Context stringlengths 227 76.5k | target stringlengths 0 11.6k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 16 3.69k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Slope
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.MeanValue
/-!
# Convexity of functions and derivatives
Here we relate convexity of functions `ℝ → ℝ` to properties of their derivatives.
## Main results
* `MonotoneOn.convexOn_of_deriv`, `convexOn_of_deriv2_nonneg` : if the derivative of a function
is increasing or its second derivative is nonnegative, then the original function is convex.
* `ConvexOn.monotoneOn_deriv`: if a function is convex and differentiable, then its derivative is
monotone.
-/
open Metric Set Asymptotics ContinuousLinearMap Filter
open scoped Topology NNReal
/-!
## Monotonicity of `f'` implies convexity of `f`
-/
/-- If a function `f` is continuous on a convex set `D ⊆ ℝ`, is differentiable on its interior,
and `f'` is monotone on the interior, then `f` is convex on `D`. -/
theorem MonotoneOn.convexOn_of_deriv {D : Set ℝ} (hD : Convex ℝ D) {f : ℝ → ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f D) (hf' : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (interior D))
(hf'_mono : MonotoneOn (deriv f) (interior D)) : ConvexOn ℝ D f :=
convexOn_of_slope_mono_adjacent hD
(by
intro x y z hx hz hxy hyz
-- First we prove some trivial inclusions
have hxzD : Icc x z ⊆ D := hD.ordConnected.out hx hz
have hxyD : Icc x y ⊆ D := (Icc_subset_Icc_right hyz.le).trans hxzD
have hxyD' : Ioo x y ⊆ interior D :=
subset_sUnion_of_mem ⟨isOpen_Ioo, Ioo_subset_Icc_self.trans hxyD⟩
have hyzD : Icc y z ⊆ D := (Icc_subset_Icc_left hxy.le).trans hxzD
have hyzD' : Ioo y z ⊆ interior D :=
subset_sUnion_of_mem ⟨isOpen_Ioo, Ioo_subset_Icc_self.trans hyzD⟩
-- Then we apply MVT to both `[x, y]` and `[y, z]`
obtain ⟨a, ⟨hxa, hay⟩, ha⟩ : ∃ a ∈ Ioo x y, deriv f a = (f y - f x) / (y - x) :=
exists_deriv_eq_slope f hxy (hf.mono hxyD) (hf'.mono hxyD')
obtain ⟨b, ⟨hyb, hbz⟩, hb⟩ : ∃ b ∈ Ioo y z, deriv f b = (f z - f y) / (z - y) :=
exists_deriv_eq_slope f hyz (hf.mono hyzD) (hf'.mono hyzD')
rw [← ha, ← hb]
exact hf'_mono (hxyD' ⟨hxa, hay⟩) (hyzD' ⟨hyb, hbz⟩) (hay.trans hyb).le)
/-- If a function `f` is continuous on a convex set `D ⊆ ℝ`, is differentiable on its interior,
and `f'` is antitone on the interior, then `f` is concave on `D`. -/
theorem AntitoneOn.concaveOn_of_deriv {D : Set ℝ} (hD : Convex ℝ D) {f : ℝ → ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f D) (hf' : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (interior D))
(h_anti : AntitoneOn (deriv f) (interior D)) : ConcaveOn ℝ D f :=
haveI : MonotoneOn (deriv (-f)) (interior D) := by
simpa only [← deriv.neg] using h_anti.neg
neg_convexOn_iff.mp (this.convexOn_of_deriv hD hf.neg hf'.neg)
theorem StrictMonoOn.exists_slope_lt_deriv_aux {x y : ℝ} {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc x y))
(hxy : x < y) (hf'_mono : StrictMonoOn (deriv f) (Ioo x y)) (h : ∀ w ∈ Ioo x y, deriv f w ≠ 0) :
∃ a ∈ Ioo x y, (f y - f x) / (y - x) < deriv f a := by
have A : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (Ioo x y) := fun w wmem =>
(differentiableAt_of_deriv_ne_zero (h w wmem)).differentiableWithinAt
obtain ⟨a, ⟨hxa, hay⟩, ha⟩ : ∃ a ∈ Ioo x y, deriv f a = (f y - f x) / (y - x) :=
exists_deriv_eq_slope f hxy hf A
rcases nonempty_Ioo.2 hay with ⟨b, ⟨hab, hby⟩⟩
refine ⟨b, ⟨hxa.trans hab, hby⟩, ?_⟩
rw [← ha]
exact hf'_mono ⟨hxa, hay⟩ ⟨hxa.trans hab, hby⟩ hab
theorem StrictMonoOn.exists_slope_lt_deriv {x y : ℝ} {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc x y))
(hxy : x < y) (hf'_mono : StrictMonoOn (deriv f) (Ioo x y)) :
∃ a ∈ Ioo x y, (f y - f x) / (y - x) < deriv f a := by
by_cases h : ∀ w ∈ Ioo x y, deriv f w ≠ 0
· apply StrictMonoOn.exists_slope_lt_deriv_aux hf hxy hf'_mono h
· push_neg at h
rcases h with ⟨w, ⟨hxw, hwy⟩, hw⟩
obtain ⟨a, ⟨hxa, haw⟩, ha⟩ : ∃ a ∈ Ioo x w, (f w - f x) / (w - x) < deriv f a := by
apply StrictMonoOn.exists_slope_lt_deriv_aux _ hxw _ _
· exact hf.mono (Icc_subset_Icc le_rfl hwy.le)
· exact hf'_mono.mono (Ioo_subset_Ioo le_rfl hwy.le)
· intro z hz
rw [← hw]
apply ne_of_lt
exact hf'_mono ⟨hz.1, hz.2.trans hwy⟩ ⟨hxw, hwy⟩ hz.2
obtain ⟨b, ⟨hwb, hby⟩, hb⟩ : ∃ b ∈ Ioo w y, (f y - f w) / (y - w) < deriv f b := by
apply StrictMonoOn.exists_slope_lt_deriv_aux _ hwy _ _
· refine hf.mono (Icc_subset_Icc hxw.le le_rfl)
· exact hf'_mono.mono (Ioo_subset_Ioo hxw.le le_rfl)
· intro z hz
rw [← hw]
apply ne_of_gt
exact hf'_mono ⟨hxw, hwy⟩ ⟨hxw.trans hz.1, hz.2⟩ hz.1
refine ⟨b, ⟨hxw.trans hwb, hby⟩, ?_⟩
simp only [div_lt_iff₀, hxy, hxw, hwy, sub_pos] at ha hb ⊢
have : deriv f a * (w - x) < deriv f b * (w - x) := by
apply mul_lt_mul _ le_rfl (sub_pos.2 hxw) _
· exact hf'_mono ⟨hxa, haw.trans hwy⟩ ⟨hxw.trans hwb, hby⟩ (haw.trans hwb)
· rw [← hw]
exact (hf'_mono ⟨hxw, hwy⟩ ⟨hxw.trans hwb, hby⟩ hwb).le
linarith
theorem StrictMonoOn.exists_deriv_lt_slope_aux {x y : ℝ} {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc x y))
(hxy : x < y) (hf'_mono : StrictMonoOn (deriv f) (Ioo x y)) (h : ∀ w ∈ Ioo x y, deriv f w ≠ 0) :
∃ a ∈ Ioo x y, deriv f a < (f y - f x) / (y - x) := by
have A : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (Ioo x y) := fun w wmem =>
(differentiableAt_of_deriv_ne_zero (h w wmem)).differentiableWithinAt
obtain ⟨a, ⟨hxa, hay⟩, ha⟩ : ∃ a ∈ Ioo x y, deriv f a = (f y - f x) / (y - x) :=
exists_deriv_eq_slope f hxy hf A
rcases nonempty_Ioo.2 hxa with ⟨b, ⟨hxb, hba⟩⟩
refine ⟨b, ⟨hxb, hba.trans hay⟩, ?_⟩
rw [← ha]
exact hf'_mono ⟨hxb, hba.trans hay⟩ ⟨hxa, hay⟩ hba
theorem StrictMonoOn.exists_deriv_lt_slope {x y : ℝ} {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc x y))
(hxy : x < y) (hf'_mono : StrictMonoOn (deriv f) (Ioo x y)) :
∃ a ∈ Ioo x y, deriv f a < (f y - f x) / (y - x) := by
by_cases h : ∀ w ∈ Ioo x y, deriv f w ≠ 0
· apply StrictMonoOn.exists_deriv_lt_slope_aux hf hxy hf'_mono h
· push_neg at h
rcases h with ⟨w, ⟨hxw, hwy⟩, hw⟩
obtain ⟨a, ⟨hxa, haw⟩, ha⟩ : ∃ a ∈ Ioo x w, deriv f a < (f w - f x) / (w - x) := by
apply StrictMonoOn.exists_deriv_lt_slope_aux _ hxw _ _
· exact hf.mono (Icc_subset_Icc le_rfl hwy.le)
· exact hf'_mono.mono (Ioo_subset_Ioo le_rfl hwy.le)
· intro z hz
rw [← hw]
apply ne_of_lt
exact hf'_mono ⟨hz.1, hz.2.trans hwy⟩ ⟨hxw, hwy⟩ hz.2
obtain ⟨b, ⟨hwb, hby⟩, hb⟩ : ∃ b ∈ Ioo w y, deriv f b < (f y - f w) / (y - w) := by
apply StrictMonoOn.exists_deriv_lt_slope_aux _ hwy _ _
· refine hf.mono (Icc_subset_Icc hxw.le le_rfl)
· exact hf'_mono.mono (Ioo_subset_Ioo hxw.le le_rfl)
· intro z hz
rw [← hw]
apply ne_of_gt
exact hf'_mono ⟨hxw, hwy⟩ ⟨hxw.trans hz.1, hz.2⟩ hz.1
refine ⟨a, ⟨hxa, haw.trans hwy⟩, ?_⟩
simp only [lt_div_iff₀, hxy, hxw, hwy, sub_pos] at ha hb ⊢
have : deriv f a * (y - w) < deriv f b * (y - w) := by
apply mul_lt_mul _ le_rfl (sub_pos.2 hwy) _
· exact hf'_mono ⟨hxa, haw.trans hwy⟩ ⟨hxw.trans hwb, hby⟩ (haw.trans hwb)
· rw [← hw]
exact (hf'_mono ⟨hxw, hwy⟩ ⟨hxw.trans hwb, hby⟩ hwb).le
linarith
/-- If a function `f` is continuous on a convex set `D ⊆ ℝ`, and `f'` is strictly monotone on the
interior, then `f` is strictly convex on `D`.
Note that we don't require differentiability, since it is guaranteed at all but at most
one point by the strict monotonicity of `f'`. -/
theorem StrictMonoOn.strictConvexOn_of_deriv {D : Set ℝ} (hD : Convex ℝ D) {f : ℝ → ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f D) (hf' : StrictMonoOn (deriv f) (interior D)) : StrictConvexOn ℝ D f :=
strictConvexOn_of_slope_strict_mono_adjacent hD fun {x y z} hx hz hxy hyz => by
-- First we prove some trivial inclusions
have hxzD : Icc x z ⊆ D := hD.ordConnected.out hx hz
have hxyD : Icc x y ⊆ D := (Icc_subset_Icc_right hyz.le).trans hxzD
have hxyD' : Ioo x y ⊆ interior D :=
subset_sUnion_of_mem ⟨isOpen_Ioo, Ioo_subset_Icc_self.trans hxyD⟩
have hyzD : Icc y z ⊆ D := (Icc_subset_Icc_left hxy.le).trans hxzD
have hyzD' : Ioo y z ⊆ interior D :=
subset_sUnion_of_mem ⟨isOpen_Ioo, Ioo_subset_Icc_self.trans hyzD⟩
-- Then we get points `a` and `b` in each interval `[x, y]` and `[y, z]` where the derivatives
-- can be compared to the slopes between `x, y` and `y, z` respectively.
obtain ⟨a, ⟨hxa, hay⟩, ha⟩ : ∃ a ∈ Ioo x y, (f y - f x) / (y - x) < deriv f a :=
StrictMonoOn.exists_slope_lt_deriv (hf.mono hxyD) hxy (hf'.mono hxyD')
obtain ⟨b, ⟨hyb, hbz⟩, hb⟩ : ∃ b ∈ Ioo y z, deriv f b < (f z - f y) / (z - y) :=
StrictMonoOn.exists_deriv_lt_slope (hf.mono hyzD) hyz (hf'.mono hyzD')
apply ha.trans (lt_trans _ hb)
exact hf' (hxyD' ⟨hxa, hay⟩) (hyzD' ⟨hyb, hbz⟩) (hay.trans hyb)
/-- If a function `f` is continuous on a convex set `D ⊆ ℝ` and `f'` is strictly antitone on the
interior, then `f` is strictly concave on `D`.
Note that we don't require differentiability, since it is guaranteed at all but at most
one point by the strict antitonicity of `f'`. -/
theorem StrictAntiOn.strictConcaveOn_of_deriv {D : Set ℝ} (hD : Convex ℝ D) {f : ℝ → ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f D) (h_anti : StrictAntiOn (deriv f) (interior D)) :
StrictConcaveOn ℝ D f :=
have : StrictMonoOn (deriv (-f)) (interior D) := by simpa only [← deriv.neg] using h_anti.neg
neg_neg f ▸ (this.strictConvexOn_of_deriv hD hf.neg).neg
/-- If a function `f` is differentiable and `f'` is monotone on `ℝ` then `f` is convex. -/
theorem Monotone.convexOn_univ_of_deriv {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : Differentiable ℝ f)
(hf'_mono : Monotone (deriv f)) : ConvexOn ℝ univ f :=
(hf'_mono.monotoneOn _).convexOn_of_deriv convex_univ hf.continuous.continuousOn
hf.differentiableOn
/-- If a function `f` is differentiable and `f'` is antitone on `ℝ` then `f` is concave. -/
theorem Antitone.concaveOn_univ_of_deriv {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : Differentiable ℝ f)
(hf'_anti : Antitone (deriv f)) : ConcaveOn ℝ univ f :=
(hf'_anti.antitoneOn _).concaveOn_of_deriv convex_univ hf.continuous.continuousOn
hf.differentiableOn
/-- If a function `f` is continuous and `f'` is strictly monotone on `ℝ` then `f` is strictly
convex. Note that we don't require differentiability, since it is guaranteed at all but at most
one point by the strict monotonicity of `f'`. -/
theorem StrictMono.strictConvexOn_univ_of_deriv {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : Continuous f)
(hf'_mono : StrictMono (deriv f)) : StrictConvexOn ℝ univ f :=
(hf'_mono.strictMonoOn _).strictConvexOn_of_deriv convex_univ hf.continuousOn
/-- If a function `f` is continuous and `f'` is strictly antitone on `ℝ` then `f` is strictly
concave. Note that we don't require differentiability, since it is guaranteed at all but at most
one point by the strict antitonicity of `f'`. -/
theorem StrictAnti.strictConcaveOn_univ_of_deriv {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : Continuous f)
(hf'_anti : StrictAnti (deriv f)) : StrictConcaveOn ℝ univ f :=
(hf'_anti.strictAntiOn _).strictConcaveOn_of_deriv convex_univ hf.continuousOn
/-- If a function `f` is continuous on a convex set `D ⊆ ℝ`, is twice differentiable on its
interior, and `f''` is nonnegative on the interior, then `f` is convex on `D`. -/
theorem convexOn_of_deriv2_nonneg {D : Set ℝ} (hD : Convex ℝ D) {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : ContinuousOn f D)
(hf' : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (interior D)) (hf'' : DifferentiableOn ℝ (deriv f) (interior D))
(hf''_nonneg : ∀ x ∈ interior D, 0 ≤ deriv^[2] f x) : ConvexOn ℝ D f :=
(monotoneOn_of_deriv_nonneg hD.interior hf''.continuousOn (by rwa [interior_interior]) <| by
rwa [interior_interior]).convexOn_of_deriv
hD hf hf'
/-- If a function `f` is continuous on a convex set `D ⊆ ℝ`, is twice differentiable on its
interior, and `f''` is nonpositive on the interior, then `f` is concave on `D`. -/
theorem concaveOn_of_deriv2_nonpos {D : Set ℝ} (hD : Convex ℝ D) {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : ContinuousOn f D)
(hf' : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (interior D)) (hf'' : DifferentiableOn ℝ (deriv f) (interior D))
(hf''_nonpos : ∀ x ∈ interior D, deriv^[2] f x ≤ 0) : ConcaveOn ℝ D f :=
(antitoneOn_of_deriv_nonpos hD.interior hf''.continuousOn (by rwa [interior_interior]) <| by
rwa [interior_interior]).concaveOn_of_deriv
hD hf hf'
/-- If a function `f` is continuous on a convex set `D ⊆ ℝ`, is twice differentiable on its
interior, and `f''` is nonnegative on the interior, then `f` is convex on `D`. -/
lemma convexOn_of_hasDerivWithinAt2_nonneg {D : Set ℝ} (hD : Convex ℝ D) {f f' f'' : ℝ → ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f D) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ interior D, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (interior D) x)
(hf'' : ∀ x ∈ interior D, HasDerivWithinAt f' (f'' x) (interior D) x)
(hf''₀ : ∀ x ∈ interior D, 0 ≤ f'' x) : ConvexOn ℝ D f := by
have : (interior D).EqOn (deriv f) f' := deriv_eqOn isOpen_interior hf'
refine convexOn_of_deriv2_nonneg hD hf (fun x hx ↦ (hf' _ hx).differentiableWithinAt) ?_ ?_
· rw [differentiableOn_congr this]
exact fun x hx ↦ (hf'' _ hx).differentiableWithinAt
· rintro x hx
convert hf''₀ _ hx using 1
dsimp
rw [deriv_eqOn isOpen_interior (fun y hy ↦ ?_) hx]
exact (hf'' _ hy).congr this <| by rw [this hy]
/-- If a function `f` is continuous on a convex set `D ⊆ ℝ`, is twice differentiable on its
interior, and `f''` is nonpositive on the interior, then `f` is concave on `D`. -/
lemma concaveOn_of_hasDerivWithinAt2_nonpos {D : Set ℝ} (hD : Convex ℝ D) {f f' f'' : ℝ → ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f D) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ interior D, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (interior D) x)
(hf'' : ∀ x ∈ interior D, HasDerivWithinAt f' (f'' x) (interior D) x)
(hf''₀ : ∀ x ∈ interior D, f'' x ≤ 0) : ConcaveOn ℝ D f := by
have : (interior D).EqOn (deriv f) f' := deriv_eqOn isOpen_interior hf'
refine concaveOn_of_deriv2_nonpos hD hf (fun x hx ↦ (hf' _ hx).differentiableWithinAt) ?_ ?_
· rw [differentiableOn_congr this]
exact fun x hx ↦ (hf'' _ hx).differentiableWithinAt
· rintro x hx
convert hf''₀ _ hx using 1
dsimp
rw [deriv_eqOn isOpen_interior (fun y hy ↦ ?_) hx]
exact (hf'' _ hy).congr this <| by rw [this hy]
/-- If a function `f` is continuous on a convex set `D ⊆ ℝ` and `f''` is strictly positive on the
interior, then `f` is strictly convex on `D`.
Note that we don't require twice differentiability explicitly as it is already implied by the second
derivative being strictly positive, except at at most one point. -/
theorem strictConvexOn_of_deriv2_pos {D : Set ℝ} (hD : Convex ℝ D) {f : ℝ → ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f D) (hf'' : ∀ x ∈ interior D, 0 < (deriv^[2] f) x) :
StrictConvexOn ℝ D f :=
((strictMonoOn_of_deriv_pos hD.interior fun z hz =>
(differentiableAt_of_deriv_ne_zero
(hf'' z hz).ne').differentiableWithinAt.continuousWithinAt) <|
by rwa [interior_interior]).strictConvexOn_of_deriv
hD hf
/-- If a function `f` is continuous on a convex set `D ⊆ ℝ` and `f''` is strictly negative on the
interior, then `f` is strictly concave on `D`.
Note that we don't require twice differentiability explicitly as it already implied by the second
derivative being strictly negative, except at at most one point. -/
theorem strictConcaveOn_of_deriv2_neg {D : Set ℝ} (hD : Convex ℝ D) {f : ℝ → ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f D) (hf'' : ∀ x ∈ interior D, deriv^[2] f x < 0) :
StrictConcaveOn ℝ D f :=
((strictAntiOn_of_deriv_neg hD.interior fun z hz =>
(differentiableAt_of_deriv_ne_zero
(hf'' z hz).ne).differentiableWithinAt.continuousWithinAt) <|
by rwa [interior_interior]).strictConcaveOn_of_deriv
hD hf
/-- If a function `f` is twice differentiable on an open convex set `D ⊆ ℝ` and
`f''` is nonnegative on `D`, then `f` is convex on `D`. -/
theorem convexOn_of_deriv2_nonneg' {D : Set ℝ} (hD : Convex ℝ D) {f : ℝ → ℝ}
(hf' : DifferentiableOn ℝ f D) (hf'' : DifferentiableOn ℝ (deriv f) D)
(hf''_nonneg : ∀ x ∈ D, 0 ≤ (deriv^[2] f) x) : ConvexOn ℝ D f :=
convexOn_of_deriv2_nonneg hD hf'.continuousOn (hf'.mono interior_subset)
(hf''.mono interior_subset) fun x hx => hf''_nonneg x (interior_subset hx)
/-- If a function `f` is twice differentiable on an open convex set `D ⊆ ℝ` and
`f''` is nonpositive on `D`, then `f` is concave on `D`. -/
theorem concaveOn_of_deriv2_nonpos' {D : Set ℝ} (hD : Convex ℝ D) {f : ℝ → ℝ}
(hf' : DifferentiableOn ℝ f D) (hf'' : DifferentiableOn ℝ (deriv f) D)
(hf''_nonpos : ∀ x ∈ D, deriv^[2] f x ≤ 0) : ConcaveOn ℝ D f :=
concaveOn_of_deriv2_nonpos hD hf'.continuousOn (hf'.mono interior_subset)
(hf''.mono interior_subset) fun x hx => hf''_nonpos x (interior_subset hx)
/-- If a function `f` is continuous on a convex set `D ⊆ ℝ` and `f''` is strictly positive on `D`,
then `f` is strictly convex on `D`.
Note that we don't require twice differentiability explicitly as it is already implied by the second
derivative being strictly positive, except at at most one point. -/
theorem strictConvexOn_of_deriv2_pos' {D : Set ℝ} (hD : Convex ℝ D) {f : ℝ → ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f D) (hf'' : ∀ x ∈ D, 0 < (deriv^[2] f) x) : StrictConvexOn ℝ D f :=
strictConvexOn_of_deriv2_pos hD hf fun x hx => hf'' x (interior_subset hx)
/-- If a function `f` is continuous on a convex set `D ⊆ ℝ` and `f''` is strictly negative on `D`,
then `f` is strictly concave on `D`.
Note that we don't require twice differentiability explicitly as it is already implied by the second
derivative being strictly negative, except at at most one point. -/
theorem strictConcaveOn_of_deriv2_neg' {D : Set ℝ} (hD : Convex ℝ D) {f : ℝ → ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f D) (hf'' : ∀ x ∈ D, deriv^[2] f x < 0) : StrictConcaveOn ℝ D f :=
strictConcaveOn_of_deriv2_neg hD hf fun x hx => hf'' x (interior_subset hx)
/-- If a function `f` is twice differentiable on `ℝ`, and `f''` is nonnegative on `ℝ`,
then `f` is convex on `ℝ`. -/
theorem convexOn_univ_of_deriv2_nonneg {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf' : Differentiable ℝ f)
(hf'' : Differentiable ℝ (deriv f)) (hf''_nonneg : ∀ x, 0 ≤ (deriv^[2] f) x) :
ConvexOn ℝ univ f :=
convexOn_of_deriv2_nonneg' convex_univ hf'.differentiableOn hf''.differentiableOn fun x _ =>
hf''_nonneg x
/-- If a function `f` is twice differentiable on `ℝ`, and `f''` is nonpositive on `ℝ`,
then `f` is concave on `ℝ`. -/
theorem concaveOn_univ_of_deriv2_nonpos {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf' : Differentiable ℝ f)
(hf'' : Differentiable ℝ (deriv f)) (hf''_nonpos : ∀ x, deriv^[2] f x ≤ 0) :
ConcaveOn ℝ univ f :=
concaveOn_of_deriv2_nonpos' convex_univ hf'.differentiableOn hf''.differentiableOn fun x _ =>
hf''_nonpos x
/-- If a function `f` is continuous on `ℝ`, and `f''` is strictly positive on `ℝ`,
then `f` is strictly convex on `ℝ`.
Note that we don't require twice differentiability explicitly as it is already implied by the second
derivative being strictly positive, except at at most one point. -/
theorem strictConvexOn_univ_of_deriv2_pos {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : Continuous f)
(hf'' : ∀ x, 0 < (deriv^[2] f) x) : StrictConvexOn ℝ univ f :=
strictConvexOn_of_deriv2_pos' convex_univ hf.continuousOn fun x _ => hf'' x
/-- If a function `f` is continuous on `ℝ`, and `f''` is strictly negative on `ℝ`,
then `f` is strictly concave on `ℝ`.
Note that we don't require twice differentiability explicitly as it is already implied by the second
derivative being strictly negative, except at at most one point. -/
theorem strictConcaveOn_univ_of_deriv2_neg {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : Continuous f)
(hf'' : ∀ x, deriv^[2] f x < 0) : StrictConcaveOn ℝ univ f :=
strictConcaveOn_of_deriv2_neg' convex_univ hf.continuousOn fun x _ => hf'' x
/-!
## Convexity of `f` implies monotonicity of `f'`
In this section we prove inequalities relating derivatives of convex functions to slopes of secant
lines, and deduce that if `f` is convex then its derivative is monotone (and similarly for strict
convexity / strict monotonicity).
-/
section slope
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [Field 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜]
{s : Set 𝕜} {f : 𝕜 → 𝕜} {x : 𝕜}
/-- If `f : 𝕜 → 𝕜` is convex on `s`, then for any point `x ∈ s` the slope of the secant line of `f`
through `x` is monotone on `s \ {x}`. -/
lemma ConvexOn.slope_mono (hfc : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hx : x ∈ s) : MonotoneOn (slope f x) (s \ {x}) :=
(slope_fun_def_field f _).symm ▸ fun _ hy _ hz hz' ↦ hfc.secant_mono hx (mem_of_mem_diff hy)
(mem_of_mem_diff hz) (not_mem_of_mem_diff hy :) (not_mem_of_mem_diff hz :) hz'
lemma ConvexOn.monotoneOn_slope_gt (hfc : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hxs : x ∈ s) :
MonotoneOn (slope f x) {y ∈ s | x < y} :=
(hfc.slope_mono hxs).mono fun _ ⟨h1, h2⟩ ↦ ⟨h1, h2.ne'⟩
lemma ConvexOn.monotoneOn_slope_lt (hfc : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hxs : x ∈ s) :
MonotoneOn (slope f x) {y ∈ s | y < x} :=
(hfc.slope_mono hxs).mono fun _ ⟨h1, h2⟩ ↦ ⟨h1, h2.ne⟩
/-- If `f : 𝕜 → 𝕜` is concave on `s`, then for any point `x ∈ s` the slope of the secant line of `f`
through `x` is antitone on `s \ {x}`. -/
lemma ConcaveOn.slope_anti (hfc : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hx : x ∈ s) :
AntitoneOn (slope f x) (s \ {x}) := by
rw [← neg_neg f, slope_neg_fun]
exact (ConvexOn.slope_mono hfc.neg hx).neg
lemma ConcaveOn.antitoneOn_slope_gt (hfc : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hxs : x ∈ s) :
AntitoneOn (slope f x) {y ∈ s | x < y} :=
(hfc.slope_anti hxs).mono fun _ ⟨h1, h2⟩ ↦ ⟨h1, h2.ne'⟩
lemma ConcaveOn.antitoneOn_slope_lt (hfc : ConcaveOn 𝕜 s f) (hxs : x ∈ s) :
AntitoneOn (slope f x) {y ∈ s | y < x} :=
(hfc.slope_anti hxs).mono fun _ ⟨h1, h2⟩ ↦ ⟨h1, h2.ne⟩
variable [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [OrderTopology 𝕜]
lemma bddBelow_slope_lt_of_mem_interior (hfc : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hxs : x ∈ interior s) :
BddBelow (slope f x '' {y ∈ s | x < y}) := by
obtain ⟨y, hyx, hys⟩ : ∃ y, y < x ∧ y ∈ s :=
Eventually.exists_lt (mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.mp hxs)
refine bddBelow_iff_subset_Ici.mpr ⟨slope f x y, fun y' ⟨z, hz, hz'⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
simp_rw [mem_Ici, ← hz']
refine hfc.slope_mono (interior_subset hxs) ?_ ?_ (hyx.trans hz.2).le
· simp [hys, hyx.ne]
· simp [hz.2.ne', hz.1]
lemma bddAbove_slope_gt_of_mem_interior (hfc : ConvexOn 𝕜 s f) (hxs : x ∈ interior s) :
BddAbove (slope f x '' {y ∈ s | y < x}) := by
obtain ⟨y, hyx, hys⟩ : ∃ y, x < y ∧ y ∈ s :=
Eventually.exists_gt (mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.mp hxs)
refine bddAbove_iff_subset_Iic.mpr ⟨slope f x y, fun y' ⟨z, hz, hz'⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
simp_rw [mem_Iic, ← hz']
refine hfc.slope_mono (interior_subset hxs) ?_ ?_ (hz.2.trans hyx).le
· simp [hz.2.ne, hz.1]
· simp [hys, hyx.ne']
end slope
namespace ConvexOn
variable {S : Set ℝ} {f : ℝ → ℝ} {x y f' : ℝ}
section Interior
/-!
### Left and right derivative of a convex function in the interior of the set
-/
lemma hasDerivWithinAt_sInf_slope_of_mem_interior (hfc : ConvexOn ℝ S f) (hxs : x ∈ interior S) :
HasDerivWithinAt f (sInf (slope f x '' {y ∈ S | x < y})) (Ioi x) x := by
have hxs' := hxs
rw [mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, mem_nhds_iff_exists_Ioo_subset] at hxs'
obtain ⟨a, b, hxab, habs⟩ := hxs'
simp_rw [hasDerivWithinAt_iff_tendsto_slope]
simp only [mem_Ioi, lt_self_iff_false, not_false_eq_true, diff_singleton_eq_self]
have h : Ioo x b ⊆ {y | y ∈ S ∧ x < y} := fun z hz ↦ ⟨habs ⟨hxab.1.trans hz.1, hz.2⟩, hz.1⟩
have h_Ioo : Tendsto (slope f x) (𝓝[>] x) (𝓝 (sInf (slope f x '' Ioo x b))) :=
((monotoneOn_slope_gt hfc (habs hxab)).mono h).tendsto_nhdsWithin_Ioo_right
(by simpa using hxab.2) ((bddBelow_slope_lt_of_mem_interior hfc hxs).mono (image_subset _ h))
suffices sInf (slope f x '' Ioo x b) = sInf (slope f x '' {y ∈ S | x < y}) by rwa [← this]
apply (monotoneOn_slope_gt hfc (habs hxab)).csInf_eq_of_subset_of_forall_exists_le
(bddBelow_slope_lt_of_mem_interior hfc hxs) h ?_
rintro y ⟨hyS, hxy⟩
obtain ⟨z, hxz, hzy⟩ := exists_between (lt_min hxab.2 hxy)
exact ⟨z, ⟨hxz, hzy.trans_le (min_le_left _ _)⟩, hzy.le.trans (min_le_right _ _)⟩
lemma hasDerivWithinAt_sSup_slope_of_mem_interior (hfc : ConvexOn ℝ S f) (hxs : x ∈ interior S) :
HasDerivWithinAt f (sSup (slope f x '' {y ∈ S | y < x})) (Iio x) x := by
have hxs' := hxs
rw [mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, mem_nhds_iff_exists_Ioo_subset] at hxs'
obtain ⟨a, b, hxab, habs⟩ := hxs'
simp_rw [hasDerivWithinAt_iff_tendsto_slope]
simp only [mem_Iio, lt_self_iff_false, not_false_eq_true, diff_singleton_eq_self]
have h : Ioo a x ⊆ {y | y ∈ S ∧ y < x} := fun z hz ↦ ⟨habs ⟨hz.1, hz.2.trans hxab.2⟩, hz.2⟩
have h_Ioo : Tendsto (slope f x) (𝓝[<] x) (𝓝 (sSup (slope f x '' Ioo a x))) :=
((monotoneOn_slope_lt hfc (habs hxab)).mono h).tendsto_nhdsWithin_Ioo_left
(by simpa using hxab.1) ((bddAbove_slope_gt_of_mem_interior hfc hxs).mono (image_subset _ h))
suffices sSup (slope f x '' Ioo a x) = sSup (slope f x '' {y ∈ S | y < x}) by rwa [← this]
apply (monotoneOn_slope_lt hfc (habs hxab)).csSup_eq_of_subset_of_forall_exists_le
(bddAbove_slope_gt_of_mem_interior hfc hxs) h ?_
rintro y ⟨hyS, hyx⟩
obtain ⟨z, hyz, hzx⟩ := exists_between (max_lt hxab.1 hyx)
exact ⟨z, ⟨(le_max_left _ _).trans_lt hyz, hzx⟩, (le_max_right _ _).trans hyz.le⟩
lemma differentiableWithinAt_Ioi_of_mem_interior (hfc : ConvexOn ℝ S f) (hxs : x ∈ interior S) :
DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f (Ioi x) x :=
(hfc.hasDerivWithinAt_sInf_slope_of_mem_interior hxs).differentiableWithinAt
lemma differentiableWithinAt_Iio_of_mem_interior (hfc : ConvexOn ℝ S f) (hxs : x ∈ interior S) :
DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f (Iio x) x :=
(hfc.hasDerivWithinAt_sSup_slope_of_mem_interior hxs).differentiableWithinAt
lemma hasDerivWithinAt_rightDeriv_of_mem_interior (hfc : ConvexOn ℝ S f) (hxs : x ∈ interior S) :
HasDerivWithinAt f (derivWithin f (Ioi x) x) (Ioi x) x :=
(hfc.differentiableWithinAt_Ioi_of_mem_interior hxs).hasDerivWithinAt
lemma hasDerivWithinAt_leftDeriv_of_mem_interior (hfc : ConvexOn ℝ S f) (hxs : x ∈ interior S) :
HasDerivWithinAt f (derivWithin f (Iio x) x) (Iio x) x :=
(hfc.differentiableWithinAt_Iio_of_mem_interior hxs).hasDerivWithinAt
lemma rightDeriv_eq_sInf_slope_of_mem_interior (hfc : ConvexOn ℝ S f) (hxs : x ∈ interior S) :
derivWithin f (Ioi x) x = sInf (slope f x '' {y | y ∈ S ∧ x < y}) :=
(hfc.hasDerivWithinAt_sInf_slope_of_mem_interior hxs).derivWithin (uniqueDiffWithinAt_Ioi x)
lemma leftDeriv_eq_sSup_slope_of_mem_interior (hfc : ConvexOn ℝ S f) (hxs : x ∈ interior S) :
derivWithin f (Iio x) x = sSup (slope f x '' {y | y ∈ S ∧ y < x}) :=
(hfc.hasDerivWithinAt_sSup_slope_of_mem_interior hxs).derivWithin (uniqueDiffWithinAt_Iio x)
lemma monotoneOn_rightDeriv (hfc : ConvexOn ℝ S f) :
MonotoneOn (fun x ↦ derivWithin f (Ioi x) x) (interior S) := by
intro x hxs y hys hxy
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hxy with rfl | hxy; · rfl
simp_rw [hfc.rightDeriv_eq_sInf_slope_of_mem_interior hxs,
hfc.rightDeriv_eq_sInf_slope_of_mem_interior hys]
refine csInf_le_of_le (b := slope f x y) (bddBelow_slope_lt_of_mem_interior hfc hxs)
⟨y, by simp only [mem_setOf_eq, hxy, and_true]; exact interior_subset hys⟩
(le_csInf ?_ ?_)
· have hys' := hys
rw [mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, mem_nhds_iff_exists_Ioo_subset] at hys'
obtain ⟨a, b, hxab, habs⟩ := hys'
rw [image_nonempty]
obtain ⟨z, hxz, hzb⟩ := exists_between hxab.2
exact ⟨z, habs ⟨hxab.1.trans hxz, hzb⟩, hxz⟩
· rintro _ ⟨z, ⟨hzs, hyz : y < z⟩, rfl⟩
rw [slope_comm]
exact slope_mono hfc (interior_subset hys) ⟨interior_subset hxs, hxy.ne⟩ ⟨hzs, hyz.ne'⟩
(hxy.trans hyz).le
lemma monotoneOn_leftDeriv (hfc : ConvexOn ℝ S f) :
MonotoneOn (fun x ↦ derivWithin f (Iio x) x) (interior S) := by
intro x hxs y hys hxy
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hxy with rfl | hxy; · rfl
simp_rw [hfc.leftDeriv_eq_sSup_slope_of_mem_interior hxs,
hfc.leftDeriv_eq_sSup_slope_of_mem_interior hys]
refine le_csSup_of_le (b := slope f x y) (bddAbove_slope_gt_of_mem_interior hfc hys)
⟨x, by simp only [slope_comm, mem_setOf_eq, hxy, and_true]; exact interior_subset hxs⟩
(csSup_le ?_ ?_)
· have hxs' := hxs
rw [mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, mem_nhds_iff_exists_Ioo_subset] at hxs'
obtain ⟨a, b, hxab, habs⟩ := hxs'
rw [image_nonempty]
obtain ⟨z, hxz, hzb⟩ := exists_between hxab.1
exact ⟨z, habs ⟨hxz, hzb.trans hxab.2⟩, hzb⟩
· rintro _ ⟨z, ⟨hzs, hyz : z < x⟩, rfl⟩
exact slope_mono hfc (interior_subset hxs) ⟨hzs, hyz.ne⟩ ⟨interior_subset hys, hxy.ne'⟩
(hyz.trans hxy).le
lemma leftDeriv_le_rightDeriv_of_mem_interior (hfc : ConvexOn ℝ S f) (hxs : x ∈ interior S) :
derivWithin f (Iio x) x ≤ derivWithin f (Ioi x) x := by
have hxs' := hxs
rw [mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, mem_nhds_iff_exists_Ioo_subset] at hxs'
obtain ⟨a, b, hxab, habs⟩ := hxs'
rw [hfc.rightDeriv_eq_sInf_slope_of_mem_interior hxs,
hfc.leftDeriv_eq_sSup_slope_of_mem_interior hxs]
refine csSup_le ?_ ?_
· rw [image_nonempty]
obtain ⟨z, haz, hzx⟩ := exists_between hxab.1
exact ⟨z, habs ⟨haz, hzx.trans hxab.2⟩, hzx⟩
rintro _ ⟨z, ⟨hzs, hzx⟩, rfl⟩
refine le_csInf ?_ ?_
· rw [image_nonempty]
obtain ⟨z, hxz, hzb⟩ := exists_between hxab.2
exact ⟨z, habs ⟨hxab.1.trans hxz, hzb⟩, hxz⟩
rintro _ ⟨y, ⟨hys, hxy⟩, rfl⟩
exact slope_mono hfc (interior_subset hxs) ⟨hzs, hzx.ne⟩ ⟨hys, hxy.ne'⟩ (hzx.trans hxy).le
end Interior
section left
/-!
### Convex functions, derivative at left endpoint of secant
-/
/-- If `f : ℝ → ℝ` is convex on `S` and right-differentiable at `x ∈ S`, then the slope of any
secant line with left endpoint at `x` is bounded below by the right derivative of `f` at `x`. -/
lemma le_slope_of_hasDerivWithinAt_Ioi (hfc : ConvexOn ℝ S f)
(hx : x ∈ S) (hy : y ∈ S) (hxy : x < y) (hf' : HasDerivWithinAt f f' (Ioi x) x) :
f' ≤ slope f x y := by
apply le_of_tendsto <| (hasDerivWithinAt_iff_tendsto_slope' not_mem_Ioi_self).mp hf'
simp_rw [eventually_nhdsWithin_iff, slope_def_field]
filter_upwards [eventually_lt_nhds hxy] with t ht (ht' : x < t)
refine hfc.secant_mono hx (?_ : t ∈ S) hy ht'.ne' hxy.ne' ht.le
exact hfc.1.ordConnected.out hx hy ⟨ht'.le, ht.le⟩
/-- Reformulation of `ConvexOn.le_slope_of_hasDerivWithinAt_Ioi` using `derivWithin`. -/
lemma rightDeriv_le_slope (hfc : ConvexOn ℝ S f) (hx : x ∈ S) (hy : y ∈ S) (hxy : x < y)
(hfd : DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f (Ioi x) x) :
derivWithin f (Ioi x) x ≤ slope f x y :=
| le_slope_of_hasDerivWithinAt_Ioi hfc hx hy hxy hfd.hasDerivWithinAt
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-26")]
alias right_deriv_le_slope := rightDeriv_le_slope
lemma rightDeriv_le_slope_of_mem_interior (hfc : ConvexOn ℝ S f)
{y : ℝ} (hxs : x ∈ interior S) (hys : y ∈ S) (hxy : x < y) :
derivWithin f (Ioi x) x ≤ slope f x y :=
rightDeriv_le_slope hfc (interior_subset hxs) hys hxy
(differentiableWithinAt_Ioi_of_mem_interior hfc hxs)
/-- If `f : ℝ → ℝ` is convex on `S` and differentiable within `S` at `x`, then the slope of any
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Deriv.lean | 566 | 577 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Support
import Mathlib.Data.Set.SymmDiff
/-!
# Indicator function
- `Set.indicator (s : Set α) (f : α → β) (a : α)` is `f a` if `a ∈ s` and is `0` otherwise.
- `Set.mulIndicator (s : Set α) (f : α → β) (a : α)` is `f a` if `a ∈ s` and is `1` otherwise.
## Implementation note
In mathematics, an indicator function or a characteristic function is a function
used to indicate membership of an element in a set `s`,
having the value `1` for all elements of `s` and the value `0` otherwise.
But since it is usually used to restrict a function to a certain set `s`,
we let the indicator function take the value `f x` for some function `f`, instead of `1`.
If the usual indicator function is needed, just set `f` to be the constant function `fun _ ↦ 1`.
The indicator function is implemented non-computably, to avoid having to pass around `Decidable`
arguments. This is in contrast with the design of `Pi.single` or `Set.piecewise`.
## Tags
indicator, characteristic
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open Function
variable {α β M N : Type*}
namespace Set
section One
variable [One M] [One N] {s t : Set α} {f g : α → M} {a : α}
/-- `Set.mulIndicator s f a` is `f a` if `a ∈ s`, `1` otherwise. -/
@[to_additive "`Set.indicator s f a` is `f a` if `a ∈ s`, `0` otherwise."]
noncomputable def mulIndicator (s : Set α) (f : α → M) (x : α) : M :=
haveI := Classical.decPred (· ∈ s)
if x ∈ s then f x else 1
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem piecewise_eq_mulIndicator [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] : s.piecewise f 1 = s.mulIndicator f :=
funext fun _ => @if_congr _ _ _ _ (id _) _ _ _ _ Iff.rfl rfl rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_apply (s : Set α) (f : α → M) (a : α) [Decidable (a ∈ s)] :
mulIndicator s f a = if a ∈ s then f a else 1 := by
unfold mulIndicator
congr
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) (f : α → M) : mulIndicator s f a = f a :=
if_pos h
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ s) (f : α → M) : mulIndicator s f a = 1 :=
if_neg h
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_eq_one_or_self (s : Set α) (f : α → M) (a : α) :
mulIndicator s f a = 1 ∨ mulIndicator s f a = f a := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· exact Or.inr (mulIndicator_of_mem h f)
· exact Or.inl (mulIndicator_of_not_mem h f)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_apply_eq_self : s.mulIndicator f a = f a ↔ a ∉ s → f a = 1 :=
letI := Classical.dec (a ∈ s)
ite_eq_left_iff.trans (by rw [@eq_comm _ (f a)])
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_eq_self : s.mulIndicator f = f ↔ mulSupport f ⊆ s := by
simp only [funext_iff, subset_def, mem_mulSupport, mulIndicator_apply_eq_self, not_imp_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_eq_self_of_superset (h1 : s.mulIndicator f = f) (h2 : s ⊆ t) :
t.mulIndicator f = f := by
rw [mulIndicator_eq_self] at h1 ⊢
exact Subset.trans h1 h2
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_apply_eq_one : mulIndicator s f a = 1 ↔ a ∈ s → f a = 1 :=
letI := Classical.dec (a ∈ s)
ite_eq_right_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_eq_one : (mulIndicator s f = fun _ => 1) ↔ Disjoint (mulSupport f) s := by
simp only [funext_iff, mulIndicator_apply_eq_one, Set.disjoint_left, mem_mulSupport,
not_imp_not]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulIndicator_eq_one' : mulIndicator s f = 1 ↔ Disjoint (mulSupport f) s :=
mulIndicator_eq_one
@[to_additive]
theorem mulIndicator_apply_ne_one {a : α} : s.mulIndicator f a ≠ 1 ↔ a ∈ s ∩ mulSupport f := by
simp only [Ne, mulIndicator_apply_eq_one, Classical.not_imp, mem_inter_iff, mem_mulSupport]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulSupport_mulIndicator :
Function.mulSupport (s.mulIndicator f) = s ∩ Function.mulSupport f :=
ext fun x => by simp [Function.mem_mulSupport, mulIndicator_apply_eq_one]
/-- If a multiplicative indicator function is not equal to `1` at a point, then that point is in the
set. -/
@[to_additive
"If an additive indicator function is not equal to `0` at a point, then that point is
| in the set."]
theorem mem_of_mulIndicator_ne_one (h : mulIndicator s f a ≠ 1) : a ∈ s :=
not_imp_comm.1 (fun hn => mulIndicator_of_not_mem hn f) h
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Indicator.lean | 118 | 120 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Order
import Mathlib.Data.Sym.Basic
/-!
# Equivalence between `Multiset` and `ℕ`-valued finitely supported functions
This defines `Finsupp.toMultiset` the equivalence between `α →₀ ℕ` and `Multiset α`, along
with `Multiset.toFinsupp` the reverse equivalence and `Finsupp.orderIsoMultiset` (the equivalence
promoted to an order isomorphism).
-/
open Finset
variable {α β ι : Type*}
namespace Finsupp
/-- Given `f : α →₀ ℕ`, `f.toMultiset` is the multiset with multiplicities given by the values of
`f` on the elements of `α`. We define this function as an `AddMonoidHom`.
Under the additional assumption of `[DecidableEq α]`, this is available as
`Multiset.toFinsupp : Multiset α ≃+ (α →₀ ℕ)`; the two declarations are separate as this assumption
is only needed for one direction. -/
def toMultiset : (α →₀ ℕ) →+ Multiset α where
toFun f := Finsupp.sum f fun a n => n • {a}
-- Porting note: have to specify `h` or add a `dsimp only` before `sum_add_index'`.
-- see also: https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12129
map_add' _f _g := sum_add_index' (h := fun _ n => n • _)
(fun _ ↦ zero_nsmul _) (fun _ ↦ add_nsmul _)
map_zero' := sum_zero_index
theorem toMultiset_zero : toMultiset (0 : α →₀ ℕ) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem toMultiset_add (m n : α →₀ ℕ) : toMultiset (m + n) = toMultiset m + toMultiset n :=
toMultiset.map_add m n
theorem toMultiset_apply (f : α →₀ ℕ) : toMultiset f = f.sum fun a n => n • {a} :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toMultiset_single (a : α) (n : ℕ) : toMultiset (single a n) = n • {a} := by
rw [toMultiset_apply, sum_single_index]; apply zero_nsmul
theorem toMultiset_sum {f : ι → α →₀ ℕ} (s : Finset ι) :
Finsupp.toMultiset (∑ i ∈ s, f i) = ∑ i ∈ s, Finsupp.toMultiset (f i) :=
map_sum Finsupp.toMultiset _ _
theorem toMultiset_sum_single (s : Finset ι) (n : ℕ) :
Finsupp.toMultiset (∑ i ∈ s, single i n) = n • s.val := by
simp_rw [toMultiset_sum, Finsupp.toMultiset_single, Finset.sum_nsmul, sum_multiset_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem card_toMultiset (f : α →₀ ℕ) : Multiset.card (toMultiset f) = f.sum fun _ => id := by
simp [toMultiset_apply, map_finsuppSum, Function.id_def]
theorem toMultiset_map (f : α →₀ ℕ) (g : α → β) :
f.toMultiset.map g = toMultiset (f.mapDomain g) := by
refine f.induction ?_ ?_
· rw [toMultiset_zero, Multiset.map_zero, mapDomain_zero, toMultiset_zero]
· intro a n f _ _ ih
rw [toMultiset_add, Multiset.map_add, ih, mapDomain_add, mapDomain_single,
toMultiset_single, toMultiset_add, toMultiset_single, ← Multiset.coe_mapAddMonoidHom,
(Multiset.mapAddMonoidHom g).map_nsmul]
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_toMultiset [CommMonoid α] (f : α →₀ ℕ) :
f.toMultiset.prod = f.prod fun a n => a ^ n := by
refine f.induction ?_ ?_
· rw [toMultiset_zero, Multiset.prod_zero, Finsupp.prod_zero_index]
· intro a n f _ _ ih
rw [toMultiset_add, Multiset.prod_add, ih, toMultiset_single, Multiset.prod_nsmul,
Finsupp.prod_add_index' pow_zero pow_add, Finsupp.prod_single_index, Multiset.prod_singleton]
exact pow_zero a
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_toMultiset [DecidableEq α] (f : α →₀ ℕ) : f.toMultiset.toFinset = f.support := by
refine f.induction ?_ ?_
· rw [toMultiset_zero, Multiset.toFinset_zero, support_zero]
· intro a n f ha hn ih
rw [toMultiset_add, Multiset.toFinset_add, ih, toMultiset_single, support_add_eq,
support_single_ne_zero _ hn, Multiset.toFinset_nsmul _ _ hn, Multiset.toFinset_singleton]
refine Disjoint.mono_left support_single_subset ?_
rwa [Finset.disjoint_singleton_left]
@[simp]
theorem count_toMultiset [DecidableEq α] (f : α →₀ ℕ) (a : α) : (toMultiset f).count a = f a :=
calc
(toMultiset f).count a = Finsupp.sum f (fun x n => (n • {x} : Multiset α).count a) := by
rw [toMultiset_apply]; exact map_sum (Multiset.countAddMonoidHom a) _ f.support
_ = f.sum fun x n => n * ({x} : Multiset α).count a := by simp only [Multiset.count_nsmul]
_ = f a * ({a} : Multiset α).count a :=
sum_eq_single _
(fun a' _ H => by simp only [Multiset.count_singleton, if_false, H.symm, mul_zero])
(fun _ => zero_mul _)
_ = f a := by rw [Multiset.count_singleton_self, mul_one]
theorem toMultiset_sup [DecidableEq α] (f g : α →₀ ℕ) :
toMultiset (f ⊔ g) = toMultiset f ∪ toMultiset g := by
ext
simp_rw [Multiset.count_union, Finsupp.count_toMultiset, Finsupp.sup_apply]
theorem toMultiset_inf [DecidableEq α] (f g : α →₀ ℕ) :
toMultiset (f ⊓ g) = toMultiset f ∩ toMultiset g := by
ext
simp_rw [Multiset.count_inter, Finsupp.count_toMultiset, Finsupp.inf_apply]
@[simp]
theorem mem_toMultiset (f : α →₀ ℕ) (i : α) : i ∈ toMultiset f ↔ i ∈ f.support := by
classical
rw [← Multiset.count_ne_zero, Finsupp.count_toMultiset, Finsupp.mem_support_iff]
end Finsupp
|
namespace Multiset
variable [DecidableEq α]
| Mathlib/Data/Finsupp/Multiset.lean | 122 | 125 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Chris Birkbeck. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Birkbeck
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.UpperHalfPlane.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.GeneralLinearGroup.Defs
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.SpecialLinearGroup
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
/-!
# Slash actions
This file defines a class of slash actions, which are families of right actions of a given group
parametrized by some Type. This is modeled on the slash action of `GLPos (Fin 2) ℝ` on the space
of modular forms.
## Notation
In the `ModularForm` locale, this provides
* `f ∣[k;γ] A`: the `k`th `γ`-compatible slash action by `A` on `f`
* `f ∣[k] A`: the `k`th `ℂ`-compatible slash action by `A` on `f`; a shorthand for `f ∣[k;ℂ] A`
-/
open Complex UpperHalfPlane ModularGroup
open scoped MatrixGroups
/-- A general version of the slash action of the space of modular forms. -/
class SlashAction (β G α γ : Type*) [Group G] [AddMonoid α] [SMul γ α] where
map : β → G → α → α
zero_slash : ∀ (k : β) (g : G), map k g 0 = 0
slash_one : ∀ (k : β) (a : α), map k 1 a = a
slash_mul : ∀ (k : β) (g h : G) (a : α), map k (g * h) a = map k h (map k g a)
smul_slash : ∀ (k : β) (g : G) (a : α) (z : γ), map k g (z • a) = z • map k g a
add_slash : ∀ (k : β) (g : G) (a b : α), map k g (a + b) = map k g a + map k g b
scoped[ModularForm] notation:100 f " ∣[" k ";" γ "] " a:100 => SlashAction.map γ k a f
scoped[ModularForm] notation:100 f " ∣[" k "] " a:100 => SlashAction.map ℂ k a f
open scoped ModularForm
@[simp]
theorem SlashAction.neg_slash {β G α γ : Type*} [Group G] [AddGroup α] [SMul γ α]
[SlashAction β G α γ] (k : β) (g : G) (a : α) : (-a) ∣[k;γ] g = -a ∣[k;γ] g :=
eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_left <| by
rw [← SlashAction.add_slash, neg_add_cancel, SlashAction.zero_slash]
@[simp]
theorem SlashAction.smul_slash_of_tower {R β G α : Type*} (γ : Type*) [Group G] [AddMonoid α]
[Monoid γ] [MulAction γ α] [SMul R γ] [SMul R α] [IsScalarTower R γ α] [SlashAction β G α γ]
(k : β) (g : G) (a : α) (r : R) : (r • a) ∣[k;γ] g = r • a ∣[k;γ] g := by
rw [← smul_one_smul γ r a, SlashAction.smul_slash, smul_one_smul]
attribute [simp] SlashAction.zero_slash SlashAction.slash_one SlashAction.smul_slash
SlashAction.add_slash
/-- Slash_action induced by a monoid homomorphism. -/
def monoidHomSlashAction {β G H α γ : Type*} [Group G] [AddMonoid α] [SMul γ α] [Group H]
[SlashAction β G α γ] (h : H →* G) : SlashAction β H α γ where
map k g := SlashAction.map γ k (h g)
zero_slash k g := SlashAction.zero_slash k (h g)
slash_one k a := by simp only [map_one, SlashAction.slash_one]
slash_mul k g gg a := by simp only [map_mul, SlashAction.slash_mul]
smul_slash _ _ := SlashAction.smul_slash _ _
add_slash _ g _ _ := SlashAction.add_slash _ (h g) _ _
namespace ModularForm
noncomputable section
/-- The weight `k` action of `GL(2, ℝ)⁺` on functions `f : ℍ → ℂ`. -/
def slash (k : ℤ) (γ : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (f : ℍ → ℂ) (x : ℍ) : ℂ :=
f (γ • x) * (↑(↑ₘ[ℝ] γ).det : ℂ) ^ (k - 1) * UpperHalfPlane.denom γ x ^ (-k)
variable {k : ℤ} (f : ℍ → ℂ)
section
-- temporary notation until the instance is built
local notation:100 f " ∣[" k "]" γ:100 => ModularForm.slash k γ f
private theorem slash_mul (k : ℤ) (A B : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (f : ℍ → ℂ) :
f ∣[k] (A * B) = (f ∣[k] A) ∣[k] B := by
ext1 x
simp only [slash, UpperHalfPlane.denom_cocycle A B x]
simp only [mul_smul, Subgroup.coe_mul, Units.val_mul, Matrix.det_mul, ofReal_mul, denom, smulAux,
smulAux', num, coe_mk, UpperHalfPlane.coe_smul]
rw [mul_zpow, mul_right_comm _ _ (((↑ₘ[ℝ] B).det : ℂ) ^ (k - 1)),
← mul_assoc, mul_zpow, ← mul_assoc]
private theorem add_slash (k : ℤ) (A : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (f g : ℍ → ℂ) :
(f + g) ∣[k]A = f ∣[k]A + g ∣[k]A := by
ext1
simp only [slash, Pi.add_apply, denom, zpow_neg]
ring
private theorem slash_one (k : ℤ) (f : ℍ → ℂ) : f ∣[k]1 = f :=
funext <| by simp [slash, denom]
variable {α : Type*} [SMul α ℂ] [IsScalarTower α ℂ ℂ]
private theorem smul_slash (k : ℤ) (A : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) (f : ℍ → ℂ) (c : α) :
(c • f) ∣[k]A = c • f ∣[k]A := by
simp_rw [← smul_one_smul ℂ c f, ← smul_one_smul ℂ c (f ∣[k]A)]
ext1
simp_rw [slash]
simp only [slash, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, Matrix.GeneralLinearGroup.val_det_apply, Pi.smul_apply]
ring
private theorem zero_slash (k : ℤ) (A : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) : (0 : ℍ → ℂ) ∣[k]A = 0 :=
funext fun _ => by simp only [slash, Pi.zero_apply, zero_mul]
instance : SlashAction ℤ GL(2, ℝ)⁺ (ℍ → ℂ) ℂ where
map := slash
zero_slash := zero_slash
slash_one := slash_one
slash_mul := slash_mul
smul_slash := smul_slash
add_slash := add_slash
|
end
theorem slash_def (A : GL(2, ℝ)⁺) : f ∣[k] A = slash k A f :=
rfl
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/ModularForms/SlashActions.lean | 124 | 128 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Aurélien Saue, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Inv
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Pow
import Mathlib.Util.AtomM
/-!
# `ring` tactic
A tactic for solving equations in commutative (semi)rings,
where the exponents can also contain variables.
Based on <http://www.cs.ru.nl/~freek/courses/tt-2014/read/10.1.1.61.3041.pdf> .
More precisely, expressions of the following form are supported:
- constants (non-negative integers)
- variables
- coefficients (any rational number, embedded into the (semi)ring)
- addition of expressions
- multiplication of expressions (`a * b`)
- scalar multiplication of expressions (`n • a`; the multiplier must have type `ℕ`)
- exponentiation of expressions (the exponent must have type `ℕ`)
- subtraction and negation of expressions (if the base is a full ring)
The extension to exponents means that something like `2 * 2^n * b = b * 2^(n+1)` can be proved,
even though it is not strictly speaking an equation in the language of commutative rings.
## Implementation notes
The basic approach to prove equalities is to normalise both sides and check for equality.
The normalisation is guided by building a value in the type `ExSum` at the meta level,
together with a proof (at the base level) that the original value is equal to
the normalised version.
The outline of the file:
- Define a mutual inductive family of types `ExSum`, `ExProd`, `ExBase`,
which can represent expressions with `+`, `*`, `^` and rational numerals.
The mutual induction ensures that associativity and distributivity are applied,
by restricting which kinds of subexpressions appear as arguments to the various operators.
- Represent addition, multiplication and exponentiation in the `ExSum` type,
thus allowing us to map expressions to `ExSum` (the `eval` function drives this).
We apply associativity and distributivity of the operators here (helped by `Ex*` types)
and commutativity as well (by sorting the subterms; unfortunately not helped by anything).
Any expression not of the above formats is treated as an atom (the same as a variable).
There are some details we glossed over which make the plan more complicated:
- The order on atoms is not initially obvious.
We construct a list containing them in order of initial appearance in the expression,
then use the index into the list as a key to order on.
- For `pow`, the exponent must be a natural number, while the base can be any semiring `α`.
We swap out operations for the base ring `α` with those for the exponent ring `ℕ`
as soon as we deal with exponents.
## Caveats and future work
The normalized form of an expression is the one that is useful for the tactic,
but not as nice to read. To remedy this, the user-facing normalization calls `ringNFCore`.
Subtraction cancels out identical terms, but division does not.
That is: `a - a = 0 := by ring` solves the goal,
but `a / a := 1 by ring` doesn't.
Note that `0 / 0` is generally defined to be `0`,
so division cancelling out is not true in general.
Multiplication of powers can be simplified a little bit further:
`2 ^ n * 2 ^ n = 4 ^ n := by ring` could be implemented
in a similar way that `2 * a + 2 * a = 4 * a := by ring` already works.
This feature wasn't needed yet, so it's not implemented yet.
## Tags
ring, semiring, exponent, power
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedAddCommMonoid
namespace Mathlib.Tactic
namespace Ring
open Mathlib.Meta Qq NormNum Lean.Meta AtomM
attribute [local instance] monadLiftOptionMetaM
open Lean (MetaM Expr mkRawNatLit)
/-- A shortcut instance for `CommSemiring ℕ` used by ring. -/
def instCommSemiringNat : CommSemiring ℕ := inferInstance
/--
A typed expression of type `CommSemiring ℕ` used when we are working on
ring subexpressions of type `ℕ`.
-/
def sℕ : Q(CommSemiring ℕ) := q(instCommSemiringNat)
mutual
/-- The base `e` of a normalized exponent expression. -/
inductive ExBase : ∀ {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)}, Q(CommSemiring $α) → (e : Q($α)) → Type
/--
An atomic expression `e` with id `id`.
Atomic expressions are those which `ring` cannot parse any further.
For instance, `a + (a % b)` has `a` and `(a % b)` as atoms.
The `ring1` tactic does not normalize the subexpressions in atoms, but `ring_nf` does.
Atoms in fact represent equivalence classes of expressions, modulo definitional equality.
The field `index : ℕ` should be a unique number for each class,
while `value : expr` contains a representative of this class.
The function `resolve_atom` determines the appropriate atom for a given expression.
-/
| atom {sα} {e} (id : ℕ) : ExBase sα e
/-- A sum of monomials. -/
| sum {sα} {e} (_ : ExSum sα e) : ExBase sα e
/--
A monomial, which is a product of powers of `ExBase` expressions,
terminated by a (nonzero) constant coefficient.
-/
inductive ExProd : ∀ {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)}, Q(CommSemiring $α) → (e : Q($α)) → Type
/-- A coefficient `value`, which must not be `0`. `e` is a raw rat cast.
If `value` is not an integer, then `hyp` should be a proof of `(value.den : α) ≠ 0`. -/
| const {sα} {e} (value : ℚ) (hyp : Option Expr := none) : ExProd sα e
/-- A product `x ^ e * b` is a monomial if `b` is a monomial. Here `x` is an `ExBase`
and `e` is an `ExProd` representing a monomial expression in `ℕ` (it is a monomial instead of
a polynomial because we eagerly normalize `x ^ (a + b) = x ^ a * x ^ b`.) -/
| mul {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα} {x : Q($α)} {e : Q(ℕ)} {b : Q($α)} :
ExBase sα x → ExProd sℕ e → ExProd sα b → ExProd sα q($x ^ $e * $b)
/-- A polynomial expression, which is a sum of monomials. -/
inductive ExSum : ∀ {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)}, Q(CommSemiring $α) → (e : Q($α)) → Type
/-- Zero is a polynomial. `e` is the expression `0`. -/
| zero {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} : ExSum sα q(0 : $α)
/-- A sum `a + b` is a polynomial if `a` is a monomial and `b` is another polynomial. -/
| add {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExProd sα a → ExSum sα b → ExSum sα q($a + $b)
end
mutual -- partial only to speed up compilation
/-- Equality test for expressions. This is not a `BEq` instance because it is heterogeneous. -/
partial def ExBase.eq
{u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExBase sα a → ExBase sα b → Bool
| .atom i, .atom j => i == j
| .sum a, .sum b => a.eq b
| _, _ => false
@[inherit_doc ExBase.eq]
partial def ExProd.eq
{u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExProd sα a → ExProd sα b → Bool
| .const i _, .const j _ => i == j
| .mul a₁ a₂ a₃, .mul b₁ b₂ b₃ => a₁.eq b₁ && a₂.eq b₂ && a₃.eq b₃
| _, _ => false
@[inherit_doc ExBase.eq]
partial def ExSum.eq
{u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExSum sα a → ExSum sα b → Bool
| .zero, .zero => true
| .add a₁ a₂, .add b₁ b₂ => a₁.eq b₁ && a₂.eq b₂
| _, _ => false
end
mutual -- partial only to speed up compilation
/--
A total order on normalized expressions.
This is not an `Ord` instance because it is heterogeneous.
-/
partial def ExBase.cmp
{u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExBase sα a → ExBase sα b → Ordering
| .atom i, .atom j => compare i j
| .sum a, .sum b => a.cmp b
| .atom .., .sum .. => .lt
| .sum .., .atom .. => .gt
@[inherit_doc ExBase.cmp]
partial def ExProd.cmp
{u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExProd sα a → ExProd sα b → Ordering
| .const i _, .const j _ => compare i j
| .mul a₁ a₂ a₃, .mul b₁ b₂ b₃ => (a₁.cmp b₁).then (a₂.cmp b₂) |>.then (a₃.cmp b₃)
| .const _ _, .mul .. => .lt
| .mul .., .const _ _ => .gt
@[inherit_doc ExBase.cmp]
partial def ExSum.cmp
{u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExSum sα a → ExSum sα b → Ordering
| .zero, .zero => .eq
| .add a₁ a₂, .add b₁ b₂ => (a₁.cmp b₁).then (a₂.cmp b₂)
| .zero, .add .. => .lt
| .add .., .zero => .gt
end
variable {u : Lean.Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)}
instance : Inhabited (Σ e, (ExBase sα) e) := ⟨default, .atom 0⟩
instance : Inhabited (Σ e, (ExSum sα) e) := ⟨_, .zero⟩
instance : Inhabited (Σ e, (ExProd sα) e) := ⟨default, .const 0 none⟩
mutual
/-- Converts `ExBase sα` to `ExBase sβ`, assuming `sα` and `sβ` are defeq. -/
partial def ExBase.cast
{v : Lean.Level} {β : Q(Type v)} {sβ : Q(CommSemiring $β)} {a : Q($α)} :
ExBase sα a → Σ a, ExBase sβ a
| .atom i => ⟨a, .atom i⟩
| .sum a => let ⟨_, vb⟩ := a.cast; ⟨_, .sum vb⟩
/-- Converts `ExProd sα` to `ExProd sβ`, assuming `sα` and `sβ` are defeq. -/
partial def ExProd.cast
{v : Lean.Level} {β : Q(Type v)} {sβ : Q(CommSemiring $β)} {a : Q($α)} :
ExProd sα a → Σ a, ExProd sβ a
| .const i h => ⟨a, .const i h⟩
| .mul a₁ a₂ a₃ => ⟨_, .mul a₁.cast.2 a₂ a₃.cast.2⟩
/-- Converts `ExSum sα` to `ExSum sβ`, assuming `sα` and `sβ` are defeq. -/
partial def ExSum.cast
{v : Lean.Level} {β : Q(Type v)} {sβ : Q(CommSemiring $β)} {a : Q($α)} :
ExSum sα a → Σ a, ExSum sβ a
| .zero => ⟨_, .zero⟩
| .add a₁ a₂ => ⟨_, .add a₁.cast.2 a₂.cast.2⟩
end
variable {u : Lean.Level}
/--
The result of evaluating an (unnormalized) expression `e` into the type family `E`
(one of `ExSum`, `ExProd`, `ExBase`) is a (normalized) element `e'`
and a representation `E e'` for it, and a proof of `e = e'`.
-/
structure Result {α : Q(Type u)} (E : Q($α) → Type) (e : Q($α)) where
/-- The normalized result. -/
expr : Q($α)
/-- The data associated to the normalization. -/
val : E expr
/-- A proof that the original expression is equal to the normalized result. -/
proof : Q($e = $expr)
instance {α : Q(Type u)} {E : Q($α) → Type} {e : Q($α)} [Inhabited (Σ e, E e)] :
Inhabited (Result E e) :=
let ⟨e', v⟩ : Σ e, E e := default; ⟨e', v, default⟩
variable {α : Q(Type u)} (sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)) {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
/--
Constructs the expression corresponding to `.const n`.
(The `.const` constructor does not check that the expression is correct.)
-/
def ExProd.mkNat (n : ℕ) : (e : Q($α)) × ExProd sα e :=
let lit : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit n
⟨q(($lit).rawCast : $α), .const n none⟩
/--
Constructs the expression corresponding to `.const (-n)`.
(The `.const` constructor does not check that the expression is correct.)
-/
def ExProd.mkNegNat (_ : Q(Ring $α)) (n : ℕ) : (e : Q($α)) × ExProd sα e :=
let lit : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit n
⟨q((Int.negOfNat $lit).rawCast : $α), .const (-n) none⟩
/--
Constructs the expression corresponding to `.const q h` for `q = n / d`
and `h` a proof that `(d : α) ≠ 0`.
(The `.const` constructor does not check that the expression is correct.)
-/
def ExProd.mkRat (_ : Q(DivisionRing $α)) (q : ℚ) (n : Q(ℤ)) (d : Q(ℕ)) (h : Expr) :
(e : Q($α)) × ExProd sα e :=
⟨q(Rat.rawCast $n $d : $α), .const q h⟩
section
/-- Embed an exponent (an `ExBase, ExProd` pair) as an `ExProd` by multiplying by 1. -/
def ExBase.toProd {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a : Q($α)} {b : Q(ℕ)}
(va : ExBase sα a) (vb : ExProd sℕ b) :
ExProd sα q($a ^ $b * (nat_lit 1).rawCast) := .mul va vb (.const 1 none)
/-- Embed `ExProd` in `ExSum` by adding 0. -/
def ExProd.toSum {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {e : Q($α)} (v : ExProd sα e) : ExSum sα q($e + 0) :=
.add v .zero
/-- Get the leading coefficient of an `ExProd`. -/
def ExProd.coeff {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {e : Q($α)} : ExProd sα e → ℚ
| .const q _ => q
| .mul _ _ v => v.coeff
end
/--
Two monomials are said to "overlap" if they differ by a constant factor, in which case the
constants just add. When this happens, the constant may be either zero (if the monomials cancel)
or nonzero (if they add up); the zero case is handled specially.
-/
inductive Overlap (e : Q($α)) where
/-- The expression `e` (the sum of monomials) is equal to `0`. -/
| zero (_ : Q(IsNat $e (nat_lit 0)))
/-- The expression `e` (the sum of monomials) is equal to another monomial
(with nonzero leading coefficient). -/
| nonzero (_ : Result (ExProd sα) e)
variable {a a' a₁ a₂ a₃ b b' b₁ b₂ b₃ c c₁ c₂ : R}
theorem add_overlap_pf (x : R) (e) (pq_pf : a + b = c) :
x ^ e * a + x ^ e * b = x ^ e * c := by subst_vars; simp [mul_add]
theorem add_overlap_pf_zero (x : R) (e) :
IsNat (a + b) (nat_lit 0) → IsNat (x ^ e * a + x ^ e * b) (nat_lit 0)
| ⟨h⟩ => ⟨by simp [h, ← mul_add]⟩
-- TODO: decide if this is a good idea globally in
-- https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/270676-lean4/topic/.60MonadLift.20Option.20.28OptionT.20m.29.60/near/469097834
private local instance {m} [Pure m] : MonadLift Option (OptionT m) where
monadLift f := .mk <| pure f
/--
Given monomials `va, vb`, attempts to add them together to get another monomial.
If the monomials are not compatible, returns `none`.
For example, `xy + 2xy = 3xy` is a `.nonzero` overlap, while `xy + xz` returns `none`
and `xy + -xy = 0` is a `.zero` overlap.
-/
def evalAddOverlap {a b : Q($α)} (va : ExProd sα a) (vb : ExProd sα b) :
OptionT Lean.Core.CoreM (Overlap sα q($a + $b)) := do
Lean.Core.checkSystem decl_name%.toString
match va, vb with
| .const za ha, .const zb hb => do
let ra := Result.ofRawRat za a ha; let rb := Result.ofRawRat zb b hb
let res ← NormNum.evalAdd.core q($a + $b) q(HAdd.hAdd) a b ra rb
match res with
| .isNat _ (.lit (.natVal 0)) p => pure <| .zero p
| rc =>
let ⟨zc, hc⟩ ← rc.toRatNZ
let ⟨c, pc⟩ := rc.toRawEq
pure <| .nonzero ⟨c, .const zc hc, pc⟩
| .mul (x := a₁) (e := a₂) va₁ va₂ va₃, .mul vb₁ vb₂ vb₃ => do
guard (va₁.eq vb₁ && va₂.eq vb₂)
match ← evalAddOverlap va₃ vb₃ with
| .zero p => pure <| .zero (q(add_overlap_pf_zero $a₁ $a₂ $p) : Expr)
| .nonzero ⟨_, vc, p⟩ =>
pure <| .nonzero ⟨_, .mul va₁ va₂ vc, (q(add_overlap_pf $a₁ $a₂ $p) : Expr)⟩
| _, _ => OptionT.fail
theorem add_pf_zero_add (b : R) : 0 + b = b := by simp
theorem add_pf_add_zero (a : R) : a + 0 = a := by simp
theorem add_pf_add_overlap
(_ : a₁ + b₁ = c₁) (_ : a₂ + b₂ = c₂) : (a₁ + a₂ : R) + (b₁ + b₂) = c₁ + c₂ := by
subst_vars; simp [add_assoc, add_left_comm]
theorem add_pf_add_overlap_zero
(h : IsNat (a₁ + b₁) (nat_lit 0)) (h₄ : a₂ + b₂ = c) : (a₁ + a₂ : R) + (b₁ + b₂) = c := by
subst_vars; rw [add_add_add_comm, h.1, Nat.cast_zero, add_pf_zero_add]
theorem add_pf_add_lt (a₁ : R) (_ : a₂ + b = c) : (a₁ + a₂) + b = a₁ + c := by simp [*, add_assoc]
theorem add_pf_add_gt (b₁ : R) (_ : a + b₂ = c) : a + (b₁ + b₂) = b₁ + c := by
subst_vars; simp [add_left_comm]
/-- Adds two polynomials `va, vb` together to get a normalized result polynomial.
* `0 + b = b`
* `a + 0 = a`
* `a * x + a * y = a * (x + y)` (for `x`, `y` coefficients; uses `evalAddOverlap`)
* `(a₁ + a₂) + (b₁ + b₂) = a₁ + (a₂ + (b₁ + b₂))` (if `a₁.lt b₁`)
* `(a₁ + a₂) + (b₁ + b₂) = b₁ + ((a₁ + a₂) + b₂)` (if not `a₁.lt b₁`)
-/
partial def evalAdd {a b : Q($α)} (va : ExSum sα a) (vb : ExSum sα b) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExSum sα) q($a + $b) := do
Lean.Core.checkSystem decl_name%.toString
match va, vb with
| .zero, vb => return ⟨b, vb, q(add_pf_zero_add $b)⟩
| va, .zero => return ⟨a, va, q(add_pf_add_zero $a)⟩
| .add (a := a₁) (b := _a₂) va₁ va₂, .add (a := b₁) (b := _b₂) vb₁ vb₂ =>
match ← (evalAddOverlap sα va₁ vb₁).run with
| some (.nonzero ⟨_, vc₁, pc₁⟩) =>
let ⟨_, vc₂, pc₂⟩ ← evalAdd va₂ vb₂
return ⟨_, .add vc₁ vc₂, q(add_pf_add_overlap $pc₁ $pc₂)⟩
| some (.zero pc₁) =>
let ⟨c₂, vc₂, pc₂⟩ ← evalAdd va₂ vb₂
return ⟨c₂, vc₂, q(add_pf_add_overlap_zero $pc₁ $pc₂)⟩
| none =>
if let .lt := va₁.cmp vb₁ then
let ⟨_c, vc, (pc : Q($_a₂ + ($b₁ + $_b₂) = $_c))⟩ ← evalAdd va₂ vb
return ⟨_, .add va₁ vc, q(add_pf_add_lt $a₁ $pc)⟩
else
let ⟨_c, vc, (pc : Q($a₁ + $_a₂ + $_b₂ = $_c))⟩ ← evalAdd va vb₂
return ⟨_, .add vb₁ vc, q(add_pf_add_gt $b₁ $pc)⟩
theorem one_mul (a : R) : (nat_lit 1).rawCast * a = a := by simp [Nat.rawCast]
theorem mul_one (a : R) : a * (nat_lit 1).rawCast = a := by simp [Nat.rawCast]
theorem mul_pf_left (a₁ : R) (a₂) (_ : a₃ * b = c) :
(a₁ ^ a₂ * a₃ : R) * b = a₁ ^ a₂ * c := by
subst_vars; rw [mul_assoc]
theorem mul_pf_right (b₁ : R) (b₂) (_ : a * b₃ = c) :
a * (b₁ ^ b₂ * b₃) = b₁ ^ b₂ * c := by
subst_vars; rw [mul_left_comm]
theorem mul_pp_pf_overlap {ea eb e : ℕ} (x : R) (_ : ea + eb = e) (_ : a₂ * b₂ = c) :
(x ^ ea * a₂ : R) * (x ^ eb * b₂) = x ^ e * c := by
subst_vars; simp [pow_add, mul_mul_mul_comm]
/-- Multiplies two monomials `va, vb` together to get a normalized result monomial.
* `x * y = (x * y)` (for `x`, `y` coefficients)
* `x * (b₁ * b₂) = b₁ * (b₂ * x)` (for `x` coefficient)
* `(a₁ * a₂) * y = a₁ * (a₂ * y)` (for `y` coefficient)
* `(x ^ ea * a₂) * (x ^ eb * b₂) = x ^ (ea + eb) * (a₂ * b₂)`
(if `ea` and `eb` are identical except coefficient)
* `(a₁ * a₂) * (b₁ * b₂) = a₁ * (a₂ * (b₁ * b₂))` (if `a₁.lt b₁`)
* `(a₁ * a₂) * (b₁ * b₂) = b₁ * ((a₁ * a₂) * b₂)` (if not `a₁.lt b₁`)
-/
partial def evalMulProd {a b : Q($α)} (va : ExProd sα a) (vb : ExProd sα b) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExProd sα) q($a * $b) := do
Lean.Core.checkSystem decl_name%.toString
match va, vb with
| .const za ha, .const zb hb =>
if za = 1 then
return ⟨b, .const zb hb, (q(one_mul $b) : Expr)⟩
else if zb = 1 then
return ⟨a, .const za ha, (q(mul_one $a) : Expr)⟩
else
let ra := Result.ofRawRat za a ha; let rb := Result.ofRawRat zb b hb
let rc := (NormNum.evalMul.core q($a * $b) q(HMul.hMul) _ _
q(CommSemiring.toSemiring) ra rb).get!
let ⟨zc, hc⟩ := rc.toRatNZ.get!
let ⟨c, pc⟩ := rc.toRawEq
return ⟨c, .const zc hc, pc⟩
| .mul (x := a₁) (e := a₂) va₁ va₂ va₃, .const _ _ =>
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalMulProd va₃ vb
return ⟨_, .mul va₁ va₂ vc, (q(mul_pf_left $a₁ $a₂ $pc) : Expr)⟩
| .const _ _, .mul (x := b₁) (e := b₂) vb₁ vb₂ vb₃ =>
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalMulProd va vb₃
return ⟨_, .mul vb₁ vb₂ vc, (q(mul_pf_right $b₁ $b₂ $pc) : Expr)⟩
| .mul (x := xa) (e := ea) vxa vea va₂, .mul (x := xb) (e := eb) vxb veb vb₂ => do
if vxa.eq vxb then
if let some (.nonzero ⟨_, ve, pe⟩) ← (evalAddOverlap sℕ vea veb).run then
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalMulProd va₂ vb₂
return ⟨_, .mul vxa ve vc, (q(mul_pp_pf_overlap $xa $pe $pc) : Expr)⟩
if let .lt := (vxa.cmp vxb).then (vea.cmp veb) then
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalMulProd va₂ vb
return ⟨_, .mul vxa vea vc, (q(mul_pf_left $xa $ea $pc) : Expr)⟩
else
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ ← evalMulProd va vb₂
return ⟨_, .mul vxb veb vc, (q(mul_pf_right $xb $eb $pc) : Expr)⟩
theorem mul_zero (a : R) : a * 0 = 0 := by simp
theorem mul_add {d : R} (_ : (a : R) * b₁ = c₁) (_ : a * b₂ = c₂) (_ : c₁ + 0 + c₂ = d) :
a * (b₁ + b₂) = d := by
subst_vars; simp [_root_.mul_add]
/-- Multiplies a monomial `va` to a polynomial `vb` to get a normalized result polynomial.
* `a * 0 = 0`
* `a * (b₁ + b₂) = (a * b₁) + (a * b₂)`
-/
def evalMul₁ {a b : Q($α)} (va : ExProd sα a) (vb : ExSum sα b) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExSum sα) q($a * $b) := do
match vb with
| .zero => return ⟨_, .zero, q(mul_zero $a)⟩
| .add vb₁ vb₂ =>
let ⟨_, vc₁, pc₁⟩ ← evalMulProd sα va vb₁
let ⟨_, vc₂, pc₂⟩ ← evalMul₁ va vb₂
let ⟨_, vd, pd⟩ ← evalAdd sα vc₁.toSum vc₂
return ⟨_, vd, q(mul_add $pc₁ $pc₂ $pd)⟩
theorem zero_mul (b : R) : 0 * b = 0 := by simp
theorem add_mul {d : R} (_ : (a₁ : R) * b = c₁) (_ : a₂ * b = c₂) (_ : c₁ + c₂ = d) :
(a₁ + a₂) * b = d := by subst_vars; simp [_root_.add_mul]
/-- Multiplies two polynomials `va, vb` together to get a normalized result polynomial.
* `0 * b = 0`
* `(a₁ + a₂) * b = (a₁ * b) + (a₂ * b)`
-/
def evalMul {a b : Q($α)} (va : ExSum sα a) (vb : ExSum sα b) :
Lean.Core.CoreM <| Result (ExSum sα) q($a * $b) := do
match va with
| .zero => return ⟨_, .zero, q(zero_mul $b)⟩
| .add va₁ va₂ =>
let ⟨_, vc₁, pc₁⟩ ← evalMul₁ sα va₁ vb
let ⟨_, vc₂, pc₂⟩ ← evalMul va₂ vb
let ⟨_, vd, pd⟩ ← evalAdd sα vc₁ vc₂
return ⟨_, vd, q(add_mul $pc₁ $pc₂ $pd)⟩
theorem natCast_nat (n) : ((Nat.rawCast n : ℕ) : R) = Nat.rawCast n := by simp
theorem natCast_mul {a₁ a₃ : ℕ} (a₂) (_ : ((a₁ : ℕ) : R) = b₁)
(_ : ((a₃ : ℕ) : R) = b₃) : ((a₁ ^ a₂ * a₃ : ℕ) : R) = b₁ ^ a₂ * b₃ := by
subst_vars; simp
theorem natCast_zero : ((0 : ℕ) : R) = 0 := Nat.cast_zero
theorem natCast_add {a₁ a₂ : ℕ}
(_ : ((a₁ : ℕ) : R) = b₁) (_ : ((a₂ : ℕ) : R) = b₂) : ((a₁ + a₂ : ℕ) : R) = b₁ + b₂ := by
subst_vars; simp
mutual
/-- Applies `Nat.cast` to a nat polynomial to produce a polynomial in `α`.
* An atom `e` causes `↑e` to be allocated as a new atom.
* A sum delegates to `ExSum.evalNatCast`.
-/
partial def ExBase.evalNatCast {a : Q(ℕ)} (va : ExBase sℕ a) : AtomM (Result (ExBase sα) q($a)) :=
match va with
| .atom _ => do
let (i, ⟨b', _⟩) ← addAtomQ q($a)
pure ⟨b', ExBase.atom i, q(Eq.refl $b')⟩
| .sum va => do
let ⟨_, vc, p⟩ ← va.evalNatCast
pure ⟨_, .sum vc, p⟩
/-- Applies `Nat.cast` to a nat monomial to produce a monomial in `α`.
* `↑c = c` if `c` is a numeric literal
* `↑(a ^ n * b) = ↑a ^ n * ↑b`
-/
partial def ExProd.evalNatCast {a : Q(ℕ)} (va : ExProd sℕ a) : AtomM (Result (ExProd sα) q($a)) :=
match va with
| .const c hc =>
have n : Q(ℕ) := a.appArg!
pure ⟨q(Nat.rawCast $n), .const c hc, (q(natCast_nat (R := $α) $n) : Expr)⟩
| .mul (e := a₂) va₁ va₂ va₃ => do
let ⟨_, vb₁, pb₁⟩ ← va₁.evalNatCast
let ⟨_, vb₃, pb₃⟩ ← va₃.evalNatCast
pure ⟨_, .mul vb₁ va₂ vb₃, q(natCast_mul $a₂ $pb₁ $pb₃)⟩
/-- Applies `Nat.cast` to a nat polynomial to produce a polynomial in `α`.
* `↑0 = 0`
* `↑(a + b) = ↑a + ↑b`
-/
partial def ExSum.evalNatCast {a : Q(ℕ)} (va : ExSum sℕ a) : AtomM (Result (ExSum sα) q($a)) :=
match va with
| .zero => pure ⟨_, .zero, q(natCast_zero (R := $α))⟩
| .add va₁ va₂ => do
let ⟨_, vb₁, pb₁⟩ ← va₁.evalNatCast
let ⟨_, vb₂, pb₂⟩ ← va₂.evalNatCast
pure ⟨_, .add vb₁ vb₂, q(natCast_add $pb₁ $pb₂)⟩
end
theorem smul_nat {a b c : ℕ} (_ : (a * b : ℕ) = c) : a • b = c := by subst_vars; simp
theorem smul_eq_cast {a : ℕ} (_ : ((a : ℕ) : R) = a') (_ : a' * b = c) : a • b = c := by
subst_vars; simp
/-- Constructs the scalar multiplication `n • a`, where both `n : ℕ` and `a : α` are normalized
| polynomial expressions.
| Mathlib/Tactic/Ring/Basic.lean | 558 | 559 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.WittVector.InitTail
/-!
# Truncated Witt vectors
The ring of truncated Witt vectors (of length `n`) is a quotient of the ring of Witt vectors.
It retains the first `n` coefficients of each Witt vector.
In this file, we set up the basic quotient API for this ring.
The ring of Witt vectors is the projective limit of all the rings of truncated Witt vectors.
## Main declarations
- `TruncatedWittVector`: the underlying type of the ring of truncated Witt vectors
- `TruncatedWittVector.instCommRing`: the ring structure on truncated Witt vectors
- `WittVector.truncate`: the quotient homomorphism that truncates a Witt vector,
to obtain a truncated Witt vector
- `TruncatedWittVector.truncate`: the homomorphism that truncates
a truncated Witt vector of length `n` to one of length `m` (for some `m ≤ n`)
- `WittVector.lift`: the unique ring homomorphism into the ring of Witt vectors
that is compatible with a family of ring homomorphisms to the truncated Witt vectors:
this realizes the ring of Witt vectors as projective limit of the rings of truncated Witt vectors
## References
* [Hazewinkel, *Witt Vectors*][Haze09]
* [Commelin and Lewis, *Formalizing the Ring of Witt Vectors*][CL21]
-/
open Function (Injective Surjective)
noncomputable section
variable {p : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (R : Type*)
local notation "𝕎" => WittVector p -- type as `\bbW`
/-- A truncated Witt vector over `R` is a vector of elements of `R`,
i.e., the first `n` coefficients of a Witt vector.
We will define operations on this type that are compatible with the (untruncated) Witt
vector operations.
`TruncatedWittVector p n R` takes a parameter `p : ℕ` that is not used in the definition.
In practice, this number `p` is assumed to be a prime number,
and under this assumption we construct a ring structure on `TruncatedWittVector p n R`.
(`TruncatedWittVector p₁ n R` and `TruncatedWittVector p₂ n R` are definitionally
equal as types but will have different ring operations.)
-/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def TruncatedWittVector (_ : ℕ) (n : ℕ) (R : Type*) :=
Fin n → R
instance (p n : ℕ) (R : Type*) [Inhabited R] : Inhabited (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨fun _ => default⟩
variable {n R}
namespace TruncatedWittVector
variable (p) in
/-- Create a `TruncatedWittVector` from a vector `x`. -/
def mk (x : Fin n → R) : TruncatedWittVector p n R :=
x
/-- `x.coeff i` is the `i`th entry of `x`. -/
def coeff (i : Fin n) (x : TruncatedWittVector p n R) : R :=
x i
@[ext]
theorem ext {x y : TruncatedWittVector p n R} (h : ∀ i, x.coeff i = y.coeff i) : x = y :=
funext h
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mk (x : Fin n → R) (i : Fin n) : (mk p x).coeff i = x i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_coeff (x : TruncatedWittVector p n R) : (mk p fun i => x.coeff i) = x := by
ext i; rw [coeff_mk]
variable [CommRing R]
/-- We can turn a truncated Witt vector `x` into a Witt vector
by setting all coefficients after `x` to be 0.
-/
def out (x : TruncatedWittVector p n R) : 𝕎 R :=
@WittVector.mk' p _ fun i => if h : i < n then x.coeff ⟨i, h⟩ else 0
@[simp]
theorem coeff_out (x : TruncatedWittVector p n R) (i : Fin n) : x.out.coeff i = x.coeff i := by
rw [out]; dsimp only; rw [dif_pos i.is_lt, Fin.eta]
theorem out_injective : Injective (@out p n R _) := by
intro x y h
ext i
rw [WittVector.ext_iff] at h
simpa only [coeff_out] using h ↑i
end TruncatedWittVector
namespace WittVector
variable (n)
section
/-- `truncateFun n x` uses the first `n` entries of `x` to construct a `TruncatedWittVector`,
which has the same base `p` as `x`.
This function is bundled into a ring homomorphism in `WittVector.truncate` -/
def truncateFun (x : 𝕎 R) : TruncatedWittVector p n R :=
TruncatedWittVector.mk p fun i => x.coeff i
end
variable {n}
@[simp]
theorem coeff_truncateFun (x : 𝕎 R) (i : Fin n) : (truncateFun n x).coeff i = x.coeff i := by
rw [truncateFun, TruncatedWittVector.coeff_mk]
variable [CommRing R]
@[simp]
theorem out_truncateFun (x : 𝕎 R) : (truncateFun n x).out = init n x := by
ext i
dsimp [TruncatedWittVector.out, init, select, coeff_mk]
split_ifs with hi; swap; · rfl
rw [coeff_truncateFun, Fin.val_mk]
end WittVector
namespace TruncatedWittVector
variable [CommRing R]
@[simp]
theorem truncateFun_out (x : TruncatedWittVector p n R) : x.out.truncateFun n = x := by
simp only [WittVector.truncateFun, coeff_out, mk_coeff]
open WittVector
variable (p n R)
variable [Fact p.Prime]
instance : Zero (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨truncateFun n 0⟩
instance : One (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨truncateFun n 1⟩
instance : NatCast (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨fun i => truncateFun n i⟩
instance : IntCast (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨fun i => truncateFun n i⟩
instance : Add (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨fun x y => truncateFun n (x.out + y.out)⟩
instance : Mul (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨fun x y => truncateFun n (x.out * y.out)⟩
instance : Neg (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨fun x => truncateFun n (-x.out)⟩
instance : Sub (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨fun x y => truncateFun n (x.out - y.out)⟩
instance hasNatScalar : SMul ℕ (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨fun m x => truncateFun n (m • x.out)⟩
instance hasIntScalar : SMul ℤ (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨fun m x => truncateFun n (m • x.out)⟩
instance hasNatPow : Pow (TruncatedWittVector p n R) ℕ :=
⟨fun x m => truncateFun n (x.out ^ m)⟩
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero (i : Fin n) : (0 : TruncatedWittVector p n R).coeff i = 0 := by
show coeff i (truncateFun _ 0 : TruncatedWittVector p n R) = 0
rw [coeff_truncateFun, WittVector.zero_coeff]
end TruncatedWittVector
/-- A macro tactic used to prove that `truncateFun` respects ring operations. -/
macro (name := witt_truncateFun_tac) "witt_truncateFun_tac" : tactic =>
`(tactic|
{ show _ = WittVector.truncateFun n _
apply TruncatedWittVector.out_injective
iterate rw [WittVector.out_truncateFun]
first
| rw [WittVector.init_add]
| rw [WittVector.init_mul]
| rw [WittVector.init_neg]
| rw [WittVector.init_sub]
| rw [WittVector.init_nsmul]
| rw [WittVector.init_zsmul]
| rw [WittVector.init_pow]})
namespace WittVector
variable (p n R)
variable [CommRing R]
theorem truncateFun_surjective : Surjective (@truncateFun p n R) :=
Function.RightInverse.surjective TruncatedWittVector.truncateFun_out
variable [Fact p.Prime]
@[simp]
theorem truncateFun_zero : truncateFun n (0 : 𝕎 R) = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem truncateFun_one : truncateFun n (1 : 𝕎 R) = 1 := rfl
variable {p R}
@[simp]
theorem truncateFun_add (x y : 𝕎 R) :
truncateFun n (x + y) = truncateFun n x + truncateFun n y := by
witt_truncateFun_tac
@[simp]
theorem truncateFun_mul (x y : 𝕎 R) :
truncateFun n (x * y) = truncateFun n x * truncateFun n y := by
witt_truncateFun_tac
theorem truncateFun_neg (x : 𝕎 R) : truncateFun n (-x) = -truncateFun n x := by
witt_truncateFun_tac
theorem truncateFun_sub (x y : 𝕎 R) :
truncateFun n (x - y) = truncateFun n x - truncateFun n y := by
witt_truncateFun_tac
theorem truncateFun_nsmul (m : ℕ) (x : 𝕎 R) : truncateFun n (m • x) = m • truncateFun n x := by
witt_truncateFun_tac
theorem truncateFun_zsmul (m : ℤ) (x : 𝕎 R) : truncateFun n (m • x) = m • truncateFun n x := by
witt_truncateFun_tac
theorem truncateFun_pow (x : 𝕎 R) (m : ℕ) : truncateFun n (x ^ m) = truncateFun n x ^ m := by
witt_truncateFun_tac
theorem truncateFun_natCast (m : ℕ) : truncateFun n (m : 𝕎 R) = m := rfl
theorem truncateFun_intCast (m : ℤ) : truncateFun n (m : 𝕎 R) = m := rfl
end WittVector
namespace TruncatedWittVector
open WittVector
variable (p n R)
variable [CommRing R]
variable [Fact p.Prime]
instance instCommRing : CommRing (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
(truncateFun_surjective p n R).commRing _ (truncateFun_zero p n R) (truncateFun_one p n R)
(truncateFun_add n) (truncateFun_mul n) (truncateFun_neg n) (truncateFun_sub n)
(truncateFun_nsmul n) (truncateFun_zsmul n) (truncateFun_pow n) (truncateFun_natCast n)
(truncateFun_intCast n)
end TruncatedWittVector
namespace WittVector
open TruncatedWittVector
variable (n)
variable [CommRing R]
variable [Fact p.Prime]
/-- `truncate n` is a ring homomorphism that truncates `x` to its first `n` entries
to obtain a `TruncatedWittVector`, which has the same base `p` as `x`. -/
noncomputable def truncate : 𝕎 R →+* TruncatedWittVector p n R where
toFun := truncateFun n
map_zero' := truncateFun_zero p n R
map_add' := truncateFun_add n
map_one' := truncateFun_one p n R
map_mul' := truncateFun_mul n
variable (p R)
theorem truncate_surjective : Surjective (truncate n : 𝕎 R → TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
truncateFun_surjective p n R
variable {p n R}
@[simp]
theorem coeff_truncate (x : 𝕎 R) (i : Fin n) : (truncate n x).coeff i = x.coeff i :=
coeff_truncateFun _ _
variable (n)
theorem mem_ker_truncate (x : 𝕎 R) :
x ∈ RingHom.ker (truncate (p := p) n) ↔ ∀ i < n, x.coeff i = 0 := by
simp only [RingHom.mem_ker, truncate, truncateFun, RingHom.coe_mk, TruncatedWittVector.ext_iff,
TruncatedWittVector.coeff_mk, coeff_zero]
exact Fin.forall_iff
variable (p)
@[simp]
theorem truncate_mk' (f : ℕ → R) :
truncate n (@mk' p _ f) = TruncatedWittVector.mk _ fun k => f k := by
ext i
simp only [coeff_truncate, TruncatedWittVector.coeff_mk]
end WittVector
namespace TruncatedWittVector
variable [CommRing R]
section
variable [Fact p.Prime]
/-- A ring homomorphism that truncates a truncated Witt vector of length `m` to
a truncated Witt vector of length `n`, for `n ≤ m`.
-/
def truncate {m : ℕ} (hm : n ≤ m) : TruncatedWittVector p m R →+* TruncatedWittVector p n R :=
RingHom.liftOfRightInverse (WittVector.truncate m) out truncateFun_out
⟨WittVector.truncate n, by
intro x
simp only [WittVector.mem_ker_truncate]
intro h i hi
exact h i (lt_of_lt_of_le hi hm)⟩
@[simp]
theorem truncate_comp_wittVector_truncate {m : ℕ} (hm : n ≤ m) :
(truncate (p := p) (R := R) hm).comp (WittVector.truncate m) = WittVector.truncate n :=
RingHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp _ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem truncate_wittVector_truncate {m : ℕ} (hm : n ≤ m) (x : 𝕎 R) :
truncate hm (WittVector.truncate m x) = WittVector.truncate n x :=
RingHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp_apply _ _ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem truncate_truncate {n₁ n₂ n₃ : ℕ} (h1 : n₁ ≤ n₂) (h2 : n₂ ≤ n₃)
(x : TruncatedWittVector p n₃ R) :
(truncate h1) (truncate h2 x) = truncate (h1.trans h2) x := by
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := WittVector.truncate_surjective (p := p) n₃ R x
simp only [truncate_wittVector_truncate]
@[simp]
theorem truncate_comp {n₁ n₂ n₃ : ℕ} (h1 : n₁ ≤ n₂) (h2 : n₂ ≤ n₃) :
(truncate (p := p) (R := R) h1).comp (truncate h2) = truncate (h1.trans h2) := by
ext1 x; simp only [truncate_truncate, Function.comp_apply, RingHom.coe_comp]
theorem truncate_surjective {m : ℕ} (hm : n ≤ m) : Surjective (truncate (p := p) (R := R) hm) := by
intro x
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := WittVector.truncate_surjective (p := p) _ R x
exact ⟨WittVector.truncate _ x, truncate_wittVector_truncate _ _⟩
@[simp]
theorem coeff_truncate {m : ℕ} (hm : n ≤ m) (i : Fin n) (x : TruncatedWittVector p m R) :
(truncate hm x).coeff i = x.coeff (Fin.castLE hm i) := by
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := @WittVector.truncate_surjective p _ _ _ _ x
simp only [truncate_wittVector_truncate, WittVector.coeff_truncate, Fin.coe_castLE]
end
section Fintype
instance {R : Type*} [Fintype R] : Fintype (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
Pi.instFintype
variable (p n R)
theorem card {R : Type*} [Fintype R] :
Fintype.card (TruncatedWittVector p n R) = Fintype.card R ^ n := by
simp only [TruncatedWittVector, Fintype.card_fin, Fintype.card_fun]
end Fintype
variable [Fact p.Prime]
theorem iInf_ker_truncate : ⨅ i : ℕ, RingHom.ker (WittVector.truncate (p := p) (R := R) i) = ⊥ := by
rw [Submodule.eq_bot_iff]
intro x hx
ext
simp only [WittVector.mem_ker_truncate, Ideal.mem_iInf, WittVector.zero_coeff] at hx ⊢
exact hx _ _ (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
end TruncatedWittVector
namespace WittVector
open TruncatedWittVector hiding truncate coeff
section lift
variable [CommRing R]
variable [Fact p.Prime]
variable {S : Type*} [Semiring S]
variable (f : ∀ k : ℕ, S →+* TruncatedWittVector p k R)
variable
(f_compat : ∀ (k₁ k₂ : ℕ) (hk : k₁ ≤ k₂), (TruncatedWittVector.truncate hk).comp (f k₂) = f k₁)
variable (n)
/-- Given a family `fₖ : S → TruncatedWittVector p k R` and `s : S`, we produce a Witt vector by
defining the `k`th entry to be the final entry of `fₖ s`.
-/
def liftFun (s : S) : 𝕎 R :=
@WittVector.mk' p _ fun k => TruncatedWittVector.coeff (Fin.last k) (f (k + 1) s)
variable {f} in
include f_compat in
@[simp]
theorem truncate_liftFun (s : S) : WittVector.truncate n (liftFun f s) = f n s := by
ext i
simp only [liftFun, TruncatedWittVector.coeff_mk, WittVector.truncate_mk']
rw [← f_compat (i + 1) n i.is_lt, RingHom.comp_apply, TruncatedWittVector.coeff_truncate]
congr 1 with _
/--
Given compatible ring homs from `S` into `TruncatedWittVector n` for each `n`, we can lift these
to a ring hom `S → 𝕎 R`.
`lift` defines the universal property of `𝕎 R` as the inverse limit of `TruncatedWittVector n`.
-/
def lift : S →+* 𝕎 R := by
refine { toFun := liftFun f
map_zero' := ?_
map_one' := ?_
map_add' := ?_
map_mul' := ?_ } <;>
( intros
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← Ideal.mem_bot, ← iInf_ker_truncate, Ideal.mem_iInf]
simp [RingHom.mem_ker, f_compat])
variable {f}
@[simp]
theorem truncate_lift (s : S) : WittVector.truncate n (lift _ f_compat s) = f n s :=
truncate_liftFun _ f_compat s
@[simp]
theorem truncate_comp_lift : (WittVector.truncate n).comp (lift _ f_compat) = f n := by
ext1; rw [RingHom.comp_apply, truncate_lift]
/-- The uniqueness part of the universal property of `𝕎 R`. -/
theorem lift_unique (g : S →+* 𝕎 R) (g_compat : ∀ k, (WittVector.truncate k).comp g = f k) :
lift _ f_compat = g := by
ext1 x
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← Ideal.mem_bot, ← iInf_ker_truncate, Ideal.mem_iInf]
intro i
simp only [RingHom.mem_ker, g_compat, ← RingHom.comp_apply, truncate_comp_lift, RingHom.map_sub,
sub_self]
/-- The universal property of `𝕎 R` as projective limit of truncated Witt vector rings. -/
@[simps]
def liftEquiv : { f : ∀ k, S →+* TruncatedWittVector p k R // ∀ (k₁ k₂) (hk : k₁ ≤ k₂),
(TruncatedWittVector.truncate hk).comp (f k₂) = f k₁ } ≃ (S →+* 𝕎 R) where
toFun f := lift f.1 f.2
invFun g :=
⟨fun k => (truncate k).comp g, by
intro _ _ h
simp only [← RingHom.comp_assoc, truncate_comp_wittVector_truncate]⟩
left_inv := by rintro ⟨f, hf⟩; simp only [truncate_comp_lift]
right_inv _ := lift_unique _ _ fun _ => rfl
theorem hom_ext (g₁ g₂ : S →+* 𝕎 R) (h : ∀ k, (truncate k).comp g₁ = (truncate k).comp g₂) :
g₁ = g₂ :=
liftEquiv.symm.injective <| Subtype.ext <| funext h
end lift
end WittVector
| Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/Truncated.lean | 507 | 513 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Operations
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Tactic.Tauto
import Mathlib.Tactic.ByContra
import Mathlib.Util.Delaborators
import Mathlib.Tactic.Lift
/-!
# Basic properties of sets
Sets in Lean are homogeneous; all their elements have the same type. Sets whose elements
have type `X` are thus defined as `Set X := X → Prop`. Note that this function need not
be decidable. The definition is in the module `Mathlib.Data.Set.Defs`.
This file provides some basic definitions related to sets and functions not present in the
definitions file, as well as extra lemmas for functions defined in the definitions file and
`Mathlib.Data.Set.Operations` (empty set, univ, union, intersection, insert, singleton,
set-theoretic difference, complement, and powerset).
Note that a set is a term, not a type. There is a coercion from `Set α` to `Type*` sending
`s` to the corresponding subtype `↥s`.
See also the file `SetTheory/ZFC.lean`, which contains an encoding of ZFC set theory in Lean.
## Main definitions
Notation used here:
- `f : α → β` is a function,
- `s : Set α` and `s₁ s₂ : Set α` are subsets of `α`
- `t : Set β` is a subset of `β`.
Definitions in the file:
* `Nonempty s : Prop` : the predicate `s ≠ ∅`. Note that this is the preferred way to express the
fact that `s` has an element (see the Implementation Notes).
* `inclusion s₁ s₂ : ↥s₁ → ↥s₂` : the map `↥s₁ → ↥s₂` induced by an inclusion `s₁ ⊆ s₂`.
## Notation
* `sᶜ` for the complement of `s`
## Implementation notes
* `s.Nonempty` is to be preferred to `s ≠ ∅` or `∃ x, x ∈ s`. It has the advantage that
the `s.Nonempty` dot notation can be used.
* For `s : Set α`, do not use `Subtype s`. Instead use `↥s` or `(s : Type*)` or `s`.
## Tags
set, sets, subset, subsets, union, intersection, insert, singleton, complement, powerset
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
/-! ### Set coercion to a type -/
open Function
universe u v
namespace Set
variable {α : Type u} {s t : Set α}
instance instBooleanAlgebra : BooleanAlgebra (Set α) :=
{ (inferInstance : BooleanAlgebra (α → Prop)) with
sup := (· ∪ ·),
le := (· ≤ ·),
lt := fun s t => s ⊆ t ∧ ¬t ⊆ s,
inf := (· ∩ ·),
bot := ∅,
compl := (·ᶜ),
top := univ,
sdiff := (· \ ·) }
instance : HasSSubset (Set α) :=
⟨(· < ·)⟩
@[simp]
theorem top_eq_univ : (⊤ : Set α) = univ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bot_eq_empty : (⊥ : Set α) = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sup_eq_union : ((· ⊔ ·) : Set α → Set α → Set α) = (· ∪ ·) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem inf_eq_inter : ((· ⊓ ·) : Set α → Set α → Set α) = (· ∩ ·) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem le_eq_subset : ((· ≤ ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) = (· ⊆ ·) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lt_eq_ssubset : ((· < ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) = (· ⊂ ·) :=
rfl
theorem le_iff_subset : s ≤ t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
Iff.rfl
theorem lt_iff_ssubset : s < t ↔ s ⊂ t :=
Iff.rfl
alias ⟨_root_.LE.le.subset, _root_.HasSubset.Subset.le⟩ := le_iff_subset
alias ⟨_root_.LT.lt.ssubset, _root_.HasSSubset.SSubset.lt⟩ := lt_iff_ssubset
instance PiSetCoe.canLift (ι : Type u) (α : ι → Type v) [∀ i, Nonempty (α i)] (s : Set ι) :
CanLift (∀ i : s, α i) (∀ i, α i) (fun f i => f i) fun _ => True :=
PiSubtype.canLift ι α s
instance PiSetCoe.canLift' (ι : Type u) (α : Type v) [Nonempty α] (s : Set ι) :
CanLift (s → α) (ι → α) (fun f i => f i) fun _ => True :=
PiSetCoe.canLift ι (fun _ => α) s
end Set
section SetCoe
variable {α : Type u}
instance (s : Set α) : CoeTC s α := ⟨fun x => x.1⟩
theorem Set.coe_eq_subtype (s : Set α) : ↥s = { x // x ∈ s } :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Set.coe_setOf (p : α → Prop) : ↥{ x | p x } = { x // p x } :=
rfl
theorem SetCoe.forall {s : Set α} {p : s → Prop} : (∀ x : s, p x) ↔ ∀ (x) (h : x ∈ s), p ⟨x, h⟩ :=
Subtype.forall
theorem SetCoe.exists {s : Set α} {p : s → Prop} :
(∃ x : s, p x) ↔ ∃ (x : _) (h : x ∈ s), p ⟨x, h⟩ :=
Subtype.exists
theorem SetCoe.exists' {s : Set α} {p : ∀ x, x ∈ s → Prop} :
(∃ (x : _) (h : x ∈ s), p x h) ↔ ∃ x : s, p x.1 x.2 :=
(@SetCoe.exists _ _ fun x => p x.1 x.2).symm
theorem SetCoe.forall' {s : Set α} {p : ∀ x, x ∈ s → Prop} :
(∀ (x) (h : x ∈ s), p x h) ↔ ∀ x : s, p x.1 x.2 :=
(@SetCoe.forall _ _ fun x => p x.1 x.2).symm
@[simp]
theorem set_coe_cast :
∀ {s t : Set α} (H' : s = t) (H : ↥s = ↥t) (x : s), cast H x = ⟨x.1, H' ▸ x.2⟩
| _, _, rfl, _, _ => rfl
theorem SetCoe.ext {s : Set α} {a b : s} : (a : α) = b → a = b :=
Subtype.eq
theorem SetCoe.ext_iff {s : Set α} {a b : s} : (↑a : α) = ↑b ↔ a = b :=
Iff.intro SetCoe.ext fun h => h ▸ rfl
end SetCoe
/-- See also `Subtype.prop` -/
theorem Subtype.mem {α : Type*} {s : Set α} (p : s) : (p : α) ∈ s :=
p.prop
/-- Duplicate of `Eq.subset'`, which currently has elaboration problems. -/
theorem Eq.subset {α} {s t : Set α} : s = t → s ⊆ t :=
fun h₁ _ h₂ => by rw [← h₁]; exact h₂
namespace Set
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {a b : α} {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u : Set α}
instance : Inhabited (Set α) :=
⟨∅⟩
@[trans]
theorem mem_of_mem_of_subset {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hx : x ∈ s) (h : s ⊆ t) : x ∈ t :=
h hx
theorem forall_in_swap {p : α → β → Prop} : (∀ a ∈ s, ∀ (b), p a b) ↔ ∀ (b), ∀ a ∈ s, p a b := by
tauto
theorem setOf_injective : Function.Injective (@setOf α) := injective_id
theorem setOf_inj {p q : α → Prop} : { x | p x } = { x | q x } ↔ p = q := Iff.rfl
/-! ### Lemmas about `mem` and `setOf` -/
theorem mem_setOf {a : α} {p : α → Prop} : a ∈ { x | p x } ↔ p a :=
Iff.rfl
/-- This lemma is intended for use with `rw` where a membership predicate is needed,
hence the explicit argument and the equality in the reverse direction from normal.
See also `Set.mem_setOf_eq` for the reverse direction applied to an argument. -/
theorem eq_mem_setOf (p : α → Prop) : p = (· ∈ {a | p a}) := rfl
/-- If `h : a ∈ {x | p x}` then `h.out : p x`. These are definitionally equal, but this can
nevertheless be useful for various reasons, e.g. to apply further projection notation or in an
argument to `simp`. -/
theorem _root_.Membership.mem.out {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (h : a ∈ { x | p x }) : p a :=
h
theorem nmem_setOf_iff {a : α} {p : α → Prop} : a ∉ { x | p x } ↔ ¬p a :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem setOf_mem_eq {s : Set α} : { x | x ∈ s } = s :=
rfl
theorem setOf_set {s : Set α} : setOf s = s :=
rfl
theorem setOf_app_iff {p : α → Prop} {x : α} : { x | p x } x ↔ p x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_def {a : α} {s : Set α} : a ∈ s ↔ s a :=
Iff.rfl
theorem setOf_bijective : Bijective (setOf : (α → Prop) → Set α) :=
bijective_id
theorem subset_setOf {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} : s ⊆ setOf p ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s → p x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem setOf_subset {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} : setOf p ⊆ s ↔ ∀ x, p x → x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem setOf_subset_setOf {p q : α → Prop} : { a | p a } ⊆ { a | q a } ↔ ∀ a, p a → q a :=
Iff.rfl
theorem setOf_and {p q : α → Prop} : { a | p a ∧ q a } = { a | p a } ∩ { a | q a } :=
rfl
theorem setOf_or {p q : α → Prop} : { a | p a ∨ q a } = { a | p a } ∪ { a | q a } :=
rfl
/-! ### Subset and strict subset relations -/
instance : IsRefl (Set α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsRefl (Set α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsTrans (Set α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsTrans (Set α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : Trans ((· ⊆ ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) (· ⊆ ·) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show Trans (· ≤ ·) (· ≤ ·) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsAntisymm (Set α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsAntisymm (Set α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsIrrefl (Set α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsIrrefl (Set α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsTrans (Set α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsTrans (Set α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : Trans ((· ⊂ ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) (· ⊂ ·) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show Trans (· < ·) (· < ·) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : Trans ((· ⊂ ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) (· ⊆ ·) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show Trans (· < ·) (· ≤ ·) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : Trans ((· ⊆ ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) (· ⊂ ·) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show Trans (· ≤ ·) (· < ·) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsAsymm (Set α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsAsymm (Set α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsNonstrictStrictOrder (Set α) (· ⊆ ·) (· ⊂ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ => Iff.rfl⟩
-- TODO(Jeremy): write a tactic to unfold specific instances of generic notation?
theorem subset_def : (s ⊆ t) = ∀ x, x ∈ s → x ∈ t :=
rfl
theorem ssubset_def : (s ⊂ t) = (s ⊆ t ∧ ¬t ⊆ s) :=
rfl
@[refl]
theorem Subset.refl (a : Set α) : a ⊆ a := fun _ => id
theorem Subset.rfl {s : Set α} : s ⊆ s :=
Subset.refl s
@[trans]
theorem Subset.trans {a b c : Set α} (ab : a ⊆ b) (bc : b ⊆ c) : a ⊆ c := fun _ h => bc <| ab h
@[trans]
theorem mem_of_eq_of_mem {x y : α} {s : Set α} (hx : x = y) (h : y ∈ s) : x ∈ s :=
hx.symm ▸ h
theorem Subset.antisymm {a b : Set α} (h₁ : a ⊆ b) (h₂ : b ⊆ a) : a = b :=
Set.ext fun _ => ⟨@h₁ _, @h₂ _⟩
theorem Subset.antisymm_iff {a b : Set α} : a = b ↔ a ⊆ b ∧ b ⊆ a :=
⟨fun e => ⟨e.subset, e.symm.subset⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => Subset.antisymm h₁ h₂⟩
-- an alternative name
theorem eq_of_subset_of_subset {a b : Set α} : a ⊆ b → b ⊆ a → a = b :=
Subset.antisymm
theorem mem_of_subset_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : Set α} {a : α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ s₂ :=
@h _
theorem not_mem_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : a ∉ t → a ∉ s :=
mt <| mem_of_subset_of_mem h
theorem not_subset : ¬s ⊆ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, a ∉ t := by
simp only [subset_def, not_forall, exists_prop]
theorem not_top_subset : ¬⊤ ⊆ s ↔ ∃ a, a ∉ s := by
simp [not_subset]
lemma eq_of_forall_subset_iff (h : ∀ u, s ⊆ u ↔ t ⊆ u) : s = t := eq_of_forall_ge_iff h
/-! ### Definition of strict subsets `s ⊂ t` and basic properties. -/
protected theorem eq_or_ssubset_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : s = t ∨ s ⊂ t :=
eq_or_lt_of_le h
theorem exists_of_ssubset {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊂ t) : ∃ x ∈ t, x ∉ s :=
not_subset.1 h.2
protected theorem ssubset_iff_subset_ne {s t : Set α} : s ⊂ t ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ s ≠ t :=
@lt_iff_le_and_ne (Set α) _ s t
theorem ssubset_iff_of_subset {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ x ∈ t, x ∉ s :=
⟨exists_of_ssubset, fun ⟨_, hxt, hxs⟩ => ⟨h, fun h => hxs <| h hxt⟩⟩
theorem ssubset_iff_exists {s t : Set α} : s ⊂ t ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ ∃ x ∈ t, x ∉ s :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.le, Set.exists_of_ssubset h⟩, fun ⟨h1, h2⟩ ↦ (Set.ssubset_iff_of_subset h1).mpr h2⟩
protected theorem ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (hs₁s₂ : s₁ ⊂ s₂)
(hs₂s₃ : s₂ ⊆ s₃) : s₁ ⊂ s₃ :=
⟨Subset.trans hs₁s₂.1 hs₂s₃, fun hs₃s₁ => hs₁s₂.2 (Subset.trans hs₂s₃ hs₃s₁)⟩
protected theorem ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (hs₁s₂ : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(hs₂s₃ : s₂ ⊂ s₃) : s₁ ⊂ s₃ :=
⟨Subset.trans hs₁s₂ hs₂s₃.1, fun hs₃s₁ => hs₂s₃.2 (Subset.trans hs₃s₁ hs₁s₂)⟩
theorem not_mem_empty (x : α) : ¬x ∈ (∅ : Set α) :=
id
theorem not_not_mem : ¬a ∉ s ↔ a ∈ s :=
not_not
/-! ### Non-empty sets -/
theorem nonempty_coe_sort {s : Set α} : Nonempty ↥s ↔ s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_subtype
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.coe_sort⟩ := nonempty_coe_sort
theorem nonempty_def : s.Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
theorem nonempty_of_mem {x} (h : x ∈ s) : s.Nonempty :=
⟨x, h⟩
theorem Nonempty.not_subset_empty : s.Nonempty → ¬s ⊆ ∅
| ⟨_, hx⟩, hs => hs hx
/-- Extract a witness from `s.Nonempty`. This function might be used instead of case analysis
on the argument. Note that it makes a proof depend on the `Classical.choice` axiom. -/
protected noncomputable def Nonempty.some (h : s.Nonempty) : α :=
Classical.choose h
protected theorem Nonempty.some_mem (h : s.Nonempty) : h.some ∈ s :=
Classical.choose_spec h
theorem Nonempty.mono (ht : s ⊆ t) (hs : s.Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
hs.imp ht
theorem nonempty_of_not_subset (h : ¬s ⊆ t) : (s \ t).Nonempty :=
let ⟨x, xs, xt⟩ := not_subset.1 h
⟨x, xs, xt⟩
theorem nonempty_of_ssubset (ht : s ⊂ t) : (t \ s).Nonempty :=
nonempty_of_not_subset ht.2
theorem Nonempty.of_diff (h : (s \ t).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
h.imp fun _ => And.left
theorem nonempty_of_ssubset' (ht : s ⊂ t) : t.Nonempty :=
(nonempty_of_ssubset ht).of_diff
theorem Nonempty.inl (hs : s.Nonempty) : (s ∪ t).Nonempty :=
hs.imp fun _ => Or.inl
theorem Nonempty.inr (ht : t.Nonempty) : (s ∪ t).Nonempty :=
ht.imp fun _ => Or.inr
@[simp]
theorem union_nonempty : (s ∪ t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∨ t.Nonempty :=
exists_or
theorem Nonempty.left (h : (s ∩ t).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
h.imp fun _ => And.left
theorem Nonempty.right (h : (s ∩ t).Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
h.imp fun _ => And.right
theorem inter_nonempty : (s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ x ∈ t :=
Iff.rfl
theorem inter_nonempty_iff_exists_left : (s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, x ∈ t := by
simp_rw [inter_nonempty]
theorem inter_nonempty_iff_exists_right : (s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x ∈ t, x ∈ s := by
simp_rw [inter_nonempty, and_comm]
theorem nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty : Nonempty α ↔ (univ : Set α).Nonempty :=
⟨fun ⟨x⟩ => ⟨x, trivial⟩, fun ⟨x, _⟩ => ⟨x⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem univ_nonempty : ∀ [Nonempty α], (univ : Set α).Nonempty
| ⟨x⟩ => ⟨x, trivial⟩
theorem Nonempty.to_subtype : s.Nonempty → Nonempty (↥s) :=
nonempty_subtype.2
theorem Nonempty.to_type : s.Nonempty → Nonempty α := fun ⟨x, _⟩ => ⟨x⟩
instance univ.nonempty [Nonempty α] : Nonempty (↥(Set.univ : Set α)) :=
Set.univ_nonempty.to_subtype
-- Redeclare for refined keys
-- `Nonempty (@Subtype _ (@Membership.mem _ (Set _) _ (@Top.top (Set _) _)))`
instance instNonemptyTop [Nonempty α] : Nonempty (⊤ : Set α) :=
inferInstanceAs (Nonempty (univ : Set α))
theorem Nonempty.of_subtype [Nonempty (↥s)] : s.Nonempty := nonempty_subtype.mp ‹_›
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-23")] alias nonempty_of_nonempty_subtype := Nonempty.of_subtype
/-! ### Lemmas about the empty set -/
theorem empty_def : (∅ : Set α) = { _x : α | False } :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_empty_iff_false (x : α) : x ∈ (∅ : Set α) ↔ False :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem setOf_false : { _a : α | False } = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem setOf_bot : { _x : α | ⊥ } = ∅ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem empty_subset (s : Set α) : ∅ ⊆ s :=
nofun
@[simp]
theorem subset_empty_iff {s : Set α} : s ⊆ ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
(Subset.antisymm_iff.trans <| and_iff_left (empty_subset _)).symm
theorem eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem {s : Set α} : s = ∅ ↔ ∀ x, x ∉ s :=
subset_empty_iff.symm
theorem eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem (h : ∀ x, x ∉ s) : s = ∅ :=
subset_empty_iff.1 h
theorem eq_empty_of_subset_empty {s : Set α} : s ⊆ ∅ → s = ∅ :=
subset_empty_iff.1
theorem eq_empty_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (s : Set α) : s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun x _ => isEmptyElim x
/-- There is exactly one set of a type that is empty. -/
instance uniqueEmpty [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Set α) where
default := ∅
uniq := eq_empty_of_isEmpty
/-- See also `Set.nonempty_iff_ne_empty`. -/
theorem not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty {s : Set α} : ¬s.Nonempty ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp only [Set.Nonempty, not_exists, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
/-- See also `Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty`. -/
theorem nonempty_iff_ne_empty : s.Nonempty ↔ s ≠ ∅ :=
not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.not_right
/-- See also `nonempty_iff_ne_empty'`. -/
theorem not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty' : ¬Nonempty s ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [nonempty_subtype, not_exists, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
/-- See also `not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty'`. -/
theorem nonempty_iff_ne_empty' : Nonempty s ↔ s ≠ ∅ :=
not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty'.not_right
alias ⟨Nonempty.ne_empty, _⟩ := nonempty_iff_ne_empty
@[simp]
theorem not_nonempty_empty : ¬(∅ : Set α).Nonempty := fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx
@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_coe_sort {s : Set α} : IsEmpty (↥s) ↔ s = ∅ :=
not_iff_not.1 <| by simpa using nonempty_iff_ne_empty
theorem eq_empty_or_nonempty (s : Set α) : s = ∅ ∨ s.Nonempty :=
or_iff_not_imp_left.2 nonempty_iff_ne_empty.2
theorem subset_eq_empty {s t : Set α} (h : t ⊆ s) (e : s = ∅) : t = ∅ :=
subset_empty_iff.1 <| e ▸ h
theorem forall_mem_empty {p : α → Prop} : (∀ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), p x) ↔ True :=
iff_true_intro fun _ => False.elim
instance (α : Type u) : IsEmpty.{u + 1} (↥(∅ : Set α)) :=
⟨fun x => x.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem empty_ssubset : ∅ ⊂ s ↔ s.Nonempty :=
(@bot_lt_iff_ne_bot (Set α) _ _ _).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.empty_ssubset⟩ := empty_ssubset
/-!
### Universal set.
In Lean `@univ α` (or `univ : Set α`) is the set that contains all elements of type `α`.
Mathematically it is the same as `α` but it has a different type.
-/
@[simp]
theorem setOf_true : { _x : α | True } = univ :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem setOf_top : { _x : α | ⊤ } = univ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem univ_eq_empty_iff : (univ : Set α) = ∅ ↔ IsEmpty α :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.trans
⟨fun H => ⟨fun x => H x trivial⟩, fun H x _ => @IsEmpty.false α H x⟩
theorem empty_ne_univ [Nonempty α] : (∅ : Set α) ≠ univ := fun e =>
not_isEmpty_of_nonempty α <| univ_eq_empty_iff.1 e.symm
@[simp]
theorem subset_univ (s : Set α) : s ⊆ univ := fun _ _ => trivial
@[simp]
theorem univ_subset_iff {s : Set α} : univ ⊆ s ↔ s = univ :=
@top_le_iff _ _ _ s
alias ⟨eq_univ_of_univ_subset, _⟩ := univ_subset_iff
theorem eq_univ_iff_forall {s : Set α} : s = univ ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s :=
univ_subset_iff.symm.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => imp_iff_right trivial
theorem eq_univ_of_forall {s : Set α} : (∀ x, x ∈ s) → s = univ :=
eq_univ_iff_forall.2
theorem Nonempty.eq_univ [Subsingleton α] : s.Nonempty → s = univ := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
exact eq_univ_of_forall fun y => by rwa [Subsingleton.elim y x]
theorem eq_univ_of_subset {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) (hs : s = univ) : t = univ :=
eq_univ_of_univ_subset <| (hs ▸ h : univ ⊆ t)
theorem exists_mem_of_nonempty (α) : ∀ [Nonempty α], ∃ x : α, x ∈ (univ : Set α)
| ⟨x⟩ => ⟨x, trivial⟩
theorem ne_univ_iff_exists_not_mem {α : Type*} (s : Set α) : s ≠ univ ↔ ∃ a, a ∉ s := by
rw [← not_forall, ← eq_univ_iff_forall]
theorem not_subset_iff_exists_mem_not_mem {α : Type*} {s t : Set α} :
¬s ⊆ t ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ x ∉ t := by simp [subset_def]
theorem univ_unique [Unique α] : @Set.univ α = {default} :=
Set.ext fun x => iff_of_true trivial <| Subsingleton.elim x default
theorem ssubset_univ_iff : s ⊂ univ ↔ s ≠ univ :=
lt_top_iff_ne_top
instance nontrivial_of_nonempty [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Set α) :=
⟨⟨∅, univ, empty_ne_univ⟩⟩
/-! ### Lemmas about union -/
theorem union_def {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∪ s₂ = { a | a ∈ s₁ ∨ a ∈ s₂ } :=
rfl
theorem mem_union_left {x : α} {a : Set α} (b : Set α) : x ∈ a → x ∈ a ∪ b :=
Or.inl
theorem mem_union_right {x : α} {b : Set α} (a : Set α) : x ∈ b → x ∈ a ∪ b :=
Or.inr
theorem mem_or_mem_of_mem_union {x : α} {a b : Set α} (H : x ∈ a ∪ b) : x ∈ a ∨ x ∈ b :=
H
theorem MemUnion.elim {x : α} {a b : Set α} {P : Prop} (H₁ : x ∈ a ∪ b) (H₂ : x ∈ a → P)
(H₃ : x ∈ b → P) : P :=
Or.elim H₁ H₂ H₃
@[simp]
theorem mem_union (x : α) (a b : Set α) : x ∈ a ∪ b ↔ x ∈ a ∨ x ∈ b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem union_self (a : Set α) : a ∪ a = a :=
ext fun _ => or_self_iff
@[simp]
theorem union_empty (a : Set α) : a ∪ ∅ = a :=
ext fun _ => iff_of_eq (or_false _)
@[simp]
theorem empty_union (a : Set α) : ∅ ∪ a = a :=
ext fun _ => iff_of_eq (false_or _)
theorem union_comm (a b : Set α) : a ∪ b = b ∪ a :=
ext fun _ => or_comm
theorem union_assoc (a b c : Set α) : a ∪ b ∪ c = a ∪ (b ∪ c) :=
ext fun _ => or_assoc
instance union_isAssoc : Std.Associative (α := Set α) (· ∪ ·) :=
⟨union_assoc⟩
instance union_isComm : Std.Commutative (α := Set α) (· ∪ ·) :=
⟨union_comm⟩
theorem union_left_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α) : s₁ ∪ (s₂ ∪ s₃) = s₂ ∪ (s₁ ∪ s₃) :=
ext fun _ => or_left_comm
theorem union_right_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α) : s₁ ∪ s₂ ∪ s₃ = s₁ ∪ s₃ ∪ s₂ :=
ext fun _ => or_right_comm
@[simp]
theorem union_eq_left {s t : Set α} : s ∪ t = s ↔ t ⊆ s :=
sup_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem union_eq_right {s t : Set α} : s ∪ t = t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
sup_eq_right
theorem union_eq_self_of_subset_left {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ∪ t = t :=
union_eq_right.mpr h
theorem union_eq_self_of_subset_right {s t : Set α} (h : t ⊆ s) : s ∪ t = s :=
union_eq_left.mpr h
@[simp]
theorem subset_union_left {s t : Set α} : s ⊆ s ∪ t := fun _ => Or.inl
@[simp]
theorem subset_union_right {s t : Set α} : t ⊆ s ∪ t := fun _ => Or.inr
theorem union_subset {s t r : Set α} (sr : s ⊆ r) (tr : t ⊆ r) : s ∪ t ⊆ r := fun _ =>
Or.rec (@sr _) (@tr _)
@[simp]
theorem union_subset_iff {s t u : Set α} : s ∪ t ⊆ u ↔ s ⊆ u ∧ t ⊆ u :=
(forall_congr' fun _ => or_imp).trans forall_and
@[gcongr]
theorem union_subset_union {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : Set α} (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h₂ : t₁ ⊆ t₂) :
s₁ ∪ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ∪ t₂ := fun _ => Or.imp (@h₁ _) (@h₂ _)
@[gcongr]
theorem union_subset_union_left {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (t) (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ∪ t ⊆ s₂ ∪ t :=
union_subset_union h Subset.rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem union_subset_union_right (s) {t₁ t₂ : Set α} (h : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s ∪ t₁ ⊆ s ∪ t₂ :=
union_subset_union Subset.rfl h
theorem subset_union_of_subset_left {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) (u : Set α) : s ⊆ t ∪ u :=
h.trans subset_union_left
theorem subset_union_of_subset_right {s u : Set α} (h : s ⊆ u) (t : Set α) : s ⊆ t ∪ u :=
h.trans subset_union_right
theorem union_congr_left (ht : t ⊆ s ∪ u) (hu : u ⊆ s ∪ t) : s ∪ t = s ∪ u :=
sup_congr_left ht hu
theorem union_congr_right (hs : s ⊆ t ∪ u) (ht : t ⊆ s ∪ u) : s ∪ u = t ∪ u :=
sup_congr_right hs ht
theorem union_eq_union_iff_left : s ∪ t = s ∪ u ↔ t ⊆ s ∪ u ∧ u ⊆ s ∪ t :=
sup_eq_sup_iff_left
theorem union_eq_union_iff_right : s ∪ u = t ∪ u ↔ s ⊆ t ∪ u ∧ t ⊆ s ∪ u :=
sup_eq_sup_iff_right
@[simp]
theorem union_empty_iff {s t : Set α} : s ∪ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∧ t = ∅ := by
simp only [← subset_empty_iff]
exact union_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem union_univ (s : Set α) : s ∪ univ = univ := sup_top_eq _
@[simp]
theorem univ_union (s : Set α) : univ ∪ s = univ := top_sup_eq _
@[simp]
theorem ssubset_union_left_iff : s ⊂ s ∪ t ↔ ¬ t ⊆ s :=
left_lt_sup
@[simp]
theorem ssubset_union_right_iff : t ⊂ s ∪ t ↔ ¬ s ⊆ t :=
right_lt_sup
/-! ### Lemmas about intersection -/
theorem inter_def {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∩ s₂ = { a | a ∈ s₁ ∧ a ∈ s₂ } :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mem_inter_iff (x : α) (a b : Set α) : x ∈ a ∩ b ↔ x ∈ a ∧ x ∈ b :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_inter {x : α} {a b : Set α} (ha : x ∈ a) (hb : x ∈ b) : x ∈ a ∩ b :=
⟨ha, hb⟩
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_left {x : α} {a b : Set α} (h : x ∈ a ∩ b) : x ∈ a :=
h.left
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_right {x : α} {a b : Set α} (h : x ∈ a ∩ b) : x ∈ b :=
h.right
@[simp]
theorem inter_self (a : Set α) : a ∩ a = a :=
ext fun _ => and_self_iff
@[simp]
theorem inter_empty (a : Set α) : a ∩ ∅ = ∅ :=
ext fun _ => iff_of_eq (and_false _)
@[simp]
theorem empty_inter (a : Set α) : ∅ ∩ a = ∅ :=
ext fun _ => iff_of_eq (false_and _)
theorem inter_comm (a b : Set α) : a ∩ b = b ∩ a :=
ext fun _ => and_comm
theorem inter_assoc (a b c : Set α) : a ∩ b ∩ c = a ∩ (b ∩ c) :=
ext fun _ => and_assoc
instance inter_isAssoc : Std.Associative (α := Set α) (· ∩ ·) :=
⟨inter_assoc⟩
instance inter_isComm : Std.Commutative (α := Set α) (· ∩ ·) :=
⟨inter_comm⟩
theorem inter_left_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α) : s₁ ∩ (s₂ ∩ s₃) = s₂ ∩ (s₁ ∩ s₃) :=
ext fun _ => and_left_comm
theorem inter_right_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α) : s₁ ∩ s₂ ∩ s₃ = s₁ ∩ s₃ ∩ s₂ :=
ext fun _ => and_right_comm
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem inter_subset_left {s t : Set α} : s ∩ t ⊆ s := fun _ => And.left
@[simp]
theorem inter_subset_right {s t : Set α} : s ∩ t ⊆ t := fun _ => And.right
theorem subset_inter {s t r : Set α} (rs : r ⊆ s) (rt : r ⊆ t) : r ⊆ s ∩ t := fun _ h =>
⟨rs h, rt h⟩
@[simp]
theorem subset_inter_iff {s t r : Set α} : r ⊆ s ∩ t ↔ r ⊆ s ∧ r ⊆ t :=
(forall_congr' fun _ => imp_and).trans forall_and
@[simp] lemma inter_eq_left : s ∩ t = s ↔ s ⊆ t := inf_eq_left
@[simp] lemma inter_eq_right : s ∩ t = t ↔ t ⊆ s := inf_eq_right
@[simp] lemma left_eq_inter : s = s ∩ t ↔ s ⊆ t := left_eq_inf
@[simp] lemma right_eq_inter : t = s ∩ t ↔ t ⊆ s := right_eq_inf
theorem inter_eq_self_of_subset_left {s t : Set α} : s ⊆ t → s ∩ t = s :=
inter_eq_left.mpr
theorem inter_eq_self_of_subset_right {s t : Set α} : t ⊆ s → s ∩ t = t :=
inter_eq_right.mpr
theorem inter_congr_left (ht : s ∩ u ⊆ t) (hu : s ∩ t ⊆ u) : s ∩ t = s ∩ u :=
inf_congr_left ht hu
theorem inter_congr_right (hs : t ∩ u ⊆ s) (ht : s ∩ u ⊆ t) : s ∩ u = t ∩ u :=
inf_congr_right hs ht
theorem inter_eq_inter_iff_left : s ∩ t = s ∩ u ↔ s ∩ u ⊆ t ∧ s ∩ t ⊆ u :=
inf_eq_inf_iff_left
theorem inter_eq_inter_iff_right : s ∩ u = t ∩ u ↔ t ∩ u ⊆ s ∧ s ∩ u ⊆ t :=
inf_eq_inf_iff_right
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem inter_univ (a : Set α) : a ∩ univ = a := inf_top_eq _
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem univ_inter (a : Set α) : univ ∩ a = a := top_inf_eq _
@[gcongr]
theorem inter_subset_inter {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : Set α} (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ t₁) (h₂ : s₂ ⊆ t₂) :
s₁ ∩ s₂ ⊆ t₁ ∩ t₂ := fun _ => And.imp (@h₁ _) (@h₂ _)
@[gcongr]
theorem inter_subset_inter_left {s t : Set α} (u : Set α) (H : s ⊆ t) : s ∩ u ⊆ t ∩ u :=
inter_subset_inter H Subset.rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem inter_subset_inter_right {s t : Set α} (u : Set α) (H : s ⊆ t) : u ∩ s ⊆ u ∩ t :=
inter_subset_inter Subset.rfl H
theorem union_inter_cancel_left {s t : Set α} : (s ∪ t) ∩ s = s :=
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right subset_union_left
theorem union_inter_cancel_right {s t : Set α} : (s ∪ t) ∩ t = t :=
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right subset_union_right
theorem inter_setOf_eq_sep (s : Set α) (p : α → Prop) : s ∩ {a | p a} = {a ∈ s | p a} :=
rfl
theorem setOf_inter_eq_sep (p : α → Prop) (s : Set α) : {a | p a} ∩ s = {a ∈ s | p a} :=
inter_comm _ _
@[simp]
theorem inter_ssubset_right_iff : s ∩ t ⊂ t ↔ ¬ t ⊆ s :=
inf_lt_right
@[simp]
theorem inter_ssubset_left_iff : s ∩ t ⊂ s ↔ ¬ s ⊆ t :=
inf_lt_left
/-! ### Distributivity laws -/
theorem inter_union_distrib_left (s t u : Set α) : s ∩ (t ∪ u) = s ∩ t ∪ s ∩ u :=
inf_sup_left _ _ _
theorem union_inter_distrib_right (s t u : Set α) : (s ∪ t) ∩ u = s ∩ u ∪ t ∩ u :=
inf_sup_right _ _ _
theorem union_inter_distrib_left (s t u : Set α) : s ∪ t ∩ u = (s ∪ t) ∩ (s ∪ u) :=
sup_inf_left _ _ _
theorem inter_union_distrib_right (s t u : Set α) : s ∩ t ∪ u = (s ∪ u) ∩ (t ∪ u) :=
sup_inf_right _ _ _
theorem union_union_distrib_left (s t u : Set α) : s ∪ (t ∪ u) = s ∪ t ∪ (s ∪ u) :=
sup_sup_distrib_left _ _ _
theorem union_union_distrib_right (s t u : Set α) : s ∪ t ∪ u = s ∪ u ∪ (t ∪ u) :=
sup_sup_distrib_right _ _ _
theorem inter_inter_distrib_left (s t u : Set α) : s ∩ (t ∩ u) = s ∩ t ∩ (s ∩ u) :=
inf_inf_distrib_left _ _ _
theorem inter_inter_distrib_right (s t u : Set α) : s ∩ t ∩ u = s ∩ u ∩ (t ∩ u) :=
inf_inf_distrib_right _ _ _
theorem union_union_union_comm (s t u v : Set α) : s ∪ t ∪ (u ∪ v) = s ∪ u ∪ (t ∪ v) :=
sup_sup_sup_comm _ _ _ _
theorem inter_inter_inter_comm (s t u v : Set α) : s ∩ t ∩ (u ∩ v) = s ∩ u ∩ (t ∩ v) :=
inf_inf_inf_comm _ _ _ _
/-! ### Lemmas about sets defined as `{x ∈ s | p x}`. -/
section Sep
variable {p q : α → Prop} {x : α}
theorem mem_sep (xs : x ∈ s) (px : p x) : x ∈ { x ∈ s | p x } :=
⟨xs, px⟩
@[simp]
theorem sep_mem_eq : { x ∈ s | x ∈ t } = s ∩ t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_sep_iff : x ∈ { x ∈ s | p x } ↔ x ∈ s ∧ p x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem sep_ext_iff : { x ∈ s | p x } = { x ∈ s | q x } ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, p x ↔ q x := by
simp_rw [Set.ext_iff, mem_sep_iff, and_congr_right_iff]
theorem sep_eq_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : { x ∈ t | x ∈ s } = s :=
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h
@[simp]
theorem sep_subset (s : Set α) (p : α → Prop) : { x ∈ s | p x } ⊆ s := fun _ => And.left
@[simp]
theorem sep_eq_self_iff_mem_true : { x ∈ s | p x } = s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, p x := by
simp_rw [Set.ext_iff, mem_sep_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
@[simp]
theorem sep_eq_empty_iff_mem_false : { x ∈ s | p x } = ∅ ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ¬p x := by
simp_rw [Set.ext_iff, mem_sep_iff, mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false, not_and]
theorem sep_true : { x ∈ s | True } = s :=
inter_univ s
theorem sep_false : { x ∈ s | False } = ∅ :=
inter_empty s
theorem sep_empty (p : α → Prop) : { x ∈ (∅ : Set α) | p x } = ∅ :=
empty_inter {x | p x}
theorem sep_univ : { x ∈ (univ : Set α) | p x } = { x | p x } :=
univ_inter {x | p x}
@[simp]
theorem sep_union : { x | (x ∈ s ∨ x ∈ t) ∧ p x } = { x ∈ s | p x } ∪ { x ∈ t | p x } :=
union_inter_distrib_right { x | x ∈ s } { x | x ∈ t } p
@[simp]
theorem sep_inter : { x | (x ∈ s ∧ x ∈ t) ∧ p x } = { x ∈ s | p x } ∩ { x ∈ t | p x } :=
inter_inter_distrib_right s t {x | p x}
@[simp]
theorem sep_and : { x ∈ s | p x ∧ q x } = { x ∈ s | p x } ∩ { x ∈ s | q x } :=
inter_inter_distrib_left s {x | p x} {x | q x}
@[simp]
theorem sep_or : { x ∈ s | p x ∨ q x } = { x ∈ s | p x } ∪ { x ∈ s | q x } :=
inter_union_distrib_left s p q
@[simp]
theorem sep_setOf : { x ∈ { y | p y } | q x } = { x | p x ∧ q x } :=
rfl
end Sep
/-- See also `Set.sdiff_inter_right_comm`. -/
lemma inter_diff_assoc (a b c : Set α) : (a ∩ b) \ c = a ∩ (b \ c) := inf_sdiff_assoc ..
/-- See also `Set.inter_diff_assoc`. -/
lemma sdiff_inter_right_comm (s t u : Set α) : s \ t ∩ u = (s ∩ u) \ t := sdiff_inf_right_comm ..
lemma inter_sdiff_left_comm (s t u : Set α) : s ∩ (t \ u) = t ∩ (s \ u) := inf_sdiff_left_comm ..
theorem diff_union_diff_cancel (hts : t ⊆ s) (hut : u ⊆ t) : s \ t ∪ t \ u = s \ u :=
sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel hts hut
/-- A version of `diff_union_diff_cancel` with more general hypotheses. -/
theorem diff_union_diff_cancel' (hi : s ∩ u ⊆ t) (hu : t ⊆ s ∪ u) : (s \ t) ∪ (t \ u) = s \ u :=
sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel' hi hu
theorem diff_diff_eq_sdiff_union (h : u ⊆ s) : s \ (t \ u) = s \ t ∪ u := sdiff_sdiff_eq_sdiff_sup h
theorem inter_diff_distrib_left (s t u : Set α) : s ∩ (t \ u) = (s ∩ t) \ (s ∩ u) :=
inf_sdiff_distrib_left _ _ _
theorem inter_diff_distrib_right (s t u : Set α) : (s \ t) ∩ u = (s ∩ u) \ (t ∩ u) :=
inf_sdiff_distrib_right _ _ _
theorem diff_inter_distrib_right (s t r : Set α) : (t ∩ r) \ s = (t \ s) ∩ (r \ s) :=
inf_sdiff
/-! ### Lemmas about complement -/
theorem compl_def (s : Set α) : sᶜ = { x | x ∉ s } :=
rfl
theorem mem_compl {s : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∉ s) : x ∈ sᶜ :=
h
theorem compl_setOf {α} (p : α → Prop) : { a | p a }ᶜ = { a | ¬p a } :=
rfl
theorem not_mem_of_mem_compl {s : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ sᶜ) : x ∉ s :=
h
theorem not_mem_compl_iff {x : α} : x ∉ sᶜ ↔ x ∈ s :=
not_not
@[simp]
theorem inter_compl_self (s : Set α) : s ∩ sᶜ = ∅ :=
inf_compl_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem compl_inter_self (s : Set α) : sᶜ ∩ s = ∅ :=
compl_inf_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem compl_empty : (∅ : Set α)ᶜ = univ :=
compl_bot
@[simp]
theorem compl_union (s t : Set α) : (s ∪ t)ᶜ = sᶜ ∩ tᶜ :=
compl_sup
theorem compl_inter (s t : Set α) : (s ∩ t)ᶜ = sᶜ ∪ tᶜ :=
compl_inf
@[simp]
theorem compl_univ : (univ : Set α)ᶜ = ∅ :=
compl_top
@[simp]
theorem compl_empty_iff {s : Set α} : sᶜ = ∅ ↔ s = univ :=
compl_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem compl_univ_iff {s : Set α} : sᶜ = univ ↔ s = ∅ :=
compl_eq_top
theorem compl_ne_univ : sᶜ ≠ univ ↔ s.Nonempty :=
compl_univ_iff.not.trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
lemma inl_compl_union_inr_compl {α β : Type*} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
Sum.inl '' sᶜ ∪ Sum.inr '' tᶜ = (Sum.inl '' s ∪ Sum.inr '' t)ᶜ := by
rw [compl_union]
aesop
theorem nonempty_compl : sᶜ.Nonempty ↔ s ≠ univ :=
(ne_univ_iff_exists_not_mem s).symm
theorem union_eq_compl_compl_inter_compl (s t : Set α) : s ∪ t = (sᶜ ∩ tᶜ)ᶜ :=
ext fun _ => or_iff_not_and_not
theorem inter_eq_compl_compl_union_compl (s t : Set α) : s ∩ t = (sᶜ ∪ tᶜ)ᶜ :=
ext fun _ => and_iff_not_or_not
@[simp]
theorem union_compl_self (s : Set α) : s ∪ sᶜ = univ :=
eq_univ_iff_forall.2 fun _ => em _
@[simp]
theorem compl_union_self (s : Set α) : sᶜ ∪ s = univ := by rw [union_comm, union_compl_self]
theorem compl_subset_comm : sᶜ ⊆ t ↔ tᶜ ⊆ s :=
@compl_le_iff_compl_le _ s _ _
theorem subset_compl_comm : s ⊆ tᶜ ↔ t ⊆ sᶜ :=
@le_compl_iff_le_compl _ _ _ t
@[simp]
theorem compl_subset_compl : sᶜ ⊆ tᶜ ↔ t ⊆ s :=
@compl_le_compl_iff_le (Set α) _ _ _
@[gcongr] theorem compl_subset_compl_of_subset (h : t ⊆ s) : sᶜ ⊆ tᶜ := compl_subset_compl.2 h
theorem subset_union_compl_iff_inter_subset {s t u : Set α} : s ⊆ t ∪ uᶜ ↔ s ∩ u ⊆ t :=
(@isCompl_compl _ u _).le_sup_right_iff_inf_left_le
theorem compl_subset_iff_union {s t : Set α} : sᶜ ⊆ t ↔ s ∪ t = univ :=
Iff.symm <| eq_univ_iff_forall.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => or_iff_not_imp_left
theorem inter_subset (a b c : Set α) : a ∩ b ⊆ c ↔ a ⊆ bᶜ ∪ c :=
forall_congr' fun _ => and_imp.trans <| imp_congr_right fun _ => imp_iff_not_or
theorem inter_compl_nonempty_iff {s t : Set α} : (s ∩ tᶜ).Nonempty ↔ ¬s ⊆ t :=
(not_subset.trans <| exists_congr fun x => by simp [mem_compl]).symm
/-! ### Lemmas about set difference -/
theorem not_mem_diff_of_mem {s t : Set α} {x : α} (hx : x ∈ t) : x ∉ s \ t := fun h => h.2 hx
theorem mem_of_mem_diff {s t : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s \ t) : x ∈ s :=
h.left
theorem not_mem_of_mem_diff {s t : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s \ t) : x ∉ t :=
h.right
theorem diff_eq_compl_inter {s t : Set α} : s \ t = tᶜ ∩ s := by rw [diff_eq, inter_comm]
theorem diff_nonempty {s t : Set α} : (s \ t).Nonempty ↔ ¬s ⊆ t :=
inter_compl_nonempty_iff
theorem diff_subset {s t : Set α} : s \ t ⊆ s := show s \ t ≤ s from sdiff_le
theorem diff_subset_compl (s t : Set α) : s \ t ⊆ tᶜ :=
diff_eq_compl_inter ▸ inter_subset_left
theorem union_diff_cancel' {s t u : Set α} (h₁ : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : t ⊆ u) : t ∪ u \ s = u :=
sup_sdiff_cancel' h₁ h₂
theorem union_diff_cancel {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ∪ t \ s = t :=
sup_sdiff_cancel_right h
theorem union_diff_cancel_left {s t : Set α} (h : s ∩ t ⊆ ∅) : (s ∪ t) \ s = t :=
Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_left <| disjoint_iff_inf_le.2 h
theorem union_diff_cancel_right {s t : Set α} (h : s ∩ t ⊆ ∅) : (s ∪ t) \ t = s :=
Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_right <| disjoint_iff_inf_le.2 h
@[simp]
theorem union_diff_left {s t : Set α} : (s ∪ t) \ s = t \ s :=
sup_sdiff_left_self
@[simp]
theorem union_diff_right {s t : Set α} : (s ∪ t) \ t = s \ t :=
sup_sdiff_right_self
theorem union_diff_distrib {s t u : Set α} : (s ∪ t) \ u = s \ u ∪ t \ u :=
sup_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem inter_diff_self (a b : Set α) : a ∩ (b \ a) = ∅ :=
inf_sdiff_self_right
@[simp]
theorem inter_union_diff (s t : Set α) : s ∩ t ∪ s \ t = s :=
sup_inf_sdiff s t
@[simp]
theorem diff_union_inter (s t : Set α) : s \ t ∪ s ∩ t = s := by
rw [union_comm]
exact sup_inf_sdiff _ _
@[simp]
theorem inter_union_compl (s t : Set α) : s ∩ t ∪ s ∩ tᶜ = s :=
inter_union_diff _ _
@[gcongr]
theorem diff_subset_diff {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : Set α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → t₂ ⊆ t₁ → s₁ \ t₁ ⊆ s₂ \ t₂ :=
show s₁ ≤ s₂ → t₂ ≤ t₁ → s₁ \ t₁ ≤ s₂ \ t₂ from sdiff_le_sdiff
@[gcongr]
theorem diff_subset_diff_left {s₁ s₂ t : Set α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ \ t ⊆ s₂ \ t :=
sdiff_le_sdiff_right ‹s₁ ≤ s₂›
@[gcongr]
theorem diff_subset_diff_right {s t u : Set α} (h : t ⊆ u) : s \ u ⊆ s \ t :=
sdiff_le_sdiff_left ‹t ≤ u›
theorem diff_subset_diff_iff_subset {r : Set α} (hs : s ⊆ r) (ht : t ⊆ r) :
r \ s ⊆ r \ t ↔ t ⊆ s :=
sdiff_le_sdiff_iff_le hs ht
theorem compl_eq_univ_diff (s : Set α) : sᶜ = univ \ s :=
top_sdiff.symm
@[simp]
theorem empty_diff (s : Set α) : (∅ \ s : Set α) = ∅ :=
bot_sdiff
theorem diff_eq_empty {s t : Set α} : s \ t = ∅ ↔ s ⊆ t :=
sdiff_eq_bot_iff
@[simp]
theorem diff_empty {s : Set α} : s \ ∅ = s :=
sdiff_bot
@[simp]
theorem diff_univ (s : Set α) : s \ univ = ∅ :=
diff_eq_empty.2 (subset_univ s)
theorem diff_diff {u : Set α} : (s \ t) \ u = s \ (t ∪ u) :=
sdiff_sdiff_left
-- the following statement contains parentheses to help the reader
theorem diff_diff_comm {s t u : Set α} : (s \ t) \ u = (s \ u) \ t :=
sdiff_sdiff_comm
theorem diff_subset_iff {s t u : Set α} : s \ t ⊆ u ↔ s ⊆ t ∪ u :=
show s \ t ≤ u ↔ s ≤ t ∪ u from sdiff_le_iff
theorem subset_diff_union (s t : Set α) : s ⊆ s \ t ∪ t :=
show s ≤ s \ t ∪ t from le_sdiff_sup
theorem diff_union_of_subset {s t : Set α} (h : t ⊆ s) : s \ t ∪ t = s :=
Subset.antisymm (union_subset diff_subset h) (subset_diff_union _ _)
theorem diff_subset_comm {s t u : Set α} : s \ t ⊆ u ↔ s \ u ⊆ t :=
show s \ t ≤ u ↔ s \ u ≤ t from sdiff_le_comm
theorem diff_inter {s t u : Set α} : s \ (t ∩ u) = s \ t ∪ s \ u :=
sdiff_inf
theorem diff_inter_diff : s \ t ∩ (s \ u) = s \ (t ∪ u) :=
sdiff_sup.symm
theorem diff_compl : s \ tᶜ = s ∩ t :=
sdiff_compl
theorem compl_diff : (t \ s)ᶜ = s ∪ tᶜ :=
Eq.trans compl_sdiff himp_eq
theorem diff_diff_right {s t u : Set α} : s \ (t \ u) = s \ t ∪ s ∩ u :=
sdiff_sdiff_right'
theorem inter_diff_right_comm : (s ∩ t) \ u = s \ u ∩ t := by
rw [diff_eq, diff_eq, inter_right_comm]
theorem diff_inter_right_comm : (s \ u) ∩ t = (s ∩ t) \ u := by
rw [diff_eq, diff_eq, inter_right_comm]
@[simp]
theorem union_diff_self {s t : Set α} : s ∪ t \ s = s ∪ t :=
sup_sdiff_self _ _
@[simp]
theorem diff_union_self {s t : Set α} : s \ t ∪ t = s ∪ t :=
sdiff_sup_self _ _
@[simp]
theorem diff_inter_self {a b : Set α} : b \ a ∩ a = ∅ :=
inf_sdiff_self_left
@[simp]
theorem diff_inter_self_eq_diff {s t : Set α} : s \ (t ∩ s) = s \ t :=
sdiff_inf_self_right _ _
@[simp]
theorem diff_self_inter {s t : Set α} : s \ (s ∩ t) = s \ t :=
sdiff_inf_self_left _ _
theorem diff_self {s : Set α} : s \ s = ∅ :=
sdiff_self
theorem diff_diff_right_self (s t : Set α) : s \ (s \ t) = s ∩ t :=
sdiff_sdiff_right_self
theorem diff_diff_cancel_left {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : t \ (t \ s) = s :=
sdiff_sdiff_eq_self h
theorem union_eq_diff_union_diff_union_inter (s t : Set α) : s ∪ t = s \ t ∪ t \ s ∪ s ∩ t :=
sup_eq_sdiff_sup_sdiff_sup_inf
/-! ### Powerset -/
theorem mem_powerset {x s : Set α} (h : x ⊆ s) : x ∈ 𝒫 s := @h
theorem subset_of_mem_powerset {x s : Set α} (h : x ∈ 𝒫 s) : x ⊆ s := @h
@[simp]
theorem mem_powerset_iff (x s : Set α) : x ∈ 𝒫 s ↔ x ⊆ s :=
Iff.rfl
theorem powerset_inter (s t : Set α) : 𝒫(s ∩ t) = 𝒫 s ∩ 𝒫 t :=
ext fun _ => subset_inter_iff
@[simp]
theorem powerset_mono : 𝒫 s ⊆ 𝒫 t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨fun h => @h _ (fun _ h => h), fun h _ hu _ ha => h (hu ha)⟩
theorem monotone_powerset : Monotone (powerset : Set α → Set (Set α)) := fun _ _ => powerset_mono.2
@[simp]
theorem powerset_nonempty : (𝒫 s).Nonempty :=
⟨∅, fun _ h => empty_subset s h⟩
@[simp]
theorem powerset_empty : 𝒫(∅ : Set α) = {∅} :=
ext fun _ => subset_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem powerset_univ : 𝒫(univ : Set α) = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall subset_univ
/-! ### Sets defined as an if-then-else -/
@[deprecated _root_.mem_dite (since := "2025-01-30")]
protected theorem mem_dite (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) (t : ¬ p → Set α) (x : α) :
(x ∈ if h : p then s h else t h) ↔ (∀ h : p, x ∈ s h) ∧ ∀ h : ¬p, x ∈ t h :=
_root_.mem_dite
theorem mem_dite_univ_right (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (t : p → Set α) (x : α) :
(x ∈ if h : p then t h else univ) ↔ ∀ h : p, x ∈ t h := by
simp [mem_dite]
@[simp]
theorem mem_ite_univ_right (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (t : Set α) (x : α) :
x ∈ ite p t Set.univ ↔ p → x ∈ t :=
mem_dite_univ_right p (fun _ => t) x
theorem mem_dite_univ_left (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (t : ¬p → Set α) (x : α) :
(x ∈ if h : p then univ else t h) ↔ ∀ h : ¬p, x ∈ t h := by
split_ifs <;> simp_all
@[simp]
theorem mem_ite_univ_left (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (t : Set α) (x : α) :
x ∈ ite p Set.univ t ↔ ¬p → x ∈ t :=
mem_dite_univ_left p (fun _ => t) x
theorem mem_dite_empty_right (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (t : p → Set α) (x : α) :
(x ∈ if h : p then t h else ∅) ↔ ∃ h : p, x ∈ t h := by
simp only [mem_dite, mem_empty_iff_false, imp_false, not_not]
exact ⟨fun h => ⟨h.2, h.1 h.2⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨fun _ => h₂, h₁⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_ite_empty_right (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (t : Set α) (x : α) :
x ∈ ite p t ∅ ↔ p ∧ x ∈ t :=
(mem_dite_empty_right p (fun _ => t) x).trans (by simp)
theorem mem_dite_empty_left (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (t : ¬p → Set α) (x : α) :
(x ∈ if h : p then ∅ else t h) ↔ ∃ h : ¬p, x ∈ t h := by
simp only [mem_dite, mem_empty_iff_false, imp_false]
exact ⟨fun h => ⟨h.1, h.2 h.1⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨fun h => h₁ h, fun _ => h₂⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_ite_empty_left (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (t : Set α) (x : α) :
| x ∈ ite p ∅ t ↔ ¬p ∧ x ∈ t :=
(mem_dite_empty_left p (fun _ => t) x).trans (by simp)
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Basic.lean | 1,314 | 1,315 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Int.LeastGreatest
/-!
