Context stringlengths 227 76.5k | target stringlengths 0 11.6k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 16 3.69k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Comma.Arrow
import Mathlib.Order.CompleteBooleanAlgebra
/-!
# Properties of morphisms
We provide the basic framework for talking about properties of morphisms.
The following meta-property is defined
* `RespectsLeft P Q`: `P` respects the property `Q` on the left if `P f → P (i ≫ f)` where
`i` satisfies `Q`.
* `RespectsRight P Q`: `P` respects the property `Q` on the right if `P f → P (f ≫ i)` where
`i` satisfies `Q`.
* `Respects`: `P` respects `Q` if `P` respects `Q` both on the left and on the right.
-/
universe w v v' u u'
open CategoryTheory Opposite
noncomputable section
namespace CategoryTheory
variable (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] {D : Type*} [Category D]
/-- A `MorphismProperty C` is a class of morphisms between objects in `C`. -/
def MorphismProperty :=
∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (_ : X ⟶ Y), Prop
instance : CompleteBooleanAlgebra (MorphismProperty C) where
le P₁ P₂ := ∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (f : X ⟶ Y), P₁ f → P₂ f
__ := inferInstanceAs (CompleteBooleanAlgebra (∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (_ : X ⟶ Y), Prop))
lemma MorphismProperty.le_def {P Q : MorphismProperty C} :
P ≤ Q ↔ ∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), P f → Q f := Iff.rfl
instance : Inhabited (MorphismProperty C) :=
⟨⊤⟩
lemma MorphismProperty.top_eq : (⊤ : MorphismProperty C) = fun _ _ _ => True := rfl
variable {C}
namespace MorphismProperty
@[ext]
lemma ext (W W' : MorphismProperty C) (h : ∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (f : X ⟶ Y), W f ↔ W' f) :
W = W' := by
funext X Y f
rw [h]
@[simp]
lemma top_apply {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : (⊤ : MorphismProperty C) f := by
simp only [top_eq]
lemma of_eq_top {P : MorphismProperty C} (h : P = ⊤) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : P f := by
simp [h]
@[simp]
lemma sSup_iff (S : Set (MorphismProperty C)) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
sSup S f ↔ ∃ (W : S), W.1 f := by
dsimp [sSup, iSup]
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, ⟨⟨_, ⟨⟨_, ⟨_, h⟩, rfl⟩, rfl⟩⟩, rfl⟩, hf⟩
exact ⟨⟨_, h⟩, hf⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨W, hW⟩, hf⟩
exact ⟨_, ⟨⟨_, ⟨_, ⟨⟨W, hW⟩, rfl⟩⟩, rfl⟩, rfl⟩, hf⟩
@[simp]
lemma iSup_iff {ι : Sort*} (W : ι → MorphismProperty C) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
iSup W f ↔ ∃ i, W i f := by
apply (sSup_iff (Set.range W) f).trans
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨_, i, rfl⟩, hf⟩
exact ⟨i, hf⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hf⟩
exact ⟨⟨_, i, rfl⟩, hf⟩
/-- The morphism property in `Cᵒᵖ` associated to a morphism property in `C` -/
@[simp]
def op (P : MorphismProperty C) : MorphismProperty Cᵒᵖ := fun _ _ f => P f.unop
/-- The morphism property in `C` associated to a morphism property in `Cᵒᵖ` -/
@[simp]
def unop (P : MorphismProperty Cᵒᵖ) : MorphismProperty C := fun _ _ f => P f.op
theorem unop_op (P : MorphismProperty C) : P.op.unop = P :=
rfl
theorem op_unop (P : MorphismProperty Cᵒᵖ) : P.unop.op = P :=
rfl
/-- The inverse image of a `MorphismProperty D` by a functor `C ⥤ D` -/
def inverseImage (P : MorphismProperty D) (F : C ⥤ D) : MorphismProperty C := fun _ _ f =>
P (F.map f)
@[simp]
lemma inverseImage_iff (P : MorphismProperty D) (F : C ⥤ D) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
P.inverseImage F f ↔ P (F.map f) := by rfl
/-- The image (up to isomorphisms) of a `MorphismProperty C` by a functor `C ⥤ D` -/
def map (P : MorphismProperty C) (F : C ⥤ D) : MorphismProperty D := fun _ _ f =>
∃ (X' Y' : C) (f' : X' ⟶ Y') (_ : P f'), Nonempty (Arrow.mk (F.map f') ≅ Arrow.mk f)
lemma map_mem_map (P : MorphismProperty C) (F : C ⥤ D) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (hf : P f) :
(P.map F) (F.map f) := ⟨X, Y, f, hf, ⟨Iso.refl _⟩⟩
lemma monotone_map (F : C ⥤ D) :
Monotone (map · F) := by
intro P Q h X Y f ⟨X', Y', f', hf', ⟨e⟩⟩
exact ⟨X', Y', f', h _ hf', ⟨e⟩⟩
section
variable (P : MorphismProperty C)
/-- The set in `Set (Arrow C)` which corresponds to `P : MorphismProperty C`. -/
def toSet : Set (Arrow C) := setOf (fun f ↦ P f.hom)
/-- The family of morphisms indexed by `P.toSet` which corresponds
to `P : MorphismProperty C`, see `MorphismProperty.ofHoms_homFamily`. -/
def homFamily (f : P.toSet) : f.1.left ⟶ f.1.right := f.1.hom
lemma homFamily_apply (f : P.toSet) : P.homFamily f = f.1.hom := rfl
@[simp]
lemma homFamily_arrow_mk {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (hf : P f) :
P.homFamily ⟨Arrow.mk f, hf⟩ = f := rfl
@[simp]
lemma arrow_mk_mem_toSet_iff {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Arrow.mk f ∈ P.toSet ↔ P f := Iff.rfl
lemma of_eq {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} (hf : P f)
{X' Y' : C} {f' : X' ⟶ Y'}
(hX : X = X') (hY : Y = Y') (h : f' = eqToHom hX.symm ≫ f ≫ eqToHom hY) :
P f' := by
rw [← P.arrow_mk_mem_toSet_iff] at hf ⊢
rwa [(Arrow.mk_eq_mk_iff f' f).2 ⟨hX.symm, hY.symm, h⟩]
end
/-- The class of morphisms given by a family of morphisms `f i : X i ⟶ Y i`. -/
inductive ofHoms {ι : Type*} {X Y : ι → C} (f : ∀ i, X i ⟶ Y i) : MorphismProperty C
| mk (i : ι) : ofHoms f (f i)
lemma ofHoms_iff {ι : Type*} {X Y : ι → C} (f : ∀ i, X i ⟶ Y i) {A B : C} (g : A ⟶ B) :
ofHoms f g ↔ ∃ i, Arrow.mk g = Arrow.mk (f i) := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨i⟩
exact ⟨i, rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨i, h⟩
rw [← (ofHoms f).arrow_mk_mem_toSet_iff, h, arrow_mk_mem_toSet_iff]
constructor
@[simp]
lemma ofHoms_homFamily (P : MorphismProperty C) : ofHoms P.homFamily = P := by
ext _ _ f
constructor
· intro hf
rw [ofHoms_iff] at hf
obtain ⟨⟨f, hf⟩, ⟨_, _⟩⟩ := hf
exact hf
· intro hf
exact ⟨(⟨f, hf⟩ : P.toSet)⟩
/-- A morphism property `P` satisfies `P.RespectsRight Q` if it is stable under post-composition
with morphisms satisfying `Q`, i.e. whenever `P` holds for `f` and `Q` holds for `i` then `P`
holds for `f ≫ i`. -/
class RespectsRight (P Q : MorphismProperty C) : Prop where
postcomp {X Y Z : C} (i : Y ⟶ Z) (hi : Q i) (f : X ⟶ Y) (hf : P f) : P (f ≫ i)
/-- A morphism property `P` satisfies `P.RespectsLeft Q` if it is stable under
pre-composition with morphisms satisfying `Q`, i.e. whenever `P` holds for `f`
and `Q` holds for `i` then `P` holds for `i ≫ f`. -/
class RespectsLeft (P Q : MorphismProperty C) : Prop where
precomp {X Y Z : C} (i : X ⟶ Y) (hi : Q i) (f : Y ⟶ Z) (hf : P f) : P (i ≫ f)
/-- A morphism property `P` satisfies `P.Respects Q` if it is stable under composition on the
left and right by morphisms satisfying `Q`. -/
class Respects (P Q : MorphismProperty C) : Prop extends P.RespectsLeft Q, P.RespectsRight Q where
instance (P Q : MorphismProperty C) [P.RespectsLeft Q] [P.RespectsRight Q] : P.Respects Q where
instance (P Q : MorphismProperty C) [P.RespectsLeft Q] : P.op.RespectsRight Q.op where
postcomp i hi f hf := RespectsLeft.precomp (Q := Q) i.unop hi f.unop hf
instance (P Q : MorphismProperty C) [P.RespectsRight Q] : P.op.RespectsLeft Q.op where
precomp i hi f hf := RespectsRight.postcomp (Q := Q) i.unop hi f.unop hf
instance RespectsLeft.inf (P₁ P₂ Q : MorphismProperty C) [P₁.RespectsLeft Q]
[P₂.RespectsLeft Q] : (P₁ ⊓ P₂).RespectsLeft Q where
precomp i hi f hf := ⟨precomp i hi f hf.left, precomp i hi f hf.right⟩
instance RespectsRight.inf (P₁ P₂ Q : MorphismProperty C) [P₁.RespectsRight Q]
[P₂.RespectsRight Q] : (P₁ ⊓ P₂).RespectsRight Q where
postcomp i hi f hf := ⟨postcomp i hi f hf.left, postcomp i hi f hf.right⟩
variable (C)
/-- The `MorphismProperty C` satisfied by isomorphisms in `C`. -/
def isomorphisms : MorphismProperty C := fun _ _ f => IsIso f
/-- The `MorphismProperty C` satisfied by monomorphisms in `C`. -/
def monomorphisms : MorphismProperty C := fun _ _ f => Mono f
/-- The `MorphismProperty C` satisfied by epimorphisms in `C`. -/
def epimorphisms : MorphismProperty C := fun _ _ f => Epi f
section
variable {C}
/-- `P` respects isomorphisms, if it respects the morphism property `isomorphisms C`, i.e.
it is stable under pre- and postcomposition with isomorphisms. -/
abbrev RespectsIso (P : MorphismProperty C) : Prop := P.Respects (isomorphisms C)
lemma RespectsIso.mk (P : MorphismProperty C)
(hprecomp : ∀ {X Y Z : C} (e : X ≅ Y) (f : Y ⟶ Z) (_ : P f), P (e.hom ≫ f))
(hpostcomp : ∀ {X Y Z : C} (e : Y ≅ Z) (f : X ⟶ Y) (_ : P f), P (f ≫ e.hom)) :
P.RespectsIso where
precomp e (_ : IsIso e) f hf := hprecomp (asIso e) f hf
postcomp e (_ : IsIso e) f hf := hpostcomp (asIso e) f hf
lemma RespectsIso.precomp (P : MorphismProperty C) [P.RespectsIso] {X Y Z : C} (e : X ⟶ Y)
[IsIso e] (f : Y ⟶ Z) (hf : P f) : P (e ≫ f) :=
RespectsLeft.precomp (Q := isomorphisms C) e ‹IsIso e› f hf
instance : RespectsIso (⊤ : MorphismProperty C) where
precomp _ _ _ _ := trivial
postcomp _ _ _ _ := trivial
lemma RespectsIso.postcomp (P : MorphismProperty C) [P.RespectsIso] {X Y Z : C} (e : Y ⟶ Z)
[IsIso e] (f : X ⟶ Y) (hf : P f) : P (f ≫ e) :=
RespectsRight.postcomp (Q := isomorphisms C) e ‹IsIso e› f hf
instance RespectsIso.op (P : MorphismProperty C) [RespectsIso P] : RespectsIso P.op where
precomp e (_ : IsIso e) f hf := postcomp P e.unop f.unop hf
postcomp e (_ : IsIso e) f hf := precomp P e.unop f.unop hf
instance RespectsIso.unop (P : MorphismProperty Cᵒᵖ) [RespectsIso P] : RespectsIso P.unop where
precomp e (_ : IsIso e) f hf := postcomp P e.op f.op hf
postcomp e (_ : IsIso e) f hf := precomp P e.op f.op hf
/-- The closure by isomorphisms of a `MorphismProperty` -/
def isoClosure (P : MorphismProperty C) : MorphismProperty C :=
fun _ _ f => ∃ (Y₁ Y₂ : C) (f' : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) (_ : P f'), Nonempty (Arrow.mk f' ≅ Arrow.mk f)
lemma le_isoClosure (P : MorphismProperty C) : P ≤ P.isoClosure :=
fun _ _ f hf => ⟨_, _, f, hf, ⟨Iso.refl _⟩⟩
instance isoClosure_respectsIso (P : MorphismProperty C) :
RespectsIso P.isoClosure where
precomp := fun e (he : IsIso e) f ⟨_, _, f', hf', ⟨iso⟩⟩ => ⟨_, _, f', hf',
⟨Arrow.isoMk (asIso iso.hom.left ≪≫ asIso (inv e)) (asIso iso.hom.right) (by simp)⟩⟩
postcomp := fun e (he : IsIso e) f ⟨_, _, f', hf', ⟨iso⟩⟩ => ⟨_, _, f', hf',
⟨Arrow.isoMk (asIso iso.hom.left) (asIso iso.hom.right ≪≫ asIso e) (by simp)⟩⟩
lemma monotone_isoClosure : Monotone (isoClosure (C := C)) := by
intro P Q h X Y f ⟨X', Y', f', hf', ⟨e⟩⟩
exact ⟨X', Y', f', h _ hf', ⟨e⟩⟩
theorem cancel_left_of_respectsIso (P : MorphismProperty C) [hP : RespectsIso P] {X Y Z : C}
(f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] : P (f ≫ g) ↔ P g :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using RespectsIso.precomp P (inv f) (f ≫ g) h, RespectsIso.precomp P f g⟩
theorem cancel_right_of_respectsIso (P : MorphismProperty C) [hP : RespectsIso P] {X Y Z : C}
(f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso g] : P (f ≫ g) ↔ P f :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using RespectsIso.postcomp P (inv g) (f ≫ g) h, RespectsIso.postcomp P g f⟩
lemma comma_iso_iff (P : MorphismProperty C) [P.RespectsIso] {A B : Type*} [Category A] [Category B]
{L : A ⥤ C} {R : B ⥤ C} {f g : Comma L R} (e : f ≅ g) :
P f.hom ↔ P g.hom := by
simp [← Comma.inv_left_hom_right e.hom, cancel_left_of_respectsIso, cancel_right_of_respectsIso]
theorem arrow_iso_iff (P : MorphismProperty C) [RespectsIso P] {f g : Arrow C}
(e : f ≅ g) : P f.hom ↔ P g.hom :=
P.comma_iso_iff e
theorem arrow_mk_iso_iff (P : MorphismProperty C) [RespectsIso P] {W X Y Z : C}
{f : W ⟶ X} {g : Y ⟶ Z} (e : Arrow.mk f ≅ Arrow.mk g) : P f ↔ P g :=
P.arrow_iso_iff e
theorem RespectsIso.of_respects_arrow_iso (P : MorphismProperty C)
(hP : ∀ (f g : Arrow C) (_ : f ≅ g) (_ : P f.hom), P g.hom) : RespectsIso P where
precomp {X Y Z} e (he : IsIso e) f hf := by
refine hP (Arrow.mk f) (Arrow.mk (e ≫ f)) (Arrow.isoMk (asIso (inv e)) (Iso.refl _) ?_) hf
simp
postcomp {X Y Z} e (he : IsIso e) f hf := by
refine hP (Arrow.mk f) (Arrow.mk (f ≫ e)) (Arrow.isoMk (Iso.refl _) (asIso e) ?_) hf
simp
lemma isoClosure_eq_iff (P : MorphismProperty C) :
P.isoClosure = P ↔ P.RespectsIso := by
refine ⟨(· ▸ P.isoClosure_respectsIso), fun hP ↦ le_antisymm ?_ (P.le_isoClosure)⟩
intro X Y f ⟨X', Y', f', hf', ⟨e⟩⟩
exact (P.arrow_mk_iso_iff e).1 hf'
lemma isoClosure_eq_self (P : MorphismProperty C) [P.RespectsIso] :
P.isoClosure = P := by rwa [isoClosure_eq_iff]
@[simp]
lemma isoClosure_isoClosure (P : MorphismProperty C) :
P.isoClosure.isoClosure = P.isoClosure :=
P.isoClosure.isoClosure_eq_self
lemma isoClosure_le_iff (P Q : MorphismProperty C) [Q.RespectsIso] :
P.isoClosure ≤ Q ↔ P ≤ Q := by
constructor
| · exact P.le_isoClosure.trans
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/MorphismProperty/Basic.lean | 317 | 317 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.TangentCone
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm.Asymptotics
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.TVS
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.Lemmas
/-!
# The Fréchet derivative
Let `E` and `F` be normed spaces, `f : E → F`, and `f' : E →L[𝕜] F` a
continuous 𝕜-linear map, where `𝕜` is a non-discrete normed field. Then
`HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x`
says that `f` has derivative `f'` at `x`, where the domain of interest
is restricted to `s`. We also have
`HasFDerivAt f f' x := HasFDerivWithinAt f f' x univ`
Finally,
`HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x`
means that `f : E → F` has derivative `f' : E →L[𝕜] F` in the sense of strict differentiability,
i.e., `f y - f z - f'(y - z) = o(y - z)` as `y, z → x`. This notion is used in the inverse
function theorem, and is defined here only to avoid proving theorems like
`IsBoundedBilinearMap.hasFDerivAt` twice: first for `HasFDerivAt`, then for
`HasStrictFDerivAt`.
## Main results
In addition to the definition and basic properties of the derivative,
the folder `Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/` contains the usual formulas
(and existence assertions) for the derivative of
* constants
* the identity
* bounded linear maps (`Linear.lean`)
* bounded bilinear maps (`Bilinear.lean`)
* sum of two functions (`Add.lean`)
* sum of finitely many functions (`Add.lean`)
* multiplication of a function by a scalar constant (`Add.lean`)
* negative of a function (`Add.lean`)
* subtraction of two functions (`Add.lean`)
* multiplication of a function by a scalar function (`Mul.lean`)
* multiplication of two scalar functions (`Mul.lean`)
* composition of functions (the chain rule) (`Comp.lean`)
* inverse function (`Mul.lean`)
(assuming that it exists; the inverse function theorem is in `../Inverse.lean`)
For most binary operations we also define `const_op` and `op_const` theorems for the cases when
the first or second argument is a constant. This makes writing chains of `HasDerivAt`'s easier,
and they more frequently lead to the desired result.
One can also interpret the derivative of a function `f : 𝕜 → E` as an element of `E` (by identifying
a linear function from `𝕜` to `E` with its value at `1`). Results on the Fréchet derivative are
translated to this more elementary point of view on the derivative in the file `Deriv.lean`. The
derivative of polynomials is handled there, as it is naturally one-dimensional.
The simplifier is set up to prove automatically that some functions are differentiable, or
differentiable at a point (but not differentiable on a set or within a set at a point, as checking
automatically that the good domains are mapped one to the other when using composition is not
something the simplifier can easily do). This means that one can write
`example (x : ℝ) : Differentiable ℝ (fun x ↦ sin (exp (3 + x^2)) - 5 * cos x) := by simp`.
If there are divisions, one needs to supply to the simplifier proofs that the denominators do
not vanish, as in
```lean
example (x : ℝ) (h : 1 + sin x ≠ 0) : DifferentiableAt ℝ (fun x ↦ exp x / (1 + sin x)) x := by
simp [h]
```
Of course, these examples only work once `exp`, `cos` and `sin` have been shown to be
differentiable, in `Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Deriv`.
The simplifier is not set up to compute the Fréchet derivative of maps (as these are in general
complicated multidimensional linear maps), but it will compute one-dimensional derivatives,
see `Deriv.lean`.
## Implementation details
The derivative is defined in terms of the `IsLittleOTVS` relation to ensure the definition does not
ingrain a choice of norm, and is then quickly translated to the more convenient `IsLittleO` in the
subsequent theorems.
It is also characterized in terms of the `Tendsto` relation.
We also introduce predicates `DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x` (where `𝕜` is the base field,
`f` the function to be differentiated, `x` the point at which the derivative is asserted to exist,
and `s` the set along which the derivative is defined), as well as `DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x`,
`DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s` and `Differentiable 𝕜 f` to express the existence of a derivative.
To be able to compute with derivatives, we write `fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x` and `fderiv 𝕜 f x`
for some choice of a derivative if it exists, and the zero function otherwise. This choice only
behaves well along sets for which the derivative is unique, i.e., those for which the tangent
directions span a dense subset of the whole space. The predicates `UniqueDiffWithinAt s x` and
`UniqueDiffOn s`, defined in `TangentCone.lean` express this property. We prove that indeed
they imply the uniqueness of the derivative. This is satisfied for open subsets, and in particular
for `univ`. This uniqueness only holds when the field is non-discrete, which we request at the very
beginning: otherwise, a derivative can be defined, but it has no interesting properties whatsoever.
To make sure that the simplifier can prove automatically that functions are differentiable, we tag
many lemmas with the `simp` attribute, for instance those saying that the sum of differentiable
functions is differentiable, as well as their product, their cartesian product, and so on. A notable
exception is the chain rule: we do not mark as a simp lemma the fact that, if `f` and `g` are
differentiable, then their composition also is: `simp` would always be able to match this lemma,
by taking `f` or `g` to be the identity. Instead, for every reasonable function (say, `exp`),
we add a lemma that if `f` is differentiable then so is `(fun x ↦ exp (f x))`. This means adding
some boilerplate lemmas, but these can also be useful in their own right.
Tests for this ability of the simplifier (with more examples) are provided in
`Tests/Differentiable.lean`.
## TODO
Generalize more results to topological vector spaces.
## Tags
derivative, differentiable, Fréchet, calculus
-/
open Filter Asymptotics ContinuousLinearMap Set Metric Topology NNReal ENNReal
noncomputable section
section TVS
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace E]
variable {F : Type*} [AddCommGroup F] [Module 𝕜 F] [TopologicalSpace F]
/-- A function `f` has the continuous linear map `f'` as derivative along the filter `L` if
`f x' = f x + f' (x' - x) + o (x' - x)` when `x'` converges along the filter `L`. This definition
is designed to be specialized for `L = 𝓝 x` (in `HasFDerivAt`), giving rise to the usual notion
of Fréchet derivative, and for `L = 𝓝[s] x` (in `HasFDerivWithinAt`), giving rise to
the notion of Fréchet derivative along the set `s`. -/
@[mk_iff hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS]
structure HasFDerivAtFilter (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) (L : Filter E) : Prop where
of_isLittleOTVS ::
isLittleOTVS : (fun x' => f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)) =o[𝕜; L] (fun x' => x' - x)
/-- A function `f` has the continuous linear map `f'` as derivative at `x` within a set `s` if
`f x' = f x + f' (x' - x) + o (x' - x)` when `x'` tends to `x` inside `s`. -/
@[fun_prop]
def HasFDerivWithinAt (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (s : Set E) (x : E) :=
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x (𝓝[s] x)
/-- A function `f` has the continuous linear map `f'` as derivative at `x` if
`f x' = f x + f' (x' - x) + o (x' - x)` when `x'` tends to `x`. -/
@[fun_prop]
def HasFDerivAt (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) :=
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x (𝓝 x)
/-- A function `f` has derivative `f'` at `a` in the sense of *strict differentiability*
if `f x - f y - f' (x - y) = o(x - y)` as `x, y → a`. This form of differentiability is required,
e.g., by the inverse function theorem. Any `C^1` function on a vector space over `ℝ` is strictly
differentiable but this definition works, e.g., for vector spaces over `p`-adic numbers. -/
@[fun_prop, mk_iff hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleOTVS]
structure HasStrictFDerivAt (f : E → F) (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (x : E) where
of_isLittleOTVS ::
isLittleOTVS :
(fun p : E × E => f p.1 - f p.2 - f' (p.1 - p.2))
=o[𝕜; 𝓝 (x, x)] (fun p : E × E => p.1 - p.2)
variable (𝕜)
/-- A function `f` is differentiable at a point `x` within a set `s` if it admits a derivative
there (possibly non-unique). -/
@[fun_prop]
def DifferentiableWithinAt (f : E → F) (s : Set E) (x : E) :=
∃ f' : E →L[𝕜] F, HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x
/-- A function `f` is differentiable at a point `x` if it admits a derivative there (possibly
non-unique). -/
@[fun_prop]
def DifferentiableAt (f : E → F) (x : E) :=
∃ f' : E →L[𝕜] F, HasFDerivAt f f' x
open scoped Classical in
/-- If `f` has a derivative at `x` within `s`, then `fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x` is such a derivative.
Otherwise, it is set to `0`. We also set it to be zero, if zero is one of possible derivatives. -/
irreducible_def fderivWithin (f : E → F) (s : Set E) (x : E) : E →L[𝕜] F :=
if HasFDerivWithinAt f (0 : E →L[𝕜] F) s x
then 0
else if h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x
then Classical.choose h
else 0
/-- If `f` has a derivative at `x`, then `fderiv 𝕜 f x` is such a derivative. Otherwise, it is
set to `0`. -/
irreducible_def fderiv (f : E → F) (x : E) : E →L[𝕜] F :=
fderivWithin 𝕜 f univ x
/-- `DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s` means that `f` is differentiable within `s` at any point of `s`. -/
@[fun_prop]
def DifferentiableOn (f : E → F) (s : Set E) :=
∀ x ∈ s, DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x
/-- `Differentiable 𝕜 f` means that `f` is differentiable at any point. -/
@[fun_prop]
def Differentiable (f : E → F) :=
∀ x, DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x
variable {𝕜}
variable {f f₀ f₁ g : E → F}
variable {f' f₀' f₁' g' : E →L[𝕜] F}
variable {x : E}
variable {s t : Set E}
variable {L L₁ L₂ : Filter E}
theorem fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt (h : ¬DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x = 0 := by
simp [fderivWithin, h]
@[simp]
theorem fderivWithin_univ : fderivWithin 𝕜 f univ = fderiv 𝕜 f := by
ext
rw [fderiv]
end TVS
section
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {f f₀ f₁ g : E → F}
variable {f' f₀' f₁' g' : E →L[𝕜] F}
variable {x : E}
variable {s t : Set E}
variable {L L₁ L₂ : Filter E}
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L ↔ (fun x' => f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)) =o[L] fun x' => x' - x :=
(hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS ..).trans isLittleOTVS_iff_isLittleO
alias ⟨HasFDerivAtFilter.isLittleO, HasFDerivAtFilter.of_isLittleO⟩ :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO :
HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x ↔
(fun p : E × E => f p.1 - f p.2 - f' (p.1 - p.2)) =o[𝓝 (x, x)] fun p : E × E => p.1 - p.2 :=
(hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleOTVS ..).trans isLittleOTVS_iff_isLittleO
alias ⟨HasStrictFDerivAt.isLittleO, HasStrictFDerivAt.of_isLittleO⟩ :=
hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO
section DerivativeUniqueness
/- In this section, we discuss the uniqueness of the derivative.
We prove that the definitions `UniqueDiffWithinAt` and `UniqueDiffOn` indeed imply the
uniqueness of the derivative. -/
/-- If a function f has a derivative f' at x, a rescaled version of f around x converges to f',
i.e., `n (f (x + (1/n) v) - f x)` converges to `f' v`. More generally, if `c n` tends to infinity
and `c n * d n` tends to `v`, then `c n * (f (x + d n) - f x)` tends to `f' v`. This lemma expresses
this fact, for functions having a derivative within a set. Its specific formulation is useful for
tangent cone related discussions. -/
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.lim (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) {α : Type*} (l : Filter α)
{c : α → 𝕜} {d : α → E} {v : E} (dtop : ∀ᶠ n in l, x + d n ∈ s)
(clim : Tendsto (fun n => ‖c n‖) l atTop) (cdlim : Tendsto (fun n => c n • d n) l (𝓝 v)) :
Tendsto (fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x)) l (𝓝 (f' v)) := by
have tendsto_arg : Tendsto (fun n => x + d n) l (𝓝[s] x) := by
conv in 𝓝[s] x => rw [← add_zero x]
rw [nhdsWithin, tendsto_inf]
constructor
· apply tendsto_const_nhds.add (tangentConeAt.lim_zero l clim cdlim)
· rwa [tendsto_principal]
have : (fun y => f y - f x - f' (y - x)) =o[𝓝[s] x] fun y => y - x := h.isLittleO
have : (fun n => f (x + d n) - f x - f' (x + d n - x)) =o[l] fun n => x + d n - x :=
this.comp_tendsto tendsto_arg
have : (fun n => f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n)) =o[l] d := by simpa only [add_sub_cancel_left]
have : (fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n))) =o[l] fun n => c n • d n :=
(isBigO_refl c l).smul_isLittleO this
have : (fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n))) =o[l] fun _ => (1 : ℝ) :=
this.trans_isBigO (cdlim.isBigO_one ℝ)
have L1 : Tendsto (fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n))) l (𝓝 0) :=
(isLittleO_one_iff ℝ).1 this
have L2 : Tendsto (fun n => f' (c n • d n)) l (𝓝 (f' v)) :=
Tendsto.comp f'.cont.continuousAt cdlim
have L3 :
Tendsto (fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n)) + f' (c n • d n)) l (𝓝 (0 + f' v)) :=
L1.add L2
have :
(fun n => c n • (f (x + d n) - f x - f' (d n)) + f' (c n • d n)) = fun n =>
c n • (f (x + d n) - f x) := by
ext n
simp [smul_add, smul_sub]
rwa [this, zero_add] at L3
/-- If `f'` and `f₁'` are two derivatives of `f` within `s` at `x`, then they are equal on the
tangent cone to `s` at `x` -/
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.unique_on (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hg : HasFDerivWithinAt f f₁' s x) : EqOn f' f₁' (tangentConeAt 𝕜 s x) :=
fun _ ⟨_, _, dtop, clim, cdlim⟩ =>
tendsto_nhds_unique (hf.lim atTop dtop clim cdlim) (hg.lim atTop dtop clim cdlim)
/-- `UniqueDiffWithinAt` achieves its goal: it implies the uniqueness of the derivative. -/
theorem UniqueDiffWithinAt.eq (H : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hg : HasFDerivWithinAt f f₁' s x) : f' = f₁' :=
ContinuousLinearMap.ext_on H.1 (hf.unique_on hg)
theorem UniqueDiffOn.eq (H : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(h₁ : HasFDerivWithinAt f f₁' s x) : f' = f₁' :=
(H x hx).eq h h₁
end DerivativeUniqueness
section FDerivProperties
/-! ### Basic properties of the derivative -/
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L ↔
Tendsto (fun x' => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)‖) L (𝓝 0) := by
have h : ∀ x', ‖x' - x‖ = 0 → ‖f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)‖ = 0 := fun x' hx' => by
rw [sub_eq_zero.1 (norm_eq_zero.1 hx')]
simp
rw [hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO, ← isLittleO_norm_left, ← isLittleO_norm_right,
isLittleO_iff_tendsto h]
exact tendsto_congr fun _ => div_eq_inv_mul _ _
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_iff_tendsto :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔
Tendsto (fun x' => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)‖) (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝 0) :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto
theorem hasFDerivAt_iff_tendsto :
HasFDerivAt f f' x ↔ Tendsto (fun x' => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - f' (x' - x)‖) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 0) :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto
theorem hasFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO_nhds_zero :
HasFDerivAt f f' x ↔ (fun h : E => f (x + h) - f x - f' h) =o[𝓝 0] fun h => h := by
rw [HasFDerivAt, hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO, ← map_add_left_nhds_zero x, isLittleO_map]
simp [Function.comp_def]
nonrec theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.mono (h : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L₂) (hst : L₁ ≤ L₂) :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L₁ :=
.of_isLittleOTVS <| h.isLittleOTVS.mono hst
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
(h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' t x) (hst : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
h.mono <| nhdsWithin_le_iff.mpr hst
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")]
alias HasFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem := HasFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
nonrec theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.mono (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' t x) (hst : s ⊆ t) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
h.mono <| nhdsWithin_mono _ hst
theorem HasFDerivAt.hasFDerivAtFilter (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (hL : L ≤ 𝓝 x) :
HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L :=
h.mono hL
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.hasFDerivWithinAt (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
h.hasFDerivAtFilter inf_le_left
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
⟨f', h⟩
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.differentiableAt (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
⟨f', h⟩
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_univ : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' univ x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x := by
simp only [HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_univ, HasFDerivAt]
alias ⟨HasFDerivWithinAt.hasFDerivAt_of_univ, _⟩ := hasFDerivWithinAt_univ
theorem differentiableWithinAt_univ :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f univ x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x := by
simp only [DifferentiableWithinAt, hasFDerivWithinAt_univ, DifferentiableAt]
theorem fderiv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt (h : ¬DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) : fderiv 𝕜 f x = 0 := by
rw [fderiv, fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt]
rwa [differentiableWithinAt_univ]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_of_mem_nhds (h : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x := by
rw [HasFDerivAt, HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_eq_nhds.mpr h]
lemma hasFDerivWithinAt_of_isOpen (h : IsOpen s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_of_mem_nhds (h.mem_nhds hx)
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_insert {y : E} :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' (insert y s) x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | h)
· simp_rw [HasFDerivWithinAt, hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS]
apply isLittleOTVS_insert
simp only [sub_self, map_zero]
refine ⟨fun h => h.mono <| subset_insert y s, fun hf => hf.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin ?_⟩
simp_rw [nhdsWithin_insert_of_ne h, self_mem_nhdsWithin]
alias ⟨HasFDerivWithinAt.of_insert, HasFDerivWithinAt.insert'⟩ := hasFDerivWithinAt_insert
protected theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.insert (h : HasFDerivWithinAt g g' s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt g g' (insert x s) x :=
h.insert'
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_diff_singleton (y : E) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' (s \ {y}) x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
rw [← hasFDerivWithinAt_insert, insert_diff_singleton, hasFDerivWithinAt_insert]
@[simp]
protected theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.empty : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' ∅ x := by
simp [HasFDerivWithinAt, hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS]
@[simp]
protected theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.empty : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f ∅ x :=
⟨0, .empty⟩
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.of_finite (h : s.Finite) : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
induction s, h using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => exact .empty
| insert _ _ ih => exact ih.insert'
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.of_finite (h : s.Finite) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
⟨0, .of_finite h⟩
@[simp]
protected theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.singleton {y} : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' {x} y :=
.of_finite <| finite_singleton _
@[simp]
protected theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.singleton {y} : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f {x} y :=
⟨0, .singleton⟩
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.of_subsingleton (h : s.Subsingleton) : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
.of_finite h.finite
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.of_subsingleton (h : s.Subsingleton) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
.of_finite h.finite
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.isBigO_sub (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
(fun p : E × E => f p.1 - f p.2) =O[𝓝 (x, x)] fun p : E × E => p.1 - p.2 :=
hf.isLittleO.isBigO.congr_of_sub.2 (f'.isBigO_comp _ _)
theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.isBigO_sub (h : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L) :
(fun x' => f x' - f x) =O[L] fun x' => x' - x :=
h.isLittleO.isBigO.congr_of_sub.2 (f'.isBigO_sub _ _)
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.hasFDerivAt (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
HasFDerivAt f f' x :=
.of_isLittleOTVS <| by
simpa only using hf.isLittleOTVS.comp_tendsto (tendsto_id.prodMk_nhds tendsto_const_nhds)
protected theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.differentiableAt (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
hf.hasFDerivAt.differentiableAt
/-- If `f` is strictly differentiable at `x` with derivative `f'` and `K > ‖f'‖₊`, then `f` is
`K`-Lipschitz in a neighborhood of `x`. -/
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.exists_lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_lt (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x)
(K : ℝ≥0) (hK : ‖f'‖₊ < K) : ∃ s ∈ 𝓝 x, LipschitzOnWith K f s := by
have := hf.isLittleO.add_isBigOWith (f'.isBigOWith_comp _ _) hK
simp only [sub_add_cancel, IsBigOWith] at this
rcases exists_nhds_square this with ⟨U, Uo, xU, hU⟩
exact
⟨U, Uo.mem_nhds xU, lipschitzOnWith_iff_norm_sub_le.2 fun x hx y hy => hU (mk_mem_prod hx hy)⟩
/-- If `f` is strictly differentiable at `x` with derivative `f'`, then `f` is Lipschitz in a
neighborhood of `x`. See also `HasStrictFDerivAt.exists_lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_lt` for a
more precise statement. -/
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.exists_lipschitzOnWith (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
∃ K, ∃ s ∈ 𝓝 x, LipschitzOnWith K f s :=
(exists_gt _).imp hf.exists_lipschitzOnWith_of_nnnorm_lt
/-- Directional derivative agrees with `HasFDeriv`. -/
theorem HasFDerivAt.lim (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (v : E) {α : Type*} {c : α → 𝕜} {l : Filter α}
(hc : Tendsto (fun n => ‖c n‖) l atTop) :
Tendsto (fun n => c n • (f (x + (c n)⁻¹ • v) - f x)) l (𝓝 (f' v)) := by
refine (hasFDerivWithinAt_univ.2 hf).lim _ univ_mem hc ?_
intro U hU
refine (eventually_ne_of_tendsto_norm_atTop hc (0 : 𝕜)).mono fun y hy => ?_
convert mem_of_mem_nhds hU
dsimp only
rw [← mul_smul, mul_inv_cancel₀ hy, one_smul]
theorem HasFDerivAt.unique (h₀ : HasFDerivAt f f₀' x) (h₁ : HasFDerivAt f f₁' x) : f₀' = f₁' := by
rw [← hasFDerivWithinAt_univ] at h₀ h₁
exact uniqueDiffWithinAt_univ.eq h₀ h₁
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_inter' (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' (s ∩ t) x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
simp [HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_restrict'' s h]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_inter (h : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' (s ∩ t) x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
simp [HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_restrict' s h]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.union (hs : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(ht : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' t x) : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' (s ∪ t) x := by
simp only [HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_union]
exact .of_isLittleOTVS <| hs.isLittleOTVS.sup ht.isLittleOTVS
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.hasFDerivAt (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasFDerivAt f f' x := by
rwa [← univ_inter s, hasFDerivWithinAt_inter hs, hasFDerivWithinAt_univ] at h
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.differentiableAt (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x)
(hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
h.imp fun _ hf' => hf'.hasFDerivAt hs
/-- If `x` is isolated in `s`, then `f` has any derivative at `x` within `s`,
as this statement is empty. -/
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.of_not_accPt (h : ¬AccPt x (𝓟 s)) : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
rw [accPt_principal_iff_nhdsWithin, not_neBot] at h
rw [← hasFDerivWithinAt_diff_singleton x, HasFDerivWithinAt, h,
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS]
exact .bot
/-- If `x` is isolated in `s`, then `f` has any derivative at `x` within `s`,
as this statement is empty. -/
@[deprecated HasFDerivWithinAt.of_not_accPt (since := "2025-04-20")]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.of_nhdsWithin_eq_bot (h : 𝓝[s \ {x}] x = ⊥) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
.of_not_accPt <| by rwa [accPt_principal_iff_nhdsWithin, not_neBot]
| /-- If `x` is not in the closure of `s`, then `f` has any derivative at `x` within `s`,
as this statement is empty. -/
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.of_not_mem_closure (h : x ∉ closure s) : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
.of_not_accPt (h ·.clusterPt.mem_closure)
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Basic.lean | 531 | 534 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.FilterProduct
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
/-!
# Construction of the hyperreal numbers as an ultraproduct of real sequences.
-/
open Filter Germ Topology
/-- Hyperreal numbers on the ultrafilter extending the cofinite filter -/
def Hyperreal : Type :=
Germ (hyperfilter ℕ : Filter ℕ) ℝ deriving Inhabited
namespace Hyperreal
@[inherit_doc] notation "ℝ*" => Hyperreal
noncomputable instance : Field ℝ* :=
inferInstanceAs (Field (Germ _ _))
noncomputable instance : LinearOrder ℝ* :=
inferInstanceAs (LinearOrder (Germ _ _))
instance : IsStrictOrderedRing ℝ* :=
inferInstanceAs (IsStrictOrderedRing (Germ _ _))
/-- Natural embedding `ℝ → ℝ*`. -/
@[coe] def ofReal : ℝ → ℝ* := const
noncomputable instance : CoeTC ℝ ℝ* := ⟨ofReal⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_coe {x y : ℝ} : (x : ℝ*) = y ↔ x = y :=
Germ.const_inj
theorem coe_ne_coe {x y : ℝ} : (x : ℝ*) ≠ y ↔ x ≠ y :=
coe_eq_coe.not
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_zero {x : ℝ} : (x : ℝ*) = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
coe_eq_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_one {x : ℝ} : (x : ℝ*) = 1 ↔ x = 1 :=
coe_eq_coe
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_ne_zero {x : ℝ} : (x : ℝ*) ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
coe_ne_coe
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_ne_one {x : ℝ} : (x : ℝ*) ≠ 1 ↔ x ≠ 1 :=
coe_ne_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_one : ↑(1 : ℝ) = (1 : ℝ*) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ) = (0 : ℝ*) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inv (x : ℝ) : ↑x⁻¹ = (x⁻¹ : ℝ*) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_neg (x : ℝ) : ↑(-x) = (-x : ℝ*) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x + y) = (x + y : ℝ*) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
((ofNat(n) : ℝ) : ℝ*) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x * y) = (x * y : ℝ*) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_div (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x / y) = (x / y : ℝ*) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x - y) = (x - y : ℝ*) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_le_coe {x y : ℝ} : (x : ℝ*) ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y :=
Germ.const_le_iff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_lt_coe {x y : ℝ} : (x : ℝ*) < y ↔ x < y :=
Germ.const_lt_iff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nonneg {x : ℝ} : 0 ≤ (x : ℝ*) ↔ 0 ≤ x :=
coe_le_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_pos {x : ℝ} : 0 < (x : ℝ*) ↔ 0 < x :=
coe_lt_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_abs (x : ℝ) : ((|x| : ℝ) : ℝ*) = |↑x| :=
const_abs x
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_max (x y : ℝ) : ((max x y : ℝ) : ℝ*) = max ↑x ↑y :=
Germ.const_max _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_min (x y : ℝ) : ((min x y : ℝ) : ℝ*) = min ↑x ↑y :=
Germ.const_min _ _
/-- Construct a hyperreal number from a sequence of real numbers. -/
def ofSeq (f : ℕ → ℝ) : ℝ* := (↑f : Germ (hyperfilter ℕ : Filter ℕ) ℝ)
theorem ofSeq_surjective : Function.Surjective ofSeq := Quot.exists_rep
theorem ofSeq_lt_ofSeq {f g : ℕ → ℝ} : ofSeq f < ofSeq g ↔ ∀ᶠ n in hyperfilter ℕ, f n < g n :=
Germ.coe_lt
/-- A sample infinitesimal hyperreal -/
noncomputable def epsilon : ℝ* :=
ofSeq fun n => n⁻¹
/-- A sample infinite hyperreal -/
noncomputable def omega : ℝ* := ofSeq Nat.cast
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "ε" => Hyperreal.epsilon
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "ω" => Hyperreal.omega
@[simp]
theorem inv_omega : ω⁻¹ = ε :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem inv_epsilon : ε⁻¹ = ω :=
@inv_inv _ _ ω
theorem omega_pos : 0 < ω :=
Germ.coe_pos.2 <| Nat.hyperfilter_le_atTop <| (eventually_gt_atTop 0).mono fun _ ↦
Nat.cast_pos.2
theorem epsilon_pos : 0 < ε :=
inv_pos_of_pos omega_pos
theorem epsilon_ne_zero : ε ≠ 0 :=
epsilon_pos.ne'
theorem omega_ne_zero : ω ≠ 0 :=
omega_pos.ne'
theorem epsilon_mul_omega : ε * ω = 1 :=
@inv_mul_cancel₀ _ _ ω omega_ne_zero
theorem lt_of_tendsto_zero_of_pos {f : ℕ → ℝ} (hf : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 0)) :
∀ {r : ℝ}, 0 < r → ofSeq f < (r : ℝ*) := fun hr ↦
ofSeq_lt_ofSeq.2 <| (hf.eventually <| gt_mem_nhds hr).filter_mono Nat.hyperfilter_le_atTop
theorem neg_lt_of_tendsto_zero_of_pos {f : ℕ → ℝ} (hf : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 0)) :
∀ {r : ℝ}, 0 < r → (-r : ℝ*) < ofSeq f := fun hr =>
have hg := hf.neg
neg_lt_of_neg_lt (by rw [neg_zero] at hg; exact lt_of_tendsto_zero_of_pos hg hr)
theorem gt_of_tendsto_zero_of_neg {f : ℕ → ℝ} (hf : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 0)) :
∀ {r : ℝ}, r < 0 → (r : ℝ*) < ofSeq f := fun {r} hr => by
rw [← neg_neg r, coe_neg]; exact neg_lt_of_tendsto_zero_of_pos hf (neg_pos.mpr hr)
theorem epsilon_lt_pos (x : ℝ) : 0 < x → ε < x :=
lt_of_tendsto_zero_of_pos tendsto_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
/-- Standard part predicate -/
def IsSt (x : ℝ*) (r : ℝ) :=
∀ δ : ℝ, 0 < δ → (r - δ : ℝ*) < x ∧ x < r + δ
open scoped Classical in
/-- Standard part function: like a "round" to ℝ instead of ℤ -/
noncomputable def st : ℝ* → ℝ := fun x => if h : ∃ r, IsSt x r then Classical.choose h else 0
/-- A hyperreal number is infinitesimal if its standard part is 0 -/
def Infinitesimal (x : ℝ*) :=
IsSt x 0
/-- A hyperreal number is positive infinite if it is larger than all real numbers -/
def InfinitePos (x : ℝ*) :=
∀ r : ℝ, ↑r < x
/-- A hyperreal number is negative infinite if it is smaller than all real numbers -/
def InfiniteNeg (x : ℝ*) :=
∀ r : ℝ, x < r
/-- A hyperreal number is infinite if it is infinite positive or infinite negative -/
def Infinite (x : ℝ*) :=
InfinitePos x ∨ InfiniteNeg x
/-!
### Some facts about `st`
-/
theorem isSt_ofSeq_iff_tendsto {f : ℕ → ℝ} {r : ℝ} :
IsSt (ofSeq f) r ↔ Tendsto f (hyperfilter ℕ) (𝓝 r) :=
Iff.trans (forall₂_congr fun _ _ ↦ (ofSeq_lt_ofSeq.and ofSeq_lt_ofSeq).trans eventually_and.symm)
(nhds_basis_Ioo_pos _).tendsto_right_iff.symm
theorem isSt_iff_tendsto {x : ℝ*} {r : ℝ} : IsSt x r ↔ x.Tendsto (𝓝 r) := by
rcases ofSeq_surjective x with ⟨f, rfl⟩
exact isSt_ofSeq_iff_tendsto
theorem isSt_of_tendsto {f : ℕ → ℝ} {r : ℝ} (hf : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 r)) : IsSt (ofSeq f) r :=
isSt_ofSeq_iff_tendsto.2 <| hf.mono_left Nat.hyperfilter_le_atTop
protected theorem IsSt.lt {x y : ℝ*} {r s : ℝ} (hxr : IsSt x r) (hys : IsSt y s) (hrs : r < s) :
x < y := by
rcases ofSeq_surjective x with ⟨f, rfl⟩
rcases ofSeq_surjective y with ⟨g, rfl⟩
rw [isSt_ofSeq_iff_tendsto] at hxr hys
exact ofSeq_lt_ofSeq.2 <| hxr.eventually_lt hys hrs
theorem IsSt.unique {x : ℝ*} {r s : ℝ} (hr : IsSt x r) (hs : IsSt x s) : r = s := by
rcases ofSeq_surjective x with ⟨f, rfl⟩
rw [isSt_ofSeq_iff_tendsto] at hr hs
exact tendsto_nhds_unique hr hs
theorem IsSt.st_eq {x : ℝ*} {r : ℝ} (hxr : IsSt x r) : st x = r := by
have h : ∃ r, IsSt x r := ⟨r, hxr⟩
rw [st, dif_pos h]
exact (Classical.choose_spec h).unique hxr
theorem IsSt.not_infinite {x : ℝ*} {r : ℝ} (h : IsSt x r) : ¬Infinite x := fun hi ↦
hi.elim (fun hp ↦ lt_asymm (h 1 one_pos).2 (hp (r + 1))) fun hn ↦
lt_asymm (h 1 one_pos).1 (hn (r - 1))
theorem not_infinite_of_exists_st {x : ℝ*} : (∃ r : ℝ, IsSt x r) → ¬Infinite x := fun ⟨_r, hr⟩ =>
hr.not_infinite
theorem Infinite.st_eq {x : ℝ*} (hi : Infinite x) : st x = 0 :=
dif_neg fun ⟨_r, hr⟩ ↦ hr.not_infinite hi
theorem isSt_sSup {x : ℝ*} (hni : ¬Infinite x) : IsSt x (sSup { y : ℝ | (y : ℝ*) < x }) :=
let S : Set ℝ := { y : ℝ | (y : ℝ*) < x }
let R : ℝ := sSup S
let ⟨r₁, hr₁⟩ := not_forall.mp (not_or.mp hni).2
let ⟨r₂, hr₂⟩ := not_forall.mp (not_or.mp hni).1
have HR₁ : S.Nonempty :=
⟨r₁ - 1, lt_of_lt_of_le (coe_lt_coe.2 <| sub_one_lt _) (not_lt.mp hr₁)⟩
have HR₂ : BddAbove S :=
⟨r₂, fun _y hy => le_of_lt (coe_lt_coe.1 (lt_of_lt_of_le hy (not_lt.mp hr₂)))⟩
fun δ hδ =>
⟨lt_of_not_le fun c =>
have hc : ∀ y ∈ S, y ≤ R - δ := fun _y hy =>
coe_le_coe.1 <| le_of_lt <| lt_of_lt_of_le hy c
not_lt_of_le (csSup_le HR₁ hc) <| sub_lt_self R hδ,
lt_of_not_le fun c =>
have hc : ↑(R + δ / 2) < x :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (add_lt_add_left (coe_lt_coe.2 (half_lt_self hδ)) R) c
| not_lt_of_le (le_csSup HR₂ hc) <| (lt_add_iff_pos_right _).mpr <| half_pos hδ⟩
theorem exists_st_of_not_infinite {x : ℝ*} (hni : ¬Infinite x) : ∃ r : ℝ, IsSt x r :=
⟨sSup { y : ℝ | (y : ℝ*) < x }, isSt_sSup hni⟩
theorem st_eq_sSup {x : ℝ*} : st x = sSup { y : ℝ | (y : ℝ*) < x } := by
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Hyperreal.lean | 268 | 273 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Bool.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.FunLike.Equiv
import Mathlib.Data.Quot
import Mathlib.Data.Subtype
import Mathlib.Logic.Unique
import Mathlib.Tactic.Conv
import Mathlib.Tactic.Simps.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Substs
/-!
# Equivalence between types
In this file we define two types:
* `Equiv α β` a.k.a. `α ≃ β`: a bijective map `α → β` bundled with its inverse map; we use this (and
not equality!) to express that various `Type`s or `Sort`s are equivalent.
* `Equiv.Perm α`: the group of permutations `α ≃ α`. More lemmas about `Equiv.Perm` can be found in
`Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm`.
Then we define
* canonical isomorphisms between various types: e.g.,
- `Equiv.refl α` is the identity map interpreted as `α ≃ α`;
* operations on equivalences: e.g.,
- `Equiv.symm e : β ≃ α` is the inverse of `e : α ≃ β`;
- `Equiv.trans e₁ e₂ : α ≃ γ` is the composition of `e₁ : α ≃ β` and `e₂ : β ≃ γ` (note the order
of the arguments!);
* definitions that transfer some instances along an equivalence. By convention, we transfer
instances from right to left.
- `Equiv.inhabited` takes `e : α ≃ β` and `[Inhabited β]` and returns `Inhabited α`;
- `Equiv.unique` takes `e : α ≃ β` and `[Unique β]` and returns `Unique α`;
- `Equiv.decidableEq` takes `e : α ≃ β` and `[DecidableEq β]` and returns `DecidableEq α`.
More definitions of this kind can be found in other files.
E.g., `Mathlib.Algebra.Equiv.TransferInstance` does it for many algebraic type classes like
`Group`, `Module`, etc.
Many more such isomorphisms and operations are defined in `Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Basic`.
## Tags
equivalence, congruence, bijective map
-/
open Function
universe u v w z
variable {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} {γ : Sort w}
/-- `α ≃ β` is the type of functions from `α → β` with a two-sided inverse. -/
structure Equiv (α : Sort*) (β : Sort _) where
protected toFun : α → β
protected invFun : β → α
protected left_inv : LeftInverse invFun toFun
protected right_inv : RightInverse invFun toFun
@[inherit_doc]
infixl:25 " ≃ " => Equiv
/-- Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `EquivLike F α β` into an actual
`Equiv`. This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `α ≃ β`. -/
@[coe]
def EquivLike.toEquiv {F} [EquivLike F α β] (f : F) : α ≃ β where
toFun := f
invFun := EquivLike.inv f
left_inv := EquivLike.left_inv f
right_inv := EquivLike.right_inv f
/-- Any type satisfying `EquivLike` can be cast into `Equiv` via `EquivLike.toEquiv`. -/
instance {F} [EquivLike F α β] : CoeTC F (α ≃ β) :=
⟨EquivLike.toEquiv⟩
/-- `Perm α` is the type of bijections from `α` to itself. -/
abbrev Equiv.Perm (α : Sort*) :=
Equiv α α
namespace Equiv
instance : EquivLike (α ≃ β) α β where
coe := Equiv.toFun
inv := Equiv.invFun
left_inv := Equiv.left_inv
right_inv := Equiv.right_inv
coe_injective' e₁ e₂ h₁ h₂ := by cases e₁; cases e₂; congr
/-- Helper instance when inference gets stuck on following the normal chain
`EquivLike → FunLike`.
TODO: this instance doesn't appear to be necessary: remove it (after benchmarking?)
-/
instance : FunLike (α ≃ β) α β where
coe := Equiv.toFun
coe_injective' := DFunLike.coe_injective
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma _root_.EquivLike.coe_coe {F} [EquivLike F α β] (e : F) :
((e : α ≃ β) : α → β) = e := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_fn_mk (f : α → β) (g l r) : (Equiv.mk f g l r : α → β) = f :=
rfl
/-- The map `(r ≃ s) → (r → s)` is injective. -/
theorem coe_fn_injective : @Function.Injective (α ≃ β) (α → β) (fun e => e) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective'
protected theorem coe_inj {e₁ e₂ : α ≃ β} : (e₁ : α → β) = e₂ ↔ e₁ = e₂ :=
@DFunLike.coe_fn_eq _ _ _ _ e₁ e₂
@[ext] theorem ext {f g : Equiv α β} (H : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g := DFunLike.ext f g H
protected theorem congr_arg {f : Equiv α β} {x x' : α} : x = x' → f x = f x' :=
DFunLike.congr_arg f
protected theorem congr_fun {f g : Equiv α β} (h : f = g) (x : α) : f x = g x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun h x
@[ext] theorem Perm.ext {σ τ : Equiv.Perm α} (H : ∀ x, σ x = τ x) : σ = τ := Equiv.ext H
protected theorem Perm.congr_arg {f : Equiv.Perm α} {x x' : α} : x = x' → f x = f x' :=
Equiv.congr_arg
protected theorem Perm.congr_fun {f g : Equiv.Perm α} (h : f = g) (x : α) : f x = g x :=
Equiv.congr_fun h x
/-- Any type is equivalent to itself. -/
@[refl] protected def refl (α : Sort*) : α ≃ α := ⟨id, id, fun _ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
instance inhabited' : Inhabited (α ≃ α) := ⟨Equiv.refl α⟩
/-- Inverse of an equivalence `e : α ≃ β`. -/
@[symm]
protected def symm (e : α ≃ β) : β ≃ α := ⟨e.invFun, e.toFun, e.right_inv, e.left_inv⟩
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def Simps.symm_apply (e : α ≃ β) : β → α := e.symm
initialize_simps_projections Equiv (toFun → apply, invFun → symm_apply)
/-- Restatement of `Equiv.left_inv` in terms of `Function.LeftInverse`. -/
theorem left_inv' (e : α ≃ β) : Function.LeftInverse e.symm e := e.left_inv
/-- Restatement of `Equiv.right_inv` in terms of `Function.RightInverse`. -/
theorem right_inv' (e : α ≃ β) : Function.RightInverse e.symm e := e.right_inv
/-- Composition of equivalences `e₁ : α ≃ β` and `e₂ : β ≃ γ`. -/
@[trans]
protected def trans (e₁ : α ≃ β) (e₂ : β ≃ γ) : α ≃ γ :=
⟨e₂ ∘ e₁, e₁.symm ∘ e₂.symm, e₂.left_inv.comp e₁.left_inv, e₂.right_inv.comp e₁.right_inv⟩
@[simps]
instance : Trans Equiv Equiv Equiv where
trans := Equiv.trans
@[simp, mfld_simps] theorem toFun_as_coe (e : α ≃ β) : e.toFun = e := rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps] theorem invFun_as_coe (e : α ≃ β) : e.invFun = e.symm := rfl
protected theorem injective (e : α ≃ β) : Injective e := EquivLike.injective e
protected theorem surjective (e : α ≃ β) : Surjective e := EquivLike.surjective e
protected theorem bijective (e : α ≃ β) : Bijective e := EquivLike.bijective e
protected theorem subsingleton (e : α ≃ β) [Subsingleton β] : Subsingleton α :=
e.injective.subsingleton
protected theorem subsingleton.symm (e : α ≃ β) [Subsingleton α] : Subsingleton β :=
e.symm.injective.subsingleton
theorem subsingleton_congr (e : α ≃ β) : Subsingleton α ↔ Subsingleton β :=
⟨fun _ => e.symm.subsingleton, fun _ => e.subsingleton⟩
instance equiv_subsingleton_cod [Subsingleton β] : Subsingleton (α ≃ β) :=
⟨fun _ _ => Equiv.ext fun _ => Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩
instance equiv_subsingleton_dom [Subsingleton α] : Subsingleton (α ≃ β) :=
⟨fun f _ => Equiv.ext fun _ => @Subsingleton.elim _ (Equiv.subsingleton.symm f) _ _⟩
instance permUnique [Subsingleton α] : Unique (Perm α) :=
uniqueOfSubsingleton (Equiv.refl α)
theorem Perm.subsingleton_eq_refl [Subsingleton α] (e : Perm α) : e = Equiv.refl α :=
Subsingleton.elim _ _
protected theorem nontrivial {α β} (e : α ≃ β) [Nontrivial β] : Nontrivial α :=
e.surjective.nontrivial
theorem nontrivial_congr {α β} (e : α ≃ β) : Nontrivial α ↔ Nontrivial β :=
⟨fun _ ↦ e.symm.nontrivial, fun _ ↦ e.nontrivial⟩
/-- Transfer `DecidableEq` across an equivalence. -/
protected def decidableEq (e : α ≃ β) [DecidableEq β] : DecidableEq α :=
e.injective.decidableEq
theorem nonempty_congr (e : α ≃ β) : Nonempty α ↔ Nonempty β := Nonempty.congr e e.symm
protected theorem nonempty (e : α ≃ β) [Nonempty β] : Nonempty α := e.nonempty_congr.mpr ‹_›
/-- If `α ≃ β` and `β` is inhabited, then so is `α`. -/
protected def inhabited [Inhabited β] (e : α ≃ β) : Inhabited α := ⟨e.symm default⟩
/-- If `α ≃ β` and `β` is a singleton type, then so is `α`. -/
protected def unique [Unique β] (e : α ≃ β) : Unique α := e.symm.surjective.unique
/-- Equivalence between equal types. -/
protected def cast {α β : Sort _} (h : α = β) : α ≃ β :=
⟨cast h, cast h.symm, fun _ => by cases h; rfl, fun _ => by cases h; rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem coe_fn_symm_mk (f : α → β) (g l r) : ((Equiv.mk f g l r).symm : β → α) = g := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_refl : (Equiv.refl α : α → α) = id := rfl
/-- This cannot be a `simp` lemmas as it incorrectly matches against `e : α ≃ synonym α`, when
`synonym α` is semireducible. This makes a mess of `Multiplicative.ofAdd` etc. -/
theorem Perm.coe_subsingleton {α : Type*} [Subsingleton α] (e : Perm α) : (e : α → α) = id := by
rw [Perm.subsingleton_eq_refl e, coe_refl]
@[simp] theorem refl_apply (x : α) : Equiv.refl α x = x := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_trans (f : α ≃ β) (g : β ≃ γ) : (f.trans g : α → γ) = g ∘ f := rfl
@[simp] theorem trans_apply (f : α ≃ β) (g : β ≃ γ) (a : α) : (f.trans g) a = g (f a) := rfl
@[simp] theorem apply_symm_apply (e : α ≃ β) (x : β) : e (e.symm x) = x := e.right_inv x
@[simp] theorem symm_apply_apply (e : α ≃ β) (x : α) : e.symm (e x) = x := e.left_inv x
@[simp] theorem symm_comp_self (e : α ≃ β) : e.symm ∘ e = id := funext e.symm_apply_apply
@[simp] theorem self_comp_symm (e : α ≃ β) : e ∘ e.symm = id := funext e.apply_symm_apply
@[simp] lemma _root_.EquivLike.apply_coe_symm_apply {F} [EquivLike F α β] (e : F) (x : β) :
e ((e : α ≃ β).symm x) = x :=
(e : α ≃ β).apply_symm_apply x
@[simp] lemma _root_.EquivLike.coe_symm_apply_apply {F} [EquivLike F α β] (e : F) (x : α) :
(e : α ≃ β).symm (e x) = x :=
(e : α ≃ β).symm_apply_apply x
@[simp] lemma _root_.EquivLike.coe_symm_comp_self {F} [EquivLike F α β] (e : F) :
(e : α ≃ β).symm ∘ e = id :=
(e : α ≃ β).symm_comp_self
@[simp] lemma _root_.EquivLike.self_comp_coe_symm {F} [EquivLike F α β] (e : F) :
e ∘ (e : α ≃ β).symm = id :=
(e : α ≃ β).self_comp_symm
@[simp] theorem symm_trans_apply (f : α ≃ β) (g : β ≃ γ) (a : γ) :
(f.trans g).symm a = f.symm (g.symm a) := rfl
theorem symm_symm_apply (f : α ≃ β) (b : α) : f.symm.symm b = f b := rfl
theorem apply_eq_iff_eq (f : α ≃ β) {x y : α} : f x = f y ↔ x = y := EquivLike.apply_eq_iff_eq f
theorem apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply {x : α} {y : β} (f : α ≃ β) : f x = y ↔ x = f.symm y := by
conv_lhs => rw [← apply_symm_apply f y]
rw [apply_eq_iff_eq]
@[simp] theorem cast_apply {α β} (h : α = β) (x : α) : Equiv.cast h x = cast h x := rfl
@[simp] theorem cast_symm {α β} (h : α = β) : (Equiv.cast h).symm = Equiv.cast h.symm := rfl
@[simp] theorem cast_refl {α} (h : α = α := rfl) : Equiv.cast h = Equiv.refl α := rfl
@[simp] theorem cast_trans {α β γ} (h : α = β) (h2 : β = γ) :
(Equiv.cast h).trans (Equiv.cast h2) = Equiv.cast (h.trans h2) :=
ext fun x => by substs h h2; rfl
theorem cast_eq_iff_heq {α β} (h : α = β) {a : α} {b : β} : Equiv.cast h a = b ↔ HEq a b := by
subst h; simp [coe_refl]
theorem symm_apply_eq {α β} (e : α ≃ β) {x y} : e.symm x = y ↔ x = e y :=
⟨fun H => by simp [H.symm], fun H => by simp [H]⟩
theorem eq_symm_apply {α β} (e : α ≃ β) {x y} : y = e.symm x ↔ e y = x :=
(eq_comm.trans e.symm_apply_eq).trans eq_comm
@[simp] theorem symm_symm (e : α ≃ β) : e.symm.symm = e := rfl
theorem symm_bijective : Function.Bijective (Equiv.symm : (α ≃ β) → β ≃ α) :=
Function.bijective_iff_has_inverse.mpr ⟨_, symm_symm, symm_symm⟩
@[simp] theorem trans_refl (e : α ≃ β) : e.trans (Equiv.refl β) = e := by cases e; rfl
@[simp] theorem refl_symm : (Equiv.refl α).symm = Equiv.refl α := rfl
@[simp] theorem refl_trans (e : α ≃ β) : (Equiv.refl α).trans e = e := by cases e; rfl
@[simp] theorem symm_trans_self (e : α ≃ β) : e.symm.trans e = Equiv.refl β := ext <| by simp
@[simp] theorem self_trans_symm (e : α ≃ β) : e.trans e.symm = Equiv.refl α := ext <| by simp
theorem trans_assoc {δ} (ab : α ≃ β) (bc : β ≃ γ) (cd : γ ≃ δ) :
(ab.trans bc).trans cd = ab.trans (bc.trans cd) := Equiv.ext fun _ => rfl
theorem leftInverse_symm (f : Equiv α β) : LeftInverse f.symm f := f.left_inv
theorem rightInverse_symm (f : Equiv α β) : Function.RightInverse f.symm f := f.right_inv
theorem injective_comp (e : α ≃ β) (f : β → γ) : Injective (f ∘ e) ↔ Injective f :=
EquivLike.injective_comp e f
theorem comp_injective (f : α → β) (e : β ≃ γ) : Injective (e ∘ f) ↔ Injective f :=
EquivLike.comp_injective f e
theorem surjective_comp (e : α ≃ β) (f : β → γ) : Surjective (f ∘ e) ↔ Surjective f :=
EquivLike.surjective_comp e f
theorem comp_surjective (f : α → β) (e : β ≃ γ) : Surjective (e ∘ f) ↔ Surjective f :=
EquivLike.comp_surjective f e
theorem bijective_comp (e : α ≃ β) (f : β → γ) : Bijective (f ∘ e) ↔ Bijective f :=
EquivLike.bijective_comp e f
theorem comp_bijective (f : α → β) (e : β ≃ γ) : Bijective (e ∘ f) ↔ Bijective f :=
EquivLike.comp_bijective f e
/-- If `α` is equivalent to `β` and `γ` is equivalent to `δ`, then the type of equivalences `α ≃ γ`
is equivalent to the type of equivalences `β ≃ δ`. -/
def equivCongr {δ : Sort*} (ab : α ≃ β) (cd : γ ≃ δ) : (α ≃ γ) ≃ (β ≃ δ) where
toFun ac := (ab.symm.trans ac).trans cd
invFun bd := ab.trans <| bd.trans <| cd.symm
left_inv ac := by ext x; simp only [trans_apply, comp_apply, symm_apply_apply]
right_inv ac := by ext x; simp only [trans_apply, comp_apply, apply_symm_apply]
@[simp] theorem equivCongr_refl {α β} :
(Equiv.refl α).equivCongr (Equiv.refl β) = Equiv.refl (α ≃ β) := by ext; rfl
@[simp] theorem equivCongr_symm {δ} (ab : α ≃ β) (cd : γ ≃ δ) :
(ab.equivCongr cd).symm = ab.symm.equivCongr cd.symm := by ext; rfl
@[simp] theorem equivCongr_trans {δ ε ζ} (ab : α ≃ β) (de : δ ≃ ε) (bc : β ≃ γ) (ef : ε ≃ ζ) :
(ab.equivCongr de).trans (bc.equivCongr ef) = (ab.trans bc).equivCongr (de.trans ef) := by
ext; rfl
@[simp] theorem equivCongr_refl_left {α β γ} (bg : β ≃ γ) (e : α ≃ β) :
(Equiv.refl α).equivCongr bg e = e.trans bg := rfl
@[simp] theorem equivCongr_refl_right {α β} (ab e : α ≃ β) :
ab.equivCongr (Equiv.refl β) e = ab.symm.trans e := rfl
@[simp] theorem equivCongr_apply_apply {δ} (ab : α ≃ β) (cd : γ ≃ δ) (e : α ≃ γ) (x) :
ab.equivCongr cd e x = cd (e (ab.symm x)) := rfl
section permCongr
variable {α' β' : Type*} (e : α' ≃ β')
/-- If `α` is equivalent to `β`, then `Perm α` is equivalent to `Perm β`. -/
| def permCongr : Perm α' ≃ Perm β' := equivCongr e e
| Mathlib/Logic/Equiv/Defs.lean | 362 | 362 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Derivation.Killing
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Killing
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Sl2
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Weights.Chain
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Eigenspace.Semisimple
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.JordanChevalley
/-!
# Roots of Lie algebras with non-degenerate Killing forms
The file contains definitions and results about roots of Lie algebras with non-degenerate Killing
forms.
## Main definitions
* `LieAlgebra.IsKilling.ker_restrict_eq_bot_of_isCartanSubalgebra`: if the Killing form of
a Lie algebra is non-singular, it remains non-singular when restricted to a Cartan subalgebra.
* `LieAlgebra.IsKilling.instIsLieAbelianOfIsCartanSubalgebra`: if the Killing form of a Lie
algebra is non-singular, then its Cartan subalgebras are Abelian.
* `LieAlgebra.IsKilling.isSemisimple_ad_of_mem_isCartanSubalgebra`: over a perfect field, if a Lie
algebra has non-degenerate Killing form, Cartan subalgebras contain only semisimple elements.
* `LieAlgebra.IsKilling.span_weight_eq_top`: given a splitting Cartan subalgebra `H` of a
finite-dimensional Lie algebra with non-singular Killing form, the corresponding roots span the
dual space of `H`.
* `LieAlgebra.IsKilling.coroot`: the coroot corresponding to a root.
* `LieAlgebra.IsKilling.isCompl_ker_weight_span_coroot`: given a root `α` with respect to a Cartan
subalgebra `H`, we have a natural decomposition of `H` as the kernel of `α` and the span of the
coroot corresponding to `α`.
* `LieAlgebra.IsKilling.finrank_rootSpace_eq_one`: root spaces are one-dimensional.
-/
variable (R K L : Type*) [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R L] [Field K] [LieAlgebra K L]
namespace LieAlgebra
lemma restrict_killingForm (H : LieSubalgebra R L) :
(killingForm R L).restrict H = LieModule.traceForm R H L :=
rfl
namespace IsKilling
variable [IsKilling R L]
/-- If the Killing form of a Lie algebra is non-singular, it remains non-singular when restricted
to a Cartan subalgebra. -/
lemma ker_restrict_eq_bot_of_isCartanSubalgebra
[IsNoetherian R L] [IsArtinian R L] (H : LieSubalgebra R L) [H.IsCartanSubalgebra] :
LinearMap.ker ((killingForm R L).restrict H) = ⊥ := by
have h : Codisjoint (rootSpace H 0) (LieModule.posFittingComp R H L) :=
(LieModule.isCompl_genWeightSpace_zero_posFittingComp R H L).codisjoint
replace h : Codisjoint (H : Submodule R L) (LieModule.posFittingComp R H L : Submodule R L) := by
rwa [codisjoint_iff, ← LieSubmodule.toSubmodule_inj, LieSubmodule.sup_toSubmodule,
LieSubmodule.top_toSubmodule, rootSpace_zero_eq R L H, LieSubalgebra.coe_toLieSubmodule,
← codisjoint_iff] at h
suffices this : ∀ m₀ ∈ H, ∀ m₁ ∈ LieModule.posFittingComp R H L, killingForm R L m₀ m₁ = 0 by
simp [LinearMap.BilinForm.ker_restrict_eq_of_codisjoint h this]
intro m₀ h₀ m₁ h₁
exact killingForm_eq_zero_of_mem_zeroRoot_mem_posFitting R L H (le_zeroRootSubalgebra R L H h₀) h₁
@[simp] lemma ker_traceForm_eq_bot_of_isCartanSubalgebra
[IsNoetherian R L] [IsArtinian R L] (H : LieSubalgebra R L) [H.IsCartanSubalgebra] :
LinearMap.ker (LieModule.traceForm R H L) = ⊥ :=
ker_restrict_eq_bot_of_isCartanSubalgebra R L H
lemma traceForm_cartan_nondegenerate
[IsNoetherian R L] [IsArtinian R L] (H : LieSubalgebra R L) [H.IsCartanSubalgebra] :
(LieModule.traceForm R H L).Nondegenerate := by
simp [LinearMap.BilinForm.nondegenerate_iff_ker_eq_bot]
variable [Module.Free R L] [Module.Finite R L]
instance instIsLieAbelianOfIsCartanSubalgebra
[IsDomain R] [IsPrincipalIdealRing R] [IsArtinian R L]
(H : LieSubalgebra R L) [H.IsCartanSubalgebra] :
IsLieAbelian H :=
LieModule.isLieAbelian_of_ker_traceForm_eq_bot R H L <|
ker_restrict_eq_bot_of_isCartanSubalgebra R L H
end IsKilling
section Field
open Module LieModule Set
open Submodule (span subset_span)
variable [FiniteDimensional K L] (H : LieSubalgebra K L) [H.IsCartanSubalgebra]
section
variable [IsTriangularizable K H L]
/-- For any `α` and `β`, the corresponding root spaces are orthogonal with respect to the Killing
form, provided `α + β ≠ 0`. -/
lemma killingForm_apply_eq_zero_of_mem_rootSpace_of_add_ne_zero {α β : H → K} {x y : L}
(hx : x ∈ rootSpace H α) (hy : y ∈ rootSpace H β) (hαβ : α + β ≠ 0) :
killingForm K L x y = 0 := by
/- If `ad R L z` is semisimple for all `z ∈ H` then writing `⟪x, y⟫ = killingForm K L x y`, there
is a slick proof of this lemma that requires only invariance of the Killing form as follows.
For any `z ∈ H`, we have:
`α z • ⟪x, y⟫ = ⟪α z • x, y⟫ = ⟪⁅z, x⁆, y⟫ = - ⟪x, ⁅z, y⁆⟫ = - ⟪x, β z • y⟫ = - β z • ⟪x, y⟫`.
Since this is true for any `z`, we thus have: `(α + β) • ⟪x, y⟫ = 0`, and hence the result.
However the semisimplicity of `ad R L z` is (a) non-trivial and (b) requires the assumption
that `K` is a perfect field and `L` has non-degenerate Killing form. -/
let σ : (H → K) → (H → K) := fun γ ↦ α + (β + γ)
have hσ : ∀ γ, σ γ ≠ γ := fun γ ↦ by simpa only [σ, ← add_assoc] using add_ne_right.mpr hαβ
let f : Module.End K L := (ad K L x) ∘ₗ (ad K L y)
have hf : ∀ γ, MapsTo f (rootSpace H γ) (rootSpace H (σ γ)) := fun γ ↦
(mapsTo_toEnd_genWeightSpace_add_of_mem_rootSpace K L H L α (β + γ) hx).comp <|
mapsTo_toEnd_genWeightSpace_add_of_mem_rootSpace K L H L β γ hy
classical
have hds := DirectSum.isInternal_submodule_of_iSupIndep_of_iSup_eq_top
(LieSubmodule.iSupIndep_toSubmodule.mpr <| iSupIndep_genWeightSpace K H L)
(LieSubmodule.iSup_toSubmodule_eq_top.mpr <| iSup_genWeightSpace_eq_top K H L)
exact LinearMap.trace_eq_zero_of_mapsTo_ne hds σ hσ hf
/-- Elements of the `α` root space which are Killing-orthogonal to the `-α` root space are
Killing-orthogonal to all of `L`. -/
lemma mem_ker_killingForm_of_mem_rootSpace_of_forall_rootSpace_neg
{α : H → K} {x : L} (hx : x ∈ rootSpace H α)
(hx' : ∀ y ∈ rootSpace H (-α), killingForm K L x y = 0) :
x ∈ LinearMap.ker (killingForm K L) := by
rw [LinearMap.mem_ker]
ext y
have hy : y ∈ ⨆ β, rootSpace H β := by simp [iSup_genWeightSpace_eq_top K H L]
induction hy using LieSubmodule.iSup_induction' with
| mem β y hy =>
by_cases hαβ : α + β = 0
· exact hx' _ (add_eq_zero_iff_neg_eq.mp hαβ ▸ hy)
· exact killingForm_apply_eq_zero_of_mem_rootSpace_of_add_ne_zero K L H hx hy hαβ
| zero => simp
| add => simp_all
end
namespace IsKilling
variable [IsKilling K L]
/-- If a Lie algebra `L` has non-degenerate Killing form, the only element of a Cartan subalgebra
whose adjoint action on `L` is nilpotent, is the zero element.
Over a perfect field a much stronger result is true, see
`LieAlgebra.IsKilling.isSemisimple_ad_of_mem_isCartanSubalgebra`. -/
lemma eq_zero_of_isNilpotent_ad_of_mem_isCartanSubalgebra {x : L} (hx : x ∈ H)
(hx' : _root_.IsNilpotent (ad K L x)) : x = 0 := by
suffices ⟨x, hx⟩ ∈ LinearMap.ker (traceForm K H L) by
simp at this
exact (AddSubmonoid.mk_eq_zero H.toAddSubmonoid).mp this
simp only [LinearMap.mem_ker]
ext y
have comm : Commute (toEnd K H L ⟨x, hx⟩) (toEnd K H L y) := by
rw [commute_iff_lie_eq, ← LieHom.map_lie, trivial_lie_zero, LieHom.map_zero]
rw [traceForm_apply_apply, ← Module.End.mul_eq_comp, LinearMap.zero_apply]
exact (LinearMap.isNilpotent_trace_of_isNilpotent (comm.isNilpotent_mul_left hx')).eq_zero
@[simp]
lemma corootSpace_zero_eq_bot :
corootSpace (0 : H → K) = ⊥ := by
refine eq_bot_iff.mpr fun x hx ↦ ?_
suffices {x | ∃ y ∈ H, ∃ z ∈ H, ⁅y, z⁆ = x} = {0} by simpa [mem_corootSpace, this] using hx
refine eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem.mpr ⟨⟨0, H.zero_mem, 0, H.zero_mem, zero_lie 0⟩, ?_⟩
rintro - ⟨y, hy, z, hz, rfl⟩
suffices ⁅(⟨y, hy⟩ : H), (⟨z, hz⟩ : H)⁆ = 0 by
simpa only [Subtype.ext_iff, LieSubalgebra.coe_bracket, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero] using this
simp
variable {K L} in
/-- The restriction of the Killing form to a Cartan subalgebra, as a linear equivalence to the
dual. -/
@[simps! apply_apply]
noncomputable def cartanEquivDual :
H ≃ₗ[K] Module.Dual K H :=
(traceForm K H L).toDual <| traceForm_cartan_nondegenerate K L H
variable {K L H}
/-- The coroot corresponding to a root. -/
noncomputable def coroot (α : Weight K H L) : H :=
2 • (α <| (cartanEquivDual H).symm α)⁻¹ • (cartanEquivDual H).symm α
lemma traceForm_coroot (α : Weight K H L) (x : H) :
traceForm K H L (coroot α) x = 2 • (α <| (cartanEquivDual H).symm α)⁻¹ • α x := by
have : cartanEquivDual H ((cartanEquivDual H).symm α) x = α x := by
rw [LinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply, Weight.toLinear_apply]
rw [coroot, map_nsmul, map_smul, LinearMap.smul_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply]
congr 2
variable [IsTriangularizable K H L]
lemma lie_eq_killingForm_smul_of_mem_rootSpace_of_mem_rootSpace_neg_aux
{α : Weight K H L} {e f : L} (heα : e ∈ rootSpace H α) (hfα : f ∈ rootSpace H (-α))
(aux : ∀ (h : H), ⁅h, e⁆ = α h • e) :
⁅e, f⁆ = killingForm K L e f • (cartanEquivDual H).symm α := by
set α' := (cartanEquivDual H).symm α
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← Submodule.mem_bot (R := K), ← ker_killingForm_eq_bot]
apply mem_ker_killingForm_of_mem_rootSpace_of_forall_rootSpace_neg (α := (0 : H → K))
· simp only [rootSpace_zero_eq, LieSubalgebra.mem_toLieSubmodule]
refine sub_mem ?_ (H.smul_mem _ α'.property)
simpa using mapsTo_toEnd_genWeightSpace_add_of_mem_rootSpace K L H L α (-α) heα hfα
· intro z hz
replace hz : z ∈ H := by simpa using hz
have he : ⁅z, e⁆ = α ⟨z, hz⟩ • e := aux ⟨z, hz⟩
have hαz : killingForm K L α' (⟨z, hz⟩ : H) = α ⟨z, hz⟩ :=
LinearMap.BilinForm.apply_toDual_symm_apply (hB := traceForm_cartan_nondegenerate K L H) _ _
simp [traceForm_comm K L L ⁅e, f⁆, ← traceForm_apply_lie_apply, he, mul_comm _ (α ⟨z, hz⟩), hαz]
/-- This is Proposition 4.18 from [carter2005] except that we use
`LieModule.exists_forall_lie_eq_smul` instead of Lie's theorem (and so avoid
assuming `K` has characteristic zero). -/
lemma cartanEquivDual_symm_apply_mem_corootSpace (α : Weight K H L) :
(cartanEquivDual H).symm α ∈ corootSpace α := by
obtain ⟨e : L, he₀ : e ≠ 0, he : ∀ x, ⁅x, e⁆ = α x • e⟩ := exists_forall_lie_eq_smul K H L α
have heα : e ∈ rootSpace H α := (mem_genWeightSpace L α e).mpr fun x ↦ ⟨1, by simp [← he x]⟩
obtain ⟨f, hfα, hf⟩ : ∃ f ∈ rootSpace H (-α), killingForm K L e f ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! he₀
simpa using mem_ker_killingForm_of_mem_rootSpace_of_forall_rootSpace_neg K L H heα he₀
suffices ⁅e, f⁆ = killingForm K L e f • ((cartanEquivDual H).symm α : L) from
(mem_corootSpace α).mpr <| Submodule.subset_span ⟨(killingForm K L e f)⁻¹ • e,
Submodule.smul_mem _ _ heα, f, hfα, by simpa [inv_smul_eq_iff₀ hf]⟩
exact lie_eq_killingForm_smul_of_mem_rootSpace_of_mem_rootSpace_neg_aux heα hfα he
/-- Given a splitting Cartan subalgebra `H` of a finite-dimensional Lie algebra with non-singular
Killing form, the corresponding roots span the dual space of `H`. -/
@[simp]
lemma span_weight_eq_top :
span K (range (Weight.toLinear K H L)) = ⊤ := by
refine eq_top_iff.mpr (le_trans ?_ (LieModule.range_traceForm_le_span_weight K H L))
rw [← traceForm_flip K H L, ← LinearMap.dualAnnihilator_ker_eq_range_flip,
ker_traceForm_eq_bot_of_isCartanSubalgebra, Submodule.dualAnnihilator_bot]
variable (K L H) in
@[simp]
lemma span_weight_isNonZero_eq_top :
span K ({α : Weight K H L | α.IsNonZero}.image (Weight.toLinear K H L)) = ⊤ := by
rw [← span_weight_eq_top]
refine le_antisymm (Submodule.span_mono <| by simp) ?_
suffices range (Weight.toLinear K H L) ⊆
insert 0 ({α : Weight K H L | α.IsNonZero}.image (Weight.toLinear K H L)) by
simpa only [Submodule.span_insert_zero] using Submodule.span_mono this
rintro - ⟨α, rfl⟩
simp only [mem_insert_iff, Weight.coe_toLinear_eq_zero_iff, mem_image, mem_setOf_eq]
tauto
@[simp]
lemma iInf_ker_weight_eq_bot :
⨅ α : Weight K H L, α.ker = ⊥ := by
rw [← Subspace.dualAnnihilator_inj, Subspace.dualAnnihilator_iInf_eq,
Submodule.dualAnnihilator_bot]
simp [← LinearMap.range_dualMap_eq_dualAnnihilator_ker, ← Submodule.span_range_eq_iSup]
section PerfectField
variable [PerfectField K]
open Module.End in
lemma isSemisimple_ad_of_mem_isCartanSubalgebra {x : L} (hx : x ∈ H) :
(ad K L x).IsSemisimple := by
/- Using Jordan-Chevalley, write `ad K L x` as a sum of its semisimple and nilpotent parts. -/
obtain ⟨N, -, S, hS₀, hN, hS, hSN⟩ := (ad K L x).exists_isNilpotent_isSemisimple
replace hS₀ : Commute (ad K L x) S := Algebra.commute_of_mem_adjoin_self hS₀
set x' : H := ⟨x, hx⟩
rw [eq_sub_of_add_eq hSN.symm] at hN
/- Note that the semisimple part `S` is just a scalar action on each root space. -/
have aux {α : H → K} {y : L} (hy : y ∈ rootSpace H α) : S y = α x' • y := by
replace hy : y ∈ (ad K L x).maxGenEigenspace (α x') :=
(genWeightSpace_le_genWeightSpaceOf L x' α) hy
rw [maxGenEigenspace_eq] at hy
set k := maxGenEigenspaceIndex (ad K L x) (α x')
rw [apply_eq_of_mem_of_comm_of_isFinitelySemisimple_of_isNil hy hS₀ hS.isFinitelySemisimple hN]
/- So `S` obeys the derivation axiom if we restrict to root spaces. -/
have h_der (y z : L) (α β : H → K) (hy : y ∈ rootSpace H α) (hz : z ∈ rootSpace H β) :
S ⁅y, z⁆ = ⁅S y, z⁆ + ⁅y, S z⁆ := by
have hyz : ⁅y, z⁆ ∈ rootSpace H (α + β) :=
mapsTo_toEnd_genWeightSpace_add_of_mem_rootSpace K L H L α β hy hz
rw [aux hy, aux hz, aux hyz, smul_lie, lie_smul, ← add_smul, ← Pi.add_apply]
/- Thus `S` is a derivation since root spaces span. -/
replace h_der (y z : L) : S ⁅y, z⁆ = ⁅S y, z⁆ + ⁅y, S z⁆ := by
have hy : y ∈ ⨆ α : H → K, rootSpace H α := by simp [iSup_genWeightSpace_eq_top]
have hz : z ∈ ⨆ α : H → K, rootSpace H α := by simp [iSup_genWeightSpace_eq_top]
induction hy using LieSubmodule.iSup_induction' with
| mem α y hy =>
induction hz using LieSubmodule.iSup_induction' with
| mem β z hz => exact h_der y z α β hy hz
| zero => simp
| add _ _ _ _ h h' => simp only [lie_add, map_add, h, h']; abel
| zero => simp
| add _ _ _ _ h h' => simp only [add_lie, map_add, h, h']; abel
/- An equivalent form of the derivation axiom used in `LieDerivation`. -/
replace h_der : ∀ y z : L, S ⁅y, z⁆ = ⁅y, S z⁆ - ⁅z, S y⁆ := by
simp_rw [← lie_skew (S _) _, add_comm, ← sub_eq_add_neg] at h_der; assumption
/- Bundle `S` as a `LieDerivation`. -/
let S' : LieDerivation K L L := ⟨S, h_der⟩
/- Since `L` has non-degenerate Killing form, `S` must be inner, corresponding to some `y : L`. -/
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := LieDerivation.IsKilling.exists_eq_ad S'
/- `y` commutes with all elements of `H` because `S` has eigenvalue 0 on `H`, `S = ad K L y`. -/
have hy' (z : L) (hz : z ∈ H) : ⁅y, z⁆ = 0 := by
rw [← LieSubalgebra.mem_toLieSubmodule, ← rootSpace_zero_eq] at hz
simp [S', ← ad_apply (R := K), ← LieDerivation.coe_ad_apply_eq_ad_apply, hy, aux hz]
/- Thus `y` belongs to `H` since `H` is self-normalizing. -/
replace hy' : y ∈ H := by
suffices y ∈ H.normalizer by rwa [LieSubalgebra.IsCartanSubalgebra.self_normalizing] at this
exact (H.mem_normalizer_iff y).mpr fun z hz ↦ hy' z hz ▸ LieSubalgebra.zero_mem H
/- It suffices to show `x = y` since `S = ad K L y` is semisimple. -/
suffices x = y by rwa [this, ← LieDerivation.coe_ad_apply_eq_ad_apply y, hy]
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
/- This will follow if we can show that `ad K L (x - y)` is nilpotent. -/
apply eq_zero_of_isNilpotent_ad_of_mem_isCartanSubalgebra K L H (H.sub_mem hx hy')
/- Which is true because `ad K L (x - y) = N`. -/
replace hy : S = ad K L y := by rw [← LieDerivation.coe_ad_apply_eq_ad_apply y, hy]
rwa [LieHom.map_sub, hSN, hy, add_sub_cancel_right, eq_sub_of_add_eq hSN.symm]
lemma lie_eq_smul_of_mem_rootSpace {α : H → K} {x : L} (hx : x ∈ rootSpace H α) (h : H) :
⁅h, x⁆ = α h • x := by
replace hx : x ∈ (ad K L h).maxGenEigenspace (α h) :=
genWeightSpace_le_genWeightSpaceOf L h α hx
rw [(isSemisimple_ad_of_mem_isCartanSubalgebra
h.property).isFinitelySemisimple.maxGenEigenspace_eq_eigenspace,
Module.End.mem_eigenspace_iff] at hx
simpa using hx
lemma lie_eq_killingForm_smul_of_mem_rootSpace_of_mem_rootSpace_neg
{α : Weight K H L} {e f : L} (heα : e ∈ rootSpace H α) (hfα : f ∈ rootSpace H (-α)) :
⁅e, f⁆ = killingForm K L e f • (cartanEquivDual H).symm α := by
apply lie_eq_killingForm_smul_of_mem_rootSpace_of_mem_rootSpace_neg_aux heα hfα
exact lie_eq_smul_of_mem_rootSpace heα
lemma coe_corootSpace_eq_span_singleton' (α : Weight K H L) :
(corootSpace α).toSubmodule = K ∙ (cartanEquivDual H).symm α := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· intro ⟨x, hx⟩ hx'
have : {⁅y, z⁆ | (y ∈ rootSpace H α) (z ∈ rootSpace H (-α))} ⊆
K ∙ ((cartanEquivDual H).symm α : L) := by
rintro - ⟨e, heα, f, hfα, rfl⟩
rw [lie_eq_killingForm_smul_of_mem_rootSpace_of_mem_rootSpace_neg heα hfα, SetLike.mem_coe,
Submodule.mem_span_singleton]
exact ⟨killingForm K L e f, rfl⟩
simp only [LieSubmodule.mem_toSubmodule, mem_corootSpace] at hx'
replace this := Submodule.span_mono this hx'
rw [Submodule.span_span] at this
rw [Submodule.mem_span_singleton] at this ⊢
obtain ⟨t, rfl⟩ := this
use t
simp only [Subtype.ext_iff]
rw [Submodule.coe_smul_of_tower]
· simp only [Submodule.span_singleton_le_iff_mem, LieSubmodule.mem_toSubmodule]
exact cartanEquivDual_symm_apply_mem_corootSpace α
end PerfectField
section CharZero
variable [CharZero K]
/-- The contrapositive of this result is very useful, taking `x` to be the element of `H`
corresponding to a root `α` under the identification between `H` and `H^*` provided by the Killing
form. -/
lemma eq_zero_of_apply_eq_zero_of_mem_corootSpace
(x : H) (α : H → K) (hαx : α x = 0) (hx : x ∈ corootSpace α) :
x = 0 := by
rcases eq_or_ne α 0 with rfl | hα; · simpa using hx
replace hx : x ∈ ⨅ β : Weight K H L, β.ker := by
refine (Submodule.mem_iInf _).mpr fun β ↦ ?_
obtain ⟨a, b, hb, hab⟩ :=
exists_forall_mem_corootSpace_smul_add_eq_zero L α β hα β.genWeightSpace_ne_bot
simpa [hαx, hb.ne'] using hab _ hx
simpa using hx
lemma disjoint_ker_weight_corootSpace (α : Weight K H L) :
Disjoint α.ker (corootSpace α) := by
rw [disjoint_iff]
refine (Submodule.eq_bot_iff _).mpr fun x ⟨hαx, hx⟩ ↦ ?_
replace hαx : α x = 0 := by simpa using hαx
exact eq_zero_of_apply_eq_zero_of_mem_corootSpace x α hαx hx
lemma root_apply_cartanEquivDual_symm_ne_zero {α : Weight K H L} (hα : α.IsNonZero) :
α ((cartanEquivDual H).symm α) ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! hα
suffices (cartanEquivDual H).symm α ∈ α.ker ⊓ corootSpace α by
rw [(disjoint_ker_weight_corootSpace α).eq_bot] at this
simpa using this
exact Submodule.mem_inf.mp ⟨hα, cartanEquivDual_symm_apply_mem_corootSpace α⟩
lemma root_apply_coroot {α : Weight K H L} (hα : α.IsNonZero) :
α (coroot α) = 2 := by
| rw [← Weight.coe_coe]
simpa [coroot] using inv_mul_cancel₀ (root_apply_cartanEquivDual_symm_ne_zero hα)
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/Weights/Killing.lean | 388 | 389 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Cuma Kökmen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Cuma Kökmen, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.CircleIntegral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Prod
import Mathlib.Order.Fin.Tuple
import Mathlib.Util.Superscript
/-!
# Integral over a torus in `ℂⁿ`
In this file we define the integral of a function `f : ℂⁿ → E` over a torus
`{z : ℂⁿ | ∀ i, z i ∈ Metric.sphere (c i) (R i)}`. In order to do this, we define
`torusMap (c : ℂⁿ) (R θ : ℝⁿ)` to be the point in `ℂⁿ` given by $z_k=c_k+R_ke^{θ_ki}$,
where $i$ is the imaginary unit, then define `torusIntegral f c R` as the integral over
the cube $[0, (fun _ ↦ 2π)] = \{θ\|∀ k, 0 ≤ θ_k ≤ 2π\}$ of the Jacobian of the
`torusMap` multiplied by `f (torusMap c R θ)`.
We also define a predicate saying that `f ∘ torusMap c R` is integrable on the cube
`[0, (fun _ ↦ 2π)]`.
## Main definitions
* `torusMap c R`: the generalized multidimensional exponential map from `ℝⁿ` to `ℂⁿ` that sends
$θ=(θ_0,…,θ_{n-1})$ to $z=(z_0,…,z_{n-1})$, where $z_k= c_k + R_ke^{θ_k i}$;
* `TorusIntegrable f c R`: a function `f : ℂⁿ → E` is integrable over the generalized torus
with center `c : ℂⁿ` and radius `R : ℝⁿ` if `f ∘ torusMap c R` is integrable on the
closed cube `Icc (0 : ℝⁿ) (fun _ ↦ 2 * π)`;
* `torusIntegral f c R`: the integral of a function `f : ℂⁿ → E` over a torus with
center `c ∈ ℂⁿ` and radius `R ∈ ℝⁿ` defined as
$\iiint_{[0, 2 * π]} (∏_{k = 1}^{n} i R_k e^{θ_k * i}) • f (c + Re^{θ_k i})\,dθ_0…dθ_{k-1}$.
## Main statements
* `torusIntegral_dim0`, `torusIntegral_dim1`, `torusIntegral_succ`: formulas for `torusIntegral`
in cases of dimension `0`, `1`, and `n + 1`.
## Notations
- `ℝ⁰`, `ℝ¹`, `ℝⁿ`, `ℝⁿ⁺¹`: local notation for `Fin 0 → ℝ`, `Fin 1 → ℝ`, `Fin n → ℝ`, and
`Fin (n + 1) → ℝ`, respectively;
- `ℂ⁰`, `ℂ¹`, `ℂⁿ`, `ℂⁿ⁺¹`: local notation for `Fin 0 → ℂ`, `Fin 1 → ℂ`, `Fin n → ℂ`, and
`Fin (n + 1) → ℂ`, respectively;
- `∯ z in T(c, R), f z`: notation for `torusIntegral f c R`;
- `∮ z in C(c, R), f z`: notation for `circleIntegral f c R`, defined elsewhere;
- `∏ k, f k`: notation for `Finset.prod`, defined elsewhere;
- `π`: notation for `Real.pi`, defined elsewhere.
## Tags
integral, torus
-/
variable {n : ℕ}
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
noncomputable section
open Complex Set MeasureTheory Function Filter TopologicalSpace
open Mathlib.Tactic (superscriptTerm)
open scoped Real
local syntax:arg term:max noWs superscriptTerm : term
local macro_rules | `($t:term$n:superscript) => `(Fin $n → $t)
/-!
### `torusMap`, a parametrization of a torus
-/
/-- The n dimensional exponential map $θ_i ↦ c + R e^{θ_i*I}, θ ∈ ℝⁿ$ representing
a torus in `ℂⁿ` with center `c ∈ ℂⁿ` and generalized radius `R ∈ ℝⁿ`, so we can adjust
it to every n axis. -/
def torusMap (c : ℂⁿ) (R : ℝⁿ) : ℝⁿ → ℂⁿ := fun θ i => c i + R i * exp (θ i * I)
theorem torusMap_sub_center (c : ℂⁿ) (R : ℝⁿ) (θ : ℝⁿ) : torusMap c R θ - c = torusMap 0 R θ := by
ext1 i; simp [torusMap]
theorem torusMap_eq_center_iff {c : ℂⁿ} {R : ℝⁿ} {θ : ℝⁿ} : torusMap c R θ = c ↔ R = 0 := by
simp [funext_iff, torusMap, exp_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem torusMap_zero_radius (c : ℂⁿ) : torusMap c 0 = const ℝⁿ c :=
funext fun _ ↦ torusMap_eq_center_iff.2 rfl
/-!
### Integrability of a function on a generalized torus
-/
/-- A function `f : ℂⁿ → E` is integrable on the generalized torus if the function
`f ∘ torusMap c R θ` is integrable on `Icc (0 : ℝⁿ) (fun _ ↦ 2 * π)`. -/
def TorusIntegrable (f : ℂⁿ → E) (c : ℂⁿ) (R : ℝⁿ) : Prop :=
IntegrableOn (fun θ : ℝⁿ => f (torusMap c R θ)) (Icc (0 : ℝⁿ) fun _ => 2 * π) volume
namespace TorusIntegrable
variable {f g : ℂⁿ → E} {c : ℂⁿ} {R : ℝⁿ}
/-- Constant functions are torus integrable -/
theorem torusIntegrable_const (a : E) (c : ℂⁿ) (R : ℝⁿ) : TorusIntegrable (fun _ => a) c R := by
simp [TorusIntegrable, measure_Icc_lt_top]
/-- If `f` is torus integrable then `-f` is torus integrable. -/
protected nonrec theorem neg (hf : TorusIntegrable f c R) : TorusIntegrable (-f) c R := hf.neg
/-- If `f` and `g` are two torus integrable functions, then so is `f + g`. -/
protected nonrec theorem add (hf : TorusIntegrable f c R) (hg : TorusIntegrable g c R) :
TorusIntegrable (f + g) c R :=
hf.add hg
/-- If `f` and `g` are two torus integrable functions, then so is `f - g`. -/
protected nonrec theorem sub (hf : TorusIntegrable f c R) (hg : TorusIntegrable g c R) :
TorusIntegrable (f - g) c R :=
hf.sub hg
theorem torusIntegrable_zero_radius {f : ℂⁿ → E} {c : ℂⁿ} : TorusIntegrable f c 0 := by
rw [TorusIntegrable, torusMap_zero_radius]
apply torusIntegrable_const (f c) c 0
/-- The function given in the definition of `torusIntegral` is integrable. -/
theorem function_integrable [NormedSpace ℂ E] (hf : TorusIntegrable f c R) :
IntegrableOn (fun θ : ℝⁿ => (∏ i, R i * exp (θ i * I) * I : ℂ) • f (torusMap c R θ))
(Icc (0 : ℝⁿ) fun _ => 2 * π) volume := by
refine (hf.norm.const_mul (∏ i, |R i|)).mono' ?_ ?_
· refine (Continuous.aestronglyMeasurable ?_).smul hf.1; fun_prop
simp [norm_smul, map_prod]
end TorusIntegrable
variable [NormedSpace ℂ E] {f g : ℂⁿ → E} {c : ℂⁿ} {R : ℝⁿ}
/-- The integral over a generalized torus with center `c ∈ ℂⁿ` and radius `R ∈ ℝⁿ`, defined
as the `•`-product of the derivative of `torusMap` and `f (torusMap c R θ)` -/
def torusIntegral (f : ℂⁿ → E) (c : ℂⁿ) (R : ℝⁿ) :=
∫ θ : ℝⁿ in Icc (0 : ℝⁿ) fun _ => 2 * π, (∏ i, R i * exp (θ i * I) * I : ℂ) • f (torusMap c R θ)
@[inherit_doc torusIntegral]
notation3"∯ "(...)" in ""T("c", "R")"", "r:(scoped f => torusIntegral f c R) => r
theorem torusIntegral_radius_zero (hn : n ≠ 0) (f : ℂⁿ → E) (c : ℂⁿ) :
(∯ x in T(c, 0), f x) = 0 := by
simp only [torusIntegral, Pi.zero_apply, ofReal_zero, mul_zero, zero_mul, Fin.prod_const,
zero_pow hn, zero_smul, integral_zero]
theorem torusIntegral_neg (f : ℂⁿ → E) (c : ℂⁿ) (R : ℝⁿ) :
(∯ x in T(c, R), -f x) = -∯ x in T(c, R), f x := by simp [torusIntegral, integral_neg]
theorem torusIntegral_add (hf : TorusIntegrable f c R) (hg : TorusIntegrable g c R) :
(∯ x in T(c, R), f x + g x) = (∯ x in T(c, R), f x) + ∯ x in T(c, R), g x := by
simpa only [torusIntegral, smul_add, Pi.add_apply] using
integral_add hf.function_integrable hg.function_integrable
theorem torusIntegral_sub (hf : TorusIntegrable f c R) (hg : TorusIntegrable g c R) :
(∯ x in T(c, R), f x - g x) = (∯ x in T(c, R), f x) - ∯ x in T(c, R), g x := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg, ← torusIntegral_neg] using torusIntegral_add hf hg.neg
theorem torusIntegral_smul {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [SMulCommClass 𝕜 ℂ E] (a : 𝕜)
(f : ℂⁿ → E) (c : ℂⁿ) (R : ℝⁿ) : (∯ x in T(c, R), a • f x) = a • ∯ x in T(c, R), f x := by
simp only [torusIntegral, integral_smul, ← smul_comm a (_ : ℂ) (_ : E)]
theorem torusIntegral_const_mul (a : ℂ) (f : ℂⁿ → ℂ) (c : ℂⁿ) (R : ℝⁿ) :
(∯ x in T(c, R), a * f x) = a * ∯ x in T(c, R), f x :=
torusIntegral_smul a f c R
/-- If for all `θ : ℝⁿ`, `‖f (torusMap c R θ)‖` is less than or equal to a constant `C : ℝ`, then
`‖∯ x in T(c, R), f x‖` is less than or equal to `(2 * π)^n * (∏ i, |R i|) * C` -/
theorem norm_torusIntegral_le_of_norm_le_const {C : ℝ} (hf : ∀ θ, ‖f (torusMap c R θ)‖ ≤ C) :
‖∯ x in T(c, R), f x‖ ≤ ((2 * π) ^ (n : ℕ) * ∏ i, |R i|) * C :=
calc
‖∯ x in T(c, R), f x‖ ≤ (∏ i, |R i|) * C * (volume (Icc (0 : ℝⁿ) fun _ => 2 * π)).toReal :=
norm_setIntegral_le_of_norm_le_const measure_Icc_lt_top fun θ _ =>
calc
‖(∏ i : Fin n, R i * exp (θ i * I) * I : ℂ) • f (torusMap c R θ)‖ =
(∏ i : Fin n, |R i|) * ‖f (torusMap c R θ)‖ := by simp [norm_smul]
_ ≤ (∏ i : Fin n, |R i|) * C := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (hf _) <| by positivity
_ = ((2 * π) ^ (n : ℕ) * ∏ i, |R i|) * C := by
simp only [Pi.zero_def, Real.volume_Icc_pi_toReal fun _ => Real.two_pi_pos.le, sub_zero,
Fin.prod_const, mul_assoc, mul_comm ((2 * π) ^ (n : ℕ))]
@[simp]
theorem torusIntegral_dim0 [CompleteSpace E]
(f : ℂ⁰ → E) (c : ℂ⁰) (R : ℝ⁰) : (∯ x in T(c, R), f x) = f c := by
simp only [torusIntegral, Fin.prod_univ_zero, one_smul,
Subsingleton.elim (fun _ : Fin 0 => 2 * π) 0, Icc_self, Measure.restrict_singleton, volume_pi,
integral_smul_measure, integral_dirac, Measure.pi_of_empty (fun _ : Fin 0 ↦ volume) 0,
Measure.dirac_apply_of_mem (mem_singleton _), Subsingleton.elim (torusMap c R 0) c]
/-- In dimension one, `torusIntegral` is the same as `circleIntegral`
(up to the natural equivalence between `ℂ` and `Fin 1 → ℂ`). -/
theorem torusIntegral_dim1 (f : ℂ¹ → E) (c : ℂ¹) (R : ℝ¹) :
(∯ x in T(c, R), f x) = ∮ z in C(c 0, R 0), f fun _ => z := by
have H₁ : (((MeasurableEquiv.funUnique _ _).symm) ⁻¹' Icc 0 fun _ => 2 * π) = Icc 0 (2 * π) :=
(OrderIso.funUnique (Fin 1) ℝ).symm.preimage_Icc _ _
have H₂ : torusMap c R = fun θ _ ↦ circleMap (c 0) (R 0) (θ 0) := by
ext θ i : 2
rw [Subsingleton.elim i 0]; rfl
rw [torusIntegral, circleIntegral, intervalIntegral.integral_of_le Real.two_pi_pos.le,
Measure.restrict_congr_set Ioc_ae_eq_Icc,
← ((volume_preserving_funUnique (Fin 1) ℝ).symm _).setIntegral_preimage_emb
(MeasurableEquiv.measurableEmbedding _), H₁, H₂]
simp [circleMap_zero]
/-- Recurrent formula for `torusIntegral`, see also `torusIntegral_succ`. -/
theorem torusIntegral_succAbove
{f : ℂⁿ⁺¹ → E} {c : ℂⁿ⁺¹} {R : ℝⁿ⁺¹} (hf : TorusIntegrable f c R)
(i : Fin (n + 1)) :
(∯ x in T(c, R), f x) =
∮ x in C(c i, R i), ∯ y in T(c ∘ i.succAbove, R ∘ i.succAbove), f (i.insertNth x y) := by
set e : ℝ × ℝⁿ ≃ᵐ ℝⁿ⁺¹ := (MeasurableEquiv.piFinSuccAbove (fun _ => ℝ) i).symm
have hem : MeasurePreserving e :=
(volume_preserving_piFinSuccAbove (fun _ : Fin (n + 1) => ℝ) i).symm _
have heπ : (e ⁻¹' Icc 0 fun _ => 2 * π) = Icc 0 (2 * π) ×ˢ Icc (0 : ℝⁿ) fun _ => 2 * π :=
((Fin.insertNthOrderIso (fun _ => ℝ) i).preimage_Icc _ _).trans (Icc_prod_eq _ _)
rw [torusIntegral, ← hem.map_eq, setIntegral_map_equiv, heπ, Measure.volume_eq_prod,
setIntegral_prod, circleIntegral_def_Icc]
· refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Icc fun θ _ => ?_
simp +unfoldPartialApp only [e, torusIntegral, ← integral_smul,
deriv_circleMap, i.prod_univ_succAbove _, smul_smul, torusMap, circleMap_zero]
refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Icc fun Θ _ => ?_
simp only [MeasurableEquiv.piFinSuccAbove_symm_apply, i.insertNth_apply_same,
i.insertNth_apply_succAbove, (· ∘ ·), Fin.insertNthEquiv, Equiv.coe_fn_mk]
congr 2
simp only [funext_iff, i.forall_iff_succAbove, circleMap, Fin.insertNth_apply_same,
eq_self_iff_true, Fin.insertNth_apply_succAbove, imp_true_iff, and_self_iff]
· have := hf.function_integrable
rwa [← hem.integrableOn_comp_preimage e.measurableEmbedding, heπ] at this
|
/-- Recurrent formula for `torusIntegral`, see also `torusIntegral_succAbove`. -/
theorem torusIntegral_succ
{f : ℂⁿ⁺¹ → E} {c : ℂⁿ⁺¹} {R : ℝⁿ⁺¹} (hf : TorusIntegrable f c R) :
(∯ x in T(c, R), f x) =
∮ x in C(c 0, R 0), ∯ y in T(c ∘ Fin.succ, R ∘ Fin.succ), f (Fin.cons x y) := by
simpa using torusIntegral_succAbove hf 0
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/TorusIntegral.lean | 232 | 253 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.ModelTheory.Ultraproducts
import Mathlib.ModelTheory.Bundled
import Mathlib.ModelTheory.Skolem
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.AtTopBot.Basic
/-!
# First-Order Satisfiability
This file deals with the satisfiability of first-order theories, as well as equivalence over them.
## Main Definitions
- `FirstOrder.Language.Theory.IsSatisfiable`: `T.IsSatisfiable` indicates that `T` has a nonempty
model.
- `FirstOrder.Language.Theory.IsFinitelySatisfiable`: `T.IsFinitelySatisfiable` indicates that
every finite subset of `T` is satisfiable.
- `FirstOrder.Language.Theory.IsComplete`: `T.IsComplete` indicates that `T` is satisfiable and
models each sentence or its negation.
- `Cardinal.Categorical`: A theory is `κ`-categorical if all models of size `κ` are isomorphic.
## Main Results
- The Compactness Theorem, `FirstOrder.Language.Theory.isSatisfiable_iff_isFinitelySatisfiable`,
shows that a theory is satisfiable iff it is finitely satisfiable.
- `FirstOrder.Language.completeTheory.isComplete`: The complete theory of a structure is
complete.
- `FirstOrder.Language.Theory.exists_large_model_of_infinite_model` shows that any theory with an
infinite model has arbitrarily large models.
- `FirstOrder.Language.Theory.exists_elementaryEmbedding_card_eq`: The Upward Löwenheim–Skolem
Theorem: If `κ` is a cardinal greater than the cardinalities of `L` and an infinite `L`-structure
`M`, then `M` has an elementary extension of cardinality `κ`.
## Implementation Details
- Satisfiability of an `L.Theory` `T` is defined in the minimal universe containing all the symbols
of `L`. By Löwenheim-Skolem, this is equivalent to satisfiability in any universe.
-/
universe u v w w'
open Cardinal CategoryTheory
open Cardinal FirstOrder
namespace FirstOrder
namespace Language
variable {L : Language.{u, v}} {T : L.Theory} {α : Type w} {n : ℕ}
namespace Theory
variable (T)
/-- A theory is satisfiable if a structure models it. -/
def IsSatisfiable : Prop :=
Nonempty (ModelType.{u, v, max u v} T)
/-- A theory is finitely satisfiable if all of its finite subtheories are satisfiable. -/
def IsFinitelySatisfiable : Prop :=
∀ T0 : Finset L.Sentence, (T0 : L.Theory) ⊆ T → IsSatisfiable (T0 : L.Theory)
variable {T} {T' : L.Theory}
theorem Model.isSatisfiable (M : Type w) [Nonempty M] [L.Structure M] [M ⊨ T] :
T.IsSatisfiable :=
⟨((⊥ : Substructure _ (ModelType.of T M)).elementarySkolem₁Reduct.toModel T).shrink⟩
theorem IsSatisfiable.mono (h : T'.IsSatisfiable) (hs : T ⊆ T') : T.IsSatisfiable :=
⟨(Theory.Model.mono (ModelType.is_model h.some) hs).bundled⟩
theorem isSatisfiable_empty (L : Language.{u, v}) : IsSatisfiable (∅ : L.Theory) :=
⟨default⟩
theorem isSatisfiable_of_isSatisfiable_onTheory {L' : Language.{w, w'}} (φ : L →ᴸ L')
(h : (φ.onTheory T).IsSatisfiable) : T.IsSatisfiable :=
Model.isSatisfiable (h.some.reduct φ)
theorem isSatisfiable_onTheory_iff {L' : Language.{w, w'}} {φ : L →ᴸ L'} (h : φ.Injective) :
(φ.onTheory T).IsSatisfiable ↔ T.IsSatisfiable := by
classical
refine ⟨isSatisfiable_of_isSatisfiable_onTheory φ, fun h' => ?_⟩
haveI : Inhabited h'.some := Classical.inhabited_of_nonempty'
exact Model.isSatisfiable (h'.some.defaultExpansion h)
theorem IsSatisfiable.isFinitelySatisfiable (h : T.IsSatisfiable) : T.IsFinitelySatisfiable :=
fun _ => h.mono
/-- The **Compactness Theorem of first-order logic**: A theory is satisfiable if and only if it is
finitely satisfiable. -/
theorem isSatisfiable_iff_isFinitelySatisfiable {T : L.Theory} :
T.IsSatisfiable ↔ T.IsFinitelySatisfiable :=
⟨Theory.IsSatisfiable.isFinitelySatisfiable, fun h => by
classical
set M : Finset T → Type max u v := fun T0 : Finset T =>
(h (T0.map (Function.Embedding.subtype fun x => x ∈ T)) T0.map_subtype_subset).some.Carrier
let M' := Filter.Product (Ultrafilter.of (Filter.atTop : Filter (Finset T))) M
have h' : M' ⊨ T := by
refine ⟨fun φ hφ => ?_⟩
rw [Ultraproduct.sentence_realize]
refine
Filter.Eventually.filter_mono (Ultrafilter.of_le _)
(Filter.eventually_atTop.2
⟨{⟨φ, hφ⟩}, fun s h' =>
Theory.realize_sentence_of_mem (s.map (Function.Embedding.subtype fun x => x ∈ T))
?_⟩)
simp only [Finset.coe_map, Function.Embedding.coe_subtype, Set.mem_image, Finset.mem_coe,
Subtype.exists, Subtype.coe_mk, exists_and_right, exists_eq_right]
exact ⟨hφ, h' (Finset.mem_singleton_self _)⟩
exact ⟨ModelType.of T M'⟩⟩
theorem isSatisfiable_directed_union_iff {ι : Type*} [Nonempty ι] {T : ι → L.Theory}
(h : Directed (· ⊆ ·) T) : Theory.IsSatisfiable (⋃ i, T i) ↔ ∀ i, (T i).IsSatisfiable := by
refine ⟨fun h' i => h'.mono (Set.subset_iUnion _ _), fun h' => ?_⟩
rw [isSatisfiable_iff_isFinitelySatisfiable, IsFinitelySatisfiable]
intro T0 hT0
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := h.exists_mem_subset_of_finset_subset_biUnion hT0
exact (h' i).mono hi
theorem isSatisfiable_union_distinctConstantsTheory_of_card_le (T : L.Theory) (s : Set α)
(M : Type w') [Nonempty M] [L.Structure M] [M ⊨ T]
(h : Cardinal.lift.{w'} #s ≤ Cardinal.lift.{w} #M) :
((L.lhomWithConstants α).onTheory T ∪ L.distinctConstantsTheory s).IsSatisfiable := by
haveI : Inhabited M := Classical.inhabited_of_nonempty inferInstance
rw [Cardinal.lift_mk_le'] at h
letI : (constantsOn α).Structure M := constantsOn.structure (Function.extend (↑) h.some default)
have : M ⊨ (L.lhomWithConstants α).onTheory T ∪ L.distinctConstantsTheory s := by
refine ((LHom.onTheory_model _ _).2 inferInstance).union ?_
rw [model_distinctConstantsTheory]
refine fun a as b bs ab => ?_
rw [← Subtype.coe_mk a as, ← Subtype.coe_mk b bs, ← Subtype.ext_iff]
exact
h.some.injective
((Subtype.coe_injective.extend_apply h.some default ⟨a, as⟩).symm.trans
(ab.trans (Subtype.coe_injective.extend_apply h.some default ⟨b, bs⟩)))
exact Model.isSatisfiable M
theorem isSatisfiable_union_distinctConstantsTheory_of_infinite (T : L.Theory) (s : Set α)
(M : Type w') [L.Structure M] [M ⊨ T] [Infinite M] :
((L.lhomWithConstants α).onTheory T ∪ L.distinctConstantsTheory s).IsSatisfiable := by
classical
rw [distinctConstantsTheory_eq_iUnion, Set.union_iUnion, isSatisfiable_directed_union_iff]
· exact fun t =>
isSatisfiable_union_distinctConstantsTheory_of_card_le T _ M
((lift_le_aleph0.2 (finset_card_lt_aleph0 _).le).trans
(aleph0_le_lift.2 (aleph0_le_mk M)))
· apply Monotone.directed_le
refine monotone_const.union (monotone_distinctConstantsTheory.comp ?_)
simp only [Finset.coe_map, Function.Embedding.coe_subtype]
exact Monotone.comp (g := Set.image ((↑) : s → α)) (f := ((↑) : Finset s → Set s))
Set.monotone_image fun _ _ => Finset.coe_subset.2
/-- Any theory with an infinite model has arbitrarily large models. -/
theorem exists_large_model_of_infinite_model (T : L.Theory) (κ : Cardinal.{w}) (M : Type w')
[L.Structure M] [M ⊨ T] [Infinite M] :
∃ N : ModelType.{_, _, max u v w} T, Cardinal.lift.{max u v w} κ ≤ #N := by
obtain ⟨N⟩ :=
isSatisfiable_union_distinctConstantsTheory_of_infinite T (Set.univ : Set κ.out) M
refine ⟨(N.is_model.mono Set.subset_union_left).bundled.reduct _, ?_⟩
haveI : N ⊨ distinctConstantsTheory _ _ := N.is_model.mono Set.subset_union_right
rw [ModelType.reduct_Carrier, coe_of]
refine _root_.trans (lift_le.2 (le_of_eq (Cardinal.mk_out κ).symm)) ?_
rw [← mk_univ]
refine
(card_le_of_model_distinctConstantsTheory L Set.univ N).trans (lift_le.{max u v w}.1 ?_)
rw [lift_lift]
theorem isSatisfiable_iUnion_iff_isSatisfiable_iUnion_finset {ι : Type*} (T : ι → L.Theory) :
IsSatisfiable (⋃ i, T i) ↔ ∀ s : Finset ι, IsSatisfiable (⋃ i ∈ s, T i) := by
classical
refine
⟨fun h s => h.mono (Set.iUnion_mono fun _ => Set.iUnion_subset_iff.2 fun _ => refl _),
fun h => ?_⟩
rw [isSatisfiable_iff_isFinitelySatisfiable]
intro s hs
rw [Set.iUnion_eq_iUnion_finset] at hs
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := Directed.exists_mem_subset_of_finset_subset_biUnion (by
exact Monotone.directed_le fun t1 t2 (h : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ t1 → x ∈ t2) =>
Set.iUnion_mono fun _ => Set.iUnion_mono' fun h1 => ⟨h h1, refl _⟩) hs
exact (h t).mono ht
end Theory
variable (L)
/-- A version of The Downward Löwenheim–Skolem theorem where the structure `N` elementarily embeds
into `M`, but is not by type a substructure of `M`, and thus can be chosen to belong to the universe
of the cardinal `κ`.
-/
theorem exists_elementaryEmbedding_card_eq_of_le (M : Type w') [L.Structure M] [Nonempty M]
(κ : Cardinal.{w}) (h1 : ℵ₀ ≤ κ) (h2 : lift.{w} L.card ≤ Cardinal.lift.{max u v} κ)
(h3 : lift.{w'} κ ≤ Cardinal.lift.{w} #M) :
∃ N : Bundled L.Structure, Nonempty (N ↪ₑ[L] M) ∧ #N = κ := by
obtain ⟨S, _, hS⟩ := exists_elementarySubstructure_card_eq L ∅ κ h1 (by simp) h2 h3
have : Small.{w} S := by
rw [← lift_inj.{_, w + 1}, lift_lift, lift_lift] at hS
exact small_iff_lift_mk_lt_univ.2 (lt_of_eq_of_lt hS κ.lift_lt_univ')
refine
⟨(equivShrink S).bundledInduced L,
⟨S.subtype.comp (Equiv.bundledInducedEquiv L _).symm.toElementaryEmbedding⟩,
lift_inj.1 (_root_.trans ?_ hS)⟩
simp only [Equiv.bundledInduced_α, lift_mk_shrink']
section
|
/-- The **Upward Löwenheim–Skolem Theorem**: If `κ` is a cardinal greater than the cardinalities of
`L` and an infinite `L`-structure `M`, then `M` has an elementary extension of cardinality `κ`. -/
theorem exists_elementaryEmbedding_card_eq_of_ge (M : Type w') [L.Structure M] [iM : Infinite M]
(κ : Cardinal.{w}) (h1 : Cardinal.lift.{w} L.card ≤ Cardinal.lift.{max u v} κ)
(h2 : Cardinal.lift.{w} #M ≤ Cardinal.lift.{w'} κ) :
∃ N : Bundled L.Structure, Nonempty (M ↪ₑ[L] N) ∧ #N = κ := by
obtain ⟨N0, hN0⟩ := (L.elementaryDiagram M).exists_large_model_of_infinite_model κ M
rw [← lift_le.{max u v}, lift_lift, lift_lift] at h2
obtain ⟨N, ⟨NN0⟩, hN⟩ :=
exists_elementaryEmbedding_card_eq_of_le (L[[M]]) N0 κ
(aleph0_le_lift.1 ((aleph0_le_lift.2 (aleph0_le_mk M)).trans h2))
(by
| Mathlib/ModelTheory/Satisfiability.lean | 212 | 224 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Adam Topaz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta, Adam Topaz
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.ConcreteCategory.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Endomorphism
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Skeletal
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Prod
/-!
# The category of finite types.
We define the category of finite types, denoted `FintypeCat` as
(bundled) types with a `Fintype` instance.
We also define `FintypeCat.Skeleton`, the standard skeleton of `FintypeCat` whose objects
are `Fin n` for `n : ℕ`. We prove that the obvious inclusion functor
`FintypeCat.Skeleton ⥤ FintypeCat` is an equivalence of categories in
`FintypeCat.Skeleton.equivalence`.
We prove that `FintypeCat.Skeleton` is a skeleton of `FintypeCat` in `FintypeCat.isSkeleton`.
-/
open CategoryTheory
/-- The category of finite types. -/
structure FintypeCat where
/-- The underlying type. -/
carrier : Type*
[str : Fintype carrier]
attribute [instance] FintypeCat.str
namespace FintypeCat
instance instCoeSort : CoeSort FintypeCat Type* :=
⟨carrier⟩
/-- Construct a bundled `FintypeCat` from the underlying type and typeclass. -/
abbrev of (X : Type*) [Fintype X] : FintypeCat where
carrier := X
instance : Inhabited FintypeCat :=
⟨of PEmpty⟩
instance {X : FintypeCat} : Fintype X :=
X.2
instance : Category FintypeCat :=
InducedCategory.category carrier
/-- The fully faithful embedding of `FintypeCat` into the category of types. -/
@[simps!]
def incl : FintypeCat ⥤ Type* :=
inducedFunctor _
instance : incl.Full := InducedCategory.full _
instance : incl.Faithful := InducedCategory.faithful _
instance (X Y : FintypeCat) : FunLike (X ⟶ Y) X Y where
coe f := f
coe_injective' _ _ h := h
instance concreteCategoryFintype : ConcreteCategory FintypeCat (· ⟶ ·) where
hom f := f
ofHom f := f
/- Help typeclass inference infer fullness of forgetful functor. -/
instance : (forget FintypeCat).Full := inferInstanceAs <| FintypeCat.incl.Full
@[simp]
theorem id_apply (X : FintypeCat) (x : X) : (𝟙 X : X → X) x = x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply {X Y Z : FintypeCat} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (x : X) : (f ≫ g) x = g (f x) :=
rfl
-- Isn't `@[simp]` because `simp` can prove it after importing `Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Elementwise`.
lemma hom_inv_id_apply {X Y : FintypeCat} (f : X ≅ Y) (x : X) : f.inv (f.hom x) = x :=
congr_fun f.hom_inv_id x
-- Isn't `@[simp]` because `simp` can prove it after importing `Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Elementwise`.
lemma inv_hom_id_apply {X Y : FintypeCat} (f : X ≅ Y) (y : Y) : f.hom (f.inv y) = y :=
congr_fun f.inv_hom_id y
@[ext]
lemma hom_ext {X Y : FintypeCat} (f g : X ⟶ Y) (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g := by
funext
apply h
-- See `equivEquivIso` in the root namespace for the analogue in `Type`.
/-- Equivalences between finite types are the same as isomorphisms in `FintypeCat`. -/
@[simps]
def equivEquivIso {A B : FintypeCat} : A ≃ B ≃ (A ≅ B) where
| toFun e :=
{ hom := e
inv := e.symm }
invFun i :=
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/FintypeCat.lean | 96 | 99 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Lattice
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Tower
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Support
import Mathlib.Algebra.Regular.Pow
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Antidiagonal
import Mathlib.Order.SymmDiff
/-!
# Multivariate polynomials
This file defines polynomial rings over a base ring (or even semiring),
with variables from a general type `σ` (which could be infinite).
## Important definitions
Let `R` be a commutative ring (or a semiring) and let `σ` be an arbitrary
type. This file creates the type `MvPolynomial σ R`, which mathematicians
might denote $R[X_i : i \in σ]$. It is the type of multivariate
(a.k.a. multivariable) polynomials, with variables
corresponding to the terms in `σ`, and coefficients in `R`.
### Notation
In the definitions below, we use the following notation:
+ `σ : Type*` (indexing the variables)
+ `R : Type*` `[CommSemiring R]` (the coefficients)
+ `s : σ →₀ ℕ`, a function from `σ` to `ℕ` which is zero away from a finite set.
This will give rise to a monomial in `MvPolynomial σ R` which mathematicians might call `X^s`
+ `a : R`
+ `i : σ`, with corresponding monomial `X i`, often denoted `X_i` by mathematicians
+ `p : MvPolynomial σ R`
### Definitions
* `MvPolynomial σ R` : the type of polynomials with variables of type `σ` and coefficients
in the commutative semiring `R`
* `monomial s a` : the monomial which mathematically would be denoted `a * X^s`
* `C a` : the constant polynomial with value `a`
* `X i` : the degree one monomial corresponding to i; mathematically this might be denoted `Xᵢ`.
* `coeff s p` : the coefficient of `s` in `p`.
## Implementation notes
Recall that if `Y` has a zero, then `X →₀ Y` is the type of functions from `X` to `Y` with finite
support, i.e. such that only finitely many elements of `X` get sent to non-zero terms in `Y`.
The definition of `MvPolynomial σ R` is `(σ →₀ ℕ) →₀ R`; here `σ →₀ ℕ` denotes the space of all
monomials in the variables, and the function to `R` sends a monomial to its coefficient in
the polynomial being represented.
## Tags
polynomial, multivariate polynomial, multivariable polynomial
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
open scoped Pointwise
universe u v w x
variable {R : Type u} {S₁ : Type v} {S₂ : Type w} {S₃ : Type x}
/-- Multivariate polynomial, where `σ` is the index set of the variables and
`R` is the coefficient ring -/
def MvPolynomial (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] :=
AddMonoidAlgebra R (σ →₀ ℕ)
namespace MvPolynomial
-- Porting note: because of `MvPolynomial.C` and `MvPolynomial.X` this linter throws
-- tons of warnings in this file, and it's easier to just disable them globally in the file
variable {σ : Type*} {a a' a₁ a₂ : R} {e : ℕ} {n m : σ} {s : σ →₀ ℕ}
section CommSemiring
section Instances
instance decidableEqMvPolynomial [CommSemiring R] [DecidableEq σ] [DecidableEq R] :
DecidableEq (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Finsupp.instDecidableEq
instance commSemiring [CommSemiring R] : CommSemiring (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.commSemiring
instance inhabited [CommSemiring R] : Inhabited (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
⟨0⟩
instance distribuMulAction [Monoid R] [CommSemiring S₁] [DistribMulAction R S₁] :
DistribMulAction R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.distribMulAction
instance smulZeroClass [CommSemiring S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₁] :
SMulZeroClass R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.smulZeroClass
instance faithfulSMul [CommSemiring S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₁] [FaithfulSMul R S₁] :
FaithfulSMul R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.faithfulSMul
instance module [Semiring R] [CommSemiring S₁] [Module R S₁] : Module R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.module
instance isScalarTower [CommSemiring S₂] [SMul R S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ S₂]
[IsScalarTower R S₁ S₂] : IsScalarTower R S₁ (MvPolynomial σ S₂) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.isScalarTower
instance smulCommClass [CommSemiring S₂] [SMulZeroClass R S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ S₂]
[SMulCommClass R S₁ S₂] : SMulCommClass R S₁ (MvPolynomial σ S₂) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.smulCommClass
instance isCentralScalar [CommSemiring S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₁] [SMulZeroClass Rᵐᵒᵖ S₁]
[IsCentralScalar R S₁] : IsCentralScalar R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.isCentralScalar
instance algebra [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S₁] [Algebra R S₁] :
Algebra R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.algebra
instance isScalarTower_right [CommSemiring S₁] [DistribSMul R S₁] [IsScalarTower R S₁ S₁] :
IsScalarTower R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.isScalarTower_self _
instance smulCommClass_right [CommSemiring S₁] [DistribSMul R S₁] [SMulCommClass R S₁ S₁] :
SMulCommClass R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.smulCommClass_self _
/-- If `R` is a subsingleton, then `MvPolynomial σ R` has a unique element -/
instance unique [CommSemiring R] [Subsingleton R] : Unique (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.unique
end Instances
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S₁] {p q : MvPolynomial σ R}
/-- `monomial s a` is the monomial with coefficient `a` and exponents given by `s` -/
def monomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] MvPolynomial σ R :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.lsingle s
theorem one_def : (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = monomial 0 1 := rfl
theorem single_eq_monomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) : Finsupp.single s a = monomial s a :=
rfl
theorem mul_def : p * q = p.sum fun m a => q.sum fun n b => monomial (m + n) (a * b) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_def
/-- `C a` is the constant polynomial with value `a` -/
def C : R →+* MvPolynomial σ R :=
{ singleZeroRingHom with toFun := monomial 0 }
variable (R σ)
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_eq : algebraMap R (MvPolynomial σ R) = C :=
rfl
variable {R σ}
/-- `X n` is the degree `1` monomial $X_n$. -/
def X (n : σ) : MvPolynomial σ R :=
monomial (Finsupp.single n 1) 1
theorem monomial_left_injective {r : R} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
Function.Injective fun s : σ →₀ ℕ => monomial s r :=
Finsupp.single_left_injective hr
@[simp]
theorem monomial_left_inj {s t : σ →₀ ℕ} {r : R} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
monomial s r = monomial t r ↔ s = t :=
Finsupp.single_left_inj hr
theorem C_apply : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = monomial 0 a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem C_0 : C 0 = (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) := map_zero _
@[simp]
theorem C_1 : C 1 = (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) :=
rfl
theorem C_mul_monomial : C a * monomial s a' = monomial s (a * a') := by
-- Porting note: this `show` feels like defeq abuse, but I can't find the appropriate lemmas
show AddMonoidAlgebra.single _ _ * AddMonoidAlgebra.single _ _ = AddMonoidAlgebra.single _ _
simp [C_apply, single_mul_single]
@[simp]
theorem C_add : (C (a + a') : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a + C a' :=
Finsupp.single_add _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem C_mul : (C (a * a') : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a * C a' :=
C_mul_monomial.symm
@[simp]
theorem C_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) : (C (a ^ n) : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a ^ n :=
map_pow _ _ _
theorem C_injective (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] :
Function.Injective (C : R → MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Finsupp.single_injective _
theorem C_surjective {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (σ : Type*) [IsEmpty σ] :
Function.Surjective (C : R → MvPolynomial σ R) := by
refine fun p => ⟨p.toFun 0, Finsupp.ext fun a => ?_⟩
simp only [C_apply, ← single_eq_monomial, (Finsupp.ext isEmptyElim (α := σ) : a = 0),
single_eq_same]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem C_inj {σ : Type*} (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] (r s : R) :
(C r : MvPolynomial σ R) = C s ↔ r = s :=
(C_injective σ R).eq_iff
@[simp] lemma C_eq_zero : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by rw [← map_zero C, C_inj]
lemma C_ne_zero : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
C_eq_zero.ne
instance nontrivial_of_nontrivial (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Nontrivial R] :
Nontrivial (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
inferInstanceAs (Nontrivial <| AddMonoidAlgebra R (σ →₀ ℕ))
instance infinite_of_infinite (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Infinite R] :
Infinite (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Infinite.of_injective C (C_injective _ _)
instance infinite_of_nonempty (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [Nonempty σ] [CommSemiring R]
[Nontrivial R] : Infinite (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Infinite.of_injective ((fun s : σ →₀ ℕ => monomial s 1) ∘ Finsupp.single (Classical.arbitrary σ))
<| (monomial_left_injective one_ne_zero).comp (Finsupp.single_injective _)
theorem C_eq_coe_nat (n : ℕ) : (C ↑n : MvPolynomial σ R) = n := by
induction n <;> simp [*]
theorem C_mul' : MvPolynomial.C a * p = a • p :=
(Algebra.smul_def a p).symm
theorem smul_eq_C_mul (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (a : R) : a • p = C a * p :=
C_mul'.symm
theorem C_eq_smul_one : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = a • (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) := by
rw [← C_mul', mul_one]
theorem smul_monomial {S₁ : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] (r : S₁) :
r • monomial s a = monomial s (r • a) :=
Finsupp.smul_single _ _ _
theorem X_injective [Nontrivial R] : Function.Injective (X : σ → MvPolynomial σ R) :=
(monomial_left_injective one_ne_zero).comp (Finsupp.single_left_injective one_ne_zero)
@[simp]
theorem X_inj [Nontrivial R] (m n : σ) : X m = (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) ↔ m = n :=
X_injective.eq_iff
theorem monomial_pow : monomial s a ^ e = monomial (e • s) (a ^ e) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.single_pow e
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul {s s' : σ →₀ ℕ} {a b : R} :
monomial s a * monomial s' b = monomial (s + s') (a * b) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_single
variable (σ R)
/-- `fun s ↦ monomial s 1` as a homomorphism. -/
def monomialOneHom : Multiplicative (σ →₀ ℕ) →* MvPolynomial σ R :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.of _ _
variable {σ R}
@[simp]
theorem monomialOneHom_apply : monomialOneHom R σ s = (monomial s 1 : MvPolynomial σ R) :=
rfl
theorem X_pow_eq_monomial : X n ^ e = monomial (Finsupp.single n e) (1 : R) := by
simp [X, monomial_pow]
theorem monomial_add_single : monomial (s + Finsupp.single n e) a = monomial s a * X n ^ e := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, monomial_mul, mul_one]
theorem monomial_single_add : monomial (Finsupp.single n e + s) a = X n ^ e * monomial s a := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, monomial_mul, one_mul]
theorem C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial {s : σ} {a : R} {n : ℕ} :
C a * X s ^ n = monomial (Finsupp.single s n) a := by
rw [← zero_add (Finsupp.single s n), monomial_add_single, C_apply]
theorem C_mul_X_eq_monomial {s : σ} {a : R} : C a * X s = monomial (Finsupp.single s 1) a := by
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, pow_one]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero {s : σ →₀ ℕ} : monomial s (0 : R) = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_zero _
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero' : (monomial (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) : R → MvPolynomial σ R) = C :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem monomial_eq_zero {s : σ →₀ ℕ} {b : R} : monomial s b = 0 ↔ b = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem sum_monomial_eq {A : Type*} [AddCommMonoid A] {u : σ →₀ ℕ} {r : R} {b : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R → A}
(w : b u 0 = 0) : sum (monomial u r) b = b u r :=
Finsupp.sum_single_index w
@[simp]
theorem sum_C {A : Type*} [AddCommMonoid A] {b : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R → A} (w : b 0 0 = 0) :
sum (C a) b = b 0 a :=
sum_monomial_eq w
theorem monomial_sum_one {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → σ →₀ ℕ) :
(monomial (∑ i ∈ s, f i) 1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = ∏ i ∈ s, monomial (f i) 1 :=
map_prod (monomialOneHom R σ) (fun i => Multiplicative.ofAdd (f i)) s
theorem monomial_sum_index {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) :
monomial (∑ i ∈ s, f i) a = C a * ∏ i ∈ s, monomial (f i) 1 := by
rw [← monomial_sum_one, C_mul', ← (monomial _).map_smul, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
theorem monomial_finsupp_sum_index {α β : Type*} [Zero β] (f : α →₀ β) (g : α → β → σ →₀ ℕ)
(a : R) : monomial (f.sum g) a = C a * f.prod fun a b => monomial (g a b) 1 :=
monomial_sum_index _ _ _
theorem monomial_eq_monomial_iff {α : Type*} (a₁ a₂ : α →₀ ℕ) (b₁ b₂ : R) :
monomial a₁ b₁ = monomial a₂ b₂ ↔ a₁ = a₂ ∧ b₁ = b₂ ∨ b₁ = 0 ∧ b₂ = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_eq_single_iff _ _ _ _
theorem monomial_eq : monomial s a = C a * (s.prod fun n e => X n ^ e : MvPolynomial σ R) := by
simp only [X_pow_eq_monomial, ← monomial_finsupp_sum_index, Finsupp.sum_single]
@[simp]
lemma prod_X_pow_eq_monomial : ∏ x ∈ s.support, X x ^ s x = monomial s (1 : R) := by
simp only [monomial_eq, map_one, one_mul, Finsupp.prod]
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on_monomial {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop}
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(mul_X : ∀ p n, motive p → motive (p * X n)) : ∀ s a, motive (monomial s a) := by
intro s a
apply @Finsupp.induction σ ℕ _ _ s
· show motive (monomial 0 a)
exact C a
· intro n e p _hpn _he ih
have : ∀ e : ℕ, motive (monomial p a * X n ^ e) := by
intro e
induction e with
| zero => simp [ih]
| succ e e_ih => simp [ih, pow_succ, (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, mul_X, e_ih]
simp [add_comm, monomial_add_single, this]
/-- Analog of `Polynomial.induction_on'`.
To prove something about mv_polynomials,
it suffices to show the condition is closed under taking sums,
and it holds for monomials. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on' {P : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(monomial : ∀ (u : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R), P (monomial u a))
(add : ∀ p q : MvPolynomial σ R, P p → P q → P (p + q)) : P p :=
Finsupp.induction p
(suffices P (MvPolynomial.monomial 0 0) by rwa [monomial_zero] at this
show P (MvPolynomial.monomial 0 0) from monomial 0 0)
fun _ _ _ _ha _hb hPf => add _ _ (monomial _ _) hPf
/--
Similar to `MvPolynomial.induction_on` but only a weak form of `h_add` is required.
In particular, this version only requires us to show
that `motive` is closed under addition of nontrivial monomials not present in the support.
-/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem monomial_add_induction_on {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(monomial_add :
∀ (a : σ →₀ ℕ) (b : R) (f : MvPolynomial σ R),
a ∉ f.support → b ≠ 0 → motive f → motive ((monomial a b) + f)) :
motive p :=
Finsupp.induction p (C_0.rec <| C 0) monomial_add
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias induction_on''' := monomial_add_induction_on
/--
Similar to `MvPolynomial.induction_on` but only a yet weaker form of `h_add` is required.
In particular, this version only requires us to show
that `motive` is closed under addition of monomials not present in the support
for which `motive` is already known to hold.
-/
theorem induction_on'' {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(monomial_add :
∀ (a : σ →₀ ℕ) (b : R) (f : MvPolynomial σ R),
a ∉ f.support → b ≠ 0 → motive f → motive (monomial a b) →
motive ((monomial a b) + f))
(mul_X : ∀ (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (n : σ), motive p → motive (p * MvPolynomial.X n)) :
motive p :=
monomial_add_induction_on p C fun a b f ha hb hf =>
monomial_add a b f ha hb hf <| induction_on_monomial C mul_X a b
/--
Analog of `Polynomial.induction_on`.
If a property holds for any constant polynomial
and is preserved under addition and multiplication by variables
then it holds for all multivariate polynomials.
-/
@[recursor 5]
theorem induction_on {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(add : ∀ p q, motive p → motive q → motive (p + q))
(mul_X : ∀ p n, motive p → motive (p * X n)) : motive p :=
induction_on'' p C (fun a b f _ha _hb hf hm => add (monomial a b) f hm hf) mul_X
theorem ringHom_ext {A : Type*} [Semiring A] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →+* A}
(hC : ∀ r, f (C r) = g (C r)) (hX : ∀ i, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g := by
refine AddMonoidAlgebra.ringHom_ext' ?_ ?_
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): this has high priority, but Lean still chooses `RingHom.ext`, why?
-- probably because of the type synonym
· ext x
exact hC _
· apply Finsupp.mulHom_ext'; intros x
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): `Finsupp.mulHom_ext'` needs to have increased priority
apply MonoidHom.ext_mnat
exact hX _
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext 1100]
theorem ringHom_ext' {A : Type*} [Semiring A] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →+* A}
(hC : f.comp C = g.comp C) (hX : ∀ i, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g :=
ringHom_ext (RingHom.ext_iff.1 hC) hX
theorem hom_eq_hom [Semiring S₂] (f g : MvPolynomial σ R →+* S₂) (hC : f.comp C = g.comp C)
(hX : ∀ n : σ, f (X n) = g (X n)) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : f p = g p :=
RingHom.congr_fun (ringHom_ext' hC hX) p
theorem is_id (f : MvPolynomial σ R →+* MvPolynomial σ R) (hC : f.comp C = C)
(hX : ∀ n : σ, f (X n) = X n) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : f p = p :=
hom_eq_hom f (RingHom.id _) hC hX p
@[ext 1100]
theorem algHom_ext' {A B : Type*} [CommSemiring A] [CommSemiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
{f g : MvPolynomial σ A →ₐ[R] B}
(h₁ :
f.comp (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R A (MvPolynomial σ A)) =
g.comp (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R A (MvPolynomial σ A)))
(h₂ : ∀ i, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g :=
AlgHom.coe_ringHom_injective (MvPolynomial.ringHom_ext' (congr_arg AlgHom.toRingHom h₁) h₂)
@[ext 1200]
theorem algHom_ext {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →ₐ[R] A}
(hf : ∀ i : σ, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.algHom_ext' (mulHom_ext' fun X : σ => MonoidHom.ext_mnat (hf X))
@[simp]
theorem algHom_C {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] (f : MvPolynomial σ R →ₐ[R] A) (r : R) :
f (C r) = algebraMap R A r :=
f.commutes r
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_range_X : Algebra.adjoin R (range (X : σ → MvPolynomial σ R)) = ⊤ := by
set S := Algebra.adjoin R (range (X : σ → MvPolynomial σ R))
refine top_unique fun p hp => ?_; clear hp
induction p using MvPolynomial.induction_on with
| C => exact S.algebraMap_mem _
| add p q hp hq => exact S.add_mem hp hq
| mul_X p i hp => exact S.mul_mem hp (Algebra.subset_adjoin <| mem_range_self _)
@[ext]
theorem linearMap_ext {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →ₗ[R] M}
(h : ∀ s, f ∘ₗ monomial s = g ∘ₗ monomial s) : f = g :=
Finsupp.lhom_ext' h
section Support
/-- The finite set of all `m : σ →₀ ℕ` such that `X^m` has a non-zero coefficient. -/
def support (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Finset (σ →₀ ℕ) :=
Finsupp.support p
theorem finsupp_support_eq_support (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Finsupp.support p = p.support :=
rfl
theorem support_monomial [h : Decidable (a = 0)] :
(monomial s a).support = if a = 0 then ∅ else {s} := by
rw [← Subsingleton.elim (Classical.decEq R a 0) h]
rfl
theorem support_monomial_subset : (monomial s a).support ⊆ {s} :=
support_single_subset
theorem support_add [DecidableEq σ] : (p + q).support ⊆ p.support ∪ q.support :=
Finsupp.support_add
theorem support_X [Nontrivial R] : (X n : MvPolynomial σ R).support = {Finsupp.single n 1} := by
classical rw [X, support_monomial, if_neg]; exact one_ne_zero
theorem support_X_pow [Nontrivial R] (s : σ) (n : ℕ) :
(X s ^ n : MvPolynomial σ R).support = {Finsupp.single s n} := by
classical
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, support_monomial, if_neg (one_ne_zero' R)]
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : (0 : MvPolynomial σ R).support = ∅ :=
rfl
theorem support_smul {S₁ : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] {a : S₁} {f : MvPolynomial σ R} :
(a • f).support ⊆ f.support :=
Finsupp.support_smul
theorem support_sum {α : Type*} [DecidableEq σ] {s : Finset α} {f : α → MvPolynomial σ R} :
(∑ x ∈ s, f x).support ⊆ s.biUnion fun x => (f x).support :=
Finsupp.support_finset_sum
end Support
section Coeff
/-- The coefficient of the monomial `m` in the multi-variable polynomial `p`. -/
def coeff (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : R :=
@DFunLike.coe ((σ →₀ ℕ) →₀ R) _ _ _ p m
@[simp]
theorem mem_support_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {m : σ →₀ ℕ} : m ∈ p.support ↔ p.coeff m ≠ 0 := by
simp [support, coeff]
theorem not_mem_support_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {m : σ →₀ ℕ} : m ∉ p.support ↔ p.coeff m = 0 :=
by simp
theorem sum_def {A} [AddCommMonoid A] {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {b : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R → A} :
p.sum b = ∑ m ∈ p.support, b m (p.coeff m) := by simp [support, Finsupp.sum, coeff]
theorem support_mul [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(p * q).support ⊆ p.support + q.support :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.support_mul p q
@[ext]
theorem ext (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) : (∀ m, coeff m p = coeff m q) → p = q :=
Finsupp.ext
@[simp]
theorem coeff_add (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) : coeff m (p + q) = coeff m p + coeff m q :=
add_apply p q m
@[simp]
theorem coeff_smul {S₁ : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (C : S₁) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (C • p) = C • coeff m p :=
smul_apply C p m
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero (m : σ →₀ ℕ) : coeff m (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_X (i : σ) : coeff 0 (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 :=
single_eq_of_ne fun h => by cases Finsupp.single_eq_zero.1 h
/-- `MvPolynomial.coeff m` but promoted to an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def coeffAddMonoidHom (m : σ →₀ ℕ) : MvPolynomial σ R →+ R where
toFun := coeff m
map_zero' := coeff_zero m
map_add' := coeff_add m
variable (R) in
/-- `MvPolynomial.coeff m` but promoted to a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def lcoeff (m : σ →₀ ℕ) : MvPolynomial σ R →ₗ[R] R where
toFun := coeff m
map_add' := coeff_add m
map_smul' := coeff_smul m
theorem coeff_sum {X : Type*} (s : Finset X) (f : X → MvPolynomial σ R) (m : σ →₀ ℕ) :
coeff m (∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∑ x ∈ s, coeff m (f x) :=
map_sum (@coeffAddMonoidHom R σ _ _) _ s
theorem monic_monomial_eq (m) :
monomial m (1 : R) = (m.prod fun n e => X n ^ e : MvPolynomial σ R) := by simp [monomial_eq]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial [DecidableEq σ] (m n) (a) :
coeff m (monomial n a : MvPolynomial σ R) = if n = m then a else 0 :=
Finsupp.single_apply
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C [DecidableEq σ] (m) (a) :
coeff m (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = if 0 = m then a else 0 :=
Finsupp.single_apply
lemma eq_C_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty σ] (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p = C (p.coeff 0) := by
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := C_surjective σ p
simp
theorem coeff_one [DecidableEq σ] (m) : coeff m (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = if 0 = m then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_C m 1
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_C (a) : coeff 0 (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = a :=
single_eq_same
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_one : coeff 0 (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 1 :=
coeff_zero_C 1
theorem coeff_X_pow [DecidableEq σ] (i : σ) (m) (k : ℕ) :
coeff m (X i ^ k : MvPolynomial σ R) = if Finsupp.single i k = m then 1 else 0 := by
have := coeff_monomial m (Finsupp.single i k) (1 : R)
rwa [@monomial_eq _ _ (1 : R) (Finsupp.single i k) _, C_1, one_mul, Finsupp.prod_single_index]
at this
exact pow_zero _
theorem coeff_X' [DecidableEq σ] (i : σ) (m) :
coeff m (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = if Finsupp.single i 1 = m then 1 else 0 := by
rw [← coeff_X_pow, pow_one]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X (i : σ) : coeff (Finsupp.single i 1) (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = 1 := by
classical rw [coeff_X', if_pos rfl]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C_mul (m) (a : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : coeff m (C a * p) = a * coeff m p := by
classical
rw [mul_def, sum_C]
· simp +contextual [sum_def, coeff_sum]
simp
theorem coeff_mul [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) (n : σ →₀ ℕ) :
coeff n (p * q) = ∑ x ∈ Finset.antidiagonal n, coeff x.1 p * coeff x.2 q :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_apply_antidiagonal p q _ _ Finset.mem_antidiagonal
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mul_monomial (m) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff (m + s) (p * monomial s r) = coeff m p * r :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_single_apply_aux p _ _ _ _ fun _a _ => add_left_inj _
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_mul (m) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff (s + m) (monomial s r * p) = r * coeff m p :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_apply_aux p _ _ _ _ fun _a _ => add_right_inj _
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mul_X (m) (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff (m + Finsupp.single s 1) (p * X s) = coeff m p :=
(coeff_mul_monomial _ _ _ _).trans (mul_one _)
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_mul (m) (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff (Finsupp.single s 1 + m) (X s * p) = coeff m p :=
(coeff_monomial_mul _ _ _ _).trans (one_mul _)
lemma coeff_single_X_pow [DecidableEq σ] (s s' : σ) (n n' : ℕ) :
(X (R := R) s ^ n).coeff (Finsupp.single s' n')
= if s = s' ∧ n = n' ∨ n = 0 ∧ n' = 0 then 1 else 0 := by
simp only [coeff_X_pow, single_eq_single_iff]
@[simp]
lemma coeff_single_X [DecidableEq σ] (s s' : σ) (n : ℕ) :
(X s).coeff (R := R) (Finsupp.single s' n) = if n = 1 ∧ s = s' then 1 else 0 := by
simpa [eq_comm, and_comm] using coeff_single_X_pow s s' 1 n
@[simp]
theorem support_mul_X (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(p * X s).support = p.support.map (addRightEmbedding (Finsupp.single s 1)) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.support_mul_single p _ (by simp) _
@[simp]
theorem support_X_mul (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(X s * p).support = p.support.map (addLeftEmbedding (Finsupp.single s 1)) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.support_single_mul p _ (by simp) _
@[simp]
theorem support_smul_eq {S₁ : Type*} [Semiring S₁] [Module S₁ R] [NoZeroSMulDivisors S₁ R] {a : S₁}
(h : a ≠ 0) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : (a • p).support = p.support :=
Finsupp.support_smul_eq h
theorem support_sdiff_support_subset_support_add [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p.support \ q.support ⊆ (p + q).support := by
intro m hm
simp only [Classical.not_not, mem_support_iff, Finset.mem_sdiff, Ne] at hm
simp [hm.2, hm.1]
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem support_symmDiff_support_subset_support_add [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p.support ∆ q.support ⊆ (p + q).support := by
rw [symmDiff_def, Finset.sup_eq_union]
apply Finset.union_subset
· exact support_sdiff_support_subset_support_add p q
· rw [add_comm]
exact support_sdiff_support_subset_support_add q p
theorem coeff_mul_monomial' (m) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (p * monomial s r) = if s ≤ m then coeff (m - s) p * r else 0 := by
classical
split_ifs with h
· conv_rhs => rw [← coeff_mul_monomial _ s]
congr with t
rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le h]
· contrapose! h
rw [← mem_support_iff] at h
obtain ⟨j, -, rfl⟩ : ∃ j ∈ support p, j + s = m := by
simpa [Finset.mem_add]
using Finset.add_subset_add_left support_monomial_subset <| support_mul _ _ h
exact le_add_left le_rfl
theorem coeff_monomial_mul' (m) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (monomial s r * p) = if s ≤ m then r * coeff (m - s) p else 0 := by
-- note that if we allow `R` to be non-commutative we will have to duplicate the proof above.
rw [mul_comm, mul_comm r]
exact coeff_mul_monomial' _ _ _ _
theorem coeff_mul_X' [DecidableEq σ] (m) (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (p * X s) = if s ∈ m.support then coeff (m - Finsupp.single s 1) p else 0 := by
refine (coeff_mul_monomial' _ _ _ _).trans ?_
simp_rw [Finsupp.single_le_iff, Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Nat.succ_le_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero,
mul_one]
theorem coeff_X_mul' [DecidableEq σ] (m) (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (X s * p) = if s ∈ m.support then coeff (m - Finsupp.single s 1) p else 0 := by
refine (coeff_monomial_mul' _ _ _ _).trans ?_
simp_rw [Finsupp.single_le_iff, Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Nat.succ_le_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero,
one_mul]
theorem eq_zero_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} : p = 0 ↔ ∀ d, coeff d p = 0 := by
rw [MvPolynomial.ext_iff]
simp only [coeff_zero]
theorem ne_zero_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} : p ≠ 0 ↔ ∃ d, coeff d p ≠ 0 := by
rw [Ne, eq_zero_iff]
push_neg
rfl
@[simp]
theorem X_ne_zero [Nontrivial R] (s : σ) :
X (R := R) s ≠ 0 := by
rw [ne_zero_iff]
use Finsupp.single s 1
simp only [coeff_X, ne_eq, one_ne_zero, not_false_eq_true]
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty {p : MvPolynomial σ R} : p.support = ∅ ↔ p = 0 :=
Finsupp.support_eq_empty
@[simp]
lemma support_nonempty {p : MvPolynomial σ R} : p.support.Nonempty ↔ p ≠ 0 := by
rw [Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty, ne_eq, support_eq_empty]
theorem exists_coeff_ne_zero {p : MvPolynomial σ R} (h : p ≠ 0) : ∃ d, coeff d p ≠ 0 :=
ne_zero_iff.mp h
theorem C_dvd_iff_dvd_coeff (r : R) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) : C r ∣ φ ↔ ∀ i, r ∣ φ.coeff i := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨φ, rfl⟩ c
rw [coeff_C_mul]
apply dvd_mul_right
· intro h
choose C hc using h
classical
let c' : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R := fun i => if i ∈ φ.support then C i else 0
let ψ : MvPolynomial σ R := ∑ i ∈ φ.support, monomial i (c' i)
use ψ
apply MvPolynomial.ext
intro i
simp only [ψ, c', coeff_C_mul, coeff_sum, coeff_monomial, Finset.sum_ite_eq']
split_ifs with hi
· rw [hc]
· rw [not_mem_support_iff] at hi
rwa [mul_zero]
@[simp] lemma isRegular_X : IsRegular (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) := by
suffices IsLeftRegular (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) from
⟨this, this.right_of_commute <| Commute.all _⟩
intro P Q (hPQ : (X n) * P = (X n) * Q)
ext i
rw [← coeff_X_mul i n P, hPQ, coeff_X_mul i n Q]
@[simp] lemma isRegular_X_pow (k : ℕ) : IsRegular (X n ^ k : MvPolynomial σ R) := isRegular_X.pow k
@[simp] lemma isRegular_prod_X (s : Finset σ) :
IsRegular (∏ n ∈ s, X n : MvPolynomial σ R) :=
IsRegular.prod fun _ _ ↦ isRegular_X
/-- The finset of nonzero coefficients of a multivariate polynomial. -/
def coeffs (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Finset R :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
Finset.image p.coeff p.support
@[simp]
lemma coeffs_zero : coeffs (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) = ∅ :=
rfl
lemma coeffs_one : coeffs (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) ⊆ {1} := by
classical
rw [coeffs, Finset.image_subset_iff]
simp_all [coeff_one]
@[nontriviality]
lemma coeffs_eq_empty_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton R] (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : p.coeffs = ∅ := by
simpa [coeffs] using Subsingleton.eq_zero p
@[simp]
lemma coeffs_one_of_nontrivial [Nontrivial R] : coeffs (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = {1} := by
apply Finset.Subset.antisymm coeffs_one
simp only [coeffs, Finset.singleton_subset_iff, Finset.mem_image]
exact ⟨0, by simp⟩
lemma mem_coeffs_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {c : R} :
c ∈ p.coeffs ↔ ∃ n ∈ p.support, c = p.coeff n := by
simp [coeffs, eq_comm, (Finset.mem_image)]
lemma coeff_mem_coeffs {p : MvPolynomial σ R} (m : σ →₀ ℕ)
(h : p.coeff m ≠ 0) : p.coeff m ∈ p.coeffs :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
Finset.mem_image_of_mem p.coeff (mem_support_iff.mpr h)
lemma zero_not_mem_coeffs (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : 0 ∉ p.coeffs := by
intro hz
obtain ⟨n, hnsupp, hn⟩ := mem_coeffs_iff.mp hz
exact (mem_support_iff.mp hnsupp) hn.symm
end Coeff
section ConstantCoeff
/-- `constantCoeff p` returns the constant term of the polynomial `p`, defined as `coeff 0 p`.
This is a ring homomorphism.
-/
def constantCoeff : MvPolynomial σ R →+* R where
toFun := coeff 0
map_one' := by simp [AddMonoidAlgebra.one_def]
map_mul' := by classical simp [coeff_mul, Finsupp.support_single_ne_zero]
map_zero' := coeff_zero _
map_add' := coeff_add _
theorem constantCoeff_eq : (constantCoeff : MvPolynomial σ R → R) = coeff 0 :=
rfl
variable (σ) in
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_C (r : R) : constantCoeff (C r : MvPolynomial σ R) = r := by
classical simp [constantCoeff_eq]
variable (R) in
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_X (i : σ) : constantCoeff (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 := by
simp [constantCoeff_eq]
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_smul {R : Type*} [SMulZeroClass R S₁] (a : R) (f : MvPolynomial σ S₁) :
constantCoeff (a • f) = a • constantCoeff f :=
rfl
theorem constantCoeff_monomial [DecidableEq σ] (d : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) :
constantCoeff (monomial d r) = if d = 0 then r else 0 := by
rw [constantCoeff_eq, coeff_monomial]
variable (σ R)
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_comp_C : constantCoeff.comp (C : R →+* MvPolynomial σ R) = RingHom.id R := by
ext x
exact constantCoeff_C σ x
theorem constantCoeff_comp_algebraMap :
constantCoeff.comp (algebraMap R (MvPolynomial σ R)) = RingHom.id R :=
constantCoeff_comp_C _ _
end ConstantCoeff
section AsSum
@[simp]
theorem support_sum_monomial_coeff (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(∑ v ∈ p.support, monomial v (coeff v p)) = p :=
Finsupp.sum_single p
theorem as_sum (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : p = ∑ v ∈ p.support, monomial v (coeff v p) :=
(support_sum_monomial_coeff p).symm
end AsSum
section coeffsIn
variable {R S σ : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
section Module
variable [Module R S] {M N : Submodule R S} {p : MvPolynomial σ S} {s : σ} {i : σ →₀ ℕ} {x : S}
{n : ℕ}
variable (σ M) in
/-- The `R`-submodule of multivariate polynomials whose coefficients lie in a `R`-submodule `M`. -/
@[simps]
def coeffsIn : Submodule R (MvPolynomial σ S) where
carrier := {p | ∀ i, p.coeff i ∈ M}
add_mem' := by simp+contextual [add_mem]
zero_mem' := by simp
smul_mem' := by simp+contextual [Submodule.smul_mem]
lemma mem_coeffsIn : p ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ ∀ i, p.coeff i ∈ M := .rfl
@[simp]
lemma monomial_mem_coeffsIn : monomial i x ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ x ∈ M := by
classical
simp only [mem_coeffsIn, coeff_monomial]
exact ⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using h i, fun hs j ↦ by split <;> simp [hs]⟩
@[simp]
lemma C_mem_coeffsIn : C x ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ x ∈ M := by simpa using monomial_mem_coeffsIn (i := 0)
@[simp]
lemma one_coeffsIn : 1 ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ 1 ∈ M := by simpa using C_mem_coeffsIn (x := (1 : S))
@[simp]
lemma mul_monomial_mem_coeffsIn : p * monomial i 1 ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ p ∈ coeffsIn σ M := by
classical
simp only [mem_coeffsIn, coeff_mul_monomial', Finsupp.mem_support_iff]
constructor
· rintro hp j
simpa using hp (j + i)
· rintro hp i
split <;> simp [hp]
@[simp]
lemma monomial_mul_mem_coeffsIn : monomial i 1 * p ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ p ∈ coeffsIn σ M := by
simp [mul_comm]
@[simp]
lemma mul_X_mem_coeffsIn : p * X s ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ p ∈ coeffsIn σ M := by
simpa [-mul_monomial_mem_coeffsIn] using mul_monomial_mem_coeffsIn (i := .single s 1)
@[simp]
lemma X_mul_mem_coeffsIn : X s * p ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ p ∈ coeffsIn σ M := by simp [mul_comm]
variable (M) in
lemma coeffsIn_eq_span_monomial : coeffsIn σ M = .span R {monomial i m | (m ∈ M) (i : σ →₀ ℕ)} := by
classical
refine le_antisymm ?_ <| Submodule.span_le.2 ?_
· rintro p hp
rw [p.as_sum]
exact sum_mem fun i hi ↦ Submodule.subset_span ⟨_, hp i, _, rfl⟩
· rintro _ ⟨m, hm, s, n, rfl⟩ i
simp [coeff_X_pow]
split <;> simp [hm]
lemma coeffsIn_le {N : Submodule R (MvPolynomial σ S)} :
coeffsIn σ M ≤ N ↔ ∀ m ∈ M, ∀ i, monomial i m ∈ N := by
simp [coeffsIn_eq_span_monomial, Submodule.span_le, Set.subset_def,
forall_swap (α := MvPolynomial σ S)]
end Module
section Algebra
variable [Algebra R S] {M : Submodule R S}
lemma coeffsIn_mul (M N : Submodule R S) : coeffsIn σ (M * N) = coeffsIn σ M * coeffsIn σ N := by
classical
refine le_antisymm (coeffsIn_le.2 ?_) ?_
· intros r hr s
induction hr using Submodule.mul_induction_on' with
| mem_mul_mem m hm n hn =>
rw [← add_zero s, ← monomial_mul]
apply Submodule.mul_mem_mul <;> simpa
| add x _ y _ hx hy =>
simpa [map_add] using add_mem hx hy
· rw [Submodule.mul_le]
intros x hx y hy k
rw [MvPolynomial.coeff_mul]
exact sum_mem fun c hc ↦ Submodule.mul_mem_mul (hx _) (hy _)
lemma coeffsIn_pow : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 0 → ∀ M : Submodule R S, coeffsIn σ (M ^ n) = coeffsIn σ M ^ n
| 1, _, M => by simp
| n + 2, _, M => by rw [pow_succ, coeffsIn_mul, coeffsIn_pow, ← pow_succ]; exact n.succ_ne_zero
lemma le_coeffsIn_pow : ∀ {n}, coeffsIn σ M ^ n ≤ coeffsIn σ (M ^ n)
| 0 => by simpa using ⟨1, map_one _⟩
| n + 1 => (coeffsIn_pow n.succ_ne_zero _).ge
end Algebra
end coeffsIn
end CommSemiring
end MvPolynomial
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Basic.lean | 1,450 | 1,460 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Luke Kershaw. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Luke Kershaw, Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Constructions.FiniteProductsOfBinaryProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Triangulated.TriangleShift
/-!
# Pretriangulated Categories
This file contains the definition of pretriangulated categories and triangulated functors
between them.
## Implementation Notes
We work under the assumption that pretriangulated categories are preadditive categories,
but not necessarily additive categories, as is assumed in some sources.
TODO: generalise this to n-angulated categories as in https://arxiv.org/abs/1006.4592
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory Preadditive Limits
universe v v₀ v₁ v₂ u u₀ u₁ u₂
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Pretriangulated ZeroObject
/-
We work in a preadditive category `C` equipped with an additive shift.
-/
variable (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] [HasZeroObject C] [HasShift C ℤ] [Preadditive C]
/-- A preadditive category `C` with an additive shift, and a class of "distinguished triangles"
relative to that shift is called pretriangulated if the following hold:
* Any triangle that is isomorphic to a distinguished triangle is also distinguished.
* Any triangle of the form `(X,X,0,id,0,0)` is distinguished.
* For any morphism `f : X ⟶ Y` there exists a distinguished triangle of the form `(X,Y,Z,f,g,h)`.
* The triangle `(X,Y,Z,f,g,h)` is distinguished if and only if `(Y,Z,X⟦1⟧,g,h,-f⟦1⟧)` is.
* Given a diagram:
```
f g h
X ───> Y ───> Z ───> X⟦1⟧
│ │ │
│a │b │a⟦1⟧'
V V V
X' ───> Y' ───> Z' ───> X'⟦1⟧
f' g' h'
```
where the left square commutes, and whose rows are distinguished triangles,
there exists a morphism `c : Z ⟶ Z'` such that `(a,b,c)` is a triangle morphism.
-/
@[stacks 0145]
class Pretriangulated [∀ n : ℤ, Functor.Additive (shiftFunctor C n)] where
/-- a class of triangle which are called `distinguished` -/
distinguishedTriangles : Set (Triangle C)
/-- a triangle that is isomorphic to a distinguished triangle is distinguished -/
isomorphic_distinguished :
∀ T₁ ∈ distinguishedTriangles, ∀ (T₂) (_ : T₂ ≅ T₁), T₂ ∈ distinguishedTriangles
/-- obvious triangles `X ⟶ X ⟶ 0 ⟶ X⟦1⟧` are distinguished -/
contractible_distinguished : ∀ X : C, contractibleTriangle X ∈ distinguishedTriangles
/-- any morphism `X ⟶ Y` is part of a distinguished triangle `X ⟶ Y ⟶ Z ⟶ X⟦1⟧` -/
distinguished_cocone_triangle :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y),
∃ (Z : C) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (h : Z ⟶ X⟦(1 : ℤ)⟧), Triangle.mk f g h ∈ distinguishedTriangles
/-- a triangle is distinguished iff it is so after rotating it -/
rotate_distinguished_triangle :
∀ T : Triangle C, T ∈ distinguishedTriangles ↔ T.rotate ∈ distinguishedTriangles
/-- given two distinguished triangle, a commutative square
can be extended as morphism of triangles -/
complete_distinguished_triangle_morphism :
∀ (T₁ T₂ : Triangle C) (_ : T₁ ∈ distinguishedTriangles) (_ : T₂ ∈ distinguishedTriangles)
(a : T₁.obj₁ ⟶ T₂.obj₁) (b : T₁.obj₂ ⟶ T₂.obj₂) (_ : T₁.mor₁ ≫ b = a ≫ T₂.mor₁),
∃ c : T₁.obj₃ ⟶ T₂.obj₃, T₁.mor₂ ≫ c = b ≫ T₂.mor₂ ∧ T₁.mor₃ ≫ a⟦1⟧' = c ≫ T₂.mor₃
namespace Pretriangulated
variable [∀ n : ℤ, Functor.Additive (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C n)] [hC : Pretriangulated C]
-- Porting note: increased the priority so that we can write `T ∈ distTriang C`, and
-- not just `T ∈ (distTriang C)`
/-- distinguished triangles in a pretriangulated category -/
notation:60 "distTriang " C => @distinguishedTriangles C _ _ _ _ _ _
variable {C}
lemma distinguished_iff_of_iso {T₁ T₂ : Triangle C} (e : T₁ ≅ T₂) :
(T₁ ∈ distTriang C) ↔ T₂ ∈ distTriang C :=
⟨fun hT₁ => isomorphic_distinguished _ hT₁ _ e.symm,
fun hT₂ => isomorphic_distinguished _ hT₂ _ e⟩
/-- Given any distinguished triangle `T`, then we know `T.rotate` is also distinguished.
-/
theorem rot_of_distTriang (T : Triangle C) (H : T ∈ distTriang C) : T.rotate ∈ distTriang C :=
(rotate_distinguished_triangle T).mp H
/-- Given any distinguished triangle `T`, then we know `T.inv_rotate` is also distinguished.
-/
theorem inv_rot_of_distTriang (T : Triangle C) (H : T ∈ distTriang C) :
T.invRotate ∈ distTriang C :=
(rotate_distinguished_triangle T.invRotate).mpr
(isomorphic_distinguished T H T.invRotate.rotate (invRotCompRot.app T))
/-- Given any distinguished triangle
```
f g h
X ───> Y ───> Z ───> X⟦1⟧
```
the composition `f ≫ g = 0`. -/
@[reassoc, stacks 0146]
theorem comp_distTriang_mor_zero₁₂ (T) (H : T ∈ (distTriang C)) : T.mor₁ ≫ T.mor₂ = 0 := by
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ :=
complete_distinguished_triangle_morphism _ _ (contractible_distinguished T.obj₁) H (𝟙 T.obj₁)
T.mor₁ rfl
simpa only [contractibleTriangle_mor₂, zero_comp] using hc.left.symm
/-- Given any distinguished triangle
```
f g h
X ───> Y ───> Z ───> X⟦1⟧
```
the composition `g ≫ h = 0`. -/
@[reassoc, stacks 0146]
theorem comp_distTriang_mor_zero₂₃ (T : Triangle C) (H : T ∈ distTriang C) :
T.mor₂ ≫ T.mor₃ = 0 :=
comp_distTriang_mor_zero₁₂ T.rotate (rot_of_distTriang T H)
/-- Given any distinguished triangle
```
f g h
X ───> Y ───> Z ───> X⟦1⟧
```
the composition `h ≫ f⟦1⟧ = 0`. -/
@[reassoc, stacks 0146]
theorem comp_distTriang_mor_zero₃₁ (T : Triangle C) (H : T ∈ distTriang C) :
T.mor₃ ≫ T.mor₁⟦1⟧' = 0 := by
have H₂ := rot_of_distTriang T.rotate (rot_of_distTriang T H)
simpa using comp_distTriang_mor_zero₁₂ T.rotate.rotate H₂
/-- The short complex `T.obj₁ ⟶ T.obj₂ ⟶ T.obj₃` attached to a distinguished triangle. -/
@[simps]
def shortComplexOfDistTriangle (T : Triangle C) (hT : T ∈ distTriang C) : ShortComplex C :=
ShortComplex.mk T.mor₁ T.mor₂ (comp_distTriang_mor_zero₁₂ _ hT)
/-- The isomorphism between the short complex attached to
two isomorphic distinguished triangles. -/
@[simps!]
def shortComplexOfDistTriangleIsoOfIso {T T' : Triangle C} (e : T ≅ T') (hT : T ∈ distTriang C) :
shortComplexOfDistTriangle T hT ≅ shortComplexOfDistTriangle T'
(isomorphic_distinguished _ hT _ e.symm) :=
ShortComplex.isoMk (Triangle.π₁.mapIso e) (Triangle.π₂.mapIso e) (Triangle.π₃.mapIso e)
/-- Any morphism `Y ⟶ Z` is part of a distinguished triangle `X ⟶ Y ⟶ Z ⟶ X⟦1⟧` -/
lemma distinguished_cocone_triangle₁ {Y Z : C} (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
∃ (X : C) (f : X ⟶ Y) (h : Z ⟶ X⟦(1 : ℤ)⟧), Triangle.mk f g h ∈ distTriang C := by
obtain ⟨X', f', g', mem⟩ := distinguished_cocone_triangle g
exact ⟨_, _, _, inv_rot_of_distTriang _ mem⟩
/-- Any morphism `Z ⟶ X⟦1⟧` is part of a distinguished triangle `X ⟶ Y ⟶ Z ⟶ X⟦1⟧` -/
lemma distinguished_cocone_triangle₂ {Z X : C} (h : Z ⟶ X⟦(1 : ℤ)⟧) :
∃ (Y : C) (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z), Triangle.mk f g h ∈ distTriang C := by
obtain ⟨Y', f', g', mem⟩ := distinguished_cocone_triangle h
let T' := (Triangle.mk h f' g').invRotate.invRotate
refine ⟨T'.obj₂, ((shiftEquiv C (1 : ℤ)).unitIso.app X).hom ≫ T'.mor₁, T'.mor₂,
isomorphic_distinguished _ (inv_rot_of_distTriang _ (inv_rot_of_distTriang _ mem)) _ ?_⟩
exact Triangle.isoMk _ _ ((shiftEquiv C (1 : ℤ)).unitIso.app X) (Iso.refl _) (Iso.refl _)
(by aesop_cat) (by aesop_cat)
(by dsimp; simp only [shift_shiftFunctorCompIsoId_inv_app, id_comp])
/-- A commutative square involving the morphisms `mor₂` of two distinguished triangles
can be extended as morphism of triangles -/
lemma complete_distinguished_triangle_morphism₁ (T₁ T₂ : Triangle C)
(hT₁ : T₁ ∈ distTriang C) (hT₂ : T₂ ∈ distTriang C) (b : T₁.obj₂ ⟶ T₂.obj₂)
(c : T₁.obj₃ ⟶ T₂.obj₃) (comm : T₁.mor₂ ≫ c = b ≫ T₂.mor₂) :
∃ (a : T₁.obj₁ ⟶ T₂.obj₁), T₁.mor₁ ≫ b = a ≫ T₂.mor₁ ∧
T₁.mor₃ ≫ a⟦(1 : ℤ)⟧' = c ≫ T₂.mor₃ := by
obtain ⟨a, ⟨ha₁, ha₂⟩⟩ := complete_distinguished_triangle_morphism _ _
(rot_of_distTriang _ hT₁) (rot_of_distTriang _ hT₂) b c comm
refine ⟨(shiftFunctor C (1 : ℤ)).preimage a, ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· apply (shiftFunctor C (1 : ℤ)).map_injective
dsimp at ha₂
rw [neg_comp, comp_neg, neg_inj] at ha₂
simpa only [Functor.map_comp, Functor.map_preimage] using ha₂
· simpa only [Functor.map_preimage] using ha₁
/-- A commutative square involving the morphisms `mor₃` of two distinguished triangles
can be extended as morphism of triangles -/
lemma complete_distinguished_triangle_morphism₂ (T₁ T₂ : Triangle C)
(hT₁ : T₁ ∈ distTriang C) (hT₂ : T₂ ∈ distTriang C) (a : T₁.obj₁ ⟶ T₂.obj₁)
(c : T₁.obj₃ ⟶ T₂.obj₃) (comm : T₁.mor₃ ≫ a⟦(1 : ℤ)⟧' = c ≫ T₂.mor₃) :
∃ (b : T₁.obj₂ ⟶ T₂.obj₂), T₁.mor₁ ≫ b = a ≫ T₂.mor₁ ∧ T₁.mor₂ ≫ c = b ≫ T₂.mor₂ := by
obtain ⟨a, ⟨ha₁, ha₂⟩⟩ := complete_distinguished_triangle_morphism _ _
(inv_rot_of_distTriang _ hT₁) (inv_rot_of_distTriang _ hT₂) (c⟦(-1 : ℤ)⟧') a (by
dsimp
simp only [neg_comp, comp_neg, ← Functor.map_comp_assoc, ← comm,
Functor.map_comp, shift_shift_neg', Functor.id_obj, assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id_app, comp_id])
refine ⟨a, ⟨ha₁, ?_⟩⟩
dsimp only [Triangle.invRotate, Triangle.mk] at ha₂
rw [← cancel_mono ((shiftEquiv C (1 : ℤ)).counitIso.inv.app T₂.obj₃), assoc, assoc, ← ha₂]
simp only [shiftEquiv'_counitIso, shift_neg_shift', assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id_app_assoc]
/-- Obvious triangles `0 ⟶ X ⟶ X ⟶ 0⟦1⟧` are distinguished -/
lemma contractible_distinguished₁ (X : C) :
Triangle.mk (0 : 0 ⟶ X) (𝟙 X) 0 ∈ distTriang C := by
refine isomorphic_distinguished _
(inv_rot_of_distTriang _ (contractible_distinguished X)) _ ?_
exact Triangle.isoMk _ _ (Functor.mapZeroObject _).symm (Iso.refl _) (Iso.refl _)
(by simp) (by simp) (by simp)
/-- Obvious triangles `X ⟶ 0 ⟶ X⟦1⟧ ⟶ X⟦1⟧` are distinguished -/
lemma contractible_distinguished₂ (X : C) :
Triangle.mk (0 : X ⟶ 0) 0 (𝟙 (X⟦1⟧)) ∈ distTriang C := by
refine isomorphic_distinguished _
(inv_rot_of_distTriang _ (contractible_distinguished₁ (X⟦(1 : ℤ)⟧))) _ ?_
exact Triangle.isoMk _ _ ((shiftEquiv C (1 : ℤ)).unitIso.app X) (Iso.refl _) (Iso.refl _)
(by simp) (by simp)
(by dsimp; simp only [shift_shiftFunctorCompIsoId_inv_app, id_comp])
namespace Triangle
variable (T : Triangle C) (hT : T ∈ distTriang C)
include hT
lemma yoneda_exact₂ {X : C} (f : T.obj₂ ⟶ X) (hf : T.mor₁ ≫ f = 0) :
∃ (g : T.obj₃ ⟶ X), f = T.mor₂ ≫ g := by
obtain ⟨g, ⟨hg₁, _⟩⟩ := complete_distinguished_triangle_morphism T _ hT
(contractible_distinguished₁ X) 0 f (by aesop_cat)
exact ⟨g, by simpa using hg₁.symm⟩
lemma yoneda_exact₃ {X : C} (f : T.obj₃ ⟶ X) (hf : T.mor₂ ≫ f = 0) :
∃ (g : T.obj₁⟦(1 : ℤ)⟧ ⟶ X), f = T.mor₃ ≫ g :=
yoneda_exact₂ _ (rot_of_distTriang _ hT) f hf
lemma coyoneda_exact₂ {X : C} (f : X ⟶ T.obj₂) (hf : f ≫ T.mor₂ = 0) :
∃ (g : X ⟶ T.obj₁), f = g ≫ T.mor₁ := by
obtain ⟨a, ⟨ha₁, _⟩⟩ := complete_distinguished_triangle_morphism₁ _ T
(contractible_distinguished X) hT f 0 (by aesop_cat)
exact ⟨a, by simpa using ha₁⟩
lemma coyoneda_exact₁ {X : C} (f : X ⟶ T.obj₁⟦(1 : ℤ)⟧) (hf : f ≫ T.mor₁⟦1⟧' = 0) :
∃ (g : X ⟶ T.obj₃), f = g ≫ T.mor₃ :=
coyoneda_exact₂ _ (rot_of_distTriang _ (rot_of_distTriang _ hT)) f (by aesop_cat)
lemma coyoneda_exact₃ {X : C} (f : X ⟶ T.obj₃) (hf : f ≫ T.mor₃ = 0) :
∃ (g : X ⟶ T.obj₂), f = g ≫ T.mor₂ :=
coyoneda_exact₂ _ (rot_of_distTriang _ hT) f hf
lemma mor₃_eq_zero_iff_epi₂ : T.mor₃ = 0 ↔ Epi T.mor₂ := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [epi_iff_cancel_zero]
intro X g hg
obtain ⟨f, rfl⟩ := yoneda_exact₃ T hT g hg
rw [h, zero_comp]
· intro
rw [← cancel_epi T.mor₂, comp_distTriang_mor_zero₂₃ _ hT, comp_zero]
lemma mor₂_eq_zero_iff_epi₁ : T.mor₂ = 0 ↔ Epi T.mor₁ := by
have h := mor₃_eq_zero_iff_epi₂ _ (inv_rot_of_distTriang _ hT)
dsimp at h
rw [← h, IsIso.comp_right_eq_zero]
lemma mor₁_eq_zero_iff_epi₃ : T.mor₁ = 0 ↔ Epi T.mor₃ := by
have h := mor₃_eq_zero_iff_epi₂ _ (rot_of_distTriang _ hT)
dsimp at h
rw [← h, neg_eq_zero]
constructor
· intro h
simp only [h, Functor.map_zero]
· intro h
rw [← (CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor C (1 : ℤ)).map_eq_zero_iff, h]
lemma mor₃_eq_zero_of_epi₂ (h : Epi T.mor₂) : T.mor₃ = 0 := (T.mor₃_eq_zero_iff_epi₂ hT).2 h
lemma mor₂_eq_zero_of_epi₁ (h : Epi T.mor₁) : T.mor₂ = 0 := (T.mor₂_eq_zero_iff_epi₁ hT).2 h
lemma mor₁_eq_zero_of_epi₃ (h : Epi T.mor₃) : T.mor₁ = 0 := (T.mor₁_eq_zero_iff_epi₃ hT).2 h
|
lemma epi₂ (h : T.mor₃ = 0) : Epi T.mor₂ := (T.mor₃_eq_zero_iff_epi₂ hT).1 h
lemma epi₁ (h : T.mor₂ = 0) : Epi T.mor₁ := (T.mor₂_eq_zero_iff_epi₁ hT).1 h
lemma epi₃ (h : T.mor₁ = 0) : Epi T.mor₃ := (T.mor₁_eq_zero_iff_epi₃ hT).1 h
lemma mor₁_eq_zero_iff_mono₂ : T.mor₁ = 0 ↔ Mono T.mor₂ := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [mono_iff_cancel_zero]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Triangulated/Pretriangulated.lean | 284 | 292 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.IsPrimePow
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Int
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.CharZero
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Ring
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PrimeFin
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
/-!
# Divisor Finsets
This file defines sets of divisors of a natural number. This is particularly useful as background
for defining Dirichlet convolution.
## Main Definitions
Let `n : ℕ`. All of the following definitions are in the `Nat` namespace:
* `divisors n` is the `Finset` of natural numbers that divide `n`.
* `properDivisors n` is the `Finset` of natural numbers that divide `n`, other than `n`.
* `divisorsAntidiagonal n` is the `Finset` of pairs `(x,y)` such that `x * y = n`.
* `Perfect n` is true when `n` is positive and the sum of `properDivisors n` is `n`.
## Conventions
Since `0` has infinitely many divisors, none of the definitions in this file make sense for it.
Therefore we adopt the convention that `Nat.divisors 0`, `Nat.properDivisors 0`,
`Nat.divisorsAntidiagonal 0` and `Int.divisorsAntidiag 0` are all `∅`.
## Tags
divisors, perfect numbers
-/
open Finset
namespace Nat
variable (n : ℕ)
/-- `divisors n` is the `Finset` of divisors of `n`. By convention, we set `divisors 0 = ∅`. -/
def divisors : Finset ℕ := {d ∈ Ico 1 (n + 1) | d ∣ n}
/-- `properDivisors n` is the `Finset` of divisors of `n`, other than `n`.
By convention, we set `properDivisors 0 = ∅`. -/
def properDivisors : Finset ℕ := {d ∈ Ico 1 n | d ∣ n}
/-- Pairs of divisors of a natural number as a finset.
`n.divisorsAntidiagonal` is the finset of pairs `(a, b) : ℕ × ℕ` such that `a * b = n`.
By convention, we set `Nat.divisorsAntidiagonal 0 = ∅`.
O(n). -/
def divisorsAntidiagonal : Finset (ℕ × ℕ) :=
(Icc 1 n).filterMap (fun x ↦ let y := n / x; if x * y = n then some (x, y) else none)
fun x₁ x₂ (x, y) hx₁ hx₂ ↦ by aesop
/-- Pairs of divisors of a natural number, as a list.
`n.divisorsAntidiagonalList` is the list of pairs `(a, b) : ℕ × ℕ` such that `a * b = n`, ordered
by increasing `a`. By convention, we set `Nat.divisorsAntidiagonalList 0 = []`.
-/
def divisorsAntidiagonalList (n : ℕ) : List (ℕ × ℕ) :=
(List.range' 1 n).filterMap
(fun x ↦ let y := n / x; if x * y = n then some (x, y) else none)
variable {n}
@[simp]
theorem filter_dvd_eq_divisors (h : n ≠ 0) : {d ∈ range n.succ | d ∣ n} = n.divisors := by
ext
simp only [divisors, mem_filter, mem_range, mem_Ico, and_congr_left_iff, iff_and_self]
exact fun ha _ => succ_le_iff.mpr (pos_of_dvd_of_pos ha h.bot_lt)
@[simp]
theorem filter_dvd_eq_properDivisors (h : n ≠ 0) : {d ∈ range n | d ∣ n} = n.properDivisors := by
ext
simp only [properDivisors, mem_filter, mem_range, mem_Ico, and_congr_left_iff, iff_and_self]
exact fun ha _ => succ_le_iff.mpr (pos_of_dvd_of_pos ha h.bot_lt)
theorem properDivisors.not_self_mem : ¬n ∈ properDivisors n := by simp [properDivisors]
@[simp]
theorem mem_properDivisors {m : ℕ} : n ∈ properDivisors m ↔ n ∣ m ∧ n < m := by
rcases eq_or_ne m 0 with (rfl | hm); · simp [properDivisors]
simp only [and_comm, ← filter_dvd_eq_properDivisors hm, mem_filter, mem_range]
theorem insert_self_properDivisors (h : n ≠ 0) : insert n (properDivisors n) = divisors n := by
rw [divisors, properDivisors, Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_Ico (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 h),
Finset.filter_insert, if_pos (dvd_refl n)]
theorem cons_self_properDivisors (h : n ≠ 0) :
cons n (properDivisors n) properDivisors.not_self_mem = divisors n := by
rw [cons_eq_insert, insert_self_properDivisors h]
@[simp]
theorem mem_divisors {m : ℕ} : n ∈ divisors m ↔ n ∣ m ∧ m ≠ 0 := by
rcases eq_or_ne m 0 with (rfl | hm); · simp [divisors]
simp only [hm, Ne, not_false_iff, and_true, ← filter_dvd_eq_divisors hm, mem_filter,
mem_range, and_iff_right_iff_imp, Nat.lt_succ_iff]
exact le_of_dvd hm.bot_lt
theorem one_mem_divisors : 1 ∈ divisors n ↔ n ≠ 0 := by simp
theorem mem_divisors_self (n : ℕ) (h : n ≠ 0) : n ∈ n.divisors :=
mem_divisors.2 ⟨dvd_rfl, h⟩
theorem dvd_of_mem_divisors {m : ℕ} (h : n ∈ divisors m) : n ∣ m := by
cases m
· apply dvd_zero
· simp [mem_divisors.1 h]
@[simp]
theorem mem_divisorsAntidiagonal {x : ℕ × ℕ} :
x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n ↔ x.fst * x.snd = n ∧ n ≠ 0 := by
obtain ⟨a, b⟩ := x
simp only [divisorsAntidiagonal, mul_div_eq_iff_dvd, mem_filterMap, mem_Icc, one_le_iff_ne_zero,
Option.ite_none_right_eq_some, Option.some.injEq, Prod.ext_iff, and_left_comm, exists_eq_left]
constructor
· rintro ⟨han, ⟨ha, han'⟩, rfl⟩
simp [Nat.mul_div_eq_iff_dvd, han]
omega
· rintro ⟨rfl, hab⟩
rw [mul_ne_zero_iff] at hab
simpa [hab.1, hab.2] using Nat.le_mul_of_pos_right _ hab.2.bot_lt
@[simp] lemma divisorsAntidiagonalList_zero : divisorsAntidiagonalList 0 = [] := rfl
@[simp] lemma divisorsAntidiagonalList_one : divisorsAntidiagonalList 1 = [(1, 1)] := rfl
@[simp]
lemma toFinset_divisorsAntidiagonalList {n : ℕ} :
n.divisorsAntidiagonalList.toFinset = n.divisorsAntidiagonal := by
rw [divisorsAntidiagonalList, divisorsAntidiagonal, List.toFinset_filterMap (f_inj := by aesop),
List.toFinset_range'_1_1]
lemma sorted_divisorsAntidiagonalList_fst {n : ℕ} :
n.divisorsAntidiagonalList.Sorted (·.fst < ·.fst) := by
refine (List.sorted_lt_range' _ _ Nat.one_ne_zero).filterMap fun a b c d h h' ha => ?_
rw [Option.ite_none_right_eq_some, Option.some.injEq] at h h'
simpa [← h.right, ← h'.right]
lemma sorted_divisorsAntidiagonalList_snd {n : ℕ} :
n.divisorsAntidiagonalList.Sorted (·.snd > ·.snd) := by
obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne n 0
· simp
refine (List.sorted_lt_range' _ _ Nat.one_ne_zero).filterMap ?_
simp only [Option.ite_none_right_eq_some, Option.some.injEq, gt_iff_lt, and_imp, Prod.forall,
Prod.mk.injEq]
rintro a b _ _ _ _ ha rfl rfl hb rfl rfl hab
rwa [Nat.div_lt_div_left hn ⟨_, hb.symm⟩ ⟨_, ha.symm⟩]
lemma nodup_divisorsAntidiagonalList {n : ℕ} : n.divisorsAntidiagonalList.Nodup :=
have : IsIrrefl (ℕ × ℕ) (·.fst < ·.fst) := ⟨by simp⟩
sorted_divisorsAntidiagonalList_fst.nodup
/-- The `Finset` and `List` versions agree by definition. -/
@[simp]
theorem val_divisorsAntidiagonal (n : ℕ) :
(divisorsAntidiagonal n).val = divisorsAntidiagonalList n :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma mem_divisorsAntidiagonalList {n : ℕ} {a : ℕ × ℕ} :
a ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonalList ↔ a.1 * a.2 = n ∧ n ≠ 0 := by
rw [← List.mem_toFinset, toFinset_divisorsAntidiagonalList, mem_divisorsAntidiagonal]
@[simp high]
lemma swap_mem_divisorsAntidiagonalList {a : ℕ × ℕ} :
a.swap ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonalList ↔ a ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonalList := by simp [mul_comm]
lemma reverse_divisorsAntidiagonalList (n : ℕ) :
n.divisorsAntidiagonalList.reverse = n.divisorsAntidiagonalList.map .swap := by
have : IsAsymm (ℕ × ℕ) (·.snd < ·.snd) := ⟨fun _ _ ↦ lt_asymm⟩
refine List.eq_of_perm_of_sorted ?_ sorted_divisorsAntidiagonalList_snd.reverse <|
sorted_divisorsAntidiagonalList_fst.map _ fun _ _ ↦ id
simp [List.reverse_perm', List.perm_ext_iff_of_nodup nodup_divisorsAntidiagonalList
(nodup_divisorsAntidiagonalList.map Prod.swap_injective), mul_comm]
lemma ne_zero_of_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal {p : ℕ × ℕ} (hp : p ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonal) :
p.1 ≠ 0 ∧ p.2 ≠ 0 := by
obtain ⟨hp₁, hp₂⟩ := Nat.mem_divisorsAntidiagonal.mp hp
exact mul_ne_zero_iff.mp (hp₁.symm ▸ hp₂)
lemma left_ne_zero_of_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal {p : ℕ × ℕ} (hp : p ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonal) :
p.1 ≠ 0 :=
(ne_zero_of_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal hp).1
lemma right_ne_zero_of_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal {p : ℕ × ℕ} (hp : p ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonal) :
p.2 ≠ 0 :=
(ne_zero_of_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal hp).2
theorem divisor_le {m : ℕ} : n ∈ divisors m → n ≤ m := by
rcases m with - | m
· simp
· simp only [mem_divisors, Nat.succ_ne_zero m, and_true, Ne, not_false_iff]
exact Nat.le_of_dvd (Nat.succ_pos m)
theorem divisors_subset_of_dvd {m : ℕ} (hzero : n ≠ 0) (h : m ∣ n) : divisors m ⊆ divisors n :=
Finset.subset_iff.2 fun _x hx => Nat.mem_divisors.mpr ⟨(Nat.mem_divisors.mp hx).1.trans h, hzero⟩
theorem card_divisors_le_self (n : ℕ) : #n.divisors ≤ n := calc
_ ≤ #(Ico 1 (n + 1)) := by
apply card_le_card
simp only [divisors, filter_subset]
_ = n := by rw [card_Ico, add_tsub_cancel_right]
theorem divisors_subset_properDivisors {m : ℕ} (hzero : n ≠ 0) (h : m ∣ n) (hdiff : m ≠ n) :
divisors m ⊆ properDivisors n := by
apply Finset.subset_iff.2
intro x hx
exact
Nat.mem_properDivisors.2
⟨(Nat.mem_divisors.1 hx).1.trans h,
lt_of_le_of_lt (divisor_le hx)
(lt_of_le_of_ne (divisor_le (Nat.mem_divisors.2 ⟨h, hzero⟩)) hdiff)⟩
lemma divisors_filter_dvd_of_dvd {n m : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hm : m ∣ n) :
{d ∈ n.divisors | d ∣ m} = m.divisors := by
ext k
simp_rw [mem_filter, mem_divisors]
exact ⟨fun ⟨_, hkm⟩ ↦ ⟨hkm, ne_zero_of_dvd_ne_zero hn hm⟩, fun ⟨hk, _⟩ ↦ ⟨⟨hk.trans hm, hn⟩, hk⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem divisors_zero : divisors 0 = ∅ := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem properDivisors_zero : properDivisors 0 = ∅ := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
lemma nonempty_divisors : (divisors n).Nonempty ↔ n ≠ 0 :=
⟨fun ⟨m, hm⟩ hn ↦ by simp [hn] at hm, fun hn ↦ ⟨1, one_mem_divisors.2 hn⟩⟩
@[simp]
lemma divisors_eq_empty : divisors n = ∅ ↔ n = 0 :=
not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.symm.trans nonempty_divisors.not_left
theorem properDivisors_subset_divisors : properDivisors n ⊆ divisors n :=
filter_subset_filter _ <| Ico_subset_Ico_right n.le_succ
@[simp]
theorem divisors_one : divisors 1 = {1} := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem properDivisors_one : properDivisors 1 = ∅ := by rw [properDivisors, Ico_self, filter_empty]
theorem pos_of_mem_divisors {m : ℕ} (h : m ∈ n.divisors) : 0 < m := by
cases m
· rw [mem_divisors, zero_dvd_iff (a := n)] at h
cases h.2 h.1
apply Nat.succ_pos
theorem pos_of_mem_properDivisors {m : ℕ} (h : m ∈ n.properDivisors) : 0 < m :=
pos_of_mem_divisors (properDivisors_subset_divisors h)
theorem one_mem_properDivisors_iff_one_lt : 1 ∈ n.properDivisors ↔ 1 < n := by
rw [mem_properDivisors, and_iff_right (one_dvd _)]
@[simp]
lemma sup_divisors_id (n : ℕ) : n.divisors.sup id = n := by
refine le_antisymm (Finset.sup_le fun _ ↦ divisor_le) ?_
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne n 0 with rfl | hn
· apply zero_le
· exact Finset.le_sup (f := id) <| mem_divisors_self n hn
lemma one_lt_of_mem_properDivisors {m n : ℕ} (h : m ∈ n.properDivisors) : 1 < n :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (pos_of_mem_properDivisors h) (mem_properDivisors.1 h).2
lemma one_lt_div_of_mem_properDivisors {m n : ℕ} (h : m ∈ n.properDivisors) :
1 < n / m := by
obtain ⟨h_dvd, h_lt⟩ := mem_properDivisors.mp h
rwa [Nat.lt_div_iff_mul_lt' h_dvd, mul_one]
/-- See also `Nat.mem_properDivisors`. -/
lemma mem_properDivisors_iff_exists {m n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
m ∈ n.properDivisors ↔ ∃ k > 1, n = m * k := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨n / m, one_lt_div_of_mem_properDivisors h, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· exact (Nat.mul_div_cancel' (mem_properDivisors.mp h).1).symm
· rintro ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩
rw [mul_ne_zero_iff] at hn
exact mem_properDivisors.mpr ⟨⟨k, rfl⟩, lt_mul_of_one_lt_right (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn.1) hk⟩
@[simp]
lemma nonempty_properDivisors : n.properDivisors.Nonempty ↔ 1 < n :=
⟨fun ⟨_m, hm⟩ ↦ one_lt_of_mem_properDivisors hm, fun hn ↦
⟨1, one_mem_properDivisors_iff_one_lt.2 hn⟩⟩
@[simp]
lemma properDivisors_eq_empty : n.properDivisors = ∅ ↔ n ≤ 1 := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_properDivisors, not_lt]
@[simp]
theorem divisorsAntidiagonal_zero : divisorsAntidiagonal 0 = ∅ := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem divisorsAntidiagonal_one : divisorsAntidiagonal 1 = {(1, 1)} := by
ext
simp [mul_eq_one, Prod.ext_iff]
@[simp high]
theorem swap_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal {x : ℕ × ℕ} :
x.swap ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n ↔ x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n := by
rw [mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, mul_comm, Prod.swap]
/-- `Nat.swap_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal` with the LHS in simp normal form. -/
@[deprecated swap_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal (since := "2025-02-17")]
theorem swap_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal_aux {x : ℕ × ℕ} :
x.snd * x.fst = n ∧ ¬n = 0 ↔ x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n := by
| rw [mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, mul_comm]
lemma prodMk_mem_divisorsAntidiag {x y : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(x, y) ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonal ↔ x * y = n := by simp [hn]
theorem fst_mem_divisors_of_mem_antidiagonal {x : ℕ × ℕ} (h : x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n) :
x.fst ∈ divisors n := by
rw [mem_divisorsAntidiagonal] at h
simp [Dvd.intro _ h.1, h.2]
theorem snd_mem_divisors_of_mem_antidiagonal {x : ℕ × ℕ} (h : x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n) :
x.snd ∈ divisors n := by
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Divisors.lean | 319 | 330 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Quotient.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Prod
/-!
# Projection to a subspace
In this file we define
* `Submodule.linearProjOfIsCompl (p q : Submodule R E) (h : IsCompl p q)`:
the projection of a module `E` to a submodule `p` along its complement `q`;
it is the unique linear map `f : E → p` such that `f x = x` for `x ∈ p` and `f x = 0` for `x ∈ q`.
* `Submodule.isComplEquivProj p`: equivalence between submodules `q`
such that `IsCompl p q` and projections `f : E → p`, `∀ x ∈ p, f x = x`.
We also provide some lemmas justifying correctness of our definitions.
## Tags
projection, complement subspace
-/
noncomputable section Ring
variable {R : Type*} [Ring R] {E : Type*} [AddCommGroup E] [Module R E]
variable {F : Type*} [AddCommGroup F] [Module R F] {G : Type*} [AddCommGroup G] [Module R G]
variable (p q : Submodule R E)
variable {S : Type*} [Semiring S] {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module S M] (m : Submodule S M)
namespace LinearMap
variable {p}
open Submodule
theorem ker_id_sub_eq_of_proj {f : E →ₗ[R] p} (hf : ∀ x : p, f x = x) :
ker (id - p.subtype.comp f) = p := by
ext x
simp only [comp_apply, mem_ker, subtype_apply, sub_apply, id_apply, sub_eq_zero]
exact ⟨fun h => h.symm ▸ Submodule.coe_mem _, fun hx => by rw [hf ⟨x, hx⟩, Subtype.coe_mk]⟩
theorem range_eq_of_proj {f : E →ₗ[R] p} (hf : ∀ x : p, f x = x) : range f = ⊤ :=
range_eq_top.2 fun x => ⟨x, hf x⟩
theorem isCompl_of_proj {f : E →ₗ[R] p} (hf : ∀ x : p, f x = x) : IsCompl p (ker f) := by
constructor
· rw [disjoint_iff_inf_le]
rintro x ⟨hpx, hfx⟩
rw [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_ker, hf ⟨x, hpx⟩, mk_eq_zero] at hfx
simp only [hfx, SetLike.mem_coe, zero_mem]
· rw [codisjoint_iff_le_sup]
intro x _
rw [mem_sup']
refine ⟨f x, ⟨x - f x, ?_⟩, add_sub_cancel _ _⟩
rw [mem_ker, LinearMap.map_sub, hf, sub_self]
end LinearMap
namespace Submodule
open LinearMap
/-- If `q` is a complement of `p`, then `M/p ≃ q`. -/
def quotientEquivOfIsCompl (h : IsCompl p q) : (E ⧸ p) ≃ₗ[R] q :=
LinearEquiv.symm <|
LinearEquiv.ofBijective (p.mkQ.comp q.subtype)
⟨by rw [← ker_eq_bot, ker_comp, ker_mkQ, disjoint_iff_comap_eq_bot.1 h.symm.disjoint], by
rw [← range_eq_top, range_comp, range_subtype, map_mkQ_eq_top, h.sup_eq_top]⟩
@[simp]
theorem quotientEquivOfIsCompl_symm_apply (h : IsCompl p q) (x : q) :
-- Porting note: type ascriptions needed on the RHS
(quotientEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm x = (Quotient.mk x : E ⧸ p) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem quotientEquivOfIsCompl_apply_mk_coe (h : IsCompl p q) (x : q) :
quotientEquivOfIsCompl p q h (Quotient.mk x) = x :=
(quotientEquivOfIsCompl p q h).apply_symm_apply x
@[simp]
theorem mk_quotientEquivOfIsCompl_apply (h : IsCompl p q) (x : E ⧸ p) :
(Quotient.mk (quotientEquivOfIsCompl p q h x) : E ⧸ p) = x :=
(quotientEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm_apply_apply x
/-- If `q` is a complement of `p`, then `p × q` is isomorphic to `E`. It is the unique
linear map `f : E → p` such that `f x = x` for `x ∈ p` and `f x = 0` for `x ∈ q`. -/
def prodEquivOfIsCompl (h : IsCompl p q) : (p × q) ≃ₗ[R] E := by
apply LinearEquiv.ofBijective (p.subtype.coprod q.subtype)
constructor
· rw [← ker_eq_bot, ker_coprod_of_disjoint_range, ker_subtype, ker_subtype, prod_bot]
rw [range_subtype, range_subtype]
exact h.1
· rw [← range_eq_top, ← sup_eq_range, h.sup_eq_top]
@[simp]
theorem coe_prodEquivOfIsCompl (h : IsCompl p q) :
(prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h : p × q →ₗ[R] E) = p.subtype.coprod q.subtype := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_prodEquivOfIsCompl' (h : IsCompl p q) (x : p × q) :
prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h x = x.1 + x.2 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem prodEquivOfIsCompl_symm_apply_left (h : IsCompl p q) (x : p) :
(prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm x = (x, 0) :=
(prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm_apply_eq.2 <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem prodEquivOfIsCompl_symm_apply_right (h : IsCompl p q) (x : q) :
(prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm x = (0, x) :=
(prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm_apply_eq.2 <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem prodEquivOfIsCompl_symm_apply_fst_eq_zero (h : IsCompl p q) {x : E} :
((prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm x).1 = 0 ↔ x ∈ q := by
conv_rhs => rw [← (prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).apply_symm_apply x]
rw [coe_prodEquivOfIsCompl', Submodule.add_mem_iff_left _ (Submodule.coe_mem _),
mem_right_iff_eq_zero_of_disjoint h.disjoint]
@[simp]
theorem prodEquivOfIsCompl_symm_apply_snd_eq_zero (h : IsCompl p q) {x : E} :
((prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm x).2 = 0 ↔ x ∈ p := by
conv_rhs => rw [← (prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).apply_symm_apply x]
rw [coe_prodEquivOfIsCompl', Submodule.add_mem_iff_right _ (Submodule.coe_mem _),
mem_left_iff_eq_zero_of_disjoint h.disjoint]
@[simp]
theorem prodComm_trans_prodEquivOfIsCompl (h : IsCompl p q) :
LinearEquiv.prodComm R q p ≪≫ₗ prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h = prodEquivOfIsCompl q p h.symm :=
LinearEquiv.ext fun _ => add_comm _ _
/-- Projection to a submodule along a complement.
See also `LinearMap.linearProjOfIsCompl`. -/
def linearProjOfIsCompl (h : IsCompl p q) : E →ₗ[R] p :=
LinearMap.fst R p q ∘ₗ ↑(prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm
variable {p q}
@[simp]
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_left (h : IsCompl p q) (x : p) :
linearProjOfIsCompl p q h x = x := by simp [linearProjOfIsCompl]
@[simp]
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_range (h : IsCompl p q) : range (linearProjOfIsCompl p q h) = ⊤ :=
range_eq_of_proj (linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_left h)
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_surjective (h : IsCompl p q) :
Function.Surjective (linearProjOfIsCompl p q h) :=
range_eq_top.mp (linearProjOfIsCompl_range h)
@[simp]
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_eq_zero_iff (h : IsCompl p q) {x : E} :
linearProjOfIsCompl p q h x = 0 ↔ x ∈ q := by simp [linearProjOfIsCompl]
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_right' (h : IsCompl p q) (x : E) (hx : x ∈ q) :
linearProjOfIsCompl p q h x = 0 :=
(linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_eq_zero_iff h).2 hx
@[simp]
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_right (h : IsCompl p q) (x : q) :
linearProjOfIsCompl p q h x = 0 :=
linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_right' h x x.2
@[simp]
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_ker (h : IsCompl p q) : ker (linearProjOfIsCompl p q h) = q :=
ext fun _ => mem_ker.trans (linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_eq_zero_iff h)
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_comp_subtype (h : IsCompl p q) :
(linearProjOfIsCompl p q h).comp p.subtype = LinearMap.id :=
LinearMap.ext <| linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_left h
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_idempotent (h : IsCompl p q) (x : E) :
linearProjOfIsCompl p q h (linearProjOfIsCompl p q h x) = linearProjOfIsCompl p q h x :=
linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_left h _
theorem existsUnique_add_of_isCompl_prod (hc : IsCompl p q) (x : E) :
∃! u : p × q, (u.fst : E) + u.snd = x :=
(prodEquivOfIsCompl _ _ hc).toEquiv.bijective.existsUnique _
theorem existsUnique_add_of_isCompl (hc : IsCompl p q) (x : E) :
∃ (u : p) (v : q), (u : E) + v = x ∧ ∀ (r : p) (s : q), (r : E) + s = x → r = u ∧ s = v :=
let ⟨u, hu₁, hu₂⟩ := existsUnique_add_of_isCompl_prod hc x
⟨u.1, u.2, hu₁, fun r s hrs => Prod.eq_iff_fst_eq_snd_eq.1 (hu₂ ⟨r, s⟩ hrs)⟩
theorem linear_proj_add_linearProjOfIsCompl_eq_self (hpq : IsCompl p q) (x : E) :
(p.linearProjOfIsCompl q hpq x + q.linearProjOfIsCompl p hpq.symm x : E) = x := by
dsimp only [linearProjOfIsCompl]
rw [← prodComm_trans_prodEquivOfIsCompl _ _ hpq]
exact (prodEquivOfIsCompl _ _ hpq).apply_symm_apply x
end Submodule
namespace LinearMap
open Submodule
/-- Projection to the image of an injection along a complement.
This has an advantage over `Submodule.linearProjOfIsCompl` in that it allows the user better
definitional control over the type. -/
def linearProjOfIsCompl {F : Type*} [AddCommGroup F] [Module R F]
(i : F →ₗ[R] E) (hi : Function.Injective i)
(h : IsCompl (LinearMap.range i) q) : E →ₗ[R] F :=
(LinearEquiv.ofInjective i hi).symm ∘ₗ (LinearMap.range i).linearProjOfIsCompl q h
@[simp]
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_left {F : Type*} [AddCommGroup F] [Module R F]
(i : F →ₗ[R] E) (hi : Function.Injective i)
(h : IsCompl (LinearMap.range i) q) (x : F) :
linearProjOfIsCompl q i hi h (i x) = x := by
let ix : LinearMap.range i := ⟨i x, mem_range_self i x⟩
change linearProjOfIsCompl q i hi h ix = x
rw [linearProjOfIsCompl, coe_comp, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, Function.comp_apply,
LinearEquiv.symm_apply_eq, Submodule.linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_left, Subtype.ext_iff,
LinearEquiv.ofInjective_apply]
/-- Given linear maps `φ` and `ψ` from complement submodules, `LinearMap.ofIsCompl` is
the induced linear map over the entire module. -/
def ofIsCompl {p q : Submodule R E} (h : IsCompl p q) (φ : p →ₗ[R] F) (ψ : q →ₗ[R] F) : E →ₗ[R] F :=
LinearMap.coprod φ ψ ∘ₗ ↑(Submodule.prodEquivOfIsCompl _ _ h).symm
variable {p q}
@[simp]
theorem ofIsCompl_left_apply (h : IsCompl p q) {φ : p →ₗ[R] F} {ψ : q →ₗ[R] F} (u : p) :
ofIsCompl h φ ψ (u : E) = φ u := by simp [ofIsCompl]
@[simp]
theorem ofIsCompl_right_apply (h : IsCompl p q) {φ : p →ₗ[R] F} {ψ : q →ₗ[R] F} (v : q) :
ofIsCompl h φ ψ (v : E) = ψ v := by simp [ofIsCompl]
theorem ofIsCompl_eq (h : IsCompl p q) {φ : p →ₗ[R] F} {ψ : q →ₗ[R] F} {χ : E →ₗ[R] F}
(hφ : ∀ u, φ u = χ u) (hψ : ∀ u, ψ u = χ u) : ofIsCompl h φ ψ = χ := by
ext x
obtain ⟨_, _, rfl, _⟩ := existsUnique_add_of_isCompl h x
simp [ofIsCompl, hφ, hψ]
theorem ofIsCompl_eq' (h : IsCompl p q) {φ : p →ₗ[R] F} {ψ : q →ₗ[R] F} {χ : E →ₗ[R] F}
(hφ : φ = χ.comp p.subtype) (hψ : ψ = χ.comp q.subtype) : ofIsCompl h φ ψ = χ :=
ofIsCompl_eq h (fun _ => hφ.symm ▸ rfl) fun _ => hψ.symm ▸ rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofIsCompl_zero (h : IsCompl p q) : (ofIsCompl h 0 0 : E →ₗ[R] F) = 0 :=
ofIsCompl_eq _ (fun _ => rfl) fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofIsCompl_add (h : IsCompl p q) {φ₁ φ₂ : p →ₗ[R] F} {ψ₁ ψ₂ : q →ₗ[R] F} :
ofIsCompl h (φ₁ + φ₂) (ψ₁ + ψ₂) = ofIsCompl h φ₁ ψ₁ + ofIsCompl h φ₂ ψ₂ :=
ofIsCompl_eq _ (by simp) (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem ofIsCompl_smul {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {E : Type*} [AddCommGroup E] [Module R E]
{F : Type*} [AddCommGroup F] [Module R F] {p q : Submodule R E} (h : IsCompl p q)
{φ : p →ₗ[R] F} {ψ : q →ₗ[R] F} (c : R) : ofIsCompl h (c • φ) (c • ψ) = c • ofIsCompl h φ ψ :=
ofIsCompl_eq _ (by simp) (by simp)
section
variable {R₁ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] [Module R₁ E] [Module R₁ F]
/-- The linear map from `(p →ₗ[R₁] F) × (q →ₗ[R₁] F)` to `E →ₗ[R₁] F`. -/
def ofIsComplProd {p q : Submodule R₁ E} (h : IsCompl p q) :
(p →ₗ[R₁] F) × (q →ₗ[R₁] F) →ₗ[R₁] E →ₗ[R₁] F where
toFun φ := ofIsCompl h φ.1 φ.2
map_add' := by intro φ ψ; rw [Prod.snd_add, Prod.fst_add, ofIsCompl_add]
map_smul' := by intro c φ; simp [Prod.smul_snd, Prod.smul_fst, ofIsCompl_smul]
@[simp]
theorem ofIsComplProd_apply {p q : Submodule R₁ E} (h : IsCompl p q)
(φ : (p →ₗ[R₁] F) × (q →ₗ[R₁] F)) : ofIsComplProd h φ = ofIsCompl h φ.1 φ.2 :=
rfl
/-- The natural linear equivalence between `(p →ₗ[R₁] F) × (q →ₗ[R₁] F)` and `E →ₗ[R₁] F`. -/
def ofIsComplProdEquiv {p q : Submodule R₁ E} (h : IsCompl p q) :
((p →ₗ[R₁] F) × (q →ₗ[R₁] F)) ≃ₗ[R₁] E →ₗ[R₁] F :=
{ ofIsComplProd h with
invFun := fun φ => ⟨φ.domRestrict p, φ.domRestrict q⟩
left_inv := fun φ ↦ by
ext x
· exact ofIsCompl_left_apply h x
· exact ofIsCompl_right_apply h x
right_inv := fun φ ↦ by
ext x
obtain ⟨a, b, hab, _⟩ := existsUnique_add_of_isCompl h x
rw [← hab]; simp }
end
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note: linter claims that LHS doesn't simplify, but it does
-- It seems the side condition `hf` is not applied by `simpNF`.
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_of_proj (f : E →ₗ[R] p) (hf : ∀ x : p, f x = x) :
p.linearProjOfIsCompl (ker f) (isCompl_of_proj hf) = f := by
ext x
have : x ∈ p ⊔ (ker f) := by simp only [(isCompl_of_proj hf).sup_eq_top, mem_top]
rcases mem_sup'.1 this with ⟨x, y, rfl⟩
simp [hf]
/-- If `f : E →ₗ[R] F` and `g : E →ₗ[R] G` are two surjective linear maps and
their kernels are complement of each other, then `x ↦ (f x, g x)` defines
a linear equivalence `E ≃ₗ[R] F × G`. -/
def equivProdOfSurjectiveOfIsCompl (f : E →ₗ[R] F) (g : E →ₗ[R] G) (hf : range f = ⊤)
(hg : range g = ⊤) (hfg : IsCompl (ker f) (ker g)) : E ≃ₗ[R] F × G :=
LinearEquiv.ofBijective (f.prod g)
⟨by simp [← ker_eq_bot, hfg.inf_eq_bot], by
rw [← range_eq_top]
simp [range_prod_eq hfg.sup_eq_top, *]⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_equivProdOfSurjectiveOfIsCompl {f : E →ₗ[R] F} {g : E →ₗ[R] G} (hf : range f = ⊤)
(hg : range g = ⊤) (hfg : IsCompl (ker f) (ker g)) :
(equivProdOfSurjectiveOfIsCompl f g hf hg hfg : E →ₗ[R] F × G) = f.prod g := rfl
@[simp]
theorem equivProdOfSurjectiveOfIsCompl_apply {f : E →ₗ[R] F} {g : E →ₗ[R] G} (hf : range f = ⊤)
(hg : range g = ⊤) (hfg : IsCompl (ker f) (ker g)) (x : E) :
equivProdOfSurjectiveOfIsCompl f g hf hg hfg x = (f x, g x) := rfl
end LinearMap
namespace Submodule
open LinearMap
/-- Equivalence between submodules `q` such that `IsCompl p q` and linear maps `f : E →ₗ[R] p`
such that `∀ x : p, f x = x`. -/
def isComplEquivProj : { q // IsCompl p q } ≃ { f : E →ₗ[R] p // ∀ x : p, f x = x } where
toFun q := ⟨linearProjOfIsCompl p q q.2, linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_left q.2⟩
invFun f := ⟨ker (f : E →ₗ[R] p), isCompl_of_proj f.2⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨q, hq⟩ => by simp only [linearProjOfIsCompl_ker, Subtype.coe_mk]
right_inv := fun ⟨f, hf⟩ => Subtype.eq <| f.linearProjOfIsCompl_of_proj hf
@[simp]
theorem coe_isComplEquivProj_apply (q : { q // IsCompl p q }) :
(p.isComplEquivProj q : E →ₗ[R] p) = linearProjOfIsCompl p q q.2 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_isComplEquivProj_symm_apply (f : { f : E →ₗ[R] p // ∀ x : p, f x = x }) :
(p.isComplEquivProj.symm f : Submodule R E) = ker (f : E →ₗ[R] p) := rfl
/-- The idempotent endomorphisms of a module with range equal to a submodule are in 1-1
correspondence with linear maps to the submodule that restrict to the identity on the submodule. -/
@[simps] def isIdempotentElemEquiv :
{ f : Module.End R E // IsIdempotentElem f ∧ range f = p } ≃
{ f : E →ₗ[R] p // ∀ x : p, f x = x } where
toFun f := ⟨f.1.codRestrict _ fun x ↦ by simp_rw [← f.2.2]; exact mem_range_self f.1 x,
fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ↦ Subtype.ext <| by
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := f.2.2.symm ▸ hx
exact DFunLike.congr_fun f.2.1 x⟩
invFun f := ⟨p.subtype ∘ₗ f.1, LinearMap.ext fun x ↦ by simp [f.2], le_antisymm
((range_comp_le_range _ _).trans_eq p.range_subtype)
fun x hx ↦ ⟨x, Subtype.ext_iff.1 <| f.2 ⟨x, hx⟩⟩⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
end Submodule
namespace LinearMap
open Submodule
/--
A linear endomorphism of a module `E` is a projection onto a submodule `p` if it sends every element
of `E` to `p` and fixes every element of `p`.
The definition allow more generally any `FunLike` type and not just linear maps, so that it can be
used for example with `ContinuousLinearMap` or `Matrix`.
-/
structure IsProj {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M] (f : F) : Prop where
map_mem : ∀ x, f x ∈ m
map_id : ∀ x ∈ m, f x = x
theorem isProj_iff_isIdempotentElem (f : M →ₗ[S] M) :
(∃ p : Submodule S M, IsProj p f) ↔ IsIdempotentElem f := by
constructor
· intro ⟨p, hp⟩
ext x
exact hp.map_id (f x) (hp.map_mem x)
· intro h
use range f
constructor
· intro x
exact mem_range_self f x
· intro x hx
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := mem_range.1 hx
rw [← hy, ← Module.End.mul_apply, h]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-12")] alias isProj_iff_idempotent := isProj_iff_isIdempotentElem
namespace IsProj
variable {p m}
| /-- Restriction of the codomain of a projection of onto a subspace `p` to `p` instead of the whole
space.
-/
def codRestrict {f : M →ₗ[S] M} (h : IsProj m f) : M →ₗ[S] m :=
f.codRestrict m h.map_mem
@[simp]
theorem codRestrict_apply {f : M →ₗ[S] M} (h : IsProj m f) (x : M) : ↑(h.codRestrict x) = f x :=
f.codRestrict_apply m x
@[simp]
theorem codRestrict_apply_cod {f : M →ₗ[S] M} (h : IsProj m f) (x : m) : h.codRestrict x = x := by
ext
rw [codRestrict_apply]
exact h.map_id x x.2
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Projection.lean | 396 | 410 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Rémi Bottinelli. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémi Bottinelli
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Quiver.Prefunctor
/-!
# Pushing a quiver structure along a map
Given a map `σ : V → W` and a `Quiver` instance on `V`, this files defines a `Quiver` instance
on `W` by associating to each arrow `v ⟶ v'` in `V` an arrow `σ v ⟶ σ v'` in `W`.
-/
namespace Quiver
universe v v₁ v₂ u u₁ u₂
variable {V : Type*} [Quiver V] {W : Type*} (σ : V → W)
/-- The `Quiver` instance obtained by pushing arrows of `V` along the map `σ : V → W` -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def Push (_ : V → W) :=
W
instance [h : Nonempty W] : Nonempty (Push σ) :=
h
/-- The quiver structure obtained by pushing arrows of `V` along the map `σ : V → W` -/
inductive PushQuiver {V : Type u} [Quiver.{v} V] {W : Type u₂} (σ : V → W) : W → W → Type max u u₂ v
| arrow {X Y : V} (f : X ⟶ Y) : PushQuiver σ (σ X) (σ Y)
instance : Quiver (Push σ) :=
⟨PushQuiver σ⟩
namespace Push
/-- The prefunctor induced by pushing arrows via `σ` -/
def of : V ⥤q Push σ where
obj := σ
map f := PushQuiver.arrow f
@[simp]
theorem of_obj : (of σ).obj = σ :=
rfl
variable {W' : Type*} [Quiver W'] (φ : V ⥤q W') (τ : W → W') (h : ∀ x, φ.obj x = τ (σ x))
/-- Given a function `τ : W → W'` and a prefunctor `φ : V ⥤q W'`, one can extend `τ` to be
a prefunctor `W ⥤q W'` if `τ` and `σ` factorize `φ` at the level of objects, where `W` is given
the pushforward quiver structure `Push σ`. -/
noncomputable def lift : Push σ ⥤q W' where
obj := τ
map :=
@PushQuiver.rec V _ W σ (fun X Y _ => τ X ⟶ τ Y) @fun X Y f => by
dsimp only
rw [← h X, ← h Y]
exact φ.map f
theorem lift_obj : (lift σ φ τ h).obj = τ :=
rfl
theorem lift_comp : (of σ ⋙q lift σ φ τ h) = φ := by
fapply Prefunctor.ext
· rintro X
simp only [Prefunctor.comp_obj]
apply Eq.symm
exact h X
· rintro X Y f
simp only [Prefunctor.comp_map]
apply eq_of_heq
iterate 2 apply (cast_heq _ _).trans
apply HEq.symm
apply (eqRec_heq _ _).trans
have : ∀ {α γ} {β : α → γ → Sort _} {a a'} (p : a = a') g (b : β a g), HEq (p ▸ b) b := by
intros
subst_vars
rfl
apply this
theorem lift_unique (Φ : Push σ ⥤q W') (Φ₀ : Φ.obj = τ) (Φcomp : (of σ ⋙q Φ) = φ) :
Φ = lift σ φ τ h := by
dsimp only [of, lift]
fapply Prefunctor.ext
· intro X
simp only
rw [Φ₀]
· rintro _ _ ⟨⟩
subst_vars
| simp only [Prefunctor.comp_map, cast_eq]
rfl
end Push
end Quiver
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Quiver/Push.lean | 92 | 102 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Unbundled.Int
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Nonneg.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Unbundled.Rat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Operations
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection.Defs
/-!
# Nonnegative rationals
This file defines the nonnegative rationals as a subtype of `Rat` and provides its basic algebraic
order structure.
Note that `NNRat` is not declared as a `Semifield` here. See `Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Rat` for that
instance.
We also define an instance `CanLift ℚ ℚ≥0`. This instance can be used by the `lift` tactic to
replace `x : ℚ` and `hx : 0 ≤ x` in the proof context with `x : ℚ≥0` while replacing all occurrences
of `x` with `↑x`. This tactic also works for a function `f : α → ℚ` with a hypothesis
`hf : ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x`.
## Notation
`ℚ≥0` is notation for `NNRat` in locale `NNRat`.
## Huge warning
Whenever you state a lemma about the coercion `ℚ≥0 → ℚ`, check that Lean inserts `NNRat.cast`, not
`Subtype.val`. Else your lemma will never apply.
-/
assert_not_exists CompleteLattice OrderedCommMonoid
library_note "specialised high priority simp lemma" /--
It sometimes happens that a `@[simp]` lemma declared early in the library can be proved by `simp`
using later, more general simp lemmas. In that case, the following reasons might be arguments for
the early lemma to be tagged `@[simp high]` (rather than `@[simp, nolint simpNF]` or
un``@[simp]``ed):
1. There is a significant portion of the library which needs the early lemma to be available via
`simp` and which doesn't have access to the more general lemmas.
2. The more general lemmas have more complicated typeclass assumptions, causing rewrites with them
to be slower.
-/
open Function
instance Rat.instZeroLEOneClass : ZeroLEOneClass ℚ where
zero_le_one := rfl
instance Rat.instPosMulMono : PosMulMono ℚ where
elim := fun r p q h => by
simp only [mul_comm]
simpa [sub_mul, sub_nonneg] using Rat.mul_nonneg (sub_nonneg.2 h) r.2
deriving instance CommSemiring for NNRat
deriving instance LinearOrder for NNRat
deriving instance Sub for NNRat
deriving instance Inhabited for NNRat
namespace NNRat
variable {p q : ℚ≥0}
instance instNontrivial : Nontrivial ℚ≥0 where exists_pair_ne := ⟨1, 0, by decide⟩
instance instOrderBot : OrderBot ℚ≥0 where
bot := 0
bot_le q := q.2
@[simp] lemma val_eq_cast (q : ℚ≥0) : q.1 = q := rfl
instance instCharZero : CharZero ℚ≥0 where
cast_injective a b hab := by simpa using congr_arg num hab
instance canLift : CanLift ℚ ℚ≥0 (↑) fun q ↦ 0 ≤ q where
prf q hq := ⟨⟨q, hq⟩, rfl⟩
@[ext]
theorem ext : (p : ℚ) = (q : ℚ) → p = q :=
Subtype.ext
protected theorem coe_injective : Injective ((↑) : ℚ≥0 → ℚ) :=
Subtype.coe_injective
-- See note [specialised high priority simp lemma]
@[simp high, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inj : (p : ℚ) = q ↔ p = q :=
Subtype.coe_inj
theorem ne_iff {x y : ℚ≥0} : (x : ℚ) ≠ (y : ℚ) ↔ x ≠ y :=
NNRat.coe_inj.not
-- TODO: We have to write `NNRat.cast` explicitly, else the statement picks up `Subtype.val` instead
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_mk (q : ℚ) (hq) : NNRat.cast ⟨q, hq⟩ = q := rfl
lemma «forall» {p : ℚ≥0 → Prop} : (∀ q, p q) ↔ ∀ q hq, p ⟨q, hq⟩ := Subtype.forall
lemma «exists» {p : ℚ≥0 → Prop} : (∃ q, p q) ↔ ∃ q hq, p ⟨q, hq⟩ := Subtype.exists
/-- Reinterpret a rational number `q` as a non-negative rational number. Returns `0` if `q ≤ 0`. -/
def _root_.Rat.toNNRat (q : ℚ) : ℚ≥0 :=
⟨max q 0, le_max_right _ _⟩
theorem _root_.Rat.coe_toNNRat (q : ℚ) (hq : 0 ≤ q) : (q.toNNRat : ℚ) = q :=
max_eq_left hq
theorem _root_.Rat.le_coe_toNNRat (q : ℚ) : q ≤ q.toNNRat :=
le_max_left _ _
open Rat (toNNRat)
@[simp]
theorem coe_nonneg (q : ℚ≥0) : (0 : ℚ) ≤ q :=
q.2
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : ((0 : ℚ≥0) : ℚ) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma num_zero : num 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma den_zero : den 0 = 1 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_one : ((1 : ℚ≥0) : ℚ) = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma num_one : num 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma den_one : den 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add (p q : ℚ≥0) : ((p + q : ℚ≥0) : ℚ) = p + q :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul (p q : ℚ≥0) : ((p * q : ℚ≥0) : ℚ) = p * q :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_pow (q : ℚ≥0) (n : ℕ) : (↑(q ^ n) : ℚ) = (q : ℚ) ^ n :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma num_pow (q : ℚ≥0) (n : ℕ) : (q ^ n).num = q.num ^ n := by simp [num, Int.natAbs_pow]
@[simp] lemma den_pow (q : ℚ≥0) (n : ℕ) : (q ^ n).den = q.den ^ n := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub (h : q ≤ p) : ((p - q : ℚ≥0) : ℚ) = p - q :=
max_eq_left <| le_sub_comm.2 <| by rwa [sub_zero]
-- See note [specialised high priority simp lemma]
@[simp high]
theorem coe_eq_zero : (q : ℚ) = 0 ↔ q = 0 := by norm_cast
theorem coe_ne_zero : (q : ℚ) ≠ 0 ↔ q ≠ 0 :=
coe_eq_zero.not
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_le_coe : (p : ℚ) ≤ q ↔ p ≤ q :=
Iff.rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_lt_coe : (p : ℚ) < q ↔ p < q :=
Iff.rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_pos : (0 : ℚ) < q ↔ 0 < q :=
Iff.rfl
theorem coe_mono : Monotone ((↑) : ℚ≥0 → ℚ) :=
fun _ _ ↦ coe_le_coe.2
theorem toNNRat_mono : Monotone toNNRat :=
fun _ _ h ↦ max_le_max h le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem toNNRat_coe (q : ℚ≥0) : toNNRat q = q :=
ext <| max_eq_left q.2
@[simp]
theorem toNNRat_coe_nat (n : ℕ) : toNNRat n = n :=
ext <| by simp only [Nat.cast_nonneg', Rat.coe_toNNRat]; rfl
/-- `toNNRat` and `(↑) : ℚ≥0 → ℚ` form a Galois insertion. -/
protected def gi : GaloisInsertion toNNRat (↑) :=
GaloisInsertion.monotoneIntro coe_mono toNNRat_mono Rat.le_coe_toNNRat toNNRat_coe
/-- Coercion `ℚ≥0 → ℚ` as a `RingHom`. -/
def coeHom : ℚ≥0 →+* ℚ where
toFun := (↑)
map_one' := coe_one
map_mul' := coe_mul
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_natCast (n : ℕ) : (↑(↑n : ℚ≥0) : ℚ) = n := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_natCast (n : ℕ) : @Eq ℚ≥0 (⟨(n : ℚ), Nat.cast_nonneg' n⟩ : ℚ≥0) n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeHom : ⇑coeHom = ((↑) : ℚ≥0 → ℚ) :=
rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem nsmul_coe (q : ℚ≥0) (n : ℕ) : ↑(n • q) = n • (q : ℚ) :=
coeHom.toAddMonoidHom.map_nsmul _ _
theorem bddAbove_coe {s : Set ℚ≥0} : BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set ℚ) ↔ BddAbove s :=
⟨fun ⟨b, hb⟩ ↦
⟨toNNRat b, fun ⟨y, _⟩ hys ↦
show y ≤ max b 0 from (hb <| Set.mem_image_of_mem _ hys).trans <| le_max_left _ _⟩,
fun ⟨b, hb⟩ ↦ ⟨b, fun _ ⟨_, hx, Eq⟩ ↦ Eq ▸ hb hx⟩⟩
theorem bddBelow_coe (s : Set ℚ≥0) : BddBelow (((↑) : ℚ≥0 → ℚ) '' s) :=
⟨0, fun _ ⟨q, _, h⟩ ↦ h ▸ q.2⟩
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_max (x y : ℚ≥0) : ((max x y : ℚ≥0) : ℚ) = max (x : ℚ) (y : ℚ) :=
coe_mono.map_max
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_min (x y : ℚ≥0) : ((min x y : ℚ≥0) : ℚ) = min (x : ℚ) (y : ℚ) :=
coe_mono.map_min
theorem sub_def (p q : ℚ≥0) : p - q = toNNRat (p - q) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem abs_coe (q : ℚ≥0) : |(q : ℚ)| = q :=
abs_of_nonneg q.2
-- See note [specialised high priority simp lemma]
@[simp high]
theorem nonpos_iff_eq_zero (q : ℚ≥0) : q ≤ 0 ↔ q = 0 :=
⟨fun h => le_antisymm h q.2, fun h => h.symm ▸ q.2⟩
end NNRat
open NNRat
namespace Rat
variable {p q : ℚ}
@[simp]
theorem toNNRat_zero : toNNRat 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toNNRat_one : toNNRat 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toNNRat_pos : 0 < toNNRat q ↔ 0 < q := by simp [toNNRat, ← coe_lt_coe]
@[simp]
theorem toNNRat_eq_zero : toNNRat q = 0 ↔ q ≤ 0 := by
simpa [-toNNRat_pos] using (@toNNRat_pos q).not
alias ⟨_, toNNRat_of_nonpos⟩ := toNNRat_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem toNNRat_le_toNNRat_iff (hp : 0 ≤ p) : toNNRat q ≤ toNNRat p ↔ q ≤ p := by
simp [← coe_le_coe, toNNRat, hp]
@[simp]
theorem toNNRat_lt_toNNRat_iff' : toNNRat q < toNNRat p ↔ q < p ∧ 0 < p := by
simp [← coe_lt_coe, toNNRat, lt_irrefl]
theorem toNNRat_lt_toNNRat_iff (h : 0 < p) : toNNRat q < toNNRat p ↔ q < p :=
toNNRat_lt_toNNRat_iff'.trans (and_iff_left h)
theorem toNNRat_lt_toNNRat_iff_of_nonneg (hq : 0 ≤ q) : toNNRat q < toNNRat p ↔ q < p :=
toNNRat_lt_toNNRat_iff'.trans ⟨And.left, fun h ↦ ⟨h, hq.trans_lt h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem toNNRat_add (hq : 0 ≤ q) (hp : 0 ≤ p) : toNNRat (q + p) = toNNRat q + toNNRat p :=
NNRat.ext <| by simp [toNNRat, hq, hp, add_nonneg]
theorem toNNRat_add_le : toNNRat (q + p) ≤ toNNRat q + toNNRat p :=
coe_le_coe.1 <| max_le (add_le_add (le_max_left _ _) (le_max_left _ _)) <| coe_nonneg _
theorem toNNRat_le_iff_le_coe {p : ℚ≥0} : toNNRat q ≤ p ↔ q ≤ ↑p :=
NNRat.gi.gc q p
theorem le_toNNRat_iff_coe_le {q : ℚ≥0} (hp : 0 ≤ p) : q ≤ toNNRat p ↔ ↑q ≤ p := by
rw [← coe_le_coe, Rat.coe_toNNRat p hp]
theorem le_toNNRat_iff_coe_le' {q : ℚ≥0} (hq : 0 < q) : q ≤ toNNRat p ↔ ↑q ≤ p :=
(le_or_lt 0 p).elim le_toNNRat_iff_coe_le fun hp ↦ by
simp only [(hp.trans_le q.coe_nonneg).not_le, toNNRat_eq_zero.2 hp.le, hq.not_le]
theorem toNNRat_lt_iff_lt_coe {p : ℚ≥0} (hq : 0 ≤ q) : toNNRat q < p ↔ q < ↑p := by
rw [← coe_lt_coe, Rat.coe_toNNRat q hq]
theorem lt_toNNRat_iff_coe_lt {q : ℚ≥0} : q < toNNRat p ↔ ↑q < p :=
NNRat.gi.gc.lt_iff_lt
theorem toNNRat_mul (hp : 0 ≤ p) : toNNRat (p * q) = toNNRat p * toNNRat q := by
rcases le_total 0 q with hq | hq
· ext; simp [toNNRat, hp, hq, max_eq_left, mul_nonneg]
· have hpq := mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos hp hq
rw [toNNRat_eq_zero.2 hq, toNNRat_eq_zero.2 hpq, mul_zero]
end Rat
/-- The absolute value on `ℚ` as a map to `ℚ≥0`. -/
@[pp_nodot]
def Rat.nnabs (x : ℚ) : ℚ≥0 :=
⟨abs x, abs_nonneg x⟩
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem Rat.coe_nnabs (x : ℚ) : (Rat.nnabs x : ℚ) = abs x := rfl
/-! ### Numerator and denominator -/
namespace NNRat
variable {p q : ℚ≥0}
@[norm_cast] lemma num_coe (q : ℚ≥0) : (q : ℚ).num = q.num := by
simp only [num, Int.natCast_natAbs, Rat.num_nonneg, coe_nonneg, abs_of_nonneg]
theorem natAbs_num_coe : (q : ℚ).num.natAbs = q.num := rfl
@[norm_cast] lemma den_coe : (q : ℚ).den = q.den := rfl
@[simp] lemma num_ne_zero : q.num ≠ 0 ↔ q ≠ 0 := by simp [num]
@[simp] lemma num_pos : 0 < q.num ↔ 0 < q := by
simpa [num, -nonpos_iff_eq_zero] using nonpos_iff_eq_zero _ |>.not.symm
@[simp] lemma den_pos (q : ℚ≥0) : 0 < q.den := Rat.den_pos _
@[simp] lemma den_ne_zero (q : ℚ≥0) : q.den ≠ 0 := Rat.den_ne_zero _
lemma coprime_num_den (q : ℚ≥0) : q.num.Coprime q.den := by simpa [num, den] using Rat.reduced _
-- TODO: Rename `Rat.coe_nat_num`, `Rat.intCast_den`, `Rat.ofNat_num`, `Rat.ofNat_den`
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma num_natCast (n : ℕ) : num n = n := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma den_natCast (n : ℕ) : den n = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma num_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : num ofNat(n) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma den_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : den ofNat(n) = 1 := rfl
theorem ext_num_den (hn : p.num = q.num) (hd : p.den = q.den) : p = q := by
refine ext <| Rat.ext ?_ hd
simpa [num_coe]
theorem ext_num_den_iff : p = q ↔ p.num = q.num ∧ p.den = q.den :=
⟨by rintro rfl; exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, fun h ↦ ext_num_den h.1 h.2⟩
/-- Form the quotient `n / d` where `n d : ℕ`.
