc' : c' ≠ ∞) (hμ'_le : μ' ≤ c' • μ) :
Continuous fun f : α →₁[μ] G =>
(Integrable.of_measure_le_smul hc' hμ'_le (L1.integrable_coeFn f)).toL1 f := by
by_cases hc'0 : c' = 0
· have hμ'0 : μ' = 0 := by rw [← Measure.nonpos_iff_eq_zero']; refine hμ'_le.trans ?_; simp [hc'0]
have h_im_zero :
(fun f : α →₁[μ] G =>
(Integrable.of_measure_le_smul hc' hμ'_le (L1.integrable_coeFn f)).toL1 f) =
0 := by
ext1 f; ext1; simp_rw [hμ'0]; simp only [ae_zero, EventuallyEq, eventually_bot]
rw [h_im_zero]
exact continuous_zero
rw [Metric.continuous_iff]
intro f ε hε_pos
use ε / 2 / c'.toReal
refine ⟨div_pos (half_pos hε_pos) (toReal_pos hc'0 hc'), ?_⟩
intro g hfg
rw [Lp.dist_def] at hfg ⊢
let h_int := fun f' : α →₁[μ] G => (L1.integrable_coeFn f').of_measure_le_smul hc' hμ'_le
have :
| eLpNorm (⇑(Integrable.toL1 g (h_int g)) - ⇑(Integrable.toL1 f (h_int f))) 1 μ' =
eLpNorm (⇑g - ⇑f) 1 μ' :=
eLpNorm_congr_ae ((Integrable.coeFn_toL1 _).sub (Integrable.coeFn_toL1 _))
rw [this]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/SetToL1.lean | 901 | 904 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 David Kurniadi Angdinata. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Kurniadi Angdinata
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Bivariate
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.EllipticCurve.Weierstrass
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.EllipticCurve.VariableChange
/-!
# Affine coordinates for Weierstrass curves
This file defines the type of points on a Weierstrass curve as an inductive, consisting of the point
at infinity and affine points satisfying a Weierstrass equation with a nonsingular condition. This
file also defines the negation and addition operations of the group law for this type, and proves
that they respect the Weierstrass equation and the nonsingular condition. The fact that they form an
abelian group is proven in `Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/EllipticCurve/Group.lean`.
## Mathematical background
Let `W` be a Weierstrass curve over a field `F` with coefficients `aᵢ`. An *affine point*
on `W` is a tuple `(x, y)` of elements in `R` satisfying the *Weierstrass equation* `W(X, Y) = 0` in
*affine coordinates*, where `W(X, Y) := Y² + a₁XY + a₃Y - (X³ + a₂X² + a₄X + a₆)`. It is
*nonsingular* if its partial derivatives `W_X(x, y)` and `W_Y(x, y)` do not vanish simultaneously.
The nonsingular affine points on `W` can be given negation and addition operations defined by a
secant-and-tangent process.
* Given a nonsingular affine point `P`, its *negation* `-P` is defined to be the unique third
nonsingular point of intersection between `W` and the vertical line through `P`.
Explicitly, if `P` is `(x, y)`, then `-P` is `(x, -y - a₁x - a₃)`.
* Given two nonsingular affine points `P` and `Q`, their *addition* `P + Q` is defined to be the
negation of the unique third nonsingular point of intersection between `W` and the line `L`
through `P` and `Q`. Explicitly, let `P` be `(x₁, y₁)` and let `Q` be `(x₂, y₂)`.
* If `x₁ = x₂` and `y₁ = -y₂ - a₁x₂ - a₃`, then `L` is vertical.
* If `x₁ = x₂` and `y₁ ≠ -y₂ - a₁x₂ - a₃`, then `L` is the tangent of `W` at `P = Q`, and has
slope `ℓ := (3x₁² + 2a₂x₁ + a₄ - a₁y₁) / (2y₁ + a₁x₁ + a₃)`.
* Otherwise `x₁ ≠ x₂`, then `L` is the secant of `W` through `P` and `Q`, and has slope
`ℓ := (y₁ - y₂) / (x₁ - x₂)`.
In the last two cases, the `X`-coordinate of `P + Q` is then the unique third solution of the
equation obtained by substituting the line `Y = ℓ(X - x₁) + y₁` into the Weierstrass equation,
and can be written down explicitly as `x := ℓ² + a₁ℓ - a₂ - x₁ - x₂` by inspecting the
coefficients of `X²`. The `Y`-coordinate of `P + Q`, after applying the final negation that maps
`Y` to `-Y - a₁X - a₃`, is precisely `y := -(ℓ(x - x₁) + y₁) - a₁x - a₃`.
The type of nonsingular points `W⟮F⟯` in affine coordinates is an inductive, consisting of the
unique point at infinity `𝓞` and nonsingular affine points `(x, y)`. Then `W⟮F⟯` can be endowed with
a group law, with `𝓞` as the identity nonsingular point, which is uniquely determined by these
formulae.
## Main definitions
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.Equation`: the Weierstrass equation of an affine Weierstrass curve.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.Nonsingular`: the nonsingular condition on an affine Weierstrass curve.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.Point`: a nonsingular rational point on an affine Weierstrass curve.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.Point.neg`: the negation operation on an affine Weierstrass curve.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.Point.add`: the addition operation on an affine Weierstrass curve.
## Main statements
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.equation_neg`: negation preserves the Weierstrass equation.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.equation_add`: addition preserves the Weierstrass equation.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.nonsingular_neg`: negation preserves the nonsingular condition.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.nonsingular_add`: addition preserves the nonsingular condition.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.nonsingular_of_Δ_ne_zero`: an affine Weierstrass curve is nonsingular at
every point if its discriminant is non-zero.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.nonsingular`: an affine elliptic curve is nonsingular at every point.
## Notations
* `W⟮K⟯`: the group of nonsingular rational points on `W` base changed to `K`.
## References
[J Silverman, *The Arithmetic of Elliptic Curves*][silverman2009]
## Tags
elliptic curve, rational point, affine coordinates
-/
open Polynomial
open scoped Polynomial.Bivariate
local macro "C_simp" : tactic =>
`(tactic| simp only [map_ofNat, C_0, C_1, C_neg, C_add, C_sub, C_mul, C_pow])
local macro "derivative_simp" : tactic =>
`(tactic| simp only [derivative_C, derivative_X, derivative_X_pow, derivative_neg, derivative_add,
derivative_sub, derivative_mul, derivative_sq])
local macro "eval_simp" : tactic =>
`(tactic| simp only [eval_C, eval_X, eval_neg, eval_add, eval_sub, eval_mul, eval_pow, evalEval])
local macro "map_simp" : tactic =>
`(tactic| simp only [map_ofNat, map_neg, map_add, map_sub, map_mul, map_pow, map_div₀,
Polynomial.map_ofNat, map_C, map_X, Polynomial.map_neg, Polynomial.map_add, Polynomial.map_sub,
Polynomial.map_mul, Polynomial.map_pow, Polynomial.map_div, coe_mapRingHom,
WeierstrassCurve.map])
universe r s u v w
/-! ## Weierstrass curves -/
namespace WeierstrassCurve
variable {R : Type r} {S : Type s} {A F : Type u} {B K : Type v} {L : Type w}
variable (R) in
/-- An abbreviation for a Weierstrass curve in affine coordinates. -/
abbrev Affine : Type r :=
WeierstrassCurve R
/-- The conversion from a Weierstrass curve to affine coordinates. -/
abbrev toAffine (W : WeierstrassCurve R) : Affine R :=
W
namespace Affine
variable [CommRing R] [CommRing S] [CommRing A] [CommRing B] [Field F] [Field K] [Field L]
{W' : Affine R} {W : Affine F}
section Equation
/-! ### Weierstrass equations -/
variable (W') in
/-- The polynomial `W(X, Y) := Y² + a₁XY + a₃Y - (X³ + a₂X² + a₄X + a₆)` associated to a Weierstrass
curve `W` over a ring `R` in affine coordinates.
For ease of polynomial manipulation, this is represented as a term of type `R[X][X]`, where the
inner variable represents `X` and the outer variable represents `Y`. For clarity, the alternative
notations `Y` and `R[X][Y]` are provided in the `Polynomial.Bivariate` scope to represent the outer
variable and the bivariate polynomial ring `R[X][X]` respectively. -/
noncomputable def polynomial : R[X][Y] :=
Y ^ 2 + C (C W'.a₁ * X + C W'.a₃) * Y - C (X ^ 3 + C W'.a₂ * X ^ 2 + C W'.a₄ * X + C W'.a₆)
lemma polynomial_eq : W'.polynomial = Cubic.toPoly
⟨0, 1, Cubic.toPoly ⟨0, 0, W'.a₁, W'.a₃⟩, Cubic.toPoly ⟨-1, -W'.a₂, -W'.a₄, -W'.a₆⟩⟩ := by
simp only [polynomial, Cubic.toPoly]
C_simp
ring1
lemma polynomial_ne_zero [Nontrivial R] : W'.polynomial ≠ 0 := by
rw [polynomial_eq]
exact Cubic.ne_zero_of_b_ne_zero one_ne_zero
@[simp]
lemma degree_polynomial [Nontrivial R] : W'.polynomial.degree = 2 := by
rw [polynomial_eq]
exact Cubic.degree_of_b_ne_zero' one_ne_zero
@[simp]
lemma natDegree_polynomial [Nontrivial R] : W'.polynomial.natDegree = 2 := by
rw [polynomial_eq]
exact Cubic.natDegree_of_b_ne_zero' one_ne_zero
lemma monic_polynomial : W'.polynomial.Monic := by
nontriviality R
simpa only [polynomial_eq] using Cubic.monic_of_b_eq_one'
lemma irreducible_polynomial [IsDomain R] : Irreducible W'.polynomial := by
by_contra h
rcases (monic_polynomial.not_irreducible_iff_exists_add_mul_eq_coeff natDegree_polynomial).mp h
with ⟨f, g, h0, h1⟩
simp only [polynomial_eq, Cubic.coeff_eq_c, Cubic.coeff_eq_d] at h0 h1
apply_fun degree at h0 h1
rw [Cubic.degree_of_a_ne_zero' <| neg_ne_zero.mpr <| one_ne_zero' R, degree_mul] at h0
apply (h1.symm.le.trans Cubic.degree_of_b_eq_zero').not_lt
rcases Nat.WithBot.add_eq_three_iff.mp h0.symm with h | h | h | h
iterate 2 rw [degree_add_eq_right_of_degree_lt] <;> simp only [h] <;> decide
iterate 2 rw [degree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt] <;> simp only [h] <;> decide
lemma evalEval_polynomial (x y : R) : W'.polynomial.evalEval x y =
y ^ 2 + W'.a₁ * x * y + W'.a₃ * y - (x ^ 3 + W'.a₂ * x ^ 2 + W'.a₄ * x + W'.a₆) := by
simp only [polynomial]
eval_simp
rw [add_mul, ← add_assoc]
@[simp]
lemma evalEval_polynomial_zero : W'.polynomial.evalEval 0 0 = -W'.a₆ := by
simp only [evalEval_polynomial, zero_add, zero_sub, mul_zero, zero_pow <| Nat.succ_ne_zero _]
variable (W') in
/-- The proposition that an affine point `(x, y)` lies in a Weierstrass curve `W`.
In other words, it satisfies the Weierstrass equation `W(X, Y) = 0`. -/
def Equation (x y : R) : Prop :=
W'.polynomial.evalEval x y = 0
lemma equation_iff' (x y : R) : W'.Equation x y ↔
y ^ 2 + W'.a₁ * x * y + W'.a₃ * y - (x ^ 3 + W'.a₂ * x ^ 2 + W'.a₄ * x + W'.a₆) = 0 := by
rw [Equation, evalEval_polynomial]
lemma equation_iff (x y : R) : W'.Equation x y ↔
y ^ 2 + W'.a₁ * x * y + W'.a₃ * y = x ^ 3 + W'.a₂ * x ^ 2 + W'.a₄ * x + W'.a₆ := by
rw [equation_iff', sub_eq_zero]
@[simp]
lemma equation_zero : W'.Equation 0 0 ↔ W'.a₆ = 0 := by
rw [Equation, evalEval_polynomial_zero, neg_eq_zero]
lemma equation_iff_variableChange (x y : R) :
W'.Equation x y ↔ (VariableChange.mk 1 x 0 y • W').toAffine.Equation 0 0 := by
rw [equation_iff', ← neg_eq_zero, equation_zero, variableChange_a₆, inv_one, Units.val_one]
congr! 1
ring1
end Equation
section Nonsingular
/-! ### Nonsingular Weierstrass equations -/
variable (W') in
/-- The partial derivative `W_X(X, Y)` with respect to `X` of the polynomial `W(X, Y)` associated to
a Weierstrass curve `W` in affine coordinates. -/
-- TODO: define this in terms of `Polynomial.derivative`.
noncomputable def polynomialX : R[X][Y] :=
C (C W'.a₁) * Y - C (C 3 * X ^ 2 + C (2 * W'.a₂) * X + C W'.a₄)
lemma evalEval_polynomialX (x y : R) :
W'.polynomialX.evalEval x y = W'.a₁ * y - (3 * x ^ 2 + 2 * W'.a₂ * x + W'.a₄) := by
simp only [polynomialX]
eval_simp
@[simp]
lemma evalEval_polynomialX_zero : W'.polynomialX.evalEval 0 0 = -W'.a₄ := by
simp only [evalEval_polynomialX, zero_add, zero_sub, mul_zero, zero_pow <| Nat.succ_ne_zero _]
variable (W') in
/-- The partial derivative `W_Y(X, Y)` with respect to `Y` of the polynomial `W(X, Y)` associated to
a Weierstrass curve `W` in affine coordinates. -/
-- TODO: define this in terms of `Polynomial.derivative`.
noncomputable def polynomialY : R[X][Y] :=
C (C 2) * Y + C (C W'.a₁ * X + C W'.a₃)
lemma evalEval_polynomialY (x y : R) : W'.polynomialY.evalEval x y = 2 * y + W'.a₁ * x + W'.a₃ := by
simp only [polynomialY]
eval_simp
rw [← add_assoc]
@[simp]
lemma evalEval_polynomialY_zero : W'.polynomialY.evalEval 0 0 = W'.a₃ := by
simp only [evalEval_polynomialY, zero_add, mul_zero]
variable (W') in
/-- The proposition that an affine point `(x, y)` on a Weierstrass curve `W` is nonsingular.
In other words, either `W_X(x, y) ≠ 0` or `W_Y(x, y) ≠ 0`.
Note that this definition is only mathematically accurate for fields. -/
-- TODO: generalise this definition to be mathematically accurate for a larger class of rings.
def Nonsingular (x y : R) : Prop :=
W'.Equation x y ∧ (W'.polynomialX.evalEval x y ≠ 0 ∨ W'.polynomialY.evalEval x y ≠ 0)
lemma nonsingular_iff' (x y : R) : W'.Nonsingular x y ↔ W'.Equation x y ∧
(W'.a₁ * y - (3 * x ^ 2 + 2 * W'.a₂ * x + W'.a₄) ≠ 0 ∨ 2 * y + W'.a₁ * x + W'.a₃ ≠ 0) := by
rw [Nonsingular, equation_iff', evalEval_polynomialX, evalEval_polynomialY]
lemma nonsingular_iff (x y : R) : W'.Nonsingular x y ↔ W'.Equation x y ∧
(W'.a₁ * y ≠ 3 * x ^ 2 + 2 * W'.a₂ * x + W'.a₄ ∨ y ≠ -y - W'.a₁ * x - W'.a₃) := by
rw [nonsingular_iff', sub_ne_zero, ← sub_ne_zero (a := y)]
congr! 3
ring1
@[simp]
lemma nonsingular_zero : W'.Nonsingular 0 0 ↔ W'.a₆ = 0 ∧ (W'.a₃ ≠ 0 ∨ W'.a₄ ≠ 0) := by
rw [Nonsingular, equation_zero, evalEval_polynomialX_zero, neg_ne_zero, evalEval_polynomialY_zero,
or_comm]
lemma nonsingular_iff_variableChange (x y : R) :
W'.Nonsingular x y ↔ (VariableChange.mk 1 x 0 y • W').toAffine.Nonsingular 0 0 := by
rw [nonsingular_iff', equation_iff_variableChange, equation_zero, ← neg_ne_zero, or_comm,
nonsingular_zero, variableChange_a₃, variableChange_a₄, inv_one, Units.val_one]
simp only [variableChange_def]
congr! 3 <;> ring1
private lemma equation_zero_iff_nonsingular_zero_of_Δ_ne_zero (hΔ : W'.Δ ≠ 0) :
W'.Equation 0 0 ↔ W'.Nonsingular 0 0 := by
simp only [equation_zero, nonsingular_zero, iff_self_and]
contrapose! hΔ
simp only [b₂, b₄, b₆, b₈, Δ, hΔ]
ring1
/-- A Weierstrass curve is nonsingular at every point if its discriminant is non-zero. -/
lemma equation_iff_nonsingular_of_Δ_ne_zero {x y : R} (hΔ : W'.Δ ≠ 0) :
W'.Equation x y ↔ W'.Nonsingular x y := by
rw [equation_iff_variableChange, nonsingular_iff_variableChange,
equation_zero_iff_nonsingular_zero_of_Δ_ne_zero <| by
rwa [variableChange_Δ, inv_one, Units.val_one, one_pow, one_mul]]
/-- An elliptic curve is nonsingular at every point. -/
lemma equation_iff_nonsingular [Nontrivial R] [W'.IsElliptic] {x y : R} :
W'.toAffine.Equation x y ↔ W'.toAffine.Nonsingular x y :=
W'.toAffine.equation_iff_nonsingular_of_Δ_ne_zero <| W'.coe_Δ' ▸ W'.Δ'.ne_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-01")] alias nonsingular_zero_of_Δ_ne_zero :=
equation_iff_nonsingular_of_Δ_ne_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-01")] alias nonsingular_of_Δ_ne_zero :=
equation_iff_nonsingular_of_Δ_ne_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-01")] alias nonsingular := equation_iff_nonsingular
end Nonsingular
section Ring
/-! ### Group operation polynomials over a ring -/
variable (W') in
/-- The negation polynomial `-Y - a₁X - a₃` associated to the negation of a nonsingular affine point
on a Weierstrass curve. -/
noncomputable def negPolynomial : R[X][Y] :=
-(Y : R[X][Y]) - C (C W'.a₁ * X + C W'.a₃)
lemma Y_sub_polynomialY : Y - W'.polynomialY = W'.negPolynomial := by
rw [polynomialY, negPolynomial]
C_simp
ring1
lemma Y_sub_negPolynomial : Y - W'.negPolynomial = W'.polynomialY := by
rw [← Y_sub_polynomialY, sub_sub_cancel]
variable (W') in
/-- The `Y`-coordinate of `-(x, y)` for a nonsingular affine point `(x, y)` on a Weierstrass curve
`W`.
This depends on `W`, and has argument order: `x`, `y`. -/
@[simp]
def negY (x y : R) : R :=
-y - W'.a₁ * x - W'.a₃
lemma negY_negY (x y : R) : W'.negY x (W'.negY x y) = y := by
simp only [negY]
ring1
lemma evalEval_negPolynomial (x y : R) : W'.negPolynomial.evalEval x y = W'.negY x y := by
rw [negY, sub_sub, negPolynomial]
eval_simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias eval_negPolynomial := evalEval_negPolynomial
/-- The line polynomial `ℓ(X - x) + y` associated to the line `Y = ℓ(X - x) + y` that passes through
a nonsingular affine point `(x, y)` on a Weierstrass curve `W` with a slope of `ℓ`.
This does not depend on `W`, and has argument order: `x`, `y`, `ℓ`. -/
noncomputable def linePolynomial (x y ℓ : R) : R[X] :=
C ℓ * (X - C x) + C y
variable (W') in
/-- The addition polynomial obtained by substituting the line `Y = ℓ(X - x) + y` into the polynomial
`W(X, Y)` associated to a Weierstrass curve `W`. If such a line intersects `W` at another
nonsingular affine point `(x', y')` on `W`, then the roots of this polynomial are precisely `x`,
`x'`, and the `X`-coordinate of the addition of `(x, y)` and `(x', y')`.
This depends on `W`, and has argument order: `x`, `y`, `ℓ`. -/
noncomputable def addPolynomial (x y ℓ : R) : R[X] :=
W'.polynomial.eval <| linePolynomial x y ℓ
lemma C_addPolynomial (x y ℓ : R) : C (W'.addPolynomial x y ℓ) =
(Y - C (linePolynomial x y ℓ)) * (W'.negPolynomial - C (linePolynomial x y ℓ)) +
W'.polynomial := by
rw [addPolynomial, linePolynomial, polynomial, negPolynomial]
eval_simp
C_simp
ring1
lemma addPolynomial_eq (x y ℓ : R) : W'.addPolynomial x y ℓ = -Cubic.toPoly
⟨1, -ℓ ^ 2 - W'.a₁ * ℓ + W'.a₂,
2 * x * ℓ ^ 2 + (W'.a₁ * x - 2 * y - W'.a₃) * ℓ + (-W'.a₁ * y + W'.a₄),
-x ^ 2 * ℓ ^ 2 + (2 * x * y + W'.a₃ * x) * ℓ - (y ^ 2 + W'.a₃ * y - W'.a₆)⟩ := by
rw [addPolynomial, linePolynomial, polynomial, Cubic.toPoly]
eval_simp
C_simp
ring1
variable (W') in
/-- The `X`-coordinate of `(x₁, y₁) + (x₂, y₂)` for two nonsingular affine points `(x₁, y₁)` and
`(x₂, y₂)` on a Weierstrass curve `W`, where the line through them has a slope of `ℓ`.
This depends on `W`, and has argument order: `x₁`, `x₂`, `ℓ`. -/
@[simp]
def addX (x₁ x₂ ℓ : R) : R :=
ℓ ^ 2 + W'.a₁ * ℓ - W'.a₂ - x₁ - x₂
variable (W') in
/-- The `Y`-coordinate of `-((x₁, y₁) + (x₂, y₂))` for two nonsingular affine points `(x₁, y₁)` and
`(x₂, y₂)` on a Weierstrass curve `W`, where the line through them has a slope of `ℓ`.
This depends on `W`, and has argument order: `x₁`, `x₂`, `y₁`, `ℓ`. -/
@[simp]
def negAddY (x₁ x₂ y₁ ℓ : R) : R :=
ℓ * (W'.addX x₁ x₂ ℓ - x₁) + y₁
variable (W') in
/-- The `Y`-coordinate of `(x₁, y₁) + (x₂, y₂)` for two nonsingular affine points `(x₁, y₁)` and
`(x₂, y₂)` on a Weierstrass curve `W`, where the line through them has a slope of `ℓ`.
This depends on `W`, and has argument order: `x₁`, `x₂`, `y₁`, `ℓ`. -/
@[simp]
def addY (x₁ x₂ y₁ ℓ : R) : R :=
W'.negY (W'.addX x₁ x₂ ℓ) (W'.negAddY x₁ x₂ y₁ ℓ)
lemma equation_neg (x y : R) : W'.Equation x (W'.negY x y) ↔ W'.Equation x y := by
rw [equation_iff, equation_iff, negY]
congr! 1
ring1
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-01")] alias equation_neg_of := equation_neg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-01")] alias equation_neg_iff := equation_neg
lemma nonsingular_neg (x y : R) : W'.Nonsingular x (W'.negY x y) ↔ W'.Nonsingular x y := by
rw [nonsingular_iff, equation_neg, ← negY, negY_negY, ← @ne_comm _ y, nonsingular_iff]
exact and_congr_right' <| (iff_congr not_and_or.symm not_and_or.symm).mpr <|
not_congr <| and_congr_left fun h => by rw [← h]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-01")] alias nonsingular_neg_of := nonsingular_neg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-01")] alias nonsingular_neg_iff := nonsingular_neg
lemma equation_add_iff (x₁ x₂ y₁ ℓ : R) : W'.Equation (W'.addX x₁ x₂ ℓ) (W'.negAddY x₁ x₂ y₁ ℓ) ↔
(W'.addPolynomial x₁ y₁ ℓ).eval (W'.addX x₁ x₂ ℓ) = 0 := by
rw [Equation, negAddY, addPolynomial, linePolynomial, polynomial]
eval_simp
lemma nonsingular_negAdd_of_eval_derivative_ne_zero {x₁ x₂ y₁ ℓ : R}
(hx' : W'.Equation (W'.addX x₁ x₂ ℓ) (W'.negAddY x₁ x₂ y₁ ℓ))
(hx : (W'.addPolynomial x₁ y₁ ℓ).derivative.eval (W'.addX x₁ x₂ ℓ) ≠ 0) :
W'.Nonsingular (W'.addX x₁ x₂ ℓ) (W'.negAddY x₁ x₂ y₁ ℓ) := by
rw [Nonsingular, and_iff_right hx', negAddY, polynomialX, polynomialY]
eval_simp
contrapose! hx
rw [addPolynomial, linePolynomial, polynomial]
eval_simp
derivative_simp
simp only [zero_add, add_zero, sub_zero, zero_mul, mul_one]
eval_simp
linear_combination (norm := (norm_num1; ring1)) hx.left + ℓ * hx.right
end Ring
section Field
/-! ### Group operation polynomials over a field -/
open Classical in
variable (W) in
/-- The slope of the line through two nonsingular affine points `(x₁, y₁)` and `(x₂, y₂)` on a
Weierstrass curve `W`.
If `x₁ ≠ x₂`, then this line is the secant of `W` through `(x₁, y₁)` and `(x₂, y₂)`, and has slope
`(y₁ - y₂) / (x₁ - x₂)`. Otherwise, if `y₁ ≠ -y₁ - a₁x₁ - a₃`, then this line is the tangent of `W`
at `(x₁, y₁) = (x₂, y₂)`, and has slope `(3x₁² + 2a₂x₁ + a₄ - a₁y₁) / (2y₁ + a₁x₁ + a₃)`. Otherwise,
this line is vertical, in which case this returns the value `0`.