## `ℤ` forms a conditionally complete linear order
The integers form a conditionally complete linear order.
-/
open Int
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical in
instance instConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder : ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder ℤ where
__ := instLinearOrder
__ := LinearOrder.toLattice
sSup s :=
if h : s.Nonempty ∧ BddAbove s then
greatestOfBdd (Classical.choose h.2) (Classical.choose_spec h.2) h.1
else 0
sInf s :=
if h : s.Nonempty ∧ BddBelow s then
leastOfBdd (Classical.choose h.2) (Classical.choose_spec h.2) h.1
else 0
le_csSup s n hs hns := by
have : s.Nonempty ∧ BddAbove s := ⟨⟨n, hns⟩, hs⟩
simp only [dif_pos this]
exact (greatestOfBdd _ _ _).2.2 n hns
csSup_le s n hs hns := by
have : s.Nonempty ∧ BddAbove s := ⟨hs, ⟨n, hns⟩⟩
simp only [dif_pos this]
exact hns (greatestOfBdd _ (Classical.choose_spec this.2) _).2.1
csInf_le s n hs hns := by
have : s.Nonempty ∧ BddBelow s := ⟨⟨n, hns⟩, hs⟩
simp only [dif_pos this]
exact (leastOfBdd _ _ _).2.2 n hns
le_csInf s n hs hns := by
have : s.Nonempty ∧ BddBelow s := ⟨hs, ⟨n, hns⟩⟩
simp only [dif_pos this]
exact hns (leastOfBdd _ (Classical.choose_spec this.2) _).2.1
csSup_of_not_bddAbove := fun s hs ↦ by simp [hs]
csInf_of_not_bddBelow := fun s hs ↦ by simp [hs]
namespace Int
theorem csSup_eq_greatest_of_bdd {s : Set ℤ} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (b : ℤ) (Hb : ∀ z ∈ s, z ≤ b)
(Hinh : ∃ z : ℤ, z ∈ s) : sSup s = greatestOfBdd b Hb Hinh := by
have : s.Nonempty ∧ BddAbove s := ⟨Hinh, b, Hb⟩
simp only [sSup, dif_pos this]
convert (coe_greatestOfBdd_eq Hb (Classical.choose_spec (⟨b, Hb⟩ : BddAbove s)) Hinh).symm
@[simp]
theorem csSup_empty : sSup (∅ : Set ℤ) = 0 :=
dif_neg (by simp)
theorem csSup_of_not_bdd_above {s : Set ℤ} (h : ¬BddAbove s) : sSup s = 0 :=
dif_neg (by simp [h])
theorem csInf_eq_least_of_bdd {s : Set ℤ} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (b : ℤ) (Hb : ∀ z ∈ s, b ≤ z)
(Hinh : ∃ z : ℤ, z ∈ s) : sInf s = leastOfBdd b Hb Hinh := by
have : s.Nonempty ∧ BddBelow s := ⟨Hinh, b, Hb⟩
simp only [sInf, dif_pos this]
convert (coe_leastOfBdd_eq Hb (Classical.choose_spec (⟨b, Hb⟩ : BddBelow s)) Hinh).symm
@[simp]
theorem csInf_empty : sInf (∅ : Set ℤ) = 0 :=
dif_neg (by simp)
theorem csInf_of_not_bdd_below {s : Set ℤ} (h : ¬BddBelow s) : sInf s = 0 :=
dif_neg (by simp [h])
theorem csSup_mem {s : Set ℤ} (h1 : s.Nonempty) (h2 : BddAbove s) : sSup s ∈ s := by
convert (greatestOfBdd _ (Classical.choose_spec h2) h1).2.1
exact dif_pos ⟨h1, h2⟩
theorem csInf_mem {s : Set ℤ} (h1 : s.Nonempty) (h2 : BddBelow s) : sInf s ∈ s := by
convert (leastOfBdd _ (Classical.choose_spec h2) h1).2.1
exact dif_pos ⟨h1, h2⟩
end Int
| end
| Mathlib/Data/Int/ConditionallyCompleteOrder.lean | 90 | 91 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot, Casper Putz, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.GeneralLinearGroup.Defs
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Nondegenerate
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.NonsingularInverse
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.ToLin
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.FractionRing
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Integer
/-!
# Matrices and linear equivalences
This file gives the map `Matrix.toLinearEquiv` from matrices with invertible determinant,
to linear equivs.
## Main definitions
* `Matrix.toLinearEquiv`: a matrix with an invertible determinant forms a linear equiv
## Main results
* `Matrix.exists_mulVec_eq_zero_iff`: `M` maps some `v ≠ 0` to zero iff `det M = 0`
## Tags
matrix, linear_equiv, determinant, inverse
-/
variable {n : Type*} [Fintype n]
namespace Matrix
section LinearEquiv
open LinearMap
variable {R M : Type*} [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
section ToLinearEquiv'
variable [DecidableEq n]
/-- An invertible matrix yields a linear equivalence from the free module to itself.
See `Matrix.toLinearEquiv` for the same map on arbitrary modules.
-/
def toLinearEquiv' (P : Matrix n n R) (_ : Invertible P) : (n → R) ≃ₗ[R] n → R :=
GeneralLinearGroup.generalLinearEquiv _ _ <|
Matrix.GeneralLinearGroup.toLin <| unitOfInvertible P
@[simp]
theorem toLinearEquiv'_apply (P : Matrix n n R) (h : Invertible P) :
(P.toLinearEquiv' h : Module.End R (n → R)) = Matrix.toLin' P :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toLinearEquiv'_symm_apply (P : Matrix n n R) (h : Invertible P) :
(↑(P.toLinearEquiv' h).symm : Module.End R (n → R)) = Matrix.toLin' (⅟ P) :=
rfl
end ToLinearEquiv'
section ToLinearEquiv
variable (b : Basis n R M)
/-- Given `hA : IsUnit A.det` and `b : Basis R b`, `A.toLinearEquiv b hA` is
the `LinearEquiv` arising from `toLin b b A`.
See `Matrix.toLinearEquiv'` for this result on `n → R`.
-/
@[simps apply]
noncomputable def toLinearEquiv [DecidableEq n] (A : Matrix n n R) (hA : IsUnit A.det) :
M ≃ₗ[R] M where
__ := toLin b b A
toFun := toLin b b A
invFun := toLin b b A⁻¹
left_inv x := by
simp_rw [← LinearMap.comp_apply, ← Matrix.toLin_mul b b b, Matrix.nonsing_inv_mul _ hA,
toLin_one, LinearMap.id_apply]
right_inv x := by
simp_rw [← LinearMap.comp_apply, ← Matrix.toLin_mul b b b, Matrix.mul_nonsing_inv _ hA,
toLin_one, LinearMap.id_apply]
theorem ker_toLin_eq_bot [DecidableEq n] (A : Matrix n n R) (hA : IsUnit A.det) :
LinearMap.ker (toLin b b A) = ⊥ :=
ker_eq_bot.mpr (toLinearEquiv b A hA).injective
theorem range_toLin_eq_top [DecidableEq n] (A : Matrix n n R) (hA : IsUnit A.det) :
LinearMap.range (toLin b b A) = ⊤ :=
range_eq_top.mpr (toLinearEquiv b A hA).surjective
end ToLinearEquiv
section Nondegenerate
open Matrix
/-- This holds for all integral domains (see `Matrix.exists_mulVec_eq_zero_iff`),
not just fields, but it's easier to prove it for the field of fractions first. -/
theorem exists_mulVec_eq_zero_iff_aux {K : Type*} [DecidableEq n] [Field K] {M : Matrix n n K} :
(∃ v ≠ 0, M *ᵥ v = 0) ↔ M.det = 0 := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨v, hv, mul_eq⟩
contrapose! hv
exact eq_zero_of_mulVec_eq_zero hv mul_eq
· contrapose!
intro h
have : Function.Injective (Matrix.toLin' M) := by
simpa only [← LinearMap.ker_eq_bot, ker_toLin'_eq_bot_iff, not_imp_not] using h
have :
M *
LinearMap.toMatrix'
((LinearEquiv.ofInjectiveEndo (Matrix.toLin' M) this).symm : (n → K) →ₗ[K] n → K) =
1 := by
refine Matrix.toLin'.injective (LinearMap.ext fun v => ?_)
rw [Matrix.toLin'_mul, Matrix.toLin'_one, Matrix.toLin'_toMatrix', LinearMap.comp_apply]
exact (LinearEquiv.ofInjectiveEndo (Matrix.toLin' M) this).apply_symm_apply v
exact Matrix.det_ne_zero_of_right_inverse this
theorem exists_mulVec_eq_zero_iff' {A : Type*} (K : Type*) [DecidableEq n] [CommRing A]
[Nontrivial A] [Field K] [Algebra A K] [IsFractionRing A K] {M : Matrix n n A} :
(∃ v ≠ 0, M *ᵥ v = 0) ↔ M.det = 0 := by
have : (∃ v ≠ 0, (algebraMap A K).mapMatrix M *ᵥ v = 0) ↔ _ :=
exists_mulVec_eq_zero_iff_aux
rw [← RingHom.map_det, IsFractionRing.to_map_eq_zero_iff] at this
refine Iff.trans ?_ this; constructor <;> rintro ⟨v, hv, mul_eq⟩
· refine ⟨fun i => algebraMap _ _ (v i), mt (fun h => funext fun i => ?_) hv, ?_⟩
· exact IsFractionRing.to_map_eq_zero_iff.mp (congr_fun h i)
· ext i
refine (RingHom.map_mulVec _ _ _ i).symm.trans ?_
rw [mul_eq, Pi.zero_apply, RingHom.map_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
· letI := Classical.decEq K
obtain ⟨⟨b, hb⟩, ba_eq⟩ :=
IsLocalization.exist_integer_multiples_of_finset (nonZeroDivisors A) (Finset.univ.image v)
choose f hf using ba_eq
refine
⟨fun i => f _ (Finset.mem_image.mpr ⟨i, Finset.mem_univ i, rfl⟩),
mt (fun h => funext fun i => ?_) hv, ?_⟩
· have := congr_arg (algebraMap A K) (congr_fun h i)
rw [hf, Subtype.coe_mk, Pi.zero_apply, RingHom.map_zero, Algebra.smul_def, mul_eq_zero,
IsFractionRing.to_map_eq_zero_iff] at this
exact this.resolve_left (nonZeroDivisors.ne_zero hb)
· ext i
refine IsFractionRing.injective A K ?_
calc
algebraMap A K ((M *ᵥ (fun i : n => f (v i) _)) i) =
((algebraMap A K).mapMatrix M *ᵥ algebraMap _ K b • v) i := ?_
_ = 0 := ?_
_ = algebraMap A K 0 := (RingHom.map_zero _).symm
· simp_rw [RingHom.map_mulVec, mulVec, dotProduct, Function.comp_apply, hf,
RingHom.mapMatrix_apply, Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, Algebra.smul_def]
· rw [mulVec_smul, mul_eq, Pi.smul_apply, Pi.zero_apply, smul_zero]
theorem exists_mulVec_eq_zero_iff {A : Type*} [DecidableEq n] [CommRing A] [IsDomain A]
{M : Matrix n n A} : (∃ v ≠ 0, M *ᵥ v = 0) ↔ M.det = 0 :=
exists_mulVec_eq_zero_iff' (FractionRing A)
theorem exists_vecMul_eq_zero_iff {A : Type*} [DecidableEq n] [CommRing A] [IsDomain A]
{M : Matrix n n A} : (∃ v ≠ 0, v ᵥ* M = 0) ↔ M.det = 0 := by
simpa only [← M.det_transpose, ← mulVec_transpose] using exists_mulVec_eq_zero_iff
theorem nondegenerate_iff_det_ne_zero {A : Type*} [DecidableEq n] [CommRing A] [IsDomain A]
{M : Matrix n n A} : Nondegenerate M ↔ M.det ≠ 0 := by
rw [ne_eq, ← exists_vecMul_eq_zero_iff]
push_neg
constructor
· intro hM v hv hMv
obtain ⟨w, hwMv⟩ := hM.exists_not_ortho_of_ne_zero hv
simp [dotProduct_mulVec, hMv, zero_dotProduct, ne_eq, not_true] at hwMv
· intro h v hv
refine not_imp_not.mp (h v) (funext fun i => ?_)
simpa only [dotProduct_mulVec, dotProduct_single, mul_one] using hv (Pi.single i 1)
alias ⟨Nondegenerate.det_ne_zero, Nondegenerate.of_det_ne_zero⟩ := nondegenerate_iff_det_ne_zero
end Nondegenerate
end LinearEquiv
section Determinant
/-- A matrix whose nondiagonal entries are negative with the sum of the entries of each
column positive has nonzero determinant. -/
lemma det_ne_zero_of_sum_col_pos [DecidableEq n]
{S : Type*} [CommRing S] [LinearOrder S] [IsStrictOrderedRing S]
{A : Matrix n n S} (h1 : Pairwise fun i j => A i j < 0) (h2 : ∀ j, 0 < ∑ i, A i j) :
A.det ≠ 0 := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty n
· simp
· contrapose! h2
obtain ⟨v, ⟨h_vnz, h_vA⟩⟩ := Matrix.exists_vecMul_eq_zero_iff.mpr h2
wlog h_sup : 0 < Finset.sup' Finset.univ Finset.univ_nonempty v
· refine this h1 inferInstance h2 (-1 • v) ?_ ?_ ?_
· exact smul_ne_zero (by norm_num) h_vnz
· rw [Matrix.vecMul_smul, h_vA, smul_zero]
· obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := Function.ne_iff.mp h_vnz
simp_rw [Finset.lt_sup'_iff, Finset.mem_univ, true_and] at h_sup ⊢
| simp_rw [not_exists, not_lt] at h_sup
refine ⟨i, ?_⟩
rw [Pi.smul_apply, neg_smul, one_smul, Left.neg_pos_iff]
exact Ne.lt_of_le hi (h_sup i)
· obtain ⟨j₀, -, h_j₀⟩ := Finset.exists_mem_eq_sup' Finset.univ_nonempty v
refine ⟨j₀, ?_⟩
rw [← mul_le_mul_left (h_j₀ ▸ h_sup), Finset.mul_sum, mul_zero]
rw [show 0 = ∑ i, v i * A i j₀ from (congrFun h_vA j₀).symm]
refine Finset.sum_le_sum (fun i hi => ?_)
by_cases h : i = j₀
· rw [h]
· exact (mul_le_mul_right_of_neg (h1 h)).mpr (h_j₀ ▸ Finset.le_sup' v hi)
/-- A matrix whose nondiagonal entries are negative with the sum of the entries of each
row positive has nonzero determinant. -/
lemma det_ne_zero_of_sum_row_pos [DecidableEq n]
{S : Type*} [CommRing S] [LinearOrder S] [IsStrictOrderedRing S]
{A : Matrix n n S} (h1 : Pairwise fun i j => A i j < 0) (h2 : ∀ i, 0 < ∑ j, A i j) :
A.det ≠ 0 := by
rw [← Matrix.det_transpose]
refine det_ne_zero_of_sum_col_pos ?_ ?_
· simp_rw [Matrix.transpose_apply]
exact fun i j h => h1 h.symm
· simp_rw [Matrix.transpose_apply]
exact h2
end Determinant
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/ToLinearEquiv.lean | 203 | 229 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.CauchyIntegral
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Convex
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Extr
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.FiniteDimensional
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.ExtrClosure
/-!
# Maximum modulus principle
In this file we prove several versions of the maximum modulus principle. There are several
statements that can be called "the maximum modulus principle" for maps between normed complex
spaces. They differ by assumptions on the domain (any space, a nontrivial space, a finite
dimensional space), assumptions on the codomain (any space, a strictly convex space), and by
conclusion (either equality of norms or of the values of the function).
## Main results
### Theorems for any codomain
Consider a function `f : E → F` that is complex differentiable on a set `s`, is continuous on its
closure, and `‖f x‖` has a maximum on `s` at `c`. We prove the following theorems.
- `Complex.norm_eqOn_closedBall_of_isMaxOn`: if `s = Metric.ball c r`, then `‖f x‖ = ‖f c‖` for
any `x` from the corresponding closed ball;
- `Complex.norm_eq_norm_of_isMaxOn_of_ball_subset`: if `Metric.ball c (dist w c) ⊆ s`, then
`‖f w‖ = ‖f c‖`;
- `Complex.norm_eqOn_of_isPreconnected_of_isMaxOn`: if `U` is an open (pre)connected set, `f` is
complex differentiable on `U`, and `‖f x‖` has a maximum on `U` at `c ∈ U`, then `‖f x‖ = ‖f c‖`
for all `x ∈ U`;
- `Complex.norm_eqOn_closure_of_isPreconnected_of_isMaxOn`: if `s` is open and (pre)connected
and `c ∈ s`, then `‖f x‖ = ‖f c‖` for all `x ∈ closure s`;
- `Complex.norm_eventually_eq_of_isLocalMax`: if `f` is complex differentiable in a neighborhood
of `c` and `‖f x‖` has a local maximum at `c`, then `‖f x‖` is locally a constant in a
neighborhood of `c`.
### Theorems for a strictly convex codomain
If the codomain `F` is a strictly convex space, then in the lemmas from the previous section we can
prove `f w = f c` instead of `‖f w‖ = ‖f c‖`, see
`Complex.eqOn_of_isPreconnected_of_isMaxOn_norm`,
`Complex.eqOn_closure_of_isPreconnected_of_isMaxOn_norm`,
`Complex.eq_of_isMaxOn_of_ball_subset`, `Complex.eqOn_closedBall_of_isMaxOn_norm`, and
`Complex.eventually_eq_of_isLocalMax_norm`.
### Values on the frontier
Finally, we prove some corollaries that relate the (norm of the) values of a function on a set to
its values on the frontier of the set. All these lemmas assume that `E` is a nontrivial space. In
this section `f g : E → F` are functions that are complex differentiable on a bounded set `s` and
are continuous on its closure. We prove the following theorems.
- `Complex.exists_mem_frontier_isMaxOn_norm`: If `E` is a finite dimensional space and `s` is a
nonempty bounded set, then there exists a point `z ∈ frontier s` such that `(‖f ·‖)` takes it
maximum value on `closure s` at `z`.
- `Complex.norm_le_of_forall_mem_frontier_norm_le`: if `‖f z‖ ≤ C` for all `z ∈ frontier s`, then
`‖f z‖ ≤ C` for all `z ∈ s`; note that this theorem does not require `E` to be a finite
dimensional space.
- `Complex.eqOn_closure_of_eqOn_frontier`: if `f x = g x` on the frontier of `s`, then `f x = g x`
on `closure s`;
- `Complex.eqOn_of_eqOn_frontier`: if `f x = g x` on the frontier of `s`, then `f x = g x`
on `s`.
## Tags
maximum modulus principle, complex analysis
-/
open TopologicalSpace Metric Set Filter Asymptotics Function MeasureTheory AffineMap Bornology
open scoped Topology Filter NNReal Real
universe u v w
variable {E : Type u} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E] {F : Type v} [NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace ℂ F]
local postfix:100 "̂" => UniformSpace.Completion
namespace Complex
/-!
### Auxiliary lemmas
We split the proof into a series of lemmas. First we prove the principle for a function `f : ℂ → F`
with an additional assumption that `F` is a complete space, then drop unneeded assumptions one by
one.
The lemmas with names `*_auxₙ` are considered to be private and should not be used outside of this
file.
-/
theorem norm_max_aux₁ [CompleteSpace F] {f : ℂ → F} {z w : ℂ}
(hd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (ball z (dist w z)))
(hz : IsMaxOn (norm ∘ f) (closedBall z (dist w z)) z) : ‖f w‖ = ‖f z‖ := by
-- Consider a circle of radius `r = dist w z`.
set r : ℝ := dist w z
have hw : w ∈ closedBall z r := mem_closedBall.2 le_rfl
-- Assume the converse. Since `‖f w‖ ≤ ‖f z‖`, we have `‖f w‖ < ‖f z‖`.
refine (isMaxOn_iff.1 hz _ hw).antisymm (not_lt.1 ?_)
rintro hw_lt : ‖f w‖ < ‖f z‖
have hr : 0 < r := dist_pos.2 (ne_of_apply_ne (norm ∘ f) hw_lt.ne)
-- Due to Cauchy integral formula, it suffices to prove the following inequality.
suffices ‖∮ ζ in C(z, r), (ζ - z)⁻¹ • f ζ‖ < 2 * π * ‖f z‖ by
refine this.ne ?_
have A : (∮ ζ in C(z, r), (ζ - z)⁻¹ • f ζ) = (2 * π * I : ℂ) • f z :=
hd.circleIntegral_sub_inv_smul (mem_ball_self hr)
simp [A, norm_smul, Real.pi_pos.le]
suffices ‖∮ ζ in C(z, r), (ζ - z)⁻¹ • f ζ‖ < 2 * π * r * (‖f z‖ / r) by
rwa [mul_assoc, mul_div_cancel₀ _ hr.ne'] at this
/- This inequality is true because `‖(ζ - z)⁻¹ • f ζ‖ ≤ ‖f z‖ / r` for all `ζ` on the circle and
this inequality is strict at `ζ = w`. -/
have hsub : sphere z r ⊆ closedBall z r := sphere_subset_closedBall
refine circleIntegral.norm_integral_lt_of_norm_le_const_of_lt hr ?_ ?_ ⟨w, rfl, ?_⟩
· show ContinuousOn (fun ζ : ℂ => (ζ - z)⁻¹ • f ζ) (sphere z r)
refine ((continuousOn_id.sub continuousOn_const).inv₀ ?_).smul (hd.continuousOn_ball.mono hsub)
exact fun ζ hζ => sub_ne_zero.2 (ne_of_mem_sphere hζ hr.ne')
· show ∀ ζ ∈ sphere z r, ‖(ζ - z)⁻¹ • f ζ‖ ≤ ‖f z‖ / r
rintro ζ (hζ : ‖ζ - z‖ = r)
rw [le_div_iff₀ hr, norm_smul, norm_inv, hζ, mul_comm, mul_inv_cancel_left₀ hr.ne']
exact hz (hsub hζ)
show ‖(w - z)⁻¹ • f w‖ < ‖f z‖ / r
rw [norm_smul, norm_inv, ← div_eq_inv_mul]
exact (div_lt_div_iff_of_pos_right hr).2 hw_lt
/-!
Now we drop the assumption `CompleteSpace F` by embedding `F` into its completion.
-/
theorem norm_max_aux₂ {f : ℂ → F} {z w : ℂ} (hd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (ball z (dist w z)))
(hz : IsMaxOn (norm ∘ f) (closedBall z (dist w z)) z) : ‖f w‖ = ‖f z‖ := by
set e : F →L[ℂ] F̂ := UniformSpace.Completion.toComplL
have he : ∀ x, ‖e x‖ = ‖x‖ := UniformSpace.Completion.norm_coe
replace hz : IsMaxOn (norm ∘ e ∘ f) (closedBall z (dist w z)) z := by
simpa only [IsMaxOn, Function.comp_def, he] using hz
simpa only [he, Function.comp_def]
using norm_max_aux₁ (e.differentiable.comp_diffContOnCl hd) hz
/-!
Then we replace the assumption `IsMaxOn (norm ∘ f) (Metric.closedBall z r) z` with a seemingly
weaker assumption `IsMaxOn (norm ∘ f) (Metric.ball z r) z`.
-/
theorem norm_max_aux₃ {f : ℂ → F} {z w : ℂ} {r : ℝ} (hr : dist w z = r)
(hd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (ball z r)) (hz : IsMaxOn (norm ∘ f) (ball z r) z) : ‖f w‖ = ‖f z‖ := by
subst r
rcases eq_or_ne w z with (rfl | hne); · rfl
rw [← dist_ne_zero] at hne
exact norm_max_aux₂ hd (closure_ball z hne ▸ hz.closure hd.continuousOn.norm)
/-!
### Maximum modulus principle for any codomain
If we do not assume that the codomain is a strictly convex space, then we can only claim that the
**norm** `‖f x‖` is locally constant.
-/
/-!
Finally, we generalize the theorem from a disk in `ℂ` to a closed ball in any normed space.
-/
/-- **Maximum modulus principle** on a closed ball: if `f : E → F` is continuous on a closed ball,
is complex differentiable on the corresponding open ball, and the norm `‖f w‖` takes its maximum
value on the open ball at its center, then the norm `‖f w‖` is constant on the closed ball. -/
theorem norm_eqOn_closedBall_of_isMaxOn {f : E → F} {z : E} {r : ℝ}
(hd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (ball z r)) (hz : IsMaxOn (norm ∘ f) (ball z r) z) :
EqOn (norm ∘ f) (const E ‖f z‖) (closedBall z r) := by
intro w hw
| rw [mem_closedBall, dist_comm] at hw
rcases eq_or_ne z w with (rfl | hne); · rfl
set e := (lineMap z w : ℂ → E)
have hde : Differentiable ℂ e := (differentiable_id.smul_const (w - z)).add_const z
suffices ‖(f ∘ e) (1 : ℂ)‖ = ‖(f ∘ e) (0 : ℂ)‖ by simpa [e]
have hr : dist (1 : ℂ) 0 = 1 := by simp
have hball : MapsTo e (ball 0 1) (ball z r) := by
refine ((lipschitzWith_lineMap z w).mapsTo_ball (mt nndist_eq_zero.1 hne) 0 1).mono
Subset.rfl ?_
simpa only [lineMap_apply_zero, mul_one, coe_nndist] using ball_subset_ball hw
exact norm_max_aux₃ hr (hd.comp hde.diffContOnCl hball)
(hz.comp_mapsTo hball (lineMap_apply_zero z w))
/-- **Maximum modulus principle**: if `f : E → F` is complex differentiable on a set `s`, the norm
of `f` takes it maximum on `s` at `z`, and `w` is a point such that the closed ball with center `z`
and radius `dist w z` is included in `s`, then `‖f w‖ = ‖f z‖`. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/AbsMax.lean | 181 | 196 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Kevin Kappelmann
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Floor.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Floor.Ring
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Floor.Semiring
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Floor.lean | 369 | 373 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Ashvni Narayanan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Ashvni Narayanan, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Derivative
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Cast
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Bernoulli
/-!
# Bernoulli polynomials
The [Bernoulli polynomials](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernoulli_polynomials)
are an important tool obtained from Bernoulli numbers.
## Mathematical overview
The $n$-th Bernoulli polynomial is defined as
$$ B_n(X) = ∑_{k = 0}^n {n \choose k} (-1)^k B_k X^{n - k} $$
where $B_k$ is the $k$-th Bernoulli number. The Bernoulli polynomials are generating functions,
$$ \frac{t e^{tX} }{ e^t - 1} = ∑_{n = 0}^{\infty} B_n(X) \frac{t^n}{n!} $$
## Implementation detail
Bernoulli polynomials are defined using `bernoulli`, the Bernoulli numbers.
## Main theorems
- `sum_bernoulli`: The sum of the $k^\mathrm{th}$ Bernoulli polynomial with binomial
coefficients up to `n` is `(n + 1) * X^n`.
- `Polynomial.bernoulli_generating_function`: The Bernoulli polynomials act as generating functions
for the exponential.
## TODO
- `bernoulli_eval_one_neg` : $$ B_n(1 - x) = (-1)^n B_n(x) $$
-/
noncomputable section
open Nat Polynomial
open Nat Finset
namespace Polynomial
/-- The Bernoulli polynomials are defined in terms of the negative Bernoulli numbers. -/
def bernoulli (n : ℕ) : ℚ[X] :=
∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), Polynomial.monomial (n - i) (_root_.bernoulli i * choose n i)
theorem bernoulli_def (n : ℕ) : bernoulli n =
∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), Polynomial.monomial i (_root_.bernoulli (n - i) * choose n i) := by
rw [← sum_range_reflect, add_succ_sub_one, add_zero, bernoulli]
apply sum_congr rfl
rintro x hx
rw [mem_range_succ_iff] at hx
rw [choose_symm hx, tsub_tsub_cancel_of_le hx]
/-
### examples
-/
section Examples
@[simp]
theorem bernoulli_zero : bernoulli 0 = 1 := by simp [bernoulli]
@[simp]
theorem bernoulli_eval_zero (n : ℕ) : (bernoulli n).eval 0 = _root_.bernoulli n := by
rw [bernoulli, eval_finset_sum, sum_range_succ]
have : ∑ x ∈ range n, _root_.bernoulli x * n.choose x * 0 ^ (n - x) = 0 := by
apply sum_eq_zero fun x hx => _
intros x hx
simp [tsub_eq_zero_iff_le, mem_range.1 hx]
simp [this]
@[simp]
theorem bernoulli_eval_one (n : ℕ) : (bernoulli n).eval 1 = bernoulli' n := by
simp only [bernoulli, eval_finset_sum]
simp only [← succ_eq_add_one, sum_range_succ, mul_one, cast_one, choose_self,
(_root_.bernoulli _).mul_comm, sum_bernoulli, one_pow, mul_one, eval_C, eval_monomial, one_mul]
by_cases h : n = 1
· norm_num [h]
· simp [h, bernoulli_eq_bernoulli'_of_ne_one h]
end Examples
theorem derivative_bernoulli_add_one (k : ℕ) :
Polynomial.derivative (bernoulli (k + 1)) = (k + 1) * bernoulli k := by
simp_rw [bernoulli, derivative_sum, derivative_monomial, Nat.sub_sub, Nat.add_sub_add_right]
-- LHS sum has an extra term, but the coefficient is zero:
rw [range_add_one, sum_insert not_mem_range_self, tsub_self, cast_zero, mul_zero,
map_zero, zero_add, mul_sum]
-- the rest of the sum is termwise equal:
refine sum_congr (by rfl) fun m _ => ?_
conv_rhs => rw [← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, ← C_eq_natCast, C_mul_monomial, mul_comm]
rw [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, ← Nat.cast_mul, ← Nat.cast_mul]
congr 3
rw [(choose_mul_succ_eq k m).symm]
theorem derivative_bernoulli (k : ℕ) :
Polynomial.derivative (bernoulli k) = k * bernoulli (k - 1) := by
cases k with
| zero => rw [Nat.cast_zero, zero_mul, bernoulli_zero, derivative_one]
| succ k => exact mod_cast derivative_bernoulli_add_one k
@[simp]
nonrec theorem sum_bernoulli (n : ℕ) :
(∑ k ∈ range (n + 1), ((n + 1).choose k : ℚ) • bernoulli k) = monomial n (n + 1 : ℚ) := by
simp_rw [bernoulli_def, Finset.smul_sum, Finset.range_eq_Ico, ← Finset.sum_Ico_Ico_comm,
Finset.sum_Ico_eq_sum_range]
simp only [add_tsub_cancel_left, tsub_zero, zero_add, map_add]
simp_rw [smul_monomial, mul_comm (_root_.bernoulli _) _, smul_eq_mul, ← mul_assoc]
conv_lhs =>
apply_congr
· skip
· conv =>
apply_congr
· skip
· rw [← Nat.cast_mul, choose_mul ((le_tsub_iff_left <| mem_range_le (by assumption)).1 <|
mem_range_le (by assumption)) (le.intro rfl),
Nat.cast_mul, add_tsub_cancel_left, mul_assoc, mul_comm, ← smul_eq_mul, ←
smul_monomial]
simp_rw [← sum_smul]
rw [sum_range_succ_comm]
simp only [add_eq_left, mul_one, cast_one, cast_add, add_tsub_cancel_left,
choose_succ_self_right, one_smul, _root_.bernoulli_zero, sum_singleton, zero_add,
map_add, range_one, bernoulli_zero, mul_one, one_mul, add_zero, choose_self]
apply sum_eq_zero fun x hx => _
have f : ∀ x ∈ range n, ¬n + 1 - x = 1 := by
rintro x H
rw [mem_range] at H
rw [eq_comm]
exact _root_.ne_of_lt (Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le one_lt_two (le_tsub_of_add_le_left (succ_le_succ H)))
intro x hx
rw [sum_bernoulli]
have g : ite (n + 1 - x = 1) (1 : ℚ) 0 = 0 := by
simp only [ite_eq_right_iff, one_ne_zero]
intro h₁
exact (f x hx) h₁
rw [g, zero_smul]
/-- Another version of `Polynomial.sum_bernoulli`. -/
theorem bernoulli_eq_sub_sum (n : ℕ) :
(n.succ : ℚ) • bernoulli n =
monomial n (n.succ : ℚ) - ∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, ((n + 1).choose k : ℚ) • bernoulli k := by
rw [Nat.cast_succ, ← sum_bernoulli n, sum_range_succ, add_sub_cancel_left, choose_succ_self_right,
Nat.cast_succ]
/-- Another version of `sum_range_pow`. -/
theorem sum_range_pow_eq_bernoulli_sub (n p : ℕ) :
((p + 1 : ℚ) * ∑ k ∈ range n, (k : ℚ) ^ p) = (bernoulli p.succ).eval (n : ℚ) -
_root_.bernoulli p.succ := by
| rw [sum_range_pow, bernoulli_def, eval_finset_sum, ← sum_div, mul_div_cancel₀ _ _]
· simp_rw [eval_monomial]
symm
rw [← sum_flip _, sum_range_succ]
simp only [tsub_self, tsub_zero, choose_zero_right, cast_one, mul_one, _root_.pow_zero,
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/BernoulliPolynomials.lean | 156 | 160 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Bases.Finite
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Monoid
import Mathlib.Topology.Homeomorph.Lemmas
/-!
# Topological groups
This file defines the following typeclasses:
* `IsTopologicalGroup`, `IsTopologicalAddGroup`: multiplicative and additive topological groups,
i.e., groups with continuous `(*)` and `(⁻¹)` / `(+)` and `(-)`;
* `ContinuousSub G` means that `G` has a continuous subtraction operation.
There is an instance deducing `ContinuousSub` from `IsTopologicalGroup` but we use a separate
typeclass because, e.g., `ℕ` and `ℝ≥0` have continuous subtraction but are not additive groups.
We also define `Homeomorph` versions of several `Equiv`s: `Homeomorph.mulLeft`,
`Homeomorph.mulRight`, `Homeomorph.inv`, and prove a few facts about neighbourhood filters in
groups.
## Tags
topological space, group, topological group
-/
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Function Topology MulOpposite Pointwise
universe u v w x
variable {G : Type w} {H : Type x} {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
section ContinuousMulGroup
/-!
### Groups with continuous multiplication
In this section we prove a few statements about groups with continuous `(*)`.
-/
variable [TopologicalSpace G] [Group G] [ContinuousMul G]
/-- Multiplication from the left in a topological group as a homeomorphism. -/
@[to_additive "Addition from the left in a topological additive group as a homeomorphism."]
protected def Homeomorph.mulLeft (a : G) : G ≃ₜ G :=
{ Equiv.mulLeft a with
continuous_toFun := continuous_const.mul continuous_id
continuous_invFun := continuous_const.mul continuous_id }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Homeomorph.coe_mulLeft (a : G) : ⇑(Homeomorph.mulLeft a) = (a * ·) :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem Homeomorph.mulLeft_symm (a : G) : (Homeomorph.mulLeft a).symm = Homeomorph.mulLeft a⁻¹ := by
ext
rfl
@[to_additive]
lemma isOpenMap_mul_left (a : G) : IsOpenMap (a * ·) := (Homeomorph.mulLeft a).isOpenMap
@[to_additive IsOpen.left_addCoset]
theorem IsOpen.leftCoset {U : Set G} (h : IsOpen U) (x : G) : IsOpen (x • U) :=
isOpenMap_mul_left x _ h
@[to_additive]
lemma isClosedMap_mul_left (a : G) : IsClosedMap (a * ·) := (Homeomorph.mulLeft a).isClosedMap
@[to_additive IsClosed.left_addCoset]
theorem IsClosed.leftCoset {U : Set G} (h : IsClosed U) (x : G) : IsClosed (x • U) :=
isClosedMap_mul_left x _ h
/-- Multiplication from the right in a topological group as a homeomorphism. -/
@[to_additive "Addition from the right in a topological additive group as a homeomorphism."]
protected def Homeomorph.mulRight (a : G) : G ≃ₜ G :=
{ Equiv.mulRight a with
continuous_toFun := continuous_id.mul continuous_const
continuous_invFun := continuous_id.mul continuous_const }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma Homeomorph.coe_mulRight (a : G) : ⇑(Homeomorph.mulRight a) = (· * a) := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem Homeomorph.mulRight_symm (a : G) :
(Homeomorph.mulRight a).symm = Homeomorph.mulRight a⁻¹ := by
ext
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem isOpenMap_mul_right (a : G) : IsOpenMap (· * a) :=
(Homeomorph.mulRight a).isOpenMap
@[to_additive IsOpen.right_addCoset]
theorem IsOpen.rightCoset {U : Set G} (h : IsOpen U) (x : G) : IsOpen (op x • U) :=
isOpenMap_mul_right x _ h
@[to_additive]
theorem isClosedMap_mul_right (a : G) : IsClosedMap (· * a) :=
(Homeomorph.mulRight a).isClosedMap
@[to_additive IsClosed.right_addCoset]
theorem IsClosed.rightCoset {U : Set G} (h : IsClosed U) (x : G) : IsClosed (op x • U) :=
isClosedMap_mul_right x _ h
@[to_additive]
theorem discreteTopology_of_isOpen_singleton_one (h : IsOpen ({1} : Set G)) :
DiscreteTopology G := by
rw [← singletons_open_iff_discrete]
intro g
suffices {g} = (g⁻¹ * ·) ⁻¹' {1} by
rw [this]
exact (continuous_mul_left g⁻¹).isOpen_preimage _ h
simp only [mul_one, Set.preimage_mul_left_singleton, eq_self_iff_true, inv_inv,
Set.singleton_eq_singleton_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem discreteTopology_iff_isOpen_singleton_one : DiscreteTopology G ↔ IsOpen ({1} : Set G) :=
⟨fun h => forall_open_iff_discrete.mpr h {1}, discreteTopology_of_isOpen_singleton_one⟩
end ContinuousMulGroup
/-!
### `ContinuousInv` and `ContinuousNeg`
-/
section ContinuousInv
variable [TopologicalSpace G] [Inv G] [ContinuousInv G]
@[to_additive]
theorem ContinuousInv.induced {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {F : Type*} [FunLike F α β] [Group α]
[DivisionMonoid β] [MonoidHomClass F α β] [tβ : TopologicalSpace β] [ContinuousInv β] (f : F) :
@ContinuousInv α (tβ.induced f) _ := by
let _tα := tβ.induced f
refine ⟨continuous_induced_rng.2 ?_⟩
simp only [Function.comp_def, map_inv]
fun_prop
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Specializes.inv {x y : G} (h : x ⤳ y) : (x⁻¹) ⤳ (y⁻¹) :=
h.map continuous_inv
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Inseparable.inv {x y : G} (h : Inseparable x y) : Inseparable (x⁻¹) (y⁻¹) :=
h.map continuous_inv
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Specializes.zpow {G : Type*} [DivInvMonoid G] [TopologicalSpace G]
[ContinuousMul G] [ContinuousInv G] {x y : G} (h : x ⤳ y) : ∀ m : ℤ, (x ^ m) ⤳ (y ^ m)
| .ofNat n => by simpa using h.pow n
| .negSucc n => by simpa using (h.pow (n + 1)).inv
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Inseparable.zpow {G : Type*} [DivInvMonoid G] [TopologicalSpace G]
[ContinuousMul G] [ContinuousInv G] {x y : G} (h : Inseparable x y) (m : ℤ) :
Inseparable (x ^ m) (y ^ m) :=
(h.specializes.zpow m).antisymm (h.specializes'.zpow m)
@[to_additive]
instance : ContinuousInv (ULift G) :=
⟨continuous_uliftUp.comp (continuous_inv.comp continuous_uliftDown)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem continuousOn_inv {s : Set G} : ContinuousOn Inv.inv s :=
continuous_inv.continuousOn
@[to_additive]
theorem continuousWithinAt_inv {s : Set G} {x : G} : ContinuousWithinAt Inv.inv s x :=
continuous_inv.continuousWithinAt
@[to_additive]
theorem continuousAt_inv {x : G} : ContinuousAt Inv.inv x :=
continuous_inv.continuousAt
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_inv (a : G) : Tendsto Inv.inv (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a⁻¹) :=
continuousAt_inv
variable [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → G} {s : Set α} {x : α}
@[to_additive]
instance OrderDual.instContinuousInv : ContinuousInv Gᵒᵈ := ‹ContinuousInv G›
@[to_additive]
instance Prod.continuousInv [TopologicalSpace H] [Inv H] [ContinuousInv H] :
ContinuousInv (G × H) :=
⟨continuous_inv.fst'.prodMk continuous_inv.snd'⟩
variable {ι : Type*}
@[to_additive]
instance Pi.continuousInv {C : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (C i)] [∀ i, Inv (C i)]
[∀ i, ContinuousInv (C i)] : ContinuousInv (∀ i, C i) where
continuous_inv := continuous_pi fun i => (continuous_apply i).inv
/-- A version of `Pi.continuousInv` for non-dependent functions. It is needed because sometimes
Lean fails to use `Pi.continuousInv` for non-dependent functions. -/
@[to_additive
"A version of `Pi.continuousNeg` for non-dependent functions. It is needed
because sometimes Lean fails to use `Pi.continuousNeg` for non-dependent functions."]
instance Pi.has_continuous_inv' : ContinuousInv (ι → G) :=
Pi.continuousInv
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) continuousInv_of_discreteTopology [TopologicalSpace H] [Inv H]
[DiscreteTopology H] : ContinuousInv H :=
⟨continuous_of_discreteTopology⟩
section PointwiseLimits
variable (G₁ G₂ : Type*) [TopologicalSpace G₂] [T2Space G₂]
@[to_additive]
theorem isClosed_setOf_map_inv [Inv G₁] [Inv G₂] [ContinuousInv G₂] :
IsClosed { f : G₁ → G₂ | ∀ x, f x⁻¹ = (f x)⁻¹ } := by
simp only [setOf_forall]
exact isClosed_iInter fun i => isClosed_eq (continuous_apply _) (continuous_apply _).inv
end PointwiseLimits
instance [TopologicalSpace H] [Inv H] [ContinuousInv H] : ContinuousNeg (Additive H) where
continuous_neg := @continuous_inv H _ _ _
instance [TopologicalSpace H] [Neg H] [ContinuousNeg H] : ContinuousInv (Multiplicative H) where
continuous_inv := @continuous_neg H _ _ _
end ContinuousInv
section ContinuousInvolutiveInv
variable [TopologicalSpace G] [InvolutiveInv G] [ContinuousInv G] {s : Set G}
@[to_additive]
theorem IsCompact.inv (hs : IsCompact s) : IsCompact s⁻¹ := by
rw [← image_inv_eq_inv]
exact hs.image continuous_inv
variable (G)
/-- Inversion in a topological group as a homeomorphism. -/
@[to_additive "Negation in a topological group as a homeomorphism."]
protected def Homeomorph.inv (G : Type*) [TopologicalSpace G] [InvolutiveInv G]
[ContinuousInv G] : G ≃ₜ G :=
{ Equiv.inv G with
continuous_toFun := continuous_inv
continuous_invFun := continuous_inv }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma Homeomorph.coe_inv {G : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G] [InvolutiveInv G] [ContinuousInv G] :
⇑(Homeomorph.inv G) = Inv.inv := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem nhds_inv (a : G) : 𝓝 a⁻¹ = (𝓝 a)⁻¹ :=
((Homeomorph.inv G).map_nhds_eq a).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem isOpenMap_inv : IsOpenMap (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
(Homeomorph.inv _).isOpenMap
@[to_additive]
theorem isClosedMap_inv : IsClosedMap (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
(Homeomorph.inv _).isClosedMap
variable {G}
@[to_additive]
theorem IsOpen.inv (hs : IsOpen s) : IsOpen s⁻¹ :=
hs.preimage continuous_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem IsClosed.inv (hs : IsClosed s) : IsClosed s⁻¹ :=
hs.preimage continuous_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_closure : ∀ s : Set G, (closure s)⁻¹ = closure s⁻¹ :=
(Homeomorph.inv G).preimage_closure
variable [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → G} {s : Set α} {x : α}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma continuous_inv_iff : Continuous f⁻¹ ↔ Continuous f := (Homeomorph.inv G).comp_continuous_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma continuousAt_inv_iff : ContinuousAt f⁻¹ x ↔ ContinuousAt f x :=
(Homeomorph.inv G).comp_continuousAt_iff _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma continuousOn_inv_iff : ContinuousOn f⁻¹ s ↔ ContinuousOn f s :=
(Homeomorph.inv G).comp_continuousOn_iff _ _
@[to_additive] alias ⟨Continuous.of_inv, _⟩ := continuous_inv_iff
@[to_additive] alias ⟨ContinuousAt.of_inv, _⟩ := continuousAt_inv_iff
@[to_additive] alias ⟨ContinuousOn.of_inv, _⟩ := continuousOn_inv_iff
end ContinuousInvolutiveInv
section LatticeOps
variable {ι' : Sort*} [Inv G]
@[to_additive]
theorem continuousInv_sInf {ts : Set (TopologicalSpace G)}
(h : ∀ t ∈ ts, @ContinuousInv G t _) : @ContinuousInv G (sInf ts) _ :=
letI := sInf ts
{ continuous_inv :=
continuous_sInf_rng.2 fun t ht =>
continuous_sInf_dom ht (@ContinuousInv.continuous_inv G t _ (h t ht)) }
@[to_additive]
theorem continuousInv_iInf {ts' : ι' → TopologicalSpace G}
(h' : ∀ i, @ContinuousInv G (ts' i) _) : @ContinuousInv G (⨅ i, ts' i) _ := by
rw [← sInf_range]
exact continuousInv_sInf (Set.forall_mem_range.mpr h')
@[to_additive]
theorem continuousInv_inf {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace G} (h₁ : @ContinuousInv G t₁ _)
(h₂ : @ContinuousInv G t₂ _) : @ContinuousInv G (t₁ ⊓ t₂) _ := by
rw [inf_eq_iInf]
refine continuousInv_iInf fun b => ?_
cases b <;> assumption
end LatticeOps
@[to_additive]
theorem Topology.IsInducing.continuousInv {G H : Type*} [Inv G] [Inv H] [TopologicalSpace G]
[TopologicalSpace H] [ContinuousInv H] {f : G → H} (hf : IsInducing f)
(hf_inv : ∀ x, f x⁻¹ = (f x)⁻¹) : ContinuousInv G :=
⟨hf.continuous_iff.2 <| by simpa only [Function.comp_def, hf_inv] using hf.continuous.inv⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.continuousInv := IsInducing.continuousInv
section IsTopologicalGroup
/-!
### Topological groups
A topological group is a group in which the multiplication and inversion operations are
continuous. Topological additive groups are defined in the same way. Equivalently, we can require
that the division operation `x y ↦ x * y⁻¹` (resp., subtraction) is continuous.
-/
section Conj
instance ConjAct.units_continuousConstSMul {M} [Monoid M] [TopologicalSpace M]
[ContinuousMul M] : ContinuousConstSMul (ConjAct Mˣ) M :=
⟨fun _ => (continuous_const.mul continuous_id).mul continuous_const⟩
variable [TopologicalSpace G] [Inv G] [Mul G] [ContinuousMul G]
/-- Conjugation is jointly continuous on `G × G` when both `mul` and `inv` are continuous. -/
@[to_additive continuous_addConj_prod
"Conjugation is jointly continuous on `G × G` when both `add` and `neg` are continuous."]
theorem IsTopologicalGroup.continuous_conj_prod [ContinuousInv G] :
Continuous fun g : G × G => g.fst * g.snd * g.fst⁻¹ :=
continuous_mul.mul (continuous_inv.comp continuous_fst)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias IsTopologicalAddGroup.continuous_conj_sum := IsTopologicalAddGroup.continuous_addConj_prod
/-- Conjugation by a fixed element is continuous when `mul` is continuous. -/
@[to_additive (attr := continuity)
"Conjugation by a fixed element is continuous when `add` is continuous."]
theorem IsTopologicalGroup.continuous_conj (g : G) : Continuous fun h : G => g * h * g⁻¹ :=
(continuous_mul_right g⁻¹).comp (continuous_mul_left g)
/-- Conjugation acting on fixed element of the group is continuous when both `mul` and
`inv` are continuous. -/
@[to_additive (attr := continuity)
"Conjugation acting on fixed element of the additive group is continuous when both
`add` and `neg` are continuous."]
theorem IsTopologicalGroup.continuous_conj' [ContinuousInv G] (h : G) :
Continuous fun g : G => g * h * g⁻¹ :=
(continuous_mul_right h).mul continuous_inv
end Conj
variable [TopologicalSpace G] [Group G] [IsTopologicalGroup G] [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → G}
{s : Set α} {x : α}
instance : IsTopologicalGroup (ULift G) where
section ZPow
@[to_additive (attr := continuity, fun_prop)]
theorem continuous_zpow : ∀ z : ℤ, Continuous fun a : G => a ^ z
| Int.ofNat n => by simpa using continuous_pow n
| Int.negSucc n => by simpa using (continuous_pow (n + 1)).inv
instance AddGroup.continuousConstSMul_int {A} [AddGroup A] [TopologicalSpace A]
[IsTopologicalAddGroup A] : ContinuousConstSMul ℤ A :=
⟨continuous_zsmul⟩
instance AddGroup.continuousSMul_int {A} [AddGroup A] [TopologicalSpace A]
[IsTopologicalAddGroup A] : ContinuousSMul ℤ A :=
⟨continuous_prod_of_discrete_left.mpr continuous_zsmul⟩
@[to_additive (attr := continuity, fun_prop)]
theorem Continuous.zpow {f : α → G} (h : Continuous f) (z : ℤ) : Continuous fun b => f b ^ z :=
(continuous_zpow z).comp h
@[to_additive]
theorem continuousOn_zpow {s : Set G} (z : ℤ) : ContinuousOn (fun x => x ^ z) s :=
(continuous_zpow z).continuousOn
@[to_additive]
theorem continuousAt_zpow (x : G) (z : ℤ) : ContinuousAt (fun x => x ^ z) x :=
(continuous_zpow z).continuousAt
@[to_additive]
theorem Filter.Tendsto.zpow {α} {l : Filter α} {f : α → G} {x : G} (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x))
(z : ℤ) : Tendsto (fun x => f x ^ z) l (𝓝 (x ^ z)) :=
(continuousAt_zpow _ _).tendsto.comp hf
@[to_additive]
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.zpow {f : α → G} {x : α} {s : Set α} (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x)
(z : ℤ) : ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => f x ^ z) s x :=
Filter.Tendsto.zpow hf z
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop)]
theorem ContinuousAt.zpow {f : α → G} {x : α} (hf : ContinuousAt f x) (z : ℤ) :
ContinuousAt (fun x => f x ^ z) x :=
Filter.Tendsto.zpow hf z
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop)]
theorem ContinuousOn.zpow {f : α → G} {s : Set α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (z : ℤ) :
ContinuousOn (fun x => f x ^ z) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).zpow z
end ZPow
section OrderedCommGroup
variable [TopologicalSpace H] [CommGroup H] [PartialOrder H] [IsOrderedMonoid H] [ContinuousInv H]
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_inv_nhdsGT {a : H} : Tendsto Inv.inv (𝓝[>] a) (𝓝[<] a⁻¹) :=
(continuous_inv.tendsto a).inf <| by simp [tendsto_principal_principal]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_neg_nhdsWithin_Ioi := tendsto_neg_nhdsGT
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_inv_nhdsWithin_Ioi := tendsto_inv_nhdsGT
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_inv_nhdsLT {a : H} : Tendsto Inv.inv (𝓝[<] a) (𝓝[>] a⁻¹) :=
(continuous_inv.tendsto a).inf <| by simp [tendsto_principal_principal]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_neg_nhdsWithin_Iio := tendsto_neg_nhdsLT
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_inv_nhdsWithin_Iio := tendsto_inv_nhdsLT
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_inv_nhdsGT_inv {a : H} : Tendsto Inv.inv (𝓝[>] a⁻¹) (𝓝[<] a) := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using tendsto_inv_nhdsGT (a := a⁻¹)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_neg_nhdsWithin_Ioi_neg := tendsto_neg_nhdsGT_neg
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_inv_nhdsWithin_Ioi_inv := tendsto_inv_nhdsGT_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_inv_nhdsLT_inv {a : H} : Tendsto Inv.inv (𝓝[<] a⁻¹) (𝓝[>] a) := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using tendsto_inv_nhdsLT (a := a⁻¹)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_neg_nhdsWithin_Iio_neg := tendsto_neg_nhdsLT_neg
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_inv_nhdsWithin_Iio_inv := tendsto_inv_nhdsLT_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_inv_nhdsGE {a : H} : Tendsto Inv.inv (𝓝[≥] a) (𝓝[≤] a⁻¹) :=
(continuous_inv.tendsto a).inf <| by simp [tendsto_principal_principal]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_neg_nhdsWithin_Ici := tendsto_neg_nhdsGE
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_inv_nhdsWithin_Ici := tendsto_inv_nhdsGE
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_inv_nhdsLE {a : H} : Tendsto Inv.inv (𝓝[≤] a) (𝓝[≥] a⁻¹) :=
(continuous_inv.tendsto a).inf <| by simp [tendsto_principal_principal]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_neg_nhdsWithin_Iic := tendsto_neg_nhdsLE
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_inv_nhdsWithin_Iic := tendsto_inv_nhdsLE
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_inv_nhdsGE_inv {a : H} : Tendsto Inv.inv (𝓝[≥] a⁻¹) (𝓝[≤] a) := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using tendsto_inv_nhdsGE (a := a⁻¹)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_neg_nhdsWithin_Ici_neg := tendsto_neg_nhdsGE_neg
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_inv_nhdsWithin_Ici_inv := tendsto_inv_nhdsGE_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_inv_nhdsLE_inv {a : H} : Tendsto Inv.inv (𝓝[≤] a⁻¹) (𝓝[≥] a) := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using tendsto_inv_nhdsLE (a := a⁻¹)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_neg_nhdsWithin_Iic_neg := tendsto_neg_nhdsLE_neg
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_inv_nhdsWithin_Iic_inv := tendsto_inv_nhdsLE_inv
end OrderedCommGroup
@[to_additive]
instance Prod.instIsTopologicalGroup [TopologicalSpace H] [Group H] [IsTopologicalGroup H] :
IsTopologicalGroup (G × H) where
continuous_inv := continuous_inv.prodMap continuous_inv
@[to_additive]
instance OrderDual.instIsTopologicalGroup : IsTopologicalGroup Gᵒᵈ where
@[to_additive]
instance Pi.topologicalGroup {C : β → Type*} [∀ b, TopologicalSpace (C b)] [∀ b, Group (C b)]
[∀ b, IsTopologicalGroup (C b)] : IsTopologicalGroup (∀ b, C b) where
continuous_inv := continuous_pi fun i => (continuous_apply i).inv
open MulOpposite
@[to_additive]
instance [Inv α] [ContinuousInv α] : ContinuousInv αᵐᵒᵖ :=
opHomeomorph.symm.isInducing.continuousInv unop_inv
/-- If multiplication is continuous in `α`, then it also is in `αᵐᵒᵖ`. -/
@[to_additive "If addition is continuous in `α`, then it also is in `αᵃᵒᵖ`."]
instance [Group α] [IsTopologicalGroup α] : IsTopologicalGroup αᵐᵒᵖ where
variable (G)
@[to_additive]
theorem nhds_one_symm : comap Inv.inv (𝓝 (1 : G)) = 𝓝 (1 : G) :=
((Homeomorph.inv G).comap_nhds_eq _).trans (congr_arg nhds inv_one)
@[to_additive]
theorem nhds_one_symm' : map Inv.inv (𝓝 (1 : G)) = 𝓝 (1 : G) :=
((Homeomorph.inv G).map_nhds_eq _).trans (congr_arg nhds inv_one)
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mem_nhds_one {S : Set G} (hS : S ∈ (𝓝 1 : Filter G)) : S⁻¹ ∈ 𝓝 (1 : G) := by
rwa [← nhds_one_symm'] at hS
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, x * y)` as a homeomorphism. This is a shear mapping. -/
@[to_additive "The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, x + y)` as a homeomorphism. This is a shear mapping."]
protected def Homeomorph.shearMulRight : G × G ≃ₜ G × G :=
{ Equiv.prodShear (Equiv.refl _) Equiv.mulLeft with
continuous_toFun := by dsimp; fun_prop
continuous_invFun := by dsimp; fun_prop }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Homeomorph.shearMulRight_coe :
⇑(Homeomorph.shearMulRight G) = fun z : G × G => (z.1, z.1 * z.2) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Homeomorph.shearMulRight_symm_coe :
⇑(Homeomorph.shearMulRight G).symm = fun z : G × G => (z.1, z.1⁻¹ * z.2) :=
rfl
variable {G}
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Topology.IsInducing.topologicalGroup {F : Type*} [Group H] [TopologicalSpace H]
[FunLike F H G] [MonoidHomClass F H G] (f : F) (hf : IsInducing f) : IsTopologicalGroup H :=
{ toContinuousMul := hf.continuousMul _
toContinuousInv := hf.continuousInv (map_inv f) }
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.topologicalGroup := IsInducing.topologicalGroup
@[to_additive]
theorem topologicalGroup_induced {F : Type*} [Group H] [FunLike F H G] [MonoidHomClass F H G]
(f : F) :
@IsTopologicalGroup H (induced f ‹_›) _ :=
letI := induced f ‹_›
IsInducing.topologicalGroup f ⟨rfl⟩
namespace Subgroup
@[to_additive]
instance (S : Subgroup G) : IsTopologicalGroup S :=
IsInducing.subtypeVal.topologicalGroup S.subtype
end Subgroup
/-- The (topological-space) closure of a subgroup of a topological group is
itself a subgroup. -/
@[to_additive
"The (topological-space) closure of an additive subgroup of an additive topological group is
itself an additive subgroup."]
def Subgroup.topologicalClosure (s : Subgroup G) : Subgroup G :=
{ s.toSubmonoid.topologicalClosure with
carrier := _root_.closure (s : Set G)
inv_mem' := fun {g} hg => by simpa only [← Set.mem_inv, inv_closure, inv_coe_set] using hg }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Subgroup.topologicalClosure_coe {s : Subgroup G} :
(s.topologicalClosure : Set G) = _root_.closure s :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem Subgroup.le_topologicalClosure (s : Subgroup G) : s ≤ s.topologicalClosure :=
_root_.subset_closure
@[to_additive]
theorem Subgroup.isClosed_topologicalClosure (s : Subgroup G) :
IsClosed (s.topologicalClosure : Set G) := isClosed_closure
@[to_additive]
theorem Subgroup.topologicalClosure_minimal (s : Subgroup G) {t : Subgroup G} (h : s ≤ t)
(ht : IsClosed (t : Set G)) : s.topologicalClosure ≤ t :=
closure_minimal h ht
@[to_additive]
theorem DenseRange.topologicalClosure_map_subgroup [Group H] [TopologicalSpace H]
[IsTopologicalGroup H] {f : G →* H} (hf : Continuous f) (hf' : DenseRange f) {s : Subgroup G}
(hs : s.topologicalClosure = ⊤) : (s.map f).topologicalClosure = ⊤ := by
rw [SetLike.ext'_iff] at hs ⊢
simp only [Subgroup.topologicalClosure_coe, Subgroup.coe_top, ← dense_iff_closure_eq] at hs ⊢
exact hf'.dense_image hf hs
/-- The topological closure of a normal subgroup is normal. -/
@[to_additive "The topological closure of a normal additive subgroup is normal."]
theorem Subgroup.is_normal_topologicalClosure {G : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G] [Group G]
[IsTopologicalGroup G] (N : Subgroup G) [N.Normal] :
(Subgroup.topologicalClosure N).Normal where
conj_mem n hn g := by
apply map_mem_closure (IsTopologicalGroup.continuous_conj g) hn
exact fun m hm => Subgroup.Normal.conj_mem inferInstance m hm g
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_connectedComponent_one {G : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G] [MulOneClass G]
[ContinuousMul G] {g h : G} (hg : g ∈ connectedComponent (1 : G))
(hh : h ∈ connectedComponent (1 : G)) : g * h ∈ connectedComponent (1 : G) := by
rw [connectedComponent_eq hg]
have hmul : g ∈ connectedComponent (g * h) := by
apply Continuous.image_connectedComponent_subset (continuous_mul_left g)
rw [← connectedComponent_eq hh]
exact ⟨(1 : G), mem_connectedComponent, by simp only [mul_one]⟩
simpa [← connectedComponent_eq hmul] using mem_connectedComponent
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mem_connectedComponent_one {G : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G] [DivisionMonoid G]
[ContinuousInv G] {g : G} (hg : g ∈ connectedComponent (1 : G)) :
g⁻¹ ∈ connectedComponent (1 : G) := by
rw [← inv_one]
exact
Continuous.image_connectedComponent_subset continuous_inv _
((Set.mem_image _ _ _).mp ⟨g, hg, rfl⟩)
/-- The connected component of 1 is a subgroup of `G`. -/
@[to_additive "The connected component of 0 is a subgroup of `G`."]
def Subgroup.connectedComponentOfOne (G : Type*) [TopologicalSpace G] [Group G]
[IsTopologicalGroup G] : Subgroup G where
carrier := connectedComponent (1 : G)
one_mem' := mem_connectedComponent
mul_mem' hg hh := mul_mem_connectedComponent_one hg hh
inv_mem' hg := inv_mem_connectedComponent_one hg
/-- If a subgroup of a topological group is commutative, then so is its topological closure.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
@[to_additive
"If a subgroup of an additive topological group is commutative, then so is its
topological closure.
See note [reducible non-instances]."]
abbrev Subgroup.commGroupTopologicalClosure [T2Space G] (s : Subgroup G)
(hs : ∀ x y : s, x * y = y * x) : CommGroup s.topologicalClosure :=
{ s.topologicalClosure.toGroup, s.toSubmonoid.commMonoidTopologicalClosure hs with }
variable (G) in
@[to_additive]
lemma Subgroup.coe_topologicalClosure_bot :
((⊥ : Subgroup G).topologicalClosure : Set G) = _root_.closure ({1} : Set G) := by simp
@[to_additive exists_nhds_half_neg]
theorem exists_nhds_split_inv {s : Set G} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 (1 : G)) :
∃ V ∈ 𝓝 (1 : G), ∀ v ∈ V, ∀ w ∈ V, v / w ∈ s := by
have : (fun p : G × G => p.1 * p.2⁻¹) ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝 ((1, 1) : G × G) :=
continuousAt_fst.mul continuousAt_snd.inv (by simpa)
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, nhds_prod_eq, mem_prod_self_iff, prod_subset_iff, mem_preimage] using
this
@[to_additive]
theorem nhds_translation_mul_inv (x : G) : comap (· * x⁻¹) (𝓝 1) = 𝓝 x :=
((Homeomorph.mulRight x⁻¹).comap_nhds_eq 1).trans <| show 𝓝 (1 * x⁻¹⁻¹) = 𝓝 x by simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_mul_left_nhds (x y : G) : map (x * ·) (𝓝 y) = 𝓝 (x * y) :=
(Homeomorph.mulLeft x).map_nhds_eq y
@[to_additive]
theorem map_mul_left_nhds_one (x : G) : map (x * ·) (𝓝 1) = 𝓝 x := by simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_mul_right_nhds (x y : G) : map (· * x) (𝓝 y) = 𝓝 (y * x) :=
(Homeomorph.mulRight x).map_nhds_eq y
@[to_additive]
theorem map_mul_right_nhds_one (x : G) : map (· * x) (𝓝 1) = 𝓝 x := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem Filter.HasBasis.nhds_of_one {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set G}
(hb : HasBasis (𝓝 1 : Filter G) p s) (x : G) :
HasBasis (𝓝 x) p fun i => { y | y / x ∈ s i } := by
rw [← nhds_translation_mul_inv]
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
exact hb.comap _
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_closure_iff_nhds_one {x : G} {s : Set G} :
x ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ U ∈ (𝓝 1 : Filter G), ∃ y ∈ s, y / x ∈ U := by
rw [mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis ((𝓝 1 : Filter G).basis_sets.nhds_of_one x)]
simp_rw [Set.mem_setOf, id]
/-- A monoid homomorphism (a bundled morphism of a type that implements `MonoidHomClass`) from a
topological group to a topological monoid is continuous provided that it is continuous at one. See
also `uniformContinuous_of_continuousAt_one`. -/
@[to_additive
"An additive monoid homomorphism (a bundled morphism of a type that implements
`AddMonoidHomClass`) from an additive topological group to an additive topological monoid is
continuous provided that it is continuous at zero. See also
`uniformContinuous_of_continuousAt_zero`."]
theorem continuous_of_continuousAt_one {M hom : Type*} [MulOneClass M] [TopologicalSpace M]
[ContinuousMul M] [FunLike hom G M] [MonoidHomClass hom G M] (f : hom)
(hf : ContinuousAt f 1) :
Continuous f :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun x => by
simpa only [ContinuousAt, ← map_mul_left_nhds_one x, tendsto_map'_iff, Function.comp_def,
map_mul, map_one, mul_one] using hf.tendsto.const_mul (f x)
@[to_additive continuous_of_continuousAt_zero₂]
theorem continuous_of_continuousAt_one₂ {H M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [TopologicalSpace M]
[ContinuousMul M] [Group H] [TopologicalSpace H] [IsTopologicalGroup H] (f : G →* H →* M)
(hf : ContinuousAt (fun x : G × H ↦ f x.1 x.2) (1, 1))
(hl : ∀ x, ContinuousAt (f x) 1) (hr : ∀ y, ContinuousAt (f · y) 1) :
Continuous (fun x : G × H ↦ f x.1 x.2) := continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun (x, y) => by
simp only [ContinuousAt, nhds_prod_eq, ← map_mul_left_nhds_one x, ← map_mul_left_nhds_one y,
prod_map_map_eq, tendsto_map'_iff, Function.comp_def, map_mul, MonoidHom.mul_apply] at *
refine ((tendsto_const_nhds.mul ((hr y).comp tendsto_fst)).mul
(((hl x).comp tendsto_snd).mul hf)).mono_right (le_of_eq ?_)
simp only [map_one, mul_one, MonoidHom.one_apply]
@[to_additive]
lemma IsTopologicalGroup.isInducing_iff_nhds_one
{H : Type*} [Group H] [TopologicalSpace H] [IsTopologicalGroup H] {F : Type*}
[FunLike F G H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] {f : F} :
Topology.IsInducing f ↔ 𝓝 (1 : G) = (𝓝 (1 : H)).comap f := by
rw [Topology.isInducing_iff_nhds]
refine ⟨(map_one f ▸ · 1), fun hf x ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← nhds_translation_mul_inv, ← nhds_translation_mul_inv (f x), Filter.comap_comap, hf,
Filter.comap_comap]
congr 1
ext; simp
@[to_additive]
lemma TopologicalGroup.isOpenMap_iff_nhds_one
{H : Type*} [Monoid H] [TopologicalSpace H] [ContinuousConstSMul H H]
{F : Type*} [FunLike F G H] [MonoidHomClass F G H] {f : F} :
IsOpenMap f ↔ 𝓝 1 ≤ .map f (𝓝 1) := by
refine ⟨fun H ↦ map_one f ▸ H.nhds_le 1, fun h ↦ IsOpenMap.of_nhds_le fun x ↦ ?_⟩
have : Filter.map (f x * ·) (𝓝 1) = 𝓝 (f x) := by
simpa [-Homeomorph.map_nhds_eq, Units.smul_def] using
(Homeomorph.smul ((toUnits x).map (MonoidHomClass.toMonoidHom f))).map_nhds_eq (1 : H)
rw [← map_mul_left_nhds_one x, Filter.map_map, Function.comp_def, ← this]
refine (Filter.map_mono h).trans ?_
simp [Function.comp_def]
-- TODO: unify with `QuotientGroup.isOpenQuotientMap_mk`
/-- Let `A` and `B` be topological groups, and let `φ : A → B` be a continuous surjective group
homomorphism. Assume furthermore that `φ` is a quotient map (i.e., `V ⊆ B`
is open iff `φ⁻¹ V` is open). Then `φ` is an open quotient map, and in particular an open map. -/
@[to_additive "Let `A` and `B` be topological additive groups, and let `φ : A → B` be a continuous
surjective additive group homomorphism. Assume furthermore that `φ` is a quotient map (i.e., `V ⊆ B`
is open iff `φ⁻¹ V` is open). Then `φ` is an open quotient map, and in particular an open map."]
lemma MonoidHom.isOpenQuotientMap_of_isQuotientMap {A : Type*} [Group A]
[TopologicalSpace A] [ContinuousMul A] {B : Type*} [Group B] [TopologicalSpace B]
{F : Type*} [FunLike F A B] [MonoidHomClass F A B] {φ : F}
(hφ : IsQuotientMap φ) : IsOpenQuotientMap φ where
surjective := hφ.surjective
continuous := hφ.continuous
isOpenMap := by
-- We need to check that if `U ⊆ A` is open then `φ⁻¹ (φ U)` is open.
intro U hU
rw [← hφ.isOpen_preimage]
-- It suffices to show that `φ⁻¹ (φ U) = ⋃ (U * k⁻¹)` as `k` runs through the kernel of `φ`,
-- as `U * k⁻¹` is open because `x ↦ x * k` is continuous.
-- Remark: here is where we use that we have groups not monoids (you cannot avoid
-- using both `k` and `k⁻¹` at this point).
suffices ⇑φ ⁻¹' (⇑φ '' U) = ⋃ k ∈ ker (φ : A →* B), (fun x ↦ x * k) ⁻¹' U by
exact this ▸ isOpen_biUnion (fun k _ ↦ Continuous.isOpen_preimage (by fun_prop) _ hU)
ext x
-- But this is an elementary calculation.
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hyU, hyx⟩
apply Set.mem_iUnion_of_mem (x⁻¹ * y)
simp_all
· rintro ⟨_, ⟨k, rfl⟩, _, ⟨(hk : φ k = 1), rfl⟩, hx⟩
use x * k, hx
rw [map_mul, hk, mul_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsTopologicalGroup.ext {G : Type*} [Group G] {t t' : TopologicalSpace G}
(tg : @IsTopologicalGroup G t _) (tg' : @IsTopologicalGroup G t' _)
(h : @nhds G t 1 = @nhds G t' 1) : t = t' :=
TopologicalSpace.ext_nhds fun x ↦ by
rw [← @nhds_translation_mul_inv G t _ _ x, ← @nhds_translation_mul_inv G t' _ _ x, ← h]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsTopologicalGroup.ext_iff {G : Type*} [Group G] {t t' : TopologicalSpace G}
(tg : @IsTopologicalGroup G t _) (tg' : @IsTopologicalGroup G t' _) :
t = t' ↔ @nhds G t 1 = @nhds G t' 1 :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ rfl, tg.ext tg'⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem ContinuousInv.of_nhds_one {G : Type*} [Group G] [TopologicalSpace G]
(hinv : Tendsto (fun x : G => x⁻¹) (𝓝 1) (𝓝 1))
(hleft : ∀ x₀ : G, 𝓝 x₀ = map (fun x : G => x₀ * x) (𝓝 1))
(hconj : ∀ x₀ : G, Tendsto (fun x : G => x₀ * x * x₀⁻¹) (𝓝 1) (𝓝 1)) : ContinuousInv G := by
refine ⟨continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun x₀ => ?_⟩
have : Tendsto (fun x => x₀⁻¹ * (x₀ * x⁻¹ * x₀⁻¹)) (𝓝 1) (map (x₀⁻¹ * ·) (𝓝 1)) :=
(tendsto_map.comp <| hconj x₀).comp hinv
simpa only [ContinuousAt, hleft x₀, hleft x₀⁻¹, tendsto_map'_iff, Function.comp_def, mul_assoc,
mul_inv_rev, inv_mul_cancel_left] using this
@[to_additive]
theorem IsTopologicalGroup.of_nhds_one' {G : Type u} [Group G] [TopologicalSpace G]
(hmul : Tendsto (uncurry ((· * ·) : G → G → G)) (𝓝 1 ×ˢ 𝓝 1) (𝓝 1))
(hinv : Tendsto (fun x : G => x⁻¹) (𝓝 1) (𝓝 1))
(hleft : ∀ x₀ : G, 𝓝 x₀ = map (fun x => x₀ * x) (𝓝 1))
(hright : ∀ x₀ : G, 𝓝 x₀ = map (fun x => x * x₀) (𝓝 1)) : IsTopologicalGroup G :=
{ toContinuousMul := ContinuousMul.of_nhds_one hmul hleft hright
toContinuousInv :=
ContinuousInv.of_nhds_one hinv hleft fun x₀ =>
le_of_eq
(by
rw [show (fun x => x₀ * x * x₀⁻¹) = (fun x => x * x₀⁻¹) ∘ fun x => x₀ * x from rfl, ←
map_map, ← hleft, hright, map_map]
simp [(· ∘ ·)]) }
@[to_additive]
theorem IsTopologicalGroup.of_nhds_one {G : Type u} [Group G] [TopologicalSpace G]
(hmul : Tendsto (uncurry ((· * ·) : G → G → G)) (𝓝 1 ×ˢ 𝓝 1) (𝓝 1))
(hinv : Tendsto (fun x : G => x⁻¹) (𝓝 1) (𝓝 1))
(hleft : ∀ x₀ : G, 𝓝 x₀ = map (x₀ * ·) (𝓝 1))
(hconj : ∀ x₀ : G, Tendsto (x₀ * · * x₀⁻¹) (𝓝 1) (𝓝 1)) : IsTopologicalGroup G := by
refine IsTopologicalGroup.of_nhds_one' hmul hinv hleft fun x₀ => ?_
replace hconj : ∀ x₀ : G, map (x₀ * · * x₀⁻¹) (𝓝 1) = 𝓝 1 :=
fun x₀ => map_eq_of_inverse (x₀⁻¹ * · * x₀⁻¹⁻¹) (by ext; simp [mul_assoc]) (hconj _) (hconj _)
rw [← hconj x₀]
simpa [Function.comp_def] using hleft _
@[to_additive]
theorem IsTopologicalGroup.of_comm_of_nhds_one {G : Type u} [CommGroup G] [TopologicalSpace G]
(hmul : Tendsto (uncurry ((· * ·) : G → G → G)) (𝓝 1 ×ˢ 𝓝 1) (𝓝 1))
(hinv : Tendsto (fun x : G => x⁻¹) (𝓝 1) (𝓝 1))
(hleft : ∀ x₀ : G, 𝓝 x₀ = map (x₀ * ·) (𝓝 1)) : IsTopologicalGroup G :=
IsTopologicalGroup.of_nhds_one hmul hinv hleft (by simpa using tendsto_id)
variable (G) in
/-- Any first countable topological group has an antitone neighborhood basis `u : ℕ → Set G` for
which `(u (n + 1)) ^ 2 ⊆ u n`. The existence of such a neighborhood basis is a key tool for
`QuotientGroup.completeSpace` -/
@[to_additive
"Any first countable topological additive group has an antitone neighborhood basis
`u : ℕ → set G` for which `u (n + 1) + u (n + 1) ⊆ u n`.
The existence of such a neighborhood basis is a key tool for `QuotientAddGroup.completeSpace`"]
theorem IsTopologicalGroup.exists_antitone_basis_nhds_one [FirstCountableTopology G] :
∃ u : ℕ → Set G, (𝓝 1).HasAntitoneBasis u ∧ ∀ n, u (n + 1) * u (n + 1) ⊆ u n := by
rcases (𝓝 (1 : G)).exists_antitone_basis with ⟨u, hu, u_anti⟩
have :=
((hu.prod_nhds hu).tendsto_iff hu).mp
(by simpa only [mul_one] using continuous_mul.tendsto ((1, 1) : G × G))
simp only [and_self_iff, mem_prod, and_imp, Prod.forall, exists_true_left, Prod.exists,
forall_true_left] at this
have event_mul : ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᶠ m in atTop, u m * u m ⊆ u n := by
intro n
rcases this n with ⟨j, k, -, h⟩
refine atTop_basis.eventually_iff.mpr ⟨max j k, True.intro, fun m hm => ?_⟩
rintro - ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩
exact h a b (u_anti ((le_max_left _ _).trans hm) ha) (u_anti ((le_max_right _ _).trans hm) hb)
obtain ⟨φ, -, hφ, φ_anti_basis⟩ := HasAntitoneBasis.subbasis_with_rel ⟨hu, u_anti⟩ event_mul
exact ⟨u ∘ φ, φ_anti_basis, fun n => hφ n.lt_succ_self⟩
end IsTopologicalGroup
section ContinuousDiv
variable [TopologicalSpace G] [Div G] [ContinuousDiv G]
@[to_additive const_sub]
theorem Filter.Tendsto.const_div' (b : G) {c : G} {f : α → G} {l : Filter α}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 c)) : Tendsto (fun k : α => b / f k) l (𝓝 (b / c)) :=
tendsto_const_nhds.div' h
@[to_additive]
lemma Filter.tendsto_const_div_iff {G : Type*} [CommGroup G] [TopologicalSpace G] [ContinuousDiv G]
(b : G) {c : G} {f : α → G} {l : Filter α} :
Tendsto (fun k : α ↦ b / f k) l (𝓝 (b / c)) ↔ Tendsto f l (𝓝 c) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, Filter.Tendsto.const_div' b⟩
convert h.const_div' b with k <;> rw [div_div_cancel]
@[to_additive sub_const]
theorem Filter.Tendsto.div_const' {c : G} {f : α → G} {l : Filter α} (h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 c))
(b : G) : Tendsto (f · / b) l (𝓝 (c / b)) :=
h.div' tendsto_const_nhds
lemma Filter.tendsto_div_const_iff {G : Type*}
[CommGroupWithZero G] [TopologicalSpace G] [ContinuousDiv G]
{b : G} (hb : b ≠ 0) {c : G} {f : α → G} {l : Filter α} :
Tendsto (f · / b) l (𝓝 (c / b)) ↔ Tendsto f l (𝓝 c) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ Filter.Tendsto.div_const' h b⟩
convert h.div_const' b⁻¹ with k <;> rw [div_div, mul_inv_cancel₀ hb, div_one]
lemma Filter.tendsto_sub_const_iff {G : Type*}
[AddCommGroup G] [TopologicalSpace G] [ContinuousSub G]
(b : G) {c : G} {f : α → G} {l : Filter α} :
Tendsto (f · - b) l (𝓝 (c - b)) ↔ Tendsto f l (𝓝 c) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ Filter.Tendsto.sub_const h b⟩
convert h.sub_const (-b) with k <;> rw [sub_sub, ← sub_eq_add_neg, sub_self, sub_zero]
variable [TopologicalSpace α] {f g : α → G} {s : Set α} {x : α}
@[to_additive (attr := continuity) continuous_sub_left]
lemma continuous_div_left' (a : G) : Continuous (a / ·) := continuous_const.div' continuous_id
@[to_additive (attr := continuity) continuous_sub_right]
lemma continuous_div_right' (a : G) : Continuous (· / a) := continuous_id.div' continuous_const
end ContinuousDiv
section DivInvTopologicalGroup
variable [Group G] [TopologicalSpace G] [IsTopologicalGroup G]
/-- A version of `Homeomorph.mulLeft a b⁻¹` that is defeq to `a / b`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps! +simpRhs)
"A version of `Homeomorph.addLeft a (-b)` that is defeq to `a - b`."]
def Homeomorph.divLeft (x : G) : G ≃ₜ G :=
{ Equiv.divLeft x with
continuous_toFun := continuous_const.div' continuous_id
continuous_invFun := continuous_inv.mul continuous_const }
@[to_additive]
theorem isOpenMap_div_left (a : G) : IsOpenMap (a / ·) :=
(Homeomorph.divLeft _).isOpenMap
@[to_additive]
theorem isClosedMap_div_left (a : G) : IsClosedMap (a / ·) :=
(Homeomorph.divLeft _).isClosedMap
/-- A version of `Homeomorph.mulRight a⁻¹ b` that is defeq to `b / a`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps! +simpRhs)
"A version of `Homeomorph.addRight (-a) b` that is defeq to `b - a`. "]
def Homeomorph.divRight (x : G) : G ≃ₜ G :=
{ Equiv.divRight x with
continuous_toFun := continuous_id.div' continuous_const
continuous_invFun := continuous_id.mul continuous_const }
@[to_additive]
lemma isOpenMap_div_right (a : G) : IsOpenMap (· / a) := (Homeomorph.divRight a).isOpenMap
@[to_additive]
lemma isClosedMap_div_right (a : G) : IsClosedMap (· / a) := (Homeomorph.divRight a).isClosedMap
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_div_nhds_one_iff {α : Type*} {l : Filter α} {x : G} {u : α → G} :
Tendsto (u · / x) l (𝓝 1) ↔ Tendsto u l (𝓝 x) :=
haveI A : Tendsto (fun _ : α => x) l (𝓝 x) := tendsto_const_nhds
⟨fun h => by simpa using h.mul A, fun h => by simpa using h.div' A⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem nhds_translation_div (x : G) : comap (· / x) (𝓝 1) = 𝓝 x := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using nhds_translation_mul_inv x
end DivInvTopologicalGroup
section FilterMul
section
variable (G) [TopologicalSpace G] [Group G] [ContinuousMul G]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsTopologicalGroup.t1Space (h : @IsClosed G _ {1}) : T1Space G :=
⟨fun x => by simpa using isClosedMap_mul_right x _ h⟩
end
section
variable [TopologicalSpace G] [Group G] [IsTopologicalGroup G]
variable (S : Subgroup G) [Subgroup.Normal S] [IsClosed (S : Set G)]
/-- A subgroup `S` of a topological group `G` acts on `G` properly discontinuously on the left, if
it is discrete in the sense that `S ∩ K` is finite for all compact `K`. (See also
`DiscreteTopology`.) -/
@[to_additive
"A subgroup `S` of an additive topological group `G` acts on `G` properly
discontinuously on the left, if it is discrete in the sense that `S ∩ K` is finite for all compact
`K`. (See also `DiscreteTopology`."]
theorem Subgroup.properlyDiscontinuousSMul_of_tendsto_cofinite (S : Subgroup G)
(hS : Tendsto S.subtype cofinite (cocompact G)) : ProperlyDiscontinuousSMul S G :=
{ finite_disjoint_inter_image := by
intro K L hK hL
have H : Set.Finite _ := hS ((hL.prod hK).image continuous_div').compl_mem_cocompact
rw [preimage_compl, compl_compl] at H
convert H
ext x
simp only [image_smul, mem_setOf_eq, coe_subtype, mem_preimage, mem_image, Prod.exists]
exact Set.smul_inter_ne_empty_iff' }
/-- A subgroup `S` of a topological group `G` acts on `G` properly discontinuously on the right, if
it is discrete in the sense that `S ∩ K` is finite for all compact `K`. (See also
`DiscreteTopology`.)
If `G` is Hausdorff, this can be combined with `t2Space_of_properlyDiscontinuousSMul_of_t2Space`
to show that the quotient group `G ⧸ S` is Hausdorff. -/
@[to_additive
"A subgroup `S` of an additive topological group `G` acts on `G` properly discontinuously
on the right, if it is discrete in the sense that `S ∩ K` is finite for all compact `K`.
(See also `DiscreteTopology`.)
If `G` is Hausdorff, this can be combined with `t2Space_of_properlyDiscontinuousVAdd_of_t2Space`
to show that the quotient group `G ⧸ S` is Hausdorff."]
theorem Subgroup.properlyDiscontinuousSMul_opposite_of_tendsto_cofinite (S : Subgroup G)
(hS : Tendsto S.subtype cofinite (cocompact G)) : ProperlyDiscontinuousSMul S.op G :=
{ finite_disjoint_inter_image := by
intro K L hK hL
have : Continuous fun p : G × G => (p.1⁻¹, p.2) := continuous_inv.prodMap continuous_id
have H : Set.Finite _ :=
hS ((hK.prod hL).image (continuous_mul.comp this)).compl_mem_cocompact
simp only [preimage_compl, compl_compl, coe_subtype, comp_apply] at H
apply Finite.of_preimage _ (equivOp S).surjective
convert H using 1
ext x
simp only [image_smul, mem_setOf_eq, coe_subtype, mem_preimage, mem_image, Prod.exists]
exact Set.op_smul_inter_ne_empty_iff }
end
section
/-! Some results about an open set containing the product of two sets in a topological group. -/
variable [TopologicalSpace G] [MulOneClass G] [ContinuousMul G]
/-- Given a compact set `K` inside an open set `U`, there is an open neighborhood `V` of `1`
such that `K * V ⊆ U`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a compact set `K` inside an open set `U`, there is an open neighborhood `V` of
`0` such that `K + V ⊆ U`."]
theorem compact_open_separated_mul_right {K U : Set G} (hK : IsCompact K) (hU : IsOpen U)
(hKU : K ⊆ U) : ∃ V ∈ 𝓝 (1 : G), K * V ⊆ U := by
refine hK.induction_on ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· exact ⟨univ, by simp⟩
· rintro s t hst ⟨V, hV, hV'⟩
exact ⟨V, hV, (mul_subset_mul_right hst).trans hV'⟩
· rintro s t ⟨V, V_in, hV'⟩ ⟨W, W_in, hW'⟩
use V ∩ W, inter_mem V_in W_in
rw [union_mul]
exact
union_subset ((mul_subset_mul_left V.inter_subset_left).trans hV')
((mul_subset_mul_left V.inter_subset_right).trans hW')
· intro x hx
have := tendsto_mul (show U ∈ 𝓝 (x * 1) by simpa using hU.mem_nhds (hKU hx))
rw [nhds_prod_eq, mem_map, mem_prod_iff] at this
rcases this with ⟨t, ht, s, hs, h⟩
rw [← image_subset_iff, image_mul_prod] at h
exact ⟨t, mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds ht, s, hs, h⟩
open MulOpposite
/-- Given a compact set `K` inside an open set `U`, there is an open neighborhood `V` of `1`
such that `V * K ⊆ U`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a compact set `K` inside an open set `U`, there is an open neighborhood `V` of
`0` such that `V + K ⊆ U`."]
theorem compact_open_separated_mul_left {K U : Set G} (hK : IsCompact K) (hU : IsOpen U)
(hKU : K ⊆ U) : ∃ V ∈ 𝓝 (1 : G), V * K ⊆ U := by
rcases compact_open_separated_mul_right (hK.image continuous_op) (opHomeomorph.isOpenMap U hU)
(image_subset op hKU) with
⟨V, hV : V ∈ 𝓝 (op (1 : G)), hV' : op '' K * V ⊆ op '' U⟩
refine ⟨op ⁻¹' V, continuous_op.continuousAt hV, ?_⟩
rwa [← image_preimage_eq V op_surjective, ← image_op_mul, image_subset_iff,
preimage_image_eq _ op_injective] at hV'
end
section
variable [TopologicalSpace G] [Group G] [IsTopologicalGroup G]
/-- A compact set is covered by finitely many left multiplicative translates of a set
with non-empty interior. -/
@[to_additive
"A compact set is covered by finitely many left additive translates of a set
with non-empty interior."]
theorem compact_covered_by_mul_left_translates {K V : Set G} (hK : IsCompact K)
(hV : (interior V).Nonempty) : ∃ t : Finset G, K ⊆ ⋃ g ∈ t, (g * ·) ⁻¹' V := by
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ : ∃ t : Finset G, K ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, interior ((x * ·) ⁻¹' V) := by
refine
hK.elim_finite_subcover (fun x => interior <| (x * ·) ⁻¹' V) (fun x => isOpen_interior) ?_
obtain ⟨g₀, hg₀⟩ := hV
refine fun g _ => mem_iUnion.2 ⟨g₀ * g⁻¹, ?_⟩
refine preimage_interior_subset_interior_preimage (continuous_const.mul continuous_id) ?_
rwa [mem_preimage, Function.id_def, inv_mul_cancel_right]
exact ⟨t, Subset.trans ht <| iUnion₂_mono fun g _ => interior_subset⟩
/-- Every weakly locally compact separable topological group is σ-compact.
Note: this is not true if we drop the topological group hypothesis. -/
@[to_additive SeparableWeaklyLocallyCompactAddGroup.sigmaCompactSpace
"Every weakly locally compact separable topological additive group is σ-compact.
Note: this is not true if we drop the topological group hypothesis."]
instance (priority := 100) SeparableWeaklyLocallyCompactGroup.sigmaCompactSpace [SeparableSpace G]
[WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace G] : SigmaCompactSpace G := by
obtain ⟨L, hLc, hL1⟩ := exists_compact_mem_nhds (1 : G)
refine ⟨⟨fun n => (fun x => x * denseSeq G n) ⁻¹' L, ?_, ?_⟩⟩
· intro n
exact (Homeomorph.mulRight _).isCompact_preimage.mpr hLc
· refine iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun x => ?_
obtain ⟨_, ⟨n, rfl⟩, hn⟩ : (range (denseSeq G) ∩ (fun y => x * y) ⁻¹' L).Nonempty := by
rw [← (Homeomorph.mulLeft x).apply_symm_apply 1] at hL1
exact (denseRange_denseSeq G).inter_nhds_nonempty
((Homeomorph.mulLeft x).continuous.continuousAt <| hL1)
exact ⟨n, hn⟩
/-- Given two compact sets in a noncompact topological group, there is a translate of the second
one that is disjoint from the first one. -/
@[to_additive
"Given two compact sets in a noncompact additive topological group, there is a
translate of the second one that is disjoint from the first one."]
theorem exists_disjoint_smul_of_isCompact [NoncompactSpace G] {K L : Set G} (hK : IsCompact K)
(hL : IsCompact L) : ∃ g : G, Disjoint K (g • L) := by
have A : ¬K * L⁻¹ = univ := (hK.mul hL.inv).ne_univ
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ : ∃ g, g ∉ K * L⁻¹ := by
contrapose! A
exact eq_univ_iff_forall.2 A
refine ⟨g, ?_⟩
refine disjoint_left.2 fun a ha h'a => hg ?_
rcases h'a with ⟨b, bL, rfl⟩
refine ⟨g * b, ha, b⁻¹, by simpa only [Set.mem_inv, inv_inv] using bL, ?_⟩
simp only [smul_eq_mul, mul_inv_cancel_right]
end
section
variable [TopologicalSpace G] [Group G] [IsTopologicalGroup G]
@[to_additive]
theorem nhds_mul (x y : G) : 𝓝 (x * y) = 𝓝 x * 𝓝 y :=
calc
𝓝 (x * y) = map (x * ·) (map (· * y) (𝓝 1 * 𝓝 1)) := by simp
_ = map₂ (fun a b => x * (a * b * y)) (𝓝 1) (𝓝 1) := by rw [← map₂_mul, map_map₂, map_map₂]
_ = map₂ (fun a b => x * a * (b * y)) (𝓝 1) (𝓝 1) := by simp only [mul_assoc]
_ = 𝓝 x * 𝓝 y := by
rw [← map_mul_left_nhds_one x, ← map_mul_right_nhds_one y, ← map₂_mul, map₂_map_left,
map₂_map_right]
/-- On a topological group, `𝓝 : G → Filter G` can be promoted to a `MulHom`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps)
"On an additive topological group, `𝓝 : G → Filter G` can be promoted to an `AddHom`."]
def nhdsMulHom : G →ₙ* Filter G where
toFun := 𝓝
map_mul' _ _ := nhds_mul _ _
end
end FilterMul
instance {G} [TopologicalSpace G] [Group G] [IsTopologicalGroup G] :
IsTopologicalAddGroup (Additive G) where
continuous_neg := @continuous_inv G _ _ _
instance {G} [TopologicalSpace G] [AddGroup G] [IsTopologicalAddGroup G] :
IsTopologicalGroup (Multiplicative G) where
continuous_inv := @continuous_neg G _ _ _
/-- If `G` is a group with topological `⁻¹`, then it is homeomorphic to its units. -/
@[to_additive "If `G` is an additive group with topological negation, then it is homeomorphic to
its additive units."]
def toUnits_homeomorph [Group G] [TopologicalSpace G] [ContinuousInv G] : G ≃ₜ Gˣ where
toEquiv := toUnits.toEquiv
continuous_toFun := Units.continuous_iff.2 ⟨continuous_id, continuous_inv⟩
continuous_invFun := Units.continuous_val
@[to_additive] theorem Units.isEmbedding_val [Group G] [TopologicalSpace G] [ContinuousInv G] :
IsEmbedding (val : Gˣ → G) :=
toUnits_homeomorph.symm.isEmbedding
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias Units.embedding_val := Units.isEmbedding_val
lemma Continuous.of_coeHom_comp [Group G] [Monoid H] [TopologicalSpace G] [TopologicalSpace H]
[ContinuousInv G] {f : G →* Hˣ} (hf : Continuous ((Units.coeHom H).comp f)) : Continuous f := by
apply continuous_induced_rng.mpr ?_
refine continuous_prodMk.mpr ⟨hf, ?_⟩
simp_rw [← map_inv]
exact MulOpposite.continuous_op.comp (hf.comp continuous_inv)
namespace Units
open MulOpposite (continuous_op continuous_unop)
variable [Monoid α] [TopologicalSpace α] [Monoid β] [TopologicalSpace β]
@[to_additive]
instance [ContinuousMul α] : IsTopologicalGroup αˣ where
continuous_inv := Units.continuous_iff.2 <| ⟨continuous_coe_inv, continuous_val⟩
/-- The topological group isomorphism between the units of a product of two monoids, and the product
of the units of each monoid. -/
@[to_additive prodAddUnits
"The topological group isomorphism between the additive units of a product of two
additive monoids, and the product of the additive units of each additive monoid."]
def _root_.Homeomorph.prodUnits : (α × β)ˣ ≃ₜ αˣ × βˣ where
continuous_toFun :=
(continuous_fst.units_map (MonoidHom.fst α β)).prodMk
(continuous_snd.units_map (MonoidHom.snd α β))
continuous_invFun :=
Units.continuous_iff.2
⟨continuous_val.fst'.prodMk continuous_val.snd',
continuous_coe_inv.fst'.prodMk continuous_coe_inv.snd'⟩
toEquiv := MulEquiv.prodUnits.toEquiv
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias Homeomorph.sumAddUnits := Homeomorph.prodAddUnits
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
protected alias Homeomorph.prodUnits := Homeomorph.prodUnits
end Units
section LatticeOps
variable {ι : Sort*} [Group G]
@[to_additive]
theorem topologicalGroup_sInf {ts : Set (TopologicalSpace G)}
(h : ∀ t ∈ ts, @IsTopologicalGroup G t _) : @IsTopologicalGroup G (sInf ts) _ :=
letI := sInf ts
{ toContinuousInv :=
@continuousInv_sInf _ _ _ fun t ht => @IsTopologicalGroup.toContinuousInv G t _ <| h t ht
toContinuousMul :=
@continuousMul_sInf _ _ _ fun t ht =>
@IsTopologicalGroup.toContinuousMul G t _ <| h t ht }
@[to_additive]
theorem topologicalGroup_iInf {ts' : ι → TopologicalSpace G}
(h' : ∀ i, @IsTopologicalGroup G (ts' i) _) : @IsTopologicalGroup G (⨅ i, ts' i) _ := by
rw [← sInf_range]
exact topologicalGroup_sInf (Set.forall_mem_range.mpr h')
@[to_additive]
theorem topologicalGroup_inf {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace G} (h₁ : @IsTopologicalGroup G t₁ _)
(h₂ : @IsTopologicalGroup G t₂ _) : @IsTopologicalGroup G (t₁ ⊓ t₂) _ := by
rw [inf_eq_iInf]
refine topologicalGroup_iInf fun b => ?_
cases b <;> assumption
end LatticeOps
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/Group/Basic.lean | 2,129 | 2,134 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Divisors
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Squarefree
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Induction
import Mathlib.Tactic.ArithMult
/-!
# Arithmetic Functions and Dirichlet Convolution
This file defines arithmetic functions, which are functions from `ℕ` to a specified type that map 0
to 0. In the literature, they are often instead defined as functions from `ℕ+`. These arithmetic
functions are endowed with a multiplication, given by Dirichlet convolution, and pointwise addition,
to form the Dirichlet ring.
## Main Definitions
* `ArithmeticFunction R` consists of functions `f : ℕ → R` such that `f 0 = 0`.
* An arithmetic function `f` `IsMultiplicative` when `x.Coprime y → f (x * y) = f x * f y`.
* The pointwise operations `pmul` and `ppow` differ from the multiplication
and power instances on `ArithmeticFunction R`, which use Dirichlet multiplication.
* `ζ` is the arithmetic function such that `ζ x = 1` for `0 < x`.
* `σ k` is the arithmetic function such that `σ k x = ∑ y ∈ divisors x, y ^ k` for `0 < x`.
* `pow k` is the arithmetic function such that `pow k x = x ^ k` for `0 < x`.
* `id` is the identity arithmetic function on `ℕ`.
* `ω n` is the number of distinct prime factors of `n`.
* `Ω n` is the number of prime factors of `n` counted with multiplicity.
* `μ` is the Möbius function (spelled `moebius` in code).
## Main Results
* Several forms of Möbius inversion:
* `sum_eq_iff_sum_mul_moebius_eq` for functions to a `CommRing`
* `sum_eq_iff_sum_smul_moebius_eq` for functions to an `AddCommGroup`
* `prod_eq_iff_prod_pow_moebius_eq` for functions to a `CommGroup`
* `prod_eq_iff_prod_pow_moebius_eq_of_nonzero` for functions to a `CommGroupWithZero`
* And variants that apply when the equalities only hold on a set `S : Set ℕ` such that
`m ∣ n → n ∈ S → m ∈ S`:
* `sum_eq_iff_sum_mul_moebius_eq_on` for functions to a `CommRing`
* `sum_eq_iff_sum_smul_moebius_eq_on` for functions to an `AddCommGroup`
* `prod_eq_iff_prod_pow_moebius_eq_on` for functions to a `CommGroup`
* `prod_eq_iff_prod_pow_moebius_eq_on_of_nonzero` for functions to a `CommGroupWithZero`
## Notation
All notation is localized in the namespace `ArithmeticFunction`.
The arithmetic functions `ζ`, `σ`, `ω`, `Ω` and `μ` have Greek letter names.
In addition, there are separate locales `ArithmeticFunction.zeta` for `ζ`,
`ArithmeticFunction.sigma` for `σ`, `ArithmeticFunction.omega` for `ω`,
`ArithmeticFunction.Omega` for `Ω`, and `ArithmeticFunction.Moebius` for `μ`,
to allow for selective access to these notations.
The arithmetic function $$n \mapsto \prod_{p \mid n} f(p)$$ is given custom notation
`∏ᵖ p ∣ n, f p` when applied to `n`.
## Tags
arithmetic functions, dirichlet convolution, divisors
-/
open Finset
open Nat
variable (R : Type*)
/-- An arithmetic function is a function from `ℕ` that maps 0 to 0. In the literature, they are
often instead defined as functions from `ℕ+`. Multiplication on `ArithmeticFunctions` is by
Dirichlet convolution. -/
def ArithmeticFunction [Zero R] :=
ZeroHom ℕ R
instance ArithmeticFunction.zero [Zero R] : Zero (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
inferInstanceAs (Zero (ZeroHom ℕ R))
instance [Zero R] : Inhabited (ArithmeticFunction R) := inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (ZeroHom ℕ R))
variable {R}
namespace ArithmeticFunction
section Zero
variable [Zero R]
instance : FunLike (ArithmeticFunction R) ℕ R :=
inferInstanceAs (FunLike (ZeroHom ℕ R) ℕ R)
@[simp]
theorem toFun_eq (f : ArithmeticFunction R) : f.toFun = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk (f : ℕ → R) (hf) : @DFunLike.coe (ArithmeticFunction R) _ _ _
(ZeroHom.mk f hf) = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_zero {f : ArithmeticFunction R} : f 0 = 0 :=
ZeroHom.map_zero' f
theorem coe_inj {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} : (f : ℕ → R) = g ↔ f = g :=
DFunLike.coe_fn_eq
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply {x : ℕ} : (0 : ArithmeticFunction R) x = 0 :=
ZeroHom.zero_apply x
@[ext]
theorem ext ⦃f g : ArithmeticFunction R⦄ (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
ZeroHom.ext h
section One
variable [One R]
instance one : One (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨⟨fun x => ite (x = 1) 1 0, rfl⟩⟩
theorem one_apply {x : ℕ} : (1 : ArithmeticFunction R) x = ite (x = 1) 1 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem one_one : (1 : ArithmeticFunction R) 1 = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem one_apply_ne {x : ℕ} (h : x ≠ 1) : (1 : ArithmeticFunction R) x = 0 :=
if_neg h
end One
end Zero
/-- Coerce an arithmetic function with values in `ℕ` to one with values in `R`. We cannot inline
this in `natCoe` because it gets unfolded too much. -/
@[coe]
def natToArithmeticFunction [AddMonoidWithOne R] :
(ArithmeticFunction ℕ) → (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
fun f => ⟨fun n => ↑(f n), by simp⟩
instance natCoe [AddMonoidWithOne R] : Coe (ArithmeticFunction ℕ) (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨natToArithmeticFunction⟩
@[simp]
theorem natCoe_nat (f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ) : natToArithmeticFunction f = f :=
ext fun _ => cast_id _
@[simp]
theorem natCoe_apply [AddMonoidWithOne R] {f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} {x : ℕ} :
(f : ArithmeticFunction R) x = f x :=
rfl
/-- Coerce an arithmetic function with values in `ℤ` to one with values in `R`. We cannot inline
this in `intCoe` because it gets unfolded too much. -/
@[coe]
def ofInt [AddGroupWithOne R] :
(ArithmeticFunction ℤ) → (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
fun f => ⟨fun n => ↑(f n), by simp⟩
instance intCoe [AddGroupWithOne R] : Coe (ArithmeticFunction ℤ) (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨ofInt⟩
@[simp]
theorem intCoe_int (f : ArithmeticFunction ℤ) : ofInt f = f :=
ext fun _ => Int.cast_id
@[simp]
theorem intCoe_apply [AddGroupWithOne R] {f : ArithmeticFunction ℤ} {x : ℕ} :
(f : ArithmeticFunction R) x = f x := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_coe [AddGroupWithOne R] {f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} :
((f : ArithmeticFunction ℤ) : ArithmeticFunction R) = (f : ArithmeticFunction R) := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem natCoe_one [AddMonoidWithOne R] :
((1 : ArithmeticFunction ℕ) : ArithmeticFunction R) = 1 := by
ext n
simp [one_apply]
@[simp]
theorem intCoe_one [AddGroupWithOne R] : ((1 : ArithmeticFunction ℤ) :
ArithmeticFunction R) = 1 := by
ext n
simp [one_apply]
section AddMonoid
variable [AddMonoid R]
instance add : Add (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨fun f g => ⟨fun n => f n + g n, by simp⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_apply {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} {n : ℕ} : (f + g) n = f n + g n :=
rfl
instance instAddMonoid : AddMonoid (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.zero R,
ArithmeticFunction.add with
add_assoc := fun _ _ _ => ext fun _ => add_assoc _ _ _
zero_add := fun _ => ext fun _ => zero_add _
add_zero := fun _ => ext fun _ => add_zero _
nsmul := nsmulRec }
end AddMonoid
instance instAddMonoidWithOne [AddMonoidWithOne R] : AddMonoidWithOne (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.instAddMonoid,
ArithmeticFunction.one with
natCast := fun n => ⟨fun x => if x = 1 then (n : R) else 0, by simp⟩
natCast_zero := by ext; simp
natCast_succ := fun n => by ext x; by_cases h : x = 1 <;> simp [h] }
instance instAddCommMonoid [AddCommMonoid R] : AddCommMonoid (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.instAddMonoid with add_comm := fun _ _ => ext fun _ => add_comm _ _ }
instance [NegZeroClass R] : Neg (ArithmeticFunction R) where
neg f := ⟨fun n => -f n, by simp⟩
instance [AddGroup R] : AddGroup (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.instAddMonoid with
neg_add_cancel := fun _ => ext fun _ => neg_add_cancel _
zsmul := zsmulRec }
instance [AddCommGroup R] : AddCommGroup (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ show AddGroup (ArithmeticFunction R) by infer_instance with
add_comm := fun _ _ ↦ add_comm _ _ }
section SMul
variable {M : Type*} [Zero R] [AddCommMonoid M] [SMul R M]
/-- The Dirichlet convolution of two arithmetic functions `f` and `g` is another arithmetic function
such that `(f * g) n` is the sum of `f x * g y` over all `(x,y)` such that `x * y = n`. -/
instance : SMul (ArithmeticFunction R) (ArithmeticFunction M) :=
⟨fun f g => ⟨fun n => ∑ x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n, f x.fst • g x.snd, by simp⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {g : ArithmeticFunction M} {n : ℕ} :
(f • g) n = ∑ x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n, f x.fst • g x.snd :=
rfl
end SMul
/-- The Dirichlet convolution of two arithmetic functions `f` and `g` is another arithmetic function
such that `(f * g) n` is the sum of `f x * g y` over all `(x,y)` such that `x * y = n`. -/
instance [Semiring R] : Mul (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨(· • ·)⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_apply [Semiring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} {n : ℕ} :
(f * g) n = ∑ x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n, f x.fst * g x.snd :=
rfl
theorem mul_apply_one [Semiring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} : (f * g) 1 = f 1 * g 1 := by simp
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCoe_mul [Semiring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} :
(↑(f * g) : ArithmeticFunction R) = f * g := by
ext n
simp
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCoe_mul [Ring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction ℤ} :
(↑(f * g) : ArithmeticFunction R) = ↑f * g := by
ext n
simp
section Module
variable {M : Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
theorem mul_smul' (f g : ArithmeticFunction R) (h : ArithmeticFunction M) :
(f * g) • h = f • g • h := by
ext n
simp only [mul_apply, smul_apply, sum_smul, mul_smul, smul_sum, Finset.sum_sigma']
apply Finset.sum_nbij' (fun ⟨⟨_i, j⟩, ⟨k, l⟩⟩ ↦ ⟨(k, l * j), (l, j)⟩)
(fun ⟨⟨i, _j⟩, ⟨k, l⟩⟩ ↦ ⟨(i * k, l), (i, k)⟩) <;> aesop (add simp mul_assoc)
theorem one_smul' (b : ArithmeticFunction M) : (1 : ArithmeticFunction R) • b = b := by
ext x
rw [smul_apply]
by_cases x0 : x = 0
· simp [x0]
have h : {(1, x)} ⊆ divisorsAntidiagonal x := by simp [x0]
rw [← sum_subset h]
· simp
intro y ymem ynmem
have y1ne : y.fst ≠ 1 := fun con => by simp_all [Prod.ext_iff]
simp [y1ne]
end Module
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
instance instMonoid : Monoid (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ one := One.one
mul := Mul.mul
one_mul := one_smul'
mul_one := fun f => by
ext x
rw [mul_apply]
by_cases x0 : x = 0
· simp [x0]
have h : {(x, 1)} ⊆ divisorsAntidiagonal x := by simp [x0]
rw [← sum_subset h]
· simp
intro ⟨y₁, y₂⟩ ymem ynmem
have y2ne : y₂ ≠ 1 := by
intro con
simp_all
simp [y2ne]
mul_assoc := mul_smul' }
instance instSemiring : Semiring (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.instAddMonoidWithOne,
ArithmeticFunction.instMonoid,
ArithmeticFunction.instAddCommMonoid with
zero_mul := fun f => by
ext
simp
mul_zero := fun f => by
ext
simp
left_distrib := fun a b c => by
ext
simp [← sum_add_distrib, mul_add]
right_distrib := fun a b c => by
ext
simp [← sum_add_distrib, add_mul] }
end Semiring
instance [CommSemiring R] : CommSemiring (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.instSemiring with
mul_comm := fun f g => by
ext
rw [mul_apply, ← map_swap_divisorsAntidiagonal, sum_map]
simp [mul_comm] }
instance [CommRing R] : CommRing (ArithmeticFunction R) :=
{ ArithmeticFunction.instSemiring with
neg_add_cancel := neg_add_cancel
mul_comm := mul_comm
zsmul := (· • ·) }
instance {M : Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] :
Module (ArithmeticFunction R) (ArithmeticFunction M) where
one_smul := one_smul'
mul_smul := mul_smul'
smul_add r x y := by
ext
simp only [sum_add_distrib, smul_add, smul_apply, add_apply]
smul_zero r := by
ext
simp only [smul_apply, sum_const_zero, smul_zero, zero_apply]
add_smul r s x := by
ext
simp only [add_smul, sum_add_distrib, smul_apply, add_apply]
zero_smul r := by
ext
simp only [smul_apply, sum_const_zero, zero_smul, zero_apply]
section Zeta
/-- `ζ 0 = 0`, otherwise `ζ x = 1`. The Dirichlet Series is the Riemann `ζ`. -/
def zeta : ArithmeticFunction ℕ :=
⟨fun x => ite (x = 0) 0 1, rfl⟩
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction] notation "ζ" => ArithmeticFunction.zeta
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[ArithmeticFunction.zeta] notation "ζ" => ArithmeticFunction.zeta
@[simp]
theorem zeta_apply {x : ℕ} : ζ x = if x = 0 then 0 else 1 :=
rfl
theorem zeta_apply_ne {x : ℕ} (h : x ≠ 0) : ζ x = 1 :=
if_neg h
-- Porting note: removed `@[simp]`, LHS not in normal form
theorem coe_zeta_smul_apply {M} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [MulAction R M]
{f : ArithmeticFunction M} {x : ℕ} :
((↑ζ : ArithmeticFunction R) • f) x = ∑ i ∈ divisors x, f i := by
rw [smul_apply]
trans ∑ i ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal x, f i.snd
· refine sum_congr rfl fun i hi => ?_
rcases mem_divisorsAntidiagonal.1 hi with ⟨rfl, h⟩
rw [natCoe_apply, zeta_apply_ne (left_ne_zero_of_mul h), cast_one, one_smul]
· rw [← map_div_left_divisors, sum_map, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk]
theorem coe_zeta_mul_apply [Semiring R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {x : ℕ} :
(↑ζ * f) x = ∑ i ∈ divisors x, f i :=
coe_zeta_smul_apply
theorem coe_mul_zeta_apply [Semiring R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {x : ℕ} :
(f * ζ) x = ∑ i ∈ divisors x, f i := by
rw [mul_apply]
trans ∑ i ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal x, f i.1
· refine sum_congr rfl fun i hi => ?_
rcases mem_divisorsAntidiagonal.1 hi with ⟨rfl, h⟩
rw [natCoe_apply, zeta_apply_ne (right_ne_zero_of_mul h), cast_one, mul_one]
· rw [← map_div_right_divisors, sum_map, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk]
theorem zeta_mul_apply {f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} {x : ℕ} : (ζ * f) x = ∑ i ∈ divisors x, f i := by
rw [← natCoe_nat ζ, coe_zeta_mul_apply]
theorem mul_zeta_apply {f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} {x : ℕ} : (f * ζ) x = ∑ i ∈ divisors x, f i := by
rw [← natCoe_nat ζ, coe_mul_zeta_apply]
end Zeta
open ArithmeticFunction
section Pmul
/-- This is the pointwise product of `ArithmeticFunction`s. -/
def pmul [MulZeroClass R] (f g : ArithmeticFunction R) : ArithmeticFunction R :=
⟨fun x => f x * g x, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem pmul_apply [MulZeroClass R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} {x : ℕ} : f.pmul g x = f x * g x :=
rfl
theorem pmul_comm [CommMonoidWithZero R] (f g : ArithmeticFunction R) : f.pmul g = g.pmul f := by
ext
simp [mul_comm]
lemma pmul_assoc [SemigroupWithZero R] (f₁ f₂ f₃ : ArithmeticFunction R) :
pmul (pmul f₁ f₂) f₃ = pmul f₁ (pmul f₂ f₃) := by
ext
simp only [pmul_apply, mul_assoc]
section NonAssocSemiring
variable [NonAssocSemiring R]
@[simp]
theorem pmul_zeta (f : ArithmeticFunction R) : f.pmul ↑ζ = f := by
ext x
cases x <;> simp [Nat.succ_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem zeta_pmul (f : ArithmeticFunction R) : (ζ : ArithmeticFunction R).pmul f = f := by
ext x
cases x <;> simp [Nat.succ_ne_zero]
end NonAssocSemiring
variable [Semiring R]
/-- This is the pointwise power of `ArithmeticFunction`s. -/
def ppow (f : ArithmeticFunction R) (k : ℕ) : ArithmeticFunction R :=
if h0 : k = 0 then ζ else ⟨fun x ↦ f x ^ k, by simp_rw [map_zero, zero_pow h0]⟩
@[simp]
theorem ppow_zero {f : ArithmeticFunction R} : f.ppow 0 = ζ := by rw [ppow, dif_pos rfl]
@[simp]
theorem ppow_apply {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {k x : ℕ} (kpos : 0 < k) : f.ppow k x = f x ^ k := by
rw [ppow, dif_neg (Nat.ne_of_gt kpos), coe_mk]
theorem ppow_succ' {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {k : ℕ} : f.ppow (k + 1) = f.pmul (f.ppow k) := by
ext x
rw [ppow_apply (Nat.succ_pos k), _root_.pow_succ']
induction k <;> simp
theorem ppow_succ {f : ArithmeticFunction R} {k : ℕ} {kpos : 0 < k} :
f.ppow (k + 1) = (f.ppow k).pmul f := by
ext x
rw [ppow_apply (Nat.succ_pos k), _root_.pow_succ]
induction k <;> simp
end Pmul
section Pdiv
/-- This is the pointwise division of `ArithmeticFunction`s. -/
def pdiv [GroupWithZero R] (f g : ArithmeticFunction R) : ArithmeticFunction R :=
⟨fun n => f n / g n, by simp only [map_zero, ne_eq, not_true, div_zero]⟩
@[simp]
theorem pdiv_apply [GroupWithZero R] (f g : ArithmeticFunction R) (n : ℕ) :
pdiv f g n = f n / g n := rfl
/-- This result only holds for `DivisionSemiring`s instead of `GroupWithZero`s because zeta takes
values in ℕ, and hence the coercion requires an `AddMonoidWithOne`. TODO: Generalise zeta -/
@[simp]
theorem pdiv_zeta [DivisionSemiring R] (f : ArithmeticFunction R) :
pdiv f zeta = f := by
ext n
cases n <;> simp [succ_ne_zero]
end Pdiv
section ProdPrimeFactors
/-- The map $n \mapsto \prod_{p \mid n} f(p)$ as an arithmetic function -/
def prodPrimeFactors [CommMonoidWithZero R] (f : ℕ → R) : ArithmeticFunction R where
toFun d := if d = 0 then 0 else ∏ p ∈ d.primeFactors, f p
map_zero' := if_pos rfl
open Batteries.ExtendedBinder
/-- `∏ᵖ p ∣ n, f p` is custom notation for `prodPrimeFactors f n` -/
scoped syntax (name := bigproddvd) "∏ᵖ " extBinder " ∣ " term ", " term:67 : term
scoped macro_rules (kind := bigproddvd)
| `(∏ᵖ $x:ident ∣ $n, $r) => `(prodPrimeFactors (fun $x ↦ $r) $n)
@[simp]
theorem prodPrimeFactors_apply [CommMonoidWithZero R] {f : ℕ → R} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
∏ᵖ p ∣ n, f p = ∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, f p :=
if_neg hn
end ProdPrimeFactors
/-- Multiplicative functions -/
def IsMultiplicative [MonoidWithZero R] (f : ArithmeticFunction R) : Prop :=
f 1 = 1 ∧ ∀ {m n : ℕ}, m.Coprime n → f (m * n) = f m * f n
namespace IsMultiplicative
section MonoidWithZero
variable [MonoidWithZero R]
@[simp, arith_mult]
theorem map_one {f : ArithmeticFunction R} (h : f.IsMultiplicative) : f 1 = 1 :=
h.1
@[simp]
theorem map_mul_of_coprime {f : ArithmeticFunction R} (hf : f.IsMultiplicative) {m n : ℕ}
(h : m.Coprime n) : f (m * n) = f m * f n :=
hf.2 h
end MonoidWithZero
open scoped Function in -- required for scoped `on` notation
theorem map_prod {ι : Type*} [CommMonoidWithZero R] (g : ι → ℕ) {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(hf : f.IsMultiplicative) (s : Finset ι) (hs : (s : Set ι).Pairwise (Coprime on g)) :
f (∏ i ∈ s, g i) = ∏ i ∈ s, f (g i) := by
classical
induction s using Finset.induction_on with
| empty => simp [hf]
| insert _ _ has ih =>
rw [coe_insert, Set.pairwise_insert_of_symmetric (Coprime.symmetric.comap g)] at hs
rw [prod_insert has, prod_insert has, hf.map_mul_of_coprime, ih hs.1]
exact .prod_right fun i hi => hs.2 _ hi (hi.ne_of_not_mem has).symm
theorem map_prod_of_prime [CommMonoidWithZero R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(h_mult : ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative f)
(t : Finset ℕ) (ht : ∀ p ∈ t, p.Prime) :
f (∏ a ∈ t, a) = ∏ a ∈ t, f a :=
map_prod _ h_mult t fun x hx y hy hxy => (coprime_primes (ht x hx) (ht y hy)).mpr hxy
theorem map_prod_of_subset_primeFactors [CommMonoidWithZero R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(h_mult : ArithmeticFunction.IsMultiplicative f) (l : ℕ)
(t : Finset ℕ) (ht : t ⊆ l.primeFactors) :
f (∏ a ∈ t, a) = ∏ a ∈ t, f a :=
map_prod_of_prime h_mult t fun _ a => prime_of_mem_primeFactors (ht a)
theorem map_div_of_coprime [GroupWithZero R] {f : ArithmeticFunction R}
(hf : IsMultiplicative f) {l d : ℕ} (hdl : d ∣ l) (hl : (l / d).Coprime d) (hd : f d ≠ 0) :
f (l / d) = f l / f d := by
apply (div_eq_of_eq_mul hd ..).symm
rw [← hf.right hl, Nat.div_mul_cancel hdl]
@[arith_mult]
theorem natCast {f : ArithmeticFunction ℕ} [Semiring R] (h : f.IsMultiplicative) :
IsMultiplicative (f : ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨by simp [h], fun {m n} cop => by simp [h.2 cop]⟩
@[arith_mult]
theorem intCast {f : ArithmeticFunction ℤ} [Ring R] (h : f.IsMultiplicative) :
IsMultiplicative (f : ArithmeticFunction R) :=
⟨by simp [h], fun {m n} cop => by simp [h.2 cop]⟩
@[arith_mult]
theorem mul [CommSemiring R] {f g : ArithmeticFunction R} (hf : f.IsMultiplicative)
(hg : g.IsMultiplicative) : IsMultiplicative (f * g) := by
refine ⟨by simp [hf.1, hg.1], ?_⟩
simp only [mul_apply]
intro m n cop
rw [sum_mul_sum, ← sum_product']
symm
apply sum_nbij fun ((i, j), k, l) ↦ (i * k, j * l)
· rintro ⟨⟨a1, a2⟩, ⟨b1, b2⟩⟩ h
simp only [mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, Ne, mem_product] at h
rcases h with ⟨⟨rfl, ha⟩, ⟨rfl, hb⟩⟩
simp only [mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, Nat.mul_eq_zero, Ne]
constructor
· ring
rw [Nat.mul_eq_zero] at *
apply not_or_intro ha hb
· simp only [Set.InjOn, mem_coe, mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, Ne, mem_product, Prod.mk_inj]
rintro ⟨⟨a1, a2⟩, ⟨b1, b2⟩⟩ ⟨⟨rfl, ha⟩, ⟨rfl, hb⟩⟩ ⟨⟨c1, c2⟩, ⟨d1, d2⟩⟩ hcd h
simp only [Prod.mk_inj] at h
ext <;> dsimp only
· trans Nat.gcd (a1 * a2) (a1 * b1)
· rw [Nat.gcd_mul_left, cop.coprime_mul_left.coprime_mul_right_right.gcd_eq_one, mul_one]
· rw [← hcd.1.1, ← hcd.2.1] at cop
rw [← hcd.1.1, h.1, Nat.gcd_mul_left,
cop.coprime_mul_left.coprime_mul_right_right.gcd_eq_one, mul_one]
· trans Nat.gcd (a1 * a2) (a2 * b2)
· rw [mul_comm, Nat.gcd_mul_left, cop.coprime_mul_right.coprime_mul_left_right.gcd_eq_one,
mul_one]
· rw [← hcd.1.1, ← hcd.2.1] at cop
rw [← hcd.1.1, h.2, mul_comm, Nat.gcd_mul_left,
cop.coprime_mul_right.coprime_mul_left_right.gcd_eq_one, mul_one]
· trans Nat.gcd (b1 * b2) (a1 * b1)
· rw [mul_comm, Nat.gcd_mul_right,
cop.coprime_mul_right.coprime_mul_left_right.symm.gcd_eq_one, one_mul]
· rw [← hcd.1.1, ← hcd.2.1] at cop
| rw [← hcd.2.1, h.1, mul_comm c1 d1, Nat.gcd_mul_left,
cop.coprime_mul_right.coprime_mul_left_right.symm.gcd_eq_one, mul_one]
· trans Nat.gcd (b1 * b2) (a2 * b2)
· rw [Nat.gcd_mul_right, cop.coprime_mul_left.coprime_mul_right_right.symm.gcd_eq_one,
one_mul]
· rw [← hcd.1.1, ← hcd.2.1] at cop
rw [← hcd.2.1, h.2, Nat.gcd_mul_right,
cop.coprime_mul_left.coprime_mul_right_right.symm.gcd_eq_one, one_mul]
· simp only [Set.SurjOn, Set.subset_def, mem_coe, mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, Ne, mem_product,
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/ArithmeticFunction.lean | 629 | 637 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddTorsor
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
/-!
# Inversion in an affine space
In this file we define inversion in a sphere in an affine space. This map sends each point `x` to
the point `y` such that `y -ᵥ c = (R / dist x c) ^ 2 • (x -ᵥ c)`, where `c` and `R` are the center
and the radius the sphere.
In many applications, it is convenient to assume that the inversions swaps the center and the point
at infinity. In order to stay in the original affine space, we define the map so that it sends
center to itself.
Currently, we prove only a few basic lemmas needed to prove Ptolemy's inequality, see
`EuclideanGeometry.mul_dist_le_mul_dist_add_mul_dist`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Metric Function AffineMap Set AffineSubspace
open scoped Topology
variable {V P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P]
namespace EuclideanGeometry
variable {c x y : P} {R : ℝ}
/-- Inversion in a sphere in an affine space. This map sends each point `x` to the point `y` such
that `y -ᵥ c = (R / dist x c) ^ 2 • (x -ᵥ c)`, where `c` and `R` are the center and the radius the
sphere. -/
def inversion (c : P) (R : ℝ) (x : P) : P :=
(R / dist x c) ^ 2 • (x -ᵥ c) +ᵥ c
theorem inversion_def :
inversion = fun (c : P) (R : ℝ) (x : P) => (R / dist x c) ^ 2 • (x -ᵥ c) +ᵥ c :=
rfl
/-!
### Basic properties
In this section we prove that `EuclideanGeometry.inversion c R` is involutive and preserves the
sphere `Metric.sphere c R`. We also prove that the distance to the center of the image of `x` under
this inversion is given by `R ^ 2 / dist x c`.
-/
theorem inversion_eq_lineMap (c : P) (R : ℝ) (x : P) :
inversion c R x = lineMap c x ((R / dist x c) ^ 2) :=
rfl
theorem inversion_vsub_center (c : P) (R : ℝ) (x : P) :
inversion c R x -ᵥ c = (R / dist x c) ^ 2 • (x -ᵥ c) :=
vadd_vsub _ _
@[simp]
theorem inversion_self (c : P) (R : ℝ) : inversion c R c = c := by simp [inversion]
@[simp]
theorem inversion_zero_radius (c x : P) : inversion c 0 x = c := by simp [inversion]
theorem inversion_mul (c : P) (a R : ℝ) (x : P) :
inversion c (a * R) x = homothety c (a ^ 2) (inversion c R x) := by
simp only [inversion_eq_lineMap, ← homothety_eq_lineMap, ← homothety_mul_apply, mul_div_assoc,
mul_pow]
@[simp]
theorem inversion_dist_center (c x : P) : inversion c (dist x c) x = x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x c with (rfl | hne)
· apply inversion_self
· rw [inversion, div_self, one_pow, one_smul, vsub_vadd]
rwa [dist_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem inversion_dist_center' (c x : P) : inversion c (dist c x) x = x := by
rw [dist_comm, inversion_dist_center]
theorem inversion_of_mem_sphere (h : x ∈ Metric.sphere c R) : inversion c R x = x :=
h.out ▸ inversion_dist_center c x
/-- Distance from the image of a point under inversion to the center. This formula accidentally
works for `x = c`. -/
theorem dist_inversion_center (c x : P) (R : ℝ) : dist (inversion c R x) c = R ^ 2 / dist x c := by
rcases eq_or_ne x c with (rfl | hx)
· simp
have : dist x c ≠ 0 := dist_ne_zero.2 hx
-- was `field_simp [inversion, norm_smul, abs_div, ← dist_eq_norm_vsub, sq, mul_assoc]`,
-- but really slow. Replaced by `simp only ...` to speed up.
-- TODO(https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/15486): reinstate `field_simp` once it is faster.
simp (disch := field_simp_discharge) only [inversion, sq, mul_div_assoc', div_mul_eq_mul_div,
div_div, dist_vadd_left, norm_smul, norm_div, norm_mul, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_mul_abs_self,
abs_dist, ← dist_eq_norm_vsub, mul_assoc, eq_div_iff, div_eq_iff]
/-- Distance from the center of an inversion to the image of a point under the inversion. This
formula accidentally works for `x = c`. -/
theorem dist_center_inversion (c x : P) (R : ℝ) : dist c (inversion c R x) = R ^ 2 / dist c x := by
rw [dist_comm c, dist_comm c, dist_inversion_center]
@[simp]
theorem inversion_inversion (c : P) {R : ℝ} (hR : R ≠ 0) (x : P) :
inversion c R (inversion c R x) = x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x c with (rfl | hne)
· rw [inversion_self, inversion_self]
· rw [inversion, dist_inversion_center, inversion_vsub_center, smul_smul, ← mul_pow,
div_mul_div_comm, div_mul_cancel₀ _ (dist_ne_zero.2 hne), ← sq, div_self, one_pow, one_smul,
vsub_vadd]
exact pow_ne_zero _ hR
theorem inversion_involutive (c : P) {R : ℝ} (hR : R ≠ 0) : Involutive (inversion c R) :=
inversion_inversion c hR
theorem inversion_surjective (c : P) {R : ℝ} (hR : R ≠ 0) : Surjective (inversion c R) :=
(inversion_involutive c hR).surjective
theorem inversion_injective (c : P) {R : ℝ} (hR : R ≠ 0) : Injective (inversion c R) :=
(inversion_involutive c hR).injective
theorem inversion_bijective (c : P) {R : ℝ} (hR : R ≠ 0) : Bijective (inversion c R) :=
(inversion_involutive c hR).bijective
theorem inversion_eq_center (hR : R ≠ 0) : inversion c R x = c ↔ x = c :=
(inversion_injective c hR).eq_iff' <| inversion_self _ _
@[simp]
theorem inversion_eq_center' : inversion c R x = c ↔ x = c ∨ R = 0 := by
by_cases hR : R = 0 <;> simp [inversion_eq_center, hR]
theorem center_eq_inversion (hR : R ≠ 0) : c = inversion c R x ↔ x = c :=
eq_comm.trans (inversion_eq_center hR)
@[simp]
theorem center_eq_inversion' : c = inversion c R x ↔ x = c ∨ R = 0 :=
eq_comm.trans inversion_eq_center'
/-!
### Similarity of triangles
If inversion with center `O` sends `A` to `A'` and `B` to `B'`, then the triangle `OB'A'` is similar
to the triangle `OAB` with coefficient `R ^ 2 / (|OA|*|OB|)` and the triangle `OA'B` is similar to
the triangle `OAB'` with coefficient `|OB|/|OA|`. We formulate these statements in terms of ratios
of the lengths of their sides.
-/
/-- Distance between the images of two points under an inversion. -/
theorem dist_inversion_inversion (hx : x ≠ c) (hy : y ≠ c) (R : ℝ) :
dist (inversion c R x) (inversion c R y) = R ^ 2 / (dist x c * dist y c) * dist x y := by
dsimp only [inversion]
simp_rw [dist_vadd_cancel_right, dist_eq_norm_vsub V _ c]
simpa only [dist_vsub_cancel_right] using
dist_div_norm_sq_smul (vsub_ne_zero.2 hx) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hy) R
theorem dist_inversion_mul_dist_center_eq (hx : x ≠ c) (hy : y ≠ c) :
dist (inversion c R x) y * dist x c = dist x (inversion c R y) * dist y c := by
rcases eq_or_ne R 0 with rfl | hR; · simp [dist_comm, mul_comm]
have hy' : inversion c R y ≠ c := by simp [*]
conv in dist _ y => rw [← inversion_inversion c hR y]
rw [dist_inversion_inversion hx hy', dist_inversion_center]
have : dist x c ≠ 0 := dist_ne_zero.2 hx
-- used to be `field_simp`, but was really slow; replaced by `simp only ...` to speed up
-- TODO(https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/15486): reinstate `field_simp` once it is faster.
simp (disch := field_simp_discharge) only [mul_div_assoc', div_div_eq_mul_div, div_mul_eq_mul_div,
div_eq_iff]
ring
/-!
### Ptolemy's inequality
-/
include V in
/-- **Ptolemy's inequality**: in a quadrangle `ABCD`, `|AC| * |BD| ≤ |AB| * |CD| + |BC| * |AD|`. If
`ABCD` is a convex cyclic polygon, then this inequality becomes an equality, see
`EuclideanGeometry.mul_dist_add_mul_dist_eq_mul_dist_of_cospherical`. -/
theorem mul_dist_le_mul_dist_add_mul_dist (a b c d : P) :
dist a c * dist b d ≤ dist a b * dist c d + dist b c * dist a d := by
-- If one of the points `b`, `c`, `d` is equal to `a`, then the inequality is trivial.
rcases eq_or_ne b a with (rfl | hb)
· rw [dist_self, zero_mul, zero_add]
rcases eq_or_ne c a with (rfl | hc)
| · rw [dist_self, zero_mul]
apply_rules [add_nonneg, mul_nonneg, dist_nonneg]
rcases eq_or_ne d a with (rfl | hd)
· rw [dist_self, mul_zero, add_zero, dist_comm d, dist_comm d, mul_comm]
/- Otherwise, we apply the triangle inequality to `EuclideanGeometry.inversion a 1 b`,
`EuclideanGeometry.inversion a 1 c`, and `EuclideanGeometry.inversion a 1 d`. -/
have H := dist_triangle (inversion a 1 b) (inversion a 1 c) (inversion a 1 d)
rw [dist_inversion_inversion hb hd, dist_inversion_inversion hb hc,
dist_inversion_inversion hc hd, one_pow] at H
rw [← dist_pos] at hb hc hd
rw [← div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right (mul_pos hb (mul_pos hc hd))]
convert H using 1 <;> (field_simp [hb.ne', hc.ne', hd.ne', dist_comm a]; ring)
end EuclideanGeometry
open EuclideanGeometry
/-!
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Inversion/Basic.lean | 186 | 203 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Heather Macbeth, Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Intervals
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Uniform
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.NNReal.Lemmas
/-!
# Infinite sums in (semi)normed groups
In a complete (semi)normed group,
- `summable_iff_vanishing_norm`: a series `∑' i, f i` is summable if and only if for any `ε > 0`,
there exists a finite set `s` such that the sum `∑ i ∈ t, f i` over any finite set `t` disjoint
with `s` has norm less than `ε`;
- `Summable.of_norm_bounded`, `Summable.of_norm_bounded_eventually`: if `‖f i‖` is bounded above by
a summable series `∑' i, g i`, then `∑' i, f i` is summable as well; the same is true if the
inequality hold only off some finite set.
- `tsum_of_norm_bounded`, `HasSum.norm_le_of_bounded`: if `‖f i‖ ≤ g i`, where `∑' i, g i` is a
summable series, then `‖∑' i, f i‖ ≤ ∑' i, g i`.
## Tags
infinite series, absolute convergence, normed group
-/
open Topology NNReal
open Finset Filter Metric
variable {ι α E F : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [SeminormedAddCommGroup F]
theorem cauchySeq_finset_iff_vanishing_norm {f : ι → E} :
(CauchySeq fun s : Finset ι => ∑ i ∈ s, f i) ↔
∀ ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃ s : Finset ι, ∀ t, Disjoint t s → ‖∑ i ∈ t, f i‖ < ε := by
rw [cauchySeq_finset_iff_sum_vanishing, nhds_basis_ball.forall_iff]
· simp only [ball_zero_eq, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
· rintro s t hst ⟨s', hs'⟩
exact ⟨s', fun t' ht' => hst <| hs' _ ht'⟩
theorem summable_iff_vanishing_norm [CompleteSpace E] {f : ι → E} :
Summable f ↔ ∀ ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃ s : Finset ι, ∀ t, Disjoint t s → ‖∑ i ∈ t, f i‖ < ε := by
rw [summable_iff_cauchySeq_finset, cauchySeq_finset_iff_vanishing_norm]
theorem cauchySeq_finset_of_norm_bounded_eventually {f : ι → E} {g : ι → ℝ} (hg : Summable g)
(h : ∀ᶠ i in cofinite, ‖f i‖ ≤ g i) : CauchySeq fun s => ∑ i ∈ s, f i := by
refine cauchySeq_finset_iff_vanishing_norm.2 fun ε hε => ?_
rcases summable_iff_vanishing_norm.1 hg ε hε with ⟨s, hs⟩
classical
| refine ⟨s ∪ h.toFinset, fun t ht => ?_⟩
have : ∀ i ∈ t, ‖f i‖ ≤ g i := by
intro i hi
simp only [disjoint_left, mem_union, not_or, h.mem_toFinset, Set.mem_compl_iff,
Classical.not_not] at ht
exact (ht hi).2
calc
‖∑ i ∈ t, f i‖ ≤ ∑ i ∈ t, g i := norm_sum_le_of_le _ this
_ ≤ ‖∑ i ∈ t, g i‖ := le_abs_self _
_ < ε := hs _ (ht.mono_right le_sup_left)
theorem cauchySeq_finset_of_norm_bounded {f : ι → E} (g : ι → ℝ) (hg : Summable g)
(h : ∀ i, ‖f i‖ ≤ g i) : CauchySeq fun s : Finset ι => ∑ i ∈ s, f i :=
cauchySeq_finset_of_norm_bounded_eventually hg <| Eventually.of_forall h
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/InfiniteSum.lean | 54 | 68 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 David Wärn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Wärn
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.NatIso
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EqToHom
/-!
# Quotient category
Constructs the quotient of a category by an arbitrary family of relations on its hom-sets,
by introducing a type synonym for the objects, and identifying homs as necessary.
This is analogous to 'the quotient of a group by the normal closure of a subset', rather
than 'the quotient of a group by a normal subgroup'. When taking the quotient by a congruence
relation, `functor_map_eq_iff` says that no unnecessary identifications have been made.
-/
/-- A `HomRel` on `C` consists of a relation on every hom-set. -/
def HomRel (C) [Quiver C] :=
∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄, (X ⟶ Y) → (X ⟶ Y) → Prop
-- The `Inhabited` instance should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
instance (C) [Quiver C] : Inhabited (HomRel C) where
default := fun _ _ _ _ ↦ PUnit
namespace CategoryTheory
section
variable {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D] (F : C ⥤ D)
/-- A functor induces a `HomRel` on its domain, relating those maps that have the same image. -/
def Functor.homRel : HomRel C :=
fun _ _ f g ↦ F.map f = F.map g
@[simp]
lemma Functor.homRel_iff {X Y : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y) :
F.homRel f g ↔ F.map f = F.map g := Iff.rfl
end
variable {C : Type _} [Category C] (r : HomRel C)
/-- A `HomRel` is a congruence when it's an equivalence on every hom-set, and it can be composed
from left and right. -/
class Congruence : Prop where
/-- `r` is an equivalence on every hom-set. -/
equivalence : ∀ {X Y}, _root_.Equivalence (@r X Y)
/-- Precomposition with an arrow respects `r`. -/
compLeft : ∀ {X Y Z} (f : X ⟶ Y) {g g' : Y ⟶ Z}, r g g' → r (f ≫ g) (f ≫ g')
/-- Postcomposition with an arrow respects `r`. -/
compRight : ∀ {X Y Z} {f f' : X ⟶ Y} (g : Y ⟶ Z), r f f' → r (f ≫ g) (f' ≫ g)
/-- For `F : C ⥤ D`, `F.homRel` is a congruence. -/
instance Functor.congruence_homRel {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D] (F : C ⥤ D) :
Congruence F.homRel where
equivalence :=
{ refl := fun _ ↦ rfl
symm := by aesop
trans := by aesop }
compLeft := by aesop
compRight := by aesop
/-- A type synonym for `C`, thought of as the objects of the quotient category. -/
@[ext]
structure Quotient (r : HomRel C) where
/-- The object of `C`. -/
as : C
instance [Inhabited C] : Inhabited (Quotient r) :=
⟨{ as := default }⟩
namespace Quotient
/-- Generates the closure of a family of relations w.r.t. composition from left and right. -/
inductive CompClosure (r : HomRel C) ⦃s t : C⦄ : (s ⟶ t) → (s ⟶ t) → Prop
| intro {a b : C} (f : s ⟶ a) (m₁ m₂ : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ t) (h : r m₁ m₂) :
CompClosure r (f ≫ m₁ ≫ g) (f ≫ m₂ ≫ g)
theorem CompClosure.of {a b : C} (m₁ m₂ : a ⟶ b) (h : r m₁ m₂) : CompClosure r m₁ m₂ := by
simpa using CompClosure.intro (𝟙 _) m₁ m₂ (𝟙 _) h
theorem comp_left {a b c : C} (f : a ⟶ b) :
∀ (g₁ g₂ : b ⟶ c) (_ : CompClosure r g₁ g₂), CompClosure r (f ≫ g₁) (f ≫ g₂)
| _, _, ⟨x, m₁, m₂, y, h⟩ => by simpa using CompClosure.intro (f ≫ x) m₁ m₂ y h
theorem comp_right {a b c : C} (g : b ⟶ c) :
∀ (f₁ f₂ : a ⟶ b) (_ : CompClosure r f₁ f₂), CompClosure r (f₁ ≫ g) (f₂ ≫ g)
| _, _, ⟨x, m₁, m₂, y, h⟩ => by simpa using CompClosure.intro x m₁ m₂ (y ≫ g) h
/-- Hom-sets of the quotient category. -/
def Hom (s t : Quotient r) :=
Quot <| @CompClosure C _ r s.as t.as
instance (a : Quotient r) : Inhabited (Hom r a a) :=
⟨Quot.mk _ (𝟙 a.as)⟩
/-- Composition in the quotient category. -/
def comp ⦃a b c : Quotient r⦄ : Hom r a b → Hom r b c → Hom r a c := fun hf hg ↦
Quot.liftOn hf
(fun f ↦
Quot.liftOn hg (fun g ↦ Quot.mk _ (f ≫ g)) fun g₁ g₂ h ↦
Quot.sound <| comp_left r f g₁ g₂ h)
fun f₁ f₂ h ↦ Quot.inductionOn hg fun g ↦ Quot.sound <| comp_right r g f₁ f₂ h
@[simp]
theorem comp_mk {a b c : Quotient r} (f : a.as ⟶ b.as) (g : b.as ⟶ c.as) :
comp r (Quot.mk _ f) (Quot.mk _ g) = Quot.mk _ (f ≫ g) :=
rfl
-- Porting note: Had to manually add the proofs of `comp_id` `id_comp` and `assoc`
instance category : Category (Quotient r) where
Hom := Hom r
id a := Quot.mk _ (𝟙 a.as)
comp := @comp _ _ r
comp_id f := Quot.inductionOn f <| by simp
id_comp f := Quot.inductionOn f <| by simp
assoc f g h := Quot.inductionOn f <| Quot.inductionOn g <| Quot.inductionOn h <| by simp
/-- The functor from a category to its quotient. -/
def functor : C ⥤ Quotient r where
obj a := { as := a }
map := @fun _ _ f ↦ Quot.mk _ f
instance full_functor : (functor r).Full where
map_surjective f := ⟨Quot.out f, by simp [functor]⟩
instance essSurj_functor : (functor r).EssSurj where
mem_essImage Y :=
⟨Y.as, ⟨eqToIso (by
ext
rfl)⟩⟩
protected theorem induction {P : ∀ {a b : Quotient r}, (a ⟶ b) → Prop}
(h : ∀ {x y : C} (f : x ⟶ y), P ((functor r).map f)) :
∀ {a b : Quotient r} (f : a ⟶ b), P f := by
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩ ⟨f⟩
exact h f
protected theorem sound {a b : C} {f₁ f₂ : a ⟶ b} (h : r f₁ f₂) :
(functor r).map f₁ = (functor r).map f₂ := by
simpa using Quot.sound (CompClosure.intro (𝟙 a) f₁ f₂ (𝟙 b) h)
lemma compClosure_iff_self [h : Congruence r] {X Y : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y) :
CompClosure r f g ↔ r f g := by
constructor
· intro hfg
induction' hfg with m m' hm
| exact Congruence.compLeft _ (Congruence.compRight _ (by assumption))
· exact CompClosure.of _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem compClosure_eq_self [h : Congruence r] :
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Quotient.lean | 153 | 157 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.FundThmCalculus
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.Set
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-15")
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/SetIntegral.lean | 139 | 151 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Equiv.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Ker
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.RestrictScalars
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.ULift
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.CharZero
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Subring.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Int.CharZero
/-!
# Further basic results about `Algebra`.
This file could usefully be split further.
-/
universe u v w u₁ v₁
open Function
namespace Algebra
variable {R : Type u} {A : Type w}
section Semiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
section PUnit
instance _root_.PUnit.algebra : Algebra R PUnit.{v + 1} where
algebraMap :=
{ toFun _ := PUnit.unit
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' _ _ := rfl
map_zero' := rfl
map_add' _ _ := rfl }
commutes' _ _ := rfl
smul_def' _ _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_pUnit (r : R) : algebraMap R PUnit r = PUnit.unit :=
rfl
end PUnit
section ULift
instance _root_.ULift.algebra : Algebra R (ULift A) :=
{ ULift.module' with
algebraMap :=
{ (ULift.ringEquiv : ULift A ≃+* A).symm.toRingHom.comp (algebraMap R A) with
toFun := fun r => ULift.up (algebraMap R A r) }
commutes' := fun r x => ULift.down_injective <| Algebra.commutes r x.down
smul_def' := fun r x => ULift.down_injective <| Algebra.smul_def' r x.down }
theorem _root_.ULift.algebraMap_eq (r : R) :
algebraMap R (ULift A) r = ULift.up (algebraMap R A r) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem _root_.ULift.down_algebraMap (r : R) : (algebraMap R (ULift A) r).down = algebraMap R A r :=
rfl
end ULift
/-- Algebra over a subsemiring. This builds upon `Subsemiring.module`. -/
instance ofSubsemiring (S : Subsemiring R) : Algebra S A where
algebraMap := (algebraMap R A).comp S.subtype
smul := (· • ·)
commutes' r x := Algebra.commutes (r : R) x
smul_def' r x := Algebra.smul_def (r : R) x
theorem algebraMap_ofSubsemiring (S : Subsemiring R) :
(algebraMap S R : S →+* R) = Subsemiring.subtype S :=
rfl
theorem coe_algebraMap_ofSubsemiring (S : Subsemiring R) : (algebraMap S R : S → R) = Subtype.val :=
rfl
theorem algebraMap_ofSubsemiring_apply (S : Subsemiring R) (x : S) : algebraMap S R x = x :=
rfl
/-- Algebra over a subring. This builds upon `Subring.module`. -/
instance ofSubring {R A : Type*} [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A] (S : Subring R) :
Algebra S A where
algebraMap := (algebraMap R A).comp S.subtype
smul := (· • ·)
commutes' r x := Algebra.commutes (r : R) x
smul_def' r x := Algebra.smul_def (r : R) x
theorem algebraMap_ofSubring {R : Type*} [CommRing R] (S : Subring R) :
(algebraMap S R : S →+* R) = Subring.subtype S :=
rfl
theorem coe_algebraMap_ofSubring {R : Type*} [CommRing R] (S : Subring R) :
(algebraMap S R : S → R) = Subtype.val :=
rfl
theorem algebraMap_ofSubring_apply {R : Type*} [CommRing R] (S : Subring R) (x : S) :
algebraMap S R x = x :=
rfl
/-- Explicit characterization of the submonoid map in the case of an algebra.
`S` is made explicit to help with type inference -/
def algebraMapSubmonoid (S : Type*) [Semiring S] [Algebra R S] (M : Submonoid R) : Submonoid S :=
M.map (algebraMap R S)
theorem mem_algebraMapSubmonoid_of_mem {S : Type*} [Semiring S] [Algebra R S] {M : Submonoid R}
(x : M) : algebraMap R S x ∈ algebraMapSubmonoid S M :=
Set.mem_image_of_mem (algebraMap R S) x.2
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
theorem mul_sub_algebraMap_commutes [Ring A] [Algebra R A] (x : A) (r : R) :
x * (x - algebraMap R A r) = (x - algebraMap R A r) * x := by rw [mul_sub, ← commutes, sub_mul]
theorem mul_sub_algebraMap_pow_commutes [Ring A] [Algebra R A] (x : A) (r : R) (n : ℕ) :
x * (x - algebraMap R A r) ^ n = (x - algebraMap R A r) ^ n * x := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
rw [pow_succ', ← mul_assoc, mul_sub_algebraMap_commutes, mul_assoc, ih, ← mul_assoc]
end CommSemiring
section Ring
/-- A `Semiring` that is an `Algebra` over a commutative ring carries a natural `Ring` structure.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev semiringToRing (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] : Ring A :=
{ __ := (inferInstance : Semiring A)
__ := Module.addCommMonoidToAddCommGroup R
intCast := fun z => algebraMap R A z
intCast_ofNat := fun z => by simp only [Int.cast_natCast, map_natCast]
intCast_negSucc := fun z => by simp }
instance {R : Type*} [Ring R] : Algebra (Subring.center R) R where
algebraMap :=
{ toFun := Subtype.val
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' _ _ := rfl
map_zero' := rfl
map_add' _ _ := rfl }
commutes' r x := (Subring.mem_center_iff.1 r.2 x).symm
smul_def' _ _ := rfl
end Ring
end Algebra
open scoped Algebra
namespace Module
variable (R : Type u) (S : Type v) (M : Type w)
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring S] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [Module S M]
variable [SMulCommClass S R M] [SMul R S] [IsScalarTower R S M]
instance End.instAlgebra : Algebra R (Module.End S M) :=
Algebra.ofModule smul_mul_assoc fun r f g => (smul_comm r f g).symm
-- to prove this is a special case of the above
example : Algebra R (Module.End R M) := End.instAlgebra _ _ _
theorem algebraMap_end_eq_smul_id (a : R) : algebraMap R (End S M) a = a • LinearMap.id :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_end_apply (a : R) (m : M) : algebraMap R (End S M) a m = a • m :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ker_algebraMap_end (K : Type u) (V : Type v) [Semifield K] [AddCommMonoid V] [Module K V]
(a : K) (ha : a ≠ 0) : LinearMap.ker ((algebraMap K (End K V)) a) = ⊥ :=
LinearMap.ker_smul _ _ ha
section
variable {R M}
theorem End.algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff {x : R}
(h : IsUnit (algebraMap R (Module.End S M) x)) (m m' : M) :
(↑(h.unit⁻¹) : Module.End S M) m = m' ↔ m = x • m' where
mp H := H ▸ (isUnit_apply_inv_apply_of_isUnit h m).symm
mpr H :=
H.symm ▸ by
apply_fun ⇑h.unit.val using ((isUnit_iff _).mp h).injective
simpa using Module.End.isUnit_apply_inv_apply_of_isUnit h (x • m')
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-28")]
alias End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff := End.algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff
theorem End.algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff' {x : R}
(h : IsUnit (algebraMap R (Module.End S M) x)) (m m' : M) :
m' = (↑h.unit⁻¹ : Module.End S M) m ↔ m = x • m' where
mp H := H ▸ (isUnit_apply_inv_apply_of_isUnit h m).symm
mpr H :=
H.symm ▸ by
apply_fun (↑h.unit : M → M) using ((isUnit_iff _).mp h).injective
simpa using isUnit_apply_inv_apply_of_isUnit h (x • m') |>.symm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-28")]
alias End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff' := End.algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff'
end
end Module
namespace LinearMap
variable {R : Type*} {A : Type*} {B : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Semiring B]
[Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
/-- An alternate statement of `LinearMap.map_smul` for when `algebraMap` is more convenient to
work with than `•`. -/
theorem map_algebraMap_mul (f : A →ₗ[R] B) (a : A) (r : R) :
f (algebraMap R A r * a) = algebraMap R B r * f a := by
rw [← Algebra.smul_def, ← Algebra.smul_def, map_smul]
theorem map_mul_algebraMap (f : A →ₗ[R] B) (a : A) (r : R) :
f (a * algebraMap R A r) = f a * algebraMap R B r := by
rw [← Algebra.commutes, ← Algebra.commutes, map_algebraMap_mul]
end LinearMap
section Nat
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R]
-- Lower the priority so that `Algebra.id` is picked most of the time when working with
-- `ℕ`-algebras.
-- TODO: is this still needed?
/-- Semiring ⥤ ℕ-Alg -/
instance (priority := 99) Semiring.toNatAlgebra : Algebra ℕ R where
commutes' := Nat.cast_commute
smul_def' _ _ := nsmul_eq_mul _ _
algebraMap := Nat.castRingHom R
instance nat_algebra_subsingleton : Subsingleton (Algebra ℕ R) :=
⟨fun P Q => by ext; simp⟩
@[simp]
lemma algebraMap_comp_natCast (R A : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] :
algebraMap R A ∘ Nat.cast = Nat.cast := by
ext; simp
end Nat
section Int
variable (R : Type*) [Ring R]
-- Lower the priority so that `Algebra.id` is picked most of the time when working with
-- `ℤ`-algebras.