See also `Rat.divInt` and `mkRat`. -/
def divNat (n d : ℕ) : ℚ≥0 :=
⟨.divInt n d, Rat.divInt_nonneg (Int.ofNat_zero_le n) (Int.ofNat_zero_le d)⟩
variable {n₁ n₂ d₁ d₂ : ℕ}
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_divNat (n d : ℕ) : (divNat n d : ℚ) = .divInt n d := rfl
lemma mk_divInt (n d : ℕ) :
⟨.divInt n d, Rat.divInt_nonneg (Int.ofNat_zero_le n) (Int.ofNat_zero_le d)⟩ = divNat n d := rfl
lemma divNat_inj (h₁ : d₁ ≠ 0) (h₂ : d₂ ≠ 0) : divNat n₁ d₁ = divNat n₂ d₂ ↔ n₁ * d₂ = n₂ * d₁ := by
rw [← coe_inj]; simp [Rat.mkRat_eq_iff, h₁, h₂]; norm_cast
@[simp] lemma divNat_zero (n : ℕ) : divNat n 0 = 0 := by simp [divNat]; rfl
@[simp] lemma num_divNat_den (q : ℚ≥0) : divNat q.num q.den = q :=
ext <| by rw [← (q : ℚ).mkRat_num_den']; simp [num_coe, den_coe]
lemma natCast_eq_divNat (n : ℕ) : (n : ℚ≥0) = divNat n 1 := (num_divNat_den _).symm
lemma divNat_mul_divNat (n₁ n₂ : ℕ) {d₁ d₂} (hd₁ : d₁ ≠ 0) (hd₂ : d₂ ≠ 0) :
divNat n₁ d₁ * divNat n₂ d₂ = divNat (n₁ * n₂) (d₁ * d₂) := by
ext; push_cast; exact Rat.divInt_mul_divInt _ _ (mod_cast hd₁) (mod_cast hd₂)
lemma divNat_mul_left {a : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) (n d : ℕ) : divNat (a * n) (a * d) = divNat n d := by
ext; push_cast; exact Rat.divInt_mul_left (mod_cast ha)
lemma divNat_mul_right {a : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) (n d : ℕ) : divNat (n * a) (d * a) = divNat n d := by
ext; push_cast; exact Rat.divInt_mul_right (mod_cast ha)
@[simp] lemma mul_den_eq_num (q : ℚ≥0) : q * q.den = q.num := by
ext
push_cast
rw [← Int.cast_natCast, ← den_coe, ← Int.cast_natCast q.num, ← num_coe]
exact Rat.mul_den_eq_num _
@[simp] lemma den_mul_eq_num (q : ℚ≥0) : q.den * q = q.num := by rw [mul_comm, mul_den_eq_num]
/-- Define a (dependent) function or prove `∀ r : ℚ, p r` by dealing with nonnegative rational
numbers of the form `n / d` with `d ≠ 0` and `n`, `d` coprime. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def numDenCasesOn.{u} {C : ℚ≥0 → Sort u} (q) (H : ∀ n d, d ≠ 0 → n.Coprime d → C (divNat n d)) :
C q := by rw [← q.num_divNat_den]; exact H _ _ q.den_ne_zero q.coprime_num_den
lemma add_def (q r : ℚ≥0) : q + r = divNat (q.num * r.den + r.num * q.den) (q.den * r.den) := by
ext; simp [Rat.add_def', Rat.mkRat_eq_divInt, num_coe, den_coe]
lemma mul_def (q r : ℚ≥0) : q * r = divNat (q.num * r.num) (q.den * r.den) := by
ext; simp [Rat.mul_eq_mkRat, Rat.mkRat_eq_divInt, num_coe, den_coe]
theorem lt_def {p q : ℚ≥0} : p < q ↔ p.num * q.den < q.num * p.den := by
rw [← NNRat.coe_lt_coe, Rat.lt_def]; norm_cast
theorem le_def {p q : ℚ≥0} : p ≤ q ↔ p.num * q.den ≤ q.num * p.den := by
rw [← NNRat.coe_le_coe, Rat.le_def]; norm_cast
end NNRat
namespace Mathlib.Tactic.Qify
@[qify_simps] lemma nnratCast_eq (a b : ℚ≥0) : a = b ↔ (a : ℚ) = (b : ℚ) := NNRat.coe_inj.symm
@[qify_simps] lemma nnratCast_le (a b : ℚ≥0) : a ≤ b ↔ (a : ℚ) ≤ (b : ℚ) := NNRat.coe_le_coe.symm
@[qify_simps] lemma nnratCast_lt (a b : ℚ≥0) : a < b ↔ (a : ℚ) < (b : ℚ) := NNRat.coe_lt_coe.symm
@[qify_simps] lemma nnratCast_ne (a b : ℚ≥0) : a ≠ b ↔ (a : ℚ) ≠ (b : ℚ) := NNRat.ne_iff.symm
end Mathlib.Tactic.Qify
| Mathlib/Data/NNRat/Defs.lean | 449 | 450 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.MFDeriv.Defs
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.ContMDiff.Defs
/-!
# Basic properties of the manifold Fréchet derivative
In this file, we show various properties of the manifold Fréchet derivative,
mimicking the API for Fréchet derivatives.
- basic properties of unique differentiability sets
- various general lemmas about the manifold Fréchet derivative
- deducing differentiability from smoothness,
- deriving continuity from differentiability on manifolds,
- congruence lemmas for derivatives on manifolds
- composition lemmas and the chain rule
-/
noncomputable section
assert_not_exists tangentBundleCore
open scoped Topology Manifold
open Set Bundle ChartedSpace
section DerivativesProperties
/-! ### Unique differentiability sets in manifolds -/
variable
{𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
{H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H)
{M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
{E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E']
{H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H'] {I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'}
{M' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M'] [ChartedSpace H' M']
{E'' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E''] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'']
{H'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H''] {I'' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E'' H''}
{M'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M''] [ChartedSpace H'' M'']
{f f₁ : M → M'} {x : M} {s t : Set M} {g : M' → M''} {u : Set M'}
theorem uniqueMDiffWithinAt_univ : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I univ x := by
unfold UniqueMDiffWithinAt
simp only [preimage_univ, univ_inter]
exact I.uniqueDiffOn _ (mem_range_self _)
variable {I}
theorem uniqueMDiffWithinAt_iff_inter_range {s : Set M} {x : M} :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x ↔
UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I)
((extChartAt I x) x) := Iff.rfl
theorem uniqueMDiffWithinAt_iff {s : Set M} {x : M} :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x ↔
UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ (extChartAt I x).target)
((extChartAt I x) x) := by
apply uniqueDiffWithinAt_congr
rw [nhdsWithin_inter, nhdsWithin_inter, nhdsWithin_extChartAt_target_eq]
nonrec theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono_nhds {s t : Set M} {x : M} (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x)
(ht : 𝓝[s] x ≤ 𝓝[t] x) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I t x :=
hs.mono_nhds <| by simpa only [← map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin] using Filter.map_mono ht
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin {s t : Set M} {x : M}
(hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I t x :=
hs.mono_nhds (nhdsWithin_le_iff.2 ht)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")]
alias UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono_of_mem := UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono (h : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (st : s ⊆ t) :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I t x :=
UniqueDiffWithinAt.mono h <| inter_subset_inter (preimage_mono st) (Subset.refl _)
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.inter' (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I (s ∩ t) x :=
hs.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin (Filter.inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin ht)
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.inter (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I (s ∩ t) x :=
hs.inter' (nhdsWithin_le_nhds ht)
theorem IsOpen.uniqueMDiffWithinAt (hs : IsOpen s) (xs : x ∈ s) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x :=
(uniqueMDiffWithinAt_univ I).mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin <| nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| hs.mem_nhds xs
theorem UniqueMDiffOn.inter (hs : UniqueMDiffOn I s) (ht : IsOpen t) : UniqueMDiffOn I (s ∩ t) :=
fun _x hx => UniqueMDiffWithinAt.inter (hs _ hx.1) (ht.mem_nhds hx.2)
theorem IsOpen.uniqueMDiffOn (hs : IsOpen s) : UniqueMDiffOn I s :=
fun _x hx => hs.uniqueMDiffWithinAt hx
theorem uniqueMDiffOn_univ : UniqueMDiffOn I (univ : Set M) :=
isOpen_univ.uniqueMDiffOn
nonrec theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.prod {x : M} {y : M'} {s t} (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x)
(ht : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I' t y) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt (I.prod I') (s ×ˢ t) (x, y) := by
refine (hs.prod ht).mono ?_
rw [ModelWithCorners.range_prod, ← prod_inter_prod]
rfl
theorem UniqueMDiffOn.prod {s : Set M} {t : Set M'} (hs : UniqueMDiffOn I s)
(ht : UniqueMDiffOn I' t) : UniqueMDiffOn (I.prod I') (s ×ˢ t) := fun x h ↦
(hs x.1 h.1).prod (ht x.2 h.2)
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.mono (hst : s ⊆ t) (h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f t x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x :=
⟨ContinuousWithinAt.mono h.1 hst, DifferentiableWithinAt.mono
h.differentiableWithinAt_writtenInExtChartAt
(inter_subset_inter_left _ (preimage_mono hst))⟩
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f univ x ↔ MDifferentiableAt I I' f x := by
simp_rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, MDifferentiableAt, ChartedSpace.LiftPropAt]
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f (s ∩ t) x ↔ MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x := by
rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, MDifferentiableWithinAt,
differentiableWithinAt_localInvariantProp.liftPropWithinAt_inter ht]
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter' (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f (s ∩ t) x ↔ MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x := by
rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, MDifferentiableWithinAt,
differentiableWithinAt_localInvariantProp.liftPropWithinAt_inter' ht]
theorem MDifferentiableAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt (h : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x :=
MDifferentiableWithinAt.mono (subset_univ _) (mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ.2 h)
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.mdifferentiableAt (h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x)
(hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x := by
have : s = univ ∩ s := by rw [univ_inter]
rwa [this, mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter hs, mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ] at h
theorem MDifferentiableOn.mono (h : MDifferentiableOn I I' f t) (st : s ⊆ t) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s := fun x hx => (h x (st hx)).mono st
theorem mdifferentiableOn_univ : MDifferentiableOn I I' f univ ↔ MDifferentiable I I' f := by
simp only [MDifferentiableOn, mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ, mfld_simps]; rfl
theorem MDifferentiableOn.mdifferentiableAt (h : MDifferentiableOn I I' f s) (hx : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x :=
(h x (mem_of_mem_nhds hx)).mdifferentiableAt hx
theorem MDifferentiable.mdifferentiableOn (h : MDifferentiable I I' f) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s :=
(mdifferentiableOn_univ.2 h).mono (subset_univ _)
theorem mdifferentiableOn_of_locally_mdifferentiableOn
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ x ∈ u ∧ MDifferentiableOn I I' f (s ∩ u)) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s := by
intro x xs
rcases h x xs with ⟨t, t_open, xt, ht⟩
exact (mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter (t_open.mem_nhds xt)).1 (ht x ⟨xs, xt⟩)
theorem MDifferentiable.mdifferentiableAt (hf : MDifferentiable I I' f) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x :=
hf x
/-!
### Relating differentiability in a manifold and differentiability in the model space
through extended charts
-/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_target_inter {f : M → M'} {s : Set M} {x : M} :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (writtenInExtChartAt I I' x f)
((extChartAt I x).target ∩ (extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s) ((extChartAt I x) x) := by
rw [mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff']
refine and_congr Iff.rfl (exists_congr fun f' => ?_)
rw [inter_comm]
simp only [HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_inter, nhdsWithin_extChartAt_target_eq]
/-- One can reformulate smoothness within a set at a point as continuity within this set at this
point, and smoothness in the corresponding extended chart. -/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (extChartAt I x x) := by
simp_rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, ChartedSpace.liftPropWithinAt_iff']; rfl
/-- One can reformulate smoothness within a set at a point as continuity within this set at this
point, and smoothness in the corresponding extended chart. This form states smoothness of `f`
written in such a way that the set is restricted to lie within the domain/codomain of the
corresponding charts.
Even though this expression is more complicated than the one in `mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff`, it is
a smaller set, but their germs at `extChartAt I x x` are equal. It is sometimes useful to rewrite
using this in the goal.
-/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_target_inter' :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).target ∩
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' (f x)).source))
(extChartAt I x x) := by
simp only [MDifferentiableWithinAt, liftPropWithinAt_iff']
exact and_congr_right fun hc => differentiableWithinAt_congr_nhds <|
hc.nhdsWithin_extChartAt_symm_preimage_inter_range
/-- One can reformulate smoothness within a set at a point as continuity within this set at this
point, and smoothness in the corresponding extended chart in the target. -/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_target :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
MDifferentiableWithinAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f) s x := by
simp_rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, liftPropWithinAt_iff', ← and_assoc]
have cont :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧ ContinuousWithinAt (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f) s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
and_iff_left_of_imp <| (continuousAt_extChartAt _).comp_continuousWithinAt
simp_rw [cont, DifferentiableWithinAtProp, extChartAt, PartialHomeomorph.extend,
PartialEquiv.coe_trans,
ModelWithCorners.toPartialEquiv_coe, PartialHomeomorph.coe_coe, modelWithCornersSelf_coe,
chartAt_self_eq, PartialHomeomorph.refl_apply]
rfl
theorem mdifferentiableAt_iff_target {x : M} :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x ↔
ContinuousAt f x ∧ MDifferentiableAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f) x := by
rw [← mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ, ← mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ,
mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_target, continuousWithinAt_univ]
section IsManifold
variable {e : PartialHomeomorph M H} {e' : PartialHomeomorph M' H'}
open IsManifold
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_source_of_mem_maximalAtlas
[IsManifold I 1 M] (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I 1 M) (hx : x ∈ e.source) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
MDifferentiableWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) I' (f ∘ (e.extend I).symm) ((e.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I)
(e.extend I x) := by
have h2x := hx; rw [← e.extend_source (I := I)] at h2x
simp_rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt,
differentiableWithinAt_localInvariantProp.liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart_source he hx,
StructureGroupoid.liftPropWithinAt_self_source,
e.extend_symm_continuousWithinAt_comp_right_iff, differentiableWithinAtProp_self_source,
DifferentiableWithinAtProp, Function.comp, e.left_inv hx, (e.extend I).left_inv h2x]
rfl
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_source_of_mem_source
[IsManifold I 1 M] {x' : M} (hx' : x' ∈ (chartAt H x).source) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x' ↔
MDifferentiableWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) I' (f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (extChartAt I x x') :=
mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_source_of_mem_maximalAtlas (chart_mem_maximalAtlas x) hx'
theorem mdifferentiableAt_iff_source_of_mem_source
[IsManifold I 1 M] {x' : M} (hx' : x' ∈ (chartAt H x).source) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x' ↔
MDifferentiableWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) I' (f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm) (range I)
(extChartAt I x x') := by
simp_rw [← mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ, mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_source_of_mem_source hx',
preimage_univ, univ_inter]
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_target_of_mem_source
[IsManifold I' 1 M'] {x : M} {y : M'} (hy : f x ∈ (chartAt H' y).source) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧ MDifferentiableWithinAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') (extChartAt I' y ∘ f) s x := by
simp_rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt]
rw [differentiableWithinAt_localInvariantProp.liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart_target
(chart_mem_maximalAtlas y) hy,
and_congr_right]
intro hf
simp_rw [StructureGroupoid.liftPropWithinAt_self_target]
simp_rw [((chartAt H' y).continuousAt hy).comp_continuousWithinAt hf]
rw [← extChartAt_source I'] at hy
simp_rw [(continuousAt_extChartAt' hy).comp_continuousWithinAt hf]
rfl
theorem mdifferentiableAt_iff_target_of_mem_source
[IsManifold I' 1 M'] {x : M} {y : M'} (hy : f x ∈ (chartAt H' y).source) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x ↔
ContinuousAt f x ∧ MDifferentiableAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') (extChartAt I' y ∘ f) x := by
rw [← mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ, mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_target_of_mem_source hy,
continuousWithinAt_univ, ← mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ]
variable [IsManifold I 1 M] [IsManifold I' 1 M']
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas {x : M} (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I 1 M)
(he' : e' ∈ maximalAtlas I' 1 M') (hx : x ∈ e.source) (hy : f x ∈ e'.source) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (e'.extend I' ∘ f ∘ (e.extend I).symm)
((e.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (e.extend I x) :=
differentiableWithinAt_localInvariantProp.liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart he hx he' hy
/-- An alternative formulation of `mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas`
if the set if `s` lies in `e.source`. -/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_image {x : M} (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I 1 M)
(he' : e' ∈ maximalAtlas I' 1 M') (hs : s ⊆ e.source) (hx : x ∈ e.source)
(hy : f x ∈ e'.source) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (e'.extend I' ∘ f ∘ (e.extend I).symm) (e.extend I '' s)
(e.extend I x) := by
rw [mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas he he' hx hy, and_congr_right_iff]
refine fun _ => differentiableWithinAt_congr_nhds ?_
simp_rw [nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq, e.extend_symm_preimage_inter_range_eventuallyEq hs hx]
/-- One can reformulate smoothness within a set at a point as continuity within this set at this
point, and smoothness in any chart containing that point. -/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_source {x' : M} {y : M'} (hx : x' ∈ (chartAt H x).source)
(hy : f x' ∈ (chartAt H' y).source) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x' ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x' ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (extChartAt I x x') :=
mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas (chart_mem_maximalAtlas x)
(chart_mem_maximalAtlas y) hx hy
/-- One can reformulate smoothness within a set at a point as continuity within this set at this
point, and smoothness in any chart containing that point. Version requiring differentiability
in the target instead of `range I`. -/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_source' {x' : M} {y : M'}
(hx : x' ∈ (chartAt H x).source) (hy : f x' ∈ (chartAt H' y).source) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x' ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x' ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).target ∩ (extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' y).source))
(extChartAt I x x') := by
refine (mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_source hx hy).trans ?_
rw [← extChartAt_source I] at hx
rw [← extChartAt_source I'] at hy
rw [and_congr_right_iff]
set e := extChartAt I x; set e' := extChartAt I' (f x)
refine fun hc => differentiableWithinAt_congr_nhds ?_
rw [← e.image_source_inter_eq', ← map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin_eq_image' hx,
← map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin' hx, inter_comm, nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem]
exact hc (extChartAt_source_mem_nhds' hy)
theorem mdifferentiableAt_iff_of_mem_source {x' : M} {y : M'} (hx : x' ∈ (chartAt H x).source)
(hy : f x' ∈ (chartAt H' y).source) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x' ↔
ContinuousAt f x' ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm) (range I)
(extChartAt I x x') :=
(mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_source hx hy).trans <| by
rw [continuousWithinAt_univ, preimage_univ, univ_inter]
theorem mdifferentiableOn_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I 1 M)
(he' : e' ∈ maximalAtlas I' 1 M') (hs : s ⊆ e.source) (h2s : MapsTo f s e'.source) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s ↔
ContinuousOn f s ∧
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (e'.extend I' ∘ f ∘ (e.extend I).symm) (e.extend I '' s) := by
simp_rw [ContinuousOn, DifferentiableOn, Set.forall_mem_image, ← forall_and, MDifferentiableOn]
exact forall₂_congr fun x hx => mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_image he he' hs (hs hx) (h2s hx)
/-- Differentiability on a set is equivalent to differentiability in the extended charts. -/
theorem mdifferentiableOn_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas' (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I 1 M)
(he' : e' ∈ maximalAtlas I' 1 M') (hs : s ⊆ e.source) (h2s : MapsTo f s e'.source) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s ↔
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (e'.extend I' ∘ f ∘ (e.extend I).symm) (e.extend I '' s) :=
(mdifferentiableOn_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas he he' hs h2s).trans <| and_iff_right_of_imp fun h ↦
(e.continuousOn_writtenInExtend_iff hs h2s).1 h.continuousOn
/-- If the set where you want `f` to be smooth lies entirely in a single chart, and `f` maps it
into a single chart, the smoothness of `f` on that set can be expressed by purely looking in
these charts.
Note: this lemma uses `extChartAt I x '' s` instead of `(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s` to ensure
that this set lies in `(extChartAt I x).target`. -/
theorem mdifferentiableOn_iff_of_subset_source {x : M} {y : M'} (hs : s ⊆ (chartAt H x).source)
(h2s : MapsTo f s (chartAt H' y).source) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s ↔
ContinuousOn f s ∧
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm) (extChartAt I x '' s) :=
mdifferentiableOn_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas (chart_mem_maximalAtlas x)
(chart_mem_maximalAtlas y) hs h2s
/-- If the set where you want `f` to be smooth lies entirely in a single chart, and `f` maps it
into a single chart, the smoothness of `f` on that set can be expressed by purely looking in
these charts.
Note: this lemma uses `extChartAt I x '' s` instead of `(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s` to ensure
that this set lies in `(extChartAt I x).target`. -/
theorem mdifferentiableOn_iff_of_subset_source' {x : M} {y : M'} (hs : s ⊆ (extChartAt I x).source)
(h2s : MapsTo f s (extChartAt I' y).source) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s ↔
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm) (extChartAt I x '' s) := by
rw [extChartAt_source] at hs h2s
exact mdifferentiableOn_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas' (chart_mem_maximalAtlas x)
(chart_mem_maximalAtlas y) hs h2s
/-- One can reformulate smoothness on a set as continuity on this set, and smoothness in any
extended chart. -/
theorem mdifferentiableOn_iff :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s ↔
ContinuousOn f s ∧
∀ (x : M) (y : M'),
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).target ∩
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' y).source)) := by
constructor
· intro h
refine ⟨fun x hx => (h x hx).1, fun x y z hz => ?_⟩
simp only [mfld_simps] at hz
let w := (extChartAt I x).symm z
have : w ∈ s := by simp only [w, hz, mfld_simps]
specialize h w this
have w1 : w ∈ (chartAt H x).source := by simp only [w, hz, mfld_simps]
have w2 : f w ∈ (chartAt H' y).source := by simp only [w, hz, mfld_simps]
convert ((mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_source w1 w2).mp h).2.mono _
· simp only [w, hz, mfld_simps]
· mfld_set_tac
· rintro ⟨hcont, hdiff⟩ x hx
refine differentiableWithinAt_localInvariantProp.liftPropWithinAt_iff.mpr ?_
refine ⟨hcont x hx, ?_⟩
dsimp [DifferentiableWithinAtProp]
convert hdiff x (f x) (extChartAt I x x) (by simp only [hx, mfld_simps]) using 1
mfld_set_tac
/-- One can reformulate smoothness on a set as continuity on this set, and smoothness in any
extended chart in the target. -/
theorem mdifferentiableOn_iff_target :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s ↔
ContinuousOn f s ∧
∀ y : M', MDifferentiableOn I 𝓘(𝕜, E') (extChartAt I' y ∘ f)
(s ∩ f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' y).source) := by
simp only [mdifferentiableOn_iff, ModelWithCorners.source_eq, chartAt_self_eq,
PartialHomeomorph.refl_partialEquiv, PartialEquiv.refl_trans, extChartAt,
PartialHomeomorph.extend, Set.preimage_univ, Set.inter_univ, and_congr_right_iff]
intro h
constructor
· refine fun h' y => ⟨?_, fun x _ => h' x y⟩
have h'' : ContinuousOn _ univ := (ModelWithCorners.continuous I').continuousOn
convert (h''.comp_inter (chartAt H' y).continuousOn_toFun).comp_inter h
simp
· exact fun h' x y => (h' y).2 x 0
/-- One can reformulate smoothness as continuity and smoothness in any extended chart. -/
theorem mdifferentiable_iff :
MDifferentiable I I' f ↔
Continuous f ∧
∀ (x : M) (y : M'),
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).target ∩
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' (f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' y).source)) := by
simp [← mdifferentiableOn_univ, mdifferentiableOn_iff, continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ]
/-- One can reformulate smoothness as continuity and smoothness in any extended chart in the
target. -/
theorem mdifferentiable_iff_target :
MDifferentiable I I' f ↔
Continuous f ∧ ∀ y : M',
MDifferentiableOn I 𝓘(𝕜, E') (extChartAt I' y ∘ f) (f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' y).source) := by
rw [← mdifferentiableOn_univ, mdifferentiableOn_iff_target]
simp [continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ]
end IsManifold
/-! ### Deducing differentiability from smoothness -/
variable {n : WithTop ℕ∞}
theorem ContMDiffWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt (hf : ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x)
(hn : 1 ≤ n) : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x := by
suffices h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f (s ∩ f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' (f x)).source) x by
rwa [mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter'] at h
apply hf.1.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin
exact extChartAt_source_mem_nhds (f x)
rw [mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff]
exact ⟨hf.1.mono inter_subset_left, (hf.2.differentiableWithinAt (mod_cast hn)).mono
(by mfld_set_tac)⟩
theorem ContMDiffAt.mdifferentiableAt (hf : ContMDiffAt I I' n f x) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x :=
mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ.1 <| ContMDiffWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt hf hn
theorem ContMDiff.mdifferentiableAt (hf : ContMDiff I I' n f) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x :=
hf.contMDiffAt.mdifferentiableAt hn
theorem ContMDiff.mdifferentiableWithinAt (hf : ContMDiff I I' n f) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x :=
(hf.contMDiffAt.mdifferentiableAt hn).mdifferentiableWithinAt
theorem ContMDiffOn.mdifferentiableOn (hf : ContMDiffOn I I' n f s) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).mdifferentiableWithinAt hn
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")]
alias SmoothWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt := ContMDiffWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt
theorem ContMDiff.mdifferentiable (hf : ContMDiff I I' n f) (hn : 1 ≤ n) : MDifferentiable I I' f :=
fun x => (hf x).mdifferentiableAt hn
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")]
alias SmoothAt.mdifferentiableAt := ContMDiffAt.mdifferentiableAt
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")]
alias SmoothOn.mdifferentiableOn := ContMDiffOn.mdifferentiableOn
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")]
alias Smooth.mdifferentiable := ContMDiff.mdifferentiable
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")]
alias Smooth.mdifferentiableAt := ContMDiff.mdifferentiableAt
theorem MDifferentiableOn.continuousOn (h : MDifferentiableOn I I' f s) : ContinuousOn f s :=
fun x hx => (h x hx).continuousWithinAt
theorem MDifferentiable.continuous (h : MDifferentiable I I' f) : Continuous f :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun x => (h x).continuousAt
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")]
alias Smooth.mdifferentiableWithinAt := ContMDiff.mdifferentiableWithinAt
/-! ### Deriving continuity from differentiability on manifolds -/
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.prodMk {f : M → M'} {g : M → M''}
(hf : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x) (hg : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I'' g s x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I (I'.prod I'') (fun x => (f x, g x)) s x :=
⟨hf.1.prodMk hg.1, hf.2.prodMk hg.2⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-08")]
alias MDifferentiableWithinAt.prod_mk := MDifferentiableWithinAt.prodMk
theorem MDifferentiableAt.prodMk {f : M → M'} {g : M → M''} (hf : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x)
(hg : MDifferentiableAt I I'' g x) :
MDifferentiableAt I (I'.prod I'') (fun x => (f x, g x)) x :=
⟨hf.1.prodMk hg.1, hf.2.prodMk hg.2⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-08")]
alias MDifferentiableAt.prod_mk := MDifferentiableAt.prodMk
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.prodMk_space {f : M → E'} {g : M → E''}
(hf : MDifferentiableWithinAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') f s x)
(hg : MDifferentiableWithinAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E'') g s x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E' × E'') (fun x => (f x, g x)) s x :=
⟨hf.1.prodMk hg.1, hf.2.prodMk hg.2⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-08")]
alias MDifferentiableWithinAt.prod_mk_space := MDifferentiableWithinAt.prodMk_space
theorem MDifferentiableAt.prodMk_space {f : M → E'} {g : M → E''}
(hf : MDifferentiableAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') f x) (hg : MDifferentiableAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E'') g x) :
MDifferentiableAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E' × E'') (fun x => (f x, g x)) x :=
⟨hf.1.prodMk hg.1, hf.2.prodMk hg.2⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-08")]
alias MDifferentiableAt.prod_mk_space := MDifferentiableAt.prodMk_space
theorem MDifferentiableOn.prodMk {f : M → M'} {g : M → M''} (hf : MDifferentiableOn I I' f s)
(hg : MDifferentiableOn I I'' g s) :
MDifferentiableOn I (I'.prod I'') (fun x => (f x, g x)) s := fun x hx =>
(hf x hx).prodMk (hg x hx)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-08")]
alias MDifferentiableOn.prod_mk := MDifferentiableOn.prodMk
theorem MDifferentiable.prodMk {f : M → M'} {g : M → M''} (hf : MDifferentiable I I' f)
(hg : MDifferentiable I I'' g) : MDifferentiable I (I'.prod I'') fun x => (f x, g x) := fun x =>
(hf x).prodMk (hg x)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-08")]
alias MDifferentiable.prod_mk := MDifferentiable.prodMk
theorem MDifferentiableOn.prodMk_space {f : M → E'} {g : M → E''}
(hf : MDifferentiableOn I 𝓘(𝕜, E') f s) (hg : MDifferentiableOn I 𝓘(𝕜, E'') g s) :
MDifferentiableOn I 𝓘(𝕜, E' × E'') (fun x => (f x, g x)) s := fun x hx =>
(hf x hx).prodMk_space (hg x hx)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-08")]
alias MDifferentiableOn.prod_mk_space := MDifferentiableOn.prodMk_space
theorem MDifferentiable.prodMk_space {f : M → E'} {g : M → E''} (hf : MDifferentiable I 𝓘(𝕜, E') f)
(hg : MDifferentiable I 𝓘(𝕜, E'') g) : MDifferentiable I 𝓘(𝕜, E' × E'') fun x => (f x, g x) :=
fun x => (hf x).prodMk_space (hg x)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-08")]
alias MDifferentiable.prod_mk_space := MDifferentiable.prodMk_space
theorem writtenInExtChartAt_comp (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
{y | writtenInExtChartAt I I'' x (g ∘ f) y =
(writtenInExtChartAt I' I'' (f x) g ∘ writtenInExtChartAt I I' x f) y} ∈
𝓝[(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] (extChartAt I x) x := by
apply
@Filter.mem_of_superset _ _ (f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' (f x)).source) _
(extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin
(h.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin (extChartAt_source_mem_nhds _)))
mfld_set_tac
variable {f' f₀' f₁' : TangentSpace I x →L[𝕜] TangentSpace I' (f x)}
{g' : TangentSpace I' (f x) →L[𝕜] TangentSpace I'' (g (f x))}
/-- `UniqueMDiffWithinAt` achieves its goal: it implies the uniqueness of the derivative. -/
protected nonrec theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.eq (U : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x)
(h : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f') (h₁ : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f₁') : f' = f₁' := by
-- Porting note: didn't need `convert` because of finding instances by unification
convert U.eq h.2 h₁.2
protected theorem UniqueMDiffOn.eq (U : UniqueMDiffOn I s) (hx : x ∈ s)
(h : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f') (h₁ : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f₁') : f' = f₁' :=
UniqueMDiffWithinAt.eq (U _ hx) h h₁
/-!
### General lemmas on derivatives of functions between manifolds
We mimic the API for functions between vector spaces
-/
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mfderivWithin_univ : mfderivWithin I I' f univ = mfderiv I I' f := by
ext x : 1
simp only [mfderivWithin, mfderiv, mfld_simps]
rw [mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ]
theorem mfderivWithin_zero_of_not_mdifferentiableWithinAt
(h : ¬MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x) : mfderivWithin I I' f s x = 0 := by
simp only [mfderivWithin, h, if_neg, not_false_iff]
theorem mfderiv_zero_of_not_mdifferentiableAt (h : ¬MDifferentiableAt I I' f x) :
mfderiv I I' f x = 0 := by simp only [mfderiv, h, if_neg, not_false_iff]
theorem mdifferentiable_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton E] : MDifferentiable I I' f := by
intro x
have : Subsingleton H := I.injective.subsingleton
have : DiscreteTopology M := discreteTopology H M
simp only [mdifferentiableAt_iff, continuous_of_discreteTopology.continuousAt, true_and]
exact (hasFDerivAt_of_subsingleton _ _).differentiableAt.differentiableWithinAt
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_of_isInvertible_mfderivWithin
(hf : (mfderivWithin I I' f s x).IsInvertible) : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x := by
contrapose hf
rw [mfderivWithin_zero_of_not_mdifferentiableWithinAt hf]
contrapose! hf
rcases ContinuousLinearMap.isInvertible_zero_iff.1 hf with ⟨hE, hF⟩
have : Subsingleton E := hE
exact mdifferentiable_of_subsingleton.mdifferentiableAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt
theorem mdifferentiableAt_of_isInvertible_mfderiv
(hf : (mfderiv I I' f x).IsInvertible) : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x := by
simp only [← mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ, ← mfderivWithin_univ] at hf ⊢
exact mdifferentiableWithinAt_of_isInvertible_mfderivWithin hf
theorem HasMFDerivWithinAt.mono (h : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f t x f') (hst : s ⊆ t) :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f' :=
⟨ContinuousWithinAt.mono h.1 hst,
HasFDerivWithinAt.mono h.2 (inter_subset_inter (preimage_mono hst) (Subset.refl _))⟩
theorem HasMFDerivAt.hasMFDerivWithinAt (h : HasMFDerivAt I I' f x f') :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f' :=
⟨ContinuousAt.continuousWithinAt h.1, HasFDerivWithinAt.mono h.2 inter_subset_right⟩
theorem HasMFDerivWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt (h : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f') :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x :=
⟨h.1, ⟨f', h.2⟩⟩
theorem HasMFDerivAt.mdifferentiableAt (h : HasMFDerivAt I I' f x f') :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x := by
rw [mdifferentiableAt_iff]
exact ⟨h.1, ⟨f', h.2⟩⟩
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem hasMFDerivWithinAt_univ :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f univ x f' ↔ HasMFDerivAt I I' f x f' := by
simp only [HasMFDerivWithinAt, HasMFDerivAt, continuousWithinAt_univ, mfld_simps]
theorem hasMFDerivAt_unique (h₀ : HasMFDerivAt I I' f x f₀') (h₁ : HasMFDerivAt I I' f x f₁') :
f₀' = f₁' := by
rw [← hasMFDerivWithinAt_univ] at h₀ h₁
exact (uniqueMDiffWithinAt_univ I).eq h₀ h₁
theorem hasMFDerivWithinAt_inter' (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f (s ∩ t) x f' ↔ HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f' := by
rw [HasMFDerivWithinAt, HasMFDerivWithinAt, extChartAt_preimage_inter_eq,
hasFDerivWithinAt_inter', continuousWithinAt_inter' h]
exact extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin h
theorem hasMFDerivWithinAt_inter (h : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f (s ∩ t) x f' ↔ HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f' := by
rw [HasMFDerivWithinAt, HasMFDerivWithinAt, extChartAt_preimage_inter_eq, hasFDerivWithinAt_inter,
continuousWithinAt_inter h]
exact extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhds h
theorem HasMFDerivWithinAt.union (hs : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f')
(ht : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f t x f') : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f (s ∪ t) x f' := by
constructor
· exact ContinuousWithinAt.union hs.1 ht.1
· convert HasFDerivWithinAt.union hs.2 ht.2 using 1
simp only [union_inter_distrib_right, preimage_union]
theorem HasMFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
(h : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f') (ht : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x) :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f t x f' :=
(hasMFDerivWithinAt_inter' ht).1 (h.mono inter_subset_right)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")]
alias HasMFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem := HasMFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem HasMFDerivWithinAt.hasMFDerivAt (h : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f') (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasMFDerivAt I I' f x f' := by
rwa [← univ_inter s, hasMFDerivWithinAt_inter hs, hasMFDerivWithinAt_univ] at h
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.hasMFDerivWithinAt (h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x) :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x (mfderivWithin I I' f s x) := by
refine ⟨h.1, ?_⟩
simp only [mfderivWithin, h, if_pos, mfld_simps]
exact DifferentiableWithinAt.hasFDerivWithinAt h.2
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_exists_hasMFDerivWithinAt :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔ ∃ f', HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f' := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨mfderivWithin I I' f s x, h.hasMFDerivWithinAt⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨f', hf'⟩
exact hf'.mdifferentiableWithinAt
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
(h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x) {t : Set M}
(hst : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x) : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f t x :=
(h.hasMFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin hst).mdifferentiableWithinAt
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.congr_nhds (h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x) {t : Set M}
(hst : 𝓝[s] x = 𝓝[t] x) : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f t x :=
h.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin <| hst ▸ self_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_congr_nhds {t : Set M} (hst : 𝓝[s] x = 𝓝[t] x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔ MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f t x :=
⟨fun h => h.congr_nhds hst, fun h => h.congr_nhds hst.symm⟩
protected theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.mfderivWithin (h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x) :
mfderivWithin I I' f s x =
fderivWithin 𝕜 (writtenInExtChartAt I I' x f :) ((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I)
((extChartAt I x) x) := by
simp only [mfderivWithin, h, if_pos]
theorem MDifferentiableAt.hasMFDerivAt (h : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x) :
HasMFDerivAt I I' f x (mfderiv I I' f x) := by
refine ⟨h.continuousAt, ?_⟩
simp only [mfderiv, h, if_pos, mfld_simps]
exact DifferentiableWithinAt.hasFDerivWithinAt h.differentiableWithinAt_writtenInExtChartAt
protected theorem MDifferentiableAt.mfderiv (h : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x) :
mfderiv I I' f x =
fderivWithin 𝕜 (writtenInExtChartAt I I' x f :) (range I) ((extChartAt I x) x) := by
simp only [mfderiv, h, if_pos]
protected theorem HasMFDerivAt.mfderiv (h : HasMFDerivAt I I' f x f') : mfderiv I I' f x = f' :=
(hasMFDerivAt_unique h h.mdifferentiableAt.hasMFDerivAt).symm
protected theorem HasMFDerivWithinAt.mfderivWithin (h : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f')
(hxs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) : mfderivWithin I I' f s x = f' := by
ext
rw [hxs.eq h h.mdifferentiableWithinAt.hasMFDerivWithinAt]
theorem HasMFDerivWithinAt.mfderivWithin_eq_zero (h : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x 0) :
mfderivWithin I I' f s x = 0 := by
simp only [mfld_simps, mfderivWithin, h.mdifferentiableWithinAt, ↓reduceIte]
simp only [HasMFDerivWithinAt, mfld_simps] at h
rw [fderivWithin, if_pos]
exact h.2
theorem MDifferentiable.mfderivWithin (h : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x)
(hxs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) : mfderivWithin I I' f s x = mfderiv I I' f x := by
apply HasMFDerivWithinAt.mfderivWithin _ hxs
exact h.hasMFDerivAt.hasMFDerivWithinAt
theorem mfderivWithin_subset (st : s ⊆ t) (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x)
(h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f t x) :
mfderivWithin I I' f s x = mfderivWithin I I' f t x :=
((MDifferentiableWithinAt.hasMFDerivWithinAt h).mono st).mfderivWithin hs
theorem mfderivWithin_inter (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
mfderivWithin I I' f (s ∩ t) x = mfderivWithin I I' f s x := by
rw [mfderivWithin, mfderivWithin, extChartAt_preimage_inter_eq, mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter ht,
| fderivWithin_inter (extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhds ht)]
theorem mfderivWithin_of_mem_nhds (h : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : mfderivWithin I I' f s x = mfderiv I I' f x := by
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/MFDeriv/Basic.lean | 773 | 775 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Funext
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.ULift
import Mathlib.RingTheory.WittVector.Basic
/-!
# The `IsPoly` predicate
`WittVector.IsPoly` is a (type-valued) predicate on functions `f : Π R, 𝕎 R → 𝕎 R`.
It asserts that there is a family of polynomials `φ : ℕ → MvPolynomial ℕ ℤ`,
such that the `n`th coefficient of `f x` is equal to `φ n` evaluated on the coefficients of `x`.
Many operations on Witt vectors satisfy this predicate (or an analogue for higher arity functions).
We say that such a function `f` is a *polynomial function*.
The power of satisfying this predicate comes from `WittVector.IsPoly.ext`.
It shows that if `φ` and `ψ` witness that `f` and `g` are polynomial functions,
then `f = g` not merely when `φ = ψ`, but in fact it suffices to prove
```
∀ n, bind₁ φ (wittPolynomial p _ n) = bind₁ ψ (wittPolynomial p _ n)
```
(in other words, when evaluating the Witt polynomials on `φ` and `ψ`, we get the same values)
which will then imply `φ = ψ` and hence `f = g`.
Even though this sufficient condition looks somewhat intimidating,
it is rather pleasant to check in practice;
more so than direct checking of `φ = ψ`.
In practice, we apply this technique to show that the composition of `WittVector.frobenius`
and `WittVector.verschiebung` is equal to multiplication by `p`.
## Main declarations
* `WittVector.IsPoly`, `WittVector.IsPoly₂`:
two predicates that assert that a unary/binary function on Witt vectors
is polynomial in the coefficients of the input values.
* `WittVector.IsPoly.ext`, `WittVector.IsPoly₂.ext`:
two polynomial functions are equal if their families of polynomials are equal
after evaluating the Witt polynomials on them.
* `WittVector.IsPoly.comp` (+ many variants) show that unary/binary compositions
of polynomial functions are polynomial.
* `WittVector.idIsPoly`, `WittVector.negIsPoly`,
`WittVector.addIsPoly₂`, `WittVector.mulIsPoly₂`:
several well-known operations are polynomial functions
(for Verschiebung, Frobenius, and multiplication by `p`, see their respective files).
## On higher arity analogues
Ideally, there should be a predicate `IsPolyₙ` for functions of higher arity,
together with `IsPolyₙ.comp` that shows how such functions compose.
Since mathlib does not have a library on composition of higher arity functions,
we have only implemented the unary and binary variants so far.
Nullary functions (a.k.a. constants) are treated
as constant functions and fall under the unary case.
## Tactics
There are important metaprograms defined in this file:
the tactics `ghost_simp` and `ghost_calc` and the attribute `@[ghost_simps]`.
These are used in combination to discharge proofs of identities between polynomial functions.
The `ghost_calc` tactic makes use of the `IsPoly` and `IsPoly₂` typeclass and its instances.
(In Lean 3, there was an `@[is_poly]` attribute to manage these instances,
because typeclass resolution did not play well with function composition.
This no longer seems to be an issue, so that such instances can be defined directly.)
Any lemma doing "ring equation rewriting" with polynomial functions should be tagged
`@[ghost_simps]`, e.g.
```lean
@[ghost_simps]
lemma bind₁_frobenius_poly_wittPolynomial (n : ℕ) :
bind₁ (frobenius_poly p) (wittPolynomial p ℤ n) = (wittPolynomial p ℤ (n+1))
```
Proofs of identities between polynomial functions will often follow the pattern
```lean
ghost_calc _
<minor preprocessing>
ghost_simp
```
## References
* [Hazewinkel, *Witt Vectors*][Haze09]
* [Commelin and Lewis, *Formalizing the Ring of Witt Vectors*][CL21]
-/
namespace WittVector
universe u
variable {p : ℕ} {R S : Type u} {idx : Type*} [CommRing R] [CommRing S]
local notation "𝕎" => WittVector p -- type as `\bbW`
open MvPolynomial
open Function (uncurry)
variable (p)
noncomputable section
/-!
### The `IsPoly` predicate
-/
theorem poly_eq_of_wittPolynomial_bind_eq' [Fact p.Prime] (f g : ℕ → MvPolynomial (idx × ℕ) ℤ)
(h : ∀ n, bind₁ f (wittPolynomial p _ n) = bind₁ g (wittPolynomial p _ n)) : f = g := by
ext1 n
apply MvPolynomial.map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective
rw [← funext_iff] at h
replace h :=
congr_arg (fun fam => bind₁ (MvPolynomial.map (Int.castRingHom ℚ) ∘ fam) (xInTermsOfW p ℚ n)) h
simpa only [Function.comp_def, map_bind₁, map_wittPolynomial, ← bind₁_bind₁,
bind₁_wittPolynomial_xInTermsOfW, bind₁_X_right] using h
theorem poly_eq_of_wittPolynomial_bind_eq [Fact p.Prime] (f g : ℕ → MvPolynomial ℕ ℤ)
(h : ∀ n, bind₁ f (wittPolynomial p _ n) = bind₁ g (wittPolynomial p _ n)) : f = g := by
ext1 n
apply MvPolynomial.map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective
rw [← funext_iff] at h
replace h :=
congr_arg (fun fam => bind₁ (MvPolynomial.map (Int.castRingHom ℚ) ∘ fam) (xInTermsOfW p ℚ n)) h
simpa only [Function.comp_def, map_bind₁, map_wittPolynomial, ← bind₁_bind₁,
bind₁_wittPolynomial_xInTermsOfW, bind₁_X_right] using h
-- Ideally, we would generalise this to n-ary functions
-- But we don't have a good theory of n-ary compositions in mathlib
/--
A function `f : Π R, 𝕎 R → 𝕎 R` that maps Witt vectors to Witt vectors over arbitrary base rings
is said to be *polynomial* if there is a family of polynomials `φₙ` over `ℤ` such that the `n`th
coefficient of `f x` is given by evaluating `φₙ` at the coefficients of `x`.
See also `WittVector.IsPoly₂` for the binary variant.
The `ghost_calc` tactic makes use of the `IsPoly` and `IsPoly₂` typeclass and its instances.
(In Lean 3, there was an `@[is_poly]` attribute to manage these instances,
because typeclass resolution did not play well with function composition.
This no longer seems to be an issue, so that such instances can be defined directly.)
-/
class IsPoly (f : ∀ ⦃R⦄ [CommRing R], WittVector p R → 𝕎 R) : Prop where mk' ::
poly :
∃ φ : ℕ → MvPolynomial ℕ ℤ,
∀ ⦃R⦄ [CommRing R] (x : 𝕎 R), (f x).coeff = fun n => aeval x.coeff (φ n)
/-- The identity function on Witt vectors is a polynomial function. -/
instance idIsPoly : IsPoly p fun _ _ => id :=
⟨⟨X, by intros; simp only [aeval_X, id]⟩⟩
instance idIsPolyI' : IsPoly p fun _ _ a => a :=
WittVector.idIsPoly _
namespace IsPoly
instance : Inhabited (IsPoly p fun _ _ => id) :=
⟨WittVector.idIsPoly p⟩
variable {p}
theorem ext [Fact p.Prime] {f g} (hf : IsPoly p f) (hg : IsPoly p g)
(h : ∀ (R : Type u) [_Rcr : CommRing R] (x : 𝕎 R) (n : ℕ),
ghostComponent n (f x) = ghostComponent n (g x)) :
∀ (R : Type u) [_Rcr : CommRing R] (x : 𝕎 R), f x = g x := by
obtain ⟨φ, hf⟩ := hf
obtain ⟨ψ, hg⟩ := hg
intros
ext n
rw [hf, hg, poly_eq_of_wittPolynomial_bind_eq p φ ψ]
intro k
apply MvPolynomial.funext
intro x
simp only [hom_bind₁]
specialize h (ULift ℤ) (mk p fun i => ⟨x i⟩) k
simp only [ghostComponent_apply, aeval_eq_eval₂Hom] at h
apply (ULift.ringEquiv.symm : ℤ ≃+* _).injective
simp only [← RingEquiv.coe_toRingHom, map_eval₂Hom]
convert h using 1
all_goals
simp only [hf, hg, MvPolynomial.eval, map_eval₂Hom]
apply eval₂Hom_congr (RingHom.ext_int _ _) _ rfl
ext1
apply eval₂Hom_congr (RingHom.ext_int _ _) _ rfl
simp only [coeff_mk]; rfl
/-- The composition of polynomial functions is polynomial. -/
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10754): made this an instance
instance comp {g f} [hg : IsPoly p g] [hf : IsPoly p f] :
IsPoly p fun R _Rcr => @g R _Rcr ∘ @f R _Rcr := by
obtain ⟨φ, hf⟩ := hf
obtain ⟨ψ, hg⟩ := hg
use fun n => bind₁ φ (ψ n)
intros
simp only [aeval_bind₁, Function.comp, hg, hf]
end IsPoly
/-- A binary function `f : Π R, 𝕎 R → 𝕎 R → 𝕎 R` on Witt vectors
is said to be *polynomial* if there is a family of polynomials `φₙ` over `ℤ` such that the `n`th
coefficient of `f x y` is given by evaluating `φₙ` at the coefficients of `x` and `y`.
See also `WittVector.IsPoly` for the unary variant.
The `ghost_calc` tactic makes use of the `IsPoly` and `IsPoly₂` typeclass and its instances.
(In Lean 3, there was an `@[is_poly]` attribute to manage these instances,
because typeclass resolution did not play well with function composition.
This no longer seems to be an issue, so that such instances can be defined directly.)
-/
class IsPoly₂ (f : ∀ ⦃R⦄ [CommRing R], WittVector p R → 𝕎 R → 𝕎 R) : Prop where mk' ::
poly :
∃ φ : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin 2 × ℕ) ℤ,
∀ ⦃R⦄ [CommRing R] (x y : 𝕎 R), (f x y).coeff = fun n => peval (φ n) ![x.coeff, y.coeff]
variable {p}
/-- The composition of polynomial functions is polynomial. -/
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10754): made this an instance
instance IsPoly₂.comp {h f g} [hh : IsPoly₂ p h] [hf : IsPoly p f] [hg : IsPoly p g] :
IsPoly₂ p fun _ _Rcr x y => h (f x) (g y) := by
obtain ⟨φ, hf⟩ := hf
obtain ⟨ψ, hg⟩ := hg
obtain ⟨χ, hh⟩ := hh
refine ⟨⟨fun n ↦ bind₁ (uncurry <|
![fun k ↦ rename (Prod.mk (0 : Fin 2)) (φ k),
fun k ↦ rename (Prod.mk (1 : Fin 2)) (ψ k)]) (χ n), ?_⟩⟩
intros
funext n
simp +unfoldPartialApp only [peval, aeval_bind₁, Function.comp, hh, hf, hg,
uncurry]
apply eval₂Hom_congr rfl _ rfl
ext ⟨i, n⟩
fin_cases i <;> simp [aeval_eq_eval₂Hom, eval₂Hom_rename, Function.comp_def]
/-- The composition of a polynomial function with a binary polynomial function is polynomial. -/
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10754): made this an instance
instance IsPoly.comp₂ {g f} [hg : IsPoly p g] [hf : IsPoly₂ p f] :
IsPoly₂ p fun _ _Rcr x y => g (f x y) := by
obtain ⟨φ, hf⟩ := hf
obtain ⟨ψ, hg⟩ := hg
use fun n => bind₁ φ (ψ n)
intros
simp only [peval, aeval_bind₁, Function.comp, hg, hf]
/-- The diagonal `fun x ↦ f x x` of a polynomial function `f` is polynomial. -/
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10754): made this an instance
instance IsPoly₂.diag {f} [hf : IsPoly₂ p f] : IsPoly p fun _ _Rcr x => f x x := by
obtain ⟨φ, hf⟩ := hf
refine ⟨⟨fun n => bind₁ (uncurry ![X, X]) (φ n), ?_⟩⟩
intros; funext n
simp +unfoldPartialApp only [hf, peval, uncurry, aeval_bind₁]
apply eval₂Hom_congr rfl _ rfl
ext ⟨i, k⟩
fin_cases i <;> simp
-- Porting note: Lean 4's typeclass inference is sufficiently more powerful that we no longer
-- need the `@[is_poly]` attribute. Use of the attribute should just be replaced by changing the
-- theorem to an `instance`.
/-- The additive negation is a polynomial function on Witt vectors. -/
-- Porting note: replaced `@[is_poly]` with `instance`.
instance negIsPoly [Fact p.Prime] : IsPoly p fun R _ => @Neg.neg (𝕎 R) _ :=
⟨⟨fun n => rename Prod.snd (wittNeg p n), by
intros; funext n
rw [neg_coeff, aeval_eq_eval₂Hom, eval₂Hom_rename]
apply eval₂Hom_congr rfl _ rfl
ext ⟨i, k⟩; fin_cases i; rfl⟩⟩
section ZeroOne
/- To avoid a theory of 0-ary functions (a.k.a. constants)
we model them as constant unary functions. -/
/-- The function that is constantly zero on Witt vectors is a polynomial function. -/
instance zeroIsPoly [Fact p.Prime] : IsPoly p fun _ _ _ => 0 :=
⟨⟨0, by intros; funext n; simp only [Pi.zero_apply, map_zero, zero_coeff]⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem bind₁_zero_wittPolynomial [Fact p.Prime] (n : ℕ) :
bind₁ (0 : ℕ → MvPolynomial ℕ R) (wittPolynomial p R n) = 0 := by
rw [← aeval_eq_bind₁, aeval_zero, constantCoeff_wittPolynomial, RingHom.map_zero]
/-- The coefficients of `1 : 𝕎 R` as polynomials. -/
def onePoly (n : ℕ) : MvPolynomial ℕ ℤ :=
if n = 0 then 1 else 0
@[simp]
theorem bind₁_onePoly_wittPolynomial [hp : Fact p.Prime] (n : ℕ) :
bind₁ onePoly (wittPolynomial p ℤ n) = 1 := by
rw [wittPolynomial_eq_sum_C_mul_X_pow, map_sum, Finset.sum_eq_single 0]
· simp only [onePoly, one_pow, one_mul, map_pow, C_1, pow_zero, bind₁_X_right, if_true,
eq_self_iff_true]
· intro i _hi hi0
simp only [onePoly, if_neg hi0, zero_pow (pow_ne_zero _ hp.1.ne_zero), mul_zero, map_pow,
bind₁_X_right, map_mul]
· simp
/-- The function that is constantly one on Witt vectors is a polynomial function. -/
instance oneIsPoly [Fact p.Prime] : IsPoly p fun _ _ _ => 1 :=
⟨⟨onePoly, by
intros; funext n; cases n
· simp only [lt_self_iff_false, one_coeff_zero, onePoly, ite_true, map_one]
· simp only [Nat.succ_pos', one_coeff_eq_of_pos, onePoly, Nat.succ_ne_zero, ite_false,
map_zero]
⟩⟩
end ZeroOne
/-- Addition of Witt vectors is a polynomial function. -/
-- Porting note: replaced `@[is_poly]` with `instance`.
instance addIsPoly₂ [Fact p.Prime] : IsPoly₂ p fun _ _ => (· + ·) :=
⟨⟨wittAdd p, by intros; ext; exact add_coeff _ _ _⟩⟩
/-- Multiplication of Witt vectors is a polynomial function. -/
-- Porting note: replaced `@[is_poly]` with `instance`.
instance mulIsPoly₂ [Fact p.Prime] : IsPoly₂ p fun _ _ => (· * ·) :=
⟨⟨wittMul p, by intros; ext; exact mul_coeff _ _ _⟩⟩
-- unfortunately this is not universe polymorphic, merely because `f` isn't
theorem IsPoly.map [Fact p.Prime] {f} (hf : IsPoly p f) (g : R →+* S) (x : 𝕎 R) :
map g (f x) = f (map g x) := by
-- this could be turned into a tactic “macro” (taking `hf` as parameter)
-- so that applications do not have to worry about the universe issue
-- see `IsPoly₂.map` for a slightly more general proof strategy
obtain ⟨φ, hf⟩ := hf
ext n
simp_rw [map_coeff, hf, map_aeval, funext (map_coeff g _), RingHom.ext_int _ (algebraMap ℤ S),
aeval_eq_eval₂Hom]
namespace IsPoly₂
-- porting note: the argument `(fun _ _ => (· + ·))` to `IsPoly₂` was just `_`.
instance [Fact p.Prime] : Inhabited (IsPoly₂ p (fun _ _ => (· + ·))) :=
⟨addIsPoly₂⟩
theorem ext [Fact p.Prime] {f g} (hf : IsPoly₂ p f) (hg : IsPoly₂ p g)
(h : ∀ (R : Type u) [_Rcr : CommRing R] (x y : 𝕎 R) (n : ℕ),
ghostComponent n (f x y) = ghostComponent n (g x y)) :
∀ (R) [_Rcr : CommRing R] (x y : 𝕎 R), f x y = g x y := by
obtain ⟨φ, hf⟩ := hf
obtain ⟨ψ, hg⟩ := hg
intros
ext n
rw [hf, hg, poly_eq_of_wittPolynomial_bind_eq' p φ ψ]
intro k
apply MvPolynomial.funext
| intro x
simp only [hom_bind₁]
specialize h (ULift ℤ) (mk p fun i => ⟨x (0, i)⟩) (mk p fun i => ⟨x (1, i)⟩) k
simp only [ghostComponent_apply, aeval_eq_eval₂Hom] at h
apply (ULift.ringEquiv.symm : ℤ ≃+* _).injective
simp only [← RingEquiv.coe_toRingHom, map_eval₂Hom]
convert h using 1
all_goals
simp only [hf, hg, MvPolynomial.eval, map_eval₂Hom]
apply eval₂Hom_congr (RingHom.ext_int _ _) _ rfl
ext1
| Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/IsPoly.lean | 349 | 359 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.SmallSets
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousOn
/-!
# Basic results on uniform spaces
Uniform spaces are a generalization of metric spaces and topological groups.
## Main definitions
In this file we define a complete lattice structure on the type `UniformSpace X`
of uniform structures on `X`, as well as the pullback (`UniformSpace.comap`) of uniform structures
coming from the pullback of filters.
Like distance functions, uniform structures cannot be pushed forward in general.
## Notations
Localized in `Uniformity`, we have the notation `𝓤 X` for the uniformity on a uniform space `X`,
and `○` for composition of relations, seen as terms with type `Set (X × X)`.
## References
The formalization uses the books:
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
* [I. M. James, *Topologies and Uniformities*][james1999]
But it makes a more systematic use of the filter library.
-/
open Set Filter Topology
universe u v ua ub uc ud
/-!
### Relations, seen as `Set (α × α)`
-/
variable {α : Type ua} {β : Type ub} {γ : Type uc} {δ : Type ud} {ι : Sort*}
open Uniformity
section UniformSpace
variable [UniformSpace α]
/-- If `s ∈ 𝓤 α`, then for any natural `n`, for a subset `t` of a sufficiently small set in `𝓤 α`,
we have `t ○ t ○ ... ○ t ⊆ s` (`n` compositions). -/
theorem eventually_uniformity_iterate_comp_subset {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) (n : ℕ) :
∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, (t ○ ·)^[n] t ⊆ s := by
suffices ∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, t ⊆ s ∧ (t ○ ·)^[n] t ⊆ s from (eventually_and.1 this).2
induction n generalizing s with
| zero => simpa
| succ _ ihn =>
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs with ⟨t, htU, hts⟩
refine (ihn htU).mono fun U hU => ?_
rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply']
exact
⟨hU.1.trans <| (subset_comp_self <| refl_le_uniformity htU).trans hts,
(compRel_mono hU.1 hU.2).trans hts⟩
/-- If `s ∈ 𝓤 α`, then for a subset `t` of a sufficiently small set in `𝓤 α`,
we have `t ○ t ⊆ s`. -/
theorem eventually_uniformity_comp_subset {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, t ○ t ⊆ s :=
eventually_uniformity_iterate_comp_subset hs 1
/-!
### Balls in uniform spaces
-/
namespace UniformSpace
open UniformSpace (ball)
lemma isOpen_ball (x : α) {V : Set (α × α)} (hV : IsOpen V) : IsOpen (ball x V) :=
hV.preimage <| .prodMk_right _
lemma isClosed_ball (x : α) {V : Set (α × α)} (hV : IsClosed V) : IsClosed (ball x V) :=
hV.preimage <| .prodMk_right _
/-!
### Neighborhoods in uniform spaces
-/
theorem hasBasis_nhds_prod (x y : α) :
HasBasis (𝓝 (x, y)) (fun s => s ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsSymmetricRel s) fun s => ball x s ×ˢ ball y s := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
apply (hasBasis_nhds x).prod_same_index (hasBasis_nhds y)
rintro U V ⟨U_in, U_symm⟩ ⟨V_in, V_symm⟩
exact
⟨U ∩ V, ⟨(𝓤 α).inter_sets U_in V_in, U_symm.inter V_symm⟩, ball_inter_left x U V,
ball_inter_right y U V⟩
end UniformSpace
open UniformSpace
theorem nhds_eq_uniformity_prod {a b : α} :
𝓝 (a, b) =
(𝓤 α).lift' fun s : Set (α × α) => { y : α | (y, a) ∈ s } ×ˢ { y : α | (b, y) ∈ s } := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq, nhds_nhds_eq_uniformity_uniformity_prod, lift_lift'_same_eq_lift']
· exact fun s => monotone_const.set_prod monotone_preimage
· refine fun t => Monotone.set_prod ?_ monotone_const
exact monotone_preimage (f := fun y => (y, a))
theorem nhdset_of_mem_uniformity {d : Set (α × α)} (s : Set (α × α)) (hd : d ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t : Set (α × α), IsOpen t ∧ s ⊆ t ∧
t ⊆ { p | ∃ x y, (p.1, x) ∈ d ∧ (x, y) ∈ s ∧ (y, p.2) ∈ d } := by
let cl_d := { p : α × α | ∃ x y, (p.1, x) ∈ d ∧ (x, y) ∈ s ∧ (y, p.2) ∈ d }
have : ∀ p ∈ s, ∃ t, t ⊆ cl_d ∧ IsOpen t ∧ p ∈ t := fun ⟨x, y⟩ hp =>
mem_nhds_iff.mp <|
show cl_d ∈ 𝓝 (x, y) by
rw [nhds_eq_uniformity_prod, mem_lift'_sets]
· exact ⟨d, hd, fun ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => ⟨x, y, ha, hp, hb⟩⟩
· exact fun _ _ h _ h' => ⟨h h'.1, h h'.2⟩
choose t ht using this
exact ⟨(⋃ p : α × α, ⋃ h : p ∈ s, t p h : Set (α × α)),
isOpen_iUnion fun p : α × α => isOpen_iUnion fun hp => (ht p hp).right.left,
fun ⟨a, b⟩ hp => by
simp only [mem_iUnion, Prod.exists]; exact ⟨a, b, hp, (ht (a, b) hp).right.right⟩,
iUnion_subset fun p => iUnion_subset fun hp => (ht p hp).left⟩
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem nhds_le_uniformity (x : α) : 𝓝 (x, x) ≤ 𝓤 α := by
intro V V_in
rcases comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets V_in with ⟨w, w_in, w_symm, w_sub⟩
have : ball x w ×ˢ ball x w ∈ 𝓝 (x, x) := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
exact prod_mem_prod (ball_mem_nhds x w_in) (ball_mem_nhds x w_in)
apply mem_of_superset this
rintro ⟨u, v⟩ ⟨u_in, v_in⟩
exact w_sub (mem_comp_of_mem_ball w_symm u_in v_in)
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem iSup_nhds_le_uniformity : ⨆ x : α, 𝓝 (x, x) ≤ 𝓤 α :=
iSup_le nhds_le_uniformity
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem nhdsSet_diagonal_le_uniformity : 𝓝ˢ (diagonal α) ≤ 𝓤 α :=
(nhdsSet_diagonal α).trans_le iSup_nhds_le_uniformity
section
variable (α)
theorem UniformSpace.has_seq_basis [IsCountablyGenerated <| 𝓤 α] :
∃ V : ℕ → Set (α × α), HasAntitoneBasis (𝓤 α) V ∧ ∀ n, IsSymmetricRel (V n) :=
let ⟨U, hsym, hbasis⟩ := (@UniformSpace.hasBasis_symmetric α _).exists_antitone_subbasis
⟨U, hbasis, fun n => (hsym n).2⟩
end
/-!
### Closure and interior in uniform spaces
-/
theorem closure_eq_uniformity (s : Set <| α × α) :
closure s = ⋂ V ∈ { V | V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsSymmetricRel V }, V ○ s ○ V := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp +contextual only
[mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis (UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds_prod x y), mem_iInter, mem_setOf_eq,
and_imp, mem_comp_comp, exists_prop, ← mem_inter_iff, inter_comm, Set.Nonempty]
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_closed :
HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsClosed V) id := by
refine Filter.hasBasis_self.2 fun t h => ?_
rcases comp_comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets h with ⟨w, w_in, w_symm, r⟩
refine ⟨closure w, mem_of_superset w_in subset_closure, isClosed_closure, ?_⟩
refine Subset.trans ?_ r
rw [closure_eq_uniformity]
apply iInter_subset_of_subset
apply iInter_subset
exact ⟨w_in, w_symm⟩
theorem uniformity_eq_uniformity_closure : 𝓤 α = (𝓤 α).lift' closure :=
Eq.symm <| uniformity_hasBasis_closed.lift'_closure_eq_self fun _ => And.right
theorem Filter.HasBasis.uniformity_closure {p : ι → Prop} {U : ι → Set (α × α)}
(h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p U) : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun i => closure (U i) :=
(@uniformity_eq_uniformity_closure α _).symm ▸ h.lift'_closure
/-- Closed entourages form a basis of the uniformity filter. -/
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_closure : HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α) closure :=
(𝓤 α).basis_sets.uniformity_closure
theorem closure_eq_inter_uniformity {t : Set (α × α)} : closure t = ⋂ d ∈ 𝓤 α, d ○ (t ○ d) :=
calc
closure t = ⋂ (V) (_ : V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsSymmetricRel V), V ○ t ○ V := closure_eq_uniformity t
_ = ⋂ V ∈ 𝓤 α, V ○ t ○ V :=
Eq.symm <|
UniformSpace.hasBasis_symmetric.biInter_mem fun _ _ hV =>
compRel_mono (compRel_mono hV Subset.rfl) hV
_ = ⋂ V ∈ 𝓤 α, V ○ (t ○ V) := by simp only [compRel_assoc]
theorem uniformity_eq_uniformity_interior : 𝓤 α = (𝓤 α).lift' interior :=
le_antisymm
(le_iInf₂ fun d hd => by
let ⟨s, hs, hs_comp⟩ := comp3_mem_uniformity hd
let ⟨t, ht, hst, ht_comp⟩ := nhdset_of_mem_uniformity s hs
have : s ⊆ interior d :=
calc
s ⊆ t := hst
_ ⊆ interior d :=
ht.subset_interior_iff.mpr fun x (hx : x ∈ t) =>
let ⟨x, y, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := ht_comp hx
hs_comp ⟨x, h₁, y, h₂, h₃⟩
have : interior d ∈ 𝓤 α := by filter_upwards [hs] using this
simp [this])
fun _ hs => ((𝓤 α).lift' interior).sets_of_superset (mem_lift' hs) interior_subset
theorem interior_mem_uniformity {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : interior s ∈ 𝓤 α := by
rw [uniformity_eq_uniformity_interior]; exact mem_lift' hs
theorem mem_uniformity_isClosed {s : Set (α × α)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : ∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, IsClosed t ∧ t ⊆ s :=
let ⟨t, ⟨ht_mem, htc⟩, hts⟩ := uniformity_hasBasis_closed.mem_iff.1 h
⟨t, ht_mem, htc, hts⟩
theorem isOpen_iff_isOpen_ball_subset {s : Set α} :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ V ∈ 𝓤 α, IsOpen V ∧ ball x V ⊆ s := by
rw [isOpen_iff_ball_subset]
constructor <;> intro h x hx
· obtain ⟨V, hV, hV'⟩ := h x hx
exact
⟨interior V, interior_mem_uniformity hV, isOpen_interior,
(ball_mono interior_subset x).trans hV'⟩
· obtain ⟨V, hV, -, hV'⟩ := h x hx
exact ⟨V, hV, hV'⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-18")] alias
isOpen_iff_open_ball_subset := isOpen_iff_isOpen_ball_subset
/-- The uniform neighborhoods of all points of a dense set cover the whole space. -/
theorem Dense.biUnion_uniformity_ball {s : Set α} {U : Set (α × α)} (hs : Dense s) (hU : U ∈ 𝓤 α) :
⋃ x ∈ s, ball x U = univ := by
refine iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => ?_
rcases hs.inter_nhds_nonempty (mem_nhds_right y hU) with ⟨x, hxs, hxy : (x, y) ∈ U⟩
exact ⟨x, hxs, hxy⟩
/-- The uniform neighborhoods of all points of a dense indexed collection cover the whole space. -/
lemma DenseRange.iUnion_uniformity_ball {ι : Type*} {xs : ι → α}
(xs_dense : DenseRange xs) {U : Set (α × α)} (hU : U ∈ uniformity α) :
⋃ i, UniformSpace.ball (xs i) U = univ := by
rw [← biUnion_range (f := xs) (g := fun x ↦ UniformSpace.ball x U)]
exact Dense.biUnion_uniformity_ball xs_dense hU
/-!
### Uniformity bases
-/
/-- Open elements of `𝓤 α` form a basis of `𝓤 α`. -/
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_open : HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsOpen V) id :=
hasBasis_self.2 fun s hs =>
⟨interior s, interior_mem_uniformity hs, isOpen_interior, interior_subset⟩
theorem Filter.HasBasis.mem_uniformity_iff {p : β → Prop} {s : β → Set (α × α)}
(h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) {t : Set (α × α)} :
t ∈ 𝓤 α ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ ∀ a b, (a, b) ∈ s i → (a, b) ∈ t :=
h.mem_iff.trans <| by simp only [Prod.forall, subset_def]
/-- Open elements `s : Set (α × α)` of `𝓤 α` such that `(x, y) ∈ s ↔ (y, x) ∈ s` form a basis
of `𝓤 α`. -/
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_open_symmetric :
HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsOpen V ∧ IsSymmetricRel V) id := by
simp only [← and_assoc]
refine uniformity_hasBasis_open.restrict fun s hs => ⟨symmetrizeRel s, ?_⟩
exact
⟨⟨symmetrize_mem_uniformity hs.1, IsOpen.inter hs.2 (hs.2.preimage continuous_swap)⟩,
symmetric_symmetrizeRel s, symmetrizeRel_subset_self s⟩
theorem comp_open_symm_mem_uniformity_sets {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, IsOpen t ∧ IsSymmetricRel t ∧ t ○ t ⊆ s := by
obtain ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs
obtain ⟨u, ⟨hu₁, hu₂, hu₃⟩, hu₄ : u ⊆ t⟩ := uniformity_hasBasis_open_symmetric.mem_iff.mp ht₁
exact ⟨u, hu₁, hu₂, hu₃, (compRel_mono hu₄ hu₄).trans ht₂⟩
end UniformSpace
open uniformity
section Constructions
instance : PartialOrder (UniformSpace α) :=
PartialOrder.lift (fun u => 𝓤[u]) fun _ _ => UniformSpace.ext
protected theorem UniformSpace.le_def {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} : u₁ ≤ u₂ ↔ 𝓤[u₁] ≤ 𝓤[u₂] := Iff.rfl
instance : InfSet (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨fun s =>
UniformSpace.ofCore
{ uniformity := ⨅ u ∈ s, 𝓤[u]
refl := le_iInf fun u => le_iInf fun _ => u.toCore.refl
symm := le_iInf₂ fun u hu =>
le_trans (map_mono <| iInf_le_of_le _ <| iInf_le _ hu) u.symm
comp := le_iInf₂ fun u hu =>
le_trans (lift'_mono (iInf_le_of_le _ <| iInf_le _ hu) <| le_rfl) u.comp }⟩
protected theorem UniformSpace.sInf_le {tt : Set (UniformSpace α)} {t : UniformSpace α}
(h : t ∈ tt) : sInf tt ≤ t :=
show ⨅ u ∈ tt, 𝓤[u] ≤ 𝓤[t] from iInf₂_le t h
protected theorem UniformSpace.le_sInf {tt : Set (UniformSpace α)} {t : UniformSpace α}
(h : ∀ t' ∈ tt, t ≤ t') : t ≤ sInf tt :=
show 𝓤[t] ≤ ⨅ u ∈ tt, 𝓤[u] from le_iInf₂ h
instance : Top (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨@UniformSpace.mk α ⊤ ⊤ le_top le_top fun x ↦ by simp only [nhds_top, comap_top]⟩
instance : Bot (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨{ toTopologicalSpace := ⊥
uniformity := 𝓟 idRel
symm := by simp [Tendsto]
comp := lift'_le (mem_principal_self _) <| principal_mono.2 id_compRel.subset
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity := fun s => by
let _ : TopologicalSpace α := ⊥; have := discreteTopology_bot α
simp [idRel] }⟩
instance : Min (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨fun u₁ u₂ =>
{ uniformity := 𝓤[u₁] ⊓ 𝓤[u₂]
symm := u₁.symm.inf u₂.symm
comp := (lift'_inf_le _ _ _).trans <| inf_le_inf u₁.comp u₂.comp
toTopologicalSpace := u₁.toTopologicalSpace ⊓ u₂.toTopologicalSpace
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity := fun _ ↦ by
rw [@nhds_inf _ u₁.toTopologicalSpace _, @nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ u₁,
@nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ u₂, comap_inf] }⟩
instance : CompleteLattice (UniformSpace α) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (PartialOrder (UniformSpace α)) with
sup := fun a b => sInf { x | a ≤ x ∧ b ≤ x }
le_sup_left := fun _ _ => UniformSpace.le_sInf fun _ ⟨h, _⟩ => h
le_sup_right := fun _ _ => UniformSpace.le_sInf fun _ ⟨_, h⟩ => h
sup_le := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => UniformSpace.sInf_le ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
le_inf := fun a _ _ h₁ h₂ => show a.uniformity ≤ _ from le_inf h₁ h₂
inf_le_left := fun a _ => show _ ≤ a.uniformity from inf_le_left
inf_le_right := fun _ b => show _ ≤ b.uniformity from inf_le_right
top := ⊤
le_top := fun a => show a.uniformity ≤ ⊤ from le_top
bot := ⊥
bot_le := fun u => u.toCore.refl
sSup := fun tt => sInf { t | ∀ t' ∈ tt, t' ≤ t }
le_sSup := fun _ _ h => UniformSpace.le_sInf fun _ h' => h' _ h
sSup_le := fun _ _ h => UniformSpace.sInf_le h
sInf := sInf
le_sInf := fun _ _ hs => UniformSpace.le_sInf hs
sInf_le := fun _ _ ha => UniformSpace.sInf_le ha }
theorem iInf_uniformity {ι : Sort*} {u : ι → UniformSpace α} : 𝓤[iInf u] = ⨅ i, 𝓤[u i] :=
iInf_range
theorem inf_uniformity {u v : UniformSpace α} : 𝓤[u ⊓ v] = 𝓤[u] ⊓ 𝓤[v] := rfl
lemma bot_uniformity : 𝓤[(⊥ : UniformSpace α)] = 𝓟 idRel := rfl
lemma top_uniformity : 𝓤[(⊤ : UniformSpace α)] = ⊤ := rfl
instance inhabitedUniformSpace : Inhabited (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨⊥⟩
instance inhabitedUniformSpaceCore : Inhabited (UniformSpace.Core α) :=
⟨@UniformSpace.toCore _ default⟩
instance [Subsingleton α] : Unique (UniformSpace α) where
uniq u := bot_unique <| le_principal_iff.2 <| by
rw [idRel, ← diagonal, diagonal_eq_univ]; exact univ_mem
/-- Given `f : α → β` and a uniformity `u` on `β`, the inverse image of `u` under `f`
is the inverse image in the filter sense of the induced function `α × α → β × β`.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev UniformSpace.comap (f : α → β) (u : UniformSpace β) : UniformSpace α where
uniformity := 𝓤[u].comap fun p : α × α => (f p.1, f p.2)
symm := by
simp only [tendsto_comap_iff, Prod.swap, (· ∘ ·)]
exact tendsto_swap_uniformity.comp tendsto_comap
comp := le_trans
(by
rw [comap_lift'_eq, comap_lift'_eq2]
· exact lift'_mono' fun s _ ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨x, h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨f x, h₁, h₂⟩
· exact monotone_id.compRel monotone_id)
(comap_mono u.comp)
toTopologicalSpace := u.toTopologicalSpace.induced f
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity x := by
simp only [nhds_induced, nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, comap_comap, Function.comp_def]
theorem uniformity_comap {_ : UniformSpace β} (f : α → β) :
𝓤[UniformSpace.comap f ‹_›] = comap (Prod.map f f) (𝓤 β) :=
rfl
lemma ball_preimage {f : α → β} {U : Set (β × β)} {x : α} :
UniformSpace.ball x (Prod.map f f ⁻¹' U) = f ⁻¹' UniformSpace.ball (f x) U := by
ext : 1
simp only [UniformSpace.ball, mem_preimage, Prod.map_apply]
@[simp]
theorem uniformSpace_comap_id {α : Type*} : UniformSpace.comap (id : α → α) = id := by
ext : 2
rw [uniformity_comap, Prod.map_id, comap_id]
theorem UniformSpace.comap_comap {α β γ} {uγ : UniformSpace γ} {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} :
UniformSpace.comap (g ∘ f) uγ = UniformSpace.comap f (UniformSpace.comap g uγ) := by
ext1
simp only [uniformity_comap, Filter.comap_comap, Prod.map_comp_map]
theorem UniformSpace.comap_inf {α γ} {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace γ} {f : α → γ} :
(u₁ ⊓ u₂).comap f = u₁.comap f ⊓ u₂.comap f :=
UniformSpace.ext Filter.comap_inf
theorem UniformSpace.comap_iInf {ι α γ} {u : ι → UniformSpace γ} {f : α → γ} :
(⨅ i, u i).comap f = ⨅ i, (u i).comap f := by
ext : 1
simp [uniformity_comap, iInf_uniformity]
theorem UniformSpace.comap_mono {α γ} {f : α → γ} :
Monotone fun u : UniformSpace γ => u.comap f := fun _ _ hu =>
Filter.comap_mono hu
theorem uniformContinuous_iff {α β} {uα : UniformSpace α} {uβ : UniformSpace β} {f : α → β} :
UniformContinuous f ↔ uα ≤ uβ.comap f :=
Filter.map_le_iff_le_comap
theorem le_iff_uniformContinuous_id {u v : UniformSpace α} :
u ≤ v ↔ @UniformContinuous _ _ u v id := by
rw [uniformContinuous_iff, uniformSpace_comap_id, id]
theorem uniformContinuous_comap {f : α → β} [u : UniformSpace β] :
@UniformContinuous α β (UniformSpace.comap f u) u f :=
tendsto_comap
theorem uniformContinuous_comap' {f : γ → β} {g : α → γ} [v : UniformSpace β] [u : UniformSpace α]
(h : UniformContinuous (f ∘ g)) : @UniformContinuous α γ u (UniformSpace.comap f v) g :=
tendsto_comap_iff.2 h
namespace UniformSpace
theorem to_nhds_mono {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} (h : u₁ ≤ u₂) (a : α) :
@nhds _ (@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₁) a ≤
@nhds _ (@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₂) a := by
rw [@nhds_eq_uniformity α u₁ a, @nhds_eq_uniformity α u₂ a]; exact lift'_mono h le_rfl
theorem toTopologicalSpace_mono {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} (h : u₁ ≤ u₂) :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₁ ≤ @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₂ :=
le_of_nhds_le_nhds <| to_nhds_mono h
theorem toTopologicalSpace_comap {f : α → β} {u : UniformSpace β} :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ (UniformSpace.comap f u) =
TopologicalSpace.induced f (@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace β u) :=
rfl
lemma uniformSpace_eq_bot {u : UniformSpace α} : u = ⊥ ↔ idRel ∈ 𝓤[u] :=
le_bot_iff.symm.trans le_principal_iff
protected lemma _root_.Filter.HasBasis.uniformSpace_eq_bot {ι p} {s : ι → Set (α × α)}
{u : UniformSpace α} (h : 𝓤[u].HasBasis p s) :
u = ⊥ ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ Pairwise fun x y : α ↦ (x, y) ∉ s i := by
simp [uniformSpace_eq_bot, h.mem_iff, subset_def, Pairwise, not_imp_not]
theorem toTopologicalSpace_bot : @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace α ⊥ = ⊥ := rfl
theorem toTopologicalSpace_top : @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace α ⊤ = ⊤ := rfl
theorem toTopologicalSpace_iInf {ι : Sort*} {u : ι → UniformSpace α} :
(iInf u).toTopologicalSpace = ⨅ i, (u i).toTopologicalSpace :=
TopologicalSpace.ext_nhds fun a ↦ by simp only [@nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ (iInf u), nhds_iInf,
iInf_uniformity, @nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ (u _), Filter.comap_iInf]
theorem toTopologicalSpace_sInf {s : Set (UniformSpace α)} :
(sInf s).toTopologicalSpace = ⨅ i ∈ s, @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace α i := by
rw [sInf_eq_iInf]
simp only [← toTopologicalSpace_iInf]
theorem toTopologicalSpace_inf {u v : UniformSpace α} :
(u ⊓ v).toTopologicalSpace = u.toTopologicalSpace ⊓ v.toTopologicalSpace :=
rfl
end UniformSpace
theorem UniformContinuous.continuous [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) : Continuous f :=
continuous_iff_le_induced.mpr <| UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace_mono <|
uniformContinuous_iff.1 hf
/-- Uniform space structure on `ULift α`. -/
instance ULift.uniformSpace [UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace (ULift α) :=
UniformSpace.comap ULift.down ‹_›
/-- Uniform space structure on `αᵒᵈ`. -/
instance OrderDual.instUniformSpace [UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace (αᵒᵈ) :=
‹UniformSpace α›
section UniformContinuousInfi
-- TODO: add an `iff` lemma?
theorem UniformContinuous.inf_rng {f : α → β} {u₁ : UniformSpace α} {u₂ u₃ : UniformSpace β}
(h₁ : UniformContinuous[u₁, u₂] f) (h₂ : UniformContinuous[u₁, u₃] f) :
UniformContinuous[u₁, u₂ ⊓ u₃] f :=
tendsto_inf.mpr ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
theorem UniformContinuous.inf_dom_left {f : α → β} {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} {u₃ : UniformSpace β}
(hf : UniformContinuous[u₁, u₃] f) : UniformContinuous[u₁ ⊓ u₂, u₃] f :=
tendsto_inf_left hf
theorem UniformContinuous.inf_dom_right {f : α → β} {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} {u₃ : UniformSpace β}
(hf : UniformContinuous[u₂, u₃] f) : UniformContinuous[u₁ ⊓ u₂, u₃] f :=
tendsto_inf_right hf
theorem uniformContinuous_sInf_dom {f : α → β} {u₁ : Set (UniformSpace α)} {u₂ : UniformSpace β}
{u : UniformSpace α} (h₁ : u ∈ u₁) (hf : UniformContinuous[u, u₂] f) :
UniformContinuous[sInf u₁, u₂] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [sInf_eq_iInf', iInf_uniformity]
exact tendsto_iInf' ⟨u, h₁⟩ hf
theorem uniformContinuous_sInf_rng {f : α → β} {u₁ : UniformSpace α} {u₂ : Set (UniformSpace β)} :
UniformContinuous[u₁, sInf u₂] f ↔ ∀ u ∈ u₂, UniformContinuous[u₁, u] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [sInf_eq_iInf', iInf_uniformity, tendsto_iInf, SetCoe.forall]
theorem uniformContinuous_iInf_dom {f : α → β} {u₁ : ι → UniformSpace α} {u₂ : UniformSpace β}
{i : ι} (hf : UniformContinuous[u₁ i, u₂] f) : UniformContinuous[iInf u₁, u₂] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [iInf_uniformity]
exact tendsto_iInf' i hf
theorem uniformContinuous_iInf_rng {f : α → β} {u₁ : UniformSpace α} {u₂ : ι → UniformSpace β} :
UniformContinuous[u₁, iInf u₂] f ↔ ∀ i, UniformContinuous[u₁, u₂ i] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [iInf_uniformity, tendsto_iInf]
end UniformContinuousInfi
/-- A uniform space with the discrete uniformity has the discrete topology. -/
theorem discreteTopology_of_discrete_uniformity [hα : UniformSpace α] (h : uniformity α = 𝓟 idRel) :
DiscreteTopology α :=
⟨(UniformSpace.ext h.symm : ⊥ = hα) ▸ rfl⟩
instance : UniformSpace Empty := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace PUnit := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace Bool := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace ℕ := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace ℤ := ⊥
section
variable [UniformSpace α]
open Additive Multiplicative
instance : UniformSpace (Additive α) := ‹UniformSpace α›
instance : UniformSpace (Multiplicative α) := ‹UniformSpace α›
theorem uniformContinuous_ofMul : UniformContinuous (ofMul : α → Additive α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformContinuous_toMul : UniformContinuous (toMul : Additive α → α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformContinuous_ofAdd : UniformContinuous (ofAdd : α → Multiplicative α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformContinuous_toAdd : UniformContinuous (toAdd : Multiplicative α → α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformity_additive : 𝓤 (Additive α) = (𝓤 α).map (Prod.map ofMul ofMul) := rfl
theorem uniformity_multiplicative : 𝓤 (Multiplicative α) = (𝓤 α).map (Prod.map ofAdd ofAdd) := rfl
end
instance instUniformSpaceSubtype {p : α → Prop} [t : UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace (Subtype p) :=
UniformSpace.comap Subtype.val t
theorem uniformity_subtype {p : α → Prop} [UniformSpace α] :
𝓤 (Subtype p) = comap (fun q : Subtype p × Subtype p => (q.1.1, q.2.1)) (𝓤 α) :=
rfl
theorem uniformity_setCoe {s : Set α} [UniformSpace α] :
𝓤 s = comap (Prod.map ((↑) : s → α) ((↑) : s → α)) (𝓤 α) :=
rfl
theorem map_uniformity_set_coe {s : Set α} [UniformSpace α] :
map (Prod.map (↑) (↑)) (𝓤 s) = 𝓤 α ⊓ 𝓟 (s ×ˢ s) := by
rw [uniformity_setCoe, map_comap, range_prodMap, Subtype.range_val]
theorem uniformContinuous_subtype_val {p : α → Prop} [UniformSpace α] :
UniformContinuous (Subtype.val : { a : α // p a } → α) :=
uniformContinuous_comap
theorem UniformContinuous.subtype_mk {p : α → Prop} [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : β → α}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) (h : ∀ x, p (f x)) :
UniformContinuous (fun x => ⟨f x, h x⟩ : β → Subtype p) :=
uniformContinuous_comap' hf
theorem uniformContinuousOn_iff_restrict [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
UniformContinuousOn f s ↔ UniformContinuous (s.restrict f) := by
delta UniformContinuousOn UniformContinuous
rw [← map_uniformity_set_coe, tendsto_map'_iff]; rfl
theorem tendsto_of_uniformContinuous_subtype [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β}
{s : Set α} {a : α} (hf : UniformContinuous fun x : s => f x.val) (ha : s ∈ 𝓝 a) :
Tendsto f (𝓝 a) (𝓝 (f a)) := by
rw [(@map_nhds_subtype_coe_eq_nhds α _ s a (mem_of_mem_nhds ha) ha).symm]
exact tendsto_map' hf.continuous.continuousAt
theorem UniformContinuousOn.continuousOn [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α}
(h : UniformContinuousOn f s) : ContinuousOn f s := by
rw [uniformContinuousOn_iff_restrict] at h
rw [continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict]
exact h.continuous
@[to_additive]
instance [UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace αᵐᵒᵖ :=
UniformSpace.comap MulOpposite.unop ‹_›
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformity_mulOpposite [UniformSpace α] :
𝓤 αᵐᵒᵖ = comap (fun q : αᵐᵒᵖ × αᵐᵒᵖ => (q.1.unop, q.2.unop)) (𝓤 α) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem comap_uniformity_mulOpposite [UniformSpace α] :
comap (fun p : α × α => (MulOpposite.op p.1, MulOpposite.op p.2)) (𝓤 αᵐᵒᵖ) = 𝓤 α := by
simpa [uniformity_mulOpposite, comap_comap, (· ∘ ·)] using comap_id
namespace MulOpposite
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformContinuous_unop [UniformSpace α] : UniformContinuous (unop : αᵐᵒᵖ → α) :=
uniformContinuous_comap
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformContinuous_op [UniformSpace α] : UniformContinuous (op : α → αᵐᵒᵖ) :=
uniformContinuous_comap' uniformContinuous_id
end MulOpposite
section Prod
open UniformSpace
/- a similar product space is possible on the function space (uniformity of pointwise convergence),
but we want to have the uniformity of uniform convergence on function spaces -/
instance instUniformSpaceProd [u₁ : UniformSpace α] [u₂ : UniformSpace β] : UniformSpace (α × β) :=
u₁.comap Prod.fst ⊓ u₂.comap Prod.snd
-- check the above produces no diamond for `simp` and typeclass search
example [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
(instTopologicalSpaceProd : TopologicalSpace (α × β)) = UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace := by
with_reducible_and_instances rfl
theorem uniformity_prod [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
𝓤 (α × β) =
((𝓤 α).comap fun p : (α × β) × α × β => (p.1.1, p.2.1)) ⊓
(𝓤 β).comap fun p : (α × β) × α × β => (p.1.2, p.2.2) :=
rfl
instance [UniformSpace α] [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 α)]
[UniformSpace β] [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 β)] : IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 (α × β)) := by
rw [uniformity_prod]
infer_instance
theorem uniformity_prod_eq_comap_prod [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
𝓤 (α × β) =
comap (fun p : (α × β) × α × β => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) (𝓤 α ×ˢ 𝓤 β) := by
simp_rw [uniformity_prod, prod_eq_inf, Filter.comap_inf, Filter.comap_comap, Function.comp_def]
theorem uniformity_prod_eq_prod [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
𝓤 (α × β) = map (fun p : (α × α) × β × β => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) (𝓤 α ×ˢ 𝓤 β) := by
rw [map_swap4_eq_comap, uniformity_prod_eq_comap_prod]
theorem mem_uniformity_of_uniformContinuous_invariant [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
{s : Set (β × β)} {f : α → α → β} (hf : UniformContinuous fun p : α × α => f p.1 p.2)
(hs : s ∈ 𝓤 β) : ∃ u ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ a b c, (a, b) ∈ u → (f a c, f b c) ∈ s := by
rw [UniformContinuous, uniformity_prod_eq_prod, tendsto_map'_iff] at hf
rcases mem_prod_iff.1 (mem_map.1 <| hf hs) with ⟨u, hu, v, hv, huvt⟩
exact ⟨u, hu, fun a b c hab => @huvt ((_, _), (_, _)) ⟨hab, refl_mem_uniformity hv⟩⟩
/-- An entourage of the diagonal in `α` and an entourage in `β` yield an entourage in `α × β`
once we permute coordinates. -/
def entourageProd (u : Set (α × α)) (v : Set (β × β)) : Set ((α × β) × α × β) :=
{((a₁, b₁),(a₂, b₂)) | (a₁, a₂) ∈ u ∧ (b₁, b₂) ∈ v}
theorem mem_entourageProd {u : Set (α × α)} {v : Set (β × β)} {p : (α × β) × α × β} :
p ∈ entourageProd u v ↔ (p.1.1, p.2.1) ∈ u ∧ (p.1.2, p.2.2) ∈ v := Iff.rfl
theorem entourageProd_mem_uniformity [t₁ : UniformSpace α] [t₂ : UniformSpace β] {u : Set (α × α)}
{v : Set (β × β)} (hu : u ∈ 𝓤 α) (hv : v ∈ 𝓤 β) :
entourageProd u v ∈ 𝓤 (α × β) := by
rw [uniformity_prod]; exact inter_mem_inf (preimage_mem_comap hu) (preimage_mem_comap hv)
theorem ball_entourageProd (u : Set (α × α)) (v : Set (β × β)) (x : α × β) :
ball x (entourageProd u v) = ball x.1 u ×ˢ ball x.2 v := by
ext p; simp only [ball, entourageProd, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_prod, Set.mem_preimage]
lemma IsSymmetricRel.entourageProd {u : Set (α × α)} {v : Set (β × β)}
(hu : IsSymmetricRel u) (hv : IsSymmetricRel v) :
IsSymmetricRel (entourageProd u v) :=
Set.ext fun _ ↦ and_congr hu.mk_mem_comm hv.mk_mem_comm
theorem Filter.HasBasis.uniformity_prod {ιa ιb : Type*} [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
{pa : ιa → Prop} {pb : ιb → Prop} {sa : ιa → Set (α × α)} {sb : ιb → Set (β × β)}
(ha : (𝓤 α).HasBasis pa sa) (hb : (𝓤 β).HasBasis pb sb) :
(𝓤 (α × β)).HasBasis (fun i : ιa × ιb ↦ pa i.1 ∧ pb i.2)
(fun i ↦ entourageProd (sa i.1) (sb i.2)) :=
(ha.comap _).inf (hb.comap _)
theorem entourageProd_subset [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
{s : Set ((α × β) × α × β)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 (α × β)) :
∃ u ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ v ∈ 𝓤 β, entourageProd u v ⊆ s := by
rcases (((𝓤 α).basis_sets.uniformity_prod (𝓤 β).basis_sets).mem_iff' s).1 h with ⟨w, hw⟩
use w.1, hw.1.1, w.2, hw.1.2, hw.2
theorem tendsto_prod_uniformity_fst [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
Tendsto (fun p : (α × β) × α × β => (p.1.1, p.2.1)) (𝓤 (α × β)) (𝓤 α) :=
le_trans (map_mono inf_le_left) map_comap_le
theorem tendsto_prod_uniformity_snd [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
Tendsto (fun p : (α × β) × α × β => (p.1.2, p.2.2)) (𝓤 (α × β)) (𝓤 β) :=
le_trans (map_mono inf_le_right) map_comap_le
theorem uniformContinuous_fst [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => p.1 :=
tendsto_prod_uniformity_fst
theorem uniformContinuous_snd [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => p.2 :=
tendsto_prod_uniformity_snd
variable [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] [UniformSpace γ]
theorem UniformContinuous.prodMk {f₁ : α → β} {f₂ : α → γ} (h₁ : UniformContinuous f₁)
(h₂ : UniformContinuous f₂) : UniformContinuous fun a => (f₁ a, f₂ a) := by
rw [UniformContinuous, uniformity_prod]
exact tendsto_inf.2 ⟨tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₁, tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₂⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias UniformContinuous.prod_mk := UniformContinuous.prodMk
theorem UniformContinuous.prodMk_left {f : α × β → γ} (h : UniformContinuous f) (b) :
UniformContinuous fun a => f (a, b) :=
h.comp (uniformContinuous_id.prodMk uniformContinuous_const)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias UniformContinuous.prod_mk_left := UniformContinuous.prodMk_left
theorem UniformContinuous.prodMk_right {f : α × β → γ} (h : UniformContinuous f) (a) :
UniformContinuous fun b => f (a, b) :=
h.comp (uniformContinuous_const.prodMk uniformContinuous_id)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias UniformContinuous.prod_mk_right := UniformContinuous.prodMk_right
theorem UniformContinuous.prodMap [UniformSpace δ] {f : α → γ} {g : β → δ}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) (hg : UniformContinuous g) : UniformContinuous (Prod.map f g) :=
(hf.comp uniformContinuous_fst).prodMk (hg.comp uniformContinuous_snd)
theorem toTopologicalSpace_prod {α} {β} [u : UniformSpace α] [v : UniformSpace β] :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace (α × β) instUniformSpaceProd =
@instTopologicalSpaceProd α β u.toTopologicalSpace v.toTopologicalSpace :=
rfl
/-- A version of `UniformContinuous.inf_dom_left` for binary functions -/
theorem uniformContinuous_inf_dom_left₂ {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {ua1 ua2 : UniformSpace α}
{ub1 ub2 : UniformSpace β} {uc1 : UniformSpace γ}
(h : by haveI := ua1; haveI := ub1; exact UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := ua1 ⊓ ua2; haveI := ub1 ⊓ ub2
exact UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2 := by
-- proof essentially copied from `continuous_inf_dom_left₂`
have ha := @UniformContinuous.inf_dom_left _ _ id ua1 ua2 ua1 (@uniformContinuous_id _ (id _))
have hb := @UniformContinuous.inf_dom_left _ _ id ub1 ub2 ub1 (@uniformContinuous_id _ (id _))
have h_unif_cont_id :=
@UniformContinuous.prodMap _ _ _ _ (ua1 ⊓ ua2) (ub1 ⊓ ub2) ua1 ub1 _ _ ha hb
exact @UniformContinuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ h h_unif_cont_id
/-- A version of `UniformContinuous.inf_dom_right` for binary functions -/
theorem uniformContinuous_inf_dom_right₂ {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {ua1 ua2 : UniformSpace α}
{ub1 ub2 : UniformSpace β} {uc1 : UniformSpace γ}
(h : by haveI := ua2; haveI := ub2; exact UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := ua1 ⊓ ua2; haveI := ub1 ⊓ ub2
exact UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2 := by
-- proof essentially copied from `continuous_inf_dom_right₂`
have ha := @UniformContinuous.inf_dom_right _ _ id ua1 ua2 ua2 (@uniformContinuous_id _ (id _))
have hb := @UniformContinuous.inf_dom_right _ _ id ub1 ub2 ub2 (@uniformContinuous_id _ (id _))
have h_unif_cont_id :=
@UniformContinuous.prodMap _ _ _ _ (ua1 ⊓ ua2) (ub1 ⊓ ub2) ua2 ub2 _ _ ha hb
exact @UniformContinuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ h h_unif_cont_id
/-- A version of `uniformContinuous_sInf_dom` for binary functions -/
theorem uniformContinuous_sInf_dom₂ {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {uas : Set (UniformSpace α)}
{ubs : Set (UniformSpace β)} {ua : UniformSpace α} {ub : UniformSpace β} {uc : UniformSpace γ}
(ha : ua ∈ uas) (hb : ub ∈ ubs) (hf : UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := sInf uas; haveI := sInf ubs
exact @UniformContinuous _ _ _ uc fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2 := by
-- proof essentially copied from `continuous_sInf_dom`
let _ : UniformSpace (α × β) := instUniformSpaceProd
have ha := uniformContinuous_sInf_dom ha uniformContinuous_id
have hb := uniformContinuous_sInf_dom hb uniformContinuous_id
have h_unif_cont_id := @UniformContinuous.prodMap _ _ _ _ (sInf uas) (sInf ubs) ua ub _ _ ha hb
exact @UniformContinuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ hf h_unif_cont_id
end Prod
section
open UniformSpace Function
variable {δ' : Type*} [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] [UniformSpace γ] [UniformSpace δ]
[UniformSpace δ']
local notation f " ∘₂ " g => Function.bicompr f g
/-- Uniform continuity for functions of two variables. -/
def UniformContinuous₂ (f : α → β → γ) :=
UniformContinuous (uncurry f)
theorem uniformContinuous₂_def (f : α → β → γ) :
UniformContinuous₂ f ↔ UniformContinuous (uncurry f) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem UniformContinuous₂.uniformContinuous {f : α → β → γ} (h : UniformContinuous₂ f) :
UniformContinuous (uncurry f) :=
h
theorem uniformContinuous₂_curry (f : α × β → γ) :
UniformContinuous₂ (Function.curry f) ↔ UniformContinuous f := by
rw [UniformContinuous₂, uncurry_curry]
theorem UniformContinuous₂.comp {f : α → β → γ} {g : γ → δ} (hg : UniformContinuous g)
(hf : UniformContinuous₂ f) : UniformContinuous₂ (g ∘₂ f) :=
hg.comp hf
theorem UniformContinuous₂.bicompl {f : α → β → γ} {ga : δ → α} {gb : δ' → β}
(hf : UniformContinuous₂ f) (hga : UniformContinuous ga) (hgb : UniformContinuous gb) :
UniformContinuous₂ (bicompl f ga gb) :=
hf.uniformContinuous.comp (hga.prodMap hgb)
end
theorem toTopologicalSpace_subtype [u : UniformSpace α] {p : α → Prop} :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace (Subtype p) instUniformSpaceSubtype =
@instTopologicalSpaceSubtype α p u.toTopologicalSpace :=
rfl
section Sum
variable [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
open Sum
-- Obsolete auxiliary definitions and lemmas
/-- Uniformity on a disjoint union. Entourages of the diagonal in the union are obtained
by taking independently an entourage of the diagonal in the first part, and an entourage of
the diagonal in the second part. -/
instance Sum.instUniformSpace : UniformSpace (α ⊕ β) where
uniformity := map (fun p : α × α => (inl p.1, inl p.2)) (𝓤 α) ⊔
map (fun p : β × β => (inr p.1, inr p.2)) (𝓤 β)
symm := fun _ hs ↦ ⟨symm_le_uniformity hs.1, symm_le_uniformity hs.2⟩
comp := fun s hs ↦ by
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs.1 with ⟨tα, htα, Htα⟩
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs.2 with ⟨tβ, htβ, Htβ⟩
filter_upwards [mem_lift' (union_mem_sup (image_mem_map htα) (image_mem_map htβ))]
rintro ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨z, ⟨⟨a, b⟩, hab, ⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨⟨a, b⟩, hab, ⟨⟩⟩, ⟨⟨_, c⟩, hbc, ⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨⟨_, c⟩, hbc, ⟨⟩⟩⟩
exacts [@Htα (_, _) ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩, @Htβ (_, _) ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩]
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity x := by
ext
cases x <;> simp [mem_comap', -mem_comap, nhds_inl, nhds_inr, nhds_eq_comap_uniformity,
Prod.ext_iff]
/-- The union of an entourage of the diagonal in each set of a disjoint union is again an entourage
of the diagonal. -/
theorem union_mem_uniformity_sum {a : Set (α × α)} (ha : a ∈ 𝓤 α) {b : Set (β × β)} (hb : b ∈ 𝓤 β) :
Prod.map inl inl '' a ∪ Prod.map inr inr '' b ∈ 𝓤 (α ⊕ β) :=
union_mem_sup (image_mem_map ha) (image_mem_map hb)
theorem Sum.uniformity : 𝓤 (α ⊕ β) = map (Prod.map inl inl) (𝓤 α) ⊔ map (Prod.map inr inr) (𝓤 β) :=
rfl
lemma uniformContinuous_inl : UniformContinuous (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) := le_sup_left
lemma uniformContinuous_inr : UniformContinuous (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) := le_sup_right
instance [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 α)] [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 β)] :
IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 (α ⊕ β)) := by
rw [Sum.uniformity]
infer_instance
end Sum
end Constructions
/-!
### Expressing continuity properties in uniform spaces
We reformulate the various continuity properties of functions taking values in a uniform space
in terms of the uniformity in the target. Since the same lemmas (essentially with the same names)
also exist for metric spaces and emetric spaces (reformulating things in terms of the distance or
the edistance in the target), we put them in a namespace `Uniform` here.
In the metric and emetric space setting, there are also similar lemmas where one assumes that
both the source and the target are metric spaces, reformulating things in terms of the distance
on both sides. These lemmas are generally written without primes, and the versions where only
the target is a metric space is primed. We follow the same convention here, thus giving lemmas
with primes.
-/
namespace Uniform
variable [UniformSpace α]
theorem tendsto_nhds_right {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (a, u x)) f (𝓤 α) := by
rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
theorem tendsto_nhds_left {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (u x, a)) f (𝓤 α) := by
rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity', tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
theorem continuousAt_iff'_right [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} :
ContinuousAt f b ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f b, f x)) (𝓝 b) (𝓤 α) := by
rw [ContinuousAt, tendsto_nhds_right]
theorem continuousAt_iff'_left [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} :
ContinuousAt f b ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f x, f b)) (𝓝 b) (𝓤 α) := by
rw [ContinuousAt, tendsto_nhds_left]
theorem continuousAt_iff_prod [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} :
ContinuousAt f b ↔ Tendsto (fun x : β × β => (f x.1, f x.2)) (𝓝 (b, b)) (𝓤 α) :=
⟨fun H => le_trans (H.prodMap' H) (nhds_le_uniformity _), fun H =>
continuousAt_iff'_left.2 <| H.comp <| tendsto_id.prodMk_nhds tendsto_const_nhds⟩
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff'_right [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s b ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f b, f x)) (𝓝[s] b) (𝓤 α) := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhds_right]
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff'_left [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s b ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f x, f b)) (𝓝[s] b) (𝓤 α) := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhds_left]
theorem continuousOn_iff'_right [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, Tendsto (fun x => (f b, f x)) (𝓝[s] b) (𝓤 α) := by
simp [ContinuousOn, continuousWithinAt_iff'_right]
theorem continuousOn_iff'_left [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, Tendsto (fun x => (f x, f b)) (𝓝[s] b) (𝓤 α) := by
simp [ContinuousOn, continuousWithinAt_iff'_left]
theorem continuous_iff'_right [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ b, Tendsto (fun x => (f b, f x)) (𝓝 b) (𝓤 α) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => tendsto_nhds_right
theorem continuous_iff'_left [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ b, Tendsto (fun x => (f x, f b)) (𝓝 b) (𝓤 α) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => tendsto_nhds_left
/-- Consider two functions `f` and `g` which coincide on a set `s` and are continuous there.
Then there is an open neighborhood of `s` on which `f` and `g` are uniformly close. -/
lemma exists_is_open_mem_uniformity_of_forall_mem_eq
[TopologicalSpace β] {r : Set (α × α)} {s : Set β}
{f g : β → α} (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ContinuousAt f x) (hg : ∀ x ∈ s, ContinuousAt g x)
(hfg : s.EqOn f g) (hr : r ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t, IsOpen t ∧ s ⊆ t ∧ ∀ x ∈ t, (f x, g x) ∈ r := by
have A : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t, IsOpen t ∧ x ∈ t ∧ ∀ z ∈ t, (f z, g z) ∈ r := by
intro x hx
obtain ⟨t, ht, htsymm, htr⟩ := comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets hr
have A : {z | (f x, f z) ∈ t} ∈ 𝓝 x := (hf x hx).preimage_mem_nhds (mem_nhds_left (f x) ht)
have B : {z | (g x, g z) ∈ t} ∈ 𝓝 x := (hg x hx).preimage_mem_nhds (mem_nhds_left (g x) ht)
rcases _root_.mem_nhds_iff.1 (inter_mem A B) with ⟨u, hu, u_open, xu⟩
refine ⟨u, u_open, xu, fun y hy ↦ ?_⟩
have I1 : (f y, f x) ∈ t := (htsymm.mk_mem_comm).2 (hu hy).1
have I2 : (g x, g y) ∈ t := (hu hy).2
rw [hfg hx] at I1
exact htr (prodMk_mem_compRel I1 I2)
choose! t t_open xt ht using A
refine ⟨⋃ x ∈ s, t x, isOpen_biUnion t_open, fun x hx ↦ mem_biUnion hx (xt x hx), ?_⟩
rintro x hx
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨y, ys, hy⟩
exact ht y ys x hy
end Uniform
theorem Filter.Tendsto.congr_uniformity {α β} [UniformSpace β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} {b : β}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 b)) (hg : Tendsto (fun x => (f x, g x)) l (𝓤 β)) : Tendsto g l (𝓝 b) :=
Uniform.tendsto_nhds_right.2 <| (Uniform.tendsto_nhds_right.1 hf).uniformity_trans hg
theorem Uniform.tendsto_congr {α β} [UniformSpace β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} {b : β}
(hfg : Tendsto (fun x => (f x, g x)) l (𝓤 β)) : Tendsto f l (𝓝 b) ↔ Tendsto g l (𝓝 b) :=
⟨fun h => h.congr_uniformity hfg, fun h => h.congr_uniformity hfg.uniformity_symm⟩
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean | 1,131 | 1,135 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Kexing Ying, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sym
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.BilinearMap
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FiniteDimensional.Lemmas
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Determinant.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.SesquilinearForm
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Symmetric
/-!
# Quadratic maps
This file defines quadratic maps on an `R`-module `M`, taking values in an `R`-module `N`.
An `N`-valued quadratic map on a module `M` over a commutative ring `R` is a map `Q : M → N` such
that:
* `QuadraticMap.map_smul`: `Q (a • x) = (a * a) • Q x`
* `QuadraticMap.polar_add_left`, `QuadraticMap.polar_add_right`,
`QuadraticMap.polar_smul_left`, `QuadraticMap.polar_smul_right`:
the map `QuadraticMap.polar Q := fun x y ↦ Q (x + y) - Q x - Q y` is bilinear.
This notion generalizes to commutative semirings using the approach in [izhakian2016][] which
requires that there be a (possibly non-unique) companion bilinear map `B` such that
`∀ x y, Q (x + y) = Q x + Q y + B x y`. Over a ring, this `B` is precisely `QuadraticMap.polar Q`.
To build a `QuadraticMap` from the `polar` axioms, use `QuadraticMap.ofPolar`.
Quadratic maps come with a scalar multiplication, `(a • Q) x = a • Q x`,
and composition with linear maps `f`, `Q.comp f x = Q (f x)`.
## Main definitions
* `QuadraticMap.ofPolar`: a more familiar constructor that works on rings
* `QuadraticMap.associated`: associated bilinear map
* `QuadraticMap.PosDef`: positive definite quadratic maps
* `QuadraticMap.Anisotropic`: anisotropic quadratic maps
* `QuadraticMap.discr`: discriminant of a quadratic map
* `QuadraticMap.IsOrtho`: orthogonality of vectors with respect to a quadratic map.
## Main statements
* `QuadraticMap.associated_left_inverse`,
* `QuadraticMap.associated_rightInverse`: in a commutative ring where 2 has
an inverse, there is a correspondence between quadratic maps and symmetric
bilinear forms
* `LinearMap.BilinForm.exists_orthogonal_basis`: There exists an orthogonal basis with
respect to any nondegenerate, symmetric bilinear map `B`.
## Notation
In this file, the variable `R` is used when a `CommSemiring` structure is available.
The variable `S` is used when `R` itself has a `•` action.
## Implementation notes
While the definition and many results make sense if we drop commutativity assumptions,
the correct definition of a quadratic maps in the noncommutative setting would require
substantial refactors from the current version, such that $Q(rm) = rQ(m)r^*$ for some
suitable conjugation $r^*$.
The [Zulip thread](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/116395-maths/topic/Quadratic.20Maps/near/395529867)
has some further discussion.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadratic_form
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discriminant#Quadratic_forms
## Tags
quadratic map, homogeneous polynomial, quadratic polynomial
-/
universe u v w
variable {S T : Type*}
variable {R : Type*} {M N P A : Type*}
open LinearMap (BilinMap BilinForm)
section Polar
variable [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup N]
namespace QuadraticMap
/-- Up to a factor 2, `Q.polar` is the associated bilinear map for a quadratic map `Q`.
Source of this name: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadratic_form#Generalization
-/
def polar (f : M → N) (x y : M) :=
f (x + y) - f x - f y
protected theorem map_add (f : M → N) (x y : M) :
f (x + y) = f x + f y + polar f x y := by
rw [polar]
abel
theorem polar_add (f g : M → N) (x y : M) : polar (f + g) x y = polar f x y + polar g x y := by
simp only [polar, Pi.add_apply]
abel
theorem polar_neg (f : M → N) (x y : M) : polar (-f) x y = -polar f x y := by
simp only [polar, Pi.neg_apply, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_add]
theorem polar_smul [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S N] (f : M → N) (s : S) (x y : M) :
polar (s • f) x y = s • polar f x y := by simp only [polar, Pi.smul_apply, smul_sub]
theorem polar_comm (f : M → N) (x y : M) : polar f x y = polar f y x := by
rw [polar, polar, add_comm, sub_sub, sub_sub, add_comm (f x) (f y)]
/-- Auxiliary lemma to express bilinearity of `QuadraticMap.polar` without subtraction. -/
theorem polar_add_left_iff {f : M → N} {x x' y : M} :
polar f (x + x') y = polar f x y + polar f x' y ↔
f (x + x' + y) + (f x + f x' + f y) = f (x + x') + f (x' + y) + f (y + x) := by
simp only [← add_assoc]
simp only [polar, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, eq_sub_iff_add_eq, sub_add_eq_add_sub, add_sub]
simp only [add_right_comm _ (f y) _, add_right_comm _ (f x') (f x)]
rw [add_comm y x, add_right_comm _ _ (f (x + y)), add_comm _ (f (x + y)),
add_right_comm (f (x + y)), add_left_inj]
theorem polar_comp {F : Type*} [AddCommGroup S] [FunLike F N S] [AddMonoidHomClass F N S]
(f : M → N) (g : F) (x y : M) :
polar (g ∘ f) x y = g (polar f x y) := by
simp only [polar, Pi.smul_apply, Function.comp_apply, map_sub]
/-- `QuadraticMap.polar` as a function from `Sym2`. -/
def polarSym2 (f : M → N) : Sym2 M → N :=
Sym2.lift ⟨polar f, polar_comm _⟩
@[simp]
lemma polarSym2_sym2Mk (f : M → N) (xy : M × M) : polarSym2 f (.mk xy) = polar f xy.1 xy.2 := rfl
end QuadraticMap
end Polar
/-- A quadratic map on a module.
For a more familiar constructor when `R` is a ring, see `QuadraticMap.ofPolar`. -/
structure QuadraticMap (R : Type u) (M : Type v) (N : Type w) [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M]
[Module R M] [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N] where
toFun : M → N
toFun_smul : ∀ (a : R) (x : M), toFun (a • x) = (a * a) • toFun x
exists_companion' : ∃ B : BilinMap R M N, ∀ x y, toFun (x + y) = toFun x + toFun y + B x y
section QuadraticForm
variable (R : Type u) (M : Type v) [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
/-- A quadratic form on a module. -/
abbrev QuadraticForm : Type _ := QuadraticMap R M R
end QuadraticForm
namespace QuadraticMap
section DFunLike
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
variable {Q Q' : QuadraticMap R M N}
instance instFunLike : FunLike (QuadraticMap R M N) M N where
coe := toFun
coe_injective' x y h := by cases x; cases y; congr
variable (Q)
/-- The `simp` normal form for a quadratic map is `DFunLike.coe`, not `toFun`. -/
@[simp]
theorem toFun_eq_coe : Q.toFun = ⇑Q :=
rfl
-- this must come after the coe_to_fun definition
initialize_simps_projections QuadraticMap (toFun → apply)
variable {Q}
@[ext]
theorem ext (H : ∀ x : M, Q x = Q' x) : Q = Q' :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ H
theorem congr_fun (h : Q = Q') (x : M) : Q x = Q' x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun h _
/-- Copy of a `QuadraticMap` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
protected def copy (Q : QuadraticMap R M N) (Q' : M → N) (h : Q' = ⇑Q) : QuadraticMap R M N where
toFun := Q'
toFun_smul := h.symm ▸ Q.toFun_smul
exists_companion' := h.symm ▸ Q.exists_companion'
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (Q : QuadraticMap R M N) (Q' : M → N) (h : Q' = ⇑Q) : ⇑(Q.copy Q' h) = Q' :=
rfl
theorem copy_eq (Q : QuadraticMap R M N) (Q' : M → N) (h : Q' = ⇑Q) : Q.copy Q' h = Q :=
DFunLike.ext' h
end DFunLike
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
variable (Q : QuadraticMap R M N)
protected theorem map_smul (a : R) (x : M) : Q (a • x) = (a * a) • Q x :=
Q.toFun_smul a x
theorem exists_companion : ∃ B : BilinMap R M N, ∀ x y, Q (x + y) = Q x + Q y + B x y :=
Q.exists_companion'
theorem map_add_add_add_map (x y z : M) :
Q (x + y + z) + (Q x + Q y + Q z) = Q (x + y) + Q (y + z) + Q (z + x) := by
obtain ⟨B, h⟩ := Q.exists_companion
rw [add_comm z x]
simp only [h, LinearMap.map_add₂]
abel
theorem map_add_self (x : M) : Q (x + x) = 4 • Q x := by
rw [← two_smul R x, Q.map_smul, ← Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul R]
norm_num
-- not @[simp] because it is superseded by `ZeroHomClass.map_zero`
protected theorem map_zero : Q 0 = 0 := by
rw [← @zero_smul R _ _ _ _ (0 : M), Q.map_smul, zero_mul, zero_smul]
instance zeroHomClass : ZeroHomClass (QuadraticMap R M N) M N :=
{ QuadraticMap.instFunLike (R := R) (M := M) (N := N) with map_zero := QuadraticMap.map_zero }
theorem map_smul_of_tower [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S R] [SMul S M] [IsScalarTower S R M]
[Module S N] [IsScalarTower S R N] (a : S)
(x : M) : Q (a • x) = (a * a) • Q x := by
rw [← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_smul R a x, Q.map_smul, ← RingHom.map_mul, algebraMap_smul]
end CommSemiring
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup N]
variable [Module R M] [Module R N] (Q : QuadraticMap R M N)
@[simp]
protected theorem map_neg (x : M) : Q (-x) = Q x := by
rw [← @neg_one_smul R _ _ _ _ x, Q.map_smul, neg_one_mul, neg_neg, one_smul]
protected theorem map_sub (x y : M) : Q (x - y) = Q (y - x) := by rw [← neg_sub, Q.map_neg]
@[simp]
theorem polar_zero_left (y : M) : polar Q 0 y = 0 := by
simp only [polar, zero_add, QuadraticMap.map_zero, sub_zero, sub_self]
@[simp]
theorem polar_add_left (x x' y : M) : polar Q (x + x') y = polar Q x y + polar Q x' y :=
polar_add_left_iff.mpr <| Q.map_add_add_add_map x x' y
@[simp]
theorem polar_smul_left (a : R) (x y : M) : polar Q (a • x) y = a • polar Q x y := by
obtain ⟨B, h⟩ := Q.exists_companion
simp_rw [polar, h, Q.map_smul, LinearMap.map_smul₂, sub_sub, add_sub_cancel_left]
@[simp]
theorem polar_neg_left (x y : M) : polar Q (-x) y = -polar Q x y := by
rw [← neg_one_smul R x, polar_smul_left, neg_one_smul]
@[simp]
theorem polar_sub_left (x x' y : M) : polar Q (x - x') y = polar Q x y - polar Q x' y := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, polar_add_left, polar_neg_left]
@[simp]
theorem polar_zero_right (y : M) : polar Q y 0 = 0 := by
simp only [add_zero, polar, QuadraticMap.map_zero, sub_self]
@[simp]
theorem polar_add_right (x y y' : M) : polar Q x (y + y') = polar Q x y + polar Q x y' := by
rw [polar_comm Q x, polar_comm Q x, polar_comm Q x, polar_add_left]
|
@[simp]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/QuadraticForm/Basic.lean | 281 | 282 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 David Wärn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Wärn
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.NatIso
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EqToHom
/-!
# Quotient category
Constructs the quotient of a category by an arbitrary family of relations on its hom-sets,
by introducing a type synonym for the objects, and identifying homs as necessary.
This is analogous to 'the quotient of a group by the normal closure of a subset', rather
than 'the quotient of a group by a normal subgroup'. When taking the quotient by a congruence
relation, `functor_map_eq_iff` says that no unnecessary identifications have been made.
-/
/-- A `HomRel` on `C` consists of a relation on every hom-set. -/
def HomRel (C) [Quiver C] :=
∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄, (X ⟶ Y) → (X ⟶ Y) → Prop
-- The `Inhabited` instance should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
instance (C) [Quiver C] : Inhabited (HomRel C) where
default := fun _ _ _ _ ↦ PUnit
namespace CategoryTheory
section
variable {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D] (F : C ⥤ D)
/-- A functor induces a `HomRel` on its domain, relating those maps that have the same image. -/
def Functor.homRel : HomRel C :=
fun _ _ f g ↦ F.map f = F.map g
@[simp]
lemma Functor.homRel_iff {X Y : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y) :
F.homRel f g ↔ F.map f = F.map g := Iff.rfl
end
variable {C : Type _} [Category C] (r : HomRel C)
/-- A `HomRel` is a congruence when it's an equivalence on every hom-set, and it can be composed
from left and right. -/
class Congruence : Prop where
/-- `r` is an equivalence on every hom-set. -/
equivalence : ∀ {X Y}, _root_.Equivalence (@r X Y)
/-- Precomposition with an arrow respects `r`. -/
compLeft : ∀ {X Y Z} (f : X ⟶ Y) {g g' : Y ⟶ Z}, r g g' → r (f ≫ g) (f ≫ g')
/-- Postcomposition with an arrow respects `r`. -/
compRight : ∀ {X Y Z} {f f' : X ⟶ Y} (g : Y ⟶ Z), r f f' → r (f ≫ g) (f' ≫ g)
/-- For `F : C ⥤ D`, `F.homRel` is a congruence. -/
instance Functor.congruence_homRel {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D] (F : C ⥤ D) :
Congruence F.homRel where
equivalence :=
{ refl := fun _ ↦ rfl
symm := by aesop
trans := by aesop }
compLeft := by aesop
compRight := by aesop
/-- A type synonym for `C`, thought of as the objects of the quotient category. -/
@[ext]
structure Quotient (r : HomRel C) where
/-- The object of `C`. -/
as : C
instance [Inhabited C] : Inhabited (Quotient r) :=
⟨{ as := default }⟩
namespace Quotient
/-- Generates the closure of a family of relations w.r.t. composition from left and right. -/
inductive CompClosure (r : HomRel C) ⦃s t : C⦄ : (s ⟶ t) → (s ⟶ t) → Prop
| intro {a b : C} (f : s ⟶ a) (m₁ m₂ : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ t) (h : r m₁ m₂) :
CompClosure r (f ≫ m₁ ≫ g) (f ≫ m₂ ≫ g)
theorem CompClosure.of {a b : C} (m₁ m₂ : a ⟶ b) (h : r m₁ m₂) : CompClosure r m₁ m₂ := by
simpa using CompClosure.intro (𝟙 _) m₁ m₂ (𝟙 _) h
theorem comp_left {a b c : C} (f : a ⟶ b) :
∀ (g₁ g₂ : b ⟶ c) (_ : CompClosure r g₁ g₂), CompClosure r (f ≫ g₁) (f ≫ g₂)
| _, _, ⟨x, m₁, m₂, y, h⟩ => by simpa using CompClosure.intro (f ≫ x) m₁ m₂ y h
theorem comp_right {a b c : C} (g : b ⟶ c) :
∀ (f₁ f₂ : a ⟶ b) (_ : CompClosure r f₁ f₂), CompClosure r (f₁ ≫ g) (f₂ ≫ g)
| _, _, ⟨x, m₁, m₂, y, h⟩ => by simpa using CompClosure.intro x m₁ m₂ (y ≫ g) h
/-- Hom-sets of the quotient category. -/
def Hom (s t : Quotient r) :=
Quot <| @CompClosure C _ r s.as t.as
instance (a : Quotient r) : Inhabited (Hom r a a) :=
⟨Quot.mk _ (𝟙 a.as)⟩
/-- Composition in the quotient category. -/
def comp ⦃a b c : Quotient r⦄ : Hom r a b → Hom r b c → Hom r a c := fun hf hg ↦
Quot.liftOn hf
(fun f ↦
Quot.liftOn hg (fun g ↦ Quot.mk _ (f ≫ g)) fun g₁ g₂ h ↦
Quot.sound <| comp_left r f g₁ g₂ h)
fun f₁ f₂ h ↦ Quot.inductionOn hg fun g ↦ Quot.sound <| comp_right r g f₁ f₂ h
@[simp]
theorem comp_mk {a b c : Quotient r} (f : a.as ⟶ b.as) (g : b.as ⟶ c.as) :
comp r (Quot.mk _ f) (Quot.mk _ g) = Quot.mk _ (f ≫ g) :=
rfl
-- Porting note: Had to manually add the proofs of `comp_id` `id_comp` and `assoc`
instance category : Category (Quotient r) where
Hom := Hom r
id a := Quot.mk _ (𝟙 a.as)
comp := @comp _ _ r
comp_id f := Quot.inductionOn f <| by simp
id_comp f := Quot.inductionOn f <| by simp
assoc f g h := Quot.inductionOn f <| Quot.inductionOn g <| Quot.inductionOn h <| by simp
/-- The functor from a category to its quotient. -/
def functor : C ⥤ Quotient r where
obj a := { as := a }
map := @fun _ _ f ↦ Quot.mk _ f
instance full_functor : (functor r).Full where
map_surjective f := ⟨Quot.out f, by simp [functor]⟩
instance essSurj_functor : (functor r).EssSurj where
mem_essImage Y :=
⟨Y.as, ⟨eqToIso (by
ext
rfl)⟩⟩
protected theorem induction {P : ∀ {a b : Quotient r}, (a ⟶ b) → Prop}
(h : ∀ {x y : C} (f : x ⟶ y), P ((functor r).map f)) :
∀ {a b : Quotient r} (f : a ⟶ b), P f := by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩ ⟨f⟩
exact h f
protected theorem sound {a b : C} {f₁ f₂ : a ⟶ b} (h : r f₁ f₂) :
(functor r).map f₁ = (functor r).map f₂ := by
simpa using Quot.sound (CompClosure.intro (𝟙 a) f₁ f₂ (𝟙 b) h)
lemma compClosure_iff_self [h : Congruence r] {X Y : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y) :
CompClosure r f g ↔ r f g := by
constructor
· intro hfg
induction' hfg with m m' hm
exact Congruence.compLeft _ (Congruence.compRight _ (by assumption))
· exact CompClosure.of _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem compClosure_eq_self [h : Congruence r] :
CompClosure r = r := by
ext
simp only [compClosure_iff_self]
theorem functor_map_eq_iff [h : Congruence r] {X Y : C} (f f' : X ⟶ Y) :
(functor r).map f = (functor r).map f' ↔ r f f' := by
dsimp [functor]
rw [Equivalence.quot_mk_eq_iff, compClosure_eq_self r]
simpa only [compClosure_eq_self r] using h.equivalence
theorem functor_homRel_eq_compClosure_eqvGen {X Y : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y) :
(functor r).homRel f g ↔ Relation.EqvGen (@CompClosure C _ r X Y) f g :=
Quot.eq
theorem compClosure.congruence :
Congruence fun X Y => Relation.EqvGen (@CompClosure C _ r X Y) := by
convert inferInstanceAs (Congruence (functor r).homRel)
ext
rw [functor_homRel_eq_compClosure_eqvGen]
|
variable {D : Type _} [Category D] (F : C ⥤ D)
/-- The induced functor on the quotient category. -/
def lift (H : ∀ (x y : C) (f₁ f₂ : x ⟶ y), r f₁ f₂ → F.map f₁ = F.map f₂) : Quotient r ⥤ D where
obj a := F.obj a.as
map := @fun a b hf ↦
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Quotient.lean | 177 | 183 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.AbstractFuncEq
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.ModularForms.JacobiTheta.Bounds
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.MellinEqDirichlet
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.Basic
/-!
# Odd Hurwitz zeta functions
In this file we study the functions on `ℂ` which are the analytic continuation of the following
series (convergent for `1 < re s`), where `a ∈ ℝ` is a parameter:
`hurwitzZetaOdd a s = 1 / 2 * ∑' n : ℤ, sgn (n + a) / |n + a| ^ s`
and
`sinZeta a s = ∑' n : ℕ, sin (2 * π * a * n) / n ^ s`.
The term for `n = -a` in the first sum is understood as 0 if `a` is an integer, as is the term for
`n = 0` in the second sum (for all `a`). Note that these functions are differentiable everywhere,
unlike their even counterparts which have poles.
Of course, we cannot *define* these functions by the above formulae (since existence of the
analytic continuation is not at all obvious); we in fact construct them as Mellin transforms of
various versions of the Jacobi theta function.
## Main definitions and theorems
* `completedHurwitzZetaOdd`: the completed Hurwitz zeta function
* `completedSinZeta`: the completed cosine zeta function
* `differentiable_completedHurwitzZetaOdd` and `differentiable_completedSinZeta`:
differentiability on `ℂ`
* `completedHurwitzZetaOdd_one_sub`: the functional equation
`completedHurwitzZetaOdd a (1 - s) = completedSinZeta a s`
* `hasSum_int_hurwitzZetaOdd` and `hasSum_nat_sinZeta`: relation between
the zeta functions and corresponding Dirichlet series for `1 < re s`
-/
noncomputable section
open Complex hiding abs_of_nonneg
open CharZero Filter Topology Asymptotics Real Set MeasureTheory
open scoped ComplexConjugate
namespace HurwitzZeta
section kernel_defs
/-!
## Definitions and elementary properties of kernels
-/
/-- Variant of `jacobiTheta₂'` which we introduce to simplify some formulae. -/
def jacobiTheta₂'' (z τ : ℂ) : ℂ :=
cexp (π * I * z ^ 2 * τ) * (jacobiTheta₂' (z * τ) τ / (2 * π * I) + z * jacobiTheta₂ (z * τ) τ)
lemma jacobiTheta₂''_conj (z τ : ℂ) :
conj (jacobiTheta₂'' z τ) = jacobiTheta₂'' (conj z) (-conj τ) := by
simp [jacobiTheta₂'', jacobiTheta₂'_conj, jacobiTheta₂_conj, ← exp_conj, map_ofNat, div_neg,
neg_div, jacobiTheta₂'_neg_left]
/-- Restatement of `jacobiTheta₂'_add_left'`: the function `jacobiTheta₂''` is 1-periodic in `z`. -/
lemma jacobiTheta₂''_add_left (z τ : ℂ) : jacobiTheta₂'' (z + 1) τ = jacobiTheta₂'' z τ := by
simp only [jacobiTheta₂'', add_mul z 1, one_mul, jacobiTheta₂'_add_left', jacobiTheta₂_add_left']
generalize jacobiTheta₂ (z * τ) τ = J
generalize jacobiTheta₂' (z * τ) τ = J'
-- clear denominator
simp_rw [div_add' _ _ _ two_pi_I_ne_zero, ← mul_div_assoc]
refine congr_arg (· / (2 * π * I)) ?_
-- get all exponential terms to left
rw [mul_left_comm _ (cexp _), ← mul_add, mul_assoc (cexp _), ← mul_add, ← mul_assoc (cexp _),
← Complex.exp_add]
congrm (cexp ?_ * ?_) <;> ring
lemma jacobiTheta₂''_neg_left (z τ : ℂ) : jacobiTheta₂'' (-z) τ = -jacobiTheta₂'' z τ := by
simp [jacobiTheta₂'', jacobiTheta₂'_neg_left, neg_div, -neg_add_rev, ← neg_add]
lemma jacobiTheta₂'_functional_equation' (z τ : ℂ) :
jacobiTheta₂' z τ = (-2 * π) / (-I * τ) ^ (3 / 2 : ℂ) * jacobiTheta₂'' z (-1 / τ) := by
rcases eq_or_ne τ 0 with rfl | hτ
· rw [jacobiTheta₂'_undef _ (by simp), mul_zero, zero_cpow (by norm_num), div_zero, zero_mul]
have aux1 : (-2 * π : ℂ) / (2 * π * I) = I := by
rw [div_eq_iff two_pi_I_ne_zero, mul_comm I, mul_assoc _ I I, I_mul_I, neg_mul, mul_neg,
mul_one]
rw [jacobiTheta₂'_functional_equation, ← mul_one_div _ τ, mul_right_comm _ (cexp _),
(by rw [cpow_one, ← div_div, div_self (neg_ne_zero.mpr I_ne_zero)] :
1 / τ = -I / (-I * τ) ^ (1 : ℂ)), div_mul_div_comm,
← cpow_add _ _ (mul_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.mpr I_ne_zero) hτ), ← div_mul_eq_mul_div,
(by norm_num : (1 / 2 + 1 : ℂ) = 3 / 2), mul_assoc (1 / _), mul_assoc (1 / _),
← mul_one_div (-2 * π : ℂ), mul_comm _ (1 / _), mul_assoc (1 / _)]
congr 1
rw [jacobiTheta₂'', div_add' _ _ _ two_pi_I_ne_zero, ← mul_div_assoc, ← mul_div_assoc,
← div_mul_eq_mul_div (-2 * π : ℂ), mul_assoc, aux1, mul_div z (-1), mul_neg_one, neg_div τ z,
jacobiTheta₂_neg_left, jacobiTheta₂'_neg_left, neg_mul, ← mul_neg, ← mul_neg,
mul_div, mul_neg_one, neg_div, neg_mul, neg_mul, neg_div]
congr 2
rw [neg_sub, ← sub_eq_neg_add, mul_comm _ (_ * I), ← mul_assoc]
/-- Odd Hurwitz zeta kernel (function whose Mellin transform will be the odd part of the completed
Hurwitz zeta function). See `oddKernel_def` for the defining formula, and `hasSum_int_oddKernel`
for an expression as a sum over `ℤ`.
-/
@[irreducible] def oddKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(show Function.Periodic (fun a : ℝ ↦ re (jacobiTheta₂'' a (I * x))) 1 by
intro a; simp [jacobiTheta₂''_add_left]).lift a
lemma oddKernel_def (a x : ℝ) : ↑(oddKernel a x) = jacobiTheta₂'' a (I * x) := by
simp [oddKernel, ← conj_eq_iff_re, jacobiTheta₂''_conj]
lemma oddKernel_def' (a x : ℝ) : ↑(oddKernel ↑a x) = cexp (-π * a ^ 2 * x) *
(jacobiTheta₂' (a * I * x) (I * x) / (2 * π * I) + a * jacobiTheta₂ (a * I * x) (I * x)) := by
rw [oddKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂'', ← mul_assoc ↑a I x,
(by ring : ↑π * I * ↑a ^ 2 * (I * ↑x) = I ^ 2 * ↑π * ↑a ^ 2 * x), I_sq, neg_one_mul]
lemma oddKernel_undef (a : UnitAddCircle) {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) : oddKernel a x = 0 := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with | H a' =>
rw [← ofReal_eq_zero, oddKernel_def', jacobiTheta₂_undef, jacobiTheta₂'_undef, zero_div, zero_add,
mul_zero, mul_zero] <;>
simpa
/-- Auxiliary function appearing in the functional equation for the odd Hurwitz zeta kernel, equal
to `∑ (n : ℕ), 2 * n * sin (2 * π * n * a) * exp (-π * n ^ 2 * x)`. See `hasSum_nat_sinKernel`
for the defining sum. -/
@[irreducible] def sinKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(show Function.Periodic (fun ξ : ℝ ↦ re (jacobiTheta₂' ξ (I * x) / (-2 * π))) 1 by
intro ξ; simp [jacobiTheta₂'_add_left]).lift a
lemma sinKernel_def (a x : ℝ) : ↑(sinKernel ↑a x) = jacobiTheta₂' a (I * x) / (-2 * π) := by
simp [sinKernel, re_eq_add_conj, jacobiTheta₂'_conj, map_ofNat]
lemma sinKernel_undef (a : UnitAddCircle) {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) : sinKernel a x = 0 := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with
| H a => rw [← ofReal_eq_zero, sinKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂'_undef _ (by simpa), zero_div]
lemma oddKernel_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) : oddKernel (-a) x = -oddKernel a x := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with
| H a => simp [← ofReal_inj, ← QuotientAddGroup.mk_neg, oddKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂''_neg_left]
@[simp] lemma oddKernel_zero (x : ℝ) : oddKernel 0 x = 0 := by
simpa using oddKernel_neg 0 x
lemma sinKernel_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) :
sinKernel (-a) x = -sinKernel a x := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with
| H a => simp [← ofReal_inj, ← QuotientAddGroup.mk_neg, sinKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂'_neg_left,
neg_div]
@[simp] lemma sinKernel_zero (x : ℝ) : sinKernel 0 x = 0 := by
simpa using sinKernel_neg 0 x
/-- The odd kernel is continuous on `Ioi 0`. -/
lemma continuousOn_oddKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) : ContinuousOn (oddKernel a) (Ioi 0) := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with | H a =>
suffices ContinuousOn (fun x ↦ (oddKernel a x : ℂ)) (Ioi 0) from
(continuous_re.comp_continuousOn this).congr fun a _ ↦ (ofReal_re _).symm
simp_rw [oddKernel_def' a]
refine fun x hx ↦ ((Continuous.continuousAt ?_).mul ?_).continuousWithinAt
· fun_prop
· have hf : Continuous fun u : ℝ ↦ (a * I * u, I * u) := by fun_prop
apply ContinuousAt.add
· exact ((continuousAt_jacobiTheta₂' (a * I * x) (by rwa [I_mul_im, ofReal_re])).comp
(f := fun u : ℝ ↦ (a * I * u, I * u)) hf.continuousAt).div_const _
· exact continuousAt_const.mul <| (continuousAt_jacobiTheta₂ (a * I * x)
(by rwa [I_mul_im, ofReal_re])).comp (f := fun u : ℝ ↦ (a * I * u, I * u)) hf.continuousAt
lemma continuousOn_sinKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) : ContinuousOn (sinKernel a) (Ioi 0) := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with | H a =>
suffices ContinuousOn (fun x ↦ (sinKernel a x : ℂ)) (Ioi 0) from
(continuous_re.comp_continuousOn this).congr fun a _ ↦ (ofReal_re _).symm
simp_rw [sinKernel_def]
apply (continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt (fun x hx ↦ ?_)).div_const
have h := continuousAt_jacobiTheta₂' a (by rwa [I_mul_im, ofReal_re])
fun_prop
lemma oddKernel_functional_equation (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) :
oddKernel a x = 1 / x ^ (3 / 2 : ℝ) * sinKernel a (1 / x) := by
-- first reduce to `0 < x`
rcases le_or_lt x 0 with hx | hx
· rw [oddKernel_undef _ hx, sinKernel_undef _ (one_div_nonpos.mpr hx), mul_zero]
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with | H a =>
have h1 : -1 / (I * ↑(1 / x)) = I * x := by rw [one_div, ofReal_inv, mul_comm, ← div_div,
div_inv_eq_mul, div_eq_mul_inv, inv_I, mul_neg, neg_one_mul, neg_mul, neg_neg, mul_comm]
have h2 : (-I * (I * ↑(1 / x))) = 1 / x := by
rw [← mul_assoc, neg_mul, I_mul_I, neg_neg, one_mul, ofReal_div, ofReal_one]
have h3 : (x : ℂ) ^ (3 / 2 : ℂ) ≠ 0 := by
simp only [Ne, cpow_eq_zero_iff, ofReal_eq_zero, hx.ne', false_and, not_false_eq_true]
have h4 : arg x ≠ π := by rw [arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hx.le]; exact pi_ne_zero.symm
rw [← ofReal_inj, oddKernel_def, ofReal_mul, sinKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂'_functional_equation',
h1, h2]
generalize jacobiTheta₂'' a (I * ↑x) = J
rw [one_div (x : ℂ), inv_cpow _ _ h4, div_inv_eq_mul, one_div, ofReal_inv, ofReal_cpow hx.le,
ofReal_div, ofReal_ofNat, ofReal_ofNat, ← mul_div_assoc _ _ (-2 * π : ℂ),
eq_div_iff <| mul_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.mpr two_ne_zero) (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr pi_ne_zero),
← div_eq_inv_mul, eq_div_iff h3, mul_comm J _, mul_right_comm]
end kernel_defs
section sum_formulas
/-!
## Formulae for the kernels as sums
-/
lemma hasSum_int_oddKernel (a : ℝ) {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) :
HasSum (fun n : ℤ ↦ (n + a) * rexp (-π * (n + a) ^ 2 * x)) (oddKernel ↑a x) := by
rw [← hasSum_ofReal, oddKernel_def' a x]
have h1 := hasSum_jacobiTheta₂_term (a * I * x) (by rwa [I_mul_im, ofReal_re])
have h2 := hasSum_jacobiTheta₂'_term (a * I * x) (by rwa [I_mul_im, ofReal_re])
refine (((h2.div_const (2 * π * I)).add (h1.mul_left ↑a)).mul_left
(cexp (-π * a ^ 2 * x))).congr_fun (fun n ↦ ?_)
rw [jacobiTheta₂'_term, mul_assoc (2 * π * I), mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ two_pi_I_ne_zero, ← add_mul,
mul_left_comm, jacobiTheta₂_term, ← Complex.exp_add]
push_cast
simp only [← mul_assoc, ← add_mul]
congrm _ * cexp (?_ * x)
simp only [mul_right_comm _ I, add_mul, mul_assoc _ I, I_mul_I]
ring_nf
lemma hasSum_int_sinKernel (a : ℝ) {t : ℝ} (ht : 0 < t) : HasSum
(fun n : ℤ ↦ -I * n * cexp (2 * π * I * a * n) * rexp (-π * n ^ 2 * t)) ↑(sinKernel a t) := by
have h : -2 * (π : ℂ) ≠ (0 : ℂ) := by
simp only [neg_mul, ne_eq, neg_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero,
OfNat.ofNat_ne_zero, ofReal_eq_zero, pi_ne_zero, or_self, not_false_eq_true]
rw [sinKernel_def]
refine ((hasSum_jacobiTheta₂'_term a
(by rwa [I_mul_im, ofReal_re])).div_const _).congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
rw [jacobiTheta₂'_term, jacobiTheta₂_term, ofReal_exp, mul_assoc (-I * n), ← Complex.exp_add,
eq_div_iff h, ofReal_mul, ofReal_mul, ofReal_pow, ofReal_neg, ofReal_intCast,
mul_comm _ (-2 * π : ℂ), ← mul_assoc]
congrm ?_ * cexp (?_ + ?_)
· simp [mul_assoc]
· exact mul_right_comm (2 * π * I) a n
· simp [← mul_assoc, mul_comm _ I]
lemma hasSum_nat_sinKernel (a : ℝ) {t : ℝ} (ht : 0 < t) :
HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ 2 * n * Real.sin (2 * π * a * n) * rexp (-π * n ^ 2 * t))
(sinKernel ↑a t) := by
rw [← hasSum_ofReal]
have := (hasSum_int_sinKernel a ht).nat_add_neg
simp only [Int.cast_zero, sq (0 : ℂ), zero_mul, mul_zero, add_zero] at this
refine this.congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
simp_rw [Int.cast_neg, neg_sq, mul_neg, ofReal_mul, Int.cast_natCast, ofReal_natCast,
ofReal_ofNat, ← add_mul, ofReal_sin, Complex.sin]
push_cast
congr 1
rw [← mul_div_assoc, ← div_mul_eq_mul_div, ← div_mul_eq_mul_div, div_self two_ne_zero, one_mul,
neg_mul, neg_mul, neg_neg, mul_comm _ I, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm _ I, neg_mul,
← sub_eq_neg_add, mul_sub]
congr 3 <;> ring
end sum_formulas
section asymp
/-!
## Asymptotics of the kernels as `t → ∞`
-/
/-- The function `oddKernel a` has exponential decay at `+∞`, for any `a`. -/
lemma isBigO_atTop_oddKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) :
∃ p, 0 < p ∧ IsBigO atTop (oddKernel a) (fun x ↦ Real.exp (-p * x)) := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with | H b =>
obtain ⟨p, hp, hp'⟩ := HurwitzKernelBounds.isBigO_atTop_F_int_one b
refine ⟨p, hp, (Eventually.isBigO ?_).trans hp'⟩
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 0] with t ht
simpa [← (hasSum_int_oddKernel b ht).tsum_eq, HurwitzKernelBounds.F_int,
HurwitzKernelBounds.f_int, abs_of_nonneg (exp_pos _).le] using
norm_tsum_le_tsum_norm (hasSum_int_oddKernel b ht).summable.norm
/-- The function `sinKernel a` has exponential decay at `+∞`, for any `a`. -/
lemma isBigO_atTop_sinKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) :
∃ p, 0 < p ∧ IsBigO atTop (sinKernel a) (fun x ↦ Real.exp (-p * x)) := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with | H a =>
obtain ⟨p, hp, hp'⟩ := HurwitzKernelBounds.isBigO_atTop_F_nat_one (le_refl 0)
refine ⟨p, hp, (Eventually.isBigO ?_).trans (hp'.const_mul_left 2)⟩
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 0] with t ht
rw [HurwitzKernelBounds.F_nat, ← (hasSum_nat_sinKernel a ht).tsum_eq]
apply tsum_of_norm_bounded (g := fun n ↦ 2 * HurwitzKernelBounds.f_nat 1 0 t n)
· exact (HurwitzKernelBounds.summable_f_nat 1 0 ht).hasSum.mul_left _
· intro n
rw [norm_mul, norm_mul, norm_mul, norm_two, mul_assoc, mul_assoc,
mul_le_mul_iff_of_pos_left two_pos, HurwitzKernelBounds.f_nat, pow_one, add_zero,
norm_of_nonneg (exp_pos _).le, Real.norm_eq_abs, Nat.abs_cast, ← mul_assoc,
mul_le_mul_iff_of_pos_right (exp_pos _)]
exact mul_le_of_le_one_right (Nat.cast_nonneg _) (abs_sin_le_one _)
end asymp
section FEPair
/-!
## Construction of an FE-pair
-/
/-- A `StrongFEPair` structure with `f = oddKernel a` and `g = sinKernel a`. -/
@[simps]
def hurwitzOddFEPair (a : UnitAddCircle) : StrongFEPair ℂ where
f := ofReal ∘ oddKernel a
g := ofReal ∘ sinKernel a
hf_int := (continuous_ofReal.comp_continuousOn (continuousOn_oddKernel a)).locallyIntegrableOn
measurableSet_Ioi
hg_int := (continuous_ofReal.comp_continuousOn (continuousOn_sinKernel a)).locallyIntegrableOn
measurableSet_Ioi
k := 3 / 2
hk := by norm_num
ε := 1
hε := one_ne_zero
f₀ := 0
hf₀ := rfl
g₀ := 0
hg₀ := rfl
hf_top r := by
let ⟨v, hv, hv'⟩ := isBigO_atTop_oddKernel a
rw [← isBigO_norm_left] at hv' ⊢
simpa using hv'.trans (isLittleO_exp_neg_mul_rpow_atTop hv _).isBigO
hg_top r := by
let ⟨v, hv, hv'⟩ := isBigO_atTop_sinKernel a
rw [← isBigO_norm_left] at hv' ⊢
simpa using hv'.trans (isLittleO_exp_neg_mul_rpow_atTop hv _).isBigO
h_feq x hx := by simp [← ofReal_mul, oddKernel_functional_equation a, inv_rpow (le_of_lt hx)]
end FEPair
/-!
## Definition of the completed odd Hurwitz zeta function
-/
/-- The entire function of `s` which agrees with
`1 / 2 * Gamma ((s + 1) / 2) * π ^ (-(s + 1) / 2) * ∑' (n : ℤ), sgn (n + a) / |n + a| ^ s`
for `1 < re s`.
-/
def completedHurwitzZetaOdd (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) : ℂ :=
((hurwitzOddFEPair a).Λ ((s + 1) / 2)) / 2
lemma differentiable_completedHurwitzZetaOdd (a : UnitAddCircle) :
Differentiable ℂ (completedHurwitzZetaOdd a) :=
((hurwitzOddFEPair a).differentiable_Λ.comp
((differentiable_id.add_const 1).div_const 2)).div_const 2
/-- The entire function of `s` which agrees with
` Gamma ((s + 1) / 2) * π ^ (-(s + 1) / 2) * ∑' (n : ℕ), sin (2 * π * a * n) / n ^ s`
for `1 < re s`.
-/
def completedSinZeta (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) : ℂ :=
((hurwitzOddFEPair a).symm.Λ ((s + 1) / 2)) / 2
lemma differentiable_completedSinZeta (a : UnitAddCircle) :
Differentiable ℂ (completedSinZeta a) :=
((hurwitzOddFEPair a).symm.differentiable_Λ.comp
((differentiable_id.add_const 1).div_const 2)).div_const 2
/-!
## Parity and functional equations
-/
lemma completedHurwitzZetaOdd_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedHurwitzZetaOdd (-a) s = -completedHurwitzZetaOdd a s := by
simp [completedHurwitzZetaOdd, StrongFEPair.Λ, hurwitzOddFEPair, mellin, oddKernel_neg,
integral_neg, neg_div]
lemma completedSinZeta_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedSinZeta (-a) s = -completedSinZeta a s := by
simp [completedSinZeta, StrongFEPair.Λ, mellin, StrongFEPair.symm, WeakFEPair.symm,
hurwitzOddFEPair, sinKernel_neg, integral_neg, neg_div]
/-- Functional equation for the odd Hurwitz zeta function. -/
theorem completedHurwitzZetaOdd_one_sub (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedHurwitzZetaOdd a (1 - s) = completedSinZeta a s := by
rw [completedHurwitzZetaOdd, completedSinZeta,
(by { push_cast; ring } : (1 - s + 1) / 2 = ↑(3 / 2 : ℝ) - (s + 1) / 2),
← hurwitzOddFEPair_k, (hurwitzOddFEPair a).functional_equation ((s + 1) / 2),
hurwitzOddFEPair_ε, one_smul]
/-- Functional equation for the odd Hurwitz zeta function (alternative form). -/
lemma completedSinZeta_one_sub (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
completedSinZeta a (1 - s) = completedHurwitzZetaOdd a s := by
simp [← completedHurwitzZetaOdd_one_sub]
/-!
## Relation to the Dirichlet series for `1 < re s`
-/
/-- Formula for `completedSinZeta` as a Dirichlet series in the convergence range
(first version, with sum over `ℤ`). -/
lemma hasSum_int_completedSinZeta (a : ℝ) {s : ℂ} (hs : 1 < re s) :
HasSum (fun n : ℤ ↦ Gammaℝ (s + 1) * (-I) * Int.sign n *
cexp (2 * π * I * a * n) / (↑|n| : ℂ) ^ s / 2) (completedSinZeta a s) := by
let c (n : ℤ) : ℂ := -I * cexp (2 * π * I * a * n) / 2
have hc (n : ℤ) : ‖c n‖ = 1 / 2 := by
simp_rw [c, (by { push_cast; ring } : 2 * π * I * a * n = ↑(2 * π * a * n) * I), norm_div,
RCLike.norm_ofNat, norm_mul, norm_neg, norm_I, one_mul, norm_exp_ofReal_mul_I]
have hF t (ht : 0 < t) :
HasSum (fun n ↦ c n * n * rexp (-π * n ^ 2 * t)) (sinKernel a t / 2) := by
refine ((hasSum_int_sinKernel a ht).div_const 2).congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, div_mul_eq_mul_div, mul_right_comm (-I)]
have h_sum : Summable fun i ↦ ‖c i‖ / |↑i| ^ s.re := by
simp_rw [hc, div_right_comm]
apply Summable.div_const
apply Summable.of_nat_of_neg <;>
simpa
refine (mellin_div_const .. ▸ hasSum_mellin_pi_mul_sq' (zero_lt_one.trans hs) hF h_sum).congr_fun
fun n ↦ ?_
simp [Int.sign_eq_sign, ← Int.cast_abs] -- non-terminal simp OK when `ring` follows
ring
/-- Formula for `completedSinZeta` as a Dirichlet series in the convergence range
(second version, with sum over `ℕ`). -/
lemma hasSum_nat_completedSinZeta (a : ℝ) {s : ℂ} (hs : 1 < re s) :
HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ Gammaℝ (s + 1) * Real.sin (2 * π * a * n) / (n : ℂ) ^ s)
(completedSinZeta a s) := by
have := (hasSum_int_completedSinZeta a hs).nat_add_neg
simp_rw [Int.sign_zero, Int.cast_zero, mul_zero, zero_mul, zero_div, add_zero, abs_neg,
Int.sign_neg, Nat.abs_cast, Int.cast_neg, Int.cast_natCast, ← add_div] at this
refine this.congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
rw [div_right_comm]
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with rfl | h
· simp
simp_rw [Int.sign_natCast_of_ne_zero h, Int.cast_one, ofReal_sin, Complex.sin]
simp only [← mul_div_assoc, push_cast, mul_assoc (Gammaℝ _), ← mul_add]
congr 3
rw [mul_one, mul_neg_one, neg_neg, neg_mul I, ← sub_eq_neg_add, ← mul_sub, mul_comm,
mul_neg, neg_mul]
congr 3 <;> ring
/-- Formula for `completedHurwitzZetaOdd` as a Dirichlet series in the convergence range. -/
lemma hasSum_int_completedHurwitzZetaOdd (a : ℝ) {s : ℂ} (hs : 1 < re s) :
HasSum (fun n : ℤ ↦ Gammaℝ (s + 1) * SignType.sign (n + a) / (↑|n + a| : ℂ) ^ s / 2)
(completedHurwitzZetaOdd a s) := by
let r (n : ℤ) : ℝ := n + a
let c (n : ℤ) : ℂ := 1 / 2
have hF t (ht : 0 < t) : HasSum (fun n ↦ c n * r n * rexp (-π * (r n) ^ 2 * t))
(oddKernel a t / 2) := by
refine ((hasSum_ofReal.mpr (hasSum_int_oddKernel a ht)).div_const 2).congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
simp [r, c, push_cast, div_mul_eq_mul_div, -one_div]
have h_sum : Summable fun i ↦ ‖c i‖ / |r i| ^ s.re := by
simp_rw [c, ← mul_one_div ‖_‖]
apply Summable.mul_left
rwa [summable_one_div_int_add_rpow]
have := mellin_div_const .. ▸ hasSum_mellin_pi_mul_sq' (zero_lt_one.trans hs) hF h_sum
refine this.congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
simp only [r, c, mul_one_div, div_mul_eq_mul_div, div_right_comm]
/-!
## Non-completed zeta functions
-/
/-- The odd part of the Hurwitz zeta function, i.e. the meromorphic function of `s` which agrees
with `1 / 2 * ∑' (n : ℤ), sign (n + a) / |n + a| ^ s` for `1 < re s` -/
noncomputable def hurwitzZetaOdd (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :=
completedHurwitzZetaOdd a s / Gammaℝ (s + 1)
lemma hurwitzZetaOdd_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
hurwitzZetaOdd (-a) s = -hurwitzZetaOdd a s := by
simp_rw [hurwitzZetaOdd, completedHurwitzZetaOdd_neg, neg_div]
/-- The odd Hurwitz zeta function is differentiable everywhere. -/
lemma differentiable_hurwitzZetaOdd (a : UnitAddCircle) :
Differentiable ℂ (hurwitzZetaOdd a) :=
(differentiable_completedHurwitzZetaOdd a).mul <| differentiable_Gammaℝ_inv.comp <|
differentiable_id.add <| differentiable_const _
/-- The sine zeta function, i.e. the meromorphic function of `s` which agrees
with `∑' (n : ℕ), sin (2 * π * a * n) / n ^ s` for `1 < re s`. -/
noncomputable def sinZeta (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :=
completedSinZeta a s / Gammaℝ (s + 1)
lemma sinZeta_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (s : ℂ) :
sinZeta (-a) s = -sinZeta a s := by
simp_rw [sinZeta, completedSinZeta_neg, neg_div]
/-- The sine zeta function is differentiable everywhere. -/
lemma differentiableAt_sinZeta (a : UnitAddCircle) :
Differentiable ℂ (sinZeta a) :=
(differentiable_completedSinZeta a).mul <| differentiable_Gammaℝ_inv.comp <|
differentiable_id.add <| differentiable_const _
/-- Formula for `hurwitzZetaOdd` as a Dirichlet series in the convergence range (sum over `ℤ`). -/
theorem hasSum_int_hurwitzZetaOdd (a : ℝ) {s : ℂ} (hs : 1 < re s) :
HasSum (fun n : ℤ ↦ SignType.sign (n + a) / (↑|n + a| : ℂ) ^ s / 2) (hurwitzZetaOdd a s) := by
refine ((hasSum_int_completedHurwitzZetaOdd a hs).div_const (Gammaℝ _)).congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
have : 0 < re (s + 1) := by rw [add_re, one_re]; positivity
simp [div_right_comm _ _ (Gammaℝ _), mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (Gammaℝ_ne_zero_of_re_pos this)]
/-- Formula for `hurwitzZetaOdd` as a Dirichlet series in the convergence range, with sum over `ℕ`
(version with absolute values) -/
lemma hasSum_nat_hurwitzZetaOdd (a : ℝ) {s : ℂ} (hs : 1 < re s) :
HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ (SignType.sign (n + a) / (↑|n + a| : ℂ) ^ s
- SignType.sign (n + 1 - a) / (↑|n + 1 - a| : ℂ) ^ s) / 2) (hurwitzZetaOdd a s) := by
refine (hasSum_int_hurwitzZetaOdd a hs).nat_add_neg_add_one.congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
rw [Int.cast_neg, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one, sub_div, sub_eq_add_neg, Int.cast_natCast]
have : -(n + 1) + a = -(n + 1 - a) := by ring_nf
rw [this, Left.sign_neg, abs_neg, SignType.coe_neg, neg_div, neg_div]
/-- Formula for `hurwitzZetaOdd` as a Dirichlet series in the convergence range, with sum over `ℕ`
(version without absolute values, assuming `a ∈ Icc 0 1`) -/
lemma hasSum_nat_hurwitzZetaOdd_of_mem_Icc {a : ℝ} (ha : a ∈ Icc 0 1) {s : ℂ} (hs : 1 < re s) :
HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ (1 / (n + a : ℂ) ^ s - 1 / (n + 1 - a : ℂ) ^ s) / 2)
(hurwitzZetaOdd a s) := by
refine (hasSum_nat_hurwitzZetaOdd a hs).congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
suffices ∀ b : ℝ, 0 ≤ b → SignType.sign (n + b) / (↑|n + b| : ℂ) ^ s = 1 / (n + b) ^ s by
simp only [add_sub_assoc, this a ha.1, this (1 - a) (sub_nonneg.mpr ha.2), push_cast]
intro b hb
rw [abs_of_nonneg (by positivity), (by simp : (n : ℂ) + b = ↑(n + b))]
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le (by positivity : 0 ≤ n + b) with hb | hb
· simp [sign_pos hb]
· rw [← hb, ofReal_zero, zero_cpow ((not_lt.mpr zero_le_one) ∘ (zero_re ▸ · ▸ hs)),
div_zero, div_zero]
/-- Formula for `sinZeta` as a Dirichlet series in the convergence range, with sum over `ℤ`. -/
theorem hasSum_int_sinZeta (a : ℝ) {s : ℂ} (hs : 1 < re s) :
HasSum (fun n : ℤ ↦ -I * n.sign * cexp (2 * π * I * a * n) / ↑|n| ^ s / 2) (sinZeta a s) := by
rw [sinZeta]
refine ((hasSum_int_completedSinZeta a hs).div_const (Gammaℝ (s + 1))).congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
have : 0 < re (s + 1) := by rw [add_re, one_re]; positivity
simp only [mul_assoc, div_right_comm _ _ (Gammaℝ _),
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (Gammaℝ_ne_zero_of_re_pos this)]
/-- Formula for `sinZeta` as a Dirichlet series in the convergence range, with sum over `ℕ`. -/
lemma hasSum_nat_sinZeta (a : ℝ) {s : ℂ} (hs : 1 < re s) :
HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ Real.sin (2 * π * a * n) / (n : ℂ) ^ s) (sinZeta a s) := by
have := (hasSum_int_sinZeta a hs).nat_add_neg
simp_rw [abs_neg, Int.sign_neg, Int.cast_neg, Nat.abs_cast, Int.cast_natCast, mul_neg, abs_zero,
Int.cast_zero, zero_cpow (ne_zero_of_one_lt_re hs), div_zero, zero_div, add_zero] at this
simp_rw [push_cast, Complex.sin]
refine this.congr_fun fun n ↦ ?_
rcases ne_or_eq n 0 with h | rfl
· simp only [neg_mul, sub_mul, div_right_comm _ (2 : ℂ), Int.sign_natCast_of_ne_zero h,
Int.cast_one, mul_one, mul_comm I, neg_neg, ← add_div, ← sub_eq_neg_add]
congr 5 <;> ring
· simp
/-- Reformulation of `hasSum_nat_sinZeta` using `LSeriesHasSum`. -/
lemma LSeriesHasSum_sin (a : ℝ) {s : ℂ} (hs : 1 < re s) :
LSeriesHasSum (Real.sin <| 2 * π * a * ·) s (sinZeta a s) :=
(hasSum_nat_sinZeta a hs).congr_fun (LSeries.term_of_ne_zero' (ne_zero_of_one_lt_re hs) _)
/-- The trivial zeroes of the odd Hurwitz zeta function. -/
theorem hurwitzZetaOdd_neg_two_mul_nat_sub_one (a : UnitAddCircle) (n : ℕ) :
hurwitzZetaOdd a (-2 * n - 1) = 0 := by
rw [hurwitzZetaOdd, Gammaℝ_eq_zero_iff.mpr ⟨n, by rw [neg_mul, sub_add_cancel]⟩, div_zero]
/-- The trivial zeroes of the sine zeta function. -/
theorem sinZeta_neg_two_mul_nat_sub_one (a : UnitAddCircle) (n : ℕ) :
sinZeta a (-2 * n - 1) = 0 := by
rw [sinZeta, Gammaℝ_eq_zero_iff.mpr ⟨n, by rw [neg_mul, sub_add_cancel]⟩, div_zero]
/-- If `s` is not in `-ℕ`, then `hurwitzZetaOdd a (1 - s)` is an explicit multiple of
`sinZeta s`. -/
lemma hurwitzZetaOdd_one_sub (a : UnitAddCircle) {s : ℂ} (hs : ∀ (n : ℕ), s ≠ -n) :
hurwitzZetaOdd a (1 - s) = 2 * (2 * π) ^ (-s) * Gamma s * sin (π * s / 2) * sinZeta a s := by
rw [← Gammaℂ, hurwitzZetaOdd, (by ring : 1 - s + 1 = 2 - s), div_eq_mul_inv,
inv_Gammaℝ_two_sub hs, completedHurwitzZetaOdd_one_sub, sinZeta, ← div_eq_mul_inv,
← mul_div_assoc, ← mul_div_assoc, mul_comm]
/-- If `s` is not in `-ℕ`, then `sinZeta a (1 - s)` is an explicit multiple of
`hurwitzZetaOdd s`. -/
lemma sinZeta_one_sub (a : UnitAddCircle) {s : ℂ} (hs : ∀ (n : ℕ), s ≠ -n) :
sinZeta a (1 - s) = 2 * (2 * π) ^ (-s) * Gamma s * sin (π * s / 2) * hurwitzZetaOdd a s := by
rw [← Gammaℂ, sinZeta, (by ring : 1 - s + 1 = 2 - s), div_eq_mul_inv, inv_Gammaℝ_two_sub hs,
completedSinZeta_one_sub, hurwitzZetaOdd, ← div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_div_assoc, ← mul_div_assoc,
| mul_comm]
end HurwitzZeta
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LSeries/HurwitzZetaOdd.lean | 562 | 564 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Lattice
/-!
# Ordered Subtraction
This file proves lemmas relating (truncated) subtraction with an order. We provide a class
`OrderedSub` stating that `a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c + b`.
The subtraction discussed here could both be normal subtraction in an additive group or truncated
subtraction on a canonically ordered monoid (`ℕ`, `Multiset`, `PartENat`, `ENNReal`, ...)
## Implementation details
`OrderedSub` is a mixin type-class, so that we can use the results in this file even in cases
where we don't have a `CanonicallyOrderedAdd` instance
(even though that is our main focus). Conversely, this means we can use
`CanonicallyOrderedAdd` without necessarily having to define a subtraction.
The results in this file are ordered by the type-class assumption needed to prove it.
This means that similar results might not be close to each other. Furthermore, we don't prove
implications if a bi-implication can be proven under the same assumptions.
Lemmas using this class are named using `tsub` instead of `sub` (short for "truncated subtraction").
This is to avoid naming conflicts with similar lemmas about ordered groups.
We provide a second version of most results that require `[AddLeftReflectLE α]`. In the
second version we replace this type-class assumption by explicit `AddLECancellable` assumptions.
TODO: maybe we should make a multiplicative version of this, so that we can replace some identical
lemmas about subtraction/division in `Ordered[Add]CommGroup` with these.
TODO: generalize `Nat.le_of_le_of_sub_le_sub_right`, `Nat.sub_le_sub_right_iff`,
`Nat.mul_self_sub_mul_self_eq`
-/
variable {α : Type*}
/-- `OrderedSub α` means that `α` has a subtraction characterized by `a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c + b`.
In other words, `a - b` is the least `c` such that `a ≤ b + c`.
This is satisfied both by the subtraction in additive ordered groups and by truncated subtraction
in canonically ordered monoids on many specific types.
-/
class OrderedSub (α : Type*) [LE α] [Add α] [Sub α] : Prop where
/-- `a - b` provides a lower bound on `c` such that `a ≤ c + b`. -/
tsub_le_iff_right : ∀ a b c : α, a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c + b
section Add
@[simp]
theorem tsub_le_iff_right [LE α] [Add α] [Sub α] [OrderedSub α] {a b c : α} :
a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c + b :=
OrderedSub.tsub_le_iff_right a b c
variable [Preorder α] [Add α] [Sub α] [OrderedSub α] {a b : α}
/-- See `add_tsub_cancel_right` for the equality if `AddLeftReflectLE α`. -/
theorem add_tsub_le_right : a + b - b ≤ a :=
tsub_le_iff_right.mpr le_rfl
theorem le_tsub_add : b ≤ b - a + a :=
tsub_le_iff_right.mp le_rfl
end Add
/-! ### Preorder -/
section OrderedAddCommSemigroup
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
section AddCommSemigroup
variable [AddCommSemigroup α] [Sub α] [OrderedSub α] {a b c d : α}
/- TODO: Most results can be generalized to [Add α] [@Std.Commutative α (· + ·)] -/
theorem tsub_le_iff_left : a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b + c := by rw [tsub_le_iff_right, add_comm]
theorem le_add_tsub : a ≤ b + (a - b) :=
tsub_le_iff_left.mp le_rfl
/-- See `add_tsub_cancel_left` for the equality if `AddLeftReflectLE α`. -/
theorem add_tsub_le_left : a + b - a ≤ b :=
tsub_le_iff_left.mpr le_rfl
@[gcongr] theorem tsub_le_tsub_right (h : a ≤ b) (c : α) : a - c ≤ b - c :=
tsub_le_iff_left.mpr <| h.trans le_add_tsub
theorem tsub_le_iff_tsub_le : a - b ≤ c ↔ a - c ≤ b := by rw [tsub_le_iff_left, tsub_le_iff_right]
/-- See `tsub_tsub_cancel_of_le` for the equality. -/
theorem tsub_tsub_le : b - (b - a) ≤ a :=
tsub_le_iff_right.mpr le_add_tsub
section Cov
variable [AddLeftMono α]
@[gcongr] theorem tsub_le_tsub_left (h : a ≤ b) (c : α) : c - b ≤ c - a :=
tsub_le_iff_left.mpr <| le_add_tsub.trans <| add_le_add_right h _
@[gcongr] theorem tsub_le_tsub (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : a - d ≤ b - c :=
(tsub_le_tsub_right hab _).trans <| tsub_le_tsub_left hcd _
theorem antitone_const_tsub : Antitone fun x => c - x := fun _ _ hxy => tsub_le_tsub rfl.le hxy
/-- See `add_tsub_assoc_of_le` for the equality. -/
theorem add_tsub_le_assoc : a + b - c ≤ a + (b - c) := by
rw [tsub_le_iff_left, add_left_comm]
exact add_le_add_left le_add_tsub a
/-- See `tsub_add_eq_add_tsub` for the equality. -/
theorem add_tsub_le_tsub_add : a + b - c ≤ a - c + b := by
rw [add_comm, add_comm _ b]
exact add_tsub_le_assoc
theorem add_le_add_add_tsub : a + b ≤ a + c + (b - c) := by
rw [add_assoc]
exact add_le_add_left le_add_tsub a
theorem le_tsub_add_add : a + b ≤ a - c + (b + c) := by
rw [add_comm a, add_comm (a - c)]
exact add_le_add_add_tsub
theorem tsub_le_tsub_add_tsub : a - c ≤ a - b + (b - c) := by
rw [tsub_le_iff_left, ← add_assoc, add_right_comm]
exact le_add_tsub.trans (add_le_add_right le_add_tsub _)
theorem tsub_tsub_tsub_le_tsub : c - a - (c - b) ≤ b - a := by
rw [tsub_le_iff_left, tsub_le_iff_left, add_left_comm]
exact le_tsub_add.trans (add_le_add_left le_add_tsub _)
theorem tsub_tsub_le_tsub_add {a b c : α} : a - (b - c) ≤ a - b + c :=
tsub_le_iff_right.2 <|
calc
a ≤ a - b + b := le_tsub_add
_ ≤ a - b + (c + (b - c)) := add_le_add_left le_add_tsub _
_ = a - b + c + (b - c) := (add_assoc _ _ _).symm
|
/-- See `tsub_add_tsub_comm` for the equality. -/
theorem add_tsub_add_le_tsub_add_tsub : a + b - (c + d) ≤ a - c + (b - d) := by
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Sub/Defs.lean | 150 | 152 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Josha Dekker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Josha Dekker
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Cofinite
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.CountableInter
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.CardinalInter
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Arithmetic
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Cofinality
/-!
# The cocardinal filter
In this file we define `Filter.cocardinal hc`: the filter of sets with cardinality less than
a regular cardinal `c` that satisfies `Cardinal.aleph0 < c`.
Such filters are `CardinalInterFilter` with cardinality `c`.
-/
open Set Filter Cardinal
universe u
variable {α : Type u} {c : Cardinal.{u}} {hreg : c.IsRegular}
namespace Filter
variable (α) in
/-- The filter defined by all sets that have a complement with at most cardinality `c`. For a union
of `c` sets of `c` elements to have `c` elements, we need that `c` is a regular cardinal. -/
def cocardinal (hreg : c.IsRegular) : Filter α := by
apply ofCardinalUnion {s | Cardinal.mk s < c} (lt_of_lt_of_le (nat_lt_aleph0 2) hreg.aleph0_le)
· refine fun s hS hSc ↦ lt_of_le_of_lt (mk_sUnion_le _) <| mul_lt_of_lt hreg.aleph0_le hS ?_
exact iSup_lt_of_isRegular hreg hS fun i ↦ hSc i i.property
· exact fun _ hSc _ ht ↦ lt_of_le_of_lt (mk_le_mk_of_subset ht) hSc
@[simp]
theorem mem_cocardinal {s : Set α} :
s ∈ cocardinal α hreg ↔ Cardinal.mk (sᶜ : Set α) < c := Iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma cocardinal_aleph0_eq_cofinite :
cocardinal (α := α) isRegular_aleph0 = cofinite := by
aesop
instance instCardinalInterFilter_cocardinal : CardinalInterFilter (cocardinal (α := α) hreg) c where
cardinal_sInter_mem S hS hSs := by
rw [mem_cocardinal, Set.compl_sInter]
apply lt_of_le_of_lt (mk_sUnion_le _)
apply mul_lt_of_lt hreg.aleph0_le (lt_of_le_of_lt mk_image_le hS)
apply iSup_lt_of_isRegular hreg <| lt_of_le_of_lt mk_image_le hS
aesop
@[simp]
theorem eventually_cocardinal {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in cocardinal α hreg, p x) ↔ #{ x | ¬p x } < c := Iff.rfl
theorem hasBasis_cocardinal : HasBasis (cocardinal α hreg) {s : Set α | #s < c} compl :=
⟨fun s =>
⟨fun h => ⟨sᶜ, h, (compl_compl s).subset⟩, fun ⟨_t, htf, hts⟩ => by
have : #↑sᶜ < c := by
apply lt_of_le_of_lt _ htf
rw [compl_subset_comm] at hts
apply Cardinal.mk_le_mk_of_subset hts
simp_all only [mem_cocardinal] ⟩⟩
theorem frequently_cocardinal {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in cocardinal α hreg, p x) ↔ c ≤ # { x | p x } := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_cocardinal, not_not,coe_setOf, not_lt]
lemma frequently_cocardinal_mem {s : Set α} :
(∃ᶠ x in cocardinal α hreg, x ∈ s) ↔ c ≤ #s := frequently_cocardinal
@[simp]
lemma cocardinal_inf_principal_neBot_iff {s : Set α} :
(cocardinal α hreg ⊓ 𝓟 s).NeBot ↔ c ≤ #s :=
frequently_mem_iff_neBot.symm.trans frequently_cocardinal
theorem compl_mem_cocardinal_of_card_lt {s : Set α} (hs : #s < c) :
sᶜ ∈ cocardinal α hreg :=
mem_cocardinal.2 <| (compl_compl s).symm ▸ hs
theorem _root_.Set.Finite.compl_mem_cocardinal {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) :
sᶜ ∈ cocardinal α hreg :=
compl_mem_cocardinal_of_card_lt <| lt_of_lt_of_le (Finite.lt_aleph0 hs) (hreg.aleph0_le)
theorem eventually_cocardinal_nmem_of_card_lt {s : Set α} (hs : #s < c) :
∀ᶠ x in cocardinal α hreg, x ∉ s :=
compl_mem_cocardinal_of_card_lt hs
theorem _root_.Finset.eventually_cocardinal_nmem (s : Finset α) :
∀ᶠ x in cocardinal α hreg, x ∉ s :=
eventually_cocardinal_nmem_of_card_lt <| lt_of_lt_of_le (finset_card_lt_aleph0 s) (hreg.aleph0_le)
theorem eventually_cocardinal_ne (x : α) : ∀ᶠ a in cocardinal α hreg, a ≠ x := by
simpa [Set.finite_singleton x] using hreg.nat_lt 1
/-- The filter defined by all sets that have countable complements. -/
| abbrev cocountable : Filter α := cocardinal α Cardinal.isRegular_aleph_one
theorem mem_cocountable {s : Set α} :
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Cocardinal.lean | 98 | 100 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Raghuram Sundararajan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Raghuram Sundararajan
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Ext
/-!
# Extensionality lemmas for rings and similar structures
In this file we prove extensionality lemmas for the ring-like structures defined in
`Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/Defs.lean`, ranging from `NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring` to `CommRing`. These
extensionality lemmas take the form of asserting that two algebraic structures on a type are equal
whenever the addition and multiplication defined by them are both the same.
## Implementation details
We follow `Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Ext.lean` in using the term `(letI := i; HMul.hMul : R → R → R)` to
refer to the multiplication specified by a typeclass instance `i` on a type `R` (and similarly for
addition). We abbreviate these using some local notations.
Since `Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Ext.lean` proved several injectivity lemmas, we do so as well — even if
sometimes we don't need them to prove extensionality.
## Tags
semiring, ring, extensionality
-/
local macro:max "local_hAdd[" type:term ", " inst:term "]" : term =>
`(term| (letI := $inst; HAdd.hAdd : $type → $type → $type))
local macro:max "local_hMul[" type:term ", " inst:term "]" : term =>
`(term| (letI := $inst; HMul.hMul : $type → $type → $type))
universe u
variable {R : Type u}
/-! ### Distrib -/
namespace Distrib
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : Distrib R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
-- Split into `add` and `mul` functions and properties.
rcases inst₁ with @⟨⟨⟩, ⟨⟩⟩
rcases inst₂ with @⟨⟨⟩, ⟨⟩⟩
-- Prove equality of parts using function extensionality.
congr
end Distrib
/-! ### NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring -/
namespace NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
-- Split into `AddMonoid` instance, `mul` function and properties.
rcases inst₁ with @⟨_, ⟨⟩⟩
rcases inst₂ with @⟨_, ⟨⟩⟩
-- Prove equality of parts using already-proved extensionality lemmas.
congr; ext : 1; assumption
theorem toDistrib_injective : Function.Injective (@toDistrib R) := by
intro _ _ h
ext x y
· exact congrArg (·.toAdd.add x y) h
· exact congrArg (·.toMul.mul x y) h
end NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
/-! ### NonUnitalSemiring -/
namespace NonUnitalSemiring
theorem toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R) := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ _; congr
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : NonUnitalSemiring R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ :=
toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring_injective <|
NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring.ext h_add h_mul
end NonUnitalSemiring
/-! ### NonAssocSemiring and its ancestors
This section also includes results for `AddMonoidWithOne`, `AddCommMonoidWithOne`, etc.
as these are considered implementation detail of the ring classes.
TODO consider relocating these lemmas.
-/
/- TODO consider relocating these lemmas. -/
@[ext] theorem AddMonoidWithOne.ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : AddMonoidWithOne R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_one : (letI := inst₁; One.one : R) = (letI := inst₂; One.one : R)) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
have h_monoid : inst₁.toAddMonoid = inst₂.toAddMonoid := by ext : 1; exact h_add
have h_zero' : inst₁.toZero = inst₂.toZero := congrArg (·.toZero) h_monoid
have h_one' : inst₁.toOne = inst₂.toOne :=
congrArg One.mk h_one
have h_natCast : inst₁.toNatCast.natCast = inst₂.toNatCast.natCast := by
funext n; induction n with
| zero => rewrite [inst₁.natCast_zero, inst₂.natCast_zero]
exact congrArg (@Zero.zero R) h_zero'
| succ n h => rw [inst₁.natCast_succ, inst₂.natCast_succ, h_add]
exact congrArg₂ _ h h_one
rcases inst₁ with @⟨⟨⟩⟩; rcases inst₂ with @⟨⟨⟩⟩
congr
theorem AddCommMonoidWithOne.toAddMonoidWithOne_injective :
Function.Injective (@AddCommMonoidWithOne.toAddMonoidWithOne R) := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ _; congr
@[ext] theorem AddCommMonoidWithOne.ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : AddCommMonoidWithOne R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_one : (letI := inst₁; One.one : R) = (letI := inst₂; One.one : R)) :
inst₁ = inst₂ :=
AddCommMonoidWithOne.toAddMonoidWithOne_injective <|
AddMonoidWithOne.ext h_add h_one
namespace NonAssocSemiring
/- The best place to prove that the `NatCast` is determined by the other operations is probably in
an extensionality lemma for `AddMonoidWithOne`, in which case we may as well do the typeclasses
defined in `Mathlib/Algebra/GroupWithZero/Defs.lean` as well. -/
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : NonAssocSemiring R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
have h : inst₁.toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring = inst₂.toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring := by
ext : 1 <;> assumption
have h_zero : (inst₁.toMulZeroClass).toZero.zero = (inst₂.toMulZeroClass).toZero.zero :=
congrArg (fun inst => (inst.toMulZeroClass).toZero.zero) h
have h_one' : (inst₁.toMulZeroOneClass).toMulOneClass.toOne
= (inst₂.toMulZeroOneClass).toMulOneClass.toOne :=
congrArg (@MulOneClass.toOne R) <| by ext : 1; exact h_mul
have h_one : (inst₁.toMulZeroOneClass).toMulOneClass.toOne.one
= (inst₂.toMulZeroOneClass).toMulOneClass.toOne.one :=
congrArg (@One.one R) h_one'
have : inst₁.toAddCommMonoidWithOne = inst₂.toAddCommMonoidWithOne := by
ext : 1 <;> assumption
have : inst₁.toNatCast = inst₂.toNatCast :=
congrArg (·.toNatCast) this
-- Split into `NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring`, `One` and `natCast` instances.
cases inst₁; cases inst₂
congr
theorem toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R) := by
intro _ _ _
ext <;> congr
end NonAssocSemiring
/-! ### NonUnitalNonAssocRing -/
namespace NonUnitalNonAssocRing
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : NonUnitalNonAssocRing R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
-- Split into `AddCommGroup` instance, `mul` function and properties.
rcases inst₁ with @⟨_, ⟨⟩⟩; rcases inst₂ with @⟨_, ⟨⟩⟩
congr; (ext : 1; assumption)
theorem toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R) := by
intro _ _ h
-- Use above extensionality lemma to prove injectivity by showing that `h_add` and `h_mul` hold.
ext x y
· exact congrArg (·.toAdd.add x y) h
· exact congrArg (·.toMul.mul x y) h
end NonUnitalNonAssocRing
/-! ### NonUnitalRing -/
namespace NonUnitalRing
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : NonUnitalRing R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
have : inst₁.toNonUnitalNonAssocRing = inst₂.toNonUnitalNonAssocRing := by
ext : 1 <;> assumption
-- Split into fields and prove they are equal using the above.
cases inst₁; cases inst₂
congr
theorem toNonUnitalSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalSemiring R) := by
intro _ _ h
ext x y
· exact congrArg (·.toAdd.add x y) h
· exact congrArg (·.toMul.mul x y) h
theorem toNonUnitalNonAssocring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalNonAssocRing R) := by
intro _ _ _
ext <;> congr
end NonUnitalRing
/-! ### NonAssocRing and its ancestors
This section also includes results for `AddGroupWithOne`, `AddCommGroupWithOne`, etc.
as these are considered implementation detail of the ring classes.
TODO consider relocating these lemmas. -/
@[ext] theorem AddGroupWithOne.ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : AddGroupWithOne R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_one : (letI := inst₁; One.one : R) = (letI := inst₂; One.one)) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
have : inst₁.toAddMonoidWithOne = inst₂.toAddMonoidWithOne :=
AddMonoidWithOne.ext h_add h_one
have : inst₁.toNatCast = inst₂.toNatCast := congrArg (·.toNatCast) this
have h_group : inst₁.toAddGroup = inst₂.toAddGroup := by ext : 1; exact h_add
-- Extract equality of necessary substructures from h_group
injection h_group with h_group; injection h_group
have : inst₁.toIntCast.intCast = inst₂.toIntCast.intCast := by
funext n; cases n with
| ofNat n => rewrite [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, inst₁.intCast_ofNat, inst₂.intCast_ofNat]; congr
| negSucc n => rewrite [inst₁.intCast_negSucc, inst₂.intCast_negSucc]; congr
rcases inst₁ with @⟨⟨⟩⟩; rcases inst₂ with @⟨⟨⟩⟩
congr
@[ext] theorem AddCommGroupWithOne.ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : AddCommGroupWithOne R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_one : (letI := inst₁; One.one : R) = (letI := inst₂; One.one)) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
have : inst₁.toAddCommGroup = inst₂.toAddCommGroup :=
AddCommGroup.ext h_add
have : inst₁.toAddGroupWithOne = inst₂.toAddGroupWithOne :=
AddGroupWithOne.ext h_add h_one
injection this with _ h_addMonoidWithOne; injection h_addMonoidWithOne
cases inst₁; cases inst₂
congr
namespace NonAssocRing
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : NonAssocRing R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
have h₁ : inst₁.toNonUnitalNonAssocRing = inst₂.toNonUnitalNonAssocRing := by
ext : 1 <;> assumption
have h₂ : inst₁.toNonAssocSemiring = inst₂.toNonAssocSemiring := by
ext : 1 <;> assumption
-- Mathematically non-trivial fact: `intCast` is determined by the rest.
have h₃ : inst₁.toAddCommGroupWithOne = inst₂.toAddCommGroupWithOne :=
AddCommGroupWithOne.ext h_add (congrArg (·.toOne.one) h₂)
cases inst₁; cases inst₂
congr <;> solve| injection h₁ | injection h₂ | injection h₃
theorem toNonAssocSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonAssocSemiring R) := by
intro _ _ h
ext x y
· exact congrArg (·.toAdd.add x y) h
· exact congrArg (·.toMul.mul x y) h
theorem toNonUnitalNonAssocring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalNonAssocRing R) := by
intro _ _ _
ext <;> congr
end NonAssocRing
/-! ### Semiring -/
namespace Semiring
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : Semiring R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
-- Show that enough substructures are equal.
have h₁ : inst₁.toNonUnitalSemiring = inst₂.toNonUnitalSemiring := by
ext : 1 <;> assumption
have h₂ : inst₁.toNonAssocSemiring = inst₂.toNonAssocSemiring := by
ext : 1 <;> assumption
have h₃ : (inst₁.toMonoidWithZero).toMonoid = (inst₂.toMonoidWithZero).toMonoid := by
ext : 1; exact h_mul
-- Split into fields and prove they are equal using the above.
cases inst₁; cases inst₂
congr <;> solve| injection h₁ | injection h₂ | injection h₃
theorem toNonUnitalSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalSemiring R) := by
intro _ _ h
ext x y
· exact congrArg (·.toAdd.add x y) h
· exact congrArg (·.toMul.mul x y) h
theorem toNonAssocSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonAssocSemiring R) := by
intro _ _ h
ext x y
· exact congrArg (·.toAdd.add x y) h
· exact congrArg (·.toMul.mul x y) h
end Semiring
/-! ### Ring -/
namespace Ring
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : Ring R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
-- Show that enough substructures are equal.
have h₁ : inst₁.toSemiring = inst₂.toSemiring := by
ext : 1 <;> assumption
have h₂ : inst₁.toNonAssocRing = inst₂.toNonAssocRing := by
ext : 1 <;> assumption
/- We prove that the `SubNegMonoid`s are equal because they are one
field away from `Sub` and `Neg`, enabling use of `injection`. -/
have h₃ : (inst₁.toAddCommGroup).toAddGroup.toSubNegMonoid
= (inst₂.toAddCommGroup).toAddGroup.toSubNegMonoid :=
congrArg (@AddGroup.toSubNegMonoid R) <| by ext : 1; exact h_add
-- Split into fields and prove they are equal using the above.
cases inst₁; cases inst₂
congr <;> solve | injection h₂ | injection h₃
theorem toNonUnitalRing_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalRing R) := by
intro _ _ h
ext x y
· exact congrArg (·.toAdd.add x y) h
· exact congrArg (·.toMul.mul x y) h
theorem toNonAssocRing_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonAssocRing R) := by
intro _ _ _
ext <;> congr
theorem toSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toSemiring R) := by
intro _ _ h
ext x y
· exact congrArg (·.toAdd.add x y) h
· exact congrArg (·.toMul.mul x y) h
end Ring
/-! ### NonUnitalNonAssocCommSemiring -/
namespace NonUnitalNonAssocCommSemiring
theorem toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R) := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ _; congr
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : NonUnitalNonAssocCommSemiring R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ :=
toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring_injective <|
NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring.ext h_add h_mul
end NonUnitalNonAssocCommSemiring
/-! ### NonUnitalCommSemiring -/
namespace NonUnitalCommSemiring
theorem toNonUnitalSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalSemiring R) := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ _; congr
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : NonUnitalCommSemiring R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ :=
toNonUnitalSemiring_injective <|
NonUnitalSemiring.ext h_add h_mul
end NonUnitalCommSemiring
-- At present, there is no `NonAssocCommSemiring` in Mathlib.
/-! ### NonUnitalNonAssocCommRing -/
namespace NonUnitalNonAssocCommRing
theorem toNonUnitalNonAssocRing_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalNonAssocRing R) := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ _; congr
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : NonUnitalNonAssocCommRing R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ :=
toNonUnitalNonAssocRing_injective <|
NonUnitalNonAssocRing.ext h_add h_mul
end NonUnitalNonAssocCommRing
/-! ### NonUnitalCommRing -/
namespace NonUnitalCommRing
theorem toNonUnitalRing_injective :
Function.Injective (@toNonUnitalRing R) := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ _; congr
@[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : NonUnitalCommRing R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ :=
toNonUnitalRing_injective <|
NonUnitalRing.ext h_add h_mul
end NonUnitalCommRing
-- At present, there is no `NonAssocCommRing` in Mathlib.
| /-! ### CommSemiring -/
namespace CommSemiring
theorem toSemiring_injective :
Function.Injective (@toSemiring R) := by
| Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/Ext.lean | 416 | 420 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.NAry
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Slice
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Sups
/-!
# Set family operations
This file defines a few binary operations on `Finset α` for use in set family combinatorics.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.sups s t`: Finset of elements of the form `a ⊔ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`.
* `Finset.infs s t`: Finset of elements of the form `a ⊓ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`.
* `Finset.disjSups s t`: Finset of elements of the form `a ⊔ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t` and `a`
and `b` are disjoint.
* `Finset.diffs`: Finset of elements of the form `a \ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`.
* `Finset.compls`: Finset of elements of the form `aᶜ` where `a ∈ s`.
## Notation
We define the following notation in locale `FinsetFamily`:
* `s ⊻ t` for `Finset.sups`
* `s ⊼ t` for `Finset.infs`
* `s ○ t` for `Finset.disjSups s t`
* `s \\ t` for `Finset.diffs`
* `sᶜˢ` for `Finset.compls`
## References
[B. Bollobás, *Combinatorics*][bollobas1986]
-/
open Function
open SetFamily
variable {F α β : Type*}
namespace Finset
section Sups
variable [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β]
variable [SemilatticeSup α] [SemilatticeSup β] [FunLike F α β] [SupHomClass F α β]
variable (s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u v : Finset α)
/-- `s ⊻ t` is the finset of elements of the form `a ⊔ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`. -/
protected def hasSups : HasSups (Finset α) :=
⟨image₂ (· ⊔ ·)⟩
scoped[FinsetFamily] attribute [instance] Finset.hasSups
open FinsetFamily
variable {s t} {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem mem_sups : c ∈ s ⊻ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, ∃ b ∈ t, a ⊔ b = c := by simp [(· ⊻ ·)]
variable (s t)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sups : (↑(s ⊻ t) : Set α) = ↑s ⊻ ↑t :=
coe_image₂ _ _ _
theorem card_sups_le : #(s ⊻ t) ≤ #s * #t := card_image₂_le _ _ _
theorem card_sups_iff : #(s ⊻ t) = #s * #t ↔ (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × α)).InjOn fun x => x.1 ⊔ x.2 :=
card_image₂_iff
variable {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u}
theorem sup_mem_sups : a ∈ s → b ∈ t → a ⊔ b ∈ s ⊻ t :=
mem_image₂_of_mem
theorem sups_subset : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s₁ ⊻ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ⊻ t₂ :=
image₂_subset
theorem sups_subset_left : t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s ⊻ t₁ ⊆ s ⊻ t₂ :=
image₂_subset_left
theorem sups_subset_right : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₁ ⊻ t ⊆ s₂ ⊻ t :=
image₂_subset_right
lemma image_subset_sups_left : b ∈ t → s.image (· ⊔ b) ⊆ s ⊻ t := image_subset_image₂_left
lemma image_subset_sups_right : a ∈ s → t.image (a ⊔ ·) ⊆ s ⊻ t := image_subset_image₂_right
theorem forall_sups_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∀ c ∈ s ⊻ t, p c) ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, p (a ⊔ b) :=
forall_mem_image₂
@[simp]
theorem sups_subset_iff : s ⊻ t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, a ⊔ b ∈ u :=
image₂_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem sups_nonempty : (s ⊻ t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty :=
image₂_nonempty_iff
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected theorem Nonempty.sups : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty → (s ⊻ t).Nonempty :=
Nonempty.image₂
theorem Nonempty.of_sups_left : (s ⊻ t).Nonempty → s.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_image₂_left
theorem Nonempty.of_sups_right : (s ⊻ t).Nonempty → t.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_image₂_right
@[simp]
theorem empty_sups : ∅ ⊻ t = ∅ :=
image₂_empty_left
@[simp]
theorem sups_empty : s ⊻ ∅ = ∅ :=
image₂_empty_right
@[simp]
theorem sups_eq_empty : s ⊻ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ :=
image₂_eq_empty_iff
@[simp] lemma singleton_sups : {a} ⊻ t = t.image (a ⊔ ·) := image₂_singleton_left
@[simp] lemma sups_singleton : s ⊻ {b} = s.image (· ⊔ b) := image₂_singleton_right
theorem singleton_sups_singleton : ({a} ⊻ {b} : Finset α) = {a ⊔ b} :=
image₂_singleton
theorem sups_union_left : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ⊻ t = s₁ ⊻ t ∪ s₂ ⊻ t :=
image₂_union_left
theorem sups_union_right : s ⊻ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s ⊻ t₁ ∪ s ⊻ t₂ :=
image₂_union_right
theorem sups_inter_subset_left : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ⊻ t ⊆ s₁ ⊻ t ∩ s₂ ⊻ t :=
image₂_inter_subset_left
theorem sups_inter_subset_right : s ⊻ (t₁ ∩ t₂) ⊆ s ⊻ t₁ ∩ s ⊻ t₂ :=
image₂_inter_subset_right
theorem subset_sups {s t : Set α} :
↑u ⊆ s ⊻ t → ∃ s' t' : Finset α, ↑s' ⊆ s ∧ ↑t' ⊆ t ∧ u ⊆ s' ⊻ t' :=
subset_set_image₂
lemma image_sups (f : F) (s t : Finset α) : image f (s ⊻ t) = image f s ⊻ image f t :=
image_image₂_distrib <| map_sup f
lemma map_sups (f : F) (hf) (s t : Finset α) :
map ⟨f, hf⟩ (s ⊻ t) = map ⟨f, hf⟩ s ⊻ map ⟨f, hf⟩ t := by
simpa [map_eq_image] using image_sups f s t
lemma subset_sups_self : s ⊆ s ⊻ s := fun _a ha ↦ mem_sups.2 ⟨_, ha, _, ha, sup_idem _⟩
lemma sups_subset_self : s ⊻ s ⊆ s ↔ SupClosed (s : Set α) := sups_subset_iff
@[simp] lemma sups_eq_self : s ⊻ s = s ↔ SupClosed (s : Set α) := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp] lemma univ_sups_univ [Fintype α] : (univ : Finset α) ⊻ univ = univ := by simp
lemma filter_sups_le [DecidableLE α] (s t : Finset α) (a : α) :
{b ∈ s ⊻ t | b ≤ a} = {b ∈ s | b ≤ a} ⊻ {b ∈ t | b ≤ a} := by
simp only [← coe_inj, coe_filter, coe_sups, ← mem_coe, Set.sep_sups_le]
variable (s t u)
lemma biUnion_image_sup_left : s.biUnion (fun a ↦ t.image (a ⊔ ·)) = s ⊻ t := biUnion_image_left
lemma biUnion_image_sup_right : t.biUnion (fun b ↦ s.image (· ⊔ b)) = s ⊻ t := biUnion_image_right
theorem image_sup_product (s t : Finset α) : (s ×ˢ t).image (uncurry (· ⊔ ·)) = s ⊻ t :=
image_uncurry_product _ _ _
theorem sups_assoc : s ⊻ t ⊻ u = s ⊻ (t ⊻ u) := image₂_assoc sup_assoc
theorem sups_comm : s ⊻ t = t ⊻ s := image₂_comm sup_comm
theorem sups_left_comm : s ⊻ (t ⊻ u) = t ⊻ (s ⊻ u) :=
image₂_left_comm sup_left_comm
theorem sups_right_comm : s ⊻ t ⊻ u = s ⊻ u ⊻ t :=
image₂_right_comm sup_right_comm
theorem sups_sups_sups_comm : s ⊻ t ⊻ (u ⊻ v) = s ⊻ u ⊻ (t ⊻ v) :=
image₂_image₂_image₂_comm sup_sup_sup_comm
end Sups
section Infs
variable [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β]
variable [SemilatticeInf α] [SemilatticeInf β] [FunLike F α β] [InfHomClass F α β]
variable (s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u v : Finset α)
/-- `s ⊼ t` is the finset of elements of the form `a ⊓ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`. -/
protected def hasInfs : HasInfs (Finset α) :=
⟨image₂ (· ⊓ ·)⟩
scoped[FinsetFamily] attribute [instance] Finset.hasInfs
open FinsetFamily
variable {s t} {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem mem_infs : c ∈ s ⊼ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, ∃ b ∈ t, a ⊓ b = c := by simp [(· ⊼ ·)]
variable (s t)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_infs : (↑(s ⊼ t) : Set α) = ↑s ⊼ ↑t :=
coe_image₂ _ _ _
theorem card_infs_le : #(s ⊼ t) ≤ #s * #t := card_image₂_le _ _ _
theorem card_infs_iff : #(s ⊼ t) = #s * #t ↔ (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × α)).InjOn fun x => x.1 ⊓ x.2 :=
card_image₂_iff
variable {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u}
theorem inf_mem_infs : a ∈ s → b ∈ t → a ⊓ b ∈ s ⊼ t :=
mem_image₂_of_mem
theorem infs_subset : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s₁ ⊼ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ⊼ t₂ :=
image₂_subset
theorem infs_subset_left : t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s ⊼ t₁ ⊆ s ⊼ t₂ :=
image₂_subset_left
theorem infs_subset_right : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₁ ⊼ t ⊆ s₂ ⊼ t :=
image₂_subset_right
lemma image_subset_infs_left : b ∈ t → s.image (· ⊓ b) ⊆ s ⊼ t := image_subset_image₂_left
lemma image_subset_infs_right : a ∈ s → t.image (a ⊓ ·) ⊆ s ⊼ t := image_subset_image₂_right
theorem forall_infs_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∀ c ∈ s ⊼ t, p c) ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, p (a ⊓ b) :=
forall_mem_image₂
@[simp]
theorem infs_subset_iff : s ⊼ t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, a ⊓ b ∈ u :=
image₂_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem infs_nonempty : (s ⊼ t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty :=
image₂_nonempty_iff
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected theorem Nonempty.infs : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty → (s ⊼ t).Nonempty :=
Nonempty.image₂
theorem Nonempty.of_infs_left : (s ⊼ t).Nonempty → s.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_image₂_left
theorem Nonempty.of_infs_right : (s ⊼ t).Nonempty → t.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_image₂_right
@[simp]
theorem empty_infs : ∅ ⊼ t = ∅ :=
image₂_empty_left
@[simp]
theorem infs_empty : s ⊼ ∅ = ∅ :=
image₂_empty_right
@[simp]
theorem infs_eq_empty : s ⊼ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ :=
image₂_eq_empty_iff
@[simp] lemma singleton_infs : {a} ⊼ t = t.image (a ⊓ ·) := image₂_singleton_left
@[simp] lemma infs_singleton : s ⊼ {b} = s.image (· ⊓ b) := image₂_singleton_right
theorem singleton_infs_singleton : ({a} ⊼ {b} : Finset α) = {a ⊓ b} :=
image₂_singleton
theorem infs_union_left : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ⊼ t = s₁ ⊼ t ∪ s₂ ⊼ t :=
image₂_union_left
theorem infs_union_right : s ⊼ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s ⊼ t₁ ∪ s ⊼ t₂ :=
image₂_union_right
theorem infs_inter_subset_left : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ⊼ t ⊆ s₁ ⊼ t ∩ s₂ ⊼ t :=
image₂_inter_subset_left
theorem infs_inter_subset_right : s ⊼ (t₁ ∩ t₂) ⊆ s ⊼ t₁ ∩ s ⊼ t₂ :=
image₂_inter_subset_right
theorem subset_infs {s t : Set α} :
↑u ⊆ s ⊼ t → ∃ s' t' : Finset α, ↑s' ⊆ s ∧ ↑t' ⊆ t ∧ u ⊆ s' ⊼ t' :=
subset_set_image₂
lemma image_infs (f : F) (s t : Finset α) : image f (s ⊼ t) = image f s ⊼ image f t :=
image_image₂_distrib <| map_inf f
lemma map_infs (f : F) (hf) (s t : Finset α) :
map ⟨f, hf⟩ (s ⊼ t) = map ⟨f, hf⟩ s ⊼ map ⟨f, hf⟩ t := by
simpa [map_eq_image] using image_infs f s t
lemma subset_infs_self : s ⊆ s ⊼ s := fun _a ha ↦ mem_infs.2 ⟨_, ha, _, ha, inf_idem _⟩
lemma infs_self_subset : s ⊼ s ⊆ s ↔ InfClosed (s : Set α) := infs_subset_iff
@[simp] lemma infs_self : s ⊼ s = s ↔ InfClosed (s : Set α) := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp] lemma univ_infs_univ [Fintype α] : (univ : Finset α) ⊼ univ = univ := by simp
lemma filter_infs_le [DecidableLE α] (s t : Finset α) (a : α) :
{b ∈ s ⊼ t | a ≤ b} = {b ∈ s | a ≤ b} ⊼ {b ∈ t | a ≤ b} := by
simp only [← coe_inj, coe_filter, coe_infs, ← mem_coe, Set.sep_infs_le]
variable (s t u)
lemma biUnion_image_inf_left : s.biUnion (fun a ↦ t.image (a ⊓ ·)) = s ⊼ t := biUnion_image_left
lemma biUnion_image_inf_right : t.biUnion (fun b ↦ s.image (· ⊓ b)) = s ⊼ t := biUnion_image_right
theorem image_inf_product (s t : Finset α) : (s ×ˢ t).image (uncurry (· ⊓ ·)) = s ⊼ t :=
image_uncurry_product _ _ _
theorem infs_assoc : s ⊼ t ⊼ u = s ⊼ (t ⊼ u) := image₂_assoc inf_assoc
theorem infs_comm : s ⊼ t = t ⊼ s := image₂_comm inf_comm
theorem infs_left_comm : s ⊼ (t ⊼ u) = t ⊼ (s ⊼ u) :=
image₂_left_comm inf_left_comm
theorem infs_right_comm : s ⊼ t ⊼ u = s ⊼ u ⊼ t :=
image₂_right_comm inf_right_comm
theorem infs_infs_infs_comm : s ⊼ t ⊼ (u ⊼ v) = s ⊼ u ⊼ (t ⊼ v) :=
image₂_image₂_image₂_comm inf_inf_inf_comm
end Infs
open FinsetFamily
section DistribLattice
variable [DecidableEq α]
variable [DistribLattice α] (s t u : Finset α)
theorem sups_infs_subset_left : s ⊻ t ⊼ u ⊆ (s ⊻ t) ⊼ (s ⊻ u) :=
image₂_distrib_subset_left sup_inf_left
theorem sups_infs_subset_right : t ⊼ u ⊻ s ⊆ (t ⊻ s) ⊼ (u ⊻ s) :=
image₂_distrib_subset_right sup_inf_right
theorem infs_sups_subset_left : s ⊼ (t ⊻ u) ⊆ s ⊼ t ⊻ s ⊼ u :=
image₂_distrib_subset_left inf_sup_left
theorem infs_sups_subset_right : (t ⊻ u) ⊼ s ⊆ t ⊼ s ⊻ u ⊼ s :=
image₂_distrib_subset_right inf_sup_right
end DistribLattice
section Finset
variable [DecidableEq α]
variable {𝒜 ℬ : Finset (Finset α)} {s t : Finset α}
@[simp] lemma powerset_union (s t : Finset α) : (s ∪ t).powerset = s.powerset ⊻ t.powerset := by
ext u
simp only [mem_sups, mem_powerset, le_eq_subset, sup_eq_union]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨_, inter_subset_left (s₂ := u), _, inter_subset_left (s₂ := u), ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rwa [← union_inter_distrib_right, inter_eq_right]
· rintro ⟨v, hv, w, hw, rfl⟩
exact union_subset_union hv hw
@[simp] lemma powerset_inter (s t : Finset α) : (s ∩ t).powerset = s.powerset ⊼ t.powerset := by
ext u
simp only [mem_infs, mem_powerset, le_eq_subset, inf_eq_inter]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨_, inter_subset_left (s₂ := u), _, inter_subset_left (s₂ := u), ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rwa [← inter_inter_distrib_right, inter_eq_right]
· rintro ⟨v, hv, w, hw, rfl⟩
exact inter_subset_inter hv hw
@[simp] lemma powerset_sups_powerset_self (s : Finset α) :
s.powerset ⊻ s.powerset = s.powerset := by simp [← powerset_union]
@[simp] lemma powerset_infs_powerset_self (s : Finset α) :
s.powerset ⊼ s.powerset = s.powerset := by simp [← powerset_inter]
lemma union_mem_sups : s ∈ 𝒜 → t ∈ ℬ → s ∪ t ∈ 𝒜 ⊻ ℬ := sup_mem_sups
lemma inter_mem_infs : s ∈ 𝒜 → t ∈ ℬ → s ∩ t ∈ 𝒜 ⊼ ℬ := inf_mem_infs
end Finset
section DisjSups
variable [DecidableEq α]
variable [SemilatticeSup α] [OrderBot α] [DecidableRel (α := α) Disjoint]
(s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u : Finset α)
/-- The finset of elements of the form `a ⊔ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t` and `a` and `b` are disjoint.
-/
def disjSups : Finset α := {ab ∈ s ×ˢ t | Disjoint ab.1 ab.2}.image fun ab => ab.1 ⊔ ab.2
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[FinsetFamily] infixl:74 " ○ " => Finset.disjSups
open FinsetFamily
variable {s t u} {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem mem_disjSups : c ∈ s ○ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, ∃ b ∈ t, Disjoint a b ∧ a ⊔ b = c := by
simp [disjSups, and_assoc]
theorem disjSups_subset_sups : s ○ t ⊆ s ⊻ t := by
simp_rw [subset_iff, mem_sups, mem_disjSups]
exact fun c ⟨a, b, ha, hb, _, hc⟩ => ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hc⟩
variable (s t)
theorem card_disjSups_le : #(s ○ t) ≤ #s * #t :=
(card_le_card disjSups_subset_sups).trans <| card_sups_le _ _
variable {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂}
theorem disjSups_subset (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s₁ ○ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ○ t₂ :=
image_subset_image <| filter_subset_filter _ <| product_subset_product hs ht
theorem disjSups_subset_left (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s ○ t₁ ⊆ s ○ t₂ :=
disjSups_subset Subset.rfl ht
theorem disjSups_subset_right (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ○ t ⊆ s₂ ○ t :=
disjSups_subset hs Subset.rfl
theorem forall_disjSups_iff {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ c ∈ s ○ t, p c) ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, Disjoint a b → p (a ⊔ b) := by
simp_rw [mem_disjSups]
refine ⟨fun h a ha b hb hab => h _ ⟨_, ha, _, hb, hab, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
rintro h _ ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab, rfl⟩
exact h _ ha _ hb hab
@[simp]
theorem disjSups_subset_iff : s ○ t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, Disjoint a b → a ⊔ b ∈ u :=
forall_disjSups_iff
theorem Nonempty.of_disjSups_left : (s ○ t).Nonempty → s.Nonempty := by
simp_rw [Finset.Nonempty, mem_disjSups]
exact fun ⟨_, a, ha, _⟩ => ⟨a, ha⟩
theorem Nonempty.of_disjSups_right : (s ○ t).Nonempty → t.Nonempty := by
simp_rw [Finset.Nonempty, mem_disjSups]
exact fun ⟨_, _, _, b, hb, _⟩ => ⟨b, hb⟩
@[simp]
theorem disjSups_empty_left : ∅ ○ t = ∅ := by simp [disjSups]
@[simp]
theorem disjSups_empty_right : s ○ ∅ = ∅ := by simp [disjSups]
theorem disjSups_singleton : ({a} ○ {b} : Finset α) = if Disjoint a b then {a ⊔ b} else ∅ := by
split_ifs with h <;> simp [disjSups, filter_singleton, h]
theorem disjSups_union_left : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ○ t = s₁ ○ t ∪ s₂ ○ t := by
simp [disjSups, filter_union, image_union]
theorem disjSups_union_right : s ○ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s ○ t₁ ∪ s ○ t₂ := by
simp [disjSups, filter_union, image_union]
theorem disjSups_inter_subset_left : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ○ t ⊆ s₁ ○ t ∩ s₂ ○ t := by
simpa only [disjSups, inter_product, filter_inter_distrib] using image_inter_subset _ _ _
theorem disjSups_inter_subset_right : s ○ (t₁ ∩ t₂) ⊆ s ○ t₁ ∩ s ○ t₂ := by
simpa only [disjSups, product_inter, filter_inter_distrib] using image_inter_subset _ _ _
variable (s t)
theorem disjSups_comm : s ○ t = t ○ s := by
aesop (add simp disjoint_comm, simp sup_comm)
instance : @Std.Commutative (Finset α) (· ○ ·) := ⟨disjSups_comm⟩
end DisjSups
open FinsetFamily
section DistribLattice
variable [DecidableEq α]
variable [DistribLattice α] [OrderBot α] [DecidableRel (α := α) Disjoint] (s t u v : Finset α)
theorem disjSups_assoc : ∀ s t u : Finset α, s ○ t ○ u = s ○ (t ○ u) := by
refine (associative_of_commutative_of_le inferInstance ?_).assoc
simp only [le_eq_subset, disjSups_subset_iff, mem_disjSups]
rintro s t u _ ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab, rfl⟩ c hc habc
rw [disjoint_sup_left] at habc
exact ⟨a, ha, _, ⟨b, hb, c, hc, habc.2, rfl⟩, hab.sup_right habc.1, (sup_assoc ..).symm⟩
instance : @Std.Associative (Finset α) (· ○ ·) := ⟨disjSups_assoc⟩
theorem disjSups_left_comm : s ○ (t ○ u) = t ○ (s ○ u) := by
simp_rw [← disjSups_assoc, disjSups_comm s]
theorem disjSups_right_comm : s ○ t ○ u = s ○ u ○ t := by simp_rw [disjSups_assoc, disjSups_comm]
theorem disjSups_disjSups_disjSups_comm : s ○ t ○ (u ○ v) = s ○ u ○ (t ○ v) := by
simp_rw [← disjSups_assoc, disjSups_right_comm]
end DistribLattice
section Diffs
variable [DecidableEq α]
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] (s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u : Finset α)
/-- `s \\ t` is the finset of elements of the form `a \ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`. -/
def diffs : Finset α → Finset α → Finset α := image₂ (· \ ·)
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[FinsetFamily] infixl:74 " \\\\ " => Finset.diffs
-- This notation is meant to have higher precedence than `\` and `⊓`, but still within the
-- realm of other binary notation
open FinsetFamily
variable {s t} {a b c : α}
@[simp] lemma mem_diffs : c ∈ s \\ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, ∃ b ∈ t, a \ b = c := by simp [(· \\ ·)]
variable (s t)
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_diffs : (↑(s \\ t) : Set α) = Set.image2 (· \ ·) s t :=
coe_image₂ _ _ _
lemma card_diffs_le : #(s \\ t) ≤ #s * #t := card_image₂_le _ _ _
lemma card_diffs_iff : #(s \\ t) = #s * #t ↔ (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × α)).InjOn fun x ↦ x.1 \ x.2 :=
card_image₂_iff
variable {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u}
lemma sdiff_mem_diffs : a ∈ s → b ∈ t → a \ b ∈ s \\ t := mem_image₂_of_mem
lemma diffs_subset : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s₁ \\ t₁ ⊆ s₂ \\ t₂ := image₂_subset
lemma diffs_subset_left : t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s \\ t₁ ⊆ s \\ t₂ := image₂_subset_left
lemma diffs_subset_right : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₁ \\ t ⊆ s₂ \\ t := image₂_subset_right
lemma image_subset_diffs_left : b ∈ t → s.image (· \ b) ⊆ s \\ t := image_subset_image₂_left
lemma image_subset_diffs_right : a ∈ s → t.image (a \ ·) ⊆ s \\ t := image_subset_image₂_right
lemma forall_mem_diffs {p : α → Prop} : (∀ c ∈ s \\ t, p c) ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, p (a \ b) :=
forall_mem_image₂
@[simp] lemma diffs_subset_iff : s \\ t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, a \ b ∈ u := image₂_subset_iff
@[simp]
lemma diffs_nonempty : (s \\ t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty := image₂_nonempty_iff
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected lemma Nonempty.diffs : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty → (s \\ t).Nonempty := Nonempty.image₂
lemma Nonempty.of_diffs_left : (s \\ t).Nonempty → s.Nonempty := Nonempty.of_image₂_left
lemma Nonempty.of_diffs_right : (s \\ t).Nonempty → t.Nonempty := Nonempty.of_image₂_right
@[simp] lemma empty_diffs : ∅ \\ t = ∅ := image₂_empty_left
@[simp] lemma diffs_empty : s \\ ∅ = ∅ := image₂_empty_right
@[simp] lemma diffs_eq_empty : s \\ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := image₂_eq_empty_iff
@[simp] lemma singleton_diffs : {a} \\ t = t.image (a \ ·) := image₂_singleton_left
@[simp] lemma diffs_singleton : s \\ {b} = s.image (· \ b) := image₂_singleton_right
lemma singleton_diffs_singleton : ({a} \\ {b} : Finset α) = {a \ b} := image₂_singleton
lemma diffs_union_left : (s₁ ∪ s₂) \\ t = s₁ \\ t ∪ s₂ \\ t := image₂_union_left
lemma diffs_union_right : s \\ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s \\ t₁ ∪ s \\ t₂ := image₂_union_right
lemma diffs_inter_subset_left : (s₁ ∩ s₂) \\ t ⊆ s₁ \\ t ∩ s₂ \\ t := image₂_inter_subset_left
lemma diffs_inter_subset_right : s \\ (t₁ ∩ t₂) ⊆ s \\ t₁ ∩ s \\ t₂ := image₂_inter_subset_right
lemma subset_diffs {s t : Set α} :
↑u ⊆ Set.image2 (· \ ·) s t → ∃ s' t' : Finset α, ↑s' ⊆ s ∧ ↑t' ⊆ t ∧ u ⊆ s' \\ t' :=
subset_set_image₂
variable (s t u)
lemma biUnion_image_sdiff_left : s.biUnion (fun a ↦ t.image (a \ ·)) = s \\ t := biUnion_image_left
lemma biUnion_image_sdiff_right : t.biUnion (fun b ↦ s.image (· \ b)) = s \\ t :=
biUnion_image_right
lemma image_sdiff_product (s t : Finset α) : (s ×ˢ t).image (uncurry (· \ ·)) = s \\ t :=
image_uncurry_product _ _ _
lemma diffs_right_comm : s \\ t \\ u = s \\ u \\ t := image₂_right_comm sdiff_right_comm
end Diffs
section Compls
variable [BooleanAlgebra α] (s s₁ s₂ t : Finset α)
/-- `sᶜˢ` is the finset of elements of the form `aᶜ` where `a ∈ s`. -/
def compls : Finset α → Finset α := map ⟨compl, compl_injective⟩
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[FinsetFamily] postfix:max "ᶜˢ" => Finset.compls
open FinsetFamily
variable {s t} {a : α}
@[simp] lemma mem_compls : a ∈ sᶜˢ ↔ aᶜ ∈ s := by
rw [Iff.comm, ← mem_map' ⟨compl, compl_injective⟩, Embedding.coeFn_mk, compl_compl, compls]
variable (s t)
@[simp] lemma image_compl [DecidableEq α] : s.image compl = sᶜˢ := by simp [compls, map_eq_image]
|
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_compls : (↑sᶜˢ : Set α) = compl '' ↑s := coe_map _ _
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Sups.lean | 605 | 606 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Alexander Bentkamp. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alexander Bentkamp, François Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Extr
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
/-!
# Convex and concave functions
This file defines convex and concave functions in vector spaces and proves the finite Jensen
inequality. The integral version can be found in `Analysis.Convex.Integral`.
A function `f : E → β` is `ConvexOn` a set `s` if `s` is itself a convex set, and for any two
points `x y ∈ s`, the segment joining `(x, f x)` to `(y, f y)` is above the graph of `f`.
Equivalently, `ConvexOn 𝕜 f s` means that the epigraph `{p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 ≤ p.2}` is
a convex set.
## Main declarations
* `ConvexOn 𝕜 s f`: The function `f` is convex on `s` with scalars `𝕜`.
* `ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f`: The function `f` is concave on `s` with scalars `𝕜`.
* `StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f`: The function `f` is strictly convex on `s` with scalars `𝕜`.
* `StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f`: The function `f` is strictly concave on `s` with scalars `𝕜`.
-/
open LinearMap Set Convex Pointwise
variable {𝕜 E F α β ι : Type*}
section OrderedSemiring
variable [Semiring 𝕜] [PartialOrder 𝕜]
section AddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid E] [AddCommMonoid F]
section OrderedAddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid α] [PartialOrder α] [AddCommMonoid β] [PartialOrder β]
section SMul
variable (𝕜) [SMul 𝕜 E] [SMul 𝕜 α] [SMul 𝕜 β] (s : Set E) (f : E → β) {g : β → α}
/-- Convexity of functions -/
def ConvexOn : Prop :=
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → a + b = 1 →
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y
/-- Concavity of functions -/
def ConcaveOn : Prop :=
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → a + b = 1 →
a • f x + b • f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y)
/-- Strict convexity of functions -/
def StrictConvexOn : Prop :=
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x ≠ y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
f (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y
/-- Strict concavity of functions -/
def StrictConcaveOn : Prop :=
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x ≠ y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
a • f x + b • f y < f (a • x + b • y)
variable {𝕜 s f}
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
theorem ConvexOn.dual (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (toDual ∘ f) := hf
theorem ConcaveOn.dual (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (toDual ∘ f) := hf
theorem StrictConvexOn.dual (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (toDual ∘ f) := hf
theorem StrictConcaveOn.dual (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (toDual ∘ f) := hf
theorem convexOn_id {s : Set β} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s _root_.id :=
⟨hs, by
intros
rfl⟩
theorem concaveOn_id {s : Set β} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s _root_.id :=
⟨hs, by
intros
rfl⟩
section congr
variable {g : E → β}
theorem ConvexOn.congr (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hfg : EqOn f g s) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s g :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => by
simpa only [← hfg hx, ← hfg hy, ← hfg (hf.1 hx hy ha hb hab)] using hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab⟩
theorem ConcaveOn.congr (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hfg : EqOn f g s) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s g :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => by
simpa only [← hfg hx, ← hfg hy, ← hfg (hf.1 hx hy ha hb hab)] using hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab⟩
theorem StrictConvexOn.congr (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hfg : EqOn f g s) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s g :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab => by
simpa only [← hfg hx, ← hfg hy, ← hfg (hf.1 hx hy ha.le hb.le hab)] using
hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab⟩
theorem StrictConcaveOn.congr (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hfg : EqOn f g s) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s g :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab => by
simpa only [← hfg hx, ← hfg hy, ← hfg (hf.1 hx hy ha.le hb.le hab)] using
hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab⟩
end congr
theorem ConvexOn.subset {t : Set E} (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 t f) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ hx _ hy => hf.2 (hst hx) (hst hy)⟩
theorem ConcaveOn.subset {t : Set E} (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 t f) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ hx _ hy => hf.2 (hst hx) (hst hy)⟩
theorem StrictConvexOn.subset {t : Set E} (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 t f) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ hx _ hy => hf.2 (hst hx) (hst hy)⟩
theorem StrictConcaveOn.subset {t : Set E} (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 t f) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ hx _ hy => hf.2 (hst hx) (hst hy)⟩
theorem ConvexOn.comp (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : MonotoneOn g (f '' s)) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
⟨hf.1, fun _ hx _ hy _ _ ha hb hab =>
(hg' (mem_image_of_mem f <| hf.1 hx hy ha hb hab)
(hg.1 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha hb hab) <|
hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab).trans <|
hg.2 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha hb hab⟩
theorem ConcaveOn.comp (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : MonotoneOn g (f '' s)) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
⟨hf.1, fun _ hx _ hy _ _ ha hb hab =>
(hg.2 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha hb hab).trans <|
hg' (hg.1 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha hb hab)
(mem_image_of_mem f <| hf.1 hx hy ha hb hab) <|
hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab⟩
theorem ConvexOn.comp_concaveOn (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : AntitoneOn g (f '' s)) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
hg.dual.comp hf hg'
theorem ConcaveOn.comp_convexOn (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : AntitoneOn g (f '' s)) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
hg.dual.comp hf hg'
theorem StrictConvexOn.comp (hg : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : StrictMonoOn g (f '' s)) (hf' : s.InjOn f) : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
⟨hf.1, fun _ hx _ hy hxy _ _ ha hb hab =>
(hg' (mem_image_of_mem f <| hf.1 hx hy ha.le hb.le hab)
(hg.1 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha.le hb.le hab) <|
hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab).trans <|
hg.2 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) (mt (hf' hx hy) hxy) ha hb hab⟩
theorem StrictConcaveOn.comp (hg : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g) (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg' : StrictMonoOn g (f '' s)) (hf' : s.InjOn f) : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
⟨hf.1, fun _ hx _ hy hxy _ _ ha hb hab =>
(hg.2 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) (mt (hf' hx hy) hxy) ha hb hab).trans <|
hg' (hg.1 (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem f hy) ha.le hb.le hab)
(mem_image_of_mem f <| hf.1 hx hy ha.le hb.le hab) <|
hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab⟩
theorem StrictConvexOn.comp_strictConcaveOn (hg : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g)
(hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg' : StrictAntiOn g (f '' s)) (hf' : s.InjOn f) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
hg.dual.comp hf hg' hf'
theorem StrictConcaveOn.comp_strictConvexOn (hg : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 (f '' s) g)
(hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg' : StrictAntiOn g (f '' s)) (hf' : s.InjOn f) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (g ∘ f) :=
hg.dual.comp hf hg' hf'
end SMul
section DistribMulAction
variable [IsOrderedAddMonoid β] [SMul 𝕜 E] [DistribMulAction 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f g : E → β}
theorem ConvexOn.add (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 s g) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab =>
calc
f (a • x + b • y) + g (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y + (a • g x + b • g y) :=
add_le_add (hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab) (hg.2 hx hy ha hb hab)
_ = a • (f x + g x) + b • (f y + g y) := by rw [smul_add, smul_add, add_add_add_comm]
⟩
theorem ConcaveOn.add (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
hf.dual.add hg
end DistribMulAction
section Module
variable [SMul 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
theorem convexOn_const (c : β) (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s fun _ : E => c :=
⟨hs, fun _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ hab => (Convex.combo_self hab c).ge⟩
theorem concaveOn_const (c : β) (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s fun _ => c :=
convexOn_const (β := βᵒᵈ) _ hs
theorem ConvexOn.add_const [IsOrderedAddMonoid β] (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (b : β) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s (f + fun _ => b) :=
hf.add (convexOn_const _ hf.1)
theorem ConcaveOn.add_const [IsOrderedAddMonoid β] (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (b : β) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f + fun _ => b) :=
hf.add (concaveOn_const _ hf.1)
theorem convexOn_of_convex_epigraph (h : Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 ≤ p.2 }) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => (@h (x, f x) ⟨hx, le_rfl⟩ (y, f y) ⟨hy, le_rfl⟩ a b ha hb hab).1,
fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => (@h (x, f x) ⟨hx, le_rfl⟩ (y, f y) ⟨hy, le_rfl⟩ a b ha hb hab).2⟩
theorem concaveOn_of_convex_hypograph (h : Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ≤ f p.1 }) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
convexOn_of_convex_epigraph (β := βᵒᵈ) h
end Module
section OrderedSMul
variable [IsOrderedAddMonoid β] [SMul 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β] [OrderedSMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
theorem ConvexOn.convex_le (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (r : β) : Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | f x ≤ r }) :=
fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab =>
⟨hf.1 hx.1 hy.1 ha hb hab,
calc
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx.1 hy.1 ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • r + b • r := by
gcongr
· exact hx.2
· exact hy.2
_ = r := Convex.combo_self hab r
⟩
theorem ConcaveOn.convex_ge (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (r : β) : Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | r ≤ f x }) :=
hf.dual.convex_le r
theorem ConvexOn.convex_epigraph (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) :
Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 ≤ p.2 } := by
rintro ⟨x, r⟩ ⟨hx, hr⟩ ⟨y, t⟩ ⟨hy, ht⟩ a b ha hb hab
refine ⟨hf.1 hx hy ha hb hab, ?_⟩
calc
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • r + b • t := by gcongr
theorem ConcaveOn.convex_hypograph (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) :
Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ≤ f p.1 } :=
hf.dual.convex_epigraph
theorem convexOn_iff_convex_epigraph :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f ↔ Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 ≤ p.2 } :=
⟨ConvexOn.convex_epigraph, convexOn_of_convex_epigraph⟩
theorem concaveOn_iff_convex_hypograph :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f ↔ Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ≤ f p.1 } :=
convexOn_iff_convex_epigraph (β := βᵒᵈ)
end OrderedSMul
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [SMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
/-- Right translation preserves convexity. -/
theorem ConvexOn.translate_right (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (c : E) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 ((fun z => c + z) ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ fun z => c + z) :=
⟨hf.1.translate_preimage_right _, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab =>
calc
f (c + (a • x + b • y)) = f (a • (c + x) + b • (c + y)) := by
rw [smul_add, smul_add, add_add_add_comm, Convex.combo_self hab]
_ ≤ a • f (c + x) + b • f (c + y) := hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab
⟩
/-- Right translation preserves concavity. -/
theorem ConcaveOn.translate_right (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (c : E) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 ((fun z => c + z) ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ fun z => c + z) :=
hf.dual.translate_right _
/-- Left translation preserves convexity. -/
theorem ConvexOn.translate_left (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (c : E) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 ((fun z => c + z) ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ fun z => z + c) := by
simpa only [add_comm c] using hf.translate_right c
/-- Left translation preserves concavity. -/
theorem ConcaveOn.translate_left (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (c : E) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 ((fun z => c + z) ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ fun z => z + c) :=
hf.dual.translate_left _
end Module
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β]
theorem convexOn_iff_forall_pos {s : Set E} {f : E → β} :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f ↔ Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b →
a + b = 1 → f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := by
refine and_congr_right'
⟨fun h x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => h hx hy ha.le hb.le hab, fun h x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
obtain rfl | ha' := ha.eq_or_lt
· rw [zero_add] at hab
subst b
simp_rw [zero_smul, zero_add, one_smul, le_rfl]
obtain rfl | hb' := hb.eq_or_lt
· rw [add_zero] at hab
subst a
simp_rw [zero_smul, add_zero, one_smul, le_rfl]
exact h hx hy ha' hb' hab
theorem concaveOn_iff_forall_pos {s : Set E} {f : E → β} :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f ↔
Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
a • f x + b • f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y) :=
convexOn_iff_forall_pos (β := βᵒᵈ)
theorem convexOn_iff_pairwise_pos {s : Set E} {f : E → β} :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f ↔
Convex 𝕜 s ∧
s.Pairwise fun x y =>
∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 → f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := by
rw [convexOn_iff_forall_pos]
refine
and_congr_right'
⟨fun h x hx y hy _ a b ha hb hab => h hx hy ha hb hab, fun h x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
obtain rfl | hxy := eq_or_ne x y
· rw [Convex.combo_self hab, Convex.combo_self hab]
exact h hx hy hxy ha hb hab
theorem concaveOn_iff_pairwise_pos {s : Set E} {f : E → β} :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f ↔
Convex 𝕜 s ∧
s.Pairwise fun x y =>
∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 → a • f x + b • f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y) :=
convexOn_iff_pairwise_pos (β := βᵒᵈ)
/-- A linear map is convex. -/
theorem LinearMap.convexOn (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] β) {s : Set E} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ => by rw [f.map_add, f.map_smul, f.map_smul]⟩
/-- A linear map is concave. -/
theorem LinearMap.concaveOn (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] β) {s : Set E} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
⟨hs, fun _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ => by rw [f.map_add, f.map_smul, f.map_smul]⟩
theorem StrictConvexOn.convexOn {s : Set E} {f : E → β} (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f :=
convexOn_iff_pairwise_pos.mpr
⟨hf.1, fun _ hx _ hy hxy _ _ ha hb hab => (hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab).le⟩
theorem StrictConcaveOn.concaveOn {s : Set E} {f : E → β} (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
hf.dual.convexOn
section OrderedSMul
variable [IsOrderedAddMonoid β] [OrderedSMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
theorem StrictConvexOn.convex_lt (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (r : β) :
Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | f x < r }) :=
convex_iff_pairwise_pos.2 fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab =>
⟨hf.1 hx.1 hy.1 ha.le hb.le hab,
calc
f (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx.1 hy.1 hxy ha hb hab
_ ≤ a • r + b • r := by
gcongr
· exact hx.2.le
· exact hy.2.le
_ = r := Convex.combo_self hab r
⟩
theorem StrictConcaveOn.convex_gt (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (r : β) :
Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | r < f x }) :=
hf.dual.convex_lt r
end OrderedSMul
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder E] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
/-- For a function on a convex set in a linearly ordered space (where the order and the algebraic
structures aren't necessarily compatible), in order to prove that it is convex, it suffices to
verify the inequality `f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y` only for `x < y` and positive `a`,
`b`. The main use case is `E = 𝕜` however one can apply it, e.g., to `𝕜^n` with lexicographic order.
-/
theorem LinearOrder.convexOn_of_lt (hs : Convex 𝕜 s)
(hf : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x < y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 s f := by
refine convexOn_iff_pairwise_pos.2 ⟨hs, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
wlog h : x < y
· rw [add_comm (a • x), add_comm (a • f x)]
rw [add_comm] at hab
exact this hs hf y hy x hx hxy.symm b a hb ha hab (hxy.lt_or_lt.resolve_left h)
exact hf hx hy h ha hb hab
/-- For a function on a convex set in a linearly ordered space (where the order and the algebraic
structures aren't necessarily compatible), in order to prove that it is concave it suffices to
verify the inequality `a • f x + b • f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y)` for `x < y` and positive `a`, `b`. The
main use case is `E = ℝ` however one can apply it, e.g., to `ℝ^n` with lexicographic order. -/
theorem LinearOrder.concaveOn_of_lt (hs : Convex 𝕜 s)
(hf : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x < y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
a • f x + b • f y ≤ f (a • x + b • y)) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
LinearOrder.convexOn_of_lt (β := βᵒᵈ) hs hf
/-- For a function on a convex set in a linearly ordered space (where the order and the algebraic
structures aren't necessarily compatible), in order to prove that it is strictly convex, it suffices
to verify the inequality `f (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y` for `x < y` and positive `a`, `b`.
The main use case is `E = 𝕜` however one can apply it, e.g., to `𝕜^n` with lexicographic order. -/
theorem LinearOrder.strictConvexOn_of_lt (hs : Convex 𝕜 s)
(hf : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x < y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
f (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f := by
refine ⟨hs, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab => ?_⟩
wlog h : x < y
· rw [add_comm (a • x), add_comm (a • f x)]
rw [add_comm] at hab
exact this hs hf y hy x hx hxy.symm b a hb ha hab (hxy.lt_or_lt.resolve_left h)
exact hf hx hy h ha hb hab
/-- For a function on a convex set in a linearly ordered space (where the order and the algebraic
structures aren't necessarily compatible), in order to prove that it is strictly concave it suffices
to verify the inequality `a • f x + b • f y < f (a • x + b • y)` for `x < y` and positive `a`, `b`.
The main use case is `E = 𝕜` however one can apply it, e.g., to `𝕜^n` with lexicographic order. -/
theorem LinearOrder.strictConcaveOn_of_lt (hs : Convex 𝕜 s)
(hf : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → x < y → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 →
a • f x + b • f y < f (a • x + b • y)) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
LinearOrder.strictConvexOn_of_lt (β := βᵒᵈ) hs hf
end LinearOrder
end Module
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 F] [SMul 𝕜 β]
/-- If `g` is convex on `s`, so is `(f ∘ g)` on `f ⁻¹' s` for a linear `f`. -/
theorem ConvexOn.comp_linearMap {f : F → β} {s : Set F} (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (g : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) :
ConvexOn 𝕜 (g ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ g) :=
⟨hf.1.linear_preimage _, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab =>
calc
f (g (a • x + b • y)) = f (a • g x + b • g y) := by rw [g.map_add, g.map_smul, g.map_smul]
_ ≤ a • f (g x) + b • f (g y) := hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab⟩
/-- If `g` is concave on `s`, so is `(g ∘ f)` on `f ⁻¹' s` for a linear `f`. -/
theorem ConcaveOn.comp_linearMap {f : F → β} {s : Set F} (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (g : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) :
ConcaveOn 𝕜 (g ⁻¹' s) (f ∘ g) :=
hf.dual.comp_linearMap g
end Module
end OrderedAddCommMonoid
section OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid β] [PartialOrder β] [IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid β]
section DistribMulAction
variable [SMul 𝕜 E] [DistribMulAction 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f g : E → β}
theorem StrictConvexOn.add_convexOn (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab =>
calc
f (a • x + b • y) + g (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y + (a • g x + b • g y) :=
add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le (hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab) (hg.2 hx hy ha.le hb.le hab)
_ = a • (f x + g x) + b • (f y + g y) := by rw [smul_add, smul_add, add_add_add_comm]⟩
theorem ConvexOn.add_strictConvexOn (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
add_comm g f ▸ hg.add_convexOn hf
theorem StrictConvexOn.add (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab =>
calc
f (a • x + b • y) + g (a • x + b • y) < a • f x + b • f y + (a • g x + b • g y) :=
add_lt_add (hf.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab) (hg.2 hx hy hxy ha hb hab)
_ = a • (f x + g x) + b • (f y + g y) := by rw [smul_add, smul_add, add_add_add_comm]⟩
theorem StrictConcaveOn.add_concaveOn (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
hf.dual.add_convexOn hg.dual
theorem ConcaveOn.add_strictConcaveOn (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
hf.dual.add_strictConvexOn hg.dual
theorem StrictConcaveOn.add (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s g) :
StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f + g) :=
hf.dual.add hg
theorem StrictConvexOn.add_const {γ : Type*} {f : E → γ}
[AddCommMonoid γ] [PartialOrder γ] [IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid γ]
[Module 𝕜 γ] (hf : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (b : γ) : StrictConvexOn 𝕜 s (f + fun _ => b) :=
hf.add_convexOn (convexOn_const _ hf.1)
theorem StrictConcaveOn.add_const {γ : Type*} {f : E → γ}
[AddCommMonoid γ] [PartialOrder γ] [IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid γ]
[Module 𝕜 γ] (hf : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (b : γ) : StrictConcaveOn 𝕜 s (f + fun _ => b) :=
hf.add_concaveOn (concaveOn_const _ hf.1)
end DistribMulAction
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β] [OrderedSMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E} {f : E → β}
theorem ConvexOn.convex_lt (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (r : β) : Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | f x < r }) :=
convex_iff_forall_pos.2 fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab =>
⟨hf.1 hx.1 hy.1 ha.le hb.le hab,
calc
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y := hf.2 hx.1 hy.1 ha.le hb.le hab
_ < a • r + b • r :=
(add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hx.2 ha)
(smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hy.2.le hb.le))
_ = r := Convex.combo_self hab _⟩
theorem ConcaveOn.convex_gt (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (r : β) : Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | r < f x }) :=
hf.dual.convex_lt r
theorem ConvexOn.openSegment_subset_strict_epigraph (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (p q : E × β)
(hp : p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 < p.2) (hq : q.1 ∈ s ∧ f q.1 ≤ q.2) :
openSegment 𝕜 p q ⊆ { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 < p.2 } := by
rintro _ ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, rfl⟩
refine ⟨hf.1 hp.1 hq.1 ha.le hb.le hab, ?_⟩
calc
f (a • p.1 + b • q.1) ≤ a • f p.1 + b • f q.1 := hf.2 hp.1 hq.1 ha.le hb.le hab
_ < a • p.2 + b • q.2 := add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le
(smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hp.2 ha) (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hq.2 hb.le)
theorem ConcaveOn.openSegment_subset_strict_hypograph (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (p q : E × β)
(hp : p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 < f p.1) (hq : q.1 ∈ s ∧ q.2 ≤ f q.1) :
openSegment 𝕜 p q ⊆ { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 < f p.1 } :=
hf.dual.openSegment_subset_strict_epigraph p q hp hq
theorem ConvexOn.convex_strict_epigraph [ZeroLEOneClass 𝕜] (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) :
Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 < p.2 } :=
convex_iff_openSegment_subset.mpr fun p hp q hq =>
hf.openSegment_subset_strict_epigraph p q hp ⟨hq.1, hq.2.le⟩
theorem ConcaveOn.convex_strict_hypograph [ZeroLEOneClass 𝕜] (hf : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) :
Convex 𝕜 { p : E × β | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 < f p.1 } :=
hf.dual.convex_strict_epigraph
end Module
end OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid
| section LinearOrderedAddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid β] [LinearOrder β] [IsOrderedAddMonoid β]
[SMul 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 β] [OrderedSMul 𝕜 β] {s : Set E}
{f g : E → β}
/-- The pointwise maximum of convex functions is convex. -/
theorem ConvexOn.sup (hf : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hg : ConvexOn 𝕜 s g) : ConvexOn 𝕜 s (f ⊔ g) := by
refine ⟨hf.left, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => sup_le ?_ ?_⟩
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Function.lean | 565 | 573 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Abs
import Mathlib.Dynamics.FixedPoints.Prufer
import Mathlib.Dynamics.Ergodic.Ergodic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Covering.DensityTheorem
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.AddCircle
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.Unique
/-!
# Ergodic maps of the additive circle
This file contains proofs of ergodicity for maps of the additive circle.
## Main definitions:
* `AddCircle.ergodic_zsmul`: given `n : ℤ` such that `1 < |n|`, the self map `y ↦ n • y` on
the additive circle is ergodic (wrt the Haar measure).
* `AddCircle.ergodic_nsmul`: given `n : ℕ` such that `1 < n`, the self map `y ↦ n • y` on
the additive circle is ergodic (wrt the Haar measure).
* `AddCircle.ergodic_zsmul_add`: given `n : ℤ` such that `1 < |n|` and `x : AddCircle T`, the
self map `y ↦ n • y + x` on the additive circle is ergodic (wrt the Haar measure).
* `AddCircle.ergodic_nsmul_add`: given `n : ℕ` such that `1 < n` and `x : AddCircle T`, the
self map `y ↦ n • y + x` on the additive circle is ergodic (wrt the Haar measure).
-/
open Set Function MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Filter Metric
open scoped MeasureTheory NNReal ENNReal Topology Pointwise
namespace AddCircle
variable {T : ℝ} [hT : Fact (0 < T)]
/-- If a null-measurable subset of the circle is almost invariant under rotation by a family of
rational angles with denominators tending to infinity, then it must be almost empty or almost full.