This depends on `W`, and has argument order: `x₁`, `x₂`, `y₁`, `y₂`. -/
noncomputable def slope (x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F) : F :=
if x₁ = x₂ then if y₁ = W.negY x₂ y₂ then 0
else (3 * x₁ ^ 2 + 2 * W.a₂ * x₁ + W.a₄ - W.a₁ * y₁) / (y₁ - W.negY x₁ y₁)
else (y₁ - y₂) / (x₁ - x₂)
@[simp]
lemma slope_of_Y_eq {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} (hx : x₁ = x₂) (hy : y₁ = W.negY x₂ y₂) :
W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ = 0 := by
rw [slope, if_pos hx, if_pos hy]
@[simp]
lemma slope_of_Y_ne {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} (hx : x₁ = x₂) (hy : y₁ ≠ W.negY x₂ y₂) :
W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ =
(3 * x₁ ^ 2 + 2 * W.a₂ * x₁ + W.a₄ - W.a₁ * y₁) / (y₁ - W.negY x₁ y₁) := by
rw [slope, if_pos hx, if_neg hy]
@[simp]
lemma slope_of_X_ne {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} (hx : x₁ ≠ x₂) :
W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ = (y₁ - y₂) / (x₁ - x₂) := by
rw [slope, if_neg hx]
lemma slope_of_Y_ne_eq_evalEval {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} (hx : x₁ = x₂) (hy : y₁ ≠ W.negY x₂ y₂) :
W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ = -W.polynomialX.evalEval x₁ y₁ / W.polynomialY.evalEval x₁ y₁ := by
rw [slope_of_Y_ne hx hy, evalEval_polynomialX, neg_sub]
congr 1
rw [negY, evalEval_polynomialY]
ring1
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias slope_of_Y_ne_eq_eval := slope_of_Y_ne_eq_evalEval
lemma Y_eq_of_X_eq {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} (h₁ : W.Equation x₁ y₁) (h₂ : W.Equation x₂ y₂)
(hx : x₁ = x₂) : y₁ = y₂ ∨ y₁ = W.negY x₂ y₂ := by
rw [equation_iff] at h₁ h₂
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← sub_eq_zero (a := y₁), ← mul_eq_zero, negY]
linear_combination (norm := (rw [hx]; ring1)) h₁ - h₂
lemma Y_eq_of_Y_ne {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} (h₁ : W.Equation x₁ y₁) (h₂ : W.Equation x₂ y₂) (hx : x₁ = x₂)
(hy : y₁ ≠ W.negY x₂ y₂) : y₁ = y₂ :=
(Y_eq_of_X_eq h₁ h₂ hx).resolve_right hy
lemma addPolynomial_slope {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} (h₁ : W.Equation x₁ y₁) (h₂ : W.Equation x₂ y₂)
(hxy : ¬(x₁ = x₂ ∧ y₁ = W.negY x₂ y₂)) : W.addPolynomial x₁ y₁ (W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) =
-((X - C x₁) * (X - C x₂) * (X - C (W.addX x₁ x₂ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂))) := by
rw [addPolynomial_eq, neg_inj, Cubic.prod_X_sub_C_eq, Cubic.toPoly_injective]
by_cases hx : x₁ = x₂
· have hy : y₁ ≠ W.negY x₂ y₂ := fun h => hxy ⟨hx, h⟩
rcases hx, Y_eq_of_Y_ne h₁ h₂ hx hy with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
rw [equation_iff] at h₁ h₂
rw [slope_of_Y_ne rfl hy]
rw [negY, ← sub_ne_zero] at hy
ext
· rfl
· simp only [addX]
ring1
· field_simp [hy]
ring1
· linear_combination (norm := (field_simp [hy]; ring1)) -h₁
· rw [equation_iff] at h₁ h₂
rw [slope_of_X_ne hx]
rw [← sub_eq_zero] at hx
ext
· rfl
· simp only [addX]
ring1
· apply mul_right_injective₀ hx
linear_combination (norm := (field_simp [hx]; ring1)) h₂ - h₁
· apply mul_right_injective₀ hx
linear_combination (norm := (field_simp [hx]; ring1)) x₂ * h₁ - x₁ * h₂
/-- The negated addition of two affine points in `W` on a sloped line lies in `W`. -/
lemma equation_negAdd {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} (h₁ : W.Equation x₁ y₁) (h₂ : W.Equation x₂ y₂)
(hxy : ¬(x₁ = x₂ ∧ y₁ = W.negY x₂ y₂)) : W.Equation
(W.addX x₁ x₂ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) (W.negAddY x₁ x₂ y₁ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) := by
rw [equation_add_iff, addPolynomial_slope h₁ h₂ hxy]
eval_simp
rw [neg_eq_zero, sub_self, mul_zero]
/-- The addition of two affine points in `W` on a sloped line lies in `W`. -/
lemma equation_add {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} (h₁ : W.Equation x₁ y₁) (h₂ : W.Equation x₂ y₂)
(hxy : ¬(x₁ = x₂ ∧ y₁ = W.negY x₂ y₂)) :
W.Equation (W.addX x₁ x₂ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) (W.addY x₁ x₂ y₁ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) :=
(equation_neg ..).mpr <| equation_negAdd h₁ h₂ hxy
lemma C_addPolynomial_slope {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} (h₁ : W.Equation x₁ y₁) (h₂ : W.Equation x₂ y₂)
(hxy : ¬(x₁ = x₂ ∧ y₁ = W.negY x₂ y₂)) : C (W.addPolynomial x₁ y₁ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) =
-(C (X - C x₁) * C (X - C x₂) * C (X - C (W.addX x₁ x₂ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂))) := by
rw [addPolynomial_slope h₁ h₂ hxy]
map_simp
lemma derivative_addPolynomial_slope {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} (h₁ : W.Equation x₁ y₁)
(h₂ : W.Equation x₂ y₂) (hxy : ¬(x₁ = x₂ ∧ y₁ = W.negY x₂ y₂)) :
derivative (W.addPolynomial x₁ y₁ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) =
-((X - C x₁) * (X - C x₂) + (X - C x₁) * (X - C (W.addX x₁ x₂ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂)) +
(X - C x₂) * (X - C (W.addX x₁ x₂ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂))) := by
rw [addPolynomial_slope h₁ h₂ hxy]
derivative_simp
ring1
/-- The negated addition of two nonsingular affine points in `W` on a sloped line is nonsingular. -/
lemma nonsingular_negAdd {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} (h₁ : W.Nonsingular x₁ y₁) (h₂ : W.Nonsingular x₂ y₂)
(hxy : ¬(x₁ = x₂ ∧ y₁ = W.negY x₂ y₂)) : W.Nonsingular
(W.addX x₁ x₂ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) (W.negAddY x₁ x₂ y₁ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) := by
by_cases hx₁ : W.addX x₁ x₂ (W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) = x₁
· rwa [negAddY, hx₁, sub_self, mul_zero, zero_add]
· by_cases hx₂ : W.addX x₁ x₂ (W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) = x₂
· by_cases hx : x₁ = x₂
· subst hx
contradiction
· rwa [negAddY, ← neg_sub, mul_neg, hx₂, slope_of_X_ne hx,
div_mul_cancel₀ _ <| sub_ne_zero_of_ne hx, neg_sub, sub_add_cancel]
· apply nonsingular_negAdd_of_eval_derivative_ne_zero <| equation_negAdd h₁.left h₂.left hxy
rw [derivative_addPolynomial_slope h₁.left h₂.left hxy]
eval_simp
simp only [neg_ne_zero, sub_self, mul_zero, add_zero]
exact mul_ne_zero (sub_ne_zero_of_ne hx₁) (sub_ne_zero_of_ne hx₂)
/-- The addition of two nonsingular affine points in `W` on a sloped line is nonsingular. -/
lemma nonsingular_add {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} (h₁ : W.Nonsingular x₁ y₁) (h₂ : W.Nonsingular x₂ y₂)
(hxy : ¬(x₁ = x₂ ∧ y₁ = W.negY x₂ y₂)) :
W.Nonsingular (W.addX x₁ x₂ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) (W.addY x₁ x₂ y₁ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) :=
(nonsingular_neg ..).mpr <| nonsingular_negAdd h₁ h₂ hxy
/-- The formula `x(P₁ + P₂) = x(P₁ - P₂) - ψ(P₁)ψ(P₂) / (x(P₂) - x(P₁))²`,
where `ψ(x,y) = 2y + a₁x + a₃`. -/
lemma addX_eq_addX_negY_sub {x₁ x₂ : F} (y₁ y₂ : F) (hx : x₁ ≠ x₂) :
W.addX x₁ x₂ (W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) = W.addX x₁ x₂ (W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ <| W.negY x₂ y₂) -
(y₁ - W.negY x₁ y₁) * (y₂ - W.negY x₂ y₂) / (x₂ - x₁) ^ 2 := by
simp_rw [slope_of_X_ne hx, addX, negY, ← neg_sub x₁, neg_sq]
field_simp [sub_ne_zero.mpr hx]
ring1
/-- The formula `y(P₁)(x(P₂) - x(P₃)) + y(P₂)(x(P₃) - x(P₁)) + y(P₃)(x(P₁) - x(P₂)) = 0`,
assuming that `P₁ + P₂ + P₃ = O`. -/
lemma cyclic_sum_Y_mul_X_sub_X {x₁ x₂ : F} (y₁ y₂ : F) (hx : x₁ ≠ x₂) :
let x₃ := W.addX x₁ x₂ (W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂)
y₁ * (x₂ - x₃) + y₂ * (x₃ - x₁) + W.negAddY x₁ x₂ y₁ (W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) * (x₁ - x₂) = 0 := by
simp_rw [slope_of_X_ne hx, negAddY, addX]
field_simp [sub_ne_zero.mpr hx]
ring1
/-- The formula `ψ(P₁ + P₂) = (ψ(P₂)(x(P₁) - x(P₃)) - ψ(P₁)(x(P₂) - x(P₃))) / (x(P₂) - x(P₁))`,
where `ψ(x,y) = 2y + a₁x + a₃`. -/
lemma addY_sub_negY_addY {x₁ x₂ : F} (y₁ y₂ : F) (hx : x₁ ≠ x₂) :
let x₃ := W.addX x₁ x₂ (W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂)
let y₃ := W.addY x₁ x₂ y₁ (W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂)
y₃ - W.negY x₃ y₃ =
((y₂ - W.negY x₂ y₂) * (x₁ - x₃) - (y₁ - W.negY x₁ y₁) * (x₂ - x₃)) / (x₂ - x₁) := by
simp_rw [addY, negY, eq_div_iff (sub_ne_zero.mpr hx.symm)]
linear_combination (norm := ring1) 2 * cyclic_sum_Y_mul_X_sub_X y₁ y₂ hx
end Field
section Group
/-! ### Nonsingular points -/
variable (W') in
/-- A nonsingular point on a Weierstrass curve `W` in affine coordinates. This is either the unique
point at infinity `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.Point.zero` or a nonsingular affine point
`WeierstrassCurve.Affine.Point.some (x, y)` satisfying the Weierstrass equation of `W`. -/
inductive Point
| zero
| some {x y : R} (h : W'.Nonsingular x y)
/-- For an algebraic extension `S` of a ring `R`, the type of nonsingular `S`-points on a
Weierstrass curve `W` over `R` in affine coordinates. -/
scoped notation3:max W' "⟮" S "⟯" => Affine.Point <| baseChange W' S
namespace Point
/-! ### Group operations -/
instance : Inhabited W'.Point :=
⟨.zero⟩
instance : Zero W'.Point :=
⟨.zero⟩
lemma zero_def : 0 = (.zero : W'.Point) :=
rfl
lemma some_ne_zero {x y : R} (h : W'.Nonsingular x y) : Point.some h ≠ 0 := by
rintro (_ | _)
/-- The negation of a nonsingular point on a Weierstrass curve in affine coordinates.
Given a nonsingular point `P` in affine coordinates, use `-P` instead of `neg P`. -/
def neg : W'.Point → W'.Point
| 0 => 0
| some h => some <| (nonsingular_neg ..).mpr h
instance : Neg W'.Point :=
⟨neg⟩
lemma neg_def (P : W'.Point) : -P = P.neg :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma neg_zero : (-0 : W'.Point) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma neg_some {x y : R} (h : W'.Nonsingular x y) : -some h = some ((nonsingular_neg ..).mpr h) :=
rfl
instance : InvolutiveNeg W'.Point where
neg_neg := by
rintro (_ | _)
· rfl
· simp only [neg_some, negY_negY]
open Classical in
/-- The addition of two nonsingular points on a Weierstrass curve in affine coordinates.
Given two nonsingular points `P` and `Q` in affine coordinates, use `P + Q` instead of `add P Q`. -/
noncomputable def add : W.Point → W.Point → W.Point
| 0, P => P
| P, 0 => P
| @some _ _ _ x₁ y₁ h₁, @some _ _ _ x₂ y₂ h₂ =>
if hxy : x₁ = x₂ ∧ y₁ = W.negY x₂ y₂ then 0 else some <| nonsingular_add h₁ h₂ hxy
noncomputable instance : Add W.Point :=
⟨add⟩
noncomputable instance : AddZeroClass W.Point :=
⟨by rintro (_ | _) <;> rfl, by rintro (_ | _) <;> rfl⟩
lemma add_def (P Q : W.Point) : P + Q = P.add Q :=
rfl
lemma add_some {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} (hxy : ¬(x₁ = x₂ ∧ y₁ = W.negY x₂ y₂)) {h₁ : W.Nonsingular x₁ y₁}
{h₂ : W.Nonsingular x₂ y₂} : some h₁ + some h₂ = some (nonsingular_add h₁ h₂ hxy) := by
simp only [add_def, add, dif_neg hxy]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-28")] alias add_of_imp := add_some
@[simp]
lemma add_of_Y_eq {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} {h₁ : W.Nonsingular x₁ y₁} {h₂ : W.Nonsingular x₂ y₂}
(hx : x₁ = x₂) (hy : y₁ = W.negY x₂ y₂) : some h₁ + some h₂ = 0 := by
simpa only [add_def, add] using dif_pos ⟨hx, hy⟩
@[simp]
lemma add_self_of_Y_eq {x₁ y₁ : F} {h₁ : W.Nonsingular x₁ y₁} (hy : y₁ = W.negY x₁ y₁) :
some h₁ + some h₁ = 0 :=
add_of_Y_eq rfl hy
@[simp]
lemma add_of_Y_ne {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} {h₁ : W.Nonsingular x₁ y₁} {h₂ : W.Nonsingular x₂ y₂}
(hy : y₁ ≠ W.negY x₂ y₂) :
some h₁ + some h₂ = some (nonsingular_add h₁ h₂ fun hxy => hy hxy.right) :=
add_some fun hxy => hy hxy.right
lemma add_of_Y_ne' {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} {h₁ : W.Nonsingular x₁ y₁} {h₂ : W.Nonsingular x₂ y₂}
(hy : y₁ ≠ W.negY x₂ y₂) :
some h₁ + some h₂ = -some (nonsingular_negAdd h₁ h₂ fun hxy => hy hxy.right) :=
add_of_Y_ne hy
@[simp]
lemma add_self_of_Y_ne {x₁ y₁ : F} {h₁ : W.Nonsingular x₁ y₁} (hy : y₁ ≠ W.negY x₁ y₁) :
some h₁ + some h₁ = some (nonsingular_add h₁ h₁ fun hxy => hy hxy.right) :=
add_of_Y_ne hy
lemma add_self_of_Y_ne' {x₁ y₁ : F} {h₁ : W.Nonsingular x₁ y₁} (hy : y₁ ≠ W.negY x₁ y₁) :
some h₁ + some h₁ = -some (nonsingular_negAdd h₁ h₁ fun hxy => hy hxy.right) :=
add_of_Y_ne hy
@[simp]
lemma add_of_X_ne {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} {h₁ : W.Nonsingular x₁ y₁} {h₂ : W.Nonsingular x₂ y₂}
(hx : x₁ ≠ x₂) : some h₁ + some h₂ = some (nonsingular_add h₁ h₂ fun hxy => hx hxy.left) :=
add_some fun hxy => hx hxy.left
lemma add_of_X_ne' {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} {h₁ : W.Nonsingular x₁ y₁} {h₂ : W.Nonsingular x₂ y₂}
(hx : x₁ ≠ x₂) : some h₁ + some h₂ = -some (nonsingular_negAdd h₁ h₂ fun hxy => hx hxy.left) :=
add_of_X_ne hx
end Point
end Group
section Map
/-! ### Maps across ring homomorphisms -/
variable (f : R →+* S) (x y x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ ℓ : R)
lemma map_polynomial : (W'.map f).toAffine.polynomial = W'.polynomial.map (mapRingHom f) := by
simp only [polynomial]
map_simp
lemma evalEval_baseChange_polynomial :
(W'.baseChange R[X][Y]).toAffine.polynomial.evalEval (C X) Y = W'.polynomial := by
rw [map_polynomial, evalEval, eval_map, eval_C_X_eval₂_map_C_X]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias evalEval_baseChange_polynomial_X_Y :=
evalEval_baseChange_polynomial
variable {x y} in
lemma Equation.map {x y : R} (h : W'.Equation x y) : (W'.map f).toAffine.Equation (f x) (f y) := by
rw [Equation, map_polynomial, map_mapRingHom_evalEval, h, map_zero]
variable {f} in
lemma map_equation (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(W'.map f).toAffine.Equation (f x) (f y) ↔ W'.Equation x y := by
simp only [Equation, map_polynomial, map_mapRingHom_evalEval, map_eq_zero_iff f hf]
lemma map_polynomialX : (W'.map f).toAffine.polynomialX = W'.polynomialX.map (mapRingHom f) := by
simp only [polynomialX]
map_simp
lemma map_polynomialY : (W'.map f).toAffine.polynomialY = W'.polynomialY.map (mapRingHom f) := by
simp only [polynomialY]
map_simp
variable {f} in
lemma map_nonsingular (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(W'.map f).toAffine.Nonsingular (f x) (f y) ↔ W'.Nonsingular x y := by
simp only [Nonsingular, evalEval, map_equation _ _ hf, map_polynomialX, map_polynomialY,
map_mapRingHom_evalEval, map_ne_zero_iff f hf]
lemma map_negPolynomial :
(W'.map f).toAffine.negPolynomial = W'.negPolynomial.map (mapRingHom f) := by
simp only [negPolynomial]
map_simp
lemma map_negY : (W'.map f).toAffine.negY (f x) (f y) = f (W'.negY x y) := by
simp only [negY]
map_simp
lemma map_linePolynomial : linePolynomial (f x) (f y) (f ℓ) = (linePolynomial x y ℓ).map f := by
simp only [linePolynomial]
map_simp
lemma map_addPolynomial :
(W'.map f).toAffine.addPolynomial (f x) (f y) (f ℓ) = (W'.addPolynomial x y ℓ).map f := by
rw [addPolynomial, map_polynomial, eval_map, linePolynomial, addPolynomial, ← coe_mapRingHom,
← eval₂_hom, linePolynomial]
map_simp
lemma map_addX : (W'.map f).toAffine.addX (f x₁) (f x₂) (f ℓ) = f (W'.addX x₁ x₂ ℓ) := by
simp only [addX]
map_simp
lemma map_negAddY :
(W'.map f).toAffine.negAddY (f x₁) (f x₂) (f y₁) (f ℓ) = f (W'.negAddY x₁ x₂ y₁ ℓ) := by
simp only [negAddY, map_addX]
map_simp
lemma map_addY :
(W'.map f).toAffine.addY (f x₁) (f x₂) (f y₁) (f ℓ) = f (W'.toAffine.addY x₁ x₂ y₁ ℓ) := by
simp only [addY, map_negAddY, map_addX, map_negY]
lemma map_slope (f : F →+* K) (x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F) :
(W.map f).toAffine.slope (f x₁) (f x₂) (f y₁) (f y₂) = f (W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) := by
by_cases hx : x₁ = x₂
· by_cases hy : y₁ = W.negY x₂ y₂
· rw [slope_of_Y_eq (congr_arg f hx) <| by rw [hy, map_negY], slope_of_Y_eq hx hy, map_zero]
· rw [slope_of_Y_ne (congr_arg f hx) <| map_negY f x₂ y₂ ▸ fun h => hy <| f.injective h,
map_negY, slope_of_Y_ne hx hy]
map_simp
· rw [slope_of_X_ne fun h => hx <| f.injective h, slope_of_X_ne hx]
map_simp
end Map
section BaseChange
/-! ### Base changes across algebra homomorphisms -/
variable [Algebra R S] [Algebra R A] [Algebra S A] [IsScalarTower R S A] [Algebra R B] [Algebra S B]
[IsScalarTower R S B] (f : A →ₐ[S] B) (x y x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ ℓ : A)
lemma baseChange_polynomial : (W'.baseChange B).toAffine.polynomial =
(W'.baseChange A).toAffine.polynomial.map (mapRingHom f) := by
rw [← map_polynomial, map_baseChange]
variable {x y} in
lemma Equation.baseChange (h : (W'.baseChange A).toAffine.Equation x y) :
(W'.baseChange B).toAffine.Equation (f x) (f y) := by
convert Equation.map f.toRingHom h using 1
rw [AlgHom.toRingHom_eq_coe, map_baseChange]
variable {f} in
lemma baseChange_equation (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(W'.baseChange B).toAffine.Equation (f x) (f y) ↔ (W'.baseChange A).toAffine.Equation x y := by
rw [← map_equation _ _ hf, AlgHom.toRingHom_eq_coe, map_baseChange, RingHom.coe_coe]
lemma baseChange_polynomialX : (W'.baseChange B).toAffine.polynomialX =
(W'.baseChange A).toAffine.polynomialX.map (mapRingHom f) := by
rw [← map_polynomialX, map_baseChange]
lemma baseChange_polynomialY : (W'.baseChange B).toAffine.polynomialY =
(W'.baseChange A).toAffine.polynomialY.map (mapRingHom f) := by
rw [← map_polynomialY, map_baseChange]
variable {f} in
lemma baseChange_nonsingular (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(W'.baseChange B).toAffine.Nonsingular (f x) (f y) ↔
(W'.baseChange A).toAffine.Nonsingular x y := by
rw [← map_nonsingular _ _ hf, AlgHom.toRingHom_eq_coe, map_baseChange, RingHom.coe_coe]
lemma baseChange_negPolynomial : (W'.baseChange B).toAffine.negPolynomial =
(W'.baseChange A).toAffine.negPolynomial.map (mapRingHom f) := by
rw [← map_negPolynomial, map_baseChange]
lemma baseChange_negY :
(W'.baseChange B).toAffine.negY (f x) (f y) = f ((W'.baseChange A).toAffine.negY x y) := by
rw [← RingHom.coe_coe, ← map_negY, map_baseChange]
lemma baseChange_addPolynomial : (W'.baseChange B).toAffine.addPolynomial (f x) (f y) (f ℓ) =
((W'.baseChange A).toAffine.addPolynomial x y ℓ).map f := by
rw [← RingHom.coe_coe, ← map_addPolynomial, map_baseChange]
lemma baseChange_addX : (W'.baseChange B).toAffine.addX (f x₁) (f x₂) (f ℓ) =
f ((W'.baseChange A).toAffine.addX x₁ x₂ ℓ) := by
| rw [← RingHom.coe_coe, ← map_addX, map_baseChange]
lemma baseChange_negAddY : (W'.baseChange B).toAffine.negAddY (f x₁) (f x₂) (f y₁) (f ℓ) =
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/EllipticCurve/Affine.lean | 871 | 873 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Countable.Small
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Powerset
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Countable
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Small.Set
import Mathlib.Logic.UnivLE
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Order
/-!
# Basic results on cardinal numbers
We provide a collection of basic results on cardinal numbers, in particular focussing on
finite/countable/small types and sets.
## Main definitions
* `Cardinal.powerlt a b` or `a ^< b` is defined as the supremum of `a ^ c` for `c < b`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinal_number>
## Tags
cardinal number, cardinal arithmetic, cardinal exponentiation, aleph,
Cantor's theorem, König's theorem, Konig's theorem
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open List (Vector)
open Function Order Set
noncomputable section
universe u v w v' w'
variable {α β : Type u}
namespace Cardinal
/-! ### Lifting cardinals to a higher universe -/
@[simp]
lemma mk_preimage_down {s : Set α} : #(ULift.down.{v} ⁻¹' s) = lift.{v} (#s) := by
rw [← mk_uLift, Cardinal.eq]
constructor
let f : ULift.down ⁻¹' s → ULift s := fun x ↦ ULift.up (restrictPreimage s ULift.down x)
have : Function.Bijective f :=
ULift.up_bijective.comp (restrictPreimage_bijective _ (ULift.down_bijective))
exact Equiv.ofBijective f this
-- `simp` can't figure out universe levels: normal form is `lift_mk_shrink'`.
theorem lift_mk_shrink (α : Type u) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{max u w} #(Shrink.{v} α) = Cardinal.lift.{max v w} #α :=
lift_mk_eq.2 ⟨(equivShrink α).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk_shrink' (α : Type u) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{u} #(Shrink.{v} α) = Cardinal.lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_shrink.{u, v, 0} α
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk_shrink'' (α : Type max u v) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{u} #(Shrink.{v} α) = #α := by
rw [← lift_umax, lift_mk_shrink.{max u v, v, 0} α, ← lift_umax, lift_id]
theorem prod_eq_of_fintype {α : Type u} [h : Fintype α] (f : α → Cardinal.{v}) :
prod f = Cardinal.lift.{u} (∏ i, f i) := by
revert f
refine Fintype.induction_empty_option ?_ ?_ ?_ α (h_fintype := h)
· intro α β hβ e h f
letI := Fintype.ofEquiv β e.symm
rw [← e.prod_comp f, ← h]
exact mk_congr (e.piCongrLeft _).symm
· intro f
rw [Fintype.univ_pempty, Finset.prod_empty, lift_one, Cardinal.prod, mk_eq_one]
· intro α hα h f
rw [Cardinal.prod, mk_congr Equiv.piOptionEquivProd, mk_prod, lift_umax.{v, u}, mk_out, ←
Cardinal.prod, lift_prod, Fintype.prod_option, lift_mul, ← h fun a => f (some a)]
simp only [lift_id]
/-! ### Basic cardinals -/
theorem le_one_iff_subsingleton {α : Type u} : #α ≤ 1 ↔ Subsingleton α :=
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨fun _ _ => f.injective (Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩, fun ⟨h⟩ =>
⟨fun _ => ULift.up 0, fun _ _ _ => h _ _⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton {s : Set α} : #s ≤ 1 ↔ s.Subsingleton :=
le_one_iff_subsingleton.trans s.subsingleton_coe
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Subsingleton.cardinalMk_le_one⟩ := mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-10")]
alias _root_.Set.Subsingleton.cardinal_mk_le_one := Set.Subsingleton.cardinalMk_le_one
private theorem cast_succ (n : ℕ) : ((n + 1 : ℕ) : Cardinal.{u}) = n + 1 := by
change #(ULift.{u} _) = #(ULift.{u} _) + 1
rw [← mk_option]
simp
/-! ### Order properties -/
theorem one_lt_iff_nontrivial {α : Type u} : 1 < #α ↔ Nontrivial α := by
rw [← not_le, le_one_iff_subsingleton, ← not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton, Classical.not_not]
lemma sInf_eq_zero_iff {s : Set Cardinal} : sInf s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ ∨ ∃ a ∈ s, a = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | hne
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr ⟨sInf s, csInf_mem hne, h⟩
· rcases h with rfl | ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
· exact Cardinal.sInf_empty
· exact eq_bot_iff.2 (csInf_le' ha)
lemma iInf_eq_zero_iff {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → Cardinal} :
(⨅ i, f i) = 0 ↔ IsEmpty ι ∨ ∃ i, f i = 0 := by
simp [iInf, sInf_eq_zero_iff]
/-- A variant of `ciSup_of_empty` but with `0` on the RHS for convenience -/
protected theorem iSup_of_empty {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) [IsEmpty ι] : iSup f = 0 :=
ciSup_of_empty f
@[simp]
theorem lift_sInf (s : Set Cardinal) : lift.{u, v} (sInf s) = sInf (lift.{u, v} '' s) := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | hs)
· simp
· exact lift_monotone.map_csInf hs
@[simp]
theorem lift_iInf {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) : lift.{u, v} (iInf f) = ⨅ i, lift.{u, v} (f i) := by
unfold iInf
convert lift_sInf (range f)
simp_rw [← comp_apply (f := lift), range_comp]
end Cardinal
/-! ### Small sets of cardinals -/
namespace Cardinal
instance small_Iic (a : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Iic a) := by
rw [← mk_out a]
apply @small_of_surjective (Set a.out) (Iic #a.out) _ fun x => ⟨#x, mk_set_le x⟩
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
simpa using le_mk_iff_exists_set.1 hx
instance small_Iio (a : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Iio a) := small_subset Iio_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Icc (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Icc a b) := small_subset Icc_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Ico (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ico a b) := small_subset Ico_subset_Iio_self
instance small_Ioc (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ioc a b) := small_subset Ioc_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Ioo (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ioo a b) := small_subset Ioo_subset_Iio_self
/-- A set of cardinals is bounded above iff it's small, i.e. it corresponds to a usual ZFC set. -/
theorem bddAbove_iff_small {s : Set Cardinal.{u}} : BddAbove s ↔ Small.{u} s :=
⟨fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => @small_subset _ (Iic a) s (fun _ h => ha h) _, by
rintro ⟨ι, ⟨e⟩⟩
use sum.{u, u} fun x ↦ e.symm x
intro a ha
simpa using le_sum (fun x ↦ e.symm x) (e ⟨a, ha⟩)⟩
theorem bddAbove_of_small (s : Set Cardinal.{u}) [h : Small.{u} s] : BddAbove s :=
bddAbove_iff_small.2 h
theorem bddAbove_range {ι : Type*} [Small.{u} ι] (f : ι → Cardinal.{u}) : BddAbove (Set.range f) :=
bddAbove_of_small _
theorem bddAbove_image (f : Cardinal.{u} → Cardinal.{max u v}) {s : Set Cardinal.{u}}
(hs : BddAbove s) : BddAbove (f '' s) := by
rw [bddAbove_iff_small] at hs ⊢
exact small_lift _
theorem bddAbove_range_comp {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Cardinal.{v}} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
(g : Cardinal.{v} → Cardinal.{max v w}) : BddAbove (range (g ∘ f)) := by
rw [range_comp]
exact bddAbove_image g hf
/-- The type of cardinals in universe `u` is not `Small.{u}`. This is a version of the Burali-Forti
paradox. -/
theorem _root_.not_small_cardinal : ¬ Small.{u} Cardinal.{max u v} := by
intro h
have := small_lift.{_, v} Cardinal.{max u v}
rw [← small_univ_iff, ← bddAbove_iff_small] at this
exact not_bddAbove_univ this
instance uncountable : Uncountable Cardinal.{u} :=
Uncountable.of_not_small not_small_cardinal.{u}
/-! ### Bounds on suprema -/
theorem sum_le_iSup_lift {ι : Type u}
(f : ι → Cardinal.{max u v}) : sum f ≤ Cardinal.lift #ι * iSup f := by
rw [← (iSup f).lift_id, ← lift_umax, lift_umax.{max u v, u}, ← sum_const]
exact sum_le_sum _ _ (le_ciSup <| bddAbove_of_small _)
theorem sum_le_iSup {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Cardinal.{u}) : sum f ≤ #ι * iSup f := by
rw [← lift_id #ι]
exact sum_le_iSup_lift f
/-- The lift of a supremum is the supremum of the lifts. -/
theorem lift_sSup {s : Set Cardinal} (hs : BddAbove s) :
lift.{u} (sSup s) = sSup (lift.{u} '' s) := by
apply ((le_csSup_iff' (bddAbove_image.{_,u} _ hs)).2 fun c hc => _).antisymm (csSup_le' _)
· intro c hc
by_contra h
obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := Cardinal.mem_range_lift_of_le (not_le.1 h).le
simp_rw [lift_le] at h hc
rw [csSup_le_iff' hs] at h
exact h fun a ha => lift_le.1 <| hc (mem_image_of_mem _ ha)
· rintro i ⟨j, hj, rfl⟩
exact lift_le.2 (le_csSup hs hj)
/-- The lift of a supremum is the supremum of the lifts. -/
theorem lift_iSup {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) :
lift.{u} (iSup f) = ⨆ i, lift.{u} (f i) := by
rw [iSup, iSup, lift_sSup hf, ← range_comp]
simp [Function.comp_def]
/-- To prove that the lift of a supremum is bounded by some cardinal `t`,
it suffices to show that the lift of each cardinal is bounded by `t`. -/
theorem lift_iSup_le {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} {t : Cardinal} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
(w : ∀ i, lift.{u} (f i) ≤ t) : lift.{u} (iSup f) ≤ t := by
rw [lift_iSup hf]
exact ciSup_le' w
@[simp]
theorem lift_iSup_le_iff {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
{t : Cardinal} : lift.{u} (iSup f) ≤ t ↔ ∀ i, lift.{u} (f i) ≤ t := by
rw [lift_iSup hf]
exact ciSup_le_iff' (bddAbove_range_comp.{_,_,u} hf _)
/-- To prove an inequality between the lifts to a common universe of two different supremums,
it suffices to show that the lift of each cardinal from the smaller supremum
if bounded by the lift of some cardinal from the larger supremum.