-- TODO: is this still needed?
/-- Ring ⥤ ℤ-Alg -/
instance (priority := 99) Ring.toIntAlgebra : Algebra ℤ R where
commutes' := Int.cast_commute
smul_def' _ _ := zsmul_eq_mul _ _
algebraMap := Int.castRingHom R
/-- A special case of `eq_intCast'` that happens to be true definitionally -/
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_int_eq : algebraMap ℤ R = Int.castRingHom R :=
rfl
variable {R}
instance int_algebra_subsingleton : Subsingleton (Algebra ℤ R) :=
⟨fun P Q => Algebra.algebra_ext P Q <| RingHom.congr_fun <| Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩
@[simp]
lemma algebraMap_comp_intCast (R A : Type*) [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A] :
algebraMap R A ∘ Int.cast = Int.cast := by
ext; simp
end Int
section FaithfulSMul
instance (R : Type*) [NonAssocSemiring R] : FaithfulSMul R R := ⟨fun {r₁ r₂} h ↦ by simpa using h 1⟩
variable (R A : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A]
lemma faithfulSMul_iff_injective_smul_one [Module R A] [IsScalarTower R A A] :
FaithfulSMul R A ↔ Injective (fun r : R ↦ r • (1 : A)) := by
refine ⟨fun ⟨h⟩ {r₁ r₂} hr ↦ h fun a ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ⟨fun {r₁ r₂} hr ↦ h ?_⟩⟩
· simp only at hr
rw [← one_mul a, ← smul_mul_assoc, ← smul_mul_assoc, hr]
· simpa using hr 1
variable [Algebra R A]
lemma faithfulSMul_iff_algebraMap_injective : FaithfulSMul R A ↔ Injective (algebraMap R A) := by
rw [faithfulSMul_iff_injective_smul_one, Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one']
variable [FaithfulSMul R A]
namespace FaithfulSMul
lemma algebraMap_injective : Injective (algebraMap R A) :=
(faithfulSMul_iff_algebraMap_injective R A).mp inferInstance
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-31")]
alias _root_.NoZeroSMulDivisors.algebraMap_injective := algebraMap_injective
@[simp]
lemma algebraMap_eq_zero_iff {r : R} : algebraMap R A r = 0 ↔ r = 0 :=
map_eq_zero_iff (algebraMap R A) <| algebraMap_injective R A
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-31")]
alias _root_.NoZeroSMulDivisors.algebraMap_eq_zero_iff := algebraMap_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
lemma algebraMap_eq_one_iff {r : R} : algebraMap R A r = 1 ↔ r = 1 :=
map_eq_one_iff _ <| FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective R A
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-31")]
alias _root_.NoZeroSMulDivisors.algebraMap_eq_one_iff := algebraMap_eq_one_iff
theorem _root_.NeZero.of_faithfulSMul (n : ℕ) [NeZero (n : R)] :
NeZero (n : A) :=
NeZero.nat_of_injective <| FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective R A
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-31")]
alias _root_.NeZero.of_noZeroSMulDivisors := NeZero.of_faithfulSMul
end FaithfulSMul
lemma Algebra.charZero_of_charZero [CharZero R] : CharZero A :=
have := algebraMap_comp_natCast R A
⟨this ▸ (FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective R A).comp CharZero.cast_injective⟩
-- see note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) [CharZero R] : FaithfulSMul ℕ R := by
simpa only [faithfulSMul_iff_algebraMap_injective] using (algebraMap ℕ R).injective_nat
-- see note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) (R : Type*) [Ring R] [CharZero R] : FaithfulSMul ℤ R := by
simpa only [faithfulSMul_iff_algebraMap_injective] using (algebraMap ℤ R).injective_int
| end FaithfulSMul
namespace NoZeroSMulDivisors
| Mathlib/Algebra/Algebra/Basic.lean | 353 | 355 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FiniteDimensional.Lemmas
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Metric
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Pointwise
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Doubling
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.Basic
/-!
# Relationship between the Haar and Lebesgue measures
We prove that the Haar measure and Lebesgue measure are equal on `ℝ` and on `ℝ^ι`, in
`MeasureTheory.addHaarMeasure_eq_volume` and `MeasureTheory.addHaarMeasure_eq_volume_pi`.
We deduce basic properties of any Haar measure on a finite dimensional real vector space:
* `map_linearMap_addHaar_eq_smul_addHaar`: a linear map rescales the Haar measure by the
absolute value of its determinant.
* `addHaar_preimage_linearMap` : when `f` is a linear map with nonzero determinant, the measure
of `f ⁻¹' s` is the measure of `s` multiplied by the absolute value of the inverse of the
determinant of `f`.
* `addHaar_image_linearMap` : when `f` is a linear map, the measure of `f '' s` is the
measure of `s` multiplied by the absolute value of the determinant of `f`.
* `addHaar_submodule` : a strict submodule has measure `0`.
* `addHaar_smul` : the measure of `r • s` is `|r| ^ dim * μ s`.
* `addHaar_ball`: the measure of `ball x r` is `r ^ dim * μ (ball 0 1)`.
* `addHaar_closedBall`: the measure of `closedBall x r` is `r ^ dim * μ (ball 0 1)`.
* `addHaar_sphere`: spheres have zero measure.
This makes it possible to associate a Lebesgue measure to an `n`-alternating map in dimension `n`.
This measure is called `AlternatingMap.measure`. Its main property is
`ω.measure_parallelepiped v`, stating that the associated measure of the parallelepiped spanned
by vectors `v₁, ..., vₙ` is given by `|ω v|`.
We also show that a Lebesgue density point `x` of a set `s` (with respect to closed balls) has
density one for the rescaled copies `{x} + r • t` of a given set `t` with positive measure, in
`tendsto_addHaar_inter_smul_one_of_density_one`. In particular, `s` intersects `{x} + r • t` for
small `r`, see `eventually_nonempty_inter_smul_of_density_one`.
Statements on integrals of functions with respect to an additive Haar measure can be found in
`MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.NormedSpace`.
-/
assert_not_exists MeasureTheory.integral
open TopologicalSpace Set Filter Metric Bornology
open scoped ENNReal Pointwise Topology NNReal
/-- The interval `[0,1]` as a compact set with non-empty interior. -/
def TopologicalSpace.PositiveCompacts.Icc01 : PositiveCompacts ℝ where
carrier := Icc 0 1
isCompact' := isCompact_Icc
interior_nonempty' := by simp_rw [interior_Icc, nonempty_Ioo, zero_lt_one]
universe u
/-- The set `[0,1]^ι` as a compact set with non-empty interior. -/
def TopologicalSpace.PositiveCompacts.piIcc01 (ι : Type*) [Finite ι] :
PositiveCompacts (ι → ℝ) where
carrier := pi univ fun _ => Icc 0 1
isCompact' := isCompact_univ_pi fun _ => isCompact_Icc
interior_nonempty' := by
simp only [interior_pi_set, Set.toFinite, interior_Icc, univ_pi_nonempty_iff, nonempty_Ioo,
imp_true_iff, zero_lt_one]
/-- The parallelepiped formed from the standard basis for `ι → ℝ` is `[0,1]^ι` -/
theorem Basis.parallelepiped_basisFun (ι : Type*) [Fintype ι] :
(Pi.basisFun ℝ ι).parallelepiped = TopologicalSpace.PositiveCompacts.piIcc01 ι :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by
refine Eq.trans ?_ ((uIcc_of_le ?_).trans (Set.pi_univ_Icc _ _).symm)
· classical convert parallelepiped_single (ι := ι) 1
· exact zero_le_one
/-- A parallelepiped can be expressed on the standard basis. -/
theorem Basis.parallelepiped_eq_map {ι E : Type*} [Fintype ι] [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace ℝ E] (b : Basis ι ℝ E) :
b.parallelepiped = (PositiveCompacts.piIcc01 ι).map b.equivFun.symm
b.equivFunL.symm.continuous b.equivFunL.symm.isOpenMap := by
classical
rw [← Basis.parallelepiped_basisFun, ← Basis.parallelepiped_map]
congr with x
simp [Pi.single_apply]
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure
theorem Basis.map_addHaar {ι E F : Type*} [Fintype ι] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace ℝ E] [NormedSpace ℝ F] [MeasurableSpace E] [MeasurableSpace F] [BorelSpace E]
[BorelSpace F] [SecondCountableTopology F] [SigmaCompactSpace F]
(b : Basis ι ℝ E) (f : E ≃L[ℝ] F) :
map f b.addHaar = (b.map f.toLinearEquiv).addHaar := by
have : IsAddHaarMeasure (map f b.addHaar) :=
AddEquiv.isAddHaarMeasure_map b.addHaar f.toAddEquiv f.continuous f.symm.continuous
rw [eq_comm, Basis.addHaar_eq_iff, Measure.map_apply f.continuous.measurable
(PositiveCompacts.isCompact _).measurableSet, Basis.coe_parallelepiped, Basis.coe_map]
erw [← image_parallelepiped, f.toEquiv.preimage_image, addHaar_self]
namespace MeasureTheory
open Measure TopologicalSpace.PositiveCompacts Module
/-!
### The Lebesgue measure is a Haar measure on `ℝ` and on `ℝ^ι`.
-/
/-- The Haar measure equals the Lebesgue measure on `ℝ`. -/
theorem addHaarMeasure_eq_volume : addHaarMeasure Icc01 = volume := by
convert (addHaarMeasure_unique volume Icc01).symm; simp [Icc01]
/-- The Haar measure equals the Lebesgue measure on `ℝ^ι`. -/
theorem addHaarMeasure_eq_volume_pi (ι : Type*) [Fintype ι] :
addHaarMeasure (piIcc01 ι) = volume := by
convert (addHaarMeasure_unique volume (piIcc01 ι)).symm
simp only [piIcc01, volume_pi_pi fun _ => Icc (0 : ℝ) 1, PositiveCompacts.coe_mk,
Compacts.coe_mk, Finset.prod_const_one, ENNReal.ofReal_one, Real.volume_Icc, one_smul, sub_zero]
theorem isAddHaarMeasure_volume_pi (ι : Type*) [Fintype ι] :
IsAddHaarMeasure (volume : Measure (ι → ℝ)) :=
inferInstance
namespace Measure
/-!
### Strict subspaces have zero measure
-/
open scoped Function -- required for scoped `on` notation
/-- If a set is disjoint of its translates by infinitely many bounded vectors, then it has measure
zero. This auxiliary lemma proves this assuming additionally that the set is bounded. -/
theorem addHaar_eq_zero_of_disjoint_translates_aux {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace ℝ E] [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] (μ : Measure E)
[IsAddHaarMeasure μ] {s : Set E} (u : ℕ → E) (sb : IsBounded s) (hu : IsBounded (range u))
(hs : Pairwise (Disjoint on fun n => {u n} + s)) (h's : MeasurableSet s) : μ s = 0 := by
by_contra h
apply lt_irrefl ∞
calc
∞ = ∑' _ : ℕ, μ s := (ENNReal.tsum_const_eq_top_of_ne_zero h).symm
_ = ∑' n : ℕ, μ ({u n} + s) := by
congr 1; ext1 n; simp only [image_add_left, measure_preimage_add, singleton_add]
_ = μ (⋃ n, {u n} + s) := Eq.symm <| measure_iUnion hs fun n => by
simpa only [image_add_left, singleton_add] using measurable_id.const_add _ h's
_ = μ (range u + s) := by rw [← iUnion_add, iUnion_singleton_eq_range]
_ < ∞ := (hu.add sb).measure_lt_top
/-- If a set is disjoint of its translates by infinitely many bounded vectors, then it has measure
zero. -/
theorem addHaar_eq_zero_of_disjoint_translates {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace ℝ E] [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] (μ : Measure E)
[IsAddHaarMeasure μ] {s : Set E} (u : ℕ → E) (hu : IsBounded (range u))
(hs : Pairwise (Disjoint on fun n => {u n} + s)) (h's : MeasurableSet s) : μ s = 0 := by
suffices H : ∀ R, μ (s ∩ closedBall 0 R) = 0 by
apply le_antisymm _ (zero_le _)
calc
μ s ≤ ∑' n : ℕ, μ (s ∩ closedBall 0 n) := by
conv_lhs => rw [← iUnion_inter_closedBall_nat s 0]
exact measure_iUnion_le _
_ = 0 := by simp only [H, tsum_zero]
intro R
apply addHaar_eq_zero_of_disjoint_translates_aux μ u
(isBounded_closedBall.subset inter_subset_right) hu _ (h's.inter measurableSet_closedBall)
refine pairwise_disjoint_mono hs fun n => ?_
exact add_subset_add Subset.rfl inter_subset_left
/-- A strict vector subspace has measure zero. -/
theorem addHaar_submodule {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [MeasurableSpace E]
[BorelSpace E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] (μ : Measure E) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ] (s : Submodule ℝ E)
(hs : s ≠ ⊤) : μ s = 0 := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ : ∃ x, x ∉ s := by
simpa only [Submodule.eq_top_iff', not_exists, Ne, not_forall] using hs
obtain ⟨c, cpos, cone⟩ : ∃ c : ℝ, 0 < c ∧ c < 1 := ⟨1 / 2, by norm_num, by norm_num⟩
have A : IsBounded (range fun n : ℕ => c ^ n • x) :=
have : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => c ^ n • x) atTop (𝓝 ((0 : ℝ) • x)) :=
(tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one cpos.le cone).smul_const x
isBounded_range_of_tendsto _ this
apply addHaar_eq_zero_of_disjoint_translates μ _ A _
(Submodule.closed_of_finiteDimensional s).measurableSet
intro m n hmn
simp only [Function.onFun, image_add_left, singleton_add, disjoint_left, mem_preimage,
SetLike.mem_coe]
intro y hym hyn
have A : (c ^ n - c ^ m) • x ∈ s := by
convert s.sub_mem hym hyn using 1
simp only [sub_smul, neg_sub_neg, add_sub_add_right_eq_sub]
have H : c ^ n - c ^ m ≠ 0 := by
simpa only [sub_eq_zero, Ne] using (pow_right_strictAnti₀ cpos cone).injective.ne hmn.symm
have : x ∈ s := by
convert s.smul_mem (c ^ n - c ^ m)⁻¹ A
rw [smul_smul, inv_mul_cancel₀ H, one_smul]
exact hx this
/-- A strict affine subspace has measure zero. -/
theorem addHaar_affineSubspace {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] (μ : Measure E) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ]
(s : AffineSubspace ℝ E) (hs : s ≠ ⊤) : μ s = 0 := by
rcases s.eq_bot_or_nonempty with (rfl | hne)
· rw [AffineSubspace.bot_coe, measure_empty]
rw [Ne, ← AffineSubspace.direction_eq_top_iff_of_nonempty hne] at hs
rcases hne with ⟨x, hx : x ∈ s⟩
simpa only [AffineSubspace.coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_right hx, vsub_eq_sub, sub_eq_add_neg,
image_add_right, neg_neg, measure_preimage_add_right] using addHaar_submodule μ s.direction hs
/-!
### Applying a linear map rescales Haar measure by the determinant
We first prove this on `ι → ℝ`, using that this is already known for the product Lebesgue
measure (thanks to matrices computations). Then, we extend this to any finite-dimensional real
vector space by using a linear equiv with a space of the form `ι → ℝ`, and arguing that such a
linear equiv maps Haar measure to Haar measure.
-/
theorem map_linearMap_addHaar_pi_eq_smul_addHaar {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] {f : (ι → ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] ι → ℝ}
(hf : LinearMap.det f ≠ 0) (μ : Measure (ι → ℝ)) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ] :
Measure.map f μ = ENNReal.ofReal (abs (LinearMap.det f)⁻¹) • μ := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
/- We have already proved the result for the Lebesgue product measure, using matrices.
We deduce it for any Haar measure by uniqueness (up to scalar multiplication). -/
have := addHaarMeasure_unique μ (piIcc01 ι)
rw [this, addHaarMeasure_eq_volume_pi, Measure.map_smul,
Real.map_linearMap_volume_pi_eq_smul_volume_pi hf, smul_comm]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E]
[FiniteDimensional ℝ E] (μ : Measure E) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ]
theorem map_linearMap_addHaar_eq_smul_addHaar {f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E} (hf : LinearMap.det f ≠ 0) :
Measure.map f μ = ENNReal.ofReal |(LinearMap.det f)⁻¹| • μ := by
-- we reduce to the case of `E = ι → ℝ`, for which we have already proved the result using
-- matrices in `map_linearMap_addHaar_pi_eq_smul_addHaar`.
let ι := Fin (finrank ℝ E)
haveI : FiniteDimensional ℝ (ι → ℝ) := by infer_instance
have : finrank ℝ E = finrank ℝ (ι → ℝ) := by simp [ι]
have e : E ≃ₗ[ℝ] ι → ℝ := LinearEquiv.ofFinrankEq E (ι → ℝ) this
-- next line is to avoid `g` getting reduced by `simp`.
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ : ∃ g, g = (e : E →ₗ[ℝ] ι → ℝ).comp (f.comp (e.symm : (ι → ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] E)) := ⟨_, rfl⟩
have gdet : LinearMap.det g = LinearMap.det f := by rw [hg]; exact LinearMap.det_conj f e
rw [← gdet] at hf ⊢
have fg : f = (e.symm : (ι → ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] E).comp (g.comp (e : E →ₗ[ℝ] ι → ℝ)) := by
ext x
simp only [LinearEquiv.coe_coe, Function.comp_apply, LinearMap.coe_comp,
LinearEquiv.symm_apply_apply, hg]
simp only [fg, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, LinearMap.coe_comp]
have Ce : Continuous e := (e : E →ₗ[ℝ] ι → ℝ).continuous_of_finiteDimensional
have Cg : Continuous g := LinearMap.continuous_of_finiteDimensional g
have Cesymm : Continuous e.symm := (e.symm : (ι → ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] E).continuous_of_finiteDimensional
rw [← map_map Cesymm.measurable (Cg.comp Ce).measurable, ← map_map Cg.measurable Ce.measurable]
haveI : IsAddHaarMeasure (map e μ) := (e : E ≃+ (ι → ℝ)).isAddHaarMeasure_map μ Ce Cesymm
have ecomp : e.symm ∘ e = id := by
ext x; simp only [id, Function.comp_apply, LinearEquiv.symm_apply_apply]
rw [map_linearMap_addHaar_pi_eq_smul_addHaar hf (map e μ), Measure.map_smul,
map_map Cesymm.measurable Ce.measurable, ecomp, Measure.map_id]
/-- The preimage of a set `s` under a linear map `f` with nonzero determinant has measure
equal to `μ s` times the absolute value of the inverse of the determinant of `f`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_preimage_linearMap {f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E} (hf : LinearMap.det f ≠ 0) (s : Set E) :
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = ENNReal.ofReal |(LinearMap.det f)⁻¹| * μ s :=
calc
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = Measure.map f μ s :=
((f.equivOfDetNeZero hf).toContinuousLinearEquiv.toHomeomorph.toMeasurableEquiv.map_apply
s).symm
_ = ENNReal.ofReal |(LinearMap.det f)⁻¹| * μ s := by
rw [map_linearMap_addHaar_eq_smul_addHaar μ hf]; rfl
/-- The preimage of a set `s` under a continuous linear map `f` with nonzero determinant has measure
equal to `μ s` times the absolute value of the inverse of the determinant of `f`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_preimage_continuousLinearMap {f : E →L[ℝ] E}
(hf : LinearMap.det (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E) ≠ 0) (s : Set E) :
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = ENNReal.ofReal (abs (LinearMap.det (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E))⁻¹) * μ s :=
addHaar_preimage_linearMap μ hf s
/-- The preimage of a set `s` under a linear equiv `f` has measure
equal to `μ s` times the absolute value of the inverse of the determinant of `f`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_preimage_linearEquiv (f : E ≃ₗ[ℝ] E) (s : Set E) :
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = ENNReal.ofReal |LinearMap.det (f.symm : E →ₗ[ℝ] E)| * μ s := by
have A : LinearMap.det (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E) ≠ 0 := (LinearEquiv.isUnit_det' f).ne_zero
convert addHaar_preimage_linearMap μ A s
simp only [LinearEquiv.det_coe_symm]
/-- The preimage of a set `s` under a continuous linear equiv `f` has measure
equal to `μ s` times the absolute value of the inverse of the determinant of `f`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_preimage_continuousLinearEquiv (f : E ≃L[ℝ] E) (s : Set E) :
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = ENNReal.ofReal |LinearMap.det (f.symm : E →ₗ[ℝ] E)| * μ s :=
addHaar_preimage_linearEquiv μ _ s
/-- The image of a set `s` under a linear map `f` has measure
equal to `μ s` times the absolute value of the determinant of `f`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_image_linearMap (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E) (s : Set E) :
μ (f '' s) = ENNReal.ofReal |LinearMap.det f| * μ s := by
rcases ne_or_eq (LinearMap.det f) 0 with (hf | hf)
· let g := (f.equivOfDetNeZero hf).toContinuousLinearEquiv
change μ (g '' s) = _
rw [ContinuousLinearEquiv.image_eq_preimage g s, addHaar_preimage_continuousLinearEquiv]
congr
· simp only [hf, zero_mul, ENNReal.ofReal_zero, abs_zero]
have : μ (LinearMap.range f) = 0 :=
addHaar_submodule μ _ (LinearMap.range_lt_top_of_det_eq_zero hf).ne
exact le_antisymm (le_trans (measure_mono (image_subset_range _ _)) this.le) (zero_le _)
/-- The image of a set `s` under a continuous linear map `f` has measure
equal to `μ s` times the absolute value of the determinant of `f`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_image_continuousLinearMap (f : E →L[ℝ] E) (s : Set E) :
μ (f '' s) = ENNReal.ofReal |LinearMap.det (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E)| * μ s :=
addHaar_image_linearMap μ _ s
/-- The image of a set `s` under a continuous linear equiv `f` has measure
equal to `μ s` times the absolute value of the determinant of `f`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_image_continuousLinearEquiv (f : E ≃L[ℝ] E) (s : Set E) :
μ (f '' s) = ENNReal.ofReal |LinearMap.det (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E)| * μ s :=
μ.addHaar_image_linearMap (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E) s
theorem LinearMap.quasiMeasurePreserving (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E) (hf : LinearMap.det f ≠ 0) :
QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ μ := by
refine ⟨f.continuous_of_finiteDimensional.measurable, ?_⟩
rw [map_linearMap_addHaar_eq_smul_addHaar μ hf]
exact smul_absolutelyContinuous
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.quasiMeasurePreserving (f : E →L[ℝ] E) (hf : f.det ≠ 0) :
QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ μ :=
LinearMap.quasiMeasurePreserving μ (f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E) hf
/-!
### Basic properties of Haar measures on real vector spaces
-/
theorem map_addHaar_smul {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
Measure.map (r • ·) μ = ENNReal.ofReal (abs (r ^ finrank ℝ E)⁻¹) • μ := by
let f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E := r • (1 : E →ₗ[ℝ] E)
change Measure.map f μ = _
have hf : LinearMap.det f ≠ 0 := by
simp only [f, mul_one, LinearMap.det_smul, Ne, MonoidHom.map_one]
intro h
exact hr (pow_eq_zero h)
simp only [f, map_linearMap_addHaar_eq_smul_addHaar μ hf, mul_one, LinearMap.det_smul, map_one]
theorem quasiMeasurePreserving_smul {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
QuasiMeasurePreserving (r • ·) μ μ := by
refine ⟨measurable_const_smul r, ?_⟩
rw [map_addHaar_smul μ hr]
exact smul_absolutelyContinuous
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_preimage_smul {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) (s : Set E) :
μ ((r • ·) ⁻¹' s) = ENNReal.ofReal (abs (r ^ finrank ℝ E)⁻¹) * μ s :=
calc
μ ((r • ·) ⁻¹' s) = Measure.map (r • ·) μ s :=
((Homeomorph.smul (isUnit_iff_ne_zero.2 hr).unit).toMeasurableEquiv.map_apply s).symm
_ = ENNReal.ofReal (abs (r ^ finrank ℝ E)⁻¹) * μ s := by
rw [map_addHaar_smul μ hr, coe_smul, Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul]
/-- Rescaling a set by a factor `r` multiplies its measure by `abs (r ^ dim)`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_smul (r : ℝ) (s : Set E) :
μ (r • s) = ENNReal.ofReal (abs (r ^ finrank ℝ E)) * μ s := by
rcases ne_or_eq r 0 with (h | rfl)
· rw [← preimage_smul_inv₀ h, addHaar_preimage_smul μ (inv_ne_zero h), inv_pow, inv_inv]
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | hs)
· simp only [measure_empty, mul_zero, smul_set_empty]
rw [zero_smul_set hs, ← singleton_zero]
by_cases h : finrank ℝ E = 0
· haveI : Subsingleton E := finrank_zero_iff.1 h
simp only [h, one_mul, ENNReal.ofReal_one, abs_one, Subsingleton.eq_univ_of_nonempty hs,
pow_zero, Subsingleton.eq_univ_of_nonempty (singleton_nonempty (0 : E))]
· haveI : Nontrivial E := nontrivial_of_finrank_pos (bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.2 h)
simp only [h, zero_mul, ENNReal.ofReal_zero, abs_zero, Ne, not_false_iff,
zero_pow, measure_singleton]
theorem addHaar_smul_of_nonneg {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) (s : Set E) :
μ (r • s) = ENNReal.ofReal (r ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ s := by
rw [addHaar_smul, abs_pow, abs_of_nonneg hr]
variable {μ} {s : Set E}
-- Note: We might want to rename this once we acquire the lemma corresponding to
-- `MeasurableSet.const_smul`
theorem NullMeasurableSet.const_smul (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (r : ℝ) :
NullMeasurableSet (r • s) μ := by
obtain rfl | hs' := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simp
obtain rfl | hr := eq_or_ne r 0
· simpa [zero_smul_set hs'] using nullMeasurableSet_singleton _
obtain ⟨t, ht, hst⟩ := hs
refine ⟨_, ht.const_smul_of_ne_zero hr, ?_⟩
rw [← measure_symmDiff_eq_zero_iff] at hst ⊢
rw [← smul_set_symmDiff₀ hr, addHaar_smul μ, hst, mul_zero]
variable (μ)
@[simp]
theorem addHaar_image_homothety (x : E) (r : ℝ) (s : Set E) :
μ (AffineMap.homothety x r '' s) = ENNReal.ofReal (abs (r ^ finrank ℝ E)) * μ s :=
calc
μ (AffineMap.homothety x r '' s) = μ ((fun y => y + x) '' (r • (fun y => y + -x) '' s)) := by
simp only [← image_smul, image_image, ← sub_eq_add_neg]; rfl
_ = ENNReal.ofReal (abs (r ^ finrank ℝ E)) * μ s := by
simp only [image_add_right, measure_preimage_add_right, addHaar_smul]
/-! We don't need to state `map_addHaar_neg` here, because it has already been proved for
general Haar measures on general commutative groups. -/
/-! ### Measure of balls -/
theorem addHaar_ball_center {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E]
(μ : Measure E) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ] (x : E) (r : ℝ) : μ (ball x r) = μ (ball (0 : E) r) := by
have : ball (0 : E) r = (x + ·) ⁻¹' ball x r := by simp [preimage_add_ball]
rw [this, measure_preimage_add]
theorem addHaar_real_ball_center {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [MeasurableSpace E]
[BorelSpace E] (μ : Measure E) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ] (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
μ.real (ball x r) = μ.real (ball (0 : E) r) := by
simp [measureReal_def, addHaar_ball_center]
theorem addHaar_closedBall_center {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [MeasurableSpace E]
[BorelSpace E] (μ : Measure E) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ] (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
μ (closedBall x r) = μ (closedBall (0 : E) r) := by
have : closedBall (0 : E) r = (x + ·) ⁻¹' closedBall x r := by simp [preimage_add_closedBall]
rw [this, measure_preimage_add]
theorem addHaar_real_closedBall_center {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [MeasurableSpace E]
[BorelSpace E] (μ : Measure E) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ] (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
μ.real (closedBall x r) = μ.real (closedBall (0 : E) r) := by
simp [measureReal_def, addHaar_closedBall_center]
theorem addHaar_ball_mul_of_pos (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (s : ℝ) :
μ (ball x (r * s)) = ENNReal.ofReal (r ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ (ball 0 s) := by
have : ball (0 : E) (r * s) = r • ball (0 : E) s := by
simp only [_root_.smul_ball hr.ne' (0 : E) s, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg hr.le, smul_zero]
simp only [this, addHaar_smul, abs_of_nonneg hr.le, addHaar_ball_center, abs_pow]
theorem addHaar_ball_of_pos (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
μ (ball x r) = ENNReal.ofReal (r ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ (ball 0 1) := by
rw [← addHaar_ball_mul_of_pos μ x hr, mul_one]
theorem addHaar_ball_mul [Nontrivial E] (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) (s : ℝ) :
μ (ball x (r * s)) = ENNReal.ofReal (r ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ (ball 0 s) := by
rcases hr.eq_or_lt with (rfl | h)
· simp only [zero_pow (finrank_pos (R := ℝ) (M := E)).ne', measure_empty, zero_mul,
ENNReal.ofReal_zero, ball_zero]
· exact addHaar_ball_mul_of_pos μ x h s
theorem addHaar_ball [Nontrivial E] (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
μ (ball x r) = ENNReal.ofReal (r ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ (ball 0 1) := by
rw [← addHaar_ball_mul μ x hr, mul_one]
theorem addHaar_closedBall_mul_of_pos (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (s : ℝ) :
μ (closedBall x (r * s)) = ENNReal.ofReal (r ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ (closedBall 0 s) := by
have : closedBall (0 : E) (r * s) = r • closedBall (0 : E) s := by
simp [smul_closedBall' hr.ne' (0 : E), abs_of_nonneg hr.le]
simp only [this, addHaar_smul, abs_of_nonneg hr.le, addHaar_closedBall_center, abs_pow]
theorem addHaar_closedBall_mul (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) {s : ℝ} (hs : 0 ≤ s) :
μ (closedBall x (r * s)) = ENNReal.ofReal (r ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ (closedBall 0 s) := by
have : closedBall (0 : E) (r * s) = r • closedBall (0 : E) s := by
simp [smul_closedBall r (0 : E) hs, abs_of_nonneg hr]
simp only [this, addHaar_smul, abs_of_nonneg hr, addHaar_closedBall_center, abs_pow]
/-- The measure of a closed ball can be expressed in terms of the measure of the closed unit ball.
Use instead `addHaar_closedBall`, which uses the measure of the open unit ball as a standard
form. -/
theorem addHaar_closedBall' (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
μ (closedBall x r) = ENNReal.ofReal (r ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ (closedBall 0 1) := by
rw [← addHaar_closedBall_mul μ x hr zero_le_one, mul_one]
theorem addHaar_real_closedBall' (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
μ.real (closedBall x r) = r ^ finrank ℝ E * μ.real (closedBall 0 1) := by
simp only [measureReal_def, addHaar_closedBall' μ x hr, ENNReal.toReal_mul, mul_eq_mul_right_iff,
ENNReal.toReal_ofReal_eq_iff]
left
positivity
theorem addHaar_unitClosedBall_eq_addHaar_unitBall :
μ (closedBall (0 : E) 1) = μ (ball 0 1) := by
apply le_antisymm _ (measure_mono ball_subset_closedBall)
have A : Tendsto
(fun r : ℝ => ENNReal.ofReal (r ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ (closedBall (0 : E) 1)) (𝓝[<] 1)
(𝓝 (ENNReal.ofReal ((1 : ℝ) ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ (closedBall (0 : E) 1))) := by
refine ENNReal.Tendsto.mul ?_ (by simp) tendsto_const_nhds (by simp)
exact ENNReal.tendsto_ofReal ((tendsto_id'.2 nhdsWithin_le_nhds).pow _)
simp only [one_pow, one_mul, ENNReal.ofReal_one] at A
refine le_of_tendsto A ?_
filter_upwards [Ioo_mem_nhdsLT zero_lt_one] with r hr
rw [← addHaar_closedBall' μ (0 : E) hr.1.le]
exact measure_mono (closedBall_subset_ball hr.2)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-01")]
alias addHaar_closed_unit_ball_eq_addHaar_unit_ball := addHaar_unitClosedBall_eq_addHaar_unitBall
theorem addHaar_closedBall (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
μ (closedBall x r) = ENNReal.ofReal (r ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ (ball 0 1) := by
rw [addHaar_closedBall' μ x hr, addHaar_unitClosedBall_eq_addHaar_unitBall]
theorem addHaar_real_closedBall (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
μ.real (closedBall x r) = r ^ finrank ℝ E * μ.real (ball 0 1) := by
simp [addHaar_real_closedBall' μ x hr, measureReal_def,
addHaar_unitClosedBall_eq_addHaar_unitBall]
theorem addHaar_closedBall_eq_addHaar_ball [Nontrivial E] (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
μ (closedBall x r) = μ (ball x r) := by
by_cases h : r < 0
· rw [Metric.closedBall_eq_empty.mpr h, Metric.ball_eq_empty.mpr h.le]
push_neg at h
rw [addHaar_closedBall μ x h, addHaar_ball μ x h]
theorem addHaar_real_closedBall_eq_addHaar_real_ball [Nontrivial E] (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
μ.real (closedBall x r) = μ.real (ball x r) := by
simp [measureReal_def, addHaar_closedBall_eq_addHaar_ball μ x r]
theorem addHaar_sphere_of_ne_zero (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) : μ (sphere x r) = 0 := by
rcases hr.lt_or_lt with (h | h)
· simp only [empty_diff, measure_empty, ← closedBall_diff_ball, closedBall_eq_empty.2 h]
· rw [← closedBall_diff_ball,
measure_diff ball_subset_closedBall measurableSet_ball.nullMeasurableSet
measure_ball_lt_top.ne,
addHaar_ball_of_pos μ _ h, addHaar_closedBall μ _ h.le, tsub_self]
theorem addHaar_sphere [Nontrivial E] (x : E) (r : ℝ) : μ (sphere x r) = 0 := by
rcases eq_or_ne r 0 with (rfl | h)
· rw [sphere_zero, measure_singleton]
· exact addHaar_sphere_of_ne_zero μ x h
theorem addHaar_singleton_add_smul_div_singleton_add_smul {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) (x y : E)
(s t : Set E) : μ ({x} + r • s) / μ ({y} + r • t) = μ s / μ t :=
calc
μ ({x} + r • s) / μ ({y} + r • t) = ENNReal.ofReal (|r| ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ s *
(ENNReal.ofReal (|r| ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ t)⁻¹ := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, addHaar_smul, image_add_left, measure_preimage_add, abs_pow,
singleton_add]
_ = ENNReal.ofReal (|r| ^ finrank ℝ E) * (ENNReal.ofReal (|r| ^ finrank ℝ E))⁻¹ *
(μ s * (μ t)⁻¹) := by
rw [ENNReal.mul_inv]
· ring
· simp only [pow_pos (abs_pos.mpr hr), ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero, not_le, Ne, true_or]
· simp only [ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top, true_or, Ne, not_false_iff]
_ = μ s / μ t := by
rw [ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel, one_mul, div_eq_mul_inv]
· simp only [pow_pos (abs_pos.mpr hr), ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero, not_le, Ne]
· simp only [ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top, Ne, not_false_iff]
instance (priority := 100) isUnifLocDoublingMeasureOfIsAddHaarMeasure :
IsUnifLocDoublingMeasure μ := by
refine ⟨⟨(2 : ℝ≥0) ^ finrank ℝ E, ?_⟩⟩
filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin] with r hr x
rw [addHaar_closedBall_mul μ x zero_le_two (le_of_lt hr), addHaar_closedBall_center μ x,
ENNReal.ofReal, Real.toNNReal_pow zero_le_two]
simp only [Real.toNNReal_ofNat, le_refl]
section
/-!
### The Lebesgue measure associated to an alternating map
-/
variable {ι G : Type*} [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι] [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace ℝ G]
[MeasurableSpace G] [BorelSpace G]
theorem addHaar_parallelepiped (b : Basis ι ℝ G) (v : ι → G) :
b.addHaar (parallelepiped v) = ENNReal.ofReal |b.det v| := by
have : FiniteDimensional ℝ G := FiniteDimensional.of_fintype_basis b
have A : parallelepiped v = b.constr ℕ v '' parallelepiped b := by
rw [image_parallelepiped]
exact congr_arg _ <| funext fun i ↦ (b.constr_basis ℕ v i).symm
rw [A, addHaar_image_linearMap, b.addHaar_self, mul_one, ← LinearMap.det_toMatrix b,
← Basis.toMatrix_eq_toMatrix_constr, Basis.det_apply]
variable [FiniteDimensional ℝ G] {n : ℕ} [_i : Fact (finrank ℝ G = n)]
/-- The Lebesgue measure associated to an alternating map. It gives measure `|ω v|` to the
parallelepiped spanned by the vectors `v₁, ..., vₙ`. Note that it is not always a Haar measure,
as it can be zero, but it is always locally finite and translation invariant. -/
noncomputable irreducible_def _root_.AlternatingMap.measure (ω : G [⋀^Fin n]→ₗ[ℝ] ℝ) :
Measure G :=
‖ω (finBasisOfFinrankEq ℝ G _i.out)‖₊ • (finBasisOfFinrankEq ℝ G _i.out).addHaar
theorem _root_.AlternatingMap.measure_parallelepiped (ω : G [⋀^Fin n]→ₗ[ℝ] ℝ)
(v : Fin n → G) : ω.measure (parallelepiped v) = ENNReal.ofReal |ω v| := by
conv_rhs => rw [ω.eq_smul_basis_det (finBasisOfFinrankEq ℝ G _i.out)]
simp only [addHaar_parallelepiped, AlternatingMap.measure, coe_nnreal_smul_apply,
AlternatingMap.smul_apply, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, abs_mul, ENNReal.ofReal_mul (abs_nonneg _),
← Real.enorm_eq_ofReal_abs, enorm]
instance (ω : G [⋀^Fin n]→ₗ[ℝ] ℝ) : IsAddLeftInvariant ω.measure := by
rw [AlternatingMap.measure]; infer_instance
instance (ω : G [⋀^Fin n]→ₗ[ℝ] ℝ) : IsLocallyFiniteMeasure ω.measure := by
rw [AlternatingMap.measure]; infer_instance
end
/-!
### Density points
Besicovitch covering theorem ensures that, for any locally finite measure on a finite-dimensional
real vector space, almost every point of a set `s` is a density point, i.e.,
`μ (s ∩ closedBall x r) / μ (closedBall x r)` tends to `1` as `r` tends to `0`
(see `Besicovitch.ae_tendsto_measure_inter_div`).
When `μ` is a Haar measure, one can deduce the same property for any rescaling sequence of sets,
of the form `{x} + r • t` where `t` is a set with positive finite measure, instead of the sequence
of closed balls.
We argue first for the dual property, i.e., if `s` has density `0` at `x`, then
`μ (s ∩ ({x} + r • t)) / μ ({x} + r • t)` tends to `0`. First when `t` is contained in the ball
of radius `1`, in `tendsto_addHaar_inter_smul_zero_of_density_zero_aux1`,
(by arguing by inclusion). Then when `t` is bounded, reducing to the previous one by rescaling, in
`tendsto_addHaar_inter_smul_zero_of_density_zero_aux2`.
Then for a general set `t`, by cutting it into a bounded part and a part with small measure, in
`tendsto_addHaar_inter_smul_zero_of_density_zero`.
Going to the complement, one obtains the desired property at points of density `1`, first when
`s` is measurable in `tendsto_addHaar_inter_smul_one_of_density_one_aux`, and then without this
assumption in `tendsto_addHaar_inter_smul_one_of_density_one` by applying the previous lemma to
the measurable hull `toMeasurable μ s`
-/
theorem tendsto_addHaar_inter_smul_zero_of_density_zero_aux1 (s : Set E) (x : E)
(h : Tendsto (fun r => μ (s ∩ closedBall x r) / μ (closedBall x r)) (𝓝[>] 0) (𝓝 0)) (t : Set E)
(u : Set E) (h'u : μ u ≠ 0) (t_bound : t ⊆ closedBall 0 1) :
Tendsto (fun r : ℝ => μ (s ∩ ({x} + r • t)) / μ ({x} + r • u)) (𝓝[>] 0) (𝓝 0) := by
have A : Tendsto (fun r : ℝ => μ (s ∩ ({x} + r • t)) / μ (closedBall x r)) (𝓝[>] 0) (𝓝 0) := by
apply
tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le' tendsto_const_nhds h
(Eventually.of_forall fun b => zero_le _)
filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin]
rintro r (rpos : 0 < r)
rw [← affinity_unitClosedBall rpos.le, singleton_add, ← image_vadd]
gcongr
have B :
Tendsto (fun r : ℝ => μ (closedBall x r) / μ ({x} + r • u)) (𝓝[>] 0)
(𝓝 (μ (closedBall x 1) / μ ({x} + u))) := by
apply tendsto_const_nhds.congr' _
filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin]
rintro r (rpos : 0 < r)
have : closedBall x r = {x} + r • closedBall (0 : E) 1 := by
simp only [_root_.smul_closedBall, Real.norm_of_nonneg rpos.le, zero_le_one, add_zero,
| mul_one, singleton_add_closedBall, smul_zero]
simp only [this, addHaar_singleton_add_smul_div_singleton_add_smul μ rpos.ne']
simp only [addHaar_closedBall_center, image_add_left, measure_preimage_add, singleton_add]
have C : Tendsto (fun r : ℝ =>
μ (s ∩ ({x} + r • t)) / μ (closedBall x r) * (μ (closedBall x r) / μ ({x} + r • u)))
(𝓝[>] 0) (𝓝 (0 * (μ (closedBall x 1) / μ ({x} + u)))) := by
apply ENNReal.Tendsto.mul A _ B (Or.inr ENNReal.zero_ne_top)
simp [ENNReal.div_eq_top, h'u, measure_closedBall_lt_top.ne]
simp only [zero_mul] at C
apply C.congr' _
filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin]
rintro r (rpos : 0 < r)
calc
μ (s ∩ ({x} + r • t)) / μ (closedBall x r) * (μ (closedBall x r) / μ ({x} + r • u)) =
μ (closedBall x r) * (μ (closedBall x r))⁻¹ * (μ (s ∩ ({x} + r • t)) / μ ({x} + r • u)) :=
by simp only [div_eq_mul_inv]; ring
_ = μ (s ∩ ({x} + r • t)) / μ ({x} + r • u) := by
rw [ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel (measure_closedBall_pos μ x rpos).ne'
measure_closedBall_lt_top.ne,
one_mul]
theorem tendsto_addHaar_inter_smul_zero_of_density_zero_aux2 (s : Set E) (x : E)
(h : Tendsto (fun r => μ (s ∩ closedBall x r) / μ (closedBall x r)) (𝓝[>] 0) (𝓝 0)) (t : Set E)
(u : Set E) (h'u : μ u ≠ 0) (R : ℝ) (Rpos : 0 < R) (t_bound : t ⊆ closedBall 0 R) :
Tendsto (fun r : ℝ => μ (s ∩ ({x} + r • t)) / μ ({x} + r • u)) (𝓝[>] 0) (𝓝 0) := by
set t' := R⁻¹ • t with ht'
set u' := R⁻¹ • u with hu'
have A : Tendsto (fun r : ℝ => μ (s ∩ ({x} + r • t')) / μ ({x} + r • u')) (𝓝[>] 0) (𝓝 0) := by
apply tendsto_addHaar_inter_smul_zero_of_density_zero_aux1 μ s x h t' u'
· simp only [u', h'u, (pow_pos Rpos _).ne', abs_nonpos_iff, addHaar_smul, not_false_iff,
ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero, inv_eq_zero, inv_pow, Ne, or_self_iff, mul_eq_zero]
· refine (smul_set_mono t_bound).trans_eq ?_
rw [smul_closedBall _ _ Rpos.le, smul_zero, Real.norm_of_nonneg (inv_nonneg.2 Rpos.le),
inv_mul_cancel₀ Rpos.ne']
have B : Tendsto (fun r : ℝ => R * r) (𝓝[>] 0) (𝓝[>] (R * 0)) := by
apply tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within
· exact (tendsto_const_nhds.mul tendsto_id).mono_left nhdsWithin_le_nhds
· filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin]
intro r rpos
rw [mul_zero]
exact mul_pos Rpos rpos
rw [mul_zero] at B
apply (A.comp B).congr' _
filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin]
rintro r -
have T : (R * r) • t' = r • t := by
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Lebesgue/EqHaar.lean | 643 | 688 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.FullyFaithful
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Limits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Pullback.CommSq
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.StrictInitial
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.FunctorCategory.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Constructions.FiniteProductsOfBinaryProducts
/-!
# Universal colimits and van Kampen colimits
## Main definitions
- `CategoryTheory.IsUniversalColimit`: A (colimit) cocone over a diagram `F : J ⥤ C` is universal
if it is stable under pullbacks.
- `CategoryTheory.IsVanKampenColimit`: A (colimit) cocone over a diagram `F : J ⥤ C` is van
Kampen if for every cocone `c'` over the pullback of the diagram `F' : J ⥤ C'`,
`c'` is colimiting iff `c'` is the pullback of `c`.
## References
- https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/van+Kampen+colimit
- [Stephen Lack and Paweł Sobociński, Adhesive Categories][adhesive2004]
-/
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace CategoryTheory
universe v' u' v u
variable {J : Type v'} [Category.{u'} J] {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable {K : Type*} [Category K] {D : Type*} [Category D]
section NatTrans
/-- A natural transformation is equifibered if every commutative square of the following form is
a pullback.
```
F(X) → F(Y)
↓ ↓
G(X) → G(Y)
```
-/
def NatTrans.Equifibered {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ G) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃i j : J⦄ (f : i ⟶ j), IsPullback (F.map f) (α.app i) (α.app j) (G.map f)
theorem NatTrans.equifibered_of_isIso {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ G) [IsIso α] : Equifibered α :=
fun _ _ f => IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨NatTrans.naturality _ f⟩
theorem NatTrans.Equifibered.comp {F G H : J ⥤ C} {α : F ⟶ G} {β : G ⟶ H} (hα : Equifibered α)
(hβ : Equifibered β) : Equifibered (α ≫ β) :=
fun _ _ f => (hα f).paste_vert (hβ f)
theorem NatTrans.Equifibered.whiskerRight {F G : J ⥤ C} {α : F ⟶ G} (hα : Equifibered α)
(H : C ⥤ D) [∀ (i j : J) (f : j ⟶ i), PreservesLimit (cospan (α.app i) (G.map f)) H] :
Equifibered (whiskerRight α H) :=
fun _ _ f => (hα f).map H
theorem NatTrans.Equifibered.whiskerLeft {K : Type*} [Category K] {F G : J ⥤ C} {α : F ⟶ G}
(hα : Equifibered α) (H : K ⥤ J) : Equifibered (whiskerLeft H α) :=
fun _ _ f => hα (H.map f)
theorem mapPair_equifibered {F F' : Discrete WalkingPair ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ F') :
NatTrans.Equifibered α := by
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨j⟩ ⟨⟨rfl : _ = j⟩⟩
all_goals
dsimp; simp only [Discrete.functor_map_id]
exact IsPullback.of_horiz_isIso ⟨by simp only [Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp]⟩
theorem NatTrans.equifibered_of_discrete {ι : Type*} {F G : Discrete ι ⥤ C}
(α : F ⟶ G) : NatTrans.Equifibered α := by
rintro ⟨i⟩ ⟨j⟩ ⟨⟨rfl : i = j⟩⟩
simp only [Discrete.functor_map_id]
exact IsPullback.of_horiz_isIso ⟨by rw [Category.id_comp, Category.comp_id]⟩
end NatTrans
/-- A (colimit) cocone over a diagram `F : J ⥤ C` is universal if it is stable under pullbacks. -/
def IsUniversalColimit {F : J ⥤ C} (c : Cocone F) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃F' : J ⥤ C⦄ (c' : Cocone F') (α : F' ⟶ F) (f : c'.pt ⟶ c.pt)
(_ : α ≫ c.ι = c'.ι ≫ (Functor.const J).map f) (_ : NatTrans.Equifibered α),
(∀ j : J, IsPullback (c'.ι.app j) (α.app j) f (c.ι.app j)) → Nonempty (IsColimit c')
/-- A (colimit) cocone over a diagram `F : J ⥤ C` is van Kampen if for every cocone `c'` over the
pullback of the diagram `F' : J ⥤ C'`, `c'` is colimiting iff `c'` is the pullback of `c`.
TODO: Show that this is iff the functor `C ⥤ Catᵒᵖ` sending `x` to `C/x` preserves it.
TODO: Show that this is iff the inclusion functor `C ⥤ Span(C)` preserves it.
-/
def IsVanKampenColimit {F : J ⥤ C} (c : Cocone F) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃F' : J ⥤ C⦄ (c' : Cocone F') (α : F' ⟶ F) (f : c'.pt ⟶ c.pt)
(_ : α ≫ c.ι = c'.ι ≫ (Functor.const J).map f) (_ : NatTrans.Equifibered α),
Nonempty (IsColimit c') ↔ ∀ j : J, IsPullback (c'.ι.app j) (α.app j) f (c.ι.app j)
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.isUniversal {F : J ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F} (H : IsVanKampenColimit c) :
IsUniversalColimit c :=
fun _ c' α f h hα => (H c' α f h hα).mpr
/-- A universal colimit is a colimit. -/
noncomputable def IsUniversalColimit.isColimit {F : J ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F}
(h : IsUniversalColimit c) : IsColimit c := by
refine ((h c (𝟙 F) (𝟙 c.pt :) (by rw [Functor.map_id, Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp])
(NatTrans.equifibered_of_isIso _)) fun j => ?_).some
haveI : IsIso (𝟙 c.pt) := inferInstance
exact IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨by simp⟩
/-- A van Kampen colimit is a colimit. -/
noncomputable def IsVanKampenColimit.isColimit {F : J ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F}
(h : IsVanKampenColimit c) : IsColimit c :=
h.isUniversal.isColimit
theorem IsInitial.isVanKampenColimit [HasStrictInitialObjects C] {X : C} (h : IsInitial X) :
IsVanKampenColimit (asEmptyCocone X) := by
intro F' c' α f hf hα
have : F' = Functor.empty C := by apply Functor.hext <;> rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩
subst this
haveI := h.isIso_to f
refine ⟨by rintro _ ⟨⟨⟩⟩,
fun _ => ⟨IsColimit.ofIsoColimit h (Cocones.ext (asIso f).symm <| by rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩)⟩⟩
section Functor
theorem IsUniversalColimit.of_iso {F : J ⥤ C} {c c' : Cocone F} (hc : IsUniversalColimit c)
(e : c ≅ c') : IsUniversalColimit c' := by
intro F' c'' α f h hα H
have : c'.ι ≫ (Functor.const J).map e.inv.hom = c.ι := by
ext j
exact e.inv.2 j
apply hc c'' α (f ≫ e.inv.1) (by rw [Functor.map_comp, ← reassoc_of% h, this]) hα
intro j
rw [← Category.comp_id (α.app j)]
have : IsIso e.inv.hom := Functor.map_isIso (Cocones.forget _) e.inv
exact (H j).paste_vert (IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨by simp⟩)
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.of_iso {F : J ⥤ C} {c c' : Cocone F} (H : IsVanKampenColimit c)
(e : c ≅ c') : IsVanKampenColimit c' := by
intro F' c'' α f h hα
have : c'.ι ≫ (Functor.const J).map e.inv.hom = c.ι := by
ext j
exact e.inv.2 j
rw [H c'' α (f ≫ e.inv.1) (by rw [Functor.map_comp, ← reassoc_of% h, this]) hα]
apply forall_congr'
intro j
conv_lhs => rw [← Category.comp_id (α.app j)]
haveI : IsIso e.inv.hom := Functor.map_isIso (Cocones.forget _) e.inv
exact (IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨by simp⟩).paste_vert_iff (NatTrans.congr_app h j).symm
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.precompose_isIso {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ G) [IsIso α]
{c : Cocone G} (hc : IsVanKampenColimit c) :
IsVanKampenColimit ((Cocones.precompose α).obj c) := by
intros F' c' α' f e hα
refine (hc c' (α' ≫ α) f ((Category.assoc _ _ _).trans e)
(hα.comp (NatTrans.equifibered_of_isIso _))).trans ?_
apply forall_congr'
intro j
simp only [Functor.const_obj_obj, NatTrans.comp_app,
Cocones.precompose_obj_pt, Cocones.precompose_obj_ι]
have : IsPullback (α.app j ≫ c.ι.app j) (α.app j) (𝟙 _) (c.ι.app j) :=
IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨Category.comp_id _⟩
rw [← IsPullback.paste_vert_iff this _, Category.comp_id]
exact (congr_app e j).symm
theorem IsUniversalColimit.precompose_isIso {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ G) [IsIso α]
{c : Cocone G} (hc : IsUniversalColimit c) :
IsUniversalColimit ((Cocones.precompose α).obj c) := by
intros F' c' α' f e hα H
apply (hc c' (α' ≫ α) f ((Category.assoc _ _ _).trans e)
(hα.comp (NatTrans.equifibered_of_isIso _)))
intro j
simp only [Functor.const_obj_obj, NatTrans.comp_app,
Cocones.precompose_obj_pt, Cocones.precompose_obj_ι]
rw [← Category.comp_id f]
exact (H j).paste_vert (IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨Category.comp_id _⟩)
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.precompose_isIso_iff {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ G) [IsIso α]
{c : Cocone G} : IsVanKampenColimit ((Cocones.precompose α).obj c) ↔ IsVanKampenColimit c :=
⟨fun hc ↦ IsVanKampenColimit.of_iso (IsVanKampenColimit.precompose_isIso (inv α) hc)
(Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp)),
IsVanKampenColimit.precompose_isIso α⟩
theorem IsUniversalColimit.of_mapCocone (G : C ⥤ D) {F : J ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F}
[PreservesLimitsOfShape WalkingCospan G] [ReflectsColimitsOfShape J G]
(hc : IsUniversalColimit (G.mapCocone c)) : IsUniversalColimit c :=
fun F' c' α f h hα H ↦
⟨isColimitOfReflects _ (hc (G.mapCocone c') (whiskerRight α G) (G.map f)
(by ext j; simpa using G.congr_map (NatTrans.congr_app h j))
(hα.whiskerRight G) (fun j ↦ (H j).map G)).some⟩
|
theorem IsVanKampenColimit.of_mapCocone (G : C ⥤ D) {F : J ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F}
[∀ (i j : J) (X : C) (f : X ⟶ F.obj j) (g : i ⟶ j), PreservesLimit (cospan f (F.map g)) G]
[∀ (i : J) (X : C) (f : X ⟶ c.pt), PreservesLimit (cospan f (c.ι.app i)) G]
[ReflectsLimitsOfShape WalkingCospan G]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/VanKampen.lean | 194 | 198 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Cauchy
/-!
# Uniform convergence
A sequence of functions `Fₙ` (with values in a metric space) converges uniformly on a set `s` to a
function `f` if, for all `ε > 0`, for all large enough `n`, one has for all `y ∈ s` the inequality
`dist (f y, Fₙ y) < ε`. Under uniform convergence, many properties of the `Fₙ` pass to the limit,
most notably continuity. We prove this in the file, defining the notion of uniform convergence
in the more general setting of uniform spaces, and with respect to an arbitrary indexing set
endowed with a filter (instead of just `ℕ` with `atTop`).
## Main results
Let `α` be a topological space, `β` a uniform space, `Fₙ` and `f` be functions from `α` to `β`
(where the index `n` belongs to an indexing type `ι` endowed with a filter `p`).
* `TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s`: the fact that `Fₙ` converges uniformly to `f` on `s`. This means
that, for any entourage `u` of the diagonal, for large enough `n` (with respect to `p`), one has
`(f y, Fₙ y) ∈ u` for all `y ∈ s`.
* `TendstoUniformly F f p`: same notion with `s = univ`.
* `TendstoUniformlyOn.continuousOn`: a uniform limit on a set of functions which are continuous
on this set is itself continuous on this set.
* `TendstoUniformly.continuous`: a uniform limit of continuous functions is continuous.
* `TendstoUniformlyOn.tendsto_comp`: If `Fₙ` tends uniformly to `f` on a set `s`, and `gₙ` tends
to `x` within `s`, then `Fₙ gₙ` tends to `f x` if `f` is continuous at `x` within `s`.
* `TendstoUniformly.tendsto_comp`: If `Fₙ` tends uniformly to `f`, and `gₙ` tends to `x`, then
`Fₙ gₙ` tends to `f x`.
Finally, we introduce the notion of a uniform Cauchy sequence, which is to uniform
convergence what a Cauchy sequence is to the usual notion of convergence.
## Implementation notes
We derive most of our initial results from an auxiliary definition `TendstoUniformlyOnFilter`.
This definition in and of itself can sometimes be useful, e.g., when studying the local behavior
of the `Fₙ` near a point, which would typically look like `TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p (𝓝 x)`.
Still, while this may be the "correct" definition (see
`tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter`), it is somewhat unwieldy to work with in
practice. Thus, we provide the more traditional definition in `TendstoUniformlyOn`.
## Tags
Uniform limit, uniform convergence, tends uniformly to
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology Uniformity Filter Set Uniform
variable {α β γ ι : Type*} [UniformSpace β]
variable {F : ι → α → β} {f : α → β} {s s' : Set α} {x : α} {p : Filter ι} {p' : Filter α}
/-!
### Different notions of uniform convergence
We define uniform convergence, on a set or in the whole space.
-/
/-- A sequence of functions `Fₙ` converges uniformly on a filter `p'` to a limiting function `f`
with respect to the filter `p` if, for any entourage of the diagonal `u`, one has
`p ×ˢ p'`-eventually `(f x, Fₙ x) ∈ u`. -/
def TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (F : ι → α → β) (f : α → β) (p : Filter ι) (p' : Filter α) :=
∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ n : ι × α in p ×ˢ p', (f n.snd, F n.fst n.snd) ∈ u
/--
A sequence of functions `Fₙ` converges uniformly on a filter `p'` to a limiting function `f` w.r.t.
filter `p` iff the function `(n, x) ↦ (f x, Fₙ x)` converges along `p ×ˢ p'` to the uniformity.
In other words: one knows nothing about the behavior of `x` in this limit besides it being in `p'`.
-/
theorem tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff_tendsto :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p' ↔
Tendsto (fun q : ι × α => (f q.2, F q.1 q.2)) (p ×ˢ p') (𝓤 β) :=
Iff.rfl
/-- A sequence of functions `Fₙ` converges uniformly on a set `s` to a limiting function `f` with
respect to the filter `p` if, for any entourage of the diagonal `u`, one has `p`-eventually
`(f x, Fₙ x) ∈ u` for all `x ∈ s`. -/
def TendstoUniformlyOn (F : ι → α → β) (f : α → β) (p : Filter ι) (s : Set α) :=
∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ x : α, x ∈ s → (f x, F n x) ∈ u
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s ↔ TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p (𝓟 s) := by
simp only [TendstoUniformlyOn, TendstoUniformlyOnFilter]
apply forall₂_congr
simp_rw [eventually_prod_principal_iff]
simp
alias ⟨TendstoUniformlyOn.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter, TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.tendstoUniformlyOn⟩ :=
tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter
/-- A sequence of functions `Fₙ` converges uniformly on a set `s` to a limiting function `f` w.r.t.
filter `p` iff the function `(n, x) ↦ (f x, Fₙ x)` converges along `p ×ˢ 𝓟 s` to the uniformity.
In other words: one knows nothing about the behavior of `x` in this limit besides it being in `s`.
-/
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendsto :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s ↔
Tendsto (fun q : ι × α => (f q.2, F q.1 q.2)) (p ×ˢ 𝓟 s) (𝓤 β) := by
simp [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter, tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff_tendsto]
/-- A sequence of functions `Fₙ` converges uniformly to a limiting function `f` with respect to a
filter `p` if, for any entourage of the diagonal `u`, one has `p`-eventually
`(f x, Fₙ x) ∈ u` for all `x`. -/
def TendstoUniformly (F : ι → α → β) (f : α → β) (p : Filter ι) :=
∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ x : α, (f x, F n x) ∈ u
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_univ : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p univ ↔ TendstoUniformly F f p := by
simp [TendstoUniformlyOn, TendstoUniformly]
theorem tendstoUniformly_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter :
TendstoUniformly F f p ↔ TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p ⊤ := by
rw [← tendstoUniformlyOn_univ, tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter, principal_univ]
theorem TendstoUniformly.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p ⊤ := by rwa [← tendstoUniformly_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter]
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformly_comp_coe :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s ↔ TendstoUniformly (fun i (x : s) => F i x) (f ∘ (↑)) p :=
forall₂_congr fun u _ => by simp
/-- A sequence of functions `Fₙ` converges uniformly to a limiting function `f` w.r.t.
filter `p` iff the function `(n, x) ↦ (f x, Fₙ x)` converges along `p ×ˢ ⊤` to the uniformity.
In other words: one knows nothing about the behavior of `x` in this limit.
-/
theorem tendstoUniformly_iff_tendsto :
TendstoUniformly F f p ↔ Tendsto (fun q : ι × α => (f q.2, F q.1 q.2)) (p ×ˢ ⊤) (𝓤 β) := by
simp [tendstoUniformly_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter, tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff_tendsto]
/-- Uniform convergence implies pointwise convergence. -/
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.tendsto_at (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p')
(hx : 𝓟 {x} ≤ p') : Tendsto (fun n => F n x) p <| 𝓝 (f x) := by
refine Uniform.tendsto_nhds_right.mpr fun u hu => mem_map.mpr ?_
filter_upwards [(h u hu).curry]
intro i h
simpa using h.filter_mono hx
/-- Uniform convergence implies pointwise convergence. -/
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.tendsto_at (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
Tendsto (fun n => F n x) p <| 𝓝 (f x) :=
h.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.tendsto_at
(le_principal_iff.mpr <| mem_principal.mpr <| singleton_subset_iff.mpr <| hx)
/-- Uniform convergence implies pointwise convergence. -/
theorem TendstoUniformly.tendsto_at (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) (x : α) :
Tendsto (fun n => F n x) p <| 𝓝 (f x) :=
h.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.tendsto_at le_top
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.mono_left {p'' : Filter ι} (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p')
(hp : p'' ≤ p) : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p'' p' := fun u hu =>
(h u hu).filter_mono (p'.prod_mono_left hp)
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.mono_right {p'' : Filter α} (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p')
(hp : p'' ≤ p') : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p'' := fun u hu =>
(h u hu).filter_mono (p.prod_mono_right hp)
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.mono (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s) (h' : s' ⊆ s) :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s' :=
tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.mpr
(h.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.mono_right (le_principal_iff.mpr <| mem_principal.mpr h'))
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.congr {F' : ι → α → β} (hf : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p')
(hff' : ∀ᶠ n : ι × α in p ×ˢ p', F n.fst n.snd = F' n.fst n.snd) :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F' f p p' := by
refine fun u hu => ((hf u hu).and hff').mono fun n h => ?_
rw [← h.right]
exact h.left
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.congr {F' : ι → α → β} (hf : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s)
(hff' : ∀ᶠ n in p, Set.EqOn (F n) (F' n) s) : TendstoUniformlyOn F' f p s := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter] at hf ⊢
refine hf.congr ?_
rw [eventually_iff] at hff' ⊢
simp only [Set.EqOn] at hff'
simp only [mem_prod_principal, hff', mem_setOf_eq]
lemma tendstoUniformly_congr {F' : ι → α → β} (hF : F =ᶠ[p] F') :
TendstoUniformly F f p ↔ TendstoUniformly F' f p := by
simp_rw [← tendstoUniformlyOn_univ] at *
have HF := EventuallyEq.exists_mem hF
exact ⟨fun h => h.congr (by aesop), fun h => h.congr (by simp_rw [eqOn_comm]; aesop)⟩
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.congr_right {g : α → β} (hf : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s)
(hfg : EqOn f g s) : TendstoUniformlyOn F g p s := fun u hu => by
filter_upwards [hf u hu] with i hi a ha using hfg ha ▸ hi a ha
protected theorem TendstoUniformly.tendstoUniformlyOn (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s :=
(tendstoUniformlyOn_univ.2 h).mono (subset_univ s)
/-- Composing on the right by a function preserves uniform convergence on a filter -/
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.comp (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p') (g : γ → α) :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (fun n => F n ∘ g) (f ∘ g) p (p'.comap g) := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff_tendsto] at h ⊢
exact h.comp (tendsto_id.prodMap tendsto_comap)
/-- Composing on the right by a function preserves uniform convergence on a set -/
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.comp (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s) (g : γ → α) :
TendstoUniformlyOn (fun n => F n ∘ g) (f ∘ g) p (g ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter] at h ⊢
simpa [TendstoUniformlyOn, comap_principal] using TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.comp h g
/-- Composing on the right by a function preserves uniform convergence -/
theorem TendstoUniformly.comp (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) (g : γ → α) :
TendstoUniformly (fun n => F n ∘ g) (f ∘ g) p := by
rw [tendstoUniformly_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter] at h ⊢
simpa [principal_univ, comap_principal] using h.comp g
/-- Composing on the left by a uniformly continuous function preserves
uniform convergence on a filter -/
theorem UniformContinuous.comp_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter [UniformSpace γ] {g : β → γ}
(hg : UniformContinuous g) (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p') :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (fun i => g ∘ F i) (g ∘ f) p p' := fun _u hu => h _ (hg hu)
/-- Composing on the left by a uniformly continuous function preserves
uniform convergence on a set -/
theorem UniformContinuous.comp_tendstoUniformlyOn [UniformSpace γ] {g : β → γ}
(hg : UniformContinuous g) (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s) :
TendstoUniformlyOn (fun i => g ∘ F i) (g ∘ f) p s := fun _u hu => h _ (hg hu)
/-- Composing on the left by a uniformly continuous function preserves uniform convergence -/
theorem UniformContinuous.comp_tendstoUniformly [UniformSpace γ] {g : β → γ}
(hg : UniformContinuous g) (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) :
TendstoUniformly (fun i => g ∘ F i) (g ∘ f) p := fun _u hu => h _ (hg hu)
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.prodMap {ι' α' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α' → β'}
{f' : α' → β'} {q : Filter ι'} {q' : Filter α'} (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p')
(h' : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F' f' q q') :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (fun i : ι × ι' => Prod.map (F i.1) (F' i.2)) (Prod.map f f') (p ×ˢ q)
(p' ×ˢ q') := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff_tendsto] at h h' ⊢
rw [uniformity_prod_eq_comap_prod, tendsto_comap_iff, ← map_swap4_prod, tendsto_map'_iff]
simpa using h.prodMap h'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.prod_map := TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.prodMap
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.prodMap {ι' α' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α' → β'}
{f' : α' → β'} {p' : Filter ι'} {s' : Set α'} (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s)
(h' : TendstoUniformlyOn F' f' p' s') :
TendstoUniformlyOn (fun i : ι × ι' => Prod.map (F i.1) (F' i.2)) (Prod.map f f') (p ×ˢ p')
(s ×ˢ s') := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter] at h h' ⊢
simpa only [prod_principal_principal] using h.prodMap h'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias TendstoUniformlyOn.prod_map := TendstoUniformlyOn.prodMap
theorem TendstoUniformly.prodMap {ι' α' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α' → β'}
{f' : α' → β'} {p' : Filter ι'} (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) (h' : TendstoUniformly F' f' p') :
TendstoUniformly (fun i : ι × ι' => Prod.map (F i.1) (F' i.2)) (Prod.map f f') (p ×ˢ p') := by
rw [← tendstoUniformlyOn_univ, ← univ_prod_univ] at *
exact h.prodMap h'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias TendstoUniformly.prod_map := TendstoUniformly.prodMap
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.prodMk {ι' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α → β'}
{f' : α → β'} {q : Filter ι'} (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p')
(h' : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F' f' q p') :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (fun (i : ι × ι') a => (F i.1 a, F' i.2 a)) (fun a => (f a, f' a))
(p ×ˢ q) p' :=
fun u hu => ((h.prodMap h') u hu).diag_of_prod_right
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.prod := TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.prodMk
protected theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.prodMk {ι' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α → β'}
{f' : α → β'} {p' : Filter ι'} (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s)
(h' : TendstoUniformlyOn F' f' p' s) :
TendstoUniformlyOn (fun (i : ι × ι') a => (F i.1 a, F' i.2 a)) (fun a => (f a, f' a)) (p ×ˢ p')
s :=
(congr_arg _ s.inter_self).mp ((h.prodMap h').comp fun a => (a, a))
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias TendstoUniformlyOn.prod := TendstoUniformlyOn.prodMk
theorem TendstoUniformly.prodMk {ι' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α → β'} {f' : α → β'}
{p' : Filter ι'} (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) (h' : TendstoUniformly F' f' p') :
TendstoUniformly (fun (i : ι × ι') a => (F i.1 a, F' i.2 a)) (fun a => (f a, f' a)) (p ×ˢ p') :=
(h.prodMap h').comp fun a => (a, a)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias TendstoUniformly.prod := TendstoUniformly.prodMk
/-- Uniform convergence on a filter `p'` to a constant function is equivalent to convergence in
`p ×ˢ p'`. -/
theorem tendsto_prod_filter_iff {c : β} :
Tendsto (↿F) (p ×ˢ p') (𝓝 c) ↔ TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F (fun _ => c) p p' := by
simp_rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, tendsto_comap_iff]
rfl
/-- Uniform convergence on a set `s` to a constant function is equivalent to convergence in
`p ×ˢ 𝓟 s`. -/
theorem tendsto_prod_principal_iff {c : β} :
Tendsto (↿F) (p ×ˢ 𝓟 s) (𝓝 c) ↔ TendstoUniformlyOn F (fun _ => c) p s := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter]
exact tendsto_prod_filter_iff
/-- Uniform convergence to a constant function is equivalent to convergence in `p ×ˢ ⊤`. -/
theorem tendsto_prod_top_iff {c : β} :
Tendsto (↿F) (p ×ˢ ⊤) (𝓝 c) ↔ TendstoUniformly F (fun _ => c) p := by
rw [tendstoUniformly_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter]
exact tendsto_prod_filter_iff
/-- Uniform convergence on the empty set is vacuously true -/
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_empty : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p ∅ := fun u _ => by simp
/-- Uniform convergence on a singleton is equivalent to regular convergence -/
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_singleton_iff_tendsto :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p {x} ↔ Tendsto (fun n : ι => F n x) p (𝓝 (f x)) := by
simp_rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendsto, Uniform.tendsto_nhds_right, tendsto_def]
exact forall₂_congr fun u _ => by simp [mem_prod_principal, preimage]
/-- If a sequence `g` converges to some `b`, then the sequence of constant functions
`fun n ↦ fun a ↦ g n` converges to the constant function `fun a ↦ b` on any set `s` -/
theorem Filter.Tendsto.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_const {g : ι → β} {b : β} (hg : Tendsto g p (𝓝 b))
(p' : Filter α) :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (fun n : ι => fun _ : α => g n) (fun _ : α => b) p p' := by
simpa only [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, tendsto_comap_iff] using hg.comp (tendsto_fst (g := p'))
/-- If a sequence `g` converges to some `b`, then the sequence of constant functions
`fun n ↦ fun a ↦ g n` converges to the constant function `fun a ↦ b` on any set `s` -/
theorem Filter.Tendsto.tendstoUniformlyOn_const {g : ι → β} {b : β} (hg : Tendsto g p (𝓝 b))
(s : Set α) : TendstoUniformlyOn (fun n : ι => fun _ : α => g n) (fun _ : α => b) p s :=
tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.mpr (hg.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_const (𝓟 s))
theorem UniformContinuousOn.tendstoUniformlyOn [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace γ] {U : Set α}
{V : Set β} {F : α → β → γ} (hF : UniformContinuousOn (↿F) (U ×ˢ V)) (hU : x ∈ U) :
TendstoUniformlyOn F (F x) (𝓝[U] x) V := by
set φ := fun q : α × β => ((x, q.2), q)
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendsto]
change Tendsto (Prod.map (↿F) ↿F ∘ φ) (𝓝[U] x ×ˢ 𝓟 V) (𝓤 γ)
simp only [nhdsWithin, Filter.prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, inf_assoc, comap_principal, inf_principal]
refine hF.comp (Tendsto.inf ?_ <| tendsto_principal_principal.2 fun x hx => ⟨⟨hU, hx.2⟩, hx⟩)
simp only [uniformity_prod_eq_comap_prod, tendsto_comap_iff, (· ∘ ·),
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, comap_comap]
exact tendsto_comap.prodMk (tendsto_diag_uniformity _ _)
theorem UniformContinuousOn.tendstoUniformly [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace γ] {U : Set α}
(hU : U ∈ 𝓝 x) {F : α → β → γ} (hF : UniformContinuousOn (↿F) (U ×ˢ (univ : Set β))) :
TendstoUniformly F (F x) (𝓝 x) := by
simpa only [tendstoUniformlyOn_univ, nhdsWithin_eq_nhds.2 hU]
using hF.tendstoUniformlyOn (mem_of_mem_nhds hU)
theorem UniformContinuous₂.tendstoUniformly [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace γ] {f : α → β → γ}
(h : UniformContinuous₂ f) : TendstoUniformly f (f x) (𝓝 x) :=
UniformContinuousOn.tendstoUniformly univ_mem <| by rwa [univ_prod_univ, uniformContinuousOn_univ]
/-- A sequence is uniformly Cauchy if eventually all of its pairwise differences are
uniformly bounded -/
def UniformCauchySeqOnFilter (F : ι → α → β) (p : Filter ι) (p' : Filter α) : Prop :=
∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ m : (ι × ι) × α in (p ×ˢ p) ×ˢ p', (F m.fst.fst m.snd, F m.fst.snd m.snd) ∈ u
/-- A sequence is uniformly Cauchy if eventually all of its pairwise differences are
uniformly bounded -/
def UniformCauchySeqOn (F : ι → α → β) (p : Filter ι) (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ m : ι × ι in p ×ˢ p, ∀ x : α, x ∈ s → (F m.fst x, F m.snd x) ∈ u
theorem uniformCauchySeqOn_iff_uniformCauchySeqOnFilter :
UniformCauchySeqOn F p s ↔ UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p (𝓟 s) := by
simp only [UniformCauchySeqOn, UniformCauchySeqOnFilter]
refine forall₂_congr fun u hu => ?_
rw [eventually_prod_principal_iff]
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.uniformCauchySeqOnFilter (hF : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s) :
UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p (𝓟 s) := by rwa [← uniformCauchySeqOn_iff_uniformCauchySeqOnFilter]
/-- A sequence that converges uniformly is also uniformly Cauchy -/
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.uniformCauchySeqOnFilter (hF : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p') :
UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p p' := by
intro u hu
rcases comp_symm_of_uniformity hu with ⟨t, ht, htsymm, htmem⟩
have := tendsto_swap4_prod.eventually ((hF t ht).prod_mk (hF t ht))
apply this.diag_of_prod_right.mono
simp only [and_imp, Prod.forall]
intro n1 n2 x hl hr
exact Set.mem_of_mem_of_subset (prodMk_mem_compRel (htsymm hl) hr) htmem
/-- A sequence that converges uniformly is also uniformly Cauchy -/
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.uniformCauchySeqOn (hF : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s) :
UniformCauchySeqOn F p s :=
uniformCauchySeqOn_iff_uniformCauchySeqOnFilter.mpr
hF.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.uniformCauchySeqOnFilter
/-- A uniformly Cauchy sequence converges uniformly to its limit -/
theorem UniformCauchySeqOnFilter.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_of_tendsto
(hF : UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p p')
(hF' : ∀ᶠ x : α in p', Tendsto (fun n => F n x) p (𝓝 (f x))) :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p' := by
rcases p.eq_or_neBot with rfl | _
· simp only [TendstoUniformlyOnFilter, bot_prod, eventually_bot, implies_true]
-- Proof idea: |f_n(x) - f(x)| ≤ |f_n(x) - f_m(x)| + |f_m(x) - f(x)|. We choose `n`
-- so that |f_n(x) - f_m(x)| is uniformly small across `s` whenever `m ≥ n`. Then for
-- a fixed `x`, we choose `m` sufficiently large such that |f_m(x) - f(x)| is small.
intro u hu
rcases comp_symm_of_uniformity hu with ⟨t, ht, htsymm, htmem⟩
-- We will choose n, x, and m simultaneously. n and x come from hF. m comes from hF'
-- But we need to promote hF' to the full product filter to use it
have hmc : ∀ᶠ x in (p ×ˢ p) ×ˢ p', Tendsto (fun n : ι => F n x.snd) p (𝓝 (f x.snd)) := by
rw [eventually_prod_iff]
exact ⟨fun _ => True, by simp, _, hF', by simp⟩
-- To apply filter operations we'll need to do some order manipulation
rw [Filter.eventually_swap_iff]
have := tendsto_prodAssoc.eventually (tendsto_prod_swap.eventually ((hF t ht).and hmc))
apply this.curry.mono
simp only [Equiv.prodAssoc_apply, eventually_and, eventually_const, Prod.snd_swap, Prod.fst_swap,
and_imp, Prod.forall]
-- Complete the proof
intro x n hx hm'
refine Set.mem_of_mem_of_subset (mem_compRel.mpr ?_) htmem
rw [Uniform.tendsto_nhds_right] at hm'
have := hx.and (hm' ht)
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := this.exists
exact ⟨F m x, ⟨hm.2, htsymm hm.1⟩⟩
/-- A uniformly Cauchy sequence converges uniformly to its limit -/
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.tendstoUniformlyOn_of_tendsto (hF : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s)
(hF' : ∀ x : α, x ∈ s → Tendsto (fun n => F n x) p (𝓝 (f x))) : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s :=
tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.mpr
(hF.uniformCauchySeqOnFilter.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_of_tendsto hF')
theorem UniformCauchySeqOnFilter.mono_left {p'' : Filter ι} (hf : UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p p')
(hp : p'' ≤ p) : UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p'' p' := by
intro u hu
have := (hf u hu).filter_mono (p'.prod_mono_left (Filter.prod_mono hp hp))
exact this.mono (by simp)
theorem UniformCauchySeqOnFilter.mono_right {p'' : Filter α} (hf : UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p p')
(hp : p'' ≤ p') : UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p p'' := fun u hu =>
have := (hf u hu).filter_mono ((p ×ˢ p).prod_mono_right hp)
this.mono (by simp)
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.mono (hf : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s) (hss' : s' ⊆ s) :
UniformCauchySeqOn F p s' := by
rw [uniformCauchySeqOn_iff_uniformCauchySeqOnFilter] at hf ⊢
exact hf.mono_right (le_principal_iff.mpr <| mem_principal.mpr hss')
/-- Composing on the right by a function preserves uniform Cauchy sequences -/
theorem UniformCauchySeqOnFilter.comp {γ : Type*} (hf : UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p p')
(g : γ → α) : UniformCauchySeqOnFilter (fun n => F n ∘ g) p (p'.comap g) := fun u hu => by
obtain ⟨pa, hpa, pb, hpb, hpapb⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.mp (hf u hu)
rw [eventually_prod_iff]
refine ⟨pa, hpa, pb ∘ g, ?_, fun hx _ hy => hpapb hx hy⟩
exact eventually_comap.mpr (hpb.mono fun x hx y hy => by simp only [hx, hy, Function.comp_apply])
/-- Composing on the right by a function preserves uniform Cauchy sequences -/
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.comp {γ : Type*} (hf : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s) (g : γ → α) :
UniformCauchySeqOn (fun n => F n ∘ g) p (g ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [uniformCauchySeqOn_iff_uniformCauchySeqOnFilter] at hf ⊢
simpa only [UniformCauchySeqOn, comap_principal] using hf.comp g
/-- Composing on the left by a uniformly continuous function preserves
uniform Cauchy sequences -/
theorem UniformContinuous.comp_uniformCauchySeqOn [UniformSpace γ] {g : β → γ}
(hg : UniformContinuous g) (hf : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s) :
UniformCauchySeqOn (fun n => g ∘ F n) p s := fun _u hu => hf _ (hg hu)
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.prodMap {ι' α' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α' → β'}
{p' : Filter ι'} {s' : Set α'} (h : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s)
(h' : UniformCauchySeqOn F' p' s') :
UniformCauchySeqOn (fun i : ι × ι' => Prod.map (F i.1) (F' i.2)) (p ×ˢ p') (s ×ˢ s') := by
intro u hu
rw [uniformity_prod_eq_prod, mem_map, mem_prod_iff] at hu
obtain ⟨v, hv, w, hw, hvw⟩ := hu
simp_rw [mem_prod, and_imp, Prod.forall, Prod.map_apply]
rw [← Set.image_subset_iff] at hvw
apply (tendsto_swap4_prod.eventually ((h v hv).prod_mk (h' w hw))).mono
intro x hx a b ha hb
exact hvw ⟨_, mk_mem_prod (hx.1 a ha) (hx.2 b hb), rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias UniformCauchySeqOn.prod_map := UniformCauchySeqOn.prodMap
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.prod {ι' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α → β'}
{p' : Filter ι'} (h : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s) (h' : UniformCauchySeqOn F' p' s) :
UniformCauchySeqOn (fun (i : ι × ι') a => (F i.fst a, F' i.snd a)) (p ×ˢ p') s :=
(congr_arg _ s.inter_self).mp ((h.prodMap h').comp fun a => (a, a))
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.prod' {β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι → α → β'}
(h : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s) (h' : UniformCauchySeqOn F' p s) :
UniformCauchySeqOn (fun (i : ι) a => (F i a, F' i a)) p s := fun u hu =>
have hh : Tendsto (fun x : ι => (x, x)) p (p ×ˢ p) := tendsto_diag
(hh.prodMap hh).eventually ((h.prod h') u hu)
/-- If a sequence of functions is uniformly Cauchy on a set, then the values at each point form
a Cauchy sequence. -/
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.cauchy_map [hp : NeBot p] (hf : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
Cauchy (map (fun i => F i x) p) := by
simp only [cauchy_map_iff, hp, true_and]
intro u hu
rw [mem_map]
filter_upwards [hf u hu] with p hp using hp x hx
/-- If a sequence of functions is uniformly Cauchy on a set, then the values at each point form
a Cauchy sequence. See `UniformCauchSeqOn.cauchy_map` for the non-`atTop` case. -/
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.cauchySeq [Nonempty ι] [SemilatticeSup ι]
(hf : UniformCauchySeqOn F atTop s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
CauchySeq fun i ↦ F i x :=
hf.cauchy_map (hp := atTop_neBot) hx
section SeqTendsto
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_of_seq_tendstoUniformlyOn {l : Filter ι} [l.IsCountablyGenerated]
(h : ∀ u : ℕ → ι, Tendsto u atTop l → TendstoUniformlyOn (fun n => F (u n)) f atTop s) :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f l s := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendsto, tendsto_iff_seq_tendsto]
intro u hu
rw [tendsto_prod_iff'] at hu
specialize h (fun n => (u n).fst) hu.1
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendsto] at h
| exact h.comp (tendsto_id.prodMk hu.2)
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.seq_tendstoUniformlyOn {l : Filter ι} (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f l s)
(u : ℕ → ι) (hu : Tendsto u atTop l) : TendstoUniformlyOn (fun n => F (u n)) f atTop s := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendsto] at h ⊢
exact h.comp ((hu.comp tendsto_fst).prodMk tendsto_snd)
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_seq_tendstoUniformlyOn {l : Filter ι} [l.IsCountablyGenerated] :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f l s ↔
∀ u : ℕ → ι, Tendsto u atTop l → TendstoUniformlyOn (fun n => F (u n)) f atTop s :=
⟨TendstoUniformlyOn.seq_tendstoUniformlyOn, tendstoUniformlyOn_of_seq_tendstoUniformlyOn⟩
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/UniformConvergence.lean | 516 | 527 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.MFDeriv.FDeriv
/-!
# Differentiability of specific functions
In this file, we establish differentiability results for
- continuous linear maps and continuous linear equivalences
- the identity
- constant functions
- products
- arithmetic operations (such as addition and scalar multiplication).
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Manifold
open Bundle Set Topology
section SpecificFunctions
/-! ### Differentiability of specific functions -/
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
-- declare a charted space `M` over the pair `(E, H)`.
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] {I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H} {M : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
-- declare a charted space `M'` over the pair `(E', H')`.
{E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H']
{I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'} {M' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M'] [ChartedSpace H' M']
-- declare a charted space `M''` over the pair `(E'', H'')`.
{E'' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E''] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'']
{H'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H''] {I'' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E'' H''} {M'' : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace M''] [ChartedSpace H'' M'']
-- declare a charted space `N` over the pair `(F, G)`.
{F : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] {G : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G]
{J : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 F G} {N : Type*} [TopologicalSpace N] [ChartedSpace G N]
-- declare a charted space `N'` over the pair `(F', G')`.
{F' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F'] {G' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G']
{J' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 F' G'} {N' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace N'] [ChartedSpace G' N']
-- F₁, F₂, F₃, F₄ are normed spaces
{F₁ : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup F₁] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F₁] {F₂ : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F₂]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 F₂] {F₃ : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F₃] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F₃] {F₄ : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup F₄] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F₄]
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
variable (f : E →L[𝕜] E') {s : Set E} {x : E}
protected theorem hasMFDerivWithinAt : HasMFDerivWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f s x f :=
f.hasFDerivWithinAt.hasMFDerivWithinAt
protected theorem hasMFDerivAt : HasMFDerivAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f x f :=
f.hasFDerivAt.hasMFDerivAt
protected theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt : MDifferentiableWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f s x :=
f.differentiableWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt
protected theorem mdifferentiableOn : MDifferentiableOn 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f s :=
f.differentiableOn.mdifferentiableOn
protected theorem mdifferentiableAt : MDifferentiableAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f x :=
f.differentiableAt.mdifferentiableAt
protected theorem mdifferentiable : MDifferentiable 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f :=
f.differentiable.mdifferentiable
theorem mfderiv_eq : mfderiv 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f x = f :=
f.hasMFDerivAt.mfderiv
theorem mfderivWithin_eq (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) s x) :
mfderivWithin 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f s x = f :=
f.hasMFDerivWithinAt.mfderivWithin hs
end ContinuousLinearMap
namespace ContinuousLinearEquiv
variable (f : E ≃L[𝕜] E') {s : Set E} {x : E}
protected theorem hasMFDerivWithinAt : HasMFDerivWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f s x (f : E →L[𝕜] E') :=
f.hasFDerivWithinAt.hasMFDerivWithinAt
protected theorem hasMFDerivAt : HasMFDerivAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f x (f : E →L[𝕜] E') :=
f.hasFDerivAt.hasMFDerivAt
protected theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt : MDifferentiableWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f s x :=
f.differentiableWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt
protected theorem mdifferentiableOn : MDifferentiableOn 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f s :=
f.differentiableOn.mdifferentiableOn
protected theorem mdifferentiableAt : MDifferentiableAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f x :=
f.differentiableAt.mdifferentiableAt
protected theorem mdifferentiable : MDifferentiable 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f :=
f.differentiable.mdifferentiable
theorem mfderiv_eq : mfderiv 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f x = (f : E →L[𝕜] E') :=
f.hasMFDerivAt.mfderiv
theorem mfderivWithin_eq (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) s x) :
mfderivWithin 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f s x = (f : E →L[𝕜] E') :=
f.hasMFDerivWithinAt.mfderivWithin hs
end ContinuousLinearEquiv
variable {s : Set M} {x : M}
section id
/-! #### Identity -/
theorem hasMFDerivAt_id (x : M) :
HasMFDerivAt I I (@id M) x (ContinuousLinearMap.id 𝕜 (TangentSpace I x)) := by
refine ⟨continuousAt_id, ?_⟩
have : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[range I] (extChartAt I x) x, (extChartAt I x ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm) y = y := by
apply Filter.mem_of_superset (extChartAt_target_mem_nhdsWithin x)
mfld_set_tac
apply HasFDerivWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq (hasFDerivWithinAt_id _ _) this
simp only [mfld_simps]
theorem hasMFDerivWithinAt_id (s : Set M) (x : M) :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I I (@id M) s x (ContinuousLinearMap.id 𝕜 (TangentSpace I x)) :=
(hasMFDerivAt_id x).hasMFDerivWithinAt
theorem mdifferentiableAt_id : MDifferentiableAt I I (@id M) x :=
(hasMFDerivAt_id x).mdifferentiableAt
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_id : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I (@id M) s x :=
mdifferentiableAt_id.mdifferentiableWithinAt
theorem mdifferentiable_id : MDifferentiable I I (@id M) := fun _ => mdifferentiableAt_id
theorem mdifferentiableOn_id : MDifferentiableOn I I (@id M) s :=
mdifferentiable_id.mdifferentiableOn
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mfderiv_id : mfderiv I I (@id M) x = ContinuousLinearMap.id 𝕜 (TangentSpace I x) :=
HasMFDerivAt.mfderiv (hasMFDerivAt_id x)
theorem mfderivWithin_id (hxs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) :
mfderivWithin I I (@id M) s x = ContinuousLinearMap.id 𝕜 (TangentSpace I x) := by
rw [MDifferentiable.mfderivWithin mdifferentiableAt_id hxs]
exact mfderiv_id
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem tangentMap_id : tangentMap I I (id : M → M) = id := by ext1 ⟨x, v⟩; simp [tangentMap]
theorem tangentMapWithin_id {p : TangentBundle I M} (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s p.proj) :
tangentMapWithin I I (id : M → M) s p = p := by
simp only [tangentMapWithin, id]
rw [mfderivWithin_id]
· rcases p with ⟨⟩; rfl
· exact hs
end id
section Const
/-! #### Constants -/
variable {c : M'}
theorem hasMFDerivAt_const (c : M') (x : M) :
HasMFDerivAt I I' (fun _ : M => c) x (0 : TangentSpace I x →L[𝕜] TangentSpace I' c) := by
refine ⟨continuous_const.continuousAt, ?_⟩
simp only [writtenInExtChartAt, Function.comp_def, hasFDerivWithinAt_const]
theorem hasMFDerivWithinAt_const (c : M') (s : Set M) (x : M) :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' (fun _ : M => c) s x (0 : TangentSpace I x →L[𝕜] TangentSpace I' c) :=
(hasMFDerivAt_const c x).hasMFDerivWithinAt
theorem mdifferentiableAt_const : MDifferentiableAt I I' (fun _ : M => c) x :=
(hasMFDerivAt_const c x).mdifferentiableAt
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_const : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' (fun _ : M => c) s x :=
mdifferentiableAt_const.mdifferentiableWithinAt
theorem mdifferentiable_const : MDifferentiable I I' fun _ : M => c := fun _ =>
mdifferentiableAt_const
theorem mdifferentiableOn_const : MDifferentiableOn I I' (fun _ : M => c) s :=
mdifferentiable_const.mdifferentiableOn
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mfderiv_const :
mfderiv I I' (fun _ : M => c) x = (0 : TangentSpace I x →L[𝕜] TangentSpace I' c) :=
HasMFDerivAt.mfderiv (hasMFDerivAt_const c x)
theorem mfderivWithin_const :
mfderivWithin I I' (fun _ : M => c) s x = (0 : TangentSpace I x →L[𝕜] TangentSpace I' c) :=
(hasMFDerivWithinAt_const _ _ _).mfderivWithin_eq_zero
end Const
section Prod
/-! ### Operations on the product of two manifolds -/
theorem hasMFDerivAt_fst (x : M × M') :
HasMFDerivAt (I.prod I') I Prod.fst x
(ContinuousLinearMap.fst 𝕜 (TangentSpace I x.1) (TangentSpace I' x.2)) := by
refine ⟨continuous_fst.continuousAt, ?_⟩
have :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[range (I.prod I')] extChartAt (I.prod I') x x,
(extChartAt I x.1 ∘ Prod.fst ∘ (extChartAt (I.prod I') x).symm) y = y.1 := by
/- porting note: was
apply Filter.mem_of_superset (extChartAt_target_mem_nhdsWithin (I.prod I') x)
mfld_set_tac
-/
filter_upwards [extChartAt_target_mem_nhdsWithin x] with y hy
rw [extChartAt_prod] at hy
exact (extChartAt I x.1).right_inv hy.1
apply HasFDerivWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq hasFDerivWithinAt_fst this
-- Porting note: next line was `simp only [mfld_simps]`
exact (extChartAt I x.1).right_inv <| (extChartAt I x.1).map_source (mem_extChartAt_source _)
theorem hasMFDerivWithinAt_fst (s : Set (M × M')) (x : M × M') :
HasMFDerivWithinAt (I.prod I') I Prod.fst s x
(ContinuousLinearMap.fst 𝕜 (TangentSpace I x.1) (TangentSpace I' x.2)) :=
(hasMFDerivAt_fst x).hasMFDerivWithinAt
theorem mdifferentiableAt_fst {x : M × M'} : MDifferentiableAt (I.prod I') I Prod.fst x :=
(hasMFDerivAt_fst x).mdifferentiableAt
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_fst {s : Set (M × M')} {x : M × M'} :
MDifferentiableWithinAt (I.prod I') I Prod.fst s x :=
mdifferentiableAt_fst.mdifferentiableWithinAt
theorem mdifferentiable_fst : MDifferentiable (I.prod I') I (Prod.fst : M × M' → M) := fun _ =>
mdifferentiableAt_fst
theorem mdifferentiableOn_fst {s : Set (M × M')} : MDifferentiableOn (I.prod I') I Prod.fst s :=
mdifferentiable_fst.mdifferentiableOn
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mfderiv_fst {x : M × M'} :
mfderiv (I.prod I') I Prod.fst x =
ContinuousLinearMap.fst 𝕜 (TangentSpace I x.1) (TangentSpace I' x.2) :=
(hasMFDerivAt_fst x).mfderiv
theorem mfderivWithin_fst {s : Set (M × M')} {x : M × M'}
(hxs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt (I.prod I') s x) :
mfderivWithin (I.prod I') I Prod.fst s x =
ContinuousLinearMap.fst 𝕜 (TangentSpace I x.1) (TangentSpace I' x.2) := by
rw [MDifferentiable.mfderivWithin mdifferentiableAt_fst hxs]; exact mfderiv_fst
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem tangentMap_prodFst {p : TangentBundle (I.prod I') (M × M')} :
tangentMap (I.prod I') I Prod.fst p = ⟨p.proj.1, p.2.1⟩ := by
simp [tangentMap]; rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-18")]
alias tangentMap_prod_fst := tangentMap_prodFst
theorem tangentMapWithin_prodFst {s : Set (M × M')} {p : TangentBundle (I.prod I') (M × M')}
(hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt (I.prod I') s p.proj) :
tangentMapWithin (I.prod I') I Prod.fst s p = ⟨p.proj.1, p.2.1⟩ := by
simp only [tangentMapWithin]
rw [mfderivWithin_fst]
· rcases p with ⟨⟩; rfl
· exact hs
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-18")]
alias tangentMapWithin_prod_fst := tangentMapWithin_prodFst
theorem hasMFDerivAt_snd (x : M × M') :
HasMFDerivAt (I.prod I') I' Prod.snd x
(ContinuousLinearMap.snd 𝕜 (TangentSpace I x.1) (TangentSpace I' x.2)) := by
refine ⟨continuous_snd.continuousAt, ?_⟩
have :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[range (I.prod I')] extChartAt (I.prod I') x x,
(extChartAt I' x.2 ∘ Prod.snd ∘ (extChartAt (I.prod I') x).symm) y = y.2 := by
/- porting note: was
apply Filter.mem_of_superset (extChartAt_target_mem_nhdsWithin (I.prod I') x)
mfld_set_tac
-/
filter_upwards [extChartAt_target_mem_nhdsWithin x] with y hy
rw [extChartAt_prod] at hy
exact (extChartAt I' x.2).right_inv hy.2
apply HasFDerivWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq hasFDerivWithinAt_snd this
-- Porting note: the next line was `simp only [mfld_simps]`
exact (extChartAt I' x.2).right_inv <| (extChartAt I' x.2).map_source (mem_extChartAt_source _)
theorem hasMFDerivWithinAt_snd (s : Set (M × M')) (x : M × M') :
HasMFDerivWithinAt (I.prod I') I' Prod.snd s x
(ContinuousLinearMap.snd 𝕜 (TangentSpace I x.1) (TangentSpace I' x.2)) :=
(hasMFDerivAt_snd x).hasMFDerivWithinAt
theorem mdifferentiableAt_snd {x : M × M'} : MDifferentiableAt (I.prod I') I' Prod.snd x :=
(hasMFDerivAt_snd x).mdifferentiableAt
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_snd {s : Set (M × M')} {x : M × M'} :
MDifferentiableWithinAt (I.prod I') I' Prod.snd s x :=
mdifferentiableAt_snd.mdifferentiableWithinAt
theorem mdifferentiable_snd : MDifferentiable (I.prod I') I' (Prod.snd : M × M' → M') := fun _ =>
mdifferentiableAt_snd
theorem mdifferentiableOn_snd {s : Set (M × M')} : MDifferentiableOn (I.prod I') I' Prod.snd s :=
mdifferentiable_snd.mdifferentiableOn
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mfderiv_snd {x : M × M'} :
mfderiv (I.prod I') I' Prod.snd x =
ContinuousLinearMap.snd 𝕜 (TangentSpace I x.1) (TangentSpace I' x.2) :=
(hasMFDerivAt_snd x).mfderiv
theorem mfderivWithin_snd {s : Set (M × M')} {x : M × M'}
(hxs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt (I.prod I') s x) :
mfderivWithin (I.prod I') I' Prod.snd s x =
ContinuousLinearMap.snd 𝕜 (TangentSpace I x.1) (TangentSpace I' x.2) := by
rw [MDifferentiable.mfderivWithin mdifferentiableAt_snd hxs]; exact mfderiv_snd
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.fst {f : N → M × M'} {s : Set N} {x : N}
(hf : MDifferentiableWithinAt J (I.prod I') f s x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt J I (fun x => (f x).1) s x :=
mdifferentiableAt_fst.comp_mdifferentiableWithinAt x hf
theorem MDifferentiableAt.fst {f : N → M × M'} {x : N} (hf : MDifferentiableAt J (I.prod I') f x) :
MDifferentiableAt J I (fun x => (f x).1) x :=
mdifferentiableAt_fst.comp x hf
theorem MDifferentiable.fst {f : N → M × M'} (hf : MDifferentiable J (I.prod I') f) :
MDifferentiable J I fun x => (f x).1 :=
mdifferentiable_fst.comp hf
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.snd {f : N → M × M'} {s : Set N} {x : N}
(hf : MDifferentiableWithinAt J (I.prod I') f s x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt J I' (fun x => (f x).2) s x :=
mdifferentiableAt_snd.comp_mdifferentiableWithinAt x hf
theorem MDifferentiableAt.snd {f : N → M × M'} {x : N} (hf : MDifferentiableAt J (I.prod I') f x) :
MDifferentiableAt J I' (fun x => (f x).2) x :=
mdifferentiableAt_snd.comp x hf
theorem MDifferentiable.snd {f : N → M × M'} (hf : MDifferentiable J (I.prod I') f) :
| MDifferentiable J I' fun x => (f x).2 :=
mdifferentiable_snd.comp hf
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_prod_iff (f : M → M' × N') :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I (I'.prod J') f s x ↔
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/MFDeriv/SpecificFunctions.lean | 349 | 353 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Patrick Massot, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.FundThmCalculus
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.IntegrationByParts
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/IntervalIntegral.lean | 400 | 403 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Hunter Monroe. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Hunter Monroe, Kyle Miller, Alena Gusakov
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.DeleteEdges
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Powerset
/-!
# Subgraphs of a simple graph
A subgraph of a simple graph consists of subsets of the graph's vertices and edges such that the
endpoints of each edge are present in the vertex subset. The edge subset is formalized as a
sub-relation of the adjacency relation of the simple graph.
## Main definitions
* `Subgraph G` is the type of subgraphs of a `G : SimpleGraph V`.
* `Subgraph.neighborSet`, `Subgraph.incidenceSet`, and `Subgraph.degree` are like their
`SimpleGraph` counterparts, but they refer to vertices from `G` to avoid subtype coercions.
* `Subgraph.coe` is the coercion from a `G' : Subgraph G` to a `SimpleGraph G'.verts`.
(In Lean 3 this could not be a `Coe` instance since the destination type depends on `G'`.)
* `Subgraph.IsSpanning` for whether a subgraph is a spanning subgraph and
`Subgraph.IsInduced` for whether a subgraph is an induced subgraph.
* Instances for `Lattice (Subgraph G)` and `BoundedOrder (Subgraph G)`.
* `SimpleGraph.toSubgraph`: If a `SimpleGraph` is a subgraph of another, then you can turn it
into a member of the larger graph's `SimpleGraph.Subgraph` type.
* Graph homomorphisms from a subgraph to a graph (`Subgraph.map_top`) and between subgraphs
(`Subgraph.map`).
## Implementation notes
* Recall that subgraphs are not determined by their vertex sets, so `SetLike` does not apply to
this kind of subobject.
## TODO
* Images of graph homomorphisms as subgraphs.
-/
universe u v
namespace SimpleGraph
/-- A subgraph of a `SimpleGraph` is a subset of vertices along with a restriction of the adjacency
relation that is symmetric and is supported by the vertex subset. They also form a bounded lattice.
Thinking of `V → V → Prop` as `Set (V × V)`, a set of darts (i.e., half-edges), then
`Subgraph.adj_sub` is that the darts of a subgraph are a subset of the darts of `G`. -/
@[ext]
structure Subgraph {V : Type u} (G : SimpleGraph V) where
/-- Vertices of the subgraph -/
verts : Set V
/-- Edges of the subgraph -/
Adj : V → V → Prop
adj_sub : ∀ {v w : V}, Adj v w → G.Adj v w
edge_vert : ∀ {v w : V}, Adj v w → v ∈ verts
symm : Symmetric Adj := by aesop_graph -- Porting note: Originally `by obviously`
initialize_simps_projections SimpleGraph.Subgraph (Adj → adj)
variable {ι : Sort*} {V : Type u} {W : Type v}
/-- The one-vertex subgraph. -/
@[simps]
protected def singletonSubgraph (G : SimpleGraph V) (v : V) : G.Subgraph where
verts := {v}
Adj := ⊥
adj_sub := False.elim
edge_vert := False.elim
symm _ _ := False.elim
/-- The one-edge subgraph. -/
@[simps]
def subgraphOfAdj (G : SimpleGraph V) {v w : V} (hvw : G.Adj v w) : G.Subgraph where
verts := {v, w}
Adj a b := s(v, w) = s(a, b)
adj_sub h := by
rw [← G.mem_edgeSet, ← h]
exact hvw
edge_vert {a b} h := by
apply_fun fun e ↦ a ∈ e at h
simp only [Sym2.mem_iff, true_or, eq_iff_iff, iff_true] at h
exact h
namespace Subgraph
variable {G : SimpleGraph V} {G₁ G₂ : G.Subgraph} {a b : V}
protected theorem loopless (G' : Subgraph G) : Irreflexive G'.Adj :=
fun v h ↦ G.loopless v (G'.adj_sub h)
theorem adj_comm (G' : Subgraph G) (v w : V) : G'.Adj v w ↔ G'.Adj w v :=
⟨fun x ↦ G'.symm x, fun x ↦ G'.symm x⟩
@[symm]
theorem adj_symm (G' : Subgraph G) {u v : V} (h : G'.Adj u v) : G'.Adj v u :=
G'.symm h
protected theorem Adj.symm {G' : Subgraph G} {u v : V} (h : G'.Adj u v) : G'.Adj v u :=
G'.symm h
protected theorem Adj.adj_sub {H : G.Subgraph} {u v : V} (h : H.Adj u v) : G.Adj u v :=
H.adj_sub h
protected theorem Adj.fst_mem {H : G.Subgraph} {u v : V} (h : H.Adj u v) : u ∈ H.verts :=
H.edge_vert h
protected theorem Adj.snd_mem {H : G.Subgraph} {u v : V} (h : H.Adj u v) : v ∈ H.verts :=
h.symm.fst_mem
protected theorem Adj.ne {H : G.Subgraph} {u v : V} (h : H.Adj u v) : u ≠ v :=
h.adj_sub.ne
theorem adj_congr_of_sym2 {H : G.Subgraph} {u v w x : V} (h2 : s(u, v) = s(w, x)) :
H.Adj u v ↔ H.Adj w x := by
simp only [Sym2.eq, Sym2.rel_iff', Prod.mk.injEq, Prod.swap_prod_mk] at h2
rcases h2 with hl | hr
· rw [hl.1, hl.2]
· rw [hr.1, hr.2, Subgraph.adj_comm]
/-- Coercion from `G' : Subgraph G` to a `SimpleGraph G'.verts`. -/
@[simps]
protected def coe (G' : Subgraph G) : SimpleGraph G'.verts where
Adj v w := G'.Adj v w
symm _ _ h := G'.symm h
loopless v h := loopless G v (G'.adj_sub h)
@[simp]
theorem coe_adj_sub (G' : Subgraph G) (u v : G'.verts) (h : G'.coe.Adj u v) : G.Adj u v :=
G'.adj_sub h
-- Given `h : H.Adj u v`, then `h.coe : H.coe.Adj ⟨u, _⟩ ⟨v, _⟩`.
protected theorem Adj.coe {H : G.Subgraph} {u v : V} (h : H.Adj u v) :
H.coe.Adj ⟨u, H.edge_vert h⟩ ⟨v, H.edge_vert h.symm⟩ := h
instance (G : SimpleGraph V) (H : Subgraph G) [DecidableRel H.Adj] : DecidableRel H.coe.Adj :=
fun a b ↦ ‹DecidableRel H.Adj› _ _
/-- A subgraph is called a *spanning subgraph* if it contains all the vertices of `G`. -/
def IsSpanning (G' : Subgraph G) : Prop :=
∀ v : V, v ∈ G'.verts
theorem isSpanning_iff {G' : Subgraph G} : G'.IsSpanning ↔ G'.verts = Set.univ :=
Set.eq_univ_iff_forall.symm
protected alias ⟨IsSpanning.verts_eq_univ, _⟩ := isSpanning_iff
/-- Coercion from `Subgraph G` to `SimpleGraph V`. If `G'` is a spanning
subgraph, then `G'.spanningCoe` yields an isomorphic graph.
In general, this adds in all vertices from `V` as isolated vertices. -/
@[simps]
protected def spanningCoe (G' : Subgraph G) : SimpleGraph V where
Adj := G'.Adj
symm := G'.symm
loopless v hv := G.loopless v (G'.adj_sub hv)
@[simp]
theorem Adj.of_spanningCoe {G' : Subgraph G} {u v : G'.verts} (h : G'.spanningCoe.Adj u v) :
G.Adj u v :=
G'.adj_sub h
lemma spanningCoe_le (G' : G.Subgraph) : G'.spanningCoe ≤ G := fun _ _ ↦ G'.3
theorem spanningCoe_inj : G₁.spanningCoe = G₂.spanningCoe ↔ G₁.Adj = G₂.Adj := by
simp [Subgraph.spanningCoe]
lemma mem_of_adj_spanningCoe {v w : V} {s : Set V} (G : SimpleGraph s)
(hadj : G.spanningCoe.Adj v w) : v ∈ s := by aesop
@[simp]
lemma spanningCoe_subgraphOfAdj {v w : V} (hadj : G.Adj v w) :
(G.subgraphOfAdj hadj).spanningCoe = fromEdgeSet {s(v, w)} := by
ext v w
aesop
/-- `spanningCoe` is equivalent to `coe` for a subgraph that `IsSpanning`. -/
@[simps]
def spanningCoeEquivCoeOfSpanning (G' : Subgraph G) (h : G'.IsSpanning) :
G'.spanningCoe ≃g G'.coe where
toFun v := ⟨v, h v⟩
invFun v := v
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl
/-- A subgraph is called an *induced subgraph* if vertices of `G'` are adjacent if
they are adjacent in `G`. -/
def IsInduced (G' : Subgraph G) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃v⦄, v ∈ G'.verts → ∀ ⦃w⦄, w ∈ G'.verts → G.Adj v w → G'.Adj v w
@[simp] protected lemma IsInduced.adj {G' : G.Subgraph} (hG' : G'.IsInduced) {a b : G'.verts} :
G'.Adj a b ↔ G.Adj a b :=
⟨coe_adj_sub _ _ _, hG' a.2 b.2⟩
/-- `H.support` is the set of vertices that form edges in the subgraph `H`. -/
def support (H : Subgraph G) : Set V := Rel.dom H.Adj
theorem mem_support (H : Subgraph G) {v : V} : v ∈ H.support ↔ ∃ w, H.Adj v w := Iff.rfl
theorem support_subset_verts (H : Subgraph G) : H.support ⊆ H.verts :=
fun _ ⟨_, h⟩ ↦ H.edge_vert h
/-- `G'.neighborSet v` is the set of vertices adjacent to `v` in `G'`. -/
def neighborSet (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) : Set V := {w | G'.Adj v w}
theorem neighborSet_subset (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) : G'.neighborSet v ⊆ G.neighborSet v :=
fun _ ↦ G'.adj_sub
theorem neighborSet_subset_verts (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) : G'.neighborSet v ⊆ G'.verts :=
fun _ h ↦ G'.edge_vert (adj_symm G' h)
@[simp]
theorem mem_neighborSet (G' : Subgraph G) (v w : V) : w ∈ G'.neighborSet v ↔ G'.Adj v w := Iff.rfl
/-- A subgraph as a graph has equivalent neighbor sets. -/
def coeNeighborSetEquiv {G' : Subgraph G} (v : G'.verts) :
G'.coe.neighborSet v ≃ G'.neighborSet v where
toFun w := ⟨w, w.2⟩
invFun w := ⟨⟨w, G'.edge_vert (G'.adj_symm w.2)⟩, w.2⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
/-- The edge set of `G'` consists of a subset of edges of `G`. -/
def edgeSet (G' : Subgraph G) : Set (Sym2 V) := Sym2.fromRel G'.symm
theorem edgeSet_subset (G' : Subgraph G) : G'.edgeSet ⊆ G.edgeSet :=
Sym2.ind (fun _ _ ↦ G'.adj_sub)
@[simp]
protected lemma mem_edgeSet {G' : Subgraph G} {v w : V} : s(v, w) ∈ G'.edgeSet ↔ G'.Adj v w := .rfl
@[simp] lemma edgeSet_coe {G' : G.Subgraph} : G'.coe.edgeSet = Sym2.map (↑) ⁻¹' G'.edgeSet := by
ext e; induction e using Sym2.ind; simp
lemma image_coe_edgeSet_coe (G' : G.Subgraph) : Sym2.map (↑) '' G'.coe.edgeSet = G'.edgeSet := by
rw [edgeSet_coe, Set.image_preimage_eq_iff]
rintro e he
induction e using Sym2.ind with | h a b =>
rw [Subgraph.mem_edgeSet] at he
exact ⟨s(⟨a, edge_vert _ he⟩, ⟨b, edge_vert _ he.symm⟩), Sym2.map_pair_eq ..⟩
theorem mem_verts_of_mem_edge {G' : Subgraph G} {e : Sym2 V} {v : V} (he : e ∈ G'.edgeSet)
(hv : v ∈ e) : v ∈ G'.verts := by
induction e
rcases Sym2.mem_iff.mp hv with (rfl | rfl)
· exact G'.edge_vert he
· exact G'.edge_vert (G'.symm he)
/-- The `incidenceSet` is the set of edges incident to a given vertex. -/
def incidenceSet (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) : Set (Sym2 V) := {e ∈ G'.edgeSet | v ∈ e}
theorem incidenceSet_subset_incidenceSet (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) :
G'.incidenceSet v ⊆ G.incidenceSet v :=
fun _ h ↦ ⟨G'.edgeSet_subset h.1, h.2⟩
theorem incidenceSet_subset (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) : G'.incidenceSet v ⊆ G'.edgeSet :=
fun _ h ↦ h.1
/-- Give a vertex as an element of the subgraph's vertex type. -/
abbrev vert (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) (h : v ∈ G'.verts) : G'.verts := ⟨v, h⟩
/--
Create an equal copy of a subgraph (see `copy_eq`) with possibly different definitional equalities.
See Note [range copy pattern].
-/
def copy (G' : Subgraph G) (V'' : Set V) (hV : V'' = G'.verts)
(adj' : V → V → Prop) (hadj : adj' = G'.Adj) : Subgraph G where
verts := V''
Adj := adj'
adj_sub := hadj.symm ▸ G'.adj_sub
edge_vert := hV.symm ▸ hadj.symm ▸ G'.edge_vert
symm := hadj.symm ▸ G'.symm
theorem copy_eq (G' : Subgraph G) (V'' : Set V) (hV : V'' = G'.verts)
(adj' : V → V → Prop) (hadj : adj' = G'.Adj) : G'.copy V'' hV adj' hadj = G' :=
Subgraph.ext hV hadj
/-- The union of two subgraphs. -/
instance : Max G.Subgraph where
max G₁ G₂ :=
{ verts := G₁.verts ∪ G₂.verts
Adj := G₁.Adj ⊔ G₂.Adj
adj_sub := fun hab => Or.elim hab (fun h => G₁.adj_sub h) fun h => G₂.adj_sub h
edge_vert := Or.imp (fun h => G₁.edge_vert h) fun h => G₂.edge_vert h
symm := fun _ _ => Or.imp G₁.adj_symm G₂.adj_symm }
/-- The intersection of two subgraphs. -/
instance : Min G.Subgraph where
min G₁ G₂ :=
{ verts := G₁.verts ∩ G₂.verts
Adj := G₁.Adj ⊓ G₂.Adj
adj_sub := fun hab => G₁.adj_sub hab.1
edge_vert := And.imp (fun h => G₁.edge_vert h) fun h => G₂.edge_vert h
symm := fun _ _ => And.imp G₁.adj_symm G₂.adj_symm }
/-- The `top` subgraph is `G` as a subgraph of itself. -/
instance : Top G.Subgraph where
top :=
{ verts := Set.univ
Adj := G.Adj
adj_sub := id
edge_vert := @fun v _ _ => Set.mem_univ v
symm := G.symm }
/-- The `bot` subgraph is the subgraph with no vertices or edges. -/
instance : Bot G.Subgraph where
bot :=
{ verts := ∅
Adj := ⊥
adj_sub := False.elim
edge_vert := False.elim
symm := fun _ _ => id }
instance : SupSet G.Subgraph where
sSup s :=
{ verts := ⋃ G' ∈ s, verts G'
Adj := fun a b => ∃ G' ∈ s, Adj G' a b
adj_sub := by
rintro a b ⟨G', -, hab⟩
exact G'.adj_sub hab
edge_vert := by
rintro a b ⟨G', hG', hab⟩
exact Set.mem_iUnion₂_of_mem hG' (G'.edge_vert hab)
symm := fun a b h => by simpa [adj_comm] using h }
instance : InfSet G.Subgraph where
sInf s :=
{ verts := ⋂ G' ∈ s, verts G'
Adj := fun a b => (∀ ⦃G'⦄, G' ∈ s → Adj G' a b) ∧ G.Adj a b
adj_sub := And.right
edge_vert := fun hab => Set.mem_iInter₂_of_mem fun G' hG' => G'.edge_vert <| hab.1 hG'
symm := fun _ _ => And.imp (forall₂_imp fun _ _ => Adj.symm) G.adj_symm }
@[simp]
theorem sup_adj : (G₁ ⊔ G₂).Adj a b ↔ G₁.Adj a b ∨ G₂.Adj a b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem inf_adj : (G₁ ⊓ G₂).Adj a b ↔ G₁.Adj a b ∧ G₂.Adj a b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_adj : (⊤ : Subgraph G).Adj a b ↔ G.Adj a b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_bot_adj : ¬ (⊥ : Subgraph G).Adj a b :=
not_false
@[simp]
theorem verts_sup (G₁ G₂ : G.Subgraph) : (G₁ ⊔ G₂).verts = G₁.verts ∪ G₂.verts :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem verts_inf (G₁ G₂ : G.Subgraph) : (G₁ ⊓ G₂).verts = G₁.verts ∩ G₂.verts :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem verts_top : (⊤ : G.Subgraph).verts = Set.univ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem verts_bot : (⊥ : G.Subgraph).verts = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sSup_adj {s : Set G.Subgraph} : (sSup s).Adj a b ↔ ∃ G ∈ s, Adj G a b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem sInf_adj {s : Set G.Subgraph} : (sInf s).Adj a b ↔ (∀ G' ∈ s, Adj G' a b) ∧ G.Adj a b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem iSup_adj {f : ι → G.Subgraph} : (⨆ i, f i).Adj a b ↔ ∃ i, (f i).Adj a b := by
simp [iSup]
@[simp]
theorem iInf_adj {f : ι → G.Subgraph} : (⨅ i, f i).Adj a b ↔ (∀ i, (f i).Adj a b) ∧ G.Adj a b := by
simp [iInf]
theorem sInf_adj_of_nonempty {s : Set G.Subgraph} (hs : s.Nonempty) :
(sInf s).Adj a b ↔ ∀ G' ∈ s, Adj G' a b :=
sInf_adj.trans <|
and_iff_left_of_imp <| by
obtain ⟨G', hG'⟩ := hs
exact fun h => G'.adj_sub (h _ hG')
theorem iInf_adj_of_nonempty [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → G.Subgraph} :
(⨅ i, f i).Adj a b ↔ ∀ i, (f i).Adj a b := by
rw [iInf, sInf_adj_of_nonempty (Set.range_nonempty _)]
simp
@[simp]
theorem verts_sSup (s : Set G.Subgraph) : (sSup s).verts = ⋃ G' ∈ s, verts G' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem verts_sInf (s : Set G.Subgraph) : (sInf s).verts = ⋂ G' ∈ s, verts G' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem verts_iSup {f : ι → G.Subgraph} : (⨆ i, f i).verts = ⋃ i, (f i).verts := by simp [iSup]
@[simp]
theorem verts_iInf {f : ι → G.Subgraph} : (⨅ i, f i).verts = ⋂ i, (f i).verts := by simp [iInf]
@[simp] lemma coe_bot : (⊥ : G.Subgraph).coe = ⊥ := rfl
@[simp] lemma IsInduced.top : (⊤ : G.Subgraph).IsInduced := fun _ _ _ _ ↦ id
/-- The graph isomorphism between the top element of `G.subgraph` and `G`. -/
def topIso : (⊤ : G.Subgraph).coe ≃g G where
toFun := (↑)
invFun a := ⟨a, Set.mem_univ _⟩
left_inv _ := Subtype.eta ..
right_inv _ := rfl
map_rel_iff' := .rfl
theorem verts_spanningCoe_injective :
(fun G' : Subgraph G => (G'.verts, G'.spanningCoe)).Injective := by
intro G₁ G₂ h
rw [Prod.ext_iff] at h
exact Subgraph.ext h.1 (spanningCoe_inj.1 h.2)
/-- For subgraphs `G₁`, `G₂`, `G₁ ≤ G₂` iff `G₁.verts ⊆ G₂.verts` and
`∀ a b, G₁.adj a b → G₂.adj a b`. -/
instance distribLattice : DistribLattice G.Subgraph :=
{ show DistribLattice G.Subgraph from
verts_spanningCoe_injective.distribLattice _
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl with
le := fun x y => x.verts ⊆ y.verts ∧ ∀ ⦃v w : V⦄, x.Adj v w → y.Adj v w }
instance : BoundedOrder (Subgraph G) where
top := ⊤
bot := ⊥
le_top x := ⟨Set.subset_univ _, fun _ _ => x.adj_sub⟩
bot_le _ := ⟨Set.empty_subset _, fun _ _ => False.elim⟩
/-- Note that subgraphs do not form a Boolean algebra, because of `verts`. -/
def completelyDistribLatticeMinimalAxioms : CompletelyDistribLattice.MinimalAxioms G.Subgraph :=
{ Subgraph.distribLattice with
le := (· ≤ ·)
sup := (· ⊔ ·)
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
top := ⊤
bot := ⊥
le_top := fun G' => ⟨Set.subset_univ _, fun _ _ => G'.adj_sub⟩
bot_le := fun _ => ⟨Set.empty_subset _, fun _ _ => False.elim⟩
sSup := sSup
-- Porting note: needed `apply` here to modify elaboration; previously the term itself was fine.
le_sSup := fun s G' hG' => ⟨by apply Set.subset_iUnion₂ G' hG', fun _ _ hab => ⟨G', hG', hab⟩⟩
sSup_le := fun s G' hG' =>
⟨Set.iUnion₂_subset fun _ hH => (hG' _ hH).1, by
rintro a b ⟨H, hH, hab⟩
exact (hG' _ hH).2 hab⟩
sInf := sInf
sInf_le := fun _ G' hG' => ⟨Set.iInter₂_subset G' hG', fun _ _ hab => hab.1 hG'⟩
le_sInf := fun _ G' hG' =>
⟨Set.subset_iInter₂ fun _ hH => (hG' _ hH).1, fun _ _ hab =>
⟨fun _ hH => (hG' _ hH).2 hab, G'.adj_sub hab⟩⟩
iInf_iSup_eq := fun f => Subgraph.ext (by simpa using iInf_iSup_eq)
(by ext; simp [Classical.skolem]) }
instance : CompletelyDistribLattice G.Subgraph :=
.ofMinimalAxioms completelyDistribLatticeMinimalAxioms
@[gcongr] lemma verts_mono {H H' : G.Subgraph} (h : H ≤ H') : H.verts ⊆ H'.verts := h.1
lemma verts_monotone : Monotone (verts : G.Subgraph → Set V) := fun _ _ h ↦ h.1
@[simps]
instance subgraphInhabited : Inhabited (Subgraph G) := ⟨⊥⟩
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_sup {H H' : G.Subgraph} (v : V) :
(H ⊔ H').neighborSet v = H.neighborSet v ∪ H'.neighborSet v := rfl
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_inf {H H' : G.Subgraph} (v : V) :
(H ⊓ H').neighborSet v = H.neighborSet v ∩ H'.neighborSet v := rfl
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_top (v : V) : (⊤ : G.Subgraph).neighborSet v = G.neighborSet v := rfl
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_bot (v : V) : (⊥ : G.Subgraph).neighborSet v = ∅ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_sSup (s : Set G.Subgraph) (v : V) :
(sSup s).neighborSet v = ⋃ G' ∈ s, neighborSet G' v := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_sInf (s : Set G.Subgraph) (v : V) :
(sInf s).neighborSet v = (⋂ G' ∈ s, neighborSet G' v) ∩ G.neighborSet v := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_iSup (f : ι → G.Subgraph) (v : V) :
(⨆ i, f i).neighborSet v = ⋃ i, (f i).neighborSet v := by simp [iSup]
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_iInf (f : ι → G.Subgraph) (v : V) :
(⨅ i, f i).neighborSet v = (⋂ i, (f i).neighborSet v) ∩ G.neighborSet v := by simp [iInf]
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_top : (⊤ : Subgraph G).edgeSet = G.edgeSet := rfl
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_bot : (⊥ : Subgraph G).edgeSet = ∅ :=
Set.ext <| Sym2.ind (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_inf {H₁ H₂ : Subgraph G} : (H₁ ⊓ H₂).edgeSet = H₁.edgeSet ∩ H₂.edgeSet :=
Set.ext <| Sym2.ind (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_sup {H₁ H₂ : Subgraph G} : (H₁ ⊔ H₂).edgeSet = H₁.edgeSet ∪ H₂.edgeSet :=
Set.ext <| Sym2.ind (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_sSup (s : Set G.Subgraph) : (sSup s).edgeSet = ⋃ G' ∈ s, edgeSet G' := by
ext e
induction e
simp
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_sInf (s : Set G.Subgraph) :
(sInf s).edgeSet = (⋂ G' ∈ s, edgeSet G') ∩ G.edgeSet := by
ext e
induction e
simp
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_iSup (f : ι → G.Subgraph) :
(⨆ i, f i).edgeSet = ⋃ i, (f i).edgeSet := by simp [iSup]
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_iInf (f : ι → G.Subgraph) :
(⨅ i, f i).edgeSet = (⋂ i, (f i).edgeSet) ∩ G.edgeSet := by
simp [iInf]
@[simp]
theorem spanningCoe_top : (⊤ : Subgraph G).spanningCoe = G := rfl
@[simp]
theorem spanningCoe_bot : (⊥ : Subgraph G).spanningCoe = ⊥ := rfl
/-- Turn a subgraph of a `SimpleGraph` into a member of its subgraph type. -/
@[simps]
def _root_.SimpleGraph.toSubgraph (H : SimpleGraph V) (h : H ≤ G) : G.Subgraph where
verts := Set.univ
Adj := H.Adj
adj_sub e := h e
edge_vert _ := Set.mem_univ _
symm := H.symm
theorem support_mono {H H' : Subgraph G} (h : H ≤ H') : H.support ⊆ H'.support :=
Rel.dom_mono h.2
theorem _root_.SimpleGraph.toSubgraph.isSpanning (H : SimpleGraph V) (h : H ≤ G) :
(toSubgraph H h).IsSpanning :=
Set.mem_univ
theorem spanningCoe_le_of_le {H H' : Subgraph G} (h : H ≤ H') : H.spanningCoe ≤ H'.spanningCoe :=
h.2
@[simp]
lemma sup_spanningCoe (H H' : Subgraph G) :
(H ⊔ H').spanningCoe = H.spanningCoe ⊔ H'.spanningCoe := rfl
/-- The top of the `Subgraph G` lattice is equivalent to the graph itself. -/
def topEquiv : (⊤ : Subgraph G).coe ≃g G where
toFun v := ↑v
invFun v := ⟨v, trivial⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl
/-- The bottom of the `Subgraph G` lattice is equivalent to the empty graph on the empty
vertex type. -/
def botEquiv : (⊥ : Subgraph G).coe ≃g (⊥ : SimpleGraph Empty) where
toFun v := v.property.elim
invFun v := v.elim
left_inv := fun ⟨_, h⟩ ↦ h.elim
right_inv v := v.elim
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl
theorem edgeSet_mono {H₁ H₂ : Subgraph G} (h : H₁ ≤ H₂) : H₁.edgeSet ≤ H₂.edgeSet :=
Sym2.ind h.2
theorem _root_.Disjoint.edgeSet {H₁ H₂ : Subgraph G} (h : Disjoint H₁ H₂) :
Disjoint H₁.edgeSet H₂.edgeSet :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr <| by simpa using edgeSet_mono h.le_bot
section map
variable {G' : SimpleGraph W} {f : G →g G'}
/-- Graph homomorphisms induce a covariant function on subgraphs. -/
@[simps]
protected def map (f : G →g G') (H : G.Subgraph) : G'.Subgraph where
verts := f '' H.verts
Adj := Relation.Map H.Adj f f
adj_sub := by
rintro _ _ ⟨u, v, h, rfl, rfl⟩
exact f.map_rel (H.adj_sub h)
edge_vert := by
rintro _ _ ⟨u, v, h, rfl, rfl⟩
exact Set.mem_image_of_mem _ (H.edge_vert h)
symm := by
rintro _ _ ⟨u, v, h, rfl, rfl⟩
exact ⟨v, u, H.symm h, rfl, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma map_id (H : G.Subgraph) : H.map Hom.id = H := by ext <;> simp
lemma map_comp {U : Type*} {G'' : SimpleGraph U} (H : G.Subgraph) (f : G →g G') (g : G' →g G'') :
H.map (g.comp f) = (H.map f).map g := by ext <;> simp [Subgraph.map]
@[gcongr] lemma map_mono {H₁ H₂ : G.Subgraph} (hH : H₁ ≤ H₂) : H₁.map f ≤ H₂.map f := by
constructor
· intro
simp only [map_verts, Set.mem_image, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
rintro v hv rfl
exact ⟨_, hH.1 hv, rfl⟩
· rintro _ _ ⟨u, v, ha, rfl, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, _, hH.2 ha, rfl, rfl⟩
lemma map_monotone : Monotone (Subgraph.map f) := fun _ _ ↦ map_mono
theorem map_sup (f : G →g G') (H₁ H₂ : G.Subgraph) : (H₁ ⊔ H₂).map f = H₁.map f ⊔ H₂.map f := by
ext <;> simp [Set.image_union, map_adj, sup_adj, Relation.Map, or_and_right, exists_or]
@[simp] lemma map_iso_top {H : SimpleGraph W} (e : G ≃g H) : Subgraph.map e.toHom ⊤ = ⊤ := by
ext <;> simp [Relation.Map, e.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply, ← e.map_rel_iff]
@[simp] lemma edgeSet_map (f : G →g G') (H : G.Subgraph) :
(H.map f).edgeSet = Sym2.map f '' H.edgeSet := Sym2.fromRel_relationMap ..
end map
/-- Graph homomorphisms induce a contravariant function on subgraphs. -/
@[simps]
protected def comap {G' : SimpleGraph W} (f : G →g G') (H : G'.Subgraph) : G.Subgraph where
verts := f ⁻¹' H.verts
Adj u v := G.Adj u v ∧ H.Adj (f u) (f v)
adj_sub h := h.1
edge_vert h := Set.mem_preimage.1 (H.edge_vert h.2)
symm _ _ h := ⟨G.symm h.1, H.symm h.2⟩
theorem comap_monotone {G' : SimpleGraph W} (f : G →g G') : Monotone (Subgraph.comap f) := by
intro H H' h
constructor
· intro
simp only [comap_verts, Set.mem_preimage]
apply h.1
· intro v w
simp +contextual only [comap_adj, and_imp, true_and]
intro
apply h.2
@[simp] lemma comap_equiv_top {H : SimpleGraph W} (f : G →g H) : Subgraph.comap f ⊤ = ⊤ := by
ext <;> simp +contextual [f.map_adj]
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap {G' : SimpleGraph W} (f : G →g G') (H : G.Subgraph) (H' : G'.Subgraph) :
H.map f ≤ H' ↔ H ≤ H'.comap f := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨fun v hv ↦ ?_, fun v w hvw ↦ ?_⟩, fun h ↦ ⟨fun v ↦ ?_, fun v w ↦ ?_⟩⟩
· simp only [comap_verts, Set.mem_preimage]
exact h.1 ⟨v, hv, rfl⟩
· simp only [H.adj_sub hvw, comap_adj, true_and]
exact h.2 ⟨v, w, hvw, rfl, rfl⟩
· simp only [map_verts, Set.mem_image, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
rintro w hw rfl
exact h.1 hw
· simp only [Relation.Map, map_adj, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
rintro u u' hu rfl rfl
exact (h.2 hu).2
instance [DecidableEq V] [Fintype V] [DecidableRel G.Adj] : Fintype G.Subgraph := by
refine .ofBijective
(α := {H : Finset V × (V → V → Bool) //
(∀ a b, H.2 a b → G.Adj a b) ∧ (∀ a b, H.2 a b → a ∈ H.1) ∧ ∀ a b, H.2 a b = H.2 b a})
(fun H ↦ ⟨H.1.1, fun a b ↦ H.1.2 a b, @H.2.1, @H.2.2.1, by simp [Symmetric, H.2.2.2]⟩)
⟨?_, fun H ↦ ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨_, _⟩, -⟩ ⟨⟨_, _⟩, -⟩
simp [funext_iff]
· classical
exact ⟨⟨(H.verts.toFinset, fun a b ↦ H.Adj a b), fun a b ↦ by simpa using H.adj_sub,
fun a b ↦ by simpa using H.edge_vert, by simp [H.adj_comm]⟩, by simp⟩
instance [Finite V] : Finite G.Subgraph := by classical cases nonempty_fintype V; infer_instance
/-- Given two subgraphs, one a subgraph of the other, there is an induced injective homomorphism of
the subgraphs as graphs. -/
@[simps]
def inclusion {x y : Subgraph G} (h : x ≤ y) : x.coe →g y.coe where
toFun v := ⟨↑v, And.left h v.property⟩
map_rel' hvw := h.2 hvw
theorem inclusion.injective {x y : Subgraph G} (h : x ≤ y) : Function.Injective (inclusion h) := by
intro v w h
rw [inclusion, DFunLike.coe, Subtype.mk_eq_mk] at h
exact Subtype.ext h
/-- There is an induced injective homomorphism of a subgraph of `G` into `G`. -/
@[simps]
protected def hom (x : Subgraph G) : x.coe →g G where
toFun v := v
map_rel' := x.adj_sub
@[simp] lemma coe_hom (x : Subgraph G) :
(x.hom : x.verts → V) = (fun (v : x.verts) => (v : V)) := rfl
theorem hom_injective {x : Subgraph G} : Function.Injective x.hom :=
fun _ _ ↦ Subtype.ext
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-15")] alias hom.injective := hom_injective
@[simp] lemma map_hom_top (G' : G.Subgraph) : Subgraph.map G'.hom ⊤ = G' := by
aesop (add unfold safe Relation.Map, unsafe G'.edge_vert, unsafe Adj.symm)
/-- There is an induced injective homomorphism of a subgraph of `G` as
a spanning subgraph into `G`. -/
@[simps]
def spanningHom (x : Subgraph G) : x.spanningCoe →g G where
toFun := id
map_rel' := x.adj_sub
theorem spanningHom_injective {x : Subgraph G} : Function.Injective x.spanningHom :=
fun _ _ ↦ id
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-15")] alias spanningHom.injective := spanningHom_injective
theorem neighborSet_subset_of_subgraph {x y : Subgraph G} (h : x ≤ y) (v : V) :
x.neighborSet v ⊆ y.neighborSet v :=
fun _ h' ↦ h.2 h'
instance neighborSet.decidablePred (G' : Subgraph G) [h : DecidableRel G'.Adj] (v : V) :
DecidablePred (· ∈ G'.neighborSet v) :=
h v
/-- If a graph is locally finite at a vertex, then so is a subgraph of that graph. -/
instance finiteAt {G' : Subgraph G} (v : G'.verts) [DecidableRel G'.Adj]
[Fintype (G.neighborSet v)] : Fintype (G'.neighborSet v) :=
Set.fintypeSubset (G.neighborSet v) (G'.neighborSet_subset v)
/-- If a subgraph is locally finite at a vertex, then so are subgraphs of that subgraph.
This is not an instance because `G''` cannot be inferred. -/
def finiteAtOfSubgraph {G' G'' : Subgraph G} [DecidableRel G'.Adj] (h : G' ≤ G'') (v : G'.verts)
[Fintype (G''.neighborSet v)] : Fintype (G'.neighborSet v) :=
Set.fintypeSubset (G''.neighborSet v) (neighborSet_subset_of_subgraph h v)
instance (G' : Subgraph G) [Fintype G'.verts] (v : V) [DecidablePred (· ∈ G'.neighborSet v)] :
Fintype (G'.neighborSet v) :=
Set.fintypeSubset G'.verts (neighborSet_subset_verts G' v)
instance coeFiniteAt {G' : Subgraph G} (v : G'.verts) [Fintype (G'.neighborSet v)] :
Fintype (G'.coe.neighborSet v) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv _ (coeNeighborSetEquiv v).symm
theorem IsSpanning.card_verts [Fintype V] {G' : Subgraph G} [Fintype G'.verts] (h : G'.IsSpanning) :
G'.verts.toFinset.card = Fintype.card V := by
simp only [isSpanning_iff.1 h, Set.toFinset_univ]
congr
/-- The degree of a vertex in a subgraph. It's zero for vertices outside the subgraph. -/
def degree (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) [Fintype (G'.neighborSet v)] : ℕ :=
Fintype.card (G'.neighborSet v)
theorem finset_card_neighborSet_eq_degree {G' : Subgraph G} {v : V} [Fintype (G'.neighborSet v)] :
(G'.neighborSet v).toFinset.card = G'.degree v := by
rw [degree, Set.toFinset_card]
theorem degree_le (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) [Fintype (G'.neighborSet v)]
[Fintype (G.neighborSet v)] : G'.degree v ≤ G.degree v := by
rw [← card_neighborSet_eq_degree]
exact Set.card_le_card (G'.neighborSet_subset v)
theorem degree_le' (G' G'' : Subgraph G) (h : G' ≤ G'') (v : V) [Fintype (G'.neighborSet v)]
[Fintype (G''.neighborSet v)] : G'.degree v ≤ G''.degree v :=
Set.card_le_card (neighborSet_subset_of_subgraph h v)
@[simp]
theorem coe_degree (G' : Subgraph G) (v : G'.verts) [Fintype (G'.coe.neighborSet v)]
[Fintype (G'.neighborSet v)] : G'.coe.degree v = G'.degree v := by
rw [← card_neighborSet_eq_degree]
exact Fintype.card_congr (coeNeighborSetEquiv v)
@[simp]
theorem degree_spanningCoe {G' : G.Subgraph} (v : V) [Fintype (G'.neighborSet v)]
[Fintype (G'.spanningCoe.neighborSet v)] : G'.spanningCoe.degree v = G'.degree v := by
rw [← card_neighborSet_eq_degree, Subgraph.degree]
congr!
theorem degree_eq_one_iff_unique_adj {G' : Subgraph G} {v : V} [Fintype (G'.neighborSet v)] :
G'.degree v = 1 ↔ ∃! w : V, G'.Adj v w := by
rw [← finset_card_neighborSet_eq_degree, Finset.card_eq_one, Finset.singleton_iff_unique_mem]
simp only [Set.mem_toFinset, mem_neighborSet]
lemma neighborSet_eq_of_equiv {v : V} {H : Subgraph G}
(h : G.neighborSet v ≃ H.neighborSet v) (hfin : (G.neighborSet v).Finite) :
H.neighborSet v = G.neighborSet v := by
lift H.neighborSet v to Finset V using h.set_finite_iff.mp hfin with s hs
lift G.neighborSet v to Finset V using hfin with t ht
refine congrArg _ <| Finset.eq_of_subset_of_card_le ?_ (Finset.card_eq_of_equiv h).le
rw [← Finset.coe_subset, hs, ht]
exact H.neighborSet_subset _
|
lemma adj_iff_of_neighborSet_equiv {v : V} {H : Subgraph G}
(h : G.neighborSet v ≃ H.neighborSet v) (hfin : (G.neighborSet v).Finite) :
∀ {w}, H.Adj v w ↔ G.Adj v w :=
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Subgraph.lean | 819 | 822 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Michael Stoll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Stoll, Ralf Stephan
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Squarefree
/-!
# Smooth numbers
For `s : Finset ℕ` we define the set `Nat.factoredNumbers s` of "`s`-factored numbers"
consisting of the positive natural numbers all of whose prime factors are in `s`, and
we provide some API for this.
We then define the set `Nat.smoothNumbers n` consisting of the positive natural numbers all of
whose prime factors are strictly less than `n`. This is the special case `s = Finset.range n`
of the set of `s`-factored numbers.
We also define the finite set `Nat.primesBelow n` to be the set of prime numbers less than `n`.
The main definition `Nat.equivProdNatSmoothNumbers` establishes the bijection between
`ℕ × (smoothNumbers p)` and `smoothNumbers (p+1)` given by sending `(e, n)` to `p^e * n`.
Here `p` is a prime number. It is obtained from the more general bijection between
`ℕ × (factoredNumbers s)` and `factoredNumbers (s ∪ {p})`; see `Nat.equivProdNatFactoredNumbers`.
Additionally, we define `Nat.smoothNumbersUpTo N n` as the `Finset` of `n`-smooth numbers
up to and including `N`, and similarly `Nat.roughNumbersUpTo` for its complement in `{1, ..., N}`,
and we provide some API, in particular bounds for their cardinalities; see
`Nat.smoothNumbersUpTo_card_le` and `Nat.roughNumbersUpTo_card_le`.
-/
open scoped Finset
namespace Nat
/-- `primesBelow n` is the set of primes less than `n` as a `Finset`. -/
def primesBelow (n : ℕ) : Finset ℕ := {p ∈ Finset.range n | p.Prime}
@[simp]
lemma primesBelow_zero : primesBelow 0 = ∅ := by
rw [primesBelow, Finset.range_zero, Finset.filter_empty]
lemma mem_primesBelow {k n : ℕ} :
n ∈ primesBelow k ↔ n < k ∧ n.Prime := by simp [primesBelow]
lemma prime_of_mem_primesBelow {p n : ℕ} (h : p ∈ n.primesBelow) : p.Prime :=
(Finset.mem_filter.mp h).2
lemma lt_of_mem_primesBelow {p n : ℕ} (h : p ∈ n.primesBelow) : p < n :=
Finset.mem_range.mp <| Finset.mem_of_mem_filter p h
lemma primesBelow_succ (n : ℕ) :
primesBelow (n + 1) = if n.Prime then insert n (primesBelow n) else primesBelow n := by
rw [primesBelow, primesBelow, Finset.range_succ, Finset.filter_insert]
lemma not_mem_primesBelow (n : ℕ) : n ∉ primesBelow n :=
fun hn ↦ (lt_of_mem_primesBelow hn).false
/-!
### `s`-factored numbers
-/
/-- `factoredNumbers s`, for a finite set `s` of natural numbers, is the set of positive natural
numbers all of whose prime factors are in `s`. -/
def factoredNumbers (s : Finset ℕ) : Set ℕ := {m | m ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ p ∈ primeFactorsList m, p ∈ s}
lemma mem_factoredNumbers {s : Finset ℕ} {m : ℕ} :
m ∈ factoredNumbers s ↔ m ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ p ∈ primeFactorsList m, p ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
/-- Membership in `Nat.factoredNumbers n` is decidable. -/
instance (s : Finset ℕ) : DecidablePred (· ∈ factoredNumbers s) :=
inferInstanceAs <| DecidablePred fun x ↦ x ∈ {m | m ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ p ∈ primeFactorsList m, p ∈ s}
/-- A number that divides an `s`-factored number is itself `s`-factored. -/
lemma mem_factoredNumbers_of_dvd {s : Finset ℕ} {m k : ℕ} (h : m ∈ factoredNumbers s)
(h' : k ∣ m) :
k ∈ factoredNumbers s := by
obtain ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := h
have hk := ne_zero_of_dvd_ne_zero h₁ h'
refine ⟨hk, fun p hp ↦ h₂ p ?_⟩
rw [mem_primeFactorsList <| by assumption] at hp ⊢
exact ⟨hp.1, hp.2.trans h'⟩
/-- `m` is `s`-factored if and only if `m` is nonzero and all prime divisors `≤ m` of `m`
are in `s`. -/
lemma mem_factoredNumbers_iff_forall_le {s : Finset ℕ} {m : ℕ} :
m ∈ factoredNumbers s ↔ m ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ p ≤ m, p.Prime → p ∣ m → p ∈ s := by
simp_rw [mem_factoredNumbers, mem_primeFactorsList']
exact ⟨fun ⟨H₀, H₁⟩ ↦ ⟨H₀, fun p _ hp₂ hp₃ ↦ H₁ p ⟨hp₂, hp₃, H₀⟩⟩,
fun ⟨H₀, H₁⟩ ↦
⟨H₀, fun p ⟨hp₁, hp₂, hp₃⟩ ↦ H₁ p (le_of_dvd (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hp₃) hp₂) hp₁ hp₂⟩⟩
/-- `m` is `s`-factored if and only if all prime divisors of `m` are in `s`. -/
lemma mem_factoredNumbers' {s : Finset ℕ} {m : ℕ} :
m ∈ factoredNumbers s ↔ ∀ p, p.Prime → p ∣ m → p ∈ s := by
obtain ⟨p, hp₁, hp₂⟩ := exists_infinite_primes (1 + Finset.sup s id)
rw [mem_factoredNumbers_iff_forall_le]
refine ⟨fun ⟨H₀, H₁⟩ ↦ fun p hp₁ hp₂ ↦ H₁ p (le_of_dvd (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero H₀) hp₂) hp₁ hp₂,
fun H ↦ ⟨fun h ↦ lt_irrefl p ?_, fun p _ ↦ H p⟩⟩
calc
p ≤ s.sup id := Finset.le_sup (f := @id ℕ) <| H p hp₂ <| h.symm ▸ dvd_zero p
_ < 1 + s.sup id := lt_one_add _
_ ≤ p := hp₁
lemma ne_zero_of_mem_factoredNumbers {s : Finset ℕ} {m : ℕ} (h : m ∈ factoredNumbers s) : m ≠ 0 :=
h.1
/-- The `Finset` of prime factors of an `s`-factored number is contained in `s`. -/
lemma primeFactors_subset_of_mem_factoredNumbers {s : Finset ℕ} {m : ℕ}
(hm : m ∈ factoredNumbers s) :
m.primeFactors ⊆ s := by
rw [mem_factoredNumbers] at hm
exact fun n hn ↦ hm.2 n (mem_primeFactors_iff_mem_primeFactorsList.mp hn)
/-- If `m ≠ 0` and the `Finset` of prime factors of `m` is contained in `s`, then `m`
is `s`-factored. -/
lemma mem_factoredNumbers_of_primeFactors_subset {s : Finset ℕ} {m : ℕ} (hm : m ≠ 0)
(hp : m.primeFactors ⊆ s) :
m ∈ factoredNumbers s := by
rw [mem_factoredNumbers]
exact ⟨hm, fun p hp' ↦ hp <| mem_primeFactors_iff_mem_primeFactorsList.mpr hp'⟩
/-- `m` is `s`-factored if and only if `m ≠ 0` and its `Finset` of prime factors
is contained in `s`. -/
lemma mem_factoredNumbers_iff_primeFactors_subset {s : Finset ℕ} {m : ℕ} :
m ∈ factoredNumbers s ↔ m ≠ 0 ∧ m.primeFactors ⊆ s :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨ne_zero_of_mem_factoredNumbers h, primeFactors_subset_of_mem_factoredNumbers h⟩,
fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ ↦ mem_factoredNumbers_of_primeFactors_subset h₁ h₂⟩
|
@[simp]
lemma factoredNumbers_empty : factoredNumbers ∅ = {1} := by
ext m
simp only [mem_factoredNumbers, Finset.not_mem_empty, ← List.eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem,
primeFactorsList_eq_nil, and_or_left, not_and_self_iff, ne_and_eq_iff_right zero_ne_one,
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/SmoothNumbers.lean | 131 | 136 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Sophie Morel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm.NormedSpace
import Mathlib.Logic.Embedding.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.CardEmbedding
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.Multilinear.Topology
/-!
# Operator norm on the space of continuous multilinear maps
When `f` is a continuous multilinear map in finitely many variables, we define its norm `‖f‖` as the
smallest number such that `‖f m‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖` for all `m`.
We show that it is indeed a norm, and prove its basic properties.
## Main results
Let `f` be a multilinear map in finitely many variables.
* `exists_bound_of_continuous` asserts that, if `f` is continuous, then there exists `C > 0`
with `‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖` for all `m`.
* `continuous_of_bound`, conversely, asserts that this bound implies continuity.
* `mkContinuous` constructs the associated continuous multilinear map.
Let `f` be a continuous multilinear map in finitely many variables.
* `‖f‖` is its norm, i.e., the smallest number such that `‖f m‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖` for
all `m`.
* `le_opNorm f m` asserts the fundamental inequality `‖f m‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖`.
* `norm_image_sub_le f m₁ m₂` gives a control of the difference `f m₁ - f m₂` in terms of
`‖f‖` and `‖m₁ - m₂‖`.
## Implementation notes
We mostly follow the API (and the proofs) of `OperatorNorm.lean`, with the additional complexity
that we should deal with multilinear maps in several variables.
From the mathematical point of view, all the results follow from the results on operator norm in
one variable, by applying them to one variable after the other through currying. However, this
is only well defined when there is an order on the variables (for instance on `Fin n`) although
the final result is independent of the order. While everything could be done following this
approach, it turns out that direct proofs are easier and more efficient.
-/
suppress_compilation
noncomputable section
open scoped NNReal Topology Uniformity
open Finset Metric Function Filter
/-!
### Type variables
We use the following type variables in this file:
* `𝕜` : a `NontriviallyNormedField`;
* `ι`, `ι'` : finite index types with decidable equality;
* `E`, `E₁` : families of normed vector spaces over `𝕜` indexed by `i : ι`;
* `E'` : a family of normed vector spaces over `𝕜` indexed by `i' : ι'`;
* `Ei` : a family of normed vector spaces over `𝕜` indexed by `i : Fin (Nat.succ n)`;
* `G`, `G'` : normed vector spaces over `𝕜`.
-/
universe u v v' wE wE₁ wE' wG wG'
section continuous_eval
variable {𝕜 ι : Type*} {E : ι → Type*} {F : Type*}
[NormedField 𝕜] [Finite ι] [∀ i, SeminormedAddCommGroup (E i)] [∀ i, NormedSpace 𝕜 (E i)]
[TopologicalSpace F] [AddCommGroup F] [IsTopologicalAddGroup F] [Module 𝕜 F]
instance ContinuousMultilinearMap.instContinuousEval :
ContinuousEval (ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F) (Π i, E i) F where
continuous_eval := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
let _ := IsTopologicalAddGroup.toUniformSpace F
have := isUniformAddGroup_of_addCommGroup (G := F)
refine (UniformOnFun.continuousOn_eval₂ fun m ↦ ?_).comp_continuous
(isEmbedding_toUniformOnFun.continuous.prodMap continuous_id) fun (f, x) ↦ f.cont.continuousAt
exact ⟨ball m 1, NormedSpace.isVonNBounded_of_isBounded _ isBounded_ball,
ball_mem_nhds _ one_pos⟩
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
variable {G : Type*} [AddCommGroup G] [TopologicalSpace G] [Module 𝕜 G] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 F]
lemma continuous_uncurry_of_multilinear (f : G →L[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F) :
Continuous (fun (p : G × (Π i, E i)) ↦ f p.1 p.2) := by
fun_prop
lemma continuousOn_uncurry_of_multilinear (f : G →L[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F) {s} :
ContinuousOn (fun (p : G × (Π i, E i)) ↦ f p.1 p.2) s :=
f.continuous_uncurry_of_multilinear.continuousOn
lemma continuousAt_uncurry_of_multilinear (f : G →L[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F) {x} :
ContinuousAt (fun (p : G × (Π i, E i)) ↦ f p.1 p.2) x :=
| f.continuous_uncurry_of_multilinear.continuousAt
lemma continuousWithinAt_uncurry_of_multilinear (f : G →L[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F) {s x} :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun (p : G × (Π i, E i)) ↦ f p.1 p.2) s x :=
f.continuous_uncurry_of_multilinear.continuousWithinAt
end ContinuousLinearMap
end continuous_eval
section Seminorm
variable {𝕜 : Type u} {ι : Type v} {ι' : Type v'} {E : ι → Type wE} {E₁ : ι → Type wE₁}
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/Multilinear/Basic.lean | 99 | 111 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yakov Pechersky. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Cycle
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Cycle.Type
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.List
/-!
# Properties of cyclic permutations constructed from lists/cycles
In the following, `{α : Type*} [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α]`.
## Main definitions
* `Cycle.formPerm`: the cyclic permutation created by looping over a `Cycle α`
* `Equiv.Perm.toList`: the list formed by iterating application of a permutation
* `Equiv.Perm.toCycle`: the cycle formed by iterating application of a permutation
* `Equiv.Perm.isoCycle`: the equivalence between cyclic permutations `f : Perm α`
and the terms of `Cycle α` that correspond to them
* `Equiv.Perm.isoCycle'`: the same equivalence as `Equiv.Perm.isoCycle`
but with evaluation via choosing over fintypes
* The notation `c[1, 2, 3]` to emulate notation of cyclic permutations `(1 2 3)`
* A `Repr` instance for any `Perm α`, by representing the `Finset` of
`Cycle α` that correspond to the cycle factors.
## Main results
* `List.isCycle_formPerm`: a nontrivial list without duplicates, when interpreted as
a permutation, is cyclic
* `Equiv.Perm.IsCycle.existsUnique_cycle`: there is only one nontrivial `Cycle α`
corresponding to each cyclic `f : Perm α`
## Implementation details
The forward direction of `Equiv.Perm.isoCycle'` uses `Fintype.choose` of the uniqueness
result, relying on the `Fintype` instance of a `Cycle.Nodup` subtype.
It is unclear if this works faster than the `Equiv.Perm.toCycle`, which relies
on recursion over `Finset.univ`.
-/
open Equiv Equiv.Perm List
variable {α : Type*}
namespace List
variable [DecidableEq α] {l l' : List α}
theorem formPerm_disjoint_iff (hl : Nodup l) (hl' : Nodup l') (hn : 2 ≤ l.length)
(hn' : 2 ≤ l'.length) : Perm.Disjoint (formPerm l) (formPerm l') ↔ l.Disjoint l' := by
rw [disjoint_iff_eq_or_eq, List.Disjoint]
constructor
· rintro h x hx hx'
specialize h x
rw [formPerm_apply_mem_eq_self_iff _ hl _ hx, formPerm_apply_mem_eq_self_iff _ hl' _ hx'] at h
omega
· intro h x
by_cases hx : x ∈ l
on_goal 1 => by_cases hx' : x ∈ l'
· exact (h hx hx').elim
all_goals have := formPerm_eq_self_of_not_mem _ _ ‹_›; tauto
theorem isCycle_formPerm (hl : Nodup l) (hn : 2 ≤ l.length) : IsCycle (formPerm l) := by
rcases l with - | ⟨x, l⟩
· norm_num at hn
induction' l with y l generalizing x
· norm_num at hn
· use x
constructor
· rwa [formPerm_apply_mem_ne_self_iff _ hl _ mem_cons_self]
· intro w hw
have : w ∈ x::y::l := mem_of_formPerm_ne_self _ _ hw
obtain ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩ := getElem_of_mem this
use k
simp only [zpow_natCast, formPerm_pow_apply_head _ _ hl k, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hk]
theorem pairwise_sameCycle_formPerm (hl : Nodup l) (hn : 2 ≤ l.length) :
Pairwise l.formPerm.SameCycle l :=
Pairwise.imp_mem.mpr
(pairwise_of_forall fun _ _ hx hy =>
(isCycle_formPerm hl hn).sameCycle ((formPerm_apply_mem_ne_self_iff _ hl _ hx).mpr hn)
((formPerm_apply_mem_ne_self_iff _ hl _ hy).mpr hn))
theorem cycleOf_formPerm (hl : Nodup l) (hn : 2 ≤ l.length) (x) :
cycleOf l.attach.formPerm x = l.attach.formPerm :=
have hn : 2 ≤ l.attach.length := by rwa [← length_attach] at hn
have hl : l.attach.Nodup := by rwa [← nodup_attach] at hl
(isCycle_formPerm hl hn).cycleOf_eq
((formPerm_apply_mem_ne_self_iff _ hl _ (mem_attach _ _)).mpr hn)
theorem cycleType_formPerm (hl : Nodup l) (hn : 2 ≤ l.length) :
cycleType l.attach.formPerm = {l.length} := by
rw [← length_attach] at hn
rw [← nodup_attach] at hl
rw [cycleType_eq [l.attach.formPerm]]
· simp only [map, Function.comp_apply]
rw [support_formPerm_of_nodup _ hl, card_toFinset, dedup_eq_self.mpr hl]
· simp
· intro x h
simp [h, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff] at hn
· simp
· simpa using isCycle_formPerm hl hn
· simp
theorem formPerm_apply_mem_eq_next (hl : Nodup l) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ l) :
formPerm l x = next l x hx := by
obtain ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩ := getElem_of_mem hx
rw [next_getElem _ hl, formPerm_apply_getElem _ hl]
end List
namespace Cycle
variable [DecidableEq α] (s : Cycle α)
/-- A cycle `s : Cycle α`, given `Nodup s` can be interpreted as an `Equiv.Perm α`
where each element in the list is permuted to the next one, defined as `formPerm`.