-/
theorem ae_empty_or_univ_of_forall_vadd_ae_eq_self {s : Set <| AddCircle T}
(hs : NullMeasurableSet s volume) {ι : Type*} {l : Filter ι} [l.NeBot] {u : ι → AddCircle T}
(hu₁ : ∀ i, (u i +ᵥ s : Set _) =ᵐ[volume] s) (hu₂ : Tendsto (addOrderOf ∘ u) l atTop) :
s =ᵐ[volume] (∅ : Set <| AddCircle T) ∨ s =ᵐ[volume] univ := by
/- Sketch of proof:
Assume `T = 1` for simplicity and let `μ` be the Haar measure. We may assume `s` has positive
measure since otherwise there is nothing to prove. In this case, by Lebesgue's density theorem,
there exists a point `d` of positive density. Let `Iⱼ` be the sequence of closed balls about `d`
of diameter `1 / nⱼ` where `nⱼ` is the additive order of `uⱼ`. Since `d` has positive density we
must have `μ (s ∩ Iⱼ) / μ Iⱼ → 1` along `l`. However since `s` is invariant under the action of
`uⱼ` and since `Iⱼ` is a fundamental domain for this action, we must have
`μ (s ∩ Iⱼ) = nⱼ * μ s = (μ Iⱼ) * μ s`. We thus have `μ s → 1` and thus `μ s = 1`. -/
set μ := (volume : Measure <| AddCircle T)
set n : ι → ℕ := addOrderOf ∘ u
have hT₀ : 0 < T := hT.out
have hT₁ : ENNReal.ofReal T ≠ 0 := by simpa
rw [ae_eq_empty, ae_eq_univ_iff_measure_eq hs, AddCircle.measure_univ]
rcases eq_or_ne (μ s) 0 with h | h; · exact Or.inl h
right
obtain ⟨d, -, hd⟩ : ∃ d, d ∈ s ∧ ∀ {ι'} {l : Filter ι'} (w : ι' → AddCircle T) (δ : ι' → ℝ),
Tendsto δ l (𝓝[>] 0) → (∀ᶠ j in l, d ∈ closedBall (w j) (1 * δ j)) →
Tendsto (fun j => μ (s ∩ closedBall (w j) (δ j)) / μ (closedBall (w j) (δ j))) l (𝓝 1) :=
exists_mem_of_measure_ne_zero_of_ae h
(IsUnifLocDoublingMeasure.ae_tendsto_measure_inter_div μ s 1)
let I : ι → Set (AddCircle T) := fun j => closedBall d (T / (2 * ↑(n j)))
replace hd : Tendsto (fun j => μ (s ∩ I j) / μ (I j)) l (𝓝 1) := by
let δ : ι → ℝ := fun j => T / (2 * ↑(n j))
have hδ₀ : ∀ᶠ j in l, 0 < δ j :=
(hu₂.eventually_gt_atTop 0).mono fun j hj => div_pos hT₀ <| by positivity
have hδ₁ : Tendsto δ l (𝓝[>] 0) := by
refine tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff.mpr ⟨?_, hδ₀⟩
replace hu₂ : Tendsto (fun j => T⁻¹ * 2 * n j) l atTop :=
(tendsto_natCast_atTop_iff.mpr hu₂).const_mul_atTop (by positivity : 0 < T⁻¹ * 2)
convert hu₂.inv_tendsto_atTop
ext j
simp only [δ, Pi.inv_apply, mul_inv_rev, inv_inv, div_eq_inv_mul, ← mul_assoc]
have hw : ∀ᶠ j in l, d ∈ closedBall d (1 * δ j) := hδ₀.mono fun j hj => by
simp only [comp_apply, one_mul, mem_closedBall, dist_self]
apply hj.le
exact hd _ δ hδ₁ hw
suffices ∀ᶠ j in l, μ (s ∩ I j) / μ (I j) = μ s / ENNReal.ofReal T by
replace hd := hd.congr' this
rwa [tendsto_const_nhds_iff, ENNReal.div_eq_one_iff hT₁ ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top] at hd
refine (hu₂.eventually_gt_atTop 0).mono fun j hj => ?_
have : addOrderOf (u j) = n j := rfl
have huj : IsOfFinAddOrder (u j) := addOrderOf_pos_iff.mp hj
have huj' : 1 ≤ (↑(n j) : ℝ) := by norm_cast
have hI₀ : μ (I j) ≠ 0 := (measure_closedBall_pos _ d <| by positivity).ne.symm
have hI₁ : μ (I j) ≠ ⊤ := measure_ne_top _ _
have hI₂ : μ (I j) * ↑(n j) = ENNReal.ofReal T := by
rw [volume_closedBall, mul_div, mul_div_mul_left T _ two_ne_zero,
min_eq_right (div_le_self hT₀.le huj'), mul_comm, ← nsmul_eq_mul, ← ENNReal.ofReal_nsmul,
nsmul_eq_mul, mul_div_cancel₀]
exact Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr hj.ne'
rw [ENNReal.div_eq_div_iff hT₁ ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top hI₀ hI₁,
volume_of_add_preimage_eq s _ (u j) d huj (hu₁ j) closedBall_ae_eq_ball, nsmul_eq_mul, ←
mul_assoc, this, hI₂]
theorem ergodic_zsmul {n : ℤ} (hn : 1 < |n|) : Ergodic fun y : AddCircle T => n • y :=
{ measurePreserving_zsmul volume (abs_pos.mp <| lt_trans zero_lt_one hn) with
aeconst_set := fun s hs hs' => by
let u : ℕ → AddCircle T := fun j => ↑((↑1 : ℝ) / ↑(n.natAbs ^ j) * T)
replace hn : 1 < n.natAbs := by rwa [Int.abs_eq_natAbs, Nat.one_lt_cast] at hn
have hu₀ : ∀ j, addOrderOf (u j) = n.natAbs ^ j := fun j => by
convert addOrderOf_div_of_gcd_eq_one (p := T) (m := 1)
(pow_pos (pos_of_gt hn) j) (gcd_one_left _)
norm_cast
have hnu : ∀ j, n ^ j • u j = 0 := fun j => by
rw [← addOrderOf_dvd_iff_zsmul_eq_zero, hu₀, Int.natCast_pow, Int.natCast_natAbs, ← abs_pow,
abs_dvd]
have hu₁ : ∀ j, (u j +ᵥ s : Set _) =ᵐ[volume] s := fun j => by
rw [vadd_eq_self_of_preimage_zsmul_eq_self hs' (hnu j)]
have hu₂ : Tendsto (fun j => addOrderOf <| u j) atTop atTop := by
simp_rw [hu₀]; exact Nat.tendsto_pow_atTop_atTop_of_one_lt hn
rw [eventuallyConst_set']
exact ae_empty_or_univ_of_forall_vadd_ae_eq_self hs.nullMeasurableSet hu₁ hu₂ }
theorem ergodic_nsmul {n : ℕ} (hn : 1 < n) : Ergodic fun y : AddCircle T => n • y :=
ergodic_zsmul (by simp [hn] : 1 < |(n : ℤ)|)
theorem ergodic_zsmul_add (x : AddCircle T) {n : ℤ} (h : 1 < |n|) : Ergodic fun y => n • y + x := by
set f : AddCircle T → AddCircle T := fun y => n • y + x
let e : AddCircle T ≃ᵐ AddCircle T := MeasurableEquiv.addLeft (DivisibleBy.div x <| n - 1)
have he : MeasurePreserving e volume volume :=
| measurePreserving_add_left volume (DivisibleBy.div x <| n - 1)
suffices e ∘ f ∘ e.symm = fun y => n • y by
rw [← he.ergodic_conjugate_iff, this]; exact ergodic_zsmul h
replace h : n - 1 ≠ 0 := by
rw [← abs_one] at h; rw [sub_ne_zero]; exact ne_of_apply_ne _ (ne_of_gt h)
have hnx : n • DivisibleBy.div x (n - 1) = x + DivisibleBy.div x (n - 1) := by
conv_rhs => congr; rw [← DivisibleBy.div_cancel x h]
rw [sub_smul, one_smul, sub_add_cancel]
ext y
simp only [f, e, hnx, MeasurableEquiv.coe_addLeft, MeasurableEquiv.symm_addLeft, comp_apply,
smul_add, zsmul_neg', neg_smul, neg_add_rev]
abel
theorem ergodic_nsmul_add (x : AddCircle T) {n : ℕ} (h : 1 < n) : Ergodic fun y => n • y + x :=
ergodic_zsmul_add x (by simp [h] : 1 < |(n : ℤ)|)
| Mathlib/Dynamics/Ergodic/AddCircle.lean | 127 | 142 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.Directed
import Mathlib.Order.BoundedOrder.Monotone
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
/-!
# Upper / lower bounds
In this file we prove various lemmas about upper/lower bounds of a set:
monotonicity, behaviour under `∪`, `∩`, `insert`,
and provide formulas for `∅`, `univ`, and intervals.
-/
open Function Set
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
universe u v
variable {α : Type u} {γ : Type v}
section
variable [Preorder α] {s t : Set α} {a b : α}
theorem mem_upperBounds : a ∈ upperBounds s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, x ≤ a :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_lowerBounds : a ∈ lowerBounds s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, a ≤ x :=
Iff.rfl
lemma mem_upperBounds_iff_subset_Iic : a ∈ upperBounds s ↔ s ⊆ Iic a := Iff.rfl
lemma mem_lowerBounds_iff_subset_Ici : a ∈ lowerBounds s ↔ s ⊆ Ici a := Iff.rfl
theorem bddAbove_def : BddAbove s ↔ ∃ x, ∀ y ∈ s, y ≤ x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem bddBelow_def : BddBelow s ↔ ∃ x, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≤ y :=
Iff.rfl
theorem bot_mem_lowerBounds [OrderBot α] (s : Set α) : ⊥ ∈ lowerBounds s := fun _ _ => bot_le
theorem top_mem_upperBounds [OrderTop α] (s : Set α) : ⊤ ∈ upperBounds s := fun _ _ => le_top
@[simp]
theorem isLeast_bot_iff [OrderBot α] : IsLeast s ⊥ ↔ ⊥ ∈ s :=
and_iff_left <| bot_mem_lowerBounds _
@[simp]
theorem isGreatest_top_iff [OrderTop α] : IsGreatest s ⊤ ↔ ⊤ ∈ s :=
and_iff_left <| top_mem_upperBounds _
/-- A set `s` is not bounded above if and only if for each `x` there exists `y ∈ s` such that `x`
is not greater than or equal to `y`. This version only assumes `Preorder` structure and uses
`¬(y ≤ x)`. A version for linear orders is called `not_bddAbove_iff`. -/
theorem not_bddAbove_iff' : ¬BddAbove s ↔ ∀ x, ∃ y ∈ s, ¬y ≤ x := by
simp [BddAbove, upperBounds, Set.Nonempty]
/-- A set `s` is not bounded below if and only if for each `x` there exists `y ∈ s` such that `x`
is not less than or equal to `y`. This version only assumes `Preorder` structure and uses
`¬(x ≤ y)`. A version for linear orders is called `not_bddBelow_iff`. -/
theorem not_bddBelow_iff' : ¬BddBelow s ↔ ∀ x, ∃ y ∈ s, ¬x ≤ y :=
@not_bddAbove_iff' αᵒᵈ _ _
/-- A set `s` is not bounded above if and only if for each `x` there exists `y ∈ s` that is greater
than `x`. A version for preorders is called `not_bddAbove_iff'`. -/
theorem not_bddAbove_iff {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] {s : Set α} :
¬BddAbove s ↔ ∀ x, ∃ y ∈ s, x < y := by
simp only [not_bddAbove_iff', not_le]
/-- A set `s` is not bounded below if and only if for each `x` there exists `y ∈ s` that is less
than `x`. A version for preorders is called `not_bddBelow_iff'`. -/
theorem not_bddBelow_iff {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] {s : Set α} :
¬BddBelow s ↔ ∀ x, ∃ y ∈ s, y < x :=
@not_bddAbove_iff αᵒᵈ _ _
@[simp] lemma bddBelow_preimage_ofDual {s : Set α} : BddBelow (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ BddAbove s := Iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma bddAbove_preimage_ofDual {s : Set α} : BddAbove (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ BddBelow s := Iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma bddBelow_preimage_toDual {s : Set αᵒᵈ} :
BddBelow (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ BddAbove s := Iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma bddAbove_preimage_toDual {s : Set αᵒᵈ} :
BddAbove (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ BddBelow s := Iff.rfl
theorem BddAbove.dual (h : BddAbove s) : BddBelow (ofDual ⁻¹' s) :=
h
theorem BddBelow.dual (h : BddBelow s) : BddAbove (ofDual ⁻¹' s) :=
h
theorem IsLeast.dual (h : IsLeast s a) : IsGreatest (ofDual ⁻¹' s) (toDual a) :=
h
theorem IsGreatest.dual (h : IsGreatest s a) : IsLeast (ofDual ⁻¹' s) (toDual a) :=
h
theorem IsLUB.dual (h : IsLUB s a) : IsGLB (ofDual ⁻¹' s) (toDual a) :=
h
theorem IsGLB.dual (h : IsGLB s a) : IsLUB (ofDual ⁻¹' s) (toDual a) :=
h
/-- If `a` is the least element of a set `s`, then subtype `s` is an order with bottom element. -/
abbrev IsLeast.orderBot (h : IsLeast s a) :
OrderBot s where
bot := ⟨a, h.1⟩
bot_le := Subtype.forall.2 h.2
/-- If `a` is the greatest element of a set `s`, then subtype `s` is an order with top element. -/
abbrev IsGreatest.orderTop (h : IsGreatest s a) :
OrderTop s where
top := ⟨a, h.1⟩
le_top := Subtype.forall.2 h.2
theorem isLUB_congr (h : upperBounds s = upperBounds t) : IsLUB s a ↔ IsLUB t a := by
rw [IsLUB, IsLUB, h]
theorem isGLB_congr (h : lowerBounds s = lowerBounds t) : IsGLB s a ↔ IsGLB t a := by
rw [IsGLB, IsGLB, h]
/-!
### Monotonicity
-/
theorem upperBounds_mono_set ⦃s t : Set α⦄ (hst : s ⊆ t) : upperBounds t ⊆ upperBounds s :=
fun _ hb _ h => hb <| hst h
theorem lowerBounds_mono_set ⦃s t : Set α⦄ (hst : s ⊆ t) : lowerBounds t ⊆ lowerBounds s :=
fun _ hb _ h => hb <| hst h
theorem upperBounds_mono_mem ⦃a b⦄ (hab : a ≤ b) : a ∈ upperBounds s → b ∈ upperBounds s :=
fun ha _ h => le_trans (ha h) hab
theorem lowerBounds_mono_mem ⦃a b⦄ (hab : a ≤ b) : b ∈ lowerBounds s → a ∈ lowerBounds s :=
fun hb _ h => le_trans hab (hb h)
theorem upperBounds_mono ⦃s t : Set α⦄ (hst : s ⊆ t) ⦃a b⦄ (hab : a ≤ b) :
a ∈ upperBounds t → b ∈ upperBounds s := fun ha =>
upperBounds_mono_set hst <| upperBounds_mono_mem hab ha
theorem lowerBounds_mono ⦃s t : Set α⦄ (hst : s ⊆ t) ⦃a b⦄ (hab : a ≤ b) :
b ∈ lowerBounds t → a ∈ lowerBounds s := fun hb =>
lowerBounds_mono_set hst <| lowerBounds_mono_mem hab hb
/-- If `s ⊆ t` and `t` is bounded above, then so is `s`. -/
theorem BddAbove.mono ⦃s t : Set α⦄ (h : s ⊆ t) : BddAbove t → BddAbove s :=
Nonempty.mono <| upperBounds_mono_set h
/-- If `s ⊆ t` and `t` is bounded below, then so is `s`. -/
theorem BddBelow.mono ⦃s t : Set α⦄ (h : s ⊆ t) : BddBelow t → BddBelow s :=
Nonempty.mono <| lowerBounds_mono_set h
/-- If `a` is a least upper bound for sets `s` and `p`, then it is a least upper bound for any
set `t`, `s ⊆ t ⊆ p`. -/
theorem IsLUB.of_subset_of_superset {s t p : Set α} (hs : IsLUB s a) (hp : IsLUB p a) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(htp : t ⊆ p) : IsLUB t a :=
⟨upperBounds_mono_set htp hp.1, lowerBounds_mono_set (upperBounds_mono_set hst) hs.2⟩
/-- If `a` is a greatest lower bound for sets `s` and `p`, then it is a greater lower bound for any
set `t`, `s ⊆ t ⊆ p`. -/
theorem IsGLB.of_subset_of_superset {s t p : Set α} (hs : IsGLB s a) (hp : IsGLB p a) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(htp : t ⊆ p) : IsGLB t a :=
hs.dual.of_subset_of_superset hp hst htp
theorem IsLeast.mono (ha : IsLeast s a) (hb : IsLeast t b) (hst : s ⊆ t) : b ≤ a :=
hb.2 (hst ha.1)
theorem IsGreatest.mono (ha : IsGreatest s a) (hb : IsGreatest t b) (hst : s ⊆ t) : a ≤ b :=
hb.2 (hst ha.1)
theorem IsLUB.mono (ha : IsLUB s a) (hb : IsLUB t b) (hst : s ⊆ t) : a ≤ b :=
IsLeast.mono hb ha <| upperBounds_mono_set hst
theorem IsGLB.mono (ha : IsGLB s a) (hb : IsGLB t b) (hst : s ⊆ t) : b ≤ a :=
IsGreatest.mono hb ha <| lowerBounds_mono_set hst
theorem subset_lowerBounds_upperBounds (s : Set α) : s ⊆ lowerBounds (upperBounds s) :=
fun _ hx _ hy => hy hx
theorem subset_upperBounds_lowerBounds (s : Set α) : s ⊆ upperBounds (lowerBounds s) :=
fun _ hx _ hy => hy hx
theorem Set.Nonempty.bddAbove_lowerBounds (hs : s.Nonempty) : BddAbove (lowerBounds s) :=
hs.mono (subset_upperBounds_lowerBounds s)
theorem Set.Nonempty.bddBelow_upperBounds (hs : s.Nonempty) : BddBelow (upperBounds s) :=
hs.mono (subset_lowerBounds_upperBounds s)
/-!
### Conversions
-/
theorem IsLeast.isGLB (h : IsLeast s a) : IsGLB s a :=
⟨h.2, fun _ hb => hb h.1⟩
theorem IsGreatest.isLUB (h : IsGreatest s a) : IsLUB s a :=
⟨h.2, fun _ hb => hb h.1⟩
theorem IsLUB.upperBounds_eq (h : IsLUB s a) : upperBounds s = Ici a :=
Set.ext fun _ => ⟨fun hb => h.2 hb, fun hb => upperBounds_mono_mem hb h.1⟩
theorem IsGLB.lowerBounds_eq (h : IsGLB s a) : lowerBounds s = Iic a :=
h.dual.upperBounds_eq
theorem IsLeast.lowerBounds_eq (h : IsLeast s a) : lowerBounds s = Iic a :=
h.isGLB.lowerBounds_eq
theorem IsGreatest.upperBounds_eq (h : IsGreatest s a) : upperBounds s = Ici a :=
h.isLUB.upperBounds_eq
theorem IsGreatest.lt_iff (h : IsGreatest s a) : a < b ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, x < b :=
⟨fun hlt _x hx => (h.2 hx).trans_lt hlt, fun h' => h' _ h.1⟩
theorem IsLeast.lt_iff (h : IsLeast s a) : b < a ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, b < x :=
h.dual.lt_iff
theorem isLUB_le_iff (h : IsLUB s a) : a ≤ b ↔ b ∈ upperBounds s := by
rw [h.upperBounds_eq]
rfl
theorem le_isGLB_iff (h : IsGLB s a) : b ≤ a ↔ b ∈ lowerBounds s := by
rw [h.lowerBounds_eq]
rfl
theorem isLUB_iff_le_iff : IsLUB s a ↔ ∀ b, a ≤ b ↔ b ∈ upperBounds s :=
⟨fun h _ => isLUB_le_iff h, fun H => ⟨(H _).1 le_rfl, fun b hb => (H b).2 hb⟩⟩
theorem isGLB_iff_le_iff : IsGLB s a ↔ ∀ b, b ≤ a ↔ b ∈ lowerBounds s :=
@isLUB_iff_le_iff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
/-- If `s` has a least upper bound, then it is bounded above. -/
theorem IsLUB.bddAbove (h : IsLUB s a) : BddAbove s :=
⟨a, h.1⟩
/-- If `s` has a greatest lower bound, then it is bounded below. -/
theorem IsGLB.bddBelow (h : IsGLB s a) : BddBelow s :=
⟨a, h.1⟩
/-- If `s` has a greatest element, then it is bounded above. -/
theorem IsGreatest.bddAbove (h : IsGreatest s a) : BddAbove s :=
⟨a, h.2⟩
/-- If `s` has a least element, then it is bounded below. -/
theorem IsLeast.bddBelow (h : IsLeast s a) : BddBelow s :=
⟨a, h.2⟩
theorem IsLeast.nonempty (h : IsLeast s a) : s.Nonempty :=
⟨a, h.1⟩
theorem IsGreatest.nonempty (h : IsGreatest s a) : s.Nonempty :=
⟨a, h.1⟩
/-!
### Union and intersection
-/
@[simp]
theorem upperBounds_union : upperBounds (s ∪ t) = upperBounds s ∩ upperBounds t :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ hb => ⟨fun _ hx => hb (Or.inl hx), fun _ hx => hb (Or.inr hx)⟩)
fun _ hb _ hx => hx.elim (fun hs => hb.1 hs) fun ht => hb.2 ht
@[simp]
theorem lowerBounds_union : lowerBounds (s ∪ t) = lowerBounds s ∩ lowerBounds t :=
@upperBounds_union αᵒᵈ _ s t
theorem union_upperBounds_subset_upperBounds_inter :
upperBounds s ∪ upperBounds t ⊆ upperBounds (s ∩ t) :=
union_subset (upperBounds_mono_set inter_subset_left)
(upperBounds_mono_set inter_subset_right)
theorem union_lowerBounds_subset_lowerBounds_inter :
lowerBounds s ∪ lowerBounds t ⊆ lowerBounds (s ∩ t) :=
@union_upperBounds_subset_upperBounds_inter αᵒᵈ _ s t
theorem isLeast_union_iff {a : α} {s t : Set α} :
IsLeast (s ∪ t) a ↔ IsLeast s a ∧ a ∈ lowerBounds t ∨ a ∈ lowerBounds s ∧ IsLeast t a := by
simp [IsLeast, lowerBounds_union, or_and_right, and_comm (a := a ∈ t), and_assoc]
theorem isGreatest_union_iff :
IsGreatest (s ∪ t) a ↔
IsGreatest s a ∧ a ∈ upperBounds t ∨ a ∈ upperBounds s ∧ IsGreatest t a :=
@isLeast_union_iff αᵒᵈ _ a s t
/-- If `s` is bounded, then so is `s ∩ t` -/
theorem BddAbove.inter_of_left (h : BddAbove s) : BddAbove (s ∩ t) :=
h.mono inter_subset_left
/-- If `t` is bounded, then so is `s ∩ t` -/
theorem BddAbove.inter_of_right (h : BddAbove t) : BddAbove (s ∩ t) :=
h.mono inter_subset_right
/-- If `s` is bounded, then so is `s ∩ t` -/
theorem BddBelow.inter_of_left (h : BddBelow s) : BddBelow (s ∩ t) :=
h.mono inter_subset_left
/-- If `t` is bounded, then so is `s ∩ t` -/
theorem BddBelow.inter_of_right (h : BddBelow t) : BddBelow (s ∩ t) :=
h.mono inter_subset_right
/-- In a directed order, the union of bounded above sets is bounded above. -/
theorem BddAbove.union [IsDirected α (· ≤ ·)] {s t : Set α} :
BddAbove s → BddAbove t → BddAbove (s ∪ t) := by
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩
obtain ⟨c, hca, hcb⟩ := exists_ge_ge a b
rw [BddAbove, upperBounds_union]
exact ⟨c, upperBounds_mono_mem hca ha, upperBounds_mono_mem hcb hb⟩
/-- In a directed order, the union of two sets is bounded above if and only if both sets are. -/
theorem bddAbove_union [IsDirected α (· ≤ ·)] {s t : Set α} :
BddAbove (s ∪ t) ↔ BddAbove s ∧ BddAbove t :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.mono subset_union_left, h.mono subset_union_right⟩, fun h =>
h.1.union h.2⟩
/-- In a codirected order, the union of bounded below sets is bounded below. -/
theorem BddBelow.union [IsDirected α (· ≥ ·)] {s t : Set α} :
BddBelow s → BddBelow t → BddBelow (s ∪ t) :=
@BddAbove.union αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
/-- In a codirected order, the union of two sets is bounded below if and only if both sets are. -/
theorem bddBelow_union [IsDirected α (· ≥ ·)] {s t : Set α} :
BddBelow (s ∪ t) ↔ BddBelow s ∧ BddBelow t :=
@bddAbove_union αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
/-- If `a` is the least upper bound of `s` and `b` is the least upper bound of `t`,
then `a ⊔ b` is the least upper bound of `s ∪ t`. -/
theorem IsLUB.union [SemilatticeSup γ] {a b : γ} {s t : Set γ} (hs : IsLUB s a) (ht : IsLUB t b) :
IsLUB (s ∪ t) (a ⊔ b) :=
⟨fun _ h =>
h.casesOn (fun h => le_sup_of_le_left <| hs.left h) fun h => le_sup_of_le_right <| ht.left h,
fun _ hc =>
sup_le (hs.right fun _ hd => hc <| Or.inl hd) (ht.right fun _ hd => hc <| Or.inr hd)⟩
/-- If `a` is the greatest lower bound of `s` and `b` is the greatest lower bound of `t`,
then `a ⊓ b` is the greatest lower bound of `s ∪ t`. -/
theorem IsGLB.union [SemilatticeInf γ] {a₁ a₂ : γ} {s t : Set γ} (hs : IsGLB s a₁)
(ht : IsGLB t a₂) : IsGLB (s ∪ t) (a₁ ⊓ a₂) :=
hs.dual.union ht
/-- If `a` is the least element of `s` and `b` is the least element of `t`,
then `min a b` is the least element of `s ∪ t`. -/
theorem IsLeast.union [LinearOrder γ] {a b : γ} {s t : Set γ} (ha : IsLeast s a)
(hb : IsLeast t b) : IsLeast (s ∪ t) (min a b) :=
⟨by rcases le_total a b with h | h <;> simp [h, ha.1, hb.1], (ha.isGLB.union hb.isGLB).1⟩
/-- If `a` is the greatest element of `s` and `b` is the greatest element of `t`,
then `max a b` is the greatest element of `s ∪ t`. -/
theorem IsGreatest.union [LinearOrder γ] {a b : γ} {s t : Set γ} (ha : IsGreatest s a)
(hb : IsGreatest t b) : IsGreatest (s ∪ t) (max a b) :=
⟨by rcases le_total a b with h | h <;> simp [h, ha.1, hb.1], (ha.isLUB.union hb.isLUB).1⟩
theorem IsLUB.inter_Ici_of_mem [LinearOrder γ] {s : Set γ} {a b : γ} (ha : IsLUB s a) (hb : b ∈ s) :
IsLUB (s ∩ Ici b) a :=
⟨fun _ hx => ha.1 hx.1, fun c hc =>
have hbc : b ≤ c := hc ⟨hb, le_rfl⟩
ha.2 fun x hx => ((le_total x b).elim fun hxb => hxb.trans hbc) fun hbx => hc ⟨hx, hbx⟩⟩
theorem IsGLB.inter_Iic_of_mem [LinearOrder γ] {s : Set γ} {a b : γ} (ha : IsGLB s a) (hb : b ∈ s) :
IsGLB (s ∩ Iic b) a :=
ha.dual.inter_Ici_of_mem hb
theorem bddAbove_iff_exists_ge [SemilatticeSup γ] {s : Set γ} (x₀ : γ) :
BddAbove s ↔ ∃ x, x₀ ≤ x ∧ ∀ y ∈ s, y ≤ x := by
rw [bddAbove_def, exists_ge_and_iff_exists]
exact Monotone.ball fun x _ => monotone_le
theorem bddBelow_iff_exists_le [SemilatticeInf γ] {s : Set γ} (x₀ : γ) :
BddBelow s ↔ ∃ x, x ≤ x₀ ∧ ∀ y ∈ s, x ≤ y :=
bddAbove_iff_exists_ge (toDual x₀)
theorem BddAbove.exists_ge [SemilatticeSup γ] {s : Set γ} (hs : BddAbove s) (x₀ : γ) :
∃ x, x₀ ≤ x ∧ ∀ y ∈ s, y ≤ x :=
(bddAbove_iff_exists_ge x₀).mp hs
theorem BddBelow.exists_le [SemilatticeInf γ] {s : Set γ} (hs : BddBelow s) (x₀ : γ) :
∃ x, x ≤ x₀ ∧ ∀ y ∈ s, x ≤ y :=
(bddBelow_iff_exists_le x₀).mp hs
/-!
### Specific sets
#### Unbounded intervals
-/
theorem isLeast_Ici : IsLeast (Ici a) a :=
⟨left_mem_Ici, fun _ => id⟩
theorem isGreatest_Iic : IsGreatest (Iic a) a :=
⟨right_mem_Iic, fun _ => id⟩
theorem isLUB_Iic : IsLUB (Iic a) a :=
isGreatest_Iic.isLUB
theorem isGLB_Ici : IsGLB (Ici a) a :=
isLeast_Ici.isGLB
theorem upperBounds_Iic : upperBounds (Iic a) = Ici a :=
isLUB_Iic.upperBounds_eq
theorem lowerBounds_Ici : lowerBounds (Ici a) = Iic a :=
isGLB_Ici.lowerBounds_eq
theorem bddAbove_Iic : BddAbove (Iic a) :=
isLUB_Iic.bddAbove
theorem bddBelow_Ici : BddBelow (Ici a) :=
isGLB_Ici.bddBelow
theorem bddAbove_Iio : BddAbove (Iio a) :=
⟨a, fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx⟩
theorem bddBelow_Ioi : BddBelow (Ioi a) :=
⟨a, fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx⟩
theorem lub_Iio_le (a : α) (hb : IsLUB (Iio a) b) : b ≤ a :=
(isLUB_le_iff hb).mpr fun _ hk => le_of_lt hk
theorem le_glb_Ioi (a : α) (hb : IsGLB (Ioi a) b) : a ≤ b :=
@lub_Iio_le αᵒᵈ _ _ a hb
theorem lub_Iio_eq_self_or_Iio_eq_Iic [PartialOrder γ] {j : γ} (i : γ) (hj : IsLUB (Iio i) j) :
j = i ∨ Iio i = Iic j := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (lub_Iio_le i hj) with hj_eq_i | hj_lt_i
· exact Or.inl hj_eq_i
· right
exact Set.ext fun k => ⟨fun hk_lt => hj.1 hk_lt, fun hk_le_j => lt_of_le_of_lt hk_le_j hj_lt_i⟩
theorem glb_Ioi_eq_self_or_Ioi_eq_Ici [PartialOrder γ] {j : γ} (i : γ) (hj : IsGLB (Ioi i) j) :
j = i ∨ Ioi i = Ici j :=
@lub_Iio_eq_self_or_Iio_eq_Iic γᵒᵈ _ j i hj
section
variable [LinearOrder γ]
theorem exists_lub_Iio (i : γ) : ∃ j, IsLUB (Iio i) j := by
by_cases h_exists_lt : ∃ j, j ∈ upperBounds (Iio i) ∧ j < i
· obtain ⟨j, hj_ub, hj_lt_i⟩ := h_exists_lt
exact ⟨j, hj_ub, fun k hk_ub => hk_ub hj_lt_i⟩
· refine ⟨i, fun j hj => le_of_lt hj, ?_⟩
rw [mem_lowerBounds]
by_contra h
refine h_exists_lt ?_
push_neg at h
exact h
theorem exists_glb_Ioi (i : γ) : ∃ j, IsGLB (Ioi i) j :=
@exists_lub_Iio γᵒᵈ _ i
variable [DenselyOrdered γ]
theorem isLUB_Iio {a : γ} : IsLUB (Iio a) a :=
⟨fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx, fun _ hy => le_of_forall_lt_imp_le_of_dense hy⟩
theorem isGLB_Ioi {a : γ} : IsGLB (Ioi a) a :=
@isLUB_Iio γᵒᵈ _ _ a
theorem upperBounds_Iio {a : γ} : upperBounds (Iio a) = Ici a :=
isLUB_Iio.upperBounds_eq
theorem lowerBounds_Ioi {a : γ} : lowerBounds (Ioi a) = Iic a :=
isGLB_Ioi.lowerBounds_eq
end
/-!
#### Singleton
-/
@[simp] theorem isGreatest_singleton : IsGreatest {a} a :=
⟨mem_singleton a, fun _ hx => le_of_eq <| eq_of_mem_singleton hx⟩
@[simp] theorem isLeast_singleton : IsLeast {a} a :=
@isGreatest_singleton αᵒᵈ _ a
@[simp] theorem isLUB_singleton : IsLUB {a} a :=
isGreatest_singleton.isLUB
@[simp] theorem isGLB_singleton : IsGLB {a} a :=
isLeast_singleton.isGLB
@[simp] lemma bddAbove_singleton : BddAbove ({a} : Set α) := isLUB_singleton.bddAbove
@[simp] lemma bddBelow_singleton : BddBelow ({a} : Set α) := isGLB_singleton.bddBelow
@[simp]
theorem upperBounds_singleton : upperBounds {a} = Ici a :=
isLUB_singleton.upperBounds_eq
@[simp]
theorem lowerBounds_singleton : lowerBounds {a} = Iic a :=
isGLB_singleton.lowerBounds_eq
/-!
#### Bounded intervals
-/
theorem bddAbove_Icc : BddAbove (Icc a b) :=
⟨b, fun _ => And.right⟩
theorem bddBelow_Icc : BddBelow (Icc a b) :=
⟨a, fun _ => And.left⟩
theorem bddAbove_Ico : BddAbove (Ico a b) :=
bddAbove_Icc.mono Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem bddBelow_Ico : BddBelow (Ico a b) :=
bddBelow_Icc.mono Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem bddAbove_Ioc : BddAbove (Ioc a b) :=
bddAbove_Icc.mono Ioc_subset_Icc_self
theorem bddBelow_Ioc : BddBelow (Ioc a b) :=
bddBelow_Icc.mono Ioc_subset_Icc_self
theorem bddAbove_Ioo : BddAbove (Ioo a b) :=
bddAbove_Icc.mono Ioo_subset_Icc_self
theorem bddBelow_Ioo : BddBelow (Ioo a b) :=
bddBelow_Icc.mono Ioo_subset_Icc_self
theorem isGreatest_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : IsGreatest (Icc a b) b :=
⟨right_mem_Icc.2 h, fun _ => And.right⟩
theorem isLUB_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : IsLUB (Icc a b) b :=
(isGreatest_Icc h).isLUB
theorem upperBounds_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : upperBounds (Icc a b) = Ici b :=
(isLUB_Icc h).upperBounds_eq
theorem isLeast_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : IsLeast (Icc a b) a :=
⟨left_mem_Icc.2 h, fun _ => And.left⟩
theorem isGLB_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : IsGLB (Icc a b) a :=
(isLeast_Icc h).isGLB
theorem lowerBounds_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : lowerBounds (Icc a b) = Iic a :=
(isGLB_Icc h).lowerBounds_eq
theorem isGreatest_Ioc (h : a < b) : IsGreatest (Ioc a b) b :=
⟨right_mem_Ioc.2 h, fun _ => And.right⟩
theorem isLUB_Ioc (h : a < b) : IsLUB (Ioc a b) b :=
(isGreatest_Ioc h).isLUB
theorem upperBounds_Ioc (h : a < b) : upperBounds (Ioc a b) = Ici b :=
(isLUB_Ioc h).upperBounds_eq
theorem isLeast_Ico (h : a < b) : IsLeast (Ico a b) a :=
⟨left_mem_Ico.2 h, fun _ => And.left⟩
theorem isGLB_Ico (h : a < b) : IsGLB (Ico a b) a :=
(isLeast_Ico h).isGLB
theorem lowerBounds_Ico (h : a < b) : lowerBounds (Ico a b) = Iic a :=
(isGLB_Ico h).lowerBounds_eq
section
variable [SemilatticeSup γ] [DenselyOrdered γ]
theorem isGLB_Ioo {a b : γ} (h : a < b) : IsGLB (Ioo a b) a :=
⟨fun _ hx => hx.1.le, fun x hx => by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (le_sup_right : a ≤ x ⊔ a) with h₁ | h₂
· exact h₁.symm ▸ le_sup_left
obtain ⟨y, lty, ylt⟩ := exists_between h₂
apply (not_lt_of_le (sup_le (hx ⟨lty, ylt.trans_le (sup_le _ h.le)⟩) lty.le) ylt).elim
obtain ⟨u, au, ub⟩ := exists_between h
apply (hx ⟨au, ub⟩).trans ub.le⟩
theorem lowerBounds_Ioo {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : lowerBounds (Ioo a b) = Iic a :=
(isGLB_Ioo hab).lowerBounds_eq
theorem isGLB_Ioc {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : IsGLB (Ioc a b) a :=
(isGLB_Ioo hab).of_subset_of_superset (isGLB_Icc hab.le) Ioo_subset_Ioc_self Ioc_subset_Icc_self
theorem lowerBounds_Ioc {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : lowerBounds (Ioc a b) = Iic a :=
(isGLB_Ioc hab).lowerBounds_eq
end
section
variable [SemilatticeInf γ] [DenselyOrdered γ]
theorem isLUB_Ioo {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : IsLUB (Ioo a b) b := by
simpa only [Ioo_toDual] using isGLB_Ioo hab.dual
theorem upperBounds_Ioo {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : upperBounds (Ioo a b) = Ici b :=
(isLUB_Ioo hab).upperBounds_eq
theorem isLUB_Ico {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : IsLUB (Ico a b) b := by
simpa only [Ioc_toDual] using isGLB_Ioc hab.dual
theorem upperBounds_Ico {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : upperBounds (Ico a b) = Ici b :=
(isLUB_Ico hab).upperBounds_eq
end
theorem bddBelow_iff_subset_Ici : BddBelow s ↔ ∃ a, s ⊆ Ici a :=
Iff.rfl
theorem bddAbove_iff_subset_Iic : BddAbove s ↔ ∃ a, s ⊆ Iic a :=
Iff.rfl
theorem bddBelow_bddAbove_iff_subset_Icc : BddBelow s ∧ BddAbove s ↔ ∃ a b, s ⊆ Icc a b := by
simp [Ici_inter_Iic.symm, subset_inter_iff, bddBelow_iff_subset_Ici,
bddAbove_iff_subset_Iic, exists_and_left, exists_and_right]
/-!
#### Univ
-/
@[simp] theorem isGreatest_univ_iff : IsGreatest univ a ↔ IsTop a := by
simp [IsGreatest, mem_upperBounds, IsTop]
theorem isGreatest_univ [OrderTop α] : IsGreatest (univ : Set α) ⊤ :=
isGreatest_univ_iff.2 isTop_top
@[simp]
theorem OrderTop.upperBounds_univ [PartialOrder γ] [OrderTop γ] :
upperBounds (univ : Set γ) = {⊤} := by rw [isGreatest_univ.upperBounds_eq, Ici_top]
theorem isLUB_univ [OrderTop α] : IsLUB (univ : Set α) ⊤ :=
isGreatest_univ.isLUB
@[simp]
theorem OrderBot.lowerBounds_univ [PartialOrder γ] [OrderBot γ] :
lowerBounds (univ : Set γ) = {⊥} :=
@OrderTop.upperBounds_univ γᵒᵈ _ _
@[simp] theorem isLeast_univ_iff : IsLeast univ a ↔ IsBot a :=
@isGreatest_univ_iff αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem isLeast_univ [OrderBot α] : IsLeast (univ : Set α) ⊥ :=
@isGreatest_univ αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem isGLB_univ [OrderBot α] : IsGLB (univ : Set α) ⊥ :=
isLeast_univ.isGLB
@[simp]
theorem NoTopOrder.upperBounds_univ [NoTopOrder α] : upperBounds (univ : Set α) = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun b hb =>
not_isTop b fun x => hb (mem_univ x)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-18")]
alias NoMaxOrder.upperBounds_univ := NoTopOrder.upperBounds_univ
@[simp]
theorem NoBotOrder.lowerBounds_univ [NoBotOrder α] : lowerBounds (univ : Set α) = ∅ :=
@NoTopOrder.upperBounds_univ αᵒᵈ _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-18")]
alias NoMinOrder.lowerBounds_univ := NoBotOrder.lowerBounds_univ
@[simp]
theorem not_bddAbove_univ [NoTopOrder α] : ¬BddAbove (univ : Set α) := by simp [BddAbove]
@[simp]
theorem not_bddBelow_univ [NoBotOrder α] : ¬BddBelow (univ : Set α) :=
@not_bddAbove_univ αᵒᵈ _ _
/-!
#### Empty set
-/
@[simp]
theorem upperBounds_empty : upperBounds (∅ : Set α) = univ := by
simp only [upperBounds, eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_setOf_eq, forall_mem_empty, forall_true_iff]
@[simp]
theorem lowerBounds_empty : lowerBounds (∅ : Set α) = univ :=
@upperBounds_empty αᵒᵈ _
@[simp]
theorem bddAbove_empty [Nonempty α] : BddAbove (∅ : Set α) := by
simp only [BddAbove, upperBounds_empty, univ_nonempty]
@[simp]
theorem bddBelow_empty [Nonempty α] : BddBelow (∅ : Set α) := by
simp only [BddBelow, lowerBounds_empty, univ_nonempty]
@[simp] theorem isGLB_empty_iff : IsGLB ∅ a ↔ IsTop a := by
simp [IsGLB]
@[simp] theorem isLUB_empty_iff : IsLUB ∅ a ↔ IsBot a :=
@isGLB_empty_iff αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem isGLB_empty [OrderTop α] : IsGLB ∅ (⊤ : α) :=
isGLB_empty_iff.2 isTop_top
theorem isLUB_empty [OrderBot α] : IsLUB ∅ (⊥ : α) :=
@isGLB_empty αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem IsLUB.nonempty [NoBotOrder α] (hs : IsLUB s a) : s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.2 fun h =>
not_isBot a fun _ => hs.right <| by rw [h, upperBounds_empty]; exact mem_univ _
theorem IsGLB.nonempty [NoTopOrder α] (hs : IsGLB s a) : s.Nonempty :=
hs.dual.nonempty
theorem nonempty_of_not_bddAbove [ha : Nonempty α] (h : ¬BddAbove s) : s.Nonempty :=
(Nonempty.elim ha) fun x => (not_bddAbove_iff'.1 h x).imp fun _ ha => ha.1
theorem nonempty_of_not_bddBelow [Nonempty α] (h : ¬BddBelow s) : s.Nonempty :=
@nonempty_of_not_bddAbove αᵒᵈ _ _ _ h
/-!
#### insert
-/
/-- Adding a point to a set preserves its boundedness above. -/
@[simp]
theorem bddAbove_insert [IsDirected α (· ≤ ·)] {s : Set α} {a : α} :
BddAbove (insert a s) ↔ BddAbove s := by
simp only [insert_eq, bddAbove_union, bddAbove_singleton, true_and]
protected theorem BddAbove.insert [IsDirected α (· ≤ ·)] {s : Set α} (a : α) :
BddAbove s → BddAbove (insert a s) :=
bddAbove_insert.2
/-- Adding a point to a set preserves its boundedness below. -/
@[simp]
theorem bddBelow_insert [IsDirected α (· ≥ ·)] {s : Set α} {a : α} :
BddBelow (insert a s) ↔ BddBelow s := by
simp only [insert_eq, bddBelow_union, bddBelow_singleton, true_and]
protected theorem BddBelow.insert [IsDirected α (· ≥ ·)] {s : Set α} (a : α) :
BddBelow s → BddBelow (insert a s) :=
bddBelow_insert.2
protected theorem IsLUB.insert [SemilatticeSup γ] (a) {b} {s : Set γ} (hs : IsLUB s b) :
IsLUB (insert a s) (a ⊔ b) := by
rw [insert_eq]
exact isLUB_singleton.union hs
protected theorem IsGLB.insert [SemilatticeInf γ] (a) {b} {s : Set γ} (hs : IsGLB s b) :
IsGLB (insert a s) (a ⊓ b) := by
rw [insert_eq]
exact isGLB_singleton.union hs
protected theorem IsGreatest.insert [LinearOrder γ] (a) {b} {s : Set γ} (hs : IsGreatest s b) :
IsGreatest (insert a s) (max a b) := by
rw [insert_eq]
exact isGreatest_singleton.union hs
protected theorem IsLeast.insert [LinearOrder γ] (a) {b} {s : Set γ} (hs : IsLeast s b) :
IsLeast (insert a s) (min a b) := by
rw [insert_eq]
exact isLeast_singleton.union hs
@[simp]
theorem upperBounds_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) :
upperBounds (insert a s) = Ici a ∩ upperBounds s := by
rw [insert_eq, upperBounds_union, upperBounds_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem lowerBounds_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) :
lowerBounds (insert a s) = Iic a ∩ lowerBounds s := by
rw [insert_eq, lowerBounds_union, lowerBounds_singleton]
/-- When there is a global maximum, every set is bounded above. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem OrderTop.bddAbove [OrderTop α] (s : Set α) : BddAbove s :=
⟨⊤, fun a _ => OrderTop.le_top a⟩
/-- When there is a global minimum, every set is bounded below. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem OrderBot.bddBelow [OrderBot α] (s : Set α) : BddBelow s :=
⟨⊥, fun a _ => OrderBot.bot_le a⟩
/-- Sets are automatically bounded or cobounded in complete lattices. To use the same statements
in complete and conditionally complete lattices but let automation fill automatically the
boundedness proofs in complete lattices, we use the tactic `bddDefault` in the statements,
in the form `(hA : BddAbove A := by bddDefault)`. -/
macro "bddDefault" : tactic =>
`(tactic| first
| apply OrderTop.bddAbove
| apply OrderBot.bddBelow)
/-!
#### Pair
-/
theorem isLUB_pair [SemilatticeSup γ] {a b : γ} : IsLUB {a, b} (a ⊔ b) :=
isLUB_singleton.insert _
theorem isGLB_pair [SemilatticeInf γ] {a b : γ} : IsGLB {a, b} (a ⊓ b) :=
isGLB_singleton.insert _
theorem isLeast_pair [LinearOrder γ] {a b : γ} : IsLeast {a, b} (min a b) :=
isLeast_singleton.insert _
theorem isGreatest_pair [LinearOrder γ] {a b : γ} : IsGreatest {a, b} (max a b) :=
isGreatest_singleton.insert _
/-!
#### Lower/upper bounds
-/
@[simp]
theorem isLUB_lowerBounds : IsLUB (lowerBounds s) a ↔ IsGLB s a :=
⟨fun H => ⟨fun _ hx => H.2 <| subset_upperBounds_lowerBounds s hx, H.1⟩, IsGreatest.isLUB⟩
@[simp]
theorem isGLB_upperBounds : IsGLB (upperBounds s) a ↔ IsLUB s a :=
@isLUB_lowerBounds αᵒᵈ _ _ _
end
/-!
### (In)equalities with the least upper bound and the greatest lower bound
-/
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] {s : Set α} {a b : α}
theorem lowerBounds_le_upperBounds (ha : a ∈ lowerBounds s) (hb : b ∈ upperBounds s) :
s.Nonempty → a ≤ b
| ⟨_, hc⟩ => le_trans (ha hc) (hb hc)
theorem isGLB_le_isLUB (ha : IsGLB s a) (hb : IsLUB s b) (hs : s.Nonempty) : a ≤ b :=
lowerBounds_le_upperBounds ha.1 hb.1 hs
theorem isLUB_lt_iff (ha : IsLUB s a) : a < b ↔ ∃ c ∈ upperBounds s, c < b :=
⟨fun hb => ⟨a, ha.1, hb⟩, fun ⟨_, hcs, hcb⟩ => lt_of_le_of_lt (ha.2 hcs) hcb⟩
theorem lt_isGLB_iff (ha : IsGLB s a) : b < a ↔ ∃ c ∈ lowerBounds s, b < c :=
isLUB_lt_iff ha.dual
theorem le_of_isLUB_le_isGLB {x y} (ha : IsGLB s a) (hb : IsLUB s b) (hab : b ≤ a) (hx : x ∈ s)
(hy : y ∈ s) : x ≤ y :=
calc
x ≤ b := hb.1 hx
_ ≤ a := hab
_ ≤ y := ha.1 hy
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {s : Set α} {a b : α}
theorem IsLeast.unique (Ha : IsLeast s a) (Hb : IsLeast s b) : a = b :=
le_antisymm (Ha.right Hb.left) (Hb.right Ha.left)
theorem IsLeast.isLeast_iff_eq (Ha : IsLeast s a) : IsLeast s b ↔ a = b :=
Iff.intro Ha.unique fun h => h ▸ Ha
theorem IsGreatest.unique (Ha : IsGreatest s a) (Hb : IsGreatest s b) : a = b :=
le_antisymm (Hb.right Ha.left) (Ha.right Hb.left)
theorem IsGreatest.isGreatest_iff_eq (Ha : IsGreatest s a) : IsGreatest s b ↔ a = b :=
Iff.intro Ha.unique fun h => h ▸ Ha
theorem IsLUB.unique (Ha : IsLUB s a) (Hb : IsLUB s b) : a = b :=
IsLeast.unique Ha Hb
theorem IsGLB.unique (Ha : IsGLB s a) (Hb : IsGLB s b) : a = b :=
IsGreatest.unique Ha Hb
theorem Set.subsingleton_of_isLUB_le_isGLB (Ha : IsGLB s a) (Hb : IsLUB s b) (hab : b ≤ a) :
s.Subsingleton := fun _ hx _ hy =>
le_antisymm (le_of_isLUB_le_isGLB Ha Hb hab hx hy) (le_of_isLUB_le_isGLB Ha Hb hab hy hx)
theorem isGLB_lt_isLUB_of_ne (Ha : IsGLB s a) (Hb : IsLUB s b) {x y} (Hx : x ∈ s) (Hy : y ∈ s)
(Hxy : x ≠ y) : a < b :=
lt_iff_le_not_le.2
⟨lowerBounds_le_upperBounds Ha.1 Hb.1 ⟨x, Hx⟩, fun hab =>
Hxy <| Set.subsingleton_of_isLUB_le_isGLB Ha Hb hab Hx Hy⟩
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] {s : Set α} {a b : α}
theorem lt_isLUB_iff (h : IsLUB s a) : b < a ↔ ∃ c ∈ s, b < c := by
simp_rw [← not_le, isLUB_le_iff h, mem_upperBounds, not_forall, not_le, exists_prop]
theorem isGLB_lt_iff (h : IsGLB s a) : a < b ↔ ∃ c ∈ s, c < b :=
lt_isLUB_iff h.dual
theorem IsLUB.exists_between (h : IsLUB s a) (hb : b < a) : ∃ c ∈ s, b < c ∧ c ≤ a :=
let ⟨c, hcs, hbc⟩ := (lt_isLUB_iff h).1 hb
⟨c, hcs, hbc, h.1 hcs⟩
theorem IsLUB.exists_between' (h : IsLUB s a) (h' : a ∉ s) (hb : b < a) : ∃ c ∈ s, b < c ∧ c < a :=
let ⟨c, hcs, hbc, hca⟩ := h.exists_between hb
⟨c, hcs, hbc, hca.lt_of_ne fun hac => h' <| hac ▸ hcs⟩
theorem IsGLB.exists_between (h : IsGLB s a) (hb : a < b) : ∃ c ∈ s, a ≤ c ∧ c < b :=
let ⟨c, hcs, hbc⟩ := (isGLB_lt_iff h).1 hb
⟨c, hcs, h.1 hcs, hbc⟩
theorem IsGLB.exists_between' (h : IsGLB s a) (h' : a ∉ s) (hb : a < b) : ∃ c ∈ s, a < c ∧ c < b :=
let ⟨c, hcs, hac, hcb⟩ := h.exists_between hb
⟨c, hcs, hac.lt_of_ne fun hac => h' <| hac.symm ▸ hcs, hcb⟩
end LinearOrder
theorem isGreatest_himp [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] (a b : α) :
IsGreatest {w | w ⊓ a ≤ b} (a ⇨ b) := by
simp [IsGreatest, mem_upperBounds]
theorem isLeast_sdiff [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] (a b : α) :
IsLeast {w | a ≤ b ⊔ w} (a \ b) := by
simp [IsLeast, mem_lowerBounds]
theorem isGreatest_compl [HeytingAlgebra α] (a : α) :
IsGreatest {w | Disjoint w a} (aᶜ) := by
simpa only [himp_bot, disjoint_iff_inf_le] using isGreatest_himp a ⊥
theorem isLeast_hnot [CoheytingAlgebra α] (a : α) :
IsLeast {w | Codisjoint a w} (￢a) := by
simpa only [CoheytingAlgebra.top_sdiff, codisjoint_iff_le_sup] using isLeast_sdiff ⊤ a
| Mathlib/Order/Bounds/Basic.lean | 1,588 | 1,590 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Violeta Hernández Palacios. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.Order.RelClasses
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
/-!
# Bounded and unbounded sets
We prove miscellaneous lemmas about bounded and unbounded sets. Many of these are just variations on
the same ideas, or similar results with a few minor differences. The file is divided into these
different general ideas.
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
namespace Set
variable {α : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop} {s t : Set α}
/-! ### Subsets of bounded and unbounded sets -/
theorem Bounded.mono (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : Bounded r t) : Bounded r s :=
hs.imp fun _ ha b hb => ha b (hst hb)
theorem Unbounded.mono (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : Unbounded r s) : Unbounded r t := fun a =>
let ⟨b, hb, hb'⟩ := hs a
⟨b, hst hb, hb'⟩
/-! ### Alternate characterizations of unboundedness on orders -/
theorem unbounded_le_of_forall_exists_lt [Preorder α] (h : ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ s, a < b) :
Unbounded (· ≤ ·) s := fun a =>
let ⟨b, hb, hb'⟩ := h a
⟨b, hb, fun hba => hba.not_lt hb'⟩
theorem unbounded_le_iff [LinearOrder α] : Unbounded (· ≤ ·) s ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ s, a < b := by
simp only [Unbounded, not_le]
theorem unbounded_lt_of_forall_exists_le [Preorder α] (h : ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ s, a ≤ b) :
Unbounded (· < ·) s := fun a =>
let ⟨b, hb, hb'⟩ := h a
⟨b, hb, fun hba => hba.not_le hb'⟩
theorem unbounded_lt_iff [LinearOrder α] : Unbounded (· < ·) s ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ s, a ≤ b := by
simp only [Unbounded, not_lt]
theorem unbounded_ge_of_forall_exists_gt [Preorder α] (h : ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ s, b < a) :
Unbounded (· ≥ ·) s :=
@unbounded_le_of_forall_exists_lt αᵒᵈ _ _ h
theorem unbounded_ge_iff [LinearOrder α] : Unbounded (· ≥ ·) s ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ s, b < a :=
⟨fun h a =>
let ⟨b, hb, hba⟩ := h a
⟨b, hb, lt_of_not_ge hba⟩,
unbounded_ge_of_forall_exists_gt⟩
theorem unbounded_gt_of_forall_exists_ge [Preorder α] (h : ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ s, b ≤ a) :
Unbounded (· > ·) s := fun a =>
let ⟨b, hb, hb'⟩ := h a
⟨b, hb, fun hba => not_le_of_gt hba hb'⟩
theorem unbounded_gt_iff [LinearOrder α] : Unbounded (· > ·) s ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ s, b ≤ a :=
⟨fun h a =>
let ⟨b, hb, hba⟩ := h a
⟨b, hb, le_of_not_gt hba⟩,
unbounded_gt_of_forall_exists_ge⟩
/-! ### Relation between boundedness by strict and nonstrict orders. -/
/-! #### Less and less or equal -/
theorem Bounded.rel_mono {r' : α → α → Prop} (h : Bounded r s) (hrr' : r ≤ r') : Bounded r' s :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := h
⟨a, fun b hb => hrr' b a (ha b hb)⟩
theorem bounded_le_of_bounded_lt [Preorder α] (h : Bounded (· < ·) s) : Bounded (· ≤ ·) s :=
h.rel_mono fun _ _ => le_of_lt
theorem Unbounded.rel_mono {r' : α → α → Prop} (hr : r' ≤ r) (h : Unbounded r s) : Unbounded r' s :=
fun a =>
let ⟨b, hb, hba⟩ := h a
⟨b, hb, fun hba' => hba (hr b a hba')⟩
theorem unbounded_lt_of_unbounded_le [Preorder α] (h : Unbounded (· ≤ ·) s) : Unbounded (· < ·) s :=
h.rel_mono fun _ _ => le_of_lt
theorem bounded_le_iff_bounded_lt [Preorder α] [NoMaxOrder α] :
Bounded (· ≤ ·) s ↔ Bounded (· < ·) s := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, bounded_le_of_bounded_lt⟩
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := h
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := exists_gt a
exact ⟨b, fun c hc => lt_of_le_of_lt (ha c hc) hb⟩
theorem unbounded_lt_iff_unbounded_le [Preorder α] [NoMaxOrder α] :
Unbounded (· < ·) s ↔ Unbounded (· ≤ ·) s := by
simp_rw [← not_bounded_iff, bounded_le_iff_bounded_lt]
/-! #### Greater and greater or equal -/
theorem bounded_ge_of_bounded_gt [Preorder α] (h : Bounded (· > ·) s) : Bounded (· ≥ ·) s :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := h
⟨a, fun b hb => le_of_lt (ha b hb)⟩
theorem unbounded_gt_of_unbounded_ge [Preorder α] (h : Unbounded (· ≥ ·) s) : Unbounded (· > ·) s :=
fun a =>
let ⟨b, hb, hba⟩ := h a
⟨b, hb, fun hba' => hba (le_of_lt hba')⟩
theorem bounded_ge_iff_bounded_gt [Preorder α] [NoMinOrder α] :
Bounded (· ≥ ·) s ↔ Bounded (· > ·) s :=
@bounded_le_iff_bounded_lt αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem unbounded_gt_iff_unbounded_ge [Preorder α] [NoMinOrder α] :
Unbounded (· > ·) s ↔ Unbounded (· ≥ ·) s :=
@unbounded_lt_iff_unbounded_le αᵒᵈ _ _ _
/-! ### The universal set -/
theorem unbounded_le_univ [LE α] [NoTopOrder α] : Unbounded (· ≤ ·) (@Set.univ α) := fun a =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := exists_not_le a
⟨b, ⟨⟩, hb⟩
theorem unbounded_lt_univ [Preorder α] [NoTopOrder α] : Unbounded (· < ·) (@Set.univ α) :=
unbounded_lt_of_unbounded_le unbounded_le_univ
theorem unbounded_ge_univ [LE α] [NoBotOrder α] : Unbounded (· ≥ ·) (@Set.univ α) := fun a =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := exists_not_ge a
⟨b, ⟨⟩, hb⟩
theorem unbounded_gt_univ [Preorder α] [NoBotOrder α] : Unbounded (· > ·) (@Set.univ α) :=
unbounded_gt_of_unbounded_ge unbounded_ge_univ
/-! ### Bounded and unbounded intervals -/
theorem bounded_self (a : α) : Bounded r { b | r b a } :=
⟨a, fun _ => id⟩
/-! #### Half-open bounded intervals -/
theorem bounded_lt_Iio [Preorder α] (a : α) : Bounded (· < ·) (Iio a) :=
bounded_self a
theorem bounded_le_Iio [Preorder α] (a : α) : Bounded (· ≤ ·) (Iio a) :=
bounded_le_of_bounded_lt (bounded_lt_Iio a)
theorem bounded_le_Iic [Preorder α] (a : α) : Bounded (· ≤ ·) (Iic a) :=
bounded_self a
theorem bounded_lt_Iic [Preorder α] [NoMaxOrder α] (a : α) : Bounded (· < ·) (Iic a) := by
simp only [← bounded_le_iff_bounded_lt, bounded_le_Iic]
theorem bounded_gt_Ioi [Preorder α] (a : α) : Bounded (· > ·) (Ioi a) :=
bounded_self a
theorem bounded_ge_Ioi [Preorder α] (a : α) : Bounded (· ≥ ·) (Ioi a) :=
bounded_ge_of_bounded_gt (bounded_gt_Ioi a)
theorem bounded_ge_Ici [Preorder α] (a : α) : Bounded (· ≥ ·) (Ici a) :=
bounded_self a
theorem bounded_gt_Ici [Preorder α] [NoMinOrder α] (a : α) : Bounded (· > ·) (Ici a) := by
simp only [← bounded_ge_iff_bounded_gt, bounded_ge_Ici]
/-! #### Other bounded intervals -/
theorem bounded_lt_Ioo [Preorder α] (a b : α) : Bounded (· < ·) (Ioo a b) :=
(bounded_lt_Iio b).mono Set.Ioo_subset_Iio_self
theorem bounded_lt_Ico [Preorder α] (a b : α) : Bounded (· < ·) (Ico a b) :=
(bounded_lt_Iio b).mono Set.Ico_subset_Iio_self
theorem bounded_lt_Ioc [Preorder α] [NoMaxOrder α] (a b : α) : Bounded (· < ·) (Ioc a b) :=
(bounded_lt_Iic b).mono Set.Ioc_subset_Iic_self
theorem bounded_lt_Icc [Preorder α] [NoMaxOrder α] (a b : α) : Bounded (· < ·) (Icc a b) :=
(bounded_lt_Iic b).mono Set.Icc_subset_Iic_self
theorem bounded_le_Ioo [Preorder α] (a b : α) : Bounded (· ≤ ·) (Ioo a b) :=
(bounded_le_Iio b).mono Set.Ioo_subset_Iio_self
theorem bounded_le_Ico [Preorder α] (a b : α) : Bounded (· ≤ ·) (Ico a b) :=
(bounded_le_Iio b).mono Set.Ico_subset_Iio_self
theorem bounded_le_Ioc [Preorder α] (a b : α) : Bounded (· ≤ ·) (Ioc a b) :=
(bounded_le_Iic b).mono Set.Ioc_subset_Iic_self
theorem bounded_le_Icc [Preorder α] (a b : α) : Bounded (· ≤ ·) (Icc a b) :=
(bounded_le_Iic b).mono Set.Icc_subset_Iic_self
theorem bounded_gt_Ioo [Preorder α] (a b : α) : Bounded (· > ·) (Ioo a b) :=
(bounded_gt_Ioi a).mono Set.Ioo_subset_Ioi_self
theorem bounded_gt_Ioc [Preorder α] (a b : α) : Bounded (· > ·) (Ioc a b) :=
(bounded_gt_Ioi a).mono Set.Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
theorem bounded_gt_Ico [Preorder α] [NoMinOrder α] (a b : α) : Bounded (· > ·) (Ico a b) :=
(bounded_gt_Ici a).mono Set.Ico_subset_Ici_self
theorem bounded_gt_Icc [Preorder α] [NoMinOrder α] (a b : α) : Bounded (· > ·) (Icc a b) :=
(bounded_gt_Ici a).mono Set.Icc_subset_Ici_self
theorem bounded_ge_Ioo [Preorder α] (a b : α) : Bounded (· ≥ ·) (Ioo a b) :=
(bounded_ge_Ioi a).mono Set.Ioo_subset_Ioi_self
theorem bounded_ge_Ioc [Preorder α] (a b : α) : Bounded (· ≥ ·) (Ioc a b) :=
(bounded_ge_Ioi a).mono Set.Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
theorem bounded_ge_Ico [Preorder α] (a b : α) : Bounded (· ≥ ·) (Ico a b) :=
(bounded_ge_Ici a).mono Set.Ico_subset_Ici_self
theorem bounded_ge_Icc [Preorder α] (a b : α) : Bounded (· ≥ ·) (Icc a b) :=
(bounded_ge_Ici a).mono Set.Icc_subset_Ici_self
/-! #### Unbounded intervals -/
theorem unbounded_le_Ioi [SemilatticeSup α] [NoMaxOrder α] (a : α) :
Unbounded (· ≤ ·) (Ioi a) := fun b =>
let ⟨c, hc⟩ := exists_gt (a ⊔ b)
⟨c, le_sup_left.trans_lt hc, (le_sup_right.trans_lt hc).not_le⟩
theorem unbounded_le_Ici [SemilatticeSup α] [NoMaxOrder α] (a : α) :
Unbounded (· ≤ ·) (Ici a) :=
(unbounded_le_Ioi a).mono Set.Ioi_subset_Ici_self
theorem unbounded_lt_Ioi [SemilatticeSup α] [NoMaxOrder α] (a : α) :
Unbounded (· < ·) (Ioi a) :=
unbounded_lt_of_unbounded_le (unbounded_le_Ioi a)
theorem unbounded_lt_Ici [SemilatticeSup α] (a : α) : Unbounded (· < ·) (Ici a) := fun b =>
⟨a ⊔ b, le_sup_left, le_sup_right.not_lt⟩
/-! ### Bounded initial segments -/
theorem bounded_inter_not (H : ∀ a b, ∃ m, ∀ c, r c a ∨ r c b → r c m) (a : α) :
Bounded r (s ∩ { b | ¬r b a }) ↔ Bounded r s := by
refine ⟨?_, Bounded.mono inter_subset_left⟩
rintro ⟨b, hb⟩
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := H a b
exact ⟨m, fun c hc => hm c (or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun hca => hb c ⟨hc, hca⟩)⟩
theorem unbounded_inter_not (H : ∀ a b, ∃ m, ∀ c, r c a ∨ r c b → r c m) (a : α) :
Unbounded r (s ∩ { b | ¬r b a }) ↔ Unbounded r s := by
simp_rw [← not_bounded_iff, bounded_inter_not H]
/-! #### Less or equal -/
theorem bounded_le_inter_not_le [SemilatticeSup α] (a : α) :
Bounded (· ≤ ·) (s ∩ { b | ¬b ≤ a }) ↔ Bounded (· ≤ ·) s :=
bounded_inter_not (fun x y => ⟨x ⊔ y, fun _ h => h.elim le_sup_of_le_left le_sup_of_le_right⟩) a
theorem unbounded_le_inter_not_le [SemilatticeSup α] (a : α) :
Unbounded (· ≤ ·) (s ∩ { b | ¬b ≤ a }) ↔ Unbounded (· ≤ ·) s := by
rw [← not_bounded_iff, ← not_bounded_iff, not_iff_not]
exact bounded_le_inter_not_le a
theorem bounded_le_inter_lt [LinearOrder α] (a : α) :
Bounded (· ≤ ·) (s ∩ { b | a < b }) ↔ Bounded (· ≤ ·) s := by
simp_rw [← not_le, bounded_le_inter_not_le]
theorem unbounded_le_inter_lt [LinearOrder α] (a : α) :
Unbounded (· ≤ ·) (s ∩ { b | a < b }) ↔ Unbounded (· ≤ ·) s := by
convert @unbounded_le_inter_not_le _ s _ a
exact lt_iff_not_le
theorem bounded_le_inter_le [LinearOrder α] (a : α) :
Bounded (· ≤ ·) (s ∩ { b | a ≤ b }) ↔ Bounded (· ≤ ·) s := by
refine ⟨?_, Bounded.mono Set.inter_subset_left⟩
rw [← @bounded_le_inter_lt _ s _ a]
exact Bounded.mono fun x ⟨hx, hx'⟩ => ⟨hx, le_of_lt hx'⟩
theorem unbounded_le_inter_le [LinearOrder α] (a : α) :
Unbounded (· ≤ ·) (s ∩ { b | a ≤ b }) ↔ Unbounded (· ≤ ·) s := by
rw [← not_bounded_iff, ← not_bounded_iff, not_iff_not]
exact bounded_le_inter_le a
/-! #### Less than -/
theorem bounded_lt_inter_not_lt [SemilatticeSup α] (a : α) :
Bounded (· < ·) (s ∩ { b | ¬b < a }) ↔ Bounded (· < ·) s :=
bounded_inter_not (fun x y => ⟨x ⊔ y, fun _ h => h.elim lt_sup_of_lt_left lt_sup_of_lt_right⟩) a
theorem unbounded_lt_inter_not_lt [SemilatticeSup α] (a : α) :
Unbounded (· < ·) (s ∩ { b | ¬b < a }) ↔ Unbounded (· < ·) s := by
rw [← not_bounded_iff, ← not_bounded_iff, not_iff_not]
exact bounded_lt_inter_not_lt a
theorem bounded_lt_inter_le [LinearOrder α] (a : α) :
Bounded (· < ·) (s ∩ { b | a ≤ b }) ↔ Bounded (· < ·) s := by
convert @bounded_lt_inter_not_lt _ s _ a
exact not_lt.symm
theorem unbounded_lt_inter_le [LinearOrder α] (a : α) :
Unbounded (· < ·) (s ∩ { b | a ≤ b }) ↔ Unbounded (· < ·) s := by
convert @unbounded_lt_inter_not_lt _ s _ a
exact not_lt.symm
theorem bounded_lt_inter_lt [LinearOrder α] [NoMaxOrder α] (a : α) :
Bounded (· < ·) (s ∩ { b | a < b }) ↔ Bounded (· < ·) s := by
rw [← bounded_le_iff_bounded_lt, ← bounded_le_iff_bounded_lt]
exact bounded_le_inter_lt a
theorem unbounded_lt_inter_lt [LinearOrder α] [NoMaxOrder α] (a : α) :
Unbounded (· < ·) (s ∩ { b | a < b }) ↔ Unbounded (· < ·) s := by
rw [← not_bounded_iff, ← not_bounded_iff, not_iff_not]
exact bounded_lt_inter_lt a
/-! #### Greater or equal -/
theorem bounded_ge_inter_not_ge [SemilatticeInf α] (a : α) :
Bounded (· ≥ ·) (s ∩ { b | ¬a ≤ b }) ↔ Bounded (· ≥ ·) s :=
@bounded_le_inter_not_le αᵒᵈ s _ a
|
theorem unbounded_ge_inter_not_ge [SemilatticeInf α] (a : α) :
Unbounded (· ≥ ·) (s ∩ { b | ¬a ≤ b }) ↔ Unbounded (· ≥ ·) s :=
| Mathlib/Order/Bounded.lean | 328 | 330 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Jireh Loreaux. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jireh Loreaux
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Star.Basic
/-!
# Commutative star-ordered rings are ordered rings
A noncommutative star-ordered ring is generally not an ordered ring. Indeed, in a star-ordered
ring, nonnegative elements are self-adjoint, but the product of self-adjoint elements is
self-adjoint if and only if they commute. Therefore, a necessary condition for a star-ordered ring
to be an ordered ring is that all nonnegative elements commute. Consequently, if a star-ordered
ring is spanned by it nonnegative elements (as is the case for C⋆-algebras) and it is also an
ordered ring, then it is commutative.
In this file we prove the converse: a *commutative* star-ordered ring is an ordered ring.
-/
namespace StarOrderedRing
/- This example shows that nonnegative elements in a ordered semiring which is also star-ordered
must commute. We provide this only as an example as opposed to a lemma because we never expect the
type class assumptions to be satisfied without a `CommSemiring` instance already in scope; not that
it is impossible, only that it shouldn't occur in practice. -/
example {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]
[StarRing R] [StarOrderedRing R] {x y : R} (hx : 0 ≤ x)
(hy : 0 ≤ y) : x * y = y * x := by
rw [← IsSelfAdjoint.of_nonneg (mul_nonneg hy hx), star_mul, IsSelfAdjoint.of_nonneg hx,
IsSelfAdjoint.of_nonneg hy]
/- This will be implied by the instance below, we only prove it to avoid duplicating the
| argument in the instance below for `mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right`. -/
private lemma mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left {R : Type*} [NonUnitalCommSemiring R] [PartialOrder R]
[StarRing R] [StarOrderedRing R] {a b c : R} (hab : a ≤ b) (hc : 0 ≤ c) : c * a ≤ c * b := by
rw [StarOrderedRing.nonneg_iff] at hc
induction hc using AddSubmonoid.closure_induction with
| mem _ h =>
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := h
simp_rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm x, ← mul_assoc]
exact conjugate_le_conjugate hab x
| one => simp
| mul x hx y hy =>
simp only [← nonneg_iff, add_mul] at hx hy ⊢
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Ring/Star.lean | 35 | 46 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Kevin Buzzard, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Lattice
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Membership
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Equiv.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.PUnit
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Lattice.Fold
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Basic
/-!
# The lattice structure on `Submodule`s
This file defines the lattice structure on submodules, `Submodule.CompleteLattice`, with `⊥`
defined as `{0}` and `⊓` defined as intersection of the underlying carrier.
If `p` and `q` are submodules of a module, `p ≤ q` means that `p ⊆ q`.
Many results about operations on this lattice structure are defined in `LinearAlgebra/Basic.lean`,
most notably those which use `span`.
## Implementation notes
This structure should match the `AddSubmonoid.CompleteLattice` structure, and we should try
to unify the APIs where possible.
-/
universe v
variable {R S M : Type*}
section AddCommMonoid
variable [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [Module S M]
variable [SMul S R] [IsScalarTower S R M]
variable {p q : Submodule R M}
namespace Submodule
/-!
## Bottom element of a submodule
-/
/-- The set `{0}` is the bottom element of the lattice of submodules. -/
instance : Bot (Submodule R M) :=
⟨{ (⊥ : AddSubmonoid M) with
carrier := {0}
smul_mem' := by simp }⟩
instance inhabited' : Inhabited (Submodule R M) :=
⟨⊥⟩
@[simp]
theorem bot_coe : ((⊥ : Submodule R M) : Set M) = {0} :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bot_toAddSubmonoid : (⊥ : Submodule R M).toAddSubmonoid = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma bot_toAddSubgroup {R M} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] :
(⊥ : Submodule R M).toAddSubgroup = ⊥ := rfl
variable (R) in
@[simp]
theorem mem_bot {x : M} : x ∈ (⊥ : Submodule R M) ↔ x = 0 :=
Set.mem_singleton_iff
instance uniqueBot : Unique (⊥ : Submodule R M) :=
⟨inferInstance, fun x ↦ Subtype.ext <| (mem_bot R).1 x.mem⟩
instance : OrderBot (Submodule R M) where
bot := ⊥
bot_le p x := by simp +contextual [zero_mem]
protected theorem eq_bot_iff (p : Submodule R M) : p = ⊥ ↔ ∀ x ∈ p, x = (0 : M) :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.symm ▸ fun _ hx ↦ (mem_bot R).mp hx,
fun h ↦ eq_bot_iff.mpr fun x hx ↦ (mem_bot R).mpr (h x hx)⟩
@[ext high]
protected theorem bot_ext (x y : (⊥ : Submodule R M)) : x = y := by
rcases x with ⟨x, xm⟩; rcases y with ⟨y, ym⟩; congr
rw [(Submodule.eq_bot_iff _).mp rfl x xm]
rw [(Submodule.eq_bot_iff _).mp rfl y ym]
protected theorem ne_bot_iff (p : Submodule R M) : p ≠ ⊥ ↔ ∃ x ∈ p, x ≠ (0 : M) := by
simp only [ne_eq, p.eq_bot_iff, not_forall, exists_prop]
theorem nonzero_mem_of_bot_lt {p : Submodule R M} (bot_lt : ⊥ < p) : ∃ a : p, a ≠ 0 :=
let ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩ := p.ne_bot_iff.mp bot_lt.ne'
⟨⟨b, hb₁⟩, hb₂ ∘ congr_arg Subtype.val⟩
theorem exists_mem_ne_zero_of_ne_bot {p : Submodule R M} (h : p ≠ ⊥) : ∃ b : M, b ∈ p ∧ b ≠ 0 :=
let ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩ := p.ne_bot_iff.mp h
⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩
-- FIXME: we default PUnit to PUnit.{1} here without the explicit universe annotation
/-- The bottom submodule is linearly equivalent to punit as an `R`-module. -/
@[simps]
def botEquivPUnit : (⊥ : Submodule R M) ≃ₗ[R] PUnit.{v+1} where
toFun _ := PUnit.unit
invFun _ := 0
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
left_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
right_inv _ := rfl
theorem subsingleton_iff_eq_bot : Subsingleton p ↔ p = ⊥ := by
rw [subsingleton_iff, Submodule.eq_bot_iff]
refine ⟨fun h x hx ↦ by simpa using h ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨0, p.zero_mem⟩,
fun h ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ ↦ by simp [h x hx, h y hy]⟩
theorem eq_bot_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton p] : p = ⊥ :=
subsingleton_iff_eq_bot.mp inferInstance
theorem nontrivial_iff_ne_bot : Nontrivial p ↔ p ≠ ⊥ := by
rw [iff_not_comm, not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton, subsingleton_iff_eq_bot]
/-!
## Top element of a submodule
-/
/-- The universal set is the top element of the lattice of submodules. -/
instance : Top (Submodule R M) :=
⟨{ (⊤ : AddSubmonoid M) with
carrier := Set.univ
smul_mem' := fun _ _ _ ↦ trivial }⟩
@[simp]
theorem top_coe : ((⊤ : Submodule R M) : Set M) = Set.univ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_toAddSubmonoid : (⊤ : Submodule R M).toAddSubmonoid = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma top_toAddSubgroup {R M} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] :
(⊤ : Submodule R M).toAddSubgroup = ⊤ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_top {x : M} : x ∈ (⊤ : Submodule R M) :=
trivial
instance : OrderTop (Submodule R M) where
top := ⊤
le_top _ _ _ := trivial
theorem eq_top_iff' {p : Submodule R M} : p = ⊤ ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ p :=
eq_top_iff.trans ⟨fun h _ ↦ h trivial, fun h x _ ↦ h x⟩
/-- The top submodule is linearly equivalent to the module.
This is the module version of `AddSubmonoid.topEquiv`. -/
@[simps]
def topEquiv : (⊤ : Submodule R M) ≃ₗ[R] M where
toFun x := x
invFun x := ⟨x, mem_top⟩
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
/-!
## Infima & suprema in a submodule
-/
instance : InfSet (Submodule R M) :=
⟨fun S ↦
{ carrier := ⋂ s ∈ S, (s : Set M)
zero_mem' := by simp [zero_mem]
add_mem' := by simp +contextual [add_mem]
smul_mem' := by simp +contextual [smul_mem] }⟩
private theorem sInf_le' {S : Set (Submodule R M)} {p} : p ∈ S → sInf S ≤ p :=
Set.biInter_subset_of_mem
private theorem le_sInf' {S : Set (Submodule R M)} {p} : (∀ q ∈ S, p ≤ q) → p ≤ sInf S :=
Set.subset_iInter₂
instance : Min (Submodule R M) :=
⟨fun p q ↦
{ carrier := p ∩ q
zero_mem' := by simp [zero_mem]
add_mem' := by simp +contextual [add_mem]
smul_mem' := by simp +contextual [smul_mem] }⟩
instance completeLattice : CompleteLattice (Submodule R M) :=
{ (inferInstance : OrderTop (Submodule R M)),
(inferInstance : OrderBot (Submodule R M)) with
sup := fun a b ↦ sInf { x | a ≤ x ∧ b ≤ x }
le_sup_left := fun _ _ ↦ le_sInf' fun _ ⟨h, _⟩ ↦ h
le_sup_right := fun _ _ ↦ le_sInf' fun _ ⟨_, h⟩ ↦ h
sup_le := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ ↦ sInf_le' ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
le_inf := fun _ _ _ ↦ Set.subset_inter
inf_le_left := fun _ _ ↦ Set.inter_subset_left
inf_le_right := fun _ _ ↦ Set.inter_subset_right
sSup S := sInf {sm | ∀ s ∈ S, s ≤ sm}
le_sSup := fun _ _ hs ↦ le_sInf' fun _ hq ↦ by exact hq _ hs
sSup_le := fun _ _ hs ↦ sInf_le' hs
le_sInf := fun _ _ ↦ le_sInf'
sInf_le := fun _ _ ↦ sInf_le' }
@[simp]
theorem inf_coe : ↑(p ⊓ q) = (p ∩ q : Set M) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_inf {p q : Submodule R M} {x : M} : x ∈ p ⊓ q ↔ x ∈ p ∧ x ∈ q :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem sInf_coe (P : Set (Submodule R M)) : (↑(sInf P) : Set M) = ⋂ p ∈ P, ↑p :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem finset_inf_coe {ι} (s : Finset ι) (p : ι → Submodule R M) :
(↑(s.inf p) : Set M) = ⋂ i ∈ s, ↑(p i) := by
letI := Classical.decEq ι
refine s.induction_on ?_ fun i s _ ih ↦ ?_
· simp
· rw [Finset.inf_insert, inf_coe, ih]
simp
@[simp]
theorem iInf_coe {ι} (p : ι → Submodule R M) : (↑(⨅ i, p i) : Set M) = ⋂ i, ↑(p i) := by
rw [iInf, sInf_coe]; simp only [Set.mem_range, Set.iInter_exists, Set.iInter_iInter_eq']
@[simp]
theorem mem_sInf {S : Set (Submodule R M)} {x : M} : x ∈ sInf S ↔ ∀ p ∈ S, x ∈ p :=
Set.mem_iInter₂
@[simp]
theorem mem_iInf {ι} (p : ι → Submodule R M) {x} : (x ∈ ⨅ i, p i) ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ p i := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, iInf_coe, Set.mem_iInter]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_finset_inf {ι} {s : Finset ι} {p : ι → Submodule R M} {x : M} :
x ∈ s.inf p ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, x ∈ p i := by
simp only [← SetLike.mem_coe, finset_inf_coe, Set.mem_iInter]
lemma inf_iInf {ι : Type*} [Nonempty ι] {p : ι → Submodule R M} (q : Submodule R M) :
q ⊓ ⨅ i, p i = ⨅ i, q ⊓ p i :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by simpa only [inf_coe, iInf_coe] using Set.inter_iInter _ _
theorem mem_sup_left {S T : Submodule R M} : ∀ {x : M}, x ∈ S → x ∈ S ⊔ T := by
have : S ≤ S ⊔ T := le_sup_left
rw [LE.le] at this
exact this
theorem mem_sup_right {S T : Submodule R M} : ∀ {x : M}, x ∈ T → x ∈ S ⊔ T := by
have : T ≤ S ⊔ T := le_sup_right
rw [LE.le] at this
exact this
theorem add_mem_sup {S T : Submodule R M} {s t : M} (hs : s ∈ S) (ht : t ∈ T) : s + t ∈ S ⊔ T :=
add_mem (mem_sup_left hs) (mem_sup_right ht)
theorem sub_mem_sup {R' M' : Type*} [Ring R'] [AddCommGroup M'] [Module R' M']
{S T : Submodule R' M'} {s t : M'} (hs : s ∈ S) (ht : t ∈ T) : s - t ∈ S ⊔ T := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
exact add_mem_sup hs (neg_mem ht)
theorem mem_iSup_of_mem {ι : Sort*} {b : M} {p : ι → Submodule R M} (i : ι) (h : b ∈ p i) :
b ∈ ⨆ i, p i :=
(le_iSup p i) h
theorem sum_mem_iSup {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {f : ι → M} {p : ι → Submodule R M}
(h : ∀ i, f i ∈ p i) : (∑ i, f i) ∈ ⨆ i, p i :=
sum_mem fun i _ ↦ mem_iSup_of_mem i (h i)
theorem sum_mem_biSup {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → M} {p : ι → Submodule R M}
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ∈ p i) : (∑ i ∈ s, f i) ∈ ⨆ i ∈ s, p i :=
sum_mem fun i hi ↦ mem_iSup_of_mem i <| mem_iSup_of_mem hi (h i hi)
/-! Note that `Submodule.mem_iSup` is provided in `Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Span.lean`. -/
theorem mem_sSup_of_mem {S : Set (Submodule R M)} {s : Submodule R M} (hs : s ∈ S) :
∀ {x : M}, x ∈ s → x ∈ sSup S := by
| have := le_sSup hs
rw [LE.le] at this
exact this
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/Submodule/Lattice.lean | 288 | 291 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.FreeAlgebra
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Adjoin.Polynomial
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Adjoin.Tower
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Operations
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Noetherian.Orzech
/-!
# Finiteness conditions in commutative algebra
In this file we define a notion of finiteness that is common in commutative algebra.
## Main declarations
- `Algebra.FiniteType`, `RingHom.FiniteType`, `AlgHom.FiniteType`
all of these express that some object is finitely generated *as algebra* over some base ring.
-/
open Function (Surjective)
open Polynomial
section ModuleAndAlgebra
universe uR uS uA uB uM uN
variable (R : Type uR) (S : Type uS) (A : Type uA) (B : Type uB) (M : Type uM) (N : Type uN)
/-- An algebra over a commutative semiring is of `FiniteType` if it is finitely generated
over the base ring as algebra. -/
class Algebra.FiniteType [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] : Prop where
out : (⊤ : Subalgebra R A).FG
namespace Module
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
namespace Finite
open Submodule Set
variable {R S M N}
section Algebra
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) finiteType {R : Type*} (A : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A]
[Algebra R A] [hRA : Module.Finite R A] : Algebra.FiniteType R A :=
⟨Subalgebra.fg_of_submodule_fg hRA.1⟩
end Algebra
end Finite
end Module
namespace Algebra
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Semiring A] [Semiring B]
variable [Algebra R S] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
namespace FiniteType
theorem self : FiniteType R R :=
⟨⟨{1}, Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩⟩
protected theorem polynomial : FiniteType R R[X] :=
⟨⟨{Polynomial.X}, by
rw [Finset.coe_singleton]
exact Polynomial.adjoin_X⟩⟩
protected theorem freeAlgebra (ι : Type*) [Finite ι] : FiniteType R (FreeAlgebra R ι) := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
classical
exact
⟨⟨Finset.univ.image (FreeAlgebra.ι R), by
rw [Finset.coe_image, Finset.coe_univ, Set.image_univ]
exact FreeAlgebra.adjoin_range_ι R ι⟩⟩
protected theorem mvPolynomial (ι : Type*) [Finite ι] : FiniteType R (MvPolynomial ι R) := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
classical
exact
⟨⟨Finset.univ.image MvPolynomial.X, by
rw [Finset.coe_image, Finset.coe_univ, Set.image_univ]
exact MvPolynomial.adjoin_range_X⟩⟩
theorem of_restrictScalars_finiteType [Algebra S A] [IsScalarTower R S A] [hA : FiniteType R A] :
FiniteType S A := by
obtain ⟨s, hS⟩ := hA.out
refine ⟨⟨s, eq_top_iff.2 fun b => ?_⟩⟩
have le : adjoin R (s : Set A) ≤ Subalgebra.restrictScalars R (adjoin S s) := by
apply (Algebra.adjoin_le _ : adjoin R (s : Set A) ≤ Subalgebra.restrictScalars R (adjoin S ↑s))
simp only [Subalgebra.coe_restrictScalars]
exact Algebra.subset_adjoin
exact le (eq_top_iff.1 hS b)
variable {R S A B}
theorem of_surjective (hRA : FiniteType R A) (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (hf : Surjective f) : FiniteType R B :=
⟨by
convert hRA.1.map f
simpa only [map_top f, @eq_comm _ ⊤, eq_top_iff, AlgHom.mem_range] using hf⟩
theorem equiv (hRA : FiniteType R A) (e : A ≃ₐ[R] B) : FiniteType R B :=
hRA.of_surjective e e.surjective
theorem trans [Algebra S A] [IsScalarTower R S A] (hRS : FiniteType R S) (hSA : FiniteType S A) :
FiniteType R A :=
⟨fg_trans' hRS.1 hSA.1⟩
instance quotient (R : Type*) {S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommRing S] [Algebra R S] (I : Ideal S)
[h : Algebra.FiniteType R S] : Algebra.FiniteType R (S ⧸ I) :=
Algebra.FiniteType.trans h inferInstance
/-- An algebra is finitely generated if and only if it is a quotient
of a free algebra whose variables are indexed by a finset. -/
theorem iff_quotient_freeAlgebra :
FiniteType R A ↔
∃ (s : Finset A) (f : FreeAlgebra R s →ₐ[R] A), Surjective f := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨s, hs⟩
refine ⟨s, FreeAlgebra.lift _ (↑), ?_⟩
rw [← Set.range_eq_univ, ← AlgHom.coe_range, ← adjoin_range_eq_range_freeAlgebra_lift,
Subtype.range_coe_subtype, Finset.setOf_mem, hs, coe_top]
· rintro ⟨s, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩
exact FiniteType.of_surjective (FiniteType.freeAlgebra R s) f hsur
/-- A commutative algebra is finitely generated if and only if it is a quotient
of a polynomial ring whose variables are indexed by a finset. -/
theorem iff_quotient_mvPolynomial :
FiniteType R S ↔
∃ (s : Finset S) (f : MvPolynomial { x // x ∈ s } R →ₐ[R] S), Surjective f := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨s, hs⟩
use s, MvPolynomial.aeval (↑)
intro x
have hrw : (↑s : Set S) = fun x : S => x ∈ s.val := rfl
rw [← Set.mem_range, ← AlgHom.coe_range, ← adjoin_eq_range]
simp_rw [← hrw, hs]
exact Set.mem_univ x
· rintro ⟨s, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩
exact FiniteType.of_surjective (FiniteType.mvPolynomial R { x // x ∈ s }) f hsur
/-- An algebra is finitely generated if and only if it is a quotient
of a polynomial ring whose variables are indexed by a fintype. -/
theorem iff_quotient_freeAlgebra' : FiniteType R A ↔
∃ (ι : Type uA) (_ : Fintype ι) (f : FreeAlgebra R ι →ₐ[R] A), Surjective f := by
constructor
· rw [iff_quotient_freeAlgebra]
rintro ⟨s, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩
use { x : A // x ∈ s }, inferInstance, f
· rintro ⟨ι, ⟨hfintype, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩⟩
letI : Fintype ι := hfintype
exact FiniteType.of_surjective (FiniteType.freeAlgebra R ι) f hsur
/-- A commutative algebra is finitely generated if and only if it is a quotient
of a polynomial ring whose variables are indexed by a fintype. -/
theorem iff_quotient_mvPolynomial' : FiniteType R S ↔
∃ (ι : Type uS) (_ : Fintype ι) (f : MvPolynomial ι R →ₐ[R] S), Surjective f := by
constructor
· rw [iff_quotient_mvPolynomial]
rintro ⟨s, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩
use { x : S // x ∈ s }, inferInstance, f
· rintro ⟨ι, ⟨hfintype, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩⟩
letI : Fintype ι := hfintype
exact FiniteType.of_surjective (FiniteType.mvPolynomial R ι) f hsur
/-- A commutative algebra is finitely generated if and only if it is a quotient of a polynomial ring
in `n` variables. -/
theorem iff_quotient_mvPolynomial'' :
FiniteType R S ↔ ∃ (n : ℕ) (f : MvPolynomial (Fin n) R →ₐ[R] S), Surjective f := by
constructor
· rw [iff_quotient_mvPolynomial']
rintro ⟨ι, hfintype, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩
have equiv := MvPolynomial.renameEquiv R (Fintype.equivFin ι)
exact ⟨Fintype.card ι, AlgHom.comp f equiv.symm.toAlgHom, by simpa using hsur⟩
· rintro ⟨n, ⟨f, hsur⟩⟩
exact FiniteType.of_surjective (FiniteType.mvPolynomial R (Fin n)) f hsur
instance prod [hA : FiniteType R A] [hB : FiniteType R B] : FiniteType R (A × B) :=
⟨by rw [← Subalgebra.prod_top]; exact hA.1.prod hB.1⟩
theorem isNoetherianRing (R S : Type*) [CommRing R] [CommRing S] [Algebra R S]
[h : Algebra.FiniteType R S] [IsNoetherianRing R] : IsNoetherianRing S := by
obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := h.1
apply
isNoetherianRing_of_surjective (MvPolynomial s R) S
(MvPolynomial.aeval (↑) : MvPolynomial s R →ₐ[R] S).toRingHom
rw [← Set.range_eq_univ, AlgHom.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingHom.coe_coe, ← AlgHom.coe_range,
← Algebra.adjoin_range_eq_range_aeval, Subtype.range_coe_subtype, Finset.setOf_mem, hs]
rfl
theorem _root_.Subalgebra.fg_iff_finiteType (S : Subalgebra R A) : S.FG ↔ Algebra.FiniteType R S :=
S.fg_top.symm.trans ⟨fun h => ⟨h⟩, fun h => h.out⟩
end FiniteType
end Algebra
end ModuleAndAlgebra
namespace RingHom
variable {A B C : Type*} [CommRing A] [CommRing B] [CommRing C]
/-- A ring morphism `A →+* B` is of `FiniteType` if `B` is finitely generated as `A`-algebra. -/
@[algebraize]
def FiniteType (f : A →+* B) : Prop :=
@Algebra.FiniteType A B _ _ f.toAlgebra
namespace Finite
theorem finiteType {f : A →+* B} (hf : f.Finite) : FiniteType f :=
@Module.Finite.finiteType _ _ _ _ f.toAlgebra hf
end Finite
namespace FiniteType
variable (A) in
theorem id : FiniteType (RingHom.id A) :=
Algebra.FiniteType.self A
theorem comp_surjective {f : A →+* B} {g : B →+* C} (hf : f.FiniteType) (hg : Surjective g) :
(g.comp f).FiniteType := by
algebraize_only [f, g.comp f]
exact Algebra.FiniteType.of_surjective hf
{ g with
toFun := g
commutes' := fun a => rfl }
hg
theorem of_surjective (f : A →+* B) (hf : Surjective f) : f.FiniteType := by
rw [← f.comp_id]
exact (id A).comp_surjective hf
theorem comp {g : B →+* C} {f : A →+* B} (hg : g.FiniteType) (hf : f.FiniteType) :
(g.comp f).FiniteType := by
algebraize_only [f, g, g.comp f]
exact Algebra.FiniteType.trans hf hg
theorem of_finite {f : A →+* B} (hf : f.Finite) : f.FiniteType :=
| @Module.Finite.finiteType _ _ _ _ f.toAlgebra hf
alias _root_.RingHom.Finite.to_finiteType := of_finite
theorem of_comp_finiteType {f : A →+* B} {g : B →+* C} (h : (g.comp f).FiniteType) :
g.FiniteType := by
algebraize [f, g, g.comp f]
exact Algebra.FiniteType.of_restrictScalars_finiteType A B C
| Mathlib/RingTheory/FiniteType.lean | 251 | 259 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Leonardo de Moura, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Commute
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Invertible
import Mathlib.Order.Synonym
/-!
# Lemmas about division (semi)rings and (semi)fields
-/
open Function OrderDual Set
universe u
variable {K L : Type*}
section DivisionSemiring
variable [DivisionSemiring K] {a b c d : K}
theorem add_div (a b c : K) : (a + b) / c = a / c + b / c := by simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, add_mul]
@[field_simps]
theorem div_add_div_same (a b c : K) : a / c + b / c = (a + b) / c :=
(add_div _ _ _).symm
theorem same_add_div (h : b ≠ 0) : (b + a) / b = 1 + a / b := by rw [← div_self h, add_div]
theorem div_add_same (h : b ≠ 0) : (a + b) / b = a / b + 1 := by rw [← div_self h, add_div]
theorem one_add_div (h : b ≠ 0) : 1 + a / b = (b + a) / b :=
(same_add_div h).symm
theorem div_add_one (h : b ≠ 0) : a / b + 1 = (a + b) / b :=
(div_add_same h).symm
/-- See `inv_add_inv` for the more convenient version when `K` is commutative. -/
theorem inv_add_inv' (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a⁻¹ + b⁻¹ = a⁻¹ * (a + b) * b⁻¹ :=
let _ := invertibleOfNonzero ha; let _ := invertibleOfNonzero hb; invOf_add_invOf a b
theorem one_div_mul_add_mul_one_div_eq_one_div_add_one_div (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
1 / a * (a + b) * (1 / b) = 1 / a + 1 / b := by
simpa only [one_div] using (inv_add_inv' ha hb).symm
theorem add_div_eq_mul_add_div (a b : K) (hc : c ≠ 0) : a + b / c = (a * c + b) / c :=
(eq_div_iff_mul_eq hc).2 <| by rw [right_distrib, div_mul_cancel₀ _ hc]
@[field_simps]
theorem add_div' (a b c : K) (hc : c ≠ 0) : b + a / c = (b * c + a) / c := by
rw [add_div, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hc]
@[field_simps]
theorem div_add' (a b c : K) (hc : c ≠ 0) : a / c + b = (a + b * c) / c := by
rwa [add_comm, add_div', add_comm]
protected theorem Commute.div_add_div (hbc : Commute b c) (hbd : Commute b d) (hb : b ≠ 0)
(hd : d ≠ 0) : a / b + c / d = (a * d + b * c) / (b * d) := by
rw [add_div, mul_div_mul_right _ b hd, hbc.eq, hbd.eq, mul_div_mul_right c d hb]
protected theorem Commute.one_div_add_one_div (hab : Commute a b) (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
1 / a + 1 / b = (a + b) / (a * b) := by
rw [(Commute.one_right a).div_add_div hab ha hb, one_mul, mul_one, add_comm]
protected theorem Commute.inv_add_inv (hab : Commute a b) (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a⁻¹ + b⁻¹ = (a + b) / (a * b) := by
rw [inv_eq_one_div, inv_eq_one_div, hab.one_div_add_one_div ha hb]
variable [NeZero (2 : K)]
@[simp] lemma add_self_div_two (a : K) : (a + a) / 2 = a := by
rw [← mul_two, mul_div_cancel_right₀ a two_ne_zero]
@[simp] lemma add_halves (a : K) : a / 2 + a / 2 = a := by rw [← add_div, add_self_div_two]
end DivisionSemiring
section DivisionRing
variable [DivisionRing K] {a b c d : K}
@[simp]
theorem div_neg_self {a : K} (h : a ≠ 0) : a / -a = -1 := by rw [div_neg_eq_neg_div, div_self h]
@[simp]
theorem neg_div_self {a : K} (h : a ≠ 0) : -a / a = -1 := by rw [neg_div, div_self h]
theorem div_sub_div_same (a b c : K) : a / c - b / c = (a - b) / c := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_div, div_add_div_same, sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem same_sub_div {a b : K} (h : b ≠ 0) : (b - a) / b = 1 - a / b := by
simpa only [← @div_self _ _ b h] using (div_sub_div_same b a b).symm
theorem one_sub_div {a b : K} (h : b ≠ 0) : 1 - a / b = (b - a) / b :=
(same_sub_div h).symm
theorem div_sub_same {a b : K} (h : b ≠ 0) : (a - b) / b = a / b - 1 := by
simpa only [← @div_self _ _ b h] using (div_sub_div_same a b b).symm
theorem div_sub_one {a b : K} (h : b ≠ 0) : a / b - 1 = (a - b) / b :=
(div_sub_same h).symm
theorem sub_div (a b c : K) : (a - b) / c = a / c - b / c :=
(div_sub_div_same _ _ _).symm
/-- See `inv_sub_inv` for the more convenient version when `K` is commutative. -/
theorem inv_sub_inv' {a b : K} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) : a⁻¹ - b⁻¹ = a⁻¹ * (b - a) * b⁻¹ :=
let _ := invertibleOfNonzero ha; let _ := invertibleOfNonzero hb; invOf_sub_invOf a b
theorem one_div_mul_sub_mul_one_div_eq_one_div_add_one_div (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
1 / a * (b - a) * (1 / b) = 1 / a - 1 / b := by
simpa only [one_div] using (inv_sub_inv' ha hb).symm
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) DivisionRing.isDomain : IsDomain K :=
NoZeroDivisors.to_isDomain _
protected theorem Commute.div_sub_div (hbc : Commute b c) (hbd : Commute b d) (hb : b ≠ 0)
(hd : d ≠ 0) : a / b - c / d = (a * d - b * c) / (b * d) := by
simpa only [mul_neg, neg_div, ← sub_eq_add_neg] using hbc.neg_right.div_add_div hbd hb hd
protected theorem Commute.inv_sub_inv (hab : Commute a b) (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a⁻¹ - b⁻¹ = (b - a) / (a * b) := by
simp only [inv_eq_one_div, (Commute.one_right a).div_sub_div hab ha hb, one_mul, mul_one]
variable [NeZero (2 : K)]
lemma sub_half (a : K) : a - a / 2 = a / 2 := by rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add, add_halves]
lemma half_sub (a : K) : a / 2 - a = -(a / 2) := by rw [← neg_sub, sub_half]
end DivisionRing
section Semifield
variable [Semifield K] {a b d : K}
theorem div_add_div (a : K) (c : K) (hb : b ≠ 0) (hd : d ≠ 0) :
a / b + c / d = (a * d + b * c) / (b * d) :=
(Commute.all b _).div_add_div (Commute.all _ _) hb hd
theorem one_div_add_one_div (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) : 1 / a + 1 / b = (a + b) / (a * b) :=
| (Commute.all a _).one_div_add_one_div ha hb
| Mathlib/Algebra/Field/Basic.lean | 147 | 147 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Jeremy Avigad, Simon Hudon
-/
import Batteries.WF
import Mathlib.Data.Part
import Mathlib.Data.Rel
import Mathlib.Tactic.GeneralizeProofs
/-!
# Partial functions
This file defines partial functions. Partial functions are like functions, except they can also be
"undefined" on some inputs. We define them as functions `α → Part β`.
## Definitions
* `PFun α β`: Type of partial functions from `α` to `β`. Defined as `α → Part β` and denoted
`α →. β`.
* `PFun.Dom`: Domain of a partial function. Set of values on which it is defined. Not to be confused
with the domain of a function `α → β`, which is a type (`α` presently).
* `PFun.fn`: Evaluation of a partial function. Takes in an element and a proof it belongs to the
partial function's `Dom`.
* `PFun.asSubtype`: Returns a partial function as a function from its `Dom`.
* `PFun.toSubtype`: Restricts the codomain of a function to a subtype.
* `PFun.evalOpt`: Returns a partial function with a decidable `Dom` as a function `a → Option β`.
* `PFun.lift`: Turns a function into a partial function.
* `PFun.id`: The identity as a partial function.
* `PFun.comp`: Composition of partial functions.
* `PFun.restrict`: Restriction of a partial function to a smaller `Dom`.
* `PFun.res`: Turns a function into a partial function with a prescribed domain.
* `PFun.fix` : First return map of a partial function `f : α →. β ⊕ α`.
* `PFun.fix_induction`: A recursion principle for `PFun.fix`.
### Partial functions as relations
Partial functions can be considered as relations, so we specialize some `Rel` definitions to `PFun`:
* `PFun.image`: Image of a set under a partial function.
* `PFun.ran`: Range of a partial function.
* `PFun.preimage`: Preimage of a set under a partial function.
* `PFun.core`: Core of a set under a partial function.
* `PFun.graph`: Graph of a partial function `a →. β`as a `Set (α × β)`.
* `PFun.graph'`: Graph of a partial function `a →. β`as a `Rel α β`.
### `PFun α` as a monad
Monad operations:
* `PFun.pure`: The monad `pure` function, the constant `x` function.
* `PFun.bind`: The monad `bind` function, pointwise `Part.bind`
* `PFun.map`: The monad `map` function, pointwise `Part.map`.
-/
-- Pending rename in core.
alias WellFounded.fixF_eq := WellFounded.fixFEq
open Function
/-- `PFun α β`, or `α →. β`, is the type of partial functions from
`α` to `β`. It is defined as `α → Part β`. -/
def PFun (α β : Type*) :=
α → Part β
/-- `α →. β` is notation for the type `PFun α β` of partial functions from `α` to `β`. -/
infixr:25 " →. " => PFun
namespace PFun
variable {α β γ δ ε ι : Type*}
instance inhabited : Inhabited (α →. β) :=
⟨fun _ => Part.none⟩
/-- The domain of a partial function -/
def Dom (f : α →. β) : Set α :=
{ a | (f a).Dom }
@[simp]
theorem mem_dom (f : α →. β) (x : α) : x ∈ Dom f ↔ ∃ y, y ∈ f x := by simp [Dom, Part.dom_iff_mem]
@[simp]
theorem dom_mk (p : α → Prop) (f : ∀ a, p a → β) : (PFun.Dom fun x => ⟨p x, f x⟩) = { x | p x } :=
rfl
theorem dom_eq (f : α →. β) : Dom f = { x | ∃ y, y ∈ f x } :=
Set.ext (mem_dom f)
/-- Evaluate a partial function -/
def fn (f : α →. β) (a : α) : Dom f a → β :=
(f a).get
@[simp]
theorem fn_apply (f : α →. β) (a : α) : f.fn a = (f a).get :=
rfl
/-- Evaluate a partial function to return an `Option` -/
def evalOpt (f : α →. β) [D : DecidablePred (· ∈ Dom f)] (x : α) : Option β :=
@Part.toOption _ _ (D x)
/-- Partial function extensionality -/
theorem ext' {f g : α →. β} (H1 : ∀ a, a ∈ Dom f ↔ a ∈ Dom g) (H2 : ∀ a p q, f.fn a p = g.fn a q) :
f = g :=
funext fun a => Part.ext' (H1 a) (H2 a)
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : α →. β} (H : ∀ a b, b ∈ f a ↔ b ∈ g a) : f = g :=
funext fun a => Part.ext (H a)
/-- Turns a partial function into a function out of its domain. -/
def asSubtype (f : α →. β) (s : f.Dom) : β :=
f.fn s s.2
/-- The type of partial functions `α →. β` is equivalent to
the type of pairs `(p : α → Prop, f : Subtype p → β)`. -/
def equivSubtype : (α →. β) ≃ Σp : α → Prop, Subtype p → β :=
⟨fun f => ⟨fun a => (f a).Dom, asSubtype f⟩, fun f x => ⟨f.1 x, fun h => f.2 ⟨x, h⟩⟩, fun _ =>
funext fun _ => Part.eta _, fun ⟨p, f⟩ => by dsimp; congr⟩
theorem asSubtype_eq_of_mem {f : α →. β} {x : α} {y : β} (fxy : y ∈ f x) (domx : x ∈ f.Dom) :
f.asSubtype ⟨x, domx⟩ = y :=
Part.mem_unique (Part.get_mem _) fxy
/-- Turn a total function into a partial function. -/
@[coe]
protected def lift (f : α → β) : α →. β := fun a => Part.some (f a)
instance coe : Coe (α → β) (α →. β) :=
⟨PFun.lift⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_val (f : α → β) (a : α) : (f : α →. β) a = Part.some (f a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dom_coe (f : α → β) : (f : α →. β).Dom = Set.univ :=
rfl
theorem lift_injective : Injective (PFun.lift : (α → β) → α →. β) := fun _ _ h =>
funext fun a => Part.some_injective <| congr_fun h a
/-- Graph of a partial function `f` as the set of pairs `(x, f x)` where `x` is in the domain of
`f`. -/
def graph (f : α →. β) : Set (α × β) :=
{ p | p.2 ∈ f p.1 }
/-- Graph of a partial function as a relation. `x` and `y` are related iff `f x` is defined and
"equals" `y`. -/
def graph' (f : α →. β) : Rel α β := fun x y => y ∈ f x
/-- The range of a partial function is the set of values
`f x` where `x` is in the domain of `f`. -/
def ran (f : α →. β) : Set β :=
{ b | ∃ a, b ∈ f a }
/-- Restrict a partial function to a smaller domain. -/
def restrict (f : α →. β) {p : Set α} (H : p ⊆ f.Dom) : α →. β := fun x =>
(f x).restrict (x ∈ p) (@H x)
@[simp]
theorem mem_restrict {f : α →. β} {s : Set α} (h : s ⊆ f.Dom) (a : α) (b : β) :
b ∈ f.restrict h a ↔ a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ f a := by simp [restrict]
/-- Turns a function into a partial function with a prescribed domain. -/
def res (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : α →. β :=
(PFun.lift f).restrict s.subset_univ
theorem mem_res (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (a : α) (b : β) : b ∈ res f s a ↔ a ∈ s ∧ f a = b := by
simp [res, @eq_comm _ b]
theorem res_univ (f : α → β) : PFun.res f Set.univ = f :=
rfl
theorem dom_iff_graph (f : α →. β) (x : α) : x ∈ f.Dom ↔ ∃ y, (x, y) ∈ f.graph :=
Part.dom_iff_mem
theorem lift_graph {f : α → β} {a b} : (a, b) ∈ (f : α →. β).graph ↔ f a = b :=
show (∃ _ : True, f a = b) ↔ f a = b by simp
/-- The monad `pure` function, the total constant `x` function -/
protected def pure (x : β) : α →. β := fun _ => Part.some x
/-- The monad `bind` function, pointwise `Part.bind` -/
def bind (f : α →. β) (g : β → α →. γ) : α →. γ := fun a => (f a).bind fun b => g b a
@[simp]
theorem bind_apply (f : α →. β) (g : β → α →. γ) (a : α) : f.bind g a = (f a).bind fun b => g b a :=
rfl
/-- The monad `map` function, pointwise `Part.map` -/
def map (f : β → γ) (g : α →. β) : α →. γ := fun a => (g a).map f
instance monad : Monad (PFun α) where
pure := PFun.pure
bind := PFun.bind
map := PFun.map
instance lawfulMonad : LawfulMonad (PFun α) := LawfulMonad.mk'
(bind_pure_comp := fun _ _ => funext fun _ => Part.bind_some_eq_map _ _)
(id_map := fun f => by funext a; dsimp [Functor.map, PFun.map]; cases f a; rfl)
(pure_bind := fun x f => funext fun _ => Part.bind_some _ (f x))
(bind_assoc := fun f g k => funext fun a => (f a).bind_assoc (fun b => g b a) fun b => k b a)
theorem pure_defined (p : Set α) (x : β) : p ⊆ (@PFun.pure α _ x).Dom :=
p.subset_univ
theorem bind_defined {α β γ} (p : Set α) {f : α →. β} {g : β → α →. γ} (H1 : p ⊆ f.Dom)
(H2 : ∀ x, p ⊆ (g x).Dom) : p ⊆ (f >>= g).Dom := fun a ha =>
(⟨H1 ha, H2 _ ha⟩ : (f >>= g).Dom a)
/-- First return map. Transforms a partial function `f : α →. β ⊕ α` into the partial function
`α →. β` which sends `a : α` to the first value in `β` it hits by iterating `f`, if such a value
exists. By abusing notation to illustrate, either `f a` is in the `β` part of `β ⊕ α` (in which
case `f.fix a` returns `f a`), or it is undefined (in which case `f.fix a` is undefined as well), or
it is in the `α` part of `β ⊕ α` (in which case we repeat the procedure, so `f.fix a` will return
`f.fix (f a)`). -/
def fix (f : α →. β ⊕ α) : α →. β := fun a =>
Part.assert (Acc (fun x y => Sum.inr x ∈ f y) a) fun h =>
WellFounded.fixF
(fun a IH =>
Part.assert (f a).Dom fun hf =>
match e : (f a).get hf with
| Sum.inl b => Part.some b
| Sum.inr a' => IH a' ⟨hf, e⟩)
a h
theorem dom_of_mem_fix {f : α →. β ⊕ α} {a : α} {b : β} (h : b ∈ f.fix a) : (f a).Dom := by
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := Part.mem_assert_iff.1 h
rw [WellFounded.fixF_eq] at h₂; exact h₂.fst.fst
theorem mem_fix_iff {f : α →. β ⊕ α} {a : α} {b : β} :
b ∈ f.fix a ↔ Sum.inl b ∈ f a ∨ ∃ a', Sum.inr a' ∈ f a ∧ b ∈ f.fix a' :=
⟨fun h => by
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := Part.mem_assert_iff.1 h
rw [WellFounded.fixF_eq] at h₂
simp only [Part.mem_assert_iff] at h₂
obtain ⟨h₂, h₃⟩ := h₂
split at h₃
next e => simp only [Part.mem_some_iff] at h₃; subst b; exact Or.inl ⟨h₂, e⟩
next e => exact Or.inr ⟨_, ⟨_, e⟩, Part.mem_assert _ h₃⟩,
fun h => by
simp only [fix, Part.mem_assert_iff]
rcases h with (⟨h₁, h₂⟩ | ⟨a', h, h₃⟩)
· refine ⟨⟨_, fun y h' => ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· injection Part.mem_unique ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ h'
· rw [WellFounded.fixF_eq]
-- Porting note: used to be simp [h₁, h₂]
apply Part.mem_assert h₁
split
next e =>
injection h₂.symm.trans e with h; simp [h]
next e =>
injection h₂.symm.trans e
· simp only [fix, Part.mem_assert_iff] at h₃
obtain ⟨h₃, h₄⟩ := h₃
refine ⟨⟨_, fun y h' => ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· injection Part.mem_unique h h' with e
exact e ▸ h₃
· obtain ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := h
rw [WellFounded.fixF_eq]
-- Porting note: used to be simp [h₁, h₂, h₄]
apply Part.mem_assert h₁
split
next e =>
injection h₂.symm.trans e
next e =>
injection h₂.symm.trans e; subst a'; exact h₄⟩
/-- If advancing one step from `a` leads to `b : β`, then `f.fix a = b` -/
theorem fix_stop {f : α →. β ⊕ α} {b : β} {a : α} (hb : Sum.inl b ∈ f a) : b ∈ f.fix a := by
rw [PFun.mem_fix_iff]
exact Or.inl hb
/-- If advancing one step from `a` on `f` leads to `a' : α`, then `f.fix a = f.fix a'` -/
theorem fix_fwd_eq {f : α →. β ⊕ α} {a a' : α} (ha' : Sum.inr a' ∈ f a) : f.fix a = f.fix a' := by
ext b; constructor
· intro h
obtain h' | ⟨a, h', e'⟩ := mem_fix_iff.1 h <;> cases Part.mem_unique ha' h'
exact e'
· intro h
rw [PFun.mem_fix_iff]
exact Or.inr ⟨a', ha', h⟩
theorem fix_fwd {f : α →. β ⊕ α} {b : β} {a a' : α} (hb : b ∈ f.fix a) (ha' : Sum.inr a' ∈ f a) :
b ∈ f.fix a' := by rwa [← fix_fwd_eq ha']
/-- A recursion principle for `PFun.fix`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def fixInduction {C : α → Sort*} {f : α →. β ⊕ α} {b : β} {a : α} (h : b ∈ f.fix a)
(H : ∀ a', b ∈ f.fix a' → (∀ a'', Sum.inr a'' ∈ f a' → C a'') → C a') : C a := by
have h₂ := (Part.mem_assert_iff.1 h).snd
generalize_proofs at h₂
clear h
induction ‹Acc _ _› with | intro a ha IH => _
have h : b ∈ f.fix a := Part.mem_assert_iff.2 ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, h₂⟩
exact H a h fun a' fa' => IH a' fa' (Part.mem_assert_iff.1 (fix_fwd h fa')).snd
theorem fixInduction_spec {C : α → Sort*} {f : α →. β ⊕ α} {b : β} {a : α} (h : b ∈ f.fix a)
(H : ∀ a', b ∈ f.fix a' → (∀ a'', Sum.inr a'' ∈ f a' → C a'') → C a') :
@fixInduction _ _ C _ _ _ h H = H a h fun _ h' => fixInduction (fix_fwd h h') H := by
unfold fixInduction
generalize_proofs
induction ‹Acc _ _›
rfl
/-- Another induction lemma for `b ∈ f.fix a` which allows one to prove a predicate `P` holds for
`a` given that `f a` inherits `P` from `a` and `P` holds for preimages of `b`.
-/
@[elab_as_elim]
def fixInduction' {C : α → Sort*} {f : α →. β ⊕ α} {b : β} {a : α}
(h : b ∈ f.fix a) (hbase : ∀ a_final : α, Sum.inl b ∈ f a_final → C a_final)
(hind : ∀ a₀ a₁ : α, b ∈ f.fix a₁ → Sum.inr a₁ ∈ f a₀ → C a₁ → C a₀) : C a := by
refine fixInduction h fun a' h ih => ?_
rcases e : (f a').get (dom_of_mem_fix h) with b' | a'' <;> replace e : _ ∈ f a' := ⟨_, e⟩
· apply hbase
convert e
exact Part.mem_unique h (fix_stop e)
· exact hind _ _ (fix_fwd h e) e (ih _ e)
theorem fixInduction'_stop {C : α → Sort*} {f : α →. β ⊕ α} {b : β} {a : α} (h : b ∈ f.fix a)
(fa : Sum.inl b ∈ f a) (hbase : ∀ a_final : α, Sum.inl b ∈ f a_final → C a_final)
(hind : ∀ a₀ a₁ : α, b ∈ f.fix a₁ → Sum.inr a₁ ∈ f a₀ → C a₁ → C a₀) :
| @fixInduction' _ _ C _ _ _ h hbase hind = hbase a fa := by
unfold fixInduction'
| Mathlib/Data/PFun.lean | 322 | 323 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.MeasurablyGenerated
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.NullMeasurable
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Monotone
/-!
# Measure spaces
The definition of a measure and a measure space are in `MeasureTheory.MeasureSpaceDef`, with
only a few basic properties. This file provides many more properties of these objects.
This separation allows the measurability tactic to import only the file `MeasureSpaceDef`, and to
be available in `MeasureSpace` (through `MeasurableSpace`).
Given a measurable space `α`, a measure on `α` is a function that sends measurable sets to the
extended nonnegative reals that satisfies the following conditions:
1. `μ ∅ = 0`;
2. `μ` is countably additive. This means that the measure of a countable union of pairwise disjoint
sets is equal to the measure of the individual sets.
Every measure can be canonically extended to an outer measure, so that it assigns values to
all subsets, not just the measurable subsets. On the other hand, a measure that is countably
additive on measurable sets can be restricted to measurable sets to obtain a measure.
In this file a measure is defined to be an outer measure that is countably additive on
measurable sets, with the additional assumption that the outer measure is the canonical
extension of the restricted measure.
Measures on `α` form a complete lattice, and are closed under scalar multiplication with `ℝ≥0∞`.
Given a measure, the null sets are the sets where `μ s = 0`, where `μ` denotes the corresponding
outer measure (so `s` might not be measurable). We can then define the completion of `μ` as the
measure on the least `σ`-algebra that also contains all null sets, by defining the measure to be `0`
on the null sets.
## Main statements
* `completion` is the completion of a measure to all null measurable sets.
* `Measure.ofMeasurable` and `OuterMeasure.toMeasure` are two important ways to define a measure.
## Implementation notes
Given `μ : Measure α`, `μ s` is the value of the *outer measure* applied to `s`.
This conveniently allows us to apply the measure to sets without proving that they are measurable.
We get countable subadditivity for all sets, but only countable additivity for measurable sets.
You often don't want to define a measure via its constructor.
Two ways that are sometimes more convenient:
* `Measure.ofMeasurable` is a way to define a measure by only giving its value on measurable sets
and proving the properties (1) and (2) mentioned above.
* `OuterMeasure.toMeasure` is a way of obtaining a measure from an outer measure by showing that
all measurable sets in the measurable space are Carathéodory measurable.
To prove that two measures are equal, there are multiple options:
* `ext`: two measures are equal if they are equal on all measurable sets.
* `ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion`: two measures are equal if they are equal on a π-system generating
the measurable sets, if the π-system contains a spanning increasing sequence of sets where the
measures take finite value (in particular the measures are σ-finite). This is a special case of
the more general `ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover`
* `ext_of_generate_finite`: two finite measures are equal if they are equal on a π-system
generating the measurable sets. This is a special case of `ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion` using
`C ∪ {univ}`, but is easier to work with.
A `MeasureSpace` is a class that is a measurable space with a canonical measure.
The measure is denoted `volume`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measure_(mathematics)>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complete_measure>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_everywhere>
## Tags
measure, almost everywhere, measure space, completion, null set, null measurable set
-/
noncomputable section
open Set
open Filter hiding map
open Function MeasurableSpace Topology Filter ENNReal NNReal Interval MeasureTheory
open scoped symmDiff
variable {α β γ δ ι R R' : Type*}
namespace MeasureTheory
section
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set α}
instance ae_isMeasurablyGenerated : IsMeasurablyGenerated (ae μ) :=
⟨fun _s hs =>
let ⟨t, hst, htm, htμ⟩ := exists_measurable_superset_of_null hs
⟨tᶜ, compl_mem_ae_iff.2 htμ, htm.compl, compl_subset_comm.1 hst⟩⟩
/-- See also `MeasureTheory.ae_restrict_uIoc_iff`. -/
theorem ae_uIoc_iff [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ι a b → P x) ↔ (∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ioc a b → P x) ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ioc b a → P x := by
simp only [uIoc_eq_union, mem_union, or_imp, eventually_and]
theorem measure_union (hd : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (h : MeasurableSet s₂) : μ (s₁ ∪ s₂) = μ s₁ + μ s₂ :=
measure_union₀ h.nullMeasurableSet hd.aedisjoint
theorem measure_union' (hd : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (h : MeasurableSet s₁) : μ (s₁ ∪ s₂) = μ s₁ + μ s₂ :=
measure_union₀' h.nullMeasurableSet hd.aedisjoint
theorem measure_inter_add_diff (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ (s ∩ t) + μ (s \ t) = μ s :=
measure_inter_add_diff₀ _ ht.nullMeasurableSet
theorem measure_diff_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ (s \ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s :=
(add_comm _ _).trans (measure_inter_add_diff s ht)
theorem measure_diff_eq_top (hs : μ s = ∞) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : μ (s \ t) = ∞ := by
contrapose! hs
exact ((measure_mono (subset_diff_union s t)).trans_lt
((measure_union_le _ _).trans_lt (ENNReal.add_lt_top.2 ⟨hs.lt_top, ht.lt_top⟩))).ne
theorem measure_union_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ (s ∪ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s + μ t := by
rw [← measure_inter_add_diff (s ∪ t) ht, Set.union_inter_cancel_right, union_diff_right, ←
measure_inter_add_diff s ht]
ac_rfl
theorem measure_union_add_inter' (hs : MeasurableSet s) (t : Set α) :
μ (s ∪ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s + μ t := by
rw [union_comm, inter_comm, measure_union_add_inter t hs, add_comm]
lemma measure_symmDiff_eq (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
μ (s ∆ t) = μ (s \ t) + μ (t \ s) := by
simpa only [symmDiff_def, sup_eq_union]
using measure_union₀ (ht.diff hs) disjoint_sdiff_sdiff.aedisjoint
lemma measure_symmDiff_le (s t u : Set α) :
μ (s ∆ u) ≤ μ (s ∆ t) + μ (t ∆ u) :=
le_trans (μ.mono <| symmDiff_triangle s t u) (measure_union_le (s ∆ t) (t ∆ u))
theorem measure_symmDiff_eq_top (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (ht : μ t = ∞) : μ (s ∆ t) = ∞ :=
measure_mono_top subset_union_right (measure_diff_eq_top ht hs)
theorem measure_add_measure_compl (h : MeasurableSet s) : μ s + μ sᶜ = μ univ :=
measure_add_measure_compl₀ h.nullMeasurableSet
theorem measure_biUnion₀ {s : Set β} {f : β → Set α} (hs : s.Countable)
(hd : s.Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on f)) (h : ∀ b ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (f b) μ) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑' p : s, μ (f p) := by
haveI := hs.toEncodable
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact measure_iUnion₀ (hd.on_injective Subtype.coe_injective fun x => x.2) fun x => h x x.2
theorem measure_biUnion {s : Set β} {f : β → Set α} (hs : s.Countable) (hd : s.PairwiseDisjoint f)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑' p : s, μ (f p) :=
measure_biUnion₀ hs hd.aedisjoint fun b hb => (h b hb).nullMeasurableSet
theorem measure_sUnion₀ {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : S.Countable) (hd : S.Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ))
(h : ∀ s ∈ S, NullMeasurableSet s μ) : μ (⋃₀ S) = ∑' s : S, μ s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, measure_biUnion₀ hs hd h]
theorem measure_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : S.Countable) (hd : S.Pairwise Disjoint)
(h : ∀ s ∈ S, MeasurableSet s) : μ (⋃₀ S) = ∑' s : S, μ s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, measure_biUnion hs hd h]
theorem measure_biUnion_finset₀ {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Set α}
(hd : Set.Pairwise (↑s) (AEDisjoint μ on f)) (hm : ∀ b ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (f b) μ) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ p ∈ s, μ (f p) := by
rw [← Finset.sum_attach, Finset.attach_eq_univ, ← tsum_fintype]
exact measure_biUnion₀ s.countable_toSet hd hm
theorem measure_biUnion_finset {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Set α} (hd : PairwiseDisjoint (↑s) f)
(hm : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ p ∈ s, μ (f p) :=
measure_biUnion_finset₀ hd.aedisjoint fun b hb => (hm b hb).nullMeasurableSet
/-- The measure of an a.e. disjoint union (even uncountable) of null-measurable sets is at least
the sum of the measures of the sets. -/
theorem tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint₀ {ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
{As : ι → Set α} (As_mble : ∀ i : ι, NullMeasurableSet (As i) μ)
(As_disj : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on As)) : (∑' i, μ (As i)) ≤ μ (⋃ i, As i) := by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum, iSup_le_iff]
intro s
simp only [← measure_biUnion_finset₀ (fun _i _hi _j _hj hij => As_disj hij) fun i _ => As_mble i]
gcongr
exact iUnion_subset fun _ ↦ Subset.rfl
/-- The measure of a disjoint union (even uncountable) of measurable sets is at least the sum of
the measures of the sets. -/
theorem tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint {ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
{As : ι → Set α} (As_mble : ∀ i : ι, MeasurableSet (As i))
(As_disj : Pairwise (Disjoint on As)) : (∑' i, μ (As i)) ≤ μ (⋃ i, As i) :=
tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint₀ μ (fun i ↦ (As_mble i).nullMeasurableSet)
(fun _ _ h ↦ Disjoint.aedisjoint (As_disj h))
/-- If `s` is a countable set, then the measure of its preimage can be found as the sum of measures
of the fibers `f ⁻¹' {y}`. -/
theorem tsum_measure_preimage_singleton {s : Set β} (hs : s.Countable) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ y ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {y})) : (∑' b : s, μ (f ⁻¹' {↑b})) = μ (f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← Set.biUnion_preimage_singleton, measure_biUnion hs (pairwiseDisjoint_fiber f s) hf]
lemma measure_preimage_eq_zero_iff_of_countable {s : Set β} {f : α → β} (hs : s.Countable) :
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = 0 ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, μ (f ⁻¹' {x}) = 0 := by
rw [← biUnion_preimage_singleton, measure_biUnion_null_iff hs]
/-- If `s` is a `Finset`, then the measure of its preimage can be found as the sum of measures
of the fibers `f ⁻¹' {y}`. -/
theorem sum_measure_preimage_singleton (s : Finset β) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ y ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {y})) : (∑ b ∈ s, μ (f ⁻¹' {b})) = μ (f ⁻¹' ↑s) := by
simp only [← measure_biUnion_finset (pairwiseDisjoint_fiber f s) hf,
Finset.set_biUnion_preimage_singleton]
@[simp] lemma sum_measure_singleton {s : Finset α} [MeasurableSingletonClass α] :
∑ x ∈ s, μ {x} = μ s := by
trans ∑ x ∈ s, μ (id ⁻¹' {x})
· simp
rw [sum_measure_preimage_singleton]
· simp
· simp
theorem measure_diff_null' (h : μ (s₁ ∩ s₂) = 0) : μ (s₁ \ s₂) = μ s₁ :=
measure_congr <| diff_ae_eq_self.2 h
theorem measure_add_diff (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (t : Set α) :
μ s + μ (t \ s) = μ (s ∪ t) := by
rw [← measure_union₀' hs disjoint_sdiff_right.aedisjoint, union_diff_self]
theorem measure_diff' (s : Set α) (hm : NullMeasurableSet t μ) (h_fin : μ t ≠ ∞) :
μ (s \ t) = μ (s ∪ t) - μ t :=
ENNReal.eq_sub_of_add_eq h_fin <| by rw [add_comm, measure_add_diff hm, union_comm]
theorem measure_diff (h : s₂ ⊆ s₁) (h₂ : NullMeasurableSet s₂ μ) (h_fin : μ s₂ ≠ ∞) :
μ (s₁ \ s₂) = μ s₁ - μ s₂ := by rw [measure_diff' _ h₂ h_fin, union_eq_self_of_subset_right h]
theorem le_measure_diff : μ s₁ - μ s₂ ≤ μ (s₁ \ s₂) :=
tsub_le_iff_left.2 <| (measure_le_inter_add_diff μ s₁ s₂).trans <| by
gcongr; apply inter_subset_right
/-- If the measure of the symmetric difference of two sets is finite,
then one has infinite measure if and only if the other one does. -/
theorem measure_eq_top_iff_of_symmDiff (hμst : μ (s ∆ t) ≠ ∞) : μ s = ∞ ↔ μ t = ∞ := by
suffices h : ∀ u v, μ (u ∆ v) ≠ ∞ → μ u = ∞ → μ v = ∞
from ⟨h s t hμst, h t s (symmDiff_comm s t ▸ hμst)⟩
intro u v hμuv hμu
by_contra! hμv
apply hμuv
rw [Set.symmDiff_def, eq_top_iff]
calc
∞ = μ u - μ v := by rw [ENNReal.sub_eq_top_iff.2 ⟨hμu, hμv⟩]
_ ≤ μ (u \ v) := le_measure_diff
_ ≤ μ (u \ v ∪ v \ u) := measure_mono subset_union_left
/-- If the measure of the symmetric difference of two sets is finite,
then one has finite measure if and only if the other one does. -/
theorem measure_ne_top_iff_of_symmDiff (hμst : μ (s ∆ t) ≠ ∞) : μ s ≠ ∞ ↔ μ t ≠ ∞ :=
(measure_eq_top_iff_of_symmDiff hμst).ne
theorem measure_diff_lt_of_lt_add (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs' : μ s ≠ ∞)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} (h : μ t < μ s + ε) : μ (t \ s) < ε := by
rw [measure_diff hst hs hs']; rw [add_comm] at h
exact ENNReal.sub_lt_of_lt_add (measure_mono hst) h
theorem measure_diff_le_iff_le_add (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs' : μ s ≠ ∞)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} : μ (t \ s) ≤ ε ↔ μ t ≤ μ s + ε := by
rw [measure_diff hst hs hs', tsub_le_iff_left]
theorem measure_eq_measure_of_null_diff {s t : Set α} (hst : s ⊆ t) (h_nulldiff : μ (t \ s) = 0) :
μ s = μ t := measure_congr <|
EventuallyLE.antisymm (HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE hst) (ae_le_set.mpr h_nulldiff)
theorem measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃)
(h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₁ = μ s₂ ∧ μ s₂ = μ s₃ := by
have le12 : μ s₁ ≤ μ s₂ := measure_mono h12
have le23 : μ s₂ ≤ μ s₃ := measure_mono h23
have key : μ s₃ ≤ μ s₁ :=
calc
μ s₃ = μ (s₃ \ s₁ ∪ s₁) := by rw [diff_union_of_subset (h12.trans h23)]
_ ≤ μ (s₃ \ s₁) + μ s₁ := measure_union_le _ _
_ = μ s₁ := by simp only [h_nulldiff, zero_add]
exact ⟨le12.antisymm (le23.trans key), le23.antisymm (key.trans le12)⟩
theorem measure_eq_measure_smaller_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃) (h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₁ = μ s₂ :=
(measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff h12 h23 h_nulldiff).1
theorem measure_eq_measure_larger_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃) (h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₂ = μ s₃ :=
(measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff h12 h23 h_nulldiff).2
lemma measure_compl₀ (h : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) :
μ sᶜ = μ Set.univ - μ s := by
rw [← measure_add_measure_compl₀ h, ENNReal.add_sub_cancel_left hs]
theorem measure_compl (h₁ : MeasurableSet s) (h_fin : μ s ≠ ∞) : μ sᶜ = μ univ - μ s :=
measure_compl₀ h₁.nullMeasurableSet h_fin
lemma measure_inter_conull' (ht : μ (s \ t) = 0) : μ (s ∩ t) = μ s := by
rw [← diff_compl, measure_diff_null']; rwa [← diff_eq]
lemma measure_inter_conull (ht : μ tᶜ = 0) : μ (s ∩ t) = μ s := by
rw [← diff_compl, measure_diff_null ht]
@[simp]
theorem union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset : (s ∪ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] s ↔ t ≤ᵐ[μ] s := by
rw [ae_le_set]
refine
⟨fun h => by simpa only [union_diff_left] using (ae_eq_set.mp h).1, fun h =>
eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff.mpr
⟨by rwa [ae_le_set, union_diff_left],
HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE subset_union_left⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem union_ae_eq_right_iff_ae_subset : (s ∪ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] t ↔ s ≤ᵐ[μ] t := by
rw [union_comm, union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset]
theorem ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge (h₁ : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) (h₂ : μ t ≤ μ s)
(hsm : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : s =ᵐ[μ] t := by
refine eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff.mpr ⟨h₁, ae_le_set.mpr ?_⟩
replace h₂ : μ t = μ s := h₂.antisymm (measure_mono_ae h₁)
replace ht : μ s ≠ ∞ := h₂ ▸ ht
rw [measure_diff' t hsm ht, measure_congr (union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset.mpr h₁), h₂, tsub_self]
/-- If `s ⊆ t`, `μ t ≤ μ s`, `μ t ≠ ∞`, and `s` is measurable, then `s =ᵐ[μ] t`. -/
theorem ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge (h₁ : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : μ t ≤ μ s) (hsm : NullMeasurableSet s μ)
(ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : s =ᵐ[μ] t :=
ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge (HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE h₁) h₂ hsm ht
theorem measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset {ι : Sort*} [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι → Set α}
(hsub : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) (h_le : ∀ i, μ (t i) ≤ μ (s i)) : μ (⋃ i, s i) = μ (⋃ i, t i) := by
refine le_antisymm (by gcongr; apply hsub) ?_
rcases Classical.em (∃ i, μ (t i) = ∞) with (⟨i, hi⟩ | htop)
· calc
μ (⋃ i, t i) ≤ ∞ := le_top
_ ≤ μ (s i) := hi ▸ h_le i
_ ≤ μ (⋃ i, s i) := measure_mono <| subset_iUnion _ _
push_neg at htop
set M := toMeasurable μ
have H : ∀ b, (M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b) : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] M (t b) := by
refine fun b => ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge inter_subset_left ?_ ?_ ?_
· calc
μ (M (t b)) = μ (t b) := measure_toMeasurable _
_ ≤ μ (s b) := h_le b
_ ≤ μ (M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b)) :=
measure_mono <|
subset_inter ((hsub b).trans <| subset_toMeasurable _ _)
((subset_iUnion _ _).trans <| subset_toMeasurable _ _)
· measurability
· rw [measure_toMeasurable]
exact htop b
calc
μ (⋃ b, t b) ≤ μ (⋃ b, M (t b)) := measure_mono (iUnion_mono fun b => subset_toMeasurable _ _)
_ = μ (⋃ b, M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b)) := measure_congr (EventuallyEq.countable_iUnion H).symm
_ ≤ μ (M (⋃ b, s b)) := measure_mono (iUnion_subset fun b => inter_subset_right)
_ = μ (⋃ b, s b) := measure_toMeasurable _
theorem measure_union_congr_of_subset {t₁ t₂ : Set α} (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hsμ : μ s₂ ≤ μ s₁)
(ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) (htμ : μ t₂ ≤ μ t₁) : μ (s₁ ∪ t₁) = μ (s₂ ∪ t₂) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion, union_eq_iUnion]
exact measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨ht, hs⟩) (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨htμ, hsμ⟩)
@[simp]
theorem measure_iUnion_toMeasurable {ι : Sort*} [Countable ι] (s : ι → Set α) :
μ (⋃ i, toMeasurable μ (s i)) = μ (⋃ i, s i) :=
Eq.symm <| measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset (fun _i => subset_toMeasurable _ _) fun _i ↦
(measure_toMeasurable _).le
theorem measure_biUnion_toMeasurable {I : Set β} (hc : I.Countable) (s : β → Set α) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ I, toMeasurable μ (s b)) = μ (⋃ b ∈ I, s b) := by
haveI := hc.toEncodable
simp only [biUnion_eq_iUnion, measure_iUnion_toMeasurable]
@[simp]
theorem measure_toMeasurable_union : μ (toMeasurable μ s ∪ t) = μ (s ∪ t) :=
Eq.symm <|
measure_union_congr_of_subset (subset_toMeasurable _ _) (measure_toMeasurable _).le Subset.rfl
le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem measure_union_toMeasurable : μ (s ∪ toMeasurable μ t) = μ (s ∪ t) :=
Eq.symm <|
measure_union_congr_of_subset Subset.rfl le_rfl (subset_toMeasurable _ _)
(measure_toMeasurable _).le
theorem sum_measure_le_measure_univ {s : Finset ι} {t : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (t i) μ) (H : Set.Pairwise s (AEDisjoint μ on t)) :
(∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i)) ≤ μ (univ : Set α) := by
rw [← measure_biUnion_finset₀ H h]
exact measure_mono (subset_univ _)
theorem tsum_measure_le_measure_univ {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ)
(H : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on s)) : ∑' i, μ (s i) ≤ μ (univ : Set α) := by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum]
exact iSup_le fun s =>
sum_measure_le_measure_univ (fun i _hi => hs i) fun i _hi j _hj hij => H hij
/-- Pigeonhole principle for measure spaces: if `∑' i, μ (s i) > μ univ`, then
one of the intersections `s i ∩ s j` is not empty. -/
theorem exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_tsum_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α}
(μ : Measure α) {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ)
(H : μ (univ : Set α) < ∑' i, μ (s i)) : ∃ i j, i ≠ j ∧ (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty := by
contrapose! H
apply tsum_measure_le_measure_univ hs
intro i j hij
exact (disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr (H i j hij)).aedisjoint
/-- Pigeonhole principle for measure spaces: if `s` is a `Finset` and
`∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i) > μ univ`, then one of the intersections `t i ∩ t j` is not empty. -/
theorem exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_sum_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
{s : Finset ι} {t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (t i) μ)
(H : μ (univ : Set α) < ∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i)) :
∃ i ∈ s, ∃ j ∈ s, ∃ _h : i ≠ j, (t i ∩ t j).Nonempty := by
contrapose! H
apply sum_measure_le_measure_univ h
intro i hi j hj hij
exact (disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr (H i hi j hj hij)).aedisjoint
/-- If two sets `s` and `t` are included in a set `u`, and `μ s + μ t > μ u`,
then `s` intersects `t`. Version assuming that `t` is measurable. -/
theorem nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) {s t u : Set α}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (h's : s ⊆ u) (h't : t ⊆ u) (h : μ u < μ s + μ t) :
(s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [← Set.not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
contrapose! h
calc
μ s + μ t = μ (s ∪ t) := (measure_union h ht).symm
_ ≤ μ u := measure_mono (union_subset h's h't)
/-- If two sets `s` and `t` are included in a set `u`, and `μ s + μ t > μ u`,
then `s` intersects `t`. Version assuming that `s` is measurable. -/
theorem nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add' {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) {s t u : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (h's : s ⊆ u) (h't : t ⊆ u) (h : μ u < μ s + μ t) :
(s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [add_comm] at h
rw [inter_comm]
exact nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add μ hs h't h's h
/-- Continuity from below:
the measure of the union of a directed sequence of (not necessarily measurable) sets
is the supremum of the measures. -/
theorem _root_.Directed.measure_iUnion [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s) :
μ (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, μ (s i) := by
-- WLOG, `ι = ℕ`
rcases Countable.exists_injective_nat ι with ⟨e, he⟩
generalize ht : Function.extend e s ⊥ = t
replace hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) t := ht ▸ hd.extend_bot he
suffices μ (⋃ n, t n) = ⨆ n, μ (t n) by
simp only [← ht, Function.apply_extend μ, ← iSup_eq_iUnion, iSup_extend_bot he,
Function.comp_def, Pi.bot_apply, bot_eq_empty, measure_empty] at this
exact this.trans (iSup_extend_bot he _)
clear! ι
-- The `≥` inequality is trivial
refine le_antisymm ?_ (iSup_le fun i ↦ measure_mono <| subset_iUnion _ _)
-- Choose `T n ⊇ t n` of the same measure, put `Td n = disjointed T`
set T : ℕ → Set α := fun n => toMeasurable μ (t n)
set Td : ℕ → Set α := disjointed T
have hm : ∀ n, MeasurableSet (Td n) := .disjointed fun n ↦ measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _
calc
μ (⋃ n, t n) = μ (⋃ n, Td n) := by rw [iUnion_disjointed, measure_iUnion_toMeasurable]
_ ≤ ∑' n, μ (Td n) := measure_iUnion_le _
_ = ⨆ I : Finset ℕ, ∑ n ∈ I, μ (Td n) := ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum
_ ≤ ⨆ n, μ (t n) := iSup_le fun I => by
rcases hd.finset_le I with ⟨N, hN⟩
calc
(∑ n ∈ I, μ (Td n)) = μ (⋃ n ∈ I, Td n) :=
(measure_biUnion_finset ((disjoint_disjointed T).set_pairwise I) fun n _ => hm n).symm
_ ≤ μ (⋃ n ∈ I, T n) := measure_mono (iUnion₂_mono fun n _hn => disjointed_subset _ _)
_ = μ (⋃ n ∈ I, t n) := measure_biUnion_toMeasurable I.countable_toSet _
_ ≤ μ (t N) := measure_mono (iUnion₂_subset hN)
_ ≤ ⨆ n, μ (t n) := le_iSup (μ ∘ t) N
/-- Continuity from below:
the measure of the union of a monotone family of sets is equal to the supremum of their measures.
The theorem assumes that the `atTop` filter on the index set is countably generated,
so it works for a family indexed by a countable type, as well as `ℝ`. -/
theorem _root_.Monotone.measure_iUnion [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
[(atTop : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Monotone s) :
μ (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, μ (s i) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι with
| inl _ => simp
| inr _ =>
rcases exists_seq_monotone_tendsto_atTop_atTop ι with ⟨x, hxm, hx⟩
rw [← hs.iUnion_comp_tendsto_atTop hx, ← Monotone.iSup_comp_tendsto_atTop _ hx]
exacts [(hs.comp hxm).directed_le.measure_iUnion, fun _ _ h ↦ measure_mono (hs h)]
theorem _root_.Antitone.measure_iUnion [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≥ ·)]
[(atBot : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Antitone s) :
μ (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, μ (s i) :=
hs.dual_left.measure_iUnion
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of a sequence of
(not necessarily measurable) sets is the supremum of the measures of the partial unions. -/
theorem measure_iUnion_eq_iSup_accumulate [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
[(atTop : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {f : ι → Set α} :
μ (⋃ i, f i) = ⨆ i, μ (Accumulate f i) := by
rw [← iUnion_accumulate]
exact monotone_accumulate.measure_iUnion
theorem measure_biUnion_eq_iSup {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set ι} (ht : t.Countable)
(hd : DirectedOn ((· ⊆ ·) on s) t) : μ (⋃ i ∈ t, s i) = ⨆ i ∈ t, μ (s i) := by
haveI := ht.to_subtype
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, hd.directed_val.measure_iUnion, ← iSup_subtype'']
/-- **Continuity from above**:
the measure of the intersection of a directed downwards countable family of measurable sets
is the infimum of the measures. -/
theorem _root_.Directed.measure_iInter [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hd : Directed (· ⊇ ·) s) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) :
μ (⋂ i, s i) = ⨅ i, μ (s i) := by
rcases hfin with ⟨k, hk⟩
have : ∀ t ⊆ s k, μ t ≠ ∞ := fun t ht => ne_top_of_le_ne_top hk (measure_mono ht)
rw [← ENNReal.sub_sub_cancel hk (iInf_le (fun i => μ (s i)) k), ENNReal.sub_iInf, ←
ENNReal.sub_sub_cancel hk (measure_mono (iInter_subset _ k)), ←
measure_diff (iInter_subset _ k) (.iInter h) (this _ (iInter_subset _ k)),
diff_iInter, Directed.measure_iUnion]
· congr 1
refine le_antisymm (iSup_mono' fun i => ?_) (iSup_mono fun i => le_measure_diff)
rcases hd i k with ⟨j, hji, hjk⟩
use j
rw [← measure_diff hjk (h _) (this _ hjk)]
gcongr
· exact hd.mono_comp _ fun _ _ => diff_subset_diff_right
/-- **Continuity from above**:
the measure of the intersection of a monotone family of measurable sets
indexed by a type with countably generated `atBot` filter
is equal to the infimum of the measures. -/
theorem _root_.Monotone.measure_iInter [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≥ ·)]
[(atBot : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Monotone s)
(hsm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) :
μ (⋂ i, s i) = ⨅ i, μ (s i) := by
refine le_antisymm (le_iInf fun i ↦ measure_mono <| iInter_subset _ _) ?_
have := hfin.nonempty
rcases exists_seq_antitone_tendsto_atTop_atBot ι with ⟨x, hxm, hx⟩
calc
⨅ i, μ (s i) ≤ ⨅ n, μ (s (x n)) := le_iInf_comp (μ ∘ s) x
_ = μ (⋂ n, s (x n)) := by
refine .symm <| (hs.comp_antitone hxm).directed_ge.measure_iInter (fun n ↦ hsm _) ?_
rcases hfin with ⟨k, hk⟩
rcases (hx.eventually_le_atBot k).exists with ⟨n, hn⟩
exact ⟨n, ne_top_of_le_ne_top hk <| measure_mono <| hs hn⟩
_ ≤ μ (⋂ i, s i) := by
refine measure_mono <| iInter_mono' fun i ↦ ?_
rcases (hx.eventually_le_atBot i).exists with ⟨n, hn⟩
exact ⟨n, hs hn⟩
/-- **Continuity from above**:
the measure of the intersection of an antitone family of measurable sets
indexed by a type with countably generated `atTop` filter
is equal to the infimum of the measures. -/
theorem _root_.Antitone.measure_iInter [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
[(atTop : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Antitone s)
(hsm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) :
μ (⋂ i, s i) = ⨅ i, μ (s i) :=
hs.dual_left.measure_iInter hsm hfin
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a sequence of
measurable sets is the infimum of the measures of the partial intersections. -/
theorem measure_iInter_eq_iInf_measure_iInter_le {α ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α}
{μ : Measure α} [Countable ι] [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
{f : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (f i) μ) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (f i) ≠ ∞) :
μ (⋂ i, f i) = ⨅ i, μ (⋂ j ≤ i, f j) := by
rw [← Antitone.measure_iInter]
· rw [iInter_comm]
exact congrArg μ <| iInter_congr fun i ↦ (biInf_const nonempty_Ici).symm
· exact fun i j h ↦ biInter_mono (Iic_subset_Iic.2 h) fun _ _ ↦ Set.Subset.rfl
· exact fun i ↦ .biInter (to_countable _) fun _ _ ↦ h _
· refine hfin.imp fun k hk ↦ ne_top_of_le_ne_top hk <| measure_mono <| iInter₂_subset k ?_
rfl
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of an increasing sequence of (not necessarily
measurable) sets is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iUnion_atTop [Preorder ι] [IsCountablyGenerated (atTop : Filter ι)]
{s : ι → Set α} (hm : Monotone s) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋃ n, s n))) := by
refine .of_neBot_imp fun h ↦ ?_
have := (atTop_neBot_iff.1 h).2
rw [hm.measure_iUnion]
exact tendsto_atTop_iSup fun n m hnm => measure_mono <| hm hnm
theorem tendsto_measure_iUnion_atBot [Preorder ι] [IsCountablyGenerated (atBot : Filter ι)]
{s : ι → Set α} (hm : Antitone s) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atBot (𝓝 (μ (⋃ n, s n))) :=
tendsto_measure_iUnion_atTop (ι := ιᵒᵈ) hm.dual_left
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of a sequence of (not necessarily measurable)
sets is the limit of the measures of the partial unions. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iUnion_accumulate {α ι : Type*}
[Preorder ι] [IsCountablyGenerated (atTop : Filter ι)]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f : ι → Set α} :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ μ (Accumulate f i)) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋃ i, f i))) := by
refine .of_neBot_imp fun h ↦ ?_
have := (atTop_neBot_iff.1 h).2
rw [measure_iUnion_eq_iSup_accumulate]
exact tendsto_atTop_iSup fun i j hij ↦ by gcongr
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a decreasing sequence of measurable
sets is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iInter_atTop [Preorder ι]
[IsCountablyGenerated (atTop : Filter ι)] {s : ι → Set α}
(hs : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hm : Antitone s) (hf : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋂ n, s n))) := by
refine .of_neBot_imp fun h ↦ ?_
have := (atTop_neBot_iff.1 h).2
rw [hm.measure_iInter hs hf]
exact tendsto_atTop_iInf fun n m hnm => measure_mono <| hm hnm
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of an increasing sequence of measurable
sets is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iInter_atBot [Preorder ι] [IsCountablyGenerated (atBot : Filter ι)]
{s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hm : Monotone s)
(hf : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atBot (𝓝 (μ (⋂ n, s n))) :=
tendsto_measure_iInter_atTop (ι := ιᵒᵈ) hs hm.dual_left hf
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a sequence of measurable
sets such that one has finite measure is the limit of the measures of the partial intersections. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iInter_le {α ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
[Countable ι] [Preorder ι] {f : ι → Set α} (hm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (f i) μ)
(hf : ∃ i, μ (f i) ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ μ (⋂ j ≤ i, f j)) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋂ i, f i))) := by
refine .of_neBot_imp fun hne ↦ ?_
cases atTop_neBot_iff.mp hne
rw [measure_iInter_eq_iInf_measure_iInter_le hm hf]
exact tendsto_atTop_iInf
fun i j hij ↦ measure_mono <| biInter_subset_biInter_left fun k hki ↦ le_trans hki hij
/-- Some version of continuity of a measure in the empty set using the intersection along a set of
sets. -/
theorem exists_measure_iInter_lt {α ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
[SemilatticeSup ι] [Countable ι] {f : ι → Set α}
(hm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (f i) μ) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : 0 < ε) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (f i) ≠ ∞)
(hfem : ⋂ n, f n = ∅) : ∃ m, μ (⋂ n ≤ m, f n) < ε := by
let F m := μ (⋂ n ≤ m, f n)
have hFAnti : Antitone F :=
fun i j hij => measure_mono (biInter_subset_biInter_left fun k hki => le_trans hki hij)
suffices Filter.Tendsto F Filter.atTop (𝓝 0) by
rw [@ENNReal.tendsto_atTop_zero_iff_lt_of_antitone
_ (nonempty_of_exists hfin) _ _ hFAnti] at this
exact this ε hε
have hzero : μ (⋂ n, f n) = 0 := by
simp only [hfem, measure_empty]
rw [← hzero]
exact tendsto_measure_iInter_le hm hfin
/-- The measure of the intersection of a decreasing sequence of measurable
sets indexed by a linear order with first countable topology is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_biInter_gt {ι : Type*} [LinearOrder ι] [TopologicalSpace ι]
[OrderTopology ι] [DenselyOrdered ι] [FirstCountableTopology ι] {s : ι → Set α}
{a : ι} (hs : ∀ r > a, NullMeasurableSet (s r) μ) (hm : ∀ i j, a < i → i ≤ j → s i ⊆ s j)
(hf : ∃ r > a, μ (s r) ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) (𝓝[Ioi a] a) (𝓝 (μ (⋂ r > a, s r))) := by
have : (atBot : Filter (Ioi a)).IsCountablyGenerated := by
rw [← comap_coe_Ioi_nhdsGT]
infer_instance
simp_rw [← map_coe_Ioi_atBot, tendsto_map'_iff, ← mem_Ioi, biInter_eq_iInter]
apply tendsto_measure_iInter_atBot
· rwa [Subtype.forall]
· exact fun i j h ↦ hm i j i.2 h
· simpa only [Subtype.exists, exists_prop]
theorem measure_if {x : β} {t : Set β} {s : Set α} [Decidable (x ∈ t)] :
μ (if x ∈ t then s else ∅) = indicator t (fun _ => μ s) x := by split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
end
section OuterMeasure
variable [ms : MeasurableSpace α] {s t : Set α}
/-- Obtain a measure by giving an outer measure where all sets in the σ-algebra are
Carathéodory measurable. -/
def OuterMeasure.toMeasure (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) : Measure α :=
Measure.ofMeasurable (fun s _ => m s) m.empty fun _f hf hd =>
m.iUnion_eq_of_caratheodory (fun i => h _ (hf i)) hd
theorem le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory (μ : Measure α) : ms ≤ μ.toOuterMeasure.caratheodory :=
fun _s hs _t => (measure_inter_add_diff _ hs).symm
@[simp]
theorem toMeasure_toOuterMeasure (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) :
(m.toMeasure h).toOuterMeasure = m.trim :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toMeasure_apply (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : m.toMeasure h s = m s :=
m.trim_eq hs
theorem le_toMeasure_apply (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) (s : Set α) :
m s ≤ m.toMeasure h s :=
m.le_trim s
theorem toMeasure_apply₀ (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) {s : Set α}
(hs : NullMeasurableSet s (m.toMeasure h)) : m.toMeasure h s = m s := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (le_toMeasure_apply _ _ _)
rcases hs.exists_measurable_subset_ae_eq with ⟨t, hts, htm, heq⟩
calc
m.toMeasure h s = m.toMeasure h t := measure_congr heq.symm
_ = m t := toMeasure_apply m h htm
_ ≤ m s := m.mono hts
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_toMeasure {μ : Measure α} :
μ.toOuterMeasure.toMeasure (le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory _) = μ :=
Measure.ext fun _s => μ.toOuterMeasure.trim_eq
@[simp]
theorem boundedBy_measure (μ : Measure α) : OuterMeasure.boundedBy μ = μ.toOuterMeasure :=
μ.toOuterMeasure.boundedBy_eq_self
end OuterMeasure
section
variable {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} [MeasurableSpace γ]
variable {μ μ₁ μ₂ μ₃ ν ν' ν₁ ν₂ : Measure α} {s s' t : Set α}
namespace Measure
/-- If `u` is a superset of `t` with the same (finite) measure (both sets possibly non-measurable),
then for any measurable set `s` one also has `μ (t ∩ s) = μ (u ∩ s)`. -/
theorem measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq {s t u : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (h : μ t = μ u)
(htu : t ⊆ u) (ht_ne_top : μ t ≠ ∞) : μ (t ∩ s) = μ (u ∩ s) := by
rw [h] at ht_ne_top
refine le_antisymm (by gcongr) ?_
have A : μ (u ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) ≤ μ (t ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) :=
calc
μ (u ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) = μ u := measure_inter_add_diff _ hs
_ = μ t := h.symm
_ = μ (t ∩ s) + μ (t \ s) := (measure_inter_add_diff _ hs).symm
_ ≤ μ (t ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) := by gcongr
have B : μ (u \ s) ≠ ∞ := (lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono diff_subset) ht_ne_top.lt_top).ne
exact ENNReal.le_of_add_le_add_right B A
/-- The measurable superset `toMeasurable μ t` of `t` (which has the same measure as `t`)
satisfies, for any measurable set `s`, the equality `μ (toMeasurable μ t ∩ s) = μ (u ∩ s)`.
Here, we require that the measure of `t` is finite. The conclusion holds without this assumption
when the measure is s-finite (for example when it is σ-finite),
see `measure_toMeasurable_inter_of_sFinite`. -/
theorem measure_toMeasurable_inter {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) :
μ (toMeasurable μ t ∩ s) = μ (t ∩ s) :=
(measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq hs (measure_toMeasurable t).symm (subset_toMeasurable μ t)
ht).symm
/-! ### The `ℝ≥0∞`-module of measures -/
instance instZero {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Zero (Measure α) :=
⟨{ toOuterMeasure := 0
m_iUnion := fun _f _hf _hd => tsum_zero.symm
trim_le := OuterMeasure.trim_zero.le }⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_toOuterMeasure {_m : MeasurableSpace α} : (0 : Measure α).toOuterMeasure = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero {_m : MeasurableSpace α} : ⇑(0 : Measure α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma _root_.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.toMeasure_zero
[ms : MeasurableSpace α] (h : ms ≤ (0 : OuterMeasure α).caratheodory) :
(0 : OuterMeasure α).toMeasure h = 0 := by
ext s hs
simp [hs]
@[simp] lemma _root_.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.toMeasure_eq_zero {ms : MeasurableSpace α}
{μ : OuterMeasure α} (h : ms ≤ μ.caratheodory) : μ.toMeasure h = 0 ↔ μ = 0 where
mp hμ := by ext s; exact le_bot_iff.1 <| (le_toMeasure_apply _ _ _).trans_eq congr($hμ s)
mpr := by rintro rfl; simp
@[nontriviality]
lemma apply_eq_zero_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
μ s = 0 := by
rw [eq_empty_of_isEmpty s, measure_empty]
instance instSubsingleton [IsEmpty α] {m : MeasurableSpace α} : Subsingleton (Measure α) :=
⟨fun μ ν => by ext1 s _; rw [apply_eq_zero_of_isEmpty, apply_eq_zero_of_isEmpty]⟩
theorem eq_zero_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : μ = 0 :=
Subsingleton.elim μ 0
instance instInhabited {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Inhabited (Measure α) :=
⟨0⟩
instance instAdd {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Add (Measure α) :=
⟨fun μ₁ μ₂ =>
{ toOuterMeasure := μ₁.toOuterMeasure + μ₂.toOuterMeasure
m_iUnion := fun s hs hd =>
show μ₁ (⋃ i, s i) + μ₂ (⋃ i, s i) = ∑' i, (μ₁ (s i) + μ₂ (s i)) by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_add, measure_iUnion hd hs, measure_iUnion hd hs]
trim_le := by rw [OuterMeasure.trim_add, μ₁.trimmed, μ₂.trimmed] }⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_toOuterMeasure {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α) :
(μ₁ + μ₂).toOuterMeasure = μ₁.toOuterMeasure + μ₂.toOuterMeasure :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α) : ⇑(μ₁ + μ₂) = μ₁ + μ₂ :=
rfl
theorem add_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(μ₁ + μ₂) s = μ₁ s + μ₂ s :=
rfl
section SMul
variable [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
variable [SMul R' ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R' ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
instance instSMul {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : SMul R (Measure α) :=
⟨fun c μ =>
{ toOuterMeasure := c • μ.toOuterMeasure
m_iUnion := fun s hs hd => by
simp only [OuterMeasure.smul_apply, coe_toOuterMeasure, ENNReal.tsum_const_smul,
measure_iUnion hd hs]
trim_le := by rw [OuterMeasure.trim_smul, μ.trimmed] }⟩
@[simp]
theorem smul_toOuterMeasure {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : R) (μ : Measure α) :
(c • μ).toOuterMeasure = c • μ.toOuterMeasure :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : R) (μ : Measure α) : ⇑(c • μ) = c • ⇑μ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : R) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(c • μ) s = c • μ s :=
rfl
instance instSMulCommClass [SMulCommClass R R' ℝ≥0∞] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} :
SMulCommClass R R' (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => ext fun _ _ => smul_comm _ _ _⟩
instance instIsScalarTower [SMul R R'] [IsScalarTower R R' ℝ≥0∞] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} :
IsScalarTower R R' (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => ext fun _ _ => smul_assoc _ _ _⟩
instance instIsCentralScalar [SMul Rᵐᵒᵖ ℝ≥0∞] [IsCentralScalar R ℝ≥0∞] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} :
IsCentralScalar R (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ _ => ext fun _ _ => op_smul_eq_smul _ _⟩
end SMul
instance instNoZeroSMulDivisors [Zero R] [SMulWithZero R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors R ℝ≥0∞] : NoZeroSMulDivisors R (Measure α) where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero h := by simpa [Ne, ext_iff', forall_or_left] using h
instance instMulAction [Monoid R] [MulAction R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} : MulAction R (Measure α) :=
Injective.mulAction _ toOuterMeasure_injective smul_toOuterMeasure
instance instAddCommMonoid {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : AddCommMonoid (Measure α) :=
toOuterMeasure_injective.addCommMonoid toOuterMeasure zero_toOuterMeasure add_toOuterMeasure
fun _ _ => smul_toOuterMeasure _ _
/-- Coercion to function as an additive monoid homomorphism. -/
def coeAddHom {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Measure α →+ Set α → ℝ≥0∞ where
toFun := (⇑)
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
@[simp]
theorem coeAddHom_apply {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : coeAddHom μ = ⇑μ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_finset_sum {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (I : Finset ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
⇑(∑ i ∈ I, μ i) = ∑ i ∈ I, ⇑(μ i) := map_sum coeAddHom μ I
theorem finset_sum_apply {m : MeasurableSpace α} (I : Finset ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(∑ i ∈ I, μ i) s = ∑ i ∈ I, μ i s := by rw [coe_finset_sum, Finset.sum_apply]
instance instDistribMulAction [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} : DistribMulAction R (Measure α) :=
Injective.distribMulAction ⟨⟨toOuterMeasure, zero_toOuterMeasure⟩, add_toOuterMeasure⟩
toOuterMeasure_injective smul_toOuterMeasure
instance instModule [Semiring R] [Module R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Module R (Measure α) :=
Injective.module R ⟨⟨toOuterMeasure, zero_toOuterMeasure⟩, add_toOuterMeasure⟩
toOuterMeasure_injective smul_toOuterMeasure
@[simp]
theorem coe_nnreal_smul_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : ℝ≥0) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(c • μ) s = c * μ s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem nnreal_smul_coe_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : ℝ≥0) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
c • μ s = c * μ s := by
rfl
theorem ae_smul_measure {p : α → Prop} [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x) (c : R) : ∀ᵐ x ∂c • μ, p x :=
ae_iff.2 <| by rw [smul_apply, ae_iff.1 h, ← smul_one_smul ℝ≥0∞, smul_zero]
theorem ae_smul_measure_le [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞] (c : R) :
ae (c • μ) ≤ ae μ := fun _ h ↦ ae_smul_measure h c
section SMulWithZero
variable {R : Type*} [Zero R] [SMulWithZero R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors R ℝ≥0∞] {c : R} {p : α → Prop}
lemma ae_smul_measure_iff (hc : c ≠ 0) {μ : Measure α} : (∀ᵐ x ∂c • μ, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x := by
simp [ae_iff, hc]
@[simp] lemma ae_smul_measure_eq (hc : c ≠ 0) (μ : Measure α) : ae (c • μ) = ae μ := by
ext; exact ae_smul_measure_iff hc
end SMulWithZero
theorem measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq {s t : Set α} (h : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) (h' : s ⊆ t)
(h'' : (μ + ν) s = (μ + ν) t) : μ s = μ t := by
refine le_antisymm (measure_mono h') ?_
have : μ t + ν t ≤ μ s + ν t :=
calc
μ t + ν t = μ s + ν s := h''.symm
_ ≤ μ s + ν t := by gcongr
apply ENNReal.le_of_add_le_add_right _ this
exact ne_top_of_le_ne_top h (le_add_left le_rfl)
theorem measure_eq_right_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq {s t : Set α} (h : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) (h' : s ⊆ t)
(h'' : (μ + ν) s = (μ + ν) t) : ν s = ν t := by
rw [add_comm] at h'' h
exact measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq h h' h''
theorem measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) : μ (toMeasurable (μ + ν) t ∩ s) = μ (t ∩ s) := by
refine (measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq hs ?_ (subset_toMeasurable _ _) ?_).symm
· refine
measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq ?_ (subset_toMeasurable _ _)
(measure_toMeasurable t).symm
rwa [measure_toMeasurable t]
· simp only [not_or, ENNReal.add_eq_top, Pi.add_apply, Ne, coe_add] at ht
exact ht.1
theorem measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_right {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) : ν (toMeasurable (μ + ν) t ∩ s) = ν (t ∩ s) := by
rw [add_comm] at ht ⊢
exact measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left hs ht
/-! ### The complete lattice of measures -/
/-- Measures are partially ordered. -/
instance instPartialOrder {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : PartialOrder (Measure α) where
le m₁ m₂ := ∀ s, m₁ s ≤ m₂ s
le_refl _ _ := le_rfl
le_trans _ _ _ h₁ h₂ s := le_trans (h₁ s) (h₂ s)
le_antisymm _ _ h₁ h₂ := ext fun s _ => le_antisymm (h₁ s) (h₂ s)
theorem toOuterMeasure_le : μ₁.toOuterMeasure ≤ μ₂.toOuterMeasure ↔ μ₁ ≤ μ₂ := .rfl
theorem le_iff : μ₁ ≤ μ₂ ↔ ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ₁ s ≤ μ₂ s := outerMeasure_le_iff
theorem le_intro (h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → s.Nonempty → μ₁ s ≤ μ₂ s) : μ₁ ≤ μ₂ :=
le_iff.2 fun s hs ↦ s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (by rintro rfl; simp) (h s hs)
theorem le_iff' : μ₁ ≤ μ₂ ↔ ∀ s, μ₁ s ≤ μ₂ s := .rfl
theorem lt_iff : μ < ν ↔ μ ≤ ν ∧ ∃ s, MeasurableSet s ∧ μ s < ν s :=
lt_iff_le_not_le.trans <|
and_congr Iff.rfl <| by simp only [le_iff, not_forall, not_le, exists_prop]
theorem lt_iff' : μ < ν ↔ μ ≤ ν ∧ ∃ s, μ s < ν s :=
lt_iff_le_not_le.trans <| and_congr Iff.rfl <| by simp only [le_iff', not_forall, not_le]
instance instAddLeftMono {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : AddLeftMono (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ν _μ₁ _μ₂ hμ s => add_le_add_left (hμ s) _⟩
protected theorem le_add_left (h : μ ≤ ν) : μ ≤ ν' + ν := fun s => le_add_left (h s)
protected theorem le_add_right (h : μ ≤ ν) : μ ≤ ν + ν' := fun s => le_add_right (h s)
section sInf
variable {m : Set (Measure α)}
theorem sInf_caratheodory (s : Set α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
MeasurableSet[(sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m)).caratheodory] s := by
rw [OuterMeasure.sInf_eq_boundedBy_sInfGen]
refine OuterMeasure.boundedBy_caratheodory fun t => ?_
simp only [OuterMeasure.sInfGen, le_iInf_iff, forall_mem_image, measure_eq_iInf t,
coe_toOuterMeasure]
intro μ hμ u htu _hu
have hm : ∀ {s t}, s ⊆ t → OuterMeasure.sInfGen (toOuterMeasure '' m) s ≤ μ t := by
intro s t hst
rw [OuterMeasure.sInfGen_def, iInf_image]
exact iInf₂_le_of_le μ hμ <| measure_mono hst
rw [← measure_inter_add_diff u hs]
exact add_le_add (hm <| inter_subset_inter_left _ htu) (hm <| diff_subset_diff_left htu)
instance {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : InfSet (Measure α) :=
⟨fun m => (sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m)).toMeasure <| sInf_caratheodory⟩
theorem sInf_apply (hs : MeasurableSet s) : sInf m s = sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m) s :=
toMeasure_apply _ _ hs
private theorem measure_sInf_le (h : μ ∈ m) : sInf m ≤ μ :=
have : sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m) ≤ μ.toOuterMeasure := sInf_le (mem_image_of_mem _ h)
le_iff.2 fun s hs => by rw [sInf_apply hs]; exact this s
private theorem measure_le_sInf (h : ∀ μ' ∈ m, μ ≤ μ') : μ ≤ sInf m :=
have : μ.toOuterMeasure ≤ sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m) :=
le_sInf <| forall_mem_image.2 fun _ hμ ↦ toOuterMeasure_le.2 <| h _ hμ
le_iff.2 fun s hs => by rw [sInf_apply hs]; exact this s
instance instCompleteSemilatticeInf {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : CompleteSemilatticeInf (Measure α) :=
{ (by infer_instance : PartialOrder (Measure α)),
(by infer_instance : InfSet (Measure α)) with
sInf_le := fun _s _a => measure_sInf_le
le_sInf := fun _s _a => measure_le_sInf }
instance instCompleteLattice {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : CompleteLattice (Measure α) :=
{ completeLatticeOfCompleteSemilatticeInf (Measure α) with
top :=
{ toOuterMeasure := ⊤,
m_iUnion := by
intro f _ _
refine (measure_iUnion_le _).antisymm ?_
if hne : (⋃ i, f i).Nonempty then
rw [OuterMeasure.top_apply hne]
exact le_top
else
simp_all [Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
trim_le := le_top },
le_top := fun _ => toOuterMeasure_le.mp le_top
bot := 0
bot_le := fun _a _s => bot_le }
end sInf
lemma inf_apply {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(μ ⊓ ν) s = sInf {m | ∃ t, m = μ (t ∩ s) + ν (tᶜ ∩ s)} := by
-- `(μ ⊓ ν) s` is defined as `⊓ (t : ℕ → Set α) (ht : s ⊆ ⋃ n, t n), ∑' n, μ (t n) ⊓ ν (t n)`
rw [← sInf_pair, Measure.sInf_apply hs, OuterMeasure.sInf_apply
(image_nonempty.2 <| insert_nonempty μ {ν})]
refine le_antisymm (le_sInf fun m ⟨t, ht₁⟩ ↦ ?_) (le_iInf₂ fun t' ht' ↦ ?_)
· subst ht₁
-- We first show `(μ ⊓ ν) s ≤ μ (t ∩ s) + ν (tᶜ ∩ s)` for any `t : Set α`
-- For this, define the sequence `t' : ℕ → Set α` where `t' 0 = t ∩ s`, `t' 1 = tᶜ ∩ s` and
-- `∅` otherwise. Then, we have by construction
-- `(μ ⊓ ν) s ≤ ∑' n, μ (t' n) ⊓ ν (t' n) ≤ μ (t' 0) + ν (t' 1) = μ (t ∩ s) + ν (tᶜ ∩ s)`.
set t' : ℕ → Set α := fun n ↦ if n = 0 then t ∩ s else if n = 1 then tᶜ ∩ s else ∅ with ht'
refine (iInf₂_le t' fun x hx ↦ ?_).trans ?_
· by_cases hxt : x ∈ t
· refine mem_iUnion.2 ⟨0, ?_⟩
simp [hx, hxt]
· refine mem_iUnion.2 ⟨1, ?_⟩
simp [hx, hxt]
· simp only [iInf_image, coe_toOuterMeasure, iInf_pair]
rw [tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite 0, tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite 1, if_neg zero_ne_one.symm,
ENNReal.summable.tsum_eq_zero_iff.2 _, add_zero]
· exact add_le_add (inf_le_left.trans <| by simp [ht']) (inf_le_right.trans <| by simp [ht'])
· simp only [ite_eq_left_iff]
intro n hn₁ hn₀
simp only [ht', if_neg hn₀, if_neg hn₁, measure_empty, iInf_pair, le_refl, inf_of_le_left]
· simp only [iInf_image, coe_toOuterMeasure, iInf_pair]
-- Conversely, fixing `t' : ℕ → Set α` such that `s ⊆ ⋃ n, t' n`, we construct `t : Set α`
-- for which `μ (t ∩ s) + ν (tᶜ ∩ s) ≤ ∑' n, μ (t' n) ⊓ ν (t' n)`.
-- Denoting `I := {n | μ (t' n) ≤ ν (t' n)}`, we set `t = ⋃ n ∈ I, t' n`.
-- Clearly `μ (t ∩ s) ≤ ∑' n ∈ I, μ (t' n)` and `ν (tᶜ ∩ s) ≤ ∑' n ∉ I, ν (t' n)`, so
-- `μ (t ∩ s) + ν (tᶜ ∩ s) ≤ ∑' n ∈ I, μ (t' n) + ∑' n ∉ I, ν (t' n)`
-- where the RHS equals `∑' n, μ (t' n) ⊓ ν (t' n)` by the choice of `I`.
set t := ⋃ n ∈ {k : ℕ | μ (t' k) ≤ ν (t' k)}, t' n with ht
suffices hadd : μ (t ∩ s) + ν (tᶜ ∩ s) ≤ ∑' n, μ (t' n) ⊓ ν (t' n) by
exact le_trans (sInf_le ⟨t, rfl⟩) hadd
have hle₁ : μ (t ∩ s) ≤ ∑' (n : {k | μ (t' k) ≤ ν (t' k)}), μ (t' n) :=
(measure_mono inter_subset_left).trans <| measure_biUnion_le _ (to_countable _) _
have hcap : tᶜ ∩ s ⊆ ⋃ n ∈ {k | ν (t' k) < μ (t' k)}, t' n := by
simp_rw [ht, compl_iUnion]
refine fun x ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ↦ mem_iUnion₂.2 ?_
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_iUnion.1 <| ht' hx₂
refine ⟨i, ?_, hi⟩
by_contra h
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, not_lt] at h
exact mem_iInter₂.1 hx₁ i h hi
have hle₂ : ν (tᶜ ∩ s) ≤ ∑' (n : {k | ν (t' k) < μ (t' k)}), ν (t' n) :=
(measure_mono hcap).trans (measure_biUnion_le ν (to_countable {k | ν (t' k) < μ (t' k)}) _)
refine (add_le_add hle₁ hle₂).trans ?_
have heq : {k | μ (t' k) ≤ ν (t' k)} ∪ {k | ν (t' k) < μ (t' k)} = univ := by
ext k; simp [le_or_lt]
conv in ∑' (n : ℕ), μ (t' n) ⊓ ν (t' n) => rw [← tsum_univ, ← heq]
rw [ENNReal.summable.tsum_union_disjoint (f := fun n ↦ μ (t' n) ⊓ ν (t' n)) ?_ ENNReal.summable]
· refine add_le_add (tsum_congr ?_).le (tsum_congr ?_).le
· rw [Subtype.forall]
intro n hn; simpa
· rw [Subtype.forall]
intro n hn
rw [mem_setOf_eq] at hn
simp [le_of_lt hn]
· rw [Set.disjoint_iff]
rintro k ⟨hk₁, hk₂⟩
rw [mem_setOf_eq] at hk₁ hk₂
exact False.elim <| hk₂.not_le hk₁
@[simp]
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.toMeasure_top :
(⊤ : OuterMeasure α).toMeasure (by rw [OuterMeasure.top_caratheodory]; exact le_top) =
(⊤ : Measure α) :=
toOuterMeasure_toMeasure (μ := ⊤)
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_top {_ : MeasurableSpace α} :
(⊤ : Measure α).toOuterMeasure = (⊤ : OuterMeasure α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_add : ⊤ + μ = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| Measure.le_add_right le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_top : μ + ⊤ = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| Measure.le_add_left le_rfl
protected theorem zero_le {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : 0 ≤ μ :=
bot_le
theorem nonpos_iff_eq_zero' : μ ≤ 0 ↔ μ = 0 :=
μ.zero_le.le_iff_eq
@[simp]
theorem measure_univ_eq_zero : μ univ = 0 ↔ μ = 0 :=
⟨fun h => bot_unique fun s => (h ▸ measure_mono (subset_univ s) : μ s ≤ 0), fun h =>
h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
theorem measure_univ_ne_zero : μ univ ≠ 0 ↔ μ ≠ 0 :=
measure_univ_eq_zero.not
instance [NeZero μ] : NeZero (μ univ) := ⟨measure_univ_ne_zero.2 <| NeZero.ne μ⟩
@[simp]
theorem measure_univ_pos : 0 < μ univ ↔ μ ≠ 0 :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans measure_univ_ne_zero
lemma nonempty_of_neZero (μ : Measure α) [NeZero μ] : Nonempty α :=
(isEmpty_or_nonempty α).resolve_left fun h ↦ by
simpa [eq_empty_of_isEmpty] using NeZero.ne (μ univ)
section Sum
variable {f : ι → Measure α}
/-- Sum of an indexed family of measures. -/
noncomputable def sum (f : ι → Measure α) : Measure α :=
(OuterMeasure.sum fun i => (f i).toOuterMeasure).toMeasure <|
le_trans (le_iInf fun _ => le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory _)
(OuterMeasure.le_sum_caratheodory _)
theorem le_sum_apply (f : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) : ∑' i, f i s ≤ sum f s :=
le_toMeasure_apply _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sum_apply (f : ι → Measure α) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
sum f s = ∑' i, f i s :=
toMeasure_apply _ _ hs
theorem sum_apply₀ (f : ι → Measure α) {s : Set α} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s (sum f)) :
sum f s = ∑' i, f i s := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ (le_sum_apply _ _)
rcases hs.exists_measurable_subset_ae_eq with ⟨t, ts, t_meas, ht⟩
calc
sum f s = sum f t := measure_congr ht.symm
_ = ∑' i, f i t := sum_apply _ t_meas
_ ≤ ∑' i, f i s := ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun i ↦ measure_mono ts
/-! For the next theorem, the countability assumption is necessary. For a counterexample, consider
an uncountable space, with a distinguished point `x₀`, and the sigma-algebra made of countable sets
not containing `x₀`, and their complements. All points but `x₀` are measurable.
Consider the sum of the Dirac masses at points different from `x₀`, and `s = {x₀}`. For any Dirac
mass `δ_x`, we have `δ_x (x₀) = 0`, so `∑' x, δ_x (x₀) = 0`. On the other hand, the measure
`sum δ_x` gives mass one to each point different from `x₀`, so it gives infinite mass to any
measurable set containing `x₀` (as such a set is uncountable), and by outer regularity one gets
`sum δ_x {x₀} = ∞`.
-/
theorem sum_apply_of_countable [Countable ι] (f : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) :
sum f s = ∑' i, f i s := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ (le_sum_apply _ _)
rcases exists_measurable_superset_forall_eq f s with ⟨t, hst, htm, ht⟩
calc
sum f s ≤ sum f t := measure_mono hst
_ = ∑' i, f i t := sum_apply _ htm
_ = ∑' i, f i s := by simp [ht]
theorem le_sum (μ : ι → Measure α) (i : ι) : μ i ≤ sum μ :=
le_iff.2 fun s hs ↦ by simpa only [sum_apply μ hs] using ENNReal.le_tsum i
@[simp]
theorem sum_apply_eq_zero [Countable ι] {μ : ι → Measure α} {s : Set α} :
sum μ s = 0 ↔ ∀ i, μ i s = 0 := by
simp [sum_apply_of_countable]
theorem sum_apply_eq_zero' {μ : ι → Measure α} {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
sum μ s = 0 ↔ ∀ i, μ i s = 0 := by simp [hs]
@[simp] lemma sum_eq_zero : sum f = 0 ↔ ∀ i, f i = 0 := by
simp +contextual [Measure.ext_iff, forall_swap (α := ι)]
@[simp]
lemma sum_zero : Measure.sum (fun (_ : ι) ↦ (0 : Measure α)) = 0 := by
ext s hs
simp [Measure.sum_apply _ hs]
theorem sum_sum {ι' : Type*} (μ : ι → ι' → Measure α) :
(sum fun n => sum (μ n)) = sum (fun (p : ι × ι') ↦ μ p.1 p.2) := by
ext1 s hs
simp [sum_apply _ hs, ENNReal.tsum_prod']
theorem sum_comm {ι' : Type*} (μ : ι → ι' → Measure α) :
(sum fun n => sum (μ n)) = sum fun m => sum fun n => μ n m := by
ext1 s hs
simp_rw [sum_apply _ hs]
rw [ENNReal.tsum_comm]
theorem ae_sum_iff [Countable ι] {μ : ι → Measure α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂sum μ, p x) ↔ ∀ i, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ i, p x :=
sum_apply_eq_zero
theorem ae_sum_iff' {μ : ι → Measure α} {p : α → Prop} (h : MeasurableSet { x | p x }) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂sum μ, p x) ↔ ∀ i, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ i, p x :=
sum_apply_eq_zero' h.compl
@[simp]
theorem sum_fintype [Fintype ι] (μ : ι → Measure α) : sum μ = ∑ i, μ i := by
ext1 s hs
simp only [sum_apply, finset_sum_apply, hs, tsum_fintype]
theorem sum_coe_finset (s : Finset ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
(sum fun i : s => μ i) = ∑ i ∈ s, μ i := by rw [sum_fintype, Finset.sum_coe_sort s μ]
@[simp]
theorem ae_sum_eq [Countable ι] (μ : ι → Measure α) : ae (sum μ) = ⨆ i, ae (μ i) :=
Filter.ext fun _ => ae_sum_iff.trans mem_iSup.symm
theorem sum_bool (f : Bool → Measure α) : sum f = f true + f false := by
rw [sum_fintype, Fintype.sum_bool]
theorem sum_cond (μ ν : Measure α) : (sum fun b => cond b μ ν) = μ + ν :=
sum_bool _
@[simp]
theorem sum_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty ι] (μ : ι → Measure α) : sum μ = 0 := by
rw [← measure_univ_eq_zero, sum_apply _ MeasurableSet.univ, tsum_empty]
theorem sum_add_sum_compl (s : Set ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
((sum fun i : s => μ i) + sum fun i : ↥sᶜ => μ i) = sum μ := by
ext1 t ht
simp only [add_apply, sum_apply _ ht]
exact ENNReal.summable.tsum_add_tsum_compl (f := fun i => μ i t) ENNReal.summable
theorem sum_congr {μ ν : ℕ → Measure α} (h : ∀ n, μ n = ν n) : sum μ = sum ν :=
congr_arg sum (funext h)
theorem sum_add_sum {ι : Type*} (μ ν : ι → Measure α) : sum μ + sum ν = sum fun n => μ n + ν n := by
ext1 s hs
simp only [add_apply, sum_apply _ hs, Pi.add_apply, coe_add,
ENNReal.summable.tsum_add ENNReal.summable]
@[simp] lemma sum_comp_equiv {ι ι' : Type*} (e : ι' ≃ ι) (m : ι → Measure α) :
sum (m ∘ e) = sum m := by
ext s hs
simpa [hs, sum_apply] using e.tsum_eq (fun n ↦ m n s)
@[simp] lemma sum_extend_zero {ι ι' : Type*} {f : ι → ι'} (hf : Injective f) (m : ι → Measure α) :
sum (Function.extend f m 0) = sum m := by
ext s hs
simp [*, Function.apply_extend (fun μ : Measure α ↦ μ s)]
end Sum
/-! ### The `cofinite` filter -/
/-- The filter of sets `s` such that `sᶜ` has finite measure. -/
def cofinite {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : Filter α :=
comk (μ · < ∞) (by simp) (fun _ ht _ hs ↦ (measure_mono hs).trans_lt ht) fun s hs t ht ↦
(measure_union_le s t).trans_lt <| ENNReal.add_lt_top.2 ⟨hs, ht⟩
theorem mem_cofinite : s ∈ μ.cofinite ↔ μ sᶜ < ∞ :=
Iff.rfl
theorem compl_mem_cofinite : sᶜ ∈ μ.cofinite ↔ μ s < ∞ := by rw [mem_cofinite, compl_compl]
theorem eventually_cofinite {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in μ.cofinite, p x) ↔ μ { x | ¬p x } < ∞ :=
Iff.rfl
instance cofinite.instIsMeasurablyGenerated : IsMeasurablyGenerated μ.cofinite where
exists_measurable_subset s hs := by
refine ⟨(toMeasurable μ sᶜ)ᶜ, ?_, (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _).compl, ?_⟩
· rwa [compl_mem_cofinite, measure_toMeasurable]
· rw [compl_subset_comm]
apply subset_toMeasurable
end Measure
open Measure
open MeasureTheory
protected theorem _root_.AEMeasurable.nullMeasurable {f : α → β} (h : AEMeasurable f μ) :
NullMeasurable f μ :=
let ⟨_g, hgm, hg⟩ := h; hgm.nullMeasurable.congr hg.symm
lemma _root_.AEMeasurable.nullMeasurableSet_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set β}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hs : MeasurableSet s) : NullMeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' s) μ :=
hf.nullMeasurable hs
@[simp]
theorem ae_eq_bot : ae μ = ⊥ ↔ μ = 0 := by
rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_ae_iff, compl_empty, measure_univ_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem ae_neBot : (ae μ).NeBot ↔ μ ≠ 0 :=
neBot_iff.trans (not_congr ae_eq_bot)
instance Measure.ae.neBot [NeZero μ] : (ae μ).NeBot := ae_neBot.2 <| NeZero.ne μ
@[simp]
theorem ae_zero {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} : ae (0 : Measure α) = ⊥ :=
ae_eq_bot.2 rfl
section Intervals
theorem biSup_measure_Iic [Preorder α] {s : Set α} (hsc : s.Countable)
(hst : ∀ x : α, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≤ y) (hdir : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) s) :
⨆ x ∈ s, μ (Iic x) = μ univ := by
rw [← measure_biUnion_eq_iSup hsc]
· congr
simp only [← bex_def] at hst
exact iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff.2 hst
· exact directedOn_iff_directed.2 (hdir.directed_val.mono_comp _ fun x y => Iic_subset_Iic.2)
theorem tendsto_measure_Ico_atTop [Preorder α] [NoMaxOrder α]
[(atTop : Filter α).IsCountablyGenerated] (μ : Measure α) (a : α) :
Tendsto (fun x => μ (Ico a x)) atTop (𝓝 (μ (Ici a))) := by
rw [← iUnion_Ico_right]
exact tendsto_measure_iUnion_atTop (antitone_const.Ico monotone_id)
theorem tendsto_measure_Ioc_atBot [Preorder α] [NoMinOrder α]
[(atBot : Filter α).IsCountablyGenerated] (μ : Measure α) (a : α) :
Tendsto (fun x => μ (Ioc x a)) atBot (𝓝 (μ (Iic a))) := by
rw [← iUnion_Ioc_left]
exact tendsto_measure_iUnion_atBot (monotone_id.Ioc antitone_const)
theorem tendsto_measure_Iic_atTop [Preorder α] [(atTop : Filter α).IsCountablyGenerated]
(μ : Measure α) : Tendsto (fun x => μ (Iic x)) atTop (𝓝 (μ univ)) := by
rw [← iUnion_Iic]
exact tendsto_measure_iUnion_atTop monotone_Iic
theorem tendsto_measure_Ici_atBot [Preorder α] [(atBot : Filter α).IsCountablyGenerated]
(μ : Measure α) : Tendsto (fun x => μ (Ici x)) atBot (𝓝 (μ univ)) :=
tendsto_measure_Iic_atTop (α := αᵒᵈ) μ
variable [PartialOrder α] {a b : α}
theorem Iio_ae_eq_Iic' (ha : μ {a} = 0) : Iio a =ᵐ[μ] Iic a := by
rw [← Iic_diff_right, diff_ae_eq_self, measure_mono_null Set.inter_subset_right ha]
theorem Ioi_ae_eq_Ici' (ha : μ {a} = 0) : Ioi a =ᵐ[μ] Ici a :=
Iio_ae_eq_Iic' (α := αᵒᵈ) ha
theorem Ioo_ae_eq_Ioc' (hb : μ {b} = 0) : Ioo a b =ᵐ[μ] Ioc a b :=
(ae_eq_refl _).inter (Iio_ae_eq_Iic' hb)
theorem Ioc_ae_eq_Icc' (ha : μ {a} = 0) : Ioc a b =ᵐ[μ] Icc a b :=
(Ioi_ae_eq_Ici' ha).inter (ae_eq_refl _)
theorem Ioo_ae_eq_Ico' (ha : μ {a} = 0) : Ioo a b =ᵐ[μ] Ico a b :=
(Ioi_ae_eq_Ici' ha).inter (ae_eq_refl _)
theorem Ioo_ae_eq_Icc' (ha : μ {a} = 0) (hb : μ {b} = 0) : Ioo a b =ᵐ[μ] Icc a b :=
(Ioi_ae_eq_Ici' ha).inter (Iio_ae_eq_Iic' hb)
theorem Ico_ae_eq_Icc' (hb : μ {b} = 0) : Ico a b =ᵐ[μ] Icc a b :=
(ae_eq_refl _).inter (Iio_ae_eq_Iic' hb)
theorem Ico_ae_eq_Ioc' (ha : μ {a} = 0) (hb : μ {b} = 0) : Ico a b =ᵐ[μ] Ioc a b :=
(Ioo_ae_eq_Ico' ha).symm.trans (Ioo_ae_eq_Ioc' hb)
end Intervals
end
end MeasureTheory
end
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/MeasureSpace.lean | 1,712 | 1,713 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta, Edward Ayers, Thomas Read. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta, Edward Ayers, Thomas Read
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EpiMono
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.FiniteProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.BinaryProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.ChosenFiniteProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Limits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Mates
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Closed.Monoidal
/-!
# Cartesian closed categories
Given a category with chosen finite products, the cartesian monoidal structure is provided by the
instance `monoidalOfChosenFiniteProducts`.
We define exponentiable objects to be closed objects with respect to this monoidal structure,
i.e. `(X × -)` is a left adjoint.
We say a category is cartesian closed if every object is exponentiable
(equivalently, that the category equipped with the cartesian monoidal structure is closed monoidal).
Show that exponential forms a difunctor and define the exponential comparison morphisms.
## Implementation Details
Cartesian closed categories require a `ChosenFiniteProducts` instance. If one whishes to state that
a category that `hasFiniteProducts` is cartesian closed, they should first promote the
`hasFiniteProducts` instance to a `ChosenFiniteProducts` one using
`CategoryTheory.ChosenFiniteProducts.ofFiniteProducts`.
## TODO
Some of the results here are true more generally for closed objects and
for closed monoidal categories, and these could be generalised.
-/
universe v v₂ u u₂
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits MonoidalCategory
/-- An object `X` is *exponentiable* if `(X × -)` is a left adjoint.
We define this as being `Closed` in the cartesian monoidal structure.
-/
abbrev Exponentiable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [ChosenFiniteProducts C] (X : C) :=
Closed X
/-- Constructor for `Exponentiable X` which takes as an input an adjunction
`MonoidalCategory.tensorLeft X ⊣ exp` for some functor `exp : C ⥤ C`. -/
abbrev Exponentiable.mk {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [ChosenFiniteProducts C] (X : C)
(exp : C ⥤ C) (adj : MonoidalCategory.tensorLeft X ⊣ exp) :
Exponentiable X where
rightAdj := exp
adj := adj
/-- If `X` and `Y` are exponentiable then `X ⨯ Y` is.
This isn't an instance because it's not usually how we want to construct exponentials, we'll usually
prove all objects are exponential uniformly.
-/
def binaryProductExponentiable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [ChosenFiniteProducts C] {X Y : C}
(hX : Exponentiable X) (hY : Exponentiable Y) : Exponentiable (X ⊗ Y) :=
tensorClosed hX hY
/-- The terminal object is always exponentiable.
This isn't an instance because most of the time we'll prove cartesian closed for all objects
at once, rather than just for this one.
-/
def terminalExponentiable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [ChosenFiniteProducts C] :
Exponentiable (𝟙_ C) :=
unitClosed
/-- A category `C` is cartesian closed if it has finite products and every object is exponentiable.
We define this as `monoidal_closed` with respect to the cartesian monoidal structure.
-/
abbrev CartesianClosed (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] [ChosenFiniteProducts C] :=
MonoidalClosed C
-- Porting note: added to ease the port of `CategoryTheory.Closed.Types`
/-- Constructor for `CartesianClosed C`. -/
def CartesianClosed.mk (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] [ChosenFiniteProducts C]
(exp : ∀ (X : C), Exponentiable X) :
CartesianClosed C where
closed X := exp X
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] (A B : C) {X X' Y Y' Z : C}
variable [ChosenFiniteProducts C] [Exponentiable A]
/-- This is (-)^A. -/
abbrev exp : C ⥤ C :=
ihom A
namespace exp
/-- The adjunction between A ⨯ - and (-)^A. -/
abbrev adjunction : tensorLeft A ⊣ exp A :=
ihom.adjunction A
/-- The evaluation natural transformation. -/
abbrev ev : exp A ⋙ tensorLeft A ⟶ 𝟭 C :=
ihom.ev A
/-- The coevaluation natural transformation. -/
abbrev coev : 𝟭 C ⟶ tensorLeft A ⋙ exp A :=
ihom.coev A
-- Porting note: notation fails to elaborate with `quotPrecheck` on.
set_option quotPrecheck false in
/-- Morphisms obtained using an exponentiable object. -/
notation:20 A " ⟹ " B:19 => (exp A).obj B
open Lean PrettyPrinter.Delaborator SubExpr in
/-- Delaborator for `Prefunctor.obj` -/
@[app_delab Prefunctor.obj]
def delabPrefunctorObjExp : Delab := whenPPOption getPPNotation <| withOverApp 6 <| do
let e ← getExpr
guard <| e.isAppOfArity' ``Prefunctor.obj 6
let A ← withNaryArg 4 do
let e ← getExpr
guard <| e.isAppOfArity' ``Functor.toPrefunctor 5
withNaryArg 4 do
let e ← getExpr
guard <| e.isAppOfArity' ``exp 5
withNaryArg 2 delab
let B ← withNaryArg 5 delab
`($A ⟹ $B)
-- Porting note: notation fails to elaborate with `quotPrecheck` on.
set_option quotPrecheck false in
/-- Morphisms from an exponentiable object. -/
notation:30 B " ^^ " A:30 => (exp A).obj B
-- Not simp as it can already prove it.
@[reassoc]
theorem ev_coev : (A ◁ (coev A).app B) ≫ (ev A).app (A ⊗ B) = 𝟙 (A ⊗ B : C) :=
ihom.ev_coev A B
@[reassoc]
theorem coev_ev : (coev A).app (A ⟹ B) ≫ (exp A).map ((ev A).app B) = 𝟙 (A ⟹ B) :=
ihom.coev_ev A B
end exp
instance : PreservesColimits (tensorLeft A) :=
(ihom.adjunction A).leftAdjoint_preservesColimits
variable {A}
-- Wrap these in a namespace so we don't clash with the core versions.
namespace CartesianClosed
/-- Currying in a cartesian closed category. -/
def curry : (A ⊗ Y ⟶ X) → (Y ⟶ A ⟹ X) :=
(exp.adjunction A).homEquiv _ _
/-- Uncurrying in a cartesian closed category. -/
def uncurry : (Y ⟶ A ⟹ X) → (A ⊗ Y ⟶ X) :=
((exp.adjunction A).homEquiv _ _).symm
theorem homEquiv_apply_eq (f : A ⊗ Y ⟶ X) : (exp.adjunction A).homEquiv _ _ f = curry f :=
rfl
theorem homEquiv_symm_apply_eq (f : Y ⟶ A ⟹ X) :
((exp.adjunction A).homEquiv _ _).symm f = uncurry f :=
rfl
@[reassoc]
theorem curry_natural_left (f : X ⟶ X') (g : A ⊗ X' ⟶ Y) :
curry (_ ◁ f ≫ g) = f ≫ curry g :=
Adjunction.homEquiv_naturality_left _ _ _
@[reassoc]
theorem curry_natural_right (f : A ⊗ X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Y') :
curry (f ≫ g) = curry f ≫ (exp _).map g :=
Adjunction.homEquiv_naturality_right _ _ _
@[reassoc]
theorem uncurry_natural_right (f : X ⟶ A ⟹ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Y') :
uncurry (f ≫ (exp _).map g) = uncurry f ≫ g :=
Adjunction.homEquiv_naturality_right_symm _ _ _
@[reassoc]
theorem uncurry_natural_left (f : X ⟶ X') (g : X' ⟶ A ⟹ Y) :
uncurry (f ≫ g) = _ ◁ f ≫ uncurry g :=
Adjunction.homEquiv_naturality_left_symm _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem uncurry_curry (f : A ⊗ X ⟶ Y) : uncurry (curry f) = f :=
(Closed.adj.homEquiv _ _).left_inv f
@[simp]
theorem curry_uncurry (f : X ⟶ A ⟹ Y) : curry (uncurry f) = f :=
(Closed.adj.homEquiv _ _).right_inv f
theorem curry_eq_iff (f : A ⊗ Y ⟶ X) (g : Y ⟶ A ⟹ X) : curry f = g ↔ f = uncurry g :=
Adjunction.homEquiv_apply_eq (exp.adjunction A) f g
theorem eq_curry_iff (f : A ⊗ Y ⟶ X) (g : Y ⟶ A ⟹ X) : g = curry f ↔ uncurry g = f :=
Adjunction.eq_homEquiv_apply (exp.adjunction A) f g
-- I don't think these two should be simp.
theorem uncurry_eq (g : Y ⟶ A ⟹ X) : uncurry g = (A ◁ g) ≫ (exp.ev A).app X :=
rfl
theorem curry_eq (g : A ⊗ Y ⟶ X) : curry g = (exp.coev A).app Y ≫ (exp A).map g :=
rfl
theorem uncurry_id_eq_ev (A X : C) [Exponentiable A] : uncurry (𝟙 (A ⟹ X)) = (exp.ev A).app X := by
rw [uncurry_eq, whiskerLeft_id_assoc]
theorem curry_id_eq_coev (A X : C) [Exponentiable A] : curry (𝟙 _) = (exp.coev A).app X := by
rw [curry_eq, (exp A).map_id (A ⊗ _)]; apply comp_id
theorem curry_injective : Function.Injective (curry : (A ⊗ Y ⟶ X) → (Y ⟶ A ⟹ X)) :=
(Closed.adj.homEquiv _ _).injective
theorem uncurry_injective : Function.Injective (uncurry : (Y ⟶ A ⟹ X) → (A ⊗ Y ⟶ X)) :=
(Closed.adj.homEquiv _ _).symm.injective
end CartesianClosed
open CartesianClosed
/-- The exponential with the terminal object is naturally isomorphic to the identity. The typeclass
argument is explicit: any instance can be used. -/
def expUnitNatIso [Exponentiable (𝟙_ C)] : 𝟭 C ≅ exp (𝟙_ C) :=
MonoidalClosed.unitNatIso (C := C)
/-- The exponential of any object with the terminal object is isomorphic to itself, i.e. `X^1 ≅ X`.
The typeclass argument is explicit: any instance can be used. -/
def expUnitIsoSelf [Exponentiable (𝟙_ C)] : (𝟙_ C) ⟹ X ≅ X :=
(expUnitNatIso.app X).symm
/-- The internal element which points at the given morphism. -/
def internalizeHom (f : A ⟶ Y) : 𝟙_ C ⟶ A ⟹ Y :=
CartesianClosed.curry (ChosenFiniteProducts.fst _ _ ≫ f)
section Pre
variable {B}
/-- Pre-compose an internal hom with an external hom. -/
def pre (f : B ⟶ A) [Exponentiable B] : exp A ⟶ exp B :=
conjugateEquiv (exp.adjunction _) (exp.adjunction _) ((tensoringLeft _).map f)
theorem prod_map_pre_app_comp_ev (f : B ⟶ A) [Exponentiable B] (X : C) :
(B ◁ (pre f).app X) ≫ (exp.ev B).app X =
f ▷ (A ⟹ X) ≫ (exp.ev A).app X :=
conjugateEquiv_counit _ _ ((tensoringLeft _).map f) X
theorem uncurry_pre (f : B ⟶ A) [Exponentiable B] (X : C) :
CartesianClosed.uncurry ((pre f).app X) = f ▷ _ ≫ (exp.ev A).app X := by
rw [uncurry_eq, prod_map_pre_app_comp_ev]
theorem coev_app_comp_pre_app (f : B ⟶ A) [Exponentiable B] :
(exp.coev A).app X ≫ (pre f).app (A ⊗ X) =
(exp.coev B).app X ≫ (exp B).map (f ⊗ 𝟙 _) :=
unit_conjugateEquiv _ _ ((tensoringLeft _).map f) X
@[simp]
theorem pre_id (A : C) [Exponentiable A] : pre (𝟙 A) = 𝟙 _ := by
simp only [pre, Functor.map_id]
aesop_cat
@[simp]
theorem pre_map {A₁ A₂ A₃ : C} [Exponentiable A₁] [Exponentiable A₂] [Exponentiable A₃]
(f : A₁ ⟶ A₂) (g : A₂ ⟶ A₃) : pre (f ≫ g) = pre g ≫ pre f := by
rw [pre, pre, pre, conjugateEquiv_comp]
simp
end Pre
/-- The internal hom functor given by the cartesian closed structure. -/
def internalHom [CartesianClosed C] : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ C ⥤ C where
obj X := exp X.unop
map f := pre f.unop
/-- If an initial object `I` exists in a CCC, then `A ⨯ I ≅ I`. -/
@[simps]
def zeroMul {I : C} (t : IsInitial I) : A ⊗ I ≅ I where
hom := ChosenFiniteProducts.snd _ _
inv := t.to _
hom_inv_id := by
have : ChosenFiniteProducts.snd A I = CartesianClosed.uncurry (t.to _) := by
rw [← curry_eq_iff]
apply t.hom_ext
rw [this, ← uncurry_natural_right, ← eq_curry_iff]
apply t.hom_ext
inv_hom_id := t.hom_ext _ _
/-- If an initial object `0` exists in a CCC, then `0 ⨯ A ≅ 0`. -/
def mulZero {I : C} (t : IsInitial I) : I ⊗ A ≅ I :=
β_ _ _ ≪≫ zeroMul t
/-- If an initial object `0` exists in a CCC then `0^B ≅ 1` for any `B`. -/
def powZero {I : C} (t : IsInitial I) [CartesianClosed C] : I ⟹ B ≅ 𝟙_ C where
hom := default
inv := CartesianClosed.curry ((mulZero t).hom ≫ t.to _)
hom_inv_id := by
rw [← curry_natural_left, curry_eq_iff, ← cancel_epi (mulZero t).inv]
apply t.hom_ext
-- TODO: Generalise the below to its commuted variants.
-- TODO: Define a distributive category, so that zero_mul and friends can be derived from this.
/-- In a CCC with binary coproducts, the distribution morphism is an isomorphism. -/
noncomputable def prodCoprodDistrib [HasBinaryCoproducts C] [CartesianClosed C] (X Y Z : C) :
(Z ⊗ X) ⨿ Z ⊗ Y ≅ Z ⊗ (X ⨿ Y) where
hom := coprod.desc (_ ◁ coprod.inl) (_ ◁ coprod.inr)
inv :=
CartesianClosed.uncurry
(coprod.desc (CartesianClosed.curry coprod.inl) (CartesianClosed.curry coprod.inr))
hom_inv_id := by
ext
· rw [coprod.inl_desc_assoc, comp_id, ← uncurry_natural_left, coprod.inl_desc, uncurry_curry]
rw [coprod.inr_desc_assoc, comp_id, ← uncurry_natural_left, coprod.inr_desc, uncurry_curry]
inv_hom_id := by
rw [← uncurry_natural_right, ← eq_curry_iff]
ext
· rw [coprod.inl_desc_assoc, ← curry_natural_right, coprod.inl_desc, ← curry_natural_left,
comp_id]
rw [coprod.inr_desc_assoc, ← curry_natural_right, coprod.inr_desc, ← curry_natural_left,
comp_id]
/-- If an initial object `I` exists in a CCC then it is a strict initial object,
i.e. any morphism to `I` is an iso.
This actually shows a slightly stronger version: any morphism to an initial object from an
exponentiable object is an isomorphism.
-/
theorem strict_initial {I : C} (t : IsInitial I) (f : A ⟶ I) : IsIso f := by
haveI : Mono f := by
rw [← ChosenFiniteProducts.lift_snd (𝟙 A) f, ← zeroMul_hom t]
exact mono_comp _ _
haveI : IsSplitEpi f := IsSplitEpi.mk' ⟨t.to _, t.hom_ext _ _⟩
apply isIso_of_mono_of_isSplitEpi
instance to_initial_isIso [HasInitial C] (f : A ⟶ ⊥_ C) : IsIso f :=
strict_initial initialIsInitial _
/-- If an initial object `0` exists in a CCC then every morphism from it is monic. -/
theorem initial_mono {I : C} (B : C) (t : IsInitial I) [CartesianClosed C] : Mono (t.to B) :=
⟨fun g h _ => by
haveI := strict_initial t g
haveI := strict_initial t h
exact eq_of_inv_eq_inv (t.hom_ext _ _)⟩
instance Initial.mono_to [HasInitial C] (B : C) [CartesianClosed C] : Mono (initial.to B) :=
initial_mono B initialIsInitial
variable {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D]
section Functor
variable [ChosenFiniteProducts D]
/-- Transport the property of being cartesian closed across an equivalence of categories.
Note we didn't require any coherence between the choice of finite products here, since we transport
along the `prodComparison` isomorphism.
-/
noncomputable def cartesianClosedOfEquiv (e : C ≌ D) [CartesianClosed C] : CartesianClosed D :=
letI : e.inverse.Monoidal := .ofChosenFiniteProducts _
MonoidalClosed.ofEquiv e.inverse e.symm.toAdjunction
end Functor
end CategoryTheory
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Closed/Cartesian.lean | 392 | 396 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Associated
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Regular
/-!
# Monoids with normalization functions, `gcd`, and `lcm`
This file defines extra structures on `CancelCommMonoidWithZero`s, including `IsDomain`s.
## Main Definitions
* `NormalizationMonoid`
* `GCDMonoid`
* `NormalizedGCDMonoid`
* `gcdMonoidOfGCD`, `gcdMonoidOfExistsGCD`, `normalizedGCDMonoidOfGCD`,
`normalizedGCDMonoidOfExistsGCD`
* `gcdMonoidOfLCM`, `gcdMonoidOfExistsLCM`, `normalizedGCDMonoidOfLCM`,
`normalizedGCDMonoidOfExistsLCM`
For the `NormalizedGCDMonoid` instances on `ℕ` and `ℤ`, see `Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Nat`.
## Implementation Notes
* `NormalizationMonoid` is defined by assigning to each element a `normUnit` such that multiplying
by that unit normalizes the monoid, and `normalize` is an idempotent monoid homomorphism. This
definition as currently implemented does casework on `0`.
* `GCDMonoid` contains the definitions of `gcd` and `lcm` with the usual properties. They are
both determined up to a unit.
* `NormalizedGCDMonoid` extends `NormalizationMonoid`, so the `gcd` and `lcm` are always
normalized. This makes `gcd`s of polynomials easier to work with, but excludes Euclidean domains,
and monoids without zero.
* `gcdMonoidOfGCD` and `normalizedGCDMonoidOfGCD` noncomputably construct a `GCDMonoid`
(resp. `NormalizedGCDMonoid`) structure just from the `gcd` and its properties.
* `gcdMonoidOfExistsGCD` and `normalizedGCDMonoidOfExistsGCD` noncomputably construct a
`GCDMonoid` (resp. `NormalizedGCDMonoid`) structure just from a proof that any two elements
have a (not necessarily normalized) `gcd`.
* `gcdMonoidOfLCM` and `normalizedGCDMonoidOfLCM` noncomputably construct a `GCDMonoid`
(resp. `NormalizedGCDMonoid`) structure just from the `lcm` and its properties.
* `gcdMonoidOfExistsLCM` and `normalizedGCDMonoidOfExistsLCM` noncomputably construct a
`GCDMonoid` (resp. `NormalizedGCDMonoid`) structure just from a proof that any two elements
have a (not necessarily normalized) `lcm`.
## TODO
* Port GCD facts about nats, definition of coprime
* Generalize normalization monoids to commutative (cancellative) monoids with or without zero
## Tags
divisibility, gcd, lcm, normalize
-/
variable {α : Type*}
/-- Normalization monoid: multiplying with `normUnit` gives a normal form for associated
elements. -/
class NormalizationMonoid (α : Type*) [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] where
/-- `normUnit` assigns to each element of the monoid a unit of the monoid. -/
normUnit : α → αˣ
/-- The proposition that `normUnit` maps `0` to the identity. -/
normUnit_zero : normUnit 0 = 1
/-- The proposition that `normUnit` respects multiplication of non-zero elements. -/
normUnit_mul : ∀ {a b}, a ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 → normUnit (a * b) = normUnit a * normUnit b
/-- The proposition that `normUnit` maps units to their inverses. -/
normUnit_coe_units : ∀ u : αˣ, normUnit u = u⁻¹
export NormalizationMonoid (normUnit normUnit_zero normUnit_mul normUnit_coe_units)
attribute [simp] normUnit_coe_units normUnit_zero normUnit_mul
section NormalizationMonoid
variable [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] [NormalizationMonoid α]
@[simp]
theorem normUnit_one : normUnit (1 : α) = 1 :=
normUnit_coe_units 1
/-- Chooses an element of each associate class, by multiplying by `normUnit` -/
def normalize : α →*₀ α where
toFun x := x * normUnit x
map_zero' := by
simp only [normUnit_zero]
exact mul_one (0 : α)
map_one' := by rw [normUnit_one, one_mul]; rfl
map_mul' x y :=
(by_cases fun hx : x = 0 => by rw [hx, zero_mul, zero_mul, zero_mul]) fun hx =>
(by_cases fun hy : y = 0 => by rw [hy, mul_zero, zero_mul, mul_zero]) fun hy => by
simp only [normUnit_mul hx hy, Units.val_mul]; simp only [mul_assoc, mul_left_comm y]
theorem associated_normalize (x : α) : Associated x (normalize x) :=
⟨_, rfl⟩
theorem normalize_associated (x : α) : Associated (normalize x) x :=
(associated_normalize _).symm
theorem associated_normalize_iff {x y : α} : Associated x (normalize y) ↔ Associated x y :=
⟨fun h => h.trans (normalize_associated y), fun h => h.trans (associated_normalize y)⟩
theorem normalize_associated_iff {x y : α} : Associated (normalize x) y ↔ Associated x y :=
⟨fun h => (associated_normalize _).trans h, fun h => (normalize_associated _).trans h⟩
theorem Associates.mk_normalize (x : α) : Associates.mk (normalize x) = Associates.mk x :=
Associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated.2 (normalize_associated _)
theorem normalize_apply (x : α) : normalize x = x * normUnit x :=
rfl
theorem normalize_zero : normalize (0 : α) = 0 :=
normalize.map_zero
theorem normalize_one : normalize (1 : α) = 1 :=
normalize.map_one
theorem normalize_coe_units (u : αˣ) : normalize (u : α) = 1 := by simp [normalize_apply]
theorem normalize_eq_zero {x : α} : normalize x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨fun hx => (associated_zero_iff_eq_zero x).1 <| hx ▸ associated_normalize _, by
rintro rfl; exact normalize_zero⟩
theorem normalize_eq_one {x : α} : normalize x = 1 ↔ IsUnit x :=
⟨fun hx => isUnit_iff_exists_inv.2 ⟨_, hx⟩, fun ⟨u, hu⟩ => hu ▸ normalize_coe_units u⟩
@[simp]
theorem normUnit_mul_normUnit (a : α) : normUnit (a * normUnit a) = 1 := by
nontriviality α using Subsingleton.elim a 0
obtain rfl | h := eq_or_ne a 0
· rw [normUnit_zero, zero_mul, normUnit_zero]
· rw [normUnit_mul h (Units.ne_zero _), normUnit_coe_units, mul_inv_eq_one]
@[simp]
theorem normalize_idem (x : α) : normalize (normalize x) = normalize x := by simp [normalize_apply]
theorem normalize_eq_normalize {a b : α} (hab : a ∣ b) (hba : b ∣ a) :
normalize a = normalize b := by
nontriviality α
rcases associated_of_dvd_dvd hab hba with ⟨u, rfl⟩
refine by_cases (by rintro rfl; simp only [zero_mul]) fun ha : a ≠ 0 => ?_
suffices a * ↑(normUnit a) = a * ↑u * ↑(normUnit a) * ↑u⁻¹ by
simpa only [normalize_apply, mul_assoc, normUnit_mul ha u.ne_zero, normUnit_coe_units]
calc
a * ↑(normUnit a) = a * ↑(normUnit a) * ↑u * ↑u⁻¹ := (Units.mul_inv_cancel_right _ _).symm
_ = a * ↑u * ↑(normUnit a) * ↑u⁻¹ := by rw [mul_right_comm a]
theorem normalize_eq_normalize_iff {x y : α} : normalize x = normalize y ↔ x ∣ y ∧ y ∣ x :=
⟨fun h => ⟨Units.dvd_mul_right.1 ⟨_, h.symm⟩, Units.dvd_mul_right.1 ⟨_, h⟩⟩, fun ⟨hxy, hyx⟩ =>
normalize_eq_normalize hxy hyx⟩
theorem dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq {a b : α} (ha : normalize a = a) (hb : normalize b = b)
(hab : a ∣ b) (hba : b ∣ a) : a = b :=
ha ▸ hb ▸ normalize_eq_normalize hab hba
theorem Associated.eq_of_normalized
{a b : α} (h : Associated a b) (ha : normalize a = a) (hb : normalize b = b) :
a = b :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq ha hb h.dvd h.dvd'
@[simp]
theorem dvd_normalize_iff {a b : α} : a ∣ normalize b ↔ a ∣ b :=
Units.dvd_mul_right
@[simp]
theorem normalize_dvd_iff {a b : α} : normalize a ∣ b ↔ a ∣ b :=
Units.mul_right_dvd
end NormalizationMonoid
namespace Associates
variable [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] [NormalizationMonoid α]
/-- Maps an element of `Associates` back to the normalized element of its associate class -/
protected def out : Associates α → α :=
(Quotient.lift (normalize : α → α)) fun a _ ⟨_, hu⟩ =>
hu ▸ normalize_eq_normalize ⟨_, rfl⟩ (Units.mul_right_dvd.2 <| dvd_refl a)
@[simp]
theorem out_mk (a : α) : (Associates.mk a).out = normalize a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem out_one : (1 : Associates α).out = 1 :=
normalize_one
theorem out_mul (a b : Associates α) : (a * b).out = a.out * b.out :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun _ _ => by
simp only [Associates.quotient_mk_eq_mk, out_mk, mk_mul_mk, normalize.map_mul]
theorem dvd_out_iff (a : α) (b : Associates α) : a ∣ b.out ↔ Associates.mk a ≤ b :=
Quotient.inductionOn b <| by
simp [Associates.out_mk, Associates.quotient_mk_eq_mk, mk_le_mk_iff_dvd]
theorem out_dvd_iff (a : α) (b : Associates α) : b.out ∣ a ↔ b ≤ Associates.mk a :=
Quotient.inductionOn b <| by
simp [Associates.out_mk, Associates.quotient_mk_eq_mk, mk_le_mk_iff_dvd]
@[simp]
theorem out_top : (⊤ : Associates α).out = 0 :=
normalize_zero
@[simp]
theorem normalize_out (a : Associates α) : normalize a.out = a.out :=
Quotient.inductionOn a normalize_idem
@[simp]
theorem mk_out (a : Associates α) : Associates.mk a.out = a :=
Quotient.inductionOn a mk_normalize
theorem out_injective : Function.Injective (Associates.out : _ → α) :=
Function.LeftInverse.injective mk_out
end Associates
/-- GCD monoid: a `CancelCommMonoidWithZero` with `gcd` (greatest common divisor) and
`lcm` (least common multiple) operations, determined up to a unit. The type class focuses on `gcd`
and we derive the corresponding `lcm` facts from `gcd`.
-/
class GCDMonoid (α : Type*) [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] where
/-- The greatest common divisor between two elements. -/
gcd : α → α → α
/-- The least common multiple between two elements. -/
lcm : α → α → α
/-- The GCD is a divisor of the first element. -/
gcd_dvd_left : ∀ a b, gcd a b ∣ a
/-- The GCD is a divisor of the second element. -/
gcd_dvd_right : ∀ a b, gcd a b ∣ b
/-- Any common divisor of both elements is a divisor of the GCD. -/
dvd_gcd : ∀ {a b c}, a ∣ c → a ∣ b → a ∣ gcd c b
/-- The product of two elements is `Associated` with the product of their GCD and LCM. -/
gcd_mul_lcm : ∀ a b, Associated (gcd a b * lcm a b) (a * b)
/-- `0` is left-absorbing. -/
lcm_zero_left : ∀ a, lcm 0 a = 0
/-- `0` is right-absorbing. -/
lcm_zero_right : ∀ a, lcm a 0 = 0
/-- Normalized GCD monoid: a `CancelCommMonoidWithZero` with normalization and `gcd`
(greatest common divisor) and `lcm` (least common multiple) operations. In this setting `gcd` and
`lcm` form a bounded lattice on the associated elements where `gcd` is the infimum, `lcm` is the
supremum, `1` is bottom, and `0` is top. The type class focuses on `gcd` and we derive the
corresponding `lcm` facts from `gcd`.
-/
class NormalizedGCDMonoid (α : Type*) [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] extends NormalizationMonoid α,
GCDMonoid α where
/-- The GCD is normalized to itself. -/
normalize_gcd : ∀ a b, normalize (gcd a b) = gcd a b
/-- The LCM is normalized to itself. -/
normalize_lcm : ∀ a b, normalize (lcm a b) = lcm a b
export GCDMonoid (gcd lcm gcd_dvd_left gcd_dvd_right dvd_gcd lcm_zero_left lcm_zero_right)
attribute [simp] lcm_zero_left lcm_zero_right
section GCDMonoid
variable [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α]
instance [NormalizationMonoid α] : Nonempty (NormalizationMonoid α) := ⟨‹_›⟩
instance [GCDMonoid α] : Nonempty (GCDMonoid α) := ⟨‹_›⟩
instance [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] : Nonempty (NormalizedGCDMonoid α) := ⟨‹_›⟩
instance [h : Nonempty (NormalizedGCDMonoid α)] : Nonempty (NormalizationMonoid α) :=
h.elim fun _ ↦ inferInstance
instance [h : Nonempty (NormalizedGCDMonoid α)] : Nonempty (GCDMonoid α) :=
h.elim fun _ ↦ inferInstance
theorem gcd_isUnit_iff_isRelPrime [GCDMonoid α] {a b : α} :
IsUnit (gcd a b) ↔ IsRelPrime a b :=
⟨fun h _ ha hb ↦ isUnit_of_dvd_unit (dvd_gcd ha hb) h, (· (gcd_dvd_left a b) (gcd_dvd_right a b))⟩
@[simp]
theorem normalize_gcd [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] : ∀ a b : α, normalize (gcd a b) = gcd a b :=
NormalizedGCDMonoid.normalize_gcd
theorem gcd_mul_lcm [GCDMonoid α] : ∀ a b : α, Associated (gcd a b * lcm a b) (a * b) :=
GCDMonoid.gcd_mul_lcm
section GCD
theorem dvd_gcd_iff [GCDMonoid α] (a b c : α) : a ∣ gcd b c ↔ a ∣ b ∧ a ∣ c :=
Iff.intro (fun h => ⟨h.trans (gcd_dvd_left _ _), h.trans (gcd_dvd_right _ _)⟩) fun ⟨hab, hac⟩ =>
dvd_gcd hab hac
theorem gcd_comm [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b : α) : gcd a b = gcd b a :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) (normalize_gcd _ _)
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (gcd_dvd_left _ _))
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (gcd_dvd_left _ _))
theorem gcd_comm' [GCDMonoid α] (a b : α) : Associated (gcd a b) (gcd b a) :=
associated_of_dvd_dvd (dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (gcd_dvd_left _ _))
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (gcd_dvd_left _ _))
theorem gcd_assoc [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : gcd (gcd m n) k = gcd m (gcd n k) :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) (normalize_gcd _ _)
(dvd_gcd ((gcd_dvd_left (gcd m n) k).trans (gcd_dvd_left m n))
(dvd_gcd ((gcd_dvd_left (gcd m n) k).trans (gcd_dvd_right m n)) (gcd_dvd_right (gcd m n) k)))
(dvd_gcd
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_left m (gcd n k)) ((gcd_dvd_right m (gcd n k)).trans (gcd_dvd_left n k)))
((gcd_dvd_right m (gcd n k)).trans (gcd_dvd_right n k)))
theorem gcd_assoc' [GCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : Associated (gcd (gcd m n) k) (gcd m (gcd n k)) :=
associated_of_dvd_dvd
(dvd_gcd ((gcd_dvd_left (gcd m n) k).trans (gcd_dvd_left m n))
(dvd_gcd ((gcd_dvd_left (gcd m n) k).trans (gcd_dvd_right m n)) (gcd_dvd_right (gcd m n) k)))
(dvd_gcd
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_left m (gcd n k)) ((gcd_dvd_right m (gcd n k)).trans (gcd_dvd_left n k)))
((gcd_dvd_right m (gcd n k)).trans (gcd_dvd_right n k)))
instance [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] : Std.Commutative (α := α) gcd where
comm := gcd_comm
instance [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] : Std.Associative (α := α) gcd where
assoc := gcd_assoc
theorem gcd_eq_normalize [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] {a b c : α} (habc : gcd a b ∣ c)
(hcab : c ∣ gcd a b) : gcd a b = normalize c :=
normalize_gcd a b ▸ normalize_eq_normalize habc hcab
@[simp]
theorem gcd_zero_left [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a : α) : gcd 0 a = normalize a :=
gcd_eq_normalize (gcd_dvd_right 0 a) (dvd_gcd (dvd_zero _) (dvd_refl a))
theorem gcd_zero_left' [GCDMonoid α] (a : α) : Associated (gcd 0 a) a :=
associated_of_dvd_dvd (gcd_dvd_right 0 a) (dvd_gcd (dvd_zero _) (dvd_refl a))
@[simp]
theorem gcd_zero_right [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a : α) : gcd a 0 = normalize a :=
gcd_eq_normalize (gcd_dvd_left a 0) (dvd_gcd (dvd_refl a) (dvd_zero _))
theorem gcd_zero_right' [GCDMonoid α] (a : α) : Associated (gcd a 0) a :=
associated_of_dvd_dvd (gcd_dvd_left a 0) (dvd_gcd (dvd_refl a) (dvd_zero _))
@[simp]
theorem gcd_eq_zero_iff [GCDMonoid α] (a b : α) : gcd a b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
Iff.intro
(fun h => by
let ⟨ca, ha⟩ := gcd_dvd_left a b
let ⟨cb, hb⟩ := gcd_dvd_right a b
rw [h, zero_mul] at ha hb
exact ⟨ha, hb⟩)
fun ⟨ha, hb⟩ => by
rw [ha, hb, ← zero_dvd_iff]
apply dvd_gcd <;> rfl
theorem gcd_ne_zero_of_left [GCDMonoid α] {a b : α} (ha : a ≠ 0) : gcd a b ≠ 0 := by
simp_all
theorem gcd_ne_zero_of_right [GCDMonoid α] {a b : α} (hb : b ≠ 0) : gcd a b ≠ 0 := by
simp_all
@[simp]
theorem gcd_one_left [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a : α) : gcd 1 a = 1 :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) normalize_one (gcd_dvd_left _ _) (one_dvd _)
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_gcd_one_left [GCDMonoid α] (a : α) : IsUnit (gcd 1 a) :=
isUnit_of_dvd_one (gcd_dvd_left _ _)
theorem gcd_one_left' [GCDMonoid α] (a : α) : Associated (gcd 1 a) 1 := by simp
@[simp]
theorem gcd_one_right [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a : α) : gcd a 1 = 1 :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) normalize_one (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (one_dvd _)
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_gcd_one_right [GCDMonoid α] (a : α) : IsUnit (gcd a 1) :=
isUnit_of_dvd_one (gcd_dvd_right _ _)
theorem gcd_one_right' [GCDMonoid α] (a : α) : Associated (gcd a 1) 1 := by simp
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd [GCDMonoid α] {a b c d : α} (hab : a ∣ b) (hcd : c ∣ d) : gcd a c ∣ gcd b d :=
dvd_gcd ((gcd_dvd_left _ _).trans hab) ((gcd_dvd_right _ _).trans hcd)
protected theorem Associated.gcd [GCDMonoid α]
{a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : α} (ha : Associated a₁ a₂) (hb : Associated b₁ b₂) :
Associated (gcd a₁ b₁) (gcd a₂ b₂) :=
associated_of_dvd_dvd (gcd_dvd_gcd ha.dvd hb.dvd) (gcd_dvd_gcd ha.dvd' hb.dvd')
@[simp]
theorem gcd_same [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a : α) : gcd a a = normalize a :=
gcd_eq_normalize (gcd_dvd_left _ _) (dvd_gcd (dvd_refl a) (dvd_refl a))
@[simp]
theorem gcd_mul_left [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b c : α) :
gcd (a * b) (a * c) = normalize a * gcd b c :=
(by_cases (by rintro rfl; simp only [zero_mul, gcd_zero_left, normalize_zero]))
fun ha : a ≠ 0 =>
suffices gcd (a * b) (a * c) = normalize (a * gcd b c) by simpa
let ⟨d, eq⟩ := dvd_gcd (dvd_mul_right a b) (dvd_mul_right a c)
gcd_eq_normalize
(eq.symm ▸ mul_dvd_mul_left a
(show d ∣ gcd b c from
dvd_gcd ((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left ha).1 <| eq ▸ gcd_dvd_left _ _)
((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left ha).1 <| eq ▸ gcd_dvd_right _ _)))
(dvd_gcd (mul_dvd_mul_left a <| gcd_dvd_left _ _) (mul_dvd_mul_left a <| gcd_dvd_right _ _))
theorem gcd_mul_left' [GCDMonoid α] (a b c : α) :
Associated (gcd (a * b) (a * c)) (a * gcd b c) := by
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a 0
· simp only [zero_mul, gcd_zero_left']
obtain ⟨d, eq⟩ := dvd_gcd (dvd_mul_right a b) (dvd_mul_right a c)
apply associated_of_dvd_dvd
· rw [eq]
apply mul_dvd_mul_left
exact
dvd_gcd ((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left ha).1 <| eq ▸ gcd_dvd_left _ _)
((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left ha).1 <| eq ▸ gcd_dvd_right _ _)
· exact dvd_gcd (mul_dvd_mul_left a <| gcd_dvd_left _ _) (mul_dvd_mul_left a <| gcd_dvd_right _ _)
@[simp]
theorem gcd_mul_right [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b c : α) :
gcd (b * a) (c * a) = gcd b c * normalize a := by simp only [mul_comm, gcd_mul_left]
@[simp]
theorem gcd_mul_right' [GCDMonoid α] (a b c : α) :
Associated (gcd (b * a) (c * a)) (gcd b c * a) := by
simp only [mul_comm, gcd_mul_left']
theorem gcd_eq_left_iff [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b : α) (h : normalize a = a) :
gcd a b = a ↔ a ∣ b :=
(Iff.intro fun eq => eq ▸ gcd_dvd_right _ _) fun hab =>
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) h (gcd_dvd_left _ _) (dvd_gcd (dvd_refl a) hab)
theorem gcd_eq_right_iff [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b : α) (h : normalize b = b) :
gcd a b = b ↔ b ∣ a := by simpa only [gcd_comm a b] using gcd_eq_left_iff b a h
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left [GCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : gcd m n ∣ gcd (k * m) n :=
gcd_dvd_gcd (dvd_mul_left _ _) dvd_rfl
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right [GCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : gcd m n ∣ gcd (m * k) n :=
gcd_dvd_gcd (dvd_mul_right _ _) dvd_rfl
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left_right [GCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : gcd m n ∣ gcd m (k * n) :=
gcd_dvd_gcd dvd_rfl (dvd_mul_left _ _)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right_right [GCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : gcd m n ∣ gcd m (n * k) :=
gcd_dvd_gcd dvd_rfl (dvd_mul_right _ _)
theorem Associated.gcd_eq_left [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] {m n : α} (h : Associated m n) (k : α) :
gcd m k = gcd n k :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) (normalize_gcd _ _) (gcd_dvd_gcd h.dvd dvd_rfl)
(gcd_dvd_gcd h.symm.dvd dvd_rfl)
theorem Associated.gcd_eq_right [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] {m n : α} (h : Associated m n) (k : α) :
gcd k m = gcd k n :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) (normalize_gcd _ _) (gcd_dvd_gcd dvd_rfl h.dvd)
(gcd_dvd_gcd dvd_rfl h.symm.dvd)
theorem dvd_gcd_mul_of_dvd_mul [GCDMonoid α] {m n k : α} (H : k ∣ m * n) : k ∣ gcd k m * n :=
(dvd_gcd (dvd_mul_right _ n) H).trans (gcd_mul_right' n k m).dvd
theorem dvd_gcd_mul_iff_dvd_mul [GCDMonoid α] {m n k : α} : k ∣ gcd k m * n ↔ k ∣ m * n :=
⟨fun h => h.trans (mul_dvd_mul (gcd_dvd_right k m) dvd_rfl), dvd_gcd_mul_of_dvd_mul⟩
theorem dvd_mul_gcd_of_dvd_mul [GCDMonoid α] {m n k : α} (H : k ∣ m * n) : k ∣ m * gcd k n := by
rw [mul_comm] at H ⊢
exact dvd_gcd_mul_of_dvd_mul H
theorem dvd_mul_gcd_iff_dvd_mul [GCDMonoid α] {m n k : α} : k ∣ m * gcd k n ↔ k ∣ m * n :=
⟨fun h => h.trans (mul_dvd_mul dvd_rfl (gcd_dvd_right k n)), dvd_mul_gcd_of_dvd_mul⟩
/-- Represent a divisor of `m * n` as a product of a divisor of `m` and a divisor of `n`.
Note: In general, this representation is highly non-unique.