-/
theorem lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup {ι : Type v} {ι' : Type v'} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}}
{f' : ι' → Cardinal.{w'}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) (hf' : BddAbove (range f')) {g : ι → ι'}
(h : ∀ i, lift.{w'} (f i) ≤ lift.{w} (f' (g i))) : lift.{w'} (iSup f) ≤ lift.{w} (iSup f') := by
rw [lift_iSup hf, lift_iSup hf']
exact ciSup_mono' (bddAbove_range_comp.{_,_,w} hf' _) fun i => ⟨_, h i⟩
/-- A variant of `lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup` with universes specialized via `w = v` and `w' = v'`.
This is sometimes necessary to avoid universe unification issues. -/
theorem lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup' {ι : Type v} {ι' : Type v'} {f : ι → Cardinal.{v}}
{f' : ι' → Cardinal.{v'}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) (hf' : BddAbove (range f')) (g : ι → ι')
(h : ∀ i, lift.{v'} (f i) ≤ lift.{v} (f' (g i))) : lift.{v'} (iSup f) ≤ lift.{v} (iSup f') :=
lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup hf hf' h
/-! ### Properties about the cast from `ℕ` -/
theorem mk_finset_of_fintype [Fintype α] : #(Finset α) = 2 ^ Fintype.card α := by
simp [Pow.pow]
@[norm_cast]
theorem nat_succ (n : ℕ) : (n.succ : Cardinal) = succ ↑n := by
rw [Nat.cast_succ]
refine (add_one_le_succ _).antisymm (succ_le_of_lt ?_)
rw [← Nat.cast_succ]
exact Nat.cast_lt.2 (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
lemma succ_natCast (n : ℕ) : Order.succ (n : Cardinal) = n + 1 := by
rw [← Cardinal.nat_succ]
norm_cast
lemma natCast_add_one_le_iff {n : ℕ} {c : Cardinal} : n + 1 ≤ c ↔ n < c := by
rw [← Order.succ_le_iff, Cardinal.succ_natCast]
lemma two_le_iff_one_lt {c : Cardinal} : 2 ≤ c ↔ 1 < c := by
convert natCast_add_one_le_iff
norm_cast
@[simp]
theorem succ_zero : succ (0 : Cardinal) = 1 := by norm_cast
-- This works generally to prove inequalities between numeric cardinals.
theorem one_lt_two : (1 : Cardinal) < 2 := by norm_cast
theorem exists_finset_le_card (α : Type*) (n : ℕ) (h : n ≤ #α) :
∃ s : Finset α, n ≤ s.card := by
obtain hα|hα := finite_or_infinite α
· let hα := Fintype.ofFinite α
use Finset.univ
simpa only [mk_fintype, Nat.cast_le] using h
· obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := Infinite.exists_subset_card_eq α n
exact ⟨s, hs.ge⟩
theorem card_le_of {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} (H : ∀ s : Finset α, s.card ≤ n) : #α ≤ n := by
contrapose! H
apply exists_finset_le_card α (n+1)
simpa only [nat_succ, succ_le_iff] using H
theorem cantor' (a) {b : Cardinal} (hb : 1 < b) : a < b ^ a := by
rw [← succ_le_iff, (by norm_cast : succ (1 : Cardinal) = 2)] at hb
exact (cantor a).trans_le (power_le_power_right hb)
theorem one_le_iff_pos {c : Cardinal} : 1 ≤ c ↔ 0 < c := by
rw [← succ_zero, succ_le_iff]
theorem one_le_iff_ne_zero {c : Cardinal} : 1 ≤ c ↔ c ≠ 0 := by
rw [one_le_iff_pos, pos_iff_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem lt_one_iff_zero {c : Cardinal} : c < 1 ↔ c = 0 := by
simpa using lt_succ_bot_iff (a := c)
/-! ### Properties about `aleph0` -/
theorem nat_lt_aleph0 (n : ℕ) : (n : Cardinal.{u}) < ℵ₀ :=
succ_le_iff.1
(by
rw [← nat_succ, ← lift_mk_fin, aleph0, lift_mk_le.{u}]
exact ⟨⟨(↑), fun a b => Fin.ext⟩⟩)
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_aleph0 : 1 < ℵ₀ := by simpa using nat_lt_aleph0 1
@[simp]
theorem one_le_aleph0 : 1 ≤ ℵ₀ :=
one_lt_aleph0.le
theorem lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} : c < ℵ₀ ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, c = n :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases lt_lift_iff.1 h with ⟨c, h', rfl⟩
rcases le_mk_iff_exists_set.1 h'.1 with ⟨S, rfl⟩
suffices S.Finite by
lift S to Finset ℕ using this
simp
contrapose! h'
haveI := Infinite.to_subtype h'
exact ⟨Infinite.natEmbedding S⟩, fun ⟨_, e⟩ => e.symm ▸ nat_lt_aleph0 _⟩
lemma succ_eq_of_lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} (h : c < ℵ₀) : Order.succ c = c + 1 := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := Cardinal.lt_aleph0.mp h
rw [hn, succ_natCast]
theorem aleph0_le {c : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ c ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ↑n ≤ c :=
⟨fun h _ => (nat_lt_aleph0 _).le.trans h, fun h =>
le_of_not_lt fun hn => by
rcases lt_aleph0.1 hn with ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact (Nat.lt_succ_self _).not_le (Nat.cast_le.1 (h (n + 1)))⟩
theorem isSuccPrelimit_aleph0 : IsSuccPrelimit ℵ₀ :=
isSuccPrelimit_of_succ_lt fun a ha => by
rcases lt_aleph0.1 ha with ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [← nat_succ]
apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem isSuccLimit_aleph0 : IsSuccLimit ℵ₀ := by
rw [Cardinal.isSuccLimit_iff]
exact ⟨aleph0_ne_zero, isSuccPrelimit_aleph0⟩
lemma not_isSuccLimit_natCast : (n : ℕ) → ¬ IsSuccLimit (n : Cardinal.{u})
| 0, e => e.1 isMin_bot
| Nat.succ n, e => Order.not_isSuccPrelimit_succ _ (nat_succ n ▸ e.2)
theorem not_isSuccLimit_of_lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} (h : c < ℵ₀) : ¬ IsSuccLimit c := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_aleph0.1 h
exact not_isSuccLimit_natCast n
theorem aleph0_le_of_isSuccLimit {c : Cardinal} (h : IsSuccLimit c) : ℵ₀ ≤ c := by
contrapose! h
exact not_isSuccLimit_of_lt_aleph0 h
theorem isStrongLimit_aleph0 : IsStrongLimit ℵ₀ := by
refine ⟨aleph0_ne_zero, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_aleph0.1 hx
exact_mod_cast nat_lt_aleph0 _
theorem IsStrongLimit.aleph0_le {c} (H : IsStrongLimit c) : ℵ₀ ≤ c :=
aleph0_le_of_isSuccLimit H.isSuccLimit
lemma exists_eq_natCast_of_iSup_eq {ι : Type u} [Nonempty ι] (f : ι → Cardinal.{v})
(hf : BddAbove (range f)) (n : ℕ) (h : ⨆ i, f i = n) : ∃ i, f i = n :=
exists_eq_of_iSup_eq_of_not_isSuccLimit.{u, v} f hf (not_isSuccLimit_natCast n) h
@[simp]
theorem range_natCast : range ((↑) : ℕ → Cardinal) = Iio ℵ₀ :=
ext fun x => by simp only [mem_Iio, mem_range, eq_comm, lt_aleph0]
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} : #α = n ↔ Nonempty (α ≃ Fin n) := by
rw [← lift_mk_fin, ← lift_uzero #α, lift_mk_eq']
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_finite {α : Type u} : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Finite α := by
simp only [lt_aleph0, mk_eq_nat_iff, finite_iff_exists_equiv_fin]
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_fintype {α : Type u} : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Nonempty (Fintype α) :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.trans (finite_iff_nonempty_fintype _)
theorem lt_aleph0_of_finite (α : Type u) [Finite α] : #α < ℵ₀ :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.2 ‹_›
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite {S : Set α} : #S < ℵ₀ ↔ S.Finite :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.trans finite_coe_iff
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Finite.lt_aleph0⟩ := lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite
@[simp]
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_subtype_finite {p : α → Prop} : #{ x // p x } < ℵ₀ ↔ { x | p x }.Finite :=
lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite
theorem mk_le_aleph0_iff : #α ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ Countable α := by
rw [countable_iff_nonempty_embedding, aleph0, ← lift_uzero #α, lift_mk_le']
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_aleph0 [Countable α] : #α ≤ ℵ₀ :=
mk_le_aleph0_iff.mpr ‹_›
theorem le_aleph0_iff_set_countable {s : Set α} : #s ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ s.Countable := mk_le_aleph0_iff
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Countable.le_aleph0⟩ := le_aleph0_iff_set_countable
@[simp]
theorem le_aleph0_iff_subtype_countable {p : α → Prop} :
#{ x // p x } ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ { x | p x }.Countable :=
le_aleph0_iff_set_countable
theorem aleph0_lt_mk_iff : ℵ₀ < #α ↔ Uncountable α := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_countable_iff, not_iff_not, mk_le_aleph0_iff]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_lt_mk [Uncountable α] : ℵ₀ < #α :=
aleph0_lt_mk_iff.mpr ‹_›
instance canLiftCardinalNat : CanLift Cardinal ℕ (↑) fun x => x < ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun _ hx =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := lt_aleph0.mp hx
⟨n, hn.symm⟩⟩
theorem add_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a + b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [← Nat.cast_add]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem add_lt_aleph0_iff {a b : Cardinal} : a + b < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(self_le_add_right _ _).trans_lt h, (self_le_add_left _ _).trans_lt h⟩,
fun ⟨h1, h2⟩ => add_lt_aleph0 h1 h2⟩
theorem aleph0_le_add_iff {a b : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ a + b ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ b := by
simp only [← not_lt, add_lt_aleph0_iff, not_and_or]
/-- See also `Cardinal.nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero` if you already have `n ≠ 0`. -/
theorem nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff {n : ℕ} {a : Cardinal} : n • a < ℵ₀ ↔ n = 0 ∨ a < ℵ₀ := by
cases n with
| zero => simpa using nat_lt_aleph0 0
| succ n =>
simp only [Nat.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
induction' n with n ih
· simp
rw [succ_nsmul, add_lt_aleph0_iff, ih, and_self_iff]
/-- See also `Cardinal.nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff` for a hypothesis-free version. -/
theorem nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} {a : Cardinal} (h : n ≠ 0) : n • a < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ :=
nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff.trans <| or_iff_right h
theorem mul_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a * b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [← Nat.cast_mul]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem mul_lt_aleph0_iff {a b : Cardinal} : a * b < ℵ₀ ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 ∨ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· by_cases ha : a = 0
· exact Or.inl ha
right
by_cases hb : b = 0
· exact Or.inl hb
right
rw [← Ne, ← one_le_iff_ne_zero] at ha hb
constructor
· rw [← mul_one a]
exact (mul_le_mul' le_rfl hb).trans_lt h
· rw [← one_mul b]
exact (mul_le_mul' ha le_rfl).trans_lt h
rintro (rfl | rfl | ⟨ha, hb⟩) <;> simp only [*, mul_lt_aleph0, aleph0_pos, zero_mul, mul_zero]
/-- See also `Cardinal.aleph0_le_mul_iff`. -/
theorem aleph0_le_mul_iff {a b : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ a * b ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ 0 ∧ (ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ b) := by
let h := (@mul_lt_aleph0_iff a b).not
rwa [not_lt, not_or, not_or, not_and_or, not_lt, not_lt] at h
/-- See also `Cardinal.aleph0_le_mul_iff'`. -/
theorem aleph0_le_mul_iff' {a b : Cardinal.{u}} : ℵ₀ ≤ a * b ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∧ b ≠ 0 := by
have : ∀ {a : Cardinal.{u}}, ℵ₀ ≤ a → a ≠ 0 := fun a => ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot aleph0_ne_zero a
simp only [aleph0_le_mul_iff, and_or_left, and_iff_right_of_imp this, @and_left_comm (a ≠ 0)]
simp only [and_comm, or_comm]
theorem mul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a * b < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ := by simp [mul_lt_aleph0_iff, ha, hb]
theorem power_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a ^ b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [power_natCast, ← Nat.cast_pow]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem eq_one_iff_unique {α : Type*} : #α = 1 ↔ Subsingleton α ∧ Nonempty α :=
calc
#α = 1 ↔ #α ≤ 1 ∧ 1 ≤ #α := le_antisymm_iff
_ ↔ Subsingleton α ∧ Nonempty α :=
le_one_iff_subsingleton.and (one_le_iff_ne_zero.trans mk_ne_zero_iff)
theorem infinite_iff {α : Type u} : Infinite α ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ #α := by
rw [← not_lt, lt_aleph0_iff_finite, not_finite_iff_infinite]
lemma aleph0_le_mk_iff : ℵ₀ ≤ #α ↔ Infinite α := infinite_iff.symm
lemma mk_lt_aleph0_iff : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Finite α := by simp [← not_le, aleph0_le_mk_iff]
@[simp] lemma mk_lt_aleph0 [Finite α] : #α < ℵ₀ := mk_lt_aleph0_iff.2 ‹_›
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_le_mk (α : Type u) [Infinite α] : ℵ₀ ≤ #α :=
infinite_iff.1 ‹_›
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_aleph0 (α : Type*) [Countable α] [Infinite α] : #α = ℵ₀ :=
mk_le_aleph0.antisymm <| aleph0_le_mk _
theorem denumerable_iff {α : Type u} : Nonempty (Denumerable α) ↔ #α = ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => mk_congr ((@Denumerable.eqv α h).trans Equiv.ulift.symm), fun h => by
obtain ⟨f⟩ := Quotient.exact h
exact ⟨Denumerable.mk' <| f.trans Equiv.ulift⟩⟩
theorem mk_denumerable (α : Type u) [Denumerable α] : #α = ℵ₀ :=
denumerable_iff.1 ⟨‹_›⟩
theorem _root_.Set.countable_infinite_iff_nonempty_denumerable {α : Type*} {s : Set α} :
s.Countable ∧ s.Infinite ↔ Nonempty (Denumerable s) := by
rw [nonempty_denumerable_iff, ← Set.infinite_coe_iff, countable_coe_iff]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_aleph0 : ℵ₀ + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable _
theorem aleph0_mul_aleph0 : ℵ₀ * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable _
@[simp]
theorem nat_mul_aleph0 {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : ↑n * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
le_antisymm (lift_mk_fin n ▸ mk_le_aleph0) <|
le_mul_of_one_le_left (zero_le _) <| by
rwa [← Nat.cast_one, Nat.cast_le, Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_mul_nat {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : ℵ₀ * n = ℵ₀ := by rw [mul_comm, nat_mul_aleph0 hn]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_mul_aleph0 {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ofNat(n) * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
nat_mul_aleph0 (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_mul_ofNat {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ℵ₀ * ofNat(n) = ℵ₀ :=
aleph0_mul_nat (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp]
theorem add_le_aleph0 {c₁ c₂ : Cardinal} : c₁ + c₂ ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ c₁ ≤ ℵ₀ ∧ c₂ ≤ ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨le_self_add.trans h, le_add_self.trans h⟩, fun h =>
aleph0_add_aleph0 ▸ add_le_add h.1 h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_nat (n : ℕ) : ℵ₀ + n = ℵ₀ :=
(add_le_aleph0.2 ⟨le_rfl, (nat_lt_aleph0 n).le⟩).antisymm le_self_add
@[simp]
theorem nat_add_aleph0 (n : ℕ) : ↑n + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ := by rw [add_comm, aleph0_add_nat]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_add_aleph0 {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ofNat(n) + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
nat_add_aleph0 n
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_ofNat {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ℵ₀ + ofNat(n) = ℵ₀ :=
aleph0_add_nat n
theorem exists_nat_eq_of_le_nat {c : Cardinal} {n : ℕ} (h : c ≤ n) : ∃ m, m ≤ n ∧ c = m := by
lift c to ℕ using h.trans_lt (nat_lt_aleph0 _)
exact ⟨c, mod_cast h, rfl⟩
theorem mk_int : #ℤ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable ℤ
theorem mk_pnat : #ℕ+ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable ℕ+
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")]
alias mk_pNat := mk_pnat
/-! ### Cardinalities of basic sets and types -/
|
@[simp] theorem mk_additive : #(Additive α) = #α := rfl
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Basic.lean | 592 | 594 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Thomas Browning. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Multiset
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Nat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.TypeTags.Finite
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Enumerative.Partition
import Mathlib.Data.List.Rotate
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Closure
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Cycle.Factors
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.GCD
/-!
# Cycle Types
In this file we define the cycle type of a permutation.
## Main definitions
- `Equiv.Perm.cycleType σ` where `σ` is a permutation of a `Fintype`
- `Equiv.Perm.partition σ` where `σ` is a permutation of a `Fintype`
## Main results
- `sum_cycleType` : The sum of `σ.cycleType` equals `σ.support.card`
- `lcm_cycleType` : The lcm of `σ.cycleType` equals `orderOf σ`
- `isConj_iff_cycleType_eq` : Two permutations are conjugate if and only if they have the same
cycle type.
- `exists_prime_orderOf_dvd_card`: For every prime `p` dividing the order of a finite group `G`
there exists an element of order `p` in `G`. This is known as Cauchy's theorem.
