Context stringlengths 227 76.5k | target stringlengths 0 11.6k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 16 3.69k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kyle Miller. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kyle Miller
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Filtered.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.Limits.Basic
/-!
# Topological Kőnig's lemma
A topological version of Kőnig's lemma is that the inverse limit of nonempty compact Hausdorff
spaces is nonempty. (Note: this can be generalized further to inverse limits of nonempty compact
T0 spaces, where all the maps are closed maps; see [Stone1979] --- however there is an erratum
for Theorem 4 that the element in the inverse limit can have cofinally many components that are
not closed points.)
We give this in a more general form, which is that cofiltered limits
of nonempty compact Hausdorff spaces are nonempty
(`nonempty_limitCone_of_compact_t2_cofiltered_system`).
This also applies to inverse limits, where `{J : Type u} [Preorder J] [IsDirected J (≤)]` and
`F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ TopCat`.
The theorem is specialized to nonempty finite types (which are compact Hausdorff with the
discrete topology) in lemmas `nonempty_sections_of_finite_cofiltered_system` and
`nonempty_sections_of_finite_inverse_system` in the file `Mathlib.CategoryTheory.CofilteredSystem`.
(See <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/086J> for the Set version.)
-/
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits
universe v u w
noncomputable section
namespace TopCat
section TopologicalKonig
variable {J : Type u} [SmallCategory J]
variable (F : J ⥤ TopCat.{v})
private abbrev FiniteDiagramArrow {J : Type u} [SmallCategory J] (G : Finset J) :=
Σ' (X Y : J) (_ : X ∈ G) (_ : Y ∈ G), X ⟶ Y
private abbrev FiniteDiagram (J : Type u) [SmallCategory J] :=
Σ G : Finset J, Finset (FiniteDiagramArrow G)
/-- Partial sections of a cofiltered limit are sections when restricted to
a finite subset of objects and morphisms of `J`.
-/
def partialSections {J : Type u} [SmallCategory J] (F : J ⥤ TopCat.{v}) {G : Finset J}
(H : Finset (FiniteDiagramArrow G)) : Set (∀ j, F.obj j) :=
{u | ∀ {f : FiniteDiagramArrow G} (_ : f ∈ H), F.map f.2.2.2.2 (u f.1) = u f.2.1}
theorem partialSections.nonempty [IsCofilteredOrEmpty J] [h : ∀ j : J, Nonempty (F.obj j)]
{G : Finset J} (H : Finset (FiniteDiagramArrow G)) : (partialSections F H).Nonempty := by
classical
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty J
· exact ⟨isEmptyElim, fun {j} => IsEmpty.elim' inferInstance j.1⟩
haveI : IsCofiltered J := ⟨⟩
use fun j : J =>
if hj : j ∈ G then F.map (IsCofiltered.infTo G H hj) (h (IsCofiltered.inf G H)).some
else (h _).some
rintro ⟨X, Y, hX, hY, f⟩ hf
dsimp only
rwa [dif_pos hX, dif_pos hY, ← comp_app, ← F.map_comp, @IsCofiltered.infTo_commutes _ _ _ G H]
theorem partialSections.directed :
Directed Superset fun G : FiniteDiagram J => partialSections F G.2 := by
classical
intro A B
let ιA : FiniteDiagramArrow A.1 → FiniteDiagramArrow (A.1 ⊔ B.1) := fun f =>
⟨f.1, f.2.1, Finset.mem_union_left _ f.2.2.1, Finset.mem_union_left _ f.2.2.2.1, f.2.2.2.2⟩
let ιB : FiniteDiagramArrow B.1 → FiniteDiagramArrow (A.1 ⊔ B.1) := fun f =>
⟨f.1, f.2.1, Finset.mem_union_right _ f.2.2.1, Finset.mem_union_right _ f.2.2.2.1, f.2.2.2.2⟩
refine ⟨⟨A.1 ⊔ B.1, A.2.image ιA ⊔ B.2.image ιB⟩, ?_, ?_⟩
· rintro u hu f hf
have : ιA f ∈ A.2.image ιA ⊔ B.2.image ιB := by
apply Finset.mem_union_left
rw [Finset.mem_image]
exact ⟨f, hf, rfl⟩
exact hu this
· rintro u hu f hf
have : ιB f ∈ A.2.image ιA ⊔ B.2.image ιB := by
apply Finset.mem_union_right
rw [Finset.mem_image]
exact ⟨f, hf, rfl⟩
exact hu this
theorem partialSections.closed [∀ j : J, T2Space (F.obj j)] {G : Finset J}
(H : Finset (FiniteDiagramArrow G)) : IsClosed (partialSections F H) := by
have :
partialSections F H =
⋂ (f : FiniteDiagramArrow G) (_ : f ∈ H), {u | F.map f.2.2.2.2 (u f.1) = u f.2.1} := by
ext1
simp only [Set.mem_iInter, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
rfl
rw [this]
apply isClosed_biInter
| intro f _
apply isClosed_eq <;> fun_prop
/-- Cofiltered limits of nonempty compact Hausdorff spaces are nonempty topological spaces.
-/
theorem nonempty_limitCone_of_compact_t2_cofiltered_system (F : J ⥤ TopCat.{max v u})
[IsCofilteredOrEmpty J]
[∀ j : J, Nonempty (F.obj j)] [∀ j : J, CompactSpace (F.obj j)] [∀ j : J, T2Space (F.obj j)] :
Nonempty (TopCat.limitCone F).pt := by
classical
obtain ⟨u, hu⟩ :=
IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed (fun G => partialSections F _)
(partialSections.directed F) (fun G => partialSections.nonempty F _)
(fun G => IsClosed.isCompact (partialSections.closed F _)) fun G =>
partialSections.closed F _
use u
intro X Y f
let G : FiniteDiagram J :=
| Mathlib/Topology/Category/TopCat/Limits/Konig.lean | 106 | 123 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Arthur Paulino. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Arthur Paulino, Kyle Miller
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Clique
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Setoid.Partition
import Mathlib.Order.Antichain
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Ring
/-!
# Graph Coloring
This module defines colorings of simple graphs (also known as proper colorings in the literature).
A graph coloring is the attribution of "colors" to all of its vertices such that adjacent vertices
have different colors.
A coloring can be represented as a homomorphism into a complete graph, whose vertices represent
the colors.
## Main definitions
* `G.Coloring α` is the type of `α`-colorings of a simple graph `G`,
with `α` being the set of available colors. The type is defined to
be homomorphisms from `G` into the complete graph on `α`, and
colorings have a coercion to `V → α`.
* `G.Colorable n` is the proposition that `G` is `n`-colorable, which
is whether there exists a coloring with at most *n* colors.
* `G.chromaticNumber` is the minimal `n` such that `G` is `n`-colorable,
or `⊤` if it cannot be colored with finitely many colors.
(Cardinal-valued chromatic numbers are more niche, so we stick to `ℕ∞`.)
We write `G.chromaticNumber ≠ ⊤` to mean a graph is colorable with finitely many colors.
* `C.colorClass c` is the set of vertices colored by `c : α` in the coloring `C : G.Coloring α`.
* `C.colorClasses` is the set containing all color classes.
## TODO
* Gather material from:
* https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib/blob/simple_graph_matching/src/combinatorics/simple_graph/coloring.lean
* https://github.com/kmill/lean-graphcoloring/blob/master/src/graph.lean
* Trees
* Planar graphs
* Chromatic polynomials
* develop API for partial colorings, likely as colorings of subgraphs (`H.coe.Coloring α`)
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Fintype Function
universe u v
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V : Type u} (G : SimpleGraph V) {n : ℕ}
/-- An `α`-coloring of a simple graph `G` is a homomorphism of `G` into the complete graph on `α`.
This is also known as a proper coloring.
-/
abbrev Coloring (α : Type v) := G →g (⊤ : SimpleGraph α)
variable {G}
variable {α β : Type*} (C : G.Coloring α)
theorem Coloring.valid {v w : V} (h : G.Adj v w) : C v ≠ C w :=
C.map_rel h
/-- Construct a term of `SimpleGraph.Coloring` using a function that
assigns vertices to colors and a proof that it is as proper coloring.
(Note: this is a definitionally the constructor for `SimpleGraph.Hom`,
but with a syntactically better proper coloring hypothesis.)
-/
@[match_pattern]
def Coloring.mk (color : V → α) (valid : ∀ {v w : V}, G.Adj v w → color v ≠ color w) :
G.Coloring α :=
⟨color, @valid⟩
/-- The color class of a given color.
-/
def Coloring.colorClass (c : α) : Set V := { v : V | C v = c }
/-- The set containing all color classes. -/
def Coloring.colorClasses : Set (Set V) := (Setoid.ker C).classes
theorem Coloring.mem_colorClass (v : V) : v ∈ C.colorClass (C v) := rfl
theorem Coloring.colorClasses_isPartition : Setoid.IsPartition C.colorClasses :=
Setoid.isPartition_classes (Setoid.ker C)
theorem Coloring.mem_colorClasses {v : V} : C.colorClass (C v) ∈ C.colorClasses :=
⟨v, rfl⟩
theorem Coloring.colorClasses_finite [Finite α] : C.colorClasses.Finite :=
Setoid.finite_classes_ker _
theorem Coloring.card_colorClasses_le [Fintype α] [Fintype C.colorClasses] :
Fintype.card C.colorClasses ≤ Fintype.card α := by
simp only [colorClasses]
convert Setoid.card_classes_ker_le C
theorem Coloring.not_adj_of_mem_colorClass {c : α} {v w : V} (hv : v ∈ C.colorClass c)
(hw : w ∈ C.colorClass c) : ¬G.Adj v w := fun h => C.valid h (Eq.trans hv (Eq.symm hw))
theorem Coloring.color_classes_independent (c : α) : IsAntichain G.Adj (C.colorClass c) :=
fun _ hv _ hw _ => C.not_adj_of_mem_colorClass hv hw
-- TODO make this computable
noncomputable instance [Fintype V] [Fintype α] : Fintype (Coloring G α) := by
classical
change Fintype (RelHom G.Adj (⊤ : SimpleGraph α).Adj)
apply Fintype.ofInjective _ RelHom.coe_fn_injective
variable (G)
/-- Whether a graph can be colored by at most `n` colors. -/
def Colorable (n : ℕ) : Prop := Nonempty (G.Coloring (Fin n))
/-- The coloring of an empty graph. -/
def coloringOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty V] : G.Coloring α :=
Coloring.mk isEmptyElim fun {v} => isEmptyElim v
theorem colorable_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty V] (n : ℕ) : G.Colorable n :=
⟨G.coloringOfIsEmpty⟩
theorem isEmpty_of_colorable_zero (h : G.Colorable 0) : IsEmpty V := by
constructor
intro v
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := h.some v
exact Nat.not_lt_zero _ hi
@[simp]
lemma colorable_zero_iff : G.Colorable 0 ↔ IsEmpty V :=
⟨G.isEmpty_of_colorable_zero, fun _ ↦ G.colorable_of_isEmpty 0⟩
/-- The "tautological" coloring of a graph, using the vertices of the graph as colors. -/
def selfColoring : G.Coloring V := Coloring.mk id fun {_ _} => G.ne_of_adj
/-- The chromatic number of a graph is the minimal number of colors needed to color it.
This is `⊤` (infinity) iff `G` isn't colorable with finitely many colors.
If `G` is colorable, then `ENat.toNat G.chromaticNumber` is the `ℕ`-valued chromatic number. -/
noncomputable def chromaticNumber : ℕ∞ := ⨅ n ∈ setOf G.Colorable, (n : ℕ∞)
lemma chromaticNumber_eq_biInf {G : SimpleGraph V} :
G.chromaticNumber = ⨅ n ∈ setOf G.Colorable, (n : ℕ∞) := rfl
lemma chromaticNumber_eq_iInf {G : SimpleGraph V} :
G.chromaticNumber = ⨅ n : {m | G.Colorable m}, (n : ℕ∞) := by
rw [chromaticNumber, iInf_subtype]
lemma Colorable.chromaticNumber_eq_sInf {G : SimpleGraph V} {n} (h : G.Colorable n) :
G.chromaticNumber = sInf {n' : ℕ | G.Colorable n'} := by
rw [ENat.coe_sInf, chromaticNumber]
exact ⟨_, h⟩
/-- Given an embedding, there is an induced embedding of colorings. -/
def recolorOfEmbedding {α β : Type*} (f : α ↪ β) : G.Coloring α ↪ G.Coloring β where
toFun C := (Embedding.completeGraph f).toHom.comp C
inj' := by -- this was strangely painful; seems like missing lemmas about embeddings
intro C C' h
dsimp only at h
ext v
apply (Embedding.completeGraph f).inj'
| change ((Embedding.completeGraph f).toHom.comp C) v = _
rw [h]
rfl
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Coloring.lean | 173 | 175 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.AbstractFuncEq
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.ModularForms.JacobiTheta.Bounds
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gamma.Deligne
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.MellinEqDirichlet
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.RemovableSingularity
/-!
# Even Hurwitz zeta functions
In this file we study the functions on `ℂ` which are the meromorphic continuation of the following
series (convergent for `1 < re s`), where `a ∈ ℝ` is a parameter:
`hurwitzZetaEven a s = 1 / 2 * ∑' n : ℤ, 1 / |n + a| ^ s`
and
`cosZeta a s = ∑' n : ℕ, cos (2 * π * a * n) / |n| ^ s`.
Note that the term for `n = -a` in the first sum is omitted if `a` is an integer, and the term for
`n = 0` is omitted in the second sum (always).
Of course, we cannot *define* these functions by the above formulae (since existence of the
meromorphic continuation is not at all obvious); we in fact construct them as Mellin transforms of
various versions of the Jacobi theta function.
We also define completed versions of these functions with nicer functional equations (satisfying
`completedHurwitzZetaEven a s = Gammaℝ s * hurwitzZetaEven a s`, and similarly for `cosZeta`); and
modified versions with a subscript `0`, which are entire functions differing from the above by
multiples of `1 / s` and `1 / (1 - s)`.
## Main definitions and theorems
* `hurwitzZetaEven` and `cosZeta`: the zeta functions
* `completedHurwitzZetaEven` and `completedCosZeta`: completed variants
* `differentiableAt_hurwitzZetaEven` and `differentiableAt_cosZeta`:
differentiability away from `s = 1`
* `completedHurwitzZetaEven_one_sub`: the functional equation
`completedHurwitzZetaEven a (1 - s) = completedCosZeta a s`
* `hasSum_int_hurwitzZetaEven` and `hasSum_nat_cosZeta`: relation between the zeta functions and
the corresponding Dirichlet series for `1 < re s`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Complex Filter Topology Asymptotics Real Set MeasureTheory
namespace HurwitzZeta
section kernel_defs
/-!
## Definitions and elementary properties of kernels
-/
/-- Even Hurwitz zeta kernel (function whose Mellin transform will be the even part of the
completed Hurwit zeta function). See `evenKernel_def` for the defining formula, and
`hasSum_int_evenKernel` for an expression as a sum over `ℤ`. -/
@[irreducible] def evenKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(show Function.Periodic
(fun ξ : ℝ ↦ rexp (-π * ξ ^ 2 * x) * re (jacobiTheta₂ (ξ * I * x) (I * x))) 1 by
intro ξ
simp only [ofReal_add, ofReal_one, add_mul, one_mul, jacobiTheta₂_add_left']
have : cexp (-↑π * I * ((I * ↑x) + 2 * (↑ξ * I * ↑x))) = rexp (π * (x + 2 * ξ * x)) := by
ring_nf
simp [I_sq]
rw [this, re_ofReal_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← Real.exp_add]
congr
ring).lift a
lemma evenKernel_def (a x : ℝ) :
↑(evenKernel ↑a x) = cexp (-π * a ^ 2 * x) * jacobiTheta₂ (a * I * x) (I * x) := by
simp [evenKernel, re_eq_add_conj, jacobiTheta₂_conj, ← mul_two,
mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℂ)]
/-- For `x ≤ 0` the defining sum diverges, so the kernel is 0. -/
lemma evenKernel_undef (a : UnitAddCircle) {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) : evenKernel a x = 0 := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with
| H a' => simp [← ofReal_inj, evenKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂_undef _ (by simpa : (I * ↑x).im ≤ 0)]
/-- Cosine Hurwitz zeta kernel. See `cosKernel_def` for the defining formula, and
`hasSum_int_cosKernel` for expression as a sum. -/
@[irreducible] def cosKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(show Function.Periodic (fun ξ : ℝ ↦ re (jacobiTheta₂ ξ (I * x))) 1 by
intro ξ; simp [jacobiTheta₂_add_left]).lift a
lemma cosKernel_def (a x : ℝ) : ↑(cosKernel ↑a x) = jacobiTheta₂ a (I * x) := by
simp [cosKernel, re_eq_add_conj, jacobiTheta₂_conj, ← mul_two,
mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℂ)]
lemma cosKernel_undef (a : UnitAddCircle) {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) : cosKernel a x = 0 := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with
| H => simp [← ofReal_inj, cosKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂_undef _ (by simpa : (I * ↑x).im ≤ 0)]
/-- For `a = 0`, both kernels agree. -/
lemma evenKernel_eq_cosKernel_of_zero : evenKernel 0 = cosKernel 0 := by
ext1 x
simp [← QuotientAddGroup.mk_zero, ← ofReal_inj, evenKernel_def, cosKernel_def]
@[simp]
lemma evenKernel_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) : evenKernel (-a) x = evenKernel a x := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with
| H => simp [← QuotientAddGroup.mk_neg, ← ofReal_inj, evenKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂_neg_left]
@[simp]
lemma cosKernel_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) : cosKernel (-a) x = cosKernel a x := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with
| H => simp [← QuotientAddGroup.mk_neg, ← ofReal_inj, cosKernel_def]
lemma continuousOn_evenKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) : ContinuousOn (evenKernel a) (Ioi 0) := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with | H a' =>
apply continuous_re.comp_continuousOn (f := fun x ↦ (evenKernel a' x : ℂ))
simp only [evenKernel_def]
refine continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt (fun x hx ↦ .mul (by fun_prop) ?_)
exact (continuousAt_jacobiTheta₂ (a' * I * x) <| by simpa).comp
(f := fun u : ℝ ↦ (a' * I * u, I * u)) (by fun_prop)
lemma continuousOn_cosKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) : ContinuousOn (cosKernel a) (Ioi 0) := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with | H a' =>
apply continuous_re.comp_continuousOn (f := fun x ↦ (cosKernel a' x : ℂ))
simp only [cosKernel_def]
refine continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt (fun x hx ↦ ?_)
exact (continuousAt_jacobiTheta₂ a' <| by simpa).comp
(f := fun u : ℝ ↦ ((a' : ℂ), I * u)) (by fun_prop)
| lemma evenKernel_functional_equation (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) :
evenKernel a x = 1 / x ^ (1 / 2 : ℝ) * cosKernel a (1 / x) := by
rcases le_or_lt x 0 with hx | hx
· rw [evenKernel_undef _ hx, cosKernel_undef, mul_zero]
exact div_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos zero_le_one hx
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with | H a =>
rw [← ofReal_inj, ofReal_mul, evenKernel_def, cosKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂_functional_equation]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LSeries/HurwitzZetaEven.lean | 128 | 134 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.GeomSum
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.CommRing
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Equiv
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.BigOperators
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Noetherian.Basic
/-!
# Ring-theoretic supplement of Algebra.Polynomial.
## Main results
* `MvPolynomial.isDomain`:
If a ring is an integral domain, then so is its polynomial ring over finitely many variables.
* `Polynomial.isNoetherianRing`:
Hilbert basis theorem, that if a ring is noetherian then so is its polynomial ring.
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Finset
universe u v w
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type*}
namespace Polynomial
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
instance instCharP (p : ℕ) [h : CharP R p] : CharP R[X] p :=
let ⟨h⟩ := h
⟨fun n => by rw [← map_natCast C, ← C_0, C_inj, h]⟩
instance instExpChar (p : ℕ) [h : ExpChar R p] : ExpChar R[X] p := by
cases h; exacts [ExpChar.zero, ExpChar.prime ‹_›]
variable (R)
/-- The `R`-submodule of `R[X]` consisting of polynomials of degree ≤ `n`. -/
def degreeLE (n : WithBot ℕ) : Submodule R R[X] :=
⨅ k : ℕ, ⨅ _ : ↑k > n, LinearMap.ker (lcoeff R k)
/-- The `R`-submodule of `R[X]` consisting of polynomials of degree < `n`. -/
def degreeLT (n : ℕ) : Submodule R R[X] :=
⨅ k : ℕ, ⨅ (_ : k ≥ n), LinearMap.ker (lcoeff R k)
variable {R}
theorem mem_degreeLE {n : WithBot ℕ} {f : R[X]} : f ∈ degreeLE R n ↔ degree f ≤ n := by
simp only [degreeLE, Submodule.mem_iInf, degree_le_iff_coeff_zero, LinearMap.mem_ker]; rfl
@[mono]
theorem degreeLE_mono {m n : WithBot ℕ} (H : m ≤ n) : degreeLE R m ≤ degreeLE R n := fun _ hf =>
mem_degreeLE.2 (le_trans (mem_degreeLE.1 hf) H)
theorem degreeLE_eq_span_X_pow [DecidableEq R] {n : ℕ} :
degreeLE R n = Submodule.span R ↑((Finset.range (n + 1)).image fun n => (X : R[X]) ^ n) := by
apply le_antisymm
· intro p hp
replace hp := mem_degreeLE.1 hp
rw [← Polynomial.sum_monomial_eq p, Polynomial.sum]
refine Submodule.sum_mem _ fun k hk => ?_
have := WithBot.coe_le_coe.1 (Finset.sup_le_iff.1 hp k hk)
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, C_mul']
refine
Submodule.smul_mem _ _
(Submodule.subset_span <|
Finset.mem_coe.2 <|
Finset.mem_image.2 ⟨_, Finset.mem_range.2 (Nat.lt_succ_of_le this), rfl⟩)
rw [Submodule.span_le, Finset.coe_image, Set.image_subset_iff]
intro k hk
apply mem_degreeLE.2
exact
(degree_X_pow_le _).trans (WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 <| Nat.le_of_lt_succ <| Finset.mem_range.1 hk)
theorem mem_degreeLT {n : ℕ} {f : R[X]} : f ∈ degreeLT R n ↔ degree f < n := by
rw [degreeLT, Submodule.mem_iInf]
conv_lhs => intro i; rw [Submodule.mem_iInf]
rw [degree, Finset.max_eq_sup_coe]
rw [Finset.sup_lt_iff ?_]
rotate_left
· apply WithBot.bot_lt_coe
conv_rhs =>
simp only [mem_support_iff]
intro b
rw [Nat.cast_withBot, WithBot.coe_lt_coe, lt_iff_not_le, Ne, not_imp_not]
rfl
@[mono]
theorem degreeLT_mono {m n : ℕ} (H : m ≤ n) : degreeLT R m ≤ degreeLT R n := fun _ hf =>
mem_degreeLT.2 (lt_of_lt_of_le (mem_degreeLT.1 hf) <| WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 H)
theorem degreeLT_eq_span_X_pow [DecidableEq R] {n : ℕ} :
degreeLT R n = Submodule.span R ↑((Finset.range n).image fun n => X ^ n : Finset R[X]) := by
apply le_antisymm
· intro p hp
replace hp := mem_degreeLT.1 hp
rw [← Polynomial.sum_monomial_eq p, Polynomial.sum]
refine Submodule.sum_mem _ fun k hk => ?_
have := WithBot.coe_lt_coe.1 ((Finset.sup_lt_iff <| WithBot.bot_lt_coe n).1 hp k hk)
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, C_mul']
refine
Submodule.smul_mem _ _
(Submodule.subset_span <|
Finset.mem_coe.2 <| Finset.mem_image.2 ⟨_, Finset.mem_range.2 this, rfl⟩)
rw [Submodule.span_le, Finset.coe_image, Set.image_subset_iff]
intro k hk
apply mem_degreeLT.2
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (degree_X_pow_le _) (WithBot.coe_lt_coe.2 <| Finset.mem_range.1 hk)
/-- The first `n` coefficients on `degreeLT n` form a linear equivalence with `Fin n → R`. -/
def degreeLTEquiv (R) [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : degreeLT R n ≃ₗ[R] Fin n → R where
toFun p n := (↑p : R[X]).coeff n
invFun f :=
⟨∑ i : Fin n, monomial i (f i),
(degreeLT R n).sum_mem fun i _ =>
mem_degreeLT.mpr
(lt_of_le_of_lt (degree_monomial_le i (f i)) (WithBot.coe_lt_coe.mpr i.is_lt))⟩
map_add' p q := by
ext
dsimp
rw [coeff_add]
map_smul' x p := by
ext
dsimp
rw [coeff_smul]
rfl
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨p, hp⟩
ext1
simp only [Submodule.coe_mk]
by_cases hp0 : p = 0
· subst hp0
simp only [coeff_zero, LinearMap.map_zero, Finset.sum_const_zero]
rw [mem_degreeLT, degree_eq_natDegree hp0, Nat.cast_lt] at hp
conv_rhs => rw [p.as_sum_range' n hp, ← Fin.sum_univ_eq_sum_range]
right_inv f := by
ext i
simp only [finset_sum_coeff, Submodule.coe_mk]
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single i, coeff_monomial, if_pos rfl]
· rintro j - hji
rw [coeff_monomial, if_neg]
rwa [← Fin.ext_iff]
· intro h
exact (h (Finset.mem_univ _)).elim
theorem degreeLTEquiv_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero {n : ℕ} {p : R[X]} (hp : p ∈ degreeLT R n) :
degreeLTEquiv _ _ ⟨p, hp⟩ = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by simp
theorem eval_eq_sum_degreeLTEquiv {n : ℕ} {p : R[X]} (hp : p ∈ degreeLT R n) (x : R) :
p.eval x = ∑ i, degreeLTEquiv _ _ ⟨p, hp⟩ i * x ^ (i : ℕ) := by
simp_rw [eval_eq_sum]
exact (sum_fin _ (by simp_rw [zero_mul, forall_const]) (mem_degreeLT.mp hp)).symm
theorem degreeLT_succ_eq_degreeLE {n : ℕ} : degreeLT R (n + 1) = degreeLE R n := by
ext x
by_cases x_zero : x = 0
· simp_rw [x_zero, Submodule.zero_mem]
· rw [mem_degreeLT, mem_degreeLE, ← natDegree_lt_iff_degree_lt (by rwa [ne_eq]),
← natDegree_le_iff_degree_le, Nat.lt_succ]
/-- The equivalence between monic polynomials of degree `n` and polynomials of degree less than
`n`, formed by adding a term `X ^ n`. -/
def monicEquivDegreeLT [Nontrivial R] (n : ℕ) :
{ p : R[X] // p.Monic ∧ p.natDegree = n } ≃ degreeLT R n where
toFun p := ⟨p.1.eraseLead, by
rcases p with ⟨p, hp, rfl⟩
simp only [mem_degreeLT]
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ degree_le_natDegree
exact degree_eraseLead_lt (ne_zero_of_ne_zero_of_monic one_ne_zero hp)⟩
invFun := fun p =>
⟨X^n + p.1, monic_X_pow_add (mem_degreeLT.1 p.2), by
rw [natDegree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt]
· simp
· simp [mem_degreeLT.1 p.2]⟩
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨p, hp, rfl⟩
ext1
simp only
conv_rhs => rw [← eraseLead_add_C_mul_X_pow p]
simp [Monic.def.1 hp, add_comm]
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨p, hp⟩
ext1
simp only
rw [eraseLead_add_of_degree_lt_left]
· simp
· simp [mem_degreeLT.1 hp]
/-- For every polynomial `p` in the span of a set `s : Set R[X]`, there exists a polynomial of
`p' ∈ s` with higher degree. See also `Polynomial.exists_degree_le_of_mem_span_of_finite`. -/
theorem exists_degree_le_of_mem_span {s : Set R[X]} {p : R[X]}
(hs : s.Nonempty) (hp : p ∈ Submodule.span R s) :
∃ p' ∈ s, degree p ≤ degree p' := by
by_contra! h
by_cases hp_zero : p = 0
· rw [hp_zero, degree_zero] at h
rcases hs with ⟨x, hx⟩
exact not_lt_bot (h x hx)
· have : p ∈ degreeLT R (natDegree p) := by
refine (Submodule.span_le.mpr fun p' p'_mem => ?_) hp
rw [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_degreeLT, Nat.cast_withBot]
exact lt_of_lt_of_le (h p' p'_mem) degree_le_natDegree
rwa [mem_degreeLT, Nat.cast_withBot, degree_eq_natDegree hp_zero,
Nat.cast_withBot, lt_self_iff_false] at this
/-- A stronger version of `Polynomial.exists_degree_le_of_mem_span` under the assumption that the
set `s : R[X]` is finite. There exists a polynomial `p' ∈ s` whose degree dominates the degree of
every element of `p ∈ span R s`. -/
theorem exists_degree_le_of_mem_span_of_finite {s : Set R[X]} (s_fin : s.Finite) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
∃ p' ∈ s, ∀ (p : R[X]), p ∈ Submodule.span R s → degree p ≤ degree p' := by
rcases Set.Finite.exists_maximal_wrt degree s s_fin hs with ⟨a, has, hmax⟩
refine ⟨a, has, fun p hp => ?_⟩
rcases exists_degree_le_of_mem_span hs hp with ⟨p', hp'⟩
by_cases h : degree a ≤ degree p'
· rw [← hmax p' hp'.left h] at hp'; exact hp'.right
· exact le_trans hp'.right (not_le.mp h).le
/-- The span of every finite set of polynomials is contained in a `degreeLE n` for some `n`. -/
theorem span_le_degreeLE_of_finite {s : Set R[X]} (s_fin : s.Finite) :
∃ n : ℕ, Submodule.span R s ≤ degreeLE R n := by
by_cases s_emp : s.Nonempty
· rcases exists_degree_le_of_mem_span_of_finite s_fin s_emp with ⟨p', _, hp'max⟩
exact ⟨natDegree p', fun p hp => mem_degreeLE.mpr ((hp'max _ hp).trans degree_le_natDegree)⟩
· rw [Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty] at s_emp
rw [s_emp, Submodule.span_empty]
exact ⟨0, bot_le⟩
/-- The span of every finite set of polynomials is contained in a `degreeLT n` for some `n`. -/
theorem span_of_finite_le_degreeLT {s : Set R[X]} (s_fin : s.Finite) :
∃ n : ℕ, Submodule.span R s ≤ degreeLT R n := by
rcases span_le_degreeLE_of_finite s_fin with ⟨n, _⟩
exact ⟨n + 1, by rwa [degreeLT_succ_eq_degreeLE]⟩
/-- If `R` is a nontrivial ring, the polynomials `R[X]` are not finite as an `R`-module. When `R` is
a field, this is equivalent to `R[X]` being an infinite-dimensional vector space over `R`. -/
theorem not_finite [Nontrivial R] : ¬ Module.Finite R R[X] := by
rw [Module.finite_def, Submodule.fg_def]
push_neg
intro s hs contra
rcases span_le_degreeLE_of_finite hs with ⟨n,hn⟩
have : ((X : R[X]) ^ (n + 1)) ∈ Polynomial.degreeLE R ↑n := by
rw [contra] at hn
exact hn Submodule.mem_top
rw [mem_degreeLE, degree_X_pow, Nat.cast_le, add_le_iff_nonpos_right, nonpos_iff_eq_zero] at this
exact one_ne_zero this
theorem geom_sum_X_comp_X_add_one_eq_sum (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, (X : R[X]) ^ i).comp (X + 1) =
(Finset.range n).sum fun i : ℕ => (n.choose (i + 1) : R[X]) * X ^ i := by
ext i
trans (n.choose (i + 1) : R); swap
· simp only [finset_sum_coeff, ← C_eq_natCast, coeff_C_mul_X_pow]
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single i, if_pos rfl]
· simp +contextual only [@eq_comm _ i, if_false, eq_self_iff_true,
imp_true_iff]
· simp +contextual only [Nat.lt_add_one_iff, Nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt,
Nat.cast_zero, Finset.mem_range, not_lt, eq_self_iff_true, if_true, imp_true_iff]
induction' n with n ih generalizing i
· dsimp; simp only [zero_comp, coeff_zero, Nat.cast_zero]
· simp only [geom_sum_succ', ih, add_comp, X_pow_comp, coeff_add, Nat.choose_succ_succ,
Nat.cast_add, coeff_X_add_one_pow]
theorem Monic.geom_sum {P : R[X]} (hP : P.Monic) (hdeg : 0 < P.natDegree) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, P ^ i).Monic := by
nontriviality R
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hn
rw [geom_sum_succ']
refine (hP.pow _).add_of_left ?_
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (degree_sum_le _ _) ?_
rw [Finset.sup_lt_iff]
· simp only [Finset.mem_range, degree_eq_natDegree (hP.pow _).ne_zero]
simp only [Nat.cast_lt, hP.natDegree_pow]
intro k
exact nsmul_lt_nsmul_left hdeg
· rw [bot_lt_iff_ne_bot, Ne, degree_eq_bot]
exact (hP.pow _).ne_zero
theorem Monic.geom_sum' {P : R[X]} (hP : P.Monic) (hdeg : 0 < P.degree) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, P ^ i).Monic :=
hP.geom_sum (natDegree_pos_iff_degree_pos.2 hdeg) hn
theorem monic_geom_sum_X {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : (∑ i ∈ range n, (X : R[X]) ^ i).Monic := by
nontriviality R
apply monic_X.geom_sum _ hn
simp only [natDegree_X, zero_lt_one]
end Semiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R]
/-- Given a polynomial, return the polynomial whose coefficients are in
the ring closure of the original coefficients. -/
def restriction (p : R[X]) : Polynomial (Subring.closure (↑p.coeffs : Set R)) :=
∑ i ∈ p.support,
monomial i
(⟨p.coeff i,
letI := Classical.decEq R
if H : p.coeff i = 0 then H.symm ▸ (Subring.closure _).zero_mem
else Subring.subset_closure (p.coeff_mem_coeffs _ H)⟩ :
Subring.closure (↑p.coeffs : Set R))
@[simp]
theorem coeff_restriction {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} : ↑(coeff (restriction p) n) = coeff p n := by
classical
simp only [restriction, coeff_monomial, finset_sum_coeff, mem_support_iff, Finset.sum_ite_eq',
Ne, ite_not]
split_ifs with h
· rw [h]
rfl
· rfl
theorem coeff_restriction' {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} : (coeff (restriction p) n).1 = coeff p n := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem support_restriction (p : R[X]) : support (restriction p) = support p := by
ext i
simp only [mem_support_iff, not_iff_not, Ne]
conv_rhs => rw [← coeff_restriction]
exact ⟨fun H => by rw [H, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero], fun H => Subtype.coe_injective H⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_restriction {R : Type u} [CommRing R] (p : R[X]) :
p.restriction.map (algebraMap _ _) = p :=
ext fun n => by rw [coeff_map, Algebra.algebraMap_ofSubring_apply, coeff_restriction]
@[simp]
theorem degree_restriction {p : R[X]} : (restriction p).degree = p.degree := by simp [degree]
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_restriction {p : R[X]} : (restriction p).natDegree = p.natDegree := by
simp [natDegree]
@[simp]
theorem monic_restriction {p : R[X]} : Monic (restriction p) ↔ Monic p := by
simp only [Monic, leadingCoeff, natDegree_restriction]
rw [← @coeff_restriction _ _ p]
exact ⟨fun H => by rw [H, OneMemClass.coe_one], fun H => Subtype.coe_injective H⟩
@[simp]
theorem restriction_zero : restriction (0 : R[X]) = 0 := by
simp only [restriction, Finset.sum_empty, support_zero]
@[simp]
theorem restriction_one : restriction (1 : R[X]) = 1 :=
ext fun i => Subtype.eq <| by rw [coeff_restriction', coeff_one, coeff_one]; split_ifs <;> rfl
variable [Semiring S] {f : R →+* S} {x : S}
theorem eval₂_restriction {p : R[X]} :
eval₂ f x p =
eval₂ (f.comp (Subring.subtype (Subring.closure (p.coeffs : Set R)))) x p.restriction := by
simp only [eval₂_eq_sum, sum, support_restriction, ← @coeff_restriction _ _ p, RingHom.comp_apply,
Subring.coe_subtype]
section ToSubring
variable (p : R[X]) (T : Subring R)
/-- Given a polynomial `p` and a subring `T` that contains the coefficients of `p`,
return the corresponding polynomial whose coefficients are in `T`. -/
def toSubring (hp : (↑p.coeffs : Set R) ⊆ T) : T[X] :=
∑ i ∈ p.support,
monomial i
(⟨p.coeff i,
letI := Classical.decEq R
if H : p.coeff i = 0 then H.symm ▸ T.zero_mem else hp (p.coeff_mem_coeffs _ H)⟩ : T)
variable (hp : (↑p.coeffs : Set R) ⊆ T)
@[simp]
theorem coeff_toSubring {n : ℕ} : ↑(coeff (toSubring p T hp) n) = coeff p n := by
classical
simp only [toSubring, coeff_monomial, finset_sum_coeff, mem_support_iff, Finset.sum_ite_eq',
Ne, ite_not]
split_ifs with h
· rw [h]
rfl
· rfl
theorem coeff_toSubring' {n : ℕ} : (coeff (toSubring p T hp) n).1 = coeff p n := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem support_toSubring : support (toSubring p T hp) = support p := by
ext i
simp only [mem_support_iff, not_iff_not, Ne]
conv_rhs => rw [← coeff_toSubring p T hp]
exact ⟨fun H => by rw [H, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero], fun H => Subtype.coe_injective H⟩
@[simp]
theorem degree_toSubring : (toSubring p T hp).degree = p.degree := by simp [degree]
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_toSubring : (toSubring p T hp).natDegree = p.natDegree := by simp [natDegree]
@[simp]
theorem monic_toSubring : Monic (toSubring p T hp) ↔ Monic p := by
simp_rw [Monic, leadingCoeff, natDegree_toSubring, ← coeff_toSubring p T hp]
exact ⟨fun H => by rw [H, OneMemClass.coe_one], fun H => Subtype.coe_injective H⟩
@[simp]
theorem toSubring_zero : toSubring (0 : R[X]) T (by simp [coeffs]) = 0 := by
ext i
simp
@[simp]
theorem toSubring_one :
toSubring (1 : R[X]) T
(Set.Subset.trans coeffs_one <| Finset.singleton_subset_set_iff.2 T.one_mem) =
1 :=
ext fun i => Subtype.eq <| by
rw [coeff_toSubring', coeff_one, coeff_one, apply_ite Subtype.val, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero,
OneMemClass.coe_one]
@[simp]
theorem map_toSubring : (p.toSubring T hp).map (Subring.subtype T) = p := by
ext n
simp [coeff_map]
end ToSubring
variable (T : Subring R)
/-- Given a polynomial whose coefficients are in some subring, return
the corresponding polynomial whose coefficients are in the ambient ring. -/
def ofSubring (p : T[X]) : R[X] :=
∑ i ∈ p.support, monomial i (p.coeff i : R)
theorem coeff_ofSubring (p : T[X]) (n : ℕ) : coeff (ofSubring T p) n = (coeff p n : T) := by
simp only [ofSubring, coeff_monomial, finset_sum_coeff, mem_support_iff, Finset.sum_ite_eq',
ite_eq_right_iff, Ne, ite_not, Classical.not_not, ite_eq_left_iff]
intro h
rw [h, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero]
@[simp]
theorem coeffs_ofSubring {p : T[X]} : (↑(p.ofSubring T).coeffs : Set R) ⊆ T := by
classical
intro i hi
simp only [coeffs, Set.mem_image, mem_support_iff, Ne, Finset.mem_coe,
(Finset.coe_image)] at hi
rcases hi with ⟨n, _, h'n⟩
rw [← h'n, coeff_ofSubring]
exact Subtype.mem (coeff p n : T)
end Ring
end Polynomial
namespace Ideal
open Polynomial
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
/-- Transport an ideal of `R[X]` to an `R`-submodule of `R[X]`. -/
def ofPolynomial (I : Ideal R[X]) : Submodule R R[X] where
carrier := I.carrier
zero_mem' := I.zero_mem
add_mem' := I.add_mem
smul_mem' c x H := by
rw [← C_mul']
exact I.mul_mem_left _ H
variable {I : Ideal R[X]}
theorem mem_ofPolynomial (x) : x ∈ I.ofPolynomial ↔ x ∈ I :=
Iff.rfl
variable (I)
/-- Given an ideal `I` of `R[X]`, make the `R`-submodule of `I`
consisting of polynomials of degree ≤ `n`. -/
def degreeLE (n : WithBot ℕ) : Submodule R R[X] :=
Polynomial.degreeLE R n ⊓ I.ofPolynomial
/-- Given an ideal `I` of `R[X]`, make the ideal in `R` of
leading coefficients of polynomials in `I` with degree ≤ `n`. -/
def leadingCoeffNth (n : ℕ) : Ideal R :=
(I.degreeLE n).map <| lcoeff R n
/-- Given an ideal `I` in `R[X]`, make the ideal in `R` of the
leading coefficients in `I`. -/
def leadingCoeff : Ideal R :=
⨆ n : ℕ, I.leadingCoeffNth n
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring S]
/-- If every coefficient of a polynomial is in an ideal `I`, then so is the polynomial itself -/
theorem polynomial_mem_ideal_of_coeff_mem_ideal (I : Ideal R[X]) (p : R[X])
(hp : ∀ n : ℕ, p.coeff n ∈ I.comap (C : R →+* R[X])) : p ∈ I :=
sum_C_mul_X_pow_eq p ▸ Submodule.sum_mem I fun n _ => I.mul_mem_right _ (hp n)
/-- The push-forward of an ideal `I` of `R` to `R[X]` via inclusion
is exactly the set of polynomials whose coefficients are in `I` -/
theorem mem_map_C_iff {I : Ideal R} {f : R[X]} :
f ∈ (Ideal.map (C : R →+* R[X]) I : Ideal R[X]) ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, f.coeff n ∈ I := by
constructor
· intro hf
refine Submodule.span_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ hf
· intro f hf n
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := (Set.mem_image _ _ _).mp hf
rw [← hx.right, coeff_C]
by_cases h : n = 0
· simpa [h] using hx.left
· simp [h]
· simp
· exact fun f g _ _ hf hg n => by simp [I.add_mem (hf n) (hg n)]
· refine fun f g _ hg n => ?_
rw [smul_eq_mul, coeff_mul]
exact I.sum_mem fun c _ => I.mul_mem_left (f.coeff c.fst) (hg c.snd)
· intro hf
rw [← sum_monomial_eq f]
refine (I.map C : Ideal R[X]).sum_mem fun n _ => ?_
simp only [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, ne_eq]
rw [mul_comm]
exact (I.map C : Ideal R[X]).mul_mem_left _ (mem_map_of_mem _ (hf n))
theorem _root_.Polynomial.ker_mapRingHom (f : R →+* S) :
RingHom.ker (Polynomial.mapRingHom f) = (RingHom.ker f).map (C : R →+* R[X]) := by
ext
simp only [RingHom.mem_ker, coe_mapRingHom]
rw [mem_map_C_iff, Polynomial.ext_iff]
simp [RingHom.mem_ker]
variable (I : Ideal R[X])
theorem mem_leadingCoeffNth (n : ℕ) (x) :
x ∈ I.leadingCoeffNth n ↔ ∃ p ∈ I, degree p ≤ n ∧ p.leadingCoeff = x := by
simp only [leadingCoeffNth, degreeLE, Submodule.mem_map, lcoeff_apply, Submodule.mem_inf,
mem_degreeLE]
constructor
· rintro ⟨p, ⟨hpdeg, hpI⟩, rfl⟩
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hpdeg with hpdeg | hpdeg
· refine ⟨0, I.zero_mem, bot_le, ?_⟩
rw [leadingCoeff_zero, eq_comm]
exact coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt hpdeg
· refine ⟨p, hpI, le_of_eq hpdeg, ?_⟩
rw [Polynomial.leadingCoeff, natDegree, hpdeg, Nat.cast_withBot, WithBot.unbotD_coe]
· rintro ⟨p, hpI, hpdeg, rfl⟩
have : natDegree p + (n - natDegree p) = n :=
add_tsub_cancel_of_le (natDegree_le_of_degree_le hpdeg)
refine ⟨p * X ^ (n - natDegree p), ⟨?_, I.mul_mem_right _ hpI⟩, ?_⟩
· apply le_trans (degree_mul_le _ _) _
apply le_trans (add_le_add degree_le_natDegree (degree_X_pow_le _)) _
rw [← Nat.cast_add, this]
· rw [Polynomial.leadingCoeff, ← coeff_mul_X_pow p (n - natDegree p), this]
theorem mem_leadingCoeffNth_zero (x) : x ∈ I.leadingCoeffNth 0 ↔ C x ∈ I :=
(mem_leadingCoeffNth _ _ _).trans
⟨fun ⟨p, hpI, hpdeg, hpx⟩ => by
rwa [← hpx, Polynomial.leadingCoeff,
Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero (natDegree_le_of_degree_le hpdeg), ← eq_C_of_degree_le_zero hpdeg],
fun hx => ⟨C x, hx, degree_C_le, leadingCoeff_C x⟩⟩
theorem leadingCoeffNth_mono {m n : ℕ} (H : m ≤ n) : I.leadingCoeffNth m ≤ I.leadingCoeffNth n := by
intro r hr
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_leadingCoeffNth] at hr ⊢
rcases hr with ⟨p, hpI, hpdeg, rfl⟩
refine ⟨p * X ^ (n - m), I.mul_mem_right _ hpI, ?_, leadingCoeff_mul_X_pow⟩
refine le_trans (degree_mul_le _ _) ?_
refine le_trans (add_le_add hpdeg (degree_X_pow_le _)) ?_
rw [← Nat.cast_add, add_tsub_cancel_of_le H]
theorem mem_leadingCoeff (x) : x ∈ I.leadingCoeff ↔ ∃ p ∈ I, Polynomial.leadingCoeff p = x := by
rw [leadingCoeff, Submodule.mem_iSup_of_directed]
· simp only [mem_leadingCoeffNth]
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, p, hpI, _, rfl⟩
exact ⟨p, hpI, rfl⟩
rintro ⟨p, hpI, rfl⟩
exact ⟨natDegree p, p, hpI, degree_le_natDegree, rfl⟩
intro i j
exact
⟨i + j, I.leadingCoeffNth_mono (Nat.le_add_right _ _),
I.leadingCoeffNth_mono (Nat.le_add_left _ _)⟩
/-- If `I` is an ideal, and `pᵢ` is a finite family of polynomials each satisfying
`∀ k, (pᵢ)ₖ ∈ Iⁿⁱ⁻ᵏ` for some `nᵢ`, then `p = ∏ pᵢ` also satisfies `∀ k, pₖ ∈ Iⁿ⁻ᵏ` with `n = ∑ nᵢ`.
-/
theorem _root_.Polynomial.coeff_prod_mem_ideal_pow_tsub {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[X])
(I : Ideal R) (n : ι → ℕ) (h : ∀ i ∈ s, ∀ (k), (f i).coeff k ∈ I ^ (n i - k)) (k : ℕ) :
(s.prod f).coeff k ∈ I ^ (s.sum n - k) := by
classical
induction' s using Finset.induction with a s ha hs generalizing k
· rw [sum_empty, prod_empty, coeff_one, zero_tsub, pow_zero, Ideal.one_eq_top]
exact Submodule.mem_top
· rw [sum_insert ha, prod_insert ha, coeff_mul]
apply sum_mem
rintro ⟨i, j⟩ e
obtain rfl : i + j = k := mem_antidiagonal.mp e
apply Ideal.pow_le_pow_right add_tsub_add_le_tsub_add_tsub
rw [pow_add]
exact
Ideal.mul_mem_mul (h _ (Finset.mem_insert.mpr <| Or.inl rfl) _)
(hs (fun i hi k => h _ (Finset.mem_insert.mpr <| Or.inr hi) _) j)
end CommSemiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R]
/-- `R[X]` is never a field for any ring `R`. -/
theorem polynomial_not_isField : ¬IsField R[X] := by
nontriviality R
intro hR
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := hR.mul_inv_cancel X_ne_zero
have hp0 : p ≠ 0 := right_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one hp
have := degree_lt_degree_mul_X hp0
rw [← X_mul, congr_arg degree hp, degree_one, Nat.WithBot.lt_zero_iff, degree_eq_bot] at this
exact hp0 this
/-- The only constant in a maximal ideal over a field is `0`. -/
theorem eq_zero_of_constant_mem_of_maximal (hR : IsField R) (I : Ideal R[X]) [hI : I.IsMaximal]
(x : R) (hx : C x ∈ I) : x = 0 := by
refine Classical.by_contradiction fun hx0 => hI.ne_top ((eq_top_iff_one I).2 ?_)
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hR.mul_inv_cancel hx0
convert I.mul_mem_left (C y) hx
rw [← C.map_mul, hR.mul_comm y x, hy, RingHom.map_one]
end Ring
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R]
/-- If `P` is a prime ideal of `R`, then `P.R[x]` is a prime ideal of `R[x]`. -/
theorem isPrime_map_C_iff_isPrime (P : Ideal R) :
IsPrime (map (C : R →+* R[X]) P : Ideal R[X]) ↔ IsPrime P := by
-- Note: the following proof avoids quotient rings
-- It can be golfed substantially by using something like
-- `(Quotient.isDomain_iff_prime (map C P : Ideal R[X]))`
constructor
· intro H
have := comap_isPrime C (map C P)
convert this using 1
ext x
simp only [mem_comap, mem_map_C_iff]
constructor
· rintro h (- | n)
· rwa [coeff_C_zero]
· simp only [coeff_C_ne_zero (Nat.succ_ne_zero _), Submodule.zero_mem]
· intro h
simpa only [coeff_C_zero] using h 0
· intro h
constructor
· rw [Ne, eq_top_iff_one, mem_map_C_iff, not_forall]
use 0
rw [coeff_one_zero, ← eq_top_iff_one]
exact h.1
· intro f g
simp only [mem_map_C_iff]
contrapose!
rintro ⟨hf, hg⟩
classical
let m := Nat.find hf
let n := Nat.find hg
refine ⟨m + n, ?_⟩
rw [coeff_mul, ← Finset.insert_erase ((Finset.mem_antidiagonal (a := (m,n))).mpr rfl),
Finset.sum_insert (Finset.not_mem_erase _ _), (P.add_mem_iff_left _).not]
· apply mt h.2
rw [not_or]
exact ⟨Nat.find_spec hf, Nat.find_spec hg⟩
apply P.sum_mem
rintro ⟨i, j⟩ hij
rw [Finset.mem_erase, Finset.mem_antidiagonal] at hij
simp only [Ne, Prod.mk_inj, not_and_or] at hij
obtain hi | hj : i < m ∨ j < n := by
omega
· rw [mul_comm]
apply P.mul_mem_left
exact Classical.not_not.1 (Nat.find_min hf hi)
· apply P.mul_mem_left
exact Classical.not_not.1 (Nat.find_min hg hj)
/-- If `P` is a prime ideal of `R`, then `P.R[x]` is a prime ideal of `R[x]`. -/
theorem isPrime_map_C_of_isPrime {P : Ideal R} (H : IsPrime P) :
IsPrime (map (C : R →+* R[X]) P : Ideal R[X]) :=
(isPrime_map_C_iff_isPrime P).mpr H
| theorem is_fg_degreeLE [IsNoetherianRing R] (I : Ideal R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
Submodule.FG (I.degreeLE n) :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
isNoetherian_submodule_left.1
(isNoetherian_of_fg_of_noetherian _ ⟨_, degreeLE_eq_span_X_pow.symm⟩) _
end CommRing
end Ideal
section Ideal
open Submodule Set
variable [Semiring R] {f : R[X]} {I : Ideal R[X]}
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Basic.lean | 700 | 715 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Expect
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Canonical
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Nonneg.Floor
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Data.NNReal.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Group
/-!
# Basic results on nonnegative real numbers
This file contains all results on `NNReal` that do not directly follow from its basic structure.
As a consequence, it is a bit of a random collection of results, and is a good target for cleanup.
## Notations
This file uses `ℝ≥0` as a localized notation for `NNReal`.
-/
assert_not_exists Star
open Function
open scoped BigOperators
namespace NNReal
noncomputable instance : FloorSemiring ℝ≥0 := Nonneg.floorSemiring
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_indicator {α} (s : Set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0) (a : α) :
((s.indicator f a : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = s.indicator (fun x => ↑(f x)) a :=
(toRealHom : ℝ≥0 →+ ℝ).map_indicator _ _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_list_sum (l : List ℝ≥0) : ((l.sum : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (l.map (↑)).sum :=
map_list_sum toRealHom l
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_list_prod (l : List ℝ≥0) : ((l.prod : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (l.map (↑)).prod :=
map_list_prod toRealHom l
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_multiset_sum (s : Multiset ℝ≥0) : ((s.sum : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (s.map (↑)).sum :=
map_multiset_sum toRealHom s
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_multiset_prod (s : Multiset ℝ≥0) : ((s.prod : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (s.map (↑)).prod :=
map_multiset_prod toRealHom s
variable {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → ℝ}
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sum (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) : ∑ i ∈ s, f i = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i : ℝ) :=
map_sum toRealHom _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma coe_expect (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) : 𝔼 i ∈ s, f i = 𝔼 i ∈ s, (f i : ℝ) :=
map_expect toRealHom ..
theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_sum_of_nonneg (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ f i) :
Real.toNNReal (∑ a ∈ s, f a) = ∑ a ∈ s, Real.toNNReal (f a) := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_sum, Real.coe_toNNReal _ (Finset.sum_nonneg hf)]
exact Finset.sum_congr rfl fun x hxs => by rw [Real.coe_toNNReal _ (hf x hxs)]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_prod (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) : ↑(∏ a ∈ s, f a) = ∏ a ∈ s, (f a : ℝ) :=
map_prod toRealHom _ _
theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_prod_of_nonneg (hf : ∀ a, a ∈ s → 0 ≤ f a) :
Real.toNNReal (∏ a ∈ s, f a) = ∏ a ∈ s, Real.toNNReal (f a) := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_prod, Real.coe_toNNReal _ (Finset.prod_nonneg hf)]
exact Finset.prod_congr rfl fun x hxs => by rw [Real.coe_toNNReal _ (hf x hxs)]
theorem le_iInf_add_iInf {ι ι' : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] [Nonempty ι'] {f : ι → ℝ≥0} {g : ι' → ℝ≥0}
{a : ℝ≥0} (h : ∀ i j, a ≤ f i + g j) : a ≤ (⨅ i, f i) + ⨅ j, g j := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.coe_add, coe_iInf, coe_iInf]
exact le_ciInf_add_ciInf h
theorem mul_finset_sup {α} (r : ℝ≥0) (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ≥0) :
r * s.sup f = s.sup fun a => r * f a :=
Finset.comp_sup_eq_sup_comp _ (NNReal.mul_sup r) (mul_zero r)
theorem finset_sup_mul {α} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ≥0) :
s.sup f * r = s.sup fun a => f a * r :=
Finset.comp_sup_eq_sup_comp (· * r) (fun x y => NNReal.sup_mul x y r) (zero_mul r)
theorem finset_sup_div {α} {f : α → ℝ≥0} {s : Finset α} (r : ℝ≥0) :
s.sup f / r = s.sup fun a => f a / r := by simp only [div_eq_inv_mul, mul_finset_sup]
open Real
section Sub
/-!
### Lemmas about subtraction
In this section we provide a few lemmas about subtraction that do not fit well into any other
typeclass. For lemmas about subtraction and addition see lemmas about `OrderedSub` in the file
`Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Sub.Basic`. See also `mul_tsub` and `tsub_mul`.
-/
theorem sub_div (a b c : ℝ≥0) : (a - b) / c = a / c - b / c :=
tsub_div _ _ _
end Sub
section Csupr
open Set
variable {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → ℝ≥0}
theorem iInf_mul (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : iInf f * a = ⨅ i, f i * a := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_mul, coe_iInf, coe_iInf]
exact Real.iInf_mul_of_nonneg (NNReal.coe_nonneg _) _
theorem mul_iInf (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : a * iInf f = ⨅ i, a * f i := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using iInf_mul f a
theorem mul_iSup (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : (a * ⨆ i, f i) = ⨆ i, a * f i := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_mul, NNReal.coe_iSup, NNReal.coe_iSup]
exact Real.mul_iSup_of_nonneg (NNReal.coe_nonneg _) _
theorem iSup_mul (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : (⨆ i, f i) * a = ⨆ i, f i * a := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_iSup]
simp_rw [mul_comm]
theorem iSup_div (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : (⨆ i, f i) / a = ⨆ i, f i / a := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, iSup_mul]
theorem mul_iSup_le {a : ℝ≥0} {g : ℝ≥0} {h : ι → ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ j, g * h j ≤ a) : g * iSup h ≤ a := by
rw [mul_iSup]
exact ciSup_le' H
theorem iSup_mul_le {a : ℝ≥0} {g : ι → ℝ≥0} {h : ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ i, g i * h ≤ a) : iSup g * h ≤ a := by
rw [iSup_mul]
exact ciSup_le' H
theorem iSup_mul_iSup_le {a : ℝ≥0} {g h : ι → ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ i j, g i * h j ≤ a) :
iSup g * iSup h ≤ a :=
iSup_mul_le fun _ => mul_iSup_le <| H _
variable [Nonempty ι]
theorem le_mul_iInf {a : ℝ≥0} {g : ℝ≥0} {h : ι → ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ j, a ≤ g * h j) : a ≤ g * iInf h := by
rw [mul_iInf]
exact le_ciInf H
theorem le_iInf_mul {a : ℝ≥0} {g : ι → ℝ≥0} {h : ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ i, a ≤ g i * h) : a ≤ iInf g * h := by
rw [iInf_mul]
exact le_ciInf H
theorem le_iInf_mul_iInf {a : ℝ≥0} {g h : ι → ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ i j, a ≤ g i * h j) :
a ≤ iInf g * iInf h :=
le_iInf_mul fun i => le_mul_iInf <| H i
end Csupr
end NNReal
| Mathlib/Data/NNReal/Basic.lean | 918 | 919 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Pointwise.Interval
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.BilinearMap
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Pi
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Prod
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
import Mathlib.Algebra.AddTorsor.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Defs
/-!
# Affine maps
This file defines affine maps.
## Main definitions
* `AffineMap` is the type of affine maps between two affine spaces with the same ring `k`. Various
basic examples of affine maps are defined, including `const`, `id`, `lineMap` and `homothety`.
## Notations
* `P1 →ᵃ[k] P2` is a notation for `AffineMap k P1 P2`;
* `AffineSpace V P`: a localized notation for `AddTorsor V P` defined in
`LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Basic`.
## Implementation notes
`outParam` is used in the definition of `[AddTorsor V P]` to make `V` an implicit argument
(deduced from `P`) in most cases. As for modules, `k` is an explicit argument rather than implied by
`P` or `V`.
This file only provides purely algebraic definitions and results. Those depending on analysis or
topology are defined elsewhere; see `Analysis.Normed.Affine.AddTorsor` and
`Topology.Algebra.Affine`.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affine_space
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principal_homogeneous_space
-/
open Affine
/-- An `AffineMap k P1 P2` (notation: `P1 →ᵃ[k] P2`) is a map from `P1` to `P2` that
induces a corresponding linear map from `V1` to `V2`. -/
structure AffineMap (k : Type*) {V1 : Type*} (P1 : Type*) {V2 : Type*} (P2 : Type*) [Ring k]
[AddCommGroup V1] [Module k V1] [AffineSpace V1 P1] [AddCommGroup V2] [Module k V2]
[AffineSpace V2 P2] where
toFun : P1 → P2
linear : V1 →ₗ[k] V2
map_vadd' : ∀ (p : P1) (v : V1), toFun (v +ᵥ p) = linear v +ᵥ toFun p
/-- An `AffineMap k P1 P2` (notation: `P1 →ᵃ[k] P2`) is a map from `P1` to `P2` that
induces a corresponding linear map from `V1` to `V2`. -/
notation:25 P1 " →ᵃ[" k:25 "] " P2:0 => AffineMap k P1 P2
instance AffineMap.instFunLike (k : Type*) {V1 : Type*} (P1 : Type*) {V2 : Type*} (P2 : Type*)
[Ring k] [AddCommGroup V1] [Module k V1] [AffineSpace V1 P1] [AddCommGroup V2] [Module k V2]
[AffineSpace V2 P2] : FunLike (P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) P1 P2 where
coe := AffineMap.toFun
coe_injective' := fun ⟨f, f_linear, f_add⟩ ⟨g, g_linear, g_add⟩ => fun (h : f = g) => by
obtain ⟨p⟩ := (AddTorsor.nonempty : Nonempty P1)
congr with v
apply vadd_right_cancel (f p)
rw [← f_add, h, ← g_add]
namespace LinearMap
variable {k : Type*} {V₁ : Type*} {V₂ : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V₁] [Module k V₁]
[AddCommGroup V₂] [Module k V₂] (f : V₁ →ₗ[k] V₂)
/-- Reinterpret a linear map as an affine map. -/
def toAffineMap : V₁ →ᵃ[k] V₂ where
toFun := f
linear := f
map_vadd' p v := f.map_add v p
@[simp]
theorem coe_toAffineMap : ⇑f.toAffineMap = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toAffineMap_linear : f.toAffineMap.linear = f :=
rfl
end LinearMap
namespace AffineMap
variable {k : Type*} {V1 : Type*} {P1 : Type*} {V2 : Type*} {P2 : Type*} {V3 : Type*}
{P3 : Type*} {V4 : Type*} {P4 : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V1] [Module k V1]
[AffineSpace V1 P1] [AddCommGroup V2] [Module k V2] [AffineSpace V2 P2] [AddCommGroup V3]
[Module k V3] [AffineSpace V3 P3] [AddCommGroup V4] [Module k V4] [AffineSpace V4 P4]
/-- Constructing an affine map and coercing back to a function
produces the same map. -/
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk (f : P1 → P2) (linear add) : ((mk f linear add : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) : P1 → P2) = f :=
rfl
/-- `toFun` is the same as the result of coercing to a function. -/
@[simp]
theorem toFun_eq_coe (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) : f.toFun = ⇑f :=
rfl
/-- An affine map on the result of adding a vector to a point produces
the same result as the linear map applied to that vector, added to the
affine map applied to that point. -/
@[simp]
theorem map_vadd (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) (p : P1) (v : V1) : f (v +ᵥ p) = f.linear v +ᵥ f p :=
f.map_vadd' p v
/-- The linear map on the result of subtracting two points is the
result of subtracting the result of the affine map on those two
points. -/
@[simp]
theorem linearMap_vsub (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) (p1 p2 : P1) : f.linear (p1 -ᵥ p2) = f p1 -ᵥ f p2 := by
conv_rhs => rw [← vsub_vadd p1 p2, map_vadd, vadd_vsub]
/-- Two affine maps are equal if they coerce to the same function. -/
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2} (h : ∀ p, f p = g p) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
theorem coeFn_injective : @Function.Injective (P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) (P1 → P2) (⇑) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective
protected theorem congr_arg (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) {x y : P1} (h : x = y) : f x = f y :=
congr_arg _ h
protected theorem congr_fun {f g : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2} (h : f = g) (x : P1) : f x = g x :=
h ▸ rfl
/-- Two affine maps are equal if they have equal linear maps and are equal at some point. -/
theorem ext_linear {f g : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2} (h₁ : f.linear = g.linear) {p : P1} (h₂ : f p = g p) :
f = g := by
ext q
have hgl : g.linear (q -ᵥ p) = toFun g ((q -ᵥ p) +ᵥ q) -ᵥ toFun g q := by simp
have := f.map_vadd' q (q -ᵥ p)
rw [h₁, hgl, toFun_eq_coe, map_vadd, linearMap_vsub, h₂] at this
simpa
/-- Two affine maps are equal if they have equal linear maps and are equal at some point. -/
theorem ext_linear_iff {f g : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2} : f = g ↔ (f.linear = g.linear) ∧ (∃ p, f p = g p) :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨congrArg _ h, by inhabit P1; exact default, by rw [h]⟩,
fun h ↦ Exists.casesOn h.2 fun _ hp ↦ ext_linear h.1 hp⟩
variable (k P1)
/-- The constant function as an `AffineMap`. -/
def const (p : P2) : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2 where
toFun := Function.const P1 p
linear := 0
map_vadd' _ _ :=
letI : AddAction V2 P2 := inferInstance
by simp
@[simp]
theorem coe_const (p : P2) : ⇑(const k P1 p) = Function.const P1 p :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem const_apply (p : P2) (q : P1) : (const k P1 p) q = p := rfl
@[simp]
theorem const_linear (p : P2) : (const k P1 p).linear = 0 :=
rfl
variable {k P1}
theorem linear_eq_zero_iff_exists_const (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) :
f.linear = 0 ↔ ∃ q, f = const k P1 q := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· use f (Classical.arbitrary P1)
ext
rw [coe_const, Function.const_apply, ← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V2, ← f.linearMap_vsub, h,
LinearMap.zero_apply]
· rcases h with ⟨q, rfl⟩
exact const_linear k P1 q
instance nonempty : Nonempty (P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) :=
(AddTorsor.nonempty : Nonempty P2).map <| const k P1
/-- Construct an affine map by verifying the relation between the map and its linear part at one
base point. Namely, this function takes a map `f : P₁ → P₂`, a linear map `f' : V₁ →ₗ[k] V₂`, and
a point `p` such that for any other point `p'` we have `f p' = f' (p' -ᵥ p) +ᵥ f p`. -/
def mk' (f : P1 → P2) (f' : V1 →ₗ[k] V2) (p : P1) (h : ∀ p' : P1, f p' = f' (p' -ᵥ p) +ᵥ f p) :
P1 →ᵃ[k] P2 where
toFun := f
linear := f'
map_vadd' p' v := by rw [h, h p', vadd_vsub_assoc, f'.map_add, vadd_vadd]
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk' (f : P1 → P2) (f' : V1 →ₗ[k] V2) (p h) : ⇑(mk' f f' p h) = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk'_linear (f : P1 → P2) (f' : V1 →ₗ[k] V2) (p h) : (mk' f f' p h).linear = f' :=
rfl
section SMul
variable {R : Type*} [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R V2] [SMulCommClass k R V2]
/-- The space of affine maps to a module inherits an `R`-action from the action on its codomain. -/
instance mulAction : MulAction R (P1 →ᵃ[k] V2) where
smul c f := ⟨c • ⇑f, c • f.linear, fun p v => by simp [smul_add]⟩
one_smul _ := ext fun _ => one_smul _ _
mul_smul _ _ _ := ext fun _ => mul_smul _ _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul (c : R) (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] V2) : ⇑(c • f) = c • ⇑f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem smul_linear (t : R) (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] V2) : (t • f).linear = t • f.linear :=
rfl
instance isCentralScalar [DistribMulAction Rᵐᵒᵖ V2] [IsCentralScalar R V2] :
IsCentralScalar R (P1 →ᵃ[k] V2) where
op_smul_eq_smul _r _x := ext fun _ => op_smul_eq_smul _ _
end SMul
instance : Zero (P1 →ᵃ[k] V2) where zero := ⟨0, 0, fun _ _ => (zero_vadd _ _).symm⟩
instance : Add (P1 →ᵃ[k] V2) where
add f g := ⟨f + g, f.linear + g.linear, fun p v => by simp [add_add_add_comm]⟩
instance : Sub (P1 →ᵃ[k] V2) where
sub f g := ⟨f - g, f.linear - g.linear, fun p v => by simp [sub_add_sub_comm]⟩
instance : Neg (P1 →ᵃ[k] V2) where
neg f := ⟨-f, -f.linear, fun p v => by simp [add_comm, map_vadd f]⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : ⇑(0 : P1 →ᵃ[k] V2) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add (f g : P1 →ᵃ[k] V2) : ⇑(f + g) = f + g :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_neg (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] V2) : ⇑(-f) = -f :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub (f g : P1 →ᵃ[k] V2) : ⇑(f - g) = f - g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_linear : (0 : P1 →ᵃ[k] V2).linear = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_linear (f g : P1 →ᵃ[k] V2) : (f + g).linear = f.linear + g.linear :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sub_linear (f g : P1 →ᵃ[k] V2) : (f - g).linear = f.linear - g.linear :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem neg_linear (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] V2) : (-f).linear = -f.linear :=
rfl
/-- The set of affine maps to a vector space is an additive commutative group. -/
instance : AddCommGroup (P1 →ᵃ[k] V2) :=
coeFn_injective.addCommGroup _ coe_zero coe_add coe_neg coe_sub (fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _)
fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _
/-- The space of affine maps from `P1` to `P2` is an affine space over the space of affine maps
from `P1` to the vector space `V2` corresponding to `P2`. -/
instance : AffineSpace (P1 →ᵃ[k] V2) (P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) where
vadd f g :=
⟨fun p => f p +ᵥ g p, f.linear + g.linear,
fun p v => by simp [vadd_vadd, add_right_comm]⟩
zero_vadd f := ext fun p => zero_vadd _ (f p)
add_vadd f₁ f₂ f₃ := ext fun p => add_vadd (f₁ p) (f₂ p) (f₃ p)
vsub f g :=
⟨fun p => f p -ᵥ g p, f.linear - g.linear, fun p v => by
simp [vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vadd_vsub_assoc, add_sub, sub_add_eq_add_sub]⟩
vsub_vadd' f g := ext fun p => vsub_vadd (f p) (g p)
vadd_vsub' f g := ext fun p => vadd_vsub (f p) (g p)
@[simp]
theorem vadd_apply (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] V2) (g : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) (p : P1) : (f +ᵥ g) p = f p +ᵥ g p :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem vsub_apply (f g : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) (p : P1) : (f -ᵥ g : P1 →ᵃ[k] V2) p = f p -ᵥ g p :=
rfl
/-- `Prod.fst` as an `AffineMap`. -/
def fst : P1 × P2 →ᵃ[k] P1 where
toFun := Prod.fst
linear := LinearMap.fst k V1 V2
map_vadd' _ _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_fst : ⇑(fst : P1 × P2 →ᵃ[k] P1) = Prod.fst :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_linear : (fst : P1 × P2 →ᵃ[k] P1).linear = LinearMap.fst k V1 V2 :=
rfl
/-- `Prod.snd` as an `AffineMap`. -/
def snd : P1 × P2 →ᵃ[k] P2 where
toFun := Prod.snd
linear := LinearMap.snd k V1 V2
map_vadd' _ _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_snd : ⇑(snd : P1 × P2 →ᵃ[k] P2) = Prod.snd :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_linear : (snd : P1 × P2 →ᵃ[k] P2).linear = LinearMap.snd k V1 V2 :=
rfl
variable (k P1)
/-- Identity map as an affine map. -/
nonrec def id : P1 →ᵃ[k] P1 where
toFun := id
linear := LinearMap.id
map_vadd' _ _ := rfl
/-- The identity affine map acts as the identity. -/
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_id : ⇑(id k P1) = _root_.id :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem id_linear : (id k P1).linear = LinearMap.id :=
rfl
variable {P1}
/-- The identity affine map acts as the identity. -/
theorem id_apply (p : P1) : id k P1 p = p :=
rfl
variable {k}
instance : Inhabited (P1 →ᵃ[k] P1) :=
⟨id k P1⟩
/-- Composition of affine maps. -/
def comp (f : P2 →ᵃ[k] P3) (g : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) : P1 →ᵃ[k] P3 where
toFun := f ∘ g
linear := f.linear.comp g.linear
map_vadd' := by
intro p v
rw [Function.comp_apply, g.map_vadd, f.map_vadd]
rfl
/-- Composition of affine maps acts as applying the two functions. -/
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp (f : P2 →ᵃ[k] P3) (g : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) : ⇑(f.comp g) = f ∘ g :=
rfl
/-- Composition of affine maps acts as applying the two functions. -/
theorem comp_apply (f : P2 →ᵃ[k] P3) (g : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) (p : P1) : f.comp g p = f (g p) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_id (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) : f.comp (id k P1) = f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem id_comp (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) : (id k P2).comp f = f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem comp_assoc (f₃₄ : P3 →ᵃ[k] P4) (f₂₃ : P2 →ᵃ[k] P3) (f₁₂ : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) :
(f₃₄.comp f₂₃).comp f₁₂ = f₃₄.comp (f₂₃.comp f₁₂) :=
rfl
instance : Monoid (P1 →ᵃ[k] P1) where
one := id k P1
mul := comp
one_mul := id_comp
mul_one := comp_id
mul_assoc := comp_assoc
@[simp]
theorem coe_mul (f g : P1 →ᵃ[k] P1) : ⇑(f * g) = f ∘ g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_one : ⇑(1 : P1 →ᵃ[k] P1) = _root_.id :=
rfl
/-- `AffineMap.linear` on endomorphisms is a `MonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def linearHom : (P1 →ᵃ[k] P1) →* V1 →ₗ[k] V1 where
toFun := linear
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' _ _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem linear_injective_iff (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) :
Function.Injective f.linear ↔ Function.Injective f := by
obtain ⟨p⟩ := (inferInstance : Nonempty P1)
have h : ⇑f.linear = (Equiv.vaddConst (f p)).symm ∘ f ∘ Equiv.vaddConst p := by
ext v
simp [f.map_vadd, vadd_vsub_assoc]
rw [h, Equiv.comp_injective, Equiv.injective_comp]
@[simp]
theorem linear_surjective_iff (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) :
Function.Surjective f.linear ↔ Function.Surjective f := by
obtain ⟨p⟩ := (inferInstance : Nonempty P1)
have h : ⇑f.linear = (Equiv.vaddConst (f p)).symm ∘ f ∘ Equiv.vaddConst p := by
ext v
simp [f.map_vadd, vadd_vsub_assoc]
rw [h, Equiv.comp_surjective, Equiv.surjective_comp]
@[simp]
theorem linear_bijective_iff (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) :
Function.Bijective f.linear ↔ Function.Bijective f :=
and_congr f.linear_injective_iff f.linear_surjective_iff
theorem image_vsub_image {s t : Set P1} (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) :
f '' s -ᵥ f '' t = f.linear '' (s -ᵥ t) := by
ext v
simp only [Set.mem_vsub, Set.mem_image,
exists_exists_and_eq_and, exists_and_left, ← f.linearMap_vsub]
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hv⟩
exact ⟨x -ᵥ y, ⟨x, hx, y, hy, rfl⟩, hv⟩
· rintro ⟨-, ⟨x, hx, y, hy, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨x, hx, y, hy, rfl⟩
/-! ### Definition of `AffineMap.lineMap` and lemmas about it -/
/-- The affine map from `k` to `P1` sending `0` to `p₀` and `1` to `p₁`. -/
def lineMap (p₀ p₁ : P1) : k →ᵃ[k] P1 :=
((LinearMap.id : k →ₗ[k] k).smulRight (p₁ -ᵥ p₀)).toAffineMap +ᵥ const k k p₀
theorem coe_lineMap (p₀ p₁ : P1) : (lineMap p₀ p₁ : k → P1) = fun c => c • (p₁ -ᵥ p₀) +ᵥ p₀ :=
rfl
theorem lineMap_apply (p₀ p₁ : P1) (c : k) : lineMap p₀ p₁ c = c • (p₁ -ᵥ p₀) +ᵥ p₀ :=
rfl
theorem lineMap_apply_module' (p₀ p₁ : V1) (c : k) : lineMap p₀ p₁ c = c • (p₁ - p₀) + p₀ :=
rfl
theorem lineMap_apply_module (p₀ p₁ : V1) (c : k) : lineMap p₀ p₁ c = (1 - c) • p₀ + c • p₁ := by
simp [lineMap_apply_module', smul_sub, sub_smul]; abel
theorem lineMap_apply_ring' (a b c : k) : lineMap a b c = c * (b - a) + a :=
rfl
theorem lineMap_apply_ring (a b c : k) : lineMap a b c = (1 - c) * a + c * b :=
lineMap_apply_module a b c
theorem lineMap_vadd_apply (p : P1) (v : V1) (c : k) : lineMap p (v +ᵥ p) c = c • v +ᵥ p := by
rw [lineMap_apply, vadd_vsub]
@[simp]
theorem lineMap_linear (p₀ p₁ : P1) :
(lineMap p₀ p₁ : k →ᵃ[k] P1).linear = LinearMap.id.smulRight (p₁ -ᵥ p₀) :=
add_zero _
theorem lineMap_same_apply (p : P1) (c : k) : lineMap p p c = p := by
simp [lineMap_apply]
@[simp]
theorem lineMap_same (p : P1) : lineMap p p = const k k p :=
ext <| lineMap_same_apply p
@[simp]
theorem lineMap_apply_zero (p₀ p₁ : P1) : lineMap p₀ p₁ (0 : k) = p₀ := by
simp [lineMap_apply]
@[simp]
theorem lineMap_apply_one (p₀ p₁ : P1) : lineMap p₀ p₁ (1 : k) = p₁ := by
simp [lineMap_apply]
@[simp]
theorem lineMap_eq_lineMap_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors k V1] {p₀ p₁ : P1} {c₁ c₂ : k} :
lineMap p₀ p₁ c₁ = lineMap p₀ p₁ c₂ ↔ p₀ = p₁ ∨ c₁ = c₂ := by
rw [lineMap_apply, lineMap_apply, ← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V1, vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_right, ←
sub_smul, smul_eq_zero, sub_eq_zero, vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq, or_comm, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem lineMap_eq_left_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors k V1] {p₀ p₁ : P1} {c : k} :
lineMap p₀ p₁ c = p₀ ↔ p₀ = p₁ ∨ c = 0 := by
rw [← @lineMap_eq_lineMap_iff k V1, lineMap_apply_zero]
@[simp]
theorem lineMap_eq_right_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors k V1] {p₀ p₁ : P1} {c : k} :
lineMap p₀ p₁ c = p₁ ↔ p₀ = p₁ ∨ c = 1 := by
rw [← @lineMap_eq_lineMap_iff k V1, lineMap_apply_one]
variable (k) in
theorem lineMap_injective [NoZeroSMulDivisors k V1] {p₀ p₁ : P1} (h : p₀ ≠ p₁) :
Function.Injective (lineMap p₀ p₁ : k → P1) := fun _c₁ _c₂ hc =>
(lineMap_eq_lineMap_iff.mp hc).resolve_left h
@[simp]
theorem apply_lineMap (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) (p₀ p₁ : P1) (c : k) :
f (lineMap p₀ p₁ c) = lineMap (f p₀) (f p₁) c := by
simp [lineMap_apply]
@[simp]
theorem comp_lineMap (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) (p₀ p₁ : P1) :
f.comp (lineMap p₀ p₁) = lineMap (f p₀) (f p₁) :=
ext <| f.apply_lineMap p₀ p₁
@[simp]
theorem fst_lineMap (p₀ p₁ : P1 × P2) (c : k) : (lineMap p₀ p₁ c).1 = lineMap p₀.1 p₁.1 c :=
fst.apply_lineMap p₀ p₁ c
@[simp]
theorem snd_lineMap (p₀ p₁ : P1 × P2) (c : k) : (lineMap p₀ p₁ c).2 = lineMap p₀.2 p₁.2 c :=
snd.apply_lineMap p₀ p₁ c
theorem lineMap_symm (p₀ p₁ : P1) :
lineMap p₀ p₁ = (lineMap p₁ p₀).comp (lineMap (1 : k) (0 : k)) := by
rw [comp_lineMap]
simp
theorem lineMap_apply_one_sub (p₀ p₁ : P1) (c : k) : lineMap p₀ p₁ (1 - c) = lineMap p₁ p₀ c := by
rw [lineMap_symm p₀, comp_apply]
congr
simp [lineMap_apply]
@[simp]
theorem lineMap_vsub_left (p₀ p₁ : P1) (c : k) : lineMap p₀ p₁ c -ᵥ p₀ = c • (p₁ -ᵥ p₀) :=
vadd_vsub _ _
@[simp]
| theorem left_vsub_lineMap (p₀ p₁ : P1) (c : k) : p₀ -ᵥ lineMap p₀ p₁ c = c • (p₀ -ᵥ p₁) := by
rw [← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, lineMap_vsub_left, ← smul_neg, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/AffineSpace/AffineMap.lean | 539 | 540 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
/-!
# Lemmas about `List`s and `Set.range`
In this file we prove lemmas about range of some operations on lists.
-/
open List
variable {α β : Type*} (l : List α)
namespace Set
theorem range_list_map (f : α → β) : range (map f) = { l | ∀ x ∈ l, x ∈ range f } := by
refine antisymm (range_subset_iff.2 fun l => forall_mem_map.2 fun y _ => mem_range_self _)
| fun l hl => ?_
induction l with
| nil => exact ⟨[], rfl⟩
| cons a l ihl =>
rcases ihl fun x hx => hl x <| subset_cons_self _ _ hx with ⟨l, rfl⟩
rcases hl a mem_cons_self with ⟨a, rfl⟩
exact ⟨a :: l, map_cons⟩
| Mathlib/Data/Set/List.lean | 24 | 30 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.RingedSpace.PresheafedSpace.Gluing
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.Cover.Open
/-!
# Gluing Schemes
Given a family of gluing data of schemes, we may glue them together.
## Main definitions
* `AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.GlueData`: A structure containing the family of gluing data.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.GlueData.glued`: The glued scheme.
This is defined as the multicoequalizer of `∐ V i j ⇉ ∐ U i`, so that the general colimit API
can be used.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.GlueData.ι`: The immersion `ι i : U i ⟶ glued` for each `i : J`.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.GlueData.isoCarrier`: The isomorphism between the underlying space
of the glued scheme and the gluing of the underlying topological spaces.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.OpenCover.gluedCover`: The glue data associated with an open cover.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.OpenCover.fromGlued`: The canonical morphism
`𝒰.gluedCover.glued ⟶ X`. This has an `is_iso` instance.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.OpenCover.glueMorphisms`: We may glue a family of compatible
morphisms defined on an open cover of a scheme.
## Main results
* `AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.GlueData.ι_isOpenImmersion`: The map `ι i : U i ⟶ glued`
is an open immersion for each `i : J`.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.GlueData.ι_jointly_surjective` : The underlying maps of
`ι i : U i ⟶ glued` are jointly surjective.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.GlueData.vPullbackConeIsLimit` : `V i j` is the pullback
(intersection) of `U i` and `U j` over the glued space.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.GlueData.ι_eq_iff` : `ι i x = ι j y` if and only if they coincide
when restricted to `V i i`.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.GlueData.isOpen_iff` : A subset of the glued scheme is open iff
all its preimages in `U i` are open.
## Implementation details
All the hard work is done in `AlgebraicGeometry/PresheafedSpace/Gluing.lean` where we glue
presheafed spaces, sheafed spaces, and locally ringed spaces.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u
open TopologicalSpace CategoryTheory Opposite Topology
open CategoryTheory.Limits AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace
open CategoryTheory.GlueData
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
namespace Scheme
/-- A family of gluing data consists of
1. An index type `J`
2. A scheme `U i` for each `i : J`.
3. A scheme `V i j` for each `i j : J`.
(Note that this is `J × J → Scheme` rather than `J → J → Scheme` to connect to the
limits library easier.)
4. An open immersion `f i j : V i j ⟶ U i` for each `i j : ι`.
5. A transition map `t i j : V i j ⟶ V j i` for each `i j : ι`.
such that
6. `f i i` is an isomorphism.
7. `t i i` is the identity.
8. `V i j ×[U i] V i k ⟶ V i j ⟶ V j i` factors through `V j k ×[U j] V j i ⟶ V j i` via some
`t' : V i j ×[U i] V i k ⟶ V j k ×[U j] V j i`.
9. `t' i j k ≫ t' j k i ≫ t' k i j = 𝟙 _`.
We can then glue the schemes `U i` together by identifying `V i j` with `V j i`, such
that the `U i`'s are open subschemes of the glued space.
-/
structure GlueData extends CategoryTheory.GlueData Scheme where
f_open : ∀ i j, IsOpenImmersion (f i j)
attribute [instance] GlueData.f_open
namespace GlueData
variable (D : GlueData.{u})
local notation "𝖣" => D.toGlueData
/-- The glue data of locally ringed spaces associated to a family of glue data of schemes. -/
abbrev toLocallyRingedSpaceGlueData : LocallyRingedSpace.GlueData :=
{ f_open := D.f_open
toGlueData := 𝖣.mapGlueData forgetToLocallyRingedSpace }
instance (i j : 𝖣.J) :
LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion ((D.toLocallyRingedSpaceGlueData).toGlueData.f i j) := by
apply GlueData.f_open
instance (i j : 𝖣.J) :
SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
(D.toLocallyRingedSpaceGlueData.toSheafedSpaceGlueData.toGlueData.f i j) := by
apply GlueData.f_open
instance (i j : 𝖣.J) :
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
(D.toLocallyRingedSpaceGlueData.toSheafedSpaceGlueData.toPresheafedSpaceGlueData.toGlueData.f
i j) := by
apply GlueData.f_open
instance (i : 𝖣.J) :
LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion ((D.toLocallyRingedSpaceGlueData).toGlueData.ι i) := by
apply LocallyRingedSpace.GlueData.ι_isOpenImmersion
/-- (Implementation). The glued scheme of a glue data.
This should not be used outside this file. Use `AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.GlueData.glued` instead. -/
def gluedScheme : Scheme := by
apply LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.scheme
D.toLocallyRingedSpaceGlueData.toGlueData.glued
intro x
obtain ⟨i, y, rfl⟩ := D.toLocallyRingedSpaceGlueData.ι_jointly_surjective x
refine ⟨_, ((D.U i).affineCover.map y).toLRSHom ≫
D.toLocallyRingedSpaceGlueData.toGlueData.ι i, ?_⟩
constructor
· simp only [LocallyRingedSpace.comp_toShHom, SheafedSpace.comp_base, TopCat.hom_comp,
ContinuousMap.coe_comp, Set.range_comp]
refine Set.mem_image_of_mem _ ?_
exact (D.U i).affineCover.covers y
· infer_instance
instance : CreatesColimit 𝖣.diagram.multispan forgetToLocallyRingedSpace :=
createsColimitOfFullyFaithfulOfIso D.gluedScheme
(HasColimit.isoOfNatIso (𝖣.diagramIso forgetToLocallyRingedSpace).symm)
instance : PreservesColimit (𝖣.diagram.multispan) forgetToTop :=
inferInstanceAs (PreservesColimit (𝖣.diagram).multispan (forgetToLocallyRingedSpace ⋙
LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forget CommRingCat))
instance : HasMulticoequalizer 𝖣.diagram :=
hasColimit_of_created _ forgetToLocallyRingedSpace
/-- The glued scheme of a glued space. -/
abbrev glued : Scheme :=
𝖣.glued
/-- The immersion from `D.U i` into the glued space. -/
abbrev ι (i : D.J) : D.U i ⟶ D.glued :=
𝖣.ι i
/-- The gluing as sheafed spaces is isomorphic to the gluing as presheafed spaces. -/
abbrev isoLocallyRingedSpace :
D.glued.toLocallyRingedSpace ≅ D.toLocallyRingedSpaceGlueData.toGlueData.glued :=
𝖣.gluedIso forgetToLocallyRingedSpace
theorem ι_isoLocallyRingedSpace_inv (i : D.J) :
D.toLocallyRingedSpaceGlueData.toGlueData.ι i ≫
D.isoLocallyRingedSpace.inv = (𝖣.ι i).toLRSHom :=
𝖣.ι_gluedIso_inv forgetToLocallyRingedSpace i
instance ι_isOpenImmersion (i : D.J) : IsOpenImmersion (𝖣.ι i) := by
rw [IsOpenImmersion, ← D.ι_isoLocallyRingedSpace_inv]; infer_instance
theorem ι_jointly_surjective (x : 𝖣.glued.carrier) :
∃ (i : D.J) (y : (D.U i).carrier), (D.ι i).base y = x :=
𝖣.ι_jointly_surjective (forgetToTop ⋙ forget TopCat) x
/-- Promoted to higher priority to short circuit simplifier. -/
@[simp (high), reassoc]
theorem glue_condition (i j : D.J) : D.t i j ≫ D.f j i ≫ D.ι j = D.f i j ≫ D.ι i :=
𝖣.glue_condition i j
/-- The pullback cone spanned by `V i j ⟶ U i` and `V i j ⟶ U j`.
This is a pullback diagram (`vPullbackConeIsLimit`). -/
def vPullbackCone (i j : D.J) : PullbackCone (D.ι i) (D.ι j) :=
PullbackCone.mk (D.f i j) (D.t i j ≫ D.f j i) (by simp)
/-- The following diagram is a pullback, i.e. `Vᵢⱼ` is the intersection of `Uᵢ` and `Uⱼ` in `X`.
```
Vᵢⱼ ⟶ Uᵢ
| |
↓ ↓
Uⱼ ⟶ X
```
-/
def vPullbackConeIsLimit (i j : D.J) : IsLimit (D.vPullbackCone i j) :=
𝖣.vPullbackConeIsLimitOfMap forgetToLocallyRingedSpace i j
(D.toLocallyRingedSpaceGlueData.vPullbackConeIsLimit _ _)
local notation "D_" => TopCat.GlueData.toGlueData <|
D.toLocallyRingedSpaceGlueData.toSheafedSpaceGlueData.toPresheafedSpaceGlueData.toTopGlueData
/-- The underlying topological space of the glued scheme is isomorphic to the gluing of the
underlying spaces -/
def isoCarrier :
D.glued.carrier ≅ (D_).glued := by
refine (PresheafedSpace.forget _).mapIso ?_ ≪≫
GlueData.gluedIso _ (PresheafedSpace.forget.{_, _, u} _)
refine SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace.mapIso ?_ ≪≫
SheafedSpace.GlueData.isoPresheafedSpace _
refine LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace.mapIso ?_ ≪≫
LocallyRingedSpace.GlueData.isoSheafedSpace _
exact Scheme.GlueData.isoLocallyRingedSpace _
@[simp]
theorem ι_isoCarrier_inv (i : D.J) :
(D_).ι i ≫ D.isoCarrier.inv = (D.ι i).base := by
delta isoCarrier
rw [Iso.trans_inv, GlueData.ι_gluedIso_inv_assoc, Functor.mapIso_inv, Iso.trans_inv,
Functor.mapIso_inv, Iso.trans_inv, SheafedSpace.forgetToPresheafedSpace_map, forget_map,
forget_map, ← PresheafedSpace.comp_base, ← Category.assoc,
D.toLocallyRingedSpaceGlueData.toSheafedSpaceGlueData.ι_isoPresheafedSpace_inv i]
erw [← Category.assoc, D.toLocallyRingedSpaceGlueData.ι_isoSheafedSpace_inv i]
change (_ ≫ D.isoLocallyRingedSpace.inv).base = _
rw [D.ι_isoLocallyRingedSpace_inv i]
/-- An equivalence relation on `Σ i, D.U i` that holds iff `𝖣.ι i x = 𝖣.ι j y`.
See `AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.GlueData.ι_eq_iff`. -/
def Rel (a b : Σ i, ((D.U i).carrier : Type _)) : Prop :=
∃ x : (D.V (a.1, b.1)).carrier, (D.f _ _).base x = a.2 ∧ (D.t _ _ ≫ D.f _ _).base x = b.2
theorem ι_eq_iff (i j : D.J) (x : (D.U i).carrier) (y : (D.U j).carrier) :
(𝖣.ι i).base x = (𝖣.ι j).base y ↔ D.Rel ⟨i, x⟩ ⟨j, y⟩ := by
refine Iff.trans ?_
(TopCat.GlueData.ι_eq_iff_rel
D.toLocallyRingedSpaceGlueData.toSheafedSpaceGlueData.toPresheafedSpaceGlueData.toTopGlueData
i j x y)
rw [← ((TopCat.mono_iff_injective D.isoCarrier.inv).mp _).eq_iff, ← ConcreteCategory.comp_apply]
· simp_rw [← D.ι_isoCarrier_inv]
rfl -- `rfl` was not needed before https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/13170
· infer_instance
theorem isOpen_iff (U : Set D.glued.carrier) : IsOpen U ↔ ∀ i, IsOpen ((D.ι i).base ⁻¹' U) := by
rw [← (TopCat.homeoOfIso D.isoCarrier.symm).isOpen_preimage, TopCat.GlueData.isOpen_iff]
apply forall_congr'
intro i
rw [← Set.preimage_comp, ← ι_isoCarrier_inv]
rfl
/-- The open cover of the glued space given by the glue data. -/
@[simps -isSimp]
def openCover (D : Scheme.GlueData) : OpenCover D.glued where
J := D.J
obj := D.U
map := D.ι
f x := (D.ι_jointly_surjective x).choose
covers x := ⟨_, (D.ι_jointly_surjective x).choose_spec.choose_spec⟩
end GlueData
namespace Cover
variable {X : Scheme.{u}} (𝒰 : OpenCover.{u} X)
/-- (Implementation) the transition maps in the glue data associated with an open cover. -/
def gluedCoverT' (x y z : 𝒰.J) :
pullback (pullback.fst (𝒰.map x) (𝒰.map y)) (pullback.fst (𝒰.map x) (𝒰.map z)) ⟶
pullback (pullback.fst (𝒰.map y) (𝒰.map z)) (pullback.fst (𝒰.map y) (𝒰.map x)) := by
refine (pullbackRightPullbackFstIso _ _ _).hom ≫ ?_
refine ?_ ≫ (pullbackSymmetry _ _).hom
refine ?_ ≫ (pullbackRightPullbackFstIso _ _ _).inv
refine pullback.map _ _ _ _ (pullbackSymmetry _ _).hom (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) ?_ ?_
· simp [pullback.condition]
· simp
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem gluedCoverT'_fst_fst (x y z : 𝒰.J) :
𝒰.gluedCoverT' x y z ≫ pullback.fst _ _ ≫ pullback.fst _ _ =
pullback.fst _ _ ≫ pullback.snd _ _ := by
delta gluedCoverT'; simp
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem gluedCoverT'_fst_snd (x y z : 𝒰.J) :
gluedCoverT' 𝒰 x y z ≫ pullback.fst _ _ ≫ pullback.snd _ _ =
pullback.snd _ _ ≫ pullback.snd _ _ := by
delta gluedCoverT'; simp
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem gluedCoverT'_snd_fst (x y z : 𝒰.J) :
gluedCoverT' 𝒰 x y z ≫ pullback.snd _ _ ≫ pullback.fst _ _ =
pullback.fst _ _ ≫ pullback.snd _ _ := by
delta gluedCoverT'; simp
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem gluedCoverT'_snd_snd (x y z : 𝒰.J) :
gluedCoverT' 𝒰 x y z ≫ pullback.snd _ _ ≫ pullback.snd _ _ =
pullback.fst _ _ ≫ pullback.fst _ _ := by
delta gluedCoverT'; simp
theorem glued_cover_cocycle_fst (x y z : 𝒰.J) :
gluedCoverT' 𝒰 x y z ≫ gluedCoverT' 𝒰 y z x ≫ gluedCoverT' 𝒰 z x y ≫ pullback.fst _ _ =
pullback.fst _ _ := by
apply pullback.hom_ext <;> simp
theorem glued_cover_cocycle_snd (x y z : 𝒰.J) :
gluedCoverT' 𝒰 x y z ≫ gluedCoverT' 𝒰 y z x ≫ gluedCoverT' 𝒰 z x y ≫ pullback.snd _ _ =
pullback.snd _ _ := by
apply pullback.hom_ext <;> simp [pullback.condition]
theorem glued_cover_cocycle (x y z : 𝒰.J) :
gluedCoverT' 𝒰 x y z ≫ gluedCoverT' 𝒰 y z x ≫ gluedCoverT' 𝒰 z x y = 𝟙 _ := by
apply pullback.hom_ext <;> simp_rw [Category.id_comp, Category.assoc]
· apply glued_cover_cocycle_fst
· apply glued_cover_cocycle_snd
/-- The glue data associated with an open cover.
The canonical isomorphism `𝒰.gluedCover.glued ⟶ X` is provided by `𝒰.fromGlued`. -/
@[simps]
def gluedCover : Scheme.GlueData.{u} where
J := 𝒰.J
U := 𝒰.obj
V := fun ⟨x, y⟩ => pullback (𝒰.map x) (𝒰.map y)
f _ _ := pullback.fst _ _
f_id _ := inferInstance
t _ _ := (pullbackSymmetry _ _).hom
t_id x := by simp
t' x y z := gluedCoverT' 𝒰 x y z
| t_fac x y z := by apply pullback.hom_ext <;> simp
-- The `cocycle` field could have been `by tidy` but lean timeouts.
cocycle x y z := glued_cover_cocycle 𝒰 x y z
f_open _ := inferInstance
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/Gluing.lean | 319 | 322 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alex Kontorovich, David Loeffler, Heather Macbeth, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ParametricIntegral
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.CPolynomial
import Mathlib.Analysis.Fourier.AddCircle
import Mathlib.Analysis.Fourier.FourierTransform
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Analytic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.LineDeriv.IntegrationByParts
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Bounds
/-!
# Derivatives of the Fourier transform
In this file we compute the Fréchet derivative of the Fourier transform of `f`, where `f` is a
function such that both `f` and `v ↦ ‖v‖ * ‖f v‖` are integrable. Here the Fourier transform is
understood as an operator `(V → E) → (W → E)`, where `V` and `W` are normed `ℝ`-vector spaces
and the Fourier transform is taken with respect to a continuous `ℝ`-bilinear
pairing `L : V × W → ℝ` and a given reference measure `μ`.
We also investigate higher derivatives: Assuming that `‖v‖^n * ‖f v‖` is integrable, we show
that the Fourier transform of `f` is `C^n`.
We also study in a parallel way the Fourier transform of the derivative, which is obtained by
tensoring the Fourier transform of the original function with the bilinear form. We also get
results for iterated derivatives.
A consequence of these results is that, if a function is smooth and all its derivatives are
integrable when multiplied by `‖v‖^k`, then the same goes for its Fourier transform, with
explicit bounds.
We give specialized versions of these results on inner product spaces (where `L` is the scalar
product) and on the real line, where we express the one-dimensional derivative in more concrete
terms, as the Fourier transform of `-2πI x * f x` (or `(-2πI x)^n * f x` for higher derivatives).
## Main definitions and results
We introduce two convenience definitions:
* `VectorFourier.fourierSMulRight L f`: given `f : V → E` and `L` a bilinear pairing
between `V` and `W`, then this is the function `fun v ↦ -(2 * π * I) (L v ⬝) • f v`,
from `V` to `Hom (W, E)`.
This is essentially `ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight`, up to the factor `- 2πI` designed to make
sure that the Fourier integral of `fourierSMulRight L f` is the derivative of the Fourier
integral of `f`.
* `VectorFourier.fourierPowSMulRight` is the higher order analogue for higher derivatives:
`fourierPowSMulRight L f v n` is informally `(-(2 * π * I))^n (L v ⬝)^n • f v`, in
the space of continuous multilinear maps `W [×n]→L[ℝ] E`.
With these definitions, the statements read as follows, first in a general context
(arbitrary `L` and `μ`):
* `VectorFourier.hasFDerivAt_fourierIntegral`: the Fourier integral of `f` is differentiable, with
derivative the Fourier integral of `fourierSMulRight L f`.
* `VectorFourier.differentiable_fourierIntegral`: the Fourier integral of `f` is differentiable.
* `VectorFourier.fderiv_fourierIntegral`: formula for the derivative of the Fourier integral of `f`.
* `VectorFourier.fourierIntegral_fderiv`: formula for the Fourier integral of the derivative of `f`.
* `VectorFourier.hasFTaylorSeriesUpTo_fourierIntegral`: under suitable integrability conditions,
the Fourier integral of `f` has an explicit Taylor series up to order `N`, given by the Fourier
integrals of `fun v ↦ fourierPowSMulRight L f v n`.
* `VectorFourier.contDiff_fourierIntegral`: under suitable integrability conditions,
the Fourier integral of `f` is `C^n`.
* `VectorFourier.iteratedFDeriv_fourierIntegral`: under suitable integrability conditions,
explicit formula for the `n`-th derivative of the Fourier integral of `f`, as the Fourier
integral of `fun v ↦ fourierPowSMulRight L f v n`.
* `VectorFourier.pow_mul_norm_iteratedFDeriv_fourierIntegral_le`: explicit bounds for the `n`-th
derivative of the Fourier integral, multiplied by a power function, in terms of corresponding
integrals for the original function.
These statements are then specialized to the case of the usual Fourier transform on
finite-dimensional inner product spaces with their canonical Lebesgue measure (covering in
particular the case of the real line), replacing the namespace `VectorFourier` by
the namespace `Real` in the above statements.
We also give specialized versions of the one-dimensional real derivative (and iterated derivative)
in `Real.deriv_fourierIntegral` and `Real.iteratedDeriv_fourierIntegral`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Real Complex MeasureTheory Filter TopologicalSpace
open scoped FourierTransform Topology ContDiff
-- without this local instance, Lean tries first the instance
-- `secondCountableTopologyEither_of_right` (whose priority is 100) and takes a very long time to
-- fail. Since we only use the left instance in this file, we make sure it is tried first.
attribute [local instance 101] secondCountableTopologyEither_of_left
namespace Real
lemma hasDerivAt_fourierChar (x : ℝ) : HasDerivAt (𝐞 · : ℝ → ℂ) (2 * π * I * 𝐞 x) x := by
have h1 (y : ℝ) : 𝐞 y = fourier 1 (y : UnitAddCircle) := by
rw [fourierChar_apply, fourier_coe_apply]
push_cast
ring_nf
simpa only [h1, Int.cast_one, ofReal_one, div_one, mul_one] using hasDerivAt_fourier 1 1 x
lemma differentiable_fourierChar : Differentiable ℝ (𝐞 · : ℝ → ℂ) :=
fun x ↦ (Real.hasDerivAt_fourierChar x).differentiableAt
lemma deriv_fourierChar (x : ℝ) : deriv (𝐞 · : ℝ → ℂ) x = 2 * π * I * 𝐞 x :=
(Real.hasDerivAt_fourierChar x).deriv
variable {V W : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedSpace ℝ V]
[NormedAddCommGroup W] [NormedSpace ℝ W] (L : V →L[ℝ] W →L[ℝ] ℝ)
lemma hasFDerivAt_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_right (v : V) (w : W) :
HasFDerivAt (fun w ↦ (𝐞 (-L v w) : ℂ))
((-2 * π * I * 𝐞 (-L v w)) • (ofRealCLM ∘L (L v))) w := by
have ha : HasFDerivAt (fun w' : W ↦ L v w') (L v) w := ContinuousLinearMap.hasFDerivAt (L v)
convert (hasDerivAt_fourierChar (-L v w)).hasFDerivAt.comp w ha.neg using 1
ext y
simp only [neg_mul, ContinuousLinearMap.coe_smul', ContinuousLinearMap.coe_comp', Pi.smul_apply,
Function.comp_apply, ofRealCLM_apply, smul_eq_mul, ContinuousLinearMap.comp_neg,
ContinuousLinearMap.neg_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.one_apply, real_smul, neg_inj]
ring
lemma fderiv_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_right_apply (v : V) (w y : W) :
fderiv ℝ (fun w ↦ (𝐞 (-L v w) : ℂ)) w y = -2 * π * I * L v y * 𝐞 (-L v w) := by
simp only [(hasFDerivAt_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_right L v w).fderiv, neg_mul,
ContinuousLinearMap.coe_smul', ContinuousLinearMap.coe_comp', Pi.smul_apply,
Function.comp_apply, ofRealCLM_apply, smul_eq_mul, neg_inj]
ring
lemma differentiable_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_right (v : V) :
Differentiable ℝ (fun w ↦ (𝐞 (-L v w) : ℂ)) :=
fun w ↦ (hasFDerivAt_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_right L v w).differentiableAt
lemma hasFDerivAt_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_left (v : V) (w : W) :
HasFDerivAt (fun v ↦ (𝐞 (-L v w) : ℂ))
((-2 * π * I * 𝐞 (-L v w)) • (ofRealCLM ∘L (L.flip w))) v :=
hasFDerivAt_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_right L.flip w v
lemma fderiv_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_left_apply (v y : V) (w : W) :
fderiv ℝ (fun v ↦ (𝐞 (-L v w) : ℂ)) v y = -2 * π * I * L y w * 𝐞 (-L v w) := by
simp only [(hasFDerivAt_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_left L v w).fderiv, neg_mul,
ContinuousLinearMap.coe_smul', ContinuousLinearMap.coe_comp', Pi.smul_apply,
Function.comp_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.flip_apply, ofRealCLM_apply, smul_eq_mul, neg_inj]
ring
lemma differentiable_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_left (w : W) :
Differentiable ℝ (fun v ↦ (𝐞 (-L v w) : ℂ)) :=
fun v ↦ (hasFDerivAt_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_left L v w).differentiableAt
end Real
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E]
namespace VectorFourier
variable {V W : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedSpace ℝ V]
[NormedAddCommGroup W] [NormedSpace ℝ W] (L : V →L[ℝ] W →L[ℝ] ℝ) (f : V → E)
/-- Send a function `f : V → E` to the function `f : V → Hom (W, E)` given by
`v ↦ (w ↦ -2 * π * I * L (v, w) • f v)`. This is designed so that the Fourier transform of
`fourierSMulRight L f` is the derivative of the Fourier transform of `f`. -/
def fourierSMulRight (v : V) : (W →L[ℝ] E) := -(2 * π * I) • (L v).smulRight (f v)
@[simp] lemma fourierSMulRight_apply (v : V) (w : W) :
fourierSMulRight L f v w = -(2 * π * I) • L v w • f v := rfl
/-- The `w`-derivative of the Fourier transform integrand. -/
lemma hasFDerivAt_fourierChar_smul (v : V) (w : W) :
HasFDerivAt (fun w' ↦ 𝐞 (-L v w') • f v) (𝐞 (-L v w) • fourierSMulRight L f v) w := by
have ha : HasFDerivAt (fun w' : W ↦ L v w') (L v) w := ContinuousLinearMap.hasFDerivAt (L v)
convert ((hasDerivAt_fourierChar (-L v w)).hasFDerivAt.comp w ha.neg).smul_const (f v)
ext w' : 1
simp_rw [fourierSMulRight, ContinuousLinearMap.smul_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight_apply]
rw [ContinuousLinearMap.comp_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.neg_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.one_apply, ← smul_assoc, smul_comm,
← smul_assoc, real_smul, real_smul, Submonoid.smul_def, smul_eq_mul]
push_cast
ring_nf
lemma norm_fourierSMulRight (L : V →L[ℝ] W →L[ℝ] ℝ) (f : V → E) (v : V) :
‖fourierSMulRight L f v‖ = (2 * π) * ‖L v‖ * ‖f v‖ := by
rw [fourierSMulRight, norm_smul _ (ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight (L v) (f v)),
norm_neg, norm_mul, norm_mul, norm_I, mul_one, Complex.norm_of_nonneg pi_pos.le,
Complex.norm_two, ContinuousLinearMap.norm_smulRight_apply, ← mul_assoc]
lemma norm_fourierSMulRight_le (L : V →L[ℝ] W →L[ℝ] ℝ) (f : V → E) (v : V) :
‖fourierSMulRight L f v‖ ≤ 2 * π * ‖L‖ * ‖v‖ * ‖f v‖ := calc
‖fourierSMulRight L f v‖ = (2 * π) * ‖L v‖ * ‖f v‖ := norm_fourierSMulRight _ _ _
_ ≤ (2 * π) * (‖L‖ * ‖v‖) * ‖f v‖ := by gcongr; exact L.le_opNorm _
_ = 2 * π * ‖L‖ * ‖v‖ * ‖f v‖ := by ring
lemma _root_.MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.fourierSMulRight
[SecondCountableTopologyEither V (W →L[ℝ] ℝ)] [MeasurableSpace V] [BorelSpace V]
{L : V →L[ℝ] W →L[ℝ] ℝ} {f : V → E} {μ : Measure V}
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun v ↦ fourierSMulRight L f v) μ := by
apply AEStronglyMeasurable.const_smul'
have aux0 : Continuous fun p : (W →L[ℝ] ℝ) × E ↦ p.1.smulRight p.2 :=
(ContinuousLinearMap.smulRightL ℝ W E).continuous₂
have aux1 : AEStronglyMeasurable (fun v ↦ (L v, f v)) μ :=
L.continuous.aestronglyMeasurable.prodMk hf
-- Elaboration without the expected type is faster here:
exact (aux0.comp_aestronglyMeasurable aux1 :)
variable {f}
/-- Main theorem of this section: if both `f` and `x ↦ ‖x‖ * ‖f x‖` are integrable, then the
Fourier transform of `f` has a Fréchet derivative (everywhere in its domain) and its derivative is
the Fourier transform of `smulRight L f`. -/
theorem hasFDerivAt_fourierIntegral
[MeasurableSpace V] [BorelSpace V] [SecondCountableTopology V] {μ : Measure V}
(hf : Integrable f μ) (hf' : Integrable (fun v : V ↦ ‖v‖ * ‖f v‖) μ) (w : W) :
HasFDerivAt (fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ f)
(fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ (fourierSMulRight L f) w) w := by
let F : W → V → E := fun w' v ↦ 𝐞 (-L v w') • f v
let F' : W → V → W →L[ℝ] E := fun w' v ↦ 𝐞 (-L v w') • fourierSMulRight L f v
let B : V → ℝ := fun v ↦ 2 * π * ‖L‖ * ‖v‖ * ‖f v‖
have h0 (w' : W) : Integrable (F w') μ :=
(fourierIntegral_convergent_iff continuous_fourierChar
(by apply L.continuous₂ : Continuous (fun p : V × W ↦ L.toLinearMap₂ p.1 p.2)) w').2 hf
have h1 : ∀ᶠ w' in 𝓝 w, AEStronglyMeasurable (F w') μ :=
Eventually.of_forall (fun w' ↦ (h0 w').aestronglyMeasurable)
have h3 : AEStronglyMeasurable (F' w) μ := by
refine .smul ?_ hf.1.fourierSMulRight
refine (continuous_fourierChar.comp ?_).aestronglyMeasurable
fun_prop
have h4 : (∀ᵐ v ∂μ, ∀ (w' : W), w' ∈ Metric.ball w 1 → ‖F' w' v‖ ≤ B v) := by
filter_upwards with v w' _
rw [Circle.norm_smul _ (fourierSMulRight L f v)]
exact norm_fourierSMulRight_le L f v
have h5 : Integrable B μ := by simpa only [← mul_assoc] using hf'.const_mul (2 * π * ‖L‖)
have h6 : ∀ᵐ v ∂μ, ∀ w', w' ∈ Metric.ball w 1 → HasFDerivAt (fun x ↦ F x v) (F' w' v) w' :=
ae_of_all _ (fun v w' _ ↦ hasFDerivAt_fourierChar_smul L f v w')
exact hasFDerivAt_integral_of_dominated_of_fderiv_le one_pos h1 (h0 w) h3 h4 h5 h6
lemma fderiv_fourierIntegral
[MeasurableSpace V] [BorelSpace V] [SecondCountableTopology V] {μ : Measure V}
(hf : Integrable f μ) (hf' : Integrable (fun v : V ↦ ‖v‖ * ‖f v‖) μ) :
fderiv ℝ (fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ f) =
fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ (fourierSMulRight L f) := by
ext w : 1
exact (hasFDerivAt_fourierIntegral L hf hf' w).fderiv
lemma differentiable_fourierIntegral
[MeasurableSpace V] [BorelSpace V] [SecondCountableTopology V] {μ : Measure V}
(hf : Integrable f μ) (hf' : Integrable (fun v : V ↦ ‖v‖ * ‖f v‖) μ) :
Differentiable ℝ (fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ f) :=
fun w ↦ (hasFDerivAt_fourierIntegral L hf hf' w).differentiableAt
/-- The Fourier integral of the derivative of a function is obtained by multiplying the Fourier
integral of the original function by `-L w v`. -/
theorem fourierIntegral_fderiv [MeasurableSpace V] [BorelSpace V] [FiniteDimensional ℝ V]
{μ : Measure V} [Measure.IsAddHaarMeasure μ]
(hf : Integrable f μ) (h'f : Differentiable ℝ f) (hf' : Integrable (fderiv ℝ f) μ) :
fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ (fderiv ℝ f)
= fourierSMulRight (-L.flip) (fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ f) := by
ext w y
let g (v : V) : ℂ := 𝐞 (-L v w)
/- First rewrite things in a simplified form, without any real change. -/
suffices ∫ x, g x • fderiv ℝ f x y ∂μ = ∫ x, (2 * ↑π * I * L y w * g x) • f x ∂μ by
rw [fourierIntegral_continuousLinearMap_apply' hf']
simpa only [fourierIntegral, ContinuousLinearMap.toLinearMap₂_apply, fourierSMulRight_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.neg_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.flip_apply, ← integral_smul, neg_smul,
smul_neg, ← smul_smul, coe_smul, neg_neg]
-- Key step: integrate by parts with respect to `y` to switch the derivative from `f` to `g`.
have A x : fderiv ℝ g x y = - 2 * ↑π * I * L y w * g x :=
fderiv_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_left_apply _ _ _ _
rw [integral_smul_fderiv_eq_neg_fderiv_smul_of_integrable, ← integral_neg]
· congr with x
simp only [A, neg_mul, neg_smul, neg_neg]
· have : Integrable (fun x ↦ (-(2 * ↑π * I * ↑((L y) w)) • ((g x : ℂ) • f x))) μ :=
((fourierIntegral_convergent_iff' _ _).2 hf).smul _
convert this using 2 with x
simp only [A, neg_mul, neg_smul, smul_smul]
· exact (fourierIntegral_convergent_iff' _ _).2 (hf'.apply_continuousLinearMap _)
· exact (fourierIntegral_convergent_iff' _ _).2 hf
· exact differentiable_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_left _ _
· exact h'f
/-- The formal multilinear series whose `n`-th term is
`(w₁, ..., wₙ) ↦ (-2πI)^n * L v w₁ * ... * L v wₙ • f v`, as a continuous multilinear map in
the space `W [×n]→L[ℝ] E`.
This is designed so that the Fourier transform of `v ↦ fourierPowSMulRight L f v n` is the
`n`-th derivative of the Fourier transform of `f`.
-/
def fourierPowSMulRight (f : V → E) (v : V) : FormalMultilinearSeries ℝ W E := fun n ↦
(- (2 * π * I))^n • ((ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiRing ℝ (Fin n) (f v)).compContinuousLinearMap
(fun _ ↦ L v))
/- Increase the priority to make sure that this lemma is used instead of
`FormalMultilinearSeries.apply_eq_prod_smul_coeff` even in dimension 1. -/
@[simp 1100] lemma fourierPowSMulRight_apply {f : V → E} {v : V} {n : ℕ} {m : Fin n → W} :
fourierPowSMulRight L f v n m = (- (2 * π * I))^n • (∏ i, L v (m i)) • f v := by
simp [fourierPowSMulRight]
open ContinuousMultilinearMap
/-- Decomposing `fourierPowSMulRight L f v n` as a composition of continuous bilinear and
multilinear maps, to deduce easily its continuity and differentiability properties. -/
lemma fourierPowSMulRight_eq_comp {f : V → E} {v : V} {n : ℕ} :
fourierPowSMulRight L f v n = (- (2 * π * I))^n • smulRightL ℝ (fun (_ : Fin n) ↦ W) E
(compContinuousLinearMapLRight
(ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra ℝ (Fin n) ℝ) (fun _ ↦ L v)) (f v) := rfl
@[continuity, fun_prop]
lemma _root_.Continuous.fourierPowSMulRight {f : V → E} (hf : Continuous f) (n : ℕ) :
Continuous (fun v ↦ fourierPowSMulRight L f v n) := by
simp_rw [fourierPowSMulRight_eq_comp]
apply Continuous.const_smul
apply (smulRightL ℝ (fun (_ : Fin n) ↦ W) E).continuous₂.comp₂ _ hf
exact Continuous.comp (map_continuous _) (continuous_pi (fun _ ↦ L.continuous))
lemma _root_.ContDiff.fourierPowSMulRight
{f : V → E} {k : WithTop ℕ∞} (hf : ContDiff ℝ k f) (n : ℕ) :
ContDiff ℝ k (fun v ↦ fourierPowSMulRight L f v n) := by
simp_rw [fourierPowSMulRight_eq_comp]
apply ContDiff.const_smul
apply (smulRightL ℝ (fun (_ : Fin n) ↦ W) E).isBoundedBilinearMap.contDiff.comp₂ _ hf
apply (ContinuousMultilinearMap.contDiff _).comp
exact contDiff_pi.2 (fun _ ↦ L.contDiff)
lemma norm_fourierPowSMulRight_le (f : V → E) (v : V) (n : ℕ) :
‖fourierPowSMulRight L f v n‖ ≤ (2 * π * ‖L‖) ^ n * ‖v‖ ^ n * ‖f v‖ := by
apply ContinuousMultilinearMap.opNorm_le_bound (by positivity) (fun m ↦ ?_)
calc
‖fourierPowSMulRight L f v n m‖
= (2 * π) ^ n * ((∏ x : Fin n, |(L v) (m x)|) * ‖f v‖) := by
simp [abs_of_nonneg pi_nonneg, norm_smul]
_ ≤ (2 * π) ^ n * ((∏ x : Fin n, ‖L‖ * ‖v‖ * ‖m x‖) * ‖f v‖) := by
gcongr with i _hi
exact L.le_opNorm₂ v (m i)
_ = (2 * π * ‖L‖) ^ n * ‖v‖ ^ n * ‖f v‖ * ∏ i : Fin n, ‖m i‖ := by
simp [Finset.prod_mul_distrib, mul_pow]; ring
/-- The iterated derivative of a function multiplied by `(L v ⬝) ^ n` can be controlled in terms
of the iterated derivatives of the initial function. -/
lemma norm_iteratedFDeriv_fourierPowSMulRight
{f : V → E} {K : WithTop ℕ∞} {C : ℝ} (hf : ContDiff ℝ K f) {n : ℕ} {k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ K)
{v : V} (hv : ∀ i ≤ k, ∀ j ≤ n, ‖v‖ ^ j * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ i f v‖ ≤ C) :
‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ k (fun v ↦ fourierPowSMulRight L f v n) v‖ ≤
(2 * π) ^ n * (2 * n + 2) ^ k * ‖L‖ ^ n * C := by
/- We write `fourierPowSMulRight L f v n` as a composition of bilinear and multilinear maps,
thanks to `fourierPowSMulRight_eq_comp`, and then we control the iterated derivatives of these
thanks to general bounds on derivatives of bilinear and multilinear maps. More precisely,
`fourierPowSMulRight L f v n m = (- (2 * π * I))^n • (∏ i, L v (m i)) • f v`. Here,
`(- (2 * π * I))^n` contributes `(2π)^n` to the bound. The second product is bilinear, so the
iterated derivative is controlled as a weighted sum of those of `v ↦ ∏ i, L v (m i)` and of `f`.
The harder part is to control the iterated derivatives of `v ↦ ∏ i, L v (m i)`. For this, one
argues that this is multilinear in `v`, to apply general bounds for iterated derivatives of
multilinear maps. More precisely, we write it as the composition of a multilinear map `T` (making
the product operation) and the tuple of linear maps `v ↦ (L v ⬝, ..., L v ⬝)` -/
simp_rw [fourierPowSMulRight_eq_comp]
-- first step: controlling the iterated derivatives of `v ↦ ∏ i, L v (m i)`, written below
-- as `v ↦ T (fun _ ↦ L v)`, or `T ∘ (ContinuousLinearMap.pi (fun (_ : Fin n) ↦ L))`.
let T : (W →L[ℝ] ℝ) [×n]→L[ℝ] (W [×n]→L[ℝ] ℝ) :=
compContinuousLinearMapLRight (ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra ℝ (Fin n) ℝ)
have I₁ m : ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ m T (fun _ ↦ L v)‖ ≤
n.descFactorial m * 1 * (‖L‖ * ‖v‖) ^ (n - m) := by
have : ‖T‖ ≤ 1 := by
apply (norm_compContinuousLinearMapLRight_le _ _).trans
simp only [norm_mkPiAlgebra, le_refl]
apply (ContinuousMultilinearMap.norm_iteratedFDeriv_le _ _ _).trans
simp only [Fintype.card_fin]
gcongr
refine (pi_norm_le_iff_of_nonneg (by positivity)).mpr (fun _ ↦ ?_)
exact ContinuousLinearMap.le_opNorm _ _
have I₂ m : ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ m (T ∘ (ContinuousLinearMap.pi (fun (_ : Fin n) ↦ L))) v‖ ≤
(n.descFactorial m * 1 * (‖L‖ * ‖v‖) ^ (n - m)) * ‖L‖ ^ m := by
rw [ContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDeriv_comp_right _ (ContinuousMultilinearMap.contDiff _)
_ (mod_cast le_top)]
apply (norm_compContinuousLinearMap_le _ _).trans
simp only [Finset.prod_const, Finset.card_fin]
gcongr
· exact I₁ m
· exact ContinuousLinearMap.norm_pi_le_of_le (fun _ ↦ le_rfl) (norm_nonneg _)
have I₃ m : ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ m (T ∘ (ContinuousLinearMap.pi (fun (_ : Fin n) ↦ L))) v‖ ≤
n.descFactorial m * ‖L‖ ^ n * ‖v‖ ^ (n - m) := by
apply (I₂ m).trans (le_of_eq _)
rcases le_or_lt m n with hm | hm
· rw [show ‖L‖ ^ n = ‖L‖ ^ (m + (n - m)) by rw [Nat.add_sub_cancel' hm], pow_add]
ring
· simp only [Nat.descFactorial_eq_zero_iff_lt.mpr hm, CharP.cast_eq_zero, mul_one, zero_mul]
-- second step: factor out the `(2 * π) ^ n` factor, and cancel it on both sides.
have A : ContDiff ℝ K (fun y ↦ T (fun _ ↦ L y)) :=
(ContinuousMultilinearMap.contDiff _).comp (contDiff_pi.2 fun _ ↦ L.contDiff)
rw [iteratedFDeriv_const_smul_apply' (hf := ((smulRightL ℝ (fun _ ↦ W)
E).isBoundedBilinearMap.contDiff.comp₂ (A.of_le hk) (hf.of_le hk)).contDiffAt),
norm_smul (β := V [×k]→L[ℝ] (W [×n]→L[ℝ] E))]
simp only [mul_assoc, norm_pow, norm_neg, Complex.norm_mul, Complex.norm_ofNat, norm_real,
Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg pi_nonneg, norm_I, mul_one, smulRightL_apply, ge_iff_le]
gcongr
-- third step: argue that the scalar multiplication is bilinear to bound the iterated derivatives
-- of `v ↦ (∏ i, L v (m i)) • f v` in terms of those of `v ↦ (∏ i, L v (m i))` and of `f`.
-- The former are controlled by the first step, the latter by the assumptions.
apply (ContinuousLinearMap.norm_iteratedFDeriv_le_of_bilinear_of_le_one _ A hf _
hk ContinuousMultilinearMap.norm_smulRightL_le).trans
calc
∑ i ∈ Finset.range (k + 1),
k.choose i * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ i (fun (y : V) ↦ T (fun _ ↦ L y)) v‖ *
‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ (k - i) f v‖
≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (k + 1),
k.choose i * (n.descFactorial i * ‖L‖ ^ n * ‖v‖ ^ (n - i)) *
‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ (k - i) f v‖ := by
gcongr with i _hi
exact I₃ i
_ = ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (k + 1), (k.choose i * n.descFactorial i * ‖L‖ ^ n) *
(‖v‖ ^ (n - i) * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ (k - i) f v‖) := by
congr with i
ring
_ ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (k + 1), (k.choose i * (n + 1 : ℕ) ^ k * ‖L‖ ^ n) * C := by
gcongr with i hi
· rw [← Nat.cast_pow, Nat.cast_le]
calc n.descFactorial i ≤ n ^ i := Nat.descFactorial_le_pow _ _
_ ≤ (n + 1) ^ i := by gcongr; omega
_ ≤ (n + 1) ^ k := by gcongr; exacts [le_add_self, Finset.mem_range_succ_iff.mp hi]
· exact hv _ (by omega) _ (by omega)
_ = (2 * n + 2) ^ k * (‖L‖^n * C) := by
simp only [← Finset.sum_mul, ← Nat.cast_sum, Nat.sum_range_choose, mul_one, ← mul_assoc,
Nat.cast_pow, Nat.cast_ofNat, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, ← mul_pow, mul_add]
variable [MeasurableSpace V] [BorelSpace V] {μ : Measure V}
section SecondCountableTopology
variable [SecondCountableTopology V]
lemma _root_.MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.fourierPowSMulRight
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (n : ℕ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun v ↦ fourierPowSMulRight L f v n) μ := by
simp_rw [fourierPowSMulRight_eq_comp]
apply AEStronglyMeasurable.const_smul'
apply (smulRightL ℝ (fun (_ : Fin n) ↦ W) E).continuous₂.comp_aestronglyMeasurable₂ _ hf
apply Continuous.aestronglyMeasurable
exact Continuous.comp (map_continuous _) (continuous_pi (fun _ ↦ L.continuous))
lemma integrable_fourierPowSMulRight {n : ℕ} (hf : Integrable (fun v ↦ ‖v‖ ^ n * ‖f v‖) μ)
(h'f : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) : Integrable (fun v ↦ fourierPowSMulRight L f v n) μ := by
refine (hf.const_mul ((2 * π * ‖L‖) ^ n)).mono' (h'f.fourierPowSMulRight L n) ?_
filter_upwards with v
exact (norm_fourierPowSMulRight_le L f v n).trans (le_of_eq (by ring))
lemma hasFTaylorSeriesUpTo_fourierIntegral {N : WithTop ℕ∞}
(hf : ∀ (n : ℕ), n ≤ N → Integrable (fun v ↦ ‖v‖^n * ‖f v‖) μ)
(h'f : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
HasFTaylorSeriesUpTo N (fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ f)
(fun w n ↦ fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ (fun v ↦ fourierPowSMulRight L f v n) w) := by
constructor
· intro w
rw [curry0_apply, Matrix.zero_empty, fourierIntegral_continuousMultilinearMap_apply'
(integrable_fourierPowSMulRight L (hf 0 bot_le) h'f)]
simp only [fourierPowSMulRight_apply, pow_zero, Finset.univ_eq_empty, Finset.prod_empty,
one_smul]
· intro n hn w
have I₁ : Integrable (fun v ↦ fourierPowSMulRight L f v n) μ :=
integrable_fourierPowSMulRight L (hf n hn.le) h'f
have I₂ : Integrable (fun v ↦ ‖v‖ * ‖fourierPowSMulRight L f v n‖) μ := by
apply ((hf (n+1) (ENat.add_one_natCast_le_withTop_of_lt hn)).const_mul
((2 * π * ‖L‖) ^ n)).mono'
(continuous_norm.aestronglyMeasurable.mul (h'f.fourierPowSMulRight L n).norm)
filter_upwards with v
simp only [Pi.mul_apply, norm_mul, norm_norm]
calc
‖v‖ * ‖fourierPowSMulRight L f v n‖
≤ ‖v‖ * ((2 * π * ‖L‖) ^ n * ‖v‖ ^ n * ‖f v‖) := by
gcongr; apply norm_fourierPowSMulRight_le
_ = (2 * π * ‖L‖) ^ n * (‖v‖ ^ (n + 1) * ‖f v‖) := by rw [pow_succ]; ring
have I₃ : Integrable (fun v ↦ fourierPowSMulRight L f v (n + 1)) μ :=
integrable_fourierPowSMulRight L (hf (n + 1) (ENat.add_one_natCast_le_withTop_of_lt hn)) h'f
have I₄ : Integrable
(fun v ↦ fourierSMulRight L (fun v ↦ fourierPowSMulRight L f v n) v) μ := by
apply (I₂.const_mul ((2 * π * ‖L‖))).mono' (h'f.fourierPowSMulRight L n).fourierSMulRight
filter_upwards with v
exact (norm_fourierSMulRight_le _ _ _).trans (le_of_eq (by ring))
have E : curryLeft
(fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ (fun v ↦ fourierPowSMulRight L f v (n + 1)) w) =
fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂
(fourierSMulRight L fun v ↦ fourierPowSMulRight L f v n) w := by
ext w' m
rw [curryLeft_apply, fourierIntegral_continuousMultilinearMap_apply' I₃,
fourierIntegral_continuousLinearMap_apply' I₄,
fourierIntegral_continuousMultilinearMap_apply' (I₄.apply_continuousLinearMap _)]
congr with v
simp only [fourierPowSMulRight_apply, mul_comm, pow_succ, neg_mul, Fin.prod_univ_succ,
Fin.cons_zero, Fin.cons_succ, neg_smul, fourierSMulRight_apply, neg_apply, smul_apply,
smul_comm (M := ℝ) (N := ℂ) (α := E), smul_smul]
exact E ▸ hasFDerivAt_fourierIntegral L I₁ I₂ w
· intro n hn
apply fourierIntegral_continuous Real.continuous_fourierChar (by apply L.continuous₂)
exact integrable_fourierPowSMulRight L (hf n hn) h'f
/-- Variant of `hasFTaylorSeriesUpTo_fourierIntegral` in which the smoothness index is restricted
to `ℕ∞` (and so are the inequalities in the assumption `hf`). Avoids normcasting in some
applications. -/
lemma hasFTaylorSeriesUpTo_fourierIntegral' {N : ℕ∞}
(hf : ∀ (n : ℕ), n ≤ N → Integrable (fun v ↦ ‖v‖^n * ‖f v‖) μ)
(h'f : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
HasFTaylorSeriesUpTo N (fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ f)
(fun w n ↦ fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ (fun v ↦ fourierPowSMulRight L f v n) w) :=
hasFTaylorSeriesUpTo_fourierIntegral _ (fun n hn ↦ hf n (mod_cast hn)) h'f
/-- If `‖v‖^n * ‖f v‖` is integrable for all `n ≤ N`, then the Fourier transform of `f` is `C^N`. -/
theorem contDiff_fourierIntegral {N : ℕ∞}
(hf : ∀ (n : ℕ), n ≤ N → Integrable (fun v ↦ ‖v‖ ^ n * ‖f v‖) μ) :
ContDiff ℝ N (fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ f) := by
by_cases h'f : Integrable f μ
· exact (hasFTaylorSeriesUpTo_fourierIntegral' L hf h'f.1).contDiff
· have : fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ f = 0 := by
ext w; simp [fourierIntegral, integral, h'f]
simpa [this] using contDiff_const
/-- If `‖v‖^n * ‖f v‖` is integrable for all `n ≤ N`, then the `n`-th derivative of the Fourier
transform of `f` is the Fourier transform of `fourierPowSMulRight L f v n`,
i.e., `(L v ⬝) ^ n • f v`. -/
lemma iteratedFDeriv_fourierIntegral {N : ℕ∞}
(hf : ∀ (n : ℕ), n ≤ N → Integrable (fun v ↦ ‖v‖^n * ‖f v‖) μ)
(h'f : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≤ N) :
iteratedFDeriv ℝ n (fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ f) =
fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ (fun v ↦ fourierPowSMulRight L f v n) := by
ext w : 1
exact ((hasFTaylorSeriesUpTo_fourierIntegral' L hf h'f).eq_iteratedFDeriv
(mod_cast hn) w).symm
end SecondCountableTopology
/-- The Fourier integral of the `n`-th derivative of a function is obtained by multiplying the
Fourier integral of the original function by `(2πI L w ⬝ )^n`. -/
theorem fourierIntegral_iteratedFDeriv [FiniteDimensional ℝ V]
{μ : Measure V} [Measure.IsAddHaarMeasure μ] {N : ℕ∞} (hf : ContDiff ℝ N f)
(h'f : ∀ (n : ℕ), n ≤ N → Integrable (iteratedFDeriv ℝ n f) μ) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≤ N) :
fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ (iteratedFDeriv ℝ n f)
= (fun w ↦ fourierPowSMulRight (-L.flip) (fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ f) w n) := by
induction n with
| zero =>
ext w m
simp only [iteratedFDeriv_zero_apply, fourierPowSMulRight_apply, pow_zero,
Finset.univ_eq_empty, ContinuousLinearMap.neg_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.flip_apply,
Finset.prod_empty, one_smul, fourierIntegral_continuousMultilinearMap_apply' ((h'f 0 bot_le))]
| succ n ih =>
ext w m
have J : Integrable (fderiv ℝ (iteratedFDeriv ℝ n f)) μ := by
specialize h'f (n + 1) hn
rwa [iteratedFDeriv_succ_eq_comp_left, Function.comp_def,
LinearIsometryEquiv.integrable_comp_iff (𝕜 := ℝ) (φ := fderiv ℝ (iteratedFDeriv ℝ n f))]
at h'f
suffices H : (fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ (fderiv ℝ (iteratedFDeriv ℝ n f)) w)
(m 0) (Fin.tail m) =
(-(2 * π * I)) ^ (n + 1) • (∏ x : Fin (n + 1), -L (m x) w) • ∫ v, 𝐞 (-L v w) • f v ∂μ by
| rw [fourierIntegral_continuousMultilinearMap_apply' (h'f _ hn)]
simp only [iteratedFDeriv_succ_apply_left, fourierPowSMulRight_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.neg_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.flip_apply]
rw [← fourierIntegral_continuousMultilinearMap_apply' ((J.apply_continuousLinearMap _)),
← fourierIntegral_continuousLinearMap_apply' J]
exact H
have h'n : n < N := (Nat.cast_lt.mpr n.lt_succ_self).trans_le hn
rw [fourierIntegral_fderiv _ (h'f n h'n.le)
(hf.differentiable_iteratedFDeriv (mod_cast h'n)) J]
simp only [ih h'n.le, fourierSMulRight_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.neg_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.flip_apply, neg_smul, smul_neg, neg_neg, smul_apply,
fourierPowSMulRight_apply, ← coe_smul (E := E), smul_smul]
congr 1
simp only [ofReal_prod, ofReal_neg, pow_succ, mul_neg, Fin.prod_univ_succ, neg_mul,
ofReal_mul, neg_neg, Fin.tail_def]
ring
/-- The `k`-th derivative of the Fourier integral of `f`, multiplied by `(L v w) ^ n`, is the
Fourier integral of the `n`-th derivative of `(L v w) ^ k * f`. -/
theorem fourierPowSMulRight_iteratedFDeriv_fourierIntegral [FiniteDimensional ℝ V]
{μ : Measure V} [Measure.IsAddHaarMeasure μ] {K N : ℕ∞} (hf : ContDiff ℝ N f)
(h'f : ∀ (k n : ℕ), k ≤ K → n ≤ N → Integrable (fun v ↦ ‖v‖ ^ k * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n f v‖) μ)
{k n : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ K) (hn : n ≤ N) {w : W} :
fourierPowSMulRight (-L.flip)
(iteratedFDeriv ℝ k (fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ f)) w n =
fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂
(iteratedFDeriv ℝ n (fun v ↦ fourierPowSMulRight L f v k)) w := by
| Mathlib/Analysis/Fourier/FourierTransformDeriv.lean | 549 | 575 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl, Yuyang Zhao
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Units.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.ExistsOfLE
import Mathlib.Algebra.NeZero
import Mathlib.Order.BoundedOrder.Basic
/-!
# Canonically ordered monoids
-/
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
/-- An ordered additive monoid is `CanonicallyOrderedAdd`
if the ordering coincides with the subtractibility relation,
which is to say, `a ≤ b` iff there exists `c` with `b = a + c`.
This is satisfied by the natural numbers, for example, but not
the integers or other nontrivial `OrderedAddCommGroup`s. -/
class CanonicallyOrderedAdd (α : Type*) [Add α] [LE α] : Prop
extends ExistsAddOfLE α where
/-- For any `a` and `b`, `a ≤ a + b` -/
protected le_self_add : ∀ a b : α, a ≤ a + b
attribute [instance 50] CanonicallyOrderedAdd.toExistsAddOfLE
/-- An ordered monoid is `CanonicallyOrderedMul`
if the ordering coincides with the divisibility relation,
which is to say, `a ≤ b` iff there exists `c` with `b = a * c`.
Examples seem rare; it seems more likely that the `OrderDual`
of a naturally-occurring lattice satisfies this than the lattice
itself (for example, dual of the lattice of ideals of a PID or
Dedekind domain satisfy this; collections of all things ≤ 1 seem to
be more natural that collections of all things ≥ 1). -/
@[to_additive]
class CanonicallyOrderedMul (α : Type*) [Mul α] [LE α] : Prop
extends ExistsMulOfLE α where
/-- For any `a` and `b`, `a ≤ a * b` -/
protected le_self_mul : ∀ a b : α, a ≤ a * b
attribute [instance 50] CanonicallyOrderedMul.toExistsMulOfLE
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A canonically ordered additive monoid is an ordered commutative additive monoid
in which the ordering coincides with the subtractibility relation,
which is to say, `a ≤ b` iff there exists `c` with `b = a + c`.
This is satisfied by the natural numbers, for example, but not
the integers or other nontrivial `OrderedAddCommGroup`s. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[OrderedAddCommMonoid α] [CanonicallyOrderedAdd α]` instead."
(since := "2025-01-13")]
structure CanonicallyOrderedAddCommMonoid (α : Type*) extends
OrderedAddCommMonoid α, OrderBot α where
/-- For `a ≤ b`, there is a `c` so `b = a + c`. -/
protected exists_add_of_le : ∀ {a b : α}, a ≤ b → ∃ c, b = a + c
/-- For any `a` and `b`, `a ≤ a + b` -/
protected le_self_add : ∀ a b : α, a ≤ a + b
set_option linter.deprecated false in
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
/-- A canonically ordered monoid is an ordered commutative monoid
in which the ordering coincides with the divisibility relation,
which is to say, `a ≤ b` iff there exists `c` with `b = a * c`.
Examples seem rare; it seems more likely that the `OrderDual`
of a naturally-occurring lattice satisfies this than the lattice
| itself (for example, dual of the lattice of ideals of a PID or
Dedekind domain satisfy this; collections of all things ≤ 1 seem to
be more natural that collections of all things ≥ 1).
-/
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Monoid/Canonical/Defs.lean | 70 | 73 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Jireh Loreaux. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jireh Loreaux
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.NonUnitalHom
import Mathlib.Data.Set.UnionLift
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Span.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.NonUnitalSubring.Basic
/-!
# Non-unital Subalgebras over Commutative Semirings
In this file we define `NonUnitalSubalgebra`s and the usual operations on them (`map`, `comap`).
## TODO
* once we have scalar actions by semigroups (as opposed to monoids), implement the action of a
non-unital subalgebra on the larger algebra.
-/
universe u u' v v' w w'
section NonUnitalSubalgebraClass
variable {S R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A]
variable [SetLike S A] [NonUnitalSubsemiringClass S A] [hSR : SMulMemClass S R A] (s : S)
namespace NonUnitalSubalgebraClass
/-- Embedding of a non-unital subalgebra into the non-unital algebra. -/
def subtype (s : S) : s →ₙₐ[R] A :=
{ NonUnitalSubsemiringClass.subtype s, SMulMemClass.subtype s with toFun := (↑) }
variable {s} in
@[simp]
lemma subtype_apply (x : s) : subtype s x = x := rfl
lemma subtype_injective :
Function.Injective (subtype s) :=
Subtype.coe_injective
@[simp]
theorem coe_subtype : (subtype s : s → A) = ((↑) : s → A) :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-18")]
alias coeSubtype := coe_subtype
end NonUnitalSubalgebraClass
end NonUnitalSubalgebraClass
/-- A non-unital subalgebra is a sub(semi)ring that is also a submodule. -/
structure NonUnitalSubalgebra (R : Type u) (A : Type v) [CommSemiring R]
[NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A] : Type v
extends NonUnitalSubsemiring A, Submodule R A
/-- Reinterpret a `NonUnitalSubalgebra` as a `NonUnitalSubsemiring`. -/
add_decl_doc NonUnitalSubalgebra.toNonUnitalSubsemiring
/-- Reinterpret a `NonUnitalSubalgebra` as a `Submodule`. -/
add_decl_doc NonUnitalSubalgebra.toSubmodule
namespace NonUnitalSubalgebra
variable {F : Type v'} {R' : Type u'} {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} {C : Type w'}
section NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring C]
variable [Module R A] [Module R B] [Module R C]
instance : SetLike (NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) A where
coe s := s.carrier
coe_injective' p q h := by cases p; cases q; congr; exact SetLike.coe_injective h
/-- The actual `NonUnitalSubalgebra` obtained from an element of a type satisfying
`NonUnitalSubsemiringClass` and `SMulMemClass`. -/
@[simps]
def ofClass {S R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A]
[SetLike S A] [NonUnitalSubsemiringClass S A] [SMulMemClass S R A]
(s : S) : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A where
carrier := s
add_mem' := add_mem
zero_mem' := zero_mem _
mul_mem' := mul_mem
smul_mem' := SMulMemClass.smul_mem
instance (priority := 100) : CanLift (Set A) (NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (↑)
(fun s ↦ 0 ∈ s ∧ (∀ {x y}, x ∈ s → y ∈ s → x + y ∈ s) ∧ (∀ {x y}, x ∈ s → y ∈ s → x * y ∈ s) ∧
∀ (r : R) {x}, x ∈ s → r • x ∈ s) where
prf s h :=
⟨ { carrier := s
zero_mem' := h.1
add_mem' := h.2.1
mul_mem' := h.2.2.1
smul_mem' := h.2.2.2 },
rfl ⟩
instance instNonUnitalSubsemiringClass :
NonUnitalSubsemiringClass (NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) A where
add_mem {s} := s.add_mem'
mul_mem {s} := s.mul_mem'
zero_mem {s} := s.zero_mem'
instance instSMulMemClass : SMulMemClass (NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) R A where
smul_mem := @fun s => s.smul_mem'
theorem mem_carrier {s : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {x : A} : x ∈ s.carrier ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
@[ext]
theorem ext {S T : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} (h : ∀ x : A, x ∈ S ↔ x ∈ T) : S = T :=
SetLike.ext h
@[simp]
theorem mem_toNonUnitalSubsemiring {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {x} :
x ∈ S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring ↔ x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toNonUnitalSubsemiring (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :
(↑S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring : Set A) = S :=
rfl
theorem toNonUnitalSubsemiring_injective :
Function.Injective
(toNonUnitalSubsemiring : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A → NonUnitalSubsemiring A) :=
fun S T h =>
ext fun x => by rw [← mem_toNonUnitalSubsemiring, ← mem_toNonUnitalSubsemiring, h]
theorem toNonUnitalSubsemiring_inj {S U : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} :
S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring = U.toNonUnitalSubsemiring ↔ S = U :=
toNonUnitalSubsemiring_injective.eq_iff
theorem mem_toSubmodule (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) {x} : x ∈ S.toSubmodule ↔ x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toSubmodule (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : (↑S.toSubmodule : Set A) = S :=
rfl
theorem toSubmodule_injective :
Function.Injective (toSubmodule : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A → Submodule R A) := fun S T h =>
ext fun x => by rw [← mem_toSubmodule, ← mem_toSubmodule, h]
theorem toSubmodule_inj {S U : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} : S.toSubmodule = U.toSubmodule ↔ S = U :=
toSubmodule_injective.eq_iff
/-- Copy of a non-unital subalgebra with a new `carrier` equal to the old one.
Useful to fix definitional equalities. -/
protected def copy (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (s : Set A) (hs : s = ↑S) :
NonUnitalSubalgebra R A :=
{ S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring.copy s hs with
smul_mem' := fun r a (ha : a ∈ s) => by
show r • a ∈ s
rw [hs] at ha ⊢
exact S.smul_mem' r ha }
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (s : Set A) (hs : s = ↑S) :
(S.copy s hs : Set A) = s :=
rfl
theorem copy_eq (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (s : Set A) (hs : s = ↑S) : S.copy s hs = S :=
SetLike.coe_injective hs
instance (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : Inhabited S :=
⟨(0 : S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring)⟩
end NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
section NonUnitalNonAssocRing
variable [CommRing R]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocRing A] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing B] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing C]
variable [Module R A] [Module R B] [Module R C]
instance instNonUnitalSubringClass : NonUnitalSubringClass (NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) A :=
{ NonUnitalSubalgebra.instNonUnitalSubsemiringClass with
neg_mem := @fun _ x hx => neg_one_smul R x ▸ SMulMemClass.smul_mem _ hx }
/-- A non-unital subalgebra over a ring is also a `Subring`. -/
def toNonUnitalSubring (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalSubring A where
toNonUnitalSubsemiring := S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring
neg_mem' := neg_mem (s := S)
@[simp]
theorem mem_toNonUnitalSubring {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {x} :
x ∈ S.toNonUnitalSubring ↔ x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toNonUnitalSubring (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :
(↑S.toNonUnitalSubring : Set A) = S :=
rfl
theorem toNonUnitalSubring_injective :
Function.Injective (toNonUnitalSubring : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A → NonUnitalSubring A) :=
fun S T h => ext fun x => by rw [← mem_toNonUnitalSubring, ← mem_toNonUnitalSubring, h]
theorem toNonUnitalSubring_inj {S U : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} :
S.toNonUnitalSubring = U.toNonUnitalSubring ↔ S = U :=
toNonUnitalSubring_injective.eq_iff
end NonUnitalNonAssocRing
section
/-! `NonUnitalSubalgebra`s inherit structure from their `NonUnitalSubsemiring` / `Semiring`
coercions. -/
instance toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A]
(S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring S :=
inferInstance
instance toNonUnitalSemiring [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalSemiring A] [Module R A]
(S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalSemiring S :=
inferInstance
instance toNonUnitalCommSemiring [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalCommSemiring A] [Module R A]
(S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalCommSemiring S :=
inferInstance
instance toNonUnitalNonAssocRing [CommRing R] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing A] [Module R A]
(S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalNonAssocRing S :=
inferInstance
instance toNonUnitalRing [CommRing R] [NonUnitalRing A] [Module R A]
(S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalRing S :=
inferInstance
instance toNonUnitalCommRing [CommRing R] [NonUnitalCommRing A] [Module R A]
(S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalCommRing S :=
inferInstance
end
/-- The forgetful map from `NonUnitalSubalgebra` to `Submodule` as an `OrderEmbedding` -/
def toSubmodule' [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A] :
NonUnitalSubalgebra R A ↪o Submodule R A where
toEmbedding :=
{ toFun := fun S => S.toSubmodule
inj' := fun S T h => ext <| by apply SetLike.ext_iff.1 h }
map_rel_iff' := SetLike.coe_subset_coe.symm.trans SetLike.coe_subset_coe
/-- The forgetful map from `NonUnitalSubalgebra` to `NonUnitalSubsemiring` as an
`OrderEmbedding` -/
def toNonUnitalSubsemiring' [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A] :
NonUnitalSubalgebra R A ↪o NonUnitalSubsemiring A where
toEmbedding :=
{ toFun := fun S => S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring
inj' := fun S T h => ext <| by apply SetLike.ext_iff.1 h }
map_rel_iff' := SetLike.coe_subset_coe.symm.trans SetLike.coe_subset_coe
/-- The forgetful map from `NonUnitalSubalgebra` to `NonUnitalSubsemiring` as an
`OrderEmbedding` -/
def toNonUnitalSubring' [CommRing R] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing A] [Module R A] :
NonUnitalSubalgebra R A ↪o NonUnitalSubring A where
toEmbedding :=
{ toFun := fun S => S.toNonUnitalSubring
inj' := fun S T h => ext <| by apply SetLike.ext_iff.1 h }
map_rel_iff' := SetLike.coe_subset_coe.symm.trans SetLike.coe_subset_coe
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring C]
variable [Module R A] [Module R B] [Module R C]
variable {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A}
section
/-! ### `NonUnitalSubalgebra`s inherit structure from their `Submodule` coercions. -/
instance instModule' [Semiring R'] [SMul R' R] [Module R' A] [IsScalarTower R' R A] : Module R' S :=
SMulMemClass.toModule' _ R' R A S
instance instModule : Module R S :=
S.instModule'
instance instIsScalarTower' [Semiring R'] [SMul R' R] [Module R' A] [IsScalarTower R' R A] :
IsScalarTower R' R S :=
S.toSubmodule.isScalarTower
instance [IsScalarTower R A A] : IsScalarTower R S S where
smul_assoc r x y := Subtype.ext <| smul_assoc r (x : A) (y : A)
instance instSMulCommClass' [Semiring R'] [SMul R' R] [Module R' A] [IsScalarTower R' R A]
[SMulCommClass R' R A] : SMulCommClass R' R S where
smul_comm r' r s := Subtype.ext <| smul_comm r' r (s : A)
instance instSMulCommClass [SMulCommClass R A A] : SMulCommClass R S S where
smul_comm r x y := Subtype.ext <| smul_comm r (x : A) (y : A)
instance noZeroSMulDivisors_bot [NoZeroSMulDivisors R A] : NoZeroSMulDivisors R S :=
⟨fun {c x} h =>
have : c = 0 ∨ (x : A) = 0 := eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero (congr_arg ((↑) : S → A) h)
this.imp_right (@Subtype.ext_iff _ _ x 0).mpr⟩
end
protected theorem coe_add (x y : S) : (↑(x + y) : A) = ↑x + ↑y :=
rfl
protected theorem coe_mul (x y : S) : (↑(x * y) : A) = ↑x * ↑y :=
rfl
protected theorem coe_zero : ((0 : S) : A) = 0 :=
rfl
protected theorem coe_neg {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A]
{S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} (x : S) : (↑(-x) : A) = -↑x :=
rfl
protected theorem coe_sub {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A]
{S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} (x y : S) : (↑(x - y) : A) = ↑x - ↑y :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul [SMul R' R] [SMul R' A] [IsScalarTower R' R A] (r : R') (x : S) :
↑(r • x) = r • (x : A) :=
rfl
protected theorem coe_eq_zero {x : S} : (x : A) = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
ZeroMemClass.coe_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem toNonUnitalSubsemiring_subtype :
NonUnitalSubsemiringClass.subtype S = NonUnitalSubalgebraClass.subtype (R := R) S :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toSubring_subtype {R A : Type*} [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A]
(S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :
NonUnitalSubringClass.subtype S = NonUnitalSubalgebraClass.subtype (R := R) S :=
rfl
/-- Linear equivalence between `S : Submodule R A` and `S`. Though these types are equal,
we define it as a `LinearEquiv` to avoid type equalities. -/
def toSubmoduleEquiv (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : S.toSubmodule ≃ₗ[R] S :=
LinearEquiv.ofEq _ _ rfl
variable [FunLike F A B] [NonUnitalAlgHomClass F R A B]
/-- Transport a non-unital subalgebra via an algebra homomorphism. -/
def map (f : F) (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B :=
{ S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring.map (f : A →ₙ+* B) with
smul_mem' := fun r b hb => by
rcases hb with ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact map_smulₛₗ f r a ▸ Set.mem_image_of_mem f (S.smul_mem' r ha) }
theorem map_mono {S₁ S₂ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {f : F} :
S₁ ≤ S₂ → (map f S₁ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) ≤ map f S₂ :=
Set.image_subset f
theorem map_injective {f : F} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (map f : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A → NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) :=
fun _S₁ _S₂ ih =>
ext <| Set.ext_iff.1 <| Set.image_injective.2 hf <| Set.ext <| SetLike.ext_iff.mp ih
@[simp]
theorem map_id (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : map (NonUnitalAlgHom.id R A) S = S :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_id _
theorem map_map (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (g : B →ₙₐ[R] C) (f : A →ₙₐ[R] B) :
(S.map f).map g = S.map (g.comp f) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_image _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {f : F} {y : B} : y ∈ map f S ↔ ∃ x ∈ S, f x = y :=
NonUnitalSubsemiring.mem_map
theorem map_toSubmodule {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {f : F} :
-- TODO: introduce a better coercion from `NonUnitalAlgHomClass` to `LinearMap`
(map f S).toSubmodule = Submodule.map (LinearMapClass.linearMap f) S.toSubmodule :=
SetLike.coe_injective rfl
theorem map_toNonUnitalSubsemiring {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {f : F} :
(map f S).toNonUnitalSubsemiring = S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring.map (f : A →ₙ+* B) :=
SetLike.coe_injective rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_map (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (f : F) : (map f S : Set B) = f '' S :=
rfl
/-- Preimage of a non-unital subalgebra under an algebra homomorphism. -/
def comap (f : F) (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A :=
{ S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring.comap (f : A →ₙ+* B) with
smul_mem' := fun r a (ha : f a ∈ S) =>
show f (r • a) ∈ S from (map_smulₛₗ f r a).symm ▸ SMulMemClass.smul_mem r ha }
theorem map_le {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {f : F} {U : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B} :
map f S ≤ U ↔ S ≤ comap f U :=
Set.image_subset_iff
theorem gc_map_comap (f : F) :
GaloisConnection (map f : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A → NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) (comap f) :=
fun _ _ => map_le
@[simp]
theorem mem_comap (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) (f : F) (x : A) : x ∈ comap f S ↔ f x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_comap (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) (f : F) : (comap f S : Set A) = f ⁻¹' (S : Set B) :=
rfl
instance noZeroDivisors {R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalSemiring A] [NoZeroDivisors A]
[Module R A] (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : NoZeroDivisors S :=
NonUnitalSubsemiringClass.noZeroDivisors S
end NonUnitalSubalgebra
namespace Submodule
variable {R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A]
/-- A submodule closed under multiplication is a non-unital subalgebra. -/
def toNonUnitalSubalgebra (p : Submodule R A) (h_mul : ∀ x y, x ∈ p → y ∈ p → x * y ∈ p) :
NonUnitalSubalgebra R A :=
{ p with
mul_mem' := h_mul _ _ }
@[simp]
theorem mem_toNonUnitalSubalgebra {p : Submodule R A} {h_mul} {x} :
x ∈ p.toNonUnitalSubalgebra h_mul ↔ x ∈ p :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toNonUnitalSubalgebra (p : Submodule R A) (h_mul) :
(p.toNonUnitalSubalgebra h_mul : Set A) = p :=
rfl
theorem toNonUnitalSubalgebra_mk (p : Submodule R A) hmul :
p.toNonUnitalSubalgebra hmul =
NonUnitalSubalgebra.mk ⟨⟨⟨p, p.add_mem⟩, p.zero_mem⟩, hmul _ _⟩ p.smul_mem' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toNonUnitalSubalgebra_toSubmodule (p : Submodule R A) (h_mul) :
(p.toNonUnitalSubalgebra h_mul).toSubmodule = p :=
SetLike.coe_injective rfl
@[simp]
theorem _root_.NonUnitalSubalgebra.toSubmodule_toNonUnitalSubalgebra (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :
(S.toSubmodule.toNonUnitalSubalgebra fun _ _ => mul_mem (s := S)) = S :=
SetLike.coe_injective rfl
end Submodule
namespace NonUnitalAlgHom
variable {F : Type v'} {R' : Type u'} {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} {C : Type w'}
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [Module R B]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring C] [Module R C] [FunLike F A B] [NonUnitalAlgHomClass F R A B]
/-- Range of an `NonUnitalAlgHom` as a non-unital subalgebra. -/
protected def range (φ : F) : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B where
toNonUnitalSubsemiring := NonUnitalRingHom.srange (φ : A →ₙ+* B)
smul_mem' := fun r a => by rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩; exact ⟨r • a, map_smul φ r a⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_range (φ : F) {y : B} :
y ∈ (NonUnitalAlgHom.range φ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) ↔ ∃ x : A, φ x = y :=
NonUnitalRingHom.mem_srange
theorem mem_range_self (φ : F) (x : A) :
φ x ∈ (NonUnitalAlgHom.range φ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) :=
(NonUnitalAlgHom.mem_range φ).2 ⟨x, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_range (φ : F) :
((NonUnitalAlgHom.range φ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) : Set B) = Set.range (φ : A → B) := by
ext
rw [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_range]
rfl
theorem range_comp (f : A →ₙₐ[R] B) (g : B →ₙₐ[R] C) :
NonUnitalAlgHom.range (g.comp f) = (NonUnitalAlgHom.range f).map g :=
SetLike.coe_injective (Set.range_comp g f)
theorem range_comp_le_range (f : A →ₙₐ[R] B) (g : B →ₙₐ[R] C) :
NonUnitalAlgHom.range (g.comp f) ≤ NonUnitalAlgHom.range g :=
SetLike.coe_mono (Set.range_comp_subset_range f g)
/-- Restrict the codomain of a non-unital algebra homomorphism. -/
def codRestrict (f : F) (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) (hf : ∀ x, f x ∈ S) : A →ₙₐ[R] S :=
{ NonUnitalRingHom.codRestrict (f : A →ₙ+* B) S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring hf with
map_smul' := fun r a => Subtype.ext <| map_smul f r a }
@[simp]
theorem subtype_comp_codRestrict (f : F) (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) (hf : ∀ x : A, f x ∈ S) :
(NonUnitalSubalgebraClass.subtype S).comp (NonUnitalAlgHom.codRestrict f S hf) = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_codRestrict (f : F) (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) (hf : ∀ x, f x ∈ S) (x : A) :
↑(NonUnitalAlgHom.codRestrict f S hf x) = f x :=
rfl
theorem injective_codRestrict (f : F) (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) (hf : ∀ x : A, f x ∈ S) :
Function.Injective (NonUnitalAlgHom.codRestrict f S hf) ↔ Function.Injective f :=
⟨fun H _x _y hxy => H <| Subtype.eq hxy, fun H _x _y hxy => H (congr_arg Subtype.val hxy :)⟩
/-- Restrict the codomain of an `NonUnitalAlgHom` `f` to `f.range`.
This is the bundled version of `Set.rangeFactorization`. -/
abbrev rangeRestrict (f : F) : A →ₙₐ[R] (NonUnitalAlgHom.range f : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) :=
NonUnitalAlgHom.codRestrict f (NonUnitalAlgHom.range f) (NonUnitalAlgHom.mem_range_self f)
/-- The equalizer of two non-unital `R`-algebra homomorphisms -/
def equalizer (ϕ ψ : F) : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A where
carrier := {a | (ϕ a : B) = ψ a}
zero_mem' := by rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, map_zero, map_zero]
add_mem' {x y} (hx : ϕ x = ψ x) (hy : ϕ y = ψ y) := by
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, map_add, map_add, hx, hy]
mul_mem' {x y} (hx : ϕ x = ψ x) (hy : ϕ y = ψ y) := by
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, map_mul, map_mul, hx, hy]
smul_mem' r x (hx : ϕ x = ψ x) := by rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, map_smul, map_smul, hx]
@[simp]
theorem mem_equalizer (φ ψ : F) (x : A) :
x ∈ NonUnitalAlgHom.equalizer φ ψ ↔ φ x = ψ x :=
Iff.rfl
/-- The range of a morphism of algebras is a fintype, if the domain is a fintype.
Note that this instance can cause a diamond with `Subtype.fintype` if `B` is also a fintype. -/
instance fintypeRange [Fintype A] [DecidableEq B] (φ : F) :
Fintype (NonUnitalAlgHom.range φ) :=
Set.fintypeRange φ
end NonUnitalAlgHom
namespace NonUnitalAlgebra
variable {F : Type*} (R : Type u) {A : Type v} {B : Type w}
variable [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A]
@[simp]
lemma span_eq_toSubmodule (s : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :
Submodule.span R (s : Set A) = s.toSubmodule := by
simp [SetLike.ext'_iff, Submodule.coe_span_eq_self]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [Module R B]
variable [FunLike F A B] [NonUnitalAlgHomClass F R A B]
section IsScalarTower
variable [IsScalarTower R A A] [SMulCommClass R A A]
/-- The minimal non-unital subalgebra that includes `s`. -/
def adjoin (s : Set A) : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A :=
{ Submodule.span R (NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure s : Set A) with
mul_mem' :=
@fun a b (ha : a ∈ Submodule.span R (NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure s : Set A))
(hb : b ∈ Submodule.span R (NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure s : Set A)) =>
show a * b ∈ Submodule.span R (NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure s : Set A) by
refine Submodule.span_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ha
· refine Submodule.span_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ hb
· exact fun x (hx : x ∈ NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure s) y
(hy : y ∈ NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure s) => Submodule.subset_span (mul_mem hy hx)
· exact fun x _hx => (mul_zero x).symm ▸ Submodule.zero_mem _
· exact fun x y _ _ hx hy z hz => (mul_add z x y).symm ▸ add_mem (hx z hz) (hy z hz)
· exact fun r x _ hx y hy =>
(mul_smul_comm r y x).symm ▸ SMulMemClass.smul_mem r (hx y hy)
· exact (zero_mul b).symm ▸ Submodule.zero_mem _
· exact fun x y _ _ => (add_mul x y b).symm ▸ add_mem
· exact fun r x _ hx => (smul_mul_assoc r x b).symm ▸ SMulMemClass.smul_mem r hx }
theorem adjoin_toSubmodule (s : Set A) :
(adjoin R s).toSubmodule = Submodule.span R (NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure s : Set A) :=
rfl
@[aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [SetLike])]
theorem subset_adjoin {s : Set A} : s ⊆ adjoin R s :=
NonUnitalSubsemiring.subset_closure.trans Submodule.subset_span
theorem self_mem_adjoin_singleton (x : A) : x ∈ adjoin R ({x} : Set A) :=
NonUnitalAlgebra.subset_adjoin R (Set.mem_singleton x)
variable {R}
protected theorem gc : GaloisConnection (adjoin R : Set A → NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (↑) :=
fun s S =>
⟨fun H => (NonUnitalSubsemiring.subset_closure.trans Submodule.subset_span).trans H,
fun H => show Submodule.span R _ ≤ S.toSubmodule from Submodule.span_le.mpr <|
show NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure s ≤ S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring from
NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure_le.2 H⟩
/-- Galois insertion between `adjoin` and `Subtype.val`. -/
protected def gi : GaloisInsertion (adjoin R : Set A → NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (↑) where
choice s hs := (adjoin R s).copy s <| le_antisymm (NonUnitalAlgebra.gc.le_u_l s) hs
gc := NonUnitalAlgebra.gc
le_l_u S := (NonUnitalAlgebra.gc (S : Set A) (adjoin R S)).1 <| le_rfl
choice_eq _ _ := NonUnitalSubalgebra.copy_eq _ _ _
instance : CompleteLattice (NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :=
GaloisInsertion.liftCompleteLattice NonUnitalAlgebra.gi
theorem adjoin_le {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {s : Set A} (hs : s ⊆ S) : adjoin R s ≤ S :=
NonUnitalAlgebra.gc.l_le hs
theorem adjoin_le_iff {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {s : Set A} : adjoin R s ≤ S ↔ s ⊆ S :=
NonUnitalAlgebra.gc _ _
theorem adjoin_union (s t : Set A) : adjoin R (s ∪ t) = adjoin R s ⊔ adjoin R t :=
(NonUnitalAlgebra.gc : GaloisConnection _ ((↑) : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A → Set A)).l_sup
lemma adjoin_eq (s : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : adjoin R (s : Set A) = s :=
le_antisymm (adjoin_le le_rfl) (subset_adjoin R)
/-- If some predicate holds for all `x ∈ (s : Set A)` and this predicate is closed under the
`algebraMap`, addition, multiplication and star operations, then it holds for `a ∈ adjoin R s`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem adjoin_induction {s : Set A} {p : (x : A) → x ∈ adjoin R s → Prop}
(mem : ∀ (x) (hx : x ∈ s), p x (subset_adjoin R hx))
(add : ∀ x y hx hy, p x hx → p y hy → p (x + y) (add_mem hx hy)) (zero : p 0 (zero_mem _))
(mul : ∀ x y hx hy, p x hx → p y hy → p (x * y) (mul_mem hx hy))
(smul : ∀ r x hx, p x hx → p (r • x) (SMulMemClass.smul_mem r hx))
{x} (hx : x ∈ adjoin R s) : p x hx :=
let S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A :=
{ carrier := { x | ∃ hx, p x hx }
mul_mem' := (Exists.elim · fun _ ha ↦ (Exists.elim · fun _ hb ↦ ⟨_, mul _ _ _ _ ha hb⟩))
add_mem' := (Exists.elim · fun _ ha ↦ (Exists.elim · fun _ hb ↦ ⟨_, add _ _ _ _ ha hb⟩))
smul_mem' := fun r ↦ (Exists.elim · fun _ hb ↦ ⟨_, smul r _ _ hb⟩)
zero_mem' := ⟨_, zero⟩ }
adjoin_le (S := S) (fun y hy ↦ ⟨subset_adjoin R hy, mem y hy⟩) hx |>.elim fun _ ↦ id
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem adjoin_induction₂ {s : Set A} {p : ∀ x y, x ∈ adjoin R s → y ∈ adjoin R s → Prop}
(mem_mem : ∀ (x) (y) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s), p x y (subset_adjoin R hx) (subset_adjoin R hy))
(zero_left : ∀ x hx, p 0 x (zero_mem _) hx) (zero_right : ∀ x hx, p x 0 hx (zero_mem _))
(add_left : ∀ x y z hx hy hz, p x z hx hz → p y z hy hz → p (x + y) z (add_mem hx hy) hz)
(add_right : ∀ x y z hx hy hz, p x y hx hy → p x z hx hz → p x (y + z) hx (add_mem hy hz))
(mul_left : ∀ x y z hx hy hz, p x z hx hz → p y z hy hz → p (x * y) z (mul_mem hx hy) hz)
(mul_right : ∀ x y z hx hy hz, p x y hx hy → p x z hx hz → p x (y * z) hx (mul_mem hy hz))
(smul_left : ∀ r x y hx hy, p x y hx hy → p (r • x) y (SMulMemClass.smul_mem r hx) hy)
(smul_right : ∀ r x y hx hy, p x y hx hy → p x (r • y) hx (SMulMemClass.smul_mem r hy))
{x y : A} (hx : x ∈ adjoin R s) (hy : y ∈ adjoin R s) :
p x y hx hy := by
induction hy using adjoin_induction with
| mem z hz =>
induction hx using adjoin_induction with
| mem _ h => exact mem_mem _ _ h hz
| zero => exact zero_left _ _
| mul _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => exact mul_left _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂
| add _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => exact add_left _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂
| smul _ _ _ h => exact smul_left _ _ _ _ _ h
| zero => exact zero_right x hx
| mul _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => exact mul_right _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂
| add _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => exact add_right _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂
| smul _ _ _ h => exact smul_right _ _ _ _ _ h
open Submodule in
lemma adjoin_eq_span (s : Set A) : (adjoin R s).toSubmodule = span R (Subsemigroup.closure s) := by
apply le_antisymm
· intro x hx
induction hx using adjoin_induction with
| mem x hx => exact subset_span <| Subsemigroup.subset_closure hx
| add x y _ _ hpx hpy => exact add_mem hpx hpy
| zero => exact zero_mem _
| mul x y _ _ hpx hpy =>
apply span_induction₂ ?Hs (by simp) (by simp) ?Hadd_l ?Hadd_r ?Hsmul_l ?Hsmul_r hpx hpy
case Hs => exact fun x y hx hy ↦ subset_span <| mul_mem hx hy
case Hadd_l => exact fun x y z _ _ _ hxz hyz ↦ by simpa [add_mul] using add_mem hxz hyz
case Hadd_r => exact fun x y z _ _ _ hxz hyz ↦ by simpa [mul_add] using add_mem hxz hyz
case Hsmul_l => exact fun r x y _ _ hxy ↦ by simpa [smul_mul_assoc] using smul_mem _ _ hxy
case Hsmul_r => exact fun r x y _ _ hxy ↦ by simpa [mul_smul_comm] using smul_mem _ _ hxy
| smul r x _ hpx => exact smul_mem _ _ hpx
· apply span_le.2 _
show Subsemigroup.closure s ≤ (adjoin R s).toSubsemigroup
exact Subsemigroup.closure_le.2 (subset_adjoin R)
variable (R A)
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_empty : adjoin R (∅ : Set A) = ⊥ :=
show adjoin R ⊥ = ⊥ by apply GaloisConnection.l_bot; exact NonUnitalAlgebra.gc
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_univ : adjoin R (Set.univ : Set A) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 fun _x hx => subset_adjoin R hx
open NonUnitalSubalgebra in
lemma _root_.NonUnitalAlgHom.map_adjoin [IsScalarTower R B B] [SMulCommClass R B B]
(f : F) (s : Set A) : map f (adjoin R s) = adjoin R (f '' s) :=
Set.image_preimage.l_comm_of_u_comm (gc_map_comap f) NonUnitalAlgebra.gi.gc
NonUnitalAlgebra.gi.gc fun _t => rfl
open NonUnitalSubalgebra in
@[simp]
lemma _root_.NonUnitalAlgHom.map_adjoin_singleton [IsScalarTower R B B] [SMulCommClass R B B]
(f : F) (x : A) : map f (adjoin R {x}) = adjoin R {f x} := by
simp [NonUnitalAlgHom.map_adjoin]
variable {R A}
@[simp]
theorem coe_top : (↑(⊤ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : Set A) = Set.univ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_top {x : A} : x ∈ (⊤ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :=
Set.mem_univ x
@[simp]
theorem top_toSubmodule : (⊤ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A).toSubmodule = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_toNonUnitalSubsemiring : (⊤ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A).toNonUnitalSubsemiring = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_toSubring {R A : Type*} [CommRing R] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing A] [Module R A]
[IsScalarTower R A A] [SMulCommClass R A A] :
(⊤ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A).toNonUnitalSubring = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toSubmodule_eq_top {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} : S.toSubmodule = ⊤ ↔ S = ⊤ :=
NonUnitalSubalgebra.toSubmodule'.injective.eq_iff' top_toSubmodule
@[simp]
theorem toNonUnitalSubsemiring_eq_top {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} :
S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring = ⊤ ↔ S = ⊤ :=
NonUnitalSubalgebra.toNonUnitalSubsemiring_injective.eq_iff' top_toNonUnitalSubsemiring
@[simp]
theorem to_subring_eq_top {R A : Type*} [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A]
{S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} : S.toNonUnitalSubring = ⊤ ↔ S = ⊤ :=
NonUnitalSubalgebra.toNonUnitalSubring_injective.eq_iff' top_toSubring
theorem mem_sup_left {S T : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} : ∀ {x : A}, x ∈ S → x ∈ S ⊔ T := by
rw [← SetLike.le_def]
exact le_sup_left
theorem mem_sup_right {S T : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} : ∀ {x : A}, x ∈ T → x ∈ S ⊔ T := by
rw [← SetLike.le_def]
exact le_sup_right
theorem mul_mem_sup {S T : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {x y : A} (hx : x ∈ S) (hy : y ∈ T) :
x * y ∈ S ⊔ T :=
mul_mem (mem_sup_left hx) (mem_sup_right hy)
theorem map_sup [IsScalarTower R B B] [SMulCommClass R B B]
(f : F) (S T : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :
((S ⊔ T).map f : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) = S.map f ⊔ T.map f :=
(NonUnitalSubalgebra.gc_map_comap f).l_sup
theorem map_inf [IsScalarTower R B B] [SMulCommClass R B B]
(f : F) (hf : Function.Injective f) (S T : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :
((S ⊓ T).map f : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) = S.map f ⊓ T.map f :=
SetLike.coe_injective (Set.image_inter hf)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inf (S T : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : (↑(S ⊓ T) : Set A) = (S : Set A) ∩ T :=
| rfl
| Mathlib/Algebra/Algebra/NonUnitalSubalgebra.lean | 760 | 761 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Indicator
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.InjSurj
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.FastInstance
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.Defs
/-!
# Type of functions with finite support
For any type `α` and any type `M` with zero, we define the type `Finsupp α M` (notation: `α →₀ M`)
of finitely supported functions from `α` to `M`, i.e. the functions which are zero everywhere
on `α` except on a finite set.
Functions with finite support are used (at least) in the following parts of the library:
* `MonoidAlgebra R M` and `AddMonoidAlgebra R M` are defined as `M →₀ R`;
* polynomials and multivariate polynomials are defined as `AddMonoidAlgebra`s, hence they use
`Finsupp` under the hood;
* the linear combination of a family of vectors `v i` with coefficients `f i` (as used, e.g., to
define linearly independent family `LinearIndependent`) is defined as a map
`Finsupp.linearCombination : (ι → M) → (ι →₀ R) →ₗ[R] M`.
Some other constructions are naturally equivalent to `α →₀ M` with some `α` and `M` but are defined
in a different way in the library:
* `Multiset α ≃+ α →₀ ℕ`;
* `FreeAbelianGroup α ≃+ α →₀ ℤ`.
Most of the theory assumes that the range is a commutative additive monoid. This gives us the big
sum operator as a powerful way to construct `Finsupp` elements, which is defined in
`Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Finsupp.Basic`.
Many constructions based on `α →₀ M` are `def`s rather than `abbrev`s to avoid reusing unwanted type
class instances. E.g., `MonoidAlgebra`, `AddMonoidAlgebra`, and types based on these two have
non-pointwise multiplication.
## Main declarations
* `Finsupp`: The type of finitely supported functions from `α` to `β`.
* `Finsupp.onFinset`: The restriction of a function to a `Finset` as a `Finsupp`.
* `Finsupp.mapRange`: Composition of a `ZeroHom` with a `Finsupp`.
* `Finsupp.embDomain`: Maps the domain of a `Finsupp` by an embedding.
* `Finsupp.zipWith`: Postcomposition of two `Finsupp`s with a function `f` such that `f 0 0 = 0`.
## Notations
This file adds `α →₀ M` as a global notation for `Finsupp α M`.
We also use the following convention for `Type*` variables in this file
* `α`, `β`, `γ`: types with no additional structure that appear as the first argument to `Finsupp`
somewhere in the statement;
* `ι` : an auxiliary index type;
* `M`, `M'`, `N`, `P`: types with `Zero` or `(Add)(Comm)Monoid` structure; `M` is also used
for a (semi)module over a (semi)ring.
* `G`, `H`: groups (commutative or not, multiplicative or additive);
* `R`, `S`: (semi)rings.
## Implementation notes
This file is a `noncomputable theory` and uses classical logic throughout.
## TODO
* Expand the list of definitions and important lemmas to the module docstring.
-/
assert_not_exists CompleteLattice Submonoid
noncomputable section
open Finset Function
variable {α β γ ι M M' N P G H R S : Type*}
/-- `Finsupp α M`, denoted `α →₀ M`, is the type of functions `f : α → M` such that
`f x = 0` for all but finitely many `x`. -/
structure Finsupp (α : Type*) (M : Type*) [Zero M] where
/-- The support of a finitely supported function (aka `Finsupp`). -/
support : Finset α
/-- The underlying function of a bundled finitely supported function (aka `Finsupp`). -/
toFun : α → M
/-- The witness that the support of a `Finsupp` is indeed the exact locus where its
underlying function is nonzero. -/
mem_support_toFun : ∀ a, a ∈ support ↔ toFun a ≠ 0
@[inherit_doc]
infixr:25 " →₀ " => Finsupp
namespace Finsupp
/-! ### Basic declarations about `Finsupp` -/
section Basic
variable [Zero M]
instance instFunLike : FunLike (α →₀ M) α M :=
⟨toFun, by
rintro ⟨s, f, hf⟩ ⟨t, g, hg⟩ (rfl : f = g)
congr
ext a
exact (hf _).trans (hg _).symm⟩
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : α →₀ M} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
lemma ne_iff {f g : α →₀ M} : f ≠ g ↔ ∃ a, f a ≠ g a := DFunLike.ne_iff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mk (f : α → M) (s : Finset α) (h : ∀ a, a ∈ s ↔ f a ≠ 0) : ⇑(⟨s, f, h⟩ : α →₀ M) = f :=
rfl
instance instZero : Zero (α →₀ M) :=
⟨⟨∅, 0, fun _ => ⟨fun h ↦ (not_mem_empty _ h).elim, fun H => (H rfl).elim⟩⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : ⇑(0 : α →₀ M) = 0 := rfl
theorem zero_apply {a : α} : (0 : α →₀ M) a = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : (0 : α →₀ M).support = ∅ :=
rfl
instance instInhabited : Inhabited (α →₀ M) :=
⟨0⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_support_iff {f : α →₀ M} : ∀ {a : α}, a ∈ f.support ↔ f a ≠ 0 :=
@(f.mem_support_toFun)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem fun_support_eq (f : α →₀ M) : Function.support f = f.support :=
Set.ext fun _x => mem_support_iff.symm
theorem not_mem_support_iff {f : α →₀ M} {a} : a ∉ f.support ↔ f a = 0 :=
not_iff_comm.1 mem_support_iff.symm
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_zero {f : α →₀ M} : (f : α → M) = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, DFunLike.coe_fn_eq]
theorem ext_iff' {f g : α →₀ M} : f = g ↔ f.support = g.support ∧ ∀ x ∈ f.support, f x = g x :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, fun _ _ => rfl⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ =>
ext fun a => by
classical
exact if h : a ∈ f.support then h₂ a h else by
have hf : f a = 0 := not_mem_support_iff.1 h
have hg : g a = 0 := by rwa [h₁, not_mem_support_iff] at h
rw [hf, hg]⟩
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty {f : α →₀ M} : f.support = ∅ ↔ f = 0 :=
mod_cast @Function.support_eq_empty_iff _ _ _ f
theorem support_nonempty_iff {f : α →₀ M} : f.support.Nonempty ↔ f ≠ 0 := by
simp only [Finsupp.support_eq_empty, Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne]
theorem card_support_eq_zero {f : α →₀ M} : #f.support = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by simp
instance instDecidableEq [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq M] : DecidableEq (α →₀ M) := fun f g =>
decidable_of_iff (f.support = g.support ∧ ∀ a ∈ f.support, f a = g a) ext_iff'.symm
theorem finite_support (f : α →₀ M) : Set.Finite (Function.support f) :=
f.fun_support_eq.symm ▸ f.support.finite_toSet
theorem support_subset_iff {s : Set α} {f : α →₀ M} :
↑f.support ⊆ s ↔ ∀ a ∉ s, f a = 0 := by
simp only [Set.subset_def, mem_coe, mem_support_iff]; exact forall_congr' fun a => not_imp_comm
/-- Given `Finite α`, `equivFunOnFinite` is the `Equiv` between `α →₀ β` and `α → β`.
(All functions on a finite type are finitely supported.) -/
@[simps]
def equivFunOnFinite [Finite α] : (α →₀ M) ≃ (α → M) where
toFun := (⇑)
invFun f := mk (Function.support f).toFinite.toFinset f fun _a => Set.Finite.mem_toFinset _
left_inv _f := ext fun _x => rfl
right_inv _f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem equivFunOnFinite_symm_coe {α} [Finite α] (f : α →₀ M) : equivFunOnFinite.symm f = f :=
equivFunOnFinite.symm_apply_apply f
@[simp]
lemma coe_equivFunOnFinite_symm {α} [Finite α] (f : α → M) : ⇑(equivFunOnFinite.symm f) = f := rfl
/--
If `α` has a unique term, the type of finitely supported functions `α →₀ β` is equivalent to `β`.
-/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def _root_.Equiv.finsuppUnique {ι : Type*} [Unique ι] : (ι →₀ M) ≃ M :=
Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite.trans (Equiv.funUnique ι M)
@[ext]
theorem unique_ext [Unique α] {f g : α →₀ M} (h : f default = g default) : f = g :=
ext fun a => by rwa [Unique.eq_default a]
end Basic
/-! ### Declarations about `onFinset` -/
section OnFinset
variable [Zero M]
/-- `Finsupp.onFinset s f hf` is the finsupp function representing `f` restricted to the finset `s`.
The function must be `0` outside of `s`. Use this when the set needs to be filtered anyways,
otherwise a better set representation is often available. -/
def onFinset (s : Finset α) (f : α → M) (hf : ∀ a, f a ≠ 0 → a ∈ s) : α →₀ M where
support :=
haveI := Classical.decEq M
{a ∈ s | f a ≠ 0}
toFun := f
mem_support_toFun := by classical simpa
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_onFinset (s : Finset α) (f : α → M) (hf) : onFinset s f hf = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem onFinset_apply {s : Finset α} {f : α → M} {hf a} : (onFinset s f hf : α →₀ M) a = f a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_onFinset_subset {s : Finset α} {f : α → M} {hf} :
(onFinset s f hf).support ⊆ s := by
classical convert filter_subset (f · ≠ 0) s
theorem mem_support_onFinset {s : Finset α} {f : α → M} (hf : ∀ a : α, f a ≠ 0 → a ∈ s) {a : α} :
a ∈ (Finsupp.onFinset s f hf).support ↔ f a ≠ 0 := by
rw [Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Finsupp.onFinset_apply]
theorem support_onFinset [DecidableEq M] {s : Finset α} {f : α → M}
(hf : ∀ a : α, f a ≠ 0 → a ∈ s) :
(Finsupp.onFinset s f hf).support = {a ∈ s | f a ≠ 0} := by
dsimp [onFinset]; congr
end OnFinset
section OfSupportFinite
variable [Zero M]
/-- The natural `Finsupp` induced by the function `f` given that it has finite support. -/
noncomputable def ofSupportFinite (f : α → M) (hf : (Function.support f).Finite) : α →₀ M where
support := hf.toFinset
toFun := f
mem_support_toFun _ := hf.mem_toFinset
theorem ofSupportFinite_coe {f : α → M} {hf : (Function.support f).Finite} :
(ofSupportFinite f hf : α → M) = f :=
rfl
instance instCanLift : CanLift (α → M) (α →₀ M) (⇑) fun f => (Function.support f).Finite where
prf f hf := ⟨ofSupportFinite f hf, rfl⟩
end OfSupportFinite
/-! ### Declarations about `mapRange` -/
section MapRange
variable [Zero M] [Zero N] [Zero P]
/-- The composition of `f : M → N` and `g : α →₀ M` is `mapRange f hf g : α →₀ N`,
which is well-defined when `f 0 = 0`.
This preserves the structure on `f`, and exists in various bundled forms for when `f` is itself
bundled (defined in `Mathlib/Data/Finsupp/Basic.lean`):
* `Finsupp.mapRange.equiv`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.zeroHom`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.addMonoidHom`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.addEquiv`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.linearMap`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.linearEquiv`
-/
def mapRange (f : M → N) (hf : f 0 = 0) (g : α →₀ M) : α →₀ N :=
onFinset g.support (f ∘ g) fun a => by
rw [mem_support_iff, not_imp_not]; exact fun H => (congr_arg f H).trans hf
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_apply {f : M → N} {hf : f 0 = 0} {g : α →₀ M} {a : α} :
mapRange f hf g a = f (g a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_zero {f : M → N} {hf : f 0 = 0} : mapRange f hf (0 : α →₀ M) = 0 :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [hf, zero_apply, mapRange_apply]
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_id (g : α →₀ M) : mapRange id rfl g = g :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem mapRange_comp (f : N → P) (hf : f 0 = 0) (f₂ : M → N) (hf₂ : f₂ 0 = 0) (h : (f ∘ f₂) 0 = 0)
(g : α →₀ M) : mapRange (f ∘ f₂) h g = mapRange f hf (mapRange f₂ hf₂ g) :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
lemma mapRange_mapRange (e₁ : N → P) (e₂ : M → N) (he₁ he₂) (f : α →₀ M) :
mapRange e₁ he₁ (mapRange e₂ he₂ f) = mapRange (e₁ ∘ e₂) (by simp [*]) f := ext fun _ ↦ rfl
theorem support_mapRange {f : M → N} {hf : f 0 = 0} {g : α →₀ M} :
(mapRange f hf g).support ⊆ g.support :=
support_onFinset_subset
theorem support_mapRange_of_injective {e : M → N} (he0 : e 0 = 0) (f : ι →₀ M)
(he : Function.Injective e) : (Finsupp.mapRange e he0 f).support = f.support := by
ext
simp only [Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Ne, Finsupp.mapRange_apply]
exact he.ne_iff' he0
lemma range_mapRange (e : M → N) (he₀ : e 0 = 0) :
Set.range (Finsupp.mapRange (α := α) e he₀) = {g | ∀ i, g i ∈ Set.range e} := by
ext g
simp only [Set.mem_range, Set.mem_setOf]
constructor
· rintro ⟨g, rfl⟩ i
simp
· intro h
classical
choose f h using h
use onFinset g.support (Set.indicator g.support f) (by aesop)
ext i
simp only [mapRange_apply, onFinset_apply, Set.indicator_apply]
split_ifs <;> simp_all
/-- `Finsupp.mapRange` of a injective function is injective. -/
lemma mapRange_injective (e : M → N) (he₀ : e 0 = 0) (he : Injective e) :
Injective (Finsupp.mapRange (α := α) e he₀) := by
intro a b h
rw [Finsupp.ext_iff] at h ⊢
simpa only [mapRange_apply, he.eq_iff] using h
/-- `Finsupp.mapRange` of a surjective function is surjective. -/
lemma mapRange_surjective (e : M → N) (he₀ : e 0 = 0) (he : Surjective e) :
Surjective (Finsupp.mapRange (α := α) e he₀) := by
rw [← Set.range_eq_univ, range_mapRange, he.range_eq]
simp
end MapRange
/-! ### Declarations about `embDomain` -/
section EmbDomain
variable [Zero M] [Zero N]
/-- Given `f : α ↪ β` and `v : α →₀ M`, `Finsupp.embDomain f v : β →₀ M`
is the finitely supported function whose value at `f a : β` is `v a`.
For a `b : β` outside the range of `f`, it is zero. -/
def embDomain (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) : β →₀ M where
support := v.support.map f
toFun a₂ :=
haveI := Classical.decEq β
if h : a₂ ∈ v.support.map f then
v
(v.support.choose (fun a₁ => f a₁ = a₂)
(by
rcases Finset.mem_map.1 h with ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact ExistsUnique.intro a ⟨ha, rfl⟩ fun b ⟨_, hb⟩ => f.injective hb))
else 0
mem_support_toFun a₂ := by
dsimp
split_ifs with h
· simp only [h, true_iff, Ne]
rw [← not_mem_support_iff, not_not]
classical apply Finset.choose_mem
· simp only [h, Ne, ne_self_iff_false, not_true_eq_false]
@[simp]
theorem support_embDomain (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) : (embDomain f v).support = v.support.map f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_zero (f : α ↪ β) : (embDomain f 0 : β →₀ M) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_apply (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) (a : α) : embDomain f v (f a) = v a := by
classical
simp_rw [embDomain, coe_mk, mem_map']
split_ifs with h
· refine congr_arg (v : α → M) (f.inj' ?_)
exact Finset.choose_property (fun a₁ => f a₁ = f a) _ _
· exact (not_mem_support_iff.1 h).symm
theorem embDomain_notin_range (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) (a : β) (h : a ∉ Set.range f) :
embDomain f v a = 0 := by
classical
refine dif_neg (mt (fun h => ?_) h)
rcases Finset.mem_map.1 h with ⟨a, _h, rfl⟩
exact Set.mem_range_self a
theorem embDomain_injective (f : α ↪ β) : Function.Injective (embDomain f : (α →₀ M) → β →₀ M) :=
fun l₁ l₂ h => ext fun a => by simpa only [embDomain_apply] using DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h (f a)
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_inj {f : α ↪ β} {l₁ l₂ : α →₀ M} : embDomain f l₁ = embDomain f l₂ ↔ l₁ = l₂ :=
(embDomain_injective f).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_eq_zero {f : α ↪ β} {l : α →₀ M} : embDomain f l = 0 ↔ l = 0 :=
(embDomain_injective f).eq_iff' <| embDomain_zero f
theorem embDomain_mapRange (f : α ↪ β) (g : M → N) (p : α →₀ M) (hg : g 0 = 0) :
embDomain f (mapRange g hg p) = mapRange g hg (embDomain f p) := by
ext a
by_cases h : a ∈ Set.range f
· rcases h with ⟨a', rfl⟩
rw [mapRange_apply, embDomain_apply, embDomain_apply, mapRange_apply]
· rw [mapRange_apply, embDomain_notin_range, embDomain_notin_range, ← hg] <;> assumption
end EmbDomain
/-! ### Declarations about `zipWith` -/
section ZipWith
variable [Zero M] [Zero N] [Zero P]
/-- Given finitely supported functions `g₁ : α →₀ M` and `g₂ : α →₀ N` and function `f : M → N → P`,
`Finsupp.zipWith f hf g₁ g₂` is the finitely supported function `α →₀ P` satisfying
`zipWith f hf g₁ g₂ a = f (g₁ a) (g₂ a)`, which is well-defined when `f 0 0 = 0`. -/
def zipWith (f : M → N → P) (hf : f 0 0 = 0) (g₁ : α →₀ M) (g₂ : α →₀ N) : α →₀ P :=
onFinset
(haveI := Classical.decEq α; g₁.support ∪ g₂.support)
(fun a => f (g₁ a) (g₂ a))
fun a (H : f _ _ ≠ 0) => by
classical
rw [mem_union, mem_support_iff, mem_support_iff, ← not_and_or]
rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩; rw [h₁, h₂] at H; exact H hf
@[simp]
theorem zipWith_apply {f : M → N → P} {hf : f 0 0 = 0} {g₁ : α →₀ M} {g₂ : α →₀ N} {a : α} :
zipWith f hf g₁ g₂ a = f (g₁ a) (g₂ a) :=
rfl
theorem support_zipWith [D : DecidableEq α] {f : M → N → P} {hf : f 0 0 = 0} {g₁ : α →₀ M}
{g₂ : α →₀ N} : (zipWith f hf g₁ g₂).support ⊆ g₁.support ∪ g₂.support := by
convert support_onFinset_subset
end ZipWith
/-! ### Additive monoid structure on `α →₀ M` -/
section AddZeroClass
variable [AddZeroClass M]
instance instAdd : Add (α →₀ M) :=
⟨zipWith (· + ·) (add_zero 0)⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_add (f g : α →₀ M) : ⇑(f + g) = f + g := rfl
theorem add_apply (g₁ g₂ : α →₀ M) (a : α) : (g₁ + g₂) a = g₁ a + g₂ a :=
rfl
theorem support_add [DecidableEq α] {g₁ g₂ : α →₀ M} :
(g₁ + g₂).support ⊆ g₁.support ∪ g₂.support :=
support_zipWith
theorem support_add_eq [DecidableEq α] {g₁ g₂ : α →₀ M} (h : Disjoint g₁.support g₂.support) :
(g₁ + g₂).support = g₁.support ∪ g₂.support :=
le_antisymm support_zipWith fun a ha =>
(Finset.mem_union.1 ha).elim
(fun ha => by
have : a ∉ g₂.support := disjoint_left.1 h ha
simp only [mem_support_iff, not_not] at *; simpa only [add_apply, this, add_zero] )
fun ha => by
have : a ∉ g₁.support := disjoint_right.1 h ha
simp only [mem_support_iff, not_not] at *; simpa only [add_apply, this, zero_add]
instance instAddZeroClass : AddZeroClass (α →₀ M) :=
fast_instance% DFunLike.coe_injective.addZeroClass _ coe_zero coe_add
instance instIsLeftCancelAdd [IsLeftCancelAdd M] : IsLeftCancelAdd (α →₀ M) where
add_left_cancel _ _ _ h := ext fun x => add_left_cancel <| DFunLike.congr_fun h x
/-- When ι is finite and M is an AddMonoid,
then Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite gives an AddEquiv -/
noncomputable def addEquivFunOnFinite {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] :
(ι →₀ M) ≃+ (ι → M) where
__ := Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite
map_add' _ _ := rfl
/-- AddEquiv between (ι →₀ M) and M, when ι has a unique element -/
noncomputable def _root_.AddEquiv.finsuppUnique {ι : Type*} [Unique ι] :
(ι →₀ M) ≃+ M where
__ := Equiv.finsuppUnique
map_add' _ _ := rfl
instance instIsRightCancelAdd [IsRightCancelAdd M] : IsRightCancelAdd (α →₀ M) where
add_right_cancel _ _ _ h := ext fun x => add_right_cancel <| DFunLike.congr_fun h x
instance instIsCancelAdd [IsCancelAdd M] : IsCancelAdd (α →₀ M) where
/-- Evaluation of a function `f : α →₀ M` at a point as an additive monoid homomorphism.
See `Finsupp.lapply` in `Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Finsupp/Defs.lean` for the stronger version as a
linear map. -/
@[simps apply]
def applyAddHom (a : α) : (α →₀ M) →+ M where
toFun g := g a
map_zero' := zero_apply
map_add' _ _ := add_apply _ _ _
/-- Coercion from a `Finsupp` to a function type is an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def coeFnAddHom : (α →₀ M) →+ α → M where
toFun := (⇑)
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
theorem mapRange_add [AddZeroClass N] {f : M → N} {hf : f 0 = 0}
(hf' : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y) (v₁ v₂ : α →₀ M) :
mapRange f hf (v₁ + v₂) = mapRange f hf v₁ + mapRange f hf v₂ :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [hf', add_apply, mapRange_apply]
theorem mapRange_add' [AddZeroClass N] [FunLike β M N] [AddMonoidHomClass β M N]
{f : β} (v₁ v₂ : α →₀ M) :
mapRange f (map_zero f) (v₁ + v₂) = mapRange f (map_zero f) v₁ + mapRange f (map_zero f) v₂ :=
mapRange_add (map_add f) v₁ v₂
/-- Bundle `Finsupp.embDomain f` as an additive map from `α →₀ M` to `β →₀ M`. -/
@[simps]
def embDomain.addMonoidHom (f : α ↪ β) : (α →₀ M) →+ β →₀ M where
toFun v := embDomain f v
map_zero' := by simp
map_add' v w := by
ext b
by_cases h : b ∈ Set.range f
· rcases h with ⟨a, rfl⟩
simp
· simp only [Set.mem_range, not_exists, coe_add, Pi.add_apply,
embDomain_notin_range _ _ _ h, add_zero]
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_add (f : α ↪ β) (v w : α →₀ M) :
embDomain f (v + w) = embDomain f v + embDomain f w :=
(embDomain.addMonoidHom f).map_add v w
end AddZeroClass
section AddMonoid
variable [AddMonoid M]
/-- Note the general `SMul` instance for `Finsupp` doesn't apply as `ℕ` is not distributive
unless `β i`'s addition is commutative. -/
instance instNatSMul : SMul ℕ (α →₀ M) :=
⟨fun n v => v.mapRange (n • ·) (nsmul_zero _)⟩
instance instAddMonoid : AddMonoid (α →₀ M) :=
fast_instance% DFunLike.coe_injective.addMonoid _ coe_zero coe_add fun _ _ => rfl
end AddMonoid
instance instAddCommMonoid [AddCommMonoid M] : AddCommMonoid (α →₀ M) :=
fast_instance% DFunLike.coe_injective.addCommMonoid
DFunLike.coe coe_zero coe_add (fun _ _ => rfl)
instance instNeg [NegZeroClass G] : Neg (α →₀ G) :=
⟨mapRange Neg.neg neg_zero⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_neg [NegZeroClass G] (g : α →₀ G) : ⇑(-g) = -g := rfl
theorem neg_apply [NegZeroClass G] (g : α →₀ G) (a : α) : (-g) a = -g a :=
rfl
theorem mapRange_neg [NegZeroClass G] [NegZeroClass H] {f : G → H} {hf : f 0 = 0}
(hf' : ∀ x, f (-x) = -f x) (v : α →₀ G) : mapRange f hf (-v) = -mapRange f hf v :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [hf', neg_apply, mapRange_apply]
theorem mapRange_neg' [AddGroup G] [SubtractionMonoid H] [FunLike β G H] [AddMonoidHomClass β G H]
{f : β} (v : α →₀ G) :
mapRange f (map_zero f) (-v) = -mapRange f (map_zero f) v :=
mapRange_neg (map_neg f) v
instance instSub [SubNegZeroMonoid G] : Sub (α →₀ G) :=
⟨zipWith Sub.sub (sub_zero _)⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_sub [SubNegZeroMonoid G] (g₁ g₂ : α →₀ G) : ⇑(g₁ - g₂) = g₁ - g₂ := rfl
theorem sub_apply [SubNegZeroMonoid G] (g₁ g₂ : α →₀ G) (a : α) : (g₁ - g₂) a = g₁ a - g₂ a :=
rfl
theorem mapRange_sub [SubNegZeroMonoid G] [SubNegZeroMonoid H] {f : G → H} {hf : f 0 = 0}
(hf' : ∀ x y, f (x - y) = f x - f y) (v₁ v₂ : α →₀ G) :
mapRange f hf (v₁ - v₂) = mapRange f hf v₁ - mapRange f hf v₂ :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [hf', sub_apply, mapRange_apply]
theorem mapRange_sub' [AddGroup G] [SubtractionMonoid H] [FunLike β G H] [AddMonoidHomClass β G H]
{f : β} (v₁ v₂ : α →₀ G) :
mapRange f (map_zero f) (v₁ - v₂) = mapRange f (map_zero f) v₁ - mapRange f (map_zero f) v₂ :=
mapRange_sub (map_sub f) v₁ v₂
/-- Note the general `SMul` instance for `Finsupp` doesn't apply as `ℤ` is not distributive
unless `β i`'s addition is commutative. -/
instance instIntSMul [AddGroup G] : SMul ℤ (α →₀ G) :=
⟨fun n v => v.mapRange (n • ·) (zsmul_zero _)⟩
instance instAddGroup [AddGroup G] : AddGroup (α →₀ G) :=
fast_instance% DFunLike.coe_injective.addGroup DFunLike.coe coe_zero coe_add coe_neg coe_sub
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
instance instAddCommGroup [AddCommGroup G] : AddCommGroup (α →₀ G) :=
fast_instance% DFunLike.coe_injective.addCommGroup DFunLike.coe coe_zero coe_add coe_neg coe_sub
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_neg [AddGroup G] (f : α →₀ G) : support (-f) = support f :=
Finset.Subset.antisymm support_mapRange
(calc
support f = support (- -f) := congr_arg support (neg_neg _).symm
_ ⊆ support (-f) := support_mapRange
)
theorem support_sub [DecidableEq α] [AddGroup G] {f g : α →₀ G} :
support (f - g) ⊆ support f ∪ support g := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← support_neg g]
exact support_add
end Finsupp
| Mathlib/Data/Finsupp/Defs.lean | 1,142 | 1,155 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Minpoly.IsIntegrallyClosed
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.PrimitiveElement
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.IsAlgClosed.Basic
/-!
# Results about `minpoly R x / (X - C x)`
## Main definition
- `minpolyDiv`: The polynomial `minpoly R x / (X - C x)`.
We used the contents of this file to describe the dual basis of a powerbasis under the trace form.
See `traceForm_dualBasis_powerBasis_eq`.
## Main results
- `span_coeff_minpolyDiv`: The coefficients of `minpolyDiv` spans `R<x>`.
-/
open Polynomial Module
variable (R K) {L S} [CommRing R] [Field K] [Field L] [CommRing S] [Algebra R S] [Algebra K L]
variable (x : S)
/-- `minpolyDiv R x : S[X]` for `x : S` is the polynomial `minpoly R x / (X - C x)`. -/
noncomputable def minpolyDiv : S[X] := (minpoly R x).map (algebraMap R S) /ₘ (X - C x)
lemma minpolyDiv_spec :
minpolyDiv R x * (X - C x) = (minpoly R x).map (algebraMap R S) := by
delta minpolyDiv
rw [mul_comm, mul_divByMonic_eq_iff_isRoot, IsRoot, eval_map, ← aeval_def, minpoly.aeval]
lemma coeff_minpolyDiv (i) : coeff (minpolyDiv R x) i =
algebraMap R S (coeff (minpoly R x) (i + 1)) + coeff (minpolyDiv R x) (i + 1) * x := by
rw [← coeff_map, ← minpolyDiv_spec R x]; simp [mul_sub]
variable {R x}
lemma minpolyDiv_eq_zero (hx : ¬IsIntegral R x) : minpolyDiv R x = 0 := by
delta minpolyDiv minpoly
rw [dif_neg hx, Polynomial.map_zero, zero_divByMonic]
lemma eval_minpolyDiv_self : (minpolyDiv R x).eval x = aeval x (derivative <| minpoly R x) := by
rw [aeval_def, ← eval_map, ← derivative_map, ← minpolyDiv_spec R x]; simp
lemma minpolyDiv_eval_eq_zero_of_ne_of_aeval_eq_zero [IsDomain S]
{y} (hxy : y ≠ x) (hy : aeval y (minpoly R x) = 0) : (minpolyDiv R x).eval y = 0 := by
rw [aeval_def, ← eval_map, ← minpolyDiv_spec R x] at hy
simp only [eval_mul, eval_sub, eval_X, eval_C, mul_eq_zero] at hy
exact hy.resolve_right (by rwa [sub_eq_zero])
lemma eval₂_minpolyDiv_of_eval₂_eq_zero {T} [CommRing T]
[IsDomain T] [DecidableEq T] {x y}
(σ : S →+* T) (hy : eval₂ (σ.comp (algebraMap R S)) y (minpoly R x) = 0) :
eval₂ σ y (minpolyDiv R x) =
if σ x = y then σ (aeval x (derivative <| minpoly R x)) else 0 := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [← h, eval₂_hom, eval_minpolyDiv_self]
· rw [← eval₂_map, ← minpolyDiv_spec] at hy
simpa [sub_eq_zero, Ne.symm h] using hy
lemma eval₂_minpolyDiv_self {T} [CommRing T] [Algebra R T] [IsDomain T] [DecidableEq T] (x : S)
(σ₁ σ₂ : S →ₐ[R] T) :
eval₂ σ₁ (σ₂ x) (minpolyDiv R x) =
if σ₁ x = σ₂ x then σ₁ (aeval x (derivative <| minpoly R x)) else 0 := by
apply eval₂_minpolyDiv_of_eval₂_eq_zero
rw [AlgHom.comp_algebraMap, ← σ₂.comp_algebraMap, ← eval₂_map, ← RingHom.coe_coe, eval₂_hom,
eval_map, ← aeval_def, minpoly.aeval, map_zero]
lemma eval_minpolyDiv_of_aeval_eq_zero [IsDomain S] [DecidableEq S]
{y} (hy : aeval y (minpoly R x) = 0) :
(minpolyDiv R x).eval y = if x = y then aeval x (derivative <| minpoly R x) else 0 := by
rw [eval, eval₂_minpolyDiv_of_eval₂_eq_zero, RingHom.id_apply, RingHom.id_apply]
simpa [aeval_def] using hy
lemma coeff_minpolyDiv_mem_adjoin (x : S) (i) :
coeff (minpolyDiv R x) i ∈ Algebra.adjoin R {x} := by
by_contra H
have : ∀ j, coeff (minpolyDiv R x) (i + j) ∉ Algebra.adjoin R {x} := by
intro j; induction j with
| zero => exact H
| succ j IH =>
intro H; apply IH
rw [coeff_minpolyDiv]
refine add_mem ?_ (mul_mem H (Algebra.self_mem_adjoin_singleton R x))
exact Subalgebra.algebraMap_mem _ _
apply this (natDegree (minpolyDiv R x) + 1)
rw [coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt]
· exact zero_mem _
· refine (Nat.le_add_left _ i).trans_lt ?_
rw [← add_assoc]
exact Nat.lt_succ_self _
section IsIntegral
variable (hx : IsIntegral R x)
include hx
lemma minpolyDiv_ne_zero [Nontrivial S] : minpolyDiv R x ≠ 0 := by
intro e
have := minpolyDiv_spec R x
rw [e, zero_mul] at this
exact ((minpoly.monic hx).map (algebraMap R S)).ne_zero this.symm
lemma minpolyDiv_monic : Monic (minpolyDiv R x) := by
nontriviality S
| have := congr_arg leadingCoeff (minpolyDiv_spec R x)
rw [leadingCoeff_mul', ((minpoly.monic hx).map (algebraMap R S)).leadingCoeff] at this
· simpa using this
· simpa using minpolyDiv_ne_zero hx
lemma natDegree_minpolyDiv_succ [Nontrivial S] :
natDegree (minpolyDiv R x) + 1 = natDegree (minpoly R x) := by
rw [← (minpoly.monic hx).natDegree_map (algebraMap R S), ← minpolyDiv_spec, natDegree_mul']
· simp
· simpa using minpolyDiv_ne_zero hx
lemma natDegree_minpolyDiv_lt [Nontrivial S] :
natDegree (minpolyDiv R x) < natDegree (minpoly R x) := by
rw [← natDegree_minpolyDiv_succ hx]
exact Nat.lt_succ_self _
lemma minpolyDiv_eq_of_isIntegrallyClosed [IsDomain R] [IsIntegrallyClosed R] [IsDomain S]
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/Minpoly/MinpolyDiv.lean | 110 | 126 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Stuart Presnell. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Stuart Presnell
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PrimeFin
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
/-!