See `Nat.dvdProdDvdOfDvdProd` for a constructive version on `ℕ`. -/
instance [h : Nonempty (GCDMonoid α)] : DecompositionMonoid α where
primal k m n H := by
cases h
by_cases h0 : gcd k m = 0
· rw [gcd_eq_zero_iff] at h0
rcases h0 with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact ⟨0, n, dvd_refl 0, dvd_refl n, by simp⟩
· obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := gcd_dvd_left k m
refine ⟨gcd k m, a, gcd_dvd_right _ _, ?_, ha⟩
rw [← mul_dvd_mul_iff_left h0, ← ha]
exact dvd_gcd_mul_of_dvd_mul H
theorem gcd_mul_dvd_mul_gcd [GCDMonoid α] (k m n : α) : gcd k (m * n) ∣ gcd k m * gcd k n := by
obtain ⟨m', n', hm', hn', h⟩ := exists_dvd_and_dvd_of_dvd_mul (gcd_dvd_right k (m * n))
replace h : gcd k (m * n) = m' * n' := h
rw [h]
have hm'n' : m' * n' ∣ k := h ▸ gcd_dvd_left _ _
apply mul_dvd_mul
· have hm'k : m' ∣ k := (dvd_mul_right m' n').trans hm'n'
exact dvd_gcd hm'k hm'
· have hn'k : n' ∣ k := (dvd_mul_left n' m').trans hm'n'
exact dvd_gcd hn'k hn'
theorem gcd_pow_right_dvd_pow_gcd [GCDMonoid α] {a b : α} {k : ℕ} :
gcd a (b ^ k) ∣ gcd a b ^ k := by
by_cases hg : gcd a b = 0
· rw [gcd_eq_zero_iff] at hg
rcases hg with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact
(gcd_zero_left' (0 ^ k : α)).dvd.trans
(pow_dvd_pow_of_dvd (gcd_zero_left' (0 : α)).symm.dvd _)
· induction k with
| zero => rw [pow_zero, pow_zero]; exact (gcd_one_right' a).dvd
| succ k hk =>
rw [pow_succ', pow_succ']
trans gcd a b * gcd a (b ^ k)
· exact gcd_mul_dvd_mul_gcd a b (b ^ k)
· exact (mul_dvd_mul_iff_left hg).mpr hk
theorem gcd_pow_left_dvd_pow_gcd [GCDMonoid α] {a b : α} {k : ℕ} : gcd (a ^ k) b ∣ gcd a b ^ k :=
calc
gcd (a ^ k) b ∣ gcd b (a ^ k) := (gcd_comm' _ _).dvd
_ ∣ gcd b a ^ k := gcd_pow_right_dvd_pow_gcd
_ ∣ gcd a b ^ k := pow_dvd_pow_of_dvd (gcd_comm' _ _).dvd _
theorem pow_dvd_of_mul_eq_pow [GCDMonoid α] {a b c d₁ d₂ : α} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hab : IsUnit (gcd a b))
{k : ℕ} (h : a * b = c ^ k) (hc : c = d₁ * d₂) (hd₁ : d₁ ∣ a) : d₁ ^ k ≠ 0 ∧ d₁ ^ k ∣ a := by
have h1 : IsUnit (gcd (d₁ ^ k) b) := by
apply isUnit_of_dvd_one
trans gcd d₁ b ^ k
· exact gcd_pow_left_dvd_pow_gcd
· apply IsUnit.dvd
apply IsUnit.pow
apply isUnit_of_dvd_one
apply dvd_trans _ hab.dvd
apply gcd_dvd_gcd hd₁ (dvd_refl b)
have h2 : d₁ ^ k ∣ a * b := by
use d₂ ^ k
rw [h, hc]
exact mul_pow d₁ d₂ k
rw [mul_comm] at h2
have h3 : d₁ ^ k ∣ a := by
apply (dvd_gcd_mul_of_dvd_mul h2).trans
rw [h1.mul_left_dvd]
have h4 : d₁ ^ k ≠ 0 := by
intro hdk
rw [hdk] at h3
apply absurd (zero_dvd_iff.mp h3) ha
exact ⟨h4, h3⟩
theorem exists_associated_pow_of_mul_eq_pow [GCDMonoid α] {a b c : α} (hab : IsUnit (gcd a b))
{k : ℕ} (h : a * b = c ^ k) : ∃ d : α, Associated (d ^ k) a := by
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial α
· use 0
rw [Subsingleton.elim a (0 ^ k)]
by_cases ha : a = 0
· use 0
obtain rfl | hk := eq_or_ne k 0
· simp [ha] at h
· rw [ha, zero_pow hk]
by_cases hb : b = 0
· use 1
rw [one_pow]
apply (associated_one_iff_isUnit.mpr hab).symm.trans
rw [hb]
exact gcd_zero_right' a
obtain rfl | hk := k.eq_zero_or_pos
· use 1
rw [pow_zero] at h ⊢
use Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ h
rw [Units.val_mkOfMulEqOne, one_mul]
have hc : c ∣ a * b := by
rw [h]
exact dvd_pow_self _ hk.ne'
obtain ⟨d₁, d₂, hd₁, hd₂, hc⟩ := exists_dvd_and_dvd_of_dvd_mul hc
use d₁
obtain ⟨h0₁, ⟨a', ha'⟩⟩ := pow_dvd_of_mul_eq_pow ha hab h hc hd₁
rw [mul_comm] at h hc
rw [(gcd_comm' a b).isUnit_iff] at hab
obtain ⟨h0₂, ⟨b', hb'⟩⟩ := pow_dvd_of_mul_eq_pow hb hab h hc hd₂
rw [ha', hb', hc, mul_pow] at h
have h' : a' * b' = 1 := by
apply (mul_right_inj' h0₁).mp
rw [mul_one]
apply (mul_right_inj' h0₂).mp
rw [← h]
rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm a', ← mul_assoc _ b', ← mul_assoc b', mul_comm b']
use Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ h'
rw [Units.val_mkOfMulEqOne, ha']
theorem exists_eq_pow_of_mul_eq_pow [GCDMonoid α] [Subsingleton αˣ]
{a b c : α} (hab : IsUnit (gcd a b)) {k : ℕ} (h : a * b = c ^ k) : ∃ d : α, a = d ^ k :=
let ⟨d, hd⟩ := exists_associated_pow_of_mul_eq_pow hab h
⟨d, (associated_iff_eq.mp hd).symm⟩
theorem gcd_greatest {α : Type*} [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] {a b d : α}
(hda : d ∣ a) (hdb : d ∣ b) (hd : ∀ e : α, e ∣ a → e ∣ b → e ∣ d) :
GCDMonoid.gcd a b = normalize d :=
haveI h := hd _ (GCDMonoid.gcd_dvd_left a b) (GCDMonoid.gcd_dvd_right a b)
gcd_eq_normalize h (GCDMonoid.dvd_gcd hda hdb)
theorem gcd_greatest_associated {α : Type*} [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] [GCDMonoid α] {a b d : α}
(hda : d ∣ a) (hdb : d ∣ b) (hd : ∀ e : α, e ∣ a → e ∣ b → e ∣ d) :
Associated d (GCDMonoid.gcd a b) :=
haveI h := hd _ (GCDMonoid.gcd_dvd_left a b) (GCDMonoid.gcd_dvd_right a b)
associated_of_dvd_dvd (GCDMonoid.dvd_gcd hda hdb) h
theorem isUnit_gcd_of_eq_mul_gcd {α : Type*} [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] [GCDMonoid α]
{x y x' y' : α} (ex : x = gcd x y * x') (ey : y = gcd x y * y') (h : gcd x y ≠ 0) :
IsUnit (gcd x' y') := by
rw [← associated_one_iff_isUnit]
refine Associated.of_mul_left ?_ (Associated.refl <| gcd x y) h
convert (gcd_mul_left' (gcd x y) x' y').symm using 1
rw [← ex, ← ey, mul_one]
theorem extract_gcd {α : Type*} [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] [GCDMonoid α] (x y : α) :
∃ x' y', x = gcd x y * x' ∧ y = gcd x y * y' ∧ IsUnit (gcd x' y') := by
by_cases h : gcd x y = 0
· obtain ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ := (gcd_eq_zero_iff x y).1 h
simp_rw [← associated_one_iff_isUnit]
exact ⟨1, 1, by rw [h, zero_mul], by rw [h, zero_mul], gcd_one_left' 1⟩
obtain ⟨x', ex⟩ := gcd_dvd_left x y
obtain ⟨y', ey⟩ := gcd_dvd_right x y
exact ⟨x', y', ex, ey, isUnit_gcd_of_eq_mul_gcd ex ey h⟩
theorem associated_gcd_left_iff [GCDMonoid α] {x y : α} : Associated x (gcd x y) ↔ x ∣ y :=
⟨fun hx => hx.dvd.trans (gcd_dvd_right x y),
fun hxy => associated_of_dvd_dvd (dvd_gcd dvd_rfl hxy) (gcd_dvd_left x y)⟩
theorem associated_gcd_right_iff [GCDMonoid α] {x y : α} : Associated y (gcd x y) ↔ y ∣ x :=
⟨fun hx => hx.dvd.trans (gcd_dvd_left x y),
fun hxy => associated_of_dvd_dvd (dvd_gcd hxy dvd_rfl) (gcd_dvd_right x y)⟩
theorem Irreducible.isUnit_gcd_iff [GCDMonoid α] {x y : α} (hx : Irreducible x) :
IsUnit (gcd x y) ↔ ¬(x ∣ y) := by
rw [hx.isUnit_iff_not_associated_of_dvd (gcd_dvd_left x y), not_iff_not, associated_gcd_left_iff]
theorem Irreducible.gcd_eq_one_iff [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] {x y : α} (hx : Irreducible x) :
gcd x y = 1 ↔ ¬(x ∣ y) := by
rw [← hx.isUnit_gcd_iff, ← normalize_eq_one, NormalizedGCDMonoid.normalize_gcd]
section Neg
variable [HasDistribNeg α]
lemma gcd_neg' [GCDMonoid α] {a b : α} : Associated (gcd a (-b)) (gcd a b) :=
Associated.gcd .rfl (.neg_left .rfl)
lemma gcd_neg [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] {a b : α} : gcd a (-b) = gcd a b :=
gcd_neg'.eq_of_normalized (normalize_gcd _ _) (normalize_gcd _ _)
lemma neg_gcd' [GCDMonoid α] {a b : α} : Associated (gcd (-a) b) (gcd a b) :=
Associated.gcd (.neg_left .rfl) .rfl
lemma neg_gcd [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] {a b : α} : gcd (-a) b = gcd a b :=
neg_gcd'.eq_of_normalized (normalize_gcd _ _) (normalize_gcd _ _)
end Neg
end GCD
section LCM
theorem lcm_dvd_iff [GCDMonoid α] {a b c : α} : lcm a b ∣ c ↔ a ∣ c ∧ b ∣ c := by
by_cases h : a = 0 ∨ b = 0
· rcases h with (rfl | rfl) <;>
simp +contextual only [iff_def, lcm_zero_left, lcm_zero_right,
zero_dvd_iff, dvd_zero, eq_self_iff_true, and_true, imp_true_iff]
· obtain ⟨h1, h2⟩ := not_or.1 h
have h : gcd a b ≠ 0 := fun H => h1 ((gcd_eq_zero_iff _ _).1 H).1
rw [← mul_dvd_mul_iff_left h, (gcd_mul_lcm a b).dvd_iff_dvd_left, ←
(gcd_mul_right' c a b).dvd_iff_dvd_right, dvd_gcd_iff, mul_comm b c, mul_dvd_mul_iff_left h1,
mul_dvd_mul_iff_right h2, and_comm]
theorem dvd_lcm_left [GCDMonoid α] (a b : α) : a ∣ lcm a b :=
(lcm_dvd_iff.1 (dvd_refl (lcm a b))).1
theorem dvd_lcm_right [GCDMonoid α] (a b : α) : b ∣ lcm a b :=
(lcm_dvd_iff.1 (dvd_refl (lcm a b))).2
theorem lcm_dvd [GCDMonoid α] {a b c : α} (hab : a ∣ b) (hcb : c ∣ b) : lcm a c ∣ b :=
lcm_dvd_iff.2 ⟨hab, hcb⟩
@[simp]
theorem lcm_eq_zero_iff [GCDMonoid α] (a b : α) : lcm a b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
Iff.intro
(fun h : lcm a b = 0 => by
have : Associated (a * b) 0 := (gcd_mul_lcm a b).symm.trans <| by rw [h, mul_zero]
rwa [← mul_eq_zero, ← associated_zero_iff_eq_zero])
(by rintro (rfl | rfl) <;> [apply lcm_zero_left; apply lcm_zero_right])
@[simp]
theorem normalize_lcm [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b : α) : normalize (lcm a b) = lcm a b :=
NormalizedGCDMonoid.normalize_lcm a b
theorem lcm_comm [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b : α) : lcm a b = lcm b a :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_lcm _ _) (normalize_lcm _ _)
(lcm_dvd (dvd_lcm_right _ _) (dvd_lcm_left _ _))
(lcm_dvd (dvd_lcm_right _ _) (dvd_lcm_left _ _))
theorem lcm_comm' [GCDMonoid α] (a b : α) : Associated (lcm a b) (lcm b a) :=
associated_of_dvd_dvd (lcm_dvd (dvd_lcm_right _ _) (dvd_lcm_left _ _))
(lcm_dvd (dvd_lcm_right _ _) (dvd_lcm_left _ _))
theorem lcm_assoc [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : lcm (lcm m n) k = lcm m (lcm n k) :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_lcm _ _) (normalize_lcm _ _)
(lcm_dvd (lcm_dvd (dvd_lcm_left _ _) ((dvd_lcm_left _ _).trans (dvd_lcm_right _ _)))
((dvd_lcm_right _ _).trans (dvd_lcm_right _ _)))
(lcm_dvd ((dvd_lcm_left _ _).trans (dvd_lcm_left _ _))
(lcm_dvd ((dvd_lcm_right _ _).trans (dvd_lcm_left _ _)) (dvd_lcm_right _ _)))
theorem lcm_assoc' [GCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : Associated (lcm (lcm m n) k) (lcm m (lcm n k)) :=
associated_of_dvd_dvd
(lcm_dvd (lcm_dvd (dvd_lcm_left _ _) ((dvd_lcm_left _ _).trans (dvd_lcm_right _ _)))
((dvd_lcm_right _ _).trans (dvd_lcm_right _ _)))
(lcm_dvd ((dvd_lcm_left _ _).trans (dvd_lcm_left _ _))
(lcm_dvd ((dvd_lcm_right _ _).trans (dvd_lcm_left _ _)) (dvd_lcm_right _ _)))
instance [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] : Std.Commutative (α := α) lcm where
comm := lcm_comm
instance [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] : Std.Associative (α := α) lcm where
assoc := lcm_assoc
theorem lcm_eq_normalize [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] {a b c : α} (habc : lcm a b ∣ c)
(hcab : c ∣ lcm a b) : lcm a b = normalize c :=
normalize_lcm a b ▸ normalize_eq_normalize habc hcab
theorem lcm_dvd_lcm [GCDMonoid α] {a b c d : α} (hab : a ∣ b) (hcd : c ∣ d) : lcm a c ∣ lcm b d :=
lcm_dvd (hab.trans (dvd_lcm_left _ _)) (hcd.trans (dvd_lcm_right _ _))
protected theorem Associated.lcm [GCDMonoid α]
{a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : α} (ha : Associated a₁ a₂) (hb : Associated b₁ b₂) :
Associated (lcm a₁ b₁) (lcm a₂ b₂) :=
associated_of_dvd_dvd (lcm_dvd_lcm ha.dvd hb.dvd) (lcm_dvd_lcm ha.dvd' hb.dvd')
@[simp]
theorem lcm_units_coe_left [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (u : αˣ) (a : α) : lcm (↑u) a = normalize a :=
lcm_eq_normalize (lcm_dvd Units.coe_dvd dvd_rfl) (dvd_lcm_right _ _)
@[simp]
theorem lcm_units_coe_right [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a : α) (u : αˣ) : lcm a ↑u = normalize a :=
(lcm_comm a u).trans <| lcm_units_coe_left _ _
@[simp]
theorem lcm_one_left [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a : α) : lcm 1 a = normalize a :=
lcm_units_coe_left 1 a
@[simp]
theorem lcm_one_right [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a : α) : lcm a 1 = normalize a :=
lcm_units_coe_right a 1
@[simp]
theorem lcm_same [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a : α) : lcm a a = normalize a :=
lcm_eq_normalize (lcm_dvd dvd_rfl dvd_rfl) (dvd_lcm_left _ _)
@[simp]
theorem lcm_eq_one_iff [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b : α) : lcm a b = 1 ↔ a ∣ 1 ∧ b ∣ 1 :=
Iff.intro (fun eq => eq ▸ ⟨dvd_lcm_left _ _, dvd_lcm_right _ _⟩) fun ⟨⟨c, hc⟩, ⟨d, hd⟩⟩ =>
show lcm (Units.mkOfMulEqOne a c hc.symm : α) (Units.mkOfMulEqOne b d hd.symm) = 1 by
rw [lcm_units_coe_left, normalize_coe_units]
@[simp]
theorem lcm_mul_left [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b c : α) :
lcm (a * b) (a * c) = normalize a * lcm b c :=
(by_cases (by rintro rfl; simp only [zero_mul, lcm_zero_left, normalize_zero]))
fun ha : a ≠ 0 =>
suffices lcm (a * b) (a * c) = normalize (a * lcm b c) by simpa
have : a ∣ lcm (a * b) (a * c) := (dvd_mul_right _ _).trans (dvd_lcm_left _ _)
let ⟨_, eq⟩ := this
lcm_eq_normalize
(lcm_dvd (mul_dvd_mul_left a (dvd_lcm_left _ _)) (mul_dvd_mul_left a (dvd_lcm_right _ _)))
(eq.symm ▸
(mul_dvd_mul_left a <|
lcm_dvd ((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left ha).1 <| eq ▸ dvd_lcm_left _ _)
((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left ha).1 <| eq ▸ dvd_lcm_right _ _)))
@[simp]
theorem lcm_mul_right [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b c : α) :
lcm (b * a) (c * a) = lcm b c * normalize a := by simp only [mul_comm, lcm_mul_left]
theorem lcm_eq_left_iff [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b : α) (h : normalize a = a) :
lcm a b = a ↔ b ∣ a :=
(Iff.intro fun eq => eq ▸ dvd_lcm_right _ _) fun hab =>
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_lcm _ _) h (lcm_dvd (dvd_refl a) hab) (dvd_lcm_left _ _)
theorem lcm_eq_right_iff [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] (a b : α) (h : normalize b = b) :
lcm a b = b ↔ a ∣ b := by simpa only [lcm_comm b a] using lcm_eq_left_iff b a h
theorem lcm_dvd_lcm_mul_left [GCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : lcm m n ∣ lcm (k * m) n :=
lcm_dvd_lcm (dvd_mul_left _ _) dvd_rfl
theorem lcm_dvd_lcm_mul_right [GCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : lcm m n ∣ lcm (m * k) n :=
lcm_dvd_lcm (dvd_mul_right _ _) dvd_rfl
theorem lcm_dvd_lcm_mul_left_right [GCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : lcm m n ∣ lcm m (k * n) :=
lcm_dvd_lcm dvd_rfl (dvd_mul_left _ _)
theorem lcm_dvd_lcm_mul_right_right [GCDMonoid α] (m n k : α) : lcm m n ∣ lcm m (n * k) :=
lcm_dvd_lcm dvd_rfl (dvd_mul_right _ _)
theorem lcm_eq_of_associated_left [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] {m n : α} (h : Associated m n) (k : α) :
lcm m k = lcm n k :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_lcm _ _) (normalize_lcm _ _) (lcm_dvd_lcm h.dvd dvd_rfl)
(lcm_dvd_lcm h.symm.dvd dvd_rfl)
theorem lcm_eq_of_associated_right [NormalizedGCDMonoid α] {m n : α} (h : Associated m n) (k : α) :
lcm k m = lcm k n :=
dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_lcm _ _) (normalize_lcm _ _) (lcm_dvd_lcm dvd_rfl h.dvd)
(lcm_dvd_lcm dvd_rfl h.symm.dvd)
end LCM
end GCDMonoid
section UniqueUnit
variable [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] [Subsingleton αˣ]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) NormalizationMonoid.ofUniqueUnits : NormalizationMonoid α where
normUnit _ := 1
normUnit_zero := rfl
normUnit_mul _ _ := (mul_one 1).symm
normUnit_coe_units _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
instance uniqueNormalizationMonoidOfUniqueUnits : Unique (NormalizationMonoid α) where
default := .ofUniqueUnits
uniq := fun ⟨u, _, _, _⟩ => by congr; simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
instance subsingleton_gcdMonoid_of_unique_units : Subsingleton (GCDMonoid α) :=
⟨fun g₁ g₂ => by
have hgcd : g₁.gcd = g₂.gcd := by
ext a b
refine associated_iff_eq.mp (associated_of_dvd_dvd ?_ ?_) <;>
apply_rules +allowSynthFailures [dvd_gcd, gcd_dvd_left, gcd_dvd_right]
have hlcm : g₁.lcm = g₂.lcm := by
ext a b
refine associated_iff_eq.mp (associated_of_dvd_dvd ?_ ?_) <;>
apply_rules +allowSynthFailures [lcm_dvd, dvd_lcm_left, dvd_lcm_right]
cases g₁
cases g₂
dsimp only at hgcd hlcm
simp only [hgcd, hlcm]⟩
instance subsingleton_normalizedGCDMonoid_of_unique_units : Subsingleton (NormalizedGCDMonoid α) :=
⟨by
intro a b
cases a; rename_i a_norm a_gcd _ _
cases b; rename_i b_norm b_gcd _ _
have := Subsingleton.elim a_gcd b_gcd
subst this
have := Subsingleton.elim a_norm b_norm
subst this
rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem normUnit_eq_one (x : α) : normUnit x = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem normalize_eq (x : α) : normalize x = x :=
mul_one x
/-- If a monoid's only unit is `1`, then it is isomorphic to its associates. -/
@[simps]
def associatesEquivOfUniqueUnits : Associates α ≃* α where
toFun := Associates.out
invFun := Associates.mk
left_inv := Associates.mk_out
right_inv _ := (Associates.out_mk _).trans <| normalize_eq _
map_mul' := Associates.out_mul
end UniqueUnit
section IsDomain
variable [CommRing α] [IsDomain α] [NormalizedGCDMonoid α]
theorem gcd_eq_of_dvd_sub_right {a b c : α} (h : a ∣ b - c) : gcd a b = gcd a c := by
apply dvd_antisymm_of_normalize_eq (normalize_gcd _ _) (normalize_gcd _ _) <;>
rw [dvd_gcd_iff] <;>
refine ⟨gcd_dvd_left _ _, ?_⟩
· rcases h with ⟨d, hd⟩
rcases gcd_dvd_right a b with ⟨e, he⟩
rcases gcd_dvd_left a b with ⟨f, hf⟩
use e - f * d
rw [mul_sub, ← he, ← mul_assoc, ← hf, ← hd, sub_sub_cancel]
· rcases h with ⟨d, hd⟩
rcases gcd_dvd_right a c with ⟨e, he⟩
rcases gcd_dvd_left a c with ⟨f, hf⟩
use e + f * d
rw [mul_add, ← he, ← mul_assoc, ← hf, ← hd, ← add_sub_assoc, add_comm c b, add_sub_cancel_right]
theorem gcd_eq_of_dvd_sub_left {a b c : α} (h : a ∣ b - c) : gcd b a = gcd c a := by
rw [gcd_comm _ a, gcd_comm _ a, gcd_eq_of_dvd_sub_right h]
end IsDomain
noncomputable section Constructors
open Associates
variable [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α]
private theorem map_mk_unit_aux [DecidableEq α] {f : Associates α →* α}
(hinv : Function.RightInverse f Associates.mk) (a : α) :
a * ↑(Classical.choose (associated_map_mk hinv a)) = f (Associates.mk a) :=
Classical.choose_spec (associated_map_mk hinv a)
/-- Define `NormalizationMonoid` on a structure from a `MonoidHom` inverse to `Associates.mk`. -/
def normalizationMonoidOfMonoidHomRightInverse [DecidableEq α] (f : Associates α →* α)
(hinv : Function.RightInverse f Associates.mk) :
NormalizationMonoid α where
normUnit a :=
if a = 0 then 1
else Classical.choose (Associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated.1 (hinv (Associates.mk a)).symm)
normUnit_zero := if_pos rfl
normUnit_mul {a b} ha hb := by
simp_rw [if_neg (mul_ne_zero ha hb), if_neg ha, if_neg hb, Units.ext_iff, Units.val_mul]
suffices a * b * ↑(Classical.choose (associated_map_mk hinv (a * b))) =
a * ↑(Classical.choose (associated_map_mk hinv a)) *
(b * ↑(Classical.choose (associated_map_mk hinv b))) by
apply mul_left_cancel₀ (mul_ne_zero ha hb) _
simpa only [mul_assoc, mul_comm, mul_left_comm] using this
rw [map_mk_unit_aux hinv a, map_mk_unit_aux hinv (a * b), map_mk_unit_aux hinv b, ←
MonoidHom.map_mul, Associates.mk_mul_mk]
normUnit_coe_units u := by
nontriviality α
simp_rw [if_neg (Units.ne_zero u), Units.ext_iff]
apply mul_left_cancel₀ (Units.ne_zero u)
rw [Units.mul_inv, map_mk_unit_aux hinv u,
Associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated.2 (associated_one_iff_isUnit.2 ⟨u, rfl⟩),
Associates.mk_one, MonoidHom.map_one]
/-- Define `GCDMonoid` on a structure just from the `gcd` and its properties. -/
noncomputable def gcdMonoidOfGCD [DecidableEq α] (gcd : α → α → α)
(gcd_dvd_left : ∀ a b, gcd a b ∣ a) (gcd_dvd_right : ∀ a b, gcd a b ∣ b)
(dvd_gcd : ∀ {a b c}, a ∣ c → a ∣ b → a ∣ gcd c b) : GCDMonoid α :=
{ gcd
gcd_dvd_left
gcd_dvd_right
dvd_gcd := fun {_ _ _} => dvd_gcd
lcm := fun a b =>
if a = 0 then 0 else Classical.choose ((gcd_dvd_left a b).trans (Dvd.intro b rfl))
gcd_mul_lcm := fun a b => by
split_ifs with a0
· rw [mul_zero, a0, zero_mul]
· rw [← Classical.choose_spec ((gcd_dvd_left a b).trans (Dvd.intro b rfl))]
lcm_zero_left := fun _ => if_pos rfl
lcm_zero_right := fun a => by
split_ifs with a0
· rfl
have h := (Classical.choose_spec ((gcd_dvd_left a 0).trans (Dvd.intro 0 rfl))).symm
have a0' : gcd a 0 ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! a0
rw [← associated_zero_iff_eq_zero, ← a0]
exact associated_of_dvd_dvd (dvd_gcd (dvd_refl a) (dvd_zero a)) (gcd_dvd_left _ _)
apply Or.resolve_left (mul_eq_zero.1 _) a0'
rw [h, mul_zero] }
/-- Define `NormalizedGCDMonoid` on a structure just from the `gcd` and its properties. -/
noncomputable def normalizedGCDMonoidOfGCD [NormalizationMonoid α] [DecidableEq α] (gcd : α → α → α)
(gcd_dvd_left : ∀ a b, gcd a b ∣ a) (gcd_dvd_right : ∀ a b, gcd a b ∣ b)
(dvd_gcd : ∀ {a b c}, a ∣ c → a ∣ b → a ∣ gcd c b)
(normalize_gcd : ∀ a b, normalize (gcd a b) = gcd a b) : NormalizedGCDMonoid α :=
{ (inferInstance : NormalizationMonoid α) with
gcd
gcd_dvd_left
gcd_dvd_right
dvd_gcd := fun {_ _ _} => dvd_gcd
normalize_gcd
lcm := fun a b =>
if a = 0 then 0
else Classical.choose (dvd_normalize_iff.2 ((gcd_dvd_left a b).trans (Dvd.intro b rfl)))
normalize_lcm := fun a b => by
dsimp [normalize]
split_ifs with a0
· exact @normalize_zero α _ _
· have := (Classical.choose_spec
(dvd_normalize_iff.2 ((gcd_dvd_left a b).trans (Dvd.intro b rfl)))).symm
set l := Classical.choose (dvd_normalize_iff.2 ((gcd_dvd_left a b).trans (Dvd.intro b rfl)))
obtain rfl | hb := eq_or_ne b 0
· rw [mul_zero a, normalize_zero, mul_eq_zero] at this
obtain ha | hl := this
· apply (a0 _).elim
rw [← zero_dvd_iff, ← ha]
exact gcd_dvd_left _ _
· rw [hl, zero_mul]
have h1 : gcd a b ≠ 0 := by
have hab : a * b ≠ 0 := mul_ne_zero a0 hb
contrapose! hab
rw [← normalize_eq_zero, ← this, hab, zero_mul]
have h2 : normalize (gcd a b * l) = gcd a b * l := by rw [this, normalize_idem]
rw [← normalize_gcd] at this
rwa [normalize.map_mul, normalize_gcd, mul_right_inj' h1] at h2
gcd_mul_lcm := fun a b => by
split_ifs with a0
· rw [mul_zero, a0, zero_mul]
· rw [← Classical.choose_spec (dvd_normalize_iff.2 ((gcd_dvd_left a b).trans (.intro b rfl)))]
exact normalize_associated (a * b)
lcm_zero_left := fun _ => if_pos rfl
lcm_zero_right := fun a => by
split_ifs with a0
· rfl
rw [← normalize_eq_zero] at a0
have h :=
(Classical.choose_spec (dvd_normalize_iff.2 ((gcd_dvd_left a 0).trans (.intro 0 rfl)))).symm
have gcd0 : gcd a 0 = normalize a := by
rw [← normalize_gcd]
exact normalize_eq_normalize (gcd_dvd_left _ _) (dvd_gcd (dvd_refl a) (dvd_zero a))
rw [← gcd0] at a0
apply Or.resolve_left (mul_eq_zero.1 _) a0
rw [h, mul_zero, normalize_zero] }
/-- Define `GCDMonoid` on a structure just from the `lcm` and its properties. -/
noncomputable def gcdMonoidOfLCM [DecidableEq α] (lcm : α → α → α)
(dvd_lcm_left : ∀ a b, a ∣ lcm a b) (dvd_lcm_right : ∀ a b, b ∣ lcm a b)
(lcm_dvd : ∀ {a b c}, c ∣ a → b ∣ a → lcm c b ∣ a) : GCDMonoid α :=
let exists_gcd a b := lcm_dvd (Dvd.intro b rfl) (Dvd.intro_left a rfl)
{ lcm
gcd := fun a b => if a = 0 then b else if b = 0 then a else Classical.choose (exists_gcd a b)
gcd_mul_lcm := fun a b => by
split_ifs with h h_1
· rw [h, eq_zero_of_zero_dvd (dvd_lcm_left _ _), mul_zero, zero_mul]
· rw [h_1, eq_zero_of_zero_dvd (dvd_lcm_right _ _)]
rw [mul_comm, ← Classical.choose_spec (exists_gcd a b)]
lcm_zero_left := fun _ => eq_zero_of_zero_dvd (dvd_lcm_left _ _)
| lcm_zero_right := fun _ => eq_zero_of_zero_dvd (dvd_lcm_right _ _)
gcd_dvd_left := fun a b => by
| Mathlib/Algebra/GCDMonoid/Basic.lean | 1,024 | 1,025 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Indicator
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.AffineSubspace.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp.LinearCombination
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
/-!
# Affine combinations of points
This file defines affine combinations of points.
## Main definitions
* `weightedVSubOfPoint` is a general weighted combination of
subtractions with an explicit base point, yielding a vector.
* `weightedVSub` uses an arbitrary choice of base point and is intended
to be used when the sum of weights is 0, in which case the result is
independent of the choice of base point.
* `affineCombination` adds the weighted combination to the arbitrary
base point, yielding a point rather than a vector, and is intended
to be used when the sum of weights is 1, in which case the result is
independent of the choice of base point.
These definitions are for sums over a `Finset`; versions for a
`Fintype` may be obtained using `Finset.univ`, while versions for a
`Finsupp` may be obtained using `Finsupp.support`.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affine_space
-/
noncomputable section
open Affine
namespace Finset
theorem univ_fin2 : (univ : Finset (Fin 2)) = {0, 1} := by
ext x
fin_cases x <;> simp
variable {k : Type*} {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
variable [S : AffineSpace V P]
variable {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι)
variable {ι₂ : Type*} (s₂ : Finset ι₂)
/-- A weighted sum of the results of subtracting a base point from the
given points, as a linear map on the weights. The main cases of
interest are where the sum of the weights is 0, in which case the sum
is independent of the choice of base point, and where the sum of the
weights is 1, in which case the sum added to the base point is
independent of the choice of base point. -/
def weightedVSubOfPoint (p : ι → P) (b : P) : (ι → k) →ₗ[k] V :=
∑ i ∈ s, (LinearMap.proj i : (ι → k) →ₗ[k] k).smulRight (p i -ᵥ b)
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_apply (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w = ∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p i -ᵥ b) := by
simp [weightedVSubOfPoint, LinearMap.sum_apply]
/-- The value of `weightedVSubOfPoint`, where the given points are equal. -/
@[simp (high)]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const (w : ι → k) (p : P) (b : P) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint (fun _ => p) b w = (∑ i ∈ s, w i) • (p -ᵥ b) := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, sum_smul]
lemma weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd (s : Finset ι) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) (v : V) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint (v +ᵥ p) b w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (-v +ᵥ b) w := by
simp [vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, add_comm]
lemma weightedVSubOfPoint_smul {G : Type*} [Group G] [DistribMulAction G V] [SMulCommClass G k V]
(s : Finset ι) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → V) (b : V) (a : G) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint (a • p) b w = a • s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (a⁻¹ • b) w := by
simp [smul_sum, smul_sub, smul_comm a (w _)]
/-- `weightedVSubOfPoint` gives equal results for two families of weights and two families of
points that are equal on `s`. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_congr {w₁ w₂ : ι → k} (hw : ∀ i ∈ s, w₁ i = w₂ i) {p₁ p₂ : ι → P}
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, p₁ i = p₂ i) (b : P) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₁ b w₁ = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₂ b w₂ := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
refine sum_congr rfl fun i hi => ?_
rw [hw i hi, hp i hi]
/-- Given a family of points, if we use a member of the family as a base point, the
`weightedVSubOfPoint` does not depend on the value of the weights at this point. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_eq_of_weights_eq (p : ι → P) (j : ι) (w₁ w₂ : ι → k)
(hw : ∀ i, i ≠ j → w₁ i = w₂ i) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p j) w₁ = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p j) w₂ := by
simp only [Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
congr
ext i
rcases eq_or_ne i j with h | h
· simp [h]
· simp [hw i h]
/-- The weighted sum is independent of the base point when the sum of
the weights is 0. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_eq_of_sum_eq_zero (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0)
(b₁ b₂ : P) : s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b₁ w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b₂ w := by
apply eq_of_sub_eq_zero
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← sum_sub_distrib]
conv_lhs =>
congr
· skip
· ext
rw [← smul_sub, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left]
rw [← sum_smul, h, zero_smul]
/-- The weighted sum, added to the base point, is independent of the
base point when the sum of the weights is 1. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_eq_of_sum_eq_one (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1)
(b₁ b₂ : P) : s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b₁ w +ᵥ b₁ = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b₂ w +ᵥ b₂ := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V,
vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, ← add_sub_assoc, add_comm, add_sub_assoc, ←
sum_sub_distrib]
conv_lhs =>
congr
· skip
· congr
· skip
· ext
rw [← smul_sub, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left]
rw [← sum_smul, h, one_smul, vsub_add_vsub_cancel, vsub_self]
/-- The weighted sum is unaffected by removing the base point, if
present, from the set of points. -/
@[simp (high)]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_erase [DecidableEq ι] (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (i : ι) :
(s.erase i).weightedVSubOfPoint p (p i) w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p i) w := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
apply sum_erase
rw [vsub_self, smul_zero]
/-- The weighted sum is unaffected by adding the base point, whether
or not present, to the set of points. -/
@[simp (high)]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_insert [DecidableEq ι] (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (i : ι) :
(insert i s).weightedVSubOfPoint p (p i) w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p i) w := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
apply sum_insert_zero
rw [vsub_self, smul_zero]
/-- The weighted sum is unaffected by changing the weights to the
corresponding indicator function and adding points to the set. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_indicator_subset (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) {s₁ s₂ : Finset ι}
(h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
s₁.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w = s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint p b (Set.indicator (↑s₁) w) := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
exact Eq.symm <|
sum_indicator_subset_of_eq_zero w (fun i wi => wi • (p i -ᵥ b : V)) h fun i => zero_smul k _
/-- A weighted sum, over the image of an embedding, equals a weighted
sum with the same points and weights over the original
`Finset`. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_map (e : ι₂ ↪ ι) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) :
(s₂.map e).weightedVSubOfPoint p b w = s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint (p ∘ e) b (w ∘ e) := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
exact Finset.sum_map _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, expressed as a subtraction of two
`weightedVSubOfPoint` expressions. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub (w : ι → k) (p₁ p₂ : ι → P) (b : P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂ i)) =
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₁ b w - s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₂ b w := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← sum_sub_distrib, ← smul_sub, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right]
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the right is constant,
expressed as a subtraction involving a `weightedVSubOfPoint` expression. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_const_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub (w : ι → k) (p₁ : ι → P) (p₂ b : P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂)) = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₁ b w - (∑ i ∈ s, w i) • (p₂ -ᵥ b) := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const]
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the left is constant,
expressed as a subtraction involving a `weightedVSubOfPoint` expression. -/
theorem sum_smul_const_vsub_eq_sub_weightedVSubOfPoint (w : ι → k) (p₂ : ι → P) (p₁ b : P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂ i)) = (∑ i ∈ s, w i) • (p₁ -ᵥ b) - s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₂ b w := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const]
/-- A weighted sum may be split into such sums over two subsets. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k)
(p : ι → P) (b : P) :
(s \ s₂).weightedVSubOfPoint p b w + s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w =
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, sum_sdiff h]
/-- A weighted sum may be split into a subtraction of such sums over two subsets. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff_sub [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k)
(p : ι → P) (b : P) :
(s \ s₂).weightedVSubOfPoint p b w - s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint p b (-w) =
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
rw [map_neg, sub_neg_eq_add, s.weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff h]
/-- A weighted sum over `s.subtype pred` equals one over `{x ∈ s | pred x}`. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype_eq_filter (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) (pred : ι → Prop)
[DecidablePred pred] :
((s.subtype pred).weightedVSubOfPoint (fun i => p i) b fun i => w i) =
{x ∈ s | pred x}.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← sum_subtype_eq_sum_filter]
/-- A weighted sum over `{x ∈ s | pred x}` equals one over `s` if all the weights at indices in `s`
not satisfying `pred` are zero. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_filter_of_ne (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) {pred : ι → Prop}
[DecidablePred pred] (h : ∀ i ∈ s, w i ≠ 0 → pred i) :
{x ∈ s | pred x}.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, sum_filter_of_ne]
intro i hi hne
refine h i hi ?_
intro hw
simp [hw] at hne
/-- A constant multiplier of the weights in `weightedVSubOfPoint` may be moved outside the
sum. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_const_smul (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) (c : k) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b (c • w) = c • s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, smul_sum, Pi.smul_apply, smul_smul, smul_eq_mul]
/-- A weighted sum of the results of subtracting a default base point
from the given points, as a linear map on the weights. This is
intended to be used when the sum of the weights is 0; that condition
is specified as a hypothesis on those lemmas that require it. -/
def weightedVSub (p : ι → P) : (ι → k) →ₗ[k] V :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (Classical.choice S.nonempty)
/-- Applying `weightedVSub` with given weights. This is for the case
where a result involving a default base point is OK (for example, when
that base point will cancel out later); a more typical use case for
`weightedVSub` would involve selecting a preferred base point with
`weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero` and then
using `weightedVSubOfPoint_apply`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_apply (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
s.weightedVSub p w = ∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p i -ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty) := by
simp [weightedVSub, LinearMap.sum_apply]
/-- `weightedVSub` gives the sum of the results of subtracting any
base point, when the sum of the weights is 0. -/
theorem weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) (b : P) : s.weightedVSub p w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_eq_of_sum_eq_zero w p h _ _
/-- The value of `weightedVSub`, where the given points are equal and the sum of the weights
is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSub_apply_const (w : ι → k) (p : P) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) :
s.weightedVSub (fun _ => p) w = 0 := by
rw [weightedVSub, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const, h, zero_smul]
/-- The `weightedVSub` for an empty set is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSub_empty (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) : (∅ : Finset ι).weightedVSub p w = (0 : V) := by
simp [weightedVSub_apply]
lemma weightedVSub_vadd {s : Finset ι} {w : ι → k} (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) (p : ι → P) (v : V) :
s.weightedVSub (v +ᵥ p) w = s.weightedVSub p w := by
rw [weightedVSub, weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd,
weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero _ _ _ h]
lemma weightedVSub_smul {G : Type*} [Group G] [DistribMulAction G V] [SMulCommClass G k V]
{s : Finset ι} {w : ι → k} (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) (p : ι → V) (a : G) :
s.weightedVSub (a • p) w = a • s.weightedVSub p w := by
rw [weightedVSub, weightedVSubOfPoint_smul,
weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero _ _ _ h]
/-- `weightedVSub` gives equal results for two families of weights and two families of points
that are equal on `s`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_congr {w₁ w₂ : ι → k} (hw : ∀ i ∈ s, w₁ i = w₂ i) {p₁ p₂ : ι → P}
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, p₁ i = p₂ i) : s.weightedVSub p₁ w₁ = s.weightedVSub p₂ w₂ :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_congr hw hp _
/-- The weighted sum is unaffected by changing the weights to the
corresponding indicator function and adding points to the set. -/
theorem weightedVSub_indicator_subset (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {s₁ s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
s₁.weightedVSub p w = s₂.weightedVSub p (Set.indicator (↑s₁) w) :=
weightedVSubOfPoint_indicator_subset _ _ _ h
/-- A weighted subtraction, over the image of an embedding, equals a
weighted subtraction with the same points and weights over the
original `Finset`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_map (e : ι₂ ↪ ι) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
(s₂.map e).weightedVSub p w = s₂.weightedVSub (p ∘ e) (w ∘ e) :=
s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint_map _ _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, expressed as a subtraction of two `weightedVSub`
expressions. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSub_sub (w : ι → k) (p₁ p₂ : ι → P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂ i)) = s.weightedVSub p₁ w - s.weightedVSub p₂ w :=
s.sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub _ _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the right is constant and the
sum of the weights is 0. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_const_eq_weightedVSub (w : ι → k) (p₁ : ι → P) (p₂ : P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) : (∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂)) = s.weightedVSub p₁ w := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSub_sub, s.weightedVSub_apply_const _ _ h, sub_zero]
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the left is constant and the
sum of the weights is 0. -/
theorem sum_smul_const_vsub_eq_neg_weightedVSub (w : ι → k) (p₂ : ι → P) (p₁ : P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) : (∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂ i)) = -s.weightedVSub p₂ w := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSub_sub, s.weightedVSub_apply_const _ _ h, zero_sub]
/-- A weighted sum may be split into such sums over two subsets. -/
theorem weightedVSub_sdiff [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
(s \ s₂).weightedVSub p w + s₂.weightedVSub p w = s.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff h _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum may be split into a subtraction of such sums over two subsets. -/
theorem weightedVSub_sdiff_sub [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k)
(p : ι → P) : (s \ s₂).weightedVSub p w - s₂.weightedVSub p (-w) = s.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff_sub h _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum over `s.subtype pred` equals one over `{x ∈ s | pred x}`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_subtype_eq_filter (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (pred : ι → Prop)
[DecidablePred pred] :
((s.subtype pred).weightedVSub (fun i => p i) fun i => w i) =
{x ∈ s | pred x}.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype_eq_filter _ _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum over `{x ∈ s | pred x}` equals one over `s` if all the weights at indices in `s`
not satisfying `pred` are zero. -/
theorem weightedVSub_filter_of_ne (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {pred : ι → Prop} [DecidablePred pred]
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, w i ≠ 0 → pred i) : {x ∈ s | pred x}.weightedVSub p w = s.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_filter_of_ne _ _ _ h
/-- A constant multiplier of the weights in `weightedVSub_of` may be moved outside the sum. -/
theorem weightedVSub_const_smul (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (c : k) :
s.weightedVSub p (c • w) = c • s.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_const_smul _ _ _ _
instance : AffineSpace (ι → k) (ι → k) := Pi.instAddTorsor
variable (k)
/-- A weighted sum of the results of subtracting a default base point
from the given points, added to that base point, as an affine map on
the weights. This is intended to be used when the sum of the weights
is 1, in which case it is an affine combination (barycenter) of the
points with the given weights; that condition is specified as a
hypothesis on those lemmas that require it. -/
def affineCombination (p : ι → P) : (ι → k) →ᵃ[k] P where
toFun w := s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (Classical.choice S.nonempty) w +ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty
linear := s.weightedVSub p
map_vadd' w₁ w₂ := by simp_rw [vadd_vadd, weightedVSub, vadd_eq_add, LinearMap.map_add]
/-- The linear map corresponding to `affineCombination` is
`weightedVSub`. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_linear (p : ι → P) :
(s.affineCombination k p).linear = s.weightedVSub p :=
rfl
variable {k}
/-- Applying `affineCombination` with given weights. This is for the
case where a result involving a default base point is OK (for example,
when that base point will cancel out later); a more typical use case
for `affineCombination` would involve selecting a preferred base
point with
`affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one` and
then using `weightedVSubOfPoint_apply`. -/
theorem affineCombination_apply (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
(s.affineCombination k p) w =
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (Classical.choice S.nonempty) w +ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty :=
rfl
/-- The value of `affineCombination`, where the given points are equal. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_apply_const (w : ι → k) (p : P) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) :
s.affineCombination k (fun _ => p) w = p := by
rw [affineCombination_apply, s.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const, h, one_smul, vsub_vadd]
/-- `affineCombination` gives equal results for two families of weights and two families of
points that are equal on `s`. -/
theorem affineCombination_congr {w₁ w₂ : ι → k} (hw : ∀ i ∈ s, w₁ i = w₂ i) {p₁ p₂ : ι → P}
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, p₁ i = p₂ i) : s.affineCombination k p₁ w₁ = s.affineCombination k p₂ w₂ := by
simp_rw [affineCombination_apply, s.weightedVSubOfPoint_congr hw hp]
/-- `affineCombination` gives the sum with any base point, when the
sum of the weights is 1. -/
theorem affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) (b : P) :
s.affineCombination k p w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w +ᵥ b :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_eq_of_sum_eq_one w p h _ _
/-- Adding a `weightedVSub` to an `affineCombination`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_vadd_affineCombination (w₁ w₂ : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
s.weightedVSub p w₁ +ᵥ s.affineCombination k p w₂ = s.affineCombination k p (w₁ + w₂) := by
rw [← vadd_eq_add, AffineMap.map_vadd, affineCombination_linear]
/-- Subtracting two `affineCombination`s. -/
theorem affineCombination_vsub (w₁ w₂ : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
s.affineCombination k p w₁ -ᵥ s.affineCombination k p w₂ = s.weightedVSub p (w₁ - w₂) := by
rw [← AffineMap.linearMap_vsub, affineCombination_linear, vsub_eq_sub]
theorem attach_affineCombination_of_injective [DecidableEq P] (s : Finset P) (w : P → k) (f : s → P)
(hf : Function.Injective f) :
s.attach.affineCombination k f (w ∘ f) = (image f univ).affineCombination k id w := by
simp only [affineCombination, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, id, vadd_right_cancel_iff,
Function.comp_apply, AffineMap.coe_mk]
let g₁ : s → V := fun i => w (f i) • (f i -ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty)
let g₂ : P → V := fun i => w i • (i -ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty)
change univ.sum g₁ = (image f univ).sum g₂
have hgf : g₁ = g₂ ∘ f := by
ext
simp [g₁, g₂]
rw [hgf, sum_image]
· simp only [g₁, g₂,Function.comp_apply]
· exact fun _ _ _ _ hxy => hf hxy
theorem attach_affineCombination_coe (s : Finset P) (w : P → k) :
s.attach.affineCombination k ((↑) : s → P) (w ∘ (↑)) = s.affineCombination k id w := by
classical rw [attach_affineCombination_of_injective s w ((↑) : s → P) Subtype.coe_injective,
univ_eq_attach, attach_image_val]
/-- Viewing a module as an affine space modelled on itself, a `weightedVSub` is just a linear
combination. -/
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSub_eq_linear_combination {ι} (s : Finset ι) {w : ι → k} {p : ι → V}
(hw : s.sum w = 0) : s.weightedVSub p w = ∑ i ∈ s, w i • p i := by
simp [s.weightedVSub_apply, vsub_eq_sub, smul_sub, ← Finset.sum_smul, hw]
/-- Viewing a module as an affine space modelled on itself, affine combinations are just linear
combinations. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_eq_linear_combination (s : Finset ι) (p : ι → V) (w : ι → k)
(hw : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) : s.affineCombination k p w = ∑ i ∈ s, w i • p i := by
simp [s.affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one w p hw 0]
/-- An `affineCombination` equals a point if that point is in the set
and has weight 1 and the other points in the set have weight 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {i : ι} (his : i ∈ s)
(hwi : w i = 1) (hw0 : ∀ i2 ∈ s, i2 ≠ i → w i2 = 0) : s.affineCombination k p w = p i := by
have h1 : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1 := hwi ▸ sum_eq_single i hw0 fun h => False.elim (h his)
rw [s.affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one w p h1 (p i),
weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
convert zero_vadd V (p i)
refine sum_eq_zero ?_
intro i2 hi2
by_cases h : i2 = i
· simp [h]
· simp [hw0 i2 hi2 h]
/-- An affine combination is unaffected by changing the weights to the
corresponding indicator function and adding points to the set. -/
theorem affineCombination_indicator_subset (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {s₁ s₂ : Finset ι}
(h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
s₁.affineCombination k p w = s₂.affineCombination k p (Set.indicator (↑s₁) w) := by
rw [affineCombination_apply, affineCombination_apply,
weightedVSubOfPoint_indicator_subset _ _ _ h]
/-- An affine combination, over the image of an embedding, equals an
affine combination with the same points and weights over the original
`Finset`. -/
theorem affineCombination_map (e : ι₂ ↪ ι) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
(s₂.map e).affineCombination k p w = s₂.affineCombination k (p ∘ e) (w ∘ e) := by
simp_rw [affineCombination_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_map]
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, expressed as a subtraction of two `affineCombination`
expressions. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_eq_affineCombination_vsub (w : ι → k) (p₁ p₂ : ι → P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂ i)) =
s.affineCombination k p₁ w -ᵥ s.affineCombination k p₂ w := by
simp_rw [affineCombination_apply, vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_right]
exact s.sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub _ _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the right is constant and the
sum of the weights is 1. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_const_eq_affineCombination_vsub (w : ι → k) (p₁ : ι → P) (p₂ : P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) : (∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂)) = s.affineCombination k p₁ w -ᵥ p₂ := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_affineCombination_vsub, affineCombination_apply_const _ _ _ h]
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the left is constant and the
sum of the weights is 1. -/
theorem sum_smul_const_vsub_eq_vsub_affineCombination (w : ι → k) (p₂ : ι → P) (p₁ : P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) : (∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂ i)) = p₁ -ᵥ s.affineCombination k p₂ w := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_affineCombination_vsub, affineCombination_apply_const _ _ _ h]
/-- A weighted sum may be split into a subtraction of affine combinations over two subsets. -/
theorem affineCombination_sdiff_sub [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k)
(p : ι → P) :
(s \ s₂).affineCombination k p w -ᵥ s₂.affineCombination k p (-w) = s.weightedVSub p w := by
simp_rw [affineCombination_apply, vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_right]
exact s.weightedVSub_sdiff_sub h _ _
/-- If a weighted sum is zero and one of the weights is `-1`, the corresponding point is
the affine combination of the other points with the given weights. -/
theorem affineCombination_eq_of_weightedVSub_eq_zero_of_eq_neg_one {w : ι → k} {p : ι → P}
(hw : s.weightedVSub p w = (0 : V)) {i : ι} [DecidablePred (· ≠ i)] (his : i ∈ s)
(hwi : w i = -1) : {x ∈ s | x ≠ i}.affineCombination k p w = p i := by
classical
rw [← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V, ← hw,
← s.affineCombination_sdiff_sub (singleton_subset_iff.2 his), sdiff_singleton_eq_erase,
← filter_ne']
congr
refine (affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero _ _ _ (mem_singleton_self _) ?_ ?_).symm
· simp [hwi]
· simp
/-- An affine combination over `s.subtype pred` equals one over `{x ∈ s | pred x}`. -/
theorem affineCombination_subtype_eq_filter (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (pred : ι → Prop)
[DecidablePred pred] :
((s.subtype pred).affineCombination k (fun i => p i) fun i => w i) =
{x ∈ s | pred x}.affineCombination k p w := by
rw [affineCombination_apply, affineCombination_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype_eq_filter]
/-- An affine combination over `{x ∈ s | pred x}` equals one over `s` if all the weights at indices
in `s` not satisfying `pred` are zero. -/
theorem affineCombination_filter_of_ne (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {pred : ι → Prop}
[DecidablePred pred] (h : ∀ i ∈ s, w i ≠ 0 → pred i) :
{x ∈ s | pred x}.affineCombination k p w = s.affineCombination k p w := by
rw [affineCombination_apply, affineCombination_apply,
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_filter_of_ne _ _ _ h]
/-- Suppose an indexed family of points is given, along with a subset
of the index type. A vector can be expressed as
`weightedVSubOfPoint` using a `Finset` lying within that subset and
with a given sum of weights if and only if it can be expressed as
`weightedVSubOfPoint` with that sum of weights for the
corresponding indexed family whose index type is the subtype
corresponding to that subset. -/
theorem eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subset_iff_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype {v : V} {x : k} {s : Set ι}
{p : ι → P} {b : P} :
(∃ fs : Finset ι, ↑fs ⊆ s ∧ ∃ w : ι → k, ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = x ∧
v = fs.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w) ↔
∃ (fs : Finset s) (w : s → k), ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = x ∧
v = fs.weightedVSubOfPoint (fun i : s => p i) b w := by
classical
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
constructor
· rintro ⟨fs, hfs, w, rfl, rfl⟩
exact ⟨fs.subtype s, fun i => w i, sum_subtype_of_mem _ hfs, (sum_subtype_of_mem _ hfs).symm⟩
· rintro ⟨fs, w, rfl, rfl⟩
refine
⟨fs.map (Function.Embedding.subtype _), map_subtype_subset _, fun i =>
if h : i ∈ s then w ⟨i, h⟩ else 0, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
simp
variable (k)
/-- Suppose an indexed family of points is given, along with a subset
of the index type. A vector can be expressed as `weightedVSub` using
a `Finset` lying within that subset and with sum of weights 0 if and
only if it can be expressed as `weightedVSub` with sum of weights 0
for the corresponding indexed family whose index type is the subtype
corresponding to that subset. -/
theorem eq_weightedVSub_subset_iff_eq_weightedVSub_subtype {v : V} {s : Set ι} {p : ι → P} :
(∃ fs : Finset ι, ↑fs ⊆ s ∧ ∃ w : ι → k, ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = 0 ∧
v = fs.weightedVSub p w) ↔
∃ (fs : Finset s) (w : s → k), ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = 0 ∧
v = fs.weightedVSub (fun i : s => p i) w :=
eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subset_iff_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype
variable (V)
/-- Suppose an indexed family of points is given, along with a subset
of the index type. A point can be expressed as an
`affineCombination` using a `Finset` lying within that subset and
with sum of weights 1 if and only if it can be expressed an
`affineCombination` with sum of weights 1 for the corresponding
indexed family whose index type is the subtype corresponding to that
subset. -/
theorem eq_affineCombination_subset_iff_eq_affineCombination_subtype {p0 : P} {s : Set ι}
{p : ι → P} :
(∃ fs : Finset ι, ↑fs ⊆ s ∧ ∃ w : ι → k, ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = 1 ∧
p0 = fs.affineCombination k p w) ↔
∃ (fs : Finset s) (w : s → k), ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = 1 ∧
p0 = fs.affineCombination k (fun i : s => p i) w := by
simp_rw [affineCombination_apply, eq_vadd_iff_vsub_eq]
exact eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subset_iff_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype
variable {k V}
/-- Affine maps commute with affine combinations. -/
theorem map_affineCombination {V₂ P₂ : Type*} [AddCommGroup V₂] [Module k V₂] [AffineSpace V₂ P₂]
(p : ι → P) (w : ι → k) (hw : s.sum w = 1) (f : P →ᵃ[k] P₂) :
f (s.affineCombination k p w) = s.affineCombination k (f ∘ p) w := by
have b := Classical.choice (inferInstance : AffineSpace V P).nonempty
have b₂ := Classical.choice (inferInstance : AffineSpace V₂ P₂).nonempty
rw [s.affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one w p hw b,
s.affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one w (f ∘ p) hw b₂, ←
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_eq_of_sum_eq_one w (f ∘ p) hw (f b) b₂]
simp only [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, RingHom.id_apply, AffineMap.map_vadd,
LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ, AffineMap.linearMap_vsub, map_sum, Function.comp_apply]
/-- The value of `affineCombination`, where the given points take only two values. -/
lemma affineCombination_apply_eq_lineMap_sum [DecidableEq ι] (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P)
(p₁ p₂ : P) (s' : Finset ι) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) (hp₂ : ∀ i ∈ s ∩ s', p i = p₂)
(hp₁ : ∀ i ∈ s \ s', p i = p₁) :
s.affineCombination k p w = AffineMap.lineMap p₁ p₂ (∑ i ∈ s ∩ s', w i) := by
rw [s.affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one w p h p₁,
weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← s.sum_inter_add_sum_diff s', AffineMap.lineMap_apply,
vadd_right_cancel_iff, sum_smul]
convert add_zero _ with i hi
· convert Finset.sum_const_zero with i hi
simp [hp₁ i hi]
· exact (hp₂ i hi).symm
variable (k)
/-- Weights for expressing a single point as an affine combination. -/
def affineCombinationSingleWeights [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) : ι → k :=
Pi.single i 1
@[simp]
theorem affineCombinationSingleWeights_apply_self [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) :
affineCombinationSingleWeights k i i = 1 := Pi.single_eq_same _ _
@[simp]
theorem affineCombinationSingleWeights_apply_of_ne [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (h : j ≠ i) :
affineCombinationSingleWeights k i j = 0 := Pi.single_eq_of_ne h _
@[simp]
theorem sum_affineCombinationSingleWeights [DecidableEq ι] {i : ι} (h : i ∈ s) :
∑ j ∈ s, affineCombinationSingleWeights k i j = 1 := by
rw [← affineCombinationSingleWeights_apply_self k i]
exact sum_eq_single_of_mem i h fun j _ hj => affineCombinationSingleWeights_apply_of_ne k hj
/-- Weights for expressing the subtraction of two points as a `weightedVSub`. -/
def weightedVSubVSubWeights [DecidableEq ι] (i j : ι) : ι → k :=
affineCombinationSingleWeights k i - affineCombinationSingleWeights k j
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSubVSubWeights_self [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) :
weightedVSubVSubWeights k i i = 0 := by simp [weightedVSubVSubWeights]
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSubVSubWeights_apply_left [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (h : i ≠ j) :
weightedVSubVSubWeights k i j i = 1 := by simp [weightedVSubVSubWeights, h]
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSubVSubWeights_apply_right [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (h : i ≠ j) :
weightedVSubVSubWeights k i j j = -1 := by simp [weightedVSubVSubWeights, h.symm]
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSubVSubWeights_apply_of_ne [DecidableEq ι] {i j t : ι} (hi : t ≠ i) (hj : t ≠ j) :
weightedVSubVSubWeights k i j t = 0 := by simp [weightedVSubVSubWeights, hi, hj]
@[simp]
theorem sum_weightedVSubVSubWeights [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) (hj : j ∈ s) :
∑ t ∈ s, weightedVSubVSubWeights k i j t = 0 := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubVSubWeights, Pi.sub_apply, sum_sub_distrib]
simp [hi, hj]
variable {k}
/-- Weights for expressing `lineMap` as an affine combination. -/
def affineCombinationLineMapWeights [DecidableEq ι] (i j : ι) (c : k) : ι → k :=
c • weightedVSubVSubWeights k j i + affineCombinationSingleWeights k i
@[simp]
theorem affineCombinationLineMapWeights_self [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) (c : k) :
affineCombinationLineMapWeights i i c = affineCombinationSingleWeights k i := by
simp [affineCombinationLineMapWeights]
@[simp]
theorem affineCombinationLineMapWeights_apply_left [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (h : i ≠ j) (c : k) :
affineCombinationLineMapWeights i j c i = 1 - c := by
simp [affineCombinationLineMapWeights, h.symm, sub_eq_neg_add]
@[simp]
theorem affineCombinationLineMapWeights_apply_right [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (h : i ≠ j) (c : k) :
affineCombinationLineMapWeights i j c j = c := by
simp [affineCombinationLineMapWeights, h.symm]
@[simp]
theorem affineCombinationLineMapWeights_apply_of_ne [DecidableEq ι] {i j t : ι} (hi : t ≠ i)
(hj : t ≠ j) (c : k) : affineCombinationLineMapWeights i j c t = 0 := by
simp [affineCombinationLineMapWeights, hi, hj]
@[simp]
theorem sum_affineCombinationLineMapWeights [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) (hj : j ∈ s)
(c : k) : ∑ t ∈ s, affineCombinationLineMapWeights i j c t = 1 := by
simp_rw [affineCombinationLineMapWeights, Pi.add_apply, sum_add_distrib]
simp [hi, hj, ← mul_sum]
variable (k)
/-- An affine combination with `affineCombinationSingleWeights` gives the specified point. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_affineCombinationSingleWeights [DecidableEq ι] (p : ι → P) {i : ι}
(hi : i ∈ s) : s.affineCombination k p (affineCombinationSingleWeights k i) = p i := by
refine s.affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero _ _ hi (by simp) ?_
rintro j - hj
simp [hj]
/-- A weighted subtraction with `weightedVSubVSubWeights` gives the result of subtracting the
specified points. -/
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSub_weightedVSubVSubWeights [DecidableEq ι] (p : ι → P) {i j : ι} (hi : i ∈ s)
(hj : j ∈ s) : s.weightedVSub p (weightedVSubVSubWeights k i j) = p i -ᵥ p j := by
rw [weightedVSubVSubWeights, ← affineCombination_vsub,
s.affineCombination_affineCombinationSingleWeights k p hi,
s.affineCombination_affineCombinationSingleWeights k p hj]
variable {k}
/-- An affine combination with `affineCombinationLineMapWeights` gives the result of
`line_map`. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_affineCombinationLineMapWeights [DecidableEq ι] (p : ι → P) {i j : ι}
(hi : i ∈ s) (hj : j ∈ s) (c : k) :
s.affineCombination k p (affineCombinationLineMapWeights i j c) =
AffineMap.lineMap (p i) (p j) c := by
rw [affineCombinationLineMapWeights, ← weightedVSub_vadd_affineCombination,
weightedVSub_const_smul, s.affineCombination_affineCombinationSingleWeights k p hi,
| s.weightedVSub_weightedVSubVSubWeights k p hj hi, AffineMap.lineMap_apply]
end Finset
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/AffineSpace/Combination.lean | 716 | 718 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Bhavik Mehta, Adam Topaz
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.Category
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.FullyFaithful
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.ReflectsIso.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.StrongEpi
/-!
# Monads
We construct the categories of monads and comonads, and their forgetful functors to endofunctors.
(Note that these are the category theorist's monads, not the programmers monads.
For the translation, see the file `CategoryTheory.Monad.Types`.)
For the fact that monads are "just" monoids in the category of endofunctors, see the file
`CategoryTheory.Monad.EquivMon`.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category
universe v₁ u₁
-- morphism levels before object levels. See note [CategoryTheory universes].
variable (C : Type u₁) [Category.{v₁} C]
/-- The data of a monad on C consists of an endofunctor T together with natural transformations
η : 𝟭 C ⟶ T and μ : T ⋙ T ⟶ T satisfying three equations:
- T μ_X ≫ μ_X = μ_(TX) ≫ μ_X (associativity)
- η_(TX) ≫ μ_X = 1_X (left unit)
- Tη_X ≫ μ_X = 1_X (right unit)
-/
structure Monad extends C ⥤ C where
/-- The unit for the monad. -/
η : 𝟭 _ ⟶ toFunctor
/-- The multiplication for the monad. -/
μ : toFunctor ⋙ toFunctor ⟶ toFunctor
assoc : ∀ X, toFunctor.map (NatTrans.app μ X) ≫ μ.app _ = μ.app _ ≫ μ.app _ := by aesop_cat
left_unit : ∀ X : C, η.app (toFunctor.obj X) ≫ μ.app _ = 𝟙 _ := by aesop_cat
right_unit : ∀ X : C, toFunctor.map (η.app X) ≫ μ.app _ = 𝟙 _ := by aesop_cat
/-- The data of a comonad on C consists of an endofunctor G together with natural transformations
ε : G ⟶ 𝟭 C and δ : G ⟶ G ⋙ G satisfying three equations:
- δ_X ≫ G δ_X = δ_X ≫ δ_(GX) (coassociativity)
- δ_X ≫ ε_(GX) = 1_X (left counit)
- δ_X ≫ G ε_X = 1_X (right counit)
-/
structure Comonad extends C ⥤ C where
/-- The counit for the comonad. -/
ε : toFunctor ⟶ 𝟭 _
/-- The comultiplication for the comonad. -/
δ : toFunctor ⟶ toFunctor ⋙ toFunctor
coassoc : ∀ X, NatTrans.app δ _ ≫ toFunctor.map (δ.app X) = δ.app _ ≫ δ.app _ := by
aesop_cat
left_counit : ∀ X : C, δ.app X ≫ ε.app (toFunctor.obj X) = 𝟙 _ := by aesop_cat
right_counit : ∀ X : C, δ.app X ≫ toFunctor.map (ε.app X) = 𝟙 _ := by aesop_cat
variable {C}
variable (T : Monad C) (G : Comonad C)
instance coeMonad : Coe (Monad C) (C ⥤ C) :=
⟨fun T => T.toFunctor⟩
instance coeComonad : Coe (Comonad C) (C ⥤ C) :=
⟨fun G => G.toFunctor⟩
-- Porting note: these lemmas are syntactic tautologies
--@[simp]
--theorem monad_toFunctor_eq_coe : T.toFunctor = T :=
-- rfl
--
--@[simp]
--theorem comonad_toFunctor_eq_coe : G.toFunctor = G :=
-- rfl
initialize_simps_projections CategoryTheory.Monad (toFunctor → coe)
initialize_simps_projections CategoryTheory.Comonad (toFunctor → coe)
-- Porting note: investigate whether `Monad.assoc` can be a `simp` lemma?
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] Monad.left_unit Monad.right_unit
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] Comonad.coassoc Comonad.left_counit Comonad.right_counit
/-- A morphism of monads is a natural transformation compatible with η and μ. -/
@[ext]
structure MonadHom (T₁ T₂ : Monad C) extends NatTrans (T₁ : C ⥤ C) T₂ where
app_η : ∀ X, T₁.η.app X ≫ app X = T₂.η.app X := by aesop_cat
app_μ : ∀ X, T₁.μ.app X ≫ app X = (T₁.map (app X) ≫ app _) ≫ T₂.μ.app X := by
aesop_cat
initialize_simps_projections MonadHom (+toNatTrans, -app)
/-- A morphism of comonads is a natural transformation compatible with ε and δ. -/
@[ext]
structure ComonadHom (M N : Comonad C) extends NatTrans (M : C ⥤ C) N where
app_ε : ∀ X, app X ≫ N.ε.app X = M.ε.app X := by aesop_cat
app_δ : ∀ X, app X ≫ N.δ.app X = M.δ.app X ≫ app _ ≫ N.map (app X) := by aesop_cat
initialize_simps_projections ComonadHom (+toNatTrans, -app)
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] MonadHom.app_η MonadHom.app_μ
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] ComonadHom.app_ε ComonadHom.app_δ
instance : Quiver (Monad C) where
Hom := MonadHom
instance : Quiver (Comonad C) where
Hom := ComonadHom
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10688): added to ease automation
@[ext]
lemma MonadHom.ext' {T₁ T₂ : Monad C} (f g : T₁ ⟶ T₂) (h : f.app = g.app) : f = g :=
MonadHom.ext h
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/10688): added to ease automation
@[ext]
lemma ComonadHom.ext' {T₁ T₂ : Comonad C} (f g : T₁ ⟶ T₂) (h : f.app = g.app) : f = g :=
ComonadHom.ext h
instance : Category (Monad C) where
id M := { toNatTrans := 𝟙 (M : C ⥤ C) }
comp f g :=
{ toNatTrans :=
{ app := fun X => f.app X ≫ g.app X
naturality := fun X Y h => by rw [assoc, f.1.naturality_assoc, g.1.naturality] } }
-- `aesop_cat` can fill in these proofs, but is unfortunately slightly slow.
id_comp _ := MonadHom.ext (by funext; simp only [NatTrans.id_app, id_comp])
comp_id _ := MonadHom.ext (by funext; simp only [NatTrans.id_app, comp_id])
assoc _ _ _ := MonadHom.ext (by funext; simp only [assoc])
instance : Category (Comonad C) where
id M := { toNatTrans := 𝟙 (M : C ⥤ C) }
comp f g :=
{ toNatTrans :=
{ app := fun X => f.app X ≫ g.app X
naturality := fun X Y h => by rw [assoc, f.1.naturality_assoc, g.1.naturality] } }
-- `aesop_cat` can fill in these proofs, but is unfortunately slightly slow.
id_comp _ := ComonadHom.ext (by funext; simp only [NatTrans.id_app, id_comp])
comp_id _ := ComonadHom.ext (by funext; simp only [NatTrans.id_app, comp_id])
assoc _ _ _ := ComonadHom.ext (by funext; simp only [assoc])
instance {T : Monad C} : Inhabited (MonadHom T T) :=
⟨𝟙 T⟩
@[simp]
theorem MonadHom.id_toNatTrans (T : Monad C) : (𝟙 T : T ⟶ T).toNatTrans = 𝟙 (T : C ⥤ C) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem MonadHom.comp_toNatTrans {T₁ T₂ T₃ : Monad C} (f : T₁ ⟶ T₂) (g : T₂ ⟶ T₃) :
(f ≫ g).toNatTrans = ((f.toNatTrans : _ ⟶ (T₂ : C ⥤ C)) ≫ g.toNatTrans : (T₁ : C ⥤ C) ⟶ T₃) :=
rfl
instance {G : Comonad C} : Inhabited (ComonadHom G G) :=
⟨𝟙 G⟩
@[simp]
theorem ComonadHom.id_toNatTrans (T : Comonad C) : (𝟙 T : T ⟶ T).toNatTrans = 𝟙 (T : C ⥤ C) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_toNatTrans {T₁ T₂ T₃ : Comonad C} (f : T₁ ⟶ T₂) (g : T₂ ⟶ T₃) :
(f ≫ g).toNatTrans = ((f.toNatTrans : _ ⟶ (T₂ : C ⥤ C)) ≫ g.toNatTrans : (T₁ : C ⥤ C) ⟶ T₃) :=
rfl
/-- Construct a monad isomorphism from a natural isomorphism of functors where the forward
direction is a monad morphism. -/
@[simps]
def MonadIso.mk {M N : Monad C} (f : (M : C ⥤ C) ≅ N)
(f_η : ∀ (X : C), M.η.app X ≫ f.hom.app X = N.η.app X := by aesop_cat)
(f_μ : ∀ (X : C), M.μ.app X ≫ f.hom.app X =
(M.map (f.hom.app X) ≫ f.hom.app (N.obj X)) ≫ N.μ.app X := by aesop_cat) : M ≅ N where
hom :=
{ toNatTrans := f.hom
app_η := f_η
app_μ := f_μ }
inv :=
{ toNatTrans := f.inv
app_η := fun X => by simp [← f_η]
app_μ := fun X => by
rw [← NatIso.cancel_natIso_hom_right f]
simp only [NatTrans.naturality, Iso.inv_hom_id_app, assoc, comp_id, f_μ,
NatTrans.naturality_assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id_app_assoc, ← Functor.map_comp_assoc]
simp }
/-- Construct a comonad isomorphism from a natural isomorphism of functors where the forward
direction is a comonad morphism. -/
@[simps]
def ComonadIso.mk {M N : Comonad C} (f : (M : C ⥤ C) ≅ N)
(f_ε : ∀ (X : C), f.hom.app X ≫ N.ε.app X = M.ε.app X := by aesop_cat)
(f_δ : ∀ (X : C), f.hom.app X ≫ N.δ.app X =
M.δ.app X ≫ f.hom.app (M.obj X) ≫ N.map (f.hom.app X) := by aesop_cat) : M ≅ N where
hom :=
{ toNatTrans := f.hom
app_ε := f_ε
app_δ := f_δ }
inv :=
{ toNatTrans := f.inv
app_ε := fun X => by simp [← f_ε]
app_δ := fun X => by
rw [← NatIso.cancel_natIso_hom_left f]
simp only [reassoc_of% (f_δ X), Iso.hom_inv_id_app_assoc, NatTrans.naturality_assoc]
rw [← Functor.map_comp, Iso.hom_inv_id_app, Functor.map_id]
apply (comp_id _).symm }
variable (C)
/-- The forgetful functor from the category of monads to the category of endofunctors.
-/
@[simps!]
def monadToFunctor : Monad C ⥤ C ⥤ C where
obj T := T
map f := f.toNatTrans
instance : (monadToFunctor C).Faithful where
theorem monadToFunctor_mapIso_monad_iso_mk {M N : Monad C} (f : (M : C ⥤ C) ≅ N) (f_η f_μ) :
(monadToFunctor _).mapIso (MonadIso.mk f f_η f_μ) = f := by
ext
rfl
instance : (monadToFunctor C).ReflectsIsomorphisms where
reflects f _ := (MonadIso.mk (asIso ((monadToFunctor C).map f)) f.app_η f.app_μ).isIso_hom
/-- The forgetful functor from the category of comonads to the category of endofunctors.
-/
@[simps!]
def comonadToFunctor : Comonad C ⥤ C ⥤ C where
obj G := G
map f := f.toNatTrans
instance : (comonadToFunctor C).Faithful where
theorem comonadToFunctor_mapIso_comonad_iso_mk {M N : Comonad C} (f : (M : C ⥤ C) ≅ N) (f_ε f_δ) :
(comonadToFunctor _).mapIso (ComonadIso.mk f f_ε f_δ) = f := by
ext
rfl
instance : (comonadToFunctor C).ReflectsIsomorphisms where
reflects f _ := (ComonadIso.mk (asIso ((comonadToFunctor C).map f)) f.app_ε f.app_δ).isIso_hom
variable {C}
/-- An isomorphism of monads gives a natural isomorphism of the underlying functors.
-/
/- Porting note: removed
`@[simps (config := { rhsMd := semireducible })]`
and replaced with `@[simps]` in the two declarations below -/
@[simps!]
def MonadIso.toNatIso {M N : Monad C} (h : M ≅ N) : (M : C ⥤ C) ≅ N :=
(monadToFunctor C).mapIso h
/-- An isomorphism of comonads gives a natural isomorphism of the underlying functors.
-/
@[simps!]
def ComonadIso.toNatIso {M N : Comonad C} (h : M ≅ N) : (M : C ⥤ C) ≅ N :=
(comonadToFunctor C).mapIso h
variable (C)
namespace Monad
/-- The identity monad. -/
@[simps!]
def id : Monad C where
toFunctor := 𝟭 C
η := 𝟙 (𝟭 C)
μ := 𝟙 (𝟭 C)
instance : Inhabited (Monad C) :=
⟨Monad.id C⟩
end Monad
namespace Comonad
/-- The identity comonad. -/
@[simps!]
def id : Comonad C where
toFunctor := 𝟭 _
ε := 𝟙 (𝟭 C)
δ := 𝟙 (𝟭 C)
instance : Inhabited (Comonad C) :=
⟨Comonad.id C⟩
end Comonad
open Iso Functor
variable {C}
namespace Monad
/-- Transport a monad structure on a functor along an isomorphism of functors. -/
def transport {F : C ⥤ C} (T : Monad C) (i : (T : C ⥤ C) ≅ F) : Monad C where
toFunctor := F
η := T.η ≫ i.hom
μ := (i.inv ◫ i.inv) ≫ T.μ ≫ i.hom
left_unit X := by
simp only [Functor.id_obj, NatTrans.comp_app, comp_obj, NatTrans.hcomp_app, Category.assoc,
hom_inv_id_app_assoc]
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [← T.η.naturality (i.inv.app X), ]
simp
right_unit X := by
simp only [id_obj, NatTrans.comp_app, Functor.map_comp, comp_obj, NatTrans.hcomp_app,
Category.assoc, NatTrans.naturality_assoc]
slice_lhs 2 4 =>
simp only [← T.map_comp]
simp
assoc X := by
simp only [comp_obj, NatTrans.comp_app, NatTrans.hcomp_app, Category.assoc, Functor.map_comp,
NatTrans.naturality_assoc, hom_inv_id_app_assoc, NatIso.cancel_natIso_inv_left]
slice_lhs 4 5 => rw [← T.map_comp]
simp only [hom_inv_id_app, Functor.map_id, id_comp]
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [← T.map_comp]
simp only [Functor.map_comp, Category.assoc]
congr 1
simp only [← Category.assoc, NatIso.cancel_natIso_hom_right]
rw [← T.μ.naturality]
simp [T.assoc X]
end Monad
namespace Comonad
/-- Transport a comonad structure on a functor along an isomorphism of functors. -/
def transport {F : C ⥤ C} (T : Comonad C) (i : (T : C ⥤ C) ≅ F) : Comonad C where
toFunctor := F
ε := i.inv ≫ T.ε
δ := i.inv ≫ T.δ ≫ (i.hom ◫ i.hom)
right_counit X := by
| simp only [id_obj, comp_obj, NatTrans.comp_app, NatTrans.hcomp_app, Functor.map_comp, assoc]
slice_lhs 4 5 => rw [← F.map_comp]
simp only [hom_inv_id_app, Functor.map_id, id_comp, ← i.hom.naturality]
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [T.right_counit]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monad/Basic.lean | 339 | 342 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Mul
import Mathlib.Data.PEquiv
/-!
# partial equivalences for matrices
Using partial equivalences to represent matrices.
This file introduces the function `PEquiv.toMatrix`, which returns a matrix containing ones and
zeros. For any partial equivalence `f`, `f.toMatrix i j = 1 ↔ f i = some j`.
The following important properties of this function are proved
`toMatrix_trans : (f.trans g).toMatrix = f.toMatrix * g.toMatrix`
`toMatrix_symm : f.symm.toMatrix = f.toMatrixᵀ`
`toMatrix_refl : (PEquiv.refl n).toMatrix = 1`
`toMatrix_bot : ⊥.toMatrix = 0`
This theory gives the matrix representation of projection linear maps, and their right inverses.
For example, the matrix `(single (0 : Fin 1) (i : Fin n)).toMatrix` corresponds to the ith
projection map from R^n to R.
Any injective function `Fin m → Fin n` gives rise to a `PEquiv`, whose matrix is the projection
map from R^m → R^n represented by the same function. The transpose of this matrix is the right
inverse of this map, sending anything not in the image to zero.
## notations
This file uses `ᵀ` for `Matrix.transpose`.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
namespace PEquiv
open Matrix
universe u v
variable {k l m n : Type*}
variable {α β : Type*}
open Matrix
/-- `toMatrix` returns a matrix containing ones and zeros. `f.toMatrix i j` is `1` if
`f i = some j` and `0` otherwise -/
def toMatrix [DecidableEq n] [Zero α] [One α] (f : m ≃. n) : Matrix m n α :=
of fun i j => if j ∈ f i then (1 : α) else 0
-- TODO: set as an equation lemma for `toMatrix`, see https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/3024
@[simp]
theorem toMatrix_apply [DecidableEq n] [Zero α] [One α] (f : m ≃. n) (i j) :
toMatrix f i j = if j ∈ f i then (1 : α) else 0 :=
rfl
theorem toMatrix_mul_apply [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] [NonAssocSemiring α] (f : l ≃. m) (i j)
(M : Matrix m n α) : (f.toMatrix * M :) i j = Option.casesOn (f i) 0 fun fi => M fi j := by
dsimp [toMatrix, Matrix.mul_apply]
rcases h : f i with - | fi
· simp [h]
· rw [Finset.sum_eq_single fi] <;> simp +contextual [h, eq_comm]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-27")] alias mul_matrix_apply := toMatrix_mul_apply
theorem mul_toMatrix_apply [Fintype m] [NonAssocSemiring α] [DecidableEq n] (M : Matrix l m α)
(f : m ≃. n) (i j) : (M * f.toMatrix :) i j = Option.casesOn (f.symm j) 0 (M i) := by
dsimp [Matrix.mul_apply, toMatrix_apply]
rcases h : f.symm j with - | fj
· simp [h, ← f.eq_some_iff]
· rw [Finset.sum_eq_single fj]
· simp [h, ← f.eq_some_iff]
· rintro b - n
simp [h, ← f.eq_some_iff, n.symm]
· simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-27")] alias matrix_mul_apply := mul_toMatrix_apply
theorem toMatrix_symm [DecidableEq m] [DecidableEq n] [Zero α] [One α] (f : m ≃. n) :
(f.symm.toMatrix : Matrix n m α) = f.toMatrixᵀ := by
ext
simp only [transpose, mem_iff_mem f, toMatrix_apply]
congr
@[simp]
theorem toMatrix_refl [DecidableEq n] [Zero α] [One α] :
((PEquiv.refl n).toMatrix : Matrix n n α) = 1 := by
ext
simp [toMatrix_apply, one_apply]
@[simp]
theorem toMatrix_toPEquiv_apply [DecidableEq n] [Zero α] [One α] (f : m ≃ n) (i) :
f.toPEquiv.toMatrix i = Pi.single (f i) (1 : α) := by
ext
simp [toMatrix_apply, Pi.single_apply, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem transpose_toMatrix_toPEquiv_apply
[DecidableEq m] [DecidableEq n] [Zero α] [One α] (f : m ≃ n) (j) :
| f.toPEquiv.toMatrixᵀ j = Pi.single (f.symm j) (1 : α) := by
ext
simp [toMatrix_apply, Pi.single_apply, eq_comm, ← Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply]
theorem toMatrix_toPEquiv_mul [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
| Mathlib/Data/Matrix/PEquiv.lean | 102 | 106 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn, Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.InitialSeg
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Basic
/-!
# Ordinal arithmetic
Ordinals have an addition (corresponding to disjoint union) that turns them into an additive
monoid, and a multiplication (corresponding to the lexicographic order on the product) that turns
them into a monoid. One can also define correspondingly a subtraction, a division, a successor
function, a power function and a logarithm function.
We also define limit ordinals and prove the basic induction principle on ordinals separating
successor ordinals and limit ordinals, in `limitRecOn`.
## Main definitions and results
* `o₁ + o₂` is the order on the disjoint union of `o₁` and `o₂` obtained by declaring that
every element of `o₁` is smaller than every element of `o₂`.
* `o₁ - o₂` is the unique ordinal `o` such that `o₂ + o = o₁`, when `o₂ ≤ o₁`.
* `o₁ * o₂` is the lexicographic order on `o₂ × o₁`.
* `o₁ / o₂` is the ordinal `o` such that `o₁ = o₂ * o + o'` with `o' < o₂`. We also define the
divisibility predicate, and a modulo operation.
* `Order.succ o = o + 1` is the successor of `o`.
* `pred o` if the predecessor of `o`. If `o` is not a successor, we set `pred o = o`.
We discuss the properties of casts of natural numbers of and of `ω` with respect to these
operations.
Some properties of the operations are also used to discuss general tools on ordinals:
* `IsLimit o`: an ordinal is a limit ordinal if it is neither `0` nor a successor.
* `limitRecOn` is the main induction principle of ordinals: if one can prove a property by
induction at successor ordinals and at limit ordinals, then it holds for all ordinals.
* `IsNormal`: a function `f : Ordinal → Ordinal` satisfies `IsNormal` if it is strictly increasing
and order-continuous, i.e., the image `f o` of a limit ordinal `o` is the sup of `f a` for
`a < o`.
Various other basic arithmetic results are given in `Principal.lean` instead.
-/
assert_not_exists Field Module
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Equiv Order
open scoped Ordinal
universe u v w
namespace Ordinal
variable {α β γ : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} {t : γ → γ → Prop}
/-! ### Further properties of addition on ordinals -/
@[simp]
theorem lift_add (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a + b) = lift.{u} a + lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.sumLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _) (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_succ (a : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (succ a) = succ (lift.{u} a) := by
rw [← add_one_eq_succ, lift_add, lift_one]
rfl
instance instAddLeftReflectLE :
AddLeftReflectLE Ordinal.{u} where
elim c a b := by
refine inductionOn₃ a b c fun α r _ β s _ γ t _ ⟨f⟩ ↦ ?_
have H₁ a : f (Sum.inl a) = Sum.inl a := by
simpa using ((InitialSeg.leAdd t r).trans f).eq (InitialSeg.leAdd t s) a
have H₂ a : ∃ b, f (Sum.inr a) = Sum.inr b := by
generalize hx : f (Sum.inr a) = x
obtain x | x := x
· rw [← H₁, f.inj] at hx
contradiction
· exact ⟨x, rfl⟩
choose g hg using H₂
refine (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone g fun _ _ h ↦ ?_).ordinal_type_le
rwa [← @Sum.lex_inr_inr _ t _ s, ← hg, ← hg, f.map_rel_iff, Sum.lex_inr_inr]
instance : IsLeftCancelAdd Ordinal where
add_left_cancel a b c h := by simpa only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_left] using h
@[deprecated add_left_cancel_iff (since := "2024-12-11")]
protected theorem add_left_cancel (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c :=
add_left_cancel_iff
private theorem add_lt_add_iff_left' (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b < a + c ↔ b < c := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_le, add_le_add_iff_left]
instance instAddLeftStrictMono : AddLeftStrictMono Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a _b _c ↦ (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).2⟩
instance instAddLeftReflectLT : AddLeftReflectLT Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a _b _c ↦ (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).1⟩
instance instAddRightReflectLT : AddRightReflectLT Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun _a _b _c ↦ lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h => add_le_add_right h _⟩
theorem add_le_add_iff_right {a b : Ordinal} : ∀ n : ℕ, a + n ≤ b + n ↔ a ≤ b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by
simp only [natCast_succ, add_succ, add_succ, succ_le_succ_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
theorem add_right_cancel {a b : Ordinal} (n : ℕ) : a + n = b + n ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
theorem add_eq_zero_iff {a b : Ordinal} : a + b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun α r _ β s _ => by
simp_rw [← type_sum_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty]
exact isEmpty_sum
theorem left_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : a = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).1
theorem right_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : b = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).2
/-! ### The predecessor of an ordinal -/
open Classical in
/-- The ordinal predecessor of `o` is `o'` if `o = succ o'`,
and `o` otherwise. -/
def pred (o : Ordinal) : Ordinal :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then Classical.choose h else o
@[simp]
theorem pred_succ (o) : pred (succ o) = o := by
have h : ∃ a, succ o = succ a := ⟨_, rfl⟩
simpa only [pred, dif_pos h] using (succ_injective <| Classical.choose_spec h).symm
theorem pred_le_self (o) : pred o ≤ o := by
classical
exact if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by
let ⟨a, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ]; exact le_succ a
else by rw [pred, dif_neg h]
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ {o} : pred o = o ↔ ¬∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e ⟨a, e'⟩ => by rw [e', pred_succ] at e; exact (lt_succ a).ne e, fun h => dif_neg h⟩
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ' {o} : pred o = o ↔ ∀ a, o ≠ succ a := by
simpa using pred_eq_iff_not_succ
theorem pred_lt_iff_is_succ {o} : pred o < o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
Iff.trans (by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, pred_le_self, true_and, not_le])
(iff_not_comm.1 pred_eq_iff_not_succ).symm
@[simp]
theorem pred_zero : pred 0 = 0 :=
pred_eq_iff_not_succ'.2 fun a => (succ_ne_zero a).symm
theorem succ_pred_iff_is_succ {o} : succ (pred o) = o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e => ⟨_, e.symm⟩, fun ⟨a, e⟩ => by simp only [e, pred_succ]⟩
theorem succ_lt_of_not_succ {o b : Ordinal} (h : ¬∃ a, o = succ a) : succ b < o ↔ b < o :=
⟨(lt_succ b).trans, fun l => lt_of_le_of_ne (succ_le_of_lt l) fun e => h ⟨_, e.symm⟩⟩
theorem lt_pred {a b} : a < pred b ↔ succ a < b := by
classical
exact if h : ∃ a, b = succ a then by
let ⟨c, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ, succ_lt_succ_iff]
else by simp only [pred, dif_neg h, succ_lt_of_not_succ h]
theorem pred_le {a b} : pred a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ succ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 lt_pred
@[simp]
theorem lift_is_succ {o : Ordinal.{v}} : (∃ a, lift.{u} o = succ a) ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ =>
let ⟨b, e⟩ := mem_range_lift_of_le <| show a ≤ lift.{u} o from le_of_lt <| h.symm ▸ lt_succ a
⟨b, (lift_inj.{u,v}).1 <| by rw [h, ← e, lift_succ]⟩,
fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨lift.{u} a, by simp only [h, lift_succ]⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_pred (o : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (pred o) = pred (lift.{u} o) := by
classical
exact if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by obtain ⟨a, e⟩ := h; simp only [e, pred_succ, lift_succ]
else by rw [pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 h, pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 (mt lift_is_succ.1 h)]
/-! ### Limit ordinals -/
/-- A limit ordinal is an ordinal which is not zero and not a successor.
TODO: deprecate this in favor of `Order.IsSuccLimit`. -/
def IsLimit (o : Ordinal) : Prop :=
IsSuccLimit o
theorem isLimit_iff {o} : IsLimit o ↔ o ≠ 0 ∧ IsSuccPrelimit o := by
simp [IsLimit, IsSuccLimit]
theorem IsLimit.isSuccPrelimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : IsSuccPrelimit o :=
IsSuccLimit.isSuccPrelimit h
theorem IsLimit.succ_lt {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : a < o → succ a < o :=
IsSuccLimit.succ_lt h
theorem isSuccPrelimit_zero : IsSuccPrelimit (0 : Ordinal) := isSuccPrelimit_bot
theorem not_zero_isLimit : ¬IsLimit 0 :=
not_isSuccLimit_bot
theorem not_succ_isLimit (o) : ¬IsLimit (succ o) :=
not_isSuccLimit_succ o
theorem not_succ_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : ¬∃ a, o = succ a
| ⟨a, e⟩ => not_succ_isLimit a (e ▸ h)
theorem succ_lt_of_isLimit {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : succ a < o ↔ a < o :=
IsSuccLimit.succ_lt_iff h
theorem le_succ_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : o ≤ succ a ↔ o ≤ a :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 <| succ_lt_of_isLimit h
theorem limit_le {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : o ≤ a ↔ ∀ x < o, x ≤ a :=
⟨fun h _x l => l.le.trans h, fun H =>
(le_succ_of_isLimit h).1 <| le_of_not_lt fun hn => not_lt_of_le (H _ hn) (lt_succ a)⟩
theorem lt_limit {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : a < o ↔ ∃ x < o, a < x := by
-- Porting note: `bex_def` is required.
simpa only [not_forall₂, not_le, bex_def] using not_congr (@limit_le _ h a)
@[simp]
theorem lift_isLimit (o : Ordinal.{v}) : IsLimit (lift.{u,v} o) ↔ IsLimit o :=
liftInitialSeg.isSuccLimit_apply_iff
theorem IsLimit.pos {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : 0 < o :=
IsSuccLimit.bot_lt h
theorem IsLimit.ne_zero {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : o ≠ 0 :=
h.pos.ne'
theorem IsLimit.one_lt {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : 1 < o := by
simpa only [succ_zero] using h.succ_lt h.pos
theorem IsLimit.nat_lt {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : ∀ n : ℕ, (n : Ordinal) < o
| 0 => h.pos
| n + 1 => h.succ_lt (IsLimit.nat_lt h n)
theorem zero_or_succ_or_limit (o : Ordinal) : o = 0 ∨ (∃ a, o = succ a) ∨ IsLimit o := by
simpa [eq_comm] using isMin_or_mem_range_succ_or_isSuccLimit o
theorem isLimit_of_not_succ_of_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} (h : ¬∃ a, o = succ a) (h' : o ≠ 0) :
IsLimit o := ((zero_or_succ_or_limit o).resolve_left h').resolve_left h
-- TODO: this is an iff with `IsSuccPrelimit`
theorem IsLimit.sSup_Iio {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : sSup (Iio o) = o := by
apply (csSup_le' (fun a ha ↦ le_of_lt ha)).antisymm
apply le_of_forall_lt
intro a ha
exact (lt_succ a).trans_le (le_csSup bddAbove_Iio (h.succ_lt ha))
theorem IsLimit.iSup_Iio {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : ⨆ a : Iio o, a.1 = o := by
rw [← sSup_eq_iSup', h.sSup_Iio]
/-- Main induction principle of ordinals: if one can prove a property by
induction at successor ordinals and at limit ordinals, then it holds for all ordinals. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def limitRecOn {motive : Ordinal → Sort*} (o : Ordinal)
(zero : motive 0) (succ : ∀ o, motive o → motive (succ o))
(isLimit : ∀ o, IsLimit o → (∀ o' < o, motive o') → motive o) : motive o := by
refine SuccOrder.limitRecOn o (fun a ha ↦ ?_) (fun a _ ↦ succ a) isLimit
convert zero
simpa using ha
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_zero {motive} (H₁ H₂ H₃) : @limitRecOn motive 0 H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₁ :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn_isMin _ _ _ isMin_bot
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_succ {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@limitRecOn motive (succ o) H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₂ o (@limitRecOn motive o H₁ H₂ H₃) :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn_succ ..
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_limit {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃ h) :
@limitRecOn motive o H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₃ o h fun x _h => @limitRecOn motive x H₁ H₂ H₃ :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn_of_isSuccLimit ..
/-- Bounded recursion on ordinals. Similar to `limitRecOn`, with the assumption `o < l`
added to all cases. The final term's domain is the ordinals below `l`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def boundedLimitRecOn {l : Ordinal} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive : Iio l → Sort*} (o : Iio l)
(zero : motive ⟨0, lLim.pos⟩)
(succ : (o : Iio l) → motive o → motive ⟨succ o, lLim.succ_lt o.2⟩)
(isLimit : (o : Iio l) → IsLimit o → (Π o' < o, motive o') → motive o) : motive o :=
limitRecOn (motive := fun p ↦ (h : p < l) → motive ⟨p, h⟩) o.1 (fun _ ↦ zero)
(fun o ih h ↦ succ ⟨o, _⟩ <| ih <| (lt_succ o).trans h)
(fun _o ho ih _ ↦ isLimit _ ho fun _o' h ↦ ih _ h _) o.2
@[simp]
theorem boundedLimitRec_zero {l} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive} (H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive ⟨0, lLim.pos⟩ H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₁ := by
rw [boundedLimitRecOn, limitRecOn_zero]
@[simp]
theorem boundedLimitRec_succ {l} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive ⟨succ o.1, lLim.succ_lt o.2⟩ H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₂ o
(@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive o H₁ H₂ H₃) := by
rw [boundedLimitRecOn, limitRecOn_succ]
rfl
theorem boundedLimitRec_limit {l} (lLim : l.IsLimit) {motive} (o H₁ H₂ H₃ oLim) :
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive o H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₃ o oLim (fun x _ ↦
@boundedLimitRecOn l lLim motive x H₁ H₂ H₃) := by
rw [boundedLimitRecOn, limitRecOn_limit]
rfl
instance orderTopToTypeSucc (o : Ordinal) : OrderTop (succ o).toType :=
@OrderTop.mk _ _ (Top.mk _) le_enum_succ
theorem enum_succ_eq_top {o : Ordinal} :
enum (α := (succ o).toType) (· < ·) ⟨o, type_toType _ ▸ lt_succ o⟩ = ⊤ :=
rfl
theorem has_succ_of_type_succ_lt {α} {r : α → α → Prop} [wo : IsWellOrder α r]
(h : ∀ a < type r, succ a < type r) (x : α) : ∃ y, r x y := by
use enum r ⟨succ (typein r x), h _ (typein_lt_type r x)⟩
convert enum_lt_enum.mpr _
· rw [enum_typein]
· rw [Subtype.mk_lt_mk, lt_succ_iff]
theorem toType_noMax_of_succ_lt {o : Ordinal} (ho : ∀ a < o, succ a < o) : NoMaxOrder o.toType :=
⟨has_succ_of_type_succ_lt (type_toType _ ▸ ho)⟩
theorem bounded_singleton {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] (hr : (type r).IsLimit) (x) :
Bounded r {x} := by
refine ⟨enum r ⟨succ (typein r x), hr.succ_lt (typein_lt_type r x)⟩, ?_⟩
intro b hb
rw [mem_singleton_iff.1 hb]
nth_rw 1 [← enum_typein r x]
rw [@enum_lt_enum _ r, Subtype.mk_lt_mk]
apply lt_succ
@[simp]
theorem typein_ordinal (o : Ordinal.{u}) :
@typein Ordinal (· < ·) _ o = Ordinal.lift.{u + 1} o := by
refine Quotient.inductionOn o ?_
rintro ⟨α, r, wo⟩; apply Quotient.sound
constructor; refine ((RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans (enum r).symm).symm
theorem mk_Iio_ordinal (o : Ordinal.{u}) :
#(Iio o) = Cardinal.lift.{u + 1} o.card := by
rw [lift_card, ← typein_ordinal]
rfl
/-! ### Normal ordinal functions -/
/-- A normal ordinal function is a strictly increasing function which is
order-continuous, i.e., the image `f o` of a limit ordinal `o` is the sup of `f a` for
`a < o`. -/
def IsNormal (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) : Prop :=
(∀ o, f o < f (succ o)) ∧ ∀ o, IsLimit o → ∀ a, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a
theorem IsNormal.limit_le {f} (H : IsNormal f) :
∀ {o}, IsLimit o → ∀ {a}, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a :=
@H.2
theorem IsNormal.limit_lt {f} (H : IsNormal f) {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} :
a < f o ↔ ∃ b < o, a < f b :=
not_iff_not.1 <| by simpa only [exists_prop, not_exists, not_and, not_lt] using H.2 _ h a
theorem IsNormal.strictMono {f} (H : IsNormal f) : StrictMono f := fun a b =>
limitRecOn b (Not.elim (not_lt_of_le <| Ordinal.zero_le _))
(fun _b IH h =>
(lt_or_eq_of_le (le_of_lt_succ h)).elim (fun h => (IH h).trans (H.1 _)) fun e => e ▸ H.1 _)
fun _b l _IH h => lt_of_lt_of_le (H.1 a) ((H.2 _ l _).1 le_rfl _ (l.succ_lt h))
theorem IsNormal.monotone {f} (H : IsNormal f) : Monotone f :=
H.strictMono.monotone
theorem isNormal_iff_strictMono_limit (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) :
IsNormal f ↔ StrictMono f ∧ ∀ o, IsLimit o → ∀ a, (∀ b < o, f b ≤ a) → f o ≤ a :=
⟨fun hf => ⟨hf.strictMono, fun a ha c => (hf.2 a ha c).2⟩, fun ⟨hs, hl⟩ =>
⟨fun a => hs (lt_succ a), fun a ha c =>
⟨fun hac _b hba => ((hs hba).trans_le hac).le, hl a ha c⟩⟩⟩
theorem IsNormal.lt_iff {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a < f b ↔ a < b :=
StrictMono.lt_iff_lt <| H.strictMono
theorem IsNormal.le_iff {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a ≤ f b ↔ a ≤ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 H.lt_iff
theorem IsNormal.inj {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a = f b ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, H.le_iff]
theorem IsNormal.id_le {f} (H : IsNormal f) : id ≤ f :=
H.strictMono.id_le
theorem IsNormal.le_apply {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a} : a ≤ f a :=
H.strictMono.le_apply
theorem IsNormal.le_iff_eq {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a} : f a ≤ a ↔ f a = a :=
H.le_apply.le_iff_eq
theorem IsNormal.le_set {f o} (H : IsNormal f) (p : Set Ordinal) (p0 : p.Nonempty) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, a ≤ o) : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f a ≤ o :=
⟨fun h _ pa => (H.le_iff.2 ((H₂ _).1 le_rfl _ pa)).trans h, fun h => by
induction b using limitRecOn with
| zero =>
obtain ⟨x, px⟩ := p0
have := Ordinal.le_zero.1 ((H₂ _).1 (Ordinal.zero_le _) _ px)
rw [this] at px
exact h _ px
| succ S _ =>
rcases not_forall₂.1 (mt (H₂ S).2 <| (lt_succ S).not_le) with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
exact (H.le_iff.2 <| succ_le_of_lt <| not_le.1 h₂).trans (h _ h₁)
| isLimit S L _ =>
refine (H.2 _ L _).2 fun a h' => ?_
rcases not_forall₂.1 (mt (H₂ a).2 h'.not_le) with ⟨b, h₁, h₂⟩
exact (H.le_iff.2 <| (not_le.1 h₂).le).trans (h _ h₁)⟩
theorem IsNormal.le_set' {f o} (H : IsNormal f) (p : Set α) (p0 : p.Nonempty) (g : α → Ordinal) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, g a ≤ o) : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f (g a) ≤ o := by
simpa [H₂] using H.le_set (g '' p) (p0.image g) b
theorem IsNormal.refl : IsNormal id :=
⟨lt_succ, fun _o l _a => Ordinal.limit_le l⟩
theorem IsNormal.trans {f g} (H₁ : IsNormal f) (H₂ : IsNormal g) : IsNormal (f ∘ g) :=
⟨fun _x => H₁.lt_iff.2 (H₂.1 _), fun o l _a =>
H₁.le_set' (· < o) ⟨0, l.pos⟩ g _ fun _c => H₂.2 _ l _⟩
theorem IsNormal.isLimit {f} (H : IsNormal f) {o} (ho : IsLimit o) : IsLimit (f o) := by
rw [isLimit_iff, isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_lt]
use (H.lt_iff.2 ho.pos).ne_bot
intro a ha
obtain ⟨b, hb, hab⟩ := (H.limit_lt ho).1 ha
rw [← succ_le_iff] at hab
apply hab.trans_lt
rwa [H.lt_iff]
theorem add_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit b) :
a + b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a + b' ≤ c :=
⟨fun h _ l => (add_le_add_left l.le _).trans h, fun H =>
le_of_not_lt <| by
-- Porting note: `induction` tactics are required because of the parser bug.
induction a using inductionOn with
| H α r =>
induction b using inductionOn with
| H β s =>
intro l
suffices ∀ x : β, Sum.Lex r s (Sum.inr x) (enum _ ⟨_, l⟩) by
-- Porting note: `revert` & `intro` is required because `cases'` doesn't replace
-- `enum _ _ l` in `this`.
revert this; rcases enum _ ⟨_, l⟩ with x | x <;> intro this
· cases this (enum s ⟨0, h.pos⟩)
· exact irrefl _ (this _)
intro x
rw [← typein_lt_typein (Sum.Lex r s), typein_enum]
have := H _ (h.succ_lt (typein_lt_type s x))
rw [add_succ, succ_le_iff] at this
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a => ?_) fun a b => ?_).ordinal_type_le.trans_lt this
· rcases a with ⟨a | b, h⟩
· exact Sum.inl a
· exact Sum.inr ⟨b, by cases h; assumption⟩
· rcases a with ⟨a | a, h₁⟩ <;> rcases b with ⟨b | b, h₂⟩ <;> cases h₁ <;> cases h₂ <;>
rintro ⟨⟩ <;> constructor <;> assumption⟩
theorem isNormal_add_right (a : Ordinal) : IsNormal (a + ·) :=
⟨fun b => (add_lt_add_iff_left a).2 (lt_succ b), fun _b l _c => add_le_of_limit l⟩
theorem isLimit_add (a) {b} : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a + b) :=
(isNormal_add_right a).isLimit
alias IsLimit.add := isLimit_add
/-! ### Subtraction on ordinals -/
/-- The set in the definition of subtraction is nonempty. -/
private theorem sub_nonempty {a b : Ordinal} : { o | a ≤ b + o }.Nonempty :=
⟨a, le_add_left _ _⟩
/-- `a - b` is the unique ordinal satisfying `b + (a - b) = a` when `b ≤ a`. -/
instance sub : Sub Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => sInf { o | a ≤ b + o }⟩
theorem le_add_sub (a b : Ordinal) : a ≤ b + (a - b) :=
csInf_mem sub_nonempty
theorem sub_le {a b c : Ordinal} : a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b + c :=
⟨fun h => (le_add_sub a b).trans (add_le_add_left h _), fun h => csInf_le' h⟩
theorem lt_sub {a b c : Ordinal} : a < b - c ↔ c + a < b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le sub_le
theorem add_sub_cancel (a b : Ordinal) : a + b - a = b :=
le_antisymm (sub_le.2 <| le_rfl) ((add_le_add_iff_left a).1 <| le_add_sub _ _)
theorem sub_eq_of_add_eq {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a + b = c) : c - a = b :=
h ▸ add_sub_cancel _ _
theorem sub_le_self (a b : Ordinal) : a - b ≤ a :=
sub_le.2 <| le_add_left _ _
protected theorem add_sub_cancel_of_le {a b : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : b + (a - b) = a :=
(le_add_sub a b).antisymm'
(by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit (a - b) with (e | ⟨c, e⟩ | l)
· simp only [e, add_zero, h]
· rw [e, add_succ, succ_le_iff, ← lt_sub, e]
exact lt_succ c
· exact (add_le_of_limit l).2 fun c l => (lt_sub.1 l).le)
theorem le_sub_of_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : c ≤ a - b ↔ b + c ≤ a := by
rw [← add_le_add_iff_left b, Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h]
theorem sub_lt_of_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : a - b < c ↔ a < b + c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (le_sub_of_le h)
instance existsAddOfLE : ExistsAddOfLE Ordinal :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, (Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h).symm⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem sub_zero (a : Ordinal) : a - 0 = a := by simpa only [zero_add] using add_sub_cancel 0 a
@[simp]
theorem zero_sub (a : Ordinal) : 0 - a = 0 := by rw [← Ordinal.le_zero]; apply sub_le_self
@[simp]
theorem sub_self (a : Ordinal) : a - a = 0 := by simpa only [add_zero] using add_sub_cancel a 0
protected theorem sub_eq_zero_iff_le {a b : Ordinal} : a - b = 0 ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [h, add_zero] using le_add_sub a b, fun h => by
rwa [← Ordinal.le_zero, sub_le, add_zero]⟩
protected theorem sub_ne_zero_iff_lt {a b : Ordinal} : a - b ≠ 0 ↔ b < a := by
simpa using Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.not
theorem sub_sub (a b c : Ordinal) : a - b - c = a - (b + c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by rw [sub_le, sub_le, sub_le, add_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem add_sub_add_cancel (a b c : Ordinal) : a + b - (a + c) = b - c := by
rw [← sub_sub, add_sub_cancel]
theorem le_sub_of_add_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b + c ≤ a) : c ≤ a - b := by
rw [← add_le_add_iff_left b]
exact h.trans (le_add_sub a b)
theorem sub_lt_of_lt_add {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a < b + c) (hc : 0 < c) : a - b < c := by
obtain hab | hba := lt_or_le a b
· rwa [Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 hab.le]
· rwa [sub_lt_of_le hba]
theorem lt_add_iff {a b c : Ordinal} (hc : c ≠ 0) : a < b + c ↔ ∃ d < c, a ≤ b + d := by
use fun h ↦ ⟨_, sub_lt_of_lt_add h hc.bot_lt, le_add_sub a b⟩
rintro ⟨d, hd, ha⟩
exact ha.trans_lt (add_lt_add_left hd b)
theorem add_le_iff {a b c : Ordinal} (hb : b ≠ 0) : a + b ≤ c ↔ ∀ d < b, a + d < c := by
simpa using (lt_add_iff hb).not
@[deprecated add_le_iff (since := "2024-12-08")]
theorem add_le_of_forall_add_lt {a b c : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) (h : ∀ d < b, a + d < c) :
a + b ≤ c :=
(add_le_iff hb.ne').2 h
theorem isLimit_sub {a b} (ha : IsLimit a) (h : b < a) : IsLimit (a - b) := by
rw [isLimit_iff, Ordinal.sub_ne_zero_iff_lt, isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_lt]
refine ⟨h, fun c hc ↦ ?_⟩
rw [lt_sub] at hc ⊢
rw [add_succ]
exact ha.succ_lt hc
/-! ### Multiplication of ordinals -/
/-- The multiplication of ordinals `o₁` and `o₂` is the (well founded) lexicographic order on
`o₂ × o₁`. -/
instance monoid : Monoid Ordinal.{u} where
mul a b :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ a b
(fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ => ⟦⟨β × α, Prod.Lex s r, inferInstance⟩⟧ :
WellOrder → WellOrder → Ordinal)
fun ⟨_, _, _⟩ _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ => Quot.sound ⟨RelIso.prodLexCongr g f⟩
one := 1
mul_assoc a b c :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Eq.symm <|
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨prodAssoc _ _ _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨⟨a₁, a₂⟩, a₃⟩
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₁, b₂⟩, b₃⟩
simp [Prod.lex_def, and_or_left, or_assoc, and_assoc]⟩⟩
mul_one a :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨punitProd _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, a⟩; rcases b with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, b⟩
simp only [Prod.lex_def, EmptyRelation, false_or]
simp only [eq_self_iff_true, true_and]
rfl⟩⟩
one_mul a :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨prodPUnit _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨a, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩; rcases b with ⟨b, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩
simp only [Prod.lex_def, EmptyRelation, and_false, or_false]
rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem type_prod_lex {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type (Prod.Lex s r) = type r * type s :=
rfl
private theorem mul_eq_zero' {a b : Ordinal} : a * b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
inductionOn a fun α _ _ =>
inductionOn b fun β _ _ => by
simp_rw [← type_prod_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty]
rw [or_comm]
exact isEmpty_prod
instance monoidWithZero : MonoidWithZero Ordinal :=
{ Ordinal.monoid with
zero := 0
mul_zero := fun _a => mul_eq_zero'.2 <| Or.inr rfl
zero_mul := fun _a => mul_eq_zero'.2 <| Or.inl rfl }
instance noZeroDivisors : NoZeroDivisors Ordinal :=
⟨fun {_ _} => mul_eq_zero'.1⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_mul (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a * b) = lift.{u} a * lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.prodLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)
(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem card_mul (a b) : card (a * b) = card a * card b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨α, _r, _⟩ ⟨β, _s, _⟩ => mul_comm #β #α
instance leftDistribClass : LeftDistribClass Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a b c =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨sumProdDistrib _ _ _, by
rintro ⟨a₁ | a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨b₁ | b₁, b₂⟩ <;>
simp only [Prod.lex_def, Sum.lex_inl_inl, Sum.Lex.sep, Sum.lex_inr_inl, Sum.lex_inr_inr,
sumProdDistrib_apply_left, sumProdDistrib_apply_right, reduceCtorEq] <;>
-- Porting note: `Sum.inr.inj_iff` is required.
simp only [Sum.inl.inj_iff, Sum.inr.inj_iff, true_or, false_and, false_or]⟩⟩⟩
theorem mul_succ (a b : Ordinal) : a * succ b = a * b + a :=
mul_add_one a b
instance mulLeftMono : MulLeftMono Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun c a b =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ => by
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a : α × γ => (f a.1, a.2)) fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
obtain ⟨-, -, h'⟩ | ⟨-, h'⟩ := h
· exact Prod.Lex.left _ _ (f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2 h')
· exact Prod.Lex.right _ h'⟩
instance mulRightMono : MulRightMono Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun c a b =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ => by
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a : γ × α => (a.1, f a.2)) fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
obtain ⟨-, -, h'⟩ | ⟨-, h'⟩ := h
· exact Prod.Lex.left _ _ h'
· exact Prod.Lex.right _ (f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2 h')⟩
theorem le_mul_left (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ a * b := by
convert mul_le_mul_left' (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb) a
rw [mul_one a]
theorem le_mul_right (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ b * a := by
convert mul_le_mul_right' (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb) a
rw [one_mul a]
private theorem mul_le_of_limit_aux {α β r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] {c}
(h : IsLimit (type s)) (H : ∀ b' < type s, type r * b' ≤ c) (l : c < type r * type s) :
False := by
suffices ∀ a b, Prod.Lex s r (b, a) (enum _ ⟨_, l⟩) by
obtain ⟨b, a⟩ := enum _ ⟨_, l⟩
exact irrefl _ (this _ _)
intro a b
rw [← typein_lt_typein (Prod.Lex s r), typein_enum]
have := H _ (h.succ_lt (typein_lt_type s b))
rw [mul_succ] at this
have := ((add_lt_add_iff_left _).2 (typein_lt_type _ a)).trans_le this
refine (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a => ?_) fun a b => ?_).ordinal_type_le.trans_lt this
· rcases a with ⟨⟨b', a'⟩, h⟩
by_cases e : b = b'
· refine Sum.inr ⟨a', ?_⟩
subst e
obtain ⟨-, -, h⟩ | ⟨-, h⟩ := h
· exact (irrefl _ h).elim
· exact h
· refine Sum.inl (⟨b', ?_⟩, a')
obtain ⟨-, -, h⟩ | ⟨e, h⟩ := h
· exact h
· exact (e rfl).elim
· rcases a with ⟨⟨b₁, a₁⟩, h₁⟩
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₂, a₂⟩, h₂⟩
intro h
by_cases e₁ : b = b₁ <;> by_cases e₂ : b = b₂
· substs b₁ b₂
simpa only [subrel_val, Prod.lex_def, @irrefl _ s _ b, true_and, false_or,
eq_self_iff_true, dif_pos, Sum.lex_inr_inr] using h
· subst b₁
simp only [subrel_val, Prod.lex_def, e₂, Prod.lex_def, dif_pos, subrel_val, eq_self_iff_true,
or_false, dif_neg, not_false_iff, Sum.lex_inr_inl, false_and] at h ⊢
obtain ⟨-, -, h₂_h⟩ | e₂ := h₂ <;> [exact asymm h h₂_h; exact e₂ rfl]
· simp [e₂, dif_neg e₁, show b₂ ≠ b₁ from e₂ ▸ e₁]
· simpa only [dif_neg e₁, dif_neg e₂, Prod.lex_def, subrel_val, Subtype.mk_eq_mk,
Sum.lex_inl_inl] using h
theorem mul_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit b) : a * b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a * b' ≤ c :=
⟨fun h _ l => (mul_le_mul_left' l.le _).trans h, fun H =>
-- Porting note: `induction` tactics are required because of the parser bug.
le_of_not_lt <| by
induction a using inductionOn with
| H α r =>
induction b using inductionOn with
| H β s =>
exact mul_le_of_limit_aux h H⟩
theorem isNormal_mul_right {a : Ordinal} (h : 0 < a) : IsNormal (a * ·) :=
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129): additional beta reduction needed
⟨fun b => by
beta_reduce
rw [mul_succ]
simpa only [add_zero] using (add_lt_add_iff_left (a * b)).2 h,
fun _ l _ => mul_le_of_limit l⟩
theorem lt_mul_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit c) : a < b * c ↔ ∃ c' < c, a < b * c' := by
-- Porting note: `bex_def` is required.
simpa only [not_forall₂, not_le, bex_def] using not_congr (@mul_le_of_limit b c a h)
theorem mul_lt_mul_iff_left {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b < a * c ↔ b < c :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).lt_iff
theorem mul_le_mul_iff_left {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b ≤ a * c ↔ b ≤ c :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).le_iff
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a < b) (c0 : 0 < c) : c * a < c * b :=
(mul_lt_mul_iff_left c0).2 h
theorem mul_pos {a b : Ordinal} (h₁ : 0 < a) (h₂ : 0 < b) : 0 < a * b := by
simpa only [mul_zero] using mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h₂ h₁
theorem mul_ne_zero {a b : Ordinal} : a ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 → a * b ≠ 0 := by
simpa only [Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero] using mul_pos
theorem le_of_mul_le_mul_left {a b c : Ordinal} (h : c * a ≤ c * b) (h0 : 0 < c) : a ≤ b :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt (fun h' => mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h' h0) h
theorem mul_right_inj {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).inj
theorem isLimit_mul {a b : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a * b) :=
(isNormal_mul_right a0).isLimit
theorem isLimit_mul_left {a b : Ordinal} (l : IsLimit a) (b0 : 0 < b) : IsLimit (a * b) := by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit b with (rfl | ⟨b, rfl⟩ | lb)
· exact b0.false.elim
· rw [mul_succ]
exact isLimit_add _ l
· exact isLimit_mul l.pos lb
theorem smul_eq_mul : ∀ (n : ℕ) (a : Ordinal), n • a = a * n
| 0, a => by rw [zero_nsmul, Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero]
| n + 1, a => by rw [succ_nsmul, Nat.cast_add, mul_add, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, smul_eq_mul n]
private theorem add_mul_limit_aux {a b c : Ordinal} (ba : b + a = a) (l : IsLimit c)
(IH : ∀ c' < c, (a + b) * succ c' = a * succ c' + b) : (a + b) * c = a * c :=
le_antisymm
((mul_le_of_limit l).2 fun c' h => by
apply (mul_le_mul_left' (le_succ c') _).trans
rw [IH _ h]
apply (add_le_add_left _ _).trans
· rw [← mul_succ]
exact mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_of_lt <| l.succ_lt h) _
· rw [← ba]
exact le_add_right _ _)
(mul_le_mul_right' (le_add_right _ _) _)
theorem add_mul_succ {a b : Ordinal} (c) (ba : b + a = a) : (a + b) * succ c = a * succ c + b := by
induction c using limitRecOn with
| zero => simp only [succ_zero, mul_one]
| succ c IH =>
rw [mul_succ, IH, ← add_assoc, add_assoc _ b, ba, ← mul_succ]
| isLimit c l IH =>
rw [mul_succ, add_mul_limit_aux ba l IH, mul_succ, add_assoc]
theorem add_mul_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (ba : b + a = a) (l : IsLimit c) : (a + b) * c = a * c :=
add_mul_limit_aux ba l fun c' _ => add_mul_succ c' ba
/-! ### Division on ordinals -/
/-- The set in the definition of division is nonempty. -/
private theorem div_nonempty {a b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : { o | a < b * succ o }.Nonempty :=
⟨a, (succ_le_iff (a := a) (b := b * succ a)).1 <| by
simpa only [succ_zero, one_mul] using
mul_le_mul_right' (succ_le_of_lt (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h)) (succ a)⟩
/-- `a / b` is the unique ordinal `o` satisfying `a = b * o + o'` with `o' < b`. -/
instance div : Div Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => if b = 0 then 0 else sInf { o | a < b * succ o }⟩
@[simp]
theorem div_zero (a : Ordinal) : a / 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
private theorem div_def (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a / b = sInf { o | a < b * succ o } :=
dif_neg h
theorem lt_mul_succ_div (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * succ (a / b) := by
rw [div_def a h]; exact csInf_mem (div_nonempty h)
theorem lt_mul_div_add (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * (a / b) + b := by
simpa only [mul_succ] using lt_mul_succ_div a h
theorem div_le {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b ≤ c ↔ a < b * succ c :=
⟨fun h => (lt_mul_succ_div a b0).trans_le (mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_succ_iff.2 h) _), fun h => by
rw [div_def a b0]; exact csInf_le' h⟩
theorem lt_div {a b c : Ordinal} (h : c ≠ 0) : a < b / c ↔ c * succ a ≤ b := by
rw [← not_le, div_le h, not_lt]
theorem div_pos {b c : Ordinal} (h : c ≠ 0) : 0 < b / c ↔ c ≤ b := by simp [lt_div h]
theorem le_div {a b c : Ordinal} (c0 : c ≠ 0) : a ≤ b / c ↔ c * a ≤ b := by
induction a using limitRecOn with
| zero => simp only [mul_zero, Ordinal.zero_le]
| succ _ _ => rw [succ_le_iff, lt_div c0]
| isLimit _ h₁ h₂ =>
revert h₁ h₂
simp +contextual only [mul_le_of_limit, limit_le, forall_true_iff]
theorem div_lt {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b < c ↔ a < b * c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| le_div b0
theorem div_le_of_le_mul {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a ≤ b * c) : a / b ≤ c :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, div_zero, Ordinal.zero_le]
else
(div_le b0).2 <| h.trans_lt <| mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left (lt_succ c) (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 b0)
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_div {a b c : Ordinal} : a < b / c → c * a < b :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le div_le_of_le_mul
@[simp]
theorem zero_div (a : Ordinal) : 0 / a = 0 :=
Ordinal.le_zero.1 <| div_le_of_le_mul <| Ordinal.zero_le _
theorem mul_div_le (a b : Ordinal) : b * (a / b) ≤ a :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, zero_mul, Ordinal.zero_le] else (le_div b0).1 le_rfl
theorem div_le_left {a b : Ordinal} (h : a ≤ b) (c : Ordinal) : a / c ≤ b / c := by
obtain rfl | hc := eq_or_ne c 0
· rw [div_zero, div_zero]
· rw [le_div hc]
exact (mul_div_le a c).trans h
theorem mul_add_div (a) {b : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (c) : (b * a + c) / b = a + c / b := by
apply le_antisymm
· apply (div_le b0).2
rw [mul_succ, mul_add, add_assoc, add_lt_add_iff_left]
apply lt_mul_div_add _ b0
· rw [le_div b0, mul_add, add_le_add_iff_left]
apply mul_div_le
theorem div_eq_zero_of_lt {a b : Ordinal} (h : a < b) : a / b = 0 := by
rw [← Ordinal.le_zero, div_le <| Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 <| (Ordinal.zero_le _).trans_lt h]
simpa only [succ_zero, mul_one] using h
@[simp]
theorem mul_div_cancel (a) {b : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : b * a / b = a := by
simpa only [add_zero, zero_div] using mul_add_div a b0 0
theorem mul_add_div_mul {a c : Ordinal} (hc : c < a) (b d : Ordinal) :
(a * b + c) / (a * d) = b / d := by
have ha : a ≠ 0 := ((Ordinal.zero_le c).trans_lt hc).ne'
obtain rfl | hd := eq_or_ne d 0
· rw [mul_zero, div_zero, div_zero]
· have H := mul_ne_zero ha hd
apply le_antisymm
· rw [← lt_succ_iff, div_lt H, mul_assoc]
· apply (add_lt_add_left hc _).trans_le
rw [← mul_succ]
apply mul_le_mul_left'
rw [succ_le_iff]
exact lt_mul_succ_div b hd
· rw [le_div H, mul_assoc]
exact (mul_le_mul_left' (mul_div_le b d) a).trans (le_add_right _ c)
theorem mul_div_mul_cancel {a : Ordinal} (ha : a ≠ 0) (b c) : a * b / (a * c) = b / c := by
convert mul_add_div_mul (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 ha) b c using 1
rw [add_zero]
@[simp]
theorem div_one (a : Ordinal) : a / 1 = a := by
simpa only [one_mul] using mul_div_cancel a Ordinal.one_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem div_self {a : Ordinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : a / a = 1 := by
simpa only [mul_one] using mul_div_cancel 1 h
theorem mul_sub (a b c : Ordinal) : a * (b - c) = a * b - a * c :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by simp only [a0, zero_mul, sub_self]
else
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by rw [sub_le, ← le_div a0, sub_le, ← le_div a0, mul_add_div _ a0]
theorem isLimit_add_iff {a b} : IsLimit (a + b) ↔ IsLimit b ∨ b = 0 ∧ IsLimit a := by
constructor <;> intro h
· by_cases h' : b = 0
· rw [h', add_zero] at h
right
exact ⟨h', h⟩
left
rw [← add_sub_cancel a b]
apply isLimit_sub h
suffices a + 0 < a + b by simpa only [add_zero] using this
rwa [add_lt_add_iff_left, Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero]
rcases h with (h | ⟨rfl, h⟩)
· exact isLimit_add a h
· simpa only [add_zero]
theorem dvd_add_iff : ∀ {a b c : Ordinal}, a ∣ b → (a ∣ b + c ↔ a ∣ c)
| a, _, c, ⟨b, rfl⟩ =>
⟨fun ⟨d, e⟩ => ⟨d - b, by rw [mul_sub, ← e, add_sub_cancel]⟩, fun ⟨d, e⟩ => by
rw [e, ← mul_add]
apply dvd_mul_right⟩
theorem div_mul_cancel : ∀ {a b : Ordinal}, a ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a * (b / a) = b
| a, _, a0, ⟨b, rfl⟩ => by rw [mul_div_cancel _ a0]
theorem le_of_dvd : ∀ {a b : Ordinal}, b ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a ≤ b
-- Porting note: `⟨b, rfl⟩ => by` → `⟨b, e⟩ => by subst e`
| a, _, b0, ⟨b, e⟩ => by
subst e
-- Porting note: `Ne` is required.
simpa only [mul_one] using
mul_le_mul_left'
(one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 fun h : b = 0 => by
simp only [h, mul_zero, Ne, not_true_eq_false] at b0) a
theorem dvd_antisymm {a b : Ordinal} (h₁ : a ∣ b) (h₂ : b ∣ a) : a = b :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by subst a; exact (eq_zero_of_zero_dvd h₁).symm
else
if b0 : b = 0 then by subst b; exact eq_zero_of_zero_dvd h₂
else (le_of_dvd b0 h₁).antisymm (le_of_dvd a0 h₂)
instance isAntisymm : IsAntisymm Ordinal (· ∣ ·) :=
⟨@dvd_antisymm⟩
/-- `a % b` is the unique ordinal `o'` satisfying
`a = b * o + o'` with `o' < b`. -/
instance mod : Mod Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => a - b * (a / b)⟩
theorem mod_def (a b : Ordinal) : a % b = a - b * (a / b) :=
rfl
theorem mod_le (a b : Ordinal) : a % b ≤ a :=
sub_le_self a _
@[simp]
theorem mod_zero (a : Ordinal) : a % 0 = a := by simp only [mod_def, div_zero, zero_mul, sub_zero]
theorem mod_eq_of_lt {a b : Ordinal} (h : a < b) : a % b = a := by
simp only [mod_def, div_eq_zero_of_lt h, mul_zero, sub_zero]
@[simp]
theorem zero_mod (b : Ordinal) : 0 % b = 0 := by simp only [mod_def, zero_div, mul_zero, sub_self]
theorem div_add_mod (a b : Ordinal) : b * (a / b) + a % b = a :=
Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le <| mul_div_le _ _
theorem mod_lt (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a % b < b :=
(add_lt_add_iff_left (b * (a / b))).1 <| by rw [div_add_mod]; exact lt_mul_div_add a h
@[simp]
theorem mod_self (a : Ordinal) : a % a = 0 :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by simp only [a0, zero_mod]
else by simp only [mod_def, div_self a0, mul_one, sub_self]
@[simp]
theorem mod_one (a : Ordinal) : a % 1 = 0 := by simp only [mod_def, div_one, one_mul, sub_self]
theorem dvd_of_mod_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (H : a % b = 0) : b ∣ a :=
⟨a / b, by simpa [H] using (div_add_mod a b).symm⟩
theorem mod_eq_zero_of_dvd {a b : Ordinal} (H : b ∣ a) : a % b = 0 := by
rcases H with ⟨c, rfl⟩
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb)
· simp
· simp [mod_def, hb]
theorem dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} : b ∣ a ↔ a % b = 0 :=
⟨mod_eq_zero_of_dvd, dvd_of_mod_eq_zero⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_add_mod_self (x y z : Ordinal) : (x * y + z) % x = z % x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with rfl | hx
· simp
· rwa [mod_def, mul_add_div, mul_add, ← sub_sub, add_sub_cancel, mod_def]
@[simp]
theorem mul_mod (x y : Ordinal) : x * y % x = 0 := by
simpa using mul_add_mod_self x y 0
theorem mul_add_mod_mul {w x : Ordinal} (hw : w < x) (y z : Ordinal) :
(x * y + w) % (x * z) = x * (y % z) + w := by
rw [mod_def, mul_add_div_mul hw]
apply sub_eq_of_add_eq
rw [← add_assoc, mul_assoc, ← mul_add, div_add_mod]
theorem mul_mod_mul (x y z : Ordinal) : (x * y) % (x * z) = x * (y % z) := by
obtain rfl | hx := Ordinal.eq_zero_or_pos x
· simp
· convert mul_add_mod_mul hx y z using 1 <;>
rw [add_zero]
theorem mod_mod_of_dvd (a : Ordinal) {b c : Ordinal} (h : c ∣ b) : a % b % c = a % c := by
nth_rw 2 [← div_add_mod a b]
rcases h with ⟨d, rfl⟩
rw [mul_assoc, mul_add_mod_self]
@[simp]
theorem mod_mod (a b : Ordinal) : a % b % b = a % b :=
mod_mod_of_dvd a dvd_rfl
/-! ### Casting naturals into ordinals, compatibility with operations -/
instance instCharZero : CharZero Ordinal := by
refine ⟨fun a b h ↦ ?_⟩
rwa [← Cardinal.ord_nat, ← Cardinal.ord_nat, Cardinal.ord_inj, Nat.cast_inj] at h
@[simp]
theorem one_add_natCast (m : ℕ) : 1 + (m : Ordinal) = succ m := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, add_comm]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem one_add_ofNat (m : ℕ) [m.AtLeastTwo] :
1 + (ofNat(m) : Ordinal) = Order.succ (OfNat.ofNat m : Ordinal) :=
one_add_natCast m
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mul (m : ℕ) : ∀ n : ℕ, ((m * n : ℕ) : Ordinal) = m * n
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by rw [Nat.mul_succ, Nat.cast_add, natCast_mul m n, Nat.cast_succ, mul_add_one]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_sub (m n : ℕ) : ((m - n : ℕ) : Ordinal) = m - n := by
rcases le_total m n with h | h
· rw [tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 h, Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 (Nat.cast_le.2 h), Nat.cast_zero]
· rw [← add_left_cancel_iff (a := ↑n), ← Nat.cast_add, add_tsub_cancel_of_le h,
Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le (Nat.cast_le.2 h)]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_div (m n : ℕ) : ((m / n : ℕ) : Ordinal) = m / n := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
· have hn' : (n : Ordinal) ≠ 0 := Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 hn
apply le_antisymm
· rw [le_div hn', ← natCast_mul, Nat.cast_le, mul_comm]
apply Nat.div_mul_le_self
· rw [div_le hn', ← add_one_eq_succ, ← Nat.cast_succ, ← natCast_mul, Nat.cast_lt, mul_comm,
← Nat.div_lt_iff_lt_mul (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn)]
apply Nat.lt_succ_self
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mod (m n : ℕ) : ((m % n : ℕ) : Ordinal) = m % n := by
rw [← add_left_cancel_iff, div_add_mod, ← natCast_div, ← natCast_mul, ← Nat.cast_add,
Nat.div_add_mod]
@[simp]
theorem lift_natCast : ∀ n : ℕ, lift.{u, v} n = n
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by simp [lift_natCast n]
@[simp]
theorem lift_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
lift.{u, v} ofNat(n) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
lift_natCast n
theorem lt_omega0 {o : Ordinal} : o < ω ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, o = n := by
simp_rw [← Cardinal.ord_aleph0, Cardinal.lt_ord, lt_aleph0, card_eq_nat]
theorem nat_lt_omega0 (n : ℕ) : ↑n < ω :=
lt_omega0.2 ⟨_, rfl⟩
theorem eq_nat_or_omega0_le (o : Ordinal) : (∃ n : ℕ, o = n) ∨ ω ≤ o := by
obtain ho | ho := lt_or_le o ω
· exact Or.inl <| lt_omega0.1 ho
· exact Or.inr ho
theorem omega0_pos : 0 < ω :=
nat_lt_omega0 0
theorem omega0_ne_zero : ω ≠ 0 :=
omega0_pos.ne'
theorem one_lt_omega0 : 1 < ω := by simpa only [Nat.cast_one] using nat_lt_omega0 1
theorem isLimit_omega0 : IsLimit ω := by
rw [isLimit_iff, isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_lt]
refine ⟨omega0_ne_zero, fun o h => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_omega0.1 h
exact nat_lt_omega0 (n + 1)
theorem omega0_le {o : Ordinal} : ω ≤ o ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ↑n ≤ o :=
⟨fun h n => (nat_lt_omega0 _).le.trans h, fun H =>
le_of_forall_lt fun a h => by
let ⟨n, e⟩ := lt_omega0.1 h
rw [e, ← succ_le_iff]; exact H (n + 1)⟩
theorem nat_lt_limit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : ∀ n : ℕ, ↑n < o
| 0 => h.pos
| n + 1 => h.succ_lt (nat_lt_limit h n)
theorem omega0_le_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : ω ≤ o :=
omega0_le.2 fun n => le_of_lt <| nat_lt_limit h n
theorem natCast_add_omega0 (n : ℕ) : n + ω = ω := by
refine le_antisymm (le_of_forall_lt fun a ha ↦ ?_) (le_add_left _ _)
obtain ⟨b, hb', hb⟩ := (lt_add_iff omega0_ne_zero).1 ha
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ := lt_omega0.1 hb'
apply hb.trans_lt
exact_mod_cast nat_lt_omega0 (n + m)
theorem one_add_omega0 : 1 + ω = ω :=
mod_cast natCast_add_omega0 1
theorem add_omega0 {a : Ordinal} (h : a < ω) : a + ω = ω := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_omega0.1 h
exact natCast_add_omega0 n
@[simp]
theorem natCast_add_of_omega0_le {o} (h : ω ≤ o) (n : ℕ) : n + o = o := by
rw [← Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h, ← add_assoc, natCast_add_omega0]
@[simp]
theorem one_add_of_omega0_le {o} (h : ω ≤ o) : 1 + o = o :=
mod_cast natCast_add_of_omega0_le h 1
open Ordinal
theorem isLimit_iff_omega0_dvd {a : Ordinal} : IsLimit a ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ ω ∣ a := by
refine ⟨fun l => ⟨l.ne_zero, ⟨a / ω, le_antisymm ?_ (mul_div_le _ _)⟩⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
· refine (limit_le l).2 fun x hx => le_of_lt ?_
rw [← div_lt omega0_ne_zero, ← succ_le_iff, le_div omega0_ne_zero, mul_succ,
add_le_of_limit isLimit_omega0]
intro b hb
rcases lt_omega0.1 hb with ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact
(add_le_add_right (mul_div_le _ _) _).trans
(lt_sub.1 <| nat_lt_limit (isLimit_sub l hx) _).le
· rcases h with ⟨a0, b, rfl⟩
refine isLimit_mul_left isLimit_omega0 (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 <| mt ?_ a0)
intro e
simp only [e, mul_zero]
@[simp]
theorem natCast_mod_omega0 (n : ℕ) : n % ω = n :=
mod_eq_of_lt (nat_lt_omega0 n)
end Ordinal
namespace Cardinal
open Ordinal
@[simp]
theorem add_one_of_aleph0_le {c} (h : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : c + 1 = c := by
rw [add_comm, ← card_ord c, ← card_one, ← card_add, one_add_of_omega0_le]
rwa [← ord_aleph0, ord_le_ord]
theorem isLimit_ord {c} (co : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : (ord c).IsLimit := by
rw [isLimit_iff, isSuccPrelimit_iff_succ_lt]
refine ⟨fun h => aleph0_ne_zero ?_, fun a => lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h => ?_⟩
· rw [← Ordinal.le_zero, ord_le] at h
simpa only [card_zero, nonpos_iff_eq_zero] using co.trans h
· rw [ord_le] at h ⊢
rwa [← @add_one_of_aleph0_le (card a), ← card_succ]
rw [← ord_le, ← le_succ_of_isLimit, ord_le]
· exact co.trans h
· rw [ord_aleph0]
exact Ordinal.isLimit_omega0
theorem noMaxOrder {c} (h : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : NoMaxOrder c.ord.toType :=
toType_noMax_of_succ_lt fun _ ↦ (isLimit_ord h).succ_lt
end Cardinal
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean | 2,524 | 2,535 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Guy Leroy. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sangwoo Jo (aka Jason), Guy Leroy, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Semiconj
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Units
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Operations
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Int.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Basic
/-!
# Extended GCD and divisibility over ℤ
## Main definitions
* Given `x y : ℕ`, `xgcd x y` computes the pair of integers `(a, b)` such that
`gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. `gcdA x y` and `gcdB x y` are defined to be `a` and `b`,
respectively.
## Main statements
* `gcd_eq_gcd_ab`: Bézout's lemma, given `x y : ℕ`, `gcd x y = x * gcdA x y + y * gcdB x y`.
## Tags
Bézout's lemma, Bezout's lemma
-/
/-! ### Extended Euclidean algorithm -/
namespace Nat
/-- Helper function for the extended GCD algorithm (`Nat.xgcd`). -/
def xgcdAux : ℕ → ℤ → ℤ → ℕ → ℤ → ℤ → ℕ × ℤ × ℤ
| 0, _, _, r', s', t' => (r', s', t')
| succ k, s, t, r', s', t' =>
let q := r' / succ k
xgcdAux (r' % succ k) (s' - q * s) (t' - q * t) (succ k) s t
termination_by k => k
decreasing_by exact mod_lt _ <| (succ_pos _).gt
@[simp]
theorem xgcd_zero_left {s t r' s' t'} : xgcdAux 0 s t r' s' t' = (r', s', t') := by simp [xgcdAux]
theorem xgcdAux_rec {r s t r' s' t'} (h : 0 < r) :
xgcdAux r s t r' s' t' = xgcdAux (r' % r) (s' - r' / r * s) (t' - r' / r * t) r s t := by
obtain ⟨r, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h.ne'
simp [xgcdAux]
/-- Use the extended GCD algorithm to generate the `a` and `b` values
satisfying `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. -/
def xgcd (x y : ℕ) : ℤ × ℤ :=
(xgcdAux x 1 0 y 0 1).2
/-- The extended GCD `a` value in the equation `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. -/
def gcdA (x y : ℕ) : ℤ :=
(xgcd x y).1
/-- The extended GCD `b` value in the equation `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. -/
def gcdB (x y : ℕ) : ℤ :=
(xgcd x y).2
@[simp]
theorem gcdA_zero_left {s : ℕ} : gcdA 0 s = 0 := by
unfold gcdA
rw [xgcd, xgcd_zero_left]
@[simp]
theorem gcdB_zero_left {s : ℕ} : gcdB 0 s = 1 := by
unfold gcdB
rw [xgcd, xgcd_zero_left]
@[simp]
theorem gcdA_zero_right {s : ℕ} (h : s ≠ 0) : gcdA s 0 = 1 := by
unfold gcdA xgcd
obtain ⟨s, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h
rw [xgcdAux]
simp
@[simp]
theorem gcdB_zero_right {s : ℕ} (h : s ≠ 0) : gcdB s 0 = 0 := by
unfold gcdB xgcd
obtain ⟨s, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h
rw [xgcdAux]
simp
@[simp]
theorem xgcdAux_fst (x y) : ∀ s t s' t', (xgcdAux x s t y s' t').1 = gcd x y :=
gcd.induction x y (by simp) fun x y h IH s t s' t' => by
simp only [h, xgcdAux_rec, IH]
rw [← gcd_rec]
theorem xgcdAux_val (x y) : xgcdAux x 1 0 y 0 1 = (gcd x y, xgcd x y) := by
rw [xgcd, ← xgcdAux_fst x y 1 0 0 1]
theorem xgcd_val (x y) : xgcd x y = (gcdA x y, gcdB x y) := by
unfold gcdA gcdB; cases xgcd x y; rfl
section
variable (x y : ℕ)
private def P : ℕ × ℤ × ℤ → Prop
| (r, s, t) => (r : ℤ) = x * s + y * t
theorem xgcdAux_P {r r'} :
∀ {s t s' t'}, P x y (r, s, t) → P x y (r', s', t') → P x y (xgcdAux r s t r' s' t') := by
induction r, r' using gcd.induction with
| H0 => simp
| H1 a b h IH =>
intro s t s' t' p p'
rw [xgcdAux_rec h]; refine IH ?_ p; dsimp [P] at *
rw [Int.emod_def]; generalize (b / a : ℤ) = k
rw [p, p', Int.mul_sub, sub_add_eq_add_sub, Int.mul_sub, Int.add_mul, mul_comm k t,
mul_comm k s, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, add_comm (x * s * k), ← add_sub_assoc, sub_sub]
/-- **Bézout's lemma**: given `x y : ℕ`, `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`, where `a = gcd_a x y` and
`b = gcd_b x y` are computed by the extended Euclidean algorithm.
-/
theorem gcd_eq_gcd_ab : (gcd x y : ℤ) = x * gcdA x y + y * gcdB x y := by
have := @xgcdAux_P x y x y 1 0 0 1 (by simp [P]) (by simp [P])
rwa [xgcdAux_val, xgcd_val] at this
end
theorem exists_mul_emod_eq_gcd {k n : ℕ} (hk : gcd n k < k) : ∃ m, n * m % k = gcd n k := by
have hk' := Int.ofNat_ne_zero.2 (ne_of_gt (lt_of_le_of_lt (zero_le (gcd n k)) hk))
have key := congr_arg (fun (m : ℤ) => (m % k).toNat) (gcd_eq_gcd_ab n k)
simp only at key
rw [Int.add_mul_emod_self_left, ← Int.natCast_mod, Int.toNat_natCast, mod_eq_of_lt hk] at key
refine ⟨(n.gcdA k % k).toNat, Eq.trans (Int.ofNat.inj ?_) key.symm⟩
rw [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, Int.natCast_mod, Int.natCast_mul,
Int.toNat_of_nonneg (Int.emod_nonneg _ hk'), Int.ofNat_eq_coe,
Int.toNat_of_nonneg (Int.emod_nonneg _ hk'), Int.mul_emod, Int.emod_emod, ← Int.mul_emod]
theorem exists_mul_emod_eq_one_of_coprime {k n : ℕ} (hkn : Coprime n k) (hk : 1 < k) :
∃ m, n * m % k = 1 :=
Exists.recOn (exists_mul_emod_eq_gcd (lt_of_le_of_lt (le_of_eq hkn) hk)) fun m hm ↦
⟨m, hm.trans hkn⟩
end Nat
/-! ### Divisibility over ℤ -/
namespace Int
theorem gcd_def (i j : ℤ) : gcd i j = Nat.gcd i.natAbs j.natAbs := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] protected lemma gcd_natCast_natCast (m n : ℕ) : gcd ↑m ↑n = m.gcd n := rfl
/-- The extended GCD `a` value in the equation `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. -/
def gcdA : ℤ → ℤ → ℤ
| ofNat m, n => m.gcdA n.natAbs
| -[m+1], n => -m.succ.gcdA n.natAbs
/-- The extended GCD `b` value in the equation `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. -/
def gcdB : ℤ → ℤ → ℤ
| m, ofNat n => m.natAbs.gcdB n
| m, -[n+1] => -m.natAbs.gcdB n.succ
/-- **Bézout's lemma** -/
theorem gcd_eq_gcd_ab : ∀ x y : ℤ, (gcd x y : ℤ) = x * gcdA x y + y * gcdB x y
| (m : ℕ), (n : ℕ) => Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab _ _
| (m : ℕ), -[n+1] =>
show (_ : ℤ) = _ + -(n + 1) * -_ by rw [Int.neg_mul_neg]; apply Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab
| -[m+1], (n : ℕ) =>
show (_ : ℤ) = -(m + 1) * -_ + _ by rw [Int.neg_mul_neg]; apply Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab
| -[m+1], -[n+1] =>
show (_ : ℤ) = -(m + 1) * -_ + -(n + 1) * -_ by
rw [Int.neg_mul_neg, Int.neg_mul_neg]
apply Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab
theorem lcm_def (i j : ℤ) : lcm i j = Nat.lcm (natAbs i) (natAbs j) :=
rfl
protected theorem coe_nat_lcm (m n : ℕ) : Int.lcm ↑m ↑n = Nat.lcm m n :=
rfl
theorem dvd_coe_gcd {i j k : ℤ} (h1 : k ∣ i) (h2 : k ∣ j) : k ∣ gcd i j :=
natAbs_dvd.1 <|
natCast_dvd_natCast.2 <| Nat.dvd_gcd (natAbs_dvd_natAbs.2 h1) (natAbs_dvd_natAbs.2 h2)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")] alias dvd_gcd := dvd_coe_gcd
theorem gcd_mul_lcm (i j : ℤ) : gcd i j * lcm i j = natAbs (i * j) := by
rw [Int.gcd, Int.lcm, Nat.gcd_mul_lcm, natAbs_mul]
theorem gcd_comm (i j : ℤ) : gcd i j = gcd j i :=
Nat.gcd_comm _ _
theorem gcd_assoc (i j k : ℤ) : gcd (gcd i j) k = gcd i (gcd j k) :=
Nat.gcd_assoc _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem gcd_self (i : ℤ) : gcd i i = natAbs i := by simp [gcd]
@[simp]
theorem gcd_zero_left (i : ℤ) : gcd 0 i = natAbs i := by simp [gcd]
@[simp]
theorem gcd_zero_right (i : ℤ) : gcd i 0 = natAbs i := by simp [gcd]
theorem gcd_mul_left (i j k : ℤ) : gcd (i * j) (i * k) = natAbs i * gcd j k := by
rw [Int.gcd, Int.gcd, natAbs_mul, natAbs_mul]
apply Nat.gcd_mul_left
theorem gcd_mul_right (i j k : ℤ) : gcd (i * j) (k * j) = gcd i k * natAbs j := by
rw [Int.gcd, Int.gcd, natAbs_mul, natAbs_mul]
apply Nat.gcd_mul_right
theorem gcd_pos_of_ne_zero_left {i : ℤ} (j : ℤ) (hi : i ≠ 0) : 0 < gcd i j :=
Nat.gcd_pos_of_pos_left _ <| natAbs_pos.2 hi
theorem gcd_pos_of_ne_zero_right (i : ℤ) {j : ℤ} (hj : j ≠ 0) : 0 < gcd i j :=
Nat.gcd_pos_of_pos_right _ <| natAbs_pos.2 hj
theorem gcd_eq_zero_iff {i j : ℤ} : gcd i j = 0 ↔ i = 0 ∧ j = 0 := by
rw [gcd, Nat.gcd_eq_zero_iff, natAbs_eq_zero, natAbs_eq_zero]
theorem gcd_pos_iff {i j : ℤ} : 0 < gcd i j ↔ i ≠ 0 ∨ j ≠ 0 :=
Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.trans <| gcd_eq_zero_iff.not.trans not_and_or
theorem gcd_div {i j k : ℤ} (H1 : k ∣ i) (H2 : k ∣ j) :
gcd (i / k) (j / k) = gcd i j / natAbs k := by
rw [gcd, natAbs_ediv_of_dvd i k H1, natAbs_ediv_of_dvd j k H2]
exact Nat.gcd_div (natAbs_dvd_natAbs.mpr H1) (natAbs_dvd_natAbs.mpr H2)
theorem gcd_div_gcd_div_gcd {i j : ℤ} (H : 0 < gcd i j) : gcd (i / gcd i j) (j / gcd i j) = 1 := by
rw [gcd_div gcd_dvd_left gcd_dvd_right, natAbs_ofNat, Nat.div_self H]
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_left {i k : ℤ} (j : ℤ) (H : i ∣ k) : gcd i j ∣ gcd k j :=
Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.1 <| dvd_coe_gcd (gcd_dvd_left.trans H) gcd_dvd_right
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_right {i k : ℤ} (j : ℤ) (H : i ∣ k) : gcd j i ∣ gcd j k :=
| Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.1 <| dvd_coe_gcd gcd_dvd_left (gcd_dvd_right.trans H)
| Mathlib/Data/Int/GCD.lean | 241 | 241 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Ellen Arlt. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Ellen Arlt, Blair Shi, Sean Leather, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin, Lu-Ming Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Opposite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.RingEquiv
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Mul
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Pi
/-!
# Matrices
This file contains basic results on matrices including bundled versions of matrix operators.
## Implementation notes
For convenience, `Matrix m n α` is defined as `m → n → α`, as this allows elements of the matrix
to be accessed with `A i j`. However, it is not advisable to _construct_ matrices using terms of the
form `fun i j ↦ _` or even `(fun i j ↦ _ : Matrix m n α)`, as these are not recognized by Lean
as having the right type. Instead, `Matrix.of` should be used.
## TODO
Under various conditions, multiplication of infinite matrices makes sense.
These have not yet been implemented.
-/
assert_not_exists Star
universe u u' v w
variable {l m n o : Type*} {m' : o → Type*} {n' : o → Type*}
variable {R : Type*} {S : Type*} {α : Type v} {β : Type w} {γ : Type*}
namespace Matrix
instance decidableEq [DecidableEq α] [Fintype m] [Fintype n] : DecidableEq (Matrix m n α) :=
Fintype.decidablePiFintype
instance {n m} [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] (α) [Fintype α] :
Fintype (Matrix m n α) := inferInstanceAs (Fintype (m → n → α))
instance {n m} [Finite m] [Finite n] (α) [Finite α] :
Finite (Matrix m n α) := inferInstanceAs (Finite (m → n → α))
section
variable (R)
/-- This is `Matrix.of` bundled as a linear equivalence. -/
def ofLinearEquiv [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] : (m → n → α) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n α where
__ := ofAddEquiv
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_ofLinearEquiv [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
⇑(ofLinearEquiv _ : (m → n → α) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n α) = of := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_ofLinearEquiv_symm [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
⇑((ofLinearEquiv _).symm : Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] (m → n → α)) = of.symm := rfl
end
theorem sum_apply [AddCommMonoid α] (i : m) (j : n) (s : Finset β) (g : β → Matrix m n α) :
(∑ c ∈ s, g c) i j = ∑ c ∈ s, g c i j :=
(congr_fun (s.sum_apply i g) j).trans (s.sum_apply j _)
end Matrix
open Matrix
namespace Matrix
section Diagonal
variable [DecidableEq n]
variable (n α)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalAddMonoidHom [AddZeroClass α] : (n → α) →+ Matrix n n α where
toFun := diagonal
map_zero' := diagonal_zero
map_add' x y := (diagonal_add x y).symm
variable (R)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalLinearMap [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] : (n → α) →ₗ[R] Matrix n n α :=
{ diagonalAddMonoidHom n α with map_smul' := diagonal_smul }
variable {n α R}
section One
variable [Zero α] [One α]
lemma zero_le_one_elem [Preorder α] [ZeroLEOneClass α] (i j : n) :
0 ≤ (1 : Matrix n n α) i j := by
by_cases hi : i = j
· subst hi
simp
· simp [hi]
lemma zero_le_one_row [Preorder α] [ZeroLEOneClass α] (i : n) :
0 ≤ (1 : Matrix n n α) i :=
zero_le_one_elem i
end One
end Diagonal
section Diag
variable (n α)
/-- `Matrix.diag` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagAddMonoidHom [AddZeroClass α] : Matrix n n α →+ n → α where
toFun := diag
map_zero' := diag_zero
map_add' := diag_add
variable (R)
/-- `Matrix.diag` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def diagLinearMap [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] : Matrix n n α →ₗ[R] n → α :=
{ diagAddMonoidHom n α with map_smul' := diag_smul }
variable {n α R}
@[simp]
theorem diag_list_sum [AddMonoid α] (l : List (Matrix n n α)) : diag l.sum = (l.map diag).sum :=
map_list_sum (diagAddMonoidHom n α) l
@[simp]
theorem diag_multiset_sum [AddCommMonoid α] (s : Multiset (Matrix n n α)) :
diag s.sum = (s.map diag).sum :=
map_multiset_sum (diagAddMonoidHom n α) s
@[simp]
theorem diag_sum {ι} [AddCommMonoid α] (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Matrix n n α) :
diag (∑ i ∈ s, f i) = ∑ i ∈ s, diag (f i) :=
map_sum (diagAddMonoidHom n α) f s
end Diag
open Matrix
section AddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid α] [Mul α]
end AddCommMonoid
section NonAssocSemiring
variable [NonAssocSemiring α]
variable (α n)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as a `RingHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalRingHom [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] : (n → α) →+* Matrix n n α :=
{ diagonalAddMonoidHom n α with
toFun := diagonal
map_one' := diagonal_one
map_mul' := fun _ _ => (diagonal_mul_diagonal' _ _).symm }
end NonAssocSemiring
section Semiring
variable [Semiring α]
theorem diagonal_pow [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] (v : n → α) (k : ℕ) :
diagonal v ^ k = diagonal (v ^ k) :=
(map_pow (diagonalRingHom n α) v k).symm
/-- The ring homomorphism `α →+* Matrix n n α`
sending `a` to the diagonal matrix with `a` on the diagonal.
-/
def scalar (n : Type u) [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n] : α →+* Matrix n n α :=
(diagonalRingHom n α).comp <| Pi.constRingHom n α
section Scalar
variable [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n]
@[simp]
theorem scalar_apply (a : α) : scalar n a = diagonal fun _ => a :=
rfl
theorem scalar_inj [Nonempty n] {r s : α} : scalar n r = scalar n s ↔ r = s :=
(diagonal_injective.comp Function.const_injective).eq_iff
theorem scalar_commute_iff {r : α} {M : Matrix n n α} :
Commute (scalar n r) M ↔ r • M = MulOpposite.op r • M := by
simp_rw [Commute, SemiconjBy, scalar_apply, ← smul_eq_diagonal_mul, ← op_smul_eq_mul_diagonal]
theorem scalar_commute (r : α) (hr : ∀ r', Commute r r') (M : Matrix n n α) :
Commute (scalar n r) M := scalar_commute_iff.2 <| ext fun _ _ => hr _
end Scalar
end Semiring
section Algebra
variable [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n]
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring α] [Semiring β] [Algebra R α] [Algebra R β]
instance instAlgebra : Algebra R (Matrix n n α) where
algebraMap := (Matrix.scalar n).comp (algebraMap R α)
commutes' _ _ := scalar_commute _ (fun _ => Algebra.commutes _ _) _
smul_def' r x := by ext; simp [Matrix.scalar, Algebra.smul_def r]
theorem algebraMap_matrix_apply {r : R} {i j : n} :
algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) r i j = if i = j then algebraMap R α r else 0 := by
dsimp [algebraMap, Algebra.algebraMap, Matrix.scalar]
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h, Matrix.one_apply_ne]
theorem algebraMap_eq_diagonal (r : R) :
algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) r = diagonal (algebraMap R (n → α) r) := rfl
theorem algebraMap_eq_diagonalRingHom :
algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) = (diagonalRingHom n α).comp (algebraMap R _) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_algebraMap (r : R) (f : α → β) (hf : f 0 = 0)
(hf₂ : f (algebraMap R α r) = algebraMap R β r) :
(algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) r).map f = algebraMap R (Matrix n n β) r := by
rw [algebraMap_eq_diagonal, algebraMap_eq_diagonal, diagonal_map hf]
simp [hf₂]
variable (R)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as an `AlgHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalAlgHom : (n → α) →ₐ[R] Matrix n n α :=
{ diagonalRingHom n α with
toFun := diagonal
commutes' := fun r => (algebraMap_eq_diagonal r).symm }
end Algebra
section AddHom
variable [Add α]
variable (R α) in
/-- Extracting entries from a matrix as an additive homomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def entryAddHom (i : m) (j : n) : AddHom (Matrix m n α) α where
toFun M := M i j
map_add' _ _ := rfl
-- It is necessary to spell out the name of the coercion explicitly on the RHS
-- for unification to succeed
lemma entryAddHom_eq_comp {i : m} {j : n} :
entryAddHom α i j =
((Pi.evalAddHom (fun _ => α) j).comp (Pi.evalAddHom _ i)).comp
(AddHomClass.toAddHom ofAddEquiv.symm) :=
rfl
end AddHom
section AddMonoidHom
variable [AddZeroClass α]
variable (R α) in
/--
Extracting entries from a matrix as an additive monoid homomorphism. Note this cannot be upgraded to
a ring homomorphism, as it does not respect multiplication.
-/
@[simps]
def entryAddMonoidHom (i : m) (j : n) : Matrix m n α →+ α where
toFun M := M i j
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_zero' := rfl
-- It is necessary to spell out the name of the coercion explicitly on the RHS
-- for unification to succeed
lemma entryAddMonoidHom_eq_comp {i : m} {j : n} :
entryAddMonoidHom α i j =
((Pi.evalAddMonoidHom (fun _ => α) j).comp (Pi.evalAddMonoidHom _ i)).comp
(AddMonoidHomClass.toAddMonoidHom ofAddEquiv.symm) := by
rfl
@[simp] lemma evalAddMonoidHom_comp_diagAddMonoidHom (i : m) :
(Pi.evalAddMonoidHom _ i).comp (diagAddMonoidHom m α) = entryAddMonoidHom α i i := by
simp [AddMonoidHom.ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma entryAddMonoidHom_toAddHom {i : m} {j : n} :
(entryAddMonoidHom α i j : AddHom _ _) = entryAddHom α i j := rfl
end AddMonoidHom
section LinearMap
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α]
variable (R α) in
/--
Extracting entries from a matrix as a linear map. Note this cannot be upgraded to an algebra
homomorphism, as it does not respect multiplication.
-/
@[simps]
def entryLinearMap (i : m) (j : n) :
Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] α where
toFun M := M i j
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
-- It is necessary to spell out the name of the coercion explicitly on the RHS
-- for unification to succeed
lemma entryLinearMap_eq_comp {i : m} {j : n} :
entryLinearMap R α i j =
LinearMap.proj j ∘ₗ LinearMap.proj i ∘ₗ (ofLinearEquiv R).symm.toLinearMap := by
rfl
@[simp] lemma proj_comp_diagLinearMap (i : m) :
LinearMap.proj i ∘ₗ diagLinearMap m R α = entryLinearMap R α i i := by
simp [LinearMap.ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_toAddMonoidHom {i : m} {j : n} :
(entryLinearMap R α i j : _ →+ _) = entryAddMonoidHom α i j := rfl
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_toAddHom {i : m} {j : n} :
(entryLinearMap R α i j : AddHom _ _) = entryAddHom α i j := rfl
end LinearMap
end Matrix
/-!
### Bundled versions of `Matrix.map`
-/
namespace Equiv
/-- The `Equiv` between spaces of matrices induced by an `Equiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `Equiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃ β) : Matrix m n α ≃ Matrix m n β where
toFun M := M.map f
invFun M := M.map f.symm
left_inv _ := Matrix.ext fun _ _ => f.symm_apply_apply _
right_inv _ := Matrix.ext fun _ _ => f.apply_symm_apply _
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (Equiv.refl α).mapMatrix = Equiv.refl (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃ β) : f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m n β ≃ _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃ β) (g : β ≃ γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α ≃ _) :=
rfl
end Equiv
namespace AddMonoidHom
variable [AddZeroClass α] [AddZeroClass β] [AddZeroClass γ]
/-- The `AddMonoidHom` between spaces of matrices induced by an `AddMonoidHom` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →+ β) : Matrix m n α →+ Matrix m n β where
toFun M := M.map f
map_zero' := Matrix.map_zero f f.map_zero
map_add' := Matrix.map_add f f.map_add
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : (AddMonoidHom.id α).mapMatrix = AddMonoidHom.id (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →+ γ) (g : α →+ β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α →+ _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryAddMonoidHom_comp_mapMatrix (f : α →+ β) (i : m) (j : n) :
(entryAddMonoidHom β i j).comp f.mapMatrix = f.comp (entryAddMonoidHom α i j) := rfl
end AddMonoidHom
namespace AddEquiv
variable [Add α] [Add β] [Add γ]
/-- The `AddEquiv` between spaces of matrices induced by an `AddEquiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AddEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃+ β) : Matrix m n α ≃+ Matrix m n β :=
{ f.toEquiv.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
invFun := fun M => M.map f.symm
map_add' := Matrix.map_add f (map_add f) }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (AddEquiv.refl α).mapMatrix = AddEquiv.refl (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃+ β) : f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m n β ≃+ _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃+ β) (g : β ≃+ γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α ≃+ _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryAddHom_comp_mapMatrix (f : α ≃+ β) (i : m) (j : n) :
(entryAddHom β i j).comp (AddHomClass.toAddHom f.mapMatrix) =
(f : AddHom α β).comp (entryAddHom _ i j) := rfl
end AddEquiv
namespace LinearMap
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [AddCommMonoid β] [AddCommMonoid γ]
variable [Module R α] [Module R β] [Module R γ]
/-- The `LinearMap` between spaces of matrices induced by a `LinearMap` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →ₗ[R] β) : Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] Matrix m n β where
toFun M := M.map f
map_add' := Matrix.map_add f f.map_add
map_smul' r := Matrix.map_smul f r (f.map_smul r)
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : LinearMap.id.mapMatrix = (LinearMap.id : Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →ₗ[R] γ) (g : α →ₗ[R] β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_comp_mapMatrix (f : α →ₗ[R] β) (i : m) (j : n) :
entryLinearMap R _ i j ∘ₗ f.mapMatrix = f ∘ₗ entryLinearMap R _ i j := rfl
end LinearMap
namespace LinearEquiv
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [AddCommMonoid β] [AddCommMonoid γ]
variable [Module R α] [Module R β] [Module R γ]
/-- The `LinearEquiv` between spaces of matrices induced by a `LinearEquiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as a `LinearEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) : Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n β :=
{ f.toEquiv.mapMatrix,
f.toLinearMap.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
invFun := fun M => M.map f.symm }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (LinearEquiv.refl R α).mapMatrix = LinearEquiv.refl R (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) :
f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m n β ≃ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) (g : β ≃ₗ[R] γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma mapMatrix_toLinearMap (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) :
(f.mapMatrix : _ ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n β).toLinearMap = f.toLinearMap.mapMatrix := by
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_comp_mapMatrix (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) (i : m) (j : n) :
entryLinearMap R _ i j ∘ₗ f.mapMatrix.toLinearMap =
f.toLinearMap ∘ₗ entryLinearMap R _ i j := by
simp only [mapMatrix_toLinearMap, LinearMap.entryLinearMap_comp_mapMatrix]
end LinearEquiv
namespace RingHom
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable [NonAssocSemiring α] [NonAssocSemiring β] [NonAssocSemiring γ]
/-- The `RingHom` between spaces of square matrices induced by a `RingHom` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as a `RingHom`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →+* β) : Matrix m m α →+* Matrix m m β :=
{ f.toAddMonoidHom.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
map_one' := by simp
map_mul' := fun _ _ => Matrix.map_mul }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : (RingHom.id α).mapMatrix = RingHom.id (Matrix m m α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →+* γ) (g : α →+* β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m m α →+* _) :=
rfl
end RingHom
namespace RingEquiv
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable [NonAssocSemiring α] [NonAssocSemiring β] [NonAssocSemiring γ]
/-- The `RingEquiv` between spaces of square matrices induced by a `RingEquiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as a `RingEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃+* β) : Matrix m m α ≃+* Matrix m m β :=
{ f.toRingHom.mapMatrix,
f.toAddEquiv.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
invFun := fun M => M.map f.symm }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (RingEquiv.refl α).mapMatrix = RingEquiv.refl (Matrix m m α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃+* β) : f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m m β ≃+* _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃+* β) (g : β ≃+* γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m m α ≃+* _) :=
rfl
open MulOpposite in
/--
For any ring `R`, we have ring isomorphism `Matₙₓₙ(Rᵒᵖ) ≅ (Matₙₓₙ(R))ᵒᵖ` given by transpose.
-/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def mopMatrix : Matrix m m αᵐᵒᵖ ≃+* (Matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ where
toFun M := op (M.transpose.map unop)
invFun M := M.unop.transpose.map op
left_inv _ := by aesop
right_inv _ := by aesop
map_mul' _ _ := unop_injective <| by ext; simp [transpose, mul_apply]
map_add' _ _ := by aesop
end RingEquiv
namespace AlgHom
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring α] [Semiring β] [Semiring γ]
variable [Algebra R α] [Algebra R β] [Algebra R γ]
/-- The `AlgHom` between spaces of square matrices induced by an `AlgHom` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AlgHom`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →ₐ[R] β) : Matrix m m α →ₐ[R] Matrix m m β :=
{ f.toRingHom.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
commutes' := fun r => Matrix.map_algebraMap r f (map_zero _) (f.commutes r) }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : (AlgHom.id R α).mapMatrix = AlgHom.id R (Matrix m m α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →ₐ[R] γ) (g : α →ₐ[R] β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m m α →ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
end AlgHom
namespace AlgEquiv
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring α] [Semiring β] [Semiring γ]
variable [Algebra R α] [Algebra R β] [Algebra R γ]
/-- The `AlgEquiv` between spaces of square matrices induced by an `AlgEquiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AlgEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃ₐ[R] β) : Matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] Matrix m m β :=
{ f.toAlgHom.mapMatrix,
f.toRingEquiv.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
invFun := fun M => M.map f.symm }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : AlgEquiv.refl.mapMatrix = (AlgEquiv.refl : Matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃ₐ[R] β) :
f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m m β ≃ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃ₐ[R] β) (g : β ≃ₐ[R] γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
/-- For any algebra `α` over a ring `R`, we have an `R`-algebra isomorphism
`Matₙₓₙ(αᵒᵖ) ≅ (Matₙₓₙ(R))ᵒᵖ` given by transpose. If `α` is commutative,
we can get rid of the `ᵒᵖ` in the left-hand side, see `Matrix.transposeAlgEquiv`. -/
@[simps!] def mopMatrix : Matrix m m αᵐᵒᵖ ≃ₐ[R] (Matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ where
__ := RingEquiv.mopMatrix
commutes' _ := MulOpposite.unop_injective <| by
ext; simp [algebraMap_matrix_apply, eq_comm, apply_ite MulOpposite.unop]
end AlgEquiv
open Matrix
namespace Matrix
section Transpose
open Matrix
variable (m n α)
/-- `Matrix.transpose` as an `AddEquiv` -/
@[simps apply]
def transposeAddEquiv [Add α] : Matrix m n α ≃+ Matrix n m α where
toFun := transpose
invFun := transpose
left_inv := transpose_transpose
right_inv := transpose_transpose
map_add' := transpose_add
@[simp]
theorem transposeAddEquiv_symm [Add α] : (transposeAddEquiv m n α).symm = transposeAddEquiv n m α :=
rfl
variable {m n α}
theorem transpose_list_sum [AddMonoid α] (l : List (Matrix m n α)) :
l.sumᵀ = (l.map transpose).sum :=
map_list_sum (transposeAddEquiv m n α) l
theorem transpose_multiset_sum [AddCommMonoid α] (s : Multiset (Matrix m n α)) :
s.sumᵀ = (s.map transpose).sum :=
(transposeAddEquiv m n α).toAddMonoidHom.map_multiset_sum s
theorem transpose_sum [AddCommMonoid α] {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (M : ι → Matrix m n α) :
(∑ i ∈ s, M i)ᵀ = ∑ i ∈ s, (M i)ᵀ :=
map_sum (transposeAddEquiv m n α) _ s
variable (m n R α)
/-- `Matrix.transpose` as a `LinearMap` -/
@[simps apply]
def transposeLinearEquiv [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] Matrix n m α :=
{ transposeAddEquiv m n α with map_smul' := transpose_smul }
@[simp]
theorem transposeLinearEquiv_symm [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
(transposeLinearEquiv m n R α).symm = transposeLinearEquiv n m R α :=
rfl
variable {m n R α}
variable (m α)
/-- `Matrix.transpose` as a `RingEquiv` to the opposite ring -/
@[simps]
def transposeRingEquiv [AddCommMonoid α] [CommSemigroup α] [Fintype m] :
Matrix m m α ≃+* (Matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ (transposeAddEquiv m m α).trans MulOpposite.opAddEquiv with
toFun := fun M => MulOpposite.op Mᵀ
invFun := fun M => M.unopᵀ
map_mul' := fun M N =>
(congr_arg MulOpposite.op (transpose_mul M N)).trans (MulOpposite.op_mul _ _)
left_inv := fun M => transpose_transpose M
right_inv := fun M => MulOpposite.unop_injective <| transpose_transpose M.unop }
variable {m α}
@[simp]
theorem transpose_pow [CommSemiring α] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] (M : Matrix m m α) (k : ℕ) :
(M ^ k)ᵀ = Mᵀ ^ k :=
MulOpposite.op_injective <| map_pow (transposeRingEquiv m α) M k
theorem transpose_list_prod [CommSemiring α] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] (l : List (Matrix m m α)) :
l.prodᵀ = (l.map transpose).reverse.prod :=
(transposeRingEquiv m α).unop_map_list_prod l
variable (R m α)
/-- `Matrix.transpose` as an `AlgEquiv` to the opposite ring -/
@[simps]
def transposeAlgEquiv [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring α] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] [Algebra R α] :
Matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] (Matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ (transposeAddEquiv m m α).trans MulOpposite.opAddEquiv,
transposeRingEquiv m α with
toFun := fun M => MulOpposite.op Mᵀ
commutes' := fun r => by
simp only [algebraMap_eq_diagonal, diagonal_transpose, MulOpposite.algebraMap_apply] }
variable {R m α}
end Transpose
end Matrix
| Mathlib/Data/Matrix/Basic.lean | 2,811 | 2,813 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SimpleFunc
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Metrizable
/-!
# Density of simple functions
Show that each Borel measurable function can be approximated pointwise
by a sequence of simple functions.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.nearestPt (e : ℕ → α) (N : ℕ) : α →ₛ ℕ`: the `SimpleFunc` sending
each `x : α` to the point `e k` which is the nearest to `x` among `e 0`, ..., `e N`.
* `MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.approxOn (f : β → α) (hf : Measurable f) (s : Set α) (y₀ : α)
(h₀ : y₀ ∈ s) [SeparableSpace s] (n : ℕ) : β →ₛ α` : a simple function that takes values in `s`
and approximates `f`.
## Main results
* `tendsto_approxOn` (pointwise convergence): If `f x ∈ s`, then the sequence of simple
approximations `MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.approxOn f hf s y₀ h₀ n`, evaluated at `x`,
tends to `f x` as `n` tends to `∞`.
## Notations
* `α →ₛ β` (local notation): the type of simple functions `α → β`.
-/
open Set Function Filter TopologicalSpace ENNReal EMetric Finset
open Topology ENNReal MeasureTheory
variable {α β ι E F 𝕜 : Type*}
noncomputable section
namespace MeasureTheory
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
namespace SimpleFunc
/-! ### Pointwise approximation by simple functions -/
variable [MeasurableSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
/-- `nearestPtInd e N x` is the index `k` such that `e k` is the nearest point to `x` among the
points `e 0`, ..., `e N`. If more than one point are at the same distance from `x`, then
`nearestPtInd e N x` returns the least of their indexes. -/
noncomputable def nearestPtInd (e : ℕ → α) : ℕ → α →ₛ ℕ
| 0 => const α 0
| N + 1 =>
piecewise (⋂ k ≤ N, { x | edist (e (N + 1)) x < edist (e k) x })
(MeasurableSet.iInter fun _ =>
MeasurableSet.iInter fun _ =>
measurableSet_lt measurable_edist_right measurable_edist_right)
(const α <| N + 1) (nearestPtInd e N)
/-- `nearestPt e N x` is the nearest point to `x` among the points `e 0`, ..., `e N`. If more than
one point are at the same distance from `x`, then `nearestPt e N x` returns the point with the
least possible index. -/
noncomputable def nearestPt (e : ℕ → α) (N : ℕ) : α →ₛ α :=
(nearestPtInd e N).map e
@[simp]
theorem nearestPtInd_zero (e : ℕ → α) : nearestPtInd e 0 = const α 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem nearestPt_zero (e : ℕ → α) : nearestPt e 0 = const α (e 0) :=
rfl
theorem nearestPtInd_succ (e : ℕ → α) (N : ℕ) (x : α) :
nearestPtInd e (N + 1) x =
if ∀ k ≤ N, edist (e (N + 1)) x < edist (e k) x then N + 1 else nearestPtInd e N x := by
simp only [nearestPtInd, coe_piecewise, Set.piecewise]
congr
simp
theorem nearestPtInd_le (e : ℕ → α) (N : ℕ) (x : α) : nearestPtInd e N x ≤ N := by
induction' N with N ihN; · simp
simp only [nearestPtInd_succ]
split_ifs
exacts [le_rfl, ihN.trans N.le_succ]
theorem edist_nearestPt_le (e : ℕ → α) (x : α) {k N : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ N) :
edist (nearestPt e N x) x ≤ edist (e k) x := by
induction' N with N ihN generalizing k
· simp [nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 hk, le_refl]
· simp only [nearestPt, nearestPtInd_succ, map_apply]
split_ifs with h
· rcases hk.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hk)
exacts [le_rfl, (h k (Nat.lt_succ_iff.1 hk)).le]
· push_neg at h
rcases h with ⟨l, hlN, hxl⟩
rcases hk.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hk)
exacts [(ihN hlN).trans hxl, ihN (Nat.lt_succ_iff.1 hk)]
theorem tendsto_nearestPt {e : ℕ → α} {x : α} (hx : x ∈ closure (range e)) :
Tendsto (fun N => nearestPt e N x) atTop (𝓝 x) := by
refine (atTop_basis.tendsto_iff nhds_basis_eball).2 fun ε hε => ?_
rcases EMetric.mem_closure_iff.1 hx ε hε with ⟨_, ⟨N, rfl⟩, hN⟩
rw [edist_comm] at hN
exact ⟨N, trivial, fun n hn => (edist_nearestPt_le e x hn).trans_lt hN⟩
variable [MeasurableSpace β] {f : β → α}
/-- Approximate a measurable function by a sequence of simple functions `F n` such that
`F n x ∈ s`. -/
noncomputable def approxOn (f : β → α) (hf : Measurable f) (s : Set α) (y₀ : α) (h₀ : y₀ ∈ s)
[SeparableSpace s] (n : ℕ) : β →ₛ α :=
haveI : Nonempty s := ⟨⟨y₀, h₀⟩⟩
comp (nearestPt (fun k => Nat.casesOn k y₀ ((↑) ∘ denseSeq s) : ℕ → α) n) f hf
@[simp]
theorem approxOn_zero {f : β → α} (hf : Measurable f) {s : Set α} {y₀ : α} (h₀ : y₀ ∈ s)
[SeparableSpace s] (x : β) : approxOn f hf s y₀ h₀ 0 x = y₀ :=
rfl
theorem approxOn_mem {f : β → α} (hf : Measurable f) {s : Set α} {y₀ : α} (h₀ : y₀ ∈ s)
[SeparableSpace s] (n : ℕ) (x : β) : approxOn f hf s y₀ h₀ n x ∈ s := by
haveI : Nonempty s := ⟨⟨y₀, h₀⟩⟩
suffices ∀ n, (Nat.casesOn n y₀ ((↑) ∘ denseSeq s) : α) ∈ s by apply this
rintro (_ | n)
exacts [h₀, Subtype.mem _]
lemma approxOn_range_nonneg [Zero α] [Preorder α] {f : β → α}
(hf : 0 ≤ f) {hfm : Measurable f} [SeparableSpace (range f ∪ {0} : Set α)] (n : ℕ) :
0 ≤ approxOn f hfm (range f ∪ {0}) 0 (by simp) n := by
have : range f ∪ {0} ⊆ Set.Ici 0 := by
simp only [Set.union_singleton, Set.insert_subset_iff, Set.mem_Ici, le_refl, true_and]
rintro - ⟨x, rfl⟩
| exact hf x
exact fun _ ↦ this <| approxOn_mem ..
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note: LHS doesn't simplify.
-- It seems the side conditions `hf` and `hg` are not applied by `simpNF`.
theorem approxOn_comp {γ : Type*} [MeasurableSpace γ] {f : β → α} (hf : Measurable f) {g : γ → β}
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/SimpleFuncDense.lean | 140 | 145 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Functor
/-!
# Endofunctors as a monoidal category.
We give the monoidal category structure on `C ⥤ C`,
and show that when `C` itself is monoidal, it embeds via a monoidal functor into `C ⥤ C`.
## TODO
Can we use this to show coherence results, e.g. a cheap proof that `λ_ (𝟙_ C) = ρ_ (𝟙_ C)`?
I suspect this is harder than is usually made out.
-/
universe v u
namespace CategoryTheory
open Functor.LaxMonoidal Functor.OplaxMonoidal Functor.Monoidal
variable (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C]
/-- The category of endofunctors of any category is a monoidal category,
with tensor product given by composition of functors
(and horizontal composition of natural transformations).
-/
def endofunctorMonoidalCategory : MonoidalCategory (C ⥤ C) where
tensorObj F G := F ⋙ G
whiskerLeft X _ _ F := whiskerLeft X F
whiskerRight F X := whiskerRight F X
tensorHom α β := α ◫ β
tensorUnit := 𝟭 C
associator F G H := Functor.associator F G H
leftUnitor F := Functor.leftUnitor F
rightUnitor F := Functor.rightUnitor F
open CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory
attribute [local instance] endofunctorMonoidalCategory
@[simp] theorem endofunctorMonoidalCategory_tensorUnit_obj (X : C) :
(𝟙_ (C ⥤ C)).obj X = X := rfl
@[simp] theorem endofunctorMonoidalCategory_tensorUnit_map {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(𝟙_ (C ⥤ C)).map f = f := rfl
@[simp] theorem endofunctorMonoidalCategory_tensorObj_obj (F G : C ⥤ C) (X : C) :
(F ⊗ G).obj X = G.obj (F.obj X) := rfl
@[simp] theorem endofunctorMonoidalCategory_tensorObj_map (F G : C ⥤ C) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(F ⊗ G).map f = G.map (F.map f) := rfl
@[simp] theorem endofunctorMonoidalCategory_tensorMap_app
{F G H K : C ⥤ C} {α : F ⟶ G} {β : H ⟶ K} (X : C) :
(α ⊗ β).app X = β.app (F.obj X) ≫ K.map (α.app X) := rfl
@[simp] theorem endofunctorMonoidalCategory_whiskerLeft_app
{F H K : C ⥤ C} {β : H ⟶ K} (X : C) :
(F ◁ β).app X = β.app (F.obj X) := rfl
@[simp] theorem endofunctorMonoidalCategory_whiskerRight_app
{F G H : C ⥤ C} {α : F ⟶ G} (X : C) :
(α ▷ H).app X = H.map (α.app X) := rfl
@[simp] theorem endofunctorMonoidalCategory_associator_hom_app (F G H : C ⥤ C) (X : C) :
(α_ F G H).hom.app X = 𝟙 _ := rfl
@[simp] theorem endofunctorMonoidalCategory_associator_inv_app (F G H : C ⥤ C) (X : C) :
(α_ F G H).inv.app X = 𝟙 _ := rfl
@[simp] theorem endofunctorMonoidalCategory_leftUnitor_hom_app (F : C ⥤ C) (X : C) :
(λ_ F).hom.app X = 𝟙 _ := rfl
@[simp] theorem endofunctorMonoidalCategory_leftUnitor_inv_app (F : C ⥤ C) (X : C) :
(λ_ F).inv.app X = 𝟙 _ := rfl
@[simp] theorem endofunctorMonoidalCategory_rightUnitor_hom_app (F : C ⥤ C) (X : C) :
(ρ_ F).hom.app X = 𝟙 _ := rfl
@[simp] theorem endofunctorMonoidalCategory_rightUnitor_inv_app (F : C ⥤ C) (X : C) :
(ρ_ F).inv.app X = 𝟙 _ := rfl
namespace MonoidalCategory
variable [MonoidalCategory C]
/-- Tensoring on the right gives a monoidal functor from `C` into endofunctors of `C`.
-/
instance : (tensoringRight C).Monoidal :=
Functor.CoreMonoidal.toMonoidal
{ εIso := (rightUnitorNatIso C).symm
μIso := fun X Y => (isoWhiskerRight (curriedAssociatorNatIso C)
((evaluation C (C ⥤ C)).obj X ⋙ (evaluation C C).obj Y)) }
@[simp] lemma tensoringRight_ε :
ε (tensoringRight C) = (rightUnitorNatIso C).inv := rfl
@[simp] lemma tensoringRight_η :
η (tensoringRight C) = (rightUnitorNatIso C).hom := rfl
@[simp] lemma tensoringRight_μ (X Y : C) (Z : C) :
(μ (tensoringRight C) X Y).app Z = (α_ Z X Y).hom := rfl
@[simp] lemma tensoringRight_δ (X Y : C) (Z : C) :
(δ (tensoringRight C) X Y).app Z = (α_ Z X Y).inv := rfl
end MonoidalCategory
variable {C}
variable {M : Type*} [Category M] [MonoidalCategory M] (F : M ⥤ (C ⥤ C))
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem μ_δ_app (i j : M) (X : C) [F.Monoidal] :
(μ F i j).app X ≫ (δ F i j).app X = 𝟙 _ :=
(μIso F i j).hom_inv_id_app X
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem δ_μ_app (i j : M) (X : C) [F.Monoidal] :
(δ F i j).app X ≫ (μ F i j).app X = 𝟙 _ :=
(μIso F i j).inv_hom_id_app X
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem ε_η_app (X : C) [F.Monoidal] : (ε F).app X ≫ (η F).app X = 𝟙 _ :=
(εIso F).hom_inv_id_app X
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem η_ε_app (X : C) [F.Monoidal] : (η F).app X ≫ (ε F).app X = 𝟙 _ :=
(εIso F).inv_hom_id_app X
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem ε_naturality {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [F.LaxMonoidal] :
(ε F).app X ≫ (F.obj (𝟙_ M)).map f = f ≫ (ε F).app Y :=
((ε F).naturality f).symm
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem η_naturality {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [F.OplaxMonoidal]:
(η F).app X ≫ (𝟙_ (C ⥤ C)).map f = (η F).app X ≫ f := by
simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem μ_naturality {m n : M} {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [F.LaxMonoidal] :
(F.obj n).map ((F.obj m).map f) ≫ (μ F m n).app Y = (μ F m n).app X ≫ (F.obj _).map f :=
(μ F m n).naturality f
-- This is a simp lemma in the reverse direction via `NatTrans.naturality`.
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_naturality {m n : M} {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [F.OplaxMonoidal]:
(δ F m n).app X ≫ (F.obj n).map ((F.obj m).map f) =
(F.obj _).map f ≫ (δ F m n).app Y := by simp
-- This is not a simp lemma since it could be proved by the lemmas later.
@[reassoc]
theorem μ_naturality₂ {m n m' n' : M} (f : m ⟶ m') (g : n ⟶ n') (X : C) [F.LaxMonoidal] :
(F.map g).app ((F.obj m).obj X) ≫ (F.obj n').map ((F.map f).app X) ≫ (μ F m' n').app X =
(μ F m n).app X ≫ (F.map (f ⊗ g)).app X := by
have := congr_app (μ_natural F f g) X
dsimp at this
simpa using this
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem μ_naturalityₗ {m n m' : M} (f : m ⟶ m') (X : C) [F.LaxMonoidal]:
(F.obj n).map ((F.map f).app X) ≫ (μ F m' n).app X =
(μ F m n).app X ≫ (F.map (f ▷ n)).app X := by
rw [← tensorHom_id, ← μ_naturality₂ F f (𝟙 n) X]
simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem μ_naturalityᵣ {m n n' : M} (g : n ⟶ n') (X : C) [F.LaxMonoidal] :
(F.map g).app ((F.obj m).obj X) ≫ (μ F m n').app X =
(μ F m n).app X ≫ (F.map (m ◁ g)).app X := by
rw [← id_tensorHom, ← μ_naturality₂ F (𝟙 m) g X]
simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem δ_naturalityₗ {m n m' : M} (f : m ⟶ m') (X : C) [F.OplaxMonoidal] :
(δ F m n).app X ≫ (F.obj n).map ((F.map f).app X) =
(F.map (f ▷ n)).app X ≫ (δ F m' n).app X :=
congr_app (δ_natural_left F f n) X
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem δ_naturalityᵣ {m n n' : M} (g : n ⟶ n') (X : C) [F.OplaxMonoidal]:
(δ F m n).app X ≫ (F.map g).app ((F.obj m).obj X) =
(F.map (m ◁ g)).app X ≫ (δ F m n').app X :=
congr_app (δ_natural_right F m g) X
@[reassoc]
theorem left_unitality_app (n : M) (X : C) [F.LaxMonoidal]:
(F.obj n).map ((ε F).app X) ≫ (μ F (𝟙_ M) n).app X ≫ (F.map (λ_ n).hom).app X = 𝟙 _ :=
congr_app (left_unitality F n).symm X
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem obj_ε_app (n : M) (X : C) [F.Monoidal]:
(F.obj n).map ((ε F).app X) = (F.map (λ_ n).inv).app X ≫ (δ F (𝟙_ M) n).app X := by
rw [map_leftUnitor_inv]
dsimp
simp only [Category.id_comp, Category.assoc, μ_δ_app, endofunctorMonoidalCategory_tensorObj_obj,
Category.comp_id]
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem obj_η_app (n : M) (X : C) [F.Monoidal] :
(F.obj n).map ((η F).app X) = (μ F (𝟙_ M) n).app X ≫ (F.map (λ_ n).hom).app X := by
rw [← cancel_mono ((F.obj n).map ((ε F).app X)), ← Functor.map_comp]
simp
@[reassoc]
theorem right_unitality_app (n : M) (X : C) [F.Monoidal] :
(ε F).app ((F.obj n).obj X) ≫ (μ F n (𝟙_ M)).app X ≫ (F.map (ρ_ n).hom).app X = 𝟙 _ :=
congr_app (Functor.LaxMonoidal.right_unitality F n).symm X
@[simp]
theorem ε_app_obj (n : M) (X : C) [F.Monoidal] :
| (ε F).app ((F.obj n).obj X) = (F.map (ρ_ n).inv).app X ≫ (δ F n (𝟙_ M)).app X := by
rw [map_rightUnitor_inv]
dsimp
simp only [Category.id_comp, Category.assoc, μ_δ_app,
endofunctorMonoidalCategory_tensorObj_obj, Category.comp_id]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/End.lean | 218 | 222 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Hull
/-!
# Extreme sets
This file defines extreme sets and extreme points for sets in a module.
An extreme set of `A` is a subset of `A` that is as far as it can get in any outward direction: If
point `x` is in it and point `y ∈ A`, then the line passing through `x` and `y` leaves `A` at `x`.
This is an analytic notion of "being on the side of". It is weaker than being exposed (see
`IsExposed.isExtreme`).
## Main declarations
* `IsExtreme 𝕜 A B`: States that `B` is an extreme set of `A` (in the literature, `A` is often
implicit).
* `Set.extremePoints 𝕜 A`: Set of extreme points of `A` (corresponding to extreme singletons).
* `Convex.mem_extremePoints_iff_convex_diff`: A useful equivalent condition to being an extreme
point: `x` is an extreme point iff `A \ {x}` is convex.
## Implementation notes
The exact definition of extremeness has been carefully chosen so as to make as many lemmas
unconditional (in particular, the Krein-Milman theorem doesn't need the set to be convex!).
In practice, `A` is often assumed to be a convex set.
## References
See chapter 8 of [Barry Simon, *Convexity*][simon2011]
## TODO
Prove lemmas relating extreme sets and points to the intrinsic frontier.
-/
open Function Set Affine
variable {𝕜 E F ι : Type*} {M : ι → Type*}
section SMul
variable (𝕜) [Semiring 𝕜] [PartialOrder 𝕜] [AddCommMonoid E] [SMul 𝕜 E]
/-- A set `B` is an extreme subset of `A` if `B ⊆ A` and all points of `B` only belong to open
segments whose ends are in `B`. -/
def IsExtreme (A B : Set E) : Prop :=
B ⊆ A ∧ ∀ ⦃x₁⦄, x₁ ∈ A → ∀ ⦃x₂⦄, x₂ ∈ A → ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ B → x ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x₁ x₂ → x₁ ∈ B ∧ x₂ ∈ B
/-- A point `x` is an extreme point of a set `A` if `x` belongs to no open segment with ends in
`A`, except for the obvious `openSegment x x`.
In order to prove that `x` is an extreme point of `A`,
it is convenient to use `mem_extremePoints_iff_left` to avoid repeating arguments twice. -/
def Set.extremePoints (A : Set E) : Set E :=
{ x ∈ A | ∀ ⦃x₁⦄, x₁ ∈ A → ∀ ⦃x₂⦄, x₂ ∈ A → x ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x₁ x₂ → x₁ = x ∧ x₂ = x }
@[refl]
protected theorem IsExtreme.refl (A : Set E) : IsExtreme 𝕜 A A :=
⟨Subset.rfl, fun _ hx₁A _ hx₂A _ _ _ ↦ ⟨hx₁A, hx₂A⟩⟩
variable {𝕜} {A B C : Set E} {x : E}
protected theorem IsExtreme.rfl : IsExtreme 𝕜 A A :=
IsExtreme.refl 𝕜 A
@[trans]
protected theorem IsExtreme.trans (hAB : IsExtreme 𝕜 A B) (hBC : IsExtreme 𝕜 B C) :
IsExtreme 𝕜 A C := by
refine ⟨Subset.trans hBC.1 hAB.1, fun x₁ hx₁A x₂ hx₂A x hxC hx ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨hx₁B, hx₂B⟩ := hAB.2 hx₁A hx₂A (hBC.1 hxC) hx
exact hBC.2 hx₁B hx₂B hxC hx
protected theorem IsExtreme.antisymm : AntiSymmetric (IsExtreme 𝕜 : Set E → Set E → Prop) :=
fun _ _ hAB hBA ↦ Subset.antisymm hBA.1 hAB.1
instance : IsPartialOrder (Set E) (IsExtreme 𝕜) where
refl := IsExtreme.refl 𝕜
trans _ _ _ := IsExtreme.trans
antisymm := IsExtreme.antisymm
theorem IsExtreme.inter (hAB : IsExtreme 𝕜 A B) (hAC : IsExtreme 𝕜 A C) :
IsExtreme 𝕜 A (B ∩ C) := by
use Subset.trans inter_subset_left hAB.1
rintro x₁ hx₁A x₂ hx₂A x ⟨hxB, hxC⟩ hx
obtain ⟨hx₁B, hx₂B⟩ := hAB.2 hx₁A hx₂A hxB hx
obtain ⟨hx₁C, hx₂C⟩ := hAC.2 hx₁A hx₂A hxC hx
exact ⟨⟨hx₁B, hx₁C⟩, hx₂B, hx₂C⟩
protected theorem IsExtreme.mono (hAC : IsExtreme 𝕜 A C) (hBA : B ⊆ A) (hCB : C ⊆ B) :
IsExtreme 𝕜 B C :=
⟨hCB, fun _ hx₁B _ hx₂B _ hxC hx ↦ hAC.2 (hBA hx₁B) (hBA hx₂B) hxC hx⟩
theorem isExtreme_iInter {ι : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] {F : ι → Set E}
(hAF : ∀ i : ι, IsExtreme 𝕜 A (F i)) : IsExtreme 𝕜 A (⋂ i : ι, F i) := by
obtain i := Classical.arbitrary ι
refine ⟨iInter_subset_of_subset i (hAF i).1, fun x₁ hx₁A x₂ hx₂A x hxF hx ↦ ?_⟩
simp_rw [mem_iInter] at hxF ⊢
have h := fun i ↦ (hAF i).2 hx₁A hx₂A (hxF i) hx
exact ⟨fun i ↦ (h i).1, fun i ↦ (h i).2⟩
theorem isExtreme_biInter {F : Set (Set E)} (hF : F.Nonempty) (hA : ∀ B ∈ F, IsExtreme 𝕜 A B) :
IsExtreme 𝕜 A (⋂ B ∈ F, B) := by
haveI := hF.to_subtype
simpa only [iInter_subtype] using isExtreme_iInter fun i : F ↦ hA _ i.2
theorem isExtreme_sInter {F : Set (Set E)} (hF : F.Nonempty) (hAF : ∀ B ∈ F, IsExtreme 𝕜 A B) :
IsExtreme 𝕜 A (⋂₀ F) := by simpa [sInter_eq_biInter] using isExtreme_biInter hF hAF
theorem mem_extremePoints : x ∈ A.extremePoints 𝕜 ↔
x ∈ A ∧ ∀ᵉ (x₁ ∈ A) (x₂ ∈ A), x ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x₁ x₂ → x₁ = x ∧ x₂ = x :=
Iff.rfl
/-- In order to prove that a point `x` is an extreme point of a set `A`,
it suffices to show that `x ∈ A`
and for any `x₁`, `x₂` such that `x` belongs to the open segment `(x₁, x₂)`, we have `x₁ = x`.
The definition of `extremePoints` also requires `x₂ = x`, but this condition is redundant. -/
theorem mem_extremePoints_iff_left : x ∈ A.extremePoints 𝕜 ↔
x ∈ A ∧ ∀ x₁ ∈ A, ∀ x₂ ∈ A, x ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x₁ x₂ → x₁ = x := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.1, fun x₁ hx₁ x₂ hx₂ hx ↦ (h.2 hx₁ hx₂ hx).1⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨hxA, Hx⟩
use hxA
refine fun x₁ hx₁ x₂ hx₂ hx ↦ ⟨Hx x₁ hx₁ x₂ hx₂ hx, Hx x₂ hx₂ x₁ hx₁ ?_⟩
rwa [openSegment_symm]
/-- x is an extreme point to A iff {x} is an extreme set of A. -/
@[simp] lemma isExtreme_singleton : IsExtreme 𝕜 A {x} ↔ x ∈ A.extremePoints 𝕜 := by
refine ⟨fun hx ↦ ⟨singleton_subset_iff.1 hx.1, fun x₁ hx₁ x₂ hx₂ ↦ hx.2 hx₁ hx₂ rfl⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨hxA, hAx⟩
use singleton_subset_iff.2 hxA
rintro x₁ hx₁A x₂ hx₂A y (rfl : y = x)
exact hAx hx₁A hx₂A
alias ⟨IsExtreme.mem_extremePoints, _⟩ := isExtreme_singleton
theorem extremePoints_subset : A.extremePoints 𝕜 ⊆ A :=
fun _ hx ↦ hx.1
@[simp]
theorem extremePoints_empty : (∅ : Set E).extremePoints 𝕜 = ∅ :=
subset_empty_iff.1 extremePoints_subset
@[simp]
theorem extremePoints_singleton : ({x} : Set E).extremePoints 𝕜 = {x} :=
extremePoints_subset.antisymm <|
singleton_subset_iff.2 ⟨mem_singleton x, fun _ hx₁ _ hx₂ _ ↦ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩⟩
theorem inter_extremePoints_subset_extremePoints_of_subset (hBA : B ⊆ A) :
B ∩ A.extremePoints 𝕜 ⊆ B.extremePoints 𝕜 :=
fun _ ⟨hxB, hxA⟩ ↦ ⟨hxB, fun _ hx₁ _ hx₂ hx ↦ hxA.2 (hBA hx₁) (hBA hx₂) hx⟩
theorem IsExtreme.extremePoints_subset_extremePoints (hAB : IsExtreme 𝕜 A B) :
B.extremePoints 𝕜 ⊆ A.extremePoints 𝕜 :=
fun _ ↦ by simpa only [← isExtreme_singleton] using hAB.trans
theorem IsExtreme.extremePoints_eq (hAB : IsExtreme 𝕜 A B) :
B.extremePoints 𝕜 = B ∩ A.extremePoints 𝕜 :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ hx ↦ ⟨hx.1, hAB.extremePoints_subset_extremePoints hx⟩)
(inter_extremePoints_subset_extremePoints_of_subset hAB.1)
end SMul
section OrderedSemiring
variable [Semiring 𝕜] [PartialOrder 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup F] [∀ i, AddCommGroup (M i)]
[Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 F] [∀ i, Module 𝕜 (M i)] {A B : Set E}
theorem IsExtreme.convex_diff [IsOrderedRing 𝕜] (hA : Convex 𝕜 A) (hAB : IsExtreme 𝕜 A B) :
Convex 𝕜 (A \ B) :=
convex_iff_openSegment_subset.2 fun _ ⟨hx₁A, hx₁B⟩ _ ⟨hx₂A, _⟩ _ hx ↦
⟨hA.openSegment_subset hx₁A hx₂A hx, fun hxB ↦ hx₁B (hAB.2 hx₁A hx₂A hxB hx).1⟩
@[simp]
theorem extremePoints_prod (s : Set E) (t : Set F) :
(s ×ˢ t).extremePoints 𝕜 = s.extremePoints 𝕜 ×ˢ t.extremePoints 𝕜 := by
ext
refine (and_congr_right fun hx ↦ ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩).trans and_and_and_comm
constructor
· rintro x₁ hx₁ x₂ hx₂ hx_fst
refine (h (mk_mem_prod hx₁ hx.2) (mk_mem_prod hx₂ hx.2) ?_).imp (congr_arg Prod.fst)
(congr_arg Prod.fst)
rw [← Prod.image_mk_openSegment_left]
exact ⟨_, hx_fst, rfl⟩
| · rintro x₁ hx₁ x₂ hx₂ hx_snd
refine (h (mk_mem_prod hx.1 hx₁) (mk_mem_prod hx.1 hx₂) ?_).imp (congr_arg Prod.snd)
(congr_arg Prod.snd)
rw [← Prod.image_mk_openSegment_right]
exact ⟨_, hx_snd, rfl⟩
· rintro x₁ hx₁ x₂ hx₂ ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, hx'⟩
simp_rw [Prod.ext_iff]
exact and_and_and_comm.1
⟨h.1 hx₁.1 hx₂.1 ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, congr_arg Prod.fst hx'⟩,
h.2 hx₁.2 hx₂.2 ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, congr_arg Prod.snd hx'⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem extremePoints_pi (s : ∀ i, Set (M i)) :
(univ.pi s).extremePoints 𝕜 = univ.pi fun i ↦ (s i).extremePoints 𝕜 := by
classical
ext x
simp only [mem_extremePoints, mem_pi, mem_univ, true_imp_iff, @forall_and ι]
refine and_congr_right fun hx ↦ ⟨fun h i ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rintro x₁ hx₁ x₂ hx₂ hi
refine (h (update x i x₁) ?_ (update x i x₂) ?_ ?_).imp (fun h₁ ↦ by rw [← h₁, update_self])
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Extreme.lean | 190 | 209 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ComplexShape
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Subobject.Limits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.GradedObject
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Basic
/-!
# Homological complexes.
A `HomologicalComplex V c` with a "shape" controlled by `c : ComplexShape ι`
has chain groups `X i` (objects in `V`) indexed by `i : ι`,
and a differential `d i j` whenever `c.Rel i j`.
We in fact ask for differentials `d i j` for all `i j : ι`,
but have a field `shape` requiring that these are zero when not allowed by `c`.
This avoids a lot of dependent type theory hell!
The composite of any two differentials `d i j ≫ d j k` must be zero.
We provide `ChainComplex V α` for
`α`-indexed chain complexes in which `d i j ≠ 0` only if `j + 1 = i`,
and similarly `CochainComplex V α`, with `i = j + 1`.
There is a category structure, where morphisms are chain maps.
For `C : HomologicalComplex V c`, we define `C.xNext i`, which is either `C.X j` for some
arbitrarily chosen `j` such that `c.r i j`, or `C.X i` if there is no such `j`.
Similarly we have `C.xPrev j`.
Defined in terms of these we have `C.dFrom i : C.X i ⟶ C.xNext i` and
`C.dTo j : C.xPrev j ⟶ C.X j`, which are either defined as `C.d i j`, or zero, as needed.
-/
universe v u
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {ι : Type*}
variable (V : Type u) [Category.{v} V] [HasZeroMorphisms V]
/-- A `HomologicalComplex V c` with a "shape" controlled by `c : ComplexShape ι`
has chain groups `X i` (objects in `V`) indexed by `i : ι`,
and a differential `d i j` whenever `c.Rel i j`.
We in fact ask for differentials `d i j` for all `i j : ι`,
but have a field `shape` requiring that these are zero when not allowed by `c`.
This avoids a lot of dependent type theory hell!
The composite of any two differentials `d i j ≫ d j k` must be zero.
-/
structure HomologicalComplex (c : ComplexShape ι) where
X : ι → V
d : ∀ i j, X i ⟶ X j
shape : ∀ i j, ¬c.Rel i j → d i j = 0 := by aesop_cat
d_comp_d' : ∀ i j k, c.Rel i j → c.Rel j k → d i j ≫ d j k = 0 := by aesop_cat
namespace HomologicalComplex
attribute [simp] shape
variable {V} {c : ComplexShape ι}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem d_comp_d (C : HomologicalComplex V c) (i j k : ι) : C.d i j ≫ C.d j k = 0 := by
by_cases hij : c.Rel i j
· by_cases hjk : c.Rel j k
· exact C.d_comp_d' i j k hij hjk
· rw [C.shape j k hjk, comp_zero]
· rw [C.shape i j hij, zero_comp]
theorem ext {C₁ C₂ : HomologicalComplex V c} (h_X : C₁.X = C₂.X)
(h_d :
∀ i j : ι,
c.Rel i j → C₁.d i j ≫ eqToHom (congr_fun h_X j) = eqToHom (congr_fun h_X i) ≫ C₂.d i j) :
C₁ = C₂ := by
obtain ⟨X₁, d₁, s₁, h₁⟩ := C₁
obtain ⟨X₂, d₂, s₂, h₂⟩ := C₂
dsimp at h_X
subst h_X
simp only [mk.injEq, heq_eq_eq, true_and]
ext i j
by_cases hij : c.Rel i j
· simpa only [comp_id, id_comp, eqToHom_refl] using h_d i j hij
· rw [s₁ i j hij, s₂ i j hij]
/-- The obvious isomorphism `K.X p ≅ K.X q` when `p = q`. -/
def XIsoOfEq (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p q : ι} (h : p = q) : K.X p ≅ K.X q :=
eqToIso (by rw [h])
@[simp]
lemma XIsoOfEq_rfl (K : HomologicalComplex V c) (p : ι) :
K.XIsoOfEq (rfl : p = p) = Iso.refl _ := rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma XIsoOfEq_hom_comp_XIsoOfEq_hom (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₁ p₂ p₃ : ι}
(h₁₂ : p₁ = p₂) (h₂₃ : p₂ = p₃) :
(K.XIsoOfEq h₁₂).hom ≫ (K.XIsoOfEq h₂₃).hom = (K.XIsoOfEq (h₁₂.trans h₂₃)).hom := by
dsimp [XIsoOfEq]
simp only [eqToHom_trans]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma XIsoOfEq_hom_comp_XIsoOfEq_inv (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₁ p₂ p₃ : ι}
(h₁₂ : p₁ = p₂) (h₃₂ : p₃ = p₂) :
(K.XIsoOfEq h₁₂).hom ≫ (K.XIsoOfEq h₃₂).inv = (K.XIsoOfEq (h₁₂.trans h₃₂.symm)).hom := by
dsimp [XIsoOfEq]
simp only [eqToHom_trans]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma XIsoOfEq_inv_comp_XIsoOfEq_hom (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₁ p₂ p₃ : ι}
(h₂₁ : p₂ = p₁) (h₂₃ : p₂ = p₃) :
(K.XIsoOfEq h₂₁).inv ≫ (K.XIsoOfEq h₂₃).hom = (K.XIsoOfEq (h₂₁.symm.trans h₂₃)).hom := by
dsimp [XIsoOfEq]
simp only [eqToHom_trans]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma XIsoOfEq_inv_comp_XIsoOfEq_inv (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₁ p₂ p₃ : ι}
(h₂₁ : p₂ = p₁) (h₃₂ : p₃ = p₂) :
(K.XIsoOfEq h₂₁).inv ≫ (K.XIsoOfEq h₃₂).inv = (K.XIsoOfEq (h₃₂.trans h₂₁).symm).hom := by
dsimp [XIsoOfEq]
simp only [eqToHom_trans]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma XIsoOfEq_hom_comp_d (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₁ p₂ : ι} (h : p₁ = p₂) (p₃ : ι) :
(K.XIsoOfEq h).hom ≫ K.d p₂ p₃ = K.d p₁ p₃ := by subst h; simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma XIsoOfEq_inv_comp_d (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₂ p₁ : ι} (h : p₂ = p₁) (p₃ : ι) :
(K.XIsoOfEq h).inv ≫ K.d p₂ p₃ = K.d p₁ p₃ := by subst h; simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma d_comp_XIsoOfEq_hom (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₂ p₃ : ι} (h : p₂ = p₃) (p₁ : ι) :
K.d p₁ p₂ ≫ (K.XIsoOfEq h).hom = K.d p₁ p₃ := by subst h; simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma d_comp_XIsoOfEq_inv (K : HomologicalComplex V c) {p₂ p₃ : ι} (h : p₃ = p₂) (p₁ : ι) :
K.d p₁ p₂ ≫ (K.XIsoOfEq h).inv = K.d p₁ p₃ := by subst h; simp
end HomologicalComplex
/-- An `α`-indexed chain complex is a `HomologicalComplex`
in which `d i j ≠ 0` only if `j + 1 = i`.
-/
abbrev ChainComplex (α : Type*) [AddRightCancelSemigroup α] [One α] : Type _ :=
HomologicalComplex V (ComplexShape.down α)
/-- An `α`-indexed cochain complex is a `HomologicalComplex`
in which `d i j ≠ 0` only if `i + 1 = j`.
-/
abbrev CochainComplex (α : Type*) [AddRightCancelSemigroup α] [One α] : Type _ :=
HomologicalComplex V (ComplexShape.up α)
namespace ChainComplex
@[simp]
theorem prev (α : Type*) [AddRightCancelSemigroup α] [One α] (i : α) :
(ComplexShape.down α).prev i = i + 1 :=
(ComplexShape.down α).prev_eq' rfl
@[simp]
theorem next (α : Type*) [AddGroup α] [One α] (i : α) : (ComplexShape.down α).next i = i - 1 :=
(ComplexShape.down α).next_eq' <| sub_add_cancel _ _
@[simp]
theorem next_nat_zero : (ComplexShape.down ℕ).next 0 = 0 := by
classical
refine dif_neg ?_
push_neg
intro
apply Nat.noConfusion
@[simp]
theorem next_nat_succ (i : ℕ) : (ComplexShape.down ℕ).next (i + 1) = i :=
(ComplexShape.down ℕ).next_eq' rfl
end ChainComplex
namespace CochainComplex
@[simp]
theorem prev (α : Type*) [AddGroup α] [One α] (i : α) : (ComplexShape.up α).prev i = i - 1 :=
(ComplexShape.up α).prev_eq' <| sub_add_cancel _ _
@[simp]
theorem next (α : Type*) [AddRightCancelSemigroup α] [One α] (i : α) :
(ComplexShape.up α).next i = i + 1 :=
(ComplexShape.up α).next_eq' rfl
@[simp]
theorem prev_nat_zero : (ComplexShape.up ℕ).prev 0 = 0 := by
classical
refine dif_neg ?_
push_neg
intro
apply Nat.noConfusion
@[simp]
theorem prev_nat_succ (i : ℕ) : (ComplexShape.up ℕ).prev (i + 1) = i :=
(ComplexShape.up ℕ).prev_eq' rfl
end CochainComplex
namespace HomologicalComplex
variable {V}
variable {c : ComplexShape ι} (C : HomologicalComplex V c)
/-- A morphism of homological complexes consists of maps between the chain groups,
commuting with the differentials.
-/
@[ext]
structure Hom (A B : HomologicalComplex V c) where
f : ∀ i, A.X i ⟶ B.X i
comm' : ∀ i j, c.Rel i j → f i ≫ B.d i j = A.d i j ≫ f j := by aesop_cat
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem Hom.comm {A B : HomologicalComplex V c} (f : A.Hom B) (i j : ι) :
f.f i ≫ B.d i j = A.d i j ≫ f.f j := by
by_cases hij : c.Rel i j
· exact f.comm' i j hij
· rw [A.shape i j hij, B.shape i j hij, comp_zero, zero_comp]
instance (A B : HomologicalComplex V c) : Inhabited (Hom A B) :=
⟨{ f := fun _ => 0 }⟩
/-- Identity chain map. -/
def id (A : HomologicalComplex V c) : Hom A A where f _ := 𝟙 _
/-- Composition of chain maps. -/
def comp (A B C : HomologicalComplex V c) (φ : Hom A B) (ψ : Hom B C) : Hom A C where
f i := φ.f i ≫ ψ.f i
section
attribute [local simp] id comp
instance : Category (HomologicalComplex V c) where
Hom := Hom
id := id
comp := comp _ _ _
end
@[ext]
lemma hom_ext {C D : HomologicalComplex V c} (f g : C ⟶ D)
(h : ∀ i, f.f i = g.f i) : f = g := by
apply Hom.ext
funext
apply h
@[simp]
theorem id_f (C : HomologicalComplex V c) (i : ι) : Hom.f (𝟙 C) i = 𝟙 (C.X i) :=
rfl
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem comp_f {C₁ C₂ C₃ : HomologicalComplex V c} (f : C₁ ⟶ C₂) (g : C₂ ⟶ C₃) (i : ι) :
(f ≫ g).f i = f.f i ≫ g.f i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem eqToHom_f {C₁ C₂ : HomologicalComplex V c} (h : C₁ = C₂) (n : ι) :
HomologicalComplex.Hom.f (eqToHom h) n =
eqToHom (congr_fun (congr_arg HomologicalComplex.X h) n) := by
subst h
rfl
-- We'll use this later to show that `HomologicalComplex V c` is preadditive when `V` is.
theorem hom_f_injective {C₁ C₂ : HomologicalComplex V c} :
Function.Injective fun f : Hom C₁ C₂ => f.f := by aesop_cat
instance (X Y : HomologicalComplex V c) : Zero (X ⟶ Y) :=
⟨{ f := fun _ => 0}⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_f (C D : HomologicalComplex V c) (i : ι) : (0 : C ⟶ D).f i = 0 :=
rfl
instance : HasZeroMorphisms (HomologicalComplex V c) where
open ZeroObject
/-- The zero complex -/
noncomputable def zero [HasZeroObject V] : HomologicalComplex V c where
X _ := 0
d _ _ := 0
theorem isZero_zero [HasZeroObject V] : IsZero (zero : HomologicalComplex V c) := by
refine ⟨fun X => ⟨⟨⟨0⟩, fun f => ?_⟩⟩, fun X => ⟨⟨⟨0⟩, fun f => ?_⟩⟩⟩
all_goals
ext
dsimp only [zero]
subsingleton
instance [HasZeroObject V] : HasZeroObject (HomologicalComplex V c) :=
⟨⟨zero, isZero_zero⟩⟩
noncomputable instance [HasZeroObject V] : Inhabited (HomologicalComplex V c) :=
⟨zero⟩
theorem congr_hom {C D : HomologicalComplex V c} {f g : C ⟶ D} (w : f = g) (i : ι) :
f.f i = g.f i :=
congr_fun (congr_arg Hom.f w) i
lemma mono_of_mono_f {K L : HomologicalComplex V c} (φ : K ⟶ L)
(hφ : ∀ i, Mono (φ.f i)) : Mono φ where
right_cancellation g h eq := by
ext i
rw [← cancel_mono (φ.f i)]
exact congr_hom eq i
lemma epi_of_epi_f {K L : HomologicalComplex V c} (φ : K ⟶ L)
(hφ : ∀ i, Epi (φ.f i)) : Epi φ where
left_cancellation g h eq := by
ext i
rw [← cancel_epi (φ.f i)]
exact congr_hom eq i
section
variable (V c)
/-- The functor picking out the `i`-th object of a complex. -/
@[simps]
def eval (i : ι) : HomologicalComplex V c ⥤ V where
obj C := C.X i
map f := f.f i
instance (i : ι) : (eval V c i).PreservesZeroMorphisms where
/-- The functor forgetting the differential in a complex, obtaining a graded object. -/
@[simps]
def forget : HomologicalComplex V c ⥤ GradedObject ι V where
obj C := C.X
map f := f.f
instance : (forget V c).Faithful where
map_injective h := by
ext i
exact congr_fun h i
/-- Forgetting the differentials than picking out the `i`-th object is the same as
just picking out the `i`-th object. -/
@[simps!]
def forgetEval (i : ι) : forget V c ⋙ GradedObject.eval i ≅ eval V c i :=
NatIso.ofComponents fun _ => Iso.refl _
end
noncomputable section
@[reassoc]
lemma XIsoOfEq_hom_naturality {K L : HomologicalComplex V c} (φ : K ⟶ L) {n n' : ι} (h : n = n') :
φ.f n ≫ (L.XIsoOfEq h).hom = (K.XIsoOfEq h).hom ≫ φ.f n' := by subst h; simp
@[reassoc]
lemma XIsoOfEq_inv_naturality {K L : HomologicalComplex V c} (φ : K ⟶ L) {n n' : ι} (h : n = n') :
φ.f n' ≫ (L.XIsoOfEq h).inv = (K.XIsoOfEq h).inv ≫ φ.f n := by subst h; simp
-- Porting note: removed @[simp] as the linter complained
/-- If `C.d i j` and `C.d i j'` are both allowed, then we must have `j = j'`,
and so the differentials only differ by an `eqToHom`.
-/
theorem d_comp_eqToHom {i j j' : ι} (rij : c.Rel i j) (rij' : c.Rel i j') :
C.d i j' ≫ eqToHom (congr_arg C.X (c.next_eq rij' rij)) = C.d i j := by
obtain rfl := c.next_eq rij rij'
simp only [eqToHom_refl, comp_id]
-- Porting note: removed @[simp] as the linter complained
/-- If `C.d i j` and `C.d i' j` are both allowed, then we must have `i = i'`,
and so the differentials only differ by an `eqToHom`.
-/
theorem eqToHom_comp_d {i i' j : ι} (rij : c.Rel i j) (rij' : c.Rel i' j) :
eqToHom (congr_arg C.X (c.prev_eq rij rij')) ≫ C.d i' j = C.d i j := by
obtain rfl := c.prev_eq rij rij'
simp only [eqToHom_refl, id_comp]
theorem kernel_eq_kernel [HasKernels V] {i j j' : ι} (r : c.Rel i j) (r' : c.Rel i j') :
kernelSubobject (C.d i j) = kernelSubobject (C.d i j') := by
rw [← d_comp_eqToHom C r r']
apply kernelSubobject_comp_mono
theorem image_eq_image [HasImages V] [HasEqualizers V] {i i' j : ι} (r : c.Rel i j)
(r' : c.Rel i' j) : imageSubobject (C.d i j) = imageSubobject (C.d i' j) := by
rw [← eqToHom_comp_d C r r']
apply imageSubobject_iso_comp
section
/-- Either `C.X i`, if there is some `i` with `c.Rel i j`, or `C.X j`. -/
abbrev xPrev (j : ι) : V :=
C.X (c.prev j)
/-- If `c.Rel i j`, then `C.xPrev j` is isomorphic to `C.X i`. -/
def xPrevIso {i j : ι} (r : c.Rel i j) : C.xPrev j ≅ C.X i :=
eqToIso <| by rw [← c.prev_eq' r]
/-- If there is no `i` so `c.Rel i j`, then `C.xPrev j` is isomorphic to `C.X j`. -/
def xPrevIsoSelf {j : ι} (h : ¬c.Rel (c.prev j) j) : C.xPrev j ≅ C.X j :=
eqToIso <|
congr_arg C.X
(by
dsimp [ComplexShape.prev]
rw [dif_neg]
push_neg; intro i hi
have : c.prev j = i := c.prev_eq' hi
rw [this] at h; contradiction)
/-- Either `C.X j`, if there is some `j` with `c.rel i j`, or `C.X i`. -/
abbrev xNext (i : ι) : V :=
C.X (c.next i)
/-- If `c.Rel i j`, then `C.xNext i` is isomorphic to `C.X j`. -/
def xNextIso {i j : ι} (r : c.Rel i j) : C.xNext i ≅ C.X j :=
eqToIso <| by rw [← c.next_eq' r]
/-- If there is no `j` so `c.Rel i j`, then `C.xNext i` is isomorphic to `C.X i`. -/
def xNextIsoSelf {i : ι} (h : ¬c.Rel i (c.next i)) : C.xNext i ≅ C.X i :=
eqToIso <|
congr_arg C.X
(by
dsimp [ComplexShape.next]
rw [dif_neg]; rintro ⟨j, hj⟩
have : c.next i = j := c.next_eq' hj
rw [this] at h; contradiction)
/-- The differential mapping into `C.X j`, or zero if there isn't one.
-/
abbrev dTo (j : ι) : C.xPrev j ⟶ C.X j :=
C.d (c.prev j) j
/-- The differential mapping out of `C.X i`, or zero if there isn't one.
-/
abbrev dFrom (i : ι) : C.X i ⟶ C.xNext i :=
C.d i (c.next i)
theorem dTo_eq {i j : ι} (r : c.Rel i j) : C.dTo j = (C.xPrevIso r).hom ≫ C.d i j := by
obtain rfl := c.prev_eq' r
exact (Category.id_comp _).symm
@[simp]
theorem dTo_eq_zero {j : ι} (h : ¬c.Rel (c.prev j) j) : C.dTo j = 0 :=
C.shape _ _ h
theorem dFrom_eq {i j : ι} (r : c.Rel i j) : C.dFrom i = C.d i j ≫ (C.xNextIso r).inv := by
obtain rfl := c.next_eq' r
exact (Category.comp_id _).symm
@[simp]
theorem dFrom_eq_zero {i : ι} (h : ¬c.Rel i (c.next i)) : C.dFrom i = 0 :=
C.shape _ _ h
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem xPrevIso_comp_dTo {i j : ι} (r : c.Rel i j) : (C.xPrevIso r).inv ≫ C.dTo j = C.d i j := by
simp [C.dTo_eq r]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem xPrevIsoSelf_comp_dTo {j : ι} (h : ¬c.Rel (c.prev j) j) :
(C.xPrevIsoSelf h).inv ≫ C.dTo j = 0 := by simp [h]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem dFrom_comp_xNextIso {i j : ι} (r : c.Rel i j) :
C.dFrom i ≫ (C.xNextIso r).hom = C.d i j := by
simp [C.dFrom_eq r]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem dFrom_comp_xNextIsoSelf {i : ι} (h : ¬c.Rel i (c.next i)) :
C.dFrom i ≫ (C.xNextIsoSelf h).hom = 0 := by simp [h]
-- This is not a simp lemma; the LHS already simplifies.
theorem dTo_comp_dFrom (j : ι) : C.dTo j ≫ C.dFrom j = 0 :=
C.d_comp_d _ _ _
theorem kernel_from_eq_kernel [HasKernels V] {i j : ι} (r : c.Rel i j) :
kernelSubobject (C.dFrom i) = kernelSubobject (C.d i j) := by
rw [C.dFrom_eq r]
apply kernelSubobject_comp_mono
theorem image_to_eq_image [HasImages V] [HasEqualizers V] {i j : ι} (r : c.Rel i j) :
imageSubobject (C.dTo j) = imageSubobject (C.d i j) := by
rw [C.dTo_eq r]
apply imageSubobject_iso_comp
end
namespace Hom
variable {C₁ C₂ C₃ : HomologicalComplex V c}
/-- The `i`-th component of an isomorphism of chain complexes. -/
@[simps!]
def isoApp (f : C₁ ≅ C₂) (i : ι) : C₁.X i ≅ C₂.X i :=
(eval V c i).mapIso f
/-- Construct an isomorphism of chain complexes from isomorphism of the objects
which commute with the differentials. -/
@[simps]
def isoOfComponents (f : ∀ i, C₁.X i ≅ C₂.X i)
(hf : ∀ i j, c.Rel i j → (f i).hom ≫ C₂.d i j = C₁.d i j ≫ (f j).hom := by aesop_cat) :
C₁ ≅ C₂ where
hom :=
{ f := fun i => (f i).hom
comm' := hf }
inv :=
{ f := fun i => (f i).inv
comm' := fun i j hij =>
calc
(f i).inv ≫ C₁.d i j = (f i).inv ≫ (C₁.d i j ≫ (f j).hom) ≫ (f j).inv := by simp
_ = (f i).inv ≫ ((f i).hom ≫ C₂.d i j) ≫ (f j).inv := by rw [hf i j hij]
_ = C₂.d i j ≫ (f j).inv := by simp }
hom_inv_id := by
ext i
exact (f i).hom_inv_id
inv_hom_id := by
ext i
exact (f i).inv_hom_id
@[simp]
theorem isoOfComponents_app (f : ∀ i, C₁.X i ≅ C₂.X i)
(hf : ∀ i j, c.Rel i j → (f i).hom ≫ C₂.d i j = C₁.d i j ≫ (f j).hom) (i : ι) :
isoApp (isoOfComponents f hf) i = f i := by
ext
simp
theorem isIso_of_components (f : C₁ ⟶ C₂) [∀ n : ι, IsIso (f.f n)] : IsIso f :=
(HomologicalComplex.Hom.isoOfComponents fun n => asIso (f.f n)).isIso_hom
/-! Lemmas relating chain maps and `dTo`/`dFrom`. -/
/-- `f.prev j` is `f.f i` if there is some `r i j`, and `f.f j` otherwise. -/
abbrev prev (f : Hom C₁ C₂) (j : ι) : C₁.xPrev j ⟶ C₂.xPrev j :=
f.f _
theorem prev_eq (f : Hom C₁ C₂) {i j : ι} (w : c.Rel i j) :
f.prev j = (C₁.xPrevIso w).hom ≫ f.f i ≫ (C₂.xPrevIso w).inv := by
obtain rfl := c.prev_eq' w
simp only [xPrevIso, eqToIso_refl, Iso.refl_hom, Iso.refl_inv, comp_id, id_comp]
/-- `f.next i` is `f.f j` if there is some `r i j`, and `f.f j` otherwise. -/
abbrev next (f : Hom C₁ C₂) (i : ι) : C₁.xNext i ⟶ C₂.xNext i :=
f.f _
theorem next_eq (f : Hom C₁ C₂) {i j : ι} (w : c.Rel i j) :
f.next i = (C₁.xNextIso w).hom ≫ f.f j ≫ (C₂.xNextIso w).inv := by
obtain rfl := c.next_eq' w
simp only [xNextIso, eqToIso_refl, Iso.refl_hom, Iso.refl_inv, comp_id, id_comp]
@[reassoc, elementwise]
theorem comm_from (f : Hom C₁ C₂) (i : ι) : f.f i ≫ C₂.dFrom i = C₁.dFrom i ≫ f.next i :=
f.comm _ _
attribute [simp] comm_from_apply
@[reassoc, elementwise]
theorem comm_to (f : Hom C₁ C₂) (j : ι) : f.prev j ≫ C₂.dTo j = C₁.dTo j ≫ f.f j :=
f.comm _ _
attribute [simp] comm_to_apply
/-- A morphism of chain complexes
induces a morphism of arrows of the differentials out of each object.
-/
def sqFrom (f : Hom C₁ C₂) (i : ι) : Arrow.mk (C₁.dFrom i) ⟶ Arrow.mk (C₂.dFrom i) :=
Arrow.homMk _ _ (f.comm_from i)
@[simp]
theorem sqFrom_left (f : Hom C₁ C₂) (i : ι) : (f.sqFrom i).left = f.f i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sqFrom_right (f : Hom C₁ C₂) (i : ι) : (f.sqFrom i).right = f.next i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sqFrom_id (C₁ : HomologicalComplex V c) (i : ι) : sqFrom (𝟙 C₁) i = 𝟙 _ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sqFrom_comp (f : C₁ ⟶ C₂) (g : C₂ ⟶ C₃) (i : ι) :
sqFrom (f ≫ g) i = sqFrom f i ≫ sqFrom g i :=
rfl
/-- A morphism of chain complexes
induces a morphism of arrows of the differentials into each object.
-/
def sqTo (f : Hom C₁ C₂) (j : ι) : Arrow.mk (C₁.dTo j) ⟶ Arrow.mk (C₂.dTo j) :=
Arrow.homMk _ _ (f.comm_to j)
@[simp]
theorem sqTo_left (f : Hom C₁ C₂) (j : ι) : (f.sqTo j).left = f.prev j :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sqTo_right (f : Hom C₁ C₂) (j : ι) : (f.sqTo j).right = f.f j :=
rfl
end Hom
end
end HomologicalComplex
namespace ChainComplex
section Of
variable {V} {α : Type*} [AddRightCancelSemigroup α] [One α] [DecidableEq α]
/-- Construct an `α`-indexed chain complex from a dependently-typed differential.
-/
def of (X : α → V) (d : ∀ n, X (n + 1) ⟶ X n) (sq : ∀ n, d (n + 1) ≫ d n = 0) : ChainComplex V α :=
{ X := X
d := fun i j => if h : i = j + 1 then eqToHom (by rw [h]) ≫ d j else 0
shape := fun i j w => by
dsimp
rw [dif_neg (Ne.symm w)]
d_comp_d' := fun i j k hij hjk => by
dsimp at hij hjk
substs hij hjk
simp only [eqToHom_refl, id_comp, dite_eq_ite, ite_true, sq] }
variable (X : α → V) (d : ∀ n, X (n + 1) ⟶ X n) (sq : ∀ n, d (n + 1) ≫ d n = 0)
@[simp]
theorem of_x (n : α) : (of X d sq).X n = X n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem of_d (j : α) : (of X d sq).d (j + 1) j = d j := by
dsimp [of]
rw [if_pos rfl, Category.id_comp]
theorem of_d_ne {i j : α} (h : i ≠ j + 1) : (of X d sq).d i j = 0 := by
dsimp [of]
rw [dif_neg h]
end Of
section OfHom
variable {V} {α : Type*} [AddRightCancelSemigroup α] [One α] [DecidableEq α]
variable (X : α → V) (d_X : ∀ n, X (n + 1) ⟶ X n) (sq_X : ∀ n, d_X (n + 1) ≫ d_X n = 0) (Y : α → V)
(d_Y : ∀ n, Y (n + 1) ⟶ Y n) (sq_Y : ∀ n, d_Y (n + 1) ≫ d_Y n = 0)
/-- A constructor for chain maps between `α`-indexed chain complexes built using `ChainComplex.of`,
from a dependently typed collection of morphisms.
-/
@[simps]
def ofHom (f : ∀ i : α, X i ⟶ Y i) (comm : ∀ i : α, f (i + 1) ≫ d_Y i = d_X i ≫ f i) :
of X d_X sq_X ⟶ of Y d_Y sq_Y :=
{ f
comm' := fun n m => by
by_cases h : n = m + 1
· subst h
simpa using comm m
· rw [of_d_ne X _ _ h, of_d_ne Y _ _ h]
simp }
end OfHom
section Mk
variable {V}
variable (X₀ X₁ X₂ : V) (d₀ : X₁ ⟶ X₀) (d₁ : X₂ ⟶ X₁) (s : d₁ ≫ d₀ = 0)
(succ : ∀ (S : ShortComplex V), Σ' (X₃ : V) (d₂ : X₃ ⟶ S.X₁), d₂ ≫ S.f = 0)
/-- Auxiliary definition for `mk`. -/
def mkAux : ℕ → ShortComplex V
| 0 => ShortComplex.mk _ _ s
| n + 1 => ShortComplex.mk _ _ (succ (mkAux n)).2.2
/-- An inductive constructor for `ℕ`-indexed chain complexes.
You provide explicitly the first two differentials,
then a function which takes two differentials and the fact they compose to zero,
and returns the next object, its differential, and the fact it composes appropriately to zero.
See also `mk'`, which only sees the previous differential in the inductive step.
-/
def mk : ChainComplex V ℕ :=
of (fun n => (mkAux X₀ X₁ X₂ d₀ d₁ s succ n).X₃) (fun n => (mkAux X₀ X₁ X₂ d₀ d₁ s succ n).g)
fun n => (mkAux X₀ X₁ X₂ d₀ d₁ s succ n).zero
@[simp]
theorem mk_X_0 : (mk X₀ X₁ X₂ d₀ d₁ s succ).X 0 = X₀ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_X_1 : (mk X₀ X₁ X₂ d₀ d₁ s succ).X 1 = X₁ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_X_2 : (mk X₀ X₁ X₂ d₀ d₁ s succ).X 2 = X₂ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_d_1_0 : (mk X₀ X₁ X₂ d₀ d₁ s succ).d 1 0 = d₀ := by
change ite (1 = 0 + 1) (𝟙 X₁ ≫ d₀) 0 = d₀
rw [if_pos rfl, Category.id_comp]
@[simp]
theorem mk_d_2_1 : (mk X₀ X₁ X₂ d₀ d₁ s succ).d 2 1 = d₁ := by
change ite (2 = 1 + 1) (𝟙 X₂ ≫ d₁) 0 = d₁
rw [if_pos rfl, Category.id_comp]
-- TODO simp lemmas for the inductive steps? It's not entirely clear that they are needed.
/-- A simpler inductive constructor for `ℕ`-indexed chain complexes.
You provide explicitly the first differential,
then a function which takes a differential,
and returns the next object, its differential, and the fact it composes appropriately to zero.
| -/
def mk' (X₀ X₁ : V) (d : X₁ ⟶ X₀)
(succ' : ∀ {X₀ X₁ : V} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₀), Σ' (X₂ : V) (d : X₂ ⟶ X₁), d ≫ f = 0) :
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/HomologicalComplex.lean | 717 | 719 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Alexander Bentkamp. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alexander Bentkamp, Yury Kudryashov, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module.OrderedSMul
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module.Synonym
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Pointwise.Set
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Star
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
import Mathlib.Tactic.NoncommRing
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.AffineSubspace.Defs
/-!
# Convex sets and functions in vector spaces
In a 𝕜-vector space, we define the following objects and properties.
* `Convex 𝕜 s`: A set `s` is convex if for any two points `x y ∈ s` it includes `segment 𝕜 x y`.
* `stdSimplex 𝕜 ι`: The standard simplex in `ι → 𝕜` (currently requires `Fintype ι`). It is the
intersection of the positive quadrant with the hyperplane `s.sum = 1`.
We also provide various equivalent versions of the definitions above, prove that some specific sets
are convex.
## TODO
Generalize all this file to affine spaces.
-/
variable {𝕜 E F β : Type*}
open LinearMap Set
open scoped Convex Pointwise
/-! ### Convexity of sets -/
section OrderedSemiring
variable [Semiring 𝕜] [PartialOrder 𝕜]
section AddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid E] [AddCommMonoid F]
section SMul
variable (𝕜) [SMul 𝕜 E] [SMul 𝕜 F] (s : Set E) {x : E}
/-- Convexity of sets. -/
def Convex : Prop :=
∀ ⦃x : E⦄, x ∈ s → StarConvex 𝕜 x s
variable {𝕜 s}
theorem Convex.starConvex (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) : StarConvex 𝕜 x s :=
hs hx
theorem convex_iff_segment_subset : Convex 𝕜 s ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → [x -[𝕜] y] ⊆ s :=
forall₂_congr fun _ _ => starConvex_iff_segment_subset
theorem Convex.segment_subset (h : Convex 𝕜 s) {x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) :
[x -[𝕜] y] ⊆ s :=
convex_iff_segment_subset.1 h hx hy
theorem Convex.openSegment_subset (h : Convex 𝕜 s) {x y : E} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) :
openSegment 𝕜 x y ⊆ s :=
(openSegment_subset_segment 𝕜 x y).trans (h.segment_subset hx hy)
/-- Alternative definition of set convexity, in terms of pointwise set operations. -/
theorem convex_iff_pointwise_add_subset :
Convex 𝕜 s ↔ ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → a + b = 1 → a • s + b • s ⊆ s :=
Iff.intro
(by
rintro hA a b ha hb hab w ⟨au, ⟨u, hu, rfl⟩, bv, ⟨v, hv, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
exact hA hu hv ha hb hab)
fun h _ hx _ hy _ _ ha hb hab => (h ha hb hab) (Set.add_mem_add ⟨_, hx, rfl⟩ ⟨_, hy, rfl⟩)
alias ⟨Convex.set_combo_subset, _⟩ := convex_iff_pointwise_add_subset
theorem convex_empty : Convex 𝕜 (∅ : Set E) := fun _ => False.elim
theorem convex_univ : Convex 𝕜 (Set.univ : Set E) := fun _ _ => starConvex_univ _
theorem Convex.inter {t : Set E} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) (ht : Convex 𝕜 t) : Convex 𝕜 (s ∩ t) :=
fun _ hx => (hs hx.1).inter (ht hx.2)
theorem convex_sInter {S : Set (Set E)} (h : ∀ s ∈ S, Convex 𝕜 s) : Convex 𝕜 (⋂₀ S) := fun _ hx =>
starConvex_sInter fun _ hs => h _ hs <| hx _ hs
theorem convex_iInter {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set E} (h : ∀ i, Convex 𝕜 (s i)) :
Convex 𝕜 (⋂ i, s i) :=
sInter_range s ▸ convex_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 h
theorem convex_iInter₂ {ι : Sort*} {κ : ι → Sort*} {s : (i : ι) → κ i → Set E}
(h : ∀ i j, Convex 𝕜 (s i j)) : Convex 𝕜 (⋂ (i) (j), s i j) :=
convex_iInter fun i => convex_iInter <| h i
theorem Convex.prod {s : Set E} {t : Set F} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) (ht : Convex 𝕜 t) :
Convex 𝕜 (s ×ˢ t) := fun _ hx => (hs hx.1).prod (ht hx.2)
theorem convex_pi {ι : Type*} {E : ι → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (E i)] [∀ i, SMul 𝕜 (E i)]
{s : Set ι} {t : ∀ i, Set (E i)} (ht : ∀ ⦃i⦄, i ∈ s → Convex 𝕜 (t i)) : Convex 𝕜 (s.pi t) :=
fun _ hx => starConvex_pi fun _ hi => ht hi <| hx _ hi
theorem Directed.convex_iUnion {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set E} (hdir : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s)
(hc : ∀ ⦃i : ι⦄, Convex 𝕜 (s i)) : Convex 𝕜 (⋃ i, s i) := by
rintro x hx y hy a b ha hb hab
rw [mem_iUnion] at hx hy ⊢
obtain ⟨i, hx⟩ := hx
obtain ⟨j, hy⟩ := hy
obtain ⟨k, hik, hjk⟩ := hdir i j
exact ⟨k, hc (hik hx) (hjk hy) ha hb hab⟩
theorem DirectedOn.convex_sUnion {c : Set (Set E)} (hdir : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) c)
(hc : ∀ ⦃A : Set E⦄, A ∈ c → Convex 𝕜 A) : Convex 𝕜 (⋃₀ c) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact (directedOn_iff_directed.1 hdir).convex_iUnion fun A => hc A.2
end SMul
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 F] {s : Set E} {x : E}
theorem convex_iff_openSegment_subset [ZeroLEOneClass 𝕜] :
Convex 𝕜 s ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → openSegment 𝕜 x y ⊆ s :=
forall₂_congr fun _ => starConvex_iff_openSegment_subset
theorem convex_iff_forall_pos :
Convex 𝕜 s ↔
∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 → a • x + b • y ∈ s :=
forall₂_congr fun _ => starConvex_iff_forall_pos
theorem convex_iff_pairwise_pos : Convex 𝕜 s ↔
s.Pairwise fun x y => ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 → a • x + b • y ∈ s := by
refine convex_iff_forall_pos.trans ⟨fun h x hx y hy _ => h hx hy, ?_⟩
intro h x hx y hy a b ha hb hab
obtain rfl | hxy := eq_or_ne x y
· rwa [Convex.combo_self hab]
· exact h hx hy hxy ha hb hab
theorem Convex.starConvex_iff [ZeroLEOneClass 𝕜] (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) (h : s.Nonempty) :
StarConvex 𝕜 x s ↔ x ∈ s :=
⟨fun hxs => hxs.mem h, hs.starConvex⟩
protected theorem Set.Subsingleton.convex {s : Set E} (h : s.Subsingleton) : Convex 𝕜 s :=
convex_iff_pairwise_pos.mpr (h.pairwise _)
@[simp] theorem convex_singleton (c : E) : Convex 𝕜 ({c} : Set E) :=
subsingleton_singleton.convex
theorem convex_zero : Convex 𝕜 (0 : Set E) :=
convex_singleton _
theorem convex_segment [IsOrderedRing 𝕜] (x y : E) : Convex 𝕜 [x -[𝕜] y] := by
rintro p ⟨ap, bp, hap, hbp, habp, rfl⟩ q ⟨aq, bq, haq, hbq, habq, rfl⟩ a b ha hb hab
refine
⟨a * ap + b * aq, a * bp + b * bq, add_nonneg (mul_nonneg ha hap) (mul_nonneg hb haq),
add_nonneg (mul_nonneg ha hbp) (mul_nonneg hb hbq), ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [add_add_add_comm, ← mul_add, ← mul_add, habp, habq, mul_one, mul_one, hab]
· match_scalars <;> noncomm_ring
theorem Convex.linear_image (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) : Convex 𝕜 (f '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ a b ha hb hab
exact ⟨a • x + b • y, hs hx hy ha hb hab, by rw [f.map_add, f.map_smul, f.map_smul]⟩
theorem Convex.is_linear_image (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) {f : E → F} (hf : IsLinearMap 𝕜 f) :
Convex 𝕜 (f '' s) :=
hs.linear_image <| hf.mk' f
theorem Convex.linear_preimage {𝕜₁ : Type*} [Semiring 𝕜₁] [Module 𝕜₁ E] [Module 𝕜₁ F] {s : Set F}
[SMul 𝕜 𝕜₁] [IsScalarTower 𝕜 𝕜₁ E] [IsScalarTower 𝕜 𝕜₁ F] (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) (f : E →ₗ[𝕜₁] F) :
Convex 𝕜 (f ⁻¹' s) := fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => by
rw [mem_preimage, f.map_add, LinearMap.map_smul_of_tower, LinearMap.map_smul_of_tower]
exact hs hx hy ha hb hab
theorem Convex.is_linear_preimage {𝕜₁ : Type*} [Semiring 𝕜₁] [Module 𝕜₁ E] [Module 𝕜₁ F] {s : Set F}
[SMul 𝕜 𝕜₁] [IsScalarTower 𝕜 𝕜₁ E] [IsScalarTower 𝕜 𝕜₁ F] (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) {f : E → F}
(hf : IsLinearMap 𝕜₁ f) :
Convex 𝕜 (f ⁻¹' s) :=
hs.linear_preimage <| hf.mk' f
theorem Convex.add {t : Set E} (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) (ht : Convex 𝕜 t) : Convex 𝕜 (s + t) := by
rw [← add_image_prod]
| exact (hs.prod ht).is_linear_image IsLinearMap.isLinearMap_add
variable (𝕜 E)
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Basic.lean | 189 | 191 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.NoZeroSMulDivisors.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.GroupWithZero.Action.Synonym
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity.Core
/-!
# Monotonicity of scalar multiplication by positive elements
This file defines typeclasses to reason about monotonicity of the operations
* `b ↦ a • b`, "left scalar multiplication"
* `a ↦ a • b`, "right scalar multiplication"
We use eight typeclasses to encode the various properties we care about for those two operations.
These typeclasses are meant to be mostly internal to this file, to set up each lemma in the
appropriate generality.
Less granular typeclasses like `OrderedAddCommMonoid`, `LinearOrderedField`, `OrderedSMul` should be
enough for most purposes, and the system is set up so that they imply the correct granular
typeclasses here. If those are enough for you, you may stop reading here! Else, beware that what
follows is a bit technical.
## Definitions
In all that follows, `α` and `β` are orders which have a `0` and such that `α` acts on `β` by scalar
multiplication. Note however that we do not use lawfulness of this action in most of the file. Hence
`•` should be considered here as a mostly arbitrary function `α → β → β`.
We use the following four typeclasses to reason about left scalar multiplication (`b ↦ a • b`):
* `PosSMulMono`: If `a ≥ 0`, then `b₁ ≤ b₂` implies `a • b₁ ≤ a • b₂`.
* `PosSMulStrictMono`: If `a > 0`, then `b₁ < b₂` implies `a • b₁ < a • b₂`.
* `PosSMulReflectLT`: If `a ≥ 0`, then `a • b₁ < a • b₂` implies `b₁ < b₂`.
* `PosSMulReflectLE`: If `a > 0`, then `a • b₁ ≤ a • b₂` implies `b₁ ≤ b₂`.
We use the following four typeclasses to reason about right scalar multiplication (`a ↦ a • b`):
* `SMulPosMono`: If `b ≥ 0`, then `a₁ ≤ a₂` implies `a₁ • b ≤ a₂ • b`.
* `SMulPosStrictMono`: If `b > 0`, then `a₁ < a₂` implies `a₁ • b < a₂ • b`.
* `SMulPosReflectLT`: If `b ≥ 0`, then `a₁ • b < a₂ • b` implies `a₁ < a₂`.
* `SMulPosReflectLE`: If `b > 0`, then `a₁ • b ≤ a₂ • b` implies `a₁ ≤ a₂`.
## Constructors
The four typeclasses about nonnegativity can usually be checked only on positive inputs due to their
condition becoming trivial when `a = 0` or `b = 0`. We therefore make the following constructors
available: `PosSMulMono.of_pos`, `PosSMulReflectLT.of_pos`, `SMulPosMono.of_pos`,
`SMulPosReflectLT.of_pos`
## Implications
As `α` and `β` get more and more structure, those typeclasses end up being equivalent. The commonly
used implications are:
* When `α`, `β` are partial orders:
* `PosSMulStrictMono → PosSMulMono`
* `SMulPosStrictMono → SMulPosMono`
* `PosSMulReflectLE → PosSMulReflectLT`
* `SMulPosReflectLE → SMulPosReflectLT`
* When `β` is a linear order:
* `PosSMulStrictMono → PosSMulReflectLE`
* `PosSMulReflectLT → PosSMulMono` (not registered as instance)
* `SMulPosReflectLT → SMulPosMono` (not registered as instance)
* `PosSMulReflectLE → PosSMulStrictMono` (not registered as instance)
* `SMulPosReflectLE → SMulPosStrictMono` (not registered as instance)
* When `α` is a linear order:
* `SMulPosStrictMono → SMulPosReflectLE`
* When `α` is an ordered ring, `β` an ordered group and also an `α`-module:
* `PosSMulMono → SMulPosMono`
* `PosSMulStrictMono → SMulPosStrictMono`
* When `α` is an linear ordered semifield, `β` is an `α`-module:
* `PosSMulStrictMono → PosSMulReflectLT`
* `PosSMulMono → PosSMulReflectLE`
* When `α` is a semiring, `β` is an `α`-module with `NoZeroSMulDivisors`:
* `PosSMulMono → PosSMulStrictMono` (not registered as instance)
* When `α` is a ring, `β` is an `α`-module with `NoZeroSMulDivisors`:
* `SMulPosMono → SMulPosStrictMono` (not registered as instance)
Further, the bundled non-granular typeclasses imply the granular ones like so:
* `OrderedSMul → PosSMulStrictMono`
* `OrderedSMul → PosSMulReflectLT`
Unless otherwise stated, all these implications are registered as instances,
which means that in practice you should not worry about these implications.
However, if you encounter a case where you think a statement is true but
not covered by the current implications, please bring it up on Zulip!
## Implementation notes
This file uses custom typeclasses instead of abbreviations of `CovariantClass`/`ContravariantClass`
because:
* They get displayed as classes in the docs. In particular, one can see their list of instances,
instead of their instances being invariably dumped to the `CovariantClass`/`ContravariantClass`
list.
* They don't pollute other typeclass searches. Having many abbreviations of the same typeclass for
different purposes always felt like a performance issue (more instances with the same key, for no
added benefit), and indeed making the classes here abbreviation previous creates timeouts due to
the higher number of `CovariantClass`/`ContravariantClass` instances.
* `SMulPosReflectLT`/`SMulPosReflectLE` do not fit in the framework since they relate `≤` on two
different types. So we would have to generalise `CovariantClass`/`ContravariantClass` to three
types and two relations.
* Very minor, but the constructors let you work with `a : α`, `h : 0 ≤ a` instead of
`a : {a : α // 0 ≤ a}`. This actually makes some instances surprisingly cleaner to prove.
* The `CovariantClass`/`ContravariantClass` framework is only useful to automate very simple logic
anyway. It is easily copied over.
In the future, it would be good to make the corresponding typeclasses in
`Mathlib.Algebra.Order.GroupWithZero.Unbundled` custom typeclasses too.
## TODO
This file acts as a substitute for `Mathlib.Algebra.Order.SMul`. We now need to
* finish the transition by deleting the duplicate lemmas
* rearrange the non-duplicate lemmas into new files
* generalise (most of) the lemmas from `Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module` to here
* rethink `OrderedSMul`
-/
open OrderDual
variable (α β : Type*)
section Defs
variable [SMul α β] [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
section Left
variable [Zero α]
/-- Typeclass for monotonicity of scalar multiplication by nonnegative elements on the left,
namely `b₁ ≤ b₂ → a • b₁ ≤ a • b₂` if `0 ≤ a`.
You should usually not use this very granular typeclass directly, but rather a typeclass like
`OrderedSMul`. -/
class PosSMulMono : Prop where
/-- Do not use this. Use `smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left` instead. -/
protected elim ⦃a : α⦄ (ha : 0 ≤ a) ⦃b₁ b₂ : β⦄ (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : a • b₁ ≤ a • b₂
/-- Typeclass for strict monotonicity of scalar multiplication by positive elements on the left,
namely `b₁ < b₂ → a • b₁ < a • b₂` if `0 < a`.
You should usually not use this very granular typeclass directly, but rather a typeclass like
`OrderedSMul`. -/
class PosSMulStrictMono : Prop where
/-- Do not use this. Use `smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left` instead. -/
protected elim ⦃a : α⦄ (ha : 0 < a) ⦃b₁ b₂ : β⦄ (hb : b₁ < b₂) : a • b₁ < a • b₂
/-- Typeclass for strict reverse monotonicity of scalar multiplication by nonnegative elements on
the left, namely `a • b₁ < a • b₂ → b₁ < b₂` if `0 ≤ a`.
You should usually not use this very granular typeclass directly, but rather a typeclass like
`OrderedSMul`. -/
class PosSMulReflectLT : Prop where
/-- Do not use this. Use `lt_of_smul_lt_smul_left` instead. -/
protected elim ⦃a : α⦄ (ha : 0 ≤ a) ⦃b₁ b₂ : β⦄ (hb : a • b₁ < a • b₂) : b₁ < b₂
/-- Typeclass for reverse monotonicity of scalar multiplication by positive elements on the left,
namely `a • b₁ ≤ a • b₂ → b₁ ≤ b₂` if `0 < a`.
You should usually not use this very granular typeclass directly, but rather a typeclass like
`OrderedSMul`. -/
class PosSMulReflectLE : Prop where
/-- Do not use this. Use `le_of_smul_lt_smul_left` instead. -/
protected elim ⦃a : α⦄ (ha : 0 < a) ⦃b₁ b₂ : β⦄ (hb : a • b₁ ≤ a • b₂) : b₁ ≤ b₂
end Left
section Right
variable [Zero β]
/-- Typeclass for monotonicity of scalar multiplication by nonnegative elements on the left,
namely `a₁ ≤ a₂ → a₁ • b ≤ a₂ • b` if `0 ≤ b`.
You should usually not use this very granular typeclass directly, but rather a typeclass like
`OrderedSMul`. -/
class SMulPosMono : Prop where
/-- Do not use this. Use `smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right` instead. -/
protected elim ⦃b : β⦄ (hb : 0 ≤ b) ⦃a₁ a₂ : α⦄ (ha : a₁ ≤ a₂) : a₁ • b ≤ a₂ • b
/-- Typeclass for strict monotonicity of scalar multiplication by positive elements on the left,
namely `a₁ < a₂ → a₁ • b < a₂ • b` if `0 < b`.
You should usually not use this very granular typeclass directly, but rather a typeclass like
`OrderedSMul`. -/
class SMulPosStrictMono : Prop where
/-- Do not use this. Use `smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right` instead. -/
protected elim ⦃b : β⦄ (hb : 0 < b) ⦃a₁ a₂ : α⦄ (ha : a₁ < a₂) : a₁ • b < a₂ • b
/-- Typeclass for strict reverse monotonicity of scalar multiplication by nonnegative elements on
the left, namely `a₁ • b < a₂ • b → a₁ < a₂` if `0 ≤ b`.
You should usually not use this very granular typeclass directly, but rather a typeclass like
`OrderedSMul`. -/
class SMulPosReflectLT : Prop where
/-- Do not use this. Use `lt_of_smul_lt_smul_right` instead. -/
protected elim ⦃b : β⦄ (hb : 0 ≤ b) ⦃a₁ a₂ : α⦄ (hb : a₁ • b < a₂ • b) : a₁ < a₂
/-- Typeclass for reverse monotonicity of scalar multiplication by positive elements on the left,
namely `a₁ • b ≤ a₂ • b → a₁ ≤ a₂` if `0 < b`.