-/
open scoped Finset
namespace Equiv.Perm
open List (Vector)
open Equiv List Multiset
variable {α : Type*} [Fintype α]
section CycleType
variable [DecidableEq α]
/-- The cycle type of a permutation -/
def cycleType (σ : Perm α) : Multiset ℕ :=
σ.cycleFactorsFinset.1.map (Finset.card ∘ support)
theorem cycleType_def (σ : Perm α) :
σ.cycleType = σ.cycleFactorsFinset.1.map (Finset.card ∘ support) :=
rfl
theorem cycleType_eq' {σ : Perm α} (s : Finset (Perm α)) (h1 : ∀ f : Perm α, f ∈ s → f.IsCycle)
(h2 : (s : Set (Perm α)).Pairwise Disjoint)
(h0 : s.noncommProd id (h2.imp fun _ _ => Disjoint.commute) = σ) :
σ.cycleType = s.1.map (Finset.card ∘ support) := by
rw [cycleType_def]
congr
rw [cycleFactorsFinset_eq_finset]
exact ⟨h1, h2, h0⟩
theorem cycleType_eq {σ : Perm α} (l : List (Perm α)) (h0 : l.prod = σ)
(h1 : ∀ σ : Perm α, σ ∈ l → σ.IsCycle) (h2 : l.Pairwise Disjoint) :
σ.cycleType = l.map (Finset.card ∘ support) := by
have hl : l.Nodup := nodup_of_pairwise_disjoint_cycles h1 h2
rw [cycleType_eq' l.toFinset]
· simp [List.dedup_eq_self.mpr hl, Function.comp_def]
· simpa using h1
· simpa [hl] using h2
· simp [hl, h0]
theorem CycleType.count_def {σ : Perm α} (n : ℕ) :
σ.cycleType.count n =
Fintype.card {c : σ.cycleFactorsFinset // #(c : Perm α).support = n } := by
-- work on the LHS
rw [cycleType, Multiset.count_eq_card_filter_eq]
-- rewrite the `Fintype.card` as a `Finset.card`
rw [Fintype.subtype_card, Finset.univ_eq_attach, Finset.filter_attach',
Finset.card_map, Finset.card_attach]
simp only [Function.comp_apply, Finset.card, Finset.filter_val,
Multiset.filter_map, Multiset.card_map]
congr 1
apply Multiset.filter_congr
intro d h
simp only [Function.comp_apply, eq_comm, Finset.mem_val.mp h, exists_const]
@[simp]
theorem cycleType_eq_zero {σ : Perm α} : σ.cycleType = 0 ↔ σ = 1 := by
simp [cycleType_def, cycleFactorsFinset_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem cycleType_one : (1 : Perm α).cycleType = 0 := cycleType_eq_zero.2 rfl
theorem card_cycleType_eq_zero {σ : Perm α} : Multiset.card σ.cycleType = 0 ↔ σ = 1 := by
rw [card_eq_zero, cycleType_eq_zero]
theorem card_cycleType_pos {σ : Perm α} : 0 < Multiset.card σ.cycleType ↔ σ ≠ 1 :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans card_cycleType_eq_zero.not
theorem two_le_of_mem_cycleType {σ : Perm α} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ σ.cycleType) : 2 ≤ n := by
simp only [cycleType_def, ← Finset.mem_def, Function.comp_apply, Multiset.mem_map,
mem_cycleFactorsFinset_iff] at h
obtain ⟨_, ⟨hc, -⟩, rfl⟩ := h
exact hc.two_le_card_support
theorem one_lt_of_mem_cycleType {σ : Perm α} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ σ.cycleType) : 1 < n :=
two_le_of_mem_cycleType h
theorem IsCycle.cycleType {σ : Perm α} (hσ : IsCycle σ) : σ.cycleType = {#σ.support} :=
cycleType_eq [σ] (mul_one σ) (fun _τ hτ => (congr_arg IsCycle (List.mem_singleton.mp hτ)).mpr hσ)
(List.pairwise_singleton Disjoint σ)
theorem card_cycleType_eq_one {σ : Perm α} : Multiset.card σ.cycleType = 1 ↔ σ.IsCycle := by
rw [card_eq_one]
simp_rw [cycleType_def, Multiset.map_eq_singleton, ← Finset.singleton_val, Finset.val_inj,
cycleFactorsFinset_eq_singleton_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, _, ⟨h, -⟩, -⟩
exact h
· intro h
use #σ.support, σ
simp [h]
theorem Disjoint.cycleType {σ τ : Perm α} (h : Disjoint σ τ) :
(σ * τ).cycleType = σ.cycleType + τ.cycleType := by
rw [cycleType_def, cycleType_def, cycleType_def, h.cycleFactorsFinset_mul_eq_union, ←
Multiset.map_add, Finset.union_val, Multiset.add_eq_union_iff_disjoint.mpr _]
exact Finset.disjoint_val.2 h.disjoint_cycleFactorsFinset
@[simp]
theorem cycleType_inv (σ : Perm α) : σ⁻¹.cycleType = σ.cycleType :=
cycle_induction_on (P := fun τ : Perm α => τ⁻¹.cycleType = τ.cycleType) σ rfl
(fun σ hσ => by simp only [hσ.cycleType, hσ.inv.cycleType, support_inv])
fun σ τ hστ _ hσ hτ => by
simp only [mul_inv_rev, hστ.cycleType, hστ.symm.inv_left.inv_right.cycleType, hσ, hτ,
add_comm]
@[simp]
theorem cycleType_conj {σ τ : Perm α} : (τ * σ * τ⁻¹).cycleType = σ.cycleType := by
induction σ using cycle_induction_on with
| base_one => simp
| base_cycles σ hσ => rw [hσ.cycleType, hσ.conj.cycleType, card_support_conj]
| induction_disjoint σ π hd _ hσ hπ =>
rw [← conj_mul, hd.cycleType, (hd.conj _).cycleType, hσ, hπ]
theorem sum_cycleType (σ : Perm α) : σ.cycleType.sum = #σ.support := by
induction σ using cycle_induction_on with
| base_one => simp
| base_cycles σ hσ => rw [hσ.cycleType, Multiset.sum_singleton]
| induction_disjoint σ τ hd _ hσ hτ => rw [hd.cycleType, sum_add, hσ, hτ, hd.card_support_mul]
theorem card_fixedPoints (σ : Equiv.Perm α) :
Fintype.card (Function.fixedPoints σ) = Fintype.card α - σ.cycleType.sum := by
rw [Equiv.Perm.sum_cycleType, ← Finset.card_compl, Fintype.card_ofFinset]
congr; aesop
theorem sign_of_cycleType' (σ : Perm α) :
sign σ = (σ.cycleType.map fun n => -(-1 : ℤˣ) ^ n).prod := by
induction σ using cycle_induction_on with
| base_one => simp
| base_cycles σ hσ => simp [hσ.cycleType, hσ.sign]
| induction_disjoint σ τ hd _ hσ hτ => simp [hσ, hτ, hd.cycleType]
theorem sign_of_cycleType (f : Perm α) :
sign f = (-1 : ℤˣ) ^ (f.cycleType.sum + Multiset.card f.cycleType) := by
rw [sign_of_cycleType']
induction' f.cycleType using Multiset.induction_on with a s ihs
· rfl
· rw [Multiset.map_cons, Multiset.prod_cons, Multiset.sum_cons, Multiset.card_cons, ihs]
simp only [pow_add, pow_one, mul_neg_one, neg_mul, mul_neg, mul_assoc, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem lcm_cycleType (σ : Perm α) : σ.cycleType.lcm = orderOf σ := by
induction σ using cycle_induction_on with
| base_one => simp
| base_cycles σ hσ => simp [hσ.cycleType, hσ.orderOf]
| induction_disjoint σ τ hd _ hσ hτ => simp [hd.cycleType, hd.orderOf, lcm_eq_nat_lcm, hσ, hτ]
theorem dvd_of_mem_cycleType {σ : Perm α} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ σ.cycleType) : n ∣ orderOf σ := by
rw [← lcm_cycleType]
exact dvd_lcm h
theorem orderOf_cycleOf_dvd_orderOf (f : Perm α) (x : α) : orderOf (cycleOf f x) ∣ orderOf f := by
by_cases hx : f x = x
· rw [← cycleOf_eq_one_iff] at hx
simp [hx]
· refine dvd_of_mem_cycleType ?_
rw [cycleType, Multiset.mem_map]
refine ⟨f.cycleOf x, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [← Finset.mem_def, cycleOf_mem_cycleFactorsFinset_iff, mem_support]
· simp [(isCycle_cycleOf _ hx).orderOf]
theorem two_dvd_card_support {σ : Perm α} (hσ : σ ^ 2 = 1) : 2 ∣ #σ.support :=
(congr_arg (Dvd.dvd 2) σ.sum_cycleType).mp
(Multiset.dvd_sum fun n hn => by
rw [_root_.le_antisymm
(Nat.le_of_dvd zero_lt_two <|
(dvd_of_mem_cycleType hn).trans <| orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hσ)
(two_le_of_mem_cycleType hn)])
theorem cycleType_prime_order {σ : Perm α} (hσ : (orderOf σ).Prime) :
∃ n : ℕ, σ.cycleType = Multiset.replicate (n + 1) (orderOf σ) := by
refine ⟨Multiset.card σ.cycleType - 1, eq_replicate.2 ⟨?_, fun n hn ↦ ?_⟩⟩
· rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le]
rw [Nat.succ_le_iff, card_cycleType_pos, Ne, ← orderOf_eq_one_iff]
exact hσ.ne_one
· exact (hσ.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd n (dvd_of_mem_cycleType hn)).resolve_left
(one_lt_of_mem_cycleType hn).ne'
theorem pow_prime_eq_one_iff {σ : Perm α} {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact (Nat.Prime p)] :
σ ^ p = 1 ↔ ∀ c ∈ σ.cycleType, c = p := by
rw [← orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one, ← lcm_cycleType, Multiset.lcm_dvd]
apply forall_congr'
exact fun c ↦ ⟨fun hc h ↦ Or.resolve_left (hp.elim.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd c (hc h))
(Nat.ne_of_lt' (one_lt_of_mem_cycleType h)),
fun hc h ↦ by rw [hc h]⟩
theorem isCycle_of_prime_order {σ : Perm α} (h1 : (orderOf σ).Prime)
(h2 : #σ.support < 2 * orderOf σ) : σ.IsCycle := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := cycleType_prime_order h1
rw [← σ.sum_cycleType, hn, Multiset.sum_replicate, nsmul_eq_mul, Nat.cast_id,
mul_lt_mul_right (orderOf_pos σ), Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff, Nat.lt_succ_iff, Nat.le_zero] at h2
rw [← card_cycleType_eq_one, hn, card_replicate, h2]
theorem cycleType_le_of_mem_cycleFactorsFinset {f g : Perm α} (hf : f ∈ g.cycleFactorsFinset) :
f.cycleType ≤ g.cycleType := by
have hf' := mem_cycleFactorsFinset_iff.1 hf
rw [cycleType_def, cycleType_def, hf'.left.cycleFactorsFinset_eq_singleton]
refine map_le_map ?_
simpa only [Finset.singleton_val, singleton_le, Finset.mem_val] using hf
theorem Disjoint.cycleType_mul {f g : Perm α} (h : f.Disjoint g) :
(f * g).cycleType = f.cycleType + g.cycleType := by
simp only [Perm.cycleType]
rw [h.cycleFactorsFinset_mul_eq_union]
simp only [Finset.union_val, Function.comp_apply]
rw [← Multiset.add_eq_union_iff_disjoint.mpr _, Multiset.map_add]
simp only [Finset.disjoint_val, Disjoint.disjoint_cycleFactorsFinset h]
theorem Disjoint.cycleType_noncommProd {ι : Type*} {k : ι → Perm α} {s : Finset ι}
(hs : Set.Pairwise s fun i j ↦ Disjoint (k i) (k j))
(hs' : Set.Pairwise s fun i j ↦ Commute (k i) (k j) :=
hs.imp (fun _ _ ↦ Perm.Disjoint.commute)) :
(s.noncommProd k hs').cycleType = s.sum fun i ↦ (k i).cycleType := by
classical
induction s using Finset.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert i s hi hrec =>
have hs' : (s : Set ι).Pairwise fun i j ↦ Disjoint (k i) (k j) :=
hs.mono (by simp only [Finset.coe_insert, Set.subset_insert])
rw [Finset.noncommProd_insert_of_not_mem _ _ _ _ hi, Finset.sum_insert hi]
rw [Equiv.Perm.Disjoint.cycleType_mul, hrec hs']
apply disjoint_noncommProd_right
intro j hj
apply hs _ _ (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hj hi).symm <;>
simp only [Finset.coe_insert, Set.mem_insert_iff, Finset.mem_coe, hj, or_true, true_or]
theorem cycleType_mul_inv_mem_cycleFactorsFinset_eq_sub
{f g : Perm α} (hf : f ∈ g.cycleFactorsFinset) :
(g * f⁻¹).cycleType = g.cycleType - f.cycleType :=
add_right_cancel (b := f.cycleType) <| by
rw [← (disjoint_mul_inv_of_mem_cycleFactorsFinset hf).cycleType, inv_mul_cancel_right,
tsub_add_cancel_of_le (cycleType_le_of_mem_cycleFactorsFinset hf)]
theorem isConj_of_cycleType_eq {σ τ : Perm α} (h : cycleType σ = cycleType τ) : IsConj σ τ := by
induction σ using cycle_induction_on generalizing τ with
| base_one =>
rw [cycleType_one, eq_comm, cycleType_eq_zero] at h
rw [h]
| base_cycles σ hσ =>
have hτ := card_cycleType_eq_one.2 hσ
rw [h, card_cycleType_eq_one] at hτ
apply hσ.isConj hτ
rwa [hσ.cycleType, hτ.cycleType, Multiset.singleton_inj] at h
| induction_disjoint σ π hd hc hσ hπ =>
rw [hd.cycleType] at h
have h' : #σ.support ∈ τ.cycleType := by
simp [← h, hc.cycleType]
obtain ⟨σ', hσ'l, hσ'⟩ := Multiset.mem_map.mp h'
have key : IsConj (σ' * τ * σ'⁻¹) τ := (isConj_iff.2 ⟨σ', rfl⟩).symm
refine IsConj.trans ?_ key
rw [mul_assoc]
have hs : σ.cycleType = σ'.cycleType := by
rw [← Finset.mem_def, mem_cycleFactorsFinset_iff] at hσ'l
rw [hc.cycleType, ← hσ', hσ'l.left.cycleType]; rfl
refine hd.isConj_mul (hσ hs) (hπ ?_) ?_
· rw [cycleType_mul_inv_mem_cycleFactorsFinset_eq_sub, ← h, add_comm, hs,
add_tsub_cancel_right]
rwa [Finset.mem_def]
· exact (disjoint_mul_inv_of_mem_cycleFactorsFinset hσ'l).symm
theorem isConj_iff_cycleType_eq {σ τ : Perm α} : IsConj σ τ ↔ σ.cycleType = τ.cycleType :=
⟨fun h => by
obtain ⟨π, rfl⟩ := isConj_iff.1 h
rw [cycleType_conj], isConj_of_cycleType_eq⟩
@[simp]
theorem cycleType_extendDomain {β : Type*} [Fintype β] [DecidableEq β] {p : β → Prop}
[DecidablePred p] (f : α ≃ Subtype p) {g : Perm α} :
cycleType (g.extendDomain f) = cycleType g := by
induction g using cycle_induction_on with
| base_one => rw [extendDomain_one, cycleType_one, cycleType_one]
| base_cycles σ hσ =>
rw [(hσ.extendDomain f).cycleType, hσ.cycleType, card_support_extend_domain]
| induction_disjoint σ τ hd _ hσ hτ =>
rw [hd.cycleType, ← extendDomain_mul, (hd.extendDomain f).cycleType, hσ, hτ]
theorem cycleType_ofSubtype {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {g : Perm (Subtype p)} :
cycleType (ofSubtype g) = cycleType g :=
cycleType_extendDomain (Equiv.refl (Subtype p))
theorem mem_cycleType_iff {n : ℕ} {σ : Perm α} :
n ∈ cycleType σ ↔ ∃ c τ, σ = c * τ ∧ Disjoint c τ ∧ IsCycle c ∧ c.support.card = n := by
constructor
· intro h
obtain ⟨l, rfl, hlc, hld⟩ := truncCycleFactors σ
rw [cycleType_eq _ rfl hlc hld, Multiset.mem_coe, List.mem_map] at h
obtain ⟨c, cl, rfl⟩ := h
rw [(List.perm_cons_erase cl).pairwise_iff @(Disjoint.symmetric)] at hld
refine ⟨c, (l.erase c).prod, ?_, ?_, hlc _ cl, rfl⟩
· rw [← List.prod_cons, (List.perm_cons_erase cl).symm.prod_eq' (hld.imp Disjoint.commute)]
· exact disjoint_prod_right _ fun g => List.rel_of_pairwise_cons hld
· rintro ⟨c, t, rfl, hd, hc, rfl⟩
simp [hd.cycleType, hc.cycleType]
theorem le_card_support_of_mem_cycleType {n : ℕ} {σ : Perm α} (h : n ∈ cycleType σ) :
n ≤ #σ.support :=
(le_sum_of_mem h).trans (le_of_eq σ.sum_cycleType)
theorem cycleType_of_card_le_mem_cycleType_add_two {n : ℕ} {g : Perm α}
(hn2 : Fintype.card α < n + 2) (hng : n ∈ g.cycleType) : g.cycleType = {n} := by
obtain ⟨c, g', rfl, hd, hc, rfl⟩ := mem_cycleType_iff.1 hng
suffices g'1 : g' = 1 by
rw [hd.cycleType, hc.cycleType, g'1, cycleType_one, add_zero]
contrapose! hn2 with g'1
apply le_trans _ (c * g').support.card_le_univ
rw [hd.card_support_mul]
exact add_le_add_left (two_le_card_support_of_ne_one g'1) _
end CycleType
theorem card_compl_support_modEq [DecidableEq α] {p n : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime] {σ : Perm α}
(hσ : σ ^ p ^ n = 1) : σ.supportᶜ.card ≡ Fintype.card α [MOD p] := by
rw [Nat.modEq_iff_dvd', ← Finset.card_compl, compl_compl, ← sum_cycleType]
· refine Multiset.dvd_sum fun k hk => ?_
obtain ⟨m, -, hm⟩ := (Nat.dvd_prime_pow hp.out).mp (orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hσ)
obtain ⟨l, -, rfl⟩ := (Nat.dvd_prime_pow hp.out).mp
((congr_arg _ hm).mp (dvd_of_mem_cycleType hk))
exact dvd_pow_self _ fun h => (one_lt_of_mem_cycleType hk).ne <| by rw [h, pow_zero]
· exact Finset.card_le_univ _
open Function in
/-- The number of fixed points of a `p ^ n`-th root of the identity function over a finite set
and the set's cardinality have the same residue modulo `p`, where `p` is a prime. -/
theorem card_fixedPoints_modEq [DecidableEq α] {f : Function.End α} {p n : ℕ}
[hp : Fact p.Prime] (hf : f ^ p ^ n = 1) :
Fintype.card α ≡ Fintype.card f.fixedPoints [MOD p] := by
let σ : α ≃ α := ⟨f, f ^ (p ^ n - 1),
leftInverse_iff_comp.mpr ((pow_sub_mul_pow f (Nat.one_le_pow n p hp.out.pos)).trans hf),
leftInverse_iff_comp.mpr ((pow_mul_pow_sub f (Nat.one_le_pow n p hp.out.pos)).trans hf)⟩
have hσ : σ ^ p ^ n = 1 := by
rw [DFunLike.ext'_iff, coe_pow]
exact (hom_coe_pow (fun g : Function.End α ↦ g) rfl (fun g h ↦ rfl) f (p ^ n)).symm.trans hf
suffices Fintype.card f.fixedPoints = (support σ)ᶜ.card from
this ▸ (card_compl_support_modEq hσ).symm
suffices f.fixedPoints = (support σ)ᶜ by
simp only [this]; apply Fintype.card_coe
simp [σ, Set.ext_iff, IsFixedPt]
theorem exists_fixed_point_of_prime {p n : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime] (hα : ¬p ∣ Fintype.card α)
{σ : Perm α} (hσ : σ ^ p ^ n = 1) : ∃ a : α, σ a = a := by
classical
contrapose! hα
simp_rw [← mem_support, ← Finset.eq_univ_iff_forall] at hα
exact Nat.modEq_zero_iff_dvd.1 ((congr_arg _ (Finset.card_eq_zero.2 (compl_eq_bot.2 hα))).mp
(card_compl_support_modEq hσ).symm)
theorem exists_fixed_point_of_prime' {p n : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime] (hα : p ∣ Fintype.card α)
{σ : Perm α} (hσ : σ ^ p ^ n = 1) {a : α} (ha : σ a = a) : ∃ b : α, σ b = b ∧ b ≠ a := by
classical
have h : ∀ b : α, b ∈ σ.supportᶜ ↔ σ b = b := fun b => by
rw [Finset.mem_compl, mem_support, Classical.not_not]
obtain ⟨b, hb1, hb2⟩ := Finset.exists_ne_of_one_lt_card (hp.out.one_lt.trans_le
(Nat.le_of_dvd (Finset.card_pos.mpr ⟨a, (h a).mpr ha⟩) (Nat.modEq_zero_iff_dvd.mp
((card_compl_support_modEq hσ).trans (Nat.modEq_zero_iff_dvd.mpr hα))))) a
exact ⟨b, (h b).mp hb1, hb2⟩
theorem isCycle_of_prime_order' {σ : Perm α} (h1 : (orderOf σ).Prime)
(h2 : Fintype.card α < 2 * orderOf σ) : σ.IsCycle := by
classical exact isCycle_of_prime_order h1 (lt_of_le_of_lt σ.support.card_le_univ h2)
theorem isCycle_of_prime_order'' {σ : Perm α} (h1 : (Fintype.card α).Prime)
(h2 : orderOf σ = Fintype.card α) : σ.IsCycle :=
isCycle_of_prime_order' ((congr_arg Nat.Prime h2).mpr h1) <| by
rw [← one_mul (Fintype.card α), ← h2, mul_lt_mul_right (orderOf_pos σ)]
exact one_lt_two
section Cauchy
variable (G : Type*) [Group G] (n : ℕ)
/-- The type of vectors with terms from `G`, length `n`, and product equal to `1:G`. -/
def vectorsProdEqOne : Set (List.Vector G n) :=
{ v | v.toList.prod = 1 }
namespace VectorsProdEqOne
theorem mem_iff {n : ℕ} (v : List.Vector G n) : v ∈ vectorsProdEqOne G n ↔ v.toList.prod = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
theorem zero_eq : vectorsProdEqOne G 0 = {Vector.nil} :=
Set.eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem.mpr ⟨Eq.refl (1 : G), fun v _ => v.eq_nil⟩
theorem one_eq : vectorsProdEqOne G 1 = {Vector.nil.cons 1} := by
simp_rw [Set.eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem, mem_iff, List.Vector.toList_singleton,
List.prod_singleton, List.Vector.head_cons, true_and]
exact fun v hv => v.cons_head_tail.symm.trans (congr_arg₂ Vector.cons hv v.tail.eq_nil)
instance zeroUnique : Unique (vectorsProdEqOne G 0) := by
rw [zero_eq]
exact Set.uniqueSingleton Vector.nil
instance oneUnique : Unique (vectorsProdEqOne G 1) := by
rw [one_eq]
exact Set.uniqueSingleton (Vector.nil.cons 1)
/-- Given a vector `v` of length `n`, make a vector of length `n + 1` whose product is `1`,
by appending the inverse of the product of `v`. -/
@[simps]
def vectorEquiv : List.Vector G n ≃ vectorsProdEqOne G (n + 1) where
toFun v := ⟨v.toList.prod⁻¹ ::ᵥ v, by
rw [mem_iff, Vector.toList_cons, List.prod_cons, inv_mul_cancel]⟩
invFun v := v.1.tail
left_inv v := v.tail_cons v.toList.prod⁻¹
right_inv v := Subtype.ext <|
calc
v.1.tail.toList.prod⁻¹ ::ᵥ v.1.tail = v.1.head ::ᵥ v.1.tail :=
congr_arg (· ::ᵥ v.1.tail) <| Eq.symm <| eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left <| by
rw [← List.prod_cons, ← Vector.toList_cons, v.1.cons_head_tail]
exact v.2
_ = v.1 := v.1.cons_head_tail
/-- Given a vector `v` of length `n` whose product is 1, make a vector of length `n - 1`,
by deleting the last entry of `v`. -/
def equivVector : ∀ n, vectorsProdEqOne G n ≃ List.Vector G (n - 1)
| 0 => (ofUnique (vectorsProdEqOne G 0) (vectorsProdEqOne G 1)).trans (vectorEquiv G 0).symm
| (n + 1) => (vectorEquiv G n).symm
instance [Fintype G] : Fintype (vectorsProdEqOne G n) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv (List.Vector G (n - 1)) (equivVector G n).symm
theorem card [Fintype G] : Fintype.card (vectorsProdEqOne G n) = Fintype.card G ^ (n - 1) :=
(Fintype.card_congr (equivVector G n)).trans (card_vector (n - 1))
variable {G n} {g : G}
variable (v : vectorsProdEqOne G n) (j k : ℕ)
/-- Rotate a vector whose product is 1. -/
def rotate : vectorsProdEqOne G n :=
⟨⟨_, (v.1.1.length_rotate k).trans v.1.2⟩, List.prod_rotate_eq_one_of_prod_eq_one v.2 k⟩
theorem rotate_zero : rotate v 0 = v :=
Subtype.ext (Subtype.ext v.1.1.rotate_zero)
theorem rotate_rotate : rotate (rotate v j) k = rotate v (j + k) :=
Subtype.ext (Subtype.ext (v.1.1.rotate_rotate j k))
theorem rotate_length : rotate v n = v :=
Subtype.ext (Subtype.ext ((congr_arg _ v.1.2.symm).trans v.1.1.rotate_length))
end VectorsProdEqOne
-- TODO: Make the `Finite` version of this theorem the default
/-- For every prime `p` dividing the order of a finite group `G` there exists an element of order
`p` in `G`. This is known as Cauchy's theorem. -/
theorem _root_.exists_prime_orderOf_dvd_card {G : Type*} [Group G] [Fintype G] (p : ℕ)
[hp : Fact p.Prime] (hdvd : p ∣ Fintype.card G) : ∃ x : G, orderOf x = p := by
have hp' : p - 1 ≠ 0 := mt tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.mp (not_le_of_lt hp.out.one_lt)
have Scard :=
calc
p ∣ Fintype.card G ^ (p - 1) := hdvd.trans (dvd_pow (dvd_refl _) hp')
_ = Fintype.card (vectorsProdEqOne G p) := (VectorsProdEqOne.card G p).symm
let f : ℕ → vectorsProdEqOne G p → vectorsProdEqOne G p := fun k v =>
VectorsProdEqOne.rotate v k
have hf1 : ∀ v, f 0 v = v := VectorsProdEqOne.rotate_zero
have hf2 : ∀ j k v, f k (f j v) = f (j + k) v := fun j k v =>
VectorsProdEqOne.rotate_rotate v j k
have hf3 : ∀ v, f p v = v := VectorsProdEqOne.rotate_length
let σ :=
Equiv.mk (f 1) (f (p - 1)) (fun s => by rw [hf2, add_tsub_cancel_of_le hp.out.one_lt.le, hf3])
fun s => by rw [hf2, tsub_add_cancel_of_le hp.out.one_lt.le, hf3]
have hσ : ∀ k v, (σ ^ k) v = f k v := fun k =>
Nat.rec (fun v => (hf1 v).symm) (fun k hk v => by
rw [pow_succ, Perm.mul_apply, hk (σ v), Nat.succ_eq_one_add, ← hf2 1 k]
simp only [σ, coe_fn_mk]) k
replace hσ : σ ^ p ^ 1 = 1 := Perm.ext fun v => by rw [pow_one, hσ, hf3, one_apply]
let v₀ : vectorsProdEqOne G p :=
⟨List.Vector.replicate p 1, (List.prod_replicate p 1).trans (one_pow p)⟩
have hv₀ : σ v₀ = v₀ := Subtype.ext (Subtype.ext (List.rotate_replicate (1 : G) p 1))
obtain ⟨v, hv1, hv2⟩ := exists_fixed_point_of_prime' Scard hσ hv₀
refine
Exists.imp (fun g hg => orderOf_eq_prime ?_ fun hg' => hv2 ?_)
(List.rotate_one_eq_self_iff_eq_replicate.mp (Subtype.ext_iff.mp (Subtype.ext_iff.mp hv1)))
· rw [← List.prod_replicate, ← v.1.2, ← hg, show v.val.val.prod = 1 from v.2]
· rw [Subtype.ext_iff_val, Subtype.ext_iff_val, hg, hg', v.1.2]
simp only [v₀, List.Vector.replicate]
-- TODO: Make the `Finite` version of this theorem the default
/-- For every prime `p` dividing the order of a finite additive group `G` there exists an element of
order `p` in `G`. This is the additive version of Cauchy's theorem. -/
theorem _root_.exists_prime_addOrderOf_dvd_card {G : Type*} [AddGroup G] [Fintype G] (p : ℕ)
[Fact p.Prime] (hdvd : p ∣ Fintype.card G) : ∃ x : G, addOrderOf x = p :=
@exists_prime_orderOf_dvd_card (Multiplicative G) _ _ _ _ (by convert hdvd)
attribute [to_additive existing] exists_prime_orderOf_dvd_card
-- TODO: Make the `Finite` version of this theorem the default
/-- For every prime `p` dividing the order of a finite group `G` there exists an element of order
`p` in `G`. This is known as Cauchy's theorem. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.exists_prime_orderOf_dvd_card' {G : Type*} [Group G] [Finite G] (p : ℕ)
[hp : Fact p.Prime] (hdvd : p ∣ Nat.card G) : ∃ x : G, orderOf x = p := by
have := Fintype.ofFinite G
rw [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card] at hdvd
exact exists_prime_orderOf_dvd_card p hdvd
end Cauchy
theorem subgroup_eq_top_of_swap_mem [DecidableEq α] {H : Subgroup (Perm α)}
[d : DecidablePred (· ∈ H)] {τ : Perm α} (h0 : (Fintype.card α).Prime)
(h1 : Fintype.card α ∣ Fintype.card H) (h2 : τ ∈ H) (h3 : IsSwap τ) : H = ⊤ := by
haveI : Fact (Fintype.card α).Prime := ⟨h0⟩
obtain ⟨σ, hσ⟩ := exists_prime_orderOf_dvd_card (Fintype.card α) h1
have hσ1 : orderOf (σ : Perm α) = Fintype.card α := (Subgroup.orderOf_coe σ).trans hσ
have hσ2 : IsCycle ↑σ := isCycle_of_prime_order'' h0 hσ1
have hσ3 : (σ : Perm α).support = ⊤ :=
Finset.eq_univ_of_card (σ : Perm α).support (hσ2.orderOf.symm.trans hσ1)
have hσ4 : Subgroup.closure {↑σ, τ} = ⊤ := closure_prime_cycle_swap h0 hσ2 hσ3 h3
rw [eq_top_iff, ← hσ4, Subgroup.closure_le, Set.insert_subset_iff, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
exact ⟨Subtype.mem σ, h2⟩
section Partition
variable [DecidableEq α]
/-- The partition corresponding to a permutation -/
def partition (σ : Perm α) : (Fintype.card α).Partition where
parts := σ.cycleType + Multiset.replicate (Fintype.card α - #σ.support) 1
parts_pos {n hn} := by
rcases mem_add.mp hn with hn | hn
· exact zero_lt_one.trans (one_lt_of_mem_cycleType hn)
· exact lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (ge_of_eq (Multiset.eq_of_mem_replicate hn))
parts_sum := by
rw [sum_add, sum_cycleType, Multiset.sum_replicate, nsmul_eq_mul, Nat.cast_id, mul_one,
add_tsub_cancel_of_le σ.support.card_le_univ]
| theorem parts_partition {σ : Perm α} :
σ.partition.parts = σ.cycleType + Multiset.replicate (Fintype.card α - #σ.support) 1 :=
rfl
theorem filter_parts_partition_eq_cycleType {σ : Perm α} :
((partition σ).parts.filter fun n => 2 ≤ n) = σ.cycleType := by
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Cycle/Type.lean | 561 | 566 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov, Sébastien Gouëzel, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.FinMeasAdditive
/-!
# Extension of a linear function from indicators to L1
Given `T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` with `DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C`, we construct an extension
of `T` to integrable simple functions, which are finite sums of indicators of measurable sets
with finite measure, then to integrable functions, which are limits of integrable simple functions.
The main result is a continuous linear map `(α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F`.
This extension process is used to define the Bochner integral
in the `Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.Basic` file
and the conditional expectation of an integrable function
in `Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation.CondexpL1`.
## Main definitions
- `setToL1 (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F`: the extension of `T`
from indicators to L1.
- `setToFun μ T (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α → E) : F`: a version of the
extension which applies to functions (with value 0 if the function is not integrable).
## Properties
For most properties of `setToFun`, we provide two lemmas. One version uses hypotheses valid on
all sets, like `T = T'`, and a second version which uses a primed name uses hypotheses on
measurable sets with finite measure, like `∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s`.
The lemmas listed here don't show all hypotheses. Refer to the actual lemmas for details.