-/
def formPerm : ∀ s : Cycle α, Nodup s → Equiv.Perm α :=
fun s => Quotient.hrecOn s (fun l _ => List.formPerm l) fun l₁ l₂ (h : l₁ ~r l₂) => by
apply Function.hfunext
· ext
exact h.nodup_iff
· intro h₁ h₂ _
exact heq_of_eq (formPerm_eq_of_isRotated h₁ h)
@[simp]
theorem formPerm_coe (l : List α) (hl : l.Nodup) : formPerm (l : Cycle α) hl = l.formPerm :=
rfl
theorem formPerm_subsingleton (s : Cycle α) (h : Subsingleton s) : formPerm s h.nodup = 1 := by
induction' s using Quot.inductionOn with s
simp only [formPerm_coe, mk_eq_coe]
simp only [length_subsingleton_iff, length_coe, mk_eq_coe] at h
obtain - | ⟨hd, tl⟩ := s
· simp
· simp only [length_eq_zero_iff, add_le_iff_nonpos_left, List.length, nonpos_iff_eq_zero] at h
simp [h]
theorem isCycle_formPerm (s : Cycle α) (h : Nodup s) (hn : Nontrivial s) :
IsCycle (formPerm s h) := by
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
exact List.isCycle_formPerm h (length_nontrivial hn)
theorem support_formPerm [Fintype α] (s : Cycle α) (h : Nodup s) (hn : Nontrivial s) :
support (formPerm s h) = s.toFinset := by
induction' s using Quot.inductionOn with s
refine support_formPerm_of_nodup s h ?_
rintro _ rfl
simpa [Nat.succ_le_succ_iff] using length_nontrivial hn
theorem formPerm_eq_self_of_not_mem (s : Cycle α) (h : Nodup s) (x : α) (hx : x ∉ s) :
formPerm s h x = x := by
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
simpa using List.formPerm_eq_self_of_not_mem _ _ hx
theorem formPerm_apply_mem_eq_next (s : Cycle α) (h : Nodup s) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ s) :
formPerm s h x = next s h x hx := by
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
simpa using List.formPerm_apply_mem_eq_next h _ (by simp_all)
nonrec theorem formPerm_reverse (s : Cycle α) (h : Nodup s) :
formPerm s.reverse (nodup_reverse_iff.mpr h) = (formPerm s h)⁻¹ := by
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
simpa using formPerm_reverse _
nonrec theorem formPerm_eq_formPerm_iff {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] {s s' : Cycle α} {hs : s.Nodup}
{hs' : s'.Nodup} :
s.formPerm hs = s'.formPerm hs' ↔ s = s' ∨ s.Subsingleton ∧ s'.Subsingleton := by
rw [Cycle.length_subsingleton_iff, Cycle.length_subsingleton_iff]
revert s s'
intro s s'
apply @Quotient.inductionOn₂' _ _ _ _ _ s s'
intro l l' hl hl'
simpa using formPerm_eq_formPerm_iff hl hl'
end Cycle
namespace Equiv.Perm
section Fintype
variable [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α] (p : Equiv.Perm α) (x : α)
/-- `Equiv.Perm.toList (f : Perm α) (x : α)` generates the list `[x, f x, f (f x), ...]`
until looping. That means when `f x = x`, `toList f x = []`.
-/
def toList : List α :=
List.iterate p x (cycleOf p x).support.card
@[simp]
theorem toList_one : toList (1 : Perm α) x = [] := by simp [toList, cycleOf_one]
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_nil_iff {p : Perm α} {x} : toList p x = [] ↔ x ∉ p.support := by simp [toList]
@[simp]
theorem length_toList : length (toList p x) = (cycleOf p x).support.card := by simp [toList]
theorem toList_ne_singleton (y : α) : toList p x ≠ [y] := by
intro H
simpa [card_support_ne_one] using congr_arg length H
theorem two_le_length_toList_iff_mem_support {p : Perm α} {x : α} :
2 ≤ length (toList p x) ↔ x ∈ p.support := by simp
theorem length_toList_pos_of_mem_support (h : x ∈ p.support) : 0 < length (toList p x) :=
zero_lt_two.trans_le (two_le_length_toList_iff_mem_support.mpr h)
theorem getElem_toList (n : ℕ) (hn : n < length (toList p x)) :
(toList p x)[n] = (p ^ n) x := by simp [toList]
@[deprecated getElem_toList (since := "2025-02-17")]
theorem get_toList (n : ℕ) (hn : n < length (toList p x)) :
(toList p x).get ⟨n, hn⟩ = (p ^ n) x := by simp [toList]
theorem toList_getElem_zero (h : x ∈ p.support) :
(toList p x)[0]'(length_toList_pos_of_mem_support _ _ h) = x := by simp [toList]
@[deprecated toList_getElem_zero (since := "2025-02-17")]
theorem toList_get_zero (h : x ∈ p.support) :
(toList p x).get ⟨0, (length_toList_pos_of_mem_support _ _ h)⟩ = x := by simp [toList]
variable {p} {x}
theorem mem_toList_iff {y : α} : y ∈ toList p x ↔ SameCycle p x y ∧ x ∈ p.support := by
simp only [toList, mem_iterate, iterate_eq_pow, eq_comm (a := y)]
constructor
· rintro ⟨n, hx, rfl⟩
refine ⟨⟨n, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
contrapose! hx
rw [← support_cycleOf_eq_nil_iff] at hx
simp [hx]
· rintro ⟨h, hx⟩
simpa using h.exists_pow_eq_of_mem_support hx
theorem nodup_toList (p : Perm α) (x : α) : Nodup (toList p x) := by
by_cases hx : p x = x
· rw [← not_mem_support, ← toList_eq_nil_iff] at hx
| simp [hx]
have hc : IsCycle (cycleOf p x) := isCycle_cycleOf p hx
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Cycle/Concrete.lean | 245 | 246 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Yakov Pechersky, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Basic
/-!
# Properties of `List.enum`
## Deprecation note
Many lemmas in this file have been replaced by theorems in Lean4,
in terms of `xs[i]?` and `xs[i]` rather than `get` and `get?`.
The deprecated results here are unused in Mathlib.
Any downstream users who can not easily adapt may remove the deprecations as needed.
-/
namespace List
variable {α : Type*}
theorem forall_mem_zipIdx {l : List α} {n : ℕ} {p : α × ℕ → Prop} :
(∀ x ∈ l.zipIdx n, p x) ↔ ∀ (i : ℕ) (_ : i < length l), p (l[i], n + i) := by
simp only [forall_mem_iff_getElem, getElem_zipIdx, length_zipIdx]
/-- Variant of `forall_mem_zipIdx` with the `zipIdx` argument specialized to `0`. -/
theorem forall_mem_zipIdx' {l : List α} {p : α × ℕ → Prop} :
(∀ x ∈ l.zipIdx, p x) ↔ ∀ (i : ℕ) (_ : i < length l), p (l[i], i) :=
forall_mem_zipIdx.trans <| by simp
theorem exists_mem_zipIdx {l : List α} {n : ℕ} {p : α × ℕ → Prop} :
(∃ x ∈ l.zipIdx n, p x) ↔ ∃ (i : ℕ) (_ : i < length l), p (l[i], n + i) := by
simp only [exists_mem_iff_getElem, getElem_zipIdx, length_zipIdx]
/-- Variant of `exists_mem_zipIdx` with the `zipIdx` argument specialized to `0`. -/
theorem exists_mem_zipIdx' {l : List α} {p : α × ℕ → Prop} :
(∃ x ∈ l.zipIdx, p x) ↔ ∃ (i : ℕ) (_ : i < length l), p (l[i], i) :=
exists_mem_zipIdx.trans <| by simp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-28")]
alias forall_mem_enumFrom := forall_mem_zipIdx
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-28")]
alias forall_mem_enum := forall_mem_zipIdx'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-28")]
alias exists_mem_enumFrom := exists_mem_zipIdx
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-28")]
alias exists_mem_enum := exists_mem_zipIdx'
end List
| Mathlib/Data/List/Enum.lean | 133 | 138 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta, Alena Gusakov, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GeomSum
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Slice
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.BitIndices
import Mathlib.Order.SupClosed
import Mathlib.Order.UpperLower.Closure
/-!
# Colexigraphic order
We define the colex order for finite sets, and give a couple of important lemmas and properties
relating to it.
The colex ordering likes to avoid large values: If the biggest element of `t` is bigger than all
elements of `s`, then `s < t`.
In the special case of `ℕ`, it can be thought of as the "binary" ordering. That is, order `s` based
on $∑_{i ∈ s} 2^i$. It's defined here on `Finset α` for any linear order `α`.
In the context of the Kruskal-Katona theorem, we are interested in how colex behaves for sets of a
fixed size. For example, for size 3, the colex order on ℕ starts
`012, 013, 023, 123, 014, 024, 124, 034, 134, 234, ...`
## Main statements
* Colex order properties - linearity, decidability and so on.
* `Finset.Colex.forall_lt_mono`: if `s < t` in colex, and everything in `t` is `< a`, then
everything in `s` is `< a`. This confirms the idea that an enumeration under colex will exhaust
all sets using elements `< a` before allowing `a` to be included.
* `Finset.toColex_image_le_toColex_image`: Strictly monotone functions preserve colex.
* `Finset.geomSum_le_geomSum_iff_toColex_le_toColex`: Colex for α = ℕ is the same as binary.
This also proves binary expansions are unique.
## See also
Related files are:
* `Data.List.Lex`: Lexicographic order on lists.
* `Data.Pi.Lex`: Lexicographic order on `Πₗ i, α i`.
* `Data.PSigma.Order`: Lexicographic order on `Σ' i, α i`.
* `Data.Sigma.Order`: Lexicographic order on `Σ i, α i`.
* `Data.Prod.Lex`: Lexicographic order on `α × β`.
## TODO
* Generalise `Colex.initSeg` so that it applies to `ℕ`.
## References
* https://github.com/b-mehta/maths-notes/blob/master/iii/mich/combinatorics.pdf
## Tags
colex, colexicographic, binary
-/
open Finset Function
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace Finset
/-- Type synonym of `Finset α` equipped with the colexicographic order rather than the inclusion
order. -/
@[ext]
structure Colex (α) where
/-- `toColex` is the "identity" function between `Finset α` and `Finset.Colex α`. -/
toColex ::
/-- `ofColex` is the "identity" function between `Finset.Colex α` and `Finset α`. -/
(ofColex : Finset α)
-- TODO: Why can't we export?
--export Colex (toColex)
open Colex
instance : Inhabited (Colex α) := ⟨⟨∅⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma toColex_ofColex (s : Colex α) : toColex (ofColex s) = s := rfl
lemma ofColex_toColex (s : Finset α) : ofColex (toColex s) = s := rfl
lemma toColex_inj {s t : Finset α} : toColex s = toColex t ↔ s = t := by simp
@[simp]
lemma ofColex_inj {s t : Colex α} : ofColex s = ofColex t ↔ s = t := by cases s; cases t; simp
lemma toColex_ne_toColex {s t : Finset α} : toColex s ≠ toColex t ↔ s ≠ t := by simp
lemma ofColex_ne_ofColex {s t : Colex α} : ofColex s ≠ ofColex t ↔ s ≠ t := by simp
lemma toColex_injective : Injective (toColex : Finset α → Colex α) := fun _ _ ↦ toColex_inj.1
lemma ofColex_injective : Injective (ofColex : Colex α → Finset α) := fun _ _ ↦ ofColex_inj.1
namespace Colex
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [PartialOrder β] {f : α → β} {𝒜 𝒜₁ 𝒜₂ : Finset (Finset α)}
{s t u : Finset α} {a b : α}
instance instLE : LE (Colex α) where
le s t := ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ ofColex s → a ∉ ofColex t → ∃ b, b ∈ ofColex t ∧ b ∉ ofColex s ∧ a ≤ b
-- TODO: This lemma is weirdly useful given how strange its statement is.
-- Is there a nicer statement? Should this lemma be made public?
private lemma trans_aux (hst : toColex s ≤ toColex t) (htu : toColex t ≤ toColex u)
(has : a ∈ s) (hat : a ∉ t) : ∃ b, b ∈ u ∧ b ∉ s ∧ a ≤ b := by
classical
let s' : Finset α := {b ∈ s | b ∉ t ∧ a ≤ b}
have ⟨b, hb, hbmax⟩ := exists_maximal s' ⟨a, by simp [s', has, hat]⟩
simp only [s', mem_filter, and_imp] at hb hbmax
have ⟨c, hct, hcs, hbc⟩ := hst hb.1 hb.2.1
by_cases hcu : c ∈ u
· exact ⟨c, hcu, hcs, hb.2.2.trans hbc⟩
have ⟨d, hdu, hdt, hcd⟩ := htu hct hcu
have had : a ≤ d := hb.2.2.trans <| hbc.trans hcd
refine ⟨d, hdu, fun hds ↦ ?_, had⟩
exact hbmax d hds hdt had <| hbc.trans_lt <| hcd.lt_of_ne <| ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hct hdt
private lemma antisymm_aux (hst : toColex s ≤ toColex t) (hts : toColex t ≤ toColex s) : s ⊆ t := by
intro a has
by_contra! hat
have ⟨_b, hb₁, hb₂, _⟩ := trans_aux hst hts has hat
exact hb₂ hb₁
instance instPartialOrder : PartialOrder (Colex α) where
le_refl _ _ ha ha' := (ha' ha).elim
le_antisymm _ _ hst hts := Colex.ext <| (antisymm_aux hst hts).antisymm (antisymm_aux hts hst)
le_trans s t u hst htu a has hau := by
by_cases hat : a ∈ ofColex t
· have ⟨b, hbu, hbt, hab⟩ := htu hat hau
by_cases hbs : b ∈ ofColex s
· have ⟨c, hcu, hcs, hbc⟩ := trans_aux hst htu hbs hbt
exact ⟨c, hcu, hcs, hab.trans hbc⟩
· exact ⟨b, hbu, hbs, hab⟩
· exact trans_aux hst htu has hat
lemma le_def {s t : Colex α} :
s ≤ t ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ ofColex s → a ∉ ofColex t → ∃ b, b ∈ ofColex t ∧ b ∉ ofColex s ∧ a ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
lemma toColex_le_toColex :
toColex s ≤ toColex t ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → a ∉ t → ∃ b, b ∈ t ∧ b ∉ s ∧ a ≤ b := Iff.rfl
lemma toColex_lt_toColex :
toColex s < toColex t ↔ s ≠ t ∧ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → a ∉ t → ∃ b, b ∈ t ∧ b ∉ s ∧ a ≤ b := by
simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, toColex_le_toColex, and_comm]
/-- If `s ⊆ t`, then `s ≤ t` in the colex order. Note the converse does not hold, as inclusion does
not form a linear order. -/
lemma toColex_mono : Monotone (toColex : Finset α → Colex α) :=
fun _s _t hst _a has hat ↦ (hat <| hst has).elim
/-- If `s ⊂ t`, then `s < t` in the colex order. Note the converse does not hold, as inclusion does
not form a linear order. -/
lemma toColex_strictMono : StrictMono (toColex : Finset α → Colex α) :=
toColex_mono.strictMono_of_injective toColex_injective
/-- If `s ⊆ t`, then `s ≤ t` in the colex order. Note the converse does not hold, as inclusion does
not form a linear order. -/
lemma toColex_le_toColex_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : toColex s ≤ toColex t := toColex_mono h
/-- If `s ⊂ t`, then `s < t` in the colex order. Note the converse does not hold, as inclusion does
not form a linear order. -/
lemma toColex_lt_toColex_of_ssubset (h : s ⊂ t) : toColex s < toColex t := toColex_strictMono h
instance instOrderBot : OrderBot (Colex α) where
bot := toColex ∅
bot_le s a ha := by cases ha
@[simp] lemma toColex_empty : toColex (∅ : Finset α) = ⊥ := rfl
@[simp] lemma ofColex_bot : ofColex (⊥ : Colex α) = ∅ := rfl
/-- If `s ≤ t` in colex, and all elements in `t` are small, then all elements in `s` are small. -/
lemma forall_le_mono (hst : toColex s ≤ toColex t) (ht : ∀ b ∈ t, b ≤ a) : ∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a := by
rintro b hb
by_cases b ∈ t
· exact ht _ ‹_›
· obtain ⟨c, hct, -, hbc⟩ := hst hb ‹_›
exact hbc.trans <| ht _ hct
/-- If `s ≤ t` in colex, and all elements in `t` are small, then all elements in `s` are small. -/
lemma forall_lt_mono (hst : toColex s ≤ toColex t) (ht : ∀ b ∈ t, b < a) : ∀ b ∈ s, b < a := by
rintro b hb
by_cases b ∈ t
· exact ht _ ‹_›
· obtain ⟨c, hct, -, hbc⟩ := hst hb ‹_›
exact hbc.trans_lt <| ht _ hct
/-- `s ≤ {a}` in colex iff all elements of `s` are strictly less than `a`, except possibly `a` in
which case `s = {a}`. -/
lemma toColex_le_singleton : toColex s ≤ toColex {a} ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a ∧ (a ∈ s → b = a) := by
simp only [toColex_le_toColex, mem_singleton, and_assoc, exists_eq_left]
refine forall₂_congr fun b _ ↦ ?_; obtain rfl | hba := eq_or_ne b a <;> aesop
/-- `s < {a}` in colex iff all elements of `s` are strictly less than `a`. -/
lemma toColex_lt_singleton : toColex s < toColex {a} ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, b < a := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, toColex_le_singleton, toColex_ne_toColex]
refine ⟨fun h b hb ↦ (h.1 _ hb).1.lt_of_ne ?_,
fun h ↦ ⟨fun b hb ↦ ⟨(h _ hb).le, fun ha ↦ (lt_irrefl _ <| h _ ha).elim⟩, ?_⟩⟩ <;> rintro rfl
· refine h.2 <| eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem.2 ⟨hb, fun c hc ↦ (h.1 _ hc).2 hb⟩
· simp at h
/-- `{a} ≤ s` in colex iff `s` contains an element greater than or equal to `a`. -/
lemma singleton_le_toColex : (toColex {a} : Colex α) ≤ toColex s ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, a ≤ x := by
simp [toColex_le_toColex]; by_cases a ∈ s <;> aesop
/-- Colex is an extension of the base order. -/
lemma singleton_le_singleton : (toColex {a} : Colex α) ≤ toColex {b} ↔ a ≤ b := by
simp [toColex_le_singleton, eq_comm]
/-- Colex is an extension of the base order. -/
lemma singleton_lt_singleton : (toColex {a} : Colex α) < toColex {b} ↔ a < b := by
simp [toColex_lt_singleton]
lemma le_iff_sdiff_subset_lowerClosure {s t : Colex α} :
s ≤ t ↔ (ofColex s : Set α) \ ofColex t ⊆ lowerClosure (ofColex t \ ofColex s : Set α) := by
simp [le_def, Set.subset_def, and_assoc]
section DecidableEq
variable [DecidableEq α]
instance instDecidableEq : DecidableEq (Colex α) := fun s t ↦
decidable_of_iff' (s.ofColex = t.ofColex) Colex.ext_iff
instance instDecidableLE [DecidableLE α] : DecidableLE (Colex α) :=
fun s t ↦ decidable_of_iff'
(∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ ofColex s → a ∉ ofColex t → ∃ b, b ∈ ofColex t ∧ b ∉ ofColex s ∧ a ≤ b) Iff.rfl
| instance instDecidableLT [DecidableLE α] : DecidableLT (Colex α) :=
decidableLTOfDecidableLE
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Colex.lean | 227 | 229 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Units.Equiv
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Monoid
/-!
# Topological group with zero
In this file we define `HasContinuousInv₀` to be a mixin typeclass a type with `Inv` and
`Zero` (e.g., a `GroupWithZero`) such that `fun x ↦ x⁻¹` is continuous at all nonzero points. Any
normed (semi)field has this property. Currently the only example of `HasContinuousInv₀` in
`mathlib` which is not a normed field is the type `NNReal` (a.k.a. `ℝ≥0`) of nonnegative real
numbers.
Then we prove lemmas about continuity of `x ↦ x⁻¹` and `f / g` providing dot-style `*.inv₀` and
`*.div` operations on `Filter.Tendsto`, `ContinuousAt`, `ContinuousWithinAt`, `ContinuousOn`,
and `Continuous`. As a special case, we provide `*.div_const` operations that require only
`DivInvMonoid` and `ContinuousMul` instances.
All lemmas about `(⁻¹)` use `inv₀` in their names because lemmas without `₀` are used for
`IsTopologicalGroup`s. We also use `'` in the typeclass name `HasContinuousInv₀` for the sake of
consistency of notation.
On a `GroupWithZero` with continuous multiplication, we also define left and right multiplication
as homeomorphisms.
-/
open Topology Filter Function
/-!
### A `DivInvMonoid` with continuous multiplication
If `G₀` is a `DivInvMonoid` with continuous `(*)`, then `(/y)` is continuous for any `y`. In this
section we prove lemmas that immediately follow from this fact providing `*.div_const` dot-style
operations on `Filter.Tendsto`, `ContinuousAt`, `ContinuousWithinAt`, `ContinuousOn`, and
`Continuous`.
-/
variable {α β G₀ : Type*}
section DivConst
variable [DivInvMonoid G₀] [TopologicalSpace G₀] [ContinuousMul G₀] {f : α → G₀} {s : Set α}
{l : Filter α}
theorem Filter.Tendsto.div_const {x : G₀} (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (y : G₀) :
Tendsto (fun a => f a / y) l (𝓝 (x / y)) := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using hf.mul tendsto_const_nhds
variable [TopologicalSpace α]
nonrec theorem ContinuousAt.div_const {a : α} (hf : ContinuousAt f a) (y : G₀) :
ContinuousAt (fun x => f x / y) a :=
hf.div_const y
nonrec theorem ContinuousWithinAt.div_const {a} (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s a) (y : G₀) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => f x / y) s a :=
hf.div_const _
theorem ContinuousOn.div_const (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (y : G₀) :
ContinuousOn (fun x => f x / y) s := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using hf.mul continuousOn_const
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.div_const (hf : Continuous f) (y : G₀) : Continuous fun x => f x / y := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using hf.mul continuous_const
end DivConst
/-- A type with `0` and `Inv` such that `fun x ↦ x⁻¹` is continuous at all nonzero points. Any
normed (semi)field has this property. -/
class HasContinuousInv₀ (G₀ : Type*) [Zero G₀] [Inv G₀] [TopologicalSpace G₀] : Prop where
/-- The map `fun x ↦ x⁻¹` is continuous at all nonzero points. -/
continuousAt_inv₀ : ∀ ⦃x : G₀⦄, x ≠ 0 → ContinuousAt Inv.inv x
export HasContinuousInv₀ (continuousAt_inv₀)
section Inv₀
variable [Zero G₀] [Inv G₀] [TopologicalSpace G₀] [HasContinuousInv₀ G₀] {l : Filter α} {f : α → G₀}
{s : Set α} {a : α}
/-!
### Continuity of `fun x ↦ x⁻¹` at a non-zero point
We define `HasContinuousInv₀` to be a `GroupWithZero` such that the operation `x ↦ x⁻¹`
is continuous at all nonzero points. In this section we prove dot-style `*.inv₀` lemmas for
`Filter.Tendsto`, `ContinuousAt`, `ContinuousWithinAt`, `ContinuousOn`, and `Continuous`.
-/
theorem tendsto_inv₀ {x : G₀} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Tendsto Inv.inv (𝓝 x) (𝓝 x⁻¹) :=
continuousAt_inv₀ hx
theorem continuousOn_inv₀ : ContinuousOn (Inv.inv : G₀ → G₀) {0}ᶜ := fun _x hx =>
(continuousAt_inv₀ hx).continuousWithinAt
/-- If a function converges to a nonzero value, its inverse converges to the inverse of this value.
We use the name `Filter.Tendsto.inv₀` as `Filter.Tendsto.inv` is already used in multiplicative
topological groups. -/
theorem Filter.Tendsto.inv₀ {a : G₀} (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
Tendsto (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) l (𝓝 a⁻¹) :=
(tendsto_inv₀ ha).comp hf
variable [TopologicalSpace α]
nonrec theorem ContinuousWithinAt.inv₀ (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s a) (ha : f a ≠ 0) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) s a :=
hf.inv₀ ha
@[fun_prop]
nonrec theorem ContinuousAt.inv₀ (hf : ContinuousAt f a) (ha : f a ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) a :=
hf.inv₀ ha
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.inv₀ (hf : Continuous f) (h0 : ∀ x, f x ≠ 0) : Continuous fun x => (f x)⁻¹ :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun x => (hf.tendsto x).inv₀ (h0 x)
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousOn.inv₀ (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (h0 : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0) :
ContinuousOn (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).inv₀ (h0 x hx)
end Inv₀
/-- If `G₀` is a group with zero with topology such that `x ↦ x⁻¹` is continuous at all nonzero
points. Then the coercion `G₀ˣ → G₀` is a topological embedding. -/
theorem Units.isEmbedding_val₀ [GroupWithZero G₀] [TopologicalSpace G₀] [HasContinuousInv₀ G₀] :
IsEmbedding (val : G₀ˣ → G₀) :=
embedding_val_mk <| (continuousOn_inv₀ (G₀ := G₀)).mono fun _ ↦ IsUnit.ne_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias Units.embedding_val₀ := Units.isEmbedding_val₀
section NhdsInv
variable [GroupWithZero G₀] [TopologicalSpace G₀] [HasContinuousInv₀ G₀] {x : G₀}
lemma nhds_inv₀ (hx : x ≠ 0) : 𝓝 x⁻¹ = (𝓝 x)⁻¹ := by
refine le_antisymm (inv_le_iff_le_inv.1 ?_) (tendsto_inv₀ hx)
simpa only [inv_inv] using tendsto_inv₀ (inv_ne_zero hx)
lemma tendsto_inv_iff₀ {l : Filter α} {f : α → G₀} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
Tendsto (fun x ↦ (f x)⁻¹) l (𝓝 x⁻¹) ↔ Tendsto f l (𝓝 x) := by
simp only [nhds_inv₀ hx, ← Filter.comap_inv, tendsto_comap_iff, Function.comp_def, inv_inv]
end NhdsInv
/-!
### Continuity of division
If `G₀` is a `GroupWithZero` with `x ↦ x⁻¹` continuous at all nonzero points and `(*)`, then
division `(/)` is continuous at any point where the denominator is continuous.
-/
section Div
variable [GroupWithZero G₀] [TopologicalSpace G₀] [HasContinuousInv₀ G₀] [ContinuousMul G₀]
{f g : α → G₀}
theorem Filter.Tendsto.div {l : Filter α} {a b : G₀} (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a))
(hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 b)) (hy : b ≠ 0) : Tendsto (f / g) l (𝓝 (a / b)) := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using hf.mul (hg.inv₀ hy)
theorem Filter.tendsto_mul_iff_of_ne_zero [T1Space G₀] {f g : α → G₀} {l : Filter α} {x y : G₀}
(hg : Tendsto g l (𝓝 y)) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
Tendsto (fun n => f n * g n) l (𝓝 <| x * y) ↔ Tendsto f l (𝓝 x) := by
refine ⟨fun hfg => ?_, fun hf => hf.mul hg⟩
rw [← mul_div_cancel_right₀ x hy]
refine Tendsto.congr' ?_ (hfg.div hg hy)
exact (hg.eventually_ne hy).mono fun n hn => mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hn
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α} {a : α}
nonrec theorem ContinuousWithinAt.div (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s a)
(hg : ContinuousWithinAt g s a) (h₀ : g a ≠ 0) : ContinuousWithinAt (f / g) s a :=
hf.div hg h₀
theorem ContinuousOn.div (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hg : ContinuousOn g s) (h₀ : ∀ x ∈ s, g x ≠ 0) :
ContinuousOn (f / g) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).div (hg x hx) (h₀ x hx)
/-- Continuity at a point of the result of dividing two functions continuous at that point, where
the denominator is nonzero. -/
nonrec theorem ContinuousAt.div (hf : ContinuousAt f a) (hg : ContinuousAt g a) (h₀ : g a ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (f / g) a :=
hf.div hg h₀
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.div (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) (h₀ : ∀ x, g x ≠ 0) :
Continuous (f / g) := by simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using hf.mul (hg.inv₀ h₀)
theorem continuousOn_div : ContinuousOn (fun p : G₀ × G₀ => p.1 / p.2) { p | p.2 ≠ 0 } :=
continuousOn_fst.div continuousOn_snd fun _ => id
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.div₀ (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) (h₀ : ∀ x, g x ≠ 0) :
Continuous (fun x => f x / g x) := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using hf.mul (hg.inv₀ h₀)
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousAt.div₀ (hf : ContinuousAt f a) (hg : ContinuousAt g a) (h₀ : g a ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (fun x => f x / g x) a := ContinuousAt.div hf hg h₀
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousOn.div₀ (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hg : ContinuousOn g s) (h₀ : ∀ x ∈ s, g x ≠ 0) :
ContinuousOn (fun x => f x / g x) s := ContinuousOn.div hf hg h₀
/-- The function `f x / g x` is discontinuous when `g x = 0`. However, under appropriate
conditions, `h x (f x / g x)` is still continuous. The condition is that if `g a = 0` then `h x y`
must tend to `h a 0` when `x` tends to `a`, with no information about `y`. This is represented by
the `⊤` filter. Note: `tendsto_prod_top_iff` characterizes this convergence in uniform spaces. See
also `Filter.prod_top` and `Filter.mem_prod_top`. -/
theorem ContinuousAt.comp_div_cases {f g : α → G₀} (h : α → G₀ → β) (hf : ContinuousAt f a)
(hg : ContinuousAt g a) (hh : g a ≠ 0 → ContinuousAt (↿h) (a, f a / g a))
(h2h : g a = 0 → Tendsto (↿h) (𝓝 a ×ˢ ⊤) (𝓝 (h a 0))) :
| ContinuousAt (fun x => h x (f x / g x)) a := by
show ContinuousAt (↿h ∘ fun x => (x, f x / g x)) a
by_cases hga : g a = 0
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/GroupWithZero.lean | 219 | 221 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Bryan Gin-ge Chen
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Heyting.Basic
/-!
# (Generalized) Boolean algebras
A Boolean algebra is a bounded distributive lattice with a complement operator. Boolean algebras
generalize the (classical) logic of propositions and the lattice of subsets of a set.
Generalized Boolean algebras may be less familiar, but they are essentially Boolean algebras which
do not necessarily have a top element (`⊤`) (and hence not all elements may have complements). One
example in mathlib is `Finset α`, the type of all finite subsets of an arbitrary
(not-necessarily-finite) type `α`.
`GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α` is defined to be a distributive lattice with bottom (`⊥`) admitting
a *relative* complement operator, written using "set difference" notation as `x \ y` (`sdiff x y`).
For convenience, the `BooleanAlgebra` type class is defined to extend `GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra`
so that it is also bundled with a `\` operator.
(A terminological point: `x \ y` is the complement of `y` relative to the interval `[⊥, x]`. We do
not yet have relative complements for arbitrary intervals, as we do not even have lattice
intervals.)
## Main declarations
* `GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra`: a type class for generalized Boolean algebras
* `BooleanAlgebra`: a type class for Boolean algebras.
* `Prop.booleanAlgebra`: the Boolean algebra instance on `Prop`
## Implementation notes
The `sup_inf_sdiff` and `inf_inf_sdiff` axioms for the relative complement operator in
`GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra` are taken from
[Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boolean_algebra_(structure)#Generalizations).
[Stone's paper introducing generalized Boolean algebras][Stone1935] does not define a relative
complement operator `a \ b` for all `a`, `b`. Instead, the postulates there amount to an assumption
that for all `a, b : α` where `a ≤ b`, the equations `x ⊔ a = b` and `x ⊓ a = ⊥` have a solution
`x`. `Disjoint.sdiff_unique` proves that this `x` is in fact `b \ a`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boolean_algebra_(structure)#Generalizations>
* [*Postulates for Boolean Algebras and Generalized Boolean Algebras*, M.H. Stone][Stone1935]
* [*Lattice Theory: Foundation*, George Grätzer][Gratzer2011]
## Tags
generalized Boolean algebras, Boolean algebras, lattices, sdiff, compl
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function OrderDual
universe u v
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type*} {x y z : α}
/-!
### Generalized Boolean algebras
Some of the lemmas in this section are from:
* [*Lattice Theory: Foundation*, George Grätzer][Gratzer2011]
* <https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/relative+complement>
* <https://people.math.gatech.edu/~mccuan/courses/4317/symmetricdifference.pdf>
-/
/-- A generalized Boolean algebra is a distributive lattice with `⊥` and a relative complement
operation `\` (called `sdiff`, after "set difference") satisfying `(a ⊓ b) ⊔ (a \ b) = a` and
`(a ⊓ b) ⊓ (a \ b) = ⊥`, i.e. `a \ b` is the complement of `b` in `a`.
This is a generalization of Boolean algebras which applies to `Finset α` for arbitrary
(not-necessarily-`Fintype`) `α`. -/
class GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra (α : Type u) extends DistribLattice α, SDiff α, Bot α where
/-- For any `a`, `b`, `(a ⊓ b) ⊔ (a / b) = a` -/
sup_inf_sdiff : ∀ a b : α, a ⊓ b ⊔ a \ b = a
/-- For any `a`, `b`, `(a ⊓ b) ⊓ (a / b) = ⊥` -/
inf_inf_sdiff : ∀ a b : α, a ⊓ b ⊓ a \ b = ⊥
-- We might want an `IsCompl_of` predicate (for relative complements) generalizing `IsCompl`,
-- however we'd need another type class for lattices with bot, and all the API for that.
section GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α]
@[simp]
theorem sup_inf_sdiff (x y : α) : x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ y = x :=
GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.sup_inf_sdiff _ _
@[simp]
theorem inf_inf_sdiff (x y : α) : x ⊓ y ⊓ x \ y = ⊥ :=
GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.inf_inf_sdiff _ _
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_inf (x y : α) : x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ y = x := by rw [sup_comm, sup_inf_sdiff]
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_inf (x y : α) : x \ y ⊓ (x ⊓ y) = ⊥ := by rw [inf_comm, inf_inf_sdiff]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toOrderBot : OrderBot α where
__ := GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toBot
bot_le a := by
rw [← inf_inf_sdiff a a, inf_assoc]
exact inf_le_left
theorem disjoint_inf_sdiff : Disjoint (x ⊓ y) (x \ y) :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr (inf_inf_sdiff x y).le
-- TODO: in distributive lattices, relative complements are unique when they exist
theorem sdiff_unique (s : x ⊓ y ⊔ z = x) (i : x ⊓ y ⊓ z = ⊥) : x \ y = z := by
conv_rhs at s => rw [← sup_inf_sdiff x y, sup_comm]
rw [sup_comm] at s
conv_rhs at i => rw [← inf_inf_sdiff x y, inf_comm]
rw [inf_comm] at i
exact (eq_of_inf_eq_sup_eq i s).symm
-- Use `sdiff_le`
private theorem sdiff_le' : x \ y ≤ x :=
calc
x \ y ≤ x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ y := le_sup_right
_ = x := sup_inf_sdiff x y
-- Use `sdiff_sup_self`
private theorem sdiff_sup_self' : y \ x ⊔ x = y ⊔ x :=
calc
y \ x ⊔ x = y \ x ⊔ (x ⊔ x ⊓ y) := by rw [sup_inf_self]
_ = y ⊓ x ⊔ y \ x ⊔ x := by ac_rfl
_ = y ⊔ x := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inf_sdiff : x \ y ⊓ y \ x = ⊥ :=
Eq.symm <|
calc
⊥ = x ⊓ y ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_inf_sdiff]
_ = x ⊓ (y ⊓ x ⊔ y \ x) ⊓ x \ y := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = (x ⊓ (y ⊓ x) ⊔ x ⊓ y \ x) ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_sup_left]
_ = (y ⊓ (x ⊓ x) ⊔ x ⊓ y \ x) ⊓ x \ y := by ac_rfl
_ = (y ⊓ x ⊔ x ⊓ y \ x) ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_idem]
_ = x ⊓ y ⊓ x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ y \ x ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_sup_right, inf_comm x y]
_ = x ⊓ y \ x ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_inf_sdiff, bot_sup_eq]
_ = x ⊓ x \ y ⊓ y \ x := by ac_rfl
_ = x \ y ⊓ y \ x := by rw [inf_of_le_right sdiff_le']
theorem disjoint_sdiff_sdiff : Disjoint (x \ y) (y \ x) :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr sdiff_inf_sdiff.le
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_self_right : x ⊓ y \ x = ⊥ :=
calc
x ⊓ y \ x = (x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ y) ⊓ y \ x := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = x ⊓ y ⊓ y \ x ⊔ x \ y ⊓ y \ x := by rw [inf_sup_right]
_ = ⊥ := by rw [inf_comm x y, inf_inf_sdiff, sdiff_inf_sdiff, bot_sup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_self_left : y \ x ⊓ x = ⊥ := by rw [inf_comm, inf_sdiff_self_right]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra :
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α where
__ := ‹GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α›
__ := GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toOrderBot
sdiff := (· \ ·)
sdiff_le_iff y x z :=
⟨fun h =>
le_of_inf_le_sup_le
(le_of_eq
(calc
y ⊓ y \ x = y \ x := inf_of_le_right sdiff_le'
_ = x ⊓ y \ x ⊔ z ⊓ y \ x := by
rw [inf_eq_right.2 h, inf_sdiff_self_right, bot_sup_eq]
_ = (x ⊔ z) ⊓ y \ x := by rw [← inf_sup_right]))
(calc
y ⊔ y \ x = y := sup_of_le_left sdiff_le'
_ ≤ y ⊔ (x ⊔ z) := le_sup_left
_ = y \ x ⊔ x ⊔ z := by rw [← sup_assoc, ← @sdiff_sup_self' _ x y]
_ = x ⊔ z ⊔ y \ x := by ac_rfl),
fun h =>
le_of_inf_le_sup_le
(calc
y \ x ⊓ x = ⊥ := inf_sdiff_self_left
_ ≤ z ⊓ x := bot_le)
(calc
y \ x ⊔ x = y ⊔ x := sdiff_sup_self'
_ ≤ x ⊔ z ⊔ x := sup_le_sup_right h x
_ ≤ z ⊔ x := by rw [sup_assoc, sup_comm, sup_assoc, sup_idem])⟩
theorem disjoint_sdiff_self_left : Disjoint (y \ x) x :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr inf_sdiff_self_left.le
theorem disjoint_sdiff_self_right : Disjoint x (y \ x) :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr inf_sdiff_self_right.le
lemma le_sdiff : x ≤ y \ z ↔ x ≤ y ∧ Disjoint x z :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.trans sdiff_le, disjoint_sdiff_self_left.mono_left h⟩, fun h ↦
by rw [← h.2.sdiff_eq_left]; exact sdiff_le_sdiff_right h.1⟩
@[simp] lemma sdiff_eq_left : x \ y = x ↔ Disjoint x y :=
⟨fun h ↦ disjoint_sdiff_self_left.mono_left h.ge, Disjoint.sdiff_eq_left⟩
/- TODO: we could make an alternative constructor for `GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra` using
`Disjoint x (y \ x)` and `x ⊔ (y \ x) = y` as axioms. -/
theorem Disjoint.sdiff_eq_of_sup_eq (hi : Disjoint x z) (hs : x ⊔ z = y) : y \ x = z :=
have h : y ⊓ x = x := inf_eq_right.2 <| le_sup_left.trans hs.le
sdiff_unique (by rw [h, hs]) (by rw [h, hi.eq_bot])
protected theorem Disjoint.sdiff_unique (hd : Disjoint x z) (hz : z ≤ y) (hs : y ≤ x ⊔ z) :
y \ x = z :=
sdiff_unique
(by
rw [← inf_eq_right] at hs
rwa [sup_inf_right, inf_sup_right, sup_comm x, inf_sup_self, inf_comm, sup_comm z,
hs, sup_eq_left])
(by rw [inf_assoc, hd.eq_bot, inf_bot_eq])
-- cf. `IsCompl.disjoint_left_iff` and `IsCompl.disjoint_right_iff`
theorem disjoint_sdiff_iff_le (hz : z ≤ y) (hx : x ≤ y) : Disjoint z (y \ x) ↔ z ≤ x :=
⟨fun H =>
le_of_inf_le_sup_le (le_trans H.le_bot bot_le)
(by
rw [sup_sdiff_cancel_right hx]
refine le_trans (sup_le_sup_left sdiff_le z) ?_
rw [sup_eq_right.2 hz]),
fun H => disjoint_sdiff_self_right.mono_left H⟩
-- cf. `IsCompl.le_left_iff` and `IsCompl.le_right_iff`
theorem le_iff_disjoint_sdiff (hz : z ≤ y) (hx : x ≤ y) : z ≤ x ↔ Disjoint z (y \ x) :=
(disjoint_sdiff_iff_le hz hx).symm
-- cf. `IsCompl.inf_left_eq_bot_iff` and `IsCompl.inf_right_eq_bot_iff`
theorem inf_sdiff_eq_bot_iff (hz : z ≤ y) (hx : x ≤ y) : z ⊓ y \ x = ⊥ ↔ z ≤ x := by
rw [← disjoint_iff]
exact disjoint_sdiff_iff_le hz hx
-- cf. `IsCompl.left_le_iff` and `IsCompl.right_le_iff`
theorem le_iff_eq_sup_sdiff (hz : z ≤ y) (hx : x ≤ y) : x ≤ z ↔ y = z ⊔ y \ x :=
⟨fun H => by
apply le_antisymm
· conv_lhs => rw [← sup_inf_sdiff y x]
apply sup_le_sup_right
rwa [inf_eq_right.2 hx]
· apply le_trans
· apply sup_le_sup_right hz
· rw [sup_sdiff_left],
fun H => by
conv_lhs at H => rw [← sup_sdiff_cancel_right hx]
refine le_of_inf_le_sup_le ?_ H.le
rw [inf_sdiff_self_right]
exact bot_le⟩
-- cf. `IsCompl.sup_inf`
theorem sdiff_sup : y \ (x ⊔ z) = y \ x ⊓ y \ z :=
sdiff_unique
(calc
y ⊓ (x ⊔ z) ⊔ y \ x ⊓ y \ z = (y ⊓ (x ⊔ z) ⊔ y \ x) ⊓ (y ⊓ (x ⊔ z) ⊔ y \ z) := by
rw [sup_inf_left]
_ = (y ⊓ x ⊔ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ x) ⊓ (y ⊓ x ⊔ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z) := by rw [@inf_sup_left _ _ y]
_ = (y ⊓ z ⊔ (y ⊓ x ⊔ y \ x)) ⊓ (y ⊓ x ⊔ (y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z)) := by ac_rfl
_ = (y ⊓ z ⊔ y) ⊓ (y ⊓ x ⊔ y) := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff, sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = (y ⊔ y ⊓ z) ⊓ (y ⊔ y ⊓ x) := by ac_rfl
_ = y := by rw [sup_inf_self, sup_inf_self, inf_idem])
(calc
y ⊓ (x ⊔ z) ⊓ (y \ x ⊓ y \ z) = (y ⊓ x ⊔ y ⊓ z) ⊓ (y \ x ⊓ y \ z) := by rw [inf_sup_left]
_ = y ⊓ x ⊓ (y \ x ⊓ y \ z) ⊔ y ⊓ z ⊓ (y \ x ⊓ y \ z) := by rw [inf_sup_right]
_ = y ⊓ x ⊓ y \ x ⊓ y \ z ⊔ y \ x ⊓ (y \ z ⊓ (y ⊓ z)) := by ac_rfl
_ = ⊥ := by rw [inf_inf_sdiff, bot_inf_eq, bot_sup_eq, inf_comm (y \ z),
inf_inf_sdiff, inf_bot_eq])
theorem sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff_inf_eq_inf : y \ x = y \ z ↔ y ⊓ x = y ⊓ z :=
⟨fun h => eq_of_inf_eq_sup_eq (a := y \ x) (by rw [inf_inf_sdiff, h, inf_inf_sdiff])
(by rw [sup_inf_sdiff, h, sup_inf_sdiff]),
fun h => by rw [← sdiff_inf_self_right, ← sdiff_inf_self_right z y, inf_comm, h, inf_comm]⟩
theorem sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint : x \ y = x ↔ Disjoint y x :=
calc
x \ y = x ↔ x \ y = x \ ⊥ := by rw [sdiff_bot]
_ ↔ x ⊓ y = x ⊓ ⊥ := sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff_inf_eq_inf
_ ↔ Disjoint y x := by rw [inf_bot_eq, inf_comm, disjoint_iff]
theorem sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint' : x \ y = x ↔ Disjoint x y := by
rw [sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint, disjoint_comm]
theorem sdiff_lt (hx : y ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ ⊥) : x \ y < x := by
refine sdiff_le.lt_of_ne fun h => hy ?_
rw [sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint', disjoint_iff] at h
rw [← h, inf_eq_right.mpr hx]
theorem sdiff_lt_left : x \ y < x ↔ ¬ Disjoint y x := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, Ne, sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint, and_iff_right sdiff_le]
@[simp]
theorem le_sdiff_right : x ≤ y \ x ↔ x = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => disjoint_self.1 (disjoint_sdiff_self_right.mono_right h), fun h => h.le.trans bot_le⟩
@[simp] lemma sdiff_eq_right : x \ y = y ↔ x = ⊥ ∧ y = ⊥ := by
rw [disjoint_sdiff_self_left.eq_iff]; aesop
lemma sdiff_ne_right : x \ y ≠ y ↔ x ≠ ⊥ ∨ y ≠ ⊥ := sdiff_eq_right.not.trans not_and_or
theorem sdiff_lt_sdiff_right (h : x < y) (hz : z ≤ x) : x \ z < y \ z :=
(sdiff_le_sdiff_right h.le).lt_of_not_le
fun h' => h.not_le <| le_sdiff_sup.trans <| sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right h' hz
theorem sup_inf_inf_sdiff : x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z = x ⊓ y ⊔ y \ z :=
calc
x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z = x ⊓ (y ⊓ z) ⊔ y \ z := by rw [inf_assoc]
_ = (x ⊔ y \ z) ⊓ y := by rw [sup_inf_right, sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = x ⊓ y ⊔ y \ z := by rw [inf_sup_right, inf_sdiff_left]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_right : x \ (y \ z) = x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ y ⊓ z := by
rw [sup_comm, inf_comm, ← inf_assoc, sup_inf_inf_sdiff]
apply sdiff_unique
· calc
x ⊓ y \ z ⊔ (z ⊓ x ⊔ x \ y) = (x ⊔ (z ⊓ x ⊔ x \ y)) ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ (z ⊓ x ⊔ x \ y)) := by
rw [sup_inf_right]
_ = (x ⊔ x ⊓ z ⊔ x \ y) ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ (x ⊓ z ⊔ x \ y)) := by ac_rfl
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ x ⊓ z ⊔ x \ y) := by rw [sup_inf_self, sup_sdiff_left, ← sup_assoc]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊓ (z ⊔ y) ⊔ x ⊓ (z ⊔ y) ⊔ x \ y) := by
rw [sup_inf_left, sdiff_sup_self', inf_sup_right, sup_comm y]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ (x ⊓ z ⊔ x ⊓ y) ⊔ x \ y) := by
rw [inf_sdiff_sup_right, @inf_sup_left _ _ x z y]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ (x ⊓ z ⊔ (x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ y))) := by ac_rfl
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊔ (x ⊔ x ⊓ z)) := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff, sup_comm (x ⊓ z)]
_ = x := by rw [sup_inf_self, sup_comm, inf_sup_self]
· calc
x ⊓ y \ z ⊓ (z ⊓ x ⊔ x \ y) = x ⊓ y \ z ⊓ (z ⊓ x) ⊔ x ⊓ y \ z ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_sup_left]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊓ z ⊓ x) ⊔ x ⊓ y \ z ⊓ x \ y := by ac_rfl
_ = x ⊓ y \ z ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_sdiff_self_left, bot_inf_eq, inf_bot_eq, bot_sup_eq]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊓ y) ⊓ x \ y := by conv_lhs => rw [← inf_sdiff_left]
_ = x ⊓ (y \ z ⊓ (y ⊓ x \ y)) := by ac_rfl
_ = ⊥ := by rw [inf_sdiff_self_right, inf_bot_eq, inf_bot_eq]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_right' : x \ (y \ z) = x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ z :=
calc
x \ (y \ z) = x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ y ⊓ z := sdiff_sdiff_right
_ = z ⊓ x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ y := by ac_rfl
_ = x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ z := by rw [sup_inf_inf_sdiff, sup_comm, inf_comm]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_eq_sdiff_sup (h : z ≤ x) : x \ (y \ z) = x \ y ⊔ z := by
rw [sdiff_sdiff_right', inf_eq_right.2 h]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_right_self : x \ (x \ y) = x ⊓ y := by
rw [sdiff_sdiff_right, inf_idem, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_eq_self (h : y ≤ x) : x \ (x \ y) = y := by
rw [sdiff_sdiff_right_self, inf_of_le_right h]
theorem sdiff_eq_symm (hy : y ≤ x) (h : x \ y = z) : x \ z = y := by
rw [← h, sdiff_sdiff_eq_self hy]
theorem sdiff_eq_comm (hy : y ≤ x) (hz : z ≤ x) : x \ y = z ↔ x \ z = y :=
⟨sdiff_eq_symm hy, sdiff_eq_symm hz⟩
theorem eq_of_sdiff_eq_sdiff (hxz : x ≤ z) (hyz : y ≤ z) (h : z \ x = z \ y) : x = y := by
rw [← sdiff_sdiff_eq_self hxz, h, sdiff_sdiff_eq_self hyz]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_iff_le (hx : x ≤ z) (hy : y ≤ z) : z \ x ≤ z \ y ↔ y ≤ x := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, sdiff_le_sdiff_left⟩
rw [← sdiff_sdiff_eq_self hx, ← sdiff_sdiff_eq_self hy]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_left h
theorem sdiff_sdiff_left' : (x \ y) \ z = x \ y ⊓ x \ z := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_left, sdiff_sup]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_sup_sdiff : z \ (x \ y ⊔ y \ x) = z ⊓ (z \ x ⊔ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ x) :=
calc
z \ (x \ y ⊔ y \ x) = (z \ x ⊔ z ⊓ x ⊓ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ z ⊓ y ⊓ x) := by
rw [sdiff_sup, sdiff_sdiff_right, sdiff_sdiff_right]
_ = z ⊓ (z \ x ⊔ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ z ⊓ y ⊓ x) := by rw [sup_inf_left, sup_comm, sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = z ⊓ (z \ x ⊔ y) ⊓ (z ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ x)) := by
rw [sup_inf_left, sup_comm (z \ y), sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = z ⊓ z ⊓ (z \ x ⊔ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ x) := by ac_rfl
_ = z ⊓ (z \ x ⊔ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ x) := by rw [inf_idem]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_sup_sdiff' : z \ (x \ y ⊔ y \ x) = z ⊓ x ⊓ y ⊔ z \ x ⊓ z \ y :=
calc
z \ (x \ y ⊔ y \ x) = z \ (x \ y) ⊓ z \ (y \ x) := sdiff_sup
_ = (z \ x ⊔ z ⊓ x ⊓ y) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ z ⊓ y ⊓ x) := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_right, sdiff_sdiff_right]
_ = (z \ x ⊔ z ⊓ y ⊓ x) ⊓ (z \ y ⊔ z ⊓ y ⊓ x) := by ac_rfl
_ = z \ x ⊓ z \ y ⊔ z ⊓ y ⊓ x := by rw [← sup_inf_right]
_ = z ⊓ x ⊓ y ⊔ z \ x ⊓ z \ y := by ac_rfl
lemma sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_cancel_left (hca : z ≤ x) : (x \ y) \ (x \ z) = z \ y :=
sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff.antisymm <|
(disjoint_sdiff_self_right.mono_left sdiff_le).le_sdiff_of_le_left <| sdiff_le_sdiff_right hca
lemma sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_cancel_right (hcb : z ≤ y) : (x \ z) \ (y \ z) = x \ y := by
rw [le_antisymm_iff, sdiff_le_comm]
exact ⟨sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff,
(disjoint_sdiff_self_left.mono_right sdiff_le).le_sdiff_of_le_left <| sdiff_le_sdiff_left hcb⟩
theorem inf_sdiff : (x ⊓ y) \ z = x \ z ⊓ y \ z :=
sdiff_unique
(calc
x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ x \ z ⊓ y \ z = (x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ x \ z) ⊓ (x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z) := by rw [sup_inf_left]
_ = (x ⊓ y ⊓ (z ⊔ x) ⊔ x \ z) ⊓ (x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z) := by
rw [sup_inf_right, sup_sdiff_self_right, inf_sup_right, inf_sdiff_sup_right]
_ = (y ⊓ (x ⊓ (x ⊔ z)) ⊔ x \ z) ⊓ (x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z) := by ac_rfl
_ = (y ⊓ x ⊔ x \ z) ⊓ (x ⊓ y ⊔ y \ z) := by rw [inf_sup_self, sup_inf_inf_sdiff]
_ = x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ z ⊓ y \ z := by rw [inf_comm y, sup_inf_left]
_ = x ⊓ y := sup_eq_left.2 (inf_le_inf sdiff_le sdiff_le))
(calc
x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊓ (x \ z ⊓ y \ z) = x ⊓ y ⊓ (z ⊓ x \ z) ⊓ y \ z := by ac_rfl
_ = ⊥ := by rw [inf_sdiff_self_right, inf_bot_eq, bot_inf_eq])
/-- See also `sdiff_inf_right_comm`. -/
theorem inf_sdiff_assoc (x y z : α) : (x ⊓ y) \ z = x ⊓ y \ z :=
sdiff_unique
(calc
x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊔ x ⊓ y \ z = x ⊓ (y ⊓ z) ⊔ x ⊓ y \ z := by rw [inf_assoc]
_ = x ⊓ (y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z) := by rw [← inf_sup_left]
_ = x ⊓ y := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff])
(calc
x ⊓ y ⊓ z ⊓ (x ⊓ y \ z) = x ⊓ x ⊓ (y ⊓ z ⊓ y \ z) := by ac_rfl
_ = ⊥ := by rw [inf_inf_sdiff, inf_bot_eq])
/-- See also `inf_sdiff_assoc`. -/
theorem sdiff_inf_right_comm (x y z : α) : x \ z ⊓ y = (x ⊓ y) \ z := by
rw [inf_comm x, inf_comm, inf_sdiff_assoc]
lemma inf_sdiff_left_comm (a b c : α) : a ⊓ (b \ c) = b ⊓ (a \ c) := by
simp_rw [← inf_sdiff_assoc, inf_comm]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-08")] alias inf_sdiff_right_comm := sdiff_inf_right_comm
theorem inf_sdiff_distrib_left (a b c : α) : a ⊓ b \ c = (a ⊓ b) \ (a ⊓ c) := by
rw [sdiff_inf, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 inf_le_left, bot_sup_eq, inf_sdiff_assoc]
theorem inf_sdiff_distrib_right (a b c : α) : a \ b ⊓ c = (a ⊓ c) \ (b ⊓ c) := by
simp_rw [inf_comm _ c, inf_sdiff_distrib_left]
theorem disjoint_sdiff_comm : Disjoint (x \ z) y ↔ Disjoint x (y \ z) := by
simp_rw [disjoint_iff, sdiff_inf_right_comm, inf_sdiff_assoc]
theorem sup_eq_sdiff_sup_sdiff_sup_inf : x ⊔ y = x \ y ⊔ y \ x ⊔ x ⊓ y :=
Eq.symm <|
calc
x \ y ⊔ y \ x ⊔ x ⊓ y = (x \ y ⊔ y \ x ⊔ x) ⊓ (x \ y ⊔ y \ x ⊔ y) := by rw [sup_inf_left]
_ = (x \ y ⊔ x ⊔ y \ x) ⊓ (x \ y ⊔ (y \ x ⊔ y)) := by ac_rfl
_ = (x ⊔ y \ x) ⊓ (x \ y ⊔ y) := by rw [sup_sdiff_right, sup_sdiff_right]
_ = x ⊔ y := by rw [sup_sdiff_self_right, sup_sdiff_self_left, inf_idem]
theorem sup_lt_of_lt_sdiff_left (h : y < z \ x) (hxz : x ≤ z) : x ⊔ y < z := by
rw [← sup_sdiff_cancel_right hxz]
refine (sup_le_sup_left h.le _).lt_of_not_le fun h' => h.not_le ?_
rw [← sdiff_idem]
exact (sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_left h').trans sdiff_le
theorem sup_lt_of_lt_sdiff_right (h : x < z \ y) (hyz : y ≤ z) : x ⊔ y < z := by
rw [← sdiff_sup_cancel hyz]
refine (sup_le_sup_right h.le _).lt_of_not_le fun h' => h.not_le ?_
rw [← sdiff_idem]
exact (sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_right h').trans sdiff_le
instance Prod.instGeneralizedBooleanAlgebra [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra β] :
GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra (α × β) where
sup_inf_sdiff _ _ := Prod.ext (sup_inf_sdiff _ _) (sup_inf_sdiff _ _)
inf_inf_sdiff _ _ := Prod.ext (inf_inf_sdiff _ _) (inf_inf_sdiff _ _)
-- Porting note: Once `pi_instance` has been ported, this is just `by pi_instance`.
instance Pi.instGeneralizedBooleanAlgebra {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra (α i)] : GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
sup_inf_sdiff := fun f g => funext fun a => sup_inf_sdiff (f a) (g a)
inf_inf_sdiff := fun f g => funext fun a => inf_inf_sdiff (f a) (g a)
end GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
/-!
### Boolean algebras
-/
/-- A Boolean algebra is a bounded distributive lattice with a complement operator `ᶜ` such that
`x ⊓ xᶜ = ⊥` and `x ⊔ xᶜ = ⊤`. For convenience, it must also provide a set difference operation `\`
and a Heyting implication `⇨` satisfying `x \ y = x ⊓ yᶜ` and `x ⇨ y = y ⊔ xᶜ`.
This is a generalization of (classical) logic of propositions, or the powerset lattice.
Since `BoundedOrder`, `OrderBot`, and `OrderTop` are mixins that require `LE`
to be present at define-time, the `extends` mechanism does not work with them.
Instead, we extend using the underlying `Bot` and `Top` data typeclasses, and replicate the
order axioms of those classes here. A "forgetful" instance back to `BoundedOrder` is provided.
-/
class BooleanAlgebra (α : Type u) extends
DistribLattice α, HasCompl α, SDiff α, HImp α, Top α, Bot α where
/-- The infimum of `x` and `xᶜ` is at most `⊥` -/
inf_compl_le_bot : ∀ x : α, x ⊓ xᶜ ≤ ⊥
/-- The supremum of `x` and `xᶜ` is at least `⊤` -/
top_le_sup_compl : ∀ x : α, ⊤ ≤ x ⊔ xᶜ
/-- `⊤` is the greatest element -/
le_top : ∀ a : α, a ≤ ⊤
/-- `⊥` is the least element -/
bot_le : ∀ a : α, ⊥ ≤ a
/-- `x \ y` is equal to `x ⊓ yᶜ` -/
sdiff := fun x y => x ⊓ yᶜ
/-- `x ⇨ y` is equal to `y ⊔ xᶜ` -/
himp := fun x y => y ⊔ xᶜ
/-- `x \ y` is equal to `x ⊓ yᶜ` -/
sdiff_eq : ∀ x y : α, x \ y = x ⊓ yᶜ := by aesop
/-- `x ⇨ y` is equal to `y ⊔ xᶜ` -/
himp_eq : ∀ x y : α, x ⇨ y = y ⊔ xᶜ := by aesop
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BooleanAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [h : BooleanAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ h with }
-- See note [reducible non instances]
/-- A bounded generalized boolean algebra is a boolean algebra. -/
abbrev GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toBooleanAlgebra [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] [OrderTop α] :
BooleanAlgebra α where
__ := ‹GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α›
__ := GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toOrderBot
__ := ‹OrderTop α›
compl a := ⊤ \ a
inf_compl_le_bot _ := disjoint_sdiff_self_right.le_bot
top_le_sup_compl _ := le_sup_sdiff
sdiff_eq a b := by
change _ = a ⊓ (⊤ \ b)
rw [← inf_sdiff_assoc, inf_top_eq]
section BooleanAlgebra
variable [BooleanAlgebra α]
theorem inf_compl_eq_bot' : x ⊓ xᶜ = ⊥ :=
bot_unique <| BooleanAlgebra.inf_compl_le_bot x
@[simp]
theorem sup_compl_eq_top : x ⊔ xᶜ = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| BooleanAlgebra.top_le_sup_compl x
@[simp]
theorem compl_sup_eq_top : xᶜ ⊔ x = ⊤ := by rw [sup_comm, sup_compl_eq_top]
theorem isCompl_compl : IsCompl x xᶜ :=
IsCompl.of_eq inf_compl_eq_bot' sup_compl_eq_top
theorem sdiff_eq : x \ y = x ⊓ yᶜ :=
BooleanAlgebra.sdiff_eq x y
theorem himp_eq : x ⇨ y = y ⊔ xᶜ :=
BooleanAlgebra.himp_eq x y
instance (priority := 100) BooleanAlgebra.toComplementedLattice : ComplementedLattice α :=
⟨fun x => ⟨xᶜ, isCompl_compl⟩⟩
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BooleanAlgebra.toGeneralizedBooleanAlgebra :
GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α where
__ := ‹BooleanAlgebra α›
sup_inf_sdiff a b := by rw [sdiff_eq, ← inf_sup_left, sup_compl_eq_top, inf_top_eq]
inf_inf_sdiff a b := by
rw [sdiff_eq, ← inf_inf_distrib_left, inf_compl_eq_bot', inf_bot_eq]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BooleanAlgebra.toBiheytingAlgebra : BiheytingAlgebra α where
__ := ‹BooleanAlgebra α›
__ := GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
hnot := compl
le_himp_iff a b c := by rw [himp_eq, isCompl_compl.le_sup_right_iff_inf_left_le]
himp_bot _ := _root_.himp_eq.trans (bot_sup_eq _)
top_sdiff a := by rw [sdiff_eq, top_inf_eq]
@[simp]
theorem hnot_eq_compl : ￢x = xᶜ :=
rfl
/- NOTE: Is this theorem needed at all or can we use `top_sdiff'`. -/
theorem top_sdiff : ⊤ \ x = xᶜ :=
top_sdiff' x
theorem eq_compl_iff_isCompl : x = yᶜ ↔ IsCompl x y :=
⟨fun h => by
rw [h]
exact isCompl_compl.symm, IsCompl.eq_compl⟩
theorem compl_eq_iff_isCompl : xᶜ = y ↔ IsCompl x y :=
⟨fun h => by
rw [← h]
exact isCompl_compl, IsCompl.compl_eq⟩
theorem compl_eq_comm : xᶜ = y ↔ yᶜ = x := by
rw [eq_comm, compl_eq_iff_isCompl, eq_compl_iff_isCompl]
theorem eq_compl_comm : x = yᶜ ↔ y = xᶜ := by
rw [eq_comm, compl_eq_iff_isCompl, eq_compl_iff_isCompl]
@[simp]
theorem compl_compl (x : α) : xᶜᶜ = x :=
(@isCompl_compl _ x _).symm.compl_eq
theorem compl_comp_compl : compl ∘ compl = @id α :=
funext compl_compl
@[simp]
theorem compl_involutive : Function.Involutive (compl : α → α) :=
compl_compl
theorem compl_bijective : Function.Bijective (compl : α → α) :=
compl_involutive.bijective
theorem compl_surjective : Function.Surjective (compl : α → α) :=
compl_involutive.surjective
theorem compl_injective : Function.Injective (compl : α → α) :=
compl_involutive.injective
@[simp]
theorem compl_inj_iff : xᶜ = yᶜ ↔ x = y :=
compl_injective.eq_iff
theorem IsCompl.compl_eq_iff (h : IsCompl x y) : zᶜ = y ↔ z = x :=
h.compl_eq ▸ compl_inj_iff
@[simp]
theorem compl_eq_top : xᶜ = ⊤ ↔ x = ⊥ :=
isCompl_bot_top.compl_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem compl_eq_bot : xᶜ = ⊥ ↔ x = ⊤ :=
isCompl_top_bot.compl_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem compl_inf : (x ⊓ y)ᶜ = xᶜ ⊔ yᶜ :=
hnot_inf_distrib _ _
@[simp]
theorem compl_le_compl_iff_le : yᶜ ≤ xᶜ ↔ x ≤ y :=
⟨fun h => by have h := compl_le_compl h; simpa using h, compl_le_compl⟩
@[simp] lemma compl_lt_compl_iff_lt : yᶜ < xᶜ ↔ x < y :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le' compl_le_compl_iff_le compl_le_compl_iff_le
theorem compl_le_of_compl_le (h : yᶜ ≤ x) : xᶜ ≤ y := by
simpa only [compl_compl] using compl_le_compl h
theorem compl_le_iff_compl_le : xᶜ ≤ y ↔ yᶜ ≤ x :=
⟨compl_le_of_compl_le, compl_le_of_compl_le⟩
@[simp] theorem compl_le_self : xᶜ ≤ x ↔ x = ⊤ := by simpa using le_compl_self (a := xᶜ)
@[simp] theorem compl_lt_self [Nontrivial α] : xᶜ < x ↔ x = ⊤ := by
simpa using lt_compl_self (a := xᶜ)
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_compl : x \ yᶜ = x ⊓ y := by rw [sdiff_eq, compl_compl]
instance OrderDual.instBooleanAlgebra : BooleanAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
__ := instDistribLattice α
__ := instHeytingAlgebra
sdiff_eq _ _ := @himp_eq α _ _ _
himp_eq _ _ := @sdiff_eq α _ _ _
inf_compl_le_bot a := (@codisjoint_hnot_right _ _ (ofDual a)).top_le
top_le_sup_compl a := (@disjoint_compl_right _ _ (ofDual a)).le_bot
@[simp]
theorem sup_inf_inf_compl : x ⊓ y ⊔ x ⊓ yᶜ = x := by rw [← sdiff_eq, sup_inf_sdiff _ _]
theorem compl_sdiff : (x \ y)ᶜ = x ⇨ y := by
rw [sdiff_eq, himp_eq, compl_inf, compl_compl, sup_comm]
@[simp]
theorem compl_himp : (x ⇨ y)ᶜ = x \ y :=
@compl_sdiff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem compl_sdiff_compl : xᶜ \ yᶜ = y \ x := by rw [sdiff_compl, sdiff_eq, inf_comm]
@[simp]
theorem compl_himp_compl : xᶜ ⇨ yᶜ = y ⇨ x :=
@compl_sdiff_compl αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem disjoint_compl_left_iff : Disjoint xᶜ y ↔ y ≤ x := by
rw [← le_compl_iff_disjoint_left, compl_compl]
theorem disjoint_compl_right_iff : Disjoint x yᶜ ↔ x ≤ y := by
rw [← le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, compl_compl]
theorem codisjoint_himp_self_left : Codisjoint (x ⇨ y) x :=
@disjoint_sdiff_self_left αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem codisjoint_himp_self_right : Codisjoint x (x ⇨ y) :=
@disjoint_sdiff_self_right αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem himp_le : x ⇨ y ≤ z ↔ y ≤ z ∧ Codisjoint x z :=
(@le_sdiff αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _).trans <| and_congr_right' <| @codisjoint_comm _ (_) _ _ _
@[simp] lemma himp_le_left : x ⇨ y ≤ x ↔ x = ⊤ :=
⟨fun h ↦ codisjoint_self.1 <| codisjoint_himp_self_right.mono_right h, fun h ↦ le_top.trans h.ge⟩
@[simp] lemma himp_eq_left : x ⇨ y = x ↔ x = ⊤ ∧ y = ⊤ := by
rw [codisjoint_himp_self_left.eq_iff]; aesop
lemma himp_ne_right : x ⇨ y ≠ x ↔ x ≠ ⊤ ∨ y ≠ ⊤ := himp_eq_left.not.trans not_and_or
lemma codisjoint_iff_compl_le_left : Codisjoint x y ↔ yᶜ ≤ x :=
hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_left.symm
lemma codisjoint_iff_compl_le_right : Codisjoint x y ↔ xᶜ ≤ y :=
hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right.symm
end BooleanAlgebra
instance Prop.instBooleanAlgebra : BooleanAlgebra Prop where
__ := Prop.instHeytingAlgebra
__ := GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice
compl := Not
himp_eq _ _ := propext imp_iff_or_not
inf_compl_le_bot _ H := H.2 H.1
top_le_sup_compl p _ := Classical.em p
instance Prod.instBooleanAlgebra [BooleanAlgebra α] [BooleanAlgebra β] :
BooleanAlgebra (α × β) where
__ := instDistribLattice α β
__ := instHeytingAlgebra
himp_eq x y := by ext <;> simp [himp_eq]
sdiff_eq x y := by ext <;> simp [sdiff_eq]
inf_compl_le_bot x := by constructor <;> simp
top_le_sup_compl x := by constructor <;> simp
instance Pi.instBooleanAlgebra {ι : Type u} {α : ι → Type v} [∀ i, BooleanAlgebra (α i)] :
BooleanAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
__ := instDistribLattice
__ := instHeytingAlgebra
sdiff_eq _ _ := funext fun _ => sdiff_eq
himp_eq _ _ := funext fun _ => himp_eq
inf_compl_le_bot _ _ := BooleanAlgebra.inf_compl_le_bot _
top_le_sup_compl _ _ := BooleanAlgebra.top_le_sup_compl _
instance Bool.instBooleanAlgebra : BooleanAlgebra Bool where
__ := instBoundedOrder
compl := not
inf_compl_le_bot a := a.and_not_self.le
top_le_sup_compl a := a.or_not_self.ge
theorem Bool.sup_eq_bor : (· ⊔ ·) = or := by dsimp
theorem Bool.inf_eq_band : (· ⊓ ·) = and := by dsimp
@[simp]
theorem Bool.compl_eq_bnot : HasCompl.compl = not :=
rfl
section lift
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Pullback a `GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra` along an injection. -/
protected abbrev Function.Injective.generalizedBooleanAlgebra [Max α] [Min α] [Bot α] [SDiff α]
[GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra β] (f : α → β) (hf : Injective f)
(map_sup : ∀ a b, f (a ⊔ b) = f a ⊔ f b) (map_inf : ∀ a b, f (a ⊓ b) = f a ⊓ f b)
| (map_bot : f ⊥ = ⊥) (map_sdiff : ∀ a b, f (a \ b) = f a \ f b) :
GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α where
| Mathlib/Order/BooleanAlgebra.lean | 758 | 759 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.ZMod
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Cyclotomic.Roots
/-!
# Cyclotomic polynomials and `expand`.
We gather results relating cyclotomic polynomials and `expand`.
## Main results
* `Polynomial.cyclotomic_expand_eq_cyclotomic_mul` : If `p` is a prime such that `¬ p ∣ n`, then
`expand R p (cyclotomic n R) = (cyclotomic (n * p) R) * (cyclotomic n R)`.
* `Polynomial.cyclotomic_expand_eq_cyclotomic` : If `p` is a prime such that `p ∣ n`, then
`expand R p (cyclotomic n R) = cyclotomic (p * n) R`.
* `Polynomial.cyclotomic_mul_prime_eq_pow_of_not_dvd` : If `R` is of characteristic `p` and
`¬p ∣ n`, then `cyclotomic (n * p) R = (cyclotomic n R) ^ (p - 1)`.
* `Polynomial.cyclotomic_mul_prime_dvd_eq_pow` : If `R` is of characteristic `p` and `p ∣ n`, then
`cyclotomic (n * p) R = (cyclotomic n R) ^ p`.
* `Polynomial.cyclotomic_mul_prime_pow_eq` : If `R` is of characteristic `p` and `¬p ∣ m`, then
`cyclotomic (p ^ k * m) R = (cyclotomic m R) ^ (p ^ k - p ^ (k - 1))`.
-/
namespace Polynomial
/-- If `p` is a prime such that `¬ p ∣ n`, then
`expand R p (cyclotomic n R) = (cyclotomic (n * p) R) * (cyclotomic n R)`. -/
@[simp]
theorem cyclotomic_expand_eq_cyclotomic_mul {p n : ℕ} (hp : Nat.Prime p) (hdiv : ¬p ∣ n)
(R : Type*) [CommRing R] :
expand R p (cyclotomic n R) = cyclotomic (n * p) R * cyclotomic n R := by
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos n with (rfl | hnpos)
· simp
haveI := NeZero.of_pos hnpos
suffices expand ℤ p (cyclotomic n ℤ) = cyclotomic (n * p) ℤ * cyclotomic n ℤ by
rw [← map_cyclotomic_int, ← map_expand, this, Polynomial.map_mul, map_cyclotomic_int,
map_cyclotomic]
refine eq_of_monic_of_dvd_of_natDegree_le ((cyclotomic.monic _ ℤ).mul (cyclotomic.monic _ ℤ))
((cyclotomic.monic n ℤ).expand hp.pos) ?_ ?_
· refine (IsPrimitive.Int.dvd_iff_map_cast_dvd_map_cast _ _
(IsPrimitive.mul (cyclotomic.isPrimitive (n * p) ℤ) (cyclotomic.isPrimitive n ℤ))
((cyclotomic.monic n ℤ).expand hp.pos).isPrimitive).2 ?_
rw [Polynomial.map_mul, map_cyclotomic_int, map_cyclotomic_int, map_expand, map_cyclotomic_int]
refine IsCoprime.mul_dvd (cyclotomic.isCoprime_rat fun h => ?_) ?_ ?_
· replace h : n * p = n * 1 := by simp [h]
exact Nat.Prime.ne_one hp (mul_left_cancel₀ hnpos.ne' h)
· have hpos : 0 < n * p := mul_pos hnpos hp.pos
have hprim := Complex.isPrimitiveRoot_exp _ hpos.ne'
rw [cyclotomic_eq_minpoly_rat hprim hpos]
refine minpoly.dvd ℚ _ ?_
rw [aeval_def, ← eval_map, map_expand, map_cyclotomic, expand_eval, ← IsRoot.def,
@isRoot_cyclotomic_iff]
convert IsPrimitiveRoot.pow_of_dvd hprim hp.ne_zero (dvd_mul_left p n)
rw [Nat.mul_div_cancel _ (Nat.Prime.pos hp)]
· have hprim := Complex.isPrimitiveRoot_exp _ hnpos.ne.symm
rw [cyclotomic_eq_minpoly_rat hprim hnpos]
refine minpoly.dvd ℚ _ ?_
rw [aeval_def, ← eval_map, map_expand, expand_eval, ← IsRoot.def, ←
cyclotomic_eq_minpoly_rat hprim hnpos, map_cyclotomic, @isRoot_cyclotomic_iff]
exact IsPrimitiveRoot.pow_of_prime hprim hp hdiv
· rw [natDegree_expand, natDegree_cyclotomic,
natDegree_mul (cyclotomic_ne_zero _ ℤ) (cyclotomic_ne_zero _ ℤ), natDegree_cyclotomic,
natDegree_cyclotomic, mul_comm n,
Nat.totient_mul ((Nat.Prime.coprime_iff_not_dvd hp).2 hdiv), Nat.totient_prime hp,
mul_comm (p - 1), ← Nat.mul_succ, Nat.sub_one, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos hp.pos]
/-- If `p` is a prime such that `p ∣ n`, then
`expand R p (cyclotomic n R) = cyclotomic (p * n) R`. -/
@[simp]
theorem cyclotomic_expand_eq_cyclotomic {p n : ℕ} (hp : Nat.Prime p) (hdiv : p ∣ n) (R : Type*)
[CommRing R] : expand R p (cyclotomic n R) = cyclotomic (n * p) R := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hzero)
· simp
haveI := NeZero.of_pos hzero
suffices expand ℤ p (cyclotomic n ℤ) = cyclotomic (n * p) ℤ by
rw [← map_cyclotomic_int, ← map_expand, this, map_cyclotomic_int]
refine eq_of_monic_of_dvd_of_natDegree_le (cyclotomic.monic _ ℤ)
((cyclotomic.monic n ℤ).expand hp.pos) ?_ ?_
· have hpos := Nat.mul_pos hzero hp.pos
have hprim := Complex.isPrimitiveRoot_exp _ hpos.ne.symm
rw [cyclotomic_eq_minpoly hprim hpos]
refine minpoly.isIntegrallyClosed_dvd (hprim.isIntegral hpos) ?_
rw [aeval_def, ← eval_map, map_expand, map_cyclotomic, expand_eval, ← IsRoot.def,
@isRoot_cyclotomic_iff]
convert IsPrimitiveRoot.pow_of_dvd hprim hp.ne_zero (dvd_mul_left p n)
rw [Nat.mul_div_cancel _ hp.pos]
· rw [natDegree_expand, natDegree_cyclotomic, natDegree_cyclotomic, mul_comm n,
Nat.totient_mul_of_prime_of_dvd hp hdiv, mul_comm]
/-- If the `p ^ n`th cyclotomic polynomial is irreducible, so is the `p ^ m`th, for `m ≤ n`. -/
theorem cyclotomic_irreducible_pow_of_irreducible_pow {p : ℕ} (hp : Nat.Prime p) {R} [CommRing R]
[IsDomain R] {n m : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) (h : Irreducible (cyclotomic (p ^ n) R)) :
Irreducible (cyclotomic (p ^ m) R) := by
rcases m.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hm)
· simpa using irreducible_X_sub_C (1 : R)
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le hmn
induction' k with k hk
· simpa using h
have : m + k ≠ 0 := (add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg hm k.zero_le).ne'
rw [Nat.add_succ, pow_succ, ← cyclotomic_expand_eq_cyclotomic hp <| dvd_pow_self p this] at h
exact hk (by omega) (of_irreducible_expand hp.ne_zero h)
/-- If `Irreducible (cyclotomic (p ^ n) R)` then `Irreducible (cyclotomic p R).` -/
theorem cyclotomic_irreducible_of_irreducible_pow {p : ℕ} (hp : Nat.Prime p) {R} [CommRing R]
[IsDomain R] {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (h : Irreducible (cyclotomic (p ^ n) R)) :
Irreducible (cyclotomic p R) :=
pow_one p ▸ cyclotomic_irreducible_pow_of_irreducible_pow hp hn.bot_lt h
section CharP
/-- If `R` is of characteristic `p` and `¬p ∣ n`, then
`cyclotomic (n * p) R = (cyclotomic n R) ^ (p - 1)`. -/
theorem cyclotomic_mul_prime_eq_pow_of_not_dvd (R : Type*) {p n : ℕ} [hp : Fact (Nat.Prime p)]
[Ring R] [CharP R p] (hn : ¬p ∣ n) : cyclotomic (n * p) R = cyclotomic n R ^ (p - 1) := by
letI : Algebra (ZMod p) R := ZMod.algebra _ _
suffices cyclotomic (n * p) (ZMod p) = cyclotomic n (ZMod p) ^ (p - 1) by
rw [← map_cyclotomic _ (algebraMap (ZMod p) R), ← map_cyclotomic _ (algebraMap (ZMod p) R),
this, Polynomial.map_pow]
| apply mul_right_injective₀ (cyclotomic_ne_zero n <| ZMod p); dsimp
rw [← pow_succ', tsub_add_cancel_of_le hp.out.one_lt.le, mul_comm, ← ZMod.expand_card]
conv_rhs => rw [← map_cyclotomic_int]
rw [← map_expand, cyclotomic_expand_eq_cyclotomic_mul hp.out hn, Polynomial.map_mul,
map_cyclotomic, map_cyclotomic]
/-- If `R` is of characteristic `p` and `p ∣ n`, then
`cyclotomic (n * p) R = (cyclotomic n R) ^ p`. -/
theorem cyclotomic_mul_prime_dvd_eq_pow (R : Type*) {p n : ℕ} [hp : Fact (Nat.Prime p)] [Ring R]
[CharP R p] (hn : p ∣ n) : cyclotomic (n * p) R = cyclotomic n R ^ p := by
letI : Algebra (ZMod p) R := ZMod.algebra _ _
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Cyclotomic/Expand.lean | 124 | 134 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Ellen Arlt. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Ellen Arlt, Blair Shi, Sean Leather, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin, Lu-Ming Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Opposite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.RingEquiv
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Mul
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Pi
/-!
# Matrices
This file contains basic results on matrices including bundled versions of matrix operators.
## Implementation notes
For convenience, `Matrix m n α` is defined as `m → n → α`, as this allows elements of the matrix
to be accessed with `A i j`. However, it is not advisable to _construct_ matrices using terms of the
form `fun i j ↦ _` or even `(fun i j ↦ _ : Matrix m n α)`, as these are not recognized by Lean
as having the right type. Instead, `Matrix.of` should be used.
## TODO
Under various conditions, multiplication of infinite matrices makes sense.
These have not yet been implemented.
-/
assert_not_exists Star
universe u u' v w
variable {l m n o : Type*} {m' : o → Type*} {n' : o → Type*}
variable {R : Type*} {S : Type*} {α : Type v} {β : Type w} {γ : Type*}
namespace Matrix
instance decidableEq [DecidableEq α] [Fintype m] [Fintype n] : DecidableEq (Matrix m n α) :=
Fintype.decidablePiFintype
instance {n m} [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] (α) [Fintype α] :
Fintype (Matrix m n α) := inferInstanceAs (Fintype (m → n → α))
instance {n m} [Finite m] [Finite n] (α) [Finite α] :
Finite (Matrix m n α) := inferInstanceAs (Finite (m → n → α))
section
variable (R)
/-- This is `Matrix.of` bundled as a linear equivalence. -/
def ofLinearEquiv [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] : (m → n → α) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n α where
__ := ofAddEquiv
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_ofLinearEquiv [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
⇑(ofLinearEquiv _ : (m → n → α) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n α) = of := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_ofLinearEquiv_symm [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
⇑((ofLinearEquiv _).symm : Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] (m → n → α)) = of.symm := rfl
end
theorem sum_apply [AddCommMonoid α] (i : m) (j : n) (s : Finset β) (g : β → Matrix m n α) :
(∑ c ∈ s, g c) i j = ∑ c ∈ s, g c i j :=
(congr_fun (s.sum_apply i g) j).trans (s.sum_apply j _)
end Matrix
open Matrix
namespace Matrix
section Diagonal
variable [DecidableEq n]
variable (n α)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalAddMonoidHom [AddZeroClass α] : (n → α) →+ Matrix n n α where
toFun := diagonal
map_zero' := diagonal_zero
map_add' x y := (diagonal_add x y).symm
variable (R)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalLinearMap [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] : (n → α) →ₗ[R] Matrix n n α :=
{ diagonalAddMonoidHom n α with map_smul' := diagonal_smul }
variable {n α R}
section One
variable [Zero α] [One α]
lemma zero_le_one_elem [Preorder α] [ZeroLEOneClass α] (i j : n) :
0 ≤ (1 : Matrix n n α) i j := by
by_cases hi : i = j
· subst hi
simp
· simp [hi]
lemma zero_le_one_row [Preorder α] [ZeroLEOneClass α] (i : n) :
0 ≤ (1 : Matrix n n α) i :=
zero_le_one_elem i
end One
end Diagonal
section Diag
variable (n α)
/-- `Matrix.diag` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagAddMonoidHom [AddZeroClass α] : Matrix n n α →+ n → α where
toFun := diag
map_zero' := diag_zero
map_add' := diag_add
variable (R)
/-- `Matrix.diag` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def diagLinearMap [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] : Matrix n n α →ₗ[R] n → α :=
{ diagAddMonoidHom n α with map_smul' := diag_smul }
variable {n α R}
@[simp]
theorem diag_list_sum [AddMonoid α] (l : List (Matrix n n α)) : diag l.sum = (l.map diag).sum :=
map_list_sum (diagAddMonoidHom n α) l
@[simp]
theorem diag_multiset_sum [AddCommMonoid α] (s : Multiset (Matrix n n α)) :
diag s.sum = (s.map diag).sum :=
map_multiset_sum (diagAddMonoidHom n α) s
@[simp]
theorem diag_sum {ι} [AddCommMonoid α] (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Matrix n n α) :
diag (∑ i ∈ s, f i) = ∑ i ∈ s, diag (f i) :=
map_sum (diagAddMonoidHom n α) f s
end Diag
open Matrix
section AddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid α] [Mul α]
end AddCommMonoid
section NonAssocSemiring
variable [NonAssocSemiring α]
variable (α n)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as a `RingHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalRingHom [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] : (n → α) →+* Matrix n n α :=
{ diagonalAddMonoidHom n α with
toFun := diagonal
map_one' := diagonal_one
map_mul' := fun _ _ => (diagonal_mul_diagonal' _ _).symm }
end NonAssocSemiring
section Semiring
variable [Semiring α]
theorem diagonal_pow [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] (v : n → α) (k : ℕ) :
diagonal v ^ k = diagonal (v ^ k) :=
(map_pow (diagonalRingHom n α) v k).symm
/-- The ring homomorphism `α →+* Matrix n n α`
sending `a` to the diagonal matrix with `a` on the diagonal.
-/
def scalar (n : Type u) [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n] : α →+* Matrix n n α :=
(diagonalRingHom n α).comp <| Pi.constRingHom n α
section Scalar
variable [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n]
@[simp]
theorem scalar_apply (a : α) : scalar n a = diagonal fun _ => a :=
rfl
theorem scalar_inj [Nonempty n] {r s : α} : scalar n r = scalar n s ↔ r = s :=
(diagonal_injective.comp Function.const_injective).eq_iff
theorem scalar_commute_iff {r : α} {M : Matrix n n α} :
Commute (scalar n r) M ↔ r • M = MulOpposite.op r • M := by
simp_rw [Commute, SemiconjBy, scalar_apply, ← smul_eq_diagonal_mul, ← op_smul_eq_mul_diagonal]
theorem scalar_commute (r : α) (hr : ∀ r', Commute r r') (M : Matrix n n α) :
Commute (scalar n r) M := scalar_commute_iff.2 <| ext fun _ _ => hr _
end Scalar
end Semiring
section Algebra
variable [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n]
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring α] [Semiring β] [Algebra R α] [Algebra R β]
instance instAlgebra : Algebra R (Matrix n n α) where
algebraMap := (Matrix.scalar n).comp (algebraMap R α)
commutes' _ _ := scalar_commute _ (fun _ => Algebra.commutes _ _) _
smul_def' r x := by ext; simp [Matrix.scalar, Algebra.smul_def r]
theorem algebraMap_matrix_apply {r : R} {i j : n} :
algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) r i j = if i = j then algebraMap R α r else 0 := by
dsimp [algebraMap, Algebra.algebraMap, Matrix.scalar]
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h, Matrix.one_apply_ne]
theorem algebraMap_eq_diagonal (r : R) :
algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) r = diagonal (algebraMap R (n → α) r) := rfl
theorem algebraMap_eq_diagonalRingHom :
algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) = (diagonalRingHom n α).comp (algebraMap R _) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_algebraMap (r : R) (f : α → β) (hf : f 0 = 0)
(hf₂ : f (algebraMap R α r) = algebraMap R β r) :
(algebraMap R (Matrix n n α) r).map f = algebraMap R (Matrix n n β) r := by
rw [algebraMap_eq_diagonal, algebraMap_eq_diagonal, diagonal_map hf]
simp [hf₂]
variable (R)
/-- `Matrix.diagonal` as an `AlgHom`. -/
@[simps]
def diagonalAlgHom : (n → α) →ₐ[R] Matrix n n α :=
{ diagonalRingHom n α with
toFun := diagonal
commutes' := fun r => (algebraMap_eq_diagonal r).symm }
end Algebra
section AddHom
variable [Add α]
variable (R α) in
/-- Extracting entries from a matrix as an additive homomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def entryAddHom (i : m) (j : n) : AddHom (Matrix m n α) α where
toFun M := M i j
map_add' _ _ := rfl
-- It is necessary to spell out the name of the coercion explicitly on the RHS
-- for unification to succeed
lemma entryAddHom_eq_comp {i : m} {j : n} :
entryAddHom α i j =
((Pi.evalAddHom (fun _ => α) j).comp (Pi.evalAddHom _ i)).comp
(AddHomClass.toAddHom ofAddEquiv.symm) :=
rfl
end AddHom
section AddMonoidHom
variable [AddZeroClass α]
variable (R α) in
/--
Extracting entries from a matrix as an additive monoid homomorphism. Note this cannot be upgraded to
a ring homomorphism, as it does not respect multiplication.
-/
@[simps]
def entryAddMonoidHom (i : m) (j : n) : Matrix m n α →+ α where
toFun M := M i j
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_zero' := rfl
-- It is necessary to spell out the name of the coercion explicitly on the RHS
-- for unification to succeed
lemma entryAddMonoidHom_eq_comp {i : m} {j : n} :
entryAddMonoidHom α i j =
((Pi.evalAddMonoidHom (fun _ => α) j).comp (Pi.evalAddMonoidHom _ i)).comp
(AddMonoidHomClass.toAddMonoidHom ofAddEquiv.symm) := by
rfl
@[simp] lemma evalAddMonoidHom_comp_diagAddMonoidHom (i : m) :
(Pi.evalAddMonoidHom _ i).comp (diagAddMonoidHom m α) = entryAddMonoidHom α i i := by
simp [AddMonoidHom.ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma entryAddMonoidHom_toAddHom {i : m} {j : n} :
(entryAddMonoidHom α i j : AddHom _ _) = entryAddHom α i j := rfl
end AddMonoidHom
section LinearMap
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α]
variable (R α) in
/--
Extracting entries from a matrix as a linear map. Note this cannot be upgraded to an algebra
homomorphism, as it does not respect multiplication.
-/
@[simps]
def entryLinearMap (i : m) (j : n) :
Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] α where
toFun M := M i j
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
-- It is necessary to spell out the name of the coercion explicitly on the RHS
-- for unification to succeed
lemma entryLinearMap_eq_comp {i : m} {j : n} :
entryLinearMap R α i j =
LinearMap.proj j ∘ₗ LinearMap.proj i ∘ₗ (ofLinearEquiv R).symm.toLinearMap := by
rfl
@[simp] lemma proj_comp_diagLinearMap (i : m) :
LinearMap.proj i ∘ₗ diagLinearMap m R α = entryLinearMap R α i i := by
simp [LinearMap.ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_toAddMonoidHom {i : m} {j : n} :
(entryLinearMap R α i j : _ →+ _) = entryAddMonoidHom α i j := rfl
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_toAddHom {i : m} {j : n} :
(entryLinearMap R α i j : AddHom _ _) = entryAddHom α i j := rfl
end LinearMap
end Matrix
/-!
### Bundled versions of `Matrix.map`
-/
namespace Equiv
/-- The `Equiv` between spaces of matrices induced by an `Equiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `Equiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃ β) : Matrix m n α ≃ Matrix m n β where
toFun M := M.map f
invFun M := M.map f.symm
left_inv _ := Matrix.ext fun _ _ => f.symm_apply_apply _
right_inv _ := Matrix.ext fun _ _ => f.apply_symm_apply _
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (Equiv.refl α).mapMatrix = Equiv.refl (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃ β) : f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m n β ≃ _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃ β) (g : β ≃ γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α ≃ _) :=
rfl
end Equiv
namespace AddMonoidHom
variable [AddZeroClass α] [AddZeroClass β] [AddZeroClass γ]
/-- The `AddMonoidHom` between spaces of matrices induced by an `AddMonoidHom` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →+ β) : Matrix m n α →+ Matrix m n β where
toFun M := M.map f
map_zero' := Matrix.map_zero f f.map_zero
map_add' := Matrix.map_add f f.map_add
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : (AddMonoidHom.id α).mapMatrix = AddMonoidHom.id (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →+ γ) (g : α →+ β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α →+ _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryAddMonoidHom_comp_mapMatrix (f : α →+ β) (i : m) (j : n) :
(entryAddMonoidHom β i j).comp f.mapMatrix = f.comp (entryAddMonoidHom α i j) := rfl
end AddMonoidHom
namespace AddEquiv
variable [Add α] [Add β] [Add γ]
/-- The `AddEquiv` between spaces of matrices induced by an `AddEquiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AddEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃+ β) : Matrix m n α ≃+ Matrix m n β :=
{ f.toEquiv.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
invFun := fun M => M.map f.symm
map_add' := Matrix.map_add f (map_add f) }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (AddEquiv.refl α).mapMatrix = AddEquiv.refl (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃+ β) : f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m n β ≃+ _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃+ β) (g : β ≃+ γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α ≃+ _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryAddHom_comp_mapMatrix (f : α ≃+ β) (i : m) (j : n) :
(entryAddHom β i j).comp (AddHomClass.toAddHom f.mapMatrix) =
(f : AddHom α β).comp (entryAddHom _ i j) := rfl
end AddEquiv
namespace LinearMap
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [AddCommMonoid β] [AddCommMonoid γ]
variable [Module R α] [Module R β] [Module R γ]
/-- The `LinearMap` between spaces of matrices induced by a `LinearMap` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →ₗ[R] β) : Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] Matrix m n β where
toFun M := M.map f
map_add' := Matrix.map_add f f.map_add
map_smul' r := Matrix.map_smul f r (f.map_smul r)
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : LinearMap.id.mapMatrix = (LinearMap.id : Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →ₗ[R] γ) (g : α →ₗ[R] β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α →ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_comp_mapMatrix (f : α →ₗ[R] β) (i : m) (j : n) :
entryLinearMap R _ i j ∘ₗ f.mapMatrix = f ∘ₗ entryLinearMap R _ i j := rfl
end LinearMap
namespace LinearEquiv
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [AddCommMonoid β] [AddCommMonoid γ]
variable [Module R α] [Module R β] [Module R γ]
/-- The `LinearEquiv` between spaces of matrices induced by a `LinearEquiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as a `LinearEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) : Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n β :=
{ f.toEquiv.mapMatrix,
f.toLinearMap.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
invFun := fun M => M.map f.symm }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (LinearEquiv.refl R α).mapMatrix = LinearEquiv.refl R (Matrix m n α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) :
f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m n β ≃ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) (g : β ≃ₗ[R] γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma mapMatrix_toLinearMap (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) :
(f.mapMatrix : _ ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n β).toLinearMap = f.toLinearMap.mapMatrix := by
rfl
@[simp] lemma entryLinearMap_comp_mapMatrix (f : α ≃ₗ[R] β) (i : m) (j : n) :
entryLinearMap R _ i j ∘ₗ f.mapMatrix.toLinearMap =
f.toLinearMap ∘ₗ entryLinearMap R _ i j := by
simp only [mapMatrix_toLinearMap, LinearMap.entryLinearMap_comp_mapMatrix]
end LinearEquiv
namespace RingHom
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable [NonAssocSemiring α] [NonAssocSemiring β] [NonAssocSemiring γ]
/-- The `RingHom` between spaces of square matrices induced by a `RingHom` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as a `RingHom`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →+* β) : Matrix m m α →+* Matrix m m β :=
{ f.toAddMonoidHom.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
map_one' := by simp
map_mul' := fun _ _ => Matrix.map_mul }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : (RingHom.id α).mapMatrix = RingHom.id (Matrix m m α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →+* γ) (g : α →+* β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m m α →+* _) :=
rfl
end RingHom
namespace RingEquiv
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable [NonAssocSemiring α] [NonAssocSemiring β] [NonAssocSemiring γ]
/-- The `RingEquiv` between spaces of square matrices induced by a `RingEquiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as a `RingEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃+* β) : Matrix m m α ≃+* Matrix m m β :=
{ f.toRingHom.mapMatrix,
f.toAddEquiv.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
invFun := fun M => M.map f.symm }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : (RingEquiv.refl α).mapMatrix = RingEquiv.refl (Matrix m m α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃+* β) : f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m m β ≃+* _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃+* β) (g : β ≃+* γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m m α ≃+* _) :=
rfl
open MulOpposite in
/--
For any ring `R`, we have ring isomorphism `Matₙₓₙ(Rᵒᵖ) ≅ (Matₙₓₙ(R))ᵒᵖ` given by transpose.
-/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def mopMatrix : Matrix m m αᵐᵒᵖ ≃+* (Matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ where
toFun M := op (M.transpose.map unop)
invFun M := M.unop.transpose.map op
left_inv _ := by aesop
right_inv _ := by aesop
map_mul' _ _ := unop_injective <| by ext; simp [transpose, mul_apply]
map_add' _ _ := by aesop
end RingEquiv
namespace AlgHom
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring α] [Semiring β] [Semiring γ]
variable [Algebra R α] [Algebra R β] [Algebra R γ]
/-- The `AlgHom` between spaces of square matrices induced by an `AlgHom` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AlgHom`. -/
@[simps]
def mapMatrix (f : α →ₐ[R] β) : Matrix m m α →ₐ[R] Matrix m m β :=
{ f.toRingHom.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
commutes' := fun r => Matrix.map_algebraMap r f (map_zero _) (f.commutes r) }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_id : (AlgHom.id R α).mapMatrix = AlgHom.id R (Matrix m m α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_comp (f : β →ₐ[R] γ) (g : α →ₐ[R] β) :
f.mapMatrix.comp g.mapMatrix = ((f.comp g).mapMatrix : Matrix m m α →ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
end AlgHom
namespace AlgEquiv
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring α] [Semiring β] [Semiring γ]
variable [Algebra R α] [Algebra R β] [Algebra R γ]
/-- The `AlgEquiv` between spaces of square matrices induced by an `AlgEquiv` between their
coefficients. This is `Matrix.map` as an `AlgEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapMatrix (f : α ≃ₐ[R] β) : Matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] Matrix m m β :=
{ f.toAlgHom.mapMatrix,
f.toRingEquiv.mapMatrix with
toFun := fun M => M.map f
invFun := fun M => M.map f.symm }
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_refl : AlgEquiv.refl.mapMatrix = (AlgEquiv.refl : Matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_symm (f : α ≃ₐ[R] β) :
f.mapMatrix.symm = (f.symm.mapMatrix : Matrix m m β ≃ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mapMatrix_trans (f : α ≃ₐ[R] β) (g : β ≃ₐ[R] γ) :
f.mapMatrix.trans g.mapMatrix = ((f.trans g).mapMatrix : Matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] _) :=
rfl
/-- For any algebra `α` over a ring `R`, we have an `R`-algebra isomorphism
`Matₙₓₙ(αᵒᵖ) ≅ (Matₙₓₙ(R))ᵒᵖ` given by transpose. If `α` is commutative,
we can get rid of the `ᵒᵖ` in the left-hand side, see `Matrix.transposeAlgEquiv`. -/
@[simps!] def mopMatrix : Matrix m m αᵐᵒᵖ ≃ₐ[R] (Matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ where
__ := RingEquiv.mopMatrix
commutes' _ := MulOpposite.unop_injective <| by
ext; simp [algebraMap_matrix_apply, eq_comm, apply_ite MulOpposite.unop]
end AlgEquiv
open Matrix
namespace Matrix
section Transpose
open Matrix
variable (m n α)
/-- `Matrix.transpose` as an `AddEquiv` -/
@[simps apply]
def transposeAddEquiv [Add α] : Matrix m n α ≃+ Matrix n m α where
toFun := transpose
invFun := transpose
left_inv := transpose_transpose
right_inv := transpose_transpose
map_add' := transpose_add
@[simp]
theorem transposeAddEquiv_symm [Add α] : (transposeAddEquiv m n α).symm = transposeAddEquiv n m α :=
rfl
variable {m n α}
theorem transpose_list_sum [AddMonoid α] (l : List (Matrix m n α)) :
l.sumᵀ = (l.map transpose).sum :=
map_list_sum (transposeAddEquiv m n α) l
theorem transpose_multiset_sum [AddCommMonoid α] (s : Multiset (Matrix m n α)) :
s.sumᵀ = (s.map transpose).sum :=
(transposeAddEquiv m n α).toAddMonoidHom.map_multiset_sum s
theorem transpose_sum [AddCommMonoid α] {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (M : ι → Matrix m n α) :
(∑ i ∈ s, M i)ᵀ = ∑ i ∈ s, (M i)ᵀ :=
map_sum (transposeAddEquiv m n α) _ s
variable (m n R α)
/-- `Matrix.transpose` as a `LinearMap` -/
@[simps apply]
def transposeLinearEquiv [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
Matrix m n α ≃ₗ[R] Matrix n m α :=
{ transposeAddEquiv m n α with map_smul' := transpose_smul }
@[simp]
theorem transposeLinearEquiv_symm [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid α] [Module R α] :
(transposeLinearEquiv m n R α).symm = transposeLinearEquiv n m R α :=
rfl
variable {m n R α}
variable (m α)
/-- `Matrix.transpose` as a `RingEquiv` to the opposite ring -/
@[simps]
def transposeRingEquiv [AddCommMonoid α] [CommSemigroup α] [Fintype m] :
Matrix m m α ≃+* (Matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ (transposeAddEquiv m m α).trans MulOpposite.opAddEquiv with
toFun := fun M => MulOpposite.op Mᵀ
invFun := fun M => M.unopᵀ
map_mul' := fun M N =>
(congr_arg MulOpposite.op (transpose_mul M N)).trans (MulOpposite.op_mul _ _)
left_inv := fun M => transpose_transpose M
right_inv := fun M => MulOpposite.unop_injective <| transpose_transpose M.unop }
variable {m α}
@[simp]
theorem transpose_pow [CommSemiring α] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] (M : Matrix m m α) (k : ℕ) :
(M ^ k)ᵀ = Mᵀ ^ k :=
MulOpposite.op_injective <| map_pow (transposeRingEquiv m α) M k
theorem transpose_list_prod [CommSemiring α] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] (l : List (Matrix m m α)) :
l.prodᵀ = (l.map transpose).reverse.prod :=
(transposeRingEquiv m α).unop_map_list_prod l
variable (R m α)
/-- `Matrix.transpose` as an `AlgEquiv` to the opposite ring -/
@[simps]
def transposeAlgEquiv [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring α] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] [Algebra R α] :
Matrix m m α ≃ₐ[R] (Matrix m m α)ᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ (transposeAddEquiv m m α).trans MulOpposite.opAddEquiv,
transposeRingEquiv m α with
toFun := fun M => MulOpposite.op Mᵀ
commutes' := fun r => by
simp only [algebraMap_eq_diagonal, diagonal_transpose, MulOpposite.algebraMap_apply] }
variable {R m α}
end Transpose
end Matrix
| Mathlib/Data/Matrix/Basic.lean | 1,929 | 1,931 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Markus Himmel, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.ZeroMorphisms
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Kernels
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Abelian.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Subobject.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.Atoms
/-!
# Simple objects
We define simple objects in any category with zero morphisms.
A simple object is an object `Y` such that any monomorphism `f : X ⟶ Y`
is either an isomorphism or zero (but not both).
This is formalized as a `Prop` valued typeclass `Simple X`.
In some contexts, especially representation theory, simple objects are called "irreducibles".
If a morphism `f` out of a simple object is nonzero and has a kernel, then that kernel is zero.
(We state this as `kernel.ι f = 0`, but should add `kernel f ≅ 0`.)
When the category is abelian, being simple is the same as being cosimple (although we do not
state a separate typeclass for this).
As a consequence, any nonzero epimorphism out of a simple object is an isomorphism,
and any nonzero morphism into a simple object has trivial cokernel.
We show that any simple object is indecomposable.
-/
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace CategoryTheory
universe v u
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
section
variable [HasZeroMorphisms C]
/-- An object is simple if monomorphisms into it are (exclusively) either isomorphisms or zero. -/
class Simple (X : C) : Prop where
mono_isIso_iff_nonzero : ∀ {Y : C} (f : Y ⟶ X) [Mono f], IsIso f ↔ f ≠ 0
/-- A nonzero monomorphism to a simple object is an isomorphism. -/
theorem isIso_of_mono_of_nonzero {X Y : C} [Simple Y] {f : X ⟶ Y} [Mono f] (w : f ≠ 0) : IsIso f :=
(Simple.mono_isIso_iff_nonzero f).mpr w
theorem Simple.of_iso {X Y : C} [Simple Y] (i : X ≅ Y) : Simple X :=
{ mono_isIso_iff_nonzero := fun f m => by
constructor
· intro h w
have j : IsIso (f ≫ i.hom) := by infer_instance
rw [Simple.mono_isIso_iff_nonzero] at j
subst w
simp at j
· intro h
have j : IsIso (f ≫ i.hom) := by
apply isIso_of_mono_of_nonzero
intro w
apply h
simpa using (cancel_mono i.inv).2 w
rw [← Category.comp_id f, ← i.hom_inv_id, ← Category.assoc]
infer_instance }
theorem Simple.iff_of_iso {X Y : C} (i : X ≅ Y) : Simple X ↔ Simple Y :=
⟨fun _ => Simple.of_iso i.symm, fun _ => Simple.of_iso i⟩
theorem kernel_zero_of_nonzero_from_simple {X Y : C} [Simple X] {f : X ⟶ Y} [HasKernel f]
(w : f ≠ 0) : kernel.ι f = 0 := by
classical
by_contra h
haveI := isIso_of_mono_of_nonzero h
exact w (eq_zero_of_epi_kernel f)
-- See also `mono_of_nonzero_from_simple`, which requires `Preadditive C`.
/-- A nonzero morphism `f` to a simple object is an epimorphism
(assuming `f` has an image, and `C` has equalizers).
-/
theorem epi_of_nonzero_to_simple [HasEqualizers C] {X Y : C} [Simple Y] {f : X ⟶ Y} [HasImage f]
(w : f ≠ 0) : Epi f := by
rw [← image.fac f]
haveI : IsIso (image.ι f) := isIso_of_mono_of_nonzero fun h => w (eq_zero_of_image_eq_zero h)
apply epi_comp
theorem mono_to_simple_zero_of_not_iso {X Y : C} [Simple Y] {f : X ⟶ Y} [Mono f]
(w : IsIso f → False) : f = 0 := by
classical
by_contra h
exact w (isIso_of_mono_of_nonzero h)
theorem id_nonzero (X : C) [Simple.{v} X] : 𝟙 X ≠ 0 :=
(Simple.mono_isIso_iff_nonzero (𝟙 X)).mp (by infer_instance)
| instance (X : C) [Simple.{v} X] : Nontrivial (End X) :=
nontrivial_of_ne 1 _ (id_nonzero X)
section
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Simple.lean | 103 | 107 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.TwoDim
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Basic
/-!
# Oriented angles.
This file defines oriented angles in real inner product spaces.
## Main definitions
* `Orientation.oangle` is the oriented angle between two vectors with respect to an orientation.
## Implementation notes
The definitions here use the `Real.angle` type, angles modulo `2 * π`. For some purposes,
angles modulo `π` are more convenient, because results are true for such angles with less
configuration dependence. Results that are only equalities modulo `π` can be represented
modulo `2 * π` as equalities of `(2 : ℤ) • θ`.
## References
* Evan Chen, Euclidean Geometry in Mathematical Olympiads.
-/
noncomputable section
open Module Complex
open scoped Real RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
namespace Orientation
attribute [local instance] Complex.finrank_real_complex_fact
variable {V V' : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedAddCommGroup V']
variable [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V']
variable [Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Fact (finrank ℝ V' = 2)] (o : Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))
local notation "ω" => o.areaForm
/-- The oriented angle from `x` to `y`, modulo `2 * π`. If either vector is 0, this is 0.
See `InnerProductGeometry.angle` for the corresponding unoriented angle definition. -/
def oangle (x y : V) : Real.Angle :=
Complex.arg (o.kahler x y)
/-- Oriented angles are continuous when the vectors involved are nonzero. -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousAt_oangle {x : V × V} (hx1 : x.1 ≠ 0) (hx2 : x.2 ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : V × V => o.oangle y.1 y.2) x := by
refine (Complex.continuousAt_arg_coe_angle ?_).comp ?_
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx1 hx2
exact ((continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_inner).add
((continuous_ofReal.comp o.areaForm'.continuous₂).mul continuous_const)).continuousAt
/-- If the first vector passed to `oangle` is 0, the result is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_zero_left (x : V) : o.oangle 0 x = 0 := by simp [oangle]
/-- If the second vector passed to `oangle` is 0, the result is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_zero_right (x : V) : o.oangle x 0 = 0 := by simp [oangle]
/-- If the two vectors passed to `oangle` are the same, the result is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self (x : V) : o.oangle x x = 0 := by
rw [oangle, kahler_apply_self, ← ofReal_pow]
convert QuotientAddGroup.mk_zero (AddSubgroup.zmultiples (2 * π))
apply arg_ofReal_of_nonneg
positivity
/-- If the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
/-- If the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : y ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
/-- If the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : x ≠ y := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π`, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π`, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π`, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π / 2`, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π / 2`, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π / 2`, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `-π / 2`, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `-π / 2`, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `-π / 2`, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is positive, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is positive, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is positive, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is negative, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is negative, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is negative, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- Swapping the two vectors passed to `oangle` negates the angle. -/
theorem oangle_rev (x y : V) : o.oangle y x = -o.oangle x y := by
simp only [oangle, o.kahler_swap y x, Complex.arg_conj_coe_angle]
/-- Adding the angles between two vectors in each order results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev (x y : V) : o.oangle x y + o.oangle y x = 0 := by
simp [o.oangle_rev y x]
/-- Negating the first vector passed to `oangle` adds `π` to the angle. -/
theorem oangle_neg_left {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
o.oangle (-x) y = o.oangle x y + π := by
simp only [oangle, map_neg]
convert Complex.arg_neg_coe_angle _
exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
/-- Negating the second vector passed to `oangle` adds `π` to the angle. -/
theorem oangle_neg_right {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x (-y) = o.oangle x y + π := by
simp only [oangle, map_neg]
convert Complex.arg_neg_coe_angle _
exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
/-- Negating the first vector passed to `oangle` does not change twice the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_left (x y : V) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (-x) y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hy]
· simp [o.oangle_neg_left hx hy]
/-- Negating the second vector passed to `oangle` does not change twice the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_right (x y : V) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (-y) = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hy]
· simp [o.oangle_neg_right hx hy]
/-- Negating both vectors passed to `oangle` does not change the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_neg_neg (x y : V) : o.oangle (-x) (-y) = o.oangle x y := by simp [oangle]
/-- Negating the first vector produces the same angle as negating the second vector. -/
theorem oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right (x y : V) : o.oangle (-x) y = o.oangle x (-y) := by
rw [← neg_neg y, oangle_neg_neg, neg_neg]
/-- The angle between the negation of a nonzero vector and that vector is `π`. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_neg_self_left {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) : o.oangle (-x) x = π := by
simp [oangle_neg_left, hx]
/-- The angle between a nonzero vector and its negation is `π`. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_neg_self_right {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) : o.oangle x (-x) = π := by
simp [oangle_neg_right, hx]
/-- Twice the angle between the negation of a vector and that vector is 0. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_left (x : V) : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (-x) x = 0 := by
by_cases hx : x = 0 <;> simp [hx]
/-- Twice the angle between a vector and its negation is 0. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_right (x : V) : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (-x) = 0 := by
by_cases hx : x = 0 <;> simp [hx]
/-- Adding the angles between two vectors in each order, with the first vector in each angle
negated, results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_left (x y : V) : o.oangle (-x) y + o.oangle (-y) x = 0 := by
rw [oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right, oangle_rev, neg_add_cancel]
/-- Adding the angles between two vectors in each order, with the second vector in each angle
negated, results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_right (x y : V) : o.oangle x (-y) + o.oangle y (-x) = 0 := by
rw [o.oangle_rev (-x), oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right, add_neg_cancel]
/-- Multiplying the first vector passed to `oangle` by a positive real does not change the
angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_left_of_pos (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
o.oangle (r • x) y = o.oangle x y := by simp [oangle, Complex.arg_real_mul _ hr]
/-- Multiplying the second vector passed to `oangle` by a positive real does not change the
angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_right_of_pos (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
o.oangle x (r • y) = o.oangle x y := by simp [oangle, Complex.arg_real_mul _ hr]
/-- Multiplying the first vector passed to `oangle` by a negative real produces the same angle
as negating that vector. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_left_of_neg (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
o.oangle (r • x) y = o.oangle (-x) y := by
rw [← neg_neg r, neg_smul, ← smul_neg, o.oangle_smul_left_of_pos _ _ (neg_pos_of_neg hr)]
/-- Multiplying the second vector passed to `oangle` by a negative real produces the same angle
as negating that vector. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_right_of_neg (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
o.oangle x (r • y) = o.oangle x (-y) := by
rw [← neg_neg r, neg_smul, ← smul_neg, o.oangle_smul_right_of_pos _ _ (neg_pos_of_neg hr)]
/-- The angle between a nonnegative multiple of a vector and that vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_left_self_of_nonneg (x : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) : o.oangle (r • x) x = 0 := by
rcases hr.lt_or_eq with (h | h)
· simp [h]
· simp [h.symm]
/-- The angle between a vector and a nonnegative multiple of that vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_right_self_of_nonneg (x : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) : o.oangle x (r • x) = 0 := by
rcases hr.lt_or_eq with (h | h)
· simp [h]
· simp [h.symm]
/-- The angle between two nonnegative multiples of the same vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_smul_self_of_nonneg (x : V) {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (hr₁ : 0 ≤ r₁) (hr₂ : 0 ≤ r₂) :
o.oangle (r₁ • x) (r₂ • x) = 0 := by
rcases hr₁.lt_or_eq with (h | h)
· simp [h, hr₂]
· simp [h.symm]
/-- Multiplying the first vector passed to `oangle` by a nonzero real does not change twice the
angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_of_ne_zero (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (r • x) y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
rcases hr.lt_or_lt with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
/-- Multiplying the second vector passed to `oangle` by a nonzero real does not change twice the
angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_of_ne_zero (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (r • y) = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
rcases hr.lt_or_lt with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
/-- Twice the angle between a multiple of a vector and that vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_self (x : V) {r : ℝ} : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (r • x) x = 0 := by
rcases lt_or_le r 0 with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
/-- Twice the angle between a vector and a multiple of that vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_self (x : V) {r : ℝ} : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (r • x) = 0 := by
rcases lt_or_le r 0 with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
/-- Twice the angle between two multiples of a vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_smul_self (x : V) {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (r₁ • x) (r₂ • x) = 0 := by by_cases h : r₁ = 0 <;> simp [h]
/-- If the spans of two vectors are equal, twice angles with those vectors on the left are
equal. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_left_of_span_eq {x y : V} (z : V) (h : (ℝ ∙ x) = ℝ ∙ y) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x z = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle y z := by
rw [Submodule.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton] at h
rcases h with ⟨r, rfl⟩
exact (o.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_of_ne_zero _ _ (Units.ne_zero _)).symm
/-- If the spans of two vectors are equal, twice angles with those vectors on the right are
equal. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_right_of_span_eq (x : V) {y z : V} (h : (ℝ ∙ y) = ℝ ∙ z) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x z := by
rw [Submodule.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton] at h
rcases h with ⟨r, rfl⟩
exact (o.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_of_ne_zero _ _ (Units.ne_zero _)).symm
/-- If the spans of two pairs of vectors are equal, twice angles between those vectors are
equal. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_of_span_eq_of_span_eq {w x y z : V} (hwx : (ℝ ∙ w) = ℝ ∙ x)
(hyz : (ℝ ∙ y) = ℝ ∙ z) : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle w y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x z := by
rw [o.two_zsmul_oangle_left_of_span_eq y hwx, o.two_zsmul_oangle_right_of_span_eq x hyz]
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is zero if and only if the angle with the vectors
swapped is zero. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero {x y : V} : o.oangle x y = 0 ↔ o.oangle y x = 0 := by
rw [oangle_rev, neg_eq_zero]
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is zero if and only if they are on the same ray. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay {x y : V} : o.oangle x y = 0 ↔ SameRay ℝ x y := by
rw [oangle, kahler_apply_apply, Complex.arg_coe_angle_eq_iff_eq_toReal, Real.Angle.toReal_zero,
Complex.arg_eq_zero_iff]
simpa using o.nonneg_inner_and_areaForm_eq_zero_iff_sameRay x y
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is `π` if and only if the angle with the vectors
swapped is `π`. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi {x y : V} : o.oangle x y = π ↔ o.oangle y x = π := by
rw [oangle_rev, neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, Real.Angle.neg_coe_pi]
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is `π` if and only they are nonzero and the first is
on the same ray as the negation of the second. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y = π ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 ∧ SameRay ℝ x (-y) := by
rw [← o.oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay]
constructor
· intro h
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx, Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero.symm] at h
by_cases hy : y = 0; · simp [hy, Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero.symm] at h
refine ⟨hx, hy, ?_⟩
rw [o.oangle_neg_right hx hy, h, Real.Angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi]
· rintro ⟨hx, hy, h⟩
rwa [o.oangle_neg_right hx hy, ← Real.Angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi, sub_eq_zero] at h
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is zero or `π` if and only if those two vectors are
not linearly independent. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_not_linearIndependent {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y = 0 ∨ o.oangle x y = π ↔ ¬LinearIndependent ℝ ![x, y] := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay, oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg,
sameRay_or_ne_zero_and_sameRay_neg_iff_not_linearIndependent]
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is zero or `π` if and only if the first vector is zero
or the second is a multiple of the first. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_right_eq_smul {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y = 0 ∨ o.oangle x y = π ↔ x = 0 ∨ ∃ r : ℝ, y = r • x := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay, oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rcases h with (h | ⟨-, -, h⟩)
· by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
obtain ⟨r, -, rfl⟩ := h.exists_nonneg_left hx
exact Or.inr ⟨r, rfl⟩
· by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
obtain ⟨r, -, hy⟩ := h.exists_nonneg_left hx
refine Or.inr ⟨-r, ?_⟩
simp [hy]
· rcases h with (rfl | ⟨r, rfl⟩); · simp
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
rcases lt_trichotomy r 0 with (hr | hr | hr)
· rw [← neg_smul]
exact Or.inr ⟨hx, smul_ne_zero hr.ne hx,
SameRay.sameRay_pos_smul_right x (Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hr)⟩
· simp [hr]
· exact Or.inl (SameRay.sameRay_pos_smul_right x hr)
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is not zero or `π` if and only if those two vectors
are linearly independent. -/
theorem oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_linearIndependent {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y ≠ 0 ∧ o.oangle x y ≠ π ↔ LinearIndependent ℝ ![x, y] := by
rw [← not_or, ← not_iff_not, Classical.not_not,
oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_not_linearIndependent]
/-- Two vectors are equal if and only if they have equal norms and zero angle between them. -/
theorem eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero (x y : V) : x = y ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ ∧ o.oangle x y = 0 := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay]
constructor
· rintro rfl
simp; rfl
· rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with (rfl | hy)
· simp
rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
obtain ⟨r, hr, rfl⟩ := h₂.exists_nonneg_right hy
have : ‖y‖ ≠ 0 := by simpa using hy
obtain rfl : r = 1 := by
apply mul_right_cancel₀ this
simpa [norm_smul, abs_of_nonneg hr] using h₁
simp
/-- Two vectors with equal norms are equal if and only if they have zero angle between them. -/
theorem eq_iff_oangle_eq_zero_of_norm_eq {x y : V} (h : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) : x = y ↔ o.oangle x y = 0 :=
⟨fun he => ((o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).1 he).2, fun ha =>
(o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).2 ⟨h, ha⟩⟩
/-- Two vectors with zero angle between them are equal if and only if they have equal norms. -/
theorem eq_iff_norm_eq_of_oangle_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = 0) : x = y ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ :=
⟨fun he => ((o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).1 he).1, fun hn =>
(o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).2 ⟨hn, h⟩⟩
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, the angle between the first and the second plus the angle
between the second and the third equals the angle between the first and the third. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x y + o.oangle y z = o.oangle x z := by
simp_rw [oangle]
rw [← Complex.arg_mul_coe_angle, o.kahler_mul y x z]
· congr 1
exact mod_cast Complex.arg_real_mul _ (by positivity : 0 < ‖y‖ ^ 2)
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hy hz
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, the angle between the second and the third plus the angle
between the first and the second equals the angle between the first and the third. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_swap {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle y z + o.oangle x y = o.oangle x z := by rw [add_comm, o.oangle_add hx hy hz]
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, the angle between the first and the third minus the angle
between the first and the second equals the angle between the second and the third. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sub_left {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x z - o.oangle x y = o.oangle y z := by
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add, o.oangle_add_swap hx hy hz]
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, the angle between the first and the third minus the angle
between the second and the third equals the angle between the first and the second. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sub_right {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x z - o.oangle y z = o.oangle x y := by rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add, o.oangle_add hx hy hz]
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, adding the angles between them in cyclic order results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_cyc3 {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x y + o.oangle y z + o.oangle z x = 0 := by simp [hx, hy, hz]
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, adding the angles between them in cyclic order, with the first
vector in each angle negated, results in π. If the vectors add to 0, this is a version of the
sum of the angles of a triangle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_cyc3_neg_left {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle (-x) y + o.oangle (-y) z + o.oangle (-z) x = π := by
rw [o.oangle_neg_left hx hy, o.oangle_neg_left hy hz, o.oangle_neg_left hz hx,
show o.oangle x y + π + (o.oangle y z + π) + (o.oangle z x + π) =
o.oangle x y + o.oangle y z + o.oangle z x + (π + π + π : Real.Angle) by abel,
o.oangle_add_cyc3 hx hy hz, Real.Angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi, zero_add, zero_add]
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, adding the angles between them in cyclic order, with the second
vector in each angle negated, results in π. If the vectors add to 0, this is a version of the
sum of the angles of a triangle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_cyc3_neg_right {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x (-y) + o.oangle y (-z) + o.oangle z (-x) = π := by
simp_rw [← oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right, o.oangle_add_cyc3_neg_left hx hy hz]
/-- Pons asinorum, oriented vector angle form. -/
theorem oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq {x y : V} (h : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) :
o.oangle x (x - y) = o.oangle (y - x) y := by simp [oangle, h]
/-- The angle at the apex of an isosceles triangle is `π` minus twice a base angle, oriented
vector angle form. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq {x y : V} (hn : x ≠ y) (h : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) :
o.oangle y x = π - (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (y - x) y := by
rw [two_zsmul]
nth_rw 1 [← o.oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq h]
rw [eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← oangle_neg_neg, ← add_assoc]
have hy : y ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
rw [norm_zero, norm_eq_zero] at h
exact hn h
have hx : x ≠ 0 := norm_ne_zero_iff.1 (h.symm ▸ norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hy)
convert o.oangle_add_cyc3_neg_right (neg_ne_zero.2 hy) hx (sub_ne_zero_of_ne hn.symm) using 1
simp
/-- The angle between two vectors, with respect to an orientation given by `Orientation.map`
with a linear isometric equivalence, equals the angle between those two vectors, transformed by
the inverse of that equivalence, with respect to the original orientation. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_map (x y : V') (f : V ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] V') :
(Orientation.map (Fin 2) f.toLinearEquiv o).oangle x y = o.oangle (f.symm x) (f.symm y) := by
simp [oangle, o.kahler_map]
@[simp]
protected theorem _root_.Complex.oangle (w z : ℂ) :
Complex.orientation.oangle w z = Complex.arg (conj w * z) := by
simp [oangle, mul_comm z]
/-- The oriented angle on an oriented real inner product space of dimension 2 can be evaluated in
terms of a complex-number representation of the space. -/
theorem oangle_map_complex (f : V ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] ℂ)
(hf : Orientation.map (Fin 2) f.toLinearEquiv o = Complex.orientation) (x y : V) :
o.oangle x y = Complex.arg (conj (f x) * f y) := by
rw [← Complex.oangle, ← hf, o.oangle_map]
iterate 2 rw [LinearIsometryEquiv.symm_apply_apply]
/-- Negating the orientation negates the value of `oangle`. -/
theorem oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg (x y : V) : (-o).oangle x y = -o.oangle x y := by
simp [oangle]
/-- The inner product of two vectors is the product of the norms and the cosine of the oriented
angle between the vectors. -/
theorem inner_eq_norm_mul_norm_mul_cos_oangle (x y : V) :
⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ * Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x y) := by
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
by_cases hy : y = 0; · simp [hy]
rw [oangle, Real.Angle.cos_coe, Complex.cos_arg, o.norm_kahler]
· simp only [kahler_apply_apply, real_smul, add_re, ofReal_re, mul_re, I_re, ofReal_im]
field_simp
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
/-- The cosine of the oriented angle between two nonzero vectors is the inner product divided by
the product of the norms. -/
theorem cos_oangle_eq_inner_div_norm_mul_norm {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x y) = ⟪x, y⟫ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) := by
rw [o.inner_eq_norm_mul_norm_mul_cos_oangle]
field_simp [norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx, norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hy]
/-- The cosine of the oriented angle between two nonzero vectors equals that of the unoriented
angle. -/
theorem cos_oangle_eq_cos_angle {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x y) = Real.cos (InnerProductGeometry.angle x y) := by
rw [o.cos_oangle_eq_inner_div_norm_mul_norm hx hy, InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle]
/-- The oriented angle between two nonzero vectors is plus or minus the unoriented angle. -/
theorem oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x y = InnerProductGeometry.angle x y ∨
o.oangle x y = -InnerProductGeometry.angle x y :=
Real.Angle.cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg.1 <| o.cos_oangle_eq_cos_angle hx hy
/-- The unoriented angle between two nonzero vectors is the absolute value of the oriented angle,
converted to a real. -/
theorem angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
InnerProductGeometry.angle x y = |(o.oangle x y).toReal| := by
have h0 := InnerProductGeometry.angle_nonneg x y
have hpi := InnerProductGeometry.angle_le_pi x y
rcases o.oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle hx hy with (h | h)
· rw [h, eq_comm, Real.Angle.abs_toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨h0, hpi⟩
· rw [h, eq_comm, Real.Angle.abs_toReal_neg_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨h0, hpi⟩
/-- If the sign of the oriented angle between two vectors is zero, either one of the vectors is
zero or the unoriented angle is 0 or π. -/
theorem eq_zero_or_angle_eq_zero_or_pi_of_sign_oangle_eq_zero {x y : V}
(h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 0) :
x = 0 ∨ y = 0 ∨ InnerProductGeometry.angle x y = 0 ∨ InnerProductGeometry.angle x y = π := by
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
by_cases hy : y = 0; · simp [hy]
rw [o.angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal hx hy]
rw [Real.Angle.sign_eq_zero_iff] at h
rcases h with (h | h) <;> simp [h, Real.pi_pos.le]
/-- If two unoriented angles are equal, and the signs of the corresponding oriented angles are
equal, then the oriented angles are equal (even in degenerate cases). -/
theorem oangle_eq_of_angle_eq_of_sign_eq {w x y z : V}
(h : InnerProductGeometry.angle w x = InnerProductGeometry.angle y z)
(hs : (o.oangle w x).sign = (o.oangle y z).sign) : o.oangle w x = o.oangle y z := by
by_cases h0 : (w = 0 ∨ x = 0) ∨ y = 0 ∨ z = 0
| · have hs' : (o.oangle w x).sign = 0 ∧ (o.oangle y z).sign = 0 := by
rcases h0 with ((rfl | rfl) | rfl | rfl)
· simpa using hs.symm
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/Basic.lean | 596 | 598 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.IsManifold.ExtChartAt
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.LocalInvariantProperties
/-!
# `C^n` functions between manifolds
We define `Cⁿ` functions between manifolds, as functions which are `Cⁿ` in charts, and prove
basic properties of these notions. Here, `n` can be finite, or `∞`, or `ω`.
## Main definitions and statements
Let `M` and `M'` be two manifolds, with respect to models with corners `I` and `I'`. Let
`f : M → M'`.
* `ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x` states that the function `f` is `Cⁿ` within the set `s`
around the point `x`.
* `ContMDiffAt I I' n f x` states that the function `f` is `Cⁿ` around `x`.
* `ContMDiffOn I I' n f s` states that the function `f` is `Cⁿ` on the set `s`
* `ContMDiff I I' n f` states that the function `f` is `Cⁿ`.
We also give some basic properties of `Cⁿ` functions between manifolds, following the API of
`C^n` functions between vector spaces.
See `Basic.lean` for further basic properties of `Cⁿ` functions between manifolds,
`NormedSpace.lean` for the equivalence of manifold-smoothness to usual smoothness,
`Product.lean` for smoothness results related to the product of manifolds and
`Atlas.lean` for smoothness of atlas members and local structomorphisms.
## Implementation details
Many properties follow for free from the corresponding properties of functions in vector spaces,
as being `Cⁿ` is a local property invariant under the `Cⁿ` groupoid. We take advantage of the
general machinery developed in `LocalInvariantProperties.lean` to get these properties
automatically. For instance, the fact that being `Cⁿ` does not depend on the chart one considers
is given by `liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart`.
For this to work, the definition of `ContMDiffWithinAt` and friends has to
follow definitionally the setup of local invariant properties. Still, we recast the definition
in terms of extended charts in `contMDiffOn_iff` and `contMDiff_iff`.
-/
open Set Function Filter ChartedSpace IsManifold
open scoped Topology Manifold ContDiff
/-! ### Definition of `Cⁿ` functions between manifolds -/
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
-- Prerequisite typeclasses to say that `M` is a manifold over the pair `(E, H)`
{E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
{I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H} {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
-- Prerequisite typeclasses to say that `M'` is a manifold over the pair `(E', H')`
{E' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H']
{I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'} {M' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M'] [ChartedSpace H' M']
-- Prerequisite typeclasses to say that `M''` is a manifold over the pair `(E'', H'')`
{E'' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E''] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E''] {H'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H'']
{I'' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E'' H''} {M'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M''] [ChartedSpace H'' M'']
-- declare functions, sets, points and smoothness indices
{e : PartialHomeomorph M H}
{e' : PartialHomeomorph M' H'} {f f₁ : M → M'} {s s₁ t : Set M} {x : M} {m n : WithTop ℕ∞}
variable (I I') in
/-- Property in the model space of a model with corners of being `C^n` within at set at a point,
when read in the model vector space. This property will be lifted to manifolds to define `C^n`
functions between manifolds. -/
def ContDiffWithinAtProp (n : WithTop ℕ∞) (f : H → H') (s : Set H) (x : H) : Prop :=
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (I' ∘ f ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (I x)
theorem contDiffWithinAtProp_self_source {f : E → H'} {s : Set E} {x : E} :
ContDiffWithinAtProp 𝓘(𝕜, E) I' n f s x ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (I' ∘ f) s x := by
simp_rw [ContDiffWithinAtProp, modelWithCornersSelf_coe, range_id, inter_univ,
modelWithCornersSelf_coe_symm, CompTriple.comp_eq, preimage_id_eq, id_eq]
theorem contDiffWithinAtProp_self {f : E → E'} {s : Set E} {x : E} :
ContDiffWithinAtProp 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') n f s x ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x :=
contDiffWithinAtProp_self_source
theorem contDiffWithinAtProp_self_target {f : H → E'} {s : Set H} {x : H} :
ContDiffWithinAtProp I 𝓘(𝕜, E') n f s x ↔
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (f ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (I x) :=
Iff.rfl
/-- Being `Cⁿ` in the model space is a local property, invariant under `Cⁿ` maps. Therefore,
it lifts nicely to manifolds. -/
theorem contDiffWithinAt_localInvariantProp_of_le (n m : WithTop ℕ∞) (hmn : m ≤ n) :
(contDiffGroupoid n I).LocalInvariantProp (contDiffGroupoid n I')
(ContDiffWithinAtProp I I' m) where
is_local {s x u f} u_open xu := by
have : I.symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ u) ∩ range I = I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I ∩ I.symm ⁻¹' u := by
simp only [inter_right_comm, preimage_inter]
rw [ContDiffWithinAtProp, ContDiffWithinAtProp, this]
symm
apply contDiffWithinAt_inter
have : u ∈ 𝓝 (I.symm (I x)) := by
rw [ModelWithCorners.left_inv]
exact u_open.mem_nhds xu
apply ContinuousAt.preimage_mem_nhds I.continuous_symm.continuousAt this
right_invariance' {s x f e} he hx h := by
rw [ContDiffWithinAtProp] at h ⊢
have : I x = (I ∘ e.symm ∘ I.symm) (I (e x)) := by simp only [hx, mfld_simps]
rw [this] at h
have : I (e x) ∈ I.symm ⁻¹' e.target ∩ range I := by simp only [hx, mfld_simps]
have := (mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid.2 he).2.contDiffWithinAt this
convert (h.comp_inter _ (this.of_le hmn)).mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin _
using 1
· ext y; simp only [mfld_simps]
refine mem_nhdsWithin.mpr
⟨I.symm ⁻¹' e.target, e.open_target.preimage I.continuous_symm, by
simp_rw [mem_preimage, I.left_inv, e.mapsTo hx], ?_⟩
mfld_set_tac
congr_of_forall {s x f g} h hx hf := by
apply hf.congr
· intro y hy
simp only [mfld_simps] at hy
simp only [h, hy, mfld_simps]
· simp only [hx, mfld_simps]
left_invariance' {s x f e'} he' hs hx h := by
rw [ContDiffWithinAtProp] at h ⊢
have A : (I' ∘ f ∘ I.symm) (I x) ∈ I'.symm ⁻¹' e'.source ∩ range I' := by
simp only [hx, mfld_simps]
have := (mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid.2 he').1.contDiffWithinAt A
convert (this.of_le hmn).comp _ h _
· ext y; simp only [mfld_simps]
· intro y hy; simp only [mfld_simps] at hy; simpa only [hy, mfld_simps] using hs hy.1
/-- Being `Cⁿ` in the model space is a local property, invariant under `C^n` maps. Therefore,
it lifts nicely to manifolds. -/
theorem contDiffWithinAt_localInvariantProp (n : WithTop ℕ∞) :
(contDiffGroupoid n I).LocalInvariantProp (contDiffGroupoid n I')
(ContDiffWithinAtProp I I' n) :=
contDiffWithinAt_localInvariantProp_of_le n n le_rfl
theorem contDiffWithinAtProp_mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
(n : WithTop ℕ∞) ⦃s x t⦄ ⦃f : H → H'⦄ (hts : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x)
(h : ContDiffWithinAtProp I I' n f s x) : ContDiffWithinAtProp I I' n f t x := by
refine h.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin ?_
refine inter_mem ?_ (mem_of_superset self_mem_nhdsWithin inter_subset_right)
rwa [← Filter.mem_map, ← I.image_eq, I.symm_map_nhdsWithin_image]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")]
alias contDiffWithinAtProp_mono_of_mem := contDiffWithinAtProp_mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem contDiffWithinAtProp_id (x : H) : ContDiffWithinAtProp I I n id univ x := by
simp only [ContDiffWithinAtProp, id_comp, preimage_univ, univ_inter]
have : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n id (range I) (I x) := contDiff_id.contDiffAt.contDiffWithinAt
refine this.congr (fun y hy => ?_) ?_
· simp only [ModelWithCorners.right_inv I hy, mfld_simps]
· simp only [mfld_simps]
variable (I I') in
/-- A function is `n` times continuously differentiable within a set at a point in a manifold if
it is continuous and it is `n` times continuously differentiable in this set around this point, when
read in the preferred chart at this point. -/
def ContMDiffWithinAt (n : WithTop ℕ∞) (f : M → M') (s : Set M) (x : M) :=
| LiftPropWithinAt (ContDiffWithinAtProp I I' n) f s x
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")] alias SmoothWithinAt := ContMDiffWithinAt
variable (I I') in
/-- A function is `n` times continuously differentiable at a point in a manifold if
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/ContMDiff/Defs.lean | 164 | 169 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Chris Hughes, Daniel Weber
-/
import Batteries.Data.Nat.Gcd
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Associated
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Divisibility.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Basic
/-!
# Multiplicity of a divisor
For a commutative monoid, this file introduces the notion of multiplicity of a divisor and proves
several basic results on it.
## Main definitions
* `emultiplicity a b`: for two elements `a` and `b` of a commutative monoid returns the largest
number `n` such that `a ^ n ∣ b` or infinity, written `⊤`, if `a ^ n ∣ b` for all natural numbers
`n`.
* `multiplicity a b`: a `ℕ`-valued version of `multiplicity`, defaulting for `1` instead of `⊤`.
The reason for using `1` as a default value instead of `0` is to have `multiplicity_eq_zero_iff`.
* `FiniteMultiplicity a b`: a predicate denoting that the multiplicity of `a` in `b` is finite.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
variable {α β : Type*}
open Nat
/-- `multiplicity.Finite a b` indicates that the multiplicity of `a` in `b` is finite. -/
abbrev FiniteMultiplicity [Monoid α] (a b : α) : Prop :=
∃ n : ℕ, ¬a ^ (n + 1) ∣ b
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")] alias multiplicity.Finite := FiniteMultiplicity
open scoped Classical in
/-- `emultiplicity a b` returns the largest natural number `n` such that
`a ^ n ∣ b`, as an `ℕ∞`. If `∀ n, a ^ n ∣ b` then it returns `⊤`. -/
noncomputable def emultiplicity [Monoid α] (a b : α) : ℕ∞ :=
if h : FiniteMultiplicity a b then Nat.find h else ⊤
/-- A `ℕ`-valued version of `emultiplicity`, returning `1` instead of `⊤`. -/
noncomputable def multiplicity [Monoid α] (a b : α) : ℕ :=
(emultiplicity a b).untopD 1
section Monoid
variable [Monoid α] [Monoid β] {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem emultiplicity_eq_top :
emultiplicity a b = ⊤ ↔ ¬FiniteMultiplicity a b := by
simp [emultiplicity]
theorem emultiplicity_lt_top {a b : α} : emultiplicity a b < ⊤ ↔ FiniteMultiplicity a b := by
simp [lt_top_iff_ne_top, emultiplicity_eq_top]
theorem finiteMultiplicity_iff_emultiplicity_ne_top :
FiniteMultiplicity a b ↔ emultiplicity a b ≠ ⊤ := by simp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias finite_iff_emultiplicity_ne_top := finiteMultiplicity_iff_emultiplicity_ne_top
alias ⟨FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_ne_top, _⟩ := finite_iff_emultiplicity_ne_top
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.emultiplicity_ne_top := FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_ne_top
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-08")]
alias Finite.emultiplicity_ne_top := FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_ne_top
theorem finiteMultiplicity_of_emultiplicity_eq_natCast {n : ℕ} (h : emultiplicity a b = n) :
FiniteMultiplicity a b := by
by_contra! nh
rw [← emultiplicity_eq_top, h] at nh
trivial
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias finite_of_emultiplicity_eq_natCast := finiteMultiplicity_of_emultiplicity_eq_natCast
theorem multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq_some {n : ℕ} (h : emultiplicity a b = n) :
multiplicity a b = n := by
simp [multiplicity, h]
rfl
theorem emultiplicity_ne_of_multiplicity_ne {n : ℕ} :
multiplicity a b ≠ n → emultiplicity a b ≠ n :=
mt multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq_some
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity (h : FiniteMultiplicity a b) :
emultiplicity a b = multiplicity a b := by
cases hm : emultiplicity a b
· simp [h] at hm
rw [multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq_some hm]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity :=
FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_eq_iff_multiplicity_eq {n : ℕ}
(h : FiniteMultiplicity a b) : emultiplicity a b = n ↔ multiplicity a b = n := by
simp [h.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.emultiplicity_eq_iff_multiplicity_eq :=
FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_eq_iff_multiplicity_eq
theorem emultiplicity_eq_iff_multiplicity_eq_of_ne_one {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 1) :
emultiplicity a b = n ↔ multiplicity a b = n := by
constructor
· exact multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq_some
· intro h₂
simpa [multiplicity, WithTop.untopD_eq_iff, h] using h₂
theorem emultiplicity_eq_zero_iff_multiplicity_eq_zero :
emultiplicity a b = 0 ↔ multiplicity a b = 0 :=
emultiplicity_eq_iff_multiplicity_eq_of_ne_one zero_ne_one
@[simp]
theorem multiplicity_eq_one_of_not_finiteMultiplicity (h : ¬FiniteMultiplicity a b) :
multiplicity a b = 1 := by
simp [multiplicity, emultiplicity_eq_top.2 h]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity_eq_one_of_not_finite :=
multiplicity_eq_one_of_not_finiteMultiplicity
@[simp]
theorem multiplicity_le_emultiplicity :
multiplicity a b ≤ emultiplicity a b := by
by_cases hf : FiniteMultiplicity a b
· simp [hf.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity]
· simp [hf, emultiplicity_eq_top.2]
@[simp]
theorem multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq {c d : β}
(h : emultiplicity a b = emultiplicity c d) : multiplicity a b = multiplicity c d := by
unfold multiplicity
rw [h]
theorem multiplicity_le_of_emultiplicity_le {n : ℕ} (h : emultiplicity a b ≤ n) :
multiplicity a b ≤ n := by
exact_mod_cast multiplicity_le_emultiplicity.trans h
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_le_of_multiplicity_le (hfin : FiniteMultiplicity a b)
{n : ℕ} (h : multiplicity a b ≤ n) : emultiplicity a b ≤ n := by
rw [emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity hfin]
assumption_mod_cast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.emultiplicity_le_of_multiplicity_le :=
FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_le_of_multiplicity_le
theorem le_emultiplicity_of_le_multiplicity {n : ℕ} (h : n ≤ multiplicity a b) :
n ≤ emultiplicity a b := by
exact_mod_cast (WithTop.coe_mono h).trans multiplicity_le_emultiplicity
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.le_multiplicity_of_le_emultiplicity (hfin : FiniteMultiplicity a b)
{n : ℕ} (h : n ≤ emultiplicity a b) : n ≤ multiplicity a b := by
rw [emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity hfin] at h
assumption_mod_cast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.le_multiplicity_of_le_emultiplicity :=
FiniteMultiplicity.le_multiplicity_of_le_emultiplicity
theorem multiplicity_lt_of_emultiplicity_lt {n : ℕ} (h : emultiplicity a b < n) :
multiplicity a b < n := by
exact_mod_cast multiplicity_le_emultiplicity.trans_lt h
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_lt_of_multiplicity_lt (hfin : FiniteMultiplicity a b)
{n : ℕ} (h : multiplicity a b < n) : emultiplicity a b < n := by
rw [emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity hfin]
assumption_mod_cast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.emultiplicity_lt_of_multiplicity_lt :=
FiniteMultiplicity.emultiplicity_lt_of_multiplicity_lt
theorem lt_emultiplicity_of_lt_multiplicity {n : ℕ} (h : n < multiplicity a b) :
n < emultiplicity a b := by
exact_mod_cast (WithTop.coe_strictMono h).trans_le multiplicity_le_emultiplicity
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.lt_multiplicity_of_lt_emultiplicity (hfin : FiniteMultiplicity a b)
{n : ℕ} (h : n < emultiplicity a b) : n < multiplicity a b := by
rw [emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity hfin] at h
assumption_mod_cast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.lt_multiplicity_of_lt_emultiplicity :=
FiniteMultiplicity.lt_multiplicity_of_lt_emultiplicity
theorem emultiplicity_pos_iff :
0 < emultiplicity a b ↔ 0 < multiplicity a b := by
simp [pos_iff_ne_zero, pos_iff_ne_zero, emultiplicity_eq_zero_iff_multiplicity_eq_zero]
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.def : FiniteMultiplicity a b ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, ¬a ^ (n + 1) ∣ b :=
Iff.rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")] alias multiplicity.Finite.def := FiniteMultiplicity.def
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.not_dvd_of_one_right : FiniteMultiplicity a 1 → ¬a ∣ 1 :=
fun ⟨n, hn⟩ ⟨d, hd⟩ => hn ⟨d ^ (n + 1), (pow_mul_pow_eq_one (n + 1) hd.symm).symm⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.not_dvd_of_one_right := FiniteMultiplicity.not_dvd_of_one_right
@[norm_cast]
theorem Int.natCast_emultiplicity (a b : ℕ) :
emultiplicity (a : ℤ) (b : ℤ) = emultiplicity a b := by
unfold emultiplicity FiniteMultiplicity
congr! <;> norm_cast
@[norm_cast]
theorem Int.natCast_multiplicity (a b : ℕ) : multiplicity (a : ℤ) (b : ℤ) = multiplicity a b :=
multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq (natCast_emultiplicity a b)
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.not_iff_forall : ¬FiniteMultiplicity a b ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, a ^ n ∣ b :=
⟨fun h n =>
Nat.casesOn n
(by
rw [_root_.pow_zero]
exact one_dvd _)
(by simpa [FiniteMultiplicity] using h),
by simp [FiniteMultiplicity, multiplicity]; tauto⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.not_iff_forall := FiniteMultiplicity.not_iff_forall
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.not_unit (h : FiniteMultiplicity a b) : ¬IsUnit a :=
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := h
hn ∘ IsUnit.dvd ∘ IsUnit.pow (n + 1)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.not_unit := FiniteMultiplicity.not_unit
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.mul_left {c : α} :
FiniteMultiplicity a (b * c) → FiniteMultiplicity a b := fun ⟨n, hn⟩ =>
⟨n, fun h => hn (h.trans (dvd_mul_right _ _))⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.mul_left := FiniteMultiplicity.mul_left
theorem pow_dvd_of_le_emultiplicity {k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ emultiplicity a b) :
a ^ k ∣ b := by classical
cases k
· simp
unfold emultiplicity at hk
split at hk
· norm_cast at hk
simpa using (Nat.find_min _ (lt_of_succ_le hk))
· apply FiniteMultiplicity.not_iff_forall.mp ‹_›
theorem pow_dvd_of_le_multiplicity {k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ multiplicity a b) :
a ^ k ∣ b := pow_dvd_of_le_emultiplicity (le_emultiplicity_of_le_multiplicity hk)
@[simp]
theorem pow_multiplicity_dvd (a b : α) : a ^ (multiplicity a b) ∣ b :=
pow_dvd_of_le_multiplicity le_rfl
theorem not_pow_dvd_of_emultiplicity_lt {m : ℕ} (hm : emultiplicity a b < m) :
¬a ^ m ∣ b := fun nh => by
unfold emultiplicity at hm
split at hm
· simp only [cast_lt, find_lt_iff] at hm
obtain ⟨n, hn1, hn2⟩ := hm
exact hn2 ((pow_dvd_pow _ hn1).trans nh)
· simp at hm
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.not_pow_dvd_of_multiplicity_lt (hf : FiniteMultiplicity a b) {m : ℕ}
(hm : multiplicity a b < m) : ¬a ^ m ∣ b := by
apply not_pow_dvd_of_emultiplicity_lt
rw [hf.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity]
norm_cast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.not_pow_dvd_of_multiplicity_lt :=
FiniteMultiplicity.not_pow_dvd_of_multiplicity_lt
theorem multiplicity_pos_of_dvd (hdiv : a ∣ b) : 0 < multiplicity a b := by
refine Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 fun h => ?_
simpa [hdiv] using FiniteMultiplicity.not_pow_dvd_of_multiplicity_lt
(by by_contra! nh; simp [nh] at h) (lt_one_iff.mpr h)
theorem emultiplicity_pos_of_dvd (hdiv : a ∣ b) : 0 < emultiplicity a b :=
lt_emultiplicity_of_lt_multiplicity (multiplicity_pos_of_dvd hdiv)
theorem emultiplicity_eq_of_dvd_of_not_dvd {k : ℕ} (hk : a ^ k ∣ b) (hsucc : ¬a ^ (k + 1) ∣ b) :
emultiplicity a b = k := by classical
have : FiniteMultiplicity a b := ⟨k, hsucc⟩
simp only [emultiplicity, this, ↓reduceDIte, Nat.cast_inj, find_eq_iff, hsucc, not_false_eq_true,
Decidable.not_not, true_and]
exact fun n hn ↦ (pow_dvd_pow _ hn).trans hk
theorem multiplicity_eq_of_dvd_of_not_dvd {k : ℕ} (hk : a ^ k ∣ b) (hsucc : ¬a ^ (k + 1) ∣ b) :
multiplicity a b = k :=
multiplicity_eq_of_emultiplicity_eq_some (emultiplicity_eq_of_dvd_of_not_dvd hk hsucc)
theorem le_emultiplicity_of_pow_dvd {k : ℕ} (hk : a ^ k ∣ b) :
k ≤ emultiplicity a b :=
le_of_not_gt fun hk' => not_pow_dvd_of_emultiplicity_lt hk' hk
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.le_multiplicity_of_pow_dvd (hf : FiniteMultiplicity a b)
{k : ℕ} (hk : a ^ k ∣ b) : k ≤ multiplicity a b :=
hf.le_multiplicity_of_le_emultiplicity (le_emultiplicity_of_pow_dvd hk)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.le_multiplicity_of_pow_dvd :=
FiniteMultiplicity.le_multiplicity_of_pow_dvd
theorem pow_dvd_iff_le_emultiplicity {k : ℕ} :
a ^ k ∣ b ↔ k ≤ emultiplicity a b :=
⟨le_emultiplicity_of_pow_dvd, pow_dvd_of_le_emultiplicity⟩
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.pow_dvd_iff_le_multiplicity (hf : FiniteMultiplicity a b) {k : ℕ} :
a ^ k ∣ b ↔ k ≤ multiplicity a b := by
exact_mod_cast hf.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity ▸ pow_dvd_iff_le_emultiplicity
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.pow_dvd_iff_le_multiplicity :=
FiniteMultiplicity.pow_dvd_iff_le_multiplicity
theorem emultiplicity_lt_iff_not_dvd {k : ℕ} :
emultiplicity a b < k ↔ ¬a ^ k ∣ b := by rw [pow_dvd_iff_le_emultiplicity, not_le]
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.multiplicity_lt_iff_not_dvd {k : ℕ} (hf : FiniteMultiplicity a b) :
multiplicity a b < k ↔ ¬a ^ k ∣ b := by rw [hf.pow_dvd_iff_le_multiplicity, not_le]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.multiplicity_lt_iff_not_dvd :=
FiniteMultiplicity.multiplicity_lt_iff_not_dvd
theorem emultiplicity_eq_coe {n : ℕ} :
emultiplicity a b = n ↔ a ^ n ∣ b ∧ ¬a ^ (n + 1) ∣ b := by
constructor
· intro h
constructor
· apply pow_dvd_of_le_emultiplicity
simp [h]
· apply not_pow_dvd_of_emultiplicity_lt
rw [h]
norm_cast
simp
· rw [and_imp]
apply emultiplicity_eq_of_dvd_of_not_dvd
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.multiplicity_eq_iff (hf : FiniteMultiplicity a b) {n : ℕ} :
multiplicity a b = n ↔ a ^ n ∣ b ∧ ¬a ^ (n + 1) ∣ b := by
simp [← emultiplicity_eq_coe, hf.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity]
theorem emultiplicity_eq_ofNat {a b n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
emultiplicity a b = (ofNat(n) : ℕ∞) ↔ a ^ ofNat(n) ∣ b ∧ ¬a ^ (ofNat(n) + 1) ∣ b :=
emultiplicity_eq_coe
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.multiplicity_eq_iff := FiniteMultiplicity.multiplicity_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.not_of_isUnit_left (b : α) (ha : IsUnit a) : ¬FiniteMultiplicity a b :=
(·.not_unit ha)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.not_of_isUnit_left := FiniteMultiplicity.not_of_isUnit_left
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.not_of_one_left (b : α) : ¬ FiniteMultiplicity 1 b := by simp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.not_of_one_left := FiniteMultiplicity.not_of_one_left
@[simp]
theorem emultiplicity_one_left (b : α) : emultiplicity 1 b = ⊤ :=
emultiplicity_eq_top.2 (FiniteMultiplicity.not_of_one_left _)
@[simp]
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.one_right (ha : FiniteMultiplicity a 1) : multiplicity a 1 = 0 := by
simp [ha.multiplicity_eq_iff, ha.not_dvd_of_one_right]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.one_right := FiniteMultiplicity.one_right
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.not_of_unit_left (a : α) (u : αˣ) : ¬ FiniteMultiplicity (u : α) a :=
FiniteMultiplicity.not_of_isUnit_left a u.isUnit
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.not_of_unit_left := FiniteMultiplicity.not_of_unit_left
theorem emultiplicity_eq_zero :
emultiplicity a b = 0 ↔ ¬a ∣ b := by
by_cases hf : FiniteMultiplicity a b
· rw [← ENat.coe_zero, emultiplicity_eq_coe]
simp
· simpa [emultiplicity_eq_top.2 hf] using FiniteMultiplicity.not_iff_forall.1 hf 1
theorem multiplicity_eq_zero :
multiplicity a b = 0 ↔ ¬a ∣ b :=
(emultiplicity_eq_iff_multiplicity_eq_of_ne_one zero_ne_one).symm.trans emultiplicity_eq_zero
theorem emultiplicity_ne_zero :
emultiplicity a b ≠ 0 ↔ a ∣ b := by
simp [emultiplicity_eq_zero]
theorem multiplicity_ne_zero :
multiplicity a b ≠ 0 ↔ a ∣ b := by
simp [multiplicity_eq_zero]
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd (hfin : FiniteMultiplicity a b) :
∃ c : α, b = a ^ multiplicity a b * c ∧ ¬a ∣ c := by
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := pow_multiplicity_dvd a b
refine ⟨c, hc, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨k, hk⟩
rw [hk, ← mul_assoc, ← _root_.pow_succ] at hc
have h₁ : a ^ (multiplicity a b + 1) ∣ b := ⟨k, hc⟩
exact (hfin.multiplicity_eq_iff.1 (by simp)).2 h₁
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd :=
FiniteMultiplicity.exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd
theorem emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_iff {c d : β} :
emultiplicity a b ≤ emultiplicity c d ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, a ^ n ∣ b → c ^ n ∣ d := by classical
constructor
· exact fun h n hab ↦ pow_dvd_of_le_emultiplicity (le_trans (le_emultiplicity_of_pow_dvd hab) h)
· intro h
unfold emultiplicity
-- aesop? says
split
next h_1 =>
obtain ⟨w, h_1⟩ := h_1
split
next h_2 =>
simp_all only [cast_le, le_find_iff, lt_find_iff, Decidable.not_not, le_refl,
not_true_eq_false, not_false_eq_true, implies_true]
next h_2 => simp_all only [not_exists, Decidable.not_not, le_top]
next h_1 =>
simp_all only [not_exists, Decidable.not_not, not_true_eq_false, top_le_iff,
dite_eq_right_iff, ENat.coe_ne_top, imp_false, not_false_eq_true, implies_true]
theorem FiniteMultiplicity.multiplicity_le_multiplicity_iff {c d : β} (hab : FiniteMultiplicity a b)
(hcd : FiniteMultiplicity c d) :
multiplicity a b ≤ multiplicity c d ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, a ^ n ∣ b → c ^ n ∣ d := by
rw [← WithTop.coe_le_coe, ENat.some_eq_coe, ← hab.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity,
← hcd.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity]
apply emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Finite.multiplicity_le_multiplicity_iff :=
FiniteMultiplicity.multiplicity_le_multiplicity_iff
theorem emultiplicity_eq_emultiplicity_iff {c d : β} :
emultiplicity a b = emultiplicity c d ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, a ^ n ∣ b ↔ c ^ n ∣ d :=
⟨fun h n =>
⟨emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_iff.1 h.le n, emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_iff.1 h.ge n⟩,
fun h => le_antisymm (emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_iff.2 fun n => (h n).mp)
| (emultiplicity_le_emultiplicity_iff.2 fun n => (h n).mpr)⟩
theorem le_emultiplicity_map {F : Type*} [FunLike F α β] [MonoidHomClass F α β]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Multiplicity.lean | 459 | 461 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Lu-Ming Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Lu-Ming Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Fin.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Symmetric
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
/-!