You should usually not use this very granular typeclass directly, but rather a typeclass like
`OrderedSMul`. -/
class SMulPosReflectLE : Prop where
/-- Do not use this. Use `le_of_smul_lt_smul_right` instead. -/
protected elim ⦃b : β⦄ (hb : 0 < b) ⦃a₁ a₂ : α⦄ (hb : a₁ • b ≤ a₂ • b) : a₁ ≤ a₂
end Right
end Defs
variable {α β} {a a₁ a₂ : α} {b b₁ b₂ : β}
section Mul
variable [Zero α] [Mul α] [Preorder α]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) PosMulMono.toPosSMulMono [PosMulMono α] : PosSMulMono α α where
elim _a ha _b₁ _b₂ hb := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hb ha
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) PosMulStrictMono.toPosSMulStrictMono [PosMulStrictMono α] :
PosSMulStrictMono α α where
elim _a ha _b₁ _b₂ hb := mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left hb ha
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) PosMulReflectLT.toPosSMulReflectLT [PosMulReflectLT α] :
PosSMulReflectLT α α where
elim _a ha _b₁ _b₂ h := lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left h ha
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) PosMulReflectLE.toPosSMulReflectLE [PosMulReflectLE α] :
PosSMulReflectLE α α where
elim _a ha _b₁ _b₂ h := le_of_mul_le_mul_left h ha
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) MulPosMono.toSMulPosMono [MulPosMono α] : SMulPosMono α α where
elim _b hb _a₁ _a₂ ha := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ha hb
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) MulPosStrictMono.toSMulPosStrictMono [MulPosStrictMono α] :
SMulPosStrictMono α α where
elim _b hb _a₁ _a₂ ha := mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right ha hb
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) MulPosReflectLT.toSMulPosReflectLT [MulPosReflectLT α] :
SMulPosReflectLT α α where
elim _b hb _a₁ _a₂ h := lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right h hb
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) MulPosReflectLE.toSMulPosReflectLE [MulPosReflectLE α] :
SMulPosReflectLE α α where
elim _b hb _a₁ _a₂ h := le_of_mul_le_mul_right h hb
end Mul
section SMul
variable [SMul α β]
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
section Left
variable [Zero α]
lemma monotone_smul_left_of_nonneg [PosSMulMono α β] (ha : 0 ≤ a) : Monotone ((a • ·) : β → β) :=
PosSMulMono.elim ha
lemma strictMono_smul_left_of_pos [PosSMulStrictMono α β] (ha : 0 < a) :
StrictMono ((a • ·) : β → β) := PosSMulStrictMono.elim ha
@[gcongr] lemma smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left [PosSMulMono α β] (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) (ha : 0 ≤ a) :
a • b₁ ≤ a • b₂ := monotone_smul_left_of_nonneg ha hb
@[gcongr] lemma smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left [PosSMulStrictMono α β] (hb : b₁ < b₂) (ha : 0 < a) :
a • b₁ < a • b₂ := strictMono_smul_left_of_pos ha hb
lemma lt_of_smul_lt_smul_left [PosSMulReflectLT α β] (h : a • b₁ < a • b₂) (ha : 0 ≤ a) : b₁ < b₂ :=
PosSMulReflectLT.elim ha h
lemma le_of_smul_le_smul_left [PosSMulReflectLE α β] (h : a • b₁ ≤ a • b₂) (ha : 0 < a) : b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
PosSMulReflectLE.elim ha h
alias lt_of_smul_lt_smul_of_nonneg_left := lt_of_smul_lt_smul_left
alias le_of_smul_le_smul_of_pos_left := le_of_smul_le_smul_left
@[simp]
lemma smul_le_smul_iff_of_pos_left [PosSMulMono α β] [PosSMulReflectLE α β] (ha : 0 < a) :
a • b₁ ≤ a • b₂ ↔ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h ↦ le_of_smul_le_smul_left h ha, fun h ↦ smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left h ha.le⟩
@[simp]
lemma smul_lt_smul_iff_of_pos_left [PosSMulStrictMono α β] [PosSMulReflectLT α β] (ha : 0 < a) :
a • b₁ < a • b₂ ↔ b₁ < b₂ :=
⟨fun h ↦ lt_of_smul_lt_smul_left h ha.le, fun hb ↦ smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hb ha⟩
end Left
section Right
variable [Zero β]
lemma monotone_smul_right_of_nonneg [SMulPosMono α β] (hb : 0 ≤ b) : Monotone ((· • b) : α → β) :=
SMulPosMono.elim hb
lemma strictMono_smul_right_of_pos [SMulPosStrictMono α β] (hb : 0 < b) :
StrictMono ((· • b) : α → β) := SMulPosStrictMono.elim hb
@[gcongr] lemma smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right [SMulPosMono α β] (ha : a₁ ≤ a₂) (hb : 0 ≤ b) :
a₁ • b ≤ a₂ • b := monotone_smul_right_of_nonneg hb ha
@[gcongr] lemma smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right [SMulPosStrictMono α β] (ha : a₁ < a₂) (hb : 0 < b) :
a₁ • b < a₂ • b := strictMono_smul_right_of_pos hb ha
lemma lt_of_smul_lt_smul_right [SMulPosReflectLT α β] (h : a₁ • b < a₂ • b) (hb : 0 ≤ b) :
a₁ < a₂ := SMulPosReflectLT.elim hb h
lemma le_of_smul_le_smul_right [SMulPosReflectLE α β] (h : a₁ • b ≤ a₂ • b) (hb : 0 < b) :
a₁ ≤ a₂ := SMulPosReflectLE.elim hb h
alias lt_of_smul_lt_smul_of_nonneg_right := lt_of_smul_lt_smul_right
alias le_of_smul_le_smul_of_pos_right := le_of_smul_le_smul_right
@[simp]
lemma smul_le_smul_iff_of_pos_right [SMulPosMono α β] [SMulPosReflectLE α β] (hb : 0 < b) :
a₁ • b ≤ a₂ • b ↔ a₁ ≤ a₂ :=
⟨fun h ↦ le_of_smul_le_smul_right h hb, fun ha ↦ smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right ha hb.le⟩
@[simp]
lemma smul_lt_smul_iff_of_pos_right [SMulPosStrictMono α β] [SMulPosReflectLT α β] (hb : 0 < b) :
a₁ • b < a₂ • b ↔ a₁ < a₂ :=
⟨fun h ↦ lt_of_smul_lt_smul_right h hb.le, fun ha ↦ smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right ha hb⟩
end Right
section LeftRight
variable [Zero α] [Zero β]
lemma smul_lt_smul_of_le_of_lt [PosSMulStrictMono α β] [SMulPosMono α β] (ha : a₁ ≤ a₂)
(hb : b₁ < b₂) (h₁ : 0 < a₁) (h₂ : 0 ≤ b₂) : a₁ • b₁ < a₂ • b₂ :=
(smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hb h₁).trans_le (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right ha h₂)
lemma smul_lt_smul_of_le_of_lt' [PosSMulStrictMono α β] [SMulPosMono α β] (ha : a₁ ≤ a₂)
(hb : b₁ < b₂) (h₂ : 0 < a₂) (h₁ : 0 ≤ b₁) : a₁ • b₁ < a₂ • b₂ :=
(smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right ha h₁).trans_lt (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hb h₂)
lemma smul_lt_smul_of_lt_of_le [PosSMulMono α β] [SMulPosStrictMono α β] (ha : a₁ < a₂)
(hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) (h₁ : 0 ≤ a₁) (h₂ : 0 < b₂) : a₁ • b₁ < a₂ • b₂ :=
(smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hb h₁).trans_lt (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right ha h₂)
lemma smul_lt_smul_of_lt_of_le' [PosSMulMono α β] [SMulPosStrictMono α β] (ha : a₁ < a₂)
(hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) (h₂ : 0 ≤ a₂) (h₁ : 0 < b₁) : a₁ • b₁ < a₂ • b₂ :=
(smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right ha h₁).trans_le (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hb h₂)
lemma smul_lt_smul [PosSMulStrictMono α β] [SMulPosStrictMono α β] (ha : a₁ < a₂) (hb : b₁ < b₂)
(h₁ : 0 < a₁) (h₂ : 0 < b₂) : a₁ • b₁ < a₂ • b₂ :=
(smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hb h₁).trans (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right ha h₂)
lemma smul_lt_smul' [PosSMulStrictMono α β] [SMulPosStrictMono α β] (ha : a₁ < a₂) (hb : b₁ < b₂)
(h₂ : 0 < a₂) (h₁ : 0 < b₁) : a₁ • b₁ < a₂ • b₂ :=
(smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right ha h₁).trans (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hb h₂)
lemma smul_le_smul [PosSMulMono α β] [SMulPosMono α β] (ha : a₁ ≤ a₂) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂)
(h₁ : 0 ≤ a₁) (h₂ : 0 ≤ b₂) : a₁ • b₁ ≤ a₂ • b₂ :=
(smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hb h₁).trans (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right ha h₂)
lemma smul_le_smul' [PosSMulMono α β] [SMulPosMono α β] (ha : a₁ ≤ a₂) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) (h₂ : 0 ≤ a₂)
(h₁ : 0 ≤ b₁) : a₁ • b₁ ≤ a₂ • b₂ :=
(smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right ha h₁).trans (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hb h₂)
end LeftRight
end Preorder
section LinearOrder
variable [Preorder α] [LinearOrder β]
section Left
variable [Zero α]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) PosSMulStrictMono.toPosSMulReflectLE [PosSMulStrictMono α β] :
PosSMulReflectLE α β where
elim _a ha _b₁ _b₂ := (strictMono_smul_left_of_pos ha).le_iff_le.1
lemma PosSMulReflectLE.toPosSMulStrictMono [PosSMulReflectLE α β] : PosSMulStrictMono α β where
elim _a ha _b₁ _b₂ hb := not_le.1 fun h ↦ hb.not_le <| le_of_smul_le_smul_left h ha
lemma posSMulStrictMono_iff_PosSMulReflectLE : PosSMulStrictMono α β ↔ PosSMulReflectLE α β :=
⟨fun _ ↦ inferInstance, fun _ ↦ PosSMulReflectLE.toPosSMulStrictMono⟩
instance PosSMulMono.toPosSMulReflectLT [PosSMulMono α β] : PosSMulReflectLT α β where
elim _a ha _b₁ _b₂ := (monotone_smul_left_of_nonneg ha).reflect_lt
lemma PosSMulReflectLT.toPosSMulMono [PosSMulReflectLT α β] : PosSMulMono α β where
elim _a ha _b₁ _b₂ hb := not_lt.1 fun h ↦ hb.not_lt <| lt_of_smul_lt_smul_left h ha
lemma posSMulMono_iff_posSMulReflectLT : PosSMulMono α β ↔ PosSMulReflectLT α β :=
⟨fun _ ↦ PosSMulMono.toPosSMulReflectLT, fun _ ↦ PosSMulReflectLT.toPosSMulMono⟩
lemma smul_max_of_nonneg [PosSMulMono α β] (ha : 0 ≤ a) (b₁ b₂ : β) :
a • max b₁ b₂ = max (a • b₁) (a • b₂) := (monotone_smul_left_of_nonneg ha).map_max
lemma smul_min_of_nonneg [PosSMulMono α β] (ha : 0 ≤ a) (b₁ b₂ : β) :
a • min b₁ b₂ = min (a • b₁) (a • b₂) := (monotone_smul_left_of_nonneg ha).map_min
end Left
section Right
variable [Zero β]
lemma SMulPosReflectLE.toSMulPosStrictMono [SMulPosReflectLE α β] : SMulPosStrictMono α β where
elim _b hb _a₁ _a₂ ha := not_le.1 fun h ↦ ha.not_le <| le_of_smul_le_smul_of_pos_right h hb
lemma SMulPosReflectLT.toSMulPosMono [SMulPosReflectLT α β] : SMulPosMono α β where
elim _b hb _a₁ _a₂ ha := not_lt.1 fun h ↦ ha.not_lt <| lt_of_smul_lt_smul_right h hb
end Right
end LinearOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] [Preorder β]
section Right
variable [Zero β]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) SMulPosStrictMono.toSMulPosReflectLE [SMulPosStrictMono α β] :
SMulPosReflectLE α β where
elim _b hb _a₁ _a₂ h := not_lt.1 fun ha ↦ h.not_lt <| smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right ha hb
lemma SMulPosMono.toSMulPosReflectLT [SMulPosMono α β] : SMulPosReflectLT α β where
elim _b hb _a₁ _a₂ h := not_le.1 fun ha ↦ h.not_le <| smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right ha hb
end Right
end LinearOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] [LinearOrder β]
section Right
variable [Zero β]
lemma smulPosStrictMono_iff_SMulPosReflectLE : SMulPosStrictMono α β ↔ SMulPosReflectLE α β :=
⟨fun _ ↦ SMulPosStrictMono.toSMulPosReflectLE, fun _ ↦ SMulPosReflectLE.toSMulPosStrictMono⟩
lemma smulPosMono_iff_smulPosReflectLT : SMulPosMono α β ↔ SMulPosReflectLT α β :=
⟨fun _ ↦ SMulPosMono.toSMulPosReflectLT, fun _ ↦ SMulPosReflectLT.toSMulPosMono⟩
end Right
end LinearOrder
end SMul
section SMulZeroClass
variable [Zero α] [Zero β] [SMulZeroClass α β]
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
lemma smul_pos [PosSMulStrictMono α β] (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 0 < a • b := by
simpa only [smul_zero] using smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hb ha
lemma smul_neg_of_pos_of_neg [PosSMulStrictMono α β] (ha : 0 < a) (hb : b < 0) : a • b < 0 := by
simpa only [smul_zero] using smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hb ha
@[simp]
lemma smul_pos_iff_of_pos_left [PosSMulStrictMono α β] [PosSMulReflectLT α β] (ha : 0 < a) :
0 < a • b ↔ 0 < b := by
simpa only [smul_zero] using smul_lt_smul_iff_of_pos_left ha (b₁ := 0) (b₂ := b)
lemma smul_neg_iff_of_pos_left [PosSMulStrictMono α β] [PosSMulReflectLT α β] (ha : 0 < a) :
a • b < 0 ↔ b < 0 := by
simpa only [smul_zero] using smul_lt_smul_iff_of_pos_left ha (b₂ := (0 : β))
lemma smul_nonneg [PosSMulMono α β] (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b₁) : 0 ≤ a • b₁ := by
simpa only [smul_zero] using smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hb ha
lemma smul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos [PosSMulMono α β] (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : b ≤ 0) : a • b ≤ 0 := by
simpa only [smul_zero] using smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hb ha
lemma pos_of_smul_pos_left [PosSMulReflectLT α β] (h : 0 < a • b) (ha : 0 ≤ a) : 0 < b :=
lt_of_smul_lt_smul_left (by rwa [smul_zero]) ha
lemma neg_of_smul_neg_left [PosSMulReflectLT α β] (h : a • b < 0) (ha : 0 ≤ a) : b < 0 :=
lt_of_smul_lt_smul_left (by rwa [smul_zero]) ha
end Preorder
end SMulZeroClass
section SMulWithZero
variable [Zero α] [Zero β] [SMulWithZero α β]
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
lemma smul_pos' [SMulPosStrictMono α β] (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 0 < a • b := by
simpa only [zero_smul] using smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right ha hb
lemma smul_neg_of_neg_of_pos [SMulPosStrictMono α β] (ha : a < 0) (hb : 0 < b) : a • b < 0 := by
simpa only [zero_smul] using smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right ha hb
@[simp]
lemma smul_pos_iff_of_pos_right [SMulPosStrictMono α β] [SMulPosReflectLT α β] (hb : 0 < b) :
0 < a • b ↔ 0 < a := by
simpa only [zero_smul] using smul_lt_smul_iff_of_pos_right hb (a₁ := 0) (a₂ := a)
lemma smul_nonneg' [SMulPosMono α β] (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b₁) : 0 ≤ a • b₁ := by
simpa only [zero_smul] using smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right ha hb
lemma smul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg [SMulPosMono α β] (ha : a ≤ 0) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : a • b ≤ 0 := by
simpa only [zero_smul] using smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right ha hb
lemma pos_of_smul_pos_right [SMulPosReflectLT α β] (h : 0 < a • b) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : 0 < a :=
lt_of_smul_lt_smul_right (by rwa [zero_smul]) hb
lemma neg_of_smul_neg_right [SMulPosReflectLT α β] (h : a • b < 0) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : a < 0 :=
lt_of_smul_lt_smul_right (by rwa [zero_smul]) hb
lemma pos_iff_pos_of_smul_pos [PosSMulReflectLT α β] [SMulPosReflectLT α β] (hab : 0 < a • b) :
0 < a ↔ 0 < b :=
⟨pos_of_smul_pos_left hab ∘ le_of_lt, pos_of_smul_pos_right hab ∘ le_of_lt⟩
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [Preorder β]
/-- A constructor for `PosSMulMono` requiring you to prove `b₁ ≤ b₂ → a • b₁ ≤ a • b₂` only when
`0 < a` -/
lemma PosSMulMono.of_pos (h₀ : ∀ a : α, 0 < a → ∀ b₁ b₂ : β, b₁ ≤ b₂ → a • b₁ ≤ a • b₂) :
PosSMulMono α β where
elim a ha b₁ b₂ h := by
obtain ha | ha := ha.eq_or_lt
· simp [← ha]
· exact h₀ _ ha _ _ h
/-- A constructor for `PosSMulReflectLT` requiring you to prove `a • b₁ < a • b₂ → b₁ < b₂` only
when `0 < a` -/
lemma PosSMulReflectLT.of_pos (h₀ : ∀ a : α, 0 < a → ∀ b₁ b₂ : β, a • b₁ < a • b₂ → b₁ < b₂) :
PosSMulReflectLT α β where
elim a ha b₁ b₂ h := by
obtain ha | ha := ha.eq_or_lt
· simp [← ha] at h
· exact h₀ _ ha _ _ h
end PartialOrder
section PartialOrder
variable [Preorder α] [PartialOrder β]
/-- A constructor for `SMulPosMono` requiring you to prove `a₁ ≤ a₂ → a₁ • b ≤ a₂ • b` only when
`0 < b` -/
lemma SMulPosMono.of_pos (h₀ : ∀ b : β, 0 < b → ∀ a₁ a₂ : α, a₁ ≤ a₂ → a₁ • b ≤ a₂ • b) :
SMulPosMono α β where
elim b hb a₁ a₂ h := by
obtain hb | hb := hb.eq_or_lt
· simp [← hb]
· exact h₀ _ hb _ _ h
/-- A constructor for `SMulPosReflectLT` requiring you to prove `a₁ • b < a₂ • b → a₁ < a₂` only
when `0 < b` -/
lemma SMulPosReflectLT.of_pos (h₀ : ∀ b : β, 0 < b → ∀ a₁ a₂ : α, a₁ • b < a₂ • b → a₁ < a₂) :
SMulPosReflectLT α β where
elim b hb a₁ a₂ h := by
obtain hb | hb := hb.eq_or_lt
· simp [← hb] at h
· exact h₀ _ hb _ _ h
end PartialOrder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [PartialOrder β]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) PosSMulStrictMono.toPosSMulMono [PosSMulStrictMono α β] :
PosSMulMono α β :=
PosSMulMono.of_pos fun _a ha ↦ (strictMono_smul_left_of_pos ha).monotone
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) SMulPosStrictMono.toSMulPosMono [SMulPosStrictMono α β] :
SMulPosMono α β :=
SMulPosMono.of_pos fun _b hb ↦ (strictMono_smul_right_of_pos hb).monotone
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) PosSMulReflectLE.toPosSMulReflectLT [PosSMulReflectLE α β] :
PosSMulReflectLT α β :=
PosSMulReflectLT.of_pos fun a ha b₁ b₂ h ↦
(le_of_smul_le_smul_of_pos_left h.le ha).lt_of_ne <| by rintro rfl; simp at h
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) SMulPosReflectLE.toSMulPosReflectLT [SMulPosReflectLE α β] :
SMulPosReflectLT α β :=
SMulPosReflectLT.of_pos fun b hb a₁ a₂ h ↦
(le_of_smul_le_smul_of_pos_right h.le hb).lt_of_ne <| by rintro rfl; simp at h
lemma smul_eq_smul_iff_eq_and_eq_of_pos [PosSMulStrictMono α β] [SMulPosStrictMono α β]
(ha : a₁ ≤ a₂) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) (h₁ : 0 < a₁) (h₂ : 0 < b₂) :
a₁ • b₁ = a₂ • b₂ ↔ a₁ = a₂ ∧ b₁ = b₂ := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, by rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩; rfl⟩
simp only [eq_iff_le_not_lt, ha, hb, true_and]
refine ⟨fun ha ↦ h.not_lt ?_, fun hb ↦ h.not_lt ?_⟩
· exact (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hb h₁.le).trans_lt (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right ha h₂)
· exact (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hb h₁).trans_le (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right ha h₂.le)
lemma smul_eq_smul_iff_eq_and_eq_of_pos' [PosSMulStrictMono α β] [SMulPosStrictMono α β]
(ha : a₁ ≤ a₂) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) (h₂ : 0 < a₂) (h₁ : 0 < b₁) :
a₁ • b₁ = a₂ • b₂ ↔ a₁ = a₂ ∧ b₁ = b₂ := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, by rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩; rfl⟩
simp only [eq_iff_le_not_lt, ha, hb, true_and]
refine ⟨fun ha ↦ h.not_lt ?_, fun hb ↦ h.not_lt ?_⟩
· exact (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right ha h₁).trans_le (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_left hb h₂.le)
· exact (smul_le_smul_of_nonneg_right ha h₁.le).trans_lt (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hb h₂)
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] [LinearOrder β]
lemma pos_and_pos_or_neg_and_neg_of_smul_pos [PosSMulMono α β] [SMulPosMono α β] (hab : 0 < a • b) :
0 < a ∧ 0 < b ∨ a < 0 ∧ b < 0 := by
obtain ha | rfl | ha := lt_trichotomy a 0
· refine Or.inr ⟨ha, lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (fun hb ↦ ?_) hab⟩
| exact smul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg ha.le hb
· rw [zero_smul] at hab
exact hab.false.elim
· refine Or.inl ⟨ha, lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (fun hb ↦ ?_) hab⟩
exact smul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos ha.le hb
lemma neg_of_smul_pos_right [PosSMulMono α β] [SMulPosMono α β] (h : 0 < a • b) (ha : a ≤ 0) :
b < 0 := ((pos_and_pos_or_neg_and_neg_of_smul_pos h).resolve_left fun h ↦ h.1.not_le ha).2
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Module/Defs.lean | 619 | 626 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Gabriel Ebner
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.SplitIfs
import Mathlib.Tactic.OfNat
/-!
# Cast of natural numbers
This file defines the *canonical* homomorphism from the natural numbers into an
`AddMonoid` with a one. In additive monoids with one, there exists a unique
such homomorphism and we store it in the `natCast : ℕ → R` field.
Preferentially, the homomorphism is written as the coercion `Nat.cast`.
## Main declarations
* `NatCast`: Type class for `Nat.cast`.
* `AddMonoidWithOne`: Type class for which `Nat.cast` is a canonical monoid homomorphism from `ℕ`.
* `Nat.cast`: Canonical homomorphism `ℕ → R`.
-/
variable {R : Type*}
/-- The numeral `((0+1)+⋯)+1`. -/
protected def Nat.unaryCast [One R] [Zero R] [Add R] : ℕ → R
| 0 => 0
| n + 1 => Nat.unaryCast n + 1
-- the following four declarations are not in mathlib3 and are relevant to the way numeric
-- literals are handled in Lean 4.
/-- A type class for natural numbers which are greater than or equal to `2`. -/
class Nat.AtLeastTwo (n : ℕ) : Prop where
prop : n ≥ 2
instance instNatAtLeastTwo {n : ℕ} : Nat.AtLeastTwo (n + 2) where
prop := Nat.succ_le_succ <| Nat.succ_le_succ <| Nat.zero_le _
namespace Nat.AtLeastTwo
variable {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo]
lemma one_lt : 1 < n := prop
lemma ne_one : n ≠ 1 := Nat.ne_of_gt one_lt
end Nat.AtLeastTwo
/-- Recognize numeric literals which are at least `2` as terms of `R` via `Nat.cast`. This
instance is what makes things like `37 : R` type check. Note that `0` and `1` are not needed
because they are recognized as terms of `R` (at least when `R` is an `AddMonoidWithOne`) through
`Zero` and `One`, respectively. -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
instance (priority := 100) instOfNatAtLeastTwo {n : ℕ} [NatCast R] [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] :
OfNat R n where
ofNat := n.cast
library_note "no_index around OfNat.ofNat"
/--
When writing lemmas about `OfNat.ofNat` that assume `Nat.AtLeastTwo`, the term needs to be wrapped
in `no_index` so as not to confuse `simp`, as `no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)`.
Rather than referencing this library note, use `ofNat(n)` as a shorthand for
`no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)`.
Some discussion is [on Zulip here](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/.E2.9C.94.20Polynomial.2Ecoeff.20example/near/395438147).
-/
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem Nat.cast_ofNat {n : ℕ} [NatCast R] [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] :
(Nat.cast ofNat(n) : R) = ofNat(n) := rfl
@[deprecated Nat.cast_ofNat (since := "2024-12-22")]
theorem Nat.cast_eq_ofNat {n : ℕ} [NatCast R] [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] :
(Nat.cast n : R) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
rfl
/-! ### Additive monoids with one -/
/-- An `AddMonoidWithOne` is an `AddMonoid` with a `1`.
It also contains data for the unique homomorphism `ℕ → R`. -/
class AddMonoidWithOne (R : Type*) extends NatCast R, AddMonoid R, One R where
natCast := Nat.unaryCast
/-- The canonical map `ℕ → R` sends `0 : ℕ` to `0 : R`. -/
natCast_zero : natCast 0 = 0 := by intros; rfl
/-- The canonical map `ℕ → R` is a homomorphism. -/
natCast_succ : ∀ n, natCast (n + 1) = natCast n + 1 := by intros; rfl
/-- An `AddCommMonoidWithOne` is an `AddMonoidWithOne` satisfying `a + b = b + a`. -/
class AddCommMonoidWithOne (R : Type*) extends AddMonoidWithOne R, AddCommMonoid R
library_note "coercion into rings"
/--
Coercions such as `Nat.castCoe` that go from a concrete structure such as
`ℕ` to an arbitrary ring `R` should be set up as follows:
```lean
instance : CoeTail ℕ R where coe := ...
instance : CoeHTCT ℕ R where coe := ...
```
It needs to be `CoeTail` instead of `Coe` because otherwise type-class
inference would loop when constructing the transitive coercion `ℕ → ℕ → ℕ → ...`.
Sometimes we also need to declare the `CoeHTCT` instance
if we need to shadow another coercion
(e.g. `Nat.cast` should be used over `Int.ofNat`).
-/
namespace Nat
variable [AddMonoidWithOne R]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_zero : ((0 : ℕ) : R) = 0 :=
AddMonoidWithOne.natCast_zero
-- Lemmas about `Nat.succ` need to get a low priority, so that they are tried last.
-- This is because `Nat.succ _` matches `1`, `3`, `x+1`, etc.
-- Rewriting would then produce really wrong terms.
@[norm_cast 500]
theorem cast_succ (n : ℕ) : ((succ n : ℕ) : R) = n + 1 :=
AddMonoidWithOne.natCast_succ _
theorem cast_add_one (n : ℕ) : ((n + 1 : ℕ) : R) = n + 1 :=
cast_succ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_ite (P : Prop) [Decidable P] (m n : ℕ) :
((ite P m n : ℕ) : R) = ite P (m : R) (n : R) := by
split_ifs <;> rfl
end Nat
namespace Nat
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one [AddMonoidWithOne R] : ((1 : ℕ) : R) = 1 := by
rw [cast_succ, Nat.cast_zero, zero_add]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_add [AddMonoidWithOne R] (m n : ℕ) : ((m + n : ℕ) : R) = m + n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [add_succ, cast_succ, ih, cast_succ, add_assoc]
/-- Computationally friendlier cast than `Nat.unaryCast`, using binary representation. -/
protected def binCast [Zero R] [One R] [Add R] : ℕ → R
| 0 => 0
| n + 1 => if (n + 1) % 2 = 0
then (Nat.binCast ((n + 1) / 2)) + (Nat.binCast ((n + 1) / 2))
else (Nat.binCast ((n + 1) / 2)) + (Nat.binCast ((n + 1) / 2)) + 1
| @[simp]
theorem binCast_eq [AddMonoidWithOne R] (n : ℕ) :
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Cast/Defs.lean | 154 | 155 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Path
/-!
# Path connectedness
Continuing from `Mathlib.Topology.Path`, this file defines path components and path-connected
spaces.
## Main definitions
In the file the unit interval `[0, 1]` in `ℝ` is denoted by `I`, and `X` is a topological space.
* `Joined (x y : X)` means there is a path between `x` and `y`.
* `Joined.somePath (h : Joined x y)` selects some path between two points `x` and `y`.
* `pathComponent (x : X)` is the set of points joined to `x`.
* `PathConnectedSpace X` is a predicate class asserting that `X` is non-empty and every two
points of `X` are joined.
Then there are corresponding relative notions for `F : Set X`.
* `JoinedIn F (x y : X)` means there is a path `γ` joining `x` to `y` with values in `F`.
* `JoinedIn.somePath (h : JoinedIn F x y)` selects a path from `x` to `y` inside `F`.
* `pathComponentIn F (x : X)` is the set of points joined to `x` in `F`.
* `IsPathConnected F` asserts that `F` is non-empty and every two
points of `F` are joined in `F`.
## Main theorems
* `Joined` is an equivalence relation, while `JoinedIn F` is at least symmetric and transitive.
One can link the absolute and relative version in two directions, using `(univ : Set X)` or the
subtype `↥F`.
* `pathConnectedSpace_iff_univ : PathConnectedSpace X ↔ IsPathConnected (univ : Set X)`
* `isPathConnected_iff_pathConnectedSpace : IsPathConnected F ↔ PathConnectedSpace ↥F`
Furthermore, it is shown that continuous images and quotients of path-connected sets/spaces are
path-connected, and that every path-connected set/space is also connected.
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology Filter unitInterval Set Function
variable {X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {x y z : X} {ι : Type*}
/-! ### Being joined by a path -/
/-- The relation "being joined by a path". This is an equivalence relation. -/
def Joined (x y : X) : Prop :=
Nonempty (Path x y)
@[refl]
theorem Joined.refl (x : X) : Joined x x :=
⟨Path.refl x⟩
/-- When two points are joined, choose some path from `x` to `y`. -/
def Joined.somePath (h : Joined x y) : Path x y :=
Nonempty.some h
@[symm]
theorem Joined.symm {x y : X} (h : Joined x y) : Joined y x :=
⟨h.somePath.symm⟩
@[trans]
theorem Joined.trans {x y z : X} (hxy : Joined x y) (hyz : Joined y z) : Joined x z :=
⟨hxy.somePath.trans hyz.somePath⟩
variable (X)
/-- The setoid corresponding the equivalence relation of being joined by a continuous path. -/
def pathSetoid : Setoid X where
r := Joined
iseqv := Equivalence.mk Joined.refl Joined.symm Joined.trans
/-- The quotient type of points of a topological space modulo being joined by a continuous path. -/
def ZerothHomotopy :=
Quotient (pathSetoid X)
instance ZerothHomotopy.inhabited : Inhabited (ZerothHomotopy ℝ) :=
⟨@Quotient.mk' ℝ (pathSetoid ℝ) 0⟩
variable {X}
/-! ### Being joined by a path inside a set -/
/-- The relation "being joined by a path in `F`". Not quite an equivalence relation since it's not
reflexive for points that do not belong to `F`. -/
def JoinedIn (F : Set X) (x y : X) : Prop :=
∃ γ : Path x y, ∀ t, γ t ∈ F
variable {F : Set X}
theorem JoinedIn.mem (h : JoinedIn F x y) : x ∈ F ∧ y ∈ F := by
rcases h with ⟨γ, γ_in⟩
have : γ 0 ∈ F ∧ γ 1 ∈ F := by constructor <;> apply γ_in
simpa using this
theorem JoinedIn.source_mem (h : JoinedIn F x y) : x ∈ F :=
h.mem.1
theorem JoinedIn.target_mem (h : JoinedIn F x y) : y ∈ F :=
h.mem.2
/-- When `x` and `y` are joined in `F`, choose a path from `x` to `y` inside `F` -/
def JoinedIn.somePath (h : JoinedIn F x y) : Path x y :=
Classical.choose h
theorem JoinedIn.somePath_mem (h : JoinedIn F x y) (t : I) : h.somePath t ∈ F :=
Classical.choose_spec h t
/-- If `x` and `y` are joined in the set `F`, then they are joined in the subtype `F`. -/
theorem JoinedIn.joined_subtype (h : JoinedIn F x y) :
Joined (⟨x, h.source_mem⟩ : F) (⟨y, h.target_mem⟩ : F) :=
⟨{ toFun := fun t => ⟨h.somePath t, h.somePath_mem t⟩
continuous_toFun := by fun_prop
source' := by simp
target' := by simp }⟩
theorem JoinedIn.ofLine {f : ℝ → X} (hf : ContinuousOn f I) (h₀ : f 0 = x) (h₁ : f 1 = y)
(hF : f '' I ⊆ F) : JoinedIn F x y :=
⟨Path.ofLine hf h₀ h₁, fun t => hF <| Path.ofLine_mem hf h₀ h₁ t⟩
theorem JoinedIn.joined (h : JoinedIn F x y) : Joined x y :=
⟨h.somePath⟩
theorem joinedIn_iff_joined (x_in : x ∈ F) (y_in : y ∈ F) :
JoinedIn F x y ↔ Joined (⟨x, x_in⟩ : F) (⟨y, y_in⟩ : F) :=
⟨fun h => h.joined_subtype, fun h => ⟨h.somePath.map continuous_subtype_val, by simp⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem joinedIn_univ : JoinedIn univ x y ↔ Joined x y := by
simp [JoinedIn, Joined, exists_true_iff_nonempty]
theorem JoinedIn.mono {U V : Set X} (h : JoinedIn U x y) (hUV : U ⊆ V) : JoinedIn V x y :=
⟨h.somePath, fun t => hUV (h.somePath_mem t)⟩
theorem JoinedIn.refl (h : x ∈ F) : JoinedIn F x x :=
⟨Path.refl x, fun _t => h⟩
@[symm]
theorem JoinedIn.symm (h : JoinedIn F x y) : JoinedIn F y x := by
obtain ⟨hx, hy⟩ := h.mem
simp_all only [joinedIn_iff_joined]
exact h.symm
theorem JoinedIn.trans (hxy : JoinedIn F x y) (hyz : JoinedIn F y z) : JoinedIn F x z := by
obtain ⟨hx, hy⟩ := hxy.mem
obtain ⟨hx, hy⟩ := hyz.mem
simp_all only [joinedIn_iff_joined]
exact hxy.trans hyz
theorem Specializes.joinedIn (h : x ⤳ y) (hx : x ∈ F) (hy : y ∈ F) : JoinedIn F x y := by
refine ⟨⟨⟨Set.piecewise {1} (const I y) (const I x), ?_⟩, by simp, by simp⟩, fun t ↦ ?_⟩
· exact isClosed_singleton.continuous_piecewise_of_specializes continuous_const continuous_const
fun _ ↦ h
· simp only [Path.coe_mk_mk, piecewise]
split_ifs <;> assumption
theorem Inseparable.joinedIn (h : Inseparable x y) (hx : x ∈ F) (hy : y ∈ F) : JoinedIn F x y :=
h.specializes.joinedIn hx hy
theorem JoinedIn.map_continuousOn (h : JoinedIn F x y) {f : X → Y} (hf : ContinuousOn f F) :
JoinedIn (f '' F) (f x) (f y) :=
let ⟨γ, hγ⟩ := h
⟨γ.map' <| hf.mono (range_subset_iff.mpr hγ), fun t ↦ mem_image_of_mem _ (hγ t)⟩
theorem JoinedIn.map (h : JoinedIn F x y) {f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f) :
JoinedIn (f '' F) (f x) (f y) :=
h.map_continuousOn hf.continuousOn
theorem Topology.IsInducing.joinedIn_image {f : X → Y} (hf : IsInducing f) (hx : x ∈ F)
(hy : y ∈ F) : JoinedIn (f '' F) (f x) (f y) ↔ JoinedIn F x y := by
refine ⟨?_, (.map · hf.continuous)⟩
rintro ⟨γ, hγ⟩
choose γ' hγ'F hγ' using hγ
have h₀ : x ⤳ γ' 0 := by rw [← hf.specializes_iff, hγ', γ.source]
have h₁ : γ' 1 ⤳ y := by rw [← hf.specializes_iff, hγ', γ.target]
have h : JoinedIn F (γ' 0) (γ' 1) := by
refine ⟨⟨⟨γ', ?_⟩, rfl, rfl⟩, hγ'F⟩
simpa only [hf.continuous_iff, comp_def, hγ'] using map_continuous γ
exact (h₀.joinedIn hx (hγ'F _)).trans <| h.trans <| h₁.joinedIn (hγ'F _) hy
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.joinedIn_image := IsInducing.joinedIn_image
/-! ### Path component -/
/-- The path component of `x` is the set of points that can be joined to `x`. -/
def pathComponent (x : X) :=
{ y | Joined x y }
theorem mem_pathComponent_iff : x ∈ pathComponent y ↔ Joined y x := .rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_pathComponent_self (x : X) : x ∈ pathComponent x :=
Joined.refl x
@[simp]
theorem pathComponent.nonempty (x : X) : (pathComponent x).Nonempty :=
⟨x, mem_pathComponent_self x⟩
theorem mem_pathComponent_of_mem (h : x ∈ pathComponent y) : y ∈ pathComponent x :=
Joined.symm h
theorem pathComponent_symm : x ∈ pathComponent y ↔ y ∈ pathComponent x :=
⟨fun h => mem_pathComponent_of_mem h, fun h => mem_pathComponent_of_mem h⟩
theorem pathComponent_congr (h : x ∈ pathComponent y) : pathComponent x = pathComponent y := by
ext z
constructor
· intro h'
rw [pathComponent_symm]
exact (h.trans h').symm
· intro h'
rw [pathComponent_symm] at h' ⊢
exact h'.trans h
theorem pathComponent_subset_component (x : X) : pathComponent x ⊆ connectedComponent x :=
fun y h =>
(isConnected_range h.somePath.continuous).subset_connectedComponent ⟨0, by simp⟩ ⟨1, by simp⟩
/-- The path component of `x` in `F` is the set of points that can be joined to `x` in `F`. -/
def pathComponentIn (x : X) (F : Set X) :=
{ y | JoinedIn F x y }
@[simp]
theorem pathComponentIn_univ (x : X) : pathComponentIn x univ = pathComponent x := by
simp [pathComponentIn, pathComponent, JoinedIn, Joined, exists_true_iff_nonempty]
theorem Joined.mem_pathComponent (hyz : Joined y z) (hxy : y ∈ pathComponent x) :
z ∈ pathComponent x :=
hxy.trans hyz
theorem mem_pathComponentIn_self (h : x ∈ F) : x ∈ pathComponentIn x F :=
JoinedIn.refl h
theorem pathComponentIn_subset : pathComponentIn x F ⊆ F :=
fun _ hy ↦ hy.target_mem
theorem pathComponentIn_nonempty_iff : (pathComponentIn x F).Nonempty ↔ x ∈ F :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨γ, hγ⟩⟩ ↦ γ.source ▸ hγ 0, fun hx ↦ ⟨x, mem_pathComponentIn_self hx⟩⟩
theorem pathComponentIn_congr (h : x ∈ pathComponentIn y F) :
pathComponentIn x F = pathComponentIn y F := by
ext; exact ⟨h.trans, h.symm.trans⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem pathComponentIn_mono {G : Set X} (h : F ⊆ G) :
pathComponentIn x F ⊆ pathComponentIn x G :=
fun _ ⟨γ, hγ⟩ ↦ ⟨γ, fun t ↦ h (hγ t)⟩
/-! ### Path connected sets -/
/-- A set `F` is path connected if it contains a point that can be joined to all other in `F`. -/
def IsPathConnected (F : Set X) : Prop :=
∃ x ∈ F, ∀ {y}, y ∈ F → JoinedIn F x y
theorem isPathConnected_iff_eq : IsPathConnected F ↔ ∃ x ∈ F, pathComponentIn x F = F := by
constructor <;> rintro ⟨x, x_in, h⟩ <;> use x, x_in
· ext y
exact ⟨fun hy => hy.mem.2, h⟩
· intro y y_in
rwa [← h] at y_in
theorem IsPathConnected.joinedIn (h : IsPathConnected F) :
∀ᵉ (x ∈ F) (y ∈ F), JoinedIn F x y := fun _x x_in _y y_in =>
let ⟨_b, _b_in, hb⟩ := h
(hb x_in).symm.trans (hb y_in)
theorem isPathConnected_iff :
IsPathConnected F ↔ F.Nonempty ∧ ∀ᵉ (x ∈ F) (y ∈ F), JoinedIn F x y :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨let ⟨b, b_in, _hb⟩ := h; ⟨b, b_in⟩, h.joinedIn⟩,
fun ⟨⟨b, b_in⟩, h⟩ => ⟨b, b_in, fun x_in => h _ b_in _ x_in⟩⟩
/-- If `f` is continuous on `F` and `F` is path-connected, so is `f(F)`. -/
theorem IsPathConnected.image' (hF : IsPathConnected F)
{f : X → Y} (hf : ContinuousOn f F) : IsPathConnected (f '' F) := by
rcases hF with ⟨x, x_in, hx⟩
use f x, mem_image_of_mem f x_in
rintro _ ⟨y, y_in, rfl⟩
refine ⟨(hx y_in).somePath.map' ?_, fun t ↦ ⟨_, (hx y_in).somePath_mem t, rfl⟩⟩
exact hf.mono (range_subset_iff.2 (hx y_in).somePath_mem)
/-- If `f` is continuous and `F` is path-connected, so is `f(F)`. -/
theorem IsPathConnected.image (hF : IsPathConnected F) {f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f) :
IsPathConnected (f '' F) :=
hF.image' hf.continuousOn
/-- If `f : X → Y` is an inducing map, `f(F)` is path-connected iff `F` is. -/
nonrec theorem Topology.IsInducing.isPathConnected_iff {f : X → Y} (hf : IsInducing f) :
IsPathConnected F ↔ IsPathConnected (f '' F) := by
simp only [IsPathConnected, forall_mem_image, exists_mem_image]
refine exists_congr fun x ↦ and_congr_right fun hx ↦ forall₂_congr fun y hy ↦ ?_
rw [hf.joinedIn_image hx hy]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")]
alias Inducing.isPathConnected_iff := IsInducing.isPathConnected_iff
/-- If `h : X → Y` is a homeomorphism, `h(s)` is path-connected iff `s` is. -/
@[simp]
theorem Homeomorph.isPathConnected_image {s : Set X} (h : X ≃ₜ Y) :
IsPathConnected (h '' s) ↔ IsPathConnected s :=
h.isInducing.isPathConnected_iff.symm
/-- If `h : X → Y` is a homeomorphism, `h⁻¹(s)` is path-connected iff `s` is. -/
@[simp]
theorem Homeomorph.isPathConnected_preimage {s : Set Y} (h : X ≃ₜ Y) :
IsPathConnected (h ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsPathConnected s := by
rw [← Homeomorph.image_symm]; exact h.symm.isPathConnected_image
theorem IsPathConnected.mem_pathComponent (h : IsPathConnected F) (x_in : x ∈ F) (y_in : y ∈ F) :
y ∈ pathComponent x :=
(h.joinedIn x x_in y y_in).joined
theorem IsPathConnected.subset_pathComponent (h : IsPathConnected F) (x_in : x ∈ F) :
F ⊆ pathComponent x := fun _y y_in => h.mem_pathComponent x_in y_in
theorem IsPathConnected.subset_pathComponentIn {s : Set X} (hs : IsPathConnected s)
(hxs : x ∈ s) (hsF : s ⊆ F) : s ⊆ pathComponentIn x F :=
fun y hys ↦ (hs.joinedIn x hxs y hys).mono hsF
theorem isPathConnected_singleton (x : X) : IsPathConnected ({x} : Set X) := by
refine ⟨x, rfl, ?_⟩
rintro y rfl
exact JoinedIn.refl rfl
theorem isPathConnected_pathComponentIn (h : x ∈ F) : IsPathConnected (pathComponentIn x F) :=
⟨x, mem_pathComponentIn_self h, fun ⟨γ, hγ⟩ ↦ by
refine ⟨γ, fun t ↦
⟨(γ.truncateOfLE t.2.1).cast (γ.extend_zero.symm) (γ.extend_extends' t).symm, fun t' ↦ ?_⟩⟩
dsimp [Path.truncateOfLE, Path.truncate]
exact γ.extend_extends' ⟨min (max t'.1 0) t.1, by simp [t.2.1, t.2.2]⟩ ▸ hγ _⟩
theorem isPathConnected_pathComponent : IsPathConnected (pathComponent x) := by
rw [← pathComponentIn_univ]
exact isPathConnected_pathComponentIn (mem_univ x)
theorem IsPathConnected.union {U V : Set X} (hU : IsPathConnected U) (hV : IsPathConnected V)
(hUV : (U ∩ V).Nonempty) : IsPathConnected (U ∪ V) := by
rcases hUV with ⟨x, xU, xV⟩
use x, Or.inl xU
rintro y (yU | yV)
· exact (hU.joinedIn x xU y yU).mono subset_union_left
· exact (hV.joinedIn x xV y yV).mono subset_union_right
/-- If a set `W` is path-connected, then it is also path-connected when seen as a set in a smaller
ambient type `U` (when `U` contains `W`). -/
theorem IsPathConnected.preimage_coe {U W : Set X} (hW : IsPathConnected W) (hWU : W ⊆ U) :
IsPathConnected (((↑) : U → X) ⁻¹' W) := by
rwa [IsInducing.subtypeVal.isPathConnected_iff, Subtype.image_preimage_val, inter_eq_right.2 hWU]
theorem IsPathConnected.exists_path_through_family {n : ℕ}
{s : Set X} (h : IsPathConnected s) (p : Fin (n + 1) → X) (hp : ∀ i, p i ∈ s) :
∃ γ : Path (p 0) (p n), range γ ⊆ s ∧ ∀ i, p i ∈ range γ := by
let p' : ℕ → X := fun k => if h : k < n + 1 then p ⟨k, h⟩ else p ⟨0, n.zero_lt_succ⟩
obtain ⟨γ, hγ⟩ : ∃ γ : Path (p' 0) (p' n), (∀ i ≤ n, p' i ∈ range γ) ∧ range γ ⊆ s := by
have hp' : ∀ i ≤ n, p' i ∈ s := by
intro i hi
simp [p', Nat.lt_succ_of_le hi, hp]
clear_value p'
clear hp p
induction n with
| zero =>
use Path.refl (p' 0)
constructor
· rintro i hi
rw [Nat.le_zero.mp hi]
exact ⟨0, rfl⟩
· rw [range_subset_iff]
rintro _x
exact hp' 0 le_rfl
| succ n hn =>
rcases hn fun i hi => hp' i <| Nat.le_succ_of_le hi with ⟨γ₀, hγ₀⟩
rcases h.joinedIn (p' n) (hp' n n.le_succ) (p' <| n + 1) (hp' (n + 1) <| le_rfl) with
⟨γ₁, hγ₁⟩
let γ : Path (p' 0) (p' <| n + 1) := γ₀.trans γ₁
use γ
have range_eq : range γ = range γ₀ ∪ range γ₁ := γ₀.trans_range γ₁
constructor
· rintro i hi
by_cases hi' : i ≤ n
· rw [range_eq]
left
exact hγ₀.1 i hi'
· rw [not_le, ← Nat.succ_le_iff] at hi'
have : i = n.succ := le_antisymm hi hi'
rw [this]
use 1
exact γ.target
· rw [range_eq]
apply union_subset hγ₀.2
rw [range_subset_iff]
exact hγ₁
have hpp' : ∀ k < n + 1, p k = p' k := by
intro k hk
simp only [p', hk, dif_pos]
congr
ext
rw [Fin.val_cast_of_lt hk]
use γ.cast (hpp' 0 n.zero_lt_succ) (hpp' n n.lt_succ_self)
simp only [γ.cast_coe]
refine And.intro hγ.2 ?_
rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
suffices p ⟨i, hi⟩ = p' i by convert hγ.1 i (Nat.le_of_lt_succ hi)
rw [← hpp' i hi]
suffices i = i % n.succ by congr
rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hi]
theorem IsPathConnected.exists_path_through_family' {n : ℕ}
{s : Set X} (h : IsPathConnected s) (p : Fin (n + 1) → X) (hp : ∀ i, p i ∈ s) :
∃ (γ : Path (p 0) (p n)) (t : Fin (n + 1) → I), (∀ t, γ t ∈ s) ∧ ∀ i, γ (t i) = p i := by
rcases h.exists_path_through_family p hp with ⟨γ, hγ⟩
rcases hγ with ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
simp only [range, mem_setOf_eq] at h₂
rw [range_subset_iff] at h₁
choose! t ht using h₂
exact ⟨γ, t, h₁, ht⟩
/-! ### Path connected spaces -/
/-- A topological space is path-connected if it is non-empty and every two points can be
joined by a continuous path. -/
@[mk_iff]
class PathConnectedSpace (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] : Prop where
/-- A path-connected space must be nonempty. -/
nonempty : Nonempty X
/-- Any two points in a path-connected space must be joined by a continuous path. -/
joined : ∀ x y : X, Joined x y
theorem pathConnectedSpace_iff_zerothHomotopy :
PathConnectedSpace X ↔ Nonempty (ZerothHomotopy X) ∧ Subsingleton (ZerothHomotopy X) := by
letI := pathSetoid X
constructor
· intro h
refine ⟨(nonempty_quotient_iff _).mpr h.1, ⟨?_⟩⟩
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩
exact Quotient.sound (PathConnectedSpace.joined x y)
· unfold ZerothHomotopy
rintro ⟨h, h'⟩
exact ⟨(nonempty_quotient_iff _).mp h, fun x y => Quotient.exact <| Subsingleton.elim ⟦x⟧ ⟦y⟧⟩
namespace PathConnectedSpace
variable [PathConnectedSpace X]
/-- Use path-connectedness to build a path between two points. -/
def somePath (x y : X) : Path x y :=
Nonempty.some (joined x y)
end PathConnectedSpace
theorem pathConnectedSpace_iff_univ : PathConnectedSpace X ↔ IsPathConnected (univ : Set X) := by
simp [pathConnectedSpace_iff, isPathConnected_iff, nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty]
theorem isPathConnected_iff_pathConnectedSpace : IsPathConnected F ↔ PathConnectedSpace F := by
rw [pathConnectedSpace_iff_univ, IsInducing.subtypeVal.isPathConnected_iff, image_univ,
Subtype.range_val_subtype, setOf_mem_eq]
theorem isPathConnected_univ [PathConnectedSpace X] : IsPathConnected (univ : Set X) :=
pathConnectedSpace_iff_univ.mp inferInstance
theorem isPathConnected_range [PathConnectedSpace X] {f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f) :
IsPathConnected (range f) := by
rw [← image_univ]
exact isPathConnected_univ.image hf
theorem Function.Surjective.pathConnectedSpace [PathConnectedSpace X]
{f : X → Y} (hf : Surjective f) (hf' : Continuous f) : PathConnectedSpace Y := by
rw [pathConnectedSpace_iff_univ, ← hf.range_eq]
exact isPathConnected_range hf'
instance Quotient.instPathConnectedSpace {s : Setoid X} [PathConnectedSpace X] :
PathConnectedSpace (Quotient s) :=
Quotient.mk'_surjective.pathConnectedSpace continuous_coinduced_rng
/-- This is a special case of `NormedSpace.instPathConnectedSpace` (and
`IsTopologicalAddGroup.pathConnectedSpace`). It exists only to simplify dependencies. -/
instance Real.instPathConnectedSpace : PathConnectedSpace ℝ where
joined x y := ⟨⟨⟨fun (t : I) ↦ (1 - t) * x + t * y, by fun_prop⟩, by simp, by simp⟩⟩
nonempty := inferInstance
theorem pathConnectedSpace_iff_eq : PathConnectedSpace X ↔ ∃ x : X, pathComponent x = univ := by
simp [pathConnectedSpace_iff_univ, isPathConnected_iff_eq]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) PathConnectedSpace.connectedSpace [PathConnectedSpace X] :
ConnectedSpace X := by
rw [connectedSpace_iff_connectedComponent]
rcases isPathConnected_iff_eq.mp (pathConnectedSpace_iff_univ.mp ‹_›) with ⟨x, _x_in, hx⟩
use x
rw [← univ_subset_iff]
exact (by simpa using hx : pathComponent x = univ) ▸ pathComponent_subset_component x
theorem IsPathConnected.isConnected (hF : IsPathConnected F) : IsConnected F := by
rw [isConnected_iff_connectedSpace]
rw [isPathConnected_iff_pathConnectedSpace] at hF
exact @PathConnectedSpace.connectedSpace _ _ hF
namespace PathConnectedSpace
variable [PathConnectedSpace X]
theorem exists_path_through_family {n : ℕ} (p : Fin (n + 1) → X) :
∃ γ : Path (p 0) (p n), ∀ i, p i ∈ range γ := by
have : IsPathConnected (univ : Set X) := pathConnectedSpace_iff_univ.mp (by infer_instance)
rcases this.exists_path_through_family p fun _i => True.intro with ⟨γ, -, h⟩
exact ⟨γ, h⟩
theorem exists_path_through_family' {n : ℕ} (p : Fin (n + 1) → X) :
∃ (γ : Path (p 0) (p n)) (t : Fin (n + 1) → I), ∀ i, γ (t i) = p i := by
have : IsPathConnected (univ : Set X) := pathConnectedSpace_iff_univ.mp (by infer_instance)
rcases this.exists_path_through_family' p fun _i => True.intro with ⟨γ, t, -, h⟩
exact ⟨γ, t, h⟩
end PathConnectedSpace
| Mathlib/Topology/Connected/PathConnected.lean | 1,046 | 1,051 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Yury Kudryashov, Sébastien Gouëzel, Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.Rev
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Find
/-!
# Operation on tuples
We interpret maps `∀ i : Fin n, α i` as `n`-tuples of elements of possibly varying type `α i`,
`(α 0, …, α (n-1))`. A particular case is `Fin n → α` of elements with all the same type.
In this case when `α i` is a constant map, then tuples are isomorphic (but not definitionally equal)
to `Vector`s.
## Main declarations
There are three (main) ways to consider `Fin n` as a subtype of `Fin (n + 1)`, hence three (main)
ways to move between tuples of length `n` and of length `n + 1` by adding/removing an entry.
### Adding at the start
* `Fin.succ`: Send `i : Fin n` to `i + 1 : Fin (n + 1)`. This is defined in Core.
* `Fin.cases`: Induction/recursion principle for `Fin`: To prove a property/define a function for
all `Fin (n + 1)`, it is enough to prove/define it for `0` and for `i.succ` for all `i : Fin n`.
This is defined in Core.
* `Fin.cons`: Turn a tuple `f : Fin n → α` and an entry `a : α` into a tuple
`Fin.cons a f : Fin (n + 1) → α` by adding `a` at the start. In general, tuples can be dependent
functions, in which case `f : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ` and `a : α 0`. This is a special case of
`Fin.cases`.
* `Fin.tail`: Turn a tuple `f : Fin (n + 1) → α` into a tuple `Fin.tail f : Fin n → α` by forgetting
the start. In general, tuples can be dependent functions,
in which case `Fin.tail f : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ`.
### Adding at the end
* `Fin.castSucc`: Send `i : Fin n` to `i : Fin (n + 1)`. This is defined in Core.
* `Fin.lastCases`: Induction/recursion principle for `Fin`: To prove a property/define a function
for all `Fin (n + 1)`, it is enough to prove/define it for `last n` and for `i.castSucc` for all
`i : Fin n`. This is defined in Core.
* `Fin.snoc`: Turn a tuple `f : Fin n → α` and an entry `a : α` into a tuple
`Fin.snoc f a : Fin (n + 1) → α` by adding `a` at the end. In general, tuples can be dependent
functions, in which case `f : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.castSucc` and `a : α (last n)`. This is a
special case of `Fin.lastCases`.
* `Fin.init`: Turn a tuple `f : Fin (n + 1) → α` into a tuple `Fin.init f : Fin n → α` by forgetting
the start. In general, tuples can be dependent functions,
in which case `Fin.init f : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.castSucc`.
### Adding in the middle
For a **pivot** `p : Fin (n + 1)`,
* `Fin.succAbove`: Send `i : Fin n` to
* `i : Fin (n + 1)` if `i < p`,
* `i + 1 : Fin (n + 1)` if `p ≤ i`.
* `Fin.succAboveCases`: Induction/recursion principle for `Fin`: To prove a property/define a
function for all `Fin (n + 1)`, it is enough to prove/define it for `p` and for `p.succAbove i`
for all `i : Fin n`.
* `Fin.insertNth`: Turn a tuple `f : Fin n → α` and an entry `a : α` into a tuple
`Fin.insertNth f a : Fin (n + 1) → α` by adding `a` in position `p`. In general, tuples can be
dependent functions, in which case `f : ∀ i : Fin n, α (p.succAbove i)` and `a : α p`. This is a
special case of `Fin.succAboveCases`.
* `Fin.removeNth`: Turn a tuple `f : Fin (n + 1) → α` into a tuple `Fin.removeNth p f : Fin n → α`
by forgetting the `p`-th value. In general, tuples can be dependent functions,
in which case `Fin.removeNth f : ∀ i : Fin n, α (succAbove p i)`.
`p = 0` means we add at the start. `p = last n` means we add at the end.
### Miscellaneous
* `Fin.find p` : returns the first index `n` where `p n` is satisfied, and `none` if it is never
satisfied.
* `Fin.append a b` : append two tuples.
* `Fin.repeat n a` : repeat a tuple `n` times.
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid
universe u v
namespace Fin
variable {m n : ℕ}
open Function
section Tuple
/-- There is exactly one tuple of size zero. -/
example (α : Fin 0 → Sort u) : Unique (∀ i : Fin 0, α i) := by infer_instance
theorem tuple0_le {α : Fin 0 → Type*} [∀ i, Preorder (α i)] (f g : ∀ i, α i) : f ≤ g :=
finZeroElim
variable {α : Fin (n + 1) → Sort u} (x : α 0) (q : ∀ i, α i) (p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ) (i : Fin n)
(y : α i.succ) (z : α 0)
/-- The tail of an `n+1` tuple, i.e., its last `n` entries. -/
def tail (q : ∀ i, α i) : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ := fun i ↦ q i.succ
theorem tail_def {n : ℕ} {α : Fin (n + 1) → Sort*} {q : ∀ i, α i} :
(tail fun k : Fin (n + 1) ↦ q k) = fun k : Fin n ↦ q k.succ :=
rfl
/-- Adding an element at the beginning of an `n`-tuple, to get an `n+1`-tuple. -/
def cons (x : α 0) (p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ) : ∀ i, α i := fun j ↦ Fin.cases x p j
@[simp]
theorem tail_cons : tail (cons x p) = p := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp [tail, cons]
@[simp]
theorem cons_succ : cons x p i.succ = p i := by simp [cons]
@[simp]
theorem cons_zero : cons x p 0 = x := by simp [cons]
@[simp]
theorem cons_one {α : Fin (n + 2) → Sort*} (x : α 0) (p : ∀ i : Fin n.succ, α i.succ) :
cons x p 1 = p 0 := by
rw [← cons_succ x p]; rfl
/-- Updating a tuple and adding an element at the beginning commute. -/
@[simp]
theorem cons_update : cons x (update p i y) = update (cons x p) i.succ y := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = 0
· rw [h]
simp [Ne.symm (succ_ne_zero i)]
· let j' := pred j h
have : j'.succ = j := succ_pred j h
rw [← this, cons_succ]
by_cases h' : j' = i
· rw [h']
simp
· have : j'.succ ≠ i.succ := by rwa [Ne, succ_inj]
rw [update_of_ne h', update_of_ne this, cons_succ]
/-- As a binary function, `Fin.cons` is injective. -/
theorem cons_injective2 : Function.Injective2 (@cons n α) := fun x₀ y₀ x y h ↦
⟨congr_fun h 0, funext fun i ↦ by simpa using congr_fun h (Fin.succ i)⟩
@[simp]
theorem cons_inj {x₀ y₀ : α 0} {x y : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ} :
cons x₀ x = cons y₀ y ↔ x₀ = y₀ ∧ x = y :=
cons_injective2.eq_iff
theorem cons_left_injective (x : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ) : Function.Injective fun x₀ ↦ cons x₀ x :=
cons_injective2.left _
theorem cons_right_injective (x₀ : α 0) : Function.Injective (cons x₀) :=
cons_injective2.right _
/-- Adding an element at the beginning of a tuple and then updating it amounts to adding it
directly. -/
theorem update_cons_zero : update (cons x p) 0 z = cons z p := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = 0
· rw [h]
simp
· simp only [h, update_of_ne, Ne, not_false_iff]
let j' := pred j h
have : j'.succ = j := succ_pred j h
rw [← this, cons_succ, cons_succ]
/-- Concatenating the first element of a tuple with its tail gives back the original tuple -/
@[simp]
theorem cons_self_tail : cons (q 0) (tail q) = q := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = 0
· rw [h]
simp
· let j' := pred j h
have : j'.succ = j := succ_pred j h
rw [← this]
unfold tail
rw [cons_succ]
/-- Equivalence between tuples of length `n + 1` and pairs of an element and a tuple of length `n`
given by separating out the first element of the tuple.
This is `Fin.cons` as an `Equiv`. -/
@[simps]
def consEquiv (α : Fin (n + 1) → Type*) : α 0 × (∀ i, α (succ i)) ≃ ∀ i, α i where
toFun f := cons f.1 f.2
invFun f := (f 0, tail f)
left_inv f := by simp
right_inv f := by simp
/-- Recurse on an `n+1`-tuple by splitting it into a single element and an `n`-tuple. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def consCases {P : (∀ i : Fin n.succ, α i) → Sort v} (h : ∀ x₀ x, P (Fin.cons x₀ x))
(x : ∀ i : Fin n.succ, α i) : P x :=
_root_.cast (by rw [cons_self_tail]) <| h (x 0) (tail x)
@[simp]
theorem consCases_cons {P : (∀ i : Fin n.succ, α i) → Sort v} (h : ∀ x₀ x, P (Fin.cons x₀ x))
(x₀ : α 0) (x : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ) : @consCases _ _ _ h (cons x₀ x) = h x₀ x := by
rw [consCases, cast_eq]
congr
/-- Recurse on a tuple by splitting into `Fin.elim0` and `Fin.cons`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def consInduction {α : Sort*} {P : ∀ {n : ℕ}, (Fin n → α) → Sort v} (h0 : P Fin.elim0)
(h : ∀ {n} (x₀) (x : Fin n → α), P x → P (Fin.cons x₀ x)) : ∀ {n : ℕ} (x : Fin n → α), P x
| 0, x => by convert h0
| _ + 1, x => consCases (fun _ _ ↦ h _ _ <| consInduction h0 h _) x
theorem cons_injective_of_injective {α} {x₀ : α} {x : Fin n → α} (hx₀ : x₀ ∉ Set.range x)
(hx : Function.Injective x) : Function.Injective (cons x₀ x : Fin n.succ → α) := by
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_
· refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_
· intro
rfl
· intro j h
rw [cons_zero, cons_succ] at h
exact hx₀.elim ⟨_, h.symm⟩
· intro i
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_
· intro h
rw [cons_zero, cons_succ] at h
exact hx₀.elim ⟨_, h⟩
· intro j h
rw [cons_succ, cons_succ] at h
exact congr_arg _ (hx h)
theorem cons_injective_iff {α} {x₀ : α} {x : Fin n → α} :
Function.Injective (cons x₀ x : Fin n.succ → α) ↔ x₀ ∉ Set.range x ∧ Function.Injective x := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨?_, ?_⟩, fun h ↦ cons_injective_of_injective h.1 h.2⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
replace h := @h i.succ 0
simp [hi] at h
· simpa [Function.comp] using h.comp (Fin.succ_injective _)
@[simp]
theorem forall_fin_zero_pi {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} {P : (∀ i, α i) → Prop} :
(∀ x, P x) ↔ P finZeroElim :=
⟨fun h ↦ h _, fun h x ↦ Subsingleton.elim finZeroElim x ▸ h⟩
@[simp]
theorem exists_fin_zero_pi {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} {P : (∀ i, α i) → Prop} :
(∃ x, P x) ↔ P finZeroElim :=
⟨fun ⟨x, h⟩ ↦ Subsingleton.elim x finZeroElim ▸ h, fun h ↦ ⟨_, h⟩⟩
theorem forall_fin_succ_pi {P : (∀ i, α i) → Prop} : (∀ x, P x) ↔ ∀ a v, P (Fin.cons a v) :=
⟨fun h a v ↦ h (Fin.cons a v), consCases⟩
theorem exists_fin_succ_pi {P : (∀ i, α i) → Prop} : (∃ x, P x) ↔ ∃ a v, P (Fin.cons a v) :=
⟨fun ⟨x, h⟩ ↦ ⟨x 0, tail x, (cons_self_tail x).symm ▸ h⟩, fun ⟨_, _, h⟩ ↦ ⟨_, h⟩⟩
/-- Updating the first element of a tuple does not change the tail. -/
@[simp]
theorem tail_update_zero : tail (update q 0 z) = tail q := by
ext j
simp [tail]
/-- Updating a nonzero element and taking the tail commute. -/
@[simp]
theorem tail_update_succ : tail (update q i.succ y) = update (tail q) i y := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = i
· rw [h]
simp [tail]
· simp [tail, (Fin.succ_injective n).ne h, h]
theorem comp_cons {α : Sort*} {β : Sort*} (g : α → β) (y : α) (q : Fin n → α) :
g ∘ cons y q = cons (g y) (g ∘ q) := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = 0
· rw [h]
rfl
· let j' := pred j h
have : j'.succ = j := succ_pred j h
rw [← this, cons_succ, comp_apply, comp_apply, cons_succ]
theorem comp_tail {α : Sort*} {β : Sort*} (g : α → β) (q : Fin n.succ → α) :
g ∘ tail q = tail (g ∘ q) := by
ext j
simp [tail]
section Preorder
variable {α : Fin (n + 1) → Type*}
theorem le_cons [∀ i, Preorder (α i)] {x : α 0} {q : ∀ i, α i} {p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ} :
q ≤ cons x p ↔ q 0 ≤ x ∧ tail q ≤ p :=
forall_fin_succ.trans <| and_congr Iff.rfl <| forall_congr' fun j ↦ by simp [tail]
theorem cons_le [∀ i, Preorder (α i)] {x : α 0} {q : ∀ i, α i} {p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ} :
cons x p ≤ q ↔ x ≤ q 0 ∧ p ≤ tail q :=
@le_cons _ (fun i ↦ (α i)ᵒᵈ) _ x q p
theorem cons_le_cons [∀ i, Preorder (α i)] {x₀ y₀ : α 0} {x y : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ} :
cons x₀ x ≤ cons y₀ y ↔ x₀ ≤ y₀ ∧ x ≤ y :=
forall_fin_succ.trans <| and_congr_right' <| by simp only [cons_succ, Pi.le_def]
end Preorder
theorem range_fin_succ {α} (f : Fin (n + 1) → α) :
Set.range f = insert (f 0) (Set.range (Fin.tail f)) :=
Set.ext fun _ ↦ exists_fin_succ.trans <| eq_comm.or Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem range_cons {α} {n : ℕ} (x : α) (b : Fin n → α) :
Set.range (Fin.cons x b : Fin n.succ → α) = insert x (Set.range b) := by
rw [range_fin_succ, cons_zero, tail_cons]
section Append
variable {α : Sort*}
/-- Append a tuple of length `m` to a tuple of length `n` to get a tuple of length `m + n`.
This is a non-dependent version of `Fin.add_cases`. -/
def append (a : Fin m → α) (b : Fin n → α) : Fin (m + n) → α :=
@Fin.addCases _ _ (fun _ => α) a b
@[simp]
theorem append_left (u : Fin m → α) (v : Fin n → α) (i : Fin m) :
append u v (Fin.castAdd n i) = u i :=
addCases_left _
@[simp]
theorem append_right (u : Fin m → α) (v : Fin n → α) (i : Fin n) :
append u v (natAdd m i) = v i :=
addCases_right _
theorem append_right_nil (u : Fin m → α) (v : Fin n → α) (hv : n = 0) :
append u v = u ∘ Fin.cast (by rw [hv, Nat.add_zero]) := by
refine funext (Fin.addCases (fun l => ?_) fun r => ?_)
· rw [append_left, Function.comp_apply]
refine congr_arg u (Fin.ext ?_)
simp
· exact (Fin.cast hv r).elim0
@[simp]
theorem append_elim0 (u : Fin m → α) :
append u Fin.elim0 = u ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.add_zero _) :=
append_right_nil _ _ rfl
theorem append_left_nil (u : Fin m → α) (v : Fin n → α) (hu : m = 0) :
append u v = v ∘ Fin.cast (by rw [hu, Nat.zero_add]) := by
refine funext (Fin.addCases (fun l => ?_) fun r => ?_)
· exact (Fin.cast hu l).elim0
· rw [append_right, Function.comp_apply]
refine congr_arg v (Fin.ext ?_)
simp [hu]
@[simp]
theorem elim0_append (v : Fin n → α) :
append Fin.elim0 v = v ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.zero_add _) :=
append_left_nil _ _ rfl
theorem append_assoc {p : ℕ} (a : Fin m → α) (b : Fin n → α) (c : Fin p → α) :
append (append a b) c = append a (append b c) ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.add_assoc ..) := by
ext i
rw [Function.comp_apply]
refine Fin.addCases (fun l => ?_) (fun r => ?_) i
· rw [append_left]
refine Fin.addCases (fun ll => ?_) (fun lr => ?_) l
· rw [append_left]
simp [castAdd_castAdd]
· rw [append_right]
simp [castAdd_natAdd]
· rw [append_right]
simp [← natAdd_natAdd]
/-- Appending a one-tuple to the left is the same as `Fin.cons`. -/
theorem append_left_eq_cons {n : ℕ} (x₀ : Fin 1 → α) (x : Fin n → α) :
Fin.append x₀ x = Fin.cons (x₀ 0) x ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.add_comm ..) := by
ext i
refine Fin.addCases ?_ ?_ i <;> clear i
· intro i
rw [Subsingleton.elim i 0, Fin.append_left, Function.comp_apply, eq_comm]
exact Fin.cons_zero _ _
· intro i
rw [Fin.append_right, Function.comp_apply, Fin.cast_natAdd, eq_comm, Fin.addNat_one]
exact Fin.cons_succ _ _ _
/-- `Fin.cons` is the same as appending a one-tuple to the left. -/
theorem cons_eq_append (x : α) (xs : Fin n → α) :
cons x xs = append (cons x Fin.elim0) xs ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.add_comm ..) := by
funext i; simp [append_left_eq_cons]
@[simp] lemma append_cast_left {n m} (xs : Fin n → α) (ys : Fin m → α) (n' : ℕ)
(h : n' = n) :
Fin.append (xs ∘ Fin.cast h) ys = Fin.append xs ys ∘ (Fin.cast <| by rw [h]) := by
subst h; simp
@[simp] lemma append_cast_right {n m} (xs : Fin n → α) (ys : Fin m → α) (m' : ℕ)
(h : m' = m) :
Fin.append xs (ys ∘ Fin.cast h) = Fin.append xs ys ∘ (Fin.cast <| by rw [h]) := by
subst h; simp
lemma append_rev {m n} (xs : Fin m → α) (ys : Fin n → α) (i : Fin (m + n)) :
append xs ys (rev i) = append (ys ∘ rev) (xs ∘ rev) (i.cast (Nat.add_comm ..)) := by
rcases rev_surjective i with ⟨i, rfl⟩
rw [rev_rev]
induction i using Fin.addCases
· simp [rev_castAdd]
· simp [cast_rev, rev_addNat]
lemma append_comp_rev {m n} (xs : Fin m → α) (ys : Fin n → α) :
append xs ys ∘ rev = append (ys ∘ rev) (xs ∘ rev) ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.add_comm ..) :=
funext <| append_rev xs ys
theorem append_castAdd_natAdd {f : Fin (m + n) → α} :
append (fun i ↦ f (castAdd n i)) (fun i ↦ f (natAdd m i)) = f := by
unfold append addCases
simp
end Append
section Repeat
variable {α : Sort*}
/-- Repeat `a` `m` times. For example `Fin.repeat 2 ![0, 3, 7] = ![0, 3, 7, 0, 3, 7]`. -/
def «repeat» (m : ℕ) (a : Fin n → α) : Fin (m * n) → α
| i => a i.modNat
@[simp]
theorem repeat_apply (a : Fin n → α) (i : Fin (m * n)) :
Fin.repeat m a i = a i.modNat :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem repeat_zero (a : Fin n → α) :
Fin.repeat 0 a = Fin.elim0 ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.zero_mul _) :=
funext fun x => (x.cast (Nat.zero_mul _)).elim0
@[simp]
theorem repeat_one (a : Fin n → α) : Fin.repeat 1 a = a ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.one_mul _) := by
generalize_proofs h
apply funext
rw [(Fin.rightInverse_cast h.symm).surjective.forall]
intro i
simp [modNat, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt i.is_lt]
theorem repeat_succ (a : Fin n → α) (m : ℕ) :
Fin.repeat m.succ a =
append a (Fin.repeat m a) ∘ Fin.cast ((Nat.succ_mul _ _).trans (Nat.add_comm ..)) := by
generalize_proofs h
apply funext
rw [(Fin.rightInverse_cast h.symm).surjective.forall]
refine Fin.addCases (fun l => ?_) fun r => ?_
· simp [modNat, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt l.is_lt]
· simp [modNat]
@[simp]
theorem repeat_add (a : Fin n → α) (m₁ m₂ : ℕ) : Fin.repeat (m₁ + m₂) a =
append (Fin.repeat m₁ a) (Fin.repeat m₂ a) ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.add_mul ..) := by
generalize_proofs h
apply funext
rw [(Fin.rightInverse_cast h.symm).surjective.forall]
refine Fin.addCases (fun l => ?_) fun r => ?_
· simp [modNat, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt l.is_lt]
· simp [modNat, Nat.add_mod]
theorem repeat_rev (a : Fin n → α) (k : Fin (m * n)) :
Fin.repeat m a k.rev = Fin.repeat m (a ∘ Fin.rev) k :=
congr_arg a k.modNat_rev
theorem repeat_comp_rev (a : Fin n → α) :
Fin.repeat m a ∘ Fin.rev = Fin.repeat m (a ∘ Fin.rev) :=
funext <| repeat_rev a
end Repeat
end Tuple
section TupleRight
/-! In the previous section, we have discussed inserting or removing elements on the left of a
tuple. In this section, we do the same on the right. A difference is that `Fin (n+1)` is constructed
inductively from `Fin n` starting from the left, not from the right. This implies that Lean needs
more help to realize that elements belong to the right types, i.e., we need to insert casts at
several places. -/
variable {α : Fin (n + 1) → Sort*} (x : α (last n)) (q : ∀ i, α i)
(p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.castSucc) (i : Fin n) (y : α i.castSucc) (z : α (last n))
/-- The beginning of an `n+1` tuple, i.e., its first `n` entries -/
def init (q : ∀ i, α i) (i : Fin n) : α i.castSucc :=
q i.castSucc
theorem init_def {q : ∀ i, α i} :
(init fun k : Fin (n + 1) ↦ q k) = fun k : Fin n ↦ q k.castSucc :=
rfl
/-- Adding an element at the end of an `n`-tuple, to get an `n+1`-tuple. The name `snoc` comes from
`cons` (i.e., adding an element to the left of a tuple) read in reverse order. -/
def snoc (p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.castSucc) (x : α (last n)) (i : Fin (n + 1)) : α i :=
if h : i.val < n then _root_.cast (by rw [Fin.castSucc_castLT i h]) (p (castLT i h))
else _root_.cast (by rw [eq_last_of_not_lt h]) x
@[simp]
theorem init_snoc : init (snoc p x) = p := by
ext i
simp only [init, snoc, coe_castSucc, is_lt, cast_eq, dite_true]
convert cast_eq rfl (p i)
@[simp]
theorem snoc_castSucc : snoc p x i.castSucc = p i := by
simp only [snoc, coe_castSucc, is_lt, cast_eq, dite_true]
convert cast_eq rfl (p i)
@[simp]
theorem snoc_comp_castSucc {α : Sort*} {a : α} {f : Fin n → α} :
(snoc f a : Fin (n + 1) → α) ∘ castSucc = f :=
funext fun i ↦ by rw [Function.comp_apply, snoc_castSucc]
@[simp]
theorem snoc_last : snoc p x (last n) = x := by simp [snoc]
lemma snoc_zero {α : Sort*} (p : Fin 0 → α) (x : α) :
Fin.snoc p x = fun _ ↦ x := by
ext y
have : Subsingleton (Fin (0 + 1)) := Fin.subsingleton_one
simp only [Subsingleton.elim y (Fin.last 0), snoc_last]
@[simp]
theorem snoc_comp_nat_add {n m : ℕ} {α : Sort*} (f : Fin (m + n) → α) (a : α) :
(snoc f a : Fin _ → α) ∘ (natAdd m : Fin (n + 1) → Fin (m + n + 1)) =
snoc (f ∘ natAdd m) a := by
ext i
refine Fin.lastCases ?_ (fun i ↦ ?_) i
· simp only [Function.comp_apply]
rw [snoc_last, natAdd_last, snoc_last]
· simp only [comp_apply, snoc_castSucc]
rw [natAdd_castSucc, snoc_castSucc]
@[simp]
theorem snoc_cast_add {α : Fin (n + m + 1) → Sort*} (f : ∀ i : Fin (n + m), α i.castSucc)
(a : α (last (n + m))) (i : Fin n) : (snoc f a) (castAdd (m + 1) i) = f (castAdd m i) :=
dif_pos _
@[simp]
theorem snoc_comp_cast_add {n m : ℕ} {α : Sort*} (f : Fin (n + m) → α) (a : α) :
(snoc f a : Fin _ → α) ∘ castAdd (m + 1) = f ∘ castAdd m :=
funext (snoc_cast_add _ _)
/-- Updating a tuple and adding an element at the end commute. -/
@[simp]
theorem snoc_update : snoc (update p i y) x = update (snoc p x) i.castSucc y := by
ext j
cases j using lastCases with
| cast j => rcases eq_or_ne j i with rfl | hne <;> simp [*]
| last => simp [Ne.symm]
/-- Adding an element at the beginning of a tuple and then updating it amounts to adding it
directly. -/
theorem update_snoc_last : update (snoc p x) (last n) z = snoc p z := by
ext j
| cases j using lastCases <;> simp
| Mathlib/Data/Fin/Tuple/Basic.lean | 556 | 556 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Countable.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Order.Disjointed
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.ENNReal.Lemmas
/-!
# Outer Measures
An outer measure is a function `μ : Set α → ℝ≥0∞`, from the powerset of a type to the extended
nonnegative real numbers that satisfies the following conditions:
1. `μ ∅ = 0`;
2. `μ` is monotone;
3. `μ` is countably subadditive. This means that the outer measure of a countable union is at most
the sum of the outer measure on the individual sets.
Note that we do not need `α` to be measurable to define an outer measure.
## References
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outer_measure>
## Tags
outer measure
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Filter
open scoped NNReal Topology ENNReal
namespace MeasureTheory
section OuterMeasureClass
variable {α ι F : Type*} [FunLike F (Set α) ℝ≥0∞] [OuterMeasureClass F α]
{μ : F} {s t : Set α}
@[simp]
theorem measure_empty : μ ∅ = 0 := OuterMeasureClass.measure_empty μ
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem measure_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : μ s ≤ μ t :=
OuterMeasureClass.measure_mono μ h
theorem measure_mono_null (h : s ⊆ t) (ht : μ t = 0) : μ s = 0 :=
eq_bot_mono (measure_mono h) ht
lemma measure_eq_top_mono (h : s ⊆ t) (hs : μ s = ∞) : μ t = ∞ := eq_top_mono (measure_mono h) hs
lemma measure_lt_top_mono (h : s ⊆ t) (ht : μ t < ∞) : μ s < ∞ := (measure_mono h).trans_lt ht
theorem measure_pos_of_superset (h : s ⊆ t) (hs : μ s ≠ 0) : 0 < μ t :=
hs.bot_lt.trans_le (measure_mono h)
theorem measure_iUnion_le [Countable ι] (s : ι → Set α) : μ (⋃ i, s i) ≤ ∑' i, μ (s i) := by
refine rel_iSup_tsum μ measure_empty (· ≤ ·) (fun t ↦ ?_) _
calc
μ (⋃ i, t i) = μ (⋃ i, disjointed t i) := by rw [iUnion_disjointed]
_ ≤ ∑' i, μ (disjointed t i) :=
OuterMeasureClass.measure_iUnion_nat_le _ _ (disjoint_disjointed _)
_ ≤ ∑' i, μ (t i) := by gcongr; exact disjointed_subset ..
theorem measure_biUnion_le {I : Set ι} (μ : F) (hI : I.Countable) (s : ι → Set α) :
μ (⋃ i ∈ I, s i) ≤ ∑' i : I, μ (s i) := by
have := hI.to_subtype
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply measure_iUnion_le
theorem measure_biUnion_finset_le (I : Finset ι) (s : ι → Set α) :
μ (⋃ i ∈ I, s i) ≤ ∑ i ∈ I, μ (s i) :=
(measure_biUnion_le μ I.countable_toSet s).trans_eq <| I.tsum_subtype (μ <| s ·)
theorem measure_iUnion_fintype_le [Fintype ι] (μ : F) (s : ι → Set α) :
μ (⋃ i, s i) ≤ ∑ i, μ (s i) := by
simpa using measure_biUnion_finset_le Finset.univ s
theorem measure_union_le (s t : Set α) : μ (s ∪ t) ≤ μ s + μ t := by
simpa [union_eq_iUnion] using measure_iUnion_fintype_le μ (cond · s t)
lemma measure_univ_le_add_compl (s : Set α) : μ univ ≤ μ s + μ sᶜ :=
s.union_compl_self ▸ measure_union_le s sᶜ
theorem measure_le_inter_add_diff (μ : F) (s t : Set α) : μ s ≤ μ (s ∩ t) + μ (s \ t) := by
simpa using measure_union_le (s ∩ t) (s \ t)
theorem measure_diff_null (ht : μ t = 0) : μ (s \ t) = μ s :=
(measure_mono diff_subset).antisymm <| calc
μ s ≤ μ (s ∩ t) + μ (s \ t) := measure_le_inter_add_diff _ _ _
_ ≤ μ t + μ (s \ t) := by gcongr; apply inter_subset_right
_ = μ (s \ t) := by simp [ht]
theorem measure_biUnion_null_iff {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Countable) {s : ι → Set α} :
μ (⋃ i ∈ I, s i) = 0 ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, μ (s i) = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h i hi ↦ measure_mono_null (subset_biUnion_of_mem hi) h, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
have _ := hI.to_subtype
simpa [h] using measure_iUnion_le (μ := μ) fun x : I ↦ s x
theorem measure_sUnion_null_iff {S : Set (Set α)} (hS : S.Countable) :
μ (⋃₀ S) = 0 ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, μ s = 0 := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, measure_biUnion_null_iff hS]
@[simp]
theorem measure_iUnion_null_iff {ι : Sort*} [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} :
μ (⋃ i, s i) = 0 ↔ ∀ i, μ (s i) = 0 := by
rw [← sUnion_range, measure_sUnion_null_iff (countable_range s), forall_mem_range]
alias ⟨_, measure_iUnion_null⟩ := measure_iUnion_null_iff
@[simp]
theorem measure_union_null_iff : μ (s ∪ t) = 0 ↔ μ s = 0 ∧ μ t = 0 := by
simp [union_eq_iUnion, and_comm]
theorem measure_union_null (hs : μ s = 0) (ht : μ t = 0) : μ (s ∪ t) = 0 := by simp [*]
lemma measure_null_iff_singleton (hs : s.Countable) : μ s = 0 ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, μ {x} = 0 := by
rw [← measure_biUnion_null_iff hs, biUnion_of_singleton]
| /-- Let `μ` be an (outer) measure; let `s : ι → Set α` be a sequence of sets, `S = ⋃ n, s n`.
If `μ (S \ s n)` tends to zero along some nontrivial filter (usually `Filter.atTop` on `ι = ℕ`),
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/Basic.lean | 125 | 126 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Kexing Ying, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sym
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.BilinearMap
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FiniteDimensional.Lemmas
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Determinant.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.SesquilinearForm
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Symmetric
/-!
# Quadratic maps
This file defines quadratic maps on an `R`-module `M`, taking values in an `R`-module `N`.
An `N`-valued quadratic map on a module `M` over a commutative ring `R` is a map `Q : M → N` such
that:
* `QuadraticMap.map_smul`: `Q (a • x) = (a * a) • Q x`
* `QuadraticMap.polar_add_left`, `QuadraticMap.polar_add_right`,
`QuadraticMap.polar_smul_left`, `QuadraticMap.polar_smul_right`:
the map `QuadraticMap.polar Q := fun x y ↦ Q (x + y) - Q x - Q y` is bilinear.
This notion generalizes to commutative semirings using the approach in [izhakian2016][] which
requires that there be a (possibly non-unique) companion bilinear map `B` such that
`∀ x y, Q (x + y) = Q x + Q y + B x y`. Over a ring, this `B` is precisely `QuadraticMap.polar Q`.
To build a `QuadraticMap` from the `polar` axioms, use `QuadraticMap.ofPolar`.
Quadratic maps come with a scalar multiplication, `(a • Q) x = a • Q x`,
and composition with linear maps `f`, `Q.comp f x = Q (f x)`.
## Main definitions
* `QuadraticMap.ofPolar`: a more familiar constructor that works on rings
* `QuadraticMap.associated`: associated bilinear map
* `QuadraticMap.PosDef`: positive definite quadratic maps
* `QuadraticMap.Anisotropic`: anisotropic quadratic maps
* `QuadraticMap.discr`: discriminant of a quadratic map
* `QuadraticMap.IsOrtho`: orthogonality of vectors with respect to a quadratic map.
## Main statements
* `QuadraticMap.associated_left_inverse`,
* `QuadraticMap.associated_rightInverse`: in a commutative ring where 2 has
an inverse, there is a correspondence between quadratic maps and symmetric
bilinear forms
* `LinearMap.BilinForm.exists_orthogonal_basis`: There exists an orthogonal basis with
respect to any nondegenerate, symmetric bilinear map `B`.
## Notation
In this file, the variable `R` is used when a `CommSemiring` structure is available.
The variable `S` is used when `R` itself has a `•` action.
## Implementation notes
While the definition and many results make sense if we drop commutativity assumptions,
the correct definition of a quadratic maps in the noncommutative setting would require
substantial refactors from the current version, such that $Q(rm) = rQ(m)r^*$ for some
suitable conjugation $r^*$.
The [Zulip thread](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/116395-maths/topic/Quadratic.20Maps/near/395529867)
has some further discussion.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadratic_form
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discriminant#Quadratic_forms
## Tags
quadratic map, homogeneous polynomial, quadratic polynomial
-/
universe u v w
variable {S T : Type*}
variable {R : Type*} {M N P A : Type*}
open LinearMap (BilinMap BilinForm)
section Polar
variable [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup N]
namespace QuadraticMap
/-- Up to a factor 2, `Q.polar` is the associated bilinear map for a quadratic map `Q`.
Source of this name: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadratic_form#Generalization
-/
def polar (f : M → N) (x y : M) :=
f (x + y) - f x - f y
protected theorem map_add (f : M → N) (x y : M) :
f (x + y) = f x + f y + polar f x y := by
rw [polar]
abel
theorem polar_add (f g : M → N) (x y : M) : polar (f + g) x y = polar f x y + polar g x y := by
simp only [polar, Pi.add_apply]
abel
theorem polar_neg (f : M → N) (x y : M) : polar (-f) x y = -polar f x y := by
simp only [polar, Pi.neg_apply, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_add]
theorem polar_smul [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S N] (f : M → N) (s : S) (x y : M) :
polar (s • f) x y = s • polar f x y := by simp only [polar, Pi.smul_apply, smul_sub]
theorem polar_comm (f : M → N) (x y : M) : polar f x y = polar f y x := by
rw [polar, polar, add_comm, sub_sub, sub_sub, add_comm (f x) (f y)]
/-- Auxiliary lemma to express bilinearity of `QuadraticMap.polar` without subtraction. -/
theorem polar_add_left_iff {f : M → N} {x x' y : M} :
polar f (x + x') y = polar f x y + polar f x' y ↔
f (x + x' + y) + (f x + f x' + f y) = f (x + x') + f (x' + y) + f (y + x) := by
simp only [← add_assoc]
simp only [polar, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, eq_sub_iff_add_eq, sub_add_eq_add_sub, add_sub]
simp only [add_right_comm _ (f y) _, add_right_comm _ (f x') (f x)]
rw [add_comm y x, add_right_comm _ _ (f (x + y)), add_comm _ (f (x + y)),
add_right_comm (f (x + y)), add_left_inj]
theorem polar_comp {F : Type*} [AddCommGroup S] [FunLike F N S] [AddMonoidHomClass F N S]
(f : M → N) (g : F) (x y : M) :
polar (g ∘ f) x y = g (polar f x y) := by
simp only [polar, Pi.smul_apply, Function.comp_apply, map_sub]
/-- `QuadraticMap.polar` as a function from `Sym2`. -/
def polarSym2 (f : M → N) : Sym2 M → N :=
Sym2.lift ⟨polar f, polar_comm _⟩
@[simp]
lemma polarSym2_sym2Mk (f : M → N) (xy : M × M) : polarSym2 f (.mk xy) = polar f xy.1 xy.2 := rfl
end QuadraticMap
end Polar
/-- A quadratic map on a module.
For a more familiar constructor when `R` is a ring, see `QuadraticMap.ofPolar`. -/
structure QuadraticMap (R : Type u) (M : Type v) (N : Type w) [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M]
[Module R M] [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N] where
toFun : M → N
toFun_smul : ∀ (a : R) (x : M), toFun (a • x) = (a * a) • toFun x
exists_companion' : ∃ B : BilinMap R M N, ∀ x y, toFun (x + y) = toFun x + toFun y + B x y
section QuadraticForm
variable (R : Type u) (M : Type v) [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
/-- A quadratic form on a module. -/
abbrev QuadraticForm : Type _ := QuadraticMap R M R
end QuadraticForm
namespace QuadraticMap
section DFunLike
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
variable {Q Q' : QuadraticMap R M N}
instance instFunLike : FunLike (QuadraticMap R M N) M N where
coe := toFun
coe_injective' x y h := by cases x; cases y; congr
variable (Q)
/-- The `simp` normal form for a quadratic map is `DFunLike.coe`, not `toFun`. -/
@[simp]
theorem toFun_eq_coe : Q.toFun = ⇑Q :=
rfl
-- this must come after the coe_to_fun definition
initialize_simps_projections QuadraticMap (toFun → apply)
variable {Q}
@[ext]
theorem ext (H : ∀ x : M, Q x = Q' x) : Q = Q' :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ H
theorem congr_fun (h : Q = Q') (x : M) : Q x = Q' x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun h _
/-- Copy of a `QuadraticMap` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
protected def copy (Q : QuadraticMap R M N) (Q' : M → N) (h : Q' = ⇑Q) : QuadraticMap R M N where
toFun := Q'
toFun_smul := h.symm ▸ Q.toFun_smul
exists_companion' := h.symm ▸ Q.exists_companion'
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (Q : QuadraticMap R M N) (Q' : M → N) (h : Q' = ⇑Q) : ⇑(Q.copy Q' h) = Q' :=
rfl
theorem copy_eq (Q : QuadraticMap R M N) (Q' : M → N) (h : Q' = ⇑Q) : Q.copy Q' h = Q :=
DFunLike.ext' h
end DFunLike
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
variable (Q : QuadraticMap R M N)
protected theorem map_smul (a : R) (x : M) : Q (a • x) = (a * a) • Q x :=
Q.toFun_smul a x
theorem exists_companion : ∃ B : BilinMap R M N, ∀ x y, Q (x + y) = Q x + Q y + B x y :=
Q.exists_companion'
theorem map_add_add_add_map (x y z : M) :
Q (x + y + z) + (Q x + Q y + Q z) = Q (x + y) + Q (y + z) + Q (z + x) := by
obtain ⟨B, h⟩ := Q.exists_companion
rw [add_comm z x]
simp only [h, LinearMap.map_add₂]
abel
theorem map_add_self (x : M) : Q (x + x) = 4 • Q x := by
rw [← two_smul R x, Q.map_smul, ← Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul R]
norm_num
-- not @[simp] because it is superseded by `ZeroHomClass.map_zero`
protected theorem map_zero : Q 0 = 0 := by
rw [← @zero_smul R _ _ _ _ (0 : M), Q.map_smul, zero_mul, zero_smul]
instance zeroHomClass : ZeroHomClass (QuadraticMap R M N) M N :=
{ QuadraticMap.instFunLike (R := R) (M := M) (N := N) with map_zero := QuadraticMap.map_zero }
theorem map_smul_of_tower [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S R] [SMul S M] [IsScalarTower S R M]
[Module S N] [IsScalarTower S R N] (a : S)
(x : M) : Q (a • x) = (a * a) • Q x := by
rw [← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_smul R a x, Q.map_smul, ← RingHom.map_mul, algebraMap_smul]
end CommSemiring
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup N]
variable [Module R M] [Module R N] (Q : QuadraticMap R M N)
@[simp]
protected theorem map_neg (x : M) : Q (-x) = Q x := by
rw [← @neg_one_smul R _ _ _ _ x, Q.map_smul, neg_one_mul, neg_neg, one_smul]
protected theorem map_sub (x y : M) : Q (x - y) = Q (y - x) := by rw [← neg_sub, Q.map_neg]
@[simp]
theorem polar_zero_left (y : M) : polar Q 0 y = 0 := by
simp only [polar, zero_add, QuadraticMap.map_zero, sub_zero, sub_self]
@[simp]
theorem polar_add_left (x x' y : M) : polar Q (x + x') y = polar Q x y + polar Q x' y :=
polar_add_left_iff.mpr <| Q.map_add_add_add_map x x' y
@[simp]
theorem polar_smul_left (a : R) (x y : M) : polar Q (a • x) y = a • polar Q x y := by
obtain ⟨B, h⟩ := Q.exists_companion
simp_rw [polar, h, Q.map_smul, LinearMap.map_smul₂, sub_sub, add_sub_cancel_left]
@[simp]
theorem polar_neg_left (x y : M) : polar Q (-x) y = -polar Q x y := by
rw [← neg_one_smul R x, polar_smul_left, neg_one_smul]
@[simp]
theorem polar_sub_left (x x' y : M) : polar Q (x - x') y = polar Q x y - polar Q x' y := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, polar_add_left, polar_neg_left]
@[simp]
theorem polar_zero_right (y : M) : polar Q y 0 = 0 := by
simp only [add_zero, polar, QuadraticMap.map_zero, sub_self]
@[simp]
theorem polar_add_right (x y y' : M) : polar Q x (y + y') = polar Q x y + polar Q x y' := by
rw [polar_comm Q x, polar_comm Q x, polar_comm Q x, polar_add_left]
@[simp]
theorem polar_smul_right (a : R) (x y : M) : polar Q x (a • y) = a • polar Q x y := by
rw [polar_comm Q x, polar_comm Q x, polar_smul_left]
@[simp]
theorem polar_neg_right (x y : M) : polar Q x (-y) = -polar Q x y := by
rw [← neg_one_smul R y, polar_smul_right, neg_one_smul]
@[simp]
theorem polar_sub_right (x y y' : M) : polar Q x (y - y') = polar Q x y - polar Q x y' := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, polar_add_right, polar_neg_right]
@[simp]
theorem polar_self (x : M) : polar Q x x = 2 • Q x := by
rw [polar, map_add_self, sub_sub, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, ← two_smul ℕ, ← two_smul ℕ, ← mul_smul]
norm_num
/-- `QuadraticMap.polar` as a bilinear map -/
@[simps!]
def polarBilin : BilinMap R M N :=
LinearMap.mk₂ R (polar Q) (polar_add_left Q) (polar_smul_left Q) (polar_add_right Q)
(polar_smul_right Q)
lemma polarSym2_map_smul {ι} (Q : QuadraticMap R M N) (g : ι → M) (l : ι → R) (p : Sym2 ι) :
polarSym2 Q (p.map (l • g)) = (p.map l).mul • polarSym2 Q (p.map g) := by
obtain ⟨_, _⟩ := p; simp [← smul_assoc, mul_comm]
variable [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S R] [Module S M] [IsScalarTower S R M] [Module S N]
[IsScalarTower S R N]
@[simp]
theorem polar_smul_left_of_tower (a : S) (x y : M) : polar Q (a • x) y = a • polar Q x y := by
rw [← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_smul R a x, polar_smul_left, algebraMap_smul]
@[simp]
theorem polar_smul_right_of_tower (a : S) (x y : M) : polar Q x (a • y) = a • polar Q x y := by
rw [← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_smul R a y, polar_smul_right, algebraMap_smul]
/-- An alternative constructor to `QuadraticMap.mk`, for rings where `polar` can be used. -/
@[simps]
def ofPolar (toFun : M → N) (toFun_smul : ∀ (a : R) (x : M), toFun (a • x) = (a * a) • toFun x)
(polar_add_left : ∀ x x' y : M, polar toFun (x + x') y = polar toFun x y + polar toFun x' y)
(polar_smul_left : ∀ (a : R) (x y : M), polar toFun (a • x) y = a • polar toFun x y) :
QuadraticMap R M N :=
{ toFun
toFun_smul
exists_companion' := ⟨LinearMap.mk₂ R (polar toFun) (polar_add_left) (polar_smul_left)
(fun x _ _ ↦ by simp_rw [polar_comm _ x, polar_add_left])
(fun _ _ _ ↦ by rw [polar_comm, polar_smul_left, polar_comm]),
fun _ _ ↦ by
simp only [LinearMap.mk₂_apply]
rw [polar, sub_sub, add_sub_cancel]⟩ }
/-- In a ring the companion bilinear form is unique and equal to `QuadraticMap.polar`. -/
theorem choose_exists_companion : Q.exists_companion.choose = polarBilin Q :=
LinearMap.ext₂ fun x y => by
rw [polarBilin_apply_apply, polar, Q.exists_companion.choose_spec, sub_sub,
add_sub_cancel_left]
protected theorem map_sum {ι} [DecidableEq ι] (Q : QuadraticMap R M N) (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → M) :
Q (∑ i ∈ s, f i) = ∑ i ∈ s, Q (f i)
+ ∑ ij ∈ s.sym2 with ¬ ij.IsDiag, polarSym2 Q (ij.map f) := by
induction s using Finset.cons_induction with
| empty => simp
| cons a s ha ih =>
simp_rw [Finset.sum_cons, QuadraticMap.map_add, ih, add_assoc, Finset.sym2_cons,
Finset.sum_filter, Finset.sum_disjUnion, Finset.sum_map, Finset.sum_cons,
Sym2.mkEmbedding_apply, Sym2.isDiag_iff_proj_eq, not_true, if_false, zero_add,
Sym2.map_pair_eq, polarSym2_sym2Mk, ← polarBilin_apply_apply, _root_.map_sum,
polarBilin_apply_apply]
congr 2
rw [add_comm]
congr! with i hi
rw [if_pos (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hi ha).symm]
protected theorem map_sum' {ι} (Q : QuadraticMap R M N) (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → M) :
Q (∑ i ∈ s, f i) = ∑ ij ∈ s.sym2, polarSym2 Q (ij.map f) - ∑ i ∈ s, Q (f i) := by
induction s using Finset.cons_induction with
| empty => simp
| cons a s ha ih =>
simp_rw [Finset.sum_cons, QuadraticMap.map_add Q, ih, add_assoc, Finset.sym2_cons,
Finset.sum_disjUnion, Finset.sum_map, Finset.sum_cons, Sym2.mkEmbedding_apply,
Sym2.map_pair_eq, polarSym2_sym2Mk, ← polarBilin_apply_apply, _root_.map_sum,
polarBilin_apply_apply, polar_self]
abel_nf
end CommRing
section SemiringOperators
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
section SMul
variable [Monoid S] [Monoid T] [DistribMulAction S N] [DistribMulAction T N]
variable [SMulCommClass S R N] [SMulCommClass T R N]
/-- `QuadraticMap R M N` inherits the scalar action from any algebra over `R`.
This provides an `R`-action via `Algebra.id`. -/
instance : SMul S (QuadraticMap R M N) :=
⟨fun a Q =>
{ toFun := a • ⇑Q
toFun_smul := fun b x => by
rw [Pi.smul_apply, Q.map_smul, Pi.smul_apply, smul_comm]
exists_companion' :=
let ⟨B, h⟩ := Q.exists_companion
letI := SMulCommClass.symm S R N
⟨a • B, by simp [h]⟩ }⟩
@[simp]
theorem coeFn_smul (a : S) (Q : QuadraticMap R M N) : ⇑(a • Q) = a • ⇑Q :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply (a : S) (Q : QuadraticMap R M N) (x : M) : (a • Q) x = a • Q x :=
rfl
instance [SMulCommClass S T N] : SMulCommClass S T (QuadraticMap R M N) where
smul_comm _s _t _q := ext fun _ => smul_comm _ _ _
instance [SMul S T] [IsScalarTower S T N] : IsScalarTower S T (QuadraticMap R M N) where
smul_assoc _s _t _q := ext fun _ => smul_assoc _ _ _
end SMul
instance : Zero (QuadraticMap R M N) :=
⟨{ toFun := fun _ => 0
toFun_smul := fun a _ => by simp only [smul_zero]
exists_companion' := ⟨0, fun _ _ => by simp only [add_zero, LinearMap.zero_apply]⟩ }⟩
@[simp]
theorem coeFn_zero : ⇑(0 : QuadraticMap R M N) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply (x : M) : (0 : QuadraticMap R M N) x = 0 :=
rfl
instance : Inhabited (QuadraticMap R M N) :=
⟨0⟩
instance : Add (QuadraticMap R M N) :=
⟨fun Q Q' =>
{ toFun := Q + Q'
toFun_smul := fun a x => by simp only [Pi.add_apply, smul_add, QuadraticMap.map_smul]
exists_companion' :=
let ⟨B, h⟩ := Q.exists_companion
let ⟨B', h'⟩ := Q'.exists_companion
⟨B + B', fun x y => by
simp_rw [Pi.add_apply, h, h', LinearMap.add_apply, add_add_add_comm]⟩ }⟩
@[simp]
theorem coeFn_add (Q Q' : QuadraticMap R M N) : ⇑(Q + Q') = Q + Q' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_apply (Q Q' : QuadraticMap R M N) (x : M) : (Q + Q') x = Q x + Q' x :=
rfl
instance : AddCommMonoid (QuadraticMap R M N) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addCommMonoid _ coeFn_zero coeFn_add fun _ _ => coeFn_smul _ _
/-- `@CoeFn (QuadraticMap R M)` as an `AddMonoidHom`.
This API mirrors `AddMonoidHom.coeFn`. -/
@[simps apply]
def coeFnAddMonoidHom : QuadraticMap R M N →+ M → N where
toFun := DFunLike.coe
map_zero' := coeFn_zero
map_add' := coeFn_add
/-- Evaluation on a particular element of the module `M` is an additive map on quadratic maps. -/
@[simps! apply]
def evalAddMonoidHom (m : M) : QuadraticMap R M N →+ N :=
(Pi.evalAddMonoidHom _ m).comp coeFnAddMonoidHom
section Sum
@[simp]
theorem coeFn_sum {ι : Type*} (Q : ι → QuadraticMap R M N) (s : Finset ι) :
⇑(∑ i ∈ s, Q i) = ∑ i ∈ s, ⇑(Q i) :=
map_sum coeFnAddMonoidHom Q s
@[simp]
theorem sum_apply {ι : Type*} (Q : ι → QuadraticMap R M N) (s : Finset ι) (x : M) :
(∑ i ∈ s, Q i) x = ∑ i ∈ s, Q i x :=
map_sum (evalAddMonoidHom x : _ →+ N) Q s
end Sum
instance [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S N] [SMulCommClass S R N] :
DistribMulAction S (QuadraticMap R M N) where
mul_smul a b Q := ext fun x => by simp only [smul_apply, mul_smul]
one_smul Q := ext fun x => by simp only [QuadraticMap.smul_apply, one_smul]
smul_add a Q Q' := by
ext
simp only [add_apply, smul_apply, smul_add]
smul_zero a := by
ext
simp only [zero_apply, smul_apply, smul_zero]
instance [Semiring S] [Module S N] [SMulCommClass S R N] :
Module S (QuadraticMap R M N) where
zero_smul Q := by
ext
simp only [zero_apply, smul_apply, zero_smul]
add_smul a b Q := by
ext
simp only [add_apply, smul_apply, add_smul]
end SemiringOperators
section RingOperators
variable [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [AddCommGroup N] [Module R N]
instance : Neg (QuadraticMap R M N) :=
⟨fun Q =>
{ toFun := -Q
toFun_smul := fun a x => by simp only [Pi.neg_apply, Q.map_smul, smul_neg]
exists_companion' :=
let ⟨B, h⟩ := Q.exists_companion
⟨-B, fun x y => by simp_rw [Pi.neg_apply, h, LinearMap.neg_apply, neg_add]⟩ }⟩
@[simp]
theorem coeFn_neg (Q : QuadraticMap R M N) : ⇑(-Q) = -Q :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem neg_apply (Q : QuadraticMap R M N) (x : M) : (-Q) x = -Q x :=
rfl
instance : Sub (QuadraticMap R M N) :=
⟨fun Q Q' => (Q + -Q').copy (Q - Q') (sub_eq_add_neg _ _)⟩
@[simp]
theorem coeFn_sub (Q Q' : QuadraticMap R M N) : ⇑(Q - Q') = Q - Q' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sub_apply (Q Q' : QuadraticMap R M N) (x : M) : (Q - Q') x = Q x - Q' x :=
rfl
instance : AddCommGroup (QuadraticMap R M N) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addCommGroup _ coeFn_zero coeFn_add coeFn_neg coeFn_sub
(fun _ _ => coeFn_smul _ _) fun _ _ => coeFn_smul _ _
end RingOperators
section restrictScalars
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [AddCommMonoid N]
[Module R N] [Module S M] [Module S N] [Algebra S R]
variable [IsScalarTower S R M] [IsScalarTower S R N]
/-- If `Q : M → N` is a quadratic map of `R`-modules and `R` is an `S`-algebra,
then the restriction of scalars is a quadratic map of `S`-modules. -/
@[simps!]
def restrictScalars (Q : QuadraticMap R M N) : QuadraticMap S M N where
toFun x := Q x
toFun_smul a x := by
simp [map_smul_of_tower]
exists_companion' :=
let ⟨B, h⟩ := Q.exists_companion
⟨B.restrictScalars₁₂ (S := R) (R' := S) (S' := S), fun x y => by
simp only [LinearMap.restrictScalars₁₂_apply_apply, h]⟩
end restrictScalars
section Comp
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
variable [AddCommMonoid P] [Module R P]
/-- Compose the quadratic map with a linear function on the right. -/
def comp (Q : QuadraticMap R N P) (f : M →ₗ[R] N) : QuadraticMap R M P where
toFun x := Q (f x)
toFun_smul a x := by simp only [Q.map_smul, map_smul]
exists_companion' :=
let ⟨B, h⟩ := Q.exists_companion
⟨B.compl₁₂ f f, fun x y => by simp_rw [f.map_add]; exact h (f x) (f y)⟩
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply (Q : QuadraticMap R N P) (f : M →ₗ[R] N) (x : M) : (Q.comp f) x = Q (f x) :=
rfl
/-- Compose a quadratic map with a linear function on the left. -/
@[simps +simpRhs]
def _root_.LinearMap.compQuadraticMap (f : N →ₗ[R] P) (Q : QuadraticMap R M N) :
QuadraticMap R M P where
toFun x := f (Q x)
toFun_smul b x := by simp only [Q.map_smul, map_smul]
exists_companion' :=
let ⟨B, h⟩ := Q.exists_companion
⟨B.compr₂ f, fun x y => by simp only [h, map_add, LinearMap.compr₂_apply]⟩
/-- Compose a quadratic map with a linear function on the left. -/
@[simps! +simpRhs]
def _root_.LinearMap.compQuadraticMap' [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S R] [Module S N] [Module S M]
[IsScalarTower S R N] [IsScalarTower S R M] [Module S P]
(f : N →ₗ[S] P) (Q : QuadraticMap R M N) : QuadraticMap S M P :=
_root_.LinearMap.compQuadraticMap f Q.restrictScalars
/-- When `N` and `P` are equivalent, quadratic maps on `M` into `N` are equivalent to quadratic
maps on `M` into `P`.
See `LinearMap.BilinMap.congr₂` for the bilinear map version. -/
@[simps]
def _root_.LinearEquiv.congrQuadraticMap (e : N ≃ₗ[R] P) :
QuadraticMap R M N ≃ₗ[R] QuadraticMap R M P where
toFun Q := e.compQuadraticMap Q
invFun Q := e.symm.compQuadraticMap Q
left_inv _ := ext fun _ => e.symm_apply_apply _
right_inv _ := ext fun _ => e.apply_symm_apply _
map_add' _ _ := ext fun _ => map_add e _ _
map_smul' _ _ := ext fun _ => e.map_smul _ _
@[simp]
theorem _root_.LinearEquiv.congrQuadraticMap_refl :
LinearEquiv.congrQuadraticMap (.refl R N) = .refl R (QuadraticMap R M N) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem _root_.LinearEquiv.congrQuadraticMap_symm (e : N ≃ₗ[R] P) :
(LinearEquiv.congrQuadraticMap e (M := M)).symm = e.symm.congrQuadraticMap := rfl
end Comp
section NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable [Module R A] [SMulCommClass R A A] [IsScalarTower R A A]
/-- The product of linear maps into an `R`-algebra is a quadratic map. -/
def linMulLin (f g : M →ₗ[R] A) : QuadraticMap R M A where
toFun := f * g
toFun_smul a x := by
rw [Pi.mul_apply, Pi.mul_apply, LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ, RingHom.id_apply, LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ,
RingHom.id_apply, smul_mul_assoc, mul_smul_comm, ← smul_assoc, smul_eq_mul]
exists_companion' :=
⟨(LinearMap.mul R A).compl₁₂ f g + (LinearMap.mul R A).flip.compl₁₂ g f, fun x y => by
simp only [Pi.mul_apply, map_add, left_distrib, right_distrib, LinearMap.add_apply,
LinearMap.compl₁₂_apply, LinearMap.mul_apply', LinearMap.flip_apply]
abel_nf⟩
@[simp]
theorem linMulLin_apply (f g : M →ₗ[R] A) (x) : linMulLin f g x = f x * g x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_linMulLin (f g h : M →ₗ[R] A) : linMulLin (f + g) h = linMulLin f h + linMulLin g h :=
ext fun _ => add_mul _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem linMulLin_add (f g h : M →ₗ[R] A) : linMulLin f (g + h) = linMulLin f g + linMulLin f h :=
ext fun _ => mul_add _ _ _
variable {N' : Type*} [AddCommMonoid N'] [Module R N']
@[simp]
theorem linMulLin_comp (f g : M →ₗ[R] A) (h : N' →ₗ[R] M) :
(linMulLin f g).comp h = linMulLin (f.comp h) (g.comp h) :=
rfl
variable {n : Type*}
/-- `sq` is the quadratic map sending the vector `x : A` to `x * x` -/
@[simps!]
def sq : QuadraticMap R A A :=
linMulLin LinearMap.id LinearMap.id
/-- `proj i j` is the quadratic map sending the vector `x : n → R` to `x i * x j` -/
def proj (i j : n) : QuadraticMap R (n → A) A :=
linMulLin (@LinearMap.proj _ _ _ (fun _ => A) _ _ i) (@LinearMap.proj _ _ _ (fun _ => A) _ _ j)
@[simp]
theorem proj_apply (i j : n) (x : n → A) : proj (R := R) i j x = x i * x j :=
rfl
end NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
end QuadraticMap
/-!
### Associated bilinear maps
If multiplication by 2 is invertible on the target module `N` of
`QuadraticMap R M N`, then there is a linear bijection `QuadraticMap.associated`
between quadratic maps `Q` over `R` from `M` to `N` and symmetric bilinear maps
`B : M →ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] → N` such that `BilinMap.toQuadraticMap B = Q`
(see `QuadraticMap.associated_rightInverse`). The associated bilinear map is half
`Q.polarBilin` (see `QuadraticMap.two_nsmul_associated`); this is where the invertibility condition
comes from. We spell the condition as `[Invertible (2 : Module.End R N)]`.
Note that this makes the bijection available in more cases than the simpler condition
`Invertible (2 : R)`, e.g., when `R = ℤ` and `N = ℝ`.
-/
namespace LinearMap
namespace BilinMap
open QuadraticMap
open LinearMap (BilinMap)
section Semiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
variable {N' : Type*} [AddCommMonoid N'] [Module R N']
/-- A bilinear map gives a quadratic map by applying the argument twice. -/
def toQuadraticMap (B : BilinMap R M N) : QuadraticMap R M N where
toFun x := B x x
toFun_smul a x := by simp only [map_smul, LinearMap.smul_apply, smul_smul]
exists_companion' := ⟨B + LinearMap.flip B, fun x y => by simp [add_add_add_comm, add_comm]⟩
@[simp]
theorem toQuadraticMap_apply (B : BilinMap R M N) (x : M) : B.toQuadraticMap x = B x x :=
rfl
theorem toQuadraticMap_comp_same (B : BilinMap R M N) (f : N' →ₗ[R] M) :
BilinMap.toQuadraticMap (B.compl₁₂ f f) = B.toQuadraticMap.comp f := rfl
section
variable (R M)
@[simp]
theorem toQuadraticMap_zero : (0 : BilinMap R M N).toQuadraticMap = 0 :=
rfl
end
@[simp]
theorem toQuadraticMap_add (B₁ B₂ : BilinMap R M N) :
(B₁ + B₂).toQuadraticMap = B₁.toQuadraticMap + B₂.toQuadraticMap :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toQuadraticMap_smul [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S N] [SMulCommClass S R N]
[SMulCommClass R S N] (a : S)
(B : BilinMap R M N) : (a • B).toQuadraticMap = a • B.toQuadraticMap :=
rfl
section
variable (S R M)
/-- `LinearMap.BilinMap.toQuadraticMap` as an additive homomorphism -/
@[simps]
def toQuadraticMapAddMonoidHom : (BilinMap R M N) →+ QuadraticMap R M N where
toFun := toQuadraticMap
map_zero' := toQuadraticMap_zero _ _
map_add' := toQuadraticMap_add
/-- `LinearMap.BilinMap.toQuadraticMap` as a linear map -/
@[simps!]
def toQuadraticMapLinearMap [Semiring S] [Module S N] [SMulCommClass S R N] [SMulCommClass R S N] :
(BilinMap R M N) →ₗ[S] QuadraticMap R M N where
toFun := toQuadraticMap
map_smul' := toQuadraticMap_smul
map_add' := toQuadraticMap_add
end
@[simp]
theorem toQuadraticMap_list_sum (B : List (BilinMap R M N)) :
B.sum.toQuadraticMap = (B.map toQuadraticMap).sum :=
map_list_sum (toQuadraticMapAddMonoidHom R M) B
@[simp]
theorem toQuadraticMap_multiset_sum (B : Multiset (BilinMap R M N)) :
B.sum.toQuadraticMap = (B.map toQuadraticMap).sum :=
map_multiset_sum (toQuadraticMapAddMonoidHom R M) B
@[simp]
theorem toQuadraticMap_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (B : ι → (BilinMap R M N)) :
(∑ i ∈ s, B i).toQuadraticMap = ∑ i ∈ s, (B i).toQuadraticMap :=
map_sum (toQuadraticMapAddMonoidHom R M) B s
@[simp]
theorem toQuadraticMap_eq_zero {B : BilinMap R M N} :
B.toQuadraticMap = 0 ↔ B.IsAlt :=
QuadraticMap.ext_iff
end Semiring
section Ring
variable [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup N] [Module R M] [Module R N]
variable {B : BilinMap R M N}
@[simp]
theorem toQuadraticMap_neg (B : BilinMap R M N) : (-B).toQuadraticMap = -B.toQuadraticMap :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toQuadraticMap_sub (B₁ B₂ : BilinMap R M N) :
(B₁ - B₂).toQuadraticMap = B₁.toQuadraticMap - B₂.toQuadraticMap :=
rfl
theorem polar_toQuadraticMap (x y : M) : polar (toQuadraticMap B) x y = B x y + B y x := by
simp only [polar, toQuadraticMap_apply, map_add, add_apply, add_assoc, add_comm (B y x) _,
add_sub_cancel_left, sub_eq_add_neg _ (B y y), add_neg_cancel_left]
theorem polarBilin_toQuadraticMap : polarBilin (toQuadraticMap B) = B + flip B :=
LinearMap.ext₂ polar_toQuadraticMap
@[simp] theorem _root_.QuadraticMap.toQuadraticMap_polarBilin (Q : QuadraticMap R M N) :
toQuadraticMap (polarBilin Q) = 2 • Q :=
QuadraticMap.ext fun x => (polar_self _ x).trans <| by simp
theorem _root_.QuadraticMap.polarBilin_injective (h : IsUnit (2 : R)) :
Function.Injective (polarBilin : QuadraticMap R M N → _) := by
intro Q₁ Q₂ h₁₂
apply h.smul_left_cancel.mp
rw [show (2 : R) = (2 : ℕ) by rfl]
simp_rw [Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul R, ← QuadraticMap.toQuadraticMap_polarBilin]
exact congrArg toQuadraticMap h₁₂
section
variable {N' : Type*} [AddCommGroup N'] [Module R N']
theorem _root_.QuadraticMap.polarBilin_comp (Q : QuadraticMap R N' N) (f : M →ₗ[R] N') :
polarBilin (Q.comp f) = LinearMap.compl₁₂ (polarBilin Q) f f :=
LinearMap.ext₂ <| fun x y => by simp [polar]
end
variable {N' : Type*} [AddCommGroup N']
theorem _root_.LinearMap.compQuadraticMap_polar [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S R] [Module S N]
[Module S N'] [IsScalarTower S R N] [Module S M] [IsScalarTower S R M] (f : N →ₗ[S] N')
(Q : QuadraticMap R M N) (x y : M) : polar (f.compQuadraticMap' Q) x y = f (polar Q x y) := by
simp [polar]
variable [Module R N']
theorem _root_.LinearMap.compQuadraticMap_polarBilin (f : N →ₗ[R] N') (Q : QuadraticMap R M N) :
(f.compQuadraticMap' Q).polarBilin = Q.polarBilin.compr₂ f := by
ext
rw [polarBilin_apply_apply, compr₂_apply, polarBilin_apply_apply,
LinearMap.compQuadraticMap_polar]
end Ring
end BilinMap
end LinearMap
namespace QuadraticMap
open LinearMap (BilinMap)
section
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
instance : SMulCommClass R (Submonoid.center R) M where
smul_comm r r' m := by
simp_rw [Submonoid.smul_def, smul_smul, (Set.mem_center_iff.1 r'.prop).1]
/-- If `2` is invertible in `R`, then it is also invertible in `End R M`. -/
instance [Invertible (2 : R)] : Invertible (2 : Module.End R M) where
invOf := (⟨⅟2, Set.invOf_mem_center (Set.ofNat_mem_center _ _)⟩ : Submonoid.center R) •
(1 : Module.End R M)
invOf_mul_self := by
ext m
dsimp [Submonoid.smul_def]
rw [← ofNat_smul_eq_nsmul R, invOf_smul_smul (2 : R) m]
mul_invOf_self := by
ext m
dsimp [Submonoid.smul_def]
rw [← ofNat_smul_eq_nsmul R, smul_invOf_smul (2 : R) m]
/-- If `2` is invertible in `R`, then applying the inverse of `2` in `End R M` to an element
of `M` is the same as multiplying by the inverse of `2` in `R`. -/
@[simp]
lemma half_moduleEnd_apply_eq_half_smul [Invertible (2 : R)] (x : M) :
⅟ (2 : Module.End R M) x = ⅟ (2 : R) • x :=
rfl
end
section AssociatedHom
variable [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable [AddCommGroup N] [Module R N]
variable (S) [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S R] [Module S N] [IsScalarTower S R N]
-- the requirement that multiplication by `2` is invertible on the target module `N`
variable [Invertible (2 : Module.End R N)]
/-- `associatedHom` is the map that sends a quadratic map on a module `M` over `R` to its
associated symmetric bilinear map. As provided here, this has the structure of an `S`-linear map
where `S` is a commutative ring and `R` is an `S`-algebra.
Over a commutative ring, use `QuadraticMap.associated`, which gives an `R`-linear map. Over a
general ring with no nontrivial distinguished commutative subring, use `QuadraticMap.associated'`,
which gives an additive homomorphism (or more precisely a `ℤ`-linear map.) -/
def associatedHom : QuadraticMap R M N →ₗ[S] (BilinMap R M N) where
toFun Q := ⅟ (2 : Module.End R N) • polarBilin Q
map_add' _ _ := LinearMap.ext₂ fun _ _ ↦ by simp [polar_add]
map_smul' _ _ := LinearMap.ext₂ fun _ _ ↦ by simp [polar_smul]
variable (Q : QuadraticMap R M N)
@[simp]
theorem associated_apply (x y : M) :
associatedHom S Q x y = ⅟ (2 : Module.End R N) • (Q (x + y) - Q x - Q y) :=
rfl
/-- Twice the associated bilinear map of `Q` is the same as the polar of `Q`. -/
@[simp] theorem two_nsmul_associated : 2 • associatedHom S Q = Q.polarBilin := by
ext
dsimp
rw [← LinearMap.smul_apply, nsmul_eq_mul, Nat.cast_ofNat, mul_invOf_self', Module.End.one_apply,
polar]
theorem associated_isSymm (Q : QuadraticMap R M N) (x y : M) :
associatedHom S Q x y = associatedHom S Q y x := by
simp only [associated_apply, sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc, add_comm, add_left_comm]
theorem _root_.QuadraticForm.associated_isSymm (Q : QuadraticForm R M) [Invertible (2 : R)] :
(associatedHom S Q).IsSymm :=
QuadraticMap.associated_isSymm S Q
/-- A version of `QuadraticMap.associated_isSymm` for general targets
(using `flip` because `IsSymm` does not apply here). -/
lemma associated_flip : (associatedHom S Q).flip = associatedHom S Q := by
ext
simp only [LinearMap.flip_apply, associated_apply, add_comm, sub_eq_add_neg, add_left_comm,
add_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem associated_comp {N' : Type*} [AddCommGroup N'] [Module R N'] (f : N' →ₗ[R] M) :
associatedHom S (Q.comp f) = (associatedHom S Q).compl₁₂ f f := by
ext
simp only [associated_apply, comp_apply, map_add, LinearMap.compl₁₂_apply]
theorem associated_toQuadraticMap (B : BilinMap R M N) (x y : M) :
associatedHom S B.toQuadraticMap x y = ⅟ (2 : Module.End R N) • (B x y + B y x) := by
simp only [associated_apply, BilinMap.toQuadraticMap_apply, map_add, LinearMap.add_apply,
Module.End.smul_def, map_sub]
abel_nf
theorem associated_left_inverse {B₁ : BilinMap R M N} (h : ∀ x y, B₁ x y = B₁ y x) :
associatedHom S B₁.toQuadraticMap = B₁ :=
LinearMap.ext₂ fun x y ↦ by
rw [associated_toQuadraticMap, ← h x y, ← two_smul R, invOf_smul_eq_iff, two_smul, two_smul]
/-- A version of `QuadraticMap.associated_left_inverse` for general targets. -/
lemma associated_left_inverse' {B₁ : BilinMap R M N} (hB₁ : B₁.flip = B₁) :
associatedHom S B₁.toQuadraticMap = B₁ := by
ext _ y
rw [associated_toQuadraticMap, ← LinearMap.flip_apply _ y, hB₁, invOf_smul_eq_iff, two_smul]
theorem associated_eq_self_apply (x : M) : associatedHom S Q x x = Q x := by
rw [associated_apply, map_add_self, ← three_add_one_eq_four, ← two_add_one_eq_three, add_smul,
add_smul, one_smul, add_sub_cancel_right, add_sub_cancel_right, two_smul, ← two_smul R,
invOf_smul_eq_iff, two_smul, two_smul]
theorem toQuadraticMap_associated : (associatedHom S Q).toQuadraticMap = Q :=
QuadraticMap.ext <| associated_eq_self_apply S Q
-- note: usually `rightInverse` lemmas are named the other way around, but this is consistent
-- with historical naming in this file.
theorem associated_rightInverse :
Function.RightInverse (associatedHom S) (BilinMap.toQuadraticMap : _ → QuadraticMap R M N) :=
toQuadraticMap_associated S
/-- `associated'` is the `ℤ`-linear map that sends a quadratic form on a module `M` over `R` to its
associated symmetric bilinear form. -/
abbrev associated' : QuadraticMap R M N →ₗ[ℤ] BilinMap R M N :=
associatedHom ℤ
/-- Symmetric bilinear forms can be lifted to quadratic forms -/
instance canLift [Invertible (2 : R)] :
CanLift (BilinMap R M R) (QuadraticForm R M) (associatedHom ℕ) LinearMap.IsSymm where
prf B hB := ⟨B.toQuadraticMap, associated_left_inverse _ hB⟩
/-- Symmetric bilinear maps can be lifted to quadratic maps -/
instance canLift' :
CanLift (BilinMap R M N) (QuadraticMap R M N) (associatedHom ℕ) fun B ↦ B.flip = B where
prf B hB := ⟨B.toQuadraticMap, associated_left_inverse' _ hB⟩
/-- There exists a non-null vector with respect to any quadratic form `Q` whose associated
bilinear form is non-zero, i.e. there exists `x` such that `Q x ≠ 0`. -/
theorem exists_quadraticMap_ne_zero {Q : QuadraticMap R M N}
-- Porting note: added implicit argument
(hB₁ : associated' (N := N) Q ≠ 0) :
∃ x, Q x ≠ 0 := by
rw [← not_forall]
intro h
apply hB₁
rw [(QuadraticMap.ext h : Q = 0), LinearMap.map_zero]
end AssociatedHom
section Associated
variable [CommSemiring S] [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Algebra S R] [Module R M]
variable [AddCommGroup N] [Module R N] [Module S N] [IsScalarTower S R N]
variable [Invertible (2 : Module.End R N)]
-- Note: When possible, rather than writing lemmas about `associated`, write a lemma applying to
-- the more general `associatedHom` and place it in the previous section.
/-- `associated` is the linear map that sends a quadratic map over a commutative ring to its
associated symmetric bilinear map. -/
abbrev associated : QuadraticMap R M N →ₗ[R] BilinMap R M N :=
associatedHom R
variable (S) in
theorem coe_associatedHom :
⇑(associatedHom S : QuadraticMap R M N →ₗ[S] BilinMap R M N) = associated :=
rfl
open LinearMap in
@[simp]
theorem associated_linMulLin [Invertible (2 : R)] (f g : M →ₗ[R] R) :
associated (R := R) (N := R) (linMulLin f g) =
⅟ (2 : R) • ((mul R R).compl₁₂ f g + (mul R R).compl₁₂ g f) := by
ext
simp only [associated_apply, linMulLin_apply, map_add, smul_add, LinearMap.add_apply,
LinearMap.smul_apply, compl₁₂_apply, mul_apply', smul_eq_mul, invOf_smul_eq_iff]
simp only [smul_add, Module.End.smul_def, Module.End.ofNat_apply, nsmul_eq_mul, Nat.cast_ofNat,
mul_invOf_cancel_left']
ring_nf
open LinearMap in
| @[simp]
lemma associated_sq [Invertible (2 : R)] : associated (R := R) sq = mul R R :=
(associated_linMulLin (id) (id)).trans <|
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/QuadraticForm/Basic.lean | 1,014 | 1,016 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Jz Pan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jz Pan
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.Finite
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.Constructions
/-!
# Some results on free modules over rings satisfying strong rank condition
This file contains some results on free modules over rings satisfying strong rank condition.
Most of them are generalized from the same result assuming the base ring being division ring,
and are moved from the files `Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Dimension/DivisionRing.lean`
and `Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/FiniteDimensional.lean`.
-/
open Cardinal Module Module Set Submodule
universe u v
section Module
variable {K : Type u} {V : Type v} [Ring K] [StrongRankCondition K] [AddCommGroup V] [Module K V]
/-- The `ι` indexed basis on `V`, where `ι` is an empty type and `V` is zero-dimensional.
See also `Module.finBasis`.
-/
noncomputable def Basis.ofRankEqZero [Module.Free K V] {ι : Type*} [IsEmpty ι]
(hV : Module.rank K V = 0) : Basis ι K V :=
haveI : Subsingleton V := by
obtain ⟨_, b⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := K) (M := V)
haveI := mk_eq_zero_iff.1 (hV ▸ b.mk_eq_rank'')
exact b.repr.toEquiv.subsingleton
Basis.empty _
@[simp]
theorem Basis.ofRankEqZero_apply [Module.Free K V] {ι : Type*} [IsEmpty ι]
(hV : Module.rank K V = 0) (i : ι) : Basis.ofRankEqZero hV i = 0 := rfl
theorem le_rank_iff_exists_linearIndependent [Module.Free K V] {c : Cardinal} :
c ≤ Module.rank K V ↔ ∃ s : Set V, #s = c ∧ LinearIndepOn K id s := by
haveI := nontrivial_of_invariantBasisNumber K
constructor
· intro h
obtain ⟨κ, t'⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := K) (M := V)
let t := t'.reindexRange
have : LinearIndepOn K id (Set.range t') := by
convert t.linearIndependent.linearIndepOn_id
ext
simp [t]
rw [← t.mk_eq_rank'', le_mk_iff_exists_subset] at h
rcases h with ⟨s, hst, hsc⟩
exact ⟨s, hsc, this.mono hst⟩
· rintro ⟨s, rfl, si⟩
exact si.cardinal_le_rank
theorem le_rank_iff_exists_linearIndependent_finset
[Module.Free K V] {n : ℕ} : ↑n ≤ Module.rank K V ↔
∃ s : Finset V, s.card = n ∧ LinearIndependent K ((↑) : ↥(s : Set V) → V) := by
simp only [le_rank_iff_exists_linearIndependent, mk_set_eq_nat_iff_finset]
constructor
· rintro ⟨s, ⟨t, rfl, rfl⟩, si⟩
exact ⟨t, rfl, si⟩
· rintro ⟨s, rfl, si⟩
exact ⟨s, ⟨s, rfl, rfl⟩, si⟩
/-- A vector space has dimension at most `1` if and only if there is a
single vector of which all vectors are multiples. -/
theorem rank_le_one_iff [Module.Free K V] :
Module.rank K V ≤ 1 ↔ ∃ v₀ : V, ∀ v, ∃ r : K, r • v₀ = v := by
obtain ⟨κ, b⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := K) (M := V)
constructor
· intro hd
rw [← b.mk_eq_rank'', le_one_iff_subsingleton] at hd
rcases isEmpty_or_nonempty κ with hb | ⟨⟨i⟩⟩
· use 0
have h' : ∀ v : V, v = 0 := by
simpa [range_eq_empty, Submodule.eq_bot_iff] using b.span_eq.symm
intro v
simp [h' v]
· use b i
have h' : (K ∙ b i) = ⊤ :=
(subsingleton_range b).eq_singleton_of_mem (mem_range_self i) ▸ b.span_eq
intro v
have hv : v ∈ (⊤ : Submodule K V) := mem_top
rwa [← h', mem_span_singleton] at hv
· rintro ⟨v₀, hv₀⟩
have h : (K ∙ v₀) = ⊤ := by
ext
simp [mem_span_singleton, hv₀]
rw [← rank_top, ← h]
refine (rank_span_le _).trans_eq ?_
simp
/-- A vector space has dimension `1` if and only if there is a
single non-zero vector of which all vectors are multiples. -/
theorem rank_eq_one_iff [Module.Free K V] :
Module.rank K V = 1 ↔ ∃ v₀ : V, v₀ ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ v, ∃ r : K, r • v₀ = v := by
haveI := nontrivial_of_invariantBasisNumber K
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨v₀, h, hv⟩ ↦ (rank_le_one_iff.2 ⟨v₀, hv⟩).antisymm ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨v₀, hv⟩ := rank_le_one_iff.1 h.le
refine ⟨v₀, fun hzero ↦ ?_, hv⟩
simp_rw [hzero, smul_zero, exists_const] at hv
haveI : Subsingleton V := .intro fun _ _ ↦ by simp_rw [← hv]
exact one_ne_zero (h ▸ rank_subsingleton' K V)
· by_contra H
rw [not_le, lt_one_iff_zero] at H
obtain ⟨κ, b⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := K) (M := V)
haveI := mk_eq_zero_iff.1 (H ▸ b.mk_eq_rank'')
haveI := b.repr.toEquiv.subsingleton
exact h (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
/-- A submodule has dimension at most `1` if and only if there is a
single vector in the submodule such that the submodule is contained in
its span. -/
theorem rank_submodule_le_one_iff (s : Submodule K V) [Module.Free K s] :
Module.rank K s ≤ 1 ↔ ∃ v₀ ∈ s, s ≤ K ∙ v₀ := by
simp_rw [rank_le_one_iff, le_span_singleton_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨v₀, hv₀⟩, h⟩
use v₀, hv₀
intro v hv
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := h ⟨v, hv⟩
use r
rwa [Subtype.ext_iff, coe_smul] at hr
· rintro ⟨v₀, hv₀, h⟩
use ⟨v₀, hv₀⟩
rintro ⟨v, hv⟩
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := h v hv
use r
rwa [Subtype.ext_iff, coe_smul]
/-- A submodule has dimension `1` if and only if there is a
single non-zero vector in the submodule such that the submodule is contained in
its span. -/
theorem rank_submodule_eq_one_iff (s : Submodule K V) [Module.Free K s] :
Module.rank K s = 1 ↔ ∃ v₀ ∈ s, v₀ ≠ 0 ∧ s ≤ K ∙ v₀ := by
simp_rw [rank_eq_one_iff, le_span_singleton_iff]
refine ⟨fun ⟨⟨v₀, hv₀⟩, H, h⟩ ↦ ⟨v₀, hv₀, fun h' ↦ by
simp only [h', ne_eq] at H; exact H rfl, fun v hv ↦ ?_⟩,
fun ⟨v₀, hv₀, H, h⟩ ↦ ⟨⟨v₀, hv₀⟩,
fun h' ↦ H (by rwa [AddSubmonoid.mk_eq_zero] at h'), fun ⟨v, hv⟩ ↦ ?_⟩⟩
· obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := h ⟨v, hv⟩
exact ⟨r, by rwa [Subtype.ext_iff, coe_smul] at hr⟩
· obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := h v hv
exact ⟨r, by rwa [Subtype.ext_iff, coe_smul]⟩
/-- A submodule has dimension at most `1` if and only if there is a
single vector, not necessarily in the submodule, such that the
submodule is contained in its span. -/
theorem rank_submodule_le_one_iff' (s : Submodule K V) [Module.Free K s] :
Module.rank K s ≤ 1 ↔ ∃ v₀, s ≤ K ∙ v₀ := by
haveI := nontrivial_of_invariantBasisNumber K
constructor
· rw [rank_submodule_le_one_iff]
rintro ⟨v₀, _, h⟩
exact ⟨v₀, h⟩
· rintro ⟨v₀, h⟩
obtain ⟨κ, b⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := K) (M := s)
simpa [b.mk_eq_rank''] using b.linearIndependent.map' _ (ker_inclusion _ _ h)
|>.cardinal_le_rank.trans (rank_span_le {v₀})
theorem Submodule.rank_le_one_iff_isPrincipal (W : Submodule K V) [Module.Free K W] :
Module.rank K W ≤ 1 ↔ W.IsPrincipal := by
simp only [rank_le_one_iff, Submodule.isPrincipal_iff, le_antisymm_iff, le_span_singleton_iff,
span_singleton_le_iff_mem]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨m, hm⟩, hm'⟩
choose f hf using hm'
exact ⟨m, ⟨fun v hv => ⟨f ⟨v, hv⟩, congr_arg ((↑) : W → V) (hf ⟨v, hv⟩)⟩, hm⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨a, ⟨h, ha⟩⟩
choose f hf using h
exact ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, fun v => ⟨f v.1 v.2, Subtype.ext (hf v.1 v.2)⟩⟩
theorem Module.rank_le_one_iff_top_isPrincipal [Module.Free K V] :
Module.rank K V ≤ 1 ↔ (⊤ : Submodule K V).IsPrincipal := by
haveI := Module.Free.of_equiv (topEquiv (R := K) (M := V)).symm
rw [← Submodule.rank_le_one_iff_isPrincipal, rank_top]
/-- A module has dimension 1 iff there is some `v : V` so `{v}` is a basis.
-/
theorem finrank_eq_one_iff [Module.Free K V] (ι : Type*) [Unique ι] :
finrank K V = 1 ↔ Nonempty (Basis ι K V) := by
constructor
· intro h
exact ⟨Module.basisUnique ι h⟩
· rintro ⟨b⟩
simpa using finrank_eq_card_basis b
/-- A module has dimension 1 iff there is some nonzero `v : V` so every vector is a multiple of `v`.
-/
theorem finrank_eq_one_iff' [Module.Free K V] :
finrank K V = 1 ↔ ∃ v ≠ 0, ∀ w : V, ∃ c : K, c • v = w := by
rw [← rank_eq_one_iff]
exact toNat_eq_iff one_ne_zero
/-- A finite dimensional module has dimension at most 1 iff
there is some `v : V` so every vector is a multiple of `v`.
-/
theorem finrank_le_one_iff [Module.Free K V] [Module.Finite K V] :
finrank K V ≤ 1 ↔ ∃ v : V, ∀ w : V, ∃ c : K, c • v = w := by
rw [← rank_le_one_iff, ← finrank_eq_rank, Nat.cast_le_one]
theorem Submodule.finrank_le_one_iff_isPrincipal
(W : Submodule K V) [Module.Free K W] [Module.Finite K W] :
finrank K W ≤ 1 ↔ W.IsPrincipal := by
rw [← W.rank_le_one_iff_isPrincipal, ← finrank_eq_rank, Nat.cast_le_one]
theorem Module.finrank_le_one_iff_top_isPrincipal [Module.Free K V] [Module.Finite K V] :
finrank K V ≤ 1 ↔ (⊤ : Submodule K V).IsPrincipal := by
rw [← Module.rank_le_one_iff_top_isPrincipal, ← finrank_eq_rank, Nat.cast_le_one]
variable (K V) in
theorem lift_cardinalMk_eq_lift_cardinalMk_field_pow_lift_rank [Module.Free K V]
[Module.Finite K V] : lift.{u} #V = lift.{v} #K ^ lift.{u} (Module.rank K V) := by
haveI := nontrivial_of_invariantBasisNumber K
obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := K) (M := V)
-- `Module.Finite.finite_basis` is in a much later file, so we copy its proof to here
haveI : Finite s := by
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := ‹Module.Finite K V›
exact basis_finite_of_finite_spans t.finite_toSet ht hs
have := lift_mk_eq'.2 ⟨hs.repr.toEquiv⟩
rwa [Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite.cardinal_eq, mk_arrow, hs.mk_eq_rank'', lift_power, lift_lift,
lift_lift, lift_umax] at this
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-10")]
alias lift_cardinal_mk_eq_lift_cardinal_mk_field_pow_lift_rank :=
lift_cardinalMk_eq_lift_cardinalMk_field_pow_lift_rank
theorem cardinalMk_eq_cardinalMk_field_pow_rank (K V : Type u) [Ring K] [StrongRankCondition K]
[AddCommGroup V] [Module K V] [Module.Free K V] [Module.Finite K V] :
#V = #K ^ Module.rank K V := by
simpa using lift_cardinalMk_eq_lift_cardinalMk_field_pow_lift_rank K V
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-10")]
alias cardinal_mk_eq_cardinal_mk_field_pow_rank := cardinalMk_eq_cardinalMk_field_pow_rank
variable (K V) in
theorem cardinal_lt_aleph0_of_finiteDimensional [Finite K] [Module.Free K V] [Module.Finite K V] :
#V < ℵ₀ := by
rw [← lift_lt_aleph0.{v, u}, lift_cardinalMk_eq_lift_cardinalMk_field_pow_lift_rank K V]
exact power_lt_aleph0 (lift_lt_aleph0.2 (lt_aleph0_of_finite K))
(lift_lt_aleph0.2 (rank_lt_aleph0 K V))
|
end Module
namespace Subalgebra
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Dimension/FreeAndStrongRankCondition.lean | 248 | 252 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Regular.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Hom
/-!
# Action of regular elements on a module
We introduce `M`-regular elements, in the context of an `R`-module `M`. The corresponding
predicate is called `IsSMulRegular`.
There are very limited typeclass assumptions on `R` and `M`, but the "mathematical" case of interest
is a commutative ring `R` acting on a module `M`. Since the properties are "multiplicative", there
is no actual requirement of having an addition, but there is a zero in both `R` and `M`.
SMultiplications involving `0` are, of course, all trivial.
The defining property is that an element `a ∈ R` is `M`-regular if the smultiplication map
`M → M`, defined by `m ↦ a • m`, is injective.
This property is the direct generalization to modules of the property `IsLeftRegular` defined in
`Algebra/Regular`. Lemma `isLeftRegular_iff` shows that indeed the two notions
coincide.
-/
variable {R S : Type*} (M : Type*) {a b : R} {s : S}
/-- An `M`-regular element is an element `c` such that multiplication on the left by `c` is an
injective map `M → M`. -/
def IsSMulRegular [SMul R M] (c : R) :=
Function.Injective ((c • ·) : M → M)
theorem IsLeftRegular.isSMulRegular [Mul R] {c : R} (h : IsLeftRegular c) : IsSMulRegular R c :=
h
/-- Left-regular multiplication on `R` is equivalent to `R`-regularity of `R` itself. -/
theorem isLeftRegular_iff [Mul R] {a : R} : IsLeftRegular a ↔ IsSMulRegular R a :=
Iff.rfl
theorem IsRightRegular.isSMulRegular [Mul R] {c : R} (h : IsRightRegular c) :
IsSMulRegular R (MulOpposite.op c) :=
h
/-- Right-regular multiplication on `R` is equivalent to `Rᵐᵒᵖ`-regularity of `R` itself. -/
theorem isRightRegular_iff [Mul R] {a : R} :
IsRightRegular a ↔ IsSMulRegular R (MulOpposite.op a) :=
Iff.rfl
namespace IsSMulRegular
variable {M}
section SMul
variable [SMul R M] [SMul R S] [SMul S M] [IsScalarTower R S M]
/-- The product of `M`-regular elements is `M`-regular. -/
theorem smul (ra : IsSMulRegular M a) (rs : IsSMulRegular M s) : IsSMulRegular M (a • s) :=
fun _ _ ab => rs (ra ((smul_assoc _ _ _).symm.trans (ab.trans (smul_assoc _ _ _))))
/-- If an element `b` becomes `M`-regular after multiplying it on the left by an `M`-regular
element, then `b` is `M`-regular. -/
theorem of_smul (a : R) (ab : IsSMulRegular M (a • s)) : IsSMulRegular M s :=
@Function.Injective.of_comp _ _ _ (fun m : M => a • m) _ fun c d cd => by
dsimp only [Function.comp_def] at cd
rw [← smul_assoc, ← smul_assoc] at cd
exact ab cd
/-- An element is `M`-regular if and only if multiplying it on the left by an `M`-regular element
is `M`-regular. -/
@[simp]
theorem smul_iff (b : S) (ha : IsSMulRegular M a) : IsSMulRegular M (a • b) ↔ IsSMulRegular M b :=
⟨of_smul _, ha.smul⟩
theorem isLeftRegular [Mul R] {a : R} (h : IsSMulRegular R a) : IsLeftRegular a :=
h
theorem isRightRegular [Mul R] {a : R} (h : IsSMulRegular R (MulOpposite.op a)) :
IsRightRegular a :=
h
theorem mul [Mul R] [IsScalarTower R R M] (ra : IsSMulRegular M a) (rb : IsSMulRegular M b) :
IsSMulRegular M (a * b) :=
ra.smul rb
theorem of_mul [Mul R] [IsScalarTower R R M] (ab : IsSMulRegular M (a * b)) :
IsSMulRegular M b := by
rw [← smul_eq_mul] at ab
exact ab.of_smul _
@[simp]
theorem mul_iff_right [Mul R] [IsScalarTower R R M] (ha : IsSMulRegular M a) :
IsSMulRegular M (a * b) ↔ IsSMulRegular M b :=
⟨of_mul, ha.mul⟩
/-- Two elements `a` and `b` are `M`-regular if and only if both products `a * b` and `b * a`
are `M`-regular. -/
theorem mul_and_mul_iff [Mul R] [IsScalarTower R R M] :
IsSMulRegular M (a * b) ∧ IsSMulRegular M (b * a) ↔ IsSMulRegular M a ∧ IsSMulRegular M b := by
refine ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨ab, ba⟩
exact ⟨ba.of_mul, ab.of_mul⟩
· rintro ⟨ha, hb⟩
exact ⟨ha.mul hb, hb.mul ha⟩
lemma of_injective {N F} [SMul R N] [FunLike F M N] [MulActionHomClass F R M N]
(f : F) {r : R} (h1 : Function.Injective f) (h2 : IsSMulRegular N r) :
IsSMulRegular M r := fun x y h3 => h1 <| h2 <|
(map_smulₛₗ f r x).symm.trans ((congrArg f h3).trans (map_smulₛₗ f r y))
end SMul
section Monoid
variable [Monoid R] [MulAction R M]
variable (M)
/-- One is always `M`-regular. -/
@[simp]
theorem one : IsSMulRegular M (1 : R) := fun a b ab => by
dsimp only [Function.comp_def] at ab
rw [one_smul, one_smul] at ab
assumption
variable {M}
/-- An element of `R` admitting a left inverse is `M`-regular. -/
theorem of_mul_eq_one (h : a * b = 1) : IsSMulRegular M b :=
of_mul (a := a) (by rw [h]; exact one M)
/-- Any power of an `M`-regular element is `M`-regular. -/
theorem pow (n : ℕ) (ra : IsSMulRegular M a) : IsSMulRegular M (a ^ n) := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [pow_zero]; simp only [one]
| succ n hn =>
rw [pow_succ']
exact (ra.smul_iff (a ^ n)).mpr hn
/-- An element `a` is `M`-regular if and only if a positive power of `a` is `M`-regular. -/
theorem pow_iff {n : ℕ} (n0 : 0 < n) : IsSMulRegular M (a ^ n) ↔ IsSMulRegular M a := by
refine ⟨?_, pow n⟩
rw [← Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos n0, pow_succ, ← smul_eq_mul]
exact of_smul _
end Monoid
section MonoidSMul
variable [Monoid S] [SMul R M] [SMul R S] [MulAction S M] [IsScalarTower R S M]
/-- An element of `S` admitting a left inverse in `R` is `M`-regular. -/
theorem of_smul_eq_one (h : a • s = 1) : IsSMulRegular M s :=
of_smul a
(by
rw [h]
exact one M)
end MonoidSMul
section MonoidWithZero
variable [MonoidWithZero R] [Zero M] [MulActionWithZero R M]
/-- The element `0` is `M`-regular if and only if `M` is trivial. -/
protected theorem subsingleton (h : IsSMulRegular M (0 : R)) : Subsingleton M :=
⟨fun a b => h (by dsimp only [Function.comp_def]; repeat' rw [MulActionWithZero.zero_smul])⟩
/-- The element `0` is `M`-regular if and only if `M` is trivial. -/
theorem zero_iff_subsingleton : IsSMulRegular M (0 : R) ↔ Subsingleton M :=
⟨fun h => h.subsingleton, fun H a b _ => @Subsingleton.elim _ H a b⟩
/-- The `0` element is not `M`-regular, on a non-trivial module. -/
theorem not_zero_iff : ¬IsSMulRegular M (0 : R) ↔ Nontrivial M := by
rw [nontrivial_iff, not_iff_comm, zero_iff_subsingleton, subsingleton_iff]
push_neg
exact Iff.rfl
/-- The element `0` is `M`-regular when `M` is trivial. -/
theorem zero [sM : Subsingleton M] : IsSMulRegular M (0 : R) :=
zero_iff_subsingleton.mpr sM
/-- The `0` element is not `M`-regular, on a non-trivial module. -/
theorem not_zero [nM : Nontrivial M] : ¬IsSMulRegular M (0 : R) :=
not_zero_iff.mpr nM
end MonoidWithZero
section CommSemigroup
variable [CommSemigroup R] [SMul R M] [IsScalarTower R R M]
/-- A product is `M`-regular if and only if the factors are. -/
theorem mul_iff : IsSMulRegular M (a * b) ↔ IsSMulRegular M a ∧ IsSMulRegular M b := by
rw [← mul_and_mul_iff]
exact ⟨fun ab => ⟨ab, by rwa [mul_comm]⟩, fun rab => rab.1⟩
end CommSemigroup
end IsSMulRegular
section Group
variable {G : Type*} [Group G]
/-- An element of a group acting on a Type is regular. This relies on the availability
of the inverse given by groups, since there is no `LeftCancelSMul` typeclass. -/
theorem isSMulRegular_of_group [MulAction G R] (g : G) : IsSMulRegular R g := by
intro x y h
convert congr_arg (g⁻¹ • ·) h using 1 <;> simp [← smul_assoc]
end Group
section Units
variable [Monoid R] [MulAction R M]
/-- Any element in `Rˣ` is `M`-regular. -/
theorem Units.isSMulRegular (a : Rˣ) : IsSMulRegular M (a : R) :=
IsSMulRegular.of_mul_eq_one a.inv_val
/-- A unit is `M`-regular. -/
theorem IsUnit.isSMulRegular (ua : IsUnit a) : IsSMulRegular M a := by
rcases ua with ⟨a, rfl⟩
exact a.isSMulRegular M
end Units
section SMulZeroClass
variable {M}
protected
lemma IsSMulRegular.eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero [Zero M] [SMulZeroClass R M]
{r : R} {x : M} (h1 : IsSMulRegular M r) (h2 : r • x = 0) : x = 0 :=
h1 (h2.trans (smul_zero r).symm)
| end SMulZeroClass
lemma Equiv.isSMulRegular_congr {R S M M'} [SMul R M] [SMul S M'] {e : M ≃ M'}
| Mathlib/Algebra/Regular/SMul.lean | 240 | 242 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta, Edward Ayers
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Pullback.HasPullback
import Mathlib.Data.Set.BooleanAlgebra
/-!
# Theory of sieves
- For an object `X` of a category `C`, a `Sieve X` is a set of morphisms to `X`
which is closed under left-composition.
- The complete lattice structure on sieves is given, as well as the Galois insertion
given by downward-closing.
- A `Sieve X` (functorially) induces a presheaf on `C` together with a monomorphism to
the yoneda embedding of `X`.
## Tags
sieve, pullback
-/
universe v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D] (F : C ⥤ D)
variable {X Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ X)
/-- A set of arrows all with codomain `X`. -/
def Presieve (X : C) :=
∀ ⦃Y⦄, Set (Y ⟶ X)-- deriving CompleteLattice
instance : CompleteLattice (Presieve X) := by
dsimp [Presieve]
infer_instance
namespace Presieve
noncomputable instance : Inhabited (Presieve X) :=
⟨⊤⟩
/-- The full subcategory of the over category `C/X` consisting of arrows which belong to a
presieve on `X`. -/
abbrev category {X : C} (P : Presieve X) :=
ObjectProperty.FullSubcategory fun f : Over X => P f.hom
/-- Construct an object of `P.category`. -/
abbrev categoryMk {X : C} (P : Presieve X) {Y : C} (f : Y ⟶ X) (hf : P f) : P.category :=
⟨Over.mk f, hf⟩
/-- Given a sieve `S` on `X : C`, its associated diagram `S.diagram` is defined to be
the natural functor from the full subcategory of the over category `C/X` consisting
of arrows in `S` to `C`. -/
abbrev diagram (S : Presieve X) : S.category ⥤ C :=
ObjectProperty.ι _ ⋙ Over.forget X
/-- Given a sieve `S` on `X : C`, its associated cocone `S.cocone` is defined to be
the natural cocone over the diagram defined above with cocone point `X`. -/
abbrev cocone (S : Presieve X) : Cocone S.diagram :=
(Over.forgetCocone X).whisker (ObjectProperty.ι _)
/-- Given a set of arrows `S` all with codomain `X`, and a set of arrows with codomain `Y` for each
`f : Y ⟶ X` in `S`, produce a set of arrows with codomain `X`:
`{ g ≫ f | (f : Y ⟶ X) ∈ S, (g : Z ⟶ Y) ∈ R f }`.
-/
def bind (S : Presieve X) (R : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Presieve Y) : Presieve X := fun Z h =>
∃ (Y : C) (g : Z ⟶ Y) (f : Y ⟶ X) (H : S f), R H g ∧ g ≫ f = h
/-- Structure which contains the data and properties for a morphism `h` satisfying
`Presieve.bind S R h`. -/
structure BindStruct (S : Presieve X) (R : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Presieve Y)
{Z : C} (h : Z ⟶ X) where
/-- the intermediate object -/
Y : C
/-- a morphism in the family of presieves `R` -/
g : Z ⟶ Y
/-- a morphism in the presieve `S` -/
f : Y ⟶ X
hf : S f
hg : R hf g
fac : g ≫ f = h
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] BindStruct.fac
/-- If a morphism `h` satisfies `Presieve.bind S R h`, this is a choice of a structure
in `BindStruct S R h`. -/
noncomputable def bind.bindStruct {S : Presieve X} {R : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Presieve Y}
{Z : C} {h : Z ⟶ X} (H : bind S R h) : BindStruct S R h :=
Nonempty.some (by
obtain ⟨Y, g, f, hf, hg, fac⟩ := H
exact ⟨{ hf := hf, hg := hg, fac := fac, .. }⟩)
lemma BindStruct.bind {S : Presieve X} {R : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Presieve Y}
{Z : C} {h : Z ⟶ X} (b : BindStruct S R h) : bind S R h :=
⟨b.Y, b.g, b.f, b.hf, b.hg, b.fac⟩
@[simp]
theorem bind_comp {S : Presieve X} {R : ∀ ⦃Y : C⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Presieve Y} {g : Z ⟶ Y}
(h₁ : S f) (h₂ : R h₁ g) : bind S R (g ≫ f) :=
⟨_, _, _, h₁, h₂, rfl⟩
-- Porting note: it seems the definition of `Presieve` must be unfolded in order to define
-- this inductive type, it was thus renamed `singleton'`
-- Note we can't make this into `HasSingleton` because of the out-param.
/-- The singleton presieve. -/
inductive singleton' : ⦃Y : C⦄ → (Y ⟶ X) → Prop
| mk : singleton' f
/-- The singleton presieve. -/
def singleton : Presieve X := singleton' f
lemma singleton.mk {f : Y ⟶ X} : singleton f f := singleton'.mk
@[simp]
theorem singleton_eq_iff_domain (f g : Y ⟶ X) : singleton f g ↔ f = g := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩
rfl
· rintro rfl
apply singleton.mk
theorem singleton_self : singleton f f :=
singleton.mk
/-- Pullback a set of arrows with given codomain along a fixed map, by taking the pullback in the
category.
This is not the same as the arrow set of `Sieve.pullback`, but there is a relation between them
in `pullbackArrows_comm`.
-/
inductive pullbackArrows [HasPullbacks C] (R : Presieve X) : Presieve Y
| mk (Z : C) (h : Z ⟶ X) : R h → pullbackArrows _ (pullback.snd h f)
theorem pullback_singleton [HasPullbacks C] (g : Z ⟶ X) :
pullbackArrows f (singleton g) = singleton (pullback.snd g f) := by
funext W
ext h
constructor
· rintro ⟨W, _, _, _⟩
exact singleton.mk
· rintro ⟨_⟩
exact pullbackArrows.mk Z g singleton.mk
/-- Construct the presieve given by the family of arrows indexed by `ι`. -/
inductive ofArrows {ι : Type*} (Y : ι → C) (f : ∀ i, Y i ⟶ X) : Presieve X
| mk (i : ι) : ofArrows _ _ (f i)
theorem ofArrows_pUnit : (ofArrows _ fun _ : PUnit => f) = singleton f := by
funext Y
ext g
constructor
· rintro ⟨_⟩
apply singleton.mk
· rintro ⟨_⟩
exact ofArrows.mk PUnit.unit
theorem ofArrows_pullback [HasPullbacks C] {ι : Type*} (Z : ι → C) (g : ∀ i : ι, Z i ⟶ X) :
(ofArrows (fun i => pullback (g i) f) fun _ => pullback.snd _ _) =
pullbackArrows f (ofArrows Z g) := by
funext T
ext h
constructor
· rintro ⟨hk⟩
exact pullbackArrows.mk _ _ (ofArrows.mk hk)
· rintro ⟨W, k, ⟨_⟩⟩
apply ofArrows.mk
theorem ofArrows_bind {ι : Type*} (Z : ι → C) (g : ∀ i : ι, Z i ⟶ X)
(j : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X), ofArrows Z g f → Type*) (W : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X) (H), j f H → C)
(k : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X) (H i), W f H i ⟶ Y) :
((ofArrows Z g).bind fun _ f H => ofArrows (W f H) (k f H)) =
ofArrows (fun i : Σi, j _ (ofArrows.mk i) => W (g i.1) _ i.2) fun ij =>
k (g ij.1) _ ij.2 ≫ g ij.1 := by
funext Y
ext f
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, _, _, ⟨i⟩, ⟨i'⟩, rfl⟩
exact ofArrows.mk (Sigma.mk _ _)
· rintro ⟨i⟩
exact bind_comp _ (ofArrows.mk _) (ofArrows.mk _)
theorem ofArrows_surj {ι : Type*} {Y : ι → C} (f : ∀ i, Y i ⟶ X) {Z : C} (g : Z ⟶ X)
(hg : ofArrows Y f g) : ∃ (i : ι) (h : Y i = Z),
g = eqToHom h.symm ≫ f i := by
obtain ⟨i⟩ := hg
exact ⟨i, rfl, by simp only [eqToHom_refl, id_comp]⟩
/-- Given a presieve on `F(X)`, we can define a presieve on `X` by taking the preimage via `F`. -/
def functorPullback (R : Presieve (F.obj X)) : Presieve X := fun _ f => R (F.map f)
@[simp]
theorem functorPullback_mem (R : Presieve (F.obj X)) {Y} (f : Y ⟶ X) :
R.functorPullback F f ↔ R (F.map f) :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem functorPullback_id (R : Presieve X) : R.functorPullback (𝟭 _) = R :=
rfl
/-- Given a presieve `R` on `X`, the predicate `R.hasPullbacks` means that for all arrows `f` and
`g` in `R`, the pullback of `f` and `g` exists. -/
class hasPullbacks (R : Presieve X) : Prop where
/-- For all arrows `f` and `g` in `R`, the pullback of `f` and `g` exists. -/
has_pullbacks : ∀ {Y Z} {f : Y ⟶ X} (_ : R f) {g : Z ⟶ X} (_ : R g), HasPullback f g
instance (R : Presieve X) [HasPullbacks C] : R.hasPullbacks := ⟨fun _ _ ↦ inferInstance⟩
instance {α : Type v₂} {X : α → C} {B : C} (π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B)
[(Presieve.ofArrows X π).hasPullbacks] (a b : α) : HasPullback (π a) (π b) :=
Presieve.hasPullbacks.has_pullbacks (Presieve.ofArrows.mk _) (Presieve.ofArrows.mk _)
section FunctorPushforward
variable {E : Type u₃} [Category.{v₃} E] (G : D ⥤ E)
/-- Given a presieve on `X`, we can define a presieve on `F(X)` (which is actually a sieve)
by taking the sieve generated by the image via `F`.
-/
def functorPushforward (S : Presieve X) : Presieve (F.obj X) := fun Y f =>
∃ (Z : C) (g : Z ⟶ X) (h : Y ⟶ F.obj Z), S g ∧ f = h ≫ F.map g
/-- An auxiliary definition in order to fix the choice of the preimages between various definitions.
-/
structure FunctorPushforwardStructure (S : Presieve X) {Y} (f : Y ⟶ F.obj X) where
/-- an object in the source category -/
preobj : C
/-- a map in the source category which has to be in the presieve -/
premap : preobj ⟶ X
/-- the morphism which appear in the factorisation -/
lift : Y ⟶ F.obj preobj
/-- the condition that `premap` is in the presieve -/
cover : S premap
/-- the factorisation of the morphism -/
fac : f = lift ≫ F.map premap
/-- The fixed choice of a preimage. -/
noncomputable def getFunctorPushforwardStructure {F : C ⥤ D} {S : Presieve X} {Y : D}
{f : Y ⟶ F.obj X} (h : S.functorPushforward F f) : FunctorPushforwardStructure F S f := by
choose Z f' g h₁ h using h
exact ⟨Z, f', g, h₁, h⟩
theorem functorPushforward_comp (R : Presieve X) :
R.functorPushforward (F ⋙ G) = (R.functorPushforward F).functorPushforward G := by
funext x
ext f
constructor
· rintro ⟨X, f₁, g₁, h₁, rfl⟩
exact ⟨F.obj X, F.map f₁, g₁, ⟨X, f₁, 𝟙 _, h₁, by simp⟩, rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨X, f₁, g₁, ⟨X', f₂, g₂, h₁, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨X', f₂, g₁ ≫ G.map g₂, h₁, by simp⟩
theorem image_mem_functorPushforward (R : Presieve X) {f : Y ⟶ X} (h : R f) :
R.functorPushforward F (F.map f) :=
⟨Y, f, 𝟙 _, h, by simp⟩
end FunctorPushforward
end Presieve
/--
For an object `X` of a category `C`, a `Sieve X` is a set of morphisms to `X` which is closed under
left-composition.
-/
structure Sieve {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] (X : C) where
/-- the underlying presieve -/
arrows : Presieve X
/-- stability by precomposition -/
downward_closed : ∀ {Y Z f} (_ : arrows f) (g : Z ⟶ Y), arrows (g ≫ f)
namespace Sieve
instance : CoeFun (Sieve X) fun _ => Presieve X :=
⟨Sieve.arrows⟩
initialize_simps_projections Sieve (arrows → apply)
variable {S R : Sieve X}
attribute [simp] downward_closed
theorem arrows_ext : ∀ {R S : Sieve X}, R.arrows = S.arrows → R = S := by
rintro ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ rfl
rfl
@[ext]
protected theorem ext {R S : Sieve X} (h : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X), R f ↔ S f) : R = S :=
arrows_ext <| funext fun _ => funext fun f => propext <| h f
open Lattice
/-- The supremum of a collection of sieves: the union of them all. -/
protected def sup (𝒮 : Set (Sieve X)) : Sieve X where
arrows _ := { f | ∃ S ∈ 𝒮, Sieve.arrows S f }
downward_closed {_ _ f} hf _ := by
obtain ⟨S, hS, hf⟩ := hf
exact ⟨S, hS, S.downward_closed hf _⟩
/-- The infimum of a collection of sieves: the intersection of them all. -/
protected def inf (𝒮 : Set (Sieve X)) : Sieve X where
arrows _ := { f | ∀ S ∈ 𝒮, Sieve.arrows S f }
downward_closed {_ _ _} hf g S H := S.downward_closed (hf S H) g
/-- The union of two sieves is a sieve. -/
protected def union (S R : Sieve X) : Sieve X where
arrows _ f := S f ∨ R f
downward_closed := by rintro _ _ _ (h | h) g <;> simp [h]
/-- The intersection of two sieves is a sieve. -/
protected def inter (S R : Sieve X) : Sieve X where
arrows _ f := S f ∧ R f
downward_closed := by
rintro _ _ _ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ g
simp [h₁, h₂]
/-- Sieves on an object `X` form a complete lattice.
We generate this directly rather than using the galois insertion for nicer definitional properties.
-/
instance : CompleteLattice (Sieve X) where
le S R := ∀ ⦃Y⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X), S f → R f
le_refl _ _ _ := id
le_trans _ _ _ S₁₂ S₂₃ _ _ h := S₂₃ _ (S₁₂ _ h)
le_antisymm _ _ p q := Sieve.ext fun _ _ => ⟨p _, q _⟩
top :=
{ arrows := fun _ => Set.univ
downward_closed := fun _ _ => ⟨⟩ }
bot :=
{ arrows := fun _ => ∅
downward_closed := False.elim }
sup := Sieve.union
inf := Sieve.inter
sSup := Sieve.sup
sInf := Sieve.inf
le_sSup _ S hS _ _ hf := ⟨S, hS, hf⟩
sSup_le := fun _ _ ha _ _ ⟨b, hb, hf⟩ => (ha b hb) _ hf
sInf_le _ _ hS _ _ h := h _ hS
le_sInf _ _ hS _ _ hf _ hR := hS _ hR _ hf
le_sup_left _ _ _ _ := Or.inl
le_sup_right _ _ _ _ := Or.inr
sup_le _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _ f := by--ℰ S hS Y f := by
rintro (hf | hf)
· exact h₁ _ hf
· exact h₂ _ hf
inf_le_left _ _ _ _ := And.left
inf_le_right _ _ _ _ := And.right
le_inf _ _ _ p q _ _ z := ⟨p _ z, q _ z⟩
le_top _ _ _ _ := trivial
bot_le _ _ _ := False.elim
/-- The maximal sieve always exists. -/
instance sieveInhabited : Inhabited (Sieve X) :=
⟨⊤⟩
@[simp]
theorem sInf_apply {Ss : Set (Sieve X)} {Y} (f : Y ⟶ X) :
sInf Ss f ↔ ∀ (S : Sieve X) (_ : S ∈ Ss), S f :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem sSup_apply {Ss : Set (Sieve X)} {Y} (f : Y ⟶ X) :
sSup Ss f ↔ ∃ (S : Sieve X) (_ : S ∈ Ss), S f := by
simp [sSup, Sieve.sup, setOf]
@[simp]
theorem inter_apply {R S : Sieve X} {Y} (f : Y ⟶ X) : (R ⊓ S) f ↔ R f ∧ S f :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem union_apply {R S : Sieve X} {Y} (f : Y ⟶ X) : (R ⊔ S) f ↔ R f ∨ S f :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_apply (f : Y ⟶ X) : (⊤ : Sieve X) f :=
trivial
/-- Generate the smallest sieve containing the given set of arrows. -/
@[simps]
def generate (R : Presieve X) : Sieve X where
arrows Z f := ∃ (Y : _) (h : Z ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ X), R g ∧ h ≫ g = f
downward_closed := by
rintro Y Z _ ⟨W, g, f, hf, rfl⟩ h
exact ⟨_, h ≫ g, _, hf, by simp⟩
/-- Given a presieve on `X`, and a sieve on each domain of an arrow in the presieve, we can bind to
produce a sieve on `X`.
-/
@[simps]
def bind (S : Presieve X) (R : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Sieve Y) : Sieve X where
arrows := S.bind fun _ _ h => R h
downward_closed := by
rintro Y Z f ⟨W, f, h, hh, hf, rfl⟩ g
exact ⟨_, g ≫ f, _, hh, by simp [hf]⟩
/-- Structure which contains the data and properties for a morphism `h` satisfying
`Sieve.bind S R h`. -/
abbrev BindStruct (S : Presieve X) (R : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Sieve Y)
{Z : C} (h : Z ⟶ X) :=
Presieve.BindStruct S (fun _ _ hf ↦ R hf) h
open Order Lattice
theorem generate_le_iff (R : Presieve X) (S : Sieve X) : generate R ≤ S ↔ R ≤ S :=
⟨fun H _ _ hg => H _ ⟨_, 𝟙 _, _, hg, id_comp _⟩, fun ss Y f => by
rintro ⟨Z, f, g, hg, rfl⟩
exact S.downward_closed (ss Z hg) f⟩
/-- Show that there is a galois insertion (generate, set_over). -/
def giGenerate : GaloisInsertion (generate : Presieve X → Sieve X) arrows where
gc := generate_le_iff
choice 𝒢 _ := generate 𝒢
choice_eq _ _ := rfl
le_l_u _ _ _ hf := ⟨_, 𝟙 _, _, hf, id_comp _⟩
theorem le_generate (R : Presieve X) : R ≤ generate R :=
giGenerate.gc.le_u_l R
@[simp]
theorem generate_sieve (S : Sieve X) : generate S = S :=
giGenerate.l_u_eq S
/-- If the identity arrow is in a sieve, the sieve is maximal. -/
theorem id_mem_iff_eq_top : S (𝟙 X) ↔ S = ⊤ :=
⟨fun h => top_unique fun Y f _ => by simpa using downward_closed _ h f, fun h => h.symm ▸ trivial⟩
/-- If an arrow set contains a split epi, it generates the maximal sieve. -/
theorem generate_of_contains_isSplitEpi {R : Presieve X} (f : Y ⟶ X) [IsSplitEpi f] (hf : R f) :
generate R = ⊤ := by
rw [← id_mem_iff_eq_top]
exact ⟨_, section_ f, f, hf, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem generate_of_singleton_isSplitEpi (f : Y ⟶ X) [IsSplitEpi f] :
generate (Presieve.singleton f) = ⊤ :=
generate_of_contains_isSplitEpi f (Presieve.singleton_self _)
@[simp]
theorem generate_top : generate (⊤ : Presieve X) = ⊤ :=
generate_of_contains_isSplitEpi (𝟙 _) ⟨⟩
@[simp]
| lemma comp_mem_iff (i : X ⟶ Y) (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso i] (S : Sieve Z) :
S (i ≫ f) ↔ S f := by
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Sieves.lean | 444 | 445 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Tian Chen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Tian Chen, Mantas Bakšys
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GeomSum
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Parity
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Sum
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime.Int
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicVal.Defs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Defs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Span
/-!
# Multiplicity in Number Theory
This file contains results in number theory relating to multiplicity.
## Main statements
* `multiplicity.Int.pow_sub_pow` is the lifting the exponent lemma for odd primes.
We also prove several variations of the lemma.
## References
* [Wikipedia, *Lifting-the-exponent lemma*]
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lifting-the-exponent_lemma)
-/
open Ideal Ideal.Quotient Finset
variable {R : Type*} {n : ℕ}
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] {a b x y : R}
theorem dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub {x y p : R} (h : p ∣ x - y) :
(p ∣ ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) ↔ p ∣ n * y ^ (n - 1) := by
rw [← mem_span_singleton, ← Ideal.Quotient.eq] at h
simp only [← mem_span_singleton, ← eq_zero_iff_mem, RingHom.map_geom_sum₂, h, geom_sum₂_self,
map_mul, map_pow, map_natCast]
| theorem dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub' {x y p : R} (h : p ∣ x - y) :
(p ∣ ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) ↔ p ∣ n * x ^ (n - 1) := by
rw [geom_sum₂_comm, dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub]; simpa using h.neg_right
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Multiplicity.lean | 46 | 48 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Topology
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Analysis.Seminorm
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.Bounded
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Basic
/-!
# The Minkowski functional
This file defines the Minkowski functional, aka gauge.
The Minkowski functional of a set `s` is the function which associates each point to how much you
need to scale `s` for `x` to be inside it. When `s` is symmetric, convex and absorbent, its gauge is
a seminorm. Reciprocally, any seminorm arises as the gauge of some set, namely its unit ball. This
induces the equivalence of seminorms and locally convex topological vector spaces.
## Main declarations
For a real vector space,
* `gauge`: Aka Minkowski functional. `gauge s x` is the least (actually, an infimum) `r` such
that `x ∈ r • s`.
* `gaugeSeminorm`: The Minkowski functional as a seminorm, when `s` is symmetric, convex and
absorbent.
## References
* [H. H. Schaefer, *Topological Vector Spaces*][schaefer1966]
## Tags
Minkowski functional, gauge
-/
open NormedField Set
open scoped Pointwise Topology NNReal
noncomputable section
variable {𝕜 E : Type*}
section AddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup E] [Module ℝ E]
/-- The Minkowski functional. Given a set `s` in a real vector space, `gauge s` is the functional
which sends `x : E` to the smallest `r : ℝ` such that `x` is in `s` scaled by `r`. -/
def gauge (s : Set E) (x : E) : ℝ :=
sInf { r : ℝ | 0 < r ∧ x ∈ r • s }
variable {s t : Set E} {x : E} {a : ℝ}
theorem gauge_def : gauge s x = sInf ({ r ∈ Set.Ioi (0 : ℝ) | x ∈ r • s }) :=
rfl
/-- An alternative definition of the gauge using scalar multiplication on the element rather than on
the set. -/
theorem gauge_def' : gauge s x = sInf {r ∈ Set.Ioi (0 : ℝ) | r⁻¹ • x ∈ s} := by
congrm sInf {r | ?_}
exact and_congr_right fun hr => mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hr.ne' _ _
private theorem gauge_set_bddBelow : BddBelow { r : ℝ | 0 < r ∧ x ∈ r • s } :=
⟨0, fun _ hr => hr.1.le⟩
/-- If the given subset is `Absorbent` then the set we take an infimum over in `gauge` is nonempty,
which is useful for proving many properties about the gauge. -/
theorem Absorbent.gauge_set_nonempty (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) :
{ r : ℝ | 0 < r ∧ x ∈ r • s }.Nonempty :=
let ⟨r, hr₁, hr₂⟩ := (absorbs x).exists_pos
⟨r, hr₁, hr₂ r (Real.norm_of_nonneg hr₁.le).ge rfl⟩
theorem gauge_mono (hs : Absorbent ℝ s) (h : s ⊆ t) : gauge t ≤ gauge s := fun _ =>
csInf_le_csInf gauge_set_bddBelow hs.gauge_set_nonempty fun _ hr => ⟨hr.1, smul_set_mono h hr.2⟩
theorem exists_lt_of_gauge_lt (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (h : gauge s x < a) :
∃ b, 0 < b ∧ b < a ∧ x ∈ b • s := by
obtain ⟨b, ⟨hb, hx⟩, hba⟩ := exists_lt_of_csInf_lt absorbs.gauge_set_nonempty h
exact ⟨b, hb, hba, hx⟩
/-- The gauge evaluated at `0` is always zero (mathematically this requires `0` to be in the set `s`
but, the real infimum of the empty set in Lean being defined as `0`, it holds unconditionally). -/
@[simp]
theorem gauge_zero : gauge s 0 = 0 := by
rw [gauge_def']
by_cases h : (0 : E) ∈ s
· simp only [smul_zero, sep_true, h, csInf_Ioi]
· simp only [smul_zero, sep_false, h, Real.sInf_empty]
@[simp]
theorem gauge_zero' : gauge (0 : Set E) = 0 := by
ext x
rw [gauge_def']
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· simp only [csInf_Ioi, mem_zero, Pi.zero_apply, eq_self_iff_true, sep_true, smul_zero]
· simp only [mem_zero, Pi.zero_apply, inv_eq_zero, smul_eq_zero]
convert Real.sInf_empty
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun r hr => hr.2.elim (ne_of_gt hr.1) hx
@[simp]
theorem gauge_empty : gauge (∅ : Set E) = 0 := by
ext
simp only [gauge_def', Real.sInf_empty, mem_empty_iff_false, Pi.zero_apply, sep_false]
theorem gauge_of_subset_zero (h : s ⊆ 0) : gauge s = 0 := by
obtain rfl | rfl := subset_singleton_iff_eq.1 h
exacts [gauge_empty, gauge_zero']
/-- The gauge is always nonnegative. -/
theorem gauge_nonneg (x : E) : 0 ≤ gauge s x :=
Real.sInf_nonneg fun _ hx => hx.1.le
theorem gauge_neg (symmetric : ∀ x ∈ s, -x ∈ s) (x : E) : gauge s (-x) = gauge s x := by
have : ∀ x, -x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ s := fun x => ⟨fun h => by simpa using symmetric _ h, symmetric x⟩
simp_rw [gauge_def', smul_neg, this]
theorem gauge_neg_set_neg (x : E) : gauge (-s) (-x) = gauge s x := by
simp_rw [gauge_def', smul_neg, neg_mem_neg]
theorem gauge_neg_set_eq_gauge_neg (x : E) : gauge (-s) x = gauge s (-x) := by
rw [← gauge_neg_set_neg, neg_neg]
theorem gauge_le_of_mem (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hx : x ∈ a • s) : gauge s x ≤ a := by
obtain rfl | ha' := ha.eq_or_lt
· rw [mem_singleton_iff.1 (zero_smul_set_subset _ hx), gauge_zero]
· exact csInf_le gauge_set_bddBelow ⟨ha', hx⟩
theorem gauge_le_eq (hs₁ : Convex ℝ s) (hs₀ : (0 : E) ∈ s) (hs₂ : Absorbent ℝ s) (ha : 0 ≤ a) :
{ x | gauge s x ≤ a } = ⋂ (r : ℝ) (_ : a < r), r • s := by
ext x
simp_rw [Set.mem_iInter, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
refine ⟨fun h r hr => ?_, fun h => le_of_forall_pos_lt_add fun ε hε => ?_⟩
· have hr' := ha.trans_lt hr
rw [mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hr'.ne']
obtain ⟨δ, δ_pos, hδr, hδ⟩ := exists_lt_of_gauge_lt hs₂ (h.trans_lt hr)
suffices (r⁻¹ * δ) • δ⁻¹ • x ∈ s by rwa [smul_smul, mul_inv_cancel_right₀ δ_pos.ne'] at this
rw [mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ δ_pos.ne'] at hδ
refine hs₁.smul_mem_of_zero_mem hs₀ hδ ⟨by positivity, ?_⟩
rw [inv_mul_le_iff₀ hr', mul_one]
exact hδr.le
· have hε' := (lt_add_iff_pos_right a).2 (half_pos hε)
exact
(gauge_le_of_mem (ha.trans hε'.le) <| h _ hε').trans_lt (add_lt_add_left (half_lt_self hε) _)
theorem gauge_lt_eq' (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (a : ℝ) :
{ x | gauge s x < a } = ⋃ (r : ℝ) (_ : 0 < r) (_ : r < a), r • s := by
ext
simp_rw [mem_setOf, mem_iUnion, exists_prop]
exact
⟨exists_lt_of_gauge_lt absorbs, fun ⟨r, hr₀, hr₁, hx⟩ =>
(gauge_le_of_mem hr₀.le hx).trans_lt hr₁⟩
theorem gauge_lt_eq (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (a : ℝ) :
{ x | gauge s x < a } = ⋃ r ∈ Set.Ioo 0 (a : ℝ), r • s := by
ext
simp_rw [mem_setOf, mem_iUnion, exists_prop, mem_Ioo, and_assoc]
exact
⟨exists_lt_of_gauge_lt absorbs, fun ⟨r, hr₀, hr₁, hx⟩ =>
(gauge_le_of_mem hr₀.le hx).trans_lt hr₁⟩
theorem mem_openSegment_of_gauge_lt_one (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (hgauge : gauge s x < 1) :
∃ y ∈ s, x ∈ openSegment ℝ 0 y := by
rcases exists_lt_of_gauge_lt absorbs hgauge with ⟨r, hr₀, hr₁, y, hy, rfl⟩
refine ⟨y, hy, 1 - r, r, ?_⟩
simp [*]
theorem gauge_lt_one_subset_self (hs : Convex ℝ s) (h₀ : (0 : E) ∈ s) (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) :
{ x | gauge s x < 1 } ⊆ s := fun _x hx ↦
let ⟨_y, hys, hx⟩ := mem_openSegment_of_gauge_lt_one absorbs hx
hs.openSegment_subset h₀ hys hx
theorem gauge_le_one_of_mem {x : E} (hx : x ∈ s) : gauge s x ≤ 1 :=
gauge_le_of_mem zero_le_one <| by rwa [one_smul]
/-- Gauge is subadditive. -/
theorem gauge_add_le (hs : Convex ℝ s) (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (x y : E) :
gauge s (x + y) ≤ gauge s x + gauge s y := by
refine le_of_forall_pos_lt_add fun ε hε => ?_
obtain ⟨a, ha, ha', x, hx, rfl⟩ :=
exists_lt_of_gauge_lt absorbs (lt_add_of_pos_right (gauge s x) (half_pos hε))
obtain ⟨b, hb, hb', y, hy, rfl⟩ :=
exists_lt_of_gauge_lt absorbs (lt_add_of_pos_right (gauge s y) (half_pos hε))
calc
gauge s (a • x + b • y) ≤ a + b := gauge_le_of_mem (by positivity) <| by
rw [hs.add_smul ha.le hb.le]
exact add_mem_add (smul_mem_smul_set hx) (smul_mem_smul_set hy)
_ < gauge s (a • x) + gauge s (b • y) + ε := by linarith
theorem self_subset_gauge_le_one : s ⊆ { x | gauge s x ≤ 1 } := fun _ => gauge_le_one_of_mem
theorem Convex.gauge_le (hs : Convex ℝ s) (h₀ : (0 : E) ∈ s) (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (a : ℝ) :
Convex ℝ { x | gauge s x ≤ a } := by
by_cases ha : 0 ≤ a
· rw [gauge_le_eq hs h₀ absorbs ha]
exact convex_iInter fun i => convex_iInter fun _ => hs.smul _
· convert convex_empty (𝕜 := ℝ)
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun x hx => ha <| (gauge_nonneg _).trans hx
theorem Balanced.starConvex (hs : Balanced ℝ s) : StarConvex ℝ 0 s :=
starConvex_zero_iff.2 fun _ hx a ha₀ ha₁ =>
hs _ (by rwa [Real.norm_of_nonneg ha₀]) (smul_mem_smul_set hx)
theorem le_gauge_of_not_mem (hs₀ : StarConvex ℝ 0 s) (hs₂ : Absorbs ℝ s {x}) (hx : x ∉ a • s) :
a ≤ gauge s x := by
rw [starConvex_zero_iff] at hs₀
obtain ⟨r, hr, h⟩ := hs₂.exists_pos
refine le_csInf ⟨r, hr, singleton_subset_iff.1 <| h _ (Real.norm_of_nonneg hr.le).ge⟩ ?_
rintro b ⟨hb, x, hx', rfl⟩
refine not_lt.1 fun hba => hx ?_
have ha := hb.trans hba
refine ⟨(a⁻¹ * b) • x, hs₀ hx' (by positivity) ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← div_eq_inv_mul]
exact div_le_one_of_le₀ hba.le ha.le
· dsimp only
rw [← mul_smul, mul_inv_cancel_left₀ ha.ne']
theorem one_le_gauge_of_not_mem (hs₁ : StarConvex ℝ 0 s) (hs₂ : Absorbs ℝ s {x}) (hx : x ∉ s) :
1 ≤ gauge s x :=
le_gauge_of_not_mem hs₁ hs₂ <| by rwa [one_smul]
section LinearOrderedField
variable {α : Type*} [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
[MulActionWithZero α ℝ] [OrderedSMul α ℝ]
theorem gauge_smul_of_nonneg [MulActionWithZero α E] [IsScalarTower α ℝ (Set E)] {s : Set E} {a : α}
(ha : 0 ≤ a) (x : E) : gauge s (a • x) = a • gauge s x := by
obtain rfl | ha' := ha.eq_or_lt
· rw [zero_smul, gauge_zero, zero_smul]
rw [gauge_def', gauge_def', ← Real.sInf_smul_of_nonneg ha]
congr 1
ext r
simp_rw [Set.mem_smul_set, Set.mem_sep_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨hr, hx⟩
simp_rw [mem_Ioi] at hr ⊢
rw [← mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hr.ne'] at hx
have := smul_pos (inv_pos.2 ha') hr
refine ⟨a⁻¹ • r, ⟨this, ?_⟩, smul_inv_smul₀ ha'.ne' _⟩
rwa [← mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ this.ne', smul_assoc,
mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ (inv_ne_zero ha'.ne'), inv_inv]
· rintro ⟨r, ⟨hr, hx⟩, rfl⟩
rw [mem_Ioi] at hr ⊢
rw [← mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hr.ne'] at hx
have := smul_pos ha' hr
refine ⟨this, ?_⟩
rw [← mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ this.ne', smul_assoc]
exact smul_mem_smul_set hx
theorem gauge_smul_left_of_nonneg [MulActionWithZero α E] [SMulCommClass α ℝ ℝ]
[IsScalarTower α ℝ ℝ] [IsScalarTower α ℝ E] {s : Set E} {a : α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) :
gauge (a • s) = a⁻¹ • gauge s := by
obtain rfl | ha' := ha.eq_or_lt
· rw [inv_zero, zero_smul, gauge_of_subset_zero (zero_smul_set_subset _)]
ext x
rw [gauge_def', Pi.smul_apply, gauge_def', ← Real.sInf_smul_of_nonneg (inv_nonneg.2 ha)]
congr 1
ext r
simp_rw [Set.mem_smul_set, Set.mem_sep_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨hr, y, hy, h⟩
simp_rw [mem_Ioi] at hr ⊢
refine ⟨a • r, ⟨smul_pos ha' hr, ?_⟩, inv_smul_smul₀ ha'.ne' _⟩
rwa [smul_inv₀, smul_assoc, ← h, inv_smul_smul₀ ha'.ne']
· rintro ⟨r, ⟨hr, hx⟩, rfl⟩
rw [mem_Ioi] at hr ⊢
refine ⟨smul_pos (inv_pos.2 ha') hr, r⁻¹ • x, hx, ?_⟩
rw [smul_inv₀, smul_assoc, inv_inv]
theorem gauge_smul_left [Module α E] [SMulCommClass α ℝ ℝ] [IsScalarTower α ℝ ℝ]
[IsScalarTower α ℝ E] {s : Set E} (symmetric : ∀ x ∈ s, -x ∈ s) (a : α) :
gauge (a • s) = |a|⁻¹ • gauge s := by
rw [← gauge_smul_left_of_nonneg (abs_nonneg a)]
obtain h | h := abs_choice a
· rw [h]
· rw [h, Set.neg_smul_set, ← Set.smul_set_neg]
-- Porting note: was congr
apply congr_arg
apply congr_arg
ext y
refine ⟨symmetric _, fun hy => ?_⟩
rw [← neg_neg y]
exact symmetric _ hy
end LinearOrderedField
section RCLike
variable [RCLike 𝕜] [Module 𝕜 E] [IsScalarTower ℝ 𝕜 E]
theorem gauge_norm_smul (hs : Balanced 𝕜 s) (r : 𝕜) (x : E) :
gauge s (‖r‖ • x) = gauge s (r • x) := by
unfold gauge
congr with θ
rw [@RCLike.real_smul_eq_coe_smul 𝕜]
refine and_congr_right fun hθ => (hs.smul _).smul_mem_iff ?_
rw [RCLike.norm_ofReal, abs_norm]
/-- If `s` is balanced, then the Minkowski functional is ℂ-homogeneous. -/
theorem gauge_smul (hs : Balanced 𝕜 s) (r : 𝕜) (x : E) : gauge s (r • x) = ‖r‖ * gauge s x := by
rw [← smul_eq_mul, ← gauge_smul_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg r), gauge_norm_smul hs]
end RCLike
open Filter
section TopologicalSpace
variable [TopologicalSpace E]
theorem comap_gauge_nhds_zero_le (ha : Absorbent ℝ s) (hb : Bornology.IsVonNBounded ℝ s) :
comap (gauge s) (𝓝 0) ≤ 𝓝 0 := fun u hu ↦ by
rcases (hb hu).exists_pos with ⟨r, hr₀, hr⟩
filter_upwards [preimage_mem_comap (gt_mem_nhds (inv_pos.2 hr₀))] with x (hx : gauge s x < r⁻¹)
rcases exists_lt_of_gauge_lt ha hx with ⟨c, hc₀, hcr, y, hy, rfl⟩
have hrc := (lt_inv_comm₀ hr₀ hc₀).2 hcr
rcases hr c⁻¹ (hrc.le.trans (le_abs_self _)) hy with ⟨z, hz, rfl⟩
simpa only [smul_inv_smul₀ hc₀.ne']
variable [T1Space E]
theorem gauge_eq_zero (hs : Absorbent ℝ s) (hb : Bornology.IsVonNBounded ℝ s) :
gauge s x = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h₀ ↦ by_contra fun (hne : x ≠ 0) ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ h.symm ▸ gauge_zero⟩
have : {x}ᶜ ∈ comap (gauge s) (𝓝 0) :=
comap_gauge_nhds_zero_le hs hb (isOpen_compl_singleton.mem_nhds hne.symm)
rcases ((nhds_basis_zero_abs_lt _).comap _).mem_iff.1 this with ⟨r, hr₀, hr⟩
exact hr (by simpa [h₀]) rfl
theorem gauge_pos (hs : Absorbent ℝ s) (hb : Bornology.IsVonNBounded ℝ s) :
0 < gauge s x ↔ x ≠ 0 := by
simp only [(gauge_nonneg _).gt_iff_ne, Ne, gauge_eq_zero hs hb]
end TopologicalSpace
section ContinuousSMul
variable [TopologicalSpace E] [ContinuousSMul ℝ E]
open Filter in
theorem interior_subset_gauge_lt_one (s : Set E) : interior s ⊆ { x | gauge s x < 1 } := by
intro x hx
have H₁ : Tendsto (fun r : ℝ ↦ r⁻¹ • x) (𝓝[<] 1) (𝓝 ((1 : ℝ)⁻¹ • x)) :=
((tendsto_id.inv₀ one_ne_zero).smul tendsto_const_nhds).mono_left inf_le_left
rw [inv_one, one_smul] at H₁
have H₂ : ∀ᶠ r in 𝓝[<] (1 : ℝ), x ∈ r • s ∧ 0 < r ∧ r < 1 := by
filter_upwards [H₁ (mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.1 hx), Ioo_mem_nhdsLT one_pos] with r h₁ h₂
exact ⟨(mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ h₂.1.ne' _ _).2 h₁, h₂⟩
rcases H₂.exists with ⟨r, hxr, hr₀, hr₁⟩
exact (gauge_le_of_mem hr₀.le hxr).trans_lt hr₁
theorem gauge_lt_one_eq_self_of_isOpen (hs₁ : Convex ℝ s) (hs₀ : (0 : E) ∈ s) (hs₂ : IsOpen s) :
{ x | gauge s x < 1 } = s := by
refine (gauge_lt_one_subset_self hs₁ ‹_› <| absorbent_nhds_zero <| hs₂.mem_nhds hs₀).antisymm ?_
| convert interior_subset_gauge_lt_one s
exact hs₂.interior_eq.symm
theorem gauge_lt_one_of_mem_of_isOpen (hs₂ : IsOpen s) {x : E} (hx : x ∈ s) :
gauge s x < 1 :=
interior_subset_gauge_lt_one s <| by rwa [hs₂.interior_eq]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Gauge.lean | 358 | 364 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kevin Kappelmann. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Kappelmann
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.ContinuedFractions.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Basic
/-!
# Basic Translation Lemmas Between Functions Defined for Continued Fractions
## Summary
Some simple translation lemmas between the different definitions of functions defined in
`Algebra.ContinuedFractions.Basic`.
-/
namespace GenContFract
section General
/-!
### Translations Between General Access Functions
Here we give some basic translations that hold by definition between the various methods that allow
us to access the numerators and denominators of a continued fraction.
-/
variable {α : Type*} {g : GenContFract α} {n : ℕ}
theorem terminatedAt_iff_s_terminatedAt : g.TerminatedAt n ↔ g.s.TerminatedAt n := by rfl
theorem terminatedAt_iff_s_none : g.TerminatedAt n ↔ g.s.get? n = none := by rfl
theorem partNum_none_iff_s_none : g.partNums.get? n = none ↔ g.s.get? n = none := by
cases s_nth_eq : g.s.get? n <;> simp [partNums, s_nth_eq]
theorem terminatedAt_iff_partNum_none : g.TerminatedAt n ↔ g.partNums.get? n = none := by
rw [terminatedAt_iff_s_none, partNum_none_iff_s_none]
theorem partDen_none_iff_s_none : g.partDens.get? n = none ↔ g.s.get? n = none := by
cases s_nth_eq : g.s.get? n <;> simp [partDens, s_nth_eq]
theorem terminatedAt_iff_partDen_none : g.TerminatedAt n ↔ g.partDens.get? n = none := by
rw [terminatedAt_iff_s_none, partDen_none_iff_s_none]
theorem partNum_eq_s_a {gp : Pair α} (s_nth_eq : g.s.get? n = some gp) :
g.partNums.get? n = some gp.a := by simp [partNums, s_nth_eq]
theorem partDen_eq_s_b {gp : Pair α} (s_nth_eq : g.s.get? n = some gp) :
g.partDens.get? n = some gp.b := by simp [partDens, s_nth_eq]
theorem exists_s_a_of_partNum {a : α} (nth_partNum_eq : g.partNums.get? n = some a) :
∃ gp, g.s.get? n = some gp ∧ gp.a = a := by
simpa [partNums, Stream'.Seq.map_get?] using nth_partNum_eq
theorem exists_s_b_of_partDen {b : α}
(nth_partDen_eq : g.partDens.get? n = some b) :
∃ gp, g.s.get? n = some gp ∧ gp.b = b := by
simpa [partDens, Stream'.Seq.map_get?] using nth_partDen_eq
end General
section WithDivisionRing
/-!
### Translations Between Computational Functions
Here we give some basic translations that hold by definition for the computational methods of a
continued fraction.
-/
variable {K : Type*} {g : GenContFract K} {n : ℕ} [DivisionRing K]
theorem nth_cont_eq_succ_nth_contAux : g.conts n = g.contsAux (n + 1) :=
rfl
theorem num_eq_conts_a : g.nums n = (g.conts n).a :=
rfl
theorem den_eq_conts_b : g.dens n = (g.conts n).b :=
rfl
theorem conv_eq_num_div_den : g.convs n = g.nums n / g.dens n :=
rfl
theorem conv_eq_conts_a_div_conts_b :
g.convs n = (g.conts n).a / (g.conts n).b :=
rfl
theorem exists_conts_a_of_num {A : K} (nth_num_eq : g.nums n = A) :
∃ conts, g.conts n = conts ∧ conts.a = A := by simpa
theorem exists_conts_b_of_den {B : K} (nth_denom_eq : g.dens n = B) :
∃ conts, g.conts n = conts ∧ conts.b = B := by simpa
@[simp]
theorem zeroth_contAux_eq_one_zero : g.contsAux 0 = ⟨1, 0⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem first_contAux_eq_h_one : g.contsAux 1 = ⟨g.h, 1⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zeroth_cont_eq_h_one : g.conts 0 = ⟨g.h, 1⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zeroth_num_eq_h : g.nums 0 = g.h :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zeroth_den_eq_one : g.dens 0 = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zeroth_conv_eq_h : g.convs 0 = g.h := by
simp [conv_eq_num_div_den, num_eq_conts_a, den_eq_conts_b, div_one]
theorem second_contAux_eq {gp : Pair K} (zeroth_s_eq : g.s.get? 0 = some gp) :
g.contsAux 2 = ⟨gp.b * g.h + gp.a, gp.b⟩ := by
simp [zeroth_s_eq, contsAux, nextConts, nextDen, nextNum]
theorem first_cont_eq {gp : Pair K} (zeroth_s_eq : g.s.get? 0 = some gp) :
g.conts 1 = ⟨gp.b * g.h + gp.a, gp.b⟩ := by
simp [nth_cont_eq_succ_nth_contAux, second_contAux_eq zeroth_s_eq]
theorem first_num_eq {gp : Pair K} (zeroth_s_eq : g.s.get? 0 = some gp) :
g.nums 1 = gp.b * g.h + gp.a := by simp [num_eq_conts_a, first_cont_eq zeroth_s_eq]
theorem first_den_eq {gp : Pair K} (zeroth_s_eq : g.s.get? 0 = some gp) :
g.dens 1 = gp.b := by simp [den_eq_conts_b, first_cont_eq zeroth_s_eq]
@[simp]
theorem zeroth_conv'Aux_eq_zero {s : Stream'.Seq <| Pair K} :
convs'Aux s 0 = (0 : K) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zeroth_conv'_eq_h : g.convs' 0 = g.h := by simp [convs']
theorem convs'Aux_succ_none {s : Stream'.Seq (Pair K)} (h : s.head = none) (n : ℕ) :
convs'Aux s (n + 1) = 0 := by simp [convs'Aux, h]
theorem convs'Aux_succ_some {s : Stream'.Seq (Pair K)} {p : Pair K} (h : s.head = some p)
(n : ℕ) : convs'Aux s (n + 1) = p.a / (p.b + convs'Aux s.tail n) := by
simp [convs'Aux, h]
end WithDivisionRing
end GenContFract
| Mathlib/Algebra/ContinuedFractions/Translations.lean | 184 | 186 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.Submodule
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.Finrank
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.InvariantBasisNumber
/-!
# Lemmas about rank and finrank in rings satisfying strong rank condition.
## Main statements
For modules over rings satisfying the rank condition
* `Basis.le_span`:
the cardinality of a basis is bounded by the cardinality of any spanning set
For modules over rings satisfying the strong rank condition
* `linearIndependent_le_span`:
For any linearly independent family `v : ι → M`
and any finite spanning set `w : Set M`,
the cardinality of `ι` is bounded by the cardinality of `w`.
* `linearIndependent_le_basis`:
If `b` is a basis for a module `M`,
and `s` is a linearly independent set,
then the cardinality of `s` is bounded by the cardinality of `b`.
For modules over rings with invariant basis number
(including all commutative rings and all noetherian rings)
* `mk_eq_mk_of_basis`: the dimension theorem, any two bases of the same vector space have the same
cardinality.
## Additional definition
* `Algebra.IsQuadraticExtension`: An extension of rings `R ⊆ S` is quadratic if `S` is a
free `R`-algebra of rank `2`.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u v w w'
variable {R : Type u} {M : Type v} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable {ι : Type w} {ι' : Type w'}
open Cardinal Basis Submodule Function Set Module
attribute [local instance] nontrivial_of_invariantBasisNumber
section InvariantBasisNumber
variable [InvariantBasisNumber R]
/-- The dimension theorem: if `v` and `v'` are two bases, their index types
have the same cardinalities. -/
theorem mk_eq_mk_of_basis (v : Basis ι R M) (v' : Basis ι' R M) :
Cardinal.lift.{w'} #ι = Cardinal.lift.{w} #ι' := by
classical
haveI := nontrivial_of_invariantBasisNumber R
cases fintypeOrInfinite ι
· -- `v` is a finite basis, so by `basis_finite_of_finite_spans` so is `v'`.
-- haveI : Finite (range v) := Set.finite_range v
haveI := basis_finite_of_finite_spans (Set.finite_range v) v.span_eq v'
cases nonempty_fintype ι'
-- We clean up a little:
rw [Cardinal.mk_fintype, Cardinal.mk_fintype]
simp only [Cardinal.lift_natCast, Nat.cast_inj]
-- Now we can use invariant basis number to show they have the same cardinality.
apply card_eq_of_linearEquiv R
exact
(Finsupp.linearEquivFunOnFinite R R ι).symm.trans v.repr.symm ≪≫ₗ v'.repr ≪≫ₗ
Finsupp.linearEquivFunOnFinite R R ι'
· -- `v` is an infinite basis,
-- so by `infinite_basis_le_maximal_linearIndependent`, `v'` is at least as big,
-- and then applying `infinite_basis_le_maximal_linearIndependent` again
-- we see they have the same cardinality.
have w₁ := infinite_basis_le_maximal_linearIndependent' v _ v'.linearIndependent v'.maximal
rcases Cardinal.lift_mk_le'.mp w₁ with ⟨f⟩
haveI : Infinite ι' := Infinite.of_injective f f.2
have w₂ := infinite_basis_le_maximal_linearIndependent' v' _ v.linearIndependent v.maximal
exact le_antisymm w₁ w₂
/-- Given two bases indexed by `ι` and `ι'` of an `R`-module, where `R` satisfies the invariant
basis number property, an equiv `ι ≃ ι'`. -/
def Basis.indexEquiv (v : Basis ι R M) (v' : Basis ι' R M) : ι ≃ ι' :=
(Cardinal.lift_mk_eq'.1 <| mk_eq_mk_of_basis v v').some
theorem mk_eq_mk_of_basis' {ι' : Type w} (v : Basis ι R M) (v' : Basis ι' R M) : #ι = #ι' :=
Cardinal.lift_inj.1 <| mk_eq_mk_of_basis v v'
end InvariantBasisNumber
section RankCondition
variable [RankCondition R]
/-- An auxiliary lemma for `Basis.le_span`.
If `R` satisfies the rank condition,
then for any finite basis `b : Basis ι R M`,
and any finite spanning set `w : Set M`,
the cardinality of `ι` is bounded by the cardinality of `w`.
-/
theorem Basis.le_span'' {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (b : Basis ι R M) {w : Set M} [Fintype w]
(s : span R w = ⊤) : Fintype.card ι ≤ Fintype.card w := by
-- We construct a surjective linear map `(w → R) →ₗ[R] (ι → R)`,
-- by expressing a linear combination in `w` as a linear combination in `ι`.
fapply card_le_of_surjective' R
· exact b.repr.toLinearMap.comp (Finsupp.linearCombination R (↑))
· apply Surjective.comp (g := b.repr.toLinearMap)
· apply LinearEquiv.surjective
rw [← LinearMap.range_eq_top, Finsupp.range_linearCombination]
simpa using s
/--
Another auxiliary lemma for `Basis.le_span`, which does not require assuming the basis is finite,
but still assumes we have a finite spanning set.
| -/
theorem basis_le_span' {ι : Type*} (b : Basis ι R M) {w : Set M} [Fintype w] (s : span R w = ⊤) :
#ι ≤ Fintype.card w := by
haveI := nontrivial_of_invariantBasisNumber R
haveI := basis_finite_of_finite_spans w.toFinite s b
cases nonempty_fintype ι
rw [Cardinal.mk_fintype ι]
simp only [Nat.cast_le]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Dimension/StrongRankCondition.lean | 125 | 132 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Derivation.Killing
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Killing
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Sl2
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Weights.Chain
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Eigenspace.Semisimple
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.JordanChevalley
/-!
# Roots of Lie algebras with non-degenerate Killing forms
The file contains definitions and results about roots of Lie algebras with non-degenerate Killing
forms.
## Main definitions
* `LieAlgebra.IsKilling.ker_restrict_eq_bot_of_isCartanSubalgebra`: if the Killing form of
a Lie algebra is non-singular, it remains non-singular when restricted to a Cartan subalgebra.
* `LieAlgebra.IsKilling.instIsLieAbelianOfIsCartanSubalgebra`: if the Killing form of a Lie
algebra is non-singular, then its Cartan subalgebras are Abelian.
* `LieAlgebra.IsKilling.isSemisimple_ad_of_mem_isCartanSubalgebra`: over a perfect field, if a Lie
algebra has non-degenerate Killing form, Cartan subalgebras contain only semisimple elements.
* `LieAlgebra.IsKilling.span_weight_eq_top`: given a splitting Cartan subalgebra `H` of a
finite-dimensional Lie algebra with non-singular Killing form, the corresponding roots span the
dual space of `H`.
* `LieAlgebra.IsKilling.coroot`: the coroot corresponding to a root.
* `LieAlgebra.IsKilling.isCompl_ker_weight_span_coroot`: given a root `α` with respect to a Cartan
subalgebra `H`, we have a natural decomposition of `H` as the kernel of `α` and the span of the
coroot corresponding to `α`.
* `LieAlgebra.IsKilling.finrank_rootSpace_eq_one`: root spaces are one-dimensional.
-/
variable (R K L : Type*) [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R L] [Field K] [LieAlgebra K L]
namespace LieAlgebra
lemma restrict_killingForm (H : LieSubalgebra R L) :
(killingForm R L).restrict H = LieModule.traceForm R H L :=
rfl
namespace IsKilling
variable [IsKilling R L]
/-- If the Killing form of a Lie algebra is non-singular, it remains non-singular when restricted
to a Cartan subalgebra. -/
lemma ker_restrict_eq_bot_of_isCartanSubalgebra
[IsNoetherian R L] [IsArtinian R L] (H : LieSubalgebra R L) [H.IsCartanSubalgebra] :
LinearMap.ker ((killingForm R L).restrict H) = ⊥ := by
have h : Codisjoint (rootSpace H 0) (LieModule.posFittingComp R H L) :=
(LieModule.isCompl_genWeightSpace_zero_posFittingComp R H L).codisjoint
replace h : Codisjoint (H : Submodule R L) (LieModule.posFittingComp R H L : Submodule R L) := by
rwa [codisjoint_iff, ← LieSubmodule.toSubmodule_inj, LieSubmodule.sup_toSubmodule,
LieSubmodule.top_toSubmodule, rootSpace_zero_eq R L H, LieSubalgebra.coe_toLieSubmodule,
← codisjoint_iff] at h
suffices this : ∀ m₀ ∈ H, ∀ m₁ ∈ LieModule.posFittingComp R H L, killingForm R L m₀ m₁ = 0 by
simp [LinearMap.BilinForm.ker_restrict_eq_of_codisjoint h this]
intro m₀ h₀ m₁ h₁
exact killingForm_eq_zero_of_mem_zeroRoot_mem_posFitting R L H (le_zeroRootSubalgebra R L H h₀) h₁
@[simp] lemma ker_traceForm_eq_bot_of_isCartanSubalgebra
[IsNoetherian R L] [IsArtinian R L] (H : LieSubalgebra R L) [H.IsCartanSubalgebra] :
LinearMap.ker (LieModule.traceForm R H L) = ⊥ :=
ker_restrict_eq_bot_of_isCartanSubalgebra R L H
lemma traceForm_cartan_nondegenerate
[IsNoetherian R L] [IsArtinian R L] (H : LieSubalgebra R L) [H.IsCartanSubalgebra] :
(LieModule.traceForm R H L).Nondegenerate := by
simp [LinearMap.BilinForm.nondegenerate_iff_ker_eq_bot]
variable [Module.Free R L] [Module.Finite R L]
instance instIsLieAbelianOfIsCartanSubalgebra
[IsDomain R] [IsPrincipalIdealRing R] [IsArtinian R L]
(H : LieSubalgebra R L) [H.IsCartanSubalgebra] :
IsLieAbelian H :=
LieModule.isLieAbelian_of_ker_traceForm_eq_bot R H L <|
ker_restrict_eq_bot_of_isCartanSubalgebra R L H
end IsKilling
section Field
open Module LieModule Set
open Submodule (span subset_span)
variable [FiniteDimensional K L] (H : LieSubalgebra K L) [H.IsCartanSubalgebra]
section
variable [IsTriangularizable K H L]
/-- For any `α` and `β`, the corresponding root spaces are orthogonal with respect to the Killing
form, provided `α + β ≠ 0`. -/
lemma killingForm_apply_eq_zero_of_mem_rootSpace_of_add_ne_zero {α β : H → K} {x y : L}
(hx : x ∈ rootSpace H α) (hy : y ∈ rootSpace H β) (hαβ : α + β ≠ 0) :
killingForm K L x y = 0 := by
/- If `ad R L z` is semisimple for all `z ∈ H` then writing `⟪x, y⟫ = killingForm K L x y`, there
is a slick proof of this lemma that requires only invariance of the Killing form as follows.
For any `z ∈ H`, we have:
`α z • ⟪x, y⟫ = ⟪α z • x, y⟫ = ⟪⁅z, x⁆, y⟫ = - ⟪x, ⁅z, y⁆⟫ = - ⟪x, β z • y⟫ = - β z • ⟪x, y⟫`.
Since this is true for any `z`, we thus have: `(α + β) • ⟪x, y⟫ = 0`, and hence the result.
However the semisimplicity of `ad R L z` is (a) non-trivial and (b) requires the assumption
that `K` is a perfect field and `L` has non-degenerate Killing form. -/
let σ : (H → K) → (H → K) := fun γ ↦ α + (β + γ)
have hσ : ∀ γ, σ γ ≠ γ := fun γ ↦ by simpa only [σ, ← add_assoc] using add_ne_right.mpr hαβ
let f : Module.End K L := (ad K L x) ∘ₗ (ad K L y)
have hf : ∀ γ, MapsTo f (rootSpace H γ) (rootSpace H (σ γ)) := fun γ ↦
(mapsTo_toEnd_genWeightSpace_add_of_mem_rootSpace K L H L α (β + γ) hx).comp <|
mapsTo_toEnd_genWeightSpace_add_of_mem_rootSpace K L H L β γ hy
classical
have hds := DirectSum.isInternal_submodule_of_iSupIndep_of_iSup_eq_top
(LieSubmodule.iSupIndep_toSubmodule.mpr <| iSupIndep_genWeightSpace K H L)
(LieSubmodule.iSup_toSubmodule_eq_top.mpr <| iSup_genWeightSpace_eq_top K H L)
exact LinearMap.trace_eq_zero_of_mapsTo_ne hds σ hσ hf
/-- Elements of the `α` root space which are Killing-orthogonal to the `-α` root space are
Killing-orthogonal to all of `L`. -/
lemma mem_ker_killingForm_of_mem_rootSpace_of_forall_rootSpace_neg
{α : H → K} {x : L} (hx : x ∈ rootSpace H α)
(hx' : ∀ y ∈ rootSpace H (-α), killingForm K L x y = 0) :
x ∈ LinearMap.ker (killingForm K L) := by
rw [LinearMap.mem_ker]
ext y
have hy : y ∈ ⨆ β, rootSpace H β := by simp [iSup_genWeightSpace_eq_top K H L]
induction hy using LieSubmodule.iSup_induction' with
| mem β y hy =>
by_cases hαβ : α + β = 0
· exact hx' _ (add_eq_zero_iff_neg_eq.mp hαβ ▸ hy)
· exact killingForm_apply_eq_zero_of_mem_rootSpace_of_add_ne_zero K L H hx hy hαβ
| zero => simp
| add => simp_all
end
namespace IsKilling
variable [IsKilling K L]
/-- If a Lie algebra `L` has non-degenerate Killing form, the only element of a Cartan subalgebra
whose adjoint action on `L` is nilpotent, is the zero element.
Over a perfect field a much stronger result is true, see
`LieAlgebra.IsKilling.isSemisimple_ad_of_mem_isCartanSubalgebra`. -/
lemma eq_zero_of_isNilpotent_ad_of_mem_isCartanSubalgebra {x : L} (hx : x ∈ H)
(hx' : _root_.IsNilpotent (ad K L x)) : x = 0 := by
suffices ⟨x, hx⟩ ∈ LinearMap.ker (traceForm K H L) by
simp at this
exact (AddSubmonoid.mk_eq_zero H.toAddSubmonoid).mp this
simp only [LinearMap.mem_ker]
ext y
have comm : Commute (toEnd K H L ⟨x, hx⟩) (toEnd K H L y) := by
rw [commute_iff_lie_eq, ← LieHom.map_lie, trivial_lie_zero, LieHom.map_zero]
rw [traceForm_apply_apply, ← Module.End.mul_eq_comp, LinearMap.zero_apply]
exact (LinearMap.isNilpotent_trace_of_isNilpotent (comm.isNilpotent_mul_left hx')).eq_zero
@[simp]
lemma corootSpace_zero_eq_bot :
corootSpace (0 : H → K) = ⊥ := by
refine eq_bot_iff.mpr fun x hx ↦ ?_
suffices {x | ∃ y ∈ H, ∃ z ∈ H, ⁅y, z⁆ = x} = {0} by simpa [mem_corootSpace, this] using hx
refine eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem.mpr ⟨⟨0, H.zero_mem, 0, H.zero_mem, zero_lie 0⟩, ?_⟩
rintro - ⟨y, hy, z, hz, rfl⟩
suffices ⁅(⟨y, hy⟩ : H), (⟨z, hz⟩ : H)⁆ = 0 by
simpa only [Subtype.ext_iff, LieSubalgebra.coe_bracket, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero] using this
simp
variable {K L} in
/-- The restriction of the Killing form to a Cartan subalgebra, as a linear equivalence to the
dual. -/
@[simps! apply_apply]
noncomputable def cartanEquivDual :
H ≃ₗ[K] Module.Dual K H :=
(traceForm K H L).toDual <| traceForm_cartan_nondegenerate K L H
variable {K L H}
/-- The coroot corresponding to a root. -/
noncomputable def coroot (α : Weight K H L) : H :=
2 • (α <| (cartanEquivDual H).symm α)⁻¹ • (cartanEquivDual H).symm α
lemma traceForm_coroot (α : Weight K H L) (x : H) :
traceForm K H L (coroot α) x = 2 • (α <| (cartanEquivDual H).symm α)⁻¹ • α x := by
have : cartanEquivDual H ((cartanEquivDual H).symm α) x = α x := by
rw [LinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply, Weight.toLinear_apply]
rw [coroot, map_nsmul, map_smul, LinearMap.smul_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply]
congr 2
variable [IsTriangularizable K H L]
lemma lie_eq_killingForm_smul_of_mem_rootSpace_of_mem_rootSpace_neg_aux
{α : Weight K H L} {e f : L} (heα : e ∈ rootSpace H α) (hfα : f ∈ rootSpace H (-α))
(aux : ∀ (h : H), ⁅h, e⁆ = α h • e) :
⁅e, f⁆ = killingForm K L e f • (cartanEquivDual H).symm α := by
set α' := (cartanEquivDual H).symm α
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← Submodule.mem_bot (R := K), ← ker_killingForm_eq_bot]
apply mem_ker_killingForm_of_mem_rootSpace_of_forall_rootSpace_neg (α := (0 : H → K))
· simp only [rootSpace_zero_eq, LieSubalgebra.mem_toLieSubmodule]
refine sub_mem ?_ (H.smul_mem _ α'.property)
simpa using mapsTo_toEnd_genWeightSpace_add_of_mem_rootSpace K L H L α (-α) heα hfα
· intro z hz
replace hz : z ∈ H := by simpa using hz
have he : ⁅z, e⁆ = α ⟨z, hz⟩ • e := aux ⟨z, hz⟩
have hαz : killingForm K L α' (⟨z, hz⟩ : H) = α ⟨z, hz⟩ :=
LinearMap.BilinForm.apply_toDual_symm_apply (hB := traceForm_cartan_nondegenerate K L H) _ _
simp [traceForm_comm K L L ⁅e, f⁆, ← traceForm_apply_lie_apply, he, mul_comm _ (α ⟨z, hz⟩), hαz]
/-- This is Proposition 4.18 from [carter2005] except that we use
`LieModule.exists_forall_lie_eq_smul` instead of Lie's theorem (and so avoid
assuming `K` has characteristic zero). -/
lemma cartanEquivDual_symm_apply_mem_corootSpace (α : Weight K H L) :
(cartanEquivDual H).symm α ∈ corootSpace α := by
obtain ⟨e : L, he₀ : e ≠ 0, he : ∀ x, ⁅x, e⁆ = α x • e⟩ := exists_forall_lie_eq_smul K H L α
have heα : e ∈ rootSpace H α := (mem_genWeightSpace L α e).mpr fun x ↦ ⟨1, by simp [← he x]⟩
obtain ⟨f, hfα, hf⟩ : ∃ f ∈ rootSpace H (-α), killingForm K L e f ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! he₀
simpa using mem_ker_killingForm_of_mem_rootSpace_of_forall_rootSpace_neg K L H heα he₀
suffices ⁅e, f⁆ = killingForm K L e f • ((cartanEquivDual H).symm α : L) from
(mem_corootSpace α).mpr <| Submodule.subset_span ⟨(killingForm K L e f)⁻¹ • e,
Submodule.smul_mem _ _ heα, f, hfα, by simpa [inv_smul_eq_iff₀ hf]⟩
exact lie_eq_killingForm_smul_of_mem_rootSpace_of_mem_rootSpace_neg_aux heα hfα he
/-- Given a splitting Cartan subalgebra `H` of a finite-dimensional Lie algebra with non-singular
Killing form, the corresponding roots span the dual space of `H`. -/
@[simp]
lemma span_weight_eq_top :
span K (range (Weight.toLinear K H L)) = ⊤ := by
refine eq_top_iff.mpr (le_trans ?_ (LieModule.range_traceForm_le_span_weight K H L))
rw [← traceForm_flip K H L, ← LinearMap.dualAnnihilator_ker_eq_range_flip,
ker_traceForm_eq_bot_of_isCartanSubalgebra, Submodule.dualAnnihilator_bot]
variable (K L H) in
@[simp]
lemma span_weight_isNonZero_eq_top :
span K ({α : Weight K H L | α.IsNonZero}.image (Weight.toLinear K H L)) = ⊤ := by
rw [← span_weight_eq_top]
refine le_antisymm (Submodule.span_mono <| by simp) ?_
suffices range (Weight.toLinear K H L) ⊆
insert 0 ({α : Weight K H L | α.IsNonZero}.image (Weight.toLinear K H L)) by
simpa only [Submodule.span_insert_zero] using Submodule.span_mono this
rintro - ⟨α, rfl⟩
simp only [mem_insert_iff, Weight.coe_toLinear_eq_zero_iff, mem_image, mem_setOf_eq]
tauto
@[simp]
lemma iInf_ker_weight_eq_bot :
⨅ α : Weight K H L, α.ker = ⊥ := by
rw [← Subspace.dualAnnihilator_inj, Subspace.dualAnnihilator_iInf_eq,
Submodule.dualAnnihilator_bot]
simp [← LinearMap.range_dualMap_eq_dualAnnihilator_ker, ← Submodule.span_range_eq_iSup]
section PerfectField
variable [PerfectField K]
open Module.End in
lemma isSemisimple_ad_of_mem_isCartanSubalgebra {x : L} (hx : x ∈ H) :
(ad K L x).IsSemisimple := by
/- Using Jordan-Chevalley, write `ad K L x` as a sum of its semisimple and nilpotent parts. -/
obtain ⟨N, -, S, hS₀, hN, hS, hSN⟩ := (ad K L x).exists_isNilpotent_isSemisimple
replace hS₀ : Commute (ad K L x) S := Algebra.commute_of_mem_adjoin_self hS₀
set x' : H := ⟨x, hx⟩
rw [eq_sub_of_add_eq hSN.symm] at hN
/- Note that the semisimple part `S` is just a scalar action on each root space. -/
have aux {α : H → K} {y : L} (hy : y ∈ rootSpace H α) : S y = α x' • y := by
replace hy : y ∈ (ad K L x).maxGenEigenspace (α x') :=
(genWeightSpace_le_genWeightSpaceOf L x' α) hy
rw [maxGenEigenspace_eq] at hy
set k := maxGenEigenspaceIndex (ad K L x) (α x')
rw [apply_eq_of_mem_of_comm_of_isFinitelySemisimple_of_isNil hy hS₀ hS.isFinitelySemisimple hN]
/- So `S` obeys the derivation axiom if we restrict to root spaces. -/
have h_der (y z : L) (α β : H → K) (hy : y ∈ rootSpace H α) (hz : z ∈ rootSpace H β) :
S ⁅y, z⁆ = ⁅S y, z⁆ + ⁅y, S z⁆ := by
have hyz : ⁅y, z⁆ ∈ rootSpace H (α + β) :=
mapsTo_toEnd_genWeightSpace_add_of_mem_rootSpace K L H L α β hy hz
rw [aux hy, aux hz, aux hyz, smul_lie, lie_smul, ← add_smul, ← Pi.add_apply]
/- Thus `S` is a derivation since root spaces span. -/
replace h_der (y z : L) : S ⁅y, z⁆ = ⁅S y, z⁆ + ⁅y, S z⁆ := by
have hy : y ∈ ⨆ α : H → K, rootSpace H α := by simp [iSup_genWeightSpace_eq_top]
have hz : z ∈ ⨆ α : H → K, rootSpace H α := by simp [iSup_genWeightSpace_eq_top]
induction hy using LieSubmodule.iSup_induction' with
| mem α y hy =>
induction hz using LieSubmodule.iSup_induction' with
| mem β z hz => exact h_der y z α β hy hz
| zero => simp
| add _ _ _ _ h h' => simp only [lie_add, map_add, h, h']; abel
| zero => simp
| add _ _ _ _ h h' => simp only [add_lie, map_add, h, h']; abel
/- An equivalent form of the derivation axiom used in `LieDerivation`. -/
replace h_der : ∀ y z : L, S ⁅y, z⁆ = ⁅y, S z⁆ - ⁅z, S y⁆ := by
simp_rw [← lie_skew (S _) _, add_comm, ← sub_eq_add_neg] at h_der; assumption
/- Bundle `S` as a `LieDerivation`. -/
let S' : LieDerivation K L L := ⟨S, h_der⟩
/- Since `L` has non-degenerate Killing form, `S` must be inner, corresponding to some `y : L`. -/
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := LieDerivation.IsKilling.exists_eq_ad S'
/- `y` commutes with all elements of `H` because `S` has eigenvalue 0 on `H`, `S = ad K L y`. -/
have hy' (z : L) (hz : z ∈ H) : ⁅y, z⁆ = 0 := by
rw [← LieSubalgebra.mem_toLieSubmodule, ← rootSpace_zero_eq] at hz
simp [S', ← ad_apply (R := K), ← LieDerivation.coe_ad_apply_eq_ad_apply, hy, aux hz]
/- Thus `y` belongs to `H` since `H` is self-normalizing. -/
replace hy' : y ∈ H := by
suffices y ∈ H.normalizer by rwa [LieSubalgebra.IsCartanSubalgebra.self_normalizing] at this
exact (H.mem_normalizer_iff y).mpr fun z hz ↦ hy' z hz ▸ LieSubalgebra.zero_mem H
/- It suffices to show `x = y` since `S = ad K L y` is semisimple. -/
suffices x = y by rwa [this, ← LieDerivation.coe_ad_apply_eq_ad_apply y, hy]
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
/- This will follow if we can show that `ad K L (x - y)` is nilpotent. -/
apply eq_zero_of_isNilpotent_ad_of_mem_isCartanSubalgebra K L H (H.sub_mem hx hy')
/- Which is true because `ad K L (x - y) = N`. -/
replace hy : S = ad K L y := by rw [← LieDerivation.coe_ad_apply_eq_ad_apply y, hy]
rwa [LieHom.map_sub, hSN, hy, add_sub_cancel_right, eq_sub_of_add_eq hSN.symm]
lemma lie_eq_smul_of_mem_rootSpace {α : H → K} {x : L} (hx : x ∈ rootSpace H α) (h : H) :
⁅h, x⁆ = α h • x := by
replace hx : x ∈ (ad K L h).maxGenEigenspace (α h) :=
genWeightSpace_le_genWeightSpaceOf L h α hx
rw [(isSemisimple_ad_of_mem_isCartanSubalgebra
h.property).isFinitelySemisimple.maxGenEigenspace_eq_eigenspace,
Module.End.mem_eigenspace_iff] at hx
simpa using hx
lemma lie_eq_killingForm_smul_of_mem_rootSpace_of_mem_rootSpace_neg
{α : Weight K H L} {e f : L} (heα : e ∈ rootSpace H α) (hfα : f ∈ rootSpace H (-α)) :
⁅e, f⁆ = killingForm K L e f • (cartanEquivDual H).symm α := by
apply lie_eq_killingForm_smul_of_mem_rootSpace_of_mem_rootSpace_neg_aux heα hfα
exact lie_eq_smul_of_mem_rootSpace heα
lemma coe_corootSpace_eq_span_singleton' (α : Weight K H L) :
(corootSpace α).toSubmodule = K ∙ (cartanEquivDual H).symm α := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· intro ⟨x, hx⟩ hx'
have : {⁅y, z⁆ | (y ∈ rootSpace H α) (z ∈ rootSpace H (-α))} ⊆
K ∙ ((cartanEquivDual H).symm α : L) := by
rintro - ⟨e, heα, f, hfα, rfl⟩
rw [lie_eq_killingForm_smul_of_mem_rootSpace_of_mem_rootSpace_neg heα hfα, SetLike.mem_coe,
Submodule.mem_span_singleton]
exact ⟨killingForm K L e f, rfl⟩
simp only [LieSubmodule.mem_toSubmodule, mem_corootSpace] at hx'
replace this := Submodule.span_mono this hx'
rw [Submodule.span_span] at this
rw [Submodule.mem_span_singleton] at this ⊢
obtain ⟨t, rfl⟩ := this
use t
simp only [Subtype.ext_iff]
rw [Submodule.coe_smul_of_tower]
· simp only [Submodule.span_singleton_le_iff_mem, LieSubmodule.mem_toSubmodule]
exact cartanEquivDual_symm_apply_mem_corootSpace α
end PerfectField
section CharZero
variable [CharZero K]
/-- The contrapositive of this result is very useful, taking `x` to be the element of `H`
corresponding to a root `α` under the identification between `H` and `H^*` provided by the Killing
form. -/
lemma eq_zero_of_apply_eq_zero_of_mem_corootSpace
(x : H) (α : H → K) (hαx : α x = 0) (hx : x ∈ corootSpace α) :
x = 0 := by
rcases eq_or_ne α 0 with rfl | hα; · simpa using hx
replace hx : x ∈ ⨅ β : Weight K H L, β.ker := by
refine (Submodule.mem_iInf _).mpr fun β ↦ ?_
obtain ⟨a, b, hb, hab⟩ :=
exists_forall_mem_corootSpace_smul_add_eq_zero L α β hα β.genWeightSpace_ne_bot
simpa [hαx, hb.ne'] using hab _ hx
simpa using hx
lemma disjoint_ker_weight_corootSpace (α : Weight K H L) :
Disjoint α.ker (corootSpace α) := by
rw [disjoint_iff]
refine (Submodule.eq_bot_iff _).mpr fun x ⟨hαx, hx⟩ ↦ ?_
replace hαx : α x = 0 := by simpa using hαx
exact eq_zero_of_apply_eq_zero_of_mem_corootSpace x α hαx hx
lemma root_apply_cartanEquivDual_symm_ne_zero {α : Weight K H L} (hα : α.IsNonZero) :
α ((cartanEquivDual H).symm α) ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! hα
suffices (cartanEquivDual H).symm α ∈ α.ker ⊓ corootSpace α by
rw [(disjoint_ker_weight_corootSpace α).eq_bot] at this
simpa using this
exact Submodule.mem_inf.mp ⟨hα, cartanEquivDual_symm_apply_mem_corootSpace α⟩
lemma root_apply_coroot {α : Weight K H L} (hα : α.IsNonZero) :
α (coroot α) = 2 := by
rw [← Weight.coe_coe]
simpa [coroot] using inv_mul_cancel₀ (root_apply_cartanEquivDual_symm_ne_zero hα)
@[simp] lemma coroot_eq_zero_iff {α : Weight K H L} :
coroot α = 0 ↔ α.IsZero := by
refine ⟨fun hα ↦ ?_, fun hα ↦ ?_⟩
· by_contra contra
simpa [hα, ← α.coe_coe, map_zero] using root_apply_coroot contra
· simp [coroot, Weight.coe_toLinear_eq_zero_iff.mpr hα]
@[simp]
lemma coroot_zero [Nontrivial L] : coroot (0 : Weight K H L) = 0 := by simp [Weight.isZero_zero]
lemma coe_corootSpace_eq_span_singleton (α : Weight K H L) :
| (corootSpace α).toSubmodule = K ∙ coroot α := by
if hα : α.IsZero then
simp [hα.eq, coroot_eq_zero_iff.mpr hα]
else
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/Weights/Killing.lean | 402 | 405 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Cover
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Defs
/-!
# Intervals as finsets
This file provides basic results about all the `Finset.Ixx`, which are defined in
`Order.Interval.Finset.Defs`.
In addition, it shows that in a locally finite order `≤` and `<` are the transitive closures of,
respectively, `⩿` and `⋖`, which then leads to a characterization of monotone and strictly
functions whose domain is a locally finite order. In particular, this file proves:
* `le_iff_transGen_wcovBy`: `≤` is the transitive closure of `⩿`
* `lt_iff_transGen_covBy`: `<` is the transitive closure of `⋖`
* `monotone_iff_forall_wcovBy`: Characterization of monotone functions
* `strictMono_iff_forall_covBy`: Characterization of strictly monotone functions
## TODO
This file was originally only about `Finset.Ico a b` where `a b : ℕ`. No care has yet been taken to
generalize these lemmas properly and many lemmas about `Icc`, `Ioc`, `Ioo` are missing. In general,
what's to do is taking the lemmas in `Data.X.Intervals` and abstract away the concrete structure.