# Basic lemmas on prime factorizations
-/
open Finset List Finsupp
namespace Nat
variable {a b m n p : ℕ}
/-! ### Basic facts about factorization -/
/-! ## Lemmas characterising when `n.factorization p = 0` -/
theorem factorization_eq_zero_of_lt {n p : ℕ} (h : n < p) : n.factorization p = 0 :=
Finsupp.not_mem_support_iff.mp (mt le_of_mem_primeFactors (not_le_of_lt h))
@[simp]
theorem factorization_one_right (n : ℕ) : n.factorization 1 = 0 :=
factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime _ not_prime_one
theorem dvd_of_factorization_pos {n p : ℕ} (hn : n.factorization p ≠ 0) : p ∣ n :=
dvd_of_mem_primeFactorsList <| mem_primeFactors_iff_mem_primeFactorsList.1 <| mem_support_iff.2 hn
theorem factorization_eq_zero_iff_remainder {p r : ℕ} (i : ℕ) (pp : p.Prime) (hr0 : r ≠ 0) :
¬p ∣ r ↔ (p * i + r).factorization p = 0 := by
refine ⟨factorization_eq_zero_of_remainder i, fun h => ?_⟩
rw [factorization_eq_zero_iff] at h
contrapose! h
refine ⟨pp, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [← Nat.dvd_add_iff_right (dvd_mul_right p i)]
· contrapose! hr0
exact (add_eq_zero.1 hr0).2
/-- The only numbers with empty prime factorization are `0` and `1` -/
theorem factorization_eq_zero_iff' (n : ℕ) : n.factorization = 0 ↔ n = 0 ∨ n = 1 := by
rw [factorization_eq_primeFactorsList_multiset n]
simp [factorization, AddEquiv.map_eq_zero_iff, Multiset.coe_eq_zero]
/-! ## Lemmas about factorizations of products and powers -/
/-- A product over `n.factorization` can be written as a product over `n.primeFactors`; -/
lemma prod_factorization_eq_prod_primeFactors {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (f : ℕ → ℕ → β) :
n.factorization.prod f = ∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, f p (n.factorization p) := rfl
/-- A product over `n.primeFactors` can be written as a product over `n.factorization`; -/
lemma prod_primeFactors_prod_factorization {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (f : ℕ → β) :
∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, f p = n.factorization.prod (fun p _ ↦ f p) := rfl
/-! ## Lemmas about factorizations of primes and prime powers -/
/-- The multiplicity of prime `p` in `p` is `1` -/
@[simp]
theorem Prime.factorization_self {p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) : p.factorization p = 1 := by simp [hp]
/-- If the factorization of `n` contains just one number `p` then `n` is a power of `p` -/
theorem eq_pow_of_factorization_eq_single {n p k : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0)
(h : n.factorization = Finsupp.single p k) : n = p ^ k := by
rw [← Nat.factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hn, h]
simp
/-- The only prime factor of prime `p` is `p` itself. -/
theorem Prime.eq_of_factorization_pos {p q : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) (h : p.factorization q ≠ 0) :
p = q := by simpa [hp.factorization, single_apply] using h
/-! ### Equivalence between `ℕ+` and `ℕ →₀ ℕ` with support in the primes. -/
theorem eq_factorization_iff {n : ℕ} {f : ℕ →₀ ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hf : ∀ p ∈ f.support, Prime p) :
f = n.factorization ↔ f.prod (· ^ ·) = n :=
⟨fun h => by rw [h, factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hn], fun h => by
rw [← h, prod_pow_factorization_eq_self hf]⟩
theorem factorizationEquiv_inv_apply {f : ℕ →₀ ℕ} (hf : ∀ p ∈ f.support, Prime p) :
(factorizationEquiv.symm ⟨f, hf⟩).1 = f.prod (· ^ ·) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ordProj_of_not_prime (n p : ℕ) (hp : ¬p.Prime) : ordProj[p] n = 1 := by
simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n hp]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_proj_of_not_prime := ordProj_of_not_prime
@[simp]
theorem ordCompl_of_not_prime (n p : ℕ) (hp : ¬p.Prime) : ordCompl[p] n = n := by
simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n hp]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_of_not_prime := ordCompl_of_not_prime
theorem ordCompl_dvd (n p : ℕ) : ordCompl[p] n ∣ n :=
div_dvd_of_dvd (ordProj_dvd n p)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_dvd := ordCompl_dvd
theorem ordProj_pos (n p : ℕ) : 0 < ordProj[p] n := by
if pp : p.Prime then simp [pow_pos pp.pos] else simp [pp]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_proj_pos := ordProj_pos
theorem ordProj_le {n : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : ordProj[p] n ≤ n :=
le_of_dvd hn.bot_lt (Nat.ordProj_dvd n p)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_proj_le := ordProj_le
theorem ordCompl_pos {n : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : 0 < ordCompl[p] n := by
if pp : p.Prime then
exact Nat.div_pos (ordProj_le p hn) (ordProj_pos n p)
else
simpa [Nat.factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n pp] using hn.bot_lt
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_pos := ordCompl_pos
theorem ordCompl_le (n p : ℕ) : ordCompl[p] n ≤ n :=
Nat.div_le_self _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_le := ordCompl_le
theorem ordProj_mul_ordCompl_eq_self (n p : ℕ) : ordProj[p] n * ordCompl[p] n = n :=
Nat.mul_div_cancel' (ordProj_dvd n p)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias ord_proj_mul_ord_compl_eq_self := ordProj_mul_ordCompl_eq_self
theorem ordProj_mul {a b : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
ordProj[p] (a * b) = ordProj[p] a * ordProj[p] b := by
simp [factorization_mul ha hb, pow_add]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_proj_mul := ordProj_mul
theorem ordCompl_mul (a b p : ℕ) : ordCompl[p] (a * b) = ordCompl[p] a * ordCompl[p] b := by
if ha : a = 0 then simp [ha] else
if hb : b = 0 then simp [hb] else
simp only [ordProj_mul p ha hb]
rw [div_mul_div_comm (ordProj_dvd a p) (ordProj_dvd b p)]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_mul := ordCompl_mul
/-! ### Factorization and divisibility -/
/-- A crude upper bound on `n.factorization p` -/
theorem factorization_lt {n : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : n.factorization p < n := by
by_cases pp : p.Prime
· exact (Nat.pow_lt_pow_iff_right pp.one_lt).1 <| (ordProj_le p hn).trans_lt <|
Nat.lt_pow_self pp.one_lt
· simpa only [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n pp] using hn.bot_lt
/-- An upper bound on `n.factorization p` -/
theorem factorization_le_of_le_pow {n p b : ℕ} (hb : n ≤ p ^ b) : n.factorization p ≤ b := by
if hn : n = 0 then simp [hn] else
if pp : p.Prime then
exact (Nat.pow_le_pow_iff_right pp.one_lt).1 ((ordProj_le p hn).trans hb)
else
simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n pp]
theorem factorization_prime_le_iff_dvd {d n : ℕ} (hd : d ≠ 0) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → d.factorization p ≤ n.factorization p) ↔ d ∣ n := by
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd hd hn]
refine ⟨fun h p => (em p.Prime).elim (h p) fun hp => ?_, fun h p _ => h p⟩
simp_rw [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime _ hp]
rfl
theorem factorization_le_factorization_mul_left {a b : ℕ} (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a.factorization ≤ (a * b).factorization := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha)
· simp
rw [factorization_le_iff_dvd ha <| mul_ne_zero ha hb]
exact Dvd.intro b rfl
theorem factorization_le_factorization_mul_right {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
b.factorization ≤ (a * b).factorization := by
rw [mul_comm]
apply factorization_le_factorization_mul_left ha
theorem Prime.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization {p k n : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
p ^ k ∣ n ↔ k ≤ n.factorization p := by
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd (pow_pos pp.pos k).ne' hn, pp.factorization_pow, single_le_iff]
theorem Prime.pow_dvd_iff_dvd_ordProj {p k n : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
p ^ k ∣ n ↔ p ^ k ∣ ordProj[p] n := by
rw [pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right pp.one_lt, pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias Prime.pow_dvd_iff_dvd_ord_proj := Prime.pow_dvd_iff_dvd_ordProj
theorem Prime.dvd_iff_one_le_factorization {p n : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
p ∣ n ↔ 1 ≤ n.factorization p :=
Iff.trans (by simp) (pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn)
theorem exists_factorization_lt_of_lt {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hab : a < b) :
∃ p : ℕ, a.factorization p < b.factorization p := by
have hb : b ≠ 0 := (ha.bot_lt.trans hab).ne'
contrapose! hab
rw [← Finsupp.le_def, factorization_le_iff_dvd hb ha] at hab
exact le_of_dvd ha.bot_lt hab
@[simp]
theorem factorization_div {d n : ℕ} (h : d ∣ n) :
(n / d).factorization = n.factorization - d.factorization := by
rcases eq_or_ne d 0 with (rfl | hd); · simp [zero_dvd_iff.mp h]
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn); · simp [tsub_eq_zero_of_le]
apply add_left_injective d.factorization
simp only
rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le <| (Nat.factorization_le_iff_dvd hd hn).mpr h, ←
Nat.factorization_mul (Nat.div_pos (Nat.le_of_dvd hn.bot_lt h) hd.bot_lt).ne' hd,
Nat.div_mul_cancel h]
theorem dvd_ordProj_of_dvd {n p : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (pp : p.Prime) (h : p ∣ n) : p ∣ ordProj[p] n :=
dvd_pow_self p (Prime.factorization_pos_of_dvd pp hn h).ne'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias dvd_ord_proj_of_dvd := dvd_ordProj_of_dvd
theorem not_dvd_ordCompl {n p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) : ¬p ∣ ordCompl[p] n := by
rw [Nat.Prime.dvd_iff_one_le_factorization hp (ordCompl_pos p hn).ne']
rw [Nat.factorization_div (Nat.ordProj_dvd n p)]
simp [hp.factorization]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias not_dvd_ord_compl := not_dvd_ordCompl
theorem coprime_ordCompl {n p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) : Coprime p (ordCompl[p] n) :=
(or_iff_left (not_dvd_ordCompl hp hn)).mp <| coprime_or_dvd_of_prime hp _
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias coprime_ord_compl := coprime_ordCompl
theorem factorization_ordCompl (n p : ℕ) :
(ordCompl[p] n).factorization = n.factorization.erase p := by
if hn : n = 0 then simp [hn] else
if pp : p.Prime then ?_ else
simp [pp]
ext q
rcases eq_or_ne q p with (rfl | hqp)
· simp only [Finsupp.erase_same, factorization_eq_zero_iff, not_dvd_ordCompl pp hn]
simp
· rw [Finsupp.erase_ne hqp, factorization_div (ordProj_dvd n p)]
simp [pp.factorization, hqp.symm]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias factorization_ord_compl := factorization_ordCompl
-- `ordCompl[p] n` is the largest divisor of `n` not divisible by `p`.
theorem dvd_ordCompl_of_dvd_not_dvd {p d n : ℕ} (hdn : d ∣ n) (hpd : ¬p ∣ d) :
d ∣ ordCompl[p] n := by
if hn0 : n = 0 then simp [hn0] else
if hd0 : d = 0 then simp [hd0] at hpd else
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd hd0 (ordCompl_pos p hn0).ne', factorization_ordCompl]
intro q
if hqp : q = p then
simp [factorization_eq_zero_iff, hqp, hpd]
else
simp [hqp, (factorization_le_iff_dvd hd0 hn0).2 hdn q]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias dvd_ord_compl_of_dvd_not_dvd := dvd_ordCompl_of_dvd_not_dvd
/-- If `n` is a nonzero natural number and `p ≠ 1`, then there are natural numbers `e`
and `n'` such that `n'` is not divisible by `p` and `n = p^e * n'`. -/
theorem exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (p : ℕ) (hp : p ≠ 1) :
∃ e n' : ℕ, ¬p ∣ n' ∧ n = p ^ e * n' :=
let ⟨a', h₁, h₂⟩ :=
(Nat.finiteMultiplicity_iff.mpr ⟨hp, Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn⟩).exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd
⟨_, a', h₂, h₁⟩
/-- Any nonzero natural number is the product of an odd part `m` and a power of
two `2 ^ k`. -/
theorem exists_eq_two_pow_mul_odd {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
∃ k m : ℕ, Odd m ∧ n = 2 ^ k * m :=
let ⟨k, m, hm, hn⟩ := exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd hn 2 (succ_ne_self 1)
⟨k, m, not_even_iff_odd.1 (mt Even.two_dvd hm), hn⟩
theorem dvd_iff_div_factorization_eq_tsub {d n : ℕ} (hd : d ≠ 0) (hdn : d ≤ n) :
d ∣ n ↔ (n / d).factorization = n.factorization - d.factorization := by
refine ⟨factorization_div, ?_⟩
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hdn with (rfl | hd_lt_n); · simp
have h1 : n / d ≠ 0 := by simp [*]
intro h
rw [dvd_iff_le_div_mul n d]
by_contra h2
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := exists_factorization_lt_of_lt (mul_ne_zero h1 hd) (not_le.mp h2)
rwa [factorization_mul h1 hd, add_apply, ← lt_tsub_iff_right, h, tsub_apply,
lt_self_iff_false] at hp
theorem ordProj_dvd_ordProj_of_dvd {a b : ℕ} (hb0 : b ≠ 0) (hab : a ∣ b) (p : ℕ) :
ordProj[p] a ∣ ordProj[p] b := by
rcases em' p.Prime with (pp | pp); · simp [pp]
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha0); · simp
rw [pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right pp.one_lt]
exact (factorization_le_iff_dvd ha0 hb0).2 hab p
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias ord_proj_dvd_ord_proj_of_dvd := ordProj_dvd_ordProj_of_dvd
theorem ordProj_dvd_ordProj_iff_dvd {a b : ℕ} (ha0 : a ≠ 0) (hb0 : b ≠ 0) :
(∀ p : ℕ, ordProj[p] a ∣ ordProj[p] b) ↔ a ∣ b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun hab p => ordProj_dvd_ordProj_of_dvd hb0 hab p⟩
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd ha0 hb0]
intro q
rcases le_or_lt q 1 with (hq_le | hq1)
· interval_cases q <;> simp
exact (pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right hq1).1 (h q)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias ord_proj_dvd_ord_proj_iff_dvd := ordProj_dvd_ordProj_iff_dvd
theorem ordCompl_dvd_ordCompl_of_dvd {a b : ℕ} (hab : a ∣ b) (p : ℕ) :
ordCompl[p] a ∣ ordCompl[p] b := by
rcases em' p.Prime with (pp | pp)
· simp [pp, hab]
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb0)
· simp
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha0)
· cases hb0 (zero_dvd_iff.1 hab)
have ha := (Nat.div_pos (ordProj_le p ha0) (ordProj_pos a p)).ne'
have hb := (Nat.div_pos (ordProj_le p hb0) (ordProj_pos b p)).ne'
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd ha hb, factorization_ordCompl a p, factorization_ordCompl b p]
intro q
rcases eq_or_ne q p with (rfl | hqp)
· simp
simp_rw [erase_ne hqp]
exact (factorization_le_iff_dvd ha0 hb0).2 hab q
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias ord_compl_dvd_ord_compl_of_dvd := ordCompl_dvd_ordCompl_of_dvd
theorem ordCompl_dvd_ordCompl_iff_dvd (a b : ℕ) :
(∀ p : ℕ, ordCompl[p] a ∣ ordCompl[p] b) ↔ a ∣ b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun hab p => ordCompl_dvd_ordCompl_of_dvd hab p⟩
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb0)
· simp
if pa : a.Prime then ?_ else simpa [pa] using h a
if pb : b.Prime then ?_ else simpa [pb] using h b
rw [prime_dvd_prime_iff_eq pa pb]
by_contra hab
apply pa.ne_one
rw [← Nat.dvd_one, ← Nat.mul_dvd_mul_iff_left hb0.bot_lt, mul_one]
simpa [Prime.factorization_self pb, Prime.factorization pa, hab] using h b
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias ord_compl_dvd_ord_compl_iff_dvd := ordCompl_dvd_ordCompl_iff_dvd
theorem dvd_iff_prime_pow_dvd_dvd (n d : ℕ) :
d ∣ n ↔ ∀ p k : ℕ, Prime p → p ^ k ∣ d → p ^ k ∣ n := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
rcases eq_or_ne d 0 with (rfl | hd)
· simp only [zero_dvd_iff, hn, false_iff, not_forall]
exact ⟨2, n, prime_two, dvd_zero _, mt (le_of_dvd hn.bot_lt) (n.lt_two_pow_self).not_le⟩
refine ⟨fun h p k _ hpkd => dvd_trans hpkd h, ?_⟩
rw [← factorization_prime_le_iff_dvd hd hn]
intro h p pp
simp_rw [← pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn]
exact h p _ pp (ordProj_dvd _ _)
theorem prod_primeFactors_dvd (n : ℕ) : ∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, p ∣ n := by
by_cases hn : n = 0
· subst hn
simp
· simpa [prod_primeFactorsList hn] using (n.primeFactorsList : Multiset ℕ).toFinset_prod_dvd_prod
theorem factorization_gcd {a b : ℕ} (ha_pos : a ≠ 0) (hb_pos : b ≠ 0) :
(gcd a b).factorization = a.factorization ⊓ b.factorization := by
let dfac := a.factorization ⊓ b.factorization
let d := dfac.prod (· ^ ·)
have dfac_prime : ∀ p : ℕ, p ∈ dfac.support → Prime p := by
intro p hp
have : p ∈ a.primeFactorsList ∧ p ∈ b.primeFactorsList := by simpa [dfac] using hp
exact prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList this.1
have h1 : d.factorization = dfac := prod_pow_factorization_eq_self dfac_prime
have hd_pos : d ≠ 0 := (factorizationEquiv.invFun ⟨dfac, dfac_prime⟩).2.ne'
suffices d = gcd a b by rwa [← this]
apply gcd_greatest
· rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd hd_pos ha_pos, h1]
exact inf_le_left
· rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd hd_pos hb_pos, h1]
exact inf_le_right
· intro e hea heb
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne e 0 with (rfl | he_pos)
· simp only [zero_dvd_iff] at hea
contradiction
have hea' := (factorization_le_iff_dvd he_pos ha_pos).mpr hea
have heb' := (factorization_le_iff_dvd he_pos hb_pos).mpr heb
simp [dfac, ← factorization_le_iff_dvd he_pos hd_pos, h1, hea', heb']
theorem factorization_lcm {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
(a.lcm b).factorization = a.factorization ⊔ b.factorization := by
rw [← add_right_inj (a.gcd b).factorization, ←
factorization_mul (mt gcd_eq_zero_iff.1 fun h => ha h.1) (lcm_ne_zero ha hb), gcd_mul_lcm,
factorization_gcd ha hb, factorization_mul ha hb]
ext1
exact (min_add_max _ _).symm
variable (a b)
@[simp]
lemma factorizationLCMLeft_zero_left : factorizationLCMLeft 0 b = 1 := by
simp [factorizationLCMLeft]
@[simp]
lemma factorizationLCMLeft_zero_right : factorizationLCMLeft a 0 = 1 := by
simp [factorizationLCMLeft]
@[simp]
lemma factorizationLCRight_zero_left : factorizationLCMRight 0 b = 1 := by
simp [factorizationLCMRight]
@[simp]
lemma factorizationLCMRight_zero_right : factorizationLCMRight a 0 = 1 := by
simp [factorizationLCMRight]
lemma factorizationLCMLeft_pos :
0 < factorizationLCMLeft a b := by
apply Nat.pos_of_ne_zero
rw [factorizationLCMLeft, Finsupp.prod_ne_zero_iff]
intro p _ H
by_cases h : b.factorization p ≤ a.factorization p
· simp only [h, reduceIte, pow_eq_zero_iff', ne_eq] at H
simpa [H.1] using H.2
· simp only [h, reduceIte, one_ne_zero] at H
lemma factorizationLCMRight_pos :
0 < factorizationLCMRight a b := by
apply Nat.pos_of_ne_zero
rw [factorizationLCMRight, Finsupp.prod_ne_zero_iff]
intro p _ H
by_cases h : b.factorization p ≤ a.factorization p
· simp only [h, reduceIte, pow_eq_zero_iff', ne_eq, reduceCtorEq] at H
· simp only [h, ↓reduceIte, pow_eq_zero_iff', ne_eq] at H
simpa [H.1] using H.2
lemma coprime_factorizationLCMLeft_factorizationLCMRight :
(factorizationLCMLeft a b).Coprime (factorizationLCMRight a b) := by
rw [factorizationLCMLeft, factorizationLCMRight]
refine coprime_prod_left_iff.mpr fun p hp ↦ coprime_prod_right_iff.mpr fun q hq ↦ ?_
dsimp only; split_ifs with h h'
any_goals simp only [coprime_one_right_eq_true, coprime_one_left_eq_true]
refine coprime_pow_primes _ _ (prime_of_mem_primeFactors hp) (prime_of_mem_primeFactors hq) ?_
contrapose! h'; rwa [← h']
variable {a b}
lemma factorizationLCMLeft_mul_factorizationLCMRight (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
(factorizationLCMLeft a b) * (factorizationLCMRight a b) = lcm a b := by
rw [← factorization_prod_pow_eq_self (lcm_ne_zero ha hb), factorizationLCMLeft,
factorizationLCMRight, ← prod_mul]
congr; ext p n; split_ifs <;> simp
variable (a b)
lemma factorizationLCMLeft_dvd_left : factorizationLCMLeft a b ∣ a := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with rfl | ha
· simp only [dvd_zero]
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with rfl | hb
· simp [factorizationLCMLeft]
nth_rewrite 2 [← factorization_prod_pow_eq_self ha]
rw [prod_of_support_subset (s := (lcm a b).factorization.support)]
· apply prod_dvd_prod_of_dvd; rintro p -; dsimp only; split_ifs with le
· rw [factorization_lcm ha hb]; apply pow_dvd_pow; exact sup_le le_rfl le
· apply one_dvd
· intro p hp; rw [mem_support_iff] at hp ⊢
rw [factorization_lcm ha hb]; exact (lt_sup_iff.mpr <| .inl <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hp).ne'
· intros; rw [pow_zero]
lemma factorizationLCMRight_dvd_right : factorizationLCMRight a b ∣ b := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with rfl | ha
· simp [factorizationLCMRight]
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with rfl | hb
· simp only [dvd_zero]
nth_rewrite 2 [← factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hb]
rw [prod_of_support_subset (s := (lcm a b).factorization.support)]
· apply Finset.prod_dvd_prod_of_dvd; rintro p -; dsimp only; split_ifs with le
· apply one_dvd
· rw [factorization_lcm ha hb]; apply pow_dvd_pow; exact sup_le (not_le.1 le).le le_rfl
· intro p hp; rw [mem_support_iff] at hp ⊢
rw [factorization_lcm ha hb]; exact (lt_sup_iff.mpr <| .inr <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hp).ne'
· intros; rw [pow_zero]
@[to_additive sum_primeFactors_gcd_add_sum_primeFactors_mul]
theorem prod_primeFactors_gcd_mul_prod_primeFactors_mul {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (m n : ℕ)
(f : ℕ → β) :
(m.gcd n).primeFactors.prod f * (m * n).primeFactors.prod f =
m.primeFactors.prod f * n.primeFactors.prod f := by
obtain rfl | hm₀ := eq_or_ne m 0
· simp
obtain rfl | hn₀ := eq_or_ne n 0
· simp
· rw [primeFactors_mul hm₀ hn₀, primeFactors_gcd hm₀ hn₀, mul_comm, Finset.prod_union_inter]
theorem setOf_pow_dvd_eq_Icc_factorization {n p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
{ i : ℕ | i ≠ 0 ∧ p ^ i ∣ n } = Set.Icc 1 (n.factorization p) := by
ext
simp [Nat.lt_succ_iff, one_le_iff_ne_zero, pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn]
/-- The set of positive powers of prime `p` that divide `n` is exactly the set of
positive natural numbers up to `n.factorization p`. -/
theorem Icc_factorization_eq_pow_dvd (n : ℕ) {p : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) :
Icc 1 (n.factorization p) = {i ∈ Ico 1 n | p ^ i ∣ n} := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
ext x
simp only [mem_Icc, Finset.mem_filter, mem_Ico, and_assoc, and_congr_right_iff,
pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn, iff_and_self]
exact fun _ H => lt_of_le_of_lt H (factorization_lt p hn)
theorem factorization_eq_card_pow_dvd (n : ℕ) {p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) :
n.factorization p = #{i ∈ Ico 1 n | p ^ i ∣ n} := by
simp [← Icc_factorization_eq_pow_dvd n pp]
theorem Ico_filter_pow_dvd_eq {n p b : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (hn : n ≠ 0) (hb : n ≤ p ^ b) :
{i ∈ Ico 1 n | p ^ i ∣ n} = {i ∈ Icc 1 b | p ^ i ∣ n} := by
ext x
simp only [Finset.mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Icc, and_congr_left_iff, and_congr_right_iff]
rintro h1 -
exact iff_of_true (lt_of_pow_dvd_right hn pp.two_le h1) <|
(Nat.pow_le_pow_iff_right pp.one_lt).1 <| (le_of_dvd hn.bot_lt h1).trans hb
/-! ### Factorization and coprimes -/
/-- If `p` is a prime factor of `a` then the power of `p` in `a` is the same that in `a * b`,
for any `b` coprime to `a`. -/
theorem factorization_eq_of_coprime_left {p a b : ℕ} (hab : Coprime a b)
(hpa : p ∈ a.primeFactorsList) : (a * b).factorization p = a.factorization p := by
rw [factorization_mul_apply_of_coprime hab, ← primeFactorsList_count_eq,
← primeFactorsList_count_eq,
count_eq_zero_of_not_mem (coprime_primeFactorsList_disjoint hab hpa), add_zero]
/-- If `p` is a prime factor of `b` then the power of `p` in `b` is the same that in `a * b`,
for any `a` coprime to `b`. -/
theorem factorization_eq_of_coprime_right {p a b : ℕ} (hab : Coprime a b)
(hpb : p ∈ b.primeFactorsList) : (a * b).factorization p = b.factorization p := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact factorization_eq_of_coprime_left (coprime_comm.mp hab) hpb
/-- Two positive naturals are equal if their prime padic valuations are equal -/
theorem eq_iff_prime_padicValNat_eq (a b : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a = b ↔ ∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → padicValNat p a = padicValNat p b := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
simp
· intro h
refine eq_of_factorization_eq ha hb fun p => ?_
by_cases pp : p.Prime
· simp [factorization_def, pp, h p pp]
· simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime, pp]
theorem prod_pow_prime_padicValNat (n : Nat) (hn : n ≠ 0) (m : Nat) (pr : n < m) :
∏ p ∈ range m with p.Prime, p ^ padicValNat p n = n := by
nth_rw 2 [← factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hn]
rw [eq_comm]
apply Finset.prod_subset_one_on_sdiff
· exact fun p hp => Finset.mem_filter.mpr ⟨Finset.mem_range.2 <| pr.trans_le' <|
le_of_mem_primeFactors hp, prime_of_mem_primeFactors hp⟩
· intro p hp
obtain ⟨hp1, hp2⟩ := Finset.mem_sdiff.mp hp
rw [← factorization_def n (Finset.mem_filter.mp hp1).2]
simp [Finsupp.not_mem_support_iff.mp hp2]
· intro p hp
simp [factorization_def n (prime_of_mem_primeFactors hp)]
/-! ### Lemmas about factorizations of particular functions -/
-- TODO: Port lemmas from `Data/Nat/Multiplicity` to here, re-written in terms of `factorization`
/-- Exactly `n / p` naturals in `[1, n]` are multiples of `p`.
See `Nat.card_multiples'` for an alternative spelling of the statement. -/
theorem card_multiples (n p : ℕ) : #{e ∈ range n | p ∣ e + 1} = n / p := by
induction' n with n hn
· simp
simp [Nat.succ_div, add_ite, add_zero, Finset.range_succ, filter_insert, apply_ite card,
card_insert_of_not_mem, hn]
/-- Exactly `n / p` naturals in `(0, n]` are multiples of `p`. -/
theorem Ioc_filter_dvd_card_eq_div (n p : ℕ) : #{x ∈ Ioc 0 n | p ∣ x} = n / p := by
induction' n with n IH
· simp
-- TODO: Golf away `h1` after Yaël PRs a lemma asserting this
have h1 : Ioc 0 n.succ = insert n.succ (Ioc 0 n) := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hn)
· simp
simp_rw [← Ico_succ_succ, Ico_insert_right (succ_le_succ hn.le), Ico_succ_right]
simp [Nat.succ_div, add_ite, add_zero, h1, filter_insert, apply_ite card, card_insert_eq_ite, IH,
Finset.mem_filter, mem_Ioc, not_le.2 (lt_add_one n)]
/-- There are exactly `⌊N/n⌋` positive multiples of `n` that are `≤ N`.
See `Nat.card_multiples` for a "shifted-by-one" version. -/
lemma card_multiples' (N n : ℕ) : #{k ∈ range N.succ | k ≠ 0 ∧ n ∣ k} = N / n := by
induction N with
| zero => simp [Finset.filter_false_of_mem]
| succ N ih =>
rw [Finset.range_succ, Finset.filter_insert]
by_cases h : n ∣ N.succ
· simp [h, succ_div_of_dvd, ih]
· simp [h, succ_div_of_not_dvd, ih]
end Nat
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Factorization/Basic.lean | 829 | 832 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.Disintegration.Density
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.WithDensity
/-!
# Radon-Nikodym derivative and Lebesgue decomposition for kernels
Let `α` and `γ` be two measurable space, where either `α` is countable or `γ` is
countably generated. Let `κ, η : Kernel α γ` be finite kernels.
Then there exists a function `Kernel.rnDeriv κ η : α → γ → ℝ≥0∞` jointly measurable on `α × γ`
and a kernel `Kernel.singularPart κ η : Kernel α γ` such that
* `κ = Kernel.withDensity η (Kernel.rnDeriv κ η) + Kernel.singularPart κ η`,
* for all `a : α`, `Kernel.singularPart κ η a ⟂ₘ η a`,
* for all `a : α`, `Kernel.singularPart κ η a = 0 ↔ κ a ≪ η a`,
* for all `a : α`, `Kernel.withDensity η (Kernel.rnDeriv κ η) a = 0 ↔ κ a ⟂ₘ η a`.
Furthermore, the sets `{a | κ a ≪ η a}` and `{a | κ a ⟂ₘ η a}` are measurable.
When `γ` is countably generated, the construction of the derivative starts from `Kernel.density`:
for two finite kernels `κ' : Kernel α (γ × β)` and `η' : Kernel α γ` with `fst κ' ≤ η'`,
the function `density κ' η' : α → γ → Set β → ℝ` is jointly measurable in the first two arguments
and satisfies that for all `a : α` and all measurable sets `s : Set β` and `A : Set γ`,
`∫ x in A, density κ' η' a x s ∂(η' a) = (κ' a (A ×ˢ s)).toReal`.
We use that definition for `β = Unit` and `κ' = map κ (fun a ↦ (a, ()))`. We can't choose `η' = η`
in general because we might not have `κ ≤ η`, but if we could, we would get a measurable function
`f` with the property `κ = withDensity η f`, which is the decomposition we want for `κ ≤ η`.
To circumvent that difficulty, we take `η' = κ + η` and thus define `rnDerivAux κ η`.
Finally, `rnDeriv κ η a x` is given by
`ENNReal.ofReal (rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x) / ENNReal.ofReal (1 - rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x)`.
Up to some conversions between `ℝ` and `ℝ≥0`, the singular part is
`withDensity (κ + η) (rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) - (1 - rnDerivAux κ (κ + η)) * rnDeriv κ η)`.
The countably generated measurable space assumption is not needed to have a decomposition for
measures, but the additional difficulty with kernels is to obtain joint measurability of the
derivative. This is why we can't simply define `rnDeriv κ η` by `a ↦ (κ a).rnDeriv (ν a)`
everywhere unless `α` is countable (although `rnDeriv κ η` has that value almost everywhere).
See the construction of `Kernel.density` for details on how the countably generated hypothesis
is used.
## Main definitions
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.rnDeriv`: a function `α → γ → ℝ≥0∞` jointly measurable on `α × γ`
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.singularPart`: a `Kernel α γ`
## Main statements
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.mutuallySingular_singularPart`: for all `a : α`,
`Kernel.singularPart κ η a ⟂ₘ η a`
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.rnDeriv_add_singularPart`:
`Kernel.withDensity η (Kernel.rnDeriv κ η) + Kernel.singularPart κ η = κ`
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.measurableSet_absolutelyContinuous` : the set `{a | κ a ≪ η a}`
is Measurable
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.measurableSet_mutuallySingular` : the set `{a | κ a ⟂ₘ η a}`
is Measurable
Uniqueness results: if `κ = η.withDensity f + ξ` for measurable `f` and `ξ` is such that
`ξ a ⟂ₘ η a` for some `a : α` then
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.eq_rnDeriv`: `f a =ᵐ[η a] Kernel.rnDeriv κ η a`
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.eq_singularPart`: `ξ a = Kernel.singularPart κ η a`
## References
Theorem 1.28 in [O. Kallenberg, Random Measures, Theory and Applications][kallenberg2017].
-/
open MeasureTheory Set Filter ENNReal
open scoped NNReal MeasureTheory Topology ProbabilityTheory
namespace ProbabilityTheory.Kernel
variable {α γ : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mγ : MeasurableSpace γ} {κ η : Kernel α γ}
[hαγ : MeasurableSpace.CountableOrCountablyGenerated α γ]
open Classical in
/-- Auxiliary function used to define `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.rnDeriv` and
`ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.singularPart`.
This has the properties we want for a Radon-Nikodym derivative only if `κ ≪ ν`. The definition of
`rnDeriv κ η` will be built from `rnDerivAux κ (κ + η)`. -/
noncomputable
def rnDerivAux (κ η : Kernel α γ) (a : α) (x : γ) : ℝ :=
if hα : Countable α then ((κ a).rnDeriv (η a) x).toReal
else haveI := hαγ.countableOrCountablyGenerated.resolve_left hα
density (map κ (fun a ↦ (a, ()))) η a x univ
lemma rnDerivAux_nonneg (hκη : κ ≤ η) {a : α} {x : γ} : 0 ≤ rnDerivAux κ η a x := by
rw [rnDerivAux]
split_ifs with hα
· exact ENNReal.toReal_nonneg
· have := hαγ.countableOrCountablyGenerated.resolve_left hα
exact density_nonneg ((fst_map_id_prod _ measurable_const).trans_le hκη) _ _ _
lemma rnDerivAux_le_one [IsFiniteKernel η] (hκη : κ ≤ η) {a : α} :
rnDerivAux κ η a ≤ᵐ[η a] 1 := by
filter_upwards [Measure.rnDeriv_le_one_of_le (hκη a)] with x hx_le_one
simp_rw [rnDerivAux]
split_ifs with hα
· refine ENNReal.toReal_le_of_le_ofReal zero_le_one ?_
simp only [Pi.one_apply, ENNReal.ofReal_one]
exact hx_le_one
· have := hαγ.countableOrCountablyGenerated.resolve_left hα
exact density_le_one ((fst_map_id_prod _ measurable_const).trans_le hκη) _ _ _
@[fun_prop]
lemma measurable_rnDerivAux (κ η : Kernel α γ) :
Measurable (fun p : α × γ ↦ Kernel.rnDerivAux κ η p.1 p.2) := by
simp_rw [rnDerivAux]
split_ifs with hα
· refine Measurable.ennreal_toReal ?_
change Measurable ((fun q : γ × α ↦ (κ q.2).rnDeriv (η q.2) q.1) ∘ Prod.swap)
refine (measurable_from_prod_countable' (fun a ↦ ?_) ?_).comp measurable_swap
· exact Measure.measurable_rnDeriv (κ a) (η a)
· intro a a' c ha'_mem_a
have h_eq : ∀ κ : Kernel α γ, κ a' = κ a := fun κ ↦ by
ext s hs
exact mem_of_mem_measurableAtom ha'_mem_a
(Kernel.measurable_coe κ hs (measurableSet_singleton (κ a s))) rfl
rw [h_eq κ, h_eq η]
· have := hαγ.countableOrCountablyGenerated.resolve_left hα
exact measurable_density _ η MeasurableSet.univ
@[fun_prop]
lemma measurable_rnDerivAux_right (κ η : Kernel α γ) (a : α) :
Measurable (fun x : γ ↦ rnDerivAux κ η a x) := by fun_prop
lemma setLIntegral_rnDerivAux (κ η : Kernel α γ) [IsFiniteKernel κ] [IsFiniteKernel η]
(a : α) {s : Set γ} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∫⁻ x in s, ENNReal.ofReal (rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x) ∂(κ + η) a = κ a s := by
have h_le : κ ≤ κ + η := le_add_of_nonneg_right bot_le
simp_rw [rnDerivAux]
split_ifs with hα
· have h_ac : κ a ≪ (κ + η) a := Measure.absolutelyContinuous_of_le (h_le a)
rw [← Measure.setLIntegral_rnDeriv h_ac]
refine setLIntegral_congr_fun hs ?_
filter_upwards [Measure.rnDeriv_lt_top (κ a) ((κ + η) a)] with x hx_lt _
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_toReal hx_lt.ne]
· have := hαγ.countableOrCountablyGenerated.resolve_left hα
rw [setLIntegral_density ((fst_map_id_prod _ measurable_const).trans_le h_le) _
MeasurableSet.univ hs, map_apply' _ (by fun_prop) _ (hs.prod MeasurableSet.univ)]
congr with x
simp
lemma withDensity_rnDerivAux (κ η : Kernel α γ) [IsFiniteKernel κ] [IsFiniteKernel η] :
withDensity (κ + η) (fun a x ↦ Real.toNNReal (rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x)) = κ := by
ext a s hs
rw [Kernel.withDensity_apply']
swap; · fun_prop
simp_rw [ofNNReal_toNNReal]
exact setLIntegral_rnDerivAux κ η a hs
lemma withDensity_one_sub_rnDerivAux (κ η : Kernel α γ) [IsFiniteKernel κ] [IsFiniteKernel η] :
withDensity (κ + η) (fun a x ↦ Real.toNNReal (1 - rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x)) = η := by
have h_le : κ ≤ κ + η := le_add_of_nonneg_right bot_le
suffices withDensity (κ + η) (fun a x ↦ Real.toNNReal (1 - rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x))
+ withDensity (κ + η) (fun a x ↦ Real.toNNReal (rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x))
= κ + η by
ext a s
have h : (withDensity (κ + η) (fun a x ↦ Real.toNNReal (1 - rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x))
+ withDensity (κ + η) (fun a x ↦ Real.toNNReal (rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x))) a s
= κ a s + η a s := by
rw [this]
simp
simp only [coe_add, Pi.add_apply, Measure.coe_add] at h
rwa [withDensity_rnDerivAux, add_comm, ENNReal.add_right_inj (measure_ne_top _ _)] at h
simp_rw [ofNNReal_toNNReal, ENNReal.ofReal_sub _ (rnDerivAux_nonneg h_le), ENNReal.ofReal_one]
rw [withDensity_sub_add_cancel]
· rw [withDensity_one']
· exact measurable_const
· fun_prop
· intro a
filter_upwards [rnDerivAux_le_one h_le] with x hx
simp only [ENNReal.ofReal_le_one]
exact hx
/-- A set of points in `α × γ` related to the absolute continuity / mutual singularity of
`κ` and `η`. -/
def mutuallySingularSet (κ η : Kernel α γ) : Set (α × γ) := {p | 1 ≤ rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) p.1 p.2}
/-- A set of points in `α × γ` related to the absolute continuity / mutual singularity of
`κ` and `η`. That is,
* `withDensity η (rnDeriv κ η) a (mutuallySingularSetSlice κ η a) = 0`,
* `singularPart κ η a (mutuallySingularSetSlice κ η a)ᶜ = 0`.
-/
def mutuallySingularSetSlice (κ η : Kernel α γ) (a : α) : Set γ :=
{x | 1 ≤ rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x}
lemma mem_mutuallySingularSetSlice (κ η : Kernel α γ) (a : α) (x : γ) :
x ∈ mutuallySingularSetSlice κ η a ↔ 1 ≤ rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x := by
rw [mutuallySingularSetSlice, mem_setOf]
lemma not_mem_mutuallySingularSetSlice (κ η : Kernel α γ) (a : α) (x : γ) :
x ∉ mutuallySingularSetSlice κ η a ↔ rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x < 1 := by
simp [mutuallySingularSetSlice]
lemma measurableSet_mutuallySingularSet (κ η : Kernel α γ) :
MeasurableSet (mutuallySingularSet κ η) :=
measurable_rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) measurableSet_Ici
lemma measurableSet_mutuallySingularSetSlice (κ η : Kernel α γ) (a : α) :
MeasurableSet (mutuallySingularSetSlice κ η a) :=
measurable_prodMk_left (measurableSet_mutuallySingularSet κ η)
lemma measure_mutuallySingularSetSlice (κ η : Kernel α γ) [IsFiniteKernel κ] [IsFiniteKernel η]
(a : α) :
η a (mutuallySingularSetSlice κ η a) = 0 := by
suffices withDensity (κ + η) (fun a x ↦ Real.toNNReal
(1 - rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x)) a {x | 1 ≤ rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x} = 0 by
rwa [withDensity_one_sub_rnDerivAux κ η] at this
simp_rw [ofNNReal_toNNReal]
rw [Kernel.withDensity_apply', lintegral_eq_zero_iff, EventuallyEq, ae_restrict_iff]
rotate_left
· exact (measurableSet_singleton 0).preimage (by fun_prop)
· fun_prop
· fun_prop
refine ae_of_all _ (fun x hx ↦ ?_)
simp only [mem_setOf_eq] at hx
simp [hx]
/-- Radon-Nikodym derivative of the kernel `κ` with respect to the kernel `η`. -/
noncomputable
irreducible_def rnDeriv (κ η : Kernel α γ) (a : α) (x : γ) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
ENNReal.ofReal (rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x) / ENNReal.ofReal (1 - rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x)
lemma rnDeriv_def' (κ η : Kernel α γ) :
rnDeriv κ η = fun a x ↦ ENNReal.ofReal (rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x)
/ ENNReal.ofReal (1 - rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x) := by ext; rw [rnDeriv_def]
@[fun_prop]
lemma measurable_rnDeriv (κ η : Kernel α γ) :
Measurable (fun p : α × γ ↦ rnDeriv κ η p.1 p.2) := by
simp_rw [rnDeriv_def]
exact (measurable_rnDerivAux κ _).ennreal_ofReal.div
(measurable_const.sub (measurable_rnDerivAux κ _)).ennreal_ofReal
@[fun_prop]
lemma measurable_rnDeriv_right (κ η : Kernel α γ) (a : α) :
Measurable (fun x : γ ↦ rnDeriv κ η a x) := by fun_prop
lemma rnDeriv_eq_top_iff (κ η : Kernel α γ) (a : α) (x : γ) :
rnDeriv κ η a x = ∞ ↔ (a, x) ∈ mutuallySingularSet κ η := by
simp only [rnDeriv, ENNReal.div_eq_top, ne_eq, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero, not_le,
tsub_le_iff_right, zero_add, ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top, not_false_eq_true, and_true, or_false,
mutuallySingularSet, mem_setOf_eq, and_iff_right_iff_imp]
exact fun h ↦ zero_lt_one.trans_le h
lemma rnDeriv_eq_top_iff' (κ η : Kernel α γ) (a : α) (x : γ) :
rnDeriv κ η a x = ∞ ↔ x ∈ mutuallySingularSetSlice κ η a := by
rw [rnDeriv_eq_top_iff, mutuallySingularSet, mutuallySingularSetSlice, mem_setOf, mem_setOf]
/-- Singular part of the kernel `κ` with respect to the kernel `η`. -/
noncomputable
irreducible_def singularPart (κ η : Kernel α γ) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] [IsSFiniteKernel η] :
Kernel α γ :=
withDensity (κ + η) (fun a x ↦ Real.toNNReal (rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x)
- Real.toNNReal (1 - rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x) * rnDeriv κ η a x)
lemma measurable_singularPart_fun (κ η : Kernel α γ) :
Measurable (fun p : α × γ ↦ Real.toNNReal (rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) p.1 p.2)
- Real.toNNReal (1 - rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) p.1 p.2) * rnDeriv κ η p.1 p.2) := by fun_prop
lemma measurable_singularPart_fun_right (κ η : Kernel α γ) (a : α) :
Measurable (fun x : γ ↦ Real.toNNReal (rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x)
- Real.toNNReal (1 - rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x) * rnDeriv κ η a x) := by
change Measurable ((Function.uncurry fun a b ↦
ENNReal.ofReal (rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a b)
- ENNReal.ofReal (1 - rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a b) * rnDeriv κ η a b) ∘ (fun b ↦ (a, b)))
exact (measurable_singularPart_fun κ η).comp measurable_prodMk_left
lemma singularPart_compl_mutuallySingularSetSlice (κ η : Kernel α γ) [IsSFiniteKernel κ]
[IsSFiniteKernel η] (a : α) :
singularPart κ η a (mutuallySingularSetSlice κ η a)ᶜ = 0 := by
rw [singularPart, Kernel.withDensity_apply', lintegral_eq_zero_iff, EventuallyEq,
ae_restrict_iff]
all_goals simp_rw [ofNNReal_toNNReal]
rotate_left
· exact measurableSet_preimage (measurable_singularPart_fun_right κ η a)
(measurableSet_singleton _)
· exact measurable_singularPart_fun_right κ η a
· exact measurable_singularPart_fun κ η
refine ae_of_all _ (fun x hx ↦ ?_)
simp only [mem_compl_iff, mutuallySingularSetSlice, mem_setOf, not_le] at hx
simp_rw [rnDeriv]
rw [← ENNReal.ofReal_div_of_pos, div_eq_inv_mul, ← ENNReal.ofReal_mul, ← mul_assoc,
mul_inv_cancel₀, one_mul, tsub_self, Pi.zero_apply]
· simp only [ne_eq, sub_eq_zero, hx.ne', not_false_eq_true]
· simp only [sub_nonneg, hx.le]
· simp only [sub_pos, hx]
lemma singularPart_of_subset_compl_mutuallySingularSetSlice [IsFiniteKernel κ]
[IsFiniteKernel η] {a : α} {s : Set γ} (hs : s ⊆ (mutuallySingularSetSlice κ η a)ᶜ) :
singularPart κ η a s = 0 :=
measure_mono_null hs (singularPart_compl_mutuallySingularSetSlice κ η a)
lemma singularPart_of_subset_mutuallySingularSetSlice [IsFiniteKernel κ]
[IsFiniteKernel η] {a : α} {s : Set γ} (hsm : MeasurableSet s)
(hs : s ⊆ mutuallySingularSetSlice κ η a) :
singularPart κ η a s = κ a s := by
have hs' : ∀ x ∈ s, 1 ≤ rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x := fun _ hx ↦ hs hx
rw [singularPart, Kernel.withDensity_apply']
swap; · exact measurable_singularPart_fun κ η
calc
∫⁻ x in s, ↑(Real.toNNReal (rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x)) -
↑(Real.toNNReal (1 - rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x)) * rnDeriv κ η a x
∂(κ + η) a
= ∫⁻ _ in s, 1 ∂(κ + η) a := by
refine setLIntegral_congr_fun hsm ?_
have h_le : κ ≤ κ + η := le_add_of_nonneg_right bot_le
filter_upwards [rnDerivAux_le_one h_le] with x hx hxs
have h_eq_one : rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x = 1 := le_antisymm hx (hs' x hxs)
simp [h_eq_one]
_ = (κ + η) a s := by simp
_ = κ a s := by
suffices η a s = 0 by simp [this]
exact measure_mono_null hs (measure_mutuallySingularSetSlice κ η a)
lemma withDensity_rnDeriv_mutuallySingularSetSlice (κ η : Kernel α γ) [IsFiniteKernel κ]
[IsFiniteKernel η] (a : α) :
withDensity η (rnDeriv κ η) a (mutuallySingularSetSlice κ η a) = 0 := by
rw [Kernel.withDensity_apply']
· exact setLIntegral_measure_zero _ _ (measure_mutuallySingularSetSlice κ η a)
· exact measurable_rnDeriv κ η
lemma withDensity_rnDeriv_of_subset_mutuallySingularSetSlice [IsFiniteKernel κ]
[IsFiniteKernel η] {a : α} {s : Set γ}
(hs : s ⊆ mutuallySingularSetSlice κ η a) :
withDensity η (rnDeriv κ η) a s = 0 :=
measure_mono_null hs (withDensity_rnDeriv_mutuallySingularSetSlice κ η a)
lemma withDensity_rnDeriv_of_subset_compl_mutuallySingularSetSlice
[IsFiniteKernel κ] [IsFiniteKernel η] {a : α} {s : Set γ} (hsm : MeasurableSet s)
(hs : s ⊆ (mutuallySingularSetSlice κ η a)ᶜ) :
withDensity η (rnDeriv κ η) a s = κ a s := by
have : withDensity η (rnDeriv κ η)
= withDensity (withDensity (κ + η)
(fun a x ↦ Real.toNNReal (1 - rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x))) (rnDeriv κ η) := by
rw [rnDeriv_def']
congr
exact (withDensity_one_sub_rnDerivAux κ η).symm
rw [this, ← withDensity_mul, Kernel.withDensity_apply']
rotate_left
· fun_prop
· fun_prop
· exact measurable_rnDeriv _ _
simp_rw [rnDeriv]
have hs' : ∀ x ∈ s, rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x < 1 := by
simp_rw [← not_mem_mutuallySingularSetSlice]
exact fun x hx hx_mem ↦ hs hx hx_mem
calc
∫⁻ x in s, ↑(Real.toNNReal (1 - rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x)) *
(ENNReal.ofReal (rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x) /
ENNReal.ofReal (1 - rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x)) ∂(κ + η) a
_ = ∫⁻ x in s, ENNReal.ofReal (rnDerivAux κ (κ + η) a x) ∂(κ + η) a := by
refine setLIntegral_congr_fun hsm (ae_of_all _ fun x hx ↦ ?_)
rw [ofNNReal_toNNReal, ← ENNReal.ofReal_div_of_pos, div_eq_inv_mul, ← ENNReal.ofReal_mul,
← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel₀, one_mul]
· rw [ne_eq, sub_eq_zero]
exact (hs' x hx).ne'
· simp [(hs' x hx).le]
· simp [hs' x hx]
_ = κ a s := setLIntegral_rnDerivAux κ η a hsm
/-- The singular part of `κ` with respect to `η` is mutually singular with `η`. -/
lemma mutuallySingular_singularPart (κ η : Kernel α γ) [IsFiniteKernel κ] [IsFiniteKernel η]
(a : α) :
singularPart κ η a ⟂ₘ η a := by
symm
exact ⟨mutuallySingularSetSlice κ η a, measurableSet_mutuallySingularSetSlice κ η a,
measure_mutuallySingularSetSlice κ η a, singularPart_compl_mutuallySingularSetSlice κ η a⟩
/-- Lebesgue decomposition of a finite kernel `κ` with respect to another one `η`.
`κ` is the sum of an absolutely continuous part `withDensity η (rnDeriv κ η)` and a singular part
`singularPart κ η`. -/
lemma rnDeriv_add_singularPart (κ η : Kernel α γ) [IsFiniteKernel κ] [IsFiniteKernel η] :
withDensity η (rnDeriv κ η) + singularPart κ η = κ := by
ext a s hs
rw [← inter_union_diff s (mutuallySingularSetSlice κ η a)]
simp only [coe_add, Pi.add_apply, Measure.coe_add]
have hm := measurableSet_mutuallySingularSetSlice κ η a
simp only [measure_union (Disjoint.mono inter_subset_right le_rfl disjoint_sdiff_right)
(hs.diff hm)]
rw [singularPart_of_subset_mutuallySingularSetSlice (hs.inter hm) inter_subset_right,
singularPart_of_subset_compl_mutuallySingularSetSlice (diff_subset_iff.mpr (by simp)),
add_zero, withDensity_rnDeriv_of_subset_mutuallySingularSetSlice inter_subset_right,
zero_add, withDensity_rnDeriv_of_subset_compl_mutuallySingularSetSlice (hs.diff hm)
(diff_subset_iff.mpr (by simp)), add_comm]
section EqZeroIff
lemma singularPart_eq_zero_iff_apply_eq_zero (κ η : Kernel α γ) [IsFiniteKernel κ]
[IsFiniteKernel η] (a : α) :
singularPart κ η a = 0 ↔ singularPart κ η a (mutuallySingularSetSlice κ η a) = 0 := by
rw [← Measure.measure_univ_eq_zero]
have : univ = (mutuallySingularSetSlice κ η a) ∪ (mutuallySingularSetSlice κ η a)ᶜ := by simp
rw [this, measure_union disjoint_compl_right (measurableSet_mutuallySingularSetSlice κ η a).compl,
singularPart_compl_mutuallySingularSetSlice, add_zero]
lemma withDensity_rnDeriv_eq_zero_iff_apply_eq_zero (κ η : Kernel α γ) [IsFiniteKernel κ]
[IsFiniteKernel η] (a : α) :
withDensity η (rnDeriv κ η) a = 0
↔ withDensity η (rnDeriv κ η) a (mutuallySingularSetSlice κ η a)ᶜ = 0 := by
rw [← Measure.measure_univ_eq_zero]
have : univ = (mutuallySingularSetSlice κ η a) ∪ (mutuallySingularSetSlice κ η a)ᶜ := by simp
rw [this, measure_union disjoint_compl_right (measurableSet_mutuallySingularSetSlice κ η a).compl,
withDensity_rnDeriv_mutuallySingularSetSlice, zero_add]
lemma singularPart_eq_zero_iff_absolutelyContinuous (κ η : Kernel α γ)
[IsFiniteKernel κ] [IsFiniteKernel η] (a : α) :
singularPart κ η a = 0 ↔ κ a ≪ η a := by
conv_rhs => rw [← rnDeriv_add_singularPart κ η, coe_add, Pi.add_apply]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [h, add_zero]
exact withDensity_absolutelyContinuous _ _
rw [Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous.add_left_iff] at h
exact Measure.eq_zero_of_absolutelyContinuous_of_mutuallySingular h.2
(mutuallySingular_singularPart _ _ _)
lemma withDensity_rnDeriv_eq_zero_iff_mutuallySingular (κ η : Kernel α γ)
| [IsFiniteKernel κ] [IsFiniteKernel η] (a : α) :
withDensity η (rnDeriv κ η) a = 0 ↔ κ a ⟂ₘ η a := by
conv_rhs => rw [← rnDeriv_add_singularPart κ η, coe_add, Pi.add_apply]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [h, zero_add]
exact mutuallySingular_singularPart _ _ _
rw [Measure.MutuallySingular.add_left_iff] at h
rw [← Measure.MutuallySingular.self_iff]
| Mathlib/Probability/Kernel/RadonNikodym.lean | 424 | 431 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Data.SProd
/-!
# Sets in product and pi types
This file proves basic properties of product of sets in `α × β` and in `Π i, α i`, and of the
diagonal of a type.
## Main declarations
This file contains basic results on the following notions, which are defined in `Set.Operations`.
* `Set.prod`: Binary product of sets. For `s : Set α`, `t : Set β`, we have
`s.prod t : Set (α × β)`. Denoted by `s ×ˢ t`.
* `Set.diagonal`: Diagonal of a type. `Set.diagonal α = {(x, x) | x : α}`.
* `Set.offDiag`: Off-diagonal. `s ×ˢ s` without the diagonal.
* `Set.pi`: Arbitrary product of sets.
-/
open Function
namespace Set
/-! ### Cartesian binary product of sets -/
section Prod
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {t t₁ t₂ : Set β} {a : α} {b : β}
theorem Subsingleton.prod (hs : s.Subsingleton) (ht : t.Subsingleton) :
(s ×ˢ t).Subsingleton := fun _x hx _y hy ↦
Prod.ext (hs hx.1 hy.1) (ht hx.2 hy.2)
noncomputable instance decidableMemProd [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] :
DecidablePred (· ∈ s ×ˢ t) := fun x => inferInstanceAs (Decidable (x.1 ∈ s ∧ x.2 ∈ t))
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ t₂ :=
fun _ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨hs h₁, ht h₂⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_left (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ×ˢ t ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ t :=
prod_mono hs Subset.rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_right (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s ×ˢ t₁ ⊆ s ×ˢ t₂ :=
prod_mono Subset.rfl ht
@[simp]
theorem prod_self_subset_prod_self : s₁ ×ˢ s₁ ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
⟨fun h _ hx => (h (mk_mem_prod hx hx)).1, fun h _ hx => ⟨h hx.1, h hx.2⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem prod_self_ssubset_prod_self : s₁ ×ˢ s₁ ⊂ s₂ ×ˢ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ :=
and_congr prod_self_subset_prod_self <| not_congr prod_self_subset_prod_self
theorem prod_subset_iff {P : Set (α × β)} : s ×ˢ t ⊆ P ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ P :=
⟨fun h _ hx _ hy => h (mk_mem_prod hx hy), fun h ⟨_, _⟩ hp => h _ hp.1 _ hp.2⟩
theorem forall_prod_set {p : α × β → Prop} : (∀ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, p x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, p (x, y) :=
prod_subset_iff
theorem exists_prod_set {p : α × β → Prop} : (∃ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, p x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, p (x, y) := by
simp [and_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem prod_empty : s ×ˢ (∅ : Set β) = ∅ := by
ext
exact iff_of_eq (and_false _)
@[simp]
theorem empty_prod : (∅ : Set α) ×ˢ t = ∅ := by
ext
exact iff_of_eq (false_and _)
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem univ_prod_univ : @univ α ×ˢ @univ β = univ := by
ext
exact iff_of_eq (true_and _)
theorem univ_prod {t : Set β} : (univ : Set α) ×ˢ t = Prod.snd ⁻¹' t := by simp [prod_eq]
theorem prod_univ {s : Set α} : s ×ˢ (univ : Set β) = Prod.fst ⁻¹' s := by simp [prod_eq]
@[simp] lemma prod_eq_univ [Nonempty α] [Nonempty β] : s ×ˢ t = univ ↔ s = univ ∧ t = univ := by
simp [eq_univ_iff_forall, forall_and]
theorem singleton_prod : ({a} : Set α) ×ˢ t = Prod.mk a '' t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm, eq_comm]
theorem prod_singleton : s ×ˢ ({b} : Set β) = (fun a => (a, b)) '' s := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem singleton_prod_singleton : ({a} : Set α) ×ˢ ({b} : Set β) = {(a, b)} := by ext ⟨c, d⟩; simp
@[simp]
theorem union_prod : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t ∪ s₂ ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [or_and_right]
@[simp]
theorem prod_union : s ×ˢ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s ×ˢ t₁ ∪ s ×ˢ t₂ := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_or_left]
theorem inter_prod : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t ∩ s₂ ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [← and_and_right, mem_inter_iff, mem_prod]
theorem prod_inter : s ×ˢ (t₁ ∩ t₂) = s ×ˢ t₁ ∩ s ×ˢ t₂ := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [← and_and_left, mem_inter_iff, mem_prod]
@[mfld_simps]
theorem prod_inter_prod : s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ∩ s₂ ×ˢ t₂ = (s₁ ∩ s₂) ×ˢ (t₁ ∩ t₂) := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_assoc, and_left_comm]
lemma compl_prod_eq_union {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
(s ×ˢ t)ᶜ = (sᶜ ×ˢ univ) ∪ (univ ×ˢ tᶜ) := by
ext p
simp only [mem_compl_iff, mem_prod, not_and, mem_union, mem_univ, and_true, true_and]
constructor <;> intro h
· by_cases fst_in_s : p.fst ∈ s
· exact Or.inr (h fst_in_s)
· exact Or.inl fst_in_s
· intro fst_in_s
simpa only [fst_in_s, not_true, false_or] using h
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_prod : Disjoint (s₁ ×ˢ t₁) (s₂ ×ˢ t₂) ↔ Disjoint s₁ s₂ ∨ Disjoint t₁ t₂ := by
simp_rw [disjoint_left, mem_prod, not_and_or, Prod.forall, and_imp, ← @forall_or_right α, ←
@forall_or_left β, ← @forall_or_right (_ ∈ s₁), ← @forall_or_left (_ ∈ t₁)]
theorem Disjoint.set_prod_left (hs : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (t₁ t₂ : Set β) :
Disjoint (s₁ ×ˢ t₁) (s₂ ×ˢ t₂) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun ⟨_a, _b⟩ ⟨ha₁, _⟩ ⟨ha₂, _⟩ => disjoint_left.1 hs ha₁ ha₂
theorem Disjoint.set_prod_right (ht : Disjoint t₁ t₂) (s₁ s₂ : Set α) :
Disjoint (s₁ ×ˢ t₁) (s₂ ×ˢ t₂) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun ⟨_a, _b⟩ ⟨_, hb₁⟩ ⟨_, hb₂⟩ => disjoint_left.1 ht hb₁ hb₂
theorem prodMap_image_prod (f : α → β) (g : γ → δ) (s : Set α) (t : Set γ) :
(Prod.map f g) '' (s ×ˢ t) = (f '' s) ×ˢ (g '' t) := by
ext
aesop
theorem insert_prod : insert a s ×ˢ t = Prod.mk a '' t ∪ s ×ˢ t := by
simp only [insert_eq, union_prod, singleton_prod]
theorem prod_insert : s ×ˢ insert b t = (fun a => (a, b)) '' s ∪ s ×ˢ t := by
simp only [insert_eq, prod_union, prod_singleton]
theorem prod_preimage_eq {f : γ → α} {g : δ → β} :
(f ⁻¹' s) ×ˢ (g ⁻¹' t) = (fun p : γ × δ => (f p.1, g p.2)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t :=
rfl
theorem prod_preimage_left {f : γ → α} :
(f ⁻¹' s) ×ˢ t = (fun p : γ × β => (f p.1, p.2)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t :=
rfl
theorem prod_preimage_right {g : δ → β} :
s ×ˢ (g ⁻¹' t) = (fun p : α × δ => (p.1, g p.2)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t :=
rfl
theorem preimage_prod_map_prod (f : α → β) (g : γ → δ) (s : Set β) (t : Set δ) :
Prod.map f g ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = (f ⁻¹' s) ×ˢ (g ⁻¹' t) :=
rfl
theorem mk_preimage_prod (f : γ → α) (g : γ → β) :
(fun x => (f x, g x)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = f ⁻¹' s ∩ g ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
| @[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left (hb : b ∈ t) : (fun a => (a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = s := by
ext a
simp [hb]
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right (ha : a ∈ s) : Prod.mk a ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = t := by
ext b
simp [ha]
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_empty (hb : b ∉ t) : (fun a => (a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = ∅ := by
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Prod.lean | 185 | 196 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Complex
import Qq
/-! # Power function on `ℝ`
We construct the power functions `x ^ y`, where `x` and `y` are real numbers.
-/
noncomputable section
open Real ComplexConjugate Finset Set
/-
## Definitions
-/
namespace Real
variable {x y z : ℝ}
/-- The real power function `x ^ y`, defined as the real part of the complex power function.
For `x > 0`, it is equal to `exp (y log x)`. For `x = 0`, one sets `0 ^ 0=1` and `0 ^ y=0` for
`y ≠ 0`. For `x < 0`, the definition is somewhat arbitrary as it depends on the choice of a complex
determination of the logarithm. With our conventions, it is equal to `exp (y log x) cos (π y)`. -/
noncomputable def rpow (x y : ℝ) :=
((x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ)).re
noncomputable instance : Pow ℝ ℝ := ⟨rpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_pow (x y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y := rfl
theorem rpow_def (x y : ℝ) : x ^ y = ((x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ)).re := rfl
theorem rpow_def_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) :
x ^ y = if x = 0 then if y = 0 then 1 else 0 else exp (log x * y) := by
simp only [rpow_def, Complex.cpow_def]; split_ifs <;>
simp_all [(Complex.ofReal_log hx).symm, -Complex.ofReal_mul,
(Complex.ofReal_mul _ _).symm, Complex.exp_ofReal_re, Complex.ofReal_eq_zero]
theorem rpow_def_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) := by
rw [rpow_def_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hx), if_neg (ne_of_gt hx)]
theorem exp_mul (x y : ℝ) : exp (x * y) = exp x ^ y := by rw [rpow_def_of_pos (exp_pos _), log_exp]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem rpow_intCast (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by
simp only [rpow_def, ← Complex.ofReal_zpow, Complex.cpow_intCast, Complex.ofReal_intCast,
Complex.ofReal_re]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem rpow_natCast (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by simpa using rpow_intCast x n
@[simp]
theorem exp_one_rpow (x : ℝ) : exp 1 ^ x = exp x := by rw [← exp_mul, one_mul]
@[simp] lemma exp_one_pow (n : ℕ) : exp 1 ^ n = exp n := by rw [← rpow_natCast, exp_one_rpow]
theorem rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg (hx : 0 ≤ x) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 := by
simp only [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]
split_ifs <;> simp [*, exp_ne_zero]
@[simp]
lemma rpow_eq_zero (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
simp [rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg, *]
@[simp]
lemma rpow_ne_zero (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : x ^ y ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
Real.rpow_eq_zero hx hy |>.not
open Real
theorem rpow_def_of_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x < 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) * cos (y * π) := by
rw [rpow_def, Complex.cpow_def, if_neg]
· have : Complex.log x * y = ↑(log (-x) * y) + ↑(y * π) * Complex.I := by
simp only [Complex.log, Complex.norm_real, norm_eq_abs, abs_of_neg hx, log_neg_eq_log,
Complex.arg_ofReal_of_neg hx, Complex.ofReal_mul]
ring
rw [this, Complex.exp_add_mul_I, ← Complex.ofReal_exp, ← Complex.ofReal_cos, ←
Complex.ofReal_sin, mul_add, ← Complex.ofReal_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← Complex.ofReal_mul,
Complex.add_re, Complex.ofReal_re, Complex.mul_re, Complex.I_re, Complex.ofReal_im,
Real.log_neg_eq_log]
ring
· rw [Complex.ofReal_eq_zero]
exact ne_of_lt hx
theorem rpow_def_of_nonpos {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) (y : ℝ) :
x ^ y = if x = 0 then if y = 0 then 1 else 0 else exp (log x * y) * cos (y * π) := by
split_ifs with h <;> simp [rpow_def, *]; exact rpow_def_of_neg (lt_of_le_of_ne hx h) _
@[bound]
theorem rpow_pos_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : 0 < x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx]; apply exp_pos
@[simp]
theorem rpow_zero (x : ℝ) : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 := by simp [rpow_def]
theorem rpow_zero_pos (x : ℝ) : 0 < x ^ (0 : ℝ) := by simp
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow {x : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℝ) ^ x = 0 := by simp [rpow_def, *]
theorem zero_rpow_eq_iff {x : ℝ} {a : ℝ} : 0 ^ x = a ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ a = 0 ∨ x = 0 ∧ a = 1 := by
constructor
· intro hyp
simp only [rpow_def, Complex.ofReal_zero] at hyp
by_cases h : x = 0
· subst h
simp only [Complex.one_re, Complex.ofReal_zero, Complex.cpow_zero] at hyp
exact Or.inr ⟨rfl, hyp.symm⟩
· rw [Complex.zero_cpow (Complex.ofReal_ne_zero.mpr h)] at hyp
exact Or.inl ⟨h, hyp.symm⟩
· rintro (⟨h, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)
· exact zero_rpow h
· exact rpow_zero _
theorem eq_zero_rpow_iff {x : ℝ} {a : ℝ} : a = 0 ^ x ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ a = 0 ∨ x = 0 ∧ a = 1 := by
rw [← zero_rpow_eq_iff, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem rpow_one (x : ℝ) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x := by simp [rpow_def]
@[simp]
theorem one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ) ^ x = 1 := by simp [rpow_def]
theorem zero_rpow_le_one (x : ℝ) : (0 : ℝ) ^ x ≤ 1 := by
by_cases h : x = 0 <;> simp [h, zero_le_one]
theorem zero_rpow_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ (0 : ℝ) ^ x := by
by_cases h : x = 0 <;> simp [h, zero_le_one]
@[bound]
theorem rpow_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : 0 ≤ x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]; split_ifs <;>
simp only [zero_le_one, le_refl, le_of_lt (exp_pos _)]
theorem abs_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx_nonneg : 0 ≤ x) : |x ^ y| = |x| ^ y := by
have h_rpow_nonneg : 0 ≤ x ^ y := Real.rpow_nonneg hx_nonneg _
rw [abs_eq_self.mpr hx_nonneg, abs_eq_self.mpr h_rpow_nonneg]
@[bound]
theorem abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow (x y : ℝ) : |x ^ y| ≤ |x| ^ y := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 x with hx | hx
· rw [abs_rpow_of_nonneg hx]
· rw [abs_of_neg hx, rpow_def_of_neg hx, rpow_def_of_pos (neg_pos.2 hx), log_neg_eq_log, abs_mul,
abs_of_pos (exp_pos _)]
exact mul_le_of_le_one_right (exp_pos _).le (abs_cos_le_one _)
theorem abs_rpow_le_exp_log_mul (x y : ℝ) : |x ^ y| ≤ exp (log x * y) := by
refine (abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow x y).trans ?_
by_cases hx : x = 0
· by_cases hy : y = 0 <;> simp [hx, hy, zero_le_one]
· rw [rpow_def_of_pos (abs_pos.2 hx), log_abs]
lemma rpow_inv_log (hx₀ : 0 < x) (hx₁ : x ≠ 1) : x ^ (log x)⁻¹ = exp 1 := by
rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx₀, mul_inv_cancel₀]
exact log_ne_zero.2 ⟨hx₀.ne', hx₁, (hx₀.trans' <| by norm_num).ne'⟩
/-- See `Real.rpow_inv_log` for the equality when `x ≠ 1` is strictly positive. -/
lemma rpow_inv_log_le_exp_one : x ^ (log x)⁻¹ ≤ exp 1 := by
calc
_ ≤ |x ^ (log x)⁻¹| := le_abs_self _
_ ≤ |x| ^ (log x)⁻¹ := abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow ..
rw [← log_abs]
obtain hx | hx := (abs_nonneg x).eq_or_gt
· simp [hx]
· rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx]
gcongr
exact mul_inv_le_one
theorem norm_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx_nonneg : 0 ≤ x) : ‖x ^ y‖ = ‖x‖ ^ y := by
simp_rw [Real.norm_eq_abs]
exact abs_rpow_of_nonneg hx_nonneg
variable {w x y z : ℝ}
theorem rpow_add (hx : 0 < x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
simp only [rpow_def_of_pos hx, mul_add, exp_add]
theorem rpow_add' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : y + z ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | pos)
· rw [zero_rpow h, zero_eq_mul]
have : y ≠ 0 ∨ z ≠ 0 := not_and_or.1 fun ⟨hy, hz⟩ => h <| hy.symm ▸ hz.symm ▸ zero_add 0
exact this.imp zero_rpow zero_rpow
· exact rpow_add pos _ _
/-- Variant of `Real.rpow_add'` that avoids having to prove `y + z = w` twice. -/
lemma rpow_of_add_eq (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hw : w ≠ 0) (h : y + z = w) : x ^ w = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rw [← h, rpow_add' hx]; rwa [h]
theorem rpow_add_of_nonneg (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 ≤ z) :
x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rcases hy.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hy)
· rw [zero_add, rpow_zero, one_mul]
exact rpow_add' hx (ne_of_gt <| add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg hy hz)
/-- For `0 ≤ x`, the only problematic case in the equality `x ^ y * x ^ z = x ^ (y + z)` is for
`x = 0` and `y + z = 0`, where the right hand side is `1` while the left hand side can vanish.
The inequality is always true, though, and given in this lemma. -/
theorem le_rpow_add {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ y * x ^ z ≤ x ^ (y + z) := by
rcases le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 hx with (H | pos)
· by_cases h : y + z = 0
· simp only [H.symm, h, rpow_zero]
calc
(0 : ℝ) ^ y * 0 ^ z ≤ 1 * 1 :=
mul_le_mul (zero_rpow_le_one y) (zero_rpow_le_one z) (zero_rpow_nonneg z) zero_le_one
_ = 1 := by simp
· simp [rpow_add', ← H, h]
· simp [rpow_add pos]
theorem rpow_sum_of_pos {ι : Type*} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a) (f : ι → ℝ) (s : Finset ι) :
(a ^ ∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, a ^ f x :=
map_sum (⟨⟨fun (x : ℝ) => (a ^ x : ℝ), rpow_zero a⟩, rpow_add ha⟩ : ℝ →+ (Additive ℝ)) f s
theorem rpow_sum_of_nonneg {ι : Type*} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → ℝ}
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 ≤ f x) : (a ^ ∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, a ^ f x := by
induction' s using Finset.cons_induction with i s hi ihs
· rw [sum_empty, Finset.prod_empty, rpow_zero]
· rw [forall_mem_cons] at h
rw [sum_cons, prod_cons, ← ihs h.2, rpow_add_of_nonneg ha h.1 (sum_nonneg h.2)]
theorem rpow_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (-y) = (x ^ y)⁻¹ := by
simp only [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]; split_ifs <;> simp_all [exp_neg]
theorem rpow_sub {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, rpow_add hx, rpow_neg (le_of_lt hx), div_eq_mul_inv]
theorem rpow_sub' {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) {y z : ℝ} (h : y - z ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg] at h ⊢
simp only [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_neg hx, div_eq_mul_inv]
protected theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.rpow_const {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → ℝ}
(hf : HasCompactSupport f) {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) : HasCompactSupport (fun x ↦ f x ^ r) :=
hf.comp_left (g := (· ^ r)) (Real.zero_rpow hr)
end Real
/-!
## Comparing real and complex powers
-/
namespace Complex
theorem ofReal_cpow {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : ((x ^ y : ℝ) : ℂ) = (x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ) := by
simp only [Real.rpow_def_of_nonneg hx, Complex.cpow_def, ofReal_eq_zero]; split_ifs <;>
simp [Complex.ofReal_log hx]
theorem ofReal_cpow_of_nonpos {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) (y : ℂ) :
(x : ℂ) ^ y = (-x : ℂ) ^ y * exp (π * I * y) := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hlt)
· rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with (rfl | hy) <;> simp [*]
have hne : (x : ℂ) ≠ 0 := ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hlt.ne
rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hne, cpow_def_of_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.2 hne), ← exp_add, ← add_mul, log,
log, norm_neg, arg_ofReal_of_neg hlt, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_nonneg (neg_nonneg.2 hx),
ofReal_zero, zero_mul, add_zero]
lemma cpow_ofReal (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) :
x ^ (y : ℂ) = ↑(‖x‖ ^ y) * (Real.cos (arg x * y) + Real.sin (arg x * y) * I) := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with rfl | hx
· simp [ofReal_cpow le_rfl]
· rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hx, exp_eq_exp_re_mul_sin_add_cos, mul_comm (log x)]
norm_cast
rw [re_ofReal_mul, im_ofReal_mul, log_re, log_im, mul_comm y, mul_comm y, Real.exp_mul,
Real.exp_log]
rwa [norm_pos_iff]
lemma cpow_ofReal_re (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) : (x ^ (y : ℂ)).re = ‖x‖ ^ y * Real.cos (arg x * y) := by
rw [cpow_ofReal]; generalize arg x * y = z; simp [Real.cos]
lemma cpow_ofReal_im (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) : (x ^ (y : ℂ)).im = ‖x‖ ^ y * Real.sin (arg x * y) := by
rw [cpow_ofReal]; generalize arg x * y = z; simp [Real.sin]
theorem norm_cpow_of_ne_zero {z : ℂ} (hz : z ≠ 0) (w : ℂ) :
‖z ^ w‖ = ‖z‖ ^ w.re / Real.exp (arg z * im w) := by
rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hz, norm_exp, mul_re, log_re, log_im, Real.exp_sub,
Real.rpow_def_of_pos (norm_pos_iff.mpr hz)]
|
theorem norm_cpow_of_imp {z w : ℂ} (h : z = 0 → w.re = 0 → w = 0) :
‖z ^ w‖ = ‖z‖ ^ w.re / Real.exp (arg z * im w) := by
rcases ne_or_eq z 0 with (hz | rfl) <;> [exact norm_cpow_of_ne_zero hz w; rw [norm_zero]]
rcases eq_or_ne w.re 0 with hw | hw
· simp [hw, h rfl hw]
· rw [Real.zero_rpow hw, zero_div, zero_cpow, norm_zero]
exact ne_of_apply_ne re hw
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/Real.lean | 284 | 291 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Josha Dekker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Josha Dekker
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Bases
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.CountableInter
import Mathlib.Topology.Compactness.SigmaCompact
/-!
# Lindelöf sets and Lindelöf spaces
## Main definitions
We define the following properties for sets in a topological space:
* `IsLindelof s`: Two definitions are possible here. The more standard definition is that
every open cover that contains `s` contains a countable subcover. We choose for the equivalent
definition where we require that every nontrivial filter on `s` with the countable intersection
property has a clusterpoint. Equivalence is established in `isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`.
* `LindelofSpace X`: `X` is Lindelöf if it is Lindelöf as a set.
* `NonLindelofSpace`: a space that is not a Lindëlof space, e.g. the Long Line.
## Main results
* `isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`: A set is Lindelöf iff every open cover has a
countable subcover.
## Implementation details
* This API is mainly based on the API for IsCompact and follows notation and style as much
as possible.
-/
open Set Filter Topology TopologicalSpace
universe u v
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {ι : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {s t : Set X}
section Lindelof
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if every nontrivial filter `f` with the countable intersection
property that contains `s`, has a clusterpoint in `s`. The filter-free definition is given by
`isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`. -/
def IsLindelof (s : Set X) :=
∀ ⦃f⦄ [NeBot f] [CountableInterFilter f], f ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f
/-- The complement to a Lindelöf set belongs to a filter `f` with the countable intersection
property if it belongs to each filter `𝓝 x ⊓ f`, `x ∈ s`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.compl_mem_sets (hs : IsLindelof s) {f : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter f]
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, sᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x ⊓ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
contrapose! hf
simp only [not_mem_iff_inf_principal_compl, compl_compl, inf_assoc] at hf ⊢
exact hs inf_le_right
/-- The complement to a Lindelöf set belongs to a filter `f` with the countable intersection
property if each `x ∈ s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `tᶜ` belongs to `f`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (hs : IsLindelof s) {f : Filter X}
[CountableInterFilter f] (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, tᶜ ∈ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
refine hs.compl_mem_sets fun x hx ↦ ?_
rw [← disjoint_principal_right, disjoint_right_comm, (basis_sets _).disjoint_iff_left]
exact hf x hx
/-- If `p : Set X → Prop` is stable under restriction and union, and each point `x`
of a Lindelöf set `s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `p t`, then `p s` holds. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem IsLindelof.induction_on (hs : IsLindelof s) {p : Set X → Prop}
(hmono : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, s ⊆ t → p t → p s)
(hcountable_union : ∀ (S : Set (Set X)), S.Countable → (∀ s ∈ S, p s) → p (⋃₀ S))
(hnhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, p t) : p s := by
let f : Filter X := ofCountableUnion p hcountable_union (fun t ht _ hsub ↦ hmono hsub ht)
have : sᶜ ∈ f := hs.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (by simpa [f] using hnhds)
rwa [← compl_compl s]
/-- The intersection of a Lindelöf set and a closed set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.inter_right (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsClosed t) : IsLindelof (s ∩ t) := by
intro f hnf _ hstf
rw [← inf_principal, le_inf_iff] at hstf
obtain ⟨x, hsx, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f := hs hstf.1
have hxt : x ∈ t := ht.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot <| hx.mono hstf.2
exact ⟨x, ⟨hsx, hxt⟩, hx⟩
/-- The intersection of a closed set and a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.inter_left (ht : IsLindelof t) (hs : IsClosed s) : IsLindelof (s ∩ t) :=
inter_comm t s ▸ ht.inter_right hs
/-- The set difference of a Lindelöf set and an open set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.diff (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsLindelof (s \ t) :=
hs.inter_right (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr ht)
/-- A closed subset of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.of_isClosed_subset (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsClosed t) (h : t ⊆ s) :
IsLindelof t := inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h ▸ hs.inter_right ht
/-- A continuous image of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.image_of_continuousOn {f : X → Y} (hs : IsLindelof s) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) :
IsLindelof (f '' s) := by
intro l lne _ ls
have : NeBot (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
comap_inf_principal_neBot_of_image_mem lne (le_principal_iff.1 ls)
obtain ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) := @hs _ this _ inf_le_right
haveI := hx.neBot
use f x, mem_image_of_mem f hxs
have : Tendsto f (𝓝 x ⊓ (comap f l ⊓ 𝓟 s)) (𝓝 (f x) ⊓ l) := by
convert (hf x hxs).inf (@tendsto_comap _ _ f l) using 1
rw [nhdsWithin]
ac_rfl
exact this.neBot
/-- A continuous image of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set within the codomain. -/
theorem IsLindelof.image {f : X → Y} (hs : IsLindelof s) (hf : Continuous f) :
IsLindelof (f '' s) := hs.image_of_continuousOn hf.continuousOn
/-- A filter with the countable intersection property that is finer than the principal filter on
a Lindelöf set `s` contains any open set that contains all clusterpoints of `s`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.adherence_nhdset {f : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter f] (hs : IsLindelof s)
(hf₂ : f ≤ 𝓟 s) (ht₁ : IsOpen t) (ht₂ : ∀ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f → x ∈ t) : t ∈ f :=
(eq_or_neBot _).casesOn mem_of_eq_bot fun _ ↦
let ⟨x, hx, hfx⟩ := @hs (f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ) _ _ <| inf_le_of_left_le hf₂
have : x ∈ t := ht₂ x hx hfx.of_inf_left
have : tᶜ ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x := inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (ht₁.mem_nhds this)
have A : 𝓝[tᶜ] x = ⊥ := empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| compl_inter_self t ▸ this
have : 𝓝[tᶜ] x ≠ ⊥ := hfx.of_inf_right.ne
absurd A this
/-- For every open cover of a Lindelöf set, there exists a countable subcover. -/
theorem IsLindelof.elim_countable_subcover {ι : Type v} (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : ι → Set X)
(hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) :
∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
have hmono : ∀ ⦃s t : Set X⦄, s ⊆ t → (∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ t ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i)
→ (∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro _ _ hst ⟨r, ⟨hrcountable, hsub⟩⟩
exact ⟨r, hrcountable, Subset.trans hst hsub⟩
have hcountable_union : ∀ (S : Set (Set X)), S.Countable
→ (∀ s ∈ S, ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i))
→ ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (⋃₀ S ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro S hS hsr
choose! r hr using hsr
refine ⟨⋃ s ∈ S, r s, hS.biUnion_iff.mpr (fun s hs ↦ (hr s hs).1), ?_⟩
refine sUnion_subset ?h.right.h
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop, iUnion_exists, biUnion_and']
exact fun i is x hx ↦ mem_biUnion is ((hr i is).2 hx)
have h_nhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (t ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro x hx
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_iUnion.1 (hsU hx)
refine ⟨U i, mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds ((hUo i).mem_nhds hi), {i}, by simp, ?_⟩
simp only [mem_singleton_iff, iUnion_iUnion_eq_left]
exact Subset.refl _
exact hs.induction_on hmono hcountable_union h_nhds
theorem IsLindelof.elim_nhds_subcover' (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x (hx : x ∈ s), U x ‹x ∈ s› ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Set s, t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U (x : s) x.2 := by
have := hs.elim_countable_subcover (fun x : s ↦ interior (U x x.2)) (fun _ ↦ isOpen_interior)
fun x hx ↦
mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 <| hU _ _⟩
rcases this with ⟨r, ⟨hr, hs⟩⟩
use r, hr
apply Subset.trans hs
apply iUnion₂_subset
intro i hi
apply Subset.trans interior_subset
exact subset_iUnion_of_subset i (subset_iUnion_of_subset hi (Subset.refl _))
theorem IsLindelof.elim_nhds_subcover (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : X → Set X)
(hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Set X, t.Countable ∧ (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x := by
let ⟨t, ⟨htc, htsub⟩⟩ := hs.elim_nhds_subcover' (fun x _ ↦ U x) hU
refine ⟨↑t, Countable.image htc Subtype.val, ?_⟩
constructor
· intro _
simp only [mem_image, Subtype.exists, exists_and_right, exists_eq_right, forall_exists_index]
tauto
· have : ⋃ x ∈ t, U ↑x = ⋃ x ∈ Subtype.val '' t, U x := biUnion_image.symm
rwa [← this]
/-- For every nonempty open cover of a Lindelöf set, there exists a subcover indexed by ℕ. -/
| theorem IsLindelof.indexed_countable_subcover {ι : Type v} [Nonempty ι]
(hs : IsLindelof s) (U : ι → Set X) (hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) :
∃ f : ℕ → ι, s ⊆ ⋃ n, U (f n) := by
obtain ⟨c, ⟨c_count, c_cov⟩⟩ := hs.elim_countable_subcover U hUo hsU
rcases c.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | c_nonempty
· simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, iUnion_of_empty, iUnion_empty] at c_cov
simp only [subset_eq_empty c_cov rfl, empty_subset, exists_const]
obtain ⟨f, f_surj⟩ := (Set.countable_iff_exists_surjective c_nonempty).mp c_count
refine ⟨fun x ↦ f x, c_cov.trans <| iUnion₂_subset_iff.mpr (?_ : ∀ i ∈ c, U i ⊆ ⋃ n, U (f n))⟩
intro x hx
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := f_surj ⟨x, hx⟩
exact subset_iUnion_of_subset n <| subset_of_eq (by rw [hn])
| Mathlib/Topology/Compactness/Lindelof.lean | 180 | 191 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.Composition.Comp
/-!
# Invariance of measures along a kernel
We say that a measure `μ` is invariant with respect to a kernel `κ` if its push-forward along the
kernel `μ.bind κ` is the same measure.
## Main definitions
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.Invariant`: invariance of a given measure with respect to a kernel.
## Useful lemmas
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.const_bind_eq_comp_const`, and
`ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.comp_const_apply_eq_bind` established the relationship between
the push-forward measure and the composition of kernels.
-/
open MeasureTheory
open scoped MeasureTheory ENNReal ProbabilityTheory
namespace ProbabilityTheory
variable {α β : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β}
namespace Kernel
/-! ### Push-forward of measures along a kernel -/
@[deprecated "Use comp_add in Composition/MeasureComp" (since := "2025-02-28")]
theorem bind_add (μ ν : Measure α) (κ : Kernel α β) : (μ + ν).bind κ = μ.bind κ + ν.bind κ := by
ext1 s hs
rw [Measure.bind_apply hs (Kernel.aemeasurable _), lintegral_add_measure, Measure.coe_add,
Pi.add_apply, Measure.bind_apply hs (Kernel.aemeasurable _),
Measure.bind_apply hs (Kernel.aemeasurable _)]
@[deprecated "Use comp_smul in Composition/MeasureComp" (since := "2025-02-28")]
theorem bind_smul (κ : Kernel α β) (μ : Measure α) (r : ℝ≥0∞) : (r • μ).bind κ = r • μ.bind κ := by
ext1 s hs
rw [Measure.bind_apply hs (Kernel.aemeasurable _), lintegral_smul_measure, Measure.coe_smul,
Pi.smul_apply, Measure.bind_apply hs (Kernel.aemeasurable _), smul_eq_mul]
theorem const_bind_eq_comp_const (κ : Kernel α β) (μ : Measure α) :
const α (μ.bind κ) = κ ∘ₖ const α μ := by
ext a s hs
simp_rw [comp_apply' _ _ _ hs, const_apply, Measure.bind_apply hs (Kernel.aemeasurable _)]
| theorem comp_const_apply_eq_bind (κ : Kernel α β) (μ : Measure α) (a : α) :
(κ ∘ₖ const α μ) a = μ.bind κ := by
rw [← const_apply (μ.bind κ) a, const_bind_eq_comp_const κ μ]
| Mathlib/Probability/Kernel/Invariance.lean | 57 | 60 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.AbsoluteValue.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.MinMax
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Setoid.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Ring
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr
/-!
# Cauchy sequences
A basic theory of Cauchy sequences, used in the construction of the reals and p-adic numbers. Where
applicable, lemmas that will be reused in other contexts have been stated in extra generality.
There are other "versions" of Cauchyness in the library, in particular Cauchy filters in topology.
This is a concrete implementation that is useful for simplicity and computability reasons.
## Important definitions
* `IsCauSeq`: a predicate that says `f : ℕ → β` is Cauchy.
* `CauSeq`: the type of Cauchy sequences valued in type `β` with respect to an absolute value
function `abv`.
## Tags
sequence, cauchy, abs val, absolute value
-/
assert_not_exists Finset Module Submonoid FloorRing Module
variable {α β : Type*}
open IsAbsoluteValue
section
variable [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] [Ring β]
(abv : β → α) [IsAbsoluteValue abv]
theorem rat_add_continuous_lemma {ε : α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) :
∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : β}, abv (a₁ - b₁) < δ → abv (a₂ - b₂) < δ →
abv (a₁ + a₂ - (b₁ + b₂)) < ε :=
⟨ε / 2, half_pos ε0, fun {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂} h₁ h₂ => by
simpa [add_halves, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, add_left_comm, add_assoc] using
lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) (add_lt_add h₁ h₂)⟩
theorem rat_mul_continuous_lemma {ε K₁ K₂ : α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) :
∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : β}, abv a₁ < K₁ → abv b₂ < K₂ → abv (a₁ - b₁) < δ →
abv (a₂ - b₂) < δ → abv (a₁ * a₂ - b₁ * b₂) < ε := by
have K0 : (0 : α) < max 1 (max K₁ K₂) := lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (le_max_left _ _)
have εK := div_pos (half_pos ε0) K0
refine ⟨_, εK, fun {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂} ha₁ hb₂ h₁ h₂ => ?_⟩
replace ha₁ := lt_of_lt_of_le ha₁ (le_trans (le_max_left _ K₂) (le_max_right 1 _))
replace hb₂ := lt_of_lt_of_le hb₂ (le_trans (le_max_right K₁ _) (le_max_right 1 _))
set M := max 1 (max K₁ K₂)
have : abv (a₁ - b₁) * abv b₂ + abv (a₂ - b₂) * abv a₁ < ε / 2 / M * M + ε / 2 / M * M := by
gcongr
rw [← abv_mul abv, mul_comm, div_mul_cancel₀ _ (ne_of_gt K0), ← abv_mul abv, add_halves] at this
simpa [sub_eq_add_neg, mul_add, add_mul, add_left_comm] using
lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) this
theorem rat_inv_continuous_lemma {β : Type*} [DivisionRing β] (abv : β → α) [IsAbsoluteValue abv]
{ε K : α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) (K0 : 0 < K) :
∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a b : β}, K ≤ abv a → K ≤ abv b → abv (a - b) < δ → abv (a⁻¹ - b⁻¹) < ε := by
refine ⟨K * ε * K, mul_pos (mul_pos K0 ε0) K0, fun {a b} ha hb h => ?_⟩
have a0 := K0.trans_le ha
have b0 := K0.trans_le hb
rw [inv_sub_inv' ((abv_pos abv).1 a0) ((abv_pos abv).1 b0), abv_mul abv, abv_mul abv, abv_inv abv,
abv_inv abv, abv_sub abv]
refine lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left (lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right ?_ b0.le) a0.le
rw [mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel_right₀ b0.ne', ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel₀ a0.ne', one_mul]
refine h.trans_le ?_
gcongr
end
/-- A sequence is Cauchy if the distance between its entries tends to zero. -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def IsCauSeq {α : Type*} [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
{β : Type*} [Ring β] (abv : β → α) (f : ℕ → β) :
Prop :=
∀ ε > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, abv (f j - f i) < ε
namespace IsCauSeq
variable [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] [Ring β]
{abv : β → α} [IsAbsoluteValue abv] {f g : ℕ → β}
-- see Note [nolint_ge]
--@[nolint ge_or_gt] -- Porting note: restore attribute
theorem cauchy₂ (hf : IsCauSeq abv f) {ε : α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) :
∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, ∀ k ≥ i, abv (f j - f k) < ε := by
refine (hf _ (half_pos ε0)).imp fun i hi j ij k ik => ?_
rw [← add_halves ε]
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_sub_le abv _ _ _) (add_lt_add (hi _ ij) ?_)
rw [abv_sub abv]; exact hi _ ik
theorem cauchy₃ (hf : IsCauSeq abv f) {ε : α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) :
∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, ∀ k ≥ j, abv (f k - f j) < ε :=
let ⟨i, H⟩ := hf.cauchy₂ ε0
⟨i, fun _ ij _ jk => H _ (le_trans ij jk) _ ij⟩
lemma bounded (hf : IsCauSeq abv f) : ∃ r, ∀ i, abv (f i) < r := by
obtain ⟨i, h⟩ := hf _ zero_lt_one
set R : ℕ → α := @Nat.rec (fun _ => α) (abv (f 0)) fun i c => max c (abv (f i.succ)) with hR
have : ∀ i, ∀ j ≤ i, abv (f j) ≤ R i := by
refine Nat.rec (by simp [hR]) ?_
rintro i hi j (rfl | hj)
· simp [R]
· exact (hi j hj).trans (le_max_left _ _)
refine ⟨R i + 1, fun j ↦ ?_⟩
obtain hji | hij := le_total j i
· exact (this i _ hji).trans_lt (lt_add_one _)
· simpa using (abv_add abv _ _).trans_lt <| add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt (this i _ le_rfl) (h _ hij)
lemma bounded' (hf : IsCauSeq abv f) (x : α) : ∃ r > x, ∀ i, abv (f i) < r :=
let ⟨r, h⟩ := hf.bounded
⟨max r (x + 1), (lt_add_one x).trans_le (le_max_right _ _),
fun i ↦ (h i).trans_le (le_max_left _ _)⟩
lemma const (x : β) : IsCauSeq abv fun _ ↦ x :=
fun ε ε0 ↦ ⟨0, fun j _ => by simpa [abv_zero] using ε0⟩
theorem add (hf : IsCauSeq abv f) (hg : IsCauSeq abv g) : IsCauSeq abv (f + g) := fun _ ε0 =>
let ⟨_, δ0, Hδ⟩ := rat_add_continuous_lemma abv ε0
let ⟨i, H⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and (hf.cauchy₃ δ0) (hg.cauchy₃ δ0)
⟨i, fun _ ij =>
let ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := H _ le_rfl
Hδ (H₁ _ ij) (H₂ _ ij)⟩
lemma mul (hf : IsCauSeq abv f) (hg : IsCauSeq abv g) : IsCauSeq abv (f * g) := fun _ ε0 =>
let ⟨_, _, hF⟩ := hf.bounded' 0
let ⟨_, _, hG⟩ := hg.bounded' 0
let ⟨_, δ0, Hδ⟩ := rat_mul_continuous_lemma abv ε0
let ⟨i, H⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and (hf.cauchy₃ δ0) (hg.cauchy₃ δ0)
⟨i, fun j ij =>
let ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := H _ le_rfl
Hδ (hF j) (hG i) (H₁ _ ij) (H₂ _ ij)⟩
@[simp] lemma _root_.isCauSeq_neg : IsCauSeq abv (-f) ↔ IsCauSeq abv f := by
simp only [IsCauSeq, Pi.neg_apply, ← neg_sub', abv_neg]
protected alias ⟨of_neg, neg⟩ := isCauSeq_neg
end IsCauSeq
/-- `CauSeq β abv` is the type of `β`-valued Cauchy sequences, with respect to the absolute value
function `abv`. -/
def CauSeq {α : Type*} [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
(β : Type*) [Ring β] (abv : β → α) : Type _ :=
{ f : ℕ → β // IsCauSeq abv f }
namespace CauSeq
variable [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
section Ring
variable [Ring β] {abv : β → α}
instance : CoeFun (CauSeq β abv) fun _ => ℕ → β :=
⟨Subtype.val⟩
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : CauSeq β abv} (h : ∀ i, f i = g i) : f = g := Subtype.eq (funext h)
theorem isCauSeq (f : CauSeq β abv) : IsCauSeq abv f :=
f.2
theorem cauchy (f : CauSeq β abv) : ∀ {ε}, 0 < ε → ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, abv (f j - f i) < ε := @f.2
/-- Given a Cauchy sequence `f`, create a Cauchy sequence from a sequence `g` with
the same values as `f`. -/
def ofEq (f : CauSeq β abv) (g : ℕ → β) (e : ∀ i, f i = g i) : CauSeq β abv :=
⟨g, fun ε => by rw [show g = f from (funext e).symm]; exact f.cauchy⟩
variable [IsAbsoluteValue abv]
-- see Note [nolint_ge]
-- @[nolint ge_or_gt] -- Porting note: restore attribute
theorem cauchy₂ (f : CauSeq β abv) {ε} :
0 < ε → ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, ∀ k ≥ i, abv (f j - f k) < ε :=
f.2.cauchy₂
theorem cauchy₃ (f : CauSeq β abv) {ε} : 0 < ε → ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, ∀ k ≥ j, abv (f k - f j) < ε :=
f.2.cauchy₃
theorem bounded (f : CauSeq β abv) : ∃ r, ∀ i, abv (f i) < r := f.2.bounded
theorem bounded' (f : CauSeq β abv) (x : α) : ∃ r > x, ∀ i, abv (f i) < r := f.2.bounded' x
instance : Add (CauSeq β abv) :=
⟨fun f g => ⟨f + g, f.2.add g.2⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add (f g : CauSeq β abv) : ⇑(f + g) = (f : ℕ → β) + g :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem add_apply (f g : CauSeq β abv) (i : ℕ) : (f + g) i = f i + g i :=
rfl
variable (abv) in
/-- The constant Cauchy sequence. -/
def const (x : β) : CauSeq β abv := ⟨fun _ ↦ x, IsCauSeq.const _⟩
/-- The constant Cauchy sequence -/
local notation "const" => const abv
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_const (x : β) : (const x : ℕ → β) = Function.const ℕ x :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem const_apply (x : β) (i : ℕ) : (const x : ℕ → β) i = x :=
rfl
theorem const_inj {x y : β} : (const x : CauSeq β abv) = const y ↔ x = y :=
⟨fun h => congr_arg (fun f : CauSeq β abv => (f : ℕ → β) 0) h, congr_arg _⟩
instance : Zero (CauSeq β abv) :=
⟨const 0⟩
instance : One (CauSeq β abv) :=
⟨const 1⟩
instance : Inhabited (CauSeq β abv) :=
⟨0⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : ⇑(0 : CauSeq β abv) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_one : ⇑(1 : CauSeq β abv) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem zero_apply (i) : (0 : CauSeq β abv) i = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem one_apply (i) : (1 : CauSeq β abv) i = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem const_zero : const 0 = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem const_one : const 1 = 1 :=
rfl
theorem const_add (x y : β) : const (x + y) = const x + const y :=
rfl
instance : Mul (CauSeq β abv) := ⟨fun f g ↦ ⟨f * g, f.2.mul g.2⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul (f g : CauSeq β abv) : ⇑(f * g) = (f : ℕ → β) * g :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem mul_apply (f g : CauSeq β abv) (i : ℕ) : (f * g) i = f i * g i :=
rfl
theorem const_mul (x y : β) : const (x * y) = const x * const y :=
rfl
instance : Neg (CauSeq β abv) := ⟨fun f ↦ ⟨-f, f.2.neg⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_neg (f : CauSeq β abv) : ⇑(-f) = -f :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem neg_apply (f : CauSeq β abv) (i) : (-f) i = -f i :=
rfl
theorem const_neg (x : β) : const (-x) = -const x :=
rfl
instance : Sub (CauSeq β abv) :=
⟨fun f g => ofEq (f + -g) (fun x => f x - g x) fun i => by simp [sub_eq_add_neg]⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub (f g : CauSeq β abv) : ⇑(f - g) = (f : ℕ → β) - g :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem sub_apply (f g : CauSeq β abv) (i : ℕ) : (f - g) i = f i - g i :=
rfl
theorem const_sub (x y : β) : const (x - y) = const x - const y :=
rfl
section SMul
variable {G : Type*} [SMul G β] [IsScalarTower G β β]
instance : SMul G (CauSeq β abv) :=
⟨fun a f => (ofEq (const (a • (1 : β)) * f) (a • (f : ℕ → β))) fun _ => smul_one_mul _ _⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul (a : G) (f : CauSeq β abv) : ⇑(a • f) = a • (f : ℕ → β) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem smul_apply (a : G) (f : CauSeq β abv) (i : ℕ) : (a • f) i = a • f i :=
rfl
theorem const_smul (a : G) (x : β) : const (a • x) = a • const x :=
rfl
instance : IsScalarTower G (CauSeq β abv) (CauSeq β abv) :=
⟨fun a f g => Subtype.ext <| smul_assoc a (f : ℕ → β) (g : ℕ → β)⟩
end SMul
instance addGroup : AddGroup (CauSeq β abv) :=
Function.Injective.addGroup Subtype.val Subtype.val_injective rfl coe_add coe_neg coe_sub
(fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _) fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _
instance instNatCast : NatCast (CauSeq β abv) := ⟨fun n => const n⟩
instance instIntCast : IntCast (CauSeq β abv) := ⟨fun n => const n⟩
instance addGroupWithOne : AddGroupWithOne (CauSeq β abv) :=
Function.Injective.addGroupWithOne Subtype.val Subtype.val_injective rfl rfl
coe_add coe_neg coe_sub
(by intros; rfl)
(by intros; rfl)
(by intros; rfl)
(by intros; rfl)
instance : Pow (CauSeq β abv) ℕ :=
⟨fun f n =>
(ofEq (npowRec n f) fun i => f i ^ n) <| by induction n <;> simp [*, npowRec, pow_succ]⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_pow (f : CauSeq β abv) (n : ℕ) : ⇑(f ^ n) = (f : ℕ → β) ^ n :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem pow_apply (f : CauSeq β abv) (n i : ℕ) : (f ^ n) i = f i ^ n :=
rfl
theorem const_pow (x : β) (n : ℕ) : const (x ^ n) = const x ^ n :=
rfl
instance ring : Ring (CauSeq β abv) :=
Function.Injective.ring Subtype.val Subtype.val_injective rfl rfl coe_add coe_mul coe_neg coe_sub
(fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _) (fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _) coe_pow (fun _ => rfl) fun _ => rfl
instance {β : Type*} [CommRing β] {abv : β → α} [IsAbsoluteValue abv] : CommRing (CauSeq β abv) :=
{ CauSeq.ring with
mul_comm := fun a b => ext fun n => by simp [mul_left_comm, mul_comm] }
/-- `LimZero f` holds when `f` approaches 0. -/
def LimZero {abv : β → α} (f : CauSeq β abv) : Prop :=
∀ ε > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, abv (f j) < ε
theorem add_limZero {f g : CauSeq β abv} (hf : LimZero f) (hg : LimZero g) : LimZero (f + g)
| ε, ε0 =>
(exists_forall_ge_and (hf _ <| half_pos ε0) (hg _ <| half_pos ε0)).imp fun _ H j ij => by
let ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := H _ ij
simpa [add_halves ε] using lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) (add_lt_add H₁ H₂)
theorem mul_limZero_right (f : CauSeq β abv) {g} (hg : LimZero g) : LimZero (f * g)
| ε, ε0 =>
let ⟨F, F0, hF⟩ := f.bounded' 0
(hg _ <| div_pos ε0 F0).imp fun _ H j ij => by
have := mul_lt_mul' (le_of_lt <| hF j) (H _ ij) (abv_nonneg abv _) F0
rwa [mul_comm F, div_mul_cancel₀ _ (ne_of_gt F0), ← abv_mul] at this
theorem mul_limZero_left {f} (g : CauSeq β abv) (hg : LimZero f) : LimZero (f * g)
| ε, ε0 =>
let ⟨G, G0, hG⟩ := g.bounded' 0
(hg _ <| div_pos ε0 G0).imp fun _ H j ij => by
have := mul_lt_mul'' (H _ ij) (hG j) (abv_nonneg abv _) (abv_nonneg abv _)
rwa [div_mul_cancel₀ _ (ne_of_gt G0), ← abv_mul] at this
theorem neg_limZero {f : CauSeq β abv} (hf : LimZero f) : LimZero (-f) := by
rw [← neg_one_mul f]
exact mul_limZero_right _ hf
theorem sub_limZero {f g : CauSeq β abv} (hf : LimZero f) (hg : LimZero g) : LimZero (f - g) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using add_limZero hf (neg_limZero hg)
theorem limZero_sub_rev {f g : CauSeq β abv} (hfg : LimZero (f - g)) : LimZero (g - f) := by
simpa using neg_limZero hfg
theorem zero_limZero : LimZero (0 : CauSeq β abv)
| ε, ε0 => ⟨0, fun j _ => by simpa [abv_zero abv] using ε0⟩
theorem const_limZero {x : β} : LimZero (const x) ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨fun H =>
(abv_eq_zero abv).1 <|
(eq_of_le_of_forall_lt_imp_le_of_dense (abv_nonneg abv _)) fun _ ε0 =>
let ⟨_, hi⟩ := H _ ε0
le_of_lt <| hi _ le_rfl,
fun e => e.symm ▸ zero_limZero⟩
instance equiv : Setoid (CauSeq β abv) :=
⟨fun f g => LimZero (f - g),
⟨fun f => by simp [zero_limZero],
fun f ε hε => by simpa using neg_limZero f ε hε,
fun fg gh => by simpa using add_limZero fg gh⟩⟩
theorem add_equiv_add {f1 f2 g1 g2 : CauSeq β abv} (hf : f1 ≈ f2) (hg : g1 ≈ g2) :
f1 + g1 ≈ f2 + g2 := by simpa only [← add_sub_add_comm] using add_limZero hf hg
theorem neg_equiv_neg {f g : CauSeq β abv} (hf : f ≈ g) : -f ≈ -g := by
simpa only [neg_sub'] using neg_limZero hf
theorem sub_equiv_sub {f1 f2 g1 g2 : CauSeq β abv} (hf : f1 ≈ f2) (hg : g1 ≈ g2) :
f1 - g1 ≈ f2 - g2 := by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using add_equiv_add hf (neg_equiv_neg hg)
theorem equiv_def₃ {f g : CauSeq β abv} (h : f ≈ g) {ε : α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) :
∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, ∀ k ≥ j, abv (f k - g j) < ε :=
(exists_forall_ge_and (h _ <| half_pos ε0) (f.cauchy₃ <| half_pos ε0)).imp fun _ H j ij k jk => by
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := H _ ij
have := lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv (f j - g j) _) (add_lt_add h₁ (h₂ _ jk))
rwa [sub_add_sub_cancel', add_halves] at this
theorem limZero_congr {f g : CauSeq β abv} (h : f ≈ g) : LimZero f ↔ LimZero g :=
⟨fun l => by simpa using add_limZero (Setoid.symm h) l, fun l => by simpa using add_limZero h l⟩
theorem abv_pos_of_not_limZero {f : CauSeq β abv} (hf : ¬LimZero f) :
∃ K > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, K ≤ abv (f j) := by
haveI := Classical.propDecidable
| by_contra nk
refine hf fun ε ε0 => ?_
simp? [not_forall] at nk says
simp only [gt_iff_lt, ge_iff_le, not_exists, not_and, not_forall, Classical.not_imp,
not_le] at nk
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := f.cauchy₃ (half_pos ε0)
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/CauSeq/Basic.lean | 437 | 442 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Basic
/-!
# Maps between real and extended non-negative real numbers
This file focuses on the functions `ENNReal.toReal : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ` and `ENNReal.ofReal : ℝ → ℝ≥0∞` which
were defined in `Data.ENNReal.Basic`. It collects all the basic results of the interactions between
these functions and the algebraic and lattice operations, although a few may appear in earlier
files.
This file provides a `positivity` extension for `ENNReal.ofReal`.
# Main theorems
- `trichotomy (p : ℝ≥0∞) : p = 0 ∨ p = ∞ ∨ 0 < p.toReal`: often used for `WithLp` and `lp`
- `dichotomy (p : ℝ≥0∞) [Fact (1 ≤ p)] : p = ∞ ∨ 1 ≤ p.toReal`: often used for `WithLp` and `lp`
- `toNNReal_iInf` through `toReal_sSup`: these declarations allow for easy conversions between
indexed or set infima and suprema in `ℝ`, `ℝ≥0` and `ℝ≥0∞`. This is especially useful because
`ℝ≥0∞` is a complete lattice.
-/
assert_not_exists Finset
open Set NNReal ENNReal
namespace ENNReal
section Real
variable {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0}
theorem toReal_add (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : (a + b).toReal = a.toReal + b.toReal := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
rfl
theorem toReal_add_le : (a + b).toReal ≤ a.toReal + b.toReal :=
if ha : a = ∞ then by simp only [ha, top_add, toReal_top, zero_add, toReal_nonneg]
else
if hb : b = ∞ then by simp only [hb, add_top, toReal_top, add_zero, toReal_nonneg]
else le_of_eq (toReal_add ha hb)
theorem ofReal_add {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
ENNReal.ofReal (p + q) = ENNReal.ofReal p + ENNReal.ofReal q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, ← coe_add, coe_inj,
Real.toNNReal_add hp hq]
theorem ofReal_add_le {p q : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal (p + q) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal p + ENNReal.ofReal q :=
coe_le_coe.2 Real.toNNReal_add_le
@[simp]
theorem toReal_le_toReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toReal ≤ b.toReal ↔ a ≤ b := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
norm_cast
@[gcongr]
theorem toReal_mono (hb : b ≠ ∞) (h : a ≤ b) : a.toReal ≤ b.toReal :=
(toReal_le_toReal (ne_top_of_le_ne_top hb h) hb).2 h
theorem toReal_mono' (h : a ≤ b) (ht : b = ∞ → a = ∞) : a.toReal ≤ b.toReal := by
rcases eq_or_ne a ∞ with rfl | ha
· exact toReal_nonneg
· exact toReal_mono (mt ht ha) h
@[simp]
theorem toReal_lt_toReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toReal < b.toReal ↔ a < b := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
norm_cast
@[gcongr]
theorem toReal_strict_mono (hb : b ≠ ∞) (h : a < b) : a.toReal < b.toReal :=
(toReal_lt_toReal h.ne_top hb).2 h
@[gcongr]
theorem toNNReal_mono (hb : b ≠ ∞) (h : a ≤ b) : a.toNNReal ≤ b.toNNReal :=
toReal_mono hb h
theorem le_toNNReal_of_coe_le (h : p ≤ a) (ha : a ≠ ∞) : p ≤ a.toNNReal :=
@toNNReal_coe p ▸ toNNReal_mono ha h
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_le_toNNReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toNNReal ≤ b.toNNReal ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h => by rwa [← coe_toNNReal ha, ← coe_toNNReal hb, coe_le_coe], toNNReal_mono hb⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem toNNReal_strict_mono (hb : b ≠ ∞) (h : a < b) : a.toNNReal < b.toNNReal := by
simpa [← ENNReal.coe_lt_coe, hb, h.ne_top]
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_lt_toNNReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toNNReal < b.toNNReal ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun h => by rwa [← coe_toNNReal ha, ← coe_toNNReal hb, coe_lt_coe], toNNReal_strict_mono hb⟩
theorem toNNReal_lt_of_lt_coe (h : a < p) : a.toNNReal < p :=
@toNNReal_coe p ▸ toNNReal_strict_mono coe_ne_top h
theorem toReal_max (hr : a ≠ ∞) (hp : b ≠ ∞) :
ENNReal.toReal (max a b) = max (ENNReal.toReal a) (ENNReal.toReal b) :=
(le_total a b).elim
(fun h => by simp only [h, ENNReal.toReal_mono hp h, max_eq_right]) fun h => by
simp only [h, ENNReal.toReal_mono hr h, max_eq_left]
theorem toReal_min {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (hr : a ≠ ∞) (hp : b ≠ ∞) :
ENNReal.toReal (min a b) = min (ENNReal.toReal a) (ENNReal.toReal b) :=
(le_total a b).elim (fun h => by simp only [h, ENNReal.toReal_mono hp h, min_eq_left])
fun h => by simp only [h, ENNReal.toReal_mono hr h, min_eq_right]
theorem toReal_sup {a b : ℝ≥0∞} : a ≠ ∞ → b ≠ ∞ → (a ⊔ b).toReal = a.toReal ⊔ b.toReal :=
toReal_max
theorem toReal_inf {a b : ℝ≥0∞} : a ≠ ∞ → b ≠ ∞ → (a ⊓ b).toReal = a.toReal ⊓ b.toReal :=
toReal_min
theorem toNNReal_pos_iff : 0 < a.toNNReal ↔ 0 < a ∧ a < ∞ := by
induction a <;> simp
theorem toNNReal_pos {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha₀ : a ≠ 0) (ha_top : a ≠ ∞) : 0 < a.toNNReal :=
toNNReal_pos_iff.mpr ⟨bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr ha₀, lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr ha_top⟩
theorem toReal_pos_iff : 0 < a.toReal ↔ 0 < a ∧ a < ∞ :=
NNReal.coe_pos.trans toNNReal_pos_iff
theorem toReal_pos {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha₀ : a ≠ 0) (ha_top : a ≠ ∞) : 0 < a.toReal :=
toReal_pos_iff.mpr ⟨bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr ha₀, lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr ha_top⟩
@[gcongr, bound]
theorem ofReal_le_ofReal {p q : ℝ} (h : p ≤ q) : ENNReal.ofReal p ≤ ENNReal.ofReal q := by
simp [ENNReal.ofReal, Real.toNNReal_le_toNNReal h]
theorem ofReal_le_of_le_toReal {a : ℝ} {b : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a ≤ ENNReal.toReal b) :
ENNReal.ofReal a ≤ b :=
(ofReal_le_ofReal h).trans ofReal_toReal_le
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_le_ofReal_iff {p q : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ q) :
ENNReal.ofReal p ≤ ENNReal.ofReal q ↔ p ≤ q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, coe_le_coe, Real.toNNReal_le_toNNReal_iff h]
lemma ofReal_le_ofReal_iff' {p q : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal p ≤ .ofReal q ↔ p ≤ q ∨ p ≤ 0 :=
coe_le_coe.trans Real.toNNReal_le_toNNReal_iff'
lemma ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff' {p q : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal p < .ofReal q ↔ p < q ∧ 0 < q :=
coe_lt_coe.trans Real.toNNReal_lt_toNNReal_iff'
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_eq_ofReal_iff {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
ENNReal.ofReal p = ENNReal.ofReal q ↔ p = q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, coe_inj, Real.toNNReal_eq_toNNReal_iff hp hq]
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff {p q : ℝ} (h : 0 < q) :
ENNReal.ofReal p < ENNReal.ofReal q ↔ p < q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, coe_lt_coe, Real.toNNReal_lt_toNNReal_iff h]
theorem ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff_of_nonneg {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) :
ENNReal.ofReal p < ENNReal.ofReal q ↔ p < q := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.ofReal, coe_lt_coe, Real.toNNReal_lt_toNNReal_iff_of_nonneg hp]
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_pos {p : ℝ} : 0 < ENNReal.ofReal p ↔ 0 < p := by simp [ENNReal.ofReal]
@[bound] private alias ⟨_, Bound.ofReal_pos_of_pos⟩ := ofReal_pos
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_eq_zero {p : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal p = 0 ↔ p ≤ 0 := by simp [ENNReal.ofReal]
theorem ofReal_ne_zero_iff {r : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal r ≠ 0 ↔ 0 < r := by
rw [← zero_lt_iff, ENNReal.ofReal_pos]
@[simp]
theorem zero_eq_ofReal {p : ℝ} : 0 = ENNReal.ofReal p ↔ p ≤ 0 :=
eq_comm.trans ofReal_eq_zero
alias ⟨_, ofReal_of_nonpos⟩ := ofReal_eq_zero
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_lt_natCast {p : ℝ} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : ENNReal.ofReal p < n ↔ p < n := by
exact mod_cast ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff (Nat.cast_pos.2 hn.bot_lt)
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_lt_one {p : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal p < 1 ↔ p < 1 := by
exact mod_cast ofReal_lt_natCast one_ne_zero
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_lt_ofNat {p : ℝ} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
ENNReal.ofReal p < ofNat(n) ↔ p < OfNat.ofNat n :=
ofReal_lt_natCast (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp]
lemma natCast_le_ofReal {n : ℕ} {p : ℝ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : n ≤ ENNReal.ofReal p ↔ n ≤ p := by
simp only [← not_lt, ofReal_lt_natCast hn]
@[simp]
lemma one_le_ofReal {p : ℝ} : 1 ≤ ENNReal.ofReal p ↔ 1 ≤ p := by
exact mod_cast natCast_le_ofReal one_ne_zero
@[simp]
lemma ofNat_le_ofReal {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] {p : ℝ} :
ofNat(n) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal p ↔ OfNat.ofNat n ≤ p :=
natCast_le_ofReal (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_le_natCast {r : ℝ} {n : ℕ} : ENNReal.ofReal r ≤ n ↔ r ≤ n :=
coe_le_coe.trans Real.toNNReal_le_natCast
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_le_one {r : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal r ≤ 1 ↔ r ≤ 1 :=
coe_le_coe.trans Real.toNNReal_le_one
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_le_ofNat {r : ℝ} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
ENNReal.ofReal r ≤ ofNat(n) ↔ r ≤ OfNat.ofNat n :=
ofReal_le_natCast
@[simp]
lemma natCast_lt_ofReal {n : ℕ} {r : ℝ} : n < ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ n < r :=
coe_lt_coe.trans Real.natCast_lt_toNNReal
@[simp]
lemma one_lt_ofReal {r : ℝ} : 1 < ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ 1 < r := coe_lt_coe.trans Real.one_lt_toNNReal
@[simp]
lemma ofNat_lt_ofReal {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] {r : ℝ} :
ofNat(n) < ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ OfNat.ofNat n < r :=
natCast_lt_ofReal
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_eq_natCast {r : ℝ} {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) : ENNReal.ofReal r = n ↔ r = n :=
ENNReal.coe_inj.trans <| Real.toNNReal_eq_natCast h
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_eq_one {r : ℝ} : ENNReal.ofReal r = 1 ↔ r = 1 :=
ENNReal.coe_inj.trans Real.toNNReal_eq_one
@[simp]
lemma ofReal_eq_ofNat {r : ℝ} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
ENNReal.ofReal r = ofNat(n) ↔ r = OfNat.ofNat n :=
ofReal_eq_natCast (NeZero.ne n)
theorem ofReal_le_iff_le_toReal {a : ℝ} {b : ℝ≥0∞} (hb : b ≠ ∞) :
ENNReal.ofReal a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ ENNReal.toReal b := by
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
simpa [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.toReal] using Real.toNNReal_le_iff_le_coe
theorem ofReal_lt_iff_lt_toReal {a : ℝ} {b : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : b ≠ ∞) :
ENNReal.ofReal a < b ↔ a < ENNReal.toReal b := by
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
simpa [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.toReal] using Real.toNNReal_lt_iff_lt_coe ha
theorem ofReal_lt_coe_iff {a : ℝ} {b : ℝ≥0} (ha : 0 ≤ a) : ENNReal.ofReal a < b ↔ a < b :=
(ofReal_lt_iff_lt_toReal ha coe_ne_top).trans <| by rw [coe_toReal]
theorem le_ofReal_iff_toReal_le {a : ℝ≥0∞} {b : ℝ} (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : 0 ≤ b) :
a ≤ ENNReal.ofReal b ↔ ENNReal.toReal a ≤ b := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
simpa [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.toReal] using Real.le_toNNReal_iff_coe_le hb
theorem toReal_le_of_le_ofReal {a : ℝ≥0∞} {b : ℝ} (hb : 0 ≤ b) (h : a ≤ ENNReal.ofReal b) :
ENNReal.toReal a ≤ b :=
have ha : a ≠ ∞ := ne_top_of_le_ne_top ofReal_ne_top h
(le_ofReal_iff_toReal_le ha hb).1 h
theorem lt_ofReal_iff_toReal_lt {a : ℝ≥0∞} {b : ℝ} (ha : a ≠ ∞) :
a < ENNReal.ofReal b ↔ ENNReal.toReal a < b := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
simpa [ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.toReal] using Real.lt_toNNReal_iff_coe_lt
theorem toReal_lt_of_lt_ofReal {b : ℝ} (h : a < ENNReal.ofReal b) : ENNReal.toReal a < b :=
(lt_ofReal_iff_toReal_lt h.ne_top).1 h
theorem ofReal_mul {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) :
ENNReal.ofReal (p * q) = ENNReal.ofReal p * ENNReal.ofReal q := by
simp only [ENNReal.ofReal, ← coe_mul, Real.toNNReal_mul hp]
theorem ofReal_mul' {p q : ℝ} (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
ENNReal.ofReal (p * q) = ENNReal.ofReal p * ENNReal.ofReal q := by
rw [mul_comm, ofReal_mul hq, mul_comm]
theorem ofReal_pow {p : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) (n : ℕ) :
ENNReal.ofReal (p ^ n) = ENNReal.ofReal p ^ n := by
rw [ofReal_eq_coe_nnreal hp, ← coe_pow, ← ofReal_coe_nnreal, NNReal.coe_pow, NNReal.coe_mk]
theorem ofReal_nsmul {x : ℝ} {n : ℕ} : ENNReal.ofReal (n • x) = n • ENNReal.ofReal x := by
simp only [nsmul_eq_mul, ← ofReal_natCast n, ← ofReal_mul n.cast_nonneg]
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_mul {a b : ℝ≥0∞} : (a * b).toNNReal = a.toNNReal * b.toNNReal :=
WithTop.untopD_zero_mul a b
theorem toNNReal_mul_top (a : ℝ≥0∞) : ENNReal.toNNReal (a * ∞) = 0 := by simp
theorem toNNReal_top_mul (a : ℝ≥0∞) : ENNReal.toNNReal (∞ * a) = 0 := by simp
/-- `ENNReal.toNNReal` as a `MonoidHom`. -/
def toNNRealHom : ℝ≥0∞ →*₀ ℝ≥0 where
toFun := ENNReal.toNNReal
map_one' := toNNReal_coe _
map_mul' _ _ := toNNReal_mul
map_zero' := toNNReal_zero
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_pow (a : ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℕ) : (a ^ n).toNNReal = a.toNNReal ^ n :=
toNNRealHom.map_pow a n
/-- `ENNReal.toReal` as a `MonoidHom`. -/
def toRealHom : ℝ≥0∞ →*₀ ℝ :=
(NNReal.toRealHom : ℝ≥0 →*₀ ℝ).comp toNNRealHom
@[simp]
theorem toReal_mul : (a * b).toReal = a.toReal * b.toReal :=
toRealHom.map_mul a b
theorem toReal_nsmul (a : ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℕ) : (n • a).toReal = n • a.toReal := by simp
@[simp]
theorem toReal_pow (a : ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℕ) : (a ^ n).toReal = a.toReal ^ n :=
toRealHom.map_pow a n
theorem toReal_ofReal_mul (c : ℝ) (a : ℝ≥0∞) (h : 0 ≤ c) :
ENNReal.toReal (ENNReal.ofReal c * a) = c * ENNReal.toReal a := by
rw [ENNReal.toReal_mul, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal h]
theorem toReal_mul_top (a : ℝ≥0∞) : ENNReal.toReal (a * ∞) = 0 := by
rw [toReal_mul, toReal_top, mul_zero]
theorem toReal_top_mul (a : ℝ≥0∞) : ENNReal.toReal (∞ * a) = 0 := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact toReal_mul_top _
theorem toReal_eq_toReal (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toReal = b.toReal ↔ a = b := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
simp only [coe_inj, NNReal.coe_inj, coe_toReal]
protected theorem trichotomy (p : ℝ≥0∞) : p = 0 ∨ p = ∞ ∨ 0 < p.toReal := by
simpa only [or_iff_not_imp_left] using toReal_pos
protected theorem trichotomy₂ {p q : ℝ≥0∞} (hpq : p ≤ q) :
p = 0 ∧ q = 0 ∨
p = 0 ∧ q = ∞ ∨
p = 0 ∧ 0 < q.toReal ∨
p = ∞ ∧ q = ∞ ∨
0 < p.toReal ∧ q = ∞ ∨ 0 < p.toReal ∧ 0 < q.toReal ∧ p.toReal ≤ q.toReal := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (bot_le : 0 ≤ p) with ((rfl : 0 = p) | (hp : 0 < p))
· simpa using q.trichotomy
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (le_top : q ≤ ∞) with (rfl | hq)
· simpa using p.trichotomy
repeat' right
have hq' : 0 < q := lt_of_lt_of_le hp hpq
have hp' : p < ∞ := lt_of_le_of_lt hpq hq
simp [ENNReal.toReal_mono hq.ne hpq, ENNReal.toReal_pos_iff, hp, hp', hq', hq]
protected theorem dichotomy (p : ℝ≥0∞) [Fact (1 ≤ p)] : p = ∞ ∨ 1 ≤ p.toReal :=
haveI : p = ⊤ ∨ 0 < p.toReal ∧ 1 ≤ p.toReal := by
simpa using ENNReal.trichotomy₂ (Fact.out : 1 ≤ p)
this.imp_right fun h => h.2
theorem toReal_pos_iff_ne_top (p : ℝ≥0∞) [Fact (1 ≤ p)] : 0 < p.toReal ↔ p ≠ ∞ :=
⟨fun h hp =>
have : (0 : ℝ) ≠ 0 := toReal_top ▸ (hp ▸ h.ne : 0 ≠ ∞.toReal)
this rfl,
fun h => zero_lt_one.trans_le (p.dichotomy.resolve_left h)⟩
end Real
section iInf
variable {ι : Sort*} {f g : ι → ℝ≥0∞}
variable {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0}
theorem toNNReal_iInf (hf : ∀ i, f i ≠ ∞) : (iInf f).toNNReal = ⨅ i, (f i).toNNReal := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· rw [iInf_of_empty, toNNReal_top, NNReal.iInf_empty]
· lift f to ι → ℝ≥0 using hf
simp_rw [← coe_iInf, toNNReal_coe]
theorem toNNReal_sInf (s : Set ℝ≥0∞) (hs : ∀ r ∈ s, r ≠ ∞) :
(sInf s).toNNReal = sInf (ENNReal.toNNReal '' s) := by
have hf : ∀ i, ((↑) : s → ℝ≥0∞) i ≠ ∞ := fun ⟨r, rs⟩ => hs r rs
simpa only [← sInf_range, ← image_eq_range, Subtype.range_coe_subtype] using (toNNReal_iInf hf)
theorem toNNReal_iSup (hf : ∀ i, f i ≠ ∞) : (iSup f).toNNReal = ⨆ i, (f i).toNNReal := by
lift f to ι → ℝ≥0 using hf
simp_rw [toNNReal_coe]
by_cases h : BddAbove (range f)
· rw [← coe_iSup h, toNNReal_coe]
· rw [NNReal.iSup_of_not_bddAbove h, iSup_coe_eq_top.2 h, toNNReal_top]
theorem toNNReal_sSup (s : Set ℝ≥0∞) (hs : ∀ r ∈ s, r ≠ ∞) :
(sSup s).toNNReal = sSup (ENNReal.toNNReal '' s) := by
have hf : ∀ i, ((↑) : s → ℝ≥0∞) i ≠ ∞ := fun ⟨r, rs⟩ => hs r rs
simpa only [← sSup_range, ← image_eq_range, Subtype.range_coe_subtype] using (toNNReal_iSup hf)
theorem toReal_iInf (hf : ∀ i, f i ≠ ∞) : (iInf f).toReal = ⨅ i, (f i).toReal := by
simp only [ENNReal.toReal, toNNReal_iInf hf, NNReal.coe_iInf]
theorem toReal_sInf (s : Set ℝ≥0∞) (hf : ∀ r ∈ s, r ≠ ∞) :
(sInf s).toReal = sInf (ENNReal.toReal '' s) := by
simp only [ENNReal.toReal, toNNReal_sInf s hf, NNReal.coe_sInf, Set.image_image]
theorem toReal_iSup (hf : ∀ i, f i ≠ ∞) : (iSup f).toReal = ⨆ i, (f i).toReal := by
simp only [ENNReal.toReal, toNNReal_iSup hf, NNReal.coe_iSup]
theorem toReal_sSup (s : Set ℝ≥0∞) (hf : ∀ r ∈ s, r ≠ ∞) :
(sSup s).toReal = sSup (ENNReal.toReal '' s) := by
simp only [ENNReal.toReal, toNNReal_sSup s hf, NNReal.coe_sSup, Set.image_image]
@[simp] lemma ofReal_iInf [Nonempty ι] (f : ι → ℝ) :
ENNReal.ofReal (⨅ i, f i) = ⨅ i, ENNReal.ofReal (f i) := by
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ | h := em (∃ i, f i ≤ 0)
· rw [(iInf_eq_bot _).2 fun _ _ ↦ ⟨i, by simpa [ofReal_of_nonpos hi]⟩]
simp [Real.iInf_nonpos' ⟨i, hi⟩]
replace h i : 0 ≤ f i := le_of_not_le fun hi ↦ h ⟨i, hi⟩
refine eq_of_forall_le_iff fun a ↦ ?_
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a ∞
· simp
rw [le_iInf_iff, le_ofReal_iff_toReal_le ha, le_ciInf_iff ⟨0, by simpa [mem_lowerBounds]⟩]
· exact forall_congr' fun i ↦ (le_ofReal_iff_toReal_le ha (h _)).symm
· exact Real.iInf_nonneg h
theorem iInf_add : iInf f + a = ⨅ i, f i + a :=
le_antisymm (le_iInf fun _ => add_le_add (iInf_le _ _) <| le_rfl)
(tsub_le_iff_right.1 <| le_iInf fun _ => tsub_le_iff_right.2 <| iInf_le _ _)
theorem iSup_sub : (⨆ i, f i) - a = ⨆ i, f i - a :=
le_antisymm (tsub_le_iff_right.2 <| iSup_le fun i => tsub_le_iff_right.1 <| le_iSup (f · - a) i)
(iSup_le fun _ => tsub_le_tsub (le_iSup _ _) (le_refl a))
theorem sub_iInf : (a - ⨅ i, f i) = ⨆ i, a - f i := by
refine eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => ?_
rw [tsub_le_iff_right, add_comm, iInf_add]
simp [tsub_le_iff_right, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm]
theorem sInf_add {s : Set ℝ≥0∞} : sInf s + a = ⨅ b ∈ s, b + a := by simp [sInf_eq_iInf, iInf_add]
theorem add_iInf {a : ℝ≥0∞} : a + iInf f = ⨅ b, a + f b := by
rw [add_comm, iInf_add]; simp [add_comm]
theorem iInf_add_iInf (h : ∀ i j, ∃ k, f k + g k ≤ f i + g j) : iInf f + iInf g = ⨅ a, f a + g a :=
suffices ⨅ a, f a + g a ≤ iInf f + iInf g from
le_antisymm (le_iInf fun _ => add_le_add (iInf_le _ _) (iInf_le _ _)) this
calc
⨅ a, f a + g a ≤ ⨅ (a) (a'), f a + g a' :=
le_iInf₂ fun a a' => let ⟨k, h⟩ := h a a'; iInf_le_of_le k h
_ = iInf f + iInf g := by simp_rw [iInf_add, add_iInf]
end iInf
theorem sup_eq_zero {a b : ℝ≥0∞} : a ⊔ b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
sup_eq_bot_iff
end ENNReal
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: `ENNReal.ofReal`. -/
@[positivity ENNReal.ofReal _]
def evalENNRealOfReal : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ≥0∞), ~q(ENNReal.ofReal $a) =>
let ra ← core q(inferInstance) q(inferInstance) a
assertInstancesCommute
match ra with
| .positive pa => pure (.positive q(Iff.mpr (@ENNReal.ofReal_pos $a) $pa))
| _ => pure .none
| _, _, _ => throwError "not ENNReal.ofReal"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
| Mathlib/Data/ENNReal/Real.lean | 510 | 511 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Control.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.List.Monad
import Mathlib.Logic.OpClass
import Mathlib.Logic.Unique
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Basic properties of lists
-/
assert_not_exists GroupWithZero
assert_not_exists Lattice
assert_not_exists Prod.swap_eq_iff_eq_swap
assert_not_exists Ring
assert_not_exists Set.range
open Function
open Nat hiding one_pos
namespace List
universe u v w
variable {ι : Type*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {l₁ l₂ : List α}
/-- There is only one list of an empty type -/
instance uniqueOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] : Unique (List α) :=
{ instInhabitedList with
uniq := fun l =>
match l with
| [] => rfl
| a :: _ => isEmptyElim a }
instance : Std.LawfulIdentity (α := List α) Append.append [] where
left_id := nil_append
right_id := append_nil
instance : Std.Associative (α := List α) Append.append where
assoc := append_assoc
@[simp] theorem cons_injective {a : α} : Injective (cons a) := fun _ _ => tail_eq_of_cons_eq
theorem singleton_injective : Injective fun a : α => [a] := fun _ _ h => (cons_eq_cons.1 h).1
theorem set_of_mem_cons (l : List α) (a : α) : { x | x ∈ a :: l } = insert a { x | x ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_cons
/-! ### mem -/
theorem _root_.Decidable.List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem [DecidableEq α]
{a b : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ b :: l) : a = b ∨ a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l := by
by_cases hab : a = b
· exact Or.inl hab
· exact ((List.mem_cons.1 h).elim Or.inl (fun h => Or.inr ⟨hab, h⟩))
lemma mem_pair {a b c : α} : a ∈ [b, c] ↔ a = b ∨ a = c := by
rw [mem_cons, mem_singleton]
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `List.mem_map`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- It seems the side condition `hf` is not applied by `simpNF`.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem mem_map_of_injective {f : α → β} (H : Injective f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
f a ∈ map f l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun m => let ⟨_, m', e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map m; H e ▸ m', mem_map_of_mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff {f : α → α}
(hf : Function.Involutive f) (x : α) (l : List α) : (∃ y : α, y ∈ l ∧ f y = x) ↔ f x ∈ l :=
⟨by rintro ⟨y, h, rfl⟩; rwa [hf y], fun h => ⟨f x, h, hf _⟩⟩
theorem mem_map_of_involutive {f : α → α} (hf : Involutive f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
a ∈ map f l ↔ f a ∈ l := by rw [mem_map, hf.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff]
/-! ### length -/
alias ⟨_, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩ := length_pos_iff
theorem length_pos_iff_ne_nil {l : List α} : 0 < length l ↔ l ≠ [] :=
⟨ne_nil_of_length_pos, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩
theorem exists_of_length_succ {n} : ∀ l : List α, l.length = n + 1 → ∃ h t, l = h :: t
| [], H => absurd H.symm <| succ_ne_zero n
| h :: t, _ => ⟨h, t, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma length_injective_iff : Injective (List.length : List α → ℕ) ↔ Subsingleton α := by
constructor
· intro h; refine ⟨fun x y => ?_⟩; (suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this); apply h; rfl
· intros hα l1 l2 hl
induction l1 generalizing l2 <;> cases l2
· rfl
· cases hl
· cases hl
· next ih _ _ =>
congr
· subsingleton
· apply ih; simpa using hl
@[simp default+1] -- Raise priority above `length_injective_iff`.
lemma length_injective [Subsingleton α] : Injective (length : List α → ℕ) :=
length_injective_iff.mpr inferInstance
theorem length_eq_two {l : List α} : l.length = 2 ↔ ∃ a b, l = [a, b] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b] := l; ⟨a, b, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
theorem length_eq_three {l : List α} : l.length = 3 ↔ ∃ a b c, l = [a, b, c] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b, c] := l; ⟨a, b, c, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
/-! ### set-theoretic notation of lists -/
instance instSingletonList : Singleton α (List α) := ⟨fun x => [x]⟩
instance [DecidableEq α] : Insert α (List α) := ⟨List.insert⟩
instance [DecidableEq α] : LawfulSingleton α (List α) :=
{ insert_empty_eq := fun x =>
show (if x ∈ ([] : List α) then [] else [x]) = [x] from if_neg not_mem_nil }
theorem singleton_eq (x : α) : ({x} : List α) = [x] :=
rfl
theorem insert_neg [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∉ l) :
Insert.insert x l = x :: l :=
insert_of_not_mem h
theorem insert_pos [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∈ l) : Insert.insert x l = l :=
insert_of_mem h
theorem doubleton_eq [DecidableEq α] {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : List α) = [x, y] := by
rw [insert_neg, singleton_eq]
rwa [singleton_eq, mem_singleton]
/-! ### bounded quantifiers over lists -/
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} (h : ∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
∀ x ∈ l, p x := (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2
theorem exists_mem_cons_of {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (l : List α) (h : p a) : ∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
⟨a, mem_cons_self, h⟩
theorem exists_mem_cons_of_exists {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ l, p x) →
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xl, px⟩ => ⟨x, mem_cons_of_mem _ xl, px⟩
theorem or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) →
p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xal, px⟩ =>
Or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xal) (fun h : x = a => by rw [← h]; left; exact px)
fun h : x ∈ l => Or.inr ⟨x, h, px⟩
theorem exists_mem_cons_iff (p : α → Prop) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
Iff.intro or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons fun h =>
Or.elim h (exists_mem_cons_of l) exists_mem_cons_of_exists
/-! ### list subset -/
theorem cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem {a : α} {l m : List α}
(ainm : a ∈ m) (lsubm : l ⊆ m) : a::l ⊆ m :=
cons_subset.2 ⟨ainm, lsubm⟩
theorem append_subset_of_subset_of_subset {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (l₁subl : l₁ ⊆ l) (l₂subl : l₂ ⊆ l) :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l :=
fun _ h ↦ (mem_append.1 h).elim (@l₁subl _) (@l₂subl _)
theorem map_subset_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} (f : α → β) (h : Injective f) :
map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ ↔ l₁ ⊆ l₂ := by
refine ⟨?_, map_subset f⟩; intro h2 x hx
rcases mem_map.1 (h2 (mem_map_of_mem hx)) with ⟨x', hx', hxx'⟩
cases h hxx'; exact hx'
/-! ### append -/
theorem append_eq_has_append {L₁ L₂ : List α} : List.append L₁ L₂ = L₁ ++ L₂ :=
rfl
theorem append_right_injective (s : List α) : Injective fun t ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_left
theorem append_left_injective (t : List α) : Injective fun s ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_right
/-! ### replicate -/
theorem eq_replicate_length {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, l = replicate l.length a ↔ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a
| [] => by simp
| (b :: l) => by simp [eq_replicate_length, replicate_succ]
theorem replicate_add (m n) (a : α) : replicate (m + n) a = replicate m a ++ replicate n a := by
rw [replicate_append_replicate]
theorem replicate_subset_singleton (n) (a : α) : replicate n a ⊆ [a] := fun _ h =>
mem_singleton.2 (eq_of_mem_replicate h)
theorem subset_singleton_iff {a : α} {L : List α} : L ⊆ [a] ↔ ∃ n, L = replicate n a := by
simp only [eq_replicate_iff, subset_def, mem_singleton, exists_eq_left']
theorem replicate_right_injective {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : Injective (@replicate α n) :=
fun _ _ h => (eq_replicate_iff.1 h).2 _ <| mem_replicate.2 ⟨hn, rfl⟩
theorem replicate_right_inj {a b : α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ a = b :=
(replicate_right_injective hn).eq_iff
theorem replicate_right_inj' {a b : α} : ∀ {n},
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ n = 0 ∨ a = b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => (replicate_right_inj n.succ_ne_zero).trans <| by simp only [n.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
theorem replicate_left_injective (a : α) : Injective (replicate · a) :=
LeftInverse.injective (length_replicate (n := ·))
theorem replicate_left_inj {a : α} {n m : ℕ} : replicate n a = replicate m a ↔ n = m :=
(replicate_left_injective a).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem head?_flatten_replicate {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) (l : List α) :
(List.replicate n l).flatten.head? = l.head? := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h
induction l <;> simp [replicate]
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_flatten_replicate {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) (l : List α) :
(List.replicate n l).flatten.getLast? = l.getLast? := by
rw [← List.head?_reverse, ← List.head?_reverse, List.reverse_flatten, List.map_replicate,
List.reverse_replicate, head?_flatten_replicate h]
/-! ### pure -/
theorem mem_pure (x y : α) : x ∈ (pure y : List α) ↔ x = y := by simp
/-! ### bind -/
@[simp]
theorem bind_eq_flatMap {α β} (f : α → List β) (l : List α) : l >>= f = l.flatMap f :=
rfl
/-! ### concat -/
/-! ### reverse -/
theorem reverse_cons' (a : α) (l : List α) : reverse (a :: l) = concat (reverse l) a := by
simp only [reverse_cons, concat_eq_append]
theorem reverse_concat' (l : List α) (a : α) : (l ++ [a]).reverse = a :: l.reverse := by
rw [reverse_append]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_singleton (a : α) : reverse [a] = [a] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_involutive : Involutive (@reverse α) :=
reverse_reverse
@[simp]
theorem reverse_injective : Injective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.injective
theorem reverse_surjective : Surjective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.surjective
theorem reverse_bijective : Bijective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.bijective
theorem concat_eq_reverse_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : concat l a = reverse (a :: reverse l) := by
simp only [concat_eq_append, reverse_cons, reverse_reverse]
theorem map_reverseAux (f : α → β) (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
map f (reverseAux l₁ l₂) = reverseAux (map f l₁) (map f l₂) := by
simp only [reverseAux_eq, map_append, map_reverse]
-- TODO: Rename `List.reverse_perm` to `List.reverse_perm_self`
@[simp] lemma reverse_perm' : l₁.reverse ~ l₂ ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ where
mp := l₁.reverse_perm.symm.trans
mpr := l₁.reverse_perm.trans
@[simp] lemma perm_reverse : l₁ ~ l₂.reverse ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ where
mp hl := hl.trans l₂.reverse_perm
mpr hl := hl.trans l₂.reverse_perm.symm
/-! ### getLast -/
attribute [simp] getLast_cons
theorem getLast_append_singleton {a : α} (l : List α) :
getLast (l ++ [a]) (append_ne_nil_of_right_ne_nil l (cons_ne_nil a _)) = a := by
simp [getLast_append]
theorem getLast_append_of_right_ne_nil (l₁ l₂ : List α) (h : l₂ ≠ []) :
getLast (l₁ ++ l₂) (append_ne_nil_of_right_ne_nil l₁ h) = getLast l₂ h := by
induction l₁ with
| nil => simp
| cons _ _ ih => simp only [cons_append]; rw [List.getLast_cons]; exact ih
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias getLast_append' := getLast_append_of_right_ne_nil
theorem getLast_concat' {a : α} (l : List α) : getLast (concat l a) (by simp) = a := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem getLast_singleton' (a : α) : getLast [a] (cons_ne_nil a []) = a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem getLast_cons_cons (a₁ a₂ : α) (l : List α) :
getLast (a₁ :: a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) = getLast (a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil a₂ l) :=
rfl
theorem dropLast_append_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), dropLast l ++ [getLast l h] = l
| [], h => absurd rfl h
| [_], _ => rfl
| a :: b :: l, h => by
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, getLast_cons (cons_ne_nil _ _)]
congr
exact dropLast_append_getLast (cons_ne_nil b l)
theorem getLast_congr {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ ≠ []) (h₂ : l₂ ≠ []) (h₃ : l₁ = l₂) :
getLast l₁ h₁ = getLast l₂ h₂ := by subst l₁; rfl
theorem getLast_replicate_succ (m : ℕ) (a : α) :
(replicate (m + 1) a).getLast (ne_nil_of_length_eq_add_one length_replicate) = a := by
simp only [replicate_succ']
exact getLast_append_singleton _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")]
alias getLast_filter' := getLast_filter_of_pos
/-! ### getLast? -/
theorem mem_getLast?_eq_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} {x : α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → ∃ h, x = getLast l h
| [], x, hx => False.elim <| by simp at hx
| [a], x, hx =>
have : a = x := by simpa using hx
this ▸ ⟨cons_ne_nil a [], rfl⟩
| a :: b :: l, x, hx => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hx
rcases mem_getLast?_eq_getLast hx with ⟨_, h₂⟩
use cons_ne_nil _ _
assumption
theorem getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), l.getLast? = some (l.getLast h)
| [], h => (h rfl).elim
| [_], _ => rfl
| _ :: b :: l, _ => @getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil (b :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)
theorem mem_getLast?_cons {x y : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → x ∈ (y :: l).getLast?
| [], _ => by contradiction
| _ :: _, h => h
theorem dropLast_append_getLast? : ∀ {l : List α}, ∀ a ∈ l.getLast?, dropLast l ++ [a] = l
| [], a, ha => (Option.not_mem_none a ha).elim
| [a], _, rfl => rfl
| a :: b :: l, c, hc => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hc
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, dropLast_append_getLast? _ hc]
theorem getLastI_eq_getLast? [Inhabited α] : ∀ l : List α, l.getLastI = l.getLast?.iget
| [] => by simp [getLastI, Inhabited.default]
| [_] => rfl
| [_, _] => rfl
| [_, _, _] => rfl
| _ :: _ :: c :: l => by simp [getLastI, getLastI_eq_getLast? (c :: l)]
theorem getLast?_append_cons :
∀ (l₁ : List α) (a : α) (l₂ : List α), getLast? (l₁ ++ a :: l₂) = getLast? (a :: l₂)
| [], _, _ => rfl
| [_], _, _ => rfl
| b :: c :: l₁, a, l₂ => by rw [cons_append, cons_append, getLast?_cons_cons,
← cons_append, getLast?_append_cons (c :: l₁)]
theorem getLast?_append_of_ne_nil (l₁ : List α) :
∀ {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₂ ≠ []), getLast? (l₁ ++ l₂) = getLast? l₂
| [], hl₂ => by contradiction
| b :: l₂, _ => getLast?_append_cons l₁ b l₂
theorem mem_getLast?_append_of_mem_getLast? {l₁ l₂ : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ l₂.getLast?) :
x ∈ (l₁ ++ l₂).getLast? := by
cases l₂
· contradiction
· rw [List.getLast?_append_cons]
exact h
/-! ### head(!?) and tail -/
@[simp]
theorem head!_nil [Inhabited α] : ([] : List α).head! = default := rfl
@[simp] theorem head_cons_tail (x : List α) (h : x ≠ []) : x.head h :: x.tail = x := by
cases x <;> simp at h ⊢
theorem head_eq_getElem_zero {l : List α} (hl : l ≠ []) :
l.head hl = l[0]'(length_pos_iff.2 hl) :=
(getElem_zero _).symm
theorem head!_eq_head? [Inhabited α] (l : List α) : head! l = (head? l).iget := by cases l <;> rfl
theorem surjective_head! [Inhabited α] : Surjective (@head! α _) := fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩
theorem surjective_head? : Surjective (@head? α) :=
Option.forall.2 ⟨⟨[], rfl⟩, fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩⟩
theorem surjective_tail : Surjective (@tail α)
| [] => ⟨[], rfl⟩
| a :: l => ⟨a :: a :: l, rfl⟩
theorem eq_cons_of_mem_head? {x : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.head? → l = x :: tail l
| [], h => (Option.not_mem_none _ h).elim
| a :: l, h => by
simp only [head?, Option.mem_def, Option.some_inj] at h
exact h ▸ rfl
@[simp] theorem head!_cons [Inhabited α] (a : α) (l : List α) : head! (a :: l) = a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem head!_append [Inhabited α] (t : List α) {s : List α} (h : s ≠ []) :
head! (s ++ t) = head! s := by
induction s
· contradiction
· rfl
theorem mem_head?_append_of_mem_head? {s t : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s.head?) :
x ∈ (s ++ t).head? := by
cases s
· contradiction
· exact h
theorem head?_append_of_ne_nil :
∀ (l₁ : List α) {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₁ ≠ []), head? (l₁ ++ l₂) = head? l₁
| _ :: _, _, _ => rfl
theorem tail_append_singleton_of_ne_nil {a : α} {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) :
tail (l ++ [a]) = tail l ++ [a] := by
induction l
· contradiction
· rw [tail, cons_append, tail]
theorem cons_head?_tail : ∀ {l : List α} {a : α}, a ∈ head? l → a :: tail l = l
| [], a, h => by contradiction
| b :: l, a, h => by
simp? at h says simp only [head?_cons, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq] at h
simp [h]
theorem head!_mem_head? [Inhabited α] : ∀ {l : List α}, l ≠ [] → head! l ∈ head? l
| [], h => by contradiction
| _ :: _, _ => rfl
theorem cons_head!_tail [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []) : head! l :: tail l = l :=
cons_head?_tail (head!_mem_head? h)
theorem head!_mem_self [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) : l.head! ∈ l := by
have h' : l.head! ∈ l.head! :: l.tail := mem_cons_self
rwa [cons_head!_tail h] at h'
theorem get_eq_getElem? (l : List α) (i : Fin l.length) :
l.get i = l[i]?.get (by simp [getElem?_eq_getElem]) := by
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias get_eq_get? := get_eq_getElem?
theorem exists_mem_iff_getElem {l : List α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ x ∈ l, p x) ↔ ∃ (i : ℕ) (_ : i < l.length), p l[i] := by
simp only [mem_iff_getElem]
exact ⟨fun ⟨_x, ⟨i, hi, hix⟩, hxp⟩ ↦ ⟨i, hi, hix ▸ hxp⟩, fun ⟨i, hi, hp⟩ ↦ ⟨_, ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩, hp⟩⟩
theorem forall_mem_iff_getElem {l : List α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ x ∈ l, p x) ↔ ∀ (i : ℕ) (_ : i < l.length), p l[i] := by
simp [mem_iff_getElem, @forall_swap α]
theorem get_tail (l : List α) (i) (h : i < l.tail.length)
(h' : i + 1 < l.length := (by simp only [length_tail] at h; omega)) :
l.tail.get ⟨i, h⟩ = l.get ⟨i + 1, h'⟩ := by
cases l <;> [cases h; rfl]
/-! ### sublists -/
attribute [refl] List.Sublist.refl
theorem Sublist.cons_cons {l₁ l₂ : List α} (a : α) (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : a :: l₁ <+ a :: l₂ :=
Sublist.cons₂ _ s
lemma cons_sublist_cons' {a b : α} : a :: l₁ <+ b :: l₂ ↔ a :: l₁ <+ l₂ ∨ a = b ∧ l₁ <+ l₂ := by
constructor
· rintro (_ | _)
· exact Or.inl ‹_›
· exact Or.inr ⟨rfl, ‹_›⟩
· rintro (h | ⟨rfl, h⟩)
· exact h.cons _
· rwa [cons_sublist_cons]
theorem sublist_cons_of_sublist (a : α) (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁ <+ a :: l₂ := h.cons _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")]
alias sublist_nil_iff_eq_nil := sublist_nil
@[simp] lemma sublist_singleton {l : List α} {a : α} : l <+ [a] ↔ l = [] ∨ l = [a] := by
constructor <;> rintro (_ | _) <;> aesop
theorem Sublist.antisymm (s₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (s₂ : l₂ <+ l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
s₁.eq_of_length_le s₂.length_le
/-- If the first element of two lists are different, then a sublist relation can be reduced. -/
theorem Sublist.of_cons_of_ne {a b} (h₁ : a ≠ b) (h₂ : a :: l₁ <+ b :: l₂) : a :: l₁ <+ l₂ :=
match h₁, h₂ with
| _, .cons _ h => h
/-! ### indexOf -/
section IndexOf
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem idxOf_cons_eq {a b : α} (l : List α) : b = a → idxOf a (b :: l) = 0
| e => by rw [← e]; exact idxOf_cons_self
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_cons_eq := idxOf_cons_eq
@[simp]
theorem idxOf_cons_ne {a b : α} (l : List α) : b ≠ a → idxOf a (b :: l) = succ (idxOf a l)
| h => by simp only [idxOf_cons, Bool.cond_eq_ite, beq_iff_eq, if_neg h]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_cons_ne := idxOf_cons_ne
theorem idxOf_eq_length_iff {a : α} {l : List α} : idxOf a l = length l ↔ a ∉ l := by
induction l with
| nil => exact iff_of_true rfl not_mem_nil
| cons b l ih =>
simp only [length, mem_cons, idxOf_cons, eq_comm]
rw [cond_eq_if]
split_ifs with h <;> simp at h
· exact iff_of_false (by rintro ⟨⟩) fun H => H <| Or.inl h.symm
· simp only [Ne.symm h, false_or]
rw [← ih]
exact succ_inj
@[simp]
theorem idxOf_of_not_mem {l : List α} {a : α} : a ∉ l → idxOf a l = length l :=
idxOf_eq_length_iff.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_of_not_mem := idxOf_of_not_mem
theorem idxOf_le_length {a : α} {l : List α} : idxOf a l ≤ length l := by
induction l with | nil => rfl | cons b l ih => ?_
simp only [length, idxOf_cons, cond_eq_if, beq_iff_eq]
by_cases h : b = a
· rw [if_pos h]; exact Nat.zero_le _
· rw [if_neg h]; exact succ_le_succ ih
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_le_length := idxOf_le_length
theorem idxOf_lt_length_iff {a} {l : List α} : idxOf a l < length l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun h => Decidable.byContradiction fun al => Nat.ne_of_lt h <| idxOf_eq_length_iff.2 al,
fun al => (lt_of_le_of_ne idxOf_le_length) fun h => idxOf_eq_length_iff.1 h al⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_lt_length_iff := idxOf_lt_length_iff
theorem idxOf_append_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ l₁) : idxOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = idxOf a l₁ := by
induction l₁ with
| nil =>
exfalso
exact not_mem_nil h
| cons d₁ t₁ ih =>
rw [List.cons_append]
by_cases hh : d₁ = a
· iterate 2 rw [idxOf_cons_eq _ hh]
rw [idxOf_cons_ne _ hh, idxOf_cons_ne _ hh, ih (mem_of_ne_of_mem (Ne.symm hh) h)]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_append_of_mem := idxOf_append_of_mem
theorem idxOf_append_of_not_mem {a : α} (h : a ∉ l₁) :
idxOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁.length + idxOf a l₂ := by
induction l₁ with
| nil => rw [List.nil_append, List.length, Nat.zero_add]
| cons d₁ t₁ ih =>
rw [List.cons_append, idxOf_cons_ne _ (ne_of_not_mem_cons h).symm, List.length,
ih (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons h), Nat.succ_add]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_append_of_not_mem := idxOf_append_of_not_mem
end IndexOf
/-! ### nth element -/
section deprecated
@[simp]
theorem getElem?_length (l : List α) : l[l.length]? = none := getElem?_eq_none le_rfl
/-- A version of `getElem_map` that can be used for rewriting. -/
theorem getElem_map_rev (f : α → β) {l} {n : Nat} {h : n < l.length} :
f l[n] = (map f l)[n]'((l.length_map f).symm ▸ h) := Eq.symm (getElem_map _)
theorem get_length_sub_one {l : List α} (h : l.length - 1 < l.length) :
l.get ⟨l.length - 1, h⟩ = l.getLast (by rintro rfl; exact Nat.lt_irrefl 0 h) :=
(getLast_eq_getElem _).symm
theorem take_one_drop_eq_of_lt_length {l : List α} {n : ℕ} (h : n < l.length) :
(l.drop n).take 1 = [l.get ⟨n, h⟩] := by
rw [drop_eq_getElem_cons h, take, take]
simp
theorem ext_getElem?' {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h' : ∀ n < max l₁.length l₂.length, l₁[n]? = l₂[n]?) :
l₁ = l₂ := by
apply ext_getElem?
intro n
rcases Nat.lt_or_ge n <| max l₁.length l₂.length with hn | hn
· exact h' n hn
· simp_all [Nat.max_le, getElem?_eq_none]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?' := ext_getElem?'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?_iff := List.ext_getElem?_iff
theorem ext_get_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
l₁ = l₂ ↔ l₁.length = l₂.length ∧ ∀ n h₁ h₂, get l₁ ⟨n, h₁⟩ = get l₂ ⟨n, h₂⟩ := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨rfl, fun _ _ _ ↦ rfl⟩
· intro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
exact ext_get h₁ h₂
theorem ext_getElem?_iff' {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ = l₂ ↔
∀ n < max l₁.length l₂.length, l₁[n]? = l₂[n]? :=
⟨by rintro rfl _ _; rfl, ext_getElem?'⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?_iff' := ext_getElem?_iff'
/-- If two lists `l₁` and `l₂` are the same length and `l₁[n]! = l₂[n]!` for all `n`,
then the lists are equal. -/
theorem ext_getElem! [Inhabited α] (hl : length l₁ = length l₂) (h : ∀ n : ℕ, l₁[n]! = l₂[n]!) :
l₁ = l₂ :=
ext_getElem hl fun n h₁ h₂ ↦ by simpa only [← getElem!_pos] using h n
@[simp]
theorem getElem_idxOf [DecidableEq α] {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α} (h : idxOf a l < l.length),
l[idxOf a l] = a
| b :: l, h => by
by_cases h' : b = a <;>
simp [h', if_pos, if_false, getElem_idxOf]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias getElem_indexOf := getElem_idxOf
-- This is incorrectly named and should be `get_idxOf`;
-- this already exists, so will require a deprecation dance.
theorem idxOf_get [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h) : get l ⟨idxOf a l, h⟩ = a := by
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_get := idxOf_get
@[simp]
theorem getElem?_idxOf [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
l[idxOf a l]? = some a := by
rw [getElem?_eq_getElem, getElem_idxOf (idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 h)]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias getElem?_indexOf := getElem?_idxOf
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias idxOf_get? := getElem?_idxOf
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_get? := getElem?_idxOf
theorem idxOf_inj [DecidableEq α] {l : List α} {x y : α} (hx : x ∈ l) (hy : y ∈ l) :
idxOf x l = idxOf y l ↔ x = y :=
⟨fun h => by
have x_eq_y :
get l ⟨idxOf x l, idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 hx⟩ =
get l ⟨idxOf y l, idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 hy⟩ := by
simp only [h]
simp only [idxOf_get] at x_eq_y; exact x_eq_y, fun h => by subst h; rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_inj := idxOf_inj
theorem get_reverse' (l : List α) (n) (hn') :
l.reverse.get n = l.get ⟨l.length - 1 - n, hn'⟩ := by
simp
theorem eq_cons_of_length_one {l : List α} (h : l.length = 1) : l = [l.get ⟨0, by omega⟩] := by
refine ext_get (by convert h) fun n h₁ h₂ => ?_
simp
congr
omega
end deprecated
@[simp]
theorem getElem_set_of_ne {l : List α} {i j : ℕ} (h : i ≠ j) (a : α)
(hj : j < (l.set i a).length) :
(l.set i a)[j] = l[j]'(by simpa using hj) := by
rw [← Option.some_inj, ← List.getElem?_eq_getElem, List.getElem?_set_ne h,
List.getElem?_eq_getElem]
/-! ### map -/
-- `List.map_const` (the version with `Function.const` instead of a lambda) is already tagged
-- `simp` in Core
-- TODO: Upstream the tagging to Core?
attribute [simp] map_const'
theorem flatMap_pure_eq_map (f : α → β) (l : List α) : l.flatMap (pure ∘ f) = map f l :=
.symm <| map_eq_flatMap ..
theorem flatMap_congr {l : List α} {f g : α → List β} (h : ∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) :
l.flatMap f = l.flatMap g :=
(congr_arg List.flatten <| map_congr_left h :)
theorem infix_flatMap_of_mem {a : α} {as : List α} (h : a ∈ as) (f : α → List α) :
f a <:+: as.flatMap f :=
infix_of_mem_flatten (mem_map_of_mem h)
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (l : List α) : f <$> l = map f l :=
rfl
/-- A single `List.map` of a composition of functions is equal to
composing a `List.map` with another `List.map`, fully applied.
This is the reverse direction of `List.map_map`.
-/
theorem comp_map (h : β → γ) (g : α → β) (l : List α) : map (h ∘ g) l = map h (map g l) :=
map_map.symm
/-- Composing a `List.map` with another `List.map` is equal to
a single `List.map` of composed functions.
-/
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) : map g ∘ map f = map (g ∘ f) := by
ext l; rw [comp_map, Function.comp_apply]
section map_bijectivity
theorem _root_.Function.LeftInverse.list_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse f g) :
LeftInverse (map f) (map g)
| [] => by simp_rw [map_nil]
| x :: xs => by simp_rw [map_cons, h x, h.list_map xs]
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.RightInverse.list_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(h : RightInverse f g) : RightInverse (map f) (map g) :=
h.list_map
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.list_map {f : α → α}
(h : Involutive f) : Involutive (map f) :=
Function.LeftInverse.list_map h
@[simp]
theorem map_leftInverse_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
LeftInverse (map f) (map g) ↔ LeftInverse f g :=
⟨fun h x => by injection h [x], (·.list_map)⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_rightInverse_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
RightInverse (map f) (map g) ↔ RightInverse f g := map_leftInverse_iff
@[simp]
theorem map_involutive_iff {f : α → α} :
Involutive (map f) ↔ Involutive f := map_leftInverse_iff
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Injective f) :
Injective (map f)
| [], [], _ => rfl
| x :: xs, y :: ys, hxy => by
injection hxy with hxy hxys
rw [h hxy, h.list_map hxys]
@[simp]
theorem map_injective_iff {f : α → β} : Injective (map f) ↔ Injective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x y hxy => ?_, (·.list_map)⟩
suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this
apply h
simp [hxy]
theorem _root_.Function.Surjective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Surjective f) :
Surjective (map f) :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := h.hasRightInverse; h.list_map.surjective
@[simp]
theorem map_surjective_iff {f : α → β} : Surjective (map f) ↔ Surjective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x => ?_, (·.list_map)⟩
let ⟨[y], hxy⟩ := h [x]
exact ⟨_, List.singleton_injective hxy⟩
theorem _root_.Function.Bijective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Bijective f) : Bijective (map f) :=
⟨h.1.list_map, h.2.list_map⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_bijective_iff {f : α → β} : Bijective (map f) ↔ Bijective f := by
simp_rw [Function.Bijective, map_injective_iff, map_surjective_iff]
end map_bijectivity
theorem eq_of_mem_map_const {b₁ b₂ : β} {l : List α} (h : b₁ ∈ map (const α b₂) l) :
b₁ = b₂ := by rw [map_const] at h; exact eq_of_mem_replicate h
/-- `eq_nil_or_concat` in simp normal form -/
lemma eq_nil_or_concat' (l : List α) : l = [] ∨ ∃ L b, l = L ++ [b] := by
simpa using l.eq_nil_or_concat
/-! ### foldl, foldr -/
theorem foldl_ext (f g : α → β → α) (a : α) {l : List β} (H : ∀ a : α, ∀ b ∈ l, f a b = g a b) :
foldl f a l = foldl g a l := by
induction l generalizing a with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl ih =>
unfold foldl
rw [ih _ fun a b bin => H a b <| mem_cons_of_mem _ bin, H a hd mem_cons_self]
theorem foldr_ext (f g : α → β → β) (b : β) {l : List α} (H : ∀ a ∈ l, ∀ b : β, f a b = g a b) :
foldr f b l = foldr g b l := by
induction l with | nil => rfl | cons hd tl ih => ?_
simp only [mem_cons, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq] at H
simp only [foldr, ih H.2, H.1]
theorem foldl_concat
(f : β → α → β) (b : β) (x : α) (xs : List α) :
List.foldl f b (xs ++ [x]) = f (List.foldl f b xs) x := by
simp only [List.foldl_append, List.foldl]
theorem foldr_concat
(f : α → β → β) (b : β) (x : α) (xs : List α) :
List.foldr f b (xs ++ [x]) = (List.foldr f (f x b) xs) := by
simp only [List.foldr_append, List.foldr]
theorem foldl_fixed' {f : α → β → α} {a : α} (hf : ∀ b, f a b = a) : ∀ l : List β, foldl f a l = a
| [] => rfl
| b :: l => by rw [foldl_cons, hf b, foldl_fixed' hf l]
theorem foldr_fixed' {f : α → β → β} {b : β} (hf : ∀ a, f a b = b) : ∀ l : List α, foldr f b l = b
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => by rw [foldr_cons, foldr_fixed' hf l, hf a]
@[simp]
theorem foldl_fixed {a : α} : ∀ l : List β, foldl (fun a _ => a) a l = a :=
foldl_fixed' fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem foldr_fixed {b : β} : ∀ l : List α, foldr (fun _ b => b) b l = b :=
foldr_fixed' fun _ => rfl
@[deprecated foldr_cons_nil (since := "2025-02-10")]
theorem foldr_eta (l : List α) : foldr cons [] l = l := foldr_cons_nil
theorem reverse_foldl {l : List α} : reverse (foldl (fun t h => h :: t) [] l) = l := by
simp
theorem foldl_hom₂ (l : List ι) (f : α → β → γ) (op₁ : α → ι → α) (op₂ : β → ι → β)
(op₃ : γ → ι → γ) (a : α) (b : β) (h : ∀ a b i, f (op₁ a i) (op₂ b i) = op₃ (f a b) i) :
foldl op₃ (f a b) l = f (foldl op₁ a l) (foldl op₂ b l) :=
Eq.symm <| by
revert a b
induction l <;> intros <;> [rfl; simp only [*, foldl]]
theorem foldr_hom₂ (l : List ι) (f : α → β → γ) (op₁ : ι → α → α) (op₂ : ι → β → β)
(op₃ : ι → γ → γ) (a : α) (b : β) (h : ∀ a b i, f (op₁ i a) (op₂ i b) = op₃ i (f a b)) :
foldr op₃ (f a b) l = f (foldr op₁ a l) (foldr op₂ b l) := by
revert a
induction l <;> intros <;> [rfl; simp only [*, foldr]]
theorem injective_foldl_comp {l : List (α → α)} {f : α → α}
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, Function.Injective f) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (@List.foldl (α → α) (α → α) Function.comp f l) := by
induction l generalizing f with
| nil => exact hf
| cons lh lt l_ih =>
apply l_ih fun _ h => hl _ (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ h)
apply Function.Injective.comp hf
apply hl _ mem_cons_self
/-- Consider two lists `l₁` and `l₂` with designated elements `a₁` and `a₂` somewhere in them:
`l₁ = x₁ ++ [a₁] ++ z₁` and `l₂ = x₂ ++ [a₂] ++ z₂`.
Assume the designated element `a₂` is present in neither `x₁` nor `z₁`.
We conclude that the lists are equal (`l₁ = l₂`) if and only if their respective parts are equal
(`x₁ = x₂ ∧ a₁ = a₂ ∧ z₁ = z₂`). -/
lemma append_cons_inj_of_not_mem {x₁ x₂ z₁ z₂ : List α} {a₁ a₂ : α}
(notin_x : a₂ ∉ x₁) (notin_z : a₂ ∉ z₁) :
x₁ ++ a₁ :: z₁ = x₂ ++ a₂ :: z₂ ↔ x₁ = x₂ ∧ a₁ = a₂ ∧ z₁ = z₂ := by
constructor
· simp only [append_eq_append_iff, cons_eq_append_iff, cons_eq_cons]
rintro (⟨c, rfl, ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨d, rfl, rfl⟩⟩ |
⟨c, rfl, ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨d, rfl, rfl⟩⟩) <;> simp_all
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩
rfl
section FoldlEqFoldr
-- foldl and foldr coincide when f is commutative and associative
variable {f : α → α → α}
theorem foldl1_eq_foldr1 [hassoc : Std.Associative f] :
∀ a b l, foldl f a (l ++ [b]) = foldr f b (a :: l)
| _, _, nil => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by
simp only [cons_append, foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl1_eq_foldr1 _ _ l]
rw [hassoc.assoc]
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc [hcomm : Std.Commutative f] [hassoc : Std.Associative f] :
∀ a b l, foldl f a (b :: l) = f b (foldl f a l)
| a, b, nil => hcomm.comm a b
| a, b, c :: l => by
simp only [foldl_cons]
have : RightCommutative f := inferInstance
rw [← foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc .., this.right_comm, foldl_cons]
theorem foldl_eq_foldr [Std.Commutative f] [Std.Associative f] :
∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr f a l
| _, nil => rfl
| a, b :: l => by
simp only [foldr_cons, foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc]
rw [foldl_eq_foldr a l]
end FoldlEqFoldr
section FoldlEqFoldlr'
variable {f : α → β → α}
variable (hf : ∀ a b c, f (f a b) c = f (f a c) b)
include hf
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm' : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (b :: l) = f (foldl f a l) b
| _, _, [] => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by rw [foldl, foldl, foldl, ← foldl_eq_of_comm' .., foldl, hf]
theorem foldl_eq_foldr' : ∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr (flip f) a l
| _, [] => rfl
| a, b :: l => by rw [foldl_eq_of_comm' hf, foldr, foldl_eq_foldr' ..]; rfl
end FoldlEqFoldlr'
section FoldlEqFoldlr'
variable {f : α → β → β}
theorem foldr_eq_of_comm' (hf : ∀ a b c, f a (f b c) = f b (f a c)) :
∀ a b l, foldr f a (b :: l) = foldr f (f b a) l
| _, _, [] => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by rw [foldr, foldr, foldr, hf, ← foldr_eq_of_comm' hf ..]; rfl
end FoldlEqFoldlr'
section
variable {op : α → α → α} [ha : Std.Associative op]
/-- Notation for `op a b`. -/
local notation a " ⋆ " b => op a b
/-- Notation for `foldl op a l`. -/
local notation l " <*> " a => foldl op a l
theorem foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc :
∀ {l : List α} {a₁ a₂}, ((l <*> a₁) ⋆ a₂) = a₁ ⋆ l.foldr (· ⋆ ·) a₂
| [], _, _ => rfl
| a :: l, a₁, a₂ => by
simp only [foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl_assoc, ha.assoc]; rw [foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc]
variable [hc : Std.Commutative op]
theorem foldl_assoc_comm_cons {l : List α} {a₁ a₂} : ((a₁ :: l) <*> a₂) = a₁ ⋆ l <*> a₂ := by
rw [foldl_cons, hc.comm, foldl_assoc]
end
/-! ### foldlM, foldrM, mapM -/
section FoldlMFoldrM
variable {m : Type v → Type w} [Monad m]
variable [LawfulMonad m]
theorem foldrM_eq_foldr (f : α → β → m β) (b l) :
foldrM f b l = foldr (fun a mb => mb >>= f a) (pure b) l := by induction l <;> simp [*]
theorem foldlM_eq_foldl (f : β → α → m β) (b l) :
List.foldlM f b l = foldl (fun mb a => mb >>= fun b => f b a) (pure b) l := by
suffices h :
∀ mb : m β, (mb >>= fun b => List.foldlM f b l) = foldl (fun mb a => mb >>= fun b => f b a) mb l
by simp [← h (pure b)]
induction l with
| nil => intro; simp
| cons _ _ l_ih => intro; simp only [List.foldlM, foldl, ← l_ih, functor_norm]
end FoldlMFoldrM
/-! ### intersperse -/
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias intersperse_singleton := intersperse_single
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias intersperse_cons_cons := intersperse_cons₂
/-! ### map for partial functions -/
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {l : List α} (hx : x ∈ l) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf l := by
induction l with | nil => ?_ | cons h t ih => ?_ <;> cases hx <;> rw [cons.sizeOf_spec]
· omega
· specialize ih ‹_›
omega
/-! ### filter -/
theorem length_eq_length_filter_add {l : List (α)} (f : α → Bool) :
l.length = (l.filter f).length + (l.filter (! f ·)).length := by
simp_rw [← List.countP_eq_length_filter, l.length_eq_countP_add_countP f, Bool.not_eq_true,
Bool.decide_eq_false]
/-! ### filterMap -/
theorem filterMap_eq_flatMap_toList (f : α → Option β) (l : List α) :
l.filterMap f = l.flatMap fun a ↦ (f a).toList := by
induction l with | nil => ?_ | cons a l ih => ?_ <;> simp [filterMap_cons]
rcases f a <;> simp [ih]
theorem filterMap_congr {f g : α → Option β} {l : List α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) : l.filterMap f = l.filterMap g := by
induction l <;> simp_all [filterMap_cons]
theorem filterMap_eq_map_iff_forall_eq_some {f : α → Option β} {g : α → β} {l : List α} :
l.filterMap f = l.map g ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, f x = some (g x) where
mp := by
induction l with | nil => simp | cons a l ih => ?_
rcases ha : f a with - | b <;> simp [ha, filterMap_cons]
· intro h
simpa [show (filterMap f l).length = l.length + 1 from by simp[h], Nat.add_one_le_iff]
using List.length_filterMap_le f l
· rintro rfl h
exact ⟨rfl, ih h⟩
mpr h := Eq.trans (filterMap_congr <| by simpa) (congr_fun filterMap_eq_map _)
/-! ### filter -/
section Filter
variable {p : α → Bool}
theorem filter_singleton {a : α} : [a].filter p = bif p a then [a] else [] :=
rfl
theorem filter_eq_foldr (p : α → Bool) (l : List α) :
filter p l = foldr (fun a out => bif p a then a :: out else out) [] l := by
induction l <;> simp [*, filter]; rfl
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-07-27
This has to be temporarily renamed to avoid an unintentional collision.
The prime should be removed at nightly-2024-07-27. -/
@[simp]
theorem filter_subset' (l : List α) : filter p l ⊆ l :=
filter_sublist.subset
theorem of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a ∈ filter p l) : p a := (mem_filter.1 h).2
theorem mem_of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a ∈ filter p l) : a ∈ l :=
filter_subset' l h
theorem mem_filter_of_mem {a : α} {l} (h₁ : a ∈ l) (h₂ : p a) : a ∈ filter p l :=
mem_filter.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias monotone_filter_left := filter_subset
variable (p)
theorem monotone_filter_right (l : List α) ⦃p q : α → Bool⦄
(h : ∀ a, p a → q a) : l.filter p <+ l.filter q := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl IH =>
by_cases hp : p hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos hp, filter_cons_of_pos (h _ hp)]
exact IH.cons_cons hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg hp]
by_cases hq : q hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos hq]
exact sublist_cons_of_sublist hd IH
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg hq]
exact IH
lemma map_filter {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (l : List α)
[DecidablePred fun b => ∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b] :
(l.filter p).map f = (l.map f).filter fun b => ∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b := by
simp [comp_def, filter_map, hf.eq_iff]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias map_filter' := map_filter
lemma filter_attach' (l : List α) (p : {a // a ∈ l} → Bool) [DecidableEq α] :
l.attach.filter p =
(l.filter fun x => ∃ h, p ⟨x, h⟩).attach.map (Subtype.map id fun _ => mem_of_mem_filter) := by
classical
refine map_injective_iff.2 Subtype.coe_injective ?_
simp [comp_def, map_filter _ Subtype.coe_injective]
lemma filter_attach (l : List α) (p : α → Bool) :
(l.attach.filter fun x => p x : List {x // x ∈ l}) =
(l.filter p).attach.map (Subtype.map id fun _ => mem_of_mem_filter) :=
map_injective_iff.2 Subtype.coe_injective <| by
simp_rw [map_map, comp_def, Subtype.map, id, ← Function.comp_apply (g := Subtype.val),
← filter_map, attach_map_subtype_val]
lemma filter_comm (q) (l : List α) : filter p (filter q l) = filter q (filter p l) := by
simp [Bool.and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem filter_true (l : List α) :
filter (fun _ => true) l = l := by induction l <;> simp [*, filter]
@[simp]
theorem filter_false (l : List α) :
filter (fun _ => false) l = [] := by induction l <;> simp [*, filter]
end Filter
/-! ### eraseP -/
section eraseP
variable {p : α → Bool}
@[simp]
theorem length_eraseP_add_one {l : List α} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a) :
(l.eraseP p).length + 1 = l.length := by
let ⟨_, l₁, l₂, _, _, h₁, h₂⟩ := exists_of_eraseP al pa
rw [h₂, h₁, length_append, length_append]
rfl
end eraseP
/-! ### erase -/
section Erase
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp] theorem length_erase_add_one {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
(l.erase a).length + 1 = l.length := by
rw [erase_eq_eraseP, length_eraseP_add_one h (decide_eq_true rfl)]
theorem map_erase [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Injective f) {a : α} (l : List α) :
map f (l.erase a) = (map f l).erase (f a) := by
have this : (a == ·) = (f a == f ·) := by ext b; simp [beq_eq_decide, finj.eq_iff]
rw [erase_eq_eraseP, erase_eq_eraseP, eraseP_map, this]; rfl
theorem map_foldl_erase [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Injective f) {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
map f (foldl List.erase l₁ l₂) = foldl (fun l a => l.erase (f a)) (map f l₁) l₂ := by
induction l₂ generalizing l₁ <;> [rfl; simp only [foldl_cons, map_erase finj, *]]
theorem erase_getElem [DecidableEq ι] {l : List ι} {i : ℕ} (hi : i < l.length) :
Perm (l.erase l[i]) (l.eraseIdx i) := by
induction l generalizing i with
| nil => simp
| cons a l IH =>
cases i with
| zero => simp
| succ i =>
have hi' : i < l.length := by simpa using hi
if ha : a = l[i] then
simpa [ha] using .trans (perm_cons_erase (getElem_mem _)) (.cons _ (IH hi'))
else
simpa [ha] using IH hi'
theorem length_eraseIdx_add_one {l : List ι} {i : ℕ} (h : i < l.length) :
(l.eraseIdx i).length + 1 = l.length := by
rw [length_eraseIdx]
split <;> omega
end Erase
/-! ### diff -/
section Diff
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
theorem map_diff [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Injective f) {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
map f (l₁.diff l₂) = (map f l₁).diff (map f l₂) := by
simp only [diff_eq_foldl, foldl_map, map_foldl_erase finj]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-10")]
alias erase_diff_erase_sublist_of_sublist := Sublist.erase_diff_erase_sublist
end Diff
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : List α)
theorem choose_spec (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(chooseX p l hp).property
theorem choose_mem (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).1
theorem choose_property (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).2
end Choose
/-! ### Forall -/
section Forall
variable {p q : α → Prop} {l : List α}
@[simp]
theorem forall_cons (p : α → Prop) (x : α) : ∀ l : List α, Forall p (x :: l) ↔ p x ∧ Forall p l
| [] => (and_iff_left_of_imp fun _ ↦ trivial).symm
| _ :: _ => Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem forall_append {p : α → Prop} : ∀ {xs ys : List α},
Forall p (xs ++ ys) ↔ Forall p xs ∧ Forall p ys
| [] => by simp
| _ :: _ => by simp [forall_append, and_assoc]
theorem forall_iff_forall_mem : ∀ {l : List α}, Forall p l ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, p x
| [] => (iff_true_intro <| forall_mem_nil _).symm
| x :: l => by rw [forall_mem_cons, forall_cons, forall_iff_forall_mem]
theorem Forall.imp (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∀ {l : List α}, Forall p l → Forall q l
| [] => id
| x :: l => by
simp only [forall_cons, and_imp]
rw [← and_imp]
exact And.imp (h x) (Forall.imp h)
@[simp]
theorem forall_map_iff {p : β → Prop} (f : α → β) : Forall p (l.map f) ↔ Forall (p ∘ f) l := by
induction l <;> simp [*]
instance (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] : DecidablePred (Forall p) := fun _ =>
decidable_of_iff' _ forall_iff_forall_mem
end Forall
/-! ### Miscellaneous lemmas -/
theorem get_attach (l : List α) (i) :
(l.attach.get i).1 = l.get ⟨i, length_attach (l := l) ▸ i.2⟩ := by simp
section Disjoint
/-- The images of disjoint lists under a partially defined map are disjoint -/
theorem disjoint_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : ∀ a : α, p a → β} {s t : List α}
(hs : ∀ a ∈ s, p a) (ht : ∀ a ∈ t, p a)
(hf : ∀ (a a' : α) (ha : p a) (ha' : p a'), f a ha = f a' ha' → a = a')
(h : Disjoint s t) :
Disjoint (s.pmap f hs) (t.pmap f ht) := by
simp only [Disjoint, mem_pmap]
rintro b ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ ⟨a', ha', ha''⟩
apply h ha
rwa [hf a a' (hs a ha) (ht a' ha') ha''.symm]
/-- The images of disjoint lists under an injective map are disjoint -/
theorem disjoint_map {f : α → β} {s t : List α} (hf : Function.Injective f)
(h : Disjoint s t) : Disjoint (s.map f) (t.map f) := by
rw [← pmap_eq_map (fun _ _ ↦ trivial), ← pmap_eq_map (fun _ _ ↦ trivial)]
exact disjoint_pmap _ _ (fun _ _ _ _ h' ↦ hf h') h
alias Disjoint.map := disjoint_map
theorem Disjoint.of_map {f : α → β} {s t : List α} (h : Disjoint (s.map f) (t.map f)) :
Disjoint s t := fun _a has hat ↦
h (mem_map_of_mem has) (mem_map_of_mem hat)
theorem Disjoint.map_iff {f : α → β} {s t : List α} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Disjoint (s.map f) (t.map f) ↔ Disjoint s t :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.of_map, fun h ↦ h.map hf⟩
theorem Perm.disjoint_left {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (p : List.Perm l₁ l₂) :
Disjoint l₁ l ↔ Disjoint l₂ l := by
simp_rw [List.disjoint_left, p.mem_iff]
theorem Perm.disjoint_right {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (p : List.Perm l₁ l₂) :
Disjoint l l₁ ↔ Disjoint l l₂ := by
simp_rw [List.disjoint_right, p.mem_iff]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_reverse_left {l₁ l₂ : List α} : Disjoint l₁.reverse l₂ ↔ Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
reverse_perm _ |>.disjoint_left
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_reverse_right {l₁ l₂ : List α} : Disjoint l₁ l₂.reverse ↔ Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
reverse_perm _ |>.disjoint_right
end Disjoint
section lookup
variable [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α]
lemma lookup_graph (f : α → β) {a : α} {as : List α} (h : a ∈ as) :
lookup a (as.map fun x => (x, f x)) = some (f a) := by
induction as with
| nil => exact (not_mem_nil h).elim
| cons a' as ih =>
by_cases ha : a = a'
· simp [ha, lookup_cons]
· simpa [lookup_cons, beq_false_of_ne ha] using ih (List.mem_of_ne_of_mem ha h)
end lookup
section range'
@[simp]
lemma range'_0 (a b : ℕ) :
range' a b 0 = replicate b a := by
induction b with
| zero => simp
| succ b ih => simp [range'_succ, ih, replicate_succ]
lemma left_le_of_mem_range' {a b s x : ℕ}
(hx : x ∈ List.range' a b s) : a ≤ x := by
obtain ⟨i, _, rfl⟩ := List.mem_range'.mp hx
exact le_add_right a (s * i)
end range'
end List
| Mathlib/Data/List/Basic.lean | 1,681 | 1,681 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Jean Lo, Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jean Lo, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Action.Pointwise.Set
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Pointwise.Set
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Basic
/-!
# Absorption of sets
Let `M` act on `α`, let `A` and `B` be sets in `α`.
We say that `A` *absorbs* `B` if for sufficiently large `a : M`, we have `B ⊆ a • A`.
Formally, "for sufficiently large `a : M`" means "for all but a bounded set of `a`".
Traditionally, this definition is formulated
for the action of a (semi)normed ring on a module over that ring.
We formulate it in a more general settings for two reasons:
- this way we don't have to depend on metric spaces, normed rings etc;
- some proofs look nicer with this definition than with something like
`∃ r : ℝ, ∀ a : R, r ≤ ‖a‖ → B ⊆ a • A`.
If `M` is a `GroupWithZero` (e.g., a division ring),
the sets absorbing a given set form a filter, see `Filter.absorbing`.
## Implementation notes
For now, all theorems assume that we deal with (a generalization of) a module over a division ring.
Some lemmas have multiplicative versions for `MulDistribMulAction`s.
They can be added later when someone needs them.
## Keywords
absorbs, absorbent
-/
assert_not_exists Real
open Set Bornology Filter
open scoped Pointwise
section Defs
variable (M : Type*) {α : Type*} [Bornology M] [SMul M α]
/-- A set `s` absorbs another set `t` if `t` is contained in all scalings of `s`
by all but a bounded set of elements. -/
def Absorbs (s t : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ᶠ a in cobounded M, t ⊆ a • s
/-- A set is *absorbent* if it absorbs every singleton. -/
def Absorbent (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ x, Absorbs M s {x}
end Defs
namespace Absorbs
section SMul
variable {M α : Type*} [Bornology M] [SMul M α] {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ : Set α} {S T : Set (Set α)}
protected lemma empty : Absorbs M s ∅ := by simp [Absorbs]
protected lemma eventually (h : Absorbs M s t) : ∀ᶠ a in cobounded M, t ⊆ a • s := h
@[simp] lemma of_boundedSpace [BoundedSpace M] : Absorbs M s t := by simp [Absorbs]
lemma mono_left (h : Absorbs M s₁ t) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : Absorbs M s₂ t :=
h.mono fun _a ha ↦ ha.trans <| smul_set_mono hs
lemma mono_right (h : Absorbs M s t₁) (ht : t₂ ⊆ t₁) : Absorbs M s t₂ :=
h.mono fun _ ↦ ht.trans
lemma mono (h : Absorbs M s₁ t₁) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₂ ⊆ t₁) : Absorbs M s₂ t₂ :=
(h.mono_left hs).mono_right ht
@[simp]
lemma _root_.absorbs_union : Absorbs M s (t₁ ∪ t₂) ↔ Absorbs M s t₁ ∧ Absorbs M s t₂ := by
simp [Absorbs]
protected lemma union (h₁ : Absorbs M s t₁) (h₂ : Absorbs M s t₂) : Absorbs M s (t₁ ∪ t₂) :=
absorbs_union.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
lemma _root_.Set.Finite.absorbs_sUnion {T : Set (Set α)} (hT : T.Finite) :
Absorbs M s (⋃₀ T) ↔ ∀ t ∈ T, Absorbs M s t := by
simp [Absorbs, hT]
protected lemma sUnion (hT : T.Finite) (hs : ∀ t ∈ T, Absorbs M s t) :
Absorbs M s (⋃₀ T) :=
hT.absorbs_sUnion.2 hs
@[simp]
lemma _root_.absorbs_iUnion {ι : Sort*} [Finite ι] {t : ι → Set α} :
Absorbs M s (⋃ i, t i) ↔ ∀ i, Absorbs M s (t i) :=
(finite_range t).absorbs_sUnion.trans forall_mem_range
protected alias ⟨_, iUnion⟩ := absorbs_iUnion
lemma _root_.Set.Finite.absorbs_biUnion {ι : Type*} {t : ι → Set α} {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) :
Absorbs M s (⋃ i ∈ I, t i) ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, Absorbs M s (t i) := by
simp [Absorbs, hI]
protected alias ⟨_, biUnion⟩ := Set.Finite.absorbs_biUnion
@[simp]
lemma _root_.absorbs_biUnion_finset {ι : Type*} {t : ι → Set α} {I : Finset ι} :
Absorbs M s (⋃ i ∈ I, t i) ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, Absorbs M s (t i) :=
I.finite_toSet.absorbs_biUnion
protected alias ⟨_, biUnion_finset⟩ := absorbs_biUnion_finset
end SMul
section AddZero
variable {M E : Type*} [Bornology M] {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : Set E}
protected lemma add [AddZeroClass E] [DistribSMul M E]
(h₁ : Absorbs M s₁ t₁) (h₂ : Absorbs M s₂ t₂) : Absorbs M (s₁ + s₂) (t₁ + t₂) :=
h₂.mp <| h₁.eventually.mono fun x hx₁ hx₂ ↦ by rw [smul_add]; exact add_subset_add hx₁ hx₂
protected lemma zero [Zero E] [SMulZeroClass M E] {s : Set E} (hs : 0 ∈ s) : Absorbs M s 0 :=
Eventually.of_forall fun _ ↦ zero_subset.2 <| zero_mem_smul_set hs
end AddZero
end Absorbs
section GroupWithZero
variable {G₀ α : Type*} [GroupWithZero G₀] [Bornology G₀] [MulAction G₀ α]
{s t u : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)}
@[simp]
protected lemma Absorbs.univ : Absorbs G₀ univ s :=
(eventually_ne_cobounded 0).mono fun a ha ↦ by rw [smul_set_univ₀ ha]; apply subset_univ
lemma absorbs_iff_eventually_cobounded_mapsTo :
Absorbs G₀ s t ↔ ∀ᶠ c in cobounded G₀, MapsTo (c⁻¹ • ·) t s :=
eventually_congr <| (eventually_ne_cobounded 0).mono fun c hc ↦ by
rw [← preimage_smul_inv₀ hc]; rfl
alias ⟨eventually_cobounded_mapsTo, _⟩ := absorbs_iff_eventually_cobounded_mapsTo
@[simp]
lemma absorbs_inter : Absorbs G₀ (s ∩ t) u ↔ Absorbs G₀ s u ∧ Absorbs G₀ t u := by
simp only [absorbs_iff_eventually_cobounded_mapsTo, mapsTo_inter, eventually_and]
protected lemma Absorbs.inter (hs : Absorbs G₀ s u) (ht : Absorbs G₀ t u) : Absorbs G₀ (s ∩ t) u :=
absorbs_inter.2 ⟨hs, ht⟩
variable (G₀ u) in
/-- The filter of sets that absorb `u`. -/
def Filter.absorbing : Filter α where
sets := {s | Absorbs G₀ s u}
univ_sets := .univ
sets_of_superset h := h.mono_left
inter_sets := .inter
@[simp]
lemma Filter.mem_absorbing : s ∈ absorbing G₀ u ↔ Absorbs G₀ s u := .rfl
lemma Set.Finite.absorbs_sInter (hS : S.Finite) :
Absorbs G₀ (⋂₀ S) t ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, Absorbs G₀ s t :=
sInter_mem (f := absorbing G₀ t) hS
protected alias ⟨_, Absorbs.sInter⟩ := Set.Finite.absorbs_sInter
@[simp]
lemma absorbs_iInter {ι : Sort*} [Finite ι] {s : ι → Set α} :
Absorbs G₀ (⋂ i, s i) t ↔ ∀ i, Absorbs G₀ (s i) t :=
iInter_mem (f := absorbing G₀ t)
protected alias ⟨_, Absorbs.iInter⟩ := absorbs_iInter
lemma Set.Finite.absorbs_biInter {ι : Type*} {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) {s : ι → Set α} :
Absorbs G₀ (⋂ i ∈ I, s i) t ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, Absorbs G₀ (s i) t :=
biInter_mem (f := absorbing G₀ t) hI
protected alias ⟨_, Absorbs.biInter⟩ := Set.Finite.absorbs_biInter
@[simp]
| lemma absorbs_zero_iff [NeBot (cobounded G₀)]
{E : Type*} [AddMonoid E] [DistribMulAction G₀ E] {s : Set E} :
Absorbs G₀ s 0 ↔ 0 ∈ s := by
| Mathlib/Topology/Bornology/Absorbs.lean | 187 | 189 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Aaron Anderson, Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Card
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.End
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.NoncommProd
/-!
# support of a permutation
## Main definitions
In the following, `f g : Equiv.Perm α`.
* `Equiv.Perm.Disjoint`: two permutations `f` and `g` are `Disjoint` if every element is fixed
either by `f`, or by `g`.
Equivalently, `f` and `g` are `Disjoint` iff their `support` are disjoint.
* `Equiv.Perm.IsSwap`: `f = swap x y` for `x ≠ y`.
* `Equiv.Perm.support`: the elements `x : α` that are not fixed by `f`.
Assume `α` is a Fintype:
* `Equiv.Perm.fixed_point_card_lt_of_ne_one f` says that `f` has
strictly less than `Fintype.card α - 1` fixed points, unless `f = 1`.
(Equivalently, `f.support` has at least 2 elements.)
-/
open Equiv Finset Function
namespace Equiv.Perm
variable {α : Type*}
section Disjoint
/-- Two permutations `f` and `g` are `Disjoint` if their supports are disjoint, i.e.,
every element is fixed either by `f`, or by `g`. -/
def Disjoint (f g : Perm α) :=
∀ x, f x = x ∨ g x = x
variable {f g h : Perm α}
@[symm]
theorem Disjoint.symm : Disjoint f g → Disjoint g f := by simp only [Disjoint, or_comm, imp_self]
theorem Disjoint.symmetric : Symmetric (@Disjoint α) := fun _ _ => Disjoint.symm
instance : IsSymm (Perm α) Disjoint :=
⟨Disjoint.symmetric⟩
theorem disjoint_comm : Disjoint f g ↔ Disjoint g f :=
⟨Disjoint.symm, Disjoint.symm⟩
theorem Disjoint.commute (h : Disjoint f g) : Commute f g :=
Equiv.ext fun x =>
(h x).elim
(fun hf =>
(h (g x)).elim (fun hg => by simp [mul_apply, hf, hg]) fun hg => by
simp [mul_apply, hf, g.injective hg])
fun hg =>
(h (f x)).elim (fun hf => by simp [mul_apply, f.injective hf, hg]) fun hf => by
simp [mul_apply, hf, hg]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_one_left (f : Perm α) : Disjoint 1 f := fun _ => Or.inl rfl
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_one_right (f : Perm α) : Disjoint f 1 := fun _ => Or.inr rfl
theorem disjoint_iff_eq_or_eq : Disjoint f g ↔ ∀ x : α, f x = x ∨ g x = x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_refl_iff : Disjoint f f ↔ f = 1 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.symm ▸ disjoint_one_left 1⟩
ext x
rcases h x with hx | hx <;> simp [hx]
theorem Disjoint.inv_left (h : Disjoint f g) : Disjoint f⁻¹ g := by
intro x
rw [inv_eq_iff_eq, eq_comm]
exact h x
theorem Disjoint.inv_right (h : Disjoint f g) : Disjoint f g⁻¹ :=
h.symm.inv_left.symm
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_inv_left_iff : Disjoint f⁻¹ g ↔ Disjoint f g := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, Disjoint.inv_left⟩
convert h.inv_left
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_inv_right_iff : Disjoint f g⁻¹ ↔ Disjoint f g := by
rw [disjoint_comm, disjoint_inv_left_iff, disjoint_comm]
theorem Disjoint.mul_left (H1 : Disjoint f h) (H2 : Disjoint g h) : Disjoint (f * g) h := fun x =>
by cases H1 x <;> cases H2 x <;> simp [*]
theorem Disjoint.mul_right (H1 : Disjoint f g) (H2 : Disjoint f h) : Disjoint f (g * h) := by
rw [disjoint_comm]
exact H1.symm.mul_left H2.symm
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11215): TODO: make it `@[simp]`
theorem disjoint_conj (h : Perm α) : Disjoint (h * f * h⁻¹) (h * g * h⁻¹) ↔ Disjoint f g :=
(h⁻¹).forall_congr fun {_} ↦ by simp only [mul_apply, eq_inv_iff_eq]
theorem Disjoint.conj (H : Disjoint f g) (h : Perm α) : Disjoint (h * f * h⁻¹) (h * g * h⁻¹) :=
(disjoint_conj h).2 H
theorem disjoint_prod_right (l : List (Perm α)) (h : ∀ g ∈ l, Disjoint f g) :
Disjoint f l.prod := by
induction' l with g l ih
· exact disjoint_one_right _
· rw [List.prod_cons]
exact (h _ List.mem_cons_self).mul_right (ih fun g hg => h g (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ hg))
theorem disjoint_noncommProd_right {ι : Type*} {k : ι → Perm α} {s : Finset ι}
(hs : Set.Pairwise s fun i j ↦ Commute (k i) (k j))
(hg : ∀ i ∈ s, g.Disjoint (k i)) :
Disjoint g (s.noncommProd k (hs)) :=
noncommProd_induction s k hs g.Disjoint (fun _ _ ↦ Disjoint.mul_right) (disjoint_one_right g) hg
open scoped List in
theorem disjoint_prod_perm {l₁ l₂ : List (Perm α)} (hl : l₁.Pairwise Disjoint) (hp : l₁ ~ l₂) :
l₁.prod = l₂.prod :=
hp.prod_eq' <| hl.imp Disjoint.commute
theorem nodup_of_pairwise_disjoint {l : List (Perm α)} (h1 : (1 : Perm α) ∉ l)
(h2 : l.Pairwise Disjoint) : l.Nodup := by
refine List.Pairwise.imp_of_mem ?_ h2
intro τ σ h_mem _ h_disjoint _
subst τ
suffices (σ : Perm α) = 1 by
rw [this] at h_mem
exact h1 h_mem
exact ext fun a => or_self_iff.mp (h_disjoint a)
theorem pow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self {x : α} (hfx : f x = x) : ∀ n : ℕ, (f ^ n) x = x
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ, mul_apply, hfx, pow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hfx n]
theorem zpow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self {x : α} (hfx : f x = x) : ∀ n : ℤ, (f ^ n) x = x
| (n : ℕ) => pow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hfx n
| Int.negSucc n => by rw [zpow_negSucc, inv_eq_iff_eq, pow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self hfx]
theorem pow_apply_eq_of_apply_apply_eq_self {x : α} (hffx : f (f x) = x) :
∀ n : ℕ, (f ^ n) x = x ∨ (f ^ n) x = f x
| 0 => Or.inl rfl
| n + 1 =>
(pow_apply_eq_of_apply_apply_eq_self hffx n).elim
(fun h => Or.inr (by rw [pow_succ', mul_apply, h]))
fun h => Or.inl (by rw [pow_succ', mul_apply, h, hffx])
theorem zpow_apply_eq_of_apply_apply_eq_self {x : α} (hffx : f (f x) = x) :
∀ i : ℤ, (f ^ i) x = x ∨ (f ^ i) x = f x
| (n : ℕ) => pow_apply_eq_of_apply_apply_eq_self hffx n
| Int.negSucc n => by
rw [zpow_negSucc, inv_eq_iff_eq, ← f.injective.eq_iff, ← mul_apply, ← pow_succ', eq_comm,
inv_eq_iff_eq, ← mul_apply, ← pow_succ, @eq_comm _ x, or_comm]
exact pow_apply_eq_of_apply_apply_eq_self hffx _
theorem Disjoint.mul_apply_eq_iff {σ τ : Perm α} (hστ : Disjoint σ τ) {a : α} :
(σ * τ) a = a ↔ σ a = a ∧ τ a = a := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => by rw [mul_apply, h.2, h.1]⟩
rcases hστ a with hσ | hτ
· exact ⟨hσ, σ.injective (h.trans hσ.symm)⟩
· exact ⟨(congr_arg σ hτ).symm.trans h, hτ⟩
theorem Disjoint.mul_eq_one_iff {σ τ : Perm α} (hστ : Disjoint σ τ) :
σ * τ = 1 ↔ σ = 1 ∧ τ = 1 := by
simp_rw [Perm.ext_iff, one_apply, hστ.mul_apply_eq_iff, forall_and]
theorem Disjoint.zpow_disjoint_zpow {σ τ : Perm α} (hστ : Disjoint σ τ) (m n : ℤ) :
Disjoint (σ ^ m) (τ ^ n) := fun x =>
Or.imp (fun h => zpow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self h m)
(fun h => zpow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self h n) (hστ x)
theorem Disjoint.pow_disjoint_pow {σ τ : Perm α} (hστ : Disjoint σ τ) (m n : ℕ) :
Disjoint (σ ^ m) (τ ^ n) :=
hστ.zpow_disjoint_zpow m n
end Disjoint
section IsSwap
variable [DecidableEq α]
/-- `f.IsSwap` indicates that the permutation `f` is a transposition of two elements. -/
def IsSwap (f : Perm α) : Prop :=
∃ x y, x ≠ y ∧ f = swap x y
@[simp]
theorem ofSubtype_swap_eq {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (x y : Subtype p) :
ofSubtype (Equiv.swap x y) = Equiv.swap ↑x ↑y :=
Equiv.ext fun z => by
by_cases hz : p z
· rw [swap_apply_def, ofSubtype_apply_of_mem _ hz]
split_ifs with hzx hzy
· simp_rw [hzx, Subtype.coe_eta, swap_apply_left]
· simp_rw [hzy, Subtype.coe_eta, swap_apply_right]
· rw [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne] <;>
simp [Subtype.ext_iff, *]
· rw [ofSubtype_apply_of_not_mem _ hz, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne]
· intro h
apply hz
rw [h]
exact Subtype.prop x
intro h
apply hz
rw [h]
exact Subtype.prop y
theorem IsSwap.of_subtype_isSwap {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {f : Perm (Subtype p)}
(h : f.IsSwap) : (ofSubtype f).IsSwap :=
let ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨y, hy⟩, hxy⟩ := h
⟨x, y, by
simp only [Ne, Subtype.ext_iff] at hxy
exact hxy.1, by
rw [hxy.2, ofSubtype_swap_eq]⟩
theorem ne_and_ne_of_swap_mul_apply_ne_self {f : Perm α} {x y : α} (hy : (swap x (f x) * f) y ≠ y) :
f y ≠ y ∧ y ≠ x := by
simp only [swap_apply_def, mul_apply, f.injective.eq_iff] at *
by_cases h : f y = x
· constructor <;> intro <;> simp_all only [if_true, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, Ne]
· split_ifs at hy with h <;> try { simp [*] at * }
end IsSwap
section support
section Set
variable (p q : Perm α)
theorem set_support_inv_eq : { x | p⁻¹ x ≠ x } = { x | p x ≠ x } := by
ext x
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Ne]
rw [inv_def, symm_apply_eq, eq_comm]
theorem set_support_apply_mem {p : Perm α} {a : α} :
p a ∈ { x | p x ≠ x } ↔ a ∈ { x | p x ≠ x } := by simp
theorem set_support_zpow_subset (n : ℤ) : { x | (p ^ n) x ≠ x } ⊆ { x | p x ≠ x } := by
intro x
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Ne]
intro hx H
simp [zpow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self H] at hx
theorem set_support_mul_subset : { x | (p * q) x ≠ x } ⊆ { x | p x ≠ x } ∪ { x | q x ≠ x } := by
intro x
simp only [Perm.coe_mul, Function.comp_apply, Ne, Set.mem_union, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
by_cases hq : q x = x <;> simp [hq]
end Set
@[simp]
theorem apply_pow_apply_eq_iff (f : Perm α) (n : ℕ) {x : α} :
f ((f ^ n) x) = (f ^ n) x ↔ f x = x := by
rw [← mul_apply, Commute.self_pow f, mul_apply, apply_eq_iff_eq]
@[simp]
theorem apply_zpow_apply_eq_iff (f : Perm α) (n : ℤ) {x : α} :
f ((f ^ n) x) = (f ^ n) x ↔ f x = x := by
rw [← mul_apply, Commute.self_zpow f, mul_apply, apply_eq_iff_eq]
variable [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] {f g : Perm α}
/-- The `Finset` of nonfixed points of a permutation. -/
def support (f : Perm α) : Finset α := {x | f x ≠ x}
@[simp]
theorem mem_support {x : α} : x ∈ f.support ↔ f x ≠ x := by
rw [support, mem_filter, and_iff_right (mem_univ x)]
theorem not_mem_support {x : α} : x ∉ f.support ↔ f x = x := by simp
theorem coe_support_eq_set_support (f : Perm α) : (f.support : Set α) = { x | f x ≠ x } := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty_iff {σ : Perm α} : σ.support = ∅ ↔ σ = 1 := by
simp_rw [Finset.ext_iff, mem_support, Finset.not_mem_empty, iff_false, not_not,
Equiv.Perm.ext_iff, one_apply]
@[simp]
theorem support_one : (1 : Perm α).support = ∅ := by rw [support_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem support_refl : support (Equiv.refl α) = ∅ :=
support_one
theorem support_congr (h : f.support ⊆ g.support) (h' : ∀ x ∈ g.support, f x = g x) : f = g := by
ext x
by_cases hx : x ∈ g.support
· exact h' x hx
· rw [not_mem_support.mp hx, ← not_mem_support]
exact fun H => hx (h H)
/-- If g and c commute, then g stabilizes the support of c -/
theorem mem_support_iff_of_commute {g c : Perm α} (hgc : Commute g c) (x : α) :
x ∈ c.support ↔ g x ∈ c.support := by
simp only [mem_support, not_iff_not, ← mul_apply]
rw [← hgc, mul_apply, Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq]
theorem support_mul_le (f g : Perm α) : (f * g).support ≤ f.support ⊔ g.support := fun x => by
simp only [sup_eq_union]
rw [mem_union, mem_support, mem_support, mem_support, mul_apply, ← not_and_or, not_imp_not]
rintro ⟨hf, hg⟩
rw [hg, hf]
theorem exists_mem_support_of_mem_support_prod {l : List (Perm α)} {x : α}
(hx : x ∈ l.prod.support) : ∃ f : Perm α, f ∈ l ∧ x ∈ f.support := by
contrapose! hx
simp_rw [mem_support, not_not] at hx ⊢
induction' l with f l ih
· rfl
· rw [List.prod_cons, mul_apply, ih, hx]
· simp only [List.find?, List.mem_cons, true_or]
intros f' hf'
refine hx f' ?_
simp only [List.find?, List.mem_cons]
exact Or.inr hf'
theorem support_pow_le (σ : Perm α) (n : ℕ) : (σ ^ n).support ≤ σ.support := fun _ h1 =>
mem_support.mpr fun h2 => mem_support.mp h1 (pow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self h2 n)
@[simp]
theorem support_inv (σ : Perm α) : support σ⁻¹ = σ.support := by
simp_rw [Finset.ext_iff, mem_support, not_iff_not, inv_eq_iff_eq.trans eq_comm, imp_true_iff]
theorem apply_mem_support {x : α} : f x ∈ f.support ↔ x ∈ f.support := by
rw [mem_support, mem_support, Ne, Ne, apply_eq_iff_eq]
/-- The support of a permutation is invariant -/
theorem isInvariant_of_support_le {c : Perm α} {s : Finset α} (hcs : c.support ≤ s) (x : α) :
x ∈ s ↔ c x ∈ s := by
by_cases hx' : x ∈ c.support
· simp only [hcs hx', true_iff, hcs (apply_mem_support.mpr hx')]
· rw [not_mem_support.mp hx']
/-- A permutation c is the extension of a restriction of g to s
iff its support is contained in s and its restriction is that of g -/
lemma ofSubtype_eq_iff {g c : Equiv.Perm α} {s : Finset α}
(hg : ∀ x, x ∈ s ↔ g x ∈ s) :
ofSubtype (g.subtypePerm hg) = c ↔
c.support ≤ s ∧
∀ (hc' : ∀ x, x ∈ s ↔ c x ∈ s), c.subtypePerm hc' = g.subtypePerm hg := by
simp only [Equiv.ext_iff, subtypePerm_apply, Subtype.mk.injEq, Subtype.forall]
constructor
· intro h
constructor
· intro a ha
by_contra ha'
rw [mem_support, ← h a, ofSubtype_apply_of_not_mem (p := (· ∈ s)) _ ha'] at ha
exact ha rfl
· intro _ a ha
rw [← h a, ofSubtype_apply_of_mem (p := (· ∈ s)) _ ha, subtypePerm_apply]
· rintro ⟨hc, h⟩ a
specialize h (isInvariant_of_support_le hc)
by_cases ha : a ∈ s
· rw [h a ha, ofSubtype_apply_of_mem (p := (· ∈ s)) _ ha, subtypePerm_apply]
· rw [ofSubtype_apply_of_not_mem (p := (· ∈ s)) _ ha, eq_comm, ← not_mem_support]
exact Finset.not_mem_mono hc ha
theorem support_ofSubtype {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (u : Perm (Subtype p)) :
(ofSubtype u).support = u.support.map (Function.Embedding.subtype p) := by
ext x
simp only [mem_support, ne_eq, Finset.mem_map, Function.Embedding.coe_subtype, Subtype.exists,
exists_and_right, exists_eq_right, not_iff_comm, not_exists, not_not]
by_cases hx : p x
· simp only [forall_prop_of_true hx, ofSubtype_apply_of_mem u hx, ← Subtype.coe_inj]
· simp only [forall_prop_of_false hx, true_iff, ofSubtype_apply_of_not_mem u hx]
theorem mem_support_of_mem_noncommProd_support {α β : Type*} [DecidableEq β] [Fintype β]
{s : Finset α} {f : α → Perm β}
{comm : (s : Set α).Pairwise (Commute on f)} {x : β} (hx : x ∈ (s.noncommProd f comm).support) :
∃ a ∈ s, x ∈ (f a).support := by
contrapose! hx
classical
revert hx comm s
apply Finset.induction
· simp
· intro a s ha ih comm hs
rw [Finset.noncommProd_insert_of_not_mem s a f comm ha]
apply mt (Finset.mem_of_subset (support_mul_le _ _))
rw [Finset.sup_eq_union, Finset.not_mem_union]
exact ⟨hs a (s.mem_insert_self a), ih (fun a ha ↦ hs a (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem ha))⟩
theorem pow_apply_mem_support {n : ℕ} {x : α} : (f ^ n) x ∈ f.support ↔ x ∈ f.support := by
simp only [mem_support, ne_eq, apply_pow_apply_eq_iff]
theorem zpow_apply_mem_support {n : ℤ} {x : α} : (f ^ n) x ∈ f.support ↔ x ∈ f.support := by
simp only [mem_support, ne_eq, apply_zpow_apply_eq_iff]
theorem pow_eq_on_of_mem_support (h : ∀ x ∈ f.support ∩ g.support, f x = g x) (k : ℕ) :
∀ x ∈ f.support ∩ g.support, (f ^ k) x = (g ^ k) x := by
induction' k with k hk
· simp
· intro x hx
rw [pow_succ, mul_apply, pow_succ, mul_apply, h _ hx, hk]
rwa [mem_inter, apply_mem_support, ← h _ hx, apply_mem_support, ← mem_inter]
theorem disjoint_iff_disjoint_support : Disjoint f g ↔ _root_.Disjoint f.support g.support := by
simp [disjoint_iff_eq_or_eq, disjoint_iff, disjoint_iff, Finset.ext_iff, not_and_or,
imp_iff_not_or]
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_support (h : Disjoint f g) : _root_.Disjoint f.support g.support :=
disjoint_iff_disjoint_support.1 h
theorem Disjoint.support_mul (h : Disjoint f g) : (f * g).support = f.support ∪ g.support := by
refine le_antisymm (support_mul_le _ _) fun a => ?_
rw [mem_union, mem_support, mem_support, mem_support, mul_apply, ← not_and_or, not_imp_not]
exact
(h a).elim (fun hf h => ⟨hf, f.apply_eq_iff_eq.mp (h.trans hf.symm)⟩) fun hg h =>
⟨(congr_arg f hg).symm.trans h, hg⟩
theorem support_prod_of_pairwise_disjoint (l : List (Perm α)) (h : l.Pairwise Disjoint) :
l.prod.support = (l.map support).foldr (· ⊔ ·) ⊥ := by
induction' l with hd tl hl
· simp
· rw [List.pairwise_cons] at h
have : Disjoint hd tl.prod := disjoint_prod_right _ h.left
simp [this.support_mul, hl h.right]
theorem support_noncommProd {ι : Type*} {k : ι → Perm α} {s : Finset ι}
(hs : Set.Pairwise s fun i j ↦ Disjoint (k i) (k j)) :
(s.noncommProd k (hs.imp (fun _ _ ↦ Perm.Disjoint.commute))).support =
s.biUnion fun i ↦ (k i).support := by
classical
induction s using Finset.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert i s hi hrec =>
have hs' : (s : Set ι).Pairwise fun i j ↦ Disjoint (k i) (k j) :=
hs.mono (by simp only [Finset.coe_insert, Set.subset_insert])
rw [Finset.noncommProd_insert_of_not_mem _ _ _ _ hi, Finset.biUnion_insert]
rw [Equiv.Perm.Disjoint.support_mul, hrec hs']
apply disjoint_noncommProd_right
intro j hj
apply hs _ _ (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hj hi).symm <;>
simp only [Finset.coe_insert, Set.mem_insert_iff, Finset.mem_coe, hj, or_true, true_or]
theorem support_prod_le (l : List (Perm α)) : l.prod.support ≤ (l.map support).foldr (· ⊔ ·) ⊥ := by
induction' l with hd tl hl
· simp
· rw [List.prod_cons, List.map_cons, List.foldr_cons]
refine (support_mul_le hd tl.prod).trans ?_
exact sup_le_sup le_rfl hl
theorem support_zpow_le (σ : Perm α) (n : ℤ) : (σ ^ n).support ≤ σ.support := fun _ h1 =>
mem_support.mpr fun h2 => mem_support.mp h1 (zpow_apply_eq_self_of_apply_eq_self h2 n)
@[simp]
theorem support_swap {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) : support (swap x y) = {x, y} := by
ext z
by_cases hx : z = x
any_goals simpa [hx] using h.symm
by_cases hy : z = y
· simpa [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne, hx, hy] using h
· simp [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne, hx, hy]
theorem support_swap_iff (x y : α) : support (swap x y) = {x, y} ↔ x ≠ y := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => support_swap h⟩
rintro rfl
simp [Finset.ext_iff] at h
theorem support_swap_mul_swap {x y z : α} (h : List.Nodup [x, y, z]) :
support (swap x y * swap y z) = {x, y, z} := by
simp only [List.not_mem_nil, and_true, List.mem_cons, not_false_iff, List.nodup_cons,
List.mem_singleton, and_self_iff, List.nodup_nil] at h
push_neg at h
apply le_antisymm
· convert support_mul_le (swap x y) (swap y z) using 1
rw [support_swap h.left.left, support_swap h.right.left]
simp [Finset.ext_iff]
· intro
simp only [mem_insert, mem_singleton]
rintro (rfl | rfl | rfl | _) <;>
simp [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne, h.left.left, h.left.left.symm, h.left.right.symm,
h.left.right.left.symm, h.right.left.symm]
theorem support_swap_mul_ge_support_diff (f : Perm α) (x y : α) :
f.support \ {x, y} ≤ (swap x y * f).support := by
intro
simp only [and_imp, Perm.coe_mul, Function.comp_apply, Ne, mem_support, mem_insert, mem_sdiff,
mem_singleton]
push_neg
rintro ha ⟨hx, hy⟩ H
rw [swap_apply_eq_iff, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne hx hy] at H
exact ha H
theorem support_swap_mul_eq (f : Perm α) (x : α) (h : f (f x) ≠ x) :
(swap x (f x) * f).support = f.support \ {x} := by
by_cases hx : f x = x
· simp [hx, sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, not_mem_support.mpr hx, erase_eq_of_not_mem]
ext z
by_cases hzx : z = x
· simp [hzx]
by_cases hzf : z = f x
| · simp [hzf, hx, h, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne]
by_cases hzfx : f z = x
· simp [Ne.symm hzx, hzx, Ne.symm hzf, hzfx]
· simp [Ne.symm hzx, hzx, Ne.symm hzf, hzfx, f.injective.ne hzx, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne]
theorem mem_support_swap_mul_imp_mem_support_ne {x y : α} (hy : y ∈ support (swap x (f x) * f)) :
y ∈ support f ∧ y ≠ x := by
simp only [mem_support, swap_apply_def, mul_apply, f.injective.eq_iff] at *
by_cases h : f y = x
· constructor <;> intro <;> simp_all only [if_true, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, Ne]
· split_ifs at hy with heq
· subst heq; exact ⟨h, hy⟩
· exact ⟨hy, heq⟩
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Support.lean | 505 | 517 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Abs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Ring
/-!
# Order properties of cast of integers
This file proves additional properties about the *canonical* homomorphism from
the integers into an additive group with a one (`Int.cast`),
particularly results involving algebraic homomorphisms or the order structure on `ℤ`
which were not available in the import dependencies of `Mathlib.Data.Int.Cast.Basic`.
## TODO
Move order lemmas about `Nat.cast`, `Rat.cast`, `NNRat.cast` here.
-/
open Function Nat
variable {R : Type*}
namespace Int
section OrderedAddCommGroupWithOne
variable [AddCommGroupWithOne R] [PartialOrder R] [AddLeftMono R]
variable [ZeroLEOneClass R]
lemma cast_mono : Monotone (Int.cast : ℤ → R) := by
intro m n h
rw [← sub_nonneg] at h
lift n - m to ℕ using h with k hk
rw [← sub_nonneg, ← cast_sub, ← hk, cast_natCast]
exact k.cast_nonneg'
@[gcongr] protected lemma GCongr.intCast_mono {m n : ℤ} (hmn : m ≤ n) : (m : R) ≤ n := cast_mono hmn
variable [NeZero (1 : R)] {m n : ℤ}
@[simp] lemma cast_nonneg : ∀ {n : ℤ}, (0 : R) ≤ n ↔ 0 ≤ n
| (n : ℕ) => by simp
| -[n+1] => by
have : -(n : R) < 1 := lt_of_le_of_lt (by simp) zero_lt_one
simpa [(negSucc_lt_zero n).not_le, ← sub_eq_add_neg, le_neg] using this.not_le
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_le : (m : R) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← sub_nonneg, ← cast_sub, cast_nonneg, sub_nonneg]
lemma cast_strictMono : StrictMono (fun x : ℤ => (x : R)) :=
strictMono_of_le_iff_le fun _ _ => cast_le.symm
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_lt : (m : R) < n ↔ m < n := cast_strictMono.lt_iff_lt
@[gcongr] protected alias ⟨_, GCongr.intCast_strictMono⟩ := Int.cast_lt
@[simp] lemma cast_nonpos : (n : R) ≤ 0 ↔ n ≤ 0 := by rw [← cast_zero, cast_le]
@[simp] lemma cast_pos : (0 : R) < n ↔ 0 < n := by rw [← cast_zero, cast_lt]
@[simp] lemma cast_lt_zero : (n : R) < 0 ↔ n < 0 := by rw [← cast_zero, cast_lt]
end OrderedAddCommGroupWithOne
section LinearOrderedRing
variable [Ring R] [LinearOrder R] [IsStrictOrderedRing R] {a b n : ℤ} {x : R}
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma cast_min : ↑(min a b) = (min a b : R) := Monotone.map_min cast_mono
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma cast_max : (↑(max a b) : R) = max (a : R) (b : R) := Monotone.map_max cast_mono
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma cast_abs : (↑|a| : R) = |(a : R)| := by simp [abs_eq_max_neg]
lemma cast_one_le_of_pos (h : 0 < a) : (1 : R) ≤ a := mod_cast Int.add_one_le_of_lt h
lemma cast_le_neg_one_of_neg (h : a < 0) : (a : R) ≤ -1 := by
rw [← Int.cast_one, ← Int.cast_neg, cast_le]
exact Int.le_sub_one_of_lt h
variable (R) in
lemma cast_le_neg_one_or_one_le_cast_of_ne_zero (hn : n ≠ 0) : (n : R) ≤ -1 ∨ 1 ≤ (n : R) :=
hn.lt_or_lt.imp cast_le_neg_one_of_neg cast_one_le_of_pos
|
lemma nneg_mul_add_sq_of_abs_le_one (n : ℤ) (hx : |x| ≤ 1) : (0 : R) ≤ n * x + n * n := by
have hnx : 0 < n → 0 ≤ x + n := fun hn => by
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Ring/Cast.lean | 89 | 91 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.CliffordAlgebra.Conjugation
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.CliffordAlgebra.Even
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.QuadraticForm.Prod
import Mathlib.Tactic.LiftLets
/-!
# Isomorphisms with the even subalgebra of a Clifford algebra
This file provides some notable isomorphisms regarding the even subalgebra, `CliffordAlgebra.even`.
## Main definitions
* `CliffordAlgebra.equivEven`: Every Clifford algebra is isomorphic as an algebra to the even
subalgebra of a Clifford algebra with one more dimension.