# Circulant matrices
This file contains the definition and basic results about circulant matrices.
Given a vector `v : n → α` indexed by a type that is endowed with subtraction,
`Matrix.circulant v` is the matrix whose `(i, j)`th entry is `v (i - j)`.
## Main results
- `Matrix.circulant`: the circulant matrix generated by a given vector `v : n → α`.
- `Matrix.circulant_mul`: the product of two circulant matrices `circulant v` and `circulant w` is
the circulant matrix generated by `circulant v *ᵥ w`.
- `Matrix.circulant_mul_comm`: multiplication of circulant matrices commutes when the elements do.
## Implementation notes
`Matrix.Fin.foo` is the `Fin n` version of `Matrix.foo`.
Namely, the index type of the circulant matrices in discussion is `Fin n`.
## Tags
circulant, matrix
-/
variable {α β n R : Type*}
namespace Matrix
open Function
open Matrix
/-- Given the condition `[Sub n]` and a vector `v : n → α`,
we define `circulant v` to be the circulant matrix generated by `v` of type `Matrix n n α`.
The `(i,j)`th entry is defined to be `v (i - j)`. -/
def circulant [Sub n] (v : n → α) : Matrix n n α :=
of fun i j => v (i - j)
-- TODO: set as an equation lemma for `circulant`, see https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/3024
@[simp]
theorem circulant_apply [Sub n] (v : n → α) (i j) : circulant v i j = v (i - j) := rfl
theorem circulant_col_zero_eq [SubtractionMonoid n] (v : n → α) (i : n) : circulant v i 0 = v i :=
congr_arg v (sub_zero _)
theorem circulant_injective [SubtractionMonoid n] :
Injective (circulant : (n → α) → Matrix n n α) := by
intro v w h
ext k
rw [← circulant_col_zero_eq v, ← circulant_col_zero_eq w, h]
theorem Fin.circulant_injective : ∀ n, Injective fun v : Fin n → α => circulant v
| 0 => by simp [Injective]
| _ + 1 => Matrix.circulant_injective
@[simp]
theorem circulant_inj [SubtractionMonoid n] {v w : n → α} : circulant v = circulant w ↔ v = w :=
circulant_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem Fin.circulant_inj {n} {v w : Fin n → α} : circulant v = circulant w ↔ v = w :=
(Fin.circulant_injective n).eq_iff
theorem transpose_circulant [SubtractionMonoid n] (v : n → α) :
(circulant v)ᵀ = circulant fun i => v (-i) := by ext; simp
theorem conjTranspose_circulant [Star α] [SubtractionMonoid n] (v : n → α) :
(circulant v)ᴴ = circulant (star fun i => v (-i)) := by ext; simp
theorem Fin.transpose_circulant : ∀ {n} (v : Fin n → α), (circulant v)ᵀ = circulant fun i => v (-i)
| 0 => by simp [Injective, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
| _ + 1 => Matrix.transpose_circulant
theorem Fin.conjTranspose_circulant [Star α] :
∀ {n} (v : Fin n → α), (circulant v)ᴴ = circulant (star fun i => v (-i))
| 0 => by simp [Injective, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
| _ + 1 => Matrix.conjTranspose_circulant
theorem map_circulant [Sub n] (v : n → α) (f : α → β) :
(circulant v).map f = circulant fun i => f (v i) :=
ext fun _ _ => rfl
theorem circulant_neg [Neg α] [Sub n] (v : n → α) : circulant (-v) = -circulant v :=
ext fun _ _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem circulant_zero (α n) [Zero α] [Sub n] : circulant 0 = (0 : Matrix n n α) :=
ext fun _ _ => rfl
theorem circulant_add [Add α] [Sub n] (v w : n → α) :
circulant (v + w) = circulant v + circulant w :=
ext fun _ _ => rfl
theorem circulant_sub [Sub α] [Sub n] (v w : n → α) :
circulant (v - w) = circulant v - circulant w :=
ext fun _ _ => rfl
/-- The product of two circulant matrices `circulant v` and `circulant w` is
the circulant matrix generated by `circulant v *ᵥ w`. -/
theorem circulant_mul [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α] [Fintype n] [AddGroup n] (v w : n → α) :
circulant v * circulant w = circulant (circulant v *ᵥ w) := by
ext i j
simp only [mul_apply, mulVec, circulant_apply, dotProduct]
refine Fintype.sum_equiv (Equiv.subRight j) _ _ ?_
intro x
simp only [Equiv.subRight_apply, sub_sub_sub_cancel_right]
theorem Fin.circulant_mul [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α] :
∀ {n} (v w : Fin n → α), circulant v * circulant w = circulant (circulant v *ᵥ w)
| 0 => by simp [Injective, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
| _ + 1 => Matrix.circulant_mul
/-- Multiplication of circulant matrices commutes when the elements do. -/
theorem circulant_mul_comm [CommMagma α] [AddCommMonoid α] [Fintype n] [AddCommGroup n]
(v w : n → α) : circulant v * circulant w = circulant w * circulant v := by
ext i j
simp only [mul_apply, circulant_apply, mul_comm]
refine Fintype.sum_equiv ((Equiv.subLeft i).trans (Equiv.addRight j)) _ _ ?_
intro x
simp only [Equiv.trans_apply, Equiv.subLeft_apply, Equiv.coe_addRight, add_sub_cancel_right,
mul_comm]
congr 2
abel
theorem Fin.circulant_mul_comm [CommMagma α] [AddCommMonoid α] :
| ∀ {n} (v w : Fin n → α), circulant v * circulant w = circulant w * circulant v
| 0 => by simp [Injective]
| _ + 1 => Matrix.circulant_mul_comm
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Circulant.lean | 136 | 139 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ComplexShape
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.NegOnePow
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.GradedObject.Trifunctor
/-! Signs in constructions on homological complexes
In this file, we shall introduce various typeclasses which will allow
the construction of the total complex of a bicomplex and of the
the monoidal category structure on categories of homological complexes (TODO).
The most important definition is that of `TotalComplexShape c₁ c₂ c₁₂` given
three complex shapes `c₁`, `c₂`, `c₁₂`: it allows the definition of a total
complex functor `HomologicalComplex₂ C c₁ c₂ ⥤ HomologicalComplex C c₁₂` (at least
when suitable coproducts exist).
In particular, we construct an instance of `TotalComplexShape c c c` when `c : ComplexShape I`
and `I` is an additive monoid equipped with a group homomorphism `ε' : Multiplicative I → ℤˣ`
satisfying certain properties (see `ComplexShape.TensorSigns`).
-/
assert_not_exists Field TwoSidedIdeal
variable {I₁ I₂ I₃ I₁₂ I₂₃ J : Type*}
(c₁ : ComplexShape I₁) (c₂ : ComplexShape I₂) (c₃ : ComplexShape I₃)
(c₁₂ : ComplexShape I₁₂) (c₂₃ : ComplexShape I₂₃) (c : ComplexShape J)
/-- A total complex shape for three complexes shapes `c₁`, `c₂`, `c₁₂` on three types
`I₁`, `I₂` and `I₁₂` consists of the data and properties that will allow the construction
of a total complex functor `HomologicalComplex₂ C c₁ c₂ ⥤ HomologicalComplex C c₁₂` which
sends `K` to a complex which in degree `i₁₂ : I₁₂` consists of the coproduct
of the `(K.X i₁).X i₂` such that `π ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ = i₁₂`. -/
class TotalComplexShape where
/-- a map on indices -/
π : I₁ × I₂ → I₁₂
/-- the sign of the horizontal differential in the total complex -/
ε₁ : I₁ × I₂ → ℤˣ
/-- the sign of the vertical differential in the total complex -/
ε₂ : I₁ × I₂ → ℤˣ
rel₁ {i₁ i₁' : I₁} (h : c₁.Rel i₁ i₁') (i₂ : I₂) : c₁₂.Rel (π ⟨i₁, i₂⟩) (π ⟨i₁', i₂⟩)
rel₂ (i₁ : I₁) {i₂ i₂' : I₂} (h : c₂.Rel i₂ i₂') : c₁₂.Rel (π ⟨i₁, i₂⟩) (π ⟨i₁, i₂'⟩)
ε₂_ε₁ {i₁ i₁' : I₁} {i₂ i₂' : I₂} (h₁ : c₁.Rel i₁ i₁') (h₂ : c₂.Rel i₂ i₂') :
ε₂ ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ * ε₁ ⟨i₁, i₂'⟩ = - ε₁ ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ * ε₂ ⟨i₁', i₂⟩
namespace ComplexShape
variable [TotalComplexShape c₁ c₂ c₁₂]
/-- The map `I₁ × I₂ → I₁₂` on indices given by `TotalComplexShape c₁ c₂ c₁₂`. -/
abbrev π (i : I₁ × I₂) : I₁₂ := TotalComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂ i
/-- The sign of the horizontal differential in the total complex. -/
abbrev ε₁ (i : I₁ × I₂) : ℤˣ := TotalComplexShape.ε₁ c₁ c₂ c₁₂ i
/-- The sign of the vertical differential in the total complex. -/
abbrev ε₂ (i : I₁ × I₂) : ℤˣ := TotalComplexShape.ε₂ c₁ c₂ c₁₂ i
variable {c₁}
lemma rel_π₁ {i₁ i₁' : I₁} (h : c₁.Rel i₁ i₁') (i₂ : I₂) :
c₁₂.Rel (π c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁, i₂⟩) (π c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁', i₂⟩) :=
TotalComplexShape.rel₁ h i₂
lemma next_π₁ {i₁ i₁' : I₁} (h : c₁.Rel i₁ i₁') (i₂ : I₂) :
c₁₂.next (π c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁, i₂⟩) = π c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁', i₂⟩ :=
c₁₂.next_eq' (rel_π₁ c₂ c₁₂ h i₂)
lemma prev_π₁ {i₁ i₁' : I₁} (h : c₁.Rel i₁ i₁') (i₂ : I₂) :
c₁₂.prev (π c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁', i₂⟩) = π c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ :=
c₁₂.prev_eq' (rel_π₁ c₂ c₁₂ h i₂)
variable (c₁) {c₂}
lemma rel_π₂ (i₁ : I₁) {i₂ i₂' : I₂} (h : c₂.Rel i₂ i₂') :
c₁₂.Rel (π c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁, i₂⟩) (π c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁, i₂'⟩) :=
TotalComplexShape.rel₂ i₁ h
lemma next_π₂ (i₁ : I₁) {i₂ i₂' : I₂} (h : c₂.Rel i₂ i₂') :
c₁₂.next (π c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁, i₂⟩) = π c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁, i₂'⟩ :=
c₁₂.next_eq' (rel_π₂ c₁ c₁₂ i₁ h)
lemma prev_π₂ (i₁ : I₁) {i₂ i₂' : I₂} (h : c₂.Rel i₂ i₂') :
c₁₂.prev (π c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁, i₂'⟩) = π c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ :=
c₁₂.prev_eq' (rel_π₂ c₁ c₁₂ i₁ h)
variable {c₁}
lemma ε₂_ε₁ {i₁ i₁' : I₁} {i₂ i₂' : I₂} (h₁ : c₁.Rel i₁ i₁') (h₂ : c₂.Rel i₂ i₂') :
ε₂ c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ * ε₁ c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁, i₂'⟩ =
- ε₁ c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ * ε₂ c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁', i₂⟩ :=
| TotalComplexShape.ε₂_ε₁ h₁ h₂
lemma ε₁_ε₂ {i₁ i₁' : I₁} {i₂ i₂' : I₂} (h₁ : c₁.Rel i₁ i₁') (h₂ : c₂.Rel i₂ i₂') :
ε₁ c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ * ε₂ c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ =
- ε₂ c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁', i₂⟩ * ε₁ c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁, i₂'⟩ :=
Eq.trans (mul_one _).symm (by
rw [← Int.units_mul_self (ComplexShape.ε₁ c₁ c₂ c₁₂ (i₁, i₂')), mul_assoc]
conv_lhs =>
arg 2
rw [← mul_assoc, ε₂_ε₁ c₁₂ h₁ h₂]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/ComplexShapeSigns.lean | 96 | 105 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Reid Barton, Mario Carneiro, Kim Morrison, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Category.ULift
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EssentiallySmall
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.EpiMono
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Basic
/-!
# Existence of limits and colimits
In `CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit` we defined `IsLimit c`,
the data showing that a cone `c` is a limit cone.
The two main structures defined in this file are:
* `LimitCone F`, which consists of a choice of cone for `F` and the fact it is a limit cone, and
* `HasLimit F`, asserting the mere existence of some limit cone for `F`.
`HasLimit` is a propositional typeclass
(it's important that it is a proposition merely asserting the existence of a limit,
as otherwise we would have non-defeq problems from incompatible instances).
While `HasLimit` only asserts the existence of a limit cone,
we happily use the axiom of choice in mathlib,
so there are convenience functions all depending on `HasLimit F`:
* `limit F : C`, producing some limit object (of course all such are isomorphic)
* `limit.π F j : limit F ⟶ F.obj j`, the morphisms out of the limit,
* `limit.lift F c : c.pt ⟶ limit F`, the universal morphism from any other `c : Cone F`, etc.
Key to using the `HasLimit` interface is that there is an `@[ext]` lemma stating that
to check `f = g`, for `f g : Z ⟶ limit F`, it suffices to check `f ≫ limit.π F j = g ≫ limit.π F j`
for every `j`.
This, combined with `@[simp]` lemmas, makes it possible to prove many easy facts about limits using
automation (e.g. `tidy`).
There are abbreviations `HasLimitsOfShape J C` and `HasLimits C`
asserting the existence of classes of limits.
Later more are introduced, for finite limits, special shapes of limits, etc.
Ideally, many results about limits should be stated first in terms of `IsLimit`,
and then a result in terms of `HasLimit` derived from this.
At this point, however, this is far from uniformly achieved in mathlib ---
often statements are only written in terms of `HasLimit`.
## Implementation
At present we simply say everything twice, in order to handle both limits and colimits.
It would be highly desirable to have some automation support,
e.g. a `@[dualize]` attribute that behaves similarly to `@[to_additive]`.
## References
* [Stacks: Limits and colimits](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/002D)
-/
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Functor Opposite
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
-- morphism levels before object levels. See note [CategoryTheory universes].
universe v₁ u₁ v₂ u₂ v₃ u₃ v v' v'' u u' u''
variable {J : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J] {K : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} K]
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable {F : J ⥤ C}
section Limit
/-- `LimitCone F` contains a cone over `F` together with the information that it is a limit. -/
structure LimitCone (F : J ⥤ C) where
/-- The cone itself -/
cone : Cone F
/-- The proof that is the limit cone -/
isLimit : IsLimit cone
/-- `HasLimit F` represents the mere existence of a limit for `F`. -/
class HasLimit (F : J ⥤ C) : Prop where mk' ::
/-- There is some limit cone for `F` -/
exists_limit : Nonempty (LimitCone F)
theorem HasLimit.mk {F : J ⥤ C} (d : LimitCone F) : HasLimit F :=
⟨Nonempty.intro d⟩
/-- Use the axiom of choice to extract explicit `LimitCone F` from `HasLimit F`. -/
def getLimitCone (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] : LimitCone F :=
Classical.choice <| HasLimit.exists_limit
variable (J C)
/-- `C` has limits of shape `J` if there exists a limit for every functor `F : J ⥤ C`. -/
class HasLimitsOfShape : Prop where
/-- All functors `F : J ⥤ C` from `J` have limits -/
has_limit : ∀ F : J ⥤ C, HasLimit F := by infer_instance
/-- `C` has all limits of size `v₁ u₁` (`HasLimitsOfSize.{v₁ u₁} C`)
if it has limits of every shape `J : Type u₁` with `[Category.{v₁} J]`.
-/
@[pp_with_univ]
class HasLimitsOfSize (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] : Prop where
/-- All functors `F : J ⥤ C` from all small `J` have limits -/
has_limits_of_shape : ∀ (J : Type u₁) [Category.{v₁} J], HasLimitsOfShape J C := by
infer_instance
/-- `C` has all (small) limits if it has limits of every shape that is as big as its hom-sets. -/
abbrev HasLimits (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] : Prop :=
HasLimitsOfSize.{v, v} C
theorem HasLimits.has_limits_of_shape {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [HasLimits C] (J : Type v)
[Category.{v} J] : HasLimitsOfShape J C :=
HasLimitsOfSize.has_limits_of_shape J
variable {J C}
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) hasLimitOfHasLimitsOfShape {J : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J]
[HasLimitsOfShape J C] (F : J ⥤ C) : HasLimit F :=
HasLimitsOfShape.has_limit F
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) hasLimitsOfShapeOfHasLimits {J : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J]
[HasLimitsOfSize.{v₁, u₁} C] : HasLimitsOfShape J C :=
HasLimitsOfSize.has_limits_of_shape J
-- Interface to the `HasLimit` class.
/-- An arbitrary choice of limit cone for a functor. -/
def limit.cone (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] : Cone F :=
(getLimitCone F).cone
/-- An arbitrary choice of limit object of a functor. -/
def limit (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] :=
(limit.cone F).pt
/-- The projection from the limit object to a value of the functor. -/
def limit.π (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] (j : J) : limit F ⟶ F.obj j :=
(limit.cone F).π.app j
@[reassoc]
theorem limit.π_comp_eqToHom (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] {j j' : J} (hj : j = j') :
limit.π F j ≫ eqToHom (by subst hj; rfl) = limit.π F j' := by
subst hj
simp
@[simp]
theorem limit.cone_x {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] : (limit.cone F).pt = limit F :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem limit.cone_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] : (limit.cone F).π.app = limit.π _ :=
rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.w (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] {j j' : J} (f : j ⟶ j') :
limit.π F j ≫ F.map f = limit.π F j' :=
(limit.cone F).w f
/-- Evidence that the arbitrary choice of cone provided by `limit.cone F` is a limit cone. -/
def limit.isLimit (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] : IsLimit (limit.cone F) :=
(getLimitCone F).isLimit
/-- The morphism from the cone point of any other cone to the limit object. -/
def limit.lift (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) : c.pt ⟶ limit F :=
(limit.isLimit F).lift c
@[simp]
theorem limit.isLimit_lift {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) :
(limit.isLimit F).lift c = limit.lift F c :=
rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.lift_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) (j : J) :
limit.lift F c ≫ limit.π F j = c.π.app j :=
IsLimit.fac _ c j
/-- Functoriality of limits.
Usually this morphism should be accessed through `lim.map`,
but may be needed separately when you have specified limits for the source and target functors,
but not necessarily for all functors of shape `J`.
-/
def limMap {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (α : F ⟶ G) : limit F ⟶ limit G :=
IsLimit.map _ (limit.isLimit G) α
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limMap_π {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (α : F ⟶ G) (j : J) :
limMap α ≫ limit.π G j = limit.π F j ≫ α.app j :=
limit.lift_π _ j
/-- The cone morphism from any cone to the arbitrary choice of limit cone. -/
def limit.coneMorphism {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) : c ⟶ limit.cone F :=
(limit.isLimit F).liftConeMorphism c
@[simp]
theorem limit.coneMorphism_hom {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) :
(limit.coneMorphism c).hom = limit.lift F c :=
rfl
theorem limit.coneMorphism_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) (j : J) :
(limit.coneMorphism c).hom ≫ limit.π F j = c.π.app j := by simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_hom_comp {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {c : Cone F} (hc : IsLimit c)
(j : J) : (IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso hc (limit.isLimit _)).hom ≫ limit.π F j = c.π.app j :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_hom_comp _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {c : Cone F} (hc : IsLimit c)
(j : J) : (IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (limit.isLimit _) hc).inv ≫ limit.π F j = c.π.app j :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp _ _ _
theorem limit.existsUnique {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (t : Cone F) :
∃! l : t.pt ⟶ limit F, ∀ j, l ≫ limit.π F j = t.π.app j :=
(limit.isLimit F).existsUnique _
/-- Given any other limit cone for `F`, the chosen `limit F` is isomorphic to the cone point.
-/
def limit.isoLimitCone {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (t : LimitCone F) : limit F ≅ t.cone.pt :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (limit.isLimit F) t.isLimit
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.isoLimitCone_hom_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (t : LimitCone F) (j : J) :
(limit.isoLimitCone t).hom ≫ t.cone.π.app j = limit.π F j := by
dsimp [limit.isoLimitCone, IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso]
simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.isoLimitCone_inv_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (t : LimitCone F) (j : J) :
(limit.isoLimitCone t).inv ≫ limit.π F j = t.cone.π.app j := by
dsimp [limit.isoLimitCone, IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso]
simp
@[ext]
theorem limit.hom_ext {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {X : C} {f f' : X ⟶ limit F}
(w : ∀ j, f ≫ limit.π F j = f' ≫ limit.π F j) : f = f' :=
(limit.isLimit F).hom_ext w
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.lift_map {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (c : Cone F) (α : F ⟶ G) :
limit.lift F c ≫ limMap α = limit.lift G ((Cones.postcompose α).obj c) := by
ext
rw [assoc, limMap_π, limit.lift_π_assoc, limit.lift_π]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem limit.lift_cone {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] : limit.lift F (limit.cone F) = 𝟙 (limit F) :=
(limit.isLimit _).lift_self
/-- The isomorphism (in `Type`) between
morphisms from a specified object `W` to the limit object,
and cones with cone point `W`.
-/
def limit.homIso (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] (W : C) :
ULift.{u₁} (W ⟶ limit F : Type v) ≅ F.cones.obj (op W) :=
(limit.isLimit F).homIso W
|
@[simp]
theorem limit.homIso_hom (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] {W : C} (f : ULift (W ⟶ limit F)) :
(limit.homIso F W).hom f = (const J).map f.down ≫ (limit.cone F).π :=
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/HasLimits.lean | 259 | 262 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Iterate
import Mathlib.Order.SemiconjSup
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.MonotoneContinuity
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
/-!
# Translation number of a monotone real map that commutes with `x ↦ x + 1`
Let `f : ℝ → ℝ` be a monotone map such that `f (x + 1) = f x + 1` for all `x`. Then the limit
$$
\tau(f)=\lim_{n\to\infty}{f^n(x)-x}{n}
$$
exists and does not depend on `x`. This number is called the *translation number* of `f`.
Different authors use different notation for this number: `τ`, `ρ`, `rot`, etc
In this file we define a structure `CircleDeg1Lift` for bundled maps with these properties, define
translation number of `f : CircleDeg1Lift`, prove some estimates relating `f^n(x)-x` to `τ(f)`. In
case of a continuous map `f` we also prove that `f` admits a point `x` such that `f^n(x)=x+m` if and
only if `τ(f)=m/n`.
Maps of this type naturally appear as lifts of orientation preserving circle homeomorphisms. More
precisely, let `f` be an orientation preserving homeomorphism of the circle $S^1=ℝ/ℤ$, and
consider a real number `a` such that
`⟦a⟧ = f 0`, where `⟦⟧` means the natural projection `ℝ → ℝ/ℤ`. Then there exists a unique
continuous function `F : ℝ → ℝ` such that `F 0 = a` and `⟦F x⟧ = f ⟦x⟧` for all `x` (this fact is
not formalized yet). This function is strictly monotone, continuous, and satisfies
`F (x + 1) = F x + 1`. The number `⟦τ F⟧ : ℝ / ℤ` is called the *rotation number* of `f`.
It does not depend on the choice of `a`.
## Main definitions
* `CircleDeg1Lift`: a monotone map `f : ℝ → ℝ` such that `f (x + 1) = f x + 1` for all `x`;
the type `CircleDeg1Lift` is equipped with `Lattice` and `Monoid` structures; the
multiplication is given by composition: `(f * g) x = f (g x)`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber`: translation number of `f : CircleDeg1Lift`.
## Main statements
We prove the following properties of `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_of_dist_bounded`: if the distance between `(f^n) 0`
and `(g^n) 0` is bounded from above uniformly in `n : ℕ`, then `f` and `g` have equal
translation numbers.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_of_semiconjBy`: if two `CircleDeg1Lift` maps `f`, `g`
are semiconjugate by a `CircleDeg1Lift` map, then `τ f = τ g`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_units_inv`: if `f` is an invertible `CircleDeg1Lift` map
(equivalently, `f` is a lift of an orientation-preserving circle homeomorphism), then
the translation number of `f⁻¹` is the negative of the translation number of `f`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_mul_of_commute`: if `f` and `g` commute, then
`τ (f * g) = τ f + τ g`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_rat_iff`: the translation number of `f` is equal to
a rational number `m / n` if and only if `(f^n) x = x + m` for some `x`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.semiconj_of_bijective_of_translationNumber_eq`: if `f` and `g` are two
bijective `CircleDeg1Lift` maps and their translation numbers are equal, then these
maps are semiconjugate to each other.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.semiconj_of_group_action_of_forall_translationNumber_eq`: let `f₁` and `f₂` be
two actions of a group `G` on the circle by degree 1 maps (formally, `f₁` and `f₂` are two
homomorphisms from `G →* CircleDeg1Lift`). If the translation numbers of `f₁ g` and `f₂ g` are
equal to each other for all `g : G`, then these two actions are semiconjugate by some
`F : CircleDeg1Lift`. This is a version of Proposition 5.4 from [Étienne Ghys, Groupes
d'homeomorphismes du cercle et cohomologie bornee][ghys87:groupes].
## Notation
We use a local notation `τ` for the translation number of `f : CircleDeg1Lift`.
## Implementation notes
We define the translation number of `f : CircleDeg1Lift` to be the limit of the sequence
`(f ^ (2 ^ n)) 0 / (2 ^ n)`, then prove that `((f ^ n) x - x) / n` tends to this number for any `x`.
This way it is much easier to prove that the limit exists and basic properties of the limit.
We define translation number for a wider class of maps `f : ℝ → ℝ` instead of lifts of orientation
preserving circle homeomorphisms for two reasons:
* non-strictly monotone circle self-maps with discontinuities naturally appear as Poincaré maps
for some flows on the two-torus (e.g., one can take a constant flow and glue in a few Cherry
cells);
* definition and some basic properties still work for this class.
## References
* [Étienne Ghys, Groupes d'homeomorphismes du cercle et cohomologie bornee][ghys87:groupes]
## TODO
Here are some short-term goals.
* Introduce a structure or a typeclass for lifts of circle homeomorphisms. We use
`Units CircleDeg1Lift` for now, but it's better to have a dedicated type (or a typeclass?).
* Prove that the `SemiconjBy` relation on circle homeomorphisms is an equivalence relation.
* Introduce `ConditionallyCompleteLattice` structure, use it in the proof of
`CircleDeg1Lift.semiconj_of_group_action_of_forall_translationNumber_eq`.
* Prove that the orbits of the irrational rotation are dense in the circle. Deduce that a
homeomorphism with an irrational rotation is semiconjugate to the corresponding irrational
translation by a continuous `CircleDeg1Lift`.
## Tags
circle homeomorphism, rotation number
-/
open Filter Set Int Topology
open Function hiding Commute
/-!
### Definition and monoid structure
-/
/-- A lift of a monotone degree one map `S¹ → S¹`. -/
structure CircleDeg1Lift : Type extends ℝ →o ℝ where
map_add_one' : ∀ x, toFun (x + 1) = toFun x + 1
namespace CircleDeg1Lift
instance : FunLike CircleDeg1Lift ℝ ℝ where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' | ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩, ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩, rfl => rfl
instance : OrderHomClass CircleDeg1Lift ℝ ℝ where
map_rel f _ _ h := f.monotone' h
@[simp] theorem coe_mk (f h) : ⇑(mk f h) = f := rfl
variable (f g : CircleDeg1Lift)
@[simp] theorem coe_toOrderHom : ⇑f.toOrderHom = f := rfl
protected theorem monotone : Monotone f := f.monotone'
@[mono] theorem mono {x y} (h : x ≤ y) : f x ≤ f y := f.monotone h
theorem strictMono_iff_injective : StrictMono f ↔ Injective f :=
f.monotone.strictMono_iff_injective
@[simp]
theorem map_add_one : ∀ x, f (x + 1) = f x + 1 :=
f.map_add_one'
@[simp]
theorem map_one_add (x : ℝ) : f (1 + x) = 1 + f x := by rw [add_comm, map_add_one, add_comm 1]
@[ext]
theorem ext ⦃f g : CircleDeg1Lift⦄ (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g h
instance : Monoid CircleDeg1Lift where
mul f g :=
{ toOrderHom := f.1.comp g.1
map_add_one' := fun x => by simp [map_add_one] }
one := ⟨.id, fun _ => rfl⟩
mul_one _ := rfl
one_mul _ := rfl
mul_assoc _ _ _ := DFunLike.coe_injective rfl
instance : Inhabited CircleDeg1Lift := ⟨1⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_mul : ⇑(f * g) = f ∘ g :=
rfl
theorem mul_apply (x) : (f * g) x = f (g x) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_one : ⇑(1 : CircleDeg1Lift) = id :=
rfl
instance unitsHasCoeToFun : CoeFun CircleDeg1Liftˣ fun _ => ℝ → ℝ :=
⟨fun f => ⇑(f : CircleDeg1Lift)⟩
@[simp]
theorem units_inv_apply_apply (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) (x : ℝ) :
(f⁻¹ : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) (f x) = x := by simp only [← mul_apply, f.inv_mul, coe_one, id]
@[simp]
theorem units_apply_inv_apply (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) (x : ℝ) :
f ((f⁻¹ : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) x) = x := by simp only [← mul_apply, f.mul_inv, coe_one, id]
/-- If a lift of a circle map is bijective, then it is an order automorphism of the line. -/
def toOrderIso : CircleDeg1Liftˣ →* ℝ ≃o ℝ where
toFun f :=
{ toFun := f
invFun := ⇑f⁻¹
left_inv := units_inv_apply_apply f
right_inv := units_apply_inv_apply f
map_rel_iff' := ⟨fun h => by simpa using mono (↑f⁻¹) h, mono f⟩ }
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' _ _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toOrderIso (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) : ⇑(toOrderIso f) = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toOrderIso_symm (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) :
⇑(toOrderIso f).symm = (f⁻¹ : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toOrderIso_inv (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) : ⇑(toOrderIso f)⁻¹ = (f⁻¹ : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) :=
rfl
theorem isUnit_iff_bijective {f : CircleDeg1Lift} : IsUnit f ↔ Bijective f :=
⟨fun ⟨u, h⟩ => h ▸ (toOrderIso u).bijective, fun h =>
Units.isUnit
{ val := f
inv :=
{ toFun := (Equiv.ofBijective f h).symm
monotone' := fun x y hxy =>
(f.strictMono_iff_injective.2 h.1).le_iff_le.1
(by simp only [Equiv.ofBijective_apply_symm_apply f h, hxy])
map_add_one' := fun x =>
h.1 <| by simp only [Equiv.ofBijective_apply_symm_apply f, f.map_add_one] }
val_inv := ext <| Equiv.ofBijective_apply_symm_apply f h
inv_val := ext <| Equiv.ofBijective_symm_apply_apply f h }⟩
theorem coe_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, ⇑(f ^ n) = f^[n]
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by
ext x
simp [coe_pow n, pow_succ]
theorem semiconjBy_iff_semiconj {f g₁ g₂ : CircleDeg1Lift} :
SemiconjBy f g₁ g₂ ↔ Semiconj f g₁ g₂ :=
CircleDeg1Lift.ext_iff
theorem commute_iff_commute {f g : CircleDeg1Lift} : Commute f g ↔ Function.Commute f g :=
CircleDeg1Lift.ext_iff
/-!
### Translate by a constant
-/
/-- The map `y ↦ x + y` as a `CircleDeg1Lift`. More precisely, we define a homomorphism from
`Multiplicative ℝ` to `CircleDeg1Liftˣ`, so the translation by `x` is
`translation (Multiplicative.ofAdd x)`. -/
def translate : Multiplicative ℝ →* CircleDeg1Liftˣ := MonoidHom.toHomUnits <|
{ toFun := fun x =>
⟨⟨fun y => x.toAdd + y, fun _ _ h => add_le_add_left h _⟩, fun _ =>
(add_assoc _ _ _).symm⟩
map_one' := ext <| zero_add
map_mul' := fun _ _ => ext <| add_assoc _ _ }
@[simp]
theorem translate_apply (x y : ℝ) : translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) y = x + y :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem translate_inv_apply (x y : ℝ) : (translate <| Multiplicative.ofAdd x)⁻¹ y = -x + y :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem translate_zpow (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) :
translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) ^ n = translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd <| ↑n * x) := by
simp only [← zsmul_eq_mul, ofAdd_zsmul, MonoidHom.map_zpow]
@[simp]
theorem translate_pow (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) :
translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) ^ n = translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd <| ↑n * x) :=
translate_zpow x n
@[simp]
theorem translate_iterate (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) :
(translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd x))^[n] = translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd <| ↑n * x) := by
rw [← coe_pow, ← Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val, translate_pow]
/-!
### Commutativity with integer translations
In this section we prove that `f` commutes with translations by an integer number.
First we formulate these statements (for a natural or an integer number,
addition on the left or on the right, addition or subtraction) using `Function.Commute`,
then reformulate as `simp` lemmas `map_int_add` etc.
-/
theorem commute_nat_add (n : ℕ) : Function.Commute f (n + ·) := by
simpa only [nsmul_one, add_left_iterate] using Function.Commute.iterate_right f.map_one_add n
theorem commute_add_nat (n : ℕ) : Function.Commute f (· + n) := by
simp only [add_comm _ (n : ℝ), f.commute_nat_add n]
theorem commute_sub_nat (n : ℕ) : Function.Commute f (· - n) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using
(f.commute_add_nat n).inverses_right (Equiv.addRight _).right_inv (Equiv.addRight _).left_inv
theorem commute_add_int : ∀ n : ℤ, Function.Commute f (· + n)
| (n : ℕ) => f.commute_add_nat n
| -[n+1] => by simpa [sub_eq_add_neg] using f.commute_sub_nat (n + 1)
theorem commute_int_add (n : ℤ) : Function.Commute f (n + ·) := by
simpa only [add_comm _ (n : ℝ)] using f.commute_add_int n
theorem commute_sub_int (n : ℤ) : Function.Commute f (· - n) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using
(f.commute_add_int n).inverses_right (Equiv.addRight _).right_inv (Equiv.addRight _).left_inv
@[simp]
theorem map_int_add (m : ℤ) (x : ℝ) : f (m + x) = m + f x :=
f.commute_int_add m x
@[simp]
theorem map_add_int (x : ℝ) (m : ℤ) : f (x + m) = f x + m :=
f.commute_add_int m x
@[simp]
theorem map_sub_int (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : f (x - n) = f x - n :=
f.commute_sub_int n x
@[simp]
theorem map_add_nat (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : f (x + n) = f x + n :=
f.map_add_int x n
@[simp]
theorem map_nat_add (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : f (n + x) = n + f x :=
f.map_int_add n x
@[simp]
theorem map_sub_nat (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : f (x - n) = f x - n :=
f.map_sub_int x n
theorem map_int_of_map_zero (n : ℤ) : f n = f 0 + n := by rw [← f.map_add_int, zero_add]
@[simp]
theorem map_fract_sub_fract_eq (x : ℝ) : f (fract x) - fract x = f x - x := by
rw [Int.fract, f.map_sub_int, sub_sub_sub_cancel_right]
/-!
### Pointwise order on circle maps
-/
/-- Monotone circle maps form a lattice with respect to the pointwise order -/
noncomputable instance : Lattice CircleDeg1Lift where
sup f g :=
{ toFun := fun x => max (f x) (g x)
monotone' := fun _ _ h => max_le_max (f.mono h) (g.mono h)
-- TODO: generalize to `Monotone.max`
map_add_one' := fun x => by simp [max_add_add_right] }
le f g := ∀ x, f x ≤ g x
le_refl f x := le_refl (f x)
le_trans _ _ _ h₁₂ h₂₃ x := le_trans (h₁₂ x) (h₂₃ x)
le_antisymm _ _ h₁₂ h₂₁ := ext fun x => le_antisymm (h₁₂ x) (h₂₁ x)
le_sup_left f g x := le_max_left (f x) (g x)
le_sup_right f g x := le_max_right (f x) (g x)
sup_le _ _ _ h₁ h₂ x := max_le (h₁ x) (h₂ x)
inf f g :=
{ toFun := fun x => min (f x) (g x)
monotone' := fun _ _ h => min_le_min (f.mono h) (g.mono h)
map_add_one' := fun x => by simp [min_add_add_right] }
inf_le_left f g x := min_le_left (f x) (g x)
inf_le_right f g x := min_le_right (f x) (g x)
le_inf _ _ _ h₂ h₃ x := le_min (h₂ x) (h₃ x)
@[simp]
theorem sup_apply (x : ℝ) : (f ⊔ g) x = max (f x) (g x) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem inf_apply (x : ℝ) : (f ⊓ g) x = min (f x) (g x) :=
rfl
theorem iterate_monotone (n : ℕ) : Monotone fun f : CircleDeg1Lift => f^[n] := fun f _ h =>
f.monotone.iterate_le_of_le h _
theorem iterate_mono {f g : CircleDeg1Lift} (h : f ≤ g) (n : ℕ) : f^[n] ≤ g^[n] :=
iterate_monotone n h
theorem pow_mono {f g : CircleDeg1Lift} (h : f ≤ g) (n : ℕ) : f ^ n ≤ g ^ n := fun x => by
simp only [coe_pow, iterate_mono h n x]
theorem pow_monotone (n : ℕ) : Monotone fun f : CircleDeg1Lift => f ^ n := fun _ _ h => pow_mono h n
/-!
### Estimates on `(f * g) 0`
We prove the estimates `f 0 + ⌊g 0⌋ ≤ f (g 0) ≤ f 0 + ⌈g 0⌉` and some corollaries with added/removed
floors and ceils.
We also prove that for two semiconjugate maps `g₁`, `g₂`, the distance between `g₁ 0` and `g₂ 0`
is less than two.
-/
theorem map_le_of_map_zero (x : ℝ) : f x ≤ f 0 + ⌈x⌉ :=
calc
f x ≤ f ⌈x⌉ := f.monotone <| le_ceil _
_ = f 0 + ⌈x⌉ := f.map_int_of_map_zero _
theorem map_map_zero_le : f (g 0) ≤ f 0 + ⌈g 0⌉ :=
f.map_le_of_map_zero (g 0)
theorem floor_map_map_zero_le : ⌊f (g 0)⌋ ≤ ⌊f 0⌋ + ⌈g 0⌉ :=
calc
⌊f (g 0)⌋ ≤ ⌊f 0 + ⌈g 0⌉⌋ := floor_mono <| f.map_map_zero_le g
_ = ⌊f 0⌋ + ⌈g 0⌉ := floor_add_intCast _ _
theorem ceil_map_map_zero_le : ⌈f (g 0)⌉ ≤ ⌈f 0⌉ + ⌈g 0⌉ :=
calc
⌈f (g 0)⌉ ≤ ⌈f 0 + ⌈g 0⌉⌉ := ceil_mono <| f.map_map_zero_le g
_ = ⌈f 0⌉ + ⌈g 0⌉ := ceil_add_intCast _ _
theorem map_map_zero_lt : f (g 0) < f 0 + g 0 + 1 :=
calc
f (g 0) ≤ f 0 + ⌈g 0⌉ := f.map_map_zero_le g
_ < f 0 + (g 0 + 1) := add_lt_add_left (ceil_lt_add_one _) _
_ = f 0 + g 0 + 1 := (add_assoc _ _ _).symm
theorem le_map_of_map_zero (x : ℝ) : f 0 + ⌊x⌋ ≤ f x :=
calc
f 0 + ⌊x⌋ = f ⌊x⌋ := (f.map_int_of_map_zero _).symm
_ ≤ f x := f.monotone <| floor_le _
theorem le_map_map_zero : f 0 + ⌊g 0⌋ ≤ f (g 0) :=
f.le_map_of_map_zero (g 0)
theorem le_floor_map_map_zero : ⌊f 0⌋ + ⌊g 0⌋ ≤ ⌊f (g 0)⌋ :=
calc
⌊f 0⌋ + ⌊g 0⌋ = ⌊f 0 + ⌊g 0⌋⌋ := (floor_add_intCast _ _).symm
_ ≤ ⌊f (g 0)⌋ := floor_mono <| f.le_map_map_zero g
theorem le_ceil_map_map_zero : ⌈f 0⌉ + ⌊g 0⌋ ≤ ⌈(f * g) 0⌉ :=
calc
⌈f 0⌉ + ⌊g 0⌋ = ⌈f 0 + ⌊g 0⌋⌉ := (ceil_add_intCast _ _).symm
_ ≤ ⌈f (g 0)⌉ := ceil_mono <| f.le_map_map_zero g
theorem lt_map_map_zero : f 0 + g 0 - 1 < f (g 0) :=
calc
f 0 + g 0 - 1 = f 0 + (g 0 - 1) := add_sub_assoc _ _ _
_ < f 0 + ⌊g 0⌋ := add_lt_add_left (sub_one_lt_floor _) _
_ ≤ f (g 0) := f.le_map_map_zero g
theorem dist_map_map_zero_lt : dist (f 0 + g 0) (f (g 0)) < 1 := by
rw [dist_comm, Real.dist_eq, abs_lt, lt_sub_iff_add_lt', sub_lt_iff_lt_add', ← sub_eq_add_neg]
exact ⟨f.lt_map_map_zero g, f.map_map_zero_lt g⟩
theorem dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconj {f g₁ g₂ : CircleDeg1Lift} (h : Function.Semiconj f g₁ g₂) :
dist (g₁ 0) (g₂ 0) < 2 :=
calc
dist (g₁ 0) (g₂ 0) ≤ dist (g₁ 0) (f (g₁ 0) - f 0) + dist _ (g₂ 0) := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ = dist (f 0 + g₁ 0) (f (g₁ 0)) + dist (g₂ 0 + f 0) (g₂ (f 0)) := by
simp only [h.eq, Real.dist_eq, sub_sub, add_comm (f 0), sub_sub_eq_add_sub,
abs_sub_comm (g₂ (f 0))]
_ < 1 + 1 := add_lt_add (f.dist_map_map_zero_lt g₁) (g₂.dist_map_map_zero_lt f)
_ = 2 := one_add_one_eq_two
theorem dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconjBy {f g₁ g₂ : CircleDeg1Lift} (h : SemiconjBy f g₁ g₂) :
dist (g₁ 0) (g₂ 0) < 2 :=
dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconj <| semiconjBy_iff_semiconj.1 h
/-!
### Limits at infinities and continuity
-/
protected theorem tendsto_atBot : Tendsto f atBot atBot :=
tendsto_atBot_mono f.map_le_of_map_zero <| tendsto_atBot_add_const_left _ _ <|
(tendsto_atBot_mono fun x => (ceil_lt_add_one x).le) <|
tendsto_atBot_add_const_right _ _ tendsto_id
protected theorem tendsto_atTop : Tendsto f atTop atTop :=
tendsto_atTop_mono f.le_map_of_map_zero <| tendsto_atTop_add_const_left _ _ <|
(tendsto_atTop_mono fun x => (sub_one_lt_floor x).le) <| by
simpa [sub_eq_add_neg] using tendsto_atTop_add_const_right _ _ tendsto_id
theorem continuous_iff_surjective : Continuous f ↔ Function.Surjective f :=
⟨fun h => h.surjective f.tendsto_atTop f.tendsto_atBot, f.monotone.continuous_of_surjective⟩
/-!
### Estimates on `(f^n) x`
If we know that `f x` is `≤`/`<`/`≥`/`>`/`=` to `x + m`, then we have a similar estimate on
`f^[n] x` and `x + n * m`.
For `≤`, `≥`, and `=` we formulate both `of` (implication) and `iff` versions because implications
work for `n = 0`. For `<` and `>` we formulate only `iff` versions.
-/
theorem iterate_le_of_map_le_add_int {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} (h : f x ≤ x + m) (n : ℕ) :
f^[n] x ≤ x + n * m := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using
(f.commute_add_int m).iterate_le_of_map_le f.monotone (monotone_id.add_const (m : ℝ)) h n
theorem le_iterate_of_add_int_le_map {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} (h : x + m ≤ f x) (n : ℕ) :
x + n * m ≤ f^[n] x := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using
(f.commute_add_int m).symm.iterate_le_of_map_le (monotone_id.add_const (m : ℝ)) f.monotone h n
theorem iterate_eq_of_map_eq_add_int {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} (h : f x = x + m) (n : ℕ) :
f^[n] x = x + n * m := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using (f.commute_add_int m).iterate_eq_of_map_eq n h
theorem iterate_pos_le_iff {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
f^[n] x ≤ x + n * m ↔ f x ≤ x + m := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using
(f.commute_add_int m).iterate_pos_le_iff_map_le f.monotone (strictMono_id.add_const (m : ℝ)) hn
theorem iterate_pos_lt_iff {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
f^[n] x < x + n * m ↔ f x < x + m := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using
(f.commute_add_int m).iterate_pos_lt_iff_map_lt f.monotone (strictMono_id.add_const (m : ℝ)) hn
theorem iterate_pos_eq_iff {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
f^[n] x = x + n * m ↔ f x = x + m := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using
(f.commute_add_int m).iterate_pos_eq_iff_map_eq f.monotone (strictMono_id.add_const (m : ℝ)) hn
theorem le_iterate_pos_iff {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
x + n * m ≤ f^[n] x ↔ x + m ≤ f x := by
simpa only [not_lt] using not_congr (f.iterate_pos_lt_iff hn)
theorem lt_iterate_pos_iff {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
x + n * m < f^[n] x ↔ x + m < f x := by
simpa only [not_le] using not_congr (f.iterate_pos_le_iff hn)
theorem mul_floor_map_zero_le_floor_iterate_zero (n : ℕ) : ↑n * ⌊f 0⌋ ≤ ⌊f^[n] 0⌋ := by
rw [le_floor, Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_natCast, ← zero_add ((n : ℝ) * _)]
apply le_iterate_of_add_int_le_map
simp [floor_le]
/-!
### Definition of translation number
-/
noncomputable section
/-- An auxiliary sequence used to define the translation number. -/
def transnumAuxSeq (n : ℕ) : ℝ :=
(f ^ (2 ^ n : ℕ)) 0 / 2 ^ n
/-- The translation number of a `CircleDeg1Lift`, $τ(f)=\lim_{n→∞}\frac{f^n(x)-x}{n}$. We use
an auxiliary sequence `\frac{f^{2^n}(0)}{2^n}` to define `τ(f)` because some proofs are simpler
this way. -/
def translationNumber : ℝ :=
limUnder atTop f.transnumAuxSeq
end
-- TODO: choose two different symbols for `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber` and the future
-- `circle_mono_homeo.rotation_number`, then make them `localized notation`s
local notation "τ" => translationNumber
theorem transnumAuxSeq_def : f.transnumAuxSeq = fun n : ℕ => (f ^ (2 ^ n : ℕ)) 0 / 2 ^ n :=
rfl
theorem translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto_aux {τ' : ℝ} (h : Tendsto f.transnumAuxSeq atTop (𝓝 τ')) :
τ f = τ' :=
h.limUnder_eq
theorem translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto₀ {τ' : ℝ}
(h : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => f^[n] 0 / n) atTop (𝓝 τ')) : τ f = τ' :=
f.translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto_aux <| by
simpa [Function.comp_def, transnumAuxSeq_def, coe_pow] using
h.comp (Nat.tendsto_pow_atTop_atTop_of_one_lt one_lt_two)
theorem translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto₀' {τ' : ℝ}
(h : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => f^[n + 1] 0 / (n + 1)) atTop (𝓝 τ')) : τ f = τ' :=
f.translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto₀ <| (tendsto_add_atTop_iff_nat 1).1 (mod_cast h)
theorem transnumAuxSeq_zero : f.transnumAuxSeq 0 = f 0 := by simp [transnumAuxSeq]
theorem transnumAuxSeq_dist_lt (n : ℕ) :
dist (f.transnumAuxSeq n) (f.transnumAuxSeq (n + 1)) < 1 / 2 / 2 ^ n := by
have : 0 < (2 ^ (n + 1) : ℝ) := pow_pos zero_lt_two _
rw [div_div, ← pow_succ', ← abs_of_pos this]
calc
_ = dist ((f ^ 2 ^ n) 0 + (f ^ 2 ^ n) 0) ((f ^ 2 ^ n) ((f ^ 2 ^ n) 0)) / |2 ^ (n + 1)| := by
simp_rw [transnumAuxSeq, Real.dist_eq]
rw [← abs_div, sub_div, pow_succ, pow_succ', ← two_mul, mul_div_mul_left _ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
pow_mul, sq, mul_apply]
_ < _ := by gcongr; exact (f ^ 2 ^ n).dist_map_map_zero_lt (f ^ 2 ^ n)
theorem tendsto_translationNumber_aux : Tendsto f.transnumAuxSeq atTop (𝓝 <| τ f) :=
(cauchySeq_of_le_geometric_two fun n => le_of_lt <| f.transnumAuxSeq_dist_lt n).tendsto_limUnder
theorem dist_map_zero_translationNumber_le : dist (f 0) (τ f) ≤ 1 :=
f.transnumAuxSeq_zero ▸
dist_le_of_le_geometric_two_of_tendsto₀ (fun n => le_of_lt <| f.transnumAuxSeq_dist_lt n)
f.tendsto_translationNumber_aux
theorem tendsto_translationNumber_of_dist_bounded_aux (x : ℕ → ℝ) (C : ℝ)
(H : ∀ n : ℕ, dist ((f ^ n) 0) (x n) ≤ C) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => x (2 ^ n) / 2 ^ n) atTop (𝓝 <| τ f) := by
| apply f.tendsto_translationNumber_aux.congr_dist (squeeze_zero (fun _ => dist_nonneg) _ _)
· exact fun n => C / 2 ^ n
· intro n
have : 0 < (2 ^ n : ℝ) := pow_pos zero_lt_two _
| Mathlib/Dynamics/Circle/RotationNumber/TranslationNumber.lean | 599 | 602 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Data.Sum.Order
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.PPWithUniv
/-!
# Ordinals
Ordinals are defined as equivalences of well-ordered sets under order isomorphism. They are endowed
with a total order, where an ordinal is smaller than another one if it embeds into it as an
initial segment (or, equivalently, in any way). This total order is well founded.
## Main definitions
* `Ordinal`: the type of ordinals (in a given universe)
* `Ordinal.type r`: given a well-founded order `r`, this is the corresponding ordinal
* `Ordinal.typein r a`: given a well-founded order `r` on a type `α`, and `a : α`, the ordinal
corresponding to all elements smaller than `a`.
* `enum r ⟨o, h⟩`: given a well-order `r` on a type `α`, and an ordinal `o` strictly smaller than
the ordinal corresponding to `r` (this is the assumption `h`), returns the `o`-th element of `α`.
In other words, the elements of `α` can be enumerated using ordinals up to `type r`.
* `Ordinal.card o`: the cardinality of an ordinal `o`.
* `Ordinal.lift` lifts an ordinal in universe `u` to an ordinal in universe `max u v`.
For a version registering additionally that this is an initial segment embedding, see
`Ordinal.liftInitialSeg`.
For a version registering that it is a principal segment embedding if `u < v`, see
`Ordinal.liftPrincipalSeg`.
* `Ordinal.omega0` or `ω` is the order type of `ℕ`. It is called this to match `Cardinal.aleph0`
and so that the omega function can be named `Ordinal.omega`. This definition is universe
polymorphic: `Ordinal.omega0.{u} : Ordinal.{u}` (contrast with `ℕ : Type`, which lives in
a specific universe). In some cases the universe level has to be given explicitly.
* `o₁ + o₂` is the order on the disjoint union of `o₁` and `o₂` obtained by declaring that
every element of `o₁` is smaller than every element of `o₂`.
The main properties of addition (and the other operations on ordinals) are stated and proved in
`Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean`.
Here, we only introduce it and prove its basic properties to deduce the fact that the order on
ordinals is total (and well founded).
* `succ o` is the successor of the ordinal `o`.
* `Cardinal.ord c`: when `c` is a cardinal, `ord c` is the smallest ordinal with this cardinality.
It is the canonical way to represent a cardinal with an ordinal.
A conditionally complete linear order with bot structure is registered on ordinals, where `⊥` is
`0`, the ordinal corresponding to the empty type, and `Inf` is the minimum for nonempty sets and `0`
for the empty set by convention.
## Notations
* `ω` is a notation for the first infinite ordinal in the locale `Ordinal`.
-/
assert_not_exists Module Field
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Equiv Order
open scoped Cardinal InitialSeg
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
{r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} {t : γ → γ → Prop}
/-! ### Definition of ordinals -/
/-- Bundled structure registering a well order on a type. Ordinals will be defined as a quotient
of this type. -/
structure WellOrder : Type (u + 1) where
/-- The underlying type of the order. -/
α : Type u
/-- The underlying relation of the order. -/
r : α → α → Prop
/-- The proposition that `r` is a well-ordering for `α`. -/
wo : IsWellOrder α r
attribute [instance] WellOrder.wo
namespace WellOrder
instance inhabited : Inhabited WellOrder :=
⟨⟨PEmpty, _, inferInstanceAs (IsWellOrder PEmpty EmptyRelation)⟩⟩
end WellOrder
/-- Equivalence relation on well orders on arbitrary types in universe `u`, given by order
isomorphism. -/
instance Ordinal.isEquivalent : Setoid WellOrder where
r := fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ => Nonempty (r ≃r s)
iseqv :=
⟨fun _ => ⟨RelIso.refl _⟩, fun ⟨e⟩ => ⟨e.symm⟩, fun ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩ => ⟨e₁.trans e₂⟩⟩
/-- `Ordinal.{u}` is the type of well orders in `Type u`, up to order isomorphism. -/
@[pp_with_univ]
def Ordinal : Type (u + 1) :=
Quotient Ordinal.isEquivalent
/-- A "canonical" type order-isomorphic to the ordinal `o`, living in the same universe. This is
defined through the axiom of choice.
Use this over `Iio o` only when it is paramount to have a `Type u` rather than a `Type (u + 1)`. -/
def Ordinal.toType (o : Ordinal.{u}) : Type u :=
o.out.α
instance hasWellFounded_toType (o : Ordinal) : WellFoundedRelation o.toType :=
⟨o.out.r, o.out.wo.wf⟩
instance linearOrder_toType (o : Ordinal) : LinearOrder o.toType :=
@IsWellOrder.linearOrder _ o.out.r o.out.wo
instance wellFoundedLT_toType_lt (o : Ordinal) : WellFoundedLT o.toType :=
o.out.wo.toIsWellFounded
namespace Ordinal
noncomputable instance (o : Ordinal) : SuccOrder o.toType :=
SuccOrder.ofLinearWellFoundedLT o.toType
/-! ### Basic properties of the order type -/
/-- The order type of a well order is an ordinal. -/
def type (r : α → α → Prop) [wo : IsWellOrder α r] : Ordinal :=
⟦⟨α, r, wo⟩⟧
/-- `typeLT α` is an abbreviation for the order type of the `<` relation of `α`. -/
scoped notation "typeLT " α:70 => @Ordinal.type α (· < ·) inferInstance
instance zero : Zero Ordinal :=
⟨type <| @EmptyRelation PEmpty⟩
instance inhabited : Inhabited Ordinal :=
⟨0⟩
instance one : One Ordinal :=
⟨type <| @EmptyRelation PUnit⟩
@[simp]
theorem type_toType (o : Ordinal) : typeLT o.toType = o :=
o.out_eq
theorem type_eq {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] :
type r = type s ↔ Nonempty (r ≃r s) :=
Quotient.eq'
theorem _root_.RelIso.ordinal_type_eq {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] (h : r ≃r s) : type r = type s :=
type_eq.2 ⟨h⟩
theorem type_eq_zero_of_empty (r) [IsWellOrder α r] [IsEmpty α] : type r = 0 :=
(RelIso.relIsoOfIsEmpty r _).ordinal_type_eq
@[simp]
theorem type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty [IsWellOrder α r] : type r = 0 ↔ IsEmpty α :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨s⟩ := type_eq.1 h
s.toEquiv.isEmpty,
@type_eq_zero_of_empty α r _⟩
theorem type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty [IsWellOrder α r] : type r ≠ 0 ↔ Nonempty α := by simp
theorem type_ne_zero_of_nonempty (r) [IsWellOrder α r] [h : Nonempty α] : type r ≠ 0 :=
type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty.2 h
theorem type_pEmpty : type (@EmptyRelation PEmpty) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem type_empty : type (@EmptyRelation Empty) = 0 :=
type_eq_zero_of_empty _
theorem type_eq_one_of_unique (r) [IsWellOrder α r] [Nonempty α] [Subsingleton α] : type r = 1 := by
cases nonempty_unique α
exact (RelIso.ofUniqueOfIrrefl r _).ordinal_type_eq
@[simp]
theorem type_eq_one_iff_unique [IsWellOrder α r] : type r = 1 ↔ Nonempty (Unique α) :=
⟨fun h ↦ let ⟨s⟩ := type_eq.1 h; ⟨s.toEquiv.unique⟩,
fun ⟨_⟩ ↦ type_eq_one_of_unique r⟩
theorem type_pUnit : type (@EmptyRelation PUnit) = 1 :=
rfl
theorem type_unit : type (@EmptyRelation Unit) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toType_empty_iff_eq_zero {o : Ordinal} : IsEmpty o.toType ↔ o = 0 := by
rw [← @type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty o.toType (· < ·), type_toType]
instance isEmpty_toType_zero : IsEmpty (toType 0) :=
toType_empty_iff_eq_zero.2 rfl
@[simp]
theorem toType_nonempty_iff_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} : Nonempty o.toType ↔ o ≠ 0 := by
rw [← @type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty o.toType (· < ·), type_toType]
protected theorem one_ne_zero : (1 : Ordinal) ≠ 0 :=
type_ne_zero_of_nonempty _
instance nontrivial : Nontrivial Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨⟨1, 0, Ordinal.one_ne_zero⟩⟩
/-- `Quotient.inductionOn` specialized to ordinals.
Not to be confused with well-founded recursion `Ordinal.induction`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn {C : Ordinal → Prop} (o : Ordinal)
(H : ∀ (α r) [IsWellOrder α r], C (type r)) : C o :=
Quot.inductionOn o fun ⟨α, r, wo⟩ => @H α r wo
/-- `Quotient.inductionOn₂` specialized to ordinals.
Not to be confused with well-founded recursion `Ordinal.induction`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn₂ {C : Ordinal → Ordinal → Prop} (o₁ o₂ : Ordinal)
(H : ∀ (α r) [IsWellOrder α r] (β s) [IsWellOrder β s], C (type r) (type s)) : C o₁ o₂ :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ o₁ o₂ fun ⟨α, r, wo₁⟩ ⟨β, s, wo₂⟩ => @H α r wo₁ β s wo₂
/-- `Quotient.inductionOn₃` specialized to ordinals.
Not to be confused with well-founded recursion `Ordinal.induction`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn₃ {C : Ordinal → Ordinal → Ordinal → Prop} (o₁ o₂ o₃ : Ordinal)
(H : ∀ (α r) [IsWellOrder α r] (β s) [IsWellOrder β s] (γ t) [IsWellOrder γ t],
C (type r) (type s) (type t)) : C o₁ o₂ o₃ :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ o₁ o₂ o₃ fun ⟨α, r, wo₁⟩ ⟨β, s, wo₂⟩ ⟨γ, t, wo₃⟩ =>
@H α r wo₁ β s wo₂ γ t wo₃
open Classical in
/-- To prove a result on ordinals, it suffices to prove it for order types of well-orders. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOnWellOrder {C : Ordinal → Prop} (o : Ordinal)
(H : ∀ (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedLT α], C (typeLT α)) : C o :=
inductionOn o fun α r wo ↦ @H α (linearOrderOfSTO r) wo.toIsWellFounded
open Classical in
/-- To define a function on ordinals, it suffices to define them on order types of well-orders.
Since `LinearOrder` is data-carrying, `liftOnWellOrder_type` is not a definitional equality, unlike
`Quotient.liftOn_mk` which is always def-eq. -/
def liftOnWellOrder {δ : Sort v} (o : Ordinal) (f : ∀ (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedLT α], δ)
(c : ∀ (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedLT α] (β) [LinearOrder β] [WellFoundedLT β],
typeLT α = typeLT β → f α = f β) : δ :=
Quotient.liftOn o (fun w ↦ @f w.α (linearOrderOfSTO w.r) w.wo.toIsWellFounded)
fun w₁ w₂ h ↦ @c
w₁.α (linearOrderOfSTO w₁.r) w₁.wo.toIsWellFounded
w₂.α (linearOrderOfSTO w₂.r) w₂.wo.toIsWellFounded
(Quotient.sound h)
@[simp]
theorem liftOnWellOrder_type {δ : Sort v} (f : ∀ (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedLT α], δ)
(c : ∀ (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedLT α] (β) [LinearOrder β] [WellFoundedLT β],
typeLT α = typeLT β → f α = f β) {γ} [LinearOrder γ] [WellFoundedLT γ] :
liftOnWellOrder (typeLT γ) f c = f γ := by
change Quotient.liftOn' ⟦_⟧ _ _ = _
rw [Quotient.liftOn'_mk]
congr
exact LinearOrder.ext_lt fun _ _ ↦ Iff.rfl
/-! ### The order on ordinals -/
/--
For `Ordinal`:
* less-equal is defined such that well orders `r` and `s` satisfy `type r ≤ type s` if there exists
a function embedding `r` as an *initial* segment of `s`.
* less-than is defined such that well orders `r` and `s` satisfy `type r < type s` if there exists
a function embedding `r` as a *principal* segment of `s`.
Note that most of the relevant results on initial and principal segments are proved in the
`Order.InitialSeg` file.
-/
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder Ordinal where
le a b :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ a b (fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ => Nonempty (r ≼i s))
fun _ _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ => propext
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => ⟨f.symm.toInitialSeg.trans <| h.trans g.toInitialSeg⟩, fun ⟨h⟩ =>
⟨f.toInitialSeg.trans <| h.trans g.symm.toInitialSeg⟩⟩
lt a b :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ a b (fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ => Nonempty (r ≺i s))
fun _ _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ => propext
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => ⟨PrincipalSeg.relIsoTrans f.symm <| h.transRelIso g⟩,
fun ⟨h⟩ => ⟨PrincipalSeg.relIsoTrans f <| h.transRelIso g.symm⟩⟩
le_refl := Quot.ind fun ⟨_, _, _⟩ => ⟨InitialSeg.refl _⟩
le_trans a b c :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ => ⟨f.trans g⟩
lt_iff_le_not_le a b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun _ _ =>
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨⟨f⟩, fun ⟨g⟩ => (f.transInitial g).irrefl⟩, fun ⟨⟨f⟩, h⟩ =>
f.principalSumRelIso.recOn (fun g => ⟨g⟩) fun g => (h ⟨g.symm.toInitialSeg⟩).elim⟩
le_antisymm a b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun _ _ ⟨h₁⟩ ⟨h₂⟩ =>
Quot.sound ⟨InitialSeg.antisymm h₁ h₂⟩
instance : LinearOrder Ordinal :=
{inferInstanceAs (PartialOrder Ordinal) with
le_total := fun a b => Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ =>
(InitialSeg.total r s).recOn (fun f => Or.inl ⟨f⟩) fun f => Or.inr ⟨f⟩
toDecidableLE := Classical.decRel _ }
theorem _root_.InitialSeg.ordinal_type_le {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (h : r ≼i s) : type r ≤ type s :=
⟨h⟩
theorem _root_.RelEmbedding.ordinal_type_le {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (h : r ↪r s) : type r ≤ type s :=
⟨h.collapse⟩
theorem _root_.PrincipalSeg.ordinal_type_lt {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (h : r ≺i s) : type r < type s :=
⟨h⟩
@[simp]
protected theorem zero_le (o : Ordinal) : 0 ≤ o :=
inductionOn o fun _ r _ => (InitialSeg.ofIsEmpty _ r).ordinal_type_le
instance : OrderBot Ordinal where
bot := 0
bot_le := Ordinal.zero_le
@[simp]
theorem bot_eq_zero : (⊥ : Ordinal) = 0 :=
rfl
instance instIsEmptyIioZero : IsEmpty (Iio (0 : Ordinal)) := by
simp [← bot_eq_zero]
@[simp]
protected theorem le_zero {o : Ordinal} : o ≤ 0 ↔ o = 0 :=
le_bot_iff
protected theorem pos_iff_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} : 0 < o ↔ o ≠ 0 :=
bot_lt_iff_ne_bot
protected theorem not_lt_zero (o : Ordinal) : ¬o < 0 :=
not_lt_bot
theorem eq_zero_or_pos : ∀ a : Ordinal, a = 0 ∨ 0 < a :=
eq_bot_or_bot_lt
instance : ZeroLEOneClass Ordinal :=
⟨Ordinal.zero_le _⟩
instance instNeZeroOne : NeZero (1 : Ordinal) :=
⟨Ordinal.one_ne_zero⟩
theorem type_le_iff {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type r ≤ type s ↔ Nonempty (r ≼i s) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem type_le_iff' {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type r ≤ type s ↔ Nonempty (r ↪r s) :=
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨f⟩, fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨f.collapse⟩⟩
theorem type_lt_iff {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type r < type s ↔ Nonempty (r ≺i s) :=
Iff.rfl
/-- Given two ordinals `α ≤ β`, then `initialSegToType α β` is the initial segment embedding of
`α.toType` into `β.toType`. -/
def initialSegToType {α β : Ordinal} (h : α ≤ β) : α.toType ≤i β.toType := by
apply Classical.choice (type_le_iff.mp _)
rwa [type_toType, type_toType]
/-- Given two ordinals `α < β`, then `principalSegToType α β` is the principal segment embedding
of `α.toType` into `β.toType`. -/
def principalSegToType {α β : Ordinal} (h : α < β) : α.toType <i β.toType := by
apply Classical.choice (type_lt_iff.mp _)
rwa [type_toType, type_toType]
/-! ### Enumerating elements in a well-order with ordinals -/
/-- The order type of an element inside a well order.
This is registered as a principal segment embedding into the ordinals, with top `type r`. -/
def typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : @PrincipalSeg α Ordinal.{u} r (· < ·) := by
refine ⟨RelEmbedding.ofMonotone _ fun a b ha ↦
((PrincipalSeg.ofElement r a).codRestrict _ ?_ ?_).ordinal_type_lt, type r, fun a ↦ ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨c, hc⟩
exact trans hc ha
· exact ha
· rintro ⟨b, rfl⟩
exact (PrincipalSeg.ofElement _ _).ordinal_type_lt
· refine inductionOn a ?_
rintro β s wo ⟨g⟩
exact ⟨_, g.subrelIso.ordinal_type_eq⟩
@[simp]
theorem type_subrel (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (a : α) :
type (Subrel r (r · a)) = typein r a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : (typein r).top = type r :=
rfl
theorem typein_lt_type (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (a : α) : typein r a < type r :=
(typein r).lt_top a
theorem typein_lt_self {o : Ordinal} (i : o.toType) : typein (α := o.toType) (· < ·) i < o := by
simp_rw [← type_toType o]
apply typein_lt_type
@[simp]
theorem typein_top {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≺i s) : typein s f.top = type r :=
f.subrelIso.ordinal_type_eq
@[simp]
theorem typein_lt_typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {a b : α} :
typein r a < typein r b ↔ r a b :=
(typein r).map_rel_iff
@[simp]
theorem typein_le_typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {a b : α} :
typein r a ≤ typein r b ↔ ¬r b a := by
rw [← not_lt, typein_lt_typein]
theorem typein_injective (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : Injective (typein r) :=
(typein r).injective
theorem typein_inj (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {a b} : typein r a = typein r b ↔ a = b :=
(typein_injective r).eq_iff
theorem mem_range_typein_iff (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {o} :
o ∈ Set.range (typein r) ↔ o < type r :=
(typein r).mem_range_iff_rel
theorem typein_surj (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {o} (h : o < type r) :
o ∈ Set.range (typein r) :=
(typein r).mem_range_of_rel_top h
theorem typein_surjOn (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] :
Set.SurjOn (typein r) Set.univ (Set.Iio (type r)) :=
(typein r).surjOn
/-- A well order `r` is order-isomorphic to the set of ordinals smaller than `type r`.
`enum r ⟨o, h⟩` is the `o`-th element of `α` ordered by `r`.
That is, `enum` maps an initial segment of the ordinals, those less than the order type of `r`, to
the elements of `α`. -/
@[simps! symm_apply_coe]
def enum (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : (· < · : Iio (type r) → Iio (type r) → Prop) ≃r r :=
(typein r).subrelIso
@[simp]
theorem typein_enum (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {o} (h : o < type r) :
typein r (enum r ⟨o, h⟩) = o :=
(typein r).apply_subrelIso _
theorem enum_type {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s]
(f : s ≺i r) {h : type s < type r} : enum r ⟨type s, h⟩ = f.top :=
(typein r).injective <| (typein_enum _ _).trans (typein_top _).symm
@[simp]
theorem enum_typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (a : α) :
enum r ⟨typein r a, typein_lt_type r a⟩ = a :=
enum_type (PrincipalSeg.ofElement r a)
theorem enum_lt_enum {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] {o₁ o₂ : Iio (type r)} :
r (enum r o₁) (enum r o₂) ↔ o₁ < o₂ :=
(enum _).map_rel_iff
theorem enum_le_enum (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {o₁ o₂ : Iio (type r)} :
¬r (enum r o₁) (enum r o₂) ↔ o₂ ≤ o₁ := by
rw [enum_lt_enum (r := r), not_lt]
-- TODO: generalize to other well-orders
@[simp]
theorem enum_le_enum' (a : Ordinal) {o₁ o₂ : Iio (type (· < ·))} :
enum (· < ·) o₁ ≤ enum (α := a.toType) (· < ·) o₂ ↔ o₁ ≤ o₂ := by
rw [← enum_le_enum, not_lt]
theorem enum_inj {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] {o₁ o₂ : Iio (type r)} :
enum r o₁ = enum r o₂ ↔ o₁ = o₂ :=
EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq _
theorem enum_zero_le {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] (h0 : 0 < type r) (a : α) :
¬r a (enum r ⟨0, h0⟩) := by
rw [← enum_typein r a, enum_le_enum r]
apply Ordinal.zero_le
theorem enum_zero_le' {o : Ordinal} (h0 : 0 < o) (a : o.toType) :
enum (α := o.toType) (· < ·) ⟨0, type_toType _ ▸ h0⟩ ≤ a := by
rw [← not_lt]
apply enum_zero_le
theorem relIso_enum' {α β : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≃r s) (o : Ordinal) :
∀ (hr : o < type r) (hs : o < type s), f (enum r ⟨o, hr⟩) = enum s ⟨o, hs⟩ := by
refine inductionOn o ?_; rintro γ t wo ⟨g⟩ ⟨h⟩
rw [enum_type g, enum_type (g.transRelIso f)]; rfl
theorem relIso_enum {α β : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≃r s) (o : Ordinal) (hr : o < type r) :
f (enum r ⟨o, hr⟩) = enum s ⟨o, hr.trans_eq (Quotient.sound ⟨f⟩)⟩ :=
relIso_enum' _ _ _ _
/-- The order isomorphism between ordinals less than `o` and `o.toType`. -/
@[simps! -isSimp]
noncomputable def enumIsoToType (o : Ordinal) : Set.Iio o ≃o o.toType where
toFun x := enum (α := o.toType) (· < ·) ⟨x.1, type_toType _ ▸ x.2⟩
invFun x := ⟨typein (α := o.toType) (· < ·) x, typein_lt_self x⟩
left_inv _ := Subtype.ext_val (typein_enum _ _)
right_inv _ := enum_typein _ _
map_rel_iff' := enum_le_enum' _
instance small_Iio (o : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Iio o) :=
⟨_, ⟨(enumIsoToType _).toEquiv⟩⟩
instance small_Iic (o : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Iic o) := by
rw [← Iio_union_right]
infer_instance
instance small_Ico (a b : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ico a b) := small_subset Ico_subset_Iio_self
instance small_Icc (a b : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Icc a b) := small_subset Icc_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Ioo (a b : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ioo a b) := small_subset Ioo_subset_Iio_self
instance small_Ioc (a b : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ioc a b) := small_subset Ioc_subset_Iic_self
/-- `o.toType` is an `OrderBot` whenever `o ≠ 0`. -/
def toTypeOrderBot {o : Ordinal} (ho : o ≠ 0) : OrderBot o.toType where
bot := (enum (· < ·)) ⟨0, _⟩
bot_le := enum_zero_le' (by rwa [Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero])
/-- `o.toType` is an `OrderBot` whenever `0 < o`. -/
@[deprecated "use toTypeOrderBot" (since := "2025-02-13")]
def toTypeOrderBotOfPos {o : Ordinal} (ho : 0 < o) : OrderBot o.toType where
bot := (enum (· < ·)) ⟨0, _⟩
bot_le := enum_zero_le' ho
theorem enum_zero_eq_bot {o : Ordinal} (ho : 0 < o) :
enum (α := o.toType) (· < ·) ⟨0, by rwa [type_toType]⟩ =
have H := toTypeOrderBot (o := o) (by rintro rfl; simp at ho)
(⊥ : o.toType) :=
rfl
theorem lt_wf : @WellFounded Ordinal (· < ·) :=
wellFounded_iff_wellFounded_subrel.mpr (·.induction_on fun ⟨_, _, wo⟩ ↦
RelHomClass.wellFounded (enum _) wo.wf)
instance wellFoundedRelation : WellFoundedRelation Ordinal :=
⟨(· < ·), lt_wf⟩
instance wellFoundedLT : WellFoundedLT Ordinal :=
⟨lt_wf⟩
instance : ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot Ordinal :=
WellFoundedLT.conditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot _
/-- Reformulation of well founded induction on ordinals as a lemma that works with the
`induction` tactic, as in `induction i using Ordinal.induction with | h i IH => ?_`. -/
theorem induction {p : Ordinal.{u} → Prop} (i : Ordinal.{u}) (h : ∀ j, (∀ k, k < j → p k) → p j) :
p i :=
lt_wf.induction i h
theorem typein_apply {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s]
(f : r ≼i s) (a : α) : typein s (f a) = typein r a := by
rw [← f.transPrincipal_apply _ a, (f.transPrincipal _).eq]
/-! ### Cardinality of ordinals -/
/-- The cardinal of an ordinal is the cardinality of any type on which a relation with that order
type is defined. -/
def card : Ordinal → Cardinal :=
Quotient.map WellOrder.α fun _ _ ⟨e⟩ => ⟨e.toEquiv⟩
@[simp]
theorem card_type (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : card (type r) = #α :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_typein {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] (x : α) :
#{ y // r y x } = (typein r x).card :=
rfl
theorem card_le_card {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal} : o₁ ≤ o₂ → card o₁ ≤ card o₂ :=
inductionOn o₁ fun _ _ _ => inductionOn o₂ fun _ _ _ ⟨⟨⟨f, _⟩, _⟩⟩ => ⟨f⟩
@[simp]
theorem card_zero : card 0 = 0 := mk_eq_zero _
@[simp]
theorem card_one : card 1 = 1 := mk_eq_one _
/-! ### Lifting ordinals to a higher universe -/
-- Porting note: Needed to add universe hint .{u} below
/-- The universe lift operation for ordinals, which embeds `Ordinal.{u}` as
a proper initial segment of `Ordinal.{v}` for `v > u`. For the initial segment version,
see `liftInitialSeg`. -/
@[pp_with_univ]
def lift (o : Ordinal.{v}) : Ordinal.{max v u} :=
Quotient.liftOn o (fun w => type <| ULift.down.{u} ⁻¹'o w.r) fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ =>
Quot.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans <| f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem type_uLift (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] :
type (ULift.down ⁻¹'o r) = lift.{v} (type r) :=
rfl
theorem _root_.RelIso.ordinal_lift_type_eq {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≃r s) : lift.{v} (type r) = lift.{u} (type s) :=
((RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans <|
f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).symm).ordinal_type_eq
@[simp]
theorem type_preimage {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (f : β ≃ α) :
type (f ⁻¹'o r) = type r :=
(RelIso.preimage f r).ordinal_type_eq
@[simp]
theorem type_lift_preimage (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r]
(f : β ≃ α) : lift.{u} (type (f ⁻¹'o r)) = lift.{v} (type r) :=
(RelIso.preimage f r).ordinal_lift_type_eq
/-- `lift.{max u v, u}` equals `lift.{v, u}`.
Unfortunately, the simp lemma doesn't seem to work. -/
theorem lift_umax : lift.{max u v, u} = lift.{v, u} :=
funext fun a =>
inductionOn a fun _ r _ =>
Quotient.sound ⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).symm⟩
/-- An ordinal lifted to a lower or equal universe equals itself.
Unfortunately, the simp lemma doesn't work. -/
theorem lift_id' (a : Ordinal) : lift a = a :=
inductionOn a fun _ r _ => Quotient.sound ⟨RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r⟩
/-- An ordinal lifted to the same universe equals itself. -/
@[simp]
theorem lift_id : ∀ a, lift.{u, u} a = a :=
lift_id'.{u, u}
/-- An ordinal lifted to the zero universe equals itself. -/
@[simp]
theorem lift_uzero (a : Ordinal.{u}) : lift.{0} a = a :=
lift_id' a
theorem lift_type_le {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] :
lift.{max v w} (type r) ≤ lift.{max u w} (type s) ↔ Nonempty (r ≼i s) := by
constructor <;> refine fun ⟨f⟩ ↦ ⟨?_⟩
· exact (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).symm.toInitialSeg.trans
(f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).toInitialSeg)
· exact (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).toInitialSeg.trans
(f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).symm.toInitialSeg)
theorem lift_type_eq {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] :
lift.{max v w} (type r) = lift.{max u w} (type s) ↔ Nonempty (r ≃r s) := by
refine Quotient.eq'.trans ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> refine fun ⟨f⟩ ↦ ⟨?_⟩
· exact (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).symm.trans <| f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s)
· exact (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans <| f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).symm
theorem lift_type_lt {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] :
lift.{max v w} (type r) < lift.{max u w} (type s) ↔ Nonempty (r ≺i s) := by
constructor <;> refine fun ⟨f⟩ ↦ ⟨?_⟩
· exact (f.relIsoTrans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).symm).transInitial
(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).toInitialSeg
· exact (f.relIsoTrans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r)).transInitial
(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).symm.toInitialSeg
@[simp]
theorem lift_le {a b : Ordinal} : lift.{u, v} a ≤ lift.{u, v} b ↔ a ≤ b :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun α r _ β s _ => by
rw [← lift_umax]
exact lift_type_le.{_,_,u}
@[simp]
theorem lift_inj {a b : Ordinal} : lift.{u, v} a = lift.{u, v} b ↔ a = b := by
simp_rw [le_antisymm_iff, lift_le]
@[simp]
theorem lift_lt {a b : Ordinal} : lift.{u, v} a < lift.{u, v} b ↔ a < b := by
simp_rw [lt_iff_le_not_le, lift_le]
@[simp]
theorem lift_typein_top {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≺i s) : lift.{u} (typein s f.top) = lift (type r) :=
f.subrelIso.ordinal_lift_type_eq
/-- Initial segment version of the lift operation on ordinals, embedding `Ordinal.{u}` in
`Ordinal.{v}` as an initial segment when `u ≤ v`. -/
def liftInitialSeg : Ordinal.{v} ≤i Ordinal.{max u v} := by
refine ⟨RelEmbedding.ofMonotone lift.{u} (by simp),
fun a b ↦ Ordinal.inductionOn₂ a b fun α r _ β s _ h ↦ ?_⟩
rw [RelEmbedding.ofMonotone_coe, ← lift_id'.{max u v} (type s),
← lift_umax.{v, u}, lift_type_lt] at h
obtain ⟨f⟩ := h
use typein r f.top
rw [RelEmbedding.ofMonotone_coe, ← lift_umax, lift_typein_top, lift_id']
@[simp]
theorem liftInitialSeg_coe : (liftInitialSeg.{v, u} : Ordinal → Ordinal) = lift.{v, u} :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_lift (a : Ordinal.{u}) : lift.{w} (lift.{v} a) = lift.{max v w} a :=
(liftInitialSeg.trans liftInitialSeg).eq liftInitialSeg a
@[simp]
theorem lift_zero : lift 0 = 0 :=
type_eq_zero_of_empty _
@[simp]
theorem lift_one : lift 1 = 1 :=
type_eq_one_of_unique _
@[simp]
theorem lift_card (a) : Cardinal.lift.{u, v} (card a) = card (lift.{u} a) :=
inductionOn a fun _ _ _ => rfl
theorem mem_range_lift_of_le {a : Ordinal.{u}} {b : Ordinal.{max u v}} (h : b ≤ lift.{v} a) :
b ∈ Set.range lift.{v} :=
liftInitialSeg.mem_range_of_le h
theorem le_lift_iff {a : Ordinal.{u}} {b : Ordinal.{max u v}} :
b ≤ lift.{v} a ↔ ∃ a' ≤ a, lift.{v} a' = b :=
liftInitialSeg.le_apply_iff
theorem lt_lift_iff {a : Ordinal.{u}} {b : Ordinal.{max u v}} :
b < lift.{v} a ↔ ∃ a' < a, lift.{v} a' = b :=
liftInitialSeg.lt_apply_iff
/-! ### The first infinite ordinal ω -/
/-- `ω` is the first infinite ordinal, defined as the order type of `ℕ`. -/
def omega0 : Ordinal.{u} :=
lift (typeLT ℕ)
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "ω" => Ordinal.omega0
/-- Note that the presence of this lemma makes `simp [omega0]` form a loop. -/
@[simp]
theorem type_nat_lt : typeLT ℕ = ω :=
(lift_id _).symm
@[simp]
theorem card_omega0 : card ω = ℵ₀ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_omega0 : lift ω = ω :=
lift_lift _
/-!
### Definition and first properties of addition on ordinals
In this paragraph, we introduce the addition on ordinals, and prove just enough properties to
deduce that the order on ordinals is total (and therefore well-founded). Further properties of
the addition, together with properties of the other operations, are proved in
`Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean`.
-/
/-- `o₁ + o₂` is the order on the disjoint union of `o₁` and `o₂` obtained by declaring that
every element of `o₁` is smaller than every element of `o₂`. -/
instance add : Add Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun o₁ o₂ => Quotient.liftOn₂ o₁ o₂ (fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ => type (Sum.Lex r s))
fun _ _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ => (RelIso.sumLexCongr f g).ordinal_type_eq⟩
instance addMonoidWithOne : AddMonoidWithOne Ordinal.{u} where
add := (· + ·)
zero := 0
one := 1
zero_add o :=
inductionOn o fun α _ _ =>
Eq.symm <| Quotient.sound ⟨⟨(emptySum PEmpty α).symm, Sum.lex_inr_inr⟩⟩
add_zero o :=
inductionOn o fun α _ _ =>
Eq.symm <| Quotient.sound ⟨⟨(sumEmpty α PEmpty).symm, Sum.lex_inl_inl⟩⟩
add_assoc o₁ o₂ o₃ :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ o₁ o₂ o₃ fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Quot.sound
⟨⟨sumAssoc _ _ _, by
intros a b
rcases a with (⟨a | a⟩ | a) <;> rcases b with (⟨b | b⟩ | b) <;>
simp only [sumAssoc_apply_inl_inl, sumAssoc_apply_inl_inr, sumAssoc_apply_inr,
Sum.lex_inl_inl, Sum.lex_inr_inr, Sum.Lex.sep, Sum.lex_inr_inl]⟩⟩
nsmul := nsmulRec
@[simp]
theorem card_add (o₁ o₂ : Ordinal) : card (o₁ + o₂) = card o₁ + card o₂ :=
inductionOn o₁ fun _ __ => inductionOn o₂ fun _ _ _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem type_sum_lex {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type (Sum.Lex r s) = type r + type s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_nat (n : ℕ) : card.{u} n = n := by
induction n <;> [simp; simp only [card_add, card_one, Nat.cast_succ, *]]
@[simp]
theorem card_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
card.{u} ofNat(n) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
card_nat n
instance instAddLeftMono : AddLeftMono Ordinal.{u} where
elim c a b := by
refine inductionOn₃ a b c fun α r _ β s _ γ t _ ⟨f⟩ ↦
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (Sum.recOn · Sum.inl (Sum.inr ∘ f)) ?_).ordinal_type_le
simp [f.map_rel_iff]
instance instAddRightMono : AddRightMono Ordinal.{u} where
elim c a b := by
refine inductionOn₃ a b c fun α r _ β s _ γ t _ ⟨f⟩ ↦
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (Sum.recOn · (Sum.inl ∘ f) Sum.inr) ?_).ordinal_type_le
simp [f.map_rel_iff]
theorem le_add_right (a b : Ordinal) : a ≤ a + b := by
simpa only [add_zero] using add_le_add_left (Ordinal.zero_le b) a
theorem le_add_left (a b : Ordinal) : a ≤ b + a := by
simpa only [zero_add] using add_le_add_right (Ordinal.zero_le b) a
theorem max_zero_left : ∀ a : Ordinal, max 0 a = a :=
max_bot_left
theorem max_zero_right : ∀ a : Ordinal, max a 0 = a :=
max_bot_right
@[simp]
theorem max_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} : max a b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
max_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem sInf_empty : sInf (∅ : Set Ordinal) = 0 :=
dif_neg Set.not_nonempty_empty
/-! ### Successor order properties -/
private theorem succ_le_iff' {a b : Ordinal} : a + 1 ≤ b ↔ a < b := by
refine inductionOn₂ a b fun α r _ β s _ ↦ ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> rintro ⟨f⟩
· refine ⟨((InitialSeg.leAdd _ _).trans f).toPrincipalSeg fun h ↦ ?_⟩
simpa using h (f (Sum.inr PUnit.unit))
· apply (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (Sum.recOn · f fun _ ↦ f.top) ?_).ordinal_type_le
simpa [f.map_rel_iff] using f.lt_top
instance : NoMaxOrder Ordinal :=
⟨fun _ => ⟨_, succ_le_iff'.1 le_rfl⟩⟩
instance : SuccOrder Ordinal.{u} :=
SuccOrder.ofSuccLeIff (fun o => o + 1) succ_le_iff'
instance : SuccAddOrder Ordinal := ⟨fun _ => rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_one_eq_succ (o : Ordinal) : o + 1 = succ o :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem succ_zero : succ (0 : Ordinal) = 1 :=
zero_add 1
-- Porting note: Proof used to be rfl
@[simp]
theorem succ_one : succ (1 : Ordinal) = 2 := by congr; simp only [Nat.unaryCast, zero_add]
theorem add_succ (o₁ o₂ : Ordinal) : o₁ + succ o₂ = succ (o₁ + o₂) :=
(add_assoc _ _ _).symm
theorem one_le_iff_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} : 1 ≤ o ↔ o ≠ 0 := by
rw [Order.one_le_iff_pos, Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero]
theorem succ_pos (o : Ordinal) : 0 < succ o :=
bot_lt_succ o
theorem succ_ne_zero (o : Ordinal) : succ o ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt <| succ_pos o
@[simp]
theorem lt_one_iff_zero {a : Ordinal} : a < 1 ↔ a = 0 := by
simpa using @lt_succ_bot_iff _ _ _ a _ _
theorem le_one_iff {a : Ordinal} : a ≤ 1 ↔ a = 0 ∨ a = 1 := by
simpa using @le_succ_bot_iff _ _ _ a _
@[simp]
theorem card_succ (o : Ordinal) : card (succ o) = card o + 1 := by
simp only [← add_one_eq_succ, card_add, card_one]
theorem natCast_succ (n : ℕ) : ↑n.succ = succ (n : Ordinal) :=
rfl
instance uniqueIioOne : Unique (Iio (1 : Ordinal)) where
default := ⟨0, zero_lt_one' Ordinal⟩
uniq a := Subtype.ext <| lt_one_iff_zero.1 a.2
@[simp]
theorem Iio_one_default_eq : (default : Iio (1 : Ordinal)) = ⟨0, zero_lt_one' Ordinal⟩ :=
rfl
instance uniqueToTypeOne : Unique (toType 1) where
default := enum (α := toType 1) (· < ·) ⟨0, by simp⟩
uniq a := by
rw [← enum_typein (α := toType 1) (· < ·) a]
congr
rw [← lt_one_iff_zero]
apply typein_lt_self
theorem one_toType_eq (x : toType 1) : x = enum (· < ·) ⟨0, by simp⟩ :=
Unique.eq_default x
/-! ### Extra properties of typein and enum -/
-- TODO: use `enumIsoToType` for lemmas on `toType` rather than `enum` and `typein`.
@[simp]
theorem typein_one_toType (x : toType 1) : typein (α := toType 1) (· < ·) x = 0 := by
rw [one_toType_eq x, typein_enum]
theorem typein_le_typein' (o : Ordinal) {x y : o.toType} :
typein (α := o.toType) (· < ·) x ≤ typein (α := o.toType) (· < ·) y ↔ x ≤ y := by
simp
theorem le_enum_succ {o : Ordinal} (a : (succ o).toType) :
a ≤ enum (α := (succ o).toType) (· < ·) ⟨o, (type_toType _ ▸ lt_succ o)⟩ := by
rw [← enum_typein (α := (succ o).toType) (· < ·) a, enum_le_enum', Subtype.mk_le_mk,
← lt_succ_iff]
apply typein_lt_self
/-! ### Universal ordinal -/
-- intended to be used with explicit universe parameters
/-- `univ.{u v}` is the order type of the ordinals of `Type u` as a member
of `Ordinal.{v}` (when `u < v`). It is an inaccessible cardinal. -/
@[pp_with_univ, nolint checkUnivs]
def univ : Ordinal.{max (u + 1) v} :=
lift.{v, u + 1} (typeLT Ordinal)
theorem univ_id : univ.{u, u + 1} = typeLT Ordinal :=
lift_id _
@[simp]
theorem lift_univ : lift.{w} univ.{u, v} = univ.{u, max v w} :=
lift_lift _
theorem univ_umax : univ.{u, max (u + 1) v} = univ.{u, v} :=
congr_fun lift_umax _
/-- Principal segment version of the lift operation on ordinals, embedding `Ordinal.{u}` in
`Ordinal.{v}` as a principal segment when `u < v`. -/
def liftPrincipalSeg : Ordinal.{u} <i Ordinal.{max (u + 1) v} :=
⟨↑liftInitialSeg.{max (u + 1) v, u}, univ.{u, v}, by
refine fun b => inductionOn b ?_; intro β s _
rw [univ, ← lift_umax]; constructor <;> intro h
· obtain ⟨a, e⟩ := h
rw [← e]
refine inductionOn a ?_
intro α r _
exact lift_type_lt.{u, u + 1, max (u + 1) v}.2 ⟨typein r⟩
· rw [← lift_id (type s)] at h ⊢
obtain ⟨f⟩ := lift_type_lt.{_,_,v}.1 h
obtain ⟨f, a, hf⟩ := f
exists a
revert hf
-- Porting note: apply inductionOn does not work, refine does
refine inductionOn a ?_
intro α r _ hf
refine lift_type_eq.{u, max (u + 1) v, max (u + 1) v}.2
⟨(RelIso.ofSurjective (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone ?_ ?_) ?_).symm⟩
· exact fun b => enum r ⟨f b, (hf _).1 ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩
· refine fun a b h => (typein_lt_typein r).1 ?_
rw [typein_enum, typein_enum]
exact f.map_rel_iff.2 h
· intro a'
obtain ⟨b, e⟩ := (hf _).2 (typein_lt_type _ a')
exists b
simp only [RelEmbedding.ofMonotone_coe]
simp [e]⟩
@[simp]
theorem liftPrincipalSeg_coe :
(liftPrincipalSeg.{u, v} : Ordinal → Ordinal) = lift.{max (u + 1) v} :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem liftPrincipalSeg_top : (liftPrincipalSeg.{u, v}).top = univ.{u, v} :=
rfl
theorem liftPrincipalSeg_top' : liftPrincipalSeg.{u, u + 1}.top = typeLT Ordinal := by
simp only [liftPrincipalSeg_top, univ_id]
end Ordinal
/-! ### Representing a cardinal with an ordinal -/
namespace Cardinal
open Ordinal
@[simp]
theorem mk_toType (o : Ordinal) : #o.toType = o.card :=
(Ordinal.card_type _).symm.trans <| by rw [Ordinal.type_toType]
/-- The ordinal corresponding to a cardinal `c` is the least ordinal
whose cardinal is `c`. For the order-embedding version, see `ord.order_embedding`. -/
def ord (c : Cardinal) : Ordinal :=
let F := fun α : Type u => ⨅ r : { r // IsWellOrder α r }, @type α r.1 r.2
Quot.liftOn c F
(by
suffices ∀ {α β}, α ≈ β → F α ≤ F β from
fun α β h => (this h).antisymm (this (Setoid.symm h))
rintro α β ⟨f⟩
refine le_ciInf_iff'.2 fun i => ?_
haveI := @RelEmbedding.isWellOrder _ _ (f ⁻¹'o i.1) _ (↑(RelIso.preimage f i.1)) i.2
exact
(ciInf_le' _
(Subtype.mk (f ⁻¹'o i.val)
(@RelEmbedding.isWellOrder _ _ _ _ (↑(RelIso.preimage f i.1)) i.2))).trans_eq
(Quot.sound ⟨RelIso.preimage f i.1⟩))
theorem ord_eq_Inf (α : Type u) : ord #α = ⨅ r : { r // IsWellOrder α r }, @type α r.1 r.2 :=
rfl
theorem ord_eq (α) : ∃ (r : α → α → Prop) (wo : IsWellOrder α r), ord #α = @type α r wo :=
let ⟨r, wo⟩ := ciInf_mem fun r : { r // IsWellOrder α r } => @type α r.1 r.2
⟨r.1, r.2, wo.symm⟩
theorem ord_le_type (r : α → α → Prop) [h : IsWellOrder α r] : ord #α ≤ type r :=
ciInf_le' _ (Subtype.mk r h)
theorem ord_le {c o} : ord c ≤ o ↔ c ≤ o.card :=
inductionOn c fun α =>
Ordinal.inductionOn o fun β s _ => by
let ⟨r, _, e⟩ := ord_eq α
simp only [card_type]; constructor <;> intro h
· rw [e] at h
exact
let ⟨f⟩ := h
⟨f.toEmbedding⟩
· obtain ⟨f⟩ := h
have g := RelEmbedding.preimage f s
haveI := RelEmbedding.isWellOrder g
exact le_trans (ord_le_type _) g.ordinal_type_le
theorem gc_ord_card : GaloisConnection ord card := fun _ _ => ord_le
theorem lt_ord {c o} : o < ord c ↔ o.card < c :=
gc_ord_card.lt_iff_lt
@[simp]
theorem card_ord (c) : (ord c).card = c :=
c.inductionOn fun α ↦ let ⟨r, _, e⟩ := ord_eq α; e ▸ card_type r
theorem card_surjective : Function.Surjective card :=
fun c ↦ ⟨_, card_ord c⟩
/-- Galois coinsertion between `Cardinal.ord` and `Ordinal.card`. -/
def gciOrdCard : GaloisCoinsertion ord card :=
gc_ord_card.toGaloisCoinsertion fun c => c.card_ord.le
theorem ord_card_le (o : Ordinal) : o.card.ord ≤ o :=
gc_ord_card.l_u_le _
theorem lt_ord_succ_card (o : Ordinal) : o < (succ o.card).ord :=
lt_ord.2 <| lt_succ _
theorem card_le_iff {o : Ordinal} {c : Cardinal} : o.card ≤ c ↔ o < (succ c).ord := by
rw [lt_ord, lt_succ_iff]
/--
A variation on `Cardinal.lt_ord` using `≤`: If `o` is no greater than the
initial ordinal of cardinality `c`, then its cardinal is no greater than `c`.
The converse, however, is false (for instance, `o = ω+1` and `c = ℵ₀`).
-/
lemma card_le_of_le_ord {o : Ordinal} {c : Cardinal} (ho : o ≤ c.ord) :
o.card ≤ c := by
rw [← card_ord c]; exact Ordinal.card_le_card ho
| @[mono]
theorem ord_strictMono : StrictMono ord :=
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Basic.lean | 1,082 | 1,083 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Regular.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Hom
/-!
# Action of regular elements on a module
We introduce `M`-regular elements, in the context of an `R`-module `M`. The corresponding
predicate is called `IsSMulRegular`.
There are very limited typeclass assumptions on `R` and `M`, but the "mathematical" case of interest
is a commutative ring `R` acting on a module `M`. Since the properties are "multiplicative", there
is no actual requirement of having an addition, but there is a zero in both `R` and `M`.
SMultiplications involving `0` are, of course, all trivial.
The defining property is that an element `a ∈ R` is `M`-regular if the smultiplication map
`M → M`, defined by `m ↦ a • m`, is injective.
This property is the direct generalization to modules of the property `IsLeftRegular` defined in
`Algebra/Regular`. Lemma `isLeftRegular_iff` shows that indeed the two notions
coincide.
-/
variable {R S : Type*} (M : Type*) {a b : R} {s : S}
/-- An `M`-regular element is an element `c` such that multiplication on the left by `c` is an
injective map `M → M`. -/
def IsSMulRegular [SMul R M] (c : R) :=
Function.Injective ((c • ·) : M → M)
theorem IsLeftRegular.isSMulRegular [Mul R] {c : R} (h : IsLeftRegular c) : IsSMulRegular R c :=
h
/-- Left-regular multiplication on `R` is equivalent to `R`-regularity of `R` itself. -/
theorem isLeftRegular_iff [Mul R] {a : R} : IsLeftRegular a ↔ IsSMulRegular R a :=
Iff.rfl
theorem IsRightRegular.isSMulRegular [Mul R] {c : R} (h : IsRightRegular c) :
IsSMulRegular R (MulOpposite.op c) :=
h
/-- Right-regular multiplication on `R` is equivalent to `Rᵐᵒᵖ`-regularity of `R` itself. -/
theorem isRightRegular_iff [Mul R] {a : R} :
IsRightRegular a ↔ IsSMulRegular R (MulOpposite.op a) :=
Iff.rfl
namespace IsSMulRegular
variable {M}
section SMul
variable [SMul R M] [SMul R S] [SMul S M] [IsScalarTower R S M]
/-- The product of `M`-regular elements is `M`-regular. -/
theorem smul (ra : IsSMulRegular M a) (rs : IsSMulRegular M s) : IsSMulRegular M (a • s) :=
fun _ _ ab => rs (ra ((smul_assoc _ _ _).symm.trans (ab.trans (smul_assoc _ _ _))))
/-- If an element `b` becomes `M`-regular after multiplying it on the left by an `M`-regular
element, then `b` is `M`-regular. -/
theorem of_smul (a : R) (ab : IsSMulRegular M (a • s)) : IsSMulRegular M s :=
@Function.Injective.of_comp _ _ _ (fun m : M => a • m) _ fun c d cd => by
dsimp only [Function.comp_def] at cd
rw [← smul_assoc, ← smul_assoc] at cd
exact ab cd
/-- An element is `M`-regular if and only if multiplying it on the left by an `M`-regular element
is `M`-regular. -/
@[simp]
theorem smul_iff (b : S) (ha : IsSMulRegular M a) : IsSMulRegular M (a • b) ↔ IsSMulRegular M b :=
⟨of_smul _, ha.smul⟩
theorem isLeftRegular [Mul R] {a : R} (h : IsSMulRegular R a) : IsLeftRegular a :=
h
theorem isRightRegular [Mul R] {a : R} (h : IsSMulRegular R (MulOpposite.op a)) :
IsRightRegular a :=
h
theorem mul [Mul R] [IsScalarTower R R M] (ra : IsSMulRegular M a) (rb : IsSMulRegular M b) :
IsSMulRegular M (a * b) :=
ra.smul rb
theorem of_mul [Mul R] [IsScalarTower R R M] (ab : IsSMulRegular M (a * b)) :
IsSMulRegular M b := by
rw [← smul_eq_mul] at ab
exact ab.of_smul _
@[simp]
theorem mul_iff_right [Mul R] [IsScalarTower R R M] (ha : IsSMulRegular M a) :
IsSMulRegular M (a * b) ↔ IsSMulRegular M b :=
⟨of_mul, ha.mul⟩
/-- Two elements `a` and `b` are `M`-regular if and only if both products `a * b` and `b * a`
are `M`-regular. -/
theorem mul_and_mul_iff [Mul R] [IsScalarTower R R M] :
IsSMulRegular M (a * b) ∧ IsSMulRegular M (b * a) ↔ IsSMulRegular M a ∧ IsSMulRegular M b := by
refine ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨ab, ba⟩
exact ⟨ba.of_mul, ab.of_mul⟩
· rintro ⟨ha, hb⟩
exact ⟨ha.mul hb, hb.mul ha⟩
lemma of_injective {N F} [SMul R N] [FunLike F M N] [MulActionHomClass F R M N]
(f : F) {r : R} (h1 : Function.Injective f) (h2 : IsSMulRegular N r) :
IsSMulRegular M r := fun x y h3 => h1 <| h2 <|
(map_smulₛₗ f r x).symm.trans ((congrArg f h3).trans (map_smulₛₗ f r y))
end SMul
section Monoid
variable [Monoid R] [MulAction R M]
variable (M)
/-- One is always `M`-regular. -/
@[simp]
theorem one : IsSMulRegular M (1 : R) := fun a b ab => by
dsimp only [Function.comp_def] at ab
rw [one_smul, one_smul] at ab
assumption
variable {M}
/-- An element of `R` admitting a left inverse is `M`-regular. -/
theorem of_mul_eq_one (h : a * b = 1) : IsSMulRegular M b :=
of_mul (a := a) (by rw [h]; exact one M)
/-- Any power of an `M`-regular element is `M`-regular. -/
theorem pow (n : ℕ) (ra : IsSMulRegular M a) : IsSMulRegular M (a ^ n) := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [pow_zero]; simp only [one]
| succ n hn =>
rw [pow_succ']
exact (ra.smul_iff (a ^ n)).mpr hn
/-- An element `a` is `M`-regular if and only if a positive power of `a` is `M`-regular. -/
theorem pow_iff {n : ℕ} (n0 : 0 < n) : IsSMulRegular M (a ^ n) ↔ IsSMulRegular M a := by
refine ⟨?_, pow n⟩
rw [← Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos n0, pow_succ, ← smul_eq_mul]
exact of_smul _
end Monoid
section MonoidSMul
variable [Monoid S] [SMul R M] [SMul R S] [MulAction S M] [IsScalarTower R S M]
/-- An element of `S` admitting a left inverse in `R` is `M`-regular. -/
theorem of_smul_eq_one (h : a • s = 1) : IsSMulRegular M s :=
of_smul a
(by
rw [h]
exact one M)
end MonoidSMul
section MonoidWithZero
variable [MonoidWithZero R] [Zero M] [MulActionWithZero R M]
/-- The element `0` is `M`-regular if and only if `M` is trivial. -/
protected theorem subsingleton (h : IsSMulRegular M (0 : R)) : Subsingleton M :=
⟨fun a b => h (by dsimp only [Function.comp_def]; repeat' rw [MulActionWithZero.zero_smul])⟩
/-- The element `0` is `M`-regular if and only if `M` is trivial. -/
theorem zero_iff_subsingleton : IsSMulRegular M (0 : R) ↔ Subsingleton M :=
⟨fun h => h.subsingleton, fun H a b _ => @Subsingleton.elim _ H a b⟩
/-- The `0` element is not `M`-regular, on a non-trivial module. -/
theorem not_zero_iff : ¬IsSMulRegular M (0 : R) ↔ Nontrivial M := by
rw [nontrivial_iff, not_iff_comm, zero_iff_subsingleton, subsingleton_iff]
push_neg
exact Iff.rfl
/-- The element `0` is `M`-regular when `M` is trivial. -/
theorem zero [sM : Subsingleton M] : IsSMulRegular M (0 : R) :=
zero_iff_subsingleton.mpr sM
/-- The `0` element is not `M`-regular, on a non-trivial module. -/
theorem not_zero [nM : Nontrivial M] : ¬IsSMulRegular M (0 : R) :=
not_zero_iff.mpr nM
end MonoidWithZero
section CommSemigroup
|
variable [CommSemigroup R] [SMul R M] [IsScalarTower R R M]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Regular/SMul.lean | 192 | 193 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.SMul
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.HasseDeriv
/-!
# Taylor expansions of polynomials
## Main declarations
* `Polynomial.taylor`: the Taylor expansion of the polynomial `f` at `r`
* `Polynomial.taylor_coeff`: the `k`th coefficient of `taylor r f` is
`(Polynomial.hasseDeriv k f).eval r`
* `Polynomial.eq_zero_of_hasseDeriv_eq_zero`:
the identity principle: a polynomial is 0 iff all its Hasse derivatives are zero
-/
noncomputable section
namespace Polynomial
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] (r : R) (f : R[X])
/-- The Taylor expansion of a polynomial `f` at `r`. -/
def taylor (r : R) : R[X] →ₗ[R] R[X] where
toFun f := f.comp (X + C r)
map_add' _ _ := add_comp
map_smul' c f := by simp only [smul_eq_C_mul, C_mul_comp, RingHom.id_apply]
theorem taylor_apply : taylor r f = f.comp (X + C r) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem taylor_X : taylor r X = X + C r := by simp only [taylor_apply, X_comp]
@[simp]
theorem taylor_C (x : R) : taylor r (C x) = C x := by simp only [taylor_apply, C_comp]
@[simp]
theorem taylor_zero' : taylor (0 : R) = LinearMap.id := by
ext
simp only [taylor_apply, add_zero, comp_X, map_zero, LinearMap.id_comp,
Function.comp_apply, LinearMap.coe_comp]
theorem taylor_zero (f : R[X]) : taylor 0 f = f := by rw [taylor_zero', LinearMap.id_apply]
@[simp]
theorem taylor_one : taylor r (1 : R[X]) = C 1 := by rw [← C_1, taylor_C]
@[simp]
theorem taylor_monomial (i : ℕ) (k : R) : taylor r (monomial i k) = C k * (X + C r) ^ i := by
simp [taylor_apply]
/-- The `k`th coefficient of `Polynomial.taylor r f` is `(Polynomial.hasseDeriv k f).eval r`. -/
theorem taylor_coeff (n : ℕ) : (taylor r f).coeff n = (hasseDeriv n f).eval r :=
show (lcoeff R n).comp (taylor r) f = (leval r).comp (hasseDeriv n) f by
congr 1; clear! f; ext i
simp only [leval_apply, mul_one, one_mul, eval_monomial, LinearMap.comp_apply, coeff_C_mul,
hasseDeriv_monomial, taylor_apply, monomial_comp, C_1, (commute_X (C r)).add_pow i,
map_sum]
simp only [lcoeff_apply, ← C_eq_natCast, mul_assoc, ← C_pow, ← C_mul, coeff_mul_C,
(Nat.cast_commute _ _).eq, coeff_X_pow, boole_mul, Finset.sum_ite_eq, Finset.mem_range]
split_ifs with h; · rfl
push_neg at h; rw [Nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt h, Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero]
@[simp]
theorem taylor_coeff_zero : (taylor r f).coeff 0 = f.eval r := by
rw [taylor_coeff, hasseDeriv_zero, LinearMap.id_apply]
@[simp]
theorem taylor_coeff_one : (taylor r f).coeff 1 = f.derivative.eval r := by
rw [taylor_coeff, hasseDeriv_one]
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_taylor (p : R[X]) (r : R) : natDegree (taylor r p) = natDegree p := by
refine map_natDegree_eq_natDegree _ ?_
nontriviality R
intro n c c0
simp [taylor_monomial, natDegree_C_mul_of_mul_ne_zero, natDegree_pow_X_add_C, c0]
@[simp]
theorem taylor_mul {R} [CommSemiring R] (r : R) (p q : R[X]) :
taylor r (p * q) = taylor r p * taylor r q := by simp only [taylor_apply, mul_comp]
/-- `Polynomial.taylor` as an `AlgHom` for commutative semirings -/
@[simps!]
def taylorAlgHom {R} [CommSemiring R] (r : R) : R[X] →ₐ[R] R[X] :=
AlgHom.ofLinearMap (taylor r) (taylor_one r) (taylor_mul r)
theorem taylor_taylor {R} [CommSemiring R] (f : R[X]) (r s : R) :
taylor r (taylor s f) = taylor (r + s) f := by
simp only [taylor_apply, comp_assoc, map_add, add_comp, X_comp, C_comp, C_add, add_assoc]
theorem taylor_eval {R} [CommSemiring R] (r : R) (f : R[X]) (s : R) :
(taylor r f).eval s = f.eval (s + r) := by
simp only [taylor_apply, eval_comp, eval_C, eval_X, eval_add]
theorem taylor_eval_sub {R} [CommRing R] (r : R) (f : R[X]) (s : R) :
(taylor r f).eval (s - r) = f.eval s := by rw [taylor_eval, sub_add_cancel]
theorem taylor_injective {R} [CommRing R] (r : R) : Function.Injective (taylor r) := by
intro f g h
apply_fun taylor (-r) at h
simpa only [taylor_apply, comp_assoc, add_comp, X_comp, C_comp, C_neg, neg_add_cancel_right,
comp_X] using h
theorem eq_zero_of_hasseDeriv_eq_zero {R} [CommRing R] (f : R[X]) (r : R)
(h : ∀ k, (hasseDeriv k f).eval r = 0) : f = 0 := by
apply taylor_injective r
rw [LinearMap.map_zero]
ext k
simp only [taylor_coeff, h, coeff_zero]
/-- Taylor's formula. -/
theorem sum_taylor_eq {R} [CommRing R] (f : R[X]) (r : R) :
((taylor r f).sum fun i a => C a * (X - C r) ^ i) = f := by
rw [← comp_eq_sum_left, sub_eq_add_neg, ← C_neg, ← taylor_apply, taylor_taylor, neg_add_cancel,
taylor_zero]
|
theorem eval_add_of_sq_eq_zero {A} [CommSemiring A] (p : Polynomial A) (x y : A) (hy : y ^ 2 = 0) :
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Taylor.lean | 126 | 127 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity.Basic
/-!
# Algebraic order homomorphism classes
This file defines hom classes for common properties at the intersection of order theory and algebra.
## Typeclasses
Basic typeclasses
* `NonnegHomClass`: Homs are nonnegative: `∀ f a, 0 ≤ f a`
* `SubadditiveHomClass`: Homs are subadditive: `∀ f a b, f (a + b) ≤ f a + f b`
* `SubmultiplicativeHomClass`: Homs are submultiplicative: `∀ f a b, f (a * b) ≤ f a * f b`
* `MulLEAddHomClass`: `∀ f a b, f (a * b) ≤ f a + f b`
* `NonarchimedeanHomClass`: `∀ a b, f (a + b) ≤ max (f a) (f b)`
Group norms
* `AddGroupSeminormClass`: Homs are nonnegative, subadditive, even and preserve zero.
* `GroupSeminormClass`: Homs are nonnegative, respect `f (a * b) ≤ f a + f b`, `f a⁻¹ = f a` and
preserve zero.
* `AddGroupNormClass`: Homs are seminorms such that `f x = 0 → x = 0` for all `x`.
* `GroupNormClass`: Homs are seminorms such that `f x = 0 → x = 1` for all `x`.
Ring norms
* `RingSeminormClass`: Homs are submultiplicative group norms.
* `RingNormClass`: Homs are ring seminorms that are also additive group norms.
* `MulRingSeminormClass`: Homs are ring seminorms that are multiplicative.
* `MulRingNormClass`: Homs are ring norms that are multiplicative.
## Notes
Typeclasses for seminorms are defined here while types of seminorms are defined in
`Analysis.Normed.Group.Seminorm` and `Analysis.Normed.Ring.Seminorm` because absolute values are
multiplicative ring norms but outside of this use we only consider real-valued seminorms.
## TODO
Finitary versions of the current lemmas.
-/
library_note "out-param inheritance"/--
Diamond inheritance cannot depend on `outParam`s in the following circumstances:
* there are three classes `Top`, `Middle`, `Bottom`
* all of these classes have a parameter `(α : outParam _)`
* all of these classes have an instance parameter `[Root α]` that depends on this `outParam`
* the `Root` class has two child classes: `Left` and `Right`, these are siblings in the hierarchy
* the instance `Bottom.toMiddle` takes a `[Left α]` parameter
* the instance `Middle.toTop` takes a `[Right α]` parameter
* there is a `Leaf` class that inherits from both `Left` and `Right`.
In that case, given instances `Bottom α` and `Leaf α`, Lean cannot synthesize a `Top α` instance,
even though the hypotheses of the instances `Bottom.toMiddle` and `Middle.toTop` are satisfied.
There are two workarounds:
* You could replace the bundled inheritance implemented by the instance `Middle.toTop` with
unbundled inheritance implemented by adding a `[Top α]` parameter to the `Middle` class. This is
the preferred option since it is also more compatible with Lean 4, at the cost of being more work
to implement and more verbose to use.
* You could weaken the `Bottom.toMiddle` instance by making it depend on a subclass of
`Middle.toTop`'s parameter, in this example replacing `[Left α]` with `[Leaf α]`.
-/
open Function
variable {ι F α β γ δ : Type*}
/-! ### Basics -/
/-- `NonnegHomClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of nonnegative morphisms. -/
class NonnegHomClass (F : Type*) (α β : outParam Type*) [Zero β] [LE β] [FunLike F α β] : Prop where
/-- the image of any element is non negative. -/
apply_nonneg (f : F) : ∀ a, 0 ≤ f a
/-- `SubadditiveHomClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of subadditive morphisms. -/
class SubadditiveHomClass (F : Type*) (α β : outParam Type*)
[Add α] [Add β] [LE β] [FunLike F α β] : Prop where
/-- the image of a sum is less or equal than the sum of the images. -/
map_add_le_add (f : F) : ∀ a b, f (a + b) ≤ f a + f b
/-- `SubmultiplicativeHomClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of submultiplicative morphisms. -/
@[to_additive SubadditiveHomClass]
class SubmultiplicativeHomClass (F : Type*) (α β : outParam (Type*)) [Mul α] [Mul β] [LE β]
[FunLike F α β] : Prop where
/-- the image of a product is less or equal than the product of the images. -/
map_mul_le_mul (f : F) : ∀ a b, f (a * b) ≤ f a * f b
/-- `MulLEAddHomClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of subadditive morphisms. -/
@[to_additive SubadditiveHomClass]
class MulLEAddHomClass (F : Type*) (α β : outParam Type*) [Mul α] [Add β] [LE β] [FunLike F α β] :
Prop where
/-- the image of a product is less or equal than the sum of the images. -/
map_mul_le_add (f : F) : ∀ a b, f (a * b) ≤ f a + f b
/-- `NonarchimedeanHomClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of non-archimedean morphisms. -/
class NonarchimedeanHomClass (F : Type*) (α β : outParam Type*)
[Add α] [LinearOrder β] [FunLike F α β] : Prop where
/-- the image of a sum is less or equal than the maximum of the images. -/
map_add_le_max (f : F) : ∀ a b, f (a + b) ≤ max (f a) (f b)
export NonnegHomClass (apply_nonneg)
export SubadditiveHomClass (map_add_le_add)
export SubmultiplicativeHomClass (map_mul_le_mul)
export MulLEAddHomClass (map_mul_le_add)
export NonarchimedeanHomClass (map_add_le_max)
attribute [simp] apply_nonneg
variable [FunLike F α β]
@[to_additive]
theorem le_map_mul_map_div [Group α] [CommMagma β] [LE β] [SubmultiplicativeHomClass F α β]
(f : F) (a b : α) : f a ≤ f b * f (a / b) := by
simpa only [mul_comm, div_mul_cancel] using map_mul_le_mul f (a / b) b
@[to_additive existing]
theorem le_map_add_map_div [Group α] [AddCommMagma β] [LE β] [MulLEAddHomClass F α β] (f : F)
(a b : α) : f a ≤ f b + f (a / b) := by
simpa only [add_comm, div_mul_cancel] using map_mul_le_add f (a / b) b
@[to_additive]
theorem le_map_div_mul_map_div [Group α] [Mul β] [LE β] [SubmultiplicativeHomClass F α β]
(f : F) (a b c : α) : f (a / c) ≤ f (a / b) * f (b / c) := by
simpa only [div_mul_div_cancel] using map_mul_le_mul f (a / b) (b / c)
@[to_additive existing]
theorem le_map_div_add_map_div [Group α] [Add β] [LE β] [MulLEAddHomClass F α β]
(f : F) (a b c : α) : f (a / c) ≤ f (a / b) + f (b / c) := by
simpa only [div_mul_div_cancel] using map_mul_le_add f (a / b) (b / c)
|
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Hom/Basic.lean | 139 | 141 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Sum
import Mathlib.Topology.Homeomorph.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Antilipschitz
/-!
# Isometries
We define isometries, i.e., maps between emetric spaces that preserve
the edistance (on metric spaces, these are exactly the maps that preserve distances),
and prove their basic properties. We also introduce isometric bijections.
Since a lot of elementary properties don't require `eq_of_dist_eq_zero` we start setting up the
theory for `PseudoMetricSpace` and we specialize to `MetricSpace` when needed.
-/
open Topology
noncomputable section
universe u v w
variable {ι : Type*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
open Function Set
open scoped Topology ENNReal
/-- An isometry (also known as isometric embedding) is a map preserving the edistance
between pseudoemetric spaces, or equivalently the distance between pseudometric space. -/
def Isometry [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] (f : α → β) : Prop :=
∀ x1 x2 : α, edist (f x1) (f x2) = edist x1 x2
/-- On pseudometric spaces, a map is an isometry if and only if it preserves nonnegative
distances. -/
theorem isometry_iff_nndist_eq [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
Isometry f ↔ ∀ x y, nndist (f x) (f y) = nndist x y := by
simp only [Isometry, edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_inj]
/-- On pseudometric spaces, a map is an isometry if and only if it preserves distances. -/
theorem isometry_iff_dist_eq [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
Isometry f ↔ ∀ x y, dist (f x) (f y) = dist x y := by
simp only [isometry_iff_nndist_eq, ← coe_nndist, NNReal.coe_inj]
/-- An isometry preserves distances. -/
alias ⟨Isometry.dist_eq, _⟩ := isometry_iff_dist_eq
/-- A map that preserves distances is an isometry -/
alias ⟨_, Isometry.of_dist_eq⟩ := isometry_iff_dist_eq
/-- An isometry preserves non-negative distances. -/
alias ⟨Isometry.nndist_eq, _⟩ := isometry_iff_nndist_eq
/-- A map that preserves non-negative distances is an isometry. -/
alias ⟨_, Isometry.of_nndist_eq⟩ := isometry_iff_nndist_eq
namespace Isometry
section PseudoEmetricIsometry
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] [PseudoEMetricSpace γ]
variable {f : α → β} {x : α}
/-- An isometry preserves edistances. -/
theorem edist_eq (hf : Isometry f) (x y : α) : edist (f x) (f y) = edist x y :=
hf x y
theorem lipschitz (h : Isometry f) : LipschitzWith 1 f :=
LipschitzWith.of_edist_le fun x y => (h x y).le
theorem antilipschitz (h : Isometry f) : AntilipschitzWith 1 f := fun x y => by
simp only [h x y, ENNReal.coe_one, one_mul, le_refl]
/-- Any map on a subsingleton is an isometry -/
@[nontriviality]
theorem _root_.isometry_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] : Isometry f := fun x y => by
rw [Subsingleton.elim x y]; simp
/-- The identity is an isometry -/
theorem _root_.isometry_id : Isometry (id : α → α) := fun _ _ => rfl
theorem prodMap {δ} [PseudoEMetricSpace δ] {f : α → β} {g : γ → δ} (hf : Isometry f)
(hg : Isometry g) : Isometry (Prod.map f g) := fun x y => by
simp only [Prod.edist_eq, Prod.map_fst, hf.edist_eq, Prod.map_snd, hg.edist_eq]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-18")]
alias prod_map := prodMap
protected theorem piMap {ι} [Fintype ι] {α β : ι → Type*} [∀ i, PseudoEMetricSpace (α i)]
[∀ i, PseudoEMetricSpace (β i)] (f : ∀ i, α i → β i) (hf : ∀ i, Isometry (f i)) :
Isometry (Pi.map f) := fun x y => by
simp only [edist_pi_def, (hf _).edist_eq, Pi.map_apply]
/-- The composition of isometries is an isometry. -/
theorem comp {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} (hg : Isometry g) (hf : Isometry f) : Isometry (g ∘ f) :=
fun _ _ => (hg _ _).trans (hf _ _)
/-- An isometry from a metric space is a uniform continuous map -/
protected theorem uniformContinuous (hf : Isometry f) : UniformContinuous f :=
hf.lipschitz.uniformContinuous
/-- An isometry from a metric space is a uniform inducing map -/
theorem isUniformInducing (hf : Isometry f) : IsUniformInducing f :=
hf.antilipschitz.isUniformInducing hf.uniformContinuous
theorem tendsto_nhds_iff {ι : Type*} {f : α → β} {g : ι → α} {a : Filter ι} {b : α}
(hf : Isometry f) : Filter.Tendsto g a (𝓝 b) ↔ Filter.Tendsto (f ∘ g) a (𝓝 (f b)) :=
hf.isUniformInducing.isInducing.tendsto_nhds_iff
/-- An isometry is continuous. -/
protected theorem continuous (hf : Isometry f) : Continuous f :=
hf.lipschitz.continuous
/-- The right inverse of an isometry is an isometry. -/
theorem right_inv {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : Isometry f) (hg : RightInverse g f) : Isometry g :=
fun x y => by rw [← h, hg _, hg _]
theorem preimage_emetric_closedBall (h : Isometry f) (x : α) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
f ⁻¹' EMetric.closedBall (f x) r = EMetric.closedBall x r := by
ext y
simp [h.edist_eq]
theorem preimage_emetric_ball (h : Isometry f) (x : α) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
f ⁻¹' EMetric.ball (f x) r = EMetric.ball x r := by
ext y
simp [h.edist_eq]
/-- Isometries preserve the diameter in pseudoemetric spaces. -/
theorem ediam_image (hf : Isometry f) (s : Set α) : EMetric.diam (f '' s) = EMetric.diam s :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by simp only [EMetric.diam_le_iff, forall_mem_image, hf.edist_eq]
theorem ediam_range (hf : Isometry f) : EMetric.diam (range f) = EMetric.diam (univ : Set α) := by
rw [← image_univ]
exact hf.ediam_image univ
theorem mapsTo_emetric_ball (hf : Isometry f) (x : α) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
MapsTo f (EMetric.ball x r) (EMetric.ball (f x) r) :=
(hf.preimage_emetric_ball x r).ge
theorem mapsTo_emetric_closedBall (hf : Isometry f) (x : α) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
MapsTo f (EMetric.closedBall x r) (EMetric.closedBall (f x) r) :=
(hf.preimage_emetric_closedBall x r).ge
/-- The injection from a subtype is an isometry -/
theorem _root_.isometry_subtype_coe {s : Set α} : Isometry ((↑) : s → α) := fun _ _ => rfl
theorem comp_continuousOn_iff {γ} [TopologicalSpace γ] (hf : Isometry f) {g : γ → α} {s : Set γ} :
ContinuousOn (f ∘ g) s ↔ ContinuousOn g s :=
hf.isUniformInducing.isInducing.continuousOn_iff.symm
theorem comp_continuous_iff {γ} [TopologicalSpace γ] (hf : Isometry f) {g : γ → α} :
Continuous (f ∘ g) ↔ Continuous g :=
hf.isUniformInducing.isInducing.continuous_iff.symm
end PseudoEmetricIsometry
--section
section EmetricIsometry
variable [EMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : α → β}
/-- An isometry from an emetric space is injective -/
protected theorem injective (h : Isometry f) : Injective f :=
h.antilipschitz.injective
/-- An isometry from an emetric space is a uniform embedding -/
lemma isUniformEmbedding (hf : Isometry f) : IsUniformEmbedding f :=
hf.antilipschitz.isUniformEmbedding hf.lipschitz.uniformContinuous
/-- An isometry from an emetric space is an embedding -/
theorem isEmbedding (hf : Isometry f) : IsEmbedding f := hf.isUniformEmbedding.isEmbedding
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-26")]
alias embedding := isEmbedding
/-- An isometry from a complete emetric space is a closed embedding -/
theorem isClosedEmbedding [CompleteSpace α] [EMetricSpace γ] {f : α → γ} (hf : Isometry f) :
IsClosedEmbedding f :=
hf.antilipschitz.isClosedEmbedding hf.lipschitz.uniformContinuous
end EmetricIsometry
--section
section PseudoMetricIsometry
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β}
/-- An isometry preserves the diameter in pseudometric spaces. -/
theorem diam_image (hf : Isometry f) (s : Set α) : Metric.diam (f '' s) = Metric.diam s := by
rw [Metric.diam, Metric.diam, hf.ediam_image]
theorem diam_range (hf : Isometry f) : Metric.diam (range f) = Metric.diam (univ : Set α) := by
rw [← image_univ]
exact hf.diam_image univ
theorem preimage_setOf_dist (hf : Isometry f) (x : α) (p : ℝ → Prop) :
f ⁻¹' { y | p (dist y (f x)) } = { y | p (dist y x) } := by
ext y
simp [hf.dist_eq]
theorem preimage_closedBall (hf : Isometry f) (x : α) (r : ℝ) :
f ⁻¹' Metric.closedBall (f x) r = Metric.closedBall x r :=
hf.preimage_setOf_dist x (· ≤ r)
theorem preimage_ball (hf : Isometry f) (x : α) (r : ℝ) :
f ⁻¹' Metric.ball (f x) r = Metric.ball x r :=
hf.preimage_setOf_dist x (· < r)
theorem preimage_sphere (hf : Isometry f) (x : α) (r : ℝ) :
f ⁻¹' Metric.sphere (f x) r = Metric.sphere x r :=
hf.preimage_setOf_dist x (· = r)
theorem mapsTo_ball (hf : Isometry f) (x : α) (r : ℝ) :
MapsTo f (Metric.ball x r) (Metric.ball (f x) r) :=
(hf.preimage_ball x r).ge
theorem mapsTo_sphere (hf : Isometry f) (x : α) (r : ℝ) :
MapsTo f (Metric.sphere x r) (Metric.sphere (f x) r) :=
(hf.preimage_sphere x r).ge
theorem mapsTo_closedBall (hf : Isometry f) (x : α) (r : ℝ) :
MapsTo f (Metric.closedBall x r) (Metric.closedBall (f x) r) :=
(hf.preimage_closedBall x r).ge
|
end PseudoMetricIsometry
-- section
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Isometry.lean | 229 | 232 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Frédéric Marbach. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Frédéric Marbach
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Abelian
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Derivation.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.OfAssociative
/-!
# Adjoint action of a Lie algebra on itself
This file defines the *adjoint action* of a Lie algebra on itself, and establishes basic properties.
## Main definitions
- `LieDerivation.ad`: The adjoint action of a Lie algebra `L` on itself, seen as a morphism of Lie
algebras from `L` to the Lie algebra of its derivations. The adjoint action is also defined in the
`Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.OfAssociative.lean` file, under the name `LieAlgebra.ad`, as the morphism with
values in the endormophisms of `L`.
## Main statements
- `LieDerivation.coe_ad_apply_eq_ad_apply`: when seen as endomorphisms, both definitions coincide,
- `LieDerivation.ad_ker_eq_center`: the kernel of the adjoint action is the center of `L`,
- `LieDerivation.lie_der_ad_eq_ad_der`: the commutator of a derivation `D` and `ad x` is `ad (D x)`,
- `LieDerivation.ad_isIdealMorphism`: the range of the adjoint action is an ideal of the
derivations.
-/
namespace LieDerivation
section AdjointAction
variable (R L : Type*) [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R L]
/-- The adjoint action of a Lie algebra `L` on itself, seen as a morphism of Lie algebras from
`L` to its derivations.
Note the minus sign: this is chosen to so that `ad ⁅x, y⁆ = ⁅ad x, ad y⁆`. -/
@[simps!]
def ad : L →ₗ⁅R⁆ LieDerivation R L L :=
{ __ := - inner R L L
map_lie' := by
intro x y
ext z
simp only [AddHom.toFun_eq_coe, LinearMap.coe_toAddHom, LinearMap.neg_apply, coe_neg,
Pi.neg_apply, inner_apply_apply, commutator_apply]
rw [leibniz_lie, neg_lie, neg_lie, ← lie_skew x]
abel }
variable {R L}
/-- The definitions `LieDerivation.ad` and `LieAlgebra.ad` agree. -/
@[simp] lemma coe_ad_apply_eq_ad_apply (x : L) : ad R L x = LieAlgebra.ad R L x := by ext; simp
lemma ad_apply_lieDerivation (x : L) (D : LieDerivation R L L) : ad R L (D x) = - ⁅x, D⁆ := rfl
lemma lie_ad (x : L) (D : LieDerivation R L L) : ⁅ad R L x, D⁆ = ⁅x, D⁆ := by ext; simp
variable (R L) in
/-- The kernel of the adjoint action on a Lie algebra is equal to its center. -/
lemma ad_ker_eq_center : (ad R L).ker = LieAlgebra.center R L := by
ext x
rw [← LieAlgebra.self_module_ker_eq_center, LieHom.mem_ker, LieModule.mem_ker]
simp [DFunLike.ext_iff]
| /-- If the center of a Lie algebra is trivial, then the adjoint action is injective. -/
lemma injective_ad_of_center_eq_bot (h : LieAlgebra.center R L = ⊥) :
Function.Injective (ad R L) := by
rw [← LieHom.ker_eq_bot, ad_ker_eq_center, h]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/Derivation/AdjointAction.lean | 67 | 70 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Reid Barton, Mario Carneiro, Kim Morrison, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Category.ULift
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EssentiallySmall
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.EpiMono
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Basic
/-!
# Existence of limits and colimits
In `CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit` we defined `IsLimit c`,
the data showing that a cone `c` is a limit cone.
The two main structures defined in this file are:
* `LimitCone F`, which consists of a choice of cone for `F` and the fact it is a limit cone, and
* `HasLimit F`, asserting the mere existence of some limit cone for `F`.
`HasLimit` is a propositional typeclass
(it's important that it is a proposition merely asserting the existence of a limit,
as otherwise we would have non-defeq problems from incompatible instances).
While `HasLimit` only asserts the existence of a limit cone,
we happily use the axiom of choice in mathlib,
so there are convenience functions all depending on `HasLimit F`:
* `limit F : C`, producing some limit object (of course all such are isomorphic)
* `limit.π F j : limit F ⟶ F.obj j`, the morphisms out of the limit,
* `limit.lift F c : c.pt ⟶ limit F`, the universal morphism from any other `c : Cone F`, etc.
Key to using the `HasLimit` interface is that there is an `@[ext]` lemma stating that
to check `f = g`, for `f g : Z ⟶ limit F`, it suffices to check `f ≫ limit.π F j = g ≫ limit.π F j`
for every `j`.
This, combined with `@[simp]` lemmas, makes it possible to prove many easy facts about limits using
automation (e.g. `tidy`).
There are abbreviations `HasLimitsOfShape J C` and `HasLimits C`
asserting the existence of classes of limits.
Later more are introduced, for finite limits, special shapes of limits, etc.
Ideally, many results about limits should be stated first in terms of `IsLimit`,
and then a result in terms of `HasLimit` derived from this.
At this point, however, this is far from uniformly achieved in mathlib ---
often statements are only written in terms of `HasLimit`.
## Implementation
At present we simply say everything twice, in order to handle both limits and colimits.
It would be highly desirable to have some automation support,
e.g. a `@[dualize]` attribute that behaves similarly to `@[to_additive]`.
## References
* [Stacks: Limits and colimits](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/002D)
-/
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Functor Opposite
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
-- morphism levels before object levels. See note [CategoryTheory universes].
universe v₁ u₁ v₂ u₂ v₃ u₃ v v' v'' u u' u''
variable {J : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J] {K : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} K]
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable {F : J ⥤ C}
section Limit
/-- `LimitCone F` contains a cone over `F` together with the information that it is a limit. -/
structure LimitCone (F : J ⥤ C) where
/-- The cone itself -/
cone : Cone F
/-- The proof that is the limit cone -/
isLimit : IsLimit cone
/-- `HasLimit F` represents the mere existence of a limit for `F`. -/
class HasLimit (F : J ⥤ C) : Prop where mk' ::
/-- There is some limit cone for `F` -/
exists_limit : Nonempty (LimitCone F)
theorem HasLimit.mk {F : J ⥤ C} (d : LimitCone F) : HasLimit F :=
⟨Nonempty.intro d⟩
/-- Use the axiom of choice to extract explicit `LimitCone F` from `HasLimit F`. -/
def getLimitCone (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] : LimitCone F :=
Classical.choice <| HasLimit.exists_limit
variable (J C)
/-- `C` has limits of shape `J` if there exists a limit for every functor `F : J ⥤ C`. -/
class HasLimitsOfShape : Prop where
/-- All functors `F : J ⥤ C` from `J` have limits -/
has_limit : ∀ F : J ⥤ C, HasLimit F := by infer_instance
/-- `C` has all limits of size `v₁ u₁` (`HasLimitsOfSize.{v₁ u₁} C`)
if it has limits of every shape `J : Type u₁` with `[Category.{v₁} J]`.
-/
@[pp_with_univ]
class HasLimitsOfSize (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] : Prop where
/-- All functors `F : J ⥤ C` from all small `J` have limits -/
has_limits_of_shape : ∀ (J : Type u₁) [Category.{v₁} J], HasLimitsOfShape J C := by
infer_instance
/-- `C` has all (small) limits if it has limits of every shape that is as big as its hom-sets. -/
abbrev HasLimits (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] : Prop :=
HasLimitsOfSize.{v, v} C
theorem HasLimits.has_limits_of_shape {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [HasLimits C] (J : Type v)
[Category.{v} J] : HasLimitsOfShape J C :=
HasLimitsOfSize.has_limits_of_shape J
variable {J C}
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) hasLimitOfHasLimitsOfShape {J : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J]
[HasLimitsOfShape J C] (F : J ⥤ C) : HasLimit F :=
HasLimitsOfShape.has_limit F
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) hasLimitsOfShapeOfHasLimits {J : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J]
[HasLimitsOfSize.{v₁, u₁} C] : HasLimitsOfShape J C :=
HasLimitsOfSize.has_limits_of_shape J
-- Interface to the `HasLimit` class.
/-- An arbitrary choice of limit cone for a functor. -/
def limit.cone (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] : Cone F :=
(getLimitCone F).cone
/-- An arbitrary choice of limit object of a functor. -/
def limit (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] :=
(limit.cone F).pt
/-- The projection from the limit object to a value of the functor. -/
def limit.π (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] (j : J) : limit F ⟶ F.obj j :=
(limit.cone F).π.app j
@[reassoc]
theorem limit.π_comp_eqToHom (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] {j j' : J} (hj : j = j') :
limit.π F j ≫ eqToHom (by subst hj; rfl) = limit.π F j' := by
subst hj
simp
@[simp]
theorem limit.cone_x {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] : (limit.cone F).pt = limit F :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem limit.cone_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] : (limit.cone F).π.app = limit.π _ :=
rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.w (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] {j j' : J} (f : j ⟶ j') :
limit.π F j ≫ F.map f = limit.π F j' :=
(limit.cone F).w f
/-- Evidence that the arbitrary choice of cone provided by `limit.cone F` is a limit cone. -/
def limit.isLimit (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] : IsLimit (limit.cone F) :=
(getLimitCone F).isLimit
/-- The morphism from the cone point of any other cone to the limit object. -/
def limit.lift (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) : c.pt ⟶ limit F :=
(limit.isLimit F).lift c
@[simp]
theorem limit.isLimit_lift {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) :
(limit.isLimit F).lift c = limit.lift F c :=
rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.lift_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) (j : J) :
limit.lift F c ≫ limit.π F j = c.π.app j :=
IsLimit.fac _ c j
/-- Functoriality of limits.
Usually this morphism should be accessed through `lim.map`,
but may be needed separately when you have specified limits for the source and target functors,
but not necessarily for all functors of shape `J`.
-/
def limMap {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (α : F ⟶ G) : limit F ⟶ limit G :=
IsLimit.map _ (limit.isLimit G) α
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limMap_π {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (α : F ⟶ G) (j : J) :
limMap α ≫ limit.π G j = limit.π F j ≫ α.app j :=
limit.lift_π _ j
/-- The cone morphism from any cone to the arbitrary choice of limit cone. -/
def limit.coneMorphism {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) : c ⟶ limit.cone F :=
(limit.isLimit F).liftConeMorphism c
@[simp]
theorem limit.coneMorphism_hom {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) :
(limit.coneMorphism c).hom = limit.lift F c :=
rfl
theorem limit.coneMorphism_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) (j : J) :
(limit.coneMorphism c).hom ≫ limit.π F j = c.π.app j := by simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_hom_comp {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {c : Cone F} (hc : IsLimit c)
(j : J) : (IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso hc (limit.isLimit _)).hom ≫ limit.π F j = c.π.app j :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_hom_comp _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {c : Cone F} (hc : IsLimit c)
(j : J) : (IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (limit.isLimit _) hc).inv ≫ limit.π F j = c.π.app j :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp _ _ _
theorem limit.existsUnique {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (t : Cone F) :
∃! l : t.pt ⟶ limit F, ∀ j, l ≫ limit.π F j = t.π.app j :=
(limit.isLimit F).existsUnique _
/-- Given any other limit cone for `F`, the chosen `limit F` is isomorphic to the cone point.
-/
def limit.isoLimitCone {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (t : LimitCone F) : limit F ≅ t.cone.pt :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (limit.isLimit F) t.isLimit
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.isoLimitCone_hom_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (t : LimitCone F) (j : J) :
(limit.isoLimitCone t).hom ≫ t.cone.π.app j = limit.π F j := by
dsimp [limit.isoLimitCone, IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso]
simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.isoLimitCone_inv_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (t : LimitCone F) (j : J) :
(limit.isoLimitCone t).inv ≫ limit.π F j = t.cone.π.app j := by
dsimp [limit.isoLimitCone, IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso]
simp
@[ext]
theorem limit.hom_ext {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {X : C} {f f' : X ⟶ limit F}
(w : ∀ j, f ≫ limit.π F j = f' ≫ limit.π F j) : f = f' :=
(limit.isLimit F).hom_ext w
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.lift_map {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (c : Cone F) (α : F ⟶ G) :
limit.lift F c ≫ limMap α = limit.lift G ((Cones.postcompose α).obj c) := by
ext
rw [assoc, limMap_π, limit.lift_π_assoc, limit.lift_π]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem limit.lift_cone {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] : limit.lift F (limit.cone F) = 𝟙 (limit F) :=
(limit.isLimit _).lift_self
/-- The isomorphism (in `Type`) between
morphisms from a specified object `W` to the limit object,
and cones with cone point `W`.
-/
def limit.homIso (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] (W : C) :
ULift.{u₁} (W ⟶ limit F : Type v) ≅ F.cones.obj (op W) :=
(limit.isLimit F).homIso W
@[simp]
theorem limit.homIso_hom (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] {W : C} (f : ULift (W ⟶ limit F)) :
(limit.homIso F W).hom f = (const J).map f.down ≫ (limit.cone F).π :=
(limit.isLimit F).homIso_hom f
/-- The isomorphism (in `Type`) between
morphisms from a specified object `W` to the limit object,
and an explicit componentwise description of cones with cone point `W`.
-/
def limit.homIso' (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] (W : C) :
ULift.{u₁} (W ⟶ limit F : Type v) ≅
{ p : ∀ j, W ⟶ F.obj j // ∀ {j j' : J} (f : j ⟶ j'), p j ≫ F.map f = p j' } :=
(limit.isLimit F).homIso' W
theorem limit.lift_extend {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) {X : C} (f : X ⟶ c.pt) :
limit.lift F (c.extend f) = f ≫ limit.lift F c := by aesop_cat
/-- If a functor `F` has a limit, so does any naturally isomorphic functor.
-/
theorem hasLimit_of_iso {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (α : F ≅ G) : HasLimit G :=
HasLimit.mk
{ cone := (Cones.postcompose α.hom).obj (limit.cone F)
isLimit := (IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv _ _).symm (limit.isLimit F) }
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-03")] alias hasLimitOfIso := hasLimit_of_iso
theorem hasLimit_iff_of_iso {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ≅ G) : HasLimit F ↔ HasLimit G :=
⟨fun _ ↦ hasLimit_of_iso α, fun _ ↦ hasLimit_of_iso α.symm⟩
-- See the construction of limits from products and equalizers
-- for an example usage.
/-- If a functor `G` has the same collection of cones as a functor `F`
which has a limit, then `G` also has a limit. -/
theorem HasLimit.ofConesIso {J K : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J] [Category.{v₂} K] (F : J ⥤ C)
(G : K ⥤ C) (h : F.cones ≅ G.cones) [HasLimit F] : HasLimit G :=
HasLimit.mk ⟨_, IsLimit.ofNatIso (IsLimit.natIso (limit.isLimit F) ≪≫ h)⟩
/-- The limits of `F : J ⥤ C` and `G : J ⥤ C` are isomorphic,
if the functors are naturally isomorphic.
-/
def HasLimit.isoOfNatIso {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (w : F ≅ G) : limit F ≅ limit G :=
IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfNatIso (limit.isLimit F) (limit.isLimit G) w
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem HasLimit.isoOfNatIso_hom_π {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (w : F ≅ G) (j : J) :
(HasLimit.isoOfNatIso w).hom ≫ limit.π G j = limit.π F j ≫ w.hom.app j :=
IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfNatIso_hom_comp _ _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem HasLimit.isoOfNatIso_inv_π {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (w : F ≅ G) (j : J) :
(HasLimit.isoOfNatIso w).inv ≫ limit.π F j = limit.π G j ≫ w.inv.app j :=
IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfNatIso_inv_comp _ _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem HasLimit.lift_isoOfNatIso_hom {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (t : Cone F)
(w : F ≅ G) :
limit.lift F t ≫ (HasLimit.isoOfNatIso w).hom =
limit.lift G ((Cones.postcompose w.hom).obj _) :=
IsLimit.lift_comp_conePointsIsoOfNatIso_hom _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem HasLimit.lift_isoOfNatIso_inv {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (t : Cone G)
(w : F ≅ G) :
limit.lift G t ≫ (HasLimit.isoOfNatIso w).inv =
limit.lift F ((Cones.postcompose w.inv).obj _) :=
IsLimit.lift_comp_conePointsIsoOfNatIso_inv _ _ _
/-- The limits of `F : J ⥤ C` and `G : K ⥤ C` are isomorphic,
if there is an equivalence `e : J ≌ K` making the triangle commute up to natural isomorphism.
-/
def HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {G : K ⥤ C} [HasLimit G] (e : J ≌ K)
(w : e.functor ⋙ G ≅ F) : limit F ≅ limit G :=
IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfEquivalence (limit.isLimit F) (limit.isLimit G) e w
@[simp]
theorem HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence_hom_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {G : K ⥤ C} [HasLimit G]
(e : J ≌ K) (w : e.functor ⋙ G ≅ F) (k : K) :
(HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence e w).hom ≫ limit.π G k =
limit.π F (e.inverse.obj k) ≫ w.inv.app (e.inverse.obj k) ≫ G.map (e.counit.app k) := by
simp only [HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence, IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfEquivalence_hom]
dsimp
simp
@[simp]
theorem HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence_inv_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {G : K ⥤ C} [HasLimit G]
(e : J ≌ K) (w : e.functor ⋙ G ≅ F) (j : J) :
(HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence e w).inv ≫ limit.π F j =
limit.π G (e.functor.obj j) ≫ w.hom.app j := by
simp only [HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence, IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfEquivalence_hom]
dsimp
simp
section Pre
variable (F)
variable [HasLimit F] (E : K ⥤ J) [HasLimit (E ⋙ F)]
/-- The canonical morphism from the limit of `F` to the limit of `E ⋙ F`.
-/
def limit.pre : limit F ⟶ limit (E ⋙ F) :=
limit.lift (E ⋙ F) ((limit.cone F).whisker E)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.pre_π (k : K) : limit.pre F E ≫ limit.π (E ⋙ F) k = limit.π F (E.obj k) := by
erw [IsLimit.fac]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem limit.lift_pre (c : Cone F) :
limit.lift F c ≫ limit.pre F E = limit.lift (E ⋙ F) (c.whisker E) := by ext; simp
variable {L : Type u₃} [Category.{v₃} L]
variable (D : L ⥤ K)
@[simp]
theorem limit.pre_pre [h : HasLimit (D ⋙ E ⋙ F)] : haveI : HasLimit ((D ⋙ E) ⋙ F) := h
limit.pre F E ≫ limit.pre (E ⋙ F) D = limit.pre F (D ⋙ E) := by
haveI : HasLimit ((D ⋙ E) ⋙ F) := h
ext j; erw [assoc, limit.pre_π, limit.pre_π, limit.pre_π]; rfl
variable {E F}
/-- -
If we have particular limit cones available for `E ⋙ F` and for `F`,
we obtain a formula for `limit.pre F E`.
-/
theorem limit.pre_eq (s : LimitCone (E ⋙ F)) (t : LimitCone F) :
limit.pre F E = (limit.isoLimitCone t).hom ≫ s.isLimit.lift (t.cone.whisker E) ≫
(limit.isoLimitCone s).inv := by aesop_cat
end Pre
section Post
variable {D : Type u'} [Category.{v'} D]
variable (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] (G : C ⥤ D) [HasLimit (F ⋙ G)]
/-- The canonical morphism from `G` applied to the limit of `F` to the limit of `F ⋙ G`.
-/
def limit.post : G.obj (limit F) ⟶ limit (F ⋙ G) :=
limit.lift (F ⋙ G) (G.mapCone (limit.cone F))
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.post_π (j : J) : limit.post F G ≫ limit.π (F ⋙ G) j = G.map (limit.π F j) := by
erw [IsLimit.fac]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem limit.lift_post (c : Cone F) :
G.map (limit.lift F c) ≫ limit.post F G = limit.lift (F ⋙ G) (G.mapCone c) := by
ext
rw [assoc, limit.post_π, ← G.map_comp, limit.lift_π, limit.lift_π]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem limit.post_post {E : Type u''} [Category.{v''} E] (H : D ⥤ E) [h : HasLimit ((F ⋙ G) ⋙ H)] :
-- H G (limit F) ⟶ H (limit (F ⋙ G)) ⟶ limit ((F ⋙ G) ⋙ H) equals
-- H G (limit F) ⟶ limit (F ⋙ (G ⋙ H))
haveI : HasLimit (F ⋙ G ⋙ H) := h
H.map (limit.post F G) ≫ limit.post (F ⋙ G) H = limit.post F (G ⋙ H) := by
haveI : HasLimit (F ⋙ G ⋙ H) := h
ext; erw [assoc, limit.post_π, ← H.map_comp, limit.post_π, limit.post_π]; rfl
end Post
theorem limit.pre_post {D : Type u'} [Category.{v'} D] (E : K ⥤ J) (F : J ⥤ C) (G : C ⥤ D)
[HasLimit F] [HasLimit (E ⋙ F)] [HasLimit (F ⋙ G)]
[h : HasLimit ((E ⋙ F) ⋙ G)] :-- G (limit F) ⟶ G (limit (E ⋙ F)) ⟶ limit ((E ⋙ F) ⋙ G) vs
-- G (limit F) ⟶ limit F ⋙ G ⟶ limit (E ⋙ (F ⋙ G)) or
haveI : HasLimit (E ⋙ F ⋙ G) := h
G.map (limit.pre F E) ≫ limit.post (E ⋙ F) G = limit.post F G ≫ limit.pre (F ⋙ G) E := by
haveI : HasLimit (E ⋙ F ⋙ G) := h
ext; erw [assoc, limit.post_π, ← G.map_comp, limit.pre_π, assoc, limit.pre_π, limit.post_π]
open CategoryTheory.Equivalence
instance hasLimitEquivalenceComp (e : K ≌ J) [HasLimit F] : HasLimit (e.functor ⋙ F) :=
HasLimit.mk
{ cone := Cone.whisker e.functor (limit.cone F)
isLimit := IsLimit.whiskerEquivalence (limit.isLimit F) e }
-- not entirely sure why this is needed
/-- If a `E ⋙ F` has a limit, and `E` is an equivalence, we can construct a limit of `F`.
-/
theorem hasLimitOfEquivalenceComp (e : K ≌ J) [HasLimit (e.functor ⋙ F)] : HasLimit F := by
haveI : HasLimit (e.inverse ⋙ e.functor ⋙ F) := Limits.hasLimitEquivalenceComp e.symm
apply hasLimit_of_iso (e.invFunIdAssoc F)
-- `hasLimitCompEquivalence` and `hasLimitOfCompEquivalence`
-- are proved in `CategoryTheory/Adjunction/Limits.lean`.
section LimFunctor
variable [HasLimitsOfShape J C]
section
/-- `limit F` is functorial in `F`, when `C` has all limits of shape `J`. -/
@[simps]
def lim : (J ⥤ C) ⥤ C where
obj F := limit F
map α := limMap α
map_id F := by
apply Limits.limit.hom_ext; intro j
simp
map_comp α β := by
apply Limits.limit.hom_ext; intro j
simp [assoc]
end
variable {G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ G)
theorem limMap_eq : limMap α = lim.map α := rfl
theorem limit.map_pre [HasLimitsOfShape K C] (E : K ⥤ J) :
lim.map α ≫ limit.pre G E = limit.pre F E ≫ lim.map (whiskerLeft E α) := by
ext
simp
theorem limit.map_pre' [HasLimitsOfShape K C] (F : J ⥤ C) {E₁ E₂ : K ⥤ J} (α : E₁ ⟶ E₂) :
limit.pre F E₂ = limit.pre F E₁ ≫ lim.map (whiskerRight α F) := by
ext1; simp [← category.assoc]
theorem limit.id_pre (F : J ⥤ C) : limit.pre F (𝟭 _) = lim.map (Functor.leftUnitor F).inv := by
aesop_cat
theorem limit.map_post {D : Type u'} [Category.{v'} D] [HasLimitsOfShape J D] (H : C ⥤ D) :
/- H (limit F) ⟶ H (limit G) ⟶ limit (G ⋙ H) vs
H (limit F) ⟶ limit (F ⋙ H) ⟶ limit (G ⋙ H) -/
H.map (limMap α) ≫ limit.post G H = limit.post F H ≫ limMap (whiskerRight α H) := by
ext
simp only [whiskerRight_app, limMap_π, assoc, limit.post_π_assoc, limit.post_π, ← H.map_comp]
/-- The isomorphism between
morphisms from `W` to the cone point of the limit cone for `F`
and cones over `F` with cone point `W`
is natural in `F`.