Linearity:
- `setToFun_zero_left : setToFun μ 0 hT f = 0`
- `setToFun_add_left : setToFun μ (T + T') _ f = setToFun μ T hT f + setToFun μ T' hT' f`
- `setToFun_smul_left : setToFun μ (fun s ↦ c • (T s)) (hT.smul c) f = c • setToFun μ T hT f`
- `setToFun_zero : setToFun μ T hT (0 : α → E) = 0`
- `setToFun_neg : setToFun μ T hT (-f) = - setToFun μ T hT f`
If `f` and `g` are integrable:
- `setToFun_add : setToFun μ T hT (f + g) = setToFun μ T hT f + setToFun μ T hT g`
- `setToFun_sub : setToFun μ T hT (f - g) = setToFun μ T hT f - setToFun μ T hT g`
If `T` is verifies `∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x`:
- `setToFun_smul : setToFun μ T hT (c • f) = c • setToFun μ T hT f`
Other:
- `setToFun_congr_ae (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : setToFun μ T hT f = setToFun μ T hT g`
- `setToFun_measure_zero (h : μ = 0) : setToFun μ T hT f = 0`
If the space is also an ordered additive group with an order closed topology and `T` is such that
`0 ≤ T s x` for `0 ≤ x`, we also prove order-related properties:
- `setToFun_mono_left (h : ∀ s x, T s x ≤ T' s x) : setToFun μ T hT f ≤ setToFun μ T' hT' f`
- `setToFun_nonneg (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) : 0 ≤ setToFun μ T hT f`
- `setToFun_mono (hfg : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) : setToFun μ T hT f ≤ setToFun μ T hT g`
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Topology NNReal
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace ENNReal
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α E F F' G 𝕜 : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] [NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace ℝ F']
[NormedAddCommGroup G] {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
namespace L1
open AEEqFun Lp.simpleFunc Lp
namespace SimpleFunc
theorem norm_eq_sum_mul (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] G) :
‖f‖ = ∑ x ∈ (toSimpleFunc f).range, μ.real (toSimpleFunc f ⁻¹' {x}) * ‖x‖ := by
rw [norm_toSimpleFunc, eLpNorm_one_eq_lintegral_enorm]
have h_eq := SimpleFunc.map_apply (‖·‖ₑ) (toSimpleFunc f)
simp_rw [← h_eq, measureReal_def]
rw [SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral, SimpleFunc.map_lintegral, ENNReal.toReal_sum]
· congr
ext1 x
rw [ENNReal.toReal_mul, mul_comm, ← ofReal_norm_eq_enorm,
ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (norm_nonneg _)]
· intro x _
by_cases hx0 : x = 0
· rw [hx0]; simp
· exact
ENNReal.mul_ne_top ENNReal.coe_ne_top
(SimpleFunc.measure_preimage_lt_top_of_integrable _ (SimpleFunc.integrable f) hx0).ne
section SetToL1S
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
attribute [local instance] Lp.simpleFunc.module
attribute [local instance] Lp.simpleFunc.normedSpace
/-- Extend `Set α → (E →L[ℝ] F')` to `(α →₁ₛ[μ] E) → F'`. -/
def setToL1S (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : F :=
(toSimpleFunc f).setToSimpleFunc T
theorem setToL1S_eq_setToSimpleFunc (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T f = (toSimpleFunc f).setToSimpleFunc T :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem setToL1S_zero_left (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S (0 : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) f = 0 :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_zero _
theorem setToL1S_zero_left' {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F}
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = 0) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T f = 0 :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_zero' h_zero _ (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_congr (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) {f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E} (h : toSimpleFunc f =ᵐ[μ] toSimpleFunc g) :
setToL1S T f = setToL1S T g :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f) h
theorem setToL1S_congr_left (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F)
(h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T f = setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr_left T T' h (simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f) (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
/-- `setToL1S` does not change if we replace the measure `μ` by `μ'` with `μ ≪ μ'`. The statement
uses two functions `f` and `f'` because they have to belong to different types, but morally these
are the same function (we have `f =ᵐ[μ] f'`). -/
theorem setToL1S_congr_measure {μ' : Measure α} (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0) (h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (hμ : μ ≪ μ')
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) (f' : α →₁ₛ[μ'] E) (h : (f : α → E) =ᵐ[μ] f') :
setToL1S T f = setToL1S T f' := by
refine SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f) ?_
refine (toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun f).trans ?_
suffices (f' : α → E) =ᵐ[μ] simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f' from h.trans this
have goal' : (f' : α → E) =ᵐ[μ'] simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f' := (toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun f').symm
exact hμ.ae_eq goal'
theorem setToL1S_add_left (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S (T + T') f = setToL1S T f + setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_add_left T T'
theorem setToL1S_add_left' (T T' T'' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F)
(h_add : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T'' s = T s + T' s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T'' f = setToL1S T f + setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_add_left' T T' T'' h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_smul_left (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (c : ℝ) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S (fun s => c • T s) f = c • setToL1S T f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_smul_left T c _
theorem setToL1S_smul_left' (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (c : ℝ)
(h_smul : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T' s = c • T s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T' f = c • setToL1S T f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_smul_left' T T' c h_smul (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_add (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T (f + g) = setToL1S T f + setToL1S T g := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
rw [← SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_add T h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
(SimpleFunc.integrable g)]
exact
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _)
(add_toSimpleFunc f g)
theorem setToL1S_neg {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T (-f) = -setToL1S T f := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
have : simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc (-f) =ᵐ[μ] ⇑(-simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f) :=
neg_toSimpleFunc f
rw [SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) this]
exact SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_neg T h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_sub {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T (f - g) = setToL1S T f - setToL1S T g := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, setToL1S_add T h_zero h_add, setToL1S_neg h_zero h_add, sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem setToL1S_smul_real (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0) (h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (c : ℝ)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T (c • f) = c • setToL1S T f := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
rw [← SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_smul_real T h_add c (SimpleFunc.integrable f)]
refine SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) ?_
exact smul_toSimpleFunc c f
theorem setToL1S_smul {E} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
[DistribSMul 𝕜 F] (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) (c : 𝕜)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T (c • f) = c • setToL1S T f := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
rw [← SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_smul T h_add h_smul c (SimpleFunc.integrable f)]
refine SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) ?_
exact smul_toSimpleFunc c f
theorem norm_setToL1S_le (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) {C : ℝ}
(hT_norm : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ‖T s‖ ≤ C * μ.real s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
‖setToL1S T f‖ ≤ C * ‖f‖ := by
rw [setToL1S, norm_eq_sum_mul f]
exact
SimpleFunc.norm_setToSimpleFunc_le_sum_mul_norm_of_integrable T hT_norm _
(SimpleFunc.integrable f)
theorem setToL1S_indicatorConst {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {s : Set α}
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0) (h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s < ∞) (x : E) :
setToL1S T (simpleFunc.indicatorConst 1 hs hμs.ne x) = T s x := by
have h_empty : T ∅ = 0 := h_zero _ MeasurableSet.empty measure_empty
rw [setToL1S_eq_setToSimpleFunc]
refine Eq.trans ?_ (SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_indicator T h_empty hs x)
refine SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr T h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) ?_
exact toSimpleFunc_indicatorConst hs hμs.ne x
theorem setToL1S_const [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F}
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0) (h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T) (x : E) :
setToL1S T (simpleFunc.indicatorConst 1 MeasurableSet.univ (measure_ne_top μ _) x) = T univ x :=
setToL1S_indicatorConst h_zero h_add MeasurableSet.univ (measure_lt_top _ _) x
section Order
variable {G'' G' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup G'] [PartialOrder G'] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G'] [NormedSpace ℝ G']
[NormedAddCommGroup G''] [PartialOrder G''] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G''] [NormedSpace ℝ G'']
{T : Set α → G'' →L[ℝ] G'}
theorem setToL1S_mono_left {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} (hTT' : ∀ s x, T s x ≤ T' s x)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1S T f ≤ setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_mono_left T T' hTT' _
theorem setToL1S_mono_left' {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''}
(hTT' : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1S T f ≤ setToL1S T' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_mono_left' T T' hTT' _ (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
omit [IsOrderedAddMonoid G''] in
theorem setToL1S_nonneg (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f : α →₁ₛ[μ] G''}
(hf : 0 ≤ f) : 0 ≤ setToL1S T f := by
simp_rw [setToL1S]
obtain ⟨f', hf', hff'⟩ := exists_simpleFunc_nonneg_ae_eq hf
replace hff' : simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc f =ᵐ[μ] f' :=
(Lp.simpleFunc.toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun f).trans hff'
rw [SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_congr _ h_zero h_add (SimpleFunc.integrable _) hff']
exact
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_nonneg' T hT_nonneg _ hf' ((SimpleFunc.integrable f).congr hff')
theorem setToL1S_mono (h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s = 0 → T s = 0)
(h_add : FinMeasAdditive μ T)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] G''}
(hfg : f ≤ g) : setToL1S T f ≤ setToL1S T g := by
rw [← sub_nonneg] at hfg ⊢
rw [← setToL1S_sub h_zero h_add]
exact setToL1S_nonneg h_zero h_add hT_nonneg hfg
end Order
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable (α E μ 𝕜)
/-- Extend `Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` to `(α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[𝕜] F`. -/
def setToL1SCLM' {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) : (α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[𝕜] F :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous
⟨⟨setToL1S T, setToL1S_add T (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1⟩,
setToL1S_smul T (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 h_smul⟩
C fun f => norm_setToL1S_le T hT.2 f
/-- Extend `Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` to `(α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F`. -/
def setToL1SCLM {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) :
(α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous
⟨⟨setToL1S T, setToL1S_add T (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1⟩,
setToL1S_smul_real T (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1⟩
C fun f => norm_setToL1S_le T hT.2 f
variable {α E μ 𝕜}
variable {T T' T'' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C C' C'' : ℝ}
@[simp]
theorem setToL1SCLM_zero_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ (0 : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) C)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f = 0 :=
setToL1S_zero_left _
theorem setToL1SCLM_zero_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = 0) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f = 0 :=
setToL1S_zero_left' h_zero f
theorem setToL1SCLM_congr_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (h : T = T') (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
setToL1S_congr_left T T' (fun _ _ _ => by rw [h]) f
theorem setToL1SCLM_congr_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s)
(f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
setToL1S_congr_left T T' h f
theorem setToL1SCLM_congr_measure {μ' : Measure α} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ' T C') (hμ : μ ≪ μ') (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) (f' : α →₁ₛ[μ'] E)
(h : (f : α → E) =ᵐ[μ] f') : setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ' hT' f' :=
setToL1S_congr_measure T (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 hμ _ _ h
theorem setToL1SCLM_add_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.add hT') f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f + setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
setToL1S_add_left T T' f
theorem setToL1SCLM_add_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (hT'' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T'' C'')
(h_add : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T'' s = T s + T' s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT'' f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f + setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
setToL1S_add_left' T T' T'' h_add f
theorem setToL1SCLM_smul_left (c : ℝ) (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.smul c) f = c • setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f :=
setToL1S_smul_left T c f
theorem setToL1SCLM_smul_left' (c : ℝ) (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(h_smul : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T' s = c • T s) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f = c • setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f :=
setToL1S_smul_left' T T' c h_smul f
theorem norm_setToL1SCLM_le {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hC : 0 ≤ C) : ‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ ≤ C :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ hC _
theorem norm_setToL1SCLM_le' {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) :
‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ ≤ max C 0 :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le' _ _
theorem setToL1SCLM_const [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (x : E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT (simpleFunc.indicatorConst 1 MeasurableSet.univ (measure_ne_top μ _) x) =
T univ x :=
setToL1S_const (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 x
section Order
variable {G' G'' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup G''] [PartialOrder G''] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G''] [NormedSpace ℝ G'']
[NormedAddCommGroup G'] [PartialOrder G'] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G'] [NormedSpace ℝ G']
theorem setToL1SCLM_mono_left {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(hTT' : ∀ s x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f ≤ setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_mono_left T T' hTT' _
theorem setToL1SCLM_mono_left' {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(hTT' : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f ≤ setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f :=
SimpleFunc.setToSimpleFunc_mono_left' T T' hTT' _ (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
omit [IsOrderedAddMonoid G'] in
theorem setToL1SCLM_nonneg {T : Set α → G' →L[ℝ] G''} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f : α →₁ₛ[μ] G'}
(hf : 0 ≤ f) : 0 ≤ setToL1SCLM α G' μ hT f :=
setToL1S_nonneg (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 hT_nonneg hf
theorem setToL1SCLM_mono {T : Set α → G' →L[ℝ] G''} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] G'}
(hfg : f ≤ g) : setToL1SCLM α G' μ hT f ≤ setToL1SCLM α G' μ hT g :=
setToL1S_mono (fun _ => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 hT_nonneg hfg
end Order
end SetToL1S
end SimpleFunc
open SimpleFunc
section SetToL1
attribute [local instance] Lp.simpleFunc.module
attribute [local instance] Lp.simpleFunc.normedSpace
variable (𝕜) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [CompleteSpace F]
{T T' T'' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C C' C'' : ℝ}
/-- Extend `Set α → (E →L[ℝ] F)` to `(α →₁[μ] E) →L[𝕜] F`. -/
def setToL1' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[𝕜] F :=
(setToL1SCLM' α E 𝕜 μ hT h_smul).extend (coeToLp α E 𝕜) (simpleFunc.denseRange one_ne_top)
simpleFunc.isUniformInducing
variable {𝕜}
/-- Extend `Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` to `(α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F`. -/
def setToL1 (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] F :=
(setToL1SCLM α E μ hT).extend (coeToLp α E ℝ) (simpleFunc.denseRange one_ne_top)
simpleFunc.isUniformInducing
theorem setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f :=
uniformly_extend_of_ind simpleFunc.isUniformInducing (simpleFunc.denseRange one_ne_top)
(setToL1SCLM α E μ hT).uniformContinuous _
theorem setToL1_eq_setToL1' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT f = setToL1' 𝕜 hT h_smul f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem setToL1_zero_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ (0 : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) C)
(f : α →₁[μ] E) : setToL1 hT f = 0 := by
suffices setToL1 hT = 0 by rw [this]; simp
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
rw [setToL1SCLM_zero_left hT f, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_comp, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_apply]
theorem setToL1_zero_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = 0) (f : α →₁[μ] E) : setToL1 hT f = 0 := by
suffices setToL1 hT = 0 by rw [this]; simp
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
rw [setToL1SCLM_zero_left' hT h_zero f, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_comp,
ContinuousLinearMap.zero_apply]
theorem setToL1_congr_left (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (h : T = T')
(f : α →₁[μ] E) : setToL1 hT f = setToL1 hT' f := by
suffices setToL1 hT = setToL1 hT' by rw [this]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices setToL1 hT' f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f by rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM]
exact setToL1SCLM_congr_left hT' hT h.symm f
theorem setToL1_congr_left' (T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT f = setToL1 hT' f := by
suffices setToL1 hT = setToL1 hT' by rw [this]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices setToL1 hT' f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT f by rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM]
exact (setToL1SCLM_congr_left' hT hT' h f).symm
theorem setToL1_add_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 (hT.add hT') f = setToL1 hT f + setToL1 hT' f := by
suffices setToL1 (hT.add hT') = setToL1 hT + setToL1 hT' by
rw [this, ContinuousLinearMap.add_apply]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.add hT')) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices setToL1 hT f + setToL1 hT' f = setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.add hT') f by
rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM, setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM, setToL1SCLM_add_left hT hT']
theorem setToL1_add_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (hT'' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T'' C'')
(h_add : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T'' s = T s + T' s) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT'' f = setToL1 hT f + setToL1 hT' f := by
suffices setToL1 hT'' = setToL1 hT + setToL1 hT' by rw [this, ContinuousLinearMap.add_apply]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT'') _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices setToL1 hT f + setToL1 hT' f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT'' f by rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM, setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM,
setToL1SCLM_add_left' hT hT' hT'' h_add]
theorem setToL1_smul_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (c : ℝ) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 (hT.smul c) f = c • setToL1 hT f := by
suffices setToL1 (hT.smul c) = c • setToL1 hT by rw [this, ContinuousLinearMap.smul_apply]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.smul c)) _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices c • setToL1 hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ (hT.smul c) f by rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM, setToL1SCLM_smul_left c hT]
theorem setToL1_smul_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (c : ℝ)
(h_smul : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T' s = c • T s) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT' f = c • setToL1 hT f := by
suffices setToL1 hT' = c • setToL1 hT by rw [this, ContinuousLinearMap.smul_apply]
refine ContinuousLinearMap.extend_unique (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT') _ _ _ _ ?_
ext1 f
suffices c • setToL1 hT f = setToL1SCLM α E μ hT' f by rw [← this]; simp [coeToLp]
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM, setToL1SCLM_smul_left' c hT hT' h_smul]
theorem setToL1_smul (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) (c : 𝕜) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT (c • f) = c • setToL1 hT f := by
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1' hT h_smul, setToL1_eq_setToL1' hT h_smul]
exact ContinuousLinearMap.map_smul _ _ _
theorem setToL1_simpleFunc_indicatorConst (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s < ∞) (x : E) :
setToL1 hT (simpleFunc.indicatorConst 1 hs hμs.ne x) = T s x := by
rw [setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM]
exact setToL1S_indicatorConst (fun s => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 hs hμs x
theorem setToL1_indicatorConstLp (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (x : E) :
setToL1 hT (indicatorConstLp 1 hs hμs x) = T s x := by
rw [← Lp.simpleFunc.coe_indicatorConst hs hμs x]
exact setToL1_simpleFunc_indicatorConst hT hs hμs.lt_top x
theorem setToL1_const [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (x : E) :
setToL1 hT (indicatorConstLp 1 MeasurableSet.univ (measure_ne_top _ _) x) = T univ x :=
setToL1_indicatorConstLp hT MeasurableSet.univ (measure_ne_top _ _) x
section Order
variable {G' G'' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup G''] [PartialOrder G''] [OrderClosedTopology G''] [IsOrderedAddMonoid G'']
[NormedSpace ℝ G''] [CompleteSpace G'']
[NormedAddCommGroup G'] [PartialOrder G'] [NormedSpace ℝ G']
theorem setToL1_mono_left' {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(hTT' : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToL1 hT f ≤ setToL1 hT' f := by
induction f using Lp.induction (hp_ne_top := one_ne_top) with
| @indicatorConst c s hs hμs =>
rw [setToL1_simpleFunc_indicatorConst hT hs hμs, setToL1_simpleFunc_indicatorConst hT' hs hμs]
exact hTT' s hs hμs c
| @add f g hf hg _ hf_le hg_le =>
rw [(setToL1 hT).map_add, (setToL1 hT').map_add]
exact add_le_add hf_le hg_le
| isClosed => exact isClosed_le (setToL1 hT).continuous (setToL1 hT').continuous
theorem setToL1_mono_left {T T' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] G''} {C C' : ℝ}
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C')
(hTT' : ∀ s x, T s x ≤ T' s x) (f : α →₁[μ] E) : setToL1 hT f ≤ setToL1 hT' f :=
setToL1_mono_left' hT hT' (fun s _ _ x => hTT' s x) f
theorem setToL1_nonneg {T : Set α → G' →L[ℝ] G''} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f : α →₁[μ] G'}
(hf : 0 ≤ f) : 0 ≤ setToL1 hT f := by
suffices ∀ f : { g : α →₁[μ] G' // 0 ≤ g }, 0 ≤ setToL1 hT f from
this (⟨f, hf⟩ : { g : α →₁[μ] G' // 0 ≤ g })
refine fun g =>
@isClosed_property { g : α →₁ₛ[μ] G' // 0 ≤ g } { g : α →₁[μ] G' // 0 ≤ g } _ _
(fun g => 0 ≤ setToL1 hT g)
(denseRange_coeSimpleFuncNonnegToLpNonneg 1 μ G' one_ne_top) ?_ ?_ g
· exact isClosed_le continuous_zero ((setToL1 hT).continuous.comp continuous_induced_dom)
· intro g
have : (coeSimpleFuncNonnegToLpNonneg 1 μ G' g : α →₁[μ] G') = (g : α →₁ₛ[μ] G') := rfl
rw [this, setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM]
exact setToL1S_nonneg (fun s => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero) hT.1 hT_nonneg g.2
theorem setToL1_mono [IsOrderedAddMonoid G']
{T : Set α → G' →L[ℝ] G''} {C : ℝ} (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT_nonneg : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ∀ x, 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ T s x) {f g : α →₁[μ] G'}
(hfg : f ≤ g) : setToL1 hT f ≤ setToL1 hT g := by
rw [← sub_nonneg] at hfg ⊢
rw [← (setToL1 hT).map_sub]
exact setToL1_nonneg hT hT_nonneg hfg
end Order
theorem norm_setToL1_le_norm_setToL1SCLM (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) :
‖setToL1 hT‖ ≤ ‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ :=
calc
‖setToL1 hT‖ ≤ (1 : ℝ≥0) * ‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ := by
refine
ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_extend_le (setToL1SCLM α E μ hT) (coeToLp α E ℝ)
(simpleFunc.denseRange one_ne_top) fun x => le_of_eq ?_
rw [NNReal.coe_one, one_mul]
simp [coeToLp]
_ = ‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ := by rw [NNReal.coe_one, one_mul]
theorem norm_setToL1_le_mul_norm (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hC : 0 ≤ C)
(f : α →₁[μ] E) : ‖setToL1 hT f‖ ≤ C * ‖f‖ :=
calc
‖setToL1 hT f‖ ≤ ‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ * ‖f‖ :=
ContinuousLinearMap.le_of_opNorm_le _ (norm_setToL1_le_norm_setToL1SCLM hT) _
_ ≤ C * ‖f‖ := mul_le_mul (norm_setToL1SCLM_le hT hC) le_rfl (norm_nonneg _) hC
theorem norm_setToL1_le_mul_norm' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
‖setToL1 hT f‖ ≤ max C 0 * ‖f‖ :=
calc
‖setToL1 hT f‖ ≤ ‖setToL1SCLM α E μ hT‖ * ‖f‖ :=
ContinuousLinearMap.le_of_opNorm_le _ (norm_setToL1_le_norm_setToL1SCLM hT) _
_ ≤ max C 0 * ‖f‖ :=
mul_le_mul (norm_setToL1SCLM_le' hT) le_rfl (norm_nonneg _) (le_max_right _ _)
theorem norm_setToL1_le (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hC : 0 ≤ C) : ‖setToL1 hT‖ ≤ C :=
ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_le_bound _ hC (norm_setToL1_le_mul_norm hT hC)
theorem norm_setToL1_le' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) : ‖setToL1 hT‖ ≤ max C 0 :=
ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_le_bound _ (le_max_right _ _) (norm_setToL1_le_mul_norm' hT)
theorem setToL1_lipschitz (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) :
LipschitzWith (Real.toNNReal C) (setToL1 hT) :=
(setToL1 hT).lipschitz.weaken (norm_setToL1_le' hT)
/-- If `fs i → f` in `L1`, then `setToL1 hT (fs i) → setToL1 hT f`. -/
theorem tendsto_setToL1 (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α →₁[μ] E) {ι}
(fs : ι → α →₁[μ] E) {l : Filter ι} (hfs : Tendsto fs l (𝓝 f)) :
Tendsto (fun i => setToL1 hT (fs i)) l (𝓝 <| setToL1 hT f) :=
((setToL1 hT).continuous.tendsto _).comp hfs
end SetToL1
end L1
section Function
variable [CompleteSpace F] {T T' T'' : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F} {C C' C'' : ℝ} {f g : α → E}
variable (μ T)
open Classical in
/-- Extend `T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F` to `(α → E) → F` (for integrable functions `α → E`). We set it to
0 if the function is not integrable. -/
def setToFun (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α → E) : F :=
if hf : Integrable f μ then L1.setToL1 hT (hf.toL1 f) else 0
variable {μ T}
theorem setToFun_eq (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hf : Integrable f μ) :
setToFun μ T hT f = L1.setToL1 hT (hf.toL1 f) :=
dif_pos hf
theorem L1.setToFun_eq_setToL1 (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
setToFun μ T hT f = L1.setToL1 hT f := by
rw [setToFun_eq hT (L1.integrable_coeFn f), Integrable.toL1_coeFn]
theorem setToFun_undef (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hf : ¬Integrable f μ) :
setToFun μ T hT f = 0 :=
dif_neg hf
theorem setToFun_non_aestronglyMeasurable (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hf : ¬AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) : setToFun μ T hT f = 0 :=
setToFun_undef hT (not_and_of_not_left _ hf)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-09")]
alias setToFun_non_aEStronglyMeasurable := setToFun_non_aestronglyMeasurable
theorem setToFun_congr_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (h : T = T') (f : α → E) :
setToFun μ T hT f = setToFun μ T' hT' f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· simp_rw [setToFun_eq _ hf, L1.setToL1_congr_left T T' hT hT' h]
· simp_rw [setToFun_undef _ hf]
theorem setToFun_congr_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = T' s)
(f : α → E) : setToFun μ T hT f = setToFun μ T' hT' f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· simp_rw [setToFun_eq _ hf, L1.setToL1_congr_left' T T' hT hT' h]
· simp_rw [setToFun_undef _ hf]
theorem setToFun_add_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (f : α → E) :
setToFun μ (T + T') (hT.add hT') f = setToFun μ T hT f + setToFun μ T' hT' f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· simp_rw [setToFun_eq _ hf, L1.setToL1_add_left hT hT']
· simp_rw [setToFun_undef _ hf, add_zero]
theorem setToFun_add_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (hT'' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T'' C'')
(h_add : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T'' s = T s + T' s) (f : α → E) :
setToFun μ T'' hT'' f = setToFun μ T hT f + setToFun μ T' hT' f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· simp_rw [setToFun_eq _ hf, L1.setToL1_add_left' hT hT' hT'' h_add]
· simp_rw [setToFun_undef _ hf, add_zero]
theorem setToFun_smul_left (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (c : ℝ) (f : α → E) :
setToFun μ (fun s => c • T s) (hT.smul c) f = c • setToFun μ T hT f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· simp_rw [setToFun_eq _ hf, L1.setToL1_smul_left hT c]
· simp_rw [setToFun_undef _ hf, smul_zero]
theorem setToFun_smul_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(hT' : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T' C') (c : ℝ)
(h_smul : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T' s = c • T s) (f : α → E) :
setToFun μ T' hT' f = c • setToFun μ T hT f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· simp_rw [setToFun_eq _ hf, L1.setToL1_smul_left' hT hT' c h_smul]
· simp_rw [setToFun_undef _ hf, smul_zero]
@[simp]
theorem setToFun_zero (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) : setToFun μ T hT (0 : α → E) = 0 := by
rw [Pi.zero_def, setToFun_eq hT (integrable_zero _ _ _)]
simp only [← Pi.zero_def]
rw [Integrable.toL1_zero, ContinuousLinearMap.map_zero]
@[simp]
theorem setToFun_zero_left {hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ (0 : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) C} :
setToFun μ 0 hT f = 0 := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· rw [setToFun_eq hT hf]; exact L1.setToL1_zero_left hT _
· exact setToFun_undef hT hf
theorem setToFun_zero_left' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h_zero : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → T s = 0) : setToFun μ T hT f = 0 := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· rw [setToFun_eq hT hf]; exact L1.setToL1_zero_left' hT h_zero _
· exact setToFun_undef hT hf
theorem setToFun_add (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hf : Integrable f μ)
(hg : Integrable g μ) : setToFun μ T hT (f + g) = setToFun μ T hT f + setToFun μ T hT g := by
rw [setToFun_eq hT (hf.add hg), setToFun_eq hT hf, setToFun_eq hT hg, Integrable.toL1_add,
(L1.setToL1 hT).map_add]
theorem setToFun_finset_sum' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {ι} (s : Finset ι)
{f : ι → α → E} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, Integrable (f i) μ) :
setToFun μ T hT (∑ i ∈ s, f i) = ∑ i ∈ s, setToFun μ T hT (f i) := by
classical
revert hf
refine Finset.induction_on s ?_ ?_
· intro _
simp only [setToFun_zero, Finset.sum_empty]
· intro i s his ih hf
simp only [his, Finset.sum_insert, not_false_iff]
rw [setToFun_add hT (hf i (Finset.mem_insert_self i s)) _]
· rw [ih fun i hi => hf i (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)]
· convert integrable_finset_sum s fun i hi => hf i (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi) with x
simp
theorem setToFun_finset_sum (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {ι} (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → α → E}
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, Integrable (f i) μ) :
(setToFun μ T hT fun a => ∑ i ∈ s, f i a) = ∑ i ∈ s, setToFun μ T hT (f i) := by
convert setToFun_finset_sum' hT s hf with a; simp
theorem setToFun_neg (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (f : α → E) :
setToFun μ T hT (-f) = -setToFun μ T hT f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· rw [setToFun_eq hT hf, setToFun_eq hT hf.neg, Integrable.toL1_neg,
(L1.setToL1 hT).map_neg]
· rw [setToFun_undef hT hf, setToFun_undef hT, neg_zero]
rwa [← integrable_neg_iff] at hf
theorem setToFun_sub (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hf : Integrable f μ)
(hg : Integrable g μ) : setToFun μ T hT (f - g) = setToFun μ T hT f - setToFun μ T hT g := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, setToFun_add hT hf hg.neg, setToFun_neg hT g]
theorem setToFun_smul [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
(hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (h_smul : ∀ c : 𝕜, ∀ s x, T s (c • x) = c • T s x) (c : 𝕜)
(f : α → E) : setToFun μ T hT (c • f) = c • setToFun μ T hT f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· rw [setToFun_eq hT hf, setToFun_eq hT, Integrable.toL1_smul',
L1.setToL1_smul hT h_smul c _]
· by_cases hr : c = 0
· rw [hr]; simp
· have hf' : ¬Integrable (c • f) μ := by rwa [integrable_smul_iff hr f]
rw [setToFun_undef hT hf, setToFun_undef hT hf', smul_zero]
theorem setToFun_congr_ae (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
setToFun μ T hT f = setToFun μ T hT g := by
by_cases hfi : Integrable f μ
· have hgi : Integrable g μ := hfi.congr h
rw [setToFun_eq hT hfi, setToFun_eq hT hgi, (Integrable.toL1_eq_toL1_iff f g hfi hgi).2 h]
· have hgi : ¬Integrable g μ := by rw [integrable_congr h] at hfi; exact hfi
rw [setToFun_undef hT hfi, setToFun_undef hT hgi]
theorem setToFun_measure_zero (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (h : μ = 0) :
setToFun μ T hT f = 0 := by
have : f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by simp [h, EventuallyEq]
rw [setToFun_congr_ae hT this, setToFun_zero]
theorem setToFun_measure_zero' (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C)
(h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → μ s = 0) : setToFun μ T hT f = 0 :=
| setToFun_zero_left' hT fun s hs hμs => hT.eq_zero_of_measure_zero hs (h s hs hμs)
theorem setToFun_toL1 (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) (hf : Integrable f μ) :
setToFun μ T hT (hf.toL1 f) = setToFun μ T hT f :=
setToFun_congr_ae hT hf.coeFn_toL1
theorem setToFun_indicator_const (hT : DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ T C) {s : Set α}
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/SetToL1.lean | 765 | 771 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.ObjectProperty.Shift
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Pretriangulated
/-!