* `CliffordAlgebra.EquivEven.Q'`: The quadratic form used by this "one-up" algebra.
* `CliffordAlgebra.toEven`: The simp-normal form of the forward direction of this isomorphism.
* `CliffordAlgebra.ofEven`: The simp-normal form of the reverse direction of this isomorphism.
* `CliffordAlgebra.evenEquivEvenNeg`: Every even subalgebra is isomorphic to the even subalgebra
of the Clifford algebra with negated quadratic form.
* `CliffordAlgebra.evenToNeg`: The simp-normal form of each direction of this isomorphism.
## Main results
* `CliffordAlgebra.coe_toEven_reverse_involute`: the behavior of `CliffordAlgebra.toEven` on the
"Clifford conjugate", that is `CliffordAlgebra.reverse` composed with
`CliffordAlgebra.involute`.
-/
namespace CliffordAlgebra
variable {R M : Type*} [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable (Q : QuadraticForm R M)
/-! ### Constructions needed for `CliffordAlgebra.equivEven` -/
namespace EquivEven
/-- The quadratic form on the augmented vector space `M × R` sending `v + r•e0` to `Q v - r^2`. -/
abbrev Q' : QuadraticForm R (M × R) :=
Q.prod <| -QuadraticMap.sq (R := R)
theorem Q'_apply (m : M × R) : Q' Q m = Q m.1 - m.2 * m.2 :=
(sub_eq_add_neg _ _).symm
/-- The unit vector in the new dimension -/
def e0 : CliffordAlgebra (Q' Q) :=
ι (Q' Q) (0, 1)
/-- The embedding from the existing vector space -/
def v : M →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra (Q' Q) :=
ι (Q' Q) ∘ₗ LinearMap.inl _ _ _
theorem ι_eq_v_add_smul_e0 (m : M) (r : R) : ι (Q' Q) (m, r) = v Q m + r • e0 Q := by
rw [e0, v, LinearMap.comp_apply, LinearMap.inl_apply, ← LinearMap.map_smul, Prod.smul_mk,
smul_zero, smul_eq_mul, mul_one, ← LinearMap.map_add, Prod.mk_add_mk, zero_add, add_zero]
theorem e0_mul_e0 : e0 Q * e0 Q = -1 :=
(ι_sq_scalar _ _).trans <| by simp
theorem v_sq_scalar (m : M) : v Q m * v Q m = algebraMap _ _ (Q m) :=
(ι_sq_scalar _ _).trans <| by simp
theorem neg_e0_mul_v (m : M) : -(e0 Q * v Q m) = v Q m * e0 Q := by
refine neg_eq_of_add_eq_zero_right ((ι_mul_ι_add_swap _ _).trans ?_)
dsimp [QuadraticMap.polar]
simp only [add_zero, mul_zero, mul_one, zero_add, neg_zero, QuadraticMap.map_zero,
add_sub_cancel_right, sub_self, map_zero, zero_sub]
theorem neg_v_mul_e0 (m : M) : -(v Q m * e0 Q) = e0 Q * v Q m := by
rw [neg_eq_iff_eq_neg]
exact (neg_e0_mul_v _ m).symm
@[simp]
theorem e0_mul_v_mul_e0 (m : M) : e0 Q * v Q m * e0 Q = v Q m := by
rw [← neg_v_mul_e0, ← neg_mul, mul_assoc, e0_mul_e0, mul_neg_one, neg_neg]
@[simp]
theorem reverse_v (m : M) : reverse (Q := Q' Q) (v Q m) = v Q m :=
reverse_ι _
@[simp]
theorem involute_v (m : M) : involute (v Q m) = -v Q m :=
involute_ι _
@[simp]
theorem reverse_e0 : reverse (Q := Q' Q) (e0 Q) = e0 Q :=
| reverse_ι _
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/CliffordAlgebra/EvenEquiv.lean | 95 | 96 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Dynamics.Ergodic.MeasurePreserving
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Determinant
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Diagonal
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Transvection
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.LIntegral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Marginal
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Stieltjes
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.OfBasis
/-!
# Lebesgue measure on the real line and on `ℝⁿ`
We show that the Lebesgue measure on the real line (constructed as a particular case of additive
Haar measure on inner product spaces) coincides with the Stieltjes measure associated
to the function `x ↦ x`. We deduce properties of this measure on `ℝ`, and then of the product
Lebesgue measure on `ℝⁿ`. In particular, we prove that they are translation invariant.
We show that, on `ℝⁿ`, a linear map acts on Lebesgue measure by rescaling it through the absolute
value of its determinant, in `Real.map_linearMap_volume_pi_eq_smul_volume_pi`.
More properties of the Lebesgue measure are deduced from this in
`Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Lebesgue/EqHaar.lean`, where they are proved more generally for any
additive Haar measure on a finite-dimensional real vector space.
-/
assert_not_exists MeasureTheory.integral
noncomputable section
open Set Filter MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure TopologicalSpace
open ENNReal (ofReal)
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Topology
/-!
### Definition of the Lebesgue measure and lengths of intervals
-/
namespace Real
variable {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι]
/-- The volume on the real line (as a particular case of the volume on a finite-dimensional
inner product space) coincides with the Stieltjes measure coming from the identity function. -/
theorem volume_eq_stieltjes_id : (volume : Measure ℝ) = StieltjesFunction.id.measure := by
haveI : IsAddLeftInvariant StieltjesFunction.id.measure :=
⟨fun a =>
Eq.symm <|
Real.measure_ext_Ioo_rat fun p q => by
simp only [Measure.map_apply (measurable_const_add a) measurableSet_Ioo,
sub_sub_sub_cancel_right, StieltjesFunction.measure_Ioo, StieltjesFunction.id_leftLim,
StieltjesFunction.id_apply, id, preimage_const_add_Ioo]⟩
have A : StieltjesFunction.id.measure (stdOrthonormalBasis ℝ ℝ).toBasis.parallelepiped = 1 := by
change StieltjesFunction.id.measure (parallelepiped (stdOrthonormalBasis ℝ ℝ)) = 1
rcases parallelepiped_orthonormalBasis_one_dim (stdOrthonormalBasis ℝ ℝ) with (H | H) <;>
simp only [H, StieltjesFunction.measure_Icc, StieltjesFunction.id_apply, id, tsub_zero,
StieltjesFunction.id_leftLim, sub_neg_eq_add, zero_add, ENNReal.ofReal_one]
conv_rhs =>
rw [addHaarMeasure_unique StieltjesFunction.id.measure
(stdOrthonormalBasis ℝ ℝ).toBasis.parallelepiped, A]
simp only [volume, Basis.addHaar, one_smul]
theorem volume_val (s) : volume s = StieltjesFunction.id.measure s := by
simp [volume_eq_stieltjes_id]
@[simp]
theorem volume_Ico {a b : ℝ} : volume (Ico a b) = ofReal (b - a) := by simp [volume_val]
@[simp]
theorem volume_real_Ico {a b : ℝ} : volume.real (Ico a b) = max (b - a) 0 := by
simp [measureReal_def, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal']
theorem volume_real_Ico_of_le {a b : ℝ} (hab : a ≤ b) : volume.real (Ico a b) = b - a := by
simp [hab]
@[simp]
theorem volume_Icc {a b : ℝ} : volume (Icc a b) = ofReal (b - a) := by simp [volume_val]
@[simp]
theorem volume_real_Icc {a b : ℝ} : volume.real (Icc a b) = max (b - a) 0 := by
simp [measureReal_def, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal']
theorem volume_real_Icc_of_le {a b : ℝ} (hab : a ≤ b) : volume.real (Icc a b) = b - a := by
simp [hab]
@[simp]
theorem volume_Ioo {a b : ℝ} : volume (Ioo a b) = ofReal (b - a) := by simp [volume_val]
@[simp]
theorem volume_real_Ioo {a b : ℝ} : volume.real (Ioo a b) = max (b - a) 0 := by
simp [measureReal_def, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal']
theorem volume_real_Ioo_of_le {a b : ℝ} (hab : a ≤ b) : volume.real (Ioo a b) = b - a := by
simp [hab]
@[simp]
theorem volume_Ioc {a b : ℝ} : volume (Ioc a b) = ofReal (b - a) := by simp [volume_val]
@[simp]
theorem volume_real_Ioc {a b : ℝ} : volume.real (Ioc a b) = max (b - a) 0 := by
simp [measureReal_def, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal']
theorem volume_real_Ioc_of_le {a b : ℝ} (hab : a ≤ b) : volume.real (Ioc a b) = b - a := by
simp [hab]
theorem volume_singleton {a : ℝ} : volume ({a} : Set ℝ) = 0 := by simp [volume_val]
theorem volume_univ : volume (univ : Set ℝ) = ∞ :=
ENNReal.eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_le fun r =>
calc
(r : ℝ≥0∞) = volume (Icc (0 : ℝ) r) := by simp
_ ≤ volume univ := measure_mono (subset_univ _)
@[simp]
theorem volume_ball (a r : ℝ) : volume (Metric.ball a r) = ofReal (2 * r) := by
rw [ball_eq_Ioo, volume_Ioo, ← sub_add, add_sub_cancel_left, two_mul]
@[simp]
theorem volume_real_ball {a r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) : volume.real (Metric.ball a r) = 2 * r := by
simp [measureReal_def, hr]
@[simp]
theorem volume_closedBall (a r : ℝ) : volume (Metric.closedBall a r) = ofReal (2 * r) := by
rw [closedBall_eq_Icc, volume_Icc, ← sub_add, add_sub_cancel_left, two_mul]
@[simp]
theorem volume_real_closedBall {a r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
volume.real (Metric.closedBall a r) = 2 * r := by
simp [measureReal_def, hr]
@[simp]
theorem volume_emetric_ball (a : ℝ) (r : ℝ≥0∞) : volume (EMetric.ball a r) = 2 * r := by
rcases eq_or_ne r ∞ with (rfl | hr)
· rw [Metric.emetric_ball_top, volume_univ, two_mul, _root_.top_add]
· lift r to ℝ≥0 using hr
rw [Metric.emetric_ball_nnreal, volume_ball, two_mul, ← NNReal.coe_add,
ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal, ENNReal.coe_add, two_mul]
@[simp]
theorem volume_emetric_closedBall (a : ℝ) (r : ℝ≥0∞) : volume (EMetric.closedBall a r) = 2 * r := by
rcases eq_or_ne r ∞ with (rfl | hr)
· rw [EMetric.closedBall_top, volume_univ, two_mul, _root_.top_add]
· lift r to ℝ≥0 using hr
rw [Metric.emetric_closedBall_nnreal, volume_closedBall, two_mul, ← NNReal.coe_add,
ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal, ENNReal.coe_add, two_mul]
instance noAtoms_volume : NoAtoms (volume : Measure ℝ) :=
⟨fun _ => volume_singleton⟩
@[simp]
theorem volume_interval {a b : ℝ} : volume (uIcc a b) = ofReal |b - a| := by
rw [← Icc_min_max, volume_Icc, max_sub_min_eq_abs]
@[simp]
theorem volume_real_interval {a b : ℝ} : volume.real (uIcc a b) = |b - a| := by
simp [measureReal_def]
@[simp]
theorem volume_Ioi {a : ℝ} : volume (Ioi a) = ∞ :=
top_unique <|
le_of_tendsto' ENNReal.tendsto_nat_nhds_top fun n =>
calc
(n : ℝ≥0∞) = volume (Ioo a (a + n)) := by simp
_ ≤ volume (Ioi a) := measure_mono Ioo_subset_Ioi_self
@[simp]
theorem volume_Ici {a : ℝ} : volume (Ici a) = ∞ := by rw [← measure_congr Ioi_ae_eq_Ici]; simp
@[simp]
theorem volume_Iio {a : ℝ} : volume (Iio a) = ∞ :=
top_unique <|
le_of_tendsto' ENNReal.tendsto_nat_nhds_top fun n =>
calc
(n : ℝ≥0∞) = volume (Ioo (a - n) a) := by simp
_ ≤ volume (Iio a) := measure_mono Ioo_subset_Iio_self
@[simp]
theorem volume_Iic {a : ℝ} : volume (Iic a) = ∞ := by rw [← measure_congr Iio_ae_eq_Iic]; simp
instance locallyFinite_volume : IsLocallyFiniteMeasure (volume : Measure ℝ) :=
⟨fun x =>
⟨Ioo (x - 1) (x + 1),
IsOpen.mem_nhds isOpen_Ioo ⟨sub_lt_self _ zero_lt_one, lt_add_of_pos_right _ zero_lt_one⟩, by
simp only [Real.volume_Ioo, ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top]⟩⟩
instance isFiniteMeasure_restrict_Icc (x y : ℝ) : IsFiniteMeasure (volume.restrict (Icc x y)) :=
⟨by simp⟩
instance isFiniteMeasure_restrict_Ico (x y : ℝ) : IsFiniteMeasure (volume.restrict (Ico x y)) :=
⟨by simp⟩
instance isFiniteMeasure_restrict_Ioc (x y : ℝ) : IsFiniteMeasure (volume.restrict (Ioc x y)) :=
⟨by simp⟩
instance isFiniteMeasure_restrict_Ioo (x y : ℝ) : IsFiniteMeasure (volume.restrict (Ioo x y)) :=
⟨by simp⟩
theorem volume_le_diam (s : Set ℝ) : volume s ≤ EMetric.diam s := by
by_cases hs : Bornology.IsBounded s
· rw [Real.ediam_eq hs, ← volume_Icc]
exact volume.mono hs.subset_Icc_sInf_sSup
· rw [Metric.ediam_of_unbounded hs]; exact le_top
theorem _root_.Filter.Eventually.volume_pos_of_nhds_real {p : ℝ → Prop} {a : ℝ}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, p x) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) < volume { x | p x } := by
rcases h.exists_Ioo_subset with ⟨l, u, hx, hs⟩
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ (measure_mono hs)
simpa [-mem_Ioo] using hx.1.trans hx.2
/-!
### Volume of a box in `ℝⁿ`
-/
theorem volume_Icc_pi {a b : ι → ℝ} : volume (Icc a b) = ∏ i, ENNReal.ofReal (b i - a i) := by
rw [← pi_univ_Icc, volume_pi_pi]
simp only [Real.volume_Icc]
@[simp]
theorem volume_Icc_pi_toReal {a b : ι → ℝ} (h : a ≤ b) :
(volume (Icc a b)).toReal = ∏ i, (b i - a i) := by
simp only [volume_Icc_pi, ENNReal.toReal_prod, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (sub_nonneg.2 (h _))]
theorem volume_pi_Ioo {a b : ι → ℝ} :
volume (pi univ fun i => Ioo (a i) (b i)) = ∏ i, ENNReal.ofReal (b i - a i) :=
(measure_congr Measure.univ_pi_Ioo_ae_eq_Icc).trans volume_Icc_pi
@[simp]
theorem volume_pi_Ioo_toReal {a b : ι → ℝ} (h : a ≤ b) :
(volume (pi univ fun i => Ioo (a i) (b i))).toReal = ∏ i, (b i - a i) := by
simp only [volume_pi_Ioo, ENNReal.toReal_prod, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (sub_nonneg.2 (h _))]
theorem volume_pi_Ioc {a b : ι → ℝ} :
volume (pi univ fun i => Ioc (a i) (b i)) = ∏ i, ENNReal.ofReal (b i - a i) :=
(measure_congr Measure.univ_pi_Ioc_ae_eq_Icc).trans volume_Icc_pi
@[simp]
theorem volume_pi_Ioc_toReal {a b : ι → ℝ} (h : a ≤ b) :
(volume (pi univ fun i => Ioc (a i) (b i))).toReal = ∏ i, (b i - a i) := by
simp only [volume_pi_Ioc, ENNReal.toReal_prod, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (sub_nonneg.2 (h _))]
theorem volume_pi_Ico {a b : ι → ℝ} :
volume (pi univ fun i => Ico (a i) (b i)) = ∏ i, ENNReal.ofReal (b i - a i) :=
(measure_congr Measure.univ_pi_Ico_ae_eq_Icc).trans volume_Icc_pi
@[simp]
theorem volume_pi_Ico_toReal {a b : ι → ℝ} (h : a ≤ b) :
(volume (pi univ fun i => Ico (a i) (b i))).toReal = ∏ i, (b i - a i) := by
simp only [volume_pi_Ico, ENNReal.toReal_prod, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (sub_nonneg.2 (h _))]
@[simp]
nonrec theorem volume_pi_ball (a : ι → ℝ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
volume (Metric.ball a r) = ENNReal.ofReal ((2 * r) ^ Fintype.card ι) := by
simp only [MeasureTheory.volume_pi_ball a hr, volume_ball, Finset.prod_const]
exact (ENNReal.ofReal_pow (mul_nonneg zero_le_two hr.le) _).symm
@[simp]
nonrec theorem volume_pi_closedBall (a : ι → ℝ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
volume (Metric.closedBall a r) = ENNReal.ofReal ((2 * r) ^ Fintype.card ι) := by
simp only [MeasureTheory.volume_pi_closedBall a hr, volume_closedBall, Finset.prod_const]
exact (ENNReal.ofReal_pow (mul_nonneg zero_le_two hr) _).symm
theorem volume_pi_le_prod_diam (s : Set (ι → ℝ)) :
volume s ≤ ∏ i : ι, EMetric.diam (Function.eval i '' s) :=
calc
volume s ≤ volume (pi univ fun i => closure (Function.eval i '' s)) :=
volume.mono <|
Subset.trans (subset_pi_eval_image univ s) <| pi_mono fun _ _ => subset_closure
_ = ∏ i, volume (closure <| Function.eval i '' s) := volume_pi_pi _
_ ≤ ∏ i : ι, EMetric.diam (Function.eval i '' s) :=
Finset.prod_le_prod' fun _ _ => (volume_le_diam _).trans_eq (EMetric.diam_closure _)
theorem volume_pi_le_diam_pow (s : Set (ι → ℝ)) : volume s ≤ EMetric.diam s ^ Fintype.card ι :=
calc
volume s ≤ ∏ i : ι, EMetric.diam (Function.eval i '' s) := volume_pi_le_prod_diam s
_ ≤ ∏ _i : ι, (1 : ℝ≥0) * EMetric.diam s :=
(Finset.prod_le_prod' fun i _ => (LipschitzWith.eval i).ediam_image_le s)
_ = EMetric.diam s ^ Fintype.card ι := by
simp only [ENNReal.coe_one, one_mul, Finset.prod_const, Fintype.card]
/-!
### Images of the Lebesgue measure under multiplication in ℝ
-/
theorem smul_map_volume_mul_left {a : ℝ} (h : a ≠ 0) :
ENNReal.ofReal |a| • Measure.map (a * ·) volume = volume := by
refine (Real.measure_ext_Ioo_rat fun p q => ?_).symm
rcases lt_or_gt_of_ne h with h | h
· simp only [Real.volume_Ioo, Measure.smul_apply, ← ENNReal.ofReal_mul (le_of_lt <| neg_pos.2 h),
Measure.map_apply (measurable_const_mul a) measurableSet_Ioo, neg_sub_neg, neg_mul,
preimage_const_mul_Ioo_of_neg _ _ h, abs_of_neg h, mul_sub, smul_eq_mul,
mul_div_cancel₀ _ (ne_of_lt h)]
· simp only [Real.volume_Ioo, Measure.smul_apply, ← ENNReal.ofReal_mul (le_of_lt h),
Measure.map_apply (measurable_const_mul a) measurableSet_Ioo, preimage_const_mul_Ioo _ _ h,
abs_of_pos h, mul_sub, mul_div_cancel₀ _ (ne_of_gt h), smul_eq_mul]
theorem map_volume_mul_left {a : ℝ} (h : a ≠ 0) :
Measure.map (a * ·) volume = ENNReal.ofReal |a⁻¹| • volume := by
conv_rhs =>
rw [← Real.smul_map_volume_mul_left h, smul_smul, ← ENNReal.ofReal_mul (abs_nonneg _), ←
abs_mul, inv_mul_cancel₀ h, abs_one, ENNReal.ofReal_one, one_smul]
@[simp]
theorem volume_preimage_mul_left {a : ℝ} (h : a ≠ 0) (s : Set ℝ) :
volume ((a * ·) ⁻¹' s) = ENNReal.ofReal (abs a⁻¹) * volume s :=
calc
volume ((a * ·) ⁻¹' s) = Measure.map (a * ·) volume s :=
((Homeomorph.mulLeft₀ a h).toMeasurableEquiv.map_apply s).symm
_ = ENNReal.ofReal (abs a⁻¹) * volume s := by rw [map_volume_mul_left h]; rfl
theorem smul_map_volume_mul_right {a : ℝ} (h : a ≠ 0) :
ENNReal.ofReal |a| • Measure.map (· * a) volume = volume := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using Real.smul_map_volume_mul_left h
theorem map_volume_mul_right {a : ℝ} (h : a ≠ 0) :
Measure.map (· * a) volume = ENNReal.ofReal |a⁻¹| • volume := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using Real.map_volume_mul_left h
@[simp]
theorem volume_preimage_mul_right {a : ℝ} (h : a ≠ 0) (s : Set ℝ) :
volume ((· * a) ⁻¹' s) = ENNReal.ofReal (abs a⁻¹) * volume s :=
calc
volume ((· * a) ⁻¹' s) = Measure.map (· * a) volume s :=
((Homeomorph.mulRight₀ a h).toMeasurableEquiv.map_apply s).symm
_ = ENNReal.ofReal (abs a⁻¹) * volume s := by rw [map_volume_mul_right h]; rfl
/-!
### Images of the Lebesgue measure under translation/linear maps in ℝⁿ
-/
open Matrix
/-- A diagonal matrix rescales Lebesgue according to its determinant. This is a special case of
`Real.map_matrix_volume_pi_eq_smul_volume_pi`, that one should use instead (and whose proof
uses this particular case). -/
theorem smul_map_diagonal_volume_pi [DecidableEq ι] {D : ι → ℝ} (h : det (diagonal D) ≠ 0) :
ENNReal.ofReal (abs (det (diagonal D))) • Measure.map (toLin' (diagonal D)) volume =
volume := by
refine (Measure.pi_eq fun s hs => ?_).symm
simp only [det_diagonal, Measure.coe_smul, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, Pi.smul_apply]
rw [Measure.map_apply _ (MeasurableSet.univ_pi hs)]
swap; · exact Continuous.measurable (LinearMap.continuous_on_pi _)
have :
(Matrix.toLin' (diagonal D) ⁻¹' Set.pi Set.univ fun i : ι => s i) =
Set.pi Set.univ fun i : ι => (D i * ·) ⁻¹' s i := by
ext f
simp only [LinearMap.coe_proj, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, LinearMap.smul_apply, mem_univ_pi,
mem_preimage, LinearMap.pi_apply, diagonal_toLin']
have B : ∀ i, ofReal (abs (D i)) * volume ((D i * ·) ⁻¹' s i) = volume (s i) := by
intro i
have A : D i ≠ 0 := by
simp only [det_diagonal, Ne] at h
exact Finset.prod_ne_zero_iff.1 h i (Finset.mem_univ i)
rw [volume_preimage_mul_left A, ← mul_assoc, ← ENNReal.ofReal_mul (abs_nonneg _), ← abs_mul,
mul_inv_cancel₀ A, abs_one, ENNReal.ofReal_one, one_mul]
rw [this, volume_pi_pi, Finset.abs_prod,
ENNReal.ofReal_prod_of_nonneg fun i _ => abs_nonneg (D i), ← Finset.prod_mul_distrib]
simp only [B]
/-- A transvection preserves Lebesgue measure. -/
theorem volume_preserving_transvectionStruct [DecidableEq ι] (t : TransvectionStruct ι ℝ) :
MeasurePreserving (toLin' t.toMatrix) := by
/- We use `lmarginal` to conveniently use Fubini's theorem.
Along the coordinate where there is a shearing, it acts like a
translation, and therefore preserves Lebesgue. -/
have ht : Measurable (toLin' t.toMatrix) :=
(toLin' t.toMatrix).continuous_of_finiteDimensional.measurable
refine ⟨ht, ?_⟩
refine (pi_eq fun s hs ↦ ?_).symm
have h2s : MeasurableSet (univ.pi s) := .pi countable_univ fun i _ ↦ hs i
simp_rw [← pi_pi, ← lintegral_indicator_one h2s]
rw [lintegral_map (measurable_one.indicator h2s) ht, volume_pi]
refine lintegral_eq_of_lmarginal_eq {t.i} ((measurable_one.indicator h2s).comp ht)
(measurable_one.indicator h2s) ?_
simp_rw [lmarginal_singleton]
ext x
cases t with | mk t_i t_j t_hij t_c =>
simp [transvection, mulVec_stdBasisMatrix, t_hij.symm, ← Function.update_add,
lintegral_add_right_eq_self fun xᵢ ↦ indicator (univ.pi s) 1 (Function.update x t_i xᵢ)]
/-- Any invertible matrix rescales Lebesgue measure through the absolute value of its
determinant. -/
theorem map_matrix_volume_pi_eq_smul_volume_pi [DecidableEq ι] {M : Matrix ι ι ℝ} (hM : det M ≠ 0) :
Measure.map (toLin' M) volume = ENNReal.ofReal (abs (det M)⁻¹) • volume := by
-- This follows from the cases we have already proved, of diagonal matrices and transvections,
-- as these matrices generate all invertible matrices.
apply diagonal_transvection_induction_of_det_ne_zero _ M hM
· intro D hD
conv_rhs => rw [← smul_map_diagonal_volume_pi hD]
rw [smul_smul, ← ENNReal.ofReal_mul (abs_nonneg _), ← abs_mul, inv_mul_cancel₀ hD, abs_one,
ENNReal.ofReal_one, one_smul]
· intro t
simp_rw [Matrix.TransvectionStruct.det, _root_.inv_one, abs_one, ENNReal.ofReal_one, one_smul,
(volume_preserving_transvectionStruct _).map_eq]
· intro A B _ _ IHA IHB
rw [toLin'_mul, det_mul, LinearMap.coe_comp, ← Measure.map_map, IHB, Measure.map_smul, IHA,
smul_smul, ← ENNReal.ofReal_mul (abs_nonneg _), ← abs_mul, mul_comm, mul_inv]
· apply Continuous.measurable
apply LinearMap.continuous_on_pi
· apply Continuous.measurable
apply LinearMap.continuous_on_pi
/-- Any invertible linear map rescales Lebesgue measure through the absolute value of its
determinant. -/
theorem map_linearMap_volume_pi_eq_smul_volume_pi {f : (ι → ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] ι → ℝ}
(hf : LinearMap.det f ≠ 0) : Measure.map f volume =
ENNReal.ofReal (abs (LinearMap.det f)⁻¹) • volume := by
classical
-- this is deduced from the matrix case
let M := LinearMap.toMatrix' f
have A : LinearMap.det f = det M := by simp only [M, LinearMap.det_toMatrix']
have B : f = toLin' M := by simp only [M, toLin'_toMatrix']
rw [A, B]
apply map_matrix_volume_pi_eq_smul_volume_pi
rwa [A] at hf
end Real
section regionBetween
variable {α : Type*}
/-- The region between two real-valued functions on an arbitrary set. -/
def regionBetween (f g : α → ℝ) (s : Set α) : Set (α × ℝ) :=
{ p : α × ℝ | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ∈ Ioo (f p.1) (g p.1) }
theorem regionBetween_subset (f g : α → ℝ) (s : Set α) : regionBetween f g s ⊆ s ×ˢ univ := by
simpa only [prod_univ, regionBetween, Set.preimage, setOf_subset_setOf] using fun a => And.left
variable [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} {f g : α → ℝ} {s : Set α}
/-- The region between two measurable functions on a measurable set is measurable. -/
theorem measurableSet_regionBetween (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
MeasurableSet (regionBetween f g s) := by
dsimp only [regionBetween, Ioo, mem_setOf_eq, setOf_and]
refine
MeasurableSet.inter ?_
((measurableSet_lt (hf.comp measurable_fst) measurable_snd).inter
(measurableSet_lt measurable_snd (hg.comp measurable_fst)))
exact measurable_fst hs
/-- The region between two measurable functions on a measurable set is measurable;
a version for the region together with the graph of the upper function. -/
theorem measurableSet_region_between_oc (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) :
MeasurableSet { p : α × ℝ | p.fst ∈ s ∧ p.snd ∈ Ioc (f p.fst) (g p.fst) } := by
dsimp only [regionBetween, Ioc, mem_setOf_eq, setOf_and]
refine
MeasurableSet.inter ?_
((measurableSet_lt (hf.comp measurable_fst) measurable_snd).inter
(measurableSet_le measurable_snd (hg.comp measurable_fst)))
exact measurable_fst hs
/-- The region between two measurable functions on a measurable set is measurable;
a version for the region together with the graph of the lower function. -/
theorem measurableSet_region_between_co (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) :
MeasurableSet { p : α × ℝ | p.fst ∈ s ∧ p.snd ∈ Ico (f p.fst) (g p.fst) } := by
dsimp only [regionBetween, Ico, mem_setOf_eq, setOf_and]
refine
MeasurableSet.inter ?_
((measurableSet_le (hf.comp measurable_fst) measurable_snd).inter
(measurableSet_lt measurable_snd (hg.comp measurable_fst)))
exact measurable_fst hs
/-- The region between two measurable functions on a measurable set is measurable;
a version for the region together with the graphs of both functions. -/
theorem measurableSet_region_between_cc (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) :
MeasurableSet { p : α × ℝ | p.fst ∈ s ∧ p.snd ∈ Icc (f p.fst) (g p.fst) } := by
dsimp only [regionBetween, Icc, mem_setOf_eq, setOf_and]
refine
MeasurableSet.inter ?_
((measurableSet_le (hf.comp measurable_fst) measurable_snd).inter
(measurableSet_le measurable_snd (hg.comp measurable_fst)))
exact measurable_fst hs
/-- The graph of a measurable function is a measurable set. -/
theorem measurableSet_graph (hf : Measurable f) :
MeasurableSet { p : α × ℝ | p.snd = f p.fst } := by
simpa using measurableSet_region_between_cc hf hf MeasurableSet.univ
theorem volume_regionBetween_eq_lintegral' (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.prod volume (regionBetween f g s) = ∫⁻ y in s, ENNReal.ofReal ((g - f) y) ∂μ := by
classical
rw [Measure.prod_apply]
· have h :
(fun x => volume { a | x ∈ s ∧ a ∈ Ioo (f x) (g x) }) =
s.indicator fun x => ENNReal.ofReal (g x - f x) := by
funext x
rw [indicator_apply]
split_ifs with h
· have hx : { a | x ∈ s ∧ a ∈ Ioo (f x) (g x) } = Ioo (f x) (g x) := by simp [h, Ioo]
simp only [hx, Real.volume_Ioo, sub_zero]
· have hx : { a | x ∈ s ∧ a ∈ Ioo (f x) (g x) } = ∅ := by simp [h]
simp only [hx, measure_empty]
dsimp only [regionBetween, preimage_setOf_eq]
rw [h, lintegral_indicator] <;> simp only [hs, Pi.sub_apply]
· exact measurableSet_regionBetween hf hg hs
/-- The volume of the region between two almost everywhere measurable functions on a measurable set
can be represented as a Lebesgue integral. -/
theorem volume_regionBetween_eq_lintegral [SFinite μ] (hf : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s))
(hg : AEMeasurable g (μ.restrict s)) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.prod volume (regionBetween f g s) = ∫⁻ y in s, ENNReal.ofReal ((g - f) y) ∂μ := by
have h₁ :
(fun y => ENNReal.ofReal ((g - f) y)) =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] fun y =>
ENNReal.ofReal ((AEMeasurable.mk g hg - AEMeasurable.mk f hf) y) :=
(hg.ae_eq_mk.sub hf.ae_eq_mk).fun_comp ENNReal.ofReal
have h₂ :
(μ.restrict s).prod volume (regionBetween f g s) =
(μ.restrict s).prod volume
(regionBetween (AEMeasurable.mk f hf) (AEMeasurable.mk g hg) s) := by
apply measure_congr
apply EventuallyEq.rfl.inter
exact
((quasiMeasurePreserving_fst.ae_eq_comp hf.ae_eq_mk).comp₂ _ EventuallyEq.rfl).inter
(EventuallyEq.rfl.comp₂ _ <| quasiMeasurePreserving_fst.ae_eq_comp hg.ae_eq_mk)
rw [lintegral_congr_ae h₁, ←
volume_regionBetween_eq_lintegral' hf.measurable_mk hg.measurable_mk hs]
convert h₂ using 1
· rw [Measure.restrict_prod_eq_prod_univ]
exact (Measure.restrict_eq_self _ (regionBetween_subset f g s)).symm
· rw [Measure.restrict_prod_eq_prod_univ]
exact
(Measure.restrict_eq_self _
(regionBetween_subset (AEMeasurable.mk f hf) (AEMeasurable.mk g hg) s)).symm
/-- The region between two a.e.-measurable functions on a null-measurable set is null-measurable. -/
lemma nullMeasurableSet_regionBetween (μ : Measure α)
{f g : α → ℝ} (f_mble : AEMeasurable f μ) (g_mble : AEMeasurable g μ)
{s : Set α} (s_mble : NullMeasurableSet s μ) :
NullMeasurableSet {p : α × ℝ | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.snd ∈ Ioo (f p.fst) (g p.fst)} (μ.prod volume) := by
refine NullMeasurableSet.inter
(s_mble.preimage quasiMeasurePreserving_fst) (NullMeasurableSet.inter ?_ ?_)
· exact nullMeasurableSet_lt (AEMeasurable.fst f_mble) measurable_snd.aemeasurable
· exact nullMeasurableSet_lt measurable_snd.aemeasurable (AEMeasurable.fst g_mble)
/-- The region between two a.e.-measurable functions on a null-measurable set is null-measurable;
a version for the region together with the graph of the upper function. -/
lemma nullMeasurableSet_region_between_oc (μ : Measure α)
{f g : α → ℝ} (f_mble : AEMeasurable f μ) (g_mble : AEMeasurable g μ)
{s : Set α} (s_mble : NullMeasurableSet s μ) :
NullMeasurableSet {p : α × ℝ | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.snd ∈ Ioc (f p.fst) (g p.fst)} (μ.prod volume) := by
refine NullMeasurableSet.inter
(s_mble.preimage quasiMeasurePreserving_fst) (NullMeasurableSet.inter ?_ ?_)
· exact nullMeasurableSet_lt (AEMeasurable.fst f_mble) measurable_snd.aemeasurable
· change NullMeasurableSet {p : α × ℝ | p.snd ≤ g p.fst} (μ.prod volume)
rw [show {p : α × ℝ | p.snd ≤ g p.fst} = {p : α × ℝ | g p.fst < p.snd}ᶜ by
ext p
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, mem_compl_iff, not_lt]]
exact (nullMeasurableSet_lt (AEMeasurable.fst g_mble) measurable_snd.aemeasurable).compl
/-- The region between two a.e.-measurable functions on a null-measurable set is null-measurable;
a version for the region together with the graph of the lower function. -/
lemma nullMeasurableSet_region_between_co (μ : Measure α)
{f g : α → ℝ} (f_mble : AEMeasurable f μ) (g_mble : AEMeasurable g μ)
{s : Set α} (s_mble : NullMeasurableSet s μ) :
NullMeasurableSet {p : α × ℝ | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.snd ∈ Ico (f p.fst) (g p.fst)} (μ.prod volume) := by
refine NullMeasurableSet.inter
(s_mble.preimage quasiMeasurePreserving_fst) (NullMeasurableSet.inter ?_ ?_)
· change NullMeasurableSet {p : α × ℝ | f p.fst ≤ p.snd} (μ.prod volume)
rw [show {p : α × ℝ | f p.fst ≤ p.snd} = {p : α × ℝ | p.snd < f p.fst}ᶜ by
ext p
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, mem_compl_iff, not_lt]]
exact (nullMeasurableSet_lt measurable_snd.aemeasurable (AEMeasurable.fst f_mble)).compl
· exact nullMeasurableSet_lt measurable_snd.aemeasurable (AEMeasurable.fst g_mble)
/-- The region between two a.e.-measurable functions on a null-measurable set is null-measurable;
a version for the region together with the graphs of both functions. -/
lemma nullMeasurableSet_region_between_cc (μ : Measure α)
{f g : α → ℝ} (f_mble : AEMeasurable f μ) (g_mble : AEMeasurable g μ)
{s : Set α} (s_mble : NullMeasurableSet s μ) :
NullMeasurableSet {p : α × ℝ | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.snd ∈ Icc (f p.fst) (g p.fst)} (μ.prod volume) := by
refine NullMeasurableSet.inter
(s_mble.preimage quasiMeasurePreserving_fst) (NullMeasurableSet.inter ?_ ?_)
· change NullMeasurableSet {p : α × ℝ | f p.fst ≤ p.snd} (μ.prod volume)
rw [show {p : α × ℝ | f p.fst ≤ p.snd} = {p : α × ℝ | p.snd < f p.fst}ᶜ by
ext p
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, mem_compl_iff, not_lt]]
exact (nullMeasurableSet_lt measurable_snd.aemeasurable (AEMeasurable.fst f_mble)).compl
· change NullMeasurableSet {p : α × ℝ | p.snd ≤ g p.fst} (μ.prod volume)
rw [show {p : α × ℝ | p.snd ≤ g p.fst} = {p : α × ℝ | g p.fst < p.snd}ᶜ by
ext p
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, mem_compl_iff, not_lt]]
exact (nullMeasurableSet_lt (AEMeasurable.fst g_mble) measurable_snd.aemeasurable).compl
end regionBetween
|
/-- Consider a real set `s`. If a property is true almost everywhere in `s ∩ (a, b)` for
all `a, b ∈ s`, then it is true almost everywhere in `s`. Formulated with `μ.restrict`.
See also `ae_of_mem_of_ae_of_mem_inter_Ioo`. -/
theorem ae_restrict_of_ae_restrict_inter_Ioo {μ : Measure ℝ} [NoAtoms μ] {s : Set ℝ} {p : ℝ → Prop}
(h : ∀ a b, a ∈ s → b ∈ s → a < b → ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict (s ∩ Ioo a b), p x) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, p x := by
/- By second-countability, we cover `s` by countably many intervals `(a, b)` (except maybe for
two endpoints, which don't matter since `μ` does not have any atom). -/
let T : s × s → Set ℝ := fun p => Ioo p.1 p.2
let u := ⋃ i : ↥s × ↥s, T i
have hfinite : (s \ u).Finite := s.finite_diff_iUnion_Ioo'
obtain ⟨A, A_count, hA⟩ :
∃ A : Set (↥s × ↥s), A.Countable ∧ ⋃ i ∈ A, T i = ⋃ i : ↥s × ↥s, T i :=
isOpen_iUnion_countable _ fun p => isOpen_Ioo
have : s ⊆ s \ u ∪ ⋃ p ∈ A, s ∩ T p := by
intro x hx
by_cases h'x : x ∈ ⋃ i : ↥s × ↥s, T i
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Lebesgue/Basic.lean | 600 | 617 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Decomposition.RadonNikodym
/-!
# Exponentially tilted measures
The exponential tilting of a measure `μ` on `α` by a function `f : α → ℝ` is the measure with
density `x ↦ exp (f x) / ∫ y, exp (f y) ∂μ` with respect to `μ`. This is sometimes also called
the Esscher transform.
The definition is mostly used for `f` linear, in which case the exponentially tilted measure belongs
to the natural exponential family of the base measure. Exponentially tilted measures for general `f`
can be used for example to establish variational expressions for the Kullback-Leibler divergence.
## Main definitions
* `Measure.tilted μ f`: exponential tilting of `μ` by `f`, equal to
`μ.withDensity (fun x ↦ ENNReal.ofReal (exp (f x) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ))`.
-/
open Real
open scoped ENNReal NNReal
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f : α → ℝ}
/-- Exponentially tilted measure. When `x ↦ exp (f x)` is integrable, `μ.tilted f` is the
probability measure with density with respect to `μ` proportional to `exp (f x)`. Otherwise it is 0.
-/
noncomputable
def Measure.tilted (μ : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ) : Measure α :=
μ.withDensity (fun x ↦ ENNReal.ofReal (exp (f x) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ))
@[simp]
lemma tilted_of_not_integrable (hf : ¬ Integrable (fun x ↦ exp (f x)) μ) : μ.tilted f = 0 := by
rw [Measure.tilted, integral_undef hf]
simp
@[simp]
lemma tilted_of_not_aemeasurable (hf : ¬ AEMeasurable f μ) : μ.tilted f = 0 := by
refine tilted_of_not_integrable ?_
suffices ¬ AEMeasurable (fun x ↦ exp (f x)) μ by exact fun h ↦ this h.1.aemeasurable
exact fun h ↦ hf (aemeasurable_of_aemeasurable_exp h)
@[simp]
lemma tilted_zero_measure (f : α → ℝ) : (0 : Measure α).tilted f = 0 := by simp [Measure.tilted]
@[simp]
lemma tilted_const' (μ : Measure α) (c : ℝ) :
μ.tilted (fun _ ↦ c) = (μ Set.univ)⁻¹ • μ := by
cases eq_zero_or_neZero μ with
| inl h => rw [h]; simp
| inr h0 =>
simp only [Measure.tilted, withDensity_const, integral_const, smul_eq_mul]
by_cases h_univ : μ Set.univ = ∞
· simp only [measureReal_def, h_univ, ENNReal.toReal_top, zero_mul, div_zero,
ENNReal.ofReal_zero, zero_smul, ENNReal.inv_top]
congr
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_inv, mul_comm, mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel₀ (exp_pos _).ne', mul_one,
measureReal_def, ← ENNReal.toReal_inv, ENNReal.ofReal_toReal]
simp [h0.out]
lemma tilted_const (μ : Measure α) [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (c : ℝ) :
μ.tilted (fun _ ↦ c) = μ := by simp
@[simp]
lemma tilted_zero' (μ : Measure α) : μ.tilted 0 = (μ Set.univ)⁻¹ • μ := by
change μ.tilted (fun _ ↦ 0) = (μ Set.univ)⁻¹ • μ
simp
lemma tilted_zero (μ : Measure α) [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] : μ.tilted 0 = μ := by simp
lemma tilted_congr {g : α → ℝ} (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
μ.tilted f = μ.tilted g := by
have h_int_eq : ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ = ∫ x, exp (g x) ∂μ := by
refine integral_congr_ae ?_
filter_upwards [hfg] with x hx
rw [hx]
refine withDensity_congr_ae ?_
filter_upwards [hfg] with x hx
rw [h_int_eq, hx]
lemma tilted_eq_withDensity_nnreal (μ : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ) :
μ.tilted f = μ.withDensity (fun x ↦ ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞)
(⟨exp (f x) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ, by positivity⟩ : ℝ≥0)) := by
rw [Measure.tilted]
congr with x
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_eq_coe_nnreal]
lemma tilted_apply' (μ : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.tilted f s = ∫⁻ a in s, ENNReal.ofReal (exp (f a) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ) ∂μ := by
rw [Measure.tilted, withDensity_apply _ hs]
lemma tilted_apply (μ : Measure α) [SFinite μ] (f : α → ℝ) (s : Set α) :
μ.tilted f s = ∫⁻ a in s, ENNReal.ofReal (exp (f a) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ) ∂μ := by
rw [Measure.tilted, withDensity_apply' _ s]
lemma tilted_apply_eq_ofReal_integral' {s : Set α} (f : α → ℝ) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.tilted f s = ENNReal.ofReal (∫ a in s, exp (f a) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ ∂μ) := by
by_cases hf : Integrable (fun x ↦ exp (f x)) μ
· rw [tilted_apply' _ _ hs, ← ofReal_integral_eq_lintegral_ofReal]
· exact hf.integrableOn.div_const _
· exact ae_of_all _ (fun _ ↦ by positivity)
· simp only [hf, not_false_eq_true, tilted_of_not_integrable, Measure.coe_zero,
Pi.zero_apply, integral_undef hf, div_zero, integral_zero, ENNReal.ofReal_zero]
lemma tilted_apply_eq_ofReal_integral [SFinite μ] (f : α → ℝ) (s : Set α) :
μ.tilted f s = ENNReal.ofReal (∫ a in s, exp (f a) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ ∂μ) := by
by_cases hf : Integrable (fun x ↦ exp (f x)) μ
· rw [tilted_apply _ _, ← ofReal_integral_eq_lintegral_ofReal]
· exact hf.integrableOn.div_const _
· exact ae_of_all _ (fun _ ↦ by positivity)
· simp [tilted_of_not_integrable hf, integral_undef hf]
lemma isProbabilityMeasure_tilted [NeZero μ] (hf : Integrable (fun x ↦ exp (f x)) μ) :
IsProbabilityMeasure (μ.tilted f) := by
constructor
simp_rw [tilted_apply' _ _ MeasurableSet.univ, setLIntegral_univ,
ENNReal.ofReal_div_of_pos (integral_exp_pos hf), div_eq_mul_inv]
rw [lintegral_mul_const'' _ hf.1.aemeasurable.ennreal_ofReal,
← ofReal_integral_eq_lintegral_ofReal hf (ae_of_all _ fun _ ↦ (exp_pos _).le),
ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel]
· simp only [ne_eq, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero, not_le]
exact integral_exp_pos hf
· simp
instance isZeroOrProbabilityMeasure_tilted : IsZeroOrProbabilityMeasure (μ.tilted f) := by
rcases eq_zero_or_neZero μ with hμ | hμ
· simp only [hμ, tilted_zero_measure]
infer_instance
by_cases hf : Integrable (fun x ↦ exp (f x)) μ
· have := isProbabilityMeasure_tilted hf
infer_instance
· simp only [hf, not_false_eq_true, tilted_of_not_integrable]
infer_instance
section lintegral
lemma setLIntegral_tilted' (f : α → ℝ) (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂(μ.tilted f)
= ∫⁻ x in s, ENNReal.ofReal (exp (f x) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ) * g x ∂μ := by
by_cases hf : AEMeasurable f μ
· rw [Measure.tilted, setLIntegral_withDensity_eq_setLIntegral_mul_non_measurable₀]
· simp only [Pi.mul_apply]
· refine AEMeasurable.restrict ?_
exact ((measurable_exp.comp_aemeasurable hf).div_const _).ennreal_ofReal
· exact hs
· filter_upwards
simp only [ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top, implies_true]
· have hf' : ¬ Integrable (fun x ↦ exp (f x)) μ := by
exact fun h ↦ hf (aemeasurable_of_aemeasurable_exp h.1.aemeasurable)
simp only [hf, not_false_eq_true, tilted_of_not_aemeasurable, Measure.restrict_zero,
lintegral_zero_measure]
rw [integral_undef hf']
simp
lemma setLIntegral_tilted [SFinite μ] (f : α → ℝ) (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂(μ.tilted f)
= ∫⁻ x in s, ENNReal.ofReal (exp (f x) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ) * g x ∂μ := by
by_cases hf : AEMeasurable f μ
· rw [Measure.tilted, setLIntegral_withDensity_eq_setLIntegral_mul_non_measurable₀']
· simp only [Pi.mul_apply]
· refine AEMeasurable.restrict ?_
exact ((measurable_exp.comp_aemeasurable hf).div_const _).ennreal_ofReal
· filter_upwards
simp only [ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top, implies_true]
· have hf' : ¬ Integrable (fun x ↦ exp (f x)) μ := by
exact fun h ↦ hf (aemeasurable_of_aemeasurable_exp h.1.aemeasurable)
simp only [hf, not_false_eq_true, tilted_of_not_aemeasurable, Measure.restrict_zero,
lintegral_zero_measure]
rw [integral_undef hf']
simp
lemma lintegral_tilted (f : α → ℝ) (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ x, g x ∂(μ.tilted f)
= ∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (exp (f x) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ) * (g x) ∂μ := by
rw [← setLIntegral_univ, setLIntegral_tilted' f g MeasurableSet.univ, setLIntegral_univ]
end lintegral
section integral
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
lemma setIntegral_tilted' (f : α → ℝ) (g : α → E) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∫ x in s, g x ∂(μ.tilted f) = ∫ x in s, (exp (f x) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ) • (g x) ∂μ := by
by_cases hf : AEMeasurable f μ
· rw [tilted_eq_withDensity_nnreal, setIntegral_withDensity_eq_setIntegral_smul₀ _ _ hs]
· congr
· suffices AEMeasurable (fun x ↦ exp (f x) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ) μ by
rw [← aemeasurable_coe_nnreal_real_iff]
refine AEMeasurable.restrict ?_
simpa only [NNReal.coe_mk]
exact (measurable_exp.comp_aemeasurable hf).div_const _
· have hf' : ¬ Integrable (fun x ↦ exp (f x)) μ := by
exact fun h ↦ hf (aemeasurable_of_aemeasurable_exp h.1.aemeasurable)
simp only [hf, not_false_eq_true, tilted_of_not_aemeasurable, Measure.restrict_zero,
integral_zero_measure]
rw [integral_undef hf']
simp
lemma setIntegral_tilted [SFinite μ] (f : α → ℝ) (g : α → E) (s : Set α) :
∫ x in s, g x ∂(μ.tilted f) = ∫ x in s, (exp (f x) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ) • (g x) ∂μ := by
by_cases hf : AEMeasurable f μ
· rw [tilted_eq_withDensity_nnreal, setIntegral_withDensity_eq_setIntegral_smul₀']
· congr
· suffices AEMeasurable (fun x ↦ exp (f x) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ) μ by
rw [← aemeasurable_coe_nnreal_real_iff]
refine AEMeasurable.restrict ?_
simpa only [NNReal.coe_mk]
exact (measurable_exp.comp_aemeasurable hf).div_const _
· have hf' : ¬ Integrable (fun x ↦ exp (f x)) μ := by
exact fun h ↦ hf (aemeasurable_of_aemeasurable_exp h.1.aemeasurable)
simp only [hf, not_false_eq_true, tilted_of_not_aemeasurable, Measure.restrict_zero,
integral_zero_measure]
rw [integral_undef hf']
simp
lemma integral_tilted (f : α → ℝ) (g : α → E) :
∫ x, g x ∂(μ.tilted f) = ∫ x, (exp (f x) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ) • (g x) ∂μ := by
rw [← setIntegral_univ, setIntegral_tilted' f g MeasurableSet.univ, setIntegral_univ]
end integral
lemma integral_exp_tilted (f g : α → ℝ) :
∫ x, exp (g x) ∂(μ.tilted f) = (∫ x, exp ((f + g) x) ∂μ) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ := by
cases eq_zero_or_neZero μ with
| inl h => rw [h]; simp
| inr h0 =>
rw [integral_tilted f]
simp_rw [smul_eq_mul]
have : ∀ x, (exp (f x) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ) * exp (g x)
= (exp ((f + g) x) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ) := by
intro x
rw [Pi.add_apply, exp_add]
ring
simp_rw [this, div_eq_mul_inv]
rw [integral_mul_const]
lemma tilted_tilted (hf : Integrable (fun x ↦ exp (f x)) μ) (g : α → ℝ) :
(μ.tilted f).tilted g = μ.tilted (f + g) := by
cases eq_zero_or_neZero μ with
| inl h => simp [h]
| inr h0 =>
ext1 s hs
rw [tilted_apply' _ _ hs, tilted_apply' _ _ hs, setLIntegral_tilted' f _ hs]
congr with x
rw [← ENNReal.ofReal_mul (by positivity),
integral_exp_tilted f, Pi.add_apply, exp_add]
| congr 1
simp only [Pi.add_apply]
field_simp
ring_nf
congr 1
rw [mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel₀, mul_one]
exact (integral_exp_pos hf).ne'
lemma tilted_comm (hf : Integrable (fun x ↦ exp (f x)) μ) {g : α → ℝ}
(hg : Integrable (fun x ↦ exp (g x)) μ) :
(μ.tilted f).tilted g = (μ.tilted g).tilted f := by
rw [tilted_tilted hf, add_comm, tilted_tilted hg]
@[simp]
lemma tilted_neg_same' (hf : Integrable (fun x ↦ exp (f x)) μ) :
(μ.tilted f).tilted (-f) = (μ Set.univ)⁻¹ • μ := by
rw [tilted_tilted hf]; simp
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Tilted.lean | 257 | 273 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.PInfty
/-!
# Decomposition of the Q endomorphisms
In this file, we obtain a lemma `decomposition_Q` which expresses
explicitly the projection `(Q q).f (n+1) : X _⦋n+1⦌ ⟶ X _⦋n+1⦌`
(`X : SimplicialObject C` with `C` a preadditive category) as
a sum of terms which are postcompositions with degeneracies.
(TODO @joelriou: when `C` is abelian, define the degenerate
subcomplex of the alternating face map complex of `X` and show
that it is a complement to the normalized Moore complex.)
Then, we introduce an ad hoc structure `MorphComponents X n Z` which
can be used in order to define morphisms `X _⦋n+1⦌ ⟶ Z` using the
decomposition provided by `decomposition_Q`. This shall play a critical
role in the proof that the functor
`N₁ : SimplicialObject C ⥤ Karoubi (ChainComplex C ℕ))`
reflects isomorphisms.
(See `Equivalence.lean` for the general strategy of proof of the Dold-Kan equivalence.)
-/
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Preadditive
Opposite Simplicial
noncomputable section
namespace AlgebraicTopology
namespace DoldKan
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] [Preadditive C] {X X' : SimplicialObject C}
/-- In each positive degree, this lemma decomposes the idempotent endomorphism
`Q q` as a sum of morphisms which are postcompositions with suitable degeneracies.
As `Q q` is the complement projection to `P q`, this implies that in the case of
simplicial abelian groups, any $(n+1)$-simplex $x$ can be decomposed as
$x = x' + \sum (i=0}^{q-1} σ_{n-i}(y_i)$ where $x'$ is in the image of `P q` and
the $y_i$ are in degree $n$. -/
theorem decomposition_Q (n q : ℕ) :
((Q q).f (n + 1) : X _⦋n + 1⦌ ⟶ X _⦋n + 1⦌) =
| ∑ i : Fin (n + 1) with i.val < q, (P i).f (n + 1) ≫ X.δ i.rev.succ ≫ X.σ (Fin.rev i) := by
induction' q with q hq
· simp only [Q_zero, HomologicalComplex.zero_f_apply, Nat.not_lt_zero,
Finset.filter_False, Finset.sum_empty]
· by_cases hqn : q + 1 ≤ n + 1
swap
· rw [Q_is_eventually_constant (show n + 1 ≤ q by omega), hq]
congr 1
ext ⟨x, hx⟩
simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Finset.mem_filter, Finset.mem_univ, true_and]
omega
· obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := Nat.le.dest (Nat.succ_le_succ_iff.mp hqn)
rw [Q_succ, HomologicalComplex.sub_f_apply, HomologicalComplex.comp_f, hq]
symm
conv_rhs => rw [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm]
let q' : Fin (n + 1) := ⟨q, Nat.succ_le_iff.mp hqn⟩
rw [← @Finset.add_sum_erase _ _ _ _ _ _ q' (by simp [q'])]
congr
· have hnaq' : n = a + q := by omega
simp only [Fin.val_mk, (HigherFacesVanish.of_P q n).comp_Hσ_eq hnaq',
q'.rev_eq hnaq', neg_neg]
rfl
· ext ⟨i, hi⟩
simp only [q', Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Nat.lt_succ_iff_lt_or_eq, Finset.mem_univ,
forall_true_left, Finset.mem_filter, lt_self_iff_false, or_true, and_self, not_true,
Finset.mem_erase, ne_eq, Fin.mk.injEq, true_and]
aesop
variable (X)
| Mathlib/AlgebraicTopology/DoldKan/Decomposition.lean | 52 | 81 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Nat.Defs
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Category.Preorder
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EqToHom
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.Const
import Mathlib.Order.Fin.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
import Mathlib.Tactic.SuppressCompilation
/-!
# Composable arrows
If `C` is a category, the type of `n`-simplices in the nerve of `C` identifies
to the type of functors `Fin (n + 1) ⥤ C`, which can be thought as families of `n` composable
arrows in `C`. In this file, we introduce and study this category `ComposableArrows C n`
of `n` composable arrows in `C`.
If `F : ComposableArrows C n`, we define `F.left` as the leftmost object, `F.right` as the
rightmost object, and `F.hom : F.left ⟶ F.right` is the canonical map.
The most significant definition in this file is the constructor
`F.precomp f : ComposableArrows C (n + 1)` for `F : ComposableArrows C n` and `f : X ⟶ F.left`:
"it shifts `F` towards the right and inserts `f` on the left". This `precomp` has
good definitional properties.
In the namespace `CategoryTheory.ComposableArrows`, we provide constructors
like `mk₁ f`, `mk₂ f g`, `mk₃ f g h` for `ComposableArrows C n` for small `n`.
TODO (@joelriou):
* redefine `Arrow C` as `ComposableArrow C 1`?
* construct some elements in `ComposableArrows m (Fin (n + 1))` for small `n`
the precomposition with which shall induce functors
`ComposableArrows C n ⥤ ComposableArrows C m` which correspond to simplicial operations
(specifically faces) with good definitional properties (this might be necessary for
up to `n = 7` in order to formalize spectral sequences following Verdier)
-/
/-!
New `simprocs` that run even in `dsimp` have caused breakages in this file.
(e.g. `dsimp` can now simplify `2 + 3` to `5`)
For now, we just turn off simprocs in this file.
We'll soon provide finer grained options here, e.g. to turn off simprocs only in `dsimp`, etc.
*However*, hopefully it is possible to refactor the material here so that no backwards compatibility
`set_option`s are required at all
-/
set_option simprocs false
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category
variable (C : Type*) [Category C]
/-- `ComposableArrows C n` is the type of functors `Fin (n + 1) ⥤ C`. -/
abbrev ComposableArrows (n : ℕ) := Fin (n + 1) ⥤ C
namespace ComposableArrows
variable {C} {n m : ℕ}
variable (F G : ComposableArrows C n)
/-- A wrapper for `omega` which prefaces it with some quick and useful attempts -/
macro "valid" : tactic =>
`(tactic| first | assumption | apply zero_le | apply le_rfl | transitivity <;> assumption | omega)
/-- The `i`th object (with `i : ℕ` such that `i ≤ n`) of `F : ComposableArrows C n`. -/
@[simp]
abbrev obj' (i : ℕ) (hi : i ≤ n := by valid) : C := F.obj ⟨i, by omega⟩
/-- The map `F.obj' i ⟶ F.obj' j` when `F : ComposableArrows C n`, and `i` and `j`
are natural numbers such that `i ≤ j ≤ n`. -/
@[simp]
abbrev map' (i j : ℕ) (hij : i ≤ j := by valid) (hjn : j ≤ n := by valid) :
F.obj ⟨i, by omega⟩ ⟶ F.obj ⟨j, by omega⟩ := F.map (homOfLE (by
simp only [Fin.mk_le_mk]
valid))
lemma map'_self (i : ℕ) (hi : i ≤ n := by valid) :
F.map' i i = 𝟙 _ := F.map_id _
lemma map'_comp (i j k : ℕ) (hij : i ≤ j := by valid)
(hjk : j ≤ k := by valid) (hk : k ≤ n := by valid) :
F.map' i k = F.map' i j ≫ F.map' j k :=
F.map_comp _ _
/-- The leftmost object of `F : ComposableArrows C n`. -/
abbrev left := obj' F 0
/-- The rightmost object of `F : ComposableArrows C n`. -/
abbrev right := obj' F n
/-- The canonical map `F.left ⟶ F.right` for `F : ComposableArrows C n`. -/
abbrev hom : F.left ⟶ F.right := map' F 0 n
variable {F G}
/-- The map `F.obj' i ⟶ G.obj' i` induced on `i`th objects by a morphism `F ⟶ G`
in `ComposableArrows C n` when `i` is a natural number such that `i ≤ n`. -/
@[simp]
abbrev app' (φ : F ⟶ G) (i : ℕ) (hi : i ≤ n := by valid) :
F.obj' i ⟶ G.obj' i := φ.app _
@[reassoc]
lemma naturality' (φ : F ⟶ G) (i j : ℕ) (hij : i ≤ j := by valid)
(hj : j ≤ n := by valid) :
F.map' i j ≫ app' φ j = app' φ i ≫ G.map' i j :=
φ.naturality _
/-- Constructor for `ComposableArrows C 0`. -/
@[simps!]
def mk₀ (X : C) : ComposableArrows C 0 := (Functor.const (Fin 1)).obj X
namespace Mk₁
variable (X₀ X₁ : C)
/-- The map which sends `0 : Fin 2` to `X₀` and `1` to `X₁`. -/
@[simp]
def obj : Fin 2 → C
| ⟨0, _⟩ => X₀
| ⟨1, _⟩ => X₁
variable {X₀ X₁}
variable (f : X₀ ⟶ X₁)
/-- The obvious map `obj X₀ X₁ i ⟶ obj X₀ X₁ j` whenever `i j : Fin 2` satisfy `i ≤ j`. -/
@[simp]
def map : ∀ (i j : Fin 2) (_ : i ≤ j), obj X₀ X₁ i ⟶ obj X₀ X₁ j
| ⟨0, _⟩, ⟨0, _⟩, _ => 𝟙 _
| ⟨0, _⟩, ⟨1, _⟩, _ => f
| ⟨1, _⟩, ⟨1, _⟩, _ => 𝟙 _
lemma map_id (i : Fin 2) : map f i i (by simp) = 𝟙 _ :=
match i with
| 0 => rfl
| 1 => rfl
lemma map_comp {i j k : Fin 2} (hij : i ≤ j) (hjk : j ≤ k) :
map f i k (hij.trans hjk) = map f i j hij ≫ map f j k hjk := by
obtain rfl | rfl : i = j ∨ j = k := by omega
· rw [map_id, id_comp]
· rw [map_id, comp_id]
end Mk₁
/-- Constructor for `ComposableArrows C 1`. -/
@[simps]
def mk₁ {X₀ X₁ : C} (f : X₀ ⟶ X₁) : ComposableArrows C 1 where
obj := Mk₁.obj X₀ X₁
map g := Mk₁.map f _ _ (leOfHom g)
map_id := Mk₁.map_id f
map_comp g g' := Mk₁.map_comp f (leOfHom g) (leOfHom g')
/-- Constructor for morphisms `F ⟶ G` in `ComposableArrows C n` which takes as inputs
a family of morphisms `F.obj i ⟶ G.obj i` and the naturality condition only for the
maps in `Fin (n + 1)` given by inequalities of the form `i ≤ i + 1`. -/
@[simps]
def homMk {F G : ComposableArrows C n} (app : ∀ i, F.obj i ⟶ G.obj i)
(w : ∀ (i : ℕ) (hi : i < n), F.map' i (i + 1) ≫ app _ = app _ ≫ G.map' i (i + 1)) :
F ⟶ G where
app := app
naturality := by
suffices ∀ (k i j : ℕ) (hj : i + k = j) (hj' : j ≤ n),
F.map' i j ≫ app _ = app _ ≫ G.map' i j by
rintro ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ hij
have hij' := leOfHom hij
simp only [Fin.mk_le_mk] at hij'
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := Nat.le.dest hij'
exact this k i j hk (by valid)
intro k
induction' k with k hk
· intro i j hj hj'
simp only [add_zero] at hj
obtain rfl := hj
rw [F.map'_self i, G.map'_self i, id_comp, comp_id]
· intro i j hj hj'
rw [← add_assoc] at hj
subst hj
rw [F.map'_comp i (i + k) (i + k + 1), G.map'_comp i (i + k) (i + k + 1), assoc,
w (i + k) (by valid), reassoc_of% (hk i (i + k) rfl (by valid))]
/-- Constructor for isomorphisms `F ≅ G` in `ComposableArrows C n` which takes as inputs
a family of isomorphisms `F.obj i ≅ G.obj i` and the naturality condition only for the
maps in `Fin (n + 1)` given by inequalities of the form `i ≤ i + 1`. -/
@[simps]
def isoMk {F G : ComposableArrows C n} (app : ∀ i, F.obj i ≅ G.obj i)
(w : ∀ (i : ℕ) (hi : i < n),
F.map' i (i + 1) ≫ (app _).hom = (app _).hom ≫ G.map' i (i + 1)) :
F ≅ G where
hom := homMk (fun i => (app i).hom) w
inv := homMk (fun i => (app i).inv) (fun i hi => by
dsimp only
rw [← cancel_epi ((app _).hom), ← reassoc_of% (w i hi), Iso.hom_inv_id, comp_id,
Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc])
lemma ext {F G : ComposableArrows C n} (h : ∀ i, F.obj i = G.obj i)
(w : ∀ (i : ℕ) (hi : i < n), F.map' i (i + 1) =
eqToHom (h _) ≫ G.map' i (i + 1) ≫ eqToHom (h _).symm) : F = G :=
Functor.ext_of_iso
(isoMk (fun i => eqToIso (h i)) (fun i hi => by simp [w i hi])) h (fun _ => rfl)
/-- Constructor for morphisms in `ComposableArrows C 0`. -/
@[simps!]
def homMk₀ {F G : ComposableArrows C 0} (f : F.obj' 0 ⟶ G.obj' 0) : F ⟶ G :=
homMk (fun i => match i with
| ⟨0, _⟩ => f) (fun i hi => by simp at hi)
@[ext]
lemma hom_ext₀ {F G : ComposableArrows C 0} {φ φ' : F ⟶ G}
(h : app' φ 0 = app' φ' 0) :
φ = φ' := by
ext i
fin_cases i
exact h
/-- Constructor for isomorphisms in `ComposableArrows C 0`. -/
@[simps!]
def isoMk₀ {F G : ComposableArrows C 0} (e : F.obj' 0 ≅ G.obj' 0) : F ≅ G where
hom := homMk₀ e.hom
inv := homMk₀ e.inv
lemma ext₀ {F G : ComposableArrows C 0} (h : F.obj' 0 = G.obj 0) : F = G :=
ext (fun i => match i with
| ⟨0, _⟩ => h) (fun i hi => by simp at hi)
lemma mk₀_surjective (F : ComposableArrows C 0) : ∃ (X : C), F = mk₀ X :=
⟨F.obj' 0, ext₀ rfl⟩
/-- Constructor for morphisms in `ComposableArrows C 1`. -/
@[simps!]
def homMk₁ {F G : ComposableArrows C 1}
(left : F.obj' 0 ⟶ G.obj' 0) (right : F.obj' 1 ⟶ G.obj' 1)
(w : F.map' 0 1 ≫ right = left ≫ G.map' 0 1 := by aesop_cat) :
F ⟶ G :=
homMk (fun i => match i with
| ⟨0, _⟩ => left
| ⟨1, _⟩ => right) (by
intro i hi
obtain rfl : i = 0 := by simpa using hi
exact w)
@[ext]
lemma hom_ext₁ {F G : ComposableArrows C 1} {φ φ' : F ⟶ G}
(h₀ : app' φ 0 = app' φ' 0) (h₁ : app' φ 1 = app' φ' 1) :
φ = φ' := by
ext i
match i with
| 0 => exact h₀
| 1 => exact h₁
/-- Constructor for isomorphisms in `ComposableArrows C 1`. -/
@[simps!]
def isoMk₁ {F G : ComposableArrows C 1}
(left : F.obj' 0 ≅ G.obj' 0) (right : F.obj' 1 ≅ G.obj' 1)
(w : F.map' 0 1 ≫ right.hom = left.hom ≫ G.map' 0 1 := by aesop_cat) :
F ≅ G where
hom := homMk₁ left.hom right.hom w
inv := homMk₁ left.inv right.inv (by
rw [← cancel_mono right.hom, assoc, assoc, w, right.inv_hom_id, left.inv_hom_id_assoc]
apply comp_id)
lemma map'_eq_hom₁ (F : ComposableArrows C 1) : F.map' 0 1 = F.hom := rfl
lemma ext₁ {F G : ComposableArrows C 1}
(left : F.left = G.left) (right : F.right = G.right)
(w : F.hom = eqToHom left ≫ G.hom ≫ eqToHom right.symm) : F = G :=
Functor.ext_of_iso (isoMk₁ (eqToIso left) (eqToIso right) (by simp [map'_eq_hom₁, w]))
(fun i => by fin_cases i <;> assumption)
(fun i => by fin_cases i <;> rfl)
lemma mk₁_surjective (X : ComposableArrows C 1) : ∃ (X₀ X₁ : C) (f : X₀ ⟶ X₁), X = mk₁ f :=
⟨_, _, X.map' 0 1, ext₁ rfl rfl (by simp)⟩
variable (F)
namespace Precomp
variable (X : C)
/-- The map `Fin (n + 1 + 1) → C` which "shifts" `F.obj'` to the right and inserts `X` in
the zeroth position. -/
def obj : Fin (n + 1 + 1) → C
| ⟨0, _⟩ => X
| ⟨i + 1, hi⟩ => F.obj' i
@[simp]
lemma obj_zero : obj F X 0 = X := rfl
@[simp]
lemma obj_one : obj F X 1 = F.obj' 0 := rfl
@[simp]
lemma obj_succ (i : ℕ) (hi : i + 1 < n + 1 + 1) : obj F X ⟨i + 1, hi⟩ = F.obj' i := rfl
variable {X} (f : X ⟶ F.left)
/-- Auxiliary definition for the action on maps of the functor `F.precomp f`.
It sends `0 ≤ 1` to `f` and `i + 1 ≤ j + 1` to `F.map' i j`. -/
def map : ∀ (i j : Fin (n + 1 + 1)) (_ : i ≤ j), obj F X i ⟶ obj F X j
| ⟨0, _⟩, ⟨0, _⟩, _ => 𝟙 X
| ⟨0, _⟩, ⟨1, _⟩, _ => f
| ⟨0, _⟩, ⟨j + 2, hj⟩, _ => f ≫ F.map' 0 (j + 1)
| ⟨i + 1, hi⟩, ⟨j + 1, hj⟩, hij => F.map' i j (by simpa using hij)
@[simp]
lemma map_zero_zero : map F f 0 0 (by simp) = 𝟙 X := rfl
@[simp]
lemma map_one_one : map F f 1 1 (by simp) = F.map (𝟙 _) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma map_zero_one : map F f 0 1 (by simp) = f := rfl
@[simp]
lemma map_zero_one' : map F f 0 ⟨0 + 1, by simp⟩ (by simp) = f := rfl
@[simp]
lemma map_zero_succ_succ (j : ℕ) (hj : j + 2 < n + 1 + 1) :
map F f 0 ⟨j + 2, hj⟩ (by simp) = f ≫ F.map' 0 (j+1) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma map_succ_succ (i j : ℕ) (hi : i + 1 < n + 1 + 1) (hj : j + 1 < n + 1 + 1)
(hij : i + 1 ≤ j + 1) :
map F f ⟨i + 1, hi⟩ ⟨j + 1, hj⟩ hij = F.map' i j := rfl
@[simp]
lemma map_one_succ (j : ℕ) (hj : j + 1 < n + 1 + 1) :
map F f 1 ⟨j + 1, hj⟩ (by simp [Fin.le_def]) = F.map' 0 j := rfl
lemma map_id (i : Fin (n + 1 + 1)) : map F f i i (by simp) = 𝟙 _ := by
obtain ⟨_|_, hi⟩ := i <;> simp
lemma map_comp {i j k : Fin (n + 1 + 1)} (hij : i ≤ j) (hjk : j ≤ k) :
map F f i k (hij.trans hjk) = map F f i j hij ≫ map F f j k hjk := by
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := i
obtain ⟨j, hj⟩ := j
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := k
cases i
· obtain _ | _ | j := j
· dsimp
rw [id_comp]
· obtain _ | _ | k := k
· simp [Nat.succ.injEq] at hjk
· simp
· rfl
· obtain _ | _ | k := k
· simp [Fin.ext_iff] at hjk
· simp [Fin.le_def] at hjk
omega
· dsimp
rw [assoc, ← F.map_comp, homOfLE_comp]
· obtain _ | j := j
· simp [Fin.ext_iff] at hij
· obtain _ | k := k
· simp [Fin.ext_iff] at hjk
· dsimp
rw [← F.map_comp, homOfLE_comp]
end Precomp
/-- "Precomposition" of `F : ComposableArrows C n` by a morphism `f : X ⟶ F.left`. -/
@[simps]
def precomp {X : C} (f : X ⟶ F.left) : ComposableArrows C (n + 1) where
obj := Precomp.obj F X
map g := Precomp.map F f _ _ (leOfHom g)
map_id := Precomp.map_id F f
map_comp g g' := Precomp.map_comp F f (leOfHom g) (leOfHom g')
/-- Constructor for `ComposableArrows C 2`. -/
@[simp]
def mk₂ {X₀ X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₀ ⟶ X₁) (g : X₁ ⟶ X₂) : ComposableArrows C 2 :=
(mk₁ g).precomp f
/-- Constructor for `ComposableArrows C 3`. -/
@[simp]
def mk₃ {X₀ X₁ X₂ X₃ : C} (f : X₀ ⟶ X₁) (g : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (h : X₂ ⟶ X₃) : ComposableArrows C 3 :=
(mk₂ g h).precomp f
/-- Constructor for `ComposableArrows C 4`. -/
@[simp]
def mk₄ {X₀ X₁ X₂ X₃ X₄ : C} (f : X₀ ⟶ X₁) (g : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (h : X₂ ⟶ X₃) (i : X₃ ⟶ X₄) :
ComposableArrows C 4 :=
(mk₃ g h i).precomp f
/-- Constructor for `ComposableArrows C 5`. -/
@[simp]
def mk₅ {X₀ X₁ X₂ X₃ X₄ X₅ : C} (f : X₀ ⟶ X₁) (g : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (h : X₂ ⟶ X₃)
(i : X₃ ⟶ X₄) (j : X₄ ⟶ X₅) :
ComposableArrows C 5 :=
(mk₄ g h i j).precomp f
section
variable {X₀ X₁ X₂ X₃ X₄ : C} (f : X₀ ⟶ X₁) (g : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (h : X₂ ⟶ X₃) (i : X₃ ⟶ X₄)
/-! These examples are meant to test the good definitional properties of `precomp`,
and that `dsimp` can see through. -/
example : map' (mk₂ f g) 0 1 = f := by dsimp
example : map' (mk₂ f g) 1 2 = g := by dsimp
example : map' (mk₂ f g) 0 2 = f ≫ g := by dsimp
example : (mk₂ f g).hom = f ≫ g := by dsimp
example : map' (mk₂ f g) 0 0 = 𝟙 _ := by dsimp
example : map' (mk₂ f g) 1 1 = 𝟙 _ := by dsimp
example : map' (mk₂ f g) 2 2 = 𝟙 _ := by dsimp
example : map' (mk₃ f g h) 0 1 = f := by dsimp
example : map' (mk₃ f g h) 1 2 = g := by dsimp
example : map' (mk₃ f g h) 2 3 = h := by dsimp
example : map' (mk₃ f g h) 0 3 = f ≫ g ≫ h := by dsimp
example : (mk₃ f g h).hom = f ≫ g ≫ h := by dsimp
example : map' (mk₃ f g h) 0 2 = f ≫ g := by dsimp
example : map' (mk₃ f g h) 1 3 = g ≫ h := by dsimp
end
/-- The map `ComposableArrows C m → ComposableArrows C n` obtained by precomposition with
a functor `Fin (n + 1) ⥤ Fin (m + 1)`. -/
@[simps!]
def whiskerLeft (F : ComposableArrows C m) (Φ : Fin (n + 1) ⥤ Fin (m + 1)) :
ComposableArrows C n := Φ ⋙ F
/-- The functor `ComposableArrows C m ⥤ ComposableArrows C n` obtained by precomposition with
a functor `Fin (n + 1) ⥤ Fin (m + 1)`. -/
@[simps!]
def whiskerLeftFunctor (Φ : Fin (n + 1) ⥤ Fin (m + 1)) :
ComposableArrows C m ⥤ ComposableArrows C n where
obj F := F.whiskerLeft Φ
map f := CategoryTheory.whiskerLeft Φ f
/-- The functor `Fin n ⥤ Fin (n + 1)` which sends `i` to `i.succ`. -/
@[simps]
def _root_.Fin.succFunctor (n : ℕ) : Fin n ⥤ Fin (n + 1) where
obj i := i.succ
map {_ _} hij := homOfLE (Fin.succ_le_succ_iff.2 (leOfHom hij))
/-- The functor `ComposableArrows C (n + 1) ⥤ ComposableArrows C n` which forgets
the first arrow. -/
@[simps!]
def δ₀Functor : ComposableArrows C (n + 1) ⥤ ComposableArrows C n :=
whiskerLeftFunctor (Fin.succFunctor (n + 1))
/-- The `ComposableArrows C n` obtained by forgetting the first arrow. -/
abbrev δ₀ (F : ComposableArrows C (n + 1)) := δ₀Functor.obj F
@[simp]
lemma precomp_δ₀ {X : C} (f : X ⟶ F.left) : (F.precomp f).δ₀ = F := rfl
/-- The functor `Fin n ⥤ Fin (n + 1)` which sends `i` to `i.castSucc`. -/
@[simps]
def _root_.Fin.castSuccFunctor (n : ℕ) : Fin n ⥤ Fin (n + 1) where
obj i := i.castSucc
map hij := hij
/-- The functor `ComposableArrows C (n + 1) ⥤ ComposableArrows C n` which forgets
the last arrow. -/
@[simps!]
def δlastFunctor : ComposableArrows C (n + 1) ⥤ ComposableArrows C n :=
whiskerLeftFunctor (Fin.castSuccFunctor (n + 1))
/-- The `ComposableArrows C n` obtained by forgetting the first arrow. -/
abbrev δlast (F : ComposableArrows C (n + 1)) := δlastFunctor.obj F
section
variable {F G : ComposableArrows C (n + 1)}
/-- Inductive construction of morphisms in `ComposableArrows C (n + 1)`: in order to construct
a morphism `F ⟶ G`, it suffices to provide `α : F.obj' 0 ⟶ G.obj' 0` and `β : F.δ₀ ⟶ G.δ₀`
such that `F.map' 0 1 ≫ app' β 0 = α ≫ G.map' 0 1`. -/
def homMkSucc (α : F.obj' 0 ⟶ G.obj' 0) (β : F.δ₀ ⟶ G.δ₀)
(w : F.map' 0 1 ≫ app' β 0 = α ≫ G.map' 0 1) : F ⟶ G :=
homMk
(fun i => match i with
| ⟨0, _⟩ => α
| ⟨i + 1, hi⟩ => app' β i)
(fun i hi => by
obtain _ | i := i
· exact w
· exact naturality' β i (i + 1))
variable (α : F.obj' 0 ⟶ G.obj' 0) (β : F.δ₀ ⟶ G.δ₀)
(w : F.map' 0 1 ≫ app' β 0 = α ≫ G.map' 0 1)
@[simp]
lemma homMkSucc_app_zero : (homMkSucc α β w).app 0 = α := rfl
@[simp]
lemma homMkSucc_app_succ (i : ℕ) (hi : i + 1 < n + 1 + 1) :
(homMkSucc α β w).app ⟨i + 1, hi⟩ = app' β i := rfl
end
lemma hom_ext_succ {F G : ComposableArrows C (n + 1)} {f g : F ⟶ G}
(h₀ : app' f 0 = app' g 0) (h₁ : δ₀Functor.map f = δ₀Functor.map g) : f = g := by
ext ⟨i, hi⟩
obtain _ | i := i
· exact h₀
· exact congr_app h₁ ⟨i, by valid⟩
/-- Inductive construction of isomorphisms in `ComposableArrows C (n + 1)`: in order to
construct an isomorphism `F ≅ G`, it suffices to provide `α : F.obj' 0 ≅ G.obj' 0` and
`β : F.δ₀ ≅ G.δ₀` such that `F.map' 0 1 ≫ app' β.hom 0 = α.hom ≫ G.map' 0 1`. -/
@[simps]
def isoMkSucc {F G : ComposableArrows C (n + 1)} (α : F.obj' 0 ≅ G.obj' 0)
(β : F.δ₀ ≅ G.δ₀) (w : F.map' 0 1 ≫ app' β.hom 0 = α.hom ≫ G.map' 0 1) : F ≅ G where
hom := homMkSucc α.hom β.hom w
inv := homMkSucc α.inv β.inv (by
rw [← cancel_epi α.hom, ← reassoc_of% w, α.hom_inv_id_assoc, β.hom_inv_id_app]
dsimp
rw [comp_id])
hom_inv_id := by
apply hom_ext_succ
· simp
· ext ⟨i, hi⟩
simp
inv_hom_id := by
apply hom_ext_succ
· simp
· ext ⟨i, hi⟩
simp
lemma ext_succ {F G : ComposableArrows C (n + 1)} (h₀ : F.obj' 0 = G.obj' 0)
(h : F.δ₀ = G.δ₀) (w : F.map' 0 1 = eqToHom h₀ ≫ G.map' 0 1 ≫
eqToHom (Functor.congr_obj h.symm 0)) : F = G := by
have : ∀ i, F.obj i = G.obj i := by
intro ⟨i, hi⟩
rcases i with - | i
· exact h₀
· exact Functor.congr_obj h ⟨i, by valid⟩
exact Functor.ext_of_iso (isoMkSucc (eqToIso h₀) (eqToIso h) (by
rw [w]
dsimp [app']
rw [eqToHom_app, assoc, assoc, eqToHom_trans, eqToHom_refl, comp_id])) this
(by rintro ⟨_|_, hi⟩ <;> simp)
lemma precomp_surjective (F : ComposableArrows C (n + 1)) :
∃ (F₀ : ComposableArrows C n) (X₀ : C) (f₀ : X₀ ⟶ F₀.left), F = F₀.precomp f₀ :=
⟨F.δ₀, _, F.map' 0 1, ext_succ rfl (by simp) (by simp)⟩
section
variable
{f g : ComposableArrows C 2}
(app₀ : f.obj' 0 ⟶ g.obj' 0) (app₁ : f.obj' 1 ⟶ g.obj' 1) (app₂ : f.obj' 2 ⟶ g.obj' 2)
(w₀ : f.map' 0 1 ≫ app₁ = app₀ ≫ g.map' 0 1)
(w₁ : f.map' 1 2 ≫ app₂ = app₁ ≫ g.map' 1 2)
/-- Constructor for morphisms in `ComposableArrows C 2`. -/
def homMk₂ : f ⟶ g := homMkSucc app₀ (homMk₁ app₁ app₂ w₁) w₀
@[simp]
lemma homMk₂_app_zero : (homMk₂ app₀ app₁ app₂ w₀ w₁).app 0 = app₀ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma homMk₂_app_one : (homMk₂ app₀ app₁ app₂ w₀ w₁).app 1 = app₁ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma homMk₂_app_two : (homMk₂ app₀ app₁ app₂ w₀ w₁).app ⟨2, by valid⟩ = app₂ := rfl
end
@[ext]
lemma hom_ext₂ {f g : ComposableArrows C 2} {φ φ' : f ⟶ g}
(h₀ : app' φ 0 = app' φ' 0) (h₁ : app' φ 1 = app' φ' 1) (h₂ : app' φ 2 = app' φ' 2) :
φ = φ' :=
hom_ext_succ h₀ (hom_ext₁ h₁ h₂)
/-- Constructor for isomorphisms in `ComposableArrows C 2`. -/
@[simps]
def isoMk₂ {f g : ComposableArrows C 2}
(app₀ : f.obj' 0 ≅ g.obj' 0) (app₁ : f.obj' 1 ≅ g.obj' 1) (app₂ : f.obj' 2 ≅ g.obj' 2)
(w₀ : f.map' 0 1 ≫ app₁.hom = app₀.hom ≫ g.map' 0 1)
(w₁ : f.map' 1 2 ≫ app₂.hom = app₁.hom ≫ g.map' 1 2) : f ≅ g where
hom := homMk₂ app₀.hom app₁.hom app₂.hom w₀ w₁
inv := homMk₂ app₀.inv app₁.inv app₂.inv
(by rw [← cancel_epi app₀.hom, ← reassoc_of% w₀, app₁.hom_inv_id,
comp_id, app₀.hom_inv_id_assoc])
(by rw [← cancel_epi app₁.hom, ← reassoc_of% w₁, app₂.hom_inv_id,
comp_id, app₁.hom_inv_id_assoc])
lemma ext₂ {f g : ComposableArrows C 2}
(h₀ : f.obj' 0 = g.obj' 0) (h₁ : f.obj' 1 = g.obj' 1) (h₂ : f.obj' 2 = g.obj' 2)
(w₀ : f.map' 0 1 = eqToHom h₀ ≫ g.map' 0 1 ≫ eqToHom h₁.symm)
(w₁ : f.map' 1 2 = eqToHom h₁ ≫ g.map' 1 2 ≫ eqToHom h₂.symm) : f = g :=
ext_succ h₀ (ext₁ h₁ h₂ w₁) w₀
lemma mk₂_surjective (X : ComposableArrows C 2) :
∃ (X₀ X₁ X₂ : C) (f₀ : X₀ ⟶ X₁) (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ X₂), X = mk₂ f₀ f₁ :=
⟨_, _, _, X.map' 0 1, X.map' 1 2, ext₂ rfl rfl rfl (by simp) (by simp)⟩
section
variable
{f g : ComposableArrows C 3}
(app₀ : f.obj' 0 ⟶ g.obj' 0) (app₁ : f.obj' 1 ⟶ g.obj' 1) (app₂ : f.obj' 2 ⟶ g.obj' 2)
(app₃ : f.obj' 3 ⟶ g.obj' 3)
(w₀ : f.map' 0 1 ≫ app₁ = app₀ ≫ g.map' 0 1)
(w₁ : f.map' 1 2 ≫ app₂ = app₁ ≫ g.map' 1 2)
(w₂ : f.map' 2 3 ≫ app₃ = app₂ ≫ g.map' 2 3)
/-- Constructor for morphisms in `ComposableArrows C 3`. -/
def homMk₃ : f ⟶ g := homMkSucc app₀ (homMk₂ app₁ app₂ app₃ w₁ w₂) w₀
@[simp]
lemma homMk₃_app_zero : (homMk₃ app₀ app₁ app₂ app₃ w₀ w₁ w₂).app 0 = app₀ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma homMk₃_app_one : (homMk₃ app₀ app₁ app₂ app₃ w₀ w₁ w₂).app 1 = app₁ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma homMk₃_app_two : (homMk₃ app₀ app₁ app₂ app₃ w₀ w₁ w₂).app ⟨2, by valid⟩ = app₂ :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma homMk₃_app_three : (homMk₃ app₀ app₁ app₂ app₃ w₀ w₁ w₂).app ⟨3, by valid⟩ = app₃ :=
rfl
end
@[ext]
lemma hom_ext₃ {f g : ComposableArrows C 3} {φ φ' : f ⟶ g}
(h₀ : app' φ 0 = app' φ' 0) (h₁ : app' φ 1 = app' φ' 1) (h₂ : app' φ 2 = app' φ' 2)
(h₃ : app' φ 3 = app' φ' 3) :
φ = φ' :=
hom_ext_succ h₀ (hom_ext₂ h₁ h₂ h₃)
/-- Constructor for isomorphisms in `ComposableArrows C 3`. -/
@[simps]
def isoMk₃ {f g : ComposableArrows C 3}
(app₀ : f.obj' 0 ≅ g.obj' 0) (app₁ : f.obj' 1 ≅ g.obj' 1) (app₂ : f.obj' 2 ≅ g.obj' 2)
(app₃ : f.obj' 3 ≅ g.obj' 3)
(w₀ : f.map' 0 1 ≫ app₁.hom = app₀.hom ≫ g.map' 0 1)
(w₁ : f.map' 1 2 ≫ app₂.hom = app₁.hom ≫ g.map' 1 2)
(w₂ : f.map' 2 3 ≫ app₃.hom = app₂.hom ≫ g.map' 2 3) : f ≅ g where
hom := homMk₃ app₀.hom app₁.hom app₂.hom app₃.hom w₀ w₁ w₂
inv := homMk₃ app₀.inv app₁.inv app₂.inv app₃.inv
(by rw [← cancel_epi app₀.hom, ← reassoc_of% w₀, app₁.hom_inv_id,
comp_id, app₀.hom_inv_id_assoc])
(by rw [← cancel_epi app₁.hom, ← reassoc_of% w₁, app₂.hom_inv_id,
comp_id, app₁.hom_inv_id_assoc])
(by rw [← cancel_epi app₂.hom, ← reassoc_of% w₂, app₃.hom_inv_id,
comp_id, app₂.hom_inv_id_assoc])
lemma ext₃ {f g : ComposableArrows C 3}
(h₀ : f.obj' 0 = g.obj' 0) (h₁ : f.obj' 1 = g.obj' 1) (h₂ : f.obj' 2 = g.obj' 2)
(h₃ : f.obj' 3 = g.obj' 3)
(w₀ : f.map' 0 1 = eqToHom h₀ ≫ g.map' 0 1 ≫ eqToHom h₁.symm)
(w₁ : f.map' 1 2 = eqToHom h₁ ≫ g.map' 1 2 ≫ eqToHom h₂.symm)
(w₂ : f.map' 2 3 = eqToHom h₂ ≫ g.map' 2 3 ≫ eqToHom h₃.symm) : f = g :=
ext_succ h₀ (ext₂ h₁ h₂ h₃ w₁ w₂) w₀
lemma mk₃_surjective (X : ComposableArrows C 3) :
∃ (X₀ X₁ X₂ X₃ : C) (f₀ : X₀ ⟶ X₁) (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ X₃), X = mk₃ f₀ f₁ f₂ :=
⟨_, _, _, _, X.map' 0 1, X.map' 1 2, X.map' 2 3,
ext₃ rfl rfl rfl rfl (by simp) (by simp) (by simp)⟩
section
variable
{f g : ComposableArrows C 4}
(app₀ : f.obj' 0 ⟶ g.obj' 0) (app₁ : f.obj' 1 ⟶ g.obj' 1) (app₂ : f.obj' 2 ⟶ g.obj' 2)
(app₃ : f.obj' 3 ⟶ g.obj' 3) (app₄ : f.obj' 4 ⟶ g.obj' 4)
(w₀ : f.map' 0 1 ≫ app₁ = app₀ ≫ g.map' 0 1)
(w₁ : f.map' 1 2 ≫ app₂ = app₁ ≫ g.map' 1 2)
(w₂ : f.map' 2 3 ≫ app₃ = app₂ ≫ g.map' 2 3)
(w₃ : f.map' 3 4 ≫ app₄ = app₃ ≫ g.map' 3 4)
/-- Constructor for morphisms in `ComposableArrows C 4`. -/
def homMk₄ : f ⟶ g := homMkSucc app₀ (homMk₃ app₁ app₂ app₃ app₄ w₁ w₂ w₃) w₀
@[simp]
lemma homMk₄_app_zero : (homMk₄ app₀ app₁ app₂ app₃ app₄ w₀ w₁ w₂ w₃).app 0 = app₀ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma homMk₄_app_one : (homMk₄ app₀ app₁ app₂ app₃ app₄ w₀ w₁ w₂ w₃).app 1 = app₁ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma homMk₄_app_two :
(homMk₄ app₀ app₁ app₂ app₃ app₄ w₀ w₁ w₂ w₃).app ⟨2, by valid⟩ = app₂ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma homMk₄_app_three :
(homMk₄ app₀ app₁ app₂ app₃ app₄ w₀ w₁ w₂ w₃).app ⟨3, by valid⟩ = app₃ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma homMk₄_app_four :
(homMk₄ app₀ app₁ app₂ app₃ app₄ w₀ w₁ w₂ w₃).app ⟨4, by valid⟩ = app₄ := rfl
end
@[ext]
lemma hom_ext₄ {f g : ComposableArrows C 4} {φ φ' : f ⟶ g}
(h₀ : app' φ 0 = app' φ' 0) (h₁ : app' φ 1 = app' φ' 1) (h₂ : app' φ 2 = app' φ' 2)
(h₃ : app' φ 3 = app' φ' 3) (h₄ : app' φ 4 = app' φ' 4) :
φ = φ' :=
hom_ext_succ h₀ (hom_ext₃ h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄)
lemma map'_inv_eq_inv_map' {n m : ℕ} (h : n+1 ≤ m) {f g : ComposableArrows C m}
(app : f.obj' n ≅ g.obj' n) (app' : f.obj' (n+1) ≅ g.obj' (n+1))
(w : f.map' n (n+1) ≫ app'.hom = app.hom ≫ g.map' n (n+1)) :
map' g n (n+1) ≫ app'.inv = app.inv ≫ map' f n (n+1) := by
rw [← cancel_epi app.hom, ← reassoc_of% w, app'.hom_inv_id, comp_id, app.hom_inv_id_assoc]
/-- Constructor for isomorphisms in `ComposableArrows C 4`. -/
@[simps]
def isoMk₄ {f g : ComposableArrows C 4}
(app₀ : f.obj' 0 ≅ g.obj' 0) (app₁ : f.obj' 1 ≅ g.obj' 1) (app₂ : f.obj' 2 ≅ g.obj' 2)
(app₃ : f.obj' 3 ≅ g.obj' 3) (app₄ : f.obj' 4 ≅ g.obj' 4)
(w₀ : f.map' 0 1 ≫ app₁.hom = app₀.hom ≫ g.map' 0 1)
(w₁ : f.map' 1 2 ≫ app₂.hom = app₁.hom ≫ g.map' 1 2)
(w₂ : f.map' 2 3 ≫ app₃.hom = app₂.hom ≫ g.map' 2 3)
(w₃ : f.map' 3 4 ≫ app₄.hom = app₃.hom ≫ g.map' 3 4) :
f ≅ g where
hom := homMk₄ app₀.hom app₁.hom app₂.hom app₃.hom app₄.hom w₀ w₁ w₂ w₃
inv := homMk₄ app₀.inv app₁.inv app₂.inv app₃.inv app₄.inv
(by rw [map'_inv_eq_inv_map' (by valid) app₀ app₁ w₀])
(by rw [map'_inv_eq_inv_map' (by valid) app₁ app₂ w₁])
(by rw [map'_inv_eq_inv_map' (by valid) app₂ app₃ w₂])
(by rw [map'_inv_eq_inv_map' (by valid) app₃ app₄ w₃])
lemma ext₄ {f g : ComposableArrows C 4}
(h₀ : f.obj' 0 = g.obj' 0) (h₁ : f.obj' 1 = g.obj' 1) (h₂ : f.obj' 2 = g.obj' 2)
(h₃ : f.obj' 3 = g.obj' 3) (h₄ : f.obj' 4 = g.obj' 4)
(w₀ : f.map' 0 1 = eqToHom h₀ ≫ g.map' 0 1 ≫ eqToHom h₁.symm)
(w₁ : f.map' 1 2 = eqToHom h₁ ≫ g.map' 1 2 ≫ eqToHom h₂.symm)
(w₂ : f.map' 2 3 = eqToHom h₂ ≫ g.map' 2 3 ≫ eqToHom h₃.symm)
(w₃ : f.map' 3 4 = eqToHom h₃ ≫ g.map' 3 4 ≫ eqToHom h₄.symm) :
f = g :=
ext_succ h₀ (ext₃ h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ w₁ w₂ w₃) w₀
lemma mk₄_surjective (X : ComposableArrows C 4) :
∃ (X₀ X₁ X₂ X₃ X₄ : C) (f₀ : X₀ ⟶ X₁) (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ X₃) (f₃ : X₃ ⟶ X₄),
X = mk₄ f₀ f₁ f₂ f₃ :=
⟨_, _, _, _, _, X.map' 0 1, X.map' 1 2, X.map' 2 3, X.map' 3 4,
ext₄ rfl rfl rfl rfl rfl (by simp) (by simp) (by simp) (by simp)⟩
section
variable
{f g : ComposableArrows C 5}
(app₀ : f.obj' 0 ⟶ g.obj' 0) (app₁ : f.obj' 1 ⟶ g.obj' 1) (app₂ : f.obj' 2 ⟶ g.obj' 2)
(app₃ : f.obj' 3 ⟶ g.obj' 3) (app₄ : f.obj' 4 ⟶ g.obj' 4) (app₅ : f.obj' 5 ⟶ g.obj' 5)
(w₀ : f.map' 0 1 ≫ app₁ = app₀ ≫ g.map' 0 1)
(w₁ : f.map' 1 2 ≫ app₂ = app₁ ≫ g.map' 1 2)
(w₂ : f.map' 2 3 ≫ app₃ = app₂ ≫ g.map' 2 3)
(w₃ : f.map' 3 4 ≫ app₄ = app₃ ≫ g.map' 3 4)
(w₄ : f.map' 4 5 ≫ app₅ = app₄ ≫ g.map' 4 5)
/-- Constructor for morphisms in `ComposableArrows C 5`. -/
def homMk₅ : f ⟶ g := homMkSucc app₀ (homMk₄ app₁ app₂ app₃ app₄ app₅ w₁ w₂ w₃ w₄) w₀
@[simp]
lemma homMk₅_app_zero : (homMk₅ app₀ app₁ app₂ app₃ app₄ app₅ w₀ w₁ w₂ w₃ w₄).app 0 = app₀ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma homMk₅_app_one : (homMk₅ app₀ app₁ app₂ app₃ app₄ app₅ w₀ w₁ w₂ w₃ w₄).app 1 = app₁ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma homMk₅_app_two :
(homMk₅ app₀ app₁ app₂ app₃ app₄ app₅ w₀ w₁ w₂ w₃ w₄).app ⟨2, by valid⟩ = app₂ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma homMk₅_app_three :
(homMk₅ app₀ app₁ app₂ app₃ app₄ app₅ w₀ w₁ w₂ w₃ w₄).app ⟨3, by valid⟩ = app₃ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma homMk₅_app_four :
(homMk₅ app₀ app₁ app₂ app₃ app₄ app₅ w₀ w₁ w₂ w₃ w₄).app ⟨4, by valid⟩ = app₄ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma homMk₅_app_five :
(homMk₅ app₀ app₁ app₂ app₃ app₄ app₅ w₀ w₁ w₂ w₃ w₄).app ⟨5, by valid⟩ = app₅ := rfl
end
@[ext]
lemma hom_ext₅ {f g : ComposableArrows C 5} {φ φ' : f ⟶ g}
(h₀ : app' φ 0 = app' φ' 0) (h₁ : app' φ 1 = app' φ' 1) (h₂ : app' φ 2 = app' φ' 2)
(h₃ : app' φ 3 = app' φ' 3) (h₄ : app' φ 4 = app' φ' 4) (h₅ : app' φ 5 = app' φ' 5) :
φ = φ' :=
hom_ext_succ h₀ (hom_ext₄ h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅)
|
/-- Constructor for isomorphisms in `ComposableArrows C 5`. -/
@[simps]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/ComposableArrows.lean | 792 | 794 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.BernoulliPolynomials
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Polynomial
import Mathlib.Analysis.Fourier.AddCircle
import Mathlib.Analysis.PSeries
/-!
# Critical values of the Riemann zeta function
In this file we prove formulae for the critical values of `ζ(s)`, and more generally of Hurwitz
zeta functions, in terms of Bernoulli polynomials.
## Main results:
* `hasSum_zeta_nat`: the final formula for zeta values,
$$\zeta(2k) = \frac{(-1)^{(k + 1)} 2 ^ {2k - 1} \pi^{2k} B_{2 k}}{(2 k)!}.$$
* `hasSum_zeta_two` and `hasSum_zeta_four`: special cases given explicitly.
* `hasSum_one_div_nat_pow_mul_cos`: a formula for the sum `∑ (n : ℕ), cos (2 π i n x) / n ^ k` as
an explicit multiple of `Bₖ(x)`, for any `x ∈ [0, 1]` and `k ≥ 2` even.
* `hasSum_one_div_nat_pow_mul_sin`: a formula for the sum `∑ (n : ℕ), sin (2 π i n x) / n ^ k` as
an explicit multiple of `Bₖ(x)`, for any `x ∈ [0, 1]` and `k ≥ 3` odd.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Nat Real Interval
open Complex MeasureTheory Set intervalIntegral
local notation "𝕌" => UnitAddCircle
section BernoulliFunProps
/-! Simple properties of the Bernoulli polynomial, as a function `ℝ → ℝ`. -/
/-- The function `x ↦ Bₖ(x) : ℝ → ℝ`. -/
def bernoulliFun (k : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(Polynomial.map (algebraMap ℚ ℝ) (Polynomial.bernoulli k)).eval x
theorem bernoulliFun_eval_zero (k : ℕ) : bernoulliFun k 0 = bernoulli k := by
rw [bernoulliFun, Polynomial.eval_zero_map, Polynomial.bernoulli_eval_zero, eq_ratCast]
theorem bernoulliFun_endpoints_eq_of_ne_one {k : ℕ} (hk : k ≠ 1) :
bernoulliFun k 1 = bernoulliFun k 0 := by
rw [bernoulliFun_eval_zero, bernoulliFun, Polynomial.eval_one_map, Polynomial.bernoulli_eval_one,
bernoulli_eq_bernoulli'_of_ne_one hk, eq_ratCast]
theorem bernoulliFun_eval_one (k : ℕ) : bernoulliFun k 1 = bernoulliFun k 0 + ite (k = 1) 1 0 := by
rw [bernoulliFun, bernoulliFun_eval_zero, Polynomial.eval_one_map, Polynomial.bernoulli_eval_one]
split_ifs with h
· rw [h, bernoulli_one, bernoulli'_one, eq_ratCast]
push_cast; ring
· rw [bernoulli_eq_bernoulli'_of_ne_one h, add_zero, eq_ratCast]
theorem hasDerivAt_bernoulliFun (k : ℕ) (x : ℝ) :
HasDerivAt (bernoulliFun k) (k * bernoulliFun (k - 1) x) x := by
convert ((Polynomial.bernoulli k).map <| algebraMap ℚ ℝ).hasDerivAt x using 1
simp only [bernoulliFun, Polynomial.derivative_map, Polynomial.derivative_bernoulli k,
Polynomial.map_mul, Polynomial.map_natCast, Polynomial.eval_mul, Polynomial.eval_natCast]
theorem antideriv_bernoulliFun (k : ℕ) (x : ℝ) :
HasDerivAt (fun x => bernoulliFun (k + 1) x / (k + 1)) (bernoulliFun k x) x := by
convert (hasDerivAt_bernoulliFun (k + 1) x).div_const _ using 1
field_simp [Nat.cast_add_one_ne_zero k]
theorem integral_bernoulliFun_eq_zero {k : ℕ} (hk : k ≠ 0) :
∫ x : ℝ in (0)..1, bernoulliFun k x = 0 := by
rw [integral_eq_sub_of_hasDerivAt (fun x _ => antideriv_bernoulliFun k x)
((Polynomial.continuous _).intervalIntegrable _ _)]
rw [bernoulliFun_eval_one]
split_ifs with h
· exfalso; exact hk (Nat.succ_inj.mp h)
· simp
end BernoulliFunProps
section BernoulliFourierCoeffs
/-! Compute the Fourier coefficients of the Bernoulli functions via integration by parts. -/
/-- The `n`-th Fourier coefficient of the `k`-th Bernoulli function on the interval `[0, 1]`. -/
def bernoulliFourierCoeff (k : ℕ) (n : ℤ) : ℂ :=
fourierCoeffOn zero_lt_one (fun x => bernoulliFun k x) n
/-- Recurrence relation (in `k`) for the `n`-th Fourier coefficient of `Bₖ`. -/
theorem bernoulliFourierCoeff_recurrence (k : ℕ) {n : ℤ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
bernoulliFourierCoeff k n =
1 / (-2 * π * I * n) * (ite (k = 1) 1 0 - k * bernoulliFourierCoeff (k - 1) n) := by
unfold bernoulliFourierCoeff
rw [fourierCoeffOn_of_hasDerivAt zero_lt_one hn
(fun x _ => (hasDerivAt_bernoulliFun k x).ofReal_comp)
((continuous_ofReal.comp <|
continuous_const.mul <| Polynomial.continuous _).intervalIntegrable
_ _)]
simp_rw [ofReal_one, ofReal_zero, sub_zero, one_mul]
rw [QuotientAddGroup.mk_zero, fourier_eval_zero, one_mul, ← ofReal_sub, bernoulliFun_eval_one,
add_sub_cancel_left]
congr 2
· split_ifs <;> simp only [ofReal_one, ofReal_zero, one_mul]
· simp_rw [ofReal_mul, ofReal_natCast, fourierCoeffOn.const_mul]
/-- The Fourier coefficients of `B₀(x) = 1`. -/
theorem bernoulli_zero_fourier_coeff {n : ℤ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : bernoulliFourierCoeff 0 n = 0 := by
simpa using bernoulliFourierCoeff_recurrence 0 hn
/-- The `0`-th Fourier coefficient of `Bₖ(x)`. -/
theorem bernoulliFourierCoeff_zero {k : ℕ} (hk : k ≠ 0) : bernoulliFourierCoeff k 0 = 0 := by
simp_rw [bernoulliFourierCoeff, fourierCoeffOn_eq_integral, neg_zero, fourier_zero, sub_zero,
div_one, one_smul, intervalIntegral.integral_ofReal, integral_bernoulliFun_eq_zero hk,
ofReal_zero]
theorem bernoulliFourierCoeff_eq {k : ℕ} (hk : k ≠ 0) (n : ℤ) :
bernoulliFourierCoeff k n = -k ! / (2 * π * I * n) ^ k := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· rw [bernoulliFourierCoeff_zero hk, Int.cast_zero, mul_zero, zero_pow hk,
div_zero]
refine Nat.le_induction ?_ (fun k hk h'k => ?_) k (Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.mpr hk)
· rw [bernoulliFourierCoeff_recurrence 1 hn]
simp only [Nat.cast_one, tsub_self, neg_mul, one_mul, eq_self_iff_true, if_true,
Nat.factorial_one, pow_one, inv_I, mul_neg]
rw [bernoulli_zero_fourier_coeff hn, sub_zero, mul_one, div_neg, neg_div]
· rw [bernoulliFourierCoeff_recurrence (k + 1) hn, Nat.add_sub_cancel k 1]
split_ifs with h
· exfalso; exact (ne_of_gt (Nat.lt_succ_iff.mpr hk)) h
· rw [h'k, Nat.factorial_succ, zero_sub, Nat.cast_mul, pow_add, pow_one, neg_div, mul_neg,
mul_neg, mul_neg, neg_neg, neg_mul, neg_mul, neg_mul, div_neg]
field_simp [Int.cast_ne_zero.mpr hn, I_ne_zero]
ring_nf
end BernoulliFourierCoeffs
section BernoulliPeriodized
/-! In this section we use the above evaluations of the Fourier coefficients of Bernoulli
polynomials, together with the theorem `has_pointwise_sum_fourier_series_of_summable` from Fourier
theory, to obtain an explicit formula for `∑ (n:ℤ), 1 / n ^ k * fourier n x`. -/
/-- The Bernoulli polynomial, extended from `[0, 1)` to the unit circle. -/
def periodizedBernoulli (k : ℕ) : 𝕌 → ℝ :=
AddCircle.liftIco 1 0 (bernoulliFun k)
theorem periodizedBernoulli.continuous {k : ℕ} (hk : k ≠ 1) : Continuous (periodizedBernoulli k) :=
AddCircle.liftIco_zero_continuous
(mod_cast (bernoulliFun_endpoints_eq_of_ne_one hk).symm)
(Polynomial.continuous _).continuousOn
theorem fourierCoeff_bernoulli_eq {k : ℕ} (hk : k ≠ 0) (n : ℤ) :
fourierCoeff ((↑) ∘ periodizedBernoulli k : 𝕌 → ℂ) n = -k ! / (2 * π * I * n) ^ k := by
have : ((↑) ∘ periodizedBernoulli k : 𝕌 → ℂ) = AddCircle.liftIco 1 0 ((↑) ∘ bernoulliFun k) := by
ext1 x; rfl
rw [this, fourierCoeff_liftIco_eq]
simpa only [zero_add] using bernoulliFourierCoeff_eq hk n
theorem summable_bernoulli_fourier {k : ℕ} (hk : 2 ≤ k) :
Summable (fun n => -k ! / (2 * π * I * n) ^ k : ℤ → ℂ) := by
have :
∀ n : ℤ, -(k ! : ℂ) / (2 * π * I * n) ^ k = -k ! / (2 * π * I) ^ k * (1 / (n : ℂ) ^ k) := by
intro n; rw [mul_one_div, div_div, ← mul_pow]
simp_rw [this]
refine Summable.mul_left _ <| .of_norm ?_
have : (fun x : ℤ => ‖1 / (x : ℂ) ^ k‖) = fun x : ℤ => |1 / (x : ℝ) ^ k| := by
ext1 x
simp only [one_div, norm_inv, norm_pow, norm_intCast, pow_abs, abs_inv]
simp_rw [this]
rwa [summable_abs_iff, Real.summable_one_div_int_pow]
theorem hasSum_one_div_pow_mul_fourier_mul_bernoulliFun {k : ℕ} (hk : 2 ≤ k) {x : ℝ}
(hx : x ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1) :
HasSum (fun n : ℤ => 1 / (n : ℂ) ^ k * fourier n (x : 𝕌))
(-(2 * π * I) ^ k / k ! * bernoulliFun k x) := by
-- first show it suffices to prove result for `Ico 0 1`
suffices ∀ {y : ℝ}, y ∈ Ico (0 : ℝ) 1 →
HasSum (fun (n : ℤ) ↦ 1 / (n : ℂ) ^ k * fourier n y)
(-(2 * (π : ℂ) * I) ^ k / k ! * bernoulliFun k y) by
rw [← Ico_insert_right (zero_le_one' ℝ), mem_insert_iff, or_comm] at hx
rcases hx with (hx | rfl)
· exact this hx
· convert this (left_mem_Ico.mpr zero_lt_one) using 1
· rw [AddCircle.coe_period, QuotientAddGroup.mk_zero]
· rw [bernoulliFun_endpoints_eq_of_ne_one (by omega : k ≠ 1)]
intro y hy
let B : C(𝕌, ℂ) :=
ContinuousMap.mk ((↑) ∘ periodizedBernoulli k)
(continuous_ofReal.comp (periodizedBernoulli.continuous (by omega)))
have step1 : ∀ n : ℤ, fourierCoeff B n = -k ! / (2 * π * I * n) ^ k := by
rw [ContinuousMap.coe_mk]; exact fourierCoeff_bernoulli_eq (by omega : k ≠ 0)
have step2 :=
has_pointwise_sum_fourier_series_of_summable
((summable_bernoulli_fourier hk).congr fun n => (step1 n).symm) y
simp_rw [step1] at step2
convert step2.mul_left (-(2 * ↑π * I) ^ k / (k ! : ℂ)) using 2 with n
· rw [smul_eq_mul, ← mul_assoc, mul_div, mul_neg, div_mul_cancel₀, neg_neg, mul_pow _ (n : ℂ),
← div_div, div_self]
· rw [Ne, pow_eq_zero_iff', not_and_or]
exact Or.inl two_pi_I_ne_zero
· exact Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr (Nat.factorial_ne_zero _)
· rw [ContinuousMap.coe_mk, Function.comp_apply, ofReal_inj, periodizedBernoulli,
AddCircle.liftIco_coe_apply (show y ∈ Ico 0 (0 + 1) by rwa [zero_add])]
end BernoulliPeriodized
section Cleanup
-- This section is just reformulating the results in a nicer form.
theorem hasSum_one_div_nat_pow_mul_fourier {k : ℕ} (hk : 2 ≤ k) {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1) :
HasSum
(fun n : ℕ =>
(1 : ℂ) / (n : ℂ) ^ k * (fourier n (x : 𝕌) + (-1 : ℂ) ^ k * fourier (-n) (x : 𝕌)))
(-(2 * π * I) ^ k / k ! * bernoulliFun k x) := by
convert (hasSum_one_div_pow_mul_fourier_mul_bernoulliFun hk hx).nat_add_neg using 1
· ext1 n
rw [Int.cast_neg, mul_add, ← mul_assoc]
conv_rhs => rw [neg_eq_neg_one_mul, mul_pow, ← div_div]
congr 2
rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div₀, one_mul]
congr 1
rw [eq_div_iff, ← mul_pow, ← neg_eq_neg_one_mul, neg_neg, one_pow]
apply pow_ne_zero; rw [neg_ne_zero]; exact one_ne_zero
· rw [Int.cast_zero, zero_pow (by positivity : k ≠ 0), div_zero, zero_mul, add_zero]
theorem hasSum_one_div_nat_pow_mul_cos {k : ℕ} (hk : k ≠ 0) {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1) :
HasSum (fun n : ℕ => 1 / (n : ℝ) ^ (2 * k) * Real.cos (2 * π * n * x))
((-1 : ℝ) ^ (k + 1) * (2 * π) ^ (2 * k) / 2 / (2 * k)! *
(Polynomial.map (algebraMap ℚ ℝ) (Polynomial.bernoulli (2 * k))).eval x) := by
have :
| HasSum (fun n : ℕ => 1 / (n : ℂ) ^ (2 * k) * (fourier n (x : 𝕌) + fourier (-n) (x : 𝕌)))
((-1 : ℂ) ^ (k + 1) * (2 * (π : ℂ)) ^ (2 * k) / (2 * k)! * bernoulliFun (2 * k) x) := by
convert
hasSum_one_div_nat_pow_mul_fourier (by omega : 2 ≤ 2 * k)
hx using 3
· rw [pow_mul (-1 : ℂ), neg_one_sq, one_pow, one_mul]
· rw [pow_add, pow_one]
conv_rhs =>
rw [mul_pow]
congr
congr
· skip
· rw [pow_mul, I_sq]
ring
have ofReal_two : ((2 : ℝ) : ℂ) = 2 := by norm_cast
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/ZetaValues.lean | 234 | 248 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yaël Dillies, Vladimir Ivanov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Vladimir Ivanov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Intervals
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sups
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Powerset
/-!
# The Ahlswede-Zhang identity
This file proves the Ahlswede-Zhang identity, which is a nontrivial relation between the size of the
"truncated unions" of a set family. It sharpens the Lubell-Yamamoto-Meshalkin inequality
`Finset.lubell_yamamoto_meshalkin_inequality_sum_card_div_choose`, by making explicit the correction
term.
For a set family `𝒜` over a ground set of size `n`, the Ahlswede-Zhang identity states that the sum
of `|⋂ B ∈ 𝒜, B ⊆ A, B|/(|A| * n.choose |A|)` over all set `A` is exactly `1`. This implies the LYM
inequality since for an antichain `𝒜` and every `A ∈ 𝒜` we have
`|⋂ B ∈ 𝒜, B ⊆ A, B|/(|A| * n.choose |A|) = 1 / n.choose |A|`.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.truncatedSup`: `s.truncatedSup a` is the supremum of all `b ≥ a` in `𝒜` if there are
some, or `⊤` if there are none.
* `Finset.truncatedInf`: `s.truncatedInf a` is the infimum of all `b ≤ a` in `𝒜` if there are
some, or `⊥` if there are none.
* `AhlswedeZhang.infSum`: LHS of the Ahlswede-Zhang identity.
* `AhlswedeZhang.le_infSum`: The sum of `1 / n.choose |A|` over an antichain is less than the RHS of
the Ahlswede-Zhang identity.
* `AhlswedeZhang.infSum_eq_one`: Ahlswede-Zhang identity.
## References
* [R. Ahlswede, Z. Zhang, *An identity in combinatorial extremal theory*](https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8708(90)90023-G)
* [D. T. Tru, *An AZ-style identity and Bollobás deficiency*](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcta.2007.03.005)
-/
section
variable (α : Type*) [Fintype α] [Nonempty α] {m n : ℕ}
open Finset Fintype Nat
private lemma binomial_sum_eq (h : n < m) :
∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), (n.choose i * (m - n) / ((m - i) * m.choose i) : ℚ) = 1 := by
set f : ℕ → ℚ := fun i ↦ n.choose i * (m.choose i : ℚ)⁻¹ with hf
suffices ∀ i ∈ range (n + 1), f i - f (i + 1) = n.choose i * (m - n) / ((m - i) * m.choose i) by
rw [← sum_congr rfl this, sum_range_sub', hf]
simp [choose_self, choose_zero_right, choose_eq_zero_of_lt h]
intro i h₁
rw [mem_range] at h₁
have h₁ := le_of_lt_succ h₁
have h₂ := h₁.trans_lt h
have h₃ := h₂.le
have hi₄ : (i + 1 : ℚ) ≠ 0 := i.cast_add_one_ne_zero
have := congr_arg ((↑) : ℕ → ℚ) (choose_succ_right_eq m i)
push_cast at this
dsimp [f, hf]
rw [(eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq₀ hi₄).mpr this]
have := congr_arg ((↑) : ℕ → ℚ) (choose_succ_right_eq n i)
push_cast at this
rw [(eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq₀ hi₄).mpr this]
have : (m - i : ℚ) ≠ 0 := sub_ne_zero_of_ne (cast_lt.mpr h₂).ne'
have : (m.choose i : ℚ) ≠ 0 := cast_ne_zero.2 (choose_pos h₂.le).ne'
field_simp
ring
private lemma Fintype.sum_div_mul_card_choose_card :
∑ s : Finset α, (card α / ((card α - #s) * (card α).choose #s) : ℚ) =
card α * ∑ k ∈ range (card α), (↑k)⁻¹ + 1 := by
rw [← powerset_univ, powerset_card_disjiUnion, sum_disjiUnion]
have : ∀ {x : ℕ}, ∀ s ∈ powersetCard x (univ : Finset α),
(card α / ((card α - #s) * (card α).choose #s) : ℚ) =
card α / ((card α - x) * (card α).choose x) := by
intros n s hs
rw [mem_powersetCard_univ.1 hs]
simp_rw [sum_congr rfl this, sum_const, card_powersetCard, card_univ, nsmul_eq_mul, mul_div,
mul_comm, ← mul_div]
rw [← mul_sum, ← mul_inv_cancel₀ (cast_ne_zero.mpr card_ne_zero : (card α : ℚ) ≠ 0), ← mul_add,
add_comm _ ((card α)⁻¹ : ℚ), ← sum_insert (f := fun x : ℕ ↦ (x⁻¹ : ℚ)) not_mem_range_self,
← range_succ]
have (n) (hn : n ∈ range (card α + 1)) :
((card α).choose n / ((card α - n) * (card α).choose n) : ℚ) = (card α - n : ℚ)⁻¹ := by
rw [div_mul_cancel_right₀]
exact cast_ne_zero.2 (choose_pos <| mem_range_succ_iff.1 hn).ne'
simp only [sum_congr rfl this, mul_eq_mul_left_iff, cast_eq_zero]
convert Or.inl <| sum_range_reflect _ _ with a ha
rw [add_tsub_cancel_right, cast_sub (mem_range_succ_iff.mp ha)]
end
open scoped FinsetFamily
namespace Finset
variable {α β : Type*}
/-! ### Truncated supremum, truncated infimum -/
section SemilatticeSup
variable [SemilatticeSup α] [SemilatticeSup β] [BoundedOrder β] {s t : Finset α} {a : α}
private lemma sup_aux [DecidableLE α] : a ∈ lowerClosure s → {b ∈ s | a ≤ b}.Nonempty :=
fun ⟨b, hb, hab⟩ ↦ ⟨b, mem_filter.2 ⟨hb, hab⟩⟩
private lemma lower_aux [DecidableEq α] :
a ∈ lowerClosure ↑(s ∪ t) ↔ a ∈ lowerClosure s ∨ a ∈ lowerClosure t := by
rw [coe_union, lowerClosure_union, LowerSet.mem_sup_iff]
variable [DecidableLE α] [OrderTop α]
/-- The supremum of the elements of `s` less than `a` if there are some, otherwise `⊤`. -/
def truncatedSup (s : Finset α) (a : α) : α :=
if h : a ∈ lowerClosure s then {b ∈ s | a ≤ b}.sup' (sup_aux h) id else ⊤
lemma truncatedSup_of_mem (h : a ∈ lowerClosure s) :
truncatedSup s a = {b ∈ s | a ≤ b}.sup' (sup_aux h) id := dif_pos h
lemma truncatedSup_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ lowerClosure s) : truncatedSup s a = ⊤ := dif_neg h
@[simp] lemma truncatedSup_empty (a : α) : truncatedSup ∅ a = ⊤ := truncatedSup_of_not_mem (by simp)
@[simp] lemma truncatedSup_singleton (b a : α) : truncatedSup {b} a = if a ≤ b then b else ⊤ := by
simp [truncatedSup]; split_ifs <;> simp [Finset.filter_true_of_mem, *]
lemma le_truncatedSup : a ≤ truncatedSup s a := by
rw [truncatedSup]
split_ifs with h
· obtain ⟨ℬ, hb, h⟩ := h
exact h.trans <| le_sup' id <| mem_filter.2 ⟨hb, h⟩
· exact le_top
lemma map_truncatedSup [DecidableLE β] (e : α ≃o β) (s : Finset α) (a : α) :
e (truncatedSup s a) = truncatedSup (s.map e.toEquiv.toEmbedding) (e a) := by
have : e a ∈ lowerClosure (s.map e.toEquiv.toEmbedding : Set β) ↔ a ∈ lowerClosure s := by simp
simp_rw [truncatedSup, apply_dite e, map_finset_sup', map_top, this]
congr with h
simp only [filter_map, Function.comp_def, Equiv.coe_toEmbedding, RelIso.coe_fn_toEquiv,
OrderIso.le_iff_le, id, sup'_map]
lemma truncatedSup_of_isAntichain (hs : IsAntichain (· ≤ ·) (s : Set α)) (ha : a ∈ s) :
truncatedSup s a = a := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ le_truncatedSup
simp_rw [truncatedSup_of_mem (subset_lowerClosure ha), sup'_le_iff, mem_filter]
rintro b ⟨hb, hab⟩
exact (hs.eq ha hb hab).ge
variable [DecidableEq α]
lemma truncatedSup_union (hs : a ∈ lowerClosure s) (ht : a ∈ lowerClosure t) :
truncatedSup (s ∪ t) a = truncatedSup s a ⊔ truncatedSup t a := by
simpa only [truncatedSup_of_mem, hs, ht, lower_aux.2 (Or.inl hs), filter_union] using
sup'_union _ _ _
lemma truncatedSup_union_left (hs : a ∈ lowerClosure s) (ht : a ∉ lowerClosure t) :
truncatedSup (s ∪ t) a = truncatedSup s a := by
simp only [mem_lowerClosure, mem_coe, exists_prop, not_exists, not_and] at ht
simp only [truncatedSup_of_mem, hs, filter_union, filter_false_of_mem ht, union_empty,
lower_aux.2 (Or.inl hs), ht]
lemma truncatedSup_union_right (hs : a ∉ lowerClosure s) (ht : a ∈ lowerClosure t) :
truncatedSup (s ∪ t) a = truncatedSup t a := by rw [union_comm, truncatedSup_union_left ht hs]
lemma truncatedSup_union_of_not_mem (hs : a ∉ lowerClosure s) (ht : a ∉ lowerClosure t) :
truncatedSup (s ∪ t) a = ⊤ := truncatedSup_of_not_mem fun h ↦ (lower_aux.1 h).elim hs ht
end SemilatticeSup
section SemilatticeInf
variable [SemilatticeInf α] [SemilatticeInf β]
[BoundedOrder β] [DecidableLE β] {s t : Finset α} {a : α}
private lemma inf_aux [DecidableLE α] : a ∈ upperClosure s → {b ∈ s | b ≤ a}.Nonempty :=
fun ⟨b, hb, hab⟩ ↦ ⟨b, mem_filter.2 ⟨hb, hab⟩⟩
private lemma upper_aux [DecidableEq α] :
a ∈ upperClosure ↑(s ∪ t) ↔ a ∈ upperClosure s ∨ a ∈ upperClosure t := by
rw [coe_union, upperClosure_union, UpperSet.mem_inf_iff]
variable [DecidableLE α] [BoundedOrder α]
/-- The infimum of the elements of `s` less than `a` if there are some, otherwise `⊥`. -/
def truncatedInf (s : Finset α) (a : α) : α :=
if h : a ∈ upperClosure s then {b ∈ s | b ≤ a}.inf' (inf_aux h) id else ⊥
lemma truncatedInf_of_mem (h : a ∈ upperClosure s) :
truncatedInf s a = {b ∈ s | b ≤ a}.inf' (inf_aux h) id := dif_pos h
lemma truncatedInf_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ upperClosure s) : truncatedInf s a = ⊥ := dif_neg h
lemma truncatedInf_le : truncatedInf s a ≤ a := by
unfold truncatedInf
split_ifs with h
· obtain ⟨b, hb, hba⟩ := h
exact hba.trans' <| inf'_le id <| mem_filter.2 ⟨hb, ‹_›⟩
· exact bot_le
@[simp] lemma truncatedInf_empty (a : α) : truncatedInf ∅ a = ⊥ := truncatedInf_of_not_mem (by simp)
@[simp] lemma truncatedInf_singleton (b a : α) : truncatedInf {b} a = if b ≤ a then b else ⊥ := by
simp only [truncatedInf, coe_singleton, upperClosure_singleton, UpperSet.mem_Ici_iff,
filter_congr_decidable, id_eq]
split_ifs <;> simp [Finset.filter_true_of_mem, *]
lemma map_truncatedInf (e : α ≃o β) (s : Finset α) (a : α) :
e (truncatedInf s a) = truncatedInf (s.map e.toEquiv.toEmbedding) (e a) := by
have : e a ∈ upperClosure (s.map e.toEquiv.toEmbedding) ↔ a ∈ upperClosure s := by simp
simp_rw [truncatedInf, apply_dite e, map_finset_inf', map_bot, this]
congr with h
simp only [filter_map, Function.comp_def, Equiv.coe_toEmbedding, RelIso.coe_fn_toEquiv,
OrderIso.le_iff_le, id, inf'_map]
lemma truncatedInf_of_isAntichain (hs : IsAntichain (· ≤ ·) (s : Set α)) (ha : a ∈ s) :
truncatedInf s a = a := by
refine le_antisymm truncatedInf_le ?_
simp_rw [truncatedInf_of_mem (subset_upperClosure ha), le_inf'_iff, mem_filter]
rintro b ⟨hb, hba⟩
exact (hs.eq hb ha hba).ge
variable [DecidableEq α]
lemma truncatedInf_union (hs : a ∈ upperClosure s) (ht : a ∈ upperClosure t) :
truncatedInf (s ∪ t) a = truncatedInf s a ⊓ truncatedInf t a := by
simpa only [truncatedInf_of_mem, hs, ht, upper_aux.2 (Or.inl hs), filter_union] using
inf'_union _ _ _
lemma truncatedInf_union_left (hs : a ∈ upperClosure s) (ht : a ∉ upperClosure t) :
truncatedInf (s ∪ t) a = truncatedInf s a := by
simp only [mem_upperClosure, mem_coe, exists_prop, not_exists, not_and] at ht
simp only [truncatedInf_of_mem, hs, filter_union, filter_false_of_mem ht, union_empty,
upper_aux.2 (Or.inl hs), ht]
lemma truncatedInf_union_right (hs : a ∉ upperClosure s) (ht : a ∈ upperClosure t) :
truncatedInf (s ∪ t) a = truncatedInf t a := by
rw [union_comm, truncatedInf_union_left ht hs]
lemma truncatedInf_union_of_not_mem (hs : a ∉ upperClosure s) (ht : a ∉ upperClosure t) :
truncatedInf (s ∪ t) a = ⊥ :=
truncatedInf_of_not_mem <| by rw [coe_union, upperClosure_union]; exact fun h ↦ h.elim hs ht
end SemilatticeInf
section DistribLattice
variable [DistribLattice α] [DecidableEq α] {s t : Finset α} {a : α}
private lemma infs_aux : a ∈ lowerClosure ↑(s ⊼ t) ↔ a ∈ lowerClosure s ∧ a ∈ lowerClosure t := by
rw [coe_infs, lowerClosure_infs, LowerSet.mem_inf_iff]
private lemma sups_aux : a ∈ upperClosure ↑(s ⊻ t) ↔ a ∈ upperClosure s ∧ a ∈ upperClosure t := by
rw [coe_sups, upperClosure_sups, UpperSet.mem_sup_iff]
variable [DecidableLE α] [BoundedOrder α]
lemma truncatedSup_infs (hs : a ∈ lowerClosure s) (ht : a ∈ lowerClosure t) :
truncatedSup (s ⊼ t) a = truncatedSup s a ⊓ truncatedSup t a := by
simp only [truncatedSup_of_mem, hs, ht, infs_aux.2 ⟨hs, ht⟩, sup'_inf_sup', filter_infs_le]
simp_rw [← image_inf_product]
rw [sup'_image]
simp [Function.uncurry_def]
lemma truncatedInf_sups (hs : a ∈ upperClosure s) (ht : a ∈ upperClosure t) :
truncatedInf (s ⊻ t) a = truncatedInf s a ⊔ truncatedInf t a := by
simp only [truncatedInf_of_mem, hs, ht, sups_aux.2 ⟨hs, ht⟩, inf'_sup_inf', filter_sups_le]
simp_rw [← image_sup_product]
rw [inf'_image]
simp [Function.uncurry_def]
lemma truncatedSup_infs_of_not_mem (ha : a ∉ lowerClosure s ⊓ lowerClosure t) :
truncatedSup (s ⊼ t) a = ⊤ :=
truncatedSup_of_not_mem <| by rwa [coe_infs, lowerClosure_infs]
lemma truncatedInf_sups_of_not_mem (ha : a ∉ upperClosure s ⊔ upperClosure t) :
truncatedInf (s ⊻ t) a = ⊥ :=
truncatedInf_of_not_mem <| by rwa [coe_sups, upperClosure_sups]
end DistribLattice
section BooleanAlgebra
variable [BooleanAlgebra α] [DecidableLE α]
@[simp] lemma compl_truncatedSup (s : Finset α) (a : α) :
(truncatedSup s a)ᶜ = truncatedInf sᶜˢ aᶜ := map_truncatedSup (OrderIso.compl α) _ _
@[simp] lemma compl_truncatedInf (s : Finset α) (a : α) :
(truncatedInf s a)ᶜ = truncatedSup sᶜˢ aᶜ := map_truncatedInf (OrderIso.compl α) _ _
end BooleanAlgebra
variable [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α]
lemma card_truncatedSup_union_add_card_truncatedSup_infs (𝒜 ℬ : Finset (Finset α)) (s : Finset α) :
#(truncatedSup (𝒜 ∪ ℬ) s) + #(truncatedSup (𝒜 ⊼ ℬ) s) =
#(truncatedSup 𝒜 s) + #(truncatedSup ℬ s) := by
by_cases h𝒜 : s ∈ lowerClosure (𝒜 : Set <| Finset α) <;>
by_cases hℬ : s ∈ lowerClosure (ℬ : Set <| Finset α)
· rw [truncatedSup_union h𝒜 hℬ, truncatedSup_infs h𝒜 hℬ]
exact card_union_add_card_inter _ _
· rw [truncatedSup_union_left h𝒜 hℬ, truncatedSup_of_not_mem hℬ,
truncatedSup_infs_of_not_mem fun h ↦ hℬ h.2]
· rw [truncatedSup_union_right h𝒜 hℬ, truncatedSup_of_not_mem h𝒜,
truncatedSup_infs_of_not_mem fun h ↦ h𝒜 h.1, add_comm]
· rw [truncatedSup_of_not_mem h𝒜, truncatedSup_of_not_mem hℬ,
truncatedSup_union_of_not_mem h𝒜 hℬ, truncatedSup_infs_of_not_mem fun h ↦ h𝒜 h.1]
lemma card_truncatedInf_union_add_card_truncatedInf_sups (𝒜 ℬ : Finset (Finset α)) (s : Finset α) :
#(truncatedInf (𝒜 ∪ ℬ) s) + #(truncatedInf (𝒜 ⊻ ℬ) s) =
#(truncatedInf 𝒜 s) + #(truncatedInf ℬ s) := by
by_cases h𝒜 : s ∈ upperClosure (𝒜 : Set <| Finset α) <;>
by_cases hℬ : s ∈ upperClosure (ℬ : Set <| Finset α)
· rw [truncatedInf_union h𝒜 hℬ, truncatedInf_sups h𝒜 hℬ]
exact card_inter_add_card_union _ _
· rw [truncatedInf_union_left h𝒜 hℬ, truncatedInf_of_not_mem hℬ,
truncatedInf_sups_of_not_mem fun h ↦ hℬ h.2]
· rw [truncatedInf_union_right h𝒜 hℬ, truncatedInf_of_not_mem h𝒜,
truncatedInf_sups_of_not_mem fun h ↦ h𝒜 h.1, add_comm]
· rw [truncatedInf_of_not_mem h𝒜, truncatedInf_of_not_mem hℬ,
truncatedInf_union_of_not_mem h𝒜 hℬ, truncatedInf_sups_of_not_mem fun h ↦ h𝒜 h.1]
end Finset
open Finset hiding card
open Fintype Nat
namespace AhlswedeZhang
variable {α : Type*} [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α] {𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)} {s : Finset α}
/-- Weighted sum of the size of the truncated infima of a set family. Relevant to the
Ahlswede-Zhang identity. -/
def infSum (𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) : ℚ :=
∑ s, #(truncatedInf 𝒜 s) / (#s * (card α).choose #s)
/-- Weighted sum of the size of the truncated suprema of a set family. Relevant to the
Ahlswede-Zhang identity. -/
def supSum (𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) : ℚ :=
∑ s, #(truncatedSup 𝒜 s) / ((card α - #s) * (card α).choose #s)
lemma supSum_union_add_supSum_infs (𝒜 ℬ : Finset (Finset α)) :
supSum (𝒜 ∪ ℬ) + supSum (𝒜 ⊼ ℬ) = supSum 𝒜 + supSum ℬ := by
unfold supSum
rw [← sum_add_distrib, ← sum_add_distrib, sum_congr rfl fun s _ ↦ _]
simp_rw [div_add_div_same, ← Nat.cast_add, card_truncatedSup_union_add_card_truncatedSup_infs]
simp
lemma infSum_union_add_infSum_sups (𝒜 ℬ : Finset (Finset α)) :
infSum (𝒜 ∪ ℬ) + infSum (𝒜 ⊻ ℬ) = infSum 𝒜 + infSum ℬ := by
unfold infSum
rw [← sum_add_distrib, ← sum_add_distrib, sum_congr rfl fun s _ ↦ _]
simp_rw [div_add_div_same, ← Nat.cast_add, card_truncatedInf_union_add_card_truncatedInf_sups]
simp
lemma IsAntichain.le_infSum (h𝒜 : IsAntichain (· ⊆ ·) (𝒜 : Set (Finset α))) (h𝒜₀ : ∅ ∉ 𝒜) :
∑ s ∈ 𝒜, ((card α).choose #s : ℚ)⁻¹ ≤ infSum 𝒜 := by
calc
_ = ∑ s ∈ 𝒜, #(truncatedInf 𝒜 s) / (#s * (card α).choose #s : ℚ) := ?_
_ ≤ _ := sum_le_univ_sum_of_nonneg fun s ↦ by positivity
refine sum_congr rfl fun s hs ↦ ?_
rw [truncatedInf_of_isAntichain h𝒜 hs, div_mul_cancel_left₀]
have := (nonempty_iff_ne_empty.2 <| ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hs h𝒜₀).card_pos
positivity
variable [Nonempty α]
@[simp] lemma supSum_singleton (hs : s ≠ univ) :
supSum ({s} : Finset (Finset α)) = card α * ∑ k ∈ range (card α), (k : ℚ)⁻¹ := by
have : ∀ t : Finset α,
(card α - #(truncatedSup {s} t) : ℚ) / ((card α - #t) * (card α).choose #t) =
if t ⊆ s then (card α - #s : ℚ) / ((card α - #t) * (card α).choose #t) else 0 := by
rintro t
simp_rw [truncatedSup_singleton, le_iff_subset]
split_ifs <;> simp
simp_rw [← sub_eq_of_eq_add (Fintype.sum_div_mul_card_choose_card α), eq_sub_iff_add_eq,
← eq_sub_iff_add_eq', supSum, ← sum_sub_distrib, ← sub_div]
rw [sum_congr rfl fun t _ ↦ this t, sum_ite, sum_const_zero, add_zero, filter_subset_univ,
sum_powerset, ← binomial_sum_eq ((card_lt_iff_ne_univ _).2 hs), eq_comm]
refine sum_congr rfl fun n _ ↦ ?_
rw [mul_div_assoc, ← nsmul_eq_mul]
exact sum_powersetCard n s fun m ↦ (card α - #s : ℚ) / ((card α - m) * (card α).choose m)
/-- The **Ahlswede-Zhang Identity**. -/
lemma infSum_compls_add_supSum (𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) :
infSum 𝒜ᶜˢ + supSum 𝒜 = card α * ∑ k ∈ range (card α), (k : ℚ)⁻¹ + 1 := by
unfold infSum supSum
rw [← @map_univ_of_surjective (Finset α) _ _ _ ⟨compl, compl_injective⟩ compl_surjective, sum_map]
simp only [Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk, univ_map_embedding, ← compl_truncatedSup,
← sum_add_distrib, card_compl, cast_sub (card_le_univ _), choose_symm (card_le_univ _),
div_add_div_same, sub_add_cancel, Fintype.sum_div_mul_card_choose_card]
lemma supSum_of_not_univ_mem (h𝒜₁ : 𝒜.Nonempty) (h𝒜₂ : univ ∉ 𝒜) :
supSum 𝒜 = card α * ∑ k ∈ range (card α), (k : ℚ)⁻¹ := by
set m := 𝒜.card with hm
clear_value m
induction m using Nat.strongRecOn generalizing 𝒜 with | ind m ih => _
replace ih := fun 𝒜 h𝒜 h𝒜₁ h𝒜₂ ↦ @ih _ h𝒜 𝒜 h𝒜₁ h𝒜₂ rfl
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ | h𝒜₃ := h𝒜₁.exists_eq_singleton_or_nontrivial
· refine supSum_singleton ?_
simpa [eq_comm] using h𝒜₂
cases m
· cases h𝒜₁.card_pos.ne hm
obtain ⟨s, 𝒜, hs, rfl, rfl⟩ := card_eq_succ.1 hm.symm
have h𝒜 : 𝒜.Nonempty := nonempty_iff_ne_empty.2 (by rintro rfl; simp at h𝒜₃)
rw [insert_eq, eq_sub_of_add_eq (supSum_union_add_supSum_infs _ _), singleton_infs,
supSum_singleton (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem (mem_insert_self _ _) h𝒜₂), ih, ih, add_sub_cancel_right]
· exact card_image_le.trans_lt (lt_add_one _)
· exact h𝒜.image _
· simpa using fun _ ↦ ne_of_mem_of_not_mem (mem_insert_self _ _) h𝒜₂
| · exact lt_add_one _
· exact h𝒜
· exact fun h ↦ h𝒜₂ (mem_insert_of_mem h)
/-- The **Ahlswede-Zhang Identity**. -/
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SetFamily/AhlswedeZhang.lean | 411 | 415 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Patrick Massot, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.FundThmCalculus
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.IntegrationByParts
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/IntervalIntegral.lean | 600 | 602 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.PDeriv
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Derivative
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.SMul
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Sum
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.LinearIndependent.Lemmas
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Pochhammer
/-!
# Bernstein polynomials
The definition of the Bernstein polynomials
```
bernsteinPolynomial (R : Type*) [CommRing R] (n ν : ℕ) : R[X] :=
(choose n ν) * X^ν * (1 - X)^(n - ν)
```
and the fact that for `ν : Fin (n+1)` these are linearly independent over `ℚ`.
We prove the basic identities
* `(Finset.range (n + 1)).sum (fun ν ↦ bernsteinPolynomial R n ν) = 1`
* `(Finset.range (n + 1)).sum (fun ν ↦ ν • bernsteinPolynomial R n ν) = n • X`
* `(Finset.range (n + 1)).sum (fun ν ↦ (ν * (ν-1)) • bernsteinPolynomial R n ν) = (n * (n-1)) • X^2`
## Notes
See also `Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Bernstein`, which defines the Bernstein approximations
of a continuous function `f : C([0,1], ℝ)`, and shows that these converge uniformly to `f`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Nat (choose)
open Polynomial (X)
open scoped Polynomial
variable (R : Type*) [CommRing R]
/-- `bernsteinPolynomial R n ν` is `(choose n ν) * X^ν * (1 - X)^(n - ν)`.
Although the coefficients are integers, it is convenient to work over an arbitrary commutative ring.
-/
def bernsteinPolynomial (n ν : ℕ) : R[X] :=
(choose n ν : R[X]) * X ^ ν * (1 - X) ^ (n - ν)
example : bernsteinPolynomial ℤ 3 2 = 3 * X ^ 2 - 3 * X ^ 3 := by
norm_num [bernsteinPolynomial, choose]
ring
namespace bernsteinPolynomial
theorem eq_zero_of_lt {n ν : ℕ} (h : n < ν) : bernsteinPolynomial R n ν = 0 := by
simp [bernsteinPolynomial, Nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt h]
section
variable {R} {S : Type*} [CommRing S]
@[simp]
theorem map (f : R →+* S) (n ν : ℕ) :
(bernsteinPolynomial R n ν).map f = bernsteinPolynomial S n ν := by simp [bernsteinPolynomial]
end
theorem flip (n ν : ℕ) (h : ν ≤ n) :
(bernsteinPolynomial R n ν).comp (1 - X) = bernsteinPolynomial R n (n - ν) := by
simp [bernsteinPolynomial, h, tsub_tsub_assoc, mul_right_comm]
theorem flip' (n ν : ℕ) (h : ν ≤ n) :
bernsteinPolynomial R n ν = (bernsteinPolynomial R n (n - ν)).comp (1 - X) := by
simp [← flip _ _ _ h, Polynomial.comp_assoc]
theorem eval_at_0 (n ν : ℕ) : (bernsteinPolynomial R n ν).eval 0 = if ν = 0 then 1 else 0 := by
rw [bernsteinPolynomial]
split_ifs with h
· subst h; simp
· simp [zero_pow h]
| theorem eval_at_1 (n ν : ℕ) : (bernsteinPolynomial R n ν).eval 1 = if ν = n then 1 else 0 := by
rw [bernsteinPolynomial]
split_ifs with h
· subst h; simp
· obtain hνn | hnν := Ne.lt_or_lt h
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Bernstein.lean | 86 | 90 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.CauSeq.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Star.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Norm
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Sum
/-!
# Exponential Function
This file contains the definitions of the real and complex exponential function.
## Main definitions
* `Complex.exp`: The complex exponential function, defined via its Taylor series
* `Real.exp`: The real exponential function, defined as the real part of the complex exponential
-/
open CauSeq Finset IsAbsoluteValue
open scoped ComplexConjugate
namespace Complex
theorem isCauSeq_norm_exp (z : ℂ) :
IsCauSeq abs fun n => ∑ m ∈ range n, ‖z ^ m / m.factorial‖ :=
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_nat_gt ‖z‖
have hn0 : (0 : ℝ) < n := lt_of_le_of_lt (norm_nonneg _) hn
IsCauSeq.series_ratio_test n (‖z‖ / n) (div_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (le_of_lt hn0))
(by rwa [div_lt_iff₀ hn0, one_mul]) fun m hm => by
rw [abs_norm, abs_norm, Nat.factorial_succ, pow_succ', mul_comm m.succ, Nat.cast_mul,
← div_div, mul_div_assoc, mul_div_right_comm, Complex.norm_mul, Complex.norm_div,
norm_natCast]
gcongr
exact le_trans hm (Nat.le_succ _)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias isCauSeq_abs_exp := isCauSeq_norm_exp
noncomputable section
theorem isCauSeq_exp (z : ℂ) : IsCauSeq (‖·‖) fun n => ∑ m ∈ range n, z ^ m / m.factorial :=
(isCauSeq_norm_exp z).of_abv
/-- The Cauchy sequence consisting of partial sums of the Taylor series of
the complex exponential function -/
@[pp_nodot]
def exp' (z : ℂ) : CauSeq ℂ (‖·‖) :=
⟨fun n => ∑ m ∈ range n, z ^ m / m.factorial, isCauSeq_exp z⟩
/-- The complex exponential function, defined via its Taylor series -/
@[pp_nodot]
def exp (z : ℂ) : ℂ :=
CauSeq.lim (exp' z)
/-- scoped notation for the complex exponential function -/
scoped notation "cexp" => Complex.exp
end
end Complex
namespace Real
open Complex
noncomputable section
/-- The real exponential function, defined as the real part of the complex exponential -/
@[pp_nodot]
nonrec def exp (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(exp x).re
/-- scoped notation for the real exponential function -/
scoped notation "rexp" => Real.exp
end
end Real
namespace Complex
variable (x y : ℂ)
@[simp]
theorem exp_zero : exp 0 = 1 := by
rw [exp]
refine lim_eq_of_equiv_const fun ε ε0 => ⟨1, fun j hj => ?_⟩
convert (config := .unfoldSameFun) ε0 -- ε0 : ε > 0 but goal is _ < ε
rcases j with - | j
· exact absurd hj (not_le_of_gt zero_lt_one)
· dsimp [exp']
induction' j with j ih
· dsimp [exp']; simp [show Nat.succ 0 = 1 from rfl]
· rw [← ih (by simp [Nat.succ_le_succ])]
simp only [sum_range_succ, pow_succ]
simp
theorem exp_add : exp (x + y) = exp x * exp y := by
have hj : ∀ j : ℕ, (∑ m ∈ range j, (x + y) ^ m / m.factorial) =
∑ i ∈ range j, ∑ k ∈ range (i + 1), x ^ k / k.factorial *
(y ^ (i - k) / (i - k).factorial) := by
intro j
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun m _ => ?_
rw [add_pow, div_eq_mul_inv, sum_mul]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun I hi => ?_
have h₁ : (m.choose I : ℂ) ≠ 0 :=
Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 (pos_iff_ne_zero.1 (Nat.choose_pos (Nat.le_of_lt_succ (mem_range.1 hi))))
have h₂ := Nat.choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (Nat.le_of_lt_succ <| Finset.mem_range.1 hi)
rw [← h₂, Nat.cast_mul, Nat.cast_mul, mul_inv, mul_inv]
simp only [mul_left_comm (m.choose I : ℂ), mul_assoc, mul_left_comm (m.choose I : ℂ)⁻¹,
mul_comm (m.choose I : ℂ)]
rw [inv_mul_cancel₀ h₁]
simp [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]
simp_rw [exp, exp', lim_mul_lim]
apply (lim_eq_lim_of_equiv _).symm
simp only [hj]
exact cauchy_product (isCauSeq_norm_exp x) (isCauSeq_exp y)
/-- the exponential function as a monoid hom from `Multiplicative ℂ` to `ℂ` -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def expMonoidHom : MonoidHom (Multiplicative ℂ) ℂ :=
{ toFun := fun z => exp z.toAdd,
map_one' := by simp,
map_mul' := by simp [exp_add] }
theorem exp_list_sum (l : List ℂ) : exp l.sum = (l.map exp).prod :=
map_list_prod (M := Multiplicative ℂ) expMonoidHom l
theorem exp_multiset_sum (s : Multiset ℂ) : exp s.sum = (s.map exp).prod :=
@MonoidHom.map_multiset_prod (Multiplicative ℂ) ℂ _ _ expMonoidHom s
theorem exp_sum {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℂ) :
exp (∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, exp (f x) :=
map_prod (β := Multiplicative ℂ) expMonoidHom f s
lemma exp_nsmul (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : exp (n • x) = exp x ^ n :=
@MonoidHom.map_pow (Multiplicative ℂ) ℂ _ _ expMonoidHom _ _
theorem exp_nat_mul (x : ℂ) : ∀ n : ℕ, exp (n * x) = exp x ^ n
| 0 => by rw [Nat.cast_zero, zero_mul, exp_zero, pow_zero]
| Nat.succ n => by rw [pow_succ, Nat.cast_add_one, add_mul, exp_add, ← exp_nat_mul _ n, one_mul]
@[simp]
theorem exp_ne_zero : exp x ≠ 0 := fun h =>
zero_ne_one (α := ℂ) <| by rw [← exp_zero, ← add_neg_cancel x, exp_add, h]; simp
theorem exp_neg : exp (-x) = (exp x)⁻¹ := by
rw [← mul_right_inj' (exp_ne_zero x), ← exp_add]; simp [mul_inv_cancel₀ (exp_ne_zero x)]
theorem exp_sub : exp (x - y) = exp x / exp y := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, exp_add, exp_neg, div_eq_mul_inv]
theorem exp_int_mul (z : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : Complex.exp (n * z) = Complex.exp z ^ n := by
cases n
· simp [exp_nat_mul]
· simp [exp_add, add_mul, pow_add, exp_neg, exp_nat_mul]
@[simp]
theorem exp_conj : exp (conj x) = conj (exp x) := by
dsimp [exp]
rw [← lim_conj]
refine congr_arg CauSeq.lim (CauSeq.ext fun _ => ?_)
dsimp [exp', Function.comp_def, cauSeqConj]
rw [map_sum (starRingEnd _)]
refine sum_congr rfl fun n _ => ?_
rw [map_div₀, map_pow, ← ofReal_natCast, conj_ofReal]
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_exp_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : ((exp x).re : ℂ) = exp x :=
conj_eq_iff_re.1 <| by rw [← exp_conj, conj_ofReal]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_exp (x : ℝ) : (Real.exp x : ℂ) = exp x :=
ofReal_exp_ofReal_re _
@[simp]
theorem exp_ofReal_im (x : ℝ) : (exp x).im = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_exp_ofReal_re, ofReal_im]
theorem exp_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : (exp x).re = Real.exp x :=
rfl
end Complex
namespace Real
open Complex
variable (x y : ℝ)
@[simp]
theorem exp_zero : exp 0 = 1 := by simp [Real.exp]
nonrec theorem exp_add : exp (x + y) = exp x * exp y := by simp [exp_add, exp]
/-- the exponential function as a monoid hom from `Multiplicative ℝ` to `ℝ` -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def expMonoidHom : MonoidHom (Multiplicative ℝ) ℝ :=
{ toFun := fun x => exp x.toAdd,
map_one' := by simp,
map_mul' := by simp [exp_add] }
theorem exp_list_sum (l : List ℝ) : exp l.sum = (l.map exp).prod :=
map_list_prod (M := Multiplicative ℝ) expMonoidHom l
theorem exp_multiset_sum (s : Multiset ℝ) : exp s.sum = (s.map exp).prod :=
@MonoidHom.map_multiset_prod (Multiplicative ℝ) ℝ _ _ expMonoidHom s
theorem exp_sum {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ) :
exp (∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, exp (f x) :=
map_prod (β := Multiplicative ℝ) expMonoidHom f s
lemma exp_nsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : exp (n • x) = exp x ^ n :=
@MonoidHom.map_pow (Multiplicative ℝ) ℝ _ _ expMonoidHom _ _
nonrec theorem exp_nat_mul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : exp (n * x) = exp x ^ n :=
ofReal_injective (by simp [exp_nat_mul])
@[simp]
nonrec theorem exp_ne_zero : exp x ≠ 0 := fun h =>
exp_ne_zero x <| by rw [exp, ← ofReal_inj] at h; simp_all
nonrec theorem exp_neg : exp (-x) = (exp x)⁻¹ :=
ofReal_injective <| by simp [exp_neg]
theorem exp_sub : exp (x - y) = exp x / exp y := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, exp_add, exp_neg, div_eq_mul_inv]
open IsAbsoluteValue Nat
theorem sum_le_exp_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (n : ℕ) : ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i / i ! ≤ exp x :=
calc
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i / i ! ≤ lim (⟨_, isCauSeq_re (exp' x)⟩ : CauSeq ℝ abs) := by
refine le_lim (CauSeq.le_of_exists ⟨n, fun j hj => ?_⟩)
simp only [exp', const_apply, re_sum]
norm_cast
refine sum_le_sum_of_subset_of_nonneg (range_mono hj) fun _ _ _ ↦ ?_
positivity
_ = exp x := by rw [exp, Complex.exp, ← cauSeqRe, lim_re]
lemma pow_div_factorial_le_exp (hx : 0 ≤ x) (n : ℕ) : x ^ n / n ! ≤ exp x :=
calc
x ^ n / n ! ≤ ∑ k ∈ range (n + 1), x ^ k / k ! :=
single_le_sum (f := fun k ↦ x ^ k / k !) (fun k _ ↦ by positivity) (self_mem_range_succ n)
_ ≤ exp x := sum_le_exp_of_nonneg hx _
theorem quadratic_le_exp_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : 1 + x + x ^ 2 / 2 ≤ exp x :=
calc
1 + x + x ^ 2 / 2 = ∑ i ∈ range 3, x ^ i / i ! := by
simp only [sum_range_succ, range_one, sum_singleton, _root_.pow_zero, factorial, cast_one,
ne_eq, one_ne_zero, not_false_eq_true, div_self, pow_one, mul_one, div_one, Nat.mul_one,
cast_succ, add_right_inj]
ring_nf
_ ≤ exp x := sum_le_exp_of_nonneg hx 3
private theorem add_one_lt_exp_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : x + 1 < exp x :=
(by nlinarith : x + 1 < 1 + x + x ^ 2 / 2).trans_le (quadratic_le_exp_of_nonneg hx.le)
private theorem add_one_le_exp_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : x + 1 ≤ exp x := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hx with (rfl | h)
· simp
exact (add_one_lt_exp_of_pos h).le
theorem one_le_exp {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : 1 ≤ exp x := by linarith [add_one_le_exp_of_nonneg hx]
@[bound]
theorem exp_pos (x : ℝ) : 0 < exp x :=
(le_total 0 x).elim (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one ∘ one_le_exp) fun h => by
rw [← neg_neg x, Real.exp_neg]
exact inv_pos.2 (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (one_le_exp (neg_nonneg.2 h)))
@[bound]
lemma exp_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ exp x := x.exp_pos.le
@[simp]
theorem abs_exp (x : ℝ) : |exp x| = exp x :=
abs_of_pos (exp_pos _)
lemma exp_abs_le (x : ℝ) : exp |x| ≤ exp x + exp (-x) := by
cases le_total x 0 <;> simp [abs_of_nonpos, abs_of_nonneg, exp_nonneg, *]
@[mono]
theorem exp_strictMono : StrictMono exp := fun x y h => by
rw [← sub_add_cancel y x, Real.exp_add]
exact (lt_mul_iff_one_lt_left (exp_pos _)).2
(lt_of_lt_of_le (by linarith) (add_one_le_exp_of_nonneg (by linarith)))
@[gcongr]
theorem exp_lt_exp_of_lt {x y : ℝ} (h : x < y) : exp x < exp y := exp_strictMono h
@[mono]
theorem exp_monotone : Monotone exp :=
exp_strictMono.monotone
@[gcongr, bound]
theorem exp_le_exp_of_le {x y : ℝ} (h : x ≤ y) : exp x ≤ exp y := exp_monotone h
@[simp]
theorem exp_lt_exp {x y : ℝ} : exp x < exp y ↔ x < y :=
exp_strictMono.lt_iff_lt
@[simp]
theorem exp_le_exp {x y : ℝ} : exp x ≤ exp y ↔ x ≤ y :=
exp_strictMono.le_iff_le
theorem exp_injective : Function.Injective exp :=
exp_strictMono.injective
@[simp]
theorem exp_eq_exp {x y : ℝ} : exp x = exp y ↔ x = y :=
exp_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem exp_eq_one_iff : exp x = 1 ↔ x = 0 :=
exp_injective.eq_iff' exp_zero
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_exp_iff {x : ℝ} : 1 < exp x ↔ 0 < x := by rw [← exp_zero, exp_lt_exp]
@[bound] private alias ⟨_, Bound.one_lt_exp_of_pos⟩ := one_lt_exp_iff
@[simp]
theorem exp_lt_one_iff {x : ℝ} : exp x < 1 ↔ x < 0 := by rw [← exp_zero, exp_lt_exp]
@[simp]
theorem exp_le_one_iff {x : ℝ} : exp x ≤ 1 ↔ x ≤ 0 :=
exp_zero ▸ exp_le_exp
@[simp]
theorem one_le_exp_iff {x : ℝ} : 1 ≤ exp x ↔ 0 ≤ x :=
exp_zero ▸ exp_le_exp
end Real
namespace Complex
theorem sum_div_factorial_le {α : Type*} [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
(n j : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) :
(∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (1 / m.factorial : α)) ≤ n.succ / (n.factorial * n) :=
calc
(∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (1 / m.factorial : α)) =
∑ m ∈ range (j - n), (1 / ((m + n).factorial : α)) := by
refine sum_nbij' (· - n) (· + n) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;>
simp +contextual [lt_tsub_iff_right, tsub_add_cancel_of_le]
_ ≤ ∑ m ∈ range (j - n), ((n.factorial : α) * (n.succ : α) ^ m)⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [one_div]
gcongr
rw [← Nat.cast_pow, ← Nat.cast_mul, Nat.cast_le, add_comm]
exact Nat.factorial_mul_pow_le_factorial
_ = (n.factorial : α)⁻¹ * ∑ m ∈ range (j - n), (n.succ : α)⁻¹ ^ m := by
simp [mul_inv, ← mul_sum, ← sum_mul, mul_comm, inv_pow]
_ = ((n.succ : α) - n.succ * (n.succ : α)⁻¹ ^ (j - n)) / (n.factorial * n) := by
have h₁ : (n.succ : α) ≠ 1 :=
@Nat.cast_one α _ ▸ mt Nat.cast_inj.1 (mt Nat.succ.inj (pos_iff_ne_zero.1 hn))
have h₂ : (n.succ : α) ≠ 0 := by positivity
have h₃ : (n.factorial * n : α) ≠ 0 := by positivity
have h₄ : (n.succ - 1 : α) = n := by simp
rw [geom_sum_inv h₁ h₂, eq_div_iff_mul_eq h₃, mul_comm _ (n.factorial * n : α),
← mul_assoc (n.factorial⁻¹ : α), ← mul_inv_rev, h₄, ← mul_assoc (n.factorial * n : α),
mul_comm (n : α) n.factorial, mul_inv_cancel₀ h₃, one_mul, mul_comm]
_ ≤ n.succ / (n.factorial * n : α) := by gcongr; apply sub_le_self; positivity
theorem exp_bound {x : ℂ} (hx : ‖x‖ ≤ 1) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
‖exp x - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ ≤
‖x‖ ^ n * ((n.succ : ℝ) * (n.factorial * n : ℝ)⁻¹) := by
rw [← lim_const (abv := norm) (∑ m ∈ range n, _), exp, sub_eq_add_neg,
← lim_neg, lim_add, ← lim_norm]
refine lim_le (CauSeq.le_of_exists ⟨n, fun j hj => ?_⟩)
simp_rw [← sub_eq_add_neg]
show
‖(∑ m ∈ range j, x ^ m / m.factorial) - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ ≤
‖x‖ ^ n * ((n.succ : ℝ) * (n.factorial * n : ℝ)⁻¹)
rw [sum_range_sub_sum_range hj]
calc
‖∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (x ^ m / m.factorial : ℂ)‖
= ‖∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (x ^ n * (x ^ (m - n) / m.factorial) : ℂ)‖ := by
refine congr_arg norm (sum_congr rfl fun m hm => ?_)
rw [mem_filter, mem_range] at hm
rw [← mul_div_assoc, ← pow_add, add_tsub_cancel_of_le hm.2]
_ ≤ ∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, ‖x ^ n * (x ^ (m - n) / m.factorial)‖ :=
IsAbsoluteValue.abv_sum norm ..
_ ≤ ∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, ‖x‖ ^ n * (1 / m.factorial) := by
simp_rw [Complex.norm_mul, Complex.norm_pow, Complex.norm_div, norm_natCast]
gcongr
rw [Complex.norm_pow]
exact pow_le_one₀ (norm_nonneg _) hx
_ = ‖x‖ ^ n * ∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (1 / m.factorial : ℝ) := by
simp [abs_mul, abv_pow abs, abs_div, ← mul_sum]
_ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ n * (n.succ * (n.factorial * n : ℝ)⁻¹) := by
gcongr
exact sum_div_factorial_le _ _ hn
theorem exp_bound' {x : ℂ} {n : ℕ} (hx : ‖x‖ / n.succ ≤ 1 / 2) :
‖exp x - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ n / n.factorial * 2 := by
rw [← lim_const (abv := norm) (∑ m ∈ range n, _),
exp, sub_eq_add_neg, ← lim_neg, lim_add, ← lim_norm]
refine lim_le (CauSeq.le_of_exists ⟨n, fun j hj => ?_⟩)
simp_rw [← sub_eq_add_neg]
show ‖(∑ m ∈ range j, x ^ m / m.factorial) - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ ≤
‖x‖ ^ n / n.factorial * 2
let k := j - n
have hj : j = n + k := (add_tsub_cancel_of_le hj).symm
rw [hj, sum_range_add_sub_sum_range]
calc
‖∑ i ∈ range k, x ^ (n + i) / ((n + i).factorial : ℂ)‖ ≤
∑ i ∈ range k, ‖x ^ (n + i) / ((n + i).factorial : ℂ)‖ :=
IsAbsoluteValue.abv_sum _ _ _
_ ≤ ∑ i ∈ range k, ‖x‖ ^ (n + i) / (n + i).factorial := by
simp [norm_natCast, Complex.norm_pow]
_ ≤ ∑ i ∈ range k, ‖x‖ ^ (n + i) / ((n.factorial : ℝ) * (n.succ : ℝ) ^ i) := ?_
_ = ∑ i ∈ range k, ‖x‖ ^ n / n.factorial * (‖x‖ ^ i / (n.succ : ℝ) ^ i) := ?_
_ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ n / ↑n.factorial * 2 := ?_
· gcongr
exact mod_cast Nat.factorial_mul_pow_le_factorial
· refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ _ => ?_
simp only [pow_add, div_eq_inv_mul, mul_inv, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc]
· rw [← mul_sum]
gcongr
simp_rw [← div_pow]
rw [geom_sum_eq, div_le_iff_of_neg]
· trans (-1 : ℝ)
· linarith
· simp only [neg_le_sub_iff_le_add, div_pow, Nat.cast_succ, le_add_iff_nonneg_left]
positivity
· linarith
· linarith
theorem norm_exp_sub_one_le {x : ℂ} (hx : ‖x‖ ≤ 1) : ‖exp x - 1‖ ≤ 2 * ‖x‖ :=
calc
‖exp x - 1‖ = ‖exp x - ∑ m ∈ range 1, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ := by simp [sum_range_succ]
_ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ 1 * ((Nat.succ 1 : ℝ) * ((Nat.factorial 1) * (1 : ℕ) : ℝ)⁻¹) :=
(exp_bound hx (by decide))
_ = 2 * ‖x‖ := by simp [two_mul, mul_two, mul_add, mul_comm, add_mul, Nat.factorial]
theorem norm_exp_sub_one_sub_id_le {x : ℂ} (hx : ‖x‖ ≤ 1) : ‖exp x - 1 - x‖ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ 2 :=
calc
‖exp x - 1 - x‖ = ‖exp x - ∑ m ∈ range 2, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sum_range_succ_comm, add_assoc, Nat.factorial]
_ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ 2 * ((Nat.succ 2 : ℝ) * (Nat.factorial 2 * (2 : ℕ) : ℝ)⁻¹) :=
(exp_bound hx (by decide))
_ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ 2 * 1 := by gcongr; norm_num [Nat.factorial]
_ = ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by rw [mul_one]
lemma norm_exp_sub_sum_le_exp_norm_sub_sum (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) :
‖exp x - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖
≤ Real.exp ‖x‖ - ∑ m ∈ range n, ‖x‖ ^ m / m.factorial := by
rw [← CauSeq.lim_const (abv := norm) (∑ m ∈ range n, _), Complex.exp, sub_eq_add_neg,
← CauSeq.lim_neg, CauSeq.lim_add, ← lim_norm]
refine CauSeq.lim_le (CauSeq.le_of_exists ⟨n, fun j hj => ?_⟩)
simp_rw [← sub_eq_add_neg]
calc ‖(∑ m ∈ range j, x ^ m / m.factorial) - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖
_ ≤ (∑ m ∈ range j, ‖x‖ ^ m / m.factorial) - ∑ m ∈ range n, ‖x‖ ^ m / m.factorial := by
rw [sum_range_sub_sum_range hj, sum_range_sub_sum_range hj]
refine (IsAbsoluteValue.abv_sum norm ..).trans_eq ?_
congr with i
simp [Complex.norm_pow]
_ ≤ Real.exp ‖x‖ - ∑ m ∈ range n, ‖x‖ ^ m / m.factorial := by
gcongr
exact Real.sum_le_exp_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) _
lemma norm_exp_le_exp_norm (x : ℂ) : ‖exp x‖ ≤ Real.exp ‖x‖ := by
convert norm_exp_sub_sum_le_exp_norm_sub_sum x 0 using 1 <;> simp
lemma norm_exp_sub_sum_le_norm_mul_exp (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) :
‖exp x - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ n * Real.exp ‖x‖ := by
rw [← CauSeq.lim_const (abv := norm) (∑ m ∈ range n, _), Complex.exp, sub_eq_add_neg,
← CauSeq.lim_neg, CauSeq.lim_add, ← lim_norm]
refine CauSeq.lim_le (CauSeq.le_of_exists ⟨n, fun j hj => ?_⟩)
simp_rw [← sub_eq_add_neg]
show ‖(∑ m ∈ range j, x ^ m / m.factorial) - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ ≤ _
rw [sum_range_sub_sum_range hj]
calc
‖∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (x ^ m / m.factorial : ℂ)‖
= ‖∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (x ^ n * (x ^ (m - n) / m.factorial) : ℂ)‖ := by
refine congr_arg norm (sum_congr rfl fun m hm => ?_)
rw [mem_filter, mem_range] at hm
rw [← mul_div_assoc, ← pow_add, add_tsub_cancel_of_le hm.2]
_ ≤ ∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, ‖x ^ n * (x ^ (m - n) / m.factorial)‖ :=
IsAbsoluteValue.abv_sum norm ..
_ ≤ ∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, ‖x‖ ^ n * (‖x‖ ^ (m - n) / (m - n).factorial) := by
simp_rw [Complex.norm_mul, Complex.norm_pow, Complex.norm_div, norm_natCast]
gcongr with i hi
· rw [Complex.norm_pow]
· simp
_ = ‖x‖ ^ n * ∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (‖x‖ ^ (m - n) / (m - n).factorial) := by
rw [← mul_sum]
_ = ‖x‖ ^ n * ∑ m ∈ range (j - n), (‖x‖ ^ m / m.factorial) := by
congr 1
refine (sum_bij (fun m hm ↦ m + n) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_).symm
· intro a ha
simp only [mem_filter, mem_range, le_add_iff_nonneg_left, zero_le, and_true]
simp only [mem_range] at ha
rwa [← lt_tsub_iff_right]
· intro a ha b hb hab
simpa using hab
· intro b hb
simp only [mem_range, exists_prop]
simp only [mem_filter, mem_range] at hb
refine ⟨b - n, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [tsub_lt_tsub_iff_right hb.2]
exact hb.1
· rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le hb.2]
· simp
_ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ n * Real.exp ‖x‖ := by
gcongr
refine Real.sum_le_exp_of_nonneg ?_ _
exact norm_nonneg _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_exp_sub_one_le := norm_exp_sub_one_le
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_exp_sub_one_sub_id_le := norm_exp_sub_one_sub_id_le
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_exp_sub_sum_le_exp_abs_sub_sum :=
norm_exp_sub_sum_le_exp_norm_sub_sum
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_exp_le_exp_abs := norm_exp_le_exp_norm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_exp_sub_sum_le_abs_mul_exp :=
norm_exp_sub_sum_le_norm_mul_exp
end Complex
namespace Real
open Complex Finset
nonrec theorem exp_bound {x : ℝ} (hx : |x| ≤ 1) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
|exp x - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial| ≤ |x| ^ n * (n.succ / (n.factorial * n)) := by
have hxc : ‖(x : ℂ)‖ ≤ 1 := mod_cast hx
convert exp_bound hxc hn using 2 <;>
norm_cast
theorem exp_bound' {x : ℝ} (h1 : 0 ≤ x) (h2 : x ≤ 1) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
Real.exp x ≤ (∑ m ∈ Finset.range n, x ^ m / m.factorial) +
x ^ n * (n + 1) / (n.factorial * n) := by
have h3 : |x| = x := by simpa
have h4 : |x| ≤ 1 := by rwa [h3]
have h' := Real.exp_bound h4 hn
rw [h3] at h'
have h'' := (abs_sub_le_iff.1 h').1
have t := sub_le_iff_le_add'.1 h''
simpa [mul_div_assoc] using t
theorem abs_exp_sub_one_le {x : ℝ} (hx : |x| ≤ 1) : |exp x - 1| ≤ 2 * |x| := by
have : ‖(x : ℂ)‖ ≤ 1 := mod_cast hx
exact_mod_cast Complex.norm_exp_sub_one_le (x := x) this
theorem abs_exp_sub_one_sub_id_le {x : ℝ} (hx : |x| ≤ 1) : |exp x - 1 - x| ≤ x ^ 2 := by
rw [← sq_abs]
have : ‖(x : ℂ)‖ ≤ 1 := mod_cast hx
exact_mod_cast Complex.norm_exp_sub_one_sub_id_le this
/-- A finite initial segment of the exponential series, followed by an arbitrary tail.
For fixed `n` this is just a linear map wrt `r`, and each map is a simple linear function
of the previous (see `expNear_succ`), with `expNear n x r ⟶ exp x` as `n ⟶ ∞`,
for any `r`. -/
noncomputable def expNear (n : ℕ) (x r : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial) + x ^ n / n.factorial * r
@[simp]
theorem expNear_zero (x r) : expNear 0 x r = r := by simp [expNear]
@[simp]
theorem expNear_succ (n x r) : expNear (n + 1) x r = expNear n x (1 + x / (n + 1) * r) := by
simp [expNear, range_succ, mul_add, add_left_comm, add_assoc, pow_succ, div_eq_mul_inv,
mul_inv, Nat.factorial]
ac_rfl
theorem expNear_sub (n x r₁ r₂) : expNear n x r₁ -
expNear n x r₂ = x ^ n / n.factorial * (r₁ - r₂) := by
simp [expNear, mul_sub]
theorem exp_approx_end (n m : ℕ) (x : ℝ) (e₁ : n + 1 = m) (h : |x| ≤ 1) :
|exp x - expNear m x 0| ≤ |x| ^ m / m.factorial * ((m + 1) / m) := by
simp only [expNear, mul_zero, add_zero]
convert exp_bound (n := m) h ?_ using 1
· field_simp [mul_comm]
· omega
theorem exp_approx_succ {n} {x a₁ b₁ : ℝ} (m : ℕ) (e₁ : n + 1 = m) (a₂ b₂ : ℝ)
(e : |1 + x / m * a₂ - a₁| ≤ b₁ - |x| / m * b₂)
(h : |exp x - expNear m x a₂| ≤ |x| ^ m / m.factorial * b₂) :
|exp x - expNear n x a₁| ≤ |x| ^ n / n.factorial * b₁ := by
refine (abs_sub_le _ _ _).trans ((add_le_add_right h _).trans ?_)
subst e₁; rw [expNear_succ, expNear_sub, abs_mul]
convert mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (a := |x| ^ n / ↑(Nat.factorial n))
(le_sub_iff_add_le'.1 e) ?_ using 1
· simp [mul_add, pow_succ', div_eq_mul_inv, abs_mul, abs_inv, ← pow_abs, mul_inv, Nat.factorial]
ac_rfl
· simp [div_nonneg, abs_nonneg]
theorem exp_approx_end' {n} {x a b : ℝ} (m : ℕ) (e₁ : n + 1 = m) (rm : ℝ) (er : ↑m = rm)
(h : |x| ≤ 1) (e : |1 - a| ≤ b - |x| / rm * ((rm + 1) / rm)) :
|exp x - expNear n x a| ≤ |x| ^ n / n.factorial * b := by
subst er
exact exp_approx_succ _ e₁ _ _ (by simpa using e) (exp_approx_end _ _ _ e₁ h)
theorem exp_1_approx_succ_eq {n} {a₁ b₁ : ℝ} {m : ℕ} (en : n + 1 = m) {rm : ℝ} (er : ↑m = rm)
(h : |exp 1 - expNear m 1 ((a₁ - 1) * rm)| ≤ |1| ^ m / m.factorial * (b₁ * rm)) :
|exp 1 - expNear n 1 a₁| ≤ |1| ^ n / n.factorial * b₁ := by
subst er
refine exp_approx_succ _ en _ _ ?_ h
field_simp [show (m : ℝ) ≠ 0 by norm_cast; omega]
theorem exp_approx_start (x a b : ℝ) (h : |exp x - expNear 0 x a| ≤ |x| ^ 0 / Nat.factorial 0 * b) :
|exp x - a| ≤ b := by simpa using h
theorem exp_bound_div_one_sub_of_interval' {x : ℝ} (h1 : 0 < x) (h2 : x < 1) :
Real.exp x < 1 / (1 - x) := by
have H : 0 < 1 - (1 + x + x ^ 2) * (1 - x) := calc
0 < x ^ 3 := by positivity
_ = 1 - (1 + x + x ^ 2) * (1 - x) := by ring
calc
exp x ≤ _ := exp_bound' h1.le h2.le zero_lt_three
_ ≤ 1 + x + x ^ 2 := by
-- Porting note: was `norm_num [Finset.sum] <;> nlinarith`
-- This proof should be restored after the norm_num plugin for big operators is ported.
-- (It may also need the positivity extensions in https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/3907.)
rw [show 3 = 1 + 1 + 1 from rfl]
repeat rw [Finset.sum_range_succ]
norm_num [Nat.factorial]
nlinarith
_ < 1 / (1 - x) := by rw [lt_div_iff₀] <;> nlinarith
theorem exp_bound_div_one_sub_of_interval {x : ℝ} (h1 : 0 ≤ x) (h2 : x < 1) :
Real.exp x ≤ 1 / (1 - x) := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le h1 with (rfl | h1)
· simp
· exact (exp_bound_div_one_sub_of_interval' h1 h2).le
theorem add_one_lt_exp {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : x + 1 < Real.exp x := by
obtain hx | hx := hx.symm.lt_or_lt
· exact add_one_lt_exp_of_pos hx
obtain h' | h' := le_or_lt 1 (-x)
· linarith [x.exp_pos]
have hx' : 0 < x + 1 := by linarith
simpa [add_comm, exp_neg, inv_lt_inv₀ (exp_pos _) hx']
using exp_bound_div_one_sub_of_interval' (neg_pos.2 hx) h'
theorem add_one_le_exp (x : ℝ) : x + 1 ≤ Real.exp x := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· simp
· exact (add_one_lt_exp hx).le
lemma one_sub_lt_exp_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : 1 - x < exp (-x) :=
(sub_eq_neg_add _ _).trans_lt <| add_one_lt_exp <| neg_ne_zero.2 hx
lemma one_sub_le_exp_neg (x : ℝ) : 1 - x ≤ exp (-x) :=
(sub_eq_neg_add _ _).trans_le <| add_one_le_exp _
theorem one_sub_div_pow_le_exp_neg {n : ℕ} {t : ℝ} (ht' : t ≤ n) : (1 - t / n) ^ n ≤ exp (-t) := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
rwa [Nat.cast_zero] at ht'
calc
(1 - t / n) ^ n ≤ rexp (-(t / n)) ^ n := by
gcongr
· exact sub_nonneg.2 <| div_le_one_of_le₀ ht' n.cast_nonneg
· exact one_sub_le_exp_neg _
_ = rexp (-t) := by rw [← Real.exp_nat_mul, mul_neg, mul_comm, div_mul_cancel₀]; positivity
lemma le_inv_mul_exp (x : ℝ) {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 < c) : x ≤ c⁻¹ * exp (c * x) := by
rw [le_inv_mul_iff₀ hc]
calc c * x
_ ≤ c * x + 1 := le_add_of_nonneg_right zero_le_one
_ ≤ _ := Real.add_one_le_exp (c * x)
end Real
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean.Meta Qq
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: `Real.exp` is always positive. -/
@[positivity Real.exp _]
def evalExp : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _ _ e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(Real.exp $a) =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.positive q(Real.exp_pos $a))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not Real.exp"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
namespace Complex
@[simp]
theorem norm_exp_ofReal (x : ℝ) : ‖exp x‖ = Real.exp x := by
rw [← ofReal_exp]
exact Complex.norm_of_nonneg (le_of_lt (Real.exp_pos _))
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_exp_ofReal := norm_exp_ofReal
end Complex
| Mathlib/Data/Complex/Exponential.lean | 899 | 900 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.CliffordAlgebra.Grading
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Opposite
/-!
# Conjugations
This file defines the grade reversal and grade involution functions on multivectors, `reverse` and
`involute`.
Together, these operations compose to form the "Clifford conjugate", hence the name of this file.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clifford_algebra#Antiautomorphisms
## Main definitions
* `CliffordAlgebra.involute`: the grade involution, negating each basis vector
* `CliffordAlgebra.reverse`: the grade reversion, reversing the order of a product of vectors
## Main statements
* `CliffordAlgebra.involute_involutive`
* `CliffordAlgebra.reverse_involutive`
* `CliffordAlgebra.reverse_involute_commute`
* `CliffordAlgebra.involute_mem_evenOdd_iff`
* `CliffordAlgebra.reverse_mem_evenOdd_iff`
-/
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable {Q : QuadraticForm R M}
namespace CliffordAlgebra
section Involute
/-- Grade involution, inverting the sign of each basis vector. -/
def involute : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q :=
CliffordAlgebra.lift Q ⟨-ι Q, fun m => by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem involute_ι (m : M) : involute (ι Q m) = -ι Q m :=
lift_ι_apply _ _ m
@[simp]
theorem involute_comp_involute : involute.comp involute = AlgHom.id R (CliffordAlgebra Q) := by
ext; simp
theorem involute_involutive : Function.Involutive (involute : _ → CliffordAlgebra Q) :=
AlgHom.congr_fun involute_comp_involute
@[simp]
theorem involute_involute : ∀ a : CliffordAlgebra Q, involute (involute a) = a :=
involute_involutive
/-- `CliffordAlgebra.involute` as an `AlgEquiv`. -/
@[simps!]
def involuteEquiv : CliffordAlgebra Q ≃ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q :=
AlgEquiv.ofAlgHom involute involute (AlgHom.ext <| involute_involute)
(AlgHom.ext <| involute_involute)
end Involute
section Reverse
open MulOpposite
/-- `CliffordAlgebra.reverse` as an `AlgHom` to the opposite algebra -/
def reverseOp : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] (CliffordAlgebra Q)ᵐᵒᵖ :=
CliffordAlgebra.lift Q
⟨(MulOpposite.opLinearEquiv R).toLinearMap ∘ₗ ι Q, fun m => unop_injective <| by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem reverseOp_ι (m : M) : reverseOp (ι Q m) = op (ι Q m) := lift_ι_apply _ _ _
/-- `CliffordAlgebra.reverseEquiv` as an `AlgEquiv` to the opposite algebra -/
@[simps! apply]
def reverseOpEquiv : CliffordAlgebra Q ≃ₐ[R] (CliffordAlgebra Q)ᵐᵒᵖ :=
AlgEquiv.ofAlgHom reverseOp (AlgHom.opComm reverseOp)
(AlgHom.unop.injective <| hom_ext <| LinearMap.ext fun _ => by simp)
(hom_ext <| LinearMap.ext fun _ => by simp)
@[simp]
theorem reverseOpEquiv_opComm :
AlgEquiv.opComm (reverseOpEquiv (Q := Q)) = reverseOpEquiv.symm := rfl
/-- Grade reversion, inverting the multiplication order of basis vectors.
Also called *transpose* in some literature. -/
def reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q :=
(opLinearEquiv R).symm.toLinearMap.comp reverseOp.toLinearMap
@[simp] theorem unop_reverseOp (x : CliffordAlgebra Q) : (reverseOp x).unop = reverse x := rfl
@[simp] theorem op_reverse (x : CliffordAlgebra Q) : op (reverse x) = reverseOp x := rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_ι (m : M) : reverse (ι Q m) = ι Q m := by simp [reverse]
@[simp]
theorem reverse.commutes (r : R) :
reverse (algebraMap R (CliffordAlgebra Q) r) = algebraMap R _ r :=
op_injective <| reverseOp.commutes r
@[simp]
protected theorem reverse.map_one : reverse (1 : CliffordAlgebra Q) = 1 :=
op_injective (map_one reverseOp)
@[simp]
protected theorem reverse.map_mul (a b : CliffordAlgebra Q) :
reverse (a * b) = reverse b * reverse a :=
op_injective (map_mul reverseOp a b)
@[simp]
theorem reverse_involutive : Function.Involutive (reverse (Q := Q)) :=
AlgHom.congr_fun reverseOpEquiv.symm_comp
@[simp]
theorem reverse_comp_reverse :
reverse.comp reverse = (LinearMap.id : _ →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) :=
LinearMap.ext reverse_involutive
@[simp]
theorem reverse_reverse : ∀ a : CliffordAlgebra Q, reverse (reverse a) = a :=
reverse_involutive
/-- `CliffordAlgebra.reverse` as a `LinearEquiv`. -/
@[simps!]
def reverseEquiv : CliffordAlgebra Q ≃ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q :=
LinearEquiv.ofInvolutive reverse reverse_involutive
theorem reverse_comp_involute :
reverse.comp involute.toLinearMap =
(involute.toLinearMap.comp reverse : _ →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) := by
ext x
simp only [LinearMap.comp_apply, AlgHom.toLinearMap_apply]
induction x using CliffordAlgebra.induction with
| algebraMap => simp
| ι => simp
| mul a b ha hb => simp only [ha, hb, reverse.map_mul, map_mul]
| add a b ha hb => simp only [ha, hb, reverse.map_add, map_add]
/-- `CliffordAlgebra.reverse` and `CliffordAlgebra.involute` commute. Note that the composition
is sometimes referred to as the "clifford conjugate". -/
theorem reverse_involute_commute : Function.Commute (reverse (Q := Q)) involute :=
LinearMap.congr_fun reverse_comp_involute
theorem reverse_involute :
∀ a : CliffordAlgebra Q, reverse (involute a) = involute (reverse a) :=
reverse_involute_commute
end Reverse
/-!
### Statements about conjugations of products of lists
-/
section List
/-- Taking the reverse of the product a list of $n$ vectors lifted via `ι` is equivalent to
taking the product of the reverse of that list. -/
theorem reverse_prod_map_ι :
∀ l : List M, reverse (l.map <| ι Q).prod = (l.map <| ι Q).reverse.prod
| [] => by simp
| x::xs => by simp [reverse_prod_map_ι xs]
/-- Taking the involute of the product a list of $n$ vectors lifted via `ι` is equivalent to
premultiplying by ${-1}^n$. -/
theorem involute_prod_map_ι :
∀ l : List M, involute (l.map <| ι Q).prod = (-1 : R) ^ l.length • (l.map <| ι Q).prod
| [] => by simp
| x::xs => by simp [pow_succ, involute_prod_map_ι xs]
end List
/-!
### Statements about `Submodule.map` and `Submodule.comap`
-/
section Submodule
variable (Q)
section Involute
theorem submodule_map_involute_eq_comap (p : Submodule R (CliffordAlgebra Q)) :
p.map (involute : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q).toLinearMap =
p.comap (involute : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q).toLinearMap :=
Submodule.map_equiv_eq_comap_symm involuteEquiv.toLinearEquiv _
@[simp]
theorem ι_range_map_involute :
(LinearMap.range (ι Q)).map (involute : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q).toLinearMap =
LinearMap.range (ι Q) :=
(ι_range_map_lift _ _).trans (LinearMap.range_neg _)
@[simp]
theorem ι_range_comap_involute :
(LinearMap.range (ι Q)).comap
(involute : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q).toLinearMap =
LinearMap.range (ι Q) := by
rw [← submodule_map_involute_eq_comap, ι_range_map_involute]
@[simp]
theorem evenOdd_map_involute (n : ZMod 2) :
(evenOdd Q n).map (involute : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q).toLinearMap =
evenOdd Q n := by
simp_rw [evenOdd, Submodule.map_iSup, Submodule.map_pow, ι_range_map_involute]
@[simp]
theorem evenOdd_comap_involute (n : ZMod 2) :
(evenOdd Q n).comap (involute : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q).toLinearMap =
evenOdd Q n := by
rw [← submodule_map_involute_eq_comap, evenOdd_map_involute]
end Involute
section Reverse
theorem submodule_map_reverse_eq_comap (p : Submodule R (CliffordAlgebra Q)) :
p.map (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) =
p.comap (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) :=
Submodule.map_equiv_eq_comap_symm (reverseEquiv : _ ≃ₗ[R] _) _
@[simp]
theorem ι_range_map_reverse :
(LinearMap.range (ι Q)).map (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q)
= LinearMap.range (ι Q) := by
rw [reverse, reverseOp, Submodule.map_comp, ι_range_map_lift, LinearMap.range_comp,
← Submodule.map_comp]
exact Submodule.map_id _
@[simp]
theorem ι_range_comap_reverse :
(LinearMap.range (ι Q)).comap (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q)
= LinearMap.range (ι Q) := by
rw [← submodule_map_reverse_eq_comap, ι_range_map_reverse]
/-- Like `Submodule.map_mul`, but with the multiplication reversed. -/
theorem submodule_map_mul_reverse (p q : Submodule R (CliffordAlgebra Q)) :
(p * q).map (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) =
q.map (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) *
p.map (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) := by
simp_rw [reverse, Submodule.map_comp, Submodule.map_mul, Submodule.map_unop_mul]
theorem submodule_comap_mul_reverse (p q : Submodule R (CliffordAlgebra Q)) :
(p * q).comap (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) =
q.comap (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) *
p.comap (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) := by
simp_rw [← submodule_map_reverse_eq_comap, submodule_map_mul_reverse]
/-- Like `Submodule.map_pow` -/
theorem submodule_map_pow_reverse (p : Submodule R (CliffordAlgebra Q)) (n : ℕ) :
(p ^ n).map (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) =
p.map (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) ^ n := by
simp_rw [reverse, Submodule.map_comp, Submodule.map_pow, Submodule.map_unop_pow]
theorem submodule_comap_pow_reverse (p : Submodule R (CliffordAlgebra Q)) (n : ℕ) :
(p ^ n).comap (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) =
p.comap (reverse : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q) ^ n := by
| simp_rw [← submodule_map_reverse_eq_comap, submodule_map_pow_reverse]
@[simp]
theorem evenOdd_map_reverse (n : ZMod 2) :
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/CliffordAlgebra/Conjugation.lean | 267 | 270 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Lattice.Fold
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pairwise.List
/-!
# Relations holding pairwise on finite sets
In this file we prove a few results about the interaction of `Set.PairwiseDisjoint` and `Finset`,
as well as the interaction of `List.Pairwise Disjoint` and the condition of
`Disjoint` on `List.toFinset`, in `Set` form.
-/
open Finset
variable {α ι ι' : Type*}
instance [DecidableEq α] {r : α → α → Prop} [DecidableRel r] {s : Finset α} :
Decidable ((s : Set α).Pairwise r) :=
decidable_of_iff' (∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ s, a ≠ b → r a b) Iff.rfl
theorem Finset.pairwiseDisjoint_range_singleton :
(Set.range (singleton : α → Finset α)).PairwiseDisjoint id := by
rintro _ ⟨a, rfl⟩ _ ⟨b, rfl⟩ h
exact disjoint_singleton.2 (ne_of_apply_ne _ h)
namespace Set
theorem PairwiseDisjoint.elim_finset {s : Set ι} {f : ι → Finset α} (hs : s.PairwiseDisjoint f)
{i j : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) (hj : j ∈ s) (a : α) (hai : a ∈ f i) (haj : a ∈ f j) : i = j :=
hs.elim hi hj (Finset.not_disjoint_iff.2 ⟨a, hai, haj⟩)
section SemilatticeInf
variable [SemilatticeInf α] [OrderBot α] {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → α}
theorem PairwiseDisjoint.image_finset_of_le [DecidableEq ι] {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → α}
(hs : (s : Set ι).PairwiseDisjoint f) {g : ι → ι} (hf : ∀ a, f (g a) ≤ f a) :
(s.image g : Set ι).PairwiseDisjoint f := by
rw [coe_image]
exact hs.image_of_le hf
theorem PairwiseDisjoint.attach (hs : (s : Set ι).PairwiseDisjoint f) :
(s.attach : Set { x // x ∈ s }).PairwiseDisjoint (f ∘ Subtype.val) := fun i _ j _ hij =>
hs i.2 j.2 <| mt Subtype.ext_val hij
end SemilatticeInf
variable [Lattice α] [OrderBot α]
/-- Bind operation for `Set.PairwiseDisjoint`. In a complete lattice, you can use
`Set.PairwiseDisjoint.biUnion`. -/
theorem PairwiseDisjoint.biUnion_finset {s : Set ι'} {g : ι' → Finset ι} {f : ι → α}
(hs : s.PairwiseDisjoint fun i' : ι' => (g i').sup f)
(hg : ∀ i ∈ s, (g i : Set ι).PairwiseDisjoint f) : (⋃ i ∈ s, ↑(g i)).PairwiseDisjoint f := by
rintro a ha b hb hab
simp_rw [Set.mem_iUnion] at ha hb
| obtain ⟨c, hc, ha⟩ := ha
obtain ⟨d, hd, hb⟩ := hb
obtain hcd | hcd := eq_or_ne (g c) (g d)
· exact hg d hd (by rwa [hcd] at ha) hb hab
· exact (hs hc hd (ne_of_apply_ne _ hcd)).mono (Finset.le_sup ha) (Finset.le_sup hb)
end Set
namespace List
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Pairwise.lean | 62 | 71 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Finsupp.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Preimage
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.BigOperators
/-!
# Miscellaneous definitions, lemmas, and constructions using finsupp
## Main declarations
* `Finsupp.graph`: the finset of input and output pairs with non-zero outputs.
* `Finsupp.mapRange.equiv`: `Finsupp.mapRange` as an equiv.
* `Finsupp.mapDomain`: maps the domain of a `Finsupp` by a function and by summing.
* `Finsupp.comapDomain`: postcomposition of a `Finsupp` with a function injective on the preimage
of its support.
* `Finsupp.some`: restrict a finitely supported function on `Option α` to a finitely supported
function on `α`.
* `Finsupp.filter`: `filter p f` is the finitely supported function that is `f a` if `p a` is true
and 0 otherwise.
* `Finsupp.frange`: the image of a finitely supported function on its support.
* `Finsupp.subtype_domain`: the restriction of a finitely supported function `f` to a subtype.
## Implementation notes
This file is a `noncomputable theory` and uses classical logic throughout.
## TODO
* This file is currently ~1600 lines long and is quite a miscellany of definitions and lemmas,
so it should be divided into smaller pieces.
* Expand the list of definitions and important lemmas to the module docstring.
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset Function
variable {α β γ ι M M' N P G H R S : Type*}
namespace Finsupp
/-! ### Declarations about `graph` -/
section Graph
variable [Zero M]
/-- The graph of a finitely supported function over its support, i.e. the finset of input and output
pairs with non-zero outputs. -/
def graph (f : α →₀ M) : Finset (α × M) :=
f.support.map ⟨fun a => Prod.mk a (f a), fun _ _ h => (Prod.mk.inj h).1⟩
theorem mk_mem_graph_iff {a : α} {m : M} {f : α →₀ M} : (a, m) ∈ f.graph ↔ f a = m ∧ m ≠ 0 := by
simp_rw [graph, mem_map, mem_support_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨b, ha, rfl, -⟩
exact ⟨rfl, ha⟩
· rintro ⟨rfl, ha⟩
exact ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_graph_iff {c : α × M} {f : α →₀ M} : c ∈ f.graph ↔ f c.1 = c.2 ∧ c.2 ≠ 0 := by
cases c
exact mk_mem_graph_iff
theorem mk_mem_graph (f : α →₀ M) {a : α} (ha : a ∈ f.support) : (a, f a) ∈ f.graph :=
mk_mem_graph_iff.2 ⟨rfl, mem_support_iff.1 ha⟩
theorem apply_eq_of_mem_graph {a : α} {m : M} {f : α →₀ M} (h : (a, m) ∈ f.graph) : f a = m :=
(mem_graph_iff.1 h).1
@[simp 1100] -- Higher priority shortcut instance for `mem_graph_iff`.
theorem not_mem_graph_snd_zero (a : α) (f : α →₀ M) : (a, (0 : M)) ∉ f.graph := fun h =>
(mem_graph_iff.1 h).2.irrefl
@[simp]
theorem image_fst_graph [DecidableEq α] (f : α →₀ M) : f.graph.image Prod.fst = f.support := by
classical
simp only [graph, map_eq_image, image_image, Embedding.coeFn_mk, Function.comp_def, image_id']
theorem graph_injective (α M) [Zero M] : Injective (@graph α M _) := by
intro f g h
classical
have hsup : f.support = g.support := by rw [← image_fst_graph, h, image_fst_graph]
refine ext_iff'.2 ⟨hsup, fun x hx => apply_eq_of_mem_graph <| h.symm ▸ ?_⟩
exact mk_mem_graph _ (hsup ▸ hx)
@[simp]
theorem graph_inj {f g : α →₀ M} : f.graph = g.graph ↔ f = g :=
(graph_injective α M).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem graph_zero : graph (0 : α →₀ M) = ∅ := by simp [graph]
@[simp]
theorem graph_eq_empty {f : α →₀ M} : f.graph = ∅ ↔ f = 0 :=
(graph_injective α M).eq_iff' graph_zero
end Graph
end Finsupp
/-! ### Declarations about `mapRange` -/
section MapRange
namespace Finsupp
section Equiv
variable [Zero M] [Zero N] [Zero P]
/-- `Finsupp.mapRange` as an equiv. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapRange.equiv (f : M ≃ N) (hf : f 0 = 0) (hf' : f.symm 0 = 0) : (α →₀ M) ≃ (α →₀ N) where
toFun := (mapRange f hf : (α →₀ M) → α →₀ N)
invFun := (mapRange f.symm hf' : (α →₀ N) → α →₀ M)
left_inv x := by
rw [← mapRange_comp _ _ _ _] <;> simp_rw [Equiv.symm_comp_self]
· exact mapRange_id _
· rfl
right_inv x := by
rw [← mapRange_comp _ _ _ _] <;> simp_rw [Equiv.self_comp_symm]
· exact mapRange_id _
· rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.equiv_refl : mapRange.equiv (Equiv.refl M) rfl rfl = Equiv.refl (α →₀ M) :=
Equiv.ext mapRange_id
theorem mapRange.equiv_trans (f : M ≃ N) (hf : f 0 = 0) (hf') (f₂ : N ≃ P) (hf₂ : f₂ 0 = 0) (hf₂') :
(mapRange.equiv (f.trans f₂) (by rw [Equiv.trans_apply, hf, hf₂])
(by rw [Equiv.symm_trans_apply, hf₂', hf']) :
(α →₀ _) ≃ _) =
(mapRange.equiv f hf hf').trans (mapRange.equiv f₂ hf₂ hf₂') :=
Equiv.ext <| mapRange_comp f₂ hf₂ f hf ((congrArg f₂ hf).trans hf₂)
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.equiv_symm (f : M ≃ N) (hf hf') :
((mapRange.equiv f hf hf').symm : (α →₀ _) ≃ _) = mapRange.equiv f.symm hf' hf :=
Equiv.ext fun _ => rfl
end Equiv
section ZeroHom
variable [Zero M] [Zero N] [Zero P]
/-- Composition with a fixed zero-preserving homomorphism is itself a zero-preserving homomorphism
on functions. -/
@[simps]
def mapRange.zeroHom (f : ZeroHom M N) : ZeroHom (α →₀ M) (α →₀ N) where
toFun := (mapRange f f.map_zero : (α →₀ M) → α →₀ N)
map_zero' := mapRange_zero
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.zeroHom_id : mapRange.zeroHom (ZeroHom.id M) = ZeroHom.id (α →₀ M) :=
ZeroHom.ext mapRange_id
theorem mapRange.zeroHom_comp (f : ZeroHom N P) (f₂ : ZeroHom M N) :
(mapRange.zeroHom (f.comp f₂) : ZeroHom (α →₀ _) _) =
(mapRange.zeroHom f).comp (mapRange.zeroHom f₂) :=
ZeroHom.ext <| mapRange_comp f (map_zero f) f₂ (map_zero f₂) (by simp only [comp_apply, map_zero])
end ZeroHom
section AddMonoidHom
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid N] [AddCommMonoid P]
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F M N] [AddMonoidHomClass F M N]
/-- Composition with a fixed additive homomorphism is itself an additive homomorphism on functions.
-/
@[simps]
def mapRange.addMonoidHom (f : M →+ N) : (α →₀ M) →+ α →₀ N where
toFun := (mapRange f f.map_zero : (α →₀ M) → α →₀ N)
map_zero' := mapRange_zero
-- Porting note: need either `dsimp only` or to specify `hf`:
-- see also: https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129
map_add' := mapRange_add (hf := f.map_zero) f.map_add
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.addMonoidHom_id :
mapRange.addMonoidHom (AddMonoidHom.id M) = AddMonoidHom.id (α →₀ M) :=
AddMonoidHom.ext mapRange_id
theorem mapRange.addMonoidHom_comp (f : N →+ P) (f₂ : M →+ N) :
(mapRange.addMonoidHom (f.comp f₂) : (α →₀ _) →+ _) =
(mapRange.addMonoidHom f).comp (mapRange.addMonoidHom f₂) :=
AddMonoidHom.ext <|
mapRange_comp f (map_zero f) f₂ (map_zero f₂) (by simp only [comp_apply, map_zero])
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.addMonoidHom_toZeroHom (f : M →+ N) :
(mapRange.addMonoidHom f).toZeroHom = (mapRange.zeroHom f.toZeroHom : ZeroHom (α →₀ _) _) :=
ZeroHom.ext fun _ => rfl
theorem mapRange_multiset_sum (f : F) (m : Multiset (α →₀ M)) :
mapRange f (map_zero f) m.sum = (m.map fun x => mapRange f (map_zero f) x).sum :=
(mapRange.addMonoidHom (f : M →+ N) : (α →₀ _) →+ _).map_multiset_sum _
theorem mapRange_finset_sum (f : F) (s : Finset ι) (g : ι → α →₀ M) :
mapRange f (map_zero f) (∑ x ∈ s, g x) = ∑ x ∈ s, mapRange f (map_zero f) (g x) :=
map_sum (mapRange.addMonoidHom (f : M →+ N)) _ _
/-- `Finsupp.mapRange.AddMonoidHom` as an equiv. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapRange.addEquiv (f : M ≃+ N) : (α →₀ M) ≃+ (α →₀ N) :=
{ mapRange.addMonoidHom f.toAddMonoidHom with
toFun := (mapRange f f.map_zero : (α →₀ M) → α →₀ N)
invFun := (mapRange f.symm f.symm.map_zero : (α →₀ N) → α →₀ M)
left_inv := fun x => by
rw [← mapRange_comp _ _ _ _] <;> simp_rw [AddEquiv.symm_comp_self]
· exact mapRange_id _
· rfl
right_inv := fun x => by
rw [← mapRange_comp _ _ _ _] <;> simp_rw [AddEquiv.self_comp_symm]
· exact mapRange_id _
· rfl }
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.addEquiv_refl : mapRange.addEquiv (AddEquiv.refl M) = AddEquiv.refl (α →₀ M) :=
AddEquiv.ext mapRange_id
theorem mapRange.addEquiv_trans (f : M ≃+ N) (f₂ : N ≃+ P) :
(mapRange.addEquiv (f.trans f₂) : (α →₀ M) ≃+ (α →₀ P)) =
(mapRange.addEquiv f).trans (mapRange.addEquiv f₂) :=
AddEquiv.ext (mapRange_comp _ f₂.map_zero _ f.map_zero (by simp))
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.addEquiv_symm (f : M ≃+ N) :
((mapRange.addEquiv f).symm : (α →₀ _) ≃+ _) = mapRange.addEquiv f.symm :=
AddEquiv.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.addEquiv_toAddMonoidHom (f : M ≃+ N) :
((mapRange.addEquiv f : (α →₀ _) ≃+ _) : _ →+ _) =
(mapRange.addMonoidHom f.toAddMonoidHom : (α →₀ _) →+ _) :=
AddMonoidHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.addEquiv_toEquiv (f : M ≃+ N) :
↑(mapRange.addEquiv f : (α →₀ _) ≃+ _) =
(mapRange.equiv (f : M ≃ N) f.map_zero f.symm.map_zero : (α →₀ _) ≃ _) :=
Equiv.ext fun _ => rfl
end AddMonoidHom
end Finsupp
end MapRange
/-! ### Declarations about `equivCongrLeft` -/
section EquivCongrLeft
variable [Zero M]
namespace Finsupp
/-- Given `f : α ≃ β`, we can map `l : α →₀ M` to `equivMapDomain f l : β →₀ M` (computably)
by mapping the support forwards and the function backwards. -/
def equivMapDomain (f : α ≃ β) (l : α →₀ M) : β →₀ M where
support := l.support.map f.toEmbedding
toFun a := l (f.symm a)
mem_support_toFun a := by simp only [Finset.mem_map_equiv, mem_support_toFun]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem equivMapDomain_apply (f : α ≃ β) (l : α →₀ M) (b : β) :
equivMapDomain f l b = l (f.symm b) :=
rfl
theorem equivMapDomain_symm_apply (f : α ≃ β) (l : β →₀ M) (a : α) :
equivMapDomain f.symm l a = l (f a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem equivMapDomain_refl (l : α →₀ M) : equivMapDomain (Equiv.refl _) l = l := by ext x; rfl
theorem equivMapDomain_refl' : equivMapDomain (Equiv.refl _) = @id (α →₀ M) := by ext x; rfl
theorem equivMapDomain_trans (f : α ≃ β) (g : β ≃ γ) (l : α →₀ M) :
equivMapDomain (f.trans g) l = equivMapDomain g (equivMapDomain f l) := by ext x; rfl
theorem equivMapDomain_trans' (f : α ≃ β) (g : β ≃ γ) :
@equivMapDomain _ _ M _ (f.trans g) = equivMapDomain g ∘ equivMapDomain f := by ext x; rfl
@[simp]
theorem equivMapDomain_single (f : α ≃ β) (a : α) (b : M) :
equivMapDomain f (single a b) = single (f a) b := by
classical
ext x
simp only [single_apply, Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply, equivMapDomain_apply]
@[simp]
theorem equivMapDomain_zero {f : α ≃ β} : equivMapDomain f (0 : α →₀ M) = (0 : β →₀ M) := by
ext; simp only [equivMapDomain_apply, coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_equivMapDomain [CommMonoid N] (f : α ≃ β) (l : α →₀ M) (g : β → M → N) :
prod (equivMapDomain f l) g = prod l (fun a m => g (f a) m) := by
simp [prod, equivMapDomain]
/-- Given `f : α ≃ β`, the finitely supported function spaces are also in bijection:
`(α →₀ M) ≃ (β →₀ M)`.
This is the finitely-supported version of `Equiv.piCongrLeft`. -/
def equivCongrLeft (f : α ≃ β) : (α →₀ M) ≃ (β →₀ M) := by
refine ⟨equivMapDomain f, equivMapDomain f.symm, fun f => ?_, fun f => ?_⟩ <;> ext x <;>
simp only [equivMapDomain_apply, Equiv.symm_symm, Equiv.symm_apply_apply,
Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
@[simp]
theorem equivCongrLeft_apply (f : α ≃ β) (l : α →₀ M) : equivCongrLeft f l = equivMapDomain f l :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem equivCongrLeft_symm (f : α ≃ β) :
(@equivCongrLeft _ _ M _ f).symm = equivCongrLeft f.symm :=
rfl
end Finsupp
end EquivCongrLeft
section CastFinsupp
variable [Zero M] (f : α →₀ M)
namespace Nat
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_finsuppProd [CommSemiring R] (g : α → M → ℕ) :
(↑(f.prod g) : R) = f.prod fun a b => ↑(g a b) :=
Nat.cast_prod _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-06")] alias cast_finsupp_prod := cast_finsuppProd
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_finsupp_sum [AddCommMonoidWithOne R] (g : α → M → ℕ) :
(↑(f.sum g) : R) = f.sum fun a b => ↑(g a b) :=
Nat.cast_sum _ _
end Nat
namespace Int
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_finsuppProd [CommRing R] (g : α → M → ℤ) :
(↑(f.prod g) : R) = f.prod fun a b => ↑(g a b) :=
Int.cast_prod _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-06")] alias cast_finsupp_prod := cast_finsuppProd
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_finsupp_sum [AddCommGroupWithOne R] (g : α → M → ℤ) :
(↑(f.sum g) : R) = f.sum fun a b => ↑(g a b) :=
Int.cast_sum _ _
end Int
namespace Rat
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_finsupp_sum [DivisionRing R] [CharZero R] (g : α → M → ℚ) :
(↑(f.sum g) : R) = f.sum fun a b => ↑(g a b) :=
cast_sum _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_finsuppProd [Field R] [CharZero R] (g : α → M → ℚ) :
(↑(f.prod g) : R) = f.prod fun a b => ↑(g a b) :=
cast_prod _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-06")] alias cast_finsupp_prod := cast_finsuppProd
end Rat
end CastFinsupp
/-! ### Declarations about `mapDomain` -/
namespace Finsupp
section MapDomain
variable [AddCommMonoid M] {v v₁ v₂ : α →₀ M}
/-- Given `f : α → β` and `v : α →₀ M`, `mapDomain f v : β →₀ M`
is the finitely supported function whose value at `a : β` is the sum
of `v x` over all `x` such that `f x = a`. -/
def mapDomain (f : α → β) (v : α →₀ M) : β →₀ M :=
v.sum fun a => single (f a)
theorem mapDomain_apply {f : α → β} (hf : Function.Injective f) (x : α →₀ M) (a : α) :
mapDomain f x (f a) = x a := by
rw [mapDomain, sum_apply, sum_eq_single a, single_eq_same]
· intro b _ hba
exact single_eq_of_ne (hf.ne hba)
· intro _
rw [single_zero, coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
theorem mapDomain_notin_range {f : α → β} (x : α →₀ M) (a : β) (h : a ∉ Set.range f) :
mapDomain f x a = 0 := by
rw [mapDomain, sum_apply, sum]
exact Finset.sum_eq_zero fun a' _ => single_eq_of_ne fun eq => h <| eq ▸ Set.mem_range_self _
@[simp]
theorem mapDomain_id : mapDomain id v = v :=
sum_single _
theorem mapDomain_comp {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} :
mapDomain (g ∘ f) v = mapDomain g (mapDomain f v) := by
refine ((sum_sum_index ?_ ?_).trans ?_).symm
· intro
exact single_zero _
· intro
exact single_add _
refine sum_congr fun _ _ => sum_single_index ?_
exact single_zero _
@[simp]
theorem mapDomain_single {f : α → β} {a : α} {b : M} : mapDomain f (single a b) = single (f a) b :=
sum_single_index <| single_zero _
@[simp]
theorem mapDomain_zero {f : α → β} : mapDomain f (0 : α →₀ M) = (0 : β →₀ M) :=
sum_zero_index
theorem mapDomain_congr {f g : α → β} (h : ∀ x ∈ v.support, f x = g x) :
v.mapDomain f = v.mapDomain g :=
Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ H => by simp only [h _ H]
theorem mapDomain_add {f : α → β} : mapDomain f (v₁ + v₂) = mapDomain f v₁ + mapDomain f v₂ :=
sum_add_index' (fun _ => single_zero _) fun _ => single_add _
@[simp]
theorem mapDomain_equiv_apply {f : α ≃ β} (x : α →₀ M) (a : β) :
mapDomain f x a = x (f.symm a) := by
conv_lhs => rw [← f.apply_symm_apply a]
exact mapDomain_apply f.injective _ _
/-- `Finsupp.mapDomain` is an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def mapDomain.addMonoidHom (f : α → β) : (α →₀ M) →+ β →₀ M where
toFun := mapDomain f
map_zero' := mapDomain_zero
map_add' _ _ := mapDomain_add
@[simp]
theorem mapDomain.addMonoidHom_id : mapDomain.addMonoidHom id = AddMonoidHom.id (α →₀ M) :=
AddMonoidHom.ext fun _ => mapDomain_id
theorem mapDomain.addMonoidHom_comp (f : β → γ) (g : α → β) :
(mapDomain.addMonoidHom (f ∘ g) : (α →₀ M) →+ γ →₀ M) =
(mapDomain.addMonoidHom f).comp (mapDomain.addMonoidHom g) :=
AddMonoidHom.ext fun _ => mapDomain_comp
theorem mapDomain_finset_sum {f : α → β} {s : Finset ι} {v : ι → α →₀ M} :
mapDomain f (∑ i ∈ s, v i) = ∑ i ∈ s, mapDomain f (v i) :=
map_sum (mapDomain.addMonoidHom f) _ _
theorem mapDomain_sum [Zero N] {f : α → β} {s : α →₀ N} {v : α → N → α →₀ M} :
mapDomain f (s.sum v) = s.sum fun a b => mapDomain f (v a b) :=
map_finsuppSum (mapDomain.addMonoidHom f : (α →₀ M) →+ β →₀ M) _ _
theorem mapDomain_support [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} {s : α →₀ M} :
(s.mapDomain f).support ⊆ s.support.image f :=
Finset.Subset.trans support_sum <|
Finset.Subset.trans (Finset.biUnion_mono fun _ _ => support_single_subset) <| by
rw [Finset.biUnion_singleton]
theorem mapDomain_apply' (S : Set α) {f : α → β} (x : α →₀ M) (hS : (x.support : Set α) ⊆ S)
(hf : Set.InjOn f S) {a : α} (ha : a ∈ S) : mapDomain f x (f a) = x a := by
classical
rw [mapDomain, sum_apply, sum]
simp_rw [single_apply]
by_cases hax : a ∈ x.support
· rw [← Finset.add_sum_erase _ _ hax, if_pos rfl]
convert add_zero (x a)
refine Finset.sum_eq_zero fun i hi => if_neg ?_
exact (hf.mono hS).ne (Finset.mem_of_mem_erase hi) hax (Finset.ne_of_mem_erase hi)
· rw [not_mem_support_iff.1 hax]
refine Finset.sum_eq_zero fun i hi => if_neg ?_
exact hf.ne (hS hi) ha (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hi hax)
theorem mapDomain_support_of_injOn [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (s : α →₀ M)
(hf : Set.InjOn f s.support) : (mapDomain f s).support = Finset.image f s.support :=
Finset.Subset.antisymm mapDomain_support <| by
intro x hx
simp only [mem_image, exists_prop, mem_support_iff, Ne] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨hx_w, hx_h_left, rfl⟩
simp only [mem_support_iff, Ne]
rw [mapDomain_apply' (↑s.support : Set _) _ _ hf]
· exact hx_h_left
· simp only [mem_coe, mem_support_iff, Ne]
exact hx_h_left
· exact Subset.refl _
theorem mapDomain_support_of_injective [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (hf : Function.Injective f)
(s : α →₀ M) : (mapDomain f s).support = Finset.image f s.support :=
mapDomain_support_of_injOn s hf.injOn
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_mapDomain_index [CommMonoid N] {f : α → β} {s : α →₀ M} {h : β → M → N}
(h_zero : ∀ b, h b 0 = 1) (h_add : ∀ b m₁ m₂, h b (m₁ + m₂) = h b m₁ * h b m₂) :
(mapDomain f s).prod h = s.prod fun a m => h (f a) m :=
(prod_sum_index h_zero h_add).trans <| prod_congr fun _ _ => prod_single_index (h_zero _)
-- Note that in `prod_mapDomain_index`, `M` is still an additive monoid,
-- so there is no analogous version in terms of `MonoidHom`.
/-- A version of `sum_mapDomain_index` that takes a bundled `AddMonoidHom`,
rather than separate linearity hypotheses.