-/
def limYoneda :
lim ⋙ yoneda ⋙ (whiskeringRight _ _ _).obj uliftFunctor.{u₁} ≅ CategoryTheory.cones J C :=
NatIso.ofComponents fun F => NatIso.ofComponents fun W => limit.homIso F (unop W)
/-- The constant functor and limit functor are adjoint to each other -/
def constLimAdj : (const J : C ⥤ J ⥤ C) ⊣ lim := Adjunction.mk' {
homEquiv := fun c g ↦
{ toFun := fun f => limit.lift _ ⟨c, f⟩
invFun := fun f =>
{ app := fun _ => f ≫ limit.π _ _ }
left_inv := by aesop_cat
right_inv := by aesop_cat }
unit := { app := fun _ => limit.lift _ ⟨_, 𝟙 _⟩ }
counit := { app := fun g => { app := limit.π _ } } }
instance : IsRightAdjoint (lim : (J ⥤ C) ⥤ C) :=
⟨_, ⟨constLimAdj⟩⟩
end LimFunctor
instance limMap_mono' {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimitsOfShape J C] (α : F ⟶ G) [Mono α] : Mono (limMap α) :=
(lim : (J ⥤ C) ⥤ C).map_mono α
instance limMap_mono {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (α : F ⟶ G) [∀ j, Mono (α.app j)] :
Mono (limMap α) :=
⟨fun {Z} u v h =>
limit.hom_ext fun j => (cancel_mono (α.app j)).1 <| by simpa using h =≫ limit.π _ j⟩
section Adjunction
variable {L : (J ⥤ C) ⥤ C} (adj : Functor.const _ ⊣ L)
/- The fact that the existence of limits of shape `J` is equivalent to the existence
of a right adjoint to the constant functor `C ⥤ (J ⥤ C)` is obtained in
the file `Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.ConeCategory`: see the lemma
`hasLimitsOfShape_iff_isLeftAdjoint_const`. In the definitions below, given an
adjunction `adj : Functor.const _ ⊣ (L : (J ⥤ C) ⥤ C)`, we directly construct
a limit cone for any `F : J ⥤ C`. -/
/-- The limit cone obtained from a right adjoint of the constant functor. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def coneOfAdj (F : J ⥤ C) : Cone F where
pt := L.obj F
π := adj.counit.app F
/-- The cones defined by `coneOfAdj` are limit cones. -/
@[simps]
def isLimitConeOfAdj (F : J ⥤ C) :
IsLimit (coneOfAdj adj F) where
lift s := adj.homEquiv _ _ s.π
fac s j := by
have eq := NatTrans.congr_app (adj.counit.naturality s.π) j
have eq' := NatTrans.congr_app (adj.left_triangle_components s.pt) j
dsimp at eq eq' ⊢
rw [adj.homEquiv_unit, assoc, eq, reassoc_of% eq']
uniq s m hm := (adj.homEquiv _ _).symm.injective (by ext j; simpa using hm j)
end Adjunction
/-- We can transport limits of shape `J` along an equivalence `J ≌ J'`.
-/
theorem hasLimitsOfShape_of_equivalence {J' : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} J'] (e : J ≌ J')
[HasLimitsOfShape J C] : HasLimitsOfShape J' C := by
constructor
intro F
apply hasLimitOfEquivalenceComp e
variable (C)
/-- A category that has larger limits also has smaller limits. -/
theorem hasLimitsOfSizeOfUnivLE [UnivLE.{v₂, v₁}] [UnivLE.{u₂, u₁}]
[HasLimitsOfSize.{v₁, u₁} C] : HasLimitsOfSize.{v₂, u₂} C where
has_limits_of_shape J {_} := hasLimitsOfShape_of_equivalence
((ShrinkHoms.equivalence J).trans <| Shrink.equivalence _).symm
/-- `hasLimitsOfSizeShrink.{v u} C` tries to obtain `HasLimitsOfSize.{v u} C`
from some other `HasLimitsOfSize C`.
-/
theorem hasLimitsOfSizeShrink [HasLimitsOfSize.{max v₁ v₂, max u₁ u₂} C] :
HasLimitsOfSize.{v₁, u₁} C := hasLimitsOfSizeOfUnivLE.{max v₁ v₂, max u₁ u₂} C
instance (priority := 100) hasSmallestLimitsOfHasLimits [HasLimits C] : HasLimitsOfSize.{0, 0} C :=
hasLimitsOfSizeShrink.{0, 0} C
end Limit
section Colimit
/-- `ColimitCocone F` contains a cocone over `F` together with the information that it is a
colimit. -/
structure ColimitCocone (F : J ⥤ C) where
/-- The cocone itself -/
cocone : Cocone F
/-- The proof that it is the colimit cocone -/
isColimit : IsColimit cocone
/-- `HasColimit F` represents the mere existence of a colimit for `F`. -/
class HasColimit (F : J ⥤ C) : Prop where mk' ::
/-- There exists a colimit for `F` -/
exists_colimit : Nonempty (ColimitCocone F)
theorem HasColimit.mk {F : J ⥤ C} (d : ColimitCocone F) : HasColimit F :=
⟨Nonempty.intro d⟩
/-- Use the axiom of choice to extract explicit `ColimitCocone F` from `HasColimit F`. -/
def getColimitCocone (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F] : ColimitCocone F :=
Classical.choice <| HasColimit.exists_colimit
variable (J C)
/-- `C` has colimits of shape `J` if there exists a colimit for every functor `F : J ⥤ C`. -/
class HasColimitsOfShape : Prop where
/-- All `F : J ⥤ C` have colimits for a fixed `J` -/
has_colimit : ∀ F : J ⥤ C, HasColimit F := by infer_instance
/-- `C` has all colimits of size `v₁ u₁` (`HasColimitsOfSize.{v₁ u₁} C`)
if it has colimits of every shape `J : Type u₁` with `[Category.{v₁} J]`.
-/
@[pp_with_univ]
class HasColimitsOfSize (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] : Prop where
/-- All `F : J ⥤ C` have colimits for all small `J` -/
has_colimits_of_shape : ∀ (J : Type u₁) [Category.{v₁} J], HasColimitsOfShape J C := by
infer_instance
/-- `C` has all (small) colimits if it has colimits of every shape that is as big as its hom-sets.
-/
abbrev HasColimits (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] : Prop :=
HasColimitsOfSize.{v, v} C
theorem HasColimits.hasColimitsOfShape {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [HasColimits C] (J : Type v)
[Category.{v} J] : HasColimitsOfShape J C :=
HasColimitsOfSize.has_colimits_of_shape J
variable {J C}
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) hasColimitOfHasColimitsOfShape {J : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J]
[HasColimitsOfShape J C] (F : J ⥤ C) : HasColimit F :=
HasColimitsOfShape.has_colimit F
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) hasColimitsOfShapeOfHasColimitsOfSize {J : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J]
[HasColimitsOfSize.{v₁, u₁} C] : HasColimitsOfShape J C :=
HasColimitsOfSize.has_colimits_of_shape J
-- Interface to the `HasColimit` class.
/-- An arbitrary choice of colimit cocone of a functor. -/
def colimit.cocone (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F] : Cocone F :=
(getColimitCocone F).cocone
/-- An arbitrary choice of colimit object of a functor. -/
def colimit (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F] :=
(colimit.cocone F).pt
/-- The coprojection from a value of the functor to the colimit object. -/
def colimit.ι (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F] (j : J) : F.obj j ⟶ colimit F :=
(colimit.cocone F).ι.app j
@[reassoc]
theorem colimit.eqToHom_comp_ι (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F] {j j' : J} (hj : j = j') :
eqToHom (by subst hj; rfl) ≫ colimit.ι F j = colimit.ι F j' := by
subst hj
simp
@[simp]
theorem colimit.cocone_ι {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] (j : J) :
(colimit.cocone F).ι.app j = colimit.ι _ j :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem colimit.cocone_x {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] : (colimit.cocone F).pt = colimit F :=
rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem colimit.w (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F] {j j' : J} (f : j ⟶ j') :
F.map f ≫ colimit.ι F j' = colimit.ι F j :=
(colimit.cocone F).w f
/-- Evidence that the arbitrary choice of cocone is a colimit cocone. -/
def colimit.isColimit (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F] : IsColimit (colimit.cocone F) :=
(getColimitCocone F).isColimit
/-- The morphism from the colimit object to the cone point of any other cocone. -/
def colimit.desc (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F] (c : Cocone F) : colimit F ⟶ c.pt :=
(colimit.isColimit F).desc c
@[simp]
theorem colimit.isColimit_desc {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] (c : Cocone F) :
(colimit.isColimit F).desc c = colimit.desc F c :=
rfl
/-- We have lots of lemmas describing how to simplify `colimit.ι F j ≫ _`,
and combined with `colimit.ext` we rely on these lemmas for many calculations.
However, since `Category.assoc` is a `@[simp]` lemma, often expressions are
right associated, and it's hard to apply these lemmas about `colimit.ι`.
We thus use `reassoc` to define additional `@[simp]` lemmas, with an arbitrary extra morphism.
(see `Tactic/reassoc_axiom.lean`)
-/
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem colimit.ι_desc {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] (c : Cocone F) (j : J) :
colimit.ι F j ≫ colimit.desc F c = c.ι.app j :=
IsColimit.fac _ c j
/-- Functoriality of colimits.
Usually this morphism should be accessed through `colim.map`,
but may be needed separately when you have specified colimits for the source and target functors,
but not necessarily for all functors of shape `J`.
-/
def colimMap {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] [HasColimit G] (α : F ⟶ G) : colimit F ⟶ colimit G :=
IsColimit.map (colimit.isColimit F) _ α
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem ι_colimMap {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] [HasColimit G] (α : F ⟶ G) (j : J) :
colimit.ι F j ≫ colimMap α = α.app j ≫ colimit.ι G j :=
colimit.ι_desc _ j
/-- The cocone morphism from the arbitrary choice of colimit cocone to any cocone. -/
def colimit.coconeMorphism {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] (c : Cocone F) : colimit.cocone F ⟶ c :=
(colimit.isColimit F).descCoconeMorphism c
@[simp]
theorem colimit.coconeMorphism_hom {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] (c : Cocone F) :
(colimit.coconeMorphism c).hom = colimit.desc F c :=
rfl
theorem colimit.ι_coconeMorphism {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] (c : Cocone F) (j : J) :
colimit.ι F j ≫ (colimit.coconeMorphism c).hom = c.ι.app j := by simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem colimit.comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_hom {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] {c : Cocone F}
(hc : IsColimit c) (j : J) :
colimit.ι F j ≫ (IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit _) hc).hom = c.ι.app j :=
IsColimit.comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_hom _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem colimit.comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_inv {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] {c : Cocone F}
(hc : IsColimit c) (j : J) :
colimit.ι F j ≫ (IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso hc (colimit.isColimit _)).inv = c.ι.app j :=
IsColimit.comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_inv _ _ _
theorem colimit.existsUnique {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] (t : Cocone F) :
∃! d : colimit F ⟶ t.pt, ∀ j, colimit.ι F j ≫ d = t.ι.app j :=
(colimit.isColimit F).existsUnique _
/--
Given any other colimit cocone for `F`, the chosen `colimit F` is isomorphic to the cocone point.
-/
def colimit.isoColimitCocone {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] (t : ColimitCocone F) :
colimit F ≅ t.cocone.pt :=
IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit F) t.isColimit
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem colimit.isoColimitCocone_ι_hom {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] (t : ColimitCocone F) (j : J) :
colimit.ι F j ≫ (colimit.isoColimitCocone t).hom = t.cocone.ι.app j := by
dsimp [colimit.isoColimitCocone, IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso]
simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem colimit.isoColimitCocone_ι_inv {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] (t : ColimitCocone F) (j : J) :
t.cocone.ι.app j ≫ (colimit.isoColimitCocone t).inv = colimit.ι F j := by
dsimp [colimit.isoColimitCocone, IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso]
simp
@[ext]
theorem colimit.hom_ext {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] {X : C} {f f' : colimit F ⟶ X}
(w : ∀ j, colimit.ι F j ≫ f = colimit.ι F j ≫ f') : f = f' :=
(colimit.isColimit F).hom_ext w
@[simp]
theorem colimit.desc_cocone {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] :
colimit.desc F (colimit.cocone F) = 𝟙 (colimit F) :=
(colimit.isColimit _).desc_self
/-- The isomorphism (in `Type`) between
morphisms from the colimit object to a specified object `W`,
and cocones with cone point `W`.
-/
def colimit.homIso (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F] (W : C) :
ULift.{u₁} (colimit F ⟶ W : Type v) ≅ F.cocones.obj W :=
(colimit.isColimit F).homIso W
@[simp]
theorem colimit.homIso_hom (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F] {W : C} (f : ULift (colimit F ⟶ W)) :
(colimit.homIso F W).hom f = (colimit.cocone F).ι ≫ (const J).map f.down :=
(colimit.isColimit F).homIso_hom f
/-- The isomorphism (in `Type`) between
morphisms from the colimit object to a specified object `W`,
and an explicit componentwise description of cocones with cone point `W`.
-/
def colimit.homIso' (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F] (W : C) :
ULift.{u₁} (colimit F ⟶ W : Type v) ≅
{ p : ∀ j, F.obj j ⟶ W // ∀ {j j'} (f : j ⟶ j'), F.map f ≫ p j' = p j } :=
(colimit.isColimit F).homIso' W
theorem colimit.desc_extend (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F] (c : Cocone F) {X : C} (f : c.pt ⟶ X) :
colimit.desc F (c.extend f) = colimit.desc F c ≫ f := by ext1; rw [← Category.assoc]; simp
-- This has the isomorphism pointing in the opposite direction than in `has_limit_of_iso`.
-- This is intentional; it seems to help with elaboration.
/-- If `F` has a colimit, so does any naturally isomorphic functor.
-/
theorem hasColimit_of_iso {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] (α : G ≅ F) : HasColimit G :=
HasColimit.mk
{ cocone := (Cocones.precompose α.hom).obj (colimit.cocone F)
isColimit := (IsColimit.precomposeHomEquiv _ _).symm (colimit.isColimit F) }
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-03")] alias hasColimitOfIso := hasColimit_of_iso
theorem hasColimit_iff_of_iso {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ≅ G) : HasColimit F ↔ HasColimit G :=
⟨fun _ ↦ hasColimit_of_iso α.symm, fun _ ↦ hasColimit_of_iso α⟩
/-- If a functor `G` has the same collection of cocones as a functor `F`
which has a colimit, then `G` also has a colimit. -/
theorem HasColimit.ofCoconesIso {K : Type u₁} [Category.{v₂} K] (F : J ⥤ C) (G : K ⥤ C)
(h : F.cocones ≅ G.cocones) [HasColimit F] : HasColimit G :=
HasColimit.mk ⟨_, IsColimit.ofNatIso (IsColimit.natIso (colimit.isColimit F) ≪≫ h)⟩
/-- The colimits of `F : J ⥤ C` and `G : J ⥤ C` are isomorphic,
if the functors are naturally isomorphic.
-/
def HasColimit.isoOfNatIso {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] [HasColimit G] (w : F ≅ G) :
colimit F ≅ colimit G :=
IsColimit.coconePointsIsoOfNatIso (colimit.isColimit F) (colimit.isColimit G) w
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem HasColimit.isoOfNatIso_ι_hom {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] [HasColimit G] (w : F ≅ G)
(j : J) : colimit.ι F j ≫ (HasColimit.isoOfNatIso w).hom = w.hom.app j ≫ colimit.ι G j :=
IsColimit.comp_coconePointsIsoOfNatIso_hom _ _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem HasColimit.isoOfNatIso_ι_inv {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] [HasColimit G] (w : F ≅ G)
(j : J) : colimit.ι G j ≫ (HasColimit.isoOfNatIso w).inv = w.inv.app j ≫ colimit.ι F j :=
IsColimit.comp_coconePointsIsoOfNatIso_inv _ _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem HasColimit.isoOfNatIso_hom_desc {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] [HasColimit G] (t : Cocone G)
(w : F ≅ G) :
(HasColimit.isoOfNatIso w).hom ≫ colimit.desc G t =
colimit.desc F ((Cocones.precompose w.hom).obj _) :=
IsColimit.coconePointsIsoOfNatIso_hom_desc _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem HasColimit.isoOfNatIso_inv_desc {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] [HasColimit G] (t : Cocone F)
(w : F ≅ G) :
(HasColimit.isoOfNatIso w).inv ≫ colimit.desc F t =
colimit.desc G ((Cocones.precompose w.inv).obj _) :=
IsColimit.coconePointsIsoOfNatIso_inv_desc _ _ _
/-- The colimits of `F : J ⥤ C` and `G : K ⥤ C` are isomorphic,
if there is an equivalence `e : J ≌ K` making the triangle commute up to natural isomorphism.
-/
def HasColimit.isoOfEquivalence {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] {G : K ⥤ C} [HasColimit G] (e : J ≌ K)
(w : e.functor ⋙ G ≅ F) : colimit F ≅ colimit G :=
IsColimit.coconePointsIsoOfEquivalence (colimit.isColimit F) (colimit.isColimit G) e w
@[simp]
theorem HasColimit.isoOfEquivalence_hom_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] {G : K ⥤ C} [HasColimit G]
(e : J ≌ K) (w : e.functor ⋙ G ≅ F) (j : J) :
colimit.ι F j ≫ (HasColimit.isoOfEquivalence e w).hom =
F.map (e.unit.app j) ≫ w.inv.app _ ≫ colimit.ι G _ := by
simp [HasColimit.isoOfEquivalence, IsColimit.coconePointsIsoOfEquivalence_inv]
@[simp]
theorem HasColimit.isoOfEquivalence_inv_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] {G : K ⥤ C} [HasColimit G]
(e : J ≌ K) (w : e.functor ⋙ G ≅ F) (k : K) :
colimit.ι G k ≫ (HasColimit.isoOfEquivalence e w).inv =
G.map (e.counitInv.app k) ≫ w.hom.app (e.inverse.obj k) ≫ colimit.ι F (e.inverse.obj k) := by
simp [HasColimit.isoOfEquivalence, IsColimit.coconePointsIsoOfEquivalence_inv]
section Pre
variable (F)
variable [HasColimit F] (E : K ⥤ J) [HasColimit (E ⋙ F)]
/-- The canonical morphism from the colimit of `E ⋙ F` to the colimit of `F`.
-/
def colimit.pre : colimit (E ⋙ F) ⟶ colimit F :=
colimit.desc (E ⋙ F) ((colimit.cocone F).whisker E)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem colimit.ι_pre (k : K) : colimit.ι (E ⋙ F) k ≫ colimit.pre F E = colimit.ι F (E.obj k) := by
erw [IsColimit.fac]
rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem colimit.ι_inv_pre [IsIso (pre F E)] (k : K) :
colimit.ι F (E.obj k) ≫ inv (colimit.pre F E) = colimit.ι (E ⋙ F) k := by
simp [IsIso.comp_inv_eq]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem colimit.pre_desc (c : Cocone F) :
colimit.pre F E ≫ colimit.desc F c = colimit.desc (E ⋙ F) (c.whisker E) := by
ext; rw [← assoc, colimit.ι_pre]; simp
variable {L : Type u₃} [Category.{v₃} L]
variable (D : L ⥤ K)
@[simp]
theorem colimit.pre_pre [h : HasColimit (D ⋙ E ⋙ F)] :
haveI : HasColimit ((D ⋙ E) ⋙ F) := h
colimit.pre (E ⋙ F) D ≫ colimit.pre F E = colimit.pre F (D ⋙ E) := by
ext j
rw [← assoc, colimit.ι_pre, colimit.ι_pre]
haveI : HasColimit ((D ⋙ E) ⋙ F) := h
exact (colimit.ι_pre F (D ⋙ E) j).symm
variable {E F}
/-- -
If we have particular colimit cocones available for `E ⋙ F` and for `F`,
we obtain a formula for `colimit.pre F E`.
-/
theorem colimit.pre_eq (s : ColimitCocone (E ⋙ F)) (t : ColimitCocone F) :
colimit.pre F E =
(colimit.isoColimitCocone s).hom ≫
s.isColimit.desc (t.cocone.whisker E) ≫ (colimit.isoColimitCocone t).inv := by
aesop_cat
end Pre
section Post
variable {D : Type u'} [Category.{v'} D]
variable (F)
variable [HasColimit F] (G : C ⥤ D) [HasColimit (F ⋙ G)]
/-- The canonical morphism from `G` applied to the colimit of `F ⋙ G`
to `G` applied to the colimit of `F`.
-/
def colimit.post : colimit (F ⋙ G) ⟶ G.obj (colimit F) :=
colimit.desc (F ⋙ G) (G.mapCocone (colimit.cocone F))
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem colimit.ι_post (j : J) :
colimit.ι (F ⋙ G) j ≫ colimit.post F G = G.map (colimit.ι F j) := by
erw [IsColimit.fac]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem colimit.post_desc (c : Cocone F) :
colimit.post F G ≫ G.map (colimit.desc F c) = colimit.desc (F ⋙ G) (G.mapCocone c) := by
ext
rw [← assoc, colimit.ι_post, ← G.map_comp, colimit.ι_desc, colimit.ι_desc]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem colimit.post_post {E : Type u''} [Category.{v''} E] (H : D ⥤ E)
-- H G (colimit F) ⟶ H (colimit (F ⋙ G)) ⟶ colimit ((F ⋙ G) ⋙ H) equals
-- H G (colimit F) ⟶ colimit (F ⋙ (G ⋙ H))
[h : HasColimit ((F ⋙ G) ⋙ H)] : haveI : HasColimit (F ⋙ G ⋙ H) := h
colimit.post (F ⋙ G) H ≫ H.map (colimit.post F G) = colimit.post F (G ⋙ H) := by
ext j
rw [← assoc, colimit.ι_post, ← H.map_comp, colimit.ι_post]
haveI : HasColimit (F ⋙ G ⋙ H) := h
exact (colimit.ι_post F (G ⋙ H) j).symm
end Post
theorem colimit.pre_post {D : Type u'} [Category.{v'} D] (E : K ⥤ J) (F : J ⥤ C) (G : C ⥤ D)
[HasColimit F] [HasColimit (E ⋙ F)] [HasColimit (F ⋙ G)] [h : HasColimit ((E ⋙ F) ⋙ G)] :
-- G (colimit F) ⟶ G (colimit (E ⋙ F)) ⟶ colimit ((E ⋙ F) ⋙ G) vs
-- G (colimit F) ⟶ colimit F ⋙ G ⟶ colimit (E ⋙ (F ⋙ G)) or
haveI : HasColimit (E ⋙ F ⋙ G) := h
colimit.post (E ⋙ F) G ≫ G.map (colimit.pre F E) =
colimit.pre (F ⋙ G) E ≫ colimit.post F G := by
ext j
rw [← assoc, colimit.ι_post, ← G.map_comp, colimit.ι_pre, ← assoc]
haveI : HasColimit (E ⋙ F ⋙ G) := h
erw [colimit.ι_pre (F ⋙ G) E j, colimit.ι_post]
open CategoryTheory.Equivalence
instance hasColimit_equivalence_comp (e : K ≌ J) [HasColimit F] : HasColimit (e.functor ⋙ F) :=
HasColimit.mk
{ cocone := Cocone.whisker e.functor (colimit.cocone F)
isColimit := IsColimit.whiskerEquivalence (colimit.isColimit F) e }
/-- If a `E ⋙ F` has a colimit, and `E` is an equivalence, we can construct a colimit of `F`.
-/
theorem hasColimit_of_equivalence_comp (e : K ≌ J) [HasColimit (e.functor ⋙ F)] : HasColimit F := by
haveI : HasColimit (e.inverse ⋙ e.functor ⋙ F) := Limits.hasColimit_equivalence_comp e.symm
apply hasColimit_of_iso (e.invFunIdAssoc F).symm
section ColimFunctor
variable [HasColimitsOfShape J C]
section
/-- `colimit F` is functorial in `F`, when `C` has all colimits of shape `J`. -/
@[simps]
def colim : (J ⥤ C) ⥤ C where
obj F := colimit F
map α := colimMap α
end
variable {G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ G)
theorem colimMap_eq : colimMap α = colim.map α := rfl
@[reassoc]
theorem colimit.ι_map (j : J) : colimit.ι F j ≫ colim.map α = α.app j ≫ colimit.ι G j := by simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem colimit.map_desc (c : Cocone G) :
colimMap α ≫ colimit.desc G c = colimit.desc F ((Cocones.precompose α).obj c) := by
ext j
simp [← assoc, colimit.ι_map, assoc, colimit.ι_desc, colimit.ι_desc]
theorem colimit.pre_map [HasColimitsOfShape K C] (E : K ⥤ J) :
colimit.pre F E ≫ colim.map α = colim.map (whiskerLeft E α) ≫ colimit.pre G E := by
ext
rw [← assoc, colimit.ι_pre, colimit.ι_map, ← assoc, colimit.ι_map, assoc, colimit.ι_pre]
rfl
theorem colimit.pre_map' [HasColimitsOfShape K C] (F : J ⥤ C) {E₁ E₂ : K ⥤ J} (α : E₁ ⟶ E₂) :
colimit.pre F E₁ = colim.map (whiskerRight α F) ≫ colimit.pre F E₂ := by
ext1
simp [← assoc, assoc]
theorem colimit.pre_id (F : J ⥤ C) :
colimit.pre F (𝟭 _) = colim.map (Functor.leftUnitor F).hom := by aesop_cat
theorem colimit.map_post {D : Type u'} [Category.{v'} D] [HasColimitsOfShape J D]
(H : C ⥤ D) :/- H (colimit F) ⟶ H (colimit G) ⟶ colimit (G ⋙ H) vs
H (colimit F) ⟶ colimit (F ⋙ H) ⟶ colimit (G ⋙ H) -/
colimit.post
F H ≫
H.map (colim.map α) =
colim.map (whiskerRight α H) ≫ colimit.post G H := by
ext
rw [← assoc, colimit.ι_post, ← H.map_comp, colimit.ι_map, H.map_comp]
rw [← assoc, colimit.ι_map, assoc, colimit.ι_post]
rfl
/-- The isomorphism between
morphisms from the cone point of the colimit cocone for `F` to `W`
and cocones over `F` with cone point `W`
is natural in `F`.
-/
def colimCoyoneda : colim.op ⋙ coyoneda ⋙ (whiskeringRight _ _ _).obj uliftFunctor.{u₁}
≅ CategoryTheory.cocones J C :=
NatIso.ofComponents fun F => NatIso.ofComponents fun W => colimit.homIso (unop F) W
/-- The colimit functor and constant functor are adjoint to each other
-/
def colimConstAdj : (colim : (J ⥤ C) ⥤ C) ⊣ const J := Adjunction.mk' {
homEquiv := fun f c ↦
{ toFun := fun g =>
{ app := fun _ => colimit.ι _ _ ≫ g }
invFun := fun g => colimit.desc _ ⟨_, g⟩
left_inv := by aesop_cat
right_inv := by aesop_cat }
unit := { app := fun g => { app := colimit.ι _ } }
counit := { app := fun _ => colimit.desc _ ⟨_, 𝟙 _⟩ } }
instance : IsLeftAdjoint (colim : (J ⥤ C) ⥤ C) :=
⟨_, ⟨colimConstAdj⟩⟩
end ColimFunctor
instance colimMap_epi' {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasColimitsOfShape J C] (α : F ⟶ G) [Epi α] :
Epi (colimMap α) :=
(colim : (J ⥤ C) ⥤ C).map_epi α
instance colimMap_epi {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] [HasColimit G] (α : F ⟶ G) [∀ j, Epi (α.app j)] :
Epi (colimMap α) :=
⟨fun {Z} u v h =>
colimit.hom_ext fun j => (cancel_epi (α.app j)).1 <| by simpa using colimit.ι _ j ≫= h⟩
/-- We can transport colimits of shape `J` along an equivalence `J ≌ J'`.
-/
theorem hasColimitsOfShape_of_equivalence {J' : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} J'] (e : J ≌ J')
[HasColimitsOfShape J C] : HasColimitsOfShape J' C := by
constructor
intro F
apply hasColimit_of_equivalence_comp e
variable (C)
/-- A category that has larger colimits also has smaller colimits. -/
theorem hasColimitsOfSizeOfUnivLE [UnivLE.{v₂, v₁}] [UnivLE.{u₂, u₁}]
[HasColimitsOfSize.{v₁, u₁} C] : HasColimitsOfSize.{v₂, u₂} C where
has_colimits_of_shape J {_} := hasColimitsOfShape_of_equivalence
((ShrinkHoms.equivalence J).trans <| Shrink.equivalence _).symm
/-- `hasColimitsOfSizeShrink.{v u} C` tries to obtain `HasColimitsOfSize.{v u} C`
from some other `HasColimitsOfSize C`.
-/
theorem hasColimitsOfSizeShrink [HasColimitsOfSize.{max v₁ v₂, max u₁ u₂} C] :
HasColimitsOfSize.{v₁, u₁} C := hasColimitsOfSizeOfUnivLE.{max v₁ v₂, max u₁ u₂} C
instance (priority := 100) hasSmallestColimitsOfHasColimits [HasColimits C] :
HasColimitsOfSize.{0, 0} C :=
hasColimitsOfSizeShrink.{0, 0} C
end Colimit
section Opposite
/-- If `t : Cone F` is a limit cone, then `t.op : Cocone F.op` is a colimit cocone.
-/
def IsLimit.op {t : Cone F} (P : IsLimit t) : IsColimit t.op where
desc s := (P.lift s.unop).op
fac s j := congrArg Quiver.Hom.op (P.fac s.unop (unop j))
uniq s m w := by
dsimp
rw [← P.uniq s.unop m.unop]
· rfl
· dsimp
intro j
rw [← w]
rfl
/-- If `t : Cocone F` is a colimit cocone, then `t.op : Cone F.op` is a limit cone.
-/
def IsColimit.op {t : Cocone F} (P : IsColimit t) : IsLimit t.op where
lift s := (P.desc s.unop).op
fac s j := congrArg Quiver.Hom.op (P.fac s.unop (unop j))
uniq s m w := by
dsimp
rw [← P.uniq s.unop m.unop]
· rfl
· dsimp
intro j
rw [← w]
rfl
/-- If `t : Cone F.op` is a limit cone, then `t.unop : Cocone F` is a colimit cocone.
-/
def IsLimit.unop {t : Cone F.op} (P : IsLimit t) : IsColimit t.unop where
desc s := (P.lift s.op).unop
fac s j := congrArg Quiver.Hom.unop (P.fac s.op (.op j))
uniq s m w := by
dsimp
rw [← P.uniq s.op m.op]
· rfl
· dsimp
intro j
rw [← w]
| rfl
/-- If `t : Cocone F.op` is a colimit cocone, then `t.unop : Cone F` is a limit cone.
-/
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/HasLimits.lean | 1,143 | 1,146 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot, Yury Kudryashov, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Defs
/-!
# Intervals
In any preorder, we define intervals (which on each side can be either infinite, open or closed)
using the following naming conventions:
- `i`: infinite
- `o`: open
- `c`: closed
Each interval has the name `I` + letter for left side + letter for right side.
For instance, `Ioc a b` denotes the interval `(a, b]`.
The definitions can be found in `Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Defs`.
This file contains basic facts on inclusion of and set operations on intervals
(where the precise statements depend on the order's properties;
statements requiring `LinearOrder` are in `Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.LinearOrder`).
TODO: This is just the beginning; a lot of rules are missing
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Set
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c x : α}
instance decidableMemIoo [Decidable (a < x ∧ x < b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ioo a b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIco [Decidable (a ≤ x ∧ x < b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ico a b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIio [Decidable (x < b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Iio b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIcc [Decidable (a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Icc a b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIic [Decidable (x ≤ b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Iic b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIoc [Decidable (a < x ∧ x ≤ b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ioc a b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIci [Decidable (a ≤ x)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ici a) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIoi [Decidable (a < x)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ioi a) := by assumption
theorem left_mem_Ioo : a ∈ Ioo a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
theorem left_mem_Ico : a ∈ Ico a b ↔ a < b := by simp [le_refl]
theorem left_mem_Icc : a ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp [le_refl]
theorem left_mem_Ioc : a ∈ Ioc a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
theorem left_mem_Ici : a ∈ Ici a := by simp
theorem right_mem_Ioo : b ∈ Ioo a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
theorem right_mem_Ico : b ∈ Ico a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
theorem right_mem_Icc : b ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp [le_refl]
theorem right_mem_Ioc : b ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < b := by simp [le_refl]
theorem right_mem_Iic : a ∈ Iic a := by simp
@[simp]
theorem Ici_toDual : Ici (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Iic a :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Ici := Ici_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Iic_toDual : Iic (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ici a :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Iic := Iic_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_toDual : Ioi (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Iio a :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Ioi := Ioi_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Iio_toDual : Iio (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ioi a :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Iio := Iio_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Icc_toDual : Icc (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Icc b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Icc := Icc_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_toDual : Ioc (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ico b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Ioc := Ioc_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Ico_toDual : Ico (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ioc b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Ico := Ico_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_toDual : Ioo (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ioo b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Ioo := Ioo_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Ici_ofDual {x : αᵒᵈ} : Ici (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Iic x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Iic_ofDual {x : αᵒᵈ} : Iic (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Ici x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_ofDual {x : αᵒᵈ} : Ioi (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Iio x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Iio_ofDual {x : αᵒᵈ} : Iio (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Ioi x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Icc_ofDual {x y : αᵒᵈ} : Icc (ofDual y) (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Icc x y :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[simp]
theorem Ico_ofDual {x y : αᵒᵈ} : Ico (ofDual y) (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Ioc x y :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_ofDual {x y : αᵒᵈ} : Ioc (ofDual y) (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Ico x y :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_ofDual {x y : αᵒᵈ} : Ioo (ofDual y) (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Ioo x y :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Icc : (Icc a b).Nonempty ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx.1.trans hx.2, fun h => ⟨a, left_mem_Icc.2 h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ico : (Ico a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx.1.trans_lt hx.2, fun h => ⟨a, left_mem_Ico.2 h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioc : (Ioc a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx.1.trans_le hx.2, fun h => ⟨b, right_mem_Ioc.2 h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ici : (Ici a).Nonempty :=
⟨a, left_mem_Ici⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Iic : (Iic a).Nonempty :=
⟨a, right_mem_Iic⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioo [DenselyOrdered α] : (Ioo a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ha, hb⟩ => ha.trans hb, exists_between⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioi [NoMaxOrder α] : (Ioi a).Nonempty :=
exists_gt a
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Iio [NoMinOrder α] : (Iio a).Nonempty :=
exists_lt a
theorem nonempty_Icc_subtype (h : a ≤ b) : Nonempty (Icc a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Icc.mpr h)
theorem nonempty_Ico_subtype (h : a < b) : Nonempty (Ico a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Ico.mpr h)
theorem nonempty_Ioc_subtype (h : a < b) : Nonempty (Ioc a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Ioc.mpr h)
/-- An interval `Ici a` is nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Ici_subtype : Nonempty (Ici a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Ici
/-- An interval `Iic a` is nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Iic_subtype : Nonempty (Iic a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Iic
theorem nonempty_Ioo_subtype [DenselyOrdered α] (h : a < b) : Nonempty (Ioo a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Ioo.mpr h)
/-- In an order without maximal elements, the intervals `Ioi` are nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Ioi_subtype [NoMaxOrder α] : Nonempty (Ioi a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Ioi
/-- In an order without minimal elements, the intervals `Iio` are nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Iio_subtype [NoMinOrder α] : Nonempty (Iio a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Iio
instance [NoMinOrder α] : NoMinOrder (Iio a) :=
⟨fun a =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := exists_lt (a : α)
⟨⟨b, lt_trans hb a.2⟩, hb⟩⟩
instance [NoMinOrder α] : NoMinOrder (Iic a) :=
⟨fun a =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := exists_lt (a : α)
⟨⟨b, hb.le.trans a.2⟩, hb⟩⟩
instance [NoMaxOrder α] : NoMaxOrder (Ioi a) :=
OrderDual.noMaxOrder (α := Iio (toDual a))
instance [NoMaxOrder α] : NoMaxOrder (Ici a) :=
OrderDual.noMaxOrder (α := Iic (toDual a))
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty (h : ¬a ≤ b) : Icc a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans hb)
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ico a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans_lt hb)
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ioc a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans_le hb)
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans hb)
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_of_lt (h : b < a) : Icc a b = ∅ :=
Icc_eq_empty h.not_le
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ico a b = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioc a b = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty h.not_lt
theorem Ico_self (a : α) : Ico a a = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
theorem Ioc_self (a : α) : Ioc a a = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
theorem Ioo_self (a : α) : Ioo a a = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
@[simp]
theorem Ici_subset_Ici : Ici a ⊆ Ici b ↔ b ≤ a :=
⟨fun h => h <| left_mem_Ici, fun h _ hx => h.trans hx⟩
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Ici_subset_Ici_of_le⟩ := Ici_subset_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Ici_ssubset_Ici : Ici a ⊂ Ici b ↔ b < a where
mp h := by
obtain ⟨ab, c, cb, ac⟩ := ssubset_iff_exists.mp h
exact lt_of_le_not_le (Ici_subset_Ici.mp ab) (fun h' ↦ ac (h'.trans cb))
mpr h := (ssubset_iff_of_subset (Ici_subset_Ici.mpr h.le)).mpr
⟨b, right_mem_Iic, fun h' => h.not_le h'⟩
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Ici_ssubset_Ici_of_le⟩ := Ici_ssubset_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Iic_subset_Iic : Iic a ⊆ Iic b ↔ a ≤ b :=
@Ici_subset_Ici αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Iic_subset_Iic_of_le⟩ := Iic_subset_Iic
@[simp]
theorem Iic_ssubset_Iic : Iic a ⊂ Iic b ↔ a < b :=
@Ici_ssubset_Ici αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Iic_ssubset_Iic_of_le⟩ := Iic_ssubset_Iic
@[simp]
theorem Ici_subset_Ioi : Ici a ⊆ Ioi b ↔ b < a :=
⟨fun h => h left_mem_Ici, fun h _ hx => h.trans_le hx⟩
@[simp]
theorem Iic_subset_Iio : Iic a ⊆ Iio b ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun h => h right_mem_Iic, fun h _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt hx h⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans_lt hx₁, hx₂.trans_le h₂⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioo a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans hx₁, hx₂.trans_le h₂⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ico a₁ b :=
Ico_subset_Ico h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ :=
Ico_subset_Ico le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans hx₁, le_trans hx₂ h₂⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Icc a₂ b ⊆ Icc a₁ b :=
Icc_subset_Icc h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Icc a b₂ :=
Icc_subset_Icc le_rfl h
theorem Icc_subset_Ioo (ha : a₂ < a₁) (hb : b₁ < b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ := fun _ hx =>
⟨ha.trans_le hx.1, hx.2.trans_lt hb⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ici_self : Icc a b ⊆ Ici a := fun _ => And.left
theorem Icc_subset_Iic_self : Icc a b ⊆ Iic b := fun _ => And.right
theorem Ioc_subset_Iic_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Iic b := fun _ => And.right
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans_lt hx₁, hx₂.trans h₂⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioc a₂ b ⊆ Ioc a₁ b :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioc a b₂ :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc le_rfl h
theorem Ico_subset_Ioo_left (h₁ : a₁ < a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b := fun _ =>
And.imp_left h₁.trans_le
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ := fun _ =>
And.imp_right fun h' => h'.trans_lt h
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_right (h₁ : b₁ < b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ := fun _ =>
And.imp_right fun h₂ => h₂.trans_lt h₁
theorem Ioo_subset_Ico_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ico a b := fun _ => And.imp_left le_of_lt
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioc a b := fun _ => And.imp_right le_of_lt
theorem Ico_subset_Icc_self : Ico a b ⊆ Icc a b := fun _ => And.imp_right le_of_lt
theorem Ioc_subset_Icc_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Icc a b := fun _ => And.imp_left le_of_lt
theorem Ioo_subset_Icc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Icc a b :=
Subset.trans Ioo_subset_Ico_self Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ico_subset_Iio_self : Ico a b ⊆ Iio b := fun _ => And.right
theorem Ioo_subset_Iio_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Iio b := fun _ => And.right
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioi_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Ioi a := fun _ => And.left
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioi_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioi a := fun _ => And.left
theorem Ioi_subset_Ici_self : Ioi a ⊆ Ici a := fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx
theorem Iio_subset_Iic_self : Iio a ⊆ Iic a := fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx
theorem Ico_subset_Ici_self : Ico a b ⊆ Ici a := fun _ => And.left
theorem Ioi_ssubset_Ici_self : Ioi a ⊂ Ici a :=
⟨Ioi_subset_Ici_self, fun h => lt_irrefl a (h le_rfl)⟩
theorem Iio_ssubset_Iic_self : Iio a ⊂ Iic a :=
@Ioi_ssubset_Ici_self αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans hx, hx'.trans h'⟩⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ioo_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans_le hx, hx'.trans_lt h'⟩⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans hx, hx'.trans_lt h'⟩⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ioc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans_le hx, hx'.trans h'⟩⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Iio_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Iio b₂ ↔ b₁ < b₂ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩, fun h _ ⟨_, hx'⟩ => hx'.trans_lt h⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ioi_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioi a₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩, fun h _ ⟨hx, _⟩ => h.trans_le hx⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Iic_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Iic b₂ ↔ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩, fun h _ ⟨_, hx'⟩ => hx'.trans h⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ici_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ici a₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩, fun h _ ⟨hx, _⟩ => h.trans hx⟩
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_left (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ < a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ :=
(ssubset_iff_of_subset (Icc_subset_Icc (le_of_lt ha) hb)).mpr
⟨a₂, left_mem_Icc.mpr hI, not_and.mpr fun f _ => lt_irrefl a₂ (ha.trans_le f)⟩
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_right (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ < b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ :=
(ssubset_iff_of_subset (Icc_subset_Icc ha (le_of_lt hb))).mpr
⟨b₂, right_mem_Icc.mpr hI, fun f => lt_irrefl b₁ (hb.trans_le f.2)⟩
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(b, +∞) ⊆ (a, +∞)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in linear orders, use `Ioi_subset_Ioi_iff`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_subset_Ioi (h : a ≤ b) : Ioi b ⊆ Ioi a := fun _ hx => h.trans_lt hx
/-- If `a < b`, then `(b, +∞) ⊂ (a, +∞)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in linear orders, use `Ioi_ssubset_Ioi_iff`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_ssubset_Ioi (h : a < b) : Ioi b ⊂ Ioi a :=
(ssubset_iff_of_subset (Ioi_subset_Ioi h.le)).mpr ⟨b, h, lt_irrefl b⟩
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(b, +∞) ⊆ [a, +∞)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in dense linear orders, use `Ioi_subset_Ici_iff`. -/
theorem Ioi_subset_Ici (h : a ≤ b) : Ioi b ⊆ Ici a :=
Subset.trans (Ioi_subset_Ioi h) Ioi_subset_Ici_self
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(-∞, a) ⊆ (-∞, b)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in linear orders, use `Iio_subset_Iio_iff`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem Iio_subset_Iio (h : a ≤ b) : Iio a ⊆ Iio b := fun _ hx => lt_of_lt_of_le hx h
/-- If `a < b`, then `(-∞, a) ⊂ (-∞, b)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in linear orders, use `Iio_ssubset_Iio_iff`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem Iio_ssubset_Iio (h : a < b) : Iio a ⊂ Iio b :=
(ssubset_iff_of_subset (Iio_subset_Iio h.le)).mpr ⟨a, h, lt_irrefl a⟩
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(-∞, a) ⊆ (-∞, b]`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in dense linear orders, use `Iio_subset_Iic_iff`. -/
theorem Iio_subset_Iic (h : a ≤ b) : Iio a ⊆ Iic b :=
Subset.trans (Iio_subset_Iio h) Iio_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ici_inter_Iic : Ici a ∩ Iic b = Icc a b :=
rfl
theorem Ici_inter_Iio : Ici a ∩ Iio b = Ico a b :=
rfl
theorem Ioi_inter_Iic : Ioi a ∩ Iic b = Ioc a b :=
rfl
theorem Ioi_inter_Iio : Ioi a ∩ Iio b = Ioo a b :=
rfl
theorem Iic_inter_Ici : Iic a ∩ Ici b = Icc b a :=
inter_comm _ _
theorem Iio_inter_Ici : Iio a ∩ Ici b = Ico b a :=
inter_comm _ _
theorem Iic_inter_Ioi : Iic a ∩ Ioi b = Ioc b a :=
inter_comm _ _
theorem Iio_inter_Ioi : Iio a ∩ Ioi b = Ioo b a :=
inter_comm _ _
theorem mem_Icc_of_Ioo (h : x ∈ Ioo a b) : x ∈ Icc a b :=
Ioo_subset_Icc_self h
theorem mem_Ico_of_Ioo (h : x ∈ Ioo a b) : x ∈ Ico a b :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self h
theorem mem_Ioc_of_Ioo (h : x ∈ Ioo a b) : x ∈ Ioc a b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioc_self h
theorem mem_Icc_of_Ico (h : x ∈ Ico a b) : x ∈ Icc a b :=
Ico_subset_Icc_self h
theorem mem_Icc_of_Ioc (h : x ∈ Ioc a b) : x ∈ Icc a b :=
Ioc_subset_Icc_self h
theorem mem_Ici_of_Ioi (h : x ∈ Ioi a) : x ∈ Ici a :=
Ioi_subset_Ici_self h
theorem mem_Iic_of_Iio (h : x ∈ Iio a) : x ∈ Iic a :=
Iio_subset_Iic_self h
theorem Icc_eq_empty_iff : Icc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a ≤ b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Icc]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_iff : Ico a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Ico]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_iff : Ioc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Ioc]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_iff [DenselyOrdered α] : Ioo a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Ioo]
theorem _root_.IsTop.Iic_eq (h : IsTop a) : Iic a = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall h
theorem _root_.IsBot.Ici_eq (h : IsBot a) : Ici a = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall h
@[simp] theorem Ioi_eq_empty_iff : Ioi a = ∅ ↔ IsMax a := by
simp only [isMax_iff_forall_not_lt, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_Ioi]
@[simp] theorem Iio_eq_empty_iff : Iio a = ∅ ↔ IsMin a := Ioi_eq_empty_iff (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp] alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMax.Ioi_eq⟩ := Ioi_eq_empty_iff
@[simp] alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMin.Iio_eq⟩ := Iio_eq_empty_iff
@[simp] lemma Iio_nonempty : (Iio a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMin a := by simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
@[simp] lemma Ioi_nonempty : (Ioi a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMax a := by simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem Iic_inter_Ioc_of_le (h : a ≤ c) : Iic a ∩ Ioc b c = Ioc b a :=
ext fun _ => ⟨fun H => ⟨H.2.1, H.1⟩, fun H => ⟨H.2, H.1, H.2.trans h⟩⟩
theorem not_mem_Icc_of_lt (ha : c < a) : c ∉ Icc a b := fun h => ha.not_le h.1
theorem not_mem_Icc_of_gt (hb : b < c) : c ∉ Icc a b := fun h => hb.not_le h.2
theorem not_mem_Ico_of_lt (ha : c < a) : c ∉ Ico a b := fun h => ha.not_le h.1
theorem not_mem_Ioc_of_gt (hb : b < c) : c ∉ Ioc a b := fun h => hb.not_le h.2
theorem not_mem_Ioi_self : a ∉ Ioi a := lt_irrefl _
theorem not_mem_Iio_self : b ∉ Iio b := lt_irrefl _
theorem not_mem_Ioc_of_le (ha : c ≤ a) : c ∉ Ioc a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.1.trans_le ha
theorem not_mem_Ico_of_ge (hb : b ≤ c) : c ∉ Ico a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.2.trans_le hb
theorem not_mem_Ioo_of_le (ha : c ≤ a) : c ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.1.trans_le ha
theorem not_mem_Ioo_of_ge (hb : b ≤ c) : c ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.2.trans_le hb
section matched_intervals
@[simp] theorem Icc_eq_Ioc_same_iff : Icc a b = Ioc a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h a
mpr h := by rw [Icc_eq_empty h, Ioc_eq_empty (mt le_of_lt h)]
@[simp] theorem Icc_eq_Ico_same_iff : Icc a b = Ico a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h b
mpr h := by rw [Icc_eq_empty h, Ico_eq_empty (mt le_of_lt h)]
@[simp] theorem Icc_eq_Ioo_same_iff : Icc a b = Ioo a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h b
mpr h := by rw [Icc_eq_empty h, Ioo_eq_empty (mt le_of_lt h)]
@[simp] theorem Ioc_eq_Ico_same_iff : Ioc a b = Ico a b ↔ ¬a < b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h a
mpr h := by rw [Ioc_eq_empty h, Ico_eq_empty h]
@[simp] theorem Ioo_eq_Ioc_same_iff : Ioo a b = Ioc a b ↔ ¬a < b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h b
mpr h := by rw [Ioo_eq_empty h, Ioc_eq_empty h]
@[simp] theorem Ioo_eq_Ico_same_iff : Ioo a b = Ico a b ↔ ¬a < b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h a
mpr h := by rw [Ioo_eq_empty h, Ico_eq_empty h]
-- Mirrored versions of the above for `simp`.
@[simp] theorem Ioc_eq_Icc_same_iff : Ioc a b = Icc a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b :=
eq_comm.trans Icc_eq_Ioc_same_iff
@[simp] theorem Ico_eq_Icc_same_iff : Ico a b = Icc a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b :=
eq_comm.trans Icc_eq_Ico_same_iff
@[simp] theorem Ioo_eq_Icc_same_iff : Ioo a b = Icc a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b :=
eq_comm.trans Icc_eq_Ioo_same_iff
@[simp] theorem Ico_eq_Ioc_same_iff : Ico a b = Ioc a b ↔ ¬a < b :=
eq_comm.trans Ioc_eq_Ico_same_iff
@[simp] theorem Ioc_eq_Ioo_same_iff : Ioc a b = Ioo a b ↔ ¬a < b :=
eq_comm.trans Ioo_eq_Ioc_same_iff
@[simp] theorem Ico_eq_Ioo_same_iff : Ico a b = Ioo a b ↔ ¬a < b :=
eq_comm.trans Ioo_eq_Ico_same_iff
end matched_intervals
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem Icc_self (a : α) : Icc a a = {a} :=
Set.ext <| by simp [Icc, le_antisymm_iff, and_comm]
instance instIccUnique : Unique (Set.Icc a a) where
default := ⟨a, by simp⟩
uniq y := Subtype.ext <| by simpa using y.2
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_singleton_iff : Icc a b = {c} ↔ a = c ∧ b = c := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· have hab : a ≤ b := nonempty_Icc.1 (h.symm.subst <| singleton_nonempty c)
exact
⟨eq_of_mem_singleton <| h ▸ left_mem_Icc.2 hab,
eq_of_mem_singleton <| h ▸ right_mem_Icc.2 hab⟩
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact Icc_self _
lemma subsingleton_Icc_of_ge (hba : b ≤ a) : Set.Subsingleton (Icc a b) :=
fun _x ⟨hax, hxb⟩ _y ⟨hay, hyb⟩ ↦ le_antisymm
(le_implies_le_of_le_of_le hxb hay hba) (le_implies_le_of_le_of_le hyb hax hba)
@[simp] lemma subsingleton_Icc_iff {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} :
Set.Subsingleton (Icc a b) ↔ b ≤ a := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, subsingleton_Icc_of_ge⟩
contrapose! h
simp only [gt_iff_lt, not_subsingleton_iff]
exact ⟨a, ⟨le_refl _, h.le⟩, b, ⟨h.le, le_refl _⟩, h.ne⟩
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_left : Icc a b \ {a} = Ioc a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, eq_comm, and_right_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_right : Icc a b \ {b} = Ico a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, and_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_diff_left : Ico a b \ {a} = Ioo a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [and_right_comm, ← lt_iff_le_and_ne, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_diff_right : Ioc a b \ {b} = Ioo a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [and_assoc, ← lt_iff_le_and_ne]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_both : Icc a b \ {a, b} = Ioo a b := by
rw [insert_eq, ← diff_diff, Icc_diff_left, Ioc_diff_right]
@[simp]
theorem Ici_diff_left : Ici a \ {a} = Ioi a :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Iic_diff_right : Iic a \ {a} = Iio a :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_diff_Ioo_same (h : a < b) : Ico a b \ Ioo a b = {a} := by
rw [← Ico_diff_left, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| left_mem_Ico.2 h)]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_diff_Ioo_same (h : a < b) : Ioc a b \ Ioo a b = {b} := by
rw [← Ioc_diff_right, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| right_mem_Ioc.2 h)]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ico_same (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ico a b = {b} := by
rw [← Icc_diff_right, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| right_mem_Icc.2 h)]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ioc_same (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ioc a b = {a} := by
rw [← Icc_diff_left, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| left_mem_Icc.2 h)]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ioo_same (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ioo a b = {a, b} := by
rw [← Icc_diff_both, diff_diff_cancel_left]
simp [insert_subset_iff, h]
@[simp]
theorem Ici_diff_Ioi_same : Ici a \ Ioi a = {a} := by
rw [← Ici_diff_left, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 left_mem_Ici)]
@[simp]
theorem Iic_diff_Iio_same : Iic a \ Iio a = {a} := by
rw [← Iic_diff_right, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 right_mem_Iic)]
theorem Ioi_union_left : Ioi a ∪ {a} = Ici a :=
ext fun x => by simp [eq_comm, le_iff_eq_or_lt]
theorem Iio_union_right : Iio a ∪ {a} = Iic a :=
ext fun _ => le_iff_lt_or_eq.symm
theorem Ioo_union_left (hab : a < b) : Ioo a b ∪ {a} = Ico a b := by
rw [← Ico_diff_left, diff_union_self,
union_eq_self_of_subset_right (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| left_mem_Ico.2 hab)]
theorem Ioo_union_right (hab : a < b) : Ioo a b ∪ {b} = Ioc a b := by
simpa only [Ioo_toDual, Ico_toDual] using Ioo_union_left hab.dual
theorem Ioo_union_both (h : a ≤ b) : Ioo a b ∪ {a, b} = Icc a b := by
have : (Icc a b \ {a, b}) ∪ {a, b} = Icc a b := diff_union_of_subset fun
| x, .inl rfl => left_mem_Icc.mpr h
| x, .inr rfl => right_mem_Icc.mpr h
rw [← this, Icc_diff_both]
theorem Ioc_union_left (hab : a ≤ b) : Ioc a b ∪ {a} = Icc a b := by
rw [← Icc_diff_left, diff_union_self,
union_eq_self_of_subset_right (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| left_mem_Icc.2 hab)]
theorem Ico_union_right (hab : a ≤ b) : Ico a b ∪ {b} = Icc a b := by
simpa only [Ioc_toDual, Icc_toDual] using Ioc_union_left hab.dual
@[simp]
theorem Ico_insert_right (h : a ≤ b) : insert b (Ico a b) = Icc a b := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, Ico_union_right h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_insert_left (h : a ≤ b) : insert a (Ioc a b) = Icc a b := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, Ioc_union_left h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_insert_left (h : a < b) : insert a (Ioo a b) = Ico a b := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, Ioo_union_left h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_insert_right (h : a < b) : insert b (Ioo a b) = Ioc a b := by
rw [insert_eq, union_comm, Ioo_union_right h]
@[simp]
theorem Iio_insert : insert a (Iio a) = Iic a :=
ext fun _ => le_iff_eq_or_lt.symm
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_insert : insert a (Ioi a) = Ici a :=
ext fun _ => (or_congr_left eq_comm).trans le_iff_eq_or_lt.symm
theorem mem_Ici_Ioi_of_subset_of_subset {s : Set α} (ho : Ioi a ⊆ s) (hc : s ⊆ Ici a) :
s ∈ ({Ici a, Ioi a} : Set (Set α)) :=
by_cases
(fun h : a ∈ s =>
Or.inl <| Subset.antisymm hc <| by rw [← Ioi_union_left, union_subset_iff]; simp [*])
fun h =>
Or.inr <| Subset.antisymm (fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_ne (hc hx) fun heq => h <| heq.symm ▸ hx) ho
theorem mem_Iic_Iio_of_subset_of_subset {s : Set α} (ho : Iio a ⊆ s) (hc : s ⊆ Iic a) :
s ∈ ({Iic a, Iio a} : Set (Set α)) :=
@mem_Ici_Ioi_of_subset_of_subset αᵒᵈ _ a s ho hc
theorem mem_Icc_Ico_Ioc_Ioo_of_subset_of_subset {s : Set α} (ho : Ioo a b ⊆ s) (hc : s ⊆ Icc a b) :
s ∈ ({Icc a b, Ico a b, Ioc a b, Ioo a b} : Set (Set α)) := by
classical
by_cases ha : a ∈ s <;> by_cases hb : b ∈ s
· refine Or.inl (Subset.antisymm hc ?_)
rwa [← Ico_diff_left, diff_singleton_subset_iff, insert_eq_of_mem ha, ← Icc_diff_right,
diff_singleton_subset_iff, insert_eq_of_mem hb] at ho
· refine Or.inr <| Or.inl <| Subset.antisymm ?_ ?_
· rw [← Icc_diff_right]
exact subset_diff_singleton hc hb
· rwa [← Ico_diff_left, diff_singleton_subset_iff, insert_eq_of_mem ha] at ho
· refine Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Or.inl <| Subset.antisymm ?_ ?_
· rw [← Icc_diff_left]
exact subset_diff_singleton hc ha
· rwa [← Ioc_diff_right, diff_singleton_subset_iff, insert_eq_of_mem hb] at ho
· refine Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Subset.antisymm ?_ ho
rw [← Ico_diff_left, ← Icc_diff_right]
apply_rules [subset_diff_singleton]
theorem eq_left_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Ico {x : α} (hmem : x ∈ Ico a b) : x = a ∨ x ∈ Ioo a b :=
hmem.1.eq_or_gt.imp_right fun h => ⟨h, hmem.2⟩
theorem eq_right_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Ioc {x : α} (hmem : x ∈ Ioc a b) : x = b ∨ x ∈ Ioo a b :=
hmem.2.eq_or_lt.imp_right <| And.intro hmem.1
theorem eq_endpoints_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Icc {x : α} (hmem : x ∈ Icc a b) :
x = a ∨ x = b ∨ x ∈ Ioo a b :=
hmem.1.eq_or_gt.imp_right fun h => eq_right_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Ioc ⟨h, hmem.2⟩
theorem _root_.IsMax.Ici_eq (h : IsMax a) : Ici a = {a} :=
eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem.2 ⟨left_mem_Ici, fun _ => h.eq_of_ge⟩
theorem _root_.IsMin.Iic_eq (h : IsMin a) : Iic a = {a} :=
h.toDual.Ici_eq
theorem Ici_injective : Injective (Ici : α → Set α) := fun _ _ =>
eq_of_forall_ge_iff ∘ Set.ext_iff.1
theorem Iic_injective : Injective (Iic : α → Set α) := fun _ _ =>
eq_of_forall_le_iff ∘ Set.ext_iff.1
theorem Ici_inj : Ici a = Ici b ↔ a = b :=
Ici_injective.eq_iff
theorem Iic_inj : Iic a = Iic b ↔ a = b :=
Iic_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem Icc_inter_Icc_eq_singleton (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : Icc a b ∩ Icc b c = {b} := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iic, ← Iic_inter_Ici, inter_inter_inter_comm, Iic_inter_Ici]
simp [hab, hbc]
lemma Icc_eq_Icc_iff {d : α} (h : a ≤ b) :
Icc a b = Icc c d ↔ a = c ∧ b = d := by
refine ⟨fun heq ↦ ?_, by rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩; rfl⟩
have h' : c ≤ d := by
by_contra contra; rw [Icc_eq_empty_iff.mpr contra, Icc_eq_empty_iff] at heq; contradiction
simp only [Set.ext_iff, mem_Icc] at heq
obtain ⟨-, h₁⟩ := (heq b).mp ⟨h, le_refl _⟩
obtain ⟨h₂, -⟩ := (heq a).mp ⟨le_refl _, h⟩
obtain ⟨h₃, -⟩ := (heq c).mpr ⟨le_refl _, h'⟩
obtain ⟨-, h₄⟩ := (heq d).mpr ⟨h', le_refl _⟩
exact ⟨le_antisymm h₃ h₂, le_antisymm h₁ h₄⟩
end PartialOrder
section OrderTop
@[simp]
theorem Ici_top [PartialOrder α] [OrderTop α] : Ici (⊤ : α) = {⊤} :=
isMax_top.Ici_eq
variable [Preorder α] [OrderTop α] {a : α}
theorem Ioi_top : Ioi (⊤ : α) = ∅ :=
isMax_top.Ioi_eq
@[simp]
theorem Iic_top : Iic (⊤ : α) = univ :=
isTop_top.Iic_eq
@[simp]
theorem Icc_top : Icc a ⊤ = Ici a := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_top : Ioc a ⊤ = Ioi a := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
end OrderTop
section OrderBot
@[simp]
theorem Iic_bot [PartialOrder α] [OrderBot α] : Iic (⊥ : α) = {⊥} :=
isMin_bot.Iic_eq
variable [Preorder α] [OrderBot α] {a : α}
theorem Iio_bot : Iio (⊥ : α) = ∅ :=
isMin_bot.Iio_eq
@[simp]
theorem Ici_bot : Ici (⊥ : α) = univ :=
isBot_bot.Ici_eq
@[simp]
theorem Icc_bot : Icc ⊥ a = Iic a := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_bot : Ico ⊥ a = Iio a := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
end OrderBot
theorem Icc_bot_top [Preorder α] [BoundedOrder α] : Icc (⊥ : α) ⊤ = univ := by simp
section Lattice
section Inf
variable [SemilatticeInf α]
@[simp]
theorem Iic_inter_Iic {a b : α} : Iic a ∩ Iic b = Iic (a ⊓ b) := by
ext x
simp [Iic]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_inter_Iic (a b c : α) : Ioc a b ∩ Iic c = Ioc a (b ⊓ c) := by
rw [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ioi_inter_Iic, inter_assoc, Iic_inter_Iic]
end Inf
section Sup
variable [SemilatticeSup α]
@[simp]
theorem Ici_inter_Ici {a b : α} : Ici a ∩ Ici b = Ici (a ⊔ b) := by
ext x
simp [Ici]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_inter_Ici (a b c : α) : Ico a b ∩ Ici c = Ico (a ⊔ c) b := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iio, ← Ici_inter_Iio, ← Ici_inter_Ici, inter_right_comm]
end Sup
section Both
variable [Lattice α] {a b c a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : α}
theorem Icc_inter_Icc : Icc a₁ b₁ ∩ Icc a₂ b₂ = Icc (a₁ ⊔ a₂) (b₁ ⊓ b₂) := by
simp only [Ici_inter_Iic.symm, Ici_inter_Ici.symm, Iic_inter_Iic.symm]; ac_rfl
end Both
end Lattice
/-! ### Closed intervals in `α × β` -/
section Prod
variable {β : Type*} [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
@[simp]
theorem Iic_prod_Iic (a : α) (b : β) : Iic a ×ˢ Iic b = Iic (a, b) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Ici_prod_Ici (a : α) (b : β) : Ici a ×ˢ Ici b = Ici (a, b) :=
rfl
theorem Ici_prod_eq (a : α × β) : Ici a = Ici a.1 ×ˢ Ici a.2 :=
rfl
theorem Iic_prod_eq (a : α × β) : Iic a = Iic a.1 ×ˢ Iic a.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Icc_prod_Icc (a₁ a₂ : α) (b₁ b₂ : β) : Icc a₁ a₂ ×ˢ Icc b₁ b₂ = Icc (a₁, b₁) (a₂, b₂) := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_assoc, and_comm, and_left_comm]
theorem Icc_prod_eq (a b : α × β) : Icc a b = Icc a.1 b.1 ×ˢ Icc a.2 b.2 := by simp
end Prod
end Set
/-! ### Lemmas about intervals in dense orders -/
section Dense
variable (α) [Preorder α] [DenselyOrdered α] {x y : α}
instance : NoMinOrder (Set.Ioo x y) :=
⟨fun ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩ => by
rcases exists_between ha₁ with ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩
exact ⟨⟨b, hb₁, hb₂.trans ha₂⟩, hb₂⟩⟩
instance : NoMinOrder (Set.Ioc x y) :=
⟨fun ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩ => by
rcases exists_between ha₁ with ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩
exact ⟨⟨b, hb₁, hb₂.le.trans ha₂⟩, hb₂⟩⟩
instance : NoMinOrder (Set.Ioi x) :=
⟨fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => by
rcases exists_between ha with ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩
exact ⟨⟨b, hb₁⟩, hb₂⟩⟩
instance : NoMaxOrder (Set.Ioo x y) :=
⟨fun ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩ => by
rcases exists_between ha₂ with ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩
exact ⟨⟨b, ha₁.trans hb₁, hb₂⟩, hb₁⟩⟩
instance : NoMaxOrder (Set.Ico x y) :=
⟨fun ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩ => by
rcases exists_between ha₂ with ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩
exact ⟨⟨b, ha₁.trans hb₁.le, hb₂⟩, hb₁⟩⟩
instance : NoMaxOrder (Set.Iio x) :=
⟨fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => by
rcases exists_between ha with ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩
exact ⟨⟨b, hb₂⟩, hb₁⟩⟩
end Dense
/-! ### Intervals in `Prop` -/
namespace Set
@[simp] lemma Iic_False : Iic False = {False} := by aesop
@[simp] lemma Iic_True : Iic True = univ := by aesop
@[simp] lemma Ici_False : Ici False = univ := by aesop
@[simp] lemma Ici_True : Ici True = {True} := by aesop
lemma Iio_False : Iio False = ∅ := by aesop
@[simp] lemma Iio_True : Iio True = {False} := by aesop (add simp [Ioi, lt_iff_le_not_le])
@[simp] lemma Ioi_False : Ioi False = {True} := by aesop (add simp [Ioi, lt_iff_le_not_le])
lemma Ioi_True : Ioi True = ∅ := by aesop
end Set
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Set/Basic.lean | 1,213 | 1,216 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Neil Strickland. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Neil Strickland, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Semiconj.Defs
/-!
# Commuting pairs of elements in monoids
We define the predicate `Commute a b := a * b = b * a` and provide some operations on terms
`(h : Commute a b)`. E.g., if `a`, `b`, and c are elements of a semiring, and that
`hb : Commute a b` and `hc : Commute a c`. Then `hb.pow_left 5` proves `Commute (a ^ 5) b` and
`(hb.pow_right 2).add_right (hb.mul_right hc)` proves `Commute a (b ^ 2 + b * c)`.
Lean does not immediately recognise these terms as equations, so for rewriting we need syntax like
`rw [(hb.pow_left 5).eq]` rather than just `rw [hb.pow_left 5]`.
This file defines only a few operations (`mul_left`, `inv_right`, etc). Other operations
(`pow_right`, field inverse etc) are in the files that define corresponding notions.
## Implementation details
Most of the proofs come from the properties of `SemiconjBy`.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero DenselyOrdered
variable {G M S : Type*}
/-- Two elements commute if `a * b = b * a`. -/
@[to_additive "Two elements additively commute if `a + b = b + a`"]
def Commute [Mul S] (a b : S) : Prop :=
SemiconjBy a b b
/--
Two elements `a` and `b` commute if `a * b = b * a`.
-/
@[to_additive]
theorem commute_iff_eq [Mul S] (a b : S) : Commute a b ↔ a * b = b * a := Iff.rfl
namespace Commute
section Mul
variable [Mul S]
/-- Equality behind `Commute a b`; useful for rewriting. -/
@[to_additive "Equality behind `AddCommute a b`; useful for rewriting."]
protected theorem eq {a b : S} (h : Commute a b) : a * b = b * a :=
h
/-- Any element commutes with itself. -/
@[to_additive (attr := refl, simp) "Any element commutes with itself."]
protected theorem refl (a : S) : Commute a a :=
Eq.refl (a * a)
/-- If `a` commutes with `b`, then `b` commutes with `a`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := symm) "If `a` commutes with `b`, then `b` commutes with `a`."]
protected theorem symm {a b : S} (h : Commute a b) : Commute b a :=
Eq.symm h
@[to_additive]
protected theorem semiconjBy {a b : S} (h : Commute a b) : SemiconjBy a b b :=
h
@[to_additive]
protected theorem symm_iff {a b : S} : Commute a b ↔ Commute b a :=
⟨Commute.symm, Commute.symm⟩
@[to_additive]
instance : IsRefl S Commute :=
⟨Commute.refl⟩
-- This instance is useful for `Finset.noncommProd`
@[to_additive]
instance on_isRefl {f : G → S} : IsRefl G fun a b => Commute (f a) (f b) :=
⟨fun _ => Commute.refl _⟩
end Mul
section Semigroup
variable [Semigroup S] {a b c : S}
/-- If `a` commutes with both `b` and `c`, then it commutes with their product. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"If `a` commutes with both `b` and `c`, then it commutes with their sum."]
theorem mul_right (hab : Commute a b) (hac : Commute a c) : Commute a (b * c) :=
SemiconjBy.mul_right hab hac
-- I think `ₓ` is necessary because of the `mul` vs `HMul` distinction
/-- If both `a` and `b` commute with `c`, then their product commutes with `c`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"If both `a` and `b` commute with `c`, then their product commutes with `c`."]
theorem mul_left (hac : Commute a c) (hbc : Commute b c) : Commute (a * b) c :=
SemiconjBy.mul_left hac hbc
-- I think `ₓ` is necessary because of the `mul` vs `HMul` distinction
@[to_additive]
protected theorem right_comm (h : Commute b c) (a : S) : a * b * c = a * c * b := by
simp only [mul_assoc, h.eq]
-- I think `ₓ` is necessary because of the `mul` vs `HMul` distinction
@[to_additive]
protected theorem left_comm (h : Commute a b) (c) : a * (b * c) = b * (a * c) := by
simp only [← mul_assoc, h.eq]
-- I think `ₓ` is necessary because of the `mul` vs `HMul` distinction
@[to_additive]
protected theorem mul_mul_mul_comm (hbc : Commute b c) (a d : S) :
a * b * (c * d) = a * c * (b * d) := by simp only [hbc.left_comm, mul_assoc]
end Semigroup
@[to_additive]
protected theorem all [CommMagma S] (a b : S) : Commute a b :=
mul_comm a b
section MulOneClass
variable [MulOneClass M]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem one_right (a : M) : Commute a 1 :=
SemiconjBy.one_right a
-- I think `ₓ` is necessary because `One.toOfNat1` appears in the Lean 4 version
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem one_left (a : M) : Commute 1 a :=
SemiconjBy.one_left a
-- I think `ₓ` is necessary because `One.toOfNat1` appears in the Lean 4 version
end MulOneClass
section Monoid
variable [Monoid M] {a b : M}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem pow_right (h : Commute a b) (n : ℕ) : Commute a (b ^ n) :=
SemiconjBy.pow_right h n
-- `MulOneClass.toHasMul` vs. `MulOneClass.toMul`
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem pow_left (h : Commute a b) (n : ℕ) : Commute (a ^ n) b :=
(h.symm.pow_right n).symm
-- `MulOneClass.toHasMul` vs. `MulOneClass.toMul`
-- todo: should nat power be called `nsmul` here?
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem pow_pow (h : Commute a b) (m n : ℕ) : Commute (a ^ m) (b ^ n) :=
(h.pow_left m).pow_right n
-- `MulOneClass.toHasMul` vs. `MulOneClass.toMul`
@[to_additive]
theorem self_pow (a : M) (n : ℕ) : Commute a (a ^ n) :=
(Commute.refl a).pow_right n
-- `MulOneClass.toHasMul` vs. `MulOneClass.toMul`
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_self (a : M) (n : ℕ) : Commute (a ^ n) a :=
(Commute.refl a).pow_left n
-- `MulOneClass.toHasMul` vs. `MulOneClass.toMul`
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_pow_self (a : M) (m n : ℕ) : Commute (a ^ m) (a ^ n) :=
(Commute.refl a).pow_pow m n
-- `MulOneClass.toHasMul` vs. `MulOneClass.toMul`
@[to_additive] lemma mul_pow (h : Commute a b) : ∀ n, (a * b) ^ n = a ^ n * b ^ n
| 0 => by rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, pow_zero, one_mul]
| n + 1 => by simp only [pow_succ', h.mul_pow n, ← mul_assoc, (h.pow_left n).right_comm]
end Monoid
section DivisionMonoid
variable [DivisionMonoid G] {a b : G}
@[to_additive]
protected theorem mul_inv (hab : Commute a b) : (a * b)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ * b⁻¹ := by rw [hab.eq, mul_inv_rev]
@[to_additive]
protected theorem inv (hab : Commute a b) : (a * b)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ * b⁻¹ := by rw [hab.eq, mul_inv_rev]
@[to_additive AddCommute.zsmul_add]
protected lemma mul_zpow (h : Commute a b) : ∀ n : ℤ, (a * b) ^ n = a ^ n * b ^ n
| (n : ℕ) => by simp [zpow_natCast, h.mul_pow n]
| .negSucc n => by simp [h.mul_pow, (h.pow_pow _ _).eq, mul_inv_rev]
end DivisionMonoid
section Group
variable [Group G] {a b : G}
@[to_additive]
protected theorem mul_inv_cancel (h : Commute a b) : a * b * a⁻¹ = b := by
rw [h.eq, mul_inv_cancel_right]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inv_cancel_assoc (h : Commute a b) : a * (b * a⁻¹) = b := by
rw [← mul_assoc, h.mul_inv_cancel]
end Group
end Commute
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Commute/Defs.lean | 221 | 223 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Gabriel Ebner. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Gabriel Ebner, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov, Anatole Dedecker
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Add
/-!
# One-dimensional derivatives of sums etc
In this file we prove formulas about derivatives of `f + g`, `-f`, `f - g`, and `∑ i, f i x` for
functions from the base field to a normed space over this field.
For a more detailed overview of one-dimensional derivatives in mathlib, see the module docstring of
`Analysis/Calculus/Deriv/Basic`.
## Keywords
derivative
-/
universe u v w
open scoped Topology Filter ENNReal
open Asymptotics Set
variable {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {F : Type v} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {f g : 𝕜 → F}
variable {f' g' : F}
variable {x : 𝕜} {s : Set 𝕜} {L : Filter 𝕜}
section Add
/-! ### Derivative of the sum of two functions -/
nonrec theorem HasDerivAtFilter.add (hf : HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L)
(hg : HasDerivAtFilter g g' x L) : HasDerivAtFilter (fun y => f y + g y) (f' + g') x L := by
simpa using (hf.add hg).hasDerivAtFilter
nonrec theorem HasStrictDerivAt.add (hf : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasStrictDerivAt g g' x) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun y => f y + g y) (f' + g') x := by simpa using (hf.add hg).hasStrictDerivAt
nonrec theorem HasDerivWithinAt.add (hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hg : HasDerivWithinAt g g' s x) : HasDerivWithinAt (fun y => f y + g y) (f' + g') s x :=
hf.add hg
| nonrec theorem HasDerivAt.add (hf : HasDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasDerivAt g g' x) :
HasDerivAt (fun x => f x + g x) (f' + g') x :=
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/Deriv/Add.lean | 51 | 52 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Notation.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Defs
/-!
# Theory of filters on sets
A *filter* on a type `α` is a collection of sets of `α` which contains the whole `α`,
is upwards-closed, and is stable under intersection. They are mostly used to
abstract two related kinds of ideas:
* *limits*, including finite or infinite limits of sequences, finite or infinite limits of functions
at a point or at infinity, etc...
* *things happening eventually*, including things happening for large enough `n : ℕ`, or near enough
a point `x`, or for close enough pairs of points, or things happening almost everywhere in the
sense of measure theory. Dually, filters can also express the idea of *things happening often*:
for arbitrarily large `n`, or at a point in any neighborhood of given a point etc...
## Main definitions
In this file, we endow `Filter α` it with a complete lattice structure.
This structure is lifted from the lattice structure on `Set (Set X)` using the Galois
insertion which maps a filter to its elements in one direction, and an arbitrary set of sets to
the smallest filter containing it in the other direction.
We also prove `Filter` is a monadic functor, with a push-forward operation
`Filter.map` and a pull-back operation `Filter.comap` that form a Galois connections for the
order on filters.
The examples of filters appearing in the description of the two motivating ideas are:
* `(Filter.atTop : Filter ℕ)` : made of sets of `ℕ` containing `{n | n ≥ N}` for some `N`
* `𝓝 x` : made of neighborhoods of `x` in a topological space (defined in topology.basic)
* `𝓤 X` : made of entourages of a uniform space (those space are generalizations of metric spaces
defined in `Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean`)
* `MeasureTheory.ae` : made of sets whose complement has zero measure with respect to `μ`
(defined in `Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/AE`)
The predicate "happening eventually" is `Filter.Eventually`, and "happening often" is
`Filter.Frequently`, whose definitions are immediate after `Filter` is defined (but they come
rather late in this file in order to immediately relate them to the lattice structure).
## Notations
* `∀ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Eventually p`;
* `∃ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Frequently p`;
* `f =ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x`;
* `f ≤ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≤ g x`;
* `𝓟 s` : `Filter.Principal s`, localized in `Filter`.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
Important note: Bourbaki requires that a filter on `X` cannot contain all sets of `X`, which
we do *not* require. This gives `Filter X` better formal properties, in particular a bottom element
`⊥` for its lattice structure, at the cost of including the assumption
`[NeBot f]` in a number of lemmas and definitions.
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedSemiring Fintype
open Function Set Order
open scoped symmDiff
universe u v w x y
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
instance inhabitedMem : Inhabited { s : Set α // s ∈ f } :=
⟨⟨univ, f.univ_sets⟩⟩
theorem filter_eq_iff : f = g ↔ f.sets = g.sets :=
⟨congr_arg _, filter_eq⟩
@[simp] theorem sets_subset_sets : f.sets ⊆ g.sets ↔ g ≤ f := .rfl
@[simp] theorem sets_ssubset_sets : f.sets ⊂ g.sets ↔ g < f := .rfl
/-- An extensionality lemma that is useful for filters with good lemmas about `sᶜ ∈ f` (e.g.,
`Filter.comap`, `Filter.coprod`, `Filter.Coprod`, `Filter.cofinite`). -/
protected theorem coext (h : ∀ s, sᶜ ∈ f ↔ sᶜ ∈ g) : f = g :=
Filter.ext <| compl_surjective.forall.2 h
instance : Trans (· ⊇ ·) ((· ∈ ·) : Set α → Filter α → Prop) (· ∈ ·) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₂ h₁
instance : Trans Membership.mem (· ⊆ ·) (Membership.mem : Filter α → Set α → Prop) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₁ h₂
@[simp]
theorem inter_mem_iff {s t : Set α} : s ∩ t ∈ f ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨mem_of_superset h inter_subset_left, mem_of_superset h inter_subset_right⟩,
and_imp.2 inter_mem⟩
theorem diff_mem {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : tᶜ ∈ f) : s \ t ∈ f :=
inter_mem hs ht
theorem congr_sets (h : { x | x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t } ∈ f) : s ∈ f ↔ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun hs => mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mp), fun hs =>
mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mpr)⟩
lemma copy_eq {S} (hmem : ∀ s, s ∈ S ↔ s ∈ f) : f.copy S hmem = f := Filter.ext hmem
/-- Weaker version of `Filter.biInter_mem` that assumes `Subsingleton β` rather than `Finite β`. -/
theorem biInter_mem' {β : Type v} {s : β → Set α} {is : Set β} (hf : is.Subsingleton) :
(⋂ i ∈ is, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i ∈ is, s i ∈ f := by
apply Subsingleton.induction_on hf <;> simp
/-- Weaker version of `Filter.iInter_mem` that assumes `Subsingleton β` rather than `Finite β`. -/
theorem iInter_mem' {β : Sort v} {s : β → Set α} [Subsingleton β] :
(⋂ i, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i, s i ∈ f := by
rw [← sInter_range, sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_mem' (subsingleton_range s), forall_mem_range]
theorem exists_mem_subset_iff : (∃ t ∈ f, t ⊆ s) ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ht, ts⟩ => mem_of_superset ht ts, fun hs => ⟨s, hs, Subset.rfl⟩⟩
theorem monotone_mem {f : Filter α} : Monotone fun s => s ∈ f := fun _ _ hst h =>
mem_of_superset h hst
theorem exists_mem_and_iff {P : Set α → Prop} {Q : Set α → Prop} (hP : Antitone P)
(hQ : Antitone Q) : ((∃ u ∈ f, P u) ∧ ∃ u ∈ f, Q u) ↔ ∃ u ∈ f, P u ∧ Q u := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, v, hvf, hQv⟩
exact
⟨u ∩ v, inter_mem huf hvf, hP inter_subset_left hPu, hQ inter_subset_right hQv⟩
· rintro ⟨u, huf, hPu, hQu⟩
exact ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, u, huf, hQu⟩
theorem forall_in_swap {β : Type*} {p : Set α → β → Prop} :
(∀ a ∈ f, ∀ (b), p a b) ↔ ∀ (b), ∀ a ∈ f, p a b :=
Set.forall_in_swap
end Filter
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type*} {ι : Sort x}
theorem mem_principal_self (s : Set α) : s ∈ 𝓟 s := Subset.rfl
section Lattice
variable {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
protected theorem not_le : ¬f ≤ g ↔ ∃ s ∈ g, s ∉ f := by simp_rw [le_def, not_forall, exists_prop]
/-- `GenerateSets g s`: `s` is in the filter closure of `g`. -/
inductive GenerateSets (g : Set (Set α)) : Set α → Prop
| basic {s : Set α} : s ∈ g → GenerateSets g s
| univ : GenerateSets g univ
| superset {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → s ⊆ t → GenerateSets g t
| inter {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → GenerateSets g t → GenerateSets g (s ∩ t)
/-- `generate g` is the largest filter containing the sets `g`. -/
def generate (g : Set (Set α)) : Filter α where
sets := {s | GenerateSets g s}
univ_sets := GenerateSets.univ
sets_of_superset := GenerateSets.superset
inter_sets := GenerateSets.inter
lemma mem_generate_of_mem {s : Set <| Set α} {U : Set α} (h : U ∈ s) :
U ∈ generate s := GenerateSets.basic h
theorem le_generate_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ generate s ↔ s ⊆ f.sets :=
Iff.intro (fun h _ hu => h <| GenerateSets.basic <| hu) fun h _ hu =>
hu.recOn (fun h' => h h') univ_mem (fun _ hxy hx => mem_of_superset hx hxy) fun _ _ hx hy =>
inter_mem hx hy
@[simp] lemma generate_singleton (s : Set α) : generate {s} = 𝓟 s :=
le_antisymm (fun _t ht ↦ mem_of_superset (mem_generate_of_mem <| mem_singleton _) ht) <|
le_generate_iff.2 <| singleton_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
/-- `mkOfClosure s hs` constructs a filter on `α` whose elements set is exactly
`s : Set (Set α)`, provided one gives the assumption `hs : (generate s).sets = s`. -/
protected def mkOfClosure (s : Set (Set α)) (hs : (generate s).sets = s) : Filter α where
sets := s
univ_sets := hs ▸ univ_mem
sets_of_superset := hs ▸ mem_of_superset
inter_sets := hs ▸ inter_mem
theorem mkOfClosure_sets {s : Set (Set α)} {hs : (generate s).sets = s} :
Filter.mkOfClosure s hs = generate s :=
Filter.ext fun u =>
show u ∈ (Filter.mkOfClosure s hs).sets ↔ u ∈ (generate s).sets from hs.symm ▸ Iff.rfl
/-- Galois insertion from sets of sets into filters. -/
def giGenerate (α : Type*) :
@GaloisInsertion (Set (Set α)) (Filter α)ᵒᵈ _ _ Filter.generate Filter.sets where
gc _ _ := le_generate_iff
le_l_u _ _ h := GenerateSets.basic h
choice s hs := Filter.mkOfClosure s (le_antisymm hs <| le_generate_iff.1 <| le_rfl)
choice_eq _ _ := mkOfClosure_sets
theorem mem_inf_iff {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, s = t₁ ∩ t₂ :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_inf_of_left {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ f) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, h, univ, univ_mem, (inter_univ s).symm⟩
theorem mem_inf_of_right {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ g) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨univ, univ_mem, s, h, (univ_inter s).symm⟩
theorem inter_mem_inf {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) :
s ∩ t ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, hs, t, ht, rfl⟩
theorem mem_inf_of_inter {f g : Filter α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g)
(h : s ∩ t ⊆ u) : u ∈ f ⊓ g :=
mem_of_superset (inter_mem_inf hs ht) h
theorem mem_inf_iff_superset {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ ∩ t₂ ⊆ s :=
⟨fun ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq⟩ => ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq ▸ Subset.rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, sub⟩ =>
mem_inf_of_inter h₁ h₂ sub⟩
section CompleteLattice
/-- Complete lattice structure on `Filter α`. -/
instance instCompleteLatticeFilter : CompleteLattice (Filter α) where
inf a b := min a b
sup a b := max a b
le_sup_left _ _ _ h := h.1
le_sup_right _ _ _ h := h.2
sup_le _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _ h := ⟨h₁ h, h₂ h⟩
inf_le_left _ _ _ := mem_inf_of_left
inf_le_right _ _ _ := mem_inf_of_right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _s ⟨_a, ha, _b, hb, hs⟩ => hs.symm ▸ inter_mem (h₁ ha) (h₂ hb)
le_sSup _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := h₂ h₁
sSup_le _ _ h₁ _ h₂ _ h₃ := h₁ _ h₃ h₂
sInf_le _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := by rw [← Filter.sSup_lowerBounds]; exact fun _ h₃ ↦ h₃ h₁ h₂
le_sInf _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := by rw [← Filter.sSup_lowerBounds] at h₂; exact h₂ h₁
le_top _ _ := univ_mem'
bot_le _ _ _ := trivial
instance : Inhabited (Filter α) := ⟨⊥⟩
end CompleteLattice
theorem NeBot.ne {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) : f ≠ ⊥ := hf.ne'
@[simp] theorem not_neBot {f : Filter α} : ¬f.NeBot ↔ f = ⊥ := neBot_iff.not_left
theorem NeBot.mono {f g : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
⟨ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot hf.1 hg⟩
theorem neBot_of_le {f g : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
hf.mono hg
@[simp] theorem sup_neBot {f g : Filter α} : NeBot (f ⊔ g) ↔ NeBot f ∨ NeBot g := by
simp only [neBot_iff, not_and_or, Ne, sup_eq_bot_iff]
theorem not_disjoint_self_iff : ¬Disjoint f f ↔ f.NeBot := by rw [disjoint_self, neBot_iff]
theorem bot_sets_eq : (⊥ : Filter α).sets = univ := rfl
/-- Either `f = ⊥` or `Filter.NeBot f`. This is a version of `eq_or_ne` that uses `Filter.NeBot`
as the second alternative, to be used as an instance. -/
theorem eq_or_neBot (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ ∨ NeBot f := (eq_or_ne f ⊥).imp_right NeBot.mk
theorem sup_sets_eq {f g : Filter α} : (f ⊔ g).sets = f.sets ∩ g.sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_inf
theorem sSup_sets_eq {s : Set (Filter α)} : (sSup s).sets = ⋂ f ∈ s, (f : Filter α).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_sInf
theorem iSup_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} : (iSup f).sets = ⋂ i, (f i).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_iInf
theorem generate_empty : Filter.generate ∅ = (⊤ : Filter α) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_bot
theorem generate_univ : Filter.generate univ = (⊥ : Filter α) :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => GenerateSets.basic (mem_univ _)
theorem generate_union {s t : Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (s ∪ t) = Filter.generate s ⊓ Filter.generate t :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_sup
theorem generate_iUnion {s : ι → Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (⋃ i, s i) = ⨅ i, Filter.generate (s i) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_iSup
@[simp]
theorem mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊔ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ s ∈ g :=
Iff.rfl
theorem union_mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s ∪ t ∈ f ⊔ g :=
⟨mem_of_superset hs subset_union_left, mem_of_superset ht subset_union_right⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_iSup {x : Set α} {f : ι → Filter α} : x ∈ iSup f ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iSup_sets_eq, mem_iInter]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_neBot {f : ι → Filter α} : (⨆ i, f i).NeBot ↔ ∃ i, (f i).NeBot := by
simp [neBot_iff]
theorem iInf_eq_generate (s : ι → Filter α) : iInf s = generate (⋃ i, (s i).sets) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun _ ↦ by simp [le_generate_iff]
theorem mem_iInf_of_mem {f : ι → Filter α} (i : ι) {s} (hs : s ∈ f i) : s ∈ ⨅ i, f i :=
iInf_le f i hs
@[simp]
theorem le_principal_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ 𝓟 s ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => h Subset.rfl, fun hs _ ht => mem_of_superset hs ht⟩
theorem Iic_principal (s : Set α) : Iic (𝓟 s) = { l | s ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => le_principal_iff
theorem principal_mono {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ≤ 𝓟 t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_principal]
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.filter_principal_mono⟩ := principal_mono
@[mono]
theorem monotone_principal : Monotone (𝓟 : Set α → Filter α) := fun _ _ => principal_mono.2
@[simp] theorem principal_eq_iff_eq {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s = 𝓟 t ↔ s = t := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_principal_iff, mem_principal]; rfl
@[simp] theorem join_principal_eq_sSup {s : Set (Filter α)} : join (𝓟 s) = sSup s := rfl
@[simp] theorem principal_univ : 𝓟 (univ : Set α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_top, eq_self_iff_true]
@[simp]
theorem principal_empty : 𝓟 (∅ : Set α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => empty_subset _
theorem generate_eq_biInf (S : Set (Set α)) : generate S = ⨅ s ∈ S, 𝓟 s :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun f => by simp [le_generate_iff, le_principal_iff, subset_def]
/-! ### Lattice equations -/
theorem empty_mem_iff_bot {f : Filter α} : ∅ ∈ f ↔ f = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => bot_unique fun s _ => mem_of_superset h (empty_subset s), fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_bot⟩
theorem nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (fun h => absurd hs (h.symm ▸ mt empty_mem_iff_bot.mp hf.1)) id
theorem NeBot.nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
@Filter.nonempty_of_mem α f hf s hs
@[simp]
theorem empty_not_mem (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : ¬∅ ∈ f := fun h => (nonempty_of_mem h).ne_empty rfl
theorem nonempty_of_neBot (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : Nonempty α :=
nonempty_of_exists <| nonempty_of_mem (univ_mem : univ ∈ f)
theorem compl_not_mem {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} [NeBot f] (h : s ∈ f) : sᶜ ∉ f := fun hsc =>
(nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem h hsc)).ne_empty <| inter_compl_self s
theorem filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.mp <| univ_mem' isEmptyElim
protected lemma disjoint_iff {f g : Filter α} : Disjoint f g ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, Disjoint s t := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, ← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_iff, inf_eq_inter, bot_eq_empty,
@eq_comm _ ∅]
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (h : Disjoint s t) (hs : s ∈ f)
(ht : t ∈ g) : Disjoint f g :=
Filter.disjoint_iff.mpr ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
theorem NeBot.not_disjoint (hf : f.NeBot) (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ f) : ¬Disjoint s t := fun h =>
not_disjoint_self_iff.2 hf <| Filter.disjoint_iff.2 ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
theorem inf_eq_bot_iff {f g : Filter α} : f ⊓ g = ⊥ ↔ ∃ U ∈ f, ∃ V ∈ g, U ∩ V = ∅ := by
simp only [← disjoint_iff, Filter.disjoint_iff, Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty]
/-- There is exactly one filter on an empty type. -/
instance unique [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Filter α) where
default := ⊥
uniq := filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty
theorem NeBot.nonempty (f : Filter α) [hf : f.NeBot] : Nonempty α :=
not_isEmpty_iff.mp fun _ ↦ hf.ne (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
/-- There are only two filters on a `Subsingleton`: `⊥` and `⊤`. If the type is empty, then they are
equal. -/
theorem eq_top_of_neBot [Subsingleton α] (l : Filter α) [NeBot l] : l = ⊤ := by
refine top_unique fun s hs => ?_
obtain rfl : s = univ := Subsingleton.eq_univ_of_nonempty (nonempty_of_mem hs)
exact univ_mem
theorem forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot {f : Filter α} :
(∀ s : Set α, s ∈ f → s.Nonempty) ↔ NeBot f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun hf => not_nonempty_empty (h ∅ <| hf.symm ▸ mem_bot)⟩, @nonempty_of_mem _ _⟩
instance instNeBotTop [Nonempty α] : NeBot (⊤ : Filter α) :=
forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot.1 fun s hs => by rwa [mem_top.1 hs, ← nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty]
instance instNontrivialFilter [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Filter α) :=
⟨⟨⊤, ⊥, instNeBotTop.ne⟩⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_nonempty : Nontrivial (Filter α) ↔ Nonempty α :=
⟨fun _ =>
by_contra fun h' =>
haveI := not_nonempty_iff.1 h'
not_subsingleton (Filter α) inferInstance,
@Filter.instNontrivialFilter α⟩
theorem eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {S : Set (Filter α)} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ f ∈ S, s ∈ f) : l = sInf S :=
le_antisymm (le_sInf fun f hf _ hs => h.2 ⟨f, hf, hs⟩)
fun _ hs => let ⟨_, hf, hs⟩ := h.1 hs; (sInf_le hf) hs
theorem eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i) : l = iInf f :=
eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem <| h.trans (exists_range_iff (p := (_ ∈ ·))).symm
theorem eq_biInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {p : ι → Prop} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ s ∈ f i) : l = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), f i := by
rw [iInf_subtype']
exact eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem fun {_} => by simp only [Subtype.exists, h, exists_prop]
theorem iInf_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [ne : Nonempty ι] :
(iInf f).sets = ⋃ i, (f i).sets :=
let ⟨i⟩ := ne
let u :=
{ sets := ⋃ i, (f i).sets
univ_sets := mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, univ_mem⟩
sets_of_superset := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
exact fun i hx hxy => ⟨i, mem_of_superset hx hxy⟩
inter_sets := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
intro x y a hx b hy
rcases h a b with ⟨c, ha, hb⟩
exact ⟨c, inter_mem (ha hx) (hb hy)⟩ }
have : u = iInf f := eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem mem_iUnion
congr_arg Filter.sets this.symm
theorem mem_iInf_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [Nonempty ι] (s) :
s ∈ iInf f ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iInf_sets_eq h, mem_iUnion]
theorem mem_biInf_of_directed {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) {t : Set α} : (t ∈ ⨅ i ∈ s, f i) ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, t ∈ f i := by
haveI := ne.to_subtype
simp_rw [iInf_subtype', mem_iInf_of_directed h.directed_val, Subtype.exists, exists_prop]
theorem biInf_sets_eq {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) : (⨅ i ∈ s, f i).sets = ⋃ i ∈ s, (f i).sets :=
ext fun t => by simp [mem_biInf_of_directed h ne]
@[simp]
theorem sup_join {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} : join f₁ ⊔ join f₂ = join (f₁ ⊔ f₂) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_sup, mem_join]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_join {ι : Sort w} {f : ι → Filter (Filter α)} : ⨆ x, join (f x) = join (⨆ x, f x) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_join]
instance : DistribLattice (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.instCompleteLatticeFilter with
le_sup_inf := by
intro x y z s
simp only [and_assoc, mem_inf_iff, mem_sup, exists_prop, exists_imp, and_imp]
rintro hs t₁ ht₁ t₂ ht₂ rfl
exact
⟨t₁, x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_left, ht₁, t₂,
x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_right, ht₂, rfl⟩ }
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `ι` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed` for a version assuming `Nonempty α` instead of `Nonempty ι`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
(∀ i, NeBot (f i)) → NeBot (iInf f) :=
not_imp_not.1 <| by simpa only [not_forall, not_neBot, ← empty_mem_iff_bot,
mem_iInf_of_directed hd] using id
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `α` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed'` for a version assuming `Nonempty ι` instead of `Nonempty α`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [hn : Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f)
(hb : ∀ i, NeBot (f i)) : NeBot (iInf f) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· constructor
simp [iInf_of_empty f, top_ne_bot]
· exact iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd hb
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed' {s : Set (Filter α)} (hne : s.Nonempty) (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
@iInf_neBot_of_directed' _ _ _ hne.to_subtype hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ =>
⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed [Nonempty α] {s : Set (Filter α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
iInf_neBot_of_directed hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ => ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd⟩
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed hd⟩
/-! #### `principal` equations -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊓ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∩ t) :=
le_antisymm
(by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_inf_iff]; exact ⟨s, Subset.rfl, t, Subset.rfl, rfl⟩)
(by simp [le_inf_iff, inter_subset_left, inter_subset_right])
@[simp]
theorem sup_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊔ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∪ t) :=
Filter.ext fun u => by simp only [union_subset_iff, mem_sup, mem_principal]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_principal {ι : Sort w} {s : ι → Set α} : ⨆ x, 𝓟 (s x) = 𝓟 (⋃ i, s i) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_principal, iUnion_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem principal_eq_bot_iff {s : Set α} : 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ s = ∅ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.symm.trans <| mem_principal.trans subset_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem principal_neBot_iff {s : Set α} : NeBot (𝓟 s) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
neBot_iff.trans <| (not_congr principal_eq_bot_iff).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Nonempty.principal_neBot⟩ := principal_neBot_iff
theorem isCompl_principal (s : Set α) : IsCompl (𝓟 s) (𝓟 sᶜ) :=
IsCompl.of_eq (by rw [inf_principal, inter_compl_self, principal_empty]) <| by
rw [sup_principal, union_compl_self, principal_univ]
theorem mem_inf_principal' {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ tᶜ ∪ s ∈ f := by
simp only [← le_principal_iff, (isCompl_principal s).le_left_iff, disjoint_assoc, inf_principal,
← (isCompl_principal (t ∩ sᶜ)).le_right_iff, compl_inter, compl_compl]
lemma mem_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ { x | x ∈ t → x ∈ s } ∈ f := by
simp only [mem_inf_principal', imp_iff_not_or, setOf_or, compl_def, setOf_mem_eq]
lemma iSup_inf_principal (f : ι → Filter α) (s : Set α) : ⨆ i, f i ⊓ 𝓟 s = (⨆ i, f i) ⊓ 𝓟 s := by
ext
simp only [mem_iSup, mem_inf_principal]
theorem inf_principal_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} : f ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ sᶜ ∈ f := by
rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_principal]
simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, imp_false, compl_def]
theorem mem_of_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : f ⊓ 𝓟 sᶜ = ⊥) : s ∈ f := by
rwa [inf_principal_eq_bot, compl_compl] at h
theorem diff_mem_inf_principal_compl {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ :=
inter_mem_inf hs <| mem_principal_self tᶜ
theorem principal_le_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : 𝓟 s ≤ f ↔ ∀ V ∈ f, s ⊆ V := by
simp_rw [le_def, mem_principal]
end Lattice
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem join_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) : join f₁ ≤ join f₂ := fun _ hs => h hs
/-! ### Eventually -/
theorem eventually_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ { x | P x } ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_mem_set {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ s ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
protected theorem ext' {f₁ f₂ : Filter α}
(h : ∀ p : α → Prop, (∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : f₁ = f₂ :=
Filter.ext h
theorem Eventually.filter_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) {p : α → Prop}
(hp : ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x :=
h hp
theorem eventually_of_mem {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} {U : Set α} (hU : U ∈ f)
(h : ∀ x ∈ U, P x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x :=
mem_of_superset hU h
protected theorem Eventually.and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
f.Eventually p → f.Eventually q → ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x :=
inter_mem
@[simp] theorem eventually_true (f : Filter α) : ∀ᶠ _ in f, True := univ_mem
theorem Eventually.of_forall {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ x, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
univ_mem' hp
@[simp]
theorem eventually_false_iff_eq_bot {f : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, False) ↔ f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot
@[simp]
theorem eventually_const {f : Filter α} [t : NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases h : p <;> simp [h, t.ne]
theorem eventually_iff_exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
exists_mem_subset_iff.symm
theorem Eventually.exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem.1 hp
theorem Eventually.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mp_mem hp hq
theorem Eventually.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
hp.mp (Eventually.of_forall hq)
theorem forall_eventually_of_eventually_forall {f : Filter α} {p : α → β → Prop}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, ∀ y, p x y) : ∀ y, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x y :=
fun y => h.mono fun _ h => h y
@[simp]
theorem eventually_and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
inter_mem_iff
theorem Eventually.congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h' : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h'.mp (h.mono fun _ hx => hx.mp)
theorem eventually_congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun hp => hp.congr h, fun hq => hq.congr <| by simpa only [Iff.comm] using h⟩
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
by_cases (fun h : p => by simp [h]) fun h => by simp [h]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by
simp only [@or_comm _ q, eventually_or_distrib_left]
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∀ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_left]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_bot {p : α → Prop} : ∀ᶠ x in ⊥, p x :=
⟨⟩
@[simp]
theorem eventually_top {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∀ x, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in g, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∀ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∀ f ∈ fs, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : ι → Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∀ b, ∀ᶠ x in fs b, p x :=
mem_iSup
@[simp]
theorem eventually_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ a, p x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem Eventually.forall_mem {α : Type*} {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {P : α → Prop}
(hP : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x) (hf : 𝓟 s ≤ f) : ∀ x ∈ s, P x :=
Filter.eventually_principal.mp (hP.filter_mono hf)
theorem eventually_inf {f g : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ g, p x) ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ x ∈ s ∩ t, p x :=
mem_inf_iff_superset
theorem eventually_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x :=
mem_inf_principal
theorem eventually_iff_all_subsets {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ (s : Set α), ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x where
mp h _ := by filter_upwards [h] with _ pa _ using pa
mpr h := by filter_upwards [h univ] with _ pa using pa (by simp)
/-! ### Frequently -/
theorem Eventually.frequently {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
compl_not_mem h
theorem Frequently.of_forall {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Eventually.frequently (Eventually.of_forall h)
theorem Frequently.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mt (fun hq => hq.mp <| hpq.mono fun _ => mt) h
lemma frequently_congr {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.mp (h.mono fun _ ↦ Iff.mp), fun h' ↦ h'.mp (h.mono fun _ ↦ Iff.mpr)⟩
theorem Frequently.filter_mono {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) (hle : f ≤ g) :
∃ᶠ x in g, p x :=
mt (fun h' => h'.filter_mono hle) h
theorem Frequently.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h.mp (Eventually.of_forall hpq)
theorem Frequently.and_eventually {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
refine mt (fun h => hq.mp <| h.mono ?_) hp
exact fun x hpq hq hp => hpq ⟨hp, hq⟩
theorem Eventually.and_frequently {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
simpa only [and_comm] using hq.and_eventually hp
theorem Frequently.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) : ∃ x, p x := by
by_contra H
replace H : ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := Eventually.of_forall (not_exists.1 H)
exact hp H
theorem Eventually.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ x, p x :=
hp.frequently.exists
lemma frequently_iff_neBot {l : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in l, p x) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) := by
rw [neBot_iff, Ne, inf_principal_eq_bot]; rfl
lemma frequently_mem_iff_neBot {l : Filter α} {s : Set α} : (∃ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
frequently_iff_neBot
theorem frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ {q : α → Prop}, (∀ᶠ x in f, q x) → ∃ x, p x ∧ q x :=
⟨fun hp _ hq => (hp.and_eventually hq).exists, fun H hp => by
simpa only [and_not_self_iff, exists_false] using H hp⟩
theorem frequently_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ ∀ {U}, U ∈ f → ∃ x ∈ U, P x := by
simp only [frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and, @and_comm (P _)]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_eventually {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently]
@[simp]
theorem not_frequently {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_not]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_true_iff_neBot (f : Filter α) : (∃ᶠ _ in f, True) ↔ NeBot f := by
simp [frequently_iff_neBot]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_false (f : Filter α) : ¬∃ᶠ _ in f, False := by simp
@[simp]
theorem frequently_const {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∃ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases p <;> simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_or_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, ← not_and_or, not_or, eventually_and]
theorem frequently_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp
theorem frequently_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by simp
theorem frequently_imp_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp [imp_iff_not_or]
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp [frequently_imp_distrib]
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
simp only [frequently_imp_distrib, frequently_const]
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_right, not_frequently]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∧ q x) ↔ p ∧ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_and, eventually_imp_distrib_left, Classical.not_imp]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ q := by
simp only [@and_comm _ q, frequently_and_distrib_left]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_bot {p : α → Prop} : ¬∃ᶠ x in ⊥, p x := by simp
@[simp]
theorem frequently_top {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∃ x, p x := by simp [Filter.Frequently]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ a, p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently, not_forall]
theorem frequently_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s ∧ p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_inf_principal, not_and]
alias ⟨Frequently.of_inf_principal, Frequently.inf_principal⟩ := frequently_inf_principal
theorem frequently_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in g, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_sup, not_and_or]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∃ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∃ f ∈ fs, ∃ᶠ x in f, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_forall, eventually_sSup, exists_prop]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : β → Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∃ b, ∃ᶠ x in fs b, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_iSup, not_forall]
theorem Eventually.choice {r : α → β → Prop} {l : Filter α} [l.NeBot] (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, ∃ y, r x y) :
∃ f : α → β, ∀ᶠ x in l, r x (f x) := by
haveI : Nonempty β := let ⟨_, hx⟩ := h.exists; hx.nonempty
choose! f hf using fun x (hx : ∃ y, r x y) => hx
exact ⟨f, h.mono hf⟩
lemma skolem {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Nonempty (α i)]
{P : ∀ i : ι, α i → Prop} {F : Filter ι} :
(∀ᶠ i in F, ∃ b, P i b) ↔ ∃ b : (Π i, α i), ∀ᶠ i in F, P i (b i) := by
classical
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, fun ⟨b, hb⟩ ↦ hb.mp (.of_forall fun x a ↦ ⟨_, a⟩)⟩
refine ⟨fun i ↦ if h : ∃ b, P i b then h.choose else Nonempty.some inferInstance, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [H] with i hi
exact dif_pos hi ▸ hi.choose_spec
/-!
### Relation “eventually equal”
-/
section EventuallyEq
variable {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β}
theorem EventuallyEq.eventually (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x := h
@[simp] lemma eventuallyEq_top : f =ᶠ[⊤] g ↔ f = g := by simp [EventuallyEq, funext_iff]
theorem EventuallyEq.rw {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (p : α → β → Prop)
(hf : ∀ᶠ x in l, p x (f x)) : ∀ᶠ x in l, p x (g x) :=
hf.congr <| h.mono fun _ hx => hx ▸ Iff.rfl
theorem eventuallyEq_set {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] t ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
eventually_congr <| Eventually.of_forall fun _ ↦ eq_iff_iff
alias ⟨EventuallyEq.mem_iff, Eventually.set_eq⟩ := eventuallyEq_set
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_univ {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] univ ↔ s ∈ l := by
simp [eventuallyEq_set]
theorem EventuallyEq.exists_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
∃ s ∈ l, EqOn f g s :=
Eventually.exists_mem h
theorem eventuallyEq_of_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ l) (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[l] g :=
eventually_of_mem hs h
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_exists_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∃ s ∈ l, EqOn f g s :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem
theorem EventuallyEq.filter_mono {l l' : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (h₂ : l' ≤ l) :
f =ᶠ[l'] g :=
h₂ h₁
@[refl, simp]
theorem EventuallyEq.refl (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) : f =ᶠ[l] f :=
Eventually.of_forall fun _ => rfl
protected theorem EventuallyEq.rfl {l : Filter α} {f : α → β} : f =ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyEq.refl l f
theorem EventuallyEq.of_eq {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f = g) : f =ᶠ[l] g := h ▸ .rfl
alias _root_.Eq.eventuallyEq := EventuallyEq.of_eq
@[symm]
theorem EventuallyEq.symm {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) : g =ᶠ[l] f :=
H.mono fun _ => Eq.symm
lemma eventuallyEq_comm {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} : f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ g =ᶠ[l] f := ⟨.symm, .symm⟩
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyEq.trans {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g =ᶠ[l] h) :
f =ᶠ[l] h :=
H₂.rw (fun x y => f x = y) H₁
theorem EventuallyEq.congr_left {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
f =ᶠ[l] h ↔ g =ᶠ[l] h :=
⟨H.symm.trans, H.trans⟩
theorem EventuallyEq.congr_right {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H : g =ᶠ[l] h) :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f =ᶠ[l] h :=
⟨(·.trans H), (·.trans H.symm)⟩
instance {l : Filter α} :
Trans ((· =ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyEq.trans
theorem EventuallyEq.prodMk {l} {f f' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') {g g' : α → γ} (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
(fun x => (f x, g x)) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (f' x, g' x) :=
hf.mp <|
hg.mono <| by
intros
simp only [*]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias EventuallyEq.prod_mk := EventuallyEq.prodMk
-- See `EventuallyEq.comp_tendsto` further below for a similar statement w.r.t.
-- composition on the right.
theorem EventuallyEq.fun_comp {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) (h : β → γ) :
h ∘ f =ᶠ[l] h ∘ g :=
H.mono fun _ hx => congr_arg h hx
theorem EventuallyEq.comp₂ {δ} {f f' : α → β} {g g' : α → γ} {l} (Hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (h : β → γ → δ)
(Hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => h (f x) (g x)) =ᶠ[l] fun x => h (f' x) (g' x) :=
(Hf.prodMk Hg).fun_comp (uncurry h)
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.mul [Mul β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x * f' x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x * g' x :=
h.comp₂ (· * ·) h'
@[to_additive const_smul]
theorem EventuallyEq.pow_const {γ} [Pow β γ] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (c : γ) :
(fun x => f x ^ c) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x ^ c :=
h.fun_comp (· ^ c)
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.inv [Inv β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
(fun x => (f x)⁻¹) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (g x)⁻¹ :=
h.fun_comp Inv.inv
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.div [Div β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x / f' x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x / g' x :=
h.comp₂ (· / ·) h'
attribute [to_additive] EventuallyEq.const_smul
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.smul {𝕜} [SMul 𝕜 β] {l : Filter α} {f f' : α → 𝕜} {g g' : α → β}
(hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x • g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x • g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· • ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.sup [Max β] {l : Filter α} {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f')
(hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x ⊔ g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x ⊔ g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· ⊔ ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.inf [Min β] {l : Filter α} {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f')
(hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x ⊓ g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x ⊓ g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· ⊓ ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.preimage {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (s : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s =ᶠ[l] g ⁻¹' s :=
h.fun_comp s
theorem EventuallyEq.inter {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h.comp₂ (· ∧ ·) h'
theorem EventuallyEq.union {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h.comp₂ (· ∨ ·) h'
theorem EventuallyEq.compl {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) :
(sᶜ : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (tᶜ : Set α) :=
h.fun_comp Not
theorem EventuallyEq.diff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s \ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t \ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'.compl
protected theorem EventuallyEq.symmDiff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α}
(h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') : (s ∆ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∆ t' : Set α) :=
(h.diff h').union (h'.diff h)
theorem eventuallyEq_empty {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] (∅ : Set α) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∉ s :=
eventuallyEq_set.trans <| by simp
theorem inter_eventuallyEq_left {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
(s ∩ t : Set α) =ᶠ[l] s ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → x ∈ t := by
simp only [eventuallyEq_set, mem_inter_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
theorem inter_eventuallyEq_right {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
(s ∩ t : Set α) =ᶠ[l] t ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ t → x ∈ s := by
rw [inter_comm, inter_eventuallyEq_left]
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_principal {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} : f =ᶠ[𝓟 s] g ↔ EqOn f g s :=
Iff.rfl
theorem eventuallyEq_inf_principal_iff {F : Filter α} {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[F ⊓ 𝓟 s] g ↔ ∀ᶠ x in F, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
eventually_inf_principal
theorem EventuallyEq.sub_eq [AddGroup β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
f - g =ᶠ[l] 0 := by simpa using ((EventuallyEq.refl l f).sub h).symm
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_sub [AddGroup β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f - g =ᶠ[l] 0 :=
⟨fun h => h.sub_eq, fun h => by simpa using h.add (EventuallyEq.refl l g)⟩
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_all_subsets {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∀ s : Set α, ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
eventually_iff_all_subsets
section LE
variable [LE β] {l : Filter α}
theorem EventuallyLE.congr {f f' g g' : α → β} (H : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
f' ≤ᶠ[l] g' :=
H.mp <| hg.mp <| hf.mono fun x hf hg H => by rwa [hf, hg] at H
theorem eventuallyLE_congr {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
f ≤ᶠ[l] g ↔ f' ≤ᶠ[l] g' :=
⟨fun H => H.congr hf hg, fun H => H.congr hf.symm hg.symm⟩
theorem eventuallyLE_iff_all_subsets {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f ≤ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∀ s : Set α, ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → f x ≤ g x :=
eventually_iff_all_subsets
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
theorem EventuallyEq.le (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) : f ≤ᶠ[l] g :=
h.mono fun _ => le_of_eq
@[refl]
theorem EventuallyLE.refl (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) : f ≤ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyEq.rfl.le
theorem EventuallyLE.rfl : f ≤ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyLE.refl l f
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyLE.trans (H₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₂.mp <| H₁.mono fun _ => le_trans
instance : Trans ((· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyLE.trans
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyEq.trans_le (H₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₁.le.trans H₂
instance : Trans ((· =ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyEq.trans_le
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyLE.trans_eq (H₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g =ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₁.trans H₂.le
instance : Trans ((· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyLE.trans_eq
end Preorder
variable {l : Filter α}
theorem EventuallyLE.antisymm [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g)
(h₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] f) : f =ᶠ[l] g :=
h₂.mp <| h₁.mono fun _ => le_antisymm
theorem eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f ≤ᶠ[l] g ∧ g ≤ᶠ[l] f := by
simp only [EventuallyEq, EventuallyLE, le_antisymm_iff, eventually_and]
theorem EventuallyLE.le_iff_eq [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) :
g ≤ᶠ[l] f ↔ g =ᶠ[l] f :=
⟨fun h' => h'.antisymm h, EventuallyEq.le⟩
theorem Eventually.ne_of_lt [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x) :
∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ g x :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.ne
theorem Eventually.ne_top_of_lt [Preorder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤ :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.ne_top
theorem Eventually.lt_top_of_ne [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < ⊤ :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.lt_top
theorem Eventually.lt_top_iff_ne_top [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → β} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, f x < ⊤) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤ :=
⟨Eventually.ne_of_lt, Eventually.lt_top_of_ne⟩
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.inter {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' ≤ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h'.mp <| h.mono fun _ => And.imp
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.union {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' ≤ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h'.mp <| h.mono fun _ => Or.imp
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.compl {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) :
(tᶜ : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (sᶜ : Set α) :=
h.mono fun _ => mt
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.diff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : t' ≤ᶠ[l] s') :
(s \ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t \ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'.compl
theorem set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s ≤ᶠ[l] t ↔ t ∈ l ⊓ 𝓟 s :=
eventually_inf_principal.symm
theorem set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s ≤ᶠ[l] t ↔ l ⊓ 𝓟 s ≤ l ⊓ 𝓟 t :=
set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal.trans <| by
simp only [le_inf_iff, inf_le_left, true_and, le_principal_iff]
theorem set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s =ᶠ[l] t ↔ l ⊓ 𝓟 s = l ⊓ 𝓟 t := by
simp only [eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff, le_antisymm_iff, set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le]
theorem EventuallyLE.sup [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : α → β} (hf : f₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂)
(hg : g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] g₂) : f₁ ⊔ g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂ ⊔ g₂ := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hfx hgx using sup_le_sup hfx hgx
theorem EventuallyLE.sup_le [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (hf : f ≤ᶠ[l] h)
(hg : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ⊔ g ≤ᶠ[l] h := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hfx hgx using _root_.sup_le hfx hgx
theorem EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_left [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
(hf : h ≤ᶠ[l] f) : h ≤ᶠ[l] f ⊔ g :=
hf.mono fun _ => _root_.le_sup_of_le_left
theorem EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_right [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
(hg : h ≤ᶠ[l] g) : h ≤ᶠ[l] f ⊔ g :=
hg.mono fun _ => _root_.le_sup_of_le_right
theorem join_le {f : Filter (Filter α)} {l : Filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ m in f, m ≤ l) : join f ≤ l :=
fun _ hs => h.mono fun _ hm => hm hs
end EventuallyEq
end Filter
open Filter
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq {α β} {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} (h : EqOn f g s) : f =ᶠ[𝓟 s] g :=
h
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq_of_mem {α β} {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : EqOn f g s)
(hl : s ∈ l) : f =ᶠ[l] g :=
h.eventuallyEq.filter_mono <| Filter.le_principal_iff.2 hl
theorem HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE {α} {l : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ≤ᶠ[l] t :=
Filter.Eventually.of_forall h
variable {α β : Type*} {F : Filter α} {G : Filter β}
namespace Filter
lemma compl_mem_comk {p : Set α → Prop} {he hmono hunion s} :
sᶜ ∈ comk p he hmono hunion ↔ p s := by
simp
end Filter
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Basic.lean | 2,676 | 2,686 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.ExpDeriv
/-!
# Grönwall's inequality
The main technical result of this file is the Grönwall-like inequality
`norm_le_gronwallBound_of_norm_deriv_right_le`. It states that if `f : ℝ → E` satisfies `‖f a‖ ≤ δ`
and `∀ x ∈ [a, b), ‖f' x‖ ≤ K * ‖f x‖ + ε`, then for all `x ∈ [a, b]` we have `‖f x‖ ≤ δ * exp (K *
x) + (ε / K) * (exp (K * x) - 1)`.
Then we use this inequality to prove some estimates on the possible rate of growth of the distance
between two approximate or exact solutions of an ordinary differential equation.
The proofs are based on [Hubbard and West, *Differential Equations: A Dynamical Systems Approach*,
Sec. 4.5][HubbardWest-ode], where `norm_le_gronwallBound_of_norm_deriv_right_le` is called
“Fundamental Inequality”.
## TODO
- Once we have FTC, prove an inequality for a function satisfying `‖f' x‖ ≤ K x * ‖f x‖ + ε`,
or more generally `liminf_{y→x+0} (f y - f x)/(y - x) ≤ K x * f x + ε` with any sign
of `K x` and `f x`.
-/
open Metric Set Asymptotics Filter Real
open scoped Topology NNReal
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
/-! ### Technical lemmas about `gronwallBound` -/
/-- Upper bound used in several Grönwall-like inequalities. -/
noncomputable def gronwallBound (δ K ε x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
if K = 0 then δ + ε * x else δ * exp (K * x) + ε / K * (exp (K * x) - 1)
theorem gronwallBound_K0 (δ ε : ℝ) : gronwallBound δ 0 ε = fun x => δ + ε * x :=
funext fun _ => if_pos rfl
theorem gronwallBound_of_K_ne_0 {δ K ε : ℝ} (hK : K ≠ 0) :
gronwallBound δ K ε = fun x => δ * exp (K * x) + ε / K * (exp (K * x) - 1) :=
funext fun _ => if_neg hK
theorem hasDerivAt_gronwallBound (δ K ε x : ℝ) :
HasDerivAt (gronwallBound δ K ε) (K * gronwallBound δ K ε x + ε) x := by
by_cases hK : K = 0
· subst K
simp only [gronwallBound_K0, zero_mul, zero_add]
convert ((hasDerivAt_id x).const_mul ε).const_add δ
rw [mul_one]
· simp only [gronwallBound_of_K_ne_0 hK]
convert (((hasDerivAt_id x).const_mul K).exp.const_mul δ).add
((((hasDerivAt_id x).const_mul K).exp.sub_const 1).const_mul (ε / K)) using 1
simp only [id, mul_add, (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, mul_comm _ K, mul_div_cancel₀ _ hK]
ring
theorem hasDerivAt_gronwallBound_shift (δ K ε x a : ℝ) :
HasDerivAt (fun y => gronwallBound δ K ε (y - a)) (K * gronwallBound δ K ε (x - a) + ε) x := by
convert (hasDerivAt_gronwallBound δ K ε _).comp x ((hasDerivAt_id x).sub_const a) using 1
rw [id, mul_one]
theorem gronwallBound_x0 (δ K ε : ℝ) : gronwallBound δ K ε 0 = δ := by
by_cases hK : K = 0
· simp only [gronwallBound, if_pos hK, mul_zero, add_zero]
· simp only [gronwallBound, if_neg hK, mul_zero, exp_zero, sub_self, mul_one,
add_zero]
| theorem gronwallBound_ε0 (δ K x : ℝ) : gronwallBound δ K 0 x = δ * exp (K * x) := by
by_cases hK : K = 0
· simp only [gronwallBound_K0, hK, zero_mul, exp_zero, add_zero, mul_one]
· simp only [gronwallBound_of_K_ne_0 hK, zero_div, zero_mul, add_zero]
| Mathlib/Analysis/ODE/Gronwall.lean | 73 | 76 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Jireh Loreaux. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jireh Loreaux
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Unitization
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.Subalgebra
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Ring
/-!
# Relating unital and non-unital substructures
This file relates various algebraic structures and provides maps (generally algebra homomorphisms),
from the unitization of a non-unital subobject into the full structure. The range of this map is
the unital closure of the non-unital subobject (e.g., `Algebra.adjoin`, `Subring.closure`,
`Subsemiring.closure` or `StarAlgebra.adjoin`). When the underlying scalar ring is a field, for
this map to be injective it suffices that the range omits `1`. In this setting we provide suitable
`AlgEquiv` (or `StarAlgEquiv`) onto the range.
## Main declarations
* `NonUnitalSubalgebra.unitization s : Unitization R s →ₐ[R] A`:
where `s` is a non-unital subalgebra of a unital `R`-algebra `A`, this is the natural algebra
homomorphism sending `(r, a)` to `r • 1 + a`. The range of this map is
`Algebra.adjoin R (s : Set A)`.
* `NonUnitalSubalgebra.unitizationAlgEquiv s : Unitization R s ≃ₐ[R] Algebra.adjoin R (s : Set A)`
when `R` is a field and `1 ∉ s`. This is `NonUnitalSubalgebra.unitization` upgraded to an
`AlgEquiv` onto its range.
* `NonUnitalSubsemiring.unitization : Unitization ℕ s →ₐ[ℕ] R`: the natural `ℕ`-algebra homomorphism
from the unitization of a non-unital subsemiring `s` into the ring containing it. The range of
this map is `subalgebraOfSubsemiring (Subsemiring.closure s)`.
This is just `NonUnitalSubalgebra.unitization s` but we provide a separate declaration because
there is an instance Lean can't find on its own due to `outParam`.
* `NonUnitalSubring.unitization : Unitization ℤ s →ₐ[ℤ] R`:
the natural `ℤ`-algebra homomorphism from the unitization of a non-unital subring `s` into the
ring containing it. The range of this map is `subalgebraOfSubring (Subring.closure s)`.
This is just `NonUnitalSubalgebra.unitization s` but we provide a separate declaration because
there is an instance Lean can't find on its own due to `outParam`.
* `NonUnitalStarSubalgebra s : Unitization R s →⋆ₐ[R] A`: a version of
`NonUnitalSubalgebra.unitization` for star algebras.
* `NonUnitalStarSubalgebra.unitizationStarAlgEquiv s :`
`Unitization R s ≃⋆ₐ[R] StarAlgebra.adjoin R (s : Set A)`:
a version of `NonUnitalSubalgebra.unitizationAlgEquiv` for star algebras.
-/
/-! ## Subalgebras -/
namespace Unitization
variable {R A C : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalSemiring A]
variable [Module R A] [SMulCommClass R A A] [IsScalarTower R A A] [Semiring C] [Algebra R C]
theorem lift_range_le {f : A →ₙₐ[R] C} {S : Subalgebra R C} :
(lift f).range ≤ S ↔ NonUnitalAlgHom.range f ≤ S.toNonUnitalSubalgebra := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rintro - ⟨x, rfl⟩
exact @h (f x) ⟨x, by simp⟩
· rintro - ⟨x, rfl⟩
induction x with
| _ r a => simpa using add_mem (algebraMap_mem S r) (h ⟨a, rfl⟩)
theorem lift_range (f : A →ₙₐ[R] C) :
(lift f).range = Algebra.adjoin R (NonUnitalAlgHom.range f : Set C) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c ↦ by rw [lift_range_le, Algebra.adjoin_le_iff]; rfl
end Unitization
namespace NonUnitalSubalgebra
section Semiring
variable {R S A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [SetLike S A]
[hSA : NonUnitalSubsemiringClass S A] [hSRA : SMulMemClass S R A] (s : S)
/-- The natural `R`-algebra homomorphism from the unitization of a non-unital subalgebra into
the algebra containing it. -/
def unitization : Unitization R s →ₐ[R] A :=
Unitization.lift (NonUnitalSubalgebraClass.subtype s)
@[simp]
theorem unitization_apply (x : Unitization R s) :
unitization s x = algebraMap R A x.fst + x.snd :=
rfl
theorem unitization_range : (unitization s).range = Algebra.adjoin R (s : Set A) := by
rw [unitization, Unitization.lift_range]
simp only [NonUnitalAlgHom.coe_range, NonUnitalSubalgebraClass.coe_subtype,
Subtype.range_coe_subtype, SetLike.mem_coe]
rfl
end Semiring
/-- A sufficient condition for injectivity of `NonUnitalSubalgebra.unitization` when the scalars
are a commutative ring. When the scalars are a field, one should use the more natural
`NonUnitalStarSubalgebra.unitization_injective` whose hypothesis is easier to verify. -/
theorem _root_.AlgHomClass.unitization_injective' {F R S A : Type*} [CommRing R] [Ring A]
[Algebra R A] [SetLike S A] [hSA : NonUnitalSubringClass S A] [hSRA : SMulMemClass S R A]
(s : S) (h : ∀ r, r ≠ 0 → algebraMap R A r ∉ s)
[FunLike F (Unitization R s) A] [AlgHomClass F R (Unitization R s) A]
(f : F) (hf : ∀ x : s, f x = x) : Function.Injective f := by
refine (injective_iff_map_eq_zero f).mpr fun x hx => ?_
induction x with
| inl_add_inr r a =>
simp_rw [map_add, hf, ← Unitization.algebraMap_eq_inl, AlgHomClass.commutes] at hx
rw [add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg] at hx ⊢
by_cases hr : r = 0
· ext
· simp [hr]
· simpa [hr] using hx
· exact (h r hr <| hx ▸ (neg_mem a.property)).elim
/-- This is a generic version which allows us to prove both
`NonUnitalSubalgebra.unitization_injective` and `NonUnitalStarSubalgebra.unitization_injective`. -/
theorem _root_.AlgHomClass.unitization_injective {F R S A : Type*} [Field R] [Ring A]
[Algebra R A] [SetLike S A] [hSA : NonUnitalSubringClass S A] [hSRA : SMulMemClass S R A]
(s : S) (h1 : 1 ∉ s) [FunLike F (Unitization R s) A] [AlgHomClass F R (Unitization R s) A]
(f : F) (hf : ∀ x : s, f x = x) : Function.Injective f := by
refine AlgHomClass.unitization_injective' s (fun r hr hr' ↦ ?_) f hf
rw [Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one] at hr'
exact h1 <| inv_smul_smul₀ hr (1 : A) ▸ SMulMemClass.smul_mem r⁻¹ hr'
section Field
variable {R S A : Type*} [Field R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A]
[SetLike S A] [hSA : NonUnitalSubringClass S A] [hSRA : SMulMemClass S R A] (s : S)
theorem unitization_injective (h1 : (1 : A) ∉ s) : Function.Injective (unitization s) :=
AlgHomClass.unitization_injective s h1 (unitization s) fun _ ↦ by simp
/-- If a `NonUnitalSubalgebra` over a field does not contain `1`, then its unitization is
isomorphic to its `Algebra.adjoin`. -/
@[simps! apply_coe]
noncomputable def unitizationAlgEquiv (h1 : (1 : A) ∉ s) :
Unitization R s ≃ₐ[R] Algebra.adjoin R (s : Set A) :=
let algHom : Unitization R s →ₐ[R] Algebra.adjoin R (s : Set A) :=
((unitization s).codRestrict _
fun x ↦ (unitization_range s).le <| AlgHom.mem_range_self _ x)
AlgEquiv.ofBijective algHom <| by
refine ⟨?_, fun x ↦ ?_⟩
· have := AlgHomClass.unitization_injective s h1
((Subalgebra.val _).comp algHom) fun _ ↦ by simp [algHom]
rw [AlgHom.coe_comp] at this
exact this.of_comp
· obtain (⟨a, ha⟩ : (x : A) ∈ (unitization s).range) :=
(unitization_range s).ge x.property
exact ⟨a, Subtype.ext ha⟩
end Field
end NonUnitalSubalgebra
/-! ## Subsemirings -/
namespace NonUnitalSubsemiring
variable {R S : Type*} [Semiring R] [SetLike S R] [hSR : NonUnitalSubsemiringClass S R] (s : S)
/-- The natural `ℕ`-algebra homomorphism from the unitization of a non-unital subsemiring to
its `Subsemiring.closure`. -/
def unitization : Unitization ℕ s →ₐ[ℕ] R :=
NonUnitalSubalgebra.unitization (hSRA := AddSubmonoidClass.nsmulMemClass) s
@[simp]
theorem unitization_apply (x : Unitization ℕ s) : unitization s x = x.fst + x.snd :=
rfl
theorem unitization_range :
(unitization s).range = subalgebraOfSubsemiring (.closure s) := by
have := AddSubmonoidClass.nsmulMemClass (S := S)
rw [unitization, NonUnitalSubalgebra.unitization_range (hSRA := this), Algebra.adjoin_nat]
end NonUnitalSubsemiring
/-! ## Subrings -/
namespace NonUnitalSubring
variable {R S : Type*} [Ring R] [SetLike S R] [hSR : NonUnitalSubringClass S R] (s : S)
/-- The natural `ℤ`-algebra homomorphism from the unitization of a non-unital subring to
its `Subring.closure`. -/
def unitization : Unitization ℤ s →ₐ[ℤ] R :=
NonUnitalSubalgebra.unitization (hSRA := AddSubgroupClass.zsmulMemClass) s
@[simp]
theorem unitization_apply (x : Unitization ℤ s) : unitization s x = x.fst + x.snd :=
rfl
theorem unitization_range :
(unitization s).range = subalgebraOfSubring (.closure s) := by
have := AddSubgroupClass.zsmulMemClass (S := S)
rw [unitization, NonUnitalSubalgebra.unitization_range (hSRA := this), Algebra.adjoin_int]
end NonUnitalSubring
/-! ## Star subalgebras -/
namespace Unitization
variable {R A C : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalSemiring A] [StarRing R] [StarRing A]
variable [Module R A] [SMulCommClass R A A] [IsScalarTower R A A] [StarModule R A]
variable [Semiring C] [StarRing C] [Algebra R C] [StarModule R C]
theorem starLift_range_le
{f : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] C} {S : StarSubalgebra R C} :
(starLift f).range ≤ S ↔ NonUnitalStarAlgHom.range f ≤ S.toNonUnitalStarSubalgebra := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rintro - ⟨x, rfl⟩
exact @h (f x) ⟨x, by simp⟩
· rintro - ⟨x, rfl⟩
induction x with
| _ r a => simpa using add_mem (algebraMap_mem S r) (h ⟨a, rfl⟩)
theorem starLift_range (f : A →⋆ₙₐ[R] C) :
(starLift f).range = StarAlgebra.adjoin R (NonUnitalStarAlgHom.range f : Set C) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c ↦ by
rw [starLift_range_le, StarAlgebra.adjoin_le_iff]
rfl
end Unitization
namespace NonUnitalStarSubalgebra
section Semiring
variable {R S A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [StarRing R] [Semiring A] [StarRing A] [Algebra R A]
[StarModule R A] [SetLike S A] [hSA : NonUnitalSubsemiringClass S A] [hSRA : SMulMemClass S R A]
[StarMemClass S A] (s : S)
/-- The natural star `R`-algebra homomorphism from the unitization of a non-unital star subalgebra
to its `StarAlgebra.adjoin`. -/
def unitization : Unitization R s →⋆ₐ[R] A :=
Unitization.starLift <| NonUnitalStarSubalgebraClass.subtype s
@[simp]
theorem unitization_apply (x : Unitization R s) : unitization s x = algebraMap R A x.fst + x.snd :=
rfl
theorem unitization_range : (unitization s).range = StarAlgebra.adjoin R s := by
rw [unitization, Unitization.starLift_range]
simp only [NonUnitalStarAlgHom.coe_range, NonUnitalStarSubalgebraClass.coe_subtype,
| Subtype.range_coe_subtype]
rfl
end Semiring
| Mathlib/Algebra/Algebra/Subalgebra/Unitization.lean | 241 | 244 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomotopyCategory
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.NegOnePow
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Shift.Quotient
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Linear.LinearFunctor
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
/-!
# The shift on cochain complexes and on the homotopy category
In this file, we show that for any preadditive category `C`, the categories
`CochainComplex C ℤ` and `HomotopyCategory C (ComplexShape.up ℤ)` are
equipped with a shift by `ℤ`.
We also show that if `F : C ⥤ D` is an additive functor, then the functors
`F.mapHomologicalComplex (ComplexShape.up ℤ)` and
`F.mapHomotopyCategory (ComplexShape.up ℤ)` commute with the shift by `ℤ`.
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
universe v v' u u'
open CategoryTheory
variable (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] [Preadditive C]
{D : Type u'} [Category.{v'} D] [Preadditive D]
namespace CochainComplex
open HomologicalComplex
/-- The shift functor by `n : ℤ` on `CochainComplex C ℤ` which sends a cochain
complex `K` to the complex which is `K.X (i + n)` in degree `i`, and which
multiplies the differentials by `(-1)^n`. -/
@[simps]
def shiftFunctor (n : ℤ) : CochainComplex C ℤ ⥤ CochainComplex C ℤ where
obj K :=
{ X := fun i => K.X (i + n)
d := fun _ _ => n.negOnePow • K.d _ _
d_comp_d' := by
intros
simp only [Linear.comp_units_smul, Linear.units_smul_comp, d_comp_d, smul_zero]
shape := fun i j hij => by
rw [K.shape, smul_zero]
intro hij'
apply hij
dsimp at hij' ⊢
omega }
map φ :=
{ f := fun _ => φ.f _
comm' := by
intros
dsimp
simp only [Linear.comp_units_smul, Hom.comm, Linear.units_smul_comp] }
map_id := by intros; rfl
map_comp := by intros; rfl
instance (n : ℤ) : (shiftFunctor C n).Additive where
variable {C}
/-- The canonical isomorphism `((shiftFunctor C n).obj K).X i ≅ K.X m` when `m = i + n`. -/
@[simp]
def shiftFunctorObjXIso (K : CochainComplex C ℤ) (n i m : ℤ) (hm : m = i + n) :
((shiftFunctor C n).obj K).X i ≅ K.X m := K.XIsoOfEq hm.symm
section
variable (C)
attribute [local simp] XIsoOfEq_hom_naturality
/-- The shift functor by `n` on `CochainComplex C ℤ` identifies to the identity
functor when `n = 0`. -/
@[simps!]
def shiftFunctorZero' (n : ℤ) (h : n = 0) :
shiftFunctor C n ≅ 𝟭 _ :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun K => Hom.isoOfComponents
(fun i => K.shiftFunctorObjXIso _ _ _ (by omega))
(fun _ _ _ => by dsimp; simp [h])) (fun _ ↦ by ext; dsimp; simp)
/-- The compatibility of the shift functors on `CochainComplex C ℤ` with respect
to the addition of integers. -/
@[simps!]
def shiftFunctorAdd' (n₁ n₂ n₁₂ : ℤ) (h : n₁ + n₂ = n₁₂) :
shiftFunctor C n₁₂ ≅ shiftFunctor C n₁ ⋙ shiftFunctor C n₂ :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun K => Hom.isoOfComponents
(fun i => K.shiftFunctorObjXIso _ _ _ (by omega))
(fun _ _ _ => by
subst h
dsimp
simp only [add_comm n₁ n₂, Int.negOnePow_add, Linear.units_smul_comp,
Linear.comp_units_smul, d_comp_XIsoOfEq_hom, smul_smul, XIsoOfEq_hom_comp_d]))
(by intros; ext; dsimp; simp)
attribute [local simp] XIsoOfEq
instance : HasShift (CochainComplex C ℤ) ℤ := hasShiftMk _ _
{ F := shiftFunctor C
zero := shiftFunctorZero' C _ rfl
add := fun n₁ n₂ => shiftFunctorAdd' C n₁ n₂ _ rfl }
instance (n : ℤ) :
(CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor (HomologicalComplex C (ComplexShape.up ℤ)) n).Additive :=
(inferInstance : (CochainComplex.shiftFunctor C n).Additive)
end
@[simp]
lemma shiftFunctor_obj_X' (K : CochainComplex C ℤ) (n p : ℤ) :
((CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor (CochainComplex C ℤ) n).obj K).X p = K.X (p + n) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma shiftFunctor_map_f' {K L : CochainComplex C ℤ} (φ : K ⟶ L) (n p : ℤ) :
((CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor (CochainComplex C ℤ) n).map φ).f p = φ.f (p + n) := rfl
@[simp]
lemma shiftFunctor_obj_d' (K : CochainComplex C ℤ) (n i j : ℤ) :
((CategoryTheory.shiftFunctor (CochainComplex C ℤ) n).obj K).d i j =
n.negOnePow • K.d _ _ := rfl
lemma shiftFunctorAdd_inv_app_f (K : CochainComplex C ℤ) (a b n : ℤ) :
((shiftFunctorAdd (CochainComplex C ℤ) a b).inv.app K).f n =
(K.XIsoOfEq (by dsimp; rw [add_comm a, add_assoc])).hom := rfl
lemma shiftFunctorAdd_hom_app_f (K : CochainComplex C ℤ) (a b n : ℤ) :
((shiftFunctorAdd (CochainComplex C ℤ) a b).hom.app K).f n =
(K.XIsoOfEq (by dsimp; rw [add_comm a, add_assoc])).hom := by
have : IsIso (((shiftFunctorAdd (CochainComplex C ℤ) a b).inv.app K).f n) := by
rw [shiftFunctorAdd_inv_app_f]
infer_instance
rw [← cancel_mono (((shiftFunctorAdd (CochainComplex C ℤ) a b).inv.app K).f n),
← comp_f, Iso.hom_inv_id_app, id_f, shiftFunctorAdd_inv_app_f]
simp only [XIsoOfEq, eqToIso.hom, eqToHom_trans, eqToHom_refl]
lemma shiftFunctorAdd'_inv_app_f' (K : CochainComplex C ℤ) (a b ab : ℤ) (h : a + b = ab) (n : ℤ) :
((CategoryTheory.shiftFunctorAdd' (CochainComplex C ℤ) a b ab h).inv.app K).f n =
(K.XIsoOfEq (by dsimp; rw [← h, add_assoc, add_comm a])).hom := by
subst h
rw [shiftFunctorAdd'_eq_shiftFunctorAdd, shiftFunctorAdd_inv_app_f]
lemma shiftFunctorAdd'_hom_app_f' (K : CochainComplex C ℤ) (a b ab : ℤ) (h : a + b = ab) (n : ℤ) :
((CategoryTheory.shiftFunctorAdd' (CochainComplex C ℤ) a b ab h).hom.app K).f n =
(K.XIsoOfEq (by dsimp; rw [← h, add_assoc, add_comm a])).hom := by
subst h
rw [shiftFunctorAdd'_eq_shiftFunctorAdd, shiftFunctorAdd_hom_app_f]
lemma shiftFunctorZero_inv_app_f (K : CochainComplex C ℤ) (n : ℤ) :
((CategoryTheory.shiftFunctorZero (CochainComplex C ℤ) ℤ).inv.app K).f n =
(K.XIsoOfEq (by dsimp; rw [add_zero])).hom := rfl
lemma shiftFunctorZero_hom_app_f (K : CochainComplex C ℤ) (n : ℤ) :
((CategoryTheory.shiftFunctorZero (CochainComplex C ℤ) ℤ).hom.app K).f n =
(K.XIsoOfEq (by dsimp; rw [add_zero])).hom := by
have : IsIso (((shiftFunctorZero (CochainComplex C ℤ) ℤ).inv.app K).f n) := by
rw [shiftFunctorZero_inv_app_f]
infer_instance
rw [← cancel_mono (((shiftFunctorZero (CochainComplex C ℤ) ℤ).inv.app K).f n), ← comp_f,
Iso.hom_inv_id_app, id_f, shiftFunctorZero_inv_app_f]
simp only [XIsoOfEq, eqToIso.hom, eqToHom_trans, eqToHom_refl]
lemma XIsoOfEq_shift (K : CochainComplex C ℤ) (n : ℤ) {p q : ℤ} (hpq : p = q) :
(K⟦n⟧).XIsoOfEq hpq = K.XIsoOfEq (show p + n = q + n by rw [hpq]) := rfl
variable (C)
lemma shiftFunctorAdd'_eq (a b c : ℤ) (h : a + b = c) :
| CategoryTheory.shiftFunctorAdd' (CochainComplex C ℤ) a b c h =
shiftFunctorAdd' C a b c h := by
ext
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/HomotopyCategory/Shift.lean | 174 | 176 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Map
/-!
# Kernel of a filter
In this file we define the *kernel* `Filter.ker f` of a filter `f`
to be the intersection of all its sets.
We also prove that `Filter.principal` and `Filter.ker` form a Galois coinsertion
and prove other basic theorems about `Filter.ker`.
-/
open Function Set
namespace Filter
variable {ι : Sort*} {α β : Type*} {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} {a : α}
lemma ker_def (f : Filter α) : f.ker = ⋂ s ∈ f, s := sInter_eq_biInter
@[simp] lemma mem_ker : a ∈ f.ker ↔ ∀ s ∈ f, a ∈ s := mem_sInter
@[simp] lemma subset_ker : s ⊆ f.ker ↔ ∀ t ∈ f, s ⊆ t := subset_sInter_iff
/-- `Filter.principal` forms a Galois coinsertion with `Filter.ker`. -/
def gi_principal_ker : GaloisCoinsertion (𝓟 : Set α → Filter α) ker :=
GaloisConnection.toGaloisCoinsertion (fun s f ↦ by simp [principal_le_iff]) <| by
simp only [le_iff_subset, subset_def, mem_ker, mem_principal]; aesop
lemma ker_mono : Monotone (ker : Filter α → Set α) := gi_principal_ker.gc.monotone_u
lemma ker_surjective : Surjective (ker : Filter α → Set α) := gi_principal_ker.u_surjective
@[simp] lemma ker_bot : ker (⊥ : Filter α) = ∅ := sInter_eq_empty_iff.2 fun _ ↦ ⟨∅, trivial, id⟩
@[simp] lemma ker_top : ker (⊤ : Filter α) = univ := gi_principal_ker.gc.u_top
@[simp] lemma ker_eq_univ : ker f = univ ↔ f = ⊤ := gi_principal_ker.gc.u_eq_top.trans <| by simp
@[simp] lemma ker_inf (f g : Filter α) : ker (f ⊓ g) = ker f ∩ ker g := gi_principal_ker.gc.u_inf
@[simp] lemma ker_iInf (f : ι → Filter α) : ker (⨅ i, f i) = ⋂ i, ker (f i) :=
gi_principal_ker.gc.u_iInf
@[simp] lemma ker_sInf (S : Set (Filter α)) : ker (sInf S) = ⋂ f ∈ S, ker f :=
gi_principal_ker.gc.u_sInf
@[simp] lemma ker_principal (s : Set α) : ker (𝓟 s) = s := gi_principal_ker.u_l_eq _
@[simp] lemma ker_pure (a : α) : ker (pure a) = {a} := by rw [← principal_singleton, ker_principal]
@[simp] lemma ker_comap (m : α → β) (f : Filter β) : ker (comap m f) = m ⁻¹' ker f := by
| ext a
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Ker.lean | 50 | 50 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.CompleteLattice
import Mathlib.Topology.Compactness.Bases
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousMap.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.CompactlyGenerated.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Copy
/-!
# Open sets
## Summary
We define the subtype of open sets in a topological space.
## Main Definitions
### Bundled open sets
- `TopologicalSpace.Opens α` is the type of open subsets of a topological space `α`.
- `TopologicalSpace.Opens.IsBasis` is a predicate saying that a set of `Opens`s form a topological
basis.
- `TopologicalSpace.Opens.comap`: preimage of an open set under a continuous map as a `FrameHom`.
- `Homeomorph.opensCongr`: order-preserving equivalence between open sets in the domain and the
codomain of a homeomorphism.
### Bundled open neighborhoods
- `TopologicalSpace.OpenNhdsOf x` is the type of open subsets of a topological space `α` containing
`x : α`.
- `TopologicalSpace.OpenNhdsOf.comap f x U` is the preimage of open neighborhood `U` of `f x` under
`f : C(α, β)`.
## Main results
We define order structures on both `Opens α` (`CompleteLattice`, `Frame`) and `OpenNhdsOf x`
(`OrderTop`, `DistribLattice`).
## TODO
- Rename `TopologicalSpace.Opens` to `Open`?
- Port the `auto_cases` tactic version (as a plugin if the ported `auto_cases` will allow plugins).
-/
open Filter Function Order Set
open Topology
variable {ι α β γ : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β] [TopologicalSpace γ]
namespace TopologicalSpace
variable (α) in
/-- The type of open subsets of a topological space. -/
structure Opens where
/-- The underlying set of a bundled `TopologicalSpace.Opens` object. -/
carrier : Set α
/-- The `TopologicalSpace.Opens.carrier _` is an open set. -/
is_open' : IsOpen carrier
namespace Opens
instance : SetLike (Opens α) α where
coe := Opens.carrier
coe_injective' := fun ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ _ => by congr
instance : CanLift (Set α) (Opens α) (↑) IsOpen :=
⟨fun s h => ⟨⟨s, h⟩, rfl⟩⟩
instance instSecondCountableOpens [SecondCountableTopology α] (U : Opens α) :
SecondCountableTopology U := inferInstanceAs (SecondCountableTopology U.1)
theorem «forall» {p : Opens α → Prop} : (∀ U, p U) ↔ ∀ (U : Set α) (hU : IsOpen U), p ⟨U, hU⟩ :=
⟨fun h _ _ => h _, fun h _ => h _ _⟩
@[simp] theorem carrier_eq_coe (U : Opens α) : U.1 = ↑U := rfl
/-- the coercion `Opens α → Set α` applied to a pair is the same as taking the first component -/
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk {U : Set α} {hU : IsOpen U} : ↑(⟨U, hU⟩ : Opens α) = U :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk {x : α} {U : Set α} {h : IsOpen U} : x ∈ mk U h ↔ x ∈ U := Iff.rfl
protected theorem nonempty_coeSort {U : Opens α} : Nonempty U ↔ (U : Set α).Nonempty :=
Set.nonempty_coe_sort
-- TODO: should this theorem be proved for a `SetLike`?
protected theorem nonempty_coe {U : Opens α} : (U : Set α).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ U :=
Iff.rfl
@[ext] -- TODO: replace with `∀ x, x ∈ U ↔ x ∈ V`?
theorem ext {U V : Opens α} (h : (U : Set α) = V) : U = V :=
SetLike.coe_injective h
theorem coe_inj {U V : Opens α} : (U : Set α) = V ↔ U = V :=
SetLike.ext'_iff.symm
/-- A version of `Set.inclusion` not requiring definitional abuse -/
abbrev inclusion {U V : Opens α} (h : U ≤ V) : U → V := Set.inclusion h
protected theorem isOpen (U : Opens α) : IsOpen (U : Set α) :=
U.is_open'
@[simp] theorem mk_coe (U : Opens α) : mk (↑U) U.isOpen = U := rfl
/-- See Note [custom simps projection]. -/
def Simps.coe (U : Opens α) : Set α := U
initialize_simps_projections Opens (carrier → coe, as_prefix coe)
/-- The interior of a set, as an element of `Opens`. -/
@[simps]
protected def interior (s : Set α) : Opens α :=
⟨interior s, isOpen_interior⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_interior {s : Set α} {x : α} : x ∈ Opens.interior s ↔ x ∈ _root_.interior s := .rfl
theorem gc : GaloisConnection ((↑) : Opens α → Set α) Opens.interior := fun U _ =>
⟨fun h => interior_maximal h U.isOpen, fun h => le_trans h interior_subset⟩
/-- The galois coinsertion between sets and opens. -/
def gi : GaloisCoinsertion (↑) (@Opens.interior α _) where
choice s hs := ⟨s, interior_eq_iff_isOpen.mp <| le_antisymm interior_subset hs⟩
gc := gc
u_l_le _ := interior_subset
choice_eq _s hs := le_antisymm hs interior_subset
instance : CompleteLattice (Opens α) :=
CompleteLattice.copy (GaloisCoinsertion.liftCompleteLattice gi)
-- le
(fun U V => (U : Set α) ⊆ V) rfl
-- top
⟨univ, isOpen_univ⟩ (ext interior_univ.symm)
-- bot
⟨∅, isOpen_empty⟩ rfl
-- sup
(fun U V => ⟨↑U ∪ ↑V, U.2.union V.2⟩) rfl
-- inf
(fun U V => ⟨↑U ∩ ↑V, U.2.inter V.2⟩)
(funext₂ fun U V => ext (U.2.inter V.2).interior_eq.symm)
-- sSup
(fun S => ⟨⋃ s ∈ S, ↑s, isOpen_biUnion fun s _ => s.2⟩)
(funext fun _ => ext sSup_image.symm)
-- sInf
_ rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_inf_mk {U V : Set α} {hU : IsOpen U} {hV : IsOpen V} :
(⟨U, hU⟩ ⊓ ⟨V, hV⟩ : Opens α) = ⟨U ⊓ V, IsOpen.inter hU hV⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inf (s t : Opens α) : (↑(s ⊓ t) : Set α) = ↑s ∩ ↑t :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma mem_inf {s t : Opens α} {x : α} : x ∈ s ⊓ t ↔ x ∈ s ∧ x ∈ t := Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sup (s t : Opens α) : (↑(s ⊔ t) : Set α) = ↑s ∪ ↑t :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_bot : ((⊥ : Opens α) : Set α) = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma mem_bot {x : α} : x ∈ (⊥ : Opens α) ↔ False := Iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem mk_empty : (⟨∅, isOpen_empty⟩ : Opens α) = ⊥ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_empty {U : Opens α} : (U : Set α) = ∅ ↔ U = ⊥ :=
SetLike.coe_injective.eq_iff' rfl
@[simp]
lemma mem_top (x : α) : x ∈ (⊤ : Opens α) := trivial
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_top : ((⊤ : Opens α) : Set α) = Set.univ :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem mk_univ : (⟨univ, isOpen_univ⟩ : Opens α) = ⊤ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_univ {U : Opens α} : (U : Set α) = univ ↔ U = ⊤ :=
SetLike.coe_injective.eq_iff' rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sSup {S : Set (Opens α)} : (↑(sSup S) : Set α) = ⋃ i ∈ S, ↑i :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_finset_sup (f : ι → Opens α) (s : Finset ι) : (↑(s.sup f) : Set α) = s.sup ((↑) ∘ f) :=
map_finset_sup (⟨⟨(↑), coe_sup⟩, coe_bot⟩ : SupBotHom (Opens α) (Set α)) _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_finset_inf (f : ι → Opens α) (s : Finset ι) : (↑(s.inf f) : Set α) = s.inf ((↑) ∘ f) :=
map_finset_inf (⟨⟨(↑), coe_inf⟩, coe_top⟩ : InfTopHom (Opens α) (Set α)) _ _
instance : Inhabited (Opens α) := ⟨⊥⟩
instance [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Opens α) where
uniq _ := ext <| Subsingleton.elim _ _
instance [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Opens α) where
exists_pair_ne := ⟨⊥, ⊤, mt coe_inj.2 empty_ne_univ⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_iSup {ι} (s : ι → Opens α) : ((⨆ i, s i : Opens α) : Set α) = ⋃ i, s i := by
simp [iSup]
theorem iSup_def {ι} (s : ι → Opens α) : ⨆ i, s i = ⟨⋃ i, s i, isOpen_iUnion fun i => (s i).2⟩ :=
ext <| coe_iSup s
@[simp]
theorem iSup_mk {ι} (s : ι → Set α) (h : ∀ i, IsOpen (s i)) :
(⨆ i, ⟨s i, h i⟩ : Opens α) = ⟨⋃ i, s i, isOpen_iUnion h⟩ :=
iSup_def _
@[simp]
theorem mem_iSup {ι} {x : α} {s : ι → Opens α} : x ∈ iSup s ↔ ∃ i, x ∈ s i := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe]
simp
@[simp]
theorem mem_sSup {Us : Set (Opens α)} {x : α} : x ∈ sSup Us ↔ ∃ u ∈ Us, x ∈ u := by
simp_rw [sSup_eq_iSup, mem_iSup, exists_prop]
/-- Open sets in a topological space form a frame. -/
def frameMinimalAxioms : Frame.MinimalAxioms (Opens α) where
inf_sSup_le_iSup_inf a s :=
(ext <| by simp only [coe_inf, coe_iSup, coe_sSup, Set.inter_iUnion₂]).le
instance instFrame : Frame (Opens α) := .ofMinimalAxioms frameMinimalAxioms
theorem isOpenEmbedding' (U : Opens α) : IsOpenEmbedding (Subtype.val : U → α) :=
U.isOpen.isOpenEmbedding_subtypeVal
theorem isOpenEmbedding_of_le {U V : Opens α} (i : U ≤ V) :
IsOpenEmbedding (Set.inclusion <| SetLike.coe_subset_coe.2 i) where
toIsEmbedding := .inclusion i
isOpen_range := by
rw [Set.range_inclusion i]
exact U.isOpen.preimage continuous_subtype_val
theorem not_nonempty_iff_eq_bot (U : Opens α) : ¬Set.Nonempty (U : Set α) ↔ U = ⊥ := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_bot, ← Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
theorem ne_bot_iff_nonempty (U : Opens α) : U ≠ ⊥ ↔ Set.Nonempty (U : Set α) := by
rw [Ne, ← not_nonempty_iff_eq_bot, not_not]
/-- An open set in the indiscrete topology is either empty or the whole space. -/
theorem eq_bot_or_top {α} [t : TopologicalSpace α] (h : t = ⊤) (U : Opens α) : U = ⊥ ∨ U = ⊤ := by
subst h; letI : TopologicalSpace α := ⊤
rw [← coe_eq_empty, ← coe_eq_univ, ← isOpen_top_iff]
exact U.2
instance [Nonempty α] [Subsingleton α] : IsSimpleOrder (Opens α) where
eq_bot_or_eq_top := eq_bot_or_top <| Subsingleton.elim _ _
/-- A set of `opens α` is a basis if the set of corresponding sets is a topological basis. -/
def IsBasis (B : Set (Opens α)) : Prop :=
IsTopologicalBasis (((↑) : _ → Set α) '' B)
|
theorem isBasis_iff_nbhd {B : Set (Opens α)} :
| Mathlib/Topology/Sets/Opens.lean | 272 | 273 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Image
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.OfMap
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Sets
import Mathlib.Data.List.FinRange
/-!