Complete the API. See
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib/pull/14448#discussion_r906109235
for some ideas.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero Finset.sum
open Function OrderDual
open FinsetInterval
variable {ι α : Type*} {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c x : α}
namespace Finset
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Icc : (Icc a b).Nonempty ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Icc, Set.nonempty_Icc]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Icc_of_le⟩ := nonempty_Icc
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ico : (Ico a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ico, Set.nonempty_Ico]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ico_of_lt⟩ := nonempty_Ico
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioc : (Ioc a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ioc, Set.nonempty_Ioc]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ioc_of_lt⟩ := nonempty_Ioc
-- TODO: This is nonsense. A locally finite order is never densely ordered
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioo [DenselyOrdered α] : (Ioo a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ioo, Set.nonempty_Ioo]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_iff : Icc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a ≤ b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_iff : Ico a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ico, Set.Ico_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_iff : Ioc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioc, Set.Ioc_eq_empty_iff]
-- TODO: This is nonsense. A locally finite order is never densely ordered
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_iff [DenselyOrdered α] : Ioo a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioo, Set.Ioo_eq_empty_iff]
alias ⟨_, Icc_eq_empty⟩ := Icc_eq_empty_iff
alias ⟨_, Ico_eq_empty⟩ := Ico_eq_empty_iff
alias ⟨_, Ioc_eq_empty⟩ := Ioc_eq_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ hx => h ((mem_Ioo.1 hx).1.trans (mem_Ioo.1 hx).2)
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_of_lt (h : b < a) : Icc a b = ∅ :=
Icc_eq_empty h.not_le
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ico a b = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioc a b = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty h.not_lt
theorem left_mem_Icc : a ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp only [mem_Icc, true_and, le_rfl]
theorem left_mem_Ico : a ∈ Ico a b ↔ a < b := by simp only [mem_Ico, true_and, le_refl]
theorem right_mem_Icc : b ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp only [mem_Icc, and_true, le_rfl]
theorem right_mem_Ioc : b ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < b := by simp only [mem_Ioc, and_true, le_rfl]
theorem left_not_mem_Ioc : a ∉ Ioc a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioc.1 h).1
theorem left_not_mem_Ioo : a ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioo.1 h).1
theorem right_not_mem_Ico : b ∉ Ico a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ico.1 h).2
theorem right_not_mem_Ioo : b ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioo.1 h).2
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Icc ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Ico ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Ioc ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Ioo ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Icc a₂ b ⊆ Icc a₁ b :=
Icc_subset_Icc h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ico a₁ b :=
Ico_subset_Ico h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioc a₂ b ⊆ Ioc a₁ b :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioo a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Icc a b₂ :=
Icc_subset_Icc le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ :=
Ico_subset_Ico le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioc a b₂ :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo le_rfl h
theorem Ico_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ < a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ico, coe_Ioo]
exact Set.Ico_subset_Ioo_left h
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioc, coe_Ioo]
exact Set.Ioc_subset_Ioo_right h
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ico]
exact Set.Icc_subset_Ico_right h
theorem Ioo_subset_Ico_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ico a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioo, coe_Ico]
exact Set.Ioo_subset_Ico_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioo, coe_Ioc]
exact Set.Ioo_subset_Ioc_self
theorem Ico_subset_Icc_self : Ico a b ⊆ Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ico, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Icc_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Ioc_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Icc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Icc a b :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self.trans Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_subset_Icc_iff h₁]
theorem Icc_subset_Ioo_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ioo, Set.Icc_subset_Ioo_iff h₁]
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ico, Set.Icc_subset_Ico_iff h₁]
theorem Icc_subset_Ioc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
(Icc_subset_Ico_iff h₁.dual).trans and_comm
--TODO: `Ico_subset_Ioo_iff`, `Ioc_subset_Ioo_iff`
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_left (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ < a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_ssubset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_left hI ha hb
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_right (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ < b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_ssubset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_right hI ha hb
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_disjoint_Ioc_of_le {d : α} (hbc : b ≤ c) : Disjoint (Ioc a b) (Ioc c d) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ h1 h2 ↦ not_and_of_not_left _
((mem_Ioc.1 h1).2.trans hbc).not_lt (mem_Ioc.1 h2)
variable (a)
theorem Ico_self : Ico a a = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
theorem Ioc_self : Ioc a a = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
theorem Ioo_self : Ioo a a = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
variable {a}
/-- A set with upper and lower bounds in a locally finite order is a fintype -/
def _root_.Set.fintypeOfMemBounds {s : Set α} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (ha : a ∈ lowerBounds s)
(hb : b ∈ upperBounds s) : Fintype s :=
Set.fintypeSubset (Set.Icc a b) fun _ hx => ⟨ha hx, hb hx⟩
section Filter
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_le_left [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hca : c ≤ a) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x < c} = ∅ :=
filter_false_of_mem fun _ hx => (hca.trans (mem_Ico.1 hx).1).not_lt
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_right_le [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hbc : b ≤ c) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x < c} = Ico a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => (mem_Ico.1 hx).2.trans_le hbc
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_le_right [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hcb : c ≤ b) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x < c} = Ico a c := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, and_right_comm]
exact and_iff_left_of_imp fun h => h.2.trans_le hcb
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_le_left {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (c ≤ ·)] (hca : c ≤ a) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | c ≤ x} = Ico a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => hca.trans (mem_Ico.1 hx).1
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_right_le {a b : α} [DecidablePred (b ≤ ·)] :
{x ∈ Ico a b | b ≤ x} = ∅ :=
filter_false_of_mem fun _ hx => (mem_Ico.1 hx).2.not_le
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_left_le {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (c ≤ ·)] (hac : a ≤ c) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | c ≤ x} = Ico c b := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, and_comm, and_left_comm]
exact and_iff_right_of_imp fun h => hac.trans h.1
theorem Icc_filter_lt_of_lt_right {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : b < c) :
{x ∈ Icc a b | x < c} = Icc a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Icc.1 hx).2 h
theorem Ioc_filter_lt_of_lt_right {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : b < c) :
{x ∈ Ioc a b | x < c} = Ioc a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Ioc.1 hx).2 h
theorem Iic_filter_lt_of_lt_right {α} [Preorder α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] {a c : α}
[DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : a < c) : {x ∈ Iic a | x < c} = Iic a :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Iic.1 hx) h
variable (a b) [Fintype α]
theorem filter_lt_lt_eq_Ioo [DecidablePred fun j => a < j ∧ j < b] :
({j | a < j ∧ j < b} : Finset _) = Ioo a b := by ext; simp
theorem filter_lt_le_eq_Ioc [DecidablePred fun j => a < j ∧ j ≤ b] :
({j | a < j ∧ j ≤ b} : Finset _) = Ioc a b := by ext; simp
theorem filter_le_lt_eq_Ico [DecidablePred fun j => a ≤ j ∧ j < b] :
({j | a ≤ j ∧ j < b} : Finset _) = Ico a b := by ext; simp
theorem filter_le_le_eq_Icc [DecidablePred fun j => a ≤ j ∧ j ≤ b] :
({j | a ≤ j ∧ j ≤ b} : Finset _) = Icc a b := by ext; simp
end Filter
end LocallyFiniteOrder
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α]
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_eq_empty : Ioi a = ∅ ↔ IsMax a := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioi, Set.Ioi_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp] alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMax.finsetIoi_eq⟩ := Ioi_eq_empty
@[simp] lemma Ioi_nonempty : (Ioi a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMax a := by simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem Ioi_top [OrderTop α] : Ioi (⊤ : α) = ∅ := Ioi_eq_empty.mpr isMax_top
@[simp]
theorem Ici_bot [OrderBot α] [Fintype α] : Ici (⊥ : α) = univ := by
ext a; simp only [mem_Ici, bot_le, mem_univ]
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
lemma nonempty_Ici : (Ici a).Nonempty := ⟨a, mem_Ici.2 le_rfl⟩
lemma nonempty_Ioi : (Ioi a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMax a := by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ioi_of_not_isMax⟩ := nonempty_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem Ici_subset_Ici : Ici a ⊆ Ici b ↔ b ≤ a := by
simp [← coe_subset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Ici_subset_Ici⟩ := Ici_subset_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Ici_ssubset_Ici : Ici a ⊂ Ici b ↔ b < a := by
simp [← coe_ssubset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Ici_ssubset_Ici⟩ := Ici_ssubset_Ici
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_subset_Ioi (h : a ≤ b) : Ioi b ⊆ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioi_subset_Ioi h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_ssubset_Ioi (h : a < b) : Ioi b ⊂ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_ssubset] using Set.Ioi_ssubset_Ioi h
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
theorem Icc_subset_Ici_self : Icc a b ⊆ Ici a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ico_subset_Ici_self : Ico a b ⊆ Ici a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioi_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioi_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Ioi_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Ici_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Ici a :=
Ioc_subset_Icc_self.trans Icc_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ici_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ici a :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self.trans Ico_subset_Ici_self
end LocallyFiniteOrderTop
section LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
@[simp]
theorem Iio_eq_empty : Iio a = ∅ ↔ IsMin a := Ioi_eq_empty (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp] alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMin.finsetIio_eq⟩ := Iio_eq_empty
@[simp] lemma Iio_nonempty : (Iio a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMin a := by simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem Iio_bot [OrderBot α] : Iio (⊥ : α) = ∅ := Iio_eq_empty.mpr isMin_bot
@[simp]
theorem Iic_top [OrderTop α] [Fintype α] : Iic (⊤ : α) = univ := by
ext a; simp only [mem_Iic, le_top, mem_univ]
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
lemma nonempty_Iic : (Iic a).Nonempty := ⟨a, mem_Iic.2 le_rfl⟩
lemma nonempty_Iio : (Iio a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMin a := by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Iio_of_not_isMin⟩ := nonempty_Iio
@[simp]
theorem Iic_subset_Iic : Iic a ⊆ Iic b ↔ a ≤ b := by
simp [← coe_subset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Iic_subset_Iic⟩ := Iic_subset_Iic
@[simp]
theorem Iic_ssubset_Iic : Iic a ⊂ Iic b ↔ a < b := by
simp [← coe_ssubset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Iic_ssubset_Iic⟩ := Iic_ssubset_Iic
@[gcongr]
theorem Iio_subset_Iio (h : a ≤ b) : Iio a ⊆ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Iio_subset_Iio h
@[gcongr]
theorem Iio_ssubset_Iio (h : a < b) : Iio a ⊂ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_ssubset] using Set.Iio_ssubset_Iio h
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
theorem Icc_subset_Iic_self : Icc a b ⊆ Iic b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Iic_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Iic b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ico_subset_Iio_self : Ico a b ⊆ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Iio_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Iio_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Iio_self
theorem Ico_subset_Iic_self : Ico a b ⊆ Iic b :=
Ico_subset_Icc_self.trans Icc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Iic_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Iic b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioc_self.trans Ioc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Iic_disjoint_Ioc (h : a ≤ b) : Disjoint (Iic a) (Ioc b c) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ hax hbcx ↦ (mem_Iic.1 hax).not_lt <| lt_of_le_of_lt h (mem_Ioc.1 hbcx).1
/-- An equivalence between `Finset.Iic a` and `Set.Iic a`. -/
def _root_.Equiv.IicFinsetSet (a : α) : Iic a ≃ Set.Iic a where
toFun b := ⟨b.1, coe_Iic a ▸ mem_coe.2 b.2⟩
invFun b := ⟨b.1, by rw [← mem_coe, coe_Iic a]; exact b.2⟩
left_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl
right_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl
end LocallyFiniteOrderBot
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] {a : α}
theorem Ioi_subset_Ici_self : Ioi a ⊆ Ici a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioi_subset_Ici_self
theorem _root_.BddBelow.finite {s : Set α} (hs : BddBelow s) : s.Finite :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := hs
(Ici a).finite_toSet.subset fun _ hx => mem_Ici.2 <| ha hx
theorem _root_.Set.Infinite.not_bddBelow {s : Set α} : s.Infinite → ¬BddBelow s :=
mt BddBelow.finite
variable [Fintype α]
theorem filter_lt_eq_Ioi [DecidablePred (a < ·)] : ({x | a < x} : Finset _) = Ioi a := by ext; simp
theorem filter_le_eq_Ici [DecidablePred (a ≤ ·)] : ({x | a ≤ x} : Finset _) = Ici a := by ext; simp
end LocallyFiniteOrderTop
section LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] {a : α}
theorem Iio_subset_Iic_self : Iio a ⊆ Iic a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Iio_subset_Iic_self
theorem _root_.BddAbove.finite {s : Set α} (hs : BddAbove s) : s.Finite :=
hs.dual.finite
theorem _root_.Set.Infinite.not_bddAbove {s : Set α} : s.Infinite → ¬BddAbove s :=
mt BddAbove.finite
variable [Fintype α]
theorem filter_gt_eq_Iio [DecidablePred (· < a)] : ({x | x < a} : Finset _) = Iio a := by ext; simp
theorem filter_ge_eq_Iic [DecidablePred (· ≤ a)] : ({x | x ≤ a} : Finset _) = Iic a := by ext; simp
end LocallyFiniteOrderBot
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_bot [OrderBot α] : Icc (⊥ : α) a = Iic a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem Icc_top [OrderTop α] : Icc a (⊤ : α) = Ici a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem Ico_bot [OrderBot α] : Ico (⊥ : α) a = Iio a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_top [OrderTop α] : Ioc a (⊤ : α) = Ioi a := rfl
theorem Icc_bot_top [BoundedOrder α] [Fintype α] : Icc (⊥ : α) (⊤ : α) = univ := by
rw [Icc_bot, Iic_top]
end LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
theorem disjoint_Ioi_Iio (a : α) : Disjoint (Ioi a) (Iio a) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ hab hba => (mem_Ioi.1 hab).not_lt <| mem_Iio.1 hba
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem Icc_self (a : α) : Icc a a = {a} := by rw [← coe_eq_singleton, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_self]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_singleton_iff : Icc a b = {c} ↔ a = c ∧ b = c := by
rw [← coe_eq_singleton, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_eq_singleton_iff]
theorem Ico_disjoint_Ico_consecutive (a b c : α) : Disjoint (Ico a b) (Ico b c) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ hab hbc => (mem_Ico.mp hab).2.not_le (mem_Ico.mp hbc).1
@[simp]
theorem Ici_top [OrderTop α] : Ici (⊤ : α) = {⊤} := Icc_eq_singleton_iff.2 ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem Iic_bot [OrderBot α] : Iic (⊥ : α) = {⊥} := Icc_eq_singleton_iff.2 ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
section DecidableEq
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_erase_left (a b : α) : (Icc a b).erase a = Ioc a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_erase_right (a b : α) : (Icc a b).erase b = Ico a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_erase_left (a b : α) : (Ico a b).erase a = Ioo a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_erase_right (a b : α) : (Ioc a b).erase b = Ioo a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_both (a b : α) : Icc a b \ {a, b} = Ioo a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_insert_right (h : a ≤ b) : insert b (Ico a b) = Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_Icc, coe_Ico, Set.insert_eq, Set.union_comm, Set.Ico_union_right h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_insert_left (h : a ≤ b) : insert a (Ioc a b) = Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_Ioc, coe_Icc, Set.insert_eq, Set.union_comm, Set.Ioc_union_left h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_insert_left (h : a < b) : insert a (Ioo a b) = Ico a b := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_Ioo, coe_Ico, Set.insert_eq, Set.union_comm, Set.Ioo_union_left h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_insert_right (h : a < b) : insert b (Ioo a b) = Ioc a b := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_Ioo, coe_Ioc, Set.insert_eq, Set.union_comm, Set.Ioo_union_right h]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ico_self (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ico a b = {b} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ioc_self (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ioc a b = {a} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ioo_self (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ioo a b = {a, b} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_diff_Ioo_self (h : a < b) : Ico a b \ Ioo a b = {a} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_diff_Ioo_self (h : a < b) : Ioc a b \ Ioo a b = {b} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_inter_Ico_consecutive (a b c : α) : Ico a b ∩ Ico b c = ∅ :=
(Ico_disjoint_Ico_consecutive a b c).eq_bot
end DecidableEq
-- Those lemmas are purposefully the other way around
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ico_insert_right`. -/
theorem Icc_eq_cons_Ico (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b = (Ico a b).cons b right_not_mem_Ico := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ico_insert_right h]
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ioc_insert_left`. -/
theorem Icc_eq_cons_Ioc (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b = (Ioc a b).cons a left_not_mem_Ioc := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ioc_insert_left h]
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ioo_insert_right`. -/
theorem Ioc_eq_cons_Ioo (h : a < b) : Ioc a b = (Ioo a b).cons b right_not_mem_Ioo := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ioo_insert_right h]
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ioo_insert_left`. -/
theorem Ico_eq_cons_Ioo (h : a < b) : Ico a b = (Ioo a b).cons a left_not_mem_Ioo := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ioo_insert_left h]
theorem Ico_filter_le_left {a b : α} [DecidablePred (· ≤ a)] (hab : a < b) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x ≤ a} = {a} := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_singleton, and_right_comm, ← le_antisymm_iff, eq_comm]
exact and_iff_left_of_imp fun h => h.le.trans_lt hab
theorem card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one (a b : α) : #(Ico a b) = #(Icc a b) - 1 := by
classical
by_cases h : a ≤ b
· rw [Icc_eq_cons_Ico h, card_cons]
exact (Nat.add_sub_cancel _ _).symm
· rw [Ico_eq_empty fun h' => h h'.le, Icc_eq_empty h, card_empty, Nat.zero_sub]
theorem card_Ioc_eq_card_Icc_sub_one (a b : α) : #(Ioc a b) = #(Icc a b) - 1 :=
@card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
theorem card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one (a b : α) : #(Ioo a b) = #(Ico a b) - 1 := by
classical
by_cases h : a < b
· rw [Ico_eq_cons_Ioo h, card_cons]
exact (Nat.add_sub_cancel _ _).symm
· rw [Ioo_eq_empty h, Ico_eq_empty h, card_empty, Nat.zero_sub]
theorem card_Ioo_eq_card_Ioc_sub_one (a b : α) : #(Ioo a b) = #(Ioc a b) - 1 :=
@card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
theorem card_Ioo_eq_card_Icc_sub_two (a b : α) : #(Ioo a b) = #(Icc a b) - 2 := by
rw [card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one, card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one]
rfl
end PartialOrder
section Prod
variable {β : Type*}
section sectL
lemma uIcc_map_sectL [Lattice α] [Lattice β] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder β]
[DecidableLE (α × β)] (a b : α) (c : β) :
(uIcc a b).map (.sectL _ c) = uIcc (a, c) (b, c) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm])
variable [Preorder α] [PartialOrder β] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder β]
[DecidableLE (α × β)] (a b : α) (c : β)
lemma Icc_map_sectL : (Icc a b).map (.sectL _ c) = Icc (a, c) (b, c) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm])
lemma Ioc_map_sectL : (Ioc a b).map (.sectL _ c) = Ioc (a, c) (b, c) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm, le_of_lt])
lemma Ico_map_sectL : (Ico a b).map (.sectL _ c) = Ico (a, c) (b, c) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm, le_of_lt])
lemma Ioo_map_sectL : (Ioo a b).map (.sectL _ c) = Ioo (a, c) (b, c) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm, le_of_lt])
end sectL
section sectR
lemma uIcc_map_sectR [Lattice α] [Lattice β] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder β]
[DecidableLE (α × β)] (c : α) (a b : β) :
(uIcc a b).map (.sectR c _) = uIcc (c, a) (c, b) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm])
variable [PartialOrder α] [Preorder β] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder β]
[DecidableLE (α × β)] (c : α) (a b : β)
lemma Icc_map_sectR : (Icc a b).map (.sectR c _) = Icc (c, a) (c, b) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm])
lemma Ioc_map_sectR : (Ioc a b).map (.sectR c _) = Ioc (c, a) (c, b) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm, le_of_lt])
lemma Ico_map_sectR : (Ico a b).map (.sectR c _) = Ico (c, a) (c, b) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm, le_of_lt])
lemma Ioo_map_sectR : (Ioo a b).map (.sectR c _) = Ioo (c, a) (c, b) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm, le_of_lt])
end sectR
end Prod
section BoundedPartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α]
section OrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α]
@[simp]
theorem Ici_erase [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : (Ici a).erase a = Ioi a := by
ext
simp_rw [Finset.mem_erase, mem_Ici, mem_Ioi, lt_iff_le_and_ne, and_comm, ne_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_insert [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : insert a (Ioi a) = Ici a := by
ext
simp_rw [Finset.mem_insert, mem_Ici, mem_Ioi, le_iff_lt_or_eq, or_comm, eq_comm]
theorem not_mem_Ioi_self {b : α} : b ∉ Ioi b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioi.1 h)
-- Purposefully written the other way around
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ioi_insert`. -/
theorem Ici_eq_cons_Ioi (a : α) : Ici a = (Ioi a).cons a not_mem_Ioi_self := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ioi_insert]
theorem card_Ioi_eq_card_Ici_sub_one (a : α) : #(Ioi a) = #(Ici a) - 1 := by
rw [Ici_eq_cons_Ioi, card_cons, Nat.add_sub_cancel_right]
end OrderTop
section OrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
@[simp]
theorem Iic_erase [DecidableEq α] (b : α) : (Iic b).erase b = Iio b := by
ext
simp_rw [Finset.mem_erase, mem_Iic, mem_Iio, lt_iff_le_and_ne, and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Iio_insert [DecidableEq α] (b : α) : insert b (Iio b) = Iic b := by
ext
simp_rw [Finset.mem_insert, mem_Iic, mem_Iio, le_iff_lt_or_eq, or_comm]
theorem not_mem_Iio_self {b : α} : b ∉ Iio b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Iio.1 h)
-- Purposefully written the other way around
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Iio_insert`. -/
theorem Iic_eq_cons_Iio (b : α) : Iic b = (Iio b).cons b not_mem_Iio_self := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Iio_insert]
theorem card_Iio_eq_card_Iic_sub_one (a : α) : #(Iio a) = #(Iic a) - 1 := by
rw [Iic_eq_cons_Iio, card_cons, Nat.add_sub_cancel_right]
end OrderBot
end BoundedPartialOrder
section SemilatticeSup
variable [SemilatticeSup α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
-- TODO: Why does `id_eq` simplify the LHS here but not the LHS of `Finset.sup_Iic`?
lemma sup'_Iic (a : α) : (Iic a).sup' nonempty_Iic id = a :=
le_antisymm (sup'_le _ _ fun _ ↦ mem_Iic.1) <| le_sup' (f := id) <| mem_Iic.2 <| le_refl a
@[simp] lemma sup_Iic [OrderBot α] (a : α) : (Iic a).sup id = a :=
le_antisymm (Finset.sup_le fun _ ↦ mem_Iic.1) <| le_sup (f := id) <| mem_Iic.2 <| le_refl a
lemma image_subset_Iic_sup [OrderBot α] [DecidableEq α] (f : ι → α) (s : Finset ι) :
s.image f ⊆ Iic (s.sup f) := by
refine fun i hi ↦ mem_Iic.2 ?_
obtain ⟨j, hj, rfl⟩ := mem_image.1 hi
exact le_sup hj
lemma subset_Iic_sup_id [OrderBot α] (s : Finset α) : s ⊆ Iic (s.sup id) :=
fun _ h ↦ mem_Iic.2 <| le_sup (f := id) h
end SemilatticeSup
section SemilatticeInf
variable [SemilatticeInf α] [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α]
lemma inf'_Ici (a : α) : (Ici a).inf' nonempty_Ici id = a :=
ge_antisymm (le_inf' _ _ fun _ ↦ mem_Ici.1) <| inf'_le (f := id) <| mem_Ici.2 <| le_refl a
@[simp] lemma inf_Ici [OrderTop α] (a : α) : (Ici a).inf id = a :=
le_antisymm (inf_le (f := id) <| mem_Ici.2 <| le_refl a) <| Finset.le_inf fun _ ↦ mem_Ici.1
end SemilatticeInf
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α]
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_iff {a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ : α} (h : a₁ < b₁) :
Ico a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ico, coe_Ico, Set.Ico_subset_Ico_iff h]
theorem Ico_union_Ico_eq_Ico {a b c : α} (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) :
Ico a b ∪ Ico b c = Ico a c := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_union, coe_Ico, coe_Ico, coe_Ico, Set.Ico_union_Ico_eq_Ico hab hbc]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_union_Ioc_eq_Ioc {a b c : α} (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : b ≤ c) :
Ioc a b ∪ Ioc b c = Ioc a c := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_union, coe_Ioc, coe_Ioc, coe_Ioc, Set.Ioc_union_Ioc_eq_Ioc h₁ h₂]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_union_Ico {a b c : α} : Ico a c ⊆ Ico a b ∪ Ico b c := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_union, coe_Ico, coe_Ico, coe_Ico]
exact Set.Ico_subset_Ico_union_Ico
theorem Ico_union_Ico' {a b c d : α} (hcb : c ≤ b) (had : a ≤ d) :
Ico a b ∪ Ico c d = Ico (min a c) (max b d) := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_union, coe_Ico, coe_Ico, coe_Ico, Set.Ico_union_Ico' hcb had]
theorem Ico_union_Ico {a b c d : α} (h₁ : min a b ≤ max c d) (h₂ : min c d ≤ max a b) :
Ico a b ∪ Ico c d = Ico (min a c) (max b d) := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_union, coe_Ico, coe_Ico, coe_Ico, Set.Ico_union_Ico h₁ h₂]
theorem Ico_inter_Ico {a b c d : α} : Ico a b ∩ Ico c d = Ico (max a c) (min b d) := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_inter, coe_Ico, coe_Ico, coe_Ico, Set.Ico_inter_Ico]
theorem Ioc_inter_Ioc {a b c d : α} : Ioc a b ∩ Ioc c d = Ioc (max a c) (min b d) := by
rw [← coe_inj]
push_cast
exact Set.Ioc_inter_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem Ico_filter_lt (a b c : α) : {x ∈ Ico a b | x < c} = Ico a (min b c) := by
cases le_total b c with
| inl h => rw [Ico_filter_lt_of_right_le h, min_eq_left h]
| inr h => rw [Ico_filter_lt_of_le_right h, min_eq_right h]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_filter_le (a b c : α) : {x ∈ Ico a b | c ≤ x} = Ico (max a c) b := by
cases le_total a c with
| inl h => rw [Ico_filter_le_of_left_le h, max_eq_right h]
| inr h => rw [Ico_filter_le_of_le_left h, max_eq_left h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_filter_lt (a b c : α) : {x ∈ Ioo a b | x < c} = Ioo a (min b c) := by
ext
simp [and_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem Iio_filter_lt {α} [LinearOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] (a b : α) :
{x ∈ Iio a | x < b} = Iio (min a b) := by
ext
simp [and_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_diff_Ico_left (a b c : α) : Ico a b \ Ico a c = Ico (max a c) b := by
cases le_total a c with
| inl h =>
ext x
rw [mem_sdiff, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, max_eq_right h, and_right_comm, not_and, not_lt]
exact and_congr_left' ⟨fun hx => hx.2 hx.1, fun hx => ⟨h.trans hx, fun _ => hx⟩⟩
| inr h => rw [Ico_eq_empty_of_le h, sdiff_empty, max_eq_left h]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_diff_Ico_right (a b c : α) : Ico a b \ Ico c b = Ico a (min b c) := by
cases le_total b c with
| inl h => rw [Ico_eq_empty_of_le h, sdiff_empty, min_eq_left h]
| inr h =>
ext x
rw [mem_sdiff, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, min_eq_right h, and_assoc, not_and', not_le]
exact and_congr_right' ⟨fun hx => hx.2 hx.1, fun hx => ⟨hx.trans_le h, fun _ => hx⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_disjoint_Ioc : Disjoint (Ioc a₁ a₂) (Ioc b₁ b₂) ↔ min a₂ b₂ ≤ max a₁ b₁ := by
simp_rw [disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty, Ioc_inter_Ioc, Ioc_eq_empty_iff, not_lt]
section LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
theorem Iic_diff_Ioc : Iic b \ Ioc a b = Iic (a ⊓ b) := by
rw [← coe_inj]
push_cast
exact Set.Iic_diff_Ioc
theorem Iic_diff_Ioc_self_of_le (hab : a ≤ b) : Iic b \ Ioc a b = Iic a := by
rw [Iic_diff_Ioc, min_eq_left hab]
theorem Iic_union_Ioc_eq_Iic (h : a ≤ b) : Iic a ∪ Ioc a b = Iic b := by
rw [← coe_inj]
push_cast
exact Set.Iic_union_Ioc_eq_Iic h
end LocallyFiniteOrderBot
end LocallyFiniteOrder
section LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] {s : Set α}
theorem _root_.Set.Infinite.exists_gt (hs : s.Infinite) : ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ s, a < b :=
not_bddAbove_iff.1 hs.not_bddAbove
theorem _root_.Set.infinite_iff_exists_gt [Nonempty α] : s.Infinite ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ s, a < b :=
⟨Set.Infinite.exists_gt, Set.infinite_of_forall_exists_gt⟩
end LocallyFiniteOrderBot
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] {s : Set α}
theorem _root_.Set.Infinite.exists_lt (hs : s.Infinite) : ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ s, b < a :=
not_bddBelow_iff.1 hs.not_bddBelow
theorem _root_.Set.infinite_iff_exists_lt [Nonempty α] : s.Infinite ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ s, b < a :=
⟨Set.Infinite.exists_lt, Set.infinite_of_forall_exists_lt⟩
end LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [Fintype α] [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
theorem Ioi_disjUnion_Iio (a : α) :
(Ioi a).disjUnion (Iio a) (disjoint_Ioi_Iio a) = ({a} : Finset α)ᶜ := by
ext
simp [eq_comm]
end LinearOrder
section Lattice
variable [Lattice α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ x : α}
theorem uIcc_toDual (a b : α) : [[toDual a, toDual b]] = [[a, b]].map toDual.toEmbedding :=
Icc_toDual (a ⊔ b) (a ⊓ b)
@[simp]
theorem uIcc_of_le (h : a ≤ b) : [[a, b]] = Icc a b := by
rw [uIcc, inf_eq_left.2 h, sup_eq_right.2 h]
@[simp]
theorem uIcc_of_ge (h : b ≤ a) : [[a, b]] = Icc b a := by
rw [uIcc, inf_eq_right.2 h, sup_eq_left.2 h]
theorem uIcc_comm (a b : α) : [[a, b]] = [[b, a]] := by
rw [uIcc, uIcc, inf_comm, sup_comm]
theorem uIcc_self : [[a, a]] = {a} := by simp [uIcc]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_uIcc : Finset.Nonempty [[a, b]] :=
nonempty_Icc.2 inf_le_sup
theorem Icc_subset_uIcc : Icc a b ⊆ [[a, b]] :=
Icc_subset_Icc inf_le_left le_sup_right
theorem Icc_subset_uIcc' : Icc b a ⊆ [[a, b]] :=
Icc_subset_Icc inf_le_right le_sup_left
theorem left_mem_uIcc : a ∈ [[a, b]] :=
mem_Icc.2 ⟨inf_le_left, le_sup_left⟩
theorem right_mem_uIcc : b ∈ [[a, b]] :=
mem_Icc.2 ⟨inf_le_right, le_sup_right⟩
theorem mem_uIcc_of_le (ha : a ≤ x) (hb : x ≤ b) : x ∈ [[a, b]] :=
Icc_subset_uIcc <| mem_Icc.2 ⟨ha, hb⟩
theorem mem_uIcc_of_ge (hb : b ≤ x) (ha : x ≤ a) : x ∈ [[a, b]] :=
Icc_subset_uIcc' <| mem_Icc.2 ⟨hb, ha⟩
theorem uIcc_subset_uIcc (h₁ : a₁ ∈ [[a₂, b₂]]) (h₂ : b₁ ∈ [[a₂, b₂]]) :
[[a₁, b₁]] ⊆ [[a₂, b₂]] := by
rw [mem_uIcc] at h₁ h₂
exact Icc_subset_Icc (_root_.le_inf h₁.1 h₂.1) (_root_.sup_le h₁.2 h₂.2)
theorem uIcc_subset_Icc (ha : a₁ ∈ Icc a₂ b₂) (hb : b₁ ∈ Icc a₂ b₂) : [[a₁, b₁]] ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
rw [mem_Icc] at ha hb
exact Icc_subset_Icc (_root_.le_inf ha.1 hb.1) (_root_.sup_le ha.2 hb.2)
theorem uIcc_subset_uIcc_iff_mem : [[a₁, b₁]] ⊆ [[a₂, b₂]] ↔ a₁ ∈ [[a₂, b₂]] ∧ b₁ ∈ [[a₂, b₂]] :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h left_mem_uIcc, h right_mem_uIcc⟩, fun h => uIcc_subset_uIcc h.1 h.2⟩
theorem uIcc_subset_uIcc_iff_le' :
[[a₁, b₁]] ⊆ [[a₂, b₂]] ↔ a₂ ⊓ b₂ ≤ a₁ ⊓ b₁ ∧ a₁ ⊔ b₁ ≤ a₂ ⊔ b₂ :=
Icc_subset_Icc_iff inf_le_sup
theorem uIcc_subset_uIcc_right (h : x ∈ [[a, b]]) : [[x, b]] ⊆ [[a, b]] :=
uIcc_subset_uIcc h right_mem_uIcc
theorem uIcc_subset_uIcc_left (h : x ∈ [[a, b]]) : [[a, x]] ⊆ [[a, b]] :=
uIcc_subset_uIcc left_mem_uIcc h
end Lattice
section DistribLattice
variable [DistribLattice α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {a b c : α}
theorem eq_of_mem_uIcc_of_mem_uIcc : a ∈ [[b, c]] → b ∈ [[a, c]] → a = b := by
simp_rw [mem_uIcc]
exact Set.eq_of_mem_uIcc_of_mem_uIcc
theorem eq_of_mem_uIcc_of_mem_uIcc' : b ∈ [[a, c]] → c ∈ [[a, b]] → b = c := by
simp_rw [mem_uIcc]
exact Set.eq_of_mem_uIcc_of_mem_uIcc'
theorem uIcc_injective_right (a : α) : Injective fun b => [[b, a]] := fun b c h => by
rw [Finset.ext_iff] at h
exact eq_of_mem_uIcc_of_mem_uIcc ((h _).1 left_mem_uIcc) ((h _).2 left_mem_uIcc)
theorem uIcc_injective_left (a : α) : Injective (uIcc a) := by
simpa only [uIcc_comm] using uIcc_injective_right a
end DistribLattice
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c : α}
theorem Icc_min_max : Icc (min a b) (max a b) = [[a, b]] :=
rfl
theorem uIcc_of_not_le (h : ¬a ≤ b) : [[a, b]] = Icc b a :=
uIcc_of_ge <| le_of_not_ge h
theorem uIcc_of_not_ge (h : ¬b ≤ a) : [[a, b]] = Icc a b :=
uIcc_of_le <| le_of_not_ge h
theorem uIcc_eq_union : [[a, b]] = Icc a b ∪ Icc b a :=
coe_injective <| by
push_cast
exact Set.uIcc_eq_union
theorem mem_uIcc' : a ∈ [[b, c]] ↔ b ≤ a ∧ a ≤ c ∨ c ≤ a ∧ a ≤ b := by simp [uIcc_eq_union]
theorem not_mem_uIcc_of_lt : c < a → c < b → c ∉ [[a, b]] := by
rw [mem_uIcc]
exact Set.not_mem_uIcc_of_lt
theorem not_mem_uIcc_of_gt : a < c → b < c → c ∉ [[a, b]] := by
rw [mem_uIcc]
exact Set.not_mem_uIcc_of_gt
theorem uIcc_subset_uIcc_iff_le :
[[a₁, b₁]] ⊆ [[a₂, b₂]] ↔ min a₂ b₂ ≤ min a₁ b₁ ∧ max a₁ b₁ ≤ max a₂ b₂ :=
uIcc_subset_uIcc_iff_le'
/-- A sort of triangle inequality. -/
theorem uIcc_subset_uIcc_union_uIcc : [[a, c]] ⊆ [[a, b]] ∪ [[b, c]] :=
coe_subset.1 <| by
push_cast
exact Set.uIcc_subset_uIcc_union_uIcc
end LinearOrder
end Finset
/-! ### `⩿`, `⋖` and monotonicity -/
section Cover
open Finset Relation
set_option linter.unusedVariables false in -- `have` for wf induction triggers linter
lemma transGen_wcovBy_of_le [Preorder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {x y : α} (hxy : x ≤ y) :
TransGen (· ⩿ ·) x y := by
-- We proceed by well-founded induction on the cardinality of `Icc x y`.
-- It's impossible for the cardinality to be zero since `x ≤ y`
have : #(Ico x y) < #(Icc x y) := card_lt_card <|
⟨Ico_subset_Icc_self, not_subset.mpr ⟨y, ⟨right_mem_Icc.mpr hxy, right_not_mem_Ico⟩⟩⟩
by_cases hxy' : y ≤ x
-- If `y ≤ x`, then `x ⩿ y`
· exact .single <| wcovBy_of_le_of_le hxy hxy'
/- and if `¬ y ≤ x`, then `x < y`, not because it is a linear order, but because `x ≤ y`
already. In that case, since `z` is maximal in `Ico x y`, then `z ⩿ y` and we can use the
induction hypothesis to show that `Relation.TransGen (· ⩿ ·) x z`. -/
· have h_non : (Ico x y).Nonempty := ⟨x, mem_Ico.mpr ⟨le_rfl, lt_of_le_not_le hxy hxy'⟩⟩
obtain ⟨z, z_mem, hz⟩ := (Ico x y).exists_maximal h_non
have z_card := calc
#(Icc x z) ≤ #(Ico x y) := card_le_card <| Icc_subset_Ico_right (mem_Ico.mp z_mem).2
_ < #(Icc x y) := this
have h₁ := transGen_wcovBy_of_le (mem_Ico.mp z_mem).1
have h₂ : z ⩿ y := by
refine ⟨(mem_Ico.mp z_mem).2.le, fun c hzc hcy ↦ hz c ?_ hzc⟩
exact mem_Ico.mpr <| ⟨(mem_Ico.mp z_mem).1.trans hzc.le, hcy⟩
exact .tail h₁ h₂
termination_by #(Icc x y)
/-- In a locally finite preorder, `≤` is the transitive closure of `⩿`. -/
lemma le_iff_transGen_wcovBy [Preorder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {x y : α} :
x ≤ y ↔ TransGen (· ⩿ ·) x y := by
refine ⟨transGen_wcovBy_of_le, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
induction h with
| single h => exact h.le
| tail _ h₁ h₂ => exact h₂.trans h₁.le
/-- In a locally finite partial order, `≤` is the reflexive transitive closure of `⋖`. -/
lemma le_iff_reflTransGen_covBy [PartialOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {x y : α} :
x ≤ y ↔ ReflTransGen (· ⋖ ·) x y := by
rw [le_iff_transGen_wcovBy, wcovBy_eq_reflGen_covBy, transGen_reflGen]
set_option linter.unusedVariables false in -- `have` for wf induction triggers linter
lemma transGen_covBy_of_lt [Preorder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {x y : α} (hxy : x < y) :
TransGen (· ⋖ ·) x y := by
-- We proceed by well-founded induction on the cardinality of `Ico x y`.
-- It's impossible for the cardinality to be zero since `x < y`
have h_non : (Ico x y).Nonempty := ⟨x, mem_Ico.mpr ⟨le_rfl, hxy⟩⟩
-- `Ico x y` is a nonempty finset and so contains a maximal element `z` and
-- `Ico x z` has cardinality strictly less than the cardinality of `Ico x y`
obtain ⟨z, z_mem, hz⟩ := (Ico x y).exists_maximal h_non
have z_card : #(Ico x z) < #(Ico x y) := card_lt_card <| ssubset_iff_of_subset
(Ico_subset_Ico le_rfl (mem_Ico.mp z_mem).2.le) |>.mpr ⟨z, z_mem, right_not_mem_Ico⟩
/- Since `z` is maximal in `Ico x y`, `z ⋖ y`. -/
have hzy : z ⋖ y := by
refine ⟨(mem_Ico.mp z_mem).2, fun c hc hcy ↦ ?_⟩
exact hz _ (mem_Ico.mpr ⟨((mem_Ico.mp z_mem).1.trans_lt hc).le, hcy⟩) hc
by_cases hxz : x < z
/- when `x < z`, then we may use the induction hypothesis to get a chain
`Relation.TransGen (· ⋖ ·) x z`, which we can extend with `Relation.TransGen.tail`. -/
· exact .tail (transGen_covBy_of_lt hxz) hzy
/- when `¬ x < z`, then actually `z ≤ x` (not because it's a linear order, but because
`x ≤ z`), and since `z ⋖ y` we conclude that `x ⋖ y` , then `Relation.TransGen.single`. -/
· simp only [lt_iff_le_not_le, not_and, not_not] at hxz
| exact .single (hzy.of_le_of_lt (hxz (mem_Ico.mp z_mem).1) hxy)
termination_by #(Ico x y)
/-- In a locally finite preorder, `<` is the transitive closure of `⋖`. -/
lemma lt_iff_transGen_covBy [Preorder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {x y : α} :
x < y ↔ TransGen (· ⋖ ·) x y := by
refine ⟨transGen_covBy_of_lt, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Finset/Basic.lean | 1,141 | 1,147 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Alexander Bentkamp. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alexander Bentkamp, Mohanad Ahmed
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Spectrum
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.QuadraticForm.Basic
/-! # Positive Definite Matrices
This file defines positive (semi)definite matrices and connects the notion to positive definiteness
of quadratic forms. Most results require `𝕜 = ℝ` or `ℂ`.
## Main definitions
* `Matrix.PosDef` : a matrix `M : Matrix n n 𝕜` is positive definite if it is hermitian and `xᴴMx`
is greater than zero for all nonzero `x`.
* `Matrix.PosSemidef` : a matrix `M : Matrix n n 𝕜` is positive semidefinite if it is hermitian
and `xᴴMx` is nonnegative for all `x`.
## Main results
* `Matrix.posSemidef_iff_eq_transpose_mul_self` : a matrix `M : Matrix n n 𝕜` is positive
semidefinite iff it has the form `Bᴴ * B` for some `B`.
* `Matrix.PosSemidef.sqrt` : the unique positive semidefinite square root of a positive semidefinite
matrix. (See `Matrix.PosSemidef.eq_sqrt_of_sq_eq` for the proof of uniqueness.)
-/
open scoped ComplexOrder
namespace Matrix
variable {m n R 𝕜 : Type*}
variable [Fintype m] [Fintype n]
variable [CommRing R] [PartialOrder R] [StarRing R]
variable [RCLike 𝕜]
open scoped Matrix
/-!
## Positive semidefinite matrices
-/
/-- A matrix `M : Matrix n n R` is positive semidefinite if it is Hermitian and `xᴴ * M * x` is
nonnegative for all `x`. -/
def PosSemidef (M : Matrix n n R) :=
M.IsHermitian ∧ ∀ x : n → R, 0 ≤ dotProduct (star x) (M *ᵥ x)
protected theorem PosSemidef.diagonal [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n] {d : n → R} (h : 0 ≤ d) :
PosSemidef (diagonal d) :=
⟨isHermitian_diagonal_of_self_adjoint _ <| funext fun i => IsSelfAdjoint.of_nonneg (h i),
fun x => by
refine Fintype.sum_nonneg fun i => ?_
simpa only [mulVec_diagonal, ← mul_assoc] using conjugate_nonneg (h i) _⟩
/-- A diagonal matrix is positive semidefinite iff its diagonal entries are nonnegative. -/
lemma posSemidef_diagonal_iff [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n] {d : n → R} :
PosSemidef (diagonal d) ↔ (∀ i : n, 0 ≤ d i) :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hP⟩ i ↦ by simpa using hP (Pi.single i 1), .diagonal⟩
namespace PosSemidef
theorem isHermitian {M : Matrix n n R} (hM : M.PosSemidef) : M.IsHermitian :=
hM.1
theorem re_dotProduct_nonneg {M : Matrix n n 𝕜} (hM : M.PosSemidef) (x : n → 𝕜) :
0 ≤ RCLike.re (dotProduct (star x) (M *ᵥ x)) :=
RCLike.nonneg_iff.mp (hM.2 _) |>.1
lemma conjTranspose_mul_mul_same {A : Matrix n n R} (hA : PosSemidef A)
{m : Type*} [Fintype m] (B : Matrix n m R) :
PosSemidef (Bᴴ * A * B) := by
constructor
· exact isHermitian_conjTranspose_mul_mul B hA.1
· intro x
simpa only [star_mulVec, dotProduct_mulVec, vecMul_vecMul] using hA.2 (B *ᵥ x)
lemma mul_mul_conjTranspose_same {A : Matrix n n R} (hA : PosSemidef A)
{m : Type*} [Fintype m] (B : Matrix m n R) :
PosSemidef (B * A * Bᴴ) := by
simpa only [conjTranspose_conjTranspose] using hA.conjTranspose_mul_mul_same Bᴴ
theorem submatrix {M : Matrix n n R} (hM : M.PosSemidef) (e : m → n) :
(M.submatrix e e).PosSemidef := by
classical
rw [(by simp : M = 1 * M * 1), submatrix_mul (he₂ := Function.bijective_id),
submatrix_mul (he₂ := Function.bijective_id), submatrix_id_id]
simpa only [conjTranspose_submatrix, conjTranspose_one] using
conjTranspose_mul_mul_same hM (Matrix.submatrix 1 id e)
theorem transpose {M : Matrix n n R} (hM : M.PosSemidef) : Mᵀ.PosSemidef := by
refine ⟨IsHermitian.transpose hM.1, fun x => ?_⟩
convert hM.2 (star x) using 1
rw [mulVec_transpose, dotProduct_mulVec, star_star, dotProduct_comm]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Matrix.posSemidef_transpose_iff {M : Matrix n n R} : Mᵀ.PosSemidef ↔ M.PosSemidef :=
⟨(by simpa using ·.transpose), .transpose⟩
theorem conjTranspose {M : Matrix n n R} (hM : M.PosSemidef) : Mᴴ.PosSemidef := hM.1.symm ▸ hM
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Matrix.posSemidef_conjTranspose_iff {M : Matrix n n R} :
Mᴴ.PosSemidef ↔ M.PosSemidef :=
⟨(by simpa using ·.conjTranspose), .conjTranspose⟩
protected lemma zero : PosSemidef (0 : Matrix n n R) :=
⟨isHermitian_zero, by simp⟩
protected lemma one [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n] : PosSemidef (1 : Matrix n n R) :=
⟨isHermitian_one, fun x => by
rw [one_mulVec]; exact Fintype.sum_nonneg fun i => star_mul_self_nonneg _⟩
protected theorem natCast [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n] (d : ℕ) :
PosSemidef (d : Matrix n n R) :=
⟨isHermitian_natCast _, fun x => by
simp only [natCast_mulVec, dotProduct_smul]
rw [Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul]
exact nsmul_nonneg (dotProduct_star_self_nonneg _) _⟩
protected theorem ofNat [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n] (d : ℕ) [d.AtLeastTwo] :
PosSemidef (ofNat(d) : Matrix n n R) :=
.natCast d
protected theorem intCast [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n] (d : ℤ) (hd : 0 ≤ d) :
PosSemidef (d : Matrix n n R) :=
⟨isHermitian_intCast _, fun x => by
simp only [intCast_mulVec, dotProduct_smul]
rw [Int.cast_smul_eq_zsmul]
exact zsmul_nonneg (dotProduct_star_self_nonneg _) hd⟩
@[simp]
protected theorem _root_.Matrix.posSemidef_intCast_iff
[StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n] [Nonempty n] [Nontrivial R] (d : ℤ) :
PosSemidef (d : Matrix n n R) ↔ 0 ≤ d :=
posSemidef_diagonal_iff.trans <| by simp [Pi.le_def]
protected lemma pow [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n]
{M : Matrix n n R} (hM : M.PosSemidef) (k : ℕ) :
PosSemidef (M ^ k) :=
match k with
| 0 => .one
| 1 => by simpa using hM
| (k + 2) => by
rw [pow_succ, pow_succ']
simpa only [hM.isHermitian.eq] using (hM.pow k).mul_mul_conjTranspose_same M
protected lemma inv [DecidableEq n] {M : Matrix n n R} (hM : M.PosSemidef) : M⁻¹.PosSemidef := by
by_cases h : IsUnit M.det
· have := (conjTranspose_mul_mul_same hM M⁻¹).conjTranspose
rwa [mul_nonsing_inv_cancel_right _ _ h, conjTranspose_conjTranspose] at this
· rw [nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit _ h]
exact .zero
protected lemma zpow [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n]
{M : Matrix n n R} (hM : M.PosSemidef) (z : ℤ) :
(M ^ z).PosSemidef := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl | rfl⟩ := z.eq_nat_or_neg
· simpa using hM.pow n
· simpa using (hM.pow n).inv
protected lemma add [AddLeftMono R] {A : Matrix m m R} {B : Matrix m m R}
(hA : A.PosSemidef) (hB : B.PosSemidef) : (A + B).PosSemidef :=
⟨hA.isHermitian.add hB.isHermitian, fun x => by
rw [add_mulVec, dotProduct_add]
exact add_nonneg (hA.2 x) (hB.2 x)⟩
/-- The eigenvalues of a positive semi-definite matrix are non-negative -/
lemma eigenvalues_nonneg [DecidableEq n] {A : Matrix n n 𝕜}
(hA : Matrix.PosSemidef A) (i : n) : 0 ≤ hA.1.eigenvalues i :=
(hA.re_dotProduct_nonneg _).trans_eq (hA.1.eigenvalues_eq _).symm
section sqrt
variable [DecidableEq n] {A : Matrix n n 𝕜} (hA : PosSemidef A)
/-- The positive semidefinite square root of a positive semidefinite matrix -/
noncomputable def sqrt : Matrix n n 𝕜 :=
hA.1.eigenvectorUnitary.1 * diagonal ((↑) ∘ Real.sqrt ∘ hA.1.eigenvalues) *
(star hA.1.eigenvectorUnitary : Matrix n n 𝕜)
open Lean PrettyPrinter.Delaborator SubExpr in
/-- Custom elaborator to produce output like `(_ : PosSemidef A).sqrt` in the goal view. -/
@[app_delab Matrix.PosSemidef.sqrt]
def delabSqrt : Delab :=
whenPPOption getPPNotation <|
whenNotPPOption getPPAnalysisSkip <|
withOverApp 7 <|
withOptionAtCurrPos `pp.analysis.skip true do
let e ← getExpr
guard <| e.isAppOfArity ``Matrix.PosSemidef.sqrt 7
let optionsPerPos ← withNaryArg 6 do
return (← read).optionsPerPos.setBool (← getPos) `pp.proofs.withType true
withTheReader Context ({· with optionsPerPos}) delab
lemma posSemidef_sqrt : PosSemidef hA.sqrt := by
apply PosSemidef.mul_mul_conjTranspose_same
refine posSemidef_diagonal_iff.mpr fun i ↦ ?_
rw [Function.comp_apply, RCLike.nonneg_iff]
constructor
· simp only [RCLike.ofReal_re]
exact Real.sqrt_nonneg _
· simp only [RCLike.ofReal_im]
@[simp]
lemma sq_sqrt : hA.sqrt ^ 2 = A := by
let C : Matrix n n 𝕜 := hA.1.eigenvectorUnitary
let E := diagonal ((↑) ∘ Real.sqrt ∘ hA.1.eigenvalues : n → 𝕜)
suffices C * (E * (star C * C) * E) * star C = A by
rw [Matrix.PosSemidef.sqrt, pow_two]
simpa only [← mul_assoc] using this
have : E * E = diagonal ((↑) ∘ hA.1.eigenvalues) := by
rw [diagonal_mul_diagonal]
congr! with v
simp [← pow_two, ← RCLike.ofReal_pow, Real.sq_sqrt (hA.eigenvalues_nonneg v)]
simpa [C, this] using hA.1.spectral_theorem.symm
@[simp]
lemma sqrt_mul_self : hA.sqrt * hA.sqrt = A := by rw [← pow_two, sq_sqrt]
include hA in
lemma eq_of_sq_eq_sq {B : Matrix n n 𝕜} (hB : PosSemidef B) (hAB : A ^ 2 = B ^ 2) : A = B := by
/- This is deceptively hard, much more difficult than the positive *definite* case. We follow a
clever proof due to Koeber and Schäfer. The idea is that if `A ≠ B`, then `A - B` has a nonzero
real eigenvalue, with eigenvector `v`. Then a manipulation using the identity
`A ^ 2 - B ^ 2 = A * (A - B) + (A - B) * B` leads to the conclusion that
`⟨v, A v⟩ + ⟨v, B v⟩ = 0`. Since `A, B` are positive semidefinite, both terms must be zero. Thus
`⟨v, (A - B) v⟩ = 0`, but this is a nonzero scalar multiple of `⟨v, v⟩`, contradiction. -/
by_contra h_ne
let ⟨v, t, ht, hv, hv'⟩ := (hA.1.sub hB.1).exists_eigenvector_of_ne_zero (sub_ne_zero.mpr h_ne)
have h_sum : 0 = t * (star v ⬝ᵥ A *ᵥ v + star v ⬝ᵥ B *ᵥ v) := calc
0 = star v ⬝ᵥ (A ^ 2 - B ^ 2) *ᵥ v := by rw [hAB, sub_self, zero_mulVec, dotProduct_zero]
_ = star v ⬝ᵥ A *ᵥ (A - B) *ᵥ v + star v ⬝ᵥ (A - B) *ᵥ B *ᵥ v := by
rw [mulVec_mulVec, mulVec_mulVec, ← dotProduct_add, ← add_mulVec, mul_sub, sub_mul,
add_sub, sub_add_cancel, pow_two, pow_two]
_ = t * (star v ⬝ᵥ A *ᵥ v) + (star v) ᵥ* (A - B)ᴴ ⬝ᵥ B *ᵥ v := by
rw [hv', mulVec_smul, dotProduct_smul, RCLike.real_smul_eq_coe_mul,
dotProduct_mulVec _ (A - B), hA.1.sub hB.1]
_ = t * (star v ⬝ᵥ A *ᵥ v + star v ⬝ᵥ B *ᵥ v) := by
simp_rw [← star_mulVec, hv', mul_add, ← RCLike.real_smul_eq_coe_mul, ← smul_dotProduct]
congr 2 with i
simp only [Pi.star_apply, Pi.smul_apply, RCLike.real_smul_eq_coe_mul, star_mul',
RCLike.star_def, RCLike.conj_ofReal]
replace h_sum : star v ⬝ᵥ A *ᵥ v + star v ⬝ᵥ B *ᵥ v = 0 := by
rw [eq_comm, ← mul_zero (t : 𝕜)] at h_sum
exact mul_left_cancel₀ (RCLike.ofReal_ne_zero.mpr ht) h_sum
have h_van : star v ⬝ᵥ A *ᵥ v = 0 ∧ star v ⬝ᵥ B *ᵥ v = 0 := by
refine ⟨le_antisymm ?_ (hA.2 v), le_antisymm ?_ (hB.2 v)⟩
· rw [add_comm, add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg] at h_sum
simpa only [h_sum, neg_nonneg] using hB.2 v
· simpa only [add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg.mp h_sum, neg_nonneg] using hA.2 v
have aux : star v ⬝ᵥ (A - B) *ᵥ v = 0 := by
rw [sub_mulVec, dotProduct_sub, h_van.1, h_van.2, sub_zero]
rw [hv', dotProduct_smul, RCLike.real_smul_eq_coe_mul, ← mul_zero ↑t] at aux
exact hv <| dotProduct_star_self_eq_zero.mp <| mul_left_cancel₀
(RCLike.ofReal_ne_zero.mpr ht) aux
lemma sqrt_sq : (hA.pow 2 : PosSemidef (A ^ 2)).sqrt = A :=
(hA.pow 2).posSemidef_sqrt.eq_of_sq_eq_sq hA (hA.pow 2).sq_sqrt
include hA in
lemma eq_sqrt_of_sq_eq {B : Matrix n n 𝕜} (hB : PosSemidef B) (hAB : A ^ 2 = B) : A = hB.sqrt := by
subst B
rw [hA.sqrt_sq]
end sqrt
end PosSemidef
@[simp]
theorem posSemidef_submatrix_equiv {M : Matrix n n R} (e : m ≃ n) :
(M.submatrix e e).PosSemidef ↔ M.PosSemidef :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using h.submatrix e.symm, fun h => h.submatrix _⟩
/-- The conjugate transpose of a matrix multiplied by the matrix is positive semidefinite -/
theorem posSemidef_conjTranspose_mul_self [StarOrderedRing R] (A : Matrix m n R) :
PosSemidef (Aᴴ * A) := by
refine ⟨isHermitian_transpose_mul_self _, fun x => ?_⟩
rw [← mulVec_mulVec, dotProduct_mulVec, vecMul_conjTranspose, star_star]
exact Finset.sum_nonneg fun i _ => star_mul_self_nonneg _
/-- A matrix multiplied by its conjugate transpose is positive semidefinite -/
theorem posSemidef_self_mul_conjTranspose [StarOrderedRing R] (A : Matrix m n R) :
PosSemidef (A * Aᴴ) := by
simpa only [conjTranspose_conjTranspose] using posSemidef_conjTranspose_mul_self Aᴴ
lemma eigenvalues_conjTranspose_mul_self_nonneg (A : Matrix m n 𝕜) [DecidableEq n] (i : n) :
0 ≤ (isHermitian_transpose_mul_self A).eigenvalues i :=
(posSemidef_conjTranspose_mul_self _).eigenvalues_nonneg _
lemma eigenvalues_self_mul_conjTranspose_nonneg (A : Matrix m n 𝕜) [DecidableEq m] (i : m) :
0 ≤ (isHermitian_mul_conjTranspose_self A).eigenvalues i :=
(posSemidef_self_mul_conjTranspose _).eigenvalues_nonneg _
/-- A matrix is positive semidefinite if and only if it has the form `Bᴴ * B` for some `B`. -/
lemma posSemidef_iff_eq_transpose_mul_self {A : Matrix n n 𝕜} :
PosSemidef A ↔ ∃ (B : Matrix n n 𝕜), A = Bᴴ * B := by
classical
refine ⟨fun hA ↦ ⟨hA.sqrt, ?_⟩, fun ⟨B, hB⟩ ↦ (hB ▸ posSemidef_conjTranspose_mul_self B)⟩
simp_rw [← PosSemidef.sq_sqrt hA, pow_two]
rw [hA.posSemidef_sqrt.1]
lemma IsHermitian.posSemidef_of_eigenvalues_nonneg [DecidableEq n] {A : Matrix n n 𝕜}
(hA : IsHermitian A) (h : ∀ i : n, 0 ≤ hA.eigenvalues i) : PosSemidef A := by
rw [hA.spectral_theorem]
refine (posSemidef_diagonal_iff.mpr ?_).mul_mul_conjTranspose_same _
simpa using h
/-- For `A` positive semidefinite, we have `x⋆ A x = 0` iff `A x = 0`. -/
theorem PosSemidef.dotProduct_mulVec_zero_iff
{A : Matrix n n 𝕜} (hA : PosSemidef A) (x : n → 𝕜) :
star x ⬝ᵥ A *ᵥ x = 0 ↔ A *ᵥ x = 0 := by
constructor
· obtain ⟨B, rfl⟩ := posSemidef_iff_eq_transpose_mul_self.mp hA
rw [← Matrix.mulVec_mulVec, dotProduct_mulVec,
vecMul_conjTranspose, star_star, dotProduct_star_self_eq_zero]
intro h0
rw [h0, mulVec_zero]
· intro h0
rw [h0, dotProduct_zero]
/-- For `A` positive semidefinite, we have `x⋆ A x = 0` iff `A x = 0` (linear maps version). -/
theorem PosSemidef.toLinearMap₂'_zero_iff [DecidableEq n]
{A : Matrix n n 𝕜} (hA : PosSemidef A) (x : n → 𝕜) :
| Matrix.toLinearMap₂' 𝕜 A (star x) x = 0 ↔ Matrix.toLin' A x = 0 := by
simpa only [toLinearMap₂'_apply', toLin'_apply] using hA.dotProduct_mulVec_zero_iff x
/-!
## Positive definite matrices
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/PosDef.lean | 324 | 328 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.SmallSets
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousOn
/-!
# Basic results on uniform spaces
Uniform spaces are a generalization of metric spaces and topological groups.
## Main definitions
In this file we define a complete lattice structure on the type `UniformSpace X`
of uniform structures on `X`, as well as the pullback (`UniformSpace.comap`) of uniform structures
coming from the pullback of filters.
Like distance functions, uniform structures cannot be pushed forward in general.
## Notations
Localized in `Uniformity`, we have the notation `𝓤 X` for the uniformity on a uniform space `X`,
and `○` for composition of relations, seen as terms with type `Set (X × X)`.
## References
The formalization uses the books:
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
* [I. M. James, *Topologies and Uniformities*][james1999]
But it makes a more systematic use of the filter library.
-/
open Set Filter Topology
universe u v ua ub uc ud
/-!
### Relations, seen as `Set (α × α)`
-/
variable {α : Type ua} {β : Type ub} {γ : Type uc} {δ : Type ud} {ι : Sort*}
open Uniformity
section UniformSpace
variable [UniformSpace α]
/-- If `s ∈ 𝓤 α`, then for any natural `n`, for a subset `t` of a sufficiently small set in `𝓤 α`,
we have `t ○ t ○ ... ○ t ⊆ s` (`n` compositions). -/
theorem eventually_uniformity_iterate_comp_subset {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) (n : ℕ) :
∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, (t ○ ·)^[n] t ⊆ s := by
suffices ∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, t ⊆ s ∧ (t ○ ·)^[n] t ⊆ s from (eventually_and.1 this).2
induction n generalizing s with
| zero => simpa
| succ _ ihn =>
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs with ⟨t, htU, hts⟩
refine (ihn htU).mono fun U hU => ?_
rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply']
exact
⟨hU.1.trans <| (subset_comp_self <| refl_le_uniformity htU).trans hts,
(compRel_mono hU.1 hU.2).trans hts⟩
/-- If `s ∈ 𝓤 α`, then for a subset `t` of a sufficiently small set in `𝓤 α`,
we have `t ○ t ⊆ s`. -/
theorem eventually_uniformity_comp_subset {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, t ○ t ⊆ s :=
eventually_uniformity_iterate_comp_subset hs 1
/-!
### Balls in uniform spaces
-/
namespace UniformSpace
open UniformSpace (ball)
lemma isOpen_ball (x : α) {V : Set (α × α)} (hV : IsOpen V) : IsOpen (ball x V) :=
hV.preimage <| .prodMk_right _
lemma isClosed_ball (x : α) {V : Set (α × α)} (hV : IsClosed V) : IsClosed (ball x V) :=
hV.preimage <| .prodMk_right _
/-!
### Neighborhoods in uniform spaces
-/
theorem hasBasis_nhds_prod (x y : α) :
HasBasis (𝓝 (x, y)) (fun s => s ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsSymmetricRel s) fun s => ball x s ×ˢ ball y s := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
apply (hasBasis_nhds x).prod_same_index (hasBasis_nhds y)
rintro U V ⟨U_in, U_symm⟩ ⟨V_in, V_symm⟩
exact
⟨U ∩ V, ⟨(𝓤 α).inter_sets U_in V_in, U_symm.inter V_symm⟩, ball_inter_left x U V,
ball_inter_right y U V⟩
end UniformSpace
open UniformSpace
theorem nhds_eq_uniformity_prod {a b : α} :
𝓝 (a, b) =
(𝓤 α).lift' fun s : Set (α × α) => { y : α | (y, a) ∈ s } ×ˢ { y : α | (b, y) ∈ s } := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq, nhds_nhds_eq_uniformity_uniformity_prod, lift_lift'_same_eq_lift']
· exact fun s => monotone_const.set_prod monotone_preimage
· refine fun t => Monotone.set_prod ?_ monotone_const
exact monotone_preimage (f := fun y => (y, a))
theorem nhdset_of_mem_uniformity {d : Set (α × α)} (s : Set (α × α)) (hd : d ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t : Set (α × α), IsOpen t ∧ s ⊆ t ∧
t ⊆ { p | ∃ x y, (p.1, x) ∈ d ∧ (x, y) ∈ s ∧ (y, p.2) ∈ d } := by
let cl_d := { p : α × α | ∃ x y, (p.1, x) ∈ d ∧ (x, y) ∈ s ∧ (y, p.2) ∈ d }
have : ∀ p ∈ s, ∃ t, t ⊆ cl_d ∧ IsOpen t ∧ p ∈ t := fun ⟨x, y⟩ hp =>
mem_nhds_iff.mp <|
show cl_d ∈ 𝓝 (x, y) by
rw [nhds_eq_uniformity_prod, mem_lift'_sets]
· exact ⟨d, hd, fun ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => ⟨x, y, ha, hp, hb⟩⟩
· exact fun _ _ h _ h' => ⟨h h'.1, h h'.2⟩
choose t ht using this
exact ⟨(⋃ p : α × α, ⋃ h : p ∈ s, t p h : Set (α × α)),
isOpen_iUnion fun p : α × α => isOpen_iUnion fun hp => (ht p hp).right.left,
fun ⟨a, b⟩ hp => by
simp only [mem_iUnion, Prod.exists]; exact ⟨a, b, hp, (ht (a, b) hp).right.right⟩,
iUnion_subset fun p => iUnion_subset fun hp => (ht p hp).left⟩
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem nhds_le_uniformity (x : α) : 𝓝 (x, x) ≤ 𝓤 α := by
intro V V_in
rcases comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets V_in with ⟨w, w_in, w_symm, w_sub⟩
have : ball x w ×ˢ ball x w ∈ 𝓝 (x, x) := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
exact prod_mem_prod (ball_mem_nhds x w_in) (ball_mem_nhds x w_in)
apply mem_of_superset this
rintro ⟨u, v⟩ ⟨u_in, v_in⟩
exact w_sub (mem_comp_of_mem_ball w_symm u_in v_in)
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem iSup_nhds_le_uniformity : ⨆ x : α, 𝓝 (x, x) ≤ 𝓤 α :=
iSup_le nhds_le_uniformity
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem nhdsSet_diagonal_le_uniformity : 𝓝ˢ (diagonal α) ≤ 𝓤 α :=
(nhdsSet_diagonal α).trans_le iSup_nhds_le_uniformity
section
variable (α)
theorem UniformSpace.has_seq_basis [IsCountablyGenerated <| 𝓤 α] :
∃ V : ℕ → Set (α × α), HasAntitoneBasis (𝓤 α) V ∧ ∀ n, IsSymmetricRel (V n) :=
let ⟨U, hsym, hbasis⟩ := (@UniformSpace.hasBasis_symmetric α _).exists_antitone_subbasis
⟨U, hbasis, fun n => (hsym n).2⟩
end
/-!
### Closure and interior in uniform spaces
-/
theorem closure_eq_uniformity (s : Set <| α × α) :
closure s = ⋂ V ∈ { V | V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsSymmetricRel V }, V ○ s ○ V := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp +contextual only
[mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis (UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds_prod x y), mem_iInter, mem_setOf_eq,
and_imp, mem_comp_comp, exists_prop, ← mem_inter_iff, inter_comm, Set.Nonempty]
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_closed :
HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsClosed V) id := by
refine Filter.hasBasis_self.2 fun t h => ?_
rcases comp_comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets h with ⟨w, w_in, w_symm, r⟩
refine ⟨closure w, mem_of_superset w_in subset_closure, isClosed_closure, ?_⟩
refine Subset.trans ?_ r
rw [closure_eq_uniformity]
apply iInter_subset_of_subset
apply iInter_subset
exact ⟨w_in, w_symm⟩
theorem uniformity_eq_uniformity_closure : 𝓤 α = (𝓤 α).lift' closure :=
Eq.symm <| uniformity_hasBasis_closed.lift'_closure_eq_self fun _ => And.right
theorem Filter.HasBasis.uniformity_closure {p : ι → Prop} {U : ι → Set (α × α)}
(h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p U) : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun i => closure (U i) :=
(@uniformity_eq_uniformity_closure α _).symm ▸ h.lift'_closure
/-- Closed entourages form a basis of the uniformity filter. -/
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_closure : HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α) closure :=
(𝓤 α).basis_sets.uniformity_closure
theorem closure_eq_inter_uniformity {t : Set (α × α)} : closure t = ⋂ d ∈ 𝓤 α, d ○ (t ○ d) :=
calc
closure t = ⋂ (V) (_ : V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsSymmetricRel V), V ○ t ○ V := closure_eq_uniformity t
_ = ⋂ V ∈ 𝓤 α, V ○ t ○ V :=
Eq.symm <|
UniformSpace.hasBasis_symmetric.biInter_mem fun _ _ hV =>
compRel_mono (compRel_mono hV Subset.rfl) hV
_ = ⋂ V ∈ 𝓤 α, V ○ (t ○ V) := by simp only [compRel_assoc]
theorem uniformity_eq_uniformity_interior : 𝓤 α = (𝓤 α).lift' interior :=
le_antisymm
(le_iInf₂ fun d hd => by
let ⟨s, hs, hs_comp⟩ := comp3_mem_uniformity hd
let ⟨t, ht, hst, ht_comp⟩ := nhdset_of_mem_uniformity s hs
have : s ⊆ interior d :=
calc
s ⊆ t := hst
_ ⊆ interior d :=
ht.subset_interior_iff.mpr fun x (hx : x ∈ t) =>
let ⟨x, y, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := ht_comp hx
hs_comp ⟨x, h₁, y, h₂, h₃⟩
have : interior d ∈ 𝓤 α := by filter_upwards [hs] using this
simp [this])
fun _ hs => ((𝓤 α).lift' interior).sets_of_superset (mem_lift' hs) interior_subset
theorem interior_mem_uniformity {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : interior s ∈ 𝓤 α := by
rw [uniformity_eq_uniformity_interior]; exact mem_lift' hs
theorem mem_uniformity_isClosed {s : Set (α × α)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : ∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, IsClosed t ∧ t ⊆ s :=
let ⟨t, ⟨ht_mem, htc⟩, hts⟩ := uniformity_hasBasis_closed.mem_iff.1 h
⟨t, ht_mem, htc, hts⟩
theorem isOpen_iff_isOpen_ball_subset {s : Set α} :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ V ∈ 𝓤 α, IsOpen V ∧ ball x V ⊆ s := by
rw [isOpen_iff_ball_subset]
constructor <;> intro h x hx
· obtain ⟨V, hV, hV'⟩ := h x hx
exact
⟨interior V, interior_mem_uniformity hV, isOpen_interior,
(ball_mono interior_subset x).trans hV'⟩
· obtain ⟨V, hV, -, hV'⟩ := h x hx
exact ⟨V, hV, hV'⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-18")] alias
isOpen_iff_open_ball_subset := isOpen_iff_isOpen_ball_subset
/-- The uniform neighborhoods of all points of a dense set cover the whole space. -/
theorem Dense.biUnion_uniformity_ball {s : Set α} {U : Set (α × α)} (hs : Dense s) (hU : U ∈ 𝓤 α) :
⋃ x ∈ s, ball x U = univ := by
refine iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => ?_
rcases hs.inter_nhds_nonempty (mem_nhds_right y hU) with ⟨x, hxs, hxy : (x, y) ∈ U⟩
exact ⟨x, hxs, hxy⟩
/-- The uniform neighborhoods of all points of a dense indexed collection cover the whole space. -/
lemma DenseRange.iUnion_uniformity_ball {ι : Type*} {xs : ι → α}
(xs_dense : DenseRange xs) {U : Set (α × α)} (hU : U ∈ uniformity α) :
⋃ i, UniformSpace.ball (xs i) U = univ := by
rw [← biUnion_range (f := xs) (g := fun x ↦ UniformSpace.ball x U)]
exact Dense.biUnion_uniformity_ball xs_dense hU
/-!
### Uniformity bases
-/
/-- Open elements of `𝓤 α` form a basis of `𝓤 α`. -/
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_open : HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsOpen V) id :=
hasBasis_self.2 fun s hs =>
⟨interior s, interior_mem_uniformity hs, isOpen_interior, interior_subset⟩
theorem Filter.HasBasis.mem_uniformity_iff {p : β → Prop} {s : β → Set (α × α)}
(h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) {t : Set (α × α)} :
t ∈ 𝓤 α ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ ∀ a b, (a, b) ∈ s i → (a, b) ∈ t :=
h.mem_iff.trans <| by simp only [Prod.forall, subset_def]
/-- Open elements `s : Set (α × α)` of `𝓤 α` such that `(x, y) ∈ s ↔ (y, x) ∈ s` form a basis
of `𝓤 α`. -/
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_open_symmetric :
HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsOpen V ∧ IsSymmetricRel V) id := by
simp only [← and_assoc]
refine uniformity_hasBasis_open.restrict fun s hs => ⟨symmetrizeRel s, ?_⟩
exact
⟨⟨symmetrize_mem_uniformity hs.1, IsOpen.inter hs.2 (hs.2.preimage continuous_swap)⟩,
symmetric_symmetrizeRel s, symmetrizeRel_subset_self s⟩
theorem comp_open_symm_mem_uniformity_sets {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, IsOpen t ∧ IsSymmetricRel t ∧ t ○ t ⊆ s := by
obtain ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs
obtain ⟨u, ⟨hu₁, hu₂, hu₃⟩, hu₄ : u ⊆ t⟩ := uniformity_hasBasis_open_symmetric.mem_iff.mp ht₁
exact ⟨u, hu₁, hu₂, hu₃, (compRel_mono hu₄ hu₄).trans ht₂⟩
end UniformSpace
open uniformity
section Constructions
instance : PartialOrder (UniformSpace α) :=
PartialOrder.lift (fun u => 𝓤[u]) fun _ _ => UniformSpace.ext
protected theorem UniformSpace.le_def {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} : u₁ ≤ u₂ ↔ 𝓤[u₁] ≤ 𝓤[u₂] := Iff.rfl
instance : InfSet (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨fun s =>
UniformSpace.ofCore
{ uniformity := ⨅ u ∈ s, 𝓤[u]
refl := le_iInf fun u => le_iInf fun _ => u.toCore.refl
symm := le_iInf₂ fun u hu =>
le_trans (map_mono <| iInf_le_of_le _ <| iInf_le _ hu) u.symm
comp := le_iInf₂ fun u hu =>
le_trans (lift'_mono (iInf_le_of_le _ <| iInf_le _ hu) <| le_rfl) u.comp }⟩
protected theorem UniformSpace.sInf_le {tt : Set (UniformSpace α)} {t : UniformSpace α}
(h : t ∈ tt) : sInf tt ≤ t :=
show ⨅ u ∈ tt, 𝓤[u] ≤ 𝓤[t] from iInf₂_le t h
protected theorem UniformSpace.le_sInf {tt : Set (UniformSpace α)} {t : UniformSpace α}
(h : ∀ t' ∈ tt, t ≤ t') : t ≤ sInf tt :=
show 𝓤[t] ≤ ⨅ u ∈ tt, 𝓤[u] from le_iInf₂ h
instance : Top (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨@UniformSpace.mk α ⊤ ⊤ le_top le_top fun x ↦ by simp only [nhds_top, comap_top]⟩
instance : Bot (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨{ toTopologicalSpace := ⊥
uniformity := 𝓟 idRel
symm := by simp [Tendsto]
comp := lift'_le (mem_principal_self _) <| principal_mono.2 id_compRel.subset
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity := fun s => by
let _ : TopologicalSpace α := ⊥; have := discreteTopology_bot α
simp [idRel] }⟩
instance : Min (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨fun u₁ u₂ =>
{ uniformity := 𝓤[u₁] ⊓ 𝓤[u₂]
symm := u₁.symm.inf u₂.symm
comp := (lift'_inf_le _ _ _).trans <| inf_le_inf u₁.comp u₂.comp
toTopologicalSpace := u₁.toTopologicalSpace ⊓ u₂.toTopologicalSpace
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity := fun _ ↦ by
rw [@nhds_inf _ u₁.toTopologicalSpace _, @nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ u₁,
@nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ u₂, comap_inf] }⟩
instance : CompleteLattice (UniformSpace α) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (PartialOrder (UniformSpace α)) with
sup := fun a b => sInf { x | a ≤ x ∧ b ≤ x }
le_sup_left := fun _ _ => UniformSpace.le_sInf fun _ ⟨h, _⟩ => h
le_sup_right := fun _ _ => UniformSpace.le_sInf fun _ ⟨_, h⟩ => h
sup_le := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => UniformSpace.sInf_le ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
le_inf := fun a _ _ h₁ h₂ => show a.uniformity ≤ _ from le_inf h₁ h₂
inf_le_left := fun a _ => show _ ≤ a.uniformity from inf_le_left
inf_le_right := fun _ b => show _ ≤ b.uniformity from inf_le_right
top := ⊤
le_top := fun a => show a.uniformity ≤ ⊤ from le_top
bot := ⊥
bot_le := fun u => u.toCore.refl
sSup := fun tt => sInf { t | ∀ t' ∈ tt, t' ≤ t }
le_sSup := fun _ _ h => UniformSpace.le_sInf fun _ h' => h' _ h
sSup_le := fun _ _ h => UniformSpace.sInf_le h
sInf := sInf
le_sInf := fun _ _ hs => UniformSpace.le_sInf hs
sInf_le := fun _ _ ha => UniformSpace.sInf_le ha }
theorem iInf_uniformity {ι : Sort*} {u : ι → UniformSpace α} : 𝓤[iInf u] = ⨅ i, 𝓤[u i] :=
iInf_range
theorem inf_uniformity {u v : UniformSpace α} : 𝓤[u ⊓ v] = 𝓤[u] ⊓ 𝓤[v] := rfl
lemma bot_uniformity : 𝓤[(⊥ : UniformSpace α)] = 𝓟 idRel := rfl
lemma top_uniformity : 𝓤[(⊤ : UniformSpace α)] = ⊤ := rfl
instance inhabitedUniformSpace : Inhabited (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨⊥⟩
instance inhabitedUniformSpaceCore : Inhabited (UniformSpace.Core α) :=
⟨@UniformSpace.toCore _ default⟩
instance [Subsingleton α] : Unique (UniformSpace α) where
uniq u := bot_unique <| le_principal_iff.2 <| by
rw [idRel, ← diagonal, diagonal_eq_univ]; exact univ_mem
/-- Given `f : α → β` and a uniformity `u` on `β`, the inverse image of `u` under `f`
is the inverse image in the filter sense of the induced function `α × α → β × β`.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev UniformSpace.comap (f : α → β) (u : UniformSpace β) : UniformSpace α where
uniformity := 𝓤[u].comap fun p : α × α => (f p.1, f p.2)
symm := by
simp only [tendsto_comap_iff, Prod.swap, (· ∘ ·)]
exact tendsto_swap_uniformity.comp tendsto_comap
comp := le_trans
(by
rw [comap_lift'_eq, comap_lift'_eq2]
· exact lift'_mono' fun s _ ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨x, h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨f x, h₁, h₂⟩
· exact monotone_id.compRel monotone_id)
(comap_mono u.comp)
toTopologicalSpace := u.toTopologicalSpace.induced f
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity x := by
simp only [nhds_induced, nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, comap_comap, Function.comp_def]
theorem uniformity_comap {_ : UniformSpace β} (f : α → β) :
𝓤[UniformSpace.comap f ‹_›] = comap (Prod.map f f) (𝓤 β) :=
rfl
lemma ball_preimage {f : α → β} {U : Set (β × β)} {x : α} :
UniformSpace.ball x (Prod.map f f ⁻¹' U) = f ⁻¹' UniformSpace.ball (f x) U := by
ext : 1
simp only [UniformSpace.ball, mem_preimage, Prod.map_apply]
@[simp]
theorem uniformSpace_comap_id {α : Type*} : UniformSpace.comap (id : α → α) = id := by
ext : 2
rw [uniformity_comap, Prod.map_id, comap_id]
theorem UniformSpace.comap_comap {α β γ} {uγ : UniformSpace γ} {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} :
UniformSpace.comap (g ∘ f) uγ = UniformSpace.comap f (UniformSpace.comap g uγ) := by
ext1
simp only [uniformity_comap, Filter.comap_comap, Prod.map_comp_map]
theorem UniformSpace.comap_inf {α γ} {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace γ} {f : α → γ} :
(u₁ ⊓ u₂).comap f = u₁.comap f ⊓ u₂.comap f :=
UniformSpace.ext Filter.comap_inf
theorem UniformSpace.comap_iInf {ι α γ} {u : ι → UniformSpace γ} {f : α → γ} :
(⨅ i, u i).comap f = ⨅ i, (u i).comap f := by
ext : 1
simp [uniformity_comap, iInf_uniformity]
theorem UniformSpace.comap_mono {α γ} {f : α → γ} :
Monotone fun u : UniformSpace γ => u.comap f := fun _ _ hu =>
Filter.comap_mono hu
theorem uniformContinuous_iff {α β} {uα : UniformSpace α} {uβ : UniformSpace β} {f : α → β} :
UniformContinuous f ↔ uα ≤ uβ.comap f :=
Filter.map_le_iff_le_comap
theorem le_iff_uniformContinuous_id {u v : UniformSpace α} :
u ≤ v ↔ @UniformContinuous _ _ u v id := by
rw [uniformContinuous_iff, uniformSpace_comap_id, id]
theorem uniformContinuous_comap {f : α → β} [u : UniformSpace β] :
@UniformContinuous α β (UniformSpace.comap f u) u f :=
tendsto_comap
theorem uniformContinuous_comap' {f : γ → β} {g : α → γ} [v : UniformSpace β] [u : UniformSpace α]
(h : UniformContinuous (f ∘ g)) : @UniformContinuous α γ u (UniformSpace.comap f v) g :=
tendsto_comap_iff.2 h
namespace UniformSpace
theorem to_nhds_mono {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} (h : u₁ ≤ u₂) (a : α) :
@nhds _ (@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₁) a ≤
@nhds _ (@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₂) a := by
rw [@nhds_eq_uniformity α u₁ a, @nhds_eq_uniformity α u₂ a]; exact lift'_mono h le_rfl
theorem toTopologicalSpace_mono {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} (h : u₁ ≤ u₂) :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₁ ≤ @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₂ :=
le_of_nhds_le_nhds <| to_nhds_mono h
theorem toTopologicalSpace_comap {f : α → β} {u : UniformSpace β} :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ (UniformSpace.comap f u) =
TopologicalSpace.induced f (@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace β u) :=
rfl
lemma uniformSpace_eq_bot {u : UniformSpace α} : u = ⊥ ↔ idRel ∈ 𝓤[u] :=
le_bot_iff.symm.trans le_principal_iff
protected lemma _root_.Filter.HasBasis.uniformSpace_eq_bot {ι p} {s : ι → Set (α × α)}
{u : UniformSpace α} (h : 𝓤[u].HasBasis p s) :
u = ⊥ ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ Pairwise fun x y : α ↦ (x, y) ∉ s i := by
simp [uniformSpace_eq_bot, h.mem_iff, subset_def, Pairwise, not_imp_not]
theorem toTopologicalSpace_bot : @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace α ⊥ = ⊥ := rfl
theorem toTopologicalSpace_top : @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace α ⊤ = ⊤ := rfl
theorem toTopologicalSpace_iInf {ι : Sort*} {u : ι → UniformSpace α} :
(iInf u).toTopologicalSpace = ⨅ i, (u i).toTopologicalSpace :=
TopologicalSpace.ext_nhds fun a ↦ by simp only [@nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ (iInf u), nhds_iInf,
iInf_uniformity, @nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ (u _), Filter.comap_iInf]
theorem toTopologicalSpace_sInf {s : Set (UniformSpace α)} :
(sInf s).toTopologicalSpace = ⨅ i ∈ s, @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace α i := by
rw [sInf_eq_iInf]
simp only [← toTopologicalSpace_iInf]
theorem toTopologicalSpace_inf {u v : UniformSpace α} :
(u ⊓ v).toTopologicalSpace = u.toTopologicalSpace ⊓ v.toTopologicalSpace :=
rfl
end UniformSpace
theorem UniformContinuous.continuous [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) : Continuous f :=
continuous_iff_le_induced.mpr <| UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace_mono <|
uniformContinuous_iff.1 hf
/-- Uniform space structure on `ULift α`. -/
instance ULift.uniformSpace [UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace (ULift α) :=
UniformSpace.comap ULift.down ‹_›
/-- Uniform space structure on `αᵒᵈ`. -/
instance OrderDual.instUniformSpace [UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace (αᵒᵈ) :=
‹UniformSpace α›
section UniformContinuousInfi
-- TODO: add an `iff` lemma?
theorem UniformContinuous.inf_rng {f : α → β} {u₁ : UniformSpace α} {u₂ u₃ : UniformSpace β}
(h₁ : UniformContinuous[u₁, u₂] f) (h₂ : UniformContinuous[u₁, u₃] f) :
UniformContinuous[u₁, u₂ ⊓ u₃] f :=
tendsto_inf.mpr ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
theorem UniformContinuous.inf_dom_left {f : α → β} {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} {u₃ : UniformSpace β}
(hf : UniformContinuous[u₁, u₃] f) : UniformContinuous[u₁ ⊓ u₂, u₃] f :=
tendsto_inf_left hf
theorem UniformContinuous.inf_dom_right {f : α → β} {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} {u₃ : UniformSpace β}
(hf : UniformContinuous[u₂, u₃] f) : UniformContinuous[u₁ ⊓ u₂, u₃] f :=
tendsto_inf_right hf
theorem uniformContinuous_sInf_dom {f : α → β} {u₁ : Set (UniformSpace α)} {u₂ : UniformSpace β}
{u : UniformSpace α} (h₁ : u ∈ u₁) (hf : UniformContinuous[u, u₂] f) :
UniformContinuous[sInf u₁, u₂] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [sInf_eq_iInf', iInf_uniformity]
exact tendsto_iInf' ⟨u, h₁⟩ hf
theorem uniformContinuous_sInf_rng {f : α → β} {u₁ : UniformSpace α} {u₂ : Set (UniformSpace β)} :
UniformContinuous[u₁, sInf u₂] f ↔ ∀ u ∈ u₂, UniformContinuous[u₁, u] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [sInf_eq_iInf', iInf_uniformity, tendsto_iInf, SetCoe.forall]
theorem uniformContinuous_iInf_dom {f : α → β} {u₁ : ι → UniformSpace α} {u₂ : UniformSpace β}
{i : ι} (hf : UniformContinuous[u₁ i, u₂] f) : UniformContinuous[iInf u₁, u₂] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [iInf_uniformity]
exact tendsto_iInf' i hf
theorem uniformContinuous_iInf_rng {f : α → β} {u₁ : UniformSpace α} {u₂ : ι → UniformSpace β} :
UniformContinuous[u₁, iInf u₂] f ↔ ∀ i, UniformContinuous[u₁, u₂ i] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [iInf_uniformity, tendsto_iInf]
end UniformContinuousInfi
/-- A uniform space with the discrete uniformity has the discrete topology. -/
theorem discreteTopology_of_discrete_uniformity [hα : UniformSpace α] (h : uniformity α = 𝓟 idRel) :
DiscreteTopology α :=
⟨(UniformSpace.ext h.symm : ⊥ = hα) ▸ rfl⟩
instance : UniformSpace Empty := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace PUnit := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace Bool := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace ℕ := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace ℤ := ⊥
section
variable [UniformSpace α]
open Additive Multiplicative
instance : UniformSpace (Additive α) := ‹UniformSpace α›
instance : UniformSpace (Multiplicative α) := ‹UniformSpace α›
theorem uniformContinuous_ofMul : UniformContinuous (ofMul : α → Additive α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformContinuous_toMul : UniformContinuous (toMul : Additive α → α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformContinuous_ofAdd : UniformContinuous (ofAdd : α → Multiplicative α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformContinuous_toAdd : UniformContinuous (toAdd : Multiplicative α → α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformity_additive : 𝓤 (Additive α) = (𝓤 α).map (Prod.map ofMul ofMul) := rfl
theorem uniformity_multiplicative : 𝓤 (Multiplicative α) = (𝓤 α).map (Prod.map ofAdd ofAdd) := rfl
end
instance instUniformSpaceSubtype {p : α → Prop} [t : UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace (Subtype p) :=
UniformSpace.comap Subtype.val t
theorem uniformity_subtype {p : α → Prop} [UniformSpace α] :
𝓤 (Subtype p) = comap (fun q : Subtype p × Subtype p => (q.1.1, q.2.1)) (𝓤 α) :=
rfl
theorem uniformity_setCoe {s : Set α} [UniformSpace α] :
𝓤 s = comap (Prod.map ((↑) : s → α) ((↑) : s → α)) (𝓤 α) :=
rfl
theorem map_uniformity_set_coe {s : Set α} [UniformSpace α] :
map (Prod.map (↑) (↑)) (𝓤 s) = 𝓤 α ⊓ 𝓟 (s ×ˢ s) := by
rw [uniformity_setCoe, map_comap, range_prodMap, Subtype.range_val]
theorem uniformContinuous_subtype_val {p : α → Prop} [UniformSpace α] :
UniformContinuous (Subtype.val : { a : α // p a } → α) :=
uniformContinuous_comap
theorem UniformContinuous.subtype_mk {p : α → Prop} [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : β → α}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) (h : ∀ x, p (f x)) :
UniformContinuous (fun x => ⟨f x, h x⟩ : β → Subtype p) :=
uniformContinuous_comap' hf
theorem uniformContinuousOn_iff_restrict [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
UniformContinuousOn f s ↔ UniformContinuous (s.restrict f) := by
delta UniformContinuousOn UniformContinuous
rw [← map_uniformity_set_coe, tendsto_map'_iff]; rfl
theorem tendsto_of_uniformContinuous_subtype [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β}
{s : Set α} {a : α} (hf : UniformContinuous fun x : s => f x.val) (ha : s ∈ 𝓝 a) :
Tendsto f (𝓝 a) (𝓝 (f a)) := by
rw [(@map_nhds_subtype_coe_eq_nhds α _ s a (mem_of_mem_nhds ha) ha).symm]
exact tendsto_map' hf.continuous.continuousAt
theorem UniformContinuousOn.continuousOn [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α}
(h : UniformContinuousOn f s) : ContinuousOn f s := by
rw [uniformContinuousOn_iff_restrict] at h
rw [continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict]
exact h.continuous
@[to_additive]
instance [UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace αᵐᵒᵖ :=
UniformSpace.comap MulOpposite.unop ‹_›
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformity_mulOpposite [UniformSpace α] :
𝓤 αᵐᵒᵖ = comap (fun q : αᵐᵒᵖ × αᵐᵒᵖ => (q.1.unop, q.2.unop)) (𝓤 α) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem comap_uniformity_mulOpposite [UniformSpace α] :
comap (fun p : α × α => (MulOpposite.op p.1, MulOpposite.op p.2)) (𝓤 αᵐᵒᵖ) = 𝓤 α := by
simpa [uniformity_mulOpposite, comap_comap, (· ∘ ·)] using comap_id
namespace MulOpposite
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformContinuous_unop [UniformSpace α] : UniformContinuous (unop : αᵐᵒᵖ → α) :=
uniformContinuous_comap
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformContinuous_op [UniformSpace α] : UniformContinuous (op : α → αᵐᵒᵖ) :=
uniformContinuous_comap' uniformContinuous_id
end MulOpposite
section Prod
open UniformSpace
/- a similar product space is possible on the function space (uniformity of pointwise convergence),
but we want to have the uniformity of uniform convergence on function spaces -/
instance instUniformSpaceProd [u₁ : UniformSpace α] [u₂ : UniformSpace β] : UniformSpace (α × β) :=
u₁.comap Prod.fst ⊓ u₂.comap Prod.snd
-- check the above produces no diamond for `simp` and typeclass search
example [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
(instTopologicalSpaceProd : TopologicalSpace (α × β)) = UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace := by
with_reducible_and_instances rfl
theorem uniformity_prod [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
𝓤 (α × β) =
((𝓤 α).comap fun p : (α × β) × α × β => (p.1.1, p.2.1)) ⊓
(𝓤 β).comap fun p : (α × β) × α × β => (p.1.2, p.2.2) :=
rfl
instance [UniformSpace α] [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 α)]
[UniformSpace β] [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 β)] : IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 (α × β)) := by
rw [uniformity_prod]
infer_instance
theorem uniformity_prod_eq_comap_prod [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
𝓤 (α × β) =
comap (fun p : (α × β) × α × β => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) (𝓤 α ×ˢ 𝓤 β) := by
simp_rw [uniformity_prod, prod_eq_inf, Filter.comap_inf, Filter.comap_comap, Function.comp_def]
theorem uniformity_prod_eq_prod [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
𝓤 (α × β) = map (fun p : (α × α) × β × β => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) (𝓤 α ×ˢ 𝓤 β) := by
rw [map_swap4_eq_comap, uniformity_prod_eq_comap_prod]
theorem mem_uniformity_of_uniformContinuous_invariant [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
{s : Set (β × β)} {f : α → α → β} (hf : UniformContinuous fun p : α × α => f p.1 p.2)
(hs : s ∈ 𝓤 β) : ∃ u ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ a b c, (a, b) ∈ u → (f a c, f b c) ∈ s := by
rw [UniformContinuous, uniformity_prod_eq_prod, tendsto_map'_iff] at hf
rcases mem_prod_iff.1 (mem_map.1 <| hf hs) with ⟨u, hu, v, hv, huvt⟩
exact ⟨u, hu, fun a b c hab => @huvt ((_, _), (_, _)) ⟨hab, refl_mem_uniformity hv⟩⟩
/-- An entourage of the diagonal in `α` and an entourage in `β` yield an entourage in `α × β`
once we permute coordinates. -/
def entourageProd (u : Set (α × α)) (v : Set (β × β)) : Set ((α × β) × α × β) :=
{((a₁, b₁),(a₂, b₂)) | (a₁, a₂) ∈ u ∧ (b₁, b₂) ∈ v}
theorem mem_entourageProd {u : Set (α × α)} {v : Set (β × β)} {p : (α × β) × α × β} :
p ∈ entourageProd u v ↔ (p.1.1, p.2.1) ∈ u ∧ (p.1.2, p.2.2) ∈ v := Iff.rfl
theorem entourageProd_mem_uniformity [t₁ : UniformSpace α] [t₂ : UniformSpace β] {u : Set (α × α)}
{v : Set (β × β)} (hu : u ∈ 𝓤 α) (hv : v ∈ 𝓤 β) :
entourageProd u v ∈ 𝓤 (α × β) := by
rw [uniformity_prod]; exact inter_mem_inf (preimage_mem_comap hu) (preimage_mem_comap hv)
theorem ball_entourageProd (u : Set (α × α)) (v : Set (β × β)) (x : α × β) :
ball x (entourageProd u v) = ball x.1 u ×ˢ ball x.2 v := by
ext p; simp only [ball, entourageProd, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_prod, Set.mem_preimage]
lemma IsSymmetricRel.entourageProd {u : Set (α × α)} {v : Set (β × β)}
(hu : IsSymmetricRel u) (hv : IsSymmetricRel v) :
IsSymmetricRel (entourageProd u v) :=
Set.ext fun _ ↦ and_congr hu.mk_mem_comm hv.mk_mem_comm
theorem Filter.HasBasis.uniformity_prod {ιa ιb : Type*} [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
{pa : ιa → Prop} {pb : ιb → Prop} {sa : ιa → Set (α × α)} {sb : ιb → Set (β × β)}
(ha : (𝓤 α).HasBasis pa sa) (hb : (𝓤 β).HasBasis pb sb) :
(𝓤 (α × β)).HasBasis (fun i : ιa × ιb ↦ pa i.1 ∧ pb i.2)
(fun i ↦ entourageProd (sa i.1) (sb i.2)) :=
(ha.comap _).inf (hb.comap _)
theorem entourageProd_subset [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
{s : Set ((α × β) × α × β)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 (α × β)) :
∃ u ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ v ∈ 𝓤 β, entourageProd u v ⊆ s := by
rcases (((𝓤 α).basis_sets.uniformity_prod (𝓤 β).basis_sets).mem_iff' s).1 h with ⟨w, hw⟩
use w.1, hw.1.1, w.2, hw.1.2, hw.2
theorem tendsto_prod_uniformity_fst [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
Tendsto (fun p : (α × β) × α × β => (p.1.1, p.2.1)) (𝓤 (α × β)) (𝓤 α) :=
le_trans (map_mono inf_le_left) map_comap_le
theorem tendsto_prod_uniformity_snd [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
Tendsto (fun p : (α × β) × α × β => (p.1.2, p.2.2)) (𝓤 (α × β)) (𝓤 β) :=
le_trans (map_mono inf_le_right) map_comap_le
theorem uniformContinuous_fst [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => p.1 :=
tendsto_prod_uniformity_fst
theorem uniformContinuous_snd [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => p.2 :=
tendsto_prod_uniformity_snd
variable [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] [UniformSpace γ]
theorem UniformContinuous.prodMk {f₁ : α → β} {f₂ : α → γ} (h₁ : UniformContinuous f₁)
(h₂ : UniformContinuous f₂) : UniformContinuous fun a => (f₁ a, f₂ a) := by
rw [UniformContinuous, uniformity_prod]
exact tendsto_inf.2 ⟨tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₁, tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₂⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias UniformContinuous.prod_mk := UniformContinuous.prodMk
theorem UniformContinuous.prodMk_left {f : α × β → γ} (h : UniformContinuous f) (b) :
UniformContinuous fun a => f (a, b) :=
h.comp (uniformContinuous_id.prodMk uniformContinuous_const)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias UniformContinuous.prod_mk_left := UniformContinuous.prodMk_left
theorem UniformContinuous.prodMk_right {f : α × β → γ} (h : UniformContinuous f) (a) :
UniformContinuous fun b => f (a, b) :=
h.comp (uniformContinuous_const.prodMk uniformContinuous_id)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias UniformContinuous.prod_mk_right := UniformContinuous.prodMk_right
theorem UniformContinuous.prodMap [UniformSpace δ] {f : α → γ} {g : β → δ}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) (hg : UniformContinuous g) : UniformContinuous (Prod.map f g) :=
(hf.comp uniformContinuous_fst).prodMk (hg.comp uniformContinuous_snd)
theorem toTopologicalSpace_prod {α} {β} [u : UniformSpace α] [v : UniformSpace β] :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace (α × β) instUniformSpaceProd =
@instTopologicalSpaceProd α β u.toTopologicalSpace v.toTopologicalSpace :=
rfl
/-- A version of `UniformContinuous.inf_dom_left` for binary functions -/
theorem uniformContinuous_inf_dom_left₂ {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {ua1 ua2 : UniformSpace α}
{ub1 ub2 : UniformSpace β} {uc1 : UniformSpace γ}
(h : by haveI := ua1; haveI := ub1; exact UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := ua1 ⊓ ua2; haveI := ub1 ⊓ ub2
exact UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2 := by
-- proof essentially copied from `continuous_inf_dom_left₂`
have ha := @UniformContinuous.inf_dom_left _ _ id ua1 ua2 ua1 (@uniformContinuous_id _ (id _))
have hb := @UniformContinuous.inf_dom_left _ _ id ub1 ub2 ub1 (@uniformContinuous_id _ (id _))
have h_unif_cont_id :=
@UniformContinuous.prodMap _ _ _ _ (ua1 ⊓ ua2) (ub1 ⊓ ub2) ua1 ub1 _ _ ha hb
exact @UniformContinuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ h h_unif_cont_id
/-- A version of `UniformContinuous.inf_dom_right` for binary functions -/
theorem uniformContinuous_inf_dom_right₂ {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {ua1 ua2 : UniformSpace α}
{ub1 ub2 : UniformSpace β} {uc1 : UniformSpace γ}
(h : by haveI := ua2; haveI := ub2; exact UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := ua1 ⊓ ua2; haveI := ub1 ⊓ ub2
exact UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2 := by
-- proof essentially copied from `continuous_inf_dom_right₂`
have ha := @UniformContinuous.inf_dom_right _ _ id ua1 ua2 ua2 (@uniformContinuous_id _ (id _))
have hb := @UniformContinuous.inf_dom_right _ _ id ub1 ub2 ub2 (@uniformContinuous_id _ (id _))
have h_unif_cont_id :=
@UniformContinuous.prodMap _ _ _ _ (ua1 ⊓ ua2) (ub1 ⊓ ub2) ua2 ub2 _ _ ha hb
exact @UniformContinuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ h h_unif_cont_id
/-- A version of `uniformContinuous_sInf_dom` for binary functions -/
theorem uniformContinuous_sInf_dom₂ {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {uas : Set (UniformSpace α)}
{ubs : Set (UniformSpace β)} {ua : UniformSpace α} {ub : UniformSpace β} {uc : UniformSpace γ}
(ha : ua ∈ uas) (hb : ub ∈ ubs) (hf : UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := sInf uas; haveI := sInf ubs
exact @UniformContinuous _ _ _ uc fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2 := by
-- proof essentially copied from `continuous_sInf_dom`
let _ : UniformSpace (α × β) := instUniformSpaceProd
have ha := uniformContinuous_sInf_dom ha uniformContinuous_id
have hb := uniformContinuous_sInf_dom hb uniformContinuous_id
have h_unif_cont_id := @UniformContinuous.prodMap _ _ _ _ (sInf uas) (sInf ubs) ua ub _ _ ha hb
exact @UniformContinuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ hf h_unif_cont_id
end Prod
section
open UniformSpace Function
variable {δ' : Type*} [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] [UniformSpace γ] [UniformSpace δ]
[UniformSpace δ']
local notation f " ∘₂ " g => Function.bicompr f g
/-- Uniform continuity for functions of two variables. -/
def UniformContinuous₂ (f : α → β → γ) :=
UniformContinuous (uncurry f)
theorem uniformContinuous₂_def (f : α → β → γ) :
UniformContinuous₂ f ↔ UniformContinuous (uncurry f) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem UniformContinuous₂.uniformContinuous {f : α → β → γ} (h : UniformContinuous₂ f) :
UniformContinuous (uncurry f) :=
h
theorem uniformContinuous₂_curry (f : α × β → γ) :
UniformContinuous₂ (Function.curry f) ↔ UniformContinuous f := by
rw [UniformContinuous₂, uncurry_curry]
theorem UniformContinuous₂.comp {f : α → β → γ} {g : γ → δ} (hg : UniformContinuous g)
(hf : UniformContinuous₂ f) : UniformContinuous₂ (g ∘₂ f) :=
hg.comp hf
theorem UniformContinuous₂.bicompl {f : α → β → γ} {ga : δ → α} {gb : δ' → β}
(hf : UniformContinuous₂ f) (hga : UniformContinuous ga) (hgb : UniformContinuous gb) :
UniformContinuous₂ (bicompl f ga gb) :=
hf.uniformContinuous.comp (hga.prodMap hgb)
end
theorem toTopologicalSpace_subtype [u : UniformSpace α] {p : α → Prop} :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace (Subtype p) instUniformSpaceSubtype =
@instTopologicalSpaceSubtype α p u.toTopologicalSpace :=
rfl
section Sum
variable [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
open Sum
-- Obsolete auxiliary definitions and lemmas
/-- Uniformity on a disjoint union. Entourages of the diagonal in the union are obtained
by taking independently an entourage of the diagonal in the first part, and an entourage of
the diagonal in the second part. -/
instance Sum.instUniformSpace : UniformSpace (α ⊕ β) where
uniformity := map (fun p : α × α => (inl p.1, inl p.2)) (𝓤 α) ⊔
map (fun p : β × β => (inr p.1, inr p.2)) (𝓤 β)
symm := fun _ hs ↦ ⟨symm_le_uniformity hs.1, symm_le_uniformity hs.2⟩
comp := fun s hs ↦ by
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs.1 with ⟨tα, htα, Htα⟩
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs.2 with ⟨tβ, htβ, Htβ⟩
filter_upwards [mem_lift' (union_mem_sup (image_mem_map htα) (image_mem_map htβ))]
rintro ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨z, ⟨⟨a, b⟩, hab, ⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨⟨a, b⟩, hab, ⟨⟩⟩, ⟨⟨_, c⟩, hbc, ⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨⟨_, c⟩, hbc, ⟨⟩⟩⟩
exacts [@Htα (_, _) ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩, @Htβ (_, _) ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩]
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity x := by
ext
cases x <;> simp [mem_comap', -mem_comap, nhds_inl, nhds_inr, nhds_eq_comap_uniformity,
Prod.ext_iff]
/-- The union of an entourage of the diagonal in each set of a disjoint union is again an entourage
of the diagonal. -/
theorem union_mem_uniformity_sum {a : Set (α × α)} (ha : a ∈ 𝓤 α) {b : Set (β × β)} (hb : b ∈ 𝓤 β) :
Prod.map inl inl '' a ∪ Prod.map inr inr '' b ∈ 𝓤 (α ⊕ β) :=
union_mem_sup (image_mem_map ha) (image_mem_map hb)
theorem Sum.uniformity : 𝓤 (α ⊕ β) = map (Prod.map inl inl) (𝓤 α) ⊔ map (Prod.map inr inr) (𝓤 β) :=
rfl
lemma uniformContinuous_inl : UniformContinuous (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) := le_sup_left
lemma uniformContinuous_inr : UniformContinuous (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) := le_sup_right
instance [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 α)] [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 β)] :
IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 (α ⊕ β)) := by
rw [Sum.uniformity]
infer_instance
end Sum
end Constructions
/-!
### Expressing continuity properties in uniform spaces
We reformulate the various continuity properties of functions taking values in a uniform space
in terms of the uniformity in the target. Since the same lemmas (essentially with the same names)
also exist for metric spaces and emetric spaces (reformulating things in terms of the distance or
the edistance in the target), we put them in a namespace `Uniform` here.
In the metric and emetric space setting, there are also similar lemmas where one assumes that
both the source and the target are metric spaces, reformulating things in terms of the distance
on both sides. These lemmas are generally written without primes, and the versions where only
the target is a metric space is primed. We follow the same convention here, thus giving lemmas
with primes.
-/
namespace Uniform
variable [UniformSpace α]
theorem tendsto_nhds_right {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (a, u x)) f (𝓤 α) := by
rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
theorem tendsto_nhds_left {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (u x, a)) f (𝓤 α) := by
rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity', tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
theorem continuousAt_iff'_right [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} :
ContinuousAt f b ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f b, f x)) (𝓝 b) (𝓤 α) := by
rw [ContinuousAt, tendsto_nhds_right]
theorem continuousAt_iff'_left [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} :
ContinuousAt f b ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f x, f b)) (𝓝 b) (𝓤 α) := by
rw [ContinuousAt, tendsto_nhds_left]
theorem continuousAt_iff_prod [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} :
ContinuousAt f b ↔ Tendsto (fun x : β × β => (f x.1, f x.2)) (𝓝 (b, b)) (𝓤 α) :=
⟨fun H => le_trans (H.prodMap' H) (nhds_le_uniformity _), fun H =>
continuousAt_iff'_left.2 <| H.comp <| tendsto_id.prodMk_nhds tendsto_const_nhds⟩
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff'_right [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s b ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f b, f x)) (𝓝[s] b) (𝓤 α) := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhds_right]
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff'_left [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s b ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f x, f b)) (𝓝[s] b) (𝓤 α) := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhds_left]
theorem continuousOn_iff'_right [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, Tendsto (fun x => (f b, f x)) (𝓝[s] b) (𝓤 α) := by
simp [ContinuousOn, continuousWithinAt_iff'_right]
theorem continuousOn_iff'_left [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, Tendsto (fun x => (f x, f b)) (𝓝[s] b) (𝓤 α) := by
simp [ContinuousOn, continuousWithinAt_iff'_left]
theorem continuous_iff'_right [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ b, Tendsto (fun x => (f b, f x)) (𝓝 b) (𝓤 α) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => tendsto_nhds_right
theorem continuous_iff'_left [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ b, Tendsto (fun x => (f x, f b)) (𝓝 b) (𝓤 α) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => tendsto_nhds_left
/-- Consider two functions `f` and `g` which coincide on a set `s` and are continuous there.
Then there is an open neighborhood of `s` on which `f` and `g` are uniformly close. -/
lemma exists_is_open_mem_uniformity_of_forall_mem_eq
[TopologicalSpace β] {r : Set (α × α)} {s : Set β}
{f g : β → α} (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ContinuousAt f x) (hg : ∀ x ∈ s, ContinuousAt g x)
(hfg : s.EqOn f g) (hr : r ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t, IsOpen t ∧ s ⊆ t ∧ ∀ x ∈ t, (f x, g x) ∈ r := by
have A : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t, IsOpen t ∧ x ∈ t ∧ ∀ z ∈ t, (f z, g z) ∈ r := by
intro x hx
obtain ⟨t, ht, htsymm, htr⟩ := comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets hr
have A : {z | (f x, f z) ∈ t} ∈ 𝓝 x := (hf x hx).preimage_mem_nhds (mem_nhds_left (f x) ht)
have B : {z | (g x, g z) ∈ t} ∈ 𝓝 x := (hg x hx).preimage_mem_nhds (mem_nhds_left (g x) ht)
rcases _root_.mem_nhds_iff.1 (inter_mem A B) with ⟨u, hu, u_open, xu⟩
refine ⟨u, u_open, xu, fun y hy ↦ ?_⟩
have I1 : (f y, f x) ∈ t := (htsymm.mk_mem_comm).2 (hu hy).1
have I2 : (g x, g y) ∈ t := (hu hy).2
rw [hfg hx] at I1
exact htr (prodMk_mem_compRel I1 I2)
choose! t t_open xt ht using A
refine ⟨⋃ x ∈ s, t x, isOpen_biUnion t_open, fun x hx ↦ mem_biUnion hx (xt x hx), ?_⟩
rintro x hx
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨y, ys, hy⟩
exact ht y ys x hy
end Uniform
theorem Filter.Tendsto.congr_uniformity {α β} [UniformSpace β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} {b : β}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 b)) (hg : Tendsto (fun x => (f x, g x)) l (𝓤 β)) : Tendsto g l (𝓝 b) :=
Uniform.tendsto_nhds_right.2 <| (Uniform.tendsto_nhds_right.1 hf).uniformity_trans hg
theorem Uniform.tendsto_congr {α β} [UniformSpace β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} {b : β}
(hfg : Tendsto (fun x => (f x, g x)) l (𝓤 β)) : Tendsto f l (𝓝 b) ↔ Tendsto g l (𝓝 b) :=
⟨fun h => h.congr_uniformity hfg, fun h => h.congr_uniformity hfg.uniformity_symm⟩
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean | 1,833 | 1,838 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.OfAssociative
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Eigenspace.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.StrongRankCondition
/-!
# The Lie algebra `sl₂` and its representations
The Lie algebra `sl₂` is the unique simple Lie algebra of minimal rank, 1, and as such occupies a
distinguished position in the general theory. This file provides some basic definitions and results
about `sl₂`.
## Main definitions:
* `IsSl2Triple`: a structure representing a triple of elements in a Lie algebra which satisfy the
standard relations for `sl₂`.
* `IsSl2Triple.HasPrimitiveVectorWith`: a structure representing a primitive vector in a
representation of a Lie algebra relative to a distinguished `sl₂` triple.
* `IsSl2Triple.HasPrimitiveVectorWith.exists_nat`: the eigenvalue of a primitive vector must be a
natural number if the representation is finite-dimensional.
-/
variable (R L M : Type*) [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R L]
[AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [LieRingModule L M] [LieModule R L M]
open LieModule Set
variable {L} in
/-- An `sl₂` triple within a Lie ring `L` is a triple of elements `h`, `e`, `f` obeying relations
which ensure that the Lie subalgebra they generate is equivalent to `sl₂`. -/
structure IsSl2Triple (h e f : L) : Prop where
h_ne_zero : h ≠ 0
lie_e_f : ⁅e, f⁆ = h
lie_h_e_nsmul : ⁅h, e⁆ = 2 • e
lie_h_f_nsmul : ⁅h, f⁆ = - (2 • f)
namespace IsSl2Triple
variable {L M}
variable {h e f : L}
| lemma symm (ht : IsSl2Triple h e f) : IsSl2Triple (-h) f e where
h_ne_zero := by simpa using ht.h_ne_zero
lie_e_f := by rw [← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, lie_skew, ht.lie_e_f]
lie_h_e_nsmul := by rw [neg_lie, neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, ht.lie_h_f_nsmul]
lie_h_f_nsmul := by rw [neg_lie, neg_inj, ht.lie_h_e_nsmul]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/Sl2.lean | 47 | 51 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Operations
/-!
# Maps on modules and ideals
Main definitions include `Ideal.map`, `Ideal.comap`, `RingHom.ker`, `Module.annihilator`
and `Submodule.annihilator`.
-/
assert_not_exists Basis -- See `RingTheory.Ideal.Basis`
Submodule.hasQuotient -- See `RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Operations`
universe u v w x
open Pointwise
namespace Ideal
section MapAndComap
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v}
section Semiring
variable {F : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S]
variable [FunLike F R S]
variable (f : F)
variable {I J : Ideal R} {K L : Ideal S}
/-- `I.map f` is the span of the image of the ideal `I` under `f`, which may be bigger than
the image itself. -/
def map (I : Ideal R) : Ideal S :=
span (f '' I)
/-- `I.comap f` is the preimage of `I` under `f`. -/
def comap [RingHomClass F R S] (I : Ideal S) : Ideal R where
carrier := f ⁻¹' I
add_mem' {x y} hx hy := by
simp only [Set.mem_preimage, SetLike.mem_coe, map_add f] at hx hy ⊢
exact add_mem hx hy
zero_mem' := by simp only [Set.mem_preimage, map_zero, SetLike.mem_coe, Submodule.zero_mem]
smul_mem' c x hx := by
simp only [smul_eq_mul, Set.mem_preimage, map_mul, SetLike.mem_coe] at *
exact mul_mem_left I _ hx
@[simp]
theorem coe_comap [RingHomClass F R S] (I : Ideal S) : (comap f I : Set R) = f ⁻¹' I := rfl
lemma comap_coe [RingHomClass F R S] (I : Ideal S) : I.comap (f : R →+* S) = I.comap f := rfl
lemma map_coe [RingHomClass F R S] (I : Ideal R) : I.map (f : R →+* S) = I.map f := rfl
variable {f}
theorem map_mono (h : I ≤ J) : map f I ≤ map f J :=
span_mono <| Set.image_subset _ h
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : F) {I : Ideal R} {x : R} (h : x ∈ I) : f x ∈ map f I :=
subset_span ⟨x, h, rfl⟩
theorem apply_coe_mem_map (f : F) (I : Ideal R) (x : I) : f x ∈ I.map f :=
mem_map_of_mem f x.2
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap [RingHomClass F R S] : map f I ≤ K ↔ I ≤ comap f K :=
span_le.trans Set.image_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_comap [RingHomClass F R S] {x} : x ∈ comap f K ↔ f x ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
theorem comap_mono [RingHomClass F R S] (h : K ≤ L) : comap f K ≤ comap f L :=
Set.preimage_mono fun _ hx => h hx
variable (f)
theorem comap_ne_top [RingHomClass F R S] (hK : K ≠ ⊤) : comap f K ≠ ⊤ :=
(ne_top_iff_one _).2 <| by rw [mem_comap, map_one]; exact (ne_top_iff_one _).1 hK
lemma exists_ideal_comap_le_prime {S} [CommSemiring S] [FunLike F R S] [RingHomClass F R S]
{f : F} (P : Ideal R) [P.IsPrime] (I : Ideal S) (le : I.comap f ≤ P) :
∃ Q ≥ I, Q.IsPrime ∧ Q.comap f ≤ P :=
have ⟨Q, hQ, hIQ, disj⟩ := I.exists_le_prime_disjoint (P.primeCompl.map f) <|
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _ ↦ by rintro hI ⟨r, hp, rfl⟩; exact hp (le hI)
⟨Q, hIQ, hQ, fun r hp' ↦ of_not_not fun hp ↦ Set.disjoint_left.mp disj hp' ⟨_, hp, rfl⟩⟩
variable {G : Type*} [FunLike G S R]
theorem map_le_comap_of_inv_on [RingHomClass G S R] (g : G) (I : Ideal R)
(hf : Set.LeftInvOn g f I) :
I.map f ≤ I.comap g := by
refine Ideal.span_le.2 ?_
rintro x ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
rw [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_comap, hf hx]
exact hx
theorem comap_le_map_of_inv_on [RingHomClass F R S] (g : G) (I : Ideal S)
(hf : Set.LeftInvOn g f (f ⁻¹' I)) :
I.comap f ≤ I.map g :=
fun x (hx : f x ∈ I) => hf hx ▸ Ideal.mem_map_of_mem g hx
/-- The `Ideal` version of `Set.image_subset_preimage_of_inverse`. -/
theorem map_le_comap_of_inverse [RingHomClass G S R] (g : G) (I : Ideal R)
(h : Function.LeftInverse g f) :
I.map f ≤ I.comap g :=
map_le_comap_of_inv_on _ _ _ <| h.leftInvOn _
variable [RingHomClass F R S]
instance (priority := low) [K.IsTwoSided] : (comap f K).IsTwoSided :=
⟨fun b ha ↦ by rw [mem_comap, map_mul]; exact mul_mem_right _ _ ha⟩
/-- The `Ideal` version of `Set.preimage_subset_image_of_inverse`. -/
theorem comap_le_map_of_inverse (g : G) (I : Ideal S) (h : Function.LeftInverse g f) :
I.comap f ≤ I.map g :=
comap_le_map_of_inv_on _ _ _ <| h.leftInvOn _
instance IsPrime.comap [hK : K.IsPrime] : (comap f K).IsPrime :=
⟨comap_ne_top _ hK.1, fun {x y} => by simp only [mem_comap, map_mul]; apply hK.2⟩
variable (I J K L)
theorem map_top : map f ⊤ = ⊤ :=
(eq_top_iff_one _).2 <| subset_span ⟨1, trivial, map_one f⟩
theorem gc_map_comap : GaloisConnection (Ideal.map f) (Ideal.comap f) := fun _ _ =>
Ideal.map_le_iff_le_comap
@[simp]
theorem comap_id : I.comap (RingHom.id R) = I :=
Ideal.ext fun _ => Iff.rfl
@[simp]
lemma comap_idₐ {R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring S] [Algebra R S] (I : Ideal S) :
Ideal.comap (AlgHom.id R S) I = I :=
I.comap_id
@[simp]
theorem map_id : I.map (RingHom.id R) = I :=
(gc_map_comap (RingHom.id R)).l_unique GaloisConnection.id comap_id
@[simp]
lemma map_idₐ {R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring S] [Algebra R S] (I : Ideal S) :
Ideal.map (AlgHom.id R S) I = I :=
I.map_id
theorem comap_comap {T : Type*} [Semiring T] {I : Ideal T} (f : R →+* S) (g : S →+* T) :
(I.comap g).comap f = I.comap (g.comp f) :=
rfl
lemma comap_comapₐ {R A B C : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Semiring B]
[Algebra R B] [Semiring C] [Algebra R C] {I : Ideal C} (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (g : B →ₐ[R] C) :
(I.comap g).comap f = I.comap (g.comp f) :=
I.comap_comap f.toRingHom g.toRingHom
theorem map_map {T : Type*} [Semiring T] {I : Ideal R} (f : R →+* S) (g : S →+* T) :
(I.map f).map g = I.map (g.comp f) :=
((gc_map_comap f).compose (gc_map_comap g)).l_unique (gc_map_comap (g.comp f)) fun _ =>
comap_comap _ _
lemma map_mapₐ {R A B C : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Semiring B]
[Algebra R B] [Semiring C] [Algebra R C] {I : Ideal A} (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (g : B →ₐ[R] C) :
(I.map f).map g = I.map (g.comp f) :=
I.map_map f.toRingHom g.toRingHom
theorem map_span (f : F) (s : Set R) : map f (span s) = span (f '' s) := by
refine (Submodule.span_eq_of_le _ ?_ ?_).symm
· rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩; exact mem_map_of_mem f (subset_span hx)
· rw [map_le_iff_le_comap, span_le, coe_comap, ← Set.image_subset_iff]
exact subset_span
variable {f I J K L}
theorem map_le_of_le_comap : I ≤ K.comap f → I.map f ≤ K :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_le
theorem le_comap_of_map_le : I.map f ≤ K → I ≤ K.comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u
theorem le_comap_map : I ≤ (I.map f).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).le_u_l _
theorem map_comap_le : (K.comap f).map f ≤ K :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_u_le _
@[simp]
theorem comap_top : (⊤ : Ideal S).comap f = ⊤ :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_top
@[simp]
theorem comap_eq_top_iff {I : Ideal S} : I.comap f = ⊤ ↔ I = ⊤ :=
⟨fun h => I.eq_top_iff_one.mpr (map_one f ▸ mem_comap.mp ((I.comap f).eq_top_iff_one.mp h)),
fun h => by rw [h, comap_top]⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_bot : (⊥ : Ideal R).map f = ⊥ :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_bot
theorem ne_bot_of_map_ne_bot (hI : map f I ≠ ⊥) : I ≠ ⊥ :=
fun h => hI (Eq.mpr (congrArg (fun I ↦ map f I = ⊥) h) map_bot)
variable (f I J K L)
@[simp]
theorem map_comap_map : ((I.map f).comap f).map f = I.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_u_l_eq_l I
@[simp]
theorem comap_map_comap : ((K.comap f).map f).comap f = K.comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f).u_l_u_eq_u K
theorem map_sup : (I ⊔ J).map f = I.map f ⊔ J.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_sup
theorem comap_inf : comap f (K ⊓ L) = comap f K ⊓ comap f L :=
rfl
variable {ι : Sort*}
theorem map_iSup (K : ι → Ideal R) : (iSup K).map f = ⨆ i, (K i).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_iSup
theorem comap_iInf (K : ι → Ideal S) : (iInf K).comap f = ⨅ i, (K i).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).u_iInf
theorem map_sSup (s : Set (Ideal R)) : (sSup s).map f = ⨆ I ∈ s, (I : Ideal R).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).l_sSup
theorem comap_sInf (s : Set (Ideal S)) : (sInf s).comap f = ⨅ I ∈ s, (I : Ideal S).comap f :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).u_sInf
theorem comap_sInf' (s : Set (Ideal S)) : (sInf s).comap f = ⨅ I ∈ comap f '' s, I :=
_root_.trans (comap_sInf f s) (by rw [iInf_image])
/-- Variant of `Ideal.IsPrime.comap` where ideal is explicit rather than implicit. -/
theorem comap_isPrime [H : IsPrime K] : IsPrime (comap f K) :=
H.comap f
variable {I J K L}
theorem map_inf_le : map f (I ⊓ J) ≤ map f I ⊓ map f J :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).monotone_l.map_inf_le _ _
theorem le_comap_sup : comap f K ⊔ comap f L ≤ comap f (K ⊔ L) :=
(gc_map_comap f : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f)).monotone_u.le_map_sup _ _
-- TODO: Should these be simp lemmas?
theorem _root_.element_smul_restrictScalars {R S M}
[CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Algebra R S] [AddCommMonoid M]
[Module R M] [Module S M] [IsScalarTower R S M] (r : R) (N : Submodule S M) :
(algebraMap R S r • N).restrictScalars R = r • N.restrictScalars R :=
SetLike.coe_injective (congrArg (· '' _) (funext (algebraMap_smul S r)))
theorem smul_restrictScalars {R S M} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
[Algebra R S] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [Module S M]
[IsScalarTower R S M] (I : Ideal R) (N : Submodule S M) :
(I.map (algebraMap R S) • N).restrictScalars R = I • N.restrictScalars R := by
simp_rw [map, Submodule.span_smul_eq, ← Submodule.coe_set_smul,
Submodule.set_smul_eq_iSup, ← element_smul_restrictScalars, iSup_image]
exact map_iSup₂ (Submodule.restrictScalarsLatticeHom R S M) _
@[simp]
theorem smul_top_eq_map {R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Algebra R S]
(I : Ideal R) : I • (⊤ : Submodule R S) = (I.map (algebraMap R S)).restrictScalars R :=
Eq.trans (smul_restrictScalars I (⊤ : Ideal S)).symm <|
congrArg _ <| Eq.trans (Ideal.smul_eq_mul _ _) (Ideal.mul_top _)
@[simp]
theorem coe_restrictScalars {R S : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [Module R S]
[IsScalarTower R S S] (I : Ideal S) : (I.restrictScalars R : Set S) = ↑I :=
rfl
/-- The smallest `S`-submodule that contains all `x ∈ I * y ∈ J`
is also the smallest `R`-submodule that does so. -/
@[simp]
theorem restrictScalars_mul {R S : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [Module R S]
[IsScalarTower R S S] (I J : Ideal S) :
(I * J).restrictScalars R = I.restrictScalars R * J.restrictScalars R :=
rfl
section Surjective
section
variable (hf : Function.Surjective f)
include hf
open Function
theorem map_comap_of_surjective (I : Ideal S) : map f (comap f I) = I :=
le_antisymm (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 le_rfl) fun s hsi =>
let ⟨r, hfrs⟩ := hf s
hfrs ▸ (mem_map_of_mem f <| show f r ∈ I from hfrs.symm ▸ hsi)
/-- `map` and `comap` are adjoint, and the composition `map f ∘ comap f` is the
identity -/
def giMapComap : GaloisInsertion (map f) (comap f) :=
GaloisInsertion.monotoneIntro (gc_map_comap f).monotone_u (gc_map_comap f).monotone_l
(fun _ => le_comap_map) (map_comap_of_surjective _ hf)
theorem map_surjective_of_surjective : Surjective (map f) :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_surjective
theorem comap_injective_of_surjective : Injective (comap f) :=
(giMapComap f hf).u_injective
theorem map_sup_comap_of_surjective (I J : Ideal S) : (I.comap f ⊔ J.comap f).map f = I ⊔ J :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_sup_u _ _
theorem map_iSup_comap_of_surjective (K : ι → Ideal S) : (⨆ i, (K i).comap f).map f = iSup K :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_iSup_u _
theorem map_inf_comap_of_surjective (I J : Ideal S) : (I.comap f ⊓ J.comap f).map f = I ⊓ J :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_inf_u _ _
theorem map_iInf_comap_of_surjective (K : ι → Ideal S) : (⨅ i, (K i).comap f).map f = iInf K :=
(giMapComap f hf).l_iInf_u _
theorem mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective {I : Ideal R} {y} (H : y ∈ map f I) : y ∈ f '' I :=
Submodule.span_induction (hx := H) (fun _ => id) ⟨0, I.zero_mem, map_zero f⟩
(fun _ _ _ _ ⟨x1, hx1i, hxy1⟩ ⟨x2, hx2i, hxy2⟩ =>
⟨x1 + x2, I.add_mem hx1i hx2i, hxy1 ▸ hxy2 ▸ map_add f _ _⟩)
fun c _ _ ⟨x, hxi, hxy⟩ =>
let ⟨d, hdc⟩ := hf c
⟨d * x, I.mul_mem_left _ hxi, hdc ▸ hxy ▸ map_mul f _ _⟩
theorem mem_map_iff_of_surjective {I : Ideal R} {y} : y ∈ map f I ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ I ∧ f x = y :=
⟨fun h => (Set.mem_image _ _ _).2 (mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective f hf h), fun ⟨_, hx⟩ =>
hx.right ▸ mem_map_of_mem f hx.left⟩
theorem le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective : comap f K ≤ I → K ≤ map f I := fun h =>
map_comap_of_surjective f hf K ▸ map_mono h
end
theorem map_comap_eq_self_of_equiv {E : Type*} [EquivLike E R S] [RingEquivClass E R S] (e : E)
(I : Ideal S) : map e (comap e I) = I :=
I.map_comap_of_surjective e (EquivLike.surjective e)
theorem map_eq_submodule_map (f : R →+* S) [h : RingHomSurjective f] (I : Ideal R) :
I.map f = Submodule.map f.toSemilinearMap I :=
Submodule.ext fun _ => mem_map_iff_of_surjective f h.1
instance (priority := low) (f : R →+* S) [RingHomSurjective f] (I : Ideal R) [I.IsTwoSided] :
(I.map f).IsTwoSided where
mul_mem_of_left b ha := by
rw [map_eq_submodule_map] at ha ⊢
obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := ha
obtain ⟨b, rfl⟩ := f.surjective b
rw [RingHom.coe_toSemilinearMap, ← map_mul]
exact ⟨_, I.mul_mem_right _ ha, rfl⟩
open Function in
theorem IsMaximal.comap_piEvalRingHom {ι : Type*} {R : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Semiring (R i)]
{i : ι} {I : Ideal (R i)} (h : I.IsMaximal) : (I.comap <| Pi.evalRingHom R i).IsMaximal := by
refine isMaximal_iff.mpr ⟨I.ne_top_iff_one.mp h.ne_top, fun J x le hxI hxJ ↦ ?_⟩
have ⟨r, y, hy, eq⟩ := h.exists_inv hxI
classical
convert J.add_mem (J.mul_mem_left (update 0 i r) hxJ)
(b := update 1 i y) (le <| by apply update_self i y 1 ▸ hy)
ext j
obtain rfl | ne := eq_or_ne j i
· simpa [eq_comm] using eq
· simp [update_of_ne ne]
theorem comap_le_comap_iff_of_surjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) (I J : Ideal S) :
comap f I ≤ comap f J ↔ I ≤ J :=
⟨fun h => (map_comap_of_surjective f hf I).symm.le.trans (map_le_of_le_comap h), fun h =>
le_comap_of_map_le ((map_comap_of_surjective f hf I).le.trans h)⟩
/-- The map on ideals induced by a surjective map preserves inclusion. -/
def orderEmbeddingOfSurjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) : Ideal S ↪o Ideal R where
toFun := comap f
inj' _ _ eq := SetLike.ext' (Set.preimage_injective.mpr hf <| SetLike.ext'_iff.mp eq)
map_rel_iff' := comap_le_comap_iff_of_surjective _ hf ..
theorem map_eq_top_or_isMaximal_of_surjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) {I : Ideal R}
(H : IsMaximal I) : map f I = ⊤ ∨ IsMaximal (map f I) :=
or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun ne_top ↦ ⟨⟨ne_top, fun _J hJ ↦ comap_injective_of_surjective f hf <|
H.1.2 _ (le_comap_map.trans_lt <| (orderEmbeddingOfSurjective f hf).strictMono hJ)⟩⟩
end Surjective
section Injective
theorem comap_bot_le_of_injective (hf : Function.Injective f) : comap f ⊥ ≤ I := by
refine le_trans (fun x hx => ?_) bot_le
rw [mem_comap, Submodule.mem_bot, ← map_zero f] at hx
exact Eq.symm (hf hx) ▸ Submodule.zero_mem ⊥
theorem comap_bot_of_injective (hf : Function.Injective f) : Ideal.comap f ⊥ = ⊥ :=
le_bot_iff.mp (Ideal.comap_bot_le_of_injective f hf)
end Injective
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : Ideal R`, then `map f.symm (map f I) = I`. -/
@[simp]
theorem map_of_equiv {I : Ideal R} (f : R ≃+* S) :
(I.map (f : R →+* S)).map (f.symm : S →+* R) = I := by
rw [← RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, ← RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, map_map,
RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingEquiv.symm_comp, map_id]
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : Ideal R`,
then `comap f (comap f.symm I) = I`. -/
@[simp]
theorem comap_of_equiv {I : Ideal R} (f : R ≃+* S) :
(I.comap (f.symm : S →+* R)).comap (f : R →+* S) = I := by
rw [← RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, ← RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, comap_comap,
RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingEquiv.toRingHom_eq_coe, RingEquiv.symm_comp, comap_id]
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : Ideal R`, then `map f I = comap f.symm I`. -/
theorem map_comap_of_equiv {I : Ideal R} (f : R ≃+* S) : I.map (f : R →+* S) = I.comap f.symm :=
le_antisymm (Ideal.map_le_comap_of_inverse _ _ _ (Equiv.left_inv' _))
(Ideal.comap_le_map_of_inverse _ _ _ (Equiv.right_inv' _))
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : Ideal R`, then `comap f.symm I = map f I`. -/
@[simp]
theorem comap_symm {I : Ideal R} (f : R ≃+* S) : I.comap f.symm = I.map f :=
(map_comap_of_equiv f).symm
/-- If `f : R ≃+* S` is a ring isomorphism and `I : Ideal R`, then `map f.symm I = comap f I`. -/
@[simp]
theorem map_symm {I : Ideal S} (f : R ≃+* S) : I.map f.symm = I.comap f :=
map_comap_of_equiv (RingEquiv.symm f)
@[simp]
theorem symm_apply_mem_of_equiv_iff {I : Ideal R} {f : R ≃+* S} {y : S} :
f.symm y ∈ I ↔ y ∈ I.map f := by
rw [← comap_symm, mem_comap]
@[simp]
theorem apply_mem_of_equiv_iff {I : Ideal R} {f : R ≃+* S} {x : R} :
f x ∈ I.map f ↔ x ∈ I := by
rw [← comap_symm, Ideal.mem_comap, f.symm_apply_apply]
theorem mem_map_of_equiv {E : Type*} [EquivLike E R S] [RingEquivClass E R S] (e : E)
{I : Ideal R} (y : S) : y ∈ map e I ↔ ∃ x ∈ I, e x = y := by
constructor
· intro h
simp_rw [show map e I = _ from map_comap_of_equiv (e : R ≃+* S)] at h
exact ⟨(e : R ≃+* S).symm y, h, (e : R ≃+* S).apply_symm_apply y⟩
· rintro ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact mem_map_of_mem e hx
section Bijective
variable (hf : Function.Bijective f) {I : Ideal R} {K : Ideal S}
include hf
/-- Special case of the correspondence theorem for isomorphic rings -/
def relIsoOfBijective : Ideal S ≃o Ideal R where
toFun := comap f
invFun := map f
left_inv := map_comap_of_surjective _ hf.2
right_inv J :=
le_antisymm
(fun _ h ↦ have ⟨y, hy, eq⟩ := (mem_map_iff_of_surjective _ hf.2).mp h; hf.1 eq ▸ hy)
le_comap_map
map_rel_iff' {_ _} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, comap_mono⟩
have := map_mono (f := f) h
simpa only [Equiv.coe_fn_mk, map_comap_of_surjective f hf.2] using this
theorem comap_le_iff_le_map : comap f K ≤ I ↔ K ≤ map f I :=
⟨fun h => le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective f hf.right h, fun h =>
(relIsoOfBijective f hf).right_inv I ▸ comap_mono h⟩
lemma comap_map_of_bijective : (I.map f).comap f = I :=
le_antisymm ((comap_le_iff_le_map f hf).mpr fun _ ↦ id) le_comap_map
theorem isMaximal_map_iff_of_bijective : IsMaximal (map f I) ↔ IsMaximal I := by
simpa only [isMaximal_def] using (relIsoOfBijective _ hf).symm.isCoatom_iff _
theorem isMaximal_comap_iff_of_bijective : IsMaximal (comap f K) ↔ IsMaximal K := by
simpa only [isMaximal_def] using (relIsoOfBijective _ hf).isCoatom_iff _
alias ⟨_, IsMaximal.map_bijective⟩ := isMaximal_map_iff_of_bijective
alias ⟨_, IsMaximal.comap_bijective⟩ := isMaximal_comap_iff_of_bijective
/-- A ring isomorphism sends a maximal ideal to a maximal ideal. -/
instance map_isMaximal_of_equiv {E : Type*} [EquivLike E R S] [RingEquivClass E R S] (e : E)
{p : Ideal R} [hp : p.IsMaximal] : (map e p).IsMaximal :=
hp.map_bijective e (EquivLike.bijective e)
/-- The pullback of a maximal ideal under a ring isomorphism is a maximal ideal. -/
instance comap_isMaximal_of_equiv {E : Type*} [EquivLike E R S] [RingEquivClass E R S] (e : E)
{p : Ideal S} [hp : p.IsMaximal] : (comap e p).IsMaximal :=
hp.comap_bijective e (EquivLike.bijective e)
theorem isMaximal_iff_of_bijective : (⊥ : Ideal R).IsMaximal ↔ (⊥ : Ideal S).IsMaximal :=
⟨fun h ↦ map_bot (f := f) ▸ h.map_bijective f hf, fun h ↦ have e := RingEquiv.ofBijective f hf
map_bot (f := e.symm) ▸ h.map_bijective _ e.symm.bijective⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-07")] alias map.isMaximal := IsMaximal.map_bijective
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-07")] alias comap.isMaximal := IsMaximal.comap_bijective
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-07")] alias RingEquiv.bot_maximal_iff := isMaximal_iff_of_bijective
end Bijective
end Semiring
section Ring
variable {F : Type*} [Ring R] [Ring S]
variable [FunLike F R S] [RingHomClass F R S] (f : F) {I : Ideal R}
section Surjective
theorem comap_map_of_surjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) (I : Ideal R) :
comap f (map f I) = I ⊔ comap f ⊥ :=
le_antisymm
(fun r h =>
let ⟨s, hsi, hfsr⟩ := mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective f hf h
Submodule.mem_sup.2
⟨s, hsi, r - s, (Submodule.mem_bot S).2 <| by rw [map_sub, hfsr, sub_self],
add_sub_cancel s r⟩)
(sup_le (map_le_iff_le_comap.1 le_rfl) (comap_mono bot_le))
/-- Correspondence theorem -/
def relIsoOfSurjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
Ideal S ≃o { p : Ideal R // comap f ⊥ ≤ p } where
toFun J := ⟨comap f J, comap_mono bot_le⟩
invFun I := map f I.1
left_inv J := map_comap_of_surjective f hf J
right_inv I :=
Subtype.eq <|
show comap f (map f I.1) = I.1 from
(comap_map_of_surjective f hf I).symm ▸ le_antisymm (sup_le le_rfl I.2) le_sup_left
map_rel_iff' {I1 I2} :=
⟨fun H => map_comap_of_surjective f hf I1 ▸ map_comap_of_surjective f hf I2 ▸ map_mono H,
comap_mono⟩
-- May not hold if `R` is a semiring: consider `ℕ →+* ZMod 2`.
theorem comap_isMaximal_of_surjective (hf : Function.Surjective f) {K : Ideal S} [H : IsMaximal K] :
IsMaximal (comap f K) := by
refine ⟨⟨comap_ne_top _ H.1.1, fun J hJ => ?_⟩⟩
suffices map f J = ⊤ by
have := congr_arg (comap f) this
rw [comap_top, comap_map_of_surjective _ hf, eq_top_iff] at this
rw [eq_top_iff]
exact le_trans this (sup_le (le_of_eq rfl) (le_trans (comap_mono bot_le) (le_of_lt hJ)))
refine
H.1.2 (map f J)
(lt_of_le_of_ne (le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective _ hf (le_of_lt hJ)) fun h =>
ne_of_lt hJ (_root_.trans (congr_arg (comap f) h) ?_))
rw [comap_map_of_surjective _ hf, sup_eq_left]
exact le_trans (comap_mono bot_le) (le_of_lt hJ)
end Surjective
end Ring
section CommRing
variable {F : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
variable [FunLike F R S] [rc : RingHomClass F R S]
variable (f : F)
variable (I J : Ideal R) (K L : Ideal S)
protected theorem map_mul {R} [Semiring R] [FunLike F R S] [RingHomClass F R S]
(f : F) (I J : Ideal R) :
map f (I * J) = map f I * map f J :=
le_antisymm
(map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <|
mul_le.2 fun r hri s hsj =>
show (f (r * s)) ∈ map f I * map f J by
rw [map_mul]; exact mul_mem_mul (mem_map_of_mem f hri) (mem_map_of_mem f hsj))
(span_mul_span (↑f '' ↑I) (↑f '' ↑J) ▸ (span_le.2 <|
Set.iUnion₂_subset fun _ ⟨r, hri, hfri⟩ =>
Set.iUnion₂_subset fun _ ⟨s, hsj, hfsj⟩ =>
Set.singleton_subset_iff.2 <|
hfri ▸ hfsj ▸ by rw [← map_mul]; exact mem_map_of_mem f (mul_mem_mul hri hsj)))
/-- The pushforward `Ideal.map` as a (semi)ring homomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def mapHom : Ideal R →+* Ideal S where
toFun := map f
map_mul' := Ideal.map_mul f
map_one' := by simp only [one_eq_top]; exact Ideal.map_top f
map_add' I J := Ideal.map_sup f I J
map_zero' := Ideal.map_bot
protected theorem map_pow (n : ℕ) : map f (I ^ n) = map f I ^ n :=
map_pow (mapHom f) I n
theorem comap_radical : comap f (radical K) = radical (comap f K) := by
ext
simp [radical]
variable {K}
theorem IsRadical.comap (hK : K.IsRadical) : (comap f K).IsRadical := by
rw [← hK.radical, comap_radical]
apply radical_isRadical
variable {I J L}
theorem map_radical_le : map f (radical I) ≤ radical (map f I) :=
map_le_iff_le_comap.2 fun r ⟨n, hrni⟩ => ⟨n, map_pow f r n ▸ mem_map_of_mem f hrni⟩
theorem le_comap_mul : comap f K * comap f L ≤ comap f (K * L) :=
map_le_iff_le_comap.1 <|
(Ideal.map_mul f (comap f K) (comap f L)).symm ▸
mul_mono (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| le_rfl) (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| le_rfl)
theorem le_comap_pow (n : ℕ) : K.comap f ^ n ≤ (K ^ n).comap f := by
induction' n with n n_ih
· rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, Ideal.one_eq_top, Ideal.one_eq_top]
exact rfl.le
· rw [pow_succ, pow_succ]
exact (Ideal.mul_mono_left n_ih).trans (Ideal.le_comap_mul f)
lemma disjoint_map_primeCompl_iff_comap_le {S : Type*} [Semiring S] {f : R →+* S}
{p : Ideal R} {I : Ideal S} [p.IsPrime] :
Disjoint (I : Set S) (p.primeCompl.map f) ↔ I.comap f ≤ p := by
rw [disjoint_comm]
simp [Set.disjoint_iff, Set.ext_iff, Ideal.primeCompl, not_imp_not, SetLike.le_def]
/-- For a prime ideal `p` of `R`, `p` extended to `S` and
restricted back to `R` is `p` if and only if `p` is the restriction of a prime in `S`. -/
lemma comap_map_eq_self_iff_of_isPrime {S : Type*} [CommSemiring S] {f : R →+* S}
(p : Ideal R) [p.IsPrime] :
(p.map f).comap f = p ↔ (∃ (q : Ideal S), q.IsPrime ∧ q.comap f = p) := by
refine ⟨fun hp ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨q, hq₁, hq₂, hq₃⟩ := Ideal.exists_le_prime_disjoint _ _
(disjoint_map_primeCompl_iff_comap_le.mpr hp.le)
exact ⟨q, hq₁, le_antisymm (disjoint_map_primeCompl_iff_comap_le.mp hq₃)
(map_le_iff_le_comap.mp hq₂)⟩
· rintro ⟨q, hq, rfl⟩
simp
end CommRing
end MapAndComap
end Ideal
namespace RingHom
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w}
section Semiring
| variable {F : Type*} {G : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [Semiring T]
variable [FunLike F R S] [rcf : RingHomClass F R S] [FunLike G T S] [rcg : RingHomClass G T S]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Ideal/Maps.lean | 650 | 651 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Raghuram Sundararajan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Raghuram Sundararajan
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Ext
/-!
# Extensionality lemmas for rings and similar structures
In this file we prove extensionality lemmas for the ring-like structures defined in
`Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/Defs.lean`, ranging from `NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring` to `CommRing`. These
extensionality lemmas take the form of asserting that two algebraic structures on a type are equal
whenever the addition and multiplication defined by them are both the same.
## Implementation details
We follow `Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Ext.lean` in using the term `(letI := i; HMul.hMul : R → R → R)` to
refer to the multiplication specified by a typeclass instance `i` on a type `R` (and similarly for
addition). We abbreviate these using some local notations.
Since `Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Ext.lean` proved several injectivity lemmas, we do so as well — even if
sometimes we don't need them to prove extensionality.
## Tags
semiring, ring, extensionality
-/
local macro:max "local_hAdd[" type:term ", " inst:term "]" : term =>
`(term| (letI := $inst; HAdd.hAdd : $type → $type → $type))
local macro:max "local_hMul[" type:term ", " inst:term "]" : term =>
`(term| (letI := $inst; HMul.hMul : $type → $type → $type))
universe u
variable {R : Type u}
/-! ### Distrib -/
namespace Distrib
| @[ext] theorem ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : Distrib R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_mul : local_hMul[R, inst₁] = local_hMul[R, inst₂]) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
-- Split into `add` and `mul` functions and properties.
rcases inst₁ with @⟨⟨⟩, ⟨⟩⟩
rcases inst₂ with @⟨⟨⟩, ⟨⟩⟩
-- Prove equality of parts using function extensionality.
congr
| Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/Ext.lean | 42 | 50 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Side
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Oriented.Rotation
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Affine
/-!
# Oriented angles.
This file defines oriented angles in Euclidean affine spaces.
## Main definitions
* `EuclideanGeometry.oangle`, with notation `∡`, is the oriented angle determined by three
points.
-/
noncomputable section
open Module Complex
open scoped Affine EuclideanGeometry Real RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
namespace EuclideanGeometry
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P] [hd2 : Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Module.Oriented ℝ V (Fin 2)]
/-- A fixed choice of positive orientation of Euclidean space `ℝ²` -/
abbrev o := @Module.Oriented.positiveOrientation
/-- The oriented angle at `p₂` between the line segments to `p₁` and `p₃`, modulo `2 * π`. If
either of those points equals `p₂`, this is 0. See `EuclideanGeometry.angle` for the
corresponding unoriented angle definition. -/
def oangle (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : Real.Angle :=
o.oangle (p₁ -ᵥ p₂) (p₃ -ᵥ p₂)
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "∡" => EuclideanGeometry.oangle
/-- Oriented angles are continuous when neither end point equals the middle point. -/
theorem continuousAt_oangle {x : P × P × P} (hx12 : x.1 ≠ x.2.1) (hx32 : x.2.2 ≠ x.2.1) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : P × P × P => ∡ y.1 y.2.1 y.2.2) x := by
unfold oangle
fun_prop (disch := simp [*])
/-- The angle ∡AAB at a point. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self_left (p₁ p₂ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₁ p₂ = 0 := by simp [oangle]
/-- The angle ∡ABB at a point. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self_right (p₁ p₂ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₂ = 0 := by simp [oangle]
/-- The angle ∡ABA at a point. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self_left_right (p₁ p₂ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₁ = 0 :=
o.oangle_self _
/-- If the angle between three points is nonzero, the first two points are not equal. -/
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0) : p₁ ≠ p₂ := by
rw [← @vsub_ne_zero V]; exact o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero h
/-- If the angle between three points is nonzero, the last two points are not equal. -/
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0) : p₃ ≠ p₂ := by
rw [← @vsub_ne_zero V]; exact o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero h
/-- If the angle between three points is nonzero, the first and third points are not equal. -/
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0) : p₁ ≠ p₃ := by
rw [← (vsub_left_injective p₂).ne_iff]; exact o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero h
/-- If the angle between three points is `π`, the first two points are not equal. -/
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between three points is `π`, the last two points are not equal. -/
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between three points is `π`, the first and third points are not equal. -/
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) : p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between three points is `π / 2`, the first two points are not equal. -/
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between three points is `π / 2`, the last two points are not equal. -/
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between three points is `π / 2`, the first and third points are not equal. -/
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (π / 2 : ℝ)) :
p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between three points is `-π / 2`, the first two points are not equal. -/
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between three points is `-π / 2`, the last two points are not equal. -/
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between three points is `-π / 2`, the first and third points are not equal. -/
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is nonzero, the first two points are not
equal. -/
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is nonzero, the last two points are not
equal. -/
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is nonzero, the first and third points are not
equal. -/
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0) : p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is positive, the first two points are not
equal. -/
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 1) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is positive, the last two points are not
equal. -/
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 1) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is positive, the first and third points are not
equal. -/
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 1) : p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is negative, the first two points are not
equal. -/
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = -1) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is negative, the last two points are not equal.
-/
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = -1) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between three points is negative, the first and third points are not
equal. -/
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = -1) :
p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
/-- Reversing the order of the points passed to `oangle` negates the angle. -/
theorem oangle_rev (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = -∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
o.oangle_rev _ _
/-- Adding an angle to that with the order of the points reversed results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ + ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = 0 :=
o.oangle_add_oangle_rev _ _
/-- An oriented angle is zero if and only if the angle with the order of the points reversed is
zero. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = 0 ↔ ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = 0 :=
o.oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero
/-- An oriented angle is `π` if and only if the angle with the order of the points reversed is
`π`. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π ↔ ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = π :=
o.oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi
/-- An oriented angle is not zero or `π` if and only if the three points are affinely
independent. -/
theorem oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_affineIndependent {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0 ∧ ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ π ↔ AffineIndependent ℝ ![p₁, p₂, p₃] := by
rw [oangle, o.oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_linearIndependent,
affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub ℝ _ (1 : Fin 3), ←
linearIndependent_equiv (finSuccAboveEquiv (1 : Fin 3))]
convert Iff.rfl
ext i
fin_cases i <;> rfl
/-- An oriented angle is zero or `π` if and only if the three points are collinear. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_collinear {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = 0 ∨ ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π ↔ Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃} : Set P) := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_or, oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_affineIndependent,
affineIndependent_iff_not_collinear_set]
/-- An oriented angle has a sign zero if and only if the three points are collinear. -/
theorem oangle_sign_eq_zero_iff_collinear {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
(∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 0 ↔ Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃} : Set P) := by
rw [Real.Angle.sign_eq_zero_iff, oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_collinear]
/-- If twice the oriented angles between two triples of points are equal, one triple is affinely
independent if and only if the other is. -/
theorem affineIndependent_iff_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P}
(h : (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆) :
AffineIndependent ℝ ![p₁, p₂, p₃] ↔ AffineIndependent ℝ ![p₄, p₅, p₆] := by
simp_rw [← oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_affineIndependent, ← Real.Angle.two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff, h]
/-- If twice the oriented angles between two triples of points are equal, one triple is collinear
if and only if the other is. -/
theorem collinear_iff_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P}
(h : (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆) :
Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃} : Set P) ↔ Collinear ℝ ({p₄, p₅, p₆} : Set P) := by
simp_rw [← oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_collinear, ← Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff, h]
/-- If corresponding pairs of points in two angles have the same vector span, twice those angles
are equal. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_of_vectorSpan_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P}
(h₁₂₄₅ : vectorSpan ℝ ({p₁, p₂} : Set P) = vectorSpan ℝ ({p₄, p₅} : Set P))
(h₃₂₆₅ : vectorSpan ℝ ({p₃, p₂} : Set P) = vectorSpan ℝ ({p₆, p₅} : Set P)) :
(2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆ := by
simp_rw [vectorSpan_pair] at h₁₂₄₅ h₃₂₆₅
exact o.two_zsmul_oangle_of_span_eq_of_span_eq h₁₂₄₅ h₃₂₆₅
/-- If the lines determined by corresponding pairs of points in two angles are parallel, twice
those angles are equal. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_of_parallel {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P}
(h₁₂₄₅ : line[ℝ, p₁, p₂] ∥ line[ℝ, p₄, p₅]) (h₃₂₆₅ : line[ℝ, p₃, p₂] ∥ line[ℝ, p₆, p₅]) :
(2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆ := by
rw [AffineSubspace.affineSpan_pair_parallel_iff_vectorSpan_eq] at h₁₂₄₅ h₃₂₆₅
exact two_zsmul_oangle_of_vectorSpan_eq h₁₂₄₅ h₃₂₆₅
/-- Given three points not equal to `p`, the angle between the first and the second at `p` plus
the angle between the second and the third equals the angle between the first and the third. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add {p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₂ + ∡ p₂ p p₃ = ∡ p₁ p p₃ :=
o.oangle_add (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃)
/-- Given three points not equal to `p`, the angle between the second and the third at `p` plus
the angle between the first and the second equals the angle between the first and the third. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_swap {p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p) :
∡ p₂ p p₃ + ∡ p₁ p p₂ = ∡ p₁ p p₃ :=
o.oangle_add_swap (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃)
/-- Given three points not equal to `p`, the angle between the first and the third at `p` minus
the angle between the first and the second equals the angle between the second and the third. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sub_left {p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₃ - ∡ p₁ p p₂ = ∡ p₂ p p₃ :=
o.oangle_sub_left (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃)
/-- Given three points not equal to `p`, the angle between the first and the third at `p` minus
the angle between the second and the third equals the angle between the first and the second. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sub_right {p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₃ - ∡ p₂ p p₃ = ∡ p₁ p p₂ :=
o.oangle_sub_right (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃)
/-- Given three points not equal to `p`, adding the angles between them at `p` in cyclic order
results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_cyc3 {p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₂ + ∡ p₂ p p₃ + ∡ p₃ p p₁ = 0 :=
o.oangle_add_cyc3 (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃)
/-- Pons asinorum, oriented angle-at-point form. -/
theorem oangle_eq_oangle_of_dist_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : dist p₁ p₂ = dist p₁ p₃) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₂ p₃ p₁ := by
simp_rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V] at h
rw [oangle, oangle, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₃ p₂ p₁, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₂ p₃ p₁,
o.oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq h]
/-- The angle at the apex of an isosceles triangle is `π` minus twice a base angle, oriented
angle-at-point form. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_of_dist_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hn : p₂ ≠ p₃)
(h : dist p₁ p₂ = dist p₁ p₃) : ∡ p₃ p₁ p₂ = π - (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
simp_rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V] at h
rw [oangle, oangle]
convert o.oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq _ h using 1
· rw [← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₁ p₃, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₁ p₂, o.oangle_neg_neg]
· rw [← o.oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq h]; simp
· simpa using hn
/-- A base angle of an isosceles triangle is acute, oriented angle-at-point form. -/
theorem abs_oangle_right_toReal_lt_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : dist p₁ p₂ = dist p₁ p₃) : |(∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).toReal| < π / 2 := by
simp_rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V] at h
rw [oangle, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₃ p₂ p₁]
exact o.abs_oangle_sub_right_toReal_lt_pi_div_two h
/-- A base angle of an isosceles triangle is acute, oriented angle-at-point form. -/
theorem abs_oangle_left_toReal_lt_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : dist p₁ p₂ = dist p₁ p₃) : |(∡ p₂ p₃ p₁).toReal| < π / 2 :=
oangle_eq_oangle_of_dist_eq h ▸ abs_oangle_right_toReal_lt_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq h
/-- The cosine of the oriented angle at `p` between two points not equal to `p` equals that of the
unoriented angle. -/
theorem cos_oangle_eq_cos_angle {p p₁ p₂ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) :
Real.Angle.cos (∡ p₁ p p₂) = Real.cos (∠ p₁ p p₂) :=
o.cos_oangle_eq_cos_angle (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂)
/-- The oriented angle at `p` between two points not equal to `p` is plus or minus the unoriented
angle. -/
theorem oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle {p p₁ p₂ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₂ = ∠ p₁ p p₂ ∨ ∡ p₁ p p₂ = -∠ p₁ p p₂ :=
o.oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂)
/-- The unoriented angle at `p` between two points not equal to `p` is the absolute value of the
oriented angle. -/
theorem angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal {p p₁ p₂ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) :
∠ p₁ p p₂ = |(∡ p₁ p p₂).toReal| :=
o.angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂)
/-- If the sign of the oriented angle at `p` between two points is zero, either one of the points
equals `p` or the unoriented angle is 0 or π. -/
theorem eq_zero_or_angle_eq_zero_or_pi_of_sign_oangle_eq_zero {p p₁ p₂ : P}
(h : (∡ p₁ p p₂).sign = 0) : p₁ = p ∨ p₂ = p ∨ ∠ p₁ p p₂ = 0 ∨ ∠ p₁ p p₂ = π := by
convert o.eq_zero_or_angle_eq_zero_or_pi_of_sign_oangle_eq_zero h <;> simp
/-- If two unoriented angles are equal, and the signs of the corresponding oriented angles are
equal, then the oriented angles are equal (even in degenerate cases). -/
theorem oangle_eq_of_angle_eq_of_sign_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∠ p₄ p₅ p₆)
(hs : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = (∡ p₄ p₅ p₆).sign) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆ :=
o.oangle_eq_of_angle_eq_of_sign_eq h hs
/-- If the signs of two nondegenerate oriented angles between points are equal, the oriented
angles are equal if and only if the unoriented angles are equal. -/
theorem angle_eq_iff_oangle_eq_of_sign_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p₂) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p₂)
(hp₄ : p₄ ≠ p₅) (hp₆ : p₆ ≠ p₅) (hs : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = (∡ p₄ p₅ p₆).sign) :
∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∠ p₄ p₅ p₆ ↔ ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆ :=
o.angle_eq_iff_oangle_eq_of_sign_eq (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₄)
(vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₆) hs
/-- The oriented angle between three points equals the unoriented angle if the sign is
positive. -/
theorem oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 1) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one h
/-- The oriented angle between three points equals minus the unoriented angle if the sign is
negative. -/
theorem oangle_eq_neg_angle_of_sign_eq_neg_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = -1) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = -∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
o.oangle_eq_neg_angle_of_sign_eq_neg_one h
/-- The unoriented angle at `p` between two points not equal to `p` is zero if and only if the
unoriented angle is zero. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero {p p₁ p₂ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₂ = 0 ↔ ∠ p₁ p p₂ = 0 :=
o.oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂)
/-- The oriented angle between three points is `π` if and only if the unoriented angle is `π`. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_angle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π ↔ ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π :=
o.oangle_eq_pi_iff_angle_eq_pi
/-- If the oriented angle between three points is `π / 2`, so is the unoriented angle. -/
theorem angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2 := by
rw [angle, ← InnerProductGeometry.inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two]
exact o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- If the oriented angle between three points is `π / 2`, so is the unoriented angle
(reversed). -/
theorem angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
∠ p₃ p₂ p₁ = π / 2 := by
rw [angle_comm]
exact angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- If the oriented angle between three points is `-π / 2`, the unoriented angle is `π / 2`. -/
theorem angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(-π / 2)) : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2 := by
rw [angle, ← InnerProductGeometry.inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two]
exact o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two h
/-- If the oriented angle between three points is `-π / 2`, the unoriented angle (reversed) is
`π / 2`. -/
theorem angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(-π / 2)) : ∠ p₃ p₂ p₁ = π / 2 := by
rw [angle_comm]
exact angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two h
/-- Swapping the first and second points in an oriented angle negates the sign of that angle. -/
theorem oangle_swap₁₂_sign (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : -(∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = (∡ p₂ p₁ p₃).sign := by
rw [eq_comm, oangle, oangle, ← o.oangle_neg_neg, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, ←
vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₁ p₃ p₂, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₃ p₂, sub_eq_add_neg,
neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₂ p₁, add_comm, ← @neg_one_smul ℝ]
nth_rw 2 [← one_smul ℝ (p₁ -ᵥ p₂)]
rw [o.oangle_sign_smul_add_smul_right]
simp
/-- Swapping the first and third points in an oriented angle negates the sign of that angle. -/
theorem oangle_swap₁₃_sign (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : -(∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = (∡ p₃ p₂ p₁).sign := by
rw [oangle_rev, Real.Angle.sign_neg, neg_neg]
/-- Swapping the second and third points in an oriented angle negates the sign of that angle. -/
theorem oangle_swap₂₃_sign (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : -(∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = (∡ p₁ p₃ p₂).sign := by
rw [oangle_swap₁₃_sign, ← oangle_swap₁₂_sign, oangle_swap₁₃_sign]
/-- Rotating the points in an oriented angle does not change the sign of that angle. -/
theorem oangle_rotate_sign (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁).sign = (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign := by
rw [← oangle_swap₁₂_sign, oangle_swap₁₃_sign]
/-- The oriented angle between three points is π if and only if the second point is strictly
between the other two. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_sbtw {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π ↔ Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
rw [oangle_eq_pi_iff_angle_eq_pi, angle_eq_pi_iff_sbtw]
/-- If the second of three points is strictly between the other two, the oriented angle at that
point is π. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₁₂₃_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π :=
oangle_eq_pi_iff_sbtw.2 h
/-- If the second of three points is strictly between the other two, the oriented angle at that
point (reversed) is π. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₃₂₁_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = π := by
rw [oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi, ← h.oangle₁₂₃_eq_pi]
/-- If the second of three points is weakly between the other two, the oriented angle at the
first point is zero. -/
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₂ p₁ p₃ = 0 := by
by_cases hp₂p₁ : p₂ = p₁; · simp [hp₂p₁]
by_cases hp₃p₁ : p₃ = p₁; · simp [hp₃p₁]
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero hp₂p₁ hp₃p₁]
exact h.angle₂₁₃_eq_zero_of_ne hp₂p₁
/-- If the second of three points is strictly between the other two, the oriented angle at the
first point is zero. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₂ p₁ p₃ = 0 :=
h.wbtw.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero
/-- If the second of three points is weakly between the other two, the oriented angle at the
first point (reversed) is zero. -/
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₃ p₁ p₂ = 0 := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero, h.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero]
/-- If the second of three points is strictly between the other two, the oriented angle at the
first point (reversed) is zero. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₃ p₁ p₂ = 0 :=
h.wbtw.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero
/-- If the second of three points is weakly between the other two, the oriented angle at the
third point is zero. -/
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle₂₃₁_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₂ p₃ p₁ = 0 :=
h.symm.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero
/-- If the second of three points is strictly between the other two, the oriented angle at the
third point is zero. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₂₃₁_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₂ p₃ p₁ = 0 :=
h.wbtw.oangle₂₃₁_eq_zero
/-- If the second of three points is weakly between the other two, the oriented angle at the
third point (reversed) is zero. -/
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle₁₃₂_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₁ p₃ p₂ = 0 :=
h.symm.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero
/-- If the second of three points is strictly between the other two, the oriented angle at the
third point (reversed) is zero. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₁₃₂_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₁ p₃ p₂ = 0 :=
h.wbtw.oangle₁₃₂_eq_zero
/-- The oriented angle between three points is zero if and only if one of the first and third
points is weakly between the other two. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_wbtw {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = 0 ↔ Wbtw ℝ p₂ p₁ p₃ ∨ Wbtw ℝ p₂ p₃ p₁ := by
by_cases hp₁p₂ : p₁ = p₂; · simp [hp₁p₂]
by_cases hp₃p₂ : p₃ = p₂; · simp [hp₃p₂]
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero hp₁p₂ hp₃p₂, angle_eq_zero_iff_ne_and_wbtw]
simp [hp₁p₂, hp₃p₂]
/-- An oriented angle is unchanged by replacing the first point by one weakly further away on the
same ray. -/
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle_eq_left {p₁ p₁' p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₂ p₁ p₁') (hp₁p₂ : p₁ ≠ p₂) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁' p₂ p₃ := by
by_cases hp₃p₂ : p₃ = p₂; · simp [hp₃p₂]
by_cases hp₁'p₂ : p₁' = p₂; · rw [hp₁'p₂, wbtw_self_iff] at h; exact False.elim (hp₁p₂ h)
rw [← oangle_add hp₁'p₂ hp₁p₂ hp₃p₂, h.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero, zero_add]
/-- An oriented angle is unchanged by replacing the first point by one strictly further away on
the same ray. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle_eq_left {p₁ p₁' p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₂ p₁ p₁') :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁' p₂ p₃ :=
h.wbtw.oangle_eq_left h.ne_left
/-- An oriented angle is unchanged by replacing the third point by one weakly further away on the
same ray. -/
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle_eq_right {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₃' : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₂ p₃ p₃') (hp₃p₂ : p₃ ≠ p₂) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃' := by rw [oangle_rev, h.oangle_eq_left hp₃p₂, ← oangle_rev]
/-- An oriented angle is unchanged by replacing the third point by one strictly further away on
the same ray. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle_eq_right {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₃' : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₂ p₃ p₃') :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃' :=
h.wbtw.oangle_eq_right h.ne_left
/-- An oriented angle is unchanged by replacing the first point with the midpoint of the segment
between it and the second point. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_midpoint_left (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∡ (midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂) p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
by_cases h : p₁ = p₂; · simp [h]
exact (sbtw_midpoint_of_ne ℝ h).symm.oangle_eq_left
/-- An oriented angle is unchanged by replacing the first point with the midpoint of the segment
between the second point and that point. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_midpoint_rev_left (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∡ (midpoint ℝ p₂ p₁) p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
rw [midpoint_comm, oangle_midpoint_left]
/-- An oriented angle is unchanged by replacing the third point with the midpoint of the segment
between it and the second point. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_midpoint_right (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₂ (midpoint ℝ p₃ p₂) = ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
by_cases h : p₃ = p₂; · simp [h]
exact (sbtw_midpoint_of_ne ℝ h).symm.oangle_eq_right
/-- An oriented angle is unchanged by replacing the third point with the midpoint of the segment
between the second point and that point. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_midpoint_rev_right (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₂ (midpoint ℝ p₂ p₃) = ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
rw [midpoint_comm, oangle_midpoint_right]
/-- Replacing the first point by one on the same line but the opposite ray adds π to the oriented
angle. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle_eq_add_pi_left
{p₁ p₁' p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₁') (hp₃p₂ : p₃ ≠ p₂) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁' p₂ p₃ + π := by
rw [← h.oangle₁₂₃_eq_pi, oangle_add_swap h.left_ne h.right_ne hp₃p₂]
/-- Replacing the third point by one on the same line but the opposite ray adds π to the oriented
angle. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle_eq_add_pi_right
{p₁ p₂ p₃ p₃' : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₃ p₂ p₃') (hp₁p₂ : p₁ ≠ p₂) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃' + π := by
rw [← h.oangle₃₂₁_eq_pi, oangle_add hp₁p₂ h.right_ne h.left_ne]
/-- Replacing both the first and third points by ones on the same lines but the opposite rays
does not change the oriented angle (vertically opposite angles). -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle_eq_left_right {p₁ p₁' p₂ p₃ p₃' : P} (h₁ : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₁')
(h₃ : Sbtw ℝ p₃ p₂ p₃') : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁' p₂ p₃' := by
rw [h₁.oangle_eq_add_pi_left h₃.left_ne, h₃.oangle_eq_add_pi_right h₁.right_ne, add_assoc,
Real.Angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi, add_zero]
/-- Replacing the first point by one on the same line does not change twice the oriented angle. -/
theorem _root_.Collinear.two_zsmul_oangle_eq_left {p₁ p₁' p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₁'} : Set P)) (hp₁p₂ : p₁ ≠ p₂) (hp₁'p₂ : p₁' ≠ p₂) :
(2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁' p₂ p₃ := by
by_cases hp₃p₂ : p₃ = p₂; · simp [hp₃p₂]
rcases h.wbtw_or_wbtw_or_wbtw with (hw | hw | hw)
· have hw' : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₁' := ⟨hw, hp₁p₂.symm, hp₁'p₂.symm⟩
rw [hw'.oangle_eq_add_pi_left hp₃p₂, smul_add, Real.Angle.two_zsmul_coe_pi, add_zero]
· rw [hw.oangle_eq_left hp₁'p₂]
· rw [hw.symm.oangle_eq_left hp₁p₂]
/-- Replacing the third point by one on the same line does not change twice the oriented angle. -/
theorem _root_.Collinear.two_zsmul_oangle_eq_right {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₃' : P}
(h : Collinear ℝ ({p₃, p₂, p₃'} : Set P)) (hp₃p₂ : p₃ ≠ p₂) (hp₃'p₂ : p₃' ≠ p₂) :
(2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃' := by
rw [oangle_rev, smul_neg, h.two_zsmul_oangle_eq_left hp₃p₂ hp₃'p₂, ← smul_neg, ← oangle_rev]
/-- Two different points are equidistant from a third point if and only if that third point
equals some multiple of a `π / 2` rotation of the vector between those points, plus the midpoint
of those points. -/
theorem dist_eq_iff_eq_smul_rotation_pi_div_two_vadd_midpoint {p₁ p₂ p : P} (h : p₁ ≠ p₂) :
dist p₁ p = dist p₂ p ↔
∃ r : ℝ, r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂ = p := by
refine ⟨fun hd => ?_, fun hr => ?_⟩
· have hi : ⟪p₂ -ᵥ p₁, p -ᵥ midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂⟫ = 0 := by
rw [@dist_eq_norm_vsub' V, @dist_eq_norm_vsub' V, ←
mul_self_inj (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _), ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, ←
real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm] at hd
simp_rw [vsub_midpoint, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₂ p₁ p, inner_sub_left, inner_add_right,
inner_smul_right, hd, real_inner_comm (p -ᵥ p₁)]
abel
rw [@Orientation.inner_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero_or_eq_smul_rotation_pi_div_two V _ _ _ o,
or_iff_right (vsub_ne_zero.2 h.symm)] at hi
rcases hi with ⟨r, hr⟩
rw [eq_comm, ← eq_vadd_iff_vsub_eq] at hr
exact ⟨r, hr.symm⟩
· rcases hr with ⟨r, rfl⟩
simp_rw [@dist_eq_norm_vsub V, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, left_vsub_midpoint, right_vsub_midpoint,
invOf_eq_inv, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₂ p₁, ← mul_self_inj (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _), ←
real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, inner_sub_sub_self]
simp [-neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
open AffineSubspace
/-- Given two pairs of distinct points on the same line, such that the vectors between those
pairs of points are on the same ray (oriented in the same direction on that line), and a fifth
point, the angles at the fifth point between each of those two pairs of points have the same
sign. -/
theorem _root_.Collinear.oangle_sign_of_sameRay_vsub {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ : P} (p₅ : P) (hp₁p₂ : p₁ ≠ p₂)
(hp₃p₄ : p₃ ≠ p₄) (hc : Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃, p₄} : Set P))
(hr : SameRay ℝ (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) (p₄ -ᵥ p₃)) : (∡ p₁ p₅ p₂).sign = (∡ p₃ p₅ p₄).sign := by
by_cases hc₅₁₂ : Collinear ℝ ({p₅, p₁, p₂} : Set P)
· have hc₅₁₂₃₄ : Collinear ℝ ({p₅, p₁, p₂, p₃, p₄} : Set P) :=
(hc.collinear_insert_iff_of_ne (Set.mem_insert _ _)
(Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_insert _ _)) hp₁p₂).2 hc₅₁₂
have hc₅₃₄ : Collinear ℝ ({p₅, p₃, p₄} : Set P) :=
(hc.collinear_insert_iff_of_ne
(Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_insert _ _)))
(Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _
(Set.mem_singleton _)))) hp₃p₄).1 hc₅₁₂₃₄
rw [Set.insert_comm] at hc₅₁₂ hc₅₃₄
have hs₁₅₂ := oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_collinear.2 hc₅₁₂
have hs₃₅₄ := oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_collinear.2 hc₅₃₄
rw [← Real.Angle.sign_eq_zero_iff] at hs₁₅₂ hs₃₅₄
rw [hs₁₅₂, hs₃₅₄]
· let s : Set (P × P × P) :=
(fun x : line[ℝ, p₁, p₂] × V => (x.1, p₅, x.2 +ᵥ (x.1 : P))) ''
Set.univ ×ˢ {v | SameRay ℝ (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) v ∧ v ≠ 0}
have hco : IsConnected s :=
haveI : ConnectedSpace line[ℝ, p₁, p₂] := AddTorsor.connectedSpace _ _
(isConnected_univ.prod (isConnected_setOf_sameRay_and_ne_zero
(vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁p₂.symm))).image _ (by fun_prop)
have hf : ContinuousOn (fun p : P × P × P => ∡ p.1 p.2.1 p.2.2) s := by
refine continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt fun p hp => continuousAt_oangle ?_ ?_
all_goals
simp_rw [s, Set.mem_image, Set.mem_prod, Set.mem_univ, true_and, Prod.ext_iff] at hp
obtain ⟨q₁, q₅, q₂⟩ := p
dsimp only at hp ⊢
obtain ⟨⟨⟨q, hq⟩, v⟩, hv, rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ := hp
dsimp only [Subtype.coe_mk, Set.mem_setOf] at hv ⊢
obtain ⟨hvr, -⟩ := hv
rintro rfl
refine hc₅₁₂ ((collinear_insert_iff_of_mem_affineSpan ?_).2 (collinear_pair _ _ _))
· exact hq
· refine vadd_mem_of_mem_direction ?_ hq
rw [← exists_nonneg_left_iff_sameRay (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁p₂.symm)] at hvr
obtain ⟨r, -, rfl⟩ := hvr
rw [direction_affineSpan]
exact smul_vsub_rev_mem_vectorSpan_pair _ _ _
have hsp : ∀ p : P × P × P, p ∈ s → ∡ p.1 p.2.1 p.2.2 ≠ 0 ∧ ∡ p.1 p.2.1 p.2.2 ≠ π := by
intro p hp
simp_rw [s, Set.mem_image, Set.mem_prod, Set.mem_setOf, Set.mem_univ, true_and,
Prod.ext_iff] at hp
obtain ⟨q₁, q₅, q₂⟩ := p
dsimp only at hp ⊢
obtain ⟨⟨⟨q, hq⟩, v⟩, hv, rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ := hp
dsimp only [Subtype.coe_mk, Set.mem_setOf] at hv ⊢
obtain ⟨hvr, hv0⟩ := hv
rw [← exists_nonneg_left_iff_sameRay (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁p₂.symm)] at hvr
obtain ⟨r, -, rfl⟩ := hvr
change q ∈ line[ℝ, p₁, p₂] at hq
rw [oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_affineIndependent]
refine affineIndependent_of_ne_of_mem_of_not_mem_of_mem ?_ hq
(fun h => hc₅₁₂ ((collinear_insert_iff_of_mem_affineSpan h).2 (collinear_pair _ _ _))) ?_
· rwa [← @vsub_ne_zero V, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vsub_self, zero_sub, neg_ne_zero]
· refine vadd_mem_of_mem_direction ?_ hq
rw [direction_affineSpan]
exact smul_vsub_rev_mem_vectorSpan_pair _ _ _
have hp₁p₂s : (p₁, p₅, p₂) ∈ s := by
simp_rw [s, Set.mem_image, Set.mem_prod, Set.mem_setOf, Set.mem_univ, true_and,
Prod.ext_iff]
refine ⟨⟨⟨p₁, left_mem_affineSpan_pair ℝ _ _⟩, p₂ -ᵥ p₁⟩,
⟨SameRay.rfl, vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁p₂.symm⟩, ?_⟩
simp
have hp₃p₄s : (p₃, p₅, p₄) ∈ s := by
simp_rw [s, Set.mem_image, Set.mem_prod, Set.mem_setOf, Set.mem_univ, true_and,
Prod.ext_iff]
refine ⟨⟨⟨p₃, hc.mem_affineSpan_of_mem_of_ne (Set.mem_insert _ _)
(Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_insert _ _))
(Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_insert _ _))) hp₁p₂⟩, p₄ -ᵥ p₃⟩,
⟨hr, vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃p₄.symm⟩, ?_⟩
simp
convert Real.Angle.sign_eq_of_continuousOn hco hf hsp hp₃p₄s hp₁p₂s
/-- Given three points in strict order on the same line, and a fourth point, the angles at the
fourth point between the first and second or second and third points have the same sign. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle_sign_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (p₄ : P) (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) :
(∡ p₁ p₄ p₂).sign = (∡ p₂ p₄ p₃).sign :=
haveI hc : Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₂, p₃} : Set P) := by simpa using h.wbtw.collinear
hc.oangle_sign_of_sameRay_vsub _ h.left_ne h.ne_right h.wbtw.sameRay_vsub
/-- Given three points in weak order on the same line, with the first not equal to the second,
and a fourth point, the angles at the fourth point between the first and second or first and
third points have the same sign. -/
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle_sign_eq_of_ne_left {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (p₄ : P) (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃)
(hne : p₁ ≠ p₂) : (∡ p₁ p₄ p₂).sign = (∡ p₁ p₄ p₃).sign :=
haveI hc : Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₁, p₃} : Set P) := by
simpa [Set.insert_comm p₂] using h.collinear
hc.oangle_sign_of_sameRay_vsub _ hne (h.left_ne_right_of_ne_left hne.symm) h.sameRay_vsub_left
/-- Given three points in strict order on the same line, and a fourth point, the angles at the
fourth point between the first and second or first and third points have the same sign. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle_sign_eq_left {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (p₄ : P) (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) :
(∡ p₁ p₄ p₂).sign = (∡ p₁ p₄ p₃).sign :=
h.wbtw.oangle_sign_eq_of_ne_left _ h.left_ne
/-- Given three points in weak order on the same line, with the second not equal to the third,
and a fourth point, the angles at the fourth point between the second and third or first and
third points have the same sign. -/
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle_sign_eq_of_ne_right {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (p₄ : P) (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃)
(hne : p₂ ≠ p₃) : (∡ p₂ p₄ p₃).sign = (∡ p₁ p₄ p₃).sign := by
simp_rw [oangle_rev p₃, Real.Angle.sign_neg, h.symm.oangle_sign_eq_of_ne_left _ hne.symm]
/-- Given three points in strict order on the same line, and a fourth point, the angles at the
fourth point between the second and third or first and third points have the same sign. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle_sign_eq_right {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (p₄ : P) (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) :
(∡ p₂ p₄ p₃).sign = (∡ p₁ p₄ p₃).sign :=
h.wbtw.oangle_sign_eq_of_ne_right _ h.ne_right
/-- Given two points in an affine subspace, the angles between those two points at two other
points on the same side of that subspace have the same sign. -/
theorem _root_.AffineSubspace.SSameSide.oangle_sign_eq {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ : P}
(hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s) (hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) (hp₃p₄ : s.SSameSide p₃ p₄) :
(∡ p₁ p₄ p₂).sign = (∡ p₁ p₃ p₂).sign := by
by_cases h : p₁ = p₂; · simp [h]
let sp : Set (P × P × P) := (fun p : P => (p₁, p, p₂)) '' {p | s.SSameSide p₃ p}
have hc : IsConnected sp :=
(isConnected_setOf_sSameSide hp₃p₄.2.1 hp₃p₄.nonempty).image _ (by fun_prop)
have hf : ContinuousOn (fun p : P × P × P => ∡ p.1 p.2.1 p.2.2) sp := by
refine continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt fun p hp => continuousAt_oangle ?_ ?_
all_goals
simp_rw [sp, Set.mem_image, Set.mem_setOf] at hp
obtain ⟨p', hp', rfl⟩ := hp
dsimp only
rintro rfl
· exact hp'.2.2 hp₁
· exact hp'.2.2 hp₂
have hsp : ∀ p : P × P × P, p ∈ sp → ∡ p.1 p.2.1 p.2.2 ≠ 0 ∧ ∡ p.1 p.2.1 p.2.2 ≠ π := by
intro p hp
simp_rw [sp, Set.mem_image, Set.mem_setOf] at hp
obtain ⟨p', hp', rfl⟩ := hp
dsimp only
rw [oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_affineIndependent]
exact affineIndependent_of_ne_of_mem_of_not_mem_of_mem h hp₁ hp'.2.2 hp₂
have hp₃ : (p₁, p₃, p₂) ∈ sp :=
Set.mem_image_of_mem _ (sSameSide_self_iff.2 ⟨hp₃p₄.nonempty, hp₃p₄.2.1⟩)
have hp₄ : (p₁, p₄, p₂) ∈ sp := Set.mem_image_of_mem _ hp₃p₄
convert Real.Angle.sign_eq_of_continuousOn hc hf hsp hp₃ hp₄
/-- Given two points in an affine subspace, the angles between those two points at two other
points on opposite sides of that subspace have opposite signs. -/
theorem _root_.AffineSubspace.SOppSide.oangle_sign_eq_neg {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ : P}
(hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s) (hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) (hp₃p₄ : s.SOppSide p₃ p₄) :
(∡ p₁ p₄ p₂).sign = -(∡ p₁ p₃ p₂).sign := by
have hp₁p₃ : p₁ ≠ p₃ := by rintro rfl; exact hp₃p₄.left_not_mem hp₁
rw [← (hp₃p₄.symm.trans (sOppSide_pointReflection hp₁ hp₃p₄.left_not_mem)).oangle_sign_eq hp₁ hp₂,
← oangle_rotate_sign p₁, ← oangle_rotate_sign p₁, oangle_swap₁₃_sign,
(sbtw_pointReflection_of_ne ℝ hp₁p₃).symm.oangle_sign_eq _]
end EuclideanGeometry
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/Affine.lean | 808 | 834 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Reid Barton, Mario Carneiro, Kim Morrison, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Category.ULift
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EssentiallySmall
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.EpiMono
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Basic
/-!
# Existence of limits and colimits
In `CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit` we defined `IsLimit c`,
the data showing that a cone `c` is a limit cone.
The two main structures defined in this file are:
* `LimitCone F`, which consists of a choice of cone for `F` and the fact it is a limit cone, and
* `HasLimit F`, asserting the mere existence of some limit cone for `F`.
`HasLimit` is a propositional typeclass
(it's important that it is a proposition merely asserting the existence of a limit,
as otherwise we would have non-defeq problems from incompatible instances).
While `HasLimit` only asserts the existence of a limit cone,
we happily use the axiom of choice in mathlib,
so there are convenience functions all depending on `HasLimit F`:
* `limit F : C`, producing some limit object (of course all such are isomorphic)
* `limit.π F j : limit F ⟶ F.obj j`, the morphisms out of the limit,
* `limit.lift F c : c.pt ⟶ limit F`, the universal morphism from any other `c : Cone F`, etc.
Key to using the `HasLimit` interface is that there is an `@[ext]` lemma stating that
to check `f = g`, for `f g : Z ⟶ limit F`, it suffices to check `f ≫ limit.π F j = g ≫ limit.π F j`
for every `j`.
This, combined with `@[simp]` lemmas, makes it possible to prove many easy facts about limits using
automation (e.g. `tidy`).
There are abbreviations `HasLimitsOfShape J C` and `HasLimits C`
asserting the existence of classes of limits.
Later more are introduced, for finite limits, special shapes of limits, etc.
Ideally, many results about limits should be stated first in terms of `IsLimit`,
and then a result in terms of `HasLimit` derived from this.
At this point, however, this is far from uniformly achieved in mathlib ---
often statements are only written in terms of `HasLimit`.
## Implementation
At present we simply say everything twice, in order to handle both limits and colimits.
It would be highly desirable to have some automation support,
e.g. a `@[dualize]` attribute that behaves similarly to `@[to_additive]`.
## References
* [Stacks: Limits and colimits](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/002D)
-/
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Functor Opposite
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
-- morphism levels before object levels. See note [CategoryTheory universes].
universe v₁ u₁ v₂ u₂ v₃ u₃ v v' v'' u u' u''
variable {J : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J] {K : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} K]
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable {F : J ⥤ C}
section Limit
/-- `LimitCone F` contains a cone over `F` together with the information that it is a limit. -/
structure LimitCone (F : J ⥤ C) where
/-- The cone itself -/
cone : Cone F
/-- The proof that is the limit cone -/
isLimit : IsLimit cone
/-- `HasLimit F` represents the mere existence of a limit for `F`. -/
class HasLimit (F : J ⥤ C) : Prop where mk' ::
/-- There is some limit cone for `F` -/
exists_limit : Nonempty (LimitCone F)
theorem HasLimit.mk {F : J ⥤ C} (d : LimitCone F) : HasLimit F :=
⟨Nonempty.intro d⟩
/-- Use the axiom of choice to extract explicit `LimitCone F` from `HasLimit F`. -/
def getLimitCone (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] : LimitCone F :=
Classical.choice <| HasLimit.exists_limit
variable (J C)
/-- `C` has limits of shape `J` if there exists a limit for every functor `F : J ⥤ C`. -/
class HasLimitsOfShape : Prop where
/-- All functors `F : J ⥤ C` from `J` have limits -/
has_limit : ∀ F : J ⥤ C, HasLimit F := by infer_instance
/-- `C` has all limits of size `v₁ u₁` (`HasLimitsOfSize.{v₁ u₁} C`)
if it has limits of every shape `J : Type u₁` with `[Category.{v₁} J]`.
-/
@[pp_with_univ]
class HasLimitsOfSize (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] : Prop where
/-- All functors `F : J ⥤ C` from all small `J` have limits -/
has_limits_of_shape : ∀ (J : Type u₁) [Category.{v₁} J], HasLimitsOfShape J C := by
infer_instance
/-- `C` has all (small) limits if it has limits of every shape that is as big as its hom-sets. -/
abbrev HasLimits (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] : Prop :=
HasLimitsOfSize.{v, v} C
theorem HasLimits.has_limits_of_shape {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [HasLimits C] (J : Type v)
[Category.{v} J] : HasLimitsOfShape J C :=
HasLimitsOfSize.has_limits_of_shape J
variable {J C}
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) hasLimitOfHasLimitsOfShape {J : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J]
[HasLimitsOfShape J C] (F : J ⥤ C) : HasLimit F :=
HasLimitsOfShape.has_limit F
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) hasLimitsOfShapeOfHasLimits {J : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J]
[HasLimitsOfSize.{v₁, u₁} C] : HasLimitsOfShape J C :=
HasLimitsOfSize.has_limits_of_shape J
-- Interface to the `HasLimit` class.
/-- An arbitrary choice of limit cone for a functor. -/
def limit.cone (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] : Cone F :=
(getLimitCone F).cone
/-- An arbitrary choice of limit object of a functor. -/
def limit (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] :=
(limit.cone F).pt
/-- The projection from the limit object to a value of the functor. -/
def limit.π (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] (j : J) : limit F ⟶ F.obj j :=
(limit.cone F).π.app j
@[reassoc]
theorem limit.π_comp_eqToHom (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] {j j' : J} (hj : j = j') :
limit.π F j ≫ eqToHom (by subst hj; rfl) = limit.π F j' := by
subst hj
simp
@[simp]
theorem limit.cone_x {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] : (limit.cone F).pt = limit F :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem limit.cone_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] : (limit.cone F).π.app = limit.π _ :=
rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.w (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] {j j' : J} (f : j ⟶ j') :
limit.π F j ≫ F.map f = limit.π F j' :=
(limit.cone F).w f
/-- Evidence that the arbitrary choice of cone provided by `limit.cone F` is a limit cone. -/
def limit.isLimit (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] : IsLimit (limit.cone F) :=
(getLimitCone F).isLimit
/-- The morphism from the cone point of any other cone to the limit object. -/
def limit.lift (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) : c.pt ⟶ limit F :=
(limit.isLimit F).lift c
@[simp]
theorem limit.isLimit_lift {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) :
(limit.isLimit F).lift c = limit.lift F c :=
rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.lift_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) (j : J) :
limit.lift F c ≫ limit.π F j = c.π.app j :=
IsLimit.fac _ c j
/-- Functoriality of limits.
Usually this morphism should be accessed through `lim.map`,
but may be needed separately when you have specified limits for the source and target functors,
but not necessarily for all functors of shape `J`.
-/
def limMap {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (α : F ⟶ G) : limit F ⟶ limit G :=
IsLimit.map _ (limit.isLimit G) α
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limMap_π {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (α : F ⟶ G) (j : J) :
limMap α ≫ limit.π G j = limit.π F j ≫ α.app j :=
limit.lift_π _ j
/-- The cone morphism from any cone to the arbitrary choice of limit cone. -/
def limit.coneMorphism {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) : c ⟶ limit.cone F :=
(limit.isLimit F).liftConeMorphism c
@[simp]
theorem limit.coneMorphism_hom {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) :
(limit.coneMorphism c).hom = limit.lift F c :=
rfl
theorem limit.coneMorphism_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) (j : J) :
(limit.coneMorphism c).hom ≫ limit.π F j = c.π.app j := by simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_hom_comp {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {c : Cone F} (hc : IsLimit c)
(j : J) : (IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso hc (limit.isLimit _)).hom ≫ limit.π F j = c.π.app j :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_hom_comp _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {c : Cone F} (hc : IsLimit c)
(j : J) : (IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (limit.isLimit _) hc).inv ≫ limit.π F j = c.π.app j :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp _ _ _
theorem limit.existsUnique {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (t : Cone F) :
∃! l : t.pt ⟶ limit F, ∀ j, l ≫ limit.π F j = t.π.app j :=
(limit.isLimit F).existsUnique _
/-- Given any other limit cone for `F`, the chosen `limit F` is isomorphic to the cone point.
-/
def limit.isoLimitCone {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (t : LimitCone F) : limit F ≅ t.cone.pt :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (limit.isLimit F) t.isLimit
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.isoLimitCone_hom_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (t : LimitCone F) (j : J) :
(limit.isoLimitCone t).hom ≫ t.cone.π.app j = limit.π F j := by
dsimp [limit.isoLimitCone, IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso]
simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.isoLimitCone_inv_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (t : LimitCone F) (j : J) :
(limit.isoLimitCone t).inv ≫ limit.π F j = t.cone.π.app j := by
dsimp [limit.isoLimitCone, IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso]
simp
@[ext]
theorem limit.hom_ext {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {X : C} {f f' : X ⟶ limit F}
(w : ∀ j, f ≫ limit.π F j = f' ≫ limit.π F j) : f = f' :=
(limit.isLimit F).hom_ext w
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.lift_map {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (c : Cone F) (α : F ⟶ G) :
limit.lift F c ≫ limMap α = limit.lift G ((Cones.postcompose α).obj c) := by
ext
rw [assoc, limMap_π, limit.lift_π_assoc, limit.lift_π]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem limit.lift_cone {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] : limit.lift F (limit.cone F) = 𝟙 (limit F) :=
(limit.isLimit _).lift_self
/-- The isomorphism (in `Type`) between
morphisms from a specified object `W` to the limit object,
and cones with cone point `W`.
-/
def limit.homIso (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] (W : C) :
ULift.{u₁} (W ⟶ limit F : Type v) ≅ F.cones.obj (op W) :=
(limit.isLimit F).homIso W
@[simp]
theorem limit.homIso_hom (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] {W : C} (f : ULift (W ⟶ limit F)) :
(limit.homIso F W).hom f = (const J).map f.down ≫ (limit.cone F).π :=
(limit.isLimit F).homIso_hom f
/-- The isomorphism (in `Type`) between
morphisms from a specified object `W` to the limit object,
and an explicit componentwise description of cones with cone point `W`.
-/
def limit.homIso' (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] (W : C) :
ULift.{u₁} (W ⟶ limit F : Type v) ≅
{ p : ∀ j, W ⟶ F.obj j // ∀ {j j' : J} (f : j ⟶ j'), p j ≫ F.map f = p j' } :=
(limit.isLimit F).homIso' W
theorem limit.lift_extend {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) {X : C} (f : X ⟶ c.pt) :
limit.lift F (c.extend f) = f ≫ limit.lift F c := by aesop_cat
/-- If a functor `F` has a limit, so does any naturally isomorphic functor.
-/
theorem hasLimit_of_iso {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (α : F ≅ G) : HasLimit G :=
HasLimit.mk
{ cone := (Cones.postcompose α.hom).obj (limit.cone F)
isLimit := (IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv _ _).symm (limit.isLimit F) }
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-03")] alias hasLimitOfIso := hasLimit_of_iso
theorem hasLimit_iff_of_iso {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ≅ G) : HasLimit F ↔ HasLimit G :=
⟨fun _ ↦ hasLimit_of_iso α, fun _ ↦ hasLimit_of_iso α.symm⟩
-- See the construction of limits from products and equalizers
-- for an example usage.
/-- If a functor `G` has the same collection of cones as a functor `F`
which has a limit, then `G` also has a limit. -/
theorem HasLimit.ofConesIso {J K : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J] [Category.{v₂} K] (F : J ⥤ C)
(G : K ⥤ C) (h : F.cones ≅ G.cones) [HasLimit F] : HasLimit G :=
HasLimit.mk ⟨_, IsLimit.ofNatIso (IsLimit.natIso (limit.isLimit F) ≪≫ h)⟩
/-- The limits of `F : J ⥤ C` and `G : J ⥤ C` are isomorphic,
if the functors are naturally isomorphic.
-/
def HasLimit.isoOfNatIso {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (w : F ≅ G) : limit F ≅ limit G :=
IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfNatIso (limit.isLimit F) (limit.isLimit G) w
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem HasLimit.isoOfNatIso_hom_π {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (w : F ≅ G) (j : J) :
(HasLimit.isoOfNatIso w).hom ≫ limit.π G j = limit.π F j ≫ w.hom.app j :=
IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfNatIso_hom_comp _ _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem HasLimit.isoOfNatIso_inv_π {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (w : F ≅ G) (j : J) :
(HasLimit.isoOfNatIso w).inv ≫ limit.π F j = limit.π G j ≫ w.inv.app j :=
IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfNatIso_inv_comp _ _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem HasLimit.lift_isoOfNatIso_hom {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (t : Cone F)
(w : F ≅ G) :
limit.lift F t ≫ (HasLimit.isoOfNatIso w).hom =
limit.lift G ((Cones.postcompose w.hom).obj _) :=
IsLimit.lift_comp_conePointsIsoOfNatIso_hom _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem HasLimit.lift_isoOfNatIso_inv {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (t : Cone G)
(w : F ≅ G) :
limit.lift G t ≫ (HasLimit.isoOfNatIso w).inv =
limit.lift F ((Cones.postcompose w.inv).obj _) :=
IsLimit.lift_comp_conePointsIsoOfNatIso_inv _ _ _
/-- The limits of `F : J ⥤ C` and `G : K ⥤ C` are isomorphic,
if there is an equivalence `e : J ≌ K` making the triangle commute up to natural isomorphism.
-/
def HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {G : K ⥤ C} [HasLimit G] (e : J ≌ K)
(w : e.functor ⋙ G ≅ F) : limit F ≅ limit G :=
IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfEquivalence (limit.isLimit F) (limit.isLimit G) e w
@[simp]
theorem HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence_hom_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {G : K ⥤ C} [HasLimit G]
(e : J ≌ K) (w : e.functor ⋙ G ≅ F) (k : K) :
(HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence e w).hom ≫ limit.π G k =
limit.π F (e.inverse.obj k) ≫ w.inv.app (e.inverse.obj k) ≫ G.map (e.counit.app k) := by
simp only [HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence, IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfEquivalence_hom]
dsimp
simp
@[simp]
theorem HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence_inv_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {G : K ⥤ C} [HasLimit G]
(e : J ≌ K) (w : e.functor ⋙ G ≅ F) (j : J) :
(HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence e w).inv ≫ limit.π F j =
limit.π G (e.functor.obj j) ≫ w.hom.app j := by
simp only [HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence, IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfEquivalence_hom]
dsimp
simp
section Pre
variable (F)
variable [HasLimit F] (E : K ⥤ J) [HasLimit (E ⋙ F)]
/-- The canonical morphism from the limit of `F` to the limit of `E ⋙ F`.
-/
def limit.pre : limit F ⟶ limit (E ⋙ F) :=
limit.lift (E ⋙ F) ((limit.cone F).whisker E)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.pre_π (k : K) : limit.pre F E ≫ limit.π (E ⋙ F) k = limit.π F (E.obj k) := by
erw [IsLimit.fac]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem limit.lift_pre (c : Cone F) :
limit.lift F c ≫ limit.pre F E = limit.lift (E ⋙ F) (c.whisker E) := by ext; simp
variable {L : Type u₃} [Category.{v₃} L]
variable (D : L ⥤ K)
@[simp]
theorem limit.pre_pre [h : HasLimit (D ⋙ E ⋙ F)] : haveI : HasLimit ((D ⋙ E) ⋙ F) := h
limit.pre F E ≫ limit.pre (E ⋙ F) D = limit.pre F (D ⋙ E) := by
haveI : HasLimit ((D ⋙ E) ⋙ F) := h
ext j; erw [assoc, limit.pre_π, limit.pre_π, limit.pre_π]; rfl
variable {E F}
/-- -
If we have particular limit cones available for `E ⋙ F` and for `F`,
we obtain a formula for `limit.pre F E`.
-/
theorem limit.pre_eq (s : LimitCone (E ⋙ F)) (t : LimitCone F) :
limit.pre F E = (limit.isoLimitCone t).hom ≫ s.isLimit.lift (t.cone.whisker E) ≫
(limit.isoLimitCone s).inv := by aesop_cat
end Pre
section Post
variable {D : Type u'} [Category.{v'} D]
variable (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] (G : C ⥤ D) [HasLimit (F ⋙ G)]
/-- The canonical morphism from `G` applied to the limit of `F` to the limit of `F ⋙ G`.
-/
def limit.post : G.obj (limit F) ⟶ limit (F ⋙ G) :=
limit.lift (F ⋙ G) (G.mapCone (limit.cone F))
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.post_π (j : J) : limit.post F G ≫ limit.π (F ⋙ G) j = G.map (limit.π F j) := by
erw [IsLimit.fac]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem limit.lift_post (c : Cone F) :
G.map (limit.lift F c) ≫ limit.post F G = limit.lift (F ⋙ G) (G.mapCone c) := by
ext
rw [assoc, limit.post_π, ← G.map_comp, limit.lift_π, limit.lift_π]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem limit.post_post {E : Type u''} [Category.{v''} E] (H : D ⥤ E) [h : HasLimit ((F ⋙ G) ⋙ H)] :
-- H G (limit F) ⟶ H (limit (F ⋙ G)) ⟶ limit ((F ⋙ G) ⋙ H) equals
-- H G (limit F) ⟶ limit (F ⋙ (G ⋙ H))
haveI : HasLimit (F ⋙ G ⋙ H) := h
H.map (limit.post F G) ≫ limit.post (F ⋙ G) H = limit.post F (G ⋙ H) := by
haveI : HasLimit (F ⋙ G ⋙ H) := h
ext; erw [assoc, limit.post_π, ← H.map_comp, limit.post_π, limit.post_π]; rfl
end Post
theorem limit.pre_post {D : Type u'} [Category.{v'} D] (E : K ⥤ J) (F : J ⥤ C) (G : C ⥤ D)
[HasLimit F] [HasLimit (E ⋙ F)] [HasLimit (F ⋙ G)]
[h : HasLimit ((E ⋙ F) ⋙ G)] :-- G (limit F) ⟶ G (limit (E ⋙ F)) ⟶ limit ((E ⋙ F) ⋙ G) vs
-- G (limit F) ⟶ limit F ⋙ G ⟶ limit (E ⋙ (F ⋙ G)) or
haveI : HasLimit (E ⋙ F ⋙ G) := h
G.map (limit.pre F E) ≫ limit.post (E ⋙ F) G = limit.post F G ≫ limit.pre (F ⋙ G) E := by
haveI : HasLimit (E ⋙ F ⋙ G) := h
ext; erw [assoc, limit.post_π, ← G.map_comp, limit.pre_π, assoc, limit.pre_π, limit.post_π]
open CategoryTheory.Equivalence
instance hasLimitEquivalenceComp (e : K ≌ J) [HasLimit F] : HasLimit (e.functor ⋙ F) :=
HasLimit.mk
{ cone := Cone.whisker e.functor (limit.cone F)
isLimit := IsLimit.whiskerEquivalence (limit.isLimit F) e }
-- not entirely sure why this is needed
/-- If a `E ⋙ F` has a limit, and `E` is an equivalence, we can construct a limit of `F`.
-/
theorem hasLimitOfEquivalenceComp (e : K ≌ J) [HasLimit (e.functor ⋙ F)] : HasLimit F := by
haveI : HasLimit (e.inverse ⋙ e.functor ⋙ F) := Limits.hasLimitEquivalenceComp e.symm
apply hasLimit_of_iso (e.invFunIdAssoc F)
-- `hasLimitCompEquivalence` and `hasLimitOfCompEquivalence`
-- are proved in `CategoryTheory/Adjunction/Limits.lean`.
section LimFunctor
variable [HasLimitsOfShape J C]
section
/-- `limit F` is functorial in `F`, when `C` has all limits of shape `J`. -/
@[simps]
def lim : (J ⥤ C) ⥤ C where
obj F := limit F
map α := limMap α
map_id F := by
apply Limits.limit.hom_ext; intro j
simp
map_comp α β := by
apply Limits.limit.hom_ext; intro j
simp [assoc]
end
variable {G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ G)
theorem limMap_eq : limMap α = lim.map α := rfl
theorem limit.map_pre [HasLimitsOfShape K C] (E : K ⥤ J) :
lim.map α ≫ limit.pre G E = limit.pre F E ≫ lim.map (whiskerLeft E α) := by
ext
simp
theorem limit.map_pre' [HasLimitsOfShape K C] (F : J ⥤ C) {E₁ E₂ : K ⥤ J} (α : E₁ ⟶ E₂) :
limit.pre F E₂ = limit.pre F E₁ ≫ lim.map (whiskerRight α F) := by
ext1; simp [← category.assoc]
theorem limit.id_pre (F : J ⥤ C) : limit.pre F (𝟭 _) = lim.map (Functor.leftUnitor F).inv := by
aesop_cat
theorem limit.map_post {D : Type u'} [Category.{v'} D] [HasLimitsOfShape J D] (H : C ⥤ D) :
/- H (limit F) ⟶ H (limit G) ⟶ limit (G ⋙ H) vs
H (limit F) ⟶ limit (F ⋙ H) ⟶ limit (G ⋙ H) -/
H.map (limMap α) ≫ limit.post G H = limit.post F H ≫ limMap (whiskerRight α H) := by
ext
simp only [whiskerRight_app, limMap_π, assoc, limit.post_π_assoc, limit.post_π, ← H.map_comp]
/-- The isomorphism between
morphisms from `W` to the cone point of the limit cone for `F`
and cones over `F` with cone point `W`
is natural in `F`.
-/
def limYoneda :
lim ⋙ yoneda ⋙ (whiskeringRight _ _ _).obj uliftFunctor.{u₁} ≅ CategoryTheory.cones J C :=
NatIso.ofComponents fun F => NatIso.ofComponents fun W => limit.homIso F (unop W)
/-- The constant functor and limit functor are adjoint to each other -/
def constLimAdj : (const J : C ⥤ J ⥤ C) ⊣ lim := Adjunction.mk' {
homEquiv := fun c g ↦
{ toFun := fun f => limit.lift _ ⟨c, f⟩
invFun := fun f =>
{ app := fun _ => f ≫ limit.π _ _ }
left_inv := by aesop_cat
right_inv := by aesop_cat }
unit := { app := fun _ => limit.lift _ ⟨_, 𝟙 _⟩ }
counit := { app := fun g => { app := limit.π _ } } }
instance : IsRightAdjoint (lim : (J ⥤ C) ⥤ C) :=
⟨_, ⟨constLimAdj⟩⟩
end LimFunctor
instance limMap_mono' {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimitsOfShape J C] (α : F ⟶ G) [Mono α] : Mono (limMap α) :=
(lim : (J ⥤ C) ⥤ C).map_mono α
instance limMap_mono {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (α : F ⟶ G) [∀ j, Mono (α.app j)] :
Mono (limMap α) :=
⟨fun {Z} u v h =>
limit.hom_ext fun j => (cancel_mono (α.app j)).1 <| by simpa using h =≫ limit.π _ j⟩
section Adjunction
variable {L : (J ⥤ C) ⥤ C} (adj : Functor.const _ ⊣ L)
/- The fact that the existence of limits of shape `J` is equivalent to the existence
of a right adjoint to the constant functor `C ⥤ (J ⥤ C)` is obtained in
the file `Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.ConeCategory`: see the lemma
`hasLimitsOfShape_iff_isLeftAdjoint_const`. In the definitions below, given an
adjunction `adj : Functor.const _ ⊣ (L : (J ⥤ C) ⥤ C)`, we directly construct
a limit cone for any `F : J ⥤ C`. -/
/-- The limit cone obtained from a right adjoint of the constant functor. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def coneOfAdj (F : J ⥤ C) : Cone F where
pt := L.obj F
π := adj.counit.app F
/-- The cones defined by `coneOfAdj` are limit cones. -/
@[simps]
def isLimitConeOfAdj (F : J ⥤ C) :
IsLimit (coneOfAdj adj F) where
lift s := adj.homEquiv _ _ s.π
fac s j := by
have eq := NatTrans.congr_app (adj.counit.naturality s.π) j
have eq' := NatTrans.congr_app (adj.left_triangle_components s.pt) j
dsimp at eq eq' ⊢
rw [adj.homEquiv_unit, assoc, eq, reassoc_of% eq']
uniq s m hm := (adj.homEquiv _ _).symm.injective (by ext j; simpa using hm j)
end Adjunction
/-- We can transport limits of shape `J` along an equivalence `J ≌ J'`.
-/
theorem hasLimitsOfShape_of_equivalence {J' : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} J'] (e : J ≌ J')
[HasLimitsOfShape J C] : HasLimitsOfShape J' C := by
constructor
intro F
apply hasLimitOfEquivalenceComp e
variable (C)
/-- A category that has larger limits also has smaller limits. -/
theorem hasLimitsOfSizeOfUnivLE [UnivLE.{v₂, v₁}] [UnivLE.{u₂, u₁}]
[HasLimitsOfSize.{v₁, u₁} C] : HasLimitsOfSize.{v₂, u₂} C where
has_limits_of_shape J {_} := hasLimitsOfShape_of_equivalence
((ShrinkHoms.equivalence J).trans <| Shrink.equivalence _).symm
/-- `hasLimitsOfSizeShrink.{v u} C` tries to obtain `HasLimitsOfSize.{v u} C`
from some other `HasLimitsOfSize C`.
-/
theorem hasLimitsOfSizeShrink [HasLimitsOfSize.{max v₁ v₂, max u₁ u₂} C] :
HasLimitsOfSize.{v₁, u₁} C := hasLimitsOfSizeOfUnivLE.{max v₁ v₂, max u₁ u₂} C
instance (priority := 100) hasSmallestLimitsOfHasLimits [HasLimits C] : HasLimitsOfSize.{0, 0} C :=
hasLimitsOfSizeShrink.{0, 0} C
end Limit
section Colimit
/-- `ColimitCocone F` contains a cocone over `F` together with the information that it is a
colimit. -/
structure ColimitCocone (F : J ⥤ C) where
/-- The cocone itself -/
cocone : Cocone F
/-- The proof that it is the colimit cocone -/
isColimit : IsColimit cocone
/-- `HasColimit F` represents the mere existence of a colimit for `F`. -/
class HasColimit (F : J ⥤ C) : Prop where mk' ::
/-- There exists a colimit for `F` -/
exists_colimit : Nonempty (ColimitCocone F)
theorem HasColimit.mk {F : J ⥤ C} (d : ColimitCocone F) : HasColimit F :=
⟨Nonempty.intro d⟩
/-- Use the axiom of choice to extract explicit `ColimitCocone F` from `HasColimit F`. -/
def getColimitCocone (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F] : ColimitCocone F :=
Classical.choice <| HasColimit.exists_colimit
variable (J C)
/-- `C` has colimits of shape `J` if there exists a colimit for every functor `F : J ⥤ C`. -/
class HasColimitsOfShape : Prop where
/-- All `F : J ⥤ C` have colimits for a fixed `J` -/
has_colimit : ∀ F : J ⥤ C, HasColimit F := by infer_instance
/-- `C` has all colimits of size `v₁ u₁` (`HasColimitsOfSize.{v₁ u₁} C`)
if it has colimits of every shape `J : Type u₁` with `[Category.{v₁} J]`.
-/
@[pp_with_univ]
class HasColimitsOfSize (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] : Prop where
/-- All `F : J ⥤ C` have colimits for all small `J` -/
has_colimits_of_shape : ∀ (J : Type u₁) [Category.{v₁} J], HasColimitsOfShape J C := by
infer_instance
/-- `C` has all (small) colimits if it has colimits of every shape that is as big as its hom-sets.
-/
abbrev HasColimits (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] : Prop :=
HasColimitsOfSize.{v, v} C
theorem HasColimits.hasColimitsOfShape {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [HasColimits C] (J : Type v)
[Category.{v} J] : HasColimitsOfShape J C :=
HasColimitsOfSize.has_colimits_of_shape J
variable {J C}
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) hasColimitOfHasColimitsOfShape {J : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J]
[HasColimitsOfShape J C] (F : J ⥤ C) : HasColimit F :=
HasColimitsOfShape.has_colimit F
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) hasColimitsOfShapeOfHasColimitsOfSize {J : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J]
[HasColimitsOfSize.{v₁, u₁} C] : HasColimitsOfShape J C :=
HasColimitsOfSize.has_colimits_of_shape J
-- Interface to the `HasColimit` class.
/-- An arbitrary choice of colimit cocone of a functor. -/
def colimit.cocone (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F] : Cocone F :=
(getColimitCocone F).cocone
/-- An arbitrary choice of colimit object of a functor. -/
def colimit (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F] :=
(colimit.cocone F).pt
/-- The coprojection from a value of the functor to the colimit object. -/
def colimit.ι (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F] (j : J) : F.obj j ⟶ colimit F :=
(colimit.cocone F).ι.app j
@[reassoc]
theorem colimit.eqToHom_comp_ι (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F] {j j' : J} (hj : j = j') :
eqToHom (by subst hj; rfl) ≫ colimit.ι F j = colimit.ι F j' := by
subst hj
simp
@[simp]
theorem colimit.cocone_ι {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] (j : J) :
(colimit.cocone F).ι.app j = colimit.ι _ j :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem colimit.cocone_x {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] : (colimit.cocone F).pt = colimit F :=
rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem colimit.w (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F] {j j' : J} (f : j ⟶ j') :
F.map f ≫ colimit.ι F j' = colimit.ι F j :=
(colimit.cocone F).w f
/-- Evidence that the arbitrary choice of cocone is a colimit cocone. -/
def colimit.isColimit (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F] : IsColimit (colimit.cocone F) :=
(getColimitCocone F).isColimit
/-- The morphism from the colimit object to the cone point of any other cocone. -/
def colimit.desc (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F] (c : Cocone F) : colimit F ⟶ c.pt :=
(colimit.isColimit F).desc c
@[simp]
theorem colimit.isColimit_desc {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] (c : Cocone F) :
(colimit.isColimit F).desc c = colimit.desc F c :=
rfl
/-- We have lots of lemmas describing how to simplify `colimit.ι F j ≫ _`,
and combined with `colimit.ext` we rely on these lemmas for many calculations.
However, since `Category.assoc` is a `@[simp]` lemma, often expressions are
right associated, and it's hard to apply these lemmas about `colimit.ι`.
We thus use `reassoc` to define additional `@[simp]` lemmas, with an arbitrary extra morphism.
(see `Tactic/reassoc_axiom.lean`)
-/
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem colimit.ι_desc {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] (c : Cocone F) (j : J) :
colimit.ι F j ≫ colimit.desc F c = c.ι.app j :=
IsColimit.fac _ c j
/-- Functoriality of colimits.
Usually this morphism should be accessed through `colim.map`,
but may be needed separately when you have specified colimits for the source and target functors,
but not necessarily for all functors of shape `J`.
-/
def colimMap {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] [HasColimit G] (α : F ⟶ G) : colimit F ⟶ colimit G :=
IsColimit.map (colimit.isColimit F) _ α
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem ι_colimMap {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] [HasColimit G] (α : F ⟶ G) (j : J) :
colimit.ι F j ≫ colimMap α = α.app j ≫ colimit.ι G j :=
colimit.ι_desc _ j
/-- The cocone morphism from the arbitrary choice of colimit cocone to any cocone. -/
def colimit.coconeMorphism {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] (c : Cocone F) : colimit.cocone F ⟶ c :=
(colimit.isColimit F).descCoconeMorphism c
@[simp]
theorem colimit.coconeMorphism_hom {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] (c : Cocone F) :
(colimit.coconeMorphism c).hom = colimit.desc F c :=
rfl
theorem colimit.ι_coconeMorphism {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] (c : Cocone F) (j : J) :
colimit.ι F j ≫ (colimit.coconeMorphism c).hom = c.ι.app j := by simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem colimit.comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_hom {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] {c : Cocone F}
(hc : IsColimit c) (j : J) :
colimit.ι F j ≫ (IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit _) hc).hom = c.ι.app j :=
IsColimit.comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_hom _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem colimit.comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_inv {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] {c : Cocone F}
(hc : IsColimit c) (j : J) :
colimit.ι F j ≫ (IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso hc (colimit.isColimit _)).inv = c.ι.app j :=
IsColimit.comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_inv _ _ _
theorem colimit.existsUnique {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] (t : Cocone F) :
∃! d : colimit F ⟶ t.pt, ∀ j, colimit.ι F j ≫ d = t.ι.app j :=
(colimit.isColimit F).existsUnique _
/--
Given any other colimit cocone for `F`, the chosen `colimit F` is isomorphic to the cocone point.
-/
def colimit.isoColimitCocone {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] (t : ColimitCocone F) :
colimit F ≅ t.cocone.pt :=
IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit F) t.isColimit
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem colimit.isoColimitCocone_ι_hom {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] (t : ColimitCocone F) (j : J) :
colimit.ι F j ≫ (colimit.isoColimitCocone t).hom = t.cocone.ι.app j := by
dsimp [colimit.isoColimitCocone, IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso]
simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem colimit.isoColimitCocone_ι_inv {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] (t : ColimitCocone F) (j : J) :
t.cocone.ι.app j ≫ (colimit.isoColimitCocone t).inv = colimit.ι F j := by
dsimp [colimit.isoColimitCocone, IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso]
simp
@[ext]
theorem colimit.hom_ext {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] {X : C} {f f' : colimit F ⟶ X}
(w : ∀ j, colimit.ι F j ≫ f = colimit.ι F j ≫ f') : f = f' :=
(colimit.isColimit F).hom_ext w
@[simp]
theorem colimit.desc_cocone {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] :
colimit.desc F (colimit.cocone F) = 𝟙 (colimit F) :=
(colimit.isColimit _).desc_self
/-- The isomorphism (in `Type`) between
morphisms from the colimit object to a specified object `W`,
and cocones with cone point `W`.
-/
def colimit.homIso (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F] (W : C) :
ULift.{u₁} (colimit F ⟶ W : Type v) ≅ F.cocones.obj W :=
(colimit.isColimit F).homIso W
@[simp]
theorem colimit.homIso_hom (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F] {W : C} (f : ULift (colimit F ⟶ W)) :
(colimit.homIso F W).hom f = (colimit.cocone F).ι ≫ (const J).map f.down :=
(colimit.isColimit F).homIso_hom f
/-- The isomorphism (in `Type`) between
morphisms from the colimit object to a specified object `W`,
and an explicit componentwise description of cocones with cone point `W`.
-/
def colimit.homIso' (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F] (W : C) :
ULift.{u₁} (colimit F ⟶ W : Type v) ≅
{ p : ∀ j, F.obj j ⟶ W // ∀ {j j'} (f : j ⟶ j'), F.map f ≫ p j' = p j } :=
(colimit.isColimit F).homIso' W
theorem colimit.desc_extend (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F] (c : Cocone F) {X : C} (f : c.pt ⟶ X) :
colimit.desc F (c.extend f) = colimit.desc F c ≫ f := by ext1; rw [← Category.assoc]; simp
-- This has the isomorphism pointing in the opposite direction than in `has_limit_of_iso`.
-- This is intentional; it seems to help with elaboration.
/-- If `F` has a colimit, so does any naturally isomorphic functor.
-/
theorem hasColimit_of_iso {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] (α : G ≅ F) : HasColimit G :=
HasColimit.mk
{ cocone := (Cocones.precompose α.hom).obj (colimit.cocone F)
isColimit := (IsColimit.precomposeHomEquiv _ _).symm (colimit.isColimit F) }
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-03")] alias hasColimitOfIso := hasColimit_of_iso
theorem hasColimit_iff_of_iso {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ≅ G) : HasColimit F ↔ HasColimit G :=
⟨fun _ ↦ hasColimit_of_iso α.symm, fun _ ↦ hasColimit_of_iso α⟩
/-- If a functor `G` has the same collection of cocones as a functor `F`
which has a colimit, then `G` also has a colimit. -/
theorem HasColimit.ofCoconesIso {K : Type u₁} [Category.{v₂} K] (F : J ⥤ C) (G : K ⥤ C)
(h : F.cocones ≅ G.cocones) [HasColimit F] : HasColimit G :=
HasColimit.mk ⟨_, IsColimit.ofNatIso (IsColimit.natIso (colimit.isColimit F) ≪≫ h)⟩
/-- The colimits of `F : J ⥤ C` and `G : J ⥤ C` are isomorphic,
if the functors are naturally isomorphic.
-/
def HasColimit.isoOfNatIso {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] [HasColimit G] (w : F ≅ G) :
colimit F ≅ colimit G :=
IsColimit.coconePointsIsoOfNatIso (colimit.isColimit F) (colimit.isColimit G) w
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem HasColimit.isoOfNatIso_ι_hom {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] [HasColimit G] (w : F ≅ G)
(j : J) : colimit.ι F j ≫ (HasColimit.isoOfNatIso w).hom = w.hom.app j ≫ colimit.ι G j :=
IsColimit.comp_coconePointsIsoOfNatIso_hom _ _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem HasColimit.isoOfNatIso_ι_inv {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] [HasColimit G] (w : F ≅ G)
(j : J) : colimit.ι G j ≫ (HasColimit.isoOfNatIso w).inv = w.inv.app j ≫ colimit.ι F j :=
IsColimit.comp_coconePointsIsoOfNatIso_inv _ _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem HasColimit.isoOfNatIso_hom_desc {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] [HasColimit G] (t : Cocone G)
(w : F ≅ G) :
(HasColimit.isoOfNatIso w).hom ≫ colimit.desc G t =
colimit.desc F ((Cocones.precompose w.hom).obj _) :=
IsColimit.coconePointsIsoOfNatIso_hom_desc _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem HasColimit.isoOfNatIso_inv_desc {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] [HasColimit G] (t : Cocone F)
(w : F ≅ G) :
(HasColimit.isoOfNatIso w).inv ≫ colimit.desc F t =
colimit.desc G ((Cocones.precompose w.inv).obj _) :=
IsColimit.coconePointsIsoOfNatIso_inv_desc _ _ _
/-- The colimits of `F : J ⥤ C` and `G : K ⥤ C` are isomorphic,
if there is an equivalence `e : J ≌ K` making the triangle commute up to natural isomorphism.
-/
def HasColimit.isoOfEquivalence {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] {G : K ⥤ C} [HasColimit G] (e : J ≌ K)
(w : e.functor ⋙ G ≅ F) : colimit F ≅ colimit G :=
IsColimit.coconePointsIsoOfEquivalence (colimit.isColimit F) (colimit.isColimit G) e w
@[simp]
theorem HasColimit.isoOfEquivalence_hom_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] {G : K ⥤ C} [HasColimit G]
(e : J ≌ K) (w : e.functor ⋙ G ≅ F) (j : J) :
colimit.ι F j ≫ (HasColimit.isoOfEquivalence e w).hom =
F.map (e.unit.app j) ≫ w.inv.app _ ≫ colimit.ι G _ := by
simp [HasColimit.isoOfEquivalence, IsColimit.coconePointsIsoOfEquivalence_inv]
@[simp]
theorem HasColimit.isoOfEquivalence_inv_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] {G : K ⥤ C} [HasColimit G]
(e : J ≌ K) (w : e.functor ⋙ G ≅ F) (k : K) :
colimit.ι G k ≫ (HasColimit.isoOfEquivalence e w).inv =
G.map (e.counitInv.app k) ≫ w.hom.app (e.inverse.obj k) ≫ colimit.ι F (e.inverse.obj k) := by
simp [HasColimit.isoOfEquivalence, IsColimit.coconePointsIsoOfEquivalence_inv]
section Pre
variable (F)
variable [HasColimit F] (E : K ⥤ J) [HasColimit (E ⋙ F)]
/-- The canonical morphism from the colimit of `E ⋙ F` to the colimit of `F`.
-/
def colimit.pre : colimit (E ⋙ F) ⟶ colimit F :=
colimit.desc (E ⋙ F) ((colimit.cocone F).whisker E)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem colimit.ι_pre (k : K) : colimit.ι (E ⋙ F) k ≫ colimit.pre F E = colimit.ι F (E.obj k) := by
erw [IsColimit.fac]
rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem colimit.ι_inv_pre [IsIso (pre F E)] (k : K) :
colimit.ι F (E.obj k) ≫ inv (colimit.pre F E) = colimit.ι (E ⋙ F) k := by
simp [IsIso.comp_inv_eq]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem colimit.pre_desc (c : Cocone F) :
colimit.pre F E ≫ colimit.desc F c = colimit.desc (E ⋙ F) (c.whisker E) := by
ext; rw [← assoc, colimit.ι_pre]; simp
variable {L : Type u₃} [Category.{v₃} L]
variable (D : L ⥤ K)
@[simp]
theorem colimit.pre_pre [h : HasColimit (D ⋙ E ⋙ F)] :
haveI : HasColimit ((D ⋙ E) ⋙ F) := h
colimit.pre (E ⋙ F) D ≫ colimit.pre F E = colimit.pre F (D ⋙ E) := by
| ext j
rw [← assoc, colimit.ι_pre, colimit.ι_pre]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/HasLimits.lean | 903 | 904 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Frédéric Dupuis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Field
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Balance
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Expect
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Star.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.CStarAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Operator.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Sqrt
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.VectorSpace
/-!
# `RCLike`: a typeclass for ℝ or ℂ
This file defines the typeclass `RCLike` intended to have only two instances:
ℝ and ℂ. It is meant for definitions and theorems which hold for both the real and the complex case,
and in particular when the real case follows directly from the complex case by setting `re` to `id`,
`im` to zero and so on. Its API follows closely that of ℂ.
Applications include defining inner products and Hilbert spaces for both the real and
complex case. One typically produces the definitions and proof for an arbitrary field of this
typeclass, which basically amounts to doing the complex case, and the two cases then fall out
immediately from the two instances of the class.
The instance for `ℝ` is registered in this file.
The instance for `ℂ` is declared in `Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/Basic.lean`.
## Implementation notes
The coercion from reals into an `RCLike` field is done by registering `RCLike.ofReal` as
a `CoeTC`. For this to work, we must proceed carefully to avoid problems involving circular
coercions in the case `K=ℝ`; in particular, we cannot use the plain `Coe` and must set
priorities carefully. This problem was already solved for `ℕ`, and we copy the solution detailed
in `Mathlib/Data/Nat/Cast/Defs.lean`. See also Note [coercion into rings] for more details.
In addition, several lemmas need to be set at priority 900 to make sure that they do not override
their counterparts in `Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/Basic.lean` (which causes linter errors).
A few lemmas requiring heavier imports are in `Mathlib/Analysis/RCLike/Lemmas.lean`.
-/
open Fintype
open scoped BigOperators ComplexConjugate
section
local notation "𝓚" => algebraMap ℝ _
/--
This typeclass captures properties shared by ℝ and ℂ, with an API that closely matches that of ℂ.
-/
class RCLike (K : semiOutParam Type*) extends DenselyNormedField K, StarRing K,
NormedAlgebra ℝ K, CompleteSpace K where
/-- The real part as an additive monoid homomorphism -/
re : K →+ ℝ
/-- The imaginary part as an additive monoid homomorphism -/
im : K →+ ℝ
/-- Imaginary unit in `K`. Meant to be set to `0` for `K = ℝ`. -/
I : K
I_re_ax : re I = 0
I_mul_I_ax : I = 0 ∨ I * I = -1
re_add_im_ax : ∀ z : K, 𝓚 (re z) + 𝓚 (im z) * I = z
ofReal_re_ax : ∀ r : ℝ, re (𝓚 r) = r
ofReal_im_ax : ∀ r : ℝ, im (𝓚 r) = 0
mul_re_ax : ∀ z w : K, re (z * w) = re z * re w - im z * im w
mul_im_ax : ∀ z w : K, im (z * w) = re z * im w + im z * re w
conj_re_ax : ∀ z : K, re (conj z) = re z
conj_im_ax : ∀ z : K, im (conj z) = -im z
conj_I_ax : conj I = -I
norm_sq_eq_def_ax : ∀ z : K, ‖z‖ ^ 2 = re z * re z + im z * im z
mul_im_I_ax : ∀ z : K, im z * im I = im z
/-- only an instance in the `ComplexOrder` locale -/
[toPartialOrder : PartialOrder K]
le_iff_re_im {z w : K} : z ≤ w ↔ re z ≤ re w ∧ im z = im w
-- note we cannot put this in the `extends` clause
[toDecidableEq : DecidableEq K]
scoped[ComplexOrder] attribute [instance 100] RCLike.toPartialOrder
attribute [instance 100] RCLike.toDecidableEq
end
variable {K E : Type*} [RCLike K]
namespace RCLike
/-- Coercion from `ℝ` to an `RCLike` field. -/
@[coe] abbrev ofReal : ℝ → K := Algebra.cast
/- The priority must be set at 900 to ensure that coercions are tried in the right order.
See Note [coercion into rings], or `Mathlib/Data/Nat/Cast/Basic.lean` for more details. -/
noncomputable instance (priority := 900) algebraMapCoe : CoeTC ℝ K :=
⟨ofReal⟩
theorem ofReal_alg (x : ℝ) : (x : K) = x • (1 : K) :=
Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one x
theorem real_smul_eq_coe_mul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : r • z = (r : K) * z :=
Algebra.smul_def r z
theorem real_smul_eq_coe_smul [AddCommGroup E] [Module K E] [Module ℝ E] [IsScalarTower ℝ K E]
(r : ℝ) (x : E) : r • x = (r : K) • x := by rw [RCLike.ofReal_alg, smul_one_smul]
|
theorem algebraMap_eq_ofReal : ⇑(algebraMap ℝ K) = ofReal :=
| Mathlib/Analysis/RCLike/Basic.lean | 106 | 107 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Additive
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Exact
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.Preadditive
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
/-!
# The short complexes attached to homological complexes
In this file, we define a functor
`shortComplexFunctor C c i : HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ ShortComplex C`.
By definition, the image of a homological complex `K` by this functor
is the short complex `K.X (c.prev i) ⟶ K.X i ⟶ K.X (c.next i)`.
The homology `K.homology i` of a homological complex `K` in degree `i` is defined as
the homology of the short complex `(shortComplexFunctor C c i).obj K`, which can be
abbreviated as `K.sc i`.
-/
open CategoryTheory Category Limits
namespace HomologicalComplex
variable (C : Type*) [Category C] [HasZeroMorphisms C] {ι : Type*} (c : ComplexShape ι)
/-- The functor `HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ ShortComplex C` which sends a homological
complex `K` to the short complex `K.X i ⟶ K.X j ⟶ K.X k` for arbitrary indices `i`, `j` and `k`. -/
@[simps]
def shortComplexFunctor' (i j k : ι) : HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ ShortComplex C where
obj K := ShortComplex.mk (K.d i j) (K.d j k) (K.d_comp_d i j k)
map f :=
{ τ₁ := f.f i
τ₂ := f.f j
τ₃ := f.f k }
/-- The functor `HomologicalComplex C c ⥤ ShortComplex C` which sends a homological
complex `K` to the short complex `K.X (c.prev i) ⟶ K.X i ⟶ K.X (c.next i)`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def shortComplexFunctor (i : ι) :=
shortComplexFunctor' C c (c.prev i) i (c.next i)
/-- The natural isomorphism `shortComplexFunctor C c j ≅ shortComplexFunctor' C c i j k`
when `c.prev j = i` and `c.next j = k`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def natIsoSc' (i j k : ι) (hi : c.prev j = i) (hk : c.next j = k) :
shortComplexFunctor C c j ≅ shortComplexFunctor' C c i j k :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun K => ShortComplex.isoMk (K.XIsoOfEq hi) (Iso.refl _) (K.XIsoOfEq hk)
(by simp) (by simp)) (by aesop_cat)
variable {C c}
variable (K L M : HomologicalComplex C c) (φ : K ⟶ L) (ψ : L ⟶ M) (i j k : ι)
/-- The short complex `K.X i ⟶ K.X j ⟶ K.X k` for arbitrary indices `i`, `j` and `k`. -/
abbrev sc' := (shortComplexFunctor' C c i j k).obj K
/-- The short complex `K.X (c.prev i) ⟶ K.X i ⟶ K.X (c.next i)`. -/
noncomputable abbrev sc := (shortComplexFunctor C c i).obj K
/-- The canonical isomorphism `K.sc j ≅ K.sc' i j k` when `c.prev j = i` and `c.next j = k`. -/
noncomputable abbrev isoSc' (hi : c.prev j = i) (hk : c.next j = k) :
K.sc j ≅ K.sc' i j k := (natIsoSc' C c i j k hi hk).app K
/-- A homological complex `K` has homology in degree `i` if the associated
short complex `K.sc i` has. -/
abbrev HasHomology := (K.sc i).HasHomology
section
variable [K.HasHomology i]
/-- The homology in degree `i` of a homological complex. -/
noncomputable def homology := (K.sc i).homology
/-- The cycles in degree `i` of a homological complex. -/
noncomputable def cycles := (K.sc i).cycles
/-- The inclusion of the cycles of a homological complex. -/
noncomputable def iCycles : K.cycles i ⟶ K.X i := (K.sc i).iCycles
/-- The homology class map from cycles to the homology of a homological complex. -/
noncomputable def homologyπ : K.cycles i ⟶ K.homology i := (K.sc i).homologyπ
variable {i}
/-- The morphism to `K.cycles i` that is induced by a "cycle", i.e. a morphism
to `K.X i` whose postcomposition with the differential is zero. -/
noncomputable def liftCycles {A : C} (k : A ⟶ K.X i) (j : ι) (hj : c.next i = j)
(hk : k ≫ K.d i j = 0) : A ⟶ K.cycles i :=
(K.sc i).liftCycles k (by subst hj; exact hk)
/-- The morphism to `K.cycles i` that is induced by a "cycle", i.e. a morphism
to `K.X i` whose postcomposition with the differential is zero. -/
noncomputable abbrev liftCycles' {A : C} (k : A ⟶ K.X i) (j : ι) (hj : c.Rel i j)
(hk : k ≫ K.d i j = 0) : A ⟶ K.cycles i :=
K.liftCycles k j (c.next_eq' hj) hk
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma liftCycles_i {A : C} (k : A ⟶ K.X i) (j : ι) (hj : c.next i = j)
(hk : k ≫ K.d i j = 0) : K.liftCycles k j hj hk ≫ K.iCycles i = k := by
dsimp [liftCycles, iCycles]
simp
| variable (i)
/-- The map `K.X i ⟶ K.cycles j` induced by the differential `K.d i j`. -/
noncomputable def toCycles [K.HasHomology j] :
K.X i ⟶ K.cycles j :=
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/ShortComplex/HomologicalComplex.lean | 109 | 113 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot, Casper Putz, Anne Baanen, Wen Yang
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Transvection
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.NonsingularInverse
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
/-!
# Block matrices and their determinant
This file defines a predicate `Matrix.BlockTriangular` saying a matrix
is block triangular, and proves the value of the determinant for various
matrices built out of blocks.
## Main definitions
* `Matrix.BlockTriangular` expresses that an `o` by `o` matrix is block triangular,
if the rows and columns are ordered according to some order `b : o → α`
## Main results
* `Matrix.det_of_blockTriangular`: the determinant of a block triangular matrix
is equal to the product of the determinants of all the blocks
* `Matrix.det_of_upperTriangular` and `Matrix.det_of_lowerTriangular`: the determinant of
a triangular matrix is the product of the entries along the diagonal
## Tags
matrix, diagonal, det, block triangular
-/
open Finset Function OrderDual
open Matrix
universe v
variable {α β m n o : Type*} {m' n' : α → Type*}
variable {R : Type v} {M N : Matrix m m R} {b : m → α}
namespace Matrix
section LT
variable [LT α]
section Zero
variable [Zero R]
/-- Let `b` map rows and columns of a square matrix `M` to blocks indexed by `α`s. Then
`BlockTriangular M n b` says the matrix is block triangular. -/
def BlockTriangular (M : Matrix m m R) (b : m → α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃i j⦄, b j < b i → M i j = 0
@[simp]
protected theorem BlockTriangular.submatrix {f : n → m} (h : M.BlockTriangular b) :
(M.submatrix f f).BlockTriangular (b ∘ f) := fun _ _ hij => h hij
theorem blockTriangular_reindex_iff {b : n → α} {e : m ≃ n} :
(reindex e e M).BlockTriangular b ↔ M.BlockTriangular (b ∘ e) := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· convert h.submatrix
simp only [reindex_apply, submatrix_submatrix, submatrix_id_id, Equiv.symm_comp_self]
· convert h.submatrix
simp only [comp_assoc b e e.symm, Equiv.self_comp_symm, comp_id]
protected theorem BlockTriangular.transpose :
M.BlockTriangular b → Mᵀ.BlockTriangular (toDual ∘ b) :=
swap
@[simp]
protected theorem blockTriangular_transpose_iff {b : m → αᵒᵈ} :
Mᵀ.BlockTriangular b ↔ M.BlockTriangular (ofDual ∘ b) :=
forall_swap
@[simp]
theorem blockTriangular_zero : BlockTriangular (0 : Matrix m m R) b := fun _ _ _ => rfl
end Zero
protected theorem BlockTriangular.neg [NegZeroClass R] {M : Matrix m m R}
(hM : BlockTriangular M b) : BlockTriangular (-M) b :=
fun _ _ h => by rw [neg_apply, hM h, neg_zero]
theorem BlockTriangular.add [AddZeroClass R] (hM : BlockTriangular M b) (hN : BlockTriangular N b) :
BlockTriangular (M + N) b := fun i j h => by simp_rw [Matrix.add_apply, hM h, hN h, zero_add]
theorem BlockTriangular.sub [SubNegZeroMonoid R]
(hM : BlockTriangular M b) (hN : BlockTriangular N b) :
BlockTriangular (M - N) b := fun i j h => by simp_rw [Matrix.sub_apply, hM h, hN h, sub_zero]
lemma BlockTriangular.add_iff_right [AddGroup R] (hM : BlockTriangular M b) :
BlockTriangular (M + N) b ↔ BlockTriangular N b := ⟨(by simpa using hM.neg.add ·), hM.add⟩
lemma BlockTriangular.add_iff_left [AddGroup R] (hN : BlockTriangular N b) :
BlockTriangular (M + N) b ↔ BlockTriangular M b := ⟨(by simpa using ·.sub hN), (·.add hN)⟩
lemma BlockTriangular.sub_iff_right [AddGroup R] (hM : BlockTriangular M b) :
BlockTriangular (M - N) b ↔ BlockTriangular N b := ⟨(by simpa using ·.neg.add hM), hM.sub⟩
lemma BlockTriangular.sub_iff_left [AddGroup R] (hN : BlockTriangular N b) :
BlockTriangular (M - N) b ↔ BlockTriangular M b := ⟨(by simpa using ·.add hN), (·.sub hN)⟩
lemma BlockTriangular.map {S F} [FunLike F R S] [Zero R] [Zero S] [ZeroHomClass F R S] (f : F)
(h : BlockTriangular M b) : BlockTriangular (M.map f) b :=
fun i j lt ↦ by simp [h lt]
lemma BlockTriangular.comp [Zero R] {M : Matrix m m (Matrix n n R)} (h : BlockTriangular M b) :
BlockTriangular (M.comp m m n n R) fun i ↦ b i.1 :=
fun i j lt ↦ by simp [h lt]
end LT
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
section Zero
variable [Zero R]
theorem blockTriangular_diagonal [DecidableEq m] (d : m → R) : BlockTriangular (diagonal d) b :=
fun _ _ h => diagonal_apply_ne' d fun h' => ne_of_lt h (congr_arg _ h')
theorem blockTriangular_blockDiagonal' [DecidableEq α] (d : ∀ i : α, Matrix (m' i) (m' i) R) :
BlockTriangular (blockDiagonal' d) Sigma.fst := by
rintro ⟨i, i'⟩ ⟨j, j'⟩ h
apply blockDiagonal'_apply_ne d i' j' fun h' => ne_of_lt h h'.symm
| theorem blockTriangular_blockDiagonal [DecidableEq α] (d : α → Matrix m m R) :
BlockTriangular (blockDiagonal d) Prod.snd := by
rintro ⟨i, i'⟩ ⟨j, j'⟩ h
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Block.lean | 134 | 136 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Unbundled.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Sub.Defs
import Mathlib.Util.AssertExists
/-!
# Ordered groups
This file defines bundled ordered groups and develops a few basic results.
## Implementation details
Unfortunately, the number of `'` appended to lemmas in this file
may differ between the multiplicative and the additive version of a lemma.
The reason is that we did not want to change existing names in the library.
-/
/-
`NeZero` theory should not be needed at this point in the ordered algebraic hierarchy.
-/
assert_not_imported Mathlib.Algebra.NeZero
open Function
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
/-- An ordered additive commutative group is an additive commutative group
with a partial order in which addition is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[AddCommGroup α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure OrderedAddCommGroup (α : Type u) extends AddCommGroup α, PartialOrder α where
/-- Addition is monotone in an ordered additive commutative group. -/
protected add_le_add_left : ∀ a b : α, a ≤ b → ∀ c : α, c + a ≤ c + b
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
/-- An ordered commutative group is a commutative group
with a partial order in which multiplication is strictly monotone. -/
@[to_additive,
deprecated "Use `[CommGroup α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure OrderedCommGroup (α : Type u) extends CommGroup α, PartialOrder α where
/-- Multiplication is monotone in an ordered commutative group. -/
protected mul_le_mul_left : ∀ a b : α, a ≤ b → ∀ c : α, c * a ≤ c * b
alias OrderedCommGroup.mul_lt_mul_left' := mul_lt_mul_left'
attribute [to_additive OrderedAddCommGroup.add_lt_add_left] OrderedCommGroup.mul_lt_mul_left'
alias OrderedCommGroup.le_of_mul_le_mul_left := le_of_mul_le_mul_left'
attribute [to_additive] OrderedCommGroup.le_of_mul_le_mul_left
alias OrderedCommGroup.lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left := lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left'
attribute [to_additive] OrderedCommGroup.lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive IsOrderedAddMonoid.toIsOrderedCancelAddMonoid]
instance (priority := 100) IsOrderedMonoid.toIsOrderedCancelMonoid
[CommGroup α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α] : IsOrderedCancelMonoid α where
le_of_mul_le_mul_left a b c bc := by simpa using mul_le_mul_left' bc a⁻¹
le_of_mul_le_mul_right a b c bc := by simpa using mul_le_mul_left' bc a⁻¹
/-!
### Linearly ordered commutative groups
-/
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A linearly ordered additive commutative group is an
additive commutative group with a linear order in which
addition is monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[AddCommGroup α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure LinearOrderedAddCommGroup (α : Type u) extends OrderedAddCommGroup α, LinearOrder α
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A linearly ordered commutative group is a
commutative group with a linear order in which
multiplication is monotone. -/
@[to_additive,
deprecated "Use `[CommGroup α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure LinearOrderedCommGroup (α : Type u) extends OrderedCommGroup α, LinearOrder α
attribute [nolint docBlame]
LinearOrderedCommGroup.toLinearOrder LinearOrderedAddCommGroup.toLinearOrder
section LinearOrderedCommGroup
variable [CommGroup α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α] {a : α}
@[to_additive LinearOrderedAddCommGroup.add_lt_add_left]
theorem LinearOrderedCommGroup.mul_lt_mul_left' (a b : α) (h : a < b) (c : α) : c * a < c * b :=
_root_.mul_lt_mul_left' h c
@[to_additive eq_zero_of_neg_eq]
theorem eq_one_of_inv_eq' (h : a⁻¹ = a) : a = 1 :=
match lt_trichotomy a 1 with
| Or.inl h₁ =>
have : 1 < a := h ▸ one_lt_inv_of_inv h₁
absurd h₁ this.asymm
| Or.inr (Or.inl h₁) => h₁
| Or.inr (Or.inr h₁) =>
have : a < 1 := h ▸ inv_lt_one'.mpr h₁
absurd h₁ this.asymm
@[to_additive exists_zero_lt]
theorem exists_one_lt' [Nontrivial α] : ∃ a : α, 1 < a := by
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := Decidable.exists_ne (1 : α)
obtain h|h := hy.lt_or_lt
· exact ⟨y⁻¹, one_lt_inv'.mpr h⟩
· exact ⟨y, h⟩
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) LinearOrderedCommGroup.to_noMaxOrder [Nontrivial α] : NoMaxOrder α :=
⟨by
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ : ∃ a : α, 1 < a := exists_one_lt'
exact fun a => ⟨a * y, lt_mul_of_one_lt_right' a hy⟩⟩
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) LinearOrderedCommGroup.to_noMinOrder [Nontrivial α] : NoMinOrder α :=
⟨by
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ : ∃ a : α, 1 < a := exists_one_lt'
exact fun a => ⟨a / y, (div_lt_self_iff a).mpr hy⟩⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_le_self_iff : a⁻¹ ≤ a ↔ 1 ≤ a := by simp [inv_le_iff_one_le_mul']
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_lt_self_iff : a⁻¹ < a ↔ 1 < a := by simp [inv_lt_iff_one_lt_mul]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem le_inv_self_iff : a ≤ a⁻¹ ↔ a ≤ 1 := by simp [← not_iff_not]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lt_inv_self_iff : a < a⁻¹ ↔ a < 1 := by simp [← not_iff_not]
end LinearOrderedCommGroup
section NormNumLemmas
/- The following lemmas are stated so that the `norm_num` tactic can use them with the
expected signatures. -/
variable [CommGroup α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α] {a b : α}
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) neg_le_neg]
theorem inv_le_inv' : a ≤ b → b⁻¹ ≤ a⁻¹ :=
inv_le_inv_iff.mpr
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) neg_lt_neg]
theorem inv_lt_inv' : a < b → b⁻¹ < a⁻¹ :=
inv_lt_inv_iff.mpr
-- The additive version is also a `linarith` lemma.
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_lt_one_of_one_lt : 1 < a → a⁻¹ < 1 :=
inv_lt_one_iff_one_lt.mpr
-- The additive version is also a `linarith` lemma.
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_le_one_of_one_le : 1 ≤ a → a⁻¹ ≤ 1 :=
inv_le_one'.mpr
@[to_additive neg_nonneg_of_nonpos]
theorem one_le_inv_of_le_one : a ≤ 1 → 1 ≤ a⁻¹ :=
one_le_inv'.mpr
end NormNumLemmas
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Group/Defs.lean | 1,038 | 1,039 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Int
/-! # ℤ as a normed group -/
open NNReal
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Int
instance instNormedAddCommGroup : NormedAddCommGroup ℤ where
norm n := ‖(n : ℝ)‖
dist_eq m n := by simp only [Int.dist_eq, norm, Int.cast_sub]
@[norm_cast]
theorem norm_cast_real (m : ℤ) : ‖(m : ℝ)‖ = ‖m‖ :=
rfl
theorem norm_eq_abs (n : ℤ) : ‖n‖ = |(n : ℝ)| :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem norm_natCast (n : ℕ) : ‖(n : ℤ)‖ = n := by simp [Int.norm_eq_abs]
theorem _root_.NNReal.natCast_natAbs (n : ℤ) : (n.natAbs : ℝ≥0) = ‖n‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <|
calc
((n.natAbs : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (n.natAbs : ℤ) := by simp only [Int.cast_natCast, NNReal.coe_natCast]
_ = |(n : ℝ)| := by simp only [Int.natCast_natAbs, Int.cast_abs]
_ = ‖n‖ := (norm_eq_abs n).symm
theorem abs_le_floor_nnreal_iff (z : ℤ) (c : ℝ≥0) : |z| ≤ ⌊c⌋₊ ↔ ‖z‖₊ ≤ c := by
rw [Int.abs_eq_natAbs, Int.ofNat_le, Nat.le_floor_iff (zero_le c), NNReal.natCast_natAbs z]
end Int
-- Now that we've installed the norm on `ℤ`,
| -- we can state some lemmas about `zsmul`.
section
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/Int.lean | 44 | 45 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn, Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.InitialSeg
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Basic
/-!
# Ordinal arithmetic
Ordinals have an addition (corresponding to disjoint union) that turns them into an additive
monoid, and a multiplication (corresponding to the lexicographic order on the product) that turns
them into a monoid. One can also define correspondingly a subtraction, a division, a successor
function, a power function and a logarithm function.
We also define limit ordinals and prove the basic induction principle on ordinals separating
successor ordinals and limit ordinals, in `limitRecOn`.
## Main definitions and results
* `o₁ + o₂` is the order on the disjoint union of `o₁` and `o₂` obtained by declaring that
every element of `o₁` is smaller than every element of `o₂`.
* `o₁ - o₂` is the unique ordinal `o` such that `o₂ + o = o₁`, when `o₂ ≤ o₁`.
* `o₁ * o₂` is the lexicographic order on `o₂ × o₁`.
* `o₁ / o₂` is the ordinal `o` such that `o₁ = o₂ * o + o'` with `o' < o₂`. We also define the
divisibility predicate, and a modulo operation.
* `Order.succ o = o + 1` is the successor of `o`.
* `pred o` if the predecessor of `o`. If `o` is not a successor, we set `pred o = o`.
We discuss the properties of casts of natural numbers of and of `ω` with respect to these
operations.
Some properties of the operations are also used to discuss general tools on ordinals:
* `IsLimit o`: an ordinal is a limit ordinal if it is neither `0` nor a successor.
* `limitRecOn` is the main induction principle of ordinals: if one can prove a property by
induction at successor ordinals and at limit ordinals, then it holds for all ordinals.
* `IsNormal`: a function `f : Ordinal → Ordinal` satisfies `IsNormal` if it is strictly increasing
and order-continuous, i.e., the image `f o` of a limit ordinal `o` is the sup of `f a` for
`a < o`.
Various other basic arithmetic results are given in `Principal.lean` instead.
-/
assert_not_exists Field Module
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Equiv Order
open scoped Ordinal
universe u v w
namespace Ordinal
variable {α β γ : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} {t : γ → γ → Prop}
/-! ### Further properties of addition on ordinals -/
@[simp]
theorem lift_add (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a + b) = lift.{u} a + lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.sumLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _) (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_succ (a : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (succ a) = succ (lift.{u} a) := by
rw [← add_one_eq_succ, lift_add, lift_one]
rfl
instance instAddLeftReflectLE :
AddLeftReflectLE Ordinal.{u} where
elim c a b := by
refine inductionOn₃ a b c fun α r _ β s _ γ t _ ⟨f⟩ ↦ ?_
have H₁ a : f (Sum.inl a) = Sum.inl a := by
simpa using ((InitialSeg.leAdd t r).trans f).eq (InitialSeg.leAdd t s) a
have H₂ a : ∃ b, f (Sum.inr a) = Sum.inr b := by
generalize hx : f (Sum.inr a) = x
obtain x | x := x
· rw [← H₁, f.inj] at hx
contradiction
· exact ⟨x, rfl⟩
choose g hg using H₂
refine (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone g fun _ _ h ↦ ?_).ordinal_type_le
rwa [← @Sum.lex_inr_inr _ t _ s, ← hg, ← hg, f.map_rel_iff, Sum.lex_inr_inr]
instance : IsLeftCancelAdd Ordinal where
add_left_cancel a b c h := by simpa only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_left] using h
@[deprecated add_left_cancel_iff (since := "2024-12-11")]
protected theorem add_left_cancel (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c :=
add_left_cancel_iff
private theorem add_lt_add_iff_left' (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b < a + c ↔ b < c := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_le, add_le_add_iff_left]
instance instAddLeftStrictMono : AddLeftStrictMono Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a _b _c ↦ (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).2⟩
instance instAddLeftReflectLT : AddLeftReflectLT Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a _b _c ↦ (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).1⟩
instance instAddRightReflectLT : AddRightReflectLT Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun _a _b _c ↦ lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h => add_le_add_right h _⟩
theorem add_le_add_iff_right {a b : Ordinal} : ∀ n : ℕ, a + n ≤ b + n ↔ a ≤ b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by
simp only [natCast_succ, add_succ, add_succ, succ_le_succ_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
theorem add_right_cancel {a b : Ordinal} (n : ℕ) : a + n = b + n ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
theorem add_eq_zero_iff {a b : Ordinal} : a + b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun α r _ β s _ => by
simp_rw [← type_sum_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty]
exact isEmpty_sum
theorem left_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : a = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).1
theorem right_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : b = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).2
/-! ### The predecessor of an ordinal -/
open Classical in
/-- The ordinal predecessor of `o` is `o'` if `o = succ o'`,
and `o` otherwise. -/
def pred (o : Ordinal) : Ordinal :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then Classical.choose h else o
@[simp]
theorem pred_succ (o) : pred (succ o) = o := by
have h : ∃ a, succ o = succ a := ⟨_, rfl⟩
simpa only [pred, dif_pos h] using (succ_injective <| Classical.choose_spec h).symm
theorem pred_le_self (o) : pred o ≤ o := by
classical
exact if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by
let ⟨a, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ]; exact le_succ a
else by rw [pred, dif_neg h]
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ {o} : pred o = o ↔ ¬∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e ⟨a, e'⟩ => by rw [e', pred_succ] at e; exact (lt_succ a).ne e, fun h => dif_neg h⟩
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ' {o} : pred o = o ↔ ∀ a, o ≠ succ a := by
simpa using pred_eq_iff_not_succ
theorem pred_lt_iff_is_succ {o} : pred o < o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
Iff.trans (by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, pred_le_self, true_and, not_le])
(iff_not_comm.1 pred_eq_iff_not_succ).symm
@[simp]
theorem pred_zero : pred 0 = 0 :=
pred_eq_iff_not_succ'.2 fun a => (succ_ne_zero a).symm
theorem succ_pred_iff_is_succ {o} : succ (pred o) = o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e => ⟨_, e.symm⟩, fun ⟨a, e⟩ => by simp only [e, pred_succ]⟩
theorem succ_lt_of_not_succ {o b : Ordinal} (h : ¬∃ a, o = succ a) : succ b < o ↔ b < o :=
⟨(lt_succ b).trans, fun l => lt_of_le_of_ne (succ_le_of_lt l) fun e => h ⟨_, e.symm⟩⟩
theorem lt_pred {a b} : a < pred b ↔ succ a < b := by
classical
exact if h : ∃ a, b = succ a then by
let ⟨c, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ, succ_lt_succ_iff]
else by simp only [pred, dif_neg h, succ_lt_of_not_succ h]
theorem pred_le {a b} : pred a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ succ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 lt_pred
@[simp]
theorem lift_is_succ {o : Ordinal.{v}} : (∃ a, lift.{u} o = succ a) ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ =>
let ⟨b, e⟩ := mem_range_lift_of_le <| show a ≤ lift.{u} o from le_of_lt <| h.symm ▸ lt_succ a
⟨b, (lift_inj.{u,v}).1 <| by rw [h, ← e, lift_succ]⟩,
fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨lift.{u} a, by simp only [h, lift_succ]⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_pred (o : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (pred o) = pred (lift.{u} o) := by
classical
exact if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by obtain ⟨a, e⟩ := h; simp only [e, pred_succ, lift_succ]
else by rw [pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 h, pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 (mt lift_is_succ.1 h)]
/-! ### Limit ordinals -/
/-- A limit ordinal is an ordinal which is not zero and not a successor.