-/
@[simp]
theorem sum_mapDomain_index_addMonoidHom [AddCommMonoid N] {f : α → β} {s : α →₀ M}
(h : β → M →+ N) : ((mapDomain f s).sum fun b m => h b m) = s.sum fun a m => h (f a) m :=
sum_mapDomain_index (fun b => (h b).map_zero) (fun b _ _ => (h b).map_add _ _)
theorem embDomain_eq_mapDomain (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) : embDomain f v = mapDomain f v := by
ext a
by_cases h : a ∈ Set.range f
· rcases h with ⟨a, rfl⟩
rw [mapDomain_apply f.injective, embDomain_apply]
· rw [mapDomain_notin_range, embDomain_notin_range] <;> assumption
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_mapDomain_index_inj [CommMonoid N] {f : α → β} {s : α →₀ M} {h : β → M → N}
(hf : Function.Injective f) : (s.mapDomain f).prod h = s.prod fun a b => h (f a) b := by
rw [← Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk f hf, ← embDomain_eq_mapDomain, prod_embDomain]
theorem mapDomain_injective {f : α → β} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (mapDomain f : (α →₀ M) → β →₀ M) := by
intro v₁ v₂ eq
ext a
have : mapDomain f v₁ (f a) = mapDomain f v₂ (f a) := by rw [eq]
rwa [mapDomain_apply hf, mapDomain_apply hf] at this
/-- When `f` is an embedding we have an embedding `(α →₀ ℕ) ↪ (β →₀ ℕ)` given by `mapDomain`. -/
@[simps]
def mapDomainEmbedding {α β : Type*} (f : α ↪ β) : (α →₀ ℕ) ↪ β →₀ ℕ :=
⟨Finsupp.mapDomain f, Finsupp.mapDomain_injective f.injective⟩
theorem mapDomain.addMonoidHom_comp_mapRange [AddCommMonoid N] (f : α → β) (g : M →+ N) :
(mapDomain.addMonoidHom f).comp (mapRange.addMonoidHom g) =
(mapRange.addMonoidHom g).comp (mapDomain.addMonoidHom f) := by
ext
simp only [AddMonoidHom.coe_comp, Finsupp.mapRange_single, Finsupp.mapDomain.addMonoidHom_apply,
Finsupp.singleAddHom_apply, eq_self_iff_true, Function.comp_apply, Finsupp.mapDomain_single,
Finsupp.mapRange.addMonoidHom_apply]
/-- When `g` preserves addition, `mapRange` and `mapDomain` commute. -/
theorem mapDomain_mapRange [AddCommMonoid N] (f : α → β) (v : α →₀ M) (g : M → N) (h0 : g 0 = 0)
(hadd : ∀ x y, g (x + y) = g x + g y) :
mapDomain f (mapRange g h0 v) = mapRange g h0 (mapDomain f v) :=
let g' : M →+ N :=
{ toFun := g
map_zero' := h0
map_add' := hadd }
DFunLike.congr_fun (mapDomain.addMonoidHom_comp_mapRange f g') v
theorem sum_update_add [AddZeroClass α] [AddCommMonoid β] (f : ι →₀ α) (i : ι) (a : α)
(g : ι → α → β) (hg : ∀ i, g i 0 = 0)
(hgg : ∀ (j : ι) (a₁ a₂ : α), g j (a₁ + a₂) = g j a₁ + g j a₂) :
(f.update i a).sum g + g i (f i) = f.sum g + g i a := by
rw [update_eq_erase_add_single, sum_add_index' hg hgg]
conv_rhs => rw [← Finsupp.update_self f i]
rw [update_eq_erase_add_single, sum_add_index' hg hgg, add_assoc, add_assoc]
congr 1
rw [add_comm, sum_single_index (hg _), sum_single_index (hg _)]
theorem mapDomain_injOn (S : Set α) {f : α → β} (hf : Set.InjOn f S) :
Set.InjOn (mapDomain f : (α →₀ M) → β →₀ M) { w | (w.support : Set α) ⊆ S } := by
intro v₁ hv₁ v₂ hv₂ eq
ext a
classical
by_cases h : a ∈ v₁.support ∪ v₂.support
· rw [← mapDomain_apply' S _ hv₁ hf _, ← mapDomain_apply' S _ hv₂ hf _, eq] <;>
· apply Set.union_subset hv₁ hv₂
exact mod_cast h
· simp only [not_or, mem_union, not_not, mem_support_iff] at h
simp [h]
theorem equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain {M} [AddCommMonoid M] (f : α ≃ β) (l : α →₀ M) :
equivMapDomain f l = mapDomain f l := by ext x; simp [mapDomain_equiv_apply]
end MapDomain
/-! ### Declarations about `comapDomain` -/
section ComapDomain
/-- Given `f : α → β`, `l : β →₀ M` and a proof `hf` that `f` is injective on
the preimage of `l.support`, `comapDomain f l hf` is the finitely supported function
from `α` to `M` given by composing `l` with `f`. -/
@[simps support]
def comapDomain [Zero M] (f : α → β) (l : β →₀ M) (hf : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑l.support)) :
α →₀ M where
support := l.support.preimage f hf
toFun a := l (f a)
mem_support_toFun := by
intro a
simp only [Finset.mem_def.symm, Finset.mem_preimage]
exact l.mem_support_toFun (f a)
@[simp]
theorem comapDomain_apply [Zero M] (f : α → β) (l : β →₀ M) (hf : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑l.support))
(a : α) : comapDomain f l hf a = l (f a) :=
rfl
theorem sum_comapDomain [Zero M] [AddCommMonoid N] (f : α → β) (l : β →₀ M) (g : β → M → N)
(hf : Set.BijOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑l.support) ↑l.support) :
(comapDomain f l hf.injOn).sum (g ∘ f) = l.sum g := by
simp only [sum, comapDomain_apply, (· ∘ ·), comapDomain]
exact Finset.sum_preimage_of_bij f _ hf fun x => g x (l x)
theorem eq_zero_of_comapDomain_eq_zero [Zero M] (f : α → β) (l : β →₀ M)
(hf : Set.BijOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑l.support) ↑l.support) : comapDomain f l hf.injOn = 0 → l = 0 := by
rw [← support_eq_empty, ← support_eq_empty, comapDomain]
simp only [Finset.ext_iff, Finset.not_mem_empty, iff_false, mem_preimage]
intro h a ha
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := hf.2.2 ha
exact h b (hb.2.symm ▸ ha)
section FInjective
section Zero
variable [Zero M]
lemma embDomain_comapDomain {f : α ↪ β} {g : β →₀ M} (hg : ↑g.support ⊆ Set.range f) :
embDomain f (comapDomain f g f.injective.injOn) = g := by
ext b
by_cases hb : b ∈ Set.range f
· obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := hb
rw [embDomain_apply, comapDomain_apply]
· replace hg : g b = 0 := not_mem_support_iff.mp <| mt (hg ·) hb
rw [embDomain_notin_range _ _ _ hb, hg]
/-- Note the `hif` argument is needed for this to work in `rw`. -/
@[simp]
theorem comapDomain_zero (f : α → β)
(hif : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑(0 : β →₀ M).support) := Finset.coe_empty ▸ (Set.injOn_empty f)) :
comapDomain f (0 : β →₀ M) hif = (0 : α →₀ M) := by
ext
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comapDomain_single (f : α → β) (a : α) (m : M)
(hif : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' (single (f a) m).support)) :
comapDomain f (Finsupp.single (f a) m) hif = Finsupp.single a m := by
rcases eq_or_ne m 0 with (rfl | hm)
· simp only [single_zero, comapDomain_zero]
· rw [eq_single_iff, comapDomain_apply, comapDomain_support, ← Finset.coe_subset, coe_preimage,
support_single_ne_zero _ hm, coe_singleton, coe_singleton, single_eq_same]
rw [support_single_ne_zero _ hm, coe_singleton] at hif
exact ⟨fun x hx => hif hx rfl hx, rfl⟩
end Zero
section AddZeroClass
variable [AddZeroClass M] {f : α → β}
theorem comapDomain_add (v₁ v₂ : β →₀ M) (hv₁ : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑v₁.support))
(hv₂ : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑v₂.support)) (hv₁₂ : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑(v₁ + v₂).support)) :
comapDomain f (v₁ + v₂) hv₁₂ = comapDomain f v₁ hv₁ + comapDomain f v₂ hv₂ := by
ext
simp only [comapDomain_apply, coe_add, Pi.add_apply]
/-- A version of `Finsupp.comapDomain_add` that's easier to use. -/
theorem comapDomain_add_of_injective (hf : Function.Injective f) (v₁ v₂ : β →₀ M) :
comapDomain f (v₁ + v₂) hf.injOn =
comapDomain f v₁ hf.injOn + comapDomain f v₂ hf.injOn :=
comapDomain_add _ _ _ _ _
/-- `Finsupp.comapDomain` is an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def comapDomain.addMonoidHom (hf : Function.Injective f) : (β →₀ M) →+ α →₀ M where
toFun x := comapDomain f x hf.injOn
map_zero' := comapDomain_zero f
map_add' := comapDomain_add_of_injective hf
end AddZeroClass
variable [AddCommMonoid M] (f : α → β)
theorem mapDomain_comapDomain (hf : Function.Injective f) (l : β →₀ M)
(hl : ↑l.support ⊆ Set.range f) :
mapDomain f (comapDomain f l hf.injOn) = l := by
conv_rhs => rw [← embDomain_comapDomain (f := ⟨f, hf⟩) hl (M := M), embDomain_eq_mapDomain]
rfl
end FInjective
end ComapDomain
/-! ### Declarations about finitely supported functions whose support is an `Option` type -/
section Option
/-- Restrict a finitely supported function on `Option α` to a finitely supported function on `α`. -/
def some [Zero M] (f : Option α →₀ M) : α →₀ M :=
f.comapDomain Option.some fun _ => by simp
@[simp]
theorem some_apply [Zero M] (f : Option α →₀ M) (a : α) : f.some a = f (Option.some a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem some_zero [Zero M] : (0 : Option α →₀ M).some = 0 := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem some_add [AddZeroClass M] (f g : Option α →₀ M) : (f + g).some = f.some + g.some := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem some_single_none [Zero M] (m : M) : (single none m : Option α →₀ M).some = 0 := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem some_single_some [Zero M] (a : α) (m : M) :
(single (Option.some a) m : Option α →₀ M).some = single a m := by
classical
ext b
simp [single_apply]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_option_index [AddZeroClass M] [CommMonoid N] (f : Option α →₀ M)
(b : Option α → M → N) (h_zero : ∀ o, b o 0 = 1)
(h_add : ∀ o m₁ m₂, b o (m₁ + m₂) = b o m₁ * b o m₂) :
f.prod b = b none (f none) * f.some.prod fun a => b (Option.some a) := by
classical
induction f using induction_linear with
| zero => simp [some_zero, h_zero]
| add f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂ =>
rw [Finsupp.prod_add_index, h₁, h₂, some_add, Finsupp.prod_add_index]
· simp only [h_add, Pi.add_apply, Finsupp.coe_add]
rw [mul_mul_mul_comm]
all_goals simp [h_zero, h_add]
| single a m => cases a <;> simp [h_zero, h_add]
theorem sum_option_index_smul [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] (f : Option α →₀ R)
(b : Option α → M) :
(f.sum fun o r => r • b o) = f none • b none + f.some.sum fun a r => r • b (Option.some a) :=
f.sum_option_index _ (fun _ => zero_smul _ _) fun _ _ _ => add_smul _ _ _
theorem eq_option_embedding_update_none_iff [Zero M] {n : Option α →₀ M} {m : α →₀ M} {i : M} :
(n = (embDomain Embedding.some m).update none i) ↔
n none = i ∧ n.some = m := by
classical
rw [Finsupp.ext_iff, Option.forall, Finsupp.ext_iff]
apply and_congr
· simp
· apply forall_congr'
intro
simp only [coe_update, ne_eq, reduceCtorEq, not_false_eq_true, update_of_ne, some_apply]
rw [← Embedding.some_apply, embDomain_apply, Embedding.some_apply]
@[simp] lemma some_embDomain_some [Zero M] (f : α →₀ M) : (f.embDomain .some).some = f := by
ext; rw [some_apply]; exact embDomain_apply _ _ _
@[simp] lemma embDomain_some_none [Zero M] (f : α →₀ M) : f.embDomain .some .none = 0 :=
embDomain_notin_range _ _ _ (by simp)
end Option
/-! ### Declarations about `Finsupp.filter` -/
section Filter
section Zero
variable [Zero M] (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (f : α →₀ M)
/--
`Finsupp.filter p f` is the finitely supported function that is `f a` if `p a` is true and `0`
otherwise. -/
def filter (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (f : α →₀ M) : α →₀ M where
toFun a := if p a then f a else 0
support := f.support.filter p
mem_support_toFun a := by
split_ifs with h <;>
· simp only [h, mem_filter, mem_support_iff]
tauto
theorem filter_apply (a : α) : f.filter p a = if p a then f a else 0 := rfl
theorem filter_eq_indicator : ⇑(f.filter p) = Set.indicator { x | p x } f := by
ext
simp [filter_apply, Set.indicator_apply]
theorem filter_eq_zero_iff : f.filter p = 0 ↔ ∀ x, p x → f x = 0 := by
simp only [DFunLike.ext_iff, filter_eq_indicator, zero_apply, Set.indicator_apply_eq_zero,
Set.mem_setOf_eq]
theorem filter_eq_self_iff : f.filter p = f ↔ ∀ x, f x ≠ 0 → p x := by
simp only [DFunLike.ext_iff, filter_eq_indicator, Set.indicator_apply_eq_self, Set.mem_setOf_eq,
not_imp_comm]
@[simp]
theorem filter_apply_pos {a : α} (h : p a) : f.filter p a = f a := if_pos h
@[simp]
theorem filter_apply_neg {a : α} (h : ¬p a) : f.filter p a = 0 := if_neg h
@[simp]
theorem support_filter : (f.filter p).support = {x ∈ f.support | p x} := rfl
theorem filter_zero : (0 : α →₀ M).filter p = 0 := by
classical rw [← support_eq_empty, support_filter, support_zero, Finset.filter_empty]
@[simp]
theorem filter_single_of_pos {a : α} {b : M} (h : p a) : (single a b).filter p = single a b :=
(filter_eq_self_iff _ _).2 fun _ hx => (single_apply_ne_zero.1 hx).1.symm ▸ h
@[simp]
theorem filter_single_of_neg {a : α} {b : M} (h : ¬p a) : (single a b).filter p = 0 :=
(filter_eq_zero_iff _ _).2 fun _ hpx =>
single_apply_eq_zero.2 fun hxa => absurd hpx (hxa.symm ▸ h)
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_filter_index [CommMonoid N] (g : α → M → N) :
(f.filter p).prod g = ∏ x ∈ (f.filter p).support, g x (f x) := by
classical
refine Finset.prod_congr rfl fun x hx => ?_
rw [support_filter, Finset.mem_filter] at hx
rw [filter_apply_pos _ _ hx.2]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not [CommMonoid N] (g : α → M → N) :
(f.filter p).prod g * (f.filter fun a => ¬p a).prod g = f.prod g := by
classical simp_rw [prod_filter_index, support_filter, Finset.prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not,
Finsupp.prod]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_div_prod_filter [CommGroup G] (g : α → M → G) :
f.prod g / (f.filter p).prod g = (f.filter fun a => ¬p a).prod g :=
div_eq_of_eq_mul' (prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not _ _ _).symm
end Zero
theorem filter_pos_add_filter_neg [AddZeroClass M] (f : α →₀ M) (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
(f.filter p + f.filter fun a => ¬p a) = f :=
DFunLike.coe_injective <| by
simp only [coe_add, filter_eq_indicator]
exact Set.indicator_self_add_compl { x | p x } f
end Filter
/-! ### Declarations about `frange` -/
section Frange
variable [Zero M]
/-- `frange f` is the image of `f` on the support of `f`. -/
def frange (f : α →₀ M) : Finset M :=
haveI := Classical.decEq M
Finset.image f f.support
theorem mem_frange {f : α →₀ M} {y : M} : y ∈ f.frange ↔ y ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ x, f x = y := by
rw [frange, @Finset.mem_image _ _ (Classical.decEq _) _ f.support]
exact ⟨fun ⟨x, hx1, hx2⟩ => ⟨hx2 ▸ mem_support_iff.1 hx1, x, hx2⟩, fun ⟨hy, x, hx⟩ =>
⟨x, mem_support_iff.2 (hx.symm ▸ hy), hx⟩⟩
theorem zero_not_mem_frange {f : α →₀ M} : (0 : M) ∉ f.frange := fun H => (mem_frange.1 H).1 rfl
theorem frange_single {x : α} {y : M} : frange (single x y) ⊆ {y} := fun r hr =>
let ⟨t, ht1, ht2⟩ := mem_frange.1 hr
ht2 ▸ by
classical
rw [single_apply] at ht2 ⊢
split_ifs at ht2 ⊢
· exact Finset.mem_singleton_self _
· exact (t ht2.symm).elim
end Frange
/-! ### Declarations about `Finsupp.subtypeDomain` -/
section SubtypeDomain
section Zero
variable [Zero M] {p : α → Prop}
/--
`subtypeDomain p f` is the restriction of the finitely supported function `f` to subtype `p`. -/
def subtypeDomain (p : α → Prop) (f : α →₀ M) : Subtype p →₀ M where
support :=
haveI := Classical.decPred p
f.support.subtype p
toFun := f ∘ Subtype.val
mem_support_toFun a := by simp only [@mem_subtype _ _ (Classical.decPred p), mem_support_iff]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_subtypeDomain [D : DecidablePred p] {f : α →₀ M} :
(subtypeDomain p f).support = f.support.subtype p := by rw [Subsingleton.elim D] <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem subtypeDomain_apply {a : Subtype p} {v : α →₀ M} : (subtypeDomain p v) a = v a.val :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem subtypeDomain_zero : subtypeDomain p (0 : α →₀ M) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem subtypeDomain_eq_iff_forall {f g : α →₀ M} :
f.subtypeDomain p = g.subtypeDomain p ↔ ∀ x, p x → f x = g x := by
simp_rw [DFunLike.ext_iff, subtypeDomain_apply, Subtype.forall]
theorem subtypeDomain_eq_iff {f g : α →₀ M}
(hf : ∀ x ∈ f.support, p x) (hg : ∀ x ∈ g.support, p x) :
f.subtypeDomain p = g.subtypeDomain p ↔ f = g :=
subtypeDomain_eq_iff_forall.trans
⟨fun H ↦ Finsupp.ext fun _a ↦ (em _).elim (H _ <| hf _ ·) fun haf ↦ (em _).elim (H _ <| hg _ ·)
fun hag ↦ (not_mem_support_iff.mp haf).trans (not_mem_support_iff.mp hag).symm,
fun H _ _ ↦ congr($H _)⟩
theorem subtypeDomain_eq_zero_iff' {f : α →₀ M} : f.subtypeDomain p = 0 ↔ ∀ x, p x → f x = 0 :=
subtypeDomain_eq_iff_forall (g := 0)
theorem subtypeDomain_eq_zero_iff {f : α →₀ M} (hf : ∀ x ∈ f.support, p x) :
f.subtypeDomain p = 0 ↔ f = 0 :=
subtypeDomain_eq_iff (g := 0) hf (by simp)
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_subtypeDomain_index [CommMonoid N] {v : α →₀ M} {h : α → M → N}
(hp : ∀ x ∈ v.support, p x) : (v.subtypeDomain p).prod (fun a b ↦ h a b) = v.prod h := by
refine Finset.prod_bij (fun p _ ↦ p) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> aesop
end Zero
section AddZeroClass
|
variable [AddZeroClass M] {p : α → Prop} {v v' : α →₀ M}
@[simp]
theorem subtypeDomain_add {v v' : α →₀ M} :
| Mathlib/Data/Finsupp/Basic.lean | 956 | 960 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Jujian Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jujian Zhang, Junyan Xu
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.ModuleCat.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.Grp.Injective
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.AddCircle
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Isomorphisms
/-!
# Character module of a module
For commutative ring `R` and an `R`-module `M` and an injective module `D`, its character module
`M⋆` is defined to be `R`-linear maps `M ⟶ D`.
`M⋆` also has an `R`-module structure given by `(r • f) m = f (r • m)`.
## Main results
- `CharacterModuleFunctor` : the contravariant functor of `R`-modules where `M ↦ M⋆` and
an `R`-linear map `l : M ⟶ N` induces an `R`-linear map `l⋆ : f ↦ f ∘ l` where `f : N⋆`.
- `LinearMap.dual_surjective_of_injective` : If `l` is injective then `l⋆` is surjective,
in another word taking character module as a functor sends monos to epis.
- `CharacterModule.homEquiv` : there is a bijection between linear map `Hom(N, M⋆)` and
`(N ⊗ M)⋆` given by `curry` and `uncurry`.
-/
open CategoryTheory
universe uR uA uB
variable (R : Type uR) [CommRing R]
variable (A : Type uA) [AddCommGroup A]
variable (A' : Type*) [AddCommGroup A']
variable (B : Type uB) [AddCommGroup B]
/--
The character module of an abelian group `A` in the unit rational circle is `A⋆ := Hom_ℤ(A, ℚ ⧸ ℤ)`.
-/
def CharacterModule : Type uA := A →+ AddCircle (1 : ℚ)
namespace CharacterModule
instance : FunLike (CharacterModule A) A (AddCircle (1 : ℚ)) where
coe c := c.toFun
coe_injective' _ _ _ := by aesop
instance : LinearMapClass (CharacterModule A) ℤ A (AddCircle (1 : ℚ)) where
map_add _ _ _ := by rw [AddMonoidHom.map_add]
map_smulₛₗ _ _ _ := by rw [AddMonoidHom.map_zsmul, RingHom.id_apply]
instance : AddCommGroup (CharacterModule A) :=
inferInstanceAs (AddCommGroup (A →+ _))
@[ext] theorem ext {c c' : CharacterModule A} (h : ∀ x, c x = c' x) : c = c' := DFunLike.ext _ _ h
section module
variable [Module R A] [Module R A'] [Module R B]
instance : Module R (CharacterModule A) :=
Module.compHom (A →+ _) (RingEquiv.toOpposite _ |>.toRingHom : R →+* Rᵈᵐᵃ)
variable {R A B}
@[simp] lemma smul_apply (c : CharacterModule A) (r : R) (a : A) : (r • c) a = c (r • a) := rfl
/--
Given an abelian group homomorphism `f : A → B`, `f⋆(L) := L ∘ f` defines a linear map
from `B⋆` to `A⋆`.
-/
@[simps] def dual (f : A →ₗ[R] B) : CharacterModule B →ₗ[R] CharacterModule A where
toFun L := L.comp f.toAddMonoidHom
map_add' := by aesop
map_smul' r c := by ext x; exact congr(c $(f.map_smul r x)).symm
@[simp]
lemma dual_zero : dual (0 : A →ₗ[R] B) = 0 := by
ext f
exact map_zero f
lemma dual_comp {C : Type*} [AddCommGroup C] [Module R C] (f : A →ₗ[R] B) (g : B →ₗ[R] C) :
dual (g.comp f) = (dual f).comp (dual g) := by
ext
rfl
lemma dual_injective_of_surjective (f : A →ₗ[R] B) (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
Function.Injective (dual f) := by
intro φ ψ eq
ext x
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := hf x
change (dual f) φ _ = (dual f) ψ _
rw [eq]
lemma dual_surjective_of_injective (f : A →ₗ[R] B) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Surjective (dual f) :=
(Module.Baer.of_divisible _).extension_property_addMonoidHom _ hf
/--
Two isomorphic modules have isomorphic character modules.
-/
def congr (e : A ≃ₗ[R] B) : CharacterModule A ≃ₗ[R] CharacterModule B :=
.ofLinear (dual e.symm) (dual e)
(by ext c _; exact congr(c $(e.right_inv _)))
(by ext c _; exact congr(c $(e.left_inv _)))
open TensorProduct
/--
Any linear map `L : A → B⋆` induces a character in `(A ⊗ B)⋆` by `a ⊗ b ↦ L a b`.
-/
@[simps] noncomputable def uncurry :
(A →ₗ[R] CharacterModule B) →ₗ[R] CharacterModule (A ⊗[R] B) where
toFun c := TensorProduct.liftAddHom c.toAddMonoidHom fun r a b ↦ congr($(c.map_smul r a) b)
map_add' c c' := DFunLike.ext _ _ fun x ↦ by refine x.induction_on ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> aesop
map_smul' r c := DFunLike.ext _ _ fun x ↦ x.induction_on
(by simp_rw [map_zero]) (fun a b ↦ congr($(c.map_smul r a) b).symm) (by aesop)
/--
Any character `c` in `(A ⊗ B)⋆` induces a linear map `A → B⋆` by `a ↦ b ↦ c (a ⊗ b)`.
-/
@[simps] noncomputable def curry :
CharacterModule (A ⊗[R] B) →ₗ[R] (A →ₗ[R] CharacterModule B) where
toFun c :=
{ toFun := (c.comp <| TensorProduct.mk R A B ·)
map_add' := fun _ _ ↦ DFunLike.ext _ _ fun b ↦
congr(c <| $(map_add (mk R A B) _ _) b).trans (c.map_add _ _)
map_smul' := fun r a ↦ by ext; exact congr(c $(TensorProduct.tmul_smul _ _ _)).symm }
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' r c := by ext; exact congr(c $(TensorProduct.tmul_smul _ _ _)).symm
/--
Linear maps into a character module are exactly characters of the tensor product.
-/
@[simps!] noncomputable def homEquiv :
| (A →ₗ[R] CharacterModule B) ≃ₗ[R] CharacterModule (A ⊗[R] B) :=
.ofLinear uncurry curry (by ext _ z; refine z.induction_on ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> aesop) (by aesop)
theorem dual_rTensor_conj_homEquiv (f : A →ₗ[R] A') :
homEquiv.symm.toLinearMap ∘ₗ dual (f.rTensor B) ∘ₗ homEquiv.toLinearMap = f.lcomp R _ := rfl
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/CharacterModule.lean | 139 | 144 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Computability.Halting
import Mathlib.Computability.TuringMachine
import Mathlib.Data.Num.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Tactic.DeriveFintype
import Mathlib.Computability.TMConfig
/-!
# Modelling partial recursive functions using Turing machines
The files `TMConfig` and `TMToPartrec` define a simplified basis for partial recursive functions,
and a `Turing.TM2` model
Turing machine for evaluating these functions. This amounts to a constructive proof that every
`Partrec` function can be evaluated by a Turing machine.
## Main definitions
* `PartrecToTM2.tr`: A TM2 turing machine which can evaluate `code` programs
-/
open List (Vector)
open Function (update)
open Relation
namespace Turing
/-!
## Simulating sequentialized partial recursive functions in TM2
At this point we have a sequential model of partial recursive functions: the `Cfg` type and
`step : Cfg → Option Cfg` function from `TMConfig.lean`. The key feature of this model is that
it does a finite amount of computation (in fact, an amount which is statically bounded by the size
of the program) between each step, and no individual step can diverge (unlike the compositional
semantics, where every sub-part of the computation is potentially divergent). So we can utilize the
same techniques as in the other TM simulations in `Computability.TuringMachine` to prove that
each step corresponds to a finite number of steps in a lower level model. (We don't prove it here,
but in anticipation of the complexity class P, the simulation is actually polynomial-time as well.)
The target model is `Turing.TM2`, which has a fixed finite set of stacks, a bit of local storage,
with programs selected from a potentially infinite (but finitely accessible) set of program
positions, or labels `Λ`, each of which executes a finite sequence of basic stack commands.
For this program we will need four stacks, each on an alphabet `Γ'` like so:
inductive Γ' | consₗ | cons | bit0 | bit1
We represent a number as a bit sequence, lists of numbers by putting `cons` after each element, and
lists of lists of natural numbers by putting `consₗ` after each list. For example:
0 ~> []
1 ~> [bit1]
6 ~> [bit0, bit1, bit1]
[1, 2] ~> [bit1, cons, bit0, bit1, cons]
[[], [1, 2]] ~> [consₗ, bit1, cons, bit0, bit1, cons, consₗ]
The four stacks are `main`, `rev`, `aux`, `stack`. In normal mode, `main` contains the input to the
current program (a `List ℕ`) and `stack` contains data (a `List (List ℕ)`) associated to the
current continuation, and in `ret` mode `main` contains the value that is being passed to the
continuation and `stack` contains the data for the continuation. The `rev` and `aux` stacks are
usually empty; `rev` is used to store reversed data when e.g. moving a value from one stack to
another, while `aux` is used as a temporary for a `main`/`stack` swap that happens during `cons₁`
evaluation.
The only local store we need is `Option Γ'`, which stores the result of the last pop
operation. (Most of our working data are natural numbers, which are too large to fit in the local
store.)
The continuations from the previous section are data-carrying, containing all the values that have
been computed and are awaiting other arguments. In order to have only a finite number of
continuations appear in the program so that they can be used in machine states, we separate the
data part (anything with type `List ℕ`) from the `Cont` type, producing a `Cont'` type that lacks
this information. The data is kept on the `stack` stack.
Because we want to have subroutines for e.g. moving an entire stack to another place, we use an
infinite inductive type `Λ'` so that we can execute a program and then return to do something else
without having to define too many different kinds of intermediate states. (We must nevertheless
prove that only finitely many labels are accessible.) The labels are:
* `move p k₁ k₂ q`: move elements from stack `k₁` to `k₂` while `p` holds of the value being moved.
The last element, that fails `p`, is placed in neither stack but left in the local store.
At the end of the operation, `k₂` will have the elements of `k₁` in reverse order. Then do `q`.
* `clear p k q`: delete elements from stack `k` until `p` is true. Like `move`, the last element is
left in the local storage. Then do `q`.
* `copy q`: Move all elements from `rev` to both `main` and `stack` (in reverse order),
then do `q`. That is, it takes `(a, b, c, d)` to `(b.reverse ++ a, [], c, b.reverse ++ d)`.
* `push k f q`: push `f s`, where `s` is the local store, to stack `k`, then do `q`. This is a
duplicate of the `push` instruction that is part of the TM2 model, but by having a subroutine
just for this purpose we can build up programs to execute inside a `goto` statement, where we
have the flexibility to be general recursive.
* `read (f : Option Γ' → Λ')`: go to state `f s` where `s` is the local store. Again this is only
here for convenience.
* `succ q`: perform a successor operation. Assuming `[n]` is encoded on `main` before,
`[n+1]` will be on main after. This implements successor for binary natural numbers.
* `pred q₁ q₂`: perform a predecessor operation or `case` statement. If `[]` is encoded on
`main` before, then we transition to `q₁` with `[]` on main; if `(0 :: v)` is on `main` before
then `v` will be on `main` after and we transition to `q₁`; and if `(n+1 :: v)` is on `main`
before then `n :: v` will be on `main` after and we transition to `q₂`.
* `ret k`: call continuation `k`. Each continuation has its own interpretation of the data in
`stack` and sets up the data for the next continuation.
* `ret (cons₁ fs k)`: `v :: KData` on `stack` and `ns` on `main`, and the next step expects
`v` on `main` and `ns :: KData` on `stack`. So we have to do a little dance here with six
reverse-moves using the `aux` stack to perform a three-point swap, each of which involves two
reversals.
* `ret (cons₂ k)`: `ns :: KData` is on `stack` and `v` is on `main`, and we have to put
`ns.headI :: v` on `main` and `KData` on `stack`. This is done using the `head` subroutine.
* `ret (fix f k)`: This stores no data, so we just check if `main` starts with `0` and
if so, remove it and call `k`, otherwise `clear` the first value and call `f`.
* `ret halt`: the stack is empty, and `main` has the output. Do nothing and halt.
In addition to these basic states, we define some additional subroutines that are used in the
above:
* `push'`, `peek'`, `pop'` are special versions of the builtins that use the local store to supply
inputs and outputs.
* `unrev`: special case `move false rev main` to move everything from `rev` back to `main`. Used as
a cleanup operation in several functions.
* `moveExcl p k₁ k₂ q`: same as `move` but pushes the last value read back onto the source stack.
* `move₂ p k₁ k₂ q`: double `move`, so that the result comes out in the right order at the target
stack. Implemented as `moveExcl p k rev; move false rev k₂`. Assumes that neither `k₁` nor `k₂`
is `rev` and `rev` is initially empty.
* `head k q`: get the first natural number from stack `k` and reverse-move it to `rev`, then clear
the rest of the list at `k` and then `unrev` to reverse-move the head value to `main`. This is
used with `k = main` to implement regular `head`, i.e. if `v` is on `main` before then `[v.headI]`
will be on `main` after; and also with `k = stack` for the `cons` operation, which has `v` on
`main` and `ns :: KData` on `stack`, and results in `KData` on `stack` and `ns.headI :: v` on
`main`.
* `trNormal` is the main entry point, defining states that perform a given `code` computation.
It mostly just dispatches to functions written above.
The main theorem of this section is `tr_eval`, which asserts that for each that for each code `c`,
the state `init c v` steps to `halt v'` in finitely many steps if and only if
`Code.eval c v = some v'`.
-/
namespace PartrecToTM2
section
open ToPartrec
/-- The alphabet for the stacks in the program. `bit0` and `bit1` are used to represent `ℕ` values
as lists of binary digits, `cons` is used to separate `List ℕ` values, and `consₗ` is used to
separate `List (List ℕ)` values. See the section documentation. -/
inductive Γ'
| consₗ
| cons
| bit0
| bit1
deriving DecidableEq, Inhabited, Fintype
/-- The four stacks used by the program. `main` is used to store the input value in `trNormal`
mode and the output value in `Λ'.ret` mode, while `stack` is used to keep all the data for the
continuations. `rev` is used to store reversed lists when transferring values between stacks, and
`aux` is only used once in `cons₁`. See the section documentation. -/
inductive K'
| main
| rev
| aux
| stack
deriving DecidableEq, Inhabited
open K'
/-- Continuations as in `ToPartrec.Cont` but with the data removed. This is done because we want
the set of all continuations in the program to be finite (so that it can ultimately be encoded into
the finite state machine of a Turing machine), but a continuation can handle a potentially infinite
number of data values during execution. -/
inductive Cont'
| halt
| cons₁ : Code → Cont' → Cont'
| cons₂ : Cont' → Cont'
| comp : Code → Cont' → Cont'
| fix : Code → Cont' → Cont'
deriving DecidableEq, Inhabited
/-- The set of program positions. We make extensive use of inductive types here to let us describe
"subroutines"; for example `clear p k q` is a program that clears stack `k`, then does `q` where
`q` is another label. In order to prevent this from resulting in an infinite number of distinct
accessible states, we are careful to be non-recursive (although loops are okay). See the section
documentation for a description of all the programs. -/
inductive Λ'
| move (p : Γ' → Bool) (k₁ k₂ : K') (q : Λ')
| clear (p : Γ' → Bool) (k : K') (q : Λ')
| copy (q : Λ')
| push (k : K') (s : Option Γ' → Option Γ') (q : Λ')
| read (f : Option Γ' → Λ')
| succ (q : Λ')
| pred (q₁ q₂ : Λ')
| ret (k : Cont')
compile_inductive% Code
compile_inductive% Cont'
compile_inductive% K'
compile_inductive% Λ'
instance Λ'.instInhabited : Inhabited Λ' :=
⟨Λ'.ret Cont'.halt⟩
instance Λ'.instDecidableEq : DecidableEq Λ' := fun a b => by
induction a generalizing b <;> cases b <;> first
| apply Decidable.isFalse; rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩; done
| exact decidable_of_iff' _ (by simp [funext_iff]; rfl)
/-- The type of TM2 statements used by this machine. -/
def Stmt' :=
TM2.Stmt (fun _ : K' => Γ') Λ' (Option Γ') deriving Inhabited
/-- The type of TM2 configurations used by this machine. -/
def Cfg' :=
TM2.Cfg (fun _ : K' => Γ') Λ' (Option Γ') deriving Inhabited
open TM2.Stmt
/-- A predicate that detects the end of a natural number, either `Γ'.cons` or `Γ'.consₗ` (or
implicitly the end of the list), for use in predicate-taking functions like `move` and `clear`. -/
@[simp]
def natEnd : Γ' → Bool
| Γ'.consₗ => true
| Γ'.cons => true
| _ => false
attribute [nolint simpNF] natEnd.eq_3
/-- Pop a value from the stack and place the result in local store. -/
@[simp]
def pop' (k : K') : Stmt' → Stmt' :=
pop k fun _ v => v
/-- Peek a value from the stack and place the result in local store. -/
@[simp]
def peek' (k : K') : Stmt' → Stmt' :=
peek k fun _ v => v
/-- Push the value in the local store to the given stack. -/
@[simp]
def push' (k : K') : Stmt' → Stmt' :=
push k fun x => x.iget
/-- Move everything from the `rev` stack to the `main` stack (reversed). -/
def unrev :=
Λ'.move (fun _ => false) rev main
/-- Move elements from `k₁` to `k₂` while `p` holds, with the last element being left on `k₁`. -/
def moveExcl (p k₁ k₂ q) :=
Λ'.move p k₁ k₂ <| Λ'.push k₁ id q
/-- Move elements from `k₁` to `k₂` without reversion, by performing a double move via the `rev`
stack. -/
def move₂ (p k₁ k₂ q) :=
moveExcl p k₁ rev <| Λ'.move (fun _ => false) rev k₂ q
/-- Assuming `trList v` is on the front of stack `k`, remove it, and push `v.headI` onto `main`.
See the section documentation. -/
def head (k : K') (q : Λ') : Λ' :=
Λ'.move natEnd k rev <|
(Λ'.push rev fun _ => some Γ'.cons) <|
Λ'.read fun s =>
(if s = some Γ'.consₗ then id else Λ'.clear (fun x => x = Γ'.consₗ) k) <| unrev q
/-- The program that evaluates code `c` with continuation `k`. This expects an initial state where
`trList v` is on `main`, `trContStack k` is on `stack`, and `aux` and `rev` are empty.
See the section documentation for details. -/
@[simp]
def trNormal : Code → Cont' → Λ'
| Code.zero', k => (Λ'.push main fun _ => some Γ'.cons) <| Λ'.ret k
| Code.succ, k => head main <| Λ'.succ <| Λ'.ret k
| Code.tail, k => Λ'.clear natEnd main <| Λ'.ret k
| Code.cons f fs, k =>
(Λ'.push stack fun _ => some Γ'.consₗ) <|
Λ'.move (fun _ => false) main rev <| Λ'.copy <| trNormal f (Cont'.cons₁ fs k)
| Code.comp f g, k => trNormal g (Cont'.comp f k)
| Code.case f g, k => Λ'.pred (trNormal f k) (trNormal g k)
| Code.fix f, k => trNormal f (Cont'.fix f k)
/-- The main program. See the section documentation for details. -/
def tr : Λ' → Stmt'
| Λ'.move p k₁ k₂ q =>
pop' k₁ <|
branch (fun s => s.elim true p) (goto fun _ => q)
(push' k₂ <| goto fun _ => Λ'.move p k₁ k₂ q)
| Λ'.push k f q =>
branch (fun s => (f s).isSome) ((push k fun s => (f s).iget) <| goto fun _ => q)
(goto fun _ => q)
| Λ'.read q => goto q
| Λ'.clear p k q =>
pop' k <| branch (fun s => s.elim true p) (goto fun _ => q) (goto fun _ => Λ'.clear p k q)
| Λ'.copy q =>
pop' rev <|
branch Option.isSome (push' main <| push' stack <| goto fun _ => Λ'.copy q) (goto fun _ => q)
| Λ'.succ q =>
pop' main <|
branch (fun s => s = some Γ'.bit1) ((push rev fun _ => Γ'.bit0) <| goto fun _ => Λ'.succ q) <|
branch (fun s => s = some Γ'.cons)
((push main fun _ => Γ'.cons) <| (push main fun _ => Γ'.bit1) <| goto fun _ => unrev q)
((push main fun _ => Γ'.bit1) <| goto fun _ => unrev q)
| Λ'.pred q₁ q₂ =>
pop' main <|
branch (fun s => s = some Γ'.bit0)
((push rev fun _ => Γ'.bit1) <| goto fun _ => Λ'.pred q₁ q₂) <|
branch (fun s => natEnd s.iget) (goto fun _ => q₁)
(peek' main <|
branch (fun s => natEnd s.iget) (goto fun _ => unrev q₂)
((push rev fun _ => Γ'.bit0) <| goto fun _ => unrev q₂))
| Λ'.ret (Cont'.cons₁ fs k) =>
goto fun _ =>
move₂ (fun _ => false) main aux <|
move₂ (fun s => s = Γ'.consₗ) stack main <|
move₂ (fun _ => false) aux stack <| trNormal fs (Cont'.cons₂ k)
| Λ'.ret (Cont'.cons₂ k) => goto fun _ => head stack <| Λ'.ret k
| Λ'.ret (Cont'.comp f k) => goto fun _ => trNormal f k
| Λ'.ret (Cont'.fix f k) =>
pop' main <|
goto fun s =>
cond (natEnd s.iget) (Λ'.ret k) <| Λ'.clear natEnd main <| trNormal f (Cont'.fix f k)
| Λ'.ret Cont'.halt => (load fun _ => none) <| halt
@[simp]
theorem tr_move (p k₁ k₂ q) : tr (Λ'.move p k₁ k₂ q) =
pop' k₁ (branch (fun s => s.elim true p) (goto fun _ => q)
(push' k₂ <| goto fun _ => Λ'.move p k₁ k₂ q)) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_push (k f q) : tr (Λ'.push k f q) = branch (fun s => (f s).isSome)
((push k fun s => (f s).iget) <| goto fun _ => q) (goto fun _ => q) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_read (q) : tr (Λ'.read q) = goto q := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_clear (p k q) : tr (Λ'.clear p k q) = pop' k (branch
(fun s => s.elim true p) (goto fun _ => q) (goto fun _ => Λ'.clear p k q)) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_copy (q) : tr (Λ'.copy q) = pop' rev (branch Option.isSome
(push' main <| push' stack <| goto fun _ => Λ'.copy q) (goto fun _ => q)) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_succ (q) : tr (Λ'.succ q) = pop' main (branch (fun s => s = some Γ'.bit1)
((push rev fun _ => Γ'.bit0) <| goto fun _ => Λ'.succ q) <|
branch (fun s => s = some Γ'.cons)
((push main fun _ => Γ'.cons) <| (push main fun _ => Γ'.bit1) <| goto fun _ => unrev q)
((push main fun _ => Γ'.bit1) <| goto fun _ => unrev q)) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_pred (q₁ q₂) : tr (Λ'.pred q₁ q₂) = pop' main (branch (fun s => s = some Γ'.bit0)
((push rev fun _ => Γ'.bit1) <| goto fun _ => Λ'.pred q₁ q₂) <|
branch (fun s => natEnd s.iget) (goto fun _ => q₁)
(peek' main <|
branch (fun s => natEnd s.iget) (goto fun _ => unrev q₂)
((push rev fun _ => Γ'.bit0) <| goto fun _ => unrev q₂))) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_ret_cons₁ (fs k) : tr (Λ'.ret (Cont'.cons₁ fs k)) = goto fun _ =>
move₂ (fun _ => false) main aux <|
move₂ (fun s => s = Γ'.consₗ) stack main <|
move₂ (fun _ => false) aux stack <| trNormal fs (Cont'.cons₂ k) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_ret_cons₂ (k) : tr (Λ'.ret (Cont'.cons₂ k)) =
goto fun _ => head stack <| Λ'.ret k := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_ret_comp (f k) : tr (Λ'.ret (Cont'.comp f k)) = goto fun _ => trNormal f k := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_ret_fix (f k) : tr (Λ'.ret (Cont'.fix f k)) = pop' main (goto fun s =>
cond (natEnd s.iget) (Λ'.ret k) <| Λ'.clear natEnd main <| trNormal f (Cont'.fix f k)) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_ret_halt : tr (Λ'.ret Cont'.halt) = (load fun _ => none) halt := rfl
/-- Translating a `Cont` continuation to a `Cont'` continuation simply entails dropping all the
data. This data is instead encoded in `trContStack` in the configuration. -/
def trCont : Cont → Cont'
| Cont.halt => Cont'.halt
| Cont.cons₁ c _ k => Cont'.cons₁ c (trCont k)
| Cont.cons₂ _ k => Cont'.cons₂ (trCont k)
| Cont.comp c k => Cont'.comp c (trCont k)
| Cont.fix c k => Cont'.fix c (trCont k)
/-- We use `PosNum` to define the translation of binary natural numbers. A natural number is
represented as a little-endian list of `bit0` and `bit1` elements:
1 = [bit1]
2 = [bit0, bit1]
3 = [bit1, bit1]
4 = [bit0, bit0, bit1]
In particular, this representation guarantees no trailing `bit0`'s at the end of the list. -/
def trPosNum : PosNum → List Γ'
| PosNum.one => [Γ'.bit1]
| PosNum.bit0 n => Γ'.bit0 :: trPosNum n
| PosNum.bit1 n => Γ'.bit1 :: trPosNum n
/-- We use `Num` to define the translation of binary natural numbers. Positive numbers are
translated using `trPosNum`, and `trNum 0 = []`. So there are never any trailing `bit0`'s in
a translated `Num`.
0 = []
1 = [bit1]
2 = [bit0, bit1]
3 = [bit1, bit1]
4 = [bit0, bit0, bit1]
-/
def trNum : Num → List Γ'
| Num.zero => []
| Num.pos n => trPosNum n
/-- Because we use binary encoding, we define `trNat` in terms of `trNum`, using `Num`, which are
binary natural numbers. (We could also use `Nat.binaryRecOn`, but `Num` and `PosNum` make for
easy inductions.) -/
def trNat (n : ℕ) : List Γ' :=
trNum n
@[simp]
theorem trNat_zero : trNat 0 = [] := by rw [trNat, Nat.cast_zero]; rfl
theorem trNat_default : trNat default = [] :=
trNat_zero
/-- Lists are translated with a `cons` after each encoded number.
For example:
[] = []
[0] = [cons]
[1] = [bit1, cons]
[6, 0] = [bit0, bit1, bit1, cons, cons]
-/
@[simp]
def trList : List ℕ → List Γ'
| [] => []
| n::ns => trNat n ++ Γ'.cons :: trList ns
/-- Lists of lists are translated with a `consₗ` after each encoded list.
For example:
[] = []
[[]] = [consₗ]
[[], []] = [consₗ, consₗ]
[[0]] = [cons, consₗ]
[[1, 2], [0]] = [bit1, cons, bit0, bit1, cons, consₗ, cons, consₗ]
-/
@[simp]
def trLList : List (List ℕ) → List Γ'
| [] => []
| l::ls => trList l ++ Γ'.consₗ :: trLList ls
/-- The data part of a continuation is a list of lists, which is encoded on the `stack` stack
using `trLList`. -/
@[simp]
def contStack : Cont → List (List ℕ)
| Cont.halt => []
| Cont.cons₁ _ ns k => ns :: contStack k
| Cont.cons₂ ns k => ns :: contStack k
| Cont.comp _ k => contStack k
| Cont.fix _ k => contStack k
/-- The data part of a continuation is a list of lists, which is encoded on the `stack` stack
using `trLList`. -/
def trContStack (k : Cont) :=
trLList (contStack k)
/-- This is the nondependent eliminator for `K'`, but we use it specifically here in order to
represent the stack data as four lists rather than as a function `K' → List Γ'`, because this makes
rewrites easier. The theorems `K'.elim_update_main` et. al. show how such a function is updated
after an `update` to one of the components. -/
def K'.elim (a b c d : List Γ') : K' → List Γ'
| K'.main => a
| K'.rev => b
| K'.aux => c
| K'.stack => d
-- The equation lemma of `elim` simplifies to `match` structures.
theorem K'.elim_main (a b c d) : K'.elim a b c d K'.main = a := rfl
theorem K'.elim_rev (a b c d) : K'.elim a b c d K'.rev = b := rfl
theorem K'.elim_aux (a b c d) : K'.elim a b c d K'.aux = c := rfl
theorem K'.elim_stack (a b c d) : K'.elim a b c d K'.stack = d := rfl
attribute [simp] K'.elim
@[simp]
theorem K'.elim_update_main {a b c d a'} : update (K'.elim a b c d) main a' = K'.elim a' b c d := by
funext x; cases x <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem K'.elim_update_rev {a b c d b'} : update (K'.elim a b c d) rev b' = K'.elim a b' c d := by
funext x; cases x <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem K'.elim_update_aux {a b c d c'} : update (K'.elim a b c d) aux c' = K'.elim a b c' d := by
funext x; cases x <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem K'.elim_update_stack {a b c d d'} :
update (K'.elim a b c d) stack d' = K'.elim a b c d' := by funext x; cases x <;> rfl
/-- The halting state corresponding to a `List ℕ` output value. -/
def halt (v : List ℕ) : Cfg' :=
⟨none, none, K'.elim (trList v) [] [] []⟩
/-- The `Cfg` states map to `Cfg'` states almost one to one, except that in normal operation the
local store contains an arbitrary garbage value. To make the final theorem cleaner we explicitly
clear it in the halt state so that there is exactly one configuration corresponding to output `v`.
-/
def TrCfg : Cfg → Cfg' → Prop
| Cfg.ret k v, c' =>
∃ s, c' = ⟨some (Λ'.ret (trCont k)), s, K'.elim (trList v) [] [] (trContStack k)⟩
| Cfg.halt v, c' => c' = halt v
/-- This could be a general list definition, but it is also somewhat specialized to this
application. `splitAtPred p L` will search `L` for the first element satisfying `p`.
If it is found, say `L = l₁ ++ a :: l₂` where `a` satisfies `p` but `l₁` does not, then it returns
`(l₁, some a, l₂)`. Otherwise, if there is no such element, it returns `(L, none, [])`. -/
def splitAtPred {α} (p : α → Bool) : List α → List α × Option α × List α
| [] => ([], none, [])
| a :: as =>
cond (p a) ([], some a, as) <|
let ⟨l₁, o, l₂⟩ := splitAtPred p as
⟨a::l₁, o, l₂⟩
theorem splitAtPred_eq {α} (p : α → Bool) :
∀ L l₁ o l₂,
(∀ x ∈ l₁, p x = false) →
Option.elim' (L = l₁ ∧ l₂ = []) (fun a => p a = true ∧ L = l₁ ++ a::l₂) o →
splitAtPred p L = (l₁, o, l₂)
| [], _, none, _, _, ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ => rfl
| [], l₁, some o, l₂, _, ⟨_, h₃⟩ => by simp at h₃
| a :: L, l₁, o, l₂, h₁, h₂ => by
rw [splitAtPred]
have IH := splitAtPred_eq p L
rcases o with - | o
· rcases l₁ with - | ⟨a', l₁⟩ <;> rcases h₂ with ⟨⟨⟩, rfl⟩
rw [h₁ a (List.Mem.head _), cond, IH L none [] _ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩]
exact fun x h => h₁ x (List.Mem.tail _ h)
· rcases l₁ with - | ⟨a', l₁⟩ <;> rcases h₂ with ⟨h₂, ⟨⟩⟩
· rw [h₂, cond]
rw [h₁ a (List.Mem.head _), cond, IH l₁ (some o) l₂ _ ⟨h₂, _⟩] <;> try rfl
exact fun x h => h₁ x (List.Mem.tail _ h)
theorem splitAtPred_false {α} (L : List α) : splitAtPred (fun _ => false) L = (L, none, []) :=
splitAtPred_eq _ _ _ _ _ (fun _ _ => rfl) ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
theorem move_ok {p k₁ k₂ q s L₁ o L₂} {S : K' → List Γ'} (h₁ : k₁ ≠ k₂)
(e : splitAtPred p (S k₁) = (L₁, o, L₂)) :
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some (Λ'.move p k₁ k₂ q), s, S⟩
⟨some q, o, update (update S k₁ L₂) k₂ (L₁.reverseAux (S k₂))⟩ := by
induction' L₁ with a L₁ IH generalizing S s
· rw [(_ : [].reverseAux _ = _), Function.update_eq_self]
swap
· rw [Function.update_of_ne h₁.symm, List.reverseAux_nil]
refine TransGen.head' rfl ?_
rw [tr]; simp only [pop', TM2.stepAux]
revert e; rcases S k₁ with - | ⟨a, Sk⟩ <;> intro e
· cases e
rfl
simp only [splitAtPred, Option.elim, List.head?, List.tail_cons, Option.iget_some] at e ⊢
revert e; cases p a <;> intro e <;>
simp only [cond_false, cond_true, Prod.mk.injEq, true_and, false_and, reduceCtorEq] at e ⊢
simp only [e]
rfl
· refine TransGen.head rfl ?_
rw [tr]; simp only [pop', Option.elim, TM2.stepAux, push']
rcases e₁ : S k₁ with - | ⟨a', Sk⟩ <;> rw [e₁, splitAtPred] at e
· cases e
cases e₂ : p a' <;> simp only [e₂, cond] at e
swap
· cases e
rcases e₃ : splitAtPred p Sk with ⟨_, _, _⟩
rw [e₃] at e
cases e
simp only [List.head?_cons, e₂, List.tail_cons, ne_eq, cond_false]
convert @IH _ (update (update S k₁ Sk) k₂ (a :: S k₂)) _ using 2 <;>
simp [Function.update_of_ne, h₁, h₁.symm, e₃, List.reverseAux]
simp [Function.update_comm h₁.symm]
theorem unrev_ok {q s} {S : K' → List Γ'} :
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some (unrev q), s, S⟩
⟨some q, none, update (update S rev []) main (List.reverseAux (S rev) (S main))⟩ :=
move_ok (by decide) <| splitAtPred_false _
theorem move₂_ok {p k₁ k₂ q s L₁ o L₂} {S : K' → List Γ'} (h₁ : k₁ ≠ rev ∧ k₂ ≠ rev ∧ k₁ ≠ k₂)
(h₂ : S rev = []) (e : splitAtPred p (S k₁) = (L₁, o, L₂)) :
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some (move₂ p k₁ k₂ q), s, S⟩
⟨some q, none, update (update S k₁ (o.elim id List.cons L₂)) k₂ (L₁ ++ S k₂)⟩ := by
refine (move_ok h₁.1 e).trans (TransGen.head rfl ?_)
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, id_eq, ne_eq, Option.elim]
cases o <;> simp only [Option.elim] <;> rw [tr]
<;> simp only [id, TM2.stepAux, Option.isSome, cond_true, cond_false]
· convert move_ok h₁.2.1.symm (splitAtPred_false _) using 2
simp only [Function.update_comm h₁.1, Function.update_idem]
rw [show update S rev [] = S by rw [← h₂, Function.update_eq_self]]
simp only [Function.update_of_ne h₁.2.2.symm, Function.update_of_ne h₁.2.1,
Function.update_of_ne h₁.1.symm, List.reverseAux_eq, h₂, Function.update_self,
List.append_nil, List.reverse_reverse]
· convert move_ok h₁.2.1.symm (splitAtPred_false _) using 2
simp only [h₂, Function.update_comm h₁.1, List.reverseAux_eq, Function.update_self,
List.append_nil, Function.update_idem]
rw [show update S rev [] = S by rw [← h₂, Function.update_eq_self]]
simp only [Function.update_of_ne h₁.1.symm, Function.update_of_ne h₁.2.2.symm,
Function.update_of_ne h₁.2.1, Function.update_self, List.reverse_reverse]
theorem clear_ok {p k q s L₁ o L₂} {S : K' → List Γ'} (e : splitAtPred p (S k) = (L₁, o, L₂)) :
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some (Λ'.clear p k q), s, S⟩ ⟨some q, o, update S k L₂⟩ := by
induction' L₁ with a L₁ IH generalizing S s
· refine TransGen.head' rfl ?_
rw [tr]; simp only [pop', TM2.step, Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, Option.elim]
revert e; rcases S k with - | ⟨a, Sk⟩ <;> intro e
· cases e
rfl
simp only [splitAtPred, Option.elim, List.head?, List.tail_cons] at e ⊢
revert e; cases p a <;> intro e <;>
simp only [cond_false, cond_true, Prod.mk.injEq, true_and, false_and, reduceCtorEq] at e ⊢
rcases e with ⟨e₁, e₂⟩
rw [e₁, e₂]
· refine TransGen.head rfl ?_
rw [tr]; simp only [pop', TM2.step, Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, Option.elim]
rcases e₁ : S k with - | ⟨a', Sk⟩ <;> rw [e₁, splitAtPred] at e
· cases e
cases e₂ : p a' <;> simp only [e₂, cond] at e
swap
· cases e
rcases e₃ : splitAtPred p Sk with ⟨_, _, _⟩
rw [e₃] at e
cases e
simp only [List.head?_cons, e₂, List.tail_cons, cond_false]
convert @IH _ (update S k Sk) _ using 2 <;> simp [e₃]
theorem copy_ok (q s a b c d) :
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some (Λ'.copy q), s, K'.elim a b c d⟩
⟨some q, none, K'.elim (List.reverseAux b a) [] c (List.reverseAux b d)⟩ := by
induction' b with x b IH generalizing a d s
· refine TransGen.single ?_
simp
refine TransGen.head rfl ?_
rw [tr]
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, elim_rev, List.head?_cons, Option.isSome_some,
List.tail_cons, elim_update_rev, ne_eq, Function.update_of_ne, elim_main, elim_update_main,
elim_stack, elim_update_stack, cond_true, List.reverseAux_cons, pop', push']
exact IH _ _ _
theorem trPosNum_natEnd : ∀ (n), ∀ x ∈ trPosNum n, natEnd x = false
| PosNum.one, _, List.Mem.head _ => rfl
| PosNum.bit0 _, _, List.Mem.head _ => rfl
| PosNum.bit0 n, _, List.Mem.tail _ h => trPosNum_natEnd n _ h
| PosNum.bit1 _, _, List.Mem.head _ => rfl
| PosNum.bit1 n, _, List.Mem.tail _ h => trPosNum_natEnd n _ h
theorem trNum_natEnd : ∀ (n), ∀ x ∈ trNum n, natEnd x = false
| Num.pos n, x, h => trPosNum_natEnd n x h
theorem trNat_natEnd (n) : ∀ x ∈ trNat n, natEnd x = false :=
trNum_natEnd _
theorem trList_ne_consₗ : ∀ (l), ∀ x ∈ trList l, x ≠ Γ'.consₗ
| a :: l, x, h => by
simp only [trList, List.mem_append, List.mem_cons] at h
obtain h | rfl | h := h
· rintro rfl
cases trNat_natEnd _ _ h
· rintro ⟨⟩
· exact trList_ne_consₗ l _ h
theorem head_main_ok {q s L} {c d : List Γ'} :
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some (head main q), s, K'.elim (trList L) [] c d⟩
⟨some q, none, K'.elim (trList [L.headI]) [] c d⟩ := by
let o : Option Γ' := List.casesOn L none fun _ _ => some Γ'.cons
refine
(move_ok (by decide)
(splitAtPred_eq _ _ (trNat L.headI) o (trList L.tail) (trNat_natEnd _) ?_)).trans
(TransGen.head rfl (TransGen.head rfl ?_))
· cases L <;> simp [o]
rw [tr]
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, elim_update_main, elim_rev, elim_update_rev,
Function.update_self, trList]
rw [if_neg (show o ≠ some Γ'.consₗ by cases L <;> simp [o])]
refine (clear_ok (splitAtPred_eq _ _ _ none [] ?_ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)).trans ?_
· exact fun x h => Bool.decide_false (trList_ne_consₗ _ _ h)
convert unrev_ok using 2; simp [List.reverseAux_eq]
theorem head_stack_ok {q s L₁ L₂ L₃} :
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr)
⟨some (head stack q), s, K'.elim (trList L₁) [] [] (trList L₂ ++ Γ'.consₗ :: L₃)⟩
⟨some q, none, K'.elim (trList (L₂.headI :: L₁)) [] [] L₃⟩ := by
rcases L₂ with - | ⟨a, L₂⟩
· refine
TransGen.trans
(move_ok (by decide)
(splitAtPred_eq _ _ [] (some Γ'.consₗ) L₃ (by rintro _ ⟨⟩) ⟨rfl, rfl⟩))
(TransGen.head rfl (TransGen.head rfl ?_))
rw [tr]
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, ite_true, id_eq, trList, List.nil_append,
elim_update_stack, elim_rev, List.reverseAux_nil, elim_update_rev, Function.update_self,
List.headI_nil, trNat_default]
convert unrev_ok using 2
simp
· refine
TransGen.trans
(move_ok (by decide)
(splitAtPred_eq _ _ (trNat a) (some Γ'.cons) (trList L₂ ++ Γ'.consₗ :: L₃)
(trNat_natEnd _) ⟨rfl, by simp⟩))
(TransGen.head rfl (TransGen.head rfl ?_))
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, ite_false, trList, List.append_assoc,
List.cons_append, elim_update_stack, elim_rev, elim_update_rev, Function.update_self,
List.headI_cons]
refine
TransGen.trans
(clear_ok
(splitAtPred_eq _ _ (trList L₂) (some Γ'.consₗ) L₃
(fun x h => Bool.decide_false (trList_ne_consₗ _ _ h)) ⟨rfl, by simp⟩))
?_
convert unrev_ok using 2
simp [List.reverseAux_eq]
theorem succ_ok {q s n} {c d : List Γ'} :
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some (Λ'.succ q), s, K'.elim (trList [n]) [] c d⟩
⟨some q, none, K'.elim (trList [n.succ]) [] c d⟩ := by
simp only [TM2.step, trList, trNat.eq_1, Nat.cast_succ, Num.add_one]
rcases (n : Num) with - | a
· refine TransGen.head rfl ?_
simp only [Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, elim_main, decide_false, elim_update_main, ne_eq,
Function.update_of_ne, elim_rev, elim_update_rev, decide_true, Function.update_self,
cond_true, cond_false]
convert unrev_ok using 1
simp only [elim_update_rev, elim_rev, elim_main, List.reverseAux_nil, elim_update_main]
rfl
simp only [trNum, Num.succ, Num.succ']
suffices ∀ l₁, ∃ l₁' l₂' s',
List.reverseAux l₁ (trPosNum a.succ) = List.reverseAux l₁' l₂' ∧
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some q.succ, s, K'.elim (trPosNum a ++ [Γ'.cons]) l₁ c d⟩
⟨some (unrev q), s', K'.elim (l₂' ++ [Γ'.cons]) l₁' c d⟩ by
obtain ⟨l₁', l₂', s', e, h⟩ := this []
simp? [List.reverseAux] at e says simp only [List.reverseAux, List.reverseAux_eq] at e
refine h.trans ?_
convert unrev_ok using 2
simp [e, List.reverseAux_eq]
induction' a with m IH m _ generalizing s <;> intro l₁
· refine ⟨Γ'.bit0 :: l₁, [Γ'.bit1], some Γ'.cons, rfl, TransGen.head rfl (TransGen.single ?_)⟩
simp [trPosNum]
· obtain ⟨l₁', l₂', s', e, h⟩ := IH (Γ'.bit0 :: l₁)
refine ⟨l₁', l₂', s', e, TransGen.head ?_ h⟩
simp [PosNum.succ, trPosNum]
rfl
· refine ⟨l₁, _, some Γ'.bit0, rfl, TransGen.single ?_⟩
simp only [TM2.step]; rw [tr]
simp only [TM2.stepAux, pop', elim_main, elim_update_main, ne_eq, Function.update_of_ne,
elim_rev, elim_update_rev, Function.update_self, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq]
rfl
theorem pred_ok (q₁ q₂ s v) (c d : List Γ') : ∃ s',
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some (Λ'.pred q₁ q₂), s, K'.elim (trList v) [] c d⟩
(v.headI.rec ⟨some q₁, s', K'.elim (trList v.tail) [] c d⟩ fun n _ =>
⟨some q₂, s', K'.elim (trList (n::v.tail)) [] c d⟩) := by
rcases v with (_ | ⟨_ | n, v⟩)
· refine ⟨none, TransGen.single ?_⟩
simp
· refine ⟨some Γ'.cons, TransGen.single ?_⟩
simp
refine ⟨none, ?_⟩
simp only [TM2.step, trList, trNat.eq_1, trNum, Nat.cast_succ, Num.add_one, Num.succ,
List.tail_cons, List.headI_cons]
rcases (n : Num) with - | a
· simp only [trPosNum, Num.succ', List.singleton_append, List.nil_append]
refine TransGen.head rfl ?_
rw [tr]; simp only [pop', TM2.stepAux, cond_false]
convert unrev_ok using 2
simp
simp only [Num.succ']
suffices ∀ l₁, ∃ l₁' l₂' s',
List.reverseAux l₁ (trPosNum a) = List.reverseAux l₁' l₂' ∧
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr)
⟨some (q₁.pred q₂), s, K'.elim (trPosNum a.succ ++ Γ'.cons :: trList v) l₁ c d⟩
⟨some (unrev q₂), s', K'.elim (l₂' ++ Γ'.cons :: trList v) l₁' c d⟩ by
obtain ⟨l₁', l₂', s', e, h⟩ := this []
simp only [List.reverseAux] at e
refine h.trans ?_
convert unrev_ok using 2
simp [e, List.reverseAux_eq]
induction' a with m IH m IH generalizing s <;> intro l₁
· refine ⟨Γ'.bit1::l₁, [], some Γ'.cons, rfl, TransGen.head rfl (TransGen.single ?_)⟩
simp [trPosNum, show PosNum.one.succ = PosNum.one.bit0 from rfl]
· obtain ⟨l₁', l₂', s', e, h⟩ := IH (some Γ'.bit0) (Γ'.bit1 :: l₁)
refine ⟨l₁', l₂', s', e, TransGen.head ?_ h⟩
simp
rfl
· obtain ⟨a, l, e, h⟩ : ∃ a l, (trPosNum m = a::l) ∧ natEnd a = false := by
cases m <;> refine ⟨_, _, rfl, rfl⟩
refine ⟨Γ'.bit0 :: l₁, _, some a, rfl, TransGen.single ?_⟩
simp [trPosNum, PosNum.succ, e, h, show some Γ'.bit1 ≠ some Γ'.bit0 by decide,
Option.iget, -natEnd]
rfl
theorem trNormal_respects (c k v s) :
∃ b₂,
TrCfg (stepNormal c k v) b₂ ∧
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr)
⟨some (trNormal c (trCont k)), s, K'.elim (trList v) [] [] (trContStack k)⟩ b₂ := by
induction c generalizing k v s with
| zero' => refine ⟨_, ⟨s, rfl⟩, TransGen.single ?_⟩; simp
| succ => refine ⟨_, ⟨none, rfl⟩, head_main_ok.trans succ_ok⟩
| tail =>
let o : Option Γ' := List.casesOn v none fun _ _ => some Γ'.cons
refine ⟨_, ⟨o, rfl⟩, ?_⟩; convert clear_ok _ using 2
· simp; rfl
swap
refine splitAtPred_eq _ _ (trNat v.headI) _ _ (trNat_natEnd _) ?_
cases v <;> simp [o]
| cons f fs IHf _ =>
obtain ⟨c, h₁, h₂⟩ := IHf (Cont.cons₁ fs v k) v none
refine ⟨c, h₁, TransGen.head rfl <| (move_ok (by decide) (splitAtPred_false _)).trans ?_⟩
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, elim_stack, elim_update_stack, elim_update_main, ne_eq,
Function.update_of_ne, elim_main, elim_rev, elim_update_rev]
refine (copy_ok _ none [] (trList v).reverse _ _).trans ?_
convert h₂ using 2
simp [List.reverseAux_eq, trContStack]
| comp f _ _ IHg => exact IHg (Cont.comp f k) v s
| case f g IHf IHg =>
rw [stepNormal]
simp only
obtain ⟨s', h⟩ := pred_ok _ _ s v _ _
revert h; rcases v.headI with - | n <;> intro h
· obtain ⟨c, h₁, h₂⟩ := IHf k _ s'
exact ⟨_, h₁, h.trans h₂⟩
· obtain ⟨c, h₁, h₂⟩ := IHg k _ s'
exact ⟨_, h₁, h.trans h₂⟩
| fix f IH => apply IH
theorem tr_ret_respects (k v s) : ∃ b₂,
TrCfg (stepRet k v) b₂ ∧
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr)
⟨some (Λ'.ret (trCont k)), s, K'.elim (trList v) [] [] (trContStack k)⟩ b₂ := by
induction k generalizing v s with
| halt => exact ⟨_, rfl, TransGen.single rfl⟩
| cons₁ fs as k _ =>
obtain ⟨s', h₁, h₂⟩ := trNormal_respects fs (Cont.cons₂ v k) as none
refine ⟨s', h₁, TransGen.head rfl ?_⟩; simp
refine (move₂_ok (by decide) ?_ (splitAtPred_false _)).trans ?_; · rfl
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, Option.elim, id_eq, elim_update_main, elim_main, elim_aux,
List.append_nil, elim_update_aux]
refine (move₂_ok (L₁ := ?_) (o := ?_) (L₂ := ?_) (by decide) rfl ?_).trans ?_
pick_goal 4
· exact splitAtPred_eq _ _ _ (some Γ'.consₗ) _
(fun x h => Bool.decide_false (trList_ne_consₗ _ _ h)) ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
refine (move₂_ok (by decide) ?_ (splitAtPred_false _)).trans ?_; · rfl
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, Option.elim, elim_update_stack, elim_main,
List.append_nil, elim_update_main, id_eq, elim_update_aux, ne_eq, Function.update_of_ne,
elim_aux, elim_stack]
exact h₂
| cons₂ ns k IH =>
obtain ⟨c, h₁, h₂⟩ := IH (ns.headI :: v) none
exact ⟨c, h₁, TransGen.head rfl <| head_stack_ok.trans h₂⟩
| comp f k _ =>
obtain ⟨s', h₁, h₂⟩ := trNormal_respects f k v s
exact ⟨_, h₁, TransGen.head rfl h₂⟩
| fix f k IH =>
rw [stepRet]
have :
if v.headI = 0 then natEnd (trList v).head?.iget = true ∧ (trList v).tail = trList v.tail
else
natEnd (trList v).head?.iget = false ∧
(trList v).tail = (trNat v.headI).tail ++ Γ'.cons :: trList v.tail := by
obtain - | n := v
· exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
rcases n with - | n
· simp
rw [trList, List.headI, trNat, Nat.cast_succ, Num.add_one, Num.succ, List.tail]
cases (n : Num).succ' <;> exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
by_cases h : v.headI = 0 <;> simp only [h, ite_true, ite_false] at this ⊢
· obtain ⟨c, h₁, h₂⟩ := IH v.tail (trList v).head?
refine ⟨c, h₁, TransGen.head rfl ?_⟩
rw [trCont, tr]; simp only [pop', TM2.stepAux, elim_main, this, elim_update_main]
exact h₂
· obtain ⟨s', h₁, h₂⟩ := trNormal_respects f (Cont.fix f k) v.tail (some Γ'.cons)
refine ⟨_, h₁, TransGen.head rfl <| TransGen.trans ?_ h₂⟩
rw [trCont, tr]; simp only [pop', TM2.stepAux, elim_main, this.1]
convert clear_ok (splitAtPred_eq _ _ (trNat v.headI).tail (some Γ'.cons) _ _ _) using 2
· simp
convert rfl
· exact fun x h => trNat_natEnd _ _ (List.tail_subset _ h)
· exact ⟨rfl, this.2⟩
theorem tr_respects : Respects step (TM2.step tr) TrCfg
| Cfg.ret _ _, _, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => tr_ret_respects _ _ _
| Cfg.halt _, _, rfl => rfl
/-- The initial state, evaluating function `c` on input `v`. -/
def init (c : Code) (v : List ℕ) : Cfg' :=
⟨some (trNormal c Cont'.halt), none, K'.elim (trList v) [] [] []⟩
theorem tr_init (c v) :
∃ b, TrCfg (stepNormal c Cont.halt v) b ∧ Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) (init c v) b :=
trNormal_respects _ _ _ _
theorem tr_eval (c v) : eval (TM2.step tr) (init c v) = halt <$> Code.eval c v := by
obtain ⟨i, h₁, h₂⟩ := tr_init c v
refine Part.ext fun x => ?_
rw [reaches_eval h₂.to_reflTransGen]; simp only [Part.map_eq_map, Part.mem_map_iff]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨c, hc₁, hc₂⟩ := tr_eval_rev tr_respects h₁ h
simp [stepNormal_eval] at hc₂
obtain ⟨v', hv, rfl⟩ := hc₂
exact ⟨_, hv, hc₁.symm⟩
· rintro ⟨v', hv, rfl⟩
have := Turing.tr_eval (b₁ := Cfg.halt v') tr_respects h₁
simp only [stepNormal_eval, Part.map_eq_map, Part.mem_map_iff, Cfg.halt.injEq,
exists_eq_right] at this
obtain ⟨_, ⟨⟩, h⟩ := this hv
exact h
/-- The set of machine states reachable via downward label jumps, discounting jumps via `ret`. -/
def trStmts₁ : Λ' → Finset Λ'
| Q@(Λ'.move _ _ _ q) => insert Q <| trStmts₁ q
| Q@(Λ'.push _ _ q) => insert Q <| trStmts₁ q
| Q@(Λ'.read q) => insert Q <| Finset.univ.biUnion fun s => trStmts₁ (q s)
| Q@(Λ'.clear _ _ q) => insert Q <| trStmts₁ q
| Q@(Λ'.copy q) => insert Q <| trStmts₁ q
| Q@(Λ'.succ q) => insert Q <| insert (unrev q) <| trStmts₁ q
| Q@(Λ'.pred q₁ q₂) => insert Q <| trStmts₁ q₁ ∪ insert (unrev q₂) (trStmts₁ q₂)
| Q@(Λ'.ret _) => {Q}
theorem trStmts₁_trans {q q'} : q' ∈ trStmts₁ q → trStmts₁ q' ⊆ trStmts₁ q := by
induction q with
| move _ _ _ q q_ih => _ | clear _ _ q q_ih => _ | copy q q_ih => _ | push _ _ q q_ih => _
| read q q_ih => _ | succ q q_ih => _ | pred q₁ q₂ q₁_ih q₂_ih => _ | ret => _ <;>
all_goals
simp +contextual only [trStmts₁, Finset.mem_insert, Finset.mem_union,
or_imp, Finset.mem_singleton, Finset.Subset.refl, imp_true_iff, true_and]
repeat exact fun h => Finset.Subset.trans (q_ih h) (Finset.subset_insert _ _)
· simp
intro s h x h'
simp only [Finset.mem_biUnion, Finset.mem_univ, true_and, Finset.mem_insert]
exact Or.inr ⟨_, q_ih s h h'⟩
· constructor
· rintro rfl
apply Finset.subset_insert
· intro h x h'
simp only [Finset.mem_insert]
exact Or.inr (Or.inr <| q_ih h h')
· refine ⟨fun h x h' => ?_, fun _ x h' => ?_, fun h x h' => ?_⟩ <;> simp
· exact Or.inr (Or.inr <| Or.inl <| q₁_ih h h')
· rcases Finset.mem_insert.1 h' with h' | h' <;> simp [h', unrev]
· exact Or.inr (Or.inr <| Or.inr <| q₂_ih h h')
theorem trStmts₁_self (q) : q ∈ trStmts₁ q := by
induction q <;> · first |apply Finset.mem_singleton_self|apply Finset.mem_insert_self
/-- The (finite!) set of machine states visited during the course of evaluation of `c`,
including the state `ret k` but not any states after that (that is, the states visited while
evaluating `k`). -/
def codeSupp' : Code → Cont' → Finset Λ'
| c@Code.zero', k => trStmts₁ (trNormal c k)
| c@Code.succ, k => trStmts₁ (trNormal c k)
| c@Code.tail, k => trStmts₁ (trNormal c k)
| c@(Code.cons f fs), k =>
trStmts₁ (trNormal c k) ∪
(codeSupp' f (Cont'.cons₁ fs k) ∪
(trStmts₁
(move₂ (fun _ => false) main aux <|
move₂ (fun s => s = Γ'.consₗ) stack main <|
move₂ (fun _ => false) aux stack <| trNormal fs (Cont'.cons₂ k)) ∪
(codeSupp' fs (Cont'.cons₂ k) ∪ trStmts₁ (head stack <| Λ'.ret k))))
| c@(Code.comp f g), k =>
trStmts₁ (trNormal c k) ∪
(codeSupp' g (Cont'.comp f k) ∪ (trStmts₁ (trNormal f k) ∪ codeSupp' f k))
| c@(Code.case f g), k => trStmts₁ (trNormal c k) ∪ (codeSupp' f k ∪ codeSupp' g k)
| c@(Code.fix f), k =>
trStmts₁ (trNormal c k) ∪
(codeSupp' f (Cont'.fix f k) ∪
(trStmts₁ (Λ'.clear natEnd main <| trNormal f (Cont'.fix f k)) ∪ {Λ'.ret k}))
@[simp]
theorem codeSupp'_self (c k) : trStmts₁ (trNormal c k) ⊆ codeSupp' c k := by
cases c <;> first | rfl | exact Finset.union_subset_left (fun _ a ↦ a)
/-- The (finite!) set of machine states visited during the course of evaluation of a continuation
`k`, not including the initial state `ret k`. -/
def contSupp : Cont' → Finset Λ'
| Cont'.cons₁ fs k =>
trStmts₁
(move₂ (fun _ => false) main aux <|
move₂ (fun s => s = Γ'.consₗ) stack main <|
move₂ (fun _ => false) aux stack <| trNormal fs (Cont'.cons₂ k)) ∪
(codeSupp' fs (Cont'.cons₂ k) ∪ (trStmts₁ (head stack <| Λ'.ret k) ∪ contSupp k))
| Cont'.cons₂ k => trStmts₁ (head stack <| Λ'.ret k) ∪ contSupp k
| Cont'.comp f k => codeSupp' f k ∪ contSupp k
| Cont'.fix f k => codeSupp' (Code.fix f) k ∪ contSupp k
| Cont'.halt => ∅
/-- The (finite!) set of machine states visited during the course of evaluation of `c` in
continuation `k`. This is actually closed under forward simulation (see `tr_supports`), and the
existence of this set means that the machine constructed in this section is in fact a proper
Turing machine, with a finite set of states. -/
def codeSupp (c : Code) (k : Cont') : Finset Λ' :=
codeSupp' c k ∪ contSupp k
@[simp]
theorem codeSupp_self (c k) : trStmts₁ (trNormal c k) ⊆ codeSupp c k :=
Finset.Subset.trans (codeSupp'_self _ _) (Finset.union_subset_left fun _ a ↦ a)
@[simp]
theorem codeSupp_zero (k) : codeSupp Code.zero' k = trStmts₁ (trNormal Code.zero' k) ∪ contSupp k :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem codeSupp_succ (k) : codeSupp Code.succ k = trStmts₁ (trNormal Code.succ k) ∪ contSupp k :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem codeSupp_tail (k) : codeSupp Code.tail k = trStmts₁ (trNormal Code.tail k) ∪ contSupp k :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem codeSupp_cons (f fs k) :
codeSupp (Code.cons f fs) k =
trStmts₁ (trNormal (Code.cons f fs) k) ∪ codeSupp f (Cont'.cons₁ fs k) := by
simp [codeSupp, codeSupp', contSupp, Finset.union_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem codeSupp_comp (f g k) :
codeSupp (Code.comp f g) k =
trStmts₁ (trNormal (Code.comp f g) k) ∪ codeSupp g (Cont'.comp f k) := by
simp only [codeSupp, codeSupp', trNormal, Finset.union_assoc, contSupp]
rw [← Finset.union_assoc _ _ (contSupp k),
Finset.union_eq_right.2 (codeSupp'_self _ _)]
@[simp]
theorem codeSupp_case (f g k) :
codeSupp (Code.case f g) k =
trStmts₁ (trNormal (Code.case f g) k) ∪ (codeSupp f k ∪ codeSupp g k) := by
simp [codeSupp, codeSupp', contSupp, Finset.union_assoc, Finset.union_left_comm]
@[simp]
theorem codeSupp_fix (f k) :
codeSupp (Code.fix f) k = trStmts₁ (trNormal (Code.fix f) k) ∪ codeSupp f (Cont'.fix f k) := by
simp [codeSupp, codeSupp', contSupp, Finset.union_assoc, Finset.union_left_comm,
Finset.union_left_idem]
@[simp]
theorem contSupp_cons₁ (fs k) :
contSupp (Cont'.cons₁ fs k) =
trStmts₁
(move₂ (fun _ => false) main aux <|
move₂ (fun s => s = Γ'.consₗ) stack main <|
move₂ (fun _ => false) aux stack <| trNormal fs (Cont'.cons₂ k)) ∪
codeSupp fs (Cont'.cons₂ k) := by
simp [codeSupp, codeSupp', contSupp, Finset.union_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem contSupp_cons₂ (k) :
contSupp (Cont'.cons₂ k) = trStmts₁ (head stack <| Λ'.ret k) ∪ contSupp k :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem contSupp_comp (f k) : contSupp (Cont'.comp f k) = codeSupp f k :=
rfl
theorem contSupp_fix (f k) : contSupp (Cont'.fix f k) = codeSupp f (Cont'.fix f k) := by
simp +contextual [codeSupp, codeSupp', contSupp, Finset.union_assoc,
Finset.subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem contSupp_halt : contSupp Cont'.halt = ∅ :=
rfl
/-- The statement `Λ'.Supports S q` means that `contSupp k ⊆ S` for any `ret k`
reachable from `q`.
(This is a technical condition used in the proof that the machine is supported.) -/
def Λ'.Supports (S : Finset Λ') : Λ' → Prop
| Λ'.move _ _ _ q => Λ'.Supports S q
| Λ'.push _ _ q => Λ'.Supports S q
| Λ'.read q => ∀ s, Λ'.Supports S (q s)
| Λ'.clear _ _ q => Λ'.Supports S q
| Λ'.copy q => Λ'.Supports S q
| Λ'.succ q => Λ'.Supports S q
| Λ'.pred q₁ q₂ => Λ'.Supports S q₁ ∧ Λ'.Supports S q₂
| Λ'.ret k => contSupp k ⊆ S
/-- A shorthand for the predicate that we are proving in the main theorems `trStmts₁_supports`,
`codeSupp'_supports`, `contSupp_supports`, `codeSupp_supports`. The set `S` is fixed throughout
the proof, and denotes the full set of states in the machine, while `K` is a subset that we are
currently proving a property about. The predicate asserts that every state in `K` is closed in `S`
under forward simulation, i.e. stepping forward through evaluation starting from any state in `K`
stays entirely within `S`. -/
def Supports (K S : Finset Λ') :=
∀ q ∈ K, TM2.SupportsStmt S (tr q)
theorem supports_insert {K S q} :
Supports (insert q K) S ↔ TM2.SupportsStmt S (tr q) ∧ Supports K S := by simp [Supports]
theorem supports_singleton {S q} : Supports {q} S ↔ TM2.SupportsStmt S (tr q) := by simp [Supports]
theorem supports_union {K₁ K₂ S} : Supports (K₁ ∪ K₂) S ↔ Supports K₁ S ∧ Supports K₂ S := by
simp [Supports, or_imp, forall_and]
theorem supports_biUnion {K : Option Γ' → Finset Λ'} {S} :
Supports (Finset.univ.biUnion K) S ↔ ∀ a, Supports (K a) S := by
simpa [Supports] using forall_swap
theorem head_supports {S k q} (H : (q : Λ').Supports S) : (head k q).Supports S := fun _ => by
dsimp only; split_ifs <;> exact H
theorem ret_supports {S k} (H₁ : contSupp k ⊆ S) : TM2.SupportsStmt S (tr (Λ'.ret k)) := by
have W := fun {q} => trStmts₁_self q
cases k with
| halt => trivial
| cons₁ => rw [contSupp_cons₁, Finset.union_subset_iff] at H₁; exact fun _ => H₁.1 W
| cons₂ => rw [contSupp_cons₂, Finset.union_subset_iff] at H₁; exact fun _ => H₁.1 W
| comp => rw [contSupp_comp] at H₁; exact fun _ => H₁ (codeSupp_self _ _ W)
| fix =>
rw [contSupp_fix] at H₁
have L := @Finset.mem_union_left; have R := @Finset.mem_union_right
intro s; dsimp only; cases natEnd s.iget
· refine H₁ (R _ <| L _ <| R _ <| R _ <| L _ W)
· exact H₁ (R _ <| L _ <| R _ <| R _ <| R _ <| Finset.mem_singleton_self _)
theorem trStmts₁_supports {S q} (H₁ : (q : Λ').Supports S) (HS₁ : trStmts₁ q ⊆ S) :
Supports (trStmts₁ q) S := by
have W := fun {q} => trStmts₁_self q
induction q with
| move _ _ _ q q_ih => _ | clear _ _ q q_ih => _ | copy q q_ih => _ | push _ _ q q_ih => _
| read q q_ih => _ | succ q q_ih => _ | pred q₁ q₂ q₁_ih q₂_ih => _ | ret => _ <;>
simp [trStmts₁, -Finset.singleton_subset_iff] at HS₁ ⊢
any_goals
obtain ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := Finset.insert_subset_iff.1 HS₁
first | have h₃ := h₂ W | try simp [Finset.subset_iff] at h₂
· exact supports_insert.2 ⟨⟨fun _ => h₃, fun _ => h₁⟩, q_ih H₁ h₂⟩ -- move
· exact supports_insert.2 ⟨⟨fun _ => h₃, fun _ => h₁⟩, q_ih H₁ h₂⟩ -- clear
· exact supports_insert.2 ⟨⟨fun _ => h₁, fun _ => h₃⟩, q_ih H₁ h₂⟩ -- copy
· exact supports_insert.2 ⟨⟨fun _ => h₃, fun _ => h₃⟩, q_ih H₁ h₂⟩ -- push
· refine supports_insert.2 ⟨fun _ => h₂ _ W, ?_⟩ -- read
exact supports_biUnion.2 fun _ => q_ih _ (H₁ _) fun _ h => h₂ _ h
· refine supports_insert.2 ⟨⟨fun _ => h₁, fun _ => h₂.1, fun _ => h₂.1⟩, ?_⟩ -- succ
exact supports_insert.2 ⟨⟨fun _ => h₂.2 _ W, fun _ => h₂.1⟩, q_ih H₁ h₂.2⟩
· refine -- pred
supports_insert.2 ⟨⟨fun _ => h₁, fun _ => h₂.2 _ (Or.inl W),
fun _ => h₂.1, fun _ => h₂.1⟩, ?_⟩
refine supports_insert.2 ⟨⟨fun _ => h₂.2 _ (Or.inr W), fun _ => h₂.1⟩, ?_⟩
refine supports_union.2 ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· exact q₁_ih H₁.1 fun _ h => h₂.2 _ (Or.inl h)
· exact q₂_ih H₁.2 fun _ h => h₂.2 _ (Or.inr h)
· exact supports_singleton.2 (ret_supports H₁) -- ret
theorem trStmts₁_supports' {S q K} (H₁ : (q : Λ').Supports S) (H₂ : trStmts₁ q ∪ K ⊆ S)
(H₃ : K ⊆ S → Supports K S) : Supports (trStmts₁ q ∪ K) S := by
simp only [Finset.union_subset_iff] at H₂
exact supports_union.2 ⟨trStmts₁_supports H₁ H₂.1, H₃ H₂.2⟩
theorem trNormal_supports {S c k} (Hk : codeSupp c k ⊆ S) : (trNormal c k).Supports S := by
induction c generalizing k with simp [Λ'.Supports, head]
| zero' => exact Finset.union_subset_right Hk
| succ => intro; split_ifs <;> exact Finset.union_subset_right Hk
| tail => exact Finset.union_subset_right Hk
| cons f fs IHf _ =>
apply IHf
rw [codeSupp_cons] at Hk
exact Finset.union_subset_right Hk
| comp f g _ IHg => apply IHg; rw [codeSupp_comp] at Hk; exact Finset.union_subset_right Hk
| case f g IHf IHg =>
simp only [codeSupp_case, Finset.union_subset_iff] at Hk
exact ⟨IHf Hk.2.1, IHg Hk.2.2⟩
| fix f IHf => apply IHf; rw [codeSupp_fix] at Hk; exact Finset.union_subset_right Hk
theorem codeSupp'_supports {S c k} (H : codeSupp c k ⊆ S) : Supports (codeSupp' c k) S := by
induction c generalizing k with
| cons f fs IHf IHfs =>
have H' := H; simp only [codeSupp_cons, Finset.union_subset_iff] at H'
refine trStmts₁_supports' (trNormal_supports H) (Finset.union_subset_left H) fun h => ?_
refine supports_union.2 ⟨IHf H'.2, ?_⟩
refine trStmts₁_supports' (trNormal_supports ?_) (Finset.union_subset_right h) fun h => ?_
· simp only [codeSupp, Finset.union_subset_iff, contSupp] at h H ⊢
exact ⟨h.2.2.1, h.2.2.2, H.2⟩
refine supports_union.2 ⟨IHfs ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [codeSupp, contSupp_cons₁] at H'
exact Finset.union_subset_right (Finset.union_subset_right H'.2)
exact
trStmts₁_supports (head_supports <| Finset.union_subset_right H)
(Finset.union_subset_right h)
| comp f g IHf IHg =>
have H' := H; rw [codeSupp_comp] at H'; have H' := Finset.union_subset_right H'
refine trStmts₁_supports' (trNormal_supports H) (Finset.union_subset_left H) fun h => ?_
refine supports_union.2 ⟨IHg H', ?_⟩
refine trStmts₁_supports' (trNormal_supports ?_) (Finset.union_subset_right h) fun _ => ?_
· simp only [codeSupp', codeSupp, Finset.union_subset_iff, contSupp] at h H ⊢
exact ⟨h.2.2, H.2⟩
exact IHf (Finset.union_subset_right H')
| case f g IHf IHg =>
have H' := H; simp only [codeSupp_case, Finset.union_subset_iff] at H'
refine trStmts₁_supports' (trNormal_supports H) (Finset.union_subset_left H) fun _ => ?_
exact supports_union.2 ⟨IHf H'.2.1, IHg H'.2.2⟩
| fix f IHf =>
have H' := H; simp only [codeSupp_fix, Finset.union_subset_iff] at H'
refine trStmts₁_supports' (trNormal_supports H) (Finset.union_subset_left H) fun h => ?_
refine supports_union.2 ⟨IHf H'.2, ?_⟩
refine trStmts₁_supports' (trNormal_supports ?_) (Finset.union_subset_right h) fun _ => ?_
· simp only [codeSupp', codeSupp, Finset.union_subset_iff, contSupp, trStmts₁,
Finset.insert_subset_iff] at h H ⊢
exact ⟨h.1, ⟨H.1.1, h⟩, H.2⟩
exact supports_singleton.2 (ret_supports <| Finset.union_subset_right H)
| _ => exact trStmts₁_supports (trNormal_supports H) (Finset.Subset.trans (codeSupp_self _ _) H)
theorem contSupp_supports {S k} (H : contSupp k ⊆ S) : Supports (contSupp k) S := by
induction k with
| halt => simp [contSupp_halt, Supports]
| cons₁ f k IH =>
have H₁ := H; rw [contSupp_cons₁] at H₁; have H₂ := Finset.union_subset_right H₁
refine trStmts₁_supports' (trNormal_supports H₂) H₁ fun h => ?_
refine supports_union.2 ⟨codeSupp'_supports H₂, ?_⟩
simp only [codeSupp, contSupp_cons₂, Finset.union_subset_iff] at H₂
exact trStmts₁_supports' (head_supports H₂.2.2) (Finset.union_subset_right h) IH
| cons₂ k IH =>
have H' := H; rw [contSupp_cons₂] at H'
exact trStmts₁_supports' (head_supports <| Finset.union_subset_right H') H' IH
| comp f k IH =>
have H' := H; rw [contSupp_comp] at H'; have H₂ := Finset.union_subset_right H'
exact supports_union.2 ⟨codeSupp'_supports H', IH H₂⟩
| fix f k IH =>
rw [contSupp] at H
exact supports_union.2 ⟨codeSupp'_supports H, IH (Finset.union_subset_right H)⟩
theorem codeSupp_supports {S c k} (H : codeSupp c k ⊆ S) : Supports (codeSupp c k) S :=
supports_union.2 ⟨codeSupp'_supports H, contSupp_supports (Finset.union_subset_right H)⟩
/-- The set `codeSupp c k` is a finite set that witnesses the effective finiteness of the `tr`
Turing machine. Starting from the initial state `trNormal c k`, forward simulation uses only
states in `codeSupp c k`, so this is a finite state machine. Even though the underlying type of
state labels `Λ'` is infinite, for a given partial recursive function `c` and continuation `k`,
only finitely many states are accessed, corresponding roughly to subterms of `c`. -/
theorem tr_supports (c k) : @TM2.Supports _ _ _ _ ⟨trNormal c k⟩ tr (codeSupp c k) :=
⟨codeSupp_self _ _ (trStmts₁_self _), fun _ => codeSupp_supports (Finset.Subset.refl _) _⟩
end
end PartrecToTM2
end Turing
| Mathlib/Computability/TMToPartrec.lean | 1,928 | 1,929 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.MeasurablyGenerated
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.NullMeasurable
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Monotone
/-!
# Measure spaces
The definition of a measure and a measure space are in `MeasureTheory.MeasureSpaceDef`, with
only a few basic properties. This file provides many more properties of these objects.
This separation allows the measurability tactic to import only the file `MeasureSpaceDef`, and to
be available in `MeasureSpace` (through `MeasurableSpace`).
Given a measurable space `α`, a measure on `α` is a function that sends measurable sets to the
extended nonnegative reals that satisfies the following conditions:
1. `μ ∅ = 0`;
2. `μ` is countably additive. This means that the measure of a countable union of pairwise disjoint
sets is equal to the measure of the individual sets.
Every measure can be canonically extended to an outer measure, so that it assigns values to
all subsets, not just the measurable subsets. On the other hand, a measure that is countably
additive on measurable sets can be restricted to measurable sets to obtain a measure.
In this file a measure is defined to be an outer measure that is countably additive on
measurable sets, with the additional assumption that the outer measure is the canonical
extension of the restricted measure.
Measures on `α` form a complete lattice, and are closed under scalar multiplication with `ℝ≥0∞`.
Given a measure, the null sets are the sets where `μ s = 0`, where `μ` denotes the corresponding
outer measure (so `s` might not be measurable). We can then define the completion of `μ` as the
measure on the least `σ`-algebra that also contains all null sets, by defining the measure to be `0`
on the null sets.
## Main statements
* `completion` is the completion of a measure to all null measurable sets.
* `Measure.ofMeasurable` and `OuterMeasure.toMeasure` are two important ways to define a measure.
## Implementation notes
Given `μ : Measure α`, `μ s` is the value of the *outer measure* applied to `s`.
This conveniently allows us to apply the measure to sets without proving that they are measurable.
We get countable subadditivity for all sets, but only countable additivity for measurable sets.
You often don't want to define a measure via its constructor.
Two ways that are sometimes more convenient:
* `Measure.ofMeasurable` is a way to define a measure by only giving its value on measurable sets
and proving the properties (1) and (2) mentioned above.
* `OuterMeasure.toMeasure` is a way of obtaining a measure from an outer measure by showing that
all measurable sets in the measurable space are Carathéodory measurable.
To prove that two measures are equal, there are multiple options:
* `ext`: two measures are equal if they are equal on all measurable sets.
* `ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion`: two measures are equal if they are equal on a π-system generating
the measurable sets, if the π-system contains a spanning increasing sequence of sets where the
measures take finite value (in particular the measures are σ-finite). This is a special case of
the more general `ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover`
* `ext_of_generate_finite`: two finite measures are equal if they are equal on a π-system
generating the measurable sets. This is a special case of `ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion` using
`C ∪ {univ}`, but is easier to work with.
A `MeasureSpace` is a class that is a measurable space with a canonical measure.
The measure is denoted `volume`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measure_(mathematics)>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complete_measure>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_everywhere>
## Tags
measure, almost everywhere, measure space, completion, null set, null measurable set
-/
noncomputable section
open Set
open Filter hiding map
open Function MeasurableSpace Topology Filter ENNReal NNReal Interval MeasureTheory
open scoped symmDiff
variable {α β γ δ ι R R' : Type*}
namespace MeasureTheory
section
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set α}
instance ae_isMeasurablyGenerated : IsMeasurablyGenerated (ae μ) :=
⟨fun _s hs =>
let ⟨t, hst, htm, htμ⟩ := exists_measurable_superset_of_null hs
⟨tᶜ, compl_mem_ae_iff.2 htμ, htm.compl, compl_subset_comm.1 hst⟩⟩
/-- See also `MeasureTheory.ae_restrict_uIoc_iff`. -/
theorem ae_uIoc_iff [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ι a b → P x) ↔ (∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ioc a b → P x) ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ioc b a → P x := by
simp only [uIoc_eq_union, mem_union, or_imp, eventually_and]
theorem measure_union (hd : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (h : MeasurableSet s₂) : μ (s₁ ∪ s₂) = μ s₁ + μ s₂ :=
measure_union₀ h.nullMeasurableSet hd.aedisjoint
theorem measure_union' (hd : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (h : MeasurableSet s₁) : μ (s₁ ∪ s₂) = μ s₁ + μ s₂ :=
measure_union₀' h.nullMeasurableSet hd.aedisjoint
theorem measure_inter_add_diff (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ (s ∩ t) + μ (s \ t) = μ s :=
measure_inter_add_diff₀ _ ht.nullMeasurableSet
theorem measure_diff_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ (s \ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s :=
(add_comm _ _).trans (measure_inter_add_diff s ht)
theorem measure_diff_eq_top (hs : μ s = ∞) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : μ (s \ t) = ∞ := by
contrapose! hs
exact ((measure_mono (subset_diff_union s t)).trans_lt
((measure_union_le _ _).trans_lt (ENNReal.add_lt_top.2 ⟨hs.lt_top, ht.lt_top⟩))).ne
theorem measure_union_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ (s ∪ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s + μ t := by
rw [← measure_inter_add_diff (s ∪ t) ht, Set.union_inter_cancel_right, union_diff_right, ←
measure_inter_add_diff s ht]
ac_rfl
theorem measure_union_add_inter' (hs : MeasurableSet s) (t : Set α) :
μ (s ∪ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s + μ t := by
rw [union_comm, inter_comm, measure_union_add_inter t hs, add_comm]
lemma measure_symmDiff_eq (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
μ (s ∆ t) = μ (s \ t) + μ (t \ s) := by
simpa only [symmDiff_def, sup_eq_union]
using measure_union₀ (ht.diff hs) disjoint_sdiff_sdiff.aedisjoint
lemma measure_symmDiff_le (s t u : Set α) :
μ (s ∆ u) ≤ μ (s ∆ t) + μ (t ∆ u) :=
le_trans (μ.mono <| symmDiff_triangle s t u) (measure_union_le (s ∆ t) (t ∆ u))
theorem measure_symmDiff_eq_top (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (ht : μ t = ∞) : μ (s ∆ t) = ∞ :=
measure_mono_top subset_union_right (measure_diff_eq_top ht hs)
theorem measure_add_measure_compl (h : MeasurableSet s) : μ s + μ sᶜ = μ univ :=
measure_add_measure_compl₀ h.nullMeasurableSet
theorem measure_biUnion₀ {s : Set β} {f : β → Set α} (hs : s.Countable)
(hd : s.Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on f)) (h : ∀ b ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (f b) μ) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑' p : s, μ (f p) := by
haveI := hs.toEncodable
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact measure_iUnion₀ (hd.on_injective Subtype.coe_injective fun x => x.2) fun x => h x x.2
theorem measure_biUnion {s : Set β} {f : β → Set α} (hs : s.Countable) (hd : s.PairwiseDisjoint f)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑' p : s, μ (f p) :=
measure_biUnion₀ hs hd.aedisjoint fun b hb => (h b hb).nullMeasurableSet
theorem measure_sUnion₀ {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : S.Countable) (hd : S.Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ))
(h : ∀ s ∈ S, NullMeasurableSet s μ) : μ (⋃₀ S) = ∑' s : S, μ s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, measure_biUnion₀ hs hd h]
theorem measure_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : S.Countable) (hd : S.Pairwise Disjoint)
(h : ∀ s ∈ S, MeasurableSet s) : μ (⋃₀ S) = ∑' s : S, μ s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, measure_biUnion hs hd h]
theorem measure_biUnion_finset₀ {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Set α}
(hd : Set.Pairwise (↑s) (AEDisjoint μ on f)) (hm : ∀ b ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (f b) μ) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ p ∈ s, μ (f p) := by
rw [← Finset.sum_attach, Finset.attach_eq_univ, ← tsum_fintype]
exact measure_biUnion₀ s.countable_toSet hd hm
theorem measure_biUnion_finset {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Set α} (hd : PairwiseDisjoint (↑s) f)
(hm : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ p ∈ s, μ (f p) :=
measure_biUnion_finset₀ hd.aedisjoint fun b hb => (hm b hb).nullMeasurableSet
/-- The measure of an a.e. disjoint union (even uncountable) of null-measurable sets is at least
the sum of the measures of the sets. -/
theorem tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint₀ {ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
{As : ι → Set α} (As_mble : ∀ i : ι, NullMeasurableSet (As i) μ)
(As_disj : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on As)) : (∑' i, μ (As i)) ≤ μ (⋃ i, As i) := by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum, iSup_le_iff]
intro s
simp only [← measure_biUnion_finset₀ (fun _i _hi _j _hj hij => As_disj hij) fun i _ => As_mble i]
gcongr
exact iUnion_subset fun _ ↦ Subset.rfl
/-- The measure of a disjoint union (even uncountable) of measurable sets is at least the sum of
the measures of the sets. -/
theorem tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint {ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
{As : ι → Set α} (As_mble : ∀ i : ι, MeasurableSet (As i))
(As_disj : Pairwise (Disjoint on As)) : (∑' i, μ (As i)) ≤ μ (⋃ i, As i) :=
tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint₀ μ (fun i ↦ (As_mble i).nullMeasurableSet)
(fun _ _ h ↦ Disjoint.aedisjoint (As_disj h))
/-- If `s` is a countable set, then the measure of its preimage can be found as the sum of measures
of the fibers `f ⁻¹' {y}`. -/
theorem tsum_measure_preimage_singleton {s : Set β} (hs : s.Countable) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ y ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {y})) : (∑' b : s, μ (f ⁻¹' {↑b})) = μ (f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← Set.biUnion_preimage_singleton, measure_biUnion hs (pairwiseDisjoint_fiber f s) hf]
lemma measure_preimage_eq_zero_iff_of_countable {s : Set β} {f : α → β} (hs : s.Countable) :
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = 0 ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, μ (f ⁻¹' {x}) = 0 := by
rw [← biUnion_preimage_singleton, measure_biUnion_null_iff hs]
/-- If `s` is a `Finset`, then the measure of its preimage can be found as the sum of measures
of the fibers `f ⁻¹' {y}`. -/
theorem sum_measure_preimage_singleton (s : Finset β) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ y ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {y})) : (∑ b ∈ s, μ (f ⁻¹' {b})) = μ (f ⁻¹' ↑s) := by
simp only [← measure_biUnion_finset (pairwiseDisjoint_fiber f s) hf,
Finset.set_biUnion_preimage_singleton]
@[simp] lemma sum_measure_singleton {s : Finset α} [MeasurableSingletonClass α] :
∑ x ∈ s, μ {x} = μ s := by
trans ∑ x ∈ s, μ (id ⁻¹' {x})
· simp
rw [sum_measure_preimage_singleton]
· simp
· simp
theorem measure_diff_null' (h : μ (s₁ ∩ s₂) = 0) : μ (s₁ \ s₂) = μ s₁ :=
measure_congr <| diff_ae_eq_self.2 h
theorem measure_add_diff (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (t : Set α) :
μ s + μ (t \ s) = μ (s ∪ t) := by
rw [← measure_union₀' hs disjoint_sdiff_right.aedisjoint, union_diff_self]
theorem measure_diff' (s : Set α) (hm : NullMeasurableSet t μ) (h_fin : μ t ≠ ∞) :
μ (s \ t) = μ (s ∪ t) - μ t :=
ENNReal.eq_sub_of_add_eq h_fin <| by rw [add_comm, measure_add_diff hm, union_comm]
theorem measure_diff (h : s₂ ⊆ s₁) (h₂ : NullMeasurableSet s₂ μ) (h_fin : μ s₂ ≠ ∞) :
μ (s₁ \ s₂) = μ s₁ - μ s₂ := by rw [measure_diff' _ h₂ h_fin, union_eq_self_of_subset_right h]
theorem le_measure_diff : μ s₁ - μ s₂ ≤ μ (s₁ \ s₂) :=
tsub_le_iff_left.2 <| (measure_le_inter_add_diff μ s₁ s₂).trans <| by
gcongr; apply inter_subset_right
/-- If the measure of the symmetric difference of two sets is finite,
then one has infinite measure if and only if the other one does. -/
theorem measure_eq_top_iff_of_symmDiff (hμst : μ (s ∆ t) ≠ ∞) : μ s = ∞ ↔ μ t = ∞ := by
suffices h : ∀ u v, μ (u ∆ v) ≠ ∞ → μ u = ∞ → μ v = ∞
from ⟨h s t hμst, h t s (symmDiff_comm s t ▸ hμst)⟩
intro u v hμuv hμu
by_contra! hμv
apply hμuv
rw [Set.symmDiff_def, eq_top_iff]
calc
∞ = μ u - μ v := by rw [ENNReal.sub_eq_top_iff.2 ⟨hμu, hμv⟩]
_ ≤ μ (u \ v) := le_measure_diff
_ ≤ μ (u \ v ∪ v \ u) := measure_mono subset_union_left
/-- If the measure of the symmetric difference of two sets is finite,
then one has finite measure if and only if the other one does. -/
theorem measure_ne_top_iff_of_symmDiff (hμst : μ (s ∆ t) ≠ ∞) : μ s ≠ ∞ ↔ μ t ≠ ∞ :=
(measure_eq_top_iff_of_symmDiff hμst).ne
theorem measure_diff_lt_of_lt_add (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs' : μ s ≠ ∞)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} (h : μ t < μ s + ε) : μ (t \ s) < ε := by
rw [measure_diff hst hs hs']; rw [add_comm] at h
exact ENNReal.sub_lt_of_lt_add (measure_mono hst) h
theorem measure_diff_le_iff_le_add (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs' : μ s ≠ ∞)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} : μ (t \ s) ≤ ε ↔ μ t ≤ μ s + ε := by
rw [measure_diff hst hs hs', tsub_le_iff_left]
theorem measure_eq_measure_of_null_diff {s t : Set α} (hst : s ⊆ t) (h_nulldiff : μ (t \ s) = 0) :
μ s = μ t := measure_congr <|
EventuallyLE.antisymm (HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE hst) (ae_le_set.mpr h_nulldiff)
theorem measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃)
(h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₁ = μ s₂ ∧ μ s₂ = μ s₃ := by
have le12 : μ s₁ ≤ μ s₂ := measure_mono h12
have le23 : μ s₂ ≤ μ s₃ := measure_mono h23
have key : μ s₃ ≤ μ s₁ :=
calc
μ s₃ = μ (s₃ \ s₁ ∪ s₁) := by rw [diff_union_of_subset (h12.trans h23)]
_ ≤ μ (s₃ \ s₁) + μ s₁ := measure_union_le _ _
_ = μ s₁ := by simp only [h_nulldiff, zero_add]
exact ⟨le12.antisymm (le23.trans key), le23.antisymm (key.trans le12)⟩
theorem measure_eq_measure_smaller_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃) (h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₁ = μ s₂ :=
(measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff h12 h23 h_nulldiff).1
theorem measure_eq_measure_larger_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃) (h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₂ = μ s₃ :=
(measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff h12 h23 h_nulldiff).2
lemma measure_compl₀ (h : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) :
μ sᶜ = μ Set.univ - μ s := by
rw [← measure_add_measure_compl₀ h, ENNReal.add_sub_cancel_left hs]
theorem measure_compl (h₁ : MeasurableSet s) (h_fin : μ s ≠ ∞) : μ sᶜ = μ univ - μ s :=
measure_compl₀ h₁.nullMeasurableSet h_fin
lemma measure_inter_conull' (ht : μ (s \ t) = 0) : μ (s ∩ t) = μ s := by
rw [← diff_compl, measure_diff_null']; rwa [← diff_eq]
lemma measure_inter_conull (ht : μ tᶜ = 0) : μ (s ∩ t) = μ s := by
rw [← diff_compl, measure_diff_null ht]
@[simp]
theorem union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset : (s ∪ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] s ↔ t ≤ᵐ[μ] s := by
rw [ae_le_set]
refine
⟨fun h => by simpa only [union_diff_left] using (ae_eq_set.mp h).1, fun h =>
eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff.mpr
⟨by rwa [ae_le_set, union_diff_left],
HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE subset_union_left⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem union_ae_eq_right_iff_ae_subset : (s ∪ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] t ↔ s ≤ᵐ[μ] t := by
rw [union_comm, union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset]
theorem ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge (h₁ : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) (h₂ : μ t ≤ μ s)
(hsm : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : s =ᵐ[μ] t := by
| refine eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff.mpr ⟨h₁, ae_le_set.mpr ?_⟩
replace h₂ : μ t = μ s := h₂.antisymm (measure_mono_ae h₁)
replace ht : μ s ≠ ∞ := h₂ ▸ ht
rw [measure_diff' t hsm ht, measure_congr (union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset.mpr h₁), h₂, tsub_self]
/-- If `s ⊆ t`, `μ t ≤ μ s`, `μ t ≠ ∞`, and `s` is measurable, then `s =ᵐ[μ] t`. -/
theorem ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge (h₁ : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : μ t ≤ μ s) (hsm : NullMeasurableSet s μ)
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/MeasureSpace.lean | 319 | 325 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Markus Himmel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Markus Himmel
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Opposite
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Operations
/-!
# The opposite of a set
The opposite of a set `s` is simply the set obtained by taking the opposite of each member of `s`.
-/
variable {α : Type*}
open Opposite
namespace Set
/-- The opposite of a set `s` is the set obtained by taking the opposite of each member of `s`. -/
protected def op (s : Set α) : Set αᵒᵖ :=
unop ⁻¹' s
/-- The unop of a set `s` is the set obtained by taking the unop of each member of `s`. -/
protected def unop (s : Set αᵒᵖ) : Set α :=
op ⁻¹' s
@[simp]
theorem mem_op {s : Set α} {a : αᵒᵖ} : a ∈ s.op ↔ unop a ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp 1100]
theorem op_mem_op {s : Set α} {a : α} : op a ∈ s.op ↔ a ∈ s := by rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_unop {s : Set αᵒᵖ} {a : α} : a ∈ s.unop ↔ op a ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp 1100]
theorem unop_mem_unop {s : Set αᵒᵖ} {a : αᵒᵖ} : unop a ∈ s.unop ↔ a ∈ s := by rfl
@[simp]
theorem op_unop (s : Set α) : s.op.unop = s := rfl
@[simp]
theorem unop_op (s : Set αᵒᵖ) : s.unop.op = s := rfl
/-- The members of the opposite of a set are in bijection with the members of the set itself. -/
@[simps]
def opEquiv_self (s : Set α) : s.op ≃ s :=
⟨fun x ↦ ⟨unop x, x.2⟩, fun x ↦ ⟨op x, x.2⟩, fun _ ↦ rfl, fun _ ↦ rfl⟩
/-- Taking opposites as an equivalence of powersets. -/
@[simps]
def opEquiv : Set α ≃ Set αᵒᵖ :=
⟨Set.op, Set.unop, op_unop, unop_op⟩
@[simp]
theorem singleton_op (x : α) : ({x} : Set α).op = {op x} := by
ext
constructor
· apply unop_injective
· apply op_injective
@[simp]
theorem singleton_unop (x : αᵒᵖ) : ({x} : Set αᵒᵖ).unop = {unop x} := by
ext
constructor
· apply op_injective
· apply unop_injective
@[simp 1100]
theorem singleton_op_unop (x : α) : ({op x} : Set αᵒᵖ).unop = {x} := by
ext
| constructor
· apply op_injective
· apply unop_injective
@[simp 1100]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Opposite.lean | 76 | 80 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Peter Pfaffelhuber, Yaël Dillies, Kin Yau James Wong
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Constructions
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.PiSystem
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions
/-!
# π-systems of cylinders and square cylinders
The instance `MeasurableSpace.pi` on `∀ i, α i`, where each `α i` has a `MeasurableSpace` `m i`,
is defined as `⨆ i, (m i).comap (fun a => a i)`.
That is, a function `g : β → ∀ i, α i` is measurable iff for all `i`, the function `b ↦ g b i`
is measurable.
We define two π-systems generating `MeasurableSpace.pi`, cylinders and square cylinders.
## Main definitions
Given a finite set `s` of indices, a cylinder is the product of a set of `∀ i : s, α i` and of
`univ` on the other indices. A square cylinder is a cylinder for which the set on `∀ i : s, α i` is
a product set.
* `cylinder s S`: cylinder with base set `S : Set (∀ i : s, α i)` where `s` is a `Finset`
* `squareCylinders C` with `C : ∀ i, Set (Set (α i))`: set of all square cylinders such that for
all `i` in the finset defining the box, the projection to `α i` belongs to `C i`. The main
application of this is with `C i = {s : Set (α i) | MeasurableSet s}`.
* `measurableCylinders`: set of all cylinders with measurable base sets.
* `cylinderEvents Δ`: The σ-algebra of cylinder events on `Δ`. It is the smallest σ-algebra making
the projections on the `i`-th coordinate continuous for all `i ∈ Δ`.
## Main statements
* `generateFrom_squareCylinders`: square cylinders formed from measurable sets generate the product
σ-algebra
* `generateFrom_measurableCylinders`: cylinders formed from measurable sets generate the
product σ-algebra
-/
open Function Set
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {ι : Type _} {α : ι → Type _}
section squareCylinders
/-- Given a finite set `s` of indices, a square cylinder is the product of a set `S` of
`∀ i : s, α i` and of `univ` on the other indices. The set `S` is a product of sets `t i` such that
for all `i : s`, `t i ∈ C i`.
`squareCylinders` is the set of all such squareCylinders. -/
def squareCylinders (C : ∀ i, Set (Set (α i))) : Set (Set (∀ i, α i)) :=
{S | ∃ s : Finset ι, ∃ t ∈ univ.pi C, S = (s : Set ι).pi t}
theorem squareCylinders_eq_iUnion_image (C : ∀ i, Set (Set (α i))) :
squareCylinders C = ⋃ s : Finset ι, (fun t ↦ (s : Set ι).pi t) '' univ.pi C := by
ext1 f
simp only [squareCylinders, mem_iUnion, mem_image, mem_univ_pi, exists_prop, mem_setOf_eq,
eq_comm (a := f)]
theorem isPiSystem_squareCylinders {C : ∀ i, Set (Set (α i))} (hC : ∀ i, IsPiSystem (C i))
(hC_univ : ∀ i, univ ∈ C i) :
IsPiSystem (squareCylinders C) := by
rintro S₁ ⟨s₁, t₁, h₁, rfl⟩ S₂ ⟨s₂, t₂, h₂, rfl⟩ hst_nonempty
classical
let t₁' := s₁.piecewise t₁ (fun i ↦ univ)
let t₂' := s₂.piecewise t₂ (fun i ↦ univ)
have h1 : ∀ i ∈ (s₁ : Set ι), t₁ i = t₁' i :=
fun i hi ↦ (Finset.piecewise_eq_of_mem _ _ _ hi).symm
have h1' : ∀ i ∉ (s₁ : Set ι), t₁' i = univ :=
fun i hi ↦ Finset.piecewise_eq_of_not_mem _ _ _ hi
have h2 : ∀ i ∈ (s₂ : Set ι), t₂ i = t₂' i :=
fun i hi ↦ (Finset.piecewise_eq_of_mem _ _ _ hi).symm
have h2' : ∀ i ∉ (s₂ : Set ι), t₂' i = univ :=
fun i hi ↦ Finset.piecewise_eq_of_not_mem _ _ _ hi
rw [Set.pi_congr rfl h1, Set.pi_congr rfl h2, ← union_pi_inter h1' h2']
refine ⟨s₁ ∪ s₂, fun i ↦ t₁' i ∩ t₂' i, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [mem_univ_pi]
intro i
have : (t₁' i ∩ t₂' i).Nonempty := by
obtain ⟨f, hf⟩ := hst_nonempty
rw [Set.pi_congr rfl h1, Set.pi_congr rfl h2, mem_inter_iff, mem_pi, mem_pi] at hf
refine ⟨f i, ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· by_cases hi₁ : i ∈ s₁
· exact hf.1 i hi₁
· rw [h1' i hi₁]
exact mem_univ _
· by_cases hi₂ : i ∈ s₂
· exact hf.2 i hi₂
· rw [h2' i hi₂]
exact mem_univ _
refine hC i _ ?_ _ ?_ this
· by_cases hi₁ : i ∈ s₁
· rw [← h1 i hi₁]
exact h₁ i (mem_univ _)
· rw [h1' i hi₁]
exact hC_univ i
· by_cases hi₂ : i ∈ s₂
· rw [← h2 i hi₂]
exact h₂ i (mem_univ _)
· rw [h2' i hi₂]
exact hC_univ i
· rw [Finset.coe_union]
theorem comap_eval_le_generateFrom_squareCylinders_singleton
(α : ι → Type*) [m : ∀ i, MeasurableSpace (α i)] (i : ι) :
MeasurableSpace.comap (Function.eval i) (m i) ≤
MeasurableSpace.generateFrom
((fun t ↦ ({i} : Set ι).pi t) '' univ.pi fun i ↦ {s : Set (α i) | MeasurableSet s}) := by
simp only [Function.eval, singleton_pi]
rw [MeasurableSpace.comap_eq_generateFrom]
refine MeasurableSpace.generateFrom_mono fun S ↦ ?_
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, mem_image, mem_univ_pi, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
intro t ht h
classical
refine ⟨fun j ↦ if hji : j = i then by convert t else univ, fun j ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· by_cases hji : j = i
· simp only [hji, eq_self_iff_true, eq_mpr_eq_cast, dif_pos]
convert ht
simp only [id_eq, cast_heq]
· simp only [hji, not_false_iff, dif_neg, MeasurableSet.univ]
· simp only [id_eq, eq_mpr_eq_cast, ← h]
ext1 x
simp only [singleton_pi, Function.eval, cast_eq, dite_eq_ite, ite_true, mem_preimage]
/-- The square cylinders formed from measurable sets generate the product σ-algebra. -/
theorem generateFrom_squareCylinders [∀ i, MeasurableSpace (α i)] :
MeasurableSpace.generateFrom (squareCylinders fun i ↦ {s : Set (α i) | MeasurableSet s}) =
MeasurableSpace.pi := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [MeasurableSpace.generateFrom_le_iff]
rintro S ⟨s, t, h, rfl⟩
simp only [mem_univ_pi, mem_setOf_eq] at h
exact MeasurableSet.pi (Finset.countable_toSet _) (fun i _ ↦ h i)
· refine iSup_le fun i ↦ ?_
refine (comap_eval_le_generateFrom_squareCylinders_singleton α i).trans ?_
refine MeasurableSpace.generateFrom_mono ?_
rw [← Finset.coe_singleton, squareCylinders_eq_iUnion_image]
exact subset_iUnion
(fun (s : Finset ι) ↦
(fun t : ∀ i, Set (α i) ↦ (s : Set ι).pi t) '' univ.pi (fun i ↦ setOf MeasurableSet))
({i} : Finset ι)
end squareCylinders
section cylinder
/-- Given a finite set `s` of indices, a cylinder is the preimage of a set `S` of `∀ i : s, α i` by
the projection from `∀ i, α i` to `∀ i : s, α i`. -/
def cylinder (s : Finset ι) (S : Set (∀ i : s, α i)) : Set (∀ i, α i) :=
s.restrict ⁻¹' S
@[simp]
theorem mem_cylinder (s : Finset ι) (S : Set (∀ i : s, α i)) (f : ∀ i, α i) :
f ∈ cylinder s S ↔ s.restrict f ∈ S :=
mem_preimage
@[simp]
theorem cylinder_empty (s : Finset ι) : cylinder s (∅ : Set (∀ i : s, α i)) = ∅ := by
rw [cylinder, preimage_empty]
@[simp]
theorem cylinder_univ (s : Finset ι) : cylinder s (univ : Set (∀ i : s, α i)) = univ := by
rw [cylinder, preimage_univ]
@[simp]
theorem cylinder_eq_empty_iff [h_nonempty : Nonempty (∀ i, α i)] (s : Finset ι)
(S : Set (∀ i : s, α i)) :
cylinder s S = ∅ ↔ S = ∅ := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ by (rw [h]; exact cylinder_empty _)⟩
by_contra hS
rw [← Ne, ← nonempty_iff_ne_empty] at hS
let f := hS.some
have hf : f ∈ S := hS.choose_spec
classical
let f' : ∀ i, α i := fun i ↦ if hi : i ∈ s then f ⟨i, hi⟩ else h_nonempty.some i
have hf' : f' ∈ cylinder s S := by
rw [mem_cylinder]
simpa only [Finset.restrict_def, Finset.coe_mem, dif_pos, f']
rw [h] at hf'
exact not_mem_empty _ hf'
theorem inter_cylinder (s₁ s₂ : Finset ι) (S₁ : Set (∀ i : s₁, α i)) (S₂ : Set (∀ i : s₂, α i))
[DecidableEq ι] :
cylinder s₁ S₁ ∩ cylinder s₂ S₂ =
cylinder (s₁ ∪ s₂)
(Finset.restrict₂ Finset.subset_union_left ⁻¹' S₁ ∩
Finset.restrict₂ Finset.subset_union_right ⁻¹' S₂) := by
ext1 f; simp only [mem_inter_iff, mem_cylinder, mem_setOf_eq]; rfl
theorem inter_cylinder_same (s : Finset ι) (S₁ : Set (∀ i : s, α i)) (S₂ : Set (∀ i : s, α i)) :
cylinder s S₁ ∩ cylinder s S₂ = cylinder s (S₁ ∩ S₂) := by
classical rw [inter_cylinder]; rfl
theorem union_cylinder (s₁ s₂ : Finset ι) (S₁ : Set (∀ i : s₁, α i)) (S₂ : Set (∀ i : s₂, α i))
[DecidableEq ι] :
cylinder s₁ S₁ ∪ cylinder s₂ S₂ =
cylinder (s₁ ∪ s₂)
(Finset.restrict₂ Finset.subset_union_left ⁻¹' S₁ ∪
Finset.restrict₂ Finset.subset_union_right ⁻¹' S₂) := by
ext1 f; simp only [mem_union, mem_cylinder, mem_setOf_eq]; rfl
theorem union_cylinder_same (s : Finset ι) (S₁ : Set (∀ i : s, α i)) (S₂ : Set (∀ i : s, α i)) :
cylinder s S₁ ∪ cylinder s S₂ = cylinder s (S₁ ∪ S₂) := by
classical rw [union_cylinder]; rfl
theorem compl_cylinder (s : Finset ι) (S : Set (∀ i : s, α i)) :
(cylinder s S)ᶜ = cylinder s (Sᶜ) := by
ext1 f; simp only [mem_compl_iff, mem_cylinder]
theorem diff_cylinder_same (s : Finset ι) (S T : Set (∀ i : s, α i)) :
cylinder s S \ cylinder s T = cylinder s (S \ T) := by
ext1 f; simp only [mem_diff, mem_cylinder]
|
theorem eq_of_cylinder_eq_of_subset [h_nonempty : Nonempty (∀ i, α i)] {I J : Finset ι}
{S : Set (∀ i : I, α i)} {T : Set (∀ i : J, α i)} (h_eq : cylinder I S = cylinder J T)
(hJI : J ⊆ I) :
S = Finset.restrict₂ hJI ⁻¹' T := by
rw [Set.ext_iff] at h_eq
simp only [mem_cylinder] at h_eq
ext1 f
simp only [mem_preimage]
classical
specialize h_eq fun i ↦ if hi : i ∈ I then f ⟨i, hi⟩ else h_nonempty.some i
have h_mem : ∀ j : J, ↑j ∈ I := fun j ↦ hJI j.prop
simpa only [Finset.restrict_def, Finset.coe_mem, dite_true, h_mem] using h_eq
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Constructions/Cylinders.lean | 217 | 229 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Sophie Morel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sophie Morel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Constructions
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.CPolynomialDef
/-! # Properties of continuously polynomial functions
We expand the API around continuously polynomial functions. Notably, we show that this class is
stable under the usual operations (addition, subtraction, negation).
We also prove that continuous multilinear maps are continuously polynomial, and so
are continuous linear maps into continuous multilinear maps. In particular, such maps are
analytic.
-/
variable {𝕜 E F G : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
open scoped Topology
open Set Filter Asymptotics NNReal ENNReal
variable {f g : E → F} {p pf pg : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F} {x : E} {r r' : ℝ≥0∞} {n m : ℕ}
theorem hasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall_const {c : F} {e : E} :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall (fun _ => c) (constFormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E c) e 1 ⊤ :=
⟨hasFPowerSeriesOnBall_const, fun n hn ↦ constFormalMultilinearSeries_apply (id hn : 0 < n).ne'⟩
theorem hasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt_const {c : F} {e : E} :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt (fun _ => c) (constFormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E c) e 1 :=
⟨⊤, hasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall_const⟩
theorem CPolynomialAt_const {v : F} : CPolynomialAt 𝕜 (fun _ => v) x :=
⟨constFormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E v, 1, hasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt_const⟩
theorem CPolynomialOn_const {v : F} {s : Set E} : CPolynomialOn 𝕜 (fun _ => v) s :=
fun _ _ => CPolynomialAt_const
theorem HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall.add (hf : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall f pf x n r)
(hg : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall g pg x m r) :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall (f + g) (pf + pg) x (max n m) r :=
⟨hf.1.add hg.1, fun N hN ↦ by
rw [Pi.add_apply, hf.finite _ ((le_max_left n m).trans hN),
hg.finite _ ((le_max_right n m).trans hN), zero_add]⟩
theorem HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt.add (hf : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt f pf x n)
(hg : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt g pg x m) :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt (f + g) (pf + pg) x (max n m) := by
rcases (hf.eventually.and hg.eventually).exists with ⟨r, hr⟩
exact ⟨r, hr.1.add hr.2⟩
theorem CPolynomialAt.add (hf : CPolynomialAt 𝕜 f x) (hg : CPolynomialAt 𝕜 g x) :
CPolynomialAt 𝕜 (f + g) x :=
let ⟨_, _, hpf⟩ := hf
let ⟨_, _, hqf⟩ := hg
(hpf.add hqf).cpolynomialAt
theorem HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall.neg (hf : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall f pf x n r) :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall (-f) (-pf) x n r :=
⟨hf.1.neg, fun m hm ↦ by rw [Pi.neg_apply, hf.finite m hm, neg_zero]⟩
theorem HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt.neg (hf : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt f pf x n) :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt (-f) (-pf) x n :=
let ⟨_, hrf⟩ := hf
hrf.neg.hasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt
theorem CPolynomialAt.neg (hf : CPolynomialAt 𝕜 f x) : CPolynomialAt 𝕜 (-f) x :=
let ⟨_, _, hpf⟩ := hf
hpf.neg.cpolynomialAt
theorem HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall.sub (hf : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall f pf x n r)
(hg : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall g pg x m r) :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall (f - g) (pf - pg) x (max n m) r := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add hg.neg
theorem HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt.sub (hf : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt f pf x n)
(hg : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt g pg x m) :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesAt (f - g) (pf - pg) x (max n m) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add hg.neg
theorem CPolynomialAt.sub (hf : CPolynomialAt 𝕜 f x) (hg : CPolynomialAt 𝕜 g x) :
CPolynomialAt 𝕜 (f - g) x := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add hg.neg
theorem CPolynomialOn.add {s : Set E} (hf : CPolynomialOn 𝕜 f s) (hg : CPolynomialOn 𝕜 g s) :
CPolynomialOn 𝕜 (f + g) s :=
fun z hz => (hf z hz).add (hg z hz)
theorem CPolynomialOn.sub {s : Set E} (hf : CPolynomialOn 𝕜 f s) (hg : CPolynomialOn 𝕜 g s) :
CPolynomialOn 𝕜 (f - g) s :=
fun z hz => (hf z hz).sub (hg z hz)
/-!
### Continuous multilinear maps
We show that continuous multilinear maps are continuously polynomial, and therefore analytic.
-/
namespace ContinuousMultilinearMap
variable {ι : Type*} {Em : ι → Type*} [∀ i, NormedAddCommGroup (Em i)] [∀ i, NormedSpace 𝕜 (Em i)]
[Fintype ι] (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 Em F) {x : Π i, Em i} {s : Set (Π i, Em i)}
open FormalMultilinearSeries
protected theorem hasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall f f.toFormalMultilinearSeries 0 (Fintype.card ι + 1) ⊤ :=
.mk' (fun _ hm ↦ dif_neg (Nat.succ_le_iff.mp hm).ne) ENNReal.zero_lt_top fun y _ ↦ by
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem _ (Finset.self_mem_range_succ _), zero_add]
· rw [toFormalMultilinearSeries, dif_pos rfl]; rfl
· intro m _ ne; rw [toFormalMultilinearSeries, dif_neg ne.symm]; rfl
lemma cpolynomialAt : CPolynomialAt 𝕜 f x :=
f.hasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall.cpolynomialAt_of_mem
(by simp only [Metric.emetric_ball_top, Set.mem_univ])
lemma cpolynomialOn : CPolynomialOn 𝕜 f s := fun _ _ ↦ f.cpolynomialAt
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias cpolyomialOn := cpolynomialOn
lemma analyticOnNhd : AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 f s := f.cpolynomialOn.analyticOnNhd
lemma analyticOn : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s := f.analyticOnNhd.analyticOn
lemma analyticAt : AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x := f.cpolynomialAt.analyticAt
lemma analyticWithinAt : AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 f s x := f.analyticAt.analyticWithinAt
end ContinuousMultilinearMap
/-!
### Continuous linear maps into continuous multilinear maps
We show that a continuous linear map into continuous multilinear maps is continuously polynomial
(as a function of two variables, i.e., uncurried). Therefore, it is also analytic.
-/
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
variable {ι : Type*} {Em : ι → Type*} [∀ i, NormedAddCommGroup (Em i)] [∀ i, NormedSpace 𝕜 (Em i)]
[Fintype ι] (f : G →L[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 Em F)
{s : Set (G × (Π i, Em i))} {x : G × (Π i, Em i)}
/-- Formal multilinear series associated to a linear map into multilinear maps. -/
noncomputable def toFormalMultilinearSeriesOfMultilinear :
FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 (G × (Π i, Em i)) F :=
fun n ↦ if h : Fintype.card (Option ι) = n then
(f.continuousMultilinearMapOption).domDomCongr (Fintype.equivFinOfCardEq h)
else 0
protected theorem hasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall_uncurry_of_multilinear :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall (fun (p : G × (Π i, Em i)) ↦ f p.1 p.2)
f.toFormalMultilinearSeriesOfMultilinear 0 (Fintype.card (Option ι) + 1) ⊤ := by
apply HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall.mk' ?_ ENNReal.zero_lt_top ?_
· intro m hm
apply dif_neg
exact Nat.ne_of_lt hm
· intro y _
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem _ (Finset.self_mem_range_succ _), zero_add]
· rw [toFormalMultilinearSeriesOfMultilinear, dif_pos rfl]; rfl
· intro m _ ne; rw [toFormalMultilinearSeriesOfMultilinear, dif_neg ne.symm]; rfl
lemma cpolynomialAt_uncurry_of_multilinear :
CPolynomialAt 𝕜 (fun (p : G × (Π i, Em i)) ↦ f p.1 p.2) x :=
f.hasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall_uncurry_of_multilinear.cpolynomialAt_of_mem
(by simp only [Metric.emetric_ball_top, Set.mem_univ])
lemma cpolyomialOn_uncurry_of_multilinear :
CPolynomialOn 𝕜 (fun (p : G × (Π i, Em i)) ↦ f p.1 p.2) s :=
fun _ _ ↦ f.cpolynomialAt_uncurry_of_multilinear
lemma analyticOnNhd_uncurry_of_multilinear :
AnalyticOnNhd 𝕜 (fun (p : G × (Π i, Em i)) ↦ f p.1 p.2) s :=
f.cpolyomialOn_uncurry_of_multilinear.analyticOnNhd
lemma analyticOn_uncurry_of_multilinear :
AnalyticOn 𝕜 (fun (p : G × (Π i, Em i)) ↦ f p.1 p.2) s :=
f.analyticOnNhd_uncurry_of_multilinear.analyticOn
lemma analyticAt_uncurry_of_multilinear : AnalyticAt 𝕜 (fun (p : G × (Π i, Em i)) ↦ f p.1 p.2) x :=
f.cpolynomialAt_uncurry_of_multilinear.analyticAt
lemma analyticWithinAt_uncurry_of_multilinear :
AnalyticWithinAt 𝕜 (fun (p : G × (Π i, Em i)) ↦ f p.1 p.2) s x :=
f.analyticAt_uncurry_of_multilinear.analyticWithinAt
end ContinuousLinearMap
| Mathlib/Analysis/Analytic/CPolynomial.lean | 338 | 339 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Mitchell Lee. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mitchell Lee, Junyan Xu
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.TensorProduct.RightExactness
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.TensorProduct.Finiteness
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.DirectSum.Finsupp
/-! # Vanishing of elements in a tensor product of two modules
Let $M$ and $N$ be modules over a commutative ring $R$. Recall that every element of $M \otimes N$
can be written as a finite sum $\sum_{i} m_i \otimes n_i$ of pure tensors
(`TensorProduct.exists_finset`). We would like to determine under what circumstances such an
expression vanishes.
Let us say that an expression $\sum_{i \in \iota} m_i \otimes n_i$ in $M \otimes N$
*vanishes trivially* (`TensorProduct.VanishesTrivially`) if there exist a finite index type
$\kappa$ = `Fin k`, elements $(y_j)_{j \in \kappa}$ of $N$, and elements
$(a_{ij})_{i \in \iota, j \in \kappa}$ of $R$ such that for all $i$,
$$n_i = \sum_j a_{ij} y_j$$
and for all $j$,
$$\sum_i a_{ij} m_i = 0.$$
(The terminology "trivial" comes from [Stacks 00HK](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00HK).)
It is not difficult to show (`TensorProduct.sum_tmul_eq_zero_of_vanishesTrivially`) that if
$\sum_i m_i \otimes n_i$ vanishes trivially, then it vanishes; that is,
$\sum_i m_i \otimes n_i = 0$.
The *equational criterion for vanishing* (`TensorProduct.vanishesTrivially_iff_sum_tmul_eq_zero`),
which appears as
[A. Altman and S. Kleiman, *A term of commutative algebra* (Lemma 8.16)][altman2021term],
states that if the elements $m_i$ generate the module $M$, then $\sum_i m_i \otimes n_i = 0$ if and
only if the expression $\sum_i m_i \otimes n_i$ vanishes trivially.
We also prove the following generalization
(`TensorProduct.vanishesTrivially_iff_sum_tmul_eq_zero_of_rTensor_injective`). If the submodule
$M' \subseteq M$ generated by the $m_i$ satisfies the property that the induced map
$M' \otimes N \to M \otimes N$ is injective, then $\sum_i m_i \otimes n_i = 0$ if and only if the
expression $\sum_i m_i \otimes n_i$ vanishes trivially. (In the case that $M = R$, this yields the
*equational criterion for flatness* `Module.Flat.iff_forall_isTrivialRelation`.)
Conversely (`TensorProduct.rTensor_injective_of_forall_vanishesTrivially`),
suppose that for every equation $\sum_i m_i \otimes n_i = 0$, the expression
$\sum_i m_i \otimes n_i$ vanishes trivially. Then the induced map $M' \otimes N \to M \otimes N$
is injective for every submodule $M' \subseteq M$.
## References
* [A. Altman and S. Kleiman, *A term of commutative algebra* (Lemma 8.16)][altman2021term]
## TODO
* Prove the same theorems with $M$ and $N$ swapped.
-/
variable (R : Type*) [CommRing R]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable {N : Type*} [AddCommGroup N] [Module R N]
open DirectSum LinearMap Function Submodule Finsupp
namespace TensorProduct
variable {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {m : ι → M} {n : ι → N}
variable (m n) in
/-- An expression $\sum_i m_i \otimes n_i$ in $M \otimes N$
*vanishes trivially* if there exist a finite index type $\kappa$ = `Fin k`,
elements $(y_j)_{j \in \kappa}$ of $N$, and elements $(a_{ij})_{i \in \iota, j \in \kappa}$ of $R$
such that for all $i$,
$$n_i = \sum_j a_{ij} y_j$$
and for all $j$,
$$\sum_i a_{ij} m_i = 0.$$
Note that this condition is not symmetric in $M$ and $N$.
(The terminology "trivial" comes from [Stacks 00HK](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00HK).) -/
abbrev VanishesTrivially : Prop :=
∃ (k : ℕ) (a : ι → Fin k → R) (y : Fin k → N),
(∀ i, n i = ∑ j, a i j • y j) ∧ ∀ j, ∑ i, a i j • m i = 0
variable {R}
theorem VanishesTrivially.of_fintype {κ} [Fintype κ] (a : ι → κ → R) (y : κ → N)
(hay : ∀ i, n i = ∑ j, a i j • y j) (ham : ∀ j, ∑ i, a i j • m i = 0) :
VanishesTrivially R m n :=
have e := (Fintype.equivFin κ).symm
⟨Fintype.card κ, (a · ∘ e), y ∘ e, by simpa only [← e.sum_comp] using hay, by
rwa [← e.forall_congr_right] at ham⟩
theorem _root_.Equiv.vanishesTrivially_comp {κ} [Fintype κ] (e : κ ≃ ι) :
VanishesTrivially R (m ∘ e) (n ∘ e) ↔ VanishesTrivially R m n := by
simp [VanishesTrivially, ← e.forall_congr_right,
← (e.arrowCongr (.refl _)).exists_congr_right, ← e.sum_comp]
variable (R)
/-- **Equational criterion for vanishing**
[A. Altman and S. Kleiman, *A term of commutative algebra* (Lemma 8.16)][altman2021term],
backward direction.
If the expression $\sum_i m_i \otimes n_i$ vanishes trivially, then it vanishes.
That is, $\sum_i m_i \otimes n_i = 0$. -/
theorem sum_tmul_eq_zero_of_vanishesTrivially (hmn : VanishesTrivially R m n) :
∑ i, m i ⊗ₜ n i = (0 : M ⊗[R] N) := by
obtain ⟨k, a, y, h₁, h₂⟩ := hmn
simp_rw [h₁, tmul_sum, tmul_smul]
rw [Finset.sum_comm]
simp_rw [← tmul_smul, ← smul_tmul, ← sum_tmul, h₂, zero_tmul, Finset.sum_const_zero]
/-- **Equational criterion for vanishing**
[A. Altman and S. Kleiman, *A term of commutative algebra* (Lemma 8.16)][altman2021term],
forward direction.
Assume that the $m_i$ generate $M$. If the expression $\sum_i m_i \otimes n_i$
vanishes, then it vanishes trivially. -/
theorem vanishesTrivially_of_sum_tmul_eq_zero (hm : Submodule.span R (Set.range m) = ⊤)
(hmn : ∑ i, m i ⊗ₜ n i = (0 : M ⊗[R] N)) : VanishesTrivially R m n := by
-- Define a map $G \colon R^\iota \to M$ whose matrix entries are the $m_i$. It is surjective.
set G : (ι →₀ R) →ₗ[R] M := Finsupp.linearCombination R m with hG
have G_basis_eq (i : ι) : G (Finsupp.single i 1) = m i := by simp [hG, toModule_lof]
have G_surjective : Surjective G := by
apply LinearMap.range_eq_top.mp
apply top_le_iff.mp
rw [← hm]
apply Submodule.span_le.mpr
rintro _ ⟨i, rfl⟩
use Finsupp.single i 1, G_basis_eq i
/- Consider the element $\sum_i e_i \otimes n_i$ of $R^\iota \otimes N$. It is in the kernel of
$R^\iota \otimes N \to M \otimes N$. -/
set en : (ι →₀ R) ⊗[R] N := ∑ i, Finsupp.single i 1 ⊗ₜ n i with hen
have en_mem_ker : en ∈ ker (rTensor N G) := by simp [hen, G_basis_eq, hmn]
-- We have an exact sequence $\ker G \to R^\iota \to M \to 0$.
have exact_ker_subtype : Exact (ker G).subtype G := G.exact_subtype_ker_map
-- Tensor the exact sequence with $N$.
have exact_rTensor_ker_subtype : Exact (rTensor N (ker G).subtype) (rTensor N G) :=
rTensor_exact (M := ↥(ker G)) N exact_ker_subtype G_surjective
/- We conclude that $\sum_i e_i \otimes n_i$ is in the range of
$\ker G \otimes N \to R^\iota \otimes N$. -/
have en_mem_range : en ∈ range (rTensor N (ker G).subtype) :=
exact_rTensor_ker_subtype.linearMap_ker_eq ▸ en_mem_ker
/- There is an element of in $\ker G \otimes N$ that maps to $\sum_i e_i \otimes n_i$.
Write it as a finite sum of pure tensors. -/
obtain ⟨kn, hkn⟩ := en_mem_range
obtain ⟨ma, rfl : kn = ∑ kj ∈ ma, kj.1 ⊗ₜ[R] kj.2⟩ := exists_finset kn
/- Let $\sum_j k_j \otimes y_j$ be the sum obtained in the previous step.
In order to show that $\sum_i m_i \otimes n_i$ vanishes trivially, it suffices to prove that there
exist $(a_{ij})_{i, j}$ such that for all $i$,
$$n_i = \sum_j a_{ij} y_j$$
and for all $j$,
$$\sum_i a_{ij} m_i = 0.$$
For this, take $a_{ij}$ to be the coefficient of $e_i$ in $k_j$. -/
refine .of_fintype (κ := ma) (fun i ⟨⟨kj, _⟩, _⟩ ↦ (kj : ι →₀ R) i) (fun ⟨⟨_, yj⟩, _⟩ ↦ yj) ?_ ?_
· intro i
classical
apply_fun finsuppScalarLeft R N ι at hkn
apply_fun (· i) at hkn
symm at hkn
simp only [map_sum, finsuppScalarLeft_apply_tmul, zero_smul, Finsupp.single_zero,
Finsupp.sum_single_index, one_smul, Finsupp.finset_sum_apply, Finsupp.single_apply,
Finset.sum_ite_eq', Finset.mem_univ, ↓reduceIte, rTensor_tmul, coe_subtype, Finsupp.sum_apply,
Finsupp.sum_ite_eq', Finsupp.mem_support_iff, ne_eq, ite_not, en] at hkn
simp only [Finset.univ_eq_attach, Finset.sum_attach ma (fun x ↦ (x.1 : ι →₀ R) i • x.2)]
convert hkn using 2 with x _
split
· next h'x => rw [h'x, zero_smul]
· rfl
· rintro ⟨⟨⟨k, hk⟩, _⟩, _⟩
simpa only [hG, linearCombination_apply, zero_smul, implies_true, Finsupp.sum_fintype] using
mem_ker.mp hk
/-- **Equational criterion for vanishing**
[A. Altman and S. Kleiman, *A term of commutative algebra* (Lemma 8.16)][altman2021term].
Assume that the $m_i$ generate $M$. Then the expression $\sum_i m_i \otimes n_i$ vanishes
trivially if and only if it vanishes. -/
theorem vanishesTrivially_iff_sum_tmul_eq_zero (hm : Submodule.span R (Set.range m) = ⊤) :
VanishesTrivially R m n ↔ ∑ i, m i ⊗ₜ n i = (0 : M ⊗[R] N) :=
⟨sum_tmul_eq_zero_of_vanishesTrivially R, vanishesTrivially_of_sum_tmul_eq_zero R hm⟩
/-- **Equational criterion for vanishing**
[A. Altman and S. Kleiman, *A term of commutative algebra* (Lemma 8.16)][altman2021term],
forward direction, generalization.
Assume that the submodule $M' \subseteq M$ generated by the $m_i$
satisfies the property that the map $M' \otimes N \to M \otimes N$ is injective. If the expression
$\sum_i m_i \otimes n_i$ vanishes, then it vanishes trivially. -/
theorem vanishesTrivially_of_sum_tmul_eq_zero_of_rTensor_injective
(hm : Injective (rTensor N (span R (Set.range m)).subtype))
(hmn : ∑ i, m i ⊗ₜ n i = (0 : M ⊗[R] N)) : VanishesTrivially R m n := by
-- Restrict `m` on the codomain to $M'$, then apply `vanishesTrivially_of_sum_tmul_eq_zero`.
have mem_M' i : m i ∈ span R (Set.range m) := subset_span ⟨i, rfl⟩
set m' : ι → span R (Set.range m) := Subtype.coind m mem_M' with m'_eq
have hm' : span R (Set.range m') = ⊤ := by
apply map_injective_of_injective (injective_subtype (span R (Set.range m)))
rw [Submodule.map_span, Submodule.map_top, range_subtype, coe_subtype, ← Set.range_comp]
rfl
have hm'n : ∑ i, m' i ⊗ₜ n i = (0 : span R (Set.range m) ⊗[R] N) := by
apply hm
simp only [m'_eq, map_sum, rTensor_tmul, coe_subtype, Subtype.coind_coe, map_zero, hmn]
have : VanishesTrivially R m' n := vanishesTrivially_of_sum_tmul_eq_zero R hm' hm'n
unfold VanishesTrivially at this ⊢
convert this with κ _ a y j
convert (injective_iff_map_eq_zero' _).mp (injective_subtype (span R (Set.range m))) _
simp [m'_eq]
/-- **Equational criterion for vanishing**
[A. Altman and S. Kleiman, *A term of commutative algebra* (Lemma 8.16)][altman2021term],
generalization.
Assume that the submodule $M' \subseteq M$ generated by the $m_i$ satisfies the
property that the map $M' \otimes N \to M \otimes N$ is injective. Then the expression
$\sum_i m_i \otimes n_i$ vanishes trivially if and only if it vanishes. -/
theorem vanishesTrivially_iff_sum_tmul_eq_zero_of_rTensor_injective
(hm : Injective (rTensor N (span R (Set.range m)).subtype)) :
VanishesTrivially R m n ↔ ∑ i, m i ⊗ₜ n i = (0 : M ⊗[R] N) :=
⟨sum_tmul_eq_zero_of_vanishesTrivially R,
vanishesTrivially_of_sum_tmul_eq_zero_of_rTensor_injective R hm⟩
/-- Converse of `TensorProduct.vanishesTrivially_of_sum_tmul_eq_zero_of_rTensor_injective`.
Assume that every expression $\sum_i m_i \otimes n_i$ which vanishes also vanishes trivially.
Then, for every submodule $M' \subseteq M$, the map $M' \otimes N \to M \otimes N$ is injective. -/
theorem rTensor_injective_of_forall_vanishesTrivially
(hMN : ∀ {l : ℕ} {m : Fin l → M} {n : Fin l → N},
∑ i, m i ⊗ₜ n i = (0 : M ⊗[R] N) → VanishesTrivially R m n)
(M' : Submodule R M) : Injective (rTensor N M'.subtype) := by
apply (injective_iff_map_eq_zero _).mpr
rintro x hx
obtain ⟨s, rfl⟩ := exists_finset x
rw [← Finset.sum_attach]
apply sum_tmul_eq_zero_of_vanishesTrivially
simp only [map_sum, rTensor_tmul, coe_subtype] at hx
have e := (Fintype.equivFin s).symm
rw [← Finset.sum_coe_sort, ← e.sum_comp] at hx
have := hMN hx
rw [← e.vanishesTrivially_comp]
unfold VanishesTrivially at this ⊢
convert this
symm
convert (injective_iff_map_eq_zero' _).mp (injective_subtype M') _
simp
| /-- Every expression $\sum_i m_i \otimes n_i$ which vanishes also vanishes trivially if and only if
for every submodule $M' \subseteq M$, the map $M' \otimes N \to M \otimes N$ is injective. -/
theorem forall_vanishesTrivially_iff_forall_rTensor_injective :
(∀ {l : ℕ} {m : Fin l → M} {n : Fin l → N},
∑ i, m i ⊗ₜ n i = (0 : M ⊗[R] N) → VanishesTrivially R m n) ↔
∀ M' : Submodule R M, Injective (rTensor N M'.subtype) := by
constructor
· intro h
exact rTensor_injective_of_forall_vanishesTrivially R h
· intro h k m n hmn
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/TensorProduct/Vanishing.lean | 243 | 252 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Minchao Wu, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Attach
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Disjoint
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Erase
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Filter
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Range
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.SDiff
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Order.Directed
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.SymmDiff
/-!
# Basic lemmas on finite sets
This file contains lemmas on the interaction of various definitions on the `Finset` type.
For an explanation of `Finset` design decisions, please see `Mathlib/Data/Finset/Defs.lean`.
## Main declarations
### Main definitions
* `Finset.choose`: Given a proof `h` of existence and uniqueness of a certain element
satisfying a predicate, `choose s h` returns the element of `s` satisfying that predicate.
### Equivalences between finsets
* The `Mathlib/Logic/Equiv/Defs.lean` file describes a general type of equivalence, so look in there
for any lemmas. There is some API for rewriting sums and products from `s` to `t` given that
`s ≃ t`.
TODO: examples
## Tags
finite sets, finset
-/
-- Assert that we define `Finset` without the material on `List.sublists`.
-- Note that we cannot use `List.sublists` itself as that is defined very early.
assert_not_exists List.sublistsLen Multiset.powerset CompleteLattice Monoid
open Multiset Subtype Function
universe u
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
namespace Finset
-- TODO: these should be global attributes, but this will require fixing other files
attribute [local trans] Subset.trans Superset.trans
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {s : Finset α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf s := by
cases s
dsimp [SizeOf.sizeOf, SizeOf.sizeOf, Multiset.sizeOf]
rw [Nat.add_comm]
refine lt_trans ?_ (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
exact Multiset.sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem hx
/-! ### Lattice structure -/
section Lattice
variable [DecidableEq α] {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-! #### union -/
@[simp]
theorem disjUnion_eq_union (s t h) : @disjUnion α s t h = s ∪ t :=
ext fun a => by simp
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_union_left : Disjoint (s ∪ t) u ↔ Disjoint s u ∧ Disjoint t u := by
simp only [disjoint_left, mem_union, or_imp, forall_and]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_union_right : Disjoint s (t ∪ u) ↔ Disjoint s t ∧ Disjoint s u := by
simp only [disjoint_right, mem_union, or_imp, forall_and]
/-! #### inter -/
theorem not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter : ¬Disjoint s t ↔ (s ∩ t).Nonempty :=
not_disjoint_iff.trans <| by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.not_disjoint⟩ := not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter
theorem disjoint_or_nonempty_inter (s t : Finset α) : Disjoint s t ∨ (s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
exact em _
omit [DecidableEq α] in
theorem disjoint_of_subset_iff_left_eq_empty (h : s ⊆ t) :
Disjoint s t ↔ s = ∅ :=
disjoint_of_le_iff_left_eq_bot h
lemma pairwiseDisjoint_iff {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} {f : ι → Finset α} :
s.PairwiseDisjoint f ↔ ∀ ⦃i⦄, i ∈ s → ∀ ⦃j⦄, j ∈ s → (f i ∩ f j).Nonempty → i = j := by
simp [Set.PairwiseDisjoint, Set.Pairwise, Function.onFun, not_imp_comm (a := _ = _),
not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
end Lattice
instance isDirected_le : IsDirected (Finset α) (· ≤ ·) := by classical infer_instance
instance isDirected_subset : IsDirected (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) := isDirected_le
/-! ### erase -/
section Erase
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem erase_empty (a : α) : erase ∅ a = ∅ :=
rfl
protected lemma Nontrivial.erase_nonempty (hs : s.Nontrivial) : (s.erase a).Nonempty :=
(hs.exists_ne a).imp <| by aesop
@[simp] lemma erase_nonempty (ha : a ∈ s) : (s.erase a).Nonempty ↔ s.Nontrivial := by
simp only [Finset.Nonempty, mem_erase, and_comm (b := _ ∈ _)]
refine ⟨?_, fun hs ↦ hs.exists_ne a⟩
rintro ⟨b, hb, hba⟩
exact ⟨_, hb, _, ha, hba⟩
@[simp]
theorem erase_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Finset α).erase a = ∅ := by
ext x
simp
@[simp]
theorem erase_insert_eq_erase (s : Finset α) (a : α) : (insert a s).erase a = s.erase a :=
ext fun x => by
simp +contextual only [mem_erase, mem_insert, and_congr_right_iff,
false_or, iff_self, imp_true_iff]
theorem erase_insert {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∉ s) : erase (insert a s) a = s := by
rw [erase_insert_eq_erase, erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
theorem erase_insert_of_ne {a b : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ≠ b) :
erase (insert a s) b = insert a (erase s b) :=
ext fun x => by
have : x ≠ b ∧ x = a ↔ x = a := and_iff_right_of_imp fun hx => hx.symm ▸ h
simp only [mem_erase, mem_insert, and_or_left, this]
theorem erase_cons_of_ne {a b : α} {s : Finset α} (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : a ≠ b) :
erase (cons a s ha) b = cons a (erase s b) fun h => ha <| erase_subset _ _ h := by
simp only [cons_eq_insert, erase_insert_of_ne hb]
@[simp] theorem insert_erase (h : a ∈ s) : insert a (erase s a) = s :=
ext fun x => by
simp only [mem_insert, mem_erase, or_and_left, dec_em, true_and]
apply or_iff_right_of_imp
rintro rfl
exact h
lemma erase_eq_iff_eq_insert (hs : a ∈ s) (ht : a ∉ t) : erase s a = t ↔ s = insert a t := by
aesop
lemma insert_erase_invOn :
Set.InvOn (insert a) (fun s ↦ erase s a) {s : Finset α | a ∈ s} {s : Finset α | a ∉ s} :=
⟨fun _s ↦ insert_erase, fun _s ↦ erase_insert⟩
theorem erase_ssubset {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∈ s) : s.erase a ⊂ s :=
calc
s.erase a ⊂ insert a (s.erase a) := ssubset_insert <| not_mem_erase _ _
_ = _ := insert_erase h
theorem ssubset_iff_exists_subset_erase {s t : Finset α} : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ t, s ⊆ t.erase a := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨a, ha, h⟩ => ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset h <| erase_ssubset ha⟩
obtain ⟨a, ht, hs⟩ := not_subset.1 h.2
exact ⟨a, ht, subset_erase.2 ⟨h.1, hs⟩⟩
theorem erase_ssubset_insert (s : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a ⊂ insert a s :=
ssubset_iff_exists_subset_erase.2
⟨a, mem_insert_self _ _, erase_subset_erase _ <| subset_insert _ _⟩
theorem erase_cons {s : Finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) : (s.cons a h).erase a = s := by
rw [cons_eq_insert, erase_insert_eq_erase, erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
theorem subset_insert_iff {a : α} {s t : Finset α} : s ⊆ insert a t ↔ erase s a ⊆ t := by
simp only [subset_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left, mem_erase, mem_insert, and_imp]
exact forall_congr' fun x => forall_swap
theorem erase_insert_subset (a : α) (s : Finset α) : erase (insert a s) a ⊆ s :=
subset_insert_iff.1 <| Subset.rfl
theorem insert_erase_subset (a : α) (s : Finset α) : s ⊆ insert a (erase s a) :=
subset_insert_iff.2 <| Subset.rfl
theorem subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊆ insert a t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
rw [subset_insert_iff, erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
theorem erase_subset_iff_of_mem (h : a ∈ t) : s.erase a ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
rw [← subset_insert_iff, insert_eq_of_mem h]
theorem erase_injOn' (a : α) : { s : Finset α | a ∈ s }.InjOn fun s => erase s a :=
fun s hs t ht (h : s.erase a = _) => by rw [← insert_erase hs, ← insert_erase ht, h]
end Erase
lemma Nontrivial.exists_cons_eq {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nontrivial) :
∃ t a ha b hb hab, (cons b t hb).cons a (mem_cons.not.2 <| not_or_intro hab ha) = s := by
classical
obtain ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab⟩ := hs
have : b ∈ s.erase a := mem_erase.2 ⟨hab.symm, hb⟩
refine ⟨(s.erase a).erase b, a, ?_, b, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
simp [insert_erase this, insert_erase ha, *]
/-! ### sdiff -/
section Sdiff
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
lemma erase_sdiff_erase (hab : a ≠ b) (hb : b ∈ s) : s.erase a \ s.erase b = {b} := by
ext; aesop
-- TODO: Do we want to delete this lemma and `Finset.disjUnion_singleton`,
-- or instead add `Finset.union_singleton`/`Finset.singleton_union`?
theorem sdiff_singleton_eq_erase (a : α) (s : Finset α) : s \ {a} = erase s a := by
ext
rw [mem_erase, mem_sdiff, mem_singleton, and_comm]
-- This lemma matches `Finset.insert_eq` in functionality.
theorem erase_eq (s : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a = s \ {a} :=
(sdiff_singleton_eq_erase _ _).symm
theorem disjoint_erase_comm : Disjoint (s.erase a) t ↔ Disjoint s (t.erase a) := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, disjoint_sdiff_comm]
lemma disjoint_insert_erase (ha : a ∉ t) : Disjoint (s.erase a) (insert a t) ↔ Disjoint s t := by
rw [disjoint_erase_comm, erase_insert ha]
lemma disjoint_erase_insert (ha : a ∉ s) : Disjoint (insert a s) (t.erase a) ↔ Disjoint s t := by
rw [← disjoint_erase_comm, erase_insert ha]
theorem disjoint_of_erase_left (ha : a ∉ t) (hst : Disjoint (s.erase a) t) : Disjoint s t := by
rw [← erase_insert ha, ← disjoint_erase_comm, disjoint_insert_right]
exact ⟨not_mem_erase _ _, hst⟩
theorem disjoint_of_erase_right (ha : a ∉ s) (hst : Disjoint s (t.erase a)) : Disjoint s t := by
rw [← erase_insert ha, disjoint_erase_comm, disjoint_insert_left]
exact ⟨not_mem_erase _ _, hst⟩
theorem inter_erase (a : α) (s t : Finset α) : s ∩ t.erase a = (s ∩ t).erase a := by
simp only [erase_eq, inter_sdiff_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem erase_inter (a : α) (s t : Finset α) : s.erase a ∩ t = (s ∩ t).erase a := by
simpa only [inter_comm t] using inter_erase a t s
theorem erase_sdiff_comm (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a \ t = (s \ t).erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, sdiff_right_comm]
theorem erase_inter_comm (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a ∩ t = s ∩ t.erase a := by
rw [erase_inter, inter_erase]
theorem erase_union_distrib (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : (s ∪ t).erase a = s.erase a ∪ t.erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, union_sdiff_distrib]
theorem insert_inter_distrib (s t : Finset α) (a : α) :
insert a (s ∩ t) = insert a s ∩ insert a t := by simp_rw [insert_eq, union_inter_distrib_left]
theorem erase_sdiff_distrib (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : (s \ t).erase a = s.erase a \ t.erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, sdiff_sdiff, sup_sdiff_eq_sup le_rfl, sup_comm]
theorem erase_union_of_mem (ha : a ∈ t) (s : Finset α) : s.erase a ∪ t = s ∪ t := by
rw [← insert_erase (mem_union_right s ha), erase_union_distrib, ← union_insert, insert_erase ha]
theorem union_erase_of_mem (ha : a ∈ s) (t : Finset α) : s ∪ t.erase a = s ∪ t := by
rw [← insert_erase (mem_union_left t ha), erase_union_distrib, ← insert_union, insert_erase ha]
theorem sdiff_union_erase_cancel (hts : t ⊆ s) (ha : a ∈ t) : s \ t ∪ t.erase a = s.erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, sdiff_union_sdiff_cancel hts (singleton_subset_iff.2 ha)]
theorem sdiff_insert (s t : Finset α) (x : α) : s \ insert x t = (s \ t).erase x := by
simp_rw [← sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, insert_eq, sdiff_sdiff_left', sdiff_union_distrib,
inter_comm]
theorem sdiff_insert_insert_of_mem_of_not_mem {s t : Finset α} {x : α} (hxs : x ∈ s) (hxt : x ∉ t) :
insert x (s \ insert x t) = s \ t := by
rw [sdiff_insert, insert_erase (mem_sdiff.mpr ⟨hxs, hxt⟩)]
theorem sdiff_erase (h : a ∈ s) : s \ t.erase a = insert a (s \ t) := by
rw [← sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, sdiff_sdiff_eq_sdiff_union (singleton_subset_iff.2 h), insert_eq,
union_comm]
theorem sdiff_erase_self (ha : a ∈ s) : s \ s.erase a = {a} := by
rw [sdiff_erase ha, Finset.sdiff_self, insert_empty_eq]
theorem erase_eq_empty_iff (s : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ s = {a} := by
rw [← sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, sdiff_eq_empty_iff_subset, subset_singleton_iff]
--TODO@Yaël: Kill lemmas duplicate with `BooleanAlgebra`
theorem sdiff_disjoint : Disjoint (t \ s) s :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _a ha => (mem_sdiff.1 ha).2
theorem disjoint_sdiff : Disjoint s (t \ s) :=
sdiff_disjoint.symm
theorem disjoint_sdiff_inter (s t : Finset α) : Disjoint (s \ t) (s ∩ t) :=
disjoint_of_subset_right inter_subset_right sdiff_disjoint
end Sdiff
/-! ### attach -/
@[simp]
theorem attach_empty : attach (∅ : Finset α) = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem attach_nonempty_iff {s : Finset α} : s.attach.Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty := by
simp [Finset.Nonempty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected alias ⟨_, Nonempty.attach⟩ := attach_nonempty_iff
@[simp]
theorem attach_eq_empty_iff {s : Finset α} : s.attach = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
/-! ### filter -/
section Filter
variable (p q : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] {s t : Finset α}
theorem filter_singleton (a : α) : filter p {a} = if p a then {a} else ∅ := by
classical
ext x
simp only [mem_singleton, forall_eq, mem_filter]
split_ifs with h <;> by_cases h' : x = a <;> simp [h, h']
theorem filter_cons_of_pos (a : α) (s : Finset α) (ha : a ∉ s) (hp : p a) :
filter p (cons a s ha) = cons a (filter p s) ((mem_of_mem_filter _).mt ha) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.filter_cons_of_pos s.val hp
theorem filter_cons_of_neg (a : α) (s : Finset α) (ha : a ∉ s) (hp : ¬p a) :
filter p (cons a s ha) = filter p s :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.filter_cons_of_neg s.val hp
theorem disjoint_filter {s : Finset α} {p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] :
Disjoint (s.filter p) (s.filter q) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, p x → ¬q x := by
constructor <;> simp +contextual [disjoint_left]
theorem disjoint_filter_filter' (s t : Finset α)
{p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] (h : Disjoint p q) :
Disjoint (s.filter p) (t.filter q) := by
simp_rw [disjoint_left, mem_filter]
rintro a ⟨_, hp⟩ ⟨_, hq⟩
rw [Pi.disjoint_iff] at h
simpa [hp, hq] using h a
theorem disjoint_filter_filter_neg (s t : Finset α) (p : α → Prop)
[DecidablePred p] [∀ x, Decidable (¬p x)] :
Disjoint (s.filter p) (t.filter fun a => ¬p a) :=
disjoint_filter_filter' s t disjoint_compl_right
theorem filter_disj_union (s : Finset α) (t : Finset α) (h : Disjoint s t) :
filter p (disjUnion s t h) = (filter p s).disjUnion (filter p t) (disjoint_filter_filter h) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.filter_add _ _ _
theorem filter_cons {a : α} (s : Finset α) (ha : a ∉ s) :
filter p (cons a s ha) =
if p a then cons a (filter p s) ((mem_of_mem_filter _).mt ha) else filter p s := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos _ _ _ ha h]
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg _ _ _ ha h]
section
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem filter_union (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : (s₁ ∪ s₂).filter p = s₁.filter p ∪ s₂.filter p :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_filter, mem_union, or_and_right]
theorem filter_union_right (s : Finset α) : s.filter p ∪ s.filter q = s.filter fun x => p x ∨ q x :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_filter, mem_union, ← and_or_left]
theorem filter_mem_eq_inter {s t : Finset α} [∀ i, Decidable (i ∈ t)] :
(s.filter fun i => i ∈ t) = s ∩ t :=
ext fun i => by simp [mem_filter, mem_inter]
theorem filter_inter_distrib (s t : Finset α) : (s ∩ t).filter p = s.filter p ∩ t.filter p := by
ext
simp [mem_filter, mem_inter, and_assoc]
theorem filter_inter (s t : Finset α) : filter p s ∩ t = filter p (s ∩ t) := by
ext
simp only [mem_inter, mem_filter, and_right_comm]
theorem inter_filter (s t : Finset α) : s ∩ filter p t = filter p (s ∩ t) := by
rw [inter_comm, filter_inter, inter_comm]
theorem filter_insert (a : α) (s : Finset α) :
filter p (insert a s) = if p a then insert a (filter p s) else filter p s := by
ext x
split_ifs with h <;> by_cases h' : x = a <;> simp [h, h']
theorem filter_erase (a : α) (s : Finset α) : filter p (erase s a) = erase (filter p s) a := by
ext x
simp only [and_assoc, mem_filter, iff_self, mem_erase]
theorem filter_or (s : Finset α) : (s.filter fun a => p a ∨ q a) = s.filter p ∪ s.filter q :=
ext fun _ => by simp [mem_filter, mem_union, and_or_left]
theorem filter_and (s : Finset α) : (s.filter fun a => p a ∧ q a) = s.filter p ∩ s.filter q :=
ext fun _ => by simp [mem_filter, mem_inter, and_comm, and_left_comm, and_self_iff, and_assoc]
theorem filter_not (s : Finset α) : (s.filter fun a => ¬p a) = s \ s.filter p :=
ext fun a => by
simp only [Bool.decide_coe, Bool.not_eq_true', mem_filter, and_comm, mem_sdiff, not_and_or,
Bool.not_eq_true, and_or_left, and_not_self, or_false]
lemma filter_and_not (s : Finset α) (p q : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] :
s.filter (fun a ↦ p a ∧ ¬ q a) = s.filter p \ s.filter q := by
rw [filter_and, filter_not, ← inter_sdiff_assoc, inter_eq_left.2 (filter_subset _ _)]
theorem sdiff_eq_filter (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : s₁ \ s₂ = filter (· ∉ s₂) s₁ :=
ext fun _ => by simp [mem_sdiff, mem_filter]
theorem subset_union_elim {s : Finset α} {t₁ t₂ : Set α} (h : ↑s ⊆ t₁ ∪ t₂) :
∃ s₁ s₂ : Finset α, s₁ ∪ s₂ = s ∧ ↑s₁ ⊆ t₁ ∧ ↑s₂ ⊆ t₂ \ t₁ := by
classical
refine ⟨s.filter (· ∈ t₁), s.filter (· ∉ t₁), ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp [filter_union_right, em]
· intro x
simp
· intro x
simp only [not_not, coe_filter, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_diff, and_imp]
intro hx hx₂
exact ⟨Or.resolve_left (h hx) hx₂, hx₂⟩
-- This is not a good simp lemma, as it would prevent `Finset.mem_filter` from firing
-- on, e.g. `x ∈ s.filter (Eq b)`.
/-- After filtering out everything that does not equal a given value, at most that value remains.
This is equivalent to `filter_eq'` with the equality the other way.
-/
theorem filter_eq [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset β) (b : β) :
s.filter (Eq b) = ite (b ∈ s) {b} ∅ := by
split_ifs with h
· ext
simp only [mem_filter, mem_singleton, decide_eq_true_eq]
refine ⟨fun h => h.2.symm, ?_⟩
rintro rfl
exact ⟨h, rfl⟩
· ext
simp only [mem_filter, not_and, iff_false, not_mem_empty, decide_eq_true_eq]
rintro m rfl
exact h m
/-- After filtering out everything that does not equal a given value, at most that value remains.
This is equivalent to `filter_eq` with the equality the other way.
-/
theorem filter_eq' [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset β) (b : β) :
(s.filter fun a => a = b) = ite (b ∈ s) {b} ∅ :=
_root_.trans (filter_congr fun _ _ => by simp_rw [@eq_comm _ b]) (filter_eq s b)
theorem filter_ne [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset β) (b : β) :
(s.filter fun a => b ≠ a) = s.erase b := by
ext
simp only [mem_filter, mem_erase, Ne, decide_not, Bool.not_eq_true', decide_eq_false_iff_not]
tauto
theorem filter_ne' [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset β) (b : β) : (s.filter fun a => a ≠ b) = s.erase b :=
_root_.trans (filter_congr fun _ _ => by simp_rw [@ne_comm _ b]) (filter_ne s b)
theorem filter_union_filter_of_codisjoint (s : Finset α) (h : Codisjoint p q) :
s.filter p ∪ s.filter q = s :=
(filter_or _ _ _).symm.trans <| filter_true_of_mem fun x _ => h.top_le x trivial
theorem filter_union_filter_neg_eq [∀ x, Decidable (¬p x)] (s : Finset α) :
(s.filter p ∪ s.filter fun a => ¬p a) = s :=
filter_union_filter_of_codisjoint _ _ _ <| @codisjoint_hnot_right _ _ p
end
end Filter
/-! ### range -/
section Range
open Nat
variable {n m l : ℕ}
@[simp]
theorem range_filter_eq {n m : ℕ} : (range n).filter (· = m) = if m < n then {m} else ∅ := by
convert filter_eq (range n) m using 2
· ext
rw [eq_comm]
· simp
end Range
end Finset
/-! ### dedup on list and multiset -/
namespace Multiset
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t : Multiset α}
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_add (s t : Multiset α) : toFinset (s + t) = toFinset s ∪ toFinset t :=
Finset.ext <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_inter (s t : Multiset α) : toFinset (s ∩ t) = toFinset s ∩ toFinset t :=
Finset.ext <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_union (s t : Multiset α) : (s ∪ t).toFinset = s.toFinset ∪ t.toFinset := by
ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_eq_empty {m : Multiset α} : m.toFinset = ∅ ↔ m = 0 :=
Finset.val_inj.symm.trans Multiset.dedup_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_nonempty : s.toFinset.Nonempty ↔ s ≠ 0 := by
simp only [toFinset_eq_empty, Ne, Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected alias ⟨_, Aesop.toFinset_nonempty_of_ne⟩ := toFinset_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_filter (s : Multiset α) (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
Multiset.toFinset (s.filter p) = s.toFinset.filter p := by
ext; simp
end Multiset
namespace List
variable [DecidableEq α] {l l' : List α} {a : α} {f : α → β}
{s : Finset α} {t : Set β} {t' : Finset β}
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_union (l l' : List α) : (l ∪ l').toFinset = l.toFinset ∪ l'.toFinset := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_inter (l l' : List α) : (l ∩ l').toFinset = l.toFinset ∩ l'.toFinset := by
ext
simp
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.toFinset_nonempty_of_ne⟩ := toFinset_nonempty_iff
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_filter (s : List α) (p : α → Bool) :
(s.filter p).toFinset = s.toFinset.filter (p ·) := by
ext; simp [List.mem_filter]
end List
namespace Finset
section ToList
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_nil {s : Finset α} : s.toList = [] ↔ s = ∅ :=
Multiset.toList_eq_nil.trans val_eq_zero
theorem empty_toList {s : Finset α} : s.toList.isEmpty ↔ s = ∅ := by simp
@[simp]
theorem toList_empty : (∅ : Finset α).toList = [] :=
toList_eq_nil.mpr rfl
theorem Nonempty.toList_ne_nil {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nonempty) : s.toList ≠ [] :=
mt toList_eq_nil.mp hs.ne_empty
theorem Nonempty.not_empty_toList {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nonempty) : ¬s.toList.isEmpty :=
mt empty_toList.mp hs.ne_empty
end ToList
/-! ### choose -/
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : Finset α)
/-- Given a finset `l` and a predicate `p`, associate to a proof that there is a unique element of
`l` satisfying `p` this unique element, as an element of the corresponding subtype. -/
def chooseX (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : { a // a ∈ l ∧ p a } :=
Multiset.chooseX p l.val hp
/-- Given a finset `l` and a predicate `p`, associate to a proof that there is a unique element of
`l` satisfying `p` this unique element, as an element of the ambient type. -/
def choose (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : α :=
chooseX p l hp
theorem choose_spec (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(chooseX p l hp).property
theorem choose_mem (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).1
theorem choose_property (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).2
end Choose
end Finset
namespace Equiv
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t : Finset α}
open Finset
/-- The disjoint union of finsets is a sum -/
def Finset.union (s t : Finset α) (h : Disjoint s t) :
s ⊕ t ≃ (s ∪ t : Finset α) :=
Equiv.setCongr (coe_union _ _) |>.trans (Equiv.Set.union (disjoint_coe.mpr h)) |>.symm
@[simp]
theorem Finset.union_symm_inl (h : Disjoint s t) (x : s) :
Equiv.Finset.union s t h (Sum.inl x) = ⟨x, Finset.mem_union.mpr <| Or.inl x.2⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Finset.union_symm_inr (h : Disjoint s t) (y : t) :
Equiv.Finset.union s t h (Sum.inr y) = ⟨y, Finset.mem_union.mpr <| Or.inr y.2⟩ :=
rfl
/-- The type of dependent functions on the disjoint union of finsets `s ∪ t` is equivalent to the
type of pairs of functions on `s` and on `t`. This is similar to `Equiv.sumPiEquivProdPi`. -/
def piFinsetUnion {ι} [DecidableEq ι] (α : ι → Type*) {s t : Finset ι} (h : Disjoint s t) :
((∀ i : s, α i) × ∀ i : t, α i) ≃ ∀ i : (s ∪ t : Finset ι), α i :=
let e := Equiv.Finset.union s t h
sumPiEquivProdPi (fun b ↦ α (e b)) |>.symm.trans (.piCongrLeft (fun i : ↥(s ∪ t) ↦ α i) e)
/-- A finset is equivalent to its coercion as a set. -/
def _root_.Finset.equivToSet (s : Finset α) : s ≃ s.toSet where
toFun a := ⟨a.1, mem_coe.2 a.2⟩
invFun a := ⟨a.1, mem_coe.1 a.2⟩
left_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl
right_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl
end Equiv
namespace Multiset
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
lemma toFinset_replicate (n : ℕ) (a : α) :
(replicate n a).toFinset = if n = 0 then ∅ else {a} := by
ext x
simp only [mem_toFinset, Finset.mem_singleton, mem_replicate]
split_ifs with hn <;> simp [hn]
end Multiset
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Basic.lean | 2,884 | 2,886 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yaël Dillies, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Order.PartialSups
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Fin
/-!
# Making a sequence disjoint
This file defines the way to make a sequence of sets - or, more generally, a map from a partially
ordered type `ι` into a (generalized) Boolean algebra `α` - into a *pairwise disjoint* sequence with
the same partial sups.
For a sequence `f : ℕ → α`, this new sequence will be `f 0`, `f 1 \ f 0`, `f 2 \ (f 0 ⊔ f 1) ⋯`.
It is actually unique, as `disjointed_unique` shows.
## Main declarations
* `disjointed f`: The map sending `i` to `f i \ (⨆ j < i, f j)`. We require the index type to be a
`LocallyFiniteOrderBot` to ensure that the supremum is well defined.
* `partialSups_disjointed`: `disjointed f` has the same partial sups as `f`.
* `disjoint_disjointed`: The elements of `disjointed f` are pairwise disjoint.
* `disjointed_unique`: `disjointed f` is the only pairwise disjoint sequence having the same partial
sups as `f`.
* `Fintype.sup_disjointed` (for finite `ι`) or `iSup_disjointed` (for complete `α`):
`disjointed f` has the same supremum as `f`. Limiting case of `partialSups_disjointed`.
* `Fintype.exists_disjointed_le`: for any finite family `f : ι → α`, there exists a pairwise
disjoint family `g : ι → α` which is bounded above by `f` and has the same supremum. This is
an analogue of `disjointed` for arbitrary finite index types (but without any uniqueness).
We also provide set notation variants of some lemmas.
-/
assert_not_exists SuccAddOrder
open Finset Order
variable {α ι : Type*}
open scoped Function -- required for scoped `on` notation
section GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α]
section Preorder -- the *index type* is a preorder
variable [Preorder ι] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot ι]
/-- The function mapping `i` to `f i \ (⨆ j < i, f j)`. When `ι` is a partial order, this is the
unique function `g` having the same `partialSups` as `f` and such that `g i` and `g j` are
disjoint whenever `i < j`. -/
def disjointed (f : ι → α) (i : ι) : α := f i \ (Iio i).sup f
lemma disjointed_apply (f : ι → α) (i : ι) : disjointed f i = f i \ (Iio i).sup f := rfl
lemma disjointed_of_isMin (f : ι → α) {i : ι} (hn : IsMin i) :
disjointed f i = f i := by
have : Iio i = ∅ := by rwa [← Finset.coe_eq_empty, coe_Iio, Set.Iio_eq_empty_iff]
simp only [disjointed_apply, this, sup_empty, sdiff_bot]
@[simp] lemma disjointed_bot [OrderBot ι] (f : ι → α) : disjointed f ⊥ = f ⊥ :=
disjointed_of_isMin _ isMin_bot
theorem disjointed_le_id : disjointed ≤ (id : (ι → α) → ι → α) :=
fun _ _ ↦ sdiff_le
theorem disjointed_le (f : ι → α) : disjointed f ≤ f :=
disjointed_le_id f
theorem disjoint_disjointed_of_lt (f : ι → α) {i j : ι} (h : i < j) :
Disjoint (disjointed f i) (disjointed f j) :=
(disjoint_sdiff_self_right.mono_left <| le_sup (mem_Iio.mpr h)).mono_left (disjointed_le f i)
lemma disjointed_eq_self {f : ι → α} {i : ι} (hf : ∀ j < i, Disjoint (f j) (f i)) :
disjointed f i = f i := by
rw [disjointed_apply, sdiff_eq_left, disjoint_iff, sup_inf_distrib_left,
sup_congr rfl <| fun j hj ↦ disjoint_iff.mp <| (hf _ (mem_Iio.mp hj)).symm]
exact sup_bot _
/- NB: The original statement for `ι = ℕ` was a `def` and worked for `p : α → Sort*`. I couldn't
prove the `Sort*` version for general `ι`, but all instances of `disjointedRec` in the library are
for Prop anyway. -/
/--
An induction principle for `disjointed`. To prove something about `disjointed f i`, it's
enough to prove it for `f i` and being able to extend through diffs.
-/
lemma disjointedRec {f : ι → α} {p : α → Prop} (hdiff : ∀ ⦃t i⦄, p t → p (t \ f i)) :
∀ ⦃i⦄, p (f i) → p (disjointed f i) := by
classical
intro i hpi
rw [disjointed]
suffices ∀ (s : Finset ι), p (f i \ s.sup f) from this _
intro s
induction s using Finset.induction with
| empty => simpa only [sup_empty, sdiff_bot] using hpi
| insert _ _ ht IH =>
rw [sup_insert, sup_comm, ← sdiff_sdiff]
exact hdiff IH
end Preorder
section PartialOrder -- the index type is a partial order
variable [PartialOrder ι] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot ι]
@[simp]
theorem partialSups_disjointed (f : ι → α) :
partialSups (disjointed f) = partialSups f := by
-- This seems to be much more awkward than the case of linear orders, because the supremum
-- in the definition of `disjointed` can involve multiple "paths" through the poset.
| classical
-- We argue by induction on the size of `Iio i`.
suffices ∀ r i (hi : #(Iio i) ≤ r), partialSups (disjointed f) i = partialSups f i from
OrderHom.ext _ _ (funext fun i ↦ this _ i le_rfl)
intro r i hi
| Mathlib/Order/Disjointed.lean | 114 | 118 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Julian Berman. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Julian Berman
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.PGroup
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Quotient.Defs
/-!
# Torsion groups
This file defines torsion groups, i.e. groups where all elements have finite order.
## Main definitions
* `Monoid.IsTorsion` a predicate asserting `G` is torsion, i.e. that all
elements are of finite order.
* `CommGroup.torsion G`, the torsion subgroup of an abelian group `G`
* `CommMonoid.torsion G`, the above stated for commutative monoids
* `Monoid.IsTorsionFree`, asserting no nontrivial elements have finite order in `G`
* `AddMonoid.IsTorsion` and `AddMonoid.IsTorsionFree` the additive versions of the above
## Implementation
All torsion monoids are really groups (which is proven here as `Monoid.IsTorsion.group`), but since
the definition can be stated on monoids it is implemented on `Monoid` to match other declarations in
the group theory library.
## Tags
periodic group, aperiodic group, torsion subgroup, torsion abelian group
## Future work
* generalize to π-torsion(-free) groups for a set of primes π
* free, free solvable and free abelian groups are torsion free
* complete direct and free products of torsion free groups are torsion free
* groups which are residually finite p-groups with respect to 2 distinct primes are torsion free
-/
variable {G H : Type*}
namespace Monoid
variable (G) [Monoid G]
/-- A predicate on a monoid saying that all elements are of finite order. -/
@[to_additive "A predicate on an additive monoid saying that all elements are of finite order."]
def IsTorsion :=
∀ g : G, IsOfFinOrder g
/-- A monoid is not a torsion monoid if it has an element of infinite order. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "An additive monoid is not a torsion monoid if it
has an element of infinite order."]
theorem not_isTorsion_iff : ¬IsTorsion G ↔ ∃ g : G, ¬IsOfFinOrder g := by
rw [IsTorsion, not_forall]
end Monoid
open Monoid
/-- Torsion monoids are really groups. -/
@[to_additive "Torsion additive monoids are really additive groups"]
noncomputable def IsTorsion.group [Monoid G] (tG : IsTorsion G) : Group G :=
{ ‹Monoid G› with
inv := fun g => g ^ (orderOf g - 1)
inv_mul_cancel := fun g => by
rw [← pow_succ, tsub_add_cancel_of_le, pow_orderOf_eq_one]
exact (tG g).orderOf_pos }
section Group
variable [Group G] {N : Subgroup G} [Group H]
/-- Subgroups of torsion groups are torsion groups. -/
@[to_additive "Subgroups of additive torsion groups are additive torsion groups."]
theorem IsTorsion.subgroup (tG : IsTorsion G) (H : Subgroup G) : IsTorsion H := fun h =>
Submonoid.isOfFinOrder_coe.1 <| tG h
/-- The image of a surjective torsion group homomorphism is torsion. -/
@[to_additive AddIsTorsion.of_surjective
"The image of a surjective additive torsion group homomorphism is torsion."]
theorem IsTorsion.of_surjective {f : G →* H} (hf : Function.Surjective f) (tG : IsTorsion G) :
IsTorsion H := fun h => by
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := hf h
rw [← hg]
exact f.isOfFinOrder (tG g)
/-- Torsion groups are closed under extensions. -/
@[to_additive AddIsTorsion.extension_closed "Additive torsion groups are closed under extensions."]
theorem IsTorsion.extension_closed {f : G →* H} (hN : N = f.ker) (tH : IsTorsion H)
(tN : IsTorsion N) : IsTorsion G := fun g => by
obtain ⟨ngn, ngnpos, hngn⟩ := (tH <| f g).exists_pow_eq_one
have hmem := MonoidHom.mem_ker.mpr ((f.map_pow g ngn).trans hngn)
lift g ^ ngn to N using hN.symm ▸ hmem with gn h
obtain ⟨nn, nnpos, hnn⟩ := (tN gn).exists_pow_eq_one
exact isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr <| ⟨ngn * nn, mul_pos ngnpos nnpos, by
rw [pow_mul, ← h, ← Subgroup.coe_pow, hnn, Subgroup.coe_one]⟩
/-- The image of a quotient is torsion iff the group is torsion. -/
@[to_additive AddIsTorsion.quotient_iff
"The image of a quotient is additively torsion iff the group is torsion."]
theorem IsTorsion.quotient_iff {f : G →* H} (hf : Function.Surjective f) (hN : N = f.ker)
(tN : IsTorsion N) : IsTorsion H ↔ IsTorsion G :=
⟨fun tH => IsTorsion.extension_closed hN tH tN, fun tG => IsTorsion.of_surjective hf tG⟩
/-- If a group exponent exists, the group is torsion. -/
@[to_additive ExponentExists.is_add_torsion
"If a group exponent exists, the group is additively torsion."]
theorem ExponentExists.isTorsion (h : ExponentExists G) : IsTorsion G := fun g => by
obtain ⟨n, npos, hn⟩ := h
exact isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr ⟨n, npos, hn g⟩
/-- The group exponent exists for any bounded torsion group. -/
@[to_additive IsAddTorsion.exponentExists
"The group exponent exists for any bounded additive torsion group."]
theorem IsTorsion.exponentExists (tG : IsTorsion G)
(bounded : (Set.range fun g : G => orderOf g).Finite) : ExponentExists G :=
exponent_ne_zero.mp <|
(exponent_ne_zero_iff_range_orderOf_finite fun g => (tG g).orderOf_pos).mpr bounded
/-- Finite groups are torsion groups. -/
@[to_additive is_add_torsion_of_finite "Finite additive groups are additive torsion groups."]
theorem isTorsion_of_finite [Finite G] : IsTorsion G :=
ExponentExists.isTorsion .of_finite
end Group
section Module
-- A (semi/)ring of scalars and a commutative monoid of elements
variable (R M : Type*) [AddCommMonoid M]
namespace AddMonoid
/-- A module whose scalars are additively torsion is additively torsion. -/
theorem IsTorsion.module_of_torsion [Semiring R] [Module R M] (tR : IsTorsion R) : IsTorsion M :=
fun f =>
isOfFinAddOrder_iff_nsmul_eq_zero.mpr <| by
obtain ⟨n, npos, hn⟩ := (tR 1).exists_nsmul_eq_zero
exact ⟨n, npos, by simp only [← Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul R _ f, ← nsmul_one, hn, zero_smul]⟩
/-- A module with a finite ring of scalars is additively torsion. -/
theorem IsTorsion.module_of_finite [Ring R] [Finite R] [Module R M] : IsTorsion M :=
(is_add_torsion_of_finite : IsTorsion R).module_of_torsion _ _
end AddMonoid
end Module
section CommMonoid
variable (G) [CommMonoid G]
namespace CommMonoid
/-- The torsion submonoid of a commutative monoid.
(Note that by `Monoid.IsTorsion.group` torsion monoids are truthfully groups.)
-/
@[to_additive addTorsion "The torsion submonoid of an additive commutative monoid."]
def torsion : Submonoid G where
carrier := { x | IsOfFinOrder x }
one_mem' := IsOfFinOrder.one
mul_mem' hx hy := hx.mul hy
variable {G}
/-- Torsion submonoids are torsion. -/
@[to_additive "Additive torsion submonoids are additively torsion."]
theorem torsion.isTorsion : IsTorsion <| torsion G := fun ⟨x, n, npos, hn⟩ =>
⟨n, npos,
Subtype.ext <| by
dsimp
rw [mul_left_iterate]
change _ * 1 = 1
rw [_root_.mul_one, SubmonoidClass.coe_pow, Subtype.coe_mk,
(isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one _).mp hn]⟩
variable (G) (p : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime]
/-- The `p`-primary component is the submonoid of elements with order prime-power of `p`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps)
"The `p`-primary component is the submonoid of elements with additive
order prime-power of `p`."]
def primaryComponent : Submonoid G where
carrier := { g | ∃ n : ℕ, orderOf g = p ^ n }
one_mem' := ⟨0, by rw [pow_zero, orderOf_one]⟩
mul_mem' hg₁ hg₂ :=
exists_orderOf_eq_prime_pow_iff.mpr <| by
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := exists_orderOf_eq_prime_pow_iff.mp hg₁
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_orderOf_eq_prime_pow_iff.mp hg₂
exact
⟨m + n, by
rw [mul_pow, pow_add, pow_mul, hm, one_pow, Monoid.one_mul, mul_comm, pow_mul, hn,
one_pow]⟩
variable {G} {p}
/-- Elements of the `p`-primary component have order `p^n` for some `n`. -/
@[to_additive primaryComponent.exists_orderOf_eq_prime_nsmul
"Elements of the `p`-primary component have additive order `p^n` for some `n`"]
theorem primaryComponent.exists_orderOf_eq_prime_pow (g : CommMonoid.primaryComponent G p) :
∃ n : ℕ, orderOf g = p ^ n := by
obtain ⟨_, hn⟩ := g.property
rw [orderOf_submonoid g] at hn
exact ⟨_, hn⟩
/-- The `p`- and `q`-primary components are disjoint for `p ≠ q`. -/
@[to_additive "The `p`- and `q`-primary components are disjoint for `p ≠ q`."]
theorem primaryComponent.disjoint {p' : ℕ} [hp' : Fact p'.Prime] (hne : p ≠ p') :
Disjoint (CommMonoid.primaryComponent G p) (CommMonoid.primaryComponent G p') :=
Submonoid.disjoint_def.mpr <| by
rintro g ⟨_ | n, hn⟩ ⟨n', hn'⟩
· rwa [pow_zero, orderOf_eq_one_iff] at hn
· exact
absurd (eq_of_prime_pow_eq hp.out.prime hp'.out.prime n.succ_pos (hn.symm.trans hn')) hne
end CommMonoid
open CommMonoid (torsion)
namespace Monoid.IsTorsion
variable {G}
/-- The torsion submonoid of a torsion monoid is `⊤`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "The additive torsion submonoid of an additive torsion monoid is `⊤`."]
theorem torsion_eq_top (tG : IsTorsion G) : torsion G = ⊤ := by ext; tauto
/-- A torsion monoid is isomorphic to its torsion submonoid. -/
@[to_additive "An additive torsion monoid is isomorphic to its torsion submonoid."]
def torsionMulEquiv (tG : IsTorsion G) : torsion G ≃* G :=
(MulEquiv.submonoidCongr tG.torsion_eq_top).trans Submonoid.topEquiv
@[to_additive]
theorem torsionMulEquiv_apply (tG : IsTorsion G) (a : torsion G) :
tG.torsionMulEquiv a = MulEquiv.submonoidCongr tG.torsion_eq_top a :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem torsionMulEquiv_symm_apply_coe (tG : IsTorsion G) (a : G) :
tG.torsionMulEquiv.symm a = ⟨Submonoid.topEquiv.symm a, tG _⟩ :=
rfl
end Monoid.IsTorsion
/-- Torsion submonoids of a torsion submonoid are isomorphic to the submonoid. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) AddCommMonoid.Torsion.ofTorsion
"Additive torsion submonoids of an additive torsion submonoid are
isomorphic to the submonoid."]
def Torsion.ofTorsion : torsion (torsion G) ≃* torsion G :=
Monoid.IsTorsion.torsionMulEquiv CommMonoid.torsion.isTorsion
end CommMonoid
section CommGroup
variable (G) [CommGroup G]
namespace CommGroup
/-- The torsion subgroup of an abelian group. -/
@[to_additive "The torsion subgroup of an additive abelian group."]
def torsion : Subgroup G :=
{ CommMonoid.torsion G with inv_mem' := fun hx => IsOfFinOrder.inv hx }
/-- The torsion submonoid of an abelian group equals the torsion subgroup as a submonoid. -/
@[to_additive add_torsion_eq_add_torsion_submonoid
"The additive torsion submonoid of an abelian group equals the torsion
subgroup as a submonoid."]
theorem torsion_eq_torsion_submonoid : CommMonoid.torsion G = (torsion G).toSubmonoid :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_torsion (g : G) : g ∈ torsion G ↔ IsOfFinOrder g := Iff.rfl
variable (p : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime]
/-- The `p`-primary component is the subgroup of elements with order prime-power of `p`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps!)
"The `p`-primary component is the subgroup of elements with additive order
prime-power of `p`."]
def primaryComponent : Subgroup G :=
{ CommMonoid.primaryComponent G p with
inv_mem' := fun {g} ⟨n, hn⟩ => ⟨n, (orderOf_inv g).trans hn⟩ }
variable {G} {p}
/-- The `p`-primary component is a `p` group. -/
theorem primaryComponent.isPGroup : IsPGroup p <| primaryComponent G p := fun g =>
(propext exists_orderOf_eq_prime_pow_iff.symm).mpr
(CommMonoid.primaryComponent.exists_orderOf_eq_prime_pow g)
end CommGroup
end CommGroup
namespace Monoid
section Monoid
variable (G) [Monoid G]
/-- A predicate on a monoid saying that only 1 is of finite order.
This definition is mathematically incorrect for monoids which are not groups.
Please use `IsMulTorsionFree` instead. -/
@[to_additive "A predicate on an additive monoid saying that only 0 is of finite order.
This definition is mathematically incorrect for monoids which are not groups.
Please use `IsAddTorsionFree` instead. "]
def IsTorsionFree :=
∀ g : G, g ≠ 1 → ¬IsOfFinOrder g
variable {G}
/-- A nontrivial monoid is not torsion-free if any nontrivial element has finite order. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "An additive monoid is not torsion free if any
nontrivial element has finite order."]
theorem not_isTorsionFree_iff : ¬IsTorsionFree G ↔ ∃ g : G, g ≠ 1 ∧ IsOfFinOrder g := by
simp_rw [IsTorsionFree, Ne, not_forall, Classical.not_not, exists_prop]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma isTorsionFree_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton G] : IsTorsionFree G :=
fun _a ha _ => ha <| Subsingleton.elim _ _
@[to_additive]
lemma isTorsionFree_iff_torsion_eq_bot {G} [CommGroup G] :
IsTorsionFree G ↔ CommGroup.torsion G = ⊥ := by
rw [IsTorsionFree, eq_bot_iff, SetLike.le_def]
simp [not_imp_not, CommGroup.mem_torsion]
end Monoid
section Group
variable [Group G]
/-- A nontrivial torsion group is not torsion-free. -/
@[to_additive "A nontrivial additive torsion group is not torsion-free."]
theorem IsTorsion.not_torsion_free [hN : Nontrivial G] : IsTorsion G → ¬IsTorsionFree G := fun tG =>
not_isTorsionFree_iff.mpr <| by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := (nontrivial_iff_exists_ne (1 : G)).mp hN
exact ⟨x, hx, tG x⟩
/-- A nontrivial torsion-free group is not torsion. -/
@[to_additive "A nontrivial torsion-free additive group is not torsion."]
theorem IsTorsionFree.not_torsion [hN : Nontrivial G] : IsTorsionFree G → ¬IsTorsion G := fun tfG =>
(not_isTorsion_iff _).mpr <| by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := (nontrivial_iff_exists_ne (1 : G)).mp hN
exact ⟨x, (tfG x) hx⟩
/-- Subgroups of torsion-free groups are torsion-free. -/
@[to_additive "Subgroups of additive torsion-free groups are additively torsion-free."]
theorem IsTorsionFree.subgroup (tG : IsTorsionFree G) (H : Subgroup G) : IsTorsionFree H :=
fun h hne ↦ Submonoid.isOfFinOrder_coe.not.1 <| tG h <| by norm_cast
/-- Direct products of torsion free groups are torsion free. -/
@[to_additive AddMonoid.IsTorsionFree.prod
"Direct products of additive torsion free groups are torsion free."]
theorem IsTorsionFree.prod {η : Type*} {Gs : η → Type*} [∀ i, Group (Gs i)]
(tfGs : ∀ i, IsTorsionFree (Gs i)) : IsTorsionFree <| ∀ i, Gs i := fun w hne h =>
hne <|
funext fun i => Classical.not_not.mp <| mt (tfGs i (w i)) <| Classical.not_not.mpr <| h.apply i
end Group
section CommGroup
open Monoid (IsTorsionFree)
open CommGroup (torsion)
variable (G) [CommGroup G]
/-- Quotienting a group by its torsion subgroup yields a torsion free group. -/
@[to_additive
"Quotienting a group by its additive torsion subgroup yields an additive torsion free group."]
theorem IsTorsionFree.quotient_torsion : IsTorsionFree <| G ⧸ torsion G := fun g hne hfin =>
hne <| by
induction' g using QuotientGroup.induction_on with g
obtain ⟨m, mpos, hm⟩ := hfin.exists_pow_eq_one
obtain ⟨n, npos, hn⟩ := ((QuotientGroup.eq_one_iff _).mp hm).exists_pow_eq_one
exact
(QuotientGroup.eq_one_iff g).mpr
(isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr ⟨m * n, mul_pos mpos npos, (pow_mul g m n).symm ▸ hn⟩)
end CommGroup
end Monoid
namespace AddMonoid
lemma isTorsionFree_iff_noZeroSMulDivisors_nat {M : Type*} [AddMonoid M] :
| IsTorsionFree M ↔ NoZeroSMulDivisors ℕ M := by
simp_rw [AddMonoid.IsTorsionFree, isOfFinAddOrder_iff_nsmul_eq_zero, not_exists, not_and,
pos_iff_ne_zero, noZeroSMulDivisors_iff, forall_swap (β := ℕ)]
exact forall₂_congr fun _ _ ↦ by tauto
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Torsion.lean | 393 | 396 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.CauSeq.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Star.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Norm
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Sum
/-!
# Exponential Function
This file contains the definitions of the real and complex exponential function.
## Main definitions
* `Complex.exp`: The complex exponential function, defined via its Taylor series
* `Real.exp`: The real exponential function, defined as the real part of the complex exponential
-/
open CauSeq Finset IsAbsoluteValue
open scoped ComplexConjugate
namespace Complex
theorem isCauSeq_norm_exp (z : ℂ) :
IsCauSeq abs fun n => ∑ m ∈ range n, ‖z ^ m / m.factorial‖ :=
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_nat_gt ‖z‖
have hn0 : (0 : ℝ) < n := lt_of_le_of_lt (norm_nonneg _) hn
IsCauSeq.series_ratio_test n (‖z‖ / n) (div_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (le_of_lt hn0))
(by rwa [div_lt_iff₀ hn0, one_mul]) fun m hm => by
rw [abs_norm, abs_norm, Nat.factorial_succ, pow_succ', mul_comm m.succ, Nat.cast_mul,
← div_div, mul_div_assoc, mul_div_right_comm, Complex.norm_mul, Complex.norm_div,
norm_natCast]
gcongr
exact le_trans hm (Nat.le_succ _)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias isCauSeq_abs_exp := isCauSeq_norm_exp
noncomputable section
theorem isCauSeq_exp (z : ℂ) : IsCauSeq (‖·‖) fun n => ∑ m ∈ range n, z ^ m / m.factorial :=
(isCauSeq_norm_exp z).of_abv
/-- The Cauchy sequence consisting of partial sums of the Taylor series of
the complex exponential function -/
@[pp_nodot]
def exp' (z : ℂ) : CauSeq ℂ (‖·‖) :=
⟨fun n => ∑ m ∈ range n, z ^ m / m.factorial, isCauSeq_exp z⟩
/-- The complex exponential function, defined via its Taylor series -/
@[pp_nodot]
def exp (z : ℂ) : ℂ :=
CauSeq.lim (exp' z)
/-- scoped notation for the complex exponential function -/
scoped notation "cexp" => Complex.exp
end
end Complex
namespace Real
open Complex
noncomputable section
/-- The real exponential function, defined as the real part of the complex exponential -/
@[pp_nodot]
nonrec def exp (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(exp x).re
/-- scoped notation for the real exponential function -/
scoped notation "rexp" => Real.exp
end
end Real
namespace Complex
variable (x y : ℂ)
@[simp]
theorem exp_zero : exp 0 = 1 := by
rw [exp]
refine lim_eq_of_equiv_const fun ε ε0 => ⟨1, fun j hj => ?_⟩
convert (config := .unfoldSameFun) ε0 -- ε0 : ε > 0 but goal is _ < ε
rcases j with - | j
· exact absurd hj (not_le_of_gt zero_lt_one)
· dsimp [exp']
induction' j with j ih
· dsimp [exp']; simp [show Nat.succ 0 = 1 from rfl]
· rw [← ih (by simp [Nat.succ_le_succ])]
simp only [sum_range_succ, pow_succ]
simp
theorem exp_add : exp (x + y) = exp x * exp y := by
have hj : ∀ j : ℕ, (∑ m ∈ range j, (x + y) ^ m / m.factorial) =
∑ i ∈ range j, ∑ k ∈ range (i + 1), x ^ k / k.factorial *
(y ^ (i - k) / (i - k).factorial) := by
intro j
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun m _ => ?_
rw [add_pow, div_eq_mul_inv, sum_mul]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun I hi => ?_
have h₁ : (m.choose I : ℂ) ≠ 0 :=
Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 (pos_iff_ne_zero.1 (Nat.choose_pos (Nat.le_of_lt_succ (mem_range.1 hi))))
have h₂ := Nat.choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (Nat.le_of_lt_succ <| Finset.mem_range.1 hi)
rw [← h₂, Nat.cast_mul, Nat.cast_mul, mul_inv, mul_inv]
simp only [mul_left_comm (m.choose I : ℂ), mul_assoc, mul_left_comm (m.choose I : ℂ)⁻¹,
mul_comm (m.choose I : ℂ)]
rw [inv_mul_cancel₀ h₁]
simp [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]
simp_rw [exp, exp', lim_mul_lim]
apply (lim_eq_lim_of_equiv _).symm
simp only [hj]
exact cauchy_product (isCauSeq_norm_exp x) (isCauSeq_exp y)
/-- the exponential function as a monoid hom from `Multiplicative ℂ` to `ℂ` -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def expMonoidHom : MonoidHom (Multiplicative ℂ) ℂ :=
{ toFun := fun z => exp z.toAdd,
map_one' := by simp,
map_mul' := by simp [exp_add] }
theorem exp_list_sum (l : List ℂ) : exp l.sum = (l.map exp).prod :=
map_list_prod (M := Multiplicative ℂ) expMonoidHom l
theorem exp_multiset_sum (s : Multiset ℂ) : exp s.sum = (s.map exp).prod :=
@MonoidHom.map_multiset_prod (Multiplicative ℂ) ℂ _ _ expMonoidHom s
theorem exp_sum {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℂ) :
exp (∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, exp (f x) :=
map_prod (β := Multiplicative ℂ) expMonoidHom f s
lemma exp_nsmul (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : exp (n • x) = exp x ^ n :=
@MonoidHom.map_pow (Multiplicative ℂ) ℂ _ _ expMonoidHom _ _
theorem exp_nat_mul (x : ℂ) : ∀ n : ℕ, exp (n * x) = exp x ^ n
| 0 => by rw [Nat.cast_zero, zero_mul, exp_zero, pow_zero]
| Nat.succ n => by rw [pow_succ, Nat.cast_add_one, add_mul, exp_add, ← exp_nat_mul _ n, one_mul]
@[simp]
theorem exp_ne_zero : exp x ≠ 0 := fun h =>
zero_ne_one (α := ℂ) <| by rw [← exp_zero, ← add_neg_cancel x, exp_add, h]; simp
theorem exp_neg : exp (-x) = (exp x)⁻¹ := by
rw [← mul_right_inj' (exp_ne_zero x), ← exp_add]; simp [mul_inv_cancel₀ (exp_ne_zero x)]
theorem exp_sub : exp (x - y) = exp x / exp y := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, exp_add, exp_neg, div_eq_mul_inv]
theorem exp_int_mul (z : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : Complex.exp (n * z) = Complex.exp z ^ n := by
cases n
· simp [exp_nat_mul]
· simp [exp_add, add_mul, pow_add, exp_neg, exp_nat_mul]
@[simp]
theorem exp_conj : exp (conj x) = conj (exp x) := by
dsimp [exp]
rw [← lim_conj]
refine congr_arg CauSeq.lim (CauSeq.ext fun _ => ?_)
dsimp [exp', Function.comp_def, cauSeqConj]
rw [map_sum (starRingEnd _)]
refine sum_congr rfl fun n _ => ?_
rw [map_div₀, map_pow, ← ofReal_natCast, conj_ofReal]
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_exp_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : ((exp x).re : ℂ) = exp x :=
conj_eq_iff_re.1 <| by rw [← exp_conj, conj_ofReal]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_exp (x : ℝ) : (Real.exp x : ℂ) = exp x :=
ofReal_exp_ofReal_re _
@[simp]
theorem exp_ofReal_im (x : ℝ) : (exp x).im = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_exp_ofReal_re, ofReal_im]
theorem exp_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : (exp x).re = Real.exp x :=
rfl
end Complex
namespace Real
open Complex
variable (x y : ℝ)
@[simp]
theorem exp_zero : exp 0 = 1 := by simp [Real.exp]
nonrec theorem exp_add : exp (x + y) = exp x * exp y := by simp [exp_add, exp]
/-- the exponential function as a monoid hom from `Multiplicative ℝ` to `ℝ` -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def expMonoidHom : MonoidHom (Multiplicative ℝ) ℝ :=
{ toFun := fun x => exp x.toAdd,
map_one' := by simp,
map_mul' := by simp [exp_add] }
theorem exp_list_sum (l : List ℝ) : exp l.sum = (l.map exp).prod :=
map_list_prod (M := Multiplicative ℝ) expMonoidHom l
theorem exp_multiset_sum (s : Multiset ℝ) : exp s.sum = (s.map exp).prod :=
@MonoidHom.map_multiset_prod (Multiplicative ℝ) ℝ _ _ expMonoidHom s
theorem exp_sum {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ) :
exp (∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, exp (f x) :=
map_prod (β := Multiplicative ℝ) expMonoidHom f s
lemma exp_nsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : exp (n • x) = exp x ^ n :=
@MonoidHom.map_pow (Multiplicative ℝ) ℝ _ _ expMonoidHom _ _
nonrec theorem exp_nat_mul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : exp (n * x) = exp x ^ n :=
ofReal_injective (by simp [exp_nat_mul])
@[simp]
nonrec theorem exp_ne_zero : exp x ≠ 0 := fun h =>
exp_ne_zero x <| by rw [exp, ← ofReal_inj] at h; simp_all
nonrec theorem exp_neg : exp (-x) = (exp x)⁻¹ :=
ofReal_injective <| by simp [exp_neg]
theorem exp_sub : exp (x - y) = exp x / exp y := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, exp_add, exp_neg, div_eq_mul_inv]
open IsAbsoluteValue Nat
theorem sum_le_exp_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (n : ℕ) : ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i / i ! ≤ exp x :=
calc
∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i / i ! ≤ lim (⟨_, isCauSeq_re (exp' x)⟩ : CauSeq ℝ abs) := by
refine le_lim (CauSeq.le_of_exists ⟨n, fun j hj => ?_⟩)
simp only [exp', const_apply, re_sum]
norm_cast
refine sum_le_sum_of_subset_of_nonneg (range_mono hj) fun _ _ _ ↦ ?_
positivity
_ = exp x := by rw [exp, Complex.exp, ← cauSeqRe, lim_re]
lemma pow_div_factorial_le_exp (hx : 0 ≤ x) (n : ℕ) : x ^ n / n ! ≤ exp x :=
calc
x ^ n / n ! ≤ ∑ k ∈ range (n + 1), x ^ k / k ! :=
single_le_sum (f := fun k ↦ x ^ k / k !) (fun k _ ↦ by positivity) (self_mem_range_succ n)
_ ≤ exp x := sum_le_exp_of_nonneg hx _
theorem quadratic_le_exp_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : 1 + x + x ^ 2 / 2 ≤ exp x :=
calc
1 + x + x ^ 2 / 2 = ∑ i ∈ range 3, x ^ i / i ! := by
simp only [sum_range_succ, range_one, sum_singleton, _root_.pow_zero, factorial, cast_one,
ne_eq, one_ne_zero, not_false_eq_true, div_self, pow_one, mul_one, div_one, Nat.mul_one,
cast_succ, add_right_inj]
ring_nf
_ ≤ exp x := sum_le_exp_of_nonneg hx 3
private theorem add_one_lt_exp_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : x + 1 < exp x :=
(by nlinarith : x + 1 < 1 + x + x ^ 2 / 2).trans_le (quadratic_le_exp_of_nonneg hx.le)
private theorem add_one_le_exp_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : x + 1 ≤ exp x := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hx with (rfl | h)
· simp
exact (add_one_lt_exp_of_pos h).le
theorem one_le_exp {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : 1 ≤ exp x := by linarith [add_one_le_exp_of_nonneg hx]
@[bound]
theorem exp_pos (x : ℝ) : 0 < exp x :=
(le_total 0 x).elim (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one ∘ one_le_exp) fun h => by
rw [← neg_neg x, Real.exp_neg]
exact inv_pos.2 (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (one_le_exp (neg_nonneg.2 h)))
@[bound]
lemma exp_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ exp x := x.exp_pos.le
@[simp]
theorem abs_exp (x : ℝ) : |exp x| = exp x :=
abs_of_pos (exp_pos _)
lemma exp_abs_le (x : ℝ) : exp |x| ≤ exp x + exp (-x) := by
cases le_total x 0 <;> simp [abs_of_nonpos, abs_of_nonneg, exp_nonneg, *]
@[mono]
theorem exp_strictMono : StrictMono exp := fun x y h => by
rw [← sub_add_cancel y x, Real.exp_add]
exact (lt_mul_iff_one_lt_left (exp_pos _)).2
(lt_of_lt_of_le (by linarith) (add_one_le_exp_of_nonneg (by linarith)))
@[gcongr]
theorem exp_lt_exp_of_lt {x y : ℝ} (h : x < y) : exp x < exp y := exp_strictMono h
@[mono]
theorem exp_monotone : Monotone exp :=
exp_strictMono.monotone
@[gcongr, bound]
theorem exp_le_exp_of_le {x y : ℝ} (h : x ≤ y) : exp x ≤ exp y := exp_monotone h
@[simp]
theorem exp_lt_exp {x y : ℝ} : exp x < exp y ↔ x < y :=
exp_strictMono.lt_iff_lt
@[simp]
theorem exp_le_exp {x y : ℝ} : exp x ≤ exp y ↔ x ≤ y :=
exp_strictMono.le_iff_le
theorem exp_injective : Function.Injective exp :=
exp_strictMono.injective
@[simp]
theorem exp_eq_exp {x y : ℝ} : exp x = exp y ↔ x = y :=
exp_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem exp_eq_one_iff : exp x = 1 ↔ x = 0 :=
exp_injective.eq_iff' exp_zero
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_exp_iff {x : ℝ} : 1 < exp x ↔ 0 < x := by rw [← exp_zero, exp_lt_exp]
@[bound] private alias ⟨_, Bound.one_lt_exp_of_pos⟩ := one_lt_exp_iff
@[simp]
theorem exp_lt_one_iff {x : ℝ} : exp x < 1 ↔ x < 0 := by rw [← exp_zero, exp_lt_exp]
@[simp]
theorem exp_le_one_iff {x : ℝ} : exp x ≤ 1 ↔ x ≤ 0 :=
exp_zero ▸ exp_le_exp
@[simp]
theorem one_le_exp_iff {x : ℝ} : 1 ≤ exp x ↔ 0 ≤ x :=
exp_zero ▸ exp_le_exp
end Real
namespace Complex
theorem sum_div_factorial_le {α : Type*} [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
(n j : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) :
(∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (1 / m.factorial : α)) ≤ n.succ / (n.factorial * n) :=
calc
(∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (1 / m.factorial : α)) =
∑ m ∈ range (j - n), (1 / ((m + n).factorial : α)) := by
refine sum_nbij' (· - n) (· + n) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;>
simp +contextual [lt_tsub_iff_right, tsub_add_cancel_of_le]
_ ≤ ∑ m ∈ range (j - n), ((n.factorial : α) * (n.succ : α) ^ m)⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [one_div]
gcongr
rw [← Nat.cast_pow, ← Nat.cast_mul, Nat.cast_le, add_comm]
exact Nat.factorial_mul_pow_le_factorial
_ = (n.factorial : α)⁻¹ * ∑ m ∈ range (j - n), (n.succ : α)⁻¹ ^ m := by
simp [mul_inv, ← mul_sum, ← sum_mul, mul_comm, inv_pow]
_ = ((n.succ : α) - n.succ * (n.succ : α)⁻¹ ^ (j - n)) / (n.factorial * n) := by
have h₁ : (n.succ : α) ≠ 1 :=
@Nat.cast_one α _ ▸ mt Nat.cast_inj.1 (mt Nat.succ.inj (pos_iff_ne_zero.1 hn))
have h₂ : (n.succ : α) ≠ 0 := by positivity
have h₃ : (n.factorial * n : α) ≠ 0 := by positivity
have h₄ : (n.succ - 1 : α) = n := by simp
rw [geom_sum_inv h₁ h₂, eq_div_iff_mul_eq h₃, mul_comm _ (n.factorial * n : α),
← mul_assoc (n.factorial⁻¹ : α), ← mul_inv_rev, h₄, ← mul_assoc (n.factorial * n : α),
mul_comm (n : α) n.factorial, mul_inv_cancel₀ h₃, one_mul, mul_comm]
_ ≤ n.succ / (n.factorial * n : α) := by gcongr; apply sub_le_self; positivity
theorem exp_bound {x : ℂ} (hx : ‖x‖ ≤ 1) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
‖exp x - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ ≤
‖x‖ ^ n * ((n.succ : ℝ) * (n.factorial * n : ℝ)⁻¹) := by
rw [← lim_const (abv := norm) (∑ m ∈ range n, _), exp, sub_eq_add_neg,
← lim_neg, lim_add, ← lim_norm]
refine lim_le (CauSeq.le_of_exists ⟨n, fun j hj => ?_⟩)
simp_rw [← sub_eq_add_neg]
show
‖(∑ m ∈ range j, x ^ m / m.factorial) - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ ≤
‖x‖ ^ n * ((n.succ : ℝ) * (n.factorial * n : ℝ)⁻¹)
rw [sum_range_sub_sum_range hj]
calc
‖∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (x ^ m / m.factorial : ℂ)‖
= ‖∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (x ^ n * (x ^ (m - n) / m.factorial) : ℂ)‖ := by
refine congr_arg norm (sum_congr rfl fun m hm => ?_)
rw [mem_filter, mem_range] at hm
rw [← mul_div_assoc, ← pow_add, add_tsub_cancel_of_le hm.2]
_ ≤ ∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, ‖x ^ n * (x ^ (m - n) / m.factorial)‖ :=
IsAbsoluteValue.abv_sum norm ..