# Instances for finite types
This file is a collection of basic `Fintype` instances for types such as `Fin`, `Prod` and pi types.
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid
open Function
open Nat
universe u v
variable {α β γ : Type*}
open Finset
instance Fin.fintype (n : ℕ) : Fintype (Fin n) :=
⟨⟨List.finRange n, List.nodup_finRange n⟩, List.mem_finRange⟩
theorem Fin.univ_def (n : ℕ) : (univ : Finset (Fin n)) = ⟨List.finRange n, List.nodup_finRange n⟩ :=
rfl
theorem Finset.val_univ_fin (n : ℕ) : (Finset.univ : Finset (Fin n)).val = List.finRange n := rfl
/-- See also `nonempty_encodable`, `nonempty_denumerable`. -/
theorem nonempty_fintype (α : Type*) [Finite α] : Nonempty (Fintype α) := by
rcases Finite.exists_equiv_fin α with ⟨n, ⟨e⟩⟩
exact ⟨.ofEquiv _ e.symm⟩
@[simp] theorem List.toFinset_finRange (n : ℕ) : (List.finRange n).toFinset = Finset.univ := by
ext; simp
@[simp] theorem Fin.univ_val_map {n : ℕ} (f : Fin n → α) :
Finset.univ.val.map f = List.ofFn f := by
simp [List.ofFn_eq_map, univ_def]
theorem Fin.univ_image_def {n : ℕ} [DecidableEq α] (f : Fin n → α) :
Finset.univ.image f = (List.ofFn f).toFinset := by
simp [Finset.image]
theorem Fin.univ_map_def {n : ℕ} (f : Fin n ↪ α) :
Finset.univ.map f = ⟨List.ofFn f, List.nodup_ofFn.mpr f.injective⟩ := by
simp [Finset.map]
@[simp]
theorem Fin.image_succAbove_univ {n : ℕ} (i : Fin (n + 1)) : univ.image i.succAbove = {i}ᶜ := by
ext m
simp
@[simp]
theorem Fin.image_succ_univ (n : ℕ) : (univ : Finset (Fin n)).image Fin.succ = {0}ᶜ := by
rw [← Fin.succAbove_zero, Fin.image_succAbove_univ]
@[simp]
theorem Fin.image_castSucc (n : ℕ) :
(univ : Finset (Fin n)).image Fin.castSucc = {Fin.last n}ᶜ := by
rw [← Fin.succAbove_last, Fin.image_succAbove_univ]
/- The following three lemmas use `Finset.cons` instead of `insert` and `Finset.map` instead of
`Finset.image` to reduce proof obligations downstream. -/
/-- Embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` by prepending zero to the `univ` -/
theorem Fin.univ_succ (n : ℕ) :
(univ : Finset (Fin (n + 1))) =
Finset.cons 0 (univ.map ⟨Fin.succ, Fin.succ_injective _⟩) (by simp [map_eq_image]) := by
simp [map_eq_image]
/-- Embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` by appending a new `Fin.last n` to the `univ` -/
theorem Fin.univ_castSuccEmb (n : ℕ) :
(univ : Finset (Fin (n + 1))) =
Finset.cons (Fin.last n) (univ.map Fin.castSuccEmb) (by simp [map_eq_image]) := by
simp [map_eq_image]
/-- Embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` by inserting
around a specified pivot `p : Fin (n + 1)` into the `univ` -/
theorem Fin.univ_succAbove (n : ℕ) (p : Fin (n + 1)) :
(univ : Finset (Fin (n + 1))) = Finset.cons p (univ.map <| Fin.succAboveEmb p) (by simp) := by
simp [map_eq_image]
@[simp] theorem Fin.univ_image_get [DecidableEq α] (l : List α) :
Finset.univ.image l.get = l.toFinset := by
simp [univ_image_def]
@[simp] theorem Fin.univ_image_getElem' [DecidableEq β] (l : List α) (f : α → β) :
Finset.univ.image (fun i : Fin l.length => f <| l[(i : Nat)]) = (l.map f).toFinset := by
simp only [univ_image_def, List.ofFn_getElem_eq_map]
theorem Fin.univ_image_get' [DecidableEq β] (l : List α) (f : α → β) :
Finset.univ.image (f <| l.get ·) = (l.map f).toFinset := by
simp
@[instance]
def Unique.fintype {α : Type*} [Unique α] : Fintype α :=
Fintype.ofSubsingleton default
/-- Short-circuit instance to decrease search for `Unique.fintype`,
since that relies on a subsingleton elimination for `Unique`. -/
instance Fintype.subtypeEq (y : α) : Fintype { x // x = y } :=
Fintype.subtype {y} (by simp)
/-- Short-circuit instance to decrease search for `Unique.fintype`,
since that relies on a subsingleton elimination for `Unique`. -/
instance Fintype.subtypeEq' (y : α) : Fintype { x // y = x } :=
Fintype.subtype {y} (by simp [eq_comm])
theorem Fintype.univ_empty : @univ Empty _ = ∅ :=
rfl
theorem Fintype.univ_pempty : @univ PEmpty _ = ∅ :=
rfl
instance Unit.fintype : Fintype Unit :=
Fintype.ofSubsingleton ()
theorem Fintype.univ_unit : @univ Unit _ = {()} :=
rfl
instance PUnit.fintype : Fintype PUnit :=
Fintype.ofSubsingleton PUnit.unit
theorem Fintype.univ_punit : @univ PUnit _ = {PUnit.unit} :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Fintype.univ_bool : @univ Bool _ = {true, false} :=
rfl
/-- Given that `α × β` is a fintype, `α` is also a fintype. -/
def Fintype.prodLeft {α β} [DecidableEq α] [Fintype (α × β)] [Nonempty β] : Fintype α :=
⟨(@univ (α × β) _).image Prod.fst, fun a => by simp⟩
/-- Given that `α × β` is a fintype, `β` is also a fintype. -/
def Fintype.prodRight {α β} [DecidableEq β] [Fintype (α × β)] [Nonempty α] : Fintype β :=
⟨(@univ (α × β) _).image Prod.snd, fun b => by simp⟩
instance ULift.fintype (α : Type*) [Fintype α] : Fintype (ULift α) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv _ Equiv.ulift.symm
instance PLift.fintype (α : Type*) [Fintype α] : Fintype (PLift α) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv _ Equiv.plift.symm
instance PLift.fintypeProp (p : Prop) [Decidable p] : Fintype (PLift p) :=
⟨if h : p then {⟨h⟩} else ∅, fun ⟨h⟩ => by simp [h]⟩
instance Quotient.fintype [Fintype α] (s : Setoid α) [DecidableRel ((· ≈ ·) : α → α → Prop)] :
Fintype (Quotient s) :=
Fintype.ofSurjective Quotient.mk'' Quotient.mk''_surjective
instance PSigma.fintypePropLeft {α : Prop} {β : α → Type*} [Decidable α] [∀ a, Fintype (β a)] :
Fintype (Σ'a, β a) :=
if h : α then Fintype.ofEquiv (β h) ⟨fun x => ⟨h, x⟩, PSigma.snd, fun _ => rfl, fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl⟩
else ⟨∅, fun x => (h x.1).elim⟩
instance PSigma.fintypePropRight {α : Type*} {β : α → Prop} [∀ a, Decidable (β a)] [Fintype α] :
Fintype (Σ'a, β a) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv { a // β a }
⟨fun ⟨x, y⟩ => ⟨x, y⟩, fun ⟨x, y⟩ => ⟨x, y⟩, fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl, fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl⟩
instance PSigma.fintypePropProp {α : Prop} {β : α → Prop} [Decidable α] [∀ a, Decidable (β a)] :
Fintype (Σ'a, β a) :=
if h : ∃ a, β a then ⟨{⟨h.fst, h.snd⟩}, fun ⟨_, _⟩ => by simp⟩ else ⟨∅, fun ⟨x, y⟩ =>
(h ⟨x, y⟩).elim⟩
instance pfunFintype (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (α : p → Type*) [∀ hp, Fintype (α hp)] :
Fintype (∀ hp : p, α hp) :=
if hp : p then Fintype.ofEquiv (α hp) ⟨fun a _ => a, fun f => f hp, fun _ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
else ⟨singleton fun h => (hp h).elim, fun h => mem_singleton.2
(funext fun x => by contradiction)⟩
section Trunc
/-- For `s : Multiset α`, we can lift the existential statement that `∃ x, x ∈ s` to a `Trunc α`.
-/
def truncOfMultisetExistsMem {α} (s : Multiset α) : (∃ x, x ∈ s) → Trunc α :=
Quotient.recOnSubsingleton s fun l h =>
match l, h with
| [], _ => False.elim (by tauto)
| a :: _, _ => Trunc.mk a
/-- A `Nonempty` `Fintype` constructively contains an element.
-/
def truncOfNonemptyFintype (α) [Nonempty α] [Fintype α] : Trunc α :=
truncOfMultisetExistsMem Finset.univ.val (by simp)
/-- By iterating over the elements of a fintype, we can lift an existential statement `∃ a, P a`
to `Trunc (Σ' a, P a)`, containing data.
-/
def truncSigmaOfExists {α} [Fintype α] {P : α → Prop} [DecidablePred P] (h : ∃ a, P a) :
Trunc (Σ'a, P a) :=
@truncOfNonemptyFintype (Σ'a, P a) ((Exists.elim h) fun a ha => ⟨⟨a, ha⟩⟩) _
end Trunc
namespace Multiset
variable [Fintype α] [Fintype β]
@[simp]
theorem count_univ [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : count a Finset.univ.val = 1 :=
count_eq_one_of_mem Finset.univ.nodup (Finset.mem_univ _)
@[simp]
theorem map_univ_val_equiv (e : α ≃ β) :
map e univ.val = univ.val := by
rw [← congr_arg Finset.val (Finset.map_univ_equiv e), Finset.map_val, Equiv.coe_toEmbedding]
/-- For functions on finite sets, they are bijections iff they map universes into universes. -/
@[simp]
theorem bijective_iff_map_univ_eq_univ (f : α → β) :
f.Bijective ↔ map f (Finset.univ : Finset α).val = univ.val :=
⟨fun bij ↦ congr_arg (·.val) (map_univ_equiv <| Equiv.ofBijective f bij),
fun eq ↦ ⟨
fun a₁ a₂ ↦ inj_on_of_nodup_map (eq.symm ▸ univ.nodup) _ (mem_univ a₁) _ (mem_univ a₂),
fun b ↦ have ⟨a, _, h⟩ := mem_map.mp (eq.symm ▸ mem_univ_val b); ⟨a, h⟩⟩⟩
end Multiset
/-- Auxiliary definition to show `exists_seq_of_forall_finset_exists`. -/
noncomputable def seqOfForallFinsetExistsAux {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] (P : α → Prop)
(r : α → α → Prop) (h : ∀ s : Finset α, ∃ y, (∀ x ∈ s, P x) → P y ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, r x y) : ℕ → α
| n =>
Classical.choose
(h
(Finset.image (fun i : Fin n => seqOfForallFinsetExistsAux P r h i)
(Finset.univ : Finset (Fin n))))
/-- Induction principle to build a sequence, by adding one point at a time satisfying a given
relation with respect to all the previously chosen points.
More precisely, Assume that, for any finite set `s`, one can find another point satisfying
some relation `r` with respect to all the points in `s`. Then one may construct a
function `f : ℕ → α` such that `r (f m) (f n)` holds whenever `m < n`.
We also ensure that all constructed points satisfy a given predicate `P`. -/
theorem exists_seq_of_forall_finset_exists {α : Type*} (P : α → Prop) (r : α → α → Prop)
(h : ∀ s : Finset α, (∀ x ∈ s, P x) → ∃ y, P y ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, r x y) :
∃ f : ℕ → α, (∀ n, P (f n)) ∧ ∀ m n, m < n → r (f m) (f n) := by
classical
have : Nonempty α := by
rcases h ∅ (by simp) with ⟨y, _⟩
exact ⟨y⟩
choose! F hF using h
have h' : ∀ s : Finset α, ∃ y, (∀ x ∈ s, P x) → P y ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, r x y := fun s => ⟨F s, hF s⟩
set f := seqOfForallFinsetExistsAux P r h' with hf
have A : ∀ n : ℕ, P (f n) := by
intro n
induction' n using Nat.strong_induction_on with n IH
have IH' : ∀ x : Fin n, P (f x) := fun n => IH n.1 n.2
rw [hf, seqOfForallFinsetExistsAux]
exact
(Classical.choose_spec
(h' (Finset.image (fun i : Fin n => f i) (Finset.univ : Finset (Fin n))))
(by simp [IH'])).1
refine ⟨f, A, fun m n hmn => ?_⟩
conv_rhs => rw [hf]
rw [seqOfForallFinsetExistsAux]
apply
(Classical.choose_spec
(h' (Finset.image (fun i : Fin n => f i) (Finset.univ : Finset (Fin n)))) (by simp [A])).2
exact Finset.mem_image.2 ⟨⟨m, hmn⟩, Finset.mem_univ _, rfl⟩
/-- Induction principle to build a sequence, by adding one point at a time satisfying a given
symmetric relation with respect to all the previously chosen points.
More precisely, Assume that, for any finite set `s`, one can find another point satisfying
some relation `r` with respect to all the points in `s`. Then one may construct a
function `f : ℕ → α` such that `r (f m) (f n)` holds whenever `m ≠ n`.
We also ensure that all constructed points satisfy a given predicate `P`. -/
theorem exists_seq_of_forall_finset_exists' {α : Type*} (P : α → Prop) (r : α → α → Prop)
[IsSymm α r] (h : ∀ s : Finset α, (∀ x ∈ s, P x) → ∃ y, P y ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, r x y) :
∃ f : ℕ → α, (∀ n, P (f n)) ∧ Pairwise (r on f) := by
rcases exists_seq_of_forall_finset_exists P r h with ⟨f, hf, hf'⟩
refine ⟨f, hf, fun m n hmn => ?_⟩
rcases lt_trichotomy m n with (h | rfl | h)
· exact hf' m n h
· exact (hmn rfl).elim
· unfold Function.onFun
apply symm
exact hf' n m h
| Mathlib/Data/Fintype/Basic.lean | 692 | 693 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Sébastien Gouëzel, Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Field
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.MonoidLocalization.Basic
/-!
# Properties of inner product spaces
This file proves many basic properties of inner product spaces (real or complex).
## Main results
- `inner_mul_inner_self_le`: the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality (one of many variants).
- `norm_inner_eq_norm_iff`: the equality criteion in the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality (also in many
variants).
- `inner_eq_sum_norm_sq_div_four`: the polarization identity.
## Tags
inner product space, Hilbert space, norm
-/
noncomputable section
open RCLike Real Filter Topology ComplexConjugate Finsupp
open LinearMap (BilinForm)
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
section BasicProperties_Seminormed
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local postfix:90 "†" => starRingEnd _
export InnerProductSpace (norm_sq_eq_re_inner)
@[simp]
theorem inner_conj_symm (x y : E) : ⟪y, x⟫† = ⟪x, y⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.conj_inner_symm _ _
theorem real_inner_comm (x y : F) : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_conj_symm ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
theorem inner_eq_zero_symm {x y : E} : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0 ↔ ⟪y, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm]
exact star_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_im (x : E) : im ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 := by rw [← @ofReal_inj 𝕜, im_eq_conj_sub]; simp
theorem inner_add_left (x y z : E) : ⟪x + y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ + ⟪y, z⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.add_left _ _ _
theorem inner_add_right (x y z : E) : ⟪x, y + z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪x, z⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_add_left, RingHom.map_add]
simp only [inner_conj_symm]
theorem inner_re_symm (x y : E) : re ⟪x, y⟫ = re ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
theorem inner_im_symm (x y : E) : im ⟪x, y⟫ = -im ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_im]
section Algebra
variable {𝕝 : Type*} [CommSemiring 𝕝] [StarRing 𝕝] [Algebra 𝕝 𝕜] [Module 𝕝 E]
[IsScalarTower 𝕝 𝕜 E] [StarModule 𝕝 𝕜]
/-- See `inner_smul_left` for the common special when `𝕜 = 𝕝`. -/
lemma inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← algebraMap_smul 𝕜 r, InnerProductSpace.smul_left, starRingEnd_apply, starRingEnd_apply,
← algebraMap_star_comm, ← smul_eq_mul, algebraMap_smul]
/-- Special case of `inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul` when the acting ring has a trivial star
(eg `ℕ`, `ℤ`, `ℚ≥0`, `ℚ`, `ℝ`). -/
lemma inner_smul_left_eq_smul [TrivialStar 𝕝] (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul, starRingEnd_apply, star_trivial]
/-- See `inner_smul_right` for the common special when `𝕜 = 𝕝`. -/
lemma inner_smul_right_eq_smul (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul, starRingEnd_apply, starRingEnd_apply,
star_smul, star_star, ← starRingEnd_apply, inner_conj_symm]
end Algebra
/-- See `inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul` for the case of a general algebra action. -/
theorem inner_smul_left (x y : E) (r : 𝕜) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul ..
theorem real_inner_smul_left (x y : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪r • x, y⟫_ℝ = r * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
inner_smul_left _ _ _
theorem inner_smul_real_left (x y : E) (r : ℝ) : ⟪(r : 𝕜) • x, y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_left, conj_ofReal, Algebra.smul_def]
/-- See `inner_smul_right_eq_smul` for the case of a general algebra action. -/
theorem inner_smul_right (x y : E) (r : 𝕜) : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
inner_smul_right_eq_smul ..
theorem real_inner_smul_right (x y : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, r • y⟫_ℝ = r * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
inner_smul_right _ _ _
theorem inner_smul_real_right (x y : E) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, (r : 𝕜) • y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_right, Algebra.smul_def]
/-- The inner product as a sesquilinear form.
Note that in the case `𝕜 = ℝ` this is a bilinear form. -/
@[simps!]
def sesqFormOfInner : E →ₗ[𝕜] E →ₗ⋆[𝕜] 𝕜 :=
LinearMap.mk₂'ₛₗ (RingHom.id 𝕜) (starRingEnd _) (fun x y => ⟪y, x⟫)
(fun _x _y _z => inner_add_right _ _ _) (fun _r _x _y => inner_smul_right _ _ _)
(fun _x _y _z => inner_add_left _ _ _) fun _r _x _y => inner_smul_left _ _ _
/-- The real inner product as a bilinear form.
Note that unlike `sesqFormOfInner`, this does not reverse the order of the arguments. -/
@[simps!]
def bilinFormOfRealInner : BilinForm ℝ F := sesqFormOfInner.flip
/-- An inner product with a sum on the left. -/
theorem sum_inner {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪∑ i ∈ s, f i, x⟫ = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟪f i, x⟫ :=
map_sum (sesqFormOfInner (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E) x) _ _
/-- An inner product with a sum on the right. -/
theorem inner_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪x, ∑ i ∈ s, f i⟫ = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟪x, f i⟫ :=
map_sum (LinearMap.flip sesqFormOfInner x) _ _
/-- An inner product with a sum on the left, `Finsupp` version. -/
protected theorem Finsupp.sum_inner {ι : Type*} (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • v i, x⟫ = l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => conj a • ⟪v i, x⟫ := by
convert sum_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) l.support (fun a => l a • v a) x
simp only [inner_smul_left, Finsupp.sum, smul_eq_mul]
/-- An inner product with a sum on the right, `Finsupp` version. -/
protected theorem Finsupp.inner_sum {ι : Type*} (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪x, l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • v i⟫ = l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • ⟪x, v i⟫ := by
convert inner_sum (𝕜 := 𝕜) l.support (fun a => l a • v a) x
simp only [inner_smul_right, Finsupp.sum, smul_eq_mul]
protected theorem DFinsupp.sum_inner {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, AddZeroClass (α i)] [∀ (i) (x : α i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (f : ∀ i, α i → E)
(l : Π₀ i, α i) (x : E) : ⟪l.sum f, x⟫ = l.sum fun i a => ⟪f i a, x⟫ := by
simp +contextual only [DFinsupp.sum, sum_inner, smul_eq_mul]
protected theorem DFinsupp.inner_sum {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, AddZeroClass (α i)] [∀ (i) (x : α i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (f : ∀ i, α i → E)
(l : Π₀ i, α i) (x : E) : ⟪x, l.sum f⟫ = l.sum fun i a => ⟪x, f i a⟫ := by
simp +contextual only [DFinsupp.sum, inner_sum, smul_eq_mul]
@[simp]
theorem inner_zero_left (x : E) : ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← zero_smul 𝕜 (0 : E), inner_smul_left, RingHom.map_zero, zero_mul]
theorem inner_re_zero_left (x : E) : re ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
simp only [inner_zero_left, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
@[simp]
theorem inner_zero_right (x : E) : ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_zero_left, RingHom.map_zero]
theorem inner_re_zero_right (x : E) : re ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
simp only [inner_zero_right, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
theorem inner_self_nonneg {x : E} : 0 ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ :=
PreInnerProductSpace.toCore.re_inner_nonneg x
theorem real_inner_self_nonneg {x : F} : 0 ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_self_nonneg ℝ F _ _ _ x
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_ofReal_re (x : E) : (re ⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ :=
((RCLike.is_real_TFAE (⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜)).out 2 3).2 (inner_self_im (𝕜 := 𝕜) x)
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K (x : E) : ⟪x, x⟫ = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 := by
rw [← inner_self_ofReal_re, ← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, ofReal_pow]
theorem inner_self_re_eq_norm (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖⟪x, x⟫‖ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← inner_self_ofReal_re]
symm
exact norm_of_nonneg inner_self_nonneg
theorem inner_self_ofReal_norm (x : E) : (‖⟪x, x⟫‖ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ := by
rw [← inner_self_re_eq_norm]
exact inner_self_ofReal_re _
theorem real_inner_self_abs (x : F) : |⟪x, x⟫_ℝ| = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_self_ofReal_norm ℝ F _ _ _ x
theorem norm_inner_symm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, norm_conj]
@[simp]
theorem inner_neg_left (x y : E) : ⟪-x, y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← neg_one_smul 𝕜 x, inner_smul_left]
simp
@[simp]
theorem inner_neg_right (x y : E) : ⟪x, -y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_neg_left]; simp only [RingHom.map_neg, inner_conj_symm]
theorem inner_neg_neg (x y : E) : ⟪-x, -y⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ := by simp
theorem inner_self_conj (x : E) : ⟪x, x⟫† = ⟪x, x⟫ := inner_conj_symm _ _
theorem inner_sub_left (x y z : E) : ⟪x - y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ - ⟪y, z⟫ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_left]
theorem inner_sub_right (x y z : E) : ⟪x, y - z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪x, z⟫ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_right]
theorem inner_mul_symm_re_eq_norm (x y : E) : re (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫) = ‖⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫‖ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, mul_comm]
exact re_eq_norm_of_mul_conj (inner y x)
/-- Expand `⟪x + y, x + y⟫` -/
theorem inner_add_add_self (x y : E) : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ := by
simp only [inner_add_left, inner_add_right]; ring
/-- Expand `⟪x + y, x + y⟫_ℝ` -/
theorem real_inner_add_add_self (x y : F) :
⟪x + y, x + y⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := by
have : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm]; rfl
simp only [inner_add_add_self, this, add_left_inj]
ring
-- Expand `⟪x - y, x - y⟫`
theorem inner_sub_sub_self (x y : E) : ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ := by
simp only [inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right]; ring
/-- Expand `⟪x - y, x - y⟫_ℝ` -/
theorem real_inner_sub_sub_self (x y : F) :
⟪x - y, x - y⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := by
have : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm]; rfl
simp only [inner_sub_sub_self, this, add_left_inj]
ring
/-- Parallelogram law -/
theorem parallelogram_law {x y : E} : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ + ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = 2 * (⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫) := by
simp only [inner_add_add_self, inner_sub_sub_self]
ring
/-- **Cauchy–Schwarz inequality**. -/
theorem inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ * ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ * re ⟪y, y⟫ :=
letI cd : PreInnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := PreInnerProductSpace.toCore
InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_mul_inner_self_le x y
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality for real inner products. -/
theorem real_inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : F) : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ * ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ :=
calc
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ‖⟪x, y⟫_ℝ‖ * ‖⟪y, x⟫_ℝ‖ := by
rw [real_inner_comm y, ← norm_mul]
exact le_abs_self _
_ ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ * ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := @inner_mul_inner_self_le ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
end BasicProperties_Seminormed
section BasicProperties
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
export InnerProductSpace (norm_sq_eq_re_inner)
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_eq_zero {x : E} : ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
rw [inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, sq_eq_zero_iff, ofReal_eq_zero, norm_eq_zero]
theorem inner_self_ne_zero {x : E} : ⟪x, x⟫ ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
inner_self_eq_zero.not
variable (𝕜)
theorem ext_inner_left {x y : E} (h : ∀ v, ⟪v, x⟫ = ⟪v, y⟫) : x = y := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜, inner_sub_right, sub_eq_zero, h (x - y)]
theorem ext_inner_right {x y : E} (h : ∀ v, ⟪x, v⟫ = ⟪y, v⟫) : x = y := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜, inner_sub_left, sub_eq_zero, h (x - y)]
variable {𝕜}
@[simp]
theorem re_inner_self_nonpos {x : E} : re ⟪x, x⟫ ≤ 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
rw [← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, (sq_nonneg _).le_iff_eq, sq_eq_zero_iff, norm_eq_zero]
@[simp]
lemma re_inner_self_pos {x : E} : 0 < re ⟪x, x⟫ ↔ x ≠ 0 := by
simpa [-re_inner_self_nonpos] using re_inner_self_nonpos (𝕜 := 𝕜) (x := x).not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias inner_self_nonpos := re_inner_self_nonpos
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias inner_self_pos := re_inner_self_pos
open scoped InnerProductSpace in
theorem real_inner_self_nonpos {x : F} : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 ↔ x = 0 := re_inner_self_nonpos (𝕜 := ℝ)
open scoped InnerProductSpace in
theorem real_inner_self_pos {x : F} : 0 < ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ ↔ x ≠ 0 := re_inner_self_pos (𝕜 := ℝ)
/-- A family of vectors is linearly independent if they are nonzero
and orthogonal. -/
theorem linearIndependent_of_ne_zero_of_inner_eq_zero {ι : Type*} {v : ι → E} (hz : ∀ i, v i ≠ 0)
(ho : Pairwise fun i j => ⟪v i, v j⟫ = 0) : LinearIndependent 𝕜 v := by
rw [linearIndependent_iff']
intro s g hg i hi
have h' : g i * inner (v i) (v i) = inner (v i) (∑ j ∈ s, g j • v j) := by
rw [inner_sum]
symm
convert Finset.sum_eq_single (M := 𝕜) i ?_ ?_
· rw [inner_smul_right]
· intro j _hj hji
rw [inner_smul_right, ho hji.symm, mul_zero]
· exact fun h => False.elim (h hi)
simpa [hg, hz] using h'
end BasicProperties
section Norm_Seminormed
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local notation "IK" => @RCLike.I 𝕜 _
theorem norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (x : E) : ‖x‖ = √(re ⟪x, x⟫) :=
calc
‖x‖ = √(‖x‖ ^ 2) := (sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)).symm
_ = √(re ⟪x, x⟫) := congr_arg _ (norm_sq_eq_re_inner _)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias norm_eq_sqrt_inner := norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner
theorem norm_eq_sqrt_real_inner (x : F) : ‖x‖ = √⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner ℝ _ _ _ _ x
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ := by
rw [@norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner 𝕜, ← sqrt_mul inner_self_nonneg (re ⟪x, x⟫),
sqrt_mul_self inner_self_nonneg]
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_sq (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [pow_two, inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
theorem real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm (x : F) : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ := by
have h := @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm ℝ F _ _ _ x
simpa using h
theorem real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq (x : F) : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [pow_two, real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_sq (x y : E) : ‖x + y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 + 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
repeat' rw [sq (M := ℝ), ← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜]
rw [inner_add_add_self, two_mul]
simp only [add_assoc, add_left_inj, add_right_inj, AddMonoidHom.map_add]
rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
alias norm_add_pow_two := norm_add_sq
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_sq_real (x y : F) : ‖x + y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
have h := @norm_add_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
alias norm_add_pow_two_real := norm_add_sq_real
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_mul_self (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
repeat' rw [← sq (M := ℝ)]
exact norm_add_sq _ _
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_mul_self_real (x y : F) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
have h := @norm_add_mul_self ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_sq (x y : E) : ‖x - y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 - 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, @norm_add_sq 𝕜 _ _ _ _ x (-y), norm_neg, inner_neg_right, map_neg, mul_neg,
sub_eq_add_neg]
alias norm_sub_pow_two := norm_sub_sq
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_real (x y : F) : ‖x - y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 :=
@norm_sub_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ _ _
alias norm_sub_pow_two_real := norm_sub_sq_real
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_mul_self (x y : E) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
repeat' rw [← sq (M := ℝ)]
exact norm_sub_sq _ _
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_mul_self_real (x y : F) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
have h := @norm_sub_mul_self ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem norm_inner_le_norm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := by
rw [norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) x, norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) y]
letI : PreInnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := PreInnerProductSpace.toCore
exact InnerProductSpace.Core.norm_inner_le_norm x y
theorem nnnorm_inner_le_nnnorm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖₊ ≤ ‖x‖₊ * ‖y‖₊ :=
norm_inner_le_norm x y
theorem re_inner_le_norm (x y : E) : re ⟪x, y⟫ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
le_trans (re_le_norm (inner x y)) (norm_inner_le_norm x y)
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem abs_real_inner_le_norm (x y : F) : |⟪x, y⟫_ℝ| ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(Real.norm_eq_abs _).ge.trans (norm_inner_le_norm x y)
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem real_inner_le_norm (x y : F) : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
le_trans (le_abs_self _) (abs_real_inner_le_norm _ _)
lemma inner_eq_zero_of_left {x : E} (y : E) (h : ‖x‖ = 0) : ⟪x, y⟫_𝕜 = 0 := by
rw [← norm_eq_zero]
refine le_antisymm ?_ (by positivity)
exact norm_inner_le_norm _ _ |>.trans <| by simp [h]
lemma inner_eq_zero_of_right (x : E) {y : E} (h : ‖y‖ = 0) : ⟪x, y⟫_𝕜 = 0 := by
rw [inner_eq_zero_symm, inner_eq_zero_of_left _ h]
variable (𝕜)
include 𝕜 in
theorem parallelogram_law_with_norm (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ + ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = 2 * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) := by
simp only [← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜]
rw [← re.map_add, parallelogram_law, two_mul, two_mul]
simp only [re.map_add]
include 𝕜 in
theorem parallelogram_law_with_nnnorm (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖₊ * ‖x + y‖₊ + ‖x - y‖₊ * ‖x - y‖₊ = 2 * (‖x‖₊ * ‖x‖₊ + ‖y‖₊ * ‖y‖₊) :=
Subtype.ext <| parallelogram_law_with_norm 𝕜 x y
variable {𝕜}
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) / 2 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 2 := by
rw [@norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_four (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 4 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, @norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The imaginary part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem im_inner_eq_norm_sub_i_smul_mul_self_sub_norm_add_i_smul_mul_self_div_four (x y : E) :
im ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x - IK • y‖ * ‖x - IK • y‖ - ‖x + IK • y‖ * ‖x + IK • y‖) / 4 := by
simp only [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, @norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜, inner_smul_right, I_mul_re]
ring
/-- Polarization identity: The inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem inner_eq_sum_norm_sq_div_four (x y : E) :
⟪x, y⟫ = ((‖x + y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 - (‖x - y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 +
((‖x - IK • y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 - (‖x + IK • y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2) * IK) / 4 := by
rw [← re_add_im ⟪x, y⟫, re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_four,
im_inner_eq_norm_sub_i_smul_mul_self_sub_norm_add_i_smul_mul_self_div_four]
push_cast
simp only [sq, ← mul_div_right_comm, ← add_div]
/-- Polarization identity: The real inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem real_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) / 2 :=
re_to_real.symm.trans <|
re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two x y
/-- Polarization identity: The real inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem real_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 2 :=
re_to_real.symm.trans <|
re_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two x y
/-- Pythagorean theorem, if-and-only-if vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (x y : F) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self ℝ, add_right_cancel_iff, add_eq_left, mul_eq_zero]
norm_num
/-- Pythagorean theorem, if-and-if vector inner product form using square roots. -/
theorem norm_add_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero {x y : F} :
‖x + y‖ = √(‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [← norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero, eq_comm, sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq,
eq_comm] <;> positivity
/-- Pythagorean theorem, vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_of_inner_eq_zero (x y : E) (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, add_right_cancel_iff, add_eq_left, mul_eq_zero]
apply Or.inr
simp only [h, zero_re']
/-- Pythagorean theorem, vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real {x y : F} (h : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero x y).2 h
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, if-and-only-if vector
inner product form. -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (x y : F) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [@norm_sub_mul_self ℝ, add_right_cancel_iff, sub_eq_add_neg, add_eq_left, neg_eq_zero,
mul_eq_zero]
norm_num
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, if-and-if vector inner product form using square
roots. -/
theorem norm_sub_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero {x y : F} :
‖x - y‖ = √(‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [← norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero, eq_comm, sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq,
eq_comm] <;> positivity
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, vector inner product
form. -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real {x y : F} (h : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero x y).2 h
/-- The sum and difference of two vectors are orthogonal if and only
if they have the same norm. -/
theorem real_inner_add_sub_eq_zero_iff (x y : F) : ⟪x + y, x - y⟫_ℝ = 0 ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)]
simp only [← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm ℝ, inner_add_left, inner_sub_right, real_inner_comm y x,
sub_eq_zero, re_to_real]
constructor
· intro h
rw [add_comm] at h
linarith
· intro h
linarith
/-- Given two orthogonal vectors, their sum and difference have equal norms. -/
theorem norm_sub_eq_norm_add {v w : E} (h : ⟪v, w⟫ = 0) : ‖w - v‖ = ‖w + v‖ := by
rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)]
simp only [h, ← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜, sub_neg_eq_add, sub_zero, map_sub, zero_re',
zero_sub, add_zero, map_add, inner_add_right, inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right, inner_re_symm,
zero_add]
/-- The real inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value at most 1. -/
theorem abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one (x y : F) : |⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)| ≤ 1 := by
rw [abs_div, abs_mul, abs_norm, abs_norm]
exact div_le_one_of_le₀ (abs_real_inner_le_norm x y) (by positivity)
/-- The inner product of a vector with a multiple of itself. -/
theorem real_inner_smul_self_left (x : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪r • x, x⟫_ℝ = r * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖) := by
rw [real_inner_smul_left, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
/-- The inner product of a vector with a multiple of itself. -/
theorem real_inner_smul_self_right (x : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ = r * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖) := by
rw [inner_smul_right, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
/-- The inner product of two weighted sums, where the weights in each
sum add to 0, in terms of the norms of pairwise differences. -/
theorem inner_sum_smul_sum_smul_of_sum_eq_zero {ι₁ : Type*} {s₁ : Finset ι₁} {w₁ : ι₁ → ℝ}
(v₁ : ι₁ → F) (h₁ : ∑ i ∈ s₁, w₁ i = 0) {ι₂ : Type*} {s₂ : Finset ι₂} {w₂ : ι₂ → ℝ}
(v₂ : ι₂ → F) (h₂ : ∑ i ∈ s₂, w₂ i = 0) :
⟪∑ i₁ ∈ s₁, w₁ i₁ • v₁ i₁, ∑ i₂ ∈ s₂, w₂ i₂ • v₂ i₂⟫_ℝ =
(-∑ i₁ ∈ s₁, ∑ i₂ ∈ s₂, w₁ i₁ * w₂ i₂ * (‖v₁ i₁ - v₂ i₂‖ * ‖v₁ i₁ - v₂ i₂‖)) / 2 := by
simp_rw [sum_inner, inner_sum, real_inner_smul_left, real_inner_smul_right,
real_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two, ← div_sub_div_same,
← div_add_div_same, mul_sub_left_distrib, left_distrib, Finset.sum_sub_distrib,
Finset.sum_add_distrib, ← Finset.mul_sum, ← Finset.sum_mul, h₁, h₂, zero_mul,
mul_zero, Finset.sum_const_zero, zero_add, zero_sub, Finset.mul_sum, neg_div,
Finset.sum_div, mul_div_assoc, mul_assoc]
end Norm_Seminormed
section Norm
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
variable {ι : Type*}
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-- Formula for the distance between the images of two nonzero points under an inversion with center
zero. See also `EuclideanGeometry.dist_inversion_inversion` for inversions around a general
point. -/
theorem dist_div_norm_sq_smul {x y : F} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (R : ℝ) :
dist ((R / ‖x‖) ^ 2 • x) ((R / ‖y‖) ^ 2 • y) = R ^ 2 / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) * dist x y :=
calc
dist ((R / ‖x‖) ^ 2 • x) ((R / ‖y‖) ^ 2 • y) =
√(‖(R / ‖x‖) ^ 2 • x - (R / ‖y‖) ^ 2 • y‖ ^ 2) := by
rw [dist_eq_norm, sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)]
_ = √((R ^ 2 / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)) ^ 2 * ‖x - y‖ ^ 2) :=
congr_arg sqrt <| by
field_simp [sq, norm_sub_mul_self_real, norm_smul, real_inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right,
Real.norm_of_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _)]
ring
_ = R ^ 2 / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) * dist x y := by
rw [sqrt_mul, sqrt_sq, sqrt_sq, dist_eq_norm] <;> positivity
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a nonzero multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has absolute value
1. -/
theorem norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul {x : E} {r : 𝕜} (hx : x ≠ 0)
(hr : r ≠ 0) : ‖⟪x, r • x⟫‖ / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = 1 := by
have hx' : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := by simp [hx]
have hr' : ‖r‖ ≠ 0 := by simp [hr]
rw [inner_smul_right, norm_mul, ← inner_self_re_eq_norm, inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, norm_smul]
rw [← mul_assoc, ← div_div, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hx', ← div_div, mul_comm,
mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hr', div_self hx']
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a nonzero multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has absolute value
1. -/
theorem abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul {x : F} {r : ℝ}
(hx : x ≠ 0) (hr : r ≠ 0) : |⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ| / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = 1 :=
norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul hx hr
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a positive multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has value 1. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_pos_mul {x : F} {r : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0)
(hr : 0 < r) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = 1 := by
rw [real_inner_smul_self_right, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, ← mul_assoc ‖x‖, mul_comm _ |r|,
mul_assoc, abs_of_nonneg hr.le, div_self]
exact mul_ne_zero hr.ne' (mul_self_ne_zero.2 (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx))
/-- The inner product of a nonzero vector with a negative multiple of
itself, divided by the product of their norms, has value -1. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_of_ne_zero_of_neg_mul {x : F} {r : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0)
(hr : r < 0) : ⟪x, r • x⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖r • x‖) = -1 := by
rw [real_inner_smul_self_right, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, ← mul_assoc ‖x‖, mul_comm _ |r|,
mul_assoc, abs_of_neg hr, neg_mul, div_neg_eq_neg_div, div_self]
exact mul_ne_zero hr.ne (mul_self_ne_zero.2 (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx))
theorem norm_inner_eq_norm_tfae (x y : E) :
List.TFAE [‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖,
x = 0 ∨ y = (⟪x, y⟫ / ⟪x, x⟫) • x,
x = 0 ∨ ∃ r : 𝕜, y = r • x,
x = 0 ∨ y ∈ 𝕜 ∙ x] := by
tfae_have 1 → 2 := by
refine fun h => or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun hx₀ => ?_
have : ‖x‖ ^ 2 ≠ 0 := pow_ne_zero _ (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx₀)
rw [← sq_eq_sq₀, mul_pow, ← mul_right_inj' this, eq_comm, ← sub_eq_zero, ← mul_sub] at h <;>
try positivity
simp only [@norm_sq_eq_re_inner 𝕜] at h
letI : InnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := InnerProductSpace.toCore
erw [← InnerProductSpace.Core.cauchy_schwarz_aux (𝕜 := 𝕜) (F := E)] at h
rw [InnerProductSpace.Core.normSq_eq_zero, sub_eq_zero] at h
rw [div_eq_inv_mul, mul_smul, h, inv_smul_smul₀]
rwa [inner_self_ne_zero]
tfae_have 2 → 3 := fun h => h.imp_right fun h' => ⟨_, h'⟩
tfae_have 3 → 1 := by
rintro (rfl | ⟨r, rfl⟩) <;>
simp [inner_smul_right, norm_smul, inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm,
sq, mul_left_comm]
tfae_have 3 ↔ 4 := by simp only [Submodule.mem_span_singleton, eq_comm]
tfae_finish
/-- If the inner product of two vectors is equal to the product of their norms, then the two vectors
are multiples of each other. One form of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz.
Compare `inner_eq_norm_mul_iff`, which takes the stronger hypothesis `⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`. -/
theorem norm_inner_eq_norm_iff {x y : E} (hx₀ : x ≠ 0) (hy₀ : y ≠ 0) :
‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ∃ r : 𝕜, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x :=
calc
‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ x = 0 ∨ ∃ r : 𝕜, y = r • x :=
(@norm_inner_eq_norm_tfae 𝕜 _ _ _ _ x y).out 0 2
_ ↔ ∃ r : 𝕜, y = r • x := or_iff_right hx₀
_ ↔ ∃ r : 𝕜, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x :=
⟨fun ⟨r, h⟩ => ⟨r, fun hr₀ => hy₀ <| h.symm ▸ smul_eq_zero.2 <| Or.inl hr₀, h⟩,
fun ⟨r, _hr₀, h⟩ => ⟨r, h⟩⟩
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value 1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a multiple of the other. One form of equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff (x y : E) :
‖⟪x, y⟫ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)‖ = 1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : 𝕜, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x := by
constructor
· intro h
have hx₀ : x ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
have hy₀ : y ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
refine ⟨hx₀, (norm_inner_eq_norm_iff hx₀ hy₀).1 <| eq_of_div_eq_one ?_⟩
simpa using h
· rintro ⟨hx, ⟨r, ⟨hr, rfl⟩⟩⟩
simp only [norm_div, norm_mul, norm_ofReal, abs_norm]
exact norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_ne_zero_mul hx hr
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has absolute value 1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a multiple of the other. One form of equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff (x y : F) :
|⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)| = 1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, r ≠ 0 ∧ y = r • x :=
@norm_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff ℝ F _ _ _ x y
theorem inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_div {x y : E} (h₀ : x ≠ 0) :
⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) * ‖y‖ ↔ (‖y‖ / ‖x‖ : 𝕜) • x = y := by
have h₀' := h₀
rw [← norm_ne_zero_iff, Ne, ← @ofReal_eq_zero 𝕜] at h₀'
constructor <;> intro h
· have : x = 0 ∨ y = (⟪x, y⟫ / ⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜) • x :=
((@norm_inner_eq_norm_tfae 𝕜 _ _ _ _ x y).out 0 1).1 (by simp [h])
rw [this.resolve_left h₀, h]
simp [norm_smul, inner_self_ofReal_norm, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ h₀']
· conv_lhs => rw [← h, inner_smul_right, inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K]
field_simp [sq, mul_left_comm]
/-- If the inner product of two vectors is equal to the product of their norms (i.e.,
`⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`), then the two vectors are nonnegative real multiples of each other. One form
of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz.
Compare `norm_inner_eq_norm_iff`, which takes the weaker hypothesis `abs ⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`. -/
theorem inner_eq_norm_mul_iff {x y : E} :
⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) * ‖y‖ ↔ (‖y‖ : 𝕜) • x = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) • y := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | h₀)
· simp
· rw [inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_div h₀, div_eq_inv_mul, mul_smul, inv_smul_eq_iff₀]
rwa [Ne, ofReal_eq_zero, norm_eq_zero]
/-- If the inner product of two vectors is equal to the product of their norms (i.e.,
`⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`), then the two vectors are nonnegative real multiples of each other. One form
of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz.
Compare `norm_inner_eq_norm_iff`, which takes the weaker hypothesis `abs ⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖`. -/
theorem inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_real {x y : F} : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ‖y‖ • x = ‖x‖ • y :=
inner_eq_norm_mul_iff
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has value 1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a positive multiple of the other. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) = 1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, 0 < r ∧ y = r • x := by
constructor
· intro h
have hx₀ : x ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
have hy₀ : y ≠ 0 := fun h₀ => by simp [h₀] at h
refine ⟨hx₀, ‖y‖ / ‖x‖, div_pos (norm_pos_iff.2 hy₀) (norm_pos_iff.2 hx₀), ?_⟩
exact ((inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_div hx₀).1 (eq_of_div_eq_one h)).symm
· rintro ⟨hx, ⟨r, ⟨hr, rfl⟩⟩⟩
exact real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_of_ne_zero_of_pos_mul hx hr
/-- The inner product of two vectors, divided by the product of their
norms, has value -1 if and only if they are nonzero and one is
a negative multiple of the other. -/
theorem real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_iff (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) = -1 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, r < 0 ∧ y = r • x := by
rw [← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, ← neg_div, ← inner_neg_right, ← norm_neg y,
real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff, (@neg_surjective ℝ _).exists]
refine Iff.rfl.and (exists_congr fun r => ?_)
rw [neg_pos, neg_smul, neg_inj]
/-- If the inner product of two unit vectors is `1`, then the two vectors are equal. One form of
the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem inner_eq_one_iff_of_norm_one {x y : E} (hx : ‖x‖ = 1) (hy : ‖y‖ = 1) :
⟪x, y⟫ = 1 ↔ x = y := by
convert inner_eq_norm_mul_iff (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E) using 2 <;> simp [hx, hy]
theorem inner_lt_norm_mul_iff_real {x y : F} : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ < ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ‖y‖ • x ≠ ‖x‖ • y :=
calc
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ < ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≠ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
⟨ne_of_lt, lt_of_le_of_ne (real_inner_le_norm _ _)⟩
_ ↔ ‖y‖ • x ≠ ‖x‖ • y := not_congr inner_eq_norm_mul_iff_real
/-- If the inner product of two unit vectors is strictly less than `1`, then the two vectors are
distinct. One form of the equality case for Cauchy-Schwarz. -/
theorem inner_lt_one_iff_real_of_norm_one {x y : F} (hx : ‖x‖ = 1) (hy : ‖y‖ = 1) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ < 1 ↔ x ≠ y := by convert inner_lt_norm_mul_iff_real (F := F) <;> simp [hx, hy]
/-- The sphere of radius `r = ‖y‖` is tangent to the plane `⟪x, y⟫ = ‖y‖ ^ 2` at `x = y`. -/
theorem eq_of_norm_le_re_inner_eq_norm_sq {x y : E} (hle : ‖x‖ ≤ ‖y‖) (h : re ⟪x, y⟫ = ‖y‖ ^ 2) :
x = y := by
suffices H : re ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ ≤ 0 by rwa [re_inner_self_nonpos, sub_eq_zero] at H
have H₁ : ‖x‖ ^ 2 ≤ ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by gcongr
have H₂ : re ⟪y, x⟫ = ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by rwa [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
simpa [inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right, ← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, h, H₂] using H₁
end Norm
section RCLike
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-- A field `𝕜` satisfying `RCLike` is itself a `𝕜`-inner product space. -/
instance RCLike.innerProductSpace : InnerProductSpace 𝕜 𝕜 where
inner x y := y * conj x
norm_sq_eq_re_inner x := by simp only [inner, mul_conj, ← ofReal_pow, ofReal_re]
conj_inner_symm x y := by simp only [mul_comm, map_mul, starRingEnd_self_apply]
add_left x y z := by simp only [mul_add, map_add]
smul_left x y z := by simp only [mul_comm (conj z), mul_assoc, smul_eq_mul, map_mul]
@[simp]
theorem RCLike.inner_apply (x y : 𝕜) : ⟪x, y⟫ = y * conj x :=
rfl
/-- A version of `RCLike.inner_apply` that swaps the order of multiplication. -/
theorem RCLike.inner_apply' (x y : 𝕜) : ⟪x, y⟫ = conj x * y := mul_comm _ _
end RCLike
section RCLikeToReal
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable {G : Type*}
variable (𝕜 E)
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-- A general inner product implies a real inner product. This is not registered as an instance
since `𝕜` does not appear in the return type `Inner ℝ E`. -/
def Inner.rclikeToReal : Inner ℝ E where inner x y := re ⟪x, y⟫
/-- A general inner product space structure implies a real inner product structure.
This is not registered as an instance since
* `𝕜` does not appear in the return type `InnerProductSpace ℝ E`,
* It is likely to create instance diamonds, as it builds upon the diamond-prone
`NormedSpace.restrictScalars`.
However, it can be used in a proof to obtain a real inner product space structure from a given
`𝕜`-inner product space structure. -/
-- See note [reducible non instances]
abbrev InnerProductSpace.rclikeToReal : InnerProductSpace ℝ E :=
{ Inner.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E,
NormedSpace.restrictScalars ℝ 𝕜
E with
norm_sq_eq_re_inner := norm_sq_eq_re_inner
conj_inner_symm := fun _ _ => inner_re_symm _ _
add_left := fun x y z => by
change re ⟪x + y, z⟫ = re ⟪x, z⟫ + re ⟪y, z⟫
simp only [inner_add_left, map_add]
smul_left := fun x y r => by
change re ⟪(r : 𝕜) • x, y⟫ = r * re ⟪x, y⟫
simp only [inner_smul_left, conj_ofReal, re_ofReal_mul] }
variable {E}
theorem real_inner_eq_re_inner (x y : E) :
@Inner.inner ℝ E (Inner.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E) x y = re ⟪x, y⟫ :=
rfl
theorem real_inner_I_smul_self (x : E) :
@Inner.inner ℝ E (Inner.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E) x ((I : 𝕜) • x) = 0 := by
simp [real_inner_eq_re_inner 𝕜, inner_smul_right]
/-- A complex inner product implies a real inner product. This cannot be an instance since it
creates a diamond with `PiLp.innerProductSpace` because `re (sum i, inner (x i) (y i))` and
`sum i, re (inner (x i) (y i))` are not defeq. -/
def InnerProductSpace.complexToReal [SeminormedAddCommGroup G] [InnerProductSpace ℂ G] :
InnerProductSpace ℝ G :=
InnerProductSpace.rclikeToReal ℂ G
instance : InnerProductSpace ℝ ℂ := InnerProductSpace.complexToReal
@[simp]
protected theorem Complex.inner (w z : ℂ) : ⟪w, z⟫_ℝ = (z * conj w).re :=
rfl
end RCLikeToReal
/-- An `RCLike` field is a real inner product space. -/
noncomputable instance RCLike.toInnerProductSpaceReal : InnerProductSpace ℝ 𝕜 where
__ := Inner.rclikeToReal 𝕜 𝕜
norm_sq_eq_re_inner := norm_sq_eq_re_inner
conj_inner_symm x y := inner_re_symm ..
add_left x y z :=
show re (_ * _) = re (_ * _) + re (_ * _) by simp only [map_add, mul_re, conj_re, conj_im]; ring
smul_left x y r :=
show re (_ * _) = _ * re (_ * _) by
simp only [mul_re, conj_re, conj_im, conj_trivial, smul_re, smul_im]; ring
-- The instance above does not create diamonds for concrete `𝕜`:
example : (innerProductSpace : InnerProductSpace ℝ ℝ) = RCLike.toInnerProductSpaceReal := rfl
example :
(instInnerProductSpaceRealComplex : InnerProductSpace ℝ ℂ) = RCLike.toInnerProductSpaceReal := rfl
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Basic.lean | 2,015 | 2,019 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Support
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Basic
/-!
# Trailing degree of univariate polynomials
## Main definitions
* `trailingDegree p`: the multiplicity of `X` in the polynomial `p`
* `natTrailingDegree`: a variant of `trailingDegree` that takes values in the natural numbers
* `trailingCoeff`: the coefficient at index `natTrailingDegree p`
Converts most results about `degree`, `natDegree` and `leadingCoeff` to results about the bottom
end of a polynomial
-/
noncomputable section
open Function Polynomial Finsupp Finset
open scoped Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {a b : R} {n m : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
/-- `trailingDegree p` is the multiplicity of `x` in the polynomial `p`, i.e. the smallest
`X`-exponent in `p`.
`trailingDegree p = some n` when `p ≠ 0` and `n` is the smallest power of `X` that appears
in `p`, otherwise
`trailingDegree 0 = ⊤`. -/
def trailingDegree (p : R[X]) : ℕ∞ :=
p.support.min
theorem trailingDegree_lt_wf : WellFounded fun p q : R[X] => trailingDegree p < trailingDegree q :=
InvImage.wf trailingDegree wellFounded_lt
/-- `natTrailingDegree p` forces `trailingDegree p` to `ℕ`, by defining
`natTrailingDegree ⊤ = 0`. -/
def natTrailingDegree (p : R[X]) : ℕ :=
ENat.toNat (trailingDegree p)
/-- `trailingCoeff p` gives the coefficient of the smallest power of `X` in `p`. -/
def trailingCoeff (p : R[X]) : R :=
coeff p (natTrailingDegree p)
/-- a polynomial is `monic_at` if its trailing coefficient is 1 -/
def TrailingMonic (p : R[X]) :=
trailingCoeff p = (1 : R)
theorem TrailingMonic.def : TrailingMonic p ↔ trailingCoeff p = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
instance TrailingMonic.decidable [DecidableEq R] : Decidable (TrailingMonic p) :=
inferInstanceAs <| Decidable (trailingCoeff p = (1 : R))
@[simp]
theorem TrailingMonic.trailingCoeff {p : R[X]} (hp : p.TrailingMonic) : trailingCoeff p = 1 :=
hp
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_zero : trailingDegree (0 : R[X]) = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem trailingCoeff_zero : trailingCoeff (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_zero : natTrailingDegree (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_eq_top : trailingDegree p = ⊤ ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨fun h => support_eq_empty.1 (Finset.min_eq_top.1 h), fun h => by simp [h]⟩
theorem trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree (hp : p ≠ 0) :
trailingDegree p = (natTrailingDegree p : ℕ∞) :=
.symm <| ENat.coe_toNat <| mt trailingDegree_eq_top.1 hp
theorem trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
p.trailingDegree = n ↔ p.natTrailingDegree = n := by
rw [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp, Nat.cast_inj]
theorem trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq_of_pos {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
p.trailingDegree = n ↔ p.natTrailingDegree = n := by
rw [natTrailingDegree, ENat.toNat_eq_iff hn]
theorem natTrailingDegree_eq_of_trailingDegree_eq_some {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ}
(h : trailingDegree p = n) : natTrailingDegree p = n := by
simp [natTrailingDegree, h]
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_trailingDegree : ↑(natTrailingDegree p) ≤ trailingDegree p :=
ENat.coe_toNat_le_self _
theorem natTrailingDegree_eq_of_trailingDegree_eq [Semiring S] {q : S[X]}
(h : trailingDegree p = trailingDegree q) : natTrailingDegree p = natTrailingDegree q := by
unfold natTrailingDegree
rw [h]
theorem trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero (h : coeff p n ≠ 0) : trailingDegree p ≤ n :=
min_le (mem_support_iff.2 h)
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero (h : coeff p n ≠ 0) : natTrailingDegree p ≤ n :=
ENat.toNat_le_of_le_coe <| trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero h
@[simp] lemma coeff_natTrailingDegree_eq_zero : coeff p p.natTrailingDegree = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by
constructor
· rintro h
by_contra hp
obtain ⟨n, hpn, hn⟩ := by simpa using min_mem_image_coe <| support_nonempty.2 hp
obtain rfl := (trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq hp).1 hn.symm
exact hpn h
· rintro rfl
simp
lemma coeff_natTrailingDegree_ne_zero : coeff p p.natTrailingDegree ≠ 0 ↔ p ≠ 0 :=
coeff_natTrailingDegree_eq_zero.not
@[simp]
lemma trailingDegree_eq_zero : trailingDegree p = 0 ↔ coeff p 0 ≠ 0 :=
Finset.min_eq_bot.trans mem_support_iff
@[simp] lemma natTrailingDegree_eq_zero : natTrailingDegree p = 0 ↔ p = 0 ∨ coeff p 0 ≠ 0 := by
simp [natTrailingDegree, or_comm]
lemma natTrailingDegree_ne_zero : natTrailingDegree p ≠ 0 ↔ p ≠ 0 ∧ coeff p 0 = 0 :=
natTrailingDegree_eq_zero.not.trans <| by rw [not_or, not_ne_iff]
lemma trailingDegree_ne_zero : trailingDegree p ≠ 0 ↔ coeff p 0 = 0 :=
trailingDegree_eq_zero.not_left
@[simp] theorem trailingDegree_le_trailingDegree (h : coeff q (natTrailingDegree p) ≠ 0) :
trailingDegree q ≤ trailingDegree p :=
(trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero h).trans natTrailingDegree_le_trailingDegree
theorem trailingDegree_ne_of_natTrailingDegree_ne {n : ℕ} :
p.natTrailingDegree ≠ n → trailingDegree p ≠ n :=
mt fun h => by rw [natTrailingDegree, h, ENat.toNat_coe]
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_of_trailingDegree_le {n : ℕ} {hp : p ≠ 0}
(H : (n : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree p) : n ≤ natTrailingDegree p := by
rwa [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp, Nat.cast_le] at H
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_natTrailingDegree (hq : q ≠ 0)
(hpq : p.trailingDegree ≤ q.trailingDegree) : p.natTrailingDegree ≤ q.natTrailingDegree :=
ENat.toNat_le_toNat hpq <| by simpa
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_monomial (ha : a ≠ 0) : trailingDegree (monomial n a) = n := by
rw [trailingDegree, support_monomial n ha, min_singleton]
rfl
theorem natTrailingDegree_monomial (ha : a ≠ 0) : natTrailingDegree (monomial n a) = n := by
rw [natTrailingDegree, trailingDegree_monomial ha]
rfl
theorem natTrailingDegree_monomial_le : natTrailingDegree (monomial n a) ≤ n :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if ha : a = 0 then by simp [ha] else (natTrailingDegree_monomial ha).le
theorem le_trailingDegree_monomial : ↑n ≤ trailingDegree (monomial n a) :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if ha : a = 0 then by simp [ha] else (trailingDegree_monomial ha).ge
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_C (ha : a ≠ 0) : trailingDegree (C a) = (0 : ℕ∞) :=
trailingDegree_monomial ha
theorem le_trailingDegree_C : (0 : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree (C a) :=
le_trailingDegree_monomial
theorem trailingDegree_one_le : (0 : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree (1 : R[X]) := by
rw [← C_1]
exact le_trailingDegree_C
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_C (a : R) : natTrailingDegree (C a) = 0 :=
nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 natTrailingDegree_monomial_le
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_one : natTrailingDegree (1 : R[X]) = 0 :=
natTrailingDegree_C 1
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_natCast (n : ℕ) : natTrailingDegree (n : R[X]) = 0 := by
simp only [← C_eq_natCast, natTrailingDegree_C]
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) : trailingDegree (C a * X ^ n) = n := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, trailingDegree_monomial ha]
theorem le_trailingDegree_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (a : R) :
(n : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree (C a * X ^ n) := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]
exact le_trailingDegree_monomial
theorem coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_trailingDegree (h : (n : ℕ∞) < trailingDegree p) : coeff p n = 0 :=
Classical.not_not.1 (mt trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero (not_le_of_gt h))
theorem coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_natTrailingDegree {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (h : n < p.natTrailingDegree) :
p.coeff n = 0 := by
apply coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_trailingDegree
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [hp, trailingDegree_zero]
exact WithTop.coe_lt_top n
· rw [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp]
exact WithTop.coe_lt_coe.2 h
@[simp]
theorem coeff_natTrailingDegree_pred_eq_zero {p : R[X]} {hp : (0 : ℕ∞) < natTrailingDegree p} :
p.coeff (p.natTrailingDegree - 1) = 0 :=
coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_natTrailingDegree <|
Nat.sub_lt (WithTop.coe_pos.mp hp) Nat.one_pos
theorem le_trailingDegree_X_pow (n : ℕ) : (n : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree (X ^ n : R[X]) := by
simpa only [C_1, one_mul] using le_trailingDegree_C_mul_X_pow n (1 : R)
theorem le_trailingDegree_X : (1 : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree (X : R[X]) :=
le_trailingDegree_monomial
theorem natTrailingDegree_X_le : (X : R[X]).natTrailingDegree ≤ 1 :=
natTrailingDegree_monomial_le
@[simp]
theorem trailingCoeff_eq_zero : trailingCoeff p = 0 ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨fun h =>
_root_.by_contradiction fun hp =>
mt mem_support_iff.1 (Classical.not_not.2 h)
(mem_of_min (trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp)),
fun h => h.symm ▸ leadingCoeff_zero⟩
theorem trailingCoeff_nonzero_iff_nonzero : trailingCoeff p ≠ 0 ↔ p ≠ 0 :=
not_congr trailingCoeff_eq_zero
theorem natTrailingDegree_mem_support_of_nonzero : p ≠ 0 → natTrailingDegree p ∈ p.support :=
mem_support_iff.mpr ∘ trailingCoeff_nonzero_iff_nonzero.mpr
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_of_mem_supp (a : ℕ) : a ∈ p.support → natTrailingDegree p ≤ a :=
natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero ∘ mem_support_iff.mp
theorem natTrailingDegree_eq_support_min' (h : p ≠ 0) :
natTrailingDegree p = p.support.min' (nonempty_support_iff.mpr h) := by
rw [natTrailingDegree, trailingDegree, ← Finset.coe_min', ENat.some_eq_coe, ENat.toNat_coe]
theorem le_natTrailingDegree (hp : p ≠ 0) (hn : ∀ m < n, p.coeff m = 0) :
n ≤ p.natTrailingDegree := by
rw [natTrailingDegree_eq_support_min' hp]
exact Finset.le_min' _ _ _ fun m hm => not_lt.1 fun hmn => mem_support_iff.1 hm <| hn _ hmn
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_natDegree (p : R[X]) : p.natTrailingDegree ≤ p.natDegree := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [hp, natDegree_zero, natTrailingDegree_zero]
· exact le_natDegree_of_ne_zero (mt trailingCoeff_eq_zero.mp hp)
theorem natTrailingDegree_mul_X_pow {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) :
(p * X ^ n).natTrailingDegree = p.natTrailingDegree + n := by
apply le_antisymm
· refine natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero fun h => mt trailingCoeff_eq_zero.mp hp ?_
rwa [trailingCoeff, ← coeff_mul_X_pow]
· rw [natTrailingDegree_eq_support_min' fun h => hp (mul_X_pow_eq_zero h), Finset.le_min'_iff]
intro y hy
have key : n ≤ y := by
rw [mem_support_iff, coeff_mul_X_pow'] at hy
exact by_contra fun h => hy (if_neg h)
rw [mem_support_iff, coeff_mul_X_pow', if_pos key] at hy
exact (le_tsub_iff_right key).mp (natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero hy)
theorem le_trailingDegree_mul : p.trailingDegree + q.trailingDegree ≤ (p * q).trailingDegree := by
refine Finset.le_min fun n hn => ?_
rw [mem_support_iff, coeff_mul] at hn
obtain ⟨⟨i, j⟩, hij, hpq⟩ := exists_ne_zero_of_sum_ne_zero hn
refine
(add_le_add (min_le (mem_support_iff.mpr (left_ne_zero_of_mul hpq)))
(min_le (mem_support_iff.mpr (right_ne_zero_of_mul hpq)))).trans_eq ?_
rwa [← WithTop.coe_add, WithTop.coe_eq_coe, ← mem_antidiagonal]
theorem le_natTrailingDegree_mul (h : p * q ≠ 0) :
p.natTrailingDegree + q.natTrailingDegree ≤ (p * q).natTrailingDegree := by
have hp : p ≠ 0 := fun hp => h (by rw [hp, zero_mul])
have hq : q ≠ 0 := fun hq => h (by rw [hq, mul_zero])
rw [← WithTop.coe_le_coe, WithTop.coe_add, ← Nat.cast_withTop (natTrailingDegree p),
← Nat.cast_withTop (natTrailingDegree q), ← Nat.cast_withTop (natTrailingDegree (p * q)),
← trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp, ← trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hq,
← trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree h]
exact le_trailingDegree_mul
theorem coeff_mul_natTrailingDegree_add_natTrailingDegree : (p * q).coeff
(p.natTrailingDegree + q.natTrailingDegree) = p.trailingCoeff * q.trailingCoeff := by
rw [coeff_mul]
refine
Finset.sum_eq_single (p.natTrailingDegree, q.natTrailingDegree) ?_ fun h =>
(h (mem_antidiagonal.mpr rfl)).elim
rintro ⟨i, j⟩ h₁ h₂
rw [mem_antidiagonal] at h₁
by_cases hi : i < p.natTrailingDegree
· rw [coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_natTrailingDegree hi, zero_mul]
by_cases hj : j < q.natTrailingDegree
· rw [coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_natTrailingDegree hj, mul_zero]
rw [not_lt] at hi hj
refine (h₂ (Prod.ext_iff.mpr ?_).symm).elim
exact (add_eq_add_iff_eq_and_eq hi hj).mp h₁.symm
theorem trailingDegree_mul' (h : p.trailingCoeff * q.trailingCoeff ≠ 0) :
(p * q).trailingDegree = p.trailingDegree + q.trailingDegree := by
have hp : p ≠ 0 := fun hp => h (by rw [hp, trailingCoeff_zero, zero_mul])
have hq : q ≠ 0 := fun hq => h (by rw [hq, trailingCoeff_zero, mul_zero])
refine le_antisymm ?_ le_trailingDegree_mul
rw [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp, trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hq, ←
ENat.coe_add]
apply trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero
rwa [coeff_mul_natTrailingDegree_add_natTrailingDegree]
theorem natTrailingDegree_mul' (h : p.trailingCoeff * q.trailingCoeff ≠ 0) :
(p * q).natTrailingDegree = p.natTrailingDegree + q.natTrailingDegree := by
have hp : p ≠ 0 := fun hp => h (by rw [hp, trailingCoeff_zero, zero_mul])
have hq : q ≠ 0 := fun hq => h (by rw [hq, trailingCoeff_zero, mul_zero])
apply natTrailingDegree_eq_of_trailingDegree_eq_some
rw [trailingDegree_mul' h, Nat.cast_withTop (natTrailingDegree p + natTrailingDegree q),
WithTop.coe_add, ← Nat.cast_withTop, ← Nat.cast_withTop,
← trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp, ← trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hq]
theorem natTrailingDegree_mul [NoZeroDivisors R] (hp : p ≠ 0) (hq : q ≠ 0) :
(p * q).natTrailingDegree = p.natTrailingDegree + q.natTrailingDegree :=
natTrailingDegree_mul'
(mul_ne_zero (mt trailingCoeff_eq_zero.mp hp) (mt trailingCoeff_eq_zero.mp hq))
end Semiring
section NonzeroSemiring
variable [Semiring R] [Nontrivial R] {p q : R[X]}
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_one : trailingDegree (1 : R[X]) = (0 : ℕ∞) :=
trailingDegree_C one_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_X : trailingDegree (X : R[X]) = 1 :=
trailingDegree_monomial one_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_X : (X : R[X]).natTrailingDegree = 1 :=
natTrailingDegree_monomial one_ne_zero
@[simp]
lemma trailingDegree_X_pow (n : ℕ) :
(X ^ n : R[X]).trailingDegree = n := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, trailingDegree_monomial one_ne_zero]
@[simp]
lemma natTrailingDegree_X_pow (n : ℕ) :
(X ^ n : R[X]).natTrailingDegree = n := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, natTrailingDegree_monomial one_ne_zero]
end NonzeroSemiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R]
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_neg (p : R[X]) : trailingDegree (-p) = trailingDegree p := by
unfold trailingDegree
rw [support_neg]
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_neg (p : R[X]) : natTrailingDegree (-p) = natTrailingDegree p := by
simp [natTrailingDegree]
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_intCast (n : ℤ) : natTrailingDegree (n : R[X]) = 0 := by
simp only [← C_eq_intCast, natTrailingDegree_C]
end Ring
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
/-- The second-lowest coefficient, or 0 for constants -/
def nextCoeffUp (p : R[X]) : R :=
if p.natTrailingDegree = 0 then 0 else p.coeff (p.natTrailingDegree + 1)
@[simp] lemma nextCoeffUp_zero : nextCoeffUp (0 : R[X]) = 0 := by simp [nextCoeffUp]
@[simp]
theorem nextCoeffUp_C_eq_zero (c : R) : nextCoeffUp (C c) = 0 := by
rw [nextCoeffUp]
simp
theorem nextCoeffUp_of_constantCoeff_eq_zero (p : R[X]) (hp : coeff p 0 = 0) :
nextCoeffUp p = p.coeff (p.natTrailingDegree + 1) := by
obtain rfl | hp₀ := eq_or_ne p 0
· simp
· rw [nextCoeffUp, if_neg (natTrailingDegree_ne_zero.2 ⟨hp₀, hp⟩)]
end Semiring
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem coeff_natTrailingDegree_eq_zero_of_trailingDegree_lt
(h : trailingDegree p < trailingDegree q) : coeff q (natTrailingDegree p) = 0 :=
coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_trailingDegree <| natTrailingDegree_le_trailingDegree.trans_lt h
theorem ne_zero_of_trailingDegree_lt {n : ℕ∞} (h : trailingDegree p < n) : p ≠ 0 := fun h₀ =>
h.not_le (by simp [h₀])
lemma natTrailingDegree_eq_zero_of_constantCoeff_ne_zero (h : constantCoeff p ≠ 0) :
p.natTrailingDegree = 0 :=
le_antisymm (natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero h) zero_le'
namespace Monic
lemma eq_X_pow_iff_natDegree_le_natTrailingDegree (h₁ : p.Monic) :
p = X ^ p.natDegree ↔ p.natDegree ≤ p.natTrailingDegree := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· nontriviality R
rw [h, natTrailingDegree_X_pow, ← h]
· ext n
rw [coeff_X_pow]
obtain hn | rfl | hn := lt_trichotomy n p.natDegree
· rw [if_neg hn.ne, coeff_eq_zero_of_lt_natTrailingDegree (hn.trans_le h)]
· simpa only [if_pos rfl] using h₁.leadingCoeff
· rw [if_neg hn.ne', coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt hn]
lemma eq_X_pow_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq_natDegree (h₁ : p.Monic) :
p = X ^ p.natDegree ↔ p.natTrailingDegree = p.natDegree :=
h₁.eq_X_pow_iff_natDegree_le_natTrailingDegree.trans (natTrailingDegree_le_natDegree p).ge_iff_eq
| end Monic
end Semiring
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Degree/TrailingDegree.lean | 446 | 449 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot, Casper Putz, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Tower
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Sum
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Block
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Notation
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.Fin
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.Prod
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.SMul
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.StdBasis
import Mathlib.RingTheory.AlgebraTower
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Span
/-!
# Linear maps and matrices
This file defines the maps to send matrices to a linear map,
and to send linear maps between modules with a finite bases
to matrices. This defines a linear equivalence between linear maps
between finite-dimensional vector spaces and matrices indexed by
the respective bases.
## Main definitions
In the list below, and in all this file, `R` is a commutative ring (semiring
is sometimes enough), `M` and its variations are `R`-modules, `ι`, `κ`, `n` and `m` are finite
types used for indexing.
* `LinearMap.toMatrix`: given bases `v₁ : ι → M₁` and `v₂ : κ → M₂`,
the `R`-linear equivalence from `M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂` to `Matrix κ ι R`
* `Matrix.toLin`: the inverse of `LinearMap.toMatrix`
* `LinearMap.toMatrix'`: the `R`-linear equivalence from `(m → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)`
to `Matrix m n R` (with the standard basis on `m → R` and `n → R`)
* `Matrix.toLin'`: the inverse of `LinearMap.toMatrix'`
* `algEquivMatrix`: given a basis indexed by `n`, the `R`-algebra equivalence between
`R`-endomorphisms of `M` and `Matrix n n R`
## Issues
This file was originally written without attention to non-commutative rings,
and so mostly only works in the commutative setting. This should be fixed.
In particular, `Matrix.mulVec` gives us a linear equivalence
`Matrix m n R ≃ₗ[R] (n → R) →ₗ[Rᵐᵒᵖ] (m → R)`
while `Matrix.vecMul` gives us a linear equivalence
`Matrix m n R ≃ₗ[Rᵐᵒᵖ] (m → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)`.
At present, the first equivalence is developed in detail but only for commutative rings
(and we omit the distinction between `Rᵐᵒᵖ` and `R`),
while the second equivalence is developed only in brief, but for not-necessarily-commutative rings.
Naming is slightly inconsistent between the two developments.
In the original (commutative) development `linear` is abbreviated to `lin`,
although this is not consistent with the rest of mathlib.
In the new (non-commutative) development `linear` is not abbreviated, and declarations use `_right`
to indicate they use the right action of matrices on vectors (via `Matrix.vecMul`).
When the two developments are made uniform, the names should be made uniform, too,
by choosing between `linear` and `lin` consistently,
and (presumably) adding `_left` where necessary.
## Tags
linear_map, matrix, linear_equiv, diagonal, det, trace
-/
noncomputable section
open LinearMap Matrix Set Submodule
section ToMatrixRight
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R]
variable {l m n : Type*}
/-- `Matrix.vecMul M` is a linear map. -/
def Matrix.vecMulLinear [Fintype m] (M : Matrix m n R) : (m → R) →ₗ[R] n → R where
toFun x := x ᵥ* M
map_add' _ _ := funext fun _ ↦ add_dotProduct _ _ _
map_smul' _ _ := funext fun _ ↦ smul_dotProduct _ _ _
@[simp] theorem Matrix.vecMulLinear_apply [Fintype m] (M : Matrix m n R) (x : m → R) :
M.vecMulLinear x = x ᵥ* M := rfl
theorem Matrix.coe_vecMulLinear [Fintype m] (M : Matrix m n R) :
(M.vecMulLinear : _ → _) = M.vecMul := rfl
variable [Fintype m]
theorem range_vecMulLinear (M : Matrix m n R) :
LinearMap.range M.vecMulLinear = span R (range M.row) := by
letI := Classical.decEq m
simp_rw [range_eq_map, ← iSup_range_single, Submodule.map_iSup, range_eq_map, ←
Ideal.span_singleton_one, Ideal.span, Submodule.map_span, image_image, image_singleton,
Matrix.vecMulLinear_apply, iSup_span, range_eq_iUnion, iUnion_singleton_eq_range,
LinearMap.single, LinearMap.coe_mk, AddHom.coe_mk, row_def]
unfold vecMul
simp_rw [single_dotProduct, one_mul]
theorem Matrix.vecMul_injective_iff {R : Type*} [Ring R] {M : Matrix m n R} :
Function.Injective M.vecMul ↔ LinearIndependent R M.row := by
rw [← coe_vecMulLinear]
simp only [← LinearMap.ker_eq_bot, Fintype.linearIndependent_iff, Submodule.eq_bot_iff,
LinearMap.mem_ker, vecMulLinear_apply, row_def]
refine ⟨fun h c h0 ↦ congr_fun <| h c ?_, fun h c h0 ↦ funext <| h c ?_⟩
· rw [← h0]
ext i
simp [vecMul, dotProduct]
· rw [← h0]
ext j
simp [vecMul, dotProduct]
lemma Matrix.linearIndependent_rows_of_isUnit {R : Type*} [Ring R] {A : Matrix m m R}
[DecidableEq m] (ha : IsUnit A) : LinearIndependent R A.row := by
rw [← Matrix.vecMul_injective_iff]
exact Matrix.vecMul_injective_of_isUnit ha
section
variable [DecidableEq m]
/-- Linear maps `(m → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)` are linearly equivalent over `Rᵐᵒᵖ` to `Matrix m n R`,
by having matrices act by right multiplication.
-/
def LinearMap.toMatrixRight' : ((m → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) ≃ₗ[Rᵐᵒᵖ] Matrix m n R where
toFun f i j := f (single R (fun _ ↦ R) i 1) j
invFun := Matrix.vecMulLinear
right_inv M := by
ext i j
simp
left_inv f := by
apply (Pi.basisFun R m).ext
intro j; ext i
simp
map_add' f g := by
ext i j
simp only [Pi.add_apply, LinearMap.add_apply, Matrix.add_apply]
map_smul' c f := by
ext i j
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply, RingHom.id_apply, Matrix.smul_apply]
/-- A `Matrix m n R` is linearly equivalent over `Rᵐᵒᵖ` to a linear map `(m → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)`,
by having matrices act by right multiplication. -/
abbrev Matrix.toLinearMapRight' [DecidableEq m] : Matrix m n R ≃ₗ[Rᵐᵒᵖ] (m → R) →ₗ[R] n → R :=
LinearEquiv.symm LinearMap.toMatrixRight'
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMapRight'_apply (M : Matrix m n R) (v : m → R) :
(Matrix.toLinearMapRight') M v = v ᵥ* M := rfl
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMapRight'_mul [Fintype l] [DecidableEq l] (M : Matrix l m R)
(N : Matrix m n R) :
Matrix.toLinearMapRight' (M * N) =
(Matrix.toLinearMapRight' N).comp (Matrix.toLinearMapRight' M) :=
LinearMap.ext fun _x ↦ (vecMul_vecMul _ M N).symm
theorem Matrix.toLinearMapRight'_mul_apply [Fintype l] [DecidableEq l] (M : Matrix l m R)
(N : Matrix m n R) (x) :
Matrix.toLinearMapRight' (M * N) x =
Matrix.toLinearMapRight' N (Matrix.toLinearMapRight' M x) :=
(vecMul_vecMul _ M N).symm
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMapRight'_one :
Matrix.toLinearMapRight' (1 : Matrix m m R) = LinearMap.id := by
ext
simp [Module.End.one_apply]
/-- If `M` and `M'` are each other's inverse matrices, they provide an equivalence between `n → A`
and `m → A` corresponding to `M.vecMul` and `M'.vecMul`. -/
@[simps]
def Matrix.toLinearEquivRight'OfInv [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] {M : Matrix m n R}
{M' : Matrix n m R} (hMM' : M * M' = 1) (hM'M : M' * M = 1) : (n → R) ≃ₗ[R] m → R :=
{ LinearMap.toMatrixRight'.symm M' with
toFun := Matrix.toLinearMapRight' M'
invFun := Matrix.toLinearMapRight' M
left_inv := fun x ↦ by
rw [← Matrix.toLinearMapRight'_mul_apply, hM'M, Matrix.toLinearMapRight'_one, id_apply]
right_inv := fun x ↦ by
rw [← Matrix.toLinearMapRight'_mul_apply, hMM', Matrix.toLinearMapRight'_one, id_apply] }
end
end ToMatrixRight
/-!
From this point on, we only work with commutative rings,
and fail to distinguish between `Rᵐᵒᵖ` and `R`.
This should eventually be remedied.
-/
section mulVec
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
variable {k l m n : Type*}
/-- `Matrix.mulVec M` is a linear map. -/
def Matrix.mulVecLin [Fintype n] (M : Matrix m n R) : (n → R) →ₗ[R] m → R where
toFun := M.mulVec
map_add' _ _ := funext fun _ ↦ dotProduct_add _ _ _
map_smul' _ _ := funext fun _ ↦ dotProduct_smul _ _ _
theorem Matrix.coe_mulVecLin [Fintype n] (M : Matrix m n R) :
(M.mulVecLin : _ → _) = M.mulVec := rfl
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.mulVecLin_apply [Fintype n] (M : Matrix m n R) (v : n → R) :
M.mulVecLin v = M *ᵥ v :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.mulVecLin_zero [Fintype n] : Matrix.mulVecLin (0 : Matrix m n R) = 0 :=
LinearMap.ext zero_mulVec
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.mulVecLin_add [Fintype n] (M N : Matrix m n R) :
(M + N).mulVecLin = M.mulVecLin + N.mulVecLin :=
LinearMap.ext fun _ ↦ add_mulVec _ _ _
@[simp] theorem Matrix.mulVecLin_transpose [Fintype m] (M : Matrix m n R) :
Mᵀ.mulVecLin = M.vecMulLinear := by
ext; simp [mulVec_transpose]
@[simp] theorem Matrix.vecMulLinear_transpose [Fintype n] (M : Matrix m n R) :
Mᵀ.vecMulLinear = M.mulVecLin := by
ext; simp [vecMul_transpose]
theorem Matrix.mulVecLin_submatrix [Fintype n] [Fintype l] (f₁ : m → k) (e₂ : n ≃ l)
(M : Matrix k l R) :
(M.submatrix f₁ e₂).mulVecLin = funLeft R R f₁ ∘ₗ M.mulVecLin ∘ₗ funLeft _ _ e₂.symm :=
LinearMap.ext fun _ ↦ submatrix_mulVec_equiv _ _ _ _
/-- A variant of `Matrix.mulVecLin_submatrix` that keeps around `LinearEquiv`s. -/
theorem Matrix.mulVecLin_reindex [Fintype n] [Fintype l] (e₁ : k ≃ m) (e₂ : l ≃ n)
(M : Matrix k l R) :
(reindex e₁ e₂ M).mulVecLin =
↑(LinearEquiv.funCongrLeft R R e₁.symm) ∘ₗ
M.mulVecLin ∘ₗ ↑(LinearEquiv.funCongrLeft R R e₂) :=
Matrix.mulVecLin_submatrix _ _ _
variable [Fintype n]
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.mulVecLin_one [DecidableEq n] :
Matrix.mulVecLin (1 : Matrix n n R) = LinearMap.id := by
ext; simp [Matrix.one_apply, Pi.single_apply, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.mulVecLin_mul [Fintype m] (M : Matrix l m R) (N : Matrix m n R) :
Matrix.mulVecLin (M * N) = (Matrix.mulVecLin M).comp (Matrix.mulVecLin N) :=
LinearMap.ext fun _ ↦ (mulVec_mulVec _ _ _).symm
theorem Matrix.ker_mulVecLin_eq_bot_iff {M : Matrix m n R} :
(LinearMap.ker M.mulVecLin) = ⊥ ↔ ∀ v, M *ᵥ v = 0 → v = 0 := by
simp only [Submodule.eq_bot_iff, LinearMap.mem_ker, Matrix.mulVecLin_apply]
theorem Matrix.range_mulVecLin (M : Matrix m n R) :
LinearMap.range M.mulVecLin = span R (range M.col) := by
rw [← vecMulLinear_transpose, range_vecMulLinear, row_transpose]
theorem Matrix.mulVec_injective_iff {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {M : Matrix m n R} :
Function.Injective M.mulVec ↔ LinearIndependent R M.col := by
change Function.Injective (fun x ↦ _) ↔ _
simp_rw [← M.vecMul_transpose, vecMul_injective_iff, row_transpose]
lemma Matrix.linearIndependent_cols_of_isUnit {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [Fintype m]
{A : Matrix m m R} [DecidableEq m] (ha : IsUnit A) :
LinearIndependent R A.col := by
rw [← Matrix.mulVec_injective_iff]
exact Matrix.mulVec_injective_of_isUnit ha
end mulVec
section ToMatrix'
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
variable {k l m n : Type*} [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n]
/-- Linear maps `(n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R)` are linearly equivalent to `Matrix m n R`. -/
def LinearMap.toMatrix' : ((n → R) →ₗ[R] m → R) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n R where
toFun f := of fun i j ↦ f (Pi.single j 1) i
invFun := Matrix.mulVecLin
right_inv M := by
ext i j
simp only [Matrix.mulVec_single_one, Matrix.mulVecLin_apply, of_apply, transpose_apply]
left_inv f := by
apply (Pi.basisFun R n).ext
intro j; ext i
simp only [Pi.basisFun_apply, Matrix.mulVec_single_one,
Matrix.mulVecLin_apply, of_apply, transpose_apply]
map_add' f g := by
ext i j
simp only [Pi.add_apply, LinearMap.add_apply, of_apply, Matrix.add_apply]
map_smul' c f := by
ext i j
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply, RingHom.id_apply, of_apply, Matrix.smul_apply]
/-- A `Matrix m n R` is linearly equivalent to a linear map `(n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R)`.
Note that the forward-direction does not require `DecidableEq` and is `Matrix.vecMulLin`. -/
def Matrix.toLin' : Matrix m n R ≃ₗ[R] (n → R) →ₗ[R] m → R :=
LinearMap.toMatrix'.symm
theorem Matrix.toLin'_apply' (M : Matrix m n R) : Matrix.toLin' M = M.mulVecLin :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix'_symm :
(LinearMap.toMatrix'.symm : Matrix m n R ≃ₗ[R] _) = Matrix.toLin' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLin'_symm :
(Matrix.toLin'.symm : ((n → R) →ₗ[R] m → R) ≃ₗ[R] _) = LinearMap.toMatrix' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix'_toLin' (M : Matrix m n R) : LinearMap.toMatrix' (Matrix.toLin' M) = M :=
LinearMap.toMatrix'.apply_symm_apply M
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLin'_toMatrix' (f : (n → R) →ₗ[R] m → R) :
Matrix.toLin' (LinearMap.toMatrix' f) = f :=
Matrix.toLin'.apply_symm_apply f
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix'_apply (f : (n → R) →ₗ[R] m → R) (i j) :
LinearMap.toMatrix' f i j = f (fun j' ↦ if j' = j then 1 else 0) i := by
simp only [LinearMap.toMatrix', LinearEquiv.coe_mk, of_apply]
congr! with i
split_ifs with h
· rw [h, Pi.single_eq_same]
apply Pi.single_eq_of_ne h
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLin'_apply (M : Matrix m n R) (v : n → R) : Matrix.toLin' M v = M *ᵥ v :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLin'_one : Matrix.toLin' (1 : Matrix n n R) = LinearMap.id :=
Matrix.mulVecLin_one
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix'_id : LinearMap.toMatrix' (LinearMap.id : (n → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) = 1 := by
ext
rw [Matrix.one_apply, LinearMap.toMatrix'_apply, id_apply]
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix'_one : LinearMap.toMatrix' (1 : (n → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) = 1 :=
LinearMap.toMatrix'_id
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLin'_mul [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] (M : Matrix l m R) (N : Matrix m n R) :
Matrix.toLin' (M * N) = (Matrix.toLin' M).comp (Matrix.toLin' N) :=
Matrix.mulVecLin_mul _ _
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLin'_submatrix [Fintype l] [DecidableEq l] (f₁ : m → k) (e₂ : n ≃ l)
(M : Matrix k l R) :
Matrix.toLin' (M.submatrix f₁ e₂) =
funLeft R R f₁ ∘ₗ (Matrix.toLin' M) ∘ₗ funLeft _ _ e₂.symm :=
Matrix.mulVecLin_submatrix _ _ _
/-- A variant of `Matrix.toLin'_submatrix` that keeps around `LinearEquiv`s. -/
theorem Matrix.toLin'_reindex [Fintype l] [DecidableEq l] (e₁ : k ≃ m) (e₂ : l ≃ n)
(M : Matrix k l R) :
Matrix.toLin' (reindex e₁ e₂ M) =
↑(LinearEquiv.funCongrLeft R R e₁.symm) ∘ₗ (Matrix.toLin' M) ∘ₗ
↑(LinearEquiv.funCongrLeft R R e₂) :=
Matrix.mulVecLin_reindex _ _ _
/-- Shortcut lemma for `Matrix.toLin'_mul` and `LinearMap.comp_apply` -/
theorem Matrix.toLin'_mul_apply [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] (M : Matrix l m R) (N : Matrix m n R)
(x) : Matrix.toLin' (M * N) x = Matrix.toLin' M (Matrix.toLin' N x) := by
rw [Matrix.toLin'_mul, LinearMap.comp_apply]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix'_comp [Fintype l] [DecidableEq l] (f : (n → R) →ₗ[R] m → R)
(g : (l → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) :
LinearMap.toMatrix' (f.comp g) = LinearMap.toMatrix' f * LinearMap.toMatrix' g := by
suffices f.comp g = Matrix.toLin' (LinearMap.toMatrix' f * LinearMap.toMatrix' g) by
rw [this, LinearMap.toMatrix'_toLin']
rw [Matrix.toLin'_mul, Matrix.toLin'_toMatrix', Matrix.toLin'_toMatrix']
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix'_mul [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] (f g : (m → R) →ₗ[R] m → R) :
LinearMap.toMatrix' (f * g) = LinearMap.toMatrix' f * LinearMap.toMatrix' g :=
LinearMap.toMatrix'_comp f g
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix'_algebraMap (x : R) :
LinearMap.toMatrix' (algebraMap R (Module.End R (n → R)) x) = scalar n x := by
simp [Module.algebraMap_end_eq_smul_id, smul_eq_diagonal_mul]
theorem Matrix.ker_toLin'_eq_bot_iff {M : Matrix n n R} :
LinearMap.ker (Matrix.toLin' M) = ⊥ ↔ ∀ v, M *ᵥ v = 0 → v = 0 :=
Matrix.ker_mulVecLin_eq_bot_iff
theorem Matrix.range_toLin' (M : Matrix m n R) :
LinearMap.range (Matrix.toLin' M) = span R (range M.col) :=
Matrix.range_mulVecLin _
/-- If `M` and `M'` are each other's inverse matrices, they provide an equivalence between `m → A`
and `n → A` corresponding to `M.mulVec` and `M'.mulVec`. -/
@[simps]
def Matrix.toLin'OfInv [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] {M : Matrix m n R} {M' : Matrix n m R}
(hMM' : M * M' = 1) (hM'M : M' * M = 1) : (m → R) ≃ₗ[R] n → R :=
{ Matrix.toLin' M' with
toFun := Matrix.toLin' M'
invFun := Matrix.toLin' M
left_inv := fun x ↦ by rw [← Matrix.toLin'_mul_apply, hMM', Matrix.toLin'_one, id_apply]
right_inv := fun x ↦ by
rw [← Matrix.toLin'_mul_apply, hM'M, Matrix.toLin'_one, id_apply] }
/-- Linear maps `(n → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)` are algebra equivalent to `Matrix n n R`. -/
def LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv' : ((n → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) ≃ₐ[R] Matrix n n R :=
AlgEquiv.ofLinearEquiv LinearMap.toMatrix' LinearMap.toMatrix'_one LinearMap.toMatrix'_mul
/-- A `Matrix n n R` is algebra equivalent to a linear map `(n → R) →ₗ[R] (n → R)`. -/
def Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv' : Matrix n n R ≃ₐ[R] (n → R) →ₗ[R] n → R :=
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv'.symm
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv'_symm :
(LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv'.symm : Matrix n n R ≃ₐ[R] _) = Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv'_symm :
(Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv'.symm : ((n → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) ≃ₐ[R] _) = LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv'_toLinAlgEquiv' (M : Matrix n n R) :
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv' (Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv' M) = M :=
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv'.apply_symm_apply M
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv'_toMatrixAlgEquiv' (f : (n → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) :
Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv' (LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv' f) = f :=
Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv'.apply_symm_apply f
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv'_apply (f : (n → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) (i j) :
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv' f i j = f (fun j' ↦ if j' = j then 1 else 0) i := by
simp [LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv']
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv'_apply (M : Matrix n n R) (v : n → R) :
Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv' M v = M *ᵥ v :=
rfl
theorem Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv'_one : Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv' (1 : Matrix n n R) = LinearMap.id :=
Matrix.toLin'_one
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv'_id :
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv' (LinearMap.id : (n → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) = 1 :=
LinearMap.toMatrix'_id
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv'_comp (f g : (n → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) :
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv' (f.comp g) =
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv' f * LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv' g :=
LinearMap.toMatrix'_comp _ _
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv'_mul (f g : (n → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) :
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv' (f * g) =
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv' f * LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv' g :=
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv'_comp f g
end ToMatrix'
section ToMatrix
section Finite
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
variable {l m n : Type*} [Fintype n] [Finite m] [DecidableEq n]
variable {M₁ M₂ : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M₁] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R M₁] [Module R M₂]
variable (v₁ : Basis n R M₁) (v₂ : Basis m R M₂)
/-- Given bases of two modules `M₁` and `M₂` over a commutative ring `R`, we get a linear
equivalence between linear maps `M₁ →ₗ M₂` and matrices over `R` indexed by the bases. -/
def LinearMap.toMatrix : (M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix m n R :=
LinearEquiv.trans (LinearEquiv.arrowCongr v₁.equivFun v₂.equivFun) LinearMap.toMatrix'
/-- `LinearMap.toMatrix'` is a particular case of `LinearMap.toMatrix`, for the standard basis
`Pi.basisFun R n`. -/
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_eq_toMatrix' :
LinearMap.toMatrix (Pi.basisFun R n) (Pi.basisFun R n) = LinearMap.toMatrix' :=
rfl
/-- Given bases of two modules `M₁` and `M₂` over a commutative ring `R`, we get a linear
equivalence between matrices over `R` indexed by the bases and linear maps `M₁ →ₗ M₂`. -/
def Matrix.toLin : Matrix m n R ≃ₗ[R] M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂ :=
(LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂).symm
/-- `Matrix.toLin'` is a particular case of `Matrix.toLin`, for the standard basis
`Pi.basisFun R n`. -/
theorem Matrix.toLin_eq_toLin' : Matrix.toLin (Pi.basisFun R n) (Pi.basisFun R m) = Matrix.toLin' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_symm : (LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂).symm = Matrix.toLin v₁ v₂ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLin_symm : (Matrix.toLin v₁ v₂).symm = LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLin_toMatrix (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) :
Matrix.toLin v₁ v₂ (LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂ f) = f := by
rw [← Matrix.toLin_symm, LinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply]
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_toLin (M : Matrix m n R) :
LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂ (Matrix.toLin v₁ v₂ M) = M := by
rw [← Matrix.toLin_symm, LinearEquiv.symm_apply_apply]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_apply (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) (i : m) (j : n) :
LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂ f i j = v₂.repr (f (v₁ j)) i := by
rw [LinearMap.toMatrix, LinearEquiv.trans_apply, LinearMap.toMatrix'_apply,
LinearEquiv.arrowCongr_apply, Basis.equivFun_symm_apply, Finset.sum_eq_single j, if_pos rfl,
one_smul, Basis.equivFun_apply]
· intro j' _ hj'
rw [if_neg hj', zero_smul]
· intro hj
have := Finset.mem_univ j
contradiction
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_transpose_apply (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) (j : n) :
(LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂ f)ᵀ j = v₂.repr (f (v₁ j)) :=
funext fun i ↦ f.toMatrix_apply _ _ i j
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_apply' (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) (i : m) (j : n) :
LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂ f i j = v₂.repr (f (v₁ j)) i :=
LinearMap.toMatrix_apply v₁ v₂ f i j
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_transpose_apply' (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) (j : n) :
(LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂ f)ᵀ j = v₂.repr (f (v₁ j)) :=
LinearMap.toMatrix_transpose_apply v₁ v₂ f j
/-- This will be a special case of `LinearMap.toMatrix_id_eq_basis_toMatrix`. -/
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_id : LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₁ id = 1 := by
ext i j
simp [LinearMap.toMatrix_apply, Matrix.one_apply, Finsupp.single_apply, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_one : LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₁ 1 = 1 :=
LinearMap.toMatrix_id v₁
@[simp]
lemma LinearMap.toMatrix_singleton {ι : Type*} [Unique ι] (f : R →ₗ[R] R) (i j : ι) :
f.toMatrix (.singleton ι R) (.singleton ι R) i j = f 1 := by
simp [toMatrix, Subsingleton.elim j default]
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLin_one : Matrix.toLin v₁ v₁ 1 = LinearMap.id := by
rw [← LinearMap.toMatrix_id v₁, Matrix.toLin_toMatrix]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_reindexRange [DecidableEq M₁] (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) (k : m) (i : n) :
LinearMap.toMatrix v₁.reindexRange v₂.reindexRange f ⟨v₂ k, Set.mem_range_self k⟩
⟨v₁ i, Set.mem_range_self i⟩ =
LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂ f k i := by
simp_rw [LinearMap.toMatrix_apply, Basis.reindexRange_self, Basis.reindexRange_repr]
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_algebraMap (x : R) :
LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₁ (algebraMap R (Module.End R M₁) x) = scalar n x := by
simp [Module.algebraMap_end_eq_smul_id, LinearMap.toMatrix_id, smul_eq_diagonal_mul]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_mulVec_repr (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) (x : M₁) :
LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂ f *ᵥ v₁.repr x = v₂.repr (f x) := by
ext i
rw [← Matrix.toLin'_apply, LinearMap.toMatrix, LinearEquiv.trans_apply, Matrix.toLin'_toMatrix',
LinearEquiv.arrowCongr_apply, v₂.equivFun_apply]
congr
exact v₁.equivFun.symm_apply_apply x
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_basis_equiv [Fintype l] [DecidableEq l] (b : Basis l R M₁)
(b' : Basis l R M₂) :
LinearMap.toMatrix b' b (b'.equiv b (Equiv.refl l) : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₁) = 1 := by
ext i j
simp [LinearMap.toMatrix_apply, Matrix.one_apply, Finsupp.single_apply, eq_comm]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_smulBasis_left {G} [Group G] [DistribMulAction G M₁]
[SMulCommClass G R M₁] (g : G) (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) :
LinearMap.toMatrix (g • v₁) v₂ f =
LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂ (f ∘ₗ DistribMulAction.toLinearMap _ _ g) := by
ext
rw [LinearMap.toMatrix_apply, LinearMap.toMatrix_apply]
dsimp
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_smulBasis_right {G} [Group G] [DistribMulAction G M₂]
[SMulCommClass G R M₂] (g : G) (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) :
LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ (g • v₂) f =
LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂ (DistribMulAction.toLinearMap _ _ g⁻¹ ∘ₗ f) := by
ext
rw [LinearMap.toMatrix_apply, LinearMap.toMatrix_apply]
dsimp
end Finite
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
variable {l m n : Type*} [Fintype n] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq n]
variable {M₁ M₂ : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M₁] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R M₁] [Module R M₂]
variable (v₁ : Basis n R M₁) (v₂ : Basis m R M₂)
theorem Matrix.toLin_apply (M : Matrix m n R) (v : M₁) :
Matrix.toLin v₁ v₂ M v = ∑ j, (M *ᵥ v₁.repr v) j • v₂ j :=
show v₂.equivFun.symm (Matrix.toLin' M (v₁.repr v)) = _ by
rw [Matrix.toLin'_apply, v₂.equivFun_symm_apply]
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLin_self (M : Matrix m n R) (i : n) :
Matrix.toLin v₁ v₂ M (v₁ i) = ∑ j, M j i • v₂ j := by
rw [Matrix.toLin_apply, Finset.sum_congr rfl fun j _hj ↦ ?_]
rw [Basis.repr_self, Matrix.mulVec, dotProduct, Finset.sum_eq_single i, Finsupp.single_eq_same,
mul_one]
· intro i' _ i'_ne
rw [Finsupp.single_eq_of_ne i'_ne.symm, mul_zero]
· intros
have := Finset.mem_univ i
contradiction
variable {M₃ : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M₃] [Module R M₃] (v₃ : Basis l R M₃)
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_comp [Finite l] [DecidableEq m] (f : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃) (g : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂) :
LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₃ (f.comp g) =
LinearMap.toMatrix v₂ v₃ f * LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₂ g := by
simp_rw [LinearMap.toMatrix, LinearEquiv.trans_apply, LinearEquiv.arrowCongr_comp _ v₂.equivFun,
LinearMap.toMatrix'_comp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_mul (f g : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) :
LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₁ (f * g) = LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₁ f * LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₁ g := by
rw [Module.End.mul_eq_comp, LinearMap.toMatrix_comp v₁ v₁ v₁ f g]
lemma LinearMap.toMatrix_pow (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) (k : ℕ) :
(toMatrix v₁ v₁ f) ^ k = toMatrix v₁ v₁ (f ^ k) := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih => rw [pow_succ, pow_succ, ih, ← toMatrix_mul]
theorem Matrix.toLin_mul [Finite l] [DecidableEq m] (A : Matrix l m R) (B : Matrix m n R) :
Matrix.toLin v₁ v₃ (A * B) = (Matrix.toLin v₂ v₃ A).comp (Matrix.toLin v₁ v₂ B) := by
apply (LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₃).injective
haveI : DecidableEq l := fun _ _ ↦ Classical.propDecidable _
rw [LinearMap.toMatrix_comp v₁ v₂ v₃]
repeat' rw [LinearMap.toMatrix_toLin]
/-- Shortcut lemma for `Matrix.toLin_mul` and `LinearMap.comp_apply`. -/
theorem Matrix.toLin_mul_apply [Finite l] [DecidableEq m] (A : Matrix l m R) (B : Matrix m n R)
(x) : Matrix.toLin v₁ v₃ (A * B) x = (Matrix.toLin v₂ v₃ A) (Matrix.toLin v₁ v₂ B x) := by
rw [Matrix.toLin_mul v₁ v₂, LinearMap.comp_apply]
/-- If `M` and `M` are each other's inverse matrices, `Matrix.toLin M` and `Matrix.toLin M'`
form a linear equivalence. -/
@[simps]
def Matrix.toLinOfInv [DecidableEq m] {M : Matrix m n R} {M' : Matrix n m R} (hMM' : M * M' = 1)
(hM'M : M' * M = 1) : M₁ ≃ₗ[R] M₂ :=
{ Matrix.toLin v₁ v₂ M with
toFun := Matrix.toLin v₁ v₂ M
invFun := Matrix.toLin v₂ v₁ M'
left_inv := fun x ↦ by rw [← Matrix.toLin_mul_apply, hM'M, Matrix.toLin_one, id_apply]
right_inv := fun x ↦ by
rw [← Matrix.toLin_mul_apply, hMM', Matrix.toLin_one, id_apply] }
/-- Given a basis of a module `M₁` over a commutative ring `R`, we get an algebra
equivalence between linear maps `M₁ →ₗ M₁` and square matrices over `R` indexed by the basis. -/
def LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv : (M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) ≃ₐ[R] Matrix n n R :=
AlgEquiv.ofLinearEquiv
(LinearMap.toMatrix v₁ v₁) (LinearMap.toMatrix_one v₁) (LinearMap.toMatrix_mul v₁)
/-- Given a basis of a module `M₁` over a commutative ring `R`, we get an algebra
equivalence between square matrices over `R` indexed by the basis and linear maps `M₁ →ₗ M₁`. -/
def Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv : Matrix n n R ≃ₐ[R] M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁ :=
(LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv v₁).symm
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv_symm :
(LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv v₁).symm = Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv v₁ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv_symm :
(Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv v₁).symm = LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv v₁ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv_toMatrixAlgEquiv (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₁) :
Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv v₁ (LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv v₁ f) = f := by
| rw [← Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv_symm, AlgEquiv.apply_symm_apply]
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv_toLinAlgEquiv (M : Matrix n n R) :
LinearMap.toMatrixAlgEquiv v₁ (Matrix.toLinAlgEquiv v₁ M) = M := by
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/ToLin.lean | 694 | 698 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Paul van Wamelen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Paul van Wamelen
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Int.NatPrime
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Int.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
/-!
# Pythagorean Triples
The main result is the classification of Pythagorean triples. The final result is for general
Pythagorean triples. It follows from the more interesting relatively prime case. We use the
"rational parametrization of the circle" method for the proof. The parametrization maps the point
`(x / z, y / z)` to the slope of the line through `(-1 , 0)` and `(x / z, y / z)`. This quickly
shows that `(x / z, y / z) = (2 * m * n / (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2), (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) / (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2))` where
`m / n` is the slope. In order to identify numerators and denominators we now need results showing
that these are coprime. This is easy except for the prime 2. In order to deal with that we have to
analyze the parity of `x`, `y`, `m` and `n` and eliminate all the impossible cases. This takes up
the bulk of the proof below.
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
theorem sq_ne_two_fin_zmod_four (z : ZMod 4) : z * z ≠ 2 := by
change Fin 4 at z
fin_cases z <;> decide
theorem Int.sq_ne_two_mod_four (z : ℤ) : z * z % 4 ≠ 2 := by
suffices ¬z * z % (4 : ℕ) = 2 % (4 : ℕ) by exact this
rw [← ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff']
simpa using sq_ne_two_fin_zmod_four _
noncomputable section
/-- Three integers `x`, `y`, and `z` form a Pythagorean triple if `x * x + y * y = z * z`. -/
def PythagoreanTriple (x y z : ℤ) : Prop :=
x * x + y * y = z * z
/-- Pythagorean triples are interchangeable, i.e `x * x + y * y = y * y + x * x = z * z`.
This comes from additive commutativity. -/
theorem pythagoreanTriple_comm {x y z : ℤ} : PythagoreanTriple x y z ↔ PythagoreanTriple y x z := by
delta PythagoreanTriple
rw [add_comm]
/-- The zeroth Pythagorean triple is all zeros. -/
theorem PythagoreanTriple.zero : PythagoreanTriple 0 0 0 := by
simp only [PythagoreanTriple, zero_mul, zero_add]
namespace PythagoreanTriple
variable {x y z : ℤ}
theorem eq (h : PythagoreanTriple x y z) : x * x + y * y = z * z :=
h
@[symm]
theorem symm (h : PythagoreanTriple x y z) : PythagoreanTriple y x z := by
rwa [pythagoreanTriple_comm]
/-- A triple is still a triple if you multiply `x`, `y` and `z`
by a constant `k`. -/
theorem mul (h : PythagoreanTriple x y z) (k : ℤ) : PythagoreanTriple (k * x) (k * y) (k * z) :=
calc
k * x * (k * x) + k * y * (k * y) = k ^ 2 * (x * x + y * y) := by ring
_ = k ^ 2 * (z * z) := by rw [h.eq]
_ = k * z * (k * z) := by ring
/-- `(k*x, k*y, k*z)` is a Pythagorean triple if and only if
`(x, y, z)` is also a triple. -/
theorem mul_iff (k : ℤ) (hk : k ≠ 0) :
PythagoreanTriple (k * x) (k * y) (k * z) ↔ PythagoreanTriple x y z := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h => h.mul k⟩
simp only [PythagoreanTriple]
intro h
rw [← mul_left_inj' (mul_ne_zero hk hk)]
convert h using 1 <;> ring
/-- A Pythagorean triple `x, y, z` is “classified” if there exist integers `k, m, n` such that
either
* `x = k * (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2)` and `y = k * (2 * m * n)`, or
* `x = k * (2 * m * n)` and `y = k * (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2)`. -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def IsClassified (_ : PythagoreanTriple x y z) :=
∃ k m n : ℤ,
(x = k * (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) ∧ y = k * (2 * m * n) ∨
x = k * (2 * m * n) ∧ y = k * (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2)) ∧
Int.gcd m n = 1
/-- A primitive Pythagorean triple `x, y, z` is a Pythagorean triple with `x` and `y` coprime.
Such a triple is “primitively classified” if there exist coprime integers `m, n` such that either
* `x = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2` and `y = 2 * m * n`, or
* `x = 2 * m * n` and `y = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2`.
-/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def IsPrimitiveClassified (_ : PythagoreanTriple x y z) :=
∃ m n : ℤ,
(x = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2 ∧ y = 2 * m * n ∨ x = 2 * m * n ∧ y = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) ∧
Int.gcd m n = 1 ∧ (m % 2 = 0 ∧ n % 2 = 1 ∨ m % 2 = 1 ∧ n % 2 = 0)
variable (h : PythagoreanTriple x y z)
include h
theorem mul_isClassified (k : ℤ) (hc : h.IsClassified) : (h.mul k).IsClassified := by
obtain ⟨l, m, n, ⟨⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, co⟩⟩ := hc
· use k * l, m, n
apply And.intro _ co
left
constructor <;> ring
· use k * l, m, n
apply And.intro _ co
right
constructor <;> ring
theorem even_odd_of_coprime (hc : Int.gcd x y = 1) :
x % 2 = 0 ∧ y % 2 = 1 ∨ x % 2 = 1 ∧ y % 2 = 0 := by
rcases Int.emod_two_eq_zero_or_one x with hx | hx <;>
rcases Int.emod_two_eq_zero_or_one y with hy | hy
-- x even, y even
· exfalso
apply Nat.not_coprime_of_dvd_of_dvd (by decide : 1 < 2) _ _ hc
· apply Int.natCast_dvd.1
apply Int.dvd_of_emod_eq_zero hx
· apply Int.natCast_dvd.1
apply Int.dvd_of_emod_eq_zero hy
-- x even, y odd
· left
exact ⟨hx, hy⟩
-- x odd, y even
· right
exact ⟨hx, hy⟩
-- x odd, y odd
· exfalso
obtain ⟨x0, y0, rfl, rfl⟩ : ∃ x0 y0, x = x0 * 2 + 1 ∧ y = y0 * 2 + 1 := by
obtain ⟨x0, hx2⟩ := exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd (Int.dvd_self_sub_of_emod_eq hx)
obtain ⟨y0, hy2⟩ := exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd (Int.dvd_self_sub_of_emod_eq hy)
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hx2 hy2
exact ⟨x0, y0, hx2, hy2⟩
apply Int.sq_ne_two_mod_four z
rw [show z * z = 4 * (x0 * x0 + x0 + y0 * y0 + y0) + 2 by
rw [← h.eq]
ring]
simp only [Int.add_emod, Int.mul_emod_right, zero_add]
decide
theorem gcd_dvd : (Int.gcd x y : ℤ) ∣ z := by
by_cases h0 : Int.gcd x y = 0
· have hx : x = 0 := by
apply Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp
apply Nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left h0
have hy : y = 0 := by
apply Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp
apply Nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right h0
have hz : z = 0 := by
simpa only [PythagoreanTriple, hx, hy, add_zero, zero_eq_mul, mul_zero,
or_self_iff] using h
simp only [hz, dvd_zero]
obtain ⟨k, x0, y0, _, h2, rfl, rfl⟩ :
∃ (k : ℕ) (x0 y0 : _), 0 < k ∧ Int.gcd x0 y0 = 1 ∧ x = x0 * k ∧ y = y0 * k :=
Int.exists_gcd_one' (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h0)
rw [Int.gcd_mul_right, h2, Int.natAbs_natCast, one_mul]
rw [← Int.pow_dvd_pow_iff two_ne_zero, sq z, ← h.eq]
rw [(by ring : x0 * k * (x0 * k) + y0 * k * (y0 * k) = (k : ℤ) ^ 2 * (x0 * x0 + y0 * y0))]
exact dvd_mul_right _ _
theorem normalize : PythagoreanTriple (x / Int.gcd x y) (y / Int.gcd x y) (z / Int.gcd x y) := by
by_cases h0 : Int.gcd x y = 0
· have hx : x = 0 := by
apply Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp
apply Nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left h0
have hy : y = 0 := by
apply Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp
apply Nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right h0
have hz : z = 0 := by
simpa only [PythagoreanTriple, hx, hy, add_zero, zero_eq_mul, mul_zero,
or_self_iff] using h
simp only [hx, hy, hz]
exact zero
rcases h.gcd_dvd with ⟨z0, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨k, x0, y0, k0, h2, rfl, rfl⟩ :
∃ (k : ℕ) (x0 y0 : _), 0 < k ∧ Int.gcd x0 y0 = 1 ∧ x = x0 * k ∧ y = y0 * k :=
Int.exists_gcd_one' (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h0)
have hk : (k : ℤ) ≠ 0 := by
norm_cast
rwa [pos_iff_ne_zero] at k0
rw [Int.gcd_mul_right, h2, Int.natAbs_natCast, one_mul] at h ⊢
rw [mul_comm x0, mul_comm y0, mul_iff k hk] at h
rwa [Int.mul_ediv_cancel _ hk, Int.mul_ediv_cancel _ hk, Int.mul_ediv_cancel_left _ hk]
theorem isClassified_of_isPrimitiveClassified (hp : h.IsPrimitiveClassified) : h.IsClassified := by
obtain ⟨m, n, H⟩ := hp
use 1, m, n
omega
theorem isClassified_of_normalize_isPrimitiveClassified (hc : h.normalize.IsPrimitiveClassified) :
h.IsClassified := by
convert h.normalize.mul_isClassified (Int.gcd x y)
(isClassified_of_isPrimitiveClassified h.normalize hc) <;>
rw [Int.mul_ediv_cancel']
· exact Int.gcd_dvd_left
· exact Int.gcd_dvd_right
· exact h.gcd_dvd
theorem ne_zero_of_coprime (hc : Int.gcd x y = 1) : z ≠ 0 := by
suffices 0 < z * z by
rintro rfl
norm_num at this
rw [← h.eq, ← sq, ← sq]
have hc' : Int.gcd x y ≠ 0 := by
rw [hc]
exact one_ne_zero
rcases Int.ne_zero_of_gcd hc' with hxz | hyz
· apply lt_add_of_pos_of_le (sq_pos_of_ne_zero hxz) (sq_nonneg y)
· apply lt_add_of_le_of_pos (sq_nonneg x) (sq_pos_of_ne_zero hyz)
theorem isPrimitiveClassified_of_coprime_of_zero_left (hc : Int.gcd x y = 1) (hx : x = 0) :
h.IsPrimitiveClassified := by
subst x
change Nat.gcd 0 (Int.natAbs y) = 1 at hc
rw [Nat.gcd_zero_left (Int.natAbs y)] at hc
rcases Int.natAbs_eq y with hy | hy
· use 1, 0
rw [hy, hc, Int.gcd_zero_right]
decide
· use 0, 1
rw [hy, hc, Int.gcd_zero_left]
decide
theorem coprime_of_coprime (hc : Int.gcd x y = 1) : Int.gcd y z = 1 := by
by_contra H
obtain ⟨p, hp, hpy, hpz⟩ := Nat.Prime.not_coprime_iff_dvd.mp H
apply hp.not_dvd_one
rw [← hc]
apply Nat.dvd_gcd (Int.Prime.dvd_natAbs_of_coe_dvd_sq hp _ _) hpy
rw [sq, eq_sub_of_add_eq h]
rw [← Int.natCast_dvd] at hpy hpz
exact dvd_sub (hpz.mul_right _) (hpy.mul_right _)
end PythagoreanTriple
section circleEquivGen
/-!
### A parametrization of the unit circle
For the classification of Pythagorean triples, we will use a parametrization of the unit circle.
-/
variable {K : Type*} [Field K]
/-- A parameterization of the unit circle that is useful for classifying Pythagorean triples.
(To be applied in the case where `K = ℚ`.) -/
def circleEquivGen (hk : ∀ x : K, 1 + x ^ 2 ≠ 0) :
K ≃ { p : K × K // p.1 ^ 2 + p.2 ^ 2 = 1 ∧ p.2 ≠ -1 } where
toFun x :=
⟨⟨2 * x / (1 + x ^ 2), (1 - x ^ 2) / (1 + x ^ 2)⟩, by
field_simp [hk x, div_pow]
ring, by
simp only [Ne, div_eq_iff (hk x), neg_mul, one_mul, neg_add, sub_eq_add_neg, add_left_inj]
simpa only [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, one_pow] using hk 1⟩
invFun p := (p : K × K).1 / ((p : K × K).2 + 1)
left_inv x := by
have h2 : (1 + 1 : K) = 2 := by norm_num
have h3 : (2 : K) ≠ 0 := by
convert hk 1
rw [one_pow 2, h2]
field_simp [hk x, h2, add_assoc, add_comm, add_sub_cancel, mul_comm]
right_inv := fun ⟨⟨x, y⟩, hxy, hy⟩ => by
change x ^ 2 + y ^ 2 = 1 at hxy
have h2 : y + 1 ≠ 0 := mt eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_left hy
have h3 : (y + 1) ^ 2 + x ^ 2 = 2 * (y + 1) := by
rw [(add_neg_eq_iff_eq_add.mpr hxy.symm).symm]
ring
have h4 : (2 : K) ≠ 0 := by
convert hk 1
rw [one_pow 2]
ring
simp only [Prod.mk_inj, Subtype.mk_eq_mk]
constructor
· field_simp [h3]
ring
· field_simp [h3]
rw [← add_neg_eq_iff_eq_add.mpr hxy.symm]
ring
@[simp]
theorem circleEquivGen_apply (hk : ∀ x : K, 1 + x ^ 2 ≠ 0) (x : K) :
(circleEquivGen hk x : K × K) = ⟨2 * x / (1 + x ^ 2), (1 - x ^ 2) / (1 + x ^ 2)⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem circleEquivGen_symm_apply (hk : ∀ x : K, 1 + x ^ 2 ≠ 0)
(v : { p : K × K // p.1 ^ 2 + p.2 ^ 2 = 1 ∧ p.2 ≠ -1 }) :
(circleEquivGen hk).symm v = (v : K × K).1 / ((v : K × K).2 + 1) :=
rfl
end circleEquivGen
private theorem coprime_sq_sub_sq_add_of_even_odd {m n : ℤ} (h : Int.gcd m n = 1) (hm : m % 2 = 0)
(hn : n % 2 = 1) : Int.gcd (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) = 1 := by
by_contra H
obtain ⟨p, hp, hp1, hp2⟩ := Nat.Prime.not_coprime_iff_dvd.mp H
rw [← Int.natCast_dvd] at hp1 hp2
have h2m : (p : ℤ) ∣ 2 * m ^ 2 := by
convert dvd_add hp2 hp1 using 1
ring
have h2n : (p : ℤ) ∣ 2 * n ^ 2 := by
convert dvd_sub hp2 hp1 using 1
ring
have hmc : p = 2 ∨ p ∣ Int.natAbs m := prime_two_or_dvd_of_dvd_two_mul_pow_self_two hp h2m
have hnc : p = 2 ∨ p ∣ Int.natAbs n := prime_two_or_dvd_of_dvd_two_mul_pow_self_two hp h2n
by_cases h2 : p = 2
· have h3 : (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) % 2 = 1 := by
simp only [sq, Int.add_emod, Int.mul_emod, hm, hn, dvd_refl, Int.emod_emod_of_dvd]
decide
have h4 : (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) % 2 = 0 := by
apply Int.emod_eq_zero_of_dvd
rwa [h2] at hp2
rw [h4] at h3
exact zero_ne_one h3
· apply hp.not_dvd_one
rw [← h]
exact Nat.dvd_gcd (Or.resolve_left hmc h2) (Or.resolve_left hnc h2)
private theorem coprime_sq_sub_sq_add_of_odd_even {m n : ℤ} (h : Int.gcd m n = 1) (hm : m % 2 = 1)
(hn : n % 2 = 0) : Int.gcd (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) = 1 := by
rw [Int.gcd, ← Int.natAbs_neg (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2)]
rw [(by ring : -(m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) = n ^ 2 - m ^ 2), add_comm]
apply coprime_sq_sub_sq_add_of_even_odd _ hn hm; rwa [Int.gcd_comm]
private theorem coprime_sq_sub_mul_of_even_odd {m n : ℤ} (h : Int.gcd m n = 1) (hm : m % 2 = 0)
(hn : n % 2 = 1) : Int.gcd (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) (2 * m * n) = 1 := by
by_contra H
obtain ⟨p, hp, hp1, hp2⟩ := Nat.Prime.not_coprime_iff_dvd.mp H
rw [← Int.natCast_dvd] at hp1 hp2
have hnp : ¬(p : ℤ) ∣ Int.gcd m n := by
rw [h]
norm_cast
exact mt Nat.dvd_one.mp (Nat.Prime.ne_one hp)
rcases Int.Prime.dvd_mul hp hp2 with hp2m | hpn
· rw [Int.natAbs_mul] at hp2m
rcases (Nat.Prime.dvd_mul hp).mp hp2m with hp2 | hpm
· have hp2' : p = 2 := (Nat.le_of_dvd zero_lt_two hp2).antisymm hp.two_le
revert hp1
rw [hp2']
apply mt Int.emod_eq_zero_of_dvd
simp only [sq, Nat.cast_ofNat, Int.sub_emod, Int.mul_emod, hm, hn,
mul_zero, EuclideanDomain.zero_mod, mul_one, zero_sub]
decide
apply mt (Int.dvd_coe_gcd (Int.natCast_dvd.mpr hpm)) hnp
apply or_self_iff.mp
apply Int.Prime.dvd_mul' hp
rw [(by ring : n * n = -(m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) + m * m)]
exact hp1.neg_right.add ((Int.natCast_dvd.2 hpm).mul_right _)
rw [Int.gcd_comm] at hnp
apply mt (Int.dvd_coe_gcd (Int.natCast_dvd.mpr hpn)) hnp
apply or_self_iff.mp
apply Int.Prime.dvd_mul' hp
rw [(by ring : m * m = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2 + n * n)]
apply dvd_add hp1
exact (Int.natCast_dvd.mpr hpn).mul_right n
private theorem coprime_sq_sub_mul_of_odd_even {m n : ℤ} (h : Int.gcd m n = 1) (hm : m % 2 = 1)
(hn : n % 2 = 0) : Int.gcd (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) (2 * m * n) = 1 := by
rw [Int.gcd, ← Int.natAbs_neg (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2)]
rw [(by ring : 2 * m * n = 2 * n * m), (by ring : -(m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) = n ^ 2 - m ^ 2)]
apply coprime_sq_sub_mul_of_even_odd _ hn hm; rwa [Int.gcd_comm]
private theorem coprime_sq_sub_mul {m n : ℤ} (h : Int.gcd m n = 1)
(hmn : m % 2 = 0 ∧ n % 2 = 1 ∨ m % 2 = 1 ∧ n % 2 = 0) :
Int.gcd (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) (2 * m * n) = 1 := by
rcases hmn with h1 | h2
· exact coprime_sq_sub_mul_of_even_odd h h1.left h1.right
· exact coprime_sq_sub_mul_of_odd_even h h2.left h2.right
private theorem coprime_sq_sub_sq_sum_of_odd_odd {m n : ℤ} (h : Int.gcd m n = 1) (hm : m % 2 = 1)
(hn : n % 2 = 1) :
2 ∣ m ^ 2 + n ^ 2 ∧
2 ∣ m ^ 2 - n ^ 2 ∧
(m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) / 2 % 2 = 0 ∧ Int.gcd ((m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) / 2) ((m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) / 2) = 1 := by
obtain ⟨m0, hm2⟩ := exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd (Int.dvd_self_sub_of_emod_eq hm)
obtain ⟨n0, hn2⟩ := exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd (Int.dvd_self_sub_of_emod_eq hn)
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hm2 hn2
subst m
subst n
have h1 : (m0 * 2 + 1) ^ 2 + (n0 * 2 + 1) ^ 2 = 2 * (2 * (m0 ^ 2 + n0 ^ 2 + m0 + n0) + 1) := by
ring
have h2 : (m0 * 2 + 1) ^ 2 - (n0 * 2 + 1) ^ 2 = 2 * (2 * (m0 ^ 2 - n0 ^ 2 + m0 - n0)) := by ring
have h3 : ((m0 * 2 + 1) ^ 2 - (n0 * 2 + 1) ^ 2) / 2 % 2 = 0 := by
rw [h2, Int.mul_ediv_cancel_left, Int.mul_emod_right]
decide
refine ⟨⟨_, h1⟩, ⟨_, h2⟩, h3, ?_⟩
have h20 : (2 : ℤ) ≠ 0 := by decide
rw [h1, h2, Int.mul_ediv_cancel_left _ h20, Int.mul_ediv_cancel_left _ h20]
by_contra h4
obtain ⟨p, hp, hp1, hp2⟩ := Nat.Prime.not_coprime_iff_dvd.mp h4
apply hp.not_dvd_one
rw [← h]
rw [← Int.natCast_dvd] at hp1 hp2
apply Nat.dvd_gcd
· apply Int.Prime.dvd_natAbs_of_coe_dvd_sq hp
convert dvd_add hp1 hp2
ring
· apply Int.Prime.dvd_natAbs_of_coe_dvd_sq hp
convert dvd_sub hp2 hp1
ring
namespace PythagoreanTriple
variable {x y z : ℤ} (h : PythagoreanTriple x y z)
theorem isPrimitiveClassified_aux (hc : x.gcd y = 1) (hzpos : 0 < z) {m n : ℤ}
(hm2n2 : 0 < m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) (hv2 : (x : ℚ) / z = 2 * m * n / ((m : ℚ) ^ 2 + (n : ℚ) ^ 2))
(hw2 : (y : ℚ) / z = ((m : ℚ) ^ 2 - (n : ℚ) ^ 2) / ((m : ℚ) ^ 2 + (n : ℚ) ^ 2))
(H : Int.gcd (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) = 1) (co : Int.gcd m n = 1)
(pp : m % 2 = 0 ∧ n % 2 = 1 ∨ m % 2 = 1 ∧ n % 2 = 0) : h.IsPrimitiveClassified := by
have hz : z ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt hzpos
have h2 : y = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2 ∧ z = m ^ 2 + n ^ 2 := by
apply Rat.div_int_inj hzpos hm2n2 (h.coprime_of_coprime hc) H
rw [hw2]
norm_cast
use m, n
apply And.intro _ (And.intro co pp)
right
refine ⟨?_, h2.left⟩
rw [← Rat.coe_int_inj _ _, ← div_left_inj' ((mt (Rat.coe_int_inj z 0).mp) hz), hv2, h2.right]
norm_cast
theorem isPrimitiveClassified_of_coprime_of_odd_of_pos (hc : Int.gcd x y = 1) (hyo : y % 2 = 1)
(hzpos : 0 < z) : h.IsPrimitiveClassified := by
by_cases h0 : x = 0
· exact h.isPrimitiveClassified_of_coprime_of_zero_left hc h0
let v := (x : ℚ) / z
let w := (y : ℚ) / z
have hq : v ^ 2 + w ^ 2 = 1 := by
field_simp [v, w, sq]
norm_cast
have hvz : v ≠ 0 := by
field_simp [v]
exact h0
have hw1 : w ≠ -1 := by
contrapose! hvz with hw1
rw [hw1, neg_sq, one_pow, add_eq_right] at hq
exact pow_eq_zero hq
have hQ : ∀ x : ℚ, 1 + x ^ 2 ≠ 0 := by
intro q
apply ne_of_gt
exact lt_add_of_pos_of_le zero_lt_one (sq_nonneg q)
have hp : (⟨v, w⟩ : ℚ × ℚ) ∈ { p : ℚ × ℚ | p.1 ^ 2 + p.2 ^ 2 = 1 ∧ p.2 ≠ -1 } := ⟨hq, hw1⟩
let q := (circleEquivGen hQ).symm ⟨⟨v, w⟩, hp⟩
have ht4 : v = 2 * q / (1 + q ^ 2) ∧ w = (1 - q ^ 2) / (1 + q ^ 2) := by
apply Prod.mk.inj
exact congr_arg Subtype.val ((circleEquivGen hQ).apply_symm_apply ⟨⟨v, w⟩, hp⟩).symm
let m := (q.den : ℤ)
let n := q.num
have hm0 : m ≠ 0 := by
-- Added to adapt to https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2734.
-- Without `unfold`, `norm_cast` can't see the coercion.
-- One might try `zeta := true` in `Tactic.NormCast.derive`,
-- but that seems to break many other things.
unfold m
norm_cast
apply Rat.den_nz q
have hq2 : q = n / m := (Rat.num_div_den q).symm
have hm2n2 : 0 < m ^ 2 + n ^ 2 := by positivity
have hm2n20 : (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2 : ℚ) ≠ 0 := by positivity
have hx1 {j k : ℚ} (h₁ : k ≠ 0) (h₂ : k ^ 2 + j ^ 2 ≠ 0) :
(1 - (j / k) ^ 2) / (1 + (j / k) ^ 2) = (k ^ 2 - j ^ 2) / (k ^ 2 + j ^ 2) := by
field_simp
have hw2 : w = ((m : ℚ) ^ 2 - (n : ℚ) ^ 2) / ((m : ℚ) ^ 2 + (n : ℚ) ^ 2) := by
calc
w = (1 - q ^ 2) / (1 + q ^ 2) := by apply ht4.2
_ = (1 - (↑n / ↑m) ^ 2) / (1 + (↑n / ↑m) ^ 2) := by rw [hq2]
_ = _ := by exact hx1 (Int.cast_ne_zero.mpr hm0) hm2n20
have hx2 {j k : ℚ} (h₁ : k ≠ 0) (h₂ : k ^ 2 + j ^ 2 ≠ 0) :
2 * (j / k) / (1 + (j / k) ^ 2) = 2 * k * j / (k ^ 2 + j ^ 2) :=
have h₃ : k * (k ^ 2 + j ^ 2) ≠ 0 := mul_ne_zero h₁ h₂
by field_simp; ring
have hv2 : v = 2 * m * n / ((m : ℚ) ^ 2 + (n : ℚ) ^ 2) := by
calc
v = 2 * q / (1 + q ^ 2) := by apply ht4.1
_ = 2 * (n / m) / (1 + (↑n / ↑m) ^ 2) := by rw [hq2]
_ = _ := by exact hx2 (Int.cast_ne_zero.mpr hm0) hm2n20
have hnmcp : Int.gcd n m = 1 := q.reduced
have hmncp : Int.gcd m n = 1 := by
rw [Int.gcd_comm]
exact hnmcp
rcases Int.emod_two_eq_zero_or_one m with hm2 | hm2 <;>
rcases Int.emod_two_eq_zero_or_one n with hn2 | hn2
· -- m even, n even
exfalso
have h1 : 2 ∣ (Int.gcd n m : ℤ) :=
Int.dvd_coe_gcd (Int.dvd_of_emod_eq_zero hn2) (Int.dvd_of_emod_eq_zero hm2)
rw [hnmcp] at h1
revert h1
decide
· -- m even, n odd
apply h.isPrimitiveClassified_aux hc hzpos hm2n2 hv2 hw2 _ hmncp
· apply Or.intro_left
exact And.intro hm2 hn2
· apply coprime_sq_sub_sq_add_of_even_odd hmncp hm2 hn2
· -- m odd, n even
apply h.isPrimitiveClassified_aux hc hzpos hm2n2 hv2 hw2 _ hmncp
· apply Or.intro_right
exact And.intro hm2 hn2
apply coprime_sq_sub_sq_add_of_odd_even hmncp hm2 hn2
· -- m odd, n odd
exfalso
have h1 :
2 ∣ m ^ 2 + n ^ 2 ∧
2 ∣ m ^ 2 - n ^ 2 ∧
(m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) / 2 % 2 = 0 ∧ Int.gcd ((m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) / 2) ((m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) / 2) = 1 :=
coprime_sq_sub_sq_sum_of_odd_odd hmncp hm2 hn2
have h2 : y = (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) / 2 ∧ z = (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) / 2 := by
apply Rat.div_int_inj hzpos _ (h.coprime_of_coprime hc) h1.2.2.2
· show w = _
rw [← Rat.divInt_eq_div, ← Rat.divInt_mul_right (by norm_num : (2 : ℤ) ≠ 0)]
rw [Int.ediv_mul_cancel h1.1, Int.ediv_mul_cancel h1.2.1, hw2, Rat.divInt_eq_div]
norm_cast
· apply (mul_lt_mul_right (by norm_num : 0 < (2 : ℤ))).mp
rw [Int.ediv_mul_cancel h1.1, zero_mul]
exact hm2n2
norm_num [h2.1, h1.2.2.1] at hyo
theorem isPrimitiveClassified_of_coprime_of_pos (hc : Int.gcd x y = 1) (hzpos : 0 < z) :
h.IsPrimitiveClassified := by
rcases h.even_odd_of_coprime hc with h1 | h2
· exact h.isPrimitiveClassified_of_coprime_of_odd_of_pos hc h1.right hzpos
rw [Int.gcd_comm] at hc
obtain ⟨m, n, H⟩ := h.symm.isPrimitiveClassified_of_coprime_of_odd_of_pos hc h2.left hzpos
use m, n; tauto
theorem isPrimitiveClassified_of_coprime (hc : Int.gcd x y = 1) : h.IsPrimitiveClassified := by
by_cases hz : 0 < z
· exact h.isPrimitiveClassified_of_coprime_of_pos hc hz
have h' : PythagoreanTriple x y (-z) := by simpa [PythagoreanTriple, neg_mul_neg] using h.eq
apply h'.isPrimitiveClassified_of_coprime_of_pos hc
apply lt_of_le_of_ne _ (h'.ne_zero_of_coprime hc).symm
exact le_neg.mp (not_lt.mp hz)
theorem classified : h.IsClassified := by
by_cases h0 : Int.gcd x y = 0
· have hx : x = 0 := by
apply Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp
apply Nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left h0
have hy : y = 0 := by
apply Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp
apply Nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right h0
use 0, 1, 0
field_simp [hx, hy]
apply h.isClassified_of_normalize_isPrimitiveClassified
apply h.normalize.isPrimitiveClassified_of_coprime
apply Int.gcd_div_gcd_div_gcd (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h0)
theorem coprime_classification :
PythagoreanTriple x y z ∧ Int.gcd x y = 1 ↔
∃ m n,
(x = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2 ∧ y = 2 * m * n ∨ x = 2 * m * n ∧ y = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) ∧
(z = m ^ 2 + n ^ 2 ∨ z = -(m ^ 2 + n ^ 2)) ∧
Int.gcd m n = 1 ∧ (m % 2 = 0 ∧ n % 2 = 1 ∨ m % 2 = 1 ∧ n % 2 = 0) := by
constructor
· intro h
obtain ⟨m, n, H⟩ := h.left.isPrimitiveClassified_of_coprime h.right
use m, n
rcases H with ⟨⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, co, pp⟩
· refine ⟨Or.inl ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, ?_, co, pp⟩
have : z ^ 2 = (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) ^ 2 := by
rw [sq, ← h.left.eq]
ring
simpa using eq_or_eq_neg_of_sq_eq_sq _ _ this
· refine ⟨Or.inr ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, ?_, co, pp⟩
have : z ^ 2 = (m ^ 2 + n ^ 2) ^ 2 := by
rw [sq, ← h.left.eq]
ring
simpa using eq_or_eq_neg_of_sq_eq_sq _ _ this
· delta PythagoreanTriple
rintro ⟨m, n, ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, rfl | rfl, co, pp⟩ <;>
first
| constructor; ring; exact coprime_sq_sub_mul co pp
| constructor; ring; rw [Int.gcd_comm]; exact coprime_sq_sub_mul co pp
/-- By assuming `x` is odd and `z` is positive we get a slightly more precise classification of
the Pythagorean triple `x ^ 2 + y ^ 2 = z ^ 2`. -/
theorem coprime_classification' {x y z : ℤ} (h : PythagoreanTriple x y z)
(h_coprime : Int.gcd x y = 1) (h_parity : x % 2 = 1) (h_pos : 0 < z) :
∃ m n,
x = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2 ∧
y = 2 * m * n ∧
z = m ^ 2 + n ^ 2 ∧
Int.gcd m n = 1 ∧ (m % 2 = 0 ∧ n % 2 = 1 ∨ m % 2 = 1 ∧ n % 2 = 0) ∧ 0 ≤ m := by
obtain ⟨m, n, ht1, ht2, ht3, ht4⟩ :=
PythagoreanTriple.coprime_classification.mp (And.intro h h_coprime)
rcases le_or_lt 0 m with hm | hm
· use m, n
| rcases ht1 with h_odd | h_even
· apply And.intro h_odd.1
apply And.intro h_odd.2
rcases ht2 with h_pos | h_neg
· apply And.intro h_pos (And.intro ht3 (And.intro ht4 hm))
· exfalso
revert h_pos
rw [h_neg]
exact imp_false.mpr (not_lt.mpr (neg_nonpos.mpr (add_nonneg (sq_nonneg m) (sq_nonneg n))))
exfalso
rcases h_even with ⟨rfl, -⟩
rw [mul_assoc, Int.mul_emod_right] at h_parity
exact zero_ne_one h_parity
· use -m, -n
rcases ht1 with h_odd | h_even
· rw [neg_sq m]
rw [neg_sq n]
apply And.intro h_odd.1
constructor
· rw [h_odd.2]
ring
rcases ht2 with h_pos | h_neg
· apply And.intro h_pos
constructor
· delta Int.gcd
rw [Int.natAbs_neg, Int.natAbs_neg]
exact ht3
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/PythagoreanTriples.lean | 598 | 624 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Defs
import Mathlib.Logic.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.ExistsUnique
import Mathlib.Logic.Nonempty
import Mathlib.Logic.Nontrivial.Defs
import Batteries.Tactic.Init
import Mathlib.Order.Defs.Unbundled
/-!
# Miscellaneous function constructions and lemmas
-/
open Function
universe u v w
namespace Function
section
variable {α β γ : Sort*} {f : α → β}
/-- Evaluate a function at an argument. Useful if you want to talk about the partially applied
`Function.eval x : (∀ x, β x) → β x`. -/
@[reducible, simp] def eval {β : α → Sort*} (x : α) (f : ∀ x, β x) : β x := f x
theorem eval_apply {β : α → Sort*} (x : α) (f : ∀ x, β x) : eval x f = f x :=
rfl
theorem const_def {y : β} : (fun _ : α ↦ y) = const α y :=
rfl
theorem const_injective [Nonempty α] : Injective (const α : β → α → β) := fun _ _ h ↦
let ⟨x⟩ := ‹Nonempty α›
congr_fun h x
@[simp]
theorem const_inj [Nonempty α] {y₁ y₂ : β} : const α y₁ = const α y₂ ↔ y₁ = y₂ :=
⟨fun h ↦ const_injective h, fun h ↦ h ▸ rfl⟩
theorem onFun_apply (f : β → β → γ) (g : α → β) (a b : α) : onFun f g a b = f (g a) (g b) :=
rfl
lemma hfunext {α α' : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} {β' : α' → Sort v} {f : ∀a, β a} {f' : ∀a, β' a}
(hα : α = α') (h : ∀a a', HEq a a' → HEq (f a) (f' a')) : HEq f f' := by
subst hα
have : ∀a, HEq (f a) (f' a) := fun a ↦ h a a (HEq.refl a)
have : β = β' := by funext a; exact type_eq_of_heq (this a)
subst this
apply heq_of_eq
funext a
exact eq_of_heq (this a)
theorem ne_iff {β : α → Sort*} {f₁ f₂ : ∀ a, β a} : f₁ ≠ f₂ ↔ ∃ a, f₁ a ≠ f₂ a :=
funext_iff.not.trans not_forall
lemma funext_iff_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] {g : α → β} (x y : α) :
f x = g y ↔ f = g := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ funext fun z ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rwa [Subsingleton.elim x z, Subsingleton.elim y z] at h
· rw [h, Subsingleton.elim x y]
theorem swap_lt {α} [LT α] : swap (· < · : α → α → _) = (· > ·) := rfl
theorem swap_le {α} [LE α] : swap (· ≤ · : α → α → _) = (· ≥ ·) := rfl
theorem swap_gt {α} [LT α] : swap (· > · : α → α → _) = (· < ·) := rfl
theorem swap_ge {α} [LE α] : swap (· ≥ · : α → α → _) = (· ≤ ·) := rfl
protected theorem Bijective.injective {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) : Injective f := hf.1
protected theorem Bijective.surjective {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) : Surjective f := hf.2
theorem not_injective_iff : ¬ Injective f ↔ ∃ a b, f a = f b ∧ a ≠ b := by
simp only [Injective, not_forall, exists_prop]
/-- If the co-domain `β` of an injective function `f : α → β` has decidable equality, then
the domain `α` also has decidable equality. -/
protected def Injective.decidableEq [DecidableEq β] (I : Injective f) : DecidableEq α :=
fun _ _ ↦ decidable_of_iff _ I.eq_iff
theorem Injective.of_comp {g : γ → α} (I : Injective (f ∘ g)) : Injective g :=
fun _ _ h ↦ I <| congr_arg f h
@[simp]
theorem Injective.of_comp_iff (hf : Injective f) (g : γ → α) :
Injective (f ∘ g) ↔ Injective g :=
⟨Injective.of_comp, hf.comp⟩
theorem Injective.of_comp_right {g : γ → α} (I : Injective (f ∘ g)) (hg : Surjective g) :
Injective f := fun x y h ↦ by
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := hg x
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := hg y
exact congr_arg g (I h)
theorem Surjective.bijective₂_of_injective {g : γ → α} (hf : Surjective f) (hg : Surjective g)
(I : Injective (f ∘ g)) : Bijective f ∧ Bijective g :=
⟨⟨I.of_comp_right hg, hf⟩, I.of_comp, hg⟩
@[simp]
theorem Injective.of_comp_iff' (f : α → β) {g : γ → α} (hg : Bijective g) :
Injective (f ∘ g) ↔ Injective f :=
⟨fun I ↦ I.of_comp_right hg.2, fun h ↦ h.comp hg.injective⟩
theorem Injective.piMap {ι : Sort*} {α β : ι → Sort*} {f : ∀ i, α i → β i}
(hf : ∀ i, Injective (f i)) : Injective (Pi.map f) := fun _ _ h ↦
funext fun i ↦ hf i <| congrFun h _
/-- Composition by an injective function on the left is itself injective. -/
theorem Injective.comp_left {g : β → γ} (hg : Injective g) : Injective (g ∘ · : (α → β) → α → γ) :=
.piMap fun _ ↦ hg
theorem injective_comp_left_iff [Nonempty α] {g : β → γ} :
Injective (g ∘ · : (α → β) → α → γ) ↔ Injective g :=
⟨fun h b₁ b₂ eq ↦ Nonempty.elim ‹_›
(congr_fun <| h (a₁ := fun _ ↦ b₁) (a₂ := fun _ ↦ b₂) <| funext fun _ ↦ eq), (·.comp_left)⟩
@[nontriviality] theorem injective_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (f : α → β) : Injective f :=
fun _ _ _ ↦ Subsingleton.elim _ _
@[nontriviality] theorem bijective_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (f : α → α) : Bijective f :=
⟨injective_of_subsingleton f, fun a ↦ ⟨a, Subsingleton.elim ..⟩⟩
lemma Injective.dite (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
{f : {a : α // p a} → β} {f' : {a : α // ¬ p a} → β}
(hf : Injective f) (hf' : Injective f')
(im_disj : ∀ {x x' : α} {hx : p x} {hx' : ¬ p x'}, f ⟨x, hx⟩ ≠ f' ⟨x', hx'⟩) :
Function.Injective (fun x ↦ if h : p x then f ⟨x, h⟩ else f' ⟨x, h⟩) := fun x₁ x₂ h => by
dsimp only at h
by_cases h₁ : p x₁ <;> by_cases h₂ : p x₂
· rw [dif_pos h₁, dif_pos h₂] at h; injection (hf h)
· rw [dif_pos h₁, dif_neg h₂] at h; exact (im_disj h).elim
· rw [dif_neg h₁, dif_pos h₂] at h; exact (im_disj h.symm).elim
· rw [dif_neg h₁, dif_neg h₂] at h; injection (hf' h)
theorem Surjective.of_comp {g : γ → α} (S : Surjective (f ∘ g)) : Surjective f := fun y ↦
let ⟨x, h⟩ := S y
⟨g x, h⟩
@[simp]
theorem Surjective.of_comp_iff (f : α → β) {g : γ → α} (hg : Surjective g) :
Surjective (f ∘ g) ↔ Surjective f :=
⟨Surjective.of_comp, fun h ↦ h.comp hg⟩
theorem Surjective.of_comp_left {g : γ → α} (S : Surjective (f ∘ g)) (hf : Injective f) :
Surjective g := fun a ↦ let ⟨c, hc⟩ := S (f a); ⟨c, hf hc⟩
theorem Injective.bijective₂_of_surjective {g : γ → α} (hf : Injective f) (hg : Injective g)
(S : Surjective (f ∘ g)) : Bijective f ∧ Bijective g :=
⟨⟨hf, S.of_comp⟩, hg, S.of_comp_left hf⟩
@[simp]
theorem Surjective.of_comp_iff' (hf : Bijective f) (g : γ → α) :
Surjective (f ∘ g) ↔ Surjective g :=
⟨fun S ↦ S.of_comp_left hf.1, hf.surjective.comp⟩
instance decidableEqPFun (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (α : p → Type*) [∀ hp, DecidableEq (α hp)] :
DecidableEq (∀ hp, α hp)
| f, g => decidable_of_iff (∀ hp, f hp = g hp) funext_iff.symm
protected theorem Surjective.forall (hf : Surjective f) {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ y, p y) ↔ ∀ x, p (f x) :=
⟨fun h x ↦ h (f x), fun h y ↦
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf y
hx ▸ h x⟩
protected theorem Surjective.forall₂ (hf : Surjective f) {p : β → β → Prop} :
(∀ y₁ y₂, p y₁ y₂) ↔ ∀ x₁ x₂, p (f x₁) (f x₂) :=
hf.forall.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ ↦ hf.forall
protected theorem Surjective.forall₃ (hf : Surjective f) {p : β → β → β → Prop} :
(∀ y₁ y₂ y₃, p y₁ y₂ y₃) ↔ ∀ x₁ x₂ x₃, p (f x₁) (f x₂) (f x₃) :=
hf.forall.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ ↦ hf.forall₂
protected theorem Surjective.exists (hf : Surjective f) {p : β → Prop} :
(∃ y, p y) ↔ ∃ x, p (f x) :=
⟨fun ⟨y, hy⟩ ↦
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf y
⟨x, hx.symm ▸ hy⟩,
fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ↦ ⟨f x, hx⟩⟩
protected theorem Surjective.exists₂ (hf : Surjective f) {p : β → β → Prop} :
(∃ y₁ y₂, p y₁ y₂) ↔ ∃ x₁ x₂, p (f x₁) (f x₂) :=
hf.exists.trans <| exists_congr fun _ ↦ hf.exists
protected theorem Surjective.exists₃ (hf : Surjective f) {p : β → β → β → Prop} :
(∃ y₁ y₂ y₃, p y₁ y₂ y₃) ↔ ∃ x₁ x₂ x₃, p (f x₁) (f x₂) (f x₃) :=
hf.exists.trans <| exists_congr fun _ ↦ hf.exists₂
theorem Surjective.injective_comp_right (hf : Surjective f) : Injective fun g : β → γ ↦ g ∘ f :=
fun _ _ h ↦ funext <| hf.forall.2 <| congr_fun h
theorem injective_comp_right_iff_surjective {γ : Type*} [Nontrivial γ] :
Injective (fun g : β → γ ↦ g ∘ f) ↔ Surjective f := by
refine ⟨not_imp_not.mp fun not_surj inj ↦ not_subsingleton γ ⟨fun c c' ↦ ?_⟩,
(·.injective_comp_right)⟩
have ⟨b₀, hb⟩ := not_forall.mp not_surj
classical have := inj (a₁ := fun _ ↦ c) (a₂ := (if · = b₀ then c' else c)) ?_
· simpa using congr_fun this b₀
ext a; simp only [comp_apply, if_neg fun h ↦ hb ⟨a, h⟩]
protected theorem Surjective.right_cancellable (hf : Surjective f) {g₁ g₂ : β → γ} :
g₁ ∘ f = g₂ ∘ f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
hf.injective_comp_right.eq_iff
theorem surjective_of_right_cancellable_Prop (h : ∀ g₁ g₂ : β → Prop, g₁ ∘ f = g₂ ∘ f → g₁ = g₂) :
Surjective f :=
injective_comp_right_iff_surjective.mp h
theorem bijective_iff_existsUnique (f : α → β) : Bijective f ↔ ∀ b : β, ∃! a : α, f a = b :=
⟨fun hf b ↦
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := hf.surjective b
⟨a, ha, fun _ ha' ↦ hf.injective (ha'.trans ha.symm)⟩,
fun he ↦ ⟨fun {_a a'} h ↦ (he (f a')).unique h rfl, fun b ↦ (he b).exists⟩⟩
/-- Shorthand for using projection notation with `Function.bijective_iff_existsUnique`. -/
protected theorem Bijective.existsUnique {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) (b : β) :
∃! a : α, f a = b :=
(bijective_iff_existsUnique f).mp hf b
theorem Bijective.existsUnique_iff {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) {p : β → Prop} :
(∃! y, p y) ↔ ∃! x, p (f x) :=
⟨fun ⟨y, hpy, hy⟩ ↦
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf.surjective y
⟨x, by simpa [hx], fun z (hz : p (f z)) ↦ hf.injective <| hx.symm ▸ hy _ hz⟩,
fun ⟨x, hpx, hx⟩ ↦
⟨f x, hpx, fun y hy ↦
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := hf.surjective y
hz ▸ congr_arg f (hx _ (by simpa [hz]))⟩⟩
theorem Bijective.of_comp_iff (f : α → β) {g : γ → α} (hg : Bijective g) :
Bijective (f ∘ g) ↔ Bijective f :=
and_congr (Injective.of_comp_iff' _ hg) (Surjective.of_comp_iff _ hg.surjective)
theorem Bijective.of_comp_iff' {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) (g : γ → α) :
Function.Bijective (f ∘ g) ↔ Function.Bijective g :=
and_congr (Injective.of_comp_iff hf.injective _) (Surjective.of_comp_iff' hf _)
/-- **Cantor's diagonal argument** implies that there are no surjective functions from `α`
to `Set α`. -/
theorem cantor_surjective {α} (f : α → Set α) : ¬Surjective f
| h => let ⟨D, e⟩ := h {a | ¬ f a a}
@iff_not_self (D ∈ f D) <| iff_of_eq <| congr_arg (D ∈ ·) e
/-- **Cantor's diagonal argument** implies that there are no injective functions from `Set α`
to `α`. -/
theorem cantor_injective {α : Type*} (f : Set α → α) : ¬Injective f
| i => cantor_surjective (fun a ↦ {b | ∀ U, a = f U → U b}) <|
RightInverse.surjective (fun U ↦ Set.ext fun _ ↦ ⟨fun h ↦ h U rfl, fun h _ e ↦ i e ▸ h⟩)
/-- There is no surjection from `α : Type u` into `Type (max u v)`. This theorem
demonstrates why `Type : Type` would be inconsistent in Lean. -/
theorem not_surjective_Type {α : Type u} (f : α → Type max u v) : ¬Surjective f := by
intro hf
let T : Type max u v := Sigma f
cases hf (Set T) with | intro U hU =>
let g : Set T → T := fun s ↦ ⟨U, cast hU.symm s⟩
have hg : Injective g := by
intro s t h
suffices cast hU (g s).2 = cast hU (g t).2 by
simp only [g, cast_cast, cast_eq] at this
assumption
· congr
exact cantor_injective g hg
/-- `g` is a partial inverse to `f` (an injective but not necessarily
surjective function) if `g y = some x` implies `f x = y`, and `g y = none`
implies that `y` is not in the range of `f`. -/
def IsPartialInv {α β} (f : α → β) (g : β → Option α) : Prop :=
∀ x y, g y = some x ↔ f x = y
theorem isPartialInv_left {α β} {f : α → β} {g} (H : IsPartialInv f g) (x) : g (f x) = some x :=
(H _ _).2 rfl
theorem injective_of_isPartialInv {α β} {f : α → β} {g} (H : IsPartialInv f g) :
Injective f := fun _ _ h ↦
Option.some.inj <| ((H _ _).2 h).symm.trans ((H _ _).2 rfl)
theorem injective_of_isPartialInv_right {α β} {f : α → β} {g} (H : IsPartialInv f g) (x y b)
(h₁ : b ∈ g x) (h₂ : b ∈ g y) : x = y :=
((H _ _).1 h₁).symm.trans ((H _ _).1 h₂)
theorem LeftInverse.comp_eq_id {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse f g) : f ∘ g = id :=
funext h
theorem leftInverse_iff_comp {f : α → β} {g : β → α} : LeftInverse f g ↔ f ∘ g = id :=
⟨LeftInverse.comp_eq_id, congr_fun⟩
theorem RightInverse.comp_eq_id {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : RightInverse f g) : g ∘ f = id :=
funext h
theorem rightInverse_iff_comp {f : α → β} {g : β → α} : RightInverse f g ↔ g ∘ f = id :=
⟨RightInverse.comp_eq_id, congr_fun⟩
theorem LeftInverse.comp {f : α → β} {g : β → α} {h : β → γ} {i : γ → β} (hf : LeftInverse f g)
(hh : LeftInverse h i) : LeftInverse (h ∘ f) (g ∘ i) :=
fun a ↦ show h (f (g (i a))) = a by rw [hf (i a), hh a]
theorem RightInverse.comp {f : α → β} {g : β → α} {h : β → γ} {i : γ → β} (hf : RightInverse f g)
(hh : RightInverse h i) : RightInverse (h ∘ f) (g ∘ i) :=
LeftInverse.comp hh hf
theorem LeftInverse.rightInverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse g f) : RightInverse f g :=
h
theorem RightInverse.leftInverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : RightInverse g f) : LeftInverse f g :=
h
theorem LeftInverse.surjective {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse f g) : Surjective f :=
h.rightInverse.surjective
theorem RightInverse.injective {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : RightInverse f g) : Injective f :=
h.leftInverse.injective
theorem LeftInverse.rightInverse_of_injective {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse f g)
(hf : Injective f) : RightInverse f g :=
fun x ↦ hf <| h (f x)
theorem LeftInverse.rightInverse_of_surjective {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse f g)
(hg : Surjective g) : RightInverse f g :=
fun x ↦ let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hg x; hy ▸ congr_arg g (h y)
theorem RightInverse.leftInverse_of_surjective {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
RightInverse f g → Surjective f → LeftInverse f g :=
LeftInverse.rightInverse_of_surjective
theorem RightInverse.leftInverse_of_injective {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
RightInverse f g → Injective g → LeftInverse f g :=
LeftInverse.rightInverse_of_injective
theorem LeftInverse.eq_rightInverse {f : α → β} {g₁ g₂ : β → α} (h₁ : LeftInverse g₁ f)
(h₂ : RightInverse g₂ f) : g₁ = g₂ :=
calc
g₁ = g₁ ∘ f ∘ g₂ := by rw [h₂.comp_eq_id, comp_id]
_ = g₂ := by rw [← comp_assoc, h₁.comp_eq_id, id_comp]
/-- We can use choice to construct explicitly a partial inverse for
a given injective function `f`. -/
noncomputable def partialInv {α β} (f : α → β) (b : β) : Option α :=
open scoped Classical in
if h : ∃ a, f a = b then some (Classical.choose h) else none
theorem partialInv_of_injective {α β} {f : α → β} (I : Injective f) : IsPartialInv f (partialInv f)
| a, b =>
⟨fun h =>
open scoped Classical in
have hpi : partialInv f b = if h : ∃ a, f a = b then some (Classical.choose h) else none :=
rfl
if h' : ∃ a, f a = b
then by rw [hpi, dif_pos h'] at h
injection h with h
subst h
apply Classical.choose_spec h'
else by rw [hpi, dif_neg h'] at h; contradiction,
fun e => e ▸ have h : ∃ a', f a' = f a := ⟨_, rfl⟩
(dif_pos h).trans (congr_arg _ (I <| Classical.choose_spec h))⟩
theorem partialInv_left {α β} {f : α → β} (I : Injective f) : ∀ x, partialInv f (f x) = some x :=
isPartialInv_left (partialInv_of_injective I)
end
section InvFun
variable {α β : Sort*} [Nonempty α] {f : α → β} {b : β}
/-- The inverse of a function (which is a left inverse if `f` is injective
and a right inverse if `f` is surjective). -/
-- Explicit Sort so that `α` isn't inferred to be Prop via `exists_prop_decidable`
noncomputable def invFun {α : Sort u} {β} [Nonempty α] (f : α → β) : β → α :=
open scoped Classical in
fun y ↦ if h : (∃ x, f x = y) then h.choose else Classical.arbitrary α
theorem invFun_eq (h : ∃ a, f a = b) : f (invFun f b) = b := by
simp only [invFun, dif_pos h, h.choose_spec]
theorem apply_invFun_apply {α β : Type*} {f : α → β} {a : α} :
f (@invFun _ _ ⟨a⟩ f (f a)) = f a :=
@invFun_eq _ _ ⟨a⟩ _ _ ⟨_, rfl⟩
theorem invFun_neg (h : ¬∃ a, f a = b) : invFun f b = Classical.choice ‹_› :=
dif_neg h
theorem invFun_eq_of_injective_of_rightInverse {g : β → α} (hf : Injective f)
(hg : RightInverse g f) : invFun f = g :=
funext fun b ↦
hf
(by
rw [hg b]
exact invFun_eq ⟨g b, hg b⟩)
theorem rightInverse_invFun (hf : Surjective f) : RightInverse (invFun f) f :=
fun b ↦ invFun_eq <| hf b
theorem leftInverse_invFun (hf : Injective f) : LeftInverse (invFun f) f :=
fun b ↦ hf <| invFun_eq ⟨b, rfl⟩
theorem invFun_surjective (hf : Injective f) : Surjective (invFun f) :=
(leftInverse_invFun hf).surjective
theorem invFun_comp (hf : Injective f) : invFun f ∘ f = id :=
funext <| leftInverse_invFun hf
theorem Injective.hasLeftInverse (hf : Injective f) : HasLeftInverse f :=
⟨invFun f, leftInverse_invFun hf⟩
theorem injective_iff_hasLeftInverse : Injective f ↔ HasLeftInverse f :=
⟨Injective.hasLeftInverse, HasLeftInverse.injective⟩
end InvFun
section SurjInv
variable {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} {γ : Sort w} {f : α → β}
/-- The inverse of a surjective function. (Unlike `invFun`, this does not require
`α` to be inhabited.) -/
noncomputable def surjInv {f : α → β} (h : Surjective f) (b : β) : α :=
Classical.choose (h b)
theorem surjInv_eq (h : Surjective f) (b) : f (surjInv h b) = b :=
Classical.choose_spec (h b)
theorem rightInverse_surjInv (hf : Surjective f) : RightInverse (surjInv hf) f :=
surjInv_eq hf
theorem leftInverse_surjInv (hf : Bijective f) : LeftInverse (surjInv hf.2) f :=
rightInverse_of_injective_of_leftInverse hf.1 (rightInverse_surjInv hf.2)
theorem Surjective.hasRightInverse (hf : Surjective f) : HasRightInverse f :=
⟨_, rightInverse_surjInv hf⟩
theorem surjective_iff_hasRightInverse : Surjective f ↔ HasRightInverse f :=
⟨Surjective.hasRightInverse, HasRightInverse.surjective⟩
theorem bijective_iff_has_inverse : Bijective f ↔ ∃ g, LeftInverse g f ∧ RightInverse g f :=
⟨fun hf ↦ ⟨_, leftInverse_surjInv hf, rightInverse_surjInv hf.2⟩, fun ⟨_, gl, gr⟩ ↦
⟨gl.injective, gr.surjective⟩⟩
theorem injective_surjInv (h : Surjective f) : Injective (surjInv h) :=
(rightInverse_surjInv h).injective
theorem surjective_to_subsingleton [na : Nonempty α] [Subsingleton β] (f : α → β) :
Surjective f :=
fun _ ↦ let ⟨a⟩ := na; ⟨a, Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩
theorem Surjective.piMap {ι : Sort*} {α β : ι → Sort*} {f : ∀ i, α i → β i}
(hf : ∀ i, Surjective (f i)) : Surjective (Pi.map f) := fun g ↦
⟨fun i ↦ surjInv (hf i) (g i), funext fun _ ↦ rightInverse_surjInv _ _⟩
/-- Composition by a surjective function on the left is itself surjective. -/
theorem Surjective.comp_left {g : β → γ} (hg : Surjective g) :
Surjective (g ∘ · : (α → β) → α → γ) :=
.piMap fun _ ↦ hg
theorem surjective_comp_left_iff [Nonempty α] {g : β → γ} :
Surjective (g ∘ · : (α → β) → α → γ) ↔ Surjective g := by
refine ⟨fun h c ↦ Nonempty.elim ‹_› fun a ↦ ?_, (·.comp_left)⟩
have ⟨f, hf⟩ := h fun _ ↦ c
exact ⟨f a, congr_fun hf _⟩
theorem Bijective.piMap {ι : Sort*} {α β : ι → Sort*} {f : ∀ i, α i → β i}
(hf : ∀ i, Bijective (f i)) : Bijective (Pi.map f) :=
⟨.piMap fun i ↦ (hf i).1, .piMap fun i ↦ (hf i).2⟩
/-- Composition by a bijective function on the left is itself bijective. -/
theorem Bijective.comp_left {g : β → γ} (hg : Bijective g) :
Bijective (g ∘ · : (α → β) → α → γ) :=
⟨hg.injective.comp_left, hg.surjective.comp_left⟩
end SurjInv
section Update
variable {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} {α' : Sort w} [DecidableEq α]
{f : (a : α) → β a} {a : α} {b : β a}
/-- Replacing the value of a function at a given point by a given value. -/
def update (f : ∀ a, β a) (a' : α) (v : β a') (a : α) : β a :=
if h : a = a' then Eq.ndrec v h.symm else f a
@[simp]
theorem update_self (a : α) (v : β a) (f : ∀ a, β a) : update f a v a = v :=
dif_pos rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias update_same := update_self
@[simp]
theorem update_of_ne {a a' : α} (h : a ≠ a') (v : β a') (f : ∀ a, β a) : update f a' v a = f a :=
dif_neg h
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias update_noteq := update_of_ne
/-- On non-dependent functions, `Function.update` can be expressed as an `ite` -/
theorem update_apply {β : Sort*} (f : α → β) (a' : α) (b : β) (a : α) :
update f a' b a = if a = a' then b else f a := by
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne a a' with rfl | hne <;> simp [*]
@[nontriviality]
theorem update_eq_const_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (a : α) (v : α') (f : α → α') :
update f a v = const α v :=
funext fun a' ↦ Subsingleton.elim a a' ▸ update_self ..
theorem surjective_eval {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} [h : ∀ a, Nonempty (β a)] (a : α) :
Surjective (eval a : (∀ a, β a) → β a) := fun b ↦
⟨@update _ _ (Classical.decEq α) (fun a ↦ (h a).some) a b,
@update_self _ _ (Classical.decEq α) _ _ _⟩
theorem update_injective (f : ∀ a, β a) (a' : α) : Injective (update f a') := fun v v' h ↦ by
have := congr_fun h a'
rwa [update_self, update_self] at this
lemma forall_update_iff (f : ∀a, β a) {a : α} {b : β a} (p : ∀a, β a → Prop) :
(∀ x, p x (update f a b x)) ↔ p a b ∧ ∀ x, x ≠ a → p x (f x) := by
rw [← and_forall_ne a, update_self]
simp +contextual
theorem exists_update_iff (f : ∀ a, β a) {a : α} {b : β a} (p : ∀ a, β a → Prop) :
(∃ x, p x (update f a b x)) ↔ p a b ∨ ∃ x ≠ a, p x (f x) := by
rw [← not_forall_not, forall_update_iff f fun a b ↦ ¬p a b]
simp [-not_and, not_and_or]
theorem update_eq_iff {a : α} {b : β a} {f g : ∀ a, β a} :
update f a b = g ↔ b = g a ∧ ∀ x ≠ a, f x = g x :=
funext_iff.trans <| forall_update_iff _ fun x y ↦ y = g x
theorem eq_update_iff {a : α} {b : β a} {f g : ∀ a, β a} :
g = update f a b ↔ g a = b ∧ ∀ x ≠ a, g x = f x :=
funext_iff.trans <| forall_update_iff _ fun x y ↦ g x = y
@[simp] lemma update_eq_self_iff : update f a b = f ↔ b = f a := by simp [update_eq_iff]
@[simp] lemma eq_update_self_iff : f = update f a b ↔ f a = b := by simp [eq_update_iff]
lemma ne_update_self_iff : f ≠ update f a b ↔ f a ≠ b := eq_update_self_iff.not
lemma update_ne_self_iff : update f a b ≠ f ↔ b ≠ f a := update_eq_self_iff.not
@[simp]
theorem update_eq_self (a : α) (f : ∀ a, β a) : update f a (f a) = f :=
update_eq_iff.2 ⟨rfl, fun _ _ ↦ rfl⟩
theorem update_comp_eq_of_forall_ne' {α'} (g : ∀ a, β a) {f : α' → α} {i : α} (a : β i)
(h : ∀ x, f x ≠ i) : (fun j ↦ (update g i a) (f j)) = fun j ↦ g (f j) :=
funext fun _ ↦ update_of_ne (h _) _ _
variable [DecidableEq α']
/-- Non-dependent version of `Function.update_comp_eq_of_forall_ne'` -/
theorem update_comp_eq_of_forall_ne {α β : Sort*} (g : α' → β) {f : α → α'} {i : α'} (a : β)
(h : ∀ x, f x ≠ i) : update g i a ∘ f = g ∘ f :=
update_comp_eq_of_forall_ne' g a h
theorem update_comp_eq_of_injective' (g : ∀ a, β a) {f : α' → α} (hf : Function.Injective f)
(i : α') (a : β (f i)) : (fun j ↦ update g (f i) a (f j)) = update (fun i ↦ g (f i)) i a :=
eq_update_iff.2 ⟨update_self .., fun _ hj ↦ update_of_ne (hf.ne hj) _ _⟩
theorem update_apply_of_injective
(g : ∀ a, β a) {f : α' → α} (hf : Function.Injective f)
(i : α') (a : β (f i)) (j : α') :
update g (f i) a (f j) = update (fun i ↦ g (f i)) i a j :=
congr_fun (update_comp_eq_of_injective' g hf i a) j
/-- Non-dependent version of `Function.update_comp_eq_of_injective'` -/
theorem update_comp_eq_of_injective {β : Sort*} (g : α' → β) {f : α → α'}
(hf : Function.Injective f) (i : α) (a : β) :
Function.update g (f i) a ∘ f = Function.update (g ∘ f) i a :=
update_comp_eq_of_injective' g hf i a
/-- Recursors can be pushed inside `Function.update`.