# t-structures on triangulated categories
This files introduces the notion of t-structure on (pre)triangulated categories.
The first example of t-structure shall be the canonical t-structure on the
derived category of an abelian category (TODO).
Given a t-structure `t : TStructure C`, we define type classes `t.IsLE X n`
and `t.IsGE X n` in order to say that an object `X : C` is `≤ n` or `≥ n` for `t`.
## Implementation notes
We introduce the type of t-structures rather than a type class saying that we
have fixed a t-structure on a certain category. The reason is that certain
triangulated categories have several t-structures which one may want to
use depending on the context.
## TODO
* define functors `t.truncLE n : C ⥤ C`,`t.truncGE n : C ⥤ C` and the
associated distinguished triangles
* promote these truncations to a (functorial) spectral object
* define the heart of `t` and show it is an abelian category
* define triangulated subcategories `t.plus`, `t.minus`, `t.bounded` and show
that there are induced t-structures on these full subcategories
## References
* [Beilinson, Bernstein, Deligne, Gabber, *Faisceaux pervers*][bbd-1982]
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
namespace CategoryTheory
open Limits
namespace Triangulated
variable (C : Type _) [Category C] [Preadditive C] [HasZeroObject C] [HasShift C ℤ]
[∀ (n : ℤ), (shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [Pretriangulated C]
open Pretriangulated
/-- `TStructure C` is the type of t-structures on the (pre)triangulated category `C`. -/
structure TStructure where
/-- the predicate of objects that are `≤ n` for `n : ℤ`. -/
le (n : ℤ) : ObjectProperty C
/-- the predicate of objects that are `≥ n` for `n : ℤ`. -/
ge (n : ℤ) : ObjectProperty C
le_isClosedUnderIsomorphisms (n : ℤ) : (le n).IsClosedUnderIsomorphisms := by infer_instance
ge_isClosedUnderIsomorphisms (n : ℤ) : (ge n).IsClosedUnderIsomorphisms := by infer_instance
le_shift (n a n' : ℤ) (h : a + n' = n) (X : C) (hX : le n X) : le n' (X⟦a⟧)
ge_shift (n a n' : ℤ) (h : a + n' = n) (X : C) (hX : ge n X) : ge n' (X⟦a⟧)
zero' ⦃X Y : C⦄ (f : X ⟶ Y) (hX : le 0 X) (hY : ge 1 Y) : f = 0
le_zero_le : le 0 ≤ le 1
ge_one_le : ge 1 ≤ ge 0
exists_triangle_zero_one (A : C) : ∃ (X Y : C) (_ : le 0 X) (_ : ge 1 Y)
(f : X ⟶ A) (g : A ⟶ Y) (h : Y ⟶ X⟦(1 : ℤ)⟧), Triangle.mk f g h ∈ distTriang C
namespace TStructure
attribute [instance] le_isClosedUnderIsomorphisms ge_isClosedUnderIsomorphisms
variable {C}
variable (t : TStructure C)
lemma exists_triangle (A : C) (n₀ n₁ : ℤ) (h : n₀ + 1 = n₁) :
∃ (X Y : C) (_ : t.le n₀ X) (_ : t.ge n₁ Y) (f : X ⟶ A) (g : A ⟶ Y)
(h : Y ⟶ X⟦(1 : ℤ)⟧), Triangle.mk f g h ∈ distTriang C := by
obtain ⟨X, Y, hX, hY, f, g, h, mem⟩ := t.exists_triangle_zero_one (A⟦n₀⟧)
let T := (Triangle.shiftFunctor C (-n₀)).obj (Triangle.mk f g h)
let e := (shiftEquiv C n₀).unitIso.symm.app A
have hT' : Triangle.mk (T.mor₁ ≫ e.hom) (e.inv ≫ T.mor₂) T.mor₃ ∈ distTriang C := by
refine isomorphic_distinguished _ (Triangle.shift_distinguished _ mem (-n₀)) _ ?_
refine Triangle.isoMk _ _ (Iso.refl _) e.symm (Iso.refl _) ?_ ?_ ?_
all_goals dsimp; simp [T]
exact ⟨_, _, t.le_shift _ _ _ (neg_add_cancel n₀) _ hX,
t.ge_shift _ _ _ (by omega) _ hY, _, _, _, hT'⟩
lemma shift_le (a n n' : ℤ) (hn' : a + n = n') :
(t.le n).shift a = t.le n' := by
ext X
constructor
· intro hX
exact ((t.le n').prop_iff_of_iso ((shiftEquiv C a).unitIso.symm.app X)).1
(t.le_shift n (-a) n' (by omega) _ hX)
· intro hX
exact t.le_shift _ _ _ hn' X hX
lemma shift_ge (a n n' : ℤ) (hn' : a + n = n') :
(t.ge n).shift a = t.ge n' := by
ext X
constructor
· intro hX
exact ((t.ge n').prop_iff_of_iso ((shiftEquiv C a).unitIso.symm.app X)).1
(t.ge_shift n (-a) n' (by omega) _ hX)
· intro hX
exact t.ge_shift _ _ _ hn' X hX
lemma le_monotone : Monotone t.le := by
let H := fun (a : ℕ) => ∀ (n : ℤ), t.le n ≤ t.le (n + a)
suffices ∀ (a : ℕ), H a by
intro n₀ n₁ h
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := Int.nonneg_def.1 h
obtain rfl : n₁ = n₀ + a := by omega
apply this
have H_zero : H 0 := fun n => by
simp only [Nat.cast_zero, add_zero]
rfl
have H_one : H 1 := fun n X hX => by
rw [← t.shift_le n 1 (n + (1 : ℕ)) rfl, ObjectProperty.prop_shift_iff]
rw [← t.shift_le n 0 n (add_zero n), ObjectProperty.prop_shift_iff] at hX
exact t.le_zero_le _ hX
have H_add : ∀ (a b c : ℕ) (_ : a + b = c) (_ : H a) (_ : H b), H c := by
intro a b c h ha hb n
rw [← h, Nat.cast_add, ← add_assoc]
exact (ha n).trans (hb (n+a))
intro a
induction' a with a ha
· exact H_zero
| · exact H_add a 1 _ rfl ha H_one
lemma ge_antitone : Antitone t.ge := by
let H := fun (a : ℕ) => ∀ (n : ℤ), t.ge (n + a) ≤ t.ge n
suffices ∀ (a : ℕ), H a by
intro n₀ n₁ h
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := Int.nonneg_def.1 h
obtain rfl : n₁ = n₀ + a := by omega
apply this
have H_zero : H 0 := fun n => by
simp only [Nat.cast_zero, add_zero]
rfl
have H_one : H 1 := fun n X hX => by
rw [← t.shift_ge n 1 (n + (1 : ℕ)) (by simp), ObjectProperty.prop_shift_iff] at hX
rw [← t.shift_ge n 0 n (add_zero n)]
exact t.ge_one_le _ hX
have H_add : ∀ (a b c : ℕ) (_ : a + b = c) (_ : H a) (_ : H b), H c := by
intro a b c h ha hb n
rw [← h, Nat.cast_add, ← add_assoc ]
exact (hb (n + a)).trans (ha n)
intro a
induction' a with a ha
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Triangulated/TStructure/Basic.lean | 131 | 152 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.End
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Pointwise.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Prod
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Map
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.NoZeroSMulDivisors.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Sigma
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Range
import Mathlib.Data.Setoid.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Defs
/-!
# Basic properties of group actions
This file primarily concerns itself with orbits, stabilizers, and other objects defined in terms of
actions. Despite this file being called `basic`, low-level helper lemmas for algebraic manipulation
of `•` belong elsewhere.
## Main definitions
* `MulAction.orbit`
* `MulAction.fixedPoints`
* `MulAction.fixedBy`
* `MulAction.stabilizer`
-/
universe u v
open Pointwise
open Function
namespace MulAction
variable (M : Type u) [Monoid M] (α : Type v) [MulAction M α] {β : Type*} [MulAction M β]
section Orbit
variable {α M}
@[to_additive]
lemma fst_mem_orbit_of_mem_orbit {x y : α × β} (h : x ∈ MulAction.orbit M y) :
x.1 ∈ MulAction.orbit M y.1 := by
rcases h with ⟨g, rfl⟩
exact mem_orbit _ _
@[to_additive]
lemma snd_mem_orbit_of_mem_orbit {x y : α × β} (h : x ∈ MulAction.orbit M y) :
x.2 ∈ MulAction.orbit M y.2 := by
rcases h with ⟨g, rfl⟩
exact mem_orbit _ _
@[to_additive]
lemma _root_.Finite.finite_mulAction_orbit [Finite M] (a : α) : Set.Finite (orbit M a) :=
Set.finite_range _
variable (M)
@[to_additive]
theorem orbit_eq_univ [IsPretransitive M α] (a : α) : orbit M a = Set.univ :=
(surjective_smul M a).range_eq
end Orbit
section FixedPoints
variable {M α}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem subsingleton_orbit_iff_mem_fixedPoints {a : α} :
(orbit M a).Subsingleton ↔ a ∈ fixedPoints M α := by
rw [mem_fixedPoints]
constructor
· exact fun h m ↦ h (mem_orbit a m) (mem_orbit_self a)
· rintro h _ ⟨m, rfl⟩ y ⟨p, rfl⟩
simp only [h]
@[to_additive mem_fixedPoints_iff_card_orbit_eq_one]
theorem mem_fixedPoints_iff_card_orbit_eq_one {a : α} [Fintype (orbit M a)] :
a ∈ fixedPoints M α ↔ Fintype.card (orbit M a) = 1 := by
simp only [← subsingleton_orbit_iff_mem_fixedPoints, le_antisymm_iff,
Fintype.card_le_one_iff_subsingleton, Nat.add_one_le_iff, Fintype.card_pos_iff,
Set.subsingleton_coe, iff_self_and, Set.nonempty_coe_sort, orbit_nonempty, implies_true]
@[to_additive instDecidablePredMemSetFixedByAddOfDecidableEq]
instance (m : M) [DecidableEq β] :
DecidablePred fun b : β => b ∈ MulAction.fixedBy β m := fun b ↦ by
simp only [MulAction.mem_fixedBy, Equiv.Perm.smul_def]
infer_instance
end FixedPoints
end MulAction
/-- `smul` by a `k : M` over a group is injective, if `k` is not a zero divisor.
The general theory of such `k` is elaborated by `IsSMulRegular`.
The typeclass that restricts all terms of `M` to have this property is `NoZeroSMulDivisors`. -/
theorem smul_cancel_of_non_zero_divisor {M G : Type*} [Monoid M] [AddGroup G]
[DistribMulAction M G] (k : M) (h : ∀ x : G, k • x = 0 → x = 0) {a b : G} (h' : k • a = k • b) :
a = b := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
refine h _ ?_
rw [smul_sub, h', sub_self]
namespace MulAction
variable {G α β : Type*} [Group G] [MulAction G α] [MulAction G β]
@[to_additive] theorem fixedPoints_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] :
fixedPoints G α = .univ := by
apply Set.eq_univ_of_forall
simp only [mem_fixedPoints]
intro x hx
apply Subsingleton.elim ..
/-- If a group acts nontrivially, then the type is nontrivial -/
@[to_additive "If a subgroup acts nontrivially, then the type is nontrivial."]
theorem nontrivial_of_fixedPoints_ne_univ (h : fixedPoints G α ≠ .univ) :
Nontrivial α :=
(subsingleton_or_nontrivial α).resolve_left fun _ ↦ h fixedPoints_of_subsingleton
section Orbit
-- TODO: This proof is redoing a special case of `MulAction.IsInvariantBlock.isBlock`. Can we move
-- this lemma earlier to golf?
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_orbit (g : G) (a : α) : g • orbit G a = orbit G a :=
(smul_orbit_subset g a).antisymm <|
calc
orbit G a = g • g⁻¹ • orbit G a := (smul_inv_smul _ _).symm
_ ⊆ g • orbit G a := Set.image_subset _ (smul_orbit_subset _ _)
/-- The action of a group on an orbit is transitive. -/
@[to_additive "The action of an additive group on an orbit is transitive."]
instance (a : α) : IsPretransitive G (orbit G a) :=
⟨by
rintro ⟨_, g, rfl⟩ ⟨_, h, rfl⟩
use h * g⁻¹
ext1
simp [mul_smul]⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma orbitRel_subgroup_le (H : Subgroup G) : orbitRel H α ≤ orbitRel G α :=
Setoid.le_def.2 mem_orbit_of_mem_orbit_subgroup
@[to_additive]
lemma orbitRel_subgroupOf (H K : Subgroup G) :
orbitRel (H.subgroupOf K) α = orbitRel (H ⊓ K : Subgroup G) α := by
rw [← Subgroup.subgroupOf_map_subtype]
ext x
simp_rw [orbitRel_apply]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rcases h with ⟨⟨gv, gp⟩, rfl⟩
simp only [Submonoid.mk_smul]
refine mem_orbit _ (⟨gv, ?_⟩ : Subgroup.map K.subtype (H.subgroupOf K))
simpa using gp
· rcases h with ⟨⟨gv, gp⟩, rfl⟩
simp only [Submonoid.mk_smul]
simp only [Subgroup.subgroupOf_map_subtype, Subgroup.mem_inf] at gp
refine mem_orbit _ (⟨⟨gv, ?_⟩, ?_⟩ : H.subgroupOf K)
· exact gp.2
· simp only [Subgroup.mem_subgroupOf]
exact gp.1
variable (G α)
/-- An action is pretransitive if and only if the quotient by `MulAction.orbitRel` is a
subsingleton. -/
@[to_additive "An additive action is pretransitive if and only if the quotient by
`AddAction.orbitRel` is a subsingleton."]
theorem pretransitive_iff_subsingleton_quotient :
IsPretransitive G α ↔ Subsingleton (orbitRel.Quotient G α) := by
refine ⟨fun _ ↦ ⟨fun a b ↦ ?_⟩, fun _ ↦ ⟨fun a b ↦ ?_⟩⟩
· refine Quot.inductionOn a (fun x ↦ ?_)
exact Quot.inductionOn b (fun y ↦ Quot.sound <| exists_smul_eq G y x)
· have h : Quotient.mk (orbitRel G α) b = ⟦a⟧ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
exact Quotient.eq''.mp h
/-- If `α` is non-empty, an action is pretransitive if and only if the quotient has exactly one
element. -/
@[to_additive "If `α` is non-empty, an additive action is pretransitive if and only if the
quotient has exactly one element."]
theorem pretransitive_iff_unique_quotient_of_nonempty [Nonempty α] :
IsPretransitive G α ↔ Nonempty (Unique <| orbitRel.Quotient G α) := by
rw [unique_iff_subsingleton_and_nonempty, pretransitive_iff_subsingleton_quotient, iff_self_and]
exact fun _ ↦ (nonempty_quotient_iff _).mpr inferInstance
variable {G α}
@[to_additive]
instance (x : orbitRel.Quotient G α) : IsPretransitive G x.orbit where
exists_smul_eq := by
induction x using Quotient.inductionOn'
rintro ⟨y, yh⟩ ⟨z, zh⟩
rw [orbitRel.Quotient.mem_orbit, Quotient.eq''] at yh zh
rcases yh with ⟨g, rfl⟩
rcases zh with ⟨h, rfl⟩
refine ⟨h * g⁻¹, ?_⟩
ext
simp [mul_smul]
variable (G) (α)
local notation "Ω" => orbitRel.Quotient G α
@[to_additive]
lemma _root_.Finite.of_finite_mulAction_orbitRel_quotient [Finite G] [Finite Ω] : Finite α := by
rw [(selfEquivSigmaOrbits' G _).finite_iff]
have : ∀ g : Ω, Finite g.orbit := by
intro g
induction g using Quotient.inductionOn'
simpa [Set.finite_coe_iff] using Finite.finite_mulAction_orbit _
exact Finite.instSigma
variable (β)
@[to_additive]
lemma orbitRel_le_fst :
orbitRel G (α × β) ≤ (orbitRel G α).comap Prod.fst :=
Setoid.le_def.2 fst_mem_orbit_of_mem_orbit
@[to_additive]
lemma orbitRel_le_snd :
orbitRel G (α × β) ≤ (orbitRel G β).comap Prod.snd :=
Setoid.le_def.2 snd_mem_orbit_of_mem_orbit
end Orbit
section Stabilizer
variable (G)
variable {G}
/-- If the stabilizer of `a` is `S`, then the stabilizer of `g • a` is `gSg⁻¹`. -/
theorem stabilizer_smul_eq_stabilizer_map_conj (g : G) (a : α) :
stabilizer G (g • a) = (stabilizer G a).map (MulAut.conj g).toMonoidHom := by
ext h
rw [mem_stabilizer_iff, ← smul_left_cancel_iff g⁻¹, smul_smul, smul_smul, smul_smul,
inv_mul_cancel, one_smul, ← mem_stabilizer_iff, Subgroup.mem_map_equiv, MulAut.conj_symm_apply]
/-- A bijection between the stabilizers of two elements in the same orbit. -/
noncomputable def stabilizerEquivStabilizerOfOrbitRel {a b : α} (h : orbitRel G α a b) :
stabilizer G a ≃* stabilizer G b :=
let g : G := Classical.choose h
have hg : g • b = a := Classical.choose_spec h
have this : stabilizer G a = (stabilizer G b).map (MulAut.conj g).toMonoidHom := by
rw [← hg, stabilizer_smul_eq_stabilizer_map_conj]
(MulEquiv.subgroupCongr this).trans ((MulAut.conj g).subgroupMap <| stabilizer G b).symm
end Stabilizer
end MulAction
namespace AddAction
variable {G α : Type*} [AddGroup G] [AddAction G α]
/-- If the stabilizer of `x` is `S`, then the stabilizer of `g +ᵥ x` is `g + S + (-g)`. -/
theorem stabilizer_vadd_eq_stabilizer_map_conj (g : G) (a : α) :
stabilizer G (g +ᵥ a) = (stabilizer G a).map (AddAut.conj g).toMul.toAddMonoidHom := by
ext h
rw [mem_stabilizer_iff, ← vadd_left_cancel_iff (-g), vadd_vadd, vadd_vadd, vadd_vadd,
neg_add_cancel, zero_vadd, ← mem_stabilizer_iff, AddSubgroup.mem_map_equiv,
AddAut.conj_symm_apply]
/-- A bijection between the stabilizers of two elements in the same orbit. -/
noncomputable def stabilizerEquivStabilizerOfOrbitRel {a b : α} (h : orbitRel G α a b) :
stabilizer G a ≃+ stabilizer G b :=
let g : G := Classical.choose h
have hg : g +ᵥ b = a := Classical.choose_spec h
have this : stabilizer G a = (stabilizer G b).map (AddAut.conj g).toMul.toAddMonoidHom := by
rw [← hg, stabilizer_vadd_eq_stabilizer_map_conj]
(AddEquiv.addSubgroupCongr this).trans ((AddAut.conj g).addSubgroupMap <| stabilizer G b).symm
end AddAction
attribute [to_additive existing] MulAction.stabilizer_smul_eq_stabilizer_map_conj
attribute [to_additive existing] MulAction.stabilizerEquivStabilizerOfOrbitRel
theorem Equiv.swap_mem_stabilizer {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] {S : Set α} {a b : α} :
Equiv.swap a b ∈ MulAction.stabilizer (Equiv.Perm α) S ↔ (a ∈ S ↔ b ∈ S) := by
rw [MulAction.mem_stabilizer_iff, Set.ext_iff, ← swap_inv]
simp_rw [Set.mem_inv_smul_set_iff, Perm.smul_def, swap_apply_def]
exact ⟨fun h ↦ by simpa [Iff.comm] using h a, by intros; split_ifs <;> simp [*]⟩
namespace MulAction
variable {G : Type*} [Group G] {α : Type*} [MulAction G α]
/-- To prove inclusion of a *subgroup* in a stabilizer, it is enough to prove inclusions. -/
@[to_additive
"To prove inclusion of a *subgroup* in a stabilizer, it is enough to prove inclusions."]
theorem le_stabilizer_iff_smul_le (s : Set α) (H : Subgroup G) :
H ≤ stabilizer G s ↔ ∀ g ∈ H, g • s ⊆ s := by
constructor
· intro hyp g hg
apply Eq.subset
rw [← mem_stabilizer_iff]
exact hyp hg
· intro hyp g hg
rw [mem_stabilizer_iff]
apply subset_antisymm (hyp g hg)
intro x hx
use g⁻¹ • x
constructor
· apply hyp g⁻¹ (inv_mem hg)
simp only [Set.smul_mem_smul_set_iff, hx]
· simp only [smul_inv_smul]
end MulAction
section
variable (R M : Type*) [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M]
variable {M} in
lemma Module.stabilizer_units_eq_bot_of_ne_zero {x : M} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
MulAction.stabilizer Rˣ x = ⊥ := by
rw [eq_bot_iff]
intro g (hg : g.val • x = x)
ext
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← smul_eq_zero_iff_left hx, Units.val_one, sub_smul, hg, one_smul, sub_self]
end
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/GroupAction/Basic.lean | 464 | 477 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Stuart Presnell. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Stuart Presnell
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PrimeFin
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
/-!
# Basic lemmas on prime factorizations
-/
open Finset List Finsupp
namespace Nat
variable {a b m n p : ℕ}
/-! ### Basic facts about factorization -/
/-! ## Lemmas characterising when `n.factorization p = 0` -/
theorem factorization_eq_zero_of_lt {n p : ℕ} (h : n < p) : n.factorization p = 0 :=
Finsupp.not_mem_support_iff.mp (mt le_of_mem_primeFactors (not_le_of_lt h))
@[simp]
theorem factorization_one_right (n : ℕ) : n.factorization 1 = 0 :=
factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime _ not_prime_one
theorem dvd_of_factorization_pos {n p : ℕ} (hn : n.factorization p ≠ 0) : p ∣ n :=
dvd_of_mem_primeFactorsList <| mem_primeFactors_iff_mem_primeFactorsList.1 <| mem_support_iff.2 hn
theorem factorization_eq_zero_iff_remainder {p r : ℕ} (i : ℕ) (pp : p.Prime) (hr0 : r ≠ 0) :
¬p ∣ r ↔ (p * i + r).factorization p = 0 := by
refine ⟨factorization_eq_zero_of_remainder i, fun h => ?_⟩
rw [factorization_eq_zero_iff] at h
contrapose! h
refine ⟨pp, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [← Nat.dvd_add_iff_right (dvd_mul_right p i)]
· contrapose! hr0
exact (add_eq_zero.1 hr0).2
/-- The only numbers with empty prime factorization are `0` and `1` -/
theorem factorization_eq_zero_iff' (n : ℕ) : n.factorization = 0 ↔ n = 0 ∨ n = 1 := by
rw [factorization_eq_primeFactorsList_multiset n]
simp [factorization, AddEquiv.map_eq_zero_iff, Multiset.coe_eq_zero]
/-! ## Lemmas about factorizations of products and powers -/
/-- A product over `n.factorization` can be written as a product over `n.primeFactors`; -/
lemma prod_factorization_eq_prod_primeFactors {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (f : ℕ → ℕ → β) :
n.factorization.prod f = ∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, f p (n.factorization p) := rfl
/-- A product over `n.primeFactors` can be written as a product over `n.factorization`; -/
lemma prod_primeFactors_prod_factorization {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (f : ℕ → β) :
∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, f p = n.factorization.prod (fun p _ ↦ f p) := rfl
/-! ## Lemmas about factorizations of primes and prime powers -/
/-- The multiplicity of prime `p` in `p` is `1` -/
@[simp]
theorem Prime.factorization_self {p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) : p.factorization p = 1 := by simp [hp]
/-- If the factorization of `n` contains just one number `p` then `n` is a power of `p` -/
theorem eq_pow_of_factorization_eq_single {n p k : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0)
(h : n.factorization = Finsupp.single p k) : n = p ^ k := by
rw [← Nat.factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hn, h]
simp
/-- The only prime factor of prime `p` is `p` itself. -/
theorem Prime.eq_of_factorization_pos {p q : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) (h : p.factorization q ≠ 0) :
p = q := by simpa [hp.factorization, single_apply] using h
/-! ### Equivalence between `ℕ+` and `ℕ →₀ ℕ` with support in the primes. -/
theorem eq_factorization_iff {n : ℕ} {f : ℕ →₀ ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hf : ∀ p ∈ f.support, Prime p) :
f = n.factorization ↔ f.prod (· ^ ·) = n :=
⟨fun h => by rw [h, factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hn], fun h => by
rw [← h, prod_pow_factorization_eq_self hf]⟩
theorem factorizationEquiv_inv_apply {f : ℕ →₀ ℕ} (hf : ∀ p ∈ f.support, Prime p) :
(factorizationEquiv.symm ⟨f, hf⟩).1 = f.prod (· ^ ·) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ordProj_of_not_prime (n p : ℕ) (hp : ¬p.Prime) : ordProj[p] n = 1 := by
simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n hp]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_proj_of_not_prime := ordProj_of_not_prime
@[simp]
theorem ordCompl_of_not_prime (n p : ℕ) (hp : ¬p.Prime) : ordCompl[p] n = n := by
simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n hp]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_of_not_prime := ordCompl_of_not_prime
theorem ordCompl_dvd (n p : ℕ) : ordCompl[p] n ∣ n :=
div_dvd_of_dvd (ordProj_dvd n p)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_dvd := ordCompl_dvd
theorem ordProj_pos (n p : ℕ) : 0 < ordProj[p] n := by
if pp : p.Prime then simp [pow_pos pp.pos] else simp [pp]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_proj_pos := ordProj_pos
theorem ordProj_le {n : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : ordProj[p] n ≤ n :=
le_of_dvd hn.bot_lt (Nat.ordProj_dvd n p)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_proj_le := ordProj_le
theorem ordCompl_pos {n : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : 0 < ordCompl[p] n := by
if pp : p.Prime then
exact Nat.div_pos (ordProj_le p hn) (ordProj_pos n p)
else
simpa [Nat.factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n pp] using hn.bot_lt
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_pos := ordCompl_pos
theorem ordCompl_le (n p : ℕ) : ordCompl[p] n ≤ n :=
Nat.div_le_self _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_le := ordCompl_le
theorem ordProj_mul_ordCompl_eq_self (n p : ℕ) : ordProj[p] n * ordCompl[p] n = n :=
Nat.mul_div_cancel' (ordProj_dvd n p)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias ord_proj_mul_ord_compl_eq_self := ordProj_mul_ordCompl_eq_self
theorem ordProj_mul {a b : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
ordProj[p] (a * b) = ordProj[p] a * ordProj[p] b := by
simp [factorization_mul ha hb, pow_add]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_proj_mul := ordProj_mul
theorem ordCompl_mul (a b p : ℕ) : ordCompl[p] (a * b) = ordCompl[p] a * ordCompl[p] b := by
if ha : a = 0 then simp [ha] else
if hb : b = 0 then simp [hb] else
simp only [ordProj_mul p ha hb]
rw [div_mul_div_comm (ordProj_dvd a p) (ordProj_dvd b p)]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_mul := ordCompl_mul
/-! ### Factorization and divisibility -/
/-- A crude upper bound on `n.factorization p` -/
theorem factorization_lt {n : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : n.factorization p < n := by
by_cases pp : p.Prime
· exact (Nat.pow_lt_pow_iff_right pp.one_lt).1 <| (ordProj_le p hn).trans_lt <|
Nat.lt_pow_self pp.one_lt
· simpa only [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n pp] using hn.bot_lt
/-- An upper bound on `n.factorization p` -/
theorem factorization_le_of_le_pow {n p b : ℕ} (hb : n ≤ p ^ b) : n.factorization p ≤ b := by
if hn : n = 0 then simp [hn] else
if pp : p.Prime then
exact (Nat.pow_le_pow_iff_right pp.one_lt).1 ((ordProj_le p hn).trans hb)
else
simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n pp]
theorem factorization_prime_le_iff_dvd {d n : ℕ} (hd : d ≠ 0) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → d.factorization p ≤ n.factorization p) ↔ d ∣ n := by
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd hd hn]
refine ⟨fun h p => (em p.Prime).elim (h p) fun hp => ?_, fun h p _ => h p⟩
simp_rw [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime _ hp]
rfl
theorem factorization_le_factorization_mul_left {a b : ℕ} (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a.factorization ≤ (a * b).factorization := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha)
· simp
rw [factorization_le_iff_dvd ha <| mul_ne_zero ha hb]
exact Dvd.intro b rfl
theorem factorization_le_factorization_mul_right {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
b.factorization ≤ (a * b).factorization := by
rw [mul_comm]
apply factorization_le_factorization_mul_left ha
theorem Prime.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization {p k n : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
p ^ k ∣ n ↔ k ≤ n.factorization p := by
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd (pow_pos pp.pos k).ne' hn, pp.factorization_pow, single_le_iff]
theorem Prime.pow_dvd_iff_dvd_ordProj {p k n : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
p ^ k ∣ n ↔ p ^ k ∣ ordProj[p] n := by
rw [pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right pp.one_lt, pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias Prime.pow_dvd_iff_dvd_ord_proj := Prime.pow_dvd_iff_dvd_ordProj
theorem Prime.dvd_iff_one_le_factorization {p n : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
p ∣ n ↔ 1 ≤ n.factorization p :=
Iff.trans (by simp) (pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn)
theorem exists_factorization_lt_of_lt {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hab : a < b) :
∃ p : ℕ, a.factorization p < b.factorization p := by
have hb : b ≠ 0 := (ha.bot_lt.trans hab).ne'
contrapose! hab
rw [← Finsupp.le_def, factorization_le_iff_dvd hb ha] at hab
exact le_of_dvd ha.bot_lt hab
@[simp]
theorem factorization_div {d n : ℕ} (h : d ∣ n) :
(n / d).factorization = n.factorization - d.factorization := by
rcases eq_or_ne d 0 with (rfl | hd); · simp [zero_dvd_iff.mp h]
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn); · simp [tsub_eq_zero_of_le]
apply add_left_injective d.factorization
simp only
rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le <| (Nat.factorization_le_iff_dvd hd hn).mpr h, ←
Nat.factorization_mul (Nat.div_pos (Nat.le_of_dvd hn.bot_lt h) hd.bot_lt).ne' hd,
Nat.div_mul_cancel h]
theorem dvd_ordProj_of_dvd {n p : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (pp : p.Prime) (h : p ∣ n) : p ∣ ordProj[p] n :=
dvd_pow_self p (Prime.factorization_pos_of_dvd pp hn h).ne'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias dvd_ord_proj_of_dvd := dvd_ordProj_of_dvd
theorem not_dvd_ordCompl {n p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) : ¬p ∣ ordCompl[p] n := by
rw [Nat.Prime.dvd_iff_one_le_factorization hp (ordCompl_pos p hn).ne']
rw [Nat.factorization_div (Nat.ordProj_dvd n p)]
simp [hp.factorization]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias not_dvd_ord_compl := not_dvd_ordCompl
theorem coprime_ordCompl {n p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) : Coprime p (ordCompl[p] n) :=
(or_iff_left (not_dvd_ordCompl hp hn)).mp <| coprime_or_dvd_of_prime hp _
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias coprime_ord_compl := coprime_ordCompl
theorem factorization_ordCompl (n p : ℕ) :
(ordCompl[p] n).factorization = n.factorization.erase p := by
if hn : n = 0 then simp [hn] else
if pp : p.Prime then ?_ else
simp [pp]
ext q
rcases eq_or_ne q p with (rfl | hqp)
· simp only [Finsupp.erase_same, factorization_eq_zero_iff, not_dvd_ordCompl pp hn]
simp
· rw [Finsupp.erase_ne hqp, factorization_div (ordProj_dvd n p)]
simp [pp.factorization, hqp.symm]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias factorization_ord_compl := factorization_ordCompl
-- `ordCompl[p] n` is the largest divisor of `n` not divisible by `p`.