_ ≤ ∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, ‖x‖ ^ n * (1 / m.factorial) := by
simp_rw [Complex.norm_mul, Complex.norm_pow, Complex.norm_div, norm_natCast]
gcongr
rw [Complex.norm_pow]
exact pow_le_one₀ (norm_nonneg _) hx
_ = ‖x‖ ^ n * ∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (1 / m.factorial : ℝ) := by
simp [abs_mul, abv_pow abs, abs_div, ← mul_sum]
_ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ n * (n.succ * (n.factorial * n : ℝ)⁻¹) := by
gcongr
exact sum_div_factorial_le _ _ hn
theorem exp_bound' {x : ℂ} {n : ℕ} (hx : ‖x‖ / n.succ ≤ 1 / 2) :
‖exp x - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ n / n.factorial * 2 := by
rw [← lim_const (abv := norm) (∑ m ∈ range n, _),
exp, sub_eq_add_neg, ← lim_neg, lim_add, ← lim_norm]
refine lim_le (CauSeq.le_of_exists ⟨n, fun j hj => ?_⟩)
simp_rw [← sub_eq_add_neg]
show ‖(∑ m ∈ range j, x ^ m / m.factorial) - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ ≤
‖x‖ ^ n / n.factorial * 2
let k := j - n
have hj : j = n + k := (add_tsub_cancel_of_le hj).symm
rw [hj, sum_range_add_sub_sum_range]
calc
‖∑ i ∈ range k, x ^ (n + i) / ((n + i).factorial : ℂ)‖ ≤
∑ i ∈ range k, ‖x ^ (n + i) / ((n + i).factorial : ℂ)‖ :=
IsAbsoluteValue.abv_sum _ _ _
_ ≤ ∑ i ∈ range k, ‖x‖ ^ (n + i) / (n + i).factorial := by
simp [norm_natCast, Complex.norm_pow]
_ ≤ ∑ i ∈ range k, ‖x‖ ^ (n + i) / ((n.factorial : ℝ) * (n.succ : ℝ) ^ i) := ?_
_ = ∑ i ∈ range k, ‖x‖ ^ n / n.factorial * (‖x‖ ^ i / (n.succ : ℝ) ^ i) := ?_
_ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ n / ↑n.factorial * 2 := ?_
· gcongr
exact mod_cast Nat.factorial_mul_pow_le_factorial
· refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ _ => ?_
simp only [pow_add, div_eq_inv_mul, mul_inv, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc]
· rw [← mul_sum]
gcongr
simp_rw [← div_pow]
rw [geom_sum_eq, div_le_iff_of_neg]
· trans (-1 : ℝ)
· linarith
· simp only [neg_le_sub_iff_le_add, div_pow, Nat.cast_succ, le_add_iff_nonneg_left]
positivity
· linarith
· linarith
theorem norm_exp_sub_one_le {x : ℂ} (hx : ‖x‖ ≤ 1) : ‖exp x - 1‖ ≤ 2 * ‖x‖ :=
calc
‖exp x - 1‖ = ‖exp x - ∑ m ∈ range 1, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ := by simp [sum_range_succ]
_ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ 1 * ((Nat.succ 1 : ℝ) * ((Nat.factorial 1) * (1 : ℕ) : ℝ)⁻¹) :=
(exp_bound hx (by decide))
_ = 2 * ‖x‖ := by simp [two_mul, mul_two, mul_add, mul_comm, add_mul, Nat.factorial]
theorem norm_exp_sub_one_sub_id_le {x : ℂ} (hx : ‖x‖ ≤ 1) : ‖exp x - 1 - x‖ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ 2 :=
calc
‖exp x - 1 - x‖ = ‖exp x - ∑ m ∈ range 2, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sum_range_succ_comm, add_assoc, Nat.factorial]
_ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ 2 * ((Nat.succ 2 : ℝ) * (Nat.factorial 2 * (2 : ℕ) : ℝ)⁻¹) :=
(exp_bound hx (by decide))
_ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ 2 * 1 := by gcongr; norm_num [Nat.factorial]
_ = ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by rw [mul_one]
lemma norm_exp_sub_sum_le_exp_norm_sub_sum (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) :
‖exp x - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖
≤ Real.exp ‖x‖ - ∑ m ∈ range n, ‖x‖ ^ m / m.factorial := by
rw [← CauSeq.lim_const (abv := norm) (∑ m ∈ range n, _), Complex.exp, sub_eq_add_neg,
← CauSeq.lim_neg, CauSeq.lim_add, ← lim_norm]
refine CauSeq.lim_le (CauSeq.le_of_exists ⟨n, fun j hj => ?_⟩)
simp_rw [← sub_eq_add_neg]
calc ‖(∑ m ∈ range j, x ^ m / m.factorial) - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖
_ ≤ (∑ m ∈ range j, ‖x‖ ^ m / m.factorial) - ∑ m ∈ range n, ‖x‖ ^ m / m.factorial := by
rw [sum_range_sub_sum_range hj, sum_range_sub_sum_range hj]
refine (IsAbsoluteValue.abv_sum norm ..).trans_eq ?_
congr with i
simp [Complex.norm_pow]
_ ≤ Real.exp ‖x‖ - ∑ m ∈ range n, ‖x‖ ^ m / m.factorial := by
gcongr
exact Real.sum_le_exp_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) _
lemma norm_exp_le_exp_norm (x : ℂ) : ‖exp x‖ ≤ Real.exp ‖x‖ := by
convert norm_exp_sub_sum_le_exp_norm_sub_sum x 0 using 1 <;> simp
lemma norm_exp_sub_sum_le_norm_mul_exp (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) :
‖exp x - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ n * Real.exp ‖x‖ := by
rw [← CauSeq.lim_const (abv := norm) (∑ m ∈ range n, _), Complex.exp, sub_eq_add_neg,
← CauSeq.lim_neg, CauSeq.lim_add, ← lim_norm]
refine CauSeq.lim_le (CauSeq.le_of_exists ⟨n, fun j hj => ?_⟩)
simp_rw [← sub_eq_add_neg]
show ‖(∑ m ∈ range j, x ^ m / m.factorial) - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial‖ ≤ _
rw [sum_range_sub_sum_range hj]
calc
‖∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (x ^ m / m.factorial : ℂ)‖
= ‖∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (x ^ n * (x ^ (m - n) / m.factorial) : ℂ)‖ := by
refine congr_arg norm (sum_congr rfl fun m hm => ?_)
rw [mem_filter, mem_range] at hm
rw [← mul_div_assoc, ← pow_add, add_tsub_cancel_of_le hm.2]
_ ≤ ∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, ‖x ^ n * (x ^ (m - n) / m.factorial)‖ :=
IsAbsoluteValue.abv_sum norm ..
_ ≤ ∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, ‖x‖ ^ n * (‖x‖ ^ (m - n) / (m - n).factorial) := by
simp_rw [Complex.norm_mul, Complex.norm_pow, Complex.norm_div, norm_natCast]
gcongr with i hi
· rw [Complex.norm_pow]
· simp
_ = ‖x‖ ^ n * ∑ m ∈ range j with n ≤ m, (‖x‖ ^ (m - n) / (m - n).factorial) := by
rw [← mul_sum]
_ = ‖x‖ ^ n * ∑ m ∈ range (j - n), (‖x‖ ^ m / m.factorial) := by
congr 1
refine (sum_bij (fun m hm ↦ m + n) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_).symm
· intro a ha
simp only [mem_filter, mem_range, le_add_iff_nonneg_left, zero_le, and_true]
simp only [mem_range] at ha
rwa [← lt_tsub_iff_right]
· intro a ha b hb hab
simpa using hab
· intro b hb
simp only [mem_range, exists_prop]
simp only [mem_filter, mem_range] at hb
refine ⟨b - n, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [tsub_lt_tsub_iff_right hb.2]
exact hb.1
· rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le hb.2]
· simp
_ ≤ ‖x‖ ^ n * Real.exp ‖x‖ := by
gcongr
refine Real.sum_le_exp_of_nonneg ?_ _
exact norm_nonneg _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_exp_sub_one_le := norm_exp_sub_one_le
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_exp_sub_one_sub_id_le := norm_exp_sub_one_sub_id_le
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_exp_sub_sum_le_exp_abs_sub_sum :=
norm_exp_sub_sum_le_exp_norm_sub_sum
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_exp_le_exp_abs := norm_exp_le_exp_norm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_exp_sub_sum_le_abs_mul_exp :=
norm_exp_sub_sum_le_norm_mul_exp
end Complex
namespace Real
open Complex Finset
nonrec theorem exp_bound {x : ℝ} (hx : |x| ≤ 1) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
|exp x - ∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial| ≤ |x| ^ n * (n.succ / (n.factorial * n)) := by
have hxc : ‖(x : ℂ)‖ ≤ 1 := mod_cast hx
convert exp_bound hxc hn using 2 <;>
norm_cast
theorem exp_bound' {x : ℝ} (h1 : 0 ≤ x) (h2 : x ≤ 1) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
Real.exp x ≤ (∑ m ∈ Finset.range n, x ^ m / m.factorial) +
x ^ n * (n + 1) / (n.factorial * n) := by
have h3 : |x| = x := by simpa
have h4 : |x| ≤ 1 := by rwa [h3]
have h' := Real.exp_bound h4 hn
rw [h3] at h'
have h'' := (abs_sub_le_iff.1 h').1
have t := sub_le_iff_le_add'.1 h''
simpa [mul_div_assoc] using t
theorem abs_exp_sub_one_le {x : ℝ} (hx : |x| ≤ 1) : |exp x - 1| ≤ 2 * |x| := by
have : ‖(x : ℂ)‖ ≤ 1 := mod_cast hx
exact_mod_cast Complex.norm_exp_sub_one_le (x := x) this
theorem abs_exp_sub_one_sub_id_le {x : ℝ} (hx : |x| ≤ 1) : |exp x - 1 - x| ≤ x ^ 2 := by
rw [← sq_abs]
have : ‖(x : ℂ)‖ ≤ 1 := mod_cast hx
exact_mod_cast Complex.norm_exp_sub_one_sub_id_le this
/-- A finite initial segment of the exponential series, followed by an arbitrary tail.
For fixed `n` this is just a linear map wrt `r`, and each map is a simple linear function
of the previous (see `expNear_succ`), with `expNear n x r ⟶ exp x` as `n ⟶ ∞`,
for any `r`. -/
noncomputable def expNear (n : ℕ) (x r : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(∑ m ∈ range n, x ^ m / m.factorial) + x ^ n / n.factorial * r
@[simp]
theorem expNear_zero (x r) : expNear 0 x r = r := by simp [expNear]
@[simp]
theorem expNear_succ (n x r) : expNear (n + 1) x r = expNear n x (1 + x / (n + 1) * r) := by
simp [expNear, range_succ, mul_add, add_left_comm, add_assoc, pow_succ, div_eq_mul_inv,
mul_inv, Nat.factorial]
ac_rfl
theorem expNear_sub (n x r₁ r₂) : expNear n x r₁ -
expNear n x r₂ = x ^ n / n.factorial * (r₁ - r₂) := by
simp [expNear, mul_sub]
theorem exp_approx_end (n m : ℕ) (x : ℝ) (e₁ : n + 1 = m) (h : |x| ≤ 1) :
|exp x - expNear m x 0| ≤ |x| ^ m / m.factorial * ((m + 1) / m) := by
simp only [expNear, mul_zero, add_zero]
convert exp_bound (n := m) h ?_ using 1
· field_simp [mul_comm]
· omega
theorem exp_approx_succ {n} {x a₁ b₁ : ℝ} (m : ℕ) (e₁ : n + 1 = m) (a₂ b₂ : ℝ)
(e : |1 + x / m * a₂ - a₁| ≤ b₁ - |x| / m * b₂)
(h : |exp x - expNear m x a₂| ≤ |x| ^ m / m.factorial * b₂) :
|exp x - expNear n x a₁| ≤ |x| ^ n / n.factorial * b₁ := by
refine (abs_sub_le _ _ _).trans ((add_le_add_right h _).trans ?_)
subst e₁; rw [expNear_succ, expNear_sub, abs_mul]
convert mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (a := |x| ^ n / ↑(Nat.factorial n))
(le_sub_iff_add_le'.1 e) ?_ using 1
· simp [mul_add, pow_succ', div_eq_mul_inv, abs_mul, abs_inv, ← pow_abs, mul_inv, Nat.factorial]
ac_rfl
· simp [div_nonneg, abs_nonneg]
theorem exp_approx_end' {n} {x a b : ℝ} (m : ℕ) (e₁ : n + 1 = m) (rm : ℝ) (er : ↑m = rm)
(h : |x| ≤ 1) (e : |1 - a| ≤ b - |x| / rm * ((rm + 1) / rm)) :
|exp x - expNear n x a| ≤ |x| ^ n / n.factorial * b := by
subst er
exact exp_approx_succ _ e₁ _ _ (by simpa using e) (exp_approx_end _ _ _ e₁ h)
theorem exp_1_approx_succ_eq {n} {a₁ b₁ : ℝ} {m : ℕ} (en : n + 1 = m) {rm : ℝ} (er : ↑m = rm)
(h : |exp 1 - expNear m 1 ((a₁ - 1) * rm)| ≤ |1| ^ m / m.factorial * (b₁ * rm)) :
|exp 1 - expNear n 1 a₁| ≤ |1| ^ n / n.factorial * b₁ := by
subst er
refine exp_approx_succ _ en _ _ ?_ h
field_simp [show (m : ℝ) ≠ 0 by norm_cast; omega]
theorem exp_approx_start (x a b : ℝ) (h : |exp x - expNear 0 x a| ≤ |x| ^ 0 / Nat.factorial 0 * b) :
|exp x - a| ≤ b := by simpa using h
theorem exp_bound_div_one_sub_of_interval' {x : ℝ} (h1 : 0 < x) (h2 : x < 1) :
Real.exp x < 1 / (1 - x) := by
have H : 0 < 1 - (1 + x + x ^ 2) * (1 - x) := calc
0 < x ^ 3 := by positivity
_ = 1 - (1 + x + x ^ 2) * (1 - x) := by ring
calc
exp x ≤ _ := exp_bound' h1.le h2.le zero_lt_three
_ ≤ 1 + x + x ^ 2 := by
-- Porting note: was `norm_num [Finset.sum] <;> nlinarith`
-- This proof should be restored after the norm_num plugin for big operators is ported.
-- (It may also need the positivity extensions in https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/3907.)
rw [show 3 = 1 + 1 + 1 from rfl]
repeat rw [Finset.sum_range_succ]
norm_num [Nat.factorial]
nlinarith
_ < 1 / (1 - x) := by rw [lt_div_iff₀] <;> nlinarith
theorem exp_bound_div_one_sub_of_interval {x : ℝ} (h1 : 0 ≤ x) (h2 : x < 1) :
Real.exp x ≤ 1 / (1 - x) := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le h1 with (rfl | h1)
· simp
· exact (exp_bound_div_one_sub_of_interval' h1 h2).le
theorem add_one_lt_exp {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : x + 1 < Real.exp x := by
obtain hx | hx := hx.symm.lt_or_lt
· exact add_one_lt_exp_of_pos hx
obtain h' | h' := le_or_lt 1 (-x)
· linarith [x.exp_pos]
have hx' : 0 < x + 1 := by linarith
simpa [add_comm, exp_neg, inv_lt_inv₀ (exp_pos _) hx']
using exp_bound_div_one_sub_of_interval' (neg_pos.2 hx) h'
theorem add_one_le_exp (x : ℝ) : x + 1 ≤ Real.exp x := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· simp
· exact (add_one_lt_exp hx).le
lemma one_sub_lt_exp_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : 1 - x < exp (-x) :=
(sub_eq_neg_add _ _).trans_lt <| add_one_lt_exp <| neg_ne_zero.2 hx
lemma one_sub_le_exp_neg (x : ℝ) : 1 - x ≤ exp (-x) :=
(sub_eq_neg_add _ _).trans_le <| add_one_le_exp _
theorem one_sub_div_pow_le_exp_neg {n : ℕ} {t : ℝ} (ht' : t ≤ n) : (1 - t / n) ^ n ≤ exp (-t) := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
rwa [Nat.cast_zero] at ht'
calc
(1 - t / n) ^ n ≤ rexp (-(t / n)) ^ n := by
gcongr
· exact sub_nonneg.2 <| div_le_one_of_le₀ ht' n.cast_nonneg
· exact one_sub_le_exp_neg _
_ = rexp (-t) := by rw [← Real.exp_nat_mul, mul_neg, mul_comm, div_mul_cancel₀]; positivity
lemma le_inv_mul_exp (x : ℝ) {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 < c) : x ≤ c⁻¹ * exp (c * x) := by
rw [le_inv_mul_iff₀ hc]
calc c * x
_ ≤ c * x + 1 := le_add_of_nonneg_right zero_le_one
_ ≤ _ := Real.add_one_le_exp (c * x)
end Real
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean.Meta Qq
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: `Real.exp` is always positive. -/
@[positivity Real.exp _]
def evalExp : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _ _ e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(Real.exp $a) =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.positive q(Real.exp_pos $a))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not Real.exp"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
namespace Complex
@[simp]
theorem norm_exp_ofReal (x : ℝ) : ‖exp x‖ = Real.exp x := by
rw [← ofReal_exp]
exact Complex.norm_of_nonneg (le_of_lt (Real.exp_pos _))
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_exp_ofReal := norm_exp_ofReal
end Complex
| Mathlib/Data/Complex/Exponential.lean | 1,092 | 1,092 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Star
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.NonsingularInverse
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Trace
/-!
# Topological properties of matrices
This file is a place to collect topological results about matrices.
## Main definitions:
* `Matrix.topologicalRing`: square matrices form a topological ring
## Main results
* Continuity:
* `Continuous.matrix_det`: the determinant is continuous over a topological ring.
* `Continuous.matrix_adjugate`: the adjugate is continuous over a topological ring.
* Infinite sums
* `Matrix.transpose_tsum`: transpose commutes with infinite sums
* `Matrix.diagonal_tsum`: diagonal commutes with infinite sums
* `Matrix.blockDiagonal_tsum`: block diagonal commutes with infinite sums
* `Matrix.blockDiagonal'_tsum`: non-uniform block diagonal commutes with infinite sums
-/
open Matrix
variable {X α l m n p S R : Type*} {m' n' : l → Type*}
instance [TopologicalSpace R] : TopologicalSpace (Matrix m n R) :=
Pi.topologicalSpace
instance [TopologicalSpace R] [T2Space R] : T2Space (Matrix m n R) :=
Pi.t2Space
/-! ### Lemmas about continuity of operations -/
section Continuity
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace R]
instance [SMul α R] [ContinuousConstSMul α R] : ContinuousConstSMul α (Matrix m n R) :=
inferInstanceAs (ContinuousConstSMul α (m → n → R))
instance [TopologicalSpace α] [SMul α R] [ContinuousSMul α R] : ContinuousSMul α (Matrix m n R) :=
inferInstanceAs (ContinuousSMul α (m → n → R))
instance [Add R] [ContinuousAdd R] : ContinuousAdd (Matrix m n R) :=
Pi.continuousAdd
instance [Neg R] [ContinuousNeg R] : ContinuousNeg (Matrix m n R) :=
Pi.continuousNeg
instance [AddGroup R] [IsTopologicalAddGroup R] : IsTopologicalAddGroup (Matrix m n R) :=
Pi.topologicalAddGroup
/-- To show a function into matrices is continuous it suffices to show the coefficients of the
resulting matrix are continuous -/
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_matrix [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → Matrix m n R}
(h : ∀ i j, Continuous fun a => f a i j) : Continuous f :=
continuous_pi fun _ => continuous_pi fun _ => h _ _
theorem Continuous.matrix_elem {A : X → Matrix m n R} (hA : Continuous A) (i : m) (j : n) :
Continuous fun x => A x i j :=
(continuous_apply_apply i j).comp hA
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.matrix_map [TopologicalSpace S] {A : X → Matrix m n S} {f : S → R}
(hA : Continuous A) (hf : Continuous f) : Continuous fun x => (A x).map f :=
continuous_matrix fun _ _ => hf.comp <| hA.matrix_elem _ _
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.matrix_transpose {A : X → Matrix m n R} (hA : Continuous A) :
Continuous fun x => (A x)ᵀ :=
continuous_matrix fun i j => hA.matrix_elem j i
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.matrix_conjTranspose [Star R] [ContinuousStar R] {A : X → Matrix m n R}
(hA : Continuous A) : Continuous fun x => (A x)ᴴ :=
hA.matrix_transpose.matrix_map continuous_star
instance [Star R] [ContinuousStar R] : ContinuousStar (Matrix m m R) :=
⟨continuous_id.matrix_conjTranspose⟩
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.matrix_replicateCol {ι : Type*} {A : X → n → R} (hA : Continuous A) :
Continuous fun x => replicateCol ι (A x) :=
continuous_matrix fun i _ => (continuous_apply i).comp hA
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-15")] alias Continuous.matrix_col := Continuous.matrix_replicateCol
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.matrix_replicateRow {ι : Type*} {A : X → n → R} (hA : Continuous A) :
Continuous fun x => replicateRow ι (A x) :=
continuous_matrix fun _ _ => (continuous_apply _).comp hA
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-15")] alias Continuous.matrix_row := Continuous.matrix_replicateRow
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.matrix_diagonal [Zero R] [DecidableEq n] {A : X → n → R} (hA : Continuous A) :
Continuous fun x => diagonal (A x) :=
continuous_matrix fun i _ => ((continuous_apply i).comp hA).if_const _ continuous_zero
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.matrix_dotProduct [Fintype n] [Mul R] [AddCommMonoid R] [ContinuousAdd R]
[ContinuousMul R] {A : X → n → R} {B : X → n → R} (hA : Continuous A) (hB : Continuous B) :
Continuous fun x => dotProduct (A x) (B x) :=
continuous_finset_sum _ fun i _ =>
((continuous_apply i).comp hA).mul ((continuous_apply i).comp hB)
/-- For square matrices the usual `continuous_mul` can be used. -/
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.matrix_mul [Fintype n] [Mul R] [AddCommMonoid R] [ContinuousAdd R]
[ContinuousMul R] {A : X → Matrix m n R} {B : X → Matrix n p R} (hA : Continuous A)
(hB : Continuous B) : Continuous fun x => A x * B x :=
continuous_matrix fun _ _ =>
continuous_finset_sum _ fun _ _ => (hA.matrix_elem _ _).mul (hB.matrix_elem _ _)
instance [Fintype n] [Mul R] [AddCommMonoid R] [ContinuousAdd R] [ContinuousMul R] :
ContinuousMul (Matrix n n R) :=
⟨continuous_fst.matrix_mul continuous_snd⟩
instance [Fintype n] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R] [IsTopologicalSemiring R] :
IsTopologicalSemiring (Matrix n n R) where
instance Matrix.topologicalRing [Fintype n] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing R] [IsTopologicalRing R] :
IsTopologicalRing (Matrix n n R) where
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.matrix_vecMulVec [Mul R] [ContinuousMul R] {A : X → m → R} {B : X → n → R}
(hA : Continuous A) (hB : Continuous B) : Continuous fun x => vecMulVec (A x) (B x) :=
continuous_matrix fun _ _ => ((continuous_apply _).comp hA).mul ((continuous_apply _).comp hB)
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.matrix_mulVec [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R] [ContinuousAdd R] [ContinuousMul R]
[Fintype n] {A : X → Matrix m n R} {B : X → n → R} (hA : Continuous A) (hB : Continuous B) :
Continuous fun x => A x *ᵥ B x :=
continuous_pi fun i => ((continuous_apply i).comp hA).matrix_dotProduct hB
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.matrix_vecMul [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R] [ContinuousAdd R] [ContinuousMul R]
[Fintype m] {A : X → m → R} {B : X → Matrix m n R} (hA : Continuous A) (hB : Continuous B) :
Continuous fun x => A x ᵥ* B x :=
continuous_pi fun _i => hA.matrix_dotProduct <| continuous_pi fun _j => hB.matrix_elem _ _
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.matrix_submatrix {A : X → Matrix l n R} (hA : Continuous A) (e₁ : m → l)
(e₂ : p → n) : Continuous fun x => (A x).submatrix e₁ e₂ :=
continuous_matrix fun _i _j => hA.matrix_elem _ _
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.matrix_reindex {A : X → Matrix l n R} (hA : Continuous A) (e₁ : l ≃ m)
(e₂ : n ≃ p) : Continuous fun x => reindex e₁ e₂ (A x) :=
hA.matrix_submatrix _ _
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.matrix_diag {A : X → Matrix n n R} (hA : Continuous A) :
Continuous fun x => Matrix.diag (A x) :=
continuous_pi fun _ => hA.matrix_elem _ _
-- note this doesn't elaborate well from the above
theorem continuous_matrix_diag : Continuous (Matrix.diag : Matrix n n R → n → R) :=
show Continuous fun x : Matrix n n R => Matrix.diag x from continuous_id.matrix_diag
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.matrix_trace [Fintype n] [AddCommMonoid R] [ContinuousAdd R]
{A : X → Matrix n n R} (hA : Continuous A) : Continuous fun x => trace (A x) :=
continuous_finset_sum _ fun _ _ => hA.matrix_elem _ _
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.matrix_det [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] [CommRing R] [IsTopologicalRing R]
{A : X → Matrix n n R} (hA : Continuous A) : Continuous fun x => (A x).det := by
simp_rw [Matrix.det_apply]
refine continuous_finset_sum _ fun l _ => Continuous.const_smul ?_ _
exact continuous_finset_prod _ fun l _ => hA.matrix_elem _ _
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.matrix_updateCol [DecidableEq n] (i : n) {A : X → Matrix m n R}
{B : X → m → R} (hA : Continuous A) (hB : Continuous B) :
Continuous fun x => (A x).updateCol i (B x) :=
continuous_matrix fun _j k =>
(continuous_apply k).comp <|
((continuous_apply _).comp hA).update i ((continuous_apply _).comp hB)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-11")]
alias Continuous.matrix_updateColumn := Continuous.matrix_updateCol
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.matrix_updateRow [DecidableEq m] (i : m) {A : X → Matrix m n R} {B : X → n → R}
(hA : Continuous A) (hB : Continuous B) : Continuous fun x => (A x).updateRow i (B x) :=
hA.update i hB
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.matrix_cramer [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] [CommRing R] [IsTopologicalRing R]
{A : X → Matrix n n R} {B : X → n → R} (hA : Continuous A) (hB : Continuous B) :
Continuous fun x => cramer (A x) (B x) :=
continuous_pi fun _ => (hA.matrix_updateCol _ hB).matrix_det
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.matrix_adjugate [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] [CommRing R] [IsTopologicalRing R]
{A : X → Matrix n n R} (hA : Continuous A) : Continuous fun x => (A x).adjugate :=
continuous_matrix fun _j k =>
(hA.matrix_transpose.matrix_updateCol k continuous_const).matrix_det
/-- When `Ring.inverse` is continuous at the determinant (such as in a `NormedRing`, or a
topological field), so is `Matrix.inv`. -/
theorem continuousAt_matrix_inv [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] [CommRing R] [IsTopologicalRing R]
(A : Matrix n n R) (h : ContinuousAt Ring.inverse A.det) : ContinuousAt Inv.inv A :=
(h.comp continuous_id.matrix_det.continuousAt).smul continuous_id.matrix_adjugate.continuousAt
-- lemmas about functions in `Data/Matrix/Block.lean`
section BlockMatrices
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.matrix_fromBlocks {A : X → Matrix n l R} {B : X → Matrix n m R}
{C : X → Matrix p l R} {D : X → Matrix p m R} (hA : Continuous A) (hB : Continuous B)
(hC : Continuous C) (hD : Continuous D) :
Continuous fun x => Matrix.fromBlocks (A x) (B x) (C x) (D x) :=
continuous_matrix <| by
rintro (i | i) (j | j) <;> refine Continuous.matrix_elem ?_ i j <;> assumption
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.matrix_blockDiagonal [Zero R] [DecidableEq p] {A : X → p → Matrix m n R}
(hA : Continuous A) : Continuous fun x => blockDiagonal (A x) :=
continuous_matrix fun ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ ⟨j₁, _j₂⟩ =>
(((continuous_apply i₂).comp hA).matrix_elem i₁ j₁).if_const _ continuous_zero
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.matrix_blockDiag {A : X → Matrix (m × p) (n × p) R} (hA : Continuous A) :
Continuous fun x => blockDiag (A x) :=
continuous_pi fun _i => continuous_matrix fun _j _k => hA.matrix_elem _ _
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.matrix_blockDiagonal' [Zero R] [DecidableEq l]
{A : X → ∀ i, Matrix (m' i) (n' i) R} (hA : Continuous A) :
Continuous fun x => blockDiagonal' (A x) :=
continuous_matrix fun ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ ⟨j₁, j₂⟩ => by
dsimp only [blockDiagonal'_apply']
split_ifs with h
· subst h
exact ((continuous_apply i₁).comp hA).matrix_elem i₂ j₂
· exact continuous_const
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.matrix_blockDiag'
{A : X → Matrix (Σ i, m' i) (Σ i, n' i) R} (hA : Continuous A) :
Continuous fun x => blockDiag' (A x) :=
continuous_pi fun _i => continuous_matrix fun _j _k => hA.matrix_elem _ _
end BlockMatrices
end Continuity
/-! ### Lemmas about infinite sums -/
|
section tsum
variable [AddCommMonoid R] [TopologicalSpace R]
theorem HasSum.matrix_transpose {f : X → Matrix m n R} {a : Matrix m n R} (hf : HasSum f a) :
HasSum (fun x => (f x)ᵀ) aᵀ :=
(hf.map (Matrix.transposeAddEquiv m n R) continuous_id.matrix_transpose :)
| Mathlib/Topology/Instances/Matrix.lean | 265 | 273 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Card
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Lattice.Fold
/-!
# Down-compressions
This file defines down-compression.
Down-compressing `𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)` along `a : α` means removing `a` from the elements of `𝒜`,
when the resulting set is not already in `𝒜`.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.nonMemberSubfamily`: `𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a` is the subfamily of sets not containing
`a`.
* `Finset.memberSubfamily`: `𝒜.memberSubfamily a` is the image of the subfamily of sets containing
`a` under removing `a`.
* `Down.compression`: Down-compression.
## Notation
`𝓓 a 𝒜` is notation for `Down.compress a 𝒜` in locale `SetFamily`.
## References
* https://github.com/b-mehta/maths-notes/blob/master/iii/mich/combinatorics.pdf
## Tags
compression, down-compression
-/
variable {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] {𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)} {s : Finset α} {a : α}
namespace Finset
/-- Elements of `𝒜` that do not contain `a`. -/
def nonMemberSubfamily (a : α) (𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) : Finset (Finset α) := {s ∈ 𝒜 | a ∉ s}
/-- Image of the elements of `𝒜` which contain `a` under removing `a`. Finsets that do not contain
`a` such that `insert a s ∈ 𝒜`. -/
def memberSubfamily (a : α) (𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) : Finset (Finset α) :=
{s ∈ 𝒜 | a ∈ s}.image fun s => erase s a
@[simp]
theorem mem_nonMemberSubfamily : s ∈ 𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a ↔ s ∈ 𝒜 ∧ a ∉ s := by
simp [nonMemberSubfamily]
@[simp]
theorem mem_memberSubfamily : s ∈ 𝒜.memberSubfamily a ↔ insert a s ∈ 𝒜 ∧ a ∉ s := by
simp_rw [memberSubfamily, mem_image, mem_filter]
refine ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨insert a s, ⟨h.1, by simp⟩, erase_insert h.2⟩⟩
rintro ⟨s, ⟨hs1, hs2⟩, rfl⟩
rw [insert_erase hs2]
exact ⟨hs1, not_mem_erase _ _⟩
theorem nonMemberSubfamily_inter (a : α) (𝒜 ℬ : Finset (Finset α)) :
(𝒜 ∩ ℬ).nonMemberSubfamily a = 𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a ∩ ℬ.nonMemberSubfamily a :=
filter_inter_distrib _ _ _
theorem memberSubfamily_inter (a : α) (𝒜 ℬ : Finset (Finset α)) :
(𝒜 ∩ ℬ).memberSubfamily a = 𝒜.memberSubfamily a ∩ ℬ.memberSubfamily a := by
unfold memberSubfamily
rw [filter_inter_distrib, image_inter_of_injOn _ _ ((erase_injOn' _).mono _)]
simp
theorem nonMemberSubfamily_union (a : α) (𝒜 ℬ : Finset (Finset α)) :
(𝒜 ∪ ℬ).nonMemberSubfamily a = 𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a ∪ ℬ.nonMemberSubfamily a :=
filter_union _ _ _
theorem memberSubfamily_union (a : α) (𝒜 ℬ : Finset (Finset α)) :
(𝒜 ∪ ℬ).memberSubfamily a = 𝒜.memberSubfamily a ∪ ℬ.memberSubfamily a := by
simp_rw [memberSubfamily, filter_union, image_union]
theorem card_memberSubfamily_add_card_nonMemberSubfamily (a : α) (𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) :
#(𝒜.memberSubfamily a) + #(𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a) = #𝒜 := by
rw [memberSubfamily, nonMemberSubfamily, card_image_of_injOn]
· conv_rhs => rw [← filter_card_add_filter_neg_card_eq_card (fun s => (a ∈ s))]
· apply (erase_injOn' _).mono
simp
theorem memberSubfamily_union_nonMemberSubfamily (a : α) (𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) :
𝒜.memberSubfamily a ∪ 𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a = 𝒜.image fun s => s.erase a := by
ext s
simp only [mem_union, mem_memberSubfamily, mem_nonMemberSubfamily, mem_image, exists_prop]
constructor
· rintro (h | h)
· exact ⟨_, h.1, erase_insert h.2⟩
· exact ⟨_, h.1, erase_eq_of_not_mem h.2⟩
· rintro ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩
by_cases ha : a ∈ s
· exact Or.inl ⟨by rwa [insert_erase ha], not_mem_erase _ _⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨by rwa [erase_eq_of_not_mem ha], not_mem_erase _ _⟩
@[simp]
theorem memberSubfamily_memberSubfamily : (𝒜.memberSubfamily a).memberSubfamily a = ∅ := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem memberSubfamily_nonMemberSubfamily : (𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a).memberSubfamily a = ∅ := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem nonMemberSubfamily_memberSubfamily :
(𝒜.memberSubfamily a).nonMemberSubfamily a = 𝒜.memberSubfamily a := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem nonMemberSubfamily_nonMemberSubfamily :
(𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a).nonMemberSubfamily a = 𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a := by
ext
simp
lemma memberSubfamily_image_insert (h𝒜 : ∀ s ∈ 𝒜, a ∉ s) :
(𝒜.image <| insert a).memberSubfamily a = 𝒜 := by
ext s
simp only [mem_memberSubfamily, mem_image]
refine ⟨?_, fun hs ↦ ⟨⟨s, hs, rfl⟩, h𝒜 _ hs⟩⟩
rintro ⟨⟨t, ht, hts⟩, hs⟩
rwa [← insert_erase_invOn.2.injOn (h𝒜 _ ht) hs hts]
@[simp] lemma nonMemberSubfamily_image_insert : (𝒜.image <| insert a).nonMemberSubfamily a = ∅ := by
simp [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
@[simp] lemma memberSubfamily_image_erase : (𝒜.image (erase · a)).memberSubfamily a = ∅ := by
simp [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem,
(ne_of_mem_of_not_mem' (mem_insert_self _ _) (not_mem_erase _ _)).symm]
lemma image_insert_memberSubfamily (𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) (a : α) :
(𝒜.memberSubfamily a).image (insert a) = {s ∈ 𝒜 | a ∈ s} := by
ext s
simp only [mem_memberSubfamily, mem_image, mem_filter]
refine ⟨?_, fun ⟨hs, ha⟩ ↦ ⟨erase s a, ⟨?_, not_mem_erase _ _⟩, insert_erase ha⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨s, ⟨hs, -⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨hs, mem_insert_self _ _⟩
· rwa [insert_erase ha]
/-- Induction principle for finset families. To prove a statement for every finset family,
it suffices to prove it for
* the empty finset family.
* the finset family which only contains the empty finset.
* `ℬ ∪ {s ∪ {a} | s ∈ 𝒞}` assuming the property for `ℬ` and `𝒞`, where `a` is an element of the
ground type and `𝒜` and `ℬ` are families of finsets not containing `a`.
Note that instead of giving `ℬ` and `𝒞`, the `subfamily` case gives you
`𝒜 = ℬ ∪ {s ∪ {a} | s ∈ 𝒞}`, so that `ℬ = 𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily` and `𝒞 = 𝒜.memberSubfamily`.
This is a way of formalising induction on `n` where `𝒜` is a finset family on `n` elements.
See also `Finset.family_induction_on.` -/
@[elab_as_elim]
lemma memberFamily_induction_on {p : Finset (Finset α) → Prop}
(𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) (empty : p ∅) (singleton_empty : p {∅})
(subfamily : ∀ (a : α) ⦃𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)⦄,
p (𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a) → p (𝒜.memberSubfamily a) → p 𝒜) : p 𝒜 := by
set u := 𝒜.sup id
have hu : ∀ s ∈ 𝒜, s ⊆ u := fun s ↦ le_sup (f := id)
clear_value u
induction u using Finset.induction generalizing 𝒜 with
| empty =>
simp_rw [subset_empty] at hu
rw [← subset_singleton_iff', subset_singleton_iff] at hu
obtain rfl | rfl := hu <;> assumption
| insert a u _ ih =>
refine subfamily a (ih _ ?_) (ih _ ?_)
· simp only [mem_nonMemberSubfamily, and_imp]
exact fun s hs has ↦ (subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem has).1 <| hu _ hs
· simp only [mem_memberSubfamily, and_imp]
exact fun s hs ha ↦ (insert_subset_insert_iff ha).1 <| hu _ hs
/-- Induction principle for finset families. To prove a statement for every finset family,
it suffices to prove it for
* the empty finset family.
* the finset family which only contains the empty finset.
* `{s ∪ {a} | s ∈ 𝒜}` assuming the property for `𝒜` a family of finsets not containing `a`.
* `ℬ ∪ 𝒞` assuming the property for `ℬ` and `𝒞`, where `a` is an element of the ground type and
`ℬ`is a family of finsets not containing `a` and `𝒞` a family of finsets containing `a`.
Note that instead of giving `ℬ` and `𝒞`, the `subfamily` case gives you `𝒜 = ℬ ∪ 𝒞`, so that
`ℬ = {s ∈ 𝒜 | a ∉ s}` and `𝒞 = {s ∈ 𝒜 | a ∈ s}`.
This is a way of formalising induction on `n` where `𝒜` is a finset family on `n` elements.
See also `Finset.memberFamily_induction_on.` -/
@[elab_as_elim]
| protected lemma family_induction_on {p : Finset (Finset α) → Prop}
(𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) (empty : p ∅) (singleton_empty : p {∅})
(image_insert : ∀ (a : α) ⦃𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)⦄,
(∀ s ∈ 𝒜, a ∉ s) → p 𝒜 → p (𝒜.image <| insert a))
(subfamily : ∀ (a : α) ⦃𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)⦄,
p {s ∈ 𝒜 | a ∉ s} → p {s ∈ 𝒜 | a ∈ s} → p 𝒜) : p 𝒜 := by
refine memberFamily_induction_on 𝒜 empty singleton_empty fun a 𝒜 h𝒜₀ h𝒜₁ ↦ subfamily a h𝒜₀ ?_
rw [← image_insert_memberSubfamily]
exact image_insert _ (by simp) h𝒜₁
end Finset
open Finset
-- The namespace is here to distinguish from other compressions.
namespace Down
/-- `a`-down-compressing `𝒜` means removing `a` from the elements of `𝒜` that contain it, when the
resulting Finset is not already in `𝒜`. -/
def compression (a : α) (𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) : Finset (Finset α) :=
{s ∈ 𝒜 | erase s a ∈ 𝒜}.disjUnion {s ∈ 𝒜.image fun s ↦ erase s a | s ∉ 𝒜} <|
disjoint_left.2 fun _s h₁ h₂ ↦ (mem_filter.1 h₂).2 (mem_filter.1 h₁).1
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SetFamily/Compression/Down.lean | 193 | 215 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Frédéric Dupuis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Field
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Balance
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Expect
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Star.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.CStarAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Operator.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Sqrt
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.VectorSpace
/-!
# `RCLike`: a typeclass for ℝ or ℂ
This file defines the typeclass `RCLike` intended to have only two instances:
ℝ and ℂ. It is meant for definitions and theorems which hold for both the real and the complex case,
and in particular when the real case follows directly from the complex case by setting `re` to `id`,
`im` to zero and so on. Its API follows closely that of ℂ.
Applications include defining inner products and Hilbert spaces for both the real and
complex case. One typically produces the definitions and proof for an arbitrary field of this
typeclass, which basically amounts to doing the complex case, and the two cases then fall out
immediately from the two instances of the class.
The instance for `ℝ` is registered in this file.
The instance for `ℂ` is declared in `Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/Basic.lean`.
## Implementation notes
The coercion from reals into an `RCLike` field is done by registering `RCLike.ofReal` as
a `CoeTC`. For this to work, we must proceed carefully to avoid problems involving circular
coercions in the case `K=ℝ`; in particular, we cannot use the plain `Coe` and must set
priorities carefully. This problem was already solved for `ℕ`, and we copy the solution detailed
in `Mathlib/Data/Nat/Cast/Defs.lean`. See also Note [coercion into rings] for more details.
In addition, several lemmas need to be set at priority 900 to make sure that they do not override
their counterparts in `Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/Basic.lean` (which causes linter errors).
A few lemmas requiring heavier imports are in `Mathlib/Analysis/RCLike/Lemmas.lean`.
-/
open Fintype
open scoped BigOperators ComplexConjugate
section
local notation "𝓚" => algebraMap ℝ _
/--
This typeclass captures properties shared by ℝ and ℂ, with an API that closely matches that of ℂ.
-/
class RCLike (K : semiOutParam Type*) extends DenselyNormedField K, StarRing K,
NormedAlgebra ℝ K, CompleteSpace K where
/-- The real part as an additive monoid homomorphism -/
re : K →+ ℝ
/-- The imaginary part as an additive monoid homomorphism -/
im : K →+ ℝ
/-- Imaginary unit in `K`. Meant to be set to `0` for `K = ℝ`. -/
I : K
I_re_ax : re I = 0
I_mul_I_ax : I = 0 ∨ I * I = -1
re_add_im_ax : ∀ z : K, 𝓚 (re z) + 𝓚 (im z) * I = z
ofReal_re_ax : ∀ r : ℝ, re (𝓚 r) = r
ofReal_im_ax : ∀ r : ℝ, im (𝓚 r) = 0
mul_re_ax : ∀ z w : K, re (z * w) = re z * re w - im z * im w
mul_im_ax : ∀ z w : K, im (z * w) = re z * im w + im z * re w
conj_re_ax : ∀ z : K, re (conj z) = re z
conj_im_ax : ∀ z : K, im (conj z) = -im z
conj_I_ax : conj I = -I
norm_sq_eq_def_ax : ∀ z : K, ‖z‖ ^ 2 = re z * re z + im z * im z
mul_im_I_ax : ∀ z : K, im z * im I = im z
/-- only an instance in the `ComplexOrder` locale -/
[toPartialOrder : PartialOrder K]
le_iff_re_im {z w : K} : z ≤ w ↔ re z ≤ re w ∧ im z = im w
-- note we cannot put this in the `extends` clause
[toDecidableEq : DecidableEq K]
scoped[ComplexOrder] attribute [instance 100] RCLike.toPartialOrder
attribute [instance 100] RCLike.toDecidableEq
end
variable {K E : Type*} [RCLike K]
namespace RCLike
/-- Coercion from `ℝ` to an `RCLike` field. -/
@[coe] abbrev ofReal : ℝ → K := Algebra.cast
/- The priority must be set at 900 to ensure that coercions are tried in the right order.
See Note [coercion into rings], or `Mathlib/Data/Nat/Cast/Basic.lean` for more details. -/
noncomputable instance (priority := 900) algebraMapCoe : CoeTC ℝ K :=
⟨ofReal⟩
theorem ofReal_alg (x : ℝ) : (x : K) = x • (1 : K) :=
Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one x
theorem real_smul_eq_coe_mul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : r • z = (r : K) * z :=
Algebra.smul_def r z
theorem real_smul_eq_coe_smul [AddCommGroup E] [Module K E] [Module ℝ E] [IsScalarTower ℝ K E]
(r : ℝ) (x : E) : r • x = (r : K) • x := by rw [RCLike.ofReal_alg, smul_one_smul]
theorem algebraMap_eq_ofReal : ⇑(algebraMap ℝ K) = ofReal :=
rfl
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem re_add_im (z : K) : (re z : K) + im z * I = z :=
RCLike.re_add_im_ax z
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem ofReal_re : ∀ r : ℝ, re (r : K) = r :=
RCLike.ofReal_re_ax
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem ofReal_im : ∀ r : ℝ, im (r : K) = 0 :=
RCLike.ofReal_im_ax
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem mul_re : ∀ z w : K, re (z * w) = re z * re w - im z * im w :=
RCLike.mul_re_ax
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem mul_im : ∀ z w : K, im (z * w) = re z * im w + im z * re w :=
RCLike.mul_im_ax
theorem ext_iff {z w : K} : z = w ↔ re z = re w ∧ im z = im w :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => re_add_im z ▸ re_add_im w ▸ h₁ ▸ h₂ ▸ rfl⟩
theorem ext {z w : K} (hre : re z = re w) (him : im z = im w) : z = w :=
ext_iff.2 ⟨hre, him⟩
@[norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_zero : ((0 : ℝ) : K) = 0 :=
algebraMap.coe_zero
@[rclike_simps]
theorem zero_re' : re (0 : K) = (0 : ℝ) :=
map_zero re
@[norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_one : ((1 : ℝ) : K) = 1 :=
map_one (algebraMap ℝ K)
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem one_re : re (1 : K) = 1 := by rw [← ofReal_one, ofReal_re]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem one_im : im (1 : K) = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_one, ofReal_im]
theorem ofReal_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : ℝ → K) :=
(algebraMap ℝ K).injective
@[norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_inj {z w : ℝ} : (z : K) = (w : K) ↔ z = w :=
algebraMap.coe_inj
-- replaced by `RCLike.ofNat_re`
-- replaced by `RCLike.ofNat_im`
theorem ofReal_eq_zero {x : ℝ} : (x : K) = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
algebraMap.lift_map_eq_zero_iff x
theorem ofReal_ne_zero {x : ℝ} : (x : K) ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
ofReal_eq_zero.not
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_add (r s : ℝ) : ((r + s : ℝ) : K) = r + s :=
algebraMap.coe_add _ _
-- replaced by `RCLike.ofReal_ofNat`
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_neg (r : ℝ) : ((-r : ℝ) : K) = -r :=
algebraMap.coe_neg r
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_sub (r s : ℝ) : ((r - s : ℝ) : K) = r - s :=
map_sub (algebraMap ℝ K) r s
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_sum {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ) :
((∑ i ∈ s, f i : ℝ) : K) = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i : K) :=
map_sum (algebraMap ℝ K) _ _
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_finsupp_sum {α M : Type*} [Zero M] (f : α →₀ M) (g : α → M → ℝ) :
((f.sum fun a b => g a b : ℝ) : K) = f.sum fun a b => (g a b : K) :=
map_finsuppSum (algebraMap ℝ K) f g
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_mul (r s : ℝ) : ((r * s : ℝ) : K) = r * s :=
algebraMap.coe_mul _ _
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_pow (r : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ((r ^ n : ℝ) : K) = (r : K) ^ n :=
map_pow (algebraMap ℝ K) r n
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_prod {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ) :
((∏ i ∈ s, f i : ℝ) : K) = ∏ i ∈ s, (f i : K) :=
map_prod (algebraMap ℝ K) _ _
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_finsuppProd {α M : Type*} [Zero M] (f : α →₀ M) (g : α → M → ℝ) :
((f.prod fun a b => g a b : ℝ) : K) = f.prod fun a b => (g a b : K) :=
map_finsuppProd _ f g
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-06")] alias ofReal_finsupp_prod := ofReal_finsuppProd
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem real_smul_ofReal (r x : ℝ) : r • (x : K) = (r : K) * (x : K) :=
real_smul_eq_coe_mul _ _
@[rclike_simps]
theorem re_ofReal_mul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : re (↑r * z) = r * re z := by
simp only [mul_re, ofReal_im, zero_mul, ofReal_re, sub_zero]
@[rclike_simps]
theorem im_ofReal_mul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : im (↑r * z) = r * im z := by
simp only [add_zero, ofReal_im, zero_mul, ofReal_re, mul_im]
@[rclike_simps]
theorem smul_re (r : ℝ) (z : K) : re (r • z) = r * re z := by
rw [real_smul_eq_coe_mul, re_ofReal_mul]
@[rclike_simps]
theorem smul_im (r : ℝ) (z : K) : im (r • z) = r * im z := by
rw [real_smul_eq_coe_mul, im_ofReal_mul]
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem norm_ofReal (r : ℝ) : ‖(r : K)‖ = |r| :=
norm_algebraMap' K r
/-! ### Characteristic zero -/
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- ℝ and ℂ are both of characteristic zero. -/
instance (priority := 100) charZero_rclike : CharZero K :=
(RingHom.charZero_iff (algebraMap ℝ K).injective).1 inferInstance
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_expect {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ) : 𝔼 i ∈ s, f i = 𝔼 i ∈ s, (f i : K) :=
map_expect (algebraMap ..) ..
@[norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_balance {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (f : ι → ℝ) (i : ι) :
((balance f i : ℝ) : K) = balance ((↑) ∘ f) i := map_balance (algebraMap ..) ..
@[simp] lemma ofReal_comp_balance {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (f : ι → ℝ) :
ofReal ∘ balance f = balance (ofReal ∘ f : ι → K) := funext <| ofReal_balance _
/-! ### The imaginary unit, `I` -/
/-- The imaginary unit. -/
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem I_re : re (I : K) = 0 :=
I_re_ax
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem I_im (z : K) : im z * im (I : K) = im z :=
mul_im_I_ax z
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem I_im' (z : K) : im (I : K) * im z = im z := by rw [mul_comm, I_im]
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem I_mul_re (z : K) : re (I * z) = -im z := by
simp only [I_re, zero_sub, I_im', zero_mul, mul_re]
theorem I_mul_I : (I : K) = 0 ∨ (I : K) * I = -1 :=
I_mul_I_ax
variable (𝕜) in
lemma I_eq_zero_or_im_I_eq_one : (I : K) = 0 ∨ im (I : K) = 1 :=
I_mul_I (K := K) |>.imp_right fun h ↦ by simpa [h] using (I_mul_re (I : K)).symm
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem conj_re (z : K) : re (conj z) = re z :=
RCLike.conj_re_ax z
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem conj_im (z : K) : im (conj z) = -im z :=
RCLike.conj_im_ax z
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem conj_I : conj (I : K) = -I :=
RCLike.conj_I_ax
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem conj_ofReal (r : ℝ) : conj (r : K) = (r : K) := by
rw [ext_iff]
simp only [ofReal_im, conj_im, eq_self_iff_true, conj_re, and_self_iff, neg_zero]
-- replaced by `RCLike.conj_ofNat`
theorem conj_nat_cast (n : ℕ) : conj (n : K) = n := map_natCast _ _
theorem conj_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : conj (ofNat(n) : K) = ofNat(n) :=
map_ofNat _ _
@[rclike_simps, simp]
theorem conj_neg_I : conj (-I) = (I : K) := by rw [map_neg, conj_I, neg_neg]
theorem conj_eq_re_sub_im (z : K) : conj z = re z - im z * I :=
(congr_arg conj (re_add_im z).symm).trans <| by
rw [map_add, map_mul, conj_I, conj_ofReal, conj_ofReal, mul_neg, sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem sub_conj (z : K) : z - conj z = 2 * im z * I :=
calc
z - conj z = re z + im z * I - (re z - im z * I) := by rw [re_add_im, ← conj_eq_re_sub_im]
_ = 2 * im z * I := by rw [add_sub_sub_cancel, ← two_mul, mul_assoc]
@[rclike_simps]
theorem conj_smul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : conj (r • z) = r • conj z := by
rw [conj_eq_re_sub_im, conj_eq_re_sub_im, smul_re, smul_im, ofReal_mul, ofReal_mul,
real_smul_eq_coe_mul r (_ - _), mul_sub, mul_assoc]
theorem add_conj (z : K) : z + conj z = 2 * re z :=
calc
z + conj z = re z + im z * I + (re z - im z * I) := by rw [re_add_im, conj_eq_re_sub_im]
_ = 2 * re z := by rw [add_add_sub_cancel, two_mul]
theorem re_eq_add_conj (z : K) : ↑(re z) = (z + conj z) / 2 := by
rw [add_conj, mul_div_cancel_left₀ (re z : K) two_ne_zero]
theorem im_eq_conj_sub (z : K) : ↑(im z) = I * (conj z - z) / 2 := by
rw [← neg_inj, ← ofReal_neg, ← I_mul_re, re_eq_add_conj, map_mul, conj_I, ← neg_div, ← mul_neg,
neg_sub, mul_sub, neg_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
open List in
/-- There are several equivalent ways to say that a number `z` is in fact a real number. -/
theorem is_real_TFAE (z : K) : TFAE [conj z = z, ∃ r : ℝ, (r : K) = z, ↑(re z) = z, im z = 0] := by
tfae_have 1 → 4
| h => by
rw [← @ofReal_inj K, im_eq_conj_sub, h, sub_self, mul_zero, zero_div,
ofReal_zero]
tfae_have 4 → 3
| h => by
conv_rhs => rw [← re_add_im z, h, ofReal_zero, zero_mul, add_zero]
tfae_have 3 → 2 := fun h => ⟨_, h⟩
tfae_have 2 → 1 := fun ⟨r, hr⟩ => hr ▸ conj_ofReal _
tfae_finish
theorem conj_eq_iff_real {z : K} : conj z = z ↔ ∃ r : ℝ, z = (r : K) :=
calc
_ ↔ ∃ r : ℝ, (r : K) = z := (is_real_TFAE z).out 0 1
_ ↔ _ := by simp only [eq_comm]
theorem conj_eq_iff_re {z : K} : conj z = z ↔ (re z : K) = z :=
(is_real_TFAE z).out 0 2
theorem conj_eq_iff_im {z : K} : conj z = z ↔ im z = 0 :=
(is_real_TFAE z).out 0 3
@[simp]
theorem star_def : (Star.star : K → K) = conj :=
rfl
variable (K)
/-- Conjugation as a ring equivalence. This is used to convert the inner product into a
sesquilinear product. -/
abbrev conjToRingEquiv : K ≃+* Kᵐᵒᵖ :=
starRingEquiv
variable {K} {z : K}
/-- The norm squared function. -/
def normSq : K →*₀ ℝ where
toFun z := re z * re z + im z * im z
map_zero' := by simp only [add_zero, mul_zero, map_zero]
map_one' := by simp only [one_im, add_zero, mul_one, one_re, mul_zero]
map_mul' z w := by
simp only [mul_im, mul_re]
ring
theorem normSq_apply (z : K) : normSq z = re z * re z + im z * im z :=
rfl
theorem norm_sq_eq_def {z : K} : ‖z‖ ^ 2 = re z * re z + im z * im z :=
norm_sq_eq_def_ax z
theorem normSq_eq_def' (z : K) : normSq z = ‖z‖ ^ 2 :=
norm_sq_eq_def.symm
@[rclike_simps]
theorem normSq_zero : normSq (0 : K) = 0 :=
normSq.map_zero
@[rclike_simps]
theorem normSq_one : normSq (1 : K) = 1 :=
normSq.map_one
theorem normSq_nonneg (z : K) : 0 ≤ normSq z :=
add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _) (mul_self_nonneg _)
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem normSq_eq_zero {z : K} : normSq z = 0 ↔ z = 0 :=
map_eq_zero _
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem normSq_pos {z : K} : 0 < normSq z ↔ z ≠ 0 := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, Ne, eq_comm]; simp [normSq_nonneg]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem normSq_neg (z : K) : normSq (-z) = normSq z := by simp only [normSq_eq_def', norm_neg]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem normSq_conj (z : K) : normSq (conj z) = normSq z := by
simp only [normSq_apply, neg_mul, mul_neg, neg_neg, rclike_simps]
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem normSq_mul (z w : K) : normSq (z * w) = normSq z * normSq w :=
map_mul _ z w
theorem normSq_add (z w : K) : normSq (z + w) = normSq z + normSq w + 2 * re (z * conj w) := by
simp only [normSq_apply, map_add, rclike_simps]
ring
theorem re_sq_le_normSq (z : K) : re z * re z ≤ normSq z :=
le_add_of_nonneg_right (mul_self_nonneg _)
theorem im_sq_le_normSq (z : K) : im z * im z ≤ normSq z :=
le_add_of_nonneg_left (mul_self_nonneg _)
theorem mul_conj (z : K) : z * conj z = ‖z‖ ^ 2 := by
apply ext <;> simp [← ofReal_pow, norm_sq_eq_def, mul_comm]
theorem conj_mul (z : K) : conj z * z = ‖z‖ ^ 2 := by rw [mul_comm, mul_conj]
lemma inv_eq_conj (hz : ‖z‖ = 1) : z⁻¹ = conj z :=
inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_left <| by simp_rw [conj_mul, hz, algebraMap.coe_one, one_pow]
theorem normSq_sub (z w : K) : normSq (z - w) = normSq z + normSq w - 2 * re (z * conj w) := by
simp only [normSq_add, sub_eq_add_neg, map_neg, mul_neg, normSq_neg, map_neg]
theorem sqrt_normSq_eq_norm {z : K} : √(normSq z) = ‖z‖ := by
rw [normSq_eq_def', Real.sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)]
/-! ### Inversion -/
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_inv (r : ℝ) : ((r⁻¹ : ℝ) : K) = (r : K)⁻¹ :=
map_inv₀ _ r
theorem inv_def (z : K) : z⁻¹ = conj z * ((‖z‖ ^ 2)⁻¹ : ℝ) := by
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | h₀)
· simp
· apply inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right
rw [← mul_assoc, mul_conj, ofReal_inv, ofReal_pow, mul_inv_cancel₀]
simpa
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem inv_re (z : K) : re z⁻¹ = re z / normSq z := by
rw [inv_def, normSq_eq_def', mul_comm, re_ofReal_mul, conj_re, div_eq_inv_mul]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem inv_im (z : K) : im z⁻¹ = -im z / normSq z := by
rw [inv_def, normSq_eq_def', mul_comm, im_ofReal_mul, conj_im, div_eq_inv_mul]
theorem div_re (z w : K) : re (z / w) = re z * re w / normSq w + im z * im w / normSq w := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_mul, mul_neg, neg_neg, map_neg,
rclike_simps]
theorem div_im (z w : K) : im (z / w) = im z * re w / normSq w - re z * im w / normSq w := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, neg_mul, mul_neg, map_neg,
rclike_simps]
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem conj_inv (x : K) : conj x⁻¹ = (conj x)⁻¹ :=
star_inv₀ _
lemma conj_div (x y : K) : conj (x / y) = conj x / conj y := map_div' conj conj_inv _ _
--TODO: Do we rather want the map as an explicit definition?
lemma exists_norm_eq_mul_self (x : K) : ∃ c, ‖c‖ = 1 ∧ ↑‖x‖ = c * x := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· exact ⟨1, by simp⟩
· exact ⟨‖x‖ / x, by simp [norm_ne_zero_iff.2, hx]⟩
lemma exists_norm_mul_eq_self (x : K) : ∃ c, ‖c‖ = 1 ∧ c * ‖x‖ = x := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· exact ⟨1, by simp⟩
· exact ⟨x / ‖x‖, by simp [norm_ne_zero_iff.2, hx]⟩
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_div (r s : ℝ) : ((r / s : ℝ) : K) = r / s :=
map_div₀ (algebraMap ℝ K) r s
theorem div_re_ofReal {z : K} {r : ℝ} : re (z / r) = re z / r := by
rw [div_eq_inv_mul, div_eq_inv_mul, ← ofReal_inv, re_ofReal_mul]
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_zpow (r : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ((r ^ n : ℝ) : K) = (r : K) ^ n :=
map_zpow₀ (algebraMap ℝ K) r n
theorem I_mul_I_of_nonzero : (I : K) ≠ 0 → (I : K) * I = -1 :=
I_mul_I_ax.resolve_left
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem inv_I : (I : K)⁻¹ = -I := by
by_cases h : (I : K) = 0
· simp [h]
· field_simp [I_mul_I_of_nonzero h]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem div_I (z : K) : z / I = -(z * I) := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_I, mul_neg]
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem normSq_inv (z : K) : normSq z⁻¹ = (normSq z)⁻¹ :=
map_inv₀ normSq z
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem normSq_div (z w : K) : normSq (z / w) = normSq z / normSq w :=
map_div₀ normSq z w
@[simp 1100, rclike_simps]
theorem norm_conj (z : K) : ‖conj z‖ = ‖z‖ := by simp only [← sqrt_normSq_eq_norm, normSq_conj]
@[simp, rclike_simps] lemma nnnorm_conj (z : K) : ‖conj z‖₊ = ‖z‖₊ := by simp [nnnorm]
@[simp, rclike_simps] lemma enorm_conj (z : K) : ‖conj z‖ₑ = ‖z‖ₑ := by simp [enorm]
instance (priority := 100) : CStarRing K where
norm_mul_self_le x := le_of_eq <| ((norm_mul _ _).trans <| congr_arg (· * ‖x‖) (norm_conj _)).symm
instance : StarModule ℝ K where
star_smul r a := by
apply RCLike.ext <;> simp [RCLike.smul_re, RCLike.smul_im]
/-! ### Cast lemmas -/
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_natCast (n : ℕ) : ((n : ℝ) : K) = n :=
map_natCast (algebraMap ℝ K) n
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : ((q : ℝ) : K) = q := map_nnratCast (algebraMap ℝ K) _
@[simp, rclike_simps] -- Porting note: removed `norm_cast`
theorem natCast_re (n : ℕ) : re (n : K) = n := by rw [← ofReal_natCast, ofReal_re]
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_im (n : ℕ) : im (n : K) = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_natCast, ofReal_im]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem ofNat_re (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : re (ofNat(n) : K) = ofNat(n) :=
natCast_re n
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem ofNat_im (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : im (ofNat(n) : K) = 0 :=
natCast_im n
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ((ofNat(n) : ℝ) : K) = ofNat(n) :=
ofReal_natCast n
theorem ofNat_mul_re (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (z : K) :
re (ofNat(n) * z) = ofNat(n) * re z := by
rw [← ofReal_ofNat, re_ofReal_mul]
theorem ofNat_mul_im (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (z : K) :
im (ofNat(n) * z) = ofNat(n) * im z := by
rw [← ofReal_ofNat, im_ofReal_mul]
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_intCast (n : ℤ) : ((n : ℝ) : K) = n :=
map_intCast _ n
@[simp, rclike_simps] -- Porting note: removed `norm_cast`
theorem intCast_re (n : ℤ) : re (n : K) = n := by rw [← ofReal_intCast, ofReal_re]
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_im (n : ℤ) : im (n : K) = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_intCast, ofReal_im]
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_ratCast (n : ℚ) : ((n : ℝ) : K) = n :=
map_ratCast _ n
@[simp, rclike_simps] -- Porting note: removed `norm_cast`
theorem ratCast_re (q : ℚ) : re (q : K) = q := by rw [← ofReal_ratCast, ofReal_re]
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ratCast_im (q : ℚ) : im (q : K) = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_ratCast, ofReal_im]
/-! ### Norm -/
theorem norm_of_nonneg {r : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ r) : ‖(r : K)‖ = r :=
(norm_ofReal _).trans (abs_of_nonneg h)
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem norm_natCast (n : ℕ) : ‖(n : K)‖ = n := by
rw [← ofReal_natCast]
exact norm_of_nonneg (Nat.cast_nonneg n)
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast] lemma nnnorm_natCast (n : ℕ) : ‖(n : K)‖₊ = n := by simp [nnnorm]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem norm_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ‖(ofNat(n) : K)‖ = ofNat(n) :=
norm_natCast n
@[simp, rclike_simps]
lemma nnnorm_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ‖(ofNat(n) : K)‖₊ = ofNat(n) :=
nnnorm_natCast n
lemma norm_two : ‖(2 : K)‖ = 2 := norm_ofNat 2
lemma nnnorm_two : ‖(2 : K)‖₊ = 2 := nnnorm_ofNat 2
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
lemma norm_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : ‖(q : K)‖ = q := by
rw [← ofReal_nnratCast]; exact norm_of_nonneg q.cast_nonneg
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
lemma nnnorm_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : ‖(q : K)‖₊ = q := by simp [nnnorm]
variable (K) in
lemma norm_nsmul [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace K E] (n : ℕ) (x : E) : ‖n • x‖ = n • ‖x‖ := by
simpa [Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul] using norm_smul (n : K) x
variable (K) in
lemma nnnorm_nsmul [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace K E] (n : ℕ) (x : E) :
‖n • x‖₊ = n • ‖x‖₊ := by simpa [Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul] using nnnorm_smul (n : K) x
section NormedField
variable [NormedField E] [CharZero E] [NormedSpace K E]
include K
variable (K) in
lemma norm_nnqsmul (q : ℚ≥0) (x : E) : ‖q • x‖ = q • ‖x‖ := by
simpa [NNRat.cast_smul_eq_nnqsmul] using norm_smul (q : K) x
variable (K) in
lemma nnnorm_nnqsmul (q : ℚ≥0) (x : E) : ‖q • x‖₊ = q • ‖x‖₊ := by
simpa [NNRat.cast_smul_eq_nnqsmul] using nnnorm_smul (q : K) x
@[bound]
lemma norm_expect_le {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → E} : ‖𝔼 i ∈ s, f i‖ ≤ 𝔼 i ∈ s, ‖f i‖ :=
Finset.le_expect_of_subadditive norm_zero norm_add_le fun _ _ ↦ by rw [norm_nnqsmul K]
end NormedField
theorem mul_self_norm (z : K) : ‖z‖ * ‖z‖ = normSq z := by rw [normSq_eq_def', sq]
attribute [rclike_simps] norm_zero norm_one norm_eq_zero abs_norm norm_inv norm_div
theorem abs_re_le_norm (z : K) : |re z| ≤ ‖z‖ := by
rw [mul_self_le_mul_self_iff (abs_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _), abs_mul_abs_self, mul_self_norm]
apply re_sq_le_normSq
theorem abs_im_le_norm (z : K) : |im z| ≤ ‖z‖ := by
rw [mul_self_le_mul_self_iff (abs_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _), abs_mul_abs_self, mul_self_norm]
apply im_sq_le_normSq
theorem norm_re_le_norm (z : K) : ‖re z‖ ≤ ‖z‖ :=
abs_re_le_norm z
theorem norm_im_le_norm (z : K) : ‖im z‖ ≤ ‖z‖ :=
abs_im_le_norm z
theorem re_le_norm (z : K) : re z ≤ ‖z‖ :=
(abs_le.1 (abs_re_le_norm z)).2
theorem im_le_norm (z : K) : im z ≤ ‖z‖ :=
(abs_le.1 (abs_im_le_norm _)).2
theorem im_eq_zero_of_le {a : K} (h : ‖a‖ ≤ re a) : im a = 0 := by
simpa only [mul_self_norm a, normSq_apply, left_eq_add, mul_self_eq_zero]
using congr_arg (fun z => z * z) ((re_le_norm a).antisymm h)
theorem re_eq_self_of_le {a : K} (h : ‖a‖ ≤ re a) : (re a : K) = a := by
rw [← conj_eq_iff_re, conj_eq_iff_im, im_eq_zero_of_le h]
open IsAbsoluteValue
theorem abs_re_div_norm_le_one (z : K) : |re z / ‖z‖| ≤ 1 := by
rw [abs_div, abs_norm]
exact div_le_one_of_le₀ (abs_re_le_norm _) (norm_nonneg _)
theorem abs_im_div_norm_le_one (z : K) : |im z / ‖z‖| ≤ 1 := by
rw [abs_div, abs_norm]
exact div_le_one_of_le₀ (abs_im_le_norm _) (norm_nonneg _)
theorem norm_I_of_ne_zero (hI : (I : K) ≠ 0) : ‖(I : K)‖ = 1 := by
rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg I) zero_le_one, one_mul, ← norm_mul,
I_mul_I_of_nonzero hI, norm_neg, norm_one]
theorem re_eq_norm_of_mul_conj (x : K) : re (x * conj x) = ‖x * conj x‖ := by
rw [mul_conj, ← ofReal_pow]; simp [-map_pow]
theorem norm_sq_re_add_conj (x : K) : ‖x + conj x‖ ^ 2 = re (x + conj x) ^ 2 := by
rw [add_conj, ← ofReal_ofNat, ← ofReal_mul, norm_ofReal, sq_abs, ofReal_re]
theorem norm_sq_re_conj_add (x : K) : ‖conj x + x‖ ^ 2 = re (conj x + x) ^ 2 := by
rw [add_comm, norm_sq_re_add_conj]
/-! ### Cauchy sequences -/
theorem isCauSeq_re (f : CauSeq K norm) : IsCauSeq abs fun n => re (f n) := fun _ ε0 =>
(f.cauchy ε0).imp fun i H j ij =>
lt_of_le_of_lt (by simpa only [map_sub] using abs_re_le_norm (f j - f i)) (H _ ij)
theorem isCauSeq_im (f : CauSeq K norm) : IsCauSeq abs fun n => im (f n) := fun _ ε0 =>
(f.cauchy ε0).imp fun i H j ij =>
lt_of_le_of_lt (by simpa only [map_sub] using abs_im_le_norm (f j - f i)) (H _ ij)
/-- The real part of a K Cauchy sequence, as a real Cauchy sequence. -/
noncomputable def cauSeqRe (f : CauSeq K norm) : CauSeq ℝ abs :=
⟨_, isCauSeq_re f⟩
/-- The imaginary part of a K Cauchy sequence, as a real Cauchy sequence. -/
noncomputable def cauSeqIm (f : CauSeq K norm) : CauSeq ℝ abs :=
⟨_, isCauSeq_im f⟩
theorem isCauSeq_norm {f : ℕ → K} (hf : IsCauSeq norm f) : IsCauSeq abs (norm ∘ f) := fun ε ε0 =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hf ε ε0
⟨i, fun j hj => lt_of_le_of_lt (abs_norm_sub_norm_le _ _) (hi j hj)⟩
end RCLike
section Instances
noncomputable instance Real.instRCLike : RCLike ℝ where
re := AddMonoidHom.id ℝ
im := 0
I := 0
I_re_ax := by simp only [AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
I_mul_I_ax := Or.intro_left _ rfl
re_add_im_ax z := by
simp only [add_zero, mul_zero, Algebra.id.map_eq_id, RingHom.id_apply, AddMonoidHom.id_apply]
ofReal_re_ax _ := rfl
ofReal_im_ax _ := rfl
mul_re_ax z w := by simp only [sub_zero, mul_zero, AddMonoidHom.zero_apply, AddMonoidHom.id_apply]
mul_im_ax z w := by simp only [add_zero, zero_mul, mul_zero, AddMonoidHom.zero_apply]
conj_re_ax z := by simp only [starRingEnd_apply, star_id_of_comm]
conj_im_ax _ := by simp only [neg_zero, AddMonoidHom.zero_apply]
conj_I_ax := by simp only [RingHom.map_zero, neg_zero]
norm_sq_eq_def_ax z := by simp only [sq, Real.norm_eq_abs, ← abs_mul, abs_mul_self z, add_zero,
mul_zero, AddMonoidHom.zero_apply, AddMonoidHom.id_apply]
mul_im_I_ax _ := by simp only [mul_zero, AddMonoidHom.zero_apply]
le_iff_re_im := (and_iff_left rfl).symm
end Instances
namespace RCLike
section Order
open scoped ComplexOrder
variable {z w : K}
theorem lt_iff_re_im : z < w ↔ re z < re w ∧ im z = im w := by
simp_rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, @RCLike.le_iff_re_im K]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨hr, hi⟩, heq⟩
exact ⟨⟨hr, mt (fun hreq => ext hreq hi) heq⟩, hi⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨hr, hrn⟩, hi⟩
exact ⟨⟨hr, hi⟩, ne_of_apply_ne _ hrn⟩
theorem nonneg_iff : 0 ≤ z ↔ 0 ≤ re z ∧ im z = 0 := by
simpa only [map_zero, eq_comm] using le_iff_re_im (z := 0) (w := z)
theorem pos_iff : 0 < z ↔ 0 < re z ∧ im z = 0 := by
simpa only [map_zero, eq_comm] using lt_iff_re_im (z := 0) (w := z)
theorem nonpos_iff : z ≤ 0 ↔ re z ≤ 0 ∧ im z = 0 := by
simpa only [map_zero] using le_iff_re_im (z := z) (w := 0)
theorem neg_iff : z < 0 ↔ re z < 0 ∧ im z = 0 := by
simpa only [map_zero] using lt_iff_re_im (z := z) (w := 0)
lemma nonneg_iff_exists_ofReal : 0 ≤ z ↔ ∃ x ≥ (0 : ℝ), x = z := by
simp_rw [nonneg_iff (K := K), ext_iff (K := K)]; aesop
lemma pos_iff_exists_ofReal : 0 < z ↔ ∃ x > (0 : ℝ), x = z := by
simp_rw [pos_iff (K := K), ext_iff (K := K)]; aesop
lemma nonpos_iff_exists_ofReal : z ≤ 0 ↔ ∃ x ≤ (0 : ℝ), x = z := by
simp_rw [nonpos_iff (K := K), ext_iff (K := K)]; aesop
lemma neg_iff_exists_ofReal : z < 0 ↔ ∃ x < (0 : ℝ), x = z := by
simp_rw [neg_iff (K := K), ext_iff (K := K)]; aesop
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_le_ofReal {x y : ℝ} : (x : K) ≤ (y : K) ↔ x ≤ y := by
rw [le_iff_re_im]
simp
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_lt_ofReal {x y : ℝ} : (x : K) < (y : K) ↔ x < y := by
rw [lt_iff_re_im]
simp
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_nonneg {x : ℝ} : 0 ≤ (x : K) ↔ 0 ≤ x := by
rw [← ofReal_zero, ofReal_le_ofReal]
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_nonpos {x : ℝ} : (x : K) ≤ 0 ↔ x ≤ 0 := by
rw [← ofReal_zero, ofReal_le_ofReal]
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_pos {x : ℝ} : 0 < (x : K) ↔ 0 < x := by
rw [← ofReal_zero, ofReal_lt_ofReal]
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_lt_zero {x : ℝ} : (x : K) < 0 ↔ x < 0 := by
rw [← ofReal_zero, ofReal_lt_ofReal]
protected lemma inv_pos_of_pos (hz : 0 < z) : 0 < z⁻¹ := by
rw [pos_iff_exists_ofReal] at hz
obtain ⟨x, hx, hx'⟩ := hz
rw [← hx', ← ofReal_inv, ofReal_pos]
exact inv_pos_of_pos hx
protected lemma inv_pos : 0 < z⁻¹ ↔ 0 < z := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => RCLike.inv_pos_of_pos h⟩
rw [← inv_inv z]
exact RCLike.inv_pos_of_pos h
/-- With `z ≤ w` iff `w - z` is real and nonnegative, `ℝ` and `ℂ` are star ordered rings.
(That is, a star ring in which the nonnegative elements are those of the form `star z * z`.)
Note this is only an instance with `open scoped ComplexOrder`. -/
lemma toStarOrderedRing : StarOrderedRing K :=
StarOrderedRing.of_nonneg_iff'
(h_add := fun {x y} hxy z => by
rw [RCLike.le_iff_re_im] at *
simpa [map_add, add_le_add_iff_left, add_right_inj] using hxy)
(h_nonneg_iff := fun x => by
rw [nonneg_iff]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨√(re x), by simp [ext_iff (K := K), h.1, h.2]⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨s, rfl⟩
simp [mul_comm, mul_self_nonneg, add_nonneg])
scoped[ComplexOrder] attribute [instance] RCLike.toStarOrderedRing
lemma toZeroLEOneClass : ZeroLEOneClass K where
zero_le_one := by simp [@RCLike.le_iff_re_im K]
scoped[ComplexOrder] attribute [instance] RCLike.toZeroLEOneClass
lemma toIsOrderedAddMonoid : IsOrderedAddMonoid K where
add_le_add_left _ _ := add_le_add_left
scoped[ComplexOrder] attribute [instance] RCLike.toIsOrderedAddMonoid
/-- With `z ≤ w` iff `w - z` is real and nonnegative, `ℝ` and `ℂ` are strictly ordered rings.
Note this is only an instance with `open scoped ComplexOrder`. -/
lemma toIsStrictOrderedRing : IsStrictOrderedRing K :=
.of_mul_pos fun z w hz hw ↦ by
rw [lt_iff_re_im, map_zero] at hz hw ⊢
simp [mul_re, mul_im, ← hz.2, ← hw.2, mul_pos hz.1 hw.1]
scoped[ComplexOrder] attribute [instance] RCLike.toIsStrictOrderedRing
theorem toOrderedSMul : OrderedSMul ℝ K :=
OrderedSMul.mk' fun a b r hab hr => by
replace hab := hab.le
rw [RCLike.le_iff_re_im] at hab
rw [RCLike.le_iff_re_im, smul_re, smul_re, smul_im, smul_im]
exact hab.imp (fun h => mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left h hr.le) (congr_arg _)
scoped[ComplexOrder] attribute [instance] RCLike.toOrderedSMul
/-- A star algebra over `K` has a scalar multiplication that respects the order. -/
lemma _root_.StarModule.instOrderedSMul {A : Type*} [NonUnitalRing A] [StarRing A] [PartialOrder A]
[StarOrderedRing A] [Module K A] [StarModule K A] [IsScalarTower K A A] [SMulCommClass K A A] :
OrderedSMul K A where
smul_lt_smul_of_pos {_ _ _} hxy hc := StarModule.smul_lt_smul_of_pos hxy hc
lt_of_smul_lt_smul_of_pos {x y c} hxy hc := by
have : c⁻¹ • c • x < c⁻¹ • c • y :=
StarModule.smul_lt_smul_of_pos hxy (RCLike.inv_pos_of_pos hc)
simpa [smul_smul, inv_mul_cancel₀ hc.ne'] using this
instance {A : Type*} [NonUnitalRing A] [StarRing A] [PartialOrder A] [StarOrderedRing A]
[Module ℝ A] [StarModule ℝ A] [IsScalarTower ℝ A A] [SMulCommClass ℝ A A] :
OrderedSMul ℝ A :=
StarModule.instOrderedSMul
scoped[ComplexOrder] attribute [instance] StarModule.instOrderedSMul
theorem ofReal_mul_pos_iff (x : ℝ) (z : K) :
0 < x * z ↔ (x < 0 ∧ z < 0) ∨ (0 < x ∧ 0 < z) := by
simp only [pos_iff (K := K), neg_iff (K := K), re_ofReal_mul, im_ofReal_mul]
obtain hx | hx | hx := lt_trichotomy x 0
· simp only [mul_pos_iff, not_lt_of_gt hx, false_and, hx, true_and, false_or, mul_eq_zero, hx.ne,
or_false]
· simp only [hx, zero_mul, lt_self_iff_false, false_and, false_or]
· simp only [mul_pos_iff, hx, true_and, not_lt_of_gt hx, false_and, or_false, mul_eq_zero,
hx.ne', false_or]
theorem ofReal_mul_neg_iff (x : ℝ) (z : K) :
x * z < 0 ↔ (x < 0 ∧ 0 < z) ∨ (0 < x ∧ z < 0) := by
simpa only [mul_neg, neg_pos, neg_neg_iff_pos] using ofReal_mul_pos_iff x (-z)
|
lemma instPosMulReflectLE : PosMulReflectLE K where
elim a b c h := by
| Mathlib/Analysis/RCLike/Basic.lean | 898 | 900 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.RingDivision
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Lemmas
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Coprime.Lemmas
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.FractionRing
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Order
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
We define the multiset of roots of a polynomial, and prove basic results about it.
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.roots p`: The multiset containing all the roots of `p`, including their
multiplicities.
* `Polynomial.rootSet p E`: The set of distinct roots of `p` in an algebra `E`.
## Main statements
* `Polynomial.C_leadingCoeff_mul_prod_multiset_X_sub_C`: If a polynomial has as many roots as its
degree, it can be written as the product of its leading coefficient with `∏ (X - a)` where `a`
ranges through its roots.
-/
assert_not_exists Ideal
open Multiset Finset
noncomputable section
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w z
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] {p q : R[X]}
section Roots
/-- `roots p` noncomputably gives a multiset containing all the roots of `p`,
including their multiplicities. -/
noncomputable def roots (p : R[X]) : Multiset R :=
haveI := Classical.decEq R
haveI := Classical.dec (p = 0)
if h : p = 0 then ∅ else Classical.choose (exists_multiset_roots h)
theorem roots_def [DecidableEq R] (p : R[X]) [Decidable (p = 0)] :
p.roots = if h : p = 0 then ∅ else Classical.choose (exists_multiset_roots h) := by
rename_i iR ip0
obtain rfl := Subsingleton.elim iR (Classical.decEq R)
obtain rfl := Subsingleton.elim ip0 (Classical.dec (p = 0))
rfl
@[simp]
theorem roots_zero : (0 : R[X]).roots = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
theorem card_roots (hp0 : p ≠ 0) : (Multiset.card (roots p) : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree p := by
classical
unfold roots
rw [dif_neg hp0]
exact (Classical.choose_spec (exists_multiset_roots hp0)).1
theorem card_roots' (p : R[X]) : Multiset.card p.roots ≤ natDegree p := by
by_cases hp0 : p = 0
· simp [hp0]
exact WithBot.coe_le_coe.1 (le_trans (card_roots hp0) (le_of_eq <| degree_eq_natDegree hp0))
theorem card_roots_sub_C {p : R[X]} {a : R} (hp0 : 0 < degree p) :
(Multiset.card (p - C a).roots : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree p :=
calc
(Multiset.card (p - C a).roots : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree (p - C a) :=
card_roots <| mt sub_eq_zero.1 fun h => not_le_of_gt hp0 <| h.symm ▸ degree_C_le
_ = degree p := by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← C_neg]; exact degree_add_C hp0
theorem card_roots_sub_C' {p : R[X]} {a : R} (hp0 : 0 < degree p) :
Multiset.card (p - C a).roots ≤ natDegree p :=
WithBot.coe_le_coe.1
(le_trans (card_roots_sub_C hp0)
(le_of_eq <| degree_eq_natDegree fun h => by simp_all [lt_irrefl]))
@[simp]
theorem count_roots [DecidableEq R] (p : R[X]) : p.roots.count a = rootMultiplicity a p := by
classical
by_cases hp : p = 0
· simp [hp]
rw [roots_def, dif_neg hp]
exact (Classical.choose_spec (exists_multiset_roots hp)).2 a
@[simp]
theorem mem_roots' : a ∈ p.roots ↔ p ≠ 0 ∧ IsRoot p a := by
classical
rw [← count_pos, count_roots p, rootMultiplicity_pos']
theorem mem_roots (hp : p ≠ 0) : a ∈ p.roots ↔ IsRoot p a :=
mem_roots'.trans <| and_iff_right hp
theorem ne_zero_of_mem_roots (h : a ∈ p.roots) : p ≠ 0 :=
(mem_roots'.1 h).1
theorem isRoot_of_mem_roots (h : a ∈ p.roots) : IsRoot p a :=
(mem_roots'.1 h).2
theorem mem_roots_map_of_injective [Semiring S] {p : S[X]} {f : S →+* R}
(hf : Function.Injective f) {x : R} (hp : p ≠ 0) : x ∈ (p.map f).roots ↔ p.eval₂ f x = 0 := by
rw [mem_roots ((Polynomial.map_ne_zero_iff hf).mpr hp), IsRoot, eval_map]
lemma mem_roots_iff_aeval_eq_zero {x : R} (w : p ≠ 0) : x ∈ roots p ↔ aeval x p = 0 := by
rw [aeval_def, ← mem_roots_map_of_injective (FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective _ _) w,
Algebra.id.map_eq_id, map_id]
theorem card_le_degree_of_subset_roots {p : R[X]} {Z : Finset R} (h : Z.val ⊆ p.roots) :
#Z ≤ p.natDegree :=
(Multiset.card_le_card (Finset.val_le_iff_val_subset.2 h)).trans (Polynomial.card_roots' p)
theorem finite_setOf_isRoot {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) : Set.Finite { x | IsRoot p x } := by
classical
simpa only [← Finset.setOf_mem, Multiset.mem_toFinset, mem_roots hp]
using p.roots.toFinset.finite_toSet
theorem eq_zero_of_infinite_isRoot (p : R[X]) (h : Set.Infinite { x | IsRoot p x }) : p = 0 :=
not_imp_comm.mp finite_setOf_isRoot h
theorem exists_max_root [LinearOrder R] (p : R[X]) (hp : p ≠ 0) : ∃ x₀, ∀ x, p.IsRoot x → x ≤ x₀ :=
Set.exists_upper_bound_image _ _ <| finite_setOf_isRoot hp
theorem exists_min_root [LinearOrder R] (p : R[X]) (hp : p ≠ 0) : ∃ x₀, ∀ x, p.IsRoot x → x₀ ≤ x :=
Set.exists_lower_bound_image _ _ <| finite_setOf_isRoot hp
theorem eq_of_infinite_eval_eq (p q : R[X]) (h : Set.Infinite { x | eval x p = eval x q }) :
p = q := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
apply eq_zero_of_infinite_isRoot
simpa only [IsRoot, eval_sub, sub_eq_zero]
theorem roots_mul {p q : R[X]} (hpq : p * q ≠ 0) : (p * q).roots = p.roots + q.roots := by
classical
exact Multiset.ext.mpr fun r => by
rw [count_add, count_roots, count_roots, count_roots, rootMultiplicity_mul hpq]
theorem roots.le_of_dvd (h : q ≠ 0) : p ∣ q → roots p ≤ roots q := by
rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
exact Multiset.le_iff_exists_add.mpr ⟨k.roots, roots_mul h⟩
theorem mem_roots_sub_C' {p : R[X]} {a x : R} : x ∈ (p - C a).roots ↔ p ≠ C a ∧ p.eval x = a := by
rw [mem_roots', IsRoot.def, sub_ne_zero, eval_sub, sub_eq_zero, eval_C]
theorem mem_roots_sub_C {p : R[X]} {a x : R} (hp0 : 0 < degree p) :
x ∈ (p - C a).roots ↔ p.eval x = a :=
mem_roots_sub_C'.trans <| and_iff_right fun hp => hp0.not_le <| hp.symm ▸ degree_C_le
@[simp]
theorem roots_X_sub_C (r : R) : roots (X - C r) = {r} := by
classical
ext s
rw [count_roots, rootMultiplicity_X_sub_C, count_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem roots_X_add_C (r : R) : roots (X + C r) = {-r} := by simpa using roots_X_sub_C (-r)
@[simp]
theorem roots_X : roots (X : R[X]) = {0} := by rw [← roots_X_sub_C, C_0, sub_zero]
@[simp]
theorem roots_C (x : R) : (C x).roots = 0 := by
classical exact
if H : x = 0 then by rw [H, C_0, roots_zero]
else
Multiset.ext.mpr fun r => (by
rw [count_roots, count_zero, rootMultiplicity_eq_zero (not_isRoot_C _ _ H)])
@[simp]
theorem roots_one : (1 : R[X]).roots = ∅ :=
roots_C 1
@[simp]
theorem roots_C_mul (p : R[X]) (ha : a ≠ 0) : (C a * p).roots = p.roots := by
by_cases hp : p = 0 <;>
simp only [roots_mul, *, Ne, mul_eq_zero, C_eq_zero, or_self_iff, not_false_iff, roots_C,
zero_add, mul_zero]
@[simp]
theorem roots_smul_nonzero (p : R[X]) (ha : a ≠ 0) : (a • p).roots = p.roots := by
rw [smul_eq_C_mul, roots_C_mul _ ha]
@[simp]
lemma roots_neg (p : R[X]) : (-p).roots = p.roots := by
rw [← neg_one_smul R p, roots_smul_nonzero p (neg_ne_zero.mpr one_ne_zero)]
@[simp]
theorem roots_C_mul_X_sub_C_of_IsUnit (b : R) (a : Rˣ) : (C (a : R) * X - C b).roots =
{a⁻¹ * b} := by
rw [← roots_C_mul _ (Units.ne_zero a⁻¹), mul_sub, ← mul_assoc, ← C_mul, ← C_mul,
Units.inv_mul, C_1, one_mul]
exact roots_X_sub_C (a⁻¹ * b)
@[simp]
theorem roots_C_mul_X_add_C_of_IsUnit (b : R) (a : Rˣ) : (C (a : R) * X + C b).roots =
{-(a⁻¹ * b)} := by
rw [← sub_neg_eq_add, ← C_neg, roots_C_mul_X_sub_C_of_IsUnit, mul_neg]
theorem roots_list_prod (L : List R[X]) :
(0 : R[X]) ∉ L → L.prod.roots = (L : Multiset R[X]).bind roots :=
List.recOn L (fun _ => roots_one) fun hd tl ih H => by
rw [List.mem_cons, not_or] at H
rw [List.prod_cons, roots_mul (mul_ne_zero (Ne.symm H.1) <| List.prod_ne_zero H.2), ←
Multiset.cons_coe, Multiset.cons_bind, ih H.2]
theorem roots_multiset_prod (m : Multiset R[X]) : (0 : R[X]) ∉ m → m.prod.roots = m.bind roots := by
rcases m with ⟨L⟩
simpa only [Multiset.prod_coe, quot_mk_to_coe''] using roots_list_prod L
theorem roots_prod {ι : Type*} (f : ι → R[X]) (s : Finset ι) :
s.prod f ≠ 0 → (s.prod f).roots = s.val.bind fun i => roots (f i) := by
rcases s with ⟨m, hm⟩
simpa [Multiset.prod_eq_zero_iff, Multiset.bind_map] using roots_multiset_prod (m.map f)
@[simp]
theorem roots_pow (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : (p ^ n).roots = n • p.roots := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [pow_zero, roots_one, zero_smul, empty_eq_zero]
| succ n ihn =>
rcases eq_or_ne p 0 with (rfl | hp)
· rw [zero_pow n.succ_ne_zero, roots_zero, smul_zero]
· rw [pow_succ, roots_mul (mul_ne_zero (pow_ne_zero _ hp) hp), ihn, add_smul, one_smul]
theorem roots_X_pow (n : ℕ) : (X ^ n : R[X]).roots = n • ({0} : Multiset R) := by
rw [roots_pow, roots_X]
theorem roots_C_mul_X_pow (ha : a ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) :
| Polynomial.roots (C a * X ^ n) = n • ({0} : Multiset R) := by
rw [roots_C_mul _ ha, roots_X_pow]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Roots.lean | 241 | 244 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Quaternion
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
/-!
# Basis on a quaternion-like algebra
## Main definitions
* `QuaternionAlgebra.Basis A c₁ c₂ c₃`: a basis for a subspace of an `R`-algebra `A` that has the
same algebra structure as `ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]`.
* `QuaternionAlgebra.Basis.self R`: the canonical basis for `ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]`.
* `QuaternionAlgebra.Basis.compHom b f`: transform a basis `b` by an AlgHom `f`.
* `QuaternionAlgebra.lift`: Define an `AlgHom` out of `ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]` by its action on the basis
elements `i`, `j`, and `k`. In essence, this is a universal property. Analogous to `Complex.lift`,
but takes a bundled `QuaternionAlgebra.Basis` instead of just a `Subtype` as the amount of
data / proves is non-negligible.
-/
open Quaternion
namespace QuaternionAlgebra
/-- A quaternion basis contains the information both sufficient and necessary to construct an
`R`-algebra homomorphism from `ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]` to `A`; or equivalently, a surjective
`R`-algebra homomorphism from `ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]` to an `R`-subalgebra of `A`.
Note that for definitional convenience, `k` is provided as a field even though `i_mul_j` fully
determines it. -/
structure Basis {R : Type*} (A : Type*) [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A] (c₁ c₂ c₃ : R) where
/-- The first imaginary unit -/
i : A
/-- The second imaginary unit -/
j : A
/-- The third imaginary unit -/
k : A
i_mul_i : i * i = c₁ • (1 : A) + c₂ • i
j_mul_j : j * j = c₃ • (1 : A)
i_mul_j : i * j = k
j_mul_i : j * i = c₂ • j - k
variable {R : Type*} {A B : Type*} [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Ring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
variable {c₁ c₂ c₃ : R}
namespace Basis
/-- Since `k` is redundant, it is not necessary to show `q₁.k = q₂.k` when showing `q₁ = q₂`. -/
@[ext]
protected theorem ext ⦃q₁ q₂ : Basis A c₁ c₂ c₃⦄ (hi : q₁.i = q₂.i)
(hj : q₁.j = q₂.j) : q₁ = q₂ := by
cases q₁; rename_i q₁_i_mul_j _
cases q₂; rename_i q₂_i_mul_j _
congr
rw [← q₁_i_mul_j, ← q₂_i_mul_j]
congr
variable (R) in
/-- There is a natural quaternionic basis for the `QuaternionAlgebra`. -/
@[simps i j k]
protected def self : Basis ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] c₁ c₂ c₃ where
i := ⟨0, 1, 0, 0⟩
i_mul_i := by ext <;> simp
j := ⟨0, 0, 1, 0⟩
j_mul_j := by ext <;> simp
k := ⟨0, 0, 0, 1⟩
i_mul_j := by ext <;> simp
j_mul_i := by ext <;> simp
instance : Inhabited (Basis ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] c₁ c₂ c₃) :=
⟨Basis.self R⟩
variable (q : Basis A c₁ c₂ c₃)
attribute [simp] i_mul_i j_mul_j i_mul_j j_mul_i
@[simp]
theorem i_mul_k : q.i * q.k = c₁ • q.j + c₂ • q.k := by
rw [← i_mul_j, ← mul_assoc, i_mul_i, add_mul, smul_mul_assoc, one_mul, smul_mul_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem k_mul_i : q.k * q.i = -c₁ • q.j := by
rw [← i_mul_j, mul_assoc, j_mul_i, mul_sub, i_mul_k, neg_smul, mul_smul_comm, i_mul_j]
linear_combination (norm := module)
@[simp]
theorem k_mul_j : q.k * q.j = c₃ • q.i := by
rw [← i_mul_j, mul_assoc, j_mul_j, mul_smul_comm, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem j_mul_k : q.j * q.k = (c₂ * c₃) • 1 - c₃ • q.i := by
rw [← i_mul_j, ← mul_assoc, j_mul_i, sub_mul, smul_mul_assoc, j_mul_j, ← smul_assoc, k_mul_j]
rfl
| @[simp]
theorem k_mul_k : q.k * q.k = -((c₁ * c₃) • (1 : A)) := by
| Mathlib/Algebra/QuaternionBasis.lean | 99 | 100 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Mario Carneiro, Sean Leather
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Card
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Union
/-!
# Finite sets in `Option α`
In this file we define
* `Option.toFinset`: construct an empty or singleton `Finset α` from an `Option α`;
* `Finset.insertNone`: given `s : Finset α`, lift it to a finset on `Option α` using `Option.some`
and then insert `Option.none`;
* `Finset.eraseNone`: given `s : Finset (Option α)`, returns `t : Finset α` such that
`x ∈ t ↔ some x ∈ s`.
Then we prove some basic lemmas about these definitions.
## Tags
finset, option
-/
variable {α β : Type*}
open Function
namespace Option
/-- Construct an empty or singleton finset from an `Option` -/
def toFinset (o : Option α) : Finset α :=
o.elim ∅ singleton
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_none : none.toFinset = (∅ : Finset α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_some {a : α} : (some a).toFinset = {a} :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_toFinset {a : α} {o : Option α} : a ∈ o.toFinset ↔ a ∈ o := by
cases o <;> simp [eq_comm]
theorem card_toFinset (o : Option α) : o.toFinset.card = o.elim 0 1 := by cases o <;> rfl
|
end Option
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Option.lean | 51 | 52 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Sqrt
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Sqrt
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Algebraic.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
/-!
# Irrational real numbers
In this file we define a predicate `Irrational` on `ℝ`, prove that the `n`-th root of an integer
number is irrational if it is not integer, and that `√(q : ℚ)` is irrational if and only if
`¬IsSquare q ∧ 0 ≤ q`.
We also provide dot-style constructors like `Irrational.add_rat`, `Irrational.rat_sub` etc.
With the `Decidable` instances in this file, is possible to prove `Irrational √n` using `decide`,
when `n` is a numeric literal or cast;
but this only works if you `unseal Nat.sqrt.iter in` before the theorem where you use this proof.
-/
open Rat Real
/-- A real number is irrational if it is not equal to any rational number. -/
def Irrational (x : ℝ) :=
x ∉ Set.range ((↑) : ℚ → ℝ)
theorem irrational_iff_ne_rational (x : ℝ) : Irrational x ↔ ∀ a b : ℤ, x ≠ a / b := by
simp only [Irrational, Rat.forall, cast_mk, not_exists, Set.mem_range, cast_intCast, cast_div,
eq_comm]
/-- A transcendental real number is irrational. -/
theorem Transcendental.irrational {r : ℝ} (tr : Transcendental ℚ r) : Irrational r := by
rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩
exact tr (isAlgebraic_algebraMap a)
/-!
### Irrationality of roots of integer and rational numbers
-/
/-- If `x^n`, `n > 0`, is integer and is not the `n`-th power of an integer, then
`x` is irrational. -/
theorem irrational_nrt_of_notint_nrt {x : ℝ} (n : ℕ) (m : ℤ) (hxr : x ^ n = m)
(hv : ¬∃ y : ℤ, x = y) (hnpos : 0 < n) : Irrational x := by
rintro ⟨⟨N, D, P, C⟩, rfl⟩
rw [← cast_pow] at hxr
have c1 : ((D : ℤ) : ℝ) ≠ 0 := by
rw [Int.cast_ne_zero, Int.natCast_ne_zero]
exact P
have c2 : ((D : ℤ) : ℝ) ^ n ≠ 0 := pow_ne_zero _ c1
rw [mk'_eq_divInt, cast_pow, cast_mk, div_pow, div_eq_iff_mul_eq c2, ← Int.cast_pow,
← Int.cast_pow, ← Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_inj] at hxr
have hdivn : (D : ℤ) ^ n ∣ N ^ n := Dvd.intro_left m hxr
rw [← Int.dvd_natAbs, ← Int.natCast_pow, Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, Int.natAbs_pow,
Nat.pow_dvd_pow_iff hnpos.ne'] at hdivn
obtain rfl : D = 1 := by rw [← Nat.gcd_eq_right hdivn, C.gcd_eq_one]
refine hv ⟨N, ?_⟩
rw [mk'_eq_divInt, Int.ofNat_one, divInt_one, cast_intCast]
/-- If `x^n = m` is an integer and `n` does not divide the `multiplicity p m`, then `x`
is irrational. -/
theorem irrational_nrt_of_n_not_dvd_multiplicity {x : ℝ} (n : ℕ) {m : ℤ} (hm : m ≠ 0) (p : ℕ)
[hp : Fact p.Prime] (hxr : x ^ n = m)
(hv : multiplicity (p : ℤ) m % n ≠ 0) :
Irrational x := by
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos n with (rfl | hnpos)
· rw [eq_comm, pow_zero, ← Int.cast_one, Int.cast_inj] at hxr
simp [hxr, multiplicity_of_one_right (mt isUnit_iff_dvd_one.1
(mt Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.1 hp.1.not_dvd_one)), Nat.zero_mod] at hv
refine irrational_nrt_of_notint_nrt _ _ hxr ?_ hnpos
rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
rw [← Int.cast_pow, Int.cast_inj] at hxr
subst m
have : y ≠ 0 := by rintro rfl; rw [zero_pow hnpos.ne'] at hm; exact hm rfl
rw [(Int.finiteMultiplicity_iff.2 ⟨by simp [hp.1.ne_one], this⟩).multiplicity_pow
(Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.1), Nat.mul_mod_right] at hv
exact hv rfl
theorem irrational_sqrt_of_multiplicity_odd (m : ℤ) (hm : 0 < m) (p : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime]
(Hpv : multiplicity (p : ℤ) m % 2 = 1) :
Irrational (√m) :=
@irrational_nrt_of_n_not_dvd_multiplicity _ 2 _ (Ne.symm (ne_of_lt hm)) p hp
(sq_sqrt (Int.cast_nonneg.2 <| le_of_lt hm)) (by rw [Hpv]; exact one_ne_zero)
@[simp] theorem not_irrational_zero : ¬Irrational 0 := not_not_intro ⟨0, Rat.cast_zero⟩
@[simp] theorem not_irrational_one : ¬Irrational 1 := not_not_intro ⟨1, Rat.cast_one⟩
theorem irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff_of_nonneg {q : ℚ} (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
Irrational (√q) ↔ ¬IsSquare q := by
refine Iff.not (?_ : Exists _ ↔ Exists _)
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
refine ⟨y, Rat.cast_injective (α := ℝ) ?_⟩
rw [Rat.cast_mul, hy, mul_self_sqrt (Rat.cast_nonneg.2 hq)]
· rintro ⟨q', rfl⟩
exact ⟨|q'|, mod_cast (sqrt_mul_self_eq_abs q').symm⟩
theorem irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff {q : ℚ} :
Irrational (√q) ↔ ¬IsSquare q ∧ 0 ≤ q := by
obtain hq | hq := le_or_lt 0 q
· simp_rw [irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff_of_nonneg hq, and_iff_left hq]
· rw [sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos (Rat.cast_nonpos.2 hq.le)]
simp_rw [not_irrational_zero, false_iff, not_and, not_le, hq, implies_true]
theorem irrational_sqrt_intCast_iff_of_nonneg {z : ℤ} (hz : 0 ≤ z) :
Irrational (√z) ↔ ¬IsSquare z := by
rw [← Rat.isSquare_intCast_iff, ← irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff_of_nonneg (mod_cast hz),
Rat.cast_intCast]
theorem irrational_sqrt_intCast_iff {z : ℤ} :
Irrational (√z) ↔ ¬IsSquare z ∧ 0 ≤ z := by
rw [← Rat.cast_intCast, irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff, Rat.isSquare_intCast_iff, Int.cast_nonneg]
theorem irrational_sqrt_natCast_iff {n : ℕ} : Irrational (√n) ↔ ¬IsSquare n := by
rw [← Rat.isSquare_natCast_iff, ← irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg,
Rat.cast_natCast]
theorem irrational_sqrt_ofNat_iff {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
Irrational √(ofNat(n)) ↔ ¬IsSquare ofNat(n) :=
irrational_sqrt_natCast_iff
| theorem Nat.Prime.irrational_sqrt {p : ℕ} (hp : Nat.Prime p) : Irrational (√p) :=
irrational_sqrt_natCast_iff.mpr hp.not_isSquare
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Irrational.lean | 129 | 131 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Pointwise.Set
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.AtTopBot.CompleteLattice
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.AtTopBot.Group
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Basic
/-!
# Neighborhoods to the left and to the right on an `OrderTopology`
We've seen some properties of left and right neighborhood of a point in an `OrderClosedTopology`.
In an `OrderTopology`, such neighborhoods can be characterized as the sets containing suitable
intervals to the right or to the left of `a`. We give now these characterizations. -/
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Topology Function
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
variable {α β γ : Type*}
section LinearOrder
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α]
section OrderTopology
variable [OrderTopology α]
open List in
/-- The following statements are equivalent:
0. `s` is a neighborhood of `a` within `(a, +∞)`;
1. `s` is a neighborhood of `a` within `(a, b]`;
2. `s` is a neighborhood of `a` within `(a, b)`;
3. `s` includes `(a, u)` for some `u ∈ (a, b]`;
4. `s` includes `(a, u)` for some `u > a`.
-/
theorem TFAE_mem_nhdsGT {a b : α} (hab : a < b) (s : Set α) :
TFAE [s ∈ 𝓝[>] a,
s ∈ 𝓝[Ioc a b] a,
s ∈ 𝓝[Ioo a b] a,
∃ u ∈ Ioc a b, Ioo a u ⊆ s,
∃ u ∈ Ioi a, Ioo a u ⊆ s] := by
tfae_have 1 ↔ 2 := by
rw [nhdsWithin_Ioc_eq_nhdsGT hab]
tfae_have 1 ↔ 3 := by
rw [nhdsWithin_Ioo_eq_nhdsGT hab]
tfae_have 4 → 5 := fun ⟨u, umem, hu⟩ => ⟨u, umem.1, hu⟩
tfae_have 5 → 1
| ⟨u, hau, hu⟩ => mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhdsGT hau) hu
tfae_have 1 → 4
| h => by
rcases mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.1 h with ⟨v, va, hv⟩
rcases exists_Ico_subset_of_mem_nhds' va hab with ⟨u, au, hu⟩
exact ⟨u, au, fun x hx => hv ⟨hu ⟨le_of_lt hx.1, hx.2⟩, hx.1⟩⟩
tfae_finish
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias TFAE_mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi := TFAE_mem_nhdsGT
theorem mem_nhdsGT_iff_exists_mem_Ioc_Ioo_subset {a u' : α} {s : Set α} (hu' : a < u') :
s ∈ 𝓝[>] a ↔ ∃ u ∈ Ioc a u', Ioo a u ⊆ s :=
(TFAE_mem_nhdsGT hu' s).out 0 3
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi_iff_exists_mem_Ioc_Ioo_subset := mem_nhdsGT_iff_exists_mem_Ioc_Ioo_subset
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `(a, +∞)` if and only if it contains an interval `(a, u)`
with `a < u < u'`, provided `a` is not a top element. -/
theorem mem_nhdsGT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset' {a u' : α} {s : Set α} (hu' : a < u') :
s ∈ 𝓝[>] a ↔ ∃ u ∈ Ioi a, Ioo a u ⊆ s :=
(TFAE_mem_nhdsGT hu' s).out 0 4
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi_iff_exists_Ioo_subset' := mem_nhdsGT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset'
theorem nhdsGT_basis_of_exists_gt {a : α} (h : ∃ b, a < b) : (𝓝[>] a).HasBasis (a < ·) (Ioo a) :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := h
⟨fun _ => mem_nhdsGT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset' h⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias nhdsWithin_Ioi_basis' := nhdsGT_basis_of_exists_gt
lemma nhdsGT_basis [NoMaxOrder α] (a : α) : (𝓝[>] a).HasBasis (a < ·) (Ioo a) :=
nhdsGT_basis_of_exists_gt <| exists_gt a
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias nhdsWithin_Ioi_basis := nhdsGT_basis
theorem nhdsGT_eq_bot_iff {a : α} : 𝓝[>] a = ⊥ ↔ IsTop a ∨ ∃ b, a ⋖ b := by
by_cases ha : IsTop a
· simp [ha, ha.isMax.Ioi_eq]
· simp only [ha, false_or]
rw [isTop_iff_isMax, not_isMax_iff] at ha
simp only [(nhdsGT_basis_of_exists_gt ha).eq_bot_iff, covBy_iff_Ioo_eq]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias nhdsWithin_Ioi_eq_bot_iff := nhdsGT_eq_bot_iff
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `(a, +∞)` if and only if it contains an interval `(a, u)`
with `a < u`. -/
theorem mem_nhdsGT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset [NoMaxOrder α] {a : α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ 𝓝[>] a ↔ ∃ u ∈ Ioi a, Ioo a u ⊆ s :=
let ⟨_u', hu'⟩ := exists_gt a
mem_nhdsGT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset' hu'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi_iff_exists_Ioo_subset := mem_nhdsGT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset
/-- The set of points which are isolated on the right is countable when the space is
second-countable. -/
theorem countable_setOf_isolated_right [SecondCountableTopology α] :
{ x : α | 𝓝[>] x = ⊥ }.Countable := by
simp only [nhdsGT_eq_bot_iff, setOf_or]
exact (subsingleton_isTop α).countable.union countable_setOf_covBy_right
/-- The set of points which are isolated on the left is countable when the space is
second-countable. -/
theorem countable_setOf_isolated_left [SecondCountableTopology α] :
{ x : α | 𝓝[<] x = ⊥ }.Countable :=
countable_setOf_isolated_right (α := αᵒᵈ)
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `(a, +∞)` if and only if it contains an interval `(a, u]`
with `a < u`. -/
theorem mem_nhdsGT_iff_exists_Ioc_subset [NoMaxOrder α] [DenselyOrdered α] {a : α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ 𝓝[>] a ↔ ∃ u ∈ Ioi a, Ioc a u ⊆ s := by
rw [mem_nhdsGT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset]
constructor
· rintro ⟨u, au, as⟩
rcases exists_between au with ⟨v, hv⟩
exact ⟨v, hv.1, fun x hx => as ⟨hx.1, lt_of_le_of_lt hx.2 hv.2⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨u, au, as⟩
exact ⟨u, au, Subset.trans Ioo_subset_Ioc_self as⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi_iff_exists_Ioc_subset := mem_nhdsGT_iff_exists_Ioc_subset
open List in
/-- The following statements are equivalent:
0. `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `(-∞, b)`
1. `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `[a, b)`
2. `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `(a, b)`
3. `s` includes `(l, b)` for some `l ∈ [a, b)`
4. `s` includes `(l, b)` for some `l < b` -/
theorem TFAE_mem_nhdsLT {a b : α} (h : a < b) (s : Set α) :
TFAE [s ∈ 𝓝[<] b,-- 0 : `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `(-∞, b)`
s ∈ 𝓝[Ico a b] b,-- 1 : `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `[a, b)`
s ∈ 𝓝[Ioo a b] b,-- 2 : `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `(a, b)`
∃ l ∈ Ico a b, Ioo l b ⊆ s,-- 3 : `s` includes `(l, b)` for some `l ∈ [a, b)`
∃ l ∈ Iio b, Ioo l b ⊆ s] := by-- 4 : `s` includes `(l, b)` for some `l < b`
simpa using TFAE_mem_nhdsGT h.dual (ofDual ⁻¹' s)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias TFAE_mem_nhdsWithin_Iio := TFAE_mem_nhdsLT
theorem mem_nhdsLT_iff_exists_mem_Ico_Ioo_subset {a l' : α} {s : Set α} (hl' : l' < a) :
s ∈ 𝓝[<] a ↔ ∃ l ∈ Ico l' a, Ioo l a ⊆ s :=
(TFAE_mem_nhdsLT hl' s).out 0 3
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias mem_nhdsWithin_Iio_iff_exists_mem_Ico_Ioo_subset := mem_nhdsLT_iff_exists_mem_Ico_Ioo_subset
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `(-∞, a)` if and only if it contains an interval `(l, a)`
with `l < a`, provided `a` is not a bottom element. -/
theorem mem_nhdsLT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset' {a l' : α} {s : Set α} (hl' : l' < a) :
s ∈ 𝓝[<] a ↔ ∃ l ∈ Iio a, Ioo l a ⊆ s :=
(TFAE_mem_nhdsLT hl' s).out 0 4
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias mem_nhdsWithin_Iio_iff_exists_Ioo_subset' := mem_nhdsLT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset'
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `(-∞, a)` if and only if it contains an interval `(l, a)`
with `l < a`. -/
theorem mem_nhdsLT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset [NoMinOrder α] {a : α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ 𝓝[<] a ↔ ∃ l ∈ Iio a, Ioo l a ⊆ s :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := exists_lt a
mem_nhdsLT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset' h
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias mem_nhdsWithin_Iio_iff_exists_Ioo_subset := mem_nhdsLT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `(-∞, a)` if and only if it contains an interval `[l, a)`
with `l < a`. -/
theorem mem_nhdsLT_iff_exists_Ico_subset [NoMinOrder α] [DenselyOrdered α] {a : α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ 𝓝[<] a ↔ ∃ l ∈ Iio a, Ico l a ⊆ s := by
have : ofDual ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝[>] toDual a ↔ _ := mem_nhdsGT_iff_exists_Ioc_subset
simpa using this
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias mem_nhdsWithin_Iio_iff_exists_Ico_subset := mem_nhdsLT_iff_exists_Ico_subset
theorem nhdsLT_basis_of_exists_lt {a : α} (h : ∃ b, b < a) : (𝓝[<] a).HasBasis (· < a) (Ioo · a) :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := h
⟨fun _ => mem_nhdsLT_iff_exists_Ioo_subset' h⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias nhdsWithin_Iio_basis' := nhdsLT_basis_of_exists_lt
theorem nhdsLT_basis [NoMinOrder α] (a : α) : (𝓝[<] a).HasBasis (· < a) (Ioo · a) :=
nhdsLT_basis_of_exists_lt <| exists_lt a
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias nhdsWithin_Iio_basis := nhdsLT_basis
theorem nhdsLT_eq_bot_iff {a : α} : 𝓝[<] a = ⊥ ↔ IsBot a ∨ ∃ b, b ⋖ a := by
convert (config := { preTransparency := .default }) nhdsGT_eq_bot_iff (a := OrderDual.toDual a)
using 4
exact ofDual_covBy_ofDual_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias nhdsWithin_Iio_eq_bot_iff := nhdsLT_eq_bot_iff
open List in
/-- The following statements are equivalent:
0. `s` is a neighborhood of `a` within `[a, +∞)`;
1. `s` is a neighborhood of `a` within `[a, b]`;
2. `s` is a neighborhood of `a` within `[a, b)`;
3. `s` includes `[a, u)` for some `u ∈ (a, b]`;
4. `s` includes `[a, u)` for some `u > a`.
-/
theorem TFAE_mem_nhdsGE {a b : α} (hab : a < b) (s : Set α) :
TFAE [s ∈ 𝓝[≥] a,
s ∈ 𝓝[Icc a b] a,
s ∈ 𝓝[Ico a b] a,
∃ u ∈ Ioc a b, Ico a u ⊆ s,
∃ u ∈ Ioi a , Ico a u ⊆ s] := by
tfae_have 1 ↔ 2 := by
rw [nhdsWithin_Icc_eq_nhdsGE hab]
tfae_have 1 ↔ 3 := by
rw [nhdsWithin_Ico_eq_nhdsGE hab]
tfae_have 1 ↔ 5 := (nhdsGE_basis_of_exists_gt ⟨b, hab⟩).mem_iff
tfae_have 4 → 5 := fun ⟨u, umem, hu⟩ => ⟨u, umem.1, hu⟩
tfae_have 5 → 4
| ⟨u, hua, hus⟩ => ⟨min u b, ⟨lt_min hua hab, min_le_right _ _⟩,
(Ico_subset_Ico_right <| min_le_left _ _).trans hus⟩
tfae_finish
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias TFAE_mem_nhdsWithin_Ici := TFAE_mem_nhdsGE
theorem mem_nhdsGE_iff_exists_mem_Ioc_Ico_subset {a u' : α} {s : Set α} (hu' : a < u') :
s ∈ 𝓝[≥] a ↔ ∃ u ∈ Ioc a u', Ico a u ⊆ s :=
(TFAE_mem_nhdsGE hu' s).out 0 3 (by norm_num) (by norm_num)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias mem_nhdsWithin_Ici_iff_exists_mem_Ioc_Ico_subset := mem_nhdsGE_iff_exists_mem_Ioc_Ico_subset
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `[a, +∞)` if and only if it contains an interval `[a, u)`
with `a < u < u'`, provided `a` is not a top element. -/
theorem mem_nhdsGE_iff_exists_Ico_subset' {a u' : α} {s : Set α} (hu' : a < u') :
s ∈ 𝓝[≥] a ↔ ∃ u ∈ Ioi a, Ico a u ⊆ s :=
(TFAE_mem_nhdsGE hu' s).out 0 4 (by norm_num) (by norm_num)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias mem_nhdsWithin_Ici_iff_exists_Ico_subset' := mem_nhdsGE_iff_exists_Ico_subset'
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `[a, +∞)` if and only if it contains an interval `[a, u)`
with `a < u`. -/
theorem mem_nhdsGE_iff_exists_Ico_subset [NoMaxOrder α] {a : α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ 𝓝[≥] a ↔ ∃ u ∈ Ioi a, Ico a u ⊆ s :=
let ⟨_, hu'⟩ := exists_gt a
mem_nhdsGE_iff_exists_Ico_subset' hu'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias mem_nhdsWithin_Ici_iff_exists_Ico_subset := mem_nhdsGE_iff_exists_Ico_subset
theorem nhdsGE_basis_Ico [NoMaxOrder α] (a : α) : (𝓝[≥] a).HasBasis (fun u => a < u) (Ico a) :=
⟨fun _ => mem_nhdsGE_iff_exists_Ico_subset⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias nhdsWithin_Ici_basis_Ico := nhdsGE_basis_Ico
/-- The filter of right neighborhoods has a basis of closed intervals. -/
theorem nhdsGE_basis_Icc [NoMaxOrder α] [DenselyOrdered α] {a : α} :
(𝓝[≥] a).HasBasis (a < ·) (Icc a) :=
(nhdsGE_basis _).to_hasBasis
(fun _u hu ↦ (exists_between hu).imp fun _v hv ↦ hv.imp_right Icc_subset_Ico_right) fun u hu ↦
⟨u, hu, Ico_subset_Icc_self⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias nhdsWithin_Ici_basis_Icc := nhdsGE_basis_Icc
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `[a, +∞)` if and only if it contains an interval `[a, u]`
with `a < u`. -/
theorem mem_nhdsGE_iff_exists_Icc_subset [NoMaxOrder α] [DenselyOrdered α] {a : α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ 𝓝[≥] a ↔ ∃ u, a < u ∧ Icc a u ⊆ s :=
nhdsGE_basis_Icc.mem_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias mem_nhdsWithin_Ici_iff_exists_Icc_subset := mem_nhdsGE_iff_exists_Icc_subset
open List in
/-- The following statements are equivalent:
0. `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `(-∞, b]`
1. `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `[a, b]`
2. `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `(a, b]`
3. `s` includes `(l, b]` for some `l ∈ [a, b)`
4. `s` includes `(l, b]` for some `l < b` -/
theorem TFAE_mem_nhdsLE {a b : α} (h : a < b) (s : Set α) :
TFAE [s ∈ 𝓝[≤] b,-- 0 : `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `(-∞, b]`
s ∈ 𝓝[Icc a b] b,-- 1 : `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `[a, b]`
s ∈ 𝓝[Ioc a b] b,-- 2 : `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `(a, b]`
∃ l ∈ Ico a b, Ioc l b ⊆ s,-- 3 : `s` includes `(l, b]` for some `l ∈ [a, b)`
∃ l ∈ Iio b, Ioc l b ⊆ s] := by-- 4 : `s` includes `(l, b]` for some `l < b`
simpa using TFAE_mem_nhdsGE h.dual (ofDual ⁻¹' s)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias TFAE_mem_nhdsWithin_Iic := TFAE_mem_nhdsLE
theorem mem_nhdsLE_iff_exists_mem_Ico_Ioc_subset {a l' : α} {s : Set α} (hl' : l' < a) :
s ∈ 𝓝[≤] a ↔ ∃ l ∈ Ico l' a, Ioc l a ⊆ s :=
(TFAE_mem_nhdsLE hl' s).out 0 3 (by norm_num) (by norm_num)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias mem_nhdsWithin_Iic_iff_exists_mem_Ico_Ioc_subset := mem_nhdsLE_iff_exists_mem_Ico_Ioc_subset
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `(-∞, a]` if and only if it contains an interval `(l, a]`
with `l < a`, provided `a` is not a bottom element. -/
theorem mem_nhdsLE_iff_exists_Ioc_subset' {a l' : α} {s : Set α} (hl' : l' < a) :
s ∈ 𝓝[≤] a ↔ ∃ l ∈ Iio a, Ioc l a ⊆ s :=
(TFAE_mem_nhdsLE hl' s).out 0 4 (by norm_num) (by norm_num)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias mem_nhdsWithin_Iic_iff_exists_Ioc_subset' := mem_nhdsLE_iff_exists_Ioc_subset'
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `(-∞, a]` if and only if it contains an interval `(l, a]`
with `l < a`. -/
theorem mem_nhdsLE_iff_exists_Ioc_subset [NoMinOrder α] {a : α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ 𝓝[≤] a ↔ ∃ l ∈ Iio a, Ioc l a ⊆ s :=
let ⟨_, hl'⟩ := exists_lt a
mem_nhdsLE_iff_exists_Ioc_subset' hl'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias mem_nhdsWithin_Iic_iff_exists_Ioc_subset := mem_nhdsLE_iff_exists_Ioc_subset
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `(-∞, a]` if and only if it contains an interval `[l, a]`
with `l < a`. -/
theorem mem_nhdsLE_iff_exists_Icc_subset [NoMinOrder α] [DenselyOrdered α] {a : α}
{s : Set α} : s ∈ 𝓝[≤] a ↔ ∃ l, l < a ∧ Icc l a ⊆ s :=
calc s ∈ 𝓝[≤] a ↔ ofDual ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝[≥] (toDual a) := Iff.rfl
_ ↔ ∃ u : α, toDual a < toDual u ∧ Icc (toDual a) (toDual u) ⊆ ofDual ⁻¹' s :=
mem_nhdsGE_iff_exists_Icc_subset
_ ↔ ∃ l, l < a ∧ Icc l a ⊆ s := by simp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias mem_nhdsWithin_Iic_iff_exists_Icc_subset := mem_nhdsLE_iff_exists_Icc_subset
| /-- The filter of left neighborhoods has a basis of closed intervals. -/
theorem nhdsLE_basis_Icc [NoMinOrder α] [DenselyOrdered α] {a : α} :
(𝓝[≤] a).HasBasis (· < a) (Icc · a) :=
⟨fun _ ↦ mem_nhdsLE_iff_exists_Icc_subset⟩
| Mathlib/Topology/Order/LeftRightNhds.lean | 354 | 357 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Theodore Hwa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Kim Morrison, Violeta Hernández Palacios, Junyan Xu, Theodore Hwa
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Hydra
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Surreal.Basic
/-!
### Surreal multiplication
In this file, we show that multiplication of surreal numbers is well-defined, and thus the
surreal numbers form a linear ordered commutative ring.
An inductive argument proves the following three main theorems:
* P1: being numeric is closed under multiplication,
* P2: multiplying a numeric pregame by equivalent numeric pregames results in equivalent pregames,
* P3: the product of two positive numeric pregames is positive (`mul_pos`).
This is Theorem 8 in [Conway2001], or Theorem 3.8 in [SchleicherStoll]. P1 allows us to define
multiplication as an operation on numeric pregames, P2 says that this is well-defined as an
operation on the quotient by `PGame.Equiv`, namely the surreal numbers, and P3 is an axiom that
needs to be satisfied for the surreals to be a `OrderedRing`.
We follow the proof in [SchleicherStoll], except that we use the well-foundedness of
the hydra relation `CutExpand` on `Multiset PGame` instead of the argument based
on a depth function in the paper.
In the argument, P3 is stated with four variables `x₁`, `x₂`, `y₁`, `y₂` satisfying `x₁ < x₂` and
`y₁ < y₂`, and says that `x₁ * y₂ + x₂ * x₁ < x₁ * y₁ + x₂ * y₂`, which is equivalent to
`0 < x₂ - x₁ → 0 < y₂ - y₁ → 0 < (x₂ - x₁) * (y₂ - y₁)`, i.e.
`@mul_pos PGame _ (x₂ - x₁) (y₂ - y₁)`. It has to be stated in this form and not in terms of
`mul_pos` because we need to show P1, P2 and (a specialized form of) P3 simultaneously, and
for example `P1 x y` will be deduced from P3 with variables taking values simpler than `x` or `y`
(among other induction hypotheses), but if you subtract two pregames simpler than `x` or `y`,
the result may no longer be simpler.
The specialized version of P3 is called P4, which takes only three arguments `x₁`, `x₂`, `y` and
requires that `y₂ = y` or `-y` and that `y₁` is a left option of `y₂`. After P1, P2 and P4 are
shown, a further inductive argument (this time using the `GameAdd` relation) proves P3 in full.
Implementation strategy of the inductive argument: we
* extract specialized versions (`IH1`, `IH2`, `IH3`, `IH4` and `IH24`) of the induction hypothesis
that are easier to apply (taking `IsOption` arguments directly), and
* show they are invariant under certain symmetries (permutation and negation of arguments) and that
the induction hypothesis indeed implies the specialized versions.
* utilize the symmetries to minimize calculation.
The whole proof features a clear separation into lemmas of different roles:
* verification of symmetry properties of P and IH (`P3_comm`, `ih1_neg_left`, etc.),
* calculations that connect P1, P2, P3, and inequalities between the product of
two surreals and its options (`mulOption_lt_iff_P1`, etc.),
* specializations of the induction hypothesis
(`numeric_option_mul`, `ih1`, `ih1_swap`, `ih₁₂`, `ih4`, etc.),
* application of specialized induction hypothesis
(`P1_of_ih`, `mul_right_le_of_equiv`, `P3_of_lt`, etc.).
## References
* [Conway, *On numbers and games*][Conway2001]
* [Schleicher, Stoll, *An introduction to Conway's games and numbers*][SchleicherStoll]
-/
universe u
open SetTheory Game PGame WellFounded
namespace Surreal.Multiplication
/-- The nontrivial part of P1 in [SchleicherStoll] says that the left options of `x * y` are less
than the right options, and this is the general form of these statements. -/
def P1 (x₁ x₂ x₃ y₁ y₂ y₃ : PGame) :=
⟦x₁ * y₁⟧ + ⟦x₂ * y₂⟧ - ⟦x₁ * y₂⟧ < ⟦x₃ * y₁⟧ + ⟦x₂ * y₃⟧ - (⟦x₃ * y₃⟧ : Game)
/-- The proposition P2, without numericity assumptions. -/
def P2 (x₁ x₂ y : PGame) := x₁ ≈ x₂ → ⟦x₁ * y⟧ = (⟦x₂ * y⟧ : Game)
/-- The proposition P3, without the `x₁ < x₂` and `y₁ < y₂` assumptions. -/
def P3 (x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : PGame) := ⟦x₁ * y₂⟧ + ⟦x₂ * y₁⟧ < ⟦x₁ * y₁⟧ + (⟦x₂ * y₂⟧ : Game)
/-- The proposition P4, without numericity assumptions. In the references, the second part of the
conjunction is stated as `∀ j, P3 x₁ x₂ y (y.moveRight j)`, which is equivalent to our statement
by `P3_comm` and `P3_neg`. We choose to state everything in terms of left options for uniform
treatment. -/
def P4 (x₁ x₂ y : PGame) :=
x₁ < x₂ → (∀ i, P3 x₁ x₂ (y.moveLeft i) y) ∧ ∀ j, P3 x₁ x₂ ((-y).moveLeft j) (-y)
/-- The conjunction of P2 and P4. -/
def P24 (x₁ x₂ y : PGame) : Prop := P2 x₁ x₂ y ∧ P4 x₁ x₂ y
variable {x x₁ x₂ x₃ x' y y₁ y₂ y₃ y' : PGame.{u}}
/-! #### Symmetry properties of P1, P2, P3, and P4 -/
lemma P3_comm : P3 x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ ↔ P3 y₁ y₂ x₁ x₂ := by
rw [P3, P3, add_comm]
congr! 2 <;> rw [quot_mul_comm]
lemma P3.trans (h₁ : P3 x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) (h₂ : P3 x₂ x₃ y₁ y₂) : P3 x₁ x₃ y₁ y₂ := by
rw [P3] at h₁ h₂
rw [P3, ← add_lt_add_iff_left (⟦x₂ * y₁⟧ + ⟦x₂ * y₂⟧)]
convert add_lt_add h₁ h₂ using 1 <;> abel
lemma P3_neg : P3 x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ ↔ P3 (-x₂) (-x₁) y₁ y₂ := by
simp_rw [P3, quot_neg_mul]
rw [← _root_.neg_lt_neg_iff]
abel_nf
lemma P2_neg_left : P2 x₁ x₂ y ↔ P2 (-x₂) (-x₁) y := by
rw [P2, P2]
constructor
· rw [quot_neg_mul, quot_neg_mul, eq_comm, neg_inj, neg_equiv_neg_iff, PGame.equiv_comm]
exact (· ·)
· rw [PGame.equiv_comm, neg_equiv_neg_iff, quot_neg_mul, quot_neg_mul, neg_inj, eq_comm]
exact (· ·)
lemma P2_neg_right : P2 x₁ x₂ y ↔ P2 x₁ x₂ (-y) := by
rw [P2, P2, quot_mul_neg, quot_mul_neg, neg_inj]
lemma P4_neg_left : P4 x₁ x₂ y ↔ P4 (-x₂) (-x₁) y := by
simp_rw [P4, PGame.neg_lt_neg_iff, moveLeft_neg, ← P3_neg]
lemma P4_neg_right : P4 x₁ x₂ y ↔ P4 x₁ x₂ (-y) := by
rw [P4, P4, neg_neg, and_comm]
lemma P24_neg_left : P24 x₁ x₂ y ↔ P24 (-x₂) (-x₁) y := by rw [P24, P24, P2_neg_left, P4_neg_left]
lemma P24_neg_right : P24 x₁ x₂ y ↔ P24 x₁ x₂ (-y) := by rw [P24, P24, P2_neg_right, P4_neg_right]
/-! #### Explicit calculations necessary for the main proof -/
lemma mulOption_lt_iff_P1 {i j k l} :
(⟦mulOption x y i k⟧ : Game) < -⟦mulOption x (-y) j l⟧ ↔
P1 (x.moveLeft i) x (x.moveLeft j) y (y.moveLeft k) (-(-y).moveLeft l) := by
dsimp only [P1, mulOption, quot_sub, quot_add]
simp_rw [neg_sub', neg_add, quot_mul_neg, neg_neg]
lemma mulOption_lt_mul_iff_P3 {i j} :
⟦mulOption x y i j⟧ < (⟦x * y⟧ : Game) ↔ P3 (x.moveLeft i) x (y.moveLeft j) y := by
dsimp only [mulOption, quot_sub, quot_add]
exact sub_lt_iff_lt_add'
lemma P1_of_eq (he : x₁ ≈ x₃) (h₁ : P2 x₁ x₃ y₁) (h₃ : P2 x₁ x₃ y₃) (h3 : P3 x₁ x₂ y₂ y₃) :
P1 x₁ x₂ x₃ y₁ y₂ y₃ := by
rw [P1, ← h₁ he, ← h₃ he, sub_lt_sub_iff]
convert add_lt_add_left h3 ⟦x₁ * y₁⟧ using 1 <;> abel
lemma P1_of_lt (h₁ : P3 x₃ x₂ y₂ y₃) (h₂ : P3 x₁ x₃ y₂ y₁) : P1 x₁ x₂ x₃ y₁ y₂ y₃ := by
rw [P1, sub_lt_sub_iff, ← add_lt_add_iff_left ⟦x₃ * y₂⟧]
convert add_lt_add h₁ h₂ using 1 <;> abel
/-- The type of lists of arguments for P1, P2, and P4. -/
inductive Args : Type (u + 1)
| P1 (x y : PGame.{u}) : Args
| P24 (x₁ x₂ y : PGame.{u}) : Args
/-- The multiset associated to a list of arguments. -/
def Args.toMultiset : Args → Multiset PGame
| (Args.P1 x y) => {x, y}
| (Args.P24 x₁ x₂ y) => {x₁, x₂, y}
/-- A list of arguments is numeric if all the arguments are. -/
def Args.Numeric (a : Args) := ∀ x ∈ a.toMultiset, SetTheory.PGame.Numeric x
lemma Args.numeric_P1 {x y} : (Args.P1 x y).Numeric ↔ x.Numeric ∧ y.Numeric := by
simp [Args.Numeric, Args.toMultiset]
lemma Args.numeric_P24 {x₁ x₂ y} :
(Args.P24 x₁ x₂ y).Numeric ↔ x₁.Numeric ∧ x₂.Numeric ∧ y.Numeric := by
simp [Args.Numeric, Args.toMultiset]
open Relation
/-- The relation specifying when a list of (pregame) arguments is considered simpler than another:
`ArgsRel a₁ a₂` is true if `a₁`, considered as a multiset, can be obtained from `a₂` by
repeatedly removing a pregame from `a₂` and adding back one or two options of the pregame. -/
def ArgsRel := InvImage (TransGen <| CutExpand IsOption) Args.toMultiset
/-- `ArgsRel` is well-founded. -/
theorem argsRel_wf : WellFounded ArgsRel := InvImage.wf _ wf_isOption.cutExpand.transGen
/-- The statement that we will show by induction using the well-founded relation `ArgsRel`. -/
def P124 : Args → Prop
| (Args.P1 x y) => Numeric (x * y)
| (Args.P24 x₁ x₂ y) => P24 x₁ x₂ y
/-- The property that all arguments are numeric is leftward-closed under `ArgsRel`. -/
lemma ArgsRel.numeric_closed {a' a} : ArgsRel a' a → a.Numeric → a'.Numeric :=
TransGen.closed' <| @cutExpand_closed _ IsOption ⟨wf_isOption.isIrrefl.1⟩ _ Numeric.isOption
/-- A specialized induction hypothesis used to prove P1. -/
def IH1 (x y : PGame) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃x₁ x₂ y'⦄, IsOption x₁ x → IsOption x₂ x → (y' = y ∨ IsOption y' y) → P24 x₁ x₂ y'
/-! #### Symmetry properties of `IH1` -/
lemma ih1_neg_left : IH1 x y → IH1 (-x) y :=
fun h x₁ x₂ y' h₁ h₂ hy ↦ by
rw [isOption_neg] at h₁ h₂
exact P24_neg_left.2 (h h₂ h₁ hy)
lemma ih1_neg_right : IH1 x y → IH1 x (-y) :=
fun h x₁ x₂ y' ↦ by
rw [← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, isOption_neg, P24_neg_right]
apply h
/-! #### Specialize `ih` to obtain specialized induction hypotheses for P1 -/
lemma numeric_option_mul (ih : ∀ a, ArgsRel a (Args.P1 x y) → P124 a) (h : IsOption x' x) :
(x' * y).Numeric :=
ih (Args.P1 x' y) (TransGen.single <| cutExpand_pair_left h)
lemma numeric_mul_option (ih : ∀ a, ArgsRel a (Args.P1 x y) → P124 a) (h : IsOption y' y) :
(x * y').Numeric :=
ih (Args.P1 x y') (TransGen.single <| cutExpand_pair_right h)
lemma numeric_option_mul_option (ih : ∀ a, ArgsRel a (Args.P1 x y) → P124 a) (hx : IsOption x' x)
(hy : IsOption y' y) : (x' * y').Numeric :=
ih (Args.P1 x' y') ((TransGen.single <| cutExpand_pair_right hy).tail <| cutExpand_pair_left hx)
lemma ih1 (ih : ∀ a, ArgsRel a (Args.P1 x y) → P124 a) : IH1 x y := by
rintro x₁ x₂ y' h₁ h₂ (rfl|hy) <;> apply ih (Args.P24 _ _ _)
on_goal 2 => refine TransGen.tail ?_ (cutExpand_pair_right hy)
all_goals exact TransGen.single (cutExpand_double_left h₁ h₂)
lemma ih1_swap (ih : ∀ a, ArgsRel a (Args.P1 x y) → P124 a) : IH1 y x := ih1 <| by
simp_rw [ArgsRel, InvImage, Args.toMultiset, Multiset.pair_comm] at ih ⊢
exact ih
lemma P3_of_ih (hy : Numeric y) (ihyx : IH1 y x) (i k l) :
P3 (x.moveLeft i) x (y.moveLeft k) (-(-y).moveLeft l) :=
P3_comm.2 <| ((ihyx (IsOption.moveLeft k) (isOption_neg.1 <| .moveLeft l) <| Or.inl rfl).2
(by rw [moveLeft_neg, neg_neg]; apply hy.left_lt_right)).1 i
lemma P24_of_ih (ihxy : IH1 x y) (i j) : P24 (x.moveLeft i) (x.moveLeft j) y :=
ihxy (IsOption.moveLeft i) (IsOption.moveLeft j) (Or.inl rfl)
section
lemma mulOption_lt_of_lt (hy : y.Numeric) (ihxy : IH1 x y) (ihyx : IH1 y x) (i j k l)
(h : x.moveLeft i < x.moveLeft j) :
(⟦mulOption x y i k⟧ : Game) < -⟦mulOption x (-y) j l⟧ :=
mulOption_lt_iff_P1.2 <| P1_of_lt (P3_of_ih hy ihyx j k l) <| ((P24_of_ih ihxy i j).2 h).1 k
lemma mulOption_lt (hx : x.Numeric) (hy : y.Numeric) (ihxy : IH1 x y) (ihyx : IH1 y x) (i j k l) :
(⟦mulOption x y i k⟧ : Game) < -⟦mulOption x (-y) j l⟧ := by
obtain (h|h|h) := lt_or_equiv_or_gt (hx.moveLeft i) (hx.moveLeft j)
· exact mulOption_lt_of_lt hy ihxy ihyx i j k l h
· have ml := @IsOption.moveLeft
exact mulOption_lt_iff_P1.2 (P1_of_eq h (P24_of_ih ihxy i j).1
(ihxy (ml i) (ml j) <| Or.inr <| isOption_neg.1 <| ml l).1 <| P3_of_ih hy ihyx i k l)
· rw [mulOption_neg_neg, lt_neg]
exact mulOption_lt_of_lt hy.neg (ih1_neg_right ihxy) (ih1_neg_left ihyx) j i l _ h
end
/-- P1 follows from the induction hypothesis. -/
theorem P1_of_ih (ih : ∀ a, ArgsRel a (Args.P1 x y) → P124 a) (hx : x.Numeric) (hy : y.Numeric) :
(x * y).Numeric := by
have ihxy := ih1 ih
have ihyx := ih1_swap ih
have ihxyn := ih1_neg_left (ih1_neg_right ihxy)
have ihyxn := ih1_neg_left (ih1_neg_right ihyx)
refine numeric_def.mpr ⟨?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp_rw [lt_iff_game_lt]
intro i
rw [rightMoves_mul_iff]
constructor <;> (intro j l; revert i; rw [leftMoves_mul_iff (_ > ·)]; constructor <;> intro i k)
· apply mulOption_lt hx hy ihxy ihyx
· simp_rw [← mulOption_symm (-y), mulOption_neg_neg x]
apply mulOption_lt hy.neg hx.neg ihyxn ihxyn
· simp only [← mulOption_symm y]
apply mulOption_lt hy hx ihyx ihxy
· rw [mulOption_neg_neg y]
apply mulOption_lt hx.neg hy.neg ihxyn ihyxn
all_goals
cases x; cases y
rintro (⟨i,j⟩|⟨i,j⟩) <;>
refine ((numeric_option_mul ih ?_).add <| numeric_mul_option ih ?_).sub
(numeric_option_mul_option ih ?_ ?_) <;>
solve_by_elim [IsOption.mk_left, IsOption.mk_right]
/-- A specialized induction hypothesis used to prove P2 and P4. -/
def IH24 (x₁ x₂ y : PGame) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃z⦄, (IsOption z x₁ → P24 z x₂ y) ∧ (IsOption z x₂ → P24 x₁ z y) ∧ (IsOption z y → P24 x₁ x₂ z)
/-- A specialized induction hypothesis used to prove P4. -/
def IH4 (x₁ x₂ y : PGame) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃z w⦄, IsOption w y → (IsOption z x₁ → P2 z x₂ w) ∧ (IsOption z x₂ → P2 x₁ z w)
/-! #### Specialize `ih'` to obtain specialized induction hypotheses for P2 and P4 -/
lemma ih₁₂ (ih' : ∀ a, ArgsRel a (Args.P24 x₁ x₂ y) → P124 a) : IH24 x₁ x₂ y := by
rw [IH24]
refine fun z ↦ ⟨?_, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
refine fun h ↦ ih' (Args.P24 _ _ _) (TransGen.single ?_)
· exact (cutExpand_add_right {y}).2 (cutExpand_pair_left h)
· exact (cutExpand_add_left {x₁}).2 (cutExpand_pair_left h)
· exact (cutExpand_add_left {x₁}).2 (cutExpand_pair_right h)
lemma ih₂₁ (ih' : ∀ a, ArgsRel a (Args.P24 x₁ x₂ y) → P124 a) : IH24 x₂ x₁ y := ih₁₂ <| by
simp_rw [ArgsRel, InvImage, Args.toMultiset, Multiset.pair_comm] at ih' ⊢
suffices {x₁, y, x₂} = {x₂, y, x₁} by rwa [← this]
dsimp only [Multiset.insert_eq_cons, ← Multiset.singleton_add] at ih' ⊢
abel
lemma ih4 (ih' : ∀ a, ArgsRel a (Args.P24 x₁ x₂ y) → P124 a) : IH4 x₁ x₂ y := by
refine fun z w h ↦ ⟨?_, ?_⟩
all_goals
intro h'
apply (ih' (Args.P24 _ _ _) <| (TransGen.single _).tail <|
(cutExpand_add_left {x₁}).2 <| cutExpand_pair_right h).1
try exact (cutExpand_add_right {w}).2 <| cutExpand_pair_left h'
try exact (cutExpand_add_right {w}).2 <| cutExpand_pair_right h'
lemma numeric_of_ih (ih' : ∀ a, ArgsRel a (Args.P24 x₁ x₂ y) → P124 a) :
(x₁ * y).Numeric ∧ (x₂ * y).Numeric := by
constructor <;> refine ih' (Args.P1 _ _) (TransGen.single ?_)
· exact (cutExpand_add_right {y}).2 <| (cutExpand_add_left {x₁}).2 cutExpand_zero
· exact (cutExpand_add_right {x₂, y}).2 cutExpand_zero
/-- Symmetry properties of `IH24`. -/
lemma ih24_neg : IH24 x₁ x₂ y → IH24 (-x₂) (-x₁) y ∧ IH24 x₁ x₂ (-y) := by
simp_rw [IH24, ← P24_neg_right, isOption_neg]
refine fun h ↦ ⟨fun z ↦ ⟨?_, ?_, ?_⟩,
fun z ↦ ⟨(@h z).1, (@h z).2.1, P24_neg_right.2 ∘ (@h <| -z).2.2⟩⟩
all_goals
rw [P24_neg_left]
simp only [neg_neg]
first | exact (@h <| -z).2.1 | exact (@h <| -z).1 | exact (@h z).2.2
/-- Symmetry properties of `IH4`. -/
lemma ih4_neg : IH4 x₁ x₂ y → IH4 (-x₂) (-x₁) y ∧ IH4 x₁ x₂ (-y) := by
simp_rw [IH4, isOption_neg]
refine fun h ↦ ⟨fun z w h' ↦ ?_, fun z w h' ↦ ?_⟩
· convert (h h').symm using 2 <;> rw [P2_neg_left, neg_neg]
· convert h h' using 2 <;> rw [P2_neg_right]
lemma mulOption_lt_mul_of_equiv (hn : x₁.Numeric) (h : IH24 x₁ x₂ y) (he : x₁ ≈ x₂) (i j) :
| ⟦mulOption x₁ y i j⟧ < (⟦x₂ * y⟧ : Game) := by
convert sub_lt_iff_lt_add'.2 ((((@h _).1 <| IsOption.moveLeft i).2 _).1 j) using 1
· rw [← ((@h _).2.2 <| IsOption.moveLeft j).1 he]
rfl
· rw [← lt_congr_right he]
apply hn.moveLeft_lt
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Surreal/Multiplication.lean | 340 | 346 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Moritz Doll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Moritz Doll
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.LinearPMap
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.Basic
/-!
# Partially defined linear operators over topological vector spaces
We define basic notions of partially defined linear operators, which we call unbounded operators
for short.
In this file we prove all elementary properties of unbounded operators that do not assume that the
underlying spaces are normed.
## Main definitions
* `LinearPMap.IsClosed`: An unbounded operator is closed iff its graph is closed.
* `LinearPMap.IsClosable`: An unbounded operator is closable iff the closure of its graph is a
graph.
* `LinearPMap.closure`: For a closable unbounded operator `f : LinearPMap R E F` the closure is
the smallest closed extension of `f`. If `f` is not closable, then `f.closure` is defined as `f`.
* `LinearPMap.HasCore`: a submodule contained in the domain is a core if restricting to the core
does not lose information about the unbounded operator.
## Main statements
* `LinearPMap.closable_iff_exists_closed_extension`: an unbounded operator is closable iff it has a
closed extension.
* `LinearPMap.closable.existsUnique`: there exists a unique closure
* `LinearPMap.closureHasCore`: the domain of `f` is a core of its closure
## References
* [J. Weidmann, *Linear Operators in Hilbert Spaces*][weidmann_linear]
## Tags
Unbounded operators, closed operators
-/
open Topology
variable {R E F : Type*}
variable [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup F]
variable [Module R E] [Module R F]
variable [TopologicalSpace E] [TopologicalSpace F]
namespace LinearPMap
/-! ### Closed and closable operators -/
/-- An unbounded operator is closed iff its graph is closed. -/
def IsClosed (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) : Prop :=
_root_.IsClosed (f.graph : Set (E × F))
variable [ContinuousAdd E] [ContinuousAdd F]
variable [TopologicalSpace R] [ContinuousSMul R E] [ContinuousSMul R F]
/-- An unbounded operator is closable iff the closure of its graph is a graph. -/
def IsClosable (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) : Prop :=
∃ f' : LinearPMap R E F, f.graph.topologicalClosure = f'.graph
/-- A closed operator is trivially closable. -/
theorem IsClosed.isClosable {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} (hf : f.IsClosed) : f.IsClosable :=
⟨f, hf.submodule_topologicalClosure_eq⟩
/-- If `g` has a closable extension `f`, then `g` itself is closable. -/
theorem IsClosable.leIsClosable {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} (hf : f.IsClosable) (hfg : g ≤ f) :
g.IsClosable := by
obtain ⟨f', hf⟩ := hf
have : g.graph.topologicalClosure ≤ f'.graph := by
rw [← hf]
exact Submodule.topologicalClosure_mono (le_graph_of_le hfg)
use g.graph.topologicalClosure.toLinearPMap
rw [Submodule.toLinearPMap_graph_eq]
exact fun _ hx hx' => f'.graph_fst_eq_zero_snd (this hx) hx'
/-- The closure is unique. -/
theorem IsClosable.existsUnique {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} (hf : f.IsClosable) :
∃! f' : E →ₗ.[R] F, f.graph.topologicalClosure = f'.graph := by
refine existsUnique_of_exists_of_unique hf fun _ _ hy₁ hy₂ => eq_of_eq_graph ?_
rw [← hy₁, ← hy₂]
open Classical in
/-- If `f` is closable, then `f.closure` is the closure. Otherwise it is defined
as `f.closure = f`. -/
noncomputable def closure (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) : E →ₗ.[R] F :=
if hf : f.IsClosable then hf.choose else f
theorem closure_def {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} (hf : f.IsClosable) : f.closure = hf.choose := by
simp [closure, hf]
theorem closure_def' {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} (hf : ¬f.IsClosable) : f.closure = f := by simp [closure, hf]
/-- The closure (as a submodule) of the graph is equal to the graph of the closure
(as a `LinearPMap`). -/
theorem IsClosable.graph_closure_eq_closure_graph {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} (hf : f.IsClosable) :
f.graph.topologicalClosure = f.closure.graph := by
rw [closure_def hf]
exact hf.choose_spec
/-- A `LinearPMap` is contained in its closure. -/
theorem le_closure (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) : f ≤ f.closure := by
by_cases hf : f.IsClosable
· refine le_of_le_graph ?_
rw [← hf.graph_closure_eq_closure_graph]
exact (graph f).le_topologicalClosure
rw [closure_def' hf]
theorem IsClosable.closure_mono {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} (hg : g.IsClosable) (h : f ≤ g) :
f.closure ≤ g.closure := by
refine le_of_le_graph ?_
rw [← (hg.leIsClosable h).graph_closure_eq_closure_graph]
rw [← hg.graph_closure_eq_closure_graph]
exact Submodule.topologicalClosure_mono (le_graph_of_le h)
/-- If `f` is closable, then the closure is closed. -/
theorem IsClosable.closure_isClosed {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} (hf : f.IsClosable) : f.closure.IsClosed := by
rw [IsClosed, ← hf.graph_closure_eq_closure_graph]
exact f.graph.isClosed_topologicalClosure
/-- If `f` is closable, then the closure is closable. -/
theorem IsClosable.closureIsClosable {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} (hf : f.IsClosable) : f.closure.IsClosable :=
hf.closure_isClosed.isClosable
theorem isClosable_iff_exists_closed_extension {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} :
f.IsClosable ↔ ∃ g : E →ₗ.[R] F, g.IsClosed ∧ f ≤ g :=
⟨fun h => ⟨f.closure, h.closure_isClosed, f.le_closure⟩, fun ⟨_, hg, h⟩ =>
hg.isClosable.leIsClosable h⟩
/-! ### The core of a linear operator -/
|
/-- A submodule `S` is a core of `f` if the closure of the restriction of `f` to `S` is `f`. -/
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/Module/LinearPMap.lean | 136 | 138 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gaussian.GaussianIntegral
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.CauchyIntegral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Pi
import Mathlib.Analysis.Fourier.FourierTransform
/-!
# Fourier transform of the Gaussian
We prove that the Fourier transform of the Gaussian function is another Gaussian:
* `integral_cexp_quadratic`: general formula for `∫ (x : ℝ), exp (b * x ^ 2 + c * x + d)`
* `fourierIntegral_gaussian`: for all complex `b` and `t` with `0 < re b`, we have
`∫ x:ℝ, exp (I * t * x) * exp (-b * x^2) = (π / b) ^ (1 / 2) * exp (-t ^ 2 / (4 * b))`.
* `fourierIntegral_gaussian_pi`: a variant with `b` and `t` scaled to give a more symmetric
statement, and formulated in terms of the Fourier transform operator `𝓕`.
We also give versions of these formulas in finite-dimensional inner product spaces, see
`integral_cexp_neg_mul_sq_norm_add` and `fourierIntegral_gaussian_innerProductSpace`.
-/
/-!
## Fourier integral of Gaussian functions
-/
open Real Set MeasureTheory Filter Asymptotics intervalIntegral
open scoped Real Topology FourierTransform RealInnerProductSpace
open Complex hiding exp continuous_exp abs_of_nonneg sq_abs
noncomputable section
namespace GaussianFourier
variable {b : ℂ}
/-- The integral of the Gaussian function over the vertical edges of a rectangle
with vertices at `(±T, 0)` and `(±T, c)`. -/
def verticalIntegral (b : ℂ) (c T : ℝ) : ℂ :=
∫ y : ℝ in (0 : ℝ)..c, I * (cexp (-b * (T + y * I) ^ 2) - cexp (-b * (T - y * I) ^ 2))
/-- Explicit formula for the norm of the Gaussian function along the vertical
edges. -/
theorem norm_cexp_neg_mul_sq_add_mul_I (b : ℂ) (c T : ℝ) :
‖cexp (-b * (T + c * I) ^ 2)‖ = exp (-(b.re * T ^ 2 - 2 * b.im * c * T - b.re * c ^ 2)) := by
rw [Complex.norm_exp, neg_mul, neg_re, ← re_add_im b]
simp only [sq, re_add_im, mul_re, mul_im, add_re, add_im, ofReal_re, ofReal_im, I_re, I_im]
ring_nf
theorem norm_cexp_neg_mul_sq_add_mul_I' (hb : b.re ≠ 0) (c T : ℝ) :
‖cexp (-b * (T + c * I) ^ 2)‖ =
exp (-(b.re * (T - b.im * c / b.re) ^ 2 - c ^ 2 * (b.im ^ 2 / b.re + b.re))) := by
| have :
b.re * T ^ 2 - 2 * b.im * c * T - b.re * c ^ 2 =
b.re * (T - b.im * c / b.re) ^ 2 - c ^ 2 * (b.im ^ 2 / b.re + b.re) := by
field_simp; ring
rw [norm_cexp_neg_mul_sq_add_mul_I, this]
theorem verticalIntegral_norm_le (hb : 0 < b.re) (c : ℝ) {T : ℝ} (hT : 0 ≤ T) :
‖verticalIntegral b c T‖ ≤
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Gaussian/FourierTransform.lean | 59 | 66 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Parity
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Units
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.IntUnitsPower
/-!
# Integer powers of (-1)
This file defines the map `negOnePow : ℤ → ℤˣ` which sends `n` to `(-1 : ℤˣ) ^ n`.
The definition of `negOnePow` and some lemmas first appeared in contributions by
Johan Commelin to the Liquid Tensor Experiment.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
namespace Int
/-- The map `ℤ → ℤˣ` which sends `n` to `(-1 : ℤˣ) ^ n`. -/
def negOnePow (n : ℤ) : ℤˣ := (-1 : ℤˣ) ^ n
lemma negOnePow_def (n : ℤ) : n.negOnePow = (-1 : ℤˣ) ^ n := rfl
lemma negOnePow_add (n₁ n₂ : ℤ) :
(n₁ + n₂).negOnePow = n₁.negOnePow * n₂.negOnePow :=
zpow_add _ _ _
@[simp]
lemma negOnePow_zero : negOnePow 0 = 1 := rfl
@[simp]
lemma negOnePow_one : negOnePow 1 = -1 := rfl
lemma negOnePow_succ (n : ℤ) : (n + 1).negOnePow = - n.negOnePow := by
rw [negOnePow_add, negOnePow_one, mul_neg, mul_one]
lemma negOnePow_even (n : ℤ) (hn : Even n) : n.negOnePow = 1 := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := hn
rw [negOnePow_add, units_mul_self]
@[simp]
lemma negOnePow_two_mul (n : ℤ) : (2 * n).negOnePow = 1 :=
negOnePow_even _ ⟨n, two_mul n⟩
lemma negOnePow_odd (n : ℤ) (hn : Odd n) : n.negOnePow = -1 := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := hn
simp only [negOnePow_add, negOnePow_two_mul, negOnePow_one, mul_neg, mul_one]
@[simp]
lemma negOnePow_two_mul_add_one (n : ℤ) : (2 * n + 1).negOnePow = -1 :=
negOnePow_odd _ ⟨n, rfl⟩
lemma negOnePow_eq_one_iff (n : ℤ) : n.negOnePow = 1 ↔ Even n := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [← Int.not_odd_iff_even]
intro h'
| simp only [negOnePow_odd _ h'] at h
contradiction
· exact negOnePow_even n
lemma negOnePow_eq_neg_one_iff (n : ℤ) : n.negOnePow = -1 ↔ Odd n := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [← Int.not_even_iff_odd]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/NegOnePow.lean | 64 | 71 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Logic.Encodable.Pi
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
/-!
# The primitive recursive functions
The primitive recursive functions are the least collection of functions
`ℕ → ℕ` which are closed under projections (using the `pair`
pairing function), composition, zero, successor, and primitive recursion
(i.e. `Nat.rec` where the motive is `C n := ℕ`).
We can extend this definition to a large class of basic types by
using canonical encodings of types as natural numbers (Gödel numbering),
which we implement through the type class `Encodable`. (More precisely,
we need that the composition of encode with decode yields a
primitive recursive function, so we have the `Primcodable` type class
for this.)
In the above, the pairing function is primitive recursive by definition.
This deviates from the textbook definition of primitive recursive functions,
which instead work with *`n`-ary* functions. We formalize the textbook
definition in `Nat.Primrec'`. `Nat.Primrec'.prim_iff` then proves it is
equivalent to our chosen formulation. For more discussionn of this and
other design choices in this formalization, see [carneiro2019].
## Main definitions
- `Nat.Primrec f`: `f` is primitive recursive, for functions `f : ℕ → ℕ`
- `Primrec f`: `f` is primitive recursive, for functions between `Primcodable` types
- `Primcodable α`: well-behaved encoding of `α` into `ℕ`, i.e. one such that roundtripping through
the encoding functions adds no computational power
## References
* [Mario Carneiro, *Formalizing computability theory via partial recursive functions*][carneiro2019]
-/
open List (Vector)
open Denumerable Encodable Function
namespace Nat
/-- Calls the given function on a pair of entries `n`, encoded via the pairing function. -/
@[simp, reducible]
def unpaired {α} (f : ℕ → ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) : α :=
f n.unpair.1 n.unpair.2
/-- The primitive recursive functions `ℕ → ℕ`. -/
protected inductive Primrec : (ℕ → ℕ) → Prop
| zero : Nat.Primrec fun _ => 0
| protected succ : Nat.Primrec succ
| left : Nat.Primrec fun n => n.unpair.1
| right : Nat.Primrec fun n => n.unpair.2
| pair {f g} : Nat.Primrec f → Nat.Primrec g → Nat.Primrec fun n => pair (f n) (g n)
| comp {f g} : Nat.Primrec f → Nat.Primrec g → Nat.Primrec fun n => f (g n)
| prec {f g} :
Nat.Primrec f →
Nat.Primrec g →
Nat.Primrec (unpaired fun z n => n.rec (f z) fun y IH => g <| pair z <| pair y IH)
namespace Primrec
theorem of_eq {f g : ℕ → ℕ} (hf : Nat.Primrec f) (H : ∀ n, f n = g n) : Nat.Primrec g :=
(funext H : f = g) ▸ hf
theorem const : ∀ n : ℕ, Nat.Primrec fun _ => n
| 0 => zero
| n + 1 => Primrec.succ.comp (const n)
protected theorem id : Nat.Primrec id :=
(left.pair right).of_eq fun n => by simp
theorem prec1 {f} (m : ℕ) (hf : Nat.Primrec f) :
Nat.Primrec fun n => n.rec m fun y IH => f <| Nat.pair y IH :=
((prec (const m) (hf.comp right)).comp (zero.pair Primrec.id)).of_eq fun n => by simp
theorem casesOn1 {f} (m : ℕ) (hf : Nat.Primrec f) : Nat.Primrec (Nat.casesOn · m f) :=
(prec1 m (hf.comp left)).of_eq <| by simp
-- Porting note: `Nat.Primrec.casesOn` is already declared as a recursor.
theorem casesOn' {f g} (hf : Nat.Primrec f) (hg : Nat.Primrec g) :
Nat.Primrec (unpaired fun z n => n.casesOn (f z) fun y => g <| Nat.pair z y) :=
(prec hf (hg.comp (pair left (left.comp right)))).of_eq fun n => by simp
protected theorem swap : Nat.Primrec (unpaired (swap Nat.pair)) :=
(pair right left).of_eq fun n => by simp
theorem swap' {f} (hf : Nat.Primrec (unpaired f)) : Nat.Primrec (unpaired (swap f)) :=
(hf.comp .swap).of_eq fun n => by simp
theorem pred : Nat.Primrec pred :=
(casesOn1 0 Primrec.id).of_eq fun n => by cases n <;> simp [*]
theorem add : Nat.Primrec (unpaired (· + ·)) :=
(prec .id ((Primrec.succ.comp right).comp right)).of_eq fun p => by
simp; induction p.unpair.2 <;> simp [*, Nat.add_assoc]
theorem sub : Nat.Primrec (unpaired (· - ·)) :=
(prec .id ((pred.comp right).comp right)).of_eq fun p => by
simp; induction p.unpair.2 <;> simp [*, Nat.sub_add_eq]
theorem mul : Nat.Primrec (unpaired (· * ·)) :=
(prec zero (add.comp (pair left (right.comp right)))).of_eq fun p => by
simp; induction p.unpair.2 <;> simp [*, mul_succ, add_comm _ (unpair p).fst]
theorem pow : Nat.Primrec (unpaired (· ^ ·)) :=
(prec (const 1) (mul.comp (pair (right.comp right) left))).of_eq fun p => by
simp; induction p.unpair.2 <;> simp [*, Nat.pow_succ]
end Primrec
end Nat
/-- A `Primcodable` type is, essentially, an `Encodable` type for which
the encode/decode functions are primitive recursive.
However, such a definition is circular.
Instead, we ask that the composition of `decode : ℕ → Option α` with
`encode : Option α → ℕ` is primitive recursive. Said composition is
the identity function, restricted to the image of `encode`.
Thus, in a way, the added requirement ensures that no predicates
can be smuggled in through a cunning choice of the subset of `ℕ` into
which the type is encoded. -/
class Primcodable (α : Type*) extends Encodable α where
-- Porting note: was `prim [] `.
-- This means that `prim` does not take the type explicitly in Lean 4
prim : Nat.Primrec fun n => Encodable.encode (decode n)
namespace Primcodable
open Nat.Primrec
instance (priority := 10) ofDenumerable (α) [Denumerable α] : Primcodable α :=
⟨Nat.Primrec.succ.of_eq <| by simp⟩
/-- Builds a `Primcodable` instance from an equivalence to a `Primcodable` type. -/
def ofEquiv (α) {β} [Primcodable α] (e : β ≃ α) : Primcodable β :=
{ __ := Encodable.ofEquiv α e
prim := (@Primcodable.prim α _).of_eq fun n => by
rw [decode_ofEquiv]
cases (@decode α _ n) <;>
simp [encode_ofEquiv] }
instance empty : Primcodable Empty :=
⟨zero⟩
instance unit : Primcodable PUnit :=
⟨(casesOn1 1 zero).of_eq fun n => by cases n <;> simp⟩
instance option {α : Type*} [h : Primcodable α] : Primcodable (Option α) :=
⟨(casesOn1 1 ((casesOn1 0 (.comp .succ .succ)).comp (@Primcodable.prim α _))).of_eq fun n => by
cases n with
| zero => rfl
| succ n =>
rw [decode_option_succ]
cases H : @decode α _ n <;> simp [H]⟩
instance bool : Primcodable Bool :=
⟨(casesOn1 1 (casesOn1 2 zero)).of_eq fun n => match n with
| 0 => rfl
| 1 => rfl
| (n + 2) => by rw [decode_ge_two] <;> simp⟩
end Primcodable
/-- `Primrec f` means `f` is primitive recursive (after
encoding its input and output as natural numbers). -/
def Primrec {α β} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] (f : α → β) : Prop :=
Nat.Primrec fun n => encode ((@decode α _ n).map f)
namespace Primrec
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ]
open Nat.Primrec
protected theorem encode : Primrec (@encode α _) :=
(@Primcodable.prim α _).of_eq fun n => by cases @decode α _ n <;> rfl
protected theorem decode : Primrec (@decode α _) :=
Nat.Primrec.succ.comp (@Primcodable.prim α _)
theorem dom_denumerable {α β} [Denumerable α] [Primcodable β] {f : α → β} :
Primrec f ↔ Nat.Primrec fun n => encode (f (ofNat α n)) :=
⟨fun h => (pred.comp h).of_eq fun n => by simp, fun h =>
(Nat.Primrec.succ.comp h).of_eq fun n => by simp⟩
theorem nat_iff {f : ℕ → ℕ} : Primrec f ↔ Nat.Primrec f :=
dom_denumerable
theorem encdec : Primrec fun n => encode (@decode α _ n) :=
nat_iff.2 Primcodable.prim
theorem option_some : Primrec (@some α) :=
((casesOn1 0 (Nat.Primrec.succ.comp .succ)).comp (@Primcodable.prim α _)).of_eq fun n => by
cases @decode α _ n <;> simp
theorem of_eq {f g : α → σ} (hf : Primrec f) (H : ∀ n, f n = g n) : Primrec g :=
(funext H : f = g) ▸ hf
theorem const (x : σ) : Primrec fun _ : α => x :=
((casesOn1 0 (.const (encode x).succ)).comp (@Primcodable.prim α _)).of_eq fun n => by
cases @decode α _ n <;> rfl
protected theorem id : Primrec (@id α) :=
(@Primcodable.prim α).of_eq <| by simp
theorem comp {f : β → σ} {g : α → β} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec g) : Primrec fun a => f (g a) :=
((casesOn1 0 (.comp hf (pred.comp hg))).comp (@Primcodable.prim α _)).of_eq fun n => by
cases @decode α _ n <;> simp [encodek]
theorem succ : Primrec Nat.succ :=
nat_iff.2 Nat.Primrec.succ
theorem pred : Primrec Nat.pred :=
nat_iff.2 Nat.Primrec.pred
theorem encode_iff {f : α → σ} : (Primrec fun a => encode (f a)) ↔ Primrec f :=
⟨fun h => Nat.Primrec.of_eq h fun n => by cases @decode α _ n <;> rfl, Primrec.encode.comp⟩
theorem ofNat_iff {α β} [Denumerable α] [Primcodable β] {f : α → β} :
Primrec f ↔ Primrec fun n => f (ofNat α n) :=
dom_denumerable.trans <| nat_iff.symm.trans encode_iff
protected theorem ofNat (α) [Denumerable α] : Primrec (ofNat α) :=
ofNat_iff.1 Primrec.id
theorem option_some_iff {f : α → σ} : (Primrec fun a => some (f a)) ↔ Primrec f :=
⟨fun h => encode_iff.1 <| pred.comp <| encode_iff.2 h, option_some.comp⟩
theorem of_equiv {β} {e : β ≃ α} :
haveI := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
Primrec e :=
letI : Primcodable β := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
encode_iff.1 Primrec.encode
theorem of_equiv_symm {β} {e : β ≃ α} :
haveI := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
Primrec e.symm :=
letI := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
encode_iff.1 (show Primrec fun a => encode (e (e.symm a)) by simp [Primrec.encode])
theorem of_equiv_iff {β} (e : β ≃ α) {f : σ → β} :
haveI := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
(Primrec fun a => e (f a)) ↔ Primrec f :=
letI := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
⟨fun h => (of_equiv_symm.comp h).of_eq fun a => by simp, of_equiv.comp⟩
theorem of_equiv_symm_iff {β} (e : β ≃ α) {f : σ → α} :
haveI := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
(Primrec fun a => e.symm (f a)) ↔ Primrec f :=
letI := Primcodable.ofEquiv α e
⟨fun h => (of_equiv.comp h).of_eq fun a => by simp, of_equiv_symm.comp⟩
end Primrec
namespace Primcodable
open Nat.Primrec
instance prod {α β} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] : Primcodable (α × β) :=
⟨((casesOn' zero ((casesOn' zero .succ).comp (pair right ((@Primcodable.prim β).comp left)))).comp
(pair right ((@Primcodable.prim α).comp left))).of_eq
fun n => by
simp only [Nat.unpaired, Nat.unpair_pair, decode_prod_val]
cases @decode α _ n.unpair.1; · simp
cases @decode β _ n.unpair.2 <;> simp⟩
end Primcodable
namespace Primrec
variable {α : Type*} [Primcodable α]
open Nat.Primrec
theorem fst {α β} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] : Primrec (@Prod.fst α β) :=
((casesOn' zero
((casesOn' zero (Nat.Primrec.succ.comp left)).comp
(pair right ((@Primcodable.prim β).comp left)))).comp
(pair right ((@Primcodable.prim α).comp left))).of_eq
fun n => by
simp only [Nat.unpaired, Nat.unpair_pair, decode_prod_val]
cases @decode α _ n.unpair.1 <;> simp
cases @decode β _ n.unpair.2 <;> simp
theorem snd {α β} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] : Primrec (@Prod.snd α β) :=
((casesOn' zero
((casesOn' zero (Nat.Primrec.succ.comp right)).comp
(pair right ((@Primcodable.prim β).comp left)))).comp
(pair right ((@Primcodable.prim α).comp left))).of_eq
fun n => by
simp only [Nat.unpaired, Nat.unpair_pair, decode_prod_val]
cases @decode α _ n.unpair.1 <;> simp
cases @decode β _ n.unpair.2 <;> simp
theorem pair {α β γ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable γ] {f : α → β} {g : α → γ}
(hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec g) : Primrec fun a => (f a, g a) :=
((casesOn1 0
(Nat.Primrec.succ.comp <|
.pair (Nat.Primrec.pred.comp hf) (Nat.Primrec.pred.comp hg))).comp
(@Primcodable.prim α _)).of_eq
fun n => by cases @decode α _ n <;> simp [encodek]
theorem unpair : Primrec Nat.unpair :=
(pair (nat_iff.2 .left) (nat_iff.2 .right)).of_eq fun n => by simp
theorem list_getElem?₁ : ∀ l : List α, Primrec (l[·]? : ℕ → Option α)
| [] => dom_denumerable.2 zero
| a :: l =>
dom_denumerable.2 <|
(casesOn1 (encode a).succ <| dom_denumerable.1 <| list_getElem?₁ l).of_eq fun n => by
cases n <;> simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-14")] alias list_get?₁ := list_getElem?₁
end Primrec
/-- `Primrec₂ f` means `f` is a binary primitive recursive function.
This is technically unnecessary since we can always curry all
the arguments together, but there are enough natural two-arg
functions that it is convenient to express this directly. -/
def Primrec₂ {α β σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ] (f : α → β → σ) :=
Primrec fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2
/-- `PrimrecPred p` means `p : α → Prop` is a (decidable)
primitive recursive predicate, which is to say that
`decide ∘ p : α → Bool` is primitive recursive. -/
def PrimrecPred {α} [Primcodable α] (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :=
Primrec fun a => decide (p a)
/-- `PrimrecRel p` means `p : α → β → Prop` is a (decidable)
primitive recursive relation, which is to say that
`decide ∘ p : α → β → Bool` is primitive recursive. -/
def PrimrecRel {α β} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] (s : α → β → Prop)
[∀ a b, Decidable (s a b)] :=
Primrec₂ fun a b => decide (s a b)
namespace Primrec₂
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ]
theorem mk {f : α → β → σ} (hf : Primrec fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2) : Primrec₂ f := hf
theorem of_eq {f g : α → β → σ} (hg : Primrec₂ f) (H : ∀ a b, f a b = g a b) : Primrec₂ g :=
(by funext a b; apply H : f = g) ▸ hg
theorem const (x : σ) : Primrec₂ fun (_ : α) (_ : β) => x :=
Primrec.const _
protected theorem pair : Primrec₂ (@Prod.mk α β) :=
Primrec.pair .fst .snd
theorem left : Primrec₂ fun (a : α) (_ : β) => a :=
.fst
theorem right : Primrec₂ fun (_ : α) (b : β) => b :=
.snd
theorem natPair : Primrec₂ Nat.pair := by simp [Primrec₂, Primrec]; constructor
theorem unpaired {f : ℕ → ℕ → α} : Primrec (Nat.unpaired f) ↔ Primrec₂ f :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using h.comp natPair, fun h => h.comp Primrec.unpair⟩
theorem unpaired' {f : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ} : Nat.Primrec (Nat.unpaired f) ↔ Primrec₂ f :=
Primrec.nat_iff.symm.trans unpaired
theorem encode_iff {f : α → β → σ} : (Primrec₂ fun a b => encode (f a b)) ↔ Primrec₂ f :=
Primrec.encode_iff
theorem option_some_iff {f : α → β → σ} : (Primrec₂ fun a b => some (f a b)) ↔ Primrec₂ f :=
Primrec.option_some_iff
theorem ofNat_iff {α β σ} [Denumerable α] [Denumerable β] [Primcodable σ] {f : α → β → σ} :
Primrec₂ f ↔ Primrec₂ fun m n : ℕ => f (ofNat α m) (ofNat β n) :=
(Primrec.ofNat_iff.trans <| by simp).trans unpaired
theorem uncurry {f : α → β → σ} : Primrec (Function.uncurry f) ↔ Primrec₂ f := by
rw [show Function.uncurry f = fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2 from funext fun ⟨a, b⟩ => rfl]; rfl
theorem curry {f : α × β → σ} : Primrec₂ (Function.curry f) ↔ Primrec f := by
rw [← uncurry, Function.uncurry_curry]
end Primrec₂
section Comp
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable γ] [Primcodable δ] [Primcodable σ]
theorem Primrec.comp₂ {f : γ → σ} {g : α → β → γ} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec₂ g) :
Primrec₂ fun a b => f (g a b) :=
hf.comp hg
theorem Primrec₂.comp {f : β → γ → σ} {g : α → β} {h : α → γ} (hf : Primrec₂ f) (hg : Primrec g)
(hh : Primrec h) : Primrec fun a => f (g a) (h a) :=
Primrec.comp hf (hg.pair hh)
theorem Primrec₂.comp₂ {f : γ → δ → σ} {g : α → β → γ} {h : α → β → δ} (hf : Primrec₂ f)
(hg : Primrec₂ g) (hh : Primrec₂ h) : Primrec₂ fun a b => f (g a b) (h a b) :=
hf.comp hg hh
theorem PrimrecPred.comp {p : β → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {f : α → β} :
PrimrecPred p → Primrec f → PrimrecPred fun a => p (f a) :=
Primrec.comp
theorem PrimrecRel.comp {R : β → γ → Prop} [∀ a b, Decidable (R a b)] {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} :
PrimrecRel R → Primrec f → Primrec g → PrimrecPred fun a => R (f a) (g a) :=
Primrec₂.comp
theorem PrimrecRel.comp₂ {R : γ → δ → Prop} [∀ a b, Decidable (R a b)] {f : α → β → γ}
{g : α → β → δ} :
PrimrecRel R → Primrec₂ f → Primrec₂ g → PrimrecRel fun a b => R (f a b) (g a b) :=
PrimrecRel.comp
end Comp
theorem PrimrecPred.of_eq {α} [Primcodable α] {p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q]
(hp : PrimrecPred p) (H : ∀ a, p a ↔ q a) : PrimrecPred q :=
Primrec.of_eq hp fun a => Bool.decide_congr (H a)
theorem PrimrecRel.of_eq {α β} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] {r s : α → β → Prop}
[∀ a b, Decidable (r a b)] [∀ a b, Decidable (s a b)] (hr : PrimrecRel r)
(H : ∀ a b, r a b ↔ s a b) : PrimrecRel s :=
Primrec₂.of_eq hr fun a b => Bool.decide_congr (H a b)
namespace Primrec₂
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ]
open Nat.Primrec
theorem swap {f : α → β → σ} (h : Primrec₂ f) : Primrec₂ (swap f) :=
h.comp₂ Primrec₂.right Primrec₂.left
theorem nat_iff {f : α → β → σ} : Primrec₂ f ↔ Nat.Primrec
(.unpaired fun m n => encode <| (@decode α _ m).bind fun a => (@decode β _ n).map (f a)) := by
have :
∀ (a : Option α) (b : Option β),
Option.map (fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2)
(Option.bind a fun a : α => Option.map (Prod.mk a) b) =
Option.bind a fun a => Option.map (f a) b := fun a b => by
cases a <;> cases b <;> rfl
simp [Primrec₂, Primrec, this]
theorem nat_iff' {f : α → β → σ} :
Primrec₂ f ↔
Primrec₂ fun m n : ℕ => (@decode α _ m).bind fun a => Option.map (f a) (@decode β _ n) :=
nat_iff.trans <| unpaired'.trans encode_iff
end Primrec₂
namespace Primrec
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ]
theorem to₂ {f : α × β → σ} (hf : Primrec f) : Primrec₂ fun a b => f (a, b) :=
hf.of_eq fun _ => rfl
theorem nat_rec {f : α → β} {g : α → ℕ × β → β} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec₂ g) :
Primrec₂ fun a (n : ℕ) => n.rec (motive := fun _ => β) (f a) fun n IH => g a (n, IH) :=
Primrec₂.nat_iff.2 <|
((Nat.Primrec.casesOn' .zero <|
(Nat.Primrec.prec hf <|
.comp hg <|
Nat.Primrec.left.pair <|
(Nat.Primrec.left.comp .right).pair <|
Nat.Primrec.pred.comp <| Nat.Primrec.right.comp .right).comp <|
Nat.Primrec.right.pair <| Nat.Primrec.right.comp Nat.Primrec.left).comp <|
Nat.Primrec.id.pair <| (@Primcodable.prim α).comp Nat.Primrec.left).of_eq
fun n => by
simp only [Nat.unpaired, id_eq, Nat.unpair_pair, decode_prod_val, decode_nat,
Option.some_bind, Option.map_map, Option.map_some']
rcases @decode α _ n.unpair.1 with - | a; · rfl
simp only [Nat.pred_eq_sub_one, encode_some, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, encodek, Option.map_some',
Option.some_bind, Option.map_map]
induction' n.unpair.2 with m <;> simp [encodek]
simp [*, encodek]
theorem nat_rec' {f : α → ℕ} {g : α → β} {h : α → ℕ × β → β}
(hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec g) (hh : Primrec₂ h) :
Primrec fun a => (f a).rec (motive := fun _ => β) (g a) fun n IH => h a (n, IH) :=
(nat_rec hg hh).comp .id hf
theorem nat_rec₁ {f : ℕ → α → α} (a : α) (hf : Primrec₂ f) : Primrec (Nat.rec a f) :=
nat_rec' .id (const a) <| comp₂ hf Primrec₂.right
theorem nat_casesOn' {f : α → β} {g : α → ℕ → β} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec₂ g) :
Primrec₂ fun a (n : ℕ) => (n.casesOn (f a) (g a) : β) :=
nat_rec hf <| hg.comp₂ Primrec₂.left <| comp₂ fst Primrec₂.right
theorem nat_casesOn {f : α → ℕ} {g : α → β} {h : α → ℕ → β} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec g)
(hh : Primrec₂ h) : Primrec fun a => ((f a).casesOn (g a) (h a) : β) :=
(nat_casesOn' hg hh).comp .id hf
theorem nat_casesOn₁ {f : ℕ → α} (a : α) (hf : Primrec f) :
Primrec (fun (n : ℕ) => (n.casesOn a f : α)) :=
nat_casesOn .id (const a) (comp₂ hf .right)
theorem nat_iterate {f : α → ℕ} {g : α → β} {h : α → β → β} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec g)
(hh : Primrec₂ h) : Primrec fun a => (h a)^[f a] (g a) :=
(nat_rec' hf hg (hh.comp₂ Primrec₂.left <| snd.comp₂ Primrec₂.right)).of_eq fun a => by
induction f a <;> simp [*, -Function.iterate_succ, Function.iterate_succ']
theorem option_casesOn {o : α → Option β} {f : α → σ} {g : α → β → σ} (ho : Primrec o)
(hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec₂ g) :
@Primrec _ σ _ _ fun a => Option.casesOn (o a) (f a) (g a) :=
encode_iff.1 <|
(nat_casesOn (encode_iff.2 ho) (encode_iff.2 hf) <|
pred.comp₂ <|
Primrec₂.encode_iff.2 <|
(Primrec₂.nat_iff'.1 hg).comp₂ ((@Primrec.encode α _).comp fst).to₂
Primrec₂.right).of_eq
fun a => by rcases o a with - | b <;> simp [encodek]
theorem option_bind {f : α → Option β} {g : α → β → Option σ} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec₂ g) :
Primrec fun a => (f a).bind (g a) :=
(option_casesOn hf (const none) hg).of_eq fun a => by cases f a <;> rfl
theorem option_bind₁ {f : α → Option σ} (hf : Primrec f) : Primrec fun o => Option.bind o f :=
option_bind .id (hf.comp snd).to₂
theorem option_map {f : α → Option β} {g : α → β → σ} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec₂ g) :
Primrec fun a => (f a).map (g a) :=
(option_bind hf (option_some.comp₂ hg)).of_eq fun x => by cases f x <;> rfl
theorem option_map₁ {f : α → σ} (hf : Primrec f) : Primrec (Option.map f) :=
option_map .id (hf.comp snd).to₂
theorem option_iget [Inhabited α] : Primrec (@Option.iget α _) :=
(option_casesOn .id (const <| @default α _) .right).of_eq fun o => by cases o <;> rfl
theorem option_isSome : Primrec (@Option.isSome α) :=
(option_casesOn .id (const false) (const true).to₂).of_eq fun o => by cases o <;> rfl
theorem option_getD : Primrec₂ (@Option.getD α) :=
Primrec.of_eq (option_casesOn Primrec₂.left Primrec₂.right .right) fun ⟨o, a⟩ => by
cases o <;> rfl
theorem bind_decode_iff {f : α → β → Option σ} :
(Primrec₂ fun a n => (@decode β _ n).bind (f a)) ↔ Primrec₂ f :=
⟨fun h => by simpa [encodek] using h.comp fst ((@Primrec.encode β _).comp snd), fun h =>
option_bind (Primrec.decode.comp snd) <| h.comp (fst.comp fst) snd⟩
theorem map_decode_iff {f : α → β → σ} :
(Primrec₂ fun a n => (@decode β _ n).map (f a)) ↔ Primrec₂ f := by
simp only [Option.map_eq_bind]
exact bind_decode_iff.trans Primrec₂.option_some_iff
theorem nat_add : Primrec₂ ((· + ·) : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ) :=
Primrec₂.unpaired'.1 Nat.Primrec.add
theorem nat_sub : Primrec₂ ((· - ·) : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ) :=
Primrec₂.unpaired'.1 Nat.Primrec.sub
theorem nat_mul : Primrec₂ ((· * ·) : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ) :=
Primrec₂.unpaired'.1 Nat.Primrec.mul
theorem cond {c : α → Bool} {f : α → σ} {g : α → σ} (hc : Primrec c) (hf : Primrec f)
(hg : Primrec g) : Primrec fun a => bif (c a) then (f a) else (g a) :=
(nat_casesOn (encode_iff.2 hc) hg (hf.comp fst).to₂).of_eq fun a => by cases c a <;> rfl
theorem ite {c : α → Prop} [DecidablePred c] {f : α → σ} {g : α → σ} (hc : PrimrecPred c)
(hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec g) : Primrec fun a => if c a then f a else g a := by
simpa [Bool.cond_decide] using cond hc hf hg
theorem nat_le : PrimrecRel ((· ≤ ·) : ℕ → ℕ → Prop) :=
(nat_casesOn nat_sub (const true) (const false).to₂).of_eq fun p => by
dsimp [swap]
rcases e : p.1 - p.2 with - | n
· simp [Nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.1 e]
· simp [not_le.2 (Nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ e)]
theorem nat_min : Primrec₂ (@min ℕ _) :=
ite nat_le fst snd
theorem nat_max : Primrec₂ (@max ℕ _) :=
ite (nat_le.comp fst snd) snd fst
theorem dom_bool (f : Bool → α) : Primrec f :=
(cond .id (const (f true)) (const (f false))).of_eq fun b => by cases b <;> rfl
theorem dom_bool₂ (f : Bool → Bool → α) : Primrec₂ f :=
(cond fst ((dom_bool (f true)).comp snd) ((dom_bool (f false)).comp snd)).of_eq fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by
cases a <;> rfl
protected theorem not : Primrec not :=
dom_bool _
protected theorem and : Primrec₂ and :=
dom_bool₂ _
protected theorem or : Primrec₂ or :=
dom_bool₂ _
theorem _root_.PrimrecPred.not {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (hp : PrimrecPred p) :
PrimrecPred fun a => ¬p a :=
(Primrec.not.comp hp).of_eq fun n => by simp
theorem _root_.PrimrecPred.and {p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q]
(hp : PrimrecPred p) (hq : PrimrecPred q) : PrimrecPred fun a => p a ∧ q a :=
(Primrec.and.comp hp hq).of_eq fun n => by simp
theorem _root_.PrimrecPred.or {p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q]
(hp : PrimrecPred p) (hq : PrimrecPred q) : PrimrecPred fun a => p a ∨ q a :=
(Primrec.or.comp hp hq).of_eq fun n => by simp
protected theorem beq [DecidableEq α] : Primrec₂ (@BEq.beq α _) :=
have : PrimrecRel fun a b : ℕ => a = b :=
(PrimrecPred.and nat_le nat_le.swap).of_eq fun a => by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
(this.comp₂ (Primrec.encode.comp₂ Primrec₂.left) (Primrec.encode.comp₂ Primrec₂.right)).of_eq
fun _ _ => encode_injective.eq_iff
protected theorem eq [DecidableEq α] : PrimrecRel (@Eq α) := Primrec.beq
theorem nat_lt : PrimrecRel ((· < ·) : ℕ → ℕ → Prop) :=
(nat_le.comp snd fst).not.of_eq fun p => by simp
theorem option_guard {p : α → β → Prop} [∀ a b, Decidable (p a b)] (hp : PrimrecRel p) {f : α → β}
(hf : Primrec f) : Primrec fun a => Option.guard (p a) (f a) :=
ite (hp.comp Primrec.id hf) (option_some_iff.2 hf) (const none)
theorem option_orElse : Primrec₂ ((· <|> ·) : Option α → Option α → Option α) :=
(option_casesOn fst snd (fst.comp fst).to₂).of_eq fun ⟨o₁, o₂⟩ => by cases o₁ <;> cases o₂ <;> rfl
protected theorem decode₂ : Primrec (decode₂ α) :=
option_bind .decode <|
option_guard (Primrec.beq.comp₂ (by exact encode_iff.mpr snd) (by exact fst.comp fst)) snd
theorem list_findIdx₁ {p : α → β → Bool} (hp : Primrec₂ p) :
∀ l : List β, Primrec fun a => l.findIdx (p a)
| [] => const 0
| a :: l => (cond (hp.comp .id (const a)) (const 0) (succ.comp (list_findIdx₁ hp l))).of_eq fun n =>
by simp [List.findIdx_cons]
theorem list_idxOf₁ [DecidableEq α] (l : List α) : Primrec fun a => l.idxOf a :=
list_findIdx₁ (.swap .beq) l
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias list_indexOf₁ := list_idxOf₁
theorem dom_fintype [Finite α] (f : α → σ) : Primrec f :=
let ⟨l, _, m⟩ := Finite.exists_univ_list α
option_some_iff.1 <| by
haveI := decidableEqOfEncodable α
refine ((list_getElem?₁ (l.map f)).comp (list_idxOf₁ l)).of_eq fun a => ?_
rw [List.getElem?_map, List.getElem?_idxOf (m a), Option.map_some']
-- Porting note: These are new lemmas
-- I added it because it actually simplified the proofs
-- and because I couldn't understand the original proof
/-- A function is `PrimrecBounded` if its size is bounded by a primitive recursive function -/
def PrimrecBounded (f : α → β) : Prop :=
∃ g : α → ℕ, Primrec g ∧ ∀ x, encode (f x) ≤ g x
theorem nat_findGreatest {f : α → ℕ} {p : α → ℕ → Prop} [∀ x n, Decidable (p x n)]
(hf : Primrec f) (hp : PrimrecRel p) : Primrec fun x => (f x).findGreatest (p x) :=
(nat_rec' (h := fun x nih => if p x (nih.1 + 1) then nih.1 + 1 else nih.2)
hf (const 0) (ite (hp.comp fst (snd |> fst.comp |> succ.comp))
(snd |> fst.comp |> succ.comp) (snd.comp snd))).of_eq fun x => by
induction f x <;> simp [Nat.findGreatest, *]
/-- To show a function `f : α → ℕ` is primitive recursive, it is enough to show that the function
is bounded by a primitive recursive function and that its graph is primitive recursive -/
theorem of_graph {f : α → ℕ} (h₁ : PrimrecBounded f)
(h₂ : PrimrecRel fun a b => f a = b) : Primrec f := by
rcases h₁ with ⟨g, pg, hg : ∀ x, f x ≤ g x⟩
refine (nat_findGreatest pg h₂).of_eq fun n => ?_
exact (Nat.findGreatest_spec (P := fun b => f n = b) (hg n) rfl).symm
-- We show that division is primitive recursive by showing that the graph is
theorem nat_div : Primrec₂ ((· / ·) : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ) := by
refine of_graph ⟨_, fst, fun p => Nat.div_le_self _ _⟩ ?_
have : PrimrecRel fun (a : ℕ × ℕ) (b : ℕ) => (a.2 = 0 ∧ b = 0) ∨
(0 < a.2 ∧ b * a.2 ≤ a.1 ∧ a.1 < (b + 1) * a.2) :=
PrimrecPred.or
(.and (const 0 |> Primrec.eq.comp (fst |> snd.comp)) (const 0 |> Primrec.eq.comp snd))
(.and (nat_lt.comp (const 0) (fst |> snd.comp)) <|
.and (nat_le.comp (nat_mul.comp snd (fst |> snd.comp)) (fst |> fst.comp))
(nat_lt.comp (fst.comp fst) (nat_mul.comp (Primrec.succ.comp snd) (snd.comp fst))))
refine this.of_eq ?_
rintro ⟨a, k⟩ q
if H : k = 0 then simp [H, eq_comm]
else
have : q * k ≤ a ∧ a < (q + 1) * k ↔ q = a / k := by
rw [le_antisymm_iff, ← (@Nat.lt_succ _ q), Nat.le_div_iff_mul_le (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero H),
Nat.div_lt_iff_lt_mul (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero H)]
simpa [H, zero_lt_iff, eq_comm (b := q)]
theorem nat_mod : Primrec₂ ((· % ·) : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ) :=
(nat_sub.comp fst (nat_mul.comp snd nat_div)).to₂.of_eq fun m n => by
apply Nat.sub_eq_of_eq_add
simp [add_comm (m % n), Nat.div_add_mod]
theorem nat_bodd : Primrec Nat.bodd :=
(Primrec.beq.comp (nat_mod.comp .id (const 2)) (const 1)).of_eq fun n => by
cases H : n.bodd <;> simp [Nat.mod_two_of_bodd, H]
theorem nat_div2 : Primrec Nat.div2 :=
(nat_div.comp .id (const 2)).of_eq fun n => n.div2_val.symm
theorem nat_double : Primrec (fun n : ℕ => 2 * n) :=
nat_mul.comp (const _) Primrec.id
theorem nat_double_succ : Primrec (fun n : ℕ => 2 * n + 1) :=
nat_double |> Primrec.succ.comp
end Primrec
section
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ]
variable (H : Nat.Primrec fun n => Encodable.encode (@decode (List β) _ n))
open Primrec
private def prim : Primcodable (List β) := ⟨H⟩
private theorem list_casesOn' {f : α → List β} {g : α → σ} {h : α → β × List β → σ}
(hf : haveI := prim H; Primrec f) (hg : Primrec g) (hh : haveI := prim H; Primrec₂ h) :
@Primrec _ σ _ _ fun a => List.casesOn (f a) (g a) fun b l => h a (b, l) :=
letI := prim H
have :
@Primrec _ (Option σ) _ _ fun a =>
(@decode (Option (β × List β)) _ (encode (f a))).map fun o => Option.casesOn o (g a) (h a) :=
((@map_decode_iff _ (Option (β × List β)) _ _ _ _ _).2 <|
to₂ <|
option_casesOn snd (hg.comp fst) (hh.comp₂ (fst.comp₂ Primrec₂.left) Primrec₂.right)).comp
.id (encode_iff.2 hf)
option_some_iff.1 <| this.of_eq fun a => by rcases f a with - | ⟨b, l⟩ <;> simp [encodek]
private theorem list_foldl' {f : α → List β} {g : α → σ} {h : α → σ × β → σ}
(hf : haveI := prim H; Primrec f) (hg : Primrec g) (hh : haveI := prim H; Primrec₂ h) :
Primrec fun a => (f a).foldl (fun s b => h a (s, b)) (g a) := by
letI := prim H
let G (a : α) (IH : σ × List β) : σ × List β := List.casesOn IH.2 IH fun b l => (h a (IH.1, b), l)
have hG : Primrec₂ G := list_casesOn' H (snd.comp snd) snd <|
to₂ <|
pair (hh.comp (fst.comp fst) <| pair ((fst.comp snd).comp fst) (fst.comp snd))
(snd.comp snd)
let F := fun (a : α) (n : ℕ) => (G a)^[n] (g a, f a)
have hF : Primrec fun a => (F a (encode (f a))).1 :=
(fst.comp <|
nat_iterate (encode_iff.2 hf) (pair hg hf) <|
hG)
suffices ∀ a n, F a n = (((f a).take n).foldl (fun s b => h a (s, b)) (g a), (f a).drop n) by
refine hF.of_eq fun a => ?_
rw [this, List.take_of_length_le (length_le_encode _)]
introv
dsimp only [F]
generalize f a = l
generalize g a = x
induction n generalizing l x with
| zero => rfl
| succ n IH =>
simp only [iterate_succ, comp_apply]
rcases l with - | ⟨b, l⟩ <;> simp [G, IH]
private theorem list_cons' : (haveI := prim H; Primrec₂ (@List.cons β)) :=
letI := prim H
encode_iff.1 (succ.comp <| Primrec₂.natPair.comp (encode_iff.2 fst) (encode_iff.2 snd))
private theorem list_reverse' :
haveI := prim H
Primrec (@List.reverse β) :=
letI := prim H
(list_foldl' H .id (const []) <| to₂ <| ((list_cons' H).comp snd fst).comp snd).of_eq
(suffices ∀ l r, List.foldl (fun (s : List β) (b : β) => b :: s) r l = List.reverseAux l r from
fun l => this l []
fun l => by induction l <;> simp [*, List.reverseAux])
end
namespace Primcodable
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β]
open Primrec
instance sum : Primcodable (α ⊕ β) :=
⟨Primrec.nat_iff.1 <|
(encode_iff.2
(cond nat_bodd
(((@Primrec.decode β _).comp nat_div2).option_map <|
to₂ <| nat_double_succ.comp (Primrec.encode.comp snd))
(((@Primrec.decode α _).comp nat_div2).option_map <|
to₂ <| nat_double.comp (Primrec.encode.comp snd)))).of_eq
fun n =>
show _ = encode (decodeSum n) by
simp only [decodeSum, Nat.boddDiv2_eq]
cases Nat.bodd n <;> simp [decodeSum]
· cases @decode α _ n.div2 <;> rfl
· cases @decode β _ n.div2 <;> rfl⟩
instance list : Primcodable (List α) :=
⟨letI H := @Primcodable.prim (List ℕ) _
have : Primrec₂ fun (a : α) (o : Option (List ℕ)) => o.map (List.cons (encode a)) :=
option_map snd <| (list_cons' H).comp ((@Primrec.encode α _).comp (fst.comp fst)) snd
have :
Primrec fun n =>
(ofNat (List ℕ) n).reverse.foldl
(fun o m => (@decode α _ m).bind fun a => o.map (List.cons (encode a))) (some []) :=
list_foldl' H ((list_reverse' H).comp (.ofNat (List ℕ))) (const (some []))
(Primrec.comp₂ (bind_decode_iff.2 <| .swap this) Primrec₂.right)
nat_iff.1 <|
(encode_iff.2 this).of_eq fun n => by
rw [List.foldl_reverse]
apply Nat.case_strong_induction_on n; · simp
intro n IH; simp
rcases @decode α _ n.unpair.1 with - | a; · rfl
simp only [decode_eq_ofNat, Option.some.injEq, Option.some_bind, Option.map_some']
suffices ∀ (o : Option (List ℕ)) (p), encode o = encode p →
encode (Option.map (List.cons (encode a)) o) = encode (Option.map (List.cons a) p) from
this _ _ (IH _ (Nat.unpair_right_le n))
intro o p IH
cases o <;> cases p
· rfl
· injection IH
· injection IH
· exact congr_arg (fun k => (Nat.pair (encode a) k).succ.succ) (Nat.succ.inj IH)⟩
end Primcodable
namespace Primrec
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable γ] [Primcodable σ]
theorem sumInl : Primrec (@Sum.inl α β) :=
encode_iff.1 <| nat_double.comp Primrec.encode
theorem sumInr : Primrec (@Sum.inr α β) :=
encode_iff.1 <| nat_double_succ.comp Primrec.encode
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")] alias sum_inl := Primrec.sumInl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")] alias sum_inr := Primrec.sumInr
theorem sumCasesOn {f : α → β ⊕ γ} {g : α → β → σ} {h : α → γ → σ} (hf : Primrec f)
(hg : Primrec₂ g) (hh : Primrec₂ h) : @Primrec _ σ _ _ fun a => Sum.casesOn (f a) (g a) (h a) :=
option_some_iff.1 <|
(cond (nat_bodd.comp <| encode_iff.2 hf)
(option_map (Primrec.decode.comp <| nat_div2.comp <| encode_iff.2 hf) hh)
(option_map (Primrec.decode.comp <| nat_div2.comp <| encode_iff.2 hf) hg)).of_eq
fun a => by rcases f a with b | c <;> simp [Nat.div2_val, encodek]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")] alias sum_casesOn := Primrec.sumCasesOn
theorem list_cons : Primrec₂ (@List.cons α) :=
list_cons' Primcodable.prim
theorem list_casesOn {f : α → List β} {g : α → σ} {h : α → β × List β → σ} :
Primrec f →
Primrec g →
Primrec₂ h → @Primrec _ σ _ _ fun a => List.casesOn (f a) (g a) fun b l => h a (b, l) :=
list_casesOn' Primcodable.prim
theorem list_foldl {f : α → List β} {g : α → σ} {h : α → σ × β → σ} :
Primrec f →
Primrec g → Primrec₂ h → Primrec fun a => (f a).foldl (fun s b => h a (s, b)) (g a) :=
list_foldl' Primcodable.prim
theorem list_reverse : Primrec (@List.reverse α) :=
list_reverse' Primcodable.prim
theorem list_foldr {f : α → List β} {g : α → σ} {h : α → β × σ → σ} (hf : Primrec f)
(hg : Primrec g) (hh : Primrec₂ h) :
Primrec fun a => (f a).foldr (fun b s => h a (b, s)) (g a) :=
(list_foldl (list_reverse.comp hf) hg <| to₂ <| hh.comp fst <| (pair snd fst).comp snd).of_eq
fun a => by simp [List.foldl_reverse]
theorem list_head? : Primrec (@List.head? α) :=
(list_casesOn .id (const none) (option_some_iff.2 <| fst.comp snd).to₂).of_eq fun l => by
cases l <;> rfl
theorem list_headI [Inhabited α] : Primrec (@List.headI α _) :=
(option_iget.comp list_head?).of_eq fun l => l.head!_eq_head?.symm
theorem list_tail : Primrec (@List.tail α) :=
(list_casesOn .id (const []) (snd.comp snd).to₂).of_eq fun l => by cases l <;> rfl
theorem list_rec {f : α → List β} {g : α → σ} {h : α → β × List β × σ → σ} (hf : Primrec f)
(hg : Primrec g) (hh : Primrec₂ h) :
@Primrec _ σ _ _ fun a => List.recOn (f a) (g a) fun b l IH => h a (b, l, IH) :=
let F (a : α) := (f a).foldr (fun (b : β) (s : List β × σ) => (b :: s.1, h a (b, s))) ([], g a)
have : Primrec F :=
list_foldr hf (pair (const []) hg) <|
to₂ <| pair ((list_cons.comp fst (fst.comp snd)).comp snd) hh
(snd.comp this).of_eq fun a => by
suffices F a = (f a, List.recOn (f a) (g a) fun b l IH => h a (b, l, IH)) by rw [this]
dsimp [F]
induction' f a with b l IH <;> simp [*]
theorem list_getElem? : Primrec₂ ((·[·]? : List α → ℕ → Option α)) :=
let F (l : List α) (n : ℕ) :=
l.foldl
(fun (s : ℕ ⊕ α) (a : α) =>
Sum.casesOn s (@Nat.casesOn (fun _ => ℕ ⊕ α) · (Sum.inr a) Sum.inl) Sum.inr)
(Sum.inl n)
have hF : Primrec₂ F :=
(list_foldl fst (sumInl.comp snd)
((sumCasesOn fst (nat_casesOn snd (sumInr.comp <| snd.comp fst) (sumInl.comp snd).to₂).to₂
(sumInr.comp snd).to₂).comp
snd).to₂).to₂
have :
@Primrec _ (Option α) _ _ fun p : List α × ℕ => Sum.casesOn (F p.1 p.2) (fun _ => none) some :=
sumCasesOn hF (const none).to₂ (option_some.comp snd).to₂
this.to₂.of_eq fun l n => by
dsimp; symm
induction' l with a l IH generalizing n; · rfl
rcases n with - | n
· dsimp [F]
clear IH
induction' l with _ l IH <;> simp_all
· simpa using IH ..
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-14")] alias list_get? := list_getElem?
theorem list_getD (d : α) : Primrec₂ fun l n => List.getD l n d := by
simp only [List.getD_eq_getElem?_getD]
exact option_getD.comp₂ list_getElem? (const _)
theorem list_getI [Inhabited α] : Primrec₂ (@List.getI α _) :=
list_getD _
theorem list_append : Primrec₂ ((· ++ ·) : List α → List α → List α) :=
(list_foldr fst snd <| to₂ <| comp (@list_cons α _) snd).to₂.of_eq fun l₁ l₂ => by
induction l₁ <;> simp [*]
theorem list_concat : Primrec₂ fun l (a : α) => l ++ [a] :=
list_append.comp fst (list_cons.comp snd (const []))
theorem list_map {f : α → List β} {g : α → β → σ} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec₂ g) :
Primrec fun a => (f a).map (g a) :=
(list_foldr hf (const []) <|
to₂ <| list_cons.comp (hg.comp fst (fst.comp snd)) (snd.comp snd)).of_eq
fun a => by induction f a <;> simp [*]
theorem list_range : Primrec List.range :=
(nat_rec' .id (const []) ((list_concat.comp snd fst).comp snd).to₂).of_eq fun n => by
simp; induction n <;> simp [*, List.range_succ]
theorem list_flatten : Primrec (@List.flatten α) :=
(list_foldr .id (const []) <| to₂ <| comp (@list_append α _) snd).of_eq fun l => by
dsimp; induction l <;> simp [*]
theorem list_flatMap {f : α → List β} {g : α → β → List σ} (hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec₂ g) :
Primrec (fun a => (f a).flatMap (g a)) := list_flatten.comp (list_map hf hg)
theorem optionToList : Primrec (Option.toList : Option α → List α) :=
(option_casesOn Primrec.id (const [])
((list_cons.comp Primrec.id (const [])).comp₂ Primrec₂.right)).of_eq
(fun o => by rcases o <;> simp)
theorem listFilterMap {f : α → List β} {g : α → β → Option σ}
(hf : Primrec f) (hg : Primrec₂ g) : Primrec fun a => (f a).filterMap (g a) :=
(list_flatMap hf (comp₂ optionToList hg)).of_eq
fun _ ↦ Eq.symm <| List.filterMap_eq_flatMap_toList _ _
theorem list_length : Primrec (@List.length α) :=
(list_foldr (@Primrec.id (List α) _) (const 0) <| to₂ <| (succ.comp <| snd.comp snd).to₂).of_eq
fun l => by dsimp; induction l <;> simp [*]
theorem list_findIdx {f : α → List β} {p : α → β → Bool}
(hf : Primrec f) (hp : Primrec₂ p) : Primrec fun a => (f a).findIdx (p a) :=
(list_foldr hf (const 0) <|
to₂ <| cond (hp.comp fst <| fst.comp snd) (const 0) (succ.comp <| snd.comp snd)).of_eq
fun a => by dsimp; induction f a <;> simp [List.findIdx_cons, *]
theorem list_idxOf [DecidableEq α] : Primrec₂ (@List.idxOf α _) :=
to₂ <| list_findIdx snd <| Primrec.beq.comp₂ snd.to₂ (fst.comp fst).to₂
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias list_indexOf := list_idxOf
theorem nat_strong_rec (f : α → ℕ → σ) {g : α → List σ → Option σ} (hg : Primrec₂ g)
(H : ∀ a n, g a ((List.range n).map (f a)) = some (f a n)) : Primrec₂ f :=
suffices Primrec₂ fun a n => (List.range n).map (f a) from
Primrec₂.option_some_iff.1 <|
(list_getElem?.comp (this.comp fst (succ.comp snd)) snd).to₂.of_eq fun a n => by
simp [List.getElem?_range (Nat.lt_succ_self n)]
Primrec₂.option_some_iff.1 <|
(nat_rec (const (some []))
(to₂ <|
option_bind (snd.comp snd) <|
to₂ <|
option_map (hg.comp (fst.comp fst) snd)
(to₂ <| list_concat.comp (snd.comp fst) snd))).of_eq
fun a n => by
induction n with
| zero => rfl
| succ n IH => simp [IH, H, List.range_succ]
theorem listLookup [DecidableEq α] : Primrec₂ (List.lookup : α → List (α × β) → Option β) :=
(to₂ <| list_rec snd (const none) <|
to₂ <|
cond (Primrec.beq.comp (fst.comp fst) (fst.comp <| fst.comp snd))
(option_some.comp <| snd.comp <| fst.comp snd)
(snd.comp <| snd.comp snd)).of_eq
fun a ps => by
induction' ps with p ps ih <;> simp [List.lookup, *]
cases ha : a == p.1 <;> simp [ha]
theorem nat_omega_rec' (f : β → σ) {m : β → ℕ} {l : β → List β} {g : β → List σ → Option σ}
(hm : Primrec m) (hl : Primrec l) (hg : Primrec₂ g)
(Ord : ∀ b, ∀ b' ∈ l b, m b' < m b)
(H : ∀ b, g b ((l b).map f) = some (f b)) : Primrec f := by
haveI : DecidableEq β := Encodable.decidableEqOfEncodable β
let mapGraph (M : List (β × σ)) (bs : List β) : List σ := bs.flatMap (Option.toList <| M.lookup ·)
let bindList (b : β) : ℕ → List β := fun n ↦ n.rec [b] fun _ bs ↦ bs.flatMap l
let graph (b : β) : ℕ → List (β × σ) := fun i ↦ i.rec [] fun i ih ↦
(bindList b (m b - i)).filterMap fun b' ↦ (g b' <| mapGraph ih (l b')).map (b', ·)
have mapGraph_primrec : Primrec₂ mapGraph :=
to₂ <| list_flatMap snd <| optionToList.comp₂ <| listLookup.comp₂ .right (fst.comp₂ .left)
have bindList_primrec : Primrec₂ (bindList) :=
nat_rec' snd
(list_cons.comp fst (const []))
(to₂ <| list_flatMap (snd.comp snd) (hl.comp₂ .right))
have graph_primrec : Primrec₂ (graph) :=
to₂ <| nat_rec' snd (const []) <|
to₂ <| listFilterMap
(bindList_primrec.comp
(fst.comp fst)
(nat_sub.comp (hm.comp <| fst.comp fst) (fst.comp snd))) <|
to₂ <| option_map
(hg.comp snd (mapGraph_primrec.comp (snd.comp <| snd.comp fst) (hl.comp snd)))
(Primrec₂.pair.comp₂ (snd.comp₂ .left) .right)
have : Primrec (fun b => (graph b (m b + 1))[0]?.map Prod.snd) :=
option_map (list_getElem?.comp (graph_primrec.comp Primrec.id (succ.comp hm)) (const 0))
(snd.comp₂ Primrec₂.right)
exact option_some_iff.mp <| this.of_eq <| fun b ↦ by
have graph_eq_map_bindList (i : ℕ) (hi : i ≤ m b + 1) :
graph b i = (bindList b (m b + 1 - i)).map fun x ↦ (x, f x) := by
have bindList_eq_nil : bindList b (m b + 1) = [] :=
have bindList_m_lt (k : ℕ) : ∀ b' ∈ bindList b k, m b' < m b + 1 - k := by
induction' k with k ih <;> simp [bindList]
intro a₂ a₁ ha₁ ha₂
have : k ≤ m b :=
Nat.lt_succ.mp (by simpa using Nat.add_lt_of_lt_sub <| Nat.zero_lt_of_lt (ih a₁ ha₁))
have : m a₁ ≤ m b - k :=
Nat.lt_succ.mp (by rw [← Nat.succ_sub this]; simpa using ih a₁ ha₁)
exact lt_of_lt_of_le (Ord a₁ a₂ ha₂) this
List.eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr
(by intro b' ha'; by_contra; simpa using bindList_m_lt (m b + 1) b' ha')
have mapGraph_graph {bs bs' : List β} (has : bs' ⊆ bs) :
mapGraph (bs.map <| fun x => (x, f x)) bs' = bs'.map f := by
induction' bs' with b bs' ih <;> simp [mapGraph]
· have : b ∈ bs ∧ bs' ⊆ bs := by simpa using has
rcases this with ⟨ha, has'⟩
simpa [List.lookup_graph f ha] using ih has'
have graph_succ : ∀ i, graph b (i + 1) =
(bindList b (m b - i)).filterMap fun b' =>
(g b' <| mapGraph (graph b i) (l b')).map (b', ·) := fun _ => rfl
have bindList_succ : ∀ i, bindList b (i + 1) = (bindList b i).flatMap l := fun _ => rfl
induction' i with i ih
· symm; simpa [graph] using bindList_eq_nil
· simp only [graph_succ, ih (Nat.le_of_lt hi), Nat.succ_sub (Nat.lt_succ.mp hi),
Nat.succ_eq_add_one, bindList_succ, Nat.reduceSubDiff]
apply List.filterMap_eq_map_iff_forall_eq_some.mpr
intro b' ha'; simp; rw [mapGraph_graph]
· exact H b'
· exact (List.infix_flatMap_of_mem ha' l).subset
simp [graph_eq_map_bindList (m b + 1) (Nat.le_refl _), bindList]
theorem nat_omega_rec (f : α → β → σ) {m : α → β → ℕ}
{l : α → β → List β} {g : α → β × List σ → Option σ}
(hm : Primrec₂ m) (hl : Primrec₂ l) (hg : Primrec₂ g)
(Ord : ∀ a b, ∀ b' ∈ l a b, m a b' < m a b)
(H : ∀ a b, g a (b, (l a b).map (f a)) = some (f a b)) : Primrec₂ f :=
Primrec₂.uncurry.mp <|
nat_omega_rec' (Function.uncurry f)
(Primrec₂.uncurry.mpr hm)
(list_map (hl.comp fst snd) (Primrec₂.pair.comp₂ (fst.comp₂ .left) .right))
(hg.comp₂ (fst.comp₂ .left) (Primrec₂.pair.comp₂ (snd.comp₂ .left) .right))
(by simpa using Ord) (by simpa [Function.comp] using H)
end Primrec
namespace Primcodable
variable {α : Type*} [Primcodable α]
open Primrec
/-- A subtype of a primitive recursive predicate is `Primcodable`. -/
def subtype {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (hp : PrimrecPred p) : Primcodable (Subtype p) :=
⟨have : Primrec fun n => (@decode α _ n).bind fun a => Option.guard p a :=
option_bind .decode (option_guard (hp.comp snd).to₂ snd)
nat_iff.1 <| (encode_iff.2 this).of_eq fun n =>
show _ = encode ((@decode α _ n).bind fun _ => _) by
rcases @decode α _ n with - | a; · rfl
dsimp [Option.guard]
by_cases h : p a <;> simp [h]; rfl⟩
instance fin {n} : Primcodable (Fin n) :=
@ofEquiv _ _ (subtype <| nat_lt.comp .id (const n)) Fin.equivSubtype
instance vector {n} : Primcodable (List.Vector α n) :=
subtype ((@Primrec.eq ℕ _ _).comp list_length (const _))
instance finArrow {n} : Primcodable (Fin n → α) :=
ofEquiv _ (Equiv.vectorEquivFin _ _).symm
section ULower
attribute [local instance] Encodable.decidableRangeEncode Encodable.decidableEqOfEncodable
theorem mem_range_encode : PrimrecPred (fun n => n ∈ Set.range (encode : α → ℕ)) :=
have : PrimrecPred fun n => Encodable.decode₂ α n ≠ none :=
.not
(Primrec.eq.comp
(.option_bind .decode
(.ite (Primrec.eq.comp (Primrec.encode.comp .snd) .fst)
(Primrec.option_some.comp .snd) (.const _)))
(.const _))
this.of_eq fun _ => decode₂_ne_none_iff
instance ulower : Primcodable (ULower α) :=
Primcodable.subtype mem_range_encode
end ULower
end Primcodable
namespace Primrec
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ]
theorem subtype_val {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {hp : PrimrecPred p} :
haveI := Primcodable.subtype hp
Primrec (@Subtype.val α p) := by
letI := Primcodable.subtype hp
refine (@Primcodable.prim (Subtype p)).of_eq fun n => ?_
rcases @decode (Subtype p) _ n with (_ | ⟨a, h⟩) <;> rfl
theorem subtype_val_iff {p : β → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {hp : PrimrecPred p} {f : α → Subtype p} :
haveI := Primcodable.subtype hp
(Primrec fun a => (f a).1) ↔ Primrec f := by
| letI := Primcodable.subtype hp
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun hf => subtype_val.comp hf⟩
refine Nat.Primrec.of_eq h fun n => ?_
rcases @decode α _ n with - | a; · rfl
simp; rfl
theorem subtype_mk {p : β → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {hp : PrimrecPred p} {f : α → β}
{h : ∀ a, p (f a)} (hf : Primrec f) :
haveI := Primcodable.subtype hp
Primrec fun a => @Subtype.mk β p (f a) (h a) :=
subtype_val_iff.1 hf
theorem option_get {f : α → Option β} {h : ∀ a, (f a).isSome} :
Primrec f → Primrec fun a => (f a).get (h a) := by
intro hf
refine (Nat.Primrec.pred.comp hf).of_eq fun n => ?_
| Mathlib/Computability/Primrec.lean | 1,148 | 1,163 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Hom.Ring
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Basic
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Basic
/-!