TODO: deprecate this in favor of `Order.IsSuccLimit`. -/
def IsLimit (o : Ordinal) : Prop :=
IsSuccLimit o
theorem isLimit_iff {o} : IsLimit o ↔ o ≠ 0 ∧ IsSuccPrelimit o := by
simp [IsLimit, IsSuccLimit]
theorem IsLimit.isSuccPrelimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : IsSuccPrelimit o :=
IsSuccLimit.isSuccPrelimit h
theorem IsLimit.succ_lt {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : a < o → succ a < o :=
IsSuccLimit.succ_lt h
theorem isSuccPrelimit_zero : IsSuccPrelimit (0 : Ordinal) := isSuccPrelimit_bot
theorem not_zero_isLimit : ¬IsLimit 0 :=
| not_isSuccLimit_bot
theorem not_succ_isLimit (o) : ¬IsLimit (succ o) :=
not_isSuccLimit_succ o
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean | 213 | 217 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Nathaniel Thomas, Jeremy Avigad, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Anne Baanen,
Frédéric Dupuis, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Hom.Instances
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.NatInt
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.RingHom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.CompTypeclasses
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Hom
/-!
# (Semi)linear maps
In this file we define
* `LinearMap σ M M₂`, `M →ₛₗ[σ] M₂` : a semilinear map between two `Module`s. Here,
`σ` is a `RingHom` from `R` to `R₂` and an `f : M →ₛₗ[σ] M₂` satisfies
`f (c • x) = (σ c) • (f x)`. We recover plain linear maps by choosing `σ` to be `RingHom.id R`.
This is denoted by `M →ₗ[R] M₂`. We also add the notation `M →ₗ⋆[R] M₂` for star-linear maps.
* `IsLinearMap R f` : predicate saying that `f : M → M₂` is a linear map. (Note that this
was not generalized to semilinear maps.)
We then provide `LinearMap` with the following instances:
* `LinearMap.addCommMonoid` and `LinearMap.addCommGroup`: the elementwise addition structures
corresponding to addition in the codomain
* `LinearMap.distribMulAction` and `LinearMap.module`: the elementwise scalar action structures
corresponding to applying the action in the codomain.
## Implementation notes
To ensure that composition works smoothly for semilinear maps, we use the typeclasses
`RingHomCompTriple`, `RingHomInvPair` and `RingHomSurjective` from
`Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.CompTypeclasses`.
## Notation
* Throughout the file, we denote regular linear maps by `fₗ`, `gₗ`, etc, and semilinear maps
by `f`, `g`, etc.
## TODO
* Parts of this file have not yet been generalized to semilinear maps (i.e. `CompatibleSMul`)
## Tags
linear map
-/
assert_not_exists Star DomMulAct Pi.module WCovBy.image Field
open Function
universe u u' v w
variable {R R₁ R₂ R₃ S S₃ T M M₁ M₂ M₃ N₂ N₃ : Type*}
/-- A map `f` between modules over a semiring is linear if it satisfies the two properties
`f (x + y) = f x + f y` and `f (c • x) = c • f x`. The predicate `IsLinearMap R f` asserts this
property. A bundled version is available with `LinearMap`, and should be favored over
`IsLinearMap` most of the time. -/
structure IsLinearMap (R : Type u) {M : Type v} {M₂ : Type w} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M]
[AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R M] [Module R M₂] (f : M → M₂) : Prop where
/-- A linear map preserves addition. -/
map_add : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y
/-- A linear map preserves scalar multiplication. -/
map_smul : ∀ (c : R) (x), f (c • x) = c • f x
section
/-- A map `f` between an `R`-module and an `S`-module over a ring homomorphism `σ : R →+* S`
is semilinear if it satisfies the two properties `f (x + y) = f x + f y` and
`f (c • x) = (σ c) • f x`. Elements of `LinearMap σ M M₂` (available under the notation
`M →ₛₗ[σ] M₂`) are bundled versions of such maps. For plain linear maps (i.e. for which
`σ = RingHom.id R`), the notation `M →ₗ[R] M₂` is available. An unbundled version of plain linear
maps is available with the predicate `IsLinearMap`, but it should be avoided most of the time. -/
structure LinearMap {R S : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] (σ : R →+* S) (M : Type*)
(M₂ : Type*) [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R M] [Module S M₂] extends
AddHom M M₂, MulActionHom σ M M₂
/-- The `MulActionHom` underlying a `LinearMap`. -/
add_decl_doc LinearMap.toMulActionHom
/-- The `AddHom` underlying a `LinearMap`. -/
add_decl_doc LinearMap.toAddHom
/-- `M →ₛₗ[σ] N` is the type of `σ`-semilinear maps from `M` to `N`. -/
notation:25 M " →ₛₗ[" σ:25 "] " M₂:0 => LinearMap σ M M₂
/-- `M →ₗ[R] N` is the type of `R`-linear maps from `M` to `N`. -/
notation:25 M " →ₗ[" R:25 "] " M₂:0 => LinearMap (RingHom.id R) M M₂
/-- `SemilinearMapClass F σ M M₂` asserts `F` is a type of bundled `σ`-semilinear maps `M → M₂`.
See also `LinearMapClass F R M M₂` for the case where `σ` is the identity map on `R`.
A map `f` between an `R`-module and an `S`-module over a ring homomorphism `σ : R →+* S`
is semilinear if it satisfies the two properties `f (x + y) = f x + f y` and
`f (c • x) = (σ c) • f x`. -/
class SemilinearMapClass (F : Type*) {R S : outParam Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S]
(σ : outParam (R →+* S)) (M M₂ : outParam Type*) [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂]
[Module R M] [Module S M₂] [FunLike F M M₂] : Prop
extends AddHomClass F M M₂, MulActionSemiHomClass F σ M M₂
end
-- `map_smulₛₗ` should be `@[simp]` but doesn't fire due to https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3701.
-- attribute [simp] map_smulₛₗ
/-- `LinearMapClass F R M M₂` asserts `F` is a type of bundled `R`-linear maps `M → M₂`.
This is an abbreviation for `SemilinearMapClass F (RingHom.id R) M M₂`.
-/
abbrev LinearMapClass (F : Type*) (R : outParam Type*) (M M₂ : Type*)
[Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R M] [Module R M₂]
[FunLike F M M₂] :=
SemilinearMapClass F (RingHom.id R) M M₂
protected lemma LinearMapClass.map_smul {R M M₂ : outParam Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M]
[AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R M] [Module R M₂]
{F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₂] [LinearMapClass F R M M₂] (f : F) (r : R) (x : M) :
f (r • x) = r • f x := by rw [map_smul]
namespace SemilinearMapClass
variable (F : Type*)
variable [Semiring R] [Semiring S]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₁] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃]
variable [Module R M] [Module R M₂] [Module S M₃]
variable {σ : R →+* S}
instance (priority := 100) instAddMonoidHomClass [FunLike F M M₃] [SemilinearMapClass F σ M M₃] :
AddMonoidHomClass F M M₃ :=
{ SemilinearMapClass.toAddHomClass with
map_zero := fun f ↦
show f 0 = 0 by
rw [← zero_smul R (0 : M), map_smulₛₗ]
simp }
instance (priority := 100) distribMulActionSemiHomClass
[FunLike F M M₃] [SemilinearMapClass F σ M M₃] :
DistribMulActionSemiHomClass F σ M M₃ :=
{ SemilinearMapClass.toAddHomClass with
map_smulₛₗ := fun f c x ↦ by rw [map_smulₛₗ] }
variable {F} (f : F) [FunLike F M M₃] [SemilinearMapClass F σ M M₃]
theorem map_smul_inv {σ' : S →+* R} [RingHomInvPair σ σ'] (c : S) (x : M) :
c • f x = f (σ' c • x) := by simp [map_smulₛₗ _]
/-- Reinterpret an element of a type of semilinear maps as a semilinear map. -/
@[coe]
def semilinearMap : M →ₛₗ[σ] M₃ where
toFun := f
map_add' := map_add f
map_smul' := map_smulₛₗ f
/-- Reinterpret an element of a type of semilinear maps as a semilinear map. -/
instance instCoeToSemilinearMap : CoeHead F (M →ₛₗ[σ] M₃) where
coe f := semilinearMap f
end SemilinearMapClass
namespace LinearMapClass
variable {F : Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M₁] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R M₁] [Module R M₂]
(f : F) [FunLike F M₁ M₂] [LinearMapClass F R M₁ M₂]
/-- Reinterpret an element of a type of linear maps as a linear map. -/
abbrev linearMap : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂ := SemilinearMapClass.semilinearMap f
/-- Reinterpret an element of a type of linear maps as a linear map. -/
instance instCoeToLinearMap : CoeHead F (M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) where
coe f := SemilinearMapClass.semilinearMap f
end LinearMapClass
namespace LinearMap
section AddCommMonoid
variable [Semiring R] [Semiring S]
section
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₁] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃]
variable [Module R M] [Module R M₂] [Module S M₃]
variable {σ : R →+* S}
instance instFunLike : FunLike (M →ₛₗ[σ] M₃) M M₃ where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by
cases f
cases g
congr
apply DFunLike.coe_injective'
exact h
instance semilinearMapClass : SemilinearMapClass (M →ₛₗ[σ] M₃) σ M M₃ where
map_add f := f.map_add'
map_smulₛₗ := LinearMap.map_smul'
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma coe_coe {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₃] [SemilinearMapClass F σ M M₃] {f : F} :
⇑(f : M →ₛₗ[σ] M₃) = f :=
rfl
/-- The `DistribMulActionHom` underlying a `LinearMap`. -/
def toDistribMulActionHom (f : M →ₛₗ[σ] M₃) : DistribMulActionHom σ.toMonoidHom M M₃ :=
{ f with map_zero' := show f 0 = 0 from map_zero f }
@[simp]
theorem coe_toAddHom (f : M →ₛₗ[σ] M₃) : ⇑f.toAddHom = f := rfl
-- Porting note: no longer a `simp`
theorem toFun_eq_coe {f : M →ₛₗ[σ] M₃} : f.toFun = (f : M → M₃) := rfl
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : M →ₛₗ[σ] M₃} (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g h
/-- Copy of a `LinearMap` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
protected def copy (f : M →ₛₗ[σ] M₃) (f' : M → M₃) (h : f' = ⇑f) : M →ₛₗ[σ] M₃ where
toFun := f'
map_add' := h.symm ▸ f.map_add'
map_smul' := h.symm ▸ f.map_smul'
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (f : M →ₛₗ[σ] M₃) (f' : M → M₃) (h : f' = ⇑f) : ⇑(f.copy f' h) = f' :=
rfl
theorem copy_eq (f : M →ₛₗ[σ] M₃) (f' : M → M₃) (h : f' = ⇑f) : f.copy f' h = f :=
DFunLike.ext' h
initialize_simps_projections LinearMap (toFun → apply)
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk {σ : R →+* S} (f : AddHom M M₃) (h) :
((LinearMap.mk f h : M →ₛₗ[σ] M₃) : M → M₃) = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_addHom_mk {σ : R →+* S} (f : AddHom M M₃) (h) :
((LinearMap.mk f h : M →ₛₗ[σ] M₃) : AddHom M M₃) = f :=
rfl
theorem coe_semilinearMap {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₃] [SemilinearMapClass F σ M M₃] (f : F) :
((f : M →ₛₗ[σ] M₃) : M → M₃) = f :=
rfl
theorem toLinearMap_injective {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₃] [SemilinearMapClass F σ M M₃]
{f g : F} (h : (f : M →ₛₗ[σ] M₃) = (g : M →ₛₗ[σ] M₃)) :
f = g := by
apply DFunLike.ext
intro m
exact DFunLike.congr_fun h m
/-- Identity map as a `LinearMap` -/
def id : M →ₗ[R] M :=
{ DistribMulActionHom.id R with toFun := _root_.id }
theorem id_apply (x : M) : @id R M _ _ _ x = x :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem id_coe : ((LinearMap.id : M →ₗ[R] M) : M → M) = _root_.id :=
rfl
/-- A generalisation of `LinearMap.id` that constructs the identity function
as a `σ`-semilinear map for any ring homomorphism `σ` which we know is the identity. -/
@[simps]
def id' {σ : R →+* R} [RingHomId σ] : M →ₛₗ[σ] M where
toFun x := x
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' r x := by
have := (RingHomId.eq_id : σ = _)
subst this
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem id'_coe {σ : R →+* R} [RingHomId σ] : ((id' : M →ₛₗ[σ] M) : M → M) = _root_.id :=
rfl
end
section
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₁] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃]
variable [Module R M] [Module R M₂] [Module S M₃]
variable (σ : R →+* S)
variable (fₗ : M →ₗ[R] M₂) (f g : M →ₛₗ[σ] M₃)
theorem isLinear : IsLinearMap R fₗ :=
⟨fₗ.map_add', fₗ.map_smul'⟩
variable {fₗ f g σ}
theorem coe_injective : Injective (DFunLike.coe : (M →ₛₗ[σ] M₃) → _) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective
protected theorem congr_arg {x x' : M} : x = x' → f x = f x' :=
DFunLike.congr_arg f
/-- If two linear maps are equal, they are equal at each point. -/
protected theorem congr_fun (h : f = g) (x : M) : f x = g x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun h x
@[simp]
theorem mk_coe (f : M →ₛₗ[σ] M₃) (h) : (LinearMap.mk f h : M →ₛₗ[σ] M₃) = f :=
rfl
variable (fₗ f g)
protected theorem map_add (x y : M) : f (x + y) = f x + f y :=
map_add f x y
protected theorem map_zero : f 0 = 0 :=
map_zero f
-- Porting note: `simp` wasn't picking up `map_smulₛₗ` for `LinearMap`s without specifying
-- `map_smulₛₗ f`, so we marked this as `@[simp]` in Mathlib3.
-- For Mathlib4, let's try without the `@[simp]` attribute and hope it won't need to be re-enabled.
-- This has to be re-tagged as `@[simp]` in https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/8386 (see also https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/3107).
@[simp]
protected theorem map_smulₛₗ (c : R) (x : M) : f (c • x) = σ c • f x :=
map_smulₛₗ f c x
protected theorem map_smul (c : R) (x : M) : fₗ (c • x) = c • fₗ x :=
map_smul fₗ c x
protected theorem map_smul_inv {σ' : S →+* R} [RingHomInvPair σ σ'] (c : S) (x : M) :
c • f x = f (σ' c • x) := by simp
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_zero_iff (h : Function.Injective f) {x : M} : f x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
_root_.map_eq_zero_iff f h
variable (M M₂)
/-- A typeclass for `SMul` structures which can be moved through a `LinearMap`.
This typeclass is generated automatically from an `IsScalarTower` instance, but exists so that
we can also add an instance for `AddCommGroup.toIntModule`, allowing `z •` to be moved even if
`S` does not support negation.
-/
class CompatibleSMul (R S : Type*) [Semiring S] [SMul R M] [Module S M] [SMul R M₂]
[Module S M₂] : Prop where
/-- Scalar multiplication by `R` of `M` can be moved through linear maps. -/
map_smul : ∀ (fₗ : M →ₗ[S] M₂) (c : R) (x : M), fₗ (c • x) = c • fₗ x
variable {M M₂}
section
variable {R S : Type*} [Semiring S] [SMul R M] [Module S M] [SMul R M₂] [Module S M₂]
instance (priority := 100) IsScalarTower.compatibleSMul [SMul R S]
[IsScalarTower R S M] [IsScalarTower R S M₂] :
CompatibleSMul M M₂ R S :=
⟨fun fₗ c x ↦ by rw [← smul_one_smul S c x, ← smul_one_smul S c (fₗ x), map_smul]⟩
instance IsScalarTower.compatibleSMul' [SMul R S] [IsScalarTower R S M] :
CompatibleSMul S M R S where
map_smul := (IsScalarTower.smulHomClass R S M (S →ₗ[S] M)).map_smulₛₗ
@[simp]
theorem map_smul_of_tower [CompatibleSMul M M₂ R S] (fₗ : M →ₗ[S] M₂) (c : R) (x : M) :
fₗ (c • x) = c • fₗ x :=
CompatibleSMul.map_smul fₗ c x
theorem _root_.LinearMapClass.map_smul_of_tower {F : Type*} [CompatibleSMul M M₂ R S]
[FunLike F M M₂] [LinearMapClass F S M M₂] (fₗ : F) (c : R) (x : M) :
fₗ (c • x) = c • fₗ x :=
LinearMap.CompatibleSMul.map_smul (fₗ : M →ₗ[S] M₂) c x
variable (R R) in
theorem isScalarTower_of_injective [SMul R S] [CompatibleSMul M M₂ R S] [IsScalarTower R S M₂]
(f : M →ₗ[S] M₂) (hf : Function.Injective f) : IsScalarTower R S M where
smul_assoc r s _ := hf <| by rw [f.map_smul_of_tower r, map_smul, map_smul, smul_assoc]
@[simp] lemma _root_.map_zsmul_unit {F M N : Type*}
[AddGroup M] [AddGroup N] [FunLike F M N] [AddMonoidHomClass F M N]
(f : F) (c : ℤˣ) (m : M) :
f (c • m) = c • f m := by
simp [Units.smul_def]
end
variable (R) in
theorem isLinearMap_of_compatibleSMul [Module S M] [Module S M₂] [CompatibleSMul M M₂ R S]
(f : M →ₗ[S] M₂) : IsLinearMap R f where
map_add := map_add f
map_smul := map_smul_of_tower f
/-- convert a linear map to an additive map -/
def toAddMonoidHom : M →+ M₃ where
toFun := f
map_zero' := f.map_zero
map_add' := f.map_add
@[simp]
theorem toAddMonoidHom_coe : ⇑f.toAddMonoidHom = f :=
rfl
section RestrictScalars
variable (R)
variable [Module S M] [Module S M₂] [CompatibleSMul M M₂ R S]
/-- If `M` and `M₂` are both `R`-modules and `S`-modules and `R`-module structures
are defined by an action of `R` on `S` (formally, we have two scalar towers), then any `S`-linear
map from `M` to `M₂` is `R`-linear.
See also `LinearMap.map_smul_of_tower`. -/
@[coe] def restrictScalars (fₗ : M →ₗ[S] M₂) : M →ₗ[R] M₂ where
toFun := fₗ
map_add' := fₗ.map_add
map_smul' := fₗ.map_smul_of_tower
instance coeIsScalarTower : CoeHTCT (M →ₗ[S] M₂) (M →ₗ[R] M₂) :=
⟨restrictScalars R⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_restrictScalars (f : M →ₗ[S] M₂) : ((f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : M → M₂) = f :=
rfl
theorem restrictScalars_apply (fₗ : M →ₗ[S] M₂) (x) : restrictScalars R fₗ x = fₗ x :=
rfl
theorem restrictScalars_injective :
Function.Injective (restrictScalars R : (M →ₗ[S] M₂) → M →ₗ[R] M₂) := fun _ _ h ↦
ext (LinearMap.congr_fun h :)
@[simp]
theorem restrictScalars_inj (fₗ gₗ : M →ₗ[S] M₂) :
fₗ.restrictScalars R = gₗ.restrictScalars R ↔ fₗ = gₗ :=
(restrictScalars_injective R).eq_iff
end RestrictScalars
theorem toAddMonoidHom_injective :
Function.Injective (toAddMonoidHom : (M →ₛₗ[σ] M₃) → M →+ M₃) := fun fₗ gₗ h ↦
ext <| (DFunLike.congr_fun h : ∀ x, fₗ.toAddMonoidHom x = gₗ.toAddMonoidHom x)
/-- If two `σ`-linear maps from `R` are equal on `1`, then they are equal. -/
@[ext high]
theorem ext_ring {f g : R →ₛₗ[σ] M₃} (h : f 1 = g 1) : f = g :=
ext fun x ↦ by rw [← mul_one x, ← smul_eq_mul, f.map_smulₛₗ, g.map_smulₛₗ, h]
end
/-- Interpret a `RingHom` `f` as an `f`-semilinear map. -/
@[simps]
def _root_.RingHom.toSemilinearMap (f : R →+* S) : R →ₛₗ[f] S :=
{ f with
map_smul' := f.map_mul }
@[simp] theorem _root_.RingHom.coe_toSemilinearMap (f : R →+* S) : ⇑f.toSemilinearMap = f := rfl
section
variable [Semiring R₁] [Semiring R₂] [Semiring R₃]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₁] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃]
variable {module_M₁ : Module R₁ M₁} {module_M₂ : Module R₂ M₂} {module_M₃ : Module R₃ M₃}
variable {σ₁₂ : R₁ →+* R₂} {σ₂₃ : R₂ →+* R₃} {σ₁₃ : R₁ →+* R₃}
/-- Composition of two linear maps is a linear map -/
def comp [RingHomCompTriple σ₁₂ σ₂₃ σ₁₃] (f : M₂ →ₛₗ[σ₂₃] M₃) (g : M₁ →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) :
M₁ →ₛₗ[σ₁₃] M₃ where
toFun := f ∘ g
map_add' := by simp only [map_add, forall_const, Function.comp_apply]
-- Note that https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/8386 changed `map_smulₛₗ` to `map_smulₛₗ _`
map_smul' r x := by simp only [Function.comp_apply, map_smulₛₗ _, RingHomCompTriple.comp_apply]
variable [RingHomCompTriple σ₁₂ σ₂₃ σ₁₃]
variable (f : M₂ →ₛₗ[σ₂₃] M₃) (g : M₁ →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂)
/-- `∘ₗ` is notation for composition of two linear (not semilinear!) maps into a linear map.
This is useful when Lean is struggling to infer the `RingHomCompTriple` instance. -/
notation3:80 (name := compNotation) f:81 " ∘ₗ " g:80 =>
LinearMap.comp (σ₁₂ := RingHom.id _) (σ₂₃ := RingHom.id _) (σ₁₃ := RingHom.id _) f g
@[inherit_doc] infixr:90 " ∘ₛₗ " => comp
theorem comp_apply (x : M₁) : f.comp g x = f (g x) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_comp : (f.comp g : M₁ → M₃) = f ∘ g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_id : f.comp id = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem id_comp : id.comp f = f :=
rfl
theorem comp_assoc
{R₄ M₄ : Type*} [Semiring R₄] [AddCommMonoid M₄] [Module R₄ M₄]
{σ₃₄ : R₃ →+* R₄} {σ₂₄ : R₂ →+* R₄} {σ₁₄ : R₁ →+* R₄}
[RingHomCompTriple σ₂₃ σ₃₄ σ₂₄] [RingHomCompTriple σ₁₃ σ₃₄ σ₁₄] [RingHomCompTriple σ₁₂ σ₂₄ σ₁₄]
(f : M₁ →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂) (g : M₂ →ₛₗ[σ₂₃] M₃) (h : M₃ →ₛₗ[σ₃₄] M₄) :
| ((h.comp g : M₂ →ₛₗ[σ₂₄] M₄).comp f : M₁ →ₛₗ[σ₁₄] M₄) = h.comp (g.comp f : M₁ →ₛₗ[σ₁₃] M₃) :=
rfl
variable {f g} {f' : M₂ →ₛₗ[σ₂₃] M₃} {g' : M₁ →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] M₂}
/-- The linear map version of `Function.Surjective.injective_comp_right` -/
lemma _root_.Function.Surjective.injective_linearMapComp_right (hg : Surjective g) :
Injective fun f : M₂ →ₛₗ[σ₂₃] M₃ ↦ f.comp g :=
fun _ _ h ↦ ext <| hg.forall.2 (LinearMap.ext_iff.1 h)
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/LinearMap/Defs.lean | 508 | 516 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Degree
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.WithTop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.WithTop
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.WithBot
/-!
# Degree of univariate polynomials
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.degree`: the degree of a polynomial, where `0` has degree `⊥`
* `Polynomial.natDegree`: the degree of a polynomial, where `0` has degree `0`
* `Polynomial.leadingCoeff`: the leading coefficient of a polynomial
* `Polynomial.Monic`: a polynomial is monic if its leading coefficient is 0
* `Polynomial.nextCoeff`: the next coefficient after the leading coefficient
## Main results
* `Polynomial.degree_eq_natDegree`: the degree and natDegree coincide for nonzero polynomials
-/
noncomputable section
open Finsupp Finset
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {a b c d : R} {n m : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
/-- `degree p` is the degree of the polynomial `p`, i.e. the largest `X`-exponent in `p`.
`degree p = some n` when `p ≠ 0` and `n` is the highest power of `X` that appears in `p`, otherwise
`degree 0 = ⊥`. -/
def degree (p : R[X]) : WithBot ℕ :=
p.support.max
/-- `natDegree p` forces `degree p` to ℕ, by defining `natDegree 0 = 0`. -/
def natDegree (p : R[X]) : ℕ :=
(degree p).unbotD 0
/-- `leadingCoeff p` gives the coefficient of the highest power of `X` in `p`. -/
def leadingCoeff (p : R[X]) : R :=
coeff p (natDegree p)
/-- a polynomial is `Monic` if its leading coefficient is 1 -/
def Monic (p : R[X]) :=
leadingCoeff p = (1 : R)
theorem Monic.def : Monic p ↔ leadingCoeff p = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
instance Monic.decidable [DecidableEq R] : Decidable (Monic p) := by unfold Monic; infer_instance
@[simp]
theorem Monic.leadingCoeff {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) : leadingCoeff p = 1 :=
hp
theorem Monic.coeff_natDegree {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) : p.coeff p.natDegree = 1 :=
hp
@[simp]
theorem degree_zero : degree (0 : R[X]) = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_zero : natDegree (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coeff_natDegree : coeff p (natDegree p) = leadingCoeff p :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem degree_eq_bot : degree p = ⊥ ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨fun h => support_eq_empty.1 (Finset.max_eq_bot.1 h), fun h => h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
theorem degree_ne_bot : degree p ≠ ⊥ ↔ p ≠ 0 := degree_eq_bot.not
theorem degree_eq_natDegree (hp : p ≠ 0) : degree p = (natDegree p : WithBot ℕ) := by
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := not_forall.1 (mt Option.eq_none_iff_forall_not_mem.2 (mt degree_eq_bot.1 hp))
have hn : degree p = some n := Classical.not_not.1 hn
rw [natDegree, hn]; rfl
theorem degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
p.degree = n ↔ p.natDegree = n := by rw [degree_eq_natDegree hp]; exact WithBot.coe_eq_coe
theorem degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq_of_pos {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
p.degree = n ↔ p.natDegree = n := by
obtain rfl|h := eq_or_ne p 0
· simp [hn.ne]
· exact degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq h
theorem natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (h : degree p = n) : natDegree p = n := by
rw [natDegree, h, Nat.cast_withBot, WithBot.unbotD_coe]
theorem degree_ne_of_natDegree_ne {n : ℕ} : p.natDegree ≠ n → degree p ≠ n :=
mt natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some
@[simp]
theorem degree_le_natDegree : degree p ≤ natDegree p :=
WithBot.giUnbotDBot.gc.le_u_l _
theorem natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq [Semiring S] {q : S[X]} (h : degree p = degree q) :
natDegree p = natDegree q := by unfold natDegree; rw [h]
theorem le_degree_of_ne_zero (h : coeff p n ≠ 0) : (n : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree p := by
rw [Nat.cast_withBot]
exact Finset.le_sup (mem_support_iff.2 h)
theorem degree_mono [Semiring S] {f : R[X]} {g : S[X]} (h : f.support ⊆ g.support) :
f.degree ≤ g.degree :=
Finset.sup_mono h
theorem degree_le_degree (h : coeff q (natDegree p) ≠ 0) : degree p ≤ degree q := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [hp, degree_zero]
exact bot_le
· rw [degree_eq_natDegree hp]
exact le_degree_of_ne_zero h
theorem natDegree_le_iff_degree_le {n : ℕ} : natDegree p ≤ n ↔ degree p ≤ n :=
WithBot.unbotD_le_iff (fun _ ↦ bot_le)
theorem natDegree_lt_iff_degree_lt (hp : p ≠ 0) : p.natDegree < n ↔ p.degree < ↑n :=
WithBot.unbotD_lt_iff (absurd · (degree_eq_bot.not.mpr hp))
alias ⟨degree_le_of_natDegree_le, natDegree_le_of_degree_le⟩ := natDegree_le_iff_degree_le
theorem natDegree_le_natDegree [Semiring S] {q : S[X]} (hpq : p.degree ≤ q.degree) :
p.natDegree ≤ q.natDegree :=
WithBot.giUnbotDBot.gc.monotone_l hpq
@[simp]
theorem degree_C (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (C a) = (0 : WithBot ℕ) := by
rw [degree, ← monomial_zero_left, support_monomial 0 ha, max_eq_sup_coe, sup_singleton,
WithBot.coe_zero]
theorem degree_C_le : degree (C a) ≤ 0 := by
by_cases h : a = 0
· rw [h, C_0]
exact bot_le
· rw [degree_C h]
theorem degree_C_lt : degree (C a) < 1 :=
degree_C_le.trans_lt <| WithBot.coe_lt_coe.mpr zero_lt_one
theorem degree_one_le : degree (1 : R[X]) ≤ (0 : WithBot ℕ) := by rw [← C_1]; exact degree_C_le
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_C (a : R) : natDegree (C a) = 0 := by
by_cases ha : a = 0
· have : C a = 0 := by rw [ha, C_0]
rw [natDegree, degree_eq_bot.2 this, WithBot.unbotD_bot]
· rw [natDegree, degree_C ha, WithBot.unbotD_zero]
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_one : natDegree (1 : R[X]) = 0 :=
natDegree_C 1
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_natCast (n : ℕ) : natDegree (n : R[X]) = 0 := by
simp only [← C_eq_natCast, natDegree_C]
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_ofNat (n : ℕ) [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] :
natDegree (ofNat(n) : R[X]) = 0 :=
natDegree_natCast _
theorem degree_natCast_le (n : ℕ) : degree (n : R[X]) ≤ 0 := degree_le_of_natDegree_le (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem degree_monomial (n : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (monomial n a) = n := by
rw [degree, support_monomial n ha, max_singleton, Nat.cast_withBot]
@[simp]
theorem degree_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (C a * X ^ n) = n := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, degree_monomial n ha]
theorem degree_C_mul_X (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (C a * X) = 1 := by
simpa only [pow_one] using degree_C_mul_X_pow 1 ha
theorem degree_monomial_le (n : ℕ) (a : R) : degree (monomial n a) ≤ n :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if h : a = 0 then by rw [h, (monomial n).map_zero, degree_zero]; exact bot_le
else le_of_eq (degree_monomial n h)
theorem degree_C_mul_X_pow_le (n : ℕ) (a : R) : degree (C a * X ^ n) ≤ n := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]
apply degree_monomial_le
theorem degree_C_mul_X_le (a : R) : degree (C a * X) ≤ 1 := by
simpa only [pow_one] using degree_C_mul_X_pow_le 1 a
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (a : R) (ha : a ≠ 0) : natDegree (C a * X ^ n) = n :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some (degree_C_mul_X_pow n ha)
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_C_mul_X (a : R) (ha : a ≠ 0) : natDegree (C a * X) = 1 := by
simpa only [pow_one] using natDegree_C_mul_X_pow 1 a ha
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_monomial [DecidableEq R] (i : ℕ) (r : R) :
natDegree (monomial i r) = if r = 0 then 0 else i := by
split_ifs with hr
· simp [hr]
· rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, natDegree_C_mul_X_pow i r hr]
theorem natDegree_monomial_le (a : R) {m : ℕ} : (monomial m a).natDegree ≤ m := by
classical
rw [Polynomial.natDegree_monomial]
split_ifs
exacts [Nat.zero_le _, le_rfl]
theorem natDegree_monomial_eq (i : ℕ) {r : R} (r0 : r ≠ 0) : (monomial i r).natDegree = i :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
Eq.trans (natDegree_monomial _ _) (if_neg r0)
theorem coeff_ne_zero_of_eq_degree (hn : degree p = n) : coeff p n ≠ 0 := fun h =>
mem_support_iff.mp (mem_of_max hn) h
theorem degree_X_pow_le (n : ℕ) : degree (X ^ n : R[X]) ≤ n := by
simpa only [C_1, one_mul] using degree_C_mul_X_pow_le n (1 : R)
theorem degree_X_le : degree (X : R[X]) ≤ 1 :=
degree_monomial_le _ _
theorem natDegree_X_le : (X : R[X]).natDegree ≤ 1 :=
natDegree_le_of_degree_le degree_X_le
theorem withBotSucc_degree_eq_natDegree_add_one (h : p ≠ 0) : p.degree.succ = p.natDegree + 1 := by
rw [degree_eq_natDegree h]
exact WithBot.succ_coe p.natDegree
end Semiring
section NonzeroSemiring
variable [Semiring R] [Nontrivial R] {p q : R[X]}
@[simp]
theorem degree_one : degree (1 : R[X]) = (0 : WithBot ℕ) :=
degree_C one_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem degree_X : degree (X : R[X]) = 1 :=
degree_monomial _ one_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_X : (X : R[X]).natDegree = 1 :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some degree_X
end NonzeroSemiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R]
@[simp]
theorem degree_neg (p : R[X]) : degree (-p) = degree p := by unfold degree; rw [support_neg]
theorem degree_neg_le_of_le {a : WithBot ℕ} {p : R[X]} (hp : degree p ≤ a) : degree (-p) ≤ a :=
p.degree_neg.le.trans hp
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_neg (p : R[X]) : natDegree (-p) = natDegree p := by simp [natDegree]
theorem natDegree_neg_le_of_le {p : R[X]} (hp : natDegree p ≤ m) : natDegree (-p) ≤ m :=
(natDegree_neg p).le.trans hp
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_intCast (n : ℤ) : natDegree (n : R[X]) = 0 := by
rw [← C_eq_intCast, natDegree_C]
theorem degree_intCast_le (n : ℤ) : degree (n : R[X]) ≤ 0 := degree_le_of_natDegree_le (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_neg (p : R[X]) : (-p).leadingCoeff = -p.leadingCoeff := by
rw [leadingCoeff, leadingCoeff, natDegree_neg, coeff_neg]
end Ring
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p : R[X]}
/-- The second-highest coefficient, or 0 for constants -/
def nextCoeff (p : R[X]) : R :=
if p.natDegree = 0 then 0 else p.coeff (p.natDegree - 1)
lemma nextCoeff_eq_zero :
p.nextCoeff = 0 ↔ p.natDegree = 0 ∨ 0 < p.natDegree ∧ p.coeff (p.natDegree - 1) = 0 := by
simp [nextCoeff, or_iff_not_imp_left, pos_iff_ne_zero]; aesop
lemma nextCoeff_ne_zero : p.nextCoeff ≠ 0 ↔ p.natDegree ≠ 0 ∧ p.coeff (p.natDegree - 1) ≠ 0 := by
simp [nextCoeff]
@[simp]
theorem nextCoeff_C_eq_zero (c : R) : nextCoeff (C c) = 0 := by
rw [nextCoeff]
simp
theorem nextCoeff_of_natDegree_pos (hp : 0 < p.natDegree) :
nextCoeff p = p.coeff (p.natDegree - 1) := by
rw [nextCoeff, if_neg]
contrapose! hp
simpa
variable {p q : R[X]} {ι : Type*}
theorem degree_add_le (p q : R[X]) : degree (p + q) ≤ max (degree p) (degree q) := by
simpa only [degree, ← support_toFinsupp, toFinsupp_add]
using AddMonoidAlgebra.sup_support_add_le _ _ _
theorem degree_add_le_of_degree_le {p q : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : degree p ≤ n) (hq : degree q ≤ n) :
degree (p + q) ≤ n :=
(degree_add_le p q).trans <| max_le hp hq
theorem degree_add_le_of_le {a b : WithBot ℕ} (hp : degree p ≤ a) (hq : degree q ≤ b) :
degree (p + q) ≤ max a b :=
(p.degree_add_le q).trans <| max_le_max ‹_› ‹_›
theorem natDegree_add_le (p q : R[X]) : natDegree (p + q) ≤ max (natDegree p) (natDegree q) := by
rcases le_max_iff.1 (degree_add_le p q) with h | h <;> simp [natDegree_le_natDegree h]
theorem natDegree_add_le_of_degree_le {p q : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : natDegree p ≤ n)
(hq : natDegree q ≤ n) : natDegree (p + q) ≤ n :=
(natDegree_add_le p q).trans <| max_le hp hq
theorem natDegree_add_le_of_le (hp : natDegree p ≤ m) (hq : natDegree q ≤ n) :
natDegree (p + q) ≤ max m n :=
(p.natDegree_add_le q).trans <| max_le_max ‹_› ‹_›
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_zero : leadingCoeff (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_eq_zero : leadingCoeff p = 0 ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨fun h =>
Classical.by_contradiction fun hp =>
mt mem_support_iff.1 (Classical.not_not.2 h) (mem_of_max (degree_eq_natDegree hp)),
fun h => h.symm ▸ leadingCoeff_zero⟩
theorem leadingCoeff_ne_zero : leadingCoeff p ≠ 0 ↔ p ≠ 0 := by rw [Ne, leadingCoeff_eq_zero]
theorem leadingCoeff_eq_zero_iff_deg_eq_bot : leadingCoeff p = 0 ↔ degree p = ⊥ := by
rw [leadingCoeff_eq_zero, degree_eq_bot]
theorem natDegree_C_mul_X_pow_le (a : R) (n : ℕ) : natDegree (C a * X ^ n) ≤ n :=
natDegree_le_iff_degree_le.2 <| degree_C_mul_X_pow_le _ _
theorem degree_erase_le (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : degree (p.erase n) ≤ degree p := by
rcases p with ⟨p⟩
simp only [erase_def, degree, coeff, support]
apply sup_mono
rw [Finsupp.support_erase]
apply Finset.erase_subset
theorem degree_erase_lt (hp : p ≠ 0) : degree (p.erase (natDegree p)) < degree p := by
apply lt_of_le_of_ne (degree_erase_le _ _)
rw [degree_eq_natDegree hp, degree, support_erase]
exact fun h => not_mem_erase _ _ (mem_of_max h)
theorem degree_update_le (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (a : R) : degree (p.update n a) ≤ max (degree p) n := by
classical
rw [degree, support_update]
split_ifs
· exact (Finset.max_mono (erase_subset _ _)).trans (le_max_left _ _)
· rw [max_insert, max_comm]
exact le_rfl
theorem degree_sum_le (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) :
degree (∑ i ∈ s, f i) ≤ s.sup fun b => degree (f b) :=
Finset.cons_induction_on s (by simp only [sum_empty, sup_empty, degree_zero, le_refl])
fun a s has ih =>
calc
degree (∑ i ∈ cons a s has, f i) ≤ max (degree (f a)) (degree (∑ i ∈ s, f i)) := by
rw [Finset.sum_cons]; exact degree_add_le _ _
_ ≤ _ := by rw [sup_cons]; exact max_le_max le_rfl ih
theorem degree_mul_le (p q : R[X]) : degree (p * q) ≤ degree p + degree q := by
simpa only [degree, ← support_toFinsupp, toFinsupp_mul]
using AddMonoidAlgebra.sup_support_mul_le (WithBot.coe_add _ _).le _ _
theorem degree_mul_le_of_le {a b : WithBot ℕ} (hp : degree p ≤ a) (hq : degree q ≤ b) :
degree (p * q) ≤ a + b :=
(p.degree_mul_le _).trans <| add_le_add ‹_› ‹_›
theorem degree_pow_le (p : R[X]) : ∀ n : ℕ, degree (p ^ n) ≤ n • degree p
| 0 => by rw [pow_zero, zero_nsmul]; exact degree_one_le
| n + 1 =>
calc
degree (p ^ (n + 1)) ≤ degree (p ^ n) + degree p := by
rw [pow_succ]; exact degree_mul_le _ _
_ ≤ _ := by rw [succ_nsmul]; exact add_le_add_right (degree_pow_le _ _) _
theorem degree_pow_le_of_le {a : WithBot ℕ} (b : ℕ) (hp : degree p ≤ a) :
degree (p ^ b) ≤ b * a := by
induction b with
| zero => simp [degree_one_le]
| succ n hn =>
rw [Nat.cast_succ, add_mul, one_mul, pow_succ]
exact degree_mul_le_of_le hn hp
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_monomial (a : R) (n : ℕ) : leadingCoeff (monomial n a) = a := by
classical
by_cases ha : a = 0
· simp only [ha, (monomial n).map_zero, leadingCoeff_zero]
· rw [leadingCoeff, natDegree_monomial, if_neg ha, coeff_monomial]
simp
theorem leadingCoeff_C_mul_X_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) : leadingCoeff (C a * X ^ n) = a := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, leadingCoeff_monomial]
theorem leadingCoeff_C_mul_X (a : R) : leadingCoeff (C a * X) = a := by
simpa only [pow_one] using leadingCoeff_C_mul_X_pow a 1
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_C (a : R) : leadingCoeff (C a) = a :=
leadingCoeff_monomial a 0
theorem leadingCoeff_X_pow (n : ℕ) : leadingCoeff ((X : R[X]) ^ n) = 1 := by
simpa only [C_1, one_mul] using leadingCoeff_C_mul_X_pow (1 : R) n
theorem leadingCoeff_X : leadingCoeff (X : R[X]) = 1 := by
simpa only [pow_one] using @leadingCoeff_X_pow R _ 1
@[simp]
theorem monic_X_pow (n : ℕ) : Monic (X ^ n : R[X]) :=
leadingCoeff_X_pow n
@[simp]
theorem monic_X : Monic (X : R[X]) :=
leadingCoeff_X
theorem leadingCoeff_one : leadingCoeff (1 : R[X]) = 1 :=
leadingCoeff_C 1
@[simp]
theorem monic_one : Monic (1 : R[X]) :=
leadingCoeff_C _
theorem Monic.ne_zero {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [Nontrivial R] {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) :
p ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
simp [Monic] at hp
theorem Monic.ne_zero_of_ne (h : (0 : R) ≠ 1) {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) : p ≠ 0 := by
nontriviality R
exact hp.ne_zero
theorem Monic.ne_zero_of_polynomial_ne {r} (hp : Monic p) (hne : q ≠ r) : p ≠ 0 :=
haveI := Nontrivial.of_polynomial_ne hne
hp.ne_zero
theorem natDegree_mul_le {p q : R[X]} : natDegree (p * q) ≤ natDegree p + natDegree q := by
apply natDegree_le_of_degree_le
apply le_trans (degree_mul_le p q)
rw [Nat.cast_add]
apply add_le_add <;> apply degree_le_natDegree
theorem natDegree_mul_le_of_le (hp : natDegree p ≤ m) (hg : natDegree q ≤ n) :
natDegree (p * q) ≤ m + n :=
natDegree_mul_le.trans <| add_le_add ‹_› ‹_›
theorem natDegree_pow_le {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} : (p ^ n).natDegree ≤ n * p.natDegree := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ i hi =>
rw [pow_succ, Nat.succ_mul]
apply le_trans natDegree_mul_le (add_le_add_right hi _)
theorem natDegree_pow_le_of_le (n : ℕ) (hp : natDegree p ≤ m) :
natDegree (p ^ n) ≤ n * m :=
natDegree_pow_le.trans (Nat.mul_le_mul le_rfl ‹_›)
theorem natDegree_eq_zero_iff_degree_le_zero : p.natDegree = 0 ↔ p.degree ≤ 0 := by
rw [← nonpos_iff_eq_zero, natDegree_le_iff_degree_le, Nat.cast_zero]
theorem degree_zero_le : degree (0 : R[X]) ≤ 0 := natDegree_eq_zero_iff_degree_le_zero.mp rfl
theorem degree_le_iff_coeff_zero (f : R[X]) (n : WithBot ℕ) :
degree f ≤ n ↔ ∀ m : ℕ, n < m → coeff f m = 0 := by
simp only [degree, Finset.max, Finset.sup_le_iff, mem_support_iff, Ne, ← not_le,
not_imp_comm, Nat.cast_withBot]
theorem degree_lt_iff_coeff_zero (f : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
degree f < n ↔ ∀ m : ℕ, n ≤ m → coeff f m = 0 := by
simp only [degree, Finset.sup_lt_iff (WithBot.bot_lt_coe n), mem_support_iff,
WithBot.coe_lt_coe, ← @not_le ℕ, max_eq_sup_coe, Nat.cast_withBot, Ne, not_imp_not]
theorem natDegree_pos_iff_degree_pos : 0 < natDegree p ↔ 0 < degree p :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le natDegree_le_iff_degree_le
end Semiring
section NontrivialSemiring
variable [Semiring R] [Nontrivial R] {p q : R[X]} (n : ℕ)
@[simp]
theorem degree_X_pow : degree ((X : R[X]) ^ n) = n := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, degree_monomial _ (one_ne_zero' R)]
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_X_pow : natDegree ((X : R[X]) ^ n) = n :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some (degree_X_pow n)
end NontrivialSemiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem degree_sub_le (p q : R[X]) : degree (p - q) ≤ max (degree p) (degree q) := by
simpa only [degree_neg q] using degree_add_le p (-q)
theorem degree_sub_le_of_le {a b : WithBot ℕ} (hp : degree p ≤ a) (hq : degree q ≤ b) :
degree (p - q) ≤ max a b :=
(p.degree_sub_le q).trans <| max_le_max ‹_› ‹_›
theorem natDegree_sub_le (p q : R[X]) : natDegree (p - q) ≤ max (natDegree p) (natDegree q) := by
simpa only [← natDegree_neg q] using natDegree_add_le p (-q)
theorem natDegree_sub_le_of_le (hp : natDegree p ≤ m) (hq : natDegree q ≤ n) :
natDegree (p - q) ≤ max m n :=
(p.natDegree_sub_le q).trans <| max_le_max ‹_› ‹_›
theorem degree_sub_lt (hd : degree p = degree q) (hp0 : p ≠ 0)
(hlc : leadingCoeff p = leadingCoeff q) : degree (p - q) < degree p :=
have hp : monomial (natDegree p) (leadingCoeff p) + p.erase (natDegree p) = p :=
monomial_add_erase _ _
have hq : monomial (natDegree q) (leadingCoeff q) + q.erase (natDegree q) = q :=
monomial_add_erase _ _
have hd' : natDegree p = natDegree q := by unfold natDegree; rw [hd]
have hq0 : q ≠ 0 := mt degree_eq_bot.2 (hd ▸ mt degree_eq_bot.1 hp0)
calc
degree (p - q) = degree (erase (natDegree q) p + -erase (natDegree q) q) := by
conv =>
lhs
rw [← hp, ← hq, hlc, hd', add_sub_add_left_eq_sub, sub_eq_add_neg]
_ ≤ max (degree (erase (natDegree q) p)) (degree (erase (natDegree q) q)) :=
(degree_neg (erase (natDegree q) q) ▸ degree_add_le _ _)
_ < degree p := max_lt_iff.2 ⟨hd' ▸ degree_erase_lt hp0, hd.symm ▸ degree_erase_lt hq0⟩
theorem degree_X_sub_C_le (r : R) : (X - C r).degree ≤ 1 :=
(degree_sub_le _ _).trans (max_le degree_X_le (degree_C_le.trans zero_le_one))
theorem natDegree_X_sub_C_le (r : R) : (X - C r).natDegree ≤ 1 :=
natDegree_le_iff_degree_le.2 <| degree_X_sub_C_le r
end Ring
end Polynomial
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Degree/Definitions.lean | 790 | 795 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Kyle Miller. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kyle Miller
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Finite
/-!
# Cardinality of finite types
The cardinality of a finite type `α` is given by `Nat.card α`. This function has
the "junk value" of `0` for infinite types, but to ensure the function has valid
output, one just needs to know that it's possible to produce a `Finite` instance
for the type. (Note: we could have defined a `Finite.card` that required you to
supply a `Finite` instance, but (a) the function would be `noncomputable` anyway
so there is no need to supply the instance and (b) the function would have a more
complicated dependent type that easily leads to "motive not type correct" errors.)
## Implementation notes
Theorems about `Nat.card` are sometimes incidentally true for both finite and infinite
types. If removing a finiteness constraint results in no loss in legibility, we remove
it. We generally put such theorems into the `SetTheory.Cardinal.Finite` module.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
noncomputable section
variable {α β γ : Type*}
/-- There is (noncomputably) an equivalence between a finite type `α` and `Fin (Nat.card α)`. -/
def Finite.equivFin (α : Type*) [Finite α] : α ≃ Fin (Nat.card α) := by
have := (Finite.exists_equiv_fin α).choose_spec.some
rwa [Nat.card_eq_of_equiv_fin this]
/-- Similar to `Finite.equivFin` but with control over the term used for the cardinality. -/
def Finite.equivFinOfCardEq [Finite α] {n : ℕ} (h : Nat.card α = n) : α ≃ Fin n := by
subst h
apply Finite.equivFin
open scoped Classical in
theorem Nat.card_eq (α : Type*) :
Nat.card α = if _ : Finite α then @Fintype.card α (Fintype.ofFinite α) else 0 := by
cases finite_or_infinite α
· letI := Fintype.ofFinite α
simp only [this, *, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, dif_pos]
· simp only [*, card_eq_zero_of_infinite, not_finite_iff_infinite.mpr, dite_false]
theorem Finite.card_pos_iff [Finite α] : 0 < Nat.card α ↔ Nonempty α := by
haveI := Fintype.ofFinite α
rw [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, Fintype.card_pos_iff]
theorem Finite.card_pos [Finite α] [h : Nonempty α] : 0 < Nat.card α :=
Finite.card_pos_iff.mpr h
namespace Finite
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")] alias cast_card_eq_mk := Nat.cast_card
theorem card_eq [Finite α] [Finite β] : Nat.card α = Nat.card β ↔ Nonempty (α ≃ β) := by
haveI := Fintype.ofFinite α
haveI := Fintype.ofFinite β
simp only [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, Fintype.card_eq]
theorem card_le_one_iff_subsingleton [Finite α] : Nat.card α ≤ 1 ↔ Subsingleton α := by
haveI := Fintype.ofFinite α
simp only [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, Fintype.card_le_one_iff_subsingleton]
theorem one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial [Finite α] : 1 < Nat.card α ↔ Nontrivial α := by
haveI := Fintype.ofFinite α
simp only [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, Fintype.one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial]
theorem one_lt_card [Finite α] [h : Nontrivial α] : 1 < Nat.card α :=
one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial.mpr h
@[simp]
theorem card_option [Finite α] : Nat.card (Option α) = Nat.card α + 1 := by
haveI := Fintype.ofFinite α
simp only [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, Fintype.card_option]
theorem card_le_of_injective [Finite β] (f : α → β) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Nat.card α ≤ Nat.card β := by
haveI := Fintype.ofFinite β
haveI := Fintype.ofInjective f hf
simpa only [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card] using Fintype.card_le_of_injective f hf
theorem card_le_of_embedding [Finite β] (f : α ↪ β) : Nat.card α ≤ Nat.card β :=
card_le_of_injective _ f.injective
theorem card_le_of_surjective [Finite α] (f : α → β) (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
Nat.card β ≤ Nat.card α := by
classical
haveI := Fintype.ofFinite α
haveI := Fintype.ofSurjective f hf
simpa only [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card] using Fintype.card_le_of_surjective f hf
theorem card_eq_zero_iff [Finite α] : Nat.card α = 0 ↔ IsEmpty α := by
haveI := Fintype.ofFinite α
simp only [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, Fintype.card_eq_zero_iff]
/-- If `f` is injective, then `Nat.card α ≤ Nat.card β`. We must also assume
`Nat.card β = 0 → Nat.card α = 0` since `Nat.card` is defined to be `0` for infinite types. -/
theorem card_le_of_injective' {f : α → β} (hf : Function.Injective f)
(h : Nat.card β = 0 → Nat.card α = 0) : Nat.card α ≤ Nat.card β :=
(or_not_of_imp h).casesOn (fun h => le_of_eq_of_le h (Nat.zero_le _)) fun h =>
@card_le_of_injective α β (Nat.finite_of_card_ne_zero h) f hf
/-- If `f` is an embedding, then `Nat.card α ≤ Nat.card β`. We must also assume
`Nat.card β = 0 → Nat.card α = 0` since `Nat.card` is defined to be `0` for infinite types. -/
theorem card_le_of_embedding' (f : α ↪ β) (h : Nat.card β = 0 → Nat.card α = 0) :
Nat.card α ≤ Nat.card β :=
card_le_of_injective' f.2 h
/-- If `f` is surjective, then `Nat.card β ≤ Nat.card α`. We must also assume
`Nat.card α = 0 → Nat.card β = 0` since `Nat.card` is defined to be `0` for infinite types. -/
theorem card_le_of_surjective' {f : α → β} (hf : Function.Surjective f)
(h : Nat.card α = 0 → Nat.card β = 0) : Nat.card β ≤ Nat.card α :=
(or_not_of_imp h).casesOn (fun h => le_of_eq_of_le h (Nat.zero_le _)) fun h =>
@card_le_of_surjective α β (Nat.finite_of_card_ne_zero h) f hf
/-- NB: `Nat.card` is defined to be `0` for infinite types. -/
theorem card_eq_zero_of_surjective {f : α → β} (hf : Function.Surjective f) (h : Nat.card β = 0) :
Nat.card α = 0 := by
cases finite_or_infinite β
· haveI := card_eq_zero_iff.mp h
haveI := Function.isEmpty f
exact Nat.card_of_isEmpty
· haveI := Infinite.of_surjective f hf
exact Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite
/-- NB: `Nat.card` is defined to be `0` for infinite types. -/
theorem card_eq_zero_of_injective [Nonempty α] {f : α → β} (hf : Function.Injective f)
(h : Nat.card α = 0) : Nat.card β = 0 :=
card_eq_zero_of_surjective (Function.invFun_surjective hf) h
/-- NB: `Nat.card` is defined to be `0` for infinite types. -/
theorem card_eq_zero_of_embedding [Nonempty α] (f : α ↪ β) (h : Nat.card α = 0) : Nat.card β = 0 :=
card_eq_zero_of_injective f.2 h
theorem card_sum [Finite α] [Finite β] : Nat.card (α ⊕ β) = Nat.card α + Nat.card β := by
haveI := Fintype.ofFinite α
haveI := Fintype.ofFinite β
simp only [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, Fintype.card_sum]
theorem card_image_le {s : Set α} [Finite s] (f : α → β) : Nat.card (f '' s) ≤ Nat.card s :=
card_le_of_surjective _ Set.surjective_onto_image
theorem card_range_le [Finite α] (f : α → β) : Nat.card (Set.range f) ≤ Nat.card α :=
card_le_of_surjective _ Set.surjective_onto_range
theorem card_subtype_le [Finite α] (p : α → Prop) : Nat.card { x // p x } ≤ Nat.card α := by
classical
haveI := Fintype.ofFinite α
simpa only [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card] using Fintype.card_subtype_le p
theorem card_subtype_lt [Finite α] {p : α → Prop} {x : α} (hx : ¬p x) :
Nat.card { x // p x } < Nat.card α := by
classical
haveI := Fintype.ofFinite α
simpa only [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, gt_iff_lt] using Fintype.card_subtype_lt hx
end Finite
namespace ENat
theorem card_eq_coe_natCard (α : Type*) [Finite α] : card α = Nat.card α := by
unfold ENat.card
apply symm
rw [Cardinal.natCast_eq_toENat_iff]
exact Nat.cast_card
end ENat
namespace Set
theorem card_union_le (s t : Set α) : Nat.card (↥(s ∪ t)) ≤ Nat.card s + Nat.card t := by
| rcases _root_.finite_or_infinite (↥(s ∪ t)) with h | h
· rw [finite_coe_iff, finite_union, ← finite_coe_iff, ← finite_coe_iff] at h
cases h
| Mathlib/Data/Finite/Card.lean | 180 | 182 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Martin Zinkevich. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Martin Zinkevich, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Encodable.Lattice
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.Disjointed
/-!
# Induction principles for measurable sets, related to π-systems and λ-systems.
## Main statements
* The main theorem of this file is Dynkin's π-λ theorem, which appears
here as an induction principle `induction_on_inter`. Suppose `s` is a
collection of subsets of `α` such that the intersection of two members
of `s` belongs to `s` whenever it is nonempty. Let `m` be the σ-algebra
generated by `s`. In order to check that a predicate `C` holds on every
member of `m`, it suffices to check that `C` holds on the members of `s` and
that `C` is preserved by complementation and *disjoint* countable
unions.
* The proof of this theorem relies on the notion of `IsPiSystem`, i.e., a collection of sets
which is closed under binary non-empty intersections. Note that this is a small variation around
the usual notion in the literature, which often requires that a π-system is non-empty, and closed
also under disjoint intersections. This variation turns out to be convenient for the
formalization.
* The proof of Dynkin's π-λ theorem also requires the notion of `DynkinSystem`, i.e., a collection
of sets which contains the empty set, is closed under complementation and under countable union
of pairwise disjoint sets. The disjointness condition is the only difference with `σ`-algebras.
* `generatePiSystem g` gives the minimal π-system containing `g`.
This can be considered a Galois insertion into both measurable spaces and sets.
* `generateFrom_generatePiSystem_eq` proves that if you start from a collection of sets `g`,
take the generated π-system, and then the generated σ-algebra, you get the same result as
the σ-algebra generated from `g`. This is useful because there are connections between
independent sets that are π-systems and the generated independent spaces.
* `mem_generatePiSystem_iUnion_elim` and `mem_generatePiSystem_iUnion_elim'` show that any
element of the π-system generated from the union of a set of π-systems can be
represented as the intersection of a finite number of elements from these sets.
* `piiUnionInter` defines a new π-system from a family of π-systems `π : ι → Set (Set α)` and a
set of indices `S : Set ι`. `piiUnionInter π S` is the set of sets that can be written
as `⋂ x ∈ t, f x` for some finset `t ∈ S` and sets `f x ∈ π x`.
## Implementation details
* `IsPiSystem` is a predicate, not a type. Thus, we don't explicitly define the galois
insertion, nor do we define a complete lattice. In theory, we could define a complete
lattice and galois insertion on the subtype corresponding to `IsPiSystem`.
-/
open MeasurableSpace Set
open MeasureTheory
variable {α β : Type*}
/-- A π-system is a collection of subsets of `α` that is closed under binary intersection of
non-disjoint sets. Usually it is also required that the collection is nonempty, but we don't do
that here. -/
def IsPiSystem (C : Set (Set α)) : Prop :=
∀ᵉ (s ∈ C) (t ∈ C), (s ∩ t : Set α).Nonempty → s ∩ t ∈ C
namespace MeasurableSpace
theorem isPiSystem_measurableSet {α : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] :
IsPiSystem { s : Set α | MeasurableSet s } := fun _ hs _ ht _ => hs.inter ht
end MeasurableSpace
theorem IsPiSystem.singleton (S : Set α) : IsPiSystem ({S} : Set (Set α)) := by
intro s h_s t h_t _
rw [Set.mem_singleton_iff.1 h_s, Set.mem_singleton_iff.1 h_t, Set.inter_self,
Set.mem_singleton_iff]
theorem IsPiSystem.insert_empty {S : Set (Set α)} (h_pi : IsPiSystem S) :
IsPiSystem (insert ∅ S) := by
intro s hs t ht hst
rcases hs with hs | hs
· simp [hs]
· rcases ht with ht | ht
· simp [ht]
· exact Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (h_pi s hs t ht hst)
theorem IsPiSystem.insert_univ {S : Set (Set α)} (h_pi : IsPiSystem S) :
IsPiSystem (insert Set.univ S) := by
intro s hs t ht hst
rcases hs with hs | hs
· rcases ht with ht | ht <;> simp [hs, ht]
· rcases ht with ht | ht
· simp [hs, ht]
· exact Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (h_pi s hs t ht hst)
theorem IsPiSystem.comap {α β} {S : Set (Set β)} (h_pi : IsPiSystem S) (f : α → β) :
IsPiSystem { s : Set α | ∃ t ∈ S, f ⁻¹' t = s } := by
rintro _ ⟨s, hs_mem, rfl⟩ _ ⟨t, ht_mem, rfl⟩ hst
rw [← Set.preimage_inter] at hst ⊢
exact ⟨s ∩ t, h_pi s hs_mem t ht_mem (nonempty_of_nonempty_preimage hst), rfl⟩
theorem isPiSystem_iUnion_of_directed_le {α ι} (p : ι → Set (Set α))
(hp_pi : ∀ n, IsPiSystem (p n)) (hp_directed : Directed (· ≤ ·) p) :
IsPiSystem (⋃ n, p n) := by
intro t1 ht1 t2 ht2 h
rw [Set.mem_iUnion] at ht1 ht2 ⊢
obtain ⟨n, ht1⟩ := ht1
obtain ⟨m, ht2⟩ := ht2
obtain ⟨k, hpnk, hpmk⟩ : ∃ k, p n ≤ p k ∧ p m ≤ p k := hp_directed n m
exact ⟨k, hp_pi k t1 (hpnk ht1) t2 (hpmk ht2) h⟩
theorem isPiSystem_iUnion_of_monotone {α ι} [SemilatticeSup ι] (p : ι → Set (Set α))
(hp_pi : ∀ n, IsPiSystem (p n)) (hp_mono : Monotone p) : IsPiSystem (⋃ n, p n) :=
isPiSystem_iUnion_of_directed_le p hp_pi (Monotone.directed_le hp_mono)
/-- Rectangles formed by π-systems form a π-system. -/
lemma IsPiSystem.prod {C : Set (Set α)} {D : Set (Set β)} (hC : IsPiSystem C) (hD : IsPiSystem D) :
IsPiSystem (image2 (· ×ˢ ·) C D) := by
rintro _ ⟨s₁, hs₁, t₁, ht₁, rfl⟩ _ ⟨s₂, hs₂, t₂, ht₂, rfl⟩ hst
rw [prod_inter_prod] at hst ⊢; rw [prod_nonempty_iff] at hst
exact mem_image2_of_mem (hC _ hs₁ _ hs₂ hst.1) (hD _ ht₁ _ ht₂ hst.2)
section Order
variable {ι ι' : Sort*} [LinearOrder α]
theorem isPiSystem_image_Iio (s : Set α) : IsPiSystem (Iio '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ _ ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩ -
exact ⟨a ⊓ b, inf_ind a b ha hb, Iio_inter_Iio.symm⟩
theorem isPiSystem_Iio : IsPiSystem (range Iio : Set (Set α)) :=
@image_univ α _ Iio ▸ isPiSystem_image_Iio univ
theorem isPiSystem_image_Ioi (s : Set α) : IsPiSystem (Ioi '' s) :=
@isPiSystem_image_Iio αᵒᵈ _ s
theorem isPiSystem_Ioi : IsPiSystem (range Ioi : Set (Set α)) :=
@image_univ α _ Ioi ▸ isPiSystem_image_Ioi univ
theorem isPiSystem_image_Iic (s : Set α) : IsPiSystem (Iic '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ _ ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩ -
exact ⟨a ⊓ b, inf_ind a b ha hb, Iic_inter_Iic.symm⟩
theorem isPiSystem_Iic : IsPiSystem (range Iic : Set (Set α)) :=
@image_univ α _ Iic ▸ isPiSystem_image_Iic univ
theorem isPiSystem_image_Ici (s : Set α) : IsPiSystem (Ici '' s) :=
@isPiSystem_image_Iic αᵒᵈ _ s
theorem isPiSystem_Ici : IsPiSystem (range Ici : Set (Set α)) :=
@image_univ α _ Ici ▸ isPiSystem_image_Ici univ
theorem isPiSystem_Ixx_mem {Ixx : α → α → Set α} {p : α → α → Prop}
(Hne : ∀ {a b}, (Ixx a b).Nonempty → p a b)
(Hi : ∀ {a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂}, Ixx a₁ b₁ ∩ Ixx a₂ b₂ = Ixx (max a₁ a₂) (min b₁ b₂)) (s t : Set α) :
IsPiSystem { S | ∃ᵉ (l ∈ s) (u ∈ t), p l u ∧ Ixx l u = S } := by
rintro _ ⟨l₁, hls₁, u₁, hut₁, _, rfl⟩ _ ⟨l₂, hls₂, u₂, hut₂, _, rfl⟩
simp only [Hi]
exact fun H => ⟨l₁ ⊔ l₂, sup_ind l₁ l₂ hls₁ hls₂, u₁ ⊓ u₂, inf_ind u₁ u₂ hut₁ hut₂, Hne H, rfl⟩
theorem isPiSystem_Ixx {Ixx : α → α → Set α} {p : α → α → Prop}
(Hne : ∀ {a b}, (Ixx a b).Nonempty → p a b)
(Hi : ∀ {a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂}, Ixx a₁ b₁ ∩ Ixx a₂ b₂ = Ixx (max a₁ a₂) (min b₁ b₂)) (f : ι → α)
(g : ι' → α) : @IsPiSystem α { S | ∃ i j, p (f i) (g j) ∧ Ixx (f i) (g j) = S } := by
simpa only [exists_range_iff] using isPiSystem_Ixx_mem (@Hne) (@Hi) (range f) (range g)
theorem isPiSystem_Ioo_mem (s t : Set α) :
IsPiSystem { S | ∃ᵉ (l ∈ s) (u ∈ t), l < u ∧ Ioo l u = S } :=
isPiSystem_Ixx_mem (Ixx := Ioo) (fun ⟨_, hax, hxb⟩ => hax.trans hxb) Ioo_inter_Ioo s t
theorem isPiSystem_Ioo (f : ι → α) (g : ι' → α) :
@IsPiSystem α { S | ∃ l u, f l < g u ∧ Ioo (f l) (g u) = S } :=
isPiSystem_Ixx (Ixx := Ioo) (fun ⟨_, hax, hxb⟩ => hax.trans hxb) Ioo_inter_Ioo f g
theorem isPiSystem_Ioc_mem (s t : Set α) :
IsPiSystem { S | ∃ᵉ (l ∈ s) (u ∈ t), l < u ∧ Ioc l u = S } :=
isPiSystem_Ixx_mem (Ixx := Ioc) (fun ⟨_, hax, hxb⟩ => hax.trans_le hxb) Ioc_inter_Ioc s t
theorem isPiSystem_Ioc (f : ι → α) (g : ι' → α) :
@IsPiSystem α { S | ∃ i j, f i < g j ∧ Ioc (f i) (g j) = S } :=
isPiSystem_Ixx (Ixx := Ioc) (fun ⟨_, hax, hxb⟩ => hax.trans_le hxb) Ioc_inter_Ioc f g
theorem isPiSystem_Ico_mem (s t : Set α) :
IsPiSystem { S | ∃ᵉ (l ∈ s) (u ∈ t), l < u ∧ Ico l u = S } :=
isPiSystem_Ixx_mem (Ixx := Ico) (fun ⟨_, hax, hxb⟩ => hax.trans_lt hxb) Ico_inter_Ico s t
theorem isPiSystem_Ico (f : ι → α) (g : ι' → α) :
@IsPiSystem α { S | ∃ i j, f i < g j ∧ Ico (f i) (g j) = S } :=
isPiSystem_Ixx (Ixx := Ico) (fun ⟨_, hax, hxb⟩ => hax.trans_lt hxb) Ico_inter_Ico f g
theorem isPiSystem_Icc_mem (s t : Set α) :
IsPiSystem { S | ∃ᵉ (l ∈ s) (u ∈ t), l ≤ u ∧ Icc l u = S } :=
isPiSystem_Ixx_mem (Ixx := Icc) nonempty_Icc.1 (by exact Icc_inter_Icc) s t
theorem isPiSystem_Icc (f : ι → α) (g : ι' → α) :
@IsPiSystem α { S | ∃ i j, f i ≤ g j ∧ Icc (f i) (g j) = S } :=
isPiSystem_Ixx (Ixx := Icc) nonempty_Icc.1 (by exact Icc_inter_Icc) f g
end Order
/-- Given a collection `S` of subsets of `α`, then `generatePiSystem S` is the smallest
π-system containing `S`. -/
inductive generatePiSystem (S : Set (Set α)) : Set (Set α)
| base {s : Set α} (h_s : s ∈ S) : generatePiSystem S s
| inter {s t : Set α} (h_s : generatePiSystem S s) (h_t : generatePiSystem S t)
(h_nonempty : (s ∩ t).Nonempty) : generatePiSystem S (s ∩ t)
theorem isPiSystem_generatePiSystem (S : Set (Set α)) : IsPiSystem (generatePiSystem S) :=
fun _ h_s _ h_t h_nonempty => generatePiSystem.inter h_s h_t h_nonempty
theorem subset_generatePiSystem_self (S : Set (Set α)) : S ⊆ generatePiSystem S := fun _ =>
generatePiSystem.base
theorem generatePiSystem_subset_self {S : Set (Set α)} (h_S : IsPiSystem S) :
generatePiSystem S ⊆ S := fun x h => by
induction h with
| base h_s => exact h_s
| inter _ _ h_nonempty h_s h_u => exact h_S _ h_s _ h_u h_nonempty
theorem generatePiSystem_eq {S : Set (Set α)} (h_pi : IsPiSystem S) : generatePiSystem S = S :=
Set.Subset.antisymm (generatePiSystem_subset_self h_pi) (subset_generatePiSystem_self S)
theorem generatePiSystem_mono {S T : Set (Set α)} (hST : S ⊆ T) :
generatePiSystem S ⊆ generatePiSystem T := fun t ht => by
induction ht with
| base h_s => exact generatePiSystem.base (Set.mem_of_subset_of_mem hST h_s)
| inter _ _ h_nonempty h_s h_u => exact isPiSystem_generatePiSystem T _ h_s _ h_u h_nonempty
theorem generatePiSystem_measurableSet [M : MeasurableSpace α] {S : Set (Set α)}
(h_meas_S : ∀ s ∈ S, MeasurableSet s) (t : Set α) (h_in_pi : t ∈ generatePiSystem S) :
MeasurableSet t := by
induction h_in_pi with
| base h_s => apply h_meas_S _ h_s
| inter _ _ _ h_s h_u => apply MeasurableSet.inter h_s h_u
theorem generateFrom_measurableSet_of_generatePiSystem {g : Set (Set α)} (t : Set α)
(ht : t ∈ generatePiSystem g) : MeasurableSet[generateFrom g] t :=
@generatePiSystem_measurableSet α (generateFrom g) g
(fun _ h_s_in_g => measurableSet_generateFrom h_s_in_g) t ht
theorem generateFrom_generatePiSystem_eq {g : Set (Set α)} :
generateFrom (generatePiSystem g) = generateFrom g := by
apply le_antisymm <;> apply generateFrom_le
· exact fun t h_t => generateFrom_measurableSet_of_generatePiSystem t h_t
· exact fun t h_t => measurableSet_generateFrom (generatePiSystem.base h_t)
/-- Every element of the π-system generated by the union of a family of π-systems
is a finite intersection of elements from the π-systems.
For an indexed union version, see `mem_generatePiSystem_iUnion_elim'`. -/
theorem mem_generatePiSystem_iUnion_elim {α β} {g : β → Set (Set α)} (h_pi : ∀ b, IsPiSystem (g b))
(t : Set α) (h_t : t ∈ generatePiSystem (⋃ b, g b)) :
∃ (T : Finset β) (f : β → Set α), (t = ⋂ b ∈ T, f b) ∧ ∀ b ∈ T, f b ∈ g b := by
classical
induction h_t with
| @base s h_s =>
rcases h_s with ⟨t', ⟨⟨b, rfl⟩, h_s_in_t'⟩⟩
refine ⟨{b}, fun _ => s, ?_⟩
simpa using h_s_in_t'
| inter h_gen_s h_gen_t' h_nonempty h_s h_t' =>
rcases h_t' with ⟨T_t', ⟨f_t', ⟨rfl, h_t'⟩⟩⟩
rcases h_s with ⟨T_s, ⟨f_s, ⟨rfl, h_s⟩⟩⟩
use T_s ∪ T_t', fun b : β =>
if b ∈ T_s then if b ∈ T_t' then f_s b ∩ f_t' b else f_s b
else if b ∈ T_t' then f_t' b else (∅ : Set α)
constructor
· ext a
simp_rw [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_iInter, Finset.mem_union, or_imp]
rw [← forall_and]
constructor <;> intro h1 b <;> by_cases hbs : b ∈ T_s <;> by_cases hbt : b ∈ T_t' <;>
specialize h1 b <;>
simp only [hbs, hbt, if_true, if_false, true_imp_iff, and_self_iff, false_imp_iff] at h1 ⊢
all_goals exact h1
intro b h_b
split_ifs with hbs hbt hbt
· refine h_pi b (f_s b) (h_s b hbs) (f_t' b) (h_t' b hbt) (Set.Nonempty.mono ?_ h_nonempty)
exact Set.inter_subset_inter (Set.biInter_subset_of_mem hbs) (Set.biInter_subset_of_mem hbt)
· exact h_s b hbs
· exact h_t' b hbt
· rw [Finset.mem_union] at h_b
apply False.elim (h_b.elim hbs hbt)
/-- Every element of the π-system generated by an indexed union of a family of π-systems
is a finite intersection of elements from the π-systems.
For a total union version, see `mem_generatePiSystem_iUnion_elim`. -/
theorem mem_generatePiSystem_iUnion_elim' {α β} {g : β → Set (Set α)} {s : Set β}
(h_pi : ∀ b ∈ s, IsPiSystem (g b)) (t : Set α) (h_t : t ∈ generatePiSystem (⋃ b ∈ s, g b)) :
∃ (T : Finset β) (f : β → Set α), ↑T ⊆ s ∧ (t = ⋂ b ∈ T, f b) ∧ ∀ b ∈ T, f b ∈ g b := by
classical
have : t ∈ generatePiSystem (⋃ b : Subtype s, (g ∘ Subtype.val) b) := by
suffices h1 : ⋃ b : Subtype s, (g ∘ Subtype.val) b = ⋃ b ∈ s, g b by rwa [h1]
ext x
simp only [exists_prop, Set.mem_iUnion, Function.comp_apply, Subtype.exists, Subtype.coe_mk]
rfl
rcases @mem_generatePiSystem_iUnion_elim α (Subtype s) (g ∘ Subtype.val)
(fun b => h_pi b.val b.property) t this with
⟨T, ⟨f, ⟨rfl, h_t'⟩⟩⟩
refine
⟨T.image (fun x : s => (x : β)),
Function.extend (fun x : s => (x : β)) f fun _ : β => (∅ : Set α), by simp, ?_, ?_⟩
· ext a
constructor <;>
· simp -proj only
[Set.mem_iInter, Subtype.forall, Finset.set_biInter_finset_image]
intro h1 b h_b h_b_in_T
have h2 := h1 b h_b h_b_in_T
revert h2
rw [Subtype.val_injective.extend_apply]
apply id
· intros b h_b
simp_rw [Finset.mem_image, Subtype.exists, exists_and_right, exists_eq_right]
at h_b
obtain ⟨h_b_w, h_b_h⟩ := h_b
have h_b_alt : b = (Subtype.mk b h_b_w).val := rfl
rw [h_b_alt, Subtype.val_injective.extend_apply]
apply h_t'
apply h_b_h
section UnionInter
variable {α ι : Type*}
/-! ### π-system generated by finite intersections of sets of a π-system family -/
/-- From a set of indices `S : Set ι` and a family of sets of sets `π : ι → Set (Set α)`,
define the set of sets that can be written as `⋂ x ∈ t, f x` for some finset `t ⊆ S` and sets
`f x ∈ π x`. If `π` is a family of π-systems, then it is a π-system. -/
def piiUnionInter (π : ι → Set (Set α)) (S : Set ι) : Set (Set α) :=
{ s : Set α |
∃ (t : Finset ι) (_ : ↑t ⊆ S) (f : ι → Set α) (_ : ∀ x, x ∈ t → f x ∈ π x), s = ⋂ x ∈ t, f x }
theorem piiUnionInter_singleton (π : ι → Set (Set α)) (i : ι) :
piiUnionInter π {i} = π i ∪ {univ} := by
ext1 s
simp only [piiUnionInter, exists_prop, mem_union]
refine ⟨?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨t, hti, f, hfπ, rfl⟩
simp only [subset_singleton_iff, Finset.mem_coe] at hti
by_cases hi : i ∈ t
· have ht_eq_i : t = {i} := by
ext1 x
rw [Finset.mem_singleton]
exact ⟨fun h => hti x h, fun h => h.symm ▸ hi⟩
simp only [ht_eq_i, Finset.mem_singleton, iInter_iInter_eq_left]
exact Or.inl (hfπ i hi)
· have ht_empty : t = ∅ := by
ext1 x
simp only [Finset.not_mem_empty, iff_false]
exact fun hx => hi (hti x hx ▸ hx)
simp [ht_empty, iInter_false, iInter_univ, Set.mem_singleton univ]
· rcases h with hs | hs
· refine ⟨{i}, ?_, fun _ => s, ⟨fun x hx => ?_, ?_⟩⟩
· rw [Finset.coe_singleton]
· rw [Finset.mem_singleton] at hx
rwa [hx]
· simp only [Finset.mem_singleton, iInter_iInter_eq_left]
· refine ⟨∅, ?_⟩
simpa only [Finset.coe_empty, subset_singleton_iff, mem_empty_iff_false, IsEmpty.forall_iff,
imp_true_iff, Finset.not_mem_empty, iInter_false, iInter_univ, true_and,
exists_const] using hs
theorem piiUnionInter_singleton_left (s : ι → Set α) (S : Set ι) :
piiUnionInter (fun i => ({s i} : Set (Set α))) S =
{ s' : Set α | ∃ (t : Finset ι) (_ : ↑t ⊆ S), s' = ⋂ i ∈ t, s i } := by
ext1 s'
simp_rw [piiUnionInter, Set.mem_singleton_iff, exists_prop, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨t, htS, h_eq⟩ => ⟨t, htS, s, fun _ _ => rfl, h_eq⟩⟩
obtain ⟨t, htS, f, hft_eq, rfl⟩ := h
refine ⟨t, htS, ?_⟩
congr! 3
apply hft_eq
assumption
theorem generateFrom_piiUnionInter_singleton_left (s : ι → Set α) (S : Set ι) :
generateFrom (piiUnionInter (fun k => {s k}) S) = generateFrom { t | ∃ k ∈ S, s k = t } := by
refine le_antisymm (generateFrom_le ?_) (generateFrom_mono ?_)
· rintro _ ⟨I, hI, f, hf, rfl⟩
refine Finset.measurableSet_biInter _ fun m hm => measurableSet_generateFrom ?_
exact ⟨m, hI hm, (hf m hm).symm⟩
· rintro _ ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩
refine ⟨{k}, fun m hm => ?_, s, fun i _ => ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [Finset.mem_coe, Finset.mem_singleton] at hm
rwa [hm]
· exact Set.mem_singleton _
· simp only [Finset.mem_singleton, Set.iInter_iInter_eq_left]
/-- If `π` is a family of π-systems, then `piiUnionInter π S` is a π-system. -/
theorem isPiSystem_piiUnionInter (π : ι → Set (Set α)) (hpi : ∀ x, IsPiSystem (π x)) (S : Set ι) :
IsPiSystem (piiUnionInter π S) := by
classical
rintro t1 ⟨p1, hp1S, f1, hf1m, ht1_eq⟩ t2 ⟨p2, hp2S, f2, hf2m, ht2_eq⟩ h_nonempty
simp_rw [piiUnionInter, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
let g n := ite (n ∈ p1) (f1 n) Set.univ ∩ ite (n ∈ p2) (f2 n) Set.univ
have hp_union_ss : ↑(p1 ∪ p2) ⊆ S := by
simp only [hp1S, hp2S, Finset.coe_union, union_subset_iff, and_self_iff]
use p1 ∪ p2, hp_union_ss, g
have h_inter_eq : t1 ∩ t2 = ⋂ i ∈ p1 ∪ p2, g i := by
rw [ht1_eq, ht2_eq]
simp_rw [← Set.inf_eq_inter]
ext1 x
simp only [g, inf_eq_inter, mem_inter_iff, mem_iInter, Finset.mem_union]
refine ⟨fun h i _ => ?_, fun h => ⟨fun i hi1 => ?_, fun i hi2 => ?_⟩⟩
· split_ifs with h_1 h_2 h_2
exacts [⟨h.1 i h_1, h.2 i h_2⟩, ⟨h.1 i h_1, Set.mem_univ _⟩, ⟨Set.mem_univ _, h.2 i h_2⟩,
⟨Set.mem_univ _, Set.mem_univ _⟩]
· specialize h i (Or.inl hi1)
rw [if_pos hi1] at h
exact h.1
· specialize h i (Or.inr hi2)
rw [if_pos hi2] at h
exact h.2
refine ⟨fun n hn => ?_, h_inter_eq⟩
simp only [g]
split_ifs with hn1 hn2 h
· refine hpi n (f1 n) (hf1m n hn1) (f2 n) (hf2m n hn2) (Set.nonempty_iff_ne_empty.2 fun h => ?_)
rw [h_inter_eq] at h_nonempty
suffices h_empty : ⋂ i ∈ p1 ∪ p2, g i = ∅ from
(Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.mpr h_empty) h_nonempty
refine le_antisymm (Set.iInter_subset_of_subset n ?_) (Set.empty_subset _)
refine Set.iInter_subset_of_subset hn ?_
simp_rw [g, if_pos hn1, if_pos hn2]
exact h.subset
· simp [hf1m n hn1]
· simp [hf2m n h]
· exact absurd hn (by simp [hn1, h])
theorem piiUnionInter_mono_left {π π' : ι → Set (Set α)} (h_le : ∀ i, π i ⊆ π' i) (S : Set ι) :
piiUnionInter π S ⊆ piiUnionInter π' S := fun _ ⟨t, ht_mem, ft, hft_mem_pi, h_eq⟩ =>
⟨t, ht_mem, ft, fun x hxt => h_le x (hft_mem_pi x hxt), h_eq⟩
theorem piiUnionInter_mono_right {π : ι → Set (Set α)} {S T : Set ι} (hST : S ⊆ T) :
piiUnionInter π S ⊆ piiUnionInter π T := fun _ ⟨t, ht_mem, ft, hft_mem_pi, h_eq⟩ =>
⟨t, ht_mem.trans hST, ft, hft_mem_pi, h_eq⟩
theorem generateFrom_piiUnionInter_le {m : MeasurableSpace α} (π : ι → Set (Set α))
(h : ∀ n, generateFrom (π n) ≤ m) (S : Set ι) : generateFrom (piiUnionInter π S) ≤ m := by
refine generateFrom_le ?_
rintro t ⟨ht_p, _, ft, hft_mem_pi, rfl⟩
refine Finset.measurableSet_biInter _ fun x hx_mem => (h x) _ ?_
exact measurableSet_generateFrom (hft_mem_pi x hx_mem)
theorem subset_piiUnionInter {π : ι → Set (Set α)} {S : Set ι} {i : ι} (his : i ∈ S) :
π i ⊆ piiUnionInter π S := by
have h_ss : {i} ⊆ S := by
intro j hj
rw [mem_singleton_iff] at hj
rwa [hj]
refine Subset.trans ?_ (piiUnionInter_mono_right h_ss)
rw [piiUnionInter_singleton]
exact subset_union_left
theorem mem_piiUnionInter_of_measurableSet (m : ι → MeasurableSpace α) {S : Set ι} {i : ι}
(hiS : i ∈ S) (s : Set α) (hs : MeasurableSet[m i] s) :
s ∈ piiUnionInter (fun n => { s | MeasurableSet[m n] s }) S :=
subset_piiUnionInter hiS hs
theorem le_generateFrom_piiUnionInter {π : ι → Set (Set α)} (S : Set ι) {x : ι} (hxS : x ∈ S) :
generateFrom (π x) ≤ generateFrom (piiUnionInter π S) :=
generateFrom_mono (subset_piiUnionInter hxS)
theorem measurableSet_iSup_of_mem_piiUnionInter (m : ι → MeasurableSpace α) (S : Set ι) (t : Set α)
(ht : t ∈ piiUnionInter (fun n => { s | MeasurableSet[m n] s }) S) :
MeasurableSet[⨆ i ∈ S, m i] t := by
rcases ht with ⟨pt, hpt, ft, ht_m, rfl⟩
refine pt.measurableSet_biInter fun i hi => ?_
suffices h_le : m i ≤ ⨆ i ∈ S, m i from h_le (ft i) (ht_m i hi)
have hi' : i ∈ S := hpt hi
exact le_iSup₂ (f := fun i (_ : i ∈ S) => m i) i hi'
theorem generateFrom_piiUnionInter_measurableSet (m : ι → MeasurableSpace α) (S : Set ι) :
generateFrom (piiUnionInter (fun n => { s | MeasurableSet[m n] s }) S) = ⨆ i ∈ S, m i := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· rw [← @generateFrom_measurableSet α (⨆ i ∈ S, m i)]
exact generateFrom_mono (measurableSet_iSup_of_mem_piiUnionInter m S)
· refine iSup₂_le fun i hi => ?_
rw [← @generateFrom_measurableSet α (m i)]
exact generateFrom_mono (mem_piiUnionInter_of_measurableSet m hi)
end UnionInter
namespace MeasurableSpace
open scoped Function -- required for scoped `on` notation
variable {α : Type*}
/-! ## Dynkin systems and Π-λ theorem -/
/-- A Dynkin system is a collection of subsets of a type `α` that contains the empty set,
is closed under complementation and under countable union of pairwise disjoint sets.
The disjointness condition is the only difference with `σ`-algebras.
The main purpose of Dynkin systems is to provide a powerful induction rule for σ-algebras
generated by a collection of sets which is stable under intersection.
A Dynkin system is also known as a "λ-system" or a "d-system".
-/
structure DynkinSystem (α : Type*) where
/-- Predicate saying that a given set is contained in the Dynkin system. -/
Has : Set α → Prop
/-- A Dynkin system contains the empty set. -/
has_empty : Has ∅
/-- A Dynkin system is closed under complementation. -/
has_compl : ∀ {a}, Has a → Has aᶜ
/-- A Dynkin system is closed under countable union of pairwise disjoint sets. Use a more general
`MeasurableSpace.DynkinSystem.has_iUnion` instead. -/
| has_iUnion_nat : ∀ {f : ℕ → Set α}, Pairwise (Disjoint on f) → (∀ i, Has (f i)) → Has (⋃ i, f i)
namespace DynkinSystem
@[ext]
theorem ext : ∀ {d₁ d₂ : DynkinSystem α}, (∀ s : Set α, d₁.Has s ↔ d₂.Has s) → d₁ = d₂
| ⟨s₁, _, _, _⟩, ⟨s₂, _, _, _⟩, h => by
have : s₁ = s₂ := funext fun x => propext <| h x
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/PiSystem.lean | 512 | 519 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alex Kontorovich, David Loeffler, Heather Macbeth, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ParametricIntegral
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.CPolynomial
import Mathlib.Analysis.Fourier.AddCircle
import Mathlib.Analysis.Fourier.FourierTransform
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Analytic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.LineDeriv.IntegrationByParts
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Bounds
/-!
# Derivatives of the Fourier transform
In this file we compute the Fréchet derivative of the Fourier transform of `f`, where `f` is a
function such that both `f` and `v ↦ ‖v‖ * ‖f v‖` are integrable. Here the Fourier transform is
understood as an operator `(V → E) → (W → E)`, where `V` and `W` are normed `ℝ`-vector spaces
and the Fourier transform is taken with respect to a continuous `ℝ`-bilinear
pairing `L : V × W → ℝ` and a given reference measure `μ`.
We also investigate higher derivatives: Assuming that `‖v‖^n * ‖f v‖` is integrable, we show
that the Fourier transform of `f` is `C^n`.
We also study in a parallel way the Fourier transform of the derivative, which is obtained by
tensoring the Fourier transform of the original function with the bilinear form. We also get
results for iterated derivatives.
A consequence of these results is that, if a function is smooth and all its derivatives are
integrable when multiplied by `‖v‖^k`, then the same goes for its Fourier transform, with
explicit bounds.
We give specialized versions of these results on inner product spaces (where `L` is the scalar
product) and on the real line, where we express the one-dimensional derivative in more concrete
terms, as the Fourier transform of `-2πI x * f x` (or `(-2πI x)^n * f x` for higher derivatives).
## Main definitions and results
We introduce two convenience definitions:
* `VectorFourier.fourierSMulRight L f`: given `f : V → E` and `L` a bilinear pairing
between `V` and `W`, then this is the function `fun v ↦ -(2 * π * I) (L v ⬝) • f v`,
from `V` to `Hom (W, E)`.
This is essentially `ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight`, up to the factor `- 2πI` designed to make
sure that the Fourier integral of `fourierSMulRight L f` is the derivative of the Fourier
integral of `f`.
* `VectorFourier.fourierPowSMulRight` is the higher order analogue for higher derivatives:
`fourierPowSMulRight L f v n` is informally `(-(2 * π * I))^n (L v ⬝)^n • f v`, in
the space of continuous multilinear maps `W [×n]→L[ℝ] E`.
With these definitions, the statements read as follows, first in a general context
(arbitrary `L` and `μ`):
* `VectorFourier.hasFDerivAt_fourierIntegral`: the Fourier integral of `f` is differentiable, with
derivative the Fourier integral of `fourierSMulRight L f`.
* `VectorFourier.differentiable_fourierIntegral`: the Fourier integral of `f` is differentiable.
* `VectorFourier.fderiv_fourierIntegral`: formula for the derivative of the Fourier integral of `f`.
* `VectorFourier.fourierIntegral_fderiv`: formula for the Fourier integral of the derivative of `f`.
* `VectorFourier.hasFTaylorSeriesUpTo_fourierIntegral`: under suitable integrability conditions,
the Fourier integral of `f` has an explicit Taylor series up to order `N`, given by the Fourier
integrals of `fun v ↦ fourierPowSMulRight L f v n`.
* `VectorFourier.contDiff_fourierIntegral`: under suitable integrability conditions,
the Fourier integral of `f` is `C^n`.
* `VectorFourier.iteratedFDeriv_fourierIntegral`: under suitable integrability conditions,
explicit formula for the `n`-th derivative of the Fourier integral of `f`, as the Fourier
integral of `fun v ↦ fourierPowSMulRight L f v n`.
* `VectorFourier.pow_mul_norm_iteratedFDeriv_fourierIntegral_le`: explicit bounds for the `n`-th
derivative of the Fourier integral, multiplied by a power function, in terms of corresponding
integrals for the original function.
These statements are then specialized to the case of the usual Fourier transform on
finite-dimensional inner product spaces with their canonical Lebesgue measure (covering in
particular the case of the real line), replacing the namespace `VectorFourier` by
the namespace `Real` in the above statements.
We also give specialized versions of the one-dimensional real derivative (and iterated derivative)
in `Real.deriv_fourierIntegral` and `Real.iteratedDeriv_fourierIntegral`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Real Complex MeasureTheory Filter TopologicalSpace
open scoped FourierTransform Topology ContDiff
-- without this local instance, Lean tries first the instance
-- `secondCountableTopologyEither_of_right` (whose priority is 100) and takes a very long time to
-- fail. Since we only use the left instance in this file, we make sure it is tried first.
attribute [local instance 101] secondCountableTopologyEither_of_left
namespace Real
lemma hasDerivAt_fourierChar (x : ℝ) : HasDerivAt (𝐞 · : ℝ → ℂ) (2 * π * I * 𝐞 x) x := by
have h1 (y : ℝ) : 𝐞 y = fourier 1 (y : UnitAddCircle) := by
rw [fourierChar_apply, fourier_coe_apply]
push_cast
ring_nf
simpa only [h1, Int.cast_one, ofReal_one, div_one, mul_one] using hasDerivAt_fourier 1 1 x
lemma differentiable_fourierChar : Differentiable ℝ (𝐞 · : ℝ → ℂ) :=
fun x ↦ (Real.hasDerivAt_fourierChar x).differentiableAt
lemma deriv_fourierChar (x : ℝ) : deriv (𝐞 · : ℝ → ℂ) x = 2 * π * I * 𝐞 x :=
(Real.hasDerivAt_fourierChar x).deriv
variable {V W : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedSpace ℝ V]
[NormedAddCommGroup W] [NormedSpace ℝ W] (L : V →L[ℝ] W →L[ℝ] ℝ)
lemma hasFDerivAt_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_right (v : V) (w : W) :
HasFDerivAt (fun w ↦ (𝐞 (-L v w) : ℂ))
((-2 * π * I * 𝐞 (-L v w)) • (ofRealCLM ∘L (L v))) w := by
have ha : HasFDerivAt (fun w' : W ↦ L v w') (L v) w := ContinuousLinearMap.hasFDerivAt (L v)
convert (hasDerivAt_fourierChar (-L v w)).hasFDerivAt.comp w ha.neg using 1
ext y
simp only [neg_mul, ContinuousLinearMap.coe_smul', ContinuousLinearMap.coe_comp', Pi.smul_apply,
Function.comp_apply, ofRealCLM_apply, smul_eq_mul, ContinuousLinearMap.comp_neg,
ContinuousLinearMap.neg_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.one_apply, real_smul, neg_inj]
ring
lemma fderiv_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_right_apply (v : V) (w y : W) :
fderiv ℝ (fun w ↦ (𝐞 (-L v w) : ℂ)) w y = -2 * π * I * L v y * 𝐞 (-L v w) := by
simp only [(hasFDerivAt_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_right L v w).fderiv, neg_mul,
ContinuousLinearMap.coe_smul', ContinuousLinearMap.coe_comp', Pi.smul_apply,
Function.comp_apply, ofRealCLM_apply, smul_eq_mul, neg_inj]
ring
lemma differentiable_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_right (v : V) :
Differentiable ℝ (fun w ↦ (𝐞 (-L v w) : ℂ)) :=
fun w ↦ (hasFDerivAt_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_right L v w).differentiableAt
lemma hasFDerivAt_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_left (v : V) (w : W) :
HasFDerivAt (fun v ↦ (𝐞 (-L v w) : ℂ))
((-2 * π * I * 𝐞 (-L v w)) • (ofRealCLM ∘L (L.flip w))) v :=
hasFDerivAt_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_right L.flip w v
lemma fderiv_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_left_apply (v y : V) (w : W) :
fderiv ℝ (fun v ↦ (𝐞 (-L v w) : ℂ)) v y = -2 * π * I * L y w * 𝐞 (-L v w) := by
simp only [(hasFDerivAt_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_left L v w).fderiv, neg_mul,
ContinuousLinearMap.coe_smul', ContinuousLinearMap.coe_comp', Pi.smul_apply,
Function.comp_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.flip_apply, ofRealCLM_apply, smul_eq_mul, neg_inj]
ring
lemma differentiable_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_left (w : W) :
Differentiable ℝ (fun v ↦ (𝐞 (-L v w) : ℂ)) :=
fun v ↦ (hasFDerivAt_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_left L v w).differentiableAt
end Real
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E]
namespace VectorFourier
variable {V W : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedSpace ℝ V]
[NormedAddCommGroup W] [NormedSpace ℝ W] (L : V →L[ℝ] W →L[ℝ] ℝ) (f : V → E)
/-- Send a function `f : V → E` to the function `f : V → Hom (W, E)` given by
`v ↦ (w ↦ -2 * π * I * L (v, w) • f v)`. This is designed so that the Fourier transform of
`fourierSMulRight L f` is the derivative of the Fourier transform of `f`. -/
def fourierSMulRight (v : V) : (W →L[ℝ] E) := -(2 * π * I) • (L v).smulRight (f v)
@[simp] lemma fourierSMulRight_apply (v : V) (w : W) :
fourierSMulRight L f v w = -(2 * π * I) • L v w • f v := rfl
/-- The `w`-derivative of the Fourier transform integrand. -/
lemma hasFDerivAt_fourierChar_smul (v : V) (w : W) :
HasFDerivAt (fun w' ↦ 𝐞 (-L v w') • f v) (𝐞 (-L v w) • fourierSMulRight L f v) w := by
have ha : HasFDerivAt (fun w' : W ↦ L v w') (L v) w := ContinuousLinearMap.hasFDerivAt (L v)
convert ((hasDerivAt_fourierChar (-L v w)).hasFDerivAt.comp w ha.neg).smul_const (f v)
ext w' : 1
simp_rw [fourierSMulRight, ContinuousLinearMap.smul_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight_apply]
rw [ContinuousLinearMap.comp_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.neg_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.one_apply, ← smul_assoc, smul_comm,
← smul_assoc, real_smul, real_smul, Submonoid.smul_def, smul_eq_mul]
push_cast
ring_nf
lemma norm_fourierSMulRight (L : V →L[ℝ] W →L[ℝ] ℝ) (f : V → E) (v : V) :
‖fourierSMulRight L f v‖ = (2 * π) * ‖L v‖ * ‖f v‖ := by
rw [fourierSMulRight, norm_smul _ (ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight (L v) (f v)),
norm_neg, norm_mul, norm_mul, norm_I, mul_one, Complex.norm_of_nonneg pi_pos.le,
Complex.norm_two, ContinuousLinearMap.norm_smulRight_apply, ← mul_assoc]
lemma norm_fourierSMulRight_le (L : V →L[ℝ] W →L[ℝ] ℝ) (f : V → E) (v : V) :
‖fourierSMulRight L f v‖ ≤ 2 * π * ‖L‖ * ‖v‖ * ‖f v‖ := calc
‖fourierSMulRight L f v‖ = (2 * π) * ‖L v‖ * ‖f v‖ := norm_fourierSMulRight _ _ _
_ ≤ (2 * π) * (‖L‖ * ‖v‖) * ‖f v‖ := by gcongr; exact L.le_opNorm _
_ = 2 * π * ‖L‖ * ‖v‖ * ‖f v‖ := by ring
lemma _root_.MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.fourierSMulRight
[SecondCountableTopologyEither V (W →L[ℝ] ℝ)] [MeasurableSpace V] [BorelSpace V]
{L : V →L[ℝ] W →L[ℝ] ℝ} {f : V → E} {μ : Measure V}
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun v ↦ fourierSMulRight L f v) μ := by
apply AEStronglyMeasurable.const_smul'
have aux0 : Continuous fun p : (W →L[ℝ] ℝ) × E ↦ p.1.smulRight p.2 :=
(ContinuousLinearMap.smulRightL ℝ W E).continuous₂
have aux1 : AEStronglyMeasurable (fun v ↦ (L v, f v)) μ :=
L.continuous.aestronglyMeasurable.prodMk hf
-- Elaboration without the expected type is faster here:
exact (aux0.comp_aestronglyMeasurable aux1 :)
variable {f}
/-- Main theorem of this section: if both `f` and `x ↦ ‖x‖ * ‖f x‖` are integrable, then the
Fourier transform of `f` has a Fréchet derivative (everywhere in its domain) and its derivative is
the Fourier transform of `smulRight L f`. -/
theorem hasFDerivAt_fourierIntegral
[MeasurableSpace V] [BorelSpace V] [SecondCountableTopology V] {μ : Measure V}
(hf : Integrable f μ) (hf' : Integrable (fun v : V ↦ ‖v‖ * ‖f v‖) μ) (w : W) :
HasFDerivAt (fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ f)
(fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ (fourierSMulRight L f) w) w := by
let F : W → V → E := fun w' v ↦ 𝐞 (-L v w') • f v
let F' : W → V → W →L[ℝ] E := fun w' v ↦ 𝐞 (-L v w') • fourierSMulRight L f v
let B : V → ℝ := fun v ↦ 2 * π * ‖L‖ * ‖v‖ * ‖f v‖
have h0 (w' : W) : Integrable (F w') μ :=
(fourierIntegral_convergent_iff continuous_fourierChar
(by apply L.continuous₂ : Continuous (fun p : V × W ↦ L.toLinearMap₂ p.1 p.2)) w').2 hf
have h1 : ∀ᶠ w' in 𝓝 w, AEStronglyMeasurable (F w') μ :=
Eventually.of_forall (fun w' ↦ (h0 w').aestronglyMeasurable)
have h3 : AEStronglyMeasurable (F' w) μ := by
refine .smul ?_ hf.1.fourierSMulRight
refine (continuous_fourierChar.comp ?_).aestronglyMeasurable
fun_prop
have h4 : (∀ᵐ v ∂μ, ∀ (w' : W), w' ∈ Metric.ball w 1 → ‖F' w' v‖ ≤ B v) := by
filter_upwards with v w' _
rw [Circle.norm_smul _ (fourierSMulRight L f v)]
exact norm_fourierSMulRight_le L f v
have h5 : Integrable B μ := by simpa only [← mul_assoc] using hf'.const_mul (2 * π * ‖L‖)
have h6 : ∀ᵐ v ∂μ, ∀ w', w' ∈ Metric.ball w 1 → HasFDerivAt (fun x ↦ F x v) (F' w' v) w' :=
ae_of_all _ (fun v w' _ ↦ hasFDerivAt_fourierChar_smul L f v w')
exact hasFDerivAt_integral_of_dominated_of_fderiv_le one_pos h1 (h0 w) h3 h4 h5 h6
lemma fderiv_fourierIntegral
[MeasurableSpace V] [BorelSpace V] [SecondCountableTopology V] {μ : Measure V}
(hf : Integrable f μ) (hf' : Integrable (fun v : V ↦ ‖v‖ * ‖f v‖) μ) :
fderiv ℝ (fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ f) =
fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ (fourierSMulRight L f) := by
ext w : 1
exact (hasFDerivAt_fourierIntegral L hf hf' w).fderiv
lemma differentiable_fourierIntegral
[MeasurableSpace V] [BorelSpace V] [SecondCountableTopology V] {μ : Measure V}
(hf : Integrable f μ) (hf' : Integrable (fun v : V ↦ ‖v‖ * ‖f v‖) μ) :
Differentiable ℝ (fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ f) :=
fun w ↦ (hasFDerivAt_fourierIntegral L hf hf' w).differentiableAt
/-- The Fourier integral of the derivative of a function is obtained by multiplying the Fourier
integral of the original function by `-L w v`. -/
theorem fourierIntegral_fderiv [MeasurableSpace V] [BorelSpace V] [FiniteDimensional ℝ V]
{μ : Measure V} [Measure.IsAddHaarMeasure μ]
(hf : Integrable f μ) (h'f : Differentiable ℝ f) (hf' : Integrable (fderiv ℝ f) μ) :
fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ (fderiv ℝ f)
= fourierSMulRight (-L.flip) (fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ f) := by
ext w y
let g (v : V) : ℂ := 𝐞 (-L v w)
/- First rewrite things in a simplified form, without any real change. -/
suffices ∫ x, g x • fderiv ℝ f x y ∂μ = ∫ x, (2 * ↑π * I * L y w * g x) • f x ∂μ by
rw [fourierIntegral_continuousLinearMap_apply' hf']
simpa only [fourierIntegral, ContinuousLinearMap.toLinearMap₂_apply, fourierSMulRight_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.neg_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.flip_apply, ← integral_smul, neg_smul,
smul_neg, ← smul_smul, coe_smul, neg_neg]
-- Key step: integrate by parts with respect to `y` to switch the derivative from `f` to `g`.
have A x : fderiv ℝ g x y = - 2 * ↑π * I * L y w * g x :=
fderiv_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_left_apply _ _ _ _
rw [integral_smul_fderiv_eq_neg_fderiv_smul_of_integrable, ← integral_neg]
· congr with x
simp only [A, neg_mul, neg_smul, neg_neg]
· have : Integrable (fun x ↦ (-(2 * ↑π * I * ↑((L y) w)) • ((g x : ℂ) • f x))) μ :=
((fourierIntegral_convergent_iff' _ _).2 hf).smul _
convert this using 2 with x
simp only [A, neg_mul, neg_smul, smul_smul]
· exact (fourierIntegral_convergent_iff' _ _).2 (hf'.apply_continuousLinearMap _)
· exact (fourierIntegral_convergent_iff' _ _).2 hf
· exact differentiable_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_left _ _
· exact h'f
/-- The formal multilinear series whose `n`-th term is
`(w₁, ..., wₙ) ↦ (-2πI)^n * L v w₁ * ... * L v wₙ • f v`, as a continuous multilinear map in
the space `W [×n]→L[ℝ] E`.
This is designed so that the Fourier transform of `v ↦ fourierPowSMulRight L f v n` is the
`n`-th derivative of the Fourier transform of `f`.
-/
def fourierPowSMulRight (f : V → E) (v : V) : FormalMultilinearSeries ℝ W E := fun n ↦
(- (2 * π * I))^n • ((ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiRing ℝ (Fin n) (f v)).compContinuousLinearMap
(fun _ ↦ L v))
/- Increase the priority to make sure that this lemma is used instead of
`FormalMultilinearSeries.apply_eq_prod_smul_coeff` even in dimension 1. -/
@[simp 1100] lemma fourierPowSMulRight_apply {f : V → E} {v : V} {n : ℕ} {m : Fin n → W} :
fourierPowSMulRight L f v n m = (- (2 * π * I))^n • (∏ i, L v (m i)) • f v := by
simp [fourierPowSMulRight]
open ContinuousMultilinearMap
/-- Decomposing `fourierPowSMulRight L f v n` as a composition of continuous bilinear and
multilinear maps, to deduce easily its continuity and differentiability properties. -/
lemma fourierPowSMulRight_eq_comp {f : V → E} {v : V} {n : ℕ} :
fourierPowSMulRight L f v n = (- (2 * π * I))^n • smulRightL ℝ (fun (_ : Fin n) ↦ W) E
(compContinuousLinearMapLRight
(ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra ℝ (Fin n) ℝ) (fun _ ↦ L v)) (f v) := rfl
@[continuity, fun_prop]
lemma _root_.Continuous.fourierPowSMulRight {f : V → E} (hf : Continuous f) (n : ℕ) :
Continuous (fun v ↦ fourierPowSMulRight L f v n) := by
simp_rw [fourierPowSMulRight_eq_comp]
apply Continuous.const_smul
apply (smulRightL ℝ (fun (_ : Fin n) ↦ W) E).continuous₂.comp₂ _ hf
exact Continuous.comp (map_continuous _) (continuous_pi (fun _ ↦ L.continuous))
lemma _root_.ContDiff.fourierPowSMulRight
{f : V → E} {k : WithTop ℕ∞} (hf : ContDiff ℝ k f) (n : ℕ) :
ContDiff ℝ k (fun v ↦ fourierPowSMulRight L f v n) := by
simp_rw [fourierPowSMulRight_eq_comp]
apply ContDiff.const_smul
apply (smulRightL ℝ (fun (_ : Fin n) ↦ W) E).isBoundedBilinearMap.contDiff.comp₂ _ hf
apply (ContinuousMultilinearMap.contDiff _).comp
exact contDiff_pi.2 (fun _ ↦ L.contDiff)
lemma norm_fourierPowSMulRight_le (f : V → E) (v : V) (n : ℕ) :
‖fourierPowSMulRight L f v n‖ ≤ (2 * π * ‖L‖) ^ n * ‖v‖ ^ n * ‖f v‖ := by
apply ContinuousMultilinearMap.opNorm_le_bound (by positivity) (fun m ↦ ?_)
calc
‖fourierPowSMulRight L f v n m‖
= (2 * π) ^ n * ((∏ x : Fin n, |(L v) (m x)|) * ‖f v‖) := by
simp [abs_of_nonneg pi_nonneg, norm_smul]
_ ≤ (2 * π) ^ n * ((∏ x : Fin n, ‖L‖ * ‖v‖ * ‖m x‖) * ‖f v‖) := by
gcongr with i _hi
exact L.le_opNorm₂ v (m i)
_ = (2 * π * ‖L‖) ^ n * ‖v‖ ^ n * ‖f v‖ * ∏ i : Fin n, ‖m i‖ := by
simp [Finset.prod_mul_distrib, mul_pow]; ring
/-- The iterated derivative of a function multiplied by `(L v ⬝) ^ n` can be controlled in terms
of the iterated derivatives of the initial function. -/
lemma norm_iteratedFDeriv_fourierPowSMulRight
{f : V → E} {K : WithTop ℕ∞} {C : ℝ} (hf : ContDiff ℝ K f) {n : ℕ} {k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ K)
{v : V} (hv : ∀ i ≤ k, ∀ j ≤ n, ‖v‖ ^ j * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ i f v‖ ≤ C) :
‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ k (fun v ↦ fourierPowSMulRight L f v n) v‖ ≤
(2 * π) ^ n * (2 * n + 2) ^ k * ‖L‖ ^ n * C := by
/- We write `fourierPowSMulRight L f v n` as a composition of bilinear and multilinear maps,
thanks to `fourierPowSMulRight_eq_comp`, and then we control the iterated derivatives of these
thanks to general bounds on derivatives of bilinear and multilinear maps. More precisely,
`fourierPowSMulRight L f v n m = (- (2 * π * I))^n • (∏ i, L v (m i)) • f v`. Here,
`(- (2 * π * I))^n` contributes `(2π)^n` to the bound. The second product is bilinear, so the
iterated derivative is controlled as a weighted sum of those of `v ↦ ∏ i, L v (m i)` and of `f`.
The harder part is to control the iterated derivatives of `v ↦ ∏ i, L v (m i)`. For this, one
argues that this is multilinear in `v`, to apply general bounds for iterated derivatives of
multilinear maps. More precisely, we write it as the composition of a multilinear map `T` (making
the product operation) and the tuple of linear maps `v ↦ (L v ⬝, ..., L v ⬝)` -/
simp_rw [fourierPowSMulRight_eq_comp]
-- first step: controlling the iterated derivatives of `v ↦ ∏ i, L v (m i)`, written below
-- as `v ↦ T (fun _ ↦ L v)`, or `T ∘ (ContinuousLinearMap.pi (fun (_ : Fin n) ↦ L))`.
let T : (W →L[ℝ] ℝ) [×n]→L[ℝ] (W [×n]→L[ℝ] ℝ) :=
compContinuousLinearMapLRight (ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra ℝ (Fin n) ℝ)
have I₁ m : ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ m T (fun _ ↦ L v)‖ ≤
n.descFactorial m * 1 * (‖L‖ * ‖v‖) ^ (n - m) := by
have : ‖T‖ ≤ 1 := by
apply (norm_compContinuousLinearMapLRight_le _ _).trans
simp only [norm_mkPiAlgebra, le_refl]
apply (ContinuousMultilinearMap.norm_iteratedFDeriv_le _ _ _).trans
simp only [Fintype.card_fin]
gcongr
refine (pi_norm_le_iff_of_nonneg (by positivity)).mpr (fun _ ↦ ?_)
exact ContinuousLinearMap.le_opNorm _ _
have I₂ m : ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ m (T ∘ (ContinuousLinearMap.pi (fun (_ : Fin n) ↦ L))) v‖ ≤
(n.descFactorial m * 1 * (‖L‖ * ‖v‖) ^ (n - m)) * ‖L‖ ^ m := by
rw [ContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDeriv_comp_right _ (ContinuousMultilinearMap.contDiff _)
_ (mod_cast le_top)]
apply (norm_compContinuousLinearMap_le _ _).trans
simp only [Finset.prod_const, Finset.card_fin]
gcongr
· exact I₁ m
· exact ContinuousLinearMap.norm_pi_le_of_le (fun _ ↦ le_rfl) (norm_nonneg _)
have I₃ m : ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ m (T ∘ (ContinuousLinearMap.pi (fun (_ : Fin n) ↦ L))) v‖ ≤
n.descFactorial m * ‖L‖ ^ n * ‖v‖ ^ (n - m) := by
apply (I₂ m).trans (le_of_eq _)
rcases le_or_lt m n with hm | hm
· rw [show ‖L‖ ^ n = ‖L‖ ^ (m + (n - m)) by rw [Nat.add_sub_cancel' hm], pow_add]
ring
· simp only [Nat.descFactorial_eq_zero_iff_lt.mpr hm, CharP.cast_eq_zero, mul_one, zero_mul]
-- second step: factor out the `(2 * π) ^ n` factor, and cancel it on both sides.
have A : ContDiff ℝ K (fun y ↦ T (fun _ ↦ L y)) :=
(ContinuousMultilinearMap.contDiff _).comp (contDiff_pi.2 fun _ ↦ L.contDiff)
rw [iteratedFDeriv_const_smul_apply' (hf := ((smulRightL ℝ (fun _ ↦ W)
E).isBoundedBilinearMap.contDiff.comp₂ (A.of_le hk) (hf.of_le hk)).contDiffAt),
norm_smul (β := V [×k]→L[ℝ] (W [×n]→L[ℝ] E))]
simp only [mul_assoc, norm_pow, norm_neg, Complex.norm_mul, Complex.norm_ofNat, norm_real,
Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg pi_nonneg, norm_I, mul_one, smulRightL_apply, ge_iff_le]
gcongr
-- third step: argue that the scalar multiplication is bilinear to bound the iterated derivatives
-- of `v ↦ (∏ i, L v (m i)) • f v` in terms of those of `v ↦ (∏ i, L v (m i))` and of `f`.
-- The former are controlled by the first step, the latter by the assumptions.
apply (ContinuousLinearMap.norm_iteratedFDeriv_le_of_bilinear_of_le_one _ A hf _
hk ContinuousMultilinearMap.norm_smulRightL_le).trans
calc
∑ i ∈ Finset.range (k + 1),
k.choose i * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ i (fun (y : V) ↦ T (fun _ ↦ L y)) v‖ *
‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ (k - i) f v‖
≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (k + 1),
k.choose i * (n.descFactorial i * ‖L‖ ^ n * ‖v‖ ^ (n - i)) *
‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ (k - i) f v‖ := by
gcongr with i _hi
exact I₃ i
_ = ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (k + 1), (k.choose i * n.descFactorial i * ‖L‖ ^ n) *
(‖v‖ ^ (n - i) * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ (k - i) f v‖) := by
congr with i
ring
_ ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (k + 1), (k.choose i * (n + 1 : ℕ) ^ k * ‖L‖ ^ n) * C := by
gcongr with i hi
· rw [← Nat.cast_pow, Nat.cast_le]
calc n.descFactorial i ≤ n ^ i := Nat.descFactorial_le_pow _ _
_ ≤ (n + 1) ^ i := by gcongr; omega
_ ≤ (n + 1) ^ k := by gcongr; exacts [le_add_self, Finset.mem_range_succ_iff.mp hi]
· exact hv _ (by omega) _ (by omega)
_ = (2 * n + 2) ^ k * (‖L‖^n * C) := by
simp only [← Finset.sum_mul, ← Nat.cast_sum, Nat.sum_range_choose, mul_one, ← mul_assoc,
Nat.cast_pow, Nat.cast_ofNat, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, ← mul_pow, mul_add]
variable [MeasurableSpace V] [BorelSpace V] {μ : Measure V}
section SecondCountableTopology
variable [SecondCountableTopology V]
lemma _root_.MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.fourierPowSMulRight
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (n : ℕ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun v ↦ fourierPowSMulRight L f v n) μ := by
simp_rw [fourierPowSMulRight_eq_comp]
apply AEStronglyMeasurable.const_smul'
apply (smulRightL ℝ (fun (_ : Fin n) ↦ W) E).continuous₂.comp_aestronglyMeasurable₂ _ hf
apply Continuous.aestronglyMeasurable
exact Continuous.comp (map_continuous _) (continuous_pi (fun _ ↦ L.continuous))
lemma integrable_fourierPowSMulRight {n : ℕ} (hf : Integrable (fun v ↦ ‖v‖ ^ n * ‖f v‖) μ)
(h'f : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) : Integrable (fun v ↦ fourierPowSMulRight L f v n) μ := by
refine (hf.const_mul ((2 * π * ‖L‖) ^ n)).mono' (h'f.fourierPowSMulRight L n) ?_
filter_upwards with v
exact (norm_fourierPowSMulRight_le L f v n).trans (le_of_eq (by ring))
lemma hasFTaylorSeriesUpTo_fourierIntegral {N : WithTop ℕ∞}
(hf : ∀ (n : ℕ), n ≤ N → Integrable (fun v ↦ ‖v‖^n * ‖f v‖) μ)
(h'f : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
HasFTaylorSeriesUpTo N (fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ f)
(fun w n ↦ fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ (fun v ↦ fourierPowSMulRight L f v n) w) := by
constructor
· intro w
rw [curry0_apply, Matrix.zero_empty, fourierIntegral_continuousMultilinearMap_apply'
(integrable_fourierPowSMulRight L (hf 0 bot_le) h'f)]
simp only [fourierPowSMulRight_apply, pow_zero, Finset.univ_eq_empty, Finset.prod_empty,
one_smul]
· intro n hn w
have I₁ : Integrable (fun v ↦ fourierPowSMulRight L f v n) μ :=
integrable_fourierPowSMulRight L (hf n hn.le) h'f
have I₂ : Integrable (fun v ↦ ‖v‖ * ‖fourierPowSMulRight L f v n‖) μ := by
apply ((hf (n+1) (ENat.add_one_natCast_le_withTop_of_lt hn)).const_mul
((2 * π * ‖L‖) ^ n)).mono'
(continuous_norm.aestronglyMeasurable.mul (h'f.fourierPowSMulRight L n).norm)
filter_upwards with v
simp only [Pi.mul_apply, norm_mul, norm_norm]
calc
‖v‖ * ‖fourierPowSMulRight L f v n‖
≤ ‖v‖ * ((2 * π * ‖L‖) ^ n * ‖v‖ ^ n * ‖f v‖) := by
gcongr; apply norm_fourierPowSMulRight_le
_ = (2 * π * ‖L‖) ^ n * (‖v‖ ^ (n + 1) * ‖f v‖) := by rw [pow_succ]; ring
have I₃ : Integrable (fun v ↦ fourierPowSMulRight L f v (n + 1)) μ :=
integrable_fourierPowSMulRight L (hf (n + 1) (ENat.add_one_natCast_le_withTop_of_lt hn)) h'f
have I₄ : Integrable
(fun v ↦ fourierSMulRight L (fun v ↦ fourierPowSMulRight L f v n) v) μ := by
apply (I₂.const_mul ((2 * π * ‖L‖))).mono' (h'f.fourierPowSMulRight L n).fourierSMulRight
filter_upwards with v
exact (norm_fourierSMulRight_le _ _ _).trans (le_of_eq (by ring))
have E : curryLeft
(fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ (fun v ↦ fourierPowSMulRight L f v (n + 1)) w) =
fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂
(fourierSMulRight L fun v ↦ fourierPowSMulRight L f v n) w := by
ext w' m
rw [curryLeft_apply, fourierIntegral_continuousMultilinearMap_apply' I₃,
fourierIntegral_continuousLinearMap_apply' I₄,
fourierIntegral_continuousMultilinearMap_apply' (I₄.apply_continuousLinearMap _)]
congr with v
simp only [fourierPowSMulRight_apply, mul_comm, pow_succ, neg_mul, Fin.prod_univ_succ,
Fin.cons_zero, Fin.cons_succ, neg_smul, fourierSMulRight_apply, neg_apply, smul_apply,
smul_comm (M := ℝ) (N := ℂ) (α := E), smul_smul]
exact E ▸ hasFDerivAt_fourierIntegral L I₁ I₂ w
· intro n hn
| apply fourierIntegral_continuous Real.continuous_fourierChar (by apply L.continuous₂)
exact integrable_fourierPowSMulRight L (hf n hn) h'f
/-- Variant of `hasFTaylorSeriesUpTo_fourierIntegral` in which the smoothness index is restricted
to `ℕ∞` (and so are the inequalities in the assumption `hf`). Avoids normcasting in some
applications. -/
lemma hasFTaylorSeriesUpTo_fourierIntegral' {N : ℕ∞}
(hf : ∀ (n : ℕ), n ≤ N → Integrable (fun v ↦ ‖v‖^n * ‖f v‖) μ)
| Mathlib/Analysis/Fourier/FourierTransformDeriv.lean | 489 | 496 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 . All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Thomas Browning
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Cycle.Type
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.SpecificGroups.Cyclic
/-!
# p-groups
This file contains a proof that if `G` is a `p`-group acting on a finite set `α`,
then the number of fixed points of the action is congruent mod `p` to the cardinality of `α`.
It also contains proofs of some corollaries of this lemma about existence of fixed points.
-/
open Fintype MulAction
variable (p : ℕ) (G : Type*) [Group G]
/-- A p-group is a group in which every element has prime power order -/
def IsPGroup : Prop :=
∀ g : G, ∃ k : ℕ, g ^ p ^ k = 1
variable {p} {G}
namespace IsPGroup
theorem iff_orderOf [hp : Fact p.Prime] : IsPGroup p G ↔ ∀ g : G, ∃ k : ℕ, orderOf g = p ^ k :=
forall_congr' fun g =>
⟨fun ⟨_, hk⟩ =>
Exists.imp (fun _ h => h.right)
((Nat.dvd_prime_pow hp.out).mp (orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hk)),
Exists.imp fun k hk => by rw [← hk, pow_orderOf_eq_one]⟩
theorem of_card {n : ℕ} (hG : Nat.card G = p ^ n) : IsPGroup p G := fun g =>
⟨n, by rw [← hG, pow_card_eq_one']⟩
theorem of_bot : IsPGroup p (⊥ : Subgroup G) :=
of_card (n := 0) (by rw [Subgroup.card_bot, pow_zero])
theorem iff_card [Fact p.Prime] [Finite G] : IsPGroup p G ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, Nat.card G = p ^ n := by
have hG : Nat.card G ≠ 0 := Nat.card_pos.ne'
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨n, hn⟩ => of_card hn⟩
suffices ∀ q ∈ (Nat.card G).primeFactorsList, q = p by
use (Nat.card G).primeFactorsList.length
rw [← List.prod_replicate, ← List.eq_replicate_of_mem this, Nat.prod_primeFactorsList hG]
intro q hq
obtain ⟨hq1, hq2⟩ := (Nat.mem_primeFactorsList hG).mp hq
haveI : Fact q.Prime := ⟨hq1⟩
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := exists_prime_orderOf_dvd_card' q hq2
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := (iff_orderOf.mp h) g
exact (hq1.pow_eq_iff.mp (hg.symm.trans hk).symm).1.symm
alias ⟨exists_card_eq, _⟩ := iff_card
section GIsPGroup
variable (hG : IsPGroup p G)
include hG
theorem of_injective {H : Type*} [Group H] (ϕ : H →* G) (hϕ : Function.Injective ϕ) :
IsPGroup p H := by
simp_rw [IsPGroup, ← hϕ.eq_iff, ϕ.map_pow, ϕ.map_one]
exact fun h => hG (ϕ h)
theorem to_subgroup (H : Subgroup G) : IsPGroup p H :=
hG.of_injective H.subtype Subtype.coe_injective
theorem of_surjective {H : Type*} [Group H] (ϕ : G →* H) (hϕ : Function.Surjective ϕ) :
IsPGroup p H := by
refine fun h => Exists.elim (hϕ h) fun g hg => Exists.imp (fun k hk => ?_) (hG g)
rw [← hg, ← ϕ.map_pow, hk, ϕ.map_one]
theorem to_quotient (H : Subgroup G) [H.Normal] : IsPGroup p (G ⧸ H) :=
hG.of_surjective (QuotientGroup.mk' H) Quotient.mk''_surjective
theorem of_equiv {H : Type*} [Group H] (ϕ : G ≃* H) : IsPGroup p H :=
hG.of_surjective ϕ.toMonoidHom ϕ.surjective
theorem orderOf_coprime {n : ℕ} (hn : p.Coprime n) (g : G) : (orderOf g).Coprime n :=
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := hG g
(hn.pow_left k).coprime_dvd_left (orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hk)
/-- If `gcd(p,n) = 1`, then the `n`th power map is a bijection. -/
noncomputable def powEquiv {n : ℕ} (hn : p.Coprime n) : G ≃ G :=
let h : ∀ g : G, (Nat.card (Subgroup.zpowers g)).Coprime n := fun g =>
(Nat.card_zpowers g).symm ▸ hG.orderOf_coprime hn g
{ toFun := (· ^ n)
invFun := fun g => (powCoprime (h g)).symm ⟨g, Subgroup.mem_zpowers g⟩
left_inv := fun g =>
Subtype.ext_iff.1 <|
(powCoprime (h (g ^ n))).left_inv
⟨g, _, Subtype.ext_iff.1 <| (powCoprime (h g)).left_inv ⟨g, Subgroup.mem_zpowers g⟩⟩
right_inv := fun g =>
Subtype.ext_iff.1 <| (powCoprime (h g)).right_inv ⟨g, Subgroup.mem_zpowers g⟩ }
@[simp]
theorem powEquiv_apply {n : ℕ} (hn : p.Coprime n) (g : G) : hG.powEquiv hn g = g ^ n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem powEquiv_symm_apply {n : ℕ} (hn : p.Coprime n) (g : G) :
(hG.powEquiv hn).symm g = g ^ (orderOf g).gcdB n := by rw [← Nat.card_zpowers]; rfl
variable [hp : Fact p.Prime]
/-- If `p ∤ n`, then the `n`th power map is a bijection. -/
noncomputable abbrev powEquiv' {n : ℕ} (hn : ¬p ∣ n) : G ≃ G :=
powEquiv hG (hp.out.coprime_iff_not_dvd.mpr hn)
theorem index (H : Subgroup G) [H.FiniteIndex] : ∃ n : ℕ, H.index = p ^ n := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := iff_card.mp (hG.to_quotient H.normalCore)
obtain ⟨k, _, hk2⟩ :=
(Nat.dvd_prime_pow hp.out).mp
((congr_arg _ (H.normalCore.index_eq_card.trans hn)).mp
(Subgroup.index_dvd_of_le H.normalCore_le))
exact ⟨k, hk2⟩
theorem card_eq_or_dvd : Nat.card G = 1 ∨ p ∣ Nat.card G := by
cases finite_or_infinite G
· obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := iff_card.mp hG
rw [hn]
rcases n with - | n
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr ⟨p ^ n, by rw [pow_succ']⟩
· rw [Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite]
exact Or.inr ⟨0, rfl⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_card [Finite G] : Nontrivial G ↔ ∃ n > 0, Nat.card G = p ^ n :=
⟨fun hGnt =>
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := iff_card.1 hG
⟨k,
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero fun hk0 => by
rw [hk0, pow_zero] at hk; exact Finite.one_lt_card.ne' hk,
hk⟩,
fun ⟨_, hk0, hk⟩ =>
Finite.one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial.1 <|
hk.symm ▸ one_lt_pow₀ (Fact.out (p := p.Prime)).one_lt (ne_of_gt hk0)⟩
variable {α : Type*} [MulAction G α]
theorem card_orbit (a : α) [Finite (orbit G a)] : ∃ n : ℕ, Nat.card (orbit G a) = p ^ n := by
let ϕ := orbitEquivQuotientStabilizer G a
haveI := Finite.of_equiv (orbit G a) ϕ
haveI := (stabilizer G a).finiteIndex_of_finite_quotient
rw [Nat.card_congr ϕ]
exact hG.index (stabilizer G a)
variable (α) [Finite α]
/-- If `G` is a `p`-group acting on a finite set `α`, then the number of fixed points
of the action is congruent mod `p` to the cardinality of `α` -/
theorem card_modEq_card_fixedPoints : Nat.card α ≡ Nat.card (fixedPoints G α) [MOD p] := by
have := Fintype.ofFinite α
have := Fintype.ofFinite (fixedPoints G α)
rw [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card]
classical
calc
card α = card (Σy : Quotient (orbitRel G α), { x // Quotient.mk'' x = y }) :=
card_congr (Equiv.sigmaFiberEquiv (@Quotient.mk'' _ (orbitRel G α))).symm
_ = ∑ a : Quotient (orbitRel G α), card { x // Quotient.mk'' x = a } := card_sigma
_ ≡ ∑ _a : fixedPoints G α, 1 [MOD p] := ?_
_ = _ := by simp
rw [← ZMod.eq_iff_modEq_nat p, Nat.cast_sum, Nat.cast_sum]
have key :
∀ x,
card { y // (Quotient.mk'' y : Quotient (orbitRel G α)) = Quotient.mk'' x } =
card (orbit G x) :=
fun x => by simp only [Quotient.eq'']; congr
refine
Eq.symm
(Finset.sum_bij_ne_zero (fun a _ _ => Quotient.mk'' a.1) (fun _ _ _ => Finset.mem_univ _)
(fun a₁ _ _ a₂ _ _ h =>
Subtype.eq (mem_fixedPoints'.mp a₂.2 a₁.1 (Quotient.exact' h)))
(fun b => Quotient.inductionOn' b fun b _ hb => ?_) fun a ha _ => by
rw [key, mem_fixedPoints_iff_card_orbit_eq_one.mp a.2])
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := hG.card_orbit b
rw [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card] at hk
have : k = 0 := by
contrapose! hb
simp [-Quotient.eq, key, hk, hb]
exact
⟨⟨b, mem_fixedPoints_iff_card_orbit_eq_one.2 <| by rw [hk, this, pow_zero]⟩,
Finset.mem_univ _, ne_of_eq_of_ne Nat.cast_one one_ne_zero, rfl⟩
/-- If a p-group acts on `α` and the cardinality of `α` is not a multiple
of `p` then the action has a fixed point. -/
theorem nonempty_fixed_point_of_prime_not_dvd_card (α) [MulAction G α] (hpα : ¬p ∣ Nat.card α) :
(fixedPoints G α).Nonempty :=
have : Finite α := Nat.finite_of_card_ne_zero (fun h ↦ (h ▸ hpα) (dvd_zero p))
@Set.Nonempty.of_subtype _ _
(by
rw [← Finite.card_pos_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero]
contrapose! hpα
rw [← Nat.modEq_zero_iff_dvd, ← hpα]
exact hG.card_modEq_card_fixedPoints α)
/-- If a p-group acts on `α` and the cardinality of `α` is a multiple
of `p`, and the action has one fixed point, then it has another fixed point. -/
theorem exists_fixed_point_of_prime_dvd_card_of_fixed_point (hpα : p ∣ Nat.card α) {a : α}
(ha : a ∈ fixedPoints G α) : ∃ b, b ∈ fixedPoints G α ∧ a ≠ b := by
have hpf : p ∣ Nat.card (fixedPoints G α) :=
Nat.modEq_zero_iff_dvd.mp ((hG.card_modEq_card_fixedPoints α).symm.trans hpα.modEq_zero_nat)
have hα : 1 < Nat.card (fixedPoints G α) :=
(Fact.out (p := p.Prime)).one_lt.trans_le (Nat.le_of_dvd (Finite.card_pos_iff.2 ⟨⟨a, ha⟩⟩) hpf)
rw [Finite.one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial] at hα
exact
let ⟨⟨b, hb⟩, hba⟩ := exists_ne (⟨a, ha⟩ : fixedPoints G α)
⟨b, hb, fun hab => hba (by simp_rw [hab])⟩
theorem center_nontrivial [Nontrivial G] [Finite G] : Nontrivial (Subgroup.center G) := by
classical
have := (hG.of_equiv ConjAct.toConjAct).exists_fixed_point_of_prime_dvd_card_of_fixed_point G
rw [ConjAct.fixedPoints_eq_center] at this
have dvd : p ∣ Nat.card G := by
obtain ⟨n, hn0, hn⟩ := hG.nontrivial_iff_card.mp inferInstance
exact hn.symm ▸ dvd_pow_self _ (ne_of_gt hn0)
| obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := this dvd (Subgroup.center G).one_mem
exact ⟨⟨1, ⟨g, hg.1⟩, mt Subtype.ext_iff.mp hg.2⟩⟩
theorem bot_lt_center [Nontrivial G] [Finite G] : ⊥ < Subgroup.center G := by
haveI := center_nontrivial hG
classical exact
bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr ((Subgroup.center G).one_lt_card_iff_ne_bot.mp Finite.one_lt_card)
end GIsPGroup
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/PGroup.lean | 219 | 227 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.ImproperIntegrals
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.ExpDecay
/-!
# The Gamma function
This file defines the `Γ` function (of a real or complex variable `s`). We define this by Euler's
integral `Γ(s) = ∫ x in Ioi 0, exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)` in the range where this integral converges
(i.e., for `0 < s` in the real case, and `0 < re s` in the complex case).
We show that this integral satisfies `Γ(1) = 1` and `Γ(s + 1) = s * Γ(s)`; hence we can define
`Γ(s)` for all `s` as the unique function satisfying this recurrence and agreeing with Euler's
integral in the convergence range. (If `s = -n` for `n ∈ ℕ`, then the function is undefined, and we
set it to be `0` by convention.)
## Gamma function: main statements (complex case)
* `Complex.Gamma`: the `Γ` function (of a complex variable).
* `Complex.Gamma_eq_integral`: for `0 < re s`, `Γ(s)` agrees with Euler's integral.
* `Complex.Gamma_add_one`: for all `s : ℂ` with `s ≠ 0`, we have `Γ (s + 1) = s Γ(s)`.
* `Complex.Gamma_nat_eq_factorial`: for all `n : ℕ` we have `Γ (n + 1) = n!`.
## Gamma function: main statements (real case)
* `Real.Gamma`: the `Γ` function (of a real variable).
* Real counterparts of all the properties of the complex Gamma function listed above:
`Real.Gamma_eq_integral`, `Real.Gamma_add_one`, `Real.Gamma_nat_eq_factorial`.
## Tags
Gamma
-/
noncomputable section
open Filter intervalIntegral Set Real MeasureTheory Asymptotics
open scoped Nat Topology ComplexConjugate
namespace Real
/-- Asymptotic bound for the `Γ` function integrand. -/
theorem Gamma_integrand_isLittleO (s : ℝ) :
(fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ s) =o[atTop] fun x : ℝ => exp (-(1 / 2) * x) := by
refine isLittleO_of_tendsto (fun x hx => ?_) ?_
· exfalso; exact (exp_pos (-(1 / 2) * x)).ne' hx
have : (fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ s / exp (-(1 / 2) * x)) =
(fun x : ℝ => exp (1 / 2 * x) / x ^ s)⁻¹ := by
ext1 x
field_simp [exp_ne_zero, exp_neg, ← Real.exp_add]
left
ring
rw [this]
exact (tendsto_exp_mul_div_rpow_atTop s (1 / 2) one_half_pos).inv_tendsto_atTop
/-- The Euler integral for the `Γ` function converges for positive real `s`. -/
theorem GammaIntegral_convergent {s : ℝ} (h : 0 < s) :
IntegrableOn (fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)) (Ioi 0) := by
rw [← Ioc_union_Ioi_eq_Ioi (@zero_le_one ℝ _ _ _ _), integrableOn_union]
constructor
· rw [← integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ioc]
refine IntegrableOn.continuousOn_mul continuousOn_id.neg.rexp ?_ isCompact_Icc
refine (intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Icc_of_le zero_le_one).mp ?_
exact intervalIntegrable_rpow' (by linarith)
· refine integrable_of_isBigO_exp_neg one_half_pos ?_ (Gamma_integrand_isLittleO _).isBigO
refine continuousOn_id.neg.rexp.mul (continuousOn_id.rpow_const ?_)
intro x hx
exact Or.inl ((zero_lt_one : (0 : ℝ) < 1).trans_le hx).ne'
end Real
namespace Complex
/- Technical note: In defining the Gamma integrand exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1) for s complex, we have to
make a choice between ↑(Real.exp (-x)), Complex.exp (↑(-x)), and Complex.exp (-↑x), all of which are
equal but not definitionally so. We use the first of these throughout. -/
/-- The integral defining the `Γ` function converges for complex `s` with `0 < re s`.
This is proved by reduction to the real case. -/
theorem GammaIntegral_convergent {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) :
IntegrableOn (fun x => (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) (Ioi 0) := by
constructor
· refine ContinuousOn.aestronglyMeasurable ?_ measurableSet_Ioi
apply (continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_neg.rexp).continuousOn.mul
apply continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt
intro x hx
have : ContinuousAt (fun x : ℂ => x ^ (s - 1)) ↑x :=
continuousAt_cpow_const <| ofReal_mem_slitPlane.2 hx
exact ContinuousAt.comp this continuous_ofReal.continuousAt
· rw [← hasFiniteIntegral_norm_iff]
refine HasFiniteIntegral.congr (Real.GammaIntegral_convergent hs).2 ?_
apply (ae_restrict_iff' measurableSet_Ioi).mpr
filter_upwards with x hx
rw [norm_mul, Complex.norm_of_nonneg <| le_of_lt <| exp_pos <| -x,
norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx _]
simp
/-- Euler's integral for the `Γ` function (of a complex variable `s`), defined as
`∫ x in Ioi 0, exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)`.
See `Complex.GammaIntegral_convergent` for a proof of the convergence of the integral for
`0 < re s`. -/
def GammaIntegral (s : ℂ) : ℂ :=
∫ x in Ioi (0 : ℝ), ↑(-x).exp * ↑x ^ (s - 1)
theorem GammaIntegral_conj (s : ℂ) : GammaIntegral (conj s) = conj (GammaIntegral s) := by
rw [GammaIntegral, GammaIntegral, ← integral_conj]
refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi fun x hx => ?_
dsimp only
rw [RingHom.map_mul, conj_ofReal, cpow_def_of_ne_zero (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr (ne_of_gt hx)),
cpow_def_of_ne_zero (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr (ne_of_gt hx)), ← exp_conj, RingHom.map_mul, ←
ofReal_log (le_of_lt hx), conj_ofReal, RingHom.map_sub, RingHom.map_one]
theorem GammaIntegral_ofReal (s : ℝ) :
GammaIntegral ↑s = ↑(∫ x : ℝ in Ioi 0, Real.exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)) := by
have : ∀ r : ℝ, Complex.ofReal r = @RCLike.ofReal ℂ _ r := fun r => rfl
rw [GammaIntegral]
conv_rhs => rw [this, ← _root_.integral_ofReal]
refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi ?_
intro x hx; dsimp only
conv_rhs => rw [← this]
rw [ofReal_mul, ofReal_cpow (mem_Ioi.mp hx).le]
simp
@[simp]
theorem GammaIntegral_one : GammaIntegral 1 = 1 := by
simpa only [← ofReal_one, GammaIntegral_ofReal, ofReal_inj, sub_self, rpow_zero,
mul_one] using integral_exp_neg_Ioi_zero
end Complex
/-! Now we establish the recurrence relation `Γ(s + 1) = s * Γ(s)` using integration by parts. -/
namespace Complex
section GammaRecurrence
/-- The indefinite version of the `Γ` function, `Γ(s, X) = ∫ x ∈ 0..X, exp(-x) x ^ (s - 1)`. -/
def partialGamma (s : ℂ) (X : ℝ) : ℂ :=
∫ x in (0)..X, (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1)
theorem tendsto_partialGamma {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) :
Tendsto (fun X : ℝ => partialGamma s X) atTop (𝓝 <| GammaIntegral s) :=
intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral_Ioi 0 (GammaIntegral_convergent hs) tendsto_id
private theorem Gamma_integrand_intervalIntegrable (s : ℂ) {X : ℝ} (hs : 0 < s.re) (hX : 0 ≤ X) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 X := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le hX]
exact IntegrableOn.mono_set (GammaIntegral_convergent hs) Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
private theorem Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_A {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) {X : ℝ} (hX : 0 ≤ X) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => -((-x).exp * x ^ s) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 X := by
convert (Gamma_integrand_intervalIntegrable (s + 1) _ hX).neg
· simp only [ofReal_exp, ofReal_neg, add_sub_cancel_right]; rfl
· simp only [add_re, one_re]; linarith
private theorem Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_B {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) {Y : ℝ} (hY : 0 ≤ Y) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x : ℝ => (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 Y := by
have : (fun x => (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) =
(fun x => s * ((-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) := by ext1; ring
rw [this, intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le hY]
constructor
· refine (continuousOn_const.mul ?_).aestronglyMeasurable measurableSet_Ioc
apply (continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_neg.rexp).continuousOn.mul
apply continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt
intro x hx
refine (?_ : ContinuousAt (fun x : ℂ => x ^ (s - 1)) _).comp continuous_ofReal.continuousAt
exact continuousAt_cpow_const <| ofReal_mem_slitPlane.2 hx.1
rw [← hasFiniteIntegral_norm_iff]
simp_rw [norm_mul]
refine (((Real.GammaIntegral_convergent hs).mono_set
Ioc_subset_Ioi_self).hasFiniteIntegral.congr ?_).const_mul _
rw [EventuallyEq, ae_restrict_iff']
· filter_upwards with x hx
rw [Complex.norm_of_nonneg (exp_pos _).le, norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx.1]
simp
· exact measurableSet_Ioc
/-- The recurrence relation for the indefinite version of the `Γ` function. -/
theorem partialGamma_add_one {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) {X : ℝ} (hX : 0 ≤ X) :
partialGamma (s + 1) X = s * partialGamma s X - (-X).exp * X ^ s := by
rw [partialGamma, partialGamma, add_sub_cancel_right]
have F_der_I : ∀ x : ℝ, x ∈ Ioo 0 X → HasDerivAt (fun x => (-x).exp * x ^ s : ℝ → ℂ)
(-((-x).exp * x ^ s) + (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1))) x := by
intro x hx
have d1 : HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (-y).exp) (-(-x).exp) x := by
simpa using (hasDerivAt_neg x).exp
have d2 : HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (y : ℂ) ^ s) (s * x ^ (s - 1)) x := by
have t := @HasDerivAt.cpow_const _ _ _ s (hasDerivAt_id ↑x) ?_
· simpa only [mul_one] using t.comp_ofReal
· exact ofReal_mem_slitPlane.2 hx.1
simpa only [ofReal_neg, neg_mul] using d1.ofReal_comp.mul d2
have cont := (continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_neg.rexp).mul (continuous_ofReal_cpow_const hs)
have der_ible :=
(Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_A hs hX).add (Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_B hs hX)
have int_eval := integral_eq_sub_of_hasDerivAt_of_le hX cont.continuousOn F_der_I der_ible
-- We are basically done here but manipulating the output into the right form is fiddly.
apply_fun fun x : ℂ => -x at int_eval
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_add (Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_A hs hX)
(Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_B hs hX),
intervalIntegral.integral_neg, neg_add, neg_neg] at int_eval
rw [eq_sub_of_add_eq int_eval, sub_neg_eq_add, neg_sub, add_comm, add_sub]
have : (fun x => (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) =
(fun x => s * (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) := by ext1; ring
rw [this]
have t := @integral_const_mul 0 X volume _ _ s fun x : ℝ => (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1)
rw [← t, ofReal_zero, zero_cpow]
· rw [mul_zero, add_zero]; congr 2; ext1; ring
· contrapose! hs; rw [hs, zero_re]
/-- The recurrence relation for the `Γ` integral. -/
theorem GammaIntegral_add_one {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) :
GammaIntegral (s + 1) = s * GammaIntegral s := by
suffices Tendsto (s + 1).partialGamma atTop (𝓝 <| s * GammaIntegral s) by
refine tendsto_nhds_unique ?_ this
apply tendsto_partialGamma; rw [add_re, one_re]; linarith
have : (fun X : ℝ => s * partialGamma s X - X ^ s * (-X).exp) =ᶠ[atTop]
(s + 1).partialGamma := by
apply eventuallyEq_of_mem (Ici_mem_atTop (0 : ℝ))
intro X hX
rw [partialGamma_add_one hs (mem_Ici.mp hX)]
ring_nf
refine Tendsto.congr' this ?_
suffices Tendsto (fun X => -X ^ s * (-X).exp : ℝ → ℂ) atTop (𝓝 0) by
simpa using Tendsto.add (Tendsto.const_mul s (tendsto_partialGamma hs)) this
rw [tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero]
have :
(fun e : ℝ => ‖-(e : ℂ) ^ s * (-e).exp‖) =ᶠ[atTop] fun e : ℝ => e ^ s.re * (-1 * e).exp := by
refine eventuallyEq_of_mem (Ioi_mem_atTop 0) ?_
intro x hx; dsimp only
rw [norm_mul, norm_neg, norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx,
Complex.norm_of_nonneg (exp_pos (-x)).le, neg_mul, one_mul]
exact (tendsto_congr' this).mpr (tendsto_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_atTop_nhds_zero _ _ zero_lt_one)
end GammaRecurrence
/-! Now we define `Γ(s)` on the whole complex plane, by recursion. -/
section GammaDef
/-- The `n`th function in this family is `Γ(s)` if `-n < s.re`, and junk otherwise. -/
noncomputable def GammaAux : ℕ → ℂ → ℂ
| 0 => GammaIntegral
| n + 1 => fun s : ℂ => GammaAux n (s + 1) / s
theorem GammaAux_recurrence1 (s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) (h1 : -s.re < ↑n) :
GammaAux n s = GammaAux n (s + 1) / s := by
induction' n with n hn generalizing s
· simp only [CharP.cast_eq_zero, Left.neg_neg_iff] at h1
dsimp only [GammaAux]; rw [GammaIntegral_add_one h1]
rw [mul_comm, mul_div_cancel_right₀]; contrapose! h1; rw [h1]
simp
· dsimp only [GammaAux]
have hh1 : -(s + 1).re < n := by
rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one] at h1
rw [add_re, one_re]; linarith
rw [← hn (s + 1) hh1]
theorem GammaAux_recurrence2 (s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) (h1 : -s.re < ↑n) :
GammaAux n s = GammaAux (n + 1) s := by
rcases n with - | n
· simp only [CharP.cast_eq_zero, Left.neg_neg_iff] at h1
dsimp only [GammaAux]
rw [GammaIntegral_add_one h1, mul_div_cancel_left₀]
rintro rfl
rw [zero_re] at h1
exact h1.false
· dsimp only [GammaAux]
have : GammaAux n (s + 1 + 1) / (s + 1) = GammaAux n (s + 1) := by
have hh1 : -(s + 1).re < n := by
rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one] at h1
rw [add_re, one_re]; linarith
rw [GammaAux_recurrence1 (s + 1) n hh1]
rw [this]
/-- The `Γ` function (of a complex variable `s`). -/
@[pp_nodot]
irreducible_def Gamma (s : ℂ) : ℂ :=
GammaAux ⌊1 - s.re⌋₊ s
theorem Gamma_eq_GammaAux (s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) (h1 : -s.re < ↑n) : Gamma s = GammaAux n s := by
have u : ∀ k : ℕ, GammaAux (⌊1 - s.re⌋₊ + k) s = Gamma s := by
intro k; induction' k with k hk
· simp [Gamma]
· rw [← hk, ← add_assoc]
refine (GammaAux_recurrence2 s (⌊1 - s.re⌋₊ + k) ?_).symm
rw [Nat.cast_add]
have i0 := Nat.sub_one_lt_floor (1 - s.re)
simp only [sub_sub_cancel_left] at i0
refine lt_add_of_lt_of_nonneg i0 ?_
rw [← Nat.cast_zero, Nat.cast_le]; exact Nat.zero_le k
convert (u <| n - ⌊1 - s.re⌋₊).symm; rw [Nat.add_sub_of_le]
by_cases h : 0 ≤ 1 - s.re
· apply Nat.le_of_lt_succ
exact_mod_cast lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.floor_le h) (by linarith : 1 - s.re < n + 1)
· rw [Nat.floor_of_nonpos]
· omega
· linarith
/-- The recurrence relation for the `Γ` function. -/
theorem Gamma_add_one (s : ℂ) (h2 : s ≠ 0) : Gamma (s + 1) = s * Gamma s := by
let n := ⌊1 - s.re⌋₊
have t1 : -s.re < n := by simpa only [sub_sub_cancel_left] using Nat.sub_one_lt_floor (1 - s.re)
have t2 : -(s + 1).re < n := by rw [add_re, one_re]; linarith
rw [Gamma_eq_GammaAux s n t1, Gamma_eq_GammaAux (s + 1) n t2, GammaAux_recurrence1 s n t1]
field_simp
theorem Gamma_eq_integral {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) : Gamma s = GammaIntegral s :=
Gamma_eq_GammaAux s 0 (by norm_cast; linarith)
@[simp]
theorem Gamma_one : Gamma 1 = 1 := by rw [Gamma_eq_integral] <;> simp
theorem Gamma_nat_eq_factorial (n : ℕ) : Gamma (n + 1) = n ! := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n hn =>
rw [Gamma_add_one n.succ <| Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr <| Nat.succ_ne_zero n]
simp only [Nat.cast_succ, Nat.factorial_succ, Nat.cast_mul]
congr
@[simp]
theorem Gamma_ofNat_eq_factorial (n : ℕ) [(n + 1).AtLeastTwo] :
Gamma (ofNat(n + 1) : ℂ) = n ! :=
mod_cast Gamma_nat_eq_factorial (n : ℕ)
/-- At `0` the Gamma function is undefined; by convention we assign it the value `0`. -/
@[simp]
theorem Gamma_zero : Gamma 0 = 0 := by
simp_rw [Gamma, zero_re, sub_zero, Nat.floor_one, GammaAux, div_zero]
/-- At `-n` for `n ∈ ℕ`, the Gamma function is undefined; by convention we assign it the value 0. -/
theorem Gamma_neg_nat_eq_zero (n : ℕ) : Gamma (-n) = 0 := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [Nat.cast_zero, neg_zero, Gamma_zero]
| succ n IH =>
have A : -(n.succ : ℂ) ≠ 0 := by
rw [neg_ne_zero, Nat.cast_ne_zero]
apply Nat.succ_ne_zero
have : -(n : ℂ) = -↑n.succ + 1 := by simp
rw [this, Gamma_add_one _ A] at IH
contrapose! IH
exact mul_ne_zero A IH
theorem Gamma_conj (s : ℂ) : Gamma (conj s) = conj (Gamma s) := by
suffices ∀ (n : ℕ) (s : ℂ), GammaAux n (conj s) = conj (GammaAux n s) by
simp [Gamma, this]
intro n
induction n with
| zero => rw [GammaAux]; exact GammaIntegral_conj
| succ n IH =>
intro s
rw [GammaAux]
dsimp only
rw [div_eq_mul_inv _ s, RingHom.map_mul, conj_inv, ← div_eq_mul_inv]
suffices conj s + 1 = conj (s + 1) by rw [this, IH]
rw [RingHom.map_add, RingHom.map_one]
/-- Expresses the integral over `Ioi 0` of `t ^ (a - 1) * exp (-(r * t))` in terms of the Gamma
function, for complex `a`. -/
lemma integral_cpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_Ioi {a : ℂ} {r : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a.re) (hr : 0 < r) :
∫ (t : ℝ) in Ioi 0, t ^ (a - 1) * exp (-(r * t)) = (1 / r) ^ a * Gamma a := by
have aux : (1 / r : ℂ) ^ a = 1 / r * (1 / r) ^ (a - 1) := by
nth_rewrite 2 [← cpow_one (1 / r : ℂ)]
rw [← cpow_add _ _ (one_div_ne_zero <| ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hr.ne'), add_sub_cancel]
calc
_ = ∫ (t : ℝ) in Ioi 0, (1 / r) ^ (a - 1) * (r * t) ^ (a - 1) * exp (-(r * t)) := by
refine MeasureTheory.setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi (fun x hx ↦ ?_)
rw [mem_Ioi] at hx
rw [mul_cpow_ofReal_nonneg hr.le hx.le, ← mul_assoc, one_div, ← ofReal_inv,
← mul_cpow_ofReal_nonneg (inv_pos.mpr hr).le hr.le, ← ofReal_mul r⁻¹,
inv_mul_cancel₀ hr.ne', ofReal_one, one_cpow, one_mul]
_ = 1 / r * ∫ (t : ℝ) in Ioi 0, (1 / r) ^ (a - 1) * t ^ (a - 1) * exp (-t) := by
simp_rw [← ofReal_mul]
rw [integral_comp_mul_left_Ioi (fun x ↦ _ * x ^ (a - 1) * exp (-x)) _ hr, mul_zero,
real_smul, ← one_div, ofReal_div, ofReal_one]
_ = 1 / r * (1 / r : ℂ) ^ (a - 1) * (∫ (t : ℝ) in Ioi 0, t ^ (a - 1) * exp (-t)) := by
simp_rw [← MeasureTheory.integral_const_mul, mul_assoc]
_ = (1 / r) ^ a * Gamma a := by
rw [aux, Gamma_eq_integral ha]
congr 2 with x
rw [ofReal_exp, ofReal_neg, mul_comm]
end GammaDef
end Complex
namespace Real
/-- The `Γ` function (of a real variable `s`). -/
@[pp_nodot]
def Gamma (s : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(Complex.Gamma s).re
theorem Gamma_eq_integral {s : ℝ} (hs : 0 < s) :
Gamma s = ∫ x in Ioi 0, exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1) := by
rw [Gamma, Complex.Gamma_eq_integral (by rwa [Complex.ofReal_re] : 0 < Complex.re s)]
dsimp only [Complex.GammaIntegral]
simp_rw [← Complex.ofReal_one, ← Complex.ofReal_sub]
suffices ∫ x : ℝ in Ioi 0, ↑(exp (-x)) * (x : ℂ) ^ ((s - 1 : ℝ) : ℂ) =
∫ x : ℝ in Ioi 0, ((exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1) : ℝ) : ℂ) by
have cc : ∀ r : ℝ, Complex.ofReal r = @RCLike.ofReal ℂ _ r := fun r => rfl
conv_lhs => rw [this]; enter [1, 2, x]; rw [cc]
rw [_root_.integral_ofReal, ← cc, Complex.ofReal_re]
refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi fun x hx => ?_
push_cast
rw [Complex.ofReal_cpow (le_of_lt hx)]
push_cast; rfl
theorem Gamma_add_one {s : ℝ} (hs : s ≠ 0) : Gamma (s + 1) = s * Gamma s := by
simp_rw [Gamma]
rw [Complex.ofReal_add, Complex.ofReal_one, Complex.Gamma_add_one, Complex.re_ofReal_mul]
rwa [Complex.ofReal_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem Gamma_one : Gamma 1 = 1 := by
rw [Gamma, Complex.ofReal_one, Complex.Gamma_one, Complex.one_re]
theorem _root_.Complex.Gamma_ofReal (s : ℝ) : Complex.Gamma (s : ℂ) = Gamma s := by
rw [Gamma, eq_comm, ← Complex.conj_eq_iff_re, ← Complex.Gamma_conj, Complex.conj_ofReal]
theorem Gamma_nat_eq_factorial (n : ℕ) : Gamma (n + 1) = n ! := by
rw [Gamma, Complex.ofReal_add, Complex.ofReal_natCast, Complex.ofReal_one,
Complex.Gamma_nat_eq_factorial, ← Complex.ofReal_natCast, Complex.ofReal_re]
@[simp]
theorem Gamma_ofNat_eq_factorial (n : ℕ) [(n + 1).AtLeastTwo] :
Gamma (ofNat(n + 1) : ℝ) = n ! :=
mod_cast Gamma_nat_eq_factorial (n : ℕ)
/-- At `0` the Gamma function is undefined; by convention we assign it the value `0`. -/
@[simp]
theorem Gamma_zero : Gamma 0 = 0 := by
simpa only [← Complex.ofReal_zero, Complex.Gamma_ofReal, Complex.ofReal_inj] using
Complex.Gamma_zero
/-- At `-n` for `n ∈ ℕ`, the Gamma function is undefined; by convention we assign it the value `0`.
-/
theorem Gamma_neg_nat_eq_zero (n : ℕ) : Gamma (-n) = 0 := by
simpa only [← Complex.ofReal_natCast, ← Complex.ofReal_neg, Complex.Gamma_ofReal,
Complex.ofReal_eq_zero] using Complex.Gamma_neg_nat_eq_zero n
theorem Gamma_pos_of_pos {s : ℝ} (hs : 0 < s) : 0 < Gamma s := by
rw [Gamma_eq_integral hs]
have : (Function.support fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)) ∩ Ioi 0 = Ioi 0 := by
rw [inter_eq_right]
intro x hx
rw [Function.mem_support]
exact mul_ne_zero (exp_pos _).ne' (rpow_pos_of_pos hx _).ne'
rw [setIntegral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae]
· rw [this, volume_Ioi, ← ENNReal.ofReal_zero]
exact ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top
· refine eventually_of_mem (self_mem_ae_restrict measurableSet_Ioi) ?_
exact fun x hx => (mul_pos (exp_pos _) (rpow_pos_of_pos hx _)).le
· exact GammaIntegral_convergent hs
theorem Gamma_nonneg_of_nonneg {s : ℝ} (hs : 0 ≤ s) : 0 ≤ Gamma s := by
obtain rfl | h := eq_or_lt_of_le hs
· rw [Gamma_zero]
· exact (Gamma_pos_of_pos h).le
open Complex in
/-- Expresses the integral over `Ioi 0` of `t ^ (a - 1) * exp (-(r * t))`, for positive real `r`,
in terms of the Gamma function. -/
lemma integral_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_Ioi {a r : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a) (hr : 0 < r) :
∫ t : ℝ in Ioi 0, t ^ (a - 1) * exp (-(r * t)) = (1 / r) ^ a * Gamma a := by
rw [← ofReal_inj, ofReal_mul, ← Gamma_ofReal, ofReal_cpow (by positivity), ofReal_div]
convert integral_cpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_Ioi (by rwa [ofReal_re] : 0 < (a : ℂ).re) hr
refine integral_ofReal.symm.trans <| setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi (fun t ht ↦ ?_)
norm_cast
simp_rw [← ofReal_cpow ht.le, RCLike.ofReal_mul, coe_algebraMap]
open Lean.Meta Qq Mathlib.Meta.Positivity in
/-- The `positivity` extension which identifies expressions of the form `Gamma a`. -/
@[positivity Gamma (_ : ℝ)]
def _root_.Mathlib.Meta.Positivity.evalGamma : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(Gamma $a) =>
match ← core q(inferInstance) q(inferInstance) a with
| .positive pa =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.positive q(Gamma_pos_of_pos $pa))
| .nonnegative pa =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.nonnegative q(Gamma_nonneg_of_nonneg $pa))
| _ => pure .none
| _, _, _ => throwError "failed to match on Gamma application"
/-- The Gamma function does not vanish on `ℝ` (except at non-positive integers, where the function
is mathematically undefined and we set it to `0` by convention). -/
theorem Gamma_ne_zero {s : ℝ} (hs : ∀ m : ℕ, s ≠ -m) : Gamma s ≠ 0 := by
suffices ∀ {n : ℕ}, -(n : ℝ) < s → Gamma s ≠ 0 by
apply this
swap
· exact ⌊-s⌋₊ + 1
rw [neg_lt, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one]
exact Nat.lt_floor_add_one _
intro n
induction n generalizing s with
| zero =>
intro hs
refine (Gamma_pos_of_pos ?_).ne'
rwa [Nat.cast_zero, neg_zero] at hs
| succ _ n_ih =>
intro hs'
have : Gamma (s + 1) ≠ 0 := by
apply n_ih
· intro m
specialize hs (1 + m)
contrapose! hs
rw [← eq_sub_iff_add_eq] at hs
rw [hs]
push_cast
ring
| · rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, neg_add] at hs'
linarith
rw [Gamma_add_one, mul_ne_zero_iff] at this
· exact this.2
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Gamma/Basic.lean | 524 | 527 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl, Damiano Testa,
Yuyang Zhao
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Ordering.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.MinMax
import Mathlib.Tactic.Contrapose
import Mathlib.Tactic.Use
/-!
# Ordered monoids
This file develops the basics of ordered monoids.
## Implementation details
Unfortunately, the number of `'` appended to lemmas in this file
may differ between the multiplicative and the additive version of a lemma.
The reason is that we did not want to change existing names in the library.
## Remark
Almost no monoid is actually present in this file: most assumptions have been generalized to
`Mul` or `MulOneClass`.
-/
-- TODO: If possible, uniformize lemma names, taking special care of `'`,
-- after the `ordered`-refactor is done.
open Function
section Nat
instance Nat.instMulLeftMono : MulLeftMono ℕ where
elim := fun _ _ _ h => mul_le_mul_left _ h
end Nat
section Int
instance Int.instAddLeftMono : AddLeftMono ℤ where
elim := fun _ _ _ h => Int.add_le_add_left h _
end Int
variable {α β : Type*}
section Mul
variable [Mul α]
section LE
variable [LE α]
/- The prime on this lemma is present only on the multiplicative version. The unprimed version
is taken by the analogous lemma for semiring, with an extra non-negativity assumption. -/
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) add_le_add_left]
theorem mul_le_mul_left' [MulLeftMono α] {b c : α} (bc : b ≤ c) (a : α) :
a * b ≤ a * c :=
CovariantClass.elim _ bc
@[to_additive le_of_add_le_add_left]
theorem le_of_mul_le_mul_left' [MulLeftReflectLE α] {a b c : α}
(bc : a * b ≤ a * c) :
b ≤ c :=
ContravariantClass.elim _ bc
/- The prime on this lemma is present only on the multiplicative version. The unprimed version
is taken by the analogous lemma for semiring, with an extra non-negativity assumption. -/
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) add_le_add_right]
theorem mul_le_mul_right' [i : MulRightMono α] {b c : α} (bc : b ≤ c)
(a : α) :
b * a ≤ c * a :=
i.elim a bc
@[to_additive le_of_add_le_add_right]
theorem le_of_mul_le_mul_right' [i : MulRightReflectLE α] {a b c : α}
(bc : b * a ≤ c * a) :
b ≤ c :=
i.elim a bc
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_le_mul_iff_left [MulLeftMono α]
[MulLeftReflectLE α] (a : α) {b c : α} :
a * b ≤ a * c ↔ b ≤ c :=
rel_iff_cov α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·) a
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_le_mul_iff_right [MulRightMono α]
[MulRightReflectLE α] (a : α) {b c : α} :
b * a ≤ c * a ↔ b ≤ c :=
rel_iff_cov α α (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·) a
end LE
section LT
variable [LT α]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_lt_mul_iff_left [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulLeftReflectLT α] (a : α) {b c : α} :
a * b < a * c ↔ b < c :=
rel_iff_cov α α (· * ·) (· < ·) a
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_lt_mul_iff_right [MulRightStrictMono α]
[MulRightReflectLT α] (a : α) {b c : α} :
b * a < c * a ↔ b < c :=
rel_iff_cov α α (swap (· * ·)) (· < ·) a
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) add_lt_add_left]
theorem mul_lt_mul_left' [MulLeftStrictMono α] {b c : α} (bc : b < c) (a : α) :
a * b < a * c :=
CovariantClass.elim _ bc
@[to_additive lt_of_add_lt_add_left]
theorem lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left' [MulLeftReflectLT α] {a b c : α}
(bc : a * b < a * c) :
b < c :=
ContravariantClass.elim _ bc
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) add_lt_add_right]
theorem mul_lt_mul_right' [i : MulRightStrictMono α] {b c : α} (bc : b < c)
(a : α) :
b * a < c * a :=
i.elim a bc
@[to_additive lt_of_add_lt_add_right]
theorem lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right' [i : MulRightReflectLT α] {a b c : α}
(bc : b * a < c * a) :
b < c :=
i.elim a bc
end LT
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_left_mono [MulLeftMono α] {a : α} : Monotone (a * ·) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ mul_le_mul_left' h _
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_right_mono [MulRightMono α] {a : α} : Monotone (· * a) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ mul_le_mul_right' h _
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_left_strictMono [MulLeftStrictMono α] {a : α} : StrictMono (a * ·) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ mul_lt_mul_left' h _
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_right_strictMono [MulRightStrictMono α] {a : α} : StrictMono (· * a) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ mul_lt_mul_right' h _
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr)]
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_lt [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulRightStrictMono α]
{a b c d : α} (h₁ : a < b) (h₂ : c < d) : a * c < b * d :=
calc
a * c < a * d := mul_lt_mul_left' h₂ a
_ < b * d := mul_lt_mul_right' h₁ d
alias add_lt_add := add_lt_add_of_lt_of_lt
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulRightMono α] {a b c d : α} (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : c < d) :
a * c < b * d :=
(mul_le_mul_right' h₁ _).trans_lt (mul_lt_mul_left' h₂ b)
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le [MulLeftMono α]
[MulRightStrictMono α] {a b c d : α} (h₁ : a < b) (h₂ : c ≤ d) :
a * c < b * d :=
(mul_le_mul_left' h₂ _).trans_lt (mul_lt_mul_right' h₁ d)
/-- Only assumes left strict covariance. -/
@[to_additive "Only assumes left strict covariance"]
theorem Left.mul_lt_mul [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulRightMono α] {a b c d : α} (h₁ : a < b) (h₂ : c < d) :
a * c < b * d :=
mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt h₁.le h₂
/-- Only assumes right strict covariance. -/
@[to_additive "Only assumes right strict covariance"]
theorem Right.mul_lt_mul [MulLeftMono α]
[MulRightStrictMono α] {a b c d : α}
(h₁ : a < b) (h₂ : c < d) :
a * c < b * d :=
mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le h₁ h₂.le
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) add_le_add]
theorem mul_le_mul' [MulLeftMono α] [MulRightMono α]
{a b c d : α} (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : c ≤ d) :
a * c ≤ b * d :=
(mul_le_mul_left' h₂ _).trans (mul_le_mul_right' h₁ d)
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_le_mul_three [MulLeftMono α]
[MulRightMono α] {a b c d e f : α} (h₁ : a ≤ d) (h₂ : b ≤ e)
(h₃ : c ≤ f) :
a * b * c ≤ d * e * f :=
mul_le_mul' (mul_le_mul' h₁ h₂) h₃
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_lt_of_mul_lt_left [MulLeftMono α] {a b c d : α} (h : a * b < c)
(hle : d ≤ b) :
a * d < c :=
(mul_le_mul_left' hle a).trans_lt h
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_le_of_mul_le_left [MulLeftMono α] {a b c d : α} (h : a * b ≤ c)
(hle : d ≤ b) :
a * d ≤ c :=
@act_rel_of_rel_of_act_rel _ _ _ (· ≤ ·) _ _ a _ _ _ hle h
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_lt_of_mul_lt_right [MulRightMono α] {a b c d : α}
(h : a * b < c) (hle : d ≤ a) :
d * b < c :=
(mul_le_mul_right' hle b).trans_lt h
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_le_of_mul_le_right [MulRightMono α] {a b c d : α}
(h : a * b ≤ c) (hle : d ≤ a) :
d * b ≤ c :=
(mul_le_mul_right' hle b).trans h
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_mul_of_lt_mul_left [MulLeftMono α] {a b c d : α} (h : a < b * c)
(hle : c ≤ d) :
a < b * d :=
h.trans_le (mul_le_mul_left' hle b)
@[to_additive]
theorem le_mul_of_le_mul_left [MulLeftMono α] {a b c d : α} (h : a ≤ b * c)
(hle : c ≤ d) :
a ≤ b * d :=
@rel_act_of_rel_of_rel_act _ _ _ (· ≤ ·) _ _ b _ _ _ hle h
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_mul_of_lt_mul_right [MulRightMono α] {a b c d : α}
(h : a < b * c) (hle : b ≤ d) :
a < d * c :=
h.trans_le (mul_le_mul_right' hle c)
@[to_additive]
theorem le_mul_of_le_mul_right [MulRightMono α] {a b c d : α}
(h : a ≤ b * c) (hle : b ≤ d) :
a ≤ d * c :=
h.trans (mul_le_mul_right' hle c)
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_left_cancel'' [MulLeftReflectLE α] {a b c : α} (h : a * b = a * c) :
b = c :=
(le_of_mul_le_mul_left' h.le).antisymm (le_of_mul_le_mul_left' h.ge)
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_right_cancel'' [MulRightReflectLE α] {a b c : α}
(h : a * b = c * b) :
a = c :=
(le_of_mul_le_mul_right' h.le).antisymm (le_of_mul_le_mul_right' h.ge)
@[to_additive] lemma mul_le_mul_iff_of_ge [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulRightStrictMono α] {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : α} (ha : a₁ ≤ a₂) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) :
a₂ * b₂ ≤ a₁ * b₁ ↔ a₁ = a₂ ∧ b₁ = b₂ := by
haveI := mulLeftMono_of_mulLeftStrictMono α
haveI := mulRightMono_of_mulRightStrictMono α
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, by rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩; rfl⟩
simp only [eq_iff_le_not_lt, ha, hb, true_and]
refine ⟨fun ha ↦ h.not_lt ?_, fun hb ↦ h.not_lt ?_⟩
exacts [mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le ha hb, mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt ha hb]
@[to_additive] theorem mul_eq_mul_iff_eq_and_eq [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulRightStrictMono α] {a b c d : α} (hac : a ≤ c) (hbd : b ≤ d) :
a * b = c * d ↔ a = c ∧ b = d := by
haveI := mulLeftMono_of_mulLeftStrictMono α
haveI := mulRightMono_of_mulRightStrictMono α
rw [le_antisymm_iff, eq_true (mul_le_mul' hac hbd), true_and, mul_le_mul_iff_of_ge hac hbd]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_left_inj_of_comparable [MulRightStrictMono α] {a b c : α} (h : b ≤ c ∨ c ≤ b) :
c * a = b * a ↔ c = b := by
refine ⟨fun h' => ?_, (· ▸ rfl)⟩
contrapose h'
obtain h | h := h
· exact mul_lt_mul_right' (h.lt_of_ne' h') a |>.ne'
· exact mul_lt_mul_right' (h.lt_of_ne h') a |>.ne
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_right_inj_of_comparable [MulLeftStrictMono α] {a b c : α} (h : b ≤ c ∨ c ≤ b) :
a * c = a * b ↔ c = b := by
refine ⟨fun h' => ?_, (· ▸ rfl)⟩
contrapose h'
obtain h | h := h
· exact mul_lt_mul_left' (h.lt_of_ne' h') a |>.ne'
· exact mul_lt_mul_left' (h.lt_of_ne h') a |>.ne
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] {a b c d : α}
@[to_additive]
theorem trichotomy_of_mul_eq_mul
[MulLeftStrictMono α] [MulRightStrictMono α]
(h : a * b = c * d) : (a = c ∧ b = d) ∨ a < c ∨ b < d := by
obtain hac | rfl | hca := lt_trichotomy a c
· right; left; exact hac
· left; simpa using mul_right_inj_of_comparable (LinearOrder.le_total d b)|>.1 h
· obtain hbd | rfl | hdb := lt_trichotomy b d
· right; right; exact hbd
· exact False.elim <| ne_of_lt (mul_lt_mul_right' hca b) h.symm
· exact False.elim <| ne_of_lt (mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_lt hca hdb) h.symm
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_max [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)] (a b c : α) :
a * max b c = max (a * b) (a * c) := mul_left_mono.map_max
@[to_additive]
lemma max_mul [CovariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·)] (a b c : α) :
max a b * c = max (a * c) (b * c) := mul_right_mono.map_max
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_min [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)] (a b c : α) :
a * min b c = min (a * b) (a * c) := mul_left_mono.map_min
@[to_additive]
lemma min_mul [CovariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·)] (a b c : α) :
min a b * c = min (a * c) (b * c) := mul_right_mono.map_min
@[to_additive] lemma min_lt_max_of_mul_lt_mul
[MulLeftMono α] [MulRightMono α]
(h : a * b < c * d) : min a b < max c d := by
simp_rw [min_lt_iff, lt_max_iff]; contrapose! h; exact mul_le_mul' h.1.1 h.2.2
@[to_additive] lemma Left.min_le_max_of_mul_le_mul
[MulLeftStrictMono α] [MulRightMono α]
(h : a * b ≤ c * d) : min a b ≤ max c d := by
simp_rw [min_le_iff, le_max_iff]; contrapose! h; exact mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt h.1.1.le h.2.2
@[to_additive] lemma Right.min_le_max_of_mul_le_mul
[MulLeftMono α] [MulRightStrictMono α]
(h : a * b ≤ c * d) : min a b ≤ max c d := by
simp_rw [min_le_iff, le_max_iff]; contrapose! h; exact mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le h.1.1 h.2.2.le
@[to_additive] lemma min_le_max_of_mul_le_mul
[MulLeftStrictMono α] [MulRightStrictMono α]
(h : a * b ≤ c * d) : min a b ≤ max c d :=
haveI := mulRightMono_of_mulRightStrictMono α
Left.min_le_max_of_mul_le_mul h
/-- Not an instance, to avoid loops with `IsLeftCancelMul.mulLeftStrictMono_of_mulLeftMono`. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem MulLeftStrictMono.toIsLeftCancelMul [MulLeftStrictMono α] : IsLeftCancelMul α where
mul_left_cancel _ _ _ h := mul_left_strictMono.injective h
/-- Not an instance, to avoid loops with `IsRightCancelMul.mulRightStrictMono_of_mulRightMono`. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem MulRightStrictMono.toIsRightCancelMul [MulRightStrictMono α] : IsRightCancelMul α where
mul_right_cancel _ _ _ h := mul_right_strictMono.injective h
end LinearOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] [MulLeftMono α] [MulRightMono α] {a b c d : α}
@[to_additive max_add_add_le_max_add_max]
theorem max_mul_mul_le_max_mul_max' : max (a * b) (c * d) ≤ max a c * max b d :=
max_le (mul_le_mul' (le_max_left _ _) <| le_max_left _ _) <|
mul_le_mul' (le_max_right _ _) <| le_max_right _ _
@[to_additive min_add_min_le_min_add_add]
theorem min_mul_min_le_min_mul_mul' : min a c * min b d ≤ min (a * b) (c * d) :=
le_min (mul_le_mul' (min_le_left _ _) <| min_le_left _ _) <|
mul_le_mul' (min_le_right _ _) <| min_le_right _ _
end LinearOrder
end Mul
-- using one
section MulOneClass
variable [MulOneClass α]
section LE
variable [LE α]
@[to_additive le_add_of_nonneg_right]
theorem le_mul_of_one_le_right' [MulLeftMono α] {a b : α} (h : 1 ≤ b) :
a ≤ a * b :=
calc
a = a * 1 := (mul_one a).symm
_ ≤ a * b := mul_le_mul_left' h a
@[to_additive add_le_of_nonpos_right]
theorem mul_le_of_le_one_right' [MulLeftMono α] {a b : α} (h : b ≤ 1) :
a * b ≤ a :=
calc
a * b ≤ a * 1 := mul_le_mul_left' h a
_ = a := mul_one a
@[to_additive le_add_of_nonneg_left]
theorem le_mul_of_one_le_left' [MulRightMono α] {a b : α} (h : 1 ≤ b) :
a ≤ b * a :=
calc
a = 1 * a := (one_mul a).symm
_ ≤ b * a := mul_le_mul_right' h a
@[to_additive add_le_of_nonpos_left]
theorem mul_le_of_le_one_left' [MulRightMono α] {a b : α} (h : b ≤ 1) :
b * a ≤ a :=
calc
b * a ≤ 1 * a := mul_le_mul_right' h a
_ = a := one_mul a
@[to_additive]
theorem one_le_of_le_mul_right [MulLeftReflectLE α] {a b : α} (h : a ≤ a * b) :
1 ≤ b :=
le_of_mul_le_mul_left' (a := a) <| by simpa only [mul_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem le_one_of_mul_le_right [MulLeftReflectLE α] {a b : α} (h : a * b ≤ a) :
b ≤ 1 :=
le_of_mul_le_mul_left' (a := a) <| by simpa only [mul_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem one_le_of_le_mul_left [MulRightReflectLE α] {a b : α}
(h : b ≤ a * b) :
1 ≤ a :=
le_of_mul_le_mul_right' (a := b) <| by simpa only [one_mul]
@[to_additive]
theorem le_one_of_mul_le_left [MulRightReflectLE α] {a b : α}
(h : a * b ≤ b) :
a ≤ 1 :=
le_of_mul_le_mul_right' (a := b) <| by simpa only [one_mul]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) le_add_iff_nonneg_right]
theorem le_mul_iff_one_le_right' [MulLeftMono α]
[MulLeftReflectLE α] (a : α) {b : α} :
a ≤ a * b ↔ 1 ≤ b :=
Iff.trans (by rw [mul_one]) (mul_le_mul_iff_left a)
@[to_additive (attr := simp) le_add_iff_nonneg_left]
theorem le_mul_iff_one_le_left' [MulRightMono α]
[MulRightReflectLE α] (a : α) {b : α} :
a ≤ b * a ↔ 1 ≤ b :=
Iff.trans (by rw [one_mul]) (mul_le_mul_iff_right a)
@[to_additive (attr := simp) add_le_iff_nonpos_right]
theorem mul_le_iff_le_one_right' [MulLeftMono α]
[MulLeftReflectLE α] (a : α) {b : α} :
a * b ≤ a ↔ b ≤ 1 :=
Iff.trans (by rw [mul_one]) (mul_le_mul_iff_left a)
@[to_additive (attr := simp) add_le_iff_nonpos_left]
theorem mul_le_iff_le_one_left' [MulRightMono α]
[MulRightReflectLE α] {a b : α} :
a * b ≤ b ↔ a ≤ 1 :=
Iff.trans (by rw [one_mul]) (mul_le_mul_iff_right b)
end LE
section LT
variable [LT α]
@[to_additive lt_add_of_pos_right]
theorem lt_mul_of_one_lt_right' [MulLeftStrictMono α] (a : α) {b : α} (h : 1 < b) :
a < a * b :=
calc
a = a * 1 := (mul_one a).symm
_ < a * b := mul_lt_mul_left' h a
@[to_additive add_lt_of_neg_right]
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_one_right' [MulLeftStrictMono α] (a : α) {b : α} (h : b < 1) :
a * b < a :=
calc
a * b < a * 1 := mul_lt_mul_left' h a
_ = a := mul_one a
@[to_additive lt_add_of_pos_left]
theorem lt_mul_of_one_lt_left' [MulRightStrictMono α] (a : α) {b : α}
(h : 1 < b) :
a < b * a :=
calc
a = 1 * a := (one_mul a).symm
_ < b * a := mul_lt_mul_right' h a
@[to_additive add_lt_of_neg_left]
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_one_left' [MulRightStrictMono α] (a : α) {b : α}
(h : b < 1) :
b * a < a :=
calc
b * a < 1 * a := mul_lt_mul_right' h a
_ = a := one_mul a
@[to_additive]
theorem one_lt_of_lt_mul_right [MulLeftReflectLT α] {a b : α} (h : a < a * b) :
1 < b :=
lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left' (a := a) <| by simpa only [mul_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_one_of_mul_lt_right [MulLeftReflectLT α] {a b : α} (h : a * b < a) :
b < 1 :=
lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left' (a := a) <| by simpa only [mul_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem one_lt_of_lt_mul_left [MulRightReflectLT α] {a b : α}
(h : b < a * b) :
1 < a :=
lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right' (a := b) <| by simpa only [one_mul]
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_one_of_mul_lt_left [MulRightReflectLT α] {a b : α}
(h : a * b < b) :
a < 1 :=
lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right' (a := b) <| by simpa only [one_mul]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) lt_add_iff_pos_right]
theorem lt_mul_iff_one_lt_right' [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulLeftReflectLT α] (a : α) {b : α} :
a < a * b ↔ 1 < b :=
Iff.trans (by rw [mul_one]) (mul_lt_mul_iff_left a)
@[to_additive (attr := simp) lt_add_iff_pos_left]
theorem lt_mul_iff_one_lt_left' [MulRightStrictMono α]
[MulRightReflectLT α] (a : α) {b : α} : a < b * a ↔ 1 < b :=
Iff.trans (by rw [one_mul]) (mul_lt_mul_iff_right a)
@[to_additive (attr := simp) add_lt_iff_neg_left]
theorem mul_lt_iff_lt_one_left' [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulLeftReflectLT α] {a b : α} :
a * b < a ↔ b < 1 :=
Iff.trans (by rw [mul_one]) (mul_lt_mul_iff_left a)
@[to_additive (attr := simp) add_lt_iff_neg_right]
theorem mul_lt_iff_lt_one_right' [MulRightStrictMono α]
[MulRightReflectLT α] {a : α} (b : α) : a * b < b ↔ a < 1 :=
Iff.trans (by rw [one_mul]) (mul_lt_mul_iff_right b)
end LT
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
/-! Lemmas of the form `b ≤ c → a ≤ 1 → b * a ≤ c`,
which assume left covariance. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_le_of_le_of_le_one [MulLeftMono α] {a b c : α} (hbc : b ≤ c)
(ha : a ≤ 1) :
b * a ≤ c :=
calc
b * a ≤ b * 1 := mul_le_mul_left' ha b
_ = b := mul_one b
_ ≤ c := hbc
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_lt_of_le_of_lt_one [MulLeftStrictMono α] {a b c : α} (hbc : b ≤ c)
(ha : a < 1) :
b * a < c :=
calc
b * a < b * 1 := mul_lt_mul_left' ha b
_ = b := mul_one b
_ ≤ c := hbc
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_of_le_one [MulLeftMono α] {a b c : α} (hbc : b < c)
(ha : a ≤ 1) :
b * a < c :=
calc
b * a ≤ b * 1 := mul_le_mul_left' ha b
_ = b := mul_one b
_ < c := hbc
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_of_lt_one [MulLeftStrictMono α] {a b c : α} (hbc : b < c)
(ha : a < 1) :
b * a < c :=
calc
b * a < b * 1 := mul_lt_mul_left' ha b
_ = b := mul_one b
_ < c := hbc
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_of_lt_one' [MulLeftMono α] {a b c : α} (hbc : b < c)
(ha : a < 1) :
b * a < c :=
mul_lt_of_lt_of_le_one hbc ha.le
/-- Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.mul_le_one`. -/
@[to_additive "Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.add_nonpos`."]
theorem Left.mul_le_one [MulLeftMono α] {a b : α} (ha : a ≤ 1) (hb : b ≤ 1) :
a * b ≤ 1 :=
mul_le_of_le_of_le_one ha hb
/-- Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.mul_lt_one_of_le_of_lt`. -/
@[to_additive Left.add_neg_of_nonpos_of_neg
"Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.add_neg_of_nonpos_of_neg`."]
theorem Left.mul_lt_one_of_le_of_lt [MulLeftStrictMono α] {a b : α} (ha : a ≤ 1)
(hb : b < 1) :
a * b < 1 :=
mul_lt_of_le_of_lt_one ha hb
/-- Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.mul_lt_one_of_lt_of_le`. -/
@[to_additive Left.add_neg_of_neg_of_nonpos
"Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.add_neg_of_neg_of_nonpos`."]
theorem Left.mul_lt_one_of_lt_of_le [MulLeftMono α] {a b : α} (ha : a < 1)
(hb : b ≤ 1) :
a * b < 1 :=
mul_lt_of_lt_of_le_one ha hb
/-- Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.mul_lt_one`. -/
@[to_additive "Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.add_neg`."]
theorem Left.mul_lt_one [MulLeftStrictMono α] {a b : α} (ha : a < 1) (hb : b < 1) :
a * b < 1 :=
mul_lt_of_lt_of_lt_one ha hb
/-- Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.mul_lt_one'`. -/
@[to_additive "Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.add_neg'`."]
theorem Left.mul_lt_one' [MulLeftMono α] {a b : α} (ha : a < 1) (hb : b < 1) :
a * b < 1 :=
mul_lt_of_lt_of_lt_one' ha hb
/-! Lemmas of the form `b ≤ c → 1 ≤ a → b ≤ c * a`,
which assume left covariance. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem le_mul_of_le_of_one_le [MulLeftMono α] {a b c : α} (hbc : b ≤ c)
(ha : 1 ≤ a) :
b ≤ c * a :=
calc
b ≤ c := hbc
_ = c * 1 := (mul_one c).symm
_ ≤ c * a := mul_le_mul_left' ha c
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_mul_of_le_of_one_lt [MulLeftStrictMono α] {a b c : α} (hbc : b ≤ c)
(ha : 1 < a) :
b < c * a :=
calc
b ≤ c := hbc
_ = c * 1 := (mul_one c).symm
_ < c * a := mul_lt_mul_left' ha c
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_mul_of_lt_of_one_le [MulLeftMono α] {a b c : α} (hbc : b < c)
(ha : 1 ≤ a) :
b < c * a :=
calc
b < c := hbc
_ = c * 1 := (mul_one c).symm
_ ≤ c * a := mul_le_mul_left' ha c
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_mul_of_lt_of_one_lt [MulLeftStrictMono α] {a b c : α} (hbc : b < c)
(ha : 1 < a) :
b < c * a :=
calc
b < c := hbc
_ = c * 1 := (mul_one c).symm
_ < c * a := mul_lt_mul_left' ha c
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_mul_of_lt_of_one_lt' [MulLeftMono α] {a b c : α} (hbc : b < c)
(ha : 1 < a) :
b < c * a :=
lt_mul_of_lt_of_one_le hbc ha.le
/-- Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.one_le_mul`. -/
@[to_additive Left.add_nonneg "Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.add_nonneg`."]
theorem Left.one_le_mul [MulLeftMono α] {a b : α} (ha : 1 ≤ a) (hb : 1 ≤ b) :
1 ≤ a * b :=
le_mul_of_le_of_one_le ha hb
/-- Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.one_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt`. -/
@[to_additive Left.add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos
"Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos`."]
theorem Left.one_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt [MulLeftStrictMono α] {a b : α} (ha : 1 ≤ a)
(hb : 1 < b) :
1 < a * b :=
lt_mul_of_le_of_one_lt ha hb
/-- Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.one_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le`. -/
@[to_additive Left.add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg
"Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg`."]
theorem Left.one_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le [MulLeftMono α] {a b : α} (ha : 1 < a)
(hb : 1 ≤ b) :
1 < a * b :=
lt_mul_of_lt_of_one_le ha hb
/-- Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.one_lt_mul`. -/
@[to_additive Left.add_pos "Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.add_pos`."]
theorem Left.one_lt_mul [MulLeftStrictMono α] {a b : α} (ha : 1 < a) (hb : 1 < b) :
1 < a * b :=
lt_mul_of_lt_of_one_lt ha hb
/-- Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.one_lt_mul'`. -/
@[to_additive Left.add_pos' "Assumes left covariance.
The lemma assuming right covariance is `Right.add_pos'`."]
theorem Left.one_lt_mul' [MulLeftMono α] {a b : α} (ha : 1 < a) (hb : 1 < b) :
1 < a * b :=
lt_mul_of_lt_of_one_lt' ha hb
/-! Lemmas of the form `a ≤ 1 → b ≤ c → a * b ≤ c`,
which assume right covariance. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_le_of_le_one_of_le [MulRightMono α] {a b c : α} (ha : a ≤ 1)
(hbc : b ≤ c) :
a * b ≤ c :=
calc
a * b ≤ 1 * b := mul_le_mul_right' ha b
_ = b := one_mul b
_ ≤ c := hbc
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_one_of_le [MulRightStrictMono α] {a b c : α} (ha : a < 1)
(hbc : b ≤ c) :
a * b < c :=
calc
a * b < 1 * b := mul_lt_mul_right' ha b
_ = b := one_mul b
_ ≤ c := hbc
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_lt_of_le_one_of_lt [MulRightMono α] {a b c : α} (ha : a ≤ 1)
(hb : b < c) :
a * b < c :=
calc
a * b ≤ 1 * b := mul_le_mul_right' ha b
_ = b := one_mul b
_ < c := hb
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_one_of_lt [MulRightStrictMono α] {a b c : α} (ha : a < 1)
(hb : b < c) :
a * b < c :=
calc
a * b < 1 * b := mul_lt_mul_right' ha b
_ = b := one_mul b
_ < c := hb
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_one_of_lt' [MulRightMono α] {a b c : α} (ha : a < 1)
(hbc : b < c) :
a * b < c :=
mul_lt_of_le_one_of_lt ha.le hbc
/-- Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.mul_le_one`. -/
@[to_additive "Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.add_nonpos`."]
theorem Right.mul_le_one [MulRightMono α] {a b : α} (ha : a ≤ 1)
(hb : b ≤ 1) :
a * b ≤ 1 :=
mul_le_of_le_one_of_le ha hb
/-- Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.mul_lt_one_of_lt_of_le`. -/
@[to_additive Right.add_neg_of_neg_of_nonpos
"Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.add_neg_of_neg_of_nonpos`."]
theorem Right.mul_lt_one_of_lt_of_le [MulRightStrictMono α] {a b : α}
(ha : a < 1) (hb : b ≤ 1) :
a * b < 1 :=
mul_lt_of_lt_one_of_le ha hb
/-- Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.mul_lt_one_of_le_of_lt`. -/
@[to_additive Right.add_neg_of_nonpos_of_neg
"Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.add_neg_of_nonpos_of_neg`."]
theorem Right.mul_lt_one_of_le_of_lt [MulRightMono α] {a b : α}
(ha : a ≤ 1) (hb : b < 1) :
a * b < 1 :=
mul_lt_of_le_one_of_lt ha hb
/-- Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.mul_lt_one`. -/
@[to_additive "Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.add_neg`."]
theorem Right.mul_lt_one [MulRightStrictMono α] {a b : α} (ha : a < 1)
(hb : b < 1) :
a * b < 1 :=
mul_lt_of_lt_one_of_lt ha hb
/-- Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.mul_lt_one'`. -/
@[to_additive "Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.add_neg'`."]
theorem Right.mul_lt_one' [MulRightMono α] {a b : α} (ha : a < 1)
(hb : b < 1) :
a * b < 1 :=
mul_lt_of_lt_one_of_lt' ha hb
/-! Lemmas of the form `1 ≤ a → b ≤ c → b ≤ a * c`,
which assume right covariance. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem le_mul_of_one_le_of_le [MulRightMono α] {a b c : α} (ha : 1 ≤ a)
(hbc : b ≤ c) :
b ≤ a * c :=
calc
b ≤ c := hbc
_ = 1 * c := (one_mul c).symm
_ ≤ a * c := mul_le_mul_right' ha c
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_mul_of_one_lt_of_le [MulRightStrictMono α] {a b c : α} (ha : 1 < a)
(hbc : b ≤ c) :
b < a * c :=
calc
b ≤ c := hbc
_ = 1 * c := (one_mul c).symm
_ < a * c := mul_lt_mul_right' ha c
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_mul_of_one_le_of_lt [MulRightMono α] {a b c : α} (ha : 1 ≤ a)
(hbc : b < c) :
b < a * c :=
calc
b < c := hbc
_ = 1 * c := (one_mul c).symm
_ ≤ a * c := mul_le_mul_right' ha c
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_mul_of_one_lt_of_lt [MulRightStrictMono α] {a b c : α} (ha : 1 < a)
(hbc : b < c) :
b < a * c :=
calc
b < c := hbc
_ = 1 * c := (one_mul c).symm
_ < a * c := mul_lt_mul_right' ha c
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_mul_of_one_lt_of_lt' [MulRightMono α] {a b c : α} (ha : 1 < a)
(hbc : b < c) :
b < a * c :=
lt_mul_of_one_le_of_lt ha.le hbc
/-- Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.one_le_mul`. -/
@[to_additive Right.add_nonneg "Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.add_nonneg`."]
theorem Right.one_le_mul [MulRightMono α] {a b : α} (ha : 1 ≤ a)
(hb : 1 ≤ b) :
1 ≤ a * b :=
le_mul_of_one_le_of_le ha hb
/-- Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.one_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le`. -/
@[to_additive Right.add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg
"Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg`."]
theorem Right.one_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le [MulRightStrictMono α] {a b : α}
(ha : 1 < a) (hb : 1 ≤ b) :
1 < a * b :=
lt_mul_of_one_lt_of_le ha hb
/-- Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.one_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt`. -/
@[to_additive Right.add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos
"Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos`."]
theorem Right.one_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt [MulRightMono α] {a b : α}
(ha : 1 ≤ a) (hb : 1 < b) :
1 < a * b :=
lt_mul_of_one_le_of_lt ha hb
/-- Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.one_lt_mul`. -/
@[to_additive Right.add_pos "Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.add_pos`."]
theorem Right.one_lt_mul [MulRightStrictMono α] {a b : α} (ha : 1 < a)
(hb : 1 < b) :
1 < a * b :=
lt_mul_of_one_lt_of_lt ha hb
/-- Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.one_lt_mul'`. -/
@[to_additive Right.add_pos' "Assumes right covariance.
The lemma assuming left covariance is `Left.add_pos'`."]
theorem Right.one_lt_mul' [MulRightMono α] {a b : α} (ha : 1 < a)
(hb : 1 < b) :
1 < a * b :=
lt_mul_of_one_lt_of_lt' ha hb
alias mul_le_one' := Left.mul_le_one
alias mul_lt_one_of_le_of_lt := Left.mul_lt_one_of_le_of_lt
alias mul_lt_one_of_lt_of_le := Left.mul_lt_one_of_lt_of_le
alias mul_lt_one := Left.mul_lt_one
alias mul_lt_one' := Left.mul_lt_one'
attribute [to_additive add_nonpos "**Alias** of `Left.add_nonpos`."] mul_le_one'
attribute [to_additive add_neg_of_nonpos_of_neg "**Alias** of `Left.add_neg_of_nonpos_of_neg`."]
mul_lt_one_of_le_of_lt
attribute [to_additive add_neg_of_neg_of_nonpos "**Alias** of `Left.add_neg_of_neg_of_nonpos`."]
mul_lt_one_of_lt_of_le
attribute [to_additive "**Alias** of `Left.add_neg`."] mul_lt_one
attribute [to_additive "**Alias** of `Left.add_neg'`."] mul_lt_one'
alias one_le_mul := Left.one_le_mul
alias one_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt' := Left.one_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt
alias one_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le' := Left.one_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le
alias one_lt_mul' := Left.one_lt_mul
alias one_lt_mul'' := Left.one_lt_mul'
attribute [to_additive add_nonneg "**Alias** of `Left.add_nonneg`."] one_le_mul
attribute [to_additive add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos "**Alias** of `Left.add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos`."]
one_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt'
attribute [to_additive add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg "**Alias** of `Left.add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg`."]
one_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le'
attribute [to_additive add_pos "**Alias** of `Left.add_pos`."] one_lt_mul'
attribute [to_additive add_pos' "**Alias** of `Left.add_pos'`."] one_lt_mul''
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_of_mul_lt_of_one_le_left [MulLeftMono α] {a b c : α} (h : a * b < c)
(hle : 1 ≤ b) :
a < c :=
(le_mul_of_one_le_right' hle).trans_lt h
@[to_additive]
theorem le_of_mul_le_of_one_le_left [MulLeftMono α] {a b c : α} (h : a * b ≤ c)
(hle : 1 ≤ b) :
a ≤ c :=
(le_mul_of_one_le_right' hle).trans h
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_of_lt_mul_of_le_one_left [MulLeftMono α] {a b c : α} (h : a < b * c)
(hle : c ≤ 1) :
a < b :=
h.trans_le (mul_le_of_le_one_right' hle)
@[to_additive]
theorem le_of_le_mul_of_le_one_left [MulLeftMono α] {a b c : α} (h : a ≤ b * c)
(hle : c ≤ 1) :
a ≤ b :=
h.trans (mul_le_of_le_one_right' hle)
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_of_mul_lt_of_one_le_right [MulRightMono α] {a b c : α}
(h : a * b < c) (hle : 1 ≤ a) :
b < c :=
(le_mul_of_one_le_left' hle).trans_lt h
@[to_additive]
theorem le_of_mul_le_of_one_le_right [MulRightMono α] {a b c : α}
(h : a * b ≤ c) (hle : 1 ≤ a) :
b ≤ c :=
(le_mul_of_one_le_left' hle).trans h
@[to_additive]
theorem lt_of_lt_mul_of_le_one_right [MulRightMono α] {a b c : α}
(h : a < b * c) (hle : b ≤ 1) :
a < c :=
h.trans_le (mul_le_of_le_one_left' hle)
@[to_additive]
theorem le_of_le_mul_of_le_one_right [MulRightMono α] {a b c : α}
(h : a ≤ b * c) (hle : b ≤ 1) :
a ≤ c :=
h.trans (mul_le_of_le_one_left' hle)
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_eq_one_iff_of_one_le [MulLeftMono α]
[MulRightMono α] {a b : α} (ha : 1 ≤ a) (hb : 1 ≤ b) :
a * b = 1 ↔ a = 1 ∧ b = 1 :=
Iff.intro
(fun hab : a * b = 1 =>
have : a ≤ 1 := hab ▸ le_mul_of_le_of_one_le le_rfl hb
have : a = 1 := le_antisymm this ha
have : b ≤ 1 := hab ▸ le_mul_of_one_le_of_le ha le_rfl
have : b = 1 := le_antisymm this hb
And.intro ‹a = 1› ‹b = 1›)
(by rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩; rw [mul_one])
section Left
variable [MulLeftMono α] {a b : α}
@[to_additive eq_zero_of_add_nonneg_left]
theorem eq_one_of_one_le_mul_left (ha : a ≤ 1) (hb : b ≤ 1) (hab : 1 ≤ a * b) : a = 1 :=
ha.eq_of_not_lt fun h => hab.not_lt <| mul_lt_one_of_lt_of_le h hb
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_of_mul_le_one_left (ha : 1 ≤ a) (hb : 1 ≤ b) (hab : a * b ≤ 1) : a = 1 :=
ha.eq_of_not_gt fun h => hab.not_lt <| one_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le' h hb
end Left
section Right
variable [MulRightMono α] {a b : α}
@[to_additive eq_zero_of_add_nonneg_right]
theorem eq_one_of_one_le_mul_right (ha : a ≤ 1) (hb : b ≤ 1) (hab : 1 ≤ a * b) : b = 1 :=
hb.eq_of_not_lt fun h => hab.not_lt <| Right.mul_lt_one_of_le_of_lt ha h
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_of_mul_le_one_right (ha : 1 ≤ a) (hb : 1 ≤ b) (hab : a * b ≤ 1) : b = 1 :=
hb.eq_of_not_gt fun h => hab.not_lt <| Right.one_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt ha h
end Right
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α]
theorem exists_square_le [MulLeftStrictMono α] (a : α) : ∃ b : α, b * b ≤ a := by
by_cases h : a < 1
· use a
have : a * a < a * 1 := mul_lt_mul_left' h a
rw [mul_one] at this
exact le_of_lt this
· use 1
push_neg at h
rwa [mul_one]
end LinearOrder
end MulOneClass
section Semigroup
variable [Semigroup α]
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α]
/- This is not instance, since we want to have an instance from `LeftCancelSemigroup`s
to the appropriate covariant class. -/
/-- A semigroup with a partial order and satisfying `LeftCancelSemigroup`
(i.e. `a * c < b * c → a < b`) is a `LeftCancelSemigroup`. -/
@[to_additive
"An additive semigroup with a partial order and satisfying `AddLeftCancelSemigroup`
(i.e. `c + a < c + b → a < b`) is a `AddLeftCancelSemigroup`."]
def Contravariant.toLeftCancelSemigroup [MulLeftReflectLE α] :
LeftCancelSemigroup α :=
{ ‹Semigroup α› with mul_left_cancel := fun _ _ _ => mul_left_cancel'' }
/- This is not instance, since we want to have an instance from `RightCancelSemigroup`s
to the appropriate covariant class. -/
/-- A semigroup with a partial order and satisfying `RightCancelSemigroup`
(i.e. `a * c < b * c → a < b`) is a `RightCancelSemigroup`. -/
@[to_additive
"An additive semigroup with a partial order and satisfying `AddRightCancelSemigroup`
(`a + c < b + c → a < b`) is a `AddRightCancelSemigroup`."]
def Contravariant.toRightCancelSemigroup [MulRightReflectLE α] :
RightCancelSemigroup α :=
{ ‹Semigroup α› with mul_right_cancel := fun _ _ _ => mul_right_cancel'' }
end PartialOrder
end Semigroup
section Mono
variable [Mul α] [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {f g : β → α} {s : Set β}
@[to_additive const_add]
theorem Monotone.const_mul' [MulLeftMono α] (hf : Monotone f) (a : α) : Monotone fun x ↦ a * f x :=
mul_left_mono.comp hf
@[to_additive const_add]
theorem MonotoneOn.const_mul' [MulLeftMono α] (hf : MonotoneOn f s) (a : α) :
MonotoneOn (fun x => a * f x) s := mul_left_mono.comp_monotoneOn hf
@[to_additive const_add]
theorem Antitone.const_mul' [MulLeftMono α] (hf : Antitone f) (a : α) : Antitone fun x ↦ a * f x :=
mul_left_mono.comp_antitone hf
@[to_additive const_add]
theorem AntitoneOn.const_mul' [MulLeftMono α] (hf : AntitoneOn f s) (a : α) :
AntitoneOn (fun x => a * f x) s := mul_left_mono.comp_antitoneOn hf
@[to_additive add_const]
theorem Monotone.mul_const' [MulRightMono α] (hf : Monotone f) (a : α) :
Monotone fun x => f x * a := mul_right_mono.comp hf
@[to_additive add_const]
theorem MonotoneOn.mul_const' [MulRightMono α] (hf : MonotoneOn f s) (a : α) :
MonotoneOn (fun x => f x * a) s := mul_right_mono.comp_monotoneOn hf
@[to_additive add_const]
theorem Antitone.mul_const' [MulRightMono α] (hf : Antitone f) (a : α) : Antitone fun x ↦ f x * a :=
mul_right_mono.comp_antitone hf
@[to_additive add_const]
theorem AntitoneOn.mul_const' [MulRightMono α] (hf : AntitoneOn f s) (a : α) :
AntitoneOn (fun x => f x * a) s := mul_right_mono.comp_antitoneOn hf
/-- The product of two monotone functions is monotone. -/
@[to_additive add "The sum of two monotone functions is monotone."]
theorem Monotone.mul' [MulLeftMono α]
[MulRightMono α] (hf : Monotone f) (hg : Monotone g) :
Monotone fun x => f x * g x := fun _ _ h => mul_le_mul' (hf h) (hg h)
/-- The product of two monotone functions is monotone. -/
@[to_additive add "The sum of two monotone functions is monotone."]
theorem MonotoneOn.mul' [MulLeftMono α]
[MulRightMono α] (hf : MonotoneOn f s) (hg : MonotoneOn g s) :
MonotoneOn (fun x => f x * g x) s := fun _ hx _ hy h =>
mul_le_mul' (hf hx hy h) (hg hx hy h)
/-- The product of two antitone functions is antitone. -/
@[to_additive add "The sum of two antitone functions is antitone."]
theorem Antitone.mul' [MulLeftMono α]
[MulRightMono α] (hf : Antitone f) (hg : Antitone g) :
Antitone fun x => f x * g x := fun _ _ h => mul_le_mul' (hf h) (hg h)
/-- The product of two antitone functions is antitone. -/
@[to_additive add "The sum of two antitone functions is antitone."]
theorem AntitoneOn.mul' [MulLeftMono α]
[MulRightMono α] (hf : AntitoneOn f s) (hg : AntitoneOn g s) :
AntitoneOn (fun x => f x * g x) s :=
fun _ hx _ hy h => mul_le_mul' (hf hx hy h) (hg hx hy h)
section Left
variable [MulLeftStrictMono α]
@[to_additive const_add]
theorem StrictMono.const_mul' (hf : StrictMono f) (c : α) : StrictMono fun x => c * f x :=
fun _ _ ab => mul_lt_mul_left' (hf ab) c
@[to_additive const_add]
theorem StrictMonoOn.const_mul' (hf : StrictMonoOn f s) (c : α) :
StrictMonoOn (fun x => c * f x) s :=
fun _ ha _ hb ab => mul_lt_mul_left' (hf ha hb ab) c
@[to_additive const_add]
theorem StrictAnti.const_mul' (hf : StrictAnti f) (c : α) : StrictAnti fun x => c * f x :=
fun _ _ ab => mul_lt_mul_left' (hf ab) c
@[to_additive const_add]
theorem StrictAntiOn.const_mul' (hf : StrictAntiOn f s) (c : α) :
StrictAntiOn (fun x => c * f x) s :=
fun _ ha _ hb ab => mul_lt_mul_left' (hf ha hb ab) c
end Left
section Right
variable [MulRightStrictMono α]
@[to_additive add_const]
theorem StrictMono.mul_const' (hf : StrictMono f) (c : α) : StrictMono fun x => f x * c :=
fun _ _ ab => mul_lt_mul_right' (hf ab) c
@[to_additive add_const]
theorem StrictMonoOn.mul_const' (hf : StrictMonoOn f s) (c : α) :
StrictMonoOn (fun x => f x * c) s :=
fun _ ha _ hb ab => mul_lt_mul_right' (hf ha hb ab) c
@[to_additive add_const]
theorem StrictAnti.mul_const' (hf : StrictAnti f) (c : α) : StrictAnti fun x => f x * c :=
fun _ _ ab => mul_lt_mul_right' (hf ab) c
@[to_additive add_const]
theorem StrictAntiOn.mul_const' (hf : StrictAntiOn f s) (c : α) :
StrictAntiOn (fun x => f x * c) s :=
fun _ ha _ hb ab => mul_lt_mul_right' (hf ha hb ab) c
end Right
/-- The product of two strictly monotone functions is strictly monotone. -/
@[to_additive add "The sum of two strictly monotone functions is strictly monotone."]
theorem StrictMono.mul' [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulRightStrictMono α] (hf : StrictMono f) (hg : StrictMono g) :
StrictMono fun x => f x * g x := fun _ _ ab =>
mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_lt (hf ab) (hg ab)
/-- The product of two strictly monotone functions is strictly monotone. -/
@[to_additive add "The sum of two strictly monotone functions is strictly monotone."]
theorem StrictMonoOn.mul' [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulRightStrictMono α] (hf : StrictMonoOn f s) (hg : StrictMonoOn g s) :
StrictMonoOn (fun x => f x * g x) s :=
fun _ ha _ hb ab => mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_lt (hf ha hb ab) (hg ha hb ab)
/-- The product of two strictly antitone functions is strictly antitone. -/
@[to_additive add "The sum of two strictly antitone functions is strictly antitone."]
theorem StrictAnti.mul' [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulRightStrictMono α] (hf : StrictAnti f) (hg : StrictAnti g) :
StrictAnti fun x => f x * g x :=
fun _ _ ab => mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_lt (hf ab) (hg ab)
/-- The product of two strictly antitone functions is strictly antitone. -/
@[to_additive add "The sum of two strictly antitone functions is strictly antitone."]
theorem StrictAntiOn.mul' [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulRightStrictMono α] (hf : StrictAntiOn f s) (hg : StrictAntiOn g s) :
StrictAntiOn (fun x => f x * g x) s :=
fun _ ha _ hb ab => mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_lt (hf ha hb ab) (hg ha hb ab)
/-- The product of a monotone function and a strictly monotone function is strictly monotone. -/
@[to_additive add_strictMono "The sum of a monotone function and a strictly monotone function is
strictly monotone."]
theorem Monotone.mul_strictMono' [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulRightMono α] {f g : β → α} (hf : Monotone f)
(hg : StrictMono g) :
StrictMono fun x => f x * g x :=
fun _ _ h => mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt (hf h.le) (hg h)
/-- The product of a monotone function and a strictly monotone function is strictly monotone. -/
@[to_additive add_strictMono "The sum of a monotone function and a strictly monotone function is
strictly monotone."]
theorem MonotoneOn.mul_strictMono' [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulRightMono α] {f g : β → α} (hf : MonotoneOn f s)
(hg : StrictMonoOn g s) : StrictMonoOn (fun x => f x * g x) s :=
fun _ hx _ hy h => mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt (hf hx hy h.le) (hg hx hy h)
/-- The product of an antitone function and a strictly antitone function is strictly antitone. -/
@[to_additive add_strictAnti "The sum of an antitone function and a strictly antitone function is
strictly antitone."]
theorem Antitone.mul_strictAnti' [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulRightMono α] {f g : β → α} (hf : Antitone f)
(hg : StrictAnti g) :
StrictAnti fun x => f x * g x :=
fun _ _ h => mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt (hf h.le) (hg h)
/-- The product of an antitone function and a strictly antitone function is strictly antitone. -/
@[to_additive add_strictAnti "The sum of an antitone function and a strictly antitone function is
strictly antitone."]
theorem AntitoneOn.mul_strictAnti' [MulLeftStrictMono α]
[MulRightMono α] {f g : β → α} (hf : AntitoneOn f s)
(hg : StrictAntiOn g s) :
StrictAntiOn (fun x => f x * g x) s :=
fun _ hx _ hy h => mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt (hf hx hy h.le) (hg hx hy h)
variable [MulLeftMono α] [MulRightStrictMono α]
/-- The product of a strictly monotone function and a monotone function is strictly monotone. -/
@[to_additive add_monotone "The sum of a strictly monotone function and a monotone function is
strictly monotone."]
theorem StrictMono.mul_monotone' (hf : StrictMono f) (hg : Monotone g) :
StrictMono fun x => f x * g x :=
fun _ _ h => mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le (hf h) (hg h.le)
/-- The product of a strictly monotone function and a monotone function is strictly monotone. -/
@[to_additive add_monotone "The sum of a strictly monotone function and a monotone function is
strictly monotone."]
theorem StrictMonoOn.mul_monotone' (hf : StrictMonoOn f s) (hg : MonotoneOn g s) :
StrictMonoOn (fun x => f x * g x) s :=
fun _ hx _ hy h => mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le (hf hx hy h) (hg hx hy h.le)
/-- The product of a strictly antitone function and an antitone function is strictly antitone. -/
@[to_additive add_antitone "The sum of a strictly antitone function and an antitone function is
strictly antitone."]
theorem StrictAnti.mul_antitone' (hf : StrictAnti f) (hg : Antitone g) :
StrictAnti fun x => f x * g x :=
fun _ _ h => mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le (hf h) (hg h.le)
/-- The product of a strictly antitone function and an antitone function is strictly antitone. -/
@[to_additive add_antitone "The sum of a strictly antitone function and an antitone function is
strictly antitone."]
theorem StrictAntiOn.mul_antitone' (hf : StrictAntiOn f s) (hg : AntitoneOn g s) :
StrictAntiOn (fun x => f x * g x) s :=
fun _ hx _ hy h => mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le (hf hx hy h) (hg hx hy h.le)
@[to_additive (attr := simp) cmp_add_left]
theorem cmp_mul_left' {α : Type*} [Mul α] [LinearOrder α] [MulLeftStrictMono α]
(a b c : α) :
cmp (a * b) (a * c) = cmp b c :=
(strictMono_id.const_mul' a).cmp_map_eq b c
@[to_additive (attr := simp) cmp_add_right]
theorem cmp_mul_right' {α : Type*} [Mul α] [LinearOrder α]
[MulRightStrictMono α] (a b c : α) :
cmp (a * c) (b * c) = cmp a b :=
(strictMono_id.mul_const' c).cmp_map_eq a b
end Mono
/-- An element `a : α` is `MulLECancellable` if `x ↦ a * x` is order-reflecting.
We will make a separate version of many lemmas that require `[MulLeftReflectLE α]` with
`MulLECancellable` assumptions instead. These lemmas can then be instantiated to specific types,
like `ENNReal`, where we can replace the assumption `AddLECancellable x` by `x ≠ ∞`.
-/
@[to_additive
"An element `a : α` is `AddLECancellable` if `x ↦ a + x` is order-reflecting.
We will make a separate version of many lemmas that require `[MulLeftReflectLE α]` with
`AddLECancellable` assumptions instead. These lemmas can then be instantiated to specific types,
like `ENNReal`, where we can replace the assumption `AddLECancellable x` by `x ≠ ∞`. "]
def MulLECancellable [Mul α] [LE α] (a : α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃b c⦄, a * b ≤ a * c → b ≤ c
@[to_additive]
theorem Contravariant.MulLECancellable [Mul α] [LE α] [MulLeftReflectLE α]
{a : α} :
MulLECancellable a :=
fun _ _ => le_of_mul_le_mul_left'
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulLECancellable_one [MulOneClass α] [LE α] : MulLECancellable (1 : α) := fun a b => by
simpa only [one_mul] using id
namespace MulLECancellable
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Injective [Mul α] [PartialOrder α] {a : α} (ha : MulLECancellable a) :
Injective (a * ·) :=
fun _ _ h => le_antisymm (ha h.le) (ha h.ge)
@[to_additive]
protected theorem inj [Mul α] [PartialOrder α] {a b c : α} (ha : MulLECancellable a) :
a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
ha.Injective.eq_iff
@[to_additive]
protected theorem injective_left [Mul α] [i : @Std.Commutative α (· * ·)] [PartialOrder α] {a : α}
(ha : MulLECancellable a) :
Injective (· * a) := fun b c h => ha.Injective <| by dsimp; rwa [i.comm a, i.comm a]
@[to_additive]
protected theorem inj_left [Mul α] [@Std.Commutative α (· * ·)] [PartialOrder α] {a b c : α}
(hc : MulLECancellable c) :
a * c = b * c ↔ a = b :=
hc.injective_left.eq_iff
variable [LE α]
@[to_additive]
protected theorem mul_le_mul_iff_left [Mul α] [MulLeftMono α] {a b c : α}
(ha : MulLECancellable a) : a * b ≤ a * c ↔ b ≤ c :=
⟨fun h => ha h, fun h => mul_le_mul_left' h a⟩
@[to_additive]
protected theorem mul_le_mul_iff_right [Mul α] [i : @Std.Commutative α (· * ·)]
[MulLeftMono α] {a b c : α} (ha : MulLECancellable a) :
b * a ≤ c * a ↔ b ≤ c := by rw [i.comm b, i.comm c, ha.mul_le_mul_iff_left]
@[to_additive]
protected theorem le_mul_iff_one_le_right [MulOneClass α] [MulLeftMono α]
{a b : α} (ha : MulLECancellable a) :
a ≤ a * b ↔ 1 ≤ b :=
Iff.trans (by rw [mul_one]) ha.mul_le_mul_iff_left
@[to_additive]
protected theorem mul_le_iff_le_one_right [MulOneClass α] [MulLeftMono α]
{a b : α} (ha : MulLECancellable a) :
a * b ≤ a ↔ b ≤ 1 :=
Iff.trans (by rw [mul_one]) ha.mul_le_mul_iff_left
@[to_additive]
protected theorem le_mul_iff_one_le_left [MulOneClass α] [i : @Std.Commutative α (· * ·)]
[MulLeftMono α] {a b : α} (ha : MulLECancellable a) :
a ≤ b * a ↔ 1 ≤ b := by rw [i.comm, ha.le_mul_iff_one_le_right]
@[to_additive]
protected theorem mul_le_iff_le_one_left [MulOneClass α] [i : @Std.Commutative α (· * ·)]
[MulLeftMono α] {a b : α} (ha : MulLECancellable a) :
b * a ≤ a ↔ b ≤ 1 := by rw [i.comm, ha.mul_le_iff_le_one_right]
@[to_additive] lemma mul [Semigroup α] {a b : α} (ha : MulLECancellable a)
(hb : MulLECancellable b) : MulLECancellable (a * b) :=
fun c d hcd ↦ hb <| ha <| by rwa [← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc]
@[to_additive] lemma of_mul_right [Semigroup α] [MulLeftMono α] {a b : α}
(h : MulLECancellable (a * b)) : MulLECancellable b :=
fun c d hcd ↦ h <| by rw [mul_assoc, mul_assoc]; exact mul_le_mul_left' hcd _
@[to_additive] lemma of_mul_left [CommSemigroup α] [MulLeftMono α] {a b : α}
(h : MulLECancellable (a * b)) : MulLECancellable a := (mul_comm a b ▸ h).of_mul_right
end MulLECancellable
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma mulLECancellable_mul [LE α] [CommSemigroup α] [MulLeftMono α] {a b : α} :
MulLECancellable (a * b) ↔ MulLECancellable a ∧ MulLECancellable b :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.of_mul_left, h.of_mul_right⟩, fun h ↦ h.1.mul h.2⟩
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Monoid/Unbundled/Basic.lean | 1,610 | 1,611 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Prod
/-!
# The derivative of bounded bilinear maps
For detailed documentation of the Fréchet derivative,
see the module docstring of `Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Basic.lean`.
This file contains the usual formulas (and existence assertions) for the derivative of
bounded bilinear maps.
-/
open Asymptotics Topology
noncomputable section
section
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {G : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
variable {G' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G']
section BilinearMap
/-! ### Derivative of a bounded bilinear map -/
variable {b : E × F → G} {u : Set (E × F)}
open NormedField
-- TODO: rewrite/golf using analytic functions?
@[fun_prop]
theorem IsBoundedBilinearMap.hasStrictFDerivAt (h : IsBoundedBilinearMap 𝕜 b) (p : E × F) :
HasStrictFDerivAt b (h.deriv p) p := by
simp only [hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO]
simp only [← map_add_left_nhds_zero (p, p), isLittleO_map]
set T := (E × F) × E × F
calc
_ = fun x ↦ h.deriv (x.1 - x.2) (x.2.1, x.1.2) := by
ext ⟨⟨x₁, y₁⟩, ⟨x₂, y₂⟩⟩
rcases p with ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [map_sub, deriv_apply, Function.comp_apply, Prod.mk_add_mk, h.add_right, h.add_left,
Prod.mk_sub_mk, h.map_sub_left, h.map_sub_right, sub_add_sub_cancel]
abel
-- _ =O[𝓝 (0 : T)] fun x ↦ ‖x.1 - x.2‖ * ‖(x.2.1, x.1.2)‖ :=
-- h.toContinuousLinearMap.deriv₂.isBoundedBilinearMap.isBigO_comp
-- _ = o[𝓝 0] fun x ↦ ‖x.1 - x.2‖ * 1 := _
_ =o[𝓝 (0 : T)] fun x ↦ x.1 - x.2 := by
-- TODO : add 2 `calc` steps instead of the next 3 lines
refine h.toContinuousLinearMap.deriv₂.isBoundedBilinearMap.isBigO_comp.trans_isLittleO ?_
suffices (fun x : T ↦ ‖x.1 - x.2‖ * ‖(x.2.1, x.1.2)‖) =o[𝓝 0] fun x ↦ ‖x.1 - x.2‖ * 1 by
simpa only [mul_one, isLittleO_norm_right] using this
refine (isBigO_refl _ _).mul_isLittleO ((isLittleO_one_iff _).2 ?_)
-- TODO: `continuity` fails
exact (continuous_snd.fst.prodMk continuous_fst.snd).norm.tendsto' _ _ (by simp)
_ = _ := by simp [T, Function.comp_def]
@[fun_prop]
theorem IsBoundedBilinearMap.hasFDerivAt (h : IsBoundedBilinearMap 𝕜 b) (p : E × F) :
HasFDerivAt b (h.deriv p) p :=
(h.hasStrictFDerivAt p).hasFDerivAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem IsBoundedBilinearMap.hasFDerivWithinAt (h : IsBoundedBilinearMap 𝕜 b) (p : E × F) :
HasFDerivWithinAt b (h.deriv p) u p :=
(h.hasFDerivAt p).hasFDerivWithinAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem IsBoundedBilinearMap.differentiableAt (h : IsBoundedBilinearMap 𝕜 b) (p : E × F) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 b p :=
(h.hasFDerivAt p).differentiableAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem IsBoundedBilinearMap.differentiableWithinAt (h : IsBoundedBilinearMap 𝕜 b) (p : E × F) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 b u p :=
(h.differentiableAt p).differentiableWithinAt
protected theorem IsBoundedBilinearMap.fderiv (h : IsBoundedBilinearMap 𝕜 b) (p : E × F) :
fderiv 𝕜 b p = h.deriv p :=
HasFDerivAt.fderiv (h.hasFDerivAt p)
protected theorem IsBoundedBilinearMap.fderivWithin (h : IsBoundedBilinearMap 𝕜 b) (p : E × F)
(hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 u p) : fderivWithin 𝕜 b u p = h.deriv p := by
rw [DifferentiableAt.fderivWithin (h.differentiableAt p) hxs]
exact h.fderiv p
@[fun_prop]
theorem IsBoundedBilinearMap.differentiable (h : IsBoundedBilinearMap 𝕜 b) : Differentiable 𝕜 b :=
fun x => h.differentiableAt x
@[fun_prop]
theorem IsBoundedBilinearMap.differentiableOn (h : IsBoundedBilinearMap 𝕜 b) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 b u :=
h.differentiable.differentiableOn
variable (B : E →L[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] G)
| #adaptation_note /-- https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/6024
need `by exact` to deal with tricky unification -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.hasFDerivWithinAt_of_bilinear {f : G' → E} {g : G' → F}
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Bilinear.lean | 106 | 109 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.DFinsupp
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.Defs
/-!
# Direct sum of modules
The first part of the file provides constructors for direct sums of modules. It provides a
construction of the direct sum using the universal property and proves its uniqueness
(`DirectSum.toModule.unique`).
The second part of the file covers the special case of direct sums of submodules of a fixed module
`M`. There is a canonical linear map from this direct sum to `M` (`DirectSum.coeLinearMap`), and
the construction is of particular importance when this linear map is an equivalence; that is, when
the submodules provide an internal decomposition of `M`. The property is defined more generally
elsewhere as `DirectSum.IsInternal`, but its basic consequences on `Submodule`s are established
in this file.
-/
universe u v w u₁
namespace DirectSum
open DirectSum Finsupp
section General
variable {R : Type u} [Semiring R]
variable {ι : Type v}
variable {M : ι → Type w} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M i)] [∀ i, Module R (M i)]
instance : Module R (⨁ i, M i) :=
DFinsupp.module
instance {S : Type*} [Semiring S] [∀ i, Module S (M i)] [∀ i, SMulCommClass R S (M i)] :
SMulCommClass R S (⨁ i, M i) :=
DFinsupp.smulCommClass
instance {S : Type*} [Semiring S] [SMul R S] [∀ i, Module S (M i)] [∀ i, IsScalarTower R S (M i)] :
IsScalarTower R S (⨁ i, M i) :=
DFinsupp.isScalarTower
instance [∀ i, Module Rᵐᵒᵖ (M i)] [∀ i, IsCentralScalar R (M i)] : IsCentralScalar R (⨁ i, M i) :=
DFinsupp.isCentralScalar
theorem smul_apply (b : R) (v : ⨁ i, M i) (i : ι) : (b • v) i = b • v i :=
DFinsupp.smul_apply _ _ _
variable (R) in
/-- Coercion from a `DirectSum` to a pi type is a `LinearMap`. -/
def coeFnLinearMap : (⨁ i, M i) →ₗ[R] ∀ i, M i :=
DFinsupp.coeFnLinearMap R
@[simp]
lemma coeFnLinearMap_apply (v : ⨁ i, M i) : coeFnLinearMap R v = v :=
rfl
variable (R ι M)
section DecidableEq
variable [DecidableEq ι]
/-- Create the direct sum given a family `M` of `R` modules indexed over `ι`. -/
def lmk : ∀ s : Finset ι, (∀ i : (↑s : Set ι), M i.val) →ₗ[R] ⨁ i, M i :=
DFinsupp.lmk
/-- Inclusion of each component into the direct sum. -/
def lof : ∀ i : ι, M i →ₗ[R] ⨁ i, M i :=
DFinsupp.lsingle
theorem lof_eq_of (i : ι) (b : M i) : lof R ι M i b = of M i b := rfl
variable {ι M}
theorem single_eq_lof (i : ι) (b : M i) : DFinsupp.single i b = lof R ι M i b := rfl
/-- Scalar multiplication commutes with direct sums. -/
theorem mk_smul (s : Finset ι) (c : R) (x) : mk M s (c • x) = c • mk M s x :=
(lmk R ι M s).map_smul c x
/-- Scalar multiplication commutes with the inclusion of each component into the direct sum. -/
theorem of_smul (i : ι) (c : R) (x) : of M i (c • x) = c • of M i x :=
(lof R ι M i).map_smul c x
variable {R}
theorem support_smul [∀ (i : ι) (x : M i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (c : R) (v : ⨁ i, M i) :
(c • v).support ⊆ v.support :=
DFinsupp.support_smul _ _
variable {N : Type u₁} [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
variable (φ : ∀ i, M i →ₗ[R] N)
variable (R ι N)
/-- The linear map constructed using the universal property of the coproduct. -/
def toModule : (⨁ i, M i) →ₗ[R] N :=
DFunLike.coe (DFinsupp.lsum ℕ) φ
/-- Coproducts in the categories of modules and additive monoids commute with the forgetful functor
from modules to additive monoids. -/
theorem coe_toModule_eq_coe_toAddMonoid :
(toModule R ι N φ : (⨁ i, M i) → N) = toAddMonoid fun i ↦ (φ i).toAddMonoidHom := rfl
variable {ι N φ}
/-- The map constructed using the universal property gives back the original maps when
restricted to each component. -/
@[simp]
theorem toModule_lof (i) (x : M i) : toModule R ι N φ (lof R ι M i x) = φ i x :=
toAddMonoid_of (fun i ↦ (φ i).toAddMonoidHom) i x
variable (ψ : (⨁ i, M i) →ₗ[R] N)
/-- Every linear map from a direct sum agrees with the one obtained by applying
the universal property to each of its components. -/
theorem toModule.unique (f : ⨁ i, M i) : ψ f = toModule R ι N (fun i ↦ ψ.comp <| lof R ι M i) f :=
toAddMonoid.unique ψ.toAddMonoidHom f
variable {ψ} {ψ' : (⨁ i, M i) →ₗ[R] N}
/-- Two `LinearMap`s out of a direct sum are equal if they agree on the generators.
See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext]
theorem linearMap_ext ⦃ψ ψ' : (⨁ i, M i) →ₗ[R] N⦄
(H : ∀ i, ψ.comp (lof R ι M i) = ψ'.comp (lof R ι M i)) : ψ = ψ' :=
DFinsupp.lhom_ext' H
/-- The inclusion of a subset of the direct summands
into a larger subset of the direct summands, as a linear map. -/
def lsetToSet (S T : Set ι) (H : S ⊆ T) : (⨁ i : S, M i) →ₗ[R] ⨁ i : T, M i :=
toModule R _ _ fun i ↦ lof R T (fun i : Subtype T ↦ M i) ⟨i, H i.prop⟩
variable (ι M)
/-- Given `Fintype α`, `linearEquivFunOnFintype R` is the natural `R`-linear equivalence
between `⨁ i, M i` and `∀ i, M i`. -/
@[simps apply]
def linearEquivFunOnFintype [Fintype ι] : (⨁ i, M i) ≃ₗ[R] ∀ i, M i :=
{ DFinsupp.equivFunOnFintype with
toFun := (↑)
map_add' := fun f g ↦ by
ext
rw [add_apply, Pi.add_apply]
map_smul' := fun c f ↦ by
simp_rw [RingHom.id_apply]
rw [DFinsupp.coe_smul] }
variable {ι M}
@[simp]
theorem linearEquivFunOnFintype_lof [Fintype ι] (i : ι) (m : M i) :
(linearEquivFunOnFintype R ι M) (lof R ι M i m) = Pi.single i m := by
ext a
change (DFinsupp.equivFunOnFintype (lof R ι M i m)) a = _
convert _root_.congr_fun (DFinsupp.equivFunOnFintype_single i m) a
@[simp]
theorem linearEquivFunOnFintype_symm_single [Fintype ι] (i : ι) (m : M i) :
(linearEquivFunOnFintype R ι M).symm (Pi.single i m) = lof R ι M i m := by
change (DFinsupp.equivFunOnFintype.symm (Pi.single i m)) = _
rw [DFinsupp.equivFunOnFintype_symm_single i m]
rfl
end DecidableEq
@[simp]
theorem linearEquivFunOnFintype_symm_coe [Fintype ι] (f : ⨁ i, M i) :
(linearEquivFunOnFintype R ι M).symm f = f := by
simp [linearEquivFunOnFintype]
/-- The natural linear equivalence between `⨁ _ : ι, M` and `M` when `Unique ι`. -/
protected def lid (M : Type v) (ι : Type* := PUnit) [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [Unique ι] :
(⨁ _ : ι, M) ≃ₗ[R] M :=
{ DirectSum.id M ι, toModule R ι M fun _ ↦ LinearMap.id with }
/-- The projection map onto one component, as a linear map. -/
def component (i : ι) : (⨁ i, M i) →ₗ[R] M i :=
DFinsupp.lapply i
variable {ι M}
theorem apply_eq_component (f : ⨁ i, M i) (i : ι) : f i = component R ι M i f := rfl
-- Note(kmill): `@[ext]` cannot prove `ext_iff` because `R` is not determined by `f` or `g`.
-- This is not useful as an `@[ext]` lemma as the `ext` tactic can not infer `R`.
theorem ext_component {f g : ⨁ i, M i} (h : ∀ i, component R ι M i f = component R ι M i g) :
f = g :=
DFinsupp.ext h
theorem ext_component_iff {f g : ⨁ i, M i} :
f = g ↔ ∀ i, component R ι M i f = component R ι M i g :=
⟨fun h _ ↦ by rw [h], ext_component R⟩
@[simp]
theorem lof_apply [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) (b : M i) : ((lof R ι M i) b) i = b :=
DFinsupp.single_eq_same
@[simp]
theorem component.lof_self [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) (b : M i) :
component R ι M i ((lof R ι M i) b) = b :=
lof_apply R i b
theorem component.of [DecidableEq ι] (i j : ι) (b : M j) :
component R ι M i ((lof R ι M j) b) = if h : j = i then Eq.recOn h b else 0 :=
DFinsupp.single_apply
section map
variable {R} {N : ι → Type*}
section AddCommMonoid
variable [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (N i)] [∀ i, Module R (N i)]
section
variable (f : ∀ i, M i →+ N i)
lemma mker_map :
AddMonoidHom.mker (map f) =
(AddSubmonoid.pi Set.univ (fun i ↦ AddMonoidHom.mker (f i))).comap (coeFnAddMonoidHom M) :=
DFinsupp.mker_mapRangeAddMonoidHom f
lemma mrange_map :
AddMonoidHom.mrange (map f) =
(AddSubmonoid.pi Set.univ (fun i ↦ AddMonoidHom.mrange (f i))).comap (coeFnAddMonoidHom N) :=
DFinsupp.mrange_mapRangeAddMonoidHom f
end
variable (f : Π i, M i →ₗ[R] N i)
/-- The linear map between direct sums induced by a family of linear maps. -/
def lmap : (⨁ i, M i) →ₗ[R] ⨁ i, N i := DFinsupp.mapRange.linearMap f
@[simp] theorem lmap_apply (x i) : lmap f x i = f i (x i) := rfl
@[simp] lemma lmap_of [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) (x : M i) :
lmap f (of M i x) = of N i (f i x) :=
DFinsupp.mapRange_single (hf := fun _ => map_zero _)
@[simp] theorem lmap_lof [DecidableEq ι] (i) (x : M i) :
lmap f (lof R _ _ _ x) = lof R _ _ _ (f i x) :=
DFinsupp.mapRange_single (hf := fun _ ↦ map_zero _)
@[simp] lemma lmap_id :
(lmap (fun i ↦ LinearMap.id (R := R) (M := M i))) = LinearMap.id :=
DFinsupp.mapRange.linearMap_id
@[simp] lemma lmap_comp {K : ι → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (K i)] [∀ i, Module R (K i)]
(g : ∀ (i : ι), N i →ₗ[R] K i) :
(lmap (fun i ↦ (g i) ∘ₗ (f i))) = (lmap g) ∘ₗ (lmap f) :=
DFinsupp.mapRange.linearMap_comp _ _
theorem lmap_injective : Function.Injective (lmap f) ↔ ∀ i, Function.Injective (f i) := by
classical exact DFinsupp.mapRange_injective (hf := fun _ ↦ map_zero _)
theorem lmap_surjective : Function.Surjective (lmap f) ↔ (∀ i, Function.Surjective (f i)) := by
classical exact DFinsupp.mapRange_surjective (hf := fun _ ↦ map_zero _)
lemma lmap_eq_iff (x y : ⨁ i, M i) :
lmap f x = lmap f y ↔ ∀ i, f i (x i) = f i (y i) :=
map_eq_iff (fun i => (f i).toAddMonoidHom) _ _
lemma toAddMonoidHom_lmap :
(lmap f).toAddMonoidHom = map (fun i => (f i).toAddMonoidHom) :=
rfl
lemma lmap_eq_map (x : ⨁ i, M i) : lmap f x = map (fun i => (f i).toAddMonoidHom) x :=
rfl
lemma ker_lmap :
LinearMap.ker (lmap f) =
(Submodule.pi Set.univ (fun i ↦ LinearMap.ker (f i))).comap (DirectSum.coeFnLinearMap R) :=
DFinsupp.ker_mapRangeLinearMap f
lemma range_lmap :
LinearMap.range (lmap f) =
(Submodule.pi Set.univ (fun i ↦ LinearMap.range (f i))).comap (DirectSum.coeFnLinearMap R) :=
DFinsupp.range_mapRangeLinearMap f
end AddCommMonoid
section AddCommGroup
variable {R : Type u} {ι : Type v} {M : ι → Type w} {N : ι → Type*}
lemma ker_map [∀ i, AddCommGroup (M i)] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (N i)] (f : ∀ i, M i →+ N i) :
(map f).ker =
(AddSubgroup.pi Set.univ (f · |>.ker)).comap (DirectSum.coeFnAddMonoidHom M) :=
DFinsupp.ker_mapRangeAddMonoidHom f
lemma range_map [∀ i, AddCommGroup (M i)] [∀ i, AddCommGroup (N i)] (f : ∀ i, M i →+ N i) :
(map f).range =
(AddSubgroup.pi Set.univ (f · |>.range)).comap (DirectSum.coeFnAddMonoidHom N) :=
DFinsupp.range_mapRangeAddMonoidHom f
end AddCommGroup
end map
section CongrLeft
variable {κ : Type*}
/-- Reindexing terms of a direct sum is linear. -/
def lequivCongrLeft (h : ι ≃ κ) : (⨁ i, M i) ≃ₗ[R] ⨁ k, M (h.symm k) :=
{ equivCongrLeft h with map_smul' := DFinsupp.comapDomain'_smul h.invFun h.right_inv }
@[simp]
theorem lequivCongrLeft_apply (h : ι ≃ κ) (f : ⨁ i, M i) (k : κ) :
lequivCongrLeft R h f k = f (h.symm k) :=
equivCongrLeft_apply _ _ _
end CongrLeft
section Sigma
variable {α : ι → Type*} {δ : ∀ i, α i → Type w}
variable [DecidableEq ι] [∀ i j, AddCommMonoid (δ i j)] [∀ i j, Module R (δ i j)]
/-- `curry` as a linear map. -/
def sigmaLcurry : (⨁ i : Σ_, _, δ i.1 i.2) →ₗ[R] ⨁ (i) (j), δ i j :=
{ sigmaCurry with map_smul' := fun r ↦ by convert DFinsupp.sigmaCurry_smul (δ := δ) r }
@[simp]
theorem sigmaLcurry_apply (f : ⨁ i : Σ _, _, δ i.1 i.2) (i : ι) (j : α i) :
sigmaLcurry R f i j = f ⟨i, j⟩ :=
sigmaCurry_apply f i j
/-- `uncurry` as a linear map. -/
def sigmaLuncurry : (⨁ (i) (j), δ i j) →ₗ[R] ⨁ i : Σ_, _, δ i.1 i.2 :=
{ sigmaUncurry with map_smul' := DFinsupp.sigmaUncurry_smul }
@[simp]
theorem sigmaLuncurry_apply (f : ⨁ (i) (j), δ i j) (i : ι) (j : α i) :
sigmaLuncurry R f ⟨i, j⟩ = f i j :=
sigmaUncurry_apply f i j
/-- `curryEquiv` as a linear equiv. -/
def sigmaLcurryEquiv : (⨁ i : Σ_, _, δ i.1 i.2) ≃ₗ[R] ⨁ (i) (j), δ i j :=
{ sigmaCurryEquiv, sigmaLcurry R with }
end Sigma
section Option
variable {α : Option ι → Type w} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (α i)] [∀ i, Module R (α i)]
/-- Linear isomorphism obtained by separating the term of index `none` of a direct sum over
`Option ι`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def lequivProdDirectSum : (⨁ i, α i) ≃ₗ[R] α none × ⨁ i, α (some i) :=
{ addEquivProdDirectSum with map_smul' := DFinsupp.equivProdDFinsupp_smul }
end Option
end General
section Submodule
section Semiring
variable {R : Type u} [Semiring R]
variable {ι : Type v} [dec_ι : DecidableEq ι]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable (A : ι → Submodule R M)
/-- The canonical linear map from `⨁ i, A i` to `M` where `A` is a collection of `Submodule R M`
indexed by `ι`. This is `DirectSum.coeAddMonoidHom` as a `LinearMap`. -/
def coeLinearMap : (⨁ i, A i) →ₗ[R] M :=
toModule R ι M fun i ↦ (A i).subtype
theorem coeLinearMap_eq_dfinsuppSum [DecidableEq M] (x : DirectSum ι fun i => A i) :
coeLinearMap A x = DFinsupp.sum x fun i => (fun x : A i => ↑x) := by
simp only [coeLinearMap, toModule, DFinsupp.lsum, LinearEquiv.coe_mk, LinearMap.coe_mk,
AddHom.coe_mk]
rw [DFinsupp.sumAddHom_apply]
simp only [LinearMap.toAddMonoidHom_coe, Submodule.coe_subtype]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-06")]
alias coeLinearMap_eq_dfinsupp_sum := coeLinearMap_eq_dfinsuppSum
@[simp]
theorem coeLinearMap_of (i : ι) (x : A i) : DirectSum.coeLinearMap A (of (fun i ↦ A i) i x) = x :=
-- Porting note: spelled out arguments. (I don't know how this works.)
toAddMonoid_of (β := fun i => A i) (fun i ↦ ((A i).subtype : A i →+ M)) i x
variable {A}
| theorem range_coeLinearMap : LinearMap.range (coeLinearMap A) = ⨆ i, A i :=
(Submodule.iSup_eq_range_dfinsupp_lsum _).symm
@[simp]
theorem IsInternal.ofBijective_coeLinearMap_same (h : IsInternal A)
| Mathlib/Algebra/DirectSum/Module.lean | 396 | 400 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Filippo A. E. Nuccio
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.EuclideanDomain.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FractionalIdeal.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IntegralClosure.IsIntegral.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.LocalRing.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PrincipalIdealDomain
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
/-!