theorem dvd_ordCompl_of_dvd_not_dvd {p d n : ℕ} (hdn : d ∣ n) (hpd : ¬p ∣ d) :
d ∣ ordCompl[p] n := by
if hn0 : n = 0 then simp [hn0] else
if hd0 : d = 0 then simp [hd0] at hpd else
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd hd0 (ordCompl_pos p hn0).ne', factorization_ordCompl]
intro q
if hqp : q = p then
simp [factorization_eq_zero_iff, hqp, hpd]
else
simp [hqp, (factorization_le_iff_dvd hd0 hn0).2 hdn q]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias dvd_ord_compl_of_dvd_not_dvd := dvd_ordCompl_of_dvd_not_dvd
/-- If `n` is a nonzero natural number and `p ≠ 1`, then there are natural numbers `e`
and `n'` such that `n'` is not divisible by `p` and `n = p^e * n'`. -/
theorem exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (p : ℕ) (hp : p ≠ 1) :
∃ e n' : ℕ, ¬p ∣ n' ∧ n = p ^ e * n' :=
let ⟨a', h₁, h₂⟩ :=
(Nat.finiteMultiplicity_iff.mpr ⟨hp, Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn⟩).exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd
⟨_, a', h₂, h₁⟩
/-- Any nonzero natural number is the product of an odd part `m` and a power of
two `2 ^ k`. -/
theorem exists_eq_two_pow_mul_odd {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
∃ k m : ℕ, Odd m ∧ n = 2 ^ k * m :=
let ⟨k, m, hm, hn⟩ := exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd hn 2 (succ_ne_self 1)
⟨k, m, not_even_iff_odd.1 (mt Even.two_dvd hm), hn⟩
theorem dvd_iff_div_factorization_eq_tsub {d n : ℕ} (hd : d ≠ 0) (hdn : d ≤ n) :
d ∣ n ↔ (n / d).factorization = n.factorization - d.factorization := by
refine ⟨factorization_div, ?_⟩
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hdn with (rfl | hd_lt_n); · simp
have h1 : n / d ≠ 0 := by simp [*]
intro h
rw [dvd_iff_le_div_mul n d]
by_contra h2
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := exists_factorization_lt_of_lt (mul_ne_zero h1 hd) (not_le.mp h2)
rwa [factorization_mul h1 hd, add_apply, ← lt_tsub_iff_right, h, tsub_apply,
lt_self_iff_false] at hp
theorem ordProj_dvd_ordProj_of_dvd {a b : ℕ} (hb0 : b ≠ 0) (hab : a ∣ b) (p : ℕ) :
ordProj[p] a ∣ ordProj[p] b := by
rcases em' p.Prime with (pp | pp); · simp [pp]
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha0); · simp
rw [pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right pp.one_lt]
exact (factorization_le_iff_dvd ha0 hb0).2 hab p
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias ord_proj_dvd_ord_proj_of_dvd := ordProj_dvd_ordProj_of_dvd
theorem ordProj_dvd_ordProj_iff_dvd {a b : ℕ} (ha0 : a ≠ 0) (hb0 : b ≠ 0) :
(∀ p : ℕ, ordProj[p] a ∣ ordProj[p] b) ↔ a ∣ b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun hab p => ordProj_dvd_ordProj_of_dvd hb0 hab p⟩
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd ha0 hb0]
intro q
rcases le_or_lt q 1 with (hq_le | hq1)
· interval_cases q <;> simp
exact (pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right hq1).1 (h q)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias ord_proj_dvd_ord_proj_iff_dvd := ordProj_dvd_ordProj_iff_dvd
theorem ordCompl_dvd_ordCompl_of_dvd {a b : ℕ} (hab : a ∣ b) (p : ℕ) :
ordCompl[p] a ∣ ordCompl[p] b := by
rcases em' p.Prime with (pp | pp)
· simp [pp, hab]
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb0)
· simp
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha0)
· cases hb0 (zero_dvd_iff.1 hab)
have ha := (Nat.div_pos (ordProj_le p ha0) (ordProj_pos a p)).ne'
have hb := (Nat.div_pos (ordProj_le p hb0) (ordProj_pos b p)).ne'
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd ha hb, factorization_ordCompl a p, factorization_ordCompl b p]
intro q
rcases eq_or_ne q p with (rfl | hqp)
· simp
simp_rw [erase_ne hqp]
exact (factorization_le_iff_dvd ha0 hb0).2 hab q
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias ord_compl_dvd_ord_compl_of_dvd := ordCompl_dvd_ordCompl_of_dvd
theorem ordCompl_dvd_ordCompl_iff_dvd (a b : ℕ) :
(∀ p : ℕ, ordCompl[p] a ∣ ordCompl[p] b) ↔ a ∣ b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun hab p => ordCompl_dvd_ordCompl_of_dvd hab p⟩
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb0)
· simp
if pa : a.Prime then ?_ else simpa [pa] using h a
if pb : b.Prime then ?_ else simpa [pb] using h b
rw [prime_dvd_prime_iff_eq pa pb]
by_contra hab
apply pa.ne_one
rw [← Nat.dvd_one, ← Nat.mul_dvd_mul_iff_left hb0.bot_lt, mul_one]
simpa [Prime.factorization_self pb, Prime.factorization pa, hab] using h b
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias ord_compl_dvd_ord_compl_iff_dvd := ordCompl_dvd_ordCompl_iff_dvd
theorem dvd_iff_prime_pow_dvd_dvd (n d : ℕ) :
d ∣ n ↔ ∀ p k : ℕ, Prime p → p ^ k ∣ d → p ^ k ∣ n := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
rcases eq_or_ne d 0 with (rfl | hd)
· simp only [zero_dvd_iff, hn, false_iff, not_forall]
exact ⟨2, n, prime_two, dvd_zero _, mt (le_of_dvd hn.bot_lt) (n.lt_two_pow_self).not_le⟩
refine ⟨fun h p k _ hpkd => dvd_trans hpkd h, ?_⟩
rw [← factorization_prime_le_iff_dvd hd hn]
intro h p pp
simp_rw [← pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn]
exact h p _ pp (ordProj_dvd _ _)
theorem prod_primeFactors_dvd (n : ℕ) : ∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, p ∣ n := by
by_cases hn : n = 0
· subst hn
simp
· simpa [prod_primeFactorsList hn] using (n.primeFactorsList : Multiset ℕ).toFinset_prod_dvd_prod
theorem factorization_gcd {a b : ℕ} (ha_pos : a ≠ 0) (hb_pos : b ≠ 0) :
(gcd a b).factorization = a.factorization ⊓ b.factorization := by
let dfac := a.factorization ⊓ b.factorization
let d := dfac.prod (· ^ ·)
have dfac_prime : ∀ p : ℕ, p ∈ dfac.support → Prime p := by
intro p hp
have : p ∈ a.primeFactorsList ∧ p ∈ b.primeFactorsList := by simpa [dfac] using hp
exact prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList this.1
have h1 : d.factorization = dfac := prod_pow_factorization_eq_self dfac_prime
have hd_pos : d ≠ 0 := (factorizationEquiv.invFun ⟨dfac, dfac_prime⟩).2.ne'
suffices d = gcd a b by rwa [← this]
apply gcd_greatest
· rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd hd_pos ha_pos, h1]
exact inf_le_left
· rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd hd_pos hb_pos, h1]
exact inf_le_right
· intro e hea heb
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne e 0 with (rfl | he_pos)
· simp only [zero_dvd_iff] at hea
contradiction
have hea' := (factorization_le_iff_dvd he_pos ha_pos).mpr hea
have heb' := (factorization_le_iff_dvd he_pos hb_pos).mpr heb
simp [dfac, ← factorization_le_iff_dvd he_pos hd_pos, h1, hea', heb']
theorem factorization_lcm {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
(a.lcm b).factorization = a.factorization ⊔ b.factorization := by
rw [← add_right_inj (a.gcd b).factorization, ←
factorization_mul (mt gcd_eq_zero_iff.1 fun h => ha h.1) (lcm_ne_zero ha hb), gcd_mul_lcm,
factorization_gcd ha hb, factorization_mul ha hb]
ext1
exact (min_add_max _ _).symm
variable (a b)
@[simp]
lemma factorizationLCMLeft_zero_left : factorizationLCMLeft 0 b = 1 := by
simp [factorizationLCMLeft]
@[simp]
lemma factorizationLCMLeft_zero_right : factorizationLCMLeft a 0 = 1 := by
simp [factorizationLCMLeft]
@[simp]
lemma factorizationLCRight_zero_left : factorizationLCMRight 0 b = 1 := by
simp [factorizationLCMRight]
@[simp]
lemma factorizationLCMRight_zero_right : factorizationLCMRight a 0 = 1 := by
simp [factorizationLCMRight]
lemma factorizationLCMLeft_pos :
0 < factorizationLCMLeft a b := by
apply Nat.pos_of_ne_zero
rw [factorizationLCMLeft, Finsupp.prod_ne_zero_iff]
intro p _ H
by_cases h : b.factorization p ≤ a.factorization p
· simp only [h, reduceIte, pow_eq_zero_iff', ne_eq] at H
simpa [H.1] using H.2
· simp only [h, reduceIte, one_ne_zero] at H
lemma factorizationLCMRight_pos :
0 < factorizationLCMRight a b := by
apply Nat.pos_of_ne_zero
rw [factorizationLCMRight, Finsupp.prod_ne_zero_iff]
intro p _ H
by_cases h : b.factorization p ≤ a.factorization p
· simp only [h, reduceIte, pow_eq_zero_iff', ne_eq, reduceCtorEq] at H
· simp only [h, ↓reduceIte, pow_eq_zero_iff', ne_eq] at H
simpa [H.1] using H.2
lemma coprime_factorizationLCMLeft_factorizationLCMRight :
(factorizationLCMLeft a b).Coprime (factorizationLCMRight a b) := by
rw [factorizationLCMLeft, factorizationLCMRight]
refine coprime_prod_left_iff.mpr fun p hp ↦ coprime_prod_right_iff.mpr fun q hq ↦ ?_
dsimp only; split_ifs with h h'
any_goals simp only [coprime_one_right_eq_true, coprime_one_left_eq_true]
refine coprime_pow_primes _ _ (prime_of_mem_primeFactors hp) (prime_of_mem_primeFactors hq) ?_
contrapose! h'; rwa [← h']
variable {a b}
lemma factorizationLCMLeft_mul_factorizationLCMRight (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
(factorizationLCMLeft a b) * (factorizationLCMRight a b) = lcm a b := by
rw [← factorization_prod_pow_eq_self (lcm_ne_zero ha hb), factorizationLCMLeft,
factorizationLCMRight, ← prod_mul]
congr; ext p n; split_ifs <;> simp
variable (a b)
lemma factorizationLCMLeft_dvd_left : factorizationLCMLeft a b ∣ a := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with rfl | ha
· simp only [dvd_zero]
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with rfl | hb
· simp [factorizationLCMLeft]
nth_rewrite 2 [← factorization_prod_pow_eq_self ha]
rw [prod_of_support_subset (s := (lcm a b).factorization.support)]
· apply prod_dvd_prod_of_dvd; rintro p -; dsimp only; split_ifs with le
· rw [factorization_lcm ha hb]; apply pow_dvd_pow; exact sup_le le_rfl le
· apply one_dvd
· intro p hp; rw [mem_support_iff] at hp ⊢
rw [factorization_lcm ha hb]; exact (lt_sup_iff.mpr <| .inl <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hp).ne'
· intros; rw [pow_zero]
lemma factorizationLCMRight_dvd_right : factorizationLCMRight a b ∣ b := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with rfl | ha
· simp [factorizationLCMRight]
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with rfl | hb
· simp only [dvd_zero]
nth_rewrite 2 [← factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hb]
rw [prod_of_support_subset (s := (lcm a b).factorization.support)]
· apply Finset.prod_dvd_prod_of_dvd; rintro p -; dsimp only; split_ifs with le
· apply one_dvd
· rw [factorization_lcm ha hb]; apply pow_dvd_pow; exact sup_le (not_le.1 le).le le_rfl
· intro p hp; rw [mem_support_iff] at hp ⊢
rw [factorization_lcm ha hb]; exact (lt_sup_iff.mpr <| .inr <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hp).ne'
· intros; rw [pow_zero]
@[to_additive sum_primeFactors_gcd_add_sum_primeFactors_mul]
theorem prod_primeFactors_gcd_mul_prod_primeFactors_mul {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (m n : ℕ)
(f : ℕ → β) :
(m.gcd n).primeFactors.prod f * (m * n).primeFactors.prod f =
m.primeFactors.prod f * n.primeFactors.prod f := by
obtain rfl | hm₀ := eq_or_ne m 0
· simp
obtain rfl | hn₀ := eq_or_ne n 0
· simp
· rw [primeFactors_mul hm₀ hn₀, primeFactors_gcd hm₀ hn₀, mul_comm, Finset.prod_union_inter]
theorem setOf_pow_dvd_eq_Icc_factorization {n p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
{ i : ℕ | i ≠ 0 ∧ p ^ i ∣ n } = Set.Icc 1 (n.factorization p) := by
ext
simp [Nat.lt_succ_iff, one_le_iff_ne_zero, pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn]
/-- The set of positive powers of prime `p` that divide `n` is exactly the set of
positive natural numbers up to `n.factorization p`. -/
theorem Icc_factorization_eq_pow_dvd (n : ℕ) {p : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) :
Icc 1 (n.factorization p) = {i ∈ Ico 1 n | p ^ i ∣ n} := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
ext x
simp only [mem_Icc, Finset.mem_filter, mem_Ico, and_assoc, and_congr_right_iff,
pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn, iff_and_self]
exact fun _ H => lt_of_le_of_lt H (factorization_lt p hn)
theorem factorization_eq_card_pow_dvd (n : ℕ) {p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) :
n.factorization p = #{i ∈ Ico 1 n | p ^ i ∣ n} := by
simp [← Icc_factorization_eq_pow_dvd n pp]
theorem Ico_filter_pow_dvd_eq {n p b : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (hn : n ≠ 0) (hb : n ≤ p ^ b) :
{i ∈ Ico 1 n | p ^ i ∣ n} = {i ∈ Icc 1 b | p ^ i ∣ n} := by
ext x
simp only [Finset.mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Icc, and_congr_left_iff, and_congr_right_iff]
rintro h1 -
exact iff_of_true (lt_of_pow_dvd_right hn pp.two_le h1) <|
(Nat.pow_le_pow_iff_right pp.one_lt).1 <| (le_of_dvd hn.bot_lt h1).trans hb
/-! ### Factorization and coprimes -/
/-- If `p` is a prime factor of `a` then the power of `p` in `a` is the same that in `a * b`,
for any `b` coprime to `a`. -/
theorem factorization_eq_of_coprime_left {p a b : ℕ} (hab : Coprime a b)
(hpa : p ∈ a.primeFactorsList) : (a * b).factorization p = a.factorization p := by
rw [factorization_mul_apply_of_coprime hab, ← primeFactorsList_count_eq,
← primeFactorsList_count_eq,
count_eq_zero_of_not_mem (coprime_primeFactorsList_disjoint hab hpa), add_zero]
/-- If `p` is a prime factor of `b` then the power of `p` in `b` is the same that in `a * b`,
for any `a` coprime to `b`. -/
theorem factorization_eq_of_coprime_right {p a b : ℕ} (hab : Coprime a b)
(hpb : p ∈ b.primeFactorsList) : (a * b).factorization p = b.factorization p := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact factorization_eq_of_coprime_left (coprime_comm.mp hab) hpb
/-- Two positive naturals are equal if their prime padic valuations are equal -/
theorem eq_iff_prime_padicValNat_eq (a b : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a = b ↔ ∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → padicValNat p a = padicValNat p b := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
simp
· intro h
refine eq_of_factorization_eq ha hb fun p => ?_
by_cases pp : p.Prime
· simp [factorization_def, pp, h p pp]
· simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime, pp]
theorem prod_pow_prime_padicValNat (n : Nat) (hn : n ≠ 0) (m : Nat) (pr : n < m) :
∏ p ∈ range m with p.Prime, p ^ padicValNat p n = n := by
nth_rw 2 [← factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hn]
rw [eq_comm]
apply Finset.prod_subset_one_on_sdiff
· exact fun p hp => Finset.mem_filter.mpr ⟨Finset.mem_range.2 <| pr.trans_le' <|
le_of_mem_primeFactors hp, prime_of_mem_primeFactors hp⟩
· intro p hp
obtain ⟨hp1, hp2⟩ := Finset.mem_sdiff.mp hp
rw [← factorization_def n (Finset.mem_filter.mp hp1).2]
simp [Finsupp.not_mem_support_iff.mp hp2]
· intro p hp
simp [factorization_def n (prime_of_mem_primeFactors hp)]
/-! ### Lemmas about factorizations of particular functions -/
-- TODO: Port lemmas from `Data/Nat/Multiplicity` to here, re-written in terms of `factorization`
/-- Exactly `n / p` naturals in `[1, n]` are multiples of `p`.
See `Nat.card_multiples'` for an alternative spelling of the statement. -/
theorem card_multiples (n p : ℕ) : #{e ∈ range n | p ∣ e + 1} = n / p := by
induction' n with n hn
· simp
simp [Nat.succ_div, add_ite, add_zero, Finset.range_succ, filter_insert, apply_ite card,
card_insert_of_not_mem, hn]
/-- Exactly `n / p` naturals in `(0, n]` are multiples of `p`. -/
theorem Ioc_filter_dvd_card_eq_div (n p : ℕ) : #{x ∈ Ioc 0 n | p ∣ x} = n / p := by
induction' n with n IH
· simp
-- TODO: Golf away `h1` after Yaël PRs a lemma asserting this
have h1 : Ioc 0 n.succ = insert n.succ (Ioc 0 n) := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hn)
· simp
simp_rw [← Ico_succ_succ, Ico_insert_right (succ_le_succ hn.le), Ico_succ_right]
simp [Nat.succ_div, add_ite, add_zero, h1, filter_insert, apply_ite card, card_insert_eq_ite, IH,
Finset.mem_filter, mem_Ioc, not_le.2 (lt_add_one n)]
/-- There are exactly `⌊N/n⌋` positive multiples of `n` that are `≤ N`.
See `Nat.card_multiples` for a "shifted-by-one" version. -/
lemma card_multiples' (N n : ℕ) : #{k ∈ range N.succ | k ≠ 0 ∧ n ∣ k} = N / n := by
induction N with
| zero => simp [Finset.filter_false_of_mem]
| succ N ih =>
rw [Finset.range_succ, Finset.filter_insert]
by_cases h : n ∣ N.succ
· simp [h, succ_div_of_dvd, ih]
· simp [h, succ_div_of_not_dvd, ih]
end Nat
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Factorization/Basic.lean | 797 | 799 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Chris Birkbeck. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Birkbeck
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.UpperHalfPlane.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.GeneralLinearGroup.Defs
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.SpecialLinearGroup
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
/-!
# Slash actions
This file defines a class of slash actions, which are families of right actions of a given group
parametrized by some Type. This is modeled on the slash action of `GLPos (Fin 2) ℝ` on the space
of modular forms.