# Conversion between `Cardinal` and `ℕ∞`
In this file we define a coercion `Cardinal.ofENat : ℕ∞ → Cardinal`
and a projection `Cardinal.toENat : Cardinal →+*o ℕ∞`.
We also prove basic theorems about these definitions.
## Implementation notes
We define `Cardinal.ofENat` as a function instead of a bundled homomorphism
so that we can use it as a coercion and delaborate its application to `↑n`.
We define `Cardinal.toENat` as a bundled homomorphism
so that we can use all the theorems about homomorphisms without specializing them to this function.
Since it is not registered as a coercion, the argument about delaboration does not apply.
## Keywords
set theory, cardinals, extended natural numbers
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Function Set
universe u v
namespace Cardinal
/-- Coercion `ℕ∞ → Cardinal`. It sends natural numbers to natural numbers and `⊤` to `ℵ₀`.
See also `Cardinal.ofENatHom` for a bundled homomorphism version. -/
@[coe] def ofENat : ℕ∞ → Cardinal
| (n : ℕ) => n
| ⊤ => ℵ₀
instance : Coe ENat Cardinal := ⟨Cardinal.ofENat⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ofENat_top : ofENat ⊤ = ℵ₀ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ofENat_nat (n : ℕ) : ofENat n = n := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ofENat_zero : ofENat 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ofENat_one : ofENat 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ofENat_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
((ofNat(n) : ℕ∞) : Cardinal) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
rfl
lemma ofENat_strictMono : StrictMono ofENat :=
WithTop.strictMono_iff.2 ⟨Nat.strictMono_cast, nat_lt_aleph0⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma ofENat_lt_ofENat {m n : ℕ∞} : (m : Cardinal) < n ↔ m < n :=
ofENat_strictMono.lt_iff_lt
@[gcongr, mono] alias ⟨_, ofENat_lt_ofENat_of_lt⟩ := ofENat_lt_ofENat
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma ofENat_lt_aleph0 {m : ℕ∞} : (m : Cardinal) < ℵ₀ ↔ m < ⊤ :=
ofENat_lt_ofENat (n := ⊤)
@[simp] lemma ofENat_lt_nat {m : ℕ∞} {n : ℕ} : ofENat m < n ↔ m < n := by norm_cast
@[simp] lemma ofENat_lt_ofNat {m : ℕ∞} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
ofENat m < ofNat(n) ↔ m < OfNat.ofNat n := ofENat_lt_nat
@[simp] lemma nat_lt_ofENat {m : ℕ} {n : ℕ∞} : (m : Cardinal) < n ↔ m < n := by norm_cast
@[simp] lemma ofENat_pos {m : ℕ∞} : 0 < (m : Cardinal) ↔ 0 < m := by norm_cast
@[simp] lemma one_lt_ofENat {m : ℕ∞} : 1 < (m : Cardinal) ↔ 1 < m := by norm_cast
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ofNat_lt_ofENat {m : ℕ} [m.AtLeastTwo] {n : ℕ∞} :
(ofNat(m) : Cardinal) < n ↔ OfNat.ofNat m < n := nat_lt_ofENat
lemma ofENat_mono : Monotone ofENat := ofENat_strictMono.monotone
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma ofENat_le_ofENat {m n : ℕ∞} : (m : Cardinal) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := ofENat_strictMono.le_iff_le
@[gcongr, mono] alias ⟨_, ofENat_le_ofENat_of_le⟩ := ofENat_le_ofENat
@[simp] lemma ofENat_le_aleph0 (n : ℕ∞) : ↑n ≤ ℵ₀ := ofENat_le_ofENat.2 le_top
@[simp] lemma ofENat_le_nat {m : ℕ∞} {n : ℕ} : ofENat m ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by norm_cast
@[simp] lemma ofENat_le_one {m : ℕ∞} : ofENat m ≤ 1 ↔ m ≤ 1 := by norm_cast
@[simp] lemma ofENat_le_ofNat {m : ℕ∞} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
ofENat m ≤ ofNat(n) ↔ m ≤ OfNat.ofNat n := ofENat_le_nat
@[simp] lemma nat_le_ofENat {m : ℕ} {n : ℕ∞} : (m : Cardinal) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by norm_cast
@[simp] lemma one_le_ofENat {n : ℕ∞} : 1 ≤ (n : Cardinal) ↔ 1 ≤ n := by norm_cast
@[simp]
lemma ofNat_le_ofENat {m : ℕ} [m.AtLeastTwo] {n : ℕ∞} :
(ofNat(m) : Cardinal) ≤ n ↔ OfNat.ofNat m ≤ n := nat_le_ofENat
lemma ofENat_injective : Injective ofENat := ofENat_strictMono.injective
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma ofENat_inj {m n : ℕ∞} : (m : Cardinal) = n ↔ m = n := ofENat_injective.eq_iff
@[simp] lemma ofENat_eq_nat {m : ℕ∞} {n : ℕ} : (m : Cardinal) = n ↔ m = n := by norm_cast
@[simp] lemma nat_eq_ofENat {m : ℕ} {n : ℕ∞} : (m : Cardinal) = n ↔ m = n := by norm_cast
@[simp] lemma ofENat_eq_zero {m : ℕ∞} : (m : Cardinal) = 0 ↔ m = 0 := by norm_cast
@[simp] lemma zero_eq_ofENat {m : ℕ∞} : 0 = (m : Cardinal) ↔ m = 0 := by norm_cast; apply eq_comm
@[simp] lemma ofENat_eq_one {m : ℕ∞} : (m : Cardinal) = 1 ↔ m = 1 := by norm_cast
@[simp] lemma one_eq_ofENat {m : ℕ∞} : 1 = (m : Cardinal) ↔ m = 1 := by norm_cast; apply eq_comm
@[simp] lemma ofENat_eq_ofNat {m : ℕ∞} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
(m : Cardinal) = ofNat(n) ↔ m = OfNat.ofNat n := ofENat_eq_nat
@[simp] lemma ofNat_eq_ofENat {m : ℕ} {n : ℕ∞} [m.AtLeastTwo] :
ofNat(m) = (n : Cardinal) ↔ OfNat.ofNat m = n := nat_eq_ofENat
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma lift_ofENat : ∀ m : ℕ∞, lift.{u, v} m = m
| (m : ℕ) => lift_natCast m
| ⊤ => lift_aleph0
@[simp] lemma lift_lt_ofENat {x : Cardinal.{v}} {m : ℕ∞} : lift.{u} x < m ↔ x < m := by
rw [← lift_ofENat.{u, v}, lift_lt]
@[simp] lemma lift_le_ofENat {x : Cardinal.{v}} {m : ℕ∞} : lift.{u} x ≤ m ↔ x ≤ m := by
rw [← lift_ofENat.{u, v}, lift_le]
@[simp] lemma lift_eq_ofENat {x : Cardinal.{v}} {m : ℕ∞} : lift.{u} x = m ↔ x = m := by
rw [← lift_ofENat.{u, v}, lift_inj]
@[simp] lemma ofENat_lt_lift {x : Cardinal.{v}} {m : ℕ∞} : m < lift.{u} x ↔ m < x := by
rw [← lift_ofENat.{u, v}, lift_lt]
@[simp] lemma ofENat_le_lift {x : Cardinal.{v}} {m : ℕ∞} : m ≤ lift.{u} x ↔ m ≤ x := by
rw [← lift_ofENat.{u, v}, lift_le]
@[simp] lemma ofENat_eq_lift {x : Cardinal.{v}} {m : ℕ∞} : m = lift.{u} x ↔ m = x := by
rw [← lift_ofENat.{u, v}, lift_inj]
@[simp]
lemma range_ofENat : range ofENat = Iic ℵ₀ := by
refine (range_subset_iff.2 ofENat_le_aleph0).antisymm fun x (hx : x ≤ ℵ₀) ↦ ?_
rcases hx.lt_or_eq with hlt | rfl
· lift x to ℕ using hlt
exact mem_range_self (x : ℕ∞)
· exact mem_range_self (⊤ : ℕ∞)
instance : CanLift Cardinal ℕ∞ (↑) (· ≤ ℵ₀) where
prf x := (Set.ext_iff.1 range_ofENat x).2
/-- Unbundled version of `Cardinal.toENat`. -/
noncomputable def toENatAux : Cardinal.{u} → ℕ∞ := extend Nat.cast Nat.cast fun _ ↦ ⊤
lemma toENatAux_nat (n : ℕ) : toENatAux n = n := Nat.cast_injective.extend_apply ..
lemma toENatAux_zero : toENatAux 0 = 0 := toENatAux_nat 0
lemma toENatAux_eq_top {a : Cardinal} (ha : ℵ₀ ≤ a) : toENatAux a = ⊤ :=
extend_apply' _ _ _ fun ⟨n, hn⟩ ↦ ha.not_lt <| hn ▸ nat_lt_aleph0 n
lemma toENatAux_ofENat : ∀ n : ℕ∞, toENatAux n = n
| (n : ℕ) => toENatAux_nat n
| ⊤ => toENatAux_eq_top le_rfl
attribute [local simp] toENatAux_nat toENatAux_zero toENatAux_ofENat
lemma toENatAux_gc : GaloisConnection (↑) toENatAux := fun n x ↦ by
cases lt_or_le x ℵ₀ with
| inl hx => lift x to ℕ using hx; simp
| | inr hx => simp [toENatAux_eq_top hx, (ofENat_le_aleph0 n).trans hx]
theorem toENatAux_le_nat {x : Cardinal} {n : ℕ} : toENatAux x ≤ n ↔ x ≤ n := by
cases lt_or_le x ℵ₀ with
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/ENat.lean | 173 | 176 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Fin
import Mathlib.Data.Vector.Basic
/-!
# The structure of `Fintype (Fin n)`
This file contains some basic results about the `Fintype` instance for `Fin`,
especially properties of `Finset.univ : Finset (Fin n)`.
-/
open List (Vector)
open Finset
open Fintype
namespace Fin
variable {α β : Type*} {n : ℕ}
|
theorem map_valEmbedding_univ : (Finset.univ : Finset (Fin n)).map Fin.valEmbedding = Iio n := by
ext
| Mathlib/Data/Fintype/Fin.lean | 25 | 27 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FiniteStability
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Nilpotent
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Kaehler.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Away.AdjoinRoot
/-!
# Unramified morphisms
An `R`-algebra `A` is formally unramified if `Ω[A⁄R]` is trivial.
This is equivalent to the standard definition "for every `R`-algebra,
every square-zero ideal `I : Ideal B` and `f : A →ₐ[R] B ⧸ I`, there exists
at most one lift `A →ₐ[R] B`".
It is unramified if it is formally unramified and of finite type.
Note that there are multiple definitions in the literature. The definition we give is equivalent to
the one in the Stacks Project https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00US. Note that in EGA unramified
is defined as formally unramified and of finite presentation.
We show that the property extends onto nilpotent ideals, and that it is stable
under `R`-algebra homomorphisms and compositions.
We show that unramified is stable under algebra isomorphisms, composition and
localization at an element.
-/
-- Porting note: added to make the syntax work below.
open scoped TensorProduct
universe u v w
namespace Algebra
section
variable (R : Type v) (A : Type u) [CommRing R] [CommRing A] [Algebra R A]
/--
An `R`-algebra `A` is formally unramified if `Ω[A⁄R]` is trivial.
This is equivalent to "for every `R`-algebra, every square-zero ideal
`I : Ideal B` and `f : A →ₐ[R] B ⧸ I`, there exists at most one lift `A →ₐ[R] B`".
See `Algebra.FormallyUnramified.iff_comp_injective`. -/
@[mk_iff, stacks 00UM]
class FormallyUnramified : Prop where
subsingleton_kaehlerDifferential : Subsingleton (Ω[A⁄R])
attribute [instance] FormallyUnramified.subsingleton_kaehlerDifferential
end
namespace FormallyUnramified
section
variable {R : Type v} [CommRing R]
variable {A : Type u} [CommRing A] [Algebra R A]
variable {B : Type w} [CommRing B] [Algebra R B] (I : Ideal B)
theorem comp_injective [FormallyUnramified R A] (hI : I ^ 2 = ⊥) :
Function.Injective ((Ideal.Quotient.mkₐ R I).comp : (A →ₐ[R] B) → A →ₐ[R] B ⧸ I) := by
intro f₁ f₂ e
letI := f₁.toRingHom.toAlgebra
haveI := IsScalarTower.of_algebraMap_eq' f₁.comp_algebraMap.symm
have :=
((KaehlerDifferential.linearMapEquivDerivation R A).toEquiv.trans
(derivationToSquareZeroEquivLift I hI)).surjective.subsingleton
exact Subtype.ext_iff.mp (@Subsingleton.elim _ this ⟨f₁, rfl⟩ ⟨f₂, e.symm⟩)
theorem iff_comp_injective :
FormallyUnramified R A ↔
∀ ⦃B : Type u⦄ [CommRing B],
∀ [Algebra R B] (I : Ideal B) (_ : I ^ 2 = ⊥),
Function.Injective ((Ideal.Quotient.mkₐ R I).comp : (A →ₐ[R] B) → A →ₐ[R] B ⧸ I) := by
constructor
· intros; exact comp_injective _ ‹_›
· intro H
constructor
rw [← not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton]
intro h
obtain ⟨f₁, f₂, e⟩ := (KaehlerDifferential.endEquiv R A).injective.nontrivial
apply e
ext1
refine H
(RingHom.ker (TensorProduct.lmul' R (S := A)).kerSquareLift.toRingHom) ?_ ?_
· rw [AlgHom.ker_kerSquareLift]
exact Ideal.cotangentIdeal_square _
· ext x
apply RingHom.kerLift_injective (TensorProduct.lmul' R (S := A)).kerSquareLift.toRingHom
simpa using DFunLike.congr_fun (f₁.2.trans f₂.2.symm) x
theorem lift_unique
[FormallyUnramified R A] (I : Ideal B) (hI : IsNilpotent I) (g₁ g₂ : A →ₐ[R] B)
(h : (Ideal.Quotient.mkₐ R I).comp g₁ = (Ideal.Quotient.mkₐ R I).comp g₂) : g₁ = g₂ := by
revert g₁ g₂
change Function.Injective (Ideal.Quotient.mkₐ R I).comp
revert ‹Algebra R B›
apply Ideal.IsNilpotent.induction_on (S := B) I hI
· intro B _ I hI _; exact FormallyUnramified.comp_injective I hI
· intro B _ I J hIJ h₁ h₂ _ g₁ g₂ e
apply h₁
apply h₂
ext x
replace e := AlgHom.congr_fun e x
dsimp only [AlgHom.comp_apply, Ideal.Quotient.mkₐ_eq_mk] at e ⊢
rwa [Ideal.Quotient.eq, ← map_sub, Ideal.mem_quotient_iff_mem hIJ, ← Ideal.Quotient.eq]
theorem ext [FormallyUnramified R A] (hI : IsNilpotent I) {g₁ g₂ : A →ₐ[R] B}
(H : ∀ x, Ideal.Quotient.mk I (g₁ x) = Ideal.Quotient.mk I (g₂ x)) : g₁ = g₂ :=
FormallyUnramified.lift_unique I hI g₁ g₂ (AlgHom.ext H)
theorem lift_unique_of_ringHom [FormallyUnramified R A] {C : Type*} [Ring C]
(f : B →+* C) (hf : IsNilpotent <| RingHom.ker f) (g₁ g₂ : A →ₐ[R] B)
(h : f.comp ↑g₁ = f.comp (g₂ : A →+* B)) : g₁ = g₂ :=
FormallyUnramified.lift_unique _ hf _ _
(by
ext x
have := RingHom.congr_fun h x
simpa only [Ideal.Quotient.eq, Function.comp_apply, AlgHom.coe_comp, Ideal.Quotient.mkₐ_eq_mk,
RingHom.mem_ker, map_sub, sub_eq_zero])
theorem ext' [FormallyUnramified R A] {C : Type*} [Ring C] (f : B →+* C)
(hf : IsNilpotent <| RingHom.ker f) (g₁ g₂ : A →ₐ[R] B) (h : ∀ x, f (g₁ x) = f (g₂ x)) :
g₁ = g₂ :=
FormallyUnramified.lift_unique_of_ringHom f hf g₁ g₂ (RingHom.ext h)
theorem lift_unique' [FormallyUnramified R A] {C : Type*} [Ring C]
[Algebra R C] (f : B →ₐ[R] C) (hf : IsNilpotent <| RingHom.ker (f : B →+* C))
(g₁ g₂ : A →ₐ[R] B) (h : f.comp g₁ = f.comp g₂) : g₁ = g₂ :=
FormallyUnramified.ext' _ hf g₁ g₂ (AlgHom.congr_fun h)
| theorem ext_of_iInf [FormallyUnramified R A] (hI : ⨅ i, I ^ i = ⊥) {g₁ g₂ : A →ₐ[R] B}
(H : ∀ x, Ideal.Quotient.mk I (g₁ x) = Ideal.Quotient.mk I (g₂ x)) : g₁ = g₂ := by
have (i : ℕ) :
(Ideal.Quotient.mkₐ R (I ^ i)).comp g₁ = (Ideal.Quotient.mkₐ R (I ^ i)).comp g₂ := by
by_cases hi : i = 0
· ext x
have : Subsingleton (B ⧸ I ^ i) := by
rw [hi, pow_zero, Ideal.one_eq_top]
infer_instance
exact Subsingleton.elim _ _
apply ext (I.map (algebraMap _ _)) ⟨i, by simp [← Ideal.map_pow]⟩
intro x
dsimp
rw [Ideal.Quotient.eq, ← map_sub, ← Ideal.mem_comap, Ideal.comap_map_of_surjective',
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Unramified/Basic.lean | 138 | 151 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.MFDeriv.SpecificFunctions
/-!
# Differentiability of models with corners and (extended) charts
In this file, we analyse the differentiability of charts, models with corners and extended charts.
We show that
* models with corners are differentiable
* charts are differentiable on their source
* `mdifferentiableOn_extChartAt`: `extChartAt` is differentiable on its source
Suppose a partial homeomorphism `e` is differentiable. This file shows
* `PartialHomeomorph.MDifferentiable.mfderiv`: its derivative is a continuous linear equivalence
* `PartialHomeomorph.MDifferentiable.mfderiv_bijective`: its derivative is bijective;
there are also spelling with trivial kernel and full range
In particular, (extended) charts have bijective differential.
## Tags
charts, differentiable, bijective
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Manifold ContDiff
open Bundle Set Topology
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
{I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H} {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
{E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H']
{I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'} {M' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M'] [ChartedSpace H' M']
{E'' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E''] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E''] {H'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H'']
{I'' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E'' H''} {M'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M''] [ChartedSpace H'' M'']
section ModelWithCorners
namespace ModelWithCorners
/- In general, the model with corner `I` is implicit in most theorems in differential geometry, but
this section is about `I` as a map, not as a parameter. Therefore, we make it explicit. -/
variable (I)
/-! #### Model with corners -/
protected theorem hasMFDerivAt {x} : HasMFDerivAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E) I x (ContinuousLinearMap.id _ _) :=
⟨I.continuousAt, (hasFDerivWithinAt_id _ _).congr' I.rightInvOn (mem_range_self _)⟩
protected theorem hasMFDerivWithinAt {s x} :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E) I s x (ContinuousLinearMap.id _ _) :=
I.hasMFDerivAt.hasMFDerivWithinAt
protected theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt {s x} : MDifferentiableWithinAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E) I s x :=
I.hasMFDerivWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt
protected theorem mdifferentiableAt {x} : MDifferentiableAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E) I x :=
I.hasMFDerivAt.mdifferentiableAt
protected theorem mdifferentiableOn {s} : MDifferentiableOn I 𝓘(𝕜, E) I s := fun _ _ =>
I.mdifferentiableWithinAt
protected theorem mdifferentiable : MDifferentiable I 𝓘(𝕜, E) I := fun _ => I.mdifferentiableAt
theorem hasMFDerivWithinAt_symm {x} (hx : x ∈ range I) :
HasMFDerivWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) I I.symm (range I) x (ContinuousLinearMap.id _ _) :=
⟨I.continuousWithinAt_symm,
(hasFDerivWithinAt_id _ _).congr' (fun _y hy => I.rightInvOn hy.1) ⟨hx, mem_range_self _⟩⟩
theorem mdifferentiableOn_symm : MDifferentiableOn 𝓘(𝕜, E) I I.symm (range I) := fun _x hx =>
(I.hasMFDerivWithinAt_symm hx).mdifferentiableWithinAt
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_symm {z : E} (hz : z ∈ range I) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) I I.symm (range I) z :=
I.mdifferentiableOn_symm z hz
end ModelWithCorners
end ModelWithCorners
section Charts
variable [IsManifold I 1 M] [IsManifold I' 1 M']
[IsManifold I'' 1 M''] {e : PartialHomeomorph M H}
theorem mdifferentiableAt_atlas (h : e ∈ atlas H M) {x : M} (hx : x ∈ e.source) :
MDifferentiableAt I I e x := by
rw [mdifferentiableAt_iff]
refine ⟨(e.continuousOn x hx).continuousAt (e.open_source.mem_nhds hx), ?_⟩
have mem :
I ((chartAt H x : M → H) x) ∈ I.symm ⁻¹' ((chartAt H x).symm ≫ₕ e).source ∩ range I := by
simp only [hx, mfld_simps]
have : (chartAt H x).symm.trans e ∈ contDiffGroupoid 1 I :=
HasGroupoid.compatible (chart_mem_atlas H x) h
have A :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 1 (I ∘ (chartAt H x).symm.trans e ∘ I.symm)
(I.symm ⁻¹' ((chartAt H x).symm.trans e).source ∩ range I) :=
this.1
have B := A.differentiableOn le_rfl (I ((chartAt H x : M → H) x)) mem
simp only [mfld_simps] at B
rw [inter_comm, differentiableWithinAt_inter] at B
· simpa only [mfld_simps]
· apply IsOpen.mem_nhds ((PartialHomeomorph.open_source _).preimage I.continuous_symm) mem.1
theorem mdifferentiableOn_atlas (h : e ∈ atlas H M) : MDifferentiableOn I I e e.source :=
fun _x hx => (mdifferentiableAt_atlas h hx).mdifferentiableWithinAt
theorem mdifferentiableAt_atlas_symm (h : e ∈ atlas H M) {x : H} (hx : x ∈ e.target) :
MDifferentiableAt I I e.symm x := by
| rw [mdifferentiableAt_iff]
refine ⟨(e.continuousOn_symm x hx).continuousAt (e.open_target.mem_nhds hx), ?_⟩
have mem : I x ∈ I.symm ⁻¹' (e.symm ≫ₕ chartAt H (e.symm x)).source ∩ range I := by
simp only [hx, mfld_simps]
have : e.symm.trans (chartAt H (e.symm x)) ∈ contDiffGroupoid 1 I :=
HasGroupoid.compatible h (chart_mem_atlas H _)
have A :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 1 (I ∘ e.symm.trans (chartAt H (e.symm x)) ∘ I.symm)
(I.symm ⁻¹' (e.symm.trans (chartAt H (e.symm x))).source ∩ range I) :=
this.1
have B := A.differentiableOn le_rfl (I x) mem
simp only [mfld_simps] at B
rw [inter_comm, differentiableWithinAt_inter] at B
· simpa only [mfld_simps]
· apply IsOpen.mem_nhds ((PartialHomeomorph.open_source _).preimage I.continuous_symm) mem.1
theorem mdifferentiableOn_atlas_symm (h : e ∈ atlas H M) : MDifferentiableOn I I e.symm e.target :=
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/MFDeriv/Atlas.lean | 113 | 129 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.Cover.Open
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.GammaSpecAdjunction
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.Restrict
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Opposites
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.InvSubmonoid
import Mathlib.RingTheory.RingHom.Surjective
import Mathlib.Topology.Sheaves.CommRingCat
/-!
# Affine schemes
We define the category of `AffineScheme`s as the essential image of `Spec`.
We also define predicates about affine schemes and affine open sets.
## Main definitions
* `AlgebraicGeometry.AffineScheme`: The category of affine schemes.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.IsAffine`: A scheme is affine if the canonical map `X ⟶ Spec Γ(X)` is an
isomorphism.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.isoSpec`: The canonical isomorphism `X ≅ Spec Γ(X)` for an affine
scheme.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.AffineScheme.equivCommRingCat`: The equivalence of categories
`AffineScheme ≌ CommRingᵒᵖ` given by `AffineScheme.Spec : CommRingᵒᵖ ⥤ AffineScheme` and
`AffineScheme.Γ : AffineSchemeᵒᵖ ⥤ CommRingCat`.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.IsAffineOpen`: An open subset of a scheme is affine if the open subscheme is
affine.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.IsAffineOpen.fromSpec`: The immersion `Spec 𝒪ₓ(U) ⟶ X` for an affine `U`.
-/
-- Explicit universe annotations were used in this file to improve performance https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12737
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits Opposite TopologicalSpace
universe u
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
open Spec (structureSheaf)
/-- The category of affine schemes -/
def AffineScheme :=
Scheme.Spec.EssImageSubcategory
deriving Category
/-- A Scheme is affine if the canonical map `X ⟶ Spec Γ(X)` is an isomorphism. -/
class IsAffine (X : Scheme) : Prop where
affine : IsIso X.toSpecΓ
attribute [instance] IsAffine.affine
instance (X : Scheme.{u}) [IsAffine X] : IsIso (ΓSpec.adjunction.unit.app X) := @IsAffine.affine X _
/-- The canonical isomorphism `X ≅ Spec Γ(X)` for an affine scheme. -/
@[simps! -isSimp hom]
def Scheme.isoSpec (X : Scheme) [IsAffine X] : X ≅ Spec Γ(X, ⊤) :=
asIso X.toSpecΓ
@[reassoc]
theorem Scheme.isoSpec_hom_naturality {X Y : Scheme} [IsAffine X] [IsAffine Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
X.isoSpec.hom ≫ Spec.map (f.appTop) = f ≫ Y.isoSpec.hom := by
simp only [isoSpec, asIso_hom, Scheme.toSpecΓ_naturality]
@[reassoc]
theorem Scheme.isoSpec_inv_naturality {X Y : Scheme} [IsAffine X] [IsAffine Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
Spec.map (f.appTop) ≫ Y.isoSpec.inv = X.isoSpec.inv ≫ f := by
rw [Iso.eq_inv_comp, isoSpec, asIso_hom, ← Scheme.toSpecΓ_naturality_assoc, isoSpec,
asIso_inv, IsIso.hom_inv_id, Category.comp_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma Scheme.toSpecΓ_isoSpec_inv (X : Scheme.{u}) [IsAffine X] :
X.toSpecΓ ≫ X.isoSpec.inv = 𝟙 _ :=
X.isoSpec.hom_inv_id
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma Scheme.isoSpec_inv_toSpecΓ (X : Scheme.{u}) [IsAffine X] :
X.isoSpec.inv ≫ X.toSpecΓ = 𝟙 _ :=
X.isoSpec.inv_hom_id
/-- Construct an affine scheme from a scheme and the information that it is affine.
Also see `AffineScheme.of` for a typeclass version. -/
@[simps]
def AffineScheme.mk (X : Scheme) (_ : IsAffine X) : AffineScheme :=
⟨X, ΓSpec.adjunction.mem_essImage_of_unit_isIso _⟩
/-- Construct an affine scheme from a scheme. Also see `AffineScheme.mk` for a non-typeclass
version. -/
def AffineScheme.of (X : Scheme) [h : IsAffine X] : AffineScheme :=
AffineScheme.mk X h
/-- Type check a morphism of schemes as a morphism in `AffineScheme`. -/
def AffineScheme.ofHom {X Y : Scheme} [IsAffine X] [IsAffine Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
AffineScheme.of X ⟶ AffineScheme.of Y :=
f
@[simp]
theorem essImage_Spec {X : Scheme} : Scheme.Spec.essImage X ↔ IsAffine X :=
⟨fun h => ⟨Functor.essImage.unit_isIso h⟩,
fun _ => ΓSpec.adjunction.mem_essImage_of_unit_isIso _⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-08")] alias mem_Spec_essImage := essImage_Spec
instance isAffine_affineScheme (X : AffineScheme.{u}) : IsAffine X.obj :=
⟨Functor.essImage.unit_isIso X.property⟩
instance (R : CommRingCatᵒᵖ) : IsAffine (Scheme.Spec.obj R) :=
AlgebraicGeometry.isAffine_affineScheme ⟨_, Scheme.Spec.obj_mem_essImage R⟩
instance isAffine_Spec (R : CommRingCat) : IsAffine (Spec R) :=
AlgebraicGeometry.isAffine_affineScheme ⟨_, Scheme.Spec.obj_mem_essImage (op R)⟩
theorem IsAffine.of_isIso {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] [h : IsAffine Y] : IsAffine X := by
rw [← essImage_Spec] at h ⊢; exact Functor.essImage.ofIso (asIso f).symm h
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-31")] alias isAffine_of_isIso := IsAffine.of_isIso
/-- If `f : X ⟶ Y` is a morphism between affine schemes, the corresponding arrow is isomorphic
to the arrow of the morphism on prime spectra induced by the map on global sections. -/
noncomputable
def arrowIsoSpecΓOfIsAffine {X Y : Scheme} [IsAffine X] [IsAffine Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
Arrow.mk f ≅ Arrow.mk (Spec.map f.appTop) :=
Arrow.isoMk X.isoSpec Y.isoSpec (ΓSpec.adjunction.unit_naturality _)
/-- If `f : A ⟶ B` is a ring homomorphism, the corresponding arrow is isomorphic
to the arrow of the morphism induced on global sections by the map on prime spectra. -/
def arrowIsoΓSpecOfIsAffine {A B : CommRingCat} (f : A ⟶ B) :
Arrow.mk f ≅ Arrow.mk ((Spec.map f).appTop) :=
Arrow.isoMk (Scheme.ΓSpecIso _).symm (Scheme.ΓSpecIso _).symm
(Scheme.ΓSpecIso_inv_naturality f).symm
theorem Scheme.isoSpec_Spec (R : CommRingCat.{u}) :
(Spec R).isoSpec = Scheme.Spec.mapIso (Scheme.ΓSpecIso R).op :=
Iso.ext (SpecMap_ΓSpecIso_hom R).symm
@[simp] theorem Scheme.isoSpec_Spec_hom (R : CommRingCat.{u}) :
(Spec R).isoSpec.hom = Spec.map (Scheme.ΓSpecIso R).hom :=
(SpecMap_ΓSpecIso_hom R).symm
@[simp] theorem Scheme.isoSpec_Spec_inv (R : CommRingCat.{u}) :
(Spec R).isoSpec.inv = Spec.map (Scheme.ΓSpecIso R).inv :=
congr($(isoSpec_Spec R).inv)
lemma ext_of_isAffine {X Y : Scheme} [IsAffine Y] {f g : X ⟶ Y} (e : f.appTop = g.appTop) :
f = g := by
rw [← cancel_mono Y.toSpecΓ, Scheme.toSpecΓ_naturality, Scheme.toSpecΓ_naturality, e]
namespace AffineScheme
/-- The `Spec` functor into the category of affine schemes. -/
def Spec : CommRingCatᵒᵖ ⥤ AffineScheme :=
Scheme.Spec.toEssImage
/-! We copy over instances from `Scheme.Spec.toEssImage`. -/
instance Spec_full : Spec.Full := Functor.Full.toEssImage _
instance Spec_faithful : Spec.Faithful := Functor.Faithful.toEssImage _
instance Spec_essSurj : Spec.EssSurj := Functor.EssSurj.toEssImage (F := _)
/-- The forgetful functor `AffineScheme ⥤ Scheme`. -/
@[simps!]
def forgetToScheme : AffineScheme ⥤ Scheme :=
Scheme.Spec.essImage.ι
/-! We copy over instances from `Scheme.Spec.essImageInclusion`. -/
instance forgetToScheme_full : forgetToScheme.Full :=
inferInstanceAs Scheme.Spec.essImage.ι.Full
instance forgetToScheme_faithful : forgetToScheme.Faithful :=
inferInstanceAs Scheme.Spec.essImage.ι.Faithful
/-- The global section functor of an affine scheme. -/
def Γ : AffineSchemeᵒᵖ ⥤ CommRingCat :=
forgetToScheme.op ⋙ Scheme.Γ
/-- The category of affine schemes is equivalent to the category of commutative rings. -/
def equivCommRingCat : AffineScheme ≌ CommRingCatᵒᵖ :=
equivEssImageOfReflective.symm
instance : Γ.{u}.rightOp.IsEquivalence := equivCommRingCat.isEquivalence_functor
instance : Γ.{u}.rightOp.op.IsEquivalence := equivCommRingCat.op.isEquivalence_functor
instance ΓIsEquiv : Γ.{u}.IsEquivalence :=
inferInstanceAs (Γ.{u}.rightOp.op ⋙ (opOpEquivalence _).functor).IsEquivalence
instance hasColimits : HasColimits AffineScheme.{u} :=
haveI := Adjunction.has_limits_of_equivalence.{u} Γ.{u}
Adjunction.has_colimits_of_equivalence.{u} (opOpEquivalence AffineScheme.{u}).inverse
instance hasLimits : HasLimits AffineScheme.{u} := by
haveI := Adjunction.has_colimits_of_equivalence Γ.{u}
haveI : HasLimits AffineScheme.{u}ᵒᵖᵒᵖ := Limits.hasLimits_op_of_hasColimits
exact Adjunction.has_limits_of_equivalence (opOpEquivalence AffineScheme.{u}).inverse
noncomputable instance Γ_preservesLimits : PreservesLimits Γ.{u}.rightOp := inferInstance
noncomputable instance forgetToScheme_preservesLimits : PreservesLimits forgetToScheme := by
apply (config := { allowSynthFailures := true })
@preservesLimits_of_natIso _ _ _ _ _ _
(isoWhiskerRight equivCommRingCat.unitIso forgetToScheme).symm
change PreservesLimits (equivCommRingCat.functor ⋙ Scheme.Spec)
infer_instance
end AffineScheme
/-- An open subset of a scheme is affine if the open subscheme is affine. -/
def IsAffineOpen {X : Scheme} (U : X.Opens) : Prop :=
IsAffine U
/-- The set of affine opens as a subset of `opens X`. -/
def Scheme.affineOpens (X : Scheme) : Set X.Opens :=
{U : X.Opens | IsAffineOpen U}
instance {Y : Scheme.{u}} (U : Y.affineOpens) : IsAffine U :=
U.property
theorem isAffineOpen_opensRange {X Y : Scheme} [IsAffine X] (f : X ⟶ Y)
[H : IsOpenImmersion f] : IsAffineOpen (Scheme.Hom.opensRange f) := by
refine .of_isIso (IsOpenImmersion.isoOfRangeEq f (Y.ofRestrict _) ?_).inv
exact Subtype.range_val.symm
theorem isAffineOpen_top (X : Scheme) [IsAffine X] : IsAffineOpen (⊤ : X.Opens) := by
convert isAffineOpen_opensRange (𝟙 X)
ext1
exact Set.range_id.symm
instance Scheme.isAffine_affineCover (X : Scheme) (i : X.affineCover.J) :
IsAffine (X.affineCover.obj i) :=
isAffine_Spec _
instance Scheme.isAffine_affineBasisCover (X : Scheme) (i : X.affineBasisCover.J) :
IsAffine (X.affineBasisCover.obj i) :=
isAffine_Spec _
instance Scheme.isAffine_affineOpenCover (X : Scheme) (𝒰 : X.AffineOpenCover) (i : 𝒰.J) :
IsAffine (𝒰.openCover.obj i) :=
inferInstanceAs (IsAffine (Spec (𝒰.obj i)))
instance {X} [IsAffine X] (i) :
IsAffine ((Scheme.coverOfIsIso (P := @IsOpenImmersion) (𝟙 X)).obj i) := by
dsimp; infer_instance
theorem isBasis_affine_open (X : Scheme) : Opens.IsBasis X.affineOpens := by
rw [Opens.isBasis_iff_nbhd]
rintro U x (hU : x ∈ (U : Set X))
obtain ⟨S, hS, hxS, hSU⟩ := X.affineBasisCover_is_basis.exists_subset_of_mem_open hU U.isOpen
refine ⟨⟨S, X.affineBasisCover_is_basis.isOpen hS⟩, ?_, hxS, hSU⟩
rcases hS with ⟨i, rfl⟩
exact isAffineOpen_opensRange _
theorem iSup_affineOpens_eq_top (X : Scheme) : ⨆ i : X.affineOpens, (i : X.Opens) = ⊤ := by
apply Opens.ext
rw [Opens.coe_iSup]
apply IsTopologicalBasis.sUnion_eq
rw [← Set.image_eq_range]
exact isBasis_affine_open X
theorem Scheme.map_PrimeSpectrum_basicOpen_of_affine
(X : Scheme) [IsAffine X] (f : Γ(X, ⊤)) :
X.isoSpec.hom ⁻¹ᵁ PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen f = X.basicOpen f :=
Scheme.toSpecΓ_preimage_basicOpen _ _
theorem isBasis_basicOpen (X : Scheme) [IsAffine X] :
Opens.IsBasis (Set.range (X.basicOpen : Γ(X, ⊤) → X.Opens)) := by
delta Opens.IsBasis
convert PrimeSpectrum.isBasis_basic_opens.isInducing
(TopCat.homeoOfIso (Scheme.forgetToTop.mapIso X.isoSpec)).isInducing using 1
ext
simp only [Set.mem_image, exists_exists_eq_and]
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, ⟨x, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
refine ⟨_, ⟨_, ⟨x, rfl⟩, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
exact congr_arg Opens.carrier (Scheme.toSpecΓ_preimage_basicOpen _ _)
· rintro ⟨_, ⟨_, ⟨x, rfl⟩, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
refine ⟨_, ⟨x, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
exact congr_arg Opens.carrier (Scheme.toSpecΓ_preimage_basicOpen _ _).symm
/-- The canonical map `U ⟶ Spec Γ(X, U)` for an open `U ⊆ X`. -/
noncomputable
def Scheme.Opens.toSpecΓ {X : Scheme.{u}} (U : X.Opens) :
U.toScheme ⟶ Spec Γ(X, U) :=
U.toScheme.toSpecΓ ≫ Spec.map U.topIso.inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma Scheme.Opens.toSpecΓ_SpecMap_map {X : Scheme} (U V : X.Opens) (h : U ≤ V) :
U.toSpecΓ ≫ Spec.map (X.presheaf.map (homOfLE h).op) = X.homOfLE h ≫ V.toSpecΓ := by
delta Scheme.Opens.toSpecΓ
simp [← Spec.map_comp, ← X.presheaf.map_comp, toSpecΓ_naturality_assoc]
@[simp]
lemma Scheme.Opens.toSpecΓ_top {X : Scheme} :
(⊤ : X.Opens).toSpecΓ = (⊤ : X.Opens).ι ≫ X.toSpecΓ := by
simp [Scheme.Opens.toSpecΓ, toSpecΓ_naturality]; rfl
@[reassoc]
lemma Scheme.Opens.toSpecΓ_appTop {X : Scheme.{u}} (U : X.Opens) :
U.toSpecΓ.appTop = (Scheme.ΓSpecIso Γ(X, U)).hom ≫ U.topIso.inv := by
simp [Scheme.Opens.toSpecΓ]
namespace IsAffineOpen
variable {X Y : Scheme.{u}} {U : X.Opens} (hU : IsAffineOpen U) (f : Γ(X, U))
attribute [-simp] eqToHom_op in
/-- The isomorphism `U ≅ Spec Γ(X, U)` for an affine `U`. -/
@[simps! -isSimp inv]
def isoSpec :
↑U ≅ Spec Γ(X, U) :=
haveI : IsAffine U := hU
U.toScheme.isoSpec ≪≫ Scheme.Spec.mapIso U.topIso.symm.op
lemma isoSpec_hom : hU.isoSpec.hom = U.toSpecΓ := rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma toSpecΓ_isoSpec_inv : U.toSpecΓ ≫ hU.isoSpec.inv = 𝟙 _ := hU.isoSpec.hom_inv_id
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma isoSpec_inv_toSpecΓ : hU.isoSpec.inv ≫ U.toSpecΓ = 𝟙 _ := hU.isoSpec.inv_hom_id
open IsLocalRing in
lemma isoSpec_hom_base_apply (x : U) :
hU.isoSpec.hom.base x = (Spec.map (X.presheaf.germ U x x.2)).base (closedPoint _) := by
dsimp [IsAffineOpen.isoSpec_hom, Scheme.isoSpec_hom, Scheme.toSpecΓ_base, Scheme.Opens.toSpecΓ]
rw [← Scheme.comp_base_apply, ← Spec.map_comp,
(Iso.eq_comp_inv _).mpr (Scheme.Opens.germ_stalkIso_hom U (V := ⊤) x trivial),
X.presheaf.germ_res_assoc, Spec.map_comp, Scheme.comp_base_apply]
congr 1
exact IsLocalRing.comap_closedPoint (U.stalkIso x).inv.hom
lemma isoSpec_inv_appTop :
hU.isoSpec.inv.appTop = U.topIso.hom ≫ (Scheme.ΓSpecIso Γ(X, U)).inv := by
simp_rw [Scheme.Opens.toScheme_presheaf_obj, isoSpec_inv, Scheme.isoSpec, asIso_inv,
Scheme.comp_app, Scheme.Opens.topIso_hom, Scheme.ΓSpecIso_inv_naturality,
Scheme.inv_appTop, -- `check_compositions` reports defeq problems starting after this step.
IsIso.inv_comp_eq]
rw [Scheme.toSpecΓ_appTop]
-- We need `erw` here because the goal has
-- `Scheme.ΓSpecIso Γ(↑U, ⊤)).hom ≫ Scheme.ΓSpecIso Γ(X, U.ι ''ᵁ ⊤)).inv`
-- and `Γ(X, U.ι ''ᵁ ⊤)` is non-reducibly defeq to `Γ(↑U, ⊤)`.
erw [Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc]
simp only [Opens.map_top]
lemma isoSpec_hom_appTop :
hU.isoSpec.hom.appTop = (Scheme.ΓSpecIso Γ(X, U)).hom ≫ U.topIso.inv := by
have := congr(inv $hU.isoSpec_inv_appTop)
rw [IsIso.inv_comp, IsIso.Iso.inv_inv, IsIso.Iso.inv_hom] at this
have := (Scheme.Γ.map_inv hU.isoSpec.inv.op).trans this
rwa [← op_inv, IsIso.Iso.inv_inv] at this
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-16")] alias isoSpec_inv_app_top := isoSpec_inv_appTop
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-16")] alias isoSpec_hom_app_top := isoSpec_hom_appTop
/-- The open immersion `Spec Γ(X, U) ⟶ X` for an affine `U`. -/
def fromSpec :
Spec Γ(X, U) ⟶ X :=
haveI : IsAffine U := hU
hU.isoSpec.inv ≫ U.ι
instance isOpenImmersion_fromSpec :
IsOpenImmersion hU.fromSpec := by
delta fromSpec
infer_instance
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma isoSpec_inv_ι : hU.isoSpec.inv ≫ U.ι = hU.fromSpec := rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma toSpecΓ_fromSpec : U.toSpecΓ ≫ hU.fromSpec = U.ι := toSpecΓ_isoSpec_inv_assoc _ _
@[simp]
theorem range_fromSpec :
Set.range hU.fromSpec.base = (U : Set X) := by
delta IsAffineOpen.fromSpec; dsimp [IsAffineOpen.isoSpec_inv]
rw [Set.range_comp, Set.range_eq_univ.mpr, Set.image_univ]
· exact Subtype.range_coe
rw [← TopCat.coe_comp, ← TopCat.epi_iff_surjective]
infer_instance
@[simp]
theorem opensRange_fromSpec : hU.fromSpec.opensRange = U := Opens.ext (range_fromSpec hU)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem map_fromSpec {V : X.Opens} (hV : IsAffineOpen V) (f : op U ⟶ op V) :
Spec.map (X.presheaf.map f) ≫ hU.fromSpec = hV.fromSpec := by
have : IsAffine U := hU
haveI : IsAffine _ := hV
conv_rhs =>
rw [fromSpec, ← X.homOfLE_ι (V := U) f.unop.le, isoSpec_inv, Category.assoc,
← Scheme.isoSpec_inv_naturality_assoc,
← Spec.map_comp_assoc, Scheme.homOfLE_appTop, ← Functor.map_comp]
rw [fromSpec, isoSpec_inv, Category.assoc, ← Spec.map_comp_assoc, ← Functor.map_comp]
rfl
@[reassoc]
lemma Spec_map_appLE_fromSpec (f : X ⟶ Y) {V : X.Opens} {U : Y.Opens}
(hU : IsAffineOpen U) (hV : IsAffineOpen V) (i : V ≤ f ⁻¹ᵁ U) :
Spec.map (f.appLE U V i) ≫ hU.fromSpec = hV.fromSpec ≫ f := by
have : IsAffine U := hU
simp only [IsAffineOpen.fromSpec, Category.assoc, isoSpec_inv]
simp_rw [← Scheme.homOfLE_ι _ i]
rw [Category.assoc, ← morphismRestrict_ι,
← Category.assoc _ (f ∣_ U) U.ι, ← @Scheme.isoSpec_inv_naturality_assoc,
← Spec.map_comp_assoc, ← Spec.map_comp_assoc, Scheme.comp_appTop, morphismRestrict_appTop,
Scheme.homOfLE_appTop, Scheme.Hom.app_eq_appLE, Scheme.Hom.appLE_map,
Scheme.Hom.appLE_map, Scheme.Hom.appLE_map, Scheme.Hom.map_appLE]
lemma fromSpec_top [IsAffine X] : (isAffineOpen_top X).fromSpec = X.isoSpec.inv := by
rw [fromSpec, isoSpec_inv, Category.assoc, ← @Scheme.isoSpec_inv_naturality,
← Spec.map_comp_assoc, Scheme.Opens.ι_appTop, ← X.presheaf.map_comp, ← op_comp,
eqToHom_comp_homOfLE, ← eqToHom_eq_homOfLE rfl, eqToHom_refl, op_id, X.presheaf.map_id,
Spec.map_id, Category.id_comp]
lemma fromSpec_app_of_le (V : X.Opens) (h : U ≤ V) :
hU.fromSpec.app V = X.presheaf.map (homOfLE h).op ≫
(Scheme.ΓSpecIso Γ(X, U)).inv ≫ (Spec _).presheaf.map (homOfLE le_top).op := by
have : U.ι ⁻¹ᵁ V = ⊤ := eq_top_iff.mpr fun x _ ↦ h x.2
rw [IsAffineOpen.fromSpec, Scheme.comp_app, Scheme.Opens.ι_app, Scheme.app_eq _ this,
← Scheme.Hom.appTop, IsAffineOpen.isoSpec_inv_appTop]
simp only [Scheme.Opens.toScheme_presheaf_map, Scheme.Opens.topIso_hom,
Category.assoc, ← X.presheaf.map_comp_assoc]
rfl
include hU in
protected theorem isCompact :
IsCompact (U : Set X) := by
convert @IsCompact.image _ _ _ _ Set.univ hU.fromSpec.base PrimeSpectrum.compactSpace.1
(by fun_prop)
convert hU.range_fromSpec.symm
exact Set.image_univ
include hU in
theorem image_of_isOpenImmersion (f : X ⟶ Y) [H : IsOpenImmersion f] :
IsAffineOpen (f ''ᵁ U) := by
have : IsAffine _ := hU
convert isAffineOpen_opensRange (U.ι ≫ f)
ext1
exact Set.image_eq_range _ _
theorem preimage_of_isIso {U : Y.Opens} (hU : IsAffineOpen U) (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] :
IsAffineOpen (f ⁻¹ᵁ U) :=
haveI : IsAffine _ := hU
.of_isIso (f ∣_ U)
theorem _root_.AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.Hom.isAffineOpen_iff_of_isOpenImmersion
(f : AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.Hom X Y) [H : IsOpenImmersion f] {U : X.Opens} :
IsAffineOpen (f ''ᵁ U) ↔ IsAffineOpen U where
mp hU := by
refine .of_isIso (IsOpenImmersion.isoOfRangeEq (X.ofRestrict U.isOpenEmbedding ≫ f)
(Y.ofRestrict _) ?_).hom (h := hU)
rw [Scheme.comp_base, TopCat.coe_comp, Set.range_comp]
dsimp [Opens.coe_inclusion', Scheme.restrict]
rw [Subtype.range_coe, Subtype.range_coe]
rfl
mpr hU := hU.image_of_isOpenImmersion f
/-- The affine open sets of an open subscheme corresponds to
the affine open sets containing in the image. -/
@[simps]
def _root_.AlgebraicGeometry.IsOpenImmersion.affineOpensEquiv (f : X ⟶ Y) [H : IsOpenImmersion f] :
X.affineOpens ≃ { U : Y.affineOpens // U ≤ f.opensRange } where
toFun U := ⟨⟨f ''ᵁ U, U.2.image_of_isOpenImmersion f⟩, Set.image_subset_range _ _⟩
invFun U := ⟨f ⁻¹ᵁ U, f.isAffineOpen_iff_of_isOpenImmersion.mp (by
rw [show f ''ᵁ f ⁻¹ᵁ U = U from Opens.ext (Set.image_preimage_eq_of_subset U.2)]; exact U.1.2)⟩
left_inv _ := Subtype.ext (Opens.ext (Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.injective))
right_inv U := Subtype.ext (Subtype.ext (Opens.ext (Set.image_preimage_eq_of_subset U.2)))
/-- The affine open sets of an open subscheme
corresponds to the affine open sets containing in the subset. -/
@[simps! apply_coe_coe]
def _root_.AlgebraicGeometry.affineOpensRestrict {X : Scheme.{u}} (U : X.Opens) :
U.toScheme.affineOpens ≃ { V : X.affineOpens // V ≤ U } :=
(IsOpenImmersion.affineOpensEquiv U.ι).trans (Equiv.subtypeEquivProp (by simp))
@[simp]
lemma _root_.AlgebraicGeometry.affineOpensRestrict_symm_apply_coe
{X : Scheme.{u}} (U : X.Opens) (V) :
((affineOpensRestrict U).symm V).1 = U.ι ⁻¹ᵁ V := rfl
instance (priority := 100) _root_.AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.compactSpace_of_isAffine
(X : Scheme) [IsAffine X] :
CompactSpace X :=
⟨(isAffineOpen_top X).isCompact⟩
@[simp]
theorem fromSpec_preimage_self :
hU.fromSpec ⁻¹ᵁ U = ⊤ := by
ext1
rw [Opens.map_coe, Opens.coe_top, ← hU.range_fromSpec, ← Set.image_univ]
exact Set.preimage_image_eq _ PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.base_open.injective
theorem ΓSpecIso_hom_fromSpec_app :
(Scheme.ΓSpecIso Γ(X, U)).hom ≫ hU.fromSpec.app U =
(Spec Γ(X, U)).presheaf.map (eqToHom hU.fromSpec_preimage_self).op := by
simp only [fromSpec, Scheme.comp_coeBase, Opens.map_comp_obj, Scheme.comp_app,
Scheme.Opens.ι_app_self, eqToHom_op, Scheme.app_eq _ U.ι_preimage_self,
Scheme.Opens.toScheme_presheaf_map, eqToHom_unop, eqToHom_map U.ι.opensFunctor, Opens.map_top,
isoSpec_inv_appTop, Scheme.Opens.topIso_hom, Category.assoc, ← Functor.map_comp_assoc,
eqToHom_trans, eqToHom_refl, X.presheaf.map_id, Category.id_comp, Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc]
@[elementwise]
theorem fromSpec_app_self :
hU.fromSpec.app U = (Scheme.ΓSpecIso Γ(X, U)).inv ≫
(Spec Γ(X, U)).presheaf.map (eqToHom hU.fromSpec_preimage_self).op := by
rw [← hU.ΓSpecIso_hom_fromSpec_app, Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc]
theorem fromSpec_preimage_basicOpen' :
hU.fromSpec ⁻¹ᵁ X.basicOpen f = (Spec Γ(X, U)).basicOpen ((Scheme.ΓSpecIso Γ(X, U)).inv f) := by
rw [Scheme.preimage_basicOpen, hU.fromSpec_app_self]
exact Scheme.basicOpen_res_eq _ _ (eqToHom hU.fromSpec_preimage_self).op
theorem fromSpec_preimage_basicOpen :
hU.fromSpec ⁻¹ᵁ X.basicOpen f = PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen f := by
rw [fromSpec_preimage_basicOpen', ← basicOpen_eq_of_affine]
theorem fromSpec_image_basicOpen :
hU.fromSpec ''ᵁ (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen f) = X.basicOpen f := by
rw [← hU.fromSpec_preimage_basicOpen]
ext1
change hU.fromSpec.base '' (hU.fromSpec.base ⁻¹' (X.basicOpen f : Set X)) = _
rw [Set.image_preimage_eq_inter_range, Set.inter_eq_left, hU.range_fromSpec]
exact Scheme.basicOpen_le _ _
@[simp]
theorem basicOpen_fromSpec_app :
(Spec Γ(X, U)).basicOpen (hU.fromSpec.app U f) = PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen f := by
rw [← hU.fromSpec_preimage_basicOpen, Scheme.preimage_basicOpen]
include hU in
theorem basicOpen :
IsAffineOpen (X.basicOpen f) := by
rw [← hU.fromSpec_image_basicOpen, Scheme.Hom.isAffineOpen_iff_of_isOpenImmersion]
convert isAffineOpen_opensRange
(Spec.map (CommRingCat.ofHom <| algebraMap Γ(X, U) (Localization.Away f)))
exact Opens.ext (PrimeSpectrum.localization_away_comap_range (Localization.Away f) f).symm
lemma Spec_basicOpen {R : CommRingCat} (f : R) :
IsAffineOpen (X := Spec R) (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen f) :=
basicOpen_eq_of_affine f ▸ (isAffineOpen_top (Spec (.of R))).basicOpen _
instance [IsAffine X] (r : Γ(X, ⊤)) : IsAffine (X.basicOpen r) :=
(isAffineOpen_top X).basicOpen _
include hU in
theorem ι_basicOpen_preimage (r : Γ(X, ⊤)) :
IsAffineOpen ((X.basicOpen r).ι ⁻¹ᵁ U) := by
apply (X.basicOpen r).ι.isAffineOpen_iff_of_isOpenImmersion.mp
dsimp [Scheme.Hom.opensFunctor, LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.opensFunctor]
rw [Opens.functor_obj_map_obj, Opens.isOpenEmbedding_obj_top, inf_comm,
← Scheme.basicOpen_res _ _ (homOfLE le_top).op]
exact hU.basicOpen _
include hU in
theorem exists_basicOpen_le {V : X.Opens} (x : V) (h : ↑x ∈ U) :
∃ f : Γ(X, U), X.basicOpen f ≤ V ∧ ↑x ∈ X.basicOpen f := by
have : IsAffine _ := hU
obtain ⟨_, ⟨_, ⟨r, rfl⟩, rfl⟩, h₁, h₂⟩ :=
(isBasis_basicOpen U).exists_subset_of_mem_open (x.2 : (⟨x, h⟩ : U) ∈ _)
((Opens.map U.inclusion').obj V).isOpen
have :
U.ι ''ᵁ (U.toScheme.basicOpen r) =
X.basicOpen (X.presheaf.map (eqToHom U.isOpenEmbedding_obj_top.symm).op r) := by
refine (Scheme.image_basicOpen U.ι r).trans ?_
rw [Scheme.basicOpen_res_eq]
simp only [Scheme.Opens.toScheme_presheaf_obj, Scheme.Opens.ι_appIso, Iso.refl_inv,
CommRingCat.id_apply]
use X.presheaf.map (eqToHom U.isOpenEmbedding_obj_top.symm).op r
rw [← this]
exact ⟨Set.image_subset_iff.mpr h₂, ⟨_, h⟩, h₁, rfl⟩
noncomputable
instance {R : CommRingCat} {U} : Algebra R Γ(Spec R, U) :=
((Scheme.ΓSpecIso R).inv ≫ (Spec R).presheaf.map (homOfLE le_top).op).hom.toAlgebra
@[simp]
lemma algebraMap_Spec_obj {R : CommRingCat} {U} : algebraMap R Γ(Spec R, U) =
((Scheme.ΓSpecIso R).inv ≫ (Spec R).presheaf.map (homOfLE le_top).op).hom := rfl
instance {R : CommRingCat} {f : R} :
IsLocalization.Away f Γ(Spec R, PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen f) :=
inferInstanceAs (IsLocalization.Away f
((Spec.structureSheaf R).val.obj (op <| PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen f)))
/-- Given an affine open U and some `f : U`,
this is the canonical map `Γ(𝒪ₓ, D(f)) ⟶ Γ(Spec 𝒪ₓ(U), D(f))`
This is an isomorphism, as witnessed by an `IsIso` instance. -/
def basicOpenSectionsToAffine :
Γ(X, X.basicOpen f) ⟶ Γ(Spec Γ(X, U), PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen f) :=
hU.fromSpec.c.app (op <| X.basicOpen f) ≫
(Spec Γ(X, U)).presheaf.map (eqToHom <| (hU.fromSpec_preimage_basicOpen f).symm).op
instance basicOpenSectionsToAffine_isIso :
IsIso (basicOpenSectionsToAffine hU f) := by
delta basicOpenSectionsToAffine
refine IsIso.comp_isIso' ?_ inferInstance
apply PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.isIso_of_subset
rw [hU.range_fromSpec]
exact RingedSpace.basicOpen_le _ _
include hU in
theorem isLocalization_basicOpen :
IsLocalization.Away f Γ(X, X.basicOpen f) := by
apply
(IsLocalization.isLocalization_iff_of_ringEquiv (Submonoid.powers f)
(asIso <| basicOpenSectionsToAffine hU f).commRingCatIsoToRingEquiv).mpr
convert StructureSheaf.IsLocalization.to_basicOpen _ f using 1
-- Porting note: more hand holding is required here, the next 3 lines were not necessary
congr 1
dsimp [CommRingCat.ofHom, RingHom.algebraMap_toAlgebra, ← CommRingCat.hom_comp,
basicOpenSectionsToAffine]
rw [hU.fromSpec.naturality_assoc, hU.fromSpec_app_self]
simp only [Category.assoc, ← Functor.map_comp, ← op_comp]
exact CommRingCat.hom_ext_iff.mp (StructureSheaf.toOpen_res _ _ _ _)
instance _root_.AlgebraicGeometry.isLocalization_away_of_isAffine
[IsAffine X] (r : Γ(X, ⊤)) :
IsLocalization.Away r Γ(X, X.basicOpen r) :=
isLocalization_basicOpen (isAffineOpen_top X) r
lemma appLE_eq_away_map {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) {U : Y.Opens} (hU : IsAffineOpen U)
{V : X.Opens} (hV : IsAffineOpen V) (e) (r : Γ(Y, U)) :
letI := hU.isLocalization_basicOpen r
letI := hV.isLocalization_basicOpen (f.appLE U V e r)
f.appLE (Y.basicOpen r) (X.basicOpen (f.appLE U V e r)) (by simp [Scheme.Hom.appLE]) =
CommRingCat.ofHom (IsLocalization.Away.map _ _ (f.appLE U V e).hom r) := by
letI := hU.isLocalization_basicOpen r
letI := hV.isLocalization_basicOpen (f.appLE U V e r)
ext : 1
apply IsLocalization.ringHom_ext (.powers r)
rw [IsLocalization.Away.map, CommRingCat.hom_ofHom, IsLocalization.map_comp,
RingHom.algebraMap_toAlgebra, RingHom.algebraMap_toAlgebra, ← CommRingCat.hom_comp,
| ← CommRingCat.hom_comp, Scheme.Hom.appLE_map, Scheme.Hom.map_appLE]
lemma app_basicOpen_eq_away_map {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) {U : Y.Opens}
(hU : IsAffineOpen U) (h : IsAffineOpen (f ⁻¹ᵁ U)) (r : Γ(Y, U)) :
haveI := hU.isLocalization_basicOpen r
haveI := h.isLocalization_basicOpen (f.app U r)
f.app (Y.basicOpen r) =
(CommRingCat.ofHom
(IsLocalization.Away.map Γ(Y, Y.basicOpen r) Γ(X, X.basicOpen (f.app U r)) (f.app U).hom r)
≫ X.presheaf.map (eqToHom (by simp)).op) := by
haveI := hU.isLocalization_basicOpen r
haveI := h.isLocalization_basicOpen (f.app U r)
ext : 1
apply IsLocalization.ringHom_ext (.powers r)
rw [IsLocalization.Away.map, CommRingCat.hom_comp, RingHom.comp_assoc, CommRingCat.hom_ofHom,
IsLocalization.map_comp, RingHom.algebraMap_toAlgebra,
RingHom.algebraMap_toAlgebra, ← RingHom.comp_assoc, ← CommRingCat.hom_comp,
← CommRingCat.hom_comp, ← X.presheaf.map_comp]
simp
/-- `f.app (Y.basicOpen r)` is isomorphic to map induced on localizations
`Γ(Y, Y.basicOpen r) ⟶ Γ(X, X.basicOpen (f.app U r))` -/
def appBasicOpenIsoAwayMap {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) {U : Y.Opens}
(hU : IsAffineOpen U) (h : IsAffineOpen (f ⁻¹ᵁ U)) (r : Γ(Y, U)) :
haveI := hU.isLocalization_basicOpen r
haveI := h.isLocalization_basicOpen (f.app U r)
Arrow.mk (f.app (Y.basicOpen r)) ≅
Arrow.mk (CommRingCat.ofHom (IsLocalization.Away.map Γ(Y, Y.basicOpen r)
Γ(X, X.basicOpen (f.app U r)) (f.app U).hom r)) :=
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/AffineScheme.lean | 641 | 669 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro, Simon Hudon
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.Fin2
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Tuples of types, and their categorical structure.
## Features
* `TypeVec n` - n-tuples of types
* `α ⟹ β` - n-tuples of maps
* `f ⊚ g` - composition
Also, support functions for operating with n-tuples of types, such as:
* `append1 α β` - append type `β` to n-tuple `α` to obtain an (n+1)-tuple
* `drop α` - drops the last element of an (n+1)-tuple
* `last α` - returns the last element of an (n+1)-tuple
* `appendFun f g` - appends a function g to an n-tuple of functions
* `dropFun f` - drops the last function from an n+1-tuple
* `lastFun f` - returns the last function of a tuple.
Since e.g. `append1 α.drop α.last` is propositionally equal to `α` but not definitionally equal
to it, we need support functions and lemmas to mediate between constructions.
-/
universe u v w
/-- n-tuples of types, as a category -/
@[pp_with_univ]
def TypeVec (n : ℕ) :=
Fin2 n → Type*
instance {n} : Inhabited (TypeVec.{u} n) :=
⟨fun _ => PUnit⟩
namespace TypeVec
variable {n : ℕ}
/-- arrow in the category of `TypeVec` -/
def Arrow (α β : TypeVec n) :=
∀ i : Fin2 n, α i → β i
@[inherit_doc] scoped[MvFunctor] infixl:40 " ⟹ " => TypeVec.Arrow
open MvFunctor
/-- Extensionality for arrows -/
@[ext]
theorem Arrow.ext {α β : TypeVec n} (f g : α ⟹ β) :
(∀ i, f i = g i) → f = g := by
intro h; funext i; apply h
instance Arrow.inhabited (α β : TypeVec n) [∀ i, Inhabited (β i)] : Inhabited (α ⟹ β) :=
⟨fun _ _ => default⟩
/-- identity of arrow composition -/
def id {α : TypeVec n} : α ⟹ α := fun _ x => x
/-- arrow composition in the category of `TypeVec` -/
def comp {α β γ : TypeVec n} (g : β ⟹ γ) (f : α ⟹ β) : α ⟹ γ := fun i x => g i (f i x)
@[inherit_doc] scoped[MvFunctor] infixr:80 " ⊚ " => TypeVec.comp -- type as \oo
@[simp]
theorem id_comp {α β : TypeVec n} (f : α ⟹ β) : id ⊚ f = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_id {α β : TypeVec n} (f : α ⟹ β) : f ⊚ id = f :=
rfl
theorem comp_assoc {α β γ δ : TypeVec n} (h : γ ⟹ δ) (g : β ⟹ γ) (f : α ⟹ β) :
(h ⊚ g) ⊚ f = h ⊚ g ⊚ f :=
rfl
/-- Support for extending a `TypeVec` by one element. -/
def append1 (α : TypeVec n) (β : Type*) : TypeVec (n + 1)
| Fin2.fs i => α i
| Fin2.fz => β
@[inherit_doc] infixl:67 " ::: " => append1
/-- retain only a `n-length` prefix of the argument -/
def drop (α : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1)) : TypeVec n := fun i => α i.fs
/-- take the last value of a `(n+1)-length` vector -/
def last (α : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1)) : Type _ :=
α Fin2.fz
instance last.inhabited (α : TypeVec (n + 1)) [Inhabited (α Fin2.fz)] : Inhabited (last α) :=
⟨show α Fin2.fz from default⟩
theorem drop_append1 {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} {i : Fin2 n} : drop (append1 α β) i = α i :=
rfl
theorem drop_append1' {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} : drop (append1 α β) = α :=
funext fun _ => drop_append1
theorem last_append1 {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} : last (append1 α β) = β :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem append1_drop_last (α : TypeVec (n + 1)) : append1 (drop α) (last α) = α :=
funext fun i => by cases i <;> rfl
/-- cases on `(n+1)-length` vectors -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def append1Cases {C : TypeVec (n + 1) → Sort u} (H : ∀ α β, C (append1 α β)) (γ) : C γ := by
rw [← @append1_drop_last _ γ]; apply H
@[simp]
theorem append1_cases_append1 {C : TypeVec (n + 1) → Sort u} (H : ∀ α β, C (append1 α β)) (α β) :
@append1Cases _ C H (append1 α β) = H α β :=
rfl
/-- append an arrow and a function for arbitrary source and target type vectors -/
def splitFun {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : drop α ⟹ drop α') (g : last α → last α') : α ⟹ α'
| Fin2.fs i => f i
| Fin2.fz => g
/-- append an arrow and a function as well as their respective source and target types / typevecs -/
def appendFun {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} (f : α ⟹ α') (g : β → β') :
append1 α β ⟹ append1 α' β' :=
splitFun f g
@[inherit_doc] infixl:0 " ::: " => appendFun
/-- split off the prefix of an arrow -/
def dropFun {α β : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : α ⟹ β) : drop α ⟹ drop β := fun i => f i.fs
/-- split off the last function of an arrow -/
def lastFun {α β : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : α ⟹ β) : last α → last β :=
f Fin2.fz
/-- arrow in the category of `0-length` vectors -/
def nilFun {α : TypeVec 0} {β : TypeVec 0} : α ⟹ β := fun i => by apply Fin2.elim0 i
theorem eq_of_drop_last_eq {α β : TypeVec (n + 1)} {f g : α ⟹ β} (h₀ : dropFun f = dropFun g)
(h₁ : lastFun f = lastFun g) : f = g := by
refine funext (fun x => ?_)
cases x
· apply h₁
· apply congr_fun h₀
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_splitFun {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : drop α ⟹ drop α') (g : last α → last α') :
dropFun (splitFun f g) = f :=
rfl
/-- turn an equality into an arrow -/
def Arrow.mp {α β : TypeVec n} (h : α = β) : α ⟹ β
| _ => Eq.mp (congr_fun h _)
/-- turn an equality into an arrow, with reverse direction -/
def Arrow.mpr {α β : TypeVec n} (h : α = β) : β ⟹ α
| _ => Eq.mpr (congr_fun h _)
/-- decompose a vector into its prefix appended with its last element -/
def toAppend1DropLast {α : TypeVec (n + 1)} : α ⟹ (drop α ::: last α) :=
Arrow.mpr (append1_drop_last _)
/-- stitch two bits of a vector back together -/
def fromAppend1DropLast {α : TypeVec (n + 1)} : (drop α ::: last α) ⟹ α :=
Arrow.mp (append1_drop_last _)
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_splitFun {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : drop α ⟹ drop α') (g : last α → last α') :
lastFun (splitFun f g) = g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_appendFun {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} (f : α ⟹ α') (g : β → β') :
dropFun (f ::: g) = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_appendFun {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} (f : α ⟹ α') (g : β → β') :
lastFun (f ::: g) = g :=
rfl
theorem split_dropFun_lastFun {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : α ⟹ α') :
splitFun (dropFun f) (lastFun f) = f :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
theorem splitFun_inj {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} {f f' : drop α ⟹ drop α'} {g g' : last α → last α'}
(H : splitFun f g = splitFun f' g') : f = f' ∧ g = g' := by
rw [← dropFun_splitFun f g, H, ← lastFun_splitFun f g, H]; simp
theorem appendFun_inj {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} {f f' : α ⟹ α'} {g g' : β → β'} :
(f ::: g : (α ::: β) ⟹ _) = (f' ::: g' : (α ::: β) ⟹ _)
→ f = f' ∧ g = g' :=
splitFun_inj
theorem splitFun_comp {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f₀ : drop α₀ ⟹ drop α₁)
(f₁ : drop α₁ ⟹ drop α₂) (g₀ : last α₀ → last α₁) (g₁ : last α₁ → last α₂) :
splitFun (f₁ ⊚ f₀) (g₁ ∘ g₀) = splitFun f₁ g₁ ⊚ splitFun f₀ g₀ :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
theorem appendFun_comp_splitFun {α γ : TypeVec n} {β δ : Type*} {ε : TypeVec (n + 1)}
(f₀ : drop ε ⟹ α) (f₁ : α ⟹ γ) (g₀ : last ε → β) (g₁ : β → δ) :
appendFun f₁ g₁ ⊚ splitFun f₀ g₀ = splitFun (α' := γ.append1 δ) (f₁ ⊚ f₀) (g₁ ∘ g₀) :=
(splitFun_comp _ _ _ _).symm
theorem appendFun_comp {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec n}
{β₀ β₁ β₂ : Type*}
(f₀ : α₀ ⟹ α₁) (f₁ : α₁ ⟹ α₂)
(g₀ : β₀ → β₁) (g₁ : β₁ → β₂) :
(f₁ ⊚ f₀ ::: g₁ ∘ g₀) = (f₁ ::: g₁) ⊚ (f₀ ::: g₀) :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
theorem appendFun_comp' {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec n} {β₀ β₁ β₂ : Type*}
(f₀ : α₀ ⟹ α₁) (f₁ : α₁ ⟹ α₂) (g₀ : β₀ → β₁) (g₁ : β₁ → β₂) :
(f₁ ::: g₁) ⊚ (f₀ ::: g₀) = (f₁ ⊚ f₀ ::: g₁ ∘ g₀) :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
theorem nilFun_comp {α₀ : TypeVec 0} (f₀ : α₀ ⟹ Fin2.elim0) : nilFun ⊚ f₀ = f₀ :=
funext Fin2.elim0
theorem appendFun_comp_id {α : TypeVec n} {β₀ β₁ β₂ : Type u} (g₀ : β₀ → β₁) (g₁ : β₁ → β₂) :
(@id _ α ::: g₁ ∘ g₀) = (id ::: g₁) ⊚ (id ::: g₀) :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
@[simp]
theorem dropFun_comp {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f₀ : α₀ ⟹ α₁) (f₁ : α₁ ⟹ α₂) :
dropFun (f₁ ⊚ f₀) = dropFun f₁ ⊚ dropFun f₀ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lastFun_comp {α₀ α₁ α₂ : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f₀ : α₀ ⟹ α₁) (f₁ : α₁ ⟹ α₂) :
lastFun (f₁ ⊚ f₀) = lastFun f₁ ∘ lastFun f₀ :=
rfl
theorem appendFun_aux {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} (f : (α ::: β) ⟹ (α' ::: β')) :
(dropFun f ::: lastFun f) = f :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
theorem appendFun_id_id {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} :
(@TypeVec.id n α ::: @_root_.id β) = TypeVec.id :=
eq_of_drop_last_eq rfl rfl
instance subsingleton0 : Subsingleton (TypeVec 0) :=
⟨fun _ _ => funext Fin2.elim0⟩
-- See `Mathlib.Tactic.Attr.Register` for `register_simp_attr typevec`
/-- cases distinction for 0-length type vector -/
protected def casesNil {β : TypeVec 0 → Sort*} (f : β Fin2.elim0) : ∀ v, β v :=
fun v => cast (by congr; funext i; cases i) f
/-- cases distinction for (n+1)-length type vector -/
protected def casesCons (n : ℕ) {β : TypeVec (n + 1) → Sort*}
(f : ∀ (t) (v : TypeVec n), β (v ::: t)) :
∀ v, β v :=
fun v : TypeVec (n + 1) => cast (by simp) (f v.last v.drop)
protected theorem casesNil_append1 {β : TypeVec 0 → Sort*} (f : β Fin2.elim0) :
TypeVec.casesNil f Fin2.elim0 = f :=
rfl
|
protected theorem casesCons_append1 (n : ℕ) {β : TypeVec (n + 1) → Sort*}
| Mathlib/Data/TypeVec.lean | 266 | 267 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Stuart Presnell. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Stuart Presnell
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PrimeFin
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
/-!
# Basic lemmas on prime factorizations
-/
open Finset List Finsupp
namespace Nat
variable {a b m n p : ℕ}
/-! ### Basic facts about factorization -/
/-! ## Lemmas characterising when `n.factorization p = 0` -/
theorem factorization_eq_zero_of_lt {n p : ℕ} (h : n < p) : n.factorization p = 0 :=
Finsupp.not_mem_support_iff.mp (mt le_of_mem_primeFactors (not_le_of_lt h))
@[simp]
theorem factorization_one_right (n : ℕ) : n.factorization 1 = 0 :=
factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime _ not_prime_one
theorem dvd_of_factorization_pos {n p : ℕ} (hn : n.factorization p ≠ 0) : p ∣ n :=
dvd_of_mem_primeFactorsList <| mem_primeFactors_iff_mem_primeFactorsList.1 <| mem_support_iff.2 hn
theorem factorization_eq_zero_iff_remainder {p r : ℕ} (i : ℕ) (pp : p.Prime) (hr0 : r ≠ 0) :
¬p ∣ r ↔ (p * i + r).factorization p = 0 := by
refine ⟨factorization_eq_zero_of_remainder i, fun h => ?_⟩
rw [factorization_eq_zero_iff] at h
contrapose! h
refine ⟨pp, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [← Nat.dvd_add_iff_right (dvd_mul_right p i)]
· contrapose! hr0
exact (add_eq_zero.1 hr0).2
/-- The only numbers with empty prime factorization are `0` and `1` -/
theorem factorization_eq_zero_iff' (n : ℕ) : n.factorization = 0 ↔ n = 0 ∨ n = 1 := by
rw [factorization_eq_primeFactorsList_multiset n]
simp [factorization, AddEquiv.map_eq_zero_iff, Multiset.coe_eq_zero]
/-! ## Lemmas about factorizations of products and powers -/
/-- A product over `n.factorization` can be written as a product over `n.primeFactors`; -/
lemma prod_factorization_eq_prod_primeFactors {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (f : ℕ → ℕ → β) :
n.factorization.prod f = ∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, f p (n.factorization p) := rfl
/-- A product over `n.primeFactors` can be written as a product over `n.factorization`; -/
lemma prod_primeFactors_prod_factorization {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (f : ℕ → β) :
∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, f p = n.factorization.prod (fun p _ ↦ f p) := rfl
/-! ## Lemmas about factorizations of primes and prime powers -/
/-- The multiplicity of prime `p` in `p` is `1` -/
@[simp]
theorem Prime.factorization_self {p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) : p.factorization p = 1 := by simp [hp]
/-- If the factorization of `n` contains just one number `p` then `n` is a power of `p` -/
theorem eq_pow_of_factorization_eq_single {n p k : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0)
(h : n.factorization = Finsupp.single p k) : n = p ^ k := by
rw [← Nat.factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hn, h]
simp
/-- The only prime factor of prime `p` is `p` itself. -/
theorem Prime.eq_of_factorization_pos {p q : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) (h : p.factorization q ≠ 0) :
p = q := by simpa [hp.factorization, single_apply] using h
/-! ### Equivalence between `ℕ+` and `ℕ →₀ ℕ` with support in the primes. -/
theorem eq_factorization_iff {n : ℕ} {f : ℕ →₀ ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hf : ∀ p ∈ f.support, Prime p) :
f = n.factorization ↔ f.prod (· ^ ·) = n :=
⟨fun h => by rw [h, factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hn], fun h => by
rw [← h, prod_pow_factorization_eq_self hf]⟩
theorem factorizationEquiv_inv_apply {f : ℕ →₀ ℕ} (hf : ∀ p ∈ f.support, Prime p) :
(factorizationEquiv.symm ⟨f, hf⟩).1 = f.prod (· ^ ·) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ordProj_of_not_prime (n p : ℕ) (hp : ¬p.Prime) : ordProj[p] n = 1 := by
simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n hp]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_proj_of_not_prime := ordProj_of_not_prime
@[simp]
theorem ordCompl_of_not_prime (n p : ℕ) (hp : ¬p.Prime) : ordCompl[p] n = n := by
simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n hp]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_of_not_prime := ordCompl_of_not_prime
theorem ordCompl_dvd (n p : ℕ) : ordCompl[p] n ∣ n :=
div_dvd_of_dvd (ordProj_dvd n p)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_dvd := ordCompl_dvd
theorem ordProj_pos (n p : ℕ) : 0 < ordProj[p] n := by
if pp : p.Prime then simp [pow_pos pp.pos] else simp [pp]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_proj_pos := ordProj_pos
theorem ordProj_le {n : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : ordProj[p] n ≤ n :=
le_of_dvd hn.bot_lt (Nat.ordProj_dvd n p)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_proj_le := ordProj_le
theorem ordCompl_pos {n : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : 0 < ordCompl[p] n := by
if pp : p.Prime then
exact Nat.div_pos (ordProj_le p hn) (ordProj_pos n p)
else
simpa [Nat.factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n pp] using hn.bot_lt
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_pos := ordCompl_pos
theorem ordCompl_le (n p : ℕ) : ordCompl[p] n ≤ n :=
Nat.div_le_self _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_le := ordCompl_le
theorem ordProj_mul_ordCompl_eq_self (n p : ℕ) : ordProj[p] n * ordCompl[p] n = n :=
Nat.mul_div_cancel' (ordProj_dvd n p)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias ord_proj_mul_ord_compl_eq_self := ordProj_mul_ordCompl_eq_self
theorem ordProj_mul {a b : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
ordProj[p] (a * b) = ordProj[p] a * ordProj[p] b := by
simp [factorization_mul ha hb, pow_add]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_proj_mul := ordProj_mul
theorem ordCompl_mul (a b p : ℕ) : ordCompl[p] (a * b) = ordCompl[p] a * ordCompl[p] b := by
if ha : a = 0 then simp [ha] else
if hb : b = 0 then simp [hb] else
simp only [ordProj_mul p ha hb]
rw [div_mul_div_comm (ordProj_dvd a p) (ordProj_dvd b p)]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias ord_compl_mul := ordCompl_mul
/-! ### Factorization and divisibility -/
/-- A crude upper bound on `n.factorization p` -/
theorem factorization_lt {n : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : n.factorization p < n := by
by_cases pp : p.Prime
· exact (Nat.pow_lt_pow_iff_right pp.one_lt).1 <| (ordProj_le p hn).trans_lt <|
Nat.lt_pow_self pp.one_lt
· simpa only [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n pp] using hn.bot_lt
/-- An upper bound on `n.factorization p` -/
theorem factorization_le_of_le_pow {n p b : ℕ} (hb : n ≤ p ^ b) : n.factorization p ≤ b := by
if hn : n = 0 then simp [hn] else
if pp : p.Prime then
exact (Nat.pow_le_pow_iff_right pp.one_lt).1 ((ordProj_le p hn).trans hb)
else
simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n pp]
theorem factorization_prime_le_iff_dvd {d n : ℕ} (hd : d ≠ 0) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → d.factorization p ≤ n.factorization p) ↔ d ∣ n := by
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd hd hn]
refine ⟨fun h p => (em p.Prime).elim (h p) fun hp => ?_, fun h p _ => h p⟩
simp_rw [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime _ hp]
rfl
theorem factorization_le_factorization_mul_left {a b : ℕ} (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a.factorization ≤ (a * b).factorization := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha)
· simp
rw [factorization_le_iff_dvd ha <| mul_ne_zero ha hb]
exact Dvd.intro b rfl
theorem factorization_le_factorization_mul_right {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
b.factorization ≤ (a * b).factorization := by
rw [mul_comm]
apply factorization_le_factorization_mul_left ha
theorem Prime.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization {p k n : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
p ^ k ∣ n ↔ k ≤ n.factorization p := by
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd (pow_pos pp.pos k).ne' hn, pp.factorization_pow, single_le_iff]
theorem Prime.pow_dvd_iff_dvd_ordProj {p k n : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
p ^ k ∣ n ↔ p ^ k ∣ ordProj[p] n := by
rw [pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right pp.one_lt, pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias Prime.pow_dvd_iff_dvd_ord_proj := Prime.pow_dvd_iff_dvd_ordProj
theorem Prime.dvd_iff_one_le_factorization {p n : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
p ∣ n ↔ 1 ≤ n.factorization p :=
Iff.trans (by simp) (pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn)
theorem exists_factorization_lt_of_lt {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hab : a < b) :
∃ p : ℕ, a.factorization p < b.factorization p := by
have hb : b ≠ 0 := (ha.bot_lt.trans hab).ne'
contrapose! hab
rw [← Finsupp.le_def, factorization_le_iff_dvd hb ha] at hab
exact le_of_dvd ha.bot_lt hab
@[simp]
theorem factorization_div {d n : ℕ} (h : d ∣ n) :
(n / d).factorization = n.factorization - d.factorization := by
rcases eq_or_ne d 0 with (rfl | hd); · simp [zero_dvd_iff.mp h]
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn); · simp [tsub_eq_zero_of_le]
apply add_left_injective d.factorization
simp only
rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le <| (Nat.factorization_le_iff_dvd hd hn).mpr h, ←
Nat.factorization_mul (Nat.div_pos (Nat.le_of_dvd hn.bot_lt h) hd.bot_lt).ne' hd,
Nat.div_mul_cancel h]
theorem dvd_ordProj_of_dvd {n p : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (pp : p.Prime) (h : p ∣ n) : p ∣ ordProj[p] n :=
dvd_pow_self p (Prime.factorization_pos_of_dvd pp hn h).ne'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias dvd_ord_proj_of_dvd := dvd_ordProj_of_dvd
theorem not_dvd_ordCompl {n p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) : ¬p ∣ ordCompl[p] n := by
rw [Nat.Prime.dvd_iff_one_le_factorization hp (ordCompl_pos p hn).ne']
rw [Nat.factorization_div (Nat.ordProj_dvd n p)]
simp [hp.factorization]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias not_dvd_ord_compl := not_dvd_ordCompl
theorem coprime_ordCompl {n p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) : Coprime p (ordCompl[p] n) :=
(or_iff_left (not_dvd_ordCompl hp hn)).mp <| coprime_or_dvd_of_prime hp _
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias coprime_ord_compl := coprime_ordCompl
theorem factorization_ordCompl (n p : ℕ) :
(ordCompl[p] n).factorization = n.factorization.erase p := by
if hn : n = 0 then simp [hn] else
if pp : p.Prime then ?_ else
simp [pp]
ext q
rcases eq_or_ne q p with (rfl | hqp)
· simp only [Finsupp.erase_same, factorization_eq_zero_iff, not_dvd_ordCompl pp hn]
simp
· rw [Finsupp.erase_ne hqp, factorization_div (ordProj_dvd n p)]
simp [pp.factorization, hqp.symm]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")] alias factorization_ord_compl := factorization_ordCompl
-- `ordCompl[p] n` is the largest divisor of `n` not divisible by `p`.
theorem dvd_ordCompl_of_dvd_not_dvd {p d n : ℕ} (hdn : d ∣ n) (hpd : ¬p ∣ d) :
d ∣ ordCompl[p] n := by
if hn0 : n = 0 then simp [hn0] else
if hd0 : d = 0 then simp [hd0] at hpd else
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd hd0 (ordCompl_pos p hn0).ne', factorization_ordCompl]
intro q
if hqp : q = p then
simp [factorization_eq_zero_iff, hqp, hpd]
else
simp [hqp, (factorization_le_iff_dvd hd0 hn0).2 hdn q]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias dvd_ord_compl_of_dvd_not_dvd := dvd_ordCompl_of_dvd_not_dvd
/-- If `n` is a nonzero natural number and `p ≠ 1`, then there are natural numbers `e`
and `n'` such that `n'` is not divisible by `p` and `n = p^e * n'`. -/
theorem exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (p : ℕ) (hp : p ≠ 1) :
∃ e n' : ℕ, ¬p ∣ n' ∧ n = p ^ e * n' :=
let ⟨a', h₁, h₂⟩ :=
(Nat.finiteMultiplicity_iff.mpr ⟨hp, Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn⟩).exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd
⟨_, a', h₂, h₁⟩
/-- Any nonzero natural number is the product of an odd part `m` and a power of
two `2 ^ k`. -/
theorem exists_eq_two_pow_mul_odd {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
∃ k m : ℕ, Odd m ∧ n = 2 ^ k * m :=
let ⟨k, m, hm, hn⟩ := exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd hn 2 (succ_ne_self 1)
⟨k, m, not_even_iff_odd.1 (mt Even.two_dvd hm), hn⟩
theorem dvd_iff_div_factorization_eq_tsub {d n : ℕ} (hd : d ≠ 0) (hdn : d ≤ n) :
d ∣ n ↔ (n / d).factorization = n.factorization - d.factorization := by
refine ⟨factorization_div, ?_⟩
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hdn with (rfl | hd_lt_n); · simp
have h1 : n / d ≠ 0 := by simp [*]
intro h
rw [dvd_iff_le_div_mul n d]
by_contra h2
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := exists_factorization_lt_of_lt (mul_ne_zero h1 hd) (not_le.mp h2)
rwa [factorization_mul h1 hd, add_apply, ← lt_tsub_iff_right, h, tsub_apply,
lt_self_iff_false] at hp
theorem ordProj_dvd_ordProj_of_dvd {a b : ℕ} (hb0 : b ≠ 0) (hab : a ∣ b) (p : ℕ) :
ordProj[p] a ∣ ordProj[p] b := by
rcases em' p.Prime with (pp | pp); · simp [pp]
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha0); · simp
rw [pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right pp.one_lt]
exact (factorization_le_iff_dvd ha0 hb0).2 hab p
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias ord_proj_dvd_ord_proj_of_dvd := ordProj_dvd_ordProj_of_dvd
theorem ordProj_dvd_ordProj_iff_dvd {a b : ℕ} (ha0 : a ≠ 0) (hb0 : b ≠ 0) :
(∀ p : ℕ, ordProj[p] a ∣ ordProj[p] b) ↔ a ∣ b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun hab p => ordProj_dvd_ordProj_of_dvd hb0 hab p⟩
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd ha0 hb0]
intro q
rcases le_or_lt q 1 with (hq_le | hq1)
· interval_cases q <;> simp
exact (pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right hq1).1 (h q)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias ord_proj_dvd_ord_proj_iff_dvd := ordProj_dvd_ordProj_iff_dvd
theorem ordCompl_dvd_ordCompl_of_dvd {a b : ℕ} (hab : a ∣ b) (p : ℕ) :
ordCompl[p] a ∣ ordCompl[p] b := by
rcases em' p.Prime with (pp | pp)
· simp [pp, hab]
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb0)
· simp
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha0)
· cases hb0 (zero_dvd_iff.1 hab)
have ha := (Nat.div_pos (ordProj_le p ha0) (ordProj_pos a p)).ne'
have hb := (Nat.div_pos (ordProj_le p hb0) (ordProj_pos b p)).ne'
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd ha hb, factorization_ordCompl a p, factorization_ordCompl b p]
intro q
rcases eq_or_ne q p with (rfl | hqp)
· simp
simp_rw [erase_ne hqp]
exact (factorization_le_iff_dvd ha0 hb0).2 hab q
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias ord_compl_dvd_ord_compl_of_dvd := ordCompl_dvd_ordCompl_of_dvd
theorem ordCompl_dvd_ordCompl_iff_dvd (a b : ℕ) :
(∀ p : ℕ, ordCompl[p] a ∣ ordCompl[p] b) ↔ a ∣ b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun hab p => ordCompl_dvd_ordCompl_of_dvd hab p⟩
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb0)
· simp
if pa : a.Prime then ?_ else simpa [pa] using h a
if pb : b.Prime then ?_ else simpa [pb] using h b
rw [prime_dvd_prime_iff_eq pa pb]
by_contra hab
apply pa.ne_one
rw [← Nat.dvd_one, ← Nat.mul_dvd_mul_iff_left hb0.bot_lt, mul_one]
simpa [Prime.factorization_self pb, Prime.factorization pa, hab] using h b
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-24")]
alias ord_compl_dvd_ord_compl_iff_dvd := ordCompl_dvd_ordCompl_iff_dvd
theorem dvd_iff_prime_pow_dvd_dvd (n d : ℕ) :
d ∣ n ↔ ∀ p k : ℕ, Prime p → p ^ k ∣ d → p ^ k ∣ n := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
rcases eq_or_ne d 0 with (rfl | hd)
· simp only [zero_dvd_iff, hn, false_iff, not_forall]
exact ⟨2, n, prime_two, dvd_zero _, mt (le_of_dvd hn.bot_lt) (n.lt_two_pow_self).not_le⟩
refine ⟨fun h p k _ hpkd => dvd_trans hpkd h, ?_⟩
rw [← factorization_prime_le_iff_dvd hd hn]
intro h p pp
simp_rw [← pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn]
exact h p _ pp (ordProj_dvd _ _)
theorem prod_primeFactors_dvd (n : ℕ) : ∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, p ∣ n := by
by_cases hn : n = 0
· subst hn
simp
· simpa [prod_primeFactorsList hn] using (n.primeFactorsList : Multiset ℕ).toFinset_prod_dvd_prod
theorem factorization_gcd {a b : ℕ} (ha_pos : a ≠ 0) (hb_pos : b ≠ 0) :
(gcd a b).factorization = a.factorization ⊓ b.factorization := by
let dfac := a.factorization ⊓ b.factorization
let d := dfac.prod (· ^ ·)
have dfac_prime : ∀ p : ℕ, p ∈ dfac.support → Prime p := by
intro p hp
have : p ∈ a.primeFactorsList ∧ p ∈ b.primeFactorsList := by simpa [dfac] using hp
exact prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList this.1
have h1 : d.factorization = dfac := prod_pow_factorization_eq_self dfac_prime
have hd_pos : d ≠ 0 := (factorizationEquiv.invFun ⟨dfac, dfac_prime⟩).2.ne'
suffices d = gcd a b by rwa [← this]
apply gcd_greatest
· rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd hd_pos ha_pos, h1]
exact inf_le_left
· rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd hd_pos hb_pos, h1]
exact inf_le_right
· intro e hea heb
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne e 0 with (rfl | he_pos)
· simp only [zero_dvd_iff] at hea
contradiction
have hea' := (factorization_le_iff_dvd he_pos ha_pos).mpr hea
have heb' := (factorization_le_iff_dvd he_pos hb_pos).mpr heb
simp [dfac, ← factorization_le_iff_dvd he_pos hd_pos, h1, hea', heb']
theorem factorization_lcm {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
(a.lcm b).factorization = a.factorization ⊔ b.factorization := by
rw [← add_right_inj (a.gcd b).factorization, ←
factorization_mul (mt gcd_eq_zero_iff.1 fun h => ha h.1) (lcm_ne_zero ha hb), gcd_mul_lcm,
factorization_gcd ha hb, factorization_mul ha hb]
ext1
exact (min_add_max _ _).symm
variable (a b)
@[simp]
lemma factorizationLCMLeft_zero_left : factorizationLCMLeft 0 b = 1 := by
simp [factorizationLCMLeft]
@[simp]
lemma factorizationLCMLeft_zero_right : factorizationLCMLeft a 0 = 1 := by
simp [factorizationLCMLeft]
@[simp]
lemma factorizationLCRight_zero_left : factorizationLCMRight 0 b = 1 := by
simp [factorizationLCMRight]
@[simp]
lemma factorizationLCMRight_zero_right : factorizationLCMRight a 0 = 1 := by
simp [factorizationLCMRight]
lemma factorizationLCMLeft_pos :
0 < factorizationLCMLeft a b := by
apply Nat.pos_of_ne_zero
rw [factorizationLCMLeft, Finsupp.prod_ne_zero_iff]
intro p _ H
by_cases h : b.factorization p ≤ a.factorization p
· simp only [h, reduceIte, pow_eq_zero_iff', ne_eq] at H
simpa [H.1] using H.2
· simp only [h, reduceIte, one_ne_zero] at H
lemma factorizationLCMRight_pos :
0 < factorizationLCMRight a b := by
apply Nat.pos_of_ne_zero
rw [factorizationLCMRight, Finsupp.prod_ne_zero_iff]
intro p _ H
by_cases h : b.factorization p ≤ a.factorization p
· simp only [h, reduceIte, pow_eq_zero_iff', ne_eq, reduceCtorEq] at H
· simp only [h, ↓reduceIte, pow_eq_zero_iff', ne_eq] at H
simpa [H.1] using H.2
lemma coprime_factorizationLCMLeft_factorizationLCMRight :
(factorizationLCMLeft a b).Coprime (factorizationLCMRight a b) := by
rw [factorizationLCMLeft, factorizationLCMRight]
refine coprime_prod_left_iff.mpr fun p hp ↦ coprime_prod_right_iff.mpr fun q hq ↦ ?_
dsimp only; split_ifs with h h'
any_goals simp only [coprime_one_right_eq_true, coprime_one_left_eq_true]
refine coprime_pow_primes _ _ (prime_of_mem_primeFactors hp) (prime_of_mem_primeFactors hq) ?_
contrapose! h'; rwa [← h']
variable {a b}
lemma factorizationLCMLeft_mul_factorizationLCMRight (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
(factorizationLCMLeft a b) * (factorizationLCMRight a b) = lcm a b := by
rw [← factorization_prod_pow_eq_self (lcm_ne_zero ha hb), factorizationLCMLeft,
factorizationLCMRight, ← prod_mul]
congr; ext p n; split_ifs <;> simp
variable (a b)
lemma factorizationLCMLeft_dvd_left : factorizationLCMLeft a b ∣ a := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with rfl | ha
· simp only [dvd_zero]
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with rfl | hb
· simp [factorizationLCMLeft]
nth_rewrite 2 [← factorization_prod_pow_eq_self ha]
rw [prod_of_support_subset (s := (lcm a b).factorization.support)]
· apply prod_dvd_prod_of_dvd; rintro p -; dsimp only; split_ifs with le
· rw [factorization_lcm ha hb]; apply pow_dvd_pow; exact sup_le le_rfl le
· apply one_dvd
· intro p hp; rw [mem_support_iff] at hp ⊢
rw [factorization_lcm ha hb]; exact (lt_sup_iff.mpr <| .inl <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hp).ne'
· intros; rw [pow_zero]
lemma factorizationLCMRight_dvd_right : factorizationLCMRight a b ∣ b := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with rfl | ha
· simp [factorizationLCMRight]
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with rfl | hb
· simp only [dvd_zero]
nth_rewrite 2 [← factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hb]
rw [prod_of_support_subset (s := (lcm a b).factorization.support)]
· apply Finset.prod_dvd_prod_of_dvd; rintro p -; dsimp only; split_ifs with le
· apply one_dvd
· rw [factorization_lcm ha hb]; apply pow_dvd_pow; exact sup_le (not_le.1 le).le le_rfl
· intro p hp; rw [mem_support_iff] at hp ⊢
rw [factorization_lcm ha hb]; exact (lt_sup_iff.mpr <| .inr <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hp).ne'
· intros; rw [pow_zero]
@[to_additive sum_primeFactors_gcd_add_sum_primeFactors_mul]
theorem prod_primeFactors_gcd_mul_prod_primeFactors_mul {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (m n : ℕ)
(f : ℕ → β) :
(m.gcd n).primeFactors.prod f * (m * n).primeFactors.prod f =
m.primeFactors.prod f * n.primeFactors.prod f := by
obtain rfl | hm₀ := eq_or_ne m 0
· simp
obtain rfl | hn₀ := eq_or_ne n 0
· simp
· rw [primeFactors_mul hm₀ hn₀, primeFactors_gcd hm₀ hn₀, mul_comm, Finset.prod_union_inter]
theorem setOf_pow_dvd_eq_Icc_factorization {n p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
{ i : ℕ | i ≠ 0 ∧ p ^ i ∣ n } = Set.Icc 1 (n.factorization p) := by
ext
simp [Nat.lt_succ_iff, one_le_iff_ne_zero, pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn]
/-- The set of positive powers of prime `p` that divide `n` is exactly the set of
positive natural numbers up to `n.factorization p`. -/
theorem Icc_factorization_eq_pow_dvd (n : ℕ) {p : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) :
Icc 1 (n.factorization p) = {i ∈ Ico 1 n | p ^ i ∣ n} := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
ext x
simp only [mem_Icc, Finset.mem_filter, mem_Ico, and_assoc, and_congr_right_iff,
pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn, iff_and_self]
exact fun _ H => lt_of_le_of_lt H (factorization_lt p hn)
theorem factorization_eq_card_pow_dvd (n : ℕ) {p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) :
n.factorization p = #{i ∈ Ico 1 n | p ^ i ∣ n} := by
simp [← Icc_factorization_eq_pow_dvd n pp]
theorem Ico_filter_pow_dvd_eq {n p b : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (hn : n ≠ 0) (hb : n ≤ p ^ b) :
{i ∈ Ico 1 n | p ^ i ∣ n} = {i ∈ Icc 1 b | p ^ i ∣ n} := by
ext x
simp only [Finset.mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Icc, and_congr_left_iff, and_congr_right_iff]
rintro h1 -
exact iff_of_true (lt_of_pow_dvd_right hn pp.two_le h1) <|
(Nat.pow_le_pow_iff_right pp.one_lt).1 <| (le_of_dvd hn.bot_lt h1).trans hb
/-! ### Factorization and coprimes -/
/-- If `p` is a prime factor of `a` then the power of `p` in `a` is the same that in `a * b`,
for any `b` coprime to `a`. -/
theorem factorization_eq_of_coprime_left {p a b : ℕ} (hab : Coprime a b)
(hpa : p ∈ a.primeFactorsList) : (a * b).factorization p = a.factorization p := by
rw [factorization_mul_apply_of_coprime hab, ← primeFactorsList_count_eq,
← primeFactorsList_count_eq,
count_eq_zero_of_not_mem (coprime_primeFactorsList_disjoint hab hpa), add_zero]
/-- If `p` is a prime factor of `b` then the power of `p` in `b` is the same that in `a * b`,
for any `a` coprime to `b`. -/
theorem factorization_eq_of_coprime_right {p a b : ℕ} (hab : Coprime a b)
(hpb : p ∈ b.primeFactorsList) : (a * b).factorization p = b.factorization p := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact factorization_eq_of_coprime_left (coprime_comm.mp hab) hpb
/-- Two positive naturals are equal if their prime padic valuations are equal -/
theorem eq_iff_prime_padicValNat_eq (a b : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a = b ↔ ∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → padicValNat p a = padicValNat p b := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
simp
· intro h
refine eq_of_factorization_eq ha hb fun p => ?_
by_cases pp : p.Prime
· simp [factorization_def, pp, h p pp]
· simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime, pp]
theorem prod_pow_prime_padicValNat (n : Nat) (hn : n ≠ 0) (m : Nat) (pr : n < m) :
∏ p ∈ range m with p.Prime, p ^ padicValNat p n = n := by
nth_rw 2 [← factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hn]
rw [eq_comm]
apply Finset.prod_subset_one_on_sdiff
· exact fun p hp => Finset.mem_filter.mpr ⟨Finset.mem_range.2 <| pr.trans_le' <|
le_of_mem_primeFactors hp, prime_of_mem_primeFactors hp⟩
· intro p hp
obtain ⟨hp1, hp2⟩ := Finset.mem_sdiff.mp hp
rw [← factorization_def n (Finset.mem_filter.mp hp1).2]
simp [Finsupp.not_mem_support_iff.mp hp2]
· intro p hp
simp [factorization_def n (prime_of_mem_primeFactors hp)]
/-! ### Lemmas about factorizations of particular functions -/
-- TODO: Port lemmas from `Data/Nat/Multiplicity` to here, re-written in terms of `factorization`
/-- Exactly `n / p` naturals in `[1, n]` are multiples of `p`.
See `Nat.card_multiples'` for an alternative spelling of the statement. -/
theorem card_multiples (n p : ℕ) : #{e ∈ range n | p ∣ e + 1} = n / p := by
induction' n with n hn
· simp
simp [Nat.succ_div, add_ite, add_zero, Finset.range_succ, filter_insert, apply_ite card,
card_insert_of_not_mem, hn]
/-- Exactly `n / p` naturals in `(0, n]` are multiples of `p`. -/
theorem Ioc_filter_dvd_card_eq_div (n p : ℕ) : #{x ∈ Ioc 0 n | p ∣ x} = n / p := by
induction' n with n IH
· simp
-- TODO: Golf away `h1` after Yaël PRs a lemma asserting this
have h1 : Ioc 0 n.succ = insert n.succ (Ioc 0 n) := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hn)
· simp
simp_rw [← Ico_succ_succ, Ico_insert_right (succ_le_succ hn.le), Ico_succ_right]
simp [Nat.succ_div, add_ite, add_zero, h1, filter_insert, apply_ite card, card_insert_eq_ite, IH,
Finset.mem_filter, mem_Ioc, not_le.2 (lt_add_one n)]
/-- There are exactly `⌊N/n⌋` positive multiples of `n` that are `≤ N`.
See `Nat.card_multiples` for a "shifted-by-one" version. -/
lemma card_multiples' (N n : ℕ) : #{k ∈ range N.succ | k ≠ 0 ∧ n ∣ k} = N / n := by
induction N with
| zero => simp [Finset.filter_false_of_mem]
| succ N ih =>
rw [Finset.range_succ, Finset.filter_insert]
by_cases h : n ∣ N.succ
· simp [h, succ_div_of_dvd, ih]
· simp [h, succ_div_of_not_dvd, ih]
end Nat
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Factorization/Basic.lean | 767 | 775 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Piecewise
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.UnorderedInterval
/-!
# Intervals in `pi`-space
In this we prove various simple lemmas about intervals in `Π i, α i`. Closed intervals (`Ici x`,
`Iic x`, `Icc x y`) are equal to products of their projections to `α i`, while (semi-)open intervals
usually include the corresponding products as proper subsets.
-/
-- Porting note: Added, since dot notation no longer works on `Function.update`
open Function
variable {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*}
namespace Set
section PiPreorder
variable [∀ i, Preorder (α i)] (x y : ∀ i, α i)
@[simp]
theorem pi_univ_Ici : (pi univ fun i ↦ Ici (x i)) = Ici x :=
ext fun y ↦ by simp [Pi.le_def]
@[simp]
theorem pi_univ_Iic : (pi univ fun i ↦ Iic (x i)) = Iic x :=
ext fun y ↦ by simp [Pi.le_def]
@[simp]
theorem pi_univ_Icc : (pi univ fun i ↦ Icc (x i) (y i)) = Icc x y :=
ext fun y ↦ by simp [Pi.le_def, forall_and]
| theorem piecewise_mem_Icc {s : Set ι} [∀ j, Decidable (j ∈ s)] {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : ∀ i, α i}
(h₁ : ∀ i ∈ s, f₁ i ∈ Icc (g₁ i) (g₂ i)) (h₂ : ∀ i ∉ s, f₂ i ∈ Icc (g₁ i) (g₂ i)) :
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Set/Pi.lean | 43 | 44 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Divisibility.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Nilpotent
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Engel
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Eigenspace.Pi
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Artinian.Module
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Trace
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.PID
/-!
# Weight spaces of Lie modules of nilpotent Lie algebras
Just as a key tool when studying the behaviour of a linear operator is to decompose the space on
which it acts into a sum of (generalised) eigenspaces, a key tool when studying a representation `M`
of Lie algebra `L` is to decompose `M` into a sum of simultaneous eigenspaces of `x` as `x` ranges
over `L`. These simultaneous generalised eigenspaces are known as the weight spaces of `M`.
When `L` is nilpotent, it follows from the binomial theorem that weight spaces are Lie submodules.
Basic definitions and properties of the above ideas are provided in this file.
## Main definitions
* `LieModule.genWeightSpaceOf`
* `LieModule.genWeightSpace`
* `LieModule.Weight`
* `LieModule.posFittingCompOf`
* `LieModule.posFittingComp`
* `LieModule.iSup_ucs_eq_genWeightSpace_zero`
* `LieModule.iInf_lowerCentralSeries_eq_posFittingComp`
* `LieModule.isCompl_genWeightSpace_zero_posFittingComp`
* `LieModule.iSupIndep_genWeightSpace`
* `LieModule.iSup_genWeightSpace_eq_top`
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, Chapters 7--9*](bourbaki1975b)
## Tags
lie character, eigenvalue, eigenspace, weight, weight vector, root, root vector
-/
variable {K R L M : Type*} [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R L]
[AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [LieRingModule L M] [LieModule R L M]
namespace LieModule
open Set Function TensorProduct LieModule
variable (M) in
/-- If `M` is a representation of a Lie algebra `L` and `χ : L → R` is a family of scalars,
then `weightSpace M χ` is the intersection of the `χ x`-eigenspaces
of the action of `x` on `M` as `x` ranges over `L`. -/
def weightSpace (χ : L → R) : LieSubmodule R L M where
__ := ⨅ x : L, (toEnd R L M x).eigenspace (χ x)
lie_mem {x m} hm := by simp_all [smul_comm (χ x)]
lemma mem_weightSpace (χ : L → R) (m : M) : m ∈ weightSpace M χ ↔ ∀ x, ⁅x, m⁆ = χ x • m := by
simp [weightSpace]
section notation_genWeightSpaceOf
/-- Until we define `LieModule.genWeightSpaceOf`, it is useful to have some notation as follows: -/
local notation3 "𝕎("M", " χ", " x")" => (toEnd R L M x).maxGenEigenspace χ
/-- See also `bourbaki1975b` Chapter VII §1.1, Proposition 2 (ii). -/
protected theorem weight_vector_multiplication (M₁ M₂ M₃ : Type*)
[AddCommGroup M₁] [Module R M₁] [LieRingModule L M₁] [LieModule R L M₁] [AddCommGroup M₂]
[Module R M₂] [LieRingModule L M₂] [LieModule R L M₂] [AddCommGroup M₃] [Module R M₃]
[LieRingModule L M₃] [LieModule R L M₃] (g : M₁ ⊗[R] M₂ →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M₃) (χ₁ χ₂ : R) (x : L) :
LinearMap.range ((g : M₁ ⊗[R] M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃).comp (mapIncl 𝕎(M₁, χ₁, x) 𝕎(M₂, χ₂, x))) ≤
𝕎(M₃, χ₁ + χ₂, x) := by
-- Unpack the statement of the goal.
intro m₃
simp only [TensorProduct.mapIncl, LinearMap.mem_range, LinearMap.coe_comp,
LieModuleHom.coe_toLinearMap, Function.comp_apply, Pi.add_apply, exists_imp,
Module.End.mem_maxGenEigenspace]
rintro t rfl
-- Set up some notation.
let F : Module.End R M₃ := toEnd R L M₃ x - (χ₁ + χ₂) • ↑1
-- The goal is linear in `t` so use induction to reduce to the case that `t` is a pure tensor.
refine t.induction_on ?_ ?_ ?_
· use 0; simp only [LinearMap.map_zero, LieModuleHom.map_zero]
swap
· rintro t₁ t₂ ⟨k₁, hk₁⟩ ⟨k₂, hk₂⟩; use max k₁ k₂
simp only [LieModuleHom.map_add, LinearMap.map_add,
Module.End.pow_map_zero_of_le (le_max_left k₁ k₂) hk₁,
Module.End.pow_map_zero_of_le (le_max_right k₁ k₂) hk₂, add_zero]
-- Now the main argument: pure tensors.
rintro ⟨m₁, hm₁⟩ ⟨m₂, hm₂⟩
change ∃ k, (F ^ k) ((g : M₁ ⊗[R] M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (m₁ ⊗ₜ m₂)) = (0 : M₃)
-- Eliminate `g` from the picture.
let f₁ : Module.End R (M₁ ⊗[R] M₂) := (toEnd R L M₁ x - χ₁ • ↑1).rTensor M₂
let f₂ : Module.End R (M₁ ⊗[R] M₂) := (toEnd R L M₂ x - χ₂ • ↑1).lTensor M₁
have h_comm_square : F ∘ₗ ↑g = (g : M₁ ⊗[R] M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃).comp (f₁ + f₂) := by
ext m₁ m₂
simp only [f₁, f₂, F, ← g.map_lie x (m₁ ⊗ₜ m₂), add_smul, sub_tmul, tmul_sub, smul_tmul,
lie_tmul_right, tmul_smul, toEnd_apply_apply, LieModuleHom.map_smul,
Module.End.one_apply, LieModuleHom.coe_toLinearMap, LinearMap.smul_apply, Function.comp_apply,
LinearMap.coe_comp, LinearMap.rTensor_tmul, LieModuleHom.map_add, LinearMap.add_apply,
LieModuleHom.map_sub, LinearMap.sub_apply, LinearMap.lTensor_tmul,
AlgebraTensorModule.curry_apply, TensorProduct.curry_apply, LinearMap.toFun_eq_coe,
LinearMap.coe_restrictScalars]
abel
rsuffices ⟨k, hk⟩ : ∃ k : ℕ, ((f₁ + f₂) ^ k) (m₁ ⊗ₜ m₂) = 0
· use k
change (F ^ k) (g.toLinearMap (m₁ ⊗ₜ[R] m₂)) = 0
rw [← LinearMap.comp_apply, Module.End.commute_pow_left_of_commute h_comm_square,
LinearMap.comp_apply, hk, LinearMap.map_zero]
-- Unpack the information we have about `m₁`, `m₂`.
simp only [Module.End.mem_maxGenEigenspace] at hm₁ hm₂
obtain ⟨k₁, hk₁⟩ := hm₁
obtain ⟨k₂, hk₂⟩ := hm₂
have hf₁ : (f₁ ^ k₁) (m₁ ⊗ₜ m₂) = 0 := by
simp only [f₁, hk₁, zero_tmul, LinearMap.rTensor_tmul, LinearMap.rTensor_pow]
have hf₂ : (f₂ ^ k₂) (m₁ ⊗ₜ m₂) = 0 := by
simp only [f₂, hk₂, tmul_zero, LinearMap.lTensor_tmul, LinearMap.lTensor_pow]
-- It's now just an application of the binomial theorem.
use k₁ + k₂ - 1
have hf_comm : Commute f₁ f₂ := by
ext m₁ m₂
simp only [f₁, f₂, Module.End.mul_apply, LinearMap.rTensor_tmul, LinearMap.lTensor_tmul,
AlgebraTensorModule.curry_apply, LinearMap.toFun_eq_coe, LinearMap.lTensor_tmul,
TensorProduct.curry_apply, LinearMap.coe_restrictScalars]
rw [hf_comm.add_pow']
simp only [TensorProduct.mapIncl, Submodule.subtype_apply, Finset.sum_apply, Submodule.coe_mk,
LinearMap.coeFn_sum, TensorProduct.map_tmul, LinearMap.smul_apply]
-- The required sum is zero because each individual term is zero.
apply Finset.sum_eq_zero
rintro ⟨i, j⟩ hij
-- Eliminate the binomial coefficients from the picture.
suffices (f₁ ^ i * f₂ ^ j) (m₁ ⊗ₜ m₂) = 0 by rw [this]; apply smul_zero
-- Finish off with appropriate case analysis.
rcases Nat.le_or_le_of_add_eq_add_pred (Finset.mem_antidiagonal.mp hij) with hi | hj
· rw [(hf_comm.pow_pow i j).eq, Module.End.mul_apply, Module.End.pow_map_zero_of_le hi hf₁,
LinearMap.map_zero]
· rw [Module.End.mul_apply, Module.End.pow_map_zero_of_le hj hf₂, LinearMap.map_zero]
lemma lie_mem_maxGenEigenspace_toEnd
{χ₁ χ₂ : R} {x y : L} {m : M} (hy : y ∈ 𝕎(L, χ₁, x)) (hm : m ∈ 𝕎(M, χ₂, x)) :
⁅y, m⁆ ∈ 𝕎(M, χ₁ + χ₂, x) := by
apply LieModule.weight_vector_multiplication L M M (toModuleHom R L M) χ₁ χ₂
simp only [LieModuleHom.coe_toLinearMap, Function.comp_apply, LinearMap.coe_comp,
TensorProduct.mapIncl, LinearMap.mem_range]
use ⟨y, hy⟩ ⊗ₜ ⟨m, hm⟩
simp only [Submodule.subtype_apply, toModuleHom_apply, TensorProduct.map_tmul]
variable (M)
/-- If `M` is a representation of a nilpotent Lie algebra `L`, `χ` is a scalar, and `x : L`, then
`genWeightSpaceOf M χ x` is the maximal generalized `χ`-eigenspace of the action of `x` on `M`.
It is a Lie submodule because `L` is nilpotent. -/
def genWeightSpaceOf [LieRing.IsNilpotent L] (χ : R) (x : L) : LieSubmodule R L M :=
{ 𝕎(M, χ, x) with
lie_mem := by
intro y m hm
simp only [AddSubsemigroup.mem_carrier, AddSubmonoid.mem_toSubsemigroup,
Submodule.mem_toAddSubmonoid] at hm ⊢
rw [← zero_add χ]
exact lie_mem_maxGenEigenspace_toEnd (by simp) hm }
end notation_genWeightSpaceOf
variable (M)
variable [LieRing.IsNilpotent L]
theorem mem_genWeightSpaceOf (χ : R) (x : L) (m : M) :
m ∈ genWeightSpaceOf M χ x ↔ ∃ k : ℕ, ((toEnd R L M x - χ • ↑1) ^ k) m = 0 := by
simp [genWeightSpaceOf]
theorem coe_genWeightSpaceOf_zero (x : L) :
↑(genWeightSpaceOf M (0 : R) x) = ⨆ k, LinearMap.ker (toEnd R L M x ^ k) := by
simp [genWeightSpaceOf, ← Module.End.iSup_genEigenspace_eq]
/-- If `M` is a representation of a nilpotent Lie algebra `L`
and `χ : L → R` is a family of scalars,
then `genWeightSpace M χ` is the intersection of the maximal generalized `χ x`-eigenspaces
of the action of `x` on `M` as `x` ranges over `L`.
It is a Lie submodule because `L` is nilpotent. -/
def genWeightSpace (χ : L → R) : LieSubmodule R L M :=
⨅ x, genWeightSpaceOf M (χ x) x
theorem mem_genWeightSpace (χ : L → R) (m : M) :
m ∈ genWeightSpace M χ ↔ ∀ x, ∃ k : ℕ, ((toEnd R L M x - χ x • ↑1) ^ k) m = 0 := by
simp [genWeightSpace, mem_genWeightSpaceOf]
lemma genWeightSpace_le_genWeightSpaceOf (x : L) (χ : L → R) :
genWeightSpace M χ ≤ genWeightSpaceOf M (χ x) x :=
iInf_le _ x
lemma weightSpace_le_genWeightSpace (χ : L → R) :
weightSpace M χ ≤ genWeightSpace M χ := by
apply le_iInf
intro x
rw [← (LieSubmodule.toSubmodule_orderEmbedding R L M).le_iff_le]
apply (iInf_le _ x).trans
exact ((toEnd R L M x).genEigenspace (χ x)).monotone le_top
variable (R L) in
/-- A weight of a Lie module is a map `L → R` such that the corresponding weight space is
non-trivial. -/
structure Weight where
/-- The family of eigenvalues corresponding to a weight. -/
toFun : L → R
genWeightSpace_ne_bot' : genWeightSpace M toFun ≠ ⊥
namespace Weight
instance instFunLike : FunLike (Weight R L M) L R where
coe χ := χ.1
coe_injective' χ₁ χ₂ h := by cases χ₁; cases χ₂; simp_all
@[simp] lemma coe_weight_mk (χ : L → R) (h) :
(↑(⟨χ, h⟩ : Weight R L M) : L → R) = χ :=
rfl
lemma genWeightSpace_ne_bot (χ : Weight R L M) : genWeightSpace M χ ≠ ⊥ := χ.genWeightSpace_ne_bot'
variable {M}
@[ext] lemma ext {χ₁ χ₂ : Weight R L M} (h : ∀ x, χ₁ x = χ₂ x) : χ₁ = χ₂ := by
obtain ⟨f₁, _⟩ := χ₁; obtain ⟨f₂, _⟩ := χ₂; aesop
lemma ext_iff' {χ₁ χ₂ : Weight R L M} : (χ₁ : L → R) = χ₂ ↔ χ₁ = χ₂ := by simp
lemma exists_ne_zero (χ : Weight R L M) :
∃ x ∈ genWeightSpace M χ, x ≠ 0 := by
simpa [LieSubmodule.eq_bot_iff] using χ.genWeightSpace_ne_bot
instance [Subsingleton M] : IsEmpty (Weight R L M) :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.2 (Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩
instance [Nontrivial (genWeightSpace M (0 : L → R))] : Zero (Weight R L M) :=
⟨0, fun e ↦ not_nontrivial (⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M) (e ▸ ‹_›)⟩
@[simp]
lemma coe_zero [Nontrivial (genWeightSpace M (0 : L → R))] : ((0 : Weight R L M) : L → R) = 0 := rfl
lemma zero_apply [Nontrivial (genWeightSpace M (0 : L → R))] (x) : (0 : Weight R L M) x = 0 := rfl
/-- The proposition that a weight of a Lie module is zero.
We make this definition because we cannot define a `Zero (Weight R L M)` instance since the weight
space of the zero function can be trivial. -/
def IsZero (χ : Weight R L M) := (χ : L → R) = 0
@[simp] lemma IsZero.eq {χ : Weight R L M} (hχ : χ.IsZero) : (χ : L → R) = 0 := hχ
@[simp] lemma coe_eq_zero_iff (χ : Weight R L M) : (χ : L → R) = 0 ↔ χ.IsZero := Iff.rfl
lemma isZero_iff_eq_zero [Nontrivial (genWeightSpace M (0 : L → R))] {χ : Weight R L M} :
χ.IsZero ↔ χ = 0 := Weight.ext_iff' (χ₂ := 0)
lemma isZero_zero [Nontrivial (genWeightSpace M (0 : L → R))] : IsZero (0 : Weight R L M) := rfl
/-- The proposition that a weight of a Lie module is non-zero. -/
abbrev IsNonZero (χ : Weight R L M) := ¬ IsZero (χ : Weight R L M)
lemma isNonZero_iff_ne_zero [Nontrivial (genWeightSpace M (0 : L → R))] {χ : Weight R L M} :
χ.IsNonZero ↔ χ ≠ 0 := isZero_iff_eq_zero.not
noncomputable instance : DecidablePred (IsNonZero (R := R) (L := L) (M := M)) := Classical.decPred _
variable (R L M) in
/-- The set of weights is equivalent to a subtype. -/
def equivSetOf : Weight R L M ≃ {χ : L → R | genWeightSpace M χ ≠ ⊥} where
toFun w := ⟨w.1, w.2⟩
invFun w := ⟨w.1, w.2⟩
left_inv w := by simp
right_inv w := by simp
lemma genWeightSpaceOf_ne_bot (χ : Weight R L M) (x : L) :
genWeightSpaceOf M (χ x) x ≠ ⊥ := by
have : ⨅ x, genWeightSpaceOf M (χ x) x ≠ ⊥ := χ.genWeightSpace_ne_bot
contrapose! this
rw [eq_bot_iff]
exact le_of_le_of_eq (iInf_le _ _) this
lemma hasEigenvalueAt (χ : Weight R L M) (x : L) :
(toEnd R L M x).HasEigenvalue (χ x) := by
obtain ⟨k : ℕ, hk : (toEnd R L M x).genEigenspace (χ x) k ≠ ⊥⟩ := by
simpa [genWeightSpaceOf, ← Module.End.iSup_genEigenspace_eq] using χ.genWeightSpaceOf_ne_bot x
exact Module.End.hasEigenvalue_of_hasGenEigenvalue hk
lemma apply_eq_zero_of_isNilpotent [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M] [IsReduced R]
(x : L) (h : _root_.IsNilpotent (toEnd R L M x)) (χ : Weight R L M) :
χ x = 0 :=
((χ.hasEigenvalueAt x).isNilpotent_of_isNilpotent h).eq_zero
|
end Weight
/-- See also the more useful form `LieModule.zero_genWeightSpace_eq_top_of_nilpotent`. -/
@[simp]
theorem zero_genWeightSpace_eq_top_of_nilpotent' [IsNilpotent L M] :
genWeightSpace M (0 : L → R) = ⊤ := by
ext
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/Weights/Basic.lean | 296 | 303 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.BoxIntegral.DivergenceTheorem
import Mathlib.Analysis.BoxIntegral.Integrability
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Equiv
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Prod
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.Basic
/-!
# Divergence theorem for Bochner integral
In this file we prove the Divergence theorem for Bochner integral on a box in
`ℝⁿ⁺¹ = Fin (n + 1) → ℝ`. More precisely, we prove the following theorem.
Let `E` be a complete normed space. If `f : ℝⁿ⁺¹ → Eⁿ⁺¹` is
continuous on a rectangular box `[a, b] : Set ℝⁿ⁺¹`, `a ≤ b`, differentiable on its interior with
derivative `f' : ℝⁿ⁺¹ → ℝⁿ⁺¹ →L[ℝ] Eⁿ⁺¹`, and the divergence `fun x ↦ ∑ i, f' x eᵢ i`
is integrable on `[a, b]`, where `eᵢ = Pi.single i 1` is the `i`-th basis vector,
then its integral is equal to the sum of integrals of `f` over the faces of `[a, b]`,
taken with appropriate signs. Moreover, the same
is true if the function is not differentiable at countably many points of the interior of `[a, b]`.
Once we prove the general theorem, we deduce corollaries for functions `ℝ → E` and pairs of
functions `(ℝ × ℝ) → E`.
## Notations
We use the following local notation to make the statement more readable. Note that the documentation
website shows the actual terms, not those abbreviated using local notations.
Porting note (Yury Kudryashov): I disabled some of these notations because I failed to make them
work with Lean 4.
* `ℝⁿ`, `ℝⁿ⁺¹`, `Eⁿ⁺¹`: `Fin n → ℝ`, `Fin (n + 1) → ℝ`, `Fin (n + 1) → E`;
* `face i`: the `i`-th face of the box `[a, b]` as a closed segment in `ℝⁿ`, namely
`[a ∘ Fin.succAbove i, b ∘ Fin.succAbove i]`;
* `e i` : `i`-th basis vector `Pi.single i 1`;
* `frontFace i`, `backFace i`: embeddings `ℝⁿ → ℝⁿ⁺¹` corresponding to the front face
`{x | x i = b i}` and back face `{x | x i = a i}` of the box `[a, b]`, respectively.
They are given by `Fin.insertNth i (b i)` and `Fin.insertNth i (a i)`.
## TODO
* Add a version that assumes existence and integrability of partial derivatives.
* Restore local notations for find another way to make the statements more readable.
## Tags
divergence theorem, Bochner integral
-/
open Set Finset TopologicalSpace Function BoxIntegral MeasureTheory Filter
open scoped Topology Interval
universe u
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {E : Type u} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
section
variable {n : ℕ}
local macro:arg t:term:max noWs "ⁿ" : term => `(Fin n → $t)
local macro:arg t:term:max noWs "ⁿ⁺¹" : term => `(Fin (n + 1) → $t)
local notation "e " i => Pi.single i 1
section
/-!
### Divergence theorem for functions on `ℝⁿ⁺¹ = Fin (n + 1) → ℝ`.
In this section we use the divergence theorem for a Henstock-Kurzweil-like integral
`BoxIntegral.hasIntegral_GP_divergence_of_forall_hasDerivWithinAt` to prove the divergence
theorem for Bochner integral. The divergence theorem for Bochner integral
`MeasureTheory.integral_divergence_of_hasFDerivWithinAt_off_countable` assumes that the function
itself is continuous on a closed box, differentiable at all but countably many points of its
interior, and the divergence is integrable on the box.
This statement differs from `BoxIntegral.hasIntegral_GP_divergence_of_forall_hasDerivWithinAt`
in several aspects.
* We use Bochner integral instead of a Henstock-Kurzweil integral. This modification is done in
`MeasureTheory.integral_divergence_of_hasFDerivWithinAt_off_countable_aux₁`. As a side effect
of this change, we need to assume that the divergence is integrable.
* We don't assume differentiability on the boundary of the box. This modification is done in
`MeasureTheory.integral_divergence_of_hasFDerivWithinAt_off_countable_aux₂`. To prove it, we
choose an increasing sequence of smaller boxes that cover the interior of the original box, then
apply the previous lemma to these smaller boxes and take the limit of both sides of the equation.
* We assume `a ≤ b` instead of `∀ i, a i < b i`. This is the last step of the proof, and it is done
in the main theorem `MeasureTheory.integral_divergence_of_hasFDerivWithinAt_off_countable`.
-/
/-- An auxiliary lemma for
`MeasureTheory.integral_divergence_of_hasFDerivWithinAt_off_countable`. This is exactly
`BoxIntegral.hasIntegral_GP_divergence_of_forall_hasDerivWithinAt` reformulated for the
Bochner integral. -/
theorem integral_divergence_of_hasFDerivWithinAt_off_countable_aux₁ (I : Box (Fin (n + 1)))
(f : ℝⁿ⁺¹ → Eⁿ⁺¹)
| (f' : ℝⁿ⁺¹ → ℝⁿ⁺¹ →L[ℝ] Eⁿ⁺¹) (s : Set ℝⁿ⁺¹)
(hs : s.Countable) (Hc : ContinuousOn f (Box.Icc I))
(Hd : ∀ x ∈ (Box.Icc I) \ s, HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Box.Icc I) x)
(Hi : IntegrableOn (fun x => ∑ i, f' x (e i) i) (Box.Icc I)) :
(∫ x in Box.Icc I, ∑ i, f' x (e i) i) =
∑ i : Fin (n + 1),
((∫ x in Box.Icc (I.face i), f (i.insertNth (I.upper i) x) i) -
∫ x in Box.Icc (I.face i), f (i.insertNth (I.lower i) x) i) := by
wlog hE : CompleteSpace E generalizing
· simp [integral, hE]
simp only [← setIntegral_congr_set (Box.coe_ae_eq_Icc _)]
have A := (Hi.mono_set Box.coe_subset_Icc).hasBoxIntegral ⊥ rfl
have B :=
hasIntegral_GP_divergence_of_forall_hasDerivWithinAt I f f' (s ∩ Box.Icc I)
(hs.mono inter_subset_left) (fun x hx => Hc _ hx.2) fun x hx =>
Hd _ ⟨hx.1, fun h => hx.2 ⟨h, hx.1⟩⟩
rw [continuousOn_pi] at Hc
refine (A.unique B).trans (sum_congr rfl fun i _ => ?_)
refine congr_arg₂ Sub.sub ?_ ?_
· have := Box.continuousOn_face_Icc (Hc i) (Set.right_mem_Icc.2 (I.lower_le_upper i))
have := (this.integrableOn_compact (μ := volume) (Box.isCompact_Icc _)).mono_set
Box.coe_subset_Icc
exact (this.hasBoxIntegral ⊥ rfl).integral_eq
· have := Box.continuousOn_face_Icc (Hc i) (Set.left_mem_Icc.2 (I.lower_le_upper i))
have := (this.integrableOn_compact (μ := volume) (Box.isCompact_Icc _)).mono_set
Box.coe_subset_Icc
exact (this.hasBoxIntegral ⊥ rfl).integral_eq
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/DivergenceTheorem.lean | 111 | 137 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mitchell Lee
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Indicator
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Monoid.Defs
/-!
# Lemmas on infinite sums and products in topological monoids
This file contains many simple lemmas on `tsum`, `HasSum` etc, which are placed here in order to
keep the basic file of definitions as short as possible.
Results requiring a group (rather than monoid) structure on the target should go in `Group.lean`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Filter Finset Function Topology
variable {α β γ : Type*}
section HasProd
variable [CommMonoid α] [TopologicalSpace α]
variable {f g : β → α} {a b : α}
/-- Constant one function has product `1` -/
@[to_additive "Constant zero function has sum `0`"]
theorem hasProd_one : HasProd (fun _ ↦ 1 : β → α) 1 := by simp [HasProd, tendsto_const_nhds]
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_empty [IsEmpty β] : HasProd f 1 := by
convert @hasProd_one α β _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_one : Multipliable (fun _ ↦ 1 : β → α) :=
hasProd_one.multipliable
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_empty [IsEmpty β] : Multipliable f :=
hasProd_empty.multipliable
/-- See `multipliable_congr_cofinite` for a version allowing the functions to
disagree on a finite set. -/
@[to_additive "See `summable_congr_cofinite` for a version allowing the functions to
disagree on a finite set."]
theorem multipliable_congr (hfg : ∀ b, f b = g b) : Multipliable f ↔ Multipliable g :=
iff_of_eq (congr_arg Multipliable <| funext hfg)
/-- See `Multipliable.congr_cofinite` for a version allowing the functions to
disagree on a finite set. -/
@[to_additive "See `Summable.congr_cofinite` for a version allowing the functions to
disagree on a finite set."]
theorem Multipliable.congr (hf : Multipliable f) (hfg : ∀ b, f b = g b) : Multipliable g :=
(multipliable_congr hfg).mp hf
@[to_additive]
lemma HasProd.congr_fun (hf : HasProd f a) (h : ∀ x : β, g x = f x) : HasProd g a :=
(funext h : g = f) ▸ hf
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.hasProd_of_prod_eq {g : γ → α}
(h_eq : ∀ u : Finset γ, ∃ v : Finset β, ∀ v', v ⊆ v' →
∃ u', u ⊆ u' ∧ ∏ x ∈ u', g x = ∏ b ∈ v', f b)
(hf : HasProd g a) : HasProd f a :=
le_trans (map_atTop_finset_prod_le_of_prod_eq h_eq) hf
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_iff_hasProd {g : γ → α}
(h₁ : ∀ u : Finset γ, ∃ v : Finset β, ∀ v', v ⊆ v' →
∃ u', u ⊆ u' ∧ ∏ x ∈ u', g x = ∏ b ∈ v', f b)
(h₂ : ∀ v : Finset β, ∃ u : Finset γ, ∀ u', u ⊆ u' →
∃ v', v ⊆ v' ∧ ∏ b ∈ v', f b = ∏ x ∈ u', g x) :
HasProd f a ↔ HasProd g a :=
⟨HasProd.hasProd_of_prod_eq h₂, HasProd.hasProd_of_prod_eq h₁⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem Function.Injective.multipliable_iff {g : γ → β} (hg : Injective g)
(hf : ∀ x ∉ Set.range g, f x = 1) : Multipliable (f ∘ g) ↔ Multipliable f :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ hg.hasProd_iff hf
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem hasProd_extend_one {g : β → γ} (hg : Injective g) :
HasProd (extend g f 1) a ↔ HasProd f a := by
rw [← hg.hasProd_iff, extend_comp hg]
exact extend_apply' _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem multipliable_extend_one {g : β → γ} (hg : Injective g) :
Multipliable (extend g f 1) ↔ Multipliable f :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ hasProd_extend_one hg
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator {s : Set β} :
HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) a ↔ HasProd (s.mulIndicator f) a := by
rw [← Set.mulIndicator_range_comp, Subtype.range_coe,
hasProd_subtype_iff_of_mulSupport_subset Set.mulSupport_mulIndicator_subset]
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_subtype_iff_mulIndicator {s : Set β} :
Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) ↔ Multipliable (s.mulIndicator f) :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem hasProd_subtype_mulSupport : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : mulSupport f → α) a ↔ HasProd f a :=
hasProd_subtype_iff_of_mulSupport_subset <| Set.Subset.refl _
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Finset.multipliable (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) :
Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : (↑s : Set β) → α) :=
(s.hasProd f).multipliable
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Set.Finite.multipliable {s : Set β} (hs : s.Finite) (f : β → α) :
Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) := by
have := hs.toFinset.multipliable f
rwa [hs.coe_toFinset] at this
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_of_finite_mulSupport (h : (mulSupport f).Finite) : Multipliable f := by
apply multipliable_of_ne_finset_one (s := h.toFinset); simp
@[to_additive]
lemma Multipliable.of_finite [Finite β] {f : β → α} : Multipliable f :=
multipliable_of_finite_mulSupport <| Set.finite_univ.subset (Set.subset_univ _)
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_single {f : β → α} (b : β) (hf : ∀ (b') (_ : b' ≠ b), f b' = 1) : HasProd f (f b) :=
suffices HasProd f (∏ b' ∈ {b}, f b') by simpa using this
hasProd_prod_of_ne_finset_one <| by simpa [hf]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma hasProd_unique [Unique β] (f : β → α) : HasProd f (f default) :=
hasProd_single default (fun _ hb ↦ False.elim <| hb <| Unique.uniq ..)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma hasProd_singleton (m : β) (f : β → α) : HasProd (({m} : Set β).restrict f) (f m) :=
hasProd_unique (Set.restrict {m} f)
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_ite_eq (b : β) [DecidablePred (· = b)] (a : α) :
HasProd (fun b' ↦ if b' = b then a else 1) a := by
convert @hasProd_single _ _ _ _ (fun b' ↦ if b' = b then a else 1) b (fun b' hb' ↦ if_neg hb')
exact (if_pos rfl).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem Equiv.hasProd_iff (e : γ ≃ β) : HasProd (f ∘ e) a ↔ HasProd f a :=
e.injective.hasProd_iff <| by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem Function.Injective.hasProd_range_iff {g : γ → β} (hg : Injective g) :
HasProd (fun x : Set.range g ↦ f x) a ↔ HasProd (f ∘ g) a :=
(Equiv.ofInjective g hg).hasProd_iff.symm
@[to_additive]
theorem Equiv.multipliable_iff (e : γ ≃ β) : Multipliable (f ∘ e) ↔ Multipliable f :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ e.hasProd_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem Equiv.hasProd_iff_of_mulSupport {g : γ → α} (e : mulSupport f ≃ mulSupport g)
(he : ∀ x : mulSupport f, g (e x) = f x) : HasProd f a ↔ HasProd g a := by
have : (g ∘ (↑)) ∘ e = f ∘ (↑) := funext he
rw [← hasProd_subtype_mulSupport, ← this, e.hasProd_iff, hasProd_subtype_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_iff_hasProd_of_ne_one_bij {g : γ → α} (i : mulSupport g → β)
(hi : Injective i) (hf : mulSupport f ⊆ Set.range i)
(hfg : ∀ x, f (i x) = g x) : HasProd f a ↔ HasProd g a :=
Iff.symm <|
Equiv.hasProd_iff_of_mulSupport
(Equiv.ofBijective (fun x ↦ ⟨i x, fun hx ↦ x.coe_prop <| hfg x ▸ hx⟩)
⟨fun _ _ h ↦ hi <| Subtype.ext_iff.1 h, fun y ↦
(hf y.coe_prop).imp fun _ hx ↦ Subtype.ext hx⟩)
| hfg
@[to_additive]
theorem Equiv.multipliable_iff_of_mulSupport {g : γ → α} (e : mulSupport f ≃ mulSupport g)
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/InfiniteSum/Basic.lean | 176 | 179 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 David Kurniadi Angdinata. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Kurniadi Angdinata
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.EvenOddRec
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.Tactic.LinearCombination
/-!
# Elliptic divisibility sequences
This file defines the type of an elliptic divisibility sequence (EDS) and a few examples.
## Mathematical background
Let `R` be a commutative ring. An elliptic sequence is a sequence `W : ℤ → R` satisfying
`W(m + n)W(m - n)W(r)² = W(m + r)W(m - r)W(n)² - W(n + r)W(n - r)W(m)²` for any `m, n, r ∈ ℤ`.
A divisibility sequence is a sequence `W : ℤ → R` satisfying `W(m) ∣ W(n)` for any `m, n ∈ ℤ` such
that `m ∣ n`. An elliptic divisibility sequence is simply a divisibility sequence that is elliptic.
Some examples of EDSs include
* the identity sequence,
* certain terms of Lucas sequences, and
* division polynomials of elliptic curves.
## Main definitions
* `IsEllSequence`: a sequence indexed by integers is an elliptic sequence.
* `IsDivSequence`: a sequence indexed by integers is a divisibility sequence.
* `IsEllDivSequence`: a sequence indexed by integers is an EDS.
* `preNormEDS'`: the auxiliary sequence for a normalised EDS indexed by `ℕ`.
* `preNormEDS`: the auxiliary sequence for a normalised EDS indexed by `ℤ`.
* `normEDS`: the canonical example of a normalised EDS indexed by `ℤ`.
## Main statements
* TODO: prove that `normEDS` satisfies `IsEllDivSequence`.
* TODO: prove that a normalised sequence satisfying `IsEllDivSequence` can be given by `normEDS`.
## Implementation notes
The normalised EDS `normEDS b c d n` is defined in terms of the auxiliary sequence
`preNormEDS (b ^ 4) c d n`, which are equal when `n` is odd, and which differ by a factor of `b`
when `n` is even. This coincides with the definition in the references since both agree for
`normEDS b c d 2` and for `normEDS b c d 4`, and the correct factors of `b` are removed in
`normEDS b c d (2 * (m + 2) + 1)` and in `normEDS b c d (2 * (m + 3))`.
One reason is to avoid the necessity for ring division by `b` in the inductive definition of
`normEDS b c d (2 * (m + 3))`. The idea is that, it can be shown that `normEDS b c d (2 * (m + 3))`
always contains a factor of `b`, so it is possible to remove a factor of `b` *a posteriori*, but
stating this lemma requires first defining `normEDS b c d (2 * (m + 3))`, which requires having this
factor of `b` *a priori*. Another reason is to allow the definition of univariate `n`-division
polynomials of elliptic curves, omitting a factor of the bivariate `2`-division polynomial.
## References
M Ward, *Memoir on Elliptic Divisibility Sequences*
## Tags
elliptic, divisibility, sequence
-/
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} [CommRing R]
section IsEllDivSequence
variable (W : ℤ → R)
/-- The proposition that a sequence indexed by integers is an elliptic sequence. -/
def IsEllSequence : Prop :=
∀ m n r : ℤ, W (m + n) * W (m - n) * W r ^ 2 =
W (m + r) * W (m - r) * W n ^ 2 - W (n + r) * W (n - r) * W m ^ 2
/-- The proposition that a sequence indexed by integers is a divisibility sequence. -/
def IsDivSequence : Prop :=
∀ m n : ℕ, m ∣ n → W m ∣ W n
/-- The proposition that a sequence indexed by integers is an EDS. -/
def IsEllDivSequence : Prop :=
IsEllSequence W ∧ IsDivSequence W
lemma isEllSequence_id : IsEllSequence id :=
fun _ _ _ => by simp only [id_eq]; ring1
lemma isDivSequence_id : IsDivSequence id :=
fun _ _ => Int.ofNat_dvd.mpr
/-- The identity sequence is an EDS. -/
theorem isEllDivSequence_id : IsEllDivSequence id :=
⟨isEllSequence_id, isDivSequence_id⟩
variable {W}
lemma IsEllSequence.smul (h : IsEllSequence W) (x : R) : IsEllSequence (x • W) :=
fun m n r => by
linear_combination (norm := (simp only [Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul]; ring1)) x ^ 4 * h m n r
lemma IsDivSequence.smul (h : IsDivSequence W) (x : R) : IsDivSequence (x • W) :=
fun m n r => mul_dvd_mul_left x <| h m n r
lemma IsEllDivSequence.smul (h : IsEllDivSequence W) (x : R) : IsEllDivSequence (x • W) :=
⟨h.left.smul x, h.right.smul x⟩
end IsEllDivSequence
/-- Strong recursion principle for a normalised EDS: if we have
* `P 0`, `P 1`, `P 2`, `P 3`, and `P 4`,
* for all `m : ℕ` we can prove `P (2 * (m + 3))` from `P k` for all `k < 2 * (m + 3)`, and
* for all `m : ℕ` we can prove `P (2 * (m + 2) + 1)` from `P k` for all `k < 2 * (m + 2) + 1`,
then we have `P n` for all `n : ℕ`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
noncomputable def normEDSRec' {P : ℕ → Sort u}
(zero : P 0) (one : P 1) (two : P 2) (three : P 3) (four : P 4)
(even : ∀ m : ℕ, (∀ k < 2 * (m + 3), P k) → P (2 * (m + 3)))
(odd : ∀ m : ℕ, (∀ k < 2 * (m + 2) + 1, P k) → P (2 * (m + 2) + 1)) (n : ℕ) : P n :=
n.evenOddStrongRec (by rintro (_ | _ | _ | _) h; exacts [zero, two, four, even _ h])
(by rintro (_ | _ | _) h; exacts [one, three, odd _ h])
/-- Recursion principle for a normalised EDS: if we have
* `P 0`, `P 1`, `P 2`, `P 3`, and `P 4`,
* for all `m : ℕ` we can prove `P (2 * (m + 3))` from `P (m + 1)`, `P (m + 2)`, `P (m + 3)`,
`P (m + 4)`, and `P (m + 5)`, and
* for all `m : ℕ` we can prove `P (2 * (m + 2) + 1)` from `P (m + 1)`, `P (m + 2)`, `P (m + 3)`,
and `P (m + 4)`,
then we have `P n` for all `n : ℕ`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
noncomputable def normEDSRec {P : ℕ → Sort u}
(zero : P 0) (one : P 1) (two : P 2) (three : P 3) (four : P 4)
(even : ∀ m : ℕ, P (m + 1) → P (m + 2) → P (m + 3) → P (m + 4) → P (m + 5) → P (2 * (m + 3)))
(odd : ∀ m : ℕ, P (m + 1) → P (m + 2) → P (m + 3) → P (m + 4) → P (2 * (m + 2) + 1)) (n : ℕ) :
P n :=
normEDSRec' zero one two three four
(fun _ ih => by apply even <;> exact ih _ <| by linarith only)
(fun _ ih => by apply odd <;> exact ih _ <| by linarith only) n
variable (b c d : R)
section PreNormEDS
/-- The auxiliary sequence for a normalised EDS `W : ℕ → R`, with initial values
`W(0) = 0`, `W(1) = 1`, `W(2) = 1`, `W(3) = c`, and `W(4) = d` and extra parameter `b`. -/
def preNormEDS' (b c d : R) : ℕ → R
| 0 => 0
| 1 => 1
| | 2 => 1
| 3 => c
| 4 => d
| (n + 5) => let m := n / 2
have h4 : m + 4 < n + 5 := Nat.lt_succ.mpr <| add_le_add_right (n.div_le_self 2) 4
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/EllipticDivisibilitySequence.lean | 149 | 153 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Finite
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.BinaryProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Products
/-!
# Constructing finite products from binary products and terminal.
If a category has binary products and a terminal object then it has finite products.
If a functor preserves binary products and the terminal object then it preserves finite products.
## TODO
Provide the dual results.
Show the analogous results for functors which reflect or create (co)limits.
-/
universe v v' u u'
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace CategoryTheory
variable {J : Type v} [SmallCategory J]
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable {D : Type u'} [Category.{v'} D]
/--
Given `n+1` objects of `C`, a fan for the last `n` with point `c₁.pt` and
a binary fan on `c₁.pt` and `f 0`, we can build a fan for all `n+1`.
In `extendFanIsLimit` we show that if the two given fans are limits, then this fan is also a
limit.
-/
@[simps!]
def extendFan {n : ℕ} {f : Fin (n + 1) → C} (c₁ : Fan fun i : Fin n => f i.succ)
(c₂ : BinaryFan (f 0) c₁.pt) : Fan f :=
Fan.mk c₂.pt
(by
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_
· apply c₂.fst
· intro i
apply c₂.snd ≫ c₁.π.app ⟨i⟩)
/-- Show that if the two given fans in `extendFan` are limits, then the constructed fan is also a
limit.
-/
def extendFanIsLimit {n : ℕ} (f : Fin (n + 1) → C) {c₁ : Fan fun i : Fin n => f i.succ}
{c₂ : BinaryFan (f 0) c₁.pt} (t₁ : IsLimit c₁) (t₂ : IsLimit c₂) :
IsLimit (extendFan c₁ c₂) where
lift s := by
apply (BinaryFan.IsLimit.lift' t₂ (s.π.app ⟨0⟩) _).1
apply t₁.lift ⟨_, Discrete.natTrans fun ⟨i⟩ => s.π.app ⟨i.succ⟩⟩
fac := fun s ⟨j⟩ => by
refine Fin.inductionOn j ?_ ?_
· apply (BinaryFan.IsLimit.lift' t₂ _ _).2.1
· rintro i -
dsimp only [extendFan_π_app]
rw [Fin.cases_succ, ← assoc, (BinaryFan.IsLimit.lift' t₂ _ _).2.2, t₁.fac]
rfl
uniq s m w := by
apply BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext t₂
· rw [(BinaryFan.IsLimit.lift' t₂ _ _).2.1]
apply w ⟨0⟩
· rw [(BinaryFan.IsLimit.lift' t₂ _ _).2.2]
apply t₁.uniq ⟨_, _⟩
rintro ⟨j⟩
rw [assoc]
dsimp only [Discrete.natTrans_app]
rw [← w ⟨j.succ⟩]
dsimp only [extendFan_π_app]
rw [Fin.cases_succ]
section
variable [HasBinaryProducts C] [HasTerminal C]
/-- If `C` has a terminal object and binary products, then it has a product for objects indexed by
`Fin n`.
This is a helper lemma for `hasFiniteProductsOfHasBinaryAndTerminal`, which is more general
than this.
-/
private theorem hasProduct_fin : ∀ (n : ℕ) (f : Fin n → C), HasProduct f
| 0 => fun _ =>
letI : HasLimitsOfShape (Discrete (Fin 0)) C :=
hasLimitsOfShape_of_equivalence (Discrete.equivalence.{0} finZeroEquiv'.symm)
inferInstance
| n + 1 => fun f =>
haveI := hasProduct_fin n
HasLimit.mk ⟨_, extendFanIsLimit f (limit.isLimit _) (limit.isLimit _)⟩
/-- If `C` has a terminal object and binary products, then it has finite products. -/
theorem hasFiniteProducts_of_has_binary_and_terminal : HasFiniteProducts C :=
⟨fun n => ⟨fun K => by
let that : (Discrete.functor fun n => K.obj ⟨n⟩) ≅ K := Discrete.natIso fun ⟨_⟩ => Iso.refl _
rw [← hasLimit_iff_of_iso that]
apply hasProduct_fin⟩⟩
|
end
section Preserves
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Constructions/FiniteProductsOfBinaryProducts.lean | 106 | 110 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Torsion
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Perfect
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AnnihilatingPolynomial
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Artinian.Instances
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Nilpotent
import Mathlib.RingTheory.SimpleModule.Basic
/-!
# Semisimple linear endomorphisms
Given an `R`-module `M` together with an `R`-linear endomorphism `f : M → M`, the following two
conditions are equivalent:
1. Every `f`-invariant submodule of `M` has an `f`-invariant complement.
2. `M` is a semisimple `R[X]`-module, where the action of the polynomial ring is induced by `f`.
A linear endomorphism `f` satisfying these equivalent conditions is known as a *semisimple*
endomorphism. We provide basic definitions and results about such endomorphisms in this file.
## Main definitions / results:
* `Module.End.IsSemisimple`: the definition that a linear endomorphism is semisimple
* `Module.End.isSemisimple_iff`: the characterisation of semisimplicity in terms of invariant
submodules.
* `Module.End.eq_zero_of_isNilpotent_isSemisimple`: the zero endomorphism is the only endomorphism
that is both nilpotent and semisimple.
* `Module.End.isSemisimple_of_squarefree_aeval_eq_zero`: an endomorphism that is a root of a
square-free polynomial is semisimple (in finite dimensions over a field).
* `Module.End.IsSemisimple.minpoly_squarefree`: the minimal polynomial of a semisimple
endomorphism is squarefree.
* `IsSemisimple.of_mem_adjoin_pair`: every endomorphism in the subalgebra generated by two
commuting semisimple endomorphisms is semisimple, if the base field is perfect.
## TODO
In finite dimensions over a field:
* Triangularizable iff diagonalisable for semisimple endomorphisms
-/
open Set Function Polynomial
variable {R M : Type*} [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
namespace Module.End
section CommRing
variable (f : End R M)
/-- A linear endomorphism of an `R`-module `M` is called *semisimple* if the induced `R[X]`-module
structure on `M` is semisimple. This is equivalent to saying that every `f`-invariant `R`-submodule
of `M` has an `f`-invariant complement: see `Module.End.isSemisimple_iff`. -/
def IsSemisimple := IsSemisimpleModule R[X] (AEval' f)
/-- A weaker version of semisimplicity that only prescribes behaviour on finitely-generated
submodules. -/
def IsFinitelySemisimple : Prop :=
∀ p (hp : p ∈ invtSubmodule f), Module.Finite R p → IsSemisimple (LinearMap.restrict f hp)
variable {f}
/-- A linear endomorphism is semisimple if every invariant submodule has in invariant complement.
See also `Module.End.isSemisimple_iff`. -/
lemma isSemisimple_iff' :
f.IsSemisimple ↔ ∀ p : invtSubmodule f, ∃ q : invtSubmodule f, IsCompl p q := by
rw [IsSemisimple, IsSemisimpleModule, (AEval.mapSubmodule R M f).symm.complementedLattice_iff,
complementedLattice_iff]
rfl
lemma isSemisimple_iff :
f.IsSemisimple ↔ ∀ p ∈ invtSubmodule f, ∃ q ∈ invtSubmodule f, IsCompl p q := by
simp [isSemisimple_iff']
lemma isSemisimple_restrict_iff (p) (hp : p ∈ invtSubmodule f) :
IsSemisimple (LinearMap.restrict f hp) ↔
∀ q ∈ f.invtSubmodule, q ≤ p → ∃ r ≤ p, r ∈ f.invtSubmodule ∧ Disjoint q r ∧ q ⊔ r = p := by
let e : Submodule R[X] (AEval' (f.restrict hp)) ≃o Iic (AEval.mapSubmodule R M f ⟨p, hp⟩) :=
(Submodule.orderIsoMapComap <| AEval.restrict_equiv_mapSubmodule f p hp).trans
(Submodule.mapIic _)
simp_rw [IsSemisimple, IsSemisimpleModule, e.complementedLattice_iff, disjoint_iff,
← (OrderIso.Iic _ _).complementedLattice_iff, Iic.complementedLattice_iff, Subtype.forall,
Subtype.exists, Subtype.mk_le_mk, Sublattice.mk_inf_mk, Sublattice.mk_sup_mk, Subtype.mk.injEq,
exists_and_left, exists_and_right, invtSubmodule.mk_eq_bot_iff, exists_prop, and_assoc]
rfl
/-- A linear endomorphism is finitely semisimple if it is semisimple on every finitely-generated
invariant submodule.
See also `Module.End.isFinitelySemisimple_iff`. -/
lemma isFinitelySemisimple_iff' :
f.IsFinitelySemisimple ↔ ∀ p (hp : p ∈ invtSubmodule f),
Module.Finite R p → IsSemisimple (LinearMap.restrict f hp) :=
Iff.rfl
/-- A characterisation of `Module.End.IsFinitelySemisimple` using only the lattice of submodules of
`M` (thus avoiding submodules of submodules). -/
lemma isFinitelySemisimple_iff :
f.IsFinitelySemisimple ↔ ∀ p ∈ invtSubmodule f, Module.Finite R p → ∀ q ∈ invtSubmodule f,
q ≤ p → ∃ r, r ≤ p ∧ r ∈ invtSubmodule f ∧ Disjoint q r ∧ q ⊔ r = p := by
simp_rw [isFinitelySemisimple_iff', isSemisimple_restrict_iff]
@[simp]
lemma isSemisimple_zero [IsSemisimpleModule R M] : IsSemisimple (0 : Module.End R M) := by
simpa [isSemisimple_iff] using exists_isCompl
@[simp]
lemma isSemisimple_id [IsSemisimpleModule R M] : IsSemisimple (LinearMap.id : Module.End R M) := by
simpa [isSemisimple_iff] using exists_isCompl
@[simp] lemma isSemisimple_neg : (-f).IsSemisimple ↔ f.IsSemisimple := by
simp [isSemisimple_iff, mem_invtSubmodule]
variable (f) in
protected lemma _root_.LinearEquiv.isSemisimple_iff {M₂ : Type*} [AddCommGroup M₂] [Module R M₂]
(g : End R M₂) (e : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) (he : e ∘ₗ f = g ∘ₗ e) :
f.IsSemisimple ↔ g.IsSemisimple := by
let e : AEval' f ≃ₗ[R[X]] AEval' g := LinearEquiv.ofAEval _ (e.trans (AEval'.of g)) fun x ↦ by
simpa [AEval'.X_smul_of] using LinearMap.congr_fun he x
exact (Submodule.orderIsoMapComap e).complementedLattice_iff
lemma eq_zero_of_isNilpotent_isSemisimple (hn : IsNilpotent f) (hs : f.IsSemisimple) : f = 0 := by
have ⟨n, h0⟩ := hn
rw [← aeval_X (R := R) f]; rw [← aeval_X_pow (R := R) f] at h0
rw [← RingHom.mem_ker, ← AEval.annihilator_eq_ker_aeval (M := M)] at h0 ⊢
exact hs.annihilator_isRadical _ _ ⟨n, h0⟩
lemma eq_zero_of_isNilpotent_of_isFinitelySemisimple
(hn : IsNilpotent f) (hs : IsFinitelySemisimple f) : f = 0 := by
have (p) (hp₁ : p ∈ f.invtSubmodule) (hp₂ : Module.Finite R p) : f.restrict hp₁ = 0 := by
specialize hs p hp₁ hp₂
replace hn : IsNilpotent (f.restrict hp₁) := isNilpotent.restrict hp₁ hn
exact eq_zero_of_isNilpotent_isSemisimple hn hs
ext x
obtain ⟨k : ℕ, hk : f ^ k = 0⟩ := hn
let p := Submodule.span R {(f ^ i) x | (i : ℕ) (_ : i ≤ k)}
have hp₁ : p ∈ f.invtSubmodule := by
simp only [mem_invtSubmodule, p, Submodule.span_le]
rintro - ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩
apply Submodule.subset_span
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hi with hik | rfl
| · exact ⟨i + 1, hik, by simpa [Module.End.pow_apply] using iterate_succ_apply' f i x⟩
· exact ⟨i, by simp [hk]⟩
have hp₂ : Module.Finite R p := by
let g : ℕ → M := fun i ↦ (f ^ i) x
have hg : {(f ^ i) x | (i : ℕ) (_ : i ≤ k)} = g '' Iic k := by ext; simp [g]
exact Module.Finite.span_of_finite _ <| hg ▸ toFinite (g '' Iic k)
simpa [LinearMap.restrict_apply, Subtype.ext_iff] using
LinearMap.congr_fun (this p hp₁ hp₂) ⟨x, Submodule.subset_span ⟨0, k.zero_le, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
lemma isSemisimple_sub_algebraMap_iff {μ : R} :
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Semisimple.lean | 145 | 155 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Simon Hudon, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EqToHom
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.NatIso
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Products.Basic
/-!
# Categories of indexed families of objects.
We define the pointwise category structure on indexed families of objects in a category
(and also the dependent generalization).
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
universe w₀ w₁ w₂ v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
variable {I : Type w₀} {J : Type w₁} (C : I → Type u₁) [∀ i, Category.{v₁} (C i)]
/-- `pi C` gives the cartesian product of an indexed family of categories.
-/
instance pi : Category.{max w₀ v₁} (∀ i, C i) where
Hom X Y := ∀ i, X i ⟶ Y i
id X i := 𝟙 (X i)
comp f g i := f i ≫ g i
namespace Pi
@[simp]
theorem id_apply (X : ∀ i, C i) (i) : (𝟙 X : ∀ i, X i ⟶ X i) i = 𝟙 (X i) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply {X Y Z : ∀ i, C i} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (i) :
(f ≫ g : ∀ i, X i ⟶ Z i) i = f i ≫ g i :=
rfl
@[ext]
lemma ext {X Y : ∀ i, C i} {f g : X ⟶ Y} (w : ∀ i, f i = g i) : f = g :=
funext (w ·)
/--
The evaluation functor at `i : I`, sending an `I`-indexed family of objects to the object over `i`.
-/
@[simps]
def eval (i : I) : (∀ i, C i) ⥤ C i where
obj f := f i
map α := α i
section
variable {J : Type w₁}
/- Porting note: add this because Lean cannot see directly through the `∘` for
`Function.comp` -/
instance (f : J → I) : (j : J) → Category ((C ∘ f) j) := by
dsimp
infer_instance
/-- Pull back an `I`-indexed family of objects to a `J`-indexed family, along a function `J → I`.
-/
@[simps]
def comap (h : J → I) : (∀ i, C i) ⥤ (∀ j, C (h j)) where
obj f i := f (h i)
map α i := α (h i)
variable (I)
/-- The natural isomorphism between
pulling back a grading along the identity function,
and the identity functor. -/
@[simps]
def comapId : comap C (id : I → I) ≅ 𝟭 (∀ i, C i) where
hom := { app := fun X => 𝟙 X }
inv := { app := fun X => 𝟙 X }
example (g : J → I) : (j : J) → Category (C (g j)) := by infer_instance
variable {I}
variable {K : Type w₂}
/-- The natural isomorphism comparing between
pulling back along two successive functions, and
pulling back along their composition
-/
@[simps!]
def comapComp (f : K → J) (g : J → I) : comap C g ⋙ comap (C ∘ g) f ≅ comap C (g ∘ f) where
hom :=
{ app := fun X b => 𝟙 (X (g (f b)))
naturality := fun X Y f' => by simp only [comap, Function.comp]; funext; simp }
inv :=
{ app := fun X b => 𝟙 (X (g (f b)))
naturality := fun X Y f' => by simp only [comap, Function.comp]; funext; simp }
/-- The natural isomorphism between pulling back then evaluating, and just evaluating. -/
@[simps!]
def comapEvalIsoEval (h : J → I) (j : J) : comap C h ⋙ eval (C ∘ h) j ≅ eval C (h j) :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun _ => Iso.refl _) (by simp only [Iso.refl]; simp)
end
section
variable {J : Type w₀} {D : J → Type u₁} [∀ j, Category.{v₁} (D j)]
/- Porting note: maybe mixing up universes -/
instance sumElimCategory : ∀ s : I ⊕ J, Category.{v₁} (Sum.elim C D s)
| Sum.inl i => by
dsimp
infer_instance
| Sum.inr j => by
dsimp
infer_instance
/- Porting note: replaced `Sum.rec` with `match`'s per the error about
current state of code generation -/
/-- The bifunctor combining an `I`-indexed family of objects with a `J`-indexed family of objects
to obtain an `I ⊕ J`-indexed family of objects.
-/
@[simps]
def sum : (∀ i, C i) ⥤ (∀ j, D j) ⥤ ∀ s : I ⊕ J, Sum.elim C D s where
obj X :=
{ obj := fun Y s =>
match s with
| .inl i => X i
| .inr j => Y j
map := fun {_} {_} f s =>
match s with
| .inl i => 𝟙 (X i)
| .inr j => f j }
map {X} {X'} f :=
{ app := fun Y s =>
match s with
| .inl i => f i
| .inr j => 𝟙 (Y j) }
end
variable {C}
/-- An isomorphism between `I`-indexed objects gives an isomorphism between each
pair of corresponding components. -/
@[simps]
def isoApp {X Y : ∀ i, C i} (f : X ≅ Y) (i : I) : X i ≅ Y i :=
⟨f.hom i, f.inv i,
by rw [← comp_apply, Iso.hom_inv_id, id_apply], by rw [← comp_apply, Iso.inv_hom_id, id_apply]⟩
@[simp]
theorem isoApp_refl (X : ∀ i, C i) (i : I) : isoApp (Iso.refl X) i = Iso.refl (X i) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem isoApp_symm {X Y : ∀ i, C i} (f : X ≅ Y) (i : I) : isoApp f.symm i = (isoApp f i).symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem isoApp_trans {X Y Z : ∀ i, C i} (f : X ≅ Y) (g : Y ≅ Z) (i : I) :
isoApp (f ≪≫ g) i = isoApp f i ≪≫ isoApp g i :=
rfl
end Pi
namespace Functor
variable {C}
variable {D : I → Type u₂} [∀ i, Category.{v₂} (D i)] {A : Type u₃} [Category.{v₃} A]
/-- Assemble an `I`-indexed family of functors into a functor between the pi types.
-/
@[simps]
def pi (F : ∀ i, C i ⥤ D i) : (∀ i, C i) ⥤ ∀ i, D i where
obj f i := (F i).obj (f i)
map α i := (F i).map (α i)
/-- Similar to `pi`, but all functors come from the same category `A`
-/
@[simps]
def pi' (f : ∀ i, A ⥤ C i) : A ⥤ ∀ i, C i where
obj a i := (f i).obj a
map h i := (f i).map h
/-- The projections of `Functor.pi' F` are isomorphic to the functors of the family `F` -/
@[simps!]
def pi'CompEval {A : Type*} [Category A] (F : ∀ i, A ⥤ C i) (i : I) :
pi' F ⋙ Pi.eval C i ≅ F i :=
Iso.refl _
section EqToHom
@[simp]
theorem eqToHom_proj {x x' : ∀ i, C i} (h : x = x') (i : I) :
(eqToHom h : x ⟶ x') i = eqToHom (funext_iff.mp h i) := by
subst h
rfl
end EqToHom
-- One could add some natural isomorphisms showing
-- how `Functor.pi` commutes with `Pi.eval` and `Pi.comap`.
@[simp]
theorem pi'_eval (f : ∀ i, A ⥤ C i) (i : I) : pi' f ⋙ Pi.eval C i = f i := by
apply Functor.ext
· intro _ _ _
simp
· intro _
rfl
/-- Two functors to a product category are equal iff they agree on every coordinate. -/
theorem pi_ext (f f' : A ⥤ ∀ i, C i) (h : ∀ i, f ⋙ (Pi.eval C i) = f' ⋙ (Pi.eval C i)) :
f = f' := by
apply Functor.ext; rotate_left
· intro X
ext i
specialize h i
have := congr_obj h X
simpa
· intro X Y g
dsimp
funext i
specialize h i
have := congr_hom h g
simpa
end Functor
namespace NatTrans
variable {C}
variable {D : I → Type u₂} [∀ i, Category.{v₂} (D i)]
variable {F G : ∀ i, C i ⥤ D i}
/-- Assemble an `I`-indexed family of natural transformations into a single natural transformation.
-/
@[simps!]
def pi (α : ∀ i, F i ⟶ G i) : Functor.pi F ⟶ Functor.pi G where
app f i := (α i).app (f i)
/-- Assemble an `I`-indexed family of natural transformations into a single natural transformation.
-/
@[simps]
def pi' {E : Type*} [Category E] {F G : E ⥤ ∀ i, C i}
(τ : ∀ i, F ⋙ Pi.eval C i ⟶ G ⋙ Pi.eval C i) : F ⟶ G where
app := fun X i => (τ i).app X
naturality _ _ f := by
ext i
exact (τ i).naturality f
end NatTrans
namespace NatIso
variable {C}
variable {D : I → Type u₂} [∀ i, Category.{v₂} (D i)]
variable {F G : ∀ i, C i ⥤ D i}
/-- Assemble an `I`-indexed family of natural isomorphisms into a single natural isomorphism.
-/
@[simps]
def pi (e : ∀ i, F i ≅ G i) : Functor.pi F ≅ Functor.pi G where
hom := NatTrans.pi (fun i => (e i).hom)
inv := NatTrans.pi (fun i => (e i).inv)
/-- Assemble an `I`-indexed family of natural isomorphisms into a single natural isomorphism.
-/
@[simps]
def pi' {E : Type*} [Category E] {F G : E ⥤ ∀ i, C i}
(e : ∀ i, F ⋙ Pi.eval C i ≅ G ⋙ Pi.eval C i) : F ≅ G where
hom := NatTrans.pi' (fun i => (e i).hom)
inv := NatTrans.pi' (fun i => (e i).inv)
end NatIso
variable {C}
lemma isIso_pi_iff {X Y : ∀ i, C i} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
IsIso f ↔ ∀ i, IsIso (f i) := by
constructor
· intro _ i
exact (Pi.isoApp (asIso f) i).isIso_hom
· intro
exact ⟨fun i => inv (f i), by aesop_cat, by aesop_cat⟩
variable (C)
/-- For a family of categories `C i` indexed by `I`, an equality `i = j` in `I` induces
an equivalence `C i ≌ C j`. -/
def Pi.eqToEquivalence {i j : I} (h : i = j) : C i ≌ C j := by subst h; rfl
/-- When `i = j`, projections `Pi.eval C i` and `Pi.eval C j` are related by the equivalence
`Pi.eqToEquivalence C h : C i ≌ C j`. -/
@[simps!]
def Pi.evalCompEqToEquivalenceFunctor {i j : I} (h : i = j) :
Pi.eval C i ⋙ (Pi.eqToEquivalence C h).functor ≅
Pi.eval C j :=
eqToIso (by subst h; rfl)
/-- The equivalences given by `Pi.eqToEquivalence` are compatible with reindexing. -/
@[simps!]
def Pi.eqToEquivalenceFunctorIso (f : J → I) {i' j' : J} (h : i' = j') :
(Pi.eqToEquivalence C (congr_arg f h)).functor ≅
(Pi.eqToEquivalence (fun i' => C (f i')) h).functor :=
eqToIso (by subst h; rfl)
attribute [local simp] eqToHom_map
/-- Reindexing a family of categories gives equivalent `Pi` categories. -/
| @[simps]
noncomputable def Pi.equivalenceOfEquiv (e : J ≃ I) :
(∀ j, C (e j)) ≌ (∀ i, C i) where
functor := Functor.pi' (fun i => Pi.eval _ (e.symm i) ⋙
(Pi.eqToEquivalence C (by simp)).functor)
inverse := Functor.pi' (fun i' => Pi.eval _ (e i'))
unitIso := NatIso.pi' (fun i' => Functor.leftUnitor _ ≪≫
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Pi/Basic.lean | 314 | 320 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Patrick Stevens
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Intervals
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.NatAntidiagonal
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
/-!
# Sums of binomial coefficients
This file includes variants of the binomial theorem and other results on sums of binomial
coefficients. Theorems whose proofs depend on such sums may also go in this file for import
reasons.
-/
open Nat Finset
variable {R : Type*}
namespace Commute
variable [Semiring R] {x y : R}
/-- A version of the **binomial theorem** for commuting elements in noncommutative semirings. -/
theorem add_pow (h : Commute x y) (n : ℕ) :
(x + y) ^ n = ∑ m ∈ range (n + 1), x ^ m * y ^ (n - m) * n.choose m := by
let t : ℕ → ℕ → R := fun n m ↦ x ^ m * y ^ (n - m) * n.choose m
change (x + y) ^ n = ∑ m ∈ range (n + 1), t n m
have h_first : ∀ n, t n 0 = y ^ n := fun n ↦ by
simp only [t, choose_zero_right, pow_zero, cast_one, mul_one, one_mul, tsub_zero]
have h_last : ∀ n, t n n.succ = 0 := fun n ↦ by
simp only [t, choose_succ_self, cast_zero, mul_zero]
have h_middle :
∀ n i : ℕ, i ∈ range n.succ → (t n.succ i.succ) = x * t n i + y * t n i.succ := by
intro n i h_mem
have h_le : i ≤ n := le_of_lt_succ (mem_range.mp h_mem)
dsimp only [t]
rw [choose_succ_succ, cast_add, mul_add]
congr 1
· rw [pow_succ' x, succ_sub_succ, mul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_assoc]
· rw [← mul_assoc y, ← mul_assoc y, (h.symm.pow_right i.succ).eq]
by_cases h_eq : i = n
· rw [h_eq, choose_succ_self, cast_zero, mul_zero, mul_zero]
· rw [succ_sub (lt_of_le_of_ne h_le h_eq)]
rw [pow_succ' y, mul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_assoc]
induction n with
| zero =>
rw [pow_zero, sum_range_succ, range_zero, sum_empty, zero_add]
dsimp only [t]
rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, choose_self, cast_one, mul_one, mul_one]
| succ n ih =>
rw [sum_range_succ', h_first, sum_congr rfl (h_middle n), sum_add_distrib, add_assoc,
pow_succ' (x + y), ih, add_mul, mul_sum, mul_sum]
congr 1
rw [sum_range_succ', sum_range_succ, h_first, h_last, mul_zero, add_zero, _root_.pow_succ']
/-- A version of `Commute.add_pow` that avoids ℕ-subtraction by summing over the antidiagonal and
also with the binomial coefficient applied via scalar action of ℕ. -/
theorem add_pow' (h : Commute x y) (n : ℕ) :
(x + y) ^ n = ∑ m ∈ antidiagonal n, n.choose m.1 • (x ^ m.1 * y ^ m.2) := by
simp_rw [Nat.sum_antidiagonal_eq_sum_range_succ fun m p ↦ n.choose m • (x ^ m * y ^ p),
nsmul_eq_mul, cast_comm, h.add_pow]
end Commute
/-- The **binomial theorem** -/
theorem add_pow [CommSemiring R] (x y : R) (n : ℕ) :
(x + y) ^ n = ∑ m ∈ range (n + 1), x ^ m * y ^ (n - m) * n.choose m :=
(Commute.all x y).add_pow n
/-- A special case of the **binomial theorem** -/
theorem sub_pow [CommRing R] (x y : R) (n : ℕ) :
(x - y) ^ n = ∑ m ∈ range (n + 1), (-1) ^ (m + n) * x ^ m * y ^ (n - m) * n.choose m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, add_pow]
congr! 1 with m hm
have : (-1 : R) ^ (n - m) = (-1) ^ (n + m) := by
rw [mem_range] at hm
simp [show n + m = n - m + 2 * m by omega, pow_add]
rw [neg_pow, this]
ring
namespace Nat
/-- The sum of entries in a row of Pascal's triangle -/
theorem sum_range_choose (n : ℕ) : (∑ m ∈ range (n + 1), n.choose m) = 2 ^ n := by
have := (add_pow 1 1 n).symm
simpa [one_add_one_eq_two] using this
theorem sum_range_choose_halfway (m : ℕ) : (∑ i ∈ range (m + 1), (2 * m + 1).choose i) = 4 ^ m :=
have : (∑ i ∈ range (m + 1), (2 * m + 1).choose (2 * m + 1 - i)) =
∑ i ∈ range (m + 1), (2 * m + 1).choose i :=
sum_congr rfl fun i hi ↦ choose_symm <| by linarith [mem_range.1 hi]
mul_right_injective₀ two_ne_zero <|
calc
(2 * ∑ i ∈ range (m + 1), (2 * m + 1).choose i) =
(∑ i ∈ range (m + 1), (2 * m + 1).choose i) +
∑ i ∈ range (m + 1), (2 * m + 1).choose (2 * m + 1 - i) := by rw [two_mul, this]
_ = (∑ i ∈ range (m + 1), (2 * m + 1).choose i) +
∑ i ∈ Ico (m + 1) (2 * m + 2), (2 * m + 1).choose i := by
rw [range_eq_Ico, sum_Ico_reflect _ _ (by omega)]
congr
omega
_ = ∑ i ∈ range (2 * m + 2), (2 * m + 1).choose i := sum_range_add_sum_Ico _ (by omega)
_ = 2 ^ (2 * m + 1) := sum_range_choose (2 * m + 1)
_ = 2 * 4 ^ m := by rw [pow_succ, pow_mul, mul_comm]; rfl
theorem choose_middle_le_pow (n : ℕ) : (2 * n + 1).choose n ≤ 4 ^ n := by
have t : (2 * n + 1).choose n ≤ ∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), (2 * n + 1).choose i :=
single_le_sum (fun x _ ↦ by omega) (self_mem_range_succ n)
simpa [sum_range_choose_halfway n] using t
theorem four_pow_le_two_mul_add_one_mul_central_binom (n : ℕ) :
| 4 ^ n ≤ (2 * n + 1) * (2 * n).choose n :=
calc
4 ^ n = (1 + 1) ^ (2 * n) := by norm_num [pow_mul]
_ = ∑ m ∈ range (2 * n + 1), (2 * n).choose m := by set_option simprocs false in simp [add_pow]
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Choose/Sum.lean | 118 | 121 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot, Yury Kudryashov, Kevin H. Wilson, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Tendsto
/-!
# Product and coproduct filters
In this file we define `Filter.prod f g` (notation: `f ×ˢ g`) and `Filter.coprod f g`. The product
of two filters is the largest filter `l` such that `Filter.Tendsto Prod.fst l f` and
`Filter.Tendsto Prod.snd l g`.
## Implementation details
The product filter cannot be defined using the monad structure on filters. For example:
```lean
F := do {x ← seq, y ← top, return (x, y)}
G := do {y ← top, x ← seq, return (x, y)}
```
hence:
```lean
s ∈ F ↔ ∃ n, [n..∞] × univ ⊆ s
s ∈ G ↔ ∀ i:ℕ, ∃ n, [n..∞] × {i} ⊆ s
```
Now `⋃ i, [i..∞] × {i}` is in `G` but not in `F`.
As product filter we want to have `F` as result.
## Notations
* `f ×ˢ g` : `Filter.prod f g`, localized in `Filter`.
-/
open Set
open Filter
namespace Filter
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
section Prod
variable {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β}
theorem prod_mem_prod (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s ×ˢ t ∈ f ×ˢ g :=
inter_mem_inf (preimage_mem_comap hs) (preimage_mem_comap ht)
theorem mem_prod_iff {s : Set (α × β)} {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ ×ˢ t₂ ⊆ s := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨t₁, ⟨s₁, hs₁, hts₁⟩, t₂, ⟨s₂, hs₂, hts₂⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨s₁, hs₁, s₂, hs₂, fun p ⟨h, h'⟩ => ⟨hts₁ h, hts₂ h'⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨t₁, ht₁, t₂, ht₂, h⟩
exact mem_inf_of_inter (preimage_mem_comap ht₁) (preimage_mem_comap ht₂) h
@[simp]
theorem compl_diagonal_mem_prod {l₁ l₂ : Filter α} : (diagonal α)ᶜ ∈ l₁ ×ˢ l₂ ↔ Disjoint l₁ l₂ := by
simp only [mem_prod_iff, Filter.disjoint_iff, prod_subset_compl_diagonal_iff_disjoint]
@[simp]
theorem prod_mem_prod_iff [f.NeBot] [g.NeBot] : s ×ˢ t ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ g :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨_s', hs', _t', ht', H⟩ := mem_prod_iff.1 h
(prod_subset_prod_iff.1 H).elim
(fun ⟨hs's, ht't⟩ => ⟨mem_of_superset hs' hs's, mem_of_superset ht' ht't⟩) fun h =>
h.elim (fun hs'e => absurd hs'e (nonempty_of_mem hs').ne_empty) fun ht'e =>
absurd ht'e (nonempty_of_mem ht').ne_empty,
fun h => prod_mem_prod h.1 h.2⟩
theorem mem_prod_principal {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ 𝓟 t ↔ { a | ∀ b ∈ t, (a, b) ∈ s } ∈ f := by
rw [← @exists_mem_subset_iff _ f, mem_prod_iff]
refine exists_congr fun u => Iff.rfl.and ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨t, mem_principal_self t, ?_⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨v, v_in, hv⟩ a a_in b b_in
exact hv (mk_mem_prod a_in <| v_in b_in)
· rintro ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩
exact h hx y hy
theorem mem_prod_top {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ (⊤ : Filter β) ↔ { a | ∀ b, (a, b) ∈ s } ∈ f := by
rw [← principal_univ, mem_prod_principal]
simp only [mem_univ, forall_true_left]
theorem eventually_prod_principal_iff {p : α × β → Prop} {s : Set β} :
(∀ᶠ x : α × β in f ×ˢ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x : α in f, ∀ y : β, y ∈ s → p (x, y) := by
rw [eventually_iff, eventually_iff, mem_prod_principal]
simp only [mem_setOf_eq]
theorem comap_prod (f : α → β × γ) (b : Filter β) (c : Filter γ) :
comap f (b ×ˢ c) = comap (Prod.fst ∘ f) b ⊓ comap (Prod.snd ∘ f) c := by
rw [prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, Filter.comap_comap, Filter.comap_comap]
theorem comap_prodMap_prod (f : α → β) (g : γ → δ) (lb : Filter β) (ld : Filter δ) :
comap (Prod.map f g) (lb ×ˢ ld) = comap f lb ×ˢ comap g ld := by
simp [prod_eq_inf, comap_comap, Function.comp_def]
theorem prod_top : f ×ˢ (⊤ : Filter β) = f.comap Prod.fst := by
rw [prod_eq_inf, comap_top, inf_top_eq]
theorem top_prod : (⊤ : Filter α) ×ˢ g = g.comap Prod.snd := by
rw [prod_eq_inf, comap_top, top_inf_eq]
theorem sup_prod (f₁ f₂ : Filter α) (g : Filter β) : (f₁ ⊔ f₂) ×ˢ g = (f₁ ×ˢ g) ⊔ (f₂ ×ˢ g) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_sup, inf_sup_right]
theorem prod_sup (f : Filter α) (g₁ g₂ : Filter β) : f ×ˢ (g₁ ⊔ g₂) = (f ×ˢ g₁) ⊔ (f ×ˢ g₂) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_sup, inf_sup_left]
theorem eventually_prod_iff {p : α × β → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ×ˢ g, p x) ↔
∃ pa : α → Prop, (∀ᶠ x in f, pa x) ∧ ∃ pb : β → Prop, (∀ᶠ y in g, pb y) ∧
∀ {x}, pa x → ∀ {y}, pb y → p (x, y) := by
simpa only [Set.prod_subset_iff] using @mem_prod_iff α β p f g
theorem tendsto_fst : Tendsto Prod.fst (f ×ˢ g) f :=
tendsto_inf_left tendsto_comap
theorem tendsto_snd : Tendsto Prod.snd (f ×ˢ g) g :=
tendsto_inf_right tendsto_comap
/-- If a function tends to a product `g ×ˢ h` of filters, then its first component tends to
`g`. See also `Filter.Tendsto.fst_nhds` for the special case of converging to a point in a
product of two topological spaces. -/
theorem Tendsto.fst {h : Filter γ} {m : α → β × γ} (H : Tendsto m f (g ×ˢ h)) :
Tendsto (fun a ↦ (m a).1) f g :=
tendsto_fst.comp H
/-- If a function tends to a product `g ×ˢ h` of filters, then its second component tends to
`h`. See also `Filter.Tendsto.snd_nhds` for the special case of converging to a point in a
product of two topological spaces. -/
theorem Tendsto.snd {h : Filter γ} {m : α → β × γ} (H : Tendsto m f (g ×ˢ h)) :
Tendsto (fun a ↦ (m a).2) f h :=
tendsto_snd.comp H
theorem Tendsto.prodMk {h : Filter γ} {m₁ : α → β} {m₂ : α → γ}
(h₁ : Tendsto m₁ f g) (h₂ : Tendsto m₂ f h) : Tendsto (fun x => (m₁ x, m₂ x)) f (g ×ˢ h) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₁, tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₂⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias Tendsto.prod_mk := Tendsto.prodMk
theorem tendsto_prod_swap : Tendsto (Prod.swap : α × β → β × α) (f ×ˢ g) (g ×ˢ f) :=
tendsto_snd.prodMk tendsto_fst
theorem Eventually.prod_inl {la : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in la, p x) (lb : Filter β) :
∀ᶠ x in la ×ˢ lb, p (x : α × β).1 :=
tendsto_fst.eventually h
theorem Eventually.prod_inr {lb : Filter β} {p : β → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in lb, p x) (la : Filter α) :
∀ᶠ x in la ×ˢ lb, p (x : α × β).2 :=
tendsto_snd.eventually h
theorem Eventually.prod_mk {la : Filter α} {pa : α → Prop} (ha : ∀ᶠ x in la, pa x) {lb : Filter β}
{pb : β → Prop} (hb : ∀ᶠ y in lb, pb y) : ∀ᶠ p in la ×ˢ lb, pa (p : α × β).1 ∧ pb p.2 :=
(ha.prod_inl lb).and (hb.prod_inr la)
theorem EventuallyEq.prodMap {δ} {la : Filter α} {fa ga : α → γ} (ha : fa =ᶠ[la] ga)
{lb : Filter β} {fb gb : β → δ} (hb : fb =ᶠ[lb] gb) :
Prod.map fa fb =ᶠ[la ×ˢ lb] Prod.map ga gb :=
(Eventually.prod_mk ha hb).mono fun _ h => Prod.ext h.1 h.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias EventuallyEq.prod_map := EventuallyEq.prodMap
theorem EventuallyLE.prodMap {δ} [LE γ] [LE δ] {la : Filter α} {fa ga : α → γ} (ha : fa ≤ᶠ[la] ga)
{lb : Filter β} {fb gb : β → δ} (hb : fb ≤ᶠ[lb] gb) :
Prod.map fa fb ≤ᶠ[la ×ˢ lb] Prod.map ga gb :=
Eventually.prod_mk ha hb
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias EventuallyLE.prod_map := EventuallyLE.prodMap
theorem Eventually.curry {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {p : α × β → Prop}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in la ×ˢ lb, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in la, ∀ᶠ y in lb, p (x, y) := by
rcases eventually_prod_iff.1 h with ⟨pa, ha, pb, hb, h⟩
exact ha.mono fun a ha => hb.mono fun b hb => h ha hb
protected lemma Frequently.uncurry {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {p : α → β → Prop}
(h : ∃ᶠ x in la, ∃ᶠ y in lb, p x y) : ∃ᶠ xy in la ×ˢ lb, p xy.1 xy.2 :=
mt (fun h ↦ by simpa only [not_frequently] using h.curry) h
lemma Frequently.of_curry {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {p : α × β → Prop}
(h : ∃ᶠ x in la, ∃ᶠ y in lb, p (x, y)) : ∃ᶠ xy in la ×ˢ lb, p xy :=
h.uncurry
/-- A fact that is eventually true about all pairs `l ×ˢ l` is eventually true about
all diagonal pairs `(i, i)` -/
theorem Eventually.diag_of_prod {p : α × α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ i in f ×ˢ f, p i) :
∀ᶠ i in f, p (i, i) := by
obtain ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hst⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.1 h
apply (ht.and hs).mono fun x hx => hst hx.1 hx.2
theorem Eventually.diag_of_prod_left {f : Filter α} {g : Filter γ} {p : (α × α) × γ → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in (f ×ˢ f) ×ˢ g, p x) → ∀ᶠ x : α × γ in f ×ˢ g, p ((x.1, x.1), x.2) := by
intro h
obtain ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hst⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.1 h
exact (ht.diag_of_prod.prod_mk hs).mono fun x hx => by simp only [hst hx.1 hx.2]
theorem Eventually.diag_of_prod_right {f : Filter α} {g : Filter γ} {p : α × γ × γ → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ g), p x) → ∀ᶠ x : α × γ in f ×ˢ g, p (x.1, x.2, x.2) := by
intro h
obtain ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hst⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.1 h
exact (ht.prod_mk hs.diag_of_prod).mono fun x hx => by simp only [hst hx.1 hx.2]
theorem tendsto_diag : Tendsto (fun i => (i, i)) f (f ×ˢ f) :=
tendsto_iff_eventually.mpr fun _ hpr => hpr.diag_of_prod
theorem prod_iInf_left [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → Filter α} {g : Filter β} :
(⨅ i, f i) ×ˢ g = ⨅ i, f i ×ˢ g := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_iInf, iInf_inf]
theorem prod_iInf_right [Nonempty ι] {f : Filter α} {g : ι → Filter β} :
(f ×ˢ ⨅ i, g i) = ⨅ i, f ×ˢ g i := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_iInf, inf_iInf]
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem prod_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) (hg : g₁ ≤ g₂) :
f₁ ×ˢ g₁ ≤ f₂ ×ˢ g₂ :=
inf_le_inf (comap_mono hf) (comap_mono hg)
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_left (g : Filter β) {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) : f₁ ×ˢ g ≤ f₂ ×ˢ g :=
Filter.prod_mono hf rfl.le
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_right (f : Filter α) {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} (hf : g₁ ≤ g₂) : f ×ˢ g₁ ≤ f ×ˢ g₂ :=
Filter.prod_mono rfl.le hf
theorem prod_comap_comap_eq.{u, v, w, x} {α₁ : Type u} {α₂ : Type v} {β₁ : Type w} {β₂ : Type x}
{f₁ : Filter α₁} {f₂ : Filter α₂} {m₁ : β₁ → α₁} {m₂ : β₂ → α₂} :
comap m₁ f₁ ×ˢ comap m₂ f₂ = comap (fun p : β₁ × β₂ => (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) (f₁ ×ˢ f₂) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_comap, comap_inf, Function.comp_def]
theorem prod_comm' : f ×ˢ g = comap Prod.swap (g ×ˢ f) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_comap, Function.comp_def, inf_comm, Prod.swap, comap_inf]
theorem prod_comm : f ×ˢ g = map (fun p : β × α => (p.2, p.1)) (g ×ˢ f) := by
rw [prod_comm', ← map_swap_eq_comap_swap]
rfl
theorem mem_prod_iff_left {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ᶠ y in g, ∀ x ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ s := by
simp only [mem_prod_iff, prod_subset_iff]
refine exists_congr fun _ => Iff.rfl.and <| Iff.trans ?_ exists_mem_subset_iff
exact exists_congr fun _ => Iff.rfl.and forall₂_swap
theorem mem_prod_iff_right {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ᶠ x in f, ∀ y ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ s := by
rw [prod_comm, mem_map, mem_prod_iff_left]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_fst_prod (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) [NeBot g] : map Prod.fst (f ×ˢ g) = f := by
ext s
simp only [mem_map, mem_prod_iff_left, mem_preimage, eventually_const, ← subset_def,
exists_mem_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem map_snd_prod (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) [NeBot f] : map Prod.snd (f ×ˢ g) = g := by
rw [prod_comm, map_map]; apply map_fst_prod
@[simp]
theorem prod_le_prod {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} [NeBot f₁] [NeBot g₁] :
f₁ ×ˢ g₁ ≤ f₂ ×ˢ g₂ ↔ f₁ ≤ f₂ ∧ g₁ ≤ g₂ :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨map_fst_prod f₁ g₁ ▸ tendsto_fst.mono_left h, map_snd_prod f₁ g₁ ▸ tendsto_snd.mono_left h⟩,
fun h => prod_mono h.1 h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem prod_inj {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} [NeBot f₁] [NeBot g₁] :
f₁ ×ˢ g₁ = f₂ ×ˢ g₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ ∧ g₁ = g₂ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.1 ▸ h.2 ▸ rfl⟩
have hle : f₁ ≤ f₂ ∧ g₁ ≤ g₂ := prod_le_prod.1 h.le
haveI := neBot_of_le hle.1; haveI := neBot_of_le hle.2
exact ⟨hle.1.antisymm <| (prod_le_prod.1 h.ge).1, hle.2.antisymm <| (prod_le_prod.1 h.ge).2⟩
theorem eventually_swap_iff {p : α × β → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x : α × β in f ×ˢ g, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ y : β × α in g ×ˢ f, p y.swap := by
rw [prod_comm]; rfl
theorem prod_assoc (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) (h : Filter γ) :
map (Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ h) = f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ h) := by
simp_rw [← comap_equiv_symm, prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, comap_comap, inf_assoc,
Function.comp_def, Equiv.prodAssoc_symm_apply]
theorem prod_assoc_symm (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) (h : Filter γ) :
map (Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ).symm (f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ h)) = (f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ h := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_symm, prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, comap_comap, inf_assoc,
Function.comp_def, Equiv.prodAssoc_apply]
theorem tendsto_prodAssoc {h : Filter γ} :
Tendsto (Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ h) (f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ h)) :=
(prod_assoc f g h).le
theorem tendsto_prodAssoc_symm {h : Filter γ} :
Tendsto (Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ).symm (f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ h)) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ h) :=
(prod_assoc_symm f g h).le
/-- A useful lemma when dealing with uniformities. -/
theorem map_swap4_prod {h : Filter γ} {k : Filter δ} :
map (fun p : (α × β) × γ × δ => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ (h ×ˢ k)) =
(f ×ˢ h) ×ˢ (g ×ˢ k) := by
simp_rw [map_swap4_eq_comap, prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, comap_comap]; ac_rfl
theorem tendsto_swap4_prod {h : Filter γ} {k : Filter δ} :
Tendsto (fun p : (α × β) × γ × δ => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ (h ×ˢ k))
((f ×ˢ h) ×ˢ (g ×ˢ k)) :=
map_swap4_prod.le
theorem prod_map_map_eq.{u, v, w, x} {α₁ : Type u} {α₂ : Type v} {β₁ : Type w} {β₂ : Type x}
{f₁ : Filter α₁} {f₂ : Filter α₂} {m₁ : α₁ → β₁} {m₂ : α₂ → β₂} :
map m₁ f₁ ×ˢ map m₂ f₂ = map (fun p : α₁ × α₂ => (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) (f₁ ×ˢ f₂) :=
le_antisymm
(fun s hs =>
let ⟨s₁, hs₁, s₂, hs₂, h⟩ := mem_prod_iff.mp hs
mem_of_superset (prod_mem_prod (image_mem_map hs₁) (image_mem_map hs₂)) <|
by rwa [prod_image_image_eq, image_subset_iff])
((tendsto_map.comp tendsto_fst).prodMk (tendsto_map.comp tendsto_snd))
theorem prod_map_map_eq' {α₁ : Type*} {α₂ : Type*} {β₁ : Type*} {β₂ : Type*} (f : α₁ → α₂)
(g : β₁ → β₂) (F : Filter α₁) (G : Filter β₁) :
map f F ×ˢ map g G = map (Prod.map f g) (F ×ˢ G) :=
prod_map_map_eq
theorem prod_map_left (f : α → β) (F : Filter α) (G : Filter γ) :
map f F ×ˢ G = map (Prod.map f id) (F ×ˢ G) := by
rw [← prod_map_map_eq', map_id]
theorem prod_map_right (f : β → γ) (F : Filter α) (G : Filter β) :
F ×ˢ map f G = map (Prod.map id f) (F ×ˢ G) := by
rw [← prod_map_map_eq', map_id]
theorem le_prod_map_fst_snd {f : Filter (α × β)} : f ≤ map Prod.fst f ×ˢ map Prod.snd f :=
le_inf le_comap_map le_comap_map
theorem Tendsto.prodMap {δ : Type*} {f : α → γ} {g : β → δ} {a : Filter α} {b : Filter β}
{c : Filter γ} {d : Filter δ} (hf : Tendsto f a c) (hg : Tendsto g b d) :
Tendsto (Prod.map f g) (a ×ˢ b) (c ×ˢ d) := by
rw [Tendsto, Prod.map_def, ← prod_map_map_eq]
exact Filter.prod_mono hf hg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias Tendsto.prod_map := Tendsto.prodMap
protected theorem map_prod (m : α × β → γ) (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) :
map m (f ×ˢ g) = (f.map fun a b => m (a, b)).seq g := by
simp only [Filter.ext_iff, mem_map, mem_prod_iff, mem_map_seq_iff, exists_and_left]
intro s
constructor
· exact fun ⟨t, ht, s, hs, h⟩ => ⟨s, hs, t, ht, fun x hx y hy => @h ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩⟩
· exact fun ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩ => ⟨t, ht, s, hs, fun ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩ => h x hx y hy⟩
theorem prod_eq : f ×ˢ g = (f.map Prod.mk).seq g := f.map_prod id g
theorem prod_inf_prod {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} :
(f₁ ×ˢ g₁) ⊓ (f₂ ×ˢ g₂) = (f₁ ⊓ f₂) ×ˢ (g₁ ⊓ g₂) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, inf_comm, inf_assoc, inf_left_comm]
theorem inf_prod {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} : (f₁ ⊓ f₂) ×ˢ g = (f₁ ×ˢ g) ⊓ (f₂ ×ˢ g) := by
rw [prod_inf_prod, inf_idem]
theorem prod_inf {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} : f ×ˢ (g₁ ⊓ g₂) = (f ×ˢ g₁) ⊓ (f ×ˢ g₂) := by
rw [prod_inf_prod, inf_idem]
@[simp]
theorem prod_principal_principal {s : Set α} {t : Set β} : 𝓟 s ×ˢ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ×ˢ t) := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, comap_principal, principal_eq_iff_eq, comap_principal, inf_principal]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem pure_prod {a : α} {f : Filter β} : pure a ×ˢ f = map (Prod.mk a) f := by
rw [prod_eq, map_pure, pure_seq_eq_map]
theorem map_pure_prod (f : α → β → γ) (a : α) (B : Filter β) :
map (Function.uncurry f) (pure a ×ˢ B) = map (f a) B := by
rw [Filter.pure_prod]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem prod_pure {b : β} : f ×ˢ pure b = map (fun a => (a, b)) f := by
rw [prod_eq, seq_pure, map_map]; rfl
theorem prod_pure_pure {a : α} {b : β} :
(pure a : Filter α) ×ˢ (pure b : Filter β) = pure (a, b) := by simp
@[simp]
theorem prod_eq_bot : f ×ˢ g = ⊥ ↔ f = ⊥ ∨ g = ⊥ := by
simp_rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_prod_iff, subset_empty_iff, prod_eq_empty_iff, ← exists_prop,
Subtype.exists', exists_or, exists_const, Subtype.exists, exists_prop, exists_eq_right]
@[simp] theorem prod_bot : f ×ˢ (⊥ : Filter β) = ⊥ := prod_eq_bot.2 <| Or.inr rfl
@[simp] theorem bot_prod : (⊥ : Filter α) ×ˢ g = ⊥ := prod_eq_bot.2 <| Or.inl rfl
theorem prod_neBot : NeBot (f ×ˢ g) ↔ NeBot f ∧ NeBot g := by
simp only [neBot_iff, Ne, prod_eq_bot, not_or]
protected theorem NeBot.prod (hf : NeBot f) (hg : NeBot g) : NeBot (f ×ˢ g) := prod_neBot.2 ⟨hf, hg⟩
instance prod.instNeBot [hf : NeBot f] [hg : NeBot g] : NeBot (f ×ˢ g) := hf.prod hg
@[simp]
lemma disjoint_prod {f' : Filter α} {g' : Filter β} :
Disjoint (f ×ˢ g) (f' ×ˢ g') ↔ Disjoint f f' ∨ Disjoint g g' := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, prod_inf_prod, prod_eq_bot]
/-- `p ∧ q` occurs frequently along the product of two filters
iff both `p` and `q` occur frequently along the corresponding filters. -/
theorem frequently_prod_and {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ×ˢ g, p x.1 ∧ q x.2) ↔ (∃ᶠ a in f, p a) ∧ ∃ᶠ b in g, q b := by
simp only [frequently_iff_neBot, ← prod_neBot, ← prod_inf_prod, prod_principal_principal]
rfl
theorem tendsto_prod_iff {f : α × β → γ} {x : Filter α} {y : Filter β} {z : Filter γ} :
Tendsto f (x ×ˢ y) z ↔ ∀ W ∈ z, ∃ U ∈ x, ∃ V ∈ y, ∀ x y, x ∈ U → y ∈ V → f (x, y) ∈ W := by
simp only [tendsto_def, mem_prod_iff, prod_sub_preimage_iff, exists_prop]
theorem tendsto_prod_iff' {g' : Filter γ} {s : α → β × γ} :
Tendsto s f (g ×ˢ g') ↔ Tendsto (fun n => (s n).1) f g ∧ Tendsto (fun n => (s n).2) f g' := by
simp only [prod_eq_inf, tendsto_inf, tendsto_comap_iff, Function.comp_def]
theorem le_prod {f : Filter (α × β)} {g : Filter α} {g' : Filter β} :
(f ≤ g ×ˢ g') ↔ Tendsto Prod.fst f g ∧ Tendsto Prod.snd f g' :=
tendsto_prod_iff'
end Prod
/-! ### Coproducts of filters -/
section Coprod
variable {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β}
theorem coprod_eq_prod_top_sup_top_prod (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) :
Filter.coprod f g = f ×ˢ ⊤ ⊔ ⊤ ×ˢ g := by
rw [prod_top, top_prod]
rfl
theorem mem_coprod_iff {s : Set (α × β)} {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β} :
s ∈ f.coprod g ↔ (∃ t₁ ∈ f, Prod.fst ⁻¹' t₁ ⊆ s) ∧ ∃ t₂ ∈ g, Prod.snd ⁻¹' t₂ ⊆ s := by
simp [Filter.coprod]
@[simp]
theorem bot_coprod (l : Filter β) : (⊥ : Filter α).coprod l = comap Prod.snd l := by
simp [Filter.coprod]
@[simp]
theorem coprod_bot (l : Filter α) : l.coprod (⊥ : Filter β) = comap Prod.fst l := by
simp [Filter.coprod]
theorem bot_coprod_bot : (⊥ : Filter α).coprod (⊥ : Filter β) = ⊥ := by simp
theorem compl_mem_coprod {s : Set (α × β)} {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} :
sᶜ ∈ la.coprod lb ↔ (Prod.fst '' s)ᶜ ∈ la ∧ (Prod.snd '' s)ᶜ ∈ lb := by
simp only [Filter.coprod, mem_sup, compl_mem_comap]
@[mono]
theorem coprod_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) (hg : g₁ ≤ g₂) :
f₁.coprod g₁ ≤ f₂.coprod g₂ :=
sup_le_sup (comap_mono hf) (comap_mono hg)
theorem coprod_neBot_iff : (f.coprod g).NeBot ↔ f.NeBot ∧ Nonempty β ∨ Nonempty α ∧ g.NeBot := by
simp [Filter.coprod]
@[instance]
theorem coprod_neBot_left [NeBot f] [Nonempty β] : (f.coprod g).NeBot :=
coprod_neBot_iff.2 (Or.inl ⟨‹_›, ‹_›⟩)
@[instance]
theorem coprod_neBot_right [NeBot g] [Nonempty α] : (f.coprod g).NeBot :=
coprod_neBot_iff.2 (Or.inr ⟨‹_›, ‹_›⟩)
theorem coprod_inf_prod_le (f₁ f₂ : Filter α) (g₁ g₂ : Filter β) :
f₁.coprod g₁ ⊓ f₂ ×ˢ g₂ ≤ f₁ ×ˢ g₂ ⊔ f₂ ×ˢ g₁ := calc
f₁.coprod g₁ ⊓ f₂ ×ˢ g₂
_ = (f₁ ×ˢ ⊤ ⊔ ⊤ ×ˢ g₁) ⊓ f₂ ×ˢ g₂ := by rw [coprod_eq_prod_top_sup_top_prod]
_ = f₁ ×ˢ ⊤ ⊓ f₂ ×ˢ g₂ ⊔ ⊤ ×ˢ g₁ ⊓ f₂ ×ˢ g₂ := inf_sup_right _ _ _
_ = (f₁ ⊓ f₂) ×ˢ g₂ ⊔ f₂ ×ˢ (g₁ ⊓ g₂) := by simp [prod_inf_prod]
_ ≤ f₁ ×ˢ g₂ ⊔ f₂ ×ˢ g₁ :=
sup_le_sup (prod_mono inf_le_left le_rfl) (prod_mono le_rfl inf_le_left)
theorem principal_coprod_principal (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
(𝓟 s).coprod (𝓟 t) = 𝓟 (sᶜ ×ˢ tᶜ)ᶜ := by
rw [Filter.coprod, comap_principal, comap_principal, sup_principal, Set.prod_eq, compl_inter,
preimage_compl, preimage_compl, compl_compl, compl_compl]
-- this inequality can be strict; see `map_const_principal_coprod_map_id_principal` and
-- `map_prodMap_const_id_principal_coprod_principal` below.
theorem map_prodMap_coprod_le.{u, v, w, x} {α₁ : Type u} {α₂ : Type v} {β₁ : Type w} {β₂ : Type x}
{f₁ : Filter α₁} {f₂ : Filter α₂} {m₁ : α₁ → β₁} {m₂ : α₂ → β₂} :
map (Prod.map m₁ m₂) (f₁.coprod f₂) ≤ (map m₁ f₁).coprod (map m₂ f₂) := by
intro s
simp only [mem_map, mem_coprod_iff]
rintro ⟨⟨u₁, hu₁, h₁⟩, u₂, hu₂, h₂⟩
refine ⟨⟨m₁ ⁻¹' u₁, hu₁, fun _ hx => h₁ ?_⟩, ⟨m₂ ⁻¹' u₂, hu₂, fun _ hx => h₂ ?_⟩⟩ <;> convert hx
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias map_prod_map_coprod_le := map_prodMap_coprod_le
/-- Characterization of the coproduct of the `Filter.map`s of two principal filters `𝓟 {a}` and
`𝓟 {i}`, the first under the constant function `fun a => b` and the second under the identity
function. Together with the next lemma, `map_prodMap_const_id_principal_coprod_principal`, this
provides an example showing that the inequality in the lemma `map_prodMap_coprod_le` can be strict.
-/
theorem map_const_principal_coprod_map_id_principal {α β ι : Type*} (a : α) (b : β) (i : ι) :
(map (fun _ => b) (𝓟 {a})).coprod (map id (𝓟 {i})) =
𝓟 ((({b} : Set β) ×ˢ univ) ∪ (univ ×ˢ ({i} : Set ι))) := by
simp only [map_principal, Filter.coprod, comap_principal, sup_principal, image_singleton,
image_id, prod_univ, univ_prod, id]
/-- Characterization of the `Filter.map` of the coproduct of two principal filters `𝓟 {a}` and
`𝓟 {i}`, under the `Prod.map` of two functions, respectively the constant function `fun a => b` and
the identity function. Together with the previous lemma,
`map_const_principal_coprod_map_id_principal`, this provides an example showing that the inequality
in the lemma `map_prodMap_coprod_le` can be strict. -/
theorem map_prodMap_const_id_principal_coprod_principal {α β ι : Type*} (a : α) (b : β) (i : ι) :
map (Prod.map (fun _ : α => b) id) ((𝓟 {a}).coprod (𝓟 {i})) =
𝓟 (({b} : Set β) ×ˢ (univ : Set ι)) := by
rw [principal_coprod_principal, map_principal]
congr
ext ⟨b', i'⟩
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨a'', i''⟩, _, h₂, h₃⟩
simp
· rintro ⟨h₁, _⟩
use (a, i')
simpa using h₁.symm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias map_prod_map_const_id_principal_coprod_principal :=
map_prodMap_const_id_principal_coprod_principal
theorem Tendsto.prodMap_coprod {δ : Type*} {f : α → γ} {g : β → δ} {a : Filter α} {b : Filter β}
{c : Filter γ} {d : Filter δ} (hf : Tendsto f a c) (hg : Tendsto g b d) :
Tendsto (Prod.map f g) (a.coprod b) (c.coprod d) :=
map_prodMap_coprod_le.trans (coprod_mono hf hg)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias Tendsto.prod_map_coprod := Tendsto.prodMap_coprod
end Coprod
end Filter
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Prod.lean | 573 | 577 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Computability.Tape
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Option
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.PFun
import Mathlib.Computability.PostTuringMachine
/-!
# Turing machines
The files `PostTuringMachine.lean` and `TuringMachine.lean` define
a sequence of simple machine languages, starting with Turing machines and working
up to more complex languages based on Wang B-machines.
`PostTuringMachine.lean` covers the TM0 model and TM1 model;
`TuringMachine.lean` adds the TM2 model.
## Naming conventions
Each model of computation in this file shares a naming convention for the elements of a model of
computation. These are the parameters for the language:
* `Γ` is the alphabet on the tape.
* `Λ` is the set of labels, or internal machine states.
* `σ` is the type of internal memory, not on the tape. This does not exist in the TM0 model, and
later models achieve this by mixing it into `Λ`.
* `K` is used in the TM2 model, which has multiple stacks, and denotes the number of such stacks.
All of these variables denote "essentially finite" types, but for technical reasons it is
convenient to allow them to be infinite anyway. When using an infinite type, we will be interested
to prove that only finitely many values of the type are ever interacted with.
Given these parameters, there are a few common structures for the model that arise:
* `Stmt` is the set of all actions that can be performed in one step. For the TM0 model this set is
finite, and for later models it is an infinite inductive type representing "possible program
texts".
* `Cfg` is the set of instantaneous configurations, that is, the state of the machine together with
its environment.
* `Machine` is the set of all machines in the model. Usually this is approximately a function
`Λ → Stmt`, although different models have different ways of halting and other actions.
* `step : Cfg → Option Cfg` is the function that describes how the state evolves over one step.
If `step c = none`, then `c` is a terminal state, and the result of the computation is read off
from `c`. Because of the type of `step`, these models are all deterministic by construction.
* `init : Input → Cfg` sets up the initial state. The type `Input` depends on the model;
in most cases it is `List Γ`.
* `eval : Machine → Input → Part Output`, given a machine `M` and input `i`, starts from
`init i`, runs `step` until it reaches an output, and then applies a function `Cfg → Output` to
the final state to obtain the result. The type `Output` depends on the model.
* `Supports : Machine → Finset Λ → Prop` asserts that a machine `M` starts in `S : Finset Λ`, and
can only ever jump to other states inside `S`. This implies that the behavior of `M` on any input
cannot depend on its values outside `S`. We use this to allow `Λ` to be an infinite set when
convenient, and prove that only finitely many of these states are actually accessible. This
formalizes "essentially finite" mentioned above.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open List (Vector)
open Relation
open Nat (iterate)
open Function (update iterate_succ iterate_succ_apply iterate_succ' iterate_succ_apply'
iterate_zero_apply)
namespace Turing
/-!
## The TM2 model
The TM2 model removes the tape entirely from the TM1 model, replacing it with an arbitrary (finite)
collection of stacks, each with elements of different types (the alphabet of stack `k : K` is
`Γ k`). The statements are:
* `push k (f : σ → Γ k) q` puts `f a` on the `k`-th stack, then does `q`.
* `pop k (f : σ → Option (Γ k) → σ) q` changes the state to `f a (S k).head`, where `S k` is the
value of the `k`-th stack, and removes this element from the stack, then does `q`.
* `peek k (f : σ → Option (Γ k) → σ) q` changes the state to `f a (S k).head`, where `S k` is the
value of the `k`-th stack, then does `q`.
* `load (f : σ → σ) q` reads nothing but applies `f` to the internal state, then does `q`.
* `branch (f : σ → Bool) qtrue qfalse` does `qtrue` or `qfalse` according to `f a`.
* `goto (f : σ → Λ)` jumps to label `f a`.
* `halt` halts on the next step.
The configuration is a tuple `(l, var, stk)` where `l : Option Λ` is the current label to run or
`none` for the halting state, `var : σ` is the (finite) internal state, and `stk : ∀ k, List (Γ k)`
is the collection of stacks. (Note that unlike the `TM0` and `TM1` models, these are not
`ListBlank`s, they have definite ends that can be detected by the `pop` command.)
Given a designated stack `k` and a value `L : List (Γ k)`, the initial configuration has all the
stacks empty except the designated "input" stack; in `eval` this designated stack also functions
as the output stack.
-/
namespace TM2
variable {K : Type*}
-- Index type of stacks
variable (Γ : K → Type*)
-- Type of stack elements
variable (Λ : Type*)
-- Type of function labels
variable (σ : Type*)
-- Type of variable settings
/-- The TM2 model removes the tape entirely from the TM1 model,
replacing it with an arbitrary (finite) collection of stacks.