# More operations on fractional ideals
## Main definitions
* `map` is the pushforward of a fractional ideal along an algebra morphism
Let `K` be the localization of `R` at `R⁰ = R \ {0}` (i.e. the field of fractions).
* `FractionalIdeal R⁰ K` is the type of fractional ideals in the field of fractions
* `Div (FractionalIdeal R⁰ K)` instance:
the ideal quotient `I / J` (typically written $I : J$, but a `:` operator cannot be defined)
## Main statement
* `isNoetherian` states that every fractional ideal of a noetherian integral domain is noetherian
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional_ideal
## Tags
fractional ideal, fractional ideals, invertible ideal
-/
open IsLocalization Pointwise nonZeroDivisors
namespace FractionalIdeal
open Set Submodule
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {S : Submonoid R} {P : Type*} [CommRing P]
variable [Algebra R P]
section
variable {P' : Type*} [CommRing P'] [Algebra R P']
variable {P'' : Type*} [CommRing P''] [Algebra R P'']
theorem _root_.IsFractional.map (g : P →ₐ[R] P') {I : Submodule R P} :
IsFractional S I → IsFractional S (Submodule.map g.toLinearMap I)
| ⟨a, a_nonzero, hI⟩ =>
⟨a, a_nonzero, fun b hb => by
obtain ⟨b', b'_mem, hb'⟩ := Submodule.mem_map.mp hb
rw [AlgHom.toLinearMap_apply] at hb'
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := hI b' b'_mem
use x
rw [← g.commutes, hx, map_smul, hb']⟩
/-- `I.map g` is the pushforward of the fractional ideal `I` along the algebra morphism `g` -/
def map (g : P →ₐ[R] P') : FractionalIdeal S P → FractionalIdeal S P' := fun I =>
⟨Submodule.map g.toLinearMap I, I.isFractional.map g⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_map (g : P →ₐ[R] P') (I : FractionalIdeal S P) :
↑(map g I) = Submodule.map g.toLinearMap I :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {I : FractionalIdeal S P} {g : P →ₐ[R] P'} {y : P'} :
y ∈ I.map g ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ I ∧ g x = y :=
Submodule.mem_map
variable (I J : FractionalIdeal S P) (g : P →ₐ[R] P')
@[simp]
theorem map_id : I.map (AlgHom.id _ _) = I :=
coeToSubmodule_injective (Submodule.map_id (I : Submodule R P))
@[simp]
theorem map_comp (g' : P' →ₐ[R] P'') : I.map (g'.comp g) = (I.map g).map g' :=
coeToSubmodule_injective (Submodule.map_comp g.toLinearMap g'.toLinearMap I)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem map_coeIdeal (I : Ideal R) : (I : FractionalIdeal S P).map g = I := by
ext x
simp only [mem_coeIdeal]
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨y, hy, (g.commutes y).symm⟩
· rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩, g.commutes y⟩
@[simp]
protected theorem map_one : (1 : FractionalIdeal S P).map g = 1 :=
map_coeIdeal g ⊤
@[simp]
protected theorem map_zero : (0 : FractionalIdeal S P).map g = 0 :=
map_coeIdeal g 0
@[simp]
protected theorem map_add : (I + J).map g = I.map g + J.map g :=
coeToSubmodule_injective (Submodule.map_sup _ _ _)
@[simp]
protected theorem map_mul : (I * J).map g = I.map g * J.map g := by
simp only [mul_def]
exact coeToSubmodule_injective (Submodule.map_mul _ _ _)
@[simp]
theorem map_map_symm (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') : (I.map (g : P →ₐ[R] P')).map (g.symm : P' →ₐ[R] P) = I := by
rw [← map_comp, g.symm_comp, map_id]
@[simp]
theorem map_symm_map (I : FractionalIdeal S P') (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') :
(I.map (g.symm : P' →ₐ[R] P)).map (g : P →ₐ[R] P') = I := by
rw [← map_comp, g.comp_symm, map_id]
theorem map_mem_map {f : P →ₐ[R] P'} (h : Function.Injective f) {x : P} {I : FractionalIdeal S P} :
f x ∈ map f I ↔ x ∈ I :=
mem_map.trans ⟨fun ⟨_, hx', x'_eq⟩ => h x'_eq ▸ hx', fun h => ⟨x, h, rfl⟩⟩
theorem map_injective (f : P →ₐ[R] P') (h : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (map f : FractionalIdeal S P → FractionalIdeal S P') := fun _ _ hIJ =>
ext fun _ => (map_mem_map h).symm.trans (hIJ.symm ▸ map_mem_map h)
/-- If `g` is an equivalence, `map g` is an isomorphism -/
def mapEquiv (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') : FractionalIdeal S P ≃+* FractionalIdeal S P' where
toFun := map g
invFun := map g.symm
map_add' I J := FractionalIdeal.map_add I J _
map_mul' I J := FractionalIdeal.map_mul I J _
left_inv I := by rw [← map_comp, AlgEquiv.symm_comp, map_id]
right_inv I := by rw [← map_comp, AlgEquiv.comp_symm, map_id]
@[simp]
theorem coeFun_mapEquiv (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') :
(mapEquiv g : FractionalIdeal S P → FractionalIdeal S P') = map g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapEquiv_apply (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') (I : FractionalIdeal S P) : mapEquiv g I = map (↑g) I :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapEquiv_symm (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') :
((mapEquiv g).symm : FractionalIdeal S P' ≃+* _) = mapEquiv g.symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapEquiv_refl : mapEquiv AlgEquiv.refl = RingEquiv.refl (FractionalIdeal S P) :=
RingEquiv.ext fun x => by simp
theorem isFractional_span_iff {s : Set P} :
IsFractional S (span R s) ↔ ∃ a ∈ S, ∀ b : P, b ∈ s → IsInteger R (a • b) :=
⟨fun ⟨a, a_mem, h⟩ => ⟨a, a_mem, fun b hb => h b (subset_span hb)⟩, fun ⟨a, a_mem, h⟩ =>
⟨a, a_mem, fun _ hb =>
span_induction (hx := hb) h
(by
rw [smul_zero]
exact isInteger_zero)
(fun x y _ _ hx hy => by
rw [smul_add]
exact isInteger_add hx hy)
fun s x _ hx => by
rw [smul_comm]
exact isInteger_smul hx⟩⟩
theorem isFractional_of_fg [IsLocalization S P] {I : Submodule R P} (hI : I.FG) :
IsFractional S I := by
rcases hI with ⟨I, rfl⟩
rcases exist_integer_multiples_of_finset S I with ⟨⟨s, hs1⟩, hs⟩
rw [isFractional_span_iff]
exact ⟨s, hs1, hs⟩
theorem mem_span_mul_finite_of_mem_mul {I J : FractionalIdeal S P} {x : P} (hx : x ∈ I * J) :
∃ T T' : Finset P, (T : Set P) ⊆ I ∧ (T' : Set P) ⊆ J ∧ x ∈ span R (T * T' : Set P) :=
Submodule.mem_span_mul_finite_of_mem_mul (by simpa using mem_coe.mpr hx)
variable (S) in
theorem coeIdeal_fg (inj : Function.Injective (algebraMap R P)) (I : Ideal R) :
FG ((I : FractionalIdeal S P) : Submodule R P) ↔ I.FG :=
coeSubmodule_fg _ inj _
theorem fg_unit (I : (FractionalIdeal S P)ˣ) : FG (I : Submodule R P) :=
Submodule.fg_unit <| Units.map (coeSubmoduleHom S P).toMonoidHom I
theorem fg_of_isUnit (I : FractionalIdeal S P) (h : IsUnit I) : FG (I : Submodule R P) :=
fg_unit h.unit
theorem _root_.Ideal.fg_of_isUnit (inj : Function.Injective (algebraMap R P)) (I : Ideal R)
(h : IsUnit (I : FractionalIdeal S P)) : I.FG := by
rw [← coeIdeal_fg S inj I]
exact FractionalIdeal.fg_of_isUnit (R := R) I h
variable (S P P')
variable [IsLocalization S P] [IsLocalization S P']
/-- `canonicalEquiv f f'` is the canonical equivalence between the fractional
ideals in `P` and in `P'`, which are both localizations of `R` at `S`. -/
noncomputable irreducible_def canonicalEquiv : FractionalIdeal S P ≃+* FractionalIdeal S P' :=
mapEquiv
{ ringEquivOfRingEquiv P P' (RingEquiv.refl R)
(show S.map _ = S by rw [RingEquiv.toMonoidHom_refl, Submonoid.map_id]) with
commutes' := fun _ => ringEquivOfRingEquiv_eq _ _ }
@[simp]
theorem mem_canonicalEquiv_apply {I : FractionalIdeal S P} {x : P'} :
x ∈ canonicalEquiv S P P' I ↔
∃ y ∈ I,
IsLocalization.map P' (RingHom.id R) (fun y (hy : y ∈ S) => show RingHom.id R y ∈ S from hy)
(y : P) =
x := by
rw [canonicalEquiv, mapEquiv_apply, mem_map]
exact ⟨fun ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩ => ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩, fun ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩ => ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem canonicalEquiv_symm : (canonicalEquiv S P P').symm = canonicalEquiv S P' P :=
RingEquiv.ext fun I =>
SetLike.ext_iff.mpr fun x => by
rw [mem_canonicalEquiv_apply, canonicalEquiv, mapEquiv_symm, mapEquiv_apply,
mem_map]
exact ⟨fun ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩ => ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩, fun ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩ => ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩⟩
theorem canonicalEquiv_flip (I) : canonicalEquiv S P P' (canonicalEquiv S P' P I) = I := by
rw [← canonicalEquiv_symm, RingEquiv.symm_apply_apply]
@[simp]
theorem canonicalEquiv_canonicalEquiv (P'' : Type*) [CommRing P''] [Algebra R P'']
[IsLocalization S P''] (I : FractionalIdeal S P) :
canonicalEquiv S P' P'' (canonicalEquiv S P P' I) = canonicalEquiv S P P'' I := by
ext
simp only [IsLocalization.map_map, RingHomInvPair.comp_eq₂, mem_canonicalEquiv_apply,
exists_prop, exists_exists_and_eq_and]
theorem canonicalEquiv_trans_canonicalEquiv (P'' : Type*) [CommRing P''] [Algebra R P'']
[IsLocalization S P''] :
(canonicalEquiv S P P').trans (canonicalEquiv S P' P'') = canonicalEquiv S P P'' :=
RingEquiv.ext (canonicalEquiv_canonicalEquiv S P P' P'')
@[simp]
theorem canonicalEquiv_coeIdeal (I : Ideal R) : canonicalEquiv S P P' I = I := by
ext
simp [IsLocalization.map_eq]
@[simp]
theorem canonicalEquiv_self : canonicalEquiv S P P = RingEquiv.refl _ := by
rw [← canonicalEquiv_trans_canonicalEquiv S P P]
convert (canonicalEquiv S P P).symm_trans_self
exact (canonicalEquiv_symm S P P).symm
end
section IsFractionRing
/-!
### `IsFractionRing` section
This section concerns fractional ideals in the field of fractions,
i.e. the type `FractionalIdeal R⁰ K` where `IsFractionRing R K`.
-/
variable {K K' : Type*} [Field K] [Field K']
variable [Algebra R K] [IsFractionRing R K] [Algebra R K'] [IsFractionRing R K']
variable {I J : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K} (h : K →ₐ[R] K')
/-- Nonzero fractional ideals contain a nonzero integer. -/
theorem exists_ne_zero_mem_isInteger [Nontrivial R] (hI : I ≠ 0) :
∃ x, x ≠ 0 ∧ algebraMap R K x ∈ I := by
obtain ⟨y : K, y_mem, y_not_mem⟩ :=
SetLike.exists_of_lt (by simpa only using bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr hI)
have y_ne_zero : y ≠ 0 := by simpa using y_not_mem
obtain ⟨z, ⟨x, hx⟩⟩ := exists_integer_multiple R⁰ y
refine ⟨x, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [Ne, ← @IsFractionRing.to_map_eq_zero_iff R _ K, hx, Algebra.smul_def]
exact mul_ne_zero (IsFractionRing.to_map_ne_zero_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors z.2) y_ne_zero
· rw [hx]
exact smul_mem _ _ y_mem
theorem map_ne_zero [Nontrivial R] (hI : I ≠ 0) : I.map h ≠ 0 := by
obtain ⟨x, x_ne_zero, hx⟩ := exists_ne_zero_mem_isInteger hI
contrapose! x_ne_zero with map_eq_zero
refine IsFractionRing.to_map_eq_zero_iff.mp (eq_zero_iff.mp map_eq_zero _ (mem_map.mpr ?_))
exact ⟨algebraMap R K x, hx, h.commutes x⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_zero_iff [Nontrivial R] : I.map h = 0 ↔ I = 0 :=
⟨not_imp_not.mp (map_ne_zero _), fun hI => hI.symm ▸ FractionalIdeal.map_zero h⟩
theorem coeIdeal_injective : Function.Injective (fun (I : Ideal R) ↦ (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K)) :=
coeIdeal_injective' le_rfl
theorem coeIdeal_inj {I J : Ideal R} :
(I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) = (J : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ↔ I = J :=
coeIdeal_inj' le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem coeIdeal_eq_zero {I : Ideal R} : (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) = 0 ↔ I = ⊥ :=
coeIdeal_eq_zero' le_rfl
theorem coeIdeal_ne_zero {I : Ideal R} : (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ≠ 0 ↔ I ≠ ⊥ :=
coeIdeal_ne_zero' le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem coeIdeal_eq_one {I : Ideal R} : (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) = 1 ↔ I = 1 := by
simpa only [Ideal.one_eq_top] using coeIdeal_inj
theorem coeIdeal_ne_one {I : Ideal R} : (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ≠ 1 ↔ I ≠ 1 :=
not_iff_not.mpr coeIdeal_eq_one
theorem num_eq_zero_iff [Nontrivial R] {I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K} : I.num = 0 ↔ I = 0 :=
⟨fun h ↦ zero_of_num_eq_bot zero_not_mem_nonZeroDivisors h,
fun h ↦ h ▸ num_zero_eq (IsFractionRing.injective R K)⟩
end IsFractionRing
section Quotient
/-!
### `quotient` section
This section defines the ideal quotient of fractional ideals.
In this section we need that each non-zero `y : R` has an inverse in
the localization, i.e. that the localization is a field. We satisfy this
assumption by taking `S = nonZeroDivisors R`, `R`'s localization at which
is a field because `R` is a domain.
-/
variable {R₁ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] {K : Type*} [Field K]
variable [Algebra R₁ K]
instance : Nontrivial (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) :=
⟨⟨0, 1, fun h =>
have this : (1 : K) ∈ (0 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) := by
rw [← (algebraMap R₁ K).map_one]
simpa only [h] using coe_mem_one R₁⁰ 1
one_ne_zero ((mem_zero_iff _).mp this)⟩⟩
theorem ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one (I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : I * J = 1) : I ≠ 0 := fun hI =>
zero_ne_one' (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)
(by
convert h
simp [hI])
variable [IsFractionRing R₁ K] [IsDomain R₁]
theorem _root_.IsFractional.div_of_nonzero {I J : Submodule R₁ K} :
IsFractional R₁⁰ I → IsFractional R₁⁰ J → J ≠ 0 → IsFractional R₁⁰ (I / J)
| ⟨aI, haI, hI⟩, ⟨aJ, haJ, hJ⟩, h => by
obtain ⟨y, mem_J, not_mem_zero⟩ :=
SetLike.exists_of_lt (show 0 < J by simpa only using bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr h)
obtain ⟨y', hy'⟩ := hJ y mem_J
use aI * y'
constructor
· apply (nonZeroDivisors R₁).mul_mem haI (mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.mpr _)
intro y'_eq_zero
have : algebraMap R₁ K aJ * y = 0 := by
rw [← Algebra.smul_def, ← hy', y'_eq_zero, RingHom.map_zero]
have y_zero :=
(mul_eq_zero.mp this).resolve_left
(mt ((injective_iff_map_eq_zero (algebraMap R₁ K)).1 (IsFractionRing.injective _ _) _)
(mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.mp haJ))
apply not_mem_zero
simpa
intro b hb
convert hI _ (hb _ (Submodule.smul_mem _ aJ mem_J)) using 1
rw [← hy', mul_comm b, ← Algebra.smul_def, mul_smul]
theorem fractional_div_of_nonzero {I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (h : J ≠ 0) :
IsFractional R₁⁰ (I / J : Submodule R₁ K) :=
I.isFractional.div_of_nonzero J.isFractional fun H =>
h <| coeToSubmodule_injective <| H.trans coe_zero.symm
open Classical in
noncomputable instance : Div (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) :=
⟨fun I J => if h : J = 0 then 0 else ⟨I / J, fractional_div_of_nonzero h⟩⟩
variable {I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K}
@[simp]
theorem div_zero {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I / 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
theorem div_nonzero {I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (h : J ≠ 0) :
I / J = ⟨I / J, fractional_div_of_nonzero h⟩ :=
dif_neg h
@[simp]
theorem coe_div {I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hJ : J ≠ 0) :
(↑(I / J) : Submodule R₁ K) = ↑I / (↑J : Submodule R₁ K) :=
congr_arg _ (dif_neg hJ)
theorem mem_div_iff_of_nonzero {I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (h : J ≠ 0) {x} :
x ∈ I / J ↔ ∀ y ∈ J, x * y ∈ I := by
rw [div_nonzero h]
exact Submodule.mem_div_iff_forall_mul_mem
theorem mul_one_div_le_one {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I * (1 / I) ≤ 1 := by
by_cases hI : I = 0
· rw [hI, div_zero, mul_zero]
exact zero_le 1
· rw [← coe_le_coe, coe_mul, coe_div hI, coe_one]
apply Submodule.mul_one_div_le_one
theorem le_self_mul_one_div {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hI : I ≤ (1 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)) :
I ≤ I * (1 / I) := by
by_cases hI_nz : I = 0
· rw [hI_nz, div_zero, mul_zero]
· rw [← coe_le_coe, coe_mul, coe_div hI_nz, coe_one]
rw [← coe_le_coe, coe_one] at hI
exact Submodule.le_self_mul_one_div hI
theorem le_div_iff_of_nonzero {I J J' : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hJ' : J' ≠ 0) :
I ≤ J / J' ↔ ∀ x ∈ I, ∀ y ∈ J', x * y ∈ J :=
⟨fun h _ hx => (mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hJ').mp (h hx), fun h x hx =>
(mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hJ').mpr (h x hx)⟩
theorem le_div_iff_mul_le {I J J' : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hJ' : J' ≠ 0) :
I ≤ J / J' ↔ I * J' ≤ J := by
rw [div_nonzero hJ']
-- Porting note: this used to be { convert; rw }, flipped the order.
rw [← coe_le_coe (I := I * J') (J := J), coe_mul]
exact Submodule.le_div_iff_mul_le
@[simp]
theorem div_one {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I / 1 = I := by
rw [div_nonzero (one_ne_zero' (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K))]
ext
constructor <;> intro h
· simpa using mem_div_iff_forall_mul_mem.mp h 1 ((algebraMap R₁ K).map_one ▸ coe_mem_one R₁⁰ 1)
· apply mem_div_iff_forall_mul_mem.mpr
rintro y ⟨y', _, rfl⟩
-- Porting note: this used to be { convert; rw }, flipped the order.
rw [mul_comm, Algebra.linearMap_apply, ← Algebra.smul_def]
exact Submodule.smul_mem _ y' h
theorem eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_right (I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : I * J = 1) :
J = 1 / I := by
have hI : I ≠ 0 := ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one I J h
suffices h' : I * (1 / I) = 1 from
congr_arg Units.inv <| @Units.ext _ _ (Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ h) (Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ h') rfl
apply le_antisymm
· apply mul_le.mpr _
intro x hx y hy
rw [mul_comm]
exact (mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hI).mp hy x hx
rw [← h]
apply mul_left_mono I
apply (le_div_iff_of_nonzero hI).mpr _
intro y hy x hx
rw [mul_comm]
exact mul_mem_mul hy hx
theorem mul_div_self_cancel_iff {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I * (1 / I) = 1 ↔ ∃ J, I * J = 1 :=
⟨fun h => ⟨1 / I, h⟩, fun ⟨J, hJ⟩ => by rwa [← eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_right I J hJ]⟩
variable {K' : Type*} [Field K'] [Algebra R₁ K'] [IsFractionRing R₁ K']
@[simp]
protected theorem map_div (I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : K ≃ₐ[R₁] K') :
(I / J).map (h : K →ₐ[R₁] K') = I.map h / J.map h := by
by_cases H : J = 0
· rw [H, div_zero, FractionalIdeal.map_zero, div_zero]
· -- Porting note: `simp` wouldn't apply these lemmas so do them manually using `rw`
rw [← coeToSubmodule_inj, div_nonzero H, div_nonzero (map_ne_zero _ H)]
simp [Submodule.map_div]
-- Porting note: doesn't need to be @[simp] because this follows from `map_one` and `map_div`
theorem map_one_div (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : K ≃ₐ[R₁] K') :
(1 / I).map (h : K →ₐ[R₁] K') = 1 / I.map h := by
rw [FractionalIdeal.map_div, FractionalIdeal.map_one]
end Quotient
section Field
variable {R₁ K L : Type*} [CommRing R₁] [Field K] [Field L]
variable [Algebra R₁ K] [IsFractionRing R₁ K] [Algebra K L] [IsFractionRing K L]
theorem eq_zero_or_one (I : FractionalIdeal K⁰ L) : I = 0 ∨ I = 1 := by
rw [or_iff_not_imp_left]
intro hI
simp_rw [@SetLike.ext_iff _ _ _ I 1, mem_one_iff]
intro x
constructor
· intro x_mem
obtain ⟨n, d, rfl⟩ := IsLocalization.mk'_surjective K⁰ x
refine ⟨n / d, ?_⟩
rw [map_div₀, IsFractionRing.mk'_eq_div]
· rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨y, y_ne, y_mem⟩ := exists_ne_zero_mem_isInteger hI
rw [← div_mul_cancel₀ x y_ne, RingHom.map_mul, ← Algebra.smul_def]
exact smul_mem (M := L) I (x / y) y_mem
theorem eq_zero_or_one_of_isField (hF : IsField R₁) (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) : I = 0 ∨ I = 1 :=
letI : Field R₁ := hF.toField
eq_zero_or_one I
end Field
section PrincipalIdeal
variable {R₁ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] {K : Type*} [Field K]
variable [Algebra R₁ K] [IsFractionRing R₁ K]
variable (R₁)
/-- `FractionalIdeal.span_finset R₁ s f` is the fractional ideal of `R₁` generated by `f '' s`. -/
-- Porting note: `@[simps]` generated a `Subtype.val` coercion instead of a
-- `FractionalIdeal.coeToSubmodule` coercion
def spanFinset {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → K) : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K :=
⟨Submodule.span R₁ (f '' s), by
obtain ⟨a', ha'⟩ := IsLocalization.exist_integer_multiples R₁⁰ s f
refine ⟨a', a'.2, fun x hx => Submodule.span_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ hx⟩
· rintro _ ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩
exact ha' i hi
· rw [smul_zero]
exact IsLocalization.isInteger_zero
· intro x y _ _ hx hy
rw [smul_add]
exact IsLocalization.isInteger_add hx hy
· intro c x _ hx
rw [smul_comm]
exact IsLocalization.isInteger_smul hx⟩
@[simp] lemma spanFinset_coe {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → K) :
(spanFinset R₁ s f : Submodule R₁ K) = Submodule.span R₁ (f '' s) :=
| rfl
| Mathlib/RingTheory/FractionalIdeal/Operations.lean | 534 | 535 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Pi
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Order.UpperLower
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Sequences
/-!
# Upper/lower/order-connected sets in normed groups
The topological closure and interior of an upper/lower/order-connected set is an
upper/lower/order-connected set (with the notable exception of the closure of an order-connected
set).
We also prove lemmas specific to `ℝⁿ`. Those are helpful to prove that order-connected sets in `ℝⁿ`
are measurable.
## TODO
Is there a way to generalise `IsClosed.upperClosure_pi`/`IsClosed.lowerClosure_pi` so that they also
apply to `ℝ`, `ℝ × ℝ`, `EuclideanSpace ι ℝ`? `_pi` has been appended to their names to disambiguate
from the other possible lemmas, but we will want there to be a single set of lemmas for all
situations.
-/
open Bornology Function Metric Set
open scoped Pointwise
variable {α ι : Type*}
section NormedOrderedGroup
variable [NormedCommGroup α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α] {s : Set α}
@[to_additive IsUpperSet.thickening]
protected theorem IsUpperSet.thickening' (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ε : ℝ) :
IsUpperSet (thickening ε s) := by
rw [← ball_mul_one]
exact hs.mul_left
@[to_additive IsLowerSet.thickening]
protected theorem IsLowerSet.thickening' (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ε : ℝ) :
IsLowerSet (thickening ε s) := by
rw [← ball_mul_one]
exact hs.mul_left
@[to_additive IsUpperSet.cthickening]
protected theorem IsUpperSet.cthickening' (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ε : ℝ) :
IsUpperSet (cthickening ε s) := by
rw [cthickening_eq_iInter_thickening'']
exact isUpperSet_iInter₂ fun δ _ => hs.thickening' _
@[to_additive IsLowerSet.cthickening]
| protected theorem IsLowerSet.cthickening' (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ε : ℝ) :
IsLowerSet (cthickening ε s) := by
rw [cthickening_eq_iInter_thickening'']
exact isLowerSet_iInter₂ fun δ _ => hs.thickening' _
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Order/UpperLower.lean | 58 | 61 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn, Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Arithmetic
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.FixedPoint
/-!
# Cofinality
This file contains the definition of cofinality of an order and an ordinal number.
## Main Definitions
* `Order.cof r` is the cofinality of a reflexive order. This is the smallest cardinality of a subset
`s` that is *cofinal*, i.e. `∀ x, ∃ y ∈ s, r x y`.
* `Ordinal.cof o` is the cofinality of the ordinal `o` when viewed as a linear order.
## Main Statements
* `Cardinal.lt_power_cof`: A consequence of König's theorem stating that `c < c ^ c.ord.cof` for
`c ≥ ℵ₀`.
## Implementation Notes
* The cofinality is defined for ordinals.
If `c` is a cardinal number, its cofinality is `c.ord.cof`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Order
open scoped Ordinal
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
/-! ### Cofinality of orders -/
attribute [local instance] IsRefl.swap
namespace Order
/-- Cofinality of a reflexive order `≼`. This is the smallest cardinality
of a subset `S : Set α` such that `∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, a ≼ b`. -/
def cof (r : α → α → Prop) : Cardinal :=
sInf { c | ∃ S : Set α, (∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, r a b) ∧ #S = c }
/-- The set in the definition of `Order.cof` is nonempty. -/
private theorem cof_nonempty (r : α → α → Prop) [IsRefl α r] :
{ c | ∃ S : Set α, (∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, r a b) ∧ #S = c }.Nonempty :=
⟨_, Set.univ, fun a => ⟨a, ⟨⟩, refl _⟩, rfl⟩
theorem cof_le (r : α → α → Prop) {S : Set α} (h : ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, r a b) : cof r ≤ #S :=
csInf_le' ⟨S, h, rfl⟩
theorem le_cof [IsRefl α r] (c : Cardinal) :
c ≤ cof r ↔ ∀ {S : Set α}, (∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, r a b) → c ≤ #S := by
rw [cof, le_csInf_iff'' (cof_nonempty r)]
use fun H S h => H _ ⟨S, h, rfl⟩
rintro H d ⟨S, h, rfl⟩
exact H h
end Order
namespace RelIso
private theorem cof_le_lift [IsRefl β s] (f : r ≃r s) :
Cardinal.lift.{v} (Order.cof r) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{u} (Order.cof s) := by
rw [Order.cof, Order.cof, lift_sInf, lift_sInf, le_csInf_iff'' ((Order.cof_nonempty s).image _)]
rintro - ⟨-, ⟨u, H, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
apply csInf_le'
refine ⟨_, ⟨f.symm '' u, fun a => ?_, rfl⟩, lift_mk_eq'.2 ⟨(f.symm.toEquiv.image u).symm⟩⟩
rcases H (f a) with ⟨b, hb, hb'⟩
refine ⟨f.symm b, mem_image_of_mem _ hb, f.map_rel_iff.1 ?_⟩
rwa [RelIso.apply_symm_apply]
theorem cof_eq_lift [IsRefl β s] (f : r ≃r s) :
Cardinal.lift.{v} (Order.cof r) = Cardinal.lift.{u} (Order.cof s) :=
have := f.toRelEmbedding.isRefl
(f.cof_le_lift).antisymm (f.symm.cof_le_lift)
theorem cof_eq {α β : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} {s} [IsRefl β s] (f : r ≃r s) :
Order.cof r = Order.cof s :=
lift_inj.1 (f.cof_eq_lift)
end RelIso
/-! ### Cofinality of ordinals -/
namespace Ordinal
/-- Cofinality of an ordinal. This is the smallest cardinal of a subset `S` of the ordinal which is
unbounded, in the sense `∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, a ≤ b`.
In particular, `cof 0 = 0` and `cof (succ o) = 1`. -/
def cof (o : Ordinal.{u}) : Cardinal.{u} :=
o.liftOn (fun a ↦ Order.cof (swap a.rᶜ)) fun _ _ ⟨f⟩ ↦ f.compl.swap.cof_eq
theorem cof_type (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : (type r).cof = Order.cof (swap rᶜ) :=
rfl
theorem cof_type_lt [LinearOrder α] [IsWellOrder α (· < ·)] :
(@type α (· < ·) _).cof = @Order.cof α (· ≤ ·) := by
rw [cof_type, compl_lt, swap_ge]
theorem cof_eq_cof_toType (o : Ordinal) : o.cof = @Order.cof o.toType (· ≤ ·) := by
conv_lhs => rw [← type_toType o, cof_type_lt]
theorem le_cof_type [IsWellOrder α r] {c} : c ≤ cof (type r) ↔ ∀ S, Unbounded r S → c ≤ #S :=
(le_csInf_iff'' (Order.cof_nonempty _)).trans
⟨fun H S h => H _ ⟨S, h, rfl⟩, by
rintro H d ⟨S, h, rfl⟩
exact H _ h⟩
theorem cof_type_le [IsWellOrder α r] {S : Set α} (h : Unbounded r S) : cof (type r) ≤ #S :=
le_cof_type.1 le_rfl S h
theorem lt_cof_type [IsWellOrder α r] {S : Set α} : #S < cof (type r) → Bounded r S := by
simpa using not_imp_not.2 cof_type_le
theorem cof_eq (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : ∃ S, Unbounded r S ∧ #S = cof (type r) :=
csInf_mem (Order.cof_nonempty (swap rᶜ))
theorem ord_cof_eq (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] :
∃ S, Unbounded r S ∧ type (Subrel r (· ∈ S)) = (cof (type r)).ord := by
let ⟨S, hS, e⟩ := cof_eq r
let ⟨s, _, e'⟩ := Cardinal.ord_eq S
let T : Set α := { a | ∃ aS : a ∈ S, ∀ b : S, s b ⟨_, aS⟩ → r b a }
suffices Unbounded r T by
refine ⟨T, this, le_antisymm ?_ (Cardinal.ord_le.2 <| cof_type_le this)⟩
rw [← e, e']
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone
(fun a : T =>
(⟨a,
let ⟨aS, _⟩ := a.2
aS⟩ :
S))
fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
rcases a with ⟨a, aS, ha⟩
rcases b with ⟨b, bS, hb⟩
change s ⟨a, _⟩ ⟨b, _⟩
refine ((trichotomous_of s _ _).resolve_left fun hn => ?_).resolve_left ?_
· exact asymm h (ha _ hn)
· intro e
injection e with e
subst b
exact irrefl _ h
intro a
have : { b : S | ¬r b a }.Nonempty :=
let ⟨b, bS, ba⟩ := hS a
⟨⟨b, bS⟩, ba⟩
let b := (IsWellFounded.wf : WellFounded s).min _ this
have ba : ¬r b a := IsWellFounded.wf.min_mem _ this
refine ⟨b, ⟨b.2, fun c => not_imp_not.1 fun h => ?_⟩, ba⟩
rw [show ∀ b : S, (⟨b, b.2⟩ : S) = b by intro b; cases b; rfl]
exact IsWellFounded.wf.not_lt_min _ this (IsOrderConnected.neg_trans h ba)
/-! ### Cofinality of suprema and least strict upper bounds -/
private theorem card_mem_cof {o} : ∃ (ι : _) (f : ι → Ordinal), lsub.{u, u} f = o ∧ #ι = o.card :=
⟨_, _, lsub_typein o, mk_toType o⟩
/-- The set in the `lsub` characterization of `cof` is nonempty. -/
theorem cof_lsub_def_nonempty (o) :
{ a : Cardinal | ∃ (ι : _) (f : ι → Ordinal), lsub.{u, u} f = o ∧ #ι = a }.Nonempty :=
⟨_, card_mem_cof⟩
theorem cof_eq_sInf_lsub (o : Ordinal.{u}) : cof o =
sInf { a : Cardinal | ∃ (ι : Type u) (f : ι → Ordinal), lsub.{u, u} f = o ∧ #ι = a } := by
refine le_antisymm (le_csInf (cof_lsub_def_nonempty o) ?_) (csInf_le' ?_)
· rintro a ⟨ι, f, hf, rfl⟩
rw [← type_toType o]
refine
(cof_type_le fun a => ?_).trans
(@mk_le_of_injective _ _
(fun s : typein ((· < ·) : o.toType → o.toType → Prop) ⁻¹' Set.range f =>
Classical.choose s.prop)
fun s t hst => by
let H := congr_arg f hst
rwa [Classical.choose_spec s.prop, Classical.choose_spec t.prop, typein_inj,
Subtype.coe_inj] at H)
have := typein_lt_self a
simp_rw [← hf, lt_lsub_iff] at this
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := this
refine ⟨enum (α := o.toType) (· < ·) ⟨f i, ?_⟩, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [type_toType, ← hf]
apply lt_lsub
· rw [mem_preimage, typein_enum]
exact mem_range_self i
· rwa [← typein_le_typein, typein_enum]
· rcases cof_eq (α := o.toType) (· < ·) with ⟨S, hS, hS'⟩
let f : S → Ordinal := fun s => typein LT.lt s.val
refine ⟨S, f, le_antisymm (lsub_le fun i => typein_lt_self (o := o) i)
(le_of_forall_lt fun a ha => ?_), by rwa [type_toType o] at hS'⟩
rw [← type_toType o] at ha
rcases hS (enum (· < ·) ⟨a, ha⟩) with ⟨b, hb, hb'⟩
rw [← typein_le_typein, typein_enum] at hb'
exact hb'.trans_lt (lt_lsub.{u, u} f ⟨b, hb⟩)
@[simp]
theorem lift_cof (o) : Cardinal.lift.{u, v} (cof o) = cof (Ordinal.lift.{u, v} o) := by
refine inductionOn o fun α r _ ↦ ?_
rw [← type_uLift, cof_type, cof_type, ← Cardinal.lift_id'.{v, u} (Order.cof _),
← Cardinal.lift_umax]
apply RelIso.cof_eq_lift ⟨Equiv.ulift.symm, _⟩
simp [swap]
theorem cof_le_card (o) : cof o ≤ card o := by
rw [cof_eq_sInf_lsub]
exact csInf_le' card_mem_cof
theorem cof_ord_le (c : Cardinal) : c.ord.cof ≤ c := by simpa using cof_le_card c.ord
theorem ord_cof_le (o : Ordinal.{u}) : o.cof.ord ≤ o :=
(ord_le_ord.2 (cof_le_card o)).trans (ord_card_le o)
theorem exists_lsub_cof (o : Ordinal) :
∃ (ι : _) (f : ι → Ordinal), lsub.{u, u} f = o ∧ #ι = cof o := by
rw [cof_eq_sInf_lsub]
exact csInf_mem (cof_lsub_def_nonempty o)
theorem cof_lsub_le {ι} (f : ι → Ordinal) : cof (lsub.{u, u} f) ≤ #ι := by
rw [cof_eq_sInf_lsub]
exact csInf_le' ⟨ι, f, rfl, rfl⟩
theorem cof_lsub_le_lift {ι} (f : ι → Ordinal) :
cof (lsub.{u, v} f) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v, u} #ι := by
rw [← mk_uLift.{u, v}]
convert cof_lsub_le.{max u v} fun i : ULift.{v, u} ι => f i.down
exact
lsub_eq_of_range_eq.{u, max u v, max u v}
(Set.ext fun x => ⟨fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨ULift.up.{v, u} i, hi⟩, fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨_, hi⟩⟩)
theorem le_cof_iff_lsub {o : Ordinal} {a : Cardinal} :
a ≤ cof o ↔ ∀ {ι} (f : ι → Ordinal), lsub.{u, u} f = o → a ≤ #ι := by
rw [cof_eq_sInf_lsub]
exact
(le_csInf_iff'' (cof_lsub_def_nonempty o)).trans
⟨fun H ι f hf => H _ ⟨ι, f, hf, rfl⟩, fun H b ⟨ι, f, hf, hb⟩ => by
rw [← hb]
exact H _ hf⟩
theorem lsub_lt_ord_lift {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal} {c : Ordinal}
(hι : Cardinal.lift.{v, u} #ι < c.cof)
(hf : ∀ i, f i < c) : lsub.{u, v} f < c :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (lsub_le hf) fun h => by
subst h
exact (cof_lsub_le_lift.{u, v} f).not_lt hι
theorem lsub_lt_ord {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal} {c : Ordinal} (hι : #ι < c.cof) :
(∀ i, f i < c) → lsub.{u, u} f < c :=
lsub_lt_ord_lift (by rwa [(#ι).lift_id])
theorem cof_iSup_le_lift {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal} (H : ∀ i, f i < iSup f) :
cof (iSup f) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v, u} #ι := by
rw [← Ordinal.sup] at *
rw [← sup_eq_lsub_iff_lt_sup.{u, v}] at H
rw [H]
exact cof_lsub_le_lift f
theorem cof_iSup_le {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal} (H : ∀ i, f i < iSup f) :
cof (iSup f) ≤ #ι := by
rw [← (#ι).lift_id]
exact cof_iSup_le_lift H
theorem iSup_lt_ord_lift {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal} {c : Ordinal} (hι : Cardinal.lift.{v, u} #ι < c.cof)
(hf : ∀ i, f i < c) : iSup f < c :=
(sup_le_lsub.{u, v} f).trans_lt (lsub_lt_ord_lift hι hf)
theorem iSup_lt_ord {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal} {c : Ordinal} (hι : #ι < c.cof) :
(∀ i, f i < c) → iSup f < c :=
iSup_lt_ord_lift (by rwa [(#ι).lift_id])
theorem iSup_lt_lift {ι} {f : ι → Cardinal} {c : Cardinal}
(hι : Cardinal.lift.{v, u} #ι < c.ord.cof)
(hf : ∀ i, f i < c) : iSup f < c := by
rw [← ord_lt_ord, iSup_ord (Cardinal.bddAbove_range _)]
refine iSup_lt_ord_lift hι fun i => ?_
rw [ord_lt_ord]
apply hf
theorem iSup_lt {ι} {f : ι → Cardinal} {c : Cardinal} (hι : #ι < c.ord.cof) :
(∀ i, f i < c) → iSup f < c :=
iSup_lt_lift (by rwa [(#ι).lift_id])
theorem nfpFamily_lt_ord_lift {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal} {c} (hc : ℵ₀ < cof c)
(hc' : Cardinal.lift.{v, u} #ι < cof c) (hf : ∀ (i), ∀ b < c, f i b < c) {a} (ha : a < c) :
nfpFamily f a < c := by
refine iSup_lt_ord_lift ((Cardinal.lift_le.2 (mk_list_le_max ι)).trans_lt ?_) fun l => ?_
· rw [lift_max]
apply max_lt _ hc'
rwa [Cardinal.lift_aleph0]
· induction' l with i l H
· exact ha
· exact hf _ _ H
theorem nfpFamily_lt_ord {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal} {c} (hc : ℵ₀ < cof c) (hc' : #ι < cof c)
(hf : ∀ (i), ∀ b < c, f i b < c) {a} : a < c → nfpFamily.{u, u} f a < c :=
nfpFamily_lt_ord_lift hc (by rwa [(#ι).lift_id]) hf
theorem nfp_lt_ord {f : Ordinal → Ordinal} {c} (hc : ℵ₀ < cof c) (hf : ∀ i < c, f i < c) {a} :
a < c → nfp f a < c :=
nfpFamily_lt_ord_lift hc (by simpa using Cardinal.one_lt_aleph0.trans hc) fun _ => hf
theorem exists_blsub_cof (o : Ordinal) :
∃ f : ∀ a < (cof o).ord, Ordinal, blsub.{u, u} _ f = o := by
rcases exists_lsub_cof o with ⟨ι, f, hf, hι⟩
rcases Cardinal.ord_eq ι with ⟨r, hr, hι'⟩
rw [← @blsub_eq_lsub' ι r hr] at hf
rw [← hι, hι']
exact ⟨_, hf⟩
theorem le_cof_iff_blsub {b : Ordinal} {a : Cardinal} :
a ≤ cof b ↔ ∀ {o} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal), blsub.{u, u} o f = b → a ≤ o.card :=
le_cof_iff_lsub.trans
⟨fun H o f hf => by simpa using H _ hf, fun H ι f hf => by
rcases Cardinal.ord_eq ι with ⟨r, hr, hι'⟩
rw [← @blsub_eq_lsub' ι r hr] at hf
simpa using H _ hf⟩
theorem cof_blsub_le_lift {o} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal) :
cof (blsub.{u, v} o f) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v, u} o.card := by
rw [← mk_toType o]
exact cof_lsub_le_lift _
theorem cof_blsub_le {o} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal) : cof (blsub.{u, u} o f) ≤ o.card := by
rw [← o.card.lift_id]
exact cof_blsub_le_lift f
theorem blsub_lt_ord_lift {o : Ordinal.{u}} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal} {c : Ordinal}
(ho : Cardinal.lift.{v, u} o.card < c.cof) (hf : ∀ i hi, f i hi < c) : blsub.{u, v} o f < c :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (blsub_le hf) fun h =>
ho.not_le (by simpa [← iSup_ord, hf, h] using cof_blsub_le_lift.{u, v} f)
theorem blsub_lt_ord {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal} {c : Ordinal} (ho : o.card < c.cof)
(hf : ∀ i hi, f i hi < c) : blsub.{u, u} o f < c :=
blsub_lt_ord_lift (by rwa [o.card.lift_id]) hf
theorem cof_bsup_le_lift {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal} (H : ∀ i h, f i h < bsup.{u, v} o f) :
cof (bsup.{u, v} o f) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v, u} o.card := by
rw [← bsup_eq_blsub_iff_lt_bsup.{u, v}] at H
rw [H]
| exact cof_blsub_le_lift.{u, v} f
theorem cof_bsup_le {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal} :
(∀ i h, f i h < bsup.{u, u} o f) → cof (bsup.{u, u} o f) ≤ o.card := by
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Cofinality.lean | 347 | 350 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Fourier.FourierTransform
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Dual
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.EuclideanDist
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ContinuousMapDense
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Integral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.Set
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Paracompact
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.Unique
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.WeakDual
/-!
# The Riemann-Lebesgue Lemma
In this file we prove the Riemann-Lebesgue lemma, for functions on finite-dimensional real vector
spaces `V`: if `f` is a function on `V` (valued in a complete normed space `E`), then the
Fourier transform of `f`, viewed as a function on the dual space of `V`, tends to 0 along the
cocompact filter. Here the Fourier transform is defined by
`fun w : V →L[ℝ] ℝ ↦ ∫ (v : V), exp (↑(2 * π * w v) * I) • f v`.
This is true for arbitrary functions, but is only interesting for `L¹` functions (if `f` is not
integrable then the integral is zero for all `w`). This is proved first for continuous
compactly-supported functions on inner-product spaces; then we pass to arbitrary functions using the
density of continuous compactly-supported functions in `L¹` space. Finally we generalise from
inner-product spaces to arbitrary finite-dimensional spaces, by choosing a continuous linear
equivalence to an inner-product space.
## Main results
- `tendsto_integral_exp_inner_smul_cocompact` : for `V` a finite-dimensional real inner product
space and `f : V → E`, the function `fun w : V ↦ ∫ v : V, exp (2 * π * ⟪w, v⟫ * I) • f v`
tends to 0 along `cocompact V`.
- `tendsto_integral_exp_smul_cocompact` : for `V` a finite-dimensional real vector space (endowed
with its unique Hausdorff topological vector space structure), and `W` the dual of `V`, the
function `fun w : W ↦ ∫ v : V, exp (2 * π * w v * I) • f v` tends to along `cocompact W`.
- `Real.tendsto_integral_exp_smul_cocompact`: special case of functions on `ℝ`.
- `Real.zero_at_infty_fourierIntegral` and `Real.zero_at_infty_vector_fourierIntegral`:
reformulations explicitly using the Fourier integral.
-/
noncomputable section
open MeasureTheory Filter Complex Set Module
open scoped Filter Topology Real ENNReal FourierTransform RealInnerProductSpace NNReal
variable {E V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E] {f : V → E}
section InnerProductSpace
variable [NormedAddCommGroup V] [MeasurableSpace V] [BorelSpace V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V]
[FiniteDimensional ℝ V]
local notation3 "i" => fun (w : V) => (1 / (2 * ‖w‖ ^ 2) : ℝ) • w
/-- Shifting `f` by `(1 / (2 * ‖w‖ ^ 2)) • w` negates the integral in the Riemann-Lebesgue lemma. -/
theorem fourierIntegral_half_period_translate {w : V} (hw : w ≠ 0) :
(∫ v : V, 𝐞 (-⟪v, w⟫) • f (v + i w)) = -∫ v : V, 𝐞 (-⟪v, w⟫) • f v := by
have hiw : ⟪i w, w⟫ = 1 / 2 := by
rw [inner_smul_left, inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, RCLike.ofReal_real_eq_id, id,
RCLike.conj_to_real, ← div_div, div_mul_cancel₀]
rwa [Ne, sq_eq_zero_iff, norm_eq_zero]
have :
(fun v : V => 𝐞 (-⟪v, w⟫) • f (v + i w)) =
fun v : V => (fun x : V => -(𝐞 (-⟪x, w⟫) • f x)) (v + i w) := by
ext1 v
simp_rw [inner_add_left, hiw, Circle.smul_def, Real.fourierChar_apply, neg_add, mul_add,
ofReal_add, add_mul, exp_add]
have : 2 * π * -(1 / 2) = -π := by field_simp; ring
rw [this, ofReal_neg, neg_mul, exp_neg, exp_pi_mul_I, inv_neg, inv_one, mul_neg_one, neg_smul,
neg_neg]
rw [this]
-- Porting note:
-- The next three lines had just been
-- rw [integral_add_right_eq_self (fun (x : V) ↦ -(𝐞[-⟪x, w⟫]) • f x)
-- ((fun w ↦ (1 / (2 * ‖w‖ ^ (2 : ℕ))) • w) w)]
-- Unfortunately now we need to specify `volume`.
have := integral_add_right_eq_self (μ := volume) (fun (x : V) ↦ -(𝐞 (-⟪x, w⟫) • f x))
((fun w ↦ (1 / (2 * ‖w‖ ^ (2 : ℕ))) • w) w)
rw [this]
simp only [neg_smul, integral_neg]
/-- Rewrite the Fourier integral in a form that allows us to use uniform continuity. -/
theorem fourierIntegral_eq_half_sub_half_period_translate {w : V} (hw : w ≠ 0)
(hf : Integrable f) :
∫ v : V, 𝐞 (-⟪v, w⟫) • f v = (1 / (2 : ℂ)) • ∫ v : V, 𝐞 (-⟪v, w⟫) • (f v - f (v + i w)) := by
simp_rw [smul_sub]
rw [integral_sub, fourierIntegral_half_period_translate hw, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_neg, ←
two_smul ℂ _, ← @smul_assoc _ _ _ _ _ _ (IsScalarTower.left ℂ), smul_eq_mul]
· norm_num
exacts [(Real.fourierIntegral_convergent_iff w).2 hf,
(Real.fourierIntegral_convergent_iff w).2 (hf.comp_add_right _)]
/-- Riemann-Lebesgue Lemma for continuous and compactly-supported functions: the integral
`∫ v, exp (-2 * π * ⟪w, v⟫ * I) • f v` tends to 0 wrt `cocompact V`. Note that this is primarily
of interest as a preparatory step for the more general result
`tendsto_integral_exp_inner_smul_cocompact` in which `f` can be arbitrary. -/
theorem tendsto_integral_exp_inner_smul_cocompact_of_continuous_compact_support (hf1 : Continuous f)
(hf2 : HasCompactSupport f) :
Tendsto (fun w : V => ∫ v : V, 𝐞 (-⟪v, w⟫) • f v) (cocompact V) (𝓝 0) := by
refine NormedAddCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_zero.mpr fun ε hε => ?_
suffices ∃ T : ℝ, ∀ w : V, T ≤ ‖w‖ → ‖∫ v : V, 𝐞 (-⟪v, w⟫) • f v‖ < ε by
simp_rw [← comap_dist_left_atTop_eq_cocompact (0 : V), eventually_comap, eventually_atTop,
dist_eq_norm', sub_zero]
exact
let ⟨T, hT⟩ := this
⟨T, fun b hb v hv => hT v (hv.symm ▸ hb)⟩
obtain ⟨R, -, hR_bd⟩ : ∃ R : ℝ, 0 < R ∧ ∀ x : V, R ≤ ‖x‖ → f x = 0 := hf2.exists_pos_le_norm
let A := {v : V | ‖v‖ ≤ R + 1}
have mA : MeasurableSet A := by
suffices A = Metric.closedBall (0 : V) (R + 1) by
rw [this]
exact Metric.isClosed_closedBall.measurableSet
simp_rw [A, Metric.closedBall, dist_eq_norm, sub_zero]
obtain ⟨B, hB_pos, hB_vol⟩ : ∃ B : ℝ≥0, 0 < B ∧ volume A ≤ B := by
have hc : IsCompact A := by
simpa only [Metric.closedBall, dist_eq_norm, sub_zero] using isCompact_closedBall (0 : V) _
let B₀ := volume A
replace hc : B₀ < ⊤ := hc.measure_lt_top
refine ⟨B₀.toNNReal + 1, add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos B₀.toNNReal.coe_nonneg one_pos, ?_⟩
rw [ENNReal.coe_add, ENNReal.coe_one, ENNReal.coe_toNNReal hc.ne]
exact le_self_add
--* Use uniform continuity to choose δ such that `‖x - y‖ < δ` implies `‖f x - f y‖ < ε / B`.
obtain ⟨δ, hδ1, hδ2⟩ :=
Metric.uniformContinuous_iff.mp (hf2.uniformContinuous_of_continuous hf1) (ε / B)
(div_pos hε hB_pos)
refine ⟨1 / 2 + 1 / (2 * δ), fun w hw_bd => ?_⟩
have hw_ne : w ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! hw_bd; rw [hw_bd, norm_zero]
exact add_pos one_half_pos (one_div_pos.mpr <| mul_pos two_pos hδ1)
have hw'_nm : ‖i w‖ = 1 / (2 * ‖w‖) := by
rw [norm_smul, norm_div, Real.norm_of_nonneg (mul_nonneg two_pos.le <| sq_nonneg _), norm_one,
sq, ← div_div, ← div_div, ← div_div, div_mul_cancel₀ _ (norm_eq_zero.not.mpr hw_ne)]
--* Rewrite integral in terms of `f v - f (v + w')`.
have : ‖(1 / 2 : ℂ)‖ = 2⁻¹ := by norm_num
rw [fourierIntegral_eq_half_sub_half_period_translate hw_ne
(hf1.integrable_of_hasCompactSupport hf2),
norm_smul, this, inv_mul_eq_div, div_lt_iff₀' two_pos]
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (norm_integral_le_integral_norm _) ?_
simp_rw [Circle.norm_smul]
--* Show integral can be taken over A only.
have int_A : ∫ v : V, ‖f v - f (v + i w)‖ = ∫ v in A, ‖f v - f (v + i w)‖ := by
refine (setIntegral_eq_integral_of_forall_compl_eq_zero fun v hv => ?_).symm
dsimp only [A] at hv
simp only [mem_setOf, not_le] at hv
rw [hR_bd v _, hR_bd (v + i w) _, sub_zero, norm_zero]
· rw [← sub_neg_eq_add]
refine le_trans ?_ (norm_sub_norm_le _ _)
rw [le_sub_iff_add_le, norm_neg]
refine le_trans ?_ hv.le
rw [add_le_add_iff_left, hw'_nm, ← div_div]
refine (div_le_one <| norm_pos_iff.mpr hw_ne).mpr ?_
refine le_trans (le_add_of_nonneg_right <| one_div_nonneg.mpr <| ?_) hw_bd
exact (mul_pos (zero_lt_two' ℝ) hδ1).le
· exact (le_add_of_nonneg_right zero_le_one).trans hv.le
rw [int_A]; clear int_A
--* Bound integral using fact that `‖f v - f (v + w')‖` is small.
have bdA : ∀ v : V, v ∈ A → ‖‖f v - f (v + i w)‖‖ ≤ ε / B := by
simp_rw [norm_norm]
simp_rw [dist_eq_norm] at hδ2
refine fun x _ => (hδ2 ?_).le
rw [sub_add_cancel_left, norm_neg, hw'_nm, ← div_div, div_lt_iff₀ (norm_pos_iff.mpr hw_ne), ←
div_lt_iff₀' hδ1, div_div]
exact (lt_add_of_pos_left _ one_half_pos).trans_le hw_bd
have bdA2 := norm_setIntegral_le_of_norm_le_const (hB_vol.trans_lt ENNReal.coe_lt_top) bdA
have : ‖_‖ = ∫ v : V in A, ‖f v - f (v + i w)‖ :=
Real.norm_of_nonneg (setIntegral_nonneg mA fun x _ => norm_nonneg _)
rw [this] at bdA2
refine bdA2.trans_lt ?_
rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, div_lt_iff₀ (NNReal.coe_pos.mpr hB_pos), mul_comm (2 : ℝ), mul_assoc,
mul_lt_mul_left hε]
refine (ENNReal.toReal_mono ENNReal.coe_ne_top hB_vol).trans_lt ?_
rw [ENNReal.coe_toReal, two_mul]
exact lt_add_of_pos_left _ hB_pos
variable (f)
/-- Riemann-Lebesgue lemma for functions on a real inner-product space: the integral
`∫ v, exp (-2 * π * ⟪w, v⟫ * I) • f v` tends to 0 as `w → ∞`. -/
theorem tendsto_integral_exp_inner_smul_cocompact :
Tendsto (fun w : V => ∫ v, 𝐞 (-⟪v, w⟫) • f v) (cocompact V) (𝓝 0) := by
by_cases hfi : Integrable f; swap
· convert tendsto_const_nhds (x := (0 : E)) with w
apply integral_undef
rwa [Real.fourierIntegral_convergent_iff]
refine Metric.tendsto_nhds.mpr fun ε hε => ?_
obtain ⟨g, hg_supp, hfg, hg_cont, -⟩ :=
hfi.exists_hasCompactSupport_integral_sub_le (div_pos hε two_pos)
refine
((Metric.tendsto_nhds.mp
(tendsto_integral_exp_inner_smul_cocompact_of_continuous_compact_support hg_cont
hg_supp))
_ (div_pos hε two_pos)).mp
(Eventually.of_forall fun w hI => ?_)
rw [dist_eq_norm] at hI ⊢
have : ‖(∫ v, 𝐞 (-⟪v, w⟫) • f v) - ∫ v, 𝐞 (-⟪v, w⟫) • g v‖ ≤ ε / 2 := by
refine le_trans ?_ hfg
simp_rw [← integral_sub ((Real.fourierIntegral_convergent_iff w).2 hfi)
((Real.fourierIntegral_convergent_iff w).2 (hg_cont.integrable_of_hasCompactSupport hg_supp)),
← smul_sub, ← Pi.sub_apply]
exact VectorFourier.norm_fourierIntegral_le_integral_norm 𝐞 _ bilinFormOfRealInner (f - g) w
replace := add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt this hI
rw [add_halves] at this
refine ((le_of_eq ?_).trans (norm_add_le _ _)).trans_lt this
simp only [sub_zero, sub_add_cancel]
/-- The Riemann-Lebesgue lemma for functions on `ℝ`. -/
theorem Real.tendsto_integral_exp_smul_cocompact (f : ℝ → E) :
Tendsto (fun w : ℝ => ∫ v : ℝ, 𝐞 (-(v * w)) • f v) (cocompact ℝ) (𝓝 0) := by
simp_rw [mul_comm]
exact tendsto_integral_exp_inner_smul_cocompact f
/-- The Riemann-Lebesgue lemma for functions on `ℝ`, formulated via `Real.fourierIntegral`. -/
theorem Real.zero_at_infty_fourierIntegral (f : ℝ → E) : Tendsto (𝓕 f) (cocompact ℝ) (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_integral_exp_inner_smul_cocompact f
/-- Riemann-Lebesgue lemma for functions on a finite-dimensional inner-product space, formulated
via dual space. **Do not use** -- it is only a stepping stone to
`tendsto_integral_exp_smul_cocompact` where the inner-product-space structure isn't required. -/
theorem tendsto_integral_exp_smul_cocompact_of_inner_product (μ : Measure V) [μ.IsAddHaarMeasure] :
Tendsto (fun w : V →L[ℝ] ℝ => ∫ v, 𝐞 (-w v) • f v ∂μ) (cocompact (V →L[ℝ] ℝ)) (𝓝 0) := by
rw [μ.isAddLeftInvariant_eq_smul volume]
simp_rw [integral_smul_nnreal_measure]
rw [← (smul_zero _ : Measure.addHaarScalarFactor μ volume • (0 : E) = 0)]
apply Tendsto.const_smul
let A := (InnerProductSpace.toDual ℝ V).symm
have : (fun w : V →L[ℝ] ℝ ↦ ∫ v, 𝐞 (-w v) • f v) = (fun w : V ↦ ∫ v, 𝐞 (-⟪v, w⟫) • f v) ∘ A := by
ext1 w
congr 1 with v : 1
rw [← inner_conj_symm, RCLike.conj_to_real, InnerProductSpace.toDual_symm_apply]
rw [this]
exact (tendsto_integral_exp_inner_smul_cocompact f).comp
A.toHomeomorph.toCocompactMap.cocompact_tendsto'
end InnerProductSpace
section NoInnerProduct
|
variable (f) [AddCommGroup V] [TopologicalSpace V] [IsTopologicalAddGroup V] [T2Space V]
[MeasurableSpace V] [BorelSpace V] [Module ℝ V] [ContinuousSMul ℝ V] [FiniteDimensional ℝ V]
/-- Riemann-Lebesgue lemma for functions on a finite-dimensional real vector space, formulated via
dual space. -/
theorem tendsto_integral_exp_smul_cocompact (μ : Measure V) [μ.IsAddHaarMeasure] :
Tendsto (fun w : V →L[ℝ] ℝ => ∫ v, 𝐞 (-w v) • f v ∂μ) (cocompact (V →L[ℝ] ℝ)) (𝓝 0) := by
-- We have already proved the result for inner-product spaces, formulated in a way which doesn't
-- refer to the inner product. So we choose an arbitrary inner-product space isomorphic to V
-- and port the result over from there.
let V' := EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin (finrank ℝ V))
have A : V ≃L[ℝ] V' := toEuclidean
borelize V'
| Mathlib/Analysis/Fourier/RiemannLebesgueLemma.lean | 243 | 256 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Seminorm
import Mathlib.Data.NNReal.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Support
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Real
/-!
# Normed (semi)groups
In this file we define 10 classes:
* `Norm`, `NNNorm`: auxiliary classes endowing a type `α` with a function `norm : α → ℝ`
(notation: `‖x‖`) and `nnnorm : α → ℝ≥0` (notation: `‖x‖₊`), respectively;
* `Seminormed...Group`: A seminormed (additive) (commutative) group is an (additive) (commutative)
group with a norm and a compatible pseudometric space structure:
`∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖` or `∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖`, depending on the group operation.
* `Normed...Group`: A normed (additive) (commutative) group is an (additive) (commutative) group
with a norm and a compatible metric space structure.
We also prove basic properties of (semi)normed groups and provide some instances.
## Notes
The current convention `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` means that the distance is invariant under right
addition, but actions in mathlib are usually from the left. This means we might want to change it to
`dist x y = ‖-x + y‖`.
The normed group hierarchy would lend itself well to a mixin design (that is, having
`SeminormedGroup` and `SeminormedAddGroup` not extend `Group` and `AddGroup`), but we choose not
to for performance concerns.
## Tags
normed group
-/
variable {𝓕 α ι κ E F G : Type*}
open Filter Function Metric Bornology
open ENNReal Filter NNReal Uniformity Pointwise Topology
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `E` with a function `norm : E → ℝ` with notation `‖x‖`. This
class is designed to be extended in more interesting classes specifying the properties of the norm.
-/
@[notation_class]
class Norm (E : Type*) where
/-- the `ℝ`-valued norm function. -/
norm : E → ℝ
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `α` with a function `nnnorm : α → ℝ≥0` with notation `‖x‖₊`. -/
@[notation_class]
class NNNorm (E : Type*) where
/-- the `ℝ≥0`-valued norm function. -/
nnnorm : E → ℝ≥0
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `α` with a function `enorm : α → ℝ≥0∞` with notation `‖x‖ₑ`. -/
@[notation_class]
class ENorm (E : Type*) where
/-- the `ℝ≥0∞`-valued norm function. -/
enorm : E → ℝ≥0∞
export Norm (norm)
export NNNorm (nnnorm)
export ENorm (enorm)
@[inherit_doc] notation "‖" e "‖" => norm e
@[inherit_doc] notation "‖" e "‖₊" => nnnorm e
@[inherit_doc] notation "‖" e "‖ₑ" => enorm e
section ENorm
variable {E : Type*} [NNNorm E] {x : E} {r : ℝ≥0}
instance NNNorm.toENorm : ENorm E where enorm := (‖·‖₊ : E → ℝ≥0∞)
lemma enorm_eq_nnnorm (x : E) : ‖x‖ₑ = ‖x‖₊ := rfl
@[simp] lemma toNNReal_enorm (x : E) : ‖x‖ₑ.toNNReal = ‖x‖₊ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_le_enorm : r ≤ ‖x‖ₑ ↔ r ≤ ‖x‖₊ := by simp [enorm]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma enorm_le_coe : ‖x‖ₑ ≤ r ↔ ‖x‖₊ ≤ r := by simp [enorm]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_lt_enorm : r < ‖x‖ₑ ↔ r < ‖x‖₊ := by simp [enorm]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma enorm_lt_coe : ‖x‖ₑ < r ↔ ‖x‖₊ < r := by simp [enorm]
@[simp] lemma enorm_ne_top : ‖x‖ₑ ≠ ∞ := by simp [enorm]
@[simp] lemma enorm_lt_top : ‖x‖ₑ < ∞ := by simp [enorm]
end ENorm
/-- A type `E` equipped with a continuous map `‖·‖ₑ : E → ℝ≥0∞`
NB. We do not demand that the topology is somehow defined by the enorm:
for ℝ≥0∞ (the motivating example behind this definition), this is not true. -/
class ContinuousENorm (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E] extends ENorm E where
continuous_enorm : Continuous enorm
/-- An enormed monoid is an additive monoid endowed with a continuous enorm. -/
class ENormedAddMonoid (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E] extends ContinuousENorm E, AddMonoid E where
enorm_eq_zero : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ₑ = 0 ↔ x = 0
protected enorm_add_le : ∀ x y : E, ‖x + y‖ₑ ≤ ‖x‖ₑ + ‖y‖ₑ
/-- An enormed monoid is a monoid endowed with a continuous enorm. -/
@[to_additive]
class ENormedMonoid (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E] extends ContinuousENorm E, Monoid E where
enorm_eq_zero : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ₑ = 0 ↔ x = 1
enorm_mul_le : ∀ x y : E, ‖x * y‖ₑ ≤ ‖x‖ₑ + ‖y‖ₑ
/-- An enormed commutative monoid is an additive commutative monoid
endowed with a continuous enorm.
We don't have `ENormedAddCommMonoid` extend `EMetricSpace`, since the canonical instance `ℝ≥0∞`
is not an `EMetricSpace`. This is because `ℝ≥0∞` carries the order topology, which is distinct from
the topology coming from `edist`. -/
class ENormedAddCommMonoid (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E]
extends ENormedAddMonoid E, AddCommMonoid E where
/-- An enormed commutative monoid is a commutative monoid endowed with a continuous enorm. -/
@[to_additive]
class ENormedCommMonoid (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E] extends ENormedMonoid E, CommMonoid E where
/-- A seminormed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
class SeminormedAddGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddGroup E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
/-- A seminormed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a
pseudometric space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class SeminormedGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, Group E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
/-- A normed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` defines a
metric space structure. -/
class NormedAddGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
/-- A normed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a metric
space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class NormedGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, Group E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
/-- A seminormed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
class SeminormedAddCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddCommGroup E,
PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
/-- A seminormed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class SeminormedCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, CommGroup E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
/-- A normed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` defines a
metric space structure. -/
class NormedAddCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddCommGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
/-- A normed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a metric
space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class NormedCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, CommGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedGroup.toSeminormedGroup [NormedGroup E] : SeminormedGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedGroup E› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedCommGroup.toSeminormedCommGroup [NormedCommGroup E] :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedCommGroup E› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) SeminormedCommGroup.toSeminormedGroup [SeminormedCommGroup E] :
SeminormedGroup E :=
{ ‹SeminormedCommGroup E› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedCommGroup.toNormedGroup [NormedCommGroup E] : NormedGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedCommGroup E› with }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a `NormedGroup` from a `SeminormedGroup` satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1`. This
avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when declaring a `NormedGroup`
instance as a special case of a more general `SeminormedGroup` instance. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a `NormedAddGroup` from a `SeminormedAddGroup`
satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 0`. This avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace`
level when declaring a `NormedAddGroup` instance as a special case of a more general
`SeminormedAddGroup` instance."]
abbrev NormedGroup.ofSeparation [SeminormedGroup E] (h : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1) :
NormedGroup E where
dist_eq := ‹SeminormedGroup E›.dist_eq
toMetricSpace :=
{ eq_of_dist_eq_zero := fun hxy =>
div_eq_one.1 <| h _ <| (‹SeminormedGroup E›.dist_eq _ _).symm.trans hxy }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a `NormedCommGroup` from a `SeminormedCommGroup` satisfying
`∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1`. This avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when
declaring a `NormedCommGroup` instance as a special case of a more general `SeminormedCommGroup`
instance. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a `NormedAddCommGroup` from a
`SeminormedAddCommGroup` satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 0`. This avoids having to go back to the
`(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when declaring a `NormedAddCommGroup` instance as a special case
of a more general `SeminormedAddCommGroup` instance."]
abbrev NormedCommGroup.ofSeparation [SeminormedCommGroup E] (h : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ ‹SeminormedCommGroup E›, NormedGroup.ofSeparation h with }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant distance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant distance."]
abbrev SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [Group E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
SeminormedGroup E where
dist_eq x y := by
rw [h₁]; apply le_antisymm
· simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_inv_cancel y] using h₂ _ _ _
· simpa only [div_mul_cancel, one_mul] using h₂ (x / y) 1 y
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [Group E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
SeminormedGroup E where
dist_eq x y := by
rw [h₁]; apply le_antisymm
· simpa only [div_mul_cancel, one_mul] using h₂ (x / y) 1 y
· simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_inv_cancel y] using h₂ _ _ _
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant distance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant distance."]
abbrev NormedGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [Group E] [MetricSpace E] (h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1)
(h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) : NormedGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := eq_of_dist_eq_zero }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev NormedGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [Group E] [MetricSpace E] (h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1)
(h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) : NormedGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := eq_of_dist_eq_zero }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [MetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ NormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [MetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ NormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance and the
pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this instance
creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing
`UniformSpace` instance on `E`). -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance
and the pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this
instance creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly
existing `UniformSpace` instance on `E`)."]
abbrev GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedGroup [Group E] (f : GroupSeminorm E) : SeminormedGroup E where
dist x y := f (x / y)
norm := f
dist_eq _ _ := rfl
dist_self x := by simp only [div_self', map_one_eq_zero]
dist_triangle := le_map_div_add_map_div f
dist_comm := map_div_rev f
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance and the
pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this instance
creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing
`UniformSpace` instance on `E`). -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance
and the pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this
instance creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly
existing `UniformSpace` instance on `E`)."]
abbrev GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedCommGroup [CommGroup E] (f : GroupSeminorm E) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ f.toSeminormedGroup with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric space
structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad definitional
equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace` instance on
`E`). -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric
space structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad
definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace`
instance on `E`)."]
abbrev GroupNorm.toNormedGroup [Group E] (f : GroupNorm E) : NormedGroup E :=
{ f.toGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedGroup with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := fun h => div_eq_one.1 <| eq_one_of_map_eq_zero f h }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric space
structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad definitional
equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace` instance on
`E`). -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric
space structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad
definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace`
instance on `E`)."]
abbrev GroupNorm.toNormedCommGroup [CommGroup E] (f : GroupNorm E) : NormedCommGroup E :=
{ f.toNormedGroup with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
section SeminormedGroup
variable [SeminormedGroup E] [SeminormedGroup F] [SeminormedGroup G] {s : Set E}
{a a₁ a₂ b c : E} {r r₁ r₂ : ℝ}
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_eq_norm_div (a b : E) : dist a b = ‖a / b‖ :=
SeminormedGroup.dist_eq _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_eq_norm_div' (a b : E) : dist a b = ‖b / a‖ := by rw [dist_comm, dist_eq_norm_div]
alias dist_eq_norm := dist_eq_norm_sub
alias dist_eq_norm' := dist_eq_norm_sub'
@[to_additive of_forall_le_norm]
lemma DiscreteTopology.of_forall_le_norm' (hpos : 0 < r) (hr : ∀ x : E, x ≠ 1 → r ≤ ‖x‖) :
DiscreteTopology E :=
.of_forall_le_dist hpos fun x y hne ↦ by
simp only [dist_eq_norm_div]
exact hr _ (div_ne_one.2 hne)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_one_right (a : E) : dist a 1 = ‖a‖ := by rw [dist_eq_norm_div, div_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem inseparable_one_iff_norm {a : E} : Inseparable a 1 ↔ ‖a‖ = 0 := by
rw [Metric.inseparable_iff, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive]
lemma dist_one_left (a : E) : dist 1 a = ‖a‖ := by rw [dist_comm, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma dist_one : dist (1 : E) = norm := funext dist_one_left
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_rev (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖ = ‖b / a‖ := by
simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_comm a b
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_neg]
theorem norm_inv' (a : E) : ‖a⁻¹‖ = ‖a‖ := by simpa using norm_div_rev 1 a
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_abs_zsmul]
theorem norm_zpow_abs (a : E) (n : ℤ) : ‖a ^ |n|‖ = ‖a ^ n‖ := by
rcases le_total 0 n with hn | hn <;> simp [hn, abs_of_nonneg, abs_of_nonpos]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_natAbs_smul]
theorem norm_pow_natAbs (a : E) (n : ℤ) : ‖a ^ n.natAbs‖ = ‖a ^ n‖ := by
rw [← zpow_natCast, ← Int.abs_eq_natAbs, norm_zpow_abs]
@[to_additive norm_isUnit_zsmul]
theorem norm_zpow_isUnit (a : E) {n : ℤ} (hn : IsUnit n) : ‖a ^ n‖ = ‖a‖ := by
rw [← norm_pow_natAbs, Int.isUnit_iff_natAbs_eq.mp hn, pow_one]
@[simp]
theorem norm_units_zsmul {E : Type*} [SeminormedAddGroup E] (n : ℤˣ) (a : E) : ‖n • a‖ = ‖a‖ :=
norm_isUnit_zsmul a n.isUnit
open scoped symmDiff in
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → E) (x : α) :
dist (s.mulIndicator f x) (t.mulIndicator f x) = ‖(s ∆ t).mulIndicator f x‖ := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_div, Set.apply_mulIndicator_symmDiff norm_inv']
/-- **Triangle inequality** for the norm. -/
@[to_additive norm_add_le "**Triangle inequality** for the norm."]
theorem norm_mul_le' (a b : E) : ‖a * b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a 1 b⁻¹
/-- **Triangle inequality** for the norm. -/
@[to_additive norm_add_le_of_le "**Triangle inequality** for the norm."]
theorem norm_mul_le_of_le' (h₁ : ‖a₁‖ ≤ r₁) (h₂ : ‖a₂‖ ≤ r₂) : ‖a₁ * a₂‖ ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(norm_mul_le' a₁ a₂).trans <| add_le_add h₁ h₂
/-- **Triangle inequality** for the norm. -/
@[to_additive norm_add₃_le "**Triangle inequality** for the norm."]
lemma norm_mul₃_le' : ‖a * b * c‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ + ‖c‖ := norm_mul_le_of_le' (norm_mul_le' _ _) le_rfl
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_div_le_norm_div_add_norm_div (a b c : E) : ‖a / c‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ + ‖b / c‖ := by
simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a b c
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_nonneg]
theorem norm_nonneg' (a : E) : 0 ≤ ‖a‖ := by
rw [← dist_one_right]
exact dist_nonneg
attribute [bound] norm_nonneg
@[to_additive (attr := simp) abs_norm]
theorem abs_norm' (z : E) : |‖z‖| = ‖z‖ := abs_of_nonneg <| norm_nonneg' _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_zero]
theorem norm_one' : ‖(1 : E)‖ = 0 := by rw [← dist_one_right, dist_self]
@[to_additive]
theorem ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero : ‖a‖ ≠ 0 → a ≠ 1 :=
mt <| by
rintro rfl
exact norm_one'
@[to_additive (attr := nontriviality) norm_of_subsingleton]
theorem norm_of_subsingleton' [Subsingleton E] (a : E) : ‖a‖ = 0 := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim a 1, norm_one']
@[to_additive zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq]
theorem zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq' (x : E) : 0 < 1 + ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
positivity
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_le (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a 1 b
attribute [bound] norm_sub_le
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_le_of_le {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (H₁ : ‖a₁‖ ≤ r₁) (H₂ : ‖a₂‖ ≤ r₂) : ‖a₁ / a₂‖ ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(norm_div_le a₁ a₂).trans <| add_le_add H₁ H₂
@[to_additive dist_le_norm_add_norm]
theorem dist_le_norm_add_norm' (a b : E) : dist a b ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_div]
apply norm_div_le
@[to_additive abs_norm_sub_norm_le]
theorem abs_norm_sub_norm_le' (a b : E) : |‖a‖ - ‖b‖| ≤ ‖a / b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using abs_dist_sub_le a b 1
@[to_additive norm_sub_norm_le]
theorem norm_sub_norm_le' (a b : E) : ‖a‖ - ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ :=
(le_abs_self _).trans (abs_norm_sub_norm_le' a b)
@[to_additive (attr := bound)]
theorem norm_sub_le_norm_mul (a b : E) : ‖a‖ - ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a * b‖ := by
simpa using norm_mul_le' (a * b) (b⁻¹)
@[to_additive dist_norm_norm_le]
theorem dist_norm_norm_le' (a b : E) : dist ‖a‖ ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ :=
abs_norm_sub_norm_le' a b
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' (u v : E) : ‖u‖ ≤ ‖v‖ + ‖u / v‖ := by
rw [add_comm]
refine (norm_mul_le' _ _).trans_eq' ?_
rw [div_mul_cancel]
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_le_norm_add_norm_div (u v : E) : ‖v‖ ≤ ‖u‖ + ‖u / v‖ := by
rw [norm_div_rev]
exact norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' v u
alias norm_le_insert' := norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub'
alias norm_le_insert := norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_le_mul_norm_add (u v : E) : ‖u‖ ≤ ‖u * v‖ + ‖v‖ :=
calc
‖u‖ = ‖u * v / v‖ := by rw [mul_div_cancel_right]
_ ≤ ‖u * v‖ + ‖v‖ := norm_div_le _ _
/-- An analogue of `norm_le_mul_norm_add` for the multiplication from the left. -/
@[to_additive "An analogue of `norm_le_add_norm_add` for the addition from the left."]
theorem norm_le_mul_norm_add' (u v : E) : ‖v‖ ≤ ‖u * v‖ + ‖u‖ :=
calc
‖v‖ = ‖u⁻¹ * (u * v)‖ := by rw [← mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel, one_mul]
_ ≤ ‖u⁻¹‖ + ‖u * v‖ := norm_mul_le' u⁻¹ (u * v)
_ = ‖u * v‖ + ‖u‖ := by rw [norm_inv', add_comm]
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_mul_eq_norm_right {x : E} (y : E) (h : ‖x‖ = 0) : ‖x * y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· simpa [h] using norm_mul_le' x y
· simpa [h] using norm_le_mul_norm_add' x y
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_mul_eq_norm_left (x : E) {y : E} (h : ‖y‖ = 0) : ‖x * y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· simpa [h] using norm_mul_le' x y
· simpa [h] using norm_le_mul_norm_add x y
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_div_eq_norm_right {x : E} (y : E) (h : ‖x‖ = 0) : ‖x / y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· simpa [h] using norm_div_le x y
· simpa [h, norm_div_rev x y] using norm_sub_norm_le' y x
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_div_eq_norm_left (x : E) {y : E} (h : ‖y‖ = 0) : ‖x / y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· simpa [h] using norm_div_le x y
· simpa [h] using norm_sub_norm_le' x y
@[to_additive ball_eq]
theorem ball_eq' (y : E) (ε : ℝ) : ball y ε = { x | ‖x / y‖ < ε } :=
Set.ext fun a => by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem ball_one_eq (r : ℝ) : ball (1 : E) r = { x | ‖x‖ < r } :=
Set.ext fun a => by simp
@[to_additive mem_ball_iff_norm]
theorem mem_ball_iff_norm'' : b ∈ ball a r ↔ ‖b / a‖ < r := by rw [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive mem_ball_iff_norm']
theorem mem_ball_iff_norm''' : b ∈ ball a r ↔ ‖a / b‖ < r := by rw [mem_ball', dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_ball_one_iff : a ∈ ball (1 : E) r ↔ ‖a‖ < r := by rw [mem_ball, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive mem_closedBall_iff_norm]
theorem mem_closedBall_iff_norm'' : b ∈ closedBall a r ↔ ‖b / a‖ ≤ r := by
rw [mem_closedBall, dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_closedBall_one_iff : a ∈ closedBall (1 : E) r ↔ ‖a‖ ≤ r := by
rw [mem_closedBall, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive mem_closedBall_iff_norm']
theorem mem_closedBall_iff_norm''' : b ∈ closedBall a r ↔ ‖a / b‖ ≤ r := by
rw [mem_closedBall', dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive norm_le_of_mem_closedBall]
theorem norm_le_of_mem_closedBall' (h : b ∈ closedBall a r) : ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + r :=
(norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' _ _).trans <| add_le_add_left (by rwa [← dist_eq_norm_div]) _
@[to_additive norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le]
theorem norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le' : dist a b ≤ r → ‖a‖ ≤ ‖b‖ + r :=
norm_le_of_mem_closedBall'
@[to_additive norm_lt_of_mem_ball]
theorem norm_lt_of_mem_ball' (h : b ∈ ball a r) : ‖b‖ < ‖a‖ + r :=
(norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' _ _).trans_lt <| add_lt_add_left (by rwa [← dist_eq_norm_div]) _
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_sub_norm_div_le_norm_div (u v w : E) : ‖u / w‖ - ‖v / w‖ ≤ ‖u / v‖ := by
simpa only [div_div_div_cancel_right] using norm_sub_norm_le' (u / w) (v / w)
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1001) mem_sphere_iff_norm]
-- Porting note: increase priority so the left-hand side doesn't reduce
theorem mem_sphere_iff_norm' : b ∈ sphere a r ↔ ‖b / a‖ = r := by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive] -- `simp` can prove this
theorem mem_sphere_one_iff_norm : a ∈ sphere (1 : E) r ↔ ‖a‖ = r := by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_eq_of_mem_sphere]
theorem norm_eq_of_mem_sphere' (x : sphere (1 : E) r) : ‖(x : E)‖ = r :=
mem_sphere_one_iff_norm.mp x.2
@[to_additive]
theorem ne_one_of_mem_sphere (hr : r ≠ 0) (x : sphere (1 : E) r) : (x : E) ≠ 1 :=
ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero <| by rwa [norm_eq_of_mem_sphere' x]
@[to_additive ne_zero_of_mem_unit_sphere]
theorem ne_one_of_mem_unit_sphere (x : sphere (1 : E) 1) : (x : E) ≠ 1 :=
ne_one_of_mem_sphere one_ne_zero _
variable (E)
/-- The norm of a seminormed group as a group seminorm. -/
@[to_additive "The norm of a seminormed group as an additive group seminorm."]
def normGroupSeminorm : GroupSeminorm E :=
⟨norm, norm_one', norm_mul_le', norm_inv'⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_normGroupSeminorm : ⇑(normGroupSeminorm E) = norm :=
rfl
variable {E}
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_one {f : α → E} {l : Filter α} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝 1) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ < ε :=
Metric.tendsto_nhds.trans <| by simp only [dist_one_right]
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_nhds {f : E → F} {x : E} {y : F} :
Tendsto f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x', ‖x' / x‖ < δ → ‖f x' / y‖ < ε := by
simp_rw [Metric.tendsto_nhds_nhds, dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.nhds_basis_norm_lt (x : E) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { y | ‖y / x‖ < ε } := by
simp_rw [← ball_eq']
exact Metric.nhds_basis_ball
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.nhds_one_basis_norm_lt :
(𝓝 (1 : E)).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { y | ‖y‖ < ε } := by
convert NormedCommGroup.nhds_basis_norm_lt (1 : E)
simp
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.uniformity_basis_dist :
(𝓤 E).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { p : E × E | ‖p.fst / p.snd‖ < ε } := by
convert Metric.uniformity_basis_dist (α := E) using 1
simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
open Finset
variable [FunLike 𝓕 E F]
section NNNorm
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) SeminormedGroup.toNNNorm : NNNorm E :=
⟨fun a => ⟨‖a‖, norm_nonneg' a⟩⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast) coe_nnnorm]
theorem coe_nnnorm' (a : E) : (‖a‖₊ : ℝ) = ‖a‖ := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) coe_comp_nnnorm]
theorem coe_comp_nnnorm' : (toReal : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) ∘ (nnnorm : E → ℝ≥0) = norm :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_toNNReal]
theorem norm_toNNReal' : ‖a‖.toNNReal = ‖a‖₊ :=
@Real.toNNReal_coe ‖a‖₊
@[to_additive (attr := simp) toReal_enorm]
lemma toReal_enorm' (x : E) : ‖x‖ₑ.toReal = ‖x‖ := by simp [enorm]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) ofReal_norm]
lemma ofReal_norm' (x : E) : .ofReal ‖x‖ = ‖x‖ₑ := by
simp [enorm, ENNReal.ofReal, Real.toNNReal, nnnorm]
@[to_additive enorm_eq_iff_norm_eq]
theorem enorm'_eq_iff_norm_eq {x : E} {y : F} : ‖x‖ₑ = ‖y‖ₑ ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
simp only [← ofReal_norm']
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ by congr⟩
exact (Real.toNNReal_eq_toNNReal_iff (norm_nonneg' _) (norm_nonneg' _)).mp (ENNReal.coe_inj.mp h)
@[to_additive enorm_le_iff_norm_le]
theorem enorm'_le_iff_norm_le {x : E} {y : F} : ‖x‖ₑ ≤ ‖y‖ₑ ↔ ‖x‖ ≤ ‖y‖ := by
simp only [← ofReal_norm']
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ by gcongr⟩
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff (norm_nonneg' _)] at h
exact h
@[to_additive]
theorem nndist_eq_nnnorm_div (a b : E) : nndist a b = ‖a / b‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_eq_norm_div _ _
alias nndist_eq_nnnorm := nndist_eq_nnnorm_sub
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem nndist_one_right (a : E) : nndist a 1 = ‖a‖₊ := by simp [nndist_eq_nnnorm_div]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma edist_one_right (a : E) : edist a 1 = ‖a‖ₑ := by simp [edist_nndist, nndist_one_right, enorm]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_zero]
theorem nnnorm_one' : ‖(1 : E)‖₊ = 0 := NNReal.eq norm_one'
@[to_additive]
theorem ne_one_of_nnnorm_ne_zero {a : E} : ‖a‖₊ ≠ 0 → a ≠ 1 :=
mt <| by
rintro rfl
exact nnnorm_one'
@[to_additive nnnorm_add_le]
theorem nnnorm_mul_le' (a b : E) : ‖a * b‖₊ ≤ ‖a‖₊ + ‖b‖₊ :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| norm_mul_le' a b
@[to_additive norm_nsmul_le]
lemma norm_pow_le_mul_norm : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ‖a ^ n‖ ≤ n * ‖a‖
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by simpa [pow_succ, add_mul] using norm_mul_le_of_le' norm_pow_le_mul_norm le_rfl
@[to_additive nnnorm_nsmul_le]
lemma nnnorm_pow_le_mul_norm {n : ℕ} : ‖a ^ n‖₊ ≤ n * ‖a‖₊ := by
simpa only [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.coe_mul, NNReal.coe_natCast] using norm_pow_le_mul_norm
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_neg]
theorem nnnorm_inv' (a : E) : ‖a⁻¹‖₊ = ‖a‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_inv' a
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_abs_zsmul]
theorem nnnorm_zpow_abs (a : E) (n : ℤ) : ‖a ^ |n|‖₊ = ‖a ^ n‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_zpow_abs a n
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_natAbs_smul]
theorem nnnorm_pow_natAbs (a : E) (n : ℤ) : ‖a ^ n.natAbs‖₊ = ‖a ^ n‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_pow_natAbs a n
@[to_additive nnnorm_isUnit_zsmul]
theorem nnnorm_zpow_isUnit (a : E) {n : ℤ} (hn : IsUnit n) : ‖a ^ n‖₊ = ‖a‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_zpow_isUnit a hn
@[simp]
theorem nnnorm_units_zsmul {E : Type*} [SeminormedAddGroup E] (n : ℤˣ) (a : E) : ‖n • a‖₊ = ‖a‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_isUnit_zsmul a n.isUnit
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem nndist_one_left (a : E) : nndist 1 a = ‖a‖₊ := by simp [nndist_eq_nnnorm_div]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem edist_one_left (a : E) : edist 1 a = ‖a‖₊ := by
rw [edist_nndist, nndist_one_left]
open scoped symmDiff in
@[to_additive]
theorem nndist_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → E) (x : α) :
nndist (s.mulIndicator f x) (t.mulIndicator f x) = ‖(s ∆ t).mulIndicator f x‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_mulIndicator s t f x
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_div_le (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖₊ ≤ ‖a‖₊ + ‖b‖₊ :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| norm_div_le _ _
@[to_additive]
lemma enorm_div_le : ‖a / b‖ₑ ≤ ‖a‖ₑ + ‖b‖ₑ := by
simpa [enorm, ← ENNReal.coe_add] using nnnorm_div_le a b
@[to_additive nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le]
theorem nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le' (a b : E) : nndist ‖a‖₊ ‖b‖₊ ≤ ‖a / b‖₊ :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| dist_norm_norm_le' a b
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_div (a b : E) : ‖b‖₊ ≤ ‖a‖₊ + ‖a / b‖₊ :=
norm_le_norm_add_norm_div _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_div' (a b : E) : ‖a‖₊ ≤ ‖b‖₊ + ‖a / b‖₊ :=
norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' _ _
alias nnnorm_le_insert' := nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_sub'
alias nnnorm_le_insert := nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_add (a b : E) : ‖a‖₊ ≤ ‖a * b‖₊ + ‖b‖₊ :=
norm_le_mul_norm_add _ _
/-- An analogue of `nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_add` for the multiplication from the left. -/
@[to_additive "An analogue of `nnnorm_le_add_nnnorm_add` for the addition from the left."]
theorem nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_add' (a b : E) : ‖b‖₊ ≤ ‖a * b‖₊ + ‖a‖₊ :=
norm_le_mul_norm_add' _ _
@[to_additive]
lemma nnnorm_mul_eq_nnnorm_right {x : E} (y : E) (h : ‖x‖₊ = 0) : ‖x * y‖₊ = ‖y‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_mul_eq_norm_right _ <| congr_arg NNReal.toReal h
@[to_additive]
lemma nnnorm_mul_eq_nnnorm_left (x : E) {y : E} (h : ‖y‖₊ = 0) : ‖x * y‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_mul_eq_norm_left _ <| congr_arg NNReal.toReal h
@[to_additive]
lemma nnnorm_div_eq_nnnorm_right {x : E} (y : E) (h : ‖x‖₊ = 0) : ‖x / y‖₊ = ‖y‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_div_eq_norm_right _ <| congr_arg NNReal.toReal h
@[to_additive]
lemma nnnorm_div_eq_nnnorm_left (x : E) {y : E} (h : ‖y‖₊ = 0) : ‖x / y‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_div_eq_norm_left _ <| congr_arg NNReal.toReal h
/-- The non negative norm seen as an `ENNReal` and then as a `Real` is equal to the norm. -/
@[to_additive toReal_coe_nnnorm "The non negative norm seen as an `ENNReal` and
then as a `Real` is equal to the norm."]
theorem toReal_coe_nnnorm' (a : E) : (‖a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞).toReal = ‖a‖ := rfl
open scoped symmDiff in
@[to_additive]
theorem edist_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → E) (x : α) :
edist (s.mulIndicator f x) (t.mulIndicator f x) = ‖(s ∆ t).mulIndicator f x‖₊ := by
rw [edist_nndist, nndist_mulIndicator]
end NNNorm
section ENorm
@[to_additive (attr := simp) enorm_zero]
lemma enorm_one' {E : Type*} [TopologicalSpace E] [ENormedMonoid E] : ‖(1 : E)‖ₑ = 0 := by
rw [ENormedMonoid.enorm_eq_zero]
@[to_additive exists_enorm_lt]
lemma exists_enorm_lt' (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E] [ENormedMonoid E]
[hbot : NeBot (𝓝[≠] (1 : E))] {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ 0) : ∃ x ≠ (1 : E), ‖x‖ₑ < c :=
frequently_iff_neBot.mpr hbot |>.and_eventually
(ContinuousENorm.continuous_enorm.tendsto' 1 0 (by simp) |>.eventually_lt_const hc.bot_lt)
|>.exists
@[to_additive (attr := simp) enorm_neg]
lemma enorm_inv' (a : E) : ‖a⁻¹‖ₑ = ‖a‖ₑ := by simp [enorm]
@[to_additive ofReal_norm_eq_enorm]
lemma ofReal_norm_eq_enorm' (a : E) : .ofReal ‖a‖ = ‖a‖ₑ := ENNReal.ofReal_eq_coe_nnreal _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm := ofReal_norm_eq_enorm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm' := ofReal_norm_eq_enorm'
instance : ENorm ℝ≥0∞ where
enorm x := x
@[simp] lemma enorm_eq_self (x : ℝ≥0∞) : ‖x‖ₑ = x := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem edist_eq_enorm_div (a b : E) : edist a b = ‖a / b‖ₑ := by
rw [edist_dist, dist_eq_norm_div, ofReal_norm_eq_enorm']
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_sub := edist_eq_enorm_sub
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_div := edist_eq_enorm_div
@[to_additive]
theorem edist_one_eq_enorm (x : E) : edist x 1 = ‖x‖ₑ := by rw [edist_eq_enorm_div, div_one]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias edist_eq_coe_nnnorm := edist_zero_eq_enorm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias edist_eq_coe_nnnorm' := edist_one_eq_enorm
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_emetric_ball_one_iff {r : ℝ≥0∞} : a ∈ EMetric.ball 1 r ↔ ‖a‖ₑ < r := by
rw [EMetric.mem_ball, edist_one_eq_enorm]
end ENorm
section ContinuousENorm
variable {E : Type*} [TopologicalSpace E] [ContinuousENorm E]
@[continuity, fun_prop]
lemma continuous_enorm : Continuous fun a : E ↦ ‖a‖ₑ := ContinuousENorm.continuous_enorm
variable {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] {f : X → E} {s : Set X} {a : X}
@[fun_prop]
lemma Continuous.enorm : Continuous f → Continuous (‖f ·‖ₑ) :=
continuous_enorm.comp
lemma ContinuousAt.enorm {a : X} (h : ContinuousAt f a) : ContinuousAt (‖f ·‖ₑ) a := by fun_prop
@[fun_prop]
lemma ContinuousWithinAt.enorm {s : Set X} {a : X} (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s a) :
ContinuousWithinAt (‖f ·‖ₑ) s a :=
(ContinuousENorm.continuous_enorm.continuousWithinAt).comp (t := Set.univ) h
(fun _ _ ↦ by trivial)
@[fun_prop]
lemma ContinuousOn.enorm (h : ContinuousOn f s) : ContinuousOn (‖f ·‖ₑ) s :=
(ContinuousENorm.continuous_enorm.continuousOn).comp (t := Set.univ) h <| Set.mapsTo_univ _ _
end ContinuousENorm
section ENormedMonoid
variable {E : Type*} [TopologicalSpace E] [ENormedMonoid E]
@[to_additive enorm_add_le]
lemma enorm_mul_le' (a b : E) : ‖a * b‖ₑ ≤ ‖a‖ₑ + ‖b‖ₑ := ENormedMonoid.enorm_mul_le a b
@[to_additive (attr := simp) enorm_eq_zero]
lemma enorm_eq_zero' {a : E} : ‖a‖ₑ = 0 ↔ a = 1 := by
simp [enorm, ENormedMonoid.enorm_eq_zero]
@[to_additive enorm_ne_zero]
lemma enorm_ne_zero' {a : E} : ‖a‖ₑ ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 1 :=
enorm_eq_zero'.ne
@[to_additive (attr := simp) enorm_pos]
lemma enorm_pos' {a : E} : 0 < ‖a‖ₑ ↔ a ≠ 1 :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans enorm_ne_zero'
end ENormedMonoid
instance : ENormedAddCommMonoid ℝ≥0∞ where
continuous_enorm := continuous_id
enorm_eq_zero := by simp
enorm_add_le := by simp
open Set in
@[to_additive]
lemma SeminormedGroup.disjoint_nhds (x : E) (f : Filter E) :
Disjoint (𝓝 x) f ↔ ∃ δ > 0, ∀ᶠ y in f, δ ≤ ‖y / x‖ := by
simp [NormedCommGroup.nhds_basis_norm_lt x |>.disjoint_iff_left, compl_setOf, eventually_iff]
@[to_additive]
lemma SeminormedGroup.disjoint_nhds_one (f : Filter E) :
Disjoint (𝓝 1) f ↔ ∃ δ > 0, ∀ᶠ y in f, δ ≤ ‖y‖ := by
simpa using disjoint_nhds 1 f
end SeminormedGroup
section Induced
variable (E F)
variable [FunLike 𝓕 E F]
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- A group homomorphism from a `Group` to a `SeminormedGroup` induces a `SeminormedGroup`
structure on the domain. -/
@[to_additive "A group homomorphism from an `AddGroup` to a
`SeminormedAddGroup` induces a `SeminormedAddGroup` structure on the domain."]
abbrev SeminormedGroup.induced [Group E] [SeminormedGroup F] [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) :
SeminormedGroup E :=
{ PseudoMetricSpace.induced f toPseudoMetricSpace with
norm := fun x => ‖f x‖
dist_eq := fun x y => by simp only [map_div, ← dist_eq_norm_div]; rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- A group homomorphism from a `CommGroup` to a `SeminormedGroup` induces a
`SeminormedCommGroup` structure on the domain. -/
@[to_additive "A group homomorphism from an `AddCommGroup` to a
`SeminormedAddGroup` induces a `SeminormedAddCommGroup` structure on the domain."]
abbrev SeminormedCommGroup.induced
[CommGroup E] [SeminormedGroup F] [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.induced E F f with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances].
/-- An injective group homomorphism from a `Group` to a `NormedGroup` induces a `NormedGroup`
structure on the domain. -/
@[to_additive "An injective group homomorphism from an `AddGroup` to a
`NormedAddGroup` induces a `NormedAddGroup` structure on the domain."]
abbrev NormedGroup.induced
[Group E] [NormedGroup F] [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) (h : Injective f) :
NormedGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.induced E F f, MetricSpace.induced f h _ with }
-- See note [reducible non-instances].
/-- An injective group homomorphism from a `CommGroup` to a `NormedGroup` induces a
`NormedCommGroup` structure on the domain. -/
@[to_additive "An injective group homomorphism from a `CommGroup` to a
`NormedCommGroup` induces a `NormedCommGroup` structure on the domain."]
abbrev NormedCommGroup.induced [CommGroup E] [NormedGroup F] [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕)
(h : Injective f) : NormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.induced E F f, MetricSpace.induced f h _ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
end Induced
namespace Real
variable {r : ℝ}
instance norm : Norm ℝ where
norm r := |r|
@[simp]
theorem norm_eq_abs (r : ℝ) : ‖r‖ = |r| :=
rfl
instance normedAddCommGroup : NormedAddCommGroup ℝ :=
⟨fun _r _y => rfl⟩
theorem norm_of_nonneg (hr : 0 ≤ r) : ‖r‖ = r :=
abs_of_nonneg hr
theorem norm_of_nonpos (hr : r ≤ 0) : ‖r‖ = -r :=
abs_of_nonpos hr
theorem le_norm_self (r : ℝ) : r ≤ ‖r‖ :=
le_abs_self r
@[simp 1100] lemma norm_natCast (n : ℕ) : ‖(n : ℝ)‖ = n := abs_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg
@[simp 1100] lemma nnnorm_natCast (n : ℕ) : ‖(n : ℝ)‖₊ = n := NNReal.eq <| norm_natCast _
@[simp 1100] lemma enorm_natCast (n : ℕ) : ‖(n : ℝ)‖ₑ = n := by simp [enorm]
@[simp 1100] lemma norm_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
‖(ofNat(n) : ℝ)‖ = ofNat(n) := norm_natCast n
@[simp 1100] lemma nnnorm_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
‖(ofNat(n) : ℝ)‖₊ = ofNat(n) := nnnorm_natCast n
lemma norm_two : ‖(2 : ℝ)‖ = 2 := abs_of_pos zero_lt_two
lemma nnnorm_two : ‖(2 : ℝ)‖₊ = 2 := NNReal.eq <| by simp
@[simp 1100, norm_cast]
lemma norm_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : ‖(q : ℝ)‖ = q := norm_of_nonneg q.cast_nonneg
@[simp 1100, norm_cast]
lemma nnnorm_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : ‖(q : ℝ)‖₊ = q := by simp [nnnorm, -norm_eq_abs]
theorem nnnorm_of_nonneg (hr : 0 ≤ r) : ‖r‖₊ = ⟨r, hr⟩ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_of_nonneg hr
lemma enorm_of_nonneg (hr : 0 ≤ r) : ‖r‖ₑ = .ofReal r := by
simp [enorm, nnnorm_of_nonneg hr, ENNReal.ofReal, toNNReal, hr]
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_abs (r : ℝ) : ‖|r|‖₊ = ‖r‖₊ := by simp [nnnorm]
@[simp] lemma enorm_abs (r : ℝ) : ‖|r|‖ₑ = ‖r‖ₑ := by simp [enorm]
theorem enorm_eq_ofReal (hr : 0 ≤ r) : ‖r‖ₑ = .ofReal r := by
rw [← ofReal_norm_eq_enorm, norm_of_nonneg hr]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias ennnorm_eq_ofReal := enorm_eq_ofReal
theorem enorm_eq_ofReal_abs (r : ℝ) : ‖r‖ₑ = ENNReal.ofReal |r| := by
rw [← enorm_eq_ofReal (abs_nonneg _), enorm_abs]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias ennnorm_eq_ofReal_abs := enorm_eq_ofReal_abs
theorem toNNReal_eq_nnnorm_of_nonneg (hr : 0 ≤ r) : r.toNNReal = ‖r‖₊ := by
rw [Real.toNNReal_of_nonneg hr]
ext
rw [coe_mk, coe_nnnorm r, Real.norm_eq_abs r, abs_of_nonneg hr]
-- Porting note: this is due to the change from `Subtype.val` to `NNReal.toReal` for the coercion
theorem ofReal_le_enorm (r : ℝ) : ENNReal.ofReal r ≤ ‖r‖ₑ := by
rw [enorm_eq_ofReal_abs]; gcongr; exact le_abs_self _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias ofReal_le_ennnorm := ofReal_le_enorm
end Real
namespace NNReal
instance : NNNorm ℝ≥0 where
nnnorm x := x
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_eq_self (x : ℝ≥0) : ‖x‖₊ = x := rfl
end NNReal
section SeminormedCommGroup
variable [SeminormedCommGroup E] [SeminormedCommGroup F] {a b : E} {r : ℝ}
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_inv (x y : E) : dist x⁻¹ y = dist x y⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [dist_eq_norm_div, ← norm_inv' (x⁻¹ / y), inv_div, div_inv_eq_mul, mul_comm]
theorem norm_multiset_sum_le {E} [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] (m : Multiset E) :
‖m.sum‖ ≤ (m.map fun x => ‖x‖).sum :=
m.le_sum_of_subadditive norm norm_zero norm_add_le
@[to_additive existing]
theorem norm_multiset_prod_le (m : Multiset E) : ‖m.prod‖ ≤ (m.map fun x => ‖x‖).sum := by
rw [← Multiplicative.ofAdd_le, ofAdd_multiset_prod, Multiset.map_map]
refine Multiset.le_prod_of_submultiplicative (Multiplicative.ofAdd ∘ norm) ?_ (fun x y => ?_) _
· simp only [comp_apply, norm_one', ofAdd_zero]
· exact norm_mul_le' x y
@[bound]
theorem norm_sum_le {ι E} [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) :
‖∑ i ∈ s, f i‖ ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, ‖f i‖ :=
s.le_sum_of_subadditive norm norm_zero norm_add_le f
@[to_additive existing]
theorem norm_prod_le (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) : ‖∏ i ∈ s, f i‖ ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, ‖f i‖ := by
rw [← Multiplicative.ofAdd_le, ofAdd_sum]
refine Finset.le_prod_of_submultiplicative (Multiplicative.ofAdd ∘ norm) ?_ (fun x y => ?_) _ _
· simp only [comp_apply, norm_one', ofAdd_zero]
· exact norm_mul_le' x y
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_prod_le_of_le (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → E} {n : ι → ℝ} (h : ∀ b ∈ s, ‖f b‖ ≤ n b) :
‖∏ b ∈ s, f b‖ ≤ ∑ b ∈ s, n b :=
(norm_prod_le s f).trans <| Finset.sum_le_sum h
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_prod_prod_le_of_le (s : Finset ι) {f a : ι → E} {d : ι → ℝ}
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, dist (f b) (a b) ≤ d b) :
dist (∏ b ∈ s, f b) (∏ b ∈ s, a b) ≤ ∑ b ∈ s, d b := by
simp only [dist_eq_norm_div, ← Finset.prod_div_distrib] at *
exact norm_prod_le_of_le s h
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_prod_prod_le (s : Finset ι) (f a : ι → E) :
dist (∏ b ∈ s, f b) (∏ b ∈ s, a b) ≤ ∑ b ∈ s, dist (f b) (a b) :=
dist_prod_prod_le_of_le s fun _ _ => le_rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_ball_iff_norm : a * b ∈ ball a r ↔ ‖b‖ < r := by
rw [mem_ball_iff_norm'', mul_div_cancel_left]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_closedBall_iff_norm : a * b ∈ closedBall a r ↔ ‖b‖ ≤ r := by
rw [mem_closedBall_iff_norm'', mul_div_cancel_left]
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1001)]
-- Porting note: increase priority so that the left-hand side doesn't simplify
theorem preimage_mul_ball (a b : E) (r : ℝ) : (b * ·) ⁻¹' ball a r = ball (a / b) r := by
ext c
simp only [dist_eq_norm_div, Set.mem_preimage, mem_ball, div_div_eq_mul_div, mul_comm]
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1001)]
-- Porting note: increase priority so that the left-hand side doesn't simplify
theorem preimage_mul_closedBall (a b : E) (r : ℝ) :
(b * ·) ⁻¹' closedBall a r = closedBall (a / b) r := by
ext c
simp only [dist_eq_norm_div, Set.mem_preimage, mem_closedBall, div_div_eq_mul_div, mul_comm]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem preimage_mul_sphere (a b : E) (r : ℝ) : (b * ·) ⁻¹' sphere a r = sphere (a / b) r := by
ext c
simp only [Set.mem_preimage, mem_sphere_iff_norm', div_div_eq_mul_div, mul_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_mem_closedBall {n : ℕ} (h : a ∈ closedBall b r) :
a ^ n ∈ closedBall (b ^ n) (n • r) := by
simp only [mem_closedBall, dist_eq_norm_div, ← div_pow] at h ⊢
refine norm_pow_le_mul_norm.trans ?_
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left h n.cast_nonneg
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_mem_ball {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (h : a ∈ ball b r) : a ^ n ∈ ball (b ^ n) (n • r) := by
simp only [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm_div, ← div_pow] at h ⊢
refine lt_of_le_of_lt norm_pow_le_mul_norm ?_
replace hn : 0 < (n : ℝ) := by norm_cast
rw [nsmul_eq_mul]
nlinarith
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_closedBall_mul_iff {c : E} : a * c ∈ closedBall (b * c) r ↔ a ∈ closedBall b r := by
simp only [mem_closedBall, dist_eq_norm_div, mul_div_mul_right_eq_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_ball_mul_iff {c : E} : a * c ∈ ball (b * c) r ↔ a ∈ ball b r := by
simp only [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm_div, mul_div_mul_right_eq_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_closedBall'' : a • closedBall b r = closedBall (a • b) r := by
ext
simp [mem_closedBall, Set.mem_smul_set, dist_eq_norm_div, div_eq_inv_mul, ←
eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_ball'' : a • ball b r = ball (a • b) r := by
ext
simp [mem_ball, Set.mem_smul_set, dist_eq_norm_div, _root_.div_eq_inv_mul,
← eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_multiset_prod_le (m : Multiset E) : ‖m.prod‖₊ ≤ (m.map fun x => ‖x‖₊).sum :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| by
push_cast
rw [Multiset.map_map]
exact norm_multiset_prod_le _
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_prod_le (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) : ‖∏ a ∈ s, f a‖₊ ≤ ∑ a ∈ s, ‖f a‖₊ :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| by
push_cast
exact norm_prod_le _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_prod_le_of_le (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → E} {n : ι → ℝ≥0} (h : ∀ b ∈ s, ‖f b‖₊ ≤ n b) :
‖∏ b ∈ s, f b‖₊ ≤ ∑ b ∈ s, n b :=
(norm_prod_le_of_le s h).trans_eq (NNReal.coe_sum ..).symm
-- Porting note: increase priority so that the LHS doesn't simplify
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1001) norm_norm]
lemma norm_norm' (x : E) : ‖‖x‖‖ = ‖x‖ := Real.norm_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg' _)
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_norm]
lemma nnnorm_norm' (x : E) : ‖‖x‖‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ := by simp [nnnorm]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) enorm_norm]
lemma enorm_norm' (x : E) : ‖‖x‖‖ₑ = ‖x‖ₑ := by simp [enorm]
lemma enorm_enorm {ε : Type*} [ENorm ε] (x : ε) : ‖‖x‖ₑ‖ₑ = ‖x‖ₑ := by simp [enorm]
end SeminormedCommGroup
section NormedGroup
variable [NormedGroup E] {a b : E}
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_le_zero_iff]
lemma norm_le_zero_iff' : ‖a‖ ≤ 0 ↔ a = 1 := by rw [← dist_one_right, dist_le_zero]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_pos_iff]
lemma norm_pos_iff' : 0 < ‖a‖ ↔ a ≠ 1 := by rw [← not_le, norm_le_zero_iff']
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_eq_zero]
lemma norm_eq_zero' : ‖a‖ = 0 ↔ a = 1 := (norm_nonneg' a).le_iff_eq.symm.trans norm_le_zero_iff'
@[to_additive norm_ne_zero_iff]
lemma norm_ne_zero_iff' : ‖a‖ ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 1 := norm_eq_zero'.not
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-24")] alias norm_le_zero_iff'' := norm_le_zero_iff'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-24")] alias norm_le_zero_iff''' := norm_le_zero_iff'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-24")] alias norm_pos_iff'' := norm_pos_iff'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-24")] alias norm_eq_zero'' := norm_eq_zero'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-24")] alias norm_eq_zero''' := norm_eq_zero'
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_eq_zero_iff : ‖a / b‖ = 0 ↔ a = b := by rw [norm_eq_zero', div_eq_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_pos_iff : 0 < ‖a / b‖ ↔ a ≠ b := by
rw [(norm_nonneg' _).lt_iff_ne, ne_comm]
exact norm_div_eq_zero_iff.not
@[to_additive eq_of_norm_sub_le_zero]
theorem eq_of_norm_div_le_zero (h : ‖a / b‖ ≤ 0) : a = b := by
rwa [← div_eq_one, ← norm_le_zero_iff']
alias ⟨eq_of_norm_div_eq_zero, _⟩ := norm_div_eq_zero_iff
attribute [to_additive] eq_of_norm_div_eq_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_or_norm_pos (a : E) : a = 1 ∨ 0 < ‖a‖ := by
simpa [eq_comm] using (norm_nonneg' a).eq_or_lt
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_or_nnnorm_pos (a : E) : a = 1 ∨ 0 < ‖a‖₊ :=
eq_one_or_norm_pos a
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_eq_zero]
theorem nnnorm_eq_zero' : ‖a‖₊ = 0 ↔ a = 1 := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_eq_zero, coe_nnnorm', norm_eq_zero']
@[to_additive nnnorm_ne_zero_iff]
theorem nnnorm_ne_zero_iff' : ‖a‖₊ ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 1 :=
nnnorm_eq_zero'.not
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_pos]
lemma nnnorm_pos' : 0 < ‖a‖₊ ↔ a ≠ 1 := pos_iff_ne_zero.trans nnnorm_ne_zero_iff'
variable (E)
/-- The norm of a normed group as a group norm. -/
@[to_additive "The norm of a normed group as an additive group norm."]
def normGroupNorm : GroupNorm E :=
{ normGroupSeminorm _ with eq_one_of_map_eq_zero' := fun _ => norm_eq_zero'.1 }
@[simp]
theorem coe_normGroupNorm : ⇑(normGroupNorm E) = norm :=
rfl
end NormedGroup
section NormedAddGroup
variable [NormedAddGroup E] [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → E}
/-! Some relations with `HasCompactSupport` -/
theorem hasCompactSupport_norm_iff : (HasCompactSupport fun x => ‖f x‖) ↔ HasCompactSupport f :=
hasCompactSupport_comp_left norm_eq_zero
alias ⟨_, HasCompactSupport.norm⟩ := hasCompactSupport_norm_iff
end NormedAddGroup
lemma tendsto_norm_atTop_atTop : Tendsto (norm : ℝ → ℝ) atTop atTop := tendsto_abs_atTop_atTop
/-! ### `positivity` extensions -/
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq Function
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: multiplicative norms are always nonnegative, and positive
on non-one inputs. -/
@[positivity ‖_‖]
def evalMulNorm : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _ _ e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(@Norm.norm $E $_n $a) =>
let _seminormedGroup_E ← synthInstanceQ q(SeminormedGroup $E)
assertInstancesCommute
-- Check whether we are in a normed group and whether the context contains a `a ≠ 1` assumption
let o : Option (Q(NormedGroup $E) × Q($a ≠ 1)) := ← do
let .some normedGroup_E ← trySynthInstanceQ q(NormedGroup $E) | return none
let some pa ← findLocalDeclWithTypeQ? q($a ≠ 1) | return none
return some (normedGroup_E, pa)
| match o with
-- If so, return a proof of `0 < ‖a‖`
| some (_normedGroup_E, pa) =>
assertInstancesCommute
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/Basic.lean | 1,339 | 1,342 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yakov Pechersky. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.List
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.OfMap
/-!
# Cycles of a list
Lists have an equivalence relation of whether they are rotational permutations of one another.
This relation is defined as `IsRotated`.
Based on this, we define the quotient of lists by the rotation relation, called `Cycle`.
We also define a representation of concrete cycles, available when viewing them in a goal state or
via `#eval`, when over representable types. For example, the cycle `(2 1 4 3)` will be shown
as `c[2, 1, 4, 3]`. Two equal cycles may be printed differently if their internal representation
is different.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
namespace List
variable {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α]
/-- Return the `z` such that `x :: z :: _` appears in `xs`, or `default` if there is no such `z`. -/
def nextOr : ∀ (_ : List α) (_ _ : α), α
| [], _, default => default
| [_], _, default => default
-- Handles the not-found and the wraparound case
| y :: z :: xs, x, default => if x = y then z else nextOr (z :: xs) x default
@[simp]
theorem nextOr_nil (x d : α) : nextOr [] x d = d :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem nextOr_singleton (x y d : α) : nextOr [y] x d = d :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem nextOr_self_cons_cons (xs : List α) (x y d : α) : nextOr (x :: y :: xs) x d = y :=
if_pos rfl
theorem nextOr_cons_of_ne (xs : List α) (y x d : α) (h : x ≠ y) :
nextOr (y :: xs) x d = nextOr xs x d := by
rcases xs with - | ⟨z, zs⟩
· rfl
· exact if_neg h
/-- `nextOr` does not depend on the default value, if the next value appears. -/
theorem nextOr_eq_nextOr_of_mem_of_ne (xs : List α) (x d d' : α) (x_mem : x ∈ xs)
(x_ne : x ≠ xs.getLast (ne_nil_of_mem x_mem)) : nextOr xs x d = nextOr xs x d' := by
induction' xs with y ys IH
· cases x_mem
rcases ys with - | ⟨z, zs⟩
· simp at x_mem x_ne
contradiction
by_cases h : x = y
· rw [h, nextOr_self_cons_cons, nextOr_self_cons_cons]
· rw [nextOr, nextOr, IH]
· simpa [h] using x_mem
· simpa using x_ne
theorem mem_of_nextOr_ne {xs : List α} {x d : α} (h : nextOr xs x d ≠ d) : x ∈ xs := by
induction' xs with y ys IH
· simp at h
rcases ys with - | ⟨z, zs⟩
· simp at h
· by_cases hx : x = y
· simp [hx]
· rw [nextOr_cons_of_ne _ _ _ _ hx] at h
simpa [hx] using IH h
theorem nextOr_concat {xs : List α} {x : α} (d : α) (h : x ∉ xs) : nextOr (xs ++ [x]) x d = d := by
induction' xs with z zs IH
· simp
· obtain ⟨hz, hzs⟩ := not_or.mp (mt mem_cons.2 h)
rw [cons_append, nextOr_cons_of_ne _ _ _ _ hz, IH hzs]
theorem nextOr_mem {xs : List α} {x d : α} (hd : d ∈ xs) : nextOr xs x d ∈ xs := by
revert hd
suffices ∀ xs' : List α, (∀ x ∈ xs, x ∈ xs') → d ∈ xs' → nextOr xs x d ∈ xs' by
exact this xs fun _ => id
intro xs' hxs' hd
induction' xs with y ys ih
· exact hd
rcases ys with - | ⟨z, zs⟩
· exact hd
rw [nextOr]
split_ifs with h
· exact hxs' _ (mem_cons_of_mem _ mem_cons_self)
· exact ih fun _ h => hxs' _ (mem_cons_of_mem _ h)
/-- Given an element `x : α` of `l : List α` such that `x ∈ l`, get the next
element of `l`. This works from head to tail, (including a check for last element)
so it will match on first hit, ignoring later duplicates.
For example:
* `next [1, 2, 3] 2 _ = 3`
* `next [1, 2, 3] 3 _ = 1`
* `next [1, 2, 3, 2, 4] 2 _ = 3`
* `next [1, 2, 3, 2] 2 _ = 3`
* `next [1, 1, 2, 3, 2] 1 _ = 1`
-/
def next (l : List α) (x : α) (h : x ∈ l) : α :=
nextOr l x (l.get ⟨0, length_pos_of_mem h⟩)
/-- Given an element `x : α` of `l : List α` such that `x ∈ l`, get the previous
element of `l`. This works from head to tail, (including a check for last element)
so it will match on first hit, ignoring later duplicates.
* `prev [1, 2, 3] 2 _ = 1`
* `prev [1, 2, 3] 1 _ = 3`
* `prev [1, 2, 3, 2, 4] 2 _ = 1`
* `prev [1, 2, 3, 4, 2] 2 _ = 1`
* `prev [1, 1, 2] 1 _ = 2`
-/
def prev : ∀ l : List α, ∀ x ∈ l, α
| [], _, h => by simp at h
| [y], _, _ => y
| y :: z :: xs, x, h =>
if hx : x = y then getLast (z :: xs) (cons_ne_nil _ _)
else if x = z then y else prev (z :: xs) x (by simpa [hx] using h)
variable (l : List α) (x : α)
@[simp]
theorem next_singleton (x y : α) (h : x ∈ [y]) : next [y] x h = y :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem prev_singleton (x y : α) (h : x ∈ [y]) : prev [y] x h = y :=
rfl
theorem next_cons_cons_eq' (y z : α) (h : x ∈ y :: z :: l) (hx : x = y) :
next (y :: z :: l) x h = z := by rw [next, nextOr, if_pos hx]
@[simp]
theorem next_cons_cons_eq (z : α) (h : x ∈ x :: z :: l) : next (x :: z :: l) x h = z :=
next_cons_cons_eq' l x x z h rfl
theorem next_ne_head_ne_getLast (h : x ∈ l) (y : α) (h : x ∈ y :: l) (hy : x ≠ y)
(hx : x ≠ getLast (y :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)) :
next (y :: l) x h = next l x (by simpa [hy] using h) := by
rw [next, next, nextOr_cons_of_ne _ _ _ _ hy, nextOr_eq_nextOr_of_mem_of_ne]
· rwa [getLast_cons] at hx
exact ne_nil_of_mem (by assumption)
· rwa [getLast_cons] at hx
theorem next_cons_concat (y : α) (hy : x ≠ y) (hx : x ∉ l)
(h : x ∈ y :: l ++ [x] := mem_append_right _ (mem_singleton_self x)) :
next (y :: l ++ [x]) x h = y := by
rw [next, nextOr_concat]
· rfl
· simp [hy, hx]
theorem next_getLast_cons (h : x ∈ l) (y : α) (h : x ∈ y :: l) (hy : x ≠ y)
(hx : x = getLast (y :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)) (hl : Nodup l) : next (y :: l) x h = y := by
rw [next, get, ← dropLast_append_getLast (cons_ne_nil y l), hx, nextOr_concat]
subst hx
intro H
obtain ⟨_ | k, hk, hk'⟩ := getElem_of_mem H
· rw [← Option.some_inj] at hk'
rw [← getElem?_eq_getElem, dropLast_eq_take, getElem?_take_of_lt, getElem?_cons_zero,
Option.some_inj] at hk'
· exact hy (Eq.symm hk')
rw [length_cons]
exact length_pos_of_mem (by assumption)
suffices k + 1 = l.length by simp [this] at hk
rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp at hk
· rw [nodup_iff_injective_get] at hl
rw [length, Nat.succ_inj]
refine Fin.val_eq_of_eq <| @hl ⟨k, Nat.lt_of_succ_lt <| by simpa using hk⟩
⟨tl.length, by simp⟩ ?_
rw [← Option.some_inj] at hk'
rw [← getElem?_eq_getElem, dropLast_eq_take, getElem?_take_of_lt, getElem?_cons_succ,
getElem?_eq_getElem, Option.some_inj] at hk'
· rw [get_eq_getElem, hk']
simp only [getLast_eq_getElem, length_cons, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub,
Nat.sub_zero, get_eq_getElem, getElem_cons_succ]
simpa using hk
theorem prev_getLast_cons' (y : α) (hxy : x ∈ y :: l) (hx : x = y) :
prev (y :: l) x hxy = getLast (y :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) := by cases l <;> simp [prev, hx]
@[simp]
theorem prev_getLast_cons (h : x ∈ x :: l) :
prev (x :: l) x h = getLast (x :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) :=
prev_getLast_cons' l x x h rfl
theorem prev_cons_cons_eq' (y z : α) (h : x ∈ y :: z :: l) (hx : x = y) :
prev (y :: z :: l) x h = getLast (z :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) := by rw [prev, dif_pos hx]
theorem prev_cons_cons_eq (z : α) (h : x ∈ x :: z :: l) :
prev (x :: z :: l) x h = getLast (z :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) :=
prev_cons_cons_eq' l x x z h rfl
theorem prev_cons_cons_of_ne' (y z : α) (h : x ∈ y :: z :: l) (hy : x ≠ y) (hz : x = z) :
prev (y :: z :: l) x h = y := by
cases l
· simp [prev, hy, hz]
· rw [prev, dif_neg hy, if_pos hz]
theorem prev_cons_cons_of_ne (y : α) (h : x ∈ y :: x :: l) (hy : x ≠ y) :
prev (y :: x :: l) x h = y :=
prev_cons_cons_of_ne' _ _ _ _ _ hy rfl
theorem prev_ne_cons_cons (y z : α) (h : x ∈ y :: z :: l) (hy : x ≠ y) (hz : x ≠ z) :
prev (y :: z :: l) x h = prev (z :: l) x (by simpa [hy] using h) := by
cases l
· simp [hy, hz] at h
· rw [prev, dif_neg hy, if_neg hz]
theorem next_mem (h : x ∈ l) : l.next x h ∈ l :=
nextOr_mem (get_mem _ _)
theorem prev_mem (h : x ∈ l) : l.prev x h ∈ l := by
rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp at h
induction' tl with hd' tl hl generalizing hd
· simp
· by_cases hx : x = hd
· simp only [hx, prev_cons_cons_eq]
exact mem_cons_of_mem _ (getLast_mem _)
· rw [prev, dif_neg hx]
split_ifs with hm
· exact mem_cons_self
· exact mem_cons_of_mem _ (hl _ _)
theorem next_getElem (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (i : Nat) (hi : i < l.length) :
next l l[i] (get_mem _ _) =
(l[(i + 1) % l.length]'(Nat.mod_lt _ (i.zero_le.trans_lt hi))) :=
match l, h, i, hi with
| [], _, i, hi => by simp at hi
| [_], _, _, _ => by simp
| x::y::l, _h, 0, h0 => by
have h₁ : (x :: y :: l)[0] = x := by simp
rw [next_cons_cons_eq' _ _ _ _ _ h₁]
simp
| x::y::l, hn, i+1, hi => by
have hx' : (x :: y :: l)[i+1] ≠ x := by
intro H
suffices (i + 1 : ℕ) = 0 by simpa
rw [nodup_iff_injective_get] at hn
refine Fin.val_eq_of_eq (@hn ⟨i + 1, hi⟩ ⟨0, by simp⟩ ?_)
simpa using H
have hi' : i ≤ l.length := Nat.le_of_lt_succ (Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.1 hi)
rcases hi'.eq_or_lt with (hi' | hi')
· subst hi'
rw [next_getLast_cons]
· simp [hi', get]
· rw [getElem_cons_succ]; exact get_mem _ _
· exact hx'
· simp [getLast_eq_getElem]
· exact hn.of_cons
· rw [next_ne_head_ne_getLast _ _ _ _ _ hx']
· simp only [getElem_cons_succ]
rw [next_getElem (y::l), ← getElem_cons_succ (a := x)]
· congr
dsimp
rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.2 hi'),
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.2 (Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.2 hi'))]
· simp [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.2 hi'), hi']
· exact hn.of_cons
· rw [getLast_eq_getElem]
intro h
have := nodup_iff_injective_get.1 hn h
simp at this; simp [this] at hi'
· rw [getElem_cons_succ]; exact get_mem _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-015")] alias next_get := next_getElem
-- Unused variable linter incorrectly reports that `h` is unused here.
set_option linter.unusedVariables false in
theorem prev_getElem (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (i : Nat) (hi : i < l.length) :
prev l l[i] (get_mem _ _) =
(l[(i + (l.length - 1)) % l.length]'(Nat.mod_lt _ (by omega))) :=
match l with
| [] => by simp at hi
| x::l => by
induction l generalizing i x with
| nil => simp
| cons y l hl =>
rcases i with (_ | _ | i)
· simp [getLast_eq_getElem]
· simp only [mem_cons, nodup_cons] at h
push_neg at h
simp only [zero_add, getElem_cons_succ, getElem_cons_zero,
List.prev_cons_cons_of_ne _ _ _ _ h.left.left.symm, length, add_comm,
Nat.add_sub_cancel_left, Nat.mod_self]
· rw [prev_ne_cons_cons]
· convert hl i.succ y h.of_cons (Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ hi) using 1
have : ∀ k hk, (y :: l)[k] = (x :: y :: l)[k + 1]'(Nat.succ_lt_succ hk) := by
simp
rw [this]
congr
simp only [Nat.add_succ_sub_one, add_zero, length]
simp only [length, Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff] at hi
set k := l.length
rw [Nat.succ_add, ← Nat.add_succ, Nat.add_mod_right, Nat.succ_add, ← Nat.add_succ _ k,
Nat.add_mod_right, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
· exact Nat.lt_succ_of_lt hi
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.lt_succ_of_lt hi)
· intro H
suffices i.succ.succ = 0 by simpa
suffices Fin.mk _ hi = ⟨0, by omega⟩ by rwa [Fin.mk.inj_iff] at this
rw [nodup_iff_injective_get] at h
apply h; rw [← H]; simp
· intro H
suffices i.succ.succ = 1 by simpa
suffices Fin.mk _ hi = ⟨1, by omega⟩ by rwa [Fin.mk.inj_iff] at this
rw [nodup_iff_injective_get] at h
apply h; rw [← H]; simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-15")] alias prev_get := prev_getElem
theorem pmap_next_eq_rotate_one (h : Nodup l) : (l.pmap l.next fun _ h => h) = l.rotate 1 := by
apply List.ext_getElem
· simp
· intros
rw [getElem_pmap, getElem_rotate, next_getElem _ h]
theorem pmap_prev_eq_rotate_length_sub_one (h : Nodup l) :
(l.pmap l.prev fun _ h => h) = l.rotate (l.length - 1) := by
apply List.ext_getElem
· simp
· intro n hn hn'
rw [getElem_rotate, getElem_pmap, prev_getElem _ h]
theorem prev_next (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ l) :
prev l (next l x hx) (next_mem _ _ _) = x := by
obtain ⟨n, hn, rfl⟩ := getElem_of_mem hx
simp only [next_getElem, prev_getElem, h, Nat.mod_add_mod]
rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp at hn
· have : (n + 1 + length tl) % (length tl + 1) = n := by
rw [length_cons] at hn
rw [add_assoc, add_comm 1, Nat.add_mod_right, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hn]
simp only [length_cons, Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub, Nat.sub_zero, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, this]
theorem next_prev (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ l) :
next l (prev l x hx) (prev_mem _ _ _) = x := by
obtain ⟨n, hn, rfl⟩ := getElem_of_mem hx
simp only [next_getElem, prev_getElem, h, Nat.mod_add_mod]
rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp at hn
· have : (n + length tl + 1) % (length tl + 1) = n := by
rw [length_cons] at hn
rw [add_assoc, Nat.add_mod_right, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hn]
simp [this]
theorem prev_reverse_eq_next (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ l) :
prev l.reverse x (mem_reverse.mpr hx) = next l x hx := by
obtain ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩ := getElem_of_mem hx
have lpos : 0 < l.length := k.zero_le.trans_lt hk
have key : l.length - 1 - k < l.length := by omega
rw [← getElem_pmap l.next (fun _ h => h) (by simpa using hk)]
simp_rw [getElem_eq_getElem_reverse (l := l), pmap_next_eq_rotate_one _ h]
rw [← getElem_pmap l.reverse.prev fun _ h => h]
· simp_rw [pmap_prev_eq_rotate_length_sub_one _ (nodup_reverse.mpr h), rotate_reverse,
length_reverse, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (Nat.sub_lt lpos Nat.succ_pos'),
Nat.sub_sub_self (Nat.succ_le_of_lt lpos)]
rw [getElem_eq_getElem_reverse]
· simp [Nat.sub_sub_self (Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt hk)]
· simpa
theorem next_reverse_eq_prev (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ l) :
next l.reverse x (mem_reverse.mpr hx) = prev l x hx := by
convert (prev_reverse_eq_next l.reverse (nodup_reverse.mpr h) x (mem_reverse.mpr hx)).symm
exact (reverse_reverse l).symm
theorem isRotated_next_eq {l l' : List α} (h : l ~r l') (hn : Nodup l) {x : α} (hx : x ∈ l) :
l.next x hx = l'.next x (h.mem_iff.mp hx) := by
obtain ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩ := getElem_of_mem hx
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := id h
rw [next_getElem _ hn]
simp_rw [getElem_eq_getElem_rotate _ n k]
rw [next_getElem _ (h.nodup_iff.mp hn), getElem_eq_getElem_rotate _ n]
simp [add_assoc]
theorem isRotated_prev_eq {l l' : List α} (h : l ~r l') (hn : Nodup l) {x : α} (hx : x ∈ l) :
l.prev x hx = l'.prev x (h.mem_iff.mp hx) := by
rw [← next_reverse_eq_prev _ hn, ← next_reverse_eq_prev _ (h.nodup_iff.mp hn)]
exact isRotated_next_eq h.reverse (nodup_reverse.mpr hn) _
end List
open List
/-- `Cycle α` is the quotient of `List α` by cyclic permutation.
Duplicates are allowed.
-/
def Cycle (α : Type*) : Type _ :=
Quotient (IsRotated.setoid α)
namespace Cycle
variable {α : Type*}
/-- The coercion from `List α` to `Cycle α` -/
@[coe] def ofList : List α → Cycle α :=
Quot.mk _
instance : Coe (List α) (Cycle α) :=
⟨ofList⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_eq_coe {l₁ l₂ : List α} : (l₁ : Cycle α) = (l₂ : Cycle α) ↔ l₁ ~r l₂ :=
@Quotient.eq _ (IsRotated.setoid _) _ _
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_coe (l : List α) : Quot.mk _ l = (l : Cycle α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk''_eq_coe (l : List α) : Quotient.mk'' l = (l : Cycle α) :=
rfl
theorem coe_cons_eq_coe_append (l : List α) (a : α) :
(↑(a :: l) : Cycle α) = (↑(l ++ [a]) : Cycle α) :=
Quot.sound ⟨1, by rw [rotate_cons_succ, rotate_zero]⟩
/-- The unique empty cycle. -/
def nil : Cycle α :=
([] : List α)
@[simp]
theorem coe_nil : ↑([] : List α) = @nil α :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_eq_nil (l : List α) : (l : Cycle α) = nil ↔ l = [] :=
coe_eq_coe.trans isRotated_nil_iff
/-- For consistency with `EmptyCollection (List α)`. -/
instance : EmptyCollection (Cycle α) :=
⟨nil⟩
@[simp]
theorem empty_eq : ∅ = @nil α :=
rfl
instance : Inhabited (Cycle α) :=
⟨nil⟩
/-- An induction principle for `Cycle`. Use as `induction s`. -/
@[elab_as_elim, induction_eliminator]
theorem induction_on {C : Cycle α → Prop} (s : Cycle α) (H0 : C nil)
(HI : ∀ (a) (l : List α), C ↑l → C ↑(a :: l)) : C s :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s fun l => by
refine List.recOn l ?_ ?_ <;> simp only [mk''_eq_coe, coe_nil]
assumption'
/-- For `x : α`, `s : Cycle α`, `x ∈ s` indicates that `x` occurs at least once in `s`. -/
def Mem (s : Cycle α) (a : α) : Prop :=
Quot.liftOn s (fun l => a ∈ l) fun _ _ e => propext <| e.mem_iff
instance : Membership α (Cycle α) :=
⟨Mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_coe_iff {a : α} {l : List α} : a ∈ (↑l : Cycle α) ↔ a ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_nil (a : α) : a ∉ nil :=
List.not_mem_nil
instance [DecidableEq α] : DecidableEq (Cycle α) := fun s₁ s₂ =>
Quotient.recOnSubsingleton₂' s₁ s₂ fun _ _ => decidable_of_iff' _ Quotient.eq''
instance [DecidableEq α] (x : α) (s : Cycle α) : Decidable (x ∈ s) :=
Quotient.recOnSubsingleton' s fun l => show Decidable (x ∈ l) from inferInstance
/-- Reverse a `s : Cycle α` by reversing the underlying `List`. -/
nonrec def reverse (s : Cycle α) : Cycle α :=
Quot.map reverse (fun _ _ => IsRotated.reverse) s
@[simp]
theorem reverse_coe (l : List α) : (l : Cycle α).reverse = l.reverse :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_reverse_iff {a : α} {s : Cycle α} : a ∈ s.reverse ↔ a ∈ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _ => mem_reverse
@[simp]
theorem reverse_reverse (s : Cycle α) : s.reverse.reverse = s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _ => by simp
@[simp]
theorem reverse_nil : nil.reverse = @nil α :=
rfl
/-- The length of the `s : Cycle α`, which is the number of elements, counting duplicates. -/
def length (s : Cycle α) : ℕ :=
Quot.liftOn s List.length fun _ _ e => e.perm.length_eq
@[simp]
theorem length_coe (l : List α) : length (l : Cycle α) = l.length :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem length_nil : length (@nil α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem length_reverse (s : Cycle α) : s.reverse.length = s.length :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _ => List.length_reverse
/-- A `s : Cycle α` that is at most one element. -/
def Subsingleton (s : Cycle α) : Prop :=
s.length ≤ 1
theorem subsingleton_nil : Subsingleton (@nil α) := Nat.zero_le _
theorem length_subsingleton_iff {s : Cycle α} : Subsingleton s ↔ length s ≤ 1 :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem subsingleton_reverse_iff {s : Cycle α} : s.reverse.Subsingleton ↔ s.Subsingleton := by
simp [length_subsingleton_iff]
theorem Subsingleton.congr {s : Cycle α} (h : Subsingleton s) :
∀ ⦃x⦄ (_hx : x ∈ s) ⦃y⦄ (_hy : y ∈ s), x = y := by
induction' s using Quot.inductionOn with l
simp only [length_subsingleton_iff, length_coe, mk_eq_coe, le_iff_lt_or_eq, Nat.lt_add_one_iff,
length_eq_zero_iff, length_eq_one_iff, Nat.not_lt_zero, false_or] at h
rcases h with (rfl | ⟨z, rfl⟩) <;> simp
/-- A `s : Cycle α` that is made up of at least two unique elements. -/
def Nontrivial (s : Cycle α) : Prop :=
∃ x y : α, x ≠ y ∧ x ∈ s ∧ y ∈ s
@[simp]
theorem nontrivial_coe_nodup_iff {l : List α} (hl : l.Nodup) :
Nontrivial (l : Cycle α) ↔ 2 ≤ l.length := by
rw [Nontrivial]
rcases l with (_ | ⟨hd, _ | ⟨hd', tl⟩⟩)
· simp
· simp
· simp only [mem_cons, exists_prop, mem_coe_iff, List.length, Ne, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff,
Nat.zero_le, iff_true]
refine ⟨hd, hd', ?_, by simp⟩
simp only [not_or, mem_cons, nodup_cons] at hl
exact hl.left.left
@[simp]
theorem nontrivial_reverse_iff {s : Cycle α} : s.reverse.Nontrivial ↔ s.Nontrivial := by
simp [Nontrivial]
theorem length_nontrivial {s : Cycle α} (h : Nontrivial s) : 2 ≤ length s := by
obtain ⟨x, y, hxy, hx, hy⟩ := h
induction' s using Quot.inductionOn with l
rcases l with (_ | ⟨hd, _ | ⟨hd', tl⟩⟩)
· simp at hx
· simp only [mem_coe_iff, mk_eq_coe, mem_singleton] at hx hy
simp [hx, hy] at hxy
· simp [Nat.succ_le_succ_iff]
/-- The `s : Cycle α` contains no duplicates. -/
nonrec def Nodup (s : Cycle α) : Prop :=
Quot.liftOn s Nodup fun _l₁ _l₂ e => propext <| e.nodup_iff
@[simp]
nonrec theorem nodup_nil : Nodup (@nil α) :=
nodup_nil
@[simp]
theorem nodup_coe_iff {l : List α} : Nodup (l : Cycle α) ↔ l.Nodup :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem nodup_reverse_iff {s : Cycle α} : s.reverse.Nodup ↔ s.Nodup :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _ => nodup_reverse
theorem Subsingleton.nodup {s : Cycle α} (h : Subsingleton s) : Nodup s := by
induction' s using Quot.inductionOn with l
obtain - | ⟨hd, tl⟩ := l
· simp
· have : tl = [] := by simpa [Subsingleton, length_eq_zero_iff, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff] using h
simp [this]
theorem Nodup.nontrivial_iff {s : Cycle α} (h : Nodup s) : Nontrivial s ↔ ¬Subsingleton s := by
rw [length_subsingleton_iff]
induction s using Quotient.inductionOn'
simp only [mk''_eq_coe, nodup_coe_iff] at h
simp [h, Nat.succ_le_iff]
/-- The `s : Cycle α` as a `Multiset α`.
-/
def toMultiset (s : Cycle α) : Multiset α :=
Quotient.liftOn' s (↑) fun _ _ h => Multiset.coe_eq_coe.mpr h.perm
@[simp]
theorem coe_toMultiset (l : List α) : (l : Cycle α).toMultiset = l :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem nil_toMultiset : nil.toMultiset = (0 : Multiset α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_toMultiset (s : Cycle α) : Multiset.card s.toMultiset = s.length :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem toMultiset_eq_nil {s : Cycle α} : s.toMultiset = 0 ↔ s = Cycle.nil :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s (by simp)
/-- The lift of `list.map`. -/
def map {β : Type*} (f : α → β) : Cycle α → Cycle β :=
Quotient.map' (List.map f) fun _ _ h => h.map _
@[simp]
theorem map_nil {β : Type*} (f : α → β) : map f nil = nil :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_coe {β : Type*} (f : α → β) (l : List α) : map f ↑l = List.map f l :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_nil {β : Type*} (f : α → β) (s : Cycle α) : map f s = nil ↔ s = nil :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {β : Type*} {f : α → β} {b : β} {s : Cycle α} :
b ∈ s.map f ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = b :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s (by simp)
/-- The `Multiset` of lists that can make the cycle. -/
def lists (s : Cycle α) : Multiset (List α) :=
Quotient.liftOn' s (fun l => (l.cyclicPermutations : Multiset (List α))) fun l₁ l₂ h => by
simpa using h.cyclicPermutations.perm
@[simp]
theorem lists_coe (l : List α) : lists (l : Cycle α) = ↑l.cyclicPermutations :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_lists_iff_coe_eq {s : Cycle α} {l : List α} : l ∈ s.lists ↔ (l : Cycle α) = s :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s fun l => by
rw [lists, Quotient.liftOn'_mk'']
simp
@[simp]
theorem lists_nil : lists (@nil α) = {([] : List α)} := by
rw [nil, lists_coe, cyclicPermutations_nil, Multiset.coe_singleton]
section Decidable
variable [DecidableEq α]
/-- Auxiliary decidability algorithm for lists that contain at least two unique elements.
-/
def decidableNontrivialCoe : ∀ l : List α, Decidable (Nontrivial (l : Cycle α))
| [] => isFalse (by simp [Nontrivial])
| [x] => isFalse (by simp [Nontrivial])
| x :: y :: l =>
if h : x = y then
@decidable_of_iff' _ (Nontrivial (x :: l : Cycle α)) (by simp [h, Nontrivial])
(decidableNontrivialCoe (x :: l))
else isTrue ⟨x, y, h, by simp, by simp⟩
instance {s : Cycle α} : Decidable (Nontrivial s) :=
Quot.recOnSubsingleton s decidableNontrivialCoe
instance {s : Cycle α} : Decidable (Nodup s) :=
Quot.recOnSubsingleton s List.nodupDecidable
instance fintypeNodupCycle [Fintype α] : Fintype { s : Cycle α // s.Nodup } :=
Fintype.ofSurjective (fun l : { l : List α // l.Nodup } => ⟨l.val, by simpa using l.prop⟩)
fun ⟨s, hs⟩ => by
induction' s using Quotient.inductionOn' with s hs
exact ⟨⟨s, hs⟩, by simp⟩
instance fintypeNodupNontrivialCycle [Fintype α] :
Fintype { s : Cycle α // s.Nodup ∧ s.Nontrivial } :=
Fintype.subtype
(((Finset.univ : Finset { s : Cycle α // s.Nodup }).map (Function.Embedding.subtype _)).filter
Cycle.Nontrivial)
(by simp)
/-- The `s : Cycle α` as a `Finset α`. -/
def toFinset (s : Cycle α) : Finset α :=
s.toMultiset.toFinset
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_toMultiset (s : Cycle α) : s.toMultiset.toFinset = s.toFinset :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toFinset (l : List α) : (l : Cycle α).toFinset = l.toFinset :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem nil_toFinset : (@nil α).toFinset = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_eq_nil {s : Cycle α} : s.toFinset = ∅ ↔ s = Cycle.nil :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s (by simp)
/-- Given a `s : Cycle α` such that `Nodup s`, retrieve the next element after `x ∈ s`. -/
nonrec def next : ∀ (s : Cycle α) (_hs : Nodup s) (x : α) (_hx : x ∈ s), α := fun s =>
Quot.hrecOn (motive := fun (s : Cycle α) => ∀ (_hs : Cycle.Nodup s) (x : α) (_hx : x ∈ s), α) s
(fun l _hn x hx => next l x hx) fun l₁ l₂ h =>
Function.hfunext (propext h.nodup_iff) fun h₁ h₂ _he =>
Function.hfunext rfl fun x y hxy =>
Function.hfunext (propext (by rw [eq_of_heq hxy]; simpa [eq_of_heq hxy] using h.mem_iff))
fun hm hm' he' => heq_of_eq
(by rw [heq_iff_eq] at hxy; subst x; simpa using isRotated_next_eq h h₁ _)
/-- Given a `s : Cycle α` such that `Nodup s`, retrieve the previous element before `x ∈ s`. -/
nonrec def prev : ∀ (s : Cycle α) (_hs : Nodup s) (x : α) (_hx : x ∈ s), α := fun s =>
Quot.hrecOn (motive := fun (s : Cycle α) => ∀ (_hs : Cycle.Nodup s) (x : α) (_hx : x ∈ s), α) s
(fun l _hn x hx => prev l x hx) fun l₁ l₂ h =>
Function.hfunext (propext h.nodup_iff) fun h₁ h₂ _he =>
Function.hfunext rfl fun x y hxy =>
Function.hfunext (propext (by rw [eq_of_heq hxy]; simpa [eq_of_heq hxy] using h.mem_iff))
fun hm hm' he' => heq_of_eq
(by rw [heq_iff_eq] at hxy; subst x; simpa using isRotated_prev_eq h h₁ _)
-- `simp` cannot infer the proofs: see `prev_reverse_eq_next'` for `@[simp]` lemma.
nonrec theorem prev_reverse_eq_next (s : Cycle α) : ∀ (hs : Nodup s) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ s),
s.reverse.prev (nodup_reverse_iff.mpr hs) x (mem_reverse_iff.mpr hx) = s.next hs x hx :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s prev_reverse_eq_next
@[simp]
nonrec theorem prev_reverse_eq_next' (s : Cycle α) (hs : Nodup s.reverse) (x : α)
(hx : x ∈ s.reverse) :
s.reverse.prev hs x hx = s.next (nodup_reverse_iff.mp hs) x (mem_reverse_iff.mp hx) :=
prev_reverse_eq_next s (nodup_reverse_iff.mp hs) x (mem_reverse_iff.mp hx)
-- `simp` cannot infer the proofs: see `next_reverse_eq_prev'` for `@[simp]` lemma.
theorem next_reverse_eq_prev (s : Cycle α) (hs : Nodup s) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ s) :
s.reverse.next (nodup_reverse_iff.mpr hs) x (mem_reverse_iff.mpr hx) = s.prev hs x hx := by
simp [← prev_reverse_eq_next]
@[simp]
theorem next_reverse_eq_prev' (s : Cycle α) (hs : Nodup s.reverse) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ s.reverse) :
s.reverse.next hs x hx = s.prev (nodup_reverse_iff.mp hs) x (mem_reverse_iff.mp hx) := by
simp [← prev_reverse_eq_next]
@[simp]
nonrec theorem next_mem (s : Cycle α) (hs : Nodup s) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ s) : s.next hs x hx ∈ s := by
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
apply next_mem; assumption
theorem prev_mem (s : Cycle α) (hs : Nodup s) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ s) : s.prev hs x hx ∈ s := by
rw [← next_reverse_eq_prev, ← mem_reverse_iff]
apply next_mem
@[simp]
nonrec theorem prev_next (s : Cycle α) : ∀ (hs : Nodup s) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ s),
s.prev hs (s.next hs x hx) (next_mem s hs x hx) = x :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s prev_next
@[simp]
nonrec theorem next_prev (s : Cycle α) : ∀ (hs : Nodup s) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ s),
s.next hs (s.prev hs x hx) (prev_mem s hs x hx) = x :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s next_prev
end Decidable
/-- We define a representation of concrete cycles, available when viewing them in a goal state or
via `#eval`, when over representable types. For example, the cycle `(2 1 4 3)` will be shown
as `c[2, 1, 4, 3]`. Two equal cycles may be printed differently if their internal representation
is different.
-/
unsafe instance [Repr α] : Repr (Cycle α) :=
⟨fun s _ => "c[" ++ Std.Format.joinSep (s.map repr).lists.unquot.head! ", " ++ "]"⟩
/-- `chain R s` means that `R` holds between adjacent elements of `s`.
`chain R ([a, b, c] : Cycle α) ↔ R a b ∧ R b c ∧ R c a` -/
nonrec def Chain (r : α → α → Prop) (c : Cycle α) : Prop :=
Quotient.liftOn' c
(fun l =>
match l with
| [] => True
| a :: m => Chain r a (m ++ [a]))
fun a b hab =>
propext <| by
rcases a with - | ⟨a, l⟩ <;> rcases b with - | ⟨b, m⟩
· rfl
· have := isRotated_nil_iff'.1 hab
contradiction
· have := isRotated_nil_iff.1 hab
contradiction
· dsimp only
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := hab
induction' n with d hd generalizing a b l m
· simp only [rotate_zero, cons.injEq] at hn
rw [hn.1, hn.2]
· rcases l with - | ⟨c, s⟩
· simp only [rotate_cons_succ, nil_append, rotate_singleton, cons.injEq] at hn
rw [hn.1, hn.2]
· rw [Nat.add_comm, ← rotate_rotate, rotate_cons_succ, rotate_zero, cons_append] at hn
rw [← hd c _ _ _ hn]
simp [and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Chain.nil (r : α → α → Prop) : Cycle.Chain r (@nil α) := by trivial
@[simp]
theorem chain_coe_cons (r : α → α → Prop) (a : α) (l : List α) :
Chain r (a :: l) ↔ List.Chain r a (l ++ [a]) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem chain_singleton (r : α → α → Prop) (a : α) : Chain r [a] ↔ r a a := by
rw [chain_coe_cons, nil_append, List.chain_singleton]
theorem chain_ne_nil (r : α → α → Prop) {l : List α} :
∀ hl : l ≠ [], Chain r l ↔ List.Chain r (getLast l hl) l :=
l.reverseRecOn (fun hm => hm.irrefl.elim) (by
intro m a _H _
rw [← coe_cons_eq_coe_append, chain_coe_cons, getLast_append_singleton])
theorem chain_map {β : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop} (f : β → α) {s : Cycle β} :
Chain r (s.map f) ↔ Chain (fun a b => r (f a) (f b)) s :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l => by
rcases l with - | ⟨a, l⟩
· rfl
· simp [← concat_eq_append, ← List.map_concat, List.chain_map f]
nonrec theorem chain_range_succ (r : ℕ → ℕ → Prop) (n : ℕ) :
Chain r (List.range n.succ) ↔ r n 0 ∧ ∀ m < n, r m m.succ := by
rw [range_succ, ← coe_cons_eq_coe_append, chain_coe_cons, ← range_succ, chain_range_succ]
variable {r : α → α → Prop} {s : Cycle α}
theorem Chain.imp {r₁ r₂ : α → α → Prop} (H : ∀ a b, r₁ a b → r₂ a b) (p : Chain r₁ s) :
Chain r₂ s := by
induction s
· trivial
· rw [chain_coe_cons] at p ⊢
exact p.imp H
/-- As a function from a relation to a predicate, `chain` is monotonic. -/
theorem chain_mono : Monotone (Chain : (α → α → Prop) → Cycle α → Prop) := fun _a _b hab _s =>
Chain.imp hab
theorem chain_of_pairwise : (∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ s, r a b) → Chain r s := by
induction' s with a l _
· exact fun _ => Cycle.Chain.nil r
intro hs
have Ha : a ∈ (a :: l : Cycle α) := by simp
have Hl : ∀ {b} (_hb : b ∈ l), b ∈ (a :: l : Cycle α) := @fun b hb => by simp [hb]
rw [Cycle.chain_coe_cons]
apply Pairwise.chain
rw [pairwise_cons]
refine
⟨fun b hb => ?_,
pairwise_append.2
⟨pairwise_of_forall_mem_list fun b hb c hc => hs b (Hl hb) c (Hl hc),
| pairwise_singleton r a, fun b hb c hc => ?_⟩⟩
· rw [mem_append] at hb
rcases hb with hb | hb
| Mathlib/Data/List/Cycle.lean | 864 | 866 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Defs
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Basic
/-!
# Sigma types
This file proves basic results about sigma types.
A sigma type is a dependent pair type. Like `α × β` but where the type of the second component
depends on the first component. More precisely, given `β : ι → Type*`, `Sigma β` is made of stuff
which is of type `β i` for some `i : ι`, so the sigma type is a disjoint union of types.
For example, the sum type `X ⊕ Y` can be emulated using a sigma type, by taking `ι` with
exactly two elements (see `Equiv.sumEquivSigmaBool`).
`Σ x, A x` is notation for `Sigma A` (note that this is `\Sigma`, not the sum operator `∑`).
`Σ x y z ..., A x y z ...` is notation for `Σ x, Σ y, Σ z, ..., A x y z ...`. Here we have
`α : Type*`, `β : α → Type*`, `γ : Π a : α, β a → Type*`, ...,
`A : Π (a : α) (b : β a) (c : γ a b) ..., Type*` with `x : α` `y : β x`, `z : γ x y`, ...
## Notes
The definition of `Sigma` takes values in `Type*`. This effectively forbids `Prop`- valued sigma
types. To that effect, we have `PSigma`, which takes value in `Sort*` and carries a more
complicated universe signature as a consequence.
-/
open Function
section Sigma
variable {α α₁ α₂ : Type*} {β : α → Type*} {β₁ : α₁ → Type*} {β₂ : α₂ → Type*}
namespace Sigma
instance instInhabitedSigma [Inhabited α] [Inhabited (β default)] : Inhabited (Sigma β) :=
⟨⟨default, default⟩⟩
instance instDecidableEqSigma [h₁ : DecidableEq α] [h₂ : ∀ a, DecidableEq (β a)] :
DecidableEq (Sigma β)
| ⟨a₁, b₁⟩, ⟨a₂, b₂⟩ =>
match a₁, b₁, a₂, b₂, h₁ a₁ a₂ with
| _, b₁, _, b₂, isTrue (Eq.refl _) =>
match b₁, b₂, h₂ _ b₁ b₂ with
| _, _, isTrue (Eq.refl _) => isTrue rfl
| _, _, isFalse n => isFalse fun h ↦ Sigma.noConfusion h fun _ e₂ ↦ n <| eq_of_heq e₂
| _, _, _, _, isFalse n => isFalse fun h ↦ Sigma.noConfusion h fun e₁ _ ↦ n e₁
theorem mk.inj_iff {a₁ a₂ : α} {b₁ : β a₁} {b₂ : β a₂} :
Sigma.mk a₁ b₁ = ⟨a₂, b₂⟩ ↔ a₁ = a₂ ∧ HEq b₁ b₂ := by simp
@[simp]
theorem eta : ∀ x : Σa, β a, Sigma.mk x.1 x.2 = x
| ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
protected theorem eq {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*} : ∀ {p₁ p₂ : Σ a, β a} (h₁ : p₁.1 = p₂.1),
(Eq.recOn h₁ p₁.2 : β p₂.1) = p₂.2 → p₁ = p₂
| ⟨_, _⟩, _, rfl, rfl => rfl
/-- A version of `Iff.mp Sigma.ext_iff` for functions from a nonempty type to a sigma type. -/
theorem _root_.Function.eq_of_sigmaMk_comp {γ : Type*} [Nonempty γ]
{a b : α} {f : γ → β a} {g : γ → β b} (h : Sigma.mk a ∘ f = Sigma.mk b ∘ g) :
a = b ∧ HEq f g := by
rcases ‹Nonempty γ› with ⟨i⟩
obtain rfl : a = b := congr_arg Sigma.fst (congr_fun h i)
simpa [funext_iff] using h
/-- A specialized ext lemma for equality of sigma types over an indexed subtype. -/
@[ext]
theorem subtype_ext {β : Type*} {p : α → β → Prop} :
∀ {x₀ x₁ : Σa, Subtype (p a)}, x₀.fst = x₁.fst → (x₀.snd : β) = x₁.snd → x₀ = x₁
| ⟨_, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _⟩, rfl, rfl => rfl
-- This is not a good simp lemma, as its discrimination tree key is just an arrow.
theorem «forall» {p : (Σa, β a) → Prop} : (∀ x, p x) ↔ ∀ a b, p ⟨a, b⟩ :=
⟨fun h a b ↦ h ⟨a, b⟩, fun h ⟨a, b⟩ ↦ h a b⟩
@[simp]
theorem «exists» {p : (Σa, β a) → Prop} : (∃ x, p x) ↔ ∃ a b, p ⟨a, b⟩ :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨a, b⟩, h⟩ ↦ ⟨a, b, h⟩, fun ⟨a, b, h⟩ ↦ ⟨⟨a, b⟩, h⟩⟩
lemma exists' {p : ∀ a, β a → Prop} : (∃ a b, p a b) ↔ ∃ x : Σ a, β a, p x.1 x.2 :=
(Sigma.exists (p := fun x ↦ p x.1 x.2)).symm
lemma forall' {p : ∀ a, β a → Prop} : (∀ a b, p a b) ↔ ∀ x : Σ a, β a, p x.1 x.2 :=
(Sigma.forall (p := fun x ↦ p x.1 x.2)).symm
theorem _root_.sigma_mk_injective {i : α} : Injective (@Sigma.mk α β i)
| _, _, rfl => rfl
theorem fst_surjective [h : ∀ a, Nonempty (β a)] : Surjective (fst : (Σ a, β a) → α) := fun a ↦
let ⟨b⟩ := h a; ⟨⟨a, b⟩, rfl⟩
theorem fst_surjective_iff : Surjective (fst : (Σ a, β a) → α) ↔ ∀ a, Nonempty (β a) :=
⟨fun h a ↦ let ⟨x, hx⟩ := h a; hx ▸ ⟨x.2⟩, @fst_surjective _ _⟩
theorem fst_injective [h : ∀ a, Subsingleton (β a)] : Injective (fst : (Σ a, β a) → α) := by
rintro ⟨a₁, b₁⟩ ⟨a₂, b₂⟩ (rfl : a₁ = a₂)
exact congr_arg (mk a₁) <| Subsingleton.elim _ _
theorem fst_injective_iff : Injective (fst : (Σ a, β a) → α) ↔ ∀ a, Subsingleton (β a) :=
⟨fun h _ ↦ ⟨fun _ _ ↦ sigma_mk_injective <| h rfl⟩, @fst_injective _ _⟩
/-- Map the left and right components of a sigma -/
def map (f₁ : α₁ → α₂) (f₂ : ∀ a, β₁ a → β₂ (f₁ a)) (x : Sigma β₁) : Sigma β₂ :=
⟨f₁ x.1, f₂ x.1 x.2⟩
lemma map_mk (f₁ : α₁ → α₂) (f₂ : ∀ a, β₁ a → β₂ (f₁ a)) (x : α₁) (y : β₁ x) :
map f₁ f₂ ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨f₁ x, f₂ x y⟩ := rfl
end Sigma
theorem Function.Injective.sigma_map {f₁ : α₁ → α₂} {f₂ : ∀ a, β₁ a → β₂ (f₁ a)}
(h₁ : Injective f₁) (h₂ : ∀ a, Injective (f₂ a)) : Injective (Sigma.map f₁ f₂)
| ⟨i, x⟩, ⟨j, y⟩, h => by
obtain rfl : i = j := h₁ (Sigma.mk.inj_iff.mp h).1
obtain rfl : x = y := h₂ i (sigma_mk_injective h)
rfl
theorem Function.Injective.of_sigma_map {f₁ : α₁ → α₂} {f₂ : ∀ a, β₁ a → β₂ (f₁ a)}
(h : Injective (Sigma.map f₁ f₂)) (a : α₁) : Injective (f₂ a) := fun x y hxy ↦
sigma_mk_injective <| @h ⟨a, x⟩ ⟨a, y⟩ (Sigma.ext rfl (heq_of_eq hxy))
theorem Function.Injective.sigma_map_iff {f₁ : α₁ → α₂} {f₂ : ∀ a, β₁ a → β₂ (f₁ a)}
(h₁ : Injective f₁) : Injective (Sigma.map f₁ f₂) ↔ ∀ a, Injective (f₂ a) :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.of_sigma_map, h₁.sigma_map⟩
theorem Function.Surjective.sigma_map {f₁ : α₁ → α₂} {f₂ : ∀ a, β₁ a → β₂ (f₁ a)}
(h₁ : Surjective f₁) (h₂ : ∀ a, Surjective (f₂ a)) : Surjective (Sigma.map f₁ f₂) := by
simp only [Surjective, Sigma.forall, h₁.forall]
exact fun i ↦ (h₂ _).forall.2 fun x ↦ ⟨⟨i, x⟩, rfl⟩
/-- Interpret a function on `Σ x : α, β x` as a dependent function with two arguments.
This also exists as an `Equiv` as `Equiv.piCurry γ`. -/
def Sigma.curry {γ : ∀ a, β a → Type*} (f : ∀ x : Sigma β, γ x.1 x.2) (x : α) (y : β x) : γ x y :=
f ⟨x, y⟩
/-- Interpret a dependent function with two arguments as a function on `Σ x : α, β x`.
This also exists as an `Equiv` as `(Equiv.piCurry γ).symm`. -/
def Sigma.uncurry {γ : ∀ a, β a → Type*} (f : ∀ (x) (y : β x), γ x y) (x : Sigma β) : γ x.1 x.2 :=
f x.1 x.2
@[simp]
theorem Sigma.uncurry_curry {γ : ∀ a, β a → Type*} (f : ∀ x : Sigma β, γ x.1 x.2) :
Sigma.uncurry (Sigma.curry f) = f :=
funext fun ⟨_, _⟩ ↦ rfl
@[simp]
theorem Sigma.curry_uncurry {γ : ∀ a, β a → Type*} (f : ∀ (x) (y : β x), γ x y) :
Sigma.curry (Sigma.uncurry f) = f :=
rfl
theorem Sigma.curry_update {γ : ∀ a, β a → Type*} [DecidableEq α] [∀ a, DecidableEq (β a)]
(i : Σ a, β a) (f : (i : Σ a, β a) → γ i.1 i.2) (x : γ i.1 i.2) :
Sigma.curry (Function.update f i x) =
Function.update (Sigma.curry f) i.1 (Function.update (Sigma.curry f i.1) i.2 x) := by
obtain ⟨ia, ib⟩ := i
ext ja jb
unfold Sigma.curry
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne ia ja
· obtain rfl | hb := eq_or_ne ib jb
· simp
· simp only [update_self]
rw [Function.update_of_ne (mt _ hb.symm), Function.update_of_ne hb.symm]
rintro h
injection h
· rw [Function.update_of_ne (ne_of_apply_ne Sigma.fst _), Function.update_of_ne]
· exact ha.symm
· exact ha.symm
/-- Convert a product type to a Σ-type. -/
def Prod.toSigma {α β} (p : α × β) : Σ_ : α, β :=
⟨p.1, p.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem Prod.fst_comp_toSigma {α β} : Sigma.fst ∘ @Prod.toSigma α β = Prod.fst :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Prod.fst_toSigma {α β} (x : α × β) : (Prod.toSigma x).fst = x.fst :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Prod.snd_toSigma {α β} (x : α × β) : (Prod.toSigma x).snd = x.snd :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Prod.toSigma_mk {α β} (x : α) (y : β) : (x, y).toSigma = ⟨x, y⟩ :=
rfl
end Sigma
namespace PSigma
variable {α : Sort*} {β : α → Sort*}
/-- Nondependent eliminator for `PSigma`. -/
def elim {γ} (f : ∀ a, β a → γ) (a : PSigma β) : γ :=
PSigma.casesOn a f
@[simp]
theorem elim_val {γ} (f : ∀ a, β a → γ) (a b) : PSigma.elim f ⟨a, b⟩ = f a b :=
rfl
instance [Inhabited α] [Inhabited (β default)] : Inhabited (PSigma β) :=
⟨⟨default, default⟩⟩
instance decidableEq [h₁ : DecidableEq α] [h₂ : ∀ a, DecidableEq (β a)] : DecidableEq (PSigma β)
| ⟨a₁, b₁⟩, ⟨a₂, b₂⟩ =>
match a₁, b₁, a₂, b₂, h₁ a₁ a₂ with
| _, b₁, _, b₂, isTrue (Eq.refl _) =>
match b₁, b₂, h₂ _ b₁ b₂ with
| _, _, isTrue (Eq.refl _) => isTrue rfl
| _, _, isFalse n => isFalse fun h ↦ PSigma.noConfusion h fun _ e₂ ↦ n <| eq_of_heq e₂
| _, _, _, _, isFalse n => isFalse fun h ↦ PSigma.noConfusion h fun e₁ _ ↦ n e₁
theorem mk.inj_iff {a₁ a₂ : α} {b₁ : β a₁} {b₂ : β a₂} :
@PSigma.mk α β a₁ b₁ = @PSigma.mk α β a₂ b₂ ↔ a₁ = a₂ ∧ HEq b₁ b₂ :=
(Iff.intro PSigma.mk.inj) fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ ↦
match a₁, a₂, b₁, b₂, h₁, h₂ with
| _, _, _, _, Eq.refl _, HEq.refl _ => rfl
-- This should not be a simp lemma, since its discrimination tree key would just be `→`.
theorem «forall» {p : (Σ'a, β a) → Prop} : (∀ x, p x) ↔ ∀ a b, p ⟨a, b⟩ :=
⟨fun h a b ↦ h ⟨a, b⟩, fun h ⟨a, b⟩ ↦ h a b⟩
@[simp] lemma «exists» {p : (Σ' a, β a) → Prop} : (∃ x, p x) ↔ ∃ a b, p ⟨a, b⟩ :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨a, b⟩, h⟩ ↦ ⟨a, b, h⟩, fun ⟨a, b, h⟩ ↦ ⟨⟨a, b⟩, h⟩⟩
/-- A specialized ext lemma for equality of `PSigma` types over an indexed subtype. -/
@[ext]
theorem subtype_ext {β : Sort*} {p : α → β → Prop} :
∀ {x₀ x₁ : Σ'a, Subtype (p a)}, x₀.fst = x₁.fst → (x₀.snd : β) = x₁.snd → x₀ = x₁
| ⟨_, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _⟩, rfl, rfl => rfl
variable {α₁ : Sort*} {α₂ : Sort*} {β₁ : α₁ → Sort*} {β₂ : α₂ → Sort*}
/-- Map the left and right components of a sigma -/
def map (f₁ : α₁ → α₂) (f₂ : ∀ a, β₁ a → β₂ (f₁ a)) : PSigma β₁ → PSigma β₂
| ⟨a, b⟩ => ⟨f₁ a, f₂ a b⟩
end PSigma
| Mathlib/Data/Sigma/Basic.lean | 273 | 274 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yakov Pechersky. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Kenny Lau, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro, Kevin Buzzard,
Amelia Livingston, Yury Kudryashov, Yakov Pechersky, Jireh Loreaux
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Prod
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subsemigroup.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.TypeTags.Basic
/-!
# Operations on `Subsemigroup`s
In this file we define various operations on `Subsemigroup`s and `MulHom`s.
## Main definitions
### Conversion between multiplicative and additive definitions
* `Subsemigroup.toAddSubsemigroup`, `Subsemigroup.toAddSubsemigroup'`,
`AddSubsemigroup.toSubsemigroup`, `AddSubsemigroup.toSubsemigroup'`:
convert between multiplicative and additive subsemigroups of `M`,
`Multiplicative M`, and `Additive M`. These are stated as `OrderIso`s.
### (Commutative) semigroup structure on a subsemigroup
* `Subsemigroup.toSemigroup`, `Subsemigroup.toCommSemigroup`: a subsemigroup inherits a
(commutative) semigroup structure.
### Operations on subsemigroups
* `Subsemigroup.comap`: preimage of a subsemigroup under a semigroup homomorphism as a subsemigroup
of the domain;
* `Subsemigroup.map`: image of a subsemigroup under a semigroup homomorphism as a subsemigroup of
the codomain;
* `Subsemigroup.prod`: product of two subsemigroups `s : Subsemigroup M` and `t : Subsemigroup N`
as a subsemigroup of `M × N`;
### Semigroup homomorphisms between subsemigroups
* `Subsemigroup.subtype`: embedding of a subsemigroup into the ambient semigroup.
* `Subsemigroup.inclusion`: given two subsemigroups `S`, `T` such that `S ≤ T`, `S.inclusion T` is
the inclusion of `S` into `T` as a semigroup homomorphism;
* `MulEquiv.subsemigroupCongr`: converts a proof of `S = T` into a semigroup isomorphism between
`S` and `T`.
* `Subsemigroup.prodEquiv`: semigroup isomorphism between `s.prod t` and `s × t`;
### Operations on `MulHom`s
* `MulHom.srange`: range of a semigroup homomorphism as a subsemigroup of the codomain;
* `MulHom.restrict`: restrict a semigroup homomorphism to a subsemigroup;
* `MulHom.codRestrict`: restrict the codomain of a semigroup homomorphism to a subsemigroup;
* `MulHom.srangeRestrict`: restrict a semigroup homomorphism to its range;
### Implementation notes
This file follows closely `GroupTheory/Submonoid/Operations.lean`, omitting only that which is
necessary.
## Tags
subsemigroup, range, product, map, comap
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
variable {M N P σ : Type*}
/-!
### Conversion to/from `Additive`/`Multiplicative`
-/
section
variable [Mul M]
/-- Subsemigroups of semigroup `M` are isomorphic to additive subsemigroups of `Additive M`. -/
@[simps]
def Subsemigroup.toAddSubsemigroup : Subsemigroup M ≃o AddSubsemigroup (Additive M) where
toFun S :=
{ carrier := Additive.toMul ⁻¹' S
add_mem' := S.mul_mem' }
invFun S :=
{ carrier := Additive.ofMul ⁻¹' S
mul_mem' := S.add_mem' }
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl
/-- Additive subsemigroups of an additive semigroup `Additive M` are isomorphic to subsemigroups
of `M`. -/
abbrev AddSubsemigroup.toSubsemigroup' : AddSubsemigroup (Additive M) ≃o Subsemigroup M :=
Subsemigroup.toAddSubsemigroup.symm
theorem Subsemigroup.toAddSubsemigroup_closure (S : Set M) :
Subsemigroup.toAddSubsemigroup (Subsemigroup.closure S) =
AddSubsemigroup.closure (Additive.toMul ⁻¹' S) :=
le_antisymm
(Subsemigroup.toAddSubsemigroup.le_symm_apply.1 <|
Subsemigroup.closure_le.2 (AddSubsemigroup.subset_closure (M := Additive M)))
(AddSubsemigroup.closure_le.2 (Subsemigroup.subset_closure (M := M)))
theorem AddSubsemigroup.toSubsemigroup'_closure (S : Set (Additive M)) :
AddSubsemigroup.toSubsemigroup' (AddSubsemigroup.closure S) =
Subsemigroup.closure (Additive.ofMul ⁻¹' S) :=
le_antisymm
(AddSubsemigroup.toSubsemigroup'.le_symm_apply.1 <|
AddSubsemigroup.closure_le.2 (Subsemigroup.subset_closure (M := M)))
(Subsemigroup.closure_le.2 <| AddSubsemigroup.subset_closure (M := Additive M))
end
section
variable {A : Type*} [Add A]
/-- Additive subsemigroups of an additive semigroup `A` are isomorphic to
multiplicative subsemigroups of `Multiplicative A`. -/
@[simps]
def AddSubsemigroup.toSubsemigroup : AddSubsemigroup A ≃o Subsemigroup (Multiplicative A) where
toFun S :=
{ carrier := Multiplicative.toAdd ⁻¹' S
mul_mem' := S.add_mem' }
invFun S :=
{ carrier := Multiplicative.ofAdd ⁻¹' S
add_mem' := S.mul_mem' }
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl
/-- Subsemigroups of a semigroup `Multiplicative A` are isomorphic to additive subsemigroups
of `A`. -/
abbrev Subsemigroup.toAddSubsemigroup' : Subsemigroup (Multiplicative A) ≃o AddSubsemigroup A :=
AddSubsemigroup.toSubsemigroup.symm
theorem AddSubsemigroup.toSubsemigroup_closure (S : Set A) :
AddSubsemigroup.toSubsemigroup (AddSubsemigroup.closure S) =
Subsemigroup.closure (Multiplicative.toAdd ⁻¹' S) :=
le_antisymm
(AddSubsemigroup.toSubsemigroup.to_galoisConnection.l_le <|
AddSubsemigroup.closure_le.2 <| Subsemigroup.subset_closure (M := Multiplicative A))
(Subsemigroup.closure_le.2 <| AddSubsemigroup.subset_closure (M := A))
theorem Subsemigroup.toAddSubsemigroup'_closure (S : Set (Multiplicative A)) :
Subsemigroup.toAddSubsemigroup' (Subsemigroup.closure S) =
AddSubsemigroup.closure (Multiplicative.ofAdd ⁻¹' S) :=
le_antisymm
(Subsemigroup.toAddSubsemigroup'.to_galoisConnection.l_le <|
Subsemigroup.closure_le.2 <| AddSubsemigroup.subset_closure (M := A))
(AddSubsemigroup.closure_le.2 <| Subsemigroup.subset_closure (M := Multiplicative A))
end
namespace Subsemigroup
open Set
/-!
### `comap` and `map`
-/
variable [Mul M] [Mul N] [Mul P] (S : Subsemigroup M)
/-- The preimage of a subsemigroup along a semigroup homomorphism is a subsemigroup. -/
@[to_additive
"The preimage of an `AddSubsemigroup` along an `AddSemigroup` homomorphism is an
`AddSubsemigroup`."]
def comap (f : M →ₙ* N) (S : Subsemigroup N) :
Subsemigroup M where
carrier := f ⁻¹' S
mul_mem' ha hb := show f (_ * _) ∈ S by rw [map_mul]; exact mul_mem ha hb
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_comap (S : Subsemigroup N) (f : M →ₙ* N) : (S.comap f : Set M) = f ⁻¹' S :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_comap {S : Subsemigroup N} {f : M →ₙ* N} {x : M} : x ∈ S.comap f ↔ f x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_comap (S : Subsemigroup P) (g : N →ₙ* P) (f : M →ₙ* N) :
(S.comap g).comap f = S.comap (g.comp f) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem comap_id (S : Subsemigroup P) : S.comap (MulHom.id _) = S :=
ext (by simp)
/-- The image of a subsemigroup along a semigroup homomorphism is a subsemigroup. -/
@[to_additive
"The image of an `AddSubsemigroup` along an `AddSemigroup` homomorphism is
an `AddSubsemigroup`."]
def map (f : M →ₙ* N) (S : Subsemigroup M) : Subsemigroup N where
carrier := f '' S
mul_mem' := by
rintro _ _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
exact ⟨x * y, @mul_mem (Subsemigroup M) M _ _ _ _ _ _ hx hy, by rw [map_mul]⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_map (f : M →ₙ* N) (S : Subsemigroup M) : (S.map f : Set N) = f '' S :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_map {f : M →ₙ* N} {S : Subsemigroup M} {y : N} : y ∈ S.map f ↔ ∃ x ∈ S, f x = y :=
mem_image _ _ _
@[to_additive]
| theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : M →ₙ* N) {S : Subsemigroup M} {x : M} (hx : x ∈ S) : f x ∈ S.map f :=
mem_image_of_mem f hx
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Subsemigroup/Operations.lean | 211 | 212 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 David Wärn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Wärn, Joachim Breitner
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.End
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Pointwise.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Membership
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Congruence.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.FreeGroup.IsFreeGroup
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Basic
/-!
# The coproduct (a.k.a. the free product) of groups or monoids
Given an `ι`-indexed family `M` of monoids,
we define their coproduct (a.k.a. free product) `Monoid.CoprodI M`.
As usual, we use the suffix `I` for an indexed (co)product,
leaving `Coprod` for the coproduct of two monoids.
When `ι` and all `M i` have decidable equality,
the free product bijects with the type `Monoid.CoprodI.Word M` of reduced words.
This bijection is constructed
by defining an action of `Monoid.CoprodI M` on `Monoid.CoprodI.Word M`.
When `M i` are all groups, `Monoid.CoprodI M` is also a group
(and the coproduct in the category of groups).
## Main definitions
- `Monoid.CoprodI M`: the free product, defined as a quotient of a free monoid.
- `Monoid.CoprodI.of {i} : M i →* Monoid.CoprodI M`.
- `Monoid.CoprodI.lift : (∀ {i}, M i →* N) ≃ (Monoid.CoprodI M →* N)`: the universal property.
- `Monoid.CoprodI.Word M`: the type of reduced words.
- `Monoid.CoprodI.Word.equiv M : Monoid.CoprodI M ≃ word M`.
- `Monoid.CoprodI.NeWord M i j`: an inductive description of non-empty words
with first letter from `M i` and last letter from `M j`,
together with an API (`singleton`, `append`, `head`, `tail`, `to_word`, `Prod`, `inv`).
Used in the proof of the Ping-Pong-lemma.
- `Monoid.CoprodI.lift_injective_of_ping_pong`: The Ping-Pong-lemma,
proving injectivity of the `lift`. See the documentation of that theorem for more information.
## Remarks
There are many answers to the question "what is the coproduct of a family `M` of monoids?",
and they are all equivalent but not obviously equivalent.
We provide two answers.
The first, almost tautological answer is given by `Monoid.CoprodI M`,
which is a quotient of the type of words in the alphabet `Σ i, M i`.
It's straightforward to define and easy to prove its universal property.
But this answer is not completely satisfactory,
because it's difficult to tell when two elements `x y : Monoid.CoprodI M` are distinct
since `Monoid.CoprodI M` is defined as a quotient.
The second, maximally efficient answer is given by `Monoid.CoprodI.Word M`.
An element of `Monoid.CoprodI.Word M` is a word in the alphabet `Σ i, M i`,
where the letter `⟨i, 1⟩` doesn't occur and no adjacent letters share an index `i`.
Since we only work with reduced words, there is no need for quotienting,
and it is easy to tell when two elements are distinct.
However it's not obvious that this is even a monoid!
We prove that every element of `Monoid.CoprodI M` can be represented by a unique reduced word,
i.e. `Monoid.CoprodI M` and `Monoid.CoprodI.Word M` are equivalent types.
This means that `Monoid.CoprodI.Word M` can be given a monoid structure,
and it lets us tell when two elements of `Monoid.CoprodI M` are distinct.
There is also a completely tautological, maximally inefficient answer
given by `MonCat.Colimits.ColimitType`.
Whereas `Monoid.CoprodI M` at least ensures that
(any instance of) associativity holds by reflexivity,
in this answer associativity holds because of quotienting.
Yet another answer, which is constructively more satisfying,
could be obtained by showing that `Monoid.CoprodI.Rel` is confluent.
## References
[van der Waerden, *Free products of groups*][MR25465]
-/
open Set
variable {ι : Type*} (M : ι → Type*) [∀ i, Monoid (M i)]
/-- A relation on the free monoid on alphabet `Σ i, M i`,
relating `⟨i, 1⟩` with `1` and `⟨i, x⟩ * ⟨i, y⟩` with `⟨i, x * y⟩`. -/
inductive Monoid.CoprodI.Rel : FreeMonoid (Σ i, M i) → FreeMonoid (Σ i, M i) → Prop
| of_one (i : ι) : Monoid.CoprodI.Rel (FreeMonoid.of ⟨i, 1⟩) 1
| of_mul {i : ι} (x y : M i) :
Monoid.CoprodI.Rel (FreeMonoid.of ⟨i, x⟩ * FreeMonoid.of ⟨i, y⟩) (FreeMonoid.of ⟨i, x * y⟩)
/-- The free product (categorical coproduct) of an indexed family of monoids. -/
def Monoid.CoprodI : Type _ := (conGen (Monoid.CoprodI.Rel M)).Quotient
-- The `Monoid` instance should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
instance : Monoid (Monoid.CoprodI M) := by
delta Monoid.CoprodI; infer_instance
instance : Inhabited (Monoid.CoprodI M) :=
⟨1⟩
namespace Monoid.CoprodI
/-- The type of reduced words. A reduced word cannot contain a letter `1`, and no two adjacent
letters can come from the same summand. -/
@[ext]
structure Word where
/-- A `Word` is a `List (Σ i, M i)`, such that `1` is not in the list, and no
two adjacent letters are from the same summand -/
toList : List (Σi, M i)
/-- A reduced word does not contain `1` -/
ne_one : ∀ l ∈ toList, Sigma.snd l ≠ 1
/-- Adjacent letters are not from the same summand. -/
chain_ne : toList.Chain' fun l l' => Sigma.fst l ≠ Sigma.fst l'
variable {M}
/-- The inclusion of a summand into the free product. -/
def of {i : ι} : M i →* CoprodI M where
toFun x := Con.mk' _ (FreeMonoid.of <| Sigma.mk i x)
map_one' := (Con.eq _).mpr (ConGen.Rel.of _ _ (CoprodI.Rel.of_one i))
map_mul' x y := Eq.symm <| (Con.eq _).mpr (ConGen.Rel.of _ _ (CoprodI.Rel.of_mul x y))
theorem of_apply {i} (m : M i) : of m = Con.mk' _ (FreeMonoid.of <| Sigma.mk i m) :=
rfl
variable {N : Type*} [Monoid N]
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
-- Porting note: higher `ext` priority
@[ext 1100]
theorem ext_hom (f g : CoprodI M →* N) (h : ∀ i, f.comp (of : M i →* _) = g.comp of) : f = g :=
(MonoidHom.cancel_right Con.mk'_surjective).mp <|
FreeMonoid.hom_eq fun ⟨i, x⟩ => by
rw [MonoidHom.comp_apply, MonoidHom.comp_apply, ← of_apply]
unfold CoprodI
rw [← MonoidHom.comp_apply, ← MonoidHom.comp_apply, h]
| /-- A map out of the free product corresponds to a family of maps out of the summands. This is the
universal property of the free product, characterizing it as a categorical coproduct. -/
@[simps symm_apply]
def lift : (∀ i, M i →* N) ≃ (CoprodI M →* N) where
toFun fi :=
Con.lift _ (FreeMonoid.lift fun p : Σi, M i => fi p.fst p.snd) <|
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/CoprodI.lean | 141 | 146 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Dedup
import Mathlib.Data.List.Infix
/-!
# Preparations for defining operations on `Finset`.
The operations here ignore multiplicities,
and preparatory for defining the corresponding operations on `Finset`.
-/
-- Assert that we define `Finset` without the material on the set lattice.
-- Note that we cannot put this in `Data.Finset.Basic` because we proved relevant lemmas there.
assert_not_exists Set.sInter
namespace Multiset
open List
variable {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] {s : Multiset α}
/-! ### finset insert -/
/-- `ndinsert a s` is the lift of the list `insert` operation. This operation
does not respect multiplicities, unlike `cons`, but it is suitable as
an insert operation on `Finset`. -/
def ndinsert (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : Multiset α :=
Quot.liftOn s (fun l => (l.insert a : Multiset α)) fun _ _ p => Quot.sound (p.insert a)
@[simp]
theorem coe_ndinsert (a : α) (l : List α) : ndinsert a l = (insert a l : List α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ndinsert_zero (a : α) : ndinsert a 0 = {a} :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ndinsert_of_mem {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ s → ndinsert a s = s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _ h => congr_arg ((↑) : List α → Multiset α) <| insert_of_mem h
@[simp]
theorem ndinsert_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∉ s → ndinsert a s = a ::ₘ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _ h => congr_arg ((↑) : List α → Multiset α) <| insert_of_not_mem h
@[simp]
theorem mem_ndinsert {a b : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ ndinsert b s ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _ => mem_insert_iff
@[simp]
theorem le_ndinsert_self (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : s ≤ ndinsert a s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _ => (sublist_insert _ _).subperm
theorem mem_ndinsert_self (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : a ∈ ndinsert a s := by simp
theorem mem_ndinsert_of_mem {a b : α} {s : Multiset α} (h : a ∈ s) : a ∈ ndinsert b s :=
mem_ndinsert.2 (Or.inr h)
@[simp]
theorem length_ndinsert_of_mem {a : α} {s : Multiset α} (h : a ∈ s) :
card (ndinsert a s) = card s := by simp [h]
@[simp]
theorem length_ndinsert_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : Multiset α} (h : a ∉ s) :
card (ndinsert a s) = card s + 1 := by simp [h]
theorem dedup_cons {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : dedup (a ::ₘ s) = ndinsert a (dedup s) := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s <;> simp [h]
theorem Nodup.ndinsert (a : α) : Nodup s → Nodup (ndinsert a s) :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _ => Nodup.insert
theorem ndinsert_le {a : α} {s t : Multiset α} : ndinsert a s ≤ t ↔ s ≤ t ∧ a ∈ t :=
⟨fun h => ⟨le_trans (le_ndinsert_self _ _) h, mem_of_le h (mem_ndinsert_self _ _)⟩, fun ⟨l, m⟩ =>
if h : a ∈ s then by simp [h, l]
else by
| rw [ndinsert_of_not_mem h, ← cons_erase m, cons_le_cons_iff, ← le_cons_of_not_mem h,
cons_erase m]
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/FinsetOps.lean | 83 | 84 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Expand
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Splits
import Mathlib.Algebra.Squarefree.Basic
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.IntermediateField.Basic
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Minpoly.Field
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Content
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerBasis
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Lattice
/-!
# Separable polynomials
We define a polynomial to be separable if it is coprime with its derivative. We prove basic
properties about separable polynomials here.
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.Separable f`: a polynomial `f` is separable iff it is coprime with its derivative.
* `IsSeparable K x`: an element `x` is separable over `K` iff the minimal polynomial of `x`
over `K` is separable.
* `Algebra.IsSeparable K L`: `L` is separable over `K` iff every element in `L` is separable
over `K`.
-/
universe u v w
open Polynomial Finset
namespace Polynomial
section CommSemiring
variable {R : Type u} [CommSemiring R] {S : Type v} [CommSemiring S]
/-- A polynomial is separable iff it is coprime with its derivative. -/
@[stacks 09H1 "first part"]
def Separable (f : R[X]) : Prop :=
IsCoprime f (derivative f)
theorem separable_def (f : R[X]) : f.Separable ↔ IsCoprime f (derivative f) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem separable_def' (f : R[X]) : f.Separable ↔ ∃ a b : R[X], a * f + b * (derivative f) = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
theorem not_separable_zero [Nontrivial R] : ¬Separable (0 : R[X]) := by
rintro ⟨x, y, h⟩
simp only [derivative_zero, mul_zero, add_zero, zero_ne_one] at h
theorem Separable.ne_zero [Nontrivial R] {f : R[X]} (h : f.Separable) : f ≠ 0 :=
(not_separable_zero <| · ▸ h)
@[simp]
theorem separable_one : (1 : R[X]).Separable :=
isCoprime_one_left
@[nontriviality]
theorem separable_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton R] (f : R[X]) : f.Separable := by
simp [Separable, IsCoprime, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
theorem separable_X_add_C (a : R) : (X + C a).Separable := by
rw [separable_def, derivative_add, derivative_X, derivative_C, add_zero]
exact isCoprime_one_right
theorem separable_X : (X : R[X]).Separable := by
rw [separable_def, derivative_X]
exact isCoprime_one_right
theorem separable_C (r : R) : (C r).Separable ↔ IsUnit r := by
rw [separable_def, derivative_C, isCoprime_zero_right, isUnit_C]
theorem Separable.of_mul_left {f g : R[X]} (h : (f * g).Separable) : f.Separable := by
have := h.of_mul_left_left; rw [derivative_mul] at this
exact IsCoprime.of_mul_right_left (IsCoprime.of_add_mul_left_right this)
theorem Separable.of_mul_right {f g : R[X]} (h : (f * g).Separable) : g.Separable := by
rw [mul_comm] at h
exact h.of_mul_left
theorem Separable.of_dvd {f g : R[X]} (hf : f.Separable) (hfg : g ∣ f) : g.Separable := by
rcases hfg with ⟨f', rfl⟩
exact Separable.of_mul_left hf
theorem separable_gcd_left {F : Type*} [Field F] [DecidableEq F[X]]
{f : F[X]} (hf : f.Separable) (g : F[X]) :
(EuclideanDomain.gcd f g).Separable :=
Separable.of_dvd hf (EuclideanDomain.gcd_dvd_left f g)
theorem separable_gcd_right {F : Type*} [Field F] [DecidableEq F[X]]
{g : F[X]} (f : F[X]) (hg : g.Separable) :
(EuclideanDomain.gcd f g).Separable :=
Separable.of_dvd hg (EuclideanDomain.gcd_dvd_right f g)
theorem Separable.isCoprime {f g : R[X]} (h : (f * g).Separable) : IsCoprime f g := by
have := h.of_mul_left_left; rw [derivative_mul] at this
exact IsCoprime.of_mul_right_right (IsCoprime.of_add_mul_left_right this)
theorem Separable.of_pow' {f : R[X]} :
∀ {n : ℕ} (_h : (f ^ n).Separable), IsUnit f ∨ f.Separable ∧ n = 1 ∨ n = 0
| 0 => fun _h => Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl
| 1 => fun h => Or.inr <| Or.inl ⟨pow_one f ▸ h, rfl⟩
| n + 2 => fun h => by
rw [pow_succ, pow_succ] at h
exact Or.inl (isCoprime_self.1 h.isCoprime.of_mul_left_right)
theorem Separable.of_pow {f : R[X]} (hf : ¬IsUnit f) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0)
(hfs : (f ^ n).Separable) : f.Separable ∧ n = 1 :=
(hfs.of_pow'.resolve_left hf).resolve_right hn
theorem Separable.map {p : R[X]} (h : p.Separable) {f : R →+* S} : (p.map f).Separable :=
let ⟨a, b, H⟩ := h
⟨a.map f, b.map f, by
rw [derivative_map, ← Polynomial.map_mul, ← Polynomial.map_mul, ← Polynomial.map_add, H,
Polynomial.map_one]⟩
theorem _root_.Associated.separable {f g : R[X]}
(ha : Associated f g) (h : f.Separable) : g.Separable := by
obtain ⟨⟨u, v, h1, h2⟩, ha⟩ := ha
obtain ⟨a, b, h⟩ := h
refine ⟨a * v + b * derivative v, b * v, ?_⟩
replace h := congr($h * $(h1))
have h3 := congr(derivative $(h1))
simp only [← ha, derivative_mul, derivative_one] at h3 ⊢
calc
_ = (a * f + b * derivative f) * (u * v)
+ (b * f) * (derivative u * v + u * derivative v) := by ring1
_ = 1 := by rw [h, h3]; ring1
theorem _root_.Associated.separable_iff {f g : R[X]}
(ha : Associated f g) : f.Separable ↔ g.Separable := ⟨ha.separable, ha.symm.separable⟩
theorem Separable.mul_unit {f g : R[X]} (hf : f.Separable) (hg : IsUnit g) : (f * g).Separable :=
(associated_mul_unit_right f g hg).separable hf
theorem Separable.unit_mul {f g : R[X]} (hf : IsUnit f) (hg : g.Separable) : (f * g).Separable :=
(associated_unit_mul_right g f hf).separable hg
theorem Separable.eval₂_derivative_ne_zero [Nontrivial S] (f : R →+* S) {p : R[X]}
(h : p.Separable) {x : S} (hx : p.eval₂ f x = 0) :
(derivative p).eval₂ f x ≠ 0 := by
intro hx'
obtain ⟨a, b, e⟩ := h
apply_fun Polynomial.eval₂ f x at e
simp only [eval₂_add, eval₂_mul, hx, mul_zero, hx', add_zero, eval₂_one, zero_ne_one] at e
theorem Separable.aeval_derivative_ne_zero [Nontrivial S] [Algebra R S] {p : R[X]}
(h : p.Separable) {x : S} (hx : aeval x p = 0) :
aeval x (derivative p) ≠ 0 :=
h.eval₂_derivative_ne_zero (algebraMap R S) hx
variable (p q : ℕ)
theorem isUnit_of_self_mul_dvd_separable {p q : R[X]} (hp : p.Separable) (hq : q * q ∣ p) :
IsUnit q := by
obtain ⟨p, rfl⟩ := hq
apply isCoprime_self.mp
have : IsCoprime (q * (q * p))
(q * (derivative q * p + derivative q * p + q * derivative p)) := by
simp only [← mul_assoc, mul_add]
dsimp only [Separable] at hp
convert hp using 1
rw [derivative_mul, derivative_mul]
ring
exact IsCoprime.of_mul_right_left (IsCoprime.of_mul_left_left this)
theorem emultiplicity_le_one_of_separable {p q : R[X]} (hq : ¬IsUnit q) (hsep : Separable p) :
emultiplicity q p ≤ 1 := by
contrapose! hq
apply isUnit_of_self_mul_dvd_separable hsep
rw [← sq]
apply pow_dvd_of_le_emultiplicity
exact Order.add_one_le_of_lt hq
/-- A separable polynomial is square-free.
See `PerfectField.separable_iff_squarefree` for the converse when the coefficients are a perfect
field. -/
theorem Separable.squarefree {p : R[X]} (hsep : Separable p) : Squarefree p := by
classical
rw [squarefree_iff_emultiplicity_le_one p]
exact fun f => or_iff_not_imp_right.mpr fun hunit => emultiplicity_le_one_of_separable hunit hsep
end CommSemiring
section CommRing
variable {R : Type u} [CommRing R]
theorem separable_X_sub_C {x : R} : Separable (X - C x) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg, C_neg] using separable_X_add_C (-x)
theorem Separable.mul {f g : R[X]} (hf : f.Separable) (hg : g.Separable) (h : IsCoprime f g) :
(f * g).Separable := by
rw [separable_def, derivative_mul]
exact
((hf.mul_right h).add_mul_left_right _).mul_left ((h.symm.mul_right hg).mul_add_right_right _)
theorem separable_prod' {ι : Sort _} {f : ι → R[X]} {s : Finset ι} :
(∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → IsCoprime (f x) (f y)) →
(∀ x ∈ s, (f x).Separable) → (∏ x ∈ s, f x).Separable := by
classical
exact Finset.induction_on s (fun _ _ => separable_one) fun a s has ih h1 h2 => by
simp_rw [Finset.forall_mem_insert, forall_and] at h1 h2; rw [prod_insert has]
exact
h2.1.mul (ih h1.2.2 h2.2)
(IsCoprime.prod_right fun i his => h1.1.2 i his <| Ne.symm <| ne_of_mem_of_not_mem his has)
open scoped Function in -- required for scoped `on` notation
theorem separable_prod {ι : Sort _} [Fintype ι] {f : ι → R[X]} (h1 : Pairwise (IsCoprime on f))
(h2 : ∀ x, (f x).Separable) : (∏ x, f x).Separable :=
separable_prod' (fun _x _hx _y _hy hxy => h1 hxy) fun x _hx => h2 x
theorem Separable.inj_of_prod_X_sub_C [Nontrivial R] {ι : Sort _} {f : ι → R} {s : Finset ι}
(hfs : (∏ i ∈ s, (X - C (f i))).Separable) {x y : ι} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(hfxy : f x = f y) : x = y := by
classical
by_contra hxy
rw [← insert_erase hx, prod_insert (not_mem_erase _ _), ←
insert_erase (mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem (Ne.symm hxy) hy), prod_insert (not_mem_erase _ _), ←
mul_assoc, hfxy, ← sq] at hfs
cases (hfs.of_mul_left.of_pow (not_isUnit_X_sub_C _) two_ne_zero).2
theorem Separable.injective_of_prod_X_sub_C [Nontrivial R] {ι : Sort _} [Fintype ι] {f : ι → R}
(hfs : (∏ i, (X - C (f i))).Separable) : Function.Injective f := fun _x _y hfxy =>
hfs.inj_of_prod_X_sub_C (mem_univ _) (mem_univ _) hfxy
theorem nodup_of_separable_prod [Nontrivial R] {s : Multiset R}
(hs : Separable (Multiset.map (fun a => X - C a) s).prod) : s.Nodup := by
rw [Multiset.nodup_iff_ne_cons_cons]
rintro a t rfl
refine not_isUnit_X_sub_C a (isUnit_of_self_mul_dvd_separable hs ?_)
simpa only [Multiset.map_cons, Multiset.prod_cons] using mul_dvd_mul_left _ (dvd_mul_right _ _)
/-- If `IsUnit n` in a `CommRing R`, then `X ^ n - u` is separable for any unit `u`. -/
theorem separable_X_pow_sub_C_unit {n : ℕ} (u : Rˣ) (hn : IsUnit (n : R)) :
Separable (X ^ n - C (u : R)) := by
nontriviality R
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hpos)
· simp at hn
apply (separable_def' (X ^ n - C (u : R))).2
obtain ⟨n', hn'⟩ := hn.exists_left_inv
refine ⟨-C ↑u⁻¹, C (↑u⁻¹ : R) * C n' * X, ?_⟩
rw [derivative_sub, derivative_C, sub_zero, derivative_pow X n, derivative_X, mul_one]
calc
-C ↑u⁻¹ * (X ^ n - C ↑u) + C ↑u⁻¹ * C n' * X * (↑n * X ^ (n - 1)) =
C (↑u⁻¹ * ↑u) - C ↑u⁻¹ * X ^ n + C ↑u⁻¹ * C (n' * ↑n) * (X * X ^ (n - 1)) := by
simp only [C.map_mul, C_eq_natCast]
ring
_ = 1 := by
simp only [Units.inv_mul, hn', C.map_one, mul_one, ← pow_succ',
Nat.sub_add_cancel (show 1 ≤ n from hpos), sub_add_cancel]
/-- If `n = 0` in `R` and `b` is a unit, then `a * X ^ n + b * X + c` is separable. -/
theorem separable_C_mul_X_pow_add_C_mul_X_add_C
{n : ℕ} (a b c : R) (hn : (n : R) = 0) (hb : IsUnit b) :
(C a * X ^ n + C b * X + C c).Separable := by
set f := C a * X ^ n + C b * X + C c
obtain ⟨e, hb⟩ := hb.exists_left_inv
refine ⟨-derivative f, f + C e, ?_⟩
have hderiv : derivative f = C b := by
simp [hn, f, map_add derivative, derivative_C, derivative_X_pow]
rw [hderiv, right_distrib, ← add_assoc, neg_mul, mul_comm, neg_add_cancel, zero_add,
← map_mul, hb, map_one]
/-- If `R` is of characteristic `p`, `p ∣ n` and `b` is a unit,
then `a * X ^ n + b * X + c` is separable. -/
theorem separable_C_mul_X_pow_add_C_mul_X_add_C'
(p n : ℕ) (a b c : R) [CharP R p] (hn : p ∣ n) (hb : IsUnit b) :
(C a * X ^ n + C b * X + C c).Separable :=
separable_C_mul_X_pow_add_C_mul_X_add_C a b c ((CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff R p n).2 hn) hb
theorem rootMultiplicity_le_one_of_separable [Nontrivial R] {p : R[X]} (hsep : Separable p)
(x : R) : rootMultiplicity x p ≤ 1 := by
classical
by_cases hp : p = 0
· simp [hp]
rw [rootMultiplicity_eq_multiplicity, if_neg hp, ← Nat.cast_le (α := ℕ∞),
Nat.cast_one, ← (finiteMultiplicity_X_sub_C x hp).emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity]
apply emultiplicity_le_one_of_separable (not_isUnit_X_sub_C _) hsep
end CommRing
section IsDomain
variable {R : Type u} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
theorem count_roots_le_one [DecidableEq R] {p : R[X]} (hsep : Separable p) (x : R) :
p.roots.count x ≤ 1 := by
rw [count_roots p]
exact rootMultiplicity_le_one_of_separable hsep x
theorem nodup_roots {p : R[X]} (hsep : Separable p) : p.roots.Nodup := by
classical
exact Multiset.nodup_iff_count_le_one.mpr (count_roots_le_one hsep)
end IsDomain
section Field
variable {F : Type u} [Field F] {K : Type v} [Field K]
theorem separable_iff_derivative_ne_zero {f : F[X]} (hf : Irreducible f) :
f.Separable ↔ derivative f ≠ 0 :=
⟨fun h1 h2 => hf.not_isUnit <| isCoprime_zero_right.1 <| h2 ▸ h1, fun h =>
EuclideanDomain.isCoprime_of_dvd (mt And.right h) fun g hg1 _hg2 ⟨p, hg3⟩ hg4 =>
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := (hf.isUnit_or_isUnit hg3).resolve_left hg1
have : f ∣ derivative f := by
conv_lhs => rw [hg3, ← hu]
rwa [Units.mul_right_dvd]
not_lt_of_le (natDegree_le_of_dvd this h) <|
natDegree_derivative_lt <| mt derivative_of_natDegree_zero h⟩
attribute [local instance] Ideal.Quotient.field in
theorem separable_map {S} [CommRing S] [Nontrivial S] (f : F →+* S) {p : F[X]} :
(p.map f).Separable ↔ p.Separable := by
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, fun H ↦ H.map⟩
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := Ideal.exists_maximal S
have := Separable.map H (f := Ideal.Quotient.mk m)
rwa [map_map, separable_def, derivative_map, isCoprime_map] at this
theorem separable_prod_X_sub_C_iff' {ι : Sort _} {f : ι → F} {s : Finset ι} :
(∏ i ∈ s, (X - C (f i))).Separable ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, f x = f y → x = y :=
⟨fun hfs _ hx _ hy hfxy => hfs.inj_of_prod_X_sub_C hx hy hfxy, fun H => by
rw [← prod_attach]
exact
separable_prod'
(fun x _hx y _hy hxy =>
@pairwise_coprime_X_sub_C _ _ { x // x ∈ s } (fun x => f x)
(fun x y hxy => Subtype.eq <| H x.1 x.2 y.1 y.2 hxy) _ _ hxy)
fun _ _ => separable_X_sub_C⟩
theorem separable_prod_X_sub_C_iff {ι : Sort _} [Fintype ι] {f : ι → F} :
(∏ i, (X - C (f i))).Separable ↔ Function.Injective f :=
separable_prod_X_sub_C_iff'.trans <| by simp_rw [mem_univ, true_imp_iff, Function.Injective]
section CharP
variable (p : ℕ) [HF : CharP F p]
theorem separable_or {f : F[X]} (hf : Irreducible f) :
f.Separable ∨ ¬f.Separable ∧ ∃ g : F[X], Irreducible g ∧ expand F p g = f := by
classical
exact if H : derivative f = 0 then by
rcases p.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hp)
· haveI := CharP.charP_to_charZero F
have := natDegree_eq_zero_of_derivative_eq_zero H
have := (natDegree_pos_iff_degree_pos.mpr <| degree_pos_of_irreducible hf).ne'
contradiction
haveI := isLocalHom_expand F hp
exact
Or.inr
⟨by rw [separable_iff_derivative_ne_zero hf, Classical.not_not, H], contract p f,
Irreducible.of_map (by rwa [← expand_contract p H hp.ne'] at hf),
expand_contract p H hp.ne'⟩
else Or.inl <| (separable_iff_derivative_ne_zero hf).2 H
theorem exists_separable_of_irreducible {f : F[X]} (hf : Irreducible f) (hp : p ≠ 0) :
∃ (n : ℕ) (g : F[X]), g.Separable ∧ expand F (p ^ n) g = f := by
replace hp : p.Prime := (CharP.char_is_prime_or_zero F p).resolve_right hp
induction' hn : f.natDegree using Nat.strong_induction_on with N ih generalizing f
rcases separable_or p hf with (h | ⟨h1, g, hg, hgf⟩)
· refine ⟨0, f, h, ?_⟩
rw [pow_zero, expand_one]
· rcases N with - | N
· rw [natDegree_eq_zero_iff_degree_le_zero, degree_le_zero_iff] at hn
rw [hn, separable_C, isUnit_iff_ne_zero, Classical.not_not] at h1
have hf0 : f ≠ 0 := hf.ne_zero
rw [h1, C_0] at hn
exact absurd hn hf0
have hg1 : g.natDegree * p = N.succ := by rwa [← natDegree_expand, hgf]
have hg2 : g.natDegree ≠ 0 := by
| intro this
rw [this, zero_mul] at hg1
cases hg1
have hg3 : g.natDegree < N.succ := by
rw [← mul_one g.natDegree, ← hg1]
exact Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left hp.one_lt hg2.bot_lt
rcases ih _ hg3 hg rfl with ⟨n, g, hg4, rfl⟩
refine ⟨n + 1, g, hg4, ?_⟩
rw [← hgf, expand_expand, pow_succ']
theorem isUnit_or_eq_zero_of_separable_expand {f : F[X]} (n : ℕ) (hp : 0 < p)
(hf : (expand F (p ^ n) f).Separable) : IsUnit f ∨ n = 0 := by
rw [or_iff_not_imp_right]
rintro hn : n ≠ 0
have hf2 : derivative (expand F (p ^ n) f) = 0 := by
rw [derivative_expand, Nat.cast_pow, CharP.cast_eq_zero, zero_pow hn, zero_mul, mul_zero]
rw [separable_def, hf2, isCoprime_zero_right, isUnit_iff] at hf
rcases hf with ⟨r, hr, hrf⟩
rw [eq_comm, expand_eq_C (pow_pos hp _)] at hrf
rwa [hrf, isUnit_C]
theorem unique_separable_of_irreducible {f : F[X]} (hf : Irreducible f) (hp : 0 < p) (n₁ : ℕ)
(g₁ : F[X]) (hg₁ : g₁.Separable) (hgf₁ : expand F (p ^ n₁) g₁ = f) (n₂ : ℕ) (g₂ : F[X])
(hg₂ : g₂.Separable) (hgf₂ : expand F (p ^ n₂) g₂ = f) : n₁ = n₂ ∧ g₁ = g₂ := by
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/Separable.lean | 380 | 403 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jujian Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jujian Zhang, Kim Morrison, Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Additive
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Abelian.Injective.Resolution
/-!
# Right-derived functors
We define the right-derived functors `F.rightDerived n : C ⥤ D` for any additive functor `F`
out of a category with injective resolutions.
We first define a functor
`F.rightDerivedToHomotopyCategory : C ⥤ HomotopyCategory D (ComplexShape.up ℕ)` which is
`injectiveResolutions C ⋙ F.mapHomotopyCategory _`. We show that if `X : C` and
`I : InjectiveResolution X`, then `F.rightDerivedToHomotopyCategory.obj X` identifies
to the image in the homotopy category of the functor `F` applied objectwise to `I.cocomplex`
(this isomorphism is `I.isoRightDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj F`).
Then, the right-derived functors `F.rightDerived n : C ⥤ D` are obtained by composing
`F.rightDerivedToHomotopyCategory` with the homology functors on the homotopy category.
Similarly we define natural transformations between right-derived functors coming from
natural transformations between the original additive functors,
and show how to compute the components.
## Main results
* `Functor.isZero_rightDerived_obj_injective_succ`: injective objects have no higher
right derived functor.
* `NatTrans.rightDerived`: the natural isomorphism between right derived functors
induced by natural transformation.
* `Functor.toRightDerivedZero`: the natural transformation `F ⟶ F.rightDerived 0`,
which is an isomorphism when `F` is left exact (i.e. preserves finite limits),
see also `Functor.rightDerivedZeroIsoSelf`.
## TODO
* refactor `Functor.rightDerived` (and `Functor.leftDerived`) when the necessary
material enters mathlib: derived categories, injective/projective derivability
structures, existence of derived functors from derivability structures.
Eventually, we shall get a right derived functor
`F.rightDerivedFunctorPlus : DerivedCategory.Plus C ⥤ DerivedCategory.Plus D`,
and `F.rightDerived` shall be redefined using `F.rightDerivedFunctorPlus`.
-/
universe v u
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] {D : Type*} [Category D]
[Abelian C] [HasInjectiveResolutions C] [Abelian D]
/-- When `F : C ⥤ D` is an additive functor, this is
the functor `C ⥤ HomotopyCategory D (ComplexShape.up ℕ)` which
sends `X : C` to `F` applied to an injective resolution of `X`. -/
noncomputable def Functor.rightDerivedToHomotopyCategory (F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] :
C ⥤ HomotopyCategory D (ComplexShape.up ℕ) :=
injectiveResolutions C ⋙ F.mapHomotopyCategory _
/-- If `I : InjectiveResolution Z` and `F : C ⥤ D` is an additive functor, this is
an isomorphism between `F.rightDerivedToHomotopyCategory.obj X` and the complex
obtained by applying `F` to `I.cocomplex`. -/
noncomputable def InjectiveResolution.isoRightDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj {X : C}
(I : InjectiveResolution X) (F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] :
F.rightDerivedToHomotopyCategory.obj X ≅
(F.mapHomologicalComplex _ ⋙ HomotopyCategory.quotient _ _).obj I.cocomplex :=
(F.mapHomotopyCategory _).mapIso I.iso ≪≫
(F.mapHomotopyCategoryFactors _).app I.cocomplex
@[reassoc]
lemma InjectiveResolution.isoRightDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj_hom_naturality
{X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (I : InjectiveResolution X) (J : InjectiveResolution Y)
(φ : I.cocomplex ⟶ J.cocomplex) (comm : I.ι.f 0 ≫ φ.f 0 = f ≫ J.ι.f 0)
(F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] :
F.rightDerivedToHomotopyCategory.map f ≫ (J.isoRightDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj F).hom =
(I.isoRightDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj F).hom ≫
(F.mapHomologicalComplex _ ⋙ HomotopyCategory.quotient _ _).map φ := by
dsimp [Functor.rightDerivedToHomotopyCategory, isoRightDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj]
rw [← Functor.map_comp_assoc, iso_hom_naturality f I J φ comm, Functor.map_comp,
assoc, assoc]
erw [(F.mapHomotopyCategoryFactors (ComplexShape.up ℕ)).hom.naturality]
rfl
@[reassoc]
lemma InjectiveResolution.isoRightDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj_inv_naturality
{X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (I : InjectiveResolution X) (J : InjectiveResolution Y)
(φ : I.cocomplex ⟶ J.cocomplex) (comm : I.ι.f 0 ≫ φ.f 0 = f ≫ J.ι.f 0)
(F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] :
(I.isoRightDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj F).inv ≫ F.rightDerivedToHomotopyCategory.map f =
(F.mapHomologicalComplex _ ⋙ HomotopyCategory.quotient _ _).map φ ≫
(J.isoRightDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj F).inv := by
rw [← cancel_epi (I.isoRightDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj F).hom, Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc]
dsimp
rw [← isoRightDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj_hom_naturality_assoc f I J φ comm F,
Iso.hom_inv_id, comp_id]
/-- The right derived functors of an additive functor. -/
noncomputable def Functor.rightDerived (F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] (n : ℕ) : C ⥤ D :=
F.rightDerivedToHomotopyCategory ⋙ HomotopyCategory.homologyFunctor D _ n
/-- We can compute a right derived functor using a chosen injective resolution. -/
noncomputable def InjectiveResolution.isoRightDerivedObj {X : C} (I : InjectiveResolution X)
(F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] (n : ℕ) :
(F.rightDerived n).obj X ≅
(HomologicalComplex.homologyFunctor D _ n).obj
((F.mapHomologicalComplex _).obj I.cocomplex) :=
(HomotopyCategory.homologyFunctor D _ n).mapIso
(I.isoRightDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj F) ≪≫
(HomotopyCategory.homologyFunctorFactors D (ComplexShape.up ℕ) n).app _
@[reassoc]
lemma InjectiveResolution.isoRightDerivedObj_hom_naturality
{X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (I : InjectiveResolution X) (J : InjectiveResolution Y)
(φ : I.cocomplex ⟶ J.cocomplex) (comm : I.ι.f 0 ≫ φ.f 0 = f ≫ J.ι.f 0)
(F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] (n : ℕ) :
(F.rightDerived n).map f ≫ (J.isoRightDerivedObj F n).hom =
(I.isoRightDerivedObj F n).hom ≫
(F.mapHomologicalComplex _ ⋙ HomologicalComplex.homologyFunctor _ _ n).map φ := by
dsimp [isoRightDerivedObj, Functor.rightDerived]
rw [assoc, ← Functor.map_comp_assoc,
InjectiveResolution.isoRightDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj_hom_naturality f I J φ comm F,
Functor.map_comp, assoc]
erw [(HomotopyCategory.homologyFunctorFactors D (ComplexShape.up ℕ) n).hom.naturality]
rfl
@[reassoc]
lemma InjectiveResolution.isoRightDerivedObj_inv_naturality
{X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (I : InjectiveResolution X) (J : InjectiveResolution Y)
(φ : I.cocomplex ⟶ J.cocomplex) (comm : I.ι.f 0 ≫ φ.f 0 = f ≫ J.ι.f 0)
(F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] (n : ℕ) :
(I.isoRightDerivedObj F n).inv ≫ (F.rightDerived n).map f =
(F.mapHomologicalComplex _ ⋙ HomologicalComplex.homologyFunctor _ _ n).map φ ≫
(J.isoRightDerivedObj F n).inv := by
rw [← cancel_mono (J.isoRightDerivedObj F n).hom, assoc, assoc,
InjectiveResolution.isoRightDerivedObj_hom_naturality f I J φ comm F n,
Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id, comp_id]
/-- The higher derived functors vanish on injective objects. -/
lemma Functor.isZero_rightDerived_obj_injective_succ
(F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] (n : ℕ) (X : C) [Injective X] :
IsZero ((F.rightDerived (n+1)).obj X) := by
refine IsZero.of_iso ?_ ((InjectiveResolution.self X).isoRightDerivedObj F (n + 1))
erw [← HomologicalComplex.exactAt_iff_isZero_homology]
exact ShortComplex.exact_of_isZero_X₂ _ (F.map_isZero (by apply isZero_zero))
/-- We can compute a right derived functor on a morphism using a descent of that morphism
to a cochain map between chosen injective resolutions.
-/
theorem Functor.rightDerived_map_eq (F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] (n : ℕ) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y)
{P : InjectiveResolution X} {Q : InjectiveResolution Y} (g : P.cocomplex ⟶ Q.cocomplex)
(w : P.ι ≫ g = (CochainComplex.single₀ C).map f ≫ Q.ι) :
(F.rightDerived n).map f =
(P.isoRightDerivedObj F n).hom ≫
(F.mapHomologicalComplex _ ⋙ HomologicalComplex.homologyFunctor _ _ n).map g ≫
(Q.isoRightDerivedObj F n).inv := by
rw [← cancel_mono (Q.isoRightDerivedObj F n).hom,
InjectiveResolution.isoRightDerivedObj_hom_naturality f P Q g _ F n,
assoc, assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id, comp_id]
rw [← HomologicalComplex.comp_f, w, HomologicalComplex.comp_f,
CochainComplex.single₀_map_f_zero]
/-- The natural transformation
`F.rightDerivedToHomotopyCategory ⟶ G.rightDerivedToHomotopyCategory` induced by
a natural transformation `F ⟶ G` between additive functors. -/
noncomputable def NatTrans.rightDerivedToHomotopyCategory
{F G : C ⥤ D} [F.Additive] [G.Additive] (α : F ⟶ G) :
F.rightDerivedToHomotopyCategory ⟶ G.rightDerivedToHomotopyCategory :=
whiskerLeft _ (NatTrans.mapHomotopyCategory α (ComplexShape.up ℕ))
lemma InjectiveResolution.rightDerivedToHomotopyCategory_app_eq
{F G : C ⥤ D} [F.Additive] [G.Additive] (α : F ⟶ G) {X : C} (P : InjectiveResolution X) :
(NatTrans.rightDerivedToHomotopyCategory α).app X =
(P.isoRightDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj F).hom ≫
(HomotopyCategory.quotient _ _).map
| ((NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex α _).app P.cocomplex) ≫
(P.isoRightDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj G).inv := by
rw [← cancel_mono (P.isoRightDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj G).hom, assoc, assoc,
Iso.inv_hom_id, comp_id]
dsimp [isoRightDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj, Functor.mapHomotopyCategoryFactors,
NatTrans.rightDerivedToHomotopyCategory]
rw [assoc]
erw [id_comp, comp_id]
obtain ⟨β, hβ⟩ := (HomotopyCategory.quotient _ _).map_surjective (iso P).hom
rw [← hβ]
dsimp
simp only [← Functor.map_comp, NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex_naturality]
rfl
@[simp]
lemma NatTrans.rightDerivedToHomotopyCategory_id (F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] :
NatTrans.rightDerivedToHomotopyCategory (𝟙 F) = 𝟙 _ := rfl
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Abelian/RightDerived.lean | 180 | 197 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Equiv
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Span.Basic
/-!
# Towers of algebras
In this file we prove basic facts about towers of algebra.
An algebra tower A/S/R is expressed by having instances of `Algebra A S`,
`Algebra R S`, `Algebra R A` and `IsScalarTower R S A`, the later asserting the
compatibility condition `(r • s) • a = r • (s • a)`.
An important definition is `toAlgHom R S A`, the canonical `R`-algebra homomorphism `S →ₐ[R] A`.
-/
open Pointwise
universe u v w u₁ v₁
variable (R : Type u) (S : Type v) (A : Type w) (B : Type u₁) (M : Type v₁)
namespace Algebra
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Semiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [Module A M] [Module B M]
variable [IsScalarTower R A M] [IsScalarTower R B M] [SMulCommClass A B M]
variable {A}
/-- The `R`-algebra morphism `A → End (M)` corresponding to the representation of the algebra `A`
on the `B`-module `M`.
This is a stronger version of `DistribMulAction.toLinearMap`, and could also have been
called `Algebra.toModuleEnd`.
The typeclasses correspond to the situation where the types act on each other as
```
R ----→ B
| ⟍ |
| ⟍ |
↓ ↘ ↓
A ----→ M
```
where the diagram commutes, the action by `R` commutes with everything, and the action by `A` and
`B` on `M` commute.
Typically this is most useful with `B = R` as `Algebra.lsmul R R A : A →ₐ[R] Module.End R M`.
However this can be used to get the fact that left-multiplication by `A` is right `A`-linear, and
vice versa, as
```lean
example : A →ₐ[R] Module.End Aᵐᵒᵖ A := Algebra.lsmul R Aᵐᵒᵖ A
example : Aᵐᵒᵖ →ₐ[R] Module.End A A := Algebra.lsmul R A A
```
respectively; though `LinearMap.mulLeft` and `LinearMap.mulRight` can also be used here.
-/
def lsmul : A →ₐ[R] Module.End B M where
toFun := DistribMulAction.toLinearMap B M
map_one' := LinearMap.ext fun _ => one_smul A _
map_mul' a b := LinearMap.ext <| smul_assoc a b
map_zero' := LinearMap.ext fun _ => zero_smul A _
map_add' _a _b := LinearMap.ext fun _ => add_smul _ _ _
commutes' r := LinearMap.ext <| algebraMap_smul A r
@[simp]
theorem lsmul_coe (a : A) : (lsmul R B M a : M → M) = (a • ·) := rfl
end Algebra
namespace IsScalarTower
section Module
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
variable [MulAction A M]
variable {R} {M}
theorem algebraMap_smul [SMul R M] [IsScalarTower R A M] (r : R) (x : M) :
algebraMap R A r • x = r • x := by
rw [Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one, smul_assoc, one_smul]
variable {A} in
theorem of_algebraMap_smul [SMul R M] (h : ∀ (r : R) (x : M), algebraMap R A r • x = r • x) :
IsScalarTower R A M where
smul_assoc r a x := by rw [Algebra.smul_def, mul_smul, h]
variable (R M) in
theorem of_compHom : letI := MulAction.compHom M (algebraMap R A : R →* A); IsScalarTower R A M :=
letI := MulAction.compHom M (algebraMap R A : R →* A); of_algebraMap_smul fun _ _ ↦ rfl
end Module
section Semiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Semiring A] [Semiring B]
variable [Algebra R S] [Algebra S A] [Algebra S B]
variable {R S A}
theorem of_algebraMap_eq [Algebra R A]
(h : ∀ x, algebraMap R A x = algebraMap S A (algebraMap R S x)) : IsScalarTower R S A :=
⟨fun x y z => by simp_rw [Algebra.smul_def, RingHom.map_mul, mul_assoc, h]⟩
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
theorem of_algebraMap_eq' [Algebra R A]
(h : algebraMap R A = (algebraMap S A).comp (algebraMap R S)) : IsScalarTower R S A :=
of_algebraMap_eq <| RingHom.ext_iff.1 h
variable (R S A)
variable [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
variable [IsScalarTower R S A] [IsScalarTower R S B]
theorem algebraMap_eq : algebraMap R A = (algebraMap S A).comp (algebraMap R S) :=
RingHom.ext fun x => by
simp_rw [RingHom.comp_apply, Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one, smul_assoc, one_smul]
theorem algebraMap_apply (x : R) : algebraMap R A x = algebraMap S A (algebraMap R S x) := by
rw [algebraMap_eq R S A, RingHom.comp_apply]
@[ext]
theorem Algebra.ext {S : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommSemiring S] [Semiring A] (h1 h2 : Algebra S A)
(h : ∀ (r : S) (x : A), (by have I := h1; exact r • x) = r • x) : h1 = h2 :=
Algebra.algebra_ext _ _ fun r => by
simpa only [@Algebra.smul_def _ _ _ _ h1, @Algebra.smul_def _ _ _ _ h2, mul_one] using h r 1
/-- In a tower, the canonical map from the middle element to the top element is an
algebra homomorphism over the bottom element. -/
def toAlgHom : S →ₐ[R] A :=
{ algebraMap S A with commutes' := fun _ => (algebraMap_apply _ _ _ _).symm }
theorem toAlgHom_apply (y : S) : toAlgHom R S A y = algebraMap S A y := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toAlgHom : ↑(toAlgHom R S A) = algebraMap S A :=
RingHom.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toAlgHom' : (toAlgHom R S A : S → A) = algebraMap S A := rfl
variable {R S A B}
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AlgHom.map_algebraMap (f : A →ₐ[S] B) (r : R) :
f (algebraMap R A r) = algebraMap R B r := by
rw [algebraMap_apply R S A r, f.commutes, ← algebraMap_apply R S B]
variable (R)
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AlgHom.comp_algebraMap_of_tower (f : A →ₐ[S] B) :
(f : A →+* B).comp (algebraMap R A) = algebraMap R B :=
RingHom.ext (AlgHom.map_algebraMap f)
-- conflicts with IsScalarTower.Subalgebra
instance (priority := 999) subsemiring (U : Subsemiring S) : IsScalarTower U S A :=
of_algebraMap_eq fun _x => rfl
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12096): removed @[nolint instance_priority], linter not ported yet
instance (priority := 999) of_algHom {R A B : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring A]
[CommSemiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B] (f : A →ₐ[R] B) :
@IsScalarTower R A B _ f.toRingHom.toAlgebra.toSMul _ :=
letI := (f : A →+* B).toAlgebra
of_algebraMap_eq fun x => (f.commutes x).symm
end Semiring
end IsScalarTower
section Homs
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Semiring A] [Semiring B]
variable [Algebra R S] [Algebra S A] [Algebra S B]
variable [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
variable [IsScalarTower R S A] [IsScalarTower R S B]
variable {A S B}
open IsScalarTower
namespace AlgHom
/-- R ⟶ S induces S-Alg ⥤ R-Alg -/
def restrictScalars (f : A →ₐ[S] B) : A →ₐ[R] B :=
{ (f : A →+* B) with
commutes' := fun r => by
rw [algebraMap_apply R S A, algebraMap_apply R S B]
exact f.commutes (algebraMap R S r) }
theorem restrictScalars_apply (f : A →ₐ[S] B) (x : A) : f.restrictScalars R x = f x := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_restrictScalars (f : A →ₐ[S] B) : (f.restrictScalars R : A →+* B) = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_restrictScalars' (f : A →ₐ[S] B) : (restrictScalars R f : A → B) = f := rfl
theorem restrictScalars_injective :
Function.Injective (restrictScalars R : (A →ₐ[S] B) → A →ₐ[R] B) := fun _ _ h =>
AlgHom.ext (AlgHom.congr_fun h :)
end AlgHom
namespace AlgEquiv
/-- R ⟶ S induces S-Alg ⥤ R-Alg -/
def restrictScalars (f : A ≃ₐ[S] B) : A ≃ₐ[R] B :=
{ (f : A ≃+* B) with
commutes' := fun r => by
rw [algebraMap_apply R S A, algebraMap_apply R S B]
exact f.commutes (algebraMap R S r) }
theorem restrictScalars_apply (f : A ≃ₐ[S] B) (x : A) : f.restrictScalars R x = f x := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_restrictScalars (f : A ≃ₐ[S] B) : (f.restrictScalars R : A ≃+* B) = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_restrictScalars' (f : A ≃ₐ[S] B) : (restrictScalars R f : A → B) = f := rfl
theorem restrictScalars_injective :
Function.Injective (restrictScalars R : (A ≃ₐ[S] B) → A ≃ₐ[R] B) := fun _ _ h =>
AlgEquiv.ext (AlgEquiv.congr_fun h :)
end AlgEquiv
end Homs
namespace Submodule
variable {M}
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [AddCommMonoid M]
variable [Module R M] [Module A M] [IsScalarTower R A M]
/-- If `A` is an `R`-algebra such that the induced morphism `R →+* A` is surjective, then the
`R`-module generated by a set `X` equals the `A`-module generated by `X`. -/
theorem restrictScalars_span (hsur : Function.Surjective (algebraMap R A)) (X : Set M) :
restrictScalars R (span A X) = span R X := by
refine ((span_le_restrictScalars R A X).antisymm fun m hm => ?_).symm
refine span_induction subset_span (zero_mem _) (fun _ _ _ _ => add_mem) (fun a m _ hm => ?_) hm
obtain ⟨r, rfl⟩ := hsur a
simpa [algebraMap_smul] using smul_mem _ r hm
theorem coe_span_eq_span_of_surjective (h : Function.Surjective (algebraMap R A)) (s : Set M) :
(Submodule.span A s : Set M) = Submodule.span R s :=
congr_arg ((↑) : Submodule R M → Set M) (Submodule.restrictScalars_span R A h s)
end Submodule
section Semiring
variable {R S A}
namespace Submodule
section Module
variable [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [AddCommMonoid A]
variable [Module R S] [Module S A] [Module R A] [IsScalarTower R S A]
open IsScalarTower
theorem smul_mem_span_smul_of_mem {s : Set S} {t : Set A} {k : S} (hks : k ∈ span R s) {x : A}
(hx : x ∈ t) : k • x ∈ span R (s • t) :=
span_induction (fun _ hc => subset_span <| Set.smul_mem_smul hc hx)
(by rw [zero_smul]; exact zero_mem _)
(fun c₁ c₂ _ _ ih₁ ih₂ => by rw [add_smul]; exact add_mem ih₁ ih₂)
(fun b c _ hc => by rw [IsScalarTower.smul_assoc]; exact smul_mem _ _ hc) hks
theorem span_smul_of_span_eq_top {s : Set S} (hs : span R s = ⊤) (t : Set A) :
span R (s • t) = (span S t).restrictScalars R :=
le_antisymm
(span_le.2 fun _x ⟨p, _hps, _q, hqt, hpqx⟩ ↦ hpqx ▸ (span S t).smul_mem p (subset_span hqt))
fun _ hp ↦ closure_induction (hx := hp) (zero_mem _) (fun _ _ _ _ ↦ add_mem) fun s0 y hy ↦ by
refine span_induction (fun x hx ↦ subset_span <| by exact ⟨x, hx, y, hy, rfl⟩) ?_ ?_ ?_
(hs ▸ mem_top : s0 ∈ span R s)
· rw [zero_smul]; apply zero_mem
· intro _ _ _ _; rw [add_smul]; apply add_mem
· intro r s0 _ hy; rw [IsScalarTower.smul_assoc]; exact smul_mem _ r hy
-- The following two lemmas were originally used to prove `span_smul_of_span_eq_top`
-- but are now not needed.
theorem smul_mem_span_smul' {s : Set S} (hs : span R s = ⊤) {t : Set A} {k : S} {x : A}
(hx : x ∈ span R (s • t)) : k • x ∈ span R (s • t) := by
rw [span_smul_of_span_eq_top hs] at hx ⊢; exact (span S t).smul_mem k hx
theorem smul_mem_span_smul {s : Set S} (hs : span R s = ⊤) {t : Set A} {k : S} {x : A}
(hx : x ∈ span R t) : k • x ∈ span R (s • t) := by
rw [span_smul_of_span_eq_top hs]
exact (span S t).smul_mem k (span_le_restrictScalars R S t hx)
end Module
section Algebra
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring S] [AddCommMonoid A]
variable [Algebra R S] [Module S A] [Module R A] [IsScalarTower R S A]
/-- A variant of `Submodule.span_image` for `algebraMap`. -/
theorem span_algebraMap_image (a : Set R) :
Submodule.span R (algebraMap R S '' a) = (Submodule.span R a).map (Algebra.linearMap R S) :=
(Submodule.span_image <| Algebra.linearMap R S).trans rfl
theorem span_algebraMap_image_of_tower {S T : Type*} [CommSemiring S] [Semiring T] [Module R S]
[Algebra R T] [Algebra S T] [IsScalarTower R S T] (a : Set S) :
Submodule.span R (algebraMap S T '' a) =
(Submodule.span R a).map ((Algebra.linearMap S T).restrictScalars R) :=
(Submodule.span_image <| (Algebra.linearMap S T).restrictScalars R).trans rfl
theorem map_mem_span_algebraMap_image {S T : Type*} [CommSemiring S] [Semiring T] [Algebra R S]
[Algebra R T] [Algebra S T] [IsScalarTower R S T] (x : S) (a : Set S)
(hx : x ∈ Submodule.span R a) : algebraMap S T x ∈ Submodule.span R (algebraMap S T '' a) := by
rw [span_algebraMap_image_of_tower, mem_map]
exact ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
|
end Algebra
| Mathlib/Algebra/Algebra/Tower.lean | 318 | 320 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Devon Tuma, Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Opposite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Membership
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Associated
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Opposite
/-!
# Non-zero divisors and smul-divisors
In this file we define the submonoid `nonZeroDivisors` and `nonZeroSMulDivisors` of a
`MonoidWithZero`. We also define `nonZeroDivisorsLeft` and `nonZeroDivisorsRight` for
non-commutative monoids.
## Notations
This file declares the notations:
- `M₀⁰` for the submonoid of non-zero-divisors of `M₀`, in the locale `nonZeroDivisors`.
- `M₀⁰[M]` for the submonoid of non-zero smul-divisors of `M₀` with respect to `M`, in the locale
`nonZeroSMulDivisors`
Use the statement `open scoped nonZeroDivisors nonZeroSMulDivisors` to access this notation in
your own code.
-/
assert_not_exists Ring
open Function
section
variable (M₀ : Type*) [MonoidWithZero M₀] {x : M₀}
/-- The collection of elements of a `MonoidWithZero` that are not left zero divisors form a
`Submonoid`. -/
def nonZeroDivisorsLeft : Submonoid M₀ where
carrier := {x | ∀ y, y * x = 0 → y = 0}
one_mem' := by simp
mul_mem' {x} {y} hx hy := fun z hz ↦ hx _ <| hy _ (mul_assoc z x y ▸ hz)
@[simp]
lemma mem_nonZeroDivisorsLeft_iff : x ∈ nonZeroDivisorsLeft M₀ ↔ ∀ y, y * x = 0 → y = 0 := .rfl
lemma nmem_nonZeroDivisorsLeft_iff :
x ∉ nonZeroDivisorsLeft M₀ ↔ {y | y * x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0}.Nonempty := by
simpa [mem_nonZeroDivisorsLeft_iff] using Set.nonempty_def.symm
/-- The collection of elements of a `MonoidWithZero` that are not right zero divisors form a
`Submonoid`. -/
def nonZeroDivisorsRight : Submonoid M₀ where
carrier := {x | ∀ y, x * y = 0 → y = 0}
one_mem' := by simp
mul_mem' := fun {x} {y} hx hy z hz ↦ hy _ (hx _ ((mul_assoc x y z).symm ▸ hz))
@[simp]
lemma mem_nonZeroDivisorsRight_iff : x ∈ nonZeroDivisorsRight M₀ ↔ ∀ y, x * y = 0 → y = 0 := .rfl
|
lemma nmem_nonZeroDivisorsRight_iff :
x ∉ nonZeroDivisorsRight M₀ ↔ {y | x * y = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0}.Nonempty := by
| Mathlib/Algebra/GroupWithZero/NonZeroDivisors.lean | 60 | 62 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Fox Thomson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Fox Thomson, Martin Dvorak
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Kleene
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Hom.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Tactic.DeriveFintype
/-!
# Languages
This file contains the definition and operations on formal languages over an alphabet.
Note that "strings" are implemented as lists over the alphabet.
Union and concatenation define a [Kleene algebra](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kleene_algebra)
over the languages.
In addition to that, we define a reversal of a language and prove that it behaves well
with respect to other language operations.
## Notation
* `l + m`: union of languages `l` and `m`
* `l * m`: language of strings `x ++ y` such that `x ∈ l` and `y ∈ m`
* `l ^ n`: language of strings consisting of `n` members of `l` concatenated together
* `1`: language consisting of only the empty string.
This is because it is the unit of the `*` operator.
* `l∗`: Kleene's star – language of strings consisting of arbitrarily many
members of `l` concatenated together
(Note that this is the Unicode asterisk `∗`, and not the more common star `*`)
## Main definitions
* `Language α`: a set of strings over the alphabet `α`
* `l.map f`: transform a language `l` over `α` into a language over `β`
by translating through `f : α → β`
## Main theorems
* `Language.self_eq_mul_add_iff`: Arden's lemma – if a language `l` satisfies the equation
`l = m * l + n`, and `m` doesn't contain the empty string,
then `l` is the language `m∗ * n`
-/
open List Set Computability
universe v
variable {α β γ : Type*}
/-- A language is a set of strings over an alphabet. -/
def Language (α) :=
Set (List α)
namespace Language
instance : Membership (List α) (Language α) := ⟨Set.Mem⟩
instance : Singleton (List α) (Language α) := ⟨Set.singleton⟩
instance : Insert (List α) (Language α) := ⟨Set.insert⟩
instance instCompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra : CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra (Language α) :=
Set.instCompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra
variable {l m : Language α} {a b x : List α}
/-- Zero language has no elements. -/
instance : Zero (Language α) :=
⟨(∅ : Set _)⟩
/-- `1 : Language α` contains only one element `[]`. -/
instance : One (Language α) :=
⟨{[]}⟩
instance : Inhabited (Language α) := ⟨(∅ : Set _)⟩
/-- The sum of two languages is their union. -/
instance : Add (Language α) :=
⟨((· ∪ ·) : Set (List α) → Set (List α) → Set (List α))⟩
/-- The product of two languages `l` and `m` is the language made of the strings `x ++ y` where
`x ∈ l` and `y ∈ m`. -/
instance : Mul (Language α) :=
⟨image2 (· ++ ·)⟩
theorem zero_def : (0 : Language α) = (∅ : Set _) :=
rfl
theorem one_def : (1 : Language α) = ({[]} : Set (List α)) :=
rfl
theorem add_def (l m : Language α) : l + m = (l ∪ m : Set (List α)) :=
rfl
theorem mul_def (l m : Language α) : l * m = image2 (· ++ ·) l m :=
rfl
/-- The Kleene star of a language `L` is the set of all strings which can be written by
concatenating strings from `L`. -/
instance : KStar (Language α) := ⟨fun l ↦ {x | ∃ L : List (List α), x = L.flatten ∧ ∀ y ∈ L, y ∈ l}⟩
lemma kstar_def (l : Language α) : l∗ = {x | ∃ L : List (List α), x = L.flatten ∧ ∀ y ∈ L, y ∈ l} :=
rfl
@[ext]
theorem ext {l m : Language α} (h : ∀ (x : List α), x ∈ l ↔ x ∈ m) : l = m :=
Set.ext h
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_zero (x : List α) : x ∉ (0 : Language α) :=
id
@[simp]
theorem mem_one (x : List α) : x ∈ (1 : Language α) ↔ x = [] := by rfl
theorem nil_mem_one : [] ∈ (1 : Language α) :=
Set.mem_singleton _
theorem mem_add (l m : Language α) (x : List α) : x ∈ l + m ↔ x ∈ l ∨ x ∈ m :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_mul : x ∈ l * m ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, ∃ b ∈ m, a ++ b = x :=
mem_image2
theorem append_mem_mul : a ∈ l → b ∈ m → a ++ b ∈ l * m :=
mem_image2_of_mem
theorem mem_kstar : x ∈ l∗ ↔ ∃ L : List (List α), x = L.flatten ∧ ∀ y ∈ L, y ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
theorem join_mem_kstar {L : List (List α)} (h : ∀ y ∈ L, y ∈ l) : L.flatten ∈ l∗ :=
⟨L, rfl, h⟩
theorem nil_mem_kstar (l : Language α) : [] ∈ l∗ :=
⟨[], rfl, fun _ h ↦ by contradiction⟩
instance instSemiring : Semiring (Language α) where
add := (· + ·)
add_assoc := union_assoc
zero := 0
zero_add := empty_union
add_zero := union_empty
add_comm := union_comm
mul := (· * ·)
mul_assoc _ _ _ := image2_assoc append_assoc
zero_mul _ := image2_empty_left
mul_zero _ := image2_empty_right
one := 1
one_mul l := by simp [mul_def, one_def]
mul_one l := by simp [mul_def, one_def]
natCast n := if n = 0 then 0 else 1
natCast_zero := rfl
natCast_succ n := by cases n <;> simp [Nat.cast, add_def, zero_def]
left_distrib _ _ _ := image2_union_right
right_distrib _ _ _ := image2_union_left
nsmul := nsmulRec
@[simp]
theorem add_self (l : Language α) : l + l = l :=
sup_idem _
/-- Maps the alphabet of a language. -/
def map (f : α → β) : Language α →+* Language β where
toFun := image (List.map f)
map_zero' := image_empty _
map_one' := image_singleton
map_add' := image_union _
map_mul' _ _ := image_image2_distrib <| fun _ _ => map_append
@[simp]
theorem map_id (l : Language α) : map id l = l := by simp [map]
@[simp]
theorem map_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) (l : Language α) : map g (map f l) = map (g ∘ f) l := by
simp [map, image_image]
| lemma mem_kstar_iff_exists_nonempty {x : List α} :
x ∈ l∗ ↔ ∃ S : List (List α), x = S.flatten ∧ ∀ y ∈ S, y ∈ l ∧ y ≠ [] := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨S, rfl, h⟩
refine ⟨S.filter fun l ↦ !List.isEmpty l,
by simp [List.flatten_filter_not_isEmpty], fun y hy ↦ ?_⟩
simp only [mem_filter, Bool.not_eq_eq_eq_not, Bool.not_true, isEmpty_eq_false_iff, ne_eq] at hy
exact ⟨h y hy.1, hy.2⟩
· rintro ⟨S, hx, h⟩
exact ⟨S, hx, fun y hy ↦ (h y hy).1⟩
| Mathlib/Computability/Language.lean | 179 | 189 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.