## Notation
In the `ModularForm` locale, this provides
* `f ∣[k;γ] A`: the `k`th `γ`-compatible slash action by `A` on `f`
* `f ∣[k] A`: the `k`th `ℂ`-compatible slash action by `A` on `f`; a shorthand for `f ∣[k;ℂ] A`
-/
open Complex UpperHalfPlane ModularGroup
open scoped MatrixGroups
/-- A general version of the slash action of the space of modular forms. -/
class SlashAction (β G α γ : Type*) [Group G] [AddMonoid α] [SMul γ α] where
map : β → G → α → α
zero_slash : ∀ (k : β) (g : G), map k g 0 = 0
slash_one : ∀ (k : β) (a : α), map k 1 a = a
slash_mul : ∀ (k : β) (g h : G) (a : α), map k (g * h) a = map k h (map k g a)
smul_slash : ∀ (k : β) (g : G) (a : α) (z : γ), map k g (z • a) = z • map k g a
add_slash : ∀ (k : β) (g : G) (a b : α), map k g (a + b) = map k g a + map k g b
scoped[ModularForm] notation:100 f " ∣[" k ";" γ "] " a:100 => SlashAction.map γ k a f
scoped[ModularForm] notation:100 f " ∣[" k "] " a:100 => SlashAction.map ℂ k a f
open scoped ModularForm
@[simp]
theorem SlashAction.neg_slash {β G α γ : Type*} [Group G] [AddGroup α] [SMul γ α]
[SlashAction β G α γ] (k : β) (g : G) (a : α) : (-a) ∣[k;γ] g = -a ∣[k;γ] g :=
eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_left <| by
rw [← SlashAction.add_slash, neg_add_cancel, SlashAction.zero_slash]
@[simp]
theorem SlashAction.smul_slash_of_tower {R β G α : Type*} (γ : Type*) [Group G] [AddMonoid α]
[Monoid γ] [MulAction γ α] [SMul R γ] [SMul R α] [IsScalarTower R γ α] [SlashAction β G α γ]
(k : β) (g : G) (a : α) (r : R) : (r • a) ∣[k;γ] g = r • a ∣[k;γ] g := by
rw [← smul_one_smul γ r a, SlashAction.smul_slash, smul_one_smul]
attribute [simp] SlashAction.zero_slash SlashAction.slash_one SlashAction.smul_slash
SlashAction.add_slash
/-- Slash_action induced by a monoid homomorphism. -/
def monoidHomSlashAction {β G H α γ : Type*} [Group G] [AddMonoid α] [SMul γ α] [Group H]
[SlashAction β G α γ] (h : H →* G) : SlashAction β H α γ where
map k g := SlashAction.map γ k (h g)
zero_slash k g := SlashAction.zero_slash k (h g)
slash_one k a := by simp only [map_one, SlashAction.slash_one]
slash_mul k g gg a := by simp only [map_mul, SlashAction.slash_mul]
smul_slash _ _ := SlashAction.smul_slash _ _
add_slash _ g _ _ := SlashAction.add_slash _ (h g) _ _
namespace ModularForm
noncomputable section
/-- The weight `k` action of `GL(2, ℝ)⁺` on functions `f : ℍ → ℂ`. -/
def slash (k : ℤ) (γ : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (f : ℍ → ℂ) (x : ℍ) : ℂ :=
f (γ • x) * (↑(↑ₘ[ℝ] γ).det : ℂ) ^ (k - 1) * UpperHalfPlane.denom γ x ^ (-k)
variable {k : ℤ} (f : ℍ → ℂ)
section
-- temporary notation until the instance is built
local notation:100 f " ∣[" k "]" γ:100 => ModularForm.slash k γ f
private theorem slash_mul (k : ℤ) (A B : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (f : ℍ → ℂ) :
f ∣[k] (A * B) = (f ∣[k] A) ∣[k] B := by
ext1 x
simp only [slash, UpperHalfPlane.denom_cocycle A B x]
simp only [mul_smul, Subgroup.coe_mul, Units.val_mul, Matrix.det_mul, ofReal_mul, denom, smulAux,
smulAux', num, coe_mk, UpperHalfPlane.coe_smul]
rw [mul_zpow, mul_right_comm _ _ (((↑ₘ[ℝ] B).det : ℂ) ^ (k - 1)),
← mul_assoc, mul_zpow, ← mul_assoc]
private theorem add_slash (k : ℤ) (A : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (f g : ℍ → ℂ) :
(f + g) ∣[k]A = f ∣[k]A + g ∣[k]A := by
ext1
simp only [slash, Pi.add_apply, denom, zpow_neg]
ring
private theorem slash_one (k : ℤ) (f : ℍ → ℂ) : f ∣[k]1 = f :=
funext <| by simp [slash, denom]
variable {α : Type*} [SMul α ℂ] [IsScalarTower α ℂ ℂ]
private theorem smul_slash (k : ℤ) (A : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (f : ℍ → ℂ) (c : α) :
(c • f) ∣[k]A = c • f ∣[k]A := by
simp_rw [← smul_one_smul ℂ c f, ← smul_one_smul ℂ c (f ∣[k]A)]
ext1
simp_rw [slash]
simp only [slash, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, Matrix.GeneralLinearGroup.val_det_apply, Pi.smul_apply]
ring
private theorem zero_slash (k : ℤ) (A : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) : (0 : ℍ → ℂ) ∣[k]A = 0 :=
funext fun _ => by simp only [slash, Pi.zero_apply, zero_mul]
instance : SlashAction ℤ GL(2, ℝ)⁺ (ℍ → ℂ) ℂ where
map := slash
zero_slash := zero_slash
slash_one := slash_one
slash_mul := slash_mul
smul_slash := smul_slash
add_slash := add_slash
end
theorem slash_def (A : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) : f ∣[k] A = slash k A f :=
rfl
instance SLAction : SlashAction ℤ SL(2, ℤ) (ℍ → ℂ) ℂ :=
monoidHomSlashAction
(MonoidHom.comp Matrix.SpecialLinearGroup.toGLPos
(Matrix.SpecialLinearGroup.map (Int.castRingHom ℝ)))
@[simp]
theorem SL_slash (γ : SL(2, ℤ)) : f ∣[k] γ = f ∣[k] (γ : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) :=
rfl
theorem is_invariant_const (A : SL(2, ℤ)) (x : ℂ) :
Function.const ℍ x ∣[(0 : ℤ)] A = Function.const ℍ x := by
funext
simp only [SL_slash, slash_def, slash, Function.const_apply, det_coe, ofReal_one, zero_sub,
zpow_neg, zpow_one, inv_one, mul_one, neg_zero, zpow_zero]
/-- The constant function 1 is invariant under any element of `SL(2, ℤ)`. -/
theorem is_invariant_one (A : SL(2, ℤ)) : (1 : ℍ → ℂ) ∣[(0 : ℤ)] A = (1 : ℍ → ℂ) :=
is_invariant_const _ _
/-- Variant of `is_invariant_one` with the left hand side in simp normal form. -/
@[simp]
theorem is_invariant_one' (A : SL(2, ℤ)) : (1 : ℍ → ℂ) ∣[(0 : ℤ)] (A : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) = 1 := by
simpa using is_invariant_one A
/-- A function `f : ℍ → ℂ` is slash-invariant, of weight `k ∈ ℤ` and level `Γ`,
if for every matrix `γ ∈ Γ` we have `f(γ • z)= (c*z+d)^k f(z)` where `γ= ![![a, b], ![c, d]]`,
and it acts on `ℍ` via Möbius transformations. -/
theorem slash_action_eq'_iff (k : ℤ) (f : ℍ → ℂ) (γ : SL(2, ℤ)) (z : ℍ) :
(f ∣[k] γ) z = f z ↔ f (γ • z) = ((γ 1 0 : ℂ) * z + (γ 1 1 : ℂ)) ^ k * f z := by
simp only [SL_slash, slash_def, ModularForm.slash]
convert inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul₀ (G₀ := ℂ) _ using 2
· rw [mul_comm]
simp only [denom, zpow_neg, det_coe, ofReal_one, one_zpow, mul_one,
sl_moeb]
rfl
· convert zpow_ne_zero k (denom_ne_zero γ z)
theorem mul_slash (k1 k2 : ℤ) (A : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (f g : ℍ → ℂ) :
(f * g) ∣[k1 + k2] A = ((↑ₘA).det : ℝ) • f ∣[k1] A * g ∣[k2] A := by
ext1 x
simp only [slash_def, slash, Matrix.GeneralLinearGroup.val_det_apply,
Pi.mul_apply, Pi.smul_apply, Algebra.smul_mul_assoc, real_smul]
set d : ℂ := ↑(↑ₘ[ℝ] A).det
have h1 : d ^ (k1 + k2 - 1) = d * d ^ (k1 - 1) * d ^ (k2 - 1) := by
have : d ≠ 0 := by
dsimp only [d]
exact_mod_cast Matrix.GLPos.det_ne_zero A
rw [← zpow_one_add₀ this, ← zpow_add₀ this]
congr; ring
have h22 : denom A x ^ (-(k1 + k2)) = denom A x ^ (-k1) * denom A x ^ (-k2) := by
rw [Int.neg_add, zpow_add₀]
exact UpperHalfPlane.denom_ne_zero A x
rw [h1, h22]
ring
theorem mul_slash_SL2 (k1 k2 : ℤ) (A : SL(2, ℤ)) (f g : ℍ → ℂ) :
(f * g) ∣[k1 + k2] A = f ∣[k1] A * g ∣[k2] A :=
calc
(f * g) ∣[k1 + k2] (A : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) =
((↑ₘA).det : ℝ) • f ∣[k1] A * g ∣[k2] A := by
apply mul_slash
_ = (1 : ℝ) • f ∣[k1] A * g ∣[k2] A := by rw [det_coe]
_ = f ∣[k1] A * g ∣[k2] A := by rw [one_smul]
end
end ModularForm
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/ModularForms/SlashActions.lean | 232 | 239 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kevin Buzzard. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Buzzard
-/
import Mathlib.Data.EReal.Basic
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/Data/Real/EReal.lean | 1,131 | 1,139 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Nat.Hom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Basic
/-!
# Univariate monomials
-/
noncomputable section
namespace Polynomial
universe u
variable {R : Type u} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ}
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
theorem monomial_one_eq_iff [Nontrivial R] {i j : ℕ} :
(monomial i 1 : R[X]) = monomial j 1 ↔ i = j := by
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_single, ofFinsupp.injEq]
exact AddMonoidAlgebra.of_injective.eq_iff
instance infinite [Nontrivial R] : Infinite R[X] :=
Infinite.of_injective (fun i => monomial i 1) fun m n h => by simpa [monomial_one_eq_iff] using h
theorem card_support_le_one_iff_monomial {f : R[X]} :
Finset.card f.support ≤ 1 ↔ ∃ n a, f = monomial n a := by
constructor
· intro H
rw [Finset.card_le_one_iff_subset_singleton] at H
rcases H with ⟨n, hn⟩
refine ⟨n, f.coeff n, ?_⟩
ext i
| by_cases hi : i = n
· simp [hi, coeff_monomial]
· have : f.coeff i = 0 := by
rw [← not_mem_support_iff]
exact fun hi' => hi (Finset.mem_singleton.1 (hn hi'))
simp [this, Ne.symm hi, coeff_monomial]
· rintro ⟨n, a, rfl⟩
rw [← Finset.card_singleton n]
apply Finset.card_le_card
exact support_monomial' _ _
theorem ringHom_ext {S} [Semiring S] {f g : R[X] →+* S} (h₁ : ∀ a, f (C a) = g (C a))
(h₂ : f X = g X) : f = g := by
set f' := f.comp (toFinsuppIso R).symm.toRingHom with hf'
set g' := g.comp (toFinsuppIso R).symm.toRingHom with hg'
have A : f' = g' := by
ext
simp [f', g', h₁, RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Monomial.lean | 39 | 56 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Tendsto
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Accumulate
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousOn
import Mathlib.Topology.Ultrafilter
import Mathlib.Topology.Defs.Ultrafilter
/-!
# Compact sets and compact spaces
## Main results
* `isCompact_univ_pi`: **Tychonov's theorem** - an arbitrary product of compact sets
is compact.
-/
open Set Filter Topology TopologicalSpace Function
universe u v
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {ι : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {s t : Set X} {f : X → Y}
-- compact sets
section Compact
lemma IsCompact.exists_clusterPt (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter X} [NeBot f] (hf : f ≤ 𝓟 s) :
∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f := hs hf
lemma IsCompact.exists_mapClusterPt {ι : Type*} (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter ι} [NeBot f]
{u : ι → X} (hf : Filter.map u f ≤ 𝓟 s) :
∃ x ∈ s, MapClusterPt x f u := hs hf
lemma IsCompact.exists_clusterPt_of_frequently {l : Filter X} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hl : ∃ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) : ∃ a ∈ s, ClusterPt a l :=
let ⟨a, has, ha⟩ := @hs _ (frequently_mem_iff_neBot.mp hl) inf_le_right
⟨a, has, ha.mono inf_le_left⟩
lemma IsCompact.exists_mapClusterPt_of_frequently {l : Filter ι} {f : ι → X} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hf : ∃ᶠ x in l, f x ∈ s) : ∃ a ∈ s, MapClusterPt a l f :=
hs.exists_clusterPt_of_frequently hf
/-- The complement to a compact set belongs to a filter `f` if it belongs to each filter
`𝓝 x ⊓ f`, `x ∈ s`. -/
theorem IsCompact.compl_mem_sets (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter X} (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, sᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x ⊓ f) :
sᶜ ∈ f := by
contrapose! hf
simp only [not_mem_iff_inf_principal_compl, compl_compl, inf_assoc] at hf ⊢
exact @hs _ hf inf_le_right
/-- The complement to a compact set belongs to a filter `f` if each `x ∈ s` has a neighborhood `t`
within `s` such that `tᶜ` belongs to `f`. -/
theorem IsCompact.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter X}
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, tᶜ ∈ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
refine hs.compl_mem_sets fun x hx => ?_
rcases hf x hx with ⟨t, ht, hst⟩
replace ht := mem_inf_principal.1 ht
apply mem_inf_of_inter ht hst
rintro x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ hs
exact h₂ (h₁ hs)
/-- If `p : Set X → Prop` is stable under restriction and union, and each point `x`
of a compact set `s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `p t`, then `p s` holds. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem IsCompact.induction_on (hs : IsCompact s) {p : Set X → Prop} (he : p ∅)
(hmono : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, s ⊆ t → p t → p s) (hunion : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, p s → p t → p (s ∪ t))
(hnhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, p t) : p s := by
let f : Filter X := comk p he (fun _t ht _s hsub ↦ hmono hsub ht) (fun _s hs _t ht ↦ hunion hs ht)
have : sᶜ ∈ f := hs.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (by simpa [f] using hnhds)
rwa [← compl_compl s]
/-- The intersection of a compact set and a closed set is a compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.inter_right (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsClosed t) : IsCompact (s ∩ t) := by
intro f hnf hstf
obtain ⟨x, hsx, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f :=
hs (le_trans hstf (le_principal_iff.2 inter_subset_left))
have : x ∈ t := ht.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot <|
hx.mono <| le_trans hstf (le_principal_iff.2 inter_subset_right)
exact ⟨x, ⟨hsx, this⟩, hx⟩
/-- The intersection of a closed set and a compact set is a compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.inter_left (ht : IsCompact t) (hs : IsClosed s) : IsCompact (s ∩ t) :=
inter_comm t s ▸ ht.inter_right hs
/-- The set difference of a compact set and an open set is a compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.diff (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsCompact (s \ t) :=
hs.inter_right (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr ht)
/-- A closed subset of a compact set is a compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.of_isClosed_subset (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsClosed t) (h : t ⊆ s) :
IsCompact t :=
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h ▸ hs.inter_right ht
theorem IsCompact.image_of_continuousOn {f : X → Y} (hs : IsCompact s) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) :
IsCompact (f '' s) := by
intro l lne ls
have : NeBot (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
comap_inf_principal_neBot_of_image_mem lne (le_principal_iff.1 ls)
obtain ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) := @hs _ this inf_le_right
haveI := hx.neBot
use f x, mem_image_of_mem f hxs
have : Tendsto f (𝓝 x ⊓ (comap f l ⊓ 𝓟 s)) (𝓝 (f x) ⊓ l) := by
convert (hf x hxs).inf (@tendsto_comap _ _ f l) using 1
rw [nhdsWithin]
ac_rfl
exact this.neBot
theorem IsCompact.image {f : X → Y} (hs : IsCompact s) (hf : Continuous f) : IsCompact (f '' s) :=
hs.image_of_continuousOn hf.continuousOn
theorem IsCompact.adherence_nhdset {f : Filter X} (hs : IsCompact s) (hf₂ : f ≤ 𝓟 s)
(ht₁ : IsOpen t) (ht₂ : ∀ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f → x ∈ t) : t ∈ f :=
Classical.by_cases mem_of_eq_bot fun (this : f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ ≠ ⊥) =>
let ⟨x, hx, (hfx : ClusterPt x <| f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ)⟩ := @hs _ ⟨this⟩ <| inf_le_of_left_le hf₂
have : x ∈ t := ht₂ x hx hfx.of_inf_left
have : tᶜ ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x := inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (IsOpen.mem_nhds ht₁ this)
have A : 𝓝[tᶜ] x = ⊥ := empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| compl_inter_self t ▸ this
have : 𝓝[tᶜ] x ≠ ⊥ := hfx.of_inf_right.ne
absurd A this
theorem isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds :
IsCompact s ↔ ∀ f : Ultrafilter X, ↑f ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ x ∈ s, ↑f ≤ 𝓝 x := by
refine (forall_neBot_le_iff ?_).trans ?_
· rintro f g hle ⟨x, hxs, hxf⟩
exact ⟨x, hxs, hxf.mono hle⟩
· simp only [Ultrafilter.clusterPt_iff]
alias ⟨IsCompact.ultrafilter_le_nhds, _⟩ := isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds
theorem isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds' :
IsCompact s ↔ ∀ f : Ultrafilter X, s ∈ f → ∃ x ∈ s, ↑f ≤ 𝓝 x := by
simp only [isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds, le_principal_iff, Ultrafilter.mem_coe]
alias ⟨IsCompact.ultrafilter_le_nhds', _⟩ := isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds'
/-- If a compact set belongs to a filter and this filter has a unique cluster point `y` in this set,
then the filter is less than or equal to `𝓝 y`. -/
lemma IsCompact.le_nhds_of_unique_clusterPt (hs : IsCompact s) {l : Filter X} {y : X}
(hmem : s ∈ l) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x l → x = y) : l ≤ 𝓝 y := by
refine le_iff_ultrafilter.2 fun f hf ↦ ?_
rcases hs.ultrafilter_le_nhds' f (hf hmem) with ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩
convert ← hx
exact h x hxs (.mono (.of_le_nhds hx) hf)
/-- If values of `f : Y → X` belong to a compact set `s` eventually along a filter `l`
and `y` is a unique `MapClusterPt` for `f` along `l` in `s`,
then `f` tends to `𝓝 y` along `l`. -/
lemma IsCompact.tendsto_nhds_of_unique_mapClusterPt {Y} {l : Filter Y} {y : X} {f : Y → X}
(hs : IsCompact s) (hmem : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ∈ s) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, MapClusterPt x l f → x = y) :
Tendsto f l (𝓝 y) :=
hs.le_nhds_of_unique_clusterPt (mem_map.2 hmem) h
/-- For every open directed cover of a compact set, there exists a single element of the
cover which itself includes the set. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_directed_cover {ι : Type v} [hι : Nonempty ι] (hs : IsCompact s)
(U : ι → Set X) (hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) (hdU : Directed (· ⊆ ·) U) :
∃ i, s ⊆ U i :=
hι.elim fun i₀ =>
IsCompact.induction_on hs ⟨i₀, empty_subset _⟩ (fun _ _ hs ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨i, hs.trans hi⟩)
(fun _ _ ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ =>
let ⟨k, hki, hkj⟩ := hdU i j
⟨k, union_subset (Subset.trans hi hki) (Subset.trans hj hkj)⟩)
fun _x hx =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_iUnion.1 (hsU hx)
⟨U i, mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds (IsOpen.mem_nhds (hUo i) hi), i, Subset.refl _⟩
/-- For every open cover of a compact set, there exists a finite subcover. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_finite_subcover {ι : Type v} (hs : IsCompact s) (U : ι → Set X)
(hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) : ∃ t : Finset ι, s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i :=
hs.elim_directed_cover _ (fun _ => isOpen_biUnion fun i _ => hUo i)
(iUnion_eq_iUnion_finset U ▸ hsU)
(directed_of_isDirected_le fun _ _ h => biUnion_subset_biUnion_left h)
lemma IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet' (hs : IsCompact s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x hx, U x hx ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ t : Finset s, (⋃ x ∈ t, U x.1 x.2) ∈ 𝓝ˢ s := by
rcases hs.elim_finite_subcover (fun x : s ↦ interior (U x x.2)) (fun _ ↦ isOpen_interior)
fun x hx ↦ mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 <| hU _ _⟩ with ⟨t, hst⟩
refine ⟨t, mem_nhdsSet_iff_forall.2 fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
rcases mem_iUnion₂.1 (hst hx) with ⟨y, hyt, hy⟩
refine mem_of_superset ?_ (subset_biUnion_of_mem hyt)
exact mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.1 hy
lemma IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet (hs : IsCompact s) {U : X → Set X}
(hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ t : Finset X, (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ (⋃ x ∈ t, U x) ∈ 𝓝ˢ s := by
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := hs.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet' (fun x _ => U x) hU
classical
exact ⟨t.image (↑), fun x hx =>
let ⟨y, _, hyx⟩ := Finset.mem_image.1 hx
hyx ▸ y.2,
by rwa [Finset.set_biUnion_finset_image]⟩
theorem IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover' (hs : IsCompact s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x (hx : x ∈ s), U x ‹x ∈ s› ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ t : Finset s, s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U (x : s) x.2 :=
(hs.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet' U hU).imp fun _ ↦ subset_of_mem_nhdsSet
theorem IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover (hs : IsCompact s) (U : X → Set X) (hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Finset X, (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x :=
(hs.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet hU).imp fun _ h ↦ h.imp_right subset_of_mem_nhdsSet
theorem IsCompact.elim_nhdsWithin_subcover' (hs : IsCompact s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x (hx : x ∈ s), U x hx ∈ 𝓝[s] x) : ∃ t : Finset s, s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x x.2 := by
choose V V_nhds hV using fun x hx => mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.1 (hU x hx)
refine (hs.elim_nhds_subcover' V V_nhds).imp fun t ht =>
subset_trans ?_ (iUnion₂_mono fun x _ => hV x x.2)
simpa [← iUnion_inter, ← iUnion_coe_set]
theorem IsCompact.elim_nhdsWithin_subcover (hs : IsCompact s) (U : X → Set X)
(hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝[s] x) : ∃ t : Finset X, (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x := by
choose! V V_nhds hV using fun x hx => mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.1 (hU x hx)
refine (hs.elim_nhds_subcover V V_nhds).imp fun t ⟨t_sub_s, ht⟩ =>
⟨t_sub_s, subset_trans ?_ (iUnion₂_mono fun x hx => hV x (t_sub_s x hx))⟩
simpa [← iUnion_inter]
/-- The neighborhood filter of a compact set is disjoint with a filter `l` if and only if the
neighborhood filter of each point of this set is disjoint with `l`. -/
theorem IsCompact.disjoint_nhdsSet_left {l : Filter X} (hs : IsCompact s) :
Disjoint (𝓝ˢ s) l ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint (𝓝 x) l := by
refine ⟨fun h x hx => h.mono_left <| nhds_le_nhdsSet hx, fun H => ?_⟩
choose! U hxU hUl using fun x hx => (nhds_basis_opens x).disjoint_iff_left.1 (H x hx)
choose hxU hUo using hxU
rcases hs.elim_nhds_subcover U fun x hx => (hUo x hx).mem_nhds (hxU x hx) with ⟨t, hts, hst⟩
refine (hasBasis_nhdsSet _).disjoint_iff_left.2
⟨⋃ x ∈ t, U x, ⟨isOpen_biUnion fun x hx => hUo x (hts x hx), hst⟩, ?_⟩
rw [compl_iUnion₂, biInter_finset_mem]
exact fun x hx => hUl x (hts x hx)
/-- A filter `l` is disjoint with the neighborhood filter of a compact set if and only if it is
disjoint with the neighborhood filter of each point of this set. -/
theorem IsCompact.disjoint_nhdsSet_right {l : Filter X} (hs : IsCompact s) :
Disjoint l (𝓝ˢ s) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint l (𝓝 x) := by
simpa only [disjoint_comm] using hs.disjoint_nhdsSet_left
-- TODO: reformulate using `Disjoint`
/-- For every directed family of closed sets whose intersection avoids a compact set,
there exists a single element of the family which itself avoids this compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_directed_family_closed {ι : Type v} [Nonempty ι] (hs : IsCompact s)
(t : ι → Set X) (htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅)
(hdt : Directed (· ⊇ ·) t) : ∃ i : ι, s ∩ t i = ∅ :=
let ⟨t, ht⟩ :=
hs.elim_directed_cover (compl ∘ t) (fun i => (htc i).isOpen_compl)
(by
simpa only [subset_def, not_forall, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_iUnion, exists_prop,
mem_inter_iff, not_and, mem_iInter, mem_compl_iff] using hst)
(hdt.mono_comp _ fun _ _ => compl_subset_compl.mpr)
⟨t, by
simpa only [subset_def, not_forall, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_iUnion, exists_prop,
mem_inter_iff, not_and, mem_iInter, mem_compl_iff] using ht⟩
-- TODO: reformulate using `Disjoint`
/-- For every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids a compact set,
there exists a finite subfamily whose intersection avoids this compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_finite_subfamily_closed {ι : Type v} (hs : IsCompact s)
(t : ι → Set X) (htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅) :
∃ u : Finset ι, (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅ :=
hs.elim_directed_family_closed _ (fun _ ↦ isClosed_biInter fun _ _ ↦ htc _)
(by rwa [← iInter_eq_iInter_finset])
(directed_of_isDirected_le fun _ _ h ↦ biInter_subset_biInter_left h)
/-- To show that a compact set intersects the intersection of a family of closed sets,
it is sufficient to show that it intersects every finite subfamily. -/
theorem IsCompact.inter_iInter_nonempty {ι : Type v} (hs : IsCompact s) (t : ι → Set X)
(htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : ∀ u : Finset ι, (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i).Nonempty) :
(s ∩ ⋂ i, t i).Nonempty := by
contrapose! hst
exact hs.elim_finite_subfamily_closed t htc hst
/-- Cantor's intersection theorem for `iInter`:
the intersection of a directed family of nonempty compact closed sets is nonempty. -/
theorem IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed
{ι : Type v} [hι : Nonempty ι] (t : ι → Set X) (htd : Directed (· ⊇ ·) t)
(htn : ∀ i, (t i).Nonempty) (htc : ∀ i, IsCompact (t i)) (htcl : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) :
(⋂ i, t i).Nonempty := by
let i₀ := hι.some
suffices (t i₀ ∩ ⋂ i, t i).Nonempty by
rwa [inter_eq_right.mpr (iInter_subset _ i₀)] at this
simp only [nonempty_iff_ne_empty] at htn ⊢
apply mt ((htc i₀).elim_directed_family_closed t htcl)
push_neg
simp only [← nonempty_iff_ne_empty] at htn ⊢
refine ⟨htd, fun i => ?_⟩
rcases htd i₀ i with ⟨j, hji₀, hji⟩
exact (htn j).mono (subset_inter hji₀ hji)
/-- Cantor's intersection theorem for `sInter`:
| the intersection of a directed family of nonempty compact closed sets is nonempty. -/
theorem IsCompact.nonempty_sInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed
{S : Set (Set X)} [hS : Nonempty S] (hSd : DirectedOn (· ⊇ ·) S) (hSn : ∀ U ∈ S, U.Nonempty)
(hSc : ∀ U ∈ S, IsCompact U) (hScl : ∀ U ∈ S, IsClosed U) : (⋂₀ S).Nonempty := by
rw [sInter_eq_iInter]
exact IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed _
(DirectedOn.directed_val hSd) (fun i ↦ hSn i i.2) (fun i ↦ hSc i i.2) (fun i ↦ hScl i i.2)
/-- Cantor's intersection theorem for sequences indexed by `ℕ`:
the intersection of a decreasing sequence of nonempty compact closed sets is nonempty. -/
theorem IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_sequence_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed (t : ℕ → Set X)
(htd : ∀ i, t (i + 1) ⊆ t i) (htn : ∀ i, (t i).Nonempty) (ht0 : IsCompact (t 0))
(htcl : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) : (⋂ i, t i).Nonempty :=
have tmono : Antitone t := antitone_nat_of_succ_le htd
| Mathlib/Topology/Compactness/Compact.lean | 290 | 303 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Field
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Basic
/-!
# Definition of well-known power series
In this file we define the following power series:
* `PowerSeries.invUnitsSub`: given `u : Rˣ`, this is the series for `1 / (u - x)`.
It is given by `∑ n, x ^ n /ₚ u ^ (n + 1)`.
* `PowerSeries.invOneSubPow`: given a commutative ring `S` and a number `d : ℕ`,
`PowerSeries.invOneSubPow S d` is the multiplicative inverse of `(1 - X) ^ d` in `S⟦X⟧ˣ`.
When `d` is `0`, `PowerSeries.invOneSubPow S d` will just be `1`. When `d` is positive,
`PowerSeries.invOneSubPow S d` will be `∑ n, Nat.choose (d - 1 + n) (d - 1)`.
* `PowerSeries.sin`, `PowerSeries.cos`, `PowerSeries.exp` : power series for sin, cosine, and
exponential functions.
-/
namespace PowerSeries
section Ring
variable {R S : Type*} [Ring R] [Ring S]
/-- The power series for `1 / (u - x)`. -/
def invUnitsSub (u : Rˣ) : PowerSeries R :=
mk fun n => 1 /ₚ u ^ (n + 1)
@[simp]
theorem coeff_invUnitsSub (u : Rˣ) (n : ℕ) : coeff R n (invUnitsSub u) = 1 /ₚ u ^ (n + 1) :=
coeff_mk _ _
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_invUnitsSub (u : Rˣ) : constantCoeff R (invUnitsSub u) = 1 /ₚ u := by
rw [← coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff_apply, coeff_invUnitsSub, zero_add, pow_one]
@[simp]
theorem invUnitsSub_mul_X (u : Rˣ) : invUnitsSub u * X = invUnitsSub u * C R u - 1 := by
ext (_ | n)
· simp
· simp [n.succ_ne_zero, pow_succ']
@[simp]
theorem invUnitsSub_mul_sub (u : Rˣ) : invUnitsSub u * (C R u - X) = 1 := by
simp [mul_sub, sub_sub_cancel]
theorem map_invUnitsSub (f : R →+* S) (u : Rˣ) :
map f (invUnitsSub u) = invUnitsSub (Units.map (f : R →* S) u) := by
ext
simp only [← map_pow, coeff_map, coeff_invUnitsSub, one_divp]
rfl
end Ring
section invOneSubPow
variable (S : Type*) [CommRing S] (d : ℕ)
/--
(1 + X + X^2 + ...) * (1 - X) = 1.
Note that the power series `1 + X + X^2 + ...` is written as `mk 1` where `1` is the constant
function so that `mk 1` is the power series with all coefficients equal to one.
-/
theorem mk_one_mul_one_sub_eq_one : (mk 1 : S⟦X⟧) * (1 - X) = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm, PowerSeries.ext_iff]
intro n
cases n with
| zero => simp
| succ n => simp [sub_mul]
/--
Note that `mk 1` is the constant function `1` so the power series `1 + X + X^2 + ...`. This theorem
states that for any `d : ℕ`, `(1 + X + X^2 + ... : S⟦X⟧) ^ (d + 1)` is equal to the power series
| `mk fun n => Nat.choose (d + n) d : S⟦X⟧`.
-/
theorem mk_one_pow_eq_mk_choose_add :
(mk 1 : S⟦X⟧) ^ (d + 1) = (mk fun n => Nat.choose (d + n) d : S⟦X⟧) := by
induction d with
| zero => ext; simp
| Mathlib/RingTheory/PowerSeries/WellKnown.lean | 84 | 89 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.