The operation `push` puts an element on one of the stacks,
and `pop` removes an element from a stack (and modifying the
internal state based on the result). `peek` modifies the
internal state but does not remove an element. -/
inductive Stmt
| push : ∀ k, (σ → Γ k) → Stmt → Stmt
| peek : ∀ k, (σ → Option (Γ k) → σ) → Stmt → Stmt
| pop : ∀ k, (σ → Option (Γ k) → σ) → Stmt → Stmt
| load : (σ → σ) → Stmt → Stmt
| branch : (σ → Bool) → Stmt → Stmt → Stmt
| goto : (σ → Λ) → Stmt
| halt : Stmt
open Stmt
instance Stmt.inhabited : Inhabited (Stmt Γ Λ σ) :=
⟨halt⟩
/-- A configuration in the TM2 model is a label (or `none` for the halt state), the state of
local variables, and the stacks. (Note that the stacks are not `ListBlank`s, they have a definite
size.) -/
structure Cfg where
/-- The current label to run (or `none` for the halting state) -/
l : Option Λ
/-- The internal state -/
var : σ
/-- The (finite) collection of internal stacks -/
stk : ∀ k, List (Γ k)
instance Cfg.inhabited [Inhabited σ] : Inhabited (Cfg Γ Λ σ) :=
⟨⟨default, default, default⟩⟩
variable {Γ Λ σ}
section
variable [DecidableEq K]
/-- The step function for the TM2 model. -/
def stepAux : Stmt Γ Λ σ → σ → (∀ k, List (Γ k)) → Cfg Γ Λ σ
| push k f q, v, S => stepAux q v (update S k (f v :: S k))
| peek k f q, v, S => stepAux q (f v (S k).head?) S
| pop k f q, v, S => stepAux q (f v (S k).head?) (update S k (S k).tail)
| load a q, v, S => stepAux q (a v) S
| branch f q₁ q₂, v, S => cond (f v) (stepAux q₁ v S) (stepAux q₂ v S)
| goto f, v, S => ⟨some (f v), v, S⟩
| halt, v, S => ⟨none, v, S⟩
/-- The step function for the TM2 model. -/
def step (M : Λ → Stmt Γ Λ σ) : Cfg Γ Λ σ → Option (Cfg Γ Λ σ)
| ⟨none, _, _⟩ => none
| ⟨some l, v, S⟩ => some (stepAux (M l) v S)
attribute [simp] stepAux.eq_1 stepAux.eq_2 stepAux.eq_3
stepAux.eq_4 stepAux.eq_5 stepAux.eq_6 stepAux.eq_7 step.eq_1 step.eq_2
/-- The (reflexive) reachability relation for the TM2 model. -/
def Reaches (M : Λ → Stmt Γ Λ σ) : Cfg Γ Λ σ → Cfg Γ Λ σ → Prop :=
ReflTransGen fun a b ↦ b ∈ step M a
end
/-- Given a set `S` of states, `SupportsStmt S q` means that `q` only jumps to states in `S`. -/
def SupportsStmt (S : Finset Λ) : Stmt Γ Λ σ → Prop
| push _ _ q => SupportsStmt S q
| peek _ _ q => SupportsStmt S q
| pop _ _ q => SupportsStmt S q
| load _ q => SupportsStmt S q
| branch _ q₁ q₂ => SupportsStmt S q₁ ∧ SupportsStmt S q₂
| goto l => ∀ v, l v ∈ S
| halt => True
section
open scoped Classical in
/-- The set of subtree statements in a statement. -/
noncomputable def stmts₁ : Stmt Γ Λ σ → Finset (Stmt Γ Λ σ)
| Q@(push _ _ q) => insert Q (stmts₁ q)
| Q@(peek _ _ q) => insert Q (stmts₁ q)
| Q@(pop _ _ q) => insert Q (stmts₁ q)
| Q@(load _ q) => insert Q (stmts₁ q)
| Q@(branch _ q₁ q₂) => insert Q (stmts₁ q₁ ∪ stmts₁ q₂)
| Q@(goto _) => {Q}
| Q@halt => {Q}
theorem stmts₁_self {q : Stmt Γ Λ σ} : q ∈ stmts₁ q := by
cases q <;> simp only [Finset.mem_insert_self, Finset.mem_singleton_self, stmts₁]
theorem stmts₁_trans {q₁ q₂ : Stmt Γ Λ σ} : q₁ ∈ stmts₁ q₂ → stmts₁ q₁ ⊆ stmts₁ q₂ := by
classical
intro h₁₂ q₀ h₀₁
induction q₂ with (
simp only [stmts₁] at h₁₂ ⊢
simp only [Finset.mem_insert, Finset.mem_singleton, Finset.mem_union] at h₁₂)
| branch f q₁ q₂ IH₁ IH₂ =>
rcases h₁₂ with (rfl | h₁₂ | h₁₂)
· unfold stmts₁ at h₀₁
exact h₀₁
· exact Finset.mem_insert_of_mem (Finset.mem_union_left _ (IH₁ h₁₂))
· exact Finset.mem_insert_of_mem (Finset.mem_union_right _ (IH₂ h₁₂))
| goto l => subst h₁₂; exact h₀₁
| halt => subst h₁₂; exact h₀₁
| load _ q IH | _ _ _ q IH =>
rcases h₁₂ with (rfl | h₁₂)
· unfold stmts₁ at h₀₁
exact h₀₁
· exact Finset.mem_insert_of_mem (IH h₁₂)
theorem stmts₁_supportsStmt_mono {S : Finset Λ} {q₁ q₂ : Stmt Γ Λ σ} (h : q₁ ∈ stmts₁ q₂)
(hs : SupportsStmt S q₂) : SupportsStmt S q₁ := by
induction q₂ with
simp only [stmts₁, SupportsStmt, Finset.mem_insert, Finset.mem_union, Finset.mem_singleton]
at h hs
| branch f q₁ q₂ IH₁ IH₂ => rcases h with (rfl | h | h); exacts [hs, IH₁ h hs.1, IH₂ h hs.2]
| goto l => subst h; exact hs
| halt => subst h; trivial
| load _ _ IH | _ _ _ _ IH => rcases h with (rfl | h) <;> [exact hs; exact IH h hs]
open scoped Classical in
/-- The set of statements accessible from initial set `S` of labels. -/
noncomputable def stmts (M : Λ → Stmt Γ Λ σ) (S : Finset Λ) : Finset (Option (Stmt Γ Λ σ)) :=
Finset.insertNone (S.biUnion fun q ↦ stmts₁ (M q))
theorem stmts_trans {M : Λ → Stmt Γ Λ σ} {S : Finset Λ} {q₁ q₂ : Stmt Γ Λ σ} (h₁ : q₁ ∈ stmts₁ q₂) :
some q₂ ∈ stmts M S → some q₁ ∈ stmts M S := by
simp only [stmts, Finset.mem_insertNone, Finset.mem_biUnion, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq,
forall_eq', exists_imp, and_imp]
exact fun l ls h₂ ↦ ⟨_, ls, stmts₁_trans h₂ h₁⟩
end
variable [Inhabited Λ]
/-- Given a TM2 machine `M` and a set `S` of states, `Supports M S` means that all states in
`S` jump only to other states in `S`. -/
def Supports (M : Λ → Stmt Γ Λ σ) (S : Finset Λ) :=
default ∈ S ∧ ∀ q ∈ S, SupportsStmt S (M q)
theorem stmts_supportsStmt {M : Λ → Stmt Γ Λ σ} {S : Finset Λ} {q : Stmt Γ Λ σ}
(ss : Supports M S) : some q ∈ stmts M S → SupportsStmt S q := by
simp only [stmts, Finset.mem_insertNone, Finset.mem_biUnion, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq,
forall_eq', exists_imp, and_imp]
exact fun l ls h ↦ stmts₁_supportsStmt_mono h (ss.2 _ ls)
variable [DecidableEq K]
theorem step_supports (M : Λ → Stmt Γ Λ σ) {S : Finset Λ} (ss : Supports M S) :
∀ {c c' : Cfg Γ Λ σ}, c' ∈ step M c → c.l ∈ Finset.insertNone S → c'.l ∈ Finset.insertNone S
| ⟨some l₁, v, T⟩, c', h₁, h₂ => by
replace h₂ := ss.2 _ (Finset.some_mem_insertNone.1 h₂)
simp only [step, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq] at h₁; subst c'
revert h₂; induction M l₁ generalizing v T with intro hs
| branch p q₁' q₂' IH₁ IH₂ =>
unfold stepAux; cases p v
· exact IH₂ _ _ hs.2
· exact IH₁ _ _ hs.1
| goto => exact Finset.some_mem_insertNone.2 (hs _)
| halt => apply Multiset.mem_cons_self
| load _ _ IH | _ _ _ _ IH => exact IH _ _ hs
variable [Inhabited σ]
/-- The initial state of the TM2 model. The input is provided on a designated stack. -/
def init (k : K) (L : List (Γ k)) : Cfg Γ Λ σ :=
⟨some default, default, update (fun _ ↦ []) k L⟩
/-- Evaluates a TM2 program to completion, with the output on the same stack as the input. -/
def eval (M : Λ → Stmt Γ Λ σ) (k : K) (L : List (Γ k)) : Part (List (Γ k)) :=
(Turing.eval (step M) (init k L)).map fun c ↦ c.stk k
end TM2
/-!
## TM2 emulator in TM1
To prove that TM2 computable functions are TM1 computable, we need to reduce each TM2 program to a
TM1 program. So suppose a TM2 program is given. This program has to maintain a whole collection of
stacks, but we have only one tape, so we must "multiplex" them all together. Pictorially, if stack
1 contains `[a, b]` and stack 2 contains `[c, d, e, f]` then the tape looks like this:
```
bottom: ... | _ | T | _ | _ | _ | _ | ...
stack 1: ... | _ | b | a | _ | _ | _ | ...
stack 2: ... | _ | f | e | d | c | _ | ...
```
where a tape element is a vertical slice through the diagram. Here the alphabet is
`Γ' := Bool × ∀ k, Option (Γ k)`, where:
* `bottom : Bool` is marked only in one place, the initial position of the TM, and represents the
tail of all stacks. It is never modified.
* `stk k : Option (Γ k)` is the value of the `k`-th stack, if in range, otherwise `none` (which is
the blank value). Note that the head of the stack is at the far end; this is so that push and pop
don't have to do any shifting.
In "resting" position, the TM is sitting at the position marked `bottom`. For non-stack actions,
it operates in place, but for the stack actions `push`, `peek`, and `pop`, it must shuttle to the
end of the appropriate stack, make its changes, and then return to the bottom. So the states are:
* `normal (l : Λ)`: waiting at `bottom` to execute function `l`
* `go k (s : StAct k) (q : Stmt₂)`: travelling to the right to get to the end of stack `k` in
order to perform stack action `s`, and later continue with executing `q`
* `ret (q : Stmt₂)`: travelling to the left after having performed a stack action, and executing
`q` once we arrive
Because of the shuttling, emulation overhead is `O(n)`, where `n` is the current maximum of the
length of all stacks. Therefore a program that takes `k` steps to run in TM2 takes `O((m+k)k)`
steps to run when emulated in TM1, where `m` is the length of the input.
-/
namespace TM2to1
-- A displaced lemma proved in unnecessary generality
theorem stk_nth_val {K : Type*} {Γ : K → Type*} {L : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))} {k S} (n)
(hL : ListBlank.map (proj k) L = ListBlank.mk (List.map some S).reverse) :
L.nth n k = S.reverse[n]? := by
rw [← proj_map_nth, hL, ← List.map_reverse, ListBlank.nth_mk,
List.getI_eq_iget_getElem?, List.getElem?_map]
cases S.reverse[n]? <;> rfl
variable (K : Type*)
variable (Γ : K → Type*)
variable {Λ σ : Type*}
/-- The alphabet of the TM2 simulator on TM1 is a marker for the stack bottom,
plus a vector of stack elements for each stack, or none if the stack does not extend this far. -/
def Γ' :=
Bool × ∀ k, Option (Γ k)
variable {K Γ}
instance Γ'.inhabited : Inhabited (Γ' K Γ) :=
⟨⟨false, fun _ ↦ none⟩⟩
instance Γ'.fintype [DecidableEq K] [Fintype K] [∀ k, Fintype (Γ k)] : Fintype (Γ' K Γ) :=
instFintypeProd _ _
/-- The bottom marker is fixed throughout the calculation, so we use the `addBottom` function
to express the program state in terms of a tape with only the stacks themselves. -/
def addBottom (L : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))) : ListBlank (Γ' K Γ) :=
ListBlank.cons (true, L.head) (L.tail.map ⟨Prod.mk false, rfl⟩)
theorem addBottom_map (L : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))) :
(addBottom L).map ⟨Prod.snd, by rfl⟩ = L := by
simp only [addBottom, ListBlank.map_cons]
convert ListBlank.cons_head_tail L
generalize ListBlank.tail L = L'
refine L'.induction_on fun l ↦ ?_; simp
theorem addBottom_modifyNth (f : (∀ k, Option (Γ k)) → ∀ k, Option (Γ k))
(L : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))) (n : ℕ) :
(addBottom L).modifyNth (fun a ↦ (a.1, f a.2)) n = addBottom (L.modifyNth f n) := by
cases n <;>
simp only [addBottom, ListBlank.head_cons, ListBlank.modifyNth, ListBlank.tail_cons]
congr; symm; apply ListBlank.map_modifyNth; intro; rfl
theorem addBottom_nth_snd (L : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))) (n : ℕ) :
((addBottom L).nth n).2 = L.nth n := by
conv => rhs; rw [← addBottom_map L, ListBlank.nth_map]
theorem addBottom_nth_succ_fst (L : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))) (n : ℕ) :
((addBottom L).nth (n + 1)).1 = false := by
rw [ListBlank.nth_succ, addBottom, ListBlank.tail_cons, ListBlank.nth_map]
theorem addBottom_head_fst (L : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))) : (addBottom L).head.1 = true := by
rw [addBottom, ListBlank.head_cons]
variable (K Γ σ) in
/-- A stack action is a command that interacts with the top of a stack. Our default position
is at the bottom of all the stacks, so we have to hold on to this action while going to the end
to modify the stack. -/
inductive StAct (k : K)
| push : (σ → Γ k) → StAct k
| peek : (σ → Option (Γ k) → σ) → StAct k
| pop : (σ → Option (Γ k) → σ) → StAct k
instance StAct.inhabited {k : K} : Inhabited (StAct K Γ σ k) :=
⟨StAct.peek fun s _ ↦ s⟩
section
open StAct
/-- The TM2 statement corresponding to a stack action. -/
def stRun {k : K} : StAct K Γ σ k → TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ → TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ
| push f => TM2.Stmt.push k f
| peek f => TM2.Stmt.peek k f
| pop f => TM2.Stmt.pop k f
/-- The effect of a stack action on the local variables, given the value of the stack. -/
def stVar {k : K} (v : σ) (l : List (Γ k)) : StAct K Γ σ k → σ
| push _ => v
| peek f => f v l.head?
| pop f => f v l.head?
/-- The effect of a stack action on the stack. -/
def stWrite {k : K} (v : σ) (l : List (Γ k)) : StAct K Γ σ k → List (Γ k)
| push f => f v :: l
| peek _ => l
| pop _ => l.tail
/-- We have partitioned the TM2 statements into "stack actions", which require going to the end
of the stack, and all other actions, which do not. This is a modified recursor which lumps the
stack actions into one. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def stmtStRec.{l} {motive : TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ → Sort l}
(run : ∀ (k) (s : StAct K Γ σ k) (q) (_ : motive q), motive (stRun s q))
(load : ∀ (a q) (_ : motive q), motive (TM2.Stmt.load a q))
(branch : ∀ (p q₁ q₂) (_ : motive q₁) (_ : motive q₂), motive (TM2.Stmt.branch p q₁ q₂))
(goto : ∀ l, motive (TM2.Stmt.goto l)) (halt : motive TM2.Stmt.halt) : ∀ n, motive n
| TM2.Stmt.push _ f q => run _ (push f) _ (stmtStRec run load branch goto halt q)
| TM2.Stmt.peek _ f q => run _ (peek f) _ (stmtStRec run load branch goto halt q)
| TM2.Stmt.pop _ f q => run _ (pop f) _ (stmtStRec run load branch goto halt q)
| TM2.Stmt.load _ q => load _ _ (stmtStRec run load branch goto halt q)
| TM2.Stmt.branch _ q₁ q₂ =>
branch _ _ _ (stmtStRec run load branch goto halt q₁) (stmtStRec run load branch goto halt q₂)
| TM2.Stmt.goto _ => goto _
| TM2.Stmt.halt => halt
theorem supports_run (S : Finset Λ) {k : K} (s : StAct K Γ σ k) (q : TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ) :
TM2.SupportsStmt S (stRun s q) ↔ TM2.SupportsStmt S q := by
cases s <;> rfl
end
variable (K Γ Λ σ)
/-- The machine states of the TM2 emulator. We can either be in a normal state when waiting for the
next TM2 action, or we can be in the "go" and "return" states to go to the top of the stack and
return to the bottom, respectively. -/
inductive Λ'
| normal : Λ → Λ'
| go (k : K) : StAct K Γ σ k → TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ → Λ'
| ret : TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ → Λ'
variable {K Γ Λ σ}
open Λ'
instance Λ'.inhabited [Inhabited Λ] : Inhabited (Λ' K Γ Λ σ) :=
⟨normal default⟩
open TM1.Stmt
section
variable [DecidableEq K]
/-- The program corresponding to state transitions at the end of a stack. Here we start out just
after the top of the stack, and should end just after the new top of the stack. -/
def trStAct {k : K} (q : TM1.Stmt (Γ' K Γ) (Λ' K Γ Λ σ) σ) :
StAct K Γ σ k → TM1.Stmt (Γ' K Γ) (Λ' K Γ Λ σ) σ
| StAct.push f => (write fun a s ↦ (a.1, update a.2 k <| some <| f s)) <| move Dir.right q
| StAct.peek f => move Dir.left <| (load fun a s ↦ f s (a.2 k)) <| move Dir.right q
| StAct.pop f =>
branch (fun a _ ↦ a.1) (load (fun _ s ↦ f s none) q)
(move Dir.left <|
(load fun a s ↦ f s (a.2 k)) <| write (fun a _ ↦ (a.1, update a.2 k none)) q)
/-- The initial state for the TM2 emulator, given an initial TM2 state. All stacks start out empty
except for the input stack, and the stack bottom mark is set at the head. -/
def trInit (k : K) (L : List (Γ k)) : List (Γ' K Γ) :=
let L' : List (Γ' K Γ) := L.reverse.map fun a ↦ (false, update (fun _ ↦ none) k (some a))
(true, L'.headI.2) :: L'.tail
theorem step_run {k : K} (q : TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ) (v : σ) (S : ∀ k, List (Γ k)) : ∀ s : StAct K Γ σ k,
TM2.stepAux (stRun s q) v S = TM2.stepAux q (stVar v (S k) s) (update S k (stWrite v (S k) s))
| StAct.push _ => rfl
| StAct.peek f => by unfold stWrite; rw [Function.update_eq_self]; rfl
| StAct.pop _ => rfl
end
/-- The translation of TM2 statements to TM1 statements. regular actions have direct equivalents,
but stack actions are deferred by going to the corresponding `go` state, so that we can find the
appropriate stack top. -/
def trNormal : TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ → TM1.Stmt (Γ' K Γ) (Λ' K Γ Λ σ) σ
| TM2.Stmt.push k f q => goto fun _ _ ↦ go k (StAct.push f) q
| TM2.Stmt.peek k f q => goto fun _ _ ↦ go k (StAct.peek f) q
| TM2.Stmt.pop k f q => goto fun _ _ ↦ go k (StAct.pop f) q
| TM2.Stmt.load a q => load (fun _ ↦ a) (trNormal q)
| TM2.Stmt.branch f q₁ q₂ => branch (fun _ ↦ f) (trNormal q₁) (trNormal q₂)
| TM2.Stmt.goto l => goto fun _ s ↦ normal (l s)
| TM2.Stmt.halt => halt
theorem trNormal_run {k : K} (s : StAct K Γ σ k) (q : TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ) :
trNormal (stRun s q) = goto fun _ _ ↦ go k s q := by
cases s <;> rfl
section
open scoped Classical in
/-- The set of machine states accessible from an initial TM2 statement. -/
noncomputable def trStmts₁ : TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ → Finset (Λ' K Γ Λ σ)
| TM2.Stmt.push k f q => {go k (StAct.push f) q, ret q} ∪ trStmts₁ q
| TM2.Stmt.peek k f q => {go k (StAct.peek f) q, ret q} ∪ trStmts₁ q
| TM2.Stmt.pop k f q => {go k (StAct.pop f) q, ret q} ∪ trStmts₁ q
| TM2.Stmt.load _ q => trStmts₁ q
| TM2.Stmt.branch _ q₁ q₂ => trStmts₁ q₁ ∪ trStmts₁ q₂
| _ => ∅
theorem trStmts₁_run {k : K} {s : StAct K Γ σ k} {q : TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ} :
open scoped Classical in
trStmts₁ (stRun s q) = {go k s q, ret q} ∪ trStmts₁ q := by
cases s <;> simp only [trStmts₁, stRun]
theorem tr_respects_aux₂ [DecidableEq K] {k : K} {q : TM1.Stmt (Γ' K Γ) (Λ' K Γ Λ σ) σ} {v : σ}
{S : ∀ k, List (Γ k)} {L : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))}
(hL : ∀ k, L.map (proj k) = ListBlank.mk ((S k).map some).reverse) (o : StAct K Γ σ k) :
let v' := stVar v (S k) o
let Sk' := stWrite v (S k) o
let S' := update S k Sk'
∃ L' : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k)),
(∀ k, L'.map (proj k) = ListBlank.mk ((S' k).map some).reverse) ∧
TM1.stepAux (trStAct q o) v
((Tape.move Dir.right)^[(S k).length] (Tape.mk' ∅ (addBottom L))) =
TM1.stepAux q v' ((Tape.move Dir.right)^[(S' k).length] (Tape.mk' ∅ (addBottom L'))) := by
simp only [Function.update_self]; cases o with simp only [stWrite, stVar, trStAct, TM1.stepAux]
| push f =>
have := Tape.write_move_right_n fun a : Γ' K Γ ↦ (a.1, update a.2 k (some (f v)))
refine
⟨_, fun k' ↦ ?_, by
-- Porting note: `rw [...]` to `erw [...]; rfl`.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5164
rw [Tape.move_right_n_head, List.length, Tape.mk'_nth_nat, this]
erw [addBottom_modifyNth fun a ↦ update a k (some (f v))]
rw [Nat.add_one, iterate_succ']
rfl⟩
refine ListBlank.ext fun i ↦ ?_
rw [ListBlank.nth_map, ListBlank.nth_modifyNth, proj, PointedMap.mk_val]
by_cases h' : k' = k
· subst k'
split_ifs with h
<;> simp only [List.reverse_cons, Function.update_self, ListBlank.nth_mk, List.map]
· rw [List.getI_eq_getElem _, List.getElem_append_right] <;>
simp only [List.length_append, List.length_reverse, List.length_map, ← h,
Nat.sub_self, List.length_singleton, List.getElem_singleton,
le_refl, Nat.lt_succ_self]
rw [← proj_map_nth, hL, ListBlank.nth_mk]
rcases lt_or_gt_of_ne h with h | h
· rw [List.getI_append]
simpa only [List.length_map, List.length_reverse] using h
· rw [gt_iff_lt] at h
rw [List.getI_eq_default, List.getI_eq_default] <;>
simp only [Nat.add_one_le_iff, h, List.length, le_of_lt, List.length_reverse,
List.length_append, List.length_map]
· split_ifs <;> rw [Function.update_of_ne h', ← proj_map_nth, hL]
rw [Function.update_of_ne h']
| peek f =>
rw [Function.update_eq_self]
use L, hL; rw [Tape.move_left_right]; congr
cases e : S k; · rfl
rw [List.length_cons, iterate_succ', Function.comp, Tape.move_right_left,
Tape.move_right_n_head, Tape.mk'_nth_nat, addBottom_nth_snd, stk_nth_val _ (hL k), e,
List.reverse_cons, ← List.length_reverse, List.getElem?_concat_length]
rfl
| pop f =>
rcases e : S k with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp only [Tape.mk'_head, ListBlank.head_cons, Tape.move_left_mk', List.length,
Tape.write_mk', List.head?, iterate_zero_apply, List.tail_nil]
rw [← e, Function.update_eq_self]
exact ⟨L, hL, by rw [addBottom_head_fst, cond]⟩
· refine
⟨_, fun k' ↦ ?_, by
erw [List.length_cons, Tape.move_right_n_head, Tape.mk'_nth_nat, addBottom_nth_succ_fst,
cond_false, iterate_succ', Function.comp, Tape.move_right_left, Tape.move_right_n_head,
Tape.mk'_nth_nat, Tape.write_move_right_n fun a : Γ' K Γ ↦ (a.1, update a.2 k none),
addBottom_modifyNth fun a ↦ update a k none, addBottom_nth_snd,
stk_nth_val _ (hL k), e,
show (List.cons hd tl).reverse[tl.length]? = some hd by
rw [List.reverse_cons, ← List.length_reverse, List.getElem?_concat_length],
List.head?, List.tail]⟩
refine ListBlank.ext fun i ↦ ?_
rw [ListBlank.nth_map, ListBlank.nth_modifyNth, proj, PointedMap.mk_val]
by_cases h' : k' = k
· subst k'
split_ifs with h <;> simp only [Function.update_self, ListBlank.nth_mk, List.tail]
· rw [List.getI_eq_default]
· rfl
rw [h, List.length_reverse, List.length_map]
rw [← proj_map_nth, hL, ListBlank.nth_mk, e, List.map, List.reverse_cons]
rcases lt_or_gt_of_ne h with h | h
· rw [List.getI_append]
simpa only [List.length_map, List.length_reverse] using h
· rw [gt_iff_lt] at h
rw [List.getI_eq_default, List.getI_eq_default] <;>
simp only [Nat.add_one_le_iff, h, List.length, le_of_lt, List.length_reverse,
List.length_append, List.length_map]
· split_ifs <;> rw [Function.update_of_ne h', ← proj_map_nth, hL]
rw [Function.update_of_ne h']
end
variable [DecidableEq K]
variable (M : Λ → TM2.Stmt Γ Λ σ)
/-- The TM2 emulator machine states written as a TM1 program.
This handles the `go` and `ret` states, which shuttle to and from a stack top. -/
def tr : Λ' K Γ Λ σ → TM1.Stmt (Γ' K Γ) (Λ' K Γ Λ σ) σ
| normal q => trNormal (M q)
| go k s q =>
branch (fun a _ ↦ (a.2 k).isNone) (trStAct (goto fun _ _ ↦ ret q) s)
(move Dir.right <| goto fun _ _ ↦ go k s q)
| ret q => branch (fun a _ ↦ a.1) (trNormal q) (move Dir.left <| goto fun _ _ ↦ ret q)
/-- The relation between TM2 configurations and TM1 configurations of the TM2 emulator. -/
inductive TrCfg : TM2.Cfg Γ Λ σ → TM1.Cfg (Γ' K Γ) (Λ' K Γ Λ σ) σ → Prop
| mk {q : Option Λ} {v : σ} {S : ∀ k, List (Γ k)} (L : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))) :
(∀ k, L.map (proj k) = ListBlank.mk ((S k).map some).reverse) →
TrCfg ⟨q, v, S⟩ ⟨q.map normal, v, Tape.mk' ∅ (addBottom L)⟩
theorem tr_respects_aux₁ {k} (o q v) {S : List (Γ k)} {L : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))}
(hL : L.map (proj k) = ListBlank.mk (S.map some).reverse) (n) (H : n ≤ S.length) :
Reaches₀ (TM1.step (tr M)) ⟨some (go k o q), v, Tape.mk' ∅ (addBottom L)⟩
⟨some (go k o q), v, (Tape.move Dir.right)^[n] (Tape.mk' ∅ (addBottom L))⟩ := by
induction' n with n IH; · rfl
apply (IH (le_of_lt H)).tail
rw [iterate_succ_apply']
simp only [TM1.step, TM1.stepAux, tr, Tape.mk'_nth_nat, Tape.move_right_n_head,
addBottom_nth_snd, Option.mem_def]
rw [stk_nth_val _ hL, List.getElem?_eq_getElem]
· rfl
· rwa [List.length_reverse]
theorem tr_respects_aux₃ {q v} {L : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))} (n) : Reaches₀ (TM1.step (tr M))
⟨some (ret q), v, (Tape.move Dir.right)^[n] (Tape.mk' ∅ (addBottom L))⟩
⟨some (ret q), v, Tape.mk' ∅ (addBottom L)⟩ := by
induction' n with n IH; · rfl
refine Reaches₀.head ?_ IH
simp only [Option.mem_def, TM1.step]
rw [Option.some_inj, tr, TM1.stepAux, Tape.move_right_n_head, Tape.mk'_nth_nat,
addBottom_nth_succ_fst, TM1.stepAux, iterate_succ', Function.comp_apply, Tape.move_right_left]
rfl
theorem tr_respects_aux {q v T k} {S : ∀ k, List (Γ k)}
(hT : ∀ k, ListBlank.map (proj k) T = ListBlank.mk ((S k).map some).reverse)
(o : StAct K Γ σ k)
(IH : ∀ {v : σ} {S : ∀ k : K, List (Γ k)} {T : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))},
(∀ k, ListBlank.map (proj k) T = ListBlank.mk ((S k).map some).reverse) →
∃ b, TrCfg (TM2.stepAux q v S) b ∧
Reaches (TM1.step (tr M)) (TM1.stepAux (trNormal q) v (Tape.mk' ∅ (addBottom T))) b) :
∃ b, TrCfg (TM2.stepAux (stRun o q) v S) b ∧ Reaches (TM1.step (tr M))
(TM1.stepAux (trNormal (stRun o q)) v (Tape.mk' ∅ (addBottom T))) b := by
simp only [trNormal_run, step_run]
have hgo := tr_respects_aux₁ M o q v (hT k) _ le_rfl
obtain ⟨T', hT', hrun⟩ := tr_respects_aux₂ (Λ := Λ) hT o
have := hgo.tail' rfl
rw [tr, TM1.stepAux, Tape.move_right_n_head, Tape.mk'_nth_nat, addBottom_nth_snd,
stk_nth_val _ (hT k), List.getElem?_eq_none (le_of_eq List.length_reverse),
Option.isNone, cond, hrun, TM1.stepAux] at this
obtain ⟨c, gc, rc⟩ := IH hT'
refine ⟨c, gc, (this.to₀.trans (tr_respects_aux₃ M _) c (TransGen.head' rfl ?_)).to_reflTransGen⟩
rw [tr, TM1.stepAux, Tape.mk'_head, addBottom_head_fst]
exact rc
attribute [local simp] Respects TM2.step TM2.stepAux trNormal
theorem tr_respects : Respects (TM2.step M) (TM1.step (tr M)) TrCfg := by
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129): additional beta reduction needed
intro c₁ c₂ h
obtain @⟨- | l, v, S, L, hT⟩ := h; · constructor
rsuffices ⟨b, c, r⟩ : ∃ b, _ ∧ Reaches (TM1.step (tr M)) _ _
· exact ⟨b, c, TransGen.head' rfl r⟩
simp only [tr]
generalize M l = N
induction N using stmtStRec generalizing v S L hT with
| run k s q IH => exact tr_respects_aux M hT s @IH
| load a _ IH => exact IH _ hT
| branch p q₁ q₂ IH₁ IH₂ =>
unfold TM2.stepAux trNormal TM1.stepAux
beta_reduce
cases p v <;> [exact IH₂ _ hT; exact IH₁ _ hT]
| goto => exact ⟨_, ⟨_, hT⟩, ReflTransGen.refl⟩
| halt => exact ⟨_, ⟨_, hT⟩, ReflTransGen.refl⟩
section
variable [Inhabited Λ] [Inhabited σ]
theorem trCfg_init (k) (L : List (Γ k)) : TrCfg (TM2.init k L)
(TM1.init (trInit k L) : TM1.Cfg (Γ' K Γ) (Λ' K Γ Λ σ) σ) := by
rw [(_ : TM1.init _ = _)]
· refine ⟨ListBlank.mk (L.reverse.map fun a ↦ update default k (some a)), fun k' ↦ ?_⟩
refine ListBlank.ext fun i ↦ ?_
rw [ListBlank.map_mk, ListBlank.nth_mk, List.getI_eq_iget_getElem?, List.map_map]
have : ((proj k').f ∘ fun a => update (β := fun k => Option (Γ k)) default k (some a))
= fun a => (proj k').f (update (β := fun k => Option (Γ k)) default k (some a)) := rfl
rw [this, List.getElem?_map, proj, PointedMap.mk_val]
simp only []
by_cases h : k' = k
· subst k'
simp only [Function.update_self]
rw [ListBlank.nth_mk, List.getI_eq_iget_getElem?, ← List.map_reverse, List.getElem?_map]
· simp only [Function.update_of_ne h]
rw [ListBlank.nth_mk, List.getI_eq_iget_getElem?, List.map, List.reverse_nil]
cases L.reverse[i]? <;> rfl
· rw [trInit, TM1.init]
congr <;> cases L.reverse <;> try rfl
simp only [List.map_map, List.tail_cons, List.map]
rfl
theorem tr_eval_dom (k) (L : List (Γ k)) :
(TM1.eval (tr M) (trInit k L)).Dom ↔ (TM2.eval M k L).Dom :=
Turing.tr_eval_dom (tr_respects M) (trCfg_init k L)
theorem tr_eval (k) (L : List (Γ k)) {L₁ L₂} (H₁ : L₁ ∈ TM1.eval (tr M) (trInit k L))
(H₂ : L₂ ∈ TM2.eval M k L) :
∃ (S : ∀ k, List (Γ k)) (L' : ListBlank (∀ k, Option (Γ k))),
addBottom L' = L₁ ∧
(∀ k, L'.map (proj k) = ListBlank.mk ((S k).map some).reverse) ∧ S k = L₂ := by
obtain ⟨c₁, h₁, rfl⟩ := (Part.mem_map_iff _).1 H₁
obtain ⟨c₂, h₂, rfl⟩ := (Part.mem_map_iff _).1 H₂
obtain ⟨_, ⟨L', hT⟩, h₃⟩ := Turing.tr_eval (tr_respects M) (trCfg_init k L) h₂
cases Part.mem_unique h₁ h₃
exact ⟨_, L', by simp only [Tape.mk'_right₀], hT, rfl⟩
end
section
variable [Inhabited Λ]
open scoped Classical in
/-- The support of a set of TM2 states in the TM2 emulator. -/
noncomputable def trSupp (S : Finset Λ) : Finset (Λ' K Γ Λ σ) :=
S.biUnion fun l ↦ insert (normal l) (trStmts₁ (M l))
open scoped Classical in
theorem tr_supports {S} (ss : TM2.Supports M S) : TM1.Supports (tr M) (trSupp M S) :=
⟨Finset.mem_biUnion.2 ⟨_, ss.1, Finset.mem_insert.2 <| Or.inl rfl⟩, fun l' h ↦ by
suffices ∀ (q) (_ : TM2.SupportsStmt S q) (_ : ∀ x ∈ trStmts₁ q, x ∈ trSupp M S),
TM1.SupportsStmt (trSupp M S) (trNormal q) ∧
∀ l' ∈ trStmts₁ q, TM1.SupportsStmt (trSupp M S) (tr M l') by
rcases Finset.mem_biUnion.1 h with ⟨l, lS, h⟩
have :=
this _ (ss.2 l lS) fun x hx ↦ Finset.mem_biUnion.2 ⟨_, lS, Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hx⟩
rcases Finset.mem_insert.1 h with (rfl | h) <;> [exact this.1; exact this.2 _ h]
clear h l'
refine stmtStRec ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· intro _ s _ IH ss' sub -- stack op
rw [TM2to1.supports_run] at ss'
simp only [TM2to1.trStmts₁_run, Finset.mem_union, Finset.mem_insert, Finset.mem_singleton]
at sub
have hgo := sub _ (Or.inl <| Or.inl rfl)
have hret := sub _ (Or.inl <| Or.inr rfl)
obtain ⟨IH₁, IH₂⟩ := IH ss' fun x hx ↦ sub x <| Or.inr hx
refine ⟨by simp only [trNormal_run, TM1.SupportsStmt]; intros; exact hgo, fun l h ↦ ?_⟩
rw [trStmts₁_run] at h
simp only [TM2to1.trStmts₁_run, Finset.mem_union, Finset.mem_insert, Finset.mem_singleton]
at h
rcases h with (⟨rfl | rfl⟩ | h)
· cases s
· exact ⟨fun _ _ ↦ hret, fun _ _ ↦ hgo⟩
· exact ⟨fun _ _ ↦ hret, fun _ _ ↦ hgo⟩
· exact ⟨⟨fun _ _ ↦ hret, fun _ _ ↦ hret⟩, fun _ _ ↦ hgo⟩
· unfold TM1.SupportsStmt TM2to1.tr
exact ⟨IH₁, fun _ _ ↦ hret⟩
· exact IH₂ _ h
· intro _ _ IH ss' sub -- load
unfold TM2to1.trStmts₁ at sub ⊢
exact IH ss' sub
· intro _ _ _ IH₁ IH₂ ss' sub -- branch
unfold TM2to1.trStmts₁ at sub
obtain ⟨IH₁₁, IH₁₂⟩ := IH₁ ss'.1 fun x hx ↦ sub x <| Finset.mem_union_left _ hx
obtain ⟨IH₂₁, IH₂₂⟩ := IH₂ ss'.2 fun x hx ↦ sub x <| Finset.mem_union_right _ hx
refine ⟨⟨IH₁₁, IH₂₁⟩, fun l h ↦ ?_⟩
rw [trStmts₁] at h
rcases Finset.mem_union.1 h with (h | h) <;> [exact IH₁₂ _ h; exact IH₂₂ _ h]
· intro _ ss' _ -- goto
simp only [trStmts₁, Finset.not_mem_empty]; refine ⟨?_, fun _ ↦ False.elim⟩
exact fun _ v ↦ Finset.mem_biUnion.2 ⟨_, ss' v, Finset.mem_insert_self _ _⟩
· intro _ _ -- halt
simp only [trStmts₁, Finset.not_mem_empty]
exact ⟨trivial, fun _ ↦ False.elim⟩⟩
end
end TM2to1
end Turing
| Mathlib/Computability/TuringMachine.lean | 988 | 997 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Equiv
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.NonUnitalHom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.MapDomain
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.SMul
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp.SumProd
/-!
# Monoid algebras
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset
open Finsupp hiding single mapDomain
universe u₁ u₂ u₃ u₄
variable (k : Type u₁) (G : Type u₂) (H : Type*) {R : Type*}
/-! ### Multiplicative monoids -/
namespace MonoidAlgebra
variable {k G}
/-! #### Non-unital, non-associative algebra structure -/
section NonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra
variable (k) [Semiring k] [DistribSMul R k] [Mul G]
variable {A : Type u₃} [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A]
/-- A non_unital `k`-algebra homomorphism from `MonoidAlgebra k G` is uniquely defined by its
values on the functions `single a 1`. -/
theorem nonUnitalAlgHom_ext [DistribMulAction k A] {φ₁ φ₂ : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₙₐ[k] A}
(h : ∀ x, φ₁ (single x 1) = φ₂ (single x 1)) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
NonUnitalAlgHom.to_distribMulActionHom_injective <|
Finsupp.distribMulActionHom_ext' fun a => DistribMulActionHom.ext_ring (h a)
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext high]
theorem nonUnitalAlgHom_ext' [DistribMulAction k A] {φ₁ φ₂ : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₙₐ[k] A}
(h : φ₁.toMulHom.comp (ofMagma k G) = φ₂.toMulHom.comp (ofMagma k G)) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
nonUnitalAlgHom_ext k <| DFunLike.congr_fun h
/-- The functor `G ↦ MonoidAlgebra k G`, from the category of magmas to the category of non-unital,
non-associative algebras over `k` is adjoint to the forgetful functor in the other direction. -/
@[simps apply_apply symm_apply]
def liftMagma [Module k A] [IsScalarTower k A A] [SMulCommClass k A A] :
(G →ₙ* A) ≃ (MonoidAlgebra k G →ₙₐ[k] A) where
toFun f :=
{ liftAddHom fun x => (smulAddHom k A).flip (f x) with
toFun := fun a => a.sum fun m t => t • f m
map_smul' := fun t' a => by
rw [Finsupp.smul_sum, sum_smul_index']
· simp_rw [smul_assoc, MonoidHom.id_apply]
· intro m
exact zero_smul k (f m)
map_mul' := fun a₁ a₂ => by
let g : G → k → A := fun m t => t • f m
have h₁ : ∀ m, g m 0 = 0 := by
intro m
exact zero_smul k (f m)
have h₂ : ∀ (m) (t₁ t₂ : k), g m (t₁ + t₂) = g m t₁ + g m t₂ := by
intros
rw [← add_smul]
-- Porting note: `reducible` cannot be `local` so proof gets long.
simp_rw [Finsupp.mul_sum, Finsupp.sum_mul, smul_mul_smul_comm, ← f.map_mul, mul_def,
sum_comm a₂ a₁]
rw [sum_sum_index h₁ h₂]; congr; ext
rw [sum_sum_index h₁ h₂]; congr; ext
rw [sum_single_index (h₁ _)] }
invFun F := F.toMulHom.comp (ofMagma k G)
left_inv f := by
ext m
simp only [NonUnitalAlgHom.coe_mk, ofMagma_apply, NonUnitalAlgHom.toMulHom_eq_coe,
sum_single_index, Function.comp_apply, one_smul, zero_smul, MulHom.coe_comp,
NonUnitalAlgHom.coe_to_mulHom]
right_inv F := by
ext m
simp only [NonUnitalAlgHom.coe_mk, ofMagma_apply, NonUnitalAlgHom.toMulHom_eq_coe,
sum_single_index, Function.comp_apply, one_smul, zero_smul, MulHom.coe_comp,
NonUnitalAlgHom.coe_to_mulHom]
end NonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra
/-! #### Algebra structure -/
section Algebra
/-- The instance `Algebra k (MonoidAlgebra A G)` whenever we have `Algebra k A`.
In particular this provides the instance `Algebra k (MonoidAlgebra k G)`.
-/
instance algebra {A : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [Monoid G] :
Algebra k (MonoidAlgebra A G) where
algebraMap := singleOneRingHom.comp (algebraMap k A)
smul_def' := fun r a => by
ext
rw [Finsupp.coe_smul]
simp [single_one_mul_apply, Algebra.smul_def, Pi.smul_apply]
commutes' := fun r f => by
refine Finsupp.ext fun _ => ?_
simp [single_one_mul_apply, mul_single_one_apply, Algebra.commutes]
/-- `Finsupp.single 1` as an `AlgHom` -/
@[simps! apply]
def singleOneAlgHom {A : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [Monoid G] :
A →ₐ[k] MonoidAlgebra A G :=
{ singleOneRingHom with
commutes' := fun r => by
ext
simp
rfl }
@[simp]
theorem coe_algebraMap {A : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [Monoid G] :
⇑(algebraMap k (MonoidAlgebra A G)) = single 1 ∘ algebraMap k A :=
rfl
theorem single_eq_algebraMap_mul_of [CommSemiring k] [Monoid G] (a : G) (b : k) :
single a b = algebraMap k (MonoidAlgebra k G) b * of k G a := by simp
theorem single_algebraMap_eq_algebraMap_mul_of {A : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A]
[Algebra k A] [Monoid G] (a : G) (b : k) :
single a (algebraMap k A b) = algebraMap k (MonoidAlgebra A G) b * of A G a := by simp
instance isLocalHom_singleOneAlgHom
{A : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [Monoid G] :
IsLocalHom (singleOneAlgHom : A →ₐ[k] MonoidAlgebra A G) where
map_nonunit := isLocalHom_singleOneRingHom.map_nonunit
instance isLocalHom_algebraMap
{A : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [Monoid G]
[IsLocalHom (algebraMap k A)] :
IsLocalHom (algebraMap k (MonoidAlgebra A G)) where
map_nonunit _ hx := .of_map _ _ <| isLocalHom_singleOneAlgHom (k := k).map_nonunit _ hx
end Algebra
section lift
variable [CommSemiring k] [Monoid G] [Monoid H]
variable {A : Type u₃} [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] {B : Type*} [Semiring B] [Algebra k B]
/-- `liftNCRingHom` as an `AlgHom`, for when `f` is an `AlgHom` -/
def liftNCAlgHom (f : A →ₐ[k] B) (g : G →* B) (h_comm : ∀ x y, Commute (f x) (g y)) :
MonoidAlgebra A G →ₐ[k] B :=
{ liftNCRingHom (f : A →+* B) g h_comm with
commutes' := by simp [liftNCRingHom] }
/-- A `k`-algebra homomorphism from `MonoidAlgebra k G` is uniquely defined by its
values on the functions `single a 1`. -/
theorem algHom_ext ⦃φ₁ φ₂ : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A⦄
(h : ∀ x, φ₁ (single x 1) = φ₂ (single x 1)) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
AlgHom.toLinearMap_injective <| Finsupp.lhom_ext' fun a => LinearMap.ext_ring (h a)
-- The priority must be `high`.
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext high]
theorem algHom_ext' ⦃φ₁ φ₂ : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A⦄
(h :
(φ₁ : MonoidAlgebra k G →* A).comp (of k G) = (φ₂ : MonoidAlgebra k G →* A).comp (of k G)) :
φ₁ = φ₂ :=
algHom_ext <| DFunLike.congr_fun h
variable (k G A)
/-- Any monoid homomorphism `G →* A` can be lifted to an algebra homomorphism
`MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A`. -/
def lift : (G →* A) ≃ (MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A) where
invFun f := (f : MonoidAlgebra k G →* A).comp (of k G)
toFun F := liftNCAlgHom (Algebra.ofId k A) F fun _ _ => Algebra.commutes _ _
left_inv f := by
ext
simp [liftNCAlgHom, liftNCRingHom]
right_inv F := by
ext
simp [liftNCAlgHom, liftNCRingHom]
variable {k G H A}
theorem lift_apply' (F : G →* A) (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
lift k G A F f = f.sum fun a b => algebraMap k A b * F a :=
rfl
theorem lift_apply (F : G →* A) (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
lift k G A F f = f.sum fun a b => b • F a := by simp only [lift_apply', Algebra.smul_def]
theorem lift_def (F : G →* A) : ⇑(lift k G A F) = liftNC ((algebraMap k A : k →+* A) : k →+ A) F :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_symm_apply (F : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A) (x : G) :
(lift k G A).symm F x = F (single x 1) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_single (F : G →* A) (a b) : lift k G A F (single a b) = b • F a := by
rw [lift_def, liftNC_single, Algebra.smul_def, AddMonoidHom.coe_coe]
theorem lift_of (F : G →* A) (x) : lift k G A F (of k G x) = F x := by simp
theorem lift_unique' (F : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A) :
F = lift k G A ((F : MonoidAlgebra k G →* A).comp (of k G)) :=
((lift k G A).apply_symm_apply F).symm
/-- Decomposition of a `k`-algebra homomorphism from `MonoidAlgebra k G` by
its values on `F (single a 1)`. -/
theorem lift_unique (F : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] A) (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
F f = f.sum fun a b => b • F (single a 1) := by
conv_lhs =>
rw [lift_unique' F]
simp [lift_apply]
/-- If `f : G → H` is a homomorphism between two magmas, then
`Finsupp.mapDomain f` is a non-unital algebra homomorphism between their magma algebras. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapDomainNonUnitalAlgHom (k A : Type*) [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A]
{G H F : Type*} [Mul G] [Mul H] [FunLike F G H] [MulHomClass F G H] (f : F) :
MonoidAlgebra A G →ₙₐ[k] MonoidAlgebra A H :=
{ (Finsupp.mapDomain.addMonoidHom f : MonoidAlgebra A G →+ MonoidAlgebra A H) with
map_mul' := fun x y => mapDomain_mul f x y
map_smul' := fun r x => mapDomain_smul r x }
variable (A) in
theorem mapDomain_algebraMap {F : Type*} [FunLike F G H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) (r : k) :
mapDomain f (algebraMap k (MonoidAlgebra A G) r) = algebraMap k (MonoidAlgebra A H) r := by
simp only [coe_algebraMap, mapDomain_single, map_one, (· ∘ ·)]
/-- If `f : G → H` is a multiplicative homomorphism between two monoids, then
`Finsupp.mapDomain f` is an algebra homomorphism between their monoid algebras. -/
@[simps!]
def mapDomainAlgHom (k A : Type*) [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] {H F : Type*}
[Monoid H] [FunLike F G H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) :
MonoidAlgebra A G →ₐ[k] MonoidAlgebra A H :=
{ mapDomainRingHom A f with commutes' := mapDomain_algebraMap A f }
@[simp]
lemma mapDomainAlgHom_id (k A) [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] :
mapDomainAlgHom k A (MonoidHom.id G) = AlgHom.id k (MonoidAlgebra A G) := by
ext; simp [MonoidHom.id, ← Function.id_def]
@[simp]
lemma mapDomainAlgHom_comp (k A) {G₁ G₂ G₃} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A]
[Monoid G₁] [Monoid G₂] [Monoid G₃] (f : G₁ →* G₂) (g : G₂ →* G₃) :
mapDomainAlgHom k A (g.comp f) = (mapDomainAlgHom k A g).comp (mapDomainAlgHom k A f) := by
ext; simp [mapDomain_comp]
variable (k A)
/-- If `e : G ≃* H` is a multiplicative equivalence between two monoids, then
`MonoidAlgebra.domCongr e` is an algebra equivalence between their monoid algebras. -/
def domCongr (e : G ≃* H) : MonoidAlgebra A G ≃ₐ[k] MonoidAlgebra A H :=
AlgEquiv.ofLinearEquiv
(Finsupp.domLCongr e : (G →₀ A) ≃ₗ[k] (H →₀ A))
((equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).trans <| mapDomain_one e)
(fun f g => (equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).trans <| (mapDomain_mul e f g).trans <|
congr_arg₂ _ (equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).symm (equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).symm)
theorem domCongr_toAlgHom (e : G ≃* H) : (domCongr k A e).toAlgHom = mapDomainAlgHom k A e :=
AlgHom.ext fun _ => equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _
@[simp] theorem domCongr_apply (e : G ≃* H) (f : MonoidAlgebra A G) (h : H) :
domCongr k A e f h = f (e.symm h) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem domCongr_support (e : G ≃* H) (f : MonoidAlgebra A G) :
(domCongr k A e f).support = f.support.map e :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem domCongr_single (e : G ≃* H) (g : G) (a : A) :
domCongr k A e (single g a) = single (e g) a :=
Finsupp.equivMapDomain_single _ _ _
@[simp] theorem domCongr_refl : domCongr k A (MulEquiv.refl G) = AlgEquiv.refl :=
AlgEquiv.ext fun _ => Finsupp.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp] theorem domCongr_symm (e : G ≃* H) : (domCongr k A e).symm = domCongr k A e.symm := rfl
end lift
section
variable (k)
/-- When `V` is a `k[G]`-module, multiplication by a group element `g` is a `k`-linear map. -/
def GroupSMul.linearMap [Monoid G] [CommSemiring k] (V : Type u₃) [AddCommMonoid V] [Module k V]
[Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) V] [IsScalarTower k (MonoidAlgebra k G) V] (g : G) : V →ₗ[k] V where
toFun v := single g (1 : k) • v
map_add' x y := smul_add (single g (1 : k)) x y
map_smul' _c _x := smul_algebra_smul_comm _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem GroupSMul.linearMap_apply [Monoid G] [CommSemiring k] (V : Type u₃) [AddCommMonoid V]
[Module k V] [Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) V] [IsScalarTower k (MonoidAlgebra k G) V] (g : G)
(v : V) : (GroupSMul.linearMap k V g) v = single g (1 : k) • v :=
rfl
section
variable {k}
variable [Monoid G] [CommSemiring k] {V : Type u₃} {W : Type u₄} [AddCommMonoid V] [Module k V]
[Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) V] [IsScalarTower k (MonoidAlgebra k G) V] [AddCommMonoid W]
[Module k W] [Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) W] [IsScalarTower k (MonoidAlgebra k G) W]
(f : V →ₗ[k] W)
/-- Build a `k[G]`-linear map from a `k`-linear map and evidence that it is `G`-equivariant. -/
def equivariantOfLinearOfComm
(h : ∀ (g : G) (v : V), f (single g (1 : k) • v) = single g (1 : k) • f v) :
V →ₗ[MonoidAlgebra k G] W where
toFun := f
map_add' v v' := by simp
map_smul' c v := by
refine Finsupp.induction c ?_ ?_
· simp
· intro g r c' _nm _nz w
dsimp at *
simp only [add_smul, f.map_add, w, add_left_inj, single_eq_algebraMap_mul_of, ← smul_smul]
rw [algebraMap_smul (MonoidAlgebra k G) r, algebraMap_smul (MonoidAlgebra k G) r, f.map_smul,
of_apply, h g v]
variable (h : ∀ (g : G) (v : V), f (single g (1 : k) • v) = single g (1 : k) • f v)
@[simp]
theorem equivariantOfLinearOfComm_apply (v : V) : (equivariantOfLinearOfComm f h) v = f v :=
rfl
end
end
end MonoidAlgebra
namespace AddMonoidAlgebra
variable {k G H}
/-! #### Non-unital, non-associative algebra structure -/
section NonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra
variable (k) [Semiring k] [DistribSMul R k] [Add G]
variable {A : Type u₃} [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A]
/-- A non_unital `k`-algebra homomorphism from `k[G]` is uniquely defined by its
values on the functions `single a 1`. -/
theorem nonUnitalAlgHom_ext [DistribMulAction k A] {φ₁ φ₂ : k[G] →ₙₐ[k] A}
(h : ∀ x, φ₁ (single x 1) = φ₂ (single x 1)) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
@MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalAlgHom_ext k (Multiplicative G) _ _ _ _ _ φ₁ φ₂ h
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext high]
theorem nonUnitalAlgHom_ext' [DistribMulAction k A] {φ₁ φ₂ : k[G] →ₙₐ[k] A}
(h : φ₁.toMulHom.comp (ofMagma k G) = φ₂.toMulHom.comp (ofMagma k G)) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
@MonoidAlgebra.nonUnitalAlgHom_ext' k (Multiplicative G) _ _ _ _ _ φ₁ φ₂ h
/-- The functor `G ↦ k[G]`, from the category of magmas to the category of
non-unital, non-associative algebras over `k` is adjoint to the forgetful functor in the other
direction. -/
@[simps apply_apply symm_apply]
def liftMagma [Module k A] [IsScalarTower k A A] [SMulCommClass k A A] :
(Multiplicative G →ₙ* A) ≃ (k[G] →ₙₐ[k] A) :=
{ (MonoidAlgebra.liftMagma k : (Multiplicative G →ₙ* A) ≃ (_ →ₙₐ[k] A)) with
toFun := fun f =>
{ (MonoidAlgebra.liftMagma k f :) with
toFun := fun a => sum a fun m t => t • f (Multiplicative.ofAdd m) }
invFun := fun F => F.toMulHom.comp (ofMagma k G) }
end NonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra
/-! #### Algebra structure -/
section Algebra
/-- The instance `Algebra R k[G]` whenever we have `Algebra R k`.
In particular this provides the instance `Algebra k k[G]`.
-/
instance algebra [CommSemiring R] [Semiring k] [Algebra R k] [AddMonoid G] :
Algebra R k[G] where
algebraMap := singleZeroRingHom.comp (algebraMap R k)
smul_def' := fun r a => by
ext
rw [Finsupp.coe_smul]
simp [single_zero_mul_apply, Algebra.smul_def, Pi.smul_apply]
commutes' := fun r f => by
refine Finsupp.ext fun _ => ?_
simp [single_zero_mul_apply, mul_single_zero_apply, Algebra.commutes]
/-- `Finsupp.single 0` as an `AlgHom` -/
@[simps! apply]
def singleZeroAlgHom [CommSemiring R] [Semiring k] [Algebra R k] [AddMonoid G] : k →ₐ[R] k[G] :=
{ singleZeroRingHom with
commutes' := fun r => by
ext
simp
rfl }
@[simp]
theorem coe_algebraMap [CommSemiring R] [Semiring k] [Algebra R k] [AddMonoid G] :
(algebraMap R k[G] : R → k[G]) = single 0 ∘ algebraMap R k :=
rfl
instance isLocalHom_singleZeroAlgHom [CommSemiring R] [Semiring k] [Algebra R k] [AddMonoid G] :
IsLocalHom (singleZeroAlgHom : k →ₐ[R] k[G]) where
map_nonunit := isLocalHom_singleZeroRingHom.map_nonunit
instance isLocalHom_algebraMap [CommSemiring R] [Semiring k] [Algebra R k] [AddMonoid G]
[IsLocalHom (algebraMap R k)] :
IsLocalHom (algebraMap R k[G]) where
map_nonunit _ hx := .of_map _ _ <| isLocalHom_singleZeroAlgHom (R := R).map_nonunit _ hx
end Algebra
section lift
variable [CommSemiring k] [AddMonoid G]
variable {A : Type u₃} [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] {B : Type*} [Semiring B] [Algebra k B]
/-- `liftNCRingHom` as an `AlgHom`, for when `f` is an `AlgHom` -/
def liftNCAlgHom (f : A →ₐ[k] B) (g : Multiplicative G →* B) (h_comm : ∀ x y, Commute (f x) (g y)) :
A[G] →ₐ[k] B :=
{ liftNCRingHom (f : A →+* B) g h_comm with
commutes' := by simp [liftNCRingHom] }
/-- A `k`-algebra homomorphism from `k[G]` is uniquely defined by its
values on the functions `single a 1`. -/
theorem algHom_ext ⦃φ₁ φ₂ : k[G] →ₐ[k] A⦄
(h : ∀ x, φ₁ (single x 1) = φ₂ (single x 1)) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
@MonoidAlgebra.algHom_ext k (Multiplicative G) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ h
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext high]
theorem algHom_ext' ⦃φ₁ φ₂ : k[G] →ₐ[k] A⦄
(h : (φ₁ : k[G] →* A).comp (of k G) = (φ₂ : k[G] →* A).comp (of k G)) :
φ₁ = φ₂ :=
algHom_ext <| DFunLike.congr_fun h
variable (k G A)
/-- Any monoid homomorphism `G →* A` can be lifted to an algebra homomorphism
`k[G] →ₐ[k] A`. -/
def lift : (Multiplicative G →* A) ≃ (k[G] →ₐ[k] A) :=
{ @MonoidAlgebra.lift k (Multiplicative G) _ _ A _ _ with
invFun := fun f => (f : k[G] →* A).comp (of k G)
toFun := fun F =>
{ @MonoidAlgebra.lift k (Multiplicative G) _ _ A _ _ F with
toFun := liftNCAlgHom (Algebra.ofId k A) F fun _ _ => Algebra.commutes _ _ } }
variable {k G A}
theorem lift_apply' (F : Multiplicative G →* A) (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
lift k G A F f = f.sum fun a b => algebraMap k A b * F (Multiplicative.ofAdd a) :=
rfl
theorem lift_apply (F : Multiplicative G →* A) (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
lift k G A F f = f.sum fun a b => b • F (Multiplicative.ofAdd a) := by
simp only [lift_apply', Algebra.smul_def]
theorem lift_def (F : Multiplicative G →* A) :
⇑(lift k G A F) = liftNC ((algebraMap k A : k →+* A) : k →+ A) F :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_symm_apply (F : k[G] →ₐ[k] A) (x : Multiplicative G) :
(lift k G A).symm F x = F (single x.toAdd 1) :=
rfl
theorem lift_of (F : Multiplicative G →* A) (x : Multiplicative G) :
lift k G A F (of k G x) = F x := MonoidAlgebra.lift_of F x
@[simp]
theorem lift_single (F : Multiplicative G →* A) (a b) :
lift k G A F (single a b) = b • F (Multiplicative.ofAdd a) :=
MonoidAlgebra.lift_single F (.ofAdd a) b
lemma lift_of' (F : Multiplicative G →* A) (x : G) :
lift k G A F (of' k G x) = F (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) :=
lift_of F x
theorem lift_unique' (F : k[G] →ₐ[k] A) :
F = lift k G A ((F : k[G] →* A).comp (of k G)) :=
((lift k G A).apply_symm_apply F).symm
/-- Decomposition of a `k`-algebra homomorphism from `MonoidAlgebra k G` by
its values on `F (single a 1)`. -/
theorem lift_unique (F : k[G] →ₐ[k] A) (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
F f = f.sum fun a b => b • F (single a 1) := by
conv_lhs =>
rw [lift_unique' F]
simp [lift_apply]
theorem algHom_ext_iff {φ₁ φ₂ : k[G] →ₐ[k] A} :
(∀ x, φ₁ (Finsupp.single x 1) = φ₂ (Finsupp.single x 1)) ↔ φ₁ = φ₂ :=
⟨fun h => algHom_ext h, by rintro rfl _; rfl⟩
end lift
theorem mapDomain_algebraMap (A : Type*) {H F : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A]
[AddMonoid G] [AddMonoid H] [FunLike F G H] [AddMonoidHomClass F G H]
(f : F) (r : k) :
mapDomain f (algebraMap k A[G] r) = algebraMap k A[H] r := by
simp only [Function.comp_apply, mapDomain_single, AddMonoidAlgebra.coe_algebraMap, map_zero]
/-- If `f : G → H` is a homomorphism between two additive magmas, then `Finsupp.mapDomain f` is a
non-unital algebra homomorphism between their additive magma algebras. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapDomainNonUnitalAlgHom (k A : Type*) [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A]
{G H F : Type*} [Add G] [Add H] [FunLike F G H] [AddHomClass F G H] (f : F) :
A[G] →ₙₐ[k] A[H] :=
{ (Finsupp.mapDomain.addMonoidHom f : MonoidAlgebra A G →+ MonoidAlgebra A H) with
map_mul' := fun x y => mapDomain_mul f x y
map_smul' := fun r x => mapDomain_smul r x }
/-- If `f : G → H` is an additive homomorphism between two additive monoids, then
`Finsupp.mapDomain f` is an algebra homomorphism between their add monoid algebras. -/
@[simps!]
def mapDomainAlgHom (k A : Type*) [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [AddMonoid G]
{H F : Type*} [AddMonoid H] [FunLike F G H] [AddMonoidHomClass F G H] (f : F) :
A[G] →ₐ[k] A[H] :=
{ mapDomainRingHom A f with commutes' := mapDomain_algebraMap A f }
@[simp]
lemma mapDomainAlgHom_id (k A) [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A] [AddMonoid G] :
mapDomainAlgHom k A (AddMonoidHom.id G) = AlgHom.id k (AddMonoidAlgebra A G) := by
ext; simp [AddMonoidHom.id, ← Function.id_def]
@[simp]
lemma mapDomainAlgHom_comp (k A) {G₁ G₂ G₃} [CommSemiring k] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A]
[AddMonoid G₁] [AddMonoid G₂] [AddMonoid G₃] (f : G₁ →+ G₂) (g : G₂ →+ G₃) :
mapDomainAlgHom k A (g.comp f) = (mapDomainAlgHom k A g).comp (mapDomainAlgHom k A f) := by
ext; simp [mapDomain_comp]
variable (k A)
variable [CommSemiring k] [AddMonoid G] [AddMonoid H] [Semiring A] [Algebra k A]
/-- If `e : G ≃* H` is a multiplicative equivalence between two monoids, then
`AddMonoidAlgebra.domCongr e` is an algebra equivalence between their monoid algebras. -/
def domCongr (e : G ≃+ H) : A[G] ≃ₐ[k] A[H] :=
AlgEquiv.ofLinearEquiv
(Finsupp.domLCongr e : (G →₀ A) ≃ₗ[k] (H →₀ A))
((equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).trans <| mapDomain_one e)
(fun f g => (equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).trans <| (mapDomain_mul e f g).trans <|
congr_arg₂ _ (equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).symm (equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _).symm)
theorem domCongr_toAlgHom (e : G ≃+ H) : (domCongr k A e).toAlgHom = mapDomainAlgHom k A e :=
AlgHom.ext fun _ => equivMapDomain_eq_mapDomain _ _
@[simp] theorem domCongr_apply (e : G ≃+ H) (f : MonoidAlgebra A G) (h : H) :
domCongr k A e f h = f (e.symm h) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem domCongr_support (e : G ≃+ H) (f : MonoidAlgebra A G) :
(domCongr k A e f).support = f.support.map e :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem domCongr_single (e : G ≃+ H) (g : G) (a : A) :
domCongr k A e (single g a) = single (e g) a :=
Finsupp.equivMapDomain_single _ _ _
@[simp] theorem domCongr_refl : domCongr k A (AddEquiv.refl G) = AlgEquiv.refl :=
AlgEquiv.ext fun _ => Finsupp.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp] theorem domCongr_symm (e : G ≃+ H) : (domCongr k A e).symm = domCongr k A e.symm := rfl
|
end AddMonoidAlgebra
variable [CommSemiring R]
/-- The algebra equivalence between `AddMonoidAlgebra` and `MonoidAlgebra` in terms of
`Multiplicative`. -/
def AddMonoidAlgebra.toMultiplicativeAlgEquiv [Semiring k] [Algebra R k] [AddMonoid G] :
AddMonoidAlgebra k G ≃ₐ[R] MonoidAlgebra k (Multiplicative G) :=
{ AddMonoidAlgebra.toMultiplicative k G with
commutes' := fun r => by simp [AddMonoidAlgebra.toMultiplicative] }
| Mathlib/Algebra/MonoidAlgebra/Basic.lean | 578 | 588 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Control.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.List.Monad
import Mathlib.Logic.OpClass
import Mathlib.Logic.Unique
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Basic properties of lists
-/
assert_not_exists GroupWithZero
assert_not_exists Lattice
assert_not_exists Prod.swap_eq_iff_eq_swap
assert_not_exists Ring
assert_not_exists Set.range
open Function
open Nat hiding one_pos
namespace List
universe u v w
variable {ι : Type*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {l₁ l₂ : List α}
/-- There is only one list of an empty type -/
instance uniqueOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] : Unique (List α) :=
{ instInhabitedList with
uniq := fun l =>
match l with
| [] => rfl
| a :: _ => isEmptyElim a }
instance : Std.LawfulIdentity (α := List α) Append.append [] where
left_id := nil_append
right_id := append_nil
instance : Std.Associative (α := List α) Append.append where
assoc := append_assoc
@[simp] theorem cons_injective {a : α} : Injective (cons a) := fun _ _ => tail_eq_of_cons_eq
theorem singleton_injective : Injective fun a : α => [a] := fun _ _ h => (cons_eq_cons.1 h).1
theorem set_of_mem_cons (l : List α) (a : α) : { x | x ∈ a :: l } = insert a { x | x ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_cons
/-! ### mem -/
theorem _root_.Decidable.List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem [DecidableEq α]
{a b : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ b :: l) : a = b ∨ a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l := by
by_cases hab : a = b
· exact Or.inl hab
· exact ((List.mem_cons.1 h).elim Or.inl (fun h => Or.inr ⟨hab, h⟩))
lemma mem_pair {a b c : α} : a ∈ [b, c] ↔ a = b ∨ a = c := by
rw [mem_cons, mem_singleton]
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `List.mem_map`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- It seems the side condition `hf` is not applied by `simpNF`.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem mem_map_of_injective {f : α → β} (H : Injective f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
f a ∈ map f l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun m => let ⟨_, m', e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map m; H e ▸ m', mem_map_of_mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff {f : α → α}
(hf : Function.Involutive f) (x : α) (l : List α) : (∃ y : α, y ∈ l ∧ f y = x) ↔ f x ∈ l :=
⟨by rintro ⟨y, h, rfl⟩; rwa [hf y], fun h => ⟨f x, h, hf _⟩⟩
theorem mem_map_of_involutive {f : α → α} (hf : Involutive f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
a ∈ map f l ↔ f a ∈ l := by rw [mem_map, hf.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff]
/-! ### length -/
alias ⟨_, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩ := length_pos_iff
theorem length_pos_iff_ne_nil {l : List α} : 0 < length l ↔ l ≠ [] :=
⟨ne_nil_of_length_pos, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩
theorem exists_of_length_succ {n} : ∀ l : List α, l.length = n + 1 → ∃ h t, l = h :: t
| [], H => absurd H.symm <| succ_ne_zero n
| h :: t, _ => ⟨h, t, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma length_injective_iff : Injective (List.length : List α → ℕ) ↔ Subsingleton α := by
constructor
· intro h; refine ⟨fun x y => ?_⟩; (suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this); apply h; rfl
· intros hα l1 l2 hl
induction l1 generalizing l2 <;> cases l2
· rfl
· cases hl
· cases hl
· next ih _ _ =>
congr
· subsingleton
· apply ih; simpa using hl
@[simp default+1] -- Raise priority above `length_injective_iff`.
lemma length_injective [Subsingleton α] : Injective (length : List α → ℕ) :=
length_injective_iff.mpr inferInstance
theorem length_eq_two {l : List α} : l.length = 2 ↔ ∃ a b, l = [a, b] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b] := l; ⟨a, b, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
theorem length_eq_three {l : List α} : l.length = 3 ↔ ∃ a b c, l = [a, b, c] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b, c] := l; ⟨a, b, c, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
/-! ### set-theoretic notation of lists -/
instance instSingletonList : Singleton α (List α) := ⟨fun x => [x]⟩
instance [DecidableEq α] : Insert α (List α) := ⟨List.insert⟩
instance [DecidableEq α] : LawfulSingleton α (List α) :=
{ insert_empty_eq := fun x =>
show (if x ∈ ([] : List α) then [] else [x]) = [x] from if_neg not_mem_nil }
theorem singleton_eq (x : α) : ({x} : List α) = [x] :=
rfl
theorem insert_neg [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∉ l) :
Insert.insert x l = x :: l :=
insert_of_not_mem h
theorem insert_pos [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∈ l) : Insert.insert x l = l :=
insert_of_mem h
theorem doubleton_eq [DecidableEq α] {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : List α) = [x, y] := by
rw [insert_neg, singleton_eq]
rwa [singleton_eq, mem_singleton]
/-! ### bounded quantifiers over lists -/
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} (h : ∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
∀ x ∈ l, p x := (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2
theorem exists_mem_cons_of {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (l : List α) (h : p a) : ∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
⟨a, mem_cons_self, h⟩
theorem exists_mem_cons_of_exists {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ l, p x) →
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xl, px⟩ => ⟨x, mem_cons_of_mem _ xl, px⟩
theorem or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) →
p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xal, px⟩ =>
Or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xal) (fun h : x = a => by rw [← h]; left; exact px)
fun h : x ∈ l => Or.inr ⟨x, h, px⟩
theorem exists_mem_cons_iff (p : α → Prop) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
Iff.intro or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons fun h =>
Or.elim h (exists_mem_cons_of l) exists_mem_cons_of_exists
/-! ### list subset -/
theorem cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem {a : α} {l m : List α}
(ainm : a ∈ m) (lsubm : l ⊆ m) : a::l ⊆ m :=
cons_subset.2 ⟨ainm, lsubm⟩
theorem append_subset_of_subset_of_subset {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (l₁subl : l₁ ⊆ l) (l₂subl : l₂ ⊆ l) :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l :=
fun _ h ↦ (mem_append.1 h).elim (@l₁subl _) (@l₂subl _)
theorem map_subset_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} (f : α → β) (h : Injective f) :
map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ ↔ l₁ ⊆ l₂ := by
refine ⟨?_, map_subset f⟩; intro h2 x hx
rcases mem_map.1 (h2 (mem_map_of_mem hx)) with ⟨x', hx', hxx'⟩
cases h hxx'; exact hx'
/-! ### append -/
theorem append_eq_has_append {L₁ L₂ : List α} : List.append L₁ L₂ = L₁ ++ L₂ :=
rfl
theorem append_right_injective (s : List α) : Injective fun t ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_left
theorem append_left_injective (t : List α) : Injective fun s ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_right
/-! ### replicate -/
theorem eq_replicate_length {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, l = replicate l.length a ↔ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a
| [] => by simp
| (b :: l) => by simp [eq_replicate_length, replicate_succ]
theorem replicate_add (m n) (a : α) : replicate (m + n) a = replicate m a ++ replicate n a := by
rw [replicate_append_replicate]
theorem replicate_subset_singleton (n) (a : α) : replicate n a ⊆ [a] := fun _ h =>
mem_singleton.2 (eq_of_mem_replicate h)
theorem subset_singleton_iff {a : α} {L : List α} : L ⊆ [a] ↔ ∃ n, L = replicate n a := by
simp only [eq_replicate_iff, subset_def, mem_singleton, exists_eq_left']
theorem replicate_right_injective {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : Injective (@replicate α n) :=
fun _ _ h => (eq_replicate_iff.1 h).2 _ <| mem_replicate.2 ⟨hn, rfl⟩
theorem replicate_right_inj {a b : α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ a = b :=
(replicate_right_injective hn).eq_iff
theorem replicate_right_inj' {a b : α} : ∀ {n},
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ n = 0 ∨ a = b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => (replicate_right_inj n.succ_ne_zero).trans <| by simp only [n.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
theorem replicate_left_injective (a : α) : Injective (replicate · a) :=
LeftInverse.injective (length_replicate (n := ·))
theorem replicate_left_inj {a : α} {n m : ℕ} : replicate n a = replicate m a ↔ n = m :=
(replicate_left_injective a).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem head?_flatten_replicate {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) (l : List α) :
(List.replicate n l).flatten.head? = l.head? := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h
induction l <;> simp [replicate]
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_flatten_replicate {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) (l : List α) :
(List.replicate n l).flatten.getLast? = l.getLast? := by
rw [← List.head?_reverse, ← List.head?_reverse, List.reverse_flatten, List.map_replicate,
List.reverse_replicate, head?_flatten_replicate h]
/-! ### pure -/
theorem mem_pure (x y : α) : x ∈ (pure y : List α) ↔ x = y := by simp
/-! ### bind -/
@[simp]
theorem bind_eq_flatMap {α β} (f : α → List β) (l : List α) : l >>= f = l.flatMap f :=
rfl
/-! ### concat -/
/-! ### reverse -/
theorem reverse_cons' (a : α) (l : List α) : reverse (a :: l) = concat (reverse l) a := by
simp only [reverse_cons, concat_eq_append]
theorem reverse_concat' (l : List α) (a : α) : (l ++ [a]).reverse = a :: l.reverse := by
rw [reverse_append]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_singleton (a : α) : reverse [a] = [a] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_involutive : Involutive (@reverse α) :=
reverse_reverse
@[simp]
theorem reverse_injective : Injective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.injective
theorem reverse_surjective : Surjective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.surjective
theorem reverse_bijective : Bijective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.bijective
theorem concat_eq_reverse_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : concat l a = reverse (a :: reverse l) := by
simp only [concat_eq_append, reverse_cons, reverse_reverse]
theorem map_reverseAux (f : α → β) (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
map f (reverseAux l₁ l₂) = reverseAux (map f l₁) (map f l₂) := by
simp only [reverseAux_eq, map_append, map_reverse]
-- TODO: Rename `List.reverse_perm` to `List.reverse_perm_self`
@[simp] lemma reverse_perm' : l₁.reverse ~ l₂ ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ where
mp := l₁.reverse_perm.symm.trans
mpr := l₁.reverse_perm.trans
@[simp] lemma perm_reverse : l₁ ~ l₂.reverse ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ where
mp hl := hl.trans l₂.reverse_perm
mpr hl := hl.trans l₂.reverse_perm.symm
/-! ### getLast -/
attribute [simp] getLast_cons
theorem getLast_append_singleton {a : α} (l : List α) :
getLast (l ++ [a]) (append_ne_nil_of_right_ne_nil l (cons_ne_nil a _)) = a := by
simp [getLast_append]
theorem getLast_append_of_right_ne_nil (l₁ l₂ : List α) (h : l₂ ≠ []) :
getLast (l₁ ++ l₂) (append_ne_nil_of_right_ne_nil l₁ h) = getLast l₂ h := by
induction l₁ with
| nil => simp
| cons _ _ ih => simp only [cons_append]; rw [List.getLast_cons]; exact ih
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias getLast_append' := getLast_append_of_right_ne_nil
theorem getLast_concat' {a : α} (l : List α) : getLast (concat l a) (by simp) = a := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem getLast_singleton' (a : α) : getLast [a] (cons_ne_nil a []) = a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem getLast_cons_cons (a₁ a₂ : α) (l : List α) :
getLast (a₁ :: a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) = getLast (a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil a₂ l) :=
rfl
theorem dropLast_append_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), dropLast l ++ [getLast l h] = l
| [], h => absurd rfl h
| [_], _ => rfl
| a :: b :: l, h => by
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, getLast_cons (cons_ne_nil _ _)]
congr
exact dropLast_append_getLast (cons_ne_nil b l)
theorem getLast_congr {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ ≠ []) (h₂ : l₂ ≠ []) (h₃ : l₁ = l₂) :
getLast l₁ h₁ = getLast l₂ h₂ := by subst l₁; rfl
theorem getLast_replicate_succ (m : ℕ) (a : α) :
(replicate (m + 1) a).getLast (ne_nil_of_length_eq_add_one length_replicate) = a := by
simp only [replicate_succ']
exact getLast_append_singleton _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")]
alias getLast_filter' := getLast_filter_of_pos
/-! ### getLast? -/
theorem mem_getLast?_eq_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} {x : α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → ∃ h, x = getLast l h
| [], x, hx => False.elim <| by simp at hx
| [a], x, hx =>
have : a = x := by simpa using hx
this ▸ ⟨cons_ne_nil a [], rfl⟩
| a :: b :: l, x, hx => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hx
rcases mem_getLast?_eq_getLast hx with ⟨_, h₂⟩
use cons_ne_nil _ _
assumption
theorem getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), l.getLast? = some (l.getLast h)
| [], h => (h rfl).elim
| [_], _ => rfl
| _ :: b :: l, _ => @getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil (b :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)
theorem mem_getLast?_cons {x y : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → x ∈ (y :: l).getLast?
| [], _ => by contradiction
| _ :: _, h => h
theorem dropLast_append_getLast? : ∀ {l : List α}, ∀ a ∈ l.getLast?, dropLast l ++ [a] = l
| [], a, ha => (Option.not_mem_none a ha).elim
| [a], _, rfl => rfl
| a :: b :: l, c, hc => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hc
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, dropLast_append_getLast? _ hc]
theorem getLastI_eq_getLast? [Inhabited α] : ∀ l : List α, l.getLastI = l.getLast?.iget
| [] => by simp [getLastI, Inhabited.default]
| [_] => rfl
| [_, _] => rfl
| [_, _, _] => rfl
| _ :: _ :: c :: l => by simp [getLastI, getLastI_eq_getLast? (c :: l)]
theorem getLast?_append_cons :
∀ (l₁ : List α) (a : α) (l₂ : List α), getLast? (l₁ ++ a :: l₂) = getLast? (a :: l₂)
| [], _, _ => rfl
| [_], _, _ => rfl
| b :: c :: l₁, a, l₂ => by rw [cons_append, cons_append, getLast?_cons_cons,
← cons_append, getLast?_append_cons (c :: l₁)]
theorem getLast?_append_of_ne_nil (l₁ : List α) :
∀ {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₂ ≠ []), getLast? (l₁ ++ l₂) = getLast? l₂
| [], hl₂ => by contradiction
| b :: l₂, _ => getLast?_append_cons l₁ b l₂
theorem mem_getLast?_append_of_mem_getLast? {l₁ l₂ : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ l₂.getLast?) :
x ∈ (l₁ ++ l₂).getLast? := by
cases l₂
· contradiction
· rw [List.getLast?_append_cons]
exact h
/-! ### head(!?) and tail -/
@[simp]
theorem head!_nil [Inhabited α] : ([] : List α).head! = default := rfl
@[simp] theorem head_cons_tail (x : List α) (h : x ≠ []) : x.head h :: x.tail = x := by
cases x <;> simp at h ⊢
theorem head_eq_getElem_zero {l : List α} (hl : l ≠ []) :
l.head hl = l[0]'(length_pos_iff.2 hl) :=
(getElem_zero _).symm
theorem head!_eq_head? [Inhabited α] (l : List α) : head! l = (head? l).iget := by cases l <;> rfl
theorem surjective_head! [Inhabited α] : Surjective (@head! α _) := fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩
theorem surjective_head? : Surjective (@head? α) :=
Option.forall.2 ⟨⟨[], rfl⟩, fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩⟩
theorem surjective_tail : Surjective (@tail α)
| [] => ⟨[], rfl⟩
| a :: l => ⟨a :: a :: l, rfl⟩
theorem eq_cons_of_mem_head? {x : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.head? → l = x :: tail l
| [], h => (Option.not_mem_none _ h).elim
| a :: l, h => by
simp only [head?, Option.mem_def, Option.some_inj] at h
exact h ▸ rfl
@[simp] theorem head!_cons [Inhabited α] (a : α) (l : List α) : head! (a :: l) = a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem head!_append [Inhabited α] (t : List α) {s : List α} (h : s ≠ []) :
head! (s ++ t) = head! s := by
induction s
· contradiction
· rfl
theorem mem_head?_append_of_mem_head? {s t : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s.head?) :
x ∈ (s ++ t).head? := by
cases s
· contradiction
· exact h
theorem head?_append_of_ne_nil :
∀ (l₁ : List α) {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₁ ≠ []), head? (l₁ ++ l₂) = head? l₁
| _ :: _, _, _ => rfl
theorem tail_append_singleton_of_ne_nil {a : α} {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) :
tail (l ++ [a]) = tail l ++ [a] := by
induction l
· contradiction
· rw [tail, cons_append, tail]
theorem cons_head?_tail : ∀ {l : List α} {a : α}, a ∈ head? l → a :: tail l = l
| [], a, h => by contradiction
| b :: l, a, h => by
simp? at h says simp only [head?_cons, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq] at h
simp [h]
theorem head!_mem_head? [Inhabited α] : ∀ {l : List α}, l ≠ [] → head! l ∈ head? l
| [], h => by contradiction
| _ :: _, _ => rfl
theorem cons_head!_tail [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []) : head! l :: tail l = l :=
cons_head?_tail (head!_mem_head? h)
theorem head!_mem_self [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) : l.head! ∈ l := by
have h' : l.head! ∈ l.head! :: l.tail := mem_cons_self
rwa [cons_head!_tail h] at h'
theorem get_eq_getElem? (l : List α) (i : Fin l.length) :
l.get i = l[i]?.get (by simp [getElem?_eq_getElem]) := by
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias get_eq_get? := get_eq_getElem?
theorem exists_mem_iff_getElem {l : List α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ x ∈ l, p x) ↔ ∃ (i : ℕ) (_ : i < l.length), p l[i] := by
simp only [mem_iff_getElem]
exact ⟨fun ⟨_x, ⟨i, hi, hix⟩, hxp⟩ ↦ ⟨i, hi, hix ▸ hxp⟩, fun ⟨i, hi, hp⟩ ↦ ⟨_, ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩, hp⟩⟩
theorem forall_mem_iff_getElem {l : List α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ x ∈ l, p x) ↔ ∀ (i : ℕ) (_ : i < l.length), p l[i] := by
simp [mem_iff_getElem, @forall_swap α]
theorem get_tail (l : List α) (i) (h : i < l.tail.length)
(h' : i + 1 < l.length := (by simp only [length_tail] at h; omega)) :
l.tail.get ⟨i, h⟩ = l.get ⟨i + 1, h'⟩ := by
cases l <;> [cases h; rfl]
/-! ### sublists -/
attribute [refl] List.Sublist.refl
theorem Sublist.cons_cons {l₁ l₂ : List α} (a : α) (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : a :: l₁ <+ a :: l₂ :=
Sublist.cons₂ _ s
lemma cons_sublist_cons' {a b : α} : a :: l₁ <+ b :: l₂ ↔ a :: l₁ <+ l₂ ∨ a = b ∧ l₁ <+ l₂ := by
constructor
· rintro (_ | _)
· exact Or.inl ‹_›
· exact Or.inr ⟨rfl, ‹_›⟩
· rintro (h | ⟨rfl, h⟩)
· exact h.cons _
· rwa [cons_sublist_cons]
theorem sublist_cons_of_sublist (a : α) (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁ <+ a :: l₂ := h.cons _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")]
alias sublist_nil_iff_eq_nil := sublist_nil
@[simp] lemma sublist_singleton {l : List α} {a : α} : l <+ [a] ↔ l = [] ∨ l = [a] := by
constructor <;> rintro (_ | _) <;> aesop
theorem Sublist.antisymm (s₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (s₂ : l₂ <+ l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
s₁.eq_of_length_le s₂.length_le
/-- If the first element of two lists are different, then a sublist relation can be reduced. -/
theorem Sublist.of_cons_of_ne {a b} (h₁ : a ≠ b) (h₂ : a :: l₁ <+ b :: l₂) : a :: l₁ <+ l₂ :=
match h₁, h₂ with
| _, .cons _ h => h
/-! ### indexOf -/
section IndexOf
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem idxOf_cons_eq {a b : α} (l : List α) : b = a → idxOf a (b :: l) = 0
| e => by rw [← e]; exact idxOf_cons_self
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_cons_eq := idxOf_cons_eq
@[simp]
theorem idxOf_cons_ne {a b : α} (l : List α) : b ≠ a → idxOf a (b :: l) = succ (idxOf a l)
| h => by simp only [idxOf_cons, Bool.cond_eq_ite, beq_iff_eq, if_neg h]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_cons_ne := idxOf_cons_ne
theorem idxOf_eq_length_iff {a : α} {l : List α} : idxOf a l = length l ↔ a ∉ l := by
induction l with
| nil => exact iff_of_true rfl not_mem_nil
| cons b l ih =>
simp only [length, mem_cons, idxOf_cons, eq_comm]
rw [cond_eq_if]
split_ifs with h <;> simp at h
· exact iff_of_false (by rintro ⟨⟩) fun H => H <| Or.inl h.symm
· simp only [Ne.symm h, false_or]
rw [← ih]
exact succ_inj
@[simp]
theorem idxOf_of_not_mem {l : List α} {a : α} : a ∉ l → idxOf a l = length l :=
idxOf_eq_length_iff.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_of_not_mem := idxOf_of_not_mem
theorem idxOf_le_length {a : α} {l : List α} : idxOf a l ≤ length l := by
induction l with | nil => rfl | cons b l ih => ?_
simp only [length, idxOf_cons, cond_eq_if, beq_iff_eq]
by_cases h : b = a
· rw [if_pos h]; exact Nat.zero_le _
· rw [if_neg h]; exact succ_le_succ ih
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_le_length := idxOf_le_length
theorem idxOf_lt_length_iff {a} {l : List α} : idxOf a l < length l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun h => Decidable.byContradiction fun al => Nat.ne_of_lt h <| idxOf_eq_length_iff.2 al,
fun al => (lt_of_le_of_ne idxOf_le_length) fun h => idxOf_eq_length_iff.1 h al⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_lt_length_iff := idxOf_lt_length_iff
theorem idxOf_append_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ l₁) : idxOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = idxOf a l₁ := by
induction l₁ with
| nil =>
exfalso
exact not_mem_nil h
| cons d₁ t₁ ih =>
rw [List.cons_append]
by_cases hh : d₁ = a
· iterate 2 rw [idxOf_cons_eq _ hh]
rw [idxOf_cons_ne _ hh, idxOf_cons_ne _ hh, ih (mem_of_ne_of_mem (Ne.symm hh) h)]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_append_of_mem := idxOf_append_of_mem
theorem idxOf_append_of_not_mem {a : α} (h : a ∉ l₁) :
idxOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁.length + idxOf a l₂ := by
induction l₁ with
| nil => rw [List.nil_append, List.length, Nat.zero_add]
| cons d₁ t₁ ih =>
rw [List.cons_append, idxOf_cons_ne _ (ne_of_not_mem_cons h).symm, List.length,
ih (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons h), Nat.succ_add]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_append_of_not_mem := idxOf_append_of_not_mem
end IndexOf
/-! ### nth element -/
section deprecated
@[simp]
theorem getElem?_length (l : List α) : l[l.length]? = none := getElem?_eq_none le_rfl
/-- A version of `getElem_map` that can be used for rewriting. -/
theorem getElem_map_rev (f : α → β) {l} {n : Nat} {h : n < l.length} :
f l[n] = (map f l)[n]'((l.length_map f).symm ▸ h) := Eq.symm (getElem_map _)
theorem get_length_sub_one {l : List α} (h : l.length - 1 < l.length) :
l.get ⟨l.length - 1, h⟩ = l.getLast (by rintro rfl; exact Nat.lt_irrefl 0 h) :=
(getLast_eq_getElem _).symm
theorem take_one_drop_eq_of_lt_length {l : List α} {n : ℕ} (h : n < l.length) :
(l.drop n).take 1 = [l.get ⟨n, h⟩] := by
rw [drop_eq_getElem_cons h, take, take]
simp
theorem ext_getElem?' {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h' : ∀ n < max l₁.length l₂.length, l₁[n]? = l₂[n]?) :
l₁ = l₂ := by
apply ext_getElem?
intro n
rcases Nat.lt_or_ge n <| max l₁.length l₂.length with hn | hn
· exact h' n hn
· simp_all [Nat.max_le, getElem?_eq_none]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?' := ext_getElem?'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?_iff := List.ext_getElem?_iff
theorem ext_get_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
l₁ = l₂ ↔ l₁.length = l₂.length ∧ ∀ n h₁ h₂, get l₁ ⟨n, h₁⟩ = get l₂ ⟨n, h₂⟩ := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨rfl, fun _ _ _ ↦ rfl⟩
· intro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
exact ext_get h₁ h₂
theorem ext_getElem?_iff' {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ = l₂ ↔
∀ n < max l₁.length l₂.length, l₁[n]? = l₂[n]? :=
⟨by rintro rfl _ _; rfl, ext_getElem?'⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias ext_get?_iff' := ext_getElem?_iff'
/-- If two lists `l₁` and `l₂` are the same length and `l₁[n]! = l₂[n]!` for all `n`,
then the lists are equal. -/
theorem ext_getElem! [Inhabited α] (hl : length l₁ = length l₂) (h : ∀ n : ℕ, l₁[n]! = l₂[n]!) :
l₁ = l₂ :=
ext_getElem hl fun n h₁ h₂ ↦ by simpa only [← getElem!_pos] using h n
@[simp]
theorem getElem_idxOf [DecidableEq α] {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α} (h : idxOf a l < l.length),
l[idxOf a l] = a
| b :: l, h => by
by_cases h' : b = a <;>
simp [h', if_pos, if_false, getElem_idxOf]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias getElem_indexOf := getElem_idxOf
-- This is incorrectly named and should be `get_idxOf`;
-- this already exists, so will require a deprecation dance.
theorem idxOf_get [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h) : get l ⟨idxOf a l, h⟩ = a := by
simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_get := idxOf_get
@[simp]
theorem getElem?_idxOf [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
l[idxOf a l]? = some a := by
rw [getElem?_eq_getElem, getElem_idxOf (idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 h)]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias getElem?_indexOf := getElem?_idxOf
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias idxOf_get? := getElem?_idxOf
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_get? := getElem?_idxOf
theorem idxOf_inj [DecidableEq α] {l : List α} {x y : α} (hx : x ∈ l) (hy : y ∈ l) :
idxOf x l = idxOf y l ↔ x = y :=
⟨fun h => by
have x_eq_y :
get l ⟨idxOf x l, idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 hx⟩ =
get l ⟨idxOf y l, idxOf_lt_length_iff.2 hy⟩ := by
simp only [h]
simp only [idxOf_get] at x_eq_y; exact x_eq_y, fun h => by subst h; rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-30")] alias indexOf_inj := idxOf_inj
theorem get_reverse' (l : List α) (n) (hn') :
l.reverse.get n = l.get ⟨l.length - 1 - n, hn'⟩ := by
simp
theorem eq_cons_of_length_one {l : List α} (h : l.length = 1) : l = [l.get ⟨0, by omega⟩] := by
refine ext_get (by convert h) fun n h₁ h₂ => ?_
simp
congr
omega
end deprecated
@[simp]
theorem getElem_set_of_ne {l : List α} {i j : ℕ} (h : i ≠ j) (a : α)
(hj : j < (l.set i a).length) :
(l.set i a)[j] = l[j]'(by simpa using hj) := by
rw [← Option.some_inj, ← List.getElem?_eq_getElem, List.getElem?_set_ne h,
List.getElem?_eq_getElem]
/-! ### map -/
-- `List.map_const` (the version with `Function.const` instead of a lambda) is already tagged
-- `simp` in Core
-- TODO: Upstream the tagging to Core?
attribute [simp] map_const'
theorem flatMap_pure_eq_map (f : α → β) (l : List α) : l.flatMap (pure ∘ f) = map f l :=
.symm <| map_eq_flatMap ..
theorem flatMap_congr {l : List α} {f g : α → List β} (h : ∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) :
l.flatMap f = l.flatMap g :=
(congr_arg List.flatten <| map_congr_left h :)
theorem infix_flatMap_of_mem {a : α} {as : List α} (h : a ∈ as) (f : α → List α) :
f a <:+: as.flatMap f :=
infix_of_mem_flatten (mem_map_of_mem h)
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (l : List α) : f <$> l = map f l :=
rfl
/-- A single `List.map` of a composition of functions is equal to
composing a `List.map` with another `List.map`, fully applied.
This is the reverse direction of `List.map_map`.
-/
theorem comp_map (h : β → γ) (g : α → β) (l : List α) : map (h ∘ g) l = map h (map g l) :=
map_map.symm
/-- Composing a `List.map` with another `List.map` is equal to
a single `List.map` of composed functions.
-/
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) : map g ∘ map f = map (g ∘ f) := by
ext l; rw [comp_map, Function.comp_apply]
section map_bijectivity
theorem _root_.Function.LeftInverse.list_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse f g) :
LeftInverse (map f) (map g)
| [] => by simp_rw [map_nil]
| x :: xs => by simp_rw [map_cons, h x, h.list_map xs]
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.RightInverse.list_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(h : RightInverse f g) : RightInverse (map f) (map g) :=
h.list_map
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.list_map {f : α → α}
(h : Involutive f) : Involutive (map f) :=
Function.LeftInverse.list_map h
@[simp]
theorem map_leftInverse_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
LeftInverse (map f) (map g) ↔ LeftInverse f g :=
⟨fun h x => by injection h [x], (·.list_map)⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_rightInverse_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
RightInverse (map f) (map g) ↔ RightInverse f g := map_leftInverse_iff
@[simp]
theorem map_involutive_iff {f : α → α} :
Involutive (map f) ↔ Involutive f := map_leftInverse_iff
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Injective f) :
Injective (map f)
| [], [], _ => rfl
| x :: xs, y :: ys, hxy => by
injection hxy with hxy hxys
rw [h hxy, h.list_map hxys]
@[simp]
theorem map_injective_iff {f : α → β} : Injective (map f) ↔ Injective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x y hxy => ?_, (·.list_map)⟩
suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this
apply h
simp [hxy]
theorem _root_.Function.Surjective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Surjective f) :
Surjective (map f) :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := h.hasRightInverse; h.list_map.surjective
@[simp]
theorem map_surjective_iff {f : α → β} : Surjective (map f) ↔ Surjective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x => ?_, (·.list_map)⟩
let ⟨[y], hxy⟩ := h [x]
exact ⟨_, List.singleton_injective hxy⟩
theorem _root_.Function.Bijective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Bijective f) : Bijective (map f) :=
⟨h.1.list_map, h.2.list_map⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_bijective_iff {f : α → β} : Bijective (map f) ↔ Bijective f := by
simp_rw [Function.Bijective, map_injective_iff, map_surjective_iff]
end map_bijectivity
theorem eq_of_mem_map_const {b₁ b₂ : β} {l : List α} (h : b₁ ∈ map (const α b₂) l) :
b₁ = b₂ := by rw [map_const] at h; exact eq_of_mem_replicate h
/-- `eq_nil_or_concat` in simp normal form -/
lemma eq_nil_or_concat' (l : List α) : l = [] ∨ ∃ L b, l = L ++ [b] := by
simpa using l.eq_nil_or_concat
/-! ### foldl, foldr -/
theorem foldl_ext (f g : α → β → α) (a : α) {l : List β} (H : ∀ a : α, ∀ b ∈ l, f a b = g a b) :
foldl f a l = foldl g a l := by
induction l generalizing a with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl ih =>
unfold foldl
rw [ih _ fun a b bin => H a b <| mem_cons_of_mem _ bin, H a hd mem_cons_self]
theorem foldr_ext (f g : α → β → β) (b : β) {l : List α} (H : ∀ a ∈ l, ∀ b : β, f a b = g a b) :
foldr f b l = foldr g b l := by
induction l with | nil => rfl | cons hd tl ih => ?_
simp only [mem_cons, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq] at H
simp only [foldr, ih H.2, H.1]
theorem foldl_concat
(f : β → α → β) (b : β) (x : α) (xs : List α) :
List.foldl f b (xs ++ [x]) = f (List.foldl f b xs) x := by
simp only [List.foldl_append, List.foldl]
theorem foldr_concat
(f : α → β → β) (b : β) (x : α) (xs : List α) :
List.foldr f b (xs ++ [x]) = (List.foldr f (f x b) xs) := by
simp only [List.foldr_append, List.foldr]
theorem foldl_fixed' {f : α → β → α} {a : α} (hf : ∀ b, f a b = a) : ∀ l : List β, foldl f a l = a
| [] => rfl
| b :: l => by rw [foldl_cons, hf b, foldl_fixed' hf l]
theorem foldr_fixed' {f : α → β → β} {b : β} (hf : ∀ a, f a b = b) : ∀ l : List α, foldr f b l = b
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => by rw [foldr_cons, foldr_fixed' hf l, hf a]
@[simp]
theorem foldl_fixed {a : α} : ∀ l : List β, foldl (fun a _ => a) a l = a :=
foldl_fixed' fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem foldr_fixed {b : β} : ∀ l : List α, foldr (fun _ b => b) b l = b :=
foldr_fixed' fun _ => rfl
@[deprecated foldr_cons_nil (since := "2025-02-10")]
theorem foldr_eta (l : List α) : foldr cons [] l = l := foldr_cons_nil
theorem reverse_foldl {l : List α} : reverse (foldl (fun t h => h :: t) [] l) = l := by
simp
theorem foldl_hom₂ (l : List ι) (f : α → β → γ) (op₁ : α → ι → α) (op₂ : β → ι → β)
(op₃ : γ → ι → γ) (a : α) (b : β) (h : ∀ a b i, f (op₁ a i) (op₂ b i) = op₃ (f a b) i) :
foldl op₃ (f a b) l = f (foldl op₁ a l) (foldl op₂ b l) :=
Eq.symm <| by
revert a b
induction l <;> intros <;> [rfl; simp only [*, foldl]]
theorem foldr_hom₂ (l : List ι) (f : α → β → γ) (op₁ : ι → α → α) (op₂ : ι → β → β)
(op₃ : ι → γ → γ) (a : α) (b : β) (h : ∀ a b i, f (op₁ i a) (op₂ i b) = op₃ i (f a b)) :
foldr op₃ (f a b) l = f (foldr op₁ a l) (foldr op₂ b l) := by
revert a
induction l <;> intros <;> [rfl; simp only [*, foldr]]
theorem injective_foldl_comp {l : List (α → α)} {f : α → α}
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, Function.Injective f) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (@List.foldl (α → α) (α → α) Function.comp f l) := by
induction l generalizing f with
| nil => exact hf
| cons lh lt l_ih =>
apply l_ih fun _ h => hl _ (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ h)
apply Function.Injective.comp hf
apply hl _ mem_cons_self
/-- Consider two lists `l₁` and `l₂` with designated elements `a₁` and `a₂` somewhere in them:
`l₁ = x₁ ++ [a₁] ++ z₁` and `l₂ = x₂ ++ [a₂] ++ z₂`.
Assume the designated element `a₂` is present in neither `x₁` nor `z₁`.
We conclude that the lists are equal (`l₁ = l₂`) if and only if their respective parts are equal
(`x₁ = x₂ ∧ a₁ = a₂ ∧ z₁ = z₂`). -/
lemma append_cons_inj_of_not_mem {x₁ x₂ z₁ z₂ : List α} {a₁ a₂ : α}
(notin_x : a₂ ∉ x₁) (notin_z : a₂ ∉ z₁) :
x₁ ++ a₁ :: z₁ = x₂ ++ a₂ :: z₂ ↔ x₁ = x₂ ∧ a₁ = a₂ ∧ z₁ = z₂ := by
constructor
· simp only [append_eq_append_iff, cons_eq_append_iff, cons_eq_cons]
rintro (⟨c, rfl, ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨d, rfl, rfl⟩⟩ |
⟨c, rfl, ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨d, rfl, rfl⟩⟩) <;> simp_all
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩
rfl
section FoldlEqFoldr
-- foldl and foldr coincide when f is commutative and associative
variable {f : α → α → α}
theorem foldl1_eq_foldr1 [hassoc : Std.Associative f] :
∀ a b l, foldl f a (l ++ [b]) = foldr f b (a :: l)
| _, _, nil => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by
simp only [cons_append, foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl1_eq_foldr1 _ _ l]
rw [hassoc.assoc]
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc [hcomm : Std.Commutative f] [hassoc : Std.Associative f] :
∀ a b l, foldl f a (b :: l) = f b (foldl f a l)
| a, b, nil => hcomm.comm a b
| a, b, c :: l => by
simp only [foldl_cons]
have : RightCommutative f := inferInstance
rw [← foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc .., this.right_comm, foldl_cons]
theorem foldl_eq_foldr [Std.Commutative f] [Std.Associative f] :
∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr f a l
| _, nil => rfl
| a, b :: l => by
simp only [foldr_cons, foldl_eq_of_comm_of_assoc]
rw [foldl_eq_foldr a l]
end FoldlEqFoldr
section FoldlEqFoldlr'
variable {f : α → β → α}
variable (hf : ∀ a b c, f (f a b) c = f (f a c) b)
include hf
theorem foldl_eq_of_comm' : ∀ a b l, foldl f a (b :: l) = f (foldl f a l) b
| _, _, [] => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by rw [foldl, foldl, foldl, ← foldl_eq_of_comm' .., foldl, hf]
theorem foldl_eq_foldr' : ∀ a l, foldl f a l = foldr (flip f) a l
| _, [] => rfl
| a, b :: l => by rw [foldl_eq_of_comm' hf, foldr, foldl_eq_foldr' ..]; rfl
end FoldlEqFoldlr'
section FoldlEqFoldlr'
variable {f : α → β → β}
theorem foldr_eq_of_comm' (hf : ∀ a b c, f a (f b c) = f b (f a c)) :
∀ a b l, foldr f a (b :: l) = foldr f (f b a) l
| _, _, [] => rfl
| a, b, c :: l => by rw [foldr, foldr, foldr, hf, ← foldr_eq_of_comm' hf ..]; rfl
end FoldlEqFoldlr'
section
variable {op : α → α → α} [ha : Std.Associative op]
/-- Notation for `op a b`. -/
local notation a " ⋆ " b => op a b
/-- Notation for `foldl op a l`. -/
local notation l " <*> " a => foldl op a l
theorem foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc :
∀ {l : List α} {a₁ a₂}, ((l <*> a₁) ⋆ a₂) = a₁ ⋆ l.foldr (· ⋆ ·) a₂
| [], _, _ => rfl
| a :: l, a₁, a₂ => by
simp only [foldl_cons, foldr_cons, foldl_assoc, ha.assoc]; rw [foldl_op_eq_op_foldr_assoc]
variable [hc : Std.Commutative op]
theorem foldl_assoc_comm_cons {l : List α} {a₁ a₂} : ((a₁ :: l) <*> a₂) = a₁ ⋆ l <*> a₂ := by
rw [foldl_cons, hc.comm, foldl_assoc]
end
/-! ### foldlM, foldrM, mapM -/
section FoldlMFoldrM
variable {m : Type v → Type w} [Monad m]
variable [LawfulMonad m]
theorem foldrM_eq_foldr (f : α → β → m β) (b l) :
foldrM f b l = foldr (fun a mb => mb >>= f a) (pure b) l := by induction l <;> simp [*]
theorem foldlM_eq_foldl (f : β → α → m β) (b l) :
List.foldlM f b l = foldl (fun mb a => mb >>= fun b => f b a) (pure b) l := by
suffices h :
∀ mb : m β, (mb >>= fun b => List.foldlM f b l) = foldl (fun mb a => mb >>= fun b => f b a) mb l
by simp [← h (pure b)]
induction l with
| nil => intro; simp
| cons _ _ l_ih => intro; simp only [List.foldlM, foldl, ← l_ih, functor_norm]
end FoldlMFoldrM
/-! ### intersperse -/
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias intersperse_singleton := intersperse_single
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias intersperse_cons_cons := intersperse_cons₂
/-! ### map for partial functions -/
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {l : List α} (hx : x ∈ l) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf l := by
induction l with | nil => ?_ | cons h t ih => ?_ <;> cases hx <;> rw [cons.sizeOf_spec]
· omega
· specialize ih ‹_›
omega
/-! ### filter -/
theorem length_eq_length_filter_add {l : List (α)} (f : α → Bool) :
l.length = (l.filter f).length + (l.filter (! f ·)).length := by
simp_rw [← List.countP_eq_length_filter, l.length_eq_countP_add_countP f, Bool.not_eq_true,
Bool.decide_eq_false]
/-! ### filterMap -/
theorem filterMap_eq_flatMap_toList (f : α → Option β) (l : List α) :
l.filterMap f = l.flatMap fun a ↦ (f a).toList := by
induction l with | nil => ?_ | cons a l ih => ?_ <;> simp [filterMap_cons]
rcases f a <;> simp [ih]
theorem filterMap_congr {f g : α → Option β} {l : List α}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) : l.filterMap f = l.filterMap g := by
induction l <;> simp_all [filterMap_cons]
theorem filterMap_eq_map_iff_forall_eq_some {f : α → Option β} {g : α → β} {l : List α} :
l.filterMap f = l.map g ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, f x = some (g x) where
mp := by
induction l with | nil => simp | cons a l ih => ?_
rcases ha : f a with - | b <;> simp [ha, filterMap_cons]
· intro h
simpa [show (filterMap f l).length = l.length + 1 from by simp[h], Nat.add_one_le_iff]
using List.length_filterMap_le f l
· rintro rfl h
exact ⟨rfl, ih h⟩
mpr h := Eq.trans (filterMap_congr <| by simpa) (congr_fun filterMap_eq_map _)
/-! ### filter -/
section Filter
variable {p : α → Bool}
theorem filter_singleton {a : α} : [a].filter p = bif p a then [a] else [] :=
rfl
theorem filter_eq_foldr (p : α → Bool) (l : List α) :
filter p l = foldr (fun a out => bif p a then a :: out else out) [] l := by
induction l <;> simp [*, filter]; rfl
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-07-27
This has to be temporarily renamed to avoid an unintentional collision.
The prime should be removed at nightly-2024-07-27. -/
@[simp]
theorem filter_subset' (l : List α) : filter p l ⊆ l :=
filter_sublist.subset
theorem of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a ∈ filter p l) : p a := (mem_filter.1 h).2
theorem mem_of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a ∈ filter p l) : a ∈ l :=
filter_subset' l h
theorem mem_filter_of_mem {a : α} {l} (h₁ : a ∈ l) (h₂ : p a) : a ∈ filter p l :=
mem_filter.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias monotone_filter_left := filter_subset
variable (p)
theorem monotone_filter_right (l : List α) ⦃p q : α → Bool⦄
(h : ∀ a, p a → q a) : l.filter p <+ l.filter q := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl IH =>
by_cases hp : p hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos hp, filter_cons_of_pos (h _ hp)]
exact IH.cons_cons hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg hp]
by_cases hq : q hd
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos hq]
exact sublist_cons_of_sublist hd IH
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg hq]
exact IH
lemma map_filter {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (l : List α)
[DecidablePred fun b => ∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b] :
(l.filter p).map f = (l.map f).filter fun b => ∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b := by
simp [comp_def, filter_map, hf.eq_iff]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")] alias map_filter' := map_filter
lemma filter_attach' (l : List α) (p : {a // a ∈ l} → Bool) [DecidableEq α] :
l.attach.filter p =
(l.filter fun x => ∃ h, p ⟨x, h⟩).attach.map (Subtype.map id fun _ => mem_of_mem_filter) := by
classical
refine map_injective_iff.2 Subtype.coe_injective ?_
simp [comp_def, map_filter _ Subtype.coe_injective]
lemma filter_attach (l : List α) (p : α → Bool) :
(l.attach.filter fun x => p x : List {x // x ∈ l}) =
(l.filter p).attach.map (Subtype.map id fun _ => mem_of_mem_filter) :=
map_injective_iff.2 Subtype.coe_injective <| by
simp_rw [map_map, comp_def, Subtype.map, id, ← Function.comp_apply (g := Subtype.val),
← filter_map, attach_map_subtype_val]
lemma filter_comm (q) (l : List α) : filter p (filter q l) = filter q (filter p l) := by
simp [Bool.and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem filter_true (l : List α) :
filter (fun _ => true) l = l := by induction l <;> simp [*, filter]
@[simp]
theorem filter_false (l : List α) :
filter (fun _ => false) l = [] := by induction l <;> simp [*, filter]
end Filter
/-! ### eraseP -/
section eraseP
variable {p : α → Bool}
@[simp]
theorem length_eraseP_add_one {l : List α} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a) :
(l.eraseP p).length + 1 = l.length := by
let ⟨_, l₁, l₂, _, _, h₁, h₂⟩ := exists_of_eraseP al pa
rw [h₂, h₁, length_append, length_append]
rfl
end eraseP
/-! ### erase -/
section Erase
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp] theorem length_erase_add_one {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
(l.erase a).length + 1 = l.length := by
rw [erase_eq_eraseP, length_eraseP_add_one h (decide_eq_true rfl)]
theorem map_erase [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Injective f) {a : α} (l : List α) :
map f (l.erase a) = (map f l).erase (f a) := by
have this : (a == ·) = (f a == f ·) := by ext b; simp [beq_eq_decide, finj.eq_iff]
rw [erase_eq_eraseP, erase_eq_eraseP, eraseP_map, this]; rfl
theorem map_foldl_erase [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Injective f) {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
map f (foldl List.erase l₁ l₂) = foldl (fun l a => l.erase (f a)) (map f l₁) l₂ := by
induction l₂ generalizing l₁ <;> [rfl; simp only [foldl_cons, map_erase finj, *]]
theorem erase_getElem [DecidableEq ι] {l : List ι} {i : ℕ} (hi : i < l.length) :
Perm (l.erase l[i]) (l.eraseIdx i) := by
induction l generalizing i with
| nil => simp
| cons a l IH =>
cases i with
| zero => simp
| succ i =>
have hi' : i < l.length := by simpa using hi
if ha : a = l[i] then
simpa [ha] using .trans (perm_cons_erase (getElem_mem _)) (.cons _ (IH hi'))
else
simpa [ha] using IH hi'
theorem length_eraseIdx_add_one {l : List ι} {i : ℕ} (h : i < l.length) :
(l.eraseIdx i).length + 1 = l.length := by
rw [length_eraseIdx]
split <;> omega
end Erase
/-! ### diff -/
section Diff
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
theorem map_diff [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Injective f) {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
map f (l₁.diff l₂) = (map f l₁).diff (map f l₂) := by
simp only [diff_eq_foldl, foldl_map, map_foldl_erase finj]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-10")]
alias erase_diff_erase_sublist_of_sublist := Sublist.erase_diff_erase_sublist
end Diff
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : List α)
theorem choose_spec (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(chooseX p l hp).property
theorem choose_mem (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).1
theorem choose_property (hp : ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).2
end Choose
/-! ### Forall -/
section Forall
variable {p q : α → Prop} {l : List α}
@[simp]
theorem forall_cons (p : α → Prop) (x : α) : ∀ l : List α, Forall p (x :: l) ↔ p x ∧ Forall p l
| [] => (and_iff_left_of_imp fun _ ↦ trivial).symm
| _ :: _ => Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem forall_append {p : α → Prop} : ∀ {xs ys : List α},
Forall p (xs ++ ys) ↔ Forall p xs ∧ Forall p ys
| [] => by simp
| _ :: _ => by simp [forall_append, and_assoc]
theorem forall_iff_forall_mem : ∀ {l : List α}, Forall p l ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, p x
| [] => (iff_true_intro <| forall_mem_nil _).symm
| x :: l => by rw [forall_mem_cons, forall_cons, forall_iff_forall_mem]
theorem Forall.imp (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∀ {l : List α}, Forall p l → Forall q l
| [] => id
| x :: l => by
simp only [forall_cons, and_imp]
rw [← and_imp]
exact And.imp (h x) (Forall.imp h)
@[simp]
theorem forall_map_iff {p : β → Prop} (f : α → β) : Forall p (l.map f) ↔ Forall (p ∘ f) l := by
induction l <;> simp [*]
instance (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] : DecidablePred (Forall p) := fun _ =>
decidable_of_iff' _ forall_iff_forall_mem
end Forall
/-! ### Miscellaneous lemmas -/
theorem get_attach (l : List α) (i) :
(l.attach.get i).1 = l.get ⟨i, length_attach (l := l) ▸ i.2⟩ := by simp
section Disjoint
/-- The images of disjoint lists under a partially defined map are disjoint -/
theorem disjoint_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : ∀ a : α, p a → β} {s t : List α}
(hs : ∀ a ∈ s, p a) (ht : ∀ a ∈ t, p a)
(hf : ∀ (a a' : α) (ha : p a) (ha' : p a'), f a ha = f a' ha' → a = a')
(h : Disjoint s t) :
Disjoint (s.pmap f hs) (t.pmap f ht) := by
simp only [Disjoint, mem_pmap]
rintro b ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ ⟨a', ha', ha''⟩
apply h ha
rwa [hf a a' (hs a ha) (ht a' ha') ha''.symm]
/-- The images of disjoint lists under an injective map are disjoint -/
theorem disjoint_map {f : α → β} {s t : List α} (hf : Function.Injective f)
(h : Disjoint s t) : Disjoint (s.map f) (t.map f) := by
rw [← pmap_eq_map (fun _ _ ↦ trivial), ← pmap_eq_map (fun _ _ ↦ trivial)]
exact disjoint_pmap _ _ (fun _ _ _ _ h' ↦ hf h') h
alias Disjoint.map := disjoint_map
theorem Disjoint.of_map {f : α → β} {s t : List α} (h : Disjoint (s.map f) (t.map f)) :
Disjoint s t := fun _a has hat ↦
h (mem_map_of_mem has) (mem_map_of_mem hat)
theorem Disjoint.map_iff {f : α → β} {s t : List α} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Disjoint (s.map f) (t.map f) ↔ Disjoint s t :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.of_map, fun h ↦ h.map hf⟩
theorem Perm.disjoint_left {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (p : List.Perm l₁ l₂) :
Disjoint l₁ l ↔ Disjoint l₂ l := by
simp_rw [List.disjoint_left, p.mem_iff]
theorem Perm.disjoint_right {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (p : List.Perm l₁ l₂) :
Disjoint l l₁ ↔ Disjoint l l₂ := by
simp_rw [List.disjoint_right, p.mem_iff]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_reverse_left {l₁ l₂ : List α} : Disjoint l₁.reverse l₂ ↔ Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
reverse_perm _ |>.disjoint_left
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_reverse_right {l₁ l₂ : List α} : Disjoint l₁ l₂.reverse ↔ Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
reverse_perm _ |>.disjoint_right
end Disjoint
section lookup
variable [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α]
lemma lookup_graph (f : α → β) {a : α} {as : List α} (h : a ∈ as) :
lookup a (as.map fun x => (x, f x)) = some (f a) := by
induction as with
| nil => exact (not_mem_nil h).elim
| cons a' as ih =>
by_cases ha : a = a'
· simp [ha, lookup_cons]
· simpa [lookup_cons, beq_false_of_ne ha] using ih (List.mem_of_ne_of_mem ha h)
end lookup
section range'
@[simp]
lemma range'_0 (a b : ℕ) :
range' a b 0 = replicate b a := by
induction b with
| zero => simp
| succ b ih => simp [range'_succ, ih, replicate_succ]
lemma left_le_of_mem_range' {a b s x : ℕ}
(hx : x ∈ List.range' a b s) : a ≤ x := by
obtain ⟨i, _, rfl⟩ := List.mem_range'.mp hx
exact le_add_right a (s * i)
end range'
end List
| Mathlib/Data/List/Basic.lean | 3,241 | 3,242 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Seminorm
import Mathlib.Data.NNReal.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Support
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Real
/-!
# Normed (semi)groups
In this file we define 10 classes:
* `Norm`, `NNNorm`: auxiliary classes endowing a type `α` with a function `norm : α → ℝ`
(notation: `‖x‖`) and `nnnorm : α → ℝ≥0` (notation: `‖x‖₊`), respectively;
* `Seminormed...Group`: A seminormed (additive) (commutative) group is an (additive) (commutative)
group with a norm and a compatible pseudometric space structure:
`∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖` or `∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖`, depending on the group operation.
* `Normed...Group`: A normed (additive) (commutative) group is an (additive) (commutative) group
with a norm and a compatible metric space structure.
We also prove basic properties of (semi)normed groups and provide some instances.
## Notes
The current convention `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` means that the distance is invariant under right
addition, but actions in mathlib are usually from the left. This means we might want to change it to
`dist x y = ‖-x + y‖`.
The normed group hierarchy would lend itself well to a mixin design (that is, having
`SeminormedGroup` and `SeminormedAddGroup` not extend `Group` and `AddGroup`), but we choose not
to for performance concerns.
## Tags
normed group
-/
variable {𝓕 α ι κ E F G : Type*}
open Filter Function Metric Bornology
open ENNReal Filter NNReal Uniformity Pointwise Topology
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `E` with a function `norm : E → ℝ` with notation `‖x‖`. This
class is designed to be extended in more interesting classes specifying the properties of the norm.
-/
@[notation_class]
class Norm (E : Type*) where
/-- the `ℝ`-valued norm function. -/
norm : E → ℝ
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `α` with a function `nnnorm : α → ℝ≥0` with notation `‖x‖₊`. -/
@[notation_class]
class NNNorm (E : Type*) where
/-- the `ℝ≥0`-valued norm function. -/
nnnorm : E → ℝ≥0
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `α` with a function `enorm : α → ℝ≥0∞` with notation `‖x‖ₑ`. -/
@[notation_class]
class ENorm (E : Type*) where
/-- the `ℝ≥0∞`-valued norm function. -/
enorm : E → ℝ≥0∞
export Norm (norm)
export NNNorm (nnnorm)
export ENorm (enorm)
@[inherit_doc] notation "‖" e "‖" => norm e
@[inherit_doc] notation "‖" e "‖₊" => nnnorm e
@[inherit_doc] notation "‖" e "‖ₑ" => enorm e
section ENorm
variable {E : Type*} [NNNorm E] {x : E} {r : ℝ≥0}
instance NNNorm.toENorm : ENorm E where enorm := (‖·‖₊ : E → ℝ≥0∞)
lemma enorm_eq_nnnorm (x : E) : ‖x‖ₑ = ‖x‖₊ := rfl
@[simp] lemma toNNReal_enorm (x : E) : ‖x‖ₑ.toNNReal = ‖x‖₊ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_le_enorm : r ≤ ‖x‖ₑ ↔ r ≤ ‖x‖₊ := by simp [enorm]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma enorm_le_coe : ‖x‖ₑ ≤ r ↔ ‖x‖₊ ≤ r := by simp [enorm]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_lt_enorm : r < ‖x‖ₑ ↔ r < ‖x‖₊ := by simp [enorm]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma enorm_lt_coe : ‖x‖ₑ < r ↔ ‖x‖₊ < r := by simp [enorm]
@[simp] lemma enorm_ne_top : ‖x‖ₑ ≠ ∞ := by simp [enorm]
@[simp] lemma enorm_lt_top : ‖x‖ₑ < ∞ := by simp [enorm]
end ENorm
/-- A type `E` equipped with a continuous map `‖·‖ₑ : E → ℝ≥0∞`
NB. We do not demand that the topology is somehow defined by the enorm:
for ℝ≥0∞ (the motivating example behind this definition), this is not true. -/
class ContinuousENorm (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E] extends ENorm E where
continuous_enorm : Continuous enorm
/-- An enormed monoid is an additive monoid endowed with a continuous enorm. -/
class ENormedAddMonoid (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E] extends ContinuousENorm E, AddMonoid E where
enorm_eq_zero : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ₑ = 0 ↔ x = 0
protected enorm_add_le : ∀ x y : E, ‖x + y‖ₑ ≤ ‖x‖ₑ + ‖y‖ₑ
/-- An enormed monoid is a monoid endowed with a continuous enorm. -/
@[to_additive]
class ENormedMonoid (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E] extends ContinuousENorm E, Monoid E where
enorm_eq_zero : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ₑ = 0 ↔ x = 1
enorm_mul_le : ∀ x y : E, ‖x * y‖ₑ ≤ ‖x‖ₑ + ‖y‖ₑ
/-- An enormed commutative monoid is an additive commutative monoid
endowed with a continuous enorm.
We don't have `ENormedAddCommMonoid` extend `EMetricSpace`, since the canonical instance `ℝ≥0∞`
is not an `EMetricSpace`. This is because `ℝ≥0∞` carries the order topology, which is distinct from
the topology coming from `edist`. -/
class ENormedAddCommMonoid (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E]
extends ENormedAddMonoid E, AddCommMonoid E where
/-- An enormed commutative monoid is a commutative monoid endowed with a continuous enorm. -/
@[to_additive]
class ENormedCommMonoid (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E] extends ENormedMonoid E, CommMonoid E where
/-- A seminormed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
class SeminormedAddGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddGroup E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
/-- A seminormed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a
pseudometric space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class SeminormedGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, Group E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
/-- A normed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` defines a
metric space structure. -/
class NormedAddGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
/-- A normed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a metric
space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class NormedGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, Group E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
/-- A seminormed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
class SeminormedAddCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddCommGroup E,
PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
/-- A seminormed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class SeminormedCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, CommGroup E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
/-- A normed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` defines a
metric space structure. -/
class NormedAddCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddCommGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
/-- A normed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a metric
space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class NormedCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, CommGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedGroup.toSeminormedGroup [NormedGroup E] : SeminormedGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedGroup E› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedCommGroup.toSeminormedCommGroup [NormedCommGroup E] :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedCommGroup E› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) SeminormedCommGroup.toSeminormedGroup [SeminormedCommGroup E] :
SeminormedGroup E :=
{ ‹SeminormedCommGroup E› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedCommGroup.toNormedGroup [NormedCommGroup E] : NormedGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedCommGroup E› with }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a `NormedGroup` from a `SeminormedGroup` satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1`. This
avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when declaring a `NormedGroup`
instance as a special case of a more general `SeminormedGroup` instance. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a `NormedAddGroup` from a `SeminormedAddGroup`
satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 0`. This avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace`
level when declaring a `NormedAddGroup` instance as a special case of a more general
`SeminormedAddGroup` instance."]
abbrev NormedGroup.ofSeparation [SeminormedGroup E] (h : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1) :
NormedGroup E where
dist_eq := ‹SeminormedGroup E›.dist_eq
toMetricSpace :=
{ eq_of_dist_eq_zero := fun hxy =>
div_eq_one.1 <| h _ <| (‹SeminormedGroup E›.dist_eq _ _).symm.trans hxy }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a `NormedCommGroup` from a `SeminormedCommGroup` satisfying
`∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1`. This avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when
declaring a `NormedCommGroup` instance as a special case of a more general `SeminormedCommGroup`
instance. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a `NormedAddCommGroup` from a
`SeminormedAddCommGroup` satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 0`. This avoids having to go back to the
`(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when declaring a `NormedAddCommGroup` instance as a special case
of a more general `SeminormedAddCommGroup` instance."]
abbrev NormedCommGroup.ofSeparation [SeminormedCommGroup E] (h : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ ‹SeminormedCommGroup E›, NormedGroup.ofSeparation h with }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant distance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant distance."]
abbrev SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [Group E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
SeminormedGroup E where
dist_eq x y := by
rw [h₁]; apply le_antisymm
· simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_inv_cancel y] using h₂ _ _ _
· simpa only [div_mul_cancel, one_mul] using h₂ (x / y) 1 y
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [Group E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
SeminormedGroup E where
dist_eq x y := by
rw [h₁]; apply le_antisymm
· simpa only [div_mul_cancel, one_mul] using h₂ (x / y) 1 y
· simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_inv_cancel y] using h₂ _ _ _
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant distance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant distance."]
abbrev NormedGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [Group E] [MetricSpace E] (h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1)
(h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) : NormedGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := eq_of_dist_eq_zero }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev NormedGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [Group E] [MetricSpace E] (h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1)
(h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) : NormedGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := eq_of_dist_eq_zero }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [MetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ NormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [MetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ NormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance and the
pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this instance
creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing
`UniformSpace` instance on `E`). -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance
and the pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this
instance creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly
existing `UniformSpace` instance on `E`)."]
abbrev GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedGroup [Group E] (f : GroupSeminorm E) : SeminormedGroup E where
dist x y := f (x / y)
norm := f
dist_eq _ _ := rfl
dist_self x := by simp only [div_self', map_one_eq_zero]
dist_triangle := le_map_div_add_map_div f
dist_comm := map_div_rev f
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance and the
pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this instance
creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing
`UniformSpace` instance on `E`). -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance
and the pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this
instance creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly
existing `UniformSpace` instance on `E`)."]
abbrev GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedCommGroup [CommGroup E] (f : GroupSeminorm E) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ f.toSeminormedGroup with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric space
structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad definitional
equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace` instance on
`E`). -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric
space structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad
definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace`
instance on `E`)."]
abbrev GroupNorm.toNormedGroup [Group E] (f : GroupNorm E) : NormedGroup E :=
{ f.toGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedGroup with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := fun h => div_eq_one.1 <| eq_one_of_map_eq_zero f h }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric space
structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad definitional
equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace` instance on
`E`). -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric
space structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad
definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace`
instance on `E`)."]
abbrev GroupNorm.toNormedCommGroup [CommGroup E] (f : GroupNorm E) : NormedCommGroup E :=
{ f.toNormedGroup with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
section SeminormedGroup
variable [SeminormedGroup E] [SeminormedGroup F] [SeminormedGroup G] {s : Set E}
{a a₁ a₂ b c : E} {r r₁ r₂ : ℝ}
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_eq_norm_div (a b : E) : dist a b = ‖a / b‖ :=
SeminormedGroup.dist_eq _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_eq_norm_div' (a b : E) : dist a b = ‖b / a‖ := by rw [dist_comm, dist_eq_norm_div]
alias dist_eq_norm := dist_eq_norm_sub
alias dist_eq_norm' := dist_eq_norm_sub'
@[to_additive of_forall_le_norm]
lemma DiscreteTopology.of_forall_le_norm' (hpos : 0 < r) (hr : ∀ x : E, x ≠ 1 → r ≤ ‖x‖) :
DiscreteTopology E :=
.of_forall_le_dist hpos fun x y hne ↦ by
simp only [dist_eq_norm_div]
exact hr _ (div_ne_one.2 hne)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_one_right (a : E) : dist a 1 = ‖a‖ := by rw [dist_eq_norm_div, div_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem inseparable_one_iff_norm {a : E} : Inseparable a 1 ↔ ‖a‖ = 0 := by
rw [Metric.inseparable_iff, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive]
lemma dist_one_left (a : E) : dist 1 a = ‖a‖ := by rw [dist_comm, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma dist_one : dist (1 : E) = norm := funext dist_one_left
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_rev (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖ = ‖b / a‖ := by
simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_comm a b
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_neg]
theorem norm_inv' (a : E) : ‖a⁻¹‖ = ‖a‖ := by simpa using norm_div_rev 1 a
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_abs_zsmul]
theorem norm_zpow_abs (a : E) (n : ℤ) : ‖a ^ |n|‖ = ‖a ^ n‖ := by
rcases le_total 0 n with hn | hn <;> simp [hn, abs_of_nonneg, abs_of_nonpos]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_natAbs_smul]
theorem norm_pow_natAbs (a : E) (n : ℤ) : ‖a ^ n.natAbs‖ = ‖a ^ n‖ := by
rw [← zpow_natCast, ← Int.abs_eq_natAbs, norm_zpow_abs]
@[to_additive norm_isUnit_zsmul]
theorem norm_zpow_isUnit (a : E) {n : ℤ} (hn : IsUnit n) : ‖a ^ n‖ = ‖a‖ := by
rw [← norm_pow_natAbs, Int.isUnit_iff_natAbs_eq.mp hn, pow_one]
@[simp]
theorem norm_units_zsmul {E : Type*} [SeminormedAddGroup E] (n : ℤˣ) (a : E) : ‖n • a‖ = ‖a‖ :=
norm_isUnit_zsmul a n.isUnit
open scoped symmDiff in
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → E) (x : α) :
dist (s.mulIndicator f x) (t.mulIndicator f x) = ‖(s ∆ t).mulIndicator f x‖ := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_div, Set.apply_mulIndicator_symmDiff norm_inv']
/-- **Triangle inequality** for the norm. -/
@[to_additive norm_add_le "**Triangle inequality** for the norm."]
theorem norm_mul_le' (a b : E) : ‖a * b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a 1 b⁻¹
/-- **Triangle inequality** for the norm. -/
@[to_additive norm_add_le_of_le "**Triangle inequality** for the norm."]
theorem norm_mul_le_of_le' (h₁ : ‖a₁‖ ≤ r₁) (h₂ : ‖a₂‖ ≤ r₂) : ‖a₁ * a₂‖ ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(norm_mul_le' a₁ a₂).trans <| add_le_add h₁ h₂
/-- **Triangle inequality** for the norm. -/
@[to_additive norm_add₃_le "**Triangle inequality** for the norm."]
lemma norm_mul₃_le' : ‖a * b * c‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ + ‖c‖ := norm_mul_le_of_le' (norm_mul_le' _ _) le_rfl
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_div_le_norm_div_add_norm_div (a b c : E) : ‖a / c‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ + ‖b / c‖ := by
simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a b c
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_nonneg]
theorem norm_nonneg' (a : E) : 0 ≤ ‖a‖ := by
rw [← dist_one_right]
exact dist_nonneg
attribute [bound] norm_nonneg
@[to_additive (attr := simp) abs_norm]
theorem abs_norm' (z : E) : |‖z‖| = ‖z‖ := abs_of_nonneg <| norm_nonneg' _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_zero]
theorem norm_one' : ‖(1 : E)‖ = 0 := by rw [← dist_one_right, dist_self]
@[to_additive]
theorem ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero : ‖a‖ ≠ 0 → a ≠ 1 :=
mt <| by
rintro rfl
exact norm_one'
@[to_additive (attr := nontriviality) norm_of_subsingleton]
theorem norm_of_subsingleton' [Subsingleton E] (a : E) : ‖a‖ = 0 := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim a 1, norm_one']
@[to_additive zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq]
theorem zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq' (x : E) : 0 < 1 + ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
positivity
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_le (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a 1 b
attribute [bound] norm_sub_le
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_le_of_le {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (H₁ : ‖a₁‖ ≤ r₁) (H₂ : ‖a₂‖ ≤ r₂) : ‖a₁ / a₂‖ ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(norm_div_le a₁ a₂).trans <| add_le_add H₁ H₂
@[to_additive dist_le_norm_add_norm]
theorem dist_le_norm_add_norm' (a b : E) : dist a b ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_div]
apply norm_div_le
@[to_additive abs_norm_sub_norm_le]
theorem abs_norm_sub_norm_le' (a b : E) : |‖a‖ - ‖b‖| ≤ ‖a / b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using abs_dist_sub_le a b 1
@[to_additive norm_sub_norm_le]
theorem norm_sub_norm_le' (a b : E) : ‖a‖ - ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ :=
(le_abs_self _).trans (abs_norm_sub_norm_le' a b)
@[to_additive (attr := bound)]
theorem norm_sub_le_norm_mul (a b : E) : ‖a‖ - ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a * b‖ := by
simpa using norm_mul_le' (a * b) (b⁻¹)
@[to_additive dist_norm_norm_le]
theorem dist_norm_norm_le' (a b : E) : dist ‖a‖ ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ :=
abs_norm_sub_norm_le' a b
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' (u v : E) : ‖u‖ ≤ ‖v‖ + ‖u / v‖ := by
rw [add_comm]
refine (norm_mul_le' _ _).trans_eq' ?_
rw [div_mul_cancel]
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_le_norm_add_norm_div (u v : E) : ‖v‖ ≤ ‖u‖ + ‖u / v‖ := by
rw [norm_div_rev]
exact norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' v u
alias norm_le_insert' := norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub'
alias norm_le_insert := norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_le_mul_norm_add (u v : E) : ‖u‖ ≤ ‖u * v‖ + ‖v‖ :=
calc
‖u‖ = ‖u * v / v‖ := by rw [mul_div_cancel_right]
_ ≤ ‖u * v‖ + ‖v‖ := norm_div_le _ _
/-- An analogue of `norm_le_mul_norm_add` for the multiplication from the left. -/
@[to_additive "An analogue of `norm_le_add_norm_add` for the addition from the left."]
theorem norm_le_mul_norm_add' (u v : E) : ‖v‖ ≤ ‖u * v‖ + ‖u‖ :=
calc
‖v‖ = ‖u⁻¹ * (u * v)‖ := by rw [← mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel, one_mul]
_ ≤ ‖u⁻¹‖ + ‖u * v‖ := norm_mul_le' u⁻¹ (u * v)
_ = ‖u * v‖ + ‖u‖ := by rw [norm_inv', add_comm]
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_mul_eq_norm_right {x : E} (y : E) (h : ‖x‖ = 0) : ‖x * y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· simpa [h] using norm_mul_le' x y
· simpa [h] using norm_le_mul_norm_add' x y
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_mul_eq_norm_left (x : E) {y : E} (h : ‖y‖ = 0) : ‖x * y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· simpa [h] using norm_mul_le' x y
· simpa [h] using norm_le_mul_norm_add x y
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_div_eq_norm_right {x : E} (y : E) (h : ‖x‖ = 0) : ‖x / y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· simpa [h] using norm_div_le x y
· simpa [h, norm_div_rev x y] using norm_sub_norm_le' y x
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_div_eq_norm_left (x : E) {y : E} (h : ‖y‖ = 0) : ‖x / y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· simpa [h] using norm_div_le x y
· simpa [h] using norm_sub_norm_le' x y
@[to_additive ball_eq]
theorem ball_eq' (y : E) (ε : ℝ) : ball y ε = { x | ‖x / y‖ < ε } :=
Set.ext fun a => by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem ball_one_eq (r : ℝ) : ball (1 : E) r = { x | ‖x‖ < r } :=
Set.ext fun a => by simp
@[to_additive mem_ball_iff_norm]
theorem mem_ball_iff_norm'' : b ∈ ball a r ↔ ‖b / a‖ < r := by rw [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive mem_ball_iff_norm']
theorem mem_ball_iff_norm''' : b ∈ ball a r ↔ ‖a / b‖ < r := by rw [mem_ball', dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_ball_one_iff : a ∈ ball (1 : E) r ↔ ‖a‖ < r := by rw [mem_ball, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive mem_closedBall_iff_norm]
theorem mem_closedBall_iff_norm'' : b ∈ closedBall a r ↔ ‖b / a‖ ≤ r := by
rw [mem_closedBall, dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_closedBall_one_iff : a ∈ closedBall (1 : E) r ↔ ‖a‖ ≤ r := by
rw [mem_closedBall, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive mem_closedBall_iff_norm']
theorem mem_closedBall_iff_norm''' : b ∈ closedBall a r ↔ ‖a / b‖ ≤ r := by
rw [mem_closedBall', dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive norm_le_of_mem_closedBall]
theorem norm_le_of_mem_closedBall' (h : b ∈ closedBall a r) : ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + r :=
(norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' _ _).trans <| add_le_add_left (by rwa [← dist_eq_norm_div]) _
@[to_additive norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le]
theorem norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le' : dist a b ≤ r → ‖a‖ ≤ ‖b‖ + r :=
norm_le_of_mem_closedBall'
@[to_additive norm_lt_of_mem_ball]
theorem norm_lt_of_mem_ball' (h : b ∈ ball a r) : ‖b‖ < ‖a‖ + r :=
(norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' _ _).trans_lt <| add_lt_add_left (by rwa [← dist_eq_norm_div]) _
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_sub_norm_div_le_norm_div (u v w : E) : ‖u / w‖ - ‖v / w‖ ≤ ‖u / v‖ := by
simpa only [div_div_div_cancel_right] using norm_sub_norm_le' (u / w) (v / w)
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1001) mem_sphere_iff_norm]
-- Porting note: increase priority so the left-hand side doesn't reduce
theorem mem_sphere_iff_norm' : b ∈ sphere a r ↔ ‖b / a‖ = r := by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive] -- `simp` can prove this
theorem mem_sphere_one_iff_norm : a ∈ sphere (1 : E) r ↔ ‖a‖ = r := by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_eq_of_mem_sphere]
theorem norm_eq_of_mem_sphere' (x : sphere (1 : E) r) : ‖(x : E)‖ = r :=
mem_sphere_one_iff_norm.mp x.2
@[to_additive]
theorem ne_one_of_mem_sphere (hr : r ≠ 0) (x : sphere (1 : E) r) : (x : E) ≠ 1 :=
ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero <| by rwa [norm_eq_of_mem_sphere' x]
@[to_additive ne_zero_of_mem_unit_sphere]
theorem ne_one_of_mem_unit_sphere (x : sphere (1 : E) 1) : (x : E) ≠ 1 :=
ne_one_of_mem_sphere one_ne_zero _
variable (E)
/-- The norm of a seminormed group as a group seminorm. -/
@[to_additive "The norm of a seminormed group as an additive group seminorm."]
def normGroupSeminorm : GroupSeminorm E :=
⟨norm, norm_one', norm_mul_le', norm_inv'⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_normGroupSeminorm : ⇑(normGroupSeminorm E) = norm :=
rfl
variable {E}
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_one {f : α → E} {l : Filter α} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝 1) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ < ε :=
Metric.tendsto_nhds.trans <| by simp only [dist_one_right]
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_nhds {f : E → F} {x : E} {y : F} :
Tendsto f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x', ‖x' / x‖ < δ → ‖f x' / y‖ < ε := by
simp_rw [Metric.tendsto_nhds_nhds, dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.nhds_basis_norm_lt (x : E) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { y | ‖y / x‖ < ε } := by
simp_rw [← ball_eq']
exact Metric.nhds_basis_ball
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.nhds_one_basis_norm_lt :
(𝓝 (1 : E)).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { y | ‖y‖ < ε } := by
convert NormedCommGroup.nhds_basis_norm_lt (1 : E)
simp
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.uniformity_basis_dist :
(𝓤 E).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { p : E × E | ‖p.fst / p.snd‖ < ε } := by
convert Metric.uniformity_basis_dist (α := E) using 1
simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
open Finset
variable [FunLike 𝓕 E F]
section NNNorm
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) SeminormedGroup.toNNNorm : NNNorm E :=
⟨fun a => ⟨‖a‖, norm_nonneg' a⟩⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast) coe_nnnorm]
theorem coe_nnnorm' (a : E) : (‖a‖₊ : ℝ) = ‖a‖ := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) coe_comp_nnnorm]
theorem coe_comp_nnnorm' : (toReal : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) ∘ (nnnorm : E → ℝ≥0) = norm :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_toNNReal]
theorem norm_toNNReal' : ‖a‖.toNNReal = ‖a‖₊ :=
@Real.toNNReal_coe ‖a‖₊
@[to_additive (attr := simp) toReal_enorm]
lemma toReal_enorm' (x : E) : ‖x‖ₑ.toReal = ‖x‖ := by simp [enorm]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) ofReal_norm]
lemma ofReal_norm' (x : E) : .ofReal ‖x‖ = ‖x‖ₑ := by
simp [enorm, ENNReal.ofReal, Real.toNNReal, nnnorm]
@[to_additive enorm_eq_iff_norm_eq]
theorem enorm'_eq_iff_norm_eq {x : E} {y : F} : ‖x‖ₑ = ‖y‖ₑ ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
simp only [← ofReal_norm']
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ by congr⟩
exact (Real.toNNReal_eq_toNNReal_iff (norm_nonneg' _) (norm_nonneg' _)).mp (ENNReal.coe_inj.mp h)
@[to_additive enorm_le_iff_norm_le]
theorem enorm'_le_iff_norm_le {x : E} {y : F} : ‖x‖ₑ ≤ ‖y‖ₑ ↔ ‖x‖ ≤ ‖y‖ := by
simp only [← ofReal_norm']
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ by gcongr⟩
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff (norm_nonneg' _)] at h
exact h
@[to_additive]
theorem nndist_eq_nnnorm_div (a b : E) : nndist a b = ‖a / b‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_eq_norm_div _ _
alias nndist_eq_nnnorm := nndist_eq_nnnorm_sub
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem nndist_one_right (a : E) : nndist a 1 = ‖a‖₊ := by simp [nndist_eq_nnnorm_div]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma edist_one_right (a : E) : edist a 1 = ‖a‖ₑ := by simp [edist_nndist, nndist_one_right, enorm]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_zero]
theorem nnnorm_one' : ‖(1 : E)‖₊ = 0 := NNReal.eq norm_one'
@[to_additive]
theorem ne_one_of_nnnorm_ne_zero {a : E} : ‖a‖₊ ≠ 0 → a ≠ 1 :=
mt <| by
rintro rfl
exact nnnorm_one'
@[to_additive nnnorm_add_le]
theorem nnnorm_mul_le' (a b : E) : ‖a * b‖₊ ≤ ‖a‖₊ + ‖b‖₊ :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| norm_mul_le' a b
@[to_additive norm_nsmul_le]
lemma norm_pow_le_mul_norm : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ‖a ^ n‖ ≤ n * ‖a‖
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by simpa [pow_succ, add_mul] using norm_mul_le_of_le' norm_pow_le_mul_norm le_rfl
@[to_additive nnnorm_nsmul_le]
lemma nnnorm_pow_le_mul_norm {n : ℕ} : ‖a ^ n‖₊ ≤ n * ‖a‖₊ := by
simpa only [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.coe_mul, NNReal.coe_natCast] using norm_pow_le_mul_norm
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_neg]
theorem nnnorm_inv' (a : E) : ‖a⁻¹‖₊ = ‖a‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_inv' a
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_abs_zsmul]
theorem nnnorm_zpow_abs (a : E) (n : ℤ) : ‖a ^ |n|‖₊ = ‖a ^ n‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_zpow_abs a n
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_natAbs_smul]
theorem nnnorm_pow_natAbs (a : E) (n : ℤ) : ‖a ^ n.natAbs‖₊ = ‖a ^ n‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_pow_natAbs a n
@[to_additive nnnorm_isUnit_zsmul]
theorem nnnorm_zpow_isUnit (a : E) {n : ℤ} (hn : IsUnit n) : ‖a ^ n‖₊ = ‖a‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_zpow_isUnit a hn
@[simp]
theorem nnnorm_units_zsmul {E : Type*} [SeminormedAddGroup E] (n : ℤˣ) (a : E) : ‖n • a‖₊ = ‖a‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_isUnit_zsmul a n.isUnit
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem nndist_one_left (a : E) : nndist 1 a = ‖a‖₊ := by simp [nndist_eq_nnnorm_div]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem edist_one_left (a : E) : edist 1 a = ‖a‖₊ := by
rw [edist_nndist, nndist_one_left]
open scoped symmDiff in
@[to_additive]
theorem nndist_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → E) (x : α) :
nndist (s.mulIndicator f x) (t.mulIndicator f x) = ‖(s ∆ t).mulIndicator f x‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_mulIndicator s t f x
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_div_le (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖₊ ≤ ‖a‖₊ + ‖b‖₊ :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| norm_div_le _ _
@[to_additive]
lemma enorm_div_le : ‖a / b‖ₑ ≤ ‖a‖ₑ + ‖b‖ₑ := by
simpa [enorm, ← ENNReal.coe_add] using nnnorm_div_le a b
@[to_additive nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le]
theorem nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le' (a b : E) : nndist ‖a‖₊ ‖b‖₊ ≤ ‖a / b‖₊ :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| dist_norm_norm_le' a b
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_div (a b : E) : ‖b‖₊ ≤ ‖a‖₊ + ‖a / b‖₊ :=
norm_le_norm_add_norm_div _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_div' (a b : E) : ‖a‖₊ ≤ ‖b‖₊ + ‖a / b‖₊ :=
norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' _ _
alias nnnorm_le_insert' := nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_sub'
alias nnnorm_le_insert := nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_add (a b : E) : ‖a‖₊ ≤ ‖a * b‖₊ + ‖b‖₊ :=
norm_le_mul_norm_add _ _
/-- An analogue of `nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_add` for the multiplication from the left. -/
@[to_additive "An analogue of `nnnorm_le_add_nnnorm_add` for the addition from the left."]
theorem nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_add' (a b : E) : ‖b‖₊ ≤ ‖a * b‖₊ + ‖a‖₊ :=
norm_le_mul_norm_add' _ _
@[to_additive]
lemma nnnorm_mul_eq_nnnorm_right {x : E} (y : E) (h : ‖x‖₊ = 0) : ‖x * y‖₊ = ‖y‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_mul_eq_norm_right _ <| congr_arg NNReal.toReal h
@[to_additive]
lemma nnnorm_mul_eq_nnnorm_left (x : E) {y : E} (h : ‖y‖₊ = 0) : ‖x * y‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_mul_eq_norm_left _ <| congr_arg NNReal.toReal h
@[to_additive]
lemma nnnorm_div_eq_nnnorm_right {x : E} (y : E) (h : ‖x‖₊ = 0) : ‖x / y‖₊ = ‖y‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_div_eq_norm_right _ <| congr_arg NNReal.toReal h
@[to_additive]
lemma nnnorm_div_eq_nnnorm_left (x : E) {y : E} (h : ‖y‖₊ = 0) : ‖x / y‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_div_eq_norm_left _ <| congr_arg NNReal.toReal h
/-- The non negative norm seen as an `ENNReal` and then as a `Real` is equal to the norm. -/
@[to_additive toReal_coe_nnnorm "The non negative norm seen as an `ENNReal` and
then as a `Real` is equal to the norm."]
theorem toReal_coe_nnnorm' (a : E) : (‖a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞).toReal = ‖a‖ := rfl
open scoped symmDiff in
@[to_additive]
theorem edist_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → E) (x : α) :
edist (s.mulIndicator f x) (t.mulIndicator f x) = ‖(s ∆ t).mulIndicator f x‖₊ := by
rw [edist_nndist, nndist_mulIndicator]
end NNNorm
section ENorm
@[to_additive (attr := simp) enorm_zero]
lemma enorm_one' {E : Type*} [TopologicalSpace E] [ENormedMonoid E] : ‖(1 : E)‖ₑ = 0 := by
rw [ENormedMonoid.enorm_eq_zero]
@[to_additive exists_enorm_lt]
lemma exists_enorm_lt' (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E] [ENormedMonoid E]
[hbot : NeBot (𝓝[≠] (1 : E))] {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ 0) : ∃ x ≠ (1 : E), ‖x‖ₑ < c :=
frequently_iff_neBot.mpr hbot |>.and_eventually
(ContinuousENorm.continuous_enorm.tendsto' 1 0 (by simp) |>.eventually_lt_const hc.bot_lt)
|>.exists
@[to_additive (attr := simp) enorm_neg]
lemma enorm_inv' (a : E) : ‖a⁻¹‖ₑ = ‖a‖ₑ := by simp [enorm]
@[to_additive ofReal_norm_eq_enorm]
lemma ofReal_norm_eq_enorm' (a : E) : .ofReal ‖a‖ = ‖a‖ₑ := ENNReal.ofReal_eq_coe_nnreal _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm := ofReal_norm_eq_enorm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm' := ofReal_norm_eq_enorm'
instance : ENorm ℝ≥0∞ where
enorm x := x
@[simp] lemma enorm_eq_self (x : ℝ≥0∞) : ‖x‖ₑ = x := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem edist_eq_enorm_div (a b : E) : edist a b = ‖a / b‖ₑ := by
rw [edist_dist, dist_eq_norm_div, ofReal_norm_eq_enorm']
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_sub := edist_eq_enorm_sub
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_div := edist_eq_enorm_div
@[to_additive]
theorem edist_one_eq_enorm (x : E) : edist x 1 = ‖x‖ₑ := by rw [edist_eq_enorm_div, div_one]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias edist_eq_coe_nnnorm := edist_zero_eq_enorm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias edist_eq_coe_nnnorm' := edist_one_eq_enorm
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_emetric_ball_one_iff {r : ℝ≥0∞} : a ∈ EMetric.ball 1 r ↔ ‖a‖ₑ < r := by
rw [EMetric.mem_ball, edist_one_eq_enorm]
end ENorm
section ContinuousENorm
variable {E : Type*} [TopologicalSpace E] [ContinuousENorm E]
@[continuity, fun_prop]
lemma continuous_enorm : Continuous fun a : E ↦ ‖a‖ₑ := ContinuousENorm.continuous_enorm
variable {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] {f : X → E} {s : Set X} {a : X}
@[fun_prop]
lemma Continuous.enorm : Continuous f → Continuous (‖f ·‖ₑ) :=
continuous_enorm.comp
lemma ContinuousAt.enorm {a : X} (h : ContinuousAt f a) : ContinuousAt (‖f ·‖ₑ) a := by fun_prop
@[fun_prop]
lemma ContinuousWithinAt.enorm {s : Set X} {a : X} (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s a) :
ContinuousWithinAt (‖f ·‖ₑ) s a :=
(ContinuousENorm.continuous_enorm.continuousWithinAt).comp (t := Set.univ) h
(fun _ _ ↦ by trivial)
@[fun_prop]
lemma ContinuousOn.enorm (h : ContinuousOn f s) : ContinuousOn (‖f ·‖ₑ) s :=
(ContinuousENorm.continuous_enorm.continuousOn).comp (t := Set.univ) h <| Set.mapsTo_univ _ _
end ContinuousENorm
section ENormedMonoid
variable {E : Type*} [TopologicalSpace E] [ENormedMonoid E]
@[to_additive enorm_add_le]
lemma enorm_mul_le' (a b : E) : ‖a * b‖ₑ ≤ ‖a‖ₑ + ‖b‖ₑ := ENormedMonoid.enorm_mul_le a b
@[to_additive (attr := simp) enorm_eq_zero]
lemma enorm_eq_zero' {a : E} : ‖a‖ₑ = 0 ↔ a = 1 := by
simp [enorm, ENormedMonoid.enorm_eq_zero]
@[to_additive enorm_ne_zero]
lemma enorm_ne_zero' {a : E} : ‖a‖ₑ ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 1 :=
enorm_eq_zero'.ne
@[to_additive (attr := simp) enorm_pos]
lemma enorm_pos' {a : E} : 0 < ‖a‖ₑ ↔ a ≠ 1 :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans enorm_ne_zero'
end ENormedMonoid
instance : ENormedAddCommMonoid ℝ≥0∞ where
continuous_enorm := continuous_id
enorm_eq_zero := by simp
enorm_add_le := by simp
open Set in
@[to_additive]
lemma SeminormedGroup.disjoint_nhds (x : E) (f : Filter E) :
Disjoint (𝓝 x) f ↔ ∃ δ > 0, ∀ᶠ y in f, δ ≤ ‖y / x‖ := by
simp [NormedCommGroup.nhds_basis_norm_lt x |>.disjoint_iff_left, compl_setOf, eventually_iff]
@[to_additive]
lemma SeminormedGroup.disjoint_nhds_one (f : Filter E) :
Disjoint (𝓝 1) f ↔ ∃ δ > 0, ∀ᶠ y in f, δ ≤ ‖y‖ := by
simpa using disjoint_nhds 1 f
end SeminormedGroup
section Induced
variable (E F)
variable [FunLike 𝓕 E F]
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- A group homomorphism from a `Group` to a `SeminormedGroup` induces a `SeminormedGroup`
structure on the domain. -/
@[to_additive "A group homomorphism from an `AddGroup` to a
`SeminormedAddGroup` induces a `SeminormedAddGroup` structure on the domain."]
abbrev SeminormedGroup.induced [Group E] [SeminormedGroup F] [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) :
SeminormedGroup E :=
{ PseudoMetricSpace.induced f toPseudoMetricSpace with
norm := fun x => ‖f x‖
dist_eq := fun x y => by simp only [map_div, ← dist_eq_norm_div]; rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- A group homomorphism from a `CommGroup` to a `SeminormedGroup` induces a
`SeminormedCommGroup` structure on the domain. -/
@[to_additive "A group homomorphism from an `AddCommGroup` to a
`SeminormedAddGroup` induces a `SeminormedAddCommGroup` structure on the domain."]
abbrev SeminormedCommGroup.induced
[CommGroup E] [SeminormedGroup F] [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.induced E F f with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances].
/-- An injective group homomorphism from a `Group` to a `NormedGroup` induces a `NormedGroup`
structure on the domain. -/
@[to_additive "An injective group homomorphism from an `AddGroup` to a
`NormedAddGroup` induces a `NormedAddGroup` structure on the domain."]
abbrev NormedGroup.induced
[Group E] [NormedGroup F] [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) (h : Injective f) :
NormedGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.induced E F f, MetricSpace.induced f h _ with }
-- See note [reducible non-instances].
/-- An injective group homomorphism from a `CommGroup` to a `NormedGroup` induces a
`NormedCommGroup` structure on the domain. -/
@[to_additive "An injective group homomorphism from a `CommGroup` to a
`NormedCommGroup` induces a `NormedCommGroup` structure on the domain."]
abbrev NormedCommGroup.induced [CommGroup E] [NormedGroup F] [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕)
(h : Injective f) : NormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.induced E F f, MetricSpace.induced f h _ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
end Induced
namespace Real
variable {r : ℝ}
instance norm : Norm ℝ where
norm r := |r|
@[simp]
theorem norm_eq_abs (r : ℝ) : ‖r‖ = |r| :=
rfl
instance normedAddCommGroup : NormedAddCommGroup ℝ :=
⟨fun _r _y => rfl⟩
theorem norm_of_nonneg (hr : 0 ≤ r) : ‖r‖ = r :=
abs_of_nonneg hr
theorem norm_of_nonpos (hr : r ≤ 0) : ‖r‖ = -r :=
abs_of_nonpos hr
theorem le_norm_self (r : ℝ) : r ≤ ‖r‖ :=
le_abs_self r
@[simp 1100] lemma norm_natCast (n : ℕ) : ‖(n : ℝ)‖ = n := abs_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg
@[simp 1100] lemma nnnorm_natCast (n : ℕ) : ‖(n : ℝ)‖₊ = n := NNReal.eq <| norm_natCast _
@[simp 1100] lemma enorm_natCast (n : ℕ) : ‖(n : ℝ)‖ₑ = n := by simp [enorm]
@[simp 1100] lemma norm_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
‖(ofNat(n) : ℝ)‖ = ofNat(n) := norm_natCast n
@[simp 1100] lemma nnnorm_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
‖(ofNat(n) : ℝ)‖₊ = ofNat(n) := nnnorm_natCast n
lemma norm_two : ‖(2 : ℝ)‖ = 2 := abs_of_pos zero_lt_two
lemma nnnorm_two : ‖(2 : ℝ)‖₊ = 2 := NNReal.eq <| by simp
@[simp 1100, norm_cast]
lemma norm_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : ‖(q : ℝ)‖ = q := norm_of_nonneg q.cast_nonneg
@[simp 1100, norm_cast]
lemma nnnorm_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : ‖(q : ℝ)‖₊ = q := by simp [nnnorm, -norm_eq_abs]
theorem nnnorm_of_nonneg (hr : 0 ≤ r) : ‖r‖₊ = ⟨r, hr⟩ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_of_nonneg hr
lemma enorm_of_nonneg (hr : 0 ≤ r) : ‖r‖ₑ = .ofReal r := by
simp [enorm, nnnorm_of_nonneg hr, ENNReal.ofReal, toNNReal, hr]
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_abs (r : ℝ) : ‖|r|‖₊ = ‖r‖₊ := by simp [nnnorm]
@[simp] lemma enorm_abs (r : ℝ) : ‖|r|‖ₑ = ‖r‖ₑ := by simp [enorm]
theorem enorm_eq_ofReal (hr : 0 ≤ r) : ‖r‖ₑ = .ofReal r := by
rw [← ofReal_norm_eq_enorm, norm_of_nonneg hr]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias ennnorm_eq_ofReal := enorm_eq_ofReal
theorem enorm_eq_ofReal_abs (r : ℝ) : ‖r‖ₑ = ENNReal.ofReal |r| := by
rw [← enorm_eq_ofReal (abs_nonneg _), enorm_abs]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias ennnorm_eq_ofReal_abs := enorm_eq_ofReal_abs
theorem toNNReal_eq_nnnorm_of_nonneg (hr : 0 ≤ r) : r.toNNReal = ‖r‖₊ := by
rw [Real.toNNReal_of_nonneg hr]
ext
rw [coe_mk, coe_nnnorm r, Real.norm_eq_abs r, abs_of_nonneg hr]
-- Porting note: this is due to the change from `Subtype.val` to `NNReal.toReal` for the coercion
theorem ofReal_le_enorm (r : ℝ) : ENNReal.ofReal r ≤ ‖r‖ₑ := by
rw [enorm_eq_ofReal_abs]; gcongr; exact le_abs_self _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias ofReal_le_ennnorm := ofReal_le_enorm
end Real
namespace NNReal
instance : NNNorm ℝ≥0 where
nnnorm x := x
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_eq_self (x : ℝ≥0) : ‖x‖₊ = x := rfl
end NNReal
section SeminormedCommGroup
variable [SeminormedCommGroup E] [SeminormedCommGroup F] {a b : E} {r : ℝ}
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_inv (x y : E) : dist x⁻¹ y = dist x y⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [dist_eq_norm_div, ← norm_inv' (x⁻¹ / y), inv_div, div_inv_eq_mul, mul_comm]
theorem norm_multiset_sum_le {E} [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] (m : Multiset E) :
‖m.sum‖ ≤ (m.map fun x => ‖x‖).sum :=
m.le_sum_of_subadditive norm norm_zero norm_add_le
@[to_additive existing]
theorem norm_multiset_prod_le (m : Multiset E) : ‖m.prod‖ ≤ (m.map fun x => ‖x‖).sum := by
rw [← Multiplicative.ofAdd_le, ofAdd_multiset_prod, Multiset.map_map]
refine Multiset.le_prod_of_submultiplicative (Multiplicative.ofAdd ∘ norm) ?_ (fun x y => ?_) _
· simp only [comp_apply, norm_one', ofAdd_zero]
· exact norm_mul_le' x y
@[bound]
theorem norm_sum_le {ι E} [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) :
‖∑ i ∈ s, f i‖ ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, ‖f i‖ :=
s.le_sum_of_subadditive norm norm_zero norm_add_le f
@[to_additive existing]
theorem norm_prod_le (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) : ‖∏ i ∈ s, f i‖ ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, ‖f i‖ := by
rw [← Multiplicative.ofAdd_le, ofAdd_sum]
refine Finset.le_prod_of_submultiplicative (Multiplicative.ofAdd ∘ norm) ?_ (fun x y => ?_) _ _
· simp only [comp_apply, norm_one', ofAdd_zero]
· exact norm_mul_le' x y
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_prod_le_of_le (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → E} {n : ι → ℝ} (h : ∀ b ∈ s, ‖f b‖ ≤ n b) :
‖∏ b ∈ s, f b‖ ≤ ∑ b ∈ s, n b :=
(norm_prod_le s f).trans <| Finset.sum_le_sum h
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_prod_prod_le_of_le (s : Finset ι) {f a : ι → E} {d : ι → ℝ}
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, dist (f b) (a b) ≤ d b) :
dist (∏ b ∈ s, f b) (∏ b ∈ s, a b) ≤ ∑ b ∈ s, d b := by
simp only [dist_eq_norm_div, ← Finset.prod_div_distrib] at *
exact norm_prod_le_of_le s h
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_prod_prod_le (s : Finset ι) (f a : ι → E) :
dist (∏ b ∈ s, f b) (∏ b ∈ s, a b) ≤ ∑ b ∈ s, dist (f b) (a b) :=
dist_prod_prod_le_of_le s fun _ _ => le_rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_ball_iff_norm : a * b ∈ ball a r ↔ ‖b‖ < r := by
rw [mem_ball_iff_norm'', mul_div_cancel_left]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_closedBall_iff_norm : a * b ∈ closedBall a r ↔ ‖b‖ ≤ r := by
rw [mem_closedBall_iff_norm'', mul_div_cancel_left]
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1001)]
-- Porting note: increase priority so that the left-hand side doesn't simplify
theorem preimage_mul_ball (a b : E) (r : ℝ) : (b * ·) ⁻¹' ball a r = ball (a / b) r := by
ext c
simp only [dist_eq_norm_div, Set.mem_preimage, mem_ball, div_div_eq_mul_div, mul_comm]
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1001)]
-- Porting note: increase priority so that the left-hand side doesn't simplify
theorem preimage_mul_closedBall (a b : E) (r : ℝ) :
(b * ·) ⁻¹' closedBall a r = closedBall (a / b) r := by
ext c
simp only [dist_eq_norm_div, Set.mem_preimage, mem_closedBall, div_div_eq_mul_div, mul_comm]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem preimage_mul_sphere (a b : E) (r : ℝ) : (b * ·) ⁻¹' sphere a r = sphere (a / b) r := by
ext c
simp only [Set.mem_preimage, mem_sphere_iff_norm', div_div_eq_mul_div, mul_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_mem_closedBall {n : ℕ} (h : a ∈ closedBall b r) :
a ^ n ∈ closedBall (b ^ n) (n • r) := by
simp only [mem_closedBall, dist_eq_norm_div, ← div_pow] at h ⊢
refine norm_pow_le_mul_norm.trans ?_
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left h n.cast_nonneg
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_mem_ball {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (h : a ∈ ball b r) : a ^ n ∈ ball (b ^ n) (n • r) := by
simp only [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm_div, ← div_pow] at h ⊢
refine lt_of_le_of_lt norm_pow_le_mul_norm ?_
replace hn : 0 < (n : ℝ) := by norm_cast
rw [nsmul_eq_mul]
nlinarith
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_closedBall_mul_iff {c : E} : a * c ∈ closedBall (b * c) r ↔ a ∈ closedBall b r := by
simp only [mem_closedBall, dist_eq_norm_div, mul_div_mul_right_eq_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_ball_mul_iff {c : E} : a * c ∈ ball (b * c) r ↔ a ∈ ball b r := by
simp only [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm_div, mul_div_mul_right_eq_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_closedBall'' : a • closedBall b r = closedBall (a • b) r := by
ext
simp [mem_closedBall, Set.mem_smul_set, dist_eq_norm_div, div_eq_inv_mul, ←
eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_ball'' : a • ball b r = ball (a • b) r := by
ext
simp [mem_ball, Set.mem_smul_set, dist_eq_norm_div, _root_.div_eq_inv_mul,
← eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_multiset_prod_le (m : Multiset E) : ‖m.prod‖₊ ≤ (m.map fun x => ‖x‖₊).sum :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| by
push_cast
rw [Multiset.map_map]
exact norm_multiset_prod_le _
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_prod_le (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) : ‖∏ a ∈ s, f a‖₊ ≤ ∑ a ∈ s, ‖f a‖₊ :=
| NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| by
push_cast
exact norm_prod_le _ _
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/Basic.lean | 1,212 | 1,216 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Group
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Isometry
/-!
# Metric space gluing
Gluing two metric spaces along a common subset. Formally, we are given
```
Φ
Z ---> X
|
|Ψ
v
Y
```
where `hΦ : Isometry Φ` and `hΨ : Isometry Ψ`.
We want to complete the square by a space `GlueSpacescan hΦ hΨ` and two isometries
`toGlueL hΦ hΨ` and `toGlueR hΦ hΨ` that make the square commute.
We start by defining a predistance on the disjoint union `X ⊕ Y`, for which
points `Φ p` and `Ψ p` are at distance 0. The (quotient) metric space associated
to this predistance is the desired space.
This is an instance of a more general construction, where `Φ` and `Ψ` do not have to be isometries,
but the distances in the image almost coincide, up to `2ε` say. Then one can almost glue the two
spaces so that the images of a point under `Φ` and `Ψ` are `ε`-close. If `ε > 0`, this yields a
metric space structure on `X ⊕ Y`, without the need to take a quotient. In particular,
this gives a natural metric space structure on `X ⊕ Y`, where the basepoints
are at distance 1, say, and the distances between other points are obtained by going through the two
basepoints.
(We also register the same metric space structure on a general disjoint union `Σ i, E i`).
We also define the inductive limit of metric spaces. Given
```
f 0 f 1 f 2 f 3
X 0 -----> X 1 -----> X 2 -----> X 3 -----> ...
```
where the `X n` are metric spaces and `f n` isometric embeddings, we define the inductive
limit of the `X n`, also known as the increasing union of the `X n` in this context, if we
identify `X n` and `X (n+1)` through `f n`. This is a metric space in which all `X n` embed
isometrically and in a way compatible with `f n`.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u v w
open Function Set Uniformity Topology
namespace Metric
section ApproxGluing
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {Z : Type w}
variable [MetricSpace X] [MetricSpace Y] {Φ : Z → X} {Ψ : Z → Y} {ε : ℝ}
/-- Define a predistance on `X ⊕ Y`, for which `Φ p` and `Ψ p` are at distance `ε` -/
def glueDist (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ) : X ⊕ Y → X ⊕ Y → ℝ
| .inl x, .inl y => dist x y
| .inr x, .inr y => dist x y
| .inl x, .inr y => (⨅ p, dist x (Φ p) + dist y (Ψ p)) + ε
| .inr x, .inl y => (⨅ p, dist y (Φ p) + dist x (Ψ p)) + ε
private theorem glueDist_self (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ) : ∀ x, glueDist Φ Ψ ε x x = 0
| .inl _ => dist_self _
| .inr _ => dist_self _
theorem glueDist_glued_points [Nonempty Z] (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ) (p : Z) :
glueDist Φ Ψ ε (.inl (Φ p)) (.inr (Ψ p)) = ε := by
have : ⨅ q, dist (Φ p) (Φ q) + dist (Ψ p) (Ψ q) = 0 := by
have A : ∀ q, 0 ≤ dist (Φ p) (Φ q) + dist (Ψ p) (Ψ q) := fun _ =>
add_nonneg dist_nonneg dist_nonneg
refine le_antisymm ?_ (le_ciInf A)
have : 0 = dist (Φ p) (Φ p) + dist (Ψ p) (Ψ p) := by simp
rw [this]
exact ciInf_le ⟨0, forall_mem_range.2 A⟩ p
simp only [glueDist, this, zero_add]
private theorem glueDist_comm (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ) :
∀ x y, glueDist Φ Ψ ε x y = glueDist Φ Ψ ε y x
| .inl _, .inl _ => dist_comm _ _
| .inr _, .inr _ => dist_comm _ _
| .inl _, .inr _ => rfl
| .inr _, .inl _ => rfl
theorem glueDist_swap (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ) :
∀ x y, glueDist Ψ Φ ε x.swap y.swap = glueDist Φ Ψ ε x y
| .inl _, .inl _ => rfl
| .inr _, .inr _ => rfl
| .inl _, .inr _ => by simp only [glueDist, Sum.swap_inl, Sum.swap_inr, dist_comm, add_comm]
| .inr _, .inl _ => by simp only [glueDist, Sum.swap_inl, Sum.swap_inr, dist_comm, add_comm]
theorem le_glueDist_inl_inr (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ) (x y) :
ε ≤ glueDist Φ Ψ ε (.inl x) (.inr y) :=
le_add_of_nonneg_left <| Real.iInf_nonneg fun _ => add_nonneg dist_nonneg dist_nonneg
theorem le_glueDist_inr_inl (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ) (x y) :
ε ≤ glueDist Φ Ψ ε (.inr x) (.inl y) := by
rw [glueDist_comm]; apply le_glueDist_inl_inr
section
variable [Nonempty Z]
private theorem glueDist_triangle_inl_inr_inr (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ) (x : X) (y z : Y) :
glueDist Φ Ψ ε (.inl x) (.inr z) ≤
glueDist Φ Ψ ε (.inl x) (.inr y) + glueDist Φ Ψ ε (.inr y) (.inr z) := by
simp only [glueDist]
rw [add_right_comm, add_le_add_iff_right]
refine le_ciInf_add fun p => ciInf_le_of_le ⟨0, ?_⟩ p ?_
· exact forall_mem_range.2 fun _ => add_nonneg dist_nonneg dist_nonneg
· linarith [dist_triangle_left z (Ψ p) y]
private theorem glueDist_triangle_inl_inr_inl (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ)
(H : ∀ p q, |dist (Φ p) (Φ q) - dist (Ψ p) (Ψ q)| ≤ 2 * ε) (x : X) (y : Y) (z : X) :
glueDist Φ Ψ ε (.inl x) (.inl z) ≤
glueDist Φ Ψ ε (.inl x) (.inr y) + glueDist Φ Ψ ε (.inr y) (.inl z) := by
simp_rw [glueDist, add_add_add_comm _ ε, add_assoc]
refine le_ciInf_add fun p => ?_
rw [add_left_comm, add_assoc, ← two_mul]
refine le_ciInf_add fun q => ?_
rw [dist_comm z]
linarith [dist_triangle4 x (Φ p) (Φ q) z, dist_triangle_left (Ψ p) (Ψ q) y, (abs_le.1 (H p q)).2]
private theorem glueDist_triangle (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ)
(H : ∀ p q, |dist (Φ p) (Φ q) - dist (Ψ p) (Ψ q)| ≤ 2 * ε) :
∀ x y z, glueDist Φ Ψ ε x z ≤ glueDist Φ Ψ ε x y + glueDist Φ Ψ ε y z
| .inl _, .inl _, .inl _ => dist_triangle _ _ _
| .inr _, .inr _, .inr _ => dist_triangle _ _ _
| .inr x, .inl y, .inl z => by
simp only [← glueDist_swap Φ]
apply glueDist_triangle_inl_inr_inr
| .inr x, .inr y, .inl z => by
simpa only [glueDist_comm, add_comm] using glueDist_triangle_inl_inr_inr _ _ _ z y x
| .inl x, .inl y, .inr z => by
simpa only [← glueDist_swap Φ, glueDist_comm, add_comm, Sum.swap_inl, Sum.swap_inr]
using glueDist_triangle_inl_inr_inr Ψ Φ ε z y x
| .inl _, .inr _, .inr _ => glueDist_triangle_inl_inr_inr ..
| .inl x, .inr y, .inl z => glueDist_triangle_inl_inr_inl Φ Ψ ε H x y z
| .inr x, .inl y, .inr z => by
simp only [← glueDist_swap Φ]
apply glueDist_triangle_inl_inr_inl
simpa only [abs_sub_comm]
end
private theorem eq_of_glueDist_eq_zero (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ) (ε0 : 0 < ε) :
∀ p q : X ⊕ Y, glueDist Φ Ψ ε p q = 0 → p = q
| .inl x, .inl y, h => by rw [eq_of_dist_eq_zero h]
| .inl x, .inr y, h => by exfalso; linarith [le_glueDist_inl_inr Φ Ψ ε x y]
| .inr x, .inl y, h => by exfalso; linarith [le_glueDist_inr_inl Φ Ψ ε x y]
| .inr x, .inr y, h => by rw [eq_of_dist_eq_zero h]
theorem Sum.mem_uniformity_iff_glueDist (hε : 0 < ε) (s : Set ((X ⊕ Y) × (X ⊕ Y))) :
s ∈ 𝓤 (X ⊕ Y) ↔ ∃ δ > 0, ∀ a b, glueDist Φ Ψ ε a b < δ → (a, b) ∈ s := by
simp only [Sum.uniformity, Filter.mem_sup, Filter.mem_map, mem_uniformity_dist, mem_preimage]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨δX, δX0, hX⟩, δY, δY0, hY⟩
refine ⟨min (min δX δY) ε, lt_min (lt_min δX0 δY0) hε, ?_⟩
rintro (a | a) (b | b) h <;> simp only [lt_min_iff] at h
· exact hX h.1.1
· exact absurd h.2 (le_glueDist_inl_inr _ _ _ _ _).not_lt
· exact absurd h.2 (le_glueDist_inr_inl _ _ _ _ _).not_lt
· exact hY h.1.2
· rintro ⟨ε, ε0, H⟩
constructor <;> exact ⟨ε, ε0, fun _ _ h => H _ _ h⟩
/-- Given two maps `Φ` and `Ψ` intro metric spaces `X` and `Y` such that the distances between
`Φ p` and `Φ q`, and between `Ψ p` and `Ψ q`, coincide up to `2 ε` where `ε > 0`, one can almost
glue the two spaces `X` and `Y` along the images of `Φ` and `Ψ`, so that `Φ p` and `Ψ p` are
at distance `ε`. -/
def glueMetricApprox [Nonempty Z] (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ) (ε0 : 0 < ε)
(H : ∀ p q, |dist (Φ p) (Φ q) - dist (Ψ p) (Ψ q)| ≤ 2 * ε) : MetricSpace (X ⊕ Y) where
dist := glueDist Φ Ψ ε
dist_self := glueDist_self Φ Ψ ε
dist_comm := glueDist_comm Φ Ψ ε
dist_triangle := glueDist_triangle Φ Ψ ε H
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := eq_of_glueDist_eq_zero Φ Ψ ε ε0 _ _
toUniformSpace := Sum.instUniformSpace
uniformity_dist := uniformity_dist_of_mem_uniformity _ _ <| Sum.mem_uniformity_iff_glueDist ε0
end ApproxGluing
section Sum
/-!
### Metric on `X ⊕ Y`
A particular case of the previous construction is when one uses basepoints in `X` and `Y` and one
glues only along the basepoints, putting them at distance 1. We give a direct definition of
the distance, without `iInf`, as it is easier to use in applications, and show that it is equal to
the gluing distance defined above to take advantage of the lemmas we have already proved.
-/
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {Z : Type w}
variable [MetricSpace X] [MetricSpace Y]
/-- Distance on a disjoint union. There are many (noncanonical) ways to put a distance compatible
with each factor.
If the two spaces are bounded, one can say for instance that each point in the first is at distance
`diam X + diam Y + 1` of each point in the second.
Instead, we choose a construction that works for unbounded spaces, but requires basepoints,
chosen arbitrarily.
We embed isometrically each factor, set the basepoints at distance 1,
arbitrarily, and say that the distance from `a` to `b` is the sum of the distances of `a` and `b` to
their respective basepoints, plus the distance 1 between the basepoints.
Since there is an arbitrary choice in this construction, it is not an instance by default. -/
protected def Sum.dist : X ⊕ Y → X ⊕ Y → ℝ
| .inl a, .inl a' => dist a a'
| .inr b, .inr b' => dist b b'
| .inl a, .inr b => dist a (Nonempty.some ⟨a⟩) + 1 + dist (Nonempty.some ⟨b⟩) b
| .inr b, .inl a => dist b (Nonempty.some ⟨b⟩) + 1 + dist (Nonempty.some ⟨a⟩) a
theorem Sum.dist_eq_glueDist {p q : X ⊕ Y} (x : X) (y : Y) :
Sum.dist p q =
glueDist (fun _ : Unit => Nonempty.some ⟨x⟩) (fun _ : Unit => Nonempty.some ⟨y⟩) 1 p q := by
cases p <;> cases q <;> first |rfl|simp [Sum.dist, glueDist, dist_comm, add_comm,
add_left_comm, add_assoc]
private theorem Sum.dist_comm (x y : X ⊕ Y) : Sum.dist x y = Sum.dist y x := by
cases x <;> cases y <;> simp [Sum.dist, _root_.dist_comm, add_comm, add_left_comm, add_assoc]
theorem Sum.one_le_dist_inl_inr {x : X} {y : Y} : 1 ≤ Sum.dist (.inl x) (.inr y) :=
le_trans (le_add_of_nonneg_right dist_nonneg) <|
add_le_add_right (le_add_of_nonneg_left dist_nonneg) _
theorem Sum.one_le_dist_inr_inl {x : X} {y : Y} : 1 ≤ Sum.dist (.inr y) (.inl x) := by
rw [Sum.dist_comm]; exact Sum.one_le_dist_inl_inr
private theorem Sum.mem_uniformity (s : Set ((X ⊕ Y) × (X ⊕ Y))) :
s ∈ 𝓤 (X ⊕ Y) ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ a b, Sum.dist a b < ε → (a, b) ∈ s := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨hsX, hsY⟩
rcases mem_uniformity_dist.1 hsX with ⟨εX, εX0, hX⟩
rcases mem_uniformity_dist.1 hsY with ⟨εY, εY0, hY⟩
refine ⟨min (min εX εY) 1, lt_min (lt_min εX0 εY0) zero_lt_one, ?_⟩
rintro (a | a) (b | b) h
· exact hX (lt_of_lt_of_le h (le_trans (min_le_left _ _) (min_le_left _ _)))
· cases not_le_of_lt (lt_of_lt_of_le h (min_le_right _ _)) Sum.one_le_dist_inl_inr
· cases not_le_of_lt (lt_of_lt_of_le h (min_le_right _ _)) Sum.one_le_dist_inr_inl
· exact hY (lt_of_lt_of_le h (le_trans (min_le_left _ _) (min_le_right _ _)))
· rintro ⟨ε, ε0, H⟩
constructor <;> rw [Filter.mem_map, mem_uniformity_dist] <;> exact ⟨ε, ε0, fun _ _ h => H _ _ h⟩
/-- The distance on the disjoint union indeed defines a metric space. All the distance properties
follow from our choice of the distance. The harder work is to show that the uniform structure
defined by the distance coincides with the disjoint union uniform structure. -/
def metricSpaceSum : MetricSpace (X ⊕ Y) where
dist := Sum.dist
dist_self x := by cases x <;> simp only [Sum.dist, dist_self]
dist_comm := Sum.dist_comm
dist_triangle
| .inl p, .inl q, .inl r => dist_triangle p q r
| .inl p, .inr q, _ => by
simp only [Sum.dist_eq_glueDist p q]
exact glueDist_triangle _ _ _ (by norm_num) _ _ _
| _, .inl q, .inr r => by
simp only [Sum.dist_eq_glueDist q r]
exact glueDist_triangle _ _ _ (by norm_num) _ _ _
| .inr p, _, .inl r => by
simp only [Sum.dist_eq_glueDist r p]
exact glueDist_triangle _ _ _ (by norm_num) _ _ _
| .inr p, .inr q, .inr r => dist_triangle p q r
eq_of_dist_eq_zero {p q} h := by
rcases p with p | p <;> rcases q with q | q
· rw [eq_of_dist_eq_zero h]
· exact eq_of_glueDist_eq_zero _ _ _ one_pos _ _ ((Sum.dist_eq_glueDist p q).symm.trans h)
· exact eq_of_glueDist_eq_zero _ _ _ one_pos _ _ ((Sum.dist_eq_glueDist q p).symm.trans h)
· rw [eq_of_dist_eq_zero h]
toUniformSpace := Sum.instUniformSpace
uniformity_dist := uniformity_dist_of_mem_uniformity _ _ Sum.mem_uniformity
attribute [local instance] metricSpaceSum
theorem Sum.dist_eq {x y : X ⊕ Y} : dist x y = Sum.dist x y := rfl
/-- The left injection of a space in a disjoint union is an isometry -/
theorem isometry_inl : Isometry (Sum.inl : X → X ⊕ Y) :=
Isometry.of_dist_eq fun _ _ => rfl
/-- The right injection of a space in a disjoint union is an isometry -/
theorem isometry_inr : Isometry (Sum.inr : Y → X ⊕ Y) :=
Isometry.of_dist_eq fun _ _ => rfl
end Sum
namespace Sigma
/- Copy of the previous paragraph, but for arbitrary disjoint unions instead of the disjoint union
of two spaces. I.e., work with sigma types instead of sum types. -/
variable {ι : Type*} {E : ι → Type*} [∀ i, MetricSpace (E i)]
open Classical in
/-- Distance on a disjoint union. There are many (noncanonical) ways to put a distance compatible
with each factor.
We choose a construction that works for unbounded spaces, but requires basepoints,
chosen arbitrarily.
We embed isometrically each factor, set the basepoints at distance 1, arbitrarily,
and say that the distance from `a` to `b` is the sum of the distances of `a` and `b` to
their respective basepoints, plus the distance 1 between the basepoints.
Since there is an arbitrary choice in this construction, it is not an instance by default. -/
protected def dist : (Σ i, E i) → (Σ i, E i) → ℝ
| ⟨i, x⟩, ⟨j, y⟩ =>
if h : i = j then
haveI : E j = E i := by rw [h]
Dist.dist x (cast this y)
else Dist.dist x (Nonempty.some ⟨x⟩) + 1 + Dist.dist (Nonempty.some ⟨y⟩) y
/-- A `Dist` instance on the disjoint union `Σ i, E i`.
We embed isometrically each factor, set the basepoints at distance 1, arbitrarily,
and say that the distance from `a` to `b` is the sum of the distances of `a` and `b` to
their respective basepoints, plus the distance 1 between the basepoints.
Since there is an arbitrary choice in this construction, it is not an instance by default. -/
def instDist : Dist (Σ i, E i) :=
⟨Sigma.dist⟩
attribute [local instance] Sigma.instDist
@[simp]
theorem dist_same (i : ι) (x y : E i) : dist (Sigma.mk i x) ⟨i, y⟩ = dist x y := by
simp [Dist.dist, Sigma.dist]
@[simp]
theorem dist_ne {i j : ι} (h : i ≠ j) (x : E i) (y : E j) :
dist (⟨i, x⟩ : Σk, E k) ⟨j, y⟩ = dist x (Nonempty.some ⟨x⟩) + 1 + dist (Nonempty.some ⟨y⟩) y :=
dif_neg h
theorem one_le_dist_of_ne {i j : ι} (h : i ≠ j) (x : E i) (y : E j) :
1 ≤ dist (⟨i, x⟩ : Σk, E k) ⟨j, y⟩ := by
rw [Sigma.dist_ne h x y]
linarith [@dist_nonneg _ _ x (Nonempty.some ⟨x⟩), @dist_nonneg _ _ (Nonempty.some ⟨y⟩) y]
theorem fst_eq_of_dist_lt_one (x y : Σ i, E i) (h : dist x y < 1) : x.1 = y.1 := by
cases x; cases y
contrapose! h
apply one_le_dist_of_ne h
protected theorem dist_triangle (x y z : Σ i, E i) : dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z := by
rcases x with ⟨i, x⟩; rcases y with ⟨j, y⟩; rcases z with ⟨k, z⟩
rcases eq_or_ne i k with (rfl | hik)
· rcases eq_or_ne i j with (rfl | hij)
· simpa using dist_triangle x y z
· simp only [Sigma.dist_same, Sigma.dist_ne hij, Sigma.dist_ne hij.symm]
calc
dist x z ≤ dist x (Nonempty.some ⟨x⟩) + 0 + 0 + (0 + 0 + dist (Nonempty.some ⟨z⟩) z) := by
simpa only [zero_add, add_zero] using dist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ _ := by apply_rules [add_le_add, le_rfl, dist_nonneg, zero_le_one]
· rcases eq_or_ne i j with (rfl | hij)
· simp only [Sigma.dist_ne hik, Sigma.dist_same]
calc
dist x (Nonempty.some ⟨x⟩) + 1 + dist (Nonempty.some ⟨z⟩) z ≤
dist x y + dist y (Nonempty.some ⟨y⟩) + 1 + dist (Nonempty.some ⟨z⟩) z := by
apply_rules [add_le_add, le_rfl, dist_triangle]
_ = _ := by abel
· rcases eq_or_ne j k with (rfl | hjk)
· simp only [Sigma.dist_ne hij, Sigma.dist_same]
calc
dist x (Nonempty.some ⟨x⟩) + 1 + dist (Nonempty.some ⟨z⟩) z ≤
dist x (Nonempty.some ⟨x⟩) + 1 + (dist (Nonempty.some ⟨z⟩) y + dist y z) := by
apply_rules [add_le_add, le_rfl, dist_triangle]
_ = _ := by abel
· simp only [hik, hij, hjk, Sigma.dist_ne, Ne, not_false_iff]
calc
dist x (Nonempty.some ⟨x⟩) + 1 + dist (Nonempty.some ⟨z⟩) z =
dist x (Nonempty.some ⟨x⟩) + 1 + 0 + (0 + 0 + dist (Nonempty.some ⟨z⟩) z) := by
simp only [add_zero, zero_add]
_ ≤ _ := by apply_rules [add_le_add, zero_le_one, dist_nonneg, le_rfl]
protected theorem isOpen_iff (s : Set (Σ i, E i)) :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y, dist x y < ε → y ∈ s := by
constructor
· rintro hs ⟨i, x⟩ hx
obtain ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩ : ∃ ε > 0, ball x ε ⊆ Sigma.mk i ⁻¹' s :=
Metric.isOpen_iff.1 (isOpen_sigma_iff.1 hs i) x hx
refine ⟨min ε 1, lt_min εpos zero_lt_one, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨j, y⟩ hy
rcases eq_or_ne i j with (rfl | hij)
· simp only [Sigma.dist_same, lt_min_iff] at hy
exact hε (mem_ball'.2 hy.1)
· apply (lt_irrefl (1 : ℝ) _).elim
calc
1 ≤ Sigma.dist ⟨i, x⟩ ⟨j, y⟩ := Sigma.one_le_dist_of_ne hij _ _
_ < 1 := hy.trans_le (min_le_right _ _)
· refine fun H => isOpen_sigma_iff.2 fun i => Metric.isOpen_iff.2 fun x hx => ?_
obtain ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩ : ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y, dist (⟨i, x⟩ : Σj, E j) y < ε → y ∈ s :=
H ⟨i, x⟩ hx
refine ⟨ε, εpos, fun y hy => ?_⟩
apply hε ⟨i, y⟩
rw [Sigma.dist_same]
exact mem_ball'.1 hy
/-- A metric space structure on the disjoint union `Σ i, E i`.
We embed isometrically each factor, set the basepoints at distance 1, arbitrarily,
and say that the distance from `a` to `b` is the sum of the distances of `a` and `b` to
their respective basepoints, plus the distance 1 between the basepoints.
Since there is an arbitrary choice in this construction, it is not an instance by default. -/
protected def metricSpace : MetricSpace (Σ i, E i) := by
refine MetricSpace.ofDistTopology Sigma.dist ?_ ?_ Sigma.dist_triangle Sigma.isOpen_iff ?_
· rintro ⟨i, x⟩
simp [Sigma.dist]
· rintro ⟨i, x⟩ ⟨j, y⟩
rcases eq_or_ne i j with (rfl | h)
· simp [Sigma.dist, dist_comm]
· simp only [Sigma.dist, dist_comm, h, h.symm, not_false_iff, dif_neg]
abel
· rintro ⟨i, x⟩ ⟨j, y⟩
rcases eq_or_ne i j with (rfl | hij)
· simp [Sigma.dist]
· intro h
apply (lt_irrefl (1 : ℝ) _).elim
calc
1 ≤ Sigma.dist (⟨i, x⟩ : Σk, E k) ⟨j, y⟩ := Sigma.one_le_dist_of_ne hij _ _
_ < 1 := by rw [h]; exact zero_lt_one
attribute [local instance] Sigma.metricSpace
open Topology
open Filter
/-- The injection of a space in a disjoint union is an isometry -/
theorem isometry_mk (i : ι) : Isometry (Sigma.mk i : E i → Σk, E k) :=
Isometry.of_dist_eq fun x y => by simp
/-- A disjoint union of complete metric spaces is complete. -/
protected theorem completeSpace [∀ i, CompleteSpace (E i)] : CompleteSpace (Σ i, E i) := by
set s : ι → Set (Σ i, E i) := fun i => Sigma.fst ⁻¹' {i}
set U := { p : (Σk, E k) × Σk, E k | dist p.1 p.2 < 1 }
have hc : ∀ i, IsComplete (s i) := fun i => by
simp only [s, ← range_sigmaMk]
exact (isometry_mk i).isUniformInducing.isComplete_range
have hd : ∀ (i j), ∀ x ∈ s i, ∀ y ∈ s j, (x, y) ∈ U → i = j := fun i j x hx y hy hxy =>
(Eq.symm hx).trans ((fst_eq_of_dist_lt_one _ _ hxy).trans hy)
refine completeSpace_of_isComplete_univ ?_
convert isComplete_iUnion_separated hc (dist_mem_uniformity zero_lt_one) hd
simp only [s, ← preimage_iUnion, iUnion_of_singleton, preimage_univ]
end Sigma
section Gluing
-- Exact gluing of two metric spaces along isometric subsets.
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {Z : Type w}
variable [Nonempty Z] [MetricSpace Z] [MetricSpace X] [MetricSpace Y] {Φ : Z → X} {Ψ : Z → Y}
{ε : ℝ}
/-- Given two isometric embeddings `Φ : Z → X` and `Ψ : Z → Y`, we define a pseudo metric space
structure on `X ⊕ Y` by declaring that `Φ x` and `Ψ x` are at distance `0`. -/
def gluePremetric (hΦ : Isometry Φ) (hΨ : Isometry Ψ) : PseudoMetricSpace (X ⊕ Y) where
dist := glueDist Φ Ψ 0
dist_self := glueDist_self Φ Ψ 0
dist_comm := glueDist_comm Φ Ψ 0
dist_triangle := glueDist_triangle Φ Ψ 0 fun p q => by rw [hΦ.dist_eq, hΨ.dist_eq]; simp
/-- Given two isometric embeddings `Φ : Z → X` and `Ψ : Z → Y`, we define a
space `GlueSpace hΦ hΨ` by identifying in `X ⊕ Y` the points `Φ x` and `Ψ x`. -/
def GlueSpace (hΦ : Isometry Φ) (hΨ : Isometry Ψ) : Type _ :=
@SeparationQuotient _ (gluePremetric hΦ hΨ).toUniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace
instance (hΦ : Isometry Φ) (hΨ : Isometry Ψ) : MetricSpace (GlueSpace hΦ hΨ) :=
inferInstanceAs <| MetricSpace <|
@SeparationQuotient _ (gluePremetric hΦ hΨ).toUniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace
/-- The canonical map from `X` to the space obtained by gluing isometric subsets in `X` and `Y`. -/
def toGlueL (hΦ : Isometry Φ) (hΨ : Isometry Ψ) (x : X) : GlueSpace hΦ hΨ :=
Quotient.mk'' (.inl x)
/-- The canonical map from `Y` to the space obtained by gluing isometric subsets in `X` and `Y`. -/
def toGlueR (hΦ : Isometry Φ) (hΨ : Isometry Ψ) (y : Y) : GlueSpace hΦ hΨ :=
Quotient.mk'' (.inr y)
instance inhabitedLeft (hΦ : Isometry Φ) (hΨ : Isometry Ψ) [Inhabited X] :
Inhabited (GlueSpace hΦ hΨ) :=
⟨toGlueL _ _ default⟩
instance inhabitedRight (hΦ : Isometry Φ) (hΨ : Isometry Ψ) [Inhabited Y] :
Inhabited (GlueSpace hΦ hΨ) :=
⟨toGlueR _ _ default⟩
theorem toGlue_commute (hΦ : Isometry Φ) (hΨ : Isometry Ψ) :
toGlueL hΦ hΨ ∘ Φ = toGlueR hΦ hΨ ∘ Ψ := by
let i : PseudoMetricSpace (X ⊕ Y) := gluePremetric hΦ hΨ
let _ := i.toUniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace
funext
simp only [comp, toGlueL, toGlueR]
refine SeparationQuotient.mk_eq_mk.2 (Metric.inseparable_iff.2 ?_)
exact glueDist_glued_points Φ Ψ 0 _
theorem toGlueL_isometry (hΦ : Isometry Φ) (hΨ : Isometry Ψ) : Isometry (toGlueL hΦ hΨ) :=
Isometry.of_dist_eq fun _ _ => rfl
theorem toGlueR_isometry (hΦ : Isometry Φ) (hΨ : Isometry Ψ) : Isometry (toGlueR hΦ hΨ) :=
Isometry.of_dist_eq fun _ _ => rfl
end Gluing
--section
section InductiveLimit
/-!
### Inductive limit of metric spaces
In this section, we define the inductive limit of
```
f 0 f 1 f 2 f 3
X 0 -----> X 1 -----> X 2 -----> X 3 -----> ...
```
where the `X n` are metric spaces and f n isometric embeddings. We do it by defining a premetric
space structure on `Σ n, X n`, where the predistance `dist x y` is obtained by pushing `x` and `y`
in a common `X k` using composition by the `f n`, and taking the distance there. This does not
depend on the choice of `k` as the `f n` are isometries. The metric space associated to this
premetric space is the desired inductive limit.
-/
open Nat
variable {X : ℕ → Type u} [∀ n, MetricSpace (X n)] {f : ∀ n, X n → X (n + 1)}
/-- Predistance on the disjoint union `Σ n, X n`. -/
def inductiveLimitDist (f : ∀ n, X n → X (n + 1)) (x y : Σ n, X n) : ℝ :=
dist (leRecOn (le_max_left x.1 y.1) (f _) x.2 : X (max x.1 y.1))
(leRecOn (le_max_right x.1 y.1) (f _) y.2 : X (max x.1 y.1))
/-- The predistance on the disjoint union `Σ n, X n` can be computed in any `X k` for large
enough `k`. -/
theorem inductiveLimitDist_eq_dist (I : ∀ n, Isometry (f n)) (x y : Σ n, X n) :
∀ m (hx : x.1 ≤ m) (hy : y.1 ≤ m), inductiveLimitDist f x y =
dist (leRecOn hx (f _) x.2 : X m) (leRecOn hy (f _) y.2 : X m)
| 0, hx, hy => by
obtain ⟨i, x⟩ := x; obtain ⟨j, y⟩ := y
obtain rfl : i = 0 := nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 hx
obtain rfl : j = 0 := nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 hy
rfl
| (m + 1), hx, hy => by
by_cases h : max x.1 y.1 = (m + 1)
· generalize m + 1 = m' at *
subst m'
rfl
· have : max x.1 y.1 ≤ succ m := by simp [hx, hy]
have : max x.1 y.1 ≤ m := by simpa [h] using of_le_succ this
have xm : x.1 ≤ m := le_trans (le_max_left _ _) this
have ym : y.1 ≤ m := le_trans (le_max_right _ _) this
rw [leRecOn_succ xm, leRecOn_succ ym, (I m).dist_eq]
exact inductiveLimitDist_eq_dist I x y m xm ym
/-- Premetric space structure on `Σ n, X n`. -/
def inductivePremetric (I : ∀ n, Isometry (f n)) : PseudoMetricSpace (Σn, X n) where
dist := inductiveLimitDist f
dist_self x := by simp [dist, inductiveLimitDist]
dist_comm x y := by
let m := max x.1 y.1
have hx : x.1 ≤ m := le_max_left _ _
have hy : y.1 ≤ m := le_max_right _ _
rw [inductiveLimitDist_eq_dist I x y m hx hy, inductiveLimitDist_eq_dist I y x m hy hx,
dist_comm]
dist_triangle x y z := by
let m := max (max x.1 y.1) z.1
have hx : x.1 ≤ m := le_trans (le_max_left _ _) (le_max_left _ _)
have hy : y.1 ≤ m := le_trans (le_max_right _ _) (le_max_left _ _)
have hz : z.1 ≤ m := le_max_right _ _
calc
inductiveLimitDist f x z = dist (leRecOn hx (f _) x.2 : X m) (leRecOn hz (f _) z.2 : X m) :=
inductiveLimitDist_eq_dist I x z m hx hz
_ ≤ dist (leRecOn hx (f _) x.2 : X m) (leRecOn hy (f _) y.2 : X m) +
dist (leRecOn hy (f _) y.2 : X m) (leRecOn hz (f _) z.2 : X m) :=
(dist_triangle _ _ _)
_ = inductiveLimitDist f x y + inductiveLimitDist f y z := by
rw [inductiveLimitDist_eq_dist I x y m hx hy, inductiveLimitDist_eq_dist I y z m hy hz]
attribute [local instance] inductivePremetric
/-- The type giving the inductive limit in a metric space context. -/
def InductiveLimit (I : ∀ n, Isometry (f n)) : Type _ :=
@SeparationQuotient _ (inductivePremetric I).toUniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace
instance {I : ∀ (n : ℕ), Isometry (f n)} : MetricSpace (InductiveLimit (f := f) I) :=
inferInstanceAs <| MetricSpace <|
@SeparationQuotient _ (inductivePremetric I).toUniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace
/-- Mapping each `X n` to the inductive limit. -/
def toInductiveLimit (I : ∀ n, Isometry (f n)) (n : ℕ) (x : X n) : Metric.InductiveLimit I :=
Quotient.mk'' (Sigma.mk n x)
instance (I : ∀ n, Isometry (f n)) [Inhabited (X 0)] : Inhabited (InductiveLimit I) :=
⟨toInductiveLimit _ 0 default⟩
/-- The map `toInductiveLimit n` mapping `X n` to the inductive limit is an isometry. -/
theorem toInductiveLimit_isometry (I : ∀ n, Isometry (f n)) (n : ℕ) :
Isometry (toInductiveLimit I n) :=
Isometry.of_dist_eq fun x y => by
change inductiveLimitDist f ⟨n, x⟩ ⟨n, y⟩ = dist x y
rw [inductiveLimitDist_eq_dist I ⟨n, x⟩ ⟨n, y⟩ n (le_refl n) (le_refl n), leRecOn_self,
leRecOn_self]
/-- The maps `toInductiveLimit n` are compatible with the maps `f n`. -/
theorem toInductiveLimit_commute (I : ∀ n, Isometry (f n)) (n : ℕ) :
toInductiveLimit I n.succ ∘ f n = toInductiveLimit I n := by
let h := inductivePremetric I
let _ := h.toUniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace
funext x
simp only [comp, toInductiveLimit]
refine SeparationQuotient.mk_eq_mk.2 (Metric.inseparable_iff.2 ?_)
show inductiveLimitDist f ⟨n.succ, f n x⟩ ⟨n, x⟩ = 0
rw [inductiveLimitDist_eq_dist I ⟨n.succ, f n x⟩ ⟨n, x⟩ n.succ, leRecOn_self,
leRecOn_succ, leRecOn_self, dist_self]
exact le_succ _
end InductiveLimit
--section
end Metric
--namespace
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Gluing.lean | 645 | 655 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Logic.Small.Basic
import Mathlib.SetTheory.ZFC.PSet
/-!
# A model of ZFC
In this file, we model Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory (+ choice) using Lean's underlying type theory,
building on the pre-sets defined in `Mathlib.SetTheory.ZFC.PSet`.
The theory of classes is developed in `Mathlib.SetTheory.ZFC.Class`.
## Main definitions
* `ZFSet`: ZFC set. Defined as `PSet` quotiented by `PSet.Equiv`, the extensional equivalence.
* `ZFSet.choice`: Axiom of choice. Proved from Lean's axiom of choice.
* `ZFSet.omega`: The von Neumann ordinal `ω` as a `Set`.
* `Classical.allZFSetDefinable`: All functions are classically definable.
* `ZFSet.IsFunc` : Predicate that a ZFC set is a subset of `x × y` that can be considered as a ZFC
function `x → y`. That is, each member of `x` is related by the ZFC set to exactly one member of
`y`.
* `ZFSet.funs`: ZFC set of ZFC functions `x → y`.
* `ZFSet.Hereditarily p x`: Predicate that every set in the transitive closure of `x` has property
`p`.
## Notes
To avoid confusion between the Lean `Set` and the ZFC `Set`, docstrings in this file refer to them
respectively as "`Set`" and "ZFC set".
-/
universe u
/-- The ZFC universe of sets consists of the type of pre-sets,
quotiented by extensional equivalence. -/
@[pp_with_univ]
def ZFSet : Type (u + 1) :=
Quotient PSet.setoid.{u}
namespace ZFSet
/-- Turns a pre-set into a ZFC set. -/
def mk : PSet → ZFSet :=
Quotient.mk''
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq (x : PSet) : @Eq ZFSet ⟦x⟧ (mk x) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_out : ∀ x : ZFSet, mk x.out = x :=
Quotient.out_eq
/-- A set function is "definable" if it is the image of some n-ary `PSet`
function. This isn't exactly definability, but is useful as a sufficient
condition for functions that have a computable image. -/
class Definable (n) (f : (Fin n → ZFSet.{u}) → ZFSet.{u}) where
/-- Turns a definable function into an n-ary `PSet` function. -/
out : (Fin n → PSet.{u}) → PSet.{u}
/-- A set function `f` is the image of `Definable.out f`. -/
mk_out xs : mk (out xs) = f (mk <| xs ·) := by simp
attribute [simp] Definable.mk_out
/-- An abbrev of `ZFSet.Definable` for unary functions. -/
abbrev Definable₁ (f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}) := Definable 1 (fun s ↦ f (s 0))
/-- A simpler constructor for `ZFSet.Definable₁`. -/
abbrev Definable₁.mk {f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}}
(out : PSet.{u} → PSet.{u}) (mk_out : ∀ x, ⟦out x⟧ = f ⟦x⟧) :
Definable₁ f where
out xs := out (xs 0)
mk_out xs := mk_out (xs 0)
/-- Turns a unary definable function into a unary `PSet` function. -/
abbrev Definable₁.out (f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}) [Definable₁ f] :
PSet.{u} → PSet.{u} :=
fun x ↦ Definable.out (fun s ↦ f (s 0)) ![x]
lemma Definable₁.mk_out {f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}} [Definable₁ f]
{x : PSet} :
.mk (out f x) = f (.mk x) :=
Definable.mk_out ![x]
/-- An abbrev of `ZFSet.Definable` for binary functions. -/
abbrev Definable₂ (f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}) := Definable 2 (fun s ↦ f (s 0) (s 1))
/-- A simpler constructor for `ZFSet.Definable₂`. -/
abbrev Definable₂.mk {f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}}
(out : PSet.{u} → PSet.{u} → PSet.{u}) (mk_out : ∀ x y, ⟦out x y⟧ = f ⟦x⟧ ⟦y⟧) :
Definable₂ f where
out xs := out (xs 0) (xs 1)
mk_out xs := mk_out (xs 0) (xs 1)
/-- Turns a binary definable function into a binary `PSet` function. -/
abbrev Definable₂.out (f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}) [Definable₂ f] :
PSet.{u} → PSet.{u} → PSet.{u} :=
fun x y ↦ Definable.out (fun s ↦ f (s 0) (s 1)) ![x, y]
lemma Definable₂.mk_out {f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}} [Definable₂ f]
{x y : PSet} :
.mk (out f x y) = f (.mk x) (.mk y) :=
Definable.mk_out ![x, y]
instance (f) [Definable₁ f] (n g) [Definable n g] :
Definable n (fun s ↦ f (g s)) where
out xs := Definable₁.out f (Definable.out g xs)
instance (f) [Definable₂ f] (n g₁ g₂) [Definable n g₁] [Definable n g₂] :
Definable n (fun s ↦ f (g₁ s) (g₂ s)) where
out xs := Definable₂.out f (Definable.out g₁ xs) (Definable.out g₂ xs)
instance (n) (i) : Definable n (fun s ↦ s i) where
out s := s i
lemma Definable.out_equiv {n} (f : (Fin n → ZFSet.{u}) → ZFSet.{u}) [Definable n f]
{xs ys : Fin n → PSet} (h : ∀ i, xs i ≈ ys i) :
out f xs ≈ out f ys := by
rw [← Quotient.eq_iff_equiv, mk_eq, mk_eq, mk_out, mk_out]
exact congrArg _ (funext fun i ↦ Quotient.sound (h i))
lemma Definable₁.out_equiv (f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}) [Definable₁ f]
{x y : PSet} (h : x ≈ y) :
out f x ≈ out f y :=
Definable.out_equiv _ (by simp [h])
lemma Definable₂.out_equiv (f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}) [Definable₂ f]
{x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : PSet} (h₁ : x₁ ≈ y₁) (h₂ : x₂ ≈ y₂) :
out f x₁ x₂ ≈ out f y₁ y₂ :=
Definable.out_equiv _ (by simp [Fin.forall_fin_succ, h₁, h₂])
end ZFSet
namespace Classical
open PSet ZFSet
/-- All functions are classically definable. -/
noncomputable def allZFSetDefinable {n} (F : (Fin n → ZFSet.{u}) → ZFSet.{u}) : Definable n F where
out xs := (F (mk <| xs ·)).out
end Classical
namespace ZFSet
open PSet
theorem eq {x y : PSet} : mk x = mk y ↔ Equiv x y :=
Quotient.eq
theorem sound {x y : PSet} (h : PSet.Equiv x y) : mk x = mk y :=
Quotient.sound h
theorem exact {x y : PSet} : mk x = mk y → PSet.Equiv x y :=
Quotient.exact
/-- The membership relation for ZFC sets is inherited from the membership relation for pre-sets. -/
protected def Mem : ZFSet → ZFSet → Prop :=
Quotient.lift₂ (· ∈ ·) fun _ _ _ _ hx hy =>
propext ((Mem.congr_left hx).trans (Mem.congr_right hy))
instance : Membership ZFSet ZFSet where
mem t s := ZFSet.Mem s t
@[simp]
theorem mk_mem_iff {x y : PSet} : mk x ∈ mk y ↔ x ∈ y :=
Iff.rfl
/-- Convert a ZFC set into a `Set` of ZFC sets -/
def toSet (u : ZFSet.{u}) : Set ZFSet.{u} :=
{ x | x ∈ u }
@[simp]
theorem mem_toSet (a u : ZFSet.{u}) : a ∈ u.toSet ↔ a ∈ u :=
Iff.rfl
instance small_toSet (x : ZFSet.{u}) : Small.{u} x.toSet :=
Quotient.inductionOn x fun a => by
let f : a.Type → (mk a).toSet := fun i => ⟨mk <| a.Func i, func_mem a i⟩
suffices Function.Surjective f by exact small_of_surjective this
rintro ⟨y, hb⟩
induction y using Quotient.inductionOn
obtain ⟨i, h⟩ := hb
exact ⟨i, Subtype.coe_injective (Quotient.sound h.symm)⟩
/-- A nonempty set is one that contains some element. -/
protected def Nonempty (u : ZFSet) : Prop :=
u.toSet.Nonempty
theorem nonempty_def (u : ZFSet) : u.Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ u :=
Iff.rfl
theorem nonempty_of_mem {x u : ZFSet} (h : x ∈ u) : u.Nonempty :=
⟨x, h⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_toSet_iff {u : ZFSet} : u.toSet.Nonempty ↔ u.Nonempty :=
Iff.rfl
/-- `x ⊆ y` as ZFC sets means that all members of `x` are members of `y`. -/
protected def Subset (x y : ZFSet.{u}) :=
∀ ⦃z⦄, z ∈ x → z ∈ y
instance hasSubset : HasSubset ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.Subset⟩
theorem subset_def {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : x ⊆ y ↔ ∀ ⦃z⦄, z ∈ x → z ∈ y :=
Iff.rfl
instance : IsRefl ZFSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ => id⟩
instance : IsTrans ZFSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ hxy hyz _ ha => hyz (hxy ha)⟩
@[simp]
theorem subset_iff : ∀ {x y : PSet}, mk x ⊆ mk y ↔ x ⊆ y
| ⟨_, A⟩, ⟨_, _⟩ =>
⟨fun h a => @h ⟦A a⟧ (Mem.mk A a), fun h z =>
Quotient.inductionOn z fun _ ⟨a, za⟩ =>
let ⟨b, ab⟩ := h a
⟨b, za.trans ab⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem toSet_subset_iff {x y : ZFSet} : x.toSet ⊆ y.toSet ↔ x ⊆ y := by
simp [subset_def, Set.subset_def]
@[ext]
theorem ext {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : (∀ z : ZFSet.{u}, z ∈ x ↔ z ∈ y) → x = y :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun _ _ h => Quotient.sound (Mem.ext fun w => h ⟦w⟧)
theorem toSet_injective : Function.Injective toSet := fun _ _ h => ext <| Set.ext_iff.1 h
@[simp]
theorem toSet_inj {x y : ZFSet} : x.toSet = y.toSet ↔ x = y :=
toSet_injective.eq_iff
instance : IsAntisymm ZFSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ hab hba => ext fun c => ⟨@hab c, @hba c⟩⟩
/-- The empty ZFC set -/
protected def empty : ZFSet :=
mk ∅
instance : EmptyCollection ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.empty⟩
instance : Inhabited ZFSet :=
⟨∅⟩
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_empty (x) : x ∉ (∅ : ZFSet.{u}) :=
Quotient.inductionOn x PSet.not_mem_empty
@[simp]
theorem toSet_empty : toSet ∅ = ∅ := by simp [toSet]
@[simp]
theorem empty_subset (x : ZFSet.{u}) : (∅ : ZFSet) ⊆ x :=
Quotient.inductionOn x fun y => subset_iff.2 <| PSet.empty_subset y
@[simp]
theorem not_nonempty_empty : ¬ZFSet.Nonempty ∅ := by simp [ZFSet.Nonempty]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_mk_iff {x : PSet} : (mk x).Nonempty ↔ x.Nonempty := by
refine ⟨?_, fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨mk a, h⟩⟩
rintro ⟨a, h⟩
induction a using Quotient.inductionOn
exact ⟨_, h⟩
theorem eq_empty (x : ZFSet.{u}) : x = ∅ ↔ ∀ y : ZFSet.{u}, y ∉ x := by
simp [ZFSet.ext_iff]
theorem eq_empty_or_nonempty (u : ZFSet) : u = ∅ ∨ u.Nonempty := by
rw [eq_empty, ← not_exists]
apply em'
/-- `Insert x y` is the set `{x} ∪ y` -/
protected def Insert : ZFSet → ZFSet → ZFSet :=
Quotient.map₂ PSet.insert
fun _ _ uv ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨fun o =>
match o with
| some a =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := αβ a
⟨some b, hb⟩
| none => ⟨none, uv⟩,
fun o =>
match o with
| some b =>
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := βα b
⟨some a, ha⟩
| none => ⟨none, uv⟩⟩
instance : Insert ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.Insert⟩
instance : Singleton ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨fun x => insert x ∅⟩
instance : LawfulSingleton ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨fun _ => rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_insert_iff {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : x ∈ insert y z ↔ x = y ∨ x ∈ z :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ x y z fun _ _ _ => PSet.mem_insert_iff.trans (or_congr_left eq.symm)
theorem mem_insert (x y : ZFSet) : x ∈ insert x y :=
mem_insert_iff.2 <| Or.inl rfl
theorem mem_insert_of_mem {y z : ZFSet} (x) (h : z ∈ y) : z ∈ insert x y :=
mem_insert_iff.2 <| Or.inr h
@[simp]
theorem toSet_insert (x y : ZFSet) : (insert x y).toSet = insert x y.toSet := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem mem_singleton {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : x ∈ @singleton ZFSet.{u} ZFSet.{u} _ y ↔ x = y :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun _ _ => PSet.mem_singleton.trans eq.symm
@[simp]
theorem toSet_singleton (x : ZFSet) : ({x} : ZFSet).toSet = {x} := by
ext
simp
theorem insert_nonempty (u v : ZFSet) : (insert u v).Nonempty :=
⟨u, mem_insert u v⟩
theorem singleton_nonempty (u : ZFSet) : ZFSet.Nonempty {u} :=
insert_nonempty u ∅
theorem mem_pair {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : x ∈ ({y, z} : ZFSet) ↔ x = y ∨ x = z := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem pair_eq_singleton (x : ZFSet) : {x, x} = ({x} : ZFSet) := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem pair_eq_singleton_iff {x y z : ZFSet} : ({x, y} : ZFSet) = {z} ↔ x = z ∧ y = z := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← mem_singleton, ← mem_singleton]
simp [← h]
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact pair_eq_singleton y
@[simp]
theorem singleton_eq_pair_iff {x y z : ZFSet} : ({x} : ZFSet) = {y, z} ↔ x = y ∧ x = z := by
rw [eq_comm, pair_eq_singleton_iff]
simp_rw [eq_comm]
/-- `omega` is the first infinite von Neumann ordinal -/
def omega : ZFSet :=
mk PSet.omega
@[simp]
theorem omega_zero : ∅ ∈ omega :=
⟨⟨0⟩, Equiv.rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem omega_succ {n} : n ∈ omega.{u} → insert n n ∈ omega.{u} :=
Quotient.inductionOn n fun x ⟨⟨n⟩, h⟩ =>
⟨⟨n + 1⟩,
ZFSet.exact <|
show insert (mk x) (mk x) = insert (mk <| ofNat n) (mk <| ofNat n) by
rw [ZFSet.sound h]
rfl⟩
/-- `{x ∈ a | p x}` is the set of elements in `a` satisfying `p` -/
protected def sep (p : ZFSet → Prop) : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
Quotient.map (PSet.sep fun y => p (mk y))
fun ⟨α, A⟩ ⟨β, B⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨fun ⟨a, pa⟩ =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := αβ a
⟨⟨b, by simpa only [mk_func, ← ZFSet.sound hb]⟩, hb⟩,
fun ⟨b, pb⟩ =>
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := βα b
⟨⟨a, by simpa only [mk_func, ZFSet.sound ha]⟩, ha⟩⟩
-- Porting note: the { x | p x } notation appears to be disabled in Lean 4.
instance : Sep ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.sep⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_sep {p : ZFSet.{u} → Prop} {x y : ZFSet.{u}} :
y ∈ ZFSet.sep p x ↔ y ∈ x ∧ p y :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun _ _ =>
PSet.mem_sep (p := p ∘ mk) fun _ _ h => (Quotient.sound h).subst
@[simp]
theorem sep_empty (p : ZFSet → Prop) : (∅ : ZFSet).sep p = ∅ :=
(eq_empty _).mpr fun _ h ↦ not_mem_empty _ (mem_sep.mp h).1
@[simp]
theorem toSet_sep (a : ZFSet) (p : ZFSet → Prop) :
(ZFSet.sep p a).toSet = { x ∈ a.toSet | p x } := by
ext
simp
/-- The powerset operation, the collection of subsets of a ZFC set -/
def powerset : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
Quotient.map PSet.powerset
fun ⟨_, A⟩ ⟨_, B⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨fun p =>
⟨{ b | ∃ a, p a ∧ Equiv (A a) (B b) }, fun ⟨a, pa⟩ =>
let ⟨b, ab⟩ := αβ a
⟨⟨b, a, pa, ab⟩, ab⟩,
fun ⟨_, a, pa, ab⟩ => ⟨⟨a, pa⟩, ab⟩⟩,
fun q =>
⟨{ a | ∃ b, q b ∧ Equiv (A a) (B b) }, fun ⟨_, b, qb, ab⟩ => ⟨⟨b, qb⟩, ab⟩, fun ⟨b, qb⟩ =>
let ⟨a, ab⟩ := βα b
⟨⟨a, b, qb, ab⟩, ab⟩⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_powerset {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : y ∈ powerset x ↔ y ⊆ x :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun _ _ => PSet.mem_powerset.trans subset_iff.symm
theorem sUnion_lem {α β : Type u} (A : α → PSet) (B : β → PSet) (αβ : ∀ a, ∃ b, Equiv (A a) (B b)) :
∀ a, ∃ b, Equiv ((sUnion ⟨α, A⟩).Func a) ((sUnion ⟨β, B⟩).Func b)
| ⟨a, c⟩ => by
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := αβ a
induction' ea : A a with γ Γ
induction' eb : B b with δ Δ
rw [ea, eb] at hb
obtain ⟨γδ, δγ⟩ := hb
let c : (A a).Type := c
let ⟨d, hd⟩ := γδ (by rwa [ea] at c)
use ⟨b, Eq.ndrec d (Eq.symm eb)⟩
change PSet.Equiv ((A a).Func c) ((B b).Func (Eq.ndrec d eb.symm))
match A a, B b, ea, eb, c, d, hd with
| _, _, rfl, rfl, _, _, hd => exact hd
/-- The union operator, the collection of elements of elements of a ZFC set -/
def sUnion : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
Quotient.map PSet.sUnion
fun ⟨_, A⟩ ⟨_, B⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨sUnion_lem A B αβ, fun a =>
Exists.elim
(sUnion_lem B A (fun b => Exists.elim (βα b) fun c hc => ⟨c, PSet.Equiv.symm hc⟩) a)
fun b hb => ⟨b, PSet.Equiv.symm hb⟩⟩
@[inherit_doc]
prefix:110 "⋃₀ " => ZFSet.sUnion
/-- The intersection operator, the collection of elements in all of the elements of a ZFC set. We
define `⋂₀ ∅ = ∅`. -/
def sInter (x : ZFSet) : ZFSet := (⋃₀ x).sep (fun y => ∀ z ∈ x, y ∈ z)
@[inherit_doc]
prefix:110 "⋂₀ " => ZFSet.sInter
@[simp]
theorem mem_sUnion {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : y ∈ ⋃₀ x ↔ ∃ z ∈ x, y ∈ z :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun _ _ => PSet.mem_sUnion.trans
⟨fun ⟨z, h⟩ => ⟨⟦z⟧, h⟩, fun ⟨z, h⟩ => Quotient.inductionOn z (fun z h => ⟨z, h⟩) h⟩
theorem mem_sInter {x y : ZFSet} (h : x.Nonempty) : y ∈ ⋂₀ x ↔ ∀ z ∈ x, y ∈ z := by
unfold sInter
simp only [and_iff_right_iff_imp, mem_sep]
intro mem
apply mem_sUnion.mpr
replace ⟨s, h⟩ := h
exact ⟨_, h, mem _ h⟩
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_empty : ⋃₀ (∅ : ZFSet.{u}) = ∅ := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem sInter_empty : ⋂₀ (∅ : ZFSet) = ∅ := by simp [sInter]
theorem mem_of_mem_sInter {x y z : ZFSet} (hy : y ∈ ⋂₀ x) (hz : z ∈ x) : y ∈ z := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty x with (rfl | hx)
· exact (not_mem_empty z hz).elim
· exact (mem_sInter hx).1 hy z hz
theorem mem_sUnion_of_mem {x y z : ZFSet} (hy : y ∈ z) (hz : z ∈ x) : y ∈ ⋃₀ x :=
mem_sUnion.2 ⟨z, hz, hy⟩
theorem not_mem_sInter_of_not_mem {x y z : ZFSet} (hy : ¬y ∈ z) (hz : z ∈ x) : ¬y ∈ ⋂₀ x :=
fun hx => hy <| mem_of_mem_sInter hx hz
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_singleton {x : ZFSet.{u}} : ⋃₀ ({x} : ZFSet) = x :=
ext fun y => by simp_rw [mem_sUnion, mem_singleton, exists_eq_left]
@[simp]
theorem sInter_singleton {x : ZFSet.{u}} : ⋂₀ ({x} : ZFSet) = x :=
ext fun y => by simp_rw [mem_sInter (singleton_nonempty x), mem_singleton, forall_eq]
@[simp]
theorem toSet_sUnion (x : ZFSet.{u}) : (⋃₀ x).toSet = ⋃₀ (toSet '' x.toSet) := by
ext
simp
theorem toSet_sInter {x : ZFSet.{u}} (h : x.Nonempty) : (⋂₀ x).toSet = ⋂₀ (toSet '' x.toSet) := by
ext
simp [mem_sInter h]
theorem singleton_injective : Function.Injective (@singleton ZFSet ZFSet _) := fun x y H => by
let this := congr_arg sUnion H
rwa [sUnion_singleton, sUnion_singleton] at this
@[simp]
theorem singleton_inj {x y : ZFSet} : ({x} : ZFSet) = {y} ↔ x = y :=
singleton_injective.eq_iff
/-- The binary union operation -/
protected def union (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
⋃₀ {x, y}
/-- The binary intersection operation -/
protected def inter (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
ZFSet.sep (fun z => z ∈ y) x -- { z ∈ x | z ∈ y }
/-- The set difference operation -/
protected def diff (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
ZFSet.sep (fun z => z ∉ y) x -- { z ∈ x | z ∉ y }
instance : Union ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.union⟩
instance : Inter ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.inter⟩
instance : SDiff ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.diff⟩
@[simp]
theorem toSet_union (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : (x ∪ y).toSet = x.toSet ∪ y.toSet := by
change (⋃₀ {x, y}).toSet = _
simp
@[simp]
theorem toSet_inter (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : (x ∩ y).toSet = x.toSet ∩ y.toSet := by
change (ZFSet.sep (fun z => z ∈ y) x).toSet = _
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem toSet_sdiff (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : (x \ y).toSet = x.toSet \ y.toSet := by
change (ZFSet.sep (fun z => z ∉ y) x).toSet = _
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem mem_union {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : z ∈ x ∪ y ↔ z ∈ x ∨ z ∈ y := by
rw [← mem_toSet]
simp
@[simp]
theorem mem_inter {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : z ∈ x ∩ y ↔ z ∈ x ∧ z ∈ y :=
@mem_sep (fun z : ZFSet.{u} => z ∈ y) x z
@[simp]
theorem mem_diff {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : z ∈ x \ y ↔ z ∈ x ∧ z ∉ y :=
@mem_sep (fun z : ZFSet.{u} => z ∉ y) x z
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_pair {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : ⋃₀ ({x, y} : ZFSet.{u}) = x ∪ y :=
rfl
theorem mem_wf : @WellFounded ZFSet (· ∈ ·) :=
(wellFounded_lift₂_iff (H := fun a b c d hx hy =>
propext ((@Mem.congr_left a c hx).trans (@Mem.congr_right b d hy _)))).mpr PSet.mem_wf
/-- Induction on the `∈` relation. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn {p : ZFSet → Prop} (x) (h : ∀ x, (∀ y ∈ x, p y) → p x) : p x :=
mem_wf.induction x h
instance : IsWellFounded ZFSet (· ∈ ·) :=
⟨mem_wf⟩
instance : WellFoundedRelation ZFSet :=
⟨_, mem_wf⟩
theorem mem_asymm {x y : ZFSet} : x ∈ y → y ∉ x :=
asymm_of (· ∈ ·)
theorem mem_irrefl (x : ZFSet) : x ∉ x :=
irrefl_of (· ∈ ·) x
theorem not_subset_of_mem {x y : ZFSet} (h : x ∈ y) : ¬ y ⊆ x :=
fun h' ↦ mem_irrefl _ (h' h)
theorem not_mem_of_subset {x y : ZFSet} (h : x ⊆ y) : y ∉ x :=
imp_not_comm.2 not_subset_of_mem h
theorem regularity (x : ZFSet.{u}) (h : x ≠ ∅) : ∃ y ∈ x, x ∩ y = ∅ :=
by_contradiction fun ne =>
h <| (eq_empty x).2 fun y =>
@inductionOn (fun z => z ∉ x) y fun z IH zx =>
ne ⟨z, zx, (eq_empty _).2 fun w wxz =>
let ⟨wx, wz⟩ := mem_inter.1 wxz
IH w wz wx⟩
/-- The image of a (definable) ZFC set function -/
def image (f : ZFSet → ZFSet) [Definable₁ f] : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
let r := Definable₁.out f
Quotient.map (PSet.image r)
fun _ _ e =>
Mem.ext fun _ =>
(mem_image (fun _ _ ↦ Definable₁.out_equiv _)).trans <|
Iff.trans
⟨fun ⟨w, h1, h2⟩ => ⟨w, (Mem.congr_right e).1 h1, h2⟩, fun ⟨w, h1, h2⟩ =>
⟨w, (Mem.congr_right e).2 h1, h2⟩⟩ <|
(mem_image (fun _ _ ↦ Definable₁.out_equiv _)).symm
theorem image.mk (f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}) [Definable₁ f] (x) {y} : y ∈ x → f y ∈ image f x :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun ⟨_, _⟩ _ ⟨a, ya⟩ => by
simp only [mk_eq, ← Definable₁.mk_out (f := f)]
exact ⟨a, Definable₁.out_equiv f ya⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_image {f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}} [Definable₁ f] {x y : ZFSet.{u}} :
y ∈ image f x ↔ ∃ z ∈ x, f z = y :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun ⟨_, A⟩ _ =>
⟨fun ⟨a, ya⟩ => ⟨⟦A a⟧, Mem.mk A a, ((Quotient.sound ya).trans Definable₁.mk_out).symm⟩,
fun ⟨_, hz, e⟩ => e ▸ image.mk _ _ hz⟩
@[simp]
theorem toSet_image (f : ZFSet → ZFSet) [Definable₁ f] (x : ZFSet) :
(image f x).toSet = f '' x.toSet := by
ext
simp
/-- The range of a type-indexed family of sets. -/
noncomputable def range {α} [Small.{u} α] (f : α → ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
⟦⟨_, Quotient.out ∘ f ∘ (equivShrink α).symm⟩⟧
@[simp]
theorem mem_range {α} [Small.{u} α] {f : α → ZFSet.{u}} {x : ZFSet.{u}} :
x ∈ range f ↔ x ∈ Set.range f :=
Quotient.inductionOn x fun y => by
constructor
· rintro ⟨z, hz⟩
exact ⟨(equivShrink α).symm z, Quotient.eq_mk_iff_out.2 hz.symm⟩
· rintro ⟨z, hz⟩
use equivShrink α z
simpa [hz] using PSet.Equiv.symm (Quotient.mk_out y)
@[simp]
theorem toSet_range {α} [Small.{u} α] (f : α → ZFSet.{u}) :
(range f).toSet = Set.range f := by
ext
simp
/-- Kuratowski ordered pair -/
def pair (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
{{x}, {x, y}}
@[simp]
theorem toSet_pair (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : (pair x y).toSet = {{x}, {x, y}} := by simp [pair]
/-- A subset of pairs `{(a, b) ∈ x × y | p a b}` -/
def pairSep (p : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → Prop) (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
(powerset (powerset (x ∪ y))).sep fun z => ∃ a ∈ x, ∃ b ∈ y, z = pair a b ∧ p a b
@[simp]
theorem mem_pairSep {p} {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} :
z ∈ pairSep p x y ↔ ∃ a ∈ x, ∃ b ∈ y, z = pair a b ∧ p a b := by
refine mem_sep.trans ⟨And.right, fun e => ⟨?_, e⟩⟩
rcases e with ⟨a, ax, b, bY, rfl, pab⟩
simp only [mem_powerset, subset_def, mem_union, pair, mem_pair]
rintro u (rfl | rfl) v <;> simp only [mem_singleton, mem_pair]
· rintro rfl
exact Or.inl ax
· rintro (rfl | rfl) <;> [left; right] <;> assumption
theorem pair_injective : Function.Injective2 pair := by
intro x x' y y' H
simp_rw [ZFSet.ext_iff, pair, mem_pair] at H
obtain rfl : x = x' := And.left <| by simpa [or_and_left] using (H {x}).1 (Or.inl rfl)
have he : y = x → y = y' := by
rintro rfl
simpa [eq_comm] using H {y, y'}
have hx := H {x, y}
simp_rw [pair_eq_singleton_iff, true_and, or_true, true_iff] at hx
refine ⟨rfl, hx.elim he fun hy ↦ Or.elim ?_ he id⟩
simpa using ZFSet.ext_iff.1 hy y
@[simp]
theorem pair_inj {x y x' y' : ZFSet} : pair x y = pair x' y' ↔ x = x' ∧ y = y' :=
pair_injective.eq_iff
/-- The cartesian product, `{(a, b) | a ∈ x, b ∈ y}` -/
def prod : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} :=
pairSep fun _ _ => True
@[simp]
theorem mem_prod {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : z ∈ prod x y ↔ ∃ a ∈ x, ∃ b ∈ y, z = pair a b := by
simp [prod]
theorem pair_mem_prod {x y a b : ZFSet.{u}} : pair a b ∈ prod x y ↔ a ∈ x ∧ b ∈ y := by
simp
/-- `isFunc x y f` is the assertion that `f` is a subset of `x × y` which relates to each element
of `x` a unique element of `y`, so that we can consider `f` as a ZFC function `x → y`. -/
def IsFunc (x y f : ZFSet.{u}) : Prop :=
f ⊆ prod x y ∧ ∀ z : ZFSet.{u}, z ∈ x → ∃! w, pair z w ∈ f
/-- `funs x y` is `y ^ x`, the set of all set functions `x → y` -/
def funs (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
ZFSet.sep (IsFunc x y) (powerset (prod x y))
@[simp]
theorem mem_funs {x y f : ZFSet.{u}} : f ∈ funs x y ↔ IsFunc x y f := by simp [funs, IsFunc]
instance : Definable₁ ({·}) := .mk ({·}) (fun _ ↦ rfl)
instance : Definable₂ insert := .mk insert (fun _ _ ↦ rfl)
instance : Definable₂ pair := by unfold pair; infer_instance
/-- Graph of a function: `map f x` is the ZFC function which maps `a ∈ x` to `f a` -/
def map (f : ZFSet → ZFSet) [Definable₁ f] : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
image fun y => pair y (f y)
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {f : ZFSet → ZFSet} [Definable₁ f] {x y : ZFSet} :
y ∈ map f x ↔ ∃ z ∈ x, pair z (f z) = y :=
mem_image
theorem map_unique {f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}} [Definable₁ f] {x z : ZFSet.{u}}
(zx : z ∈ x) : ∃! w, pair z w ∈ map f x :=
⟨f z, image.mk _ _ zx, fun y yx => by
let ⟨w, _, we⟩ := mem_image.1 yx
let ⟨wz, fy⟩ := pair_injective we
rw [← fy, wz]⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_isFunc {f : ZFSet → ZFSet} [Definable₁ f] {x y : ZFSet} :
IsFunc x y (map f x) ↔ ∀ z ∈ x, f z ∈ y :=
⟨fun ⟨ss, h⟩ z zx =>
let ⟨_, t1, t2⟩ := h z zx
(t2 (f z) (image.mk _ _ zx)).symm ▸ (pair_mem_prod.1 (ss t1)).right,
fun h =>
⟨fun _ yx =>
let ⟨z, zx, ze⟩ := mem_image.1 yx
ze ▸ pair_mem_prod.2 ⟨zx, h z zx⟩,
fun _ => map_unique⟩⟩
/-- Given a predicate `p` on ZFC sets. `Hereditarily p x` means that `x` has property `p` and the
members of `x` are all `Hereditarily p`. -/
def Hereditarily (p : ZFSet → Prop) (x : ZFSet) : Prop :=
p x ∧ ∀ y ∈ x, Hereditarily p y
termination_by x
section Hereditarily
variable {p : ZFSet.{u} → Prop} {x y : ZFSet.{u}}
theorem hereditarily_iff : Hereditarily p x ↔ p x ∧ ∀ y ∈ x, Hereditarily p y := by
rw [← Hereditarily]
alias ⟨Hereditarily.def, _⟩ := hereditarily_iff
theorem Hereditarily.self (h : x.Hereditarily p) : p x :=
h.def.1
theorem Hereditarily.mem (h : x.Hereditarily p) (hy : y ∈ x) : y.Hereditarily p :=
h.def.2 _ hy
theorem Hereditarily.empty : Hereditarily p x → p ∅ := by
apply @ZFSet.inductionOn _ x
intro y IH h
rcases ZFSet.eq_empty_or_nonempty y with (rfl | ⟨a, ha⟩)
· exact h.self
· exact IH a ha (h.mem ha)
end Hereditarily
end ZFSet
| Mathlib/SetTheory/ZFC/Basic.lean | 1,714 | 1,717 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Support
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Action.Pointwise.Set
/-!
# Support of a function composed with a scalar action
We show that the support of `x ↦ f (c⁻¹ • x)` is equal to `c • support f`.
-/
open Pointwise
open Function Set
section Group
variable {α β γ : Type*} [Group α] [MulAction α β]
theorem mulSupport_comp_inv_smul [One γ] (c : α) (f : β → γ) :
(mulSupport fun x ↦ f (c⁻¹ • x)) = c • mulSupport f := by
| ext x
simp only [mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem, mem_mulSupport]
/- Note: to_additive also automatically translates `SMul` to `VAdd`, so we give the additive version
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Pointwise/Support.lean | 26 | 29 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.ZeroCons
/-!
# Basic results on multisets
-/
-- No algebra should be required
assert_not_exists Monoid
universe v
open List Subtype Nat Function
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type v} {γ : Type*}
namespace Multiset
/-! ### `Multiset.toList` -/
section ToList
/-- Produces a list of the elements in the multiset using choice. -/
noncomputable def toList (s : Multiset α) :=
s.out
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_toList (s : Multiset α) : (s.toList : Multiset α) = s :=
s.out_eq'
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_nil {s : Multiset α} : s.toList = [] ↔ s = 0 := by
rw [← coe_eq_zero, coe_toList]
theorem empty_toList {s : Multiset α} : s.toList.isEmpty ↔ s = 0 := by simp
@[simp]
theorem toList_zero : (Multiset.toList 0 : List α) = [] :=
toList_eq_nil.mpr rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_toList {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ s.toList ↔ a ∈ s := by
rw [← mem_coe, coe_toList]
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_singleton_iff {a : α} {m : Multiset α} : m.toList = [a] ↔ m = {a} := by
rw [← perm_singleton, ← coe_eq_coe, coe_toList, coe_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem toList_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Multiset α).toList = [a] :=
Multiset.toList_eq_singleton_iff.2 rfl
@[simp]
theorem length_toList (s : Multiset α) : s.toList.length = card s := by
rw [← coe_card, coe_toList]
end ToList
/-! ### Induction principles -/
/-- The strong induction principle for multisets. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (ih : ∀ s, (∀ t < s, p t) → p s) :
p s :=
(ih s) fun t _h =>
strongInductionOn t ih
termination_by card s
decreasing_by exact card_lt_card _h
theorem strongInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (H) :
@strongInductionOn _ p s H = H s fun t _h => @strongInductionOn _ p t H := by
rw [strongInductionOn]
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem case_strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Prop} (s : Multiset α) (h₀ : p 0)
(h₁ : ∀ a s, (∀ t ≤ s, p t) → p (a ::ₘ s)) : p s :=
Multiset.strongInductionOn s fun s =>
Multiset.induction_on s (fun _ => h₀) fun _a _s _ ih =>
(h₁ _ _) fun _t h => ih _ <| lt_of_le_of_lt h <| lt_cons_self _ _
/-- Suppose that, given that `p t` can be defined on all supersets of `s` of cardinality less than
`n`, one knows how to define `p s`. Then one can inductively define `p s` for all multisets `s` of
cardinality less than `n`, starting from multisets of card `n` and iterating. This
can be used either to define data, or to prove properties. -/
def strongDownwardInduction {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
card s ≤ n → p s :=
H s fun {t} ht _h =>
strongDownwardInduction H t ht
termination_by n - card s
decreasing_by simp_wf; have := (card_lt_card _h); omega
theorem strongDownwardInduction_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
strongDownwardInduction H s = H s fun ht _hst => strongDownwardInduction H _ ht := by
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
/-- Analogue of `strongDownwardInduction` with order of arguments swapped. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongDownwardInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ} :
∀ s : Multiset α,
(∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) →
card s ≤ n → p s :=
fun s H => strongDownwardInduction H s
theorem strongDownwardInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) :
s.strongDownwardInductionOn H = H s fun {t} ht _h => t.strongDownwardInductionOn H ht := by
dsimp only [strongDownwardInductionOn]
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : Multiset α)
/-- Given a proof `hp` that there exists a unique `a ∈ l` such that `p a`, `chooseX p l hp` returns
that `a` together with proofs of `a ∈ l` and `p a`. -/
def chooseX : ∀ _hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a, { a // a ∈ l ∧ p a } :=
Quotient.recOn l (fun l' ex_unique => List.chooseX p l' (ExistsUnique.exists ex_unique))
(by
intros a b _
funext hp
suffices all_equal : ∀ x y : { t // t ∈ b ∧ p t }, x = y by
apply all_equal
rintro ⟨x, px⟩ ⟨y, py⟩
rcases hp with ⟨z, ⟨_z_mem_l, _pz⟩, z_unique⟩
congr
calc
x = z := z_unique x px
_ = y := (z_unique y py).symm
)
/-- Given a proof `hp` that there exists a unique `a ∈ l` such that `p a`, `choose p l hp` returns
that `a`. -/
def choose (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : α :=
chooseX p l hp
theorem choose_spec (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(chooseX p l hp).property
theorem choose_mem (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).1
theorem choose_property (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).2
end Choose
variable (α) in
/-- The equivalence between lists and multisets of a subsingleton type. -/
def subsingletonEquiv [Subsingleton α] : List α ≃ Multiset α where
toFun := ofList
invFun :=
(Quot.lift id) fun (a b : List α) (h : a ~ b) =>
(List.ext_get h.length_eq) fun _ _ _ => Subsingleton.elim _ _
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv m := Quot.inductionOn m fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_subsingletonEquiv [Subsingleton α] :
(subsingletonEquiv α : List α → Multiset α) = ofList :=
rfl
section SizeOf
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {s : Multiset α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf s := by
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
exact List.sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem hx
end SizeOf
end Multiset
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Basic.lean | 2,777 | 2,782 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.IndicatorFunction
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Order
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.AEEqFun
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSeminorm.Defs
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SpecialFunctions.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.Countable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.Sub
/-!
# Basic theorems about ℒp space
-/
noncomputable section
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory Filter
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology ComplexConjugate
variable {α ε ε' E F G : Type*} {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {p : ℝ≥0∞} {q : ℝ} {μ ν : Measure α}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedAddCommGroup G] [ENorm ε] [ENorm ε']
namespace MeasureTheory
section Lp
section Top
theorem MemLp.eLpNorm_lt_top [TopologicalSpace ε] {f : α → ε} (hfp : MemLp f p μ) :
eLpNorm f p μ < ∞ :=
hfp.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias Memℒp.eLpNorm_lt_top := MemLp.eLpNorm_lt_top
theorem MemLp.eLpNorm_ne_top [TopologicalSpace ε] {f : α → ε} (hfp : MemLp f p μ) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≠ ∞ :=
ne_of_lt hfp.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias Memℒp.eLpNorm_ne_top := MemLp.eLpNorm_ne_top
theorem lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm'_lt_top {f : α → ε} (hq0_lt : 0 < q)
(hfq : eLpNorm' f q μ < ∞) : ∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖ₑ ^ q ∂μ < ∞ := by
rw [lintegral_rpow_enorm_eq_rpow_eLpNorm' hq0_lt]
exact ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hq0_lt) (ne_of_lt hfq)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")]
alias lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm'_lt_top' :=
lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm'_lt_top
theorem lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm_lt_top {f : α → ε} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0)
(hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) (hfp : eLpNorm f p μ < ∞) : ∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖ₑ ^ p.toReal ∂μ < ∞ := by
apply lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm'_lt_top
· exact ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
· simpa [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top] using hfp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")]
alias lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm_lt_top :=
lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm_lt_top
theorem eLpNorm_lt_top_iff_lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top {f : α → ε} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0)
(hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) : eLpNorm f p μ < ∞ ↔ ∫⁻ a, (‖f a‖ₑ) ^ p.toReal ∂μ < ∞ :=
⟨lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm_lt_top hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top, by
intro h
have hp' := ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
have : 0 < 1 / p.toReal := div_pos zero_lt_one hp'
simpa [eLpNorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_enorm hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top] using
ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (le_of_lt this) (ne_of_lt h)⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-04")] alias
eLpNorm_lt_top_iff_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top := eLpNorm_lt_top_iff_lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top
end Top
section Zero
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm'_exponent_zero {f : α → ε} : eLpNorm' f 0 μ = 1 := by
rw [eLpNorm', div_zero, ENNReal.rpow_zero]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_exponent_zero {f : α → ε} : eLpNorm f 0 μ = 0 := by simp [eLpNorm]
@[simp]
theorem memLp_zero_iff_aestronglyMeasurable [TopologicalSpace ε] {f : α → ε} :
MemLp f 0 μ ↔ AEStronglyMeasurable f μ := by simp [MemLp, eLpNorm_exponent_zero]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_zero_iff_aestronglyMeasurable := memLp_zero_iff_aestronglyMeasurable
section ENormedAddMonoid
variable {ε : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ε] [ENormedAddMonoid ε]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm'_zero (hp0_lt : 0 < q) : eLpNorm' (0 : α → ε) q μ = 0 := by
simp [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm, hp0_lt]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm'_zero' (hq0_ne : q ≠ 0) (hμ : μ ≠ 0) : eLpNorm' (0 : α → ε) q μ = 0 := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 q with hq0 | hq_neg
· exact eLpNorm'_zero (lt_of_le_of_ne hq0 hq0_ne.symm)
· simp [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm, ENNReal.rpow_eq_zero_iff, hμ, hq_neg]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNormEssSup_zero : eLpNormEssSup (0 : α → ε) μ = 0 := by
simp [eLpNormEssSup, ← bot_eq_zero', essSup_const_bot]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_zero : eLpNorm (0 : α → ε) p μ = 0 := by
by_cases h0 : p = 0
· simp [h0]
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· simp only [h_top, eLpNorm_exponent_top, eLpNormEssSup_zero]
rw [← Ne] at h0
simp [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' h0 h_top, ENNReal.toReal_pos h0 h_top]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_zero' : eLpNorm (fun _ : α => (0 : ε)) p μ = 0 := eLpNorm_zero
@[simp] lemma MemLp.zero : MemLp (0 : α → ε) p μ :=
⟨aestronglyMeasurable_zero, by rw [eLpNorm_zero]; exact ENNReal.coe_lt_top⟩
@[simp] lemma MemLp.zero' : MemLp (fun _ : α => (0 : ε)) p μ := MemLp.zero
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias Memℒp.zero' := MemLp.zero'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias zero_memℒp := MemLp.zero
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias zero_mem_ℒp := MemLp.zero'
variable [MeasurableSpace α]
theorem eLpNorm'_measure_zero_of_pos {f : α → ε} (hq_pos : 0 < q) :
eLpNorm' f q (0 : Measure α) = 0 := by simp [eLpNorm', hq_pos]
theorem eLpNorm'_measure_zero_of_exponent_zero {f : α → ε} : eLpNorm' f 0 (0 : Measure α) = 1 := by
simp [eLpNorm']
theorem eLpNorm'_measure_zero_of_neg {f : α → ε} (hq_neg : q < 0) :
eLpNorm' f q (0 : Measure α) = ∞ := by simp [eLpNorm', hq_neg]
end ENormedAddMonoid
@[simp]
theorem eLpNormEssSup_measure_zero {f : α → ε} : eLpNormEssSup f (0 : Measure α) = 0 := by
simp [eLpNormEssSup]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_measure_zero {f : α → ε} : eLpNorm f p (0 : Measure α) = 0 := by
by_cases h0 : p = 0
· simp [h0]
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· simp [h_top]
rw [← Ne] at h0
simp [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' h0 h_top, eLpNorm', ENNReal.toReal_pos h0 h_top]
section ContinuousENorm
variable {ε : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ε] [ContinuousENorm ε]
@[simp] lemma memLp_measure_zero {f : α → ε} : MemLp f p (0 : Measure α) := by
simp [MemLp]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_measure_zero := memLp_measure_zero
end ContinuousENorm
end Zero
section Neg
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm'_neg (f : α → F) (q : ℝ) (μ : Measure α) : eLpNorm' (-f) q μ = eLpNorm' f q μ := by
simp [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_neg (f : α → F) (p : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) : eLpNorm (-f) p μ = eLpNorm f p μ := by
by_cases h0 : p = 0
· simp [h0]
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· simp [h_top, eLpNormEssSup_eq_essSup_enorm]
simp [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' h0 h_top]
lemma eLpNorm_sub_comm (f g : α → E) (p : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) :
eLpNorm (f - g) p μ = eLpNorm (g - f) p μ := by simp [← eLpNorm_neg (f := f - g)]
theorem MemLp.neg {f : α → E} (hf : MemLp f p μ) : MemLp (-f) p μ :=
⟨AEStronglyMeasurable.neg hf.1, by simp [hf.right]⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias Memℒp.neg := MemLp.neg
theorem memLp_neg_iff {f : α → E} : MemLp (-f) p μ ↔ MemLp f p μ :=
⟨fun h => neg_neg f ▸ h.neg, MemLp.neg⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_neg_iff := memLp_neg_iff
end Neg
section Const
variable {ε' ε'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ε'] [ContinuousENorm ε']
[TopologicalSpace ε''] [ENormedAddMonoid ε'']
theorem eLpNorm'_const (c : ε) (hq_pos : 0 < q) :
eLpNorm' (fun _ : α => c) q μ = ‖c‖ₑ * μ Set.univ ^ (1 / q) := by
rw [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm, lintegral_const,
ENNReal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ (by simp [hq_pos.le] : 0 ≤ 1 / q)]
congr
rw [← ENNReal.rpow_mul]
suffices hq_cancel : q * (1 / q) = 1 by rw [hq_cancel, ENNReal.rpow_one]
rw [one_div, mul_inv_cancel₀ (ne_of_lt hq_pos).symm]
-- Generalising this to ENormedAddMonoid requires a case analysis whether ‖c‖ₑ = ⊤,
-- and will happen in a future PR.
theorem eLpNorm'_const' [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (c : F) (hc_ne_zero : c ≠ 0) (hq_ne_zero : q ≠ 0) :
eLpNorm' (fun _ : α => c) q μ = ‖c‖ₑ * μ Set.univ ^ (1 / q) := by
rw [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm, lintegral_const,
ENNReal.mul_rpow_of_ne_top _ (measure_ne_top μ Set.univ)]
· congr
rw [← ENNReal.rpow_mul]
suffices hp_cancel : q * (1 / q) = 1 by rw [hp_cancel, ENNReal.rpow_one]
rw [one_div, mul_inv_cancel₀ hq_ne_zero]
· rw [Ne, ENNReal.rpow_eq_top_iff, not_or, not_and_or, not_and_or]
simp [hc_ne_zero]
theorem eLpNormEssSup_const (c : ε) (hμ : μ ≠ 0) : eLpNormEssSup (fun _ : α => c) μ = ‖c‖ₑ := by
rw [eLpNormEssSup_eq_essSup_enorm, essSup_const _ hμ]
theorem eLpNorm'_const_of_isProbabilityMeasure (c : ε) (hq_pos : 0 < q) [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] :
eLpNorm' (fun _ : α => c) q μ = ‖c‖ₑ := by simp [eLpNorm'_const c hq_pos, measure_univ]
theorem eLpNorm_const (c : ε) (h0 : p ≠ 0) (hμ : μ ≠ 0) :
eLpNorm (fun _ : α => c) p μ = ‖c‖ₑ * μ Set.univ ^ (1 / ENNReal.toReal p) := by
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· simp [h_top, eLpNormEssSup_const c hμ]
simp [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' h0 h_top, eLpNorm'_const, ENNReal.toReal_pos h0 h_top]
theorem eLpNorm_const' (c : ε) (h0 : p ≠ 0) (h_top : p ≠ ∞) :
eLpNorm (fun _ : α => c) p μ = ‖c‖ₑ * μ Set.univ ^ (1 / ENNReal.toReal p) := by
simp [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' h0 h_top, eLpNorm'_const, ENNReal.toReal_pos h0 h_top]
-- NB. If ‖c‖ₑ = ∞ and μ is finite, this claim is false: the right has side is true,
-- but the left hand side is false (as the norm is infinite).
theorem eLpNorm_const_lt_top_iff_enorm {c : ε''} (hc' : ‖c‖ₑ ≠ ∞)
{p : ℝ≥0∞} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
eLpNorm (fun _ : α ↦ c) p μ < ∞ ↔ c = 0 ∨ μ Set.univ < ∞ := by
have hp : 0 < p.toReal := ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
by_cases hμ : μ = 0
· simp only [hμ, Measure.coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply, or_true, ENNReal.zero_lt_top,
eLpNorm_measure_zero]
by_cases hc : c = 0
· simp only [hc, true_or, eq_self_iff_true, ENNReal.zero_lt_top, eLpNorm_zero']
rw [eLpNorm_const' c hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top]
obtain hμ_top | hμ_ne_top := eq_or_ne (μ .univ) ∞
· simp [hc, hμ_top, hp]
rw [ENNReal.mul_lt_top_iff]
simpa [hμ, hc, hμ_ne_top, hμ_ne_top.lt_top, hc, hc'.lt_top] using
ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (inv_nonneg.mpr hp.le) hμ_ne_top
theorem eLpNorm_const_lt_top_iff {p : ℝ≥0∞} {c : F} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
eLpNorm (fun _ : α => c) p μ < ∞ ↔ c = 0 ∨ μ Set.univ < ∞ :=
eLpNorm_const_lt_top_iff_enorm enorm_ne_top hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
theorem memLp_const_enorm {c : ε'} (hc : ‖c‖ₑ ≠ ⊤) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] :
MemLp (fun _ : α ↦ c) p μ := by
refine ⟨aestronglyMeasurable_const, ?_⟩
by_cases h0 : p = 0
· simp [h0]
by_cases hμ : μ = 0
· simp [hμ]
rw [eLpNorm_const c h0 hμ]
exact ENNReal.mul_lt_top hc.lt_top (ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (by simp)
(measure_ne_top μ Set.univ))
theorem memLp_const (c : E) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] : MemLp (fun _ : α => c) p μ :=
memLp_const_enorm enorm_ne_top
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_const := memLp_const
theorem memLp_top_const_enorm {c : ε'} (hc : ‖c‖ₑ ≠ ⊤) :
MemLp (fun _ : α ↦ c) ∞ μ :=
⟨aestronglyMeasurable_const, by by_cases h : μ = 0 <;> simp [eLpNorm_const _, h, hc.lt_top]⟩
theorem memLp_top_const (c : E) : MemLp (fun _ : α => c) ∞ μ :=
memLp_top_const_enorm enorm_ne_top
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_top_const := memLp_top_const
theorem memLp_const_iff_enorm
{p : ℝ≥0∞} {c : ε''} (hc : ‖c‖ₑ ≠ ⊤) (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
MemLp (fun _ : α ↦ c) p μ ↔ c = 0 ∨ μ Set.univ < ∞ := by
simp_all [MemLp, aestronglyMeasurable_const,
eLpNorm_const_lt_top_iff_enorm hc hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top]
theorem memLp_const_iff {p : ℝ≥0∞} {c : E} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
MemLp (fun _ : α => c) p μ ↔ c = 0 ∨ μ Set.univ < ∞ :=
memLp_const_iff_enorm enorm_ne_top hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_const_iff := memLp_const_iff
end Const
variable {f : α → F}
lemma eLpNorm'_mono_enorm_ae {f : α → ε} {g : α → ε'} (hq : 0 ≤ q) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ₑ ≤ ‖g x‖ₑ) :
eLpNorm' f q μ ≤ eLpNorm' g q μ := by
simp only [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm]
gcongr ?_ ^ (1/q)
refine lintegral_mono_ae (h.mono fun x hx => ?_)
gcongr
lemma eLpNorm'_mono_nnnorm_ae {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (hq : 0 ≤ q) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ ‖g x‖₊) :
eLpNorm' f q μ ≤ eLpNorm' g q μ := by
simp only [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm]
gcongr ?_ ^ (1/q)
refine lintegral_mono_ae (h.mono fun x hx => ?_)
dsimp [enorm]
gcongr
theorem eLpNorm'_mono_ae {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (hq : 0 ≤ q) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) :
eLpNorm' f q μ ≤ eLpNorm' g q μ :=
eLpNorm'_mono_enorm_ae hq (by simpa only [enorm_le_iff_norm_le] using h)
theorem eLpNorm'_congr_enorm_ae {f g : α → ε} (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ₑ = ‖g x‖ₑ) :
eLpNorm' f q μ = eLpNorm' g q μ := by
have : (‖f ·‖ₑ ^ q) =ᵐ[μ] (‖g ·‖ₑ ^ q) := hfg.mono fun x hx ↦ by simp [hx]
simp only [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm, lintegral_congr_ae this]
theorem eLpNorm'_congr_nnnorm_ae {f g : α → F} (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ = ‖g x‖₊) :
eLpNorm' f q μ = eLpNorm' g q μ := by
have : (‖f ·‖ₑ ^ q) =ᵐ[μ] (‖g ·‖ₑ ^ q) := hfg.mono fun x hx ↦ by simp [enorm, hx]
simp only [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm, lintegral_congr_ae this]
theorem eLpNorm'_congr_norm_ae {f g : α → F} (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ = ‖g x‖) :
eLpNorm' f q μ = eLpNorm' g q μ :=
eLpNorm'_congr_nnnorm_ae <| hfg.mono fun _x hx => NNReal.eq hx
theorem eLpNorm'_congr_ae {f g : α → ε} (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : eLpNorm' f q μ = eLpNorm' g q μ :=
eLpNorm'_congr_enorm_ae (hfg.fun_comp _)
theorem eLpNormEssSup_congr_ae {f g : α → ε} (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
eLpNormEssSup f μ = eLpNormEssSup g μ :=
essSup_congr_ae (hfg.fun_comp enorm)
theorem eLpNormEssSup_mono_enorm_ae {f g : α → ε} (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ₑ ≤ ‖g x‖ₑ) :
eLpNormEssSup f μ ≤ eLpNormEssSup g μ :=
essSup_mono_ae <| hfg
theorem eLpNormEssSup_mono_nnnorm_ae {f g : α → F} (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ ‖g x‖₊) :
eLpNormEssSup f μ ≤ eLpNormEssSup g μ :=
essSup_mono_ae <| hfg.mono fun _x hx => ENNReal.coe_le_coe.mpr hx
theorem eLpNorm_mono_enorm_ae {f : α → ε} {g : α → ε'} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ₑ ≤ ‖g x‖ₑ) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≤ eLpNorm g p μ := by
simp only [eLpNorm]
split_ifs
· exact le_rfl
· exact essSup_mono_ae h
· exact eLpNorm'_mono_enorm_ae ENNReal.toReal_nonneg h
theorem eLpNorm_mono_nnnorm_ae {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ ‖g x‖₊) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≤ eLpNorm g p μ := by
simp only [eLpNorm]
split_ifs
· exact le_rfl
· exact essSup_mono_ae (h.mono fun x hx => ENNReal.coe_le_coe.mpr hx)
· exact eLpNorm'_mono_nnnorm_ae ENNReal.toReal_nonneg h
theorem eLpNorm_mono_ae {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≤ eLpNorm g p μ :=
eLpNorm_mono_enorm_ae (by simpa only [enorm_le_iff_norm_le] using h)
theorem eLpNorm_mono_ae' {ε' : Type*} [ENorm ε']
{f : α → ε} {g : α → ε'} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ₑ ≤ ‖g x‖ₑ) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≤ eLpNorm g p μ :=
eLpNorm_mono_enorm_ae (by simpa only [enorm_le_iff_norm_le] using h)
theorem eLpNorm_mono_ae_real {f : α → F} {g : α → ℝ} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ g x) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≤ eLpNorm g p μ :=
eLpNorm_mono_ae <| h.mono fun _x hx =>
hx.trans ((le_abs_self _).trans (Real.norm_eq_abs _).symm.le)
theorem eLpNorm_mono_enorm {f : α → ε} {g : α → ε'} (h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ₑ ≤ ‖g x‖ₑ) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≤ eLpNorm g p μ :=
eLpNorm_mono_enorm_ae (Eventually.of_forall h)
theorem eLpNorm_mono_nnnorm {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ ‖g x‖₊) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≤ eLpNorm g p μ :=
eLpNorm_mono_nnnorm_ae (Eventually.of_forall h)
theorem eLpNorm_mono {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≤ eLpNorm g p μ :=
eLpNorm_mono_ae (Eventually.of_forall h)
theorem eLpNorm_mono_real {f : α → F} {g : α → ℝ} (h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ g x) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≤ eLpNorm g p μ :=
eLpNorm_mono_ae_real (Eventually.of_forall h)
theorem eLpNormEssSup_le_of_ae_enorm_bound {f : α → ε} {C : ℝ≥0∞} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ₑ ≤ C) :
eLpNormEssSup f μ ≤ C :=
essSup_le_of_ae_le C hfC
theorem eLpNormEssSup_le_of_ae_nnnorm_bound {f : α → F} {C : ℝ≥0} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ C) :
eLpNormEssSup f μ ≤ C :=
essSup_le_of_ae_le (C : ℝ≥0∞) <| hfC.mono fun _x hx => ENNReal.coe_le_coe.mpr hx
theorem eLpNormEssSup_le_of_ae_bound {f : α → F} {C : ℝ} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) :
eLpNormEssSup f μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal C :=
eLpNormEssSup_le_of_ae_nnnorm_bound <| hfC.mono fun _x hx => hx.trans C.le_coe_toNNReal
theorem eLpNormEssSup_lt_top_of_ae_enorm_bound {f : α → ε} {C : ℝ≥0} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ₑ ≤ C) :
eLpNormEssSup f μ < ∞ :=
(eLpNormEssSup_le_of_ae_enorm_bound hfC).trans_lt ENNReal.coe_lt_top
theorem eLpNormEssSup_lt_top_of_ae_nnnorm_bound {f : α → F} {C : ℝ≥0} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ C) :
eLpNormEssSup f μ < ∞ :=
(eLpNormEssSup_le_of_ae_nnnorm_bound hfC).trans_lt ENNReal.coe_lt_top
theorem eLpNormEssSup_lt_top_of_ae_bound {f : α → F} {C : ℝ} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) :
eLpNormEssSup f μ < ∞ :=
(eLpNormEssSup_le_of_ae_bound hfC).trans_lt ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top
theorem eLpNorm_le_of_ae_enorm_bound {ε} [TopologicalSpace ε] [ENormedAddMonoid ε]
{f : α → ε} {C : ℝ≥0∞} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ₑ ≤ C) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≤ C • μ Set.univ ^ p.toReal⁻¹ := by
rcases eq_zero_or_neZero μ with rfl | hμ
· simp
by_cases hp : p = 0
· simp [hp]
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ₑ ≤ ‖C‖ₑ := hfC.mono fun x hx ↦ hx.trans (Preorder.le_refl C)
refine (eLpNorm_mono_enorm_ae this).trans_eq ?_
rw [eLpNorm_const _ hp (NeZero.ne μ), one_div, enorm_eq_self, smul_eq_mul]
theorem eLpNorm_le_of_ae_nnnorm_bound {f : α → F} {C : ℝ≥0} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ C) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≤ C • μ Set.univ ^ p.toReal⁻¹ := by
rcases eq_zero_or_neZero μ with rfl | hμ
· simp
by_cases hp : p = 0
· simp [hp]
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ ‖(C : ℝ)‖₊ := hfC.mono fun x hx => hx.trans_eq C.nnnorm_eq.symm
refine (eLpNorm_mono_ae this).trans_eq ?_
rw [eLpNorm_const _ hp (NeZero.ne μ), C.enorm_eq, one_div, ENNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul]
theorem eLpNorm_le_of_ae_bound {f : α → F} {C : ℝ} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≤ μ Set.univ ^ p.toReal⁻¹ * ENNReal.ofReal C := by
rw [← mul_comm]
exact eLpNorm_le_of_ae_nnnorm_bound (hfC.mono fun x hx => hx.trans C.le_coe_toNNReal)
theorem eLpNorm_congr_enorm_ae {f : α → ε} {g : α → ε'} (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ₑ = ‖g x‖ₑ) :
eLpNorm f p μ = eLpNorm g p μ :=
le_antisymm (eLpNorm_mono_enorm_ae <| EventuallyEq.le hfg)
(eLpNorm_mono_enorm_ae <| (EventuallyEq.symm hfg).le)
theorem eLpNorm_congr_nnnorm_ae {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ = ‖g x‖₊) :
eLpNorm f p μ = eLpNorm g p μ :=
le_antisymm (eLpNorm_mono_nnnorm_ae <| EventuallyEq.le hfg)
(eLpNorm_mono_nnnorm_ae <| (EventuallyEq.symm hfg).le)
theorem eLpNorm_congr_norm_ae {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ = ‖g x‖) :
eLpNorm f p μ = eLpNorm g p μ :=
eLpNorm_congr_nnnorm_ae <| hfg.mono fun _x hx => NNReal.eq hx
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem eLpNorm_indicator_sub_indicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → E) :
eLpNorm (s.indicator f - t.indicator f) p μ = eLpNorm ((s ∆ t).indicator f) p μ :=
eLpNorm_congr_norm_ae <| ae_of_all _ fun x ↦ by simp [Set.apply_indicator_symmDiff norm_neg]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm'_norm {f : α → F} : eLpNorm' (fun a => ‖f a‖) q μ = eLpNorm' f q μ := by
simp [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm'_enorm {f : α → ε} : eLpNorm' (fun a => ‖f a‖ₑ) q μ = eLpNorm' f q μ := by
simp [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_norm (f : α → F) : eLpNorm (fun x => ‖f x‖) p μ = eLpNorm f p μ :=
eLpNorm_congr_norm_ae <| Eventually.of_forall fun _ => norm_norm _
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_enorm (f : α → ε) : eLpNorm (fun x ↦ ‖f x‖ₑ) p μ = eLpNorm f p μ :=
eLpNorm_congr_enorm_ae <| Eventually.of_forall fun _ => enorm_enorm _
|
theorem eLpNorm'_norm_rpow (f : α → F) (p q : ℝ) (hq_pos : 0 < q) :
eLpNorm' (fun x => ‖f x‖ ^ q) p μ = eLpNorm' f (p * q) μ ^ q := by
simp_rw [eLpNorm', ← ENNReal.rpow_mul, ← one_div_mul_one_div, one_div,
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/LpSeminorm/Basic.lean | 495 | 498 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Rémi Bottinelli. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémi Bottinelli, Junyan Xu
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Defs
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Groupoid.VertexGroup
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Groupoid.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Groupoid
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
/-!
# Subgroupoid
This file defines subgroupoids as `structure`s containing the subsets of arrows and their
stability under composition and inversion.
Also defined are:
* containment of subgroupoids is a complete lattice;
* images and preimages of subgroupoids under a functor;
* the notion of normality of subgroupoids and its stability under intersection and preimage;
* compatibility of the above with `CategoryTheory.Groupoid.vertexGroup`.
## Main definitions
Given a type `C` with associated `groupoid C` instance.
* `CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid C` is the type of subgroupoids of `C`
* `CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.IsNormal` is the property that the subgroupoid is stable under
conjugation by arbitrary arrows, _and_ that all identity arrows are contained in the subgroupoid.
* `CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.comap` is the "preimage" map of subgroupoids along a functor.
* `CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.map` is the "image" map of subgroupoids along a functor _injective on
objects_.
* `CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.vertexSubgroup` is the subgroup of the *vertex group* at a given
vertex `v`, assuming `v` is contained in the `CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid` (meaning, by definition,
that the arrow `𝟙 v` is contained in the subgroupoid).
## Implementation details
The structure of this file is copied from/inspired by `Mathlib/GroupTheory/Subgroup/Basic.lean`
and `Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Subgraph.lean`.
## TODO
* Equivalent inductive characterization of generated (normal) subgroupoids.
* Characterization of normal subgroupoids as kernels.
* Prove that `CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.full` and `CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.disconnect` preserve
intersections (and `CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.disconnect` also unions)
## Tags
category theory, groupoid, subgroupoid
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open Set Groupoid
universe u v
variable {C : Type u} [Groupoid C]
/-- A sugroupoid of `C` consists of a choice of arrows for each pair of vertices, closed
under composition and inverses.
-/
@[ext]
structure Subgroupoid (C : Type u) [Groupoid C] where
/-- The arrow choice for each pair of vertices -/
arrows : ∀ c d : C, Set (c ⟶ d)
protected inv : ∀ {c d} {p : c ⟶ d}, p ∈ arrows c d → Groupoid.inv p ∈ arrows d c
protected mul : ∀ {c d e} {p}, p ∈ arrows c d → ∀ {q}, q ∈ arrows d e → p ≫ q ∈ arrows c e
namespace Subgroupoid
variable (S : Subgroupoid C)
theorem inv_mem_iff {c d : C} (f : c ⟶ d) :
Groupoid.inv f ∈ S.arrows d c ↔ f ∈ S.arrows c d := by
constructor
· intro h
simpa only [inv_eq_inv, IsIso.inv_inv] using S.inv h
· apply S.inv
theorem mul_mem_cancel_left {c d e : C} {f : c ⟶ d} {g : d ⟶ e} (hf : f ∈ S.arrows c d) :
f ≫ g ∈ S.arrows c e ↔ g ∈ S.arrows d e := by
constructor
· rintro h
suffices Groupoid.inv f ≫ f ≫ g ∈ S.arrows d e by
simpa only [inv_eq_inv, IsIso.inv_hom_id_assoc] using this
apply S.mul (S.inv hf) h
· apply S.mul hf
theorem mul_mem_cancel_right {c d e : C} {f : c ⟶ d} {g : d ⟶ e} (hg : g ∈ S.arrows d e) :
f ≫ g ∈ S.arrows c e ↔ f ∈ S.arrows c d := by
constructor
· rintro h
suffices (f ≫ g) ≫ Groupoid.inv g ∈ S.arrows c d by
simpa only [inv_eq_inv, IsIso.hom_inv_id, Category.comp_id, Category.assoc] using this
apply S.mul h (S.inv hg)
· exact fun hf => S.mul hf hg
/-- The vertices of `C` on which `S` has non-trivial isotropy -/
def objs : Set C :=
{c : C | (S.arrows c c).Nonempty}
theorem mem_objs_of_src {c d : C} {f : c ⟶ d} (h : f ∈ S.arrows c d) : c ∈ S.objs :=
⟨f ≫ Groupoid.inv f, S.mul h (S.inv h)⟩
theorem mem_objs_of_tgt {c d : C} {f : c ⟶ d} (h : f ∈ S.arrows c d) : d ∈ S.objs :=
⟨Groupoid.inv f ≫ f, S.mul (S.inv h) h⟩
theorem id_mem_of_nonempty_isotropy (c : C) : c ∈ objs S → 𝟙 c ∈ S.arrows c c := by
rintro ⟨γ, hγ⟩
convert S.mul hγ (S.inv hγ)
simp only [inv_eq_inv, IsIso.hom_inv_id]
theorem id_mem_of_src {c d : C} {f : c ⟶ d} (h : f ∈ S.arrows c d) : 𝟙 c ∈ S.arrows c c :=
id_mem_of_nonempty_isotropy S c (mem_objs_of_src S h)
theorem id_mem_of_tgt {c d : C} {f : c ⟶ d} (h : f ∈ S.arrows c d) : 𝟙 d ∈ S.arrows d d :=
id_mem_of_nonempty_isotropy S d (mem_objs_of_tgt S h)
/-- A subgroupoid seen as a quiver on vertex set `C` -/
def asWideQuiver : Quiver C :=
⟨fun c d => Subtype <| S.arrows c d⟩
/-- The coercion of a subgroupoid as a groupoid -/
@[simps comp_coe, simps -isSimp inv_coe]
instance coe : Groupoid S.objs where
Hom a b := S.arrows a.val b.val
id a := ⟨𝟙 a.val, id_mem_of_nonempty_isotropy S a.val a.prop⟩
comp p q := ⟨p.val ≫ q.val, S.mul p.prop q.prop⟩
inv p := ⟨Groupoid.inv p.val, S.inv p.prop⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_inv_coe' {c d : S.objs} (p : c ⟶ d) :
(CategoryTheory.inv p).val = CategoryTheory.inv p.val := by
simp only [← inv_eq_inv, coe_inv_coe]
/-- The embedding of the coerced subgroupoid to its parent -/
def hom : S.objs ⥤ C where
obj c := c.val
map f := f.val
map_id _ := rfl
map_comp _ _ := rfl
theorem hom.inj_on_objects : Function.Injective (hom S).obj := by
rintro ⟨c, hc⟩ ⟨d, hd⟩ hcd
simp only [Subtype.mk_eq_mk]; exact hcd
theorem hom.faithful : ∀ c d, Function.Injective fun f : c ⟶ d => (hom S).map f := by
rintro ⟨c, hc⟩ ⟨d, hd⟩ ⟨f, hf⟩ ⟨g, hg⟩ hfg; exact Subtype.eq hfg
/-- The subgroup of the vertex group at `c` given by the subgroupoid -/
def vertexSubgroup {c : C} (hc : c ∈ S.objs) : Subgroup (c ⟶ c) where
carrier := S.arrows c c
mul_mem' hf hg := S.mul hf hg
one_mem' := id_mem_of_nonempty_isotropy _ _ hc
inv_mem' hf := S.inv hf
/-- The set of all arrows of a subgroupoid, as a set in `Σ c d : C, c ⟶ d`. -/
@[coe] def toSet (S : Subgroupoid C) : Set (Σ c d : C, c ⟶ d) :=
{F | F.2.2 ∈ S.arrows F.1 F.2.1}
instance : SetLike (Subgroupoid C) (Σ c d : C, c ⟶ d) where
coe := toSet
coe_injective' := fun ⟨S, _, _⟩ ⟨T, _, _⟩ h => by ext c d f; apply Set.ext_iff.1 h ⟨c, d, f⟩
theorem mem_iff (S : Subgroupoid C) (F : Σ c d, c ⟶ d) : F ∈ S ↔ F.2.2 ∈ S.arrows F.1 F.2.1 :=
Iff.rfl
theorem le_iff (S T : Subgroupoid C) : S ≤ T ↔ ∀ {c d}, S.arrows c d ⊆ T.arrows c d := by
rw [SetLike.le_def, Sigma.forall]; exact forall_congr' fun c => Sigma.forall
instance : Top (Subgroupoid C) :=
⟨{ arrows := fun _ _ => Set.univ
mul := by intros; trivial
inv := by intros; trivial }⟩
theorem mem_top {c d : C} (f : c ⟶ d) : f ∈ (⊤ : Subgroupoid C).arrows c d :=
trivial
theorem mem_top_objs (c : C) : c ∈ (⊤ : Subgroupoid C).objs := by
dsimp [Top.top, objs]
simp only [univ_nonempty]
instance : Bot (Subgroupoid C) :=
⟨{ arrows := fun _ _ => ∅
mul := False.elim
inv := False.elim }⟩
| instance : Inhabited (Subgroupoid C) :=
⟨⊤⟩
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Groupoid/Subgroupoid.lean | 194 | 195 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Multiset.Basic
/-!
# Bind operation for multisets
This file defines a few basic operations on `Multiset`, notably the monadic bind.
## Main declarations
* `Multiset.join`: The join, aka union or sum, of multisets.
* `Multiset.bind`: The bind of a multiset-indexed family of multisets.
* `Multiset.product`: Cartesian product of two multisets.
* `Multiset.sigma`: Disjoint sum of multisets in a sigma type.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero MulAction
universe v
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type v} {γ δ : Type*}
namespace Multiset
/-! ### Join -/
/-- `join S`, where `S` is a multiset of multisets, is the lift of the list join
operation, that is, the union of all the sets.
join {{1, 2}, {1, 2}, {0, 1}} = {0, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2} -/
def join : Multiset (Multiset α) → Multiset α :=
sum
theorem coe_join : ∀ L : List (List α), join (L.map ((↑) : List α → Multiset α) :
Multiset (Multiset α)) = L.flatten
| [] => rfl
| l :: L => by
exact congr_arg (fun s : Multiset α => ↑l + s) (coe_join L)
@[simp]
theorem join_zero : @join α 0 = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem join_cons (s S) : @join α (s ::ₘ S) = s + join S :=
sum_cons _ _
@[simp]
theorem join_add (S T) : @join α (S + T) = join S + join T :=
sum_add _ _
@[simp]
theorem singleton_join (a) : join ({a} : Multiset (Multiset α)) = a :=
sum_singleton _
@[simp]
theorem mem_join {a S} : a ∈ @join α S ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, a ∈ s :=
Multiset.induction_on S (by simp) <| by
simp +contextual [or_and_right, exists_or]
@[simp]
theorem card_join (S) : card (@join α S) = sum (map card S) :=
Multiset.induction_on S (by simp) (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem map_join (f : α → β) (S : Multiset (Multiset α)) :
map f (join S) = join (map (map f) S) := by
induction S using Multiset.induction with
| empty => simp
| cons _ _ ih => simp [ih]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_join [CommMonoid α] {S : Multiset (Multiset α)} :
prod (join S) = prod (map prod S) := by
induction S using Multiset.induction with
| empty => simp
| cons _ _ ih => simp [ih]
| theorem rel_join {r : α → β → Prop} {s t} (h : Rel (Rel r) s t) : Rel r s.join t.join := by
induction h with
| zero => simp
| cons hab hst ih => simpa using hab.add ih
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Bind.lean | 82 | 86 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Support
import Mathlib.Data.Set.SymmDiff
/-!
# Indicator function
- `Set.indicator (s : Set α) (f : α → β) (a : α)` is `f a` if `a ∈ s` and is `0` otherwise.
- `Set.mulIndicator (s : Set α) (f : α → β) (a : α)` is `f a` if `a ∈ s` and is `1` otherwise.
## Implementation note
In mathematics, an indicator function or a characteristic function is a function
used to indicate membership of an element in a set `s`,
having the value `1` for all elements of `s` and the value `0` otherwise.
But since it is usually used to restrict a function to a certain set `s`,
we let the indicator function take the value `f x` for some function `f`, instead of `1`.
If the usual indicator function is needed, just set `f` to be the constant function `fun _ ↦ 1`.
The indicator function is implemented non-computably, to avoid having to pass around `Decidable`
arguments. This is in contrast with the design of `Pi.single` or `Set.piecewise`.
## Tags
indicator, characteristic
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open Function
variable {α β M N : Type*}
namespace Set
section One
variable [One M] [One N] {s t : Set α} {f g : α → M} {a : α}
/-- `Set.mulIndicator s f a` is `f a` if `a ∈ s`, `1` otherwise. -/
@[to_additive "`Set.indicator s f a` is `f a` if `a ∈ s`, `0` otherwise."]
noncomputable def mulIndicator (s : Set α) (f : α → M) (x : α) : M :=
haveI := Classical.decPred (· ∈ s)
if x ∈ s then f x else 1
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem piecewise_eq_mulIndicator [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] : s.piecewise f 1 = s.mulIndicator f :=
funext fun _ => @if_congr _ _ _ _ (id _) _ _ _ _ Iff.rfl rfl rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_apply (s : Set α) (f : α → M) (a : α) [Decidable (a ∈ s)] :
mulIndicator s f a = if a ∈ s then f a else 1 := by
unfold mulIndicator
congr
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) (f : α → M) : mulIndicator s f a = f a :=
if_pos h
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ s) (f : α → M) : mulIndicator s f a = 1 :=
if_neg h
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_eq_one_or_self (s : Set α) (f : α → M) (a : α) :
mulIndicator s f a = 1 ∨ mulIndicator s f a = f a := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· exact Or.inr (mulIndicator_of_mem h f)
· exact Or.inl (mulIndicator_of_not_mem h f)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_apply_eq_self : s.mulIndicator f a = f a ↔ a ∉ s → f a = 1 :=
letI := Classical.dec (a ∈ s)
ite_eq_left_iff.trans (by rw [@eq_comm _ (f a)])
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_eq_self : s.mulIndicator f = f ↔ mulSupport f ⊆ s := by
simp only [funext_iff, subset_def, mem_mulSupport, mulIndicator_apply_eq_self, not_imp_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_eq_self_of_superset (h1 : s.mulIndicator f = f) (h2 : s ⊆ t) :
t.mulIndicator f = f := by
rw [mulIndicator_eq_self] at h1 ⊢
exact Subset.trans h1 h2
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_apply_eq_one : mulIndicator s f a = 1 ↔ a ∈ s → f a = 1 :=
letI := Classical.dec (a ∈ s)
ite_eq_right_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_eq_one : (mulIndicator s f = fun _ => 1) ↔ Disjoint (mulSupport f) s := by
simp only [funext_iff, mulIndicator_apply_eq_one, Set.disjoint_left, mem_mulSupport,
not_imp_not]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_eq_one' : mulIndicator s f = 1 ↔ Disjoint (mulSupport f) s :=
mulIndicator_eq_one
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_apply_ne_one {a : α} : s.mulIndicator f a ≠ 1 ↔ a ∈ s ∩ mulSupport f := by
simp only [Ne, mulIndicator_apply_eq_one, Classical.not_imp, mem_inter_iff, mem_mulSupport]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulSupport_mulIndicator :
Function.mulSupport (s.mulIndicator f) = s ∩ Function.mulSupport f :=
ext fun x => by simp [Function.mem_mulSupport, mulIndicator_apply_eq_one]
/-- If a multiplicative indicator function is not equal to `1` at a point, then that point is in the
set. -/
@[to_additive
"If an additive indicator function is not equal to `0` at a point, then that point is
in the set."]
theorem mem_of_mulIndicator_ne_one (h : mulIndicator s f a ≠ 1) : a ∈ s :=
not_imp_comm.1 (fun hn => mulIndicator_of_not_mem hn f) h
/-- See `Set.eqOn_mulIndicator'` for the version with `sᶜ`. -/
@[to_additive
"See `Set.eqOn_indicator'` for the version with `sᶜ`"]
theorem eqOn_mulIndicator : EqOn (mulIndicator s f) f s := fun _ hx => mulIndicator_of_mem hx f
/-- See `Set.eqOn_mulIndicator` for the version with `s`. -/
@[to_additive
"See `Set.eqOn_indicator` for the version with `s`."]
theorem eqOn_mulIndicator' : EqOn (mulIndicator s f) 1 sᶜ :=
fun _ hx => mulIndicator_of_not_mem hx f
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_mulIndicator_subset : mulSupport (s.mulIndicator f) ⊆ s := fun _ hx =>
hx.imp_symm fun h => mulIndicator_of_not_mem h f
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_mulSupport : mulIndicator (mulSupport f) f = f :=
mulIndicator_eq_self.2 Subset.rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_range_comp {ι : Sort*} (f : ι → α) (g : α → M) :
mulIndicator (range f) g ∘ f = g ∘ f :=
letI := Classical.decPred (· ∈ range f)
piecewise_range_comp _ _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_congr (h : EqOn f g s) : mulIndicator s f = mulIndicator s g :=
funext fun x => by
simp only [mulIndicator]
split_ifs with h_1
· exact h h_1
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_eq_mulIndicator {t : Set β} {g : β → M} {b : β}
(h1 : a ∈ s ↔ b ∈ t) (h2 : f a = g b) :
s.mulIndicator f a = t.mulIndicator g b := by
by_cases a ∈ s <;> simp_all
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_const_eq_mulIndicator_const {t : Set β} {b : β} {c : M} (h : a ∈ s ↔ b ∈ t) :
s.mulIndicator (fun _ ↦ c) a = t.mulIndicator (fun _ ↦ c) b :=
mulIndicator_eq_mulIndicator h rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_univ (f : α → M) : mulIndicator (univ : Set α) f = f :=
mulIndicator_eq_self.2 <| subset_univ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_empty (f : α → M) : mulIndicator (∅ : Set α) f = fun _ => 1 :=
mulIndicator_eq_one.2 <| disjoint_empty _
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_empty' (f : α → M) : mulIndicator (∅ : Set α) f = 1 :=
mulIndicator_empty f
variable (M)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_one (s : Set α) : (mulIndicator s fun _ => (1 : M)) = fun _ => (1 : M) :=
mulIndicator_eq_one.2 <| by simp only [mulSupport_one, empty_disjoint]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_one' {s : Set α} : s.mulIndicator (1 : α → M) = 1 :=
mulIndicator_one M s
variable {M}
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → M) :
mulIndicator s (mulIndicator t f) = mulIndicator (s ∩ t) f :=
funext fun x => by
simp only [mulIndicator]
split_ifs <;> simp_all +contextual
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_inter_mulSupport (s : Set α) (f : α → M) :
mulIndicator (s ∩ mulSupport f) f = mulIndicator s f := by
rw [← mulIndicator_mulIndicator, mulIndicator_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem comp_mulIndicator (h : M → β) (f : α → M) {s : Set α} {x : α} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] :
h (s.mulIndicator f x) = s.piecewise (h ∘ f) (const α (h 1)) x := by
letI := Classical.decPred (· ∈ s)
convert s.apply_piecewise f (const α 1) (fun _ => h) (x := x) using 2
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_comp_right {s : Set α} (f : β → α) {g : α → M} {x : β} :
mulIndicator (f ⁻¹' s) (g ∘ f) x = mulIndicator s g (f x) := by
simp only [mulIndicator, Function.comp]
split_ifs with h h' h'' <;> first | rfl | contradiction
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_image {s : Set α} {f : β → M} {g : α → β} (hg : Injective g) {x : α} :
mulIndicator (g '' s) f (g x) = mulIndicator s (f ∘ g) x := by
rw [← mulIndicator_comp_right, preimage_image_eq _ hg]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_comp_of_one {g : M → N} (hg : g 1 = 1) :
mulIndicator s (g ∘ f) = g ∘ mulIndicator s f := by
funext
simp only [mulIndicator]
split_ifs <;> simp [*]
@[to_additive]
theorem comp_mulIndicator_const (c : M) (f : M → N) (hf : f 1 = 1) :
(fun x => f (s.mulIndicator (fun _ => c) x)) = s.mulIndicator fun _ => f c :=
(mulIndicator_comp_of_one hf).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_preimage (s : Set α) (f : α → M) (B : Set M) :
mulIndicator s f ⁻¹' B = s.ite (f ⁻¹' B) (1 ⁻¹' B) :=
letI := Classical.decPred (· ∈ s)
piecewise_preimage s f 1 B
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_one_preimage (s : Set M) :
t.mulIndicator 1 ⁻¹' s ∈ ({Set.univ, ∅} : Set (Set α)) := by
classical
rw [mulIndicator_one', preimage_one]
split_ifs <;> simp
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_const_preimage_eq_union (U : Set α) (s : Set M) (a : M) [Decidable (a ∈ s)]
[Decidable ((1 : M) ∈ s)] : (U.mulIndicator fun _ => a) ⁻¹' s =
(if a ∈ s then U else ∅) ∪ if (1 : M) ∈ s then Uᶜ else ∅ := by
rw [mulIndicator_preimage, preimage_one, preimage_const]
split_ifs <;> simp [← compl_eq_univ_diff]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_const_preimage (U : Set α) (s : Set M) (a : M) :
(U.mulIndicator fun _ => a) ⁻¹' s ∈ ({Set.univ, U, Uᶜ, ∅} : Set (Set α)) := by
classical
rw [mulIndicator_const_preimage_eq_union]
split_ifs <;> simp
theorem indicator_one_preimage [Zero M] (U : Set α) (s : Set M) :
U.indicator 1 ⁻¹' s ∈ ({Set.univ, U, Uᶜ, ∅} : Set (Set α)) :=
indicator_const_preimage _ _ 1
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_preimage_of_not_mem (s : Set α) (f : α → M) {t : Set M} (ht : (1 : M) ∉ t) :
mulIndicator s f ⁻¹' t = f ⁻¹' t ∩ s := by
simp [mulIndicator_preimage, Pi.one_def, Set.preimage_const_of_not_mem ht]
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_range_mulIndicator {r : M} {s : Set α} {f : α → M} :
r ∈ range (mulIndicator s f) ↔ r = 1 ∧ s ≠ univ ∨ r ∈ f '' s := by
simp [mulIndicator, ite_eq_iff, exists_or, eq_univ_iff_forall, and_comm, or_comm,
@eq_comm _ r 1]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_rel_mulIndicator {r : M → M → Prop} (h1 : r 1 1) (ha : a ∈ s → r (f a) (g a)) :
r (mulIndicator s f a) (mulIndicator s g a) := by
simp only [mulIndicator]
split_ifs with has
exacts [ha has, h1]
end One
section Monoid
variable [MulOneClass M] {s t : Set α} {a : α}
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_union_mul_inter_apply (f : α → M) (s t : Set α) (a : α) :
mulIndicator (s ∪ t) f a * mulIndicator (s ∩ t) f a
= mulIndicator s f a * mulIndicator t f a := by
by_cases hs : a ∈ s <;> by_cases ht : a ∈ t <;> simp [*]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_union_mul_inter (f : α → M) (s t : Set α) :
mulIndicator (s ∪ t) f * mulIndicator (s ∩ t) f = mulIndicator s f * mulIndicator t f :=
funext <| mulIndicator_union_mul_inter_apply f s t
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_union_of_not_mem_inter (h : a ∉ s ∩ t) (f : α → M) :
mulIndicator (s ∪ t) f a = mulIndicator s f a * mulIndicator t f a := by
rw [← mulIndicator_union_mul_inter_apply f s t, mulIndicator_of_not_mem h, mul_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_union_of_disjoint (h : Disjoint s t) (f : α → M) :
mulIndicator (s ∪ t) f = fun a => mulIndicator s f a * mulIndicator t f a :=
funext fun _ => mulIndicator_union_of_not_mem_inter (fun ha => h.le_bot ha) _
open scoped symmDiff in
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_symmDiff (s t : Set α) (f : α → M) :
mulIndicator (s ∆ t) f = mulIndicator (s \ t) f * mulIndicator (t \ s) f :=
mulIndicator_union_of_disjoint (disjoint_sdiff_self_right.mono_left sdiff_le) _
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_mul (s : Set α) (f g : α → M) :
(mulIndicator s fun a => f a * g a) = fun a => mulIndicator s f a * mulIndicator s g a := by
funext
simp only [mulIndicator]
split_ifs
· rfl
rw [mul_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_mul' (s : Set α) (f g : α → M) :
mulIndicator s (f * g) = mulIndicator s f * mulIndicator s g :=
mulIndicator_mul s f g
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_compl_mul_self_apply (s : Set α) (f : α → M) (a : α) :
mulIndicator sᶜ f a * mulIndicator s f a = f a :=
by_cases (fun ha : a ∈ s => by simp [ha]) fun ha => by simp [ha]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
| theorem mulIndicator_compl_mul_self (s : Set α) (f : α → M) :
mulIndicator sᶜ f * mulIndicator s f = f :=
funext <| mulIndicator_compl_mul_self_apply s f
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Indicator.lean | 333 | 337 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Nat.Even
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Commute
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Operations
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
/-!
# Even and odd elements in rings
This file defines odd elements and proves some general facts about even and odd elements of rings.
As opposed to `Even`, `Odd` does not have a multiplicative counterpart.
## TODO
Try to generalize `Even` lemmas further. For example, there are still a few lemmas whose `Semiring`
assumptions I (DT) am not convinced are necessary. If that turns out to be true, they could be moved
to `Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Even`.
## See also
`Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Even` for the definition of even elements.
-/
assert_not_exists DenselyOrdered OrderedRing
open MulOpposite
variable {F α β : Type*}
section Monoid
variable [Monoid α] [HasDistribNeg α] {n : ℕ} {a : α}
@[simp] lemma Even.neg_pow : Even n → ∀ a : α, (-a) ^ n = a ^ n := by
rintro ⟨c, rfl⟩ a
simp_rw [← two_mul, pow_mul, neg_sq]
lemma Even.neg_one_pow (h : Even n) : (-1 : α) ^ n = 1 := by rw [h.neg_pow, one_pow]
end Monoid
section DivisionMonoid
variable [DivisionMonoid α] [HasDistribNeg α] {a : α} {n : ℤ}
lemma Even.neg_zpow : Even n → ∀ a : α, (-a) ^ n = a ^ n := by
rintro ⟨c, rfl⟩ a; simp_rw [← Int.two_mul, zpow_mul, zpow_two, neg_mul_neg]
lemma Even.neg_one_zpow (h : Even n) : (-1 : α) ^ n = 1 := by rw [h.neg_zpow, one_zpow]
end DivisionMonoid
@[simp] lemma IsSquare.zero [MulZeroClass α] : IsSquare (0 : α) := ⟨0, (mul_zero _).symm⟩
section Semiring
variable [Semiring α] [Semiring β] {a b : α} {m n : ℕ}
lemma even_iff_exists_two_mul : Even a ↔ ∃ b, a = 2 * b := by simp [even_iff_exists_two_nsmul]
lemma even_iff_two_dvd : Even a ↔ 2 ∣ a := by simp [Even, Dvd.dvd, two_mul]
alias ⟨Even.two_dvd, _⟩ := even_iff_two_dvd
lemma Even.trans_dvd (ha : Even a) (hab : a ∣ b) : Even b :=
even_iff_two_dvd.2 <| ha.two_dvd.trans hab
lemma Dvd.dvd.even (hab : a ∣ b) (ha : Even a) : Even b := ha.trans_dvd hab
@[simp] lemma range_two_mul (α) [NonAssocSemiring α] :
Set.range (fun x : α ↦ 2 * x) = {a | Even a} := by
ext x
simp [eq_comm, two_mul, Even]
@[simp] lemma even_two : Even (2 : α) := ⟨1, by rw [one_add_one_eq_two]⟩
@[simp] lemma Even.mul_left (ha : Even a) (b) : Even (b * a) := ha.map (AddMonoidHom.mulLeft _)
@[simp] lemma Even.mul_right (ha : Even a) (b) : Even (a * b) := ha.map (AddMonoidHom.mulRight _)
lemma even_two_mul (a : α) : Even (2 * a) := ⟨a, two_mul _⟩
lemma Even.pow_of_ne_zero (ha : Even a) : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n ≠ 0 → Even (a ^ n)
| n + 1, _ => by rw [pow_succ]; exact ha.mul_left _
/-- An element `a` of a semiring is odd if there exists `k` such `a = 2*k + 1`. -/
def Odd (a : α) : Prop := ∃ k, a = 2 * k + 1
lemma odd_iff_exists_bit1 : Odd a ↔ ∃ b, a = 2 * b + 1 := exists_congr fun b ↦ by rw [two_mul]
alias ⟨Odd.exists_bit1, _⟩ := odd_iff_exists_bit1
@[simp] lemma range_two_mul_add_one (α : Type*) [Semiring α] :
Set.range (fun x : α ↦ 2 * x + 1) = {a | Odd a} := by ext x; simp [Odd, eq_comm]
lemma Even.add_odd : Even a → Odd b → Odd (a + b) := by
rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩ ⟨b, rfl⟩; exact ⟨a + b, by rw [mul_add, ← two_mul, add_assoc]⟩
lemma Even.odd_add (ha : Even a) (hb : Odd b) : Odd (b + a) := add_comm a b ▸ ha.add_odd hb
lemma Odd.add_even (ha : Odd a) (hb : Even b) : Odd (a + b) := add_comm a b ▸ hb.add_odd ha
lemma Odd.add_odd : Odd a → Odd b → Even (a + b) := by
rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩ ⟨b, rfl⟩
refine ⟨a + b + 1, ?_⟩
rw [two_mul, two_mul]
ac_rfl
@[simp] lemma odd_one : Odd (1 : α) :=
⟨0, (zero_add _).symm.trans (congr_arg (· + (1 : α)) (mul_zero _).symm)⟩
@[simp] lemma Even.add_one (h : Even a) : Odd (a + 1) := h.add_odd odd_one
@[simp] lemma Even.one_add (h : Even a) : Odd (1 + a) := h.odd_add odd_one
@[simp] lemma Odd.add_one (h : Odd a) : Even (a + 1) := h.add_odd odd_one
@[simp] lemma Odd.one_add (h : Odd a) : Even (1 + a) := odd_one.add_odd h
lemma odd_two_mul_add_one (a : α) : Odd (2 * a + 1) := ⟨_, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma odd_add_self_one' : Odd (a + (a + 1)) := by simp [← add_assoc]
@[simp] lemma odd_add_one_self : Odd (a + 1 + a) := by simp [add_comm _ a]
@[simp] lemma odd_add_one_self' : Odd (a + (1 + a)) := by simp [add_comm 1 a]
lemma Odd.map [FunLike F α β] [RingHomClass F α β] (f : F) : Odd a → Odd (f a) := by
rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩; exact ⟨f a, by simp [two_mul]⟩
lemma Odd.natCast {R : Type*} [Semiring R] {n : ℕ} (hn : Odd n) : Odd (n : R) :=
hn.map <| Nat.castRingHom R
@[simp] lemma Odd.mul : Odd a → Odd b → Odd (a * b) := by
rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩ ⟨b, rfl⟩
refine ⟨2 * a * b + b + a, ?_⟩
rw [mul_add, add_mul, mul_one, ← add_assoc, one_mul, mul_assoc, ← mul_add, ← mul_add, ← mul_assoc,
← Nat.cast_two, ← Nat.cast_comm]
lemma Odd.pow (ha : Odd a) : ∀ {n : ℕ}, Odd (a ^ n)
| 0 => by
rw [pow_zero]
exact odd_one
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ]; exact ha.pow.mul ha
lemma Odd.pow_add_pow_eq_zero [IsCancelAdd α] (hn : Odd n) (hab : a + b = 0) :
a ^ n + b ^ n = 0 := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := hn
induction k with | zero => simpa | succ k ih => ?_
have : a ^ 2 = b ^ 2 := add_right_cancel <|
calc
a ^ 2 + a * b = 0 := by rw [sq, ← mul_add, hab, mul_zero]
_ = b ^ 2 + a * b := by rw [sq, ← add_mul, add_comm, hab, zero_mul]
refine add_right_cancel (b := b ^ (2 * k + 1) * a ^ 2) ?_
calc
_ = (a ^ (2 * k + 1) + b ^ (2 * k + 1)) * a ^ 2 + b ^ (2 * k + 3) := by
rw [add_mul, ← pow_add, add_right_comm]; rfl
_ = _ := by rw [ih, zero_mul, zero_add, zero_add, this, ← pow_add]
end Semiring
section Monoid
variable [Monoid α] [HasDistribNeg α] {n : ℕ}
lemma Odd.neg_pow : Odd n → ∀ a : α, (-a) ^ n = -a ^ n := by
rintro ⟨c, rfl⟩ a; simp_rw [pow_add, pow_mul, neg_sq, pow_one, mul_neg]
@[simp] lemma Odd.neg_one_pow (h : Odd n) : (-1 : α) ^ n = -1 := by rw [h.neg_pow, one_pow]
end Monoid
section Ring
variable [Ring α] {a b : α} {n : ℕ}
lemma even_neg_two : Even (-2 : α) := by simp only [even_neg, even_two]
lemma Odd.neg (hp : Odd a) : Odd (-a) := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := hp
use -(k + 1)
rw [mul_neg, mul_add, neg_add, add_assoc, two_mul (1 : α), neg_add, neg_add_cancel_right,
← neg_add, hk]
@[simp] lemma odd_neg : Odd (-a) ↔ Odd a := ⟨fun h ↦ neg_neg a ▸ h.neg, Odd.neg⟩
lemma odd_neg_one : Odd (-1 : α) := by simp
lemma Odd.sub_even (ha : Odd a) (hb : Even b) : Odd (a - b) := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]; exact ha.add_even hb.neg
lemma Even.sub_odd (ha : Even a) (hb : Odd b) : Odd (a - b) := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]; exact ha.add_odd hb.neg
lemma Odd.sub_odd (ha : Odd a) (hb : Odd b) : Even (a - b) := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]; exact ha.add_odd hb.neg
end Ring
namespace Nat
variable {m n : ℕ}
lemma odd_iff : Odd n ↔ n % 2 = 1 :=
⟨fun ⟨m, hm⟩ ↦ by omega, fun h ↦ ⟨n / 2, (mod_add_div n 2).symm.trans (by rw [h, add_comm])⟩⟩
instance : DecidablePred (Odd : ℕ → Prop) := fun _ ↦ decidable_of_iff _ odd_iff.symm
lemma not_odd_iff : ¬Odd n ↔ n % 2 = 0 := by rw [odd_iff, mod_two_not_eq_one]
@[simp] lemma not_odd_iff_even : ¬Odd n ↔ Even n := by rw [not_odd_iff, even_iff]
@[simp] lemma not_even_iff_odd : ¬Even n ↔ Odd n := by rw [not_even_iff, odd_iff]
@[simp] lemma not_odd_zero : ¬Odd 0 := not_odd_iff.mpr rfl
lemma _root_.Odd.not_two_dvd_nat (h : Odd n) : ¬(2 ∣ n) := by
rwa [← even_iff_two_dvd, not_even_iff_odd]
lemma even_xor_odd (n : ℕ) : Xor' (Even n) (Odd n) := by
simp [Xor', ← not_even_iff_odd, Decidable.em (Even n)]
lemma even_or_odd (n : ℕ) : Even n ∨ Odd n := (even_xor_odd n).or
lemma even_or_odd' (n : ℕ) : ∃ k, n = 2 * k ∨ n = 2 * k + 1 := by
simpa only [← two_mul, exists_or, Odd, Even] using even_or_odd n
lemma even_xor_odd' (n : ℕ) : ∃ k, Xor' (n = 2 * k) (n = 2 * k + 1) := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ | ⟨k, rfl⟩ := even_or_odd n <;> use k
· simpa only [← two_mul, eq_self_iff_true, xor_true] using (succ_ne_self (2 * k)).symm
· simpa only [xor_true, xor_comm] using (succ_ne_self _)
lemma odd_add_one {n : ℕ} : Odd (n + 1) ↔ ¬ Odd n := by
rw [← not_even_iff_odd, Nat.even_add_one, not_even_iff_odd]
lemma mod_two_add_add_odd_mod_two (m : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (hn : Odd n) : m % 2 + (m + n) % 2 = 1 :=
((even_or_odd m).elim fun hm ↦ by rw [even_iff.1 hm, odd_iff.1 (hm.add_odd hn)]) fun hm ↦ by
rw [odd_iff.1 hm, even_iff.1 (hm.add_odd hn)]
@[simp] lemma mod_two_add_succ_mod_two (m : ℕ) : m % 2 + (m + 1) % 2 = 1 :=
mod_two_add_add_odd_mod_two m odd_one
@[simp] lemma succ_mod_two_add_mod_two (m : ℕ) : (m + 1) % 2 + m % 2 = 1 := by
rw [add_comm, mod_two_add_succ_mod_two]
lemma even_add' : Even (m + n) ↔ (Odd m ↔ Odd n) := by
rw [even_add, ← not_odd_iff_even, ← not_odd_iff_even, not_iff_not]
@[simp] lemma not_even_bit1 (n : ℕ) : ¬Even (2 * n + 1) := by simp [parity_simps]
lemma not_even_two_mul_add_one (n : ℕ) : ¬ Even (2 * n + 1) :=
not_even_iff_odd.2 <| odd_two_mul_add_one n
lemma even_sub' (h : n ≤ m) : Even (m - n) ↔ (Odd m ↔ Odd n) := by
rw [even_sub h, ← not_odd_iff_even, ← not_odd_iff_even, not_iff_not]
lemma Odd.sub_odd (hm : Odd m) (hn : Odd n) : Even (m - n) :=
(le_total n m).elim (fun h ↦ by simp only [even_sub' h, *]) fun h ↦ by
simp only [Nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 h, Even.zero]
alias _root_.Odd.tsub_odd := Nat.Odd.sub_odd
lemma odd_mul : Odd (m * n) ↔ Odd m ∧ Odd n := by simp [not_or, even_mul, ← not_even_iff_odd]
lemma Odd.of_mul_left (h : Odd (m * n)) : Odd m :=
(odd_mul.mp h).1
lemma Odd.of_mul_right (h : Odd (m * n)) : Odd n :=
(odd_mul.mp h).2
lemma even_div : Even (m / n) ↔ m % (2 * n) / n = 0 := by
rw [even_iff_two_dvd, dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero, ← Nat.mod_mul_right_div_self, mul_comm]
@[parity_simps] lemma odd_add : Odd (m + n) ↔ (Odd m ↔ Even n) := by
rw [← not_even_iff_odd, even_add, not_iff, ← not_even_iff_odd]
lemma odd_add' : Odd (m + n) ↔ (Odd n ↔ Even m) := by rw [add_comm, odd_add]
lemma ne_of_odd_add (h : Odd (m + n)) : m ≠ n := by rintro rfl; simp [← not_even_iff_odd] at h
| @[parity_simps] lemma odd_sub (h : n ≤ m) : Odd (m - n) ↔ (Odd m ↔ Even n) := by
rw [← not_even_iff_odd, even_sub h, not_iff, ← not_even_iff_odd]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/Parity.lean | 274 | 275 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.ZMod
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicIntegers
import Mathlib.RingTheory.LocalRing.ResidueField.Defs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.ZMod
/-!
# Relating `ℤ_[p]` to `ZMod (p ^ n)`, aka `ℤ/p^nℤ`.
In this file we establish connections between the `p`-adic integers `ℤ_[p]`
and the integers modulo powers of `p`, `ℤ/p^nℤ`, implemented as `ZMod (p^n)`.
## Main declarations
We show that `ℤ_[p]` has a ring homomorphism to `ℤ/p^nℤ` for each `n`.
The case for `n = 1` is handled separately, since it is used in the general construction
and we may want to use it without the `^1` getting in the way.
* `PadicInt.toZMod`: ring homomorphism to `ℤ/pℤ`, implemented as `ZMod p`.
* `PadicInt.toZModPow`: ring homomorphism to `ℤ/p^nℤ`, implemented as `ZMod (p^n)`.
* `PadicInt.ker_toZMod` / `PadicInt.ker_toZModPow`: the kernels of these maps are the ideals
generated by `p^n`
* `PadicInt.residueField` shows that the residue field of `ℤ_[p]` is isomorhic to ``ℤ/pℤ`.
We also establish the universal property of `ℤ_[p]` as a projective limit.
Given a family of compatible ring homomorphisms `f_k : R → ℤ/p^nℤ`,
there is a unique limit `R → ℤ_[p]`
* `PadicInt.lift`: the limit function
* `PadicInt.lift_spec` / `PadicInt.lift_unique`: the universal property
## Implementation notes
The constructions of the ring homomorphisms go through an auxiliary constructor
`PadicInt.toZModHom`, which removes some boilerplate code.
-/
noncomputable section
open Nat IsLocalRing Padic
namespace PadicInt
variable {p : ℕ} [hp_prime : Fact p.Prime]
section RingHoms
/-! ### Ring homomorphisms to `ZMod p` and `ZMod (p ^ n)` -/
variable (p) (r : ℚ)
/-- `modPart p r` is an integer that satisfies
`‖(r - modPart p r : ℚ_[p])‖ < 1` when `‖(r : ℚ_[p])‖ ≤ 1`,
see `PadicInt.norm_sub_modPart`.
It is the unique non-negative integer that is `< p` with this property.
(Note that this definition assumes `r : ℚ`.
See `PadicInt.zmodRepr` for a version that takes values in `ℕ`
and works for arbitrary `x : ℤ_[p]`.) -/
def modPart : ℤ :=
r.num * gcdA r.den p % p
variable {p}
theorem modPart_lt_p : modPart p r < p := by
convert Int.emod_lt_abs _ _
· simp
· exact mod_cast hp_prime.1.ne_zero
theorem modPart_nonneg : 0 ≤ modPart p r :=
Int.emod_nonneg _ <| mod_cast hp_prime.1.ne_zero
theorem isUnit_den (r : ℚ) (h : ‖(r : ℚ_[p])‖ ≤ 1) : IsUnit (r.den : ℤ_[p]) := by
rw [isUnit_iff]
apply le_antisymm (r.den : ℤ_[p]).2
rw [← not_lt, coe_natCast]
intro norm_denom_lt
have hr : ‖(r * r.den : ℚ_[p])‖ = ‖(r.num : ℚ_[p])‖ := by
congr
rw_mod_cast [@Rat.mul_den_eq_num r]
rw [padicNormE.mul] at hr
have key : ‖(r.num : ℚ_[p])‖ < 1 := by
calc
_ = _ := hr.symm
_ < 1 * 1 := mul_lt_mul' h norm_denom_lt (norm_nonneg _) zero_lt_one
_ = 1 := mul_one 1
have : ↑p ∣ r.num ∧ (p : ℤ) ∣ r.den := by
simp only [← norm_int_lt_one_iff_dvd, ← padic_norm_e_of_padicInt]
exact ⟨key, norm_denom_lt⟩
apply hp_prime.1.not_dvd_one
rwa [← r.reduced.gcd_eq_one, Nat.dvd_gcd_iff, ← Int.natCast_dvd, ← Int.natCast_dvd_natCast]
theorem norm_sub_modPart_aux (r : ℚ) (h : ‖(r : ℚ_[p])‖ ≤ 1) :
↑p ∣ r.num - r.num * r.den.gcdA p % p * ↑r.den := by
rw [← ZMod.intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd]
simp only [Int.cast_natCast, ZMod.natCast_mod, Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_sub]
have := congr_arg (fun x => x % p : ℤ → ZMod p) (gcd_eq_gcd_ab r.den p)
simp only [Int.cast_natCast, CharP.cast_eq_zero, EuclideanDomain.mod_zero, Int.cast_add,
Int.cast_mul, zero_mul, add_zero] at this
push_cast
rw [mul_right_comm, mul_assoc, ← this]
suffices rdcp : r.den.Coprime p by
rw [rdcp.gcd_eq_one]
simp only [mul_one, cast_one, sub_self]
apply Coprime.symm
apply (coprime_or_dvd_of_prime hp_prime.1 _).resolve_right
rw [← Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, ← norm_int_lt_one_iff_dvd, not_lt]
apply ge_of_eq
rw [← isUnit_iff]
exact isUnit_den r h
theorem norm_sub_modPart (h : ‖(r : ℚ_[p])‖ ≤ 1) : ‖(⟨r, h⟩ - modPart p r : ℤ_[p])‖ < 1 := by
let n := modPart p r
rw [norm_lt_one_iff_dvd, ← (isUnit_den r h).dvd_mul_right]
suffices ↑p ∣ r.num - n * r.den by
convert (Int.castRingHom ℤ_[p]).map_dvd this
simp only [n, sub_mul, Int.cast_natCast, eq_intCast, Int.cast_mul, sub_left_inj,
Int.cast_sub]
apply Subtype.coe_injective
simp only [coe_mul, Subtype.coe_mk, coe_natCast]
rw_mod_cast [@Rat.mul_den_eq_num r]
rfl
exact norm_sub_modPart_aux r h
theorem exists_mem_range_of_norm_rat_le_one (h : ‖(r : ℚ_[p])‖ ≤ 1) :
∃ n : ℤ, 0 ≤ n ∧ n < p ∧ ‖(⟨r, h⟩ - n : ℤ_[p])‖ < 1 :=
⟨modPart p r, modPart_nonneg _, modPart_lt_p _, norm_sub_modPart _ h⟩
theorem zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span_aux (n : ℕ) (x : ℤ_[p]) (a b : ℤ)
(ha : x - a ∈ (Ideal.span {(p : ℤ_[p]) ^ n}))
(hb : x - b ∈ (Ideal.span {(p : ℤ_[p]) ^ n})) : (a : ZMod (p ^ n)) = b := by
rw [Ideal.mem_span_singleton] at ha hb
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← Int.cast_sub, ZMod.intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd, Int.natCast_pow]
rw [← dvd_neg, neg_sub] at ha
have := dvd_add ha hb
rwa [sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc, neg_add_cancel_left, ← sub_eq_add_neg, ←
Int.cast_sub, pow_p_dvd_int_iff] at this
theorem zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span (n : ℕ) (x : ℤ_[p]) (a b : ℕ)
(ha : x - a ∈ (Ideal.span {(p : ℤ_[p]) ^ n}))
(hb : x - b ∈ (Ideal.span {(p : ℤ_[p]) ^ n})) : (a : ZMod (p ^ n)) = b := by
simpa using zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span_aux n x a b ha hb
theorem zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_max_ideal (x : ℤ_[p]) (m n : ℕ) (hm : x - m ∈ maximalIdeal ℤ_[p])
(hn : x - n ∈ maximalIdeal ℤ_[p]) : (m : ZMod p) = n := by
rw [maximalIdeal_eq_span_p] at hm hn
have := zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span_aux 1 x m n
simp only [pow_one] at this
specialize this hm hn
apply_fun ZMod.castHom (show p ∣ p ^ 1 by rw [pow_one]) (ZMod p) at this
simp only [map_intCast] at this
simpa only [Int.cast_natCast] using this
variable (x : ℤ_[p])
theorem exists_mem_range : ∃ n : ℕ, n < p ∧ x - n ∈ maximalIdeal ℤ_[p] := by
simp only [maximalIdeal_eq_span_p, Ideal.mem_span_singleton, ← norm_lt_one_iff_dvd]
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := rat_dense p (x : ℚ_[p]) zero_lt_one
have H : ‖(r : ℚ_[p])‖ ≤ 1 := by
rw [norm_sub_rev] at hr
calc
_ = ‖(r : ℚ_[p]) - x + x‖ := by ring_nf
_ ≤ _ := padicNormE.nonarchimedean _ _
_ ≤ _ := max_le (le_of_lt hr) x.2
obtain ⟨n, hzn, hnp, hn⟩ := exists_mem_range_of_norm_rat_le_one r H
lift n to ℕ using hzn
use n
constructor
· exact mod_cast hnp
simp only [norm_def, coe_sub, Subtype.coe_mk, coe_natCast] at hn ⊢
rw [show (x - n : ℚ_[p]) = x - r + (r - n) by ring]
apply lt_of_le_of_lt (padicNormE.nonarchimedean _ _)
apply max_lt hr
simpa using hn
theorem existsUnique_mem_range : ∃! n : ℕ, n < p ∧ x - n ∈ maximalIdeal ℤ_[p] := by
obtain ⟨n, hn₁, hn₂⟩ := exists_mem_range x
use n, ⟨hn₁, hn₂⟩, fun m ⟨hm₁, hm₂⟩ ↦ ?_
have := (zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_max_ideal x n m hn₂ hm₂).symm
rwa [ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff, ModEq, mod_eq_of_lt hn₁, mod_eq_of_lt hm₁] at this
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-17")] alias exists_unique_mem_range := existsUnique_mem_range
/-- `zmodRepr x` is the unique natural number smaller than `p`
satisfying `‖(x - zmodRepr x : ℤ_[p])‖ < 1`.
-/
def zmodRepr : ℕ :=
Classical.choose (existsUnique_mem_range x).exists
theorem zmodRepr_spec : zmodRepr x < p ∧ x - zmodRepr x ∈ maximalIdeal ℤ_[p] :=
Classical.choose_spec (existsUnique_mem_range x).exists
theorem zmodRepr_unique (y : ℕ) (hy₁ : y < p) (hy₂ : x - y ∈ maximalIdeal ℤ_[p]) : y = zmodRepr x :=
have h := (Classical.choose_spec (existsUnique_mem_range x)).right
(h y ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩).trans (h (zmodRepr x) (zmodRepr_spec x)).symm
theorem zmodRepr_lt_p : zmodRepr x < p :=
(zmodRepr_spec _).1
theorem sub_zmodRepr_mem : x - zmodRepr x ∈ maximalIdeal ℤ_[p] :=
(zmodRepr_spec _).2
/-- `toZModHom` is an auxiliary constructor for creating ring homs from `ℤ_[p]` to `ZMod v`.
-/
def toZModHom (v : ℕ) (f : ℤ_[p] → ℕ) (f_spec : ∀ x, x - f x ∈ (Ideal.span {↑v} : Ideal ℤ_[p]))
(f_congr :
∀ (x : ℤ_[p]) (a b : ℕ),
x - a ∈ (Ideal.span {↑v} : Ideal ℤ_[p]) →
x - b ∈ (Ideal.span {↑v} : Ideal ℤ_[p]) → (a : ZMod v) = b) :
ℤ_[p] →+* ZMod v where
toFun x := f x
map_zero' := by
rw [f_congr (0 : ℤ_[p]) _ 0, cast_zero]
· exact f_spec _
· simp only [sub_zero, cast_zero, Submodule.zero_mem]
map_one' := by
rw [f_congr (1 : ℤ_[p]) _ 1, cast_one]
· exact f_spec _
· simp only [sub_self, cast_one, Submodule.zero_mem]
map_add' := by
intro x y
rw [f_congr (x + y) _ (f x + f y), cast_add]
· exact f_spec _
· convert Ideal.add_mem _ (f_spec x) (f_spec y) using 1
rw [cast_add]
ring
map_mul' := by
intro x y
rw [f_congr (x * y) _ (f x * f y), cast_mul]
· exact f_spec _
· let I : Ideal ℤ_[p] := Ideal.span {↑v}
convert I.add_mem (I.mul_mem_left x (f_spec y)) (I.mul_mem_right ↑(f y) (f_spec x)) using 1
rw [cast_mul]
ring
/-- `toZMod` is a ring hom from `ℤ_[p]` to `ZMod p`,
with the equality `toZMod x = (zmodRepr x : ZMod p)`.
-/
def toZMod : ℤ_[p] →+* ZMod p :=
toZModHom p zmodRepr
(by
rw [← maximalIdeal_eq_span_p]
exact sub_zmodRepr_mem)
(by
rw [← maximalIdeal_eq_span_p]
exact zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_max_ideal)
/-- `z - (toZMod z : ℤ_[p])` is contained in the maximal ideal of `ℤ_[p]`, for every `z : ℤ_[p]`.
The coercion from `ZMod p` to `ℤ_[p]` is `ZMod.cast`,
which coerces `ZMod p` into arbitrary rings.
This is unfortunate, but a consequence of the fact that we allow `ZMod p`
to coerce to rings of arbitrary characteristic, instead of only rings of characteristic `p`.
This coercion is only a ring homomorphism if it coerces into a ring whose characteristic divides
`p`. While this is not the case here we can still make use of the coercion.
-/
theorem toZMod_spec : x - (ZMod.cast (toZMod x) : ℤ_[p]) ∈ maximalIdeal ℤ_[p] := by
convert sub_zmodRepr_mem x using 2
dsimp [toZMod, toZModHom]
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_lt hp_prime.1.pos with ⟨p', rfl⟩
change ↑((_ : ZMod (0 + p' + 1)).val) = (_ : ℤ_[0 + p' + 1])
rw [Nat.cast_inj]
apply mod_eq_of_lt
simpa only [zero_add] using zmodRepr_lt_p x
theorem ker_toZMod : RingHom.ker (toZMod : ℤ_[p] →+* ZMod p) = maximalIdeal ℤ_[p] := by
ext x
rw [RingHom.mem_ker]
constructor
· intro h
simpa only [h, ZMod.cast_zero, sub_zero] using toZMod_spec x
· intro h
rw [← sub_zero x] at h
dsimp [toZMod, toZModHom]
convert zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_max_ideal x _ 0 _ h
· norm_cast
· apply sub_zmodRepr_mem
/-- The equivalence between the residue field of the `p`-adic integers and `ℤ/pℤ` -/
def residueField : IsLocalRing.ResidueField ℤ_[p] ≃+* ZMod p :=
(Ideal.quotEquivOfEq PadicInt.ker_toZMod.symm).trans <|
RingHom.quotientKerEquivOfSurjective (ZMod.ringHom_surjective PadicInt.toZMod)
open scoped Classical in
/-- `appr n x` gives a value `v : ℕ` such that `x` and `↑v : ℤ_p` are congruent mod `p^n`.
See `appr_spec`. -/
noncomputable def appr : ℤ_[p] → ℕ → ℕ
| _x, 0 => 0
| x, n + 1 =>
let y := x - appr x n
if hy : y = 0 then appr x n
else
let u := (unitCoeff hy : ℤ_[p])
appr x n + p ^ n * (toZMod ((u * (p : ℤ_[p]) ^ (y.valuation - n : ℤ).natAbs) : ℤ_[p])).val
theorem appr_lt (x : ℤ_[p]) (n : ℕ) : x.appr n < p ^ n := by
induction n generalizing x with
| zero => simp only [appr, zero_eq, _root_.pow_zero, zero_lt_one]
| succ n ih =>
simp only [appr, map_natCast, ZMod.natCast_self, RingHom.map_pow, Int.natAbs, RingHom.map_mul]
have hp : p ^ n < p ^ (n + 1) := by apply Nat.pow_lt_pow_right hp_prime.1.one_lt n.lt_add_one
split_ifs with h
· apply lt_trans (ih _) hp
· calc
_ < p ^ n + p ^ n * (p - 1) := ?_
_ = p ^ (n + 1) := ?_
· apply add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le (ih _)
apply Nat.mul_le_mul_left
apply le_pred_of_lt
apply ZMod.val_lt
· rw [mul_tsub, mul_one, ← _root_.pow_succ]
apply add_tsub_cancel_of_le (le_of_lt hp)
theorem appr_mono (x : ℤ_[p]) : Monotone x.appr := by
apply monotone_nat_of_le_succ
intro n
dsimp [appr]
split_ifs; · rfl
apply Nat.le_add_right
theorem dvd_appr_sub_appr (x : ℤ_[p]) (m n : ℕ) (h : m ≤ n) : p ^ m ∣ x.appr n - x.appr m := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le h; clear h
induction k with
| zero =>
simp only [zero_eq, add_zero, le_refl, tsub_eq_zero_of_le, ne_eq, Nat.isUnit_iff, dvd_zero]
| succ k ih =>
rw [← add_assoc]
dsimp [appr]
split_ifs with h
· exact ih
rw [add_comm, add_tsub_assoc_of_le (appr_mono _ (Nat.le_add_right m k))]
apply dvd_add _ ih
apply dvd_mul_of_dvd_left
apply pow_dvd_pow _ (Nat.le_add_right m k)
theorem appr_spec (n : ℕ) : ∀ x : ℤ_[p], x - appr x n ∈ Ideal.span {(p : ℤ_[p]) ^ n} := by
simp only [Ideal.mem_span_singleton]
induction n with
| zero => simp only [zero_eq, _root_.pow_zero, isUnit_one, IsUnit.dvd, forall_const]
| succ n ih =>
intro x
dsimp only [appr]
split_ifs with h
· rw [h]
apply dvd_zero
push_cast
rw [sub_add_eq_sub_sub]
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := ih x
simp only [map_natCast, ZMod.natCast_self, RingHom.map_pow, RingHom.map_mul, ZMod.natCast_val]
have hc' : c ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
simp only [mul_zero] at hc
contradiction
conv_rhs =>
congr
simp only [hc]
rw [show (x - (appr x n : ℤ_[p])).valuation = ((p : ℤ_[p]) ^ n * c).valuation by rw [hc]]
rw [valuation_p_pow_mul _ _ hc', Nat.cast_add, add_sub_cancel_left, _root_.pow_succ, ← mul_sub]
apply mul_dvd_mul_left
obtain hc0 | hc0 := eq_or_ne c.valuation 0
· simp only [hc0, mul_one, _root_.pow_zero, Nat.cast_zero, Int.natAbs_zero]
rw [mul_comm, unitCoeff_spec h] at hc
suffices c = unitCoeff h by
rw [← this, ← Ideal.mem_span_singleton, ← maximalIdeal_eq_span_p]
apply toZMod_spec
lift c to ℤ_[p]ˣ using by simp [isUnit_iff, norm_eq_zpow_neg_valuation hc', hc0]
rw [IsDiscreteValuationRing.unit_mul_pow_congr_unit _ _ _ _ _ hc]
exact irreducible_p
· simp only [Int.natAbs_natCast, zero_pow hc0, sub_zero, ZMod.cast_zero, mul_zero]
rw [unitCoeff_spec hc']
exact (dvd_pow_self (p : ℤ_[p]) hc0).mul_left _
/-- A ring hom from `ℤ_[p]` to `ZMod (p^n)`, with underlying function `PadicInt.appr n`. -/
def toZModPow (n : ℕ) : ℤ_[p] →+* ZMod (p ^ n) :=
toZModHom (p ^ n) (fun x => appr x n)
(by
intros
rw [Nat.cast_pow]
exact appr_spec n _)
(by
intro x a b ha hb
apply zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span n x a b
· simpa using ha
· simpa using hb)
theorem ker_toZModPow (n : ℕ) :
RingHom.ker (toZModPow n : ℤ_[p] →+* ZMod (p ^ n)) = Ideal.span {(p : ℤ_[p]) ^ n} := by
ext x
rw [RingHom.mem_ker]
constructor
· intro h
suffices x.appr n = 0 by
convert appr_spec n x
simp only [this, sub_zero, cast_zero]
dsimp [toZModPow, toZModHom] at h
rw [ZMod.natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd] at h
apply eq_zero_of_dvd_of_lt h (appr_lt _ _)
· intro h
rw [← sub_zero x] at h
dsimp [toZModPow, toZModHom]
rw [zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span n x _ 0 _ h, cast_zero]
apply appr_spec
-- This is not a simp lemma; simp can't match the LHS.
theorem zmod_cast_comp_toZModPow (m n : ℕ) (h : m ≤ n) :
(ZMod.castHom (pow_dvd_pow p h) (ZMod (p ^ m))).comp (@toZModPow p _ n) = @toZModPow p _ m := by
apply ZMod.ringHom_eq_of_ker_eq
ext x
rw [RingHom.mem_ker, RingHom.mem_ker]
simp only [Function.comp_apply, ZMod.castHom_apply, RingHom.coe_comp]
simp only [toZModPow, toZModHom, RingHom.coe_mk]
dsimp
rw [ZMod.cast_natCast (pow_dvd_pow p h),
zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span m (x.appr n) (x.appr n) (x.appr m)]
· rw [sub_self]
apply Ideal.zero_mem _
· rw [Ideal.mem_span_singleton]
rcases dvd_appr_sub_appr x m n h with ⟨c, hc⟩
use c
rw [← Nat.cast_sub (appr_mono _ h), hc, Nat.cast_mul, Nat.cast_pow]
@[simp]
theorem cast_toZModPow (m n : ℕ) (h : m ≤ n) (x : ℤ_[p]) :
ZMod.cast (toZModPow n x) = toZModPow m x := by
rw [← zmod_cast_comp_toZModPow _ _ h]
rfl
theorem denseRange_natCast : DenseRange (Nat.cast : ℕ → ℤ_[p]) := by
intro x
rw [Metric.mem_closure_range_iff]
intro ε hε
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_pow_neg_lt p hε
use x.appr n
rw [dist_eq_norm]
apply lt_of_le_of_lt _ hn
rw [norm_le_pow_iff_mem_span_pow]
apply appr_spec
theorem denseRange_intCast : DenseRange (Int.cast : ℤ → ℤ_[p]) := by
intro x
refine DenseRange.induction_on denseRange_natCast x ?_ ?_
· exact isClosed_closure
· intro a
apply subset_closure
exact Set.mem_range_self _
end RingHoms
section lift
/-! ### Universal property as projective limit -/
open CauSeq PadicSeq
variable {R : Type*} [NonAssocSemiring R] {p : Nat} (f : ∀ k : ℕ, R →+* ZMod (p ^ k))
/-- Given a family of ring homs `f : Π n : ℕ, R →+* ZMod (p ^ n)`,
`nthHom f r` is an integer-valued sequence
whose `n`th value is the unique integer `k` such that `0 ≤ k < p ^ n`
and `f n r = (k : ZMod (p ^ n))`.
-/
def nthHom (r : R) : ℕ → ℤ := fun n => (f n r : ZMod (p ^ n)).val
@[simp]
theorem nthHom_zero : nthHom f 0 = 0 := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp [nthHom]
rfl
variable {f}
variable [hp_prime : Fact p.Prime]
section
variable
(f_compat : ∀ (k1 k2) (hk : k1 ≤ k2), (ZMod.castHom (pow_dvd_pow p hk) _).comp (f k2) = f k1)
include f_compat
theorem pow_dvd_nthHom_sub (r : R) (i j : ℕ) (h : i ≤ j) :
(p : ℤ) ^ i ∣ nthHom f r j - nthHom f r i := by
specialize f_compat i j h
rw [← Int.natCast_pow, ← ZMod.intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd, Int.cast_sub]
dsimp [nthHom]
rw [← f_compat, RingHom.comp_apply]
simp only [ZMod.cast_id, ZMod.castHom_apply, sub_self, ZMod.natCast_val, ZMod.intCast_cast]
theorem isCauSeq_nthHom (r : R) : IsCauSeq (padicNorm p) fun n => nthHom f r n := by
intro ε hε
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ : ∃ k : ℕ, (p : ℚ) ^ (-((k : ℕ) : ℤ)) < ε := exists_pow_neg_lt_rat p hε
use k
intro j hj
refine lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ hk
-- Need to do beta reduction first, as `norm_cast` doesn't.
-- Added to adapt to https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2734.
beta_reduce
norm_cast
rw [← padicNorm.dvd_iff_norm_le]
exact mod_cast pow_dvd_nthHom_sub f_compat r k j hj
/-- `nthHomSeq f_compat r` bundles `PadicInt.nthHom f r`
as a Cauchy sequence of rationals with respect to the `p`-adic norm.
The `n`th value of the sequence is `((f n r).val : ℚ)`.
-/
def nthHomSeq (r : R) : PadicSeq p :=
⟨fun n => nthHom f r n, isCauSeq_nthHom f_compat r⟩
-- this lemma ran into issues after changing to `NeZero` and I'm not sure why.
theorem nthHomSeq_one : nthHomSeq f_compat 1 ≈ 1 := by
intro ε hε
change _ < _ at hε
use 1
intro j hj
haveI : Fact (1 < p ^ j) := ⟨Nat.one_lt_pow (by omega) hp_prime.1.one_lt⟩
suffices (ZMod.cast (1 : ZMod (p ^ j)) : ℚ) = 1 by simp [nthHomSeq, nthHom, this, hε]
rw [ZMod.cast_eq_val, ZMod.val_one, Nat.cast_one]
theorem nthHomSeq_add (r s : R) :
nthHomSeq f_compat (r + s) ≈ nthHomSeq f_compat r + nthHomSeq f_compat s := by
intro ε hε
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_pow_neg_lt_rat p hε
use n
intro j hj
dsimp [nthHomSeq]
apply lt_of_le_of_lt _ hn
rw [← Int.cast_add, ← Int.cast_sub, ← padicNorm.dvd_iff_norm_le, ←
ZMod.intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd]
dsimp [nthHom]
| simp only [ZMod.natCast_val, RingHom.map_add, Int.cast_sub, ZMod.intCast_cast, Int.cast_add]
rw [ZMod.cast_add (show p ^ n ∣ p ^ j from pow_dvd_pow _ hj)]
simp only [cast_add, ZMod.natCast_val, Int.cast_add, ZMod.intCast_cast, sub_self]
theorem nthHomSeq_mul (r s : R) :
nthHomSeq f_compat (r * s) ≈ nthHomSeq f_compat r * nthHomSeq f_compat s := by
intro ε hε
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_pow_neg_lt_rat p hε
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Padics/RingHoms.lean | 537 | 544 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Bryan Gin-ge Chen
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Heyting.Basic
/-!
# (Generalized) Boolean algebras
A Boolean algebra is a bounded distributive lattice with a complement operator. Boolean algebras
generalize the (classical) logic of propositions and the lattice of subsets of a set.
Generalized Boolean algebras may be less familiar, but they are essentially Boolean algebras which
do not necessarily have a top element (`⊤`) (and hence not all elements may have complements). One
example in mathlib is `Finset α`, the type of all finite subsets of an arbitrary
(not-necessarily-finite) type `α`.
`GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α` is defined to be a distributive lattice with bottom (`⊥`) admitting
a *relative* complement operator, written using "set difference" notation as `x \ y` (`sdiff x y`).
For convenience, the `BooleanAlgebra` type class is defined to extend `GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra`
so that it is also bundled with a `\` operator.
(A terminological point: `x \ y` is the complement of `y` relative to the interval `[⊥, x]`. We do
not yet have relative complements for arbitrary intervals, as we do not even have lattice
intervals.)
## Main declarations
* `GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra`: a type class for generalized Boolean algebras
* `BooleanAlgebra`: a type class for Boolean algebras.
* `Prop.booleanAlgebra`: the Boolean algebra instance on `Prop`
## Implementation notes
The `sup_inf_sdiff` and `inf_inf_sdiff` axioms for the relative complement operator in
`GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra` are taken from
[Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boolean_algebra_(structure)#Generalizations).
[Stone's paper introducing generalized Boolean algebras][Stone1935] does not define a relative
complement operator `a \ b` for all `a`, `b`. Instead, the postulates there amount to an assumption
that for all `a, b : α` where `a ≤ b`, the equations `x ⊔ a = b` and `x ⊓ a = ⊥` have a solution
`x`. `Disjoint.sdiff_unique` proves that this `x` is in fact `b \ a`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boolean_algebra_(structure)#Generalizations>
* [*Postulates for Boolean Algebras and Generalized Boolean Algebras*, M.H. Stone][Stone1935]
* [*Lattice Theory: Foundation*, George Grätzer][Gratzer2011]
## Tags
generalized Boolean algebras, Boolean algebras, lattices, sdiff, compl
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function OrderDual
universe u v
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type*} {x y z : α}
/-!
### Generalized Boolean algebras
Some of the lemmas in this section are from:
* [*Lattice Theory: Foundation*, George Grätzer][Gratzer2011]
* <https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/relative+complement>
* <https://people.math.gatech.edu/~mccuan/courses/4317/symmetricdifference.pdf>
-/
/-- A generalized Boolean algebra is a distributive lattice with `⊥` and a relative complement
operation `\` (called `sdiff`, after "set difference") satisfying `(a ⊓ b) ⊔ (a \ b) = a` and
`(a ⊓ b) ⊓ (a \ b) = ⊥`, i.e. `a \ b` is the complement of `b` in `a`.
This is a generalization of Boolean algebras which applies to `Finset α` for arbitrary
(not-necessarily-`Fintype`) `α`. -/
class GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra (α : Type u) extends DistribLattice α, SDiff α, Bot α where
/-- For any `a`, `b`, `(a ⊓ b) ⊔ (a / b) = a` -/
sup_inf_sdiff : ∀ a b : α, a ⊓ b ⊔ a \ b = a
/-- For any `a`, `b`, `(a ⊓ b) ⊓ (a / b) = ⊥` -/
inf_inf_sdiff : ∀ a b : α, a ⊓ b ⊓ a \ b = ⊥
-- We might want an `IsCompl_of` predicate (for relative complements) generalizing `IsCompl`,
-- however we'd need another type class for lattices with bot, and all the API for that.
section GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α]
@[simp]
theorem sup_inf_sdiff (x y : α) : x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ y = x :=
GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.sup_inf_sdiff _ _
@[simp]
theorem inf_inf_sdiff (x y : α) : x ⊓ y ⊓ x \ y = ⊥ :=
GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.inf_inf_sdiff _ _
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_inf (x y : α) : x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ y = x := by rw [sup_comm, sup_inf_sdiff]
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_inf (x y : α) : x \ y ⊓ (x ⊓ y) = ⊥ := by rw [inf_comm, inf_inf_sdiff]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toOrderBot : OrderBot α where
__ := GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toBot
bot_le a := by
rw [← inf_inf_sdiff a a, inf_assoc]
exact inf_le_left
theorem disjoint_inf_sdiff : Disjoint (x ⊓ y) (x \ y) :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr (inf_inf_sdiff x y).le
-- TODO: in distributive lattices, relative complements are unique when they exist
theorem sdiff_unique (s : x ⊓ y ⊔ z = x) (i : x ⊓ y ⊓ z = ⊥) : x \ y = z := by
conv_rhs at s => rw [← sup_inf_sdiff x y, sup_comm]
rw [sup_comm] at s
conv_rhs at i => rw [← inf_inf_sdiff x y, inf_comm]
rw [inf_comm] at i
exact (eq_of_inf_eq_sup_eq i s).symm
-- Use `sdiff_le`
private theorem sdiff_le' : x \ y ≤ x :=
calc
x \ y ≤ x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ y := le_sup_right
_ = x := sup_inf_sdiff x y
-- Use `sdiff_sup_self`
private theorem sdiff_sup_self' : y \ x ⊔ x = y ⊔ x :=
calc
y \ x ⊔ x = y \ x ⊔ (x ⊔ x ⊓ y) := by rw [sup_inf_self]
_ = y ⊓ x ⊔ y \ x ⊔ x := by ac_rfl
_ = y ⊔ x := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inf_sdiff : x \ y ⊓ y \ x = ⊥ :=
Eq.symm <|
calc
⊥ = x ⊓ y ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_inf_sdiff]
_ = x ⊓ (y ⊓ x ⊔ y \ x) ⊓ x \ y := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = (x ⊓ (y ⊓ x) ⊔ x ⊓ y \ x) ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_sup_left]
_ = (y ⊓ (x ⊓ x) ⊔ x ⊓ y \ x) ⊓ x \ y := by ac_rfl
_ = (y ⊓ x ⊔ x ⊓ y \ x) ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_idem]
_ = x ⊓ y ⊓ x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ y \ x ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_sup_right, inf_comm x y]
_ = x ⊓ y \ x ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_inf_sdiff, bot_sup_eq]
_ = x ⊓ x \ y ⊓ y \ x := by ac_rfl
_ = x \ y ⊓ y \ x := by rw [inf_of_le_right sdiff_le']
theorem disjoint_sdiff_sdiff : Disjoint (x \ y) (y \ x) :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr sdiff_inf_sdiff.le
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_self_right : x ⊓ y \ x = ⊥ :=
calc
x ⊓ y \ x = (x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ y) ⊓ y \ x := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = x ⊓ y ⊓ y \ x ⊔ x \ y ⊓ y \ x := by rw [inf_sup_right]
_ = ⊥ := by rw [inf_comm x y, inf_inf_sdiff, sdiff_inf_sdiff, bot_sup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_self_left : y \ x ⊓ x = ⊥ := by rw [inf_comm, inf_sdiff_self_right]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra :
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α where
__ := ‹GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α›
__ := GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toOrderBot
sdiff := (· \ ·)
sdiff_le_iff y x z :=
⟨fun h =>
le_of_inf_le_sup_le
(le_of_eq
(calc
y ⊓ y \ x = y \ x := inf_of_le_right sdiff_le'
_ = x ⊓ y \ x ⊔ z ⊓ y \ x := by
rw [inf_eq_right.2 h, inf_sdiff_self_right, bot_sup_eq]
_ = (x ⊔ z) ⊓ y \ x := by rw [← inf_sup_right]))
(calc
y ⊔ y \ x = y := sup_of_le_left sdiff_le'
_ ≤ y ⊔ (x ⊔ z) := le_sup_left
_ = y \ x ⊔ x ⊔ z := by rw [← sup_assoc, ← @sdiff_sup_self' _ x y]
_ = x ⊔ z ⊔ y \ x := by ac_rfl),
fun h =>
le_of_inf_le_sup_le
(calc
y \ x ⊓ x = ⊥ := inf_sdiff_self_left
_ ≤ z ⊓ x := bot_le)
(calc
y \ x ⊔ x = y ⊔ x := sdiff_sup_self'
_ ≤ x ⊔ z ⊔ x := sup_le_sup_right h x
_ ≤ z ⊔ x := by rw [sup_assoc, sup_comm, sup_assoc, sup_idem])⟩
theorem disjoint_sdiff_self_left : Disjoint (y \ x) x :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr inf_sdiff_self_left.le
theorem disjoint_sdiff_self_right : Disjoint x (y \ x) :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr inf_sdiff_self_right.le
lemma le_sdiff : x ≤ y \ z ↔ x ≤ y ∧ Disjoint x z :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.trans sdiff_le, disjoint_sdiff_self_left.mono_left h⟩, fun h ↦
by rw [← h.2.sdiff_eq_left]; exact sdiff_le_sdiff_right h.1⟩
@[simp] lemma sdiff_eq_left : x \ y = x ↔ Disjoint x y :=
⟨fun h ↦ disjoint_sdiff_self_left.mono_left h.ge, Disjoint.sdiff_eq_left⟩
/- TODO: we could make an alternative constructor for `GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra` using
`Disjoint x (y \ x)` and `x ⊔ (y \ x) = y` as axioms. -/
theorem Disjoint.sdiff_eq_of_sup_eq (hi : Disjoint x z) (hs : x ⊔ z = y) : y \ x = z :=
have h : y ⊓ x = x := inf_eq_right.2 <| le_sup_left.trans hs.le
sdiff_unique (by rw [h, hs]) (by rw [h, hi.eq_bot])
protected theorem Disjoint.sdiff_unique (hd : Disjoint x z) (hz : z ≤ y) (hs : y ≤ x ⊔ z) :
y \ x = z :=
sdiff_unique
(by
rw [← inf_eq_right] at hs
rwa [sup_inf_right, inf_sup_right, sup_comm x, inf_sup_self, inf_comm, sup_comm z,
hs, sup_eq_left])
(by rw [inf_assoc, hd.eq_bot, inf_bot_eq])
-- cf. `IsCompl.disjoint_left_iff` and `IsCompl.disjoint_right_iff`
theorem disjoint_sdiff_iff_le (hz : z ≤ y) (hx : x ≤ y) : Disjoint z (y \ x) ↔ z ≤ x :=
⟨fun H =>
le_of_inf_le_sup_le (le_trans H.le_bot bot_le)
(by
rw [sup_sdiff_cancel_right hx]
refine le_trans (sup_le_sup_left sdiff_le z) ?_
rw [sup_eq_right.2 hz]),
fun H => disjoint_sdiff_self_right.mono_left H⟩
-- cf. `IsCompl.le_left_iff` and `IsCompl.le_right_iff`
theorem le_iff_disjoint_sdiff (hz : z ≤ y) (hx : x ≤ y) : z ≤ x ↔ Disjoint z (y \ x) :=
(disjoint_sdiff_iff_le hz hx).symm
-- cf. `IsCompl.inf_left_eq_bot_iff` and `IsCompl.inf_right_eq_bot_iff`
theorem inf_sdiff_eq_bot_iff (hz : z ≤ y) (hx : x ≤ y) : z ⊓ y \ x = ⊥ ↔ z ≤ x := by
rw [← disjoint_iff]
exact disjoint_sdiff_iff_le hz hx
-- cf. `IsCompl.left_le_iff` and `IsCompl.right_le_iff`
theorem le_iff_eq_sup_sdiff (hz : z ≤ y) (hx : x ≤ y) : x ≤ z ↔ y = z ⊔ y \ x :=
⟨fun H => by
apply le_antisymm
· conv_lhs => rw [← sup_inf_sdiff y x]
apply sup_le_sup_right
rwa [inf_eq_right.2 hx]
· apply le_trans
· apply sup_le_sup_right hz
· rw [sup_sdiff_left],
fun H => by
conv_lhs at H => rw [← sup_sdiff_cancel_right hx]
refine le_of_inf_le_sup_le ?_ H.le
rw [inf_sdiff_self_right]
exact bot_le⟩
-- cf. `IsCompl.sup_inf`
theorem sdiff_sup : y \ (x ⊔ z) = y \ x ⊓ y \ z :=
sdiff_unique
(calc
y ⊓ (x ⊔ z) ⊔ y \ x ⊓ y \ z = (y ⊓ (x ⊔ z) ⊔ y \ x) ⊓ (y ⊓ (x ⊔ z) ⊔ y \ z) := by
rw [sup_inf_left]
_ = (y ⊓ x ⊔ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ x) ⊓ (y ⊓ x ⊔ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z) := by rw [@inf_sup_left _ _ y]
_ = (y ⊓ z ⊔ (y ⊓ x ⊔ y \ x)) ⊓ (y ⊓ x ⊔ (y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z)) := by ac_rfl
_ = (y ⊓ z ⊔ y) ⊓ (y ⊓ x ⊔ y) := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff, sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = (y ⊔ y ⊓ z) ⊓ (y ⊔ y ⊓ x) := by ac_rfl
_ = y := by rw [sup_inf_self, sup_inf_self, inf_idem])
(calc
y ⊓ (x ⊔ z) ⊓ (y \ x ⊓ y \ z) = (y ⊓ x ⊔ y ⊓ z) ⊓ (y \ x ⊓ y \ z) := by rw [inf_sup_left]
_ = y ⊓ x ⊓ (y \ x ⊓ y \ z) ⊔ y ⊓ z ⊓ (y \ x ⊓ y \ z) := by rw [inf_sup_right]
_ = y ⊓ x ⊓ y \ x ⊓ y \ z ⊔ y \ x ⊓ (y \ z ⊓ (y ⊓ z)) := by ac_rfl
_ = ⊥ := by rw [inf_inf_sdiff, bot_inf_eq, bot_sup_eq, inf_comm (y \ z),
inf_inf_sdiff, inf_bot_eq])
theorem sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff_inf_eq_inf : y \ x = y \ z ↔ y ⊓ x = y ⊓ z :=
⟨fun h => eq_of_inf_eq_sup_eq (a := y \ x) (by rw [inf_inf_sdiff, h, inf_inf_sdiff])
(by rw [sup_inf_sdiff, h, sup_inf_sdiff]),
fun h => by rw [← sdiff_inf_self_right, ← sdiff_inf_self_right z y, inf_comm, h, inf_comm]⟩
theorem sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint : x \ y = x ↔ Disjoint y x :=
calc
x \ y = x ↔ x \ y = x \ ⊥ := by rw [sdiff_bot]
_ ↔ x ⊓ y = x ⊓ ⊥ := sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff_inf_eq_inf
_ ↔ Disjoint y x := by rw [inf_bot_eq, inf_comm, disjoint_iff]
theorem sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint' : x \ y = x ↔ Disjoint x y := by
rw [sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint, disjoint_comm]
theorem sdiff_lt (hx : y ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ ⊥) : x \ y < x := by
refine sdiff_le.lt_of_ne fun h => hy ?_
rw [sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint', disjoint_iff] at h
rw [← h, inf_eq_right.mpr hx]
theorem sdiff_lt_left : x \ y < x ↔ ¬ Disjoint y x := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, Ne, sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint, and_iff_right sdiff_le]
@[simp]
theorem le_sdiff_right : x ≤ y \ x ↔ x = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => disjoint_self.1 (disjoint_sdiff_self_right.mono_right h), fun h => h.le.trans bot_le⟩
@[simp] lemma sdiff_eq_right : x \ y = y ↔ x = ⊥ ∧ y = ⊥ := by
rw [disjoint_sdiff_self_left.eq_iff]; aesop
lemma sdiff_ne_right : x \ y ≠ y ↔ x ≠ ⊥ ∨ y ≠ ⊥ := sdiff_eq_right.not.trans not_and_or
theorem sdiff_lt_sdiff_right (h : x < y) (hz : z ≤ x) : x \ z < y \ z :=
(sdiff_le_sdiff_right h.le).lt_of_not_le
fun h' => h.not_le <| le_sdiff_sup.trans <| sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right h' hz
theorem sup_inf_inf_sdiff : x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z = x ⊓ y ⊔ y \ z :=
calc
x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z = x ⊓ (y ⊓ z) ⊔ y \ z := by rw [inf_assoc]
_ = (x ⊔ y \ z) ⊓ y := by rw [sup_inf_right, sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = x ⊓ y ⊔ y \ z := by rw [inf_sup_right, inf_sdiff_left]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_right : x \ (y \ z) = x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ y ⊓ z := by
rw [sup_comm, inf_comm, ← inf_assoc, sup_inf_inf_sdiff]
apply sdiff_unique
· calc
x ⊓ y \ z ⊔ (z ⊓ x ⊔ x \ y) = (x ⊔ (z ⊓ x ⊔ x \ y)) ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ (z ⊓ x ⊔ x \ y)) := by
rw [sup_inf_right]
_ = (x ⊔ x ⊓ z ⊔ x \ y) ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ (x ⊓ z ⊔ x \ y)) := by ac_rfl
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ x ⊓ z ⊔ x \ y) := by rw [sup_inf_self, sup_sdiff_left, ← sup_assoc]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊓ (z ⊔ y) ⊔ x ⊓ (z ⊔ y) ⊔ x \ y) := by
rw [sup_inf_left, sdiff_sup_self', inf_sup_right, sup_comm y]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ (x ⊓ z ⊔ x ⊓ y) ⊔ x \ y) := by
rw [inf_sdiff_sup_right, @inf_sup_left _ _ x z y]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ (x ⊓ z ⊔ (x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ y))) := by ac_rfl
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ (x ⊔ x ⊓ z)) := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff, sup_comm (x ⊓ z)]
_ = x := by rw [sup_inf_self, sup_comm, inf_sup_self]
· calc
x ⊓ y \ z ⊓ (z ⊓ x ⊔ x \ y) = x ⊓ y \ z ⊓ (z ⊓ x) ⊔ x ⊓ y \ z ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_sup_left]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊓ z ⊓ x) ⊔ x ⊓ y \ z ⊓ x \ y := by ac_rfl
_ = x ⊓ y \ z ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_sdiff_self_left, bot_inf_eq, inf_bot_eq, bot_sup_eq]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊓ y) ⊓ x \ y := by conv_lhs => rw [← inf_sdiff_left]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊓ (y ⊓ x \ y)) := by ac_rfl
_ = ⊥ := by rw [inf_sdiff_self_right, inf_bot_eq, inf_bot_eq]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_right' : x \ (y \ z) = x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ z :=
calc
x \ (y \ z) = x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ y ⊓ z := sdiff_sdiff_right
_ = z ⊓ x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ y := by ac_rfl
_ = x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ z := by rw [sup_inf_inf_sdiff, sup_comm, inf_comm]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_eq_sdiff_sup (h : z ≤ x) : x \ (y \ z) = x \ y ⊔ z := by
rw [sdiff_sdiff_right', inf_eq_right.2 h]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_right_self : x \ (x \ y) = x ⊓ y := by
rw [sdiff_sdiff_right, inf_idem, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_eq_self (h : y ≤ x) : x \ (x \ y) = y := by
rw [sdiff_sdiff_right_self, inf_of_le_right h]
theorem sdiff_eq_symm (hy : y ≤ x) (h : x \ y = z) : x \ z = y := by
rw [← h, sdiff_sdiff_eq_self hy]
theorem sdiff_eq_comm (hy : y ≤ x) (hz : z ≤ x) : x \ y = z ↔ x \ z = y :=
⟨sdiff_eq_symm hy, sdiff_eq_symm hz⟩
theorem eq_of_sdiff_eq_sdiff (hxz : x ≤ z) (hyz : y ≤ z) (h : z \ x = z \ y) : x = y := by
rw [← sdiff_sdiff_eq_self hxz, h, sdiff_sdiff_eq_self hyz]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_iff_le (hx : x ≤ z) (hy : y ≤ z) : z \ x ≤ z \ y ↔ y ≤ x := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, sdiff_le_sdiff_left⟩
rw [← sdiff_sdiff_eq_self hx, ← sdiff_sdiff_eq_self hy]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_left h
theorem sdiff_sdiff_left' : (x \ y) \ z = x \ y ⊓ x \ z := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_left, sdiff_sup]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_sup_sdiff : z \ (x \ y ⊔ y \ x) = z ⊓ (z \ x ⊔ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ x) :=
calc
z \ (x \ y ⊔ y \ x) = (z \ x ⊔ z ⊓ x ⊓ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ z ⊓ y ⊓ x) := by
rw [sdiff_sup, sdiff_sdiff_right, sdiff_sdiff_right]
_ = z ⊓ (z \ x ⊔ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ z ⊓ y ⊓ x) := by rw [sup_inf_left, sup_comm, sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = z ⊓ (z \ x ⊔ y) ⊓ (z ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ x)) := by
rw [sup_inf_left, sup_comm (z \ y), sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = z ⊓ z ⊓ (z \ x ⊔ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ x) := by ac_rfl
_ = z ⊓ (z \ x ⊔ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ x) := by rw [inf_idem]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_sup_sdiff' : z \ (x \ y ⊔ y \ x) = z ⊓ x ⊓ y ⊔ z \ x ⊓ z \ y :=
calc
z \ (x \ y ⊔ y \ x) = z \ (x \ y) ⊓ z \ (y \ x) := sdiff_sup
_ = (z \ x ⊔ z ⊓ x ⊓ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ z ⊓ y ⊓ x) := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_right, sdiff_sdiff_right]
_ = (z \ x ⊔ z ⊓ y ⊓ x) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ z ⊓ y ⊓ x) := by ac_rfl
_ = z \ x ⊓ z \ y ⊔ z ⊓ y ⊓ x := by rw [← sup_inf_right]
_ = z ⊓ x ⊓ y ⊔ z \ x ⊓ z \ y := by ac_rfl
lemma sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_cancel_left (hca : z ≤ x) : (x \ y) \ (x \ z) = z \ y :=
sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff.antisymm <|
(disjoint_sdiff_self_right.mono_left sdiff_le).le_sdiff_of_le_left <| sdiff_le_sdiff_right hca
lemma sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_cancel_right (hcb : z ≤ y) : (x \ z) \ (y \ z) = x \ y := by
rw [le_antisymm_iff, sdiff_le_comm]
exact ⟨sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff,
(disjoint_sdiff_self_left.mono_right sdiff_le).le_sdiff_of_le_left <| sdiff_le_sdiff_left hcb⟩
theorem inf_sdiff : (x ⊓ y) \ z = x \ z ⊓ y \ z :=
sdiff_unique
(calc
x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ x \ z ⊓ y \ z = (x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ x \ z) ⊓ (x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z) := by rw [sup_inf_left]
_ = (x ⊓ y ⊓ (z ⊔ x) ⊔ x \ z) ⊓ (x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z) := by
rw [sup_inf_right, sup_sdiff_self_right, inf_sup_right, inf_sdiff_sup_right]
_ = (y ⊓ (x ⊓ (x ⊔ z)) ⊔ x \ z) ⊓ (x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z) := by ac_rfl
_ = (y ⊓ x ⊔ x \ z) ⊓ (x ⊓ y ⊔ y \ z) := by rw [inf_sup_self, sup_inf_inf_sdiff]
_ = x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ z ⊓ y \ z := by rw [inf_comm y, sup_inf_left]
_ = x ⊓ y := sup_eq_left.2 (inf_le_inf sdiff_le sdiff_le))
(calc
x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊓ (x \ z ⊓ y \ z) = x ⊓ y ⊓ (z ⊓ x \ z) ⊓ y \ z := by ac_rfl
_ = ⊥ := by rw [inf_sdiff_self_right, inf_bot_eq, bot_inf_eq])
/-- See also `sdiff_inf_right_comm`. -/
theorem inf_sdiff_assoc (x y z : α) : (x ⊓ y) \ z = x ⊓ y \ z :=
sdiff_unique
(calc
x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ x ⊓ y \ z = x ⊓ (y ⊓ z) ⊔ x ⊓ y \ z := by rw [inf_assoc]
_ = x ⊓ (y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z) := by rw [← inf_sup_left]
_ = x ⊓ y := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff])
(calc
x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊓ (x ⊓ y \ z) = x ⊓ x ⊓ (y ⊓ z ⊓ y \ z) := by ac_rfl
_ = ⊥ := by rw [inf_inf_sdiff, inf_bot_eq])
/-- See also `inf_sdiff_assoc`. -/
theorem sdiff_inf_right_comm (x y z : α) : x \ z ⊓ y = (x ⊓ y) \ z := by
rw [inf_comm x, inf_comm, inf_sdiff_assoc]
lemma inf_sdiff_left_comm (a b c : α) : a ⊓ (b \ c) = b ⊓ (a \ c) := by
simp_rw [← inf_sdiff_assoc, inf_comm]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-08")] alias inf_sdiff_right_comm := sdiff_inf_right_comm
theorem inf_sdiff_distrib_left (a b c : α) : a ⊓ b \ c = (a ⊓ b) \ (a ⊓ c) := by
rw [sdiff_inf, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 inf_le_left, bot_sup_eq, inf_sdiff_assoc]
theorem inf_sdiff_distrib_right (a b c : α) : a \ b ⊓ c = (a ⊓ c) \ (b ⊓ c) := by
simp_rw [inf_comm _ c, inf_sdiff_distrib_left]
theorem disjoint_sdiff_comm : Disjoint (x \ z) y ↔ Disjoint x (y \ z) := by
simp_rw [disjoint_iff, sdiff_inf_right_comm, inf_sdiff_assoc]
theorem sup_eq_sdiff_sup_sdiff_sup_inf : x ⊔ y = x \ y ⊔ y \ x ⊔ x ⊓ y :=
Eq.symm <|
calc
x \ y ⊔ y \ x ⊔ x ⊓ y = (x \ y ⊔ y \ x ⊔ x) ⊓ (x \ y ⊔ y \ x ⊔ y) := by rw [sup_inf_left]
_ = (x \ y ⊔ x ⊔ y \ x) ⊓ (x \ y ⊔ (y \ x ⊔ y)) := by ac_rfl
_ = (x ⊔ y \ x) ⊓ (x \ y ⊔ y) := by rw [sup_sdiff_right, sup_sdiff_right]
_ = x ⊔ y := by rw [sup_sdiff_self_right, sup_sdiff_self_left, inf_idem]
theorem sup_lt_of_lt_sdiff_left (h : y < z \ x) (hxz : x ≤ z) : x ⊔ y < z := by
rw [← sup_sdiff_cancel_right hxz]
refine (sup_le_sup_left h.le _).lt_of_not_le fun h' => h.not_le ?_
rw [← sdiff_idem]
exact (sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_left h').trans sdiff_le
theorem sup_lt_of_lt_sdiff_right (h : x < z \ y) (hyz : y ≤ z) : x ⊔ y < z := by
rw [← sdiff_sup_cancel hyz]
refine (sup_le_sup_right h.le _).lt_of_not_le fun h' => h.not_le ?_
rw [← sdiff_idem]
exact (sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_right h').trans sdiff_le
instance Prod.instGeneralizedBooleanAlgebra [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra β] :
GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra (α × β) where
sup_inf_sdiff _ _ := Prod.ext (sup_inf_sdiff _ _) (sup_inf_sdiff _ _)
inf_inf_sdiff _ _ := Prod.ext (inf_inf_sdiff _ _) (inf_inf_sdiff _ _)
-- Porting note: Once `pi_instance` has been ported, this is just `by pi_instance`.
instance Pi.instGeneralizedBooleanAlgebra {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra (α i)] : GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
sup_inf_sdiff := fun f g => funext fun a => sup_inf_sdiff (f a) (g a)
inf_inf_sdiff := fun f g => funext fun a => inf_inf_sdiff (f a) (g a)
end GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
/-!
### Boolean algebras
-/
/-- A Boolean algebra is a bounded distributive lattice with a complement operator `ᶜ` such that
`x ⊓ xᶜ = ⊥` and `x ⊔ xᶜ = ⊤`. For convenience, it must also provide a set difference operation `\`
and a Heyting implication `⇨` satisfying `x \ y = x ⊓ yᶜ` and `x ⇨ y = y ⊔ xᶜ`.
This is a generalization of (classical) logic of propositions, or the powerset lattice.
Since `BoundedOrder`, `OrderBot`, and `OrderTop` are mixins that require `LE`
to be present at define-time, the `extends` mechanism does not work with them.
Instead, we extend using the underlying `Bot` and `Top` data typeclasses, and replicate the
order axioms of those classes here. A "forgetful" instance back to `BoundedOrder` is provided.
-/
class BooleanAlgebra (α : Type u) extends
DistribLattice α, HasCompl α, SDiff α, HImp α, Top α, Bot α where
/-- The infimum of `x` and `xᶜ` is at most `⊥` -/
inf_compl_le_bot : ∀ x : α, x ⊓ xᶜ ≤ ⊥
/-- The supremum of `x` and `xᶜ` is at least `⊤` -/
top_le_sup_compl : ∀ x : α, ⊤ ≤ x ⊔ xᶜ
/-- `⊤` is the greatest element -/
le_top : ∀ a : α, a ≤ ⊤
/-- `⊥` is the least element -/
bot_le : ∀ a : α, ⊥ ≤ a
/-- `x \ y` is equal to `x ⊓ yᶜ` -/
sdiff := fun x y => x ⊓ yᶜ
/-- `x ⇨ y` is equal to `y ⊔ xᶜ` -/
himp := fun x y => y ⊔ xᶜ
/-- `x \ y` is equal to `x ⊓ yᶜ` -/
sdiff_eq : ∀ x y : α, x \ y = x ⊓ yᶜ := by aesop
/-- `x ⇨ y` is equal to `y ⊔ xᶜ` -/
himp_eq : ∀ x y : α, x ⇨ y = y ⊔ xᶜ := by aesop
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BooleanAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [h : BooleanAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ h with }
-- See note [reducible non instances]
/-- A bounded generalized boolean algebra is a boolean algebra. -/
abbrev GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toBooleanAlgebra [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] [OrderTop α] :
BooleanAlgebra α where
__ := ‹GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α›
__ := GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toOrderBot
__ := ‹OrderTop α›
compl a := ⊤ \ a
inf_compl_le_bot _ := disjoint_sdiff_self_right.le_bot
top_le_sup_compl _ := le_sup_sdiff
sdiff_eq a b := by
change _ = a ⊓ (⊤ \ b)
rw [← inf_sdiff_assoc, inf_top_eq]
section BooleanAlgebra
variable [BooleanAlgebra α]
theorem inf_compl_eq_bot' : x ⊓ xᶜ = ⊥ :=
bot_unique <| BooleanAlgebra.inf_compl_le_bot x
@[simp]
theorem sup_compl_eq_top : x ⊔ xᶜ = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| BooleanAlgebra.top_le_sup_compl x
@[simp]
theorem compl_sup_eq_top : xᶜ ⊔ x = ⊤ := by rw [sup_comm, sup_compl_eq_top]
theorem isCompl_compl : IsCompl x xᶜ :=
IsCompl.of_eq inf_compl_eq_bot' sup_compl_eq_top
theorem sdiff_eq : x \ y = x ⊓ yᶜ :=
BooleanAlgebra.sdiff_eq x y
theorem himp_eq : x ⇨ y = y ⊔ xᶜ :=
BooleanAlgebra.himp_eq x y
instance (priority := 100) BooleanAlgebra.toComplementedLattice : ComplementedLattice α :=
⟨fun x => ⟨xᶜ, isCompl_compl⟩⟩
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BooleanAlgebra.toGeneralizedBooleanAlgebra :
GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α where
__ := ‹BooleanAlgebra α›
sup_inf_sdiff a b := by rw [sdiff_eq, ← inf_sup_left, sup_compl_eq_top, inf_top_eq]
inf_inf_sdiff a b := by
rw [sdiff_eq, ← inf_inf_distrib_left, inf_compl_eq_bot', inf_bot_eq]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BooleanAlgebra.toBiheytingAlgebra : BiheytingAlgebra α where
__ := ‹BooleanAlgebra α›
__ := GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
hnot := compl
le_himp_iff a b c := by rw [himp_eq, isCompl_compl.le_sup_right_iff_inf_left_le]
himp_bot _ := _root_.himp_eq.trans (bot_sup_eq _)
top_sdiff a := by rw [sdiff_eq, top_inf_eq]
@[simp]
theorem hnot_eq_compl : ￢x = xᶜ :=
rfl
/- NOTE: Is this theorem needed at all or can we use `top_sdiff'`. -/
theorem top_sdiff : ⊤ \ x = xᶜ :=
top_sdiff' x
theorem eq_compl_iff_isCompl : x = yᶜ ↔ IsCompl x y :=
⟨fun h => by
rw [h]
exact isCompl_compl.symm, IsCompl.eq_compl⟩
theorem compl_eq_iff_isCompl : xᶜ = y ↔ IsCompl x y :=
⟨fun h => by
rw [← h]
exact isCompl_compl, IsCompl.compl_eq⟩
theorem compl_eq_comm : xᶜ = y ↔ yᶜ = x := by
rw [eq_comm, compl_eq_iff_isCompl, eq_compl_iff_isCompl]
theorem eq_compl_comm : x = yᶜ ↔ y = xᶜ := by
rw [eq_comm, compl_eq_iff_isCompl, eq_compl_iff_isCompl]
@[simp]
theorem compl_compl (x : α) : xᶜᶜ = x :=
(@isCompl_compl _ x _).symm.compl_eq
theorem compl_comp_compl : compl ∘ compl = @id α :=
funext compl_compl
@[simp]
theorem compl_involutive : Function.Involutive (compl : α → α) :=
compl_compl
theorem compl_bijective : Function.Bijective (compl : α → α) :=
compl_involutive.bijective
theorem compl_surjective : Function.Surjective (compl : α → α) :=
compl_involutive.surjective
theorem compl_injective : Function.Injective (compl : α → α) :=
compl_involutive.injective
@[simp]
theorem compl_inj_iff : xᶜ = yᶜ ↔ x = y :=
compl_injective.eq_iff
theorem IsCompl.compl_eq_iff (h : IsCompl x y) : zᶜ = y ↔ z = x :=
h.compl_eq ▸ compl_inj_iff
@[simp]
theorem compl_eq_top : xᶜ = ⊤ ↔ x = ⊥ :=
isCompl_bot_top.compl_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem compl_eq_bot : xᶜ = ⊥ ↔ x = ⊤ :=
isCompl_top_bot.compl_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem compl_inf : (x ⊓ y)ᶜ = xᶜ ⊔ yᶜ :=
hnot_inf_distrib _ _
@[simp]
theorem compl_le_compl_iff_le : yᶜ ≤ xᶜ ↔ x ≤ y :=
⟨fun h => by have h := compl_le_compl h; simpa using h, compl_le_compl⟩
@[simp] lemma compl_lt_compl_iff_lt : yᶜ < xᶜ ↔ x < y :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le' compl_le_compl_iff_le compl_le_compl_iff_le
theorem compl_le_of_compl_le (h : yᶜ ≤ x) : xᶜ ≤ y := by
simpa only [compl_compl] using compl_le_compl h
theorem compl_le_iff_compl_le : xᶜ ≤ y ↔ yᶜ ≤ x :=
⟨compl_le_of_compl_le, compl_le_of_compl_le⟩
@[simp] theorem compl_le_self : xᶜ ≤ x ↔ x = ⊤ := by simpa using le_compl_self (a := xᶜ)
@[simp] theorem compl_lt_self [Nontrivial α] : xᶜ < x ↔ x = ⊤ := by
simpa using lt_compl_self (a := xᶜ)
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_compl : x \ yᶜ = x ⊓ y := by rw [sdiff_eq, compl_compl]
instance OrderDual.instBooleanAlgebra : BooleanAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
__ := instDistribLattice α
__ := instHeytingAlgebra
sdiff_eq _ _ := @himp_eq α _ _ _
himp_eq _ _ := @sdiff_eq α _ _ _
inf_compl_le_bot a := (@codisjoint_hnot_right _ _ (ofDual a)).top_le
top_le_sup_compl a := (@disjoint_compl_right _ _ (ofDual a)).le_bot
@[simp]
theorem sup_inf_inf_compl : x ⊓ y ⊔ x ⊓ yᶜ = x := by rw [← sdiff_eq, sup_inf_sdiff _ _]
theorem compl_sdiff : (x \ y)ᶜ = x ⇨ y := by
rw [sdiff_eq, himp_eq, compl_inf, compl_compl, sup_comm]
@[simp]
theorem compl_himp : (x ⇨ y)ᶜ = x \ y :=
@compl_sdiff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem compl_sdiff_compl : xᶜ \ yᶜ = y \ x := by rw [sdiff_compl, sdiff_eq, inf_comm]
@[simp]
theorem compl_himp_compl : xᶜ ⇨ yᶜ = y ⇨ x :=
@compl_sdiff_compl αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem disjoint_compl_left_iff : Disjoint xᶜ y ↔ y ≤ x := by
rw [← le_compl_iff_disjoint_left, compl_compl]
theorem disjoint_compl_right_iff : Disjoint x yᶜ ↔ x ≤ y := by
rw [← le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, compl_compl]
theorem codisjoint_himp_self_left : Codisjoint (x ⇨ y) x :=
@disjoint_sdiff_self_left αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem codisjoint_himp_self_right : Codisjoint x (x ⇨ y) :=
@disjoint_sdiff_self_right αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem himp_le : x ⇨ y ≤ z ↔ y ≤ z ∧ Codisjoint x z :=
(@le_sdiff αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _).trans <| and_congr_right' <| @codisjoint_comm _ (_) _ _ _
@[simp] lemma himp_le_left : x ⇨ y ≤ x ↔ x = ⊤ :=
⟨fun h ↦ codisjoint_self.1 <| codisjoint_himp_self_right.mono_right h, fun h ↦ le_top.trans h.ge⟩
@[simp] lemma himp_eq_left : x ⇨ y = x ↔ x = ⊤ ∧ y = ⊤ := by
rw [codisjoint_himp_self_left.eq_iff]; aesop
lemma himp_ne_right : x ⇨ y ≠ x ↔ x ≠ ⊤ ∨ y ≠ ⊤ := himp_eq_left.not.trans not_and_or
lemma codisjoint_iff_compl_le_left : Codisjoint x y ↔ yᶜ ≤ x :=
hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_left.symm
lemma codisjoint_iff_compl_le_right : Codisjoint x y ↔ xᶜ ≤ y :=
hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right.symm
end BooleanAlgebra
instance Prop.instBooleanAlgebra : BooleanAlgebra Prop where
__ := Prop.instHeytingAlgebra
__ := GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice
compl := Not
himp_eq _ _ := propext imp_iff_or_not
inf_compl_le_bot _ H := H.2 H.1
top_le_sup_compl p _ := Classical.em p
instance Prod.instBooleanAlgebra [BooleanAlgebra α] [BooleanAlgebra β] :
BooleanAlgebra (α × β) where
__ := instDistribLattice α β
__ := instHeytingAlgebra
himp_eq x y := by ext <;> simp [himp_eq]
sdiff_eq x y := by ext <;> simp [sdiff_eq]
inf_compl_le_bot x := by constructor <;> simp
top_le_sup_compl x := by constructor <;> simp
instance Pi.instBooleanAlgebra {ι : Type u} {α : ι → Type v} [∀ i, BooleanAlgebra (α i)] :
BooleanAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
__ := instDistribLattice
__ := instHeytingAlgebra
sdiff_eq _ _ := funext fun _ => sdiff_eq
himp_eq _ _ := funext fun _ => himp_eq
inf_compl_le_bot _ _ := BooleanAlgebra.inf_compl_le_bot _
top_le_sup_compl _ _ := BooleanAlgebra.top_le_sup_compl _
instance Bool.instBooleanAlgebra : BooleanAlgebra Bool where
__ := instBoundedOrder
compl := not
inf_compl_le_bot a := a.and_not_self.le
top_le_sup_compl a := a.or_not_self.ge
theorem Bool.sup_eq_bor : (· ⊔ ·) = or := by dsimp
theorem Bool.inf_eq_band : (· ⊓ ·) = and := by dsimp
@[simp]
theorem Bool.compl_eq_bnot : HasCompl.compl = not :=
rfl
section lift
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Pullback a `GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra` along an injection. -/
protected abbrev Function.Injective.generalizedBooleanAlgebra [Max α] [Min α] [Bot α] [SDiff α]
[GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra β] (f : α → β) (hf : Injective f)
(map_sup : ∀ a b, f (a ⊔ b) = f a ⊔ f b) (map_inf : ∀ a b, f (a ⊓ b) = f a ⊓ f b)
(map_bot : f ⊥ = ⊥) (map_sdiff : ∀ a b, f (a \ b) = f a \ f b) :
GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α where
__ := hf.generalizedCoheytingAlgebra f map_sup map_inf map_bot map_sdiff
__ := hf.distribLattice f map_sup map_inf
| sup_inf_sdiff a b := hf <| by rw [map_sup, map_sdiff, map_inf, sup_inf_sdiff]
inf_inf_sdiff a b := hf <| by rw [map_inf, map_sdiff, map_inf, inf_inf_sdiff, map_bot]
| Mathlib/Order/BooleanAlgebra.lean | 762 | 763 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Sqrt
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Sqrt
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Algebraic.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
/-!
# Irrational real numbers
In this file we define a predicate `Irrational` on `ℝ`, prove that the `n`-th root of an integer
number is irrational if it is not integer, and that `√(q : ℚ)` is irrational if and only if
`¬IsSquare q ∧ 0 ≤ q`.
We also provide dot-style constructors like `Irrational.add_rat`, `Irrational.rat_sub` etc.
With the `Decidable` instances in this file, is possible to prove `Irrational √n` using `decide`,
when `n` is a numeric literal or cast;
but this only works if you `unseal Nat.sqrt.iter in` before the theorem where you use this proof.
-/
open Rat Real
/-- A real number is irrational if it is not equal to any rational number. -/
def Irrational (x : ℝ) :=
x ∉ Set.range ((↑) : ℚ → ℝ)
theorem irrational_iff_ne_rational (x : ℝ) : Irrational x ↔ ∀ a b : ℤ, x ≠ a / b := by
simp only [Irrational, Rat.forall, cast_mk, not_exists, Set.mem_range, cast_intCast, cast_div,
eq_comm]
/-- A transcendental real number is irrational. -/
theorem Transcendental.irrational {r : ℝ} (tr : Transcendental ℚ r) : Irrational r := by
rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩
exact tr (isAlgebraic_algebraMap a)
/-!
### Irrationality of roots of integer and rational numbers
-/
/-- If `x^n`, `n > 0`, is integer and is not the `n`-th power of an integer, then
`x` is irrational. -/
theorem irrational_nrt_of_notint_nrt {x : ℝ} (n : ℕ) (m : ℤ) (hxr : x ^ n = m)
(hv : ¬∃ y : ℤ, x = y) (hnpos : 0 < n) : Irrational x := by
rintro ⟨⟨N, D, P, C⟩, rfl⟩
rw [← cast_pow] at hxr
have c1 : ((D : ℤ) : ℝ) ≠ 0 := by
rw [Int.cast_ne_zero, Int.natCast_ne_zero]
exact P
have c2 : ((D : ℤ) : ℝ) ^ n ≠ 0 := pow_ne_zero _ c1
rw [mk'_eq_divInt, cast_pow, cast_mk, div_pow, div_eq_iff_mul_eq c2, ← Int.cast_pow,
← Int.cast_pow, ← Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_inj] at hxr
have hdivn : (D : ℤ) ^ n ∣ N ^ n := Dvd.intro_left m hxr
rw [← Int.dvd_natAbs, ← Int.natCast_pow, Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, Int.natAbs_pow,
Nat.pow_dvd_pow_iff hnpos.ne'] at hdivn
obtain rfl : D = 1 := by rw [← Nat.gcd_eq_right hdivn, C.gcd_eq_one]
refine hv ⟨N, ?_⟩
rw [mk'_eq_divInt, Int.ofNat_one, divInt_one, cast_intCast]
/-- If `x^n = m` is an integer and `n` does not divide the `multiplicity p m`, then `x`
is irrational. -/
theorem irrational_nrt_of_n_not_dvd_multiplicity {x : ℝ} (n : ℕ) {m : ℤ} (hm : m ≠ 0) (p : ℕ)
[hp : Fact p.Prime] (hxr : x ^ n = m)
(hv : multiplicity (p : ℤ) m % n ≠ 0) :
Irrational x := by
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos n with (rfl | hnpos)
· rw [eq_comm, pow_zero, ← Int.cast_one, Int.cast_inj] at hxr
simp [hxr, multiplicity_of_one_right (mt isUnit_iff_dvd_one.1
(mt Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.1 hp.1.not_dvd_one)), Nat.zero_mod] at hv
refine irrational_nrt_of_notint_nrt _ _ hxr ?_ hnpos
rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
rw [← Int.cast_pow, Int.cast_inj] at hxr
subst m
have : y ≠ 0 := by rintro rfl; rw [zero_pow hnpos.ne'] at hm; exact hm rfl
rw [(Int.finiteMultiplicity_iff.2 ⟨by simp [hp.1.ne_one], this⟩).multiplicity_pow
(Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.1), Nat.mul_mod_right] at hv
exact hv rfl
theorem irrational_sqrt_of_multiplicity_odd (m : ℤ) (hm : 0 < m) (p : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime]
(Hpv : multiplicity (p : ℤ) m % 2 = 1) :
Irrational (√m) :=
@irrational_nrt_of_n_not_dvd_multiplicity _ 2 _ (Ne.symm (ne_of_lt hm)) p hp
(sq_sqrt (Int.cast_nonneg.2 <| le_of_lt hm)) (by rw [Hpv]; exact one_ne_zero)
@[simp] theorem not_irrational_zero : ¬Irrational 0 := not_not_intro ⟨0, Rat.cast_zero⟩
@[simp] theorem not_irrational_one : ¬Irrational 1 := not_not_intro ⟨1, Rat.cast_one⟩
theorem irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff_of_nonneg {q : ℚ} (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
Irrational (√q) ↔ ¬IsSquare q := by
refine Iff.not (?_ : Exists _ ↔ Exists _)
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
refine ⟨y, Rat.cast_injective (α := ℝ) ?_⟩
rw [Rat.cast_mul, hy, mul_self_sqrt (Rat.cast_nonneg.2 hq)]
· rintro ⟨q', rfl⟩
exact ⟨|q'|, mod_cast (sqrt_mul_self_eq_abs q').symm⟩
theorem irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff {q : ℚ} :
Irrational (√q) ↔ ¬IsSquare q ∧ 0 ≤ q := by
obtain hq | hq := le_or_lt 0 q
· simp_rw [irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff_of_nonneg hq, and_iff_left hq]
· rw [sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos (Rat.cast_nonpos.2 hq.le)]
simp_rw [not_irrational_zero, false_iff, not_and, not_le, hq, implies_true]
theorem irrational_sqrt_intCast_iff_of_nonneg {z : ℤ} (hz : 0 ≤ z) :
Irrational (√z) ↔ ¬IsSquare z := by
rw [← Rat.isSquare_intCast_iff, ← irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff_of_nonneg (mod_cast hz),
Rat.cast_intCast]
theorem irrational_sqrt_intCast_iff {z : ℤ} :
Irrational (√z) ↔ ¬IsSquare z ∧ 0 ≤ z := by
rw [← Rat.cast_intCast, irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff, Rat.isSquare_intCast_iff, Int.cast_nonneg]
theorem irrational_sqrt_natCast_iff {n : ℕ} : Irrational (√n) ↔ ¬IsSquare n := by
rw [← Rat.isSquare_natCast_iff, ← irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg,
Rat.cast_natCast]
theorem irrational_sqrt_ofNat_iff {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
Irrational √(ofNat(n)) ↔ ¬IsSquare ofNat(n) :=
irrational_sqrt_natCast_iff
theorem Nat.Prime.irrational_sqrt {p : ℕ} (hp : Nat.Prime p) : Irrational (√p) :=
irrational_sqrt_natCast_iff.mpr hp.not_isSquare
/-- **Irrationality of the Square Root of 2** -/
theorem irrational_sqrt_two : Irrational (√2) := by
simpa using Nat.prime_two.irrational_sqrt
/--
This can be used as
```lean
unseal Nat.sqrt.iter in
example : Irrational √24 := by decide
```
-/
instance {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] : Decidable (Irrational √(ofNat(n))) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ irrational_sqrt_ofNat_iff
instance (n : ℕ) : Decidable (Irrational (√n)) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ irrational_sqrt_natCast_iff
instance (z : ℤ) : Decidable (Irrational (√z)) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ irrational_sqrt_intCast_iff
instance (q : ℚ) : Decidable (Irrational (√q)) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff
/-!
### Dot-style operations on `Irrational`
#### Coercion of a rational/integer/natural number is not irrational
-/
namespace Irrational
variable {x : ℝ}
/-!
#### Irrational number is not equal to a rational/integer/natural number
-/
theorem ne_rat (h : Irrational x) (q : ℚ) : x ≠ q := fun hq => h ⟨q, hq.symm⟩
theorem ne_int (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : x ≠ m := by
rw [← Rat.cast_intCast]
exact h.ne_rat _
theorem ne_nat (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : x ≠ m :=
h.ne_int m
theorem ne_zero (h : Irrational x) : x ≠ 0 := mod_cast h.ne_nat 0
theorem ne_one (h : Irrational x) : x ≠ 1 := by simpa only [Nat.cast_one] using h.ne_nat 1
@[simp] theorem ne_ofNat (h : Irrational x) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : x ≠ ofNat(n) :=
h.ne_nat n
end Irrational
@[simp]
theorem Rat.not_irrational (q : ℚ) : ¬Irrational q := fun h => h ⟨q, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem Int.not_irrational (m : ℤ) : ¬Irrational m := fun h => h.ne_int m rfl
@[simp]
theorem Nat.not_irrational (m : ℕ) : ¬Irrational m := fun h => h.ne_nat m rfl
@[simp] theorem not_irrational_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ¬Irrational ofNat(n) :=
n.not_irrational
namespace Irrational
variable (q : ℚ) {x y : ℝ}
/-!
#### Addition of rational/integer/natural numbers
-/
/-- If `x + y` is irrational, then at least one of `x` and `y` is irrational. -/
theorem add_cases : Irrational (x + y) → Irrational x ∨ Irrational y := by
delta Irrational
contrapose!
rintro ⟨⟨rx, rfl⟩, ⟨ry, rfl⟩⟩
exact ⟨rx + ry, cast_add rx ry⟩
theorem of_ratCast_add (h : Irrational (q + x)) : Irrational x :=
h.add_cases.resolve_left q.not_irrational
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_rat_add := of_ratCast_add
theorem ratCast_add (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (q + x) :=
of_ratCast_add (-q) <| by rwa [cast_neg, neg_add_cancel_left]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias rat_add := ratCast_add
theorem of_add_ratCast : Irrational (x + q) → Irrational x :=
add_comm (↑q) x ▸ of_ratCast_add q
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_add_rat := of_add_ratCast
theorem add_ratCast (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (x + q) :=
add_comm (↑q) x ▸ h.ratCast_add q
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias add_rat := add_ratCast
theorem of_intCast_add (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (m + x)) : Irrational x := by
rw [← cast_intCast] at h
exact h.of_ratCast_add m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_int_add := of_intCast_add
theorem of_add_intCast (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (x + m)) : Irrational x :=
of_intCast_add m <| add_comm x m ▸ h
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_add_int := of_add_intCast
theorem intCast_add (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : Irrational (m + x) := by
rw [← cast_intCast]
exact h.ratCast_add m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias int_add := intCast_add
theorem add_intCast (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : Irrational (x + m) :=
add_comm (↑m) x ▸ h.intCast_add m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias add_int := add_intCast
theorem of_natCast_add (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (m + x)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_intCast_add m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_nat_add := of_natCast_add
theorem of_add_natCast (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (x + m)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_add_intCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_add_nat := of_add_natCast
theorem natCast_add (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : Irrational (m + x) :=
h.intCast_add m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias nat_add := natCast_add
theorem add_natCast (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : Irrational (x + m) :=
h.add_intCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias add_nat := add_natCast
/-!
#### Negation
-/
theorem of_neg (h : Irrational (-x)) : Irrational x := fun ⟨q, hx⟩ => h ⟨-q, by rw [cast_neg, hx]⟩
protected theorem neg (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (-x) :=
of_neg <| by rwa [neg_neg]
/-!
#### Subtraction of rational/integer/natural numbers
-/
theorem sub_ratCast (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (x - q) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg, cast_neg] using h.add_ratCast (-q)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias sub_rat := sub_ratCast
theorem ratCast_sub (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (q - x) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h.neg.ratCast_add q
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias rat_sub := ratCast_sub
theorem of_sub_ratCast (h : Irrational (x - q)) : Irrational x :=
of_add_ratCast (-q) <| by simpa only [cast_neg, sub_eq_add_neg] using h
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_sub_rat := of_sub_ratCast
theorem of_ratCast_sub (h : Irrational (q - x)) : Irrational x :=
of_neg (of_ratCast_add q (by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h))
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_rat_sub := of_ratCast_sub
theorem sub_intCast (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : Irrational (x - m) := by
simpa only [Rat.cast_intCast] using h.sub_ratCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias sub_int := sub_intCast
theorem intCast_sub (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : Irrational (m - x) := by
simpa only [Rat.cast_intCast] using h.ratCast_sub m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias int_sub := intCast_sub
theorem of_sub_intCast (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (x - m)) : Irrational x :=
of_sub_ratCast m <| by rwa [Rat.cast_intCast]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_sub_int := of_sub_intCast
theorem of_intCast_sub (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (m - x)) : Irrational x :=
of_ratCast_sub m <| by rwa [Rat.cast_intCast]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_int_sub := of_intCast_sub
theorem sub_natCast (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : Irrational (x - m) :=
h.sub_intCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias sub_nat := sub_natCast
theorem natCast_sub (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : Irrational (m - x) :=
h.intCast_sub m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias nat_sub := natCast_sub
theorem of_sub_natCast (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (x - m)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_sub_intCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_sub_nat := of_sub_natCast
theorem of_natCast_sub (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (m - x)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_intCast_sub m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_nat_sub := of_natCast_sub
/-!
#### Multiplication by rational numbers
-/
theorem mul_cases : Irrational (x * y) → Irrational x ∨ Irrational y := by
delta Irrational
contrapose!
rintro ⟨⟨rx, rfl⟩, ⟨ry, rfl⟩⟩
exact ⟨rx * ry, cast_mul rx ry⟩
theorem of_mul_ratCast (h : Irrational (x * q)) : Irrational x :=
h.mul_cases.resolve_right q.not_irrational
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_mul_rat := of_mul_ratCast
theorem mul_ratCast (h : Irrational x) {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : Irrational (x * q) :=
of_mul_ratCast q⁻¹ <| by rwa [mul_assoc, ← cast_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ hq, cast_one, mul_one]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias mul_rat := mul_ratCast
theorem of_ratCast_mul : Irrational (q * x) → Irrational x :=
mul_comm x q ▸ of_mul_ratCast q
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_rat_mul := of_ratCast_mul
theorem ratCast_mul (h : Irrational x) {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : Irrational (q * x) :=
mul_comm x q ▸ h.mul_ratCast hq
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias rat_mul := ratCast_mul
theorem of_mul_intCast (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (x * m)) : Irrational x :=
of_mul_ratCast m <| by rwa [cast_intCast]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_mul_int := of_mul_intCast
theorem of_intCast_mul (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (m * x)) : Irrational x :=
of_ratCast_mul m <| by rwa [cast_intCast]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_int_mul := of_intCast_mul
theorem mul_intCast (h : Irrational x) {m : ℤ} (hm : m ≠ 0) : Irrational (x * m) := by
rw [← cast_intCast]
refine h.mul_ratCast ?_
rwa [Int.cast_ne_zero]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias mul_int := mul_intCast
theorem intCast_mul (h : Irrational x) {m : ℤ} (hm : m ≠ 0) : Irrational (m * x) :=
mul_comm x m ▸ h.mul_intCast hm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias int_mul := intCast_mul
theorem of_mul_natCast (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (x * m)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_mul_intCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_mul_nat := of_mul_natCast
theorem of_natCast_mul (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (m * x)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_intCast_mul m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_nat_mul := of_natCast_mul
theorem mul_natCast (h : Irrational x) {m : ℕ} (hm : m ≠ 0) : Irrational (x * m) :=
h.mul_intCast <| Int.natCast_ne_zero.2 hm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias mul_nat := mul_natCast
theorem natCast_mul (h : Irrational x) {m : ℕ} (hm : m ≠ 0) : Irrational (m * x) :=
h.intCast_mul <| Int.natCast_ne_zero.2 hm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias nat_mul := natCast_mul
/-!
#### Inverse
-/
theorem of_inv (h : Irrational x⁻¹) : Irrational x := fun ⟨q, hq⟩ => h <| hq ▸ ⟨q⁻¹, q.cast_inv⟩
protected theorem inv (h : Irrational x) : Irrational x⁻¹ :=
of_inv <| by rwa [inv_inv]
/-!
#### Division
-/
theorem div_cases (h : Irrational (x / y)) : Irrational x ∨ Irrational y :=
h.mul_cases.imp id of_inv
theorem of_ratCast_div (h : Irrational (q / x)) : Irrational x :=
(h.of_ratCast_mul q).of_inv
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_rat_div := of_ratCast_div
theorem of_div_ratCast (h : Irrational (x / q)) : Irrational x :=
h.div_cases.resolve_right q.not_irrational
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_div_rat := of_div_ratCast
theorem ratCast_div (h : Irrational x) {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : Irrational (q / x) :=
h.inv.ratCast_mul hq
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias rat_div := ratCast_div
theorem div_ratCast (h : Irrational x) {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : Irrational (x / q) := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ← cast_inv]
exact h.mul_ratCast (inv_ne_zero hq)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias div_rat := div_ratCast
theorem of_intCast_div (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (m / x)) : Irrational x :=
h.div_cases.resolve_left m.not_irrational
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_int_div := of_intCast_div
theorem of_div_intCast (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (x / m)) : Irrational x :=
h.div_cases.resolve_right m.not_irrational
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_div_int := of_div_intCast
theorem intCast_div (h : Irrational x) {m : ℤ} (hm : m ≠ 0) : Irrational (m / x) :=
h.inv.intCast_mul hm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias int_div := intCast_div
theorem div_intCast (h : Irrational x) {m : ℤ} (hm : m ≠ 0) : Irrational (x / m) := by
rw [← cast_intCast]
refine h.div_ratCast ?_
rwa [Int.cast_ne_zero]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias div_int := div_intCast
theorem of_natCast_div (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (m / x)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_intCast_div m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_nat_div := of_natCast_div
theorem of_div_natCast (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (x / m)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_div_intCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_div_nat := of_div_natCast
theorem natCast_div (h : Irrational x) {m : ℕ} (hm : m ≠ 0) : Irrational (m / x) :=
h.inv.natCast_mul hm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias nat_div := natCast_div
theorem div_natCast (h : Irrational x) {m : ℕ} (hm : m ≠ 0) : Irrational (x / m) :=
h.div_intCast <| by rwa [Int.natCast_ne_zero]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias div_nat := div_natCast
theorem of_one_div (h : Irrational (1 / x)) : Irrational x :=
of_ratCast_div 1 <| by rwa [cast_one]
/-!
#### Natural and integer power
-/
theorem of_mul_self (h : Irrational (x * x)) : Irrational x :=
h.mul_cases.elim id id
theorem of_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, Irrational (x ^ n) → Irrational x
| 0 => fun h => by
| rw [pow_zero] at h
exact (h ⟨1, cast_one⟩).elim
| n + 1 => fun h => by
rw [pow_succ] at h
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Irrational.lean | 473 | 476 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.Spec
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.Ring.Constructions
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Elementwise
/-!
# The category of schemes
A scheme is a locally ringed space such that every point is contained in some open set
where there is an isomorphism of presheaves between the restriction to that open set,
and the structure sheaf of `Spec R`, for some commutative ring `R`.
A morphism of schemes is just a morphism of the underlying locally ringed spaces.
-/
-- Explicit universe annotations were used in this file to improve performance https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12737
universe u
noncomputable section
open TopologicalSpace
open CategoryTheory
open TopCat
open Opposite
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
/-- We define `Scheme` as an `X : LocallyRingedSpace`,
along with a proof that every point has an open neighbourhood `U`
so that the restriction of `X` to `U` is isomorphic,
as a locally ringed space, to `Spec.toLocallyRingedSpace.obj (op R)`
for some `R : CommRingCat`.
-/
structure Scheme extends LocallyRingedSpace where
local_affine :
∀ x : toLocallyRingedSpace,
∃ (U : OpenNhds x) (R : CommRingCat),
Nonempty
(toLocallyRingedSpace.restrict U.isOpenEmbedding ≅ Spec.toLocallyRingedSpace.obj (op R))
namespace Scheme
instance : CoeSort Scheme Type* where
coe X := X.carrier
/-- The type of open sets of a scheme. -/
abbrev Opens (X : Scheme) : Type* := TopologicalSpace.Opens X
/-- A morphism between schemes is a morphism between the underlying locally ringed spaces. -/
structure Hom (X Y : Scheme)
extends toLRSHom' : X.toLocallyRingedSpace.Hom Y.toLocallyRingedSpace where
/-- Cast a morphism of schemes into morphisms of local ringed spaces. -/
abbrev Hom.toLRSHom {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X.Hom Y) :
X.toLocallyRingedSpace ⟶ Y.toLocallyRingedSpace :=
f.toLRSHom'
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def Hom.Simps.toLRSHom {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X.Hom Y) :
X.toLocallyRingedSpace ⟶ Y.toLocallyRingedSpace :=
f.toLRSHom
initialize_simps_projections Hom (toLRSHom' → toLRSHom)
/-- Schemes are a full subcategory of locally ringed spaces.
-/
instance : Category Scheme where
Hom := Hom
id X := Hom.mk (𝟙 X.toLocallyRingedSpace)
comp f g := Hom.mk (f.toLRSHom ≫ g.toLRSHom)
/-- `f ⁻¹ᵁ U` is notation for `(Opens.map f.base).obj U`,
the preimage of an open set `U` under `f`. -/
scoped[AlgebraicGeometry] notation3:90 f:91 " ⁻¹ᵁ " U:90 =>
@Prefunctor.obj (Scheme.Opens _) _ (Scheme.Opens _) _
(Opens.map (f : Scheme.Hom _ _).base).toPrefunctor U
/-- `Γ(X, U)` is notation for `X.presheaf.obj (op U)`. -/
scoped[AlgebraicGeometry] notation3 "Γ(" X ", " U ")" =>
(PresheafedSpace.presheaf (SheafedSpace.toPresheafedSpace
(LocallyRingedSpace.toSheafedSpace (Scheme.toLocallyRingedSpace X)))).obj
(op (α := Scheme.Opens _) U)
instance {X : Scheme.{u}} : Subsingleton Γ(X, ⊥) :=
CommRingCat.subsingleton_of_isTerminal X.sheaf.isTerminalOfEmpty
@[continuity, fun_prop]
lemma Hom.continuous {X Y : Scheme} (f : X.Hom Y) : Continuous f.base := f.base.hom.2
/-- The structure sheaf of a scheme. -/
protected abbrev sheaf (X : Scheme) :=
X.toSheafedSpace.sheaf
namespace Hom
variable {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : Hom X Y) {U U' : Y.Opens} {V V' : X.Opens}
/-- Given a morphism of schemes `f : X ⟶ Y`, and open `U ⊆ Y`,
this is the induced map `Γ(Y, U) ⟶ Γ(X, f ⁻¹ᵁ U)`. -/
abbrev app (U : Y.Opens) : Γ(Y, U) ⟶ Γ(X, f ⁻¹ᵁ U) :=
f.c.app (op U)
/-- Given a morphism of schemes `f : X ⟶ Y`,
this is the induced map `Γ(Y, ⊤) ⟶ Γ(X, ⊤)`. -/
abbrev appTop : Γ(Y, ⊤) ⟶ Γ(X, ⊤) :=
f.app ⊤
@[reassoc]
lemma naturality (i : op U' ⟶ op U) :
Y.presheaf.map i ≫ f.app U = f.app U' ≫ X.presheaf.map ((Opens.map f.base).map i.unop).op :=
f.c.naturality i
/-- Given a morphism of schemes `f : X ⟶ Y`, and open sets `U ⊆ Y`, `V ⊆ f ⁻¹' U`,
this is the induced map `Γ(Y, U) ⟶ Γ(X, V)`. -/
def appLE (U : Y.Opens) (V : X.Opens) (e : V ≤ f ⁻¹ᵁ U) : Γ(Y, U) ⟶ Γ(X, V) :=
f.app U ≫ X.presheaf.map (homOfLE e).op
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma appLE_map (e : V ≤ f ⁻¹ᵁ U) (i : op V ⟶ op V') :
f.appLE U V e ≫ X.presheaf.map i = f.appLE U V' (i.unop.le.trans e) := by
rw [Hom.appLE, Category.assoc, ← Functor.map_comp]
rfl
@[reassoc]
lemma appLE_map' (e : V ≤ f ⁻¹ᵁ U) (i : V = V') :
f.appLE U V' (i ▸ e) ≫ X.presheaf.map (eqToHom i).op = f.appLE U V e :=
appLE_map _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma map_appLE (e : V ≤ f ⁻¹ᵁ U) (i : op U' ⟶ op U) :
Y.presheaf.map i ≫ f.appLE U V e =
f.appLE U' V (e.trans ((Opens.map f.base).map i.unop).le) := by
rw [Hom.appLE, f.naturality_assoc, ← Functor.map_comp]
rfl
@[reassoc]
lemma map_appLE' (e : V ≤ f ⁻¹ᵁ U) (i : U' = U) :
Y.presheaf.map (eqToHom i).op ≫ f.appLE U' V (i ▸ e) = f.appLE U V e :=
map_appLE _ _ _
lemma app_eq_appLE {U : Y.Opens} :
f.app U = f.appLE U _ le_rfl := by
simp [Hom.appLE]
lemma appLE_eq_app {U : Y.Opens} :
f.appLE U (f ⁻¹ᵁ U) le_rfl = f.app U :=
(app_eq_appLE f).symm
lemma appLE_congr (e : V ≤ f ⁻¹ᵁ U) (e₁ : U = U') (e₂ : V = V')
(P : ∀ {R S : CommRingCat.{u}} (_ : R ⟶ S), Prop) :
P (f.appLE U V e) ↔ P (f.appLE U' V' (e₁ ▸ e₂ ▸ e)) := by
subst e₁; subst e₂; rfl
/-- A morphism of schemes `f : X ⟶ Y` induces a local ring homomorphism from
`Y.presheaf.stalk (f x)` to `X.presheaf.stalk x` for any `x : X`. -/
def stalkMap (x : X) : Y.presheaf.stalk (f.base x) ⟶ X.presheaf.stalk x :=
f.toLRSHom.stalkMap x
@[ext (iff := false)]
protected lemma ext {f g : X ⟶ Y} (h_base : f.base = g.base)
(h_app : ∀ U, f.app U ≫ X.presheaf.map
(eqToHom congr((Opens.map $h_base.symm).obj U)).op = g.app U) : f = g := by
cases f; cases g; congr 1
exact LocallyRingedSpace.Hom.ext' <| SheafedSpace.ext _ _ h_base
(TopCat.Presheaf.ext fun U ↦ by simpa using h_app U)
/-- An alternative ext lemma for scheme morphisms. -/
protected lemma ext' {f g : X ⟶ Y} (h : f.toLRSHom = g.toLRSHom) : f = g := by
cases f; cases g; congr 1
lemma preimage_iSup {ι} (U : ι → Opens Y) : f ⁻¹ᵁ iSup U = ⨆ i, f ⁻¹ᵁ U i :=
Opens.ext (by simp)
lemma preimage_iSup_eq_top {ι} {U : ι → Opens Y} (hU : iSup U = ⊤) :
⨆ i, f ⁻¹ᵁ U i = ⊤ := f.preimage_iSup U ▸ hU ▸ rfl
lemma preimage_le_preimage_of_le {U U' : Y.Opens} (hUU' : U ≤ U') :
f ⁻¹ᵁ U ≤ f ⁻¹ᵁ U' :=
fun _ ha ↦ hUU' ha
end Hom
@[simp]
lemma preimage_comp {X Y Z : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (U) :
(f ≫ g) ⁻¹ᵁ U = f ⁻¹ᵁ g ⁻¹ᵁ U := rfl
/-- The forgetful functor from `Scheme` to `LocallyRingedSpace`. -/
@[simps!]
def forgetToLocallyRingedSpace : Scheme ⥤ LocallyRingedSpace where
obj := toLocallyRingedSpace
map := Hom.toLRSHom
/-- The forget functor `Scheme ⥤ LocallyRingedSpace` is fully faithful. -/
@[simps preimage_toLRSHom]
def fullyFaithfulForgetToLocallyRingedSpace :
forgetToLocallyRingedSpace.FullyFaithful where
preimage := Hom.mk
instance : forgetToLocallyRingedSpace.Full :=
fullyFaithfulForgetToLocallyRingedSpace.full
instance : forgetToLocallyRingedSpace.Faithful :=
fullyFaithfulForgetToLocallyRingedSpace.faithful
/-- The forgetful functor from `Scheme` to `TopCat`. -/
@[simps!]
def forgetToTop : Scheme ⥤ TopCat :=
Scheme.forgetToLocallyRingedSpace ⋙ LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToTop
/-- An isomorphism of schemes induces a homeomorphism of the underlying topological spaces. -/
noncomputable def homeoOfIso {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (e : X ≅ Y) : X ≃ₜ Y :=
TopCat.homeoOfIso (forgetToTop.mapIso e)
@[simp]
lemma homeoOfIso_symm {X Y : Scheme} (e : X ≅ Y) :
(homeoOfIso e).symm = homeoOfIso e.symm := rfl
@[simp]
lemma homeoOfIso_apply {X Y : Scheme} (e : X ≅ Y) (x : X) :
homeoOfIso e x = e.hom.base x := rfl
alias _root_.CategoryTheory.Iso.schemeIsoToHomeo := homeoOfIso
/-- An isomorphism of schemes induces a homeomorphism of the underlying topological spaces. -/
noncomputable def Hom.homeomorph {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X.Hom Y) [IsIso (C := Scheme) f] :
X ≃ₜ Y :=
(asIso f).schemeIsoToHomeo
@[simp]
lemma Hom.homeomorph_apply {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X.Hom Y) [IsIso (C := Scheme) f] (x) :
f.homeomorph x = f.base x := rfl
-- Porting note: Lean seems not able to find this coercion any more
instance hasCoeToTopCat : CoeOut Scheme TopCat where
coe X := X.carrier
|
-- Porting note: added this unification hint just in case
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/Scheme.lean | 246 | 247 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin, Amelia Livingston, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Submonoid.Inverses
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FiniteType
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Defs
/-!
# Submonoid of inverses
## Main definitions
* `IsLocalization.invSubmonoid M S` is the submonoid of `S = M⁻¹R` consisting of inverses of
each element `x ∈ M`
## Implementation notes
See `Mathlib/RingTheory/Localization/Basic.lean` for a design overview.
## Tags
localization, ring localization, commutative ring localization, characteristic predicate,
commutative ring, field of fractions
-/
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] (M : Submonoid R) (S : Type*) [CommRing S]
variable [Algebra R S]
open Function
namespace IsLocalization
section InvSubmonoid
/-- The submonoid of `S = M⁻¹R` consisting of `{ 1 / x | x ∈ M }`. -/
def invSubmonoid : Submonoid S :=
(M.map (algebraMap R S)).leftInv
variable [IsLocalization M S]
theorem submonoid_map_le_is_unit : M.map (algebraMap R S) ≤ IsUnit.submonoid S := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact IsLocalization.map_units S ⟨_, ha⟩
/-- There is an equivalence of monoids between the image of `M` and `invSubmonoid`. -/
noncomputable abbrev equivInvSubmonoid : M.map (algebraMap R S) ≃* invSubmonoid M S :=
((M.map (algebraMap R S)).leftInvEquiv (submonoid_map_le_is_unit M S)).symm
/-- There is a canonical map from `M` to `invSubmonoid` sending `x` to `1 / x`. -/
noncomputable def toInvSubmonoid : M →* invSubmonoid M S :=
(equivInvSubmonoid M S).toMonoidHom.comp ((algebraMap R S : R →* S).submonoidMap M)
theorem toInvSubmonoid_surjective : Function.Surjective (toInvSubmonoid M S) :=
Function.Surjective.comp (β := M.map (algebraMap R S))
(Equiv.surjective (equivInvSubmonoid _ _).toEquiv) (MonoidHom.submonoidMap_surjective _ _)
@[simp]
theorem toInvSubmonoid_mul (m : M) : (toInvSubmonoid M S m : S) * algebraMap R S m = 1 :=
Submonoid.leftInvEquiv_symm_mul _ (submonoid_map_le_is_unit _ _) _
@[simp]
theorem mul_toInvSubmonoid (m : M) : algebraMap R S m * (toInvSubmonoid M S m : S) = 1 :=
Submonoid.mul_leftInvEquiv_symm _ (submonoid_map_le_is_unit _ _) ⟨_, _⟩
@[simp]
theorem smul_toInvSubmonoid (m : M) : m • (toInvSubmonoid M S m : S) = 1 := by
convert mul_toInvSubmonoid M S m
ext
rw [← Algebra.smul_def]
rfl
variable {S}
-- Porting note: `surj'` was taken, so use `surj''` instead
theorem surj'' (z : S) : ∃ (r : R) (m : M), z = r • (toInvSubmonoid M S m : S) := by
rcases IsLocalization.surj M z with ⟨⟨r, m⟩, e : z * _ = algebraMap R S r⟩
refine ⟨r, m, ?_⟩
rw [Algebra.smul_def, ← e, mul_assoc]
simp
theorem toInvSubmonoid_eq_mk' (x : M) : (toInvSubmonoid M S x : S) = mk' S 1 x := by
rw [← (IsLocalization.map_units S x).mul_left_inj]
simp
theorem mem_invSubmonoid_iff_exists_mk' (x : S) :
x ∈ invSubmonoid M S ↔ ∃ m : M, mk' S 1 m = x := by
simp_rw [← toInvSubmonoid_eq_mk']
exact ⟨fun h => ⟨_, congr_arg Subtype.val (toInvSubmonoid_surjective M S ⟨x, h⟩).choose_spec⟩,
fun h => h.choose_spec ▸ (toInvSubmonoid M S h.choose).prop⟩
variable (S)
|
theorem span_invSubmonoid : Submodule.span R (invSubmonoid M S : Set S) = ⊤ := by
rw [eq_top_iff]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Localization/InvSubmonoid.lean | 94 | 96 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.FullyFaithful
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Limits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Pullback.CommSq
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.StrictInitial
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.FunctorCategory.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Constructions.FiniteProductsOfBinaryProducts
/-!
# Universal colimits and van Kampen colimits
## Main definitions
- `CategoryTheory.IsUniversalColimit`: A (colimit) cocone over a diagram `F : J ⥤ C` is universal
if it is stable under pullbacks.
- `CategoryTheory.IsVanKampenColimit`: A (colimit) cocone over a diagram `F : J ⥤ C` is van
Kampen if for every cocone `c'` over the pullback of the diagram `F' : J ⥤ C'`,
`c'` is colimiting iff `c'` is the pullback of `c`.
## References
- https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/van+Kampen+colimit
- [Stephen Lack and Paweł Sobociński, Adhesive Categories][adhesive2004]
-/
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace CategoryTheory
universe v' u' v u
variable {J : Type v'} [Category.{u'} J] {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable {K : Type*} [Category K] {D : Type*} [Category D]
section NatTrans
/-- A natural transformation is equifibered if every commutative square of the following form is
a pullback.
```
F(X) → F(Y)
↓ ↓
G(X) → G(Y)
```
-/
def NatTrans.Equifibered {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ G) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃i j : J⦄ (f : i ⟶ j), IsPullback (F.map f) (α.app i) (α.app j) (G.map f)
theorem NatTrans.equifibered_of_isIso {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ G) [IsIso α] : Equifibered α :=
fun _ _ f => IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨NatTrans.naturality _ f⟩
theorem NatTrans.Equifibered.comp {F G H : J ⥤ C} {α : F ⟶ G} {β : G ⟶ H} (hα : Equifibered α)
(hβ : Equifibered β) : Equifibered (α ≫ β) :=
fun _ _ f => (hα f).paste_vert (hβ f)
theorem NatTrans.Equifibered.whiskerRight {F G : J ⥤ C} {α : F ⟶ G} (hα : Equifibered α)
(H : C ⥤ D) [∀ (i j : J) (f : j ⟶ i), PreservesLimit (cospan (α.app i) (G.map f)) H] :
Equifibered (whiskerRight α H) :=
fun _ _ f => (hα f).map H
theorem NatTrans.Equifibered.whiskerLeft {K : Type*} [Category K] {F G : J ⥤ C} {α : F ⟶ G}
(hα : Equifibered α) (H : K ⥤ J) : Equifibered (whiskerLeft H α) :=
fun _ _ f => hα (H.map f)
theorem mapPair_equifibered {F F' : Discrete WalkingPair ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ F') :
NatTrans.Equifibered α := by
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨j⟩ ⟨⟨rfl : _ = j⟩⟩
all_goals
dsimp; simp only [Discrete.functor_map_id]
exact IsPullback.of_horiz_isIso ⟨by simp only [Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp]⟩
theorem NatTrans.equifibered_of_discrete {ι : Type*} {F G : Discrete ι ⥤ C}
(α : F ⟶ G) : NatTrans.Equifibered α := by
rintro ⟨i⟩ ⟨j⟩ ⟨⟨rfl : i = j⟩⟩
simp only [Discrete.functor_map_id]
exact IsPullback.of_horiz_isIso ⟨by rw [Category.id_comp, Category.comp_id]⟩
end NatTrans
/-- A (colimit) cocone over a diagram `F : J ⥤ C` is universal if it is stable under pullbacks. -/
def IsUniversalColimit {F : J ⥤ C} (c : Cocone F) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃F' : J ⥤ C⦄ (c' : Cocone F') (α : F' ⟶ F) (f : c'.pt ⟶ c.pt)
(_ : α ≫ c.ι = c'.ι ≫ (Functor.const J).map f) (_ : NatTrans.Equifibered α),
(∀ j : J, IsPullback (c'.ι.app j) (α.app j) f (c.ι.app j)) → Nonempty (IsColimit c')
/-- A (colimit) cocone over a diagram `F : J ⥤ C` is van Kampen if for every cocone `c'` over the
pullback of the diagram `F' : J ⥤ C'`, `c'` is colimiting iff `c'` is the pullback of `c`.
TODO: Show that this is iff the functor `C ⥤ Catᵒᵖ` sending `x` to `C/x` preserves it.
TODO: Show that this is iff the inclusion functor `C ⥤ Span(C)` preserves it.
-/
def IsVanKampenColimit {F : J ⥤ C} (c : Cocone F) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃F' : J ⥤ C⦄ (c' : Cocone F') (α : F' ⟶ F) (f : c'.pt ⟶ c.pt)
(_ : α ≫ c.ι = c'.ι ≫ (Functor.const J).map f) (_ : NatTrans.Equifibered α),
Nonempty (IsColimit c') ↔ ∀ j : J, IsPullback (c'.ι.app j) (α.app j) f (c.ι.app j)
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.isUniversal {F : J ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F} (H : IsVanKampenColimit c) :
IsUniversalColimit c :=
fun _ c' α f h hα => (H c' α f h hα).mpr
/-- A universal colimit is a colimit. -/
noncomputable def IsUniversalColimit.isColimit {F : J ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F}
(h : IsUniversalColimit c) : IsColimit c := by
refine ((h c (𝟙 F) (𝟙 c.pt :) (by rw [Functor.map_id, Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp])
(NatTrans.equifibered_of_isIso _)) fun j => ?_).some
haveI : IsIso (𝟙 c.pt) := inferInstance
exact IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨by simp⟩
/-- A van Kampen colimit is a colimit. -/
noncomputable def IsVanKampenColimit.isColimit {F : J ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F}
(h : IsVanKampenColimit c) : IsColimit c :=
h.isUniversal.isColimit
theorem IsInitial.isVanKampenColimit [HasStrictInitialObjects C] {X : C} (h : IsInitial X) :
IsVanKampenColimit (asEmptyCocone X) := by
intro F' c' α f hf hα
have : F' = Functor.empty C := by apply Functor.hext <;> rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩
subst this
haveI := h.isIso_to f
refine ⟨by rintro _ ⟨⟨⟩⟩,
fun _ => ⟨IsColimit.ofIsoColimit h (Cocones.ext (asIso f).symm <| by rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩)⟩⟩
section Functor
theorem IsUniversalColimit.of_iso {F : J ⥤ C} {c c' : Cocone F} (hc : IsUniversalColimit c)
(e : c ≅ c') : IsUniversalColimit c' := by
intro F' c'' α f h hα H
have : c'.ι ≫ (Functor.const J).map e.inv.hom = c.ι := by
ext j
exact e.inv.2 j
apply hc c'' α (f ≫ e.inv.1) (by rw [Functor.map_comp, ← reassoc_of% h, this]) hα
intro j
rw [← Category.comp_id (α.app j)]
have : IsIso e.inv.hom := Functor.map_isIso (Cocones.forget _) e.inv
exact (H j).paste_vert (IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨by simp⟩)
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.of_iso {F : J ⥤ C} {c c' : Cocone F} (H : IsVanKampenColimit c)
(e : c ≅ c') : IsVanKampenColimit c' := by
intro F' c'' α f h hα
have : c'.ι ≫ (Functor.const J).map e.inv.hom = c.ι := by
ext j
exact e.inv.2 j
rw [H c'' α (f ≫ e.inv.1) (by rw [Functor.map_comp, ← reassoc_of% h, this]) hα]
apply forall_congr'
intro j
conv_lhs => rw [← Category.comp_id (α.app j)]
haveI : IsIso e.inv.hom := Functor.map_isIso (Cocones.forget _) e.inv
exact (IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨by simp⟩).paste_vert_iff (NatTrans.congr_app h j).symm
|
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.precompose_isIso {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ G) [IsIso α]
{c : Cocone G} (hc : IsVanKampenColimit c) :
IsVanKampenColimit ((Cocones.precompose α).obj c) := by
intros F' c' α' f e hα
refine (hc c' (α' ≫ α) f ((Category.assoc _ _ _).trans e)
(hα.comp (NatTrans.equifibered_of_isIso _))).trans ?_
apply forall_congr'
intro j
simp only [Functor.const_obj_obj, NatTrans.comp_app,
Cocones.precompose_obj_pt, Cocones.precompose_obj_ι]
have : IsPullback (α.app j ≫ c.ι.app j) (α.app j) (𝟙 _) (c.ι.app j) :=
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/VanKampen.lean | 153 | 164 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Eric Rodriguez. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Rodriguez
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Units.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Cast
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Tactic.DeriveFintype
/-!
# Sign function
This file defines the sign function for types with zero and a decidable less-than relation, and
proves some basic theorems about it.
-/
-- Don't generate unnecessary `sizeOf_spec` lemmas which the `simpNF` linter will complain about.
set_option genSizeOfSpec false in
/-- The type of signs. -/
inductive SignType
| zero
| neg
| pos
deriving DecidableEq, Inhabited, Fintype
namespace SignType
instance : Zero SignType :=
⟨zero⟩
instance : One SignType :=
⟨pos⟩
instance : Neg SignType :=
⟨fun s =>
match s with
| neg => pos
| zero => zero
| pos => neg⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_eq_zero : zero = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem neg_eq_neg_one : neg = -1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem pos_eq_one : pos = 1 :=
rfl
instance : Mul SignType :=
⟨fun x y =>
match x with
| neg => -y
| zero => zero
| pos => y⟩
/-- The less-than-or-equal relation on signs. -/
protected inductive LE : SignType → SignType → Prop
| of_neg (a) : SignType.LE neg a
| zero : SignType.LE zero zero
| of_pos (a) : SignType.LE a pos
instance : LE SignType :=
⟨SignType.LE⟩
instance LE.decidableRel : DecidableRel SignType.LE := fun a b => by
cases a <;> cases b <;> first | exact isTrue (by constructor)| exact isFalse (by rintro ⟨_⟩)
instance decidableEq : DecidableEq SignType := fun a b => by
cases a <;> cases b <;> first | exact isTrue (by constructor)| exact isFalse (by rintro ⟨_⟩)
private lemma mul_comm : ∀ (a b : SignType), a * b = b * a := by rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ <;> rfl
private lemma mul_assoc : ∀ (a b c : SignType), (a * b) * c = a * (b * c) := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ <;> rfl
/- We can define a `Field` instance on `SignType`, but it's not mathematically sensible,
so we only define the `CommGroupWithZero`. -/
instance : CommGroupWithZero SignType where
zero := 0
one := 1
mul := (· * ·)
inv := id
mul_zero a := by cases a <;> rfl
zero_mul a := by cases a <;> rfl
mul_one a := by cases a <;> rfl
one_mul a := by cases a <;> rfl
mul_inv_cancel a ha := by cases a <;> trivial
mul_comm := mul_comm
mul_assoc := mul_assoc
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, by rintro ⟨_⟩⟩
inv_zero := rfl
private lemma le_antisymm (a b : SignType) (_ : a ≤ b) (_ : b ≤ a) : a = b := by
cases a <;> cases b <;> trivial
private lemma le_trans (a b c : SignType) (_ : a ≤ b) (_ : b ≤ c) : a ≤ c := by
cases a <;> cases b <;> cases c <;> tauto
instance : LinearOrder SignType where
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl a := by cases a <;> constructor
le_total a b := by cases a <;> cases b <;> first | left; constructor | right; constructor
le_antisymm := le_antisymm
le_trans := le_trans
toDecidableLE := LE.decidableRel
toDecidableEq := SignType.decidableEq
instance : BoundedOrder SignType where
| top := 1
le_top := LE.of_pos
| Mathlib/Data/Sign.lean | 114 | 115 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Thomas Browning. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Index
/-!
# Complements
In this file we define the complement of a subgroup.
## Main definitions
- `Subgroup.IsComplement S T` where `S` and `T` are subsets of `G` states that every `g : G` can be
written uniquely as a product `s * t` for `s ∈ S`, `t ∈ T`.
- `H.LeftTransversal` where `H` is a subgroup of `G` is the type of all left-complements of `H`,
i.e. the set of all `S : Set G` that contain exactly one element of each left coset of `H`.
- `H.RightTransversal` where `H` is a subgroup of `G` is the set of all right-complements of `H`,
i.e. the set of all `T : Set G` that contain exactly one element of each right coset of `H`.
## Main results
- `isComplement'_of_coprime` : Subgroups of coprime order are complements.
-/
open Function Set
open scoped Pointwise
namespace Subgroup
variable {G : Type*} [Group G] (H K : Subgroup G) (S T : Set G)
/-- `S` and `T` are complements if `(*) : S × T → G` is a bijection.
This notion generalizes left transversals, right transversals, and complementary subgroups. -/
@[to_additive "`S` and `T` are complements if `(+) : S × T → G` is a bijection"]
def IsComplement : Prop :=
Function.Bijective fun x : S × T => x.1.1 * x.2.1
/-- `H` and `K` are complements if `(*) : H × K → G` is a bijection -/
@[to_additive "`H` and `K` are complements if `(+) : H × K → G` is a bijection"]
abbrev IsComplement' :=
IsComplement (H : Set G) (K : Set G)
/-- The set of left-complements of `T : Set G` -/
@[to_additive (attr := deprecated IsComplement (since := "2024-12-18"))
"The set of left-complements of `T : Set G`"]
def leftTransversals : Set (Set G) :=
{ S : Set G | IsComplement S T }
/-- The set of right-complements of `S : Set G` -/
@[to_additive (attr := deprecated IsComplement (since := "2024-12-18"))
"The set of right-complements of `S : Set G`"]
def rightTransversals : Set (Set G) :=
{ T : Set G | IsComplement S T }
variable {H K S T}
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement'_def : IsComplement' H K ↔ IsComplement (H : Set G) (K : Set G) :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement_iff_existsUnique :
IsComplement S T ↔ ∀ g : G, ∃! x : S × T, x.1.1 * x.2.1 = g :=
Function.bijective_iff_existsUnique _
@[to_additive]
theorem IsComplement.existsUnique (h : IsComplement S T) (g : G) :
∃! x : S × T, x.1.1 * x.2.1 = g :=
isComplement_iff_existsUnique.mp h g
@[to_additive]
theorem IsComplement'.symm (h : IsComplement' H K) : IsComplement' K H := by
let ϕ : H × K ≃ K × H :=
Equiv.mk (fun x => ⟨x.2⁻¹, x.1⁻¹⟩) (fun x => ⟨x.2⁻¹, x.1⁻¹⟩)
(fun x => Prod.ext (inv_inv _) (inv_inv _)) fun x => Prod.ext (inv_inv _) (inv_inv _)
let ψ : G ≃ G := Equiv.mk (fun g : G => g⁻¹) (fun g : G => g⁻¹) inv_inv inv_inv
suffices hf : (ψ ∘ fun x : H × K => x.1.1 * x.2.1) = (fun x : K × H => x.1.1 * x.2.1) ∘ ϕ by
rw [isComplement'_def, IsComplement, ← Equiv.bijective_comp ϕ]
apply (congr_arg Function.Bijective hf).mp -- Porting note: This was a `rw` in mathlib3
rwa [ψ.comp_bijective]
exact funext fun x => mul_inv_rev _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement'_comm : IsComplement' H K ↔ IsComplement' K H :=
⟨IsComplement'.symm, IsComplement'.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement_univ_singleton {g : G} : IsComplement (univ : Set G) {g} :=
⟨fun ⟨_, _, rfl⟩ ⟨_, _, rfl⟩ h => Prod.ext (Subtype.ext (mul_right_cancel h)) rfl, fun x =>
⟨⟨⟨x * g⁻¹, ⟨⟩⟩, g, rfl⟩, inv_mul_cancel_right x g⟩⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement_singleton_univ {g : G} : IsComplement ({g} : Set G) univ :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨_, rfl⟩, _⟩ ⟨⟨_, rfl⟩, _⟩ h => Prod.ext rfl (Subtype.ext (mul_left_cancel h)), fun x =>
⟨⟨⟨g, rfl⟩, g⁻¹ * x, ⟨⟩⟩, mul_inv_cancel_left g x⟩⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement_singleton_left {g : G} : IsComplement {g} S ↔ S = univ := by
refine
⟨fun h => top_le_iff.mp fun x _ => ?_, fun h => (congr_arg _ h).mpr isComplement_singleton_univ⟩
obtain ⟨⟨⟨z, rfl : z = g⟩, y, _⟩, hy⟩ := h.2 (g * x)
rwa [← mul_left_cancel hy]
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement_singleton_right {g : G} : IsComplement S {g} ↔ S = univ := by
refine
⟨fun h => top_le_iff.mp fun x _ => ?_, fun h => h ▸ isComplement_univ_singleton⟩
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := h.2 (x * g)
conv_rhs at hy => rw [← show y.2.1 = g from y.2.2]
rw [← mul_right_cancel hy]
exact y.1.2
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement_univ_left : IsComplement univ S ↔ ∃ g : G, S = {g} := by
refine
⟨fun h => Set.exists_eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_subsingleton.mpr ⟨?_, fun a ha b hb => ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨a, _⟩ := h.2 1
exact ⟨a.2.1, a.2.2⟩
· have : (⟨⟨_, mem_top a⁻¹⟩, ⟨a, ha⟩⟩ : (⊤ : Set G) × S) = ⟨⟨_, mem_top b⁻¹⟩, ⟨b, hb⟩⟩ :=
h.1 ((inv_mul_cancel a).trans (inv_mul_cancel b).symm)
exact Subtype.ext_iff.mp (Prod.ext_iff.mp this).2
· rintro ⟨g, rfl⟩
exact isComplement_univ_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement_univ_right : IsComplement S univ ↔ ∃ g : G, S = {g} := by
refine
⟨fun h => Set.exists_eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_subsingleton.mpr ⟨?_, fun a ha b hb => ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨a, _⟩ := h.2 1
exact ⟨a.1.1, a.1.2⟩
· have : (⟨⟨a, ha⟩, ⟨_, mem_top a⁻¹⟩⟩ : S × (⊤ : Set G)) = ⟨⟨b, hb⟩, ⟨_, mem_top b⁻¹⟩⟩ :=
h.1 ((mul_inv_cancel a).trans (mul_inv_cancel b).symm)
exact Subtype.ext_iff.mp (Prod.ext_iff.mp this).1
· rintro ⟨g, rfl⟩
exact isComplement_singleton_univ
@[to_additive]
lemma IsComplement.mul_eq (h : IsComplement S T) : S * T = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun x ↦ by simpa [mem_mul] using (h.existsUnique x).exists
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma not_isComplement_empty_left : ¬ IsComplement ∅ T :=
fun h ↦ by simpa [eq_comm (a := ∅)] using h.mul_eq
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma not_isComplement_empty_right : ¬ IsComplement S ∅ :=
fun h ↦ by simpa [eq_comm (a := ∅)] using h.mul_eq
@[to_additive]
lemma IsComplement.nonempty_left (hst : IsComplement S T) : S.Nonempty := by
contrapose! hst; simp [hst]
@[to_additive]
lemma IsComplement.nonempty_right (hst : IsComplement S T) : T.Nonempty := by
contrapose! hst; simp [hst]
@[to_additive] lemma IsComplement.pairwiseDisjoint_smul (hst : IsComplement S T) :
S.PairwiseDisjoint (· • T) := fun a ha b hb hab ↦ disjoint_iff_forall_ne.2 <| by
rintro _ ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩ _ ⟨d, hd, rfl⟩
exact hst.1.ne (a₁ := (⟨a, ha⟩, ⟨c, hc⟩)) (a₂:= (⟨b, hb⟩, ⟨d, hd⟩)) (by simp [hab])
@[to_additive AddSubgroup.IsComplement.card_mul_card]
lemma IsComplement.card_mul_card (h : IsComplement S T) : Nat.card S * Nat.card T = Nat.card G :=
(Nat.card_prod _ _).symm.trans <| Nat.card_congr <| Equiv.ofBijective _ h
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement'_top_bot : IsComplement' (⊤ : Subgroup G) ⊥ :=
isComplement_univ_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement'_bot_top : IsComplement' (⊥ : Subgroup G) ⊤ :=
isComplement_singleton_univ
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem isComplement'_bot_left : IsComplement' ⊥ H ↔ H = ⊤ :=
isComplement_singleton_left.trans coe_eq_univ
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem isComplement'_bot_right : IsComplement' H ⊥ ↔ H = ⊤ :=
isComplement_singleton_right.trans coe_eq_univ
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem isComplement'_top_left : IsComplement' ⊤ H ↔ H = ⊥ :=
isComplement_univ_left.trans coe_eq_singleton
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem isComplement'_top_right : IsComplement' H ⊤ ↔ H = ⊥ :=
isComplement_univ_right.trans coe_eq_singleton
@[to_additive]
lemma isComplement_iff_existsUnique_inv_mul_mem :
IsComplement S T ↔ ∀ g, ∃! s : S, (s : G)⁻¹ * g ∈ T := by
convert isComplement_iff_existsUnique with g
constructor <;> rintro ⟨x, hx, hx'⟩
· exact ⟨(x, ⟨_, hx⟩), by simp, by aesop⟩
· exact ⟨x.1, by simp [← hx], fun y hy ↦ (Prod.ext_iff.1 <| by simpa using hx' (y, ⟨_, hy⟩)).1⟩
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[to_additive
(attr := deprecated isComplement_iff_existsUnique_inv_mul_mem (since := "2024-12-18"))]
theorem mem_leftTransversals_iff_existsUnique_inv_mul_mem :
S ∈ leftTransversals T ↔ ∀ g : G, ∃! s : S, (s : G)⁻¹ * g ∈ T := by
rw [leftTransversals, Set.mem_setOf_eq, isComplement_iff_existsUnique]
refine ⟨fun h g => ?_, fun h g => ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨x, h1, h2⟩ := h g
exact
⟨x.1, (congr_arg (· ∈ T) (eq_inv_mul_of_mul_eq h1)).mp x.2.2, fun y hy =>
(Prod.ext_iff.mp (h2 ⟨y, (↑y)⁻¹ * g, hy⟩ (mul_inv_cancel_left ↑y g))).1⟩
· obtain ⟨x, h1, h2⟩ := h g
refine ⟨⟨x, (↑x)⁻¹ * g, h1⟩, mul_inv_cancel_left (↑x) g, fun y hy => ?_⟩
have hf := h2 y.1 ((congr_arg (· ∈ T) (eq_inv_mul_of_mul_eq hy)).mp y.2.2)
exact Prod.ext hf (Subtype.ext (eq_inv_mul_of_mul_eq (hf ▸ hy)))
@[to_additive]
lemma isComplement_iff_existsUnique_mul_inv_mem :
IsComplement S T ↔ ∀ g, ∃! t : T, g * (t : G)⁻¹ ∈ S := by
convert isComplement_iff_existsUnique with g
constructor <;> rintro ⟨x, hx, hx'⟩
· exact ⟨(⟨_, hx⟩, x), by simp, by aesop⟩
· exact ⟨x.2, by simp [← hx], fun y hy ↦ (Prod.ext_iff.1 <| by simpa using hx' (⟨_, hy⟩, y)).2⟩
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[to_additive
(attr := deprecated isComplement_iff_existsUnique_mul_inv_mem (since := "2024-12-18"))]
theorem mem_rightTransversals_iff_existsUnique_mul_inv_mem :
S ∈ rightTransversals T ↔ ∀ g : G, ∃! s : S, g * (s : G)⁻¹ ∈ T := by
rw [rightTransversals, Set.mem_setOf_eq, isComplement_iff_existsUnique]
refine ⟨fun h g => ?_, fun h g => ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨x, h1, h2⟩ := h g
exact
⟨x.2, (congr_arg (· ∈ T) (eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq h1)).mp x.1.2, fun y hy =>
(Prod.ext_iff.mp (h2 ⟨⟨g * (↑y)⁻¹, hy⟩, y⟩ (inv_mul_cancel_right g y))).2⟩
· obtain ⟨x, h1, h2⟩ := h g
refine ⟨⟨⟨g * (↑x)⁻¹, h1⟩, x⟩, inv_mul_cancel_right g x, fun y hy => ?_⟩
have hf := h2 y.2 ((congr_arg (· ∈ T) (eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq hy)).mp y.1.2)
exact Prod.ext (Subtype.ext (eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq (hf ▸ hy))) hf
@[to_additive]
lemma isComplement_subgroup_right_iff_existsUnique_quotientGroupMk :
IsComplement S H ↔ ∀ q : G ⧸ H, ∃! s : S, QuotientGroup.mk s.1 = q := by
simp_rw [isComplement_iff_existsUnique_inv_mul_mem, SetLike.mem_coe, ← QuotientGroup.eq,
QuotientGroup.forall_mk]
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[to_additive
| (attr := deprecated isComplement_subgroup_right_iff_existsUnique_quotientGroupMk
(since := "2024-12-18"))]
theorem mem_leftTransversals_iff_existsUnique_quotient_mk''_eq :
S ∈ leftTransversals (H : Set G) ↔
∀ q : Quotient (QuotientGroup.leftRel H), ∃! s : S, Quotient.mk'' s.1 = q := by
simp_rw [mem_leftTransversals_iff_existsUnique_inv_mul_mem, SetLike.mem_coe, ←
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Complement.lean | 248 | 253 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.