The `ctor` argument should be a one-argument constructor like `Sum.inl`,
and `recursor` should be an inductive recursor partially applied in all but that constructor,
such as `(Sum.rec · g)`.
In future, we should build some automation to generate applications like `Option.rec_update` for all
inductive types. -/
lemma rec_update {ι κ : Sort*} {α : κ → Sort*} [DecidableEq ι] [DecidableEq κ]
{ctor : ι → κ} (hctor : Function.Injective ctor)
(recursor : ((i : ι) → α (ctor i)) → ((i : κ) → α i))
(h : ∀ f i, recursor f (ctor i) = f i)
(h2 : ∀ f₁ f₂ k, (∀ i, ctor i ≠ k) → recursor f₁ k = recursor f₂ k)
(f : (i : ι) → α (ctor i)) (i : ι) (x : α (ctor i)) :
recursor (update f i x) = update (recursor f) (ctor i) x := by
ext k
by_cases h : ∃ i, ctor i = k
· obtain ⟨i', rfl⟩ := h
obtain rfl | hi := eq_or_ne i' i
· simp [h]
· have hk := hctor.ne hi
simp [h, hi, hk, Function.update_of_ne]
· rw [not_exists] at h
rw [h2 _ f _ h]
rw [Function.update_of_ne (Ne.symm <| h i)]
@[simp]
lemma _root_.Option.rec_update {α : Type*} {β : Option α → Sort*} [DecidableEq α]
(f : β none) (g : ∀ a, β (.some a)) (a : α) (x : β (.some a)) :
Option.rec f (update g a x) = update (Option.rec f g) (.some a) x :=
Function.rec_update (@Option.some.inj _) (Option.rec f) (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun
| _, _, .some _, h => (h _ rfl).elim
| _, _, .none, _ => rfl) _ _ _
theorem apply_update {ι : Sort*} [DecidableEq ι] {α β : ι → Sort*} (f : ∀ i, α i → β i)
(g : ∀ i, α i) (i : ι) (v : α i) (j : ι) :
f j (update g i v j) = update (fun k ↦ f k (g k)) i (f i v) j := by
by_cases h : j = i
· subst j
simp
· simp [h]
theorem apply_update₂ {ι : Sort*} [DecidableEq ι] {α β γ : ι → Sort*} (f : ∀ i, α i → β i → γ i)
(g : ∀ i, α i) (h : ∀ i, β i) (i : ι) (v : α i) (w : β i) (j : ι) :
f j (update g i v j) (update h i w j) = update (fun k ↦ f k (g k) (h k)) i (f i v w) j := by
by_cases h : j = i
· subst j
simp
· simp [h]
theorem pred_update (P : ∀ ⦃a⦄, β a → Prop) (f : ∀ a, β a) (a' : α) (v : β a') (a : α) :
P (update f a' v a) ↔ a = a' ∧ P v ∨ a ≠ a' ∧ P (f a) := by
rw [apply_update P, update_apply, ite_prop_iff_or]
theorem comp_update {α' : Sort*} {β : Sort*} (f : α' → β) (g : α → α') (i : α) (v : α') :
f ∘ update g i v = update (f ∘ g) i (f v) :=
funext <| apply_update _ _ _ _
theorem update_comm {α} [DecidableEq α] {β : α → Sort*} {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) (v : β a) (w : β b)
(f : ∀ a, β a) : update (update f a v) b w = update (update f b w) a v := by
funext c
simp only [update]
by_cases h₁ : c = b <;> by_cases h₂ : c = a
· rw [dif_pos h₁, dif_pos h₂]
cases h (h₂.symm.trans h₁)
· rw [dif_pos h₁, dif_pos h₁, dif_neg h₂]
· rw [dif_neg h₁, dif_neg h₁]
· rw [dif_neg h₁, dif_neg h₁]
@[simp]
theorem update_idem {α} [DecidableEq α] {β : α → Sort*} {a : α} (v w : β a) (f : ∀ a, β a) :
update (update f a v) a w = update f a w := by
funext b
by_cases h : b = a <;> simp [update, h]
end Update
noncomputable section Extend
variable {α β γ : Sort*} {f : α → β}
/-- Extension of a function `g : α → γ` along a function `f : α → β`.
For every `a : α`, `f a` is sent to `g a`. `f` might not be surjective, so we use an auxiliary
function `j : β → γ` by sending `b : β` not in the range of `f` to `j b`. If you do not care about
the behavior outside the range, `j` can be used as a junk value by setting it to be `0` or
`Classical.arbitrary` (assuming `γ` is nonempty).
This definition is mathematically meaningful only when `f a₁ = f a₂ → g a₁ = g a₂` (spelled
`g.FactorsThrough f`). In particular this holds if `f` is injective.
A typical use case is extending a function from a subtype to the entire type. If you wish to extend
`g : {b : β // p b} → γ` to a function `β → γ`, you should use `Function.extend Subtype.val g j`. -/
def extend (f : α → β) (g : α → γ) (j : β → γ) : β → γ := fun b ↦
open scoped Classical in
if h : ∃ a, f a = b then g (Classical.choose h) else j b
|
/-- g factors through f : `f a = f b → g a = g b` -/
def FactorsThrough (g : α → γ) (f : α → β) : Prop :=
| Mathlib/Logic/Function/Basic.lean | 669 | 671 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Reid Barton. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions
/-!
# Neighborhoods and continuity relative to a subset
This file develops API on the relative versions
* `nhdsWithin` of `nhds`
* `ContinuousOn` of `Continuous`
* `ContinuousWithinAt` of `ContinuousAt`
related to continuity, which are defined in previous definition files.
Their basic properties studied in this file include the relationships between
these restricted notions and the corresponding notions for the subtype
equipped with the subspace topology.
## Notation
* `𝓝 x`: the filter of neighborhoods of a point `x`;
* `𝓟 s`: the principal filter of a set `s`;
* `𝓝[s] x`: the filter `nhdsWithin x s` of neighborhoods of a point `x` within a set `s`.
-/
open Set Filter Function Topology Filter
variable {α β γ δ : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace α]
/-!
## Properties of the neighborhood-within filter
-/
@[simp]
theorem nhds_bind_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : ((𝓝 a).bind fun x => 𝓝[s] x) = 𝓝[s] a :=
bind_inf_principal.trans <| congr_arg₂ _ nhds_bind_nhds rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 a, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] y, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x :=
Filter.ext_iff.1 nhds_bind_nhdsWithin { x | p x }
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ∈ s → p x :=
eventually_inf_principal
theorem frequently_nhdsWithin_iff {z : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] z, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝 z, p x ∧ x ∈ s :=
frequently_inf_principal.trans <| by simp only [and_comm]
theorem mem_closure_ne_iff_frequently_within {z : α} {s : Set α} :
z ∈ closure (s \ {z}) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[≠] z, x ∈ s := by
simp [mem_closure_iff_frequently, frequently_nhdsWithin_iff]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_eventually_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] a, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] y, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => (eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin.2 h).filter_mono inf_le_left⟩
simp only [eventually_nhdsWithin_iff] at h ⊢
exact h.mono fun x hx hxs => (hx hxs).self_of_nhds hxs
@[simp]
theorem eventually_mem_nhdsWithin_iff {x : α} {s t : Set α} :
(∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝[s] x, t ∈ 𝓝[s] x') ↔ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
eventually_eventually_nhdsWithin
theorem nhdsWithin_eq (a : α) (s : Set α) :
𝓝[s] a = ⨅ t ∈ { t : Set α | a ∈ t ∧ IsOpen t }, 𝓟 (t ∩ s) :=
((nhds_basis_opens a).inf_principal s).eq_biInf
@[simp] lemma nhdsWithin_univ (a : α) : 𝓝[Set.univ] a = 𝓝 a := by
rw [nhdsWithin, principal_univ, inf_top_eq]
theorem nhdsWithin_hasBasis {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} {a : α}
(h : (𝓝 a).HasBasis p s) (t : Set α) : (𝓝[t] a).HasBasis p fun i => s i ∩ t :=
h.inf_principal t
theorem nhdsWithin_basis_open (a : α) (t : Set α) :
(𝓝[t] a).HasBasis (fun u => a ∈ u ∧ IsOpen u) fun u => u ∩ t :=
nhdsWithin_hasBasis (nhds_basis_opens a) t
theorem mem_nhdsWithin {t : Set α} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] a ↔ ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ a ∈ u ∧ u ∩ s ⊆ t := by
simpa only [and_assoc, and_left_comm] using (nhdsWithin_basis_open a s).mem_iff
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter {t : Set α} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] a ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 a, u ∩ s ⊆ t :=
(nhdsWithin_hasBasis (𝓝 a).basis_sets s).mem_iff
theorem diff_mem_nhdsWithin_compl {x : α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x :=
diff_mem_inf_principal_compl hs t
theorem diff_mem_nhdsWithin_diff {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x) (t' : Set α) :
s \ t' ∈ 𝓝[t \ t'] x := by
rw [nhdsWithin, diff_eq, diff_eq, ← inf_principal, ← inf_assoc]
exact inter_mem_inf hs (mem_principal_self _)
theorem nhds_of_nhdsWithin_of_nhds {s t : Set α} {a : α} (h1 : s ∈ 𝓝 a) (h2 : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
t ∈ 𝓝 a := by
rcases mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.mp h2 with ⟨_, Hw, hw⟩
exact (𝓝 a).sets_of_superset ((𝓝 a).inter_sets Hw h1) hw
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually {s t : Set α} {x : α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] x ↔ ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, y ∈ s → y ∈ t :=
eventually_inf_principal
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventuallyEq {s t : Set α} {x : α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] x ↔ s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] (s ∩ t : Set α) := by
simp_rw [mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually, eventuallyEq_set, mem_inter_iff, iff_self_and]
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq {s t : Set α} {x : α} : 𝓝[s] x = 𝓝[t] x ↔ s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t :=
set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal.symm
theorem nhdsWithin_le_iff {s t : Set α} {x : α} : 𝓝[s] x ≤ 𝓝[t] x ↔ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le.symm.trans set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal
theorem preimage_nhdsWithin_coinduced' {π : α → β} {s : Set β} {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ t)
(hs : s ∈ @nhds β (.coinduced (fun x : t => π x) inferInstance) (π a)) :
π ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝[t] a := by
lift a to t using h
replace hs : (fun x : t => π x) ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝 a := preimage_nhds_coinduced hs
rwa [← map_nhds_subtype_val, mem_map]
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds {s t : Set α} {a : α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝 a) : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a :=
mem_inf_of_left h
theorem self_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ 𝓝[s] a :=
mem_inf_of_right (mem_principal_self s)
theorem eventually_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, x ∈ s :=
self_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem inter_mem_nhdsWithin (s : Set α) {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝 a) : s ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[s] a :=
inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin (mem_inf_of_left h)
theorem pure_le_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} (ha : a ∈ s) : pure a ≤ 𝓝[s] a :=
le_inf (pure_le_nhds a) (le_principal_iff.2 ha)
theorem mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s t : Set α} (ha : a ∈ s) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) : a ∈ t :=
pure_le_nhdsWithin ha ht
theorem Filter.Eventually.self_of_nhdsWithin {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} {x : α}
(h : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] x, p y) (hx : x ∈ s) : p x :=
mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin hx h
theorem tendsto_const_nhdsWithin {l : Filter β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (ha : a ∈ s) :
Tendsto (fun _ : β => a) l (𝓝[s] a) :=
tendsto_const_pure.mono_right <| pure_le_nhdsWithin ha
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict'' {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left (le_principal_iff.mpr (inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin h)))
(inf_le_inf_left _ (principal_mono.mpr Set.inter_subset_left))
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict' {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝 a) : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
nhdsWithin_restrict'' s <| mem_inf_of_left h
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h₀ : a ∈ t) (h₁ : IsOpen t) :
𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
nhdsWithin_restrict' s (IsOpen.mem_nhds h₁ h₀)
theorem nhdsWithin_le_of_mem {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a) : 𝓝[t] a ≤ 𝓝[s] a :=
nhdsWithin_le_iff.mpr h
theorem nhdsWithin_le_nhds {a : α} {s : Set α} : 𝓝[s] a ≤ 𝓝 a := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ]
apply nhdsWithin_le_of_mem
exact univ_mem
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin' {a : α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 a) (h₂ : t ∩ s = u ∩ s) :
𝓝[t] a = 𝓝[u] a := by rw [nhdsWithin_restrict' t hs, nhdsWithin_restrict' u hs, h₂]
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s t u : Set α} (h₀ : a ∈ s) (h₁ : IsOpen s)
(h₂ : t ∩ s = u ∩ s) : 𝓝[t] a = 𝓝[u] a := by
rw [nhdsWithin_restrict t h₀ h₁, nhdsWithin_restrict u h₀ h₁, h₂]
@[simp] theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhds {a : α} {s : Set α} : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝 a ↔ s ∈ 𝓝 a :=
inf_eq_left.trans le_principal_iff
theorem IsOpen.nhdsWithin_eq {a : α} {s : Set α} (h : IsOpen s) (ha : a ∈ s) : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝 a :=
nhdsWithin_eq_nhds.2 <| h.mem_nhds ha
theorem preimage_nhds_within_coinduced {π : α → β} {s : Set β} {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ t)
(ht : IsOpen t)
(hs : s ∈ @nhds β (.coinduced (fun x : t => π x) inferInstance) (π a)) :
π ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝 a := by
rw [← ht.nhdsWithin_eq h]
exact preimage_nhdsWithin_coinduced' h hs
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_empty (a : α) : 𝓝[∅] a = ⊥ := by rw [nhdsWithin, principal_empty, inf_bot_eq]
theorem nhdsWithin_union (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∪ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊔ 𝓝[t] a := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [← inf_sup_left, sup_principal]
theorem nhds_eq_nhdsWithin_sup_nhdsWithin (b : α) {I₁ I₂ : Set α} (hI : Set.univ = I₁ ∪ I₂) :
nhds b = nhdsWithin b I₁ ⊔ nhdsWithin b I₂ := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ b, hI, nhdsWithin_union]
/-- If `L` and `R` are neighborhoods of `b` within sets whose union is `Set.univ`, then
`L ∪ R` is a neighborhood of `b`. -/
theorem union_mem_nhds_of_mem_nhdsWithin {b : α}
{I₁ I₂ : Set α} (h : Set.univ = I₁ ∪ I₂)
{L : Set α} (hL : L ∈ nhdsWithin b I₁)
{R : Set α} (hR : R ∈ nhdsWithin b I₂) : L ∪ R ∈ nhds b := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ b, h, nhdsWithin_union]
exact ⟨mem_of_superset hL (by simp), mem_of_superset hR (by simp)⟩
/-- Writing a punctured neighborhood filter as a sup of left and right filters. -/
lemma punctured_nhds_eq_nhdsWithin_sup_nhdsWithin [LinearOrder α] {x : α} :
𝓝[≠] x = 𝓝[<] x ⊔ 𝓝[>] x := by
rw [← Iio_union_Ioi, nhdsWithin_union]
/-- Obtain a "predictably-sided" neighborhood of `b` from two one-sided neighborhoods. -/
theorem nhds_of_Ici_Iic [LinearOrder α] {b : α}
{L : Set α} (hL : L ∈ 𝓝[≤] b)
{R : Set α} (hR : R ∈ 𝓝[≥] b) : L ∩ Iic b ∪ R ∩ Ici b ∈ 𝓝 b :=
union_mem_nhds_of_mem_nhdsWithin Iic_union_Ici.symm
(inter_mem hL self_mem_nhdsWithin) (inter_mem hR self_mem_nhdsWithin)
theorem nhdsWithin_biUnion {ι} {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) (s : ι → Set α) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃ i ∈ I, s i] a = ⨆ i ∈ I, 𝓝[s i] a := by
induction I, hI using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert _ _ hT => simp only [hT, nhdsWithin_union, iSup_insert, biUnion_insert]
theorem nhdsWithin_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hS : S.Finite) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃₀ S] a = ⨆ s ∈ S, 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, nhdsWithin_biUnion hS]
theorem nhdsWithin_iUnion {ι} [Finite ι] (s : ι → Set α) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃ i, s i] a = ⨆ i, 𝓝[s i] a := by
rw [← sUnion_range, nhdsWithin_sUnion (finite_range s), iSup_range]
theorem nhdsWithin_inter (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊓ 𝓝[t] a := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [inf_left_comm, inf_assoc, inf_principal, ← inf_assoc, inf_idem]
theorem nhdsWithin_inter' (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊓ 𝓟 t := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [← inf_principal, inf_assoc]
theorem nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[t] a := by
rw [nhdsWithin_inter, inf_eq_right]
exact nhdsWithin_le_of_mem h
theorem nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem' {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [inter_comm, nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem h]
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_singleton (a : α) : 𝓝[{a}] a = pure a := by
rw [nhdsWithin, principal_singleton, inf_eq_right.2 (pure_le_nhds a)]
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) : 𝓝[insert a s] a = pure a ⊔ 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [← singleton_union, nhdsWithin_union, nhdsWithin_singleton]
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_insert {a : α} {s t : Set α} : t ∈ 𝓝[insert a s] a ↔ a ∈ t ∧ t ∈ 𝓝[s] a := by
simp
theorem insert_mem_nhdsWithin_insert {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
insert a t ∈ 𝓝[insert a s] a := by simp [mem_of_superset h]
theorem insert_mem_nhds_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} : insert a s ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ s ∈ 𝓝[≠] a := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, mem_inf_principal, mem_compl_iff, mem_singleton_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left,
insert_def]
@[simp]
theorem nhdsNE_sup_pure (a : α) : 𝓝[≠] a ⊔ pure a = 𝓝 a := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_singleton, ← nhdsWithin_union, compl_union_self, nhdsWithin_univ]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-02")]
alias nhdsWithin_compl_singleton_sup_pure := nhdsNE_sup_pure
@[simp]
theorem pure_sup_nhdsNE (a : α) : pure a ⊔ 𝓝[≠] a = 𝓝 a := by rw [← sup_comm, nhdsNE_sup_pure]
theorem nhdsWithin_prod [TopologicalSpace β]
{s u : Set α} {t v : Set β} {a : α} {b : β} (hu : u ∈ 𝓝[s] a) (hv : v ∈ 𝓝[t] b) :
u ×ˢ v ∈ 𝓝[s ×ˢ t] (a, b) := by
rw [nhdsWithin_prod_eq]
exact prod_mem_prod hu hv
lemma Filter.EventuallyEq.mem_interior {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hst : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t)
(h : x ∈ interior s) : x ∈ interior t := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq] at hst
simpa [mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, ← nhdsWithin_eq_nhds, hst] using h
lemma Filter.EventuallyEq.mem_interior_iff {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hst : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
x ∈ interior s ↔ x ∈ interior t :=
⟨fun h ↦ hst.mem_interior h, fun h ↦ hst.symm.mem_interior h⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-11")]
alias EventuallyEq.mem_interior_iff := Filter.EventuallyEq.mem_interior_iff
section Pi
variable {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)]
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_eq' {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) (s : ∀ i, Set (π i)) (x : ∀ i, π i) :
𝓝[pi I s] x = ⨅ i, comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝 (x i) ⊓ ⨅ (_ : i ∈ I), 𝓟 (s i)) := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_pi, Filter.pi, comap_inf, comap_iInf, pi_def, comap_principal, ←
iInf_principal_finite hI, ← iInf_inf_eq]
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_eq {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) (s : ∀ i, Set (π i)) (x : ∀ i, π i) :
𝓝[pi I s] x =
(⨅ i ∈ I, comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝[s i] x i)) ⊓
⨅ (i) (_ : i ∉ I), comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝 (x i)) := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_pi, Filter.pi, pi_def, ← iInf_principal_finite hI, comap_inf,
comap_principal, eval]
rw [iInf_split _ fun i => i ∈ I, inf_right_comm]
simp only [iInf_inf_eq]
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_univ_eq [Finite ι] (s : ∀ i, Set (π i)) (x : ∀ i, π i) :
𝓝[pi univ s] x = ⨅ i, comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝[s i] x i) := by
simpa [nhdsWithin] using nhdsWithin_pi_eq finite_univ s x
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_eq_bot {I : Set ι} {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} {x : ∀ i, π i} :
𝓝[pi I s] x = ⊥ ↔ ∃ i ∈ I, 𝓝[s i] x i = ⊥ := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_pi, pi_inf_principal_pi_eq_bot]
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_neBot {I : Set ι} {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} {x : ∀ i, π i} :
(𝓝[pi I s] x).NeBot ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, (𝓝[s i] x i).NeBot := by
simp [neBot_iff, nhdsWithin_pi_eq_bot]
instance instNeBotNhdsWithinUnivPi {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} {x : ∀ i, π i}
[∀ i, (𝓝[s i] x i).NeBot] : (𝓝[pi univ s] x).NeBot := by
simpa [nhdsWithin_pi_neBot]
instance Pi.instNeBotNhdsWithinIio [Nonempty ι] [∀ i, Preorder (π i)] {x : ∀ i, π i}
[∀ i, (𝓝[<] x i).NeBot] : (𝓝[<] x).NeBot :=
have : (𝓝[pi univ fun i ↦ Iio (x i)] x).NeBot := inferInstance
this.mono <| nhdsWithin_mono _ fun _y hy ↦ lt_of_strongLT fun i ↦ hy i trivial
instance Pi.instNeBotNhdsWithinIoi [Nonempty ι] [∀ i, Preorder (π i)] {x : ∀ i, π i}
[∀ i, (𝓝[>] x i).NeBot] : (𝓝[>] x).NeBot :=
Pi.instNeBotNhdsWithinIio (π := fun i ↦ (π i)ᵒᵈ) (x := fun i ↦ OrderDual.toDual (x i))
end Pi
theorem Filter.Tendsto.piecewise_nhdsWithin {f g : α → β} {t : Set α} [∀ x, Decidable (x ∈ t)]
{a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β} (h₀ : Tendsto f (𝓝[s ∩ t] a) l)
(h₁ : Tendsto g (𝓝[s ∩ tᶜ] a) l) : Tendsto (piecewise t f g) (𝓝[s] a) l := by
apply Tendsto.piecewise <;> rwa [← nhdsWithin_inter']
theorem Filter.Tendsto.if_nhdsWithin {f g : α → β} {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {a : α}
{s : Set α} {l : Filter β} (h₀ : Tendsto f (𝓝[s ∩ { x | p x }] a) l)
(h₁ : Tendsto g (𝓝[s ∩ { x | ¬p x }] a) l) :
Tendsto (fun x => if p x then f x else g x) (𝓝[s] a) l :=
h₀.piecewise_nhdsWithin h₁
theorem map_nhdsWithin (f : α → β) (a : α) (s : Set α) :
map f (𝓝[s] a) = ⨅ t ∈ { t : Set α | a ∈ t ∧ IsOpen t }, 𝓟 (f '' (t ∩ s)) :=
((nhdsWithin_basis_open a s).map f).eq_biInf
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_mono_left {f : α → β} {a : α} {s t : Set α} {l : Filter β} (hst : s ⊆ t)
(h : Tendsto f (𝓝[t] a) l) : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l :=
h.mono_left <| nhdsWithin_mono a hst
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_mono_right {f : β → α} {l : Filter β} {a : α} {s t : Set α} (hst : s ⊆ t)
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a)) : Tendsto f l (𝓝[t] a) :=
h.mono_right (nhdsWithin_mono a hst)
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β}
(h : Tendsto f (𝓝 a) l) : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l :=
h.mono_left inf_le_left
theorem eventually_mem_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin {f : β → α} {a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a)) : ∀ᶠ i in l, f i ∈ s := by
simp_rw [nhdsWithin_eq, tendsto_iInf, mem_setOf_eq, tendsto_principal, mem_inter_iff,
eventually_and] at h
exact (h univ ⟨mem_univ a, isOpen_univ⟩).2
theorem tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin {f : β → α} {a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a)) : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) :=
h.mono_right nhdsWithin_le_nhds
theorem nhdsWithin_neBot_of_mem {s : Set α} {x : α} (hx : x ∈ s) : NeBot (𝓝[s] x) :=
mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot.1 <| subset_closure hx
theorem IsClosed.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot {s : Set α} (hs : IsClosed s) {x : α}
(hx : NeBot <| 𝓝[s] x) : x ∈ s :=
hs.closure_eq ▸ mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot.2 hx
theorem DenseRange.nhdsWithin_neBot {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α} (h : DenseRange f) (x : α) :
NeBot (𝓝[range f] x) :=
mem_closure_iff_clusterPt.1 (h x)
theorem mem_closure_pi {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] {I : Set ι}
{s : ∀ i, Set (α i)} {x : ∀ i, α i} : x ∈ closure (pi I s) ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, x i ∈ closure (s i) := by
simp only [mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot, nhdsWithin_pi_neBot]
theorem closure_pi_set {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] (I : Set ι)
(s : ∀ i, Set (α i)) : closure (pi I s) = pi I fun i => closure (s i) :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_closure_pi
theorem dense_pi {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] {s : ∀ i, Set (α i)}
(I : Set ι) (hs : ∀ i ∈ I, Dense (s i)) : Dense (pi I s) := by
simp only [dense_iff_closure_eq, closure_pi_set, pi_congr rfl fun i hi => (hs i hi).closure_eq,
pi_univ]
theorem DenseRange.piMap {ι : Type*} {X Y : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
{f : (i : ι) → (X i) → (Y i)} (hf : ∀ i, DenseRange (f i)):
DenseRange (Pi.map f) := by
rw [DenseRange, Set.range_piMap]
exact dense_pi Set.univ (fun i _ => hf i)
theorem eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_iff {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} :
f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
mem_inf_principal
/-- Two functions agree on a neighborhood of `x` if they agree at `x` and in a punctured
neighborhood. -/
theorem eventuallyEq_nhds_of_eventuallyEq_nhdsNE {f g : α → β} {a : α} (h₁ : f =ᶠ[𝓝[≠] a] g)
(h₂ : f a = g a) :
f =ᶠ[𝓝 a] g := by
filter_upwards [eventually_nhdsWithin_iff.1 h₁]
intro x hx
by_cases h₂x : x = a
· simp [h₂x, h₂]
· tauto
theorem eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_of_eqOn {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g :=
mem_inf_of_right h
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g :=
eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_of_eqOn h
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} {l : Filter β}
(hfg : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = g x) (hf : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l) : Tendsto g (𝓝[s] a) l :=
(tendsto_congr' <| eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_of_eqOn hfg).1 hf
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_of_forall {s : Set α} {a : α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) :
∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x :=
mem_inf_of_right h
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within {a : α} {l : Filter β} {s : Set α}
(f : β → α) (h1 : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) (h2 : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ∈ s) : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨h1, tendsto_principal.2 h2⟩
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff {a : α} {l : Filter β} {s : Set α} {f : β → α} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a) ↔ Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) ∧ ∀ᶠ n in l, f n ∈ s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin h, eventually_mem_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin h⟩, fun h =>
tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within _ h.1 h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_range {a : α} {l : Filter β} {f : β → α} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝[range f] a) ↔ Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) :=
⟨fun h => h.mono_right inf_le_left, fun h =>
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨h, tendsto_principal.2 <| Eventually.of_forall mem_range_self⟩⟩
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.eq_of_nhdsWithin {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} {a : α} (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g)
(hmem : a ∈ s) : f a = g a :=
h.self_of_nhdsWithin hmem
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_of_eventually_nhds {s : Set α}
{a : α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x :=
mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds h
lemma Set.MapsTo.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {x : α}
(hst : MapsTo f s t) : f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
Filter.mem_of_superset self_mem_nhdsWithin hst
/-!
### `nhdsWithin` and subtypes
-/
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_subtype {s : Set α} {a : { x // x ∈ s }} {t u : Set { x // x ∈ s }} :
t ∈ 𝓝[u] a ↔ t ∈ comap ((↑) : s → α) (𝓝[(↑) '' u] a) := by
rw [nhdsWithin, nhds_subtype, principal_subtype, ← comap_inf, ← nhdsWithin]
theorem nhdsWithin_subtype (s : Set α) (a : { x // x ∈ s }) (t : Set { x // x ∈ s }) :
𝓝[t] a = comap ((↑) : s → α) (𝓝[(↑) '' t] a) :=
Filter.ext fun _ => mem_nhdsWithin_subtype
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_map_subtype_coe {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) :
𝓝[s] a = map ((↑) : s → α) (𝓝 ⟨a, h⟩) :=
(map_nhds_subtype_val ⟨a, h⟩).symm
theorem mem_nhds_subtype_iff_nhdsWithin {s : Set α} {a : s} {t : Set s} :
t ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ (↑) '' t ∈ 𝓝[s] (a : α) := by
rw [← map_nhds_subtype_val, image_mem_map_iff Subtype.val_injective]
theorem preimage_coe_mem_nhds_subtype {s t : Set α} {a : s} : (↑) ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ t ∈ 𝓝[s] ↑a := by
rw [← map_nhds_subtype_val, mem_map]
theorem eventually_nhds_subtype_iff (s : Set α) (a : s) (P : α → Prop) :
(∀ᶠ x : s in 𝓝 a, P x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, P x :=
preimage_coe_mem_nhds_subtype
theorem frequently_nhds_subtype_iff (s : Set α) (a : s) (P : α → Prop) :
(∃ᶠ x : s in 𝓝 a, P x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, P x :=
eventually_nhds_subtype_iff s a (¬ P ·) |>.not
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff_subtype {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) (f : α → β) (l : Filter β) :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l ↔ Tendsto (s.restrict f) (𝓝 ⟨a, h⟩) l := by
rw [nhdsWithin_eq_map_subtype_coe h, tendsto_map'_iff]; rfl
/-!
## Local continuity properties of functions
-/
variable [TopologicalSpace β] [TopologicalSpace γ] [TopologicalSpace δ]
{f g : α → β} {s s' s₁ t : Set α} {x : α}
/-!
### `ContinuousWithinAt`
-/
/-- If a function is continuous within `s` at `x`, then it tends to `f x` within `s` by definition.
We register this fact for use with the dot notation, especially to use `Filter.Tendsto.comp` as
`ContinuousWithinAt.comp` will have a different meaning. -/
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝 (f x)) :=
h
theorem continuousWithinAt_univ (f : α → β) (x : α) :
ContinuousWithinAt f Set.univ x ↔ ContinuousAt f x := by
rw [ContinuousAt, ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_univ]
theorem continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ {f : α → β} : Continuous f ↔ ContinuousOn f univ := by
simp [continuous_iff_continuousAt, ContinuousOn, ContinuousAt, ContinuousWithinAt,
nhdsWithin_univ]
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt_restrict (f : α → β) {x : α} {s : Set α} (h : x ∈ s) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousAt (s.restrict f) ⟨x, h⟩ :=
tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff_subtype h f _
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin {t : Set β}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (ht : MapsTo f s t) :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝[t] f x) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨h, tendsto_principal.2 <| mem_inf_of_right <| mem_principal.2 <| ht⟩
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin_image (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝[f '' s] f x) :=
h.tendsto_nhdsWithin (mapsTo_image _ _)
theorem nhdsWithin_le_comap (ctsf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
𝓝[s] x ≤ comap f (𝓝[f '' s] f x) :=
ctsf.tendsto_nhdsWithin_image.le_comap
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin {t : Set β}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 (f x)) : f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
h ht
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin' {t : Set β}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[f '' s] f x) : f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
h.tendsto_nhdsWithin (mapsTo_image _ _) ht
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin'' {y : β} {s t : Set β}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f (f ⁻¹' s) x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] y) (hxy : y = f x) :
f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[f ⁻¹' s] x := by
rw [hxy] at ht
exact h.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin' (nhdsWithin_mono _ (image_preimage_subset f s) ht)
theorem continuousWithinAt_of_not_mem_closure (hx : x ∉ closure s) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x := by
rw [mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot, not_neBot] at hx
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, hx]
exact tendsto_bot
/-!
### `ContinuousOn`
-/
theorem continuousOn_iff :
ContinuousOn f s ↔
∀ x ∈ s, ∀ t : Set β, IsOpen t → f x ∈ t → ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ x ∈ u ∧ u ∩ s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t := by
simp only [ContinuousOn, ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhds, mem_nhdsWithin]
theorem ContinuousOn.continuousWithinAt (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
hf x hx
theorem continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ Continuous (s.restrict f) := by
rw [ContinuousOn, continuous_iff_continuousAt]; constructor
· rintro h ⟨x, xs⟩
exact (continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt_restrict f xs).mp (h x xs)
intro h x xs
exact (continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt_restrict f xs).mpr (h ⟨x, xs⟩)
alias ⟨ContinuousOn.restrict, _⟩ := continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict
theorem ContinuousOn.restrict_mapsTo {t : Set β} (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (ht : MapsTo f s t) :
Continuous (ht.restrict f s t) :=
hf.restrict.codRestrict _
theorem continuousOn_iff' :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ t : Set β, IsOpen t → ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s := by
have : ∀ t, IsOpen (s.restrict f ⁻¹' t) ↔ ∃ u : Set α, IsOpen u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s := by
intro t
rw [isOpen_induced_iff, Set.restrict_eq, Set.preimage_comp]
simp only [Subtype.preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff]
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨u, ou, useq⟩
exact ⟨u, ou, by simpa only [Set.inter_comm, eq_comm] using useq⟩
rw [continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict, continuous_def]; simp only [this]
/-- If a function is continuous on a set for some topologies, then it is
continuous on the same set with respect to any finer topology on the source space. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.mono_dom {α β : Type*} {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₃ : TopologicalSpace β}
(h₁ : t₂ ≤ t₁) {s : Set α} {f : α → β} (h₂ : @ContinuousOn α β t₁ t₃ f s) :
@ContinuousOn α β t₂ t₃ f s := fun x hx _u hu =>
map_mono (inf_le_inf_right _ <| nhds_mono h₁) (h₂ x hx hu)
/-- If a function is continuous on a set for some topologies, then it is
continuous on the same set with respect to any coarser topology on the target space. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.mono_rng {α β : Type*} {t₁ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₂ t₃ : TopologicalSpace β}
(h₁ : t₂ ≤ t₃) {s : Set α} {f : α → β} (h₂ : @ContinuousOn α β t₁ t₂ f s) :
@ContinuousOn α β t₁ t₃ f s := fun x hx _u hu =>
h₂ x hx <| nhds_mono h₁ hu
theorem continuousOn_iff_isClosed :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ t : Set β, IsClosed t → ∃ u, IsClosed u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s := by
have : ∀ t, IsClosed (s.restrict f ⁻¹' t) ↔ ∃ u : Set α, IsClosed u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s := by
intro t
rw [isClosed_induced_iff, Set.restrict_eq, Set.preimage_comp]
simp only [Subtype.preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff, eq_comm, Set.inter_comm s]
rw [continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict, continuous_iff_isClosed]; simp only [this]
theorem continuous_of_cover_nhds {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set α}
(hs : ∀ x : α, ∃ i, s i ∈ 𝓝 x) (hf : ∀ i, ContinuousOn f (s i)) :
Continuous f :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.mpr fun x ↦ let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hs x; by
rw [ContinuousAt, ← nhdsWithin_eq_nhds.2 hi]
exact hf _ _ (mem_of_mem_nhds hi)
@[simp] theorem continuousOn_empty (f : α → β) : ContinuousOn f ∅ := fun _ => False.elim
@[simp]
theorem continuousOn_singleton (f : α → β) (a : α) : ContinuousOn f {a} :=
forall_eq.2 <| by
simpa only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_singleton, tendsto_pure_left] using fun s =>
mem_of_mem_nhds
theorem Set.Subsingleton.continuousOn {s : Set α} (hs : s.Subsingleton) (f : α → β) :
ContinuousOn f s :=
hs.induction_on (continuousOn_empty f) (continuousOn_singleton f)
theorem continuousOn_open_iff (hs : IsOpen s) :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ t, IsOpen t → IsOpen (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) := by
rw [continuousOn_iff']
constructor
· intro h t ht
rcases h t ht with ⟨u, u_open, hu⟩
rw [inter_comm, hu]
apply IsOpen.inter u_open hs
· intro h t ht
refine ⟨s ∩ f ⁻¹' t, h t ht, ?_⟩
rw [@inter_comm _ s (f ⁻¹' t), inter_assoc, inter_self]
theorem ContinuousOn.isOpen_inter_preimage {t : Set β}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hs : IsOpen s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsOpen (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) :=
(continuousOn_open_iff hs).1 hf t ht
theorem ContinuousOn.isOpen_preimage {t : Set β} (h : ContinuousOn f s)
(hs : IsOpen s) (hp : f ⁻¹' t ⊆ s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsOpen (f ⁻¹' t) := by
convert (continuousOn_open_iff hs).mp h t ht
rw [inter_comm, inter_eq_self_of_subset_left hp]
theorem ContinuousOn.preimage_isClosed_of_isClosed {t : Set β}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hs : IsClosed s) (ht : IsClosed t) : IsClosed (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) := by
rcases continuousOn_iff_isClosed.1 hf t ht with ⟨u, hu⟩
rw [inter_comm, hu.2]
apply IsClosed.inter hu.1 hs
theorem ContinuousOn.preimage_interior_subset_interior_preimage {t : Set β}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hs : IsOpen s) : s ∩ f ⁻¹' interior t ⊆ s ∩ interior (f ⁻¹' t) :=
calc
s ∩ f ⁻¹' interior t ⊆ interior (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) :=
interior_maximal (inter_subset_inter (Subset.refl _) (preimage_mono interior_subset))
(hf.isOpen_inter_preimage hs isOpen_interior)
_ = s ∩ interior (f ⁻¹' t) := by rw [interior_inter, hs.interior_eq]
theorem continuousOn_of_locally_continuousOn
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t, IsOpen t ∧ x ∈ t ∧ ContinuousOn f (s ∩ t)) : ContinuousOn f s := by
intro x xs
rcases h x xs with ⟨t, open_t, xt, ct⟩
have := ct x ⟨xs, xt⟩
rwa [ContinuousWithinAt, ← nhdsWithin_restrict _ xt open_t] at this
theorem continuousOn_to_generateFrom_iff {β : Type*} {T : Set (Set β)} {f : α → β} :
@ContinuousOn α β _ (.generateFrom T) f s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ t ∈ T, f x ∈ t → f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
forall₂_congr fun x _ => by
delta ContinuousWithinAt
simp only [TopologicalSpace.nhds_generateFrom, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal, mem_setOf_eq,
and_imp]
exact forall_congr' fun t => forall_swap
theorem continuousOn_isOpen_of_generateFrom {β : Type*} {s : Set α} {T : Set (Set β)} {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ t ∈ T, IsOpen (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t)) :
@ContinuousOn α β _ (.generateFrom T) f s :=
continuousOn_to_generateFrom_iff.2 fun _x hx t ht hxt => mem_nhdsWithin.2
⟨_, h t ht, ⟨hx, hxt⟩, fun _y hy => hy.1.2⟩
/-!
### Congruence and monotonicity properties with respect to sets
-/
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.mono (h : ContinuousWithinAt f t x)
(hs : s ⊆ t) : ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
h.mono_left (nhdsWithin_mono x hs)
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin (h : ContinuousWithinAt f t x) (hs : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
h.mono_left (nhdsWithin_le_of_mem hs)
/-- If two sets coincide around `x`, then being continuous within one or the other at `x` is
equivalent. See also `continuousWithinAt_congr_set'` which requires that the sets coincide
locally away from a point `y`, in a T1 space. -/
theorem continuousWithinAt_congr_set (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f t x := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq.mpr h]
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.congr_set (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
ContinuousWithinAt f t x :=
(continuousWithinAt_congr_set h).1 hf
theorem continuousWithinAt_inter' (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (s ∩ t) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x := by
simp [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_restrict'' s h]
theorem continuousWithinAt_inter (h : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (s ∩ t) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x := by
simp [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_restrict' s h]
theorem continuousWithinAt_union :
ContinuousWithinAt f (s ∪ t) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧ ContinuousWithinAt f t x := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_union, tendsto_sup]
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.union (hs : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (ht : ContinuousWithinAt f t x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (s ∪ t) x :=
continuousWithinAt_union.2 ⟨hs, ht⟩
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_singleton : ContinuousWithinAt f {x} x := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_singleton, tendsto_pure_nhds]
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_insert_self :
ContinuousWithinAt f (insert x s) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x := by
simp only [← singleton_union, continuousWithinAt_union, continuousWithinAt_singleton, true_and]
protected alias ⟨_, ContinuousWithinAt.insert⟩ := continuousWithinAt_insert_self
/- `continuousWithinAt_insert` gives the same equivalence but at a point `y` possibly different
from `x`. As this requires the space to be T1, and this property is not available in this file,
this is found in another file although it is part of the basic API for `continuousWithinAt`. -/
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.diff_iff
(ht : ContinuousWithinAt f t x) : ContinuousWithinAt f (s \ t) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
⟨fun h => (h.union ht).mono <| by simp only [diff_union_self, subset_union_left], fun h =>
h.mono diff_subset⟩
|
/-- See also `continuousWithinAt_diff_singleton` for the case of `s \ {y}`, but
requiring `T1Space α. -/
| Mathlib/Topology/ContinuousOn.lean | 766 | 768 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SetFamily.Shadow
/-!
# UV-compressions
This file defines UV-compression. It is an operation on a set family that reduces its shadow.
UV-compressing `a : α` along `u v : α` means replacing `a` by `(a ⊔ u) \ v` if `a` and `u` are
disjoint and `v ≤ a`. In some sense, it's moving `a` from `v` to `u`.
UV-compressions are immensely useful to prove the Kruskal-Katona theorem. The idea is that
compressing a set family might decrease the size of its shadow, so iterated compressions hopefully
minimise the shadow.
## Main declarations
* `UV.compress`: `compress u v a` is `a` compressed along `u` and `v`.
* `UV.compression`: `compression u v s` is the compression of the set family `s` along `u` and `v`.
It is the compressions of the elements of `s` whose compression is not already in `s` along with
the element whose compression is already in `s`. This way of splitting into what moves and what
does not ensures the compression doesn't squash the set family, which is proved by
`UV.card_compression`.
* `UV.card_shadow_compression_le`: Compressing reduces the size of the shadow. This is a key fact in
the proof of Kruskal-Katona.
## Notation
`𝓒` (typed with `\MCC`) is notation for `UV.compression` in locale `FinsetFamily`.
## Notes
Even though our emphasis is on `Finset α`, we define UV-compressions more generally in a generalized
boolean algebra, so that one can use it for `Set α`.
## References
* https://github.com/b-mehta/maths-notes/blob/master/iii/mich/combinatorics.pdf
## Tags
compression, UV-compression, shadow
-/
open Finset
variable {α : Type*}
/-- UV-compression is injective on the elements it moves. See `UV.compress`. -/
theorem sup_sdiff_injOn [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] (u v : α) :
{ x | Disjoint u x ∧ v ≤ x }.InjOn fun x => (x ⊔ u) \ v := by
rintro a ha b hb hab
have h : ((a ⊔ u) \ v) \ u ⊔ v = ((b ⊔ u) \ v) \ u ⊔ v := by
dsimp at hab
rw [hab]
rwa [sdiff_sdiff_comm, ha.1.symm.sup_sdiff_cancel_right, sdiff_sdiff_comm,
hb.1.symm.sup_sdiff_cancel_right, sdiff_sup_cancel ha.2, sdiff_sup_cancel hb.2] at h
-- The namespace is here to distinguish from other compressions.
namespace UV
/-! ### UV-compression in generalized boolean algebras -/
section GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] [DecidableRel (@Disjoint α _ _)]
[DecidableLE α] {s : Finset α} {u v a : α}
/-- UV-compressing `a` means removing `v` from it and adding `u` if `a` and `u` are disjoint and
`v ≤ a` (it replaces the `v` part of `a` by the `u` part). Else, UV-compressing `a` doesn't do
anything. This is most useful when `u` and `v` are disjoint finsets of the same size. -/
def compress (u v a : α) : α :=
if Disjoint u a ∧ v ≤ a then (a ⊔ u) \ v else a
theorem compress_of_disjoint_of_le (hua : Disjoint u a) (hva : v ≤ a) :
compress u v a = (a ⊔ u) \ v :=
if_pos ⟨hua, hva⟩
theorem compress_of_disjoint_of_le' (hva : Disjoint v a) (hua : u ≤ a) :
compress u v ((a ⊔ v) \ u) = a := by
rw [compress_of_disjoint_of_le disjoint_sdiff_self_right
(le_sdiff.2 ⟨(le_sup_right : v ≤ a ⊔ v), hva.mono_right hua⟩),
sdiff_sup_cancel (le_sup_of_le_left hua), hva.symm.sup_sdiff_cancel_right]
|
@[simp]
theorem compress_self (u a : α) : compress u u a = a := by
unfold compress
split_ifs with h
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SetFamily/Compression/UV.lean | 90 | 94 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.BumpFunction.FiniteDimension
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.ContMDiff.Atlas
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.ContMDiff.NormedSpace
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.ProperSpace.Lemmas
/-!
# Smooth bump functions on a smooth manifold
In this file we define `SmoothBumpFunction I c` to be a bundled smooth "bump" function centered at
`c`. It is a structure that consists of two real numbers `0 < rIn < rOut` with small enough `rOut`.
We define a coercion to function for this type, and for `f : SmoothBumpFunction I c`, the function
`⇑f` written in the extended chart at `c` has the following properties:
* `f x = 1` in the closed ball of radius `f.rIn` centered at `c`;
* `f x = 0` outside of the ball of radius `f.rOut` centered at `c`;
* `0 ≤ f x ≤ 1` for all `x`.
The actual statements involve (pre)images under `extChartAt I f` and are given as lemmas in the
`SmoothBumpFunction` namespace.
## Tags
manifold, smooth bump function
-/
universe uE uF uH uM
variable {E : Type uE} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
{H : Type uH} [TopologicalSpace H] {I : ModelWithCorners ℝ E H} {M : Type uM} [TopologicalSpace M]
[ChartedSpace H M]
open Function Filter Module Set Metric
open scoped Topology Manifold ContDiff
noncomputable section
/-!
### Smooth bump function
In this section we define a structure for a bundled smooth bump function and prove its properties.
-/
variable (I) in
/-- Given a smooth manifold modelled on a finite dimensional space `E`,
`f : SmoothBumpFunction I M` is a smooth function on `M` such that in the extended chart `e` at
`f.c`:
* `f x = 1` in the closed ball of radius `f.rIn` centered at `f.c`;
* `f x = 0` outside of the ball of radius `f.rOut` centered at `f.c`;
* `0 ≤ f x ≤ 1` for all `x`.
The structure contains data required to construct a function with these properties. The function is
available as `⇑f` or `f x`. Formal statements of the properties listed above involve some
(pre)images under `extChartAt I f.c` and are given as lemmas in the `SmoothBumpFunction`
namespace. -/
structure SmoothBumpFunction (c : M) extends ContDiffBump (extChartAt I c c) where
closedBall_subset : closedBall (extChartAt I c c) rOut ∩ range I ⊆ (extChartAt I c).target
namespace SmoothBumpFunction
section FiniteDimensional
variable [FiniteDimensional ℝ E]
variable {c : M} (f : SmoothBumpFunction I c) {x : M}
/-- The function defined by `f : SmoothBumpFunction c`. Use automatic coercion to function
instead. -/
@[coe] def toFun : M → ℝ :=
indicator (chartAt H c).source (f.toContDiffBump ∘ extChartAt I c)
instance : CoeFun (SmoothBumpFunction I c) fun _ => M → ℝ :=
⟨toFun⟩
theorem coe_def : ⇑f = indicator (chartAt H c).source (f.toContDiffBump ∘ extChartAt I c) :=
rfl
end FiniteDimensional
variable {c : M} (f : SmoothBumpFunction I c) {x : M}
theorem rOut_pos : 0 < f.rOut :=
f.toContDiffBump.rOut_pos
theorem ball_subset : ball (extChartAt I c c) f.rOut ∩ range I ⊆ (extChartAt I c).target :=
Subset.trans (inter_subset_inter_left _ ball_subset_closedBall) f.closedBall_subset
theorem ball_inter_range_eq_ball_inter_target :
ball (extChartAt I c c) f.rOut ∩ range I =
ball (extChartAt I c c) f.rOut ∩ (extChartAt I c).target :=
(subset_inter inter_subset_left f.ball_subset).antisymm <| inter_subset_inter_right _ <|
extChartAt_target_subset_range _
section FiniteDimensional
variable [FiniteDimensional ℝ E]
theorem eqOn_source : EqOn f (f.toContDiffBump ∘ extChartAt I c) (chartAt H c).source :=
eqOn_indicator
theorem eventuallyEq_of_mem_source (hx : x ∈ (chartAt H c).source) :
f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f.toContDiffBump ∘ extChartAt I c :=
f.eqOn_source.eventuallyEq_of_mem <| (chartAt H c).open_source.mem_nhds hx
theorem one_of_dist_le (hs : x ∈ (chartAt H c).source)
(hd : dist (extChartAt I c x) (extChartAt I c c) ≤ f.rIn) : f x = 1 := by
simp only [f.eqOn_source hs, (· ∘ ·), f.one_of_mem_closedBall hd]
theorem support_eq_inter_preimage :
support f = (chartAt H c).source ∩ extChartAt I c ⁻¹' ball (extChartAt I c c) f.rOut := by
rw [coe_def, support_indicator, support_comp_eq_preimage, ← extChartAt_source I,
← (extChartAt I c).symm_image_target_inter_eq', ← (extChartAt I c).symm_image_target_inter_eq',
f.support_eq]
theorem isOpen_support : IsOpen (support f) := by
rw [support_eq_inter_preimage]
exact isOpen_extChartAt_preimage c isOpen_ball
theorem support_eq_symm_image :
support f = (extChartAt I c).symm '' (ball (extChartAt I c c) f.rOut ∩ range I) := by
rw [f.support_eq_inter_preimage, ← extChartAt_source I,
← (extChartAt I c).symm_image_target_inter_eq', inter_comm,
ball_inter_range_eq_ball_inter_target]
theorem support_subset_source : support f ⊆ (chartAt H c).source := by
rw [f.support_eq_inter_preimage, ← extChartAt_source I]; exact inter_subset_left
theorem image_eq_inter_preimage_of_subset_support {s : Set M} (hs : s ⊆ support f) :
extChartAt I c '' s =
closedBall (extChartAt I c c) f.rOut ∩ range I ∩ (extChartAt I c).symm ⁻¹' s := by
rw [support_eq_inter_preimage, subset_inter_iff, ← extChartAt_source I, ← image_subset_iff] at hs
obtain ⟨hse, hsf⟩ := hs
apply Subset.antisymm
· refine subset_inter (subset_inter (hsf.trans ball_subset_closedBall) ?_) ?_
· rintro _ ⟨x, -, rfl⟩; exact mem_range_self _
· rw [(extChartAt I c).image_eq_target_inter_inv_preimage hse]
exact inter_subset_right
· refine Subset.trans (inter_subset_inter_left _ f.closedBall_subset) ?_
rw [(extChartAt I c).image_eq_target_inter_inv_preimage hse]
theorem mem_Icc : f x ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1 := by
have : f x = 0 ∨ f x = _ := indicator_eq_zero_or_self _ _ _
rcases this with h | h <;> rw [h]
exacts [left_mem_Icc.2 zero_le_one, ⟨f.nonneg, f.le_one⟩]
theorem nonneg : 0 ≤ f x :=
f.mem_Icc.1
theorem le_one : f x ≤ 1 :=
f.mem_Icc.2
theorem eventuallyEq_one_of_dist_lt (hs : x ∈ (chartAt H c).source)
(hd : dist (extChartAt I c x) (extChartAt I c c) < f.rIn) : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] 1 := by
filter_upwards [IsOpen.mem_nhds (isOpen_extChartAt_preimage c isOpen_ball) ⟨hs, hd⟩]
rintro z ⟨hzs, hzd⟩
exact f.one_of_dist_le hzs <| le_of_lt hzd
theorem eventuallyEq_one : f =ᶠ[𝓝 c] 1 :=
f.eventuallyEq_one_of_dist_lt (mem_chart_source _ _) <| by rw [dist_self]; exact f.rIn_pos
@[simp]
theorem eq_one : f c = 1 :=
f.eventuallyEq_one.eq_of_nhds
theorem support_mem_nhds : support f ∈ 𝓝 c :=
f.eventuallyEq_one.mono fun x hx => by rw [hx]; exact one_ne_zero
theorem tsupport_mem_nhds : tsupport f ∈ 𝓝 c :=
mem_of_superset f.support_mem_nhds subset_closure
theorem c_mem_support : c ∈ support f :=
mem_of_mem_nhds f.support_mem_nhds
|
theorem nonempty_support : (support f).Nonempty :=
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/BumpFunction.lean | 179 | 180 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Range
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Topology.Defs.Filter
/-!
# Openness and closedness of a set
This file provides lemmas relating to the predicates `IsOpen` and `IsClosed` of a set endowed with
a topology.
## Implementation notes
Topology in mathlib heavily uses filters (even more than in Bourbaki). See explanations in
<https://leanprover-community.github.io/theories/topology.html>.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
* [I. M. James, *Topologies and Uniformities*][james1999]
## Tags
topological space
-/
open Set Filter Topology
universe u v
/-- A constructor for topologies by specifying the closed sets,
and showing that they satisfy the appropriate conditions. -/
def TopologicalSpace.ofClosed {X : Type u} (T : Set (Set X)) (empty_mem : ∅ ∈ T)
(sInter_mem : ∀ A, A ⊆ T → ⋂₀ A ∈ T)
(union_mem : ∀ A, A ∈ T → ∀ B, B ∈ T → A ∪ B ∈ T) : TopologicalSpace X where
IsOpen X := Xᶜ ∈ T
isOpen_univ := by simp [empty_mem]
isOpen_inter s t hs ht := by simpa only [compl_inter] using union_mem sᶜ hs tᶜ ht
isOpen_sUnion s hs := by
simp only [Set.compl_sUnion]
exact sInter_mem (compl '' s) fun z ⟨y, hy, hz⟩ => hz ▸ hs y hy
section TopologicalSpace
variable {X : Type u} {ι : Sort v} {α : Type*} {x : X} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set X} {p p₁ p₂ : X → Prop}
lemma isOpen_mk {p h₁ h₂ h₃} : IsOpen[⟨p, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩] s ↔ p s := Iff.rfl
@[ext (iff := false)]
protected theorem TopologicalSpace.ext :
∀ {f g : TopologicalSpace X}, IsOpen[f] = IsOpen[g] → f = g
| ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, rfl => rfl
protected theorem TopologicalSpace.ext_iff {t t' : TopologicalSpace X} :
t = t' ↔ ∀ s, IsOpen[t] s ↔ IsOpen[t'] s :=
⟨fun h _ => h ▸ Iff.rfl, fun h => by ext; exact h _⟩
theorem isOpen_fold {t : TopologicalSpace X} : t.IsOpen s = IsOpen[t] s :=
rfl
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
theorem isOpen_iUnion {f : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsOpen (f i)) : IsOpen (⋃ i, f i) :=
isOpen_sUnion (forall_mem_range.2 h)
theorem isOpen_biUnion {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
isOpen_iUnion fun i => isOpen_iUnion fun hi => h i hi
theorem IsOpen.union (h₁ : IsOpen s₁) (h₂ : IsOpen s₂) : IsOpen (s₁ ∪ s₂) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion]; exact isOpen_iUnion (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨h₂, h₁⟩)
lemma isOpen_iff_of_cover {f : α → Set X} (ho : ∀ i, IsOpen (f i)) (hU : (⋃ i, f i) = univ) :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ i, IsOpen (f i ∩ s) := by
refine ⟨fun h i ↦ (ho i).inter h, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← s.inter_univ, inter_comm, ← hU, iUnion_inter]
exact isOpen_iUnion fun i ↦ h i
@[simp] theorem isOpen_empty : IsOpen (∅ : Set X) := by
rw [← sUnion_empty]; exact isOpen_sUnion fun a => False.elim
theorem Set.Finite.isOpen_sInter {s : Set (Set X)} (hs : s.Finite) (h : ∀ t ∈ s, IsOpen t) :
IsOpen (⋂₀ s) := by
induction s, hs using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => rw [sInter_empty]; exact isOpen_univ
| insert _ _ ih =>
simp only [sInter_insert, forall_mem_insert] at h ⊢
exact h.1.inter (ih h.2)
theorem Set.Finite.isOpen_biInter {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
sInter_image f s ▸ (hs.image _).isOpen_sInter (forall_mem_image.2 h)
theorem isOpen_iInter_of_finite [Finite ι] {s : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsOpen (s i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i, s i) :=
(finite_range _).isOpen_sInter (forall_mem_range.2 h)
theorem isOpen_biInter_finset {s : Finset α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.isOpen_biInter h
@[simp]
theorem isOpen_const {p : Prop} : IsOpen { _x : X | p } := by by_cases p <;> simp [*]
theorem IsOpen.and : IsOpen { x | p₁ x } → IsOpen { x | p₂ x } → IsOpen { x | p₁ x ∧ p₂ x } :=
IsOpen.inter
@[simp] theorem isOpen_compl_iff : IsOpen sᶜ ↔ IsClosed s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h⟩, fun h => h.isOpen_compl⟩
theorem TopologicalSpace.ext_iff_isClosed {X} {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace X} :
t₁ = t₂ ↔ ∀ s, IsClosed[t₁] s ↔ IsClosed[t₂] s := by
rw [TopologicalSpace.ext_iff, compl_surjective.forall]
simp only [@isOpen_compl_iff _ _ t₁, @isOpen_compl_iff _ _ t₂]
alias ⟨_, TopologicalSpace.ext_isClosed⟩ := TopologicalSpace.ext_iff_isClosed
theorem isClosed_const {p : Prop} : IsClosed { _x : X | p } := ⟨isOpen_const (p := ¬p)⟩
@[simp] theorem isClosed_empty : IsClosed (∅ : Set X) := isClosed_const
@[simp] theorem isClosed_univ : IsClosed (univ : Set X) := isClosed_const
lemma IsOpen.isLocallyClosed (hs : IsOpen s) : IsLocallyClosed s :=
⟨_, _, hs, isClosed_univ, (inter_univ _).symm⟩
lemma IsClosed.isLocallyClosed (hs : IsClosed s) : IsLocallyClosed s :=
⟨_, _, isOpen_univ, hs, (univ_inter _).symm⟩
theorem IsClosed.union : IsClosed s₁ → IsClosed s₂ → IsClosed (s₁ ∪ s₂) := by
simpa only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_union] using IsOpen.inter
theorem isClosed_sInter {s : Set (Set X)} : (∀ t ∈ s, IsClosed t) → IsClosed (⋂₀ s) := by
simpa only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_sInter, sUnion_image] using isOpen_biUnion
theorem isClosed_iInter {f : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsClosed (f i)) : IsClosed (⋂ i, f i) :=
isClosed_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 h
theorem isClosed_biInter {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
isClosed_iInter fun i => isClosed_iInter <| h i
@[simp]
theorem isClosed_compl_iff {s : Set X} : IsClosed sᶜ ↔ IsOpen s := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_compl]
alias ⟨_, IsOpen.isClosed_compl⟩ := isClosed_compl_iff
theorem IsOpen.sdiff (h₁ : IsOpen s) (h₂ : IsClosed t) : IsOpen (s \ t) :=
IsOpen.inter h₁ h₂.isOpen_compl
theorem IsClosed.inter (h₁ : IsClosed s₁) (h₂ : IsClosed s₂) : IsClosed (s₁ ∩ s₂) := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff] at *
rw [compl_inter]
exact IsOpen.union h₁ h₂
theorem IsClosed.sdiff (h₁ : IsClosed s) (h₂ : IsOpen t) : IsClosed (s \ t) :=
IsClosed.inter h₁ (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr h₂)
theorem Set.Finite.isClosed_biUnion {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_iUnion] at *
exact hs.isOpen_biInter h
lemma isClosed_biUnion_finset {s : Finset α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.isClosed_biUnion h
theorem isClosed_iUnion_of_finite [Finite ι] {s : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsClosed (s i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i, s i) := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_iUnion] at *
exact isOpen_iInter_of_finite h
theorem isClosed_imp {p q : X → Prop} (hp : IsOpen { x | p x }) (hq : IsClosed { x | q x }) :
IsClosed { x | p x → q x } := by
simpa only [imp_iff_not_or] using hp.isClosed_compl.union hq
theorem IsClosed.not : IsClosed { a | p a } → IsOpen { a | ¬p a } :=
isOpen_compl_iff.mpr
/-!
### Limits of filters in topological spaces
In this section we define functions that return a limit of a filter (or of a function along a
filter), if it exists, and a random point otherwise. These functions are rarely used in Mathlib,
most of the theorems are written using `Filter.Tendsto`. One of the reasons is that
`Filter.limUnder f g = x` is not equivalent to `Filter.Tendsto g f (𝓝 x)` unless the codomain is a
Hausdorff space and `g` has a limit along `f`.
-/
section lim
/-- If a filter `f` is majorated by some `𝓝 x`, then it is majorated by `𝓝 (Filter.lim f)`. We
formulate this lemma with a `[Nonempty X]` argument of `lim` derived from `h` to make it useful for
types without a `[Nonempty X]` instance. Because of the built-in proof irrelevance, Lean will unify
this instance with any other instance. -/
theorem le_nhds_lim {f : Filter X} (h : ∃ x, f ≤ 𝓝 x) : f ≤ 𝓝 (@lim _ _ (nonempty_of_exists h) f) :=
Classical.epsilon_spec h
/-- If `g` tends to some `𝓝 x` along `f`, then it tends to `𝓝 (Filter.limUnder f g)`. We formulate
this lemma with a `[Nonempty X]` argument of `lim` derived from `h` to make it useful for types
without a `[Nonempty X]` instance. Because of the built-in proof irrelevance, Lean will unify this
instance with any other instance. -/
theorem tendsto_nhds_limUnder {f : Filter α} {g : α → X} (h : ∃ x, Tendsto g f (𝓝 x)) :
Tendsto g f (𝓝 (@limUnder _ _ _ (nonempty_of_exists h) f g)) :=
le_nhds_lim h
theorem limUnder_of_not_tendsto [hX : Nonempty X] {f : Filter α} {g : α → X}
(h : ¬ ∃ x, Tendsto g f (𝓝 x)) :
limUnder f g = Classical.choice hX := by
simp_rw [Tendsto] at h
simp_rw [limUnder, lim, Classical.epsilon, Classical.strongIndefiniteDescription, dif_neg h]
end lim
end TopologicalSpace
| Mathlib/Topology/Basic.lean | 362 | 364 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Kevin Kappelmann
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Floor.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Floor.Ring
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Floor.Semiring
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Floor.lean | 1,012 | 1,012 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.MeasurableLIntegral
/-!
# With Density
For an s-finite kernel `κ : Kernel α β` and a function `f : α → β → ℝ≥0∞` which is finite
everywhere, we define `withDensity κ f` as the kernel `a ↦ (κ a).withDensity (f a)`. This is
an s-finite kernel.
## Main definitions
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.withDensity κ (f : α → β → ℝ≥0∞)`:
kernel `a ↦ (κ a).withDensity (f a)`. It is defined if `κ` is s-finite. If `f` is finite
everywhere, then this is also an s-finite kernel. The class of s-finite kernels is the smallest
class of kernels that contains finite kernels and which is stable by `withDensity`.
Integral: `∫⁻ b, g b ∂(withDensity κ f a) = ∫⁻ b, f a b * g b ∂(κ a)`
## Main statements
* `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.lintegral_withDensity`:
`∫⁻ b, g b ∂(withDensity κ f a) = ∫⁻ b, f a b * g b ∂(κ a)`
-/
open MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory
open scoped MeasureTheory ENNReal NNReal
namespace ProbabilityTheory.Kernel
variable {α β ι : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β}
variable {κ : Kernel α β} {f : α → β → ℝ≥0∞}
/-- Kernel with image `(κ a).withDensity (f a)` if `Function.uncurry f` is measurable, and
with image 0 otherwise. If `Function.uncurry f` is measurable, it satisfies
`∫⁻ b, g b ∂(withDensity κ f hf a) = ∫⁻ b, f a b * g b ∂(κ a)`. -/
noncomputable def withDensity (κ : Kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] (f : α → β → ℝ≥0∞) :
Kernel α β :=
@dite _ (Measurable (Function.uncurry f)) (Classical.dec _) (fun hf =>
(⟨fun a => (κ a).withDensity (f a),
by
refine Measure.measurable_of_measurable_coe _ fun s hs => ?_
simp_rw [withDensity_apply _ hs]
exact hf.setLIntegral_kernel_prod_right hs⟩ : Kernel α β)) fun _ => 0
theorem withDensity_of_not_measurable (κ : Kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ]
(hf : ¬Measurable (Function.uncurry f)) : withDensity κ f = 0 := by classical exact dif_neg hf
protected theorem withDensity_apply (κ : Kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ]
(hf : Measurable (Function.uncurry f)) (a : α) :
withDensity κ f a = (κ a).withDensity (f a) := by
classical
rw [withDensity, dif_pos hf]
rfl
protected theorem withDensity_apply' (κ : Kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ]
(hf : Measurable (Function.uncurry f)) (a : α) (s : Set β) :
withDensity κ f a s = ∫⁻ b in s, f a b ∂κ a := by
rw [Kernel.withDensity_apply κ hf, withDensity_apply' _ s]
nonrec lemma withDensity_congr_ae (κ : Kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] {f g : α → β → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : Measurable (Function.uncurry f)) (hg : Measurable (Function.uncurry g))
(hfg : ∀ a, f a =ᵐ[κ a] g a) :
withDensity κ f = withDensity κ g := by
ext a
rw [Kernel.withDensity_apply _ hf,Kernel.withDensity_apply _ hg, withDensity_congr_ae (hfg a)]
nonrec lemma withDensity_absolutelyContinuous [IsSFiniteKernel κ]
(f : α → β → ℝ≥0∞) (a : α) :
Kernel.withDensity κ f a ≪ κ a := by
by_cases hf : Measurable (Function.uncurry f)
· rw [Kernel.withDensity_apply _ hf]
exact withDensity_absolutelyContinuous _ _
· rw [withDensity_of_not_measurable _ hf]
simp [Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous.zero]
@[simp]
lemma withDensity_one (κ : Kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] :
Kernel.withDensity κ 1 = κ := by
ext; rw [Kernel.withDensity_apply _ measurable_const]; simp
@[simp]
lemma withDensity_one' (κ : Kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] :
Kernel.withDensity κ (fun _ _ ↦ 1) = κ := Kernel.withDensity_one _
@[simp]
lemma withDensity_zero (κ : Kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] :
Kernel.withDensity κ 0 = 0 := by
ext; rw [Kernel.withDensity_apply _ measurable_const]; simp
@[simp]
lemma withDensity_zero' (κ : Kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] :
Kernel.withDensity κ (fun _ _ ↦ 0) = 0 := Kernel.withDensity_zero _
theorem lintegral_withDensity (κ : Kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ]
(hf : Measurable (Function.uncurry f)) (a : α) {g : β → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : Measurable g) :
∫⁻ b, g b ∂withDensity κ f a = ∫⁻ b, f a b * g b ∂κ a := by
rw [Kernel.withDensity_apply _ hf,
lintegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul _ (Measurable.of_uncurry_left hf) hg]
simp_rw [Pi.mul_apply]
theorem integral_withDensity {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
{f : β → E} [IsSFiniteKernel κ] {a : α} {g : α → β → ℝ≥0}
(hg : Measurable (Function.uncurry g)) :
∫ b, f b ∂withDensity κ (fun a b => g a b) a = ∫ b, g a b • f b ∂κ a := by
rw [Kernel.withDensity_apply, integral_withDensity_eq_integral_smul]
· fun_prop
· fun_prop
theorem withDensity_add_left (κ η : Kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] [IsSFiniteKernel η]
(f : α → β → ℝ≥0∞) : withDensity (κ + η) f = withDensity κ f + withDensity η f := by
by_cases hf : Measurable (Function.uncurry f)
· ext a s
simp only [Kernel.withDensity_apply _ hf, coe_add, Pi.add_apply, withDensity_add_measure,
Measure.add_apply]
· simp_rw [withDensity_of_not_measurable _ hf]
rw [zero_add]
theorem withDensity_kernel_sum [Countable ι] (κ : ι → Kernel α β) (hκ : ∀ i, IsSFiniteKernel (κ i))
(f : α → β → ℝ≥0∞) :
withDensity (Kernel.sum κ) f = Kernel.sum fun i => withDensity (κ i) f := by
by_cases hf : Measurable (Function.uncurry f)
· ext1 a
simp_rw [sum_apply, Kernel.withDensity_apply _ hf, sum_apply,
withDensity_sum (fun n => κ n a) (f a)]
· simp_rw [withDensity_of_not_measurable _ hf]
exact sum_zero.symm
lemma withDensity_add_right [IsSFiniteKernel κ] {f g : α → β → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : Measurable (Function.uncurry f)) (hg : Measurable (Function.uncurry g)) :
withDensity κ (f + g) = withDensity κ f + withDensity κ g := by
ext a
rw [coe_add, Pi.add_apply, Kernel.withDensity_apply _ hf, Kernel.withDensity_apply _ hg,
Kernel.withDensity_apply, Pi.add_apply, MeasureTheory.withDensity_add_right]
· fun_prop
· exact hf.add hg
lemma withDensity_sub_add_cancel [IsSFiniteKernel κ] {f g : α → β → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : Measurable (Function.uncurry f)) (hg : Measurable (Function.uncurry g))
(hfg : ∀ a, g a ≤ᵐ[κ a] f a) :
withDensity κ (fun a x ↦ f a x - g a x) + withDensity κ g = withDensity κ f := by
rw [← withDensity_add_right _ hg]
swap; · exact hf.sub hg
refine withDensity_congr_ae κ ((hf.sub hg).add hg) hf (fun a ↦ ?_)
filter_upwards [hfg a] with x hx
rwa [Pi.add_apply, Pi.add_apply, tsub_add_cancel_iff_le]
theorem withDensity_tsum [Countable ι] (κ : Kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] {f : ι → α → β → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ∀ i, Measurable (Function.uncurry (f i))) :
withDensity κ (∑' n, f n) = Kernel.sum fun n => withDensity κ (f n) := by
have h_sum_a : ∀ a, Summable fun n => f n a := fun a => Pi.summable.mpr fun b => ENNReal.summable
have h_sum : Summable fun n => f n := Pi.summable.mpr h_sum_a
ext a s hs
rw [sum_apply' _ a hs, Kernel.withDensity_apply' κ _ a s]
swap
· have : Function.uncurry (∑' n, f n) = ∑' n, Function.uncurry (f n) := by
ext1 p
simp only [Function.uncurry_def]
rw [tsum_apply h_sum, tsum_apply (h_sum_a _), tsum_apply]
exact Pi.summable.mpr fun p => ENNReal.summable
rw [this]
fun_prop
have : ∫⁻ b in s, (∑' n, f n) a b ∂κ a = ∫⁻ b in s, ∑' n, (fun b => f n a b) b ∂κ a := by
congr with b
rw [tsum_apply h_sum, tsum_apply (h_sum_a a)]
rw [this, lintegral_tsum fun n => by fun_prop]
congr with n
rw [Kernel.withDensity_apply' _ (hf n) a s]
/-- If a kernel `κ` is finite and a function `f : α → β → ℝ≥0∞` is bounded, then `withDensity κ f`
is finite. -/
theorem isFiniteKernel_withDensity_of_bounded (κ : Kernel α β) [IsFiniteKernel κ] {B : ℝ≥0∞}
(hB_top : B ≠ ∞) (hf_B : ∀ a b, f a b ≤ B) : IsFiniteKernel (withDensity κ f) := by
by_cases hf : Measurable (Function.uncurry f)
· exact ⟨⟨B * IsFiniteKernel.bound κ, ENNReal.mul_lt_top hB_top.lt_top
(IsFiniteKernel.bound_lt_top κ), fun a => by
rw [Kernel.withDensity_apply' κ hf a Set.univ]
calc
∫⁻ b in Set.univ, f a b ∂κ a ≤ ∫⁻ _ in Set.univ, B ∂κ a := lintegral_mono (hf_B a)
_ = B * κ a Set.univ := by
simp only [Measure.restrict_univ, MeasureTheory.lintegral_const]
_ ≤ B * IsFiniteKernel.bound κ := mul_le_mul_left' (measure_le_bound κ a Set.univ) _⟩⟩
· rw [withDensity_of_not_measurable _ hf]
infer_instance
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `IsSFiniteKernel.withDensity`.
If a kernel `κ` is finite, then `withDensity κ f` is s-finite. -/
theorem isSFiniteKernel_withDensity_of_isFiniteKernel (κ : Kernel α β) [IsFiniteKernel κ]
(hf_ne_top : ∀ a b, f a b ≠ ∞) : IsSFiniteKernel (withDensity κ f) := by
-- We already have that for `f` bounded from above and a `κ` a finite kernel,
-- `withDensity κ f` is finite. We write any function as a countable sum of bounded
-- functions, and decompose an s-finite kernel as a sum of finite kernels. We then use that
-- `withDensity` commutes with sums for both arguments and get a sum of finite kernels.
by_cases hf : Measurable (Function.uncurry f)
swap; · rw [withDensity_of_not_measurable _ hf]; infer_instance
let fs : ℕ → α → β → ℝ≥0∞ := fun n a b => min (f a b) (n + 1) - min (f a b) n
have h_le : ∀ a b n, ⌈(f a b).toReal⌉₊ ≤ n → f a b ≤ n := by
intro a b n hn
have : (f a b).toReal ≤ n := Nat.le_of_ceil_le hn
rw [← ENNReal.le_ofReal_iff_toReal_le (hf_ne_top a b) _] at this
· refine this.trans (le_of_eq ?_)
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_natCast]
· norm_cast
exact zero_le _
have h_zero : ∀ a b n, ⌈(f a b).toReal⌉₊ ≤ n → fs n a b = 0 := by
intro a b n hn
suffices min (f a b) (n + 1) = f a b ∧ min (f a b) n = f a b by
simp_rw [fs, this.1, this.2, tsub_self (f a b)]
exact ⟨min_eq_left ((h_le a b n hn).trans (le_add_of_nonneg_right zero_le_one)),
min_eq_left (h_le a b n hn)⟩
have hf_eq_tsum : f = ∑' n, fs n := by
have h_sum_a : ∀ a, Summable fun n => fs n a := by
refine fun a => Pi.summable.mpr fun b => ?_
suffices ∀ n, n ∉ Finset.range ⌈(f a b).toReal⌉₊ → fs n a b = 0 from
summable_of_ne_finset_zero this
intro n hn_not_mem
rw [Finset.mem_range, not_lt] at hn_not_mem
exact h_zero a b n hn_not_mem
ext a b : 2
rw [tsum_apply (Pi.summable.mpr h_sum_a), tsum_apply (h_sum_a a),
ENNReal.tsum_eq_liminf_sum_nat]
have h_finset_sum : ∀ n, ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, fs i a b = min (f a b) n := by
intro n
induction' n with n hn
· simp
rw [Finset.sum_range_succ, hn]
simp [fs]
simp_rw [h_finset_sum]
refine (Filter.Tendsto.liminf_eq ?_).symm
refine Filter.Tendsto.congr' ?_ tendsto_const_nhds
rw [Filter.EventuallyEq, Filter.eventually_atTop]
exact ⟨⌈(f a b).toReal⌉₊, fun n hn => (min_eq_left (h_le a b n hn)).symm⟩
rw [hf_eq_tsum, withDensity_tsum _ fun n : ℕ => _]
swap; · fun_prop
refine isSFiniteKernel_sum (hκs := fun n => ?_)
suffices IsFiniteKernel (withDensity κ (fs n)) by haveI := this; infer_instance
refine isFiniteKernel_withDensity_of_bounded _ (ENNReal.coe_ne_top : ↑n + 1 ≠ ∞) fun a b => ?_
-- After https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2734, we need to do beta reduction before `norm_cast`
beta_reduce
norm_cast
calc
fs n a b ≤ min (f a b) (n + 1) := tsub_le_self
_ ≤ n + 1 := min_le_right _ _
_ = ↑(n + 1) := by norm_cast
/-- For an s-finite kernel `κ` and a function `f : α → β → ℝ≥0∞` which is everywhere finite,
`withDensity κ f` is s-finite. -/
nonrec theorem IsSFiniteKernel.withDensity (κ : Kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ]
(hf_ne_top : ∀ a b, f a b ≠ ∞) : IsSFiniteKernel (withDensity κ f) := by
have h_eq_sum : withDensity κ f = Kernel.sum fun i => withDensity (seq κ i) f := by
rw [← withDensity_kernel_sum _ _]
congr
exact (kernel_sum_seq κ).symm
rw [h_eq_sum]
exact isSFiniteKernel_sum (hκs := fun n =>
isSFiniteKernel_withDensity_of_isFiniteKernel (seq κ n) hf_ne_top)
/-- For an s-finite kernel `κ` and a function `f : α → β → ℝ≥0`, `withDensity κ f` is s-finite. -/
instance (κ : Kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] (f : α → β → ℝ≥0) :
IsSFiniteKernel (withDensity κ fun a b => f a b) :=
IsSFiniteKernel.withDensity κ fun _ _ => ENNReal.coe_ne_top
|
nonrec lemma withDensity_mul [IsSFiniteKernel κ] {f : α → β → ℝ≥0} {g : α → β → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : Measurable (Function.uncurry f)) (hg : Measurable (Function.uncurry g)) :
withDensity κ (fun a x ↦ f a x * g a x)
= withDensity (withDensity κ fun a x ↦ f a x) g := by
ext a : 1
rw [Kernel.withDensity_apply]
swap; · fun_prop
change (Measure.withDensity (κ a) ((fun x ↦ (f a x : ℝ≥0∞)) * (fun x ↦ (g a x : ℝ≥0∞)))) =
| Mathlib/Probability/Kernel/WithDensity.lean | 269 | 277 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Xavier Roblot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alex J. Best, Xavier Roblot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Hom.Rat
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Polynomial.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.NumberField.Norm
import Mathlib.RingTheory.RootsOfUnity.PrimitiveRoots
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Complex
/-!
# Embeddings of number fields
This file defines the embeddings of a number field into an algebraic closed field.
## Main Definitions and Results
* `NumberField.Embeddings.range_eval_eq_rootSet_minpoly`: let `x ∈ K` with `K` number field and
let `A` be an algebraic closed field of char. 0, then the images of `x` by the embeddings of `K`
in `A` are exactly the roots in `A` of the minimal polynomial of `x` over `ℚ`.
* `NumberField.Embeddings.pow_eq_one_of_norm_eq_one`: an algebraic integer whose conjugates are
all of norm one is a root of unity.
* `NumberField.InfinitePlace`: the type of infinite places of a number field `K`.
* `NumberField.InfinitePlace.mk_eq_iff`: two complex embeddings define the same infinite place iff
they are equal or complex conjugates.
* `NumberField.InfinitePlace.prod_eq_abs_norm`: the infinite part of the product formula, that is
for `x ∈ K`, we have `Π_w ‖x‖_w = |norm(x)|` where the product is over the infinite place `w` and
`‖·‖_w` is the normalized absolute value for `w`.
## Tags
number field, embeddings, places, infinite places
-/
open scoped Finset
namespace NumberField.Embeddings
section Fintype
open Module
variable (K : Type*) [Field K] [NumberField K]
variable (A : Type*) [Field A] [CharZero A]
/-- There are finitely many embeddings of a number field. -/
noncomputable instance : Fintype (K →+* A) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv (K →ₐ[ℚ] A) RingHom.equivRatAlgHom.symm
variable [IsAlgClosed A]
/-- The number of embeddings of a number field is equal to its finrank. -/
theorem card : Fintype.card (K →+* A) = finrank ℚ K := by
rw [Fintype.ofEquiv_card RingHom.equivRatAlgHom.symm, AlgHom.card]
instance : Nonempty (K →+* A) := by
rw [← Fintype.card_pos_iff, NumberField.Embeddings.card K A]
exact Module.finrank_pos
end Fintype
section Roots
open Set Polynomial
variable (K A : Type*) [Field K] [NumberField K] [Field A] [Algebra ℚ A] [IsAlgClosed A] (x : K)
/-- Let `A` be an algebraically closed field and let `x ∈ K`, with `K` a number field.
The images of `x` by the embeddings of `K` in `A` are exactly the roots in `A` of
the minimal polynomial of `x` over `ℚ`. -/
theorem range_eval_eq_rootSet_minpoly :
(range fun φ : K →+* A => φ x) = (minpoly ℚ x).rootSet A := by
convert (NumberField.isAlgebraic K).range_eval_eq_rootSet_minpoly A x using 1
ext a
exact ⟨fun ⟨φ, hφ⟩ => ⟨φ.toRatAlgHom, hφ⟩, fun ⟨φ, hφ⟩ => ⟨φ.toRingHom, hφ⟩⟩
end Roots
section Bounded
open Module Polynomial Set
variable {K : Type*} [Field K] [NumberField K]
variable {A : Type*} [NormedField A] [IsAlgClosed A] [NormedAlgebra ℚ A]
theorem coeff_bdd_of_norm_le {B : ℝ} {x : K} (h : ∀ φ : K →+* A, ‖φ x‖ ≤ B) (i : ℕ) :
‖(minpoly ℚ x).coeff i‖ ≤ max B 1 ^ finrank ℚ K * (finrank ℚ K).choose (finrank ℚ K / 2) := by
have hx := Algebra.IsSeparable.isIntegral ℚ x
rw [← norm_algebraMap' A, ← coeff_map (algebraMap ℚ A)]
refine coeff_bdd_of_roots_le _ (minpoly.monic hx)
(IsAlgClosed.splits_codomain _) (minpoly.natDegree_le x) (fun z hz => ?_) i
classical
rw [← Multiset.mem_toFinset] at hz
obtain ⟨φ, rfl⟩ := (range_eval_eq_rootSet_minpoly K A x).symm.subset hz
exact h φ
variable (K A)
/-- Let `B` be a real number. The set of algebraic integers in `K` whose conjugates are all
smaller in norm than `B` is finite. -/
theorem finite_of_norm_le (B : ℝ) : {x : K | IsIntegral ℤ x ∧ ∀ φ : K →+* A, ‖φ x‖ ≤ B}.Finite := by
classical
let C := Nat.ceil (max B 1 ^ finrank ℚ K * (finrank ℚ K).choose (finrank ℚ K / 2))
have := bUnion_roots_finite (algebraMap ℤ K) (finrank ℚ K) (finite_Icc (-C : ℤ) C)
refine this.subset fun x hx => ?_; simp_rw [mem_iUnion]
have h_map_ℚ_minpoly := minpoly.isIntegrallyClosed_eq_field_fractions' ℚ hx.1
refine ⟨_, ⟨?_, fun i => ?_⟩, mem_rootSet.2 ⟨minpoly.ne_zero hx.1, minpoly.aeval ℤ x⟩⟩
· rw [← (minpoly.monic hx.1).natDegree_map (algebraMap ℤ ℚ), ← h_map_ℚ_minpoly]
exact minpoly.natDegree_le x
rw [mem_Icc, ← abs_le, ← @Int.cast_le ℝ]
refine (Eq.trans_le ?_ <| coeff_bdd_of_norm_le hx.2 i).trans (Nat.le_ceil _)
rw [h_map_ℚ_minpoly, coeff_map, eq_intCast, Int.norm_cast_rat, Int.norm_eq_abs, Int.cast_abs]
/-- An algebraic integer whose conjugates are all of norm one is a root of unity. -/
theorem pow_eq_one_of_norm_eq_one {x : K} (hxi : IsIntegral ℤ x) (hx : ∀ φ : K →+* A, ‖φ x‖ = 1) :
∃ (n : ℕ) (_ : 0 < n), x ^ n = 1 := by
obtain ⟨a, -, b, -, habne, h⟩ :=
@Set.Infinite.exists_ne_map_eq_of_mapsTo _ _ _ _ (x ^ · : ℕ → K) Set.infinite_univ
(by exact fun a _ => ⟨hxi.pow a, fun φ => by simp [hx φ]⟩) (finite_of_norm_le K A (1 : ℝ))
wlog hlt : b < a
· exact this K A hxi hx b a habne.symm h.symm (habne.lt_or_lt.resolve_right hlt)
refine ⟨a - b, tsub_pos_of_lt hlt, ?_⟩
rw [← Nat.sub_add_cancel hlt.le, pow_add, mul_left_eq_self₀] at h
refine h.resolve_right fun hp => ?_
specialize hx (IsAlgClosed.lift (R := ℚ)).toRingHom
rw [pow_eq_zero hp, map_zero, norm_zero] at hx; norm_num at hx
end Bounded
end NumberField.Embeddings
section Place
variable {K : Type*} [Field K] {A : Type*} [NormedDivisionRing A] [Nontrivial A] (φ : K →+* A)
/-- An embedding into a normed division ring defines a place of `K` -/
def NumberField.place : AbsoluteValue K ℝ :=
(IsAbsoluteValue.toAbsoluteValue (norm : A → ℝ)).comp φ.injective
@[simp]
theorem NumberField.place_apply (x : K) : (NumberField.place φ) x = norm (φ x) := rfl
end Place
namespace NumberField.ComplexEmbedding
open Complex NumberField
open scoped ComplexConjugate
variable {K : Type*} [Field K] {k : Type*} [Field k]
variable (K) in
/--
A (random) lift of the complex embedding `φ : k →+* ℂ` to an extension `K` of `k`.
-/
noncomputable def lift [Algebra k K] [Algebra.IsAlgebraic k K] (φ : k →+* ℂ) : K →+* ℂ := by
letI := φ.toAlgebra
exact (IsAlgClosed.lift (R := k)).toRingHom
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp_algebraMap [Algebra k K] [Algebra.IsAlgebraic k K] (φ : k →+* ℂ) :
(lift K φ).comp (algebraMap k K) = φ := by
unfold lift
letI := φ.toAlgebra
rw [AlgHom.toRingHom_eq_coe, AlgHom.comp_algebraMap_of_tower, RingHom.algebraMap_toAlgebra']
@[simp]
theorem lift_algebraMap_apply [Algebra k K] [Algebra.IsAlgebraic k K] (φ : k →+* ℂ) (x : k) :
lift K φ (algebraMap k K x) = φ x :=
RingHom.congr_fun (lift_comp_algebraMap φ) x
/-- The conjugate of a complex embedding as a complex embedding. -/
abbrev conjugate (φ : K →+* ℂ) : K →+* ℂ := star φ
@[simp]
theorem conjugate_coe_eq (φ : K →+* ℂ) (x : K) : (conjugate φ) x = conj (φ x) := rfl
theorem place_conjugate (φ : K →+* ℂ) : place (conjugate φ) = place φ := by
ext; simp only [place_apply, norm_conj, conjugate_coe_eq]
/-- An embedding into `ℂ` is real if it is fixed by complex conjugation. -/
abbrev IsReal (φ : K →+* ℂ) : Prop := IsSelfAdjoint φ
theorem isReal_iff {φ : K →+* ℂ} : IsReal φ ↔ conjugate φ = φ := isSelfAdjoint_iff
theorem isReal_conjugate_iff {φ : K →+* ℂ} : IsReal (conjugate φ) ↔ IsReal φ :=
IsSelfAdjoint.star_iff
/-- A real embedding as a ring homomorphism from `K` to `ℝ` . -/
def IsReal.embedding {φ : K →+* ℂ} (hφ : IsReal φ) : K →+* ℝ where
toFun x := (φ x).re
map_one' := by simp only [map_one, one_re]
map_mul' := by
simp only [Complex.conj_eq_iff_im.mp (RingHom.congr_fun hφ _), map_mul, mul_re,
mul_zero, tsub_zero, eq_self_iff_true, forall_const]
| map_zero' := by simp only [map_zero, zero_re]
map_add' := by simp only [map_add, add_re, eq_self_iff_true, forall_const]
@[simp]
theorem IsReal.coe_embedding_apply {φ : K →+* ℂ} (hφ : IsReal φ) (x : K) :
(hφ.embedding x : ℂ) = φ x := by
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/NumberField/Embeddings.lean | 195 | 200 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Gabriel Ebner. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Gabriel Ebner, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov, Anatole Dedecker
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Add
/-!
# One-dimensional derivatives of sums etc
In this file we prove formulas about derivatives of `f + g`, `-f`, `f - g`, and `∑ i, f i x` for
functions from the base field to a normed space over this field.
For a more detailed overview of one-dimensional derivatives in mathlib, see the module docstring of
`Analysis/Calculus/Deriv/Basic`.
## Keywords
derivative
-/
universe u v w
open scoped Topology Filter ENNReal
open Asymptotics Set
variable {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {F : Type v} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {f g : 𝕜 → F}
variable {f' g' : F}
variable {x : 𝕜} {s : Set 𝕜} {L : Filter 𝕜}
section Add
/-! ### Derivative of the sum of two functions -/
nonrec theorem HasDerivAtFilter.add (hf : HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L)
(hg : HasDerivAtFilter g g' x L) : HasDerivAtFilter (fun y => f y + g y) (f' + g') x L := by
simpa using (hf.add hg).hasDerivAtFilter
nonrec theorem HasStrictDerivAt.add (hf : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasStrictDerivAt g g' x) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun y => f y + g y) (f' + g') x := by simpa using (hf.add hg).hasStrictDerivAt
nonrec theorem HasDerivWithinAt.add (hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hg : HasDerivWithinAt g g' s x) : HasDerivWithinAt (fun y => f y + g y) (f' + g') s x :=
hf.add hg
nonrec theorem HasDerivAt.add (hf : HasDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasDerivAt g g' x) :
HasDerivAt (fun x => f x + g x) (f' + g') x :=
hf.add hg
theorem derivWithin_add (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x)
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g s x) :
derivWithin (fun y => f y + g y) s x = derivWithin f s x + derivWithin g s x := by
by_cases hsx : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x
· exact (hf.hasDerivWithinAt.add hg.hasDerivWithinAt).derivWithin hsx
· simp [derivWithin_zero_of_not_uniqueDiffWithinAt hsx]
@[simp]
theorem deriv_add (hf : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g x) :
deriv (fun y => f y + g y) x = deriv f x + deriv g x :=
(hf.hasDerivAt.add hg.hasDerivAt).deriv
@[simp]
theorem hasDerivAtFilter_add_const_iff (c : F) :
HasDerivAtFilter (f · + c) f' x L ↔ HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_add_const_iff c
alias ⟨_, HasDerivAtFilter.add_const⟩ := hasDerivAtFilter_add_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_add_const_iff (c : F) :
HasStrictDerivAt (f · + c) f' x ↔ HasStrictDerivAt f f' x :=
hasStrictFDerivAt_add_const_iff c
alias ⟨_, HasStrictDerivAt.add_const⟩ := hasStrictDerivAt_add_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_add_const_iff (c : F) :
HasDerivWithinAt (f · + c) f' s x ↔ HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
hasDerivAtFilter_add_const_iff c
alias ⟨_, HasDerivWithinAt.add_const⟩ := hasDerivWithinAt_add_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem hasDerivAt_add_const_iff (c : F) : HasDerivAt (f · + c) f' x ↔ HasDerivAt f f' x :=
hasDerivAtFilter_add_const_iff c
alias ⟨_, HasDerivAt.add_const⟩ := hasDerivAt_add_const_iff
theorem derivWithin_add_const (c : F) :
derivWithin (fun y => f y + c) s x = derivWithin f s x := by
| simp only [derivWithin, fderivWithin_add_const]
theorem deriv_add_const (c : F) : deriv (fun y => f y + c) x = deriv f x := by
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/Deriv/Add.lean | 96 | 98 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Ideal
/-!
# Ideal operations for Lie algebras
Given a Lie module `M` over a Lie algebra `L`, there is a natural action of the Lie ideals of `L`
on the Lie submodules of `M`. In the special case that `M = L` with the adjoint action, this
provides a pairing of Lie ideals which is especially important. For example, it can be used to
define solvability / nilpotency of a Lie algebra via the derived / lower-central series.
## Main definitions
* `LieSubmodule.hasBracket`
* `LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span`
* `LieIdeal.map_bracket_le`
* `LieIdeal.comap_bracket_le`
## Notation
Given a Lie module `M` over a Lie algebra `L`, together with a Lie submodule `N ⊆ M` and a Lie
ideal `I ⊆ L`, we introduce the notation `⁅I, N⁆` for the Lie submodule of `M` corresponding to
the action defined in this file.
## Tags
lie algebra, ideal operation
-/
universe u v w w₁ w₂
namespace LieSubmodule
variable {R : Type u} {L : Type v} {M : Type w} {M₂ : Type w₁}
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [LieRingModule L M]
variable [AddCommGroup M₂] [Module R M₂] [LieRingModule L M₂]
variable (N N' : LieSubmodule R L M) (N₂ : LieSubmodule R L M₂)
variable (f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M₂)
section LieIdealOperations
theorem map_comap_le : map f (comap f N₂) ≤ N₂ :=
(N₂ : Set M₂).image_preimage_subset f
theorem map_comap_eq (hf : N₂ ≤ f.range) : map f (comap f N₂) = N₂ := by
rw [SetLike.ext'_iff]
exact Set.image_preimage_eq_of_subset hf
theorem le_comap_map : N ≤ comap f (map f N) :=
(N : Set M).subset_preimage_image f
theorem comap_map_eq (hf : f.ker = ⊥) : comap f (map f N) = N := by
rw [SetLike.ext'_iff]
exact (N : Set M).preimage_image_eq (f.ker_eq_bot.mp hf)
@[simp]
theorem map_comap_incl : map N.incl (comap N.incl N') = N ⊓ N' := by
rw [← toSubmodule_inj]
exact (N : Submodule R M).map_comap_subtype N'
variable [LieAlgebra R L] [LieModule R L M₂] (I J : LieIdeal R L)
/-- Given a Lie module `M` over a Lie algebra `L`, the set of Lie ideals of `L` acts on the set
of submodules of `M`. -/
instance hasBracket : Bracket (LieIdeal R L) (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨fun I N => lieSpan R L { ⁅(x : L), (n : M)⁆ | (x : I) (n : N) }⟩
theorem lieIdeal_oper_eq_span :
⁅I, N⁆ = lieSpan R L { ⁅(x : L), (n : M)⁆ | (x : I) (n : N) } :=
rfl
/-- See also `LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span'` and
`LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_tensor_map_range`. -/
theorem lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span [LieModule R L M] :
(↑⁅I, N⁆ : Submodule R M) = Submodule.span R { ⁅(x : L), (n : M)⁆ | (x : I) (n : N) } := by
apply le_antisymm
· let s := { ⁅(x : L), (n : M)⁆ | (x : I) (n : N) }
have aux : ∀ (y : L), ∀ m' ∈ Submodule.span R s, ⁅y, m'⁆ ∈ Submodule.span R s := by
intro y m' hm'
refine Submodule.span_induction (R := R) (M := M) (s := s)
(p := fun m' _ ↦ ⁅y, m'⁆ ∈ Submodule.span R s) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ hm'
· rintro m'' ⟨x, n, hm''⟩; rw [← hm'', leibniz_lie]
refine Submodule.add_mem _ ?_ ?_ <;> apply Submodule.subset_span
· use ⟨⁅y, ↑x⁆, I.lie_mem x.property⟩, n
· use x, ⟨⁅y, ↑n⁆, N.lie_mem n.property⟩
· simp only [lie_zero, Submodule.zero_mem]
· intro m₁ m₂ _ _ hm₁ hm₂; rw [lie_add]; exact Submodule.add_mem _ hm₁ hm₂
· intro t m'' _ hm''; rw [lie_smul]; exact Submodule.smul_mem _ t hm''
change _ ≤ ({ Submodule.span R s with lie_mem := fun hm' => aux _ _ hm' } : LieSubmodule R L M)
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span, lieSpan_le]
exact Submodule.subset_span
· rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span]; apply submodule_span_le_lieSpan
theorem lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span' [LieModule R L M] :
(↑⁅I, N⁆ : Submodule R M) = Submodule.span R { ⁅x, n⁆ | (x ∈ I) (n ∈ N) } := by
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span]
congr
ext m
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨n, hn⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨x, hx, n, hn, rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨x, hx, n, hn, rfl⟩
exact ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨n, hn⟩, rfl⟩
theorem lie_le_iff : ⁅I, N⁆ ≤ N' ↔ ∀ x ∈ I, ∀ m ∈ N, ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ N' := by
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span, LieSubmodule.lieSpan_le]
refine ⟨fun h x hx m hm => h ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨m, hm⟩, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
rintro h _ ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨m, hm⟩, rfl⟩
exact h x hx m hm
variable {N I} in
theorem lie_coe_mem_lie (x : I) (m : N) : ⁅(x : L), (m : M)⁆ ∈ ⁅I, N⁆ := by
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span]; apply subset_lieSpan; use x, m
variable {N I} in
theorem lie_mem_lie {x : L} {m : M} (hx : x ∈ I) (hm : m ∈ N) : ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ ⁅I, N⁆ :=
lie_coe_mem_lie ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨m, hm⟩
theorem lie_comm : ⁅I, J⁆ = ⁅J, I⁆ := by
suffices ∀ I J : LieIdeal R L, ⁅I, J⁆ ≤ ⁅J, I⁆ by exact le_antisymm (this I J) (this J I)
clear! I J; intro I J
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span, lieSpan_le]; rintro x ⟨y, z, h⟩; rw [← h]
rw [← lie_skew, ← lie_neg, ← LieSubmodule.coe_neg]
apply lie_coe_mem_lie
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/IdealOperations.lean | 131 | 131 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Paul Lezeau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Paul Lezeau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.IsPrimePow
import Mathlib.RingTheory.UniqueFactorizationDomain.Multiplicity
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.Atoms
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.Bounded
/-!
# Chains of divisors
The results in this file show that in the monoid `Associates M` of a `UniqueFactorizationMonoid`
`M`, an element `a` is an n-th prime power iff its set of divisors is a strictly increasing chain
of length `n + 1`, meaning that we can find a strictly increasing bijection between `Fin (n + 1)`
and the set of factors of `a`.
## Main results
- `DivisorChain.exists_chain_of_prime_pow` : existence of a chain for prime powers.
- `DivisorChain.is_prime_pow_of_has_chain` : elements that have a chain are prime powers.
- `multiplicity_prime_eq_multiplicity_image_by_factor_orderIso` : if there is a
monotone bijection `d` between the set of factors of `a : Associates M` and the set of factors of
`b : Associates N` then for any prime `p ∣ a`, `multiplicity p a = multiplicity (d p) b`.
- `multiplicity_eq_multiplicity_factor_dvd_iso_of_mem_normalizedFactors` : if there is a bijection
between the set of factors of `a : M` and `b : N` then for any prime `p ∣ a`,
`multiplicity p a = multiplicity (d p) b`
## TODO
- Create a structure for chains of divisors.
- Simplify proof of `mem_normalizedFactors_factor_dvd_iso_of_mem_normalizedFactors` using
`mem_normalizedFactors_factor_order_iso_of_mem_normalizedFactors` or vice versa.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
variable {M : Type*} [CancelCommMonoidWithZero M]
theorem Associates.isAtom_iff {p : Associates M} (h₁ : p ≠ 0) : IsAtom p ↔ Irreducible p :=
⟨fun hp =>
⟨by simpa only [Associates.isUnit_iff_eq_one] using hp.1, fun a b h =>
(hp.le_iff.mp ⟨_, h⟩).casesOn (fun ha => Or.inl (a.isUnit_iff_eq_one.mpr ha)) fun ha =>
Or.inr
(show IsUnit b by
rw [ha] at h
apply isUnit_of_associated_mul (show Associated (p * b) p by conv_rhs => rw [h]) h₁)⟩,
fun hp =>
⟨by simpa only [Associates.isUnit_iff_eq_one, Associates.bot_eq_one] using hp.1,
fun b ⟨⟨a, hab⟩, hb⟩ =>
(hp.isUnit_or_isUnit hab).casesOn
(fun hb => show b = ⊥ by rwa [Associates.isUnit_iff_eq_one, ← Associates.bot_eq_one] at hb)
fun ha =>
absurd
(show p ∣ b from
⟨(ha.unit⁻¹ : Units _), by rw [hab, mul_assoc, IsUnit.mul_val_inv ha, mul_one]⟩)
hb⟩⟩
open UniqueFactorizationMonoid Irreducible Associates
namespace DivisorChain
theorem exists_chain_of_prime_pow {p : Associates M} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hp : Prime p) :
∃ c : Fin (n + 1) → Associates M,
c 1 = p ∧ StrictMono c ∧ ∀ {r : Associates M}, r ≤ p ^ n ↔ ∃ i, r = c i := by
refine ⟨fun i => p ^ (i : ℕ), ?_, fun n m h => ?_, @fun y => ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩⟩
· dsimp only
rw [Fin.val_one', Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, pow_one]
exact Nat.lt_succ_of_le (Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.mpr hn)
· exact Associates.dvdNotUnit_iff_lt.mp
⟨pow_ne_zero n hp.ne_zero, p ^ (m - n : ℕ),
not_isUnit_of_not_isUnit_dvd hp.not_unit (dvd_pow dvd_rfl (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt h).ne'),
(pow_mul_pow_sub p h.le).symm⟩
· obtain ⟨i, i_le, hi⟩ := (dvd_prime_pow hp n).1 h
rw [associated_iff_eq] at hi
exact ⟨⟨i, Nat.lt_succ_of_le i_le⟩, hi⟩
· rintro ⟨i, rfl⟩
exact ⟨p ^ (n - i : ℕ), (pow_mul_pow_sub p (Nat.succ_le_succ_iff.mp i.2)).symm⟩
theorem element_of_chain_not_isUnit_of_index_ne_zero {n : ℕ} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (i_pos : i ≠ 0)
{c : Fin (n + 1) → Associates M} (h₁ : StrictMono c) : ¬IsUnit (c i) :=
DvdNotUnit.not_unit
(Associates.dvdNotUnit_iff_lt.2
(h₁ <| show (0 : Fin (n + 1)) < i from Fin.pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr i_pos))
theorem first_of_chain_isUnit {q : Associates M} {n : ℕ} {c : Fin (n + 1) → Associates M}
(h₁ : StrictMono c) (h₂ : ∀ {r}, r ≤ q ↔ ∃ i, r = c i) : IsUnit (c 0) := by
obtain ⟨i, hr⟩ := h₂.mp Associates.one_le
rw [Associates.isUnit_iff_eq_one, ← Associates.le_one_iff, hr]
exact h₁.monotone (Fin.zero_le i)
/-- The second element of a chain is irreducible. -/
theorem second_of_chain_is_irreducible {q : Associates M} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0)
{c : Fin (n + 1) → Associates M} (h₁ : StrictMono c) (h₂ : ∀ {r}, r ≤ q ↔ ∃ i, r = c i)
(hq : q ≠ 0) : Irreducible (c 1) := by
rcases n with - | n; · contradiction
refine (Associates.isAtom_iff (ne_zero_of_dvd_ne_zero hq (h₂.2 ⟨1, rfl⟩))).mp ⟨?_, fun b hb => ?_⟩
· exact ne_bot_of_gt (h₁ (show (0 : Fin (n + 2)) < 1 from Fin.one_pos))
obtain ⟨⟨i, hi⟩, rfl⟩ := h₂.1 (hb.le.trans (h₂.2 ⟨1, rfl⟩))
cases i
· exact (Associates.isUnit_iff_eq_one _).mp (first_of_chain_isUnit h₁ @h₂)
· simpa [Fin.lt_iff_val_lt_val] using h₁.lt_iff_lt.mp hb
theorem eq_second_of_chain_of_prime_dvd {p q r : Associates M} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0)
{c : Fin (n + 1) → Associates M} (h₁ : StrictMono c)
(h₂ : ∀ {r : Associates M}, r ≤ q ↔ ∃ i, r = c i) (hp : Prime p) (hr : r ∣ q) (hp' : p ∣ r) :
p = c 1 := by
rcases n with - | n
· contradiction
obtain ⟨i, rfl⟩ := h₂.1 (dvd_trans hp' hr)
refine congr_arg c (eq_of_ge_of_not_gt ?_ fun hi => ?_)
· rw [Fin.le_iff_val_le_val, Fin.val_one, Nat.succ_le_iff, ← Fin.val_zero (n.succ + 1), ←
Fin.lt_iff_val_lt_val, Fin.pos_iff_ne_zero]
rintro rfl
exact hp.not_unit (first_of_chain_isUnit h₁ @h₂)
obtain rfl | ⟨j, rfl⟩ := i.eq_zero_or_eq_succ
· cases hi
refine
not_irreducible_of_not_unit_dvdNotUnit
(DvdNotUnit.not_unit
(Associates.dvdNotUnit_iff_lt.2 (h₁ (show (0 : Fin (n + 2)) < j from ?_))))
?_ hp.irreducible
· simpa using Fin.lt_def.mp hi
· refine Associates.dvdNotUnit_iff_lt.2 (h₁ ?_)
simpa only [Fin.coe_eq_castSucc] using Fin.lt_succ
theorem card_subset_divisors_le_length_of_chain {q : Associates M} {n : ℕ}
{c : Fin (n + 1) → Associates M} (h₂ : ∀ {r}, r ≤ q ↔ ∃ i, r = c i) {m : Finset (Associates M)}
(hm : ∀ r, r ∈ m → r ≤ q) : m.card ≤ n + 1 := by
classical
have mem_image : ∀ r : Associates M, r ≤ q → r ∈ Finset.univ.image c := by
| intro r hr
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := h₂.1 hr
exact Finset.mem_image.2 ⟨i, Finset.mem_univ _, hi.symm⟩
rw [← Finset.card_fin (n + 1)]
exact (Finset.card_le_card fun x hx => mem_image x <| hm x hx).trans Finset.card_image_le
variable [UniqueFactorizationMonoid M]
theorem element_of_chain_eq_pow_second_of_chain {q r : Associates M} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0)
{c : Fin (n + 1) → Associates M} (h₁ : StrictMono c) (h₂ : ∀ {r}, r ≤ q ↔ ∃ i, r = c i)
| Mathlib/RingTheory/ChainOfDivisors.lean | 135 | 144 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Comma.Arrow
import Mathlib.Order.CompleteBooleanAlgebra
/-!
# Properties of morphisms
We provide the basic framework for talking about properties of morphisms.
The following meta-property is defined
* `RespectsLeft P Q`: `P` respects the property `Q` on the left if `P f → P (i ≫ f)` where
`i` satisfies `Q`.
* `RespectsRight P Q`: `P` respects the property `Q` on the right if `P f → P (f ≫ i)` where
`i` satisfies `Q`.
* `Respects`: `P` respects `Q` if `P` respects `Q` both on the left and on the right.
-/
universe w v v' u u'
open CategoryTheory Opposite
noncomputable section
namespace CategoryTheory
variable (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] {D : Type*} [Category D]
/-- A `MorphismProperty C` is a class of morphisms between objects in `C`. -/
def MorphismProperty :=
∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (_ : X ⟶ Y), Prop
instance : CompleteBooleanAlgebra (MorphismProperty C) where
le P₁ P₂ := ∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (f : X ⟶ Y), P₁ f → P₂ f
__ := inferInstanceAs (CompleteBooleanAlgebra (∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (_ : X ⟶ Y), Prop))
lemma MorphismProperty.le_def {P Q : MorphismProperty C} :
P ≤ Q ↔ ∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), P f → Q f := Iff.rfl
instance : Inhabited (MorphismProperty C) :=
⟨⊤⟩
lemma MorphismProperty.top_eq : (⊤ : MorphismProperty C) = fun _ _ _ => True := rfl
variable {C}
namespace MorphismProperty
@[ext]
lemma ext (W W' : MorphismProperty C) (h : ∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (f : X ⟶ Y), W f ↔ W' f) :
W = W' := by
funext X Y f
rw [h]
@[simp]
lemma top_apply {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : (⊤ : MorphismProperty C) f := by
simp only [top_eq]
lemma of_eq_top {P : MorphismProperty C} (h : P = ⊤) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : P f := by
simp [h]
@[simp]
lemma sSup_iff (S : Set (MorphismProperty C)) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
sSup S f ↔ ∃ (W : S), W.1 f := by
dsimp [sSup, iSup]
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, ⟨⟨_, ⟨⟨_, ⟨_, h⟩, rfl⟩, rfl⟩⟩, rfl⟩, hf⟩
exact ⟨⟨_, h⟩, hf⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨W, hW⟩, hf⟩
exact ⟨_, ⟨⟨_, ⟨_, ⟨⟨W, hW⟩, rfl⟩⟩, rfl⟩, rfl⟩, hf⟩
@[simp]
lemma iSup_iff {ι : Sort*} (W : ι → MorphismProperty C) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
iSup W f ↔ ∃ i, W i f := by
apply (sSup_iff (Set.range W) f).trans
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨_, i, rfl⟩, hf⟩
exact ⟨i, hf⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hf⟩
exact ⟨⟨_, i, rfl⟩, hf⟩
/-- The morphism property in `Cᵒᵖ` associated to a morphism property in `C` -/
@[simp]
def op (P : MorphismProperty C) : MorphismProperty Cᵒᵖ := fun _ _ f => P f.unop
/-- The morphism property in `C` associated to a morphism property in `Cᵒᵖ` -/
@[simp]
def unop (P : MorphismProperty Cᵒᵖ) : MorphismProperty C := fun _ _ f => P f.op
theorem unop_op (P : MorphismProperty C) : P.op.unop = P :=
rfl
theorem op_unop (P : MorphismProperty Cᵒᵖ) : P.unop.op = P :=
rfl
/-- The inverse image of a `MorphismProperty D` by a functor `C ⥤ D` -/
def inverseImage (P : MorphismProperty D) (F : C ⥤ D) : MorphismProperty C := fun _ _ f =>
P (F.map f)
@[simp]
lemma inverseImage_iff (P : MorphismProperty D) (F : C ⥤ D) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
P.inverseImage F f ↔ P (F.map f) := by rfl
/-- The image (up to isomorphisms) of a `MorphismProperty C` by a functor `C ⥤ D` -/
def map (P : MorphismProperty C) (F : C ⥤ D) : MorphismProperty D := fun _ _ f =>
∃ (X' Y' : C) (f' : X' ⟶ Y') (_ : P f'), Nonempty (Arrow.mk (F.map f') ≅ Arrow.mk f)
lemma map_mem_map (P : MorphismProperty C) (F : C ⥤ D) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (hf : P f) :
(P.map F) (F.map f) := ⟨X, Y, f, hf, ⟨Iso.refl _⟩⟩
lemma monotone_map (F : C ⥤ D) :
Monotone (map · F) := by
intro P Q h X Y f ⟨X', Y', f', hf', ⟨e⟩⟩
exact ⟨X', Y', f', h _ hf', ⟨e⟩⟩
section
variable (P : MorphismProperty C)
| /-- The set in `Set (Arrow C)` which corresponds to `P : MorphismProperty C`. -/
def toSet : Set (Arrow C) := setOf (fun f ↦ P f.hom)
/-- The family of morphisms indexed by `P.toSet` which corresponds
to `P : MorphismProperty C`, see `MorphismProperty.ofHoms_homFamily`. -/
def homFamily (f : P.toSet) : f.1.left ⟶ f.1.right := f.1.hom
lemma homFamily_apply (f : P.toSet) : P.homFamily f = f.1.hom := rfl
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/MorphismProperty/Basic.lean | 125 | 132 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Batteries.Data.List.Perm
import Mathlib.Data.List.OfFn
import Mathlib.Data.List.Nodup
import Mathlib.Data.List.TakeWhile
import Mathlib.Order.Fin.Basic
/-!
# Sorting algorithms on lists
In this file we define `List.Sorted r l` to be an alias for `List.Pairwise r l`.
This alias is preferred in the case that `r` is a `<` or `≤`-like relation.
Then we define the sorting algorithm
`List.insertionSort` and prove its correctness.
-/
open List.Perm
universe u v
namespace List
/-!
### The predicate `List.Sorted`
-/
section Sorted
variable {α : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α}
/-- `Sorted r l` is the same as `List.Pairwise r l`, preferred in the case that `r`
is a `<` or `≤`-like relation (transitive and antisymmetric or asymmetric) -/
def Sorted :=
@Pairwise
instance decidableSorted [DecidableRel r] (l : List α) : Decidable (Sorted r l) :=
List.instDecidablePairwise _
protected theorem Sorted.le_of_lt [Preorder α] {l : List α} (h : l.Sorted (· < ·)) :
l.Sorted (· ≤ ·) :=
h.imp le_of_lt
protected theorem Sorted.lt_of_le [PartialOrder α] {l : List α} (h₁ : l.Sorted (· ≤ ·))
(h₂ : l.Nodup) : l.Sorted (· < ·) :=
h₁.imp₂ (fun _ _ => lt_of_le_of_ne) h₂
protected theorem Sorted.ge_of_gt [Preorder α] {l : List α} (h : l.Sorted (· > ·)) :
l.Sorted (· ≥ ·) :=
h.imp le_of_lt
protected theorem Sorted.gt_of_ge [PartialOrder α] {l : List α} (h₁ : l.Sorted (· ≥ ·))
(h₂ : l.Nodup) : l.Sorted (· > ·) :=
h₁.imp₂ (fun _ _ => lt_of_le_of_ne) <| by simp_rw [ne_comm]; exact h₂
@[simp]
theorem sorted_nil : Sorted r [] :=
Pairwise.nil
theorem Sorted.of_cons : Sorted r (a :: l) → Sorted r l :=
Pairwise.of_cons
theorem Sorted.tail {r : α → α → Prop} {l : List α} (h : Sorted r l) : Sorted r l.tail :=
Pairwise.tail h
theorem rel_of_sorted_cons {a : α} {l : List α} : Sorted r (a :: l) → ∀ b ∈ l, r a b :=
rel_of_pairwise_cons
nonrec theorem Sorted.cons {r : α → α → Prop} [IsTrans α r] {l : List α} {a b : α}
(hab : r a b) (h : Sorted r (b :: l)) : Sorted r (a :: b :: l) :=
h.cons <| forall_mem_cons.2 ⟨hab, fun _ hx => _root_.trans hab <| rel_of_sorted_cons h _ hx⟩
theorem sorted_cons_cons {r : α → α → Prop} [IsTrans α r] {l : List α} {a b : α} :
Sorted r (b :: a :: l) ↔ r b a ∧ Sorted r (a :: l) := by
constructor
· intro h
| exact ⟨rel_of_sorted_cons h _ mem_cons_self, h.of_cons⟩
· rintro ⟨h, ha⟩
exact ha.cons h
theorem Sorted.head!_le [Inhabited α] [Preorder α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : Sorted (· < ·) l)
(ha : a ∈ l) : l.head! ≤ a := by
| Mathlib/Data/List/Sort.lean | 80 | 85 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Reid Barton. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions
/-!
# Neighborhoods and continuity relative to a subset
This file develops API on the relative versions
* `nhdsWithin` of `nhds`
* `ContinuousOn` of `Continuous`
* `ContinuousWithinAt` of `ContinuousAt`
related to continuity, which are defined in previous definition files.
Their basic properties studied in this file include the relationships between
these restricted notions and the corresponding notions for the subtype
equipped with the subspace topology.
## Notation
* `𝓝 x`: the filter of neighborhoods of a point `x`;
* `𝓟 s`: the principal filter of a set `s`;
* `𝓝[s] x`: the filter `nhdsWithin x s` of neighborhoods of a point `x` within a set `s`.
-/
open Set Filter Function Topology Filter
variable {α β γ δ : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace α]
/-!
## Properties of the neighborhood-within filter
-/
@[simp]
theorem nhds_bind_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : ((𝓝 a).bind fun x => 𝓝[s] x) = 𝓝[s] a :=
bind_inf_principal.trans <| congr_arg₂ _ nhds_bind_nhds rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 a, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] y, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x :=
Filter.ext_iff.1 nhds_bind_nhdsWithin { x | p x }
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ∈ s → p x :=
eventually_inf_principal
theorem frequently_nhdsWithin_iff {z : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] z, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝 z, p x ∧ x ∈ s :=
frequently_inf_principal.trans <| by simp only [and_comm]
theorem mem_closure_ne_iff_frequently_within {z : α} {s : Set α} :
z ∈ closure (s \ {z}) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[≠] z, x ∈ s := by
simp [mem_closure_iff_frequently, frequently_nhdsWithin_iff]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_eventually_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] a, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] y, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => (eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin.2 h).filter_mono inf_le_left⟩
simp only [eventually_nhdsWithin_iff] at h ⊢
exact h.mono fun x hx hxs => (hx hxs).self_of_nhds hxs
@[simp]
theorem eventually_mem_nhdsWithin_iff {x : α} {s t : Set α} :
(∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝[s] x, t ∈ 𝓝[s] x') ↔ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
eventually_eventually_nhdsWithin
theorem nhdsWithin_eq (a : α) (s : Set α) :
𝓝[s] a = ⨅ t ∈ { t : Set α | a ∈ t ∧ IsOpen t }, 𝓟 (t ∩ s) :=
((nhds_basis_opens a).inf_principal s).eq_biInf
@[simp] lemma nhdsWithin_univ (a : α) : 𝓝[Set.univ] a = 𝓝 a := by
rw [nhdsWithin, principal_univ, inf_top_eq]
theorem nhdsWithin_hasBasis {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} {a : α}
(h : (𝓝 a).HasBasis p s) (t : Set α) : (𝓝[t] a).HasBasis p fun i => s i ∩ t :=
h.inf_principal t
theorem nhdsWithin_basis_open (a : α) (t : Set α) :
(𝓝[t] a).HasBasis (fun u => a ∈ u ∧ IsOpen u) fun u => u ∩ t :=
nhdsWithin_hasBasis (nhds_basis_opens a) t
theorem mem_nhdsWithin {t : Set α} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] a ↔ ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ a ∈ u ∧ u ∩ s ⊆ t := by
simpa only [and_assoc, and_left_comm] using (nhdsWithin_basis_open a s).mem_iff
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter {t : Set α} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] a ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 a, u ∩ s ⊆ t :=
(nhdsWithin_hasBasis (𝓝 a).basis_sets s).mem_iff
theorem diff_mem_nhdsWithin_compl {x : α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x :=
diff_mem_inf_principal_compl hs t
theorem diff_mem_nhdsWithin_diff {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x) (t' : Set α) :
s \ t' ∈ 𝓝[t \ t'] x := by
rw [nhdsWithin, diff_eq, diff_eq, ← inf_principal, ← inf_assoc]
exact inter_mem_inf hs (mem_principal_self _)
theorem nhds_of_nhdsWithin_of_nhds {s t : Set α} {a : α} (h1 : s ∈ 𝓝 a) (h2 : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
t ∈ 𝓝 a := by
rcases mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.mp h2 with ⟨_, Hw, hw⟩
exact (𝓝 a).sets_of_superset ((𝓝 a).inter_sets Hw h1) hw
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually {s t : Set α} {x : α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] x ↔ ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, y ∈ s → y ∈ t :=
eventually_inf_principal
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventuallyEq {s t : Set α} {x : α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] x ↔ s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] (s ∩ t : Set α) := by
simp_rw [mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually, eventuallyEq_set, mem_inter_iff, iff_self_and]
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq {s t : Set α} {x : α} : 𝓝[s] x = 𝓝[t] x ↔ s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t :=
set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal.symm
theorem nhdsWithin_le_iff {s t : Set α} {x : α} : 𝓝[s] x ≤ 𝓝[t] x ↔ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le.symm.trans set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal
theorem preimage_nhdsWithin_coinduced' {π : α → β} {s : Set β} {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ t)
(hs : s ∈ @nhds β (.coinduced (fun x : t => π x) inferInstance) (π a)) :
π ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝[t] a := by
lift a to t using h
replace hs : (fun x : t => π x) ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝 a := preimage_nhds_coinduced hs
rwa [← map_nhds_subtype_val, mem_map]
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds {s t : Set α} {a : α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝 a) : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a :=
mem_inf_of_left h
theorem self_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ 𝓝[s] a :=
mem_inf_of_right (mem_principal_self s)
theorem eventually_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, x ∈ s :=
self_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem inter_mem_nhdsWithin (s : Set α) {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝 a) : s ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[s] a :=
inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin (mem_inf_of_left h)
theorem pure_le_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} (ha : a ∈ s) : pure a ≤ 𝓝[s] a :=
le_inf (pure_le_nhds a) (le_principal_iff.2 ha)
theorem mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s t : Set α} (ha : a ∈ s) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) : a ∈ t :=
pure_le_nhdsWithin ha ht
theorem Filter.Eventually.self_of_nhdsWithin {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} {x : α}
(h : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] x, p y) (hx : x ∈ s) : p x :=
mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin hx h
theorem tendsto_const_nhdsWithin {l : Filter β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (ha : a ∈ s) :
Tendsto (fun _ : β => a) l (𝓝[s] a) :=
tendsto_const_pure.mono_right <| pure_le_nhdsWithin ha
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict'' {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left (le_principal_iff.mpr (inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin h)))
(inf_le_inf_left _ (principal_mono.mpr Set.inter_subset_left))
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict' {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝 a) : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
nhdsWithin_restrict'' s <| mem_inf_of_left h
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h₀ : a ∈ t) (h₁ : IsOpen t) :
𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
nhdsWithin_restrict' s (IsOpen.mem_nhds h₁ h₀)
theorem nhdsWithin_le_of_mem {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a) : 𝓝[t] a ≤ 𝓝[s] a :=
nhdsWithin_le_iff.mpr h
theorem nhdsWithin_le_nhds {a : α} {s : Set α} : 𝓝[s] a ≤ 𝓝 a := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ]
apply nhdsWithin_le_of_mem
exact univ_mem
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin' {a : α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 a) (h₂ : t ∩ s = u ∩ s) :
𝓝[t] a = 𝓝[u] a := by rw [nhdsWithin_restrict' t hs, nhdsWithin_restrict' u hs, h₂]
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s t u : Set α} (h₀ : a ∈ s) (h₁ : IsOpen s)
(h₂ : t ∩ s = u ∩ s) : 𝓝[t] a = 𝓝[u] a := by
rw [nhdsWithin_restrict t h₀ h₁, nhdsWithin_restrict u h₀ h₁, h₂]
@[simp] theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhds {a : α} {s : Set α} : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝 a ↔ s ∈ 𝓝 a :=
inf_eq_left.trans le_principal_iff
theorem IsOpen.nhdsWithin_eq {a : α} {s : Set α} (h : IsOpen s) (ha : a ∈ s) : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝 a :=
nhdsWithin_eq_nhds.2 <| h.mem_nhds ha
theorem preimage_nhds_within_coinduced {π : α → β} {s : Set β} {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ t)
(ht : IsOpen t)
(hs : s ∈ @nhds β (.coinduced (fun x : t => π x) inferInstance) (π a)) :
π ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝 a := by
rw [← ht.nhdsWithin_eq h]
exact preimage_nhdsWithin_coinduced' h hs
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_empty (a : α) : 𝓝[∅] a = ⊥ := by rw [nhdsWithin, principal_empty, inf_bot_eq]
theorem nhdsWithin_union (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∪ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊔ 𝓝[t] a := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [← inf_sup_left, sup_principal]
theorem nhds_eq_nhdsWithin_sup_nhdsWithin (b : α) {I₁ I₂ : Set α} (hI : Set.univ = I₁ ∪ I₂) :
nhds b = nhdsWithin b I₁ ⊔ nhdsWithin b I₂ := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ b, hI, nhdsWithin_union]
/-- If `L` and `R` are neighborhoods of `b` within sets whose union is `Set.univ`, then
`L ∪ R` is a neighborhood of `b`. -/
theorem union_mem_nhds_of_mem_nhdsWithin {b : α}
{I₁ I₂ : Set α} (h : Set.univ = I₁ ∪ I₂)
{L : Set α} (hL : L ∈ nhdsWithin b I₁)
{R : Set α} (hR : R ∈ nhdsWithin b I₂) : L ∪ R ∈ nhds b := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ b, h, nhdsWithin_union]
exact ⟨mem_of_superset hL (by simp), mem_of_superset hR (by simp)⟩
/-- Writing a punctured neighborhood filter as a sup of left and right filters. -/
lemma punctured_nhds_eq_nhdsWithin_sup_nhdsWithin [LinearOrder α] {x : α} :
𝓝[≠] x = 𝓝[<] x ⊔ 𝓝[>] x := by
rw [← Iio_union_Ioi, nhdsWithin_union]
/-- Obtain a "predictably-sided" neighborhood of `b` from two one-sided neighborhoods. -/
theorem nhds_of_Ici_Iic [LinearOrder α] {b : α}
{L : Set α} (hL : L ∈ 𝓝[≤] b)
{R : Set α} (hR : R ∈ 𝓝[≥] b) : L ∩ Iic b ∪ R ∩ Ici b ∈ 𝓝 b :=
union_mem_nhds_of_mem_nhdsWithin Iic_union_Ici.symm
(inter_mem hL self_mem_nhdsWithin) (inter_mem hR self_mem_nhdsWithin)
theorem nhdsWithin_biUnion {ι} {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) (s : ι → Set α) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃ i ∈ I, s i] a = ⨆ i ∈ I, 𝓝[s i] a := by
induction I, hI using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert _ _ hT => simp only [hT, nhdsWithin_union, iSup_insert, biUnion_insert]
theorem nhdsWithin_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hS : S.Finite) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃₀ S] a = ⨆ s ∈ S, 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, nhdsWithin_biUnion hS]
theorem nhdsWithin_iUnion {ι} [Finite ι] (s : ι → Set α) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃ i, s i] a = ⨆ i, 𝓝[s i] a := by
rw [← sUnion_range, nhdsWithin_sUnion (finite_range s), iSup_range]
theorem nhdsWithin_inter (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊓ 𝓝[t] a := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [inf_left_comm, inf_assoc, inf_principal, ← inf_assoc, inf_idem]
theorem nhdsWithin_inter' (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊓ 𝓟 t := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [← inf_principal, inf_assoc]
theorem nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[t] a := by
rw [nhdsWithin_inter, inf_eq_right]
exact nhdsWithin_le_of_mem h
theorem nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem' {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [inter_comm, nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem h]
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_singleton (a : α) : 𝓝[{a}] a = pure a := by
rw [nhdsWithin, principal_singleton, inf_eq_right.2 (pure_le_nhds a)]
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) : 𝓝[insert a s] a = pure a ⊔ 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [← singleton_union, nhdsWithin_union, nhdsWithin_singleton]
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_insert {a : α} {s t : Set α} : t ∈ 𝓝[insert a s] a ↔ a ∈ t ∧ t ∈ 𝓝[s] a := by
simp
theorem insert_mem_nhdsWithin_insert {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
insert a t ∈ 𝓝[insert a s] a := by simp [mem_of_superset h]
theorem insert_mem_nhds_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} : insert a s ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ s ∈ 𝓝[≠] a := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, mem_inf_principal, mem_compl_iff, mem_singleton_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left,
insert_def]
@[simp]
theorem nhdsNE_sup_pure (a : α) : 𝓝[≠] a ⊔ pure a = 𝓝 a := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_singleton, ← nhdsWithin_union, compl_union_self, nhdsWithin_univ]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-02")]
alias nhdsWithin_compl_singleton_sup_pure := nhdsNE_sup_pure
@[simp]
theorem pure_sup_nhdsNE (a : α) : pure a ⊔ 𝓝[≠] a = 𝓝 a := by rw [← sup_comm, nhdsNE_sup_pure]
theorem nhdsWithin_prod [TopologicalSpace β]
{s u : Set α} {t v : Set β} {a : α} {b : β} (hu : u ∈ 𝓝[s] a) (hv : v ∈ 𝓝[t] b) :
u ×ˢ v ∈ 𝓝[s ×ˢ t] (a, b) := by
rw [nhdsWithin_prod_eq]
exact prod_mem_prod hu hv
lemma Filter.EventuallyEq.mem_interior {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hst : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t)
(h : x ∈ interior s) : x ∈ interior t := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq] at hst
simpa [mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, ← nhdsWithin_eq_nhds, hst] using h
lemma Filter.EventuallyEq.mem_interior_iff {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hst : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
x ∈ interior s ↔ x ∈ interior t :=
⟨fun h ↦ hst.mem_interior h, fun h ↦ hst.symm.mem_interior h⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-11")]
alias EventuallyEq.mem_interior_iff := Filter.EventuallyEq.mem_interior_iff
section Pi
variable {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)]
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_eq' {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) (s : ∀ i, Set (π i)) (x : ∀ i, π i) :
𝓝[pi I s] x = ⨅ i, comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝 (x i) ⊓ ⨅ (_ : i ∈ I), 𝓟 (s i)) := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_pi, Filter.pi, comap_inf, comap_iInf, pi_def, comap_principal, ←
iInf_principal_finite hI, ← iInf_inf_eq]
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_eq {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) (s : ∀ i, Set (π i)) (x : ∀ i, π i) :
𝓝[pi I s] x =
(⨅ i ∈ I, comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝[s i] x i)) ⊓
⨅ (i) (_ : i ∉ I), comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝 (x i)) := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_pi, Filter.pi, pi_def, ← iInf_principal_finite hI, comap_inf,
comap_principal, eval]
rw [iInf_split _ fun i => i ∈ I, inf_right_comm]
simp only [iInf_inf_eq]
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_univ_eq [Finite ι] (s : ∀ i, Set (π i)) (x : ∀ i, π i) :
𝓝[pi univ s] x = ⨅ i, comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝[s i] x i) := by
simpa [nhdsWithin] using nhdsWithin_pi_eq finite_univ s x
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_eq_bot {I : Set ι} {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} {x : ∀ i, π i} :
𝓝[pi I s] x = ⊥ ↔ ∃ i ∈ I, 𝓝[s i] x i = ⊥ := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_pi, pi_inf_principal_pi_eq_bot]
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_neBot {I : Set ι} {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} {x : ∀ i, π i} :
(𝓝[pi I s] x).NeBot ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, (𝓝[s i] x i).NeBot := by
simp [neBot_iff, nhdsWithin_pi_eq_bot]
instance instNeBotNhdsWithinUnivPi {s : ∀ i, Set (π i)} {x : ∀ i, π i}
[∀ i, (𝓝[s i] x i).NeBot] : (𝓝[pi univ s] x).NeBot := by
simpa [nhdsWithin_pi_neBot]
instance Pi.instNeBotNhdsWithinIio [Nonempty ι] [∀ i, Preorder (π i)] {x : ∀ i, π i}
[∀ i, (𝓝[<] x i).NeBot] : (𝓝[<] x).NeBot :=
have : (𝓝[pi univ fun i ↦ Iio (x i)] x).NeBot := inferInstance
this.mono <| nhdsWithin_mono _ fun _y hy ↦ lt_of_strongLT fun i ↦ hy i trivial
instance Pi.instNeBotNhdsWithinIoi [Nonempty ι] [∀ i, Preorder (π i)] {x : ∀ i, π i}
[∀ i, (𝓝[>] x i).NeBot] : (𝓝[>] x).NeBot :=
Pi.instNeBotNhdsWithinIio (π := fun i ↦ (π i)ᵒᵈ) (x := fun i ↦ OrderDual.toDual (x i))
end Pi
theorem Filter.Tendsto.piecewise_nhdsWithin {f g : α → β} {t : Set α} [∀ x, Decidable (x ∈ t)]
{a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β} (h₀ : Tendsto f (𝓝[s ∩ t] a) l)
(h₁ : Tendsto g (𝓝[s ∩ tᶜ] a) l) : Tendsto (piecewise t f g) (𝓝[s] a) l := by
apply Tendsto.piecewise <;> rwa [← nhdsWithin_inter']
theorem Filter.Tendsto.if_nhdsWithin {f g : α → β} {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {a : α}
{s : Set α} {l : Filter β} (h₀ : Tendsto f (𝓝[s ∩ { x | p x }] a) l)
(h₁ : Tendsto g (𝓝[s ∩ { x | ¬p x }] a) l) :
Tendsto (fun x => if p x then f x else g x) (𝓝[s] a) l :=
h₀.piecewise_nhdsWithin h₁
theorem map_nhdsWithin (f : α → β) (a : α) (s : Set α) :
map f (𝓝[s] a) = ⨅ t ∈ { t : Set α | a ∈ t ∧ IsOpen t }, 𝓟 (f '' (t ∩ s)) :=
((nhdsWithin_basis_open a s).map f).eq_biInf
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_mono_left {f : α → β} {a : α} {s t : Set α} {l : Filter β} (hst : s ⊆ t)
(h : Tendsto f (𝓝[t] a) l) : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l :=
h.mono_left <| nhdsWithin_mono a hst
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_mono_right {f : β → α} {l : Filter β} {a : α} {s t : Set α} (hst : s ⊆ t)
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a)) : Tendsto f l (𝓝[t] a) :=
h.mono_right (nhdsWithin_mono a hst)
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β}
(h : Tendsto f (𝓝 a) l) : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l :=
h.mono_left inf_le_left
theorem eventually_mem_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin {f : β → α} {a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a)) : ∀ᶠ i in l, f i ∈ s := by
simp_rw [nhdsWithin_eq, tendsto_iInf, mem_setOf_eq, tendsto_principal, mem_inter_iff,
eventually_and] at h
exact (h univ ⟨mem_univ a, isOpen_univ⟩).2
theorem tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin {f : β → α} {a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a)) : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) :=
h.mono_right nhdsWithin_le_nhds
theorem nhdsWithin_neBot_of_mem {s : Set α} {x : α} (hx : x ∈ s) : NeBot (𝓝[s] x) :=
mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot.1 <| subset_closure hx
theorem IsClosed.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot {s : Set α} (hs : IsClosed s) {x : α}
(hx : NeBot <| 𝓝[s] x) : x ∈ s :=
hs.closure_eq ▸ mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot.2 hx
theorem DenseRange.nhdsWithin_neBot {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α} (h : DenseRange f) (x : α) :
NeBot (𝓝[range f] x) :=
mem_closure_iff_clusterPt.1 (h x)
theorem mem_closure_pi {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] {I : Set ι}
{s : ∀ i, Set (α i)} {x : ∀ i, α i} : x ∈ closure (pi I s) ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, x i ∈ closure (s i) := by
simp only [mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot, nhdsWithin_pi_neBot]
theorem closure_pi_set {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] (I : Set ι)
(s : ∀ i, Set (α i)) : closure (pi I s) = pi I fun i => closure (s i) :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_closure_pi
theorem dense_pi {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] {s : ∀ i, Set (α i)}
(I : Set ι) (hs : ∀ i ∈ I, Dense (s i)) : Dense (pi I s) := by
simp only [dense_iff_closure_eq, closure_pi_set, pi_congr rfl fun i hi => (hs i hi).closure_eq,
pi_univ]
theorem DenseRange.piMap {ι : Type*} {X Y : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
{f : (i : ι) → (X i) → (Y i)} (hf : ∀ i, DenseRange (f i)):
DenseRange (Pi.map f) := by
rw [DenseRange, Set.range_piMap]
exact dense_pi Set.univ (fun i _ => hf i)
theorem eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_iff {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} :
f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
mem_inf_principal
/-- Two functions agree on a neighborhood of `x` if they agree at `x` and in a punctured
neighborhood. -/
theorem eventuallyEq_nhds_of_eventuallyEq_nhdsNE {f g : α → β} {a : α} (h₁ : f =ᶠ[𝓝[≠] a] g)
(h₂ : f a = g a) :
f =ᶠ[𝓝 a] g := by
filter_upwards [eventually_nhdsWithin_iff.1 h₁]
intro x hx
by_cases h₂x : x = a
· simp [h₂x, h₂]
· tauto
theorem eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_of_eqOn {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g :=
mem_inf_of_right h
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g :=
eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_of_eqOn h
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} {l : Filter β}
(hfg : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = g x) (hf : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l) : Tendsto g (𝓝[s] a) l :=
(tendsto_congr' <| eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_of_eqOn hfg).1 hf
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_of_forall {s : Set α} {a : α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) :
∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x :=
mem_inf_of_right h
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within {a : α} {l : Filter β} {s : Set α}
(f : β → α) (h1 : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) (h2 : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ∈ s) : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨h1, tendsto_principal.2 h2⟩
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff {a : α} {l : Filter β} {s : Set α} {f : β → α} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a) ↔ Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) ∧ ∀ᶠ n in l, f n ∈ s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin h, eventually_mem_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin h⟩, fun h =>
tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within _ h.1 h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_range {a : α} {l : Filter β} {f : β → α} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝[range f] a) ↔ Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) :=
⟨fun h => h.mono_right inf_le_left, fun h =>
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨h, tendsto_principal.2 <| Eventually.of_forall mem_range_self⟩⟩
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.eq_of_nhdsWithin {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} {a : α} (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g)
(hmem : a ∈ s) : f a = g a :=
h.self_of_nhdsWithin hmem
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_of_eventually_nhds {s : Set α}
{a : α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x :=
mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds h
lemma Set.MapsTo.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {x : α}
(hst : MapsTo f s t) : f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
Filter.mem_of_superset self_mem_nhdsWithin hst
/-!
### `nhdsWithin` and subtypes
-/
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_subtype {s : Set α} {a : { x // x ∈ s }} {t u : Set { x // x ∈ s }} :
t ∈ 𝓝[u] a ↔ t ∈ comap ((↑) : s → α) (𝓝[(↑) '' u] a) := by
rw [nhdsWithin, nhds_subtype, principal_subtype, ← comap_inf, ← nhdsWithin]
theorem nhdsWithin_subtype (s : Set α) (a : { x // x ∈ s }) (t : Set { x // x ∈ s }) :
𝓝[t] a = comap ((↑) : s → α) (𝓝[(↑) '' t] a) :=
Filter.ext fun _ => mem_nhdsWithin_subtype
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_map_subtype_coe {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) :
𝓝[s] a = map ((↑) : s → α) (𝓝 ⟨a, h⟩) :=
(map_nhds_subtype_val ⟨a, h⟩).symm
theorem mem_nhds_subtype_iff_nhdsWithin {s : Set α} {a : s} {t : Set s} :
t ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ (↑) '' t ∈ 𝓝[s] (a : α) := by
rw [← map_nhds_subtype_val, image_mem_map_iff Subtype.val_injective]
theorem preimage_coe_mem_nhds_subtype {s t : Set α} {a : s} : (↑) ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ t ∈ 𝓝[s] ↑a := by
rw [← map_nhds_subtype_val, mem_map]
theorem eventually_nhds_subtype_iff (s : Set α) (a : s) (P : α → Prop) :
(∀ᶠ x : s in 𝓝 a, P x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, P x :=
preimage_coe_mem_nhds_subtype
theorem frequently_nhds_subtype_iff (s : Set α) (a : s) (P : α → Prop) :
(∃ᶠ x : s in 𝓝 a, P x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, P x :=
eventually_nhds_subtype_iff s a (¬ P ·) |>.not
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff_subtype {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) (f : α → β) (l : Filter β) :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l ↔ Tendsto (s.restrict f) (𝓝 ⟨a, h⟩) l := by
rw [nhdsWithin_eq_map_subtype_coe h, tendsto_map'_iff]; rfl
/-!
## Local continuity properties of functions
-/
variable [TopologicalSpace β] [TopologicalSpace γ] [TopologicalSpace δ]
{f g : α → β} {s s' s₁ t : Set α} {x : α}
/-!
### `ContinuousWithinAt`
-/
/-- If a function is continuous within `s` at `x`, then it tends to `f x` within `s` by definition.
We register this fact for use with the dot notation, especially to use `Filter.Tendsto.comp` as
`ContinuousWithinAt.comp` will have a different meaning. -/
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝 (f x)) :=
h
theorem continuousWithinAt_univ (f : α → β) (x : α) :
ContinuousWithinAt f Set.univ x ↔ ContinuousAt f x := by
rw [ContinuousAt, ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_univ]
theorem continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ {f : α → β} : Continuous f ↔ ContinuousOn f univ := by
simp [continuous_iff_continuousAt, ContinuousOn, ContinuousAt, ContinuousWithinAt,
nhdsWithin_univ]
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt_restrict (f : α → β) {x : α} {s : Set α} (h : x ∈ s) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousAt (s.restrict f) ⟨x, h⟩ :=
tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff_subtype h f _
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin {t : Set β}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (ht : MapsTo f s t) :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝[t] f x) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨h, tendsto_principal.2 <| mem_inf_of_right <| mem_principal.2 <| ht⟩
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin_image (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝[f '' s] f x) :=
h.tendsto_nhdsWithin (mapsTo_image _ _)
theorem nhdsWithin_le_comap (ctsf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
𝓝[s] x ≤ comap f (𝓝[f '' s] f x) :=
ctsf.tendsto_nhdsWithin_image.le_comap
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin {t : Set β}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 (f x)) : f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
h ht
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin' {t : Set β}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[f '' s] f x) : f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
h.tendsto_nhdsWithin (mapsTo_image _ _) ht
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin'' {y : β} {s t : Set β}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f (f ⁻¹' s) x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] y) (hxy : y = f x) :
f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[f ⁻¹' s] x := by
rw [hxy] at ht
exact h.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin' (nhdsWithin_mono _ (image_preimage_subset f s) ht)
theorem continuousWithinAt_of_not_mem_closure (hx : x ∉ closure s) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x := by
rw [mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot, not_neBot] at hx
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, hx]
exact tendsto_bot
/-!
### `ContinuousOn`
-/
theorem continuousOn_iff :
ContinuousOn f s ↔
∀ x ∈ s, ∀ t : Set β, IsOpen t → f x ∈ t → ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ x ∈ u ∧ u ∩ s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t := by
simp only [ContinuousOn, ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhds, mem_nhdsWithin]
theorem ContinuousOn.continuousWithinAt (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
hf x hx
theorem continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ Continuous (s.restrict f) := by
rw [ContinuousOn, continuous_iff_continuousAt]; constructor
· rintro h ⟨x, xs⟩
exact (continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt_restrict f xs).mp (h x xs)
intro h x xs
exact (continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt_restrict f xs).mpr (h ⟨x, xs⟩)
alias ⟨ContinuousOn.restrict, _⟩ := continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict
theorem ContinuousOn.restrict_mapsTo {t : Set β} (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (ht : MapsTo f s t) :
Continuous (ht.restrict f s t) :=
hf.restrict.codRestrict _
theorem continuousOn_iff' :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ t : Set β, IsOpen t → ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s := by
have : ∀ t, IsOpen (s.restrict f ⁻¹' t) ↔ ∃ u : Set α, IsOpen u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s := by
intro t
rw [isOpen_induced_iff, Set.restrict_eq, Set.preimage_comp]
simp only [Subtype.preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff]
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨u, ou, useq⟩
exact ⟨u, ou, by simpa only [Set.inter_comm, eq_comm] using useq⟩
rw [continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict, continuous_def]; simp only [this]
/-- If a function is continuous on a set for some topologies, then it is
continuous on the same set with respect to any finer topology on the source space. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.mono_dom {α β : Type*} {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₃ : TopologicalSpace β}
(h₁ : t₂ ≤ t₁) {s : Set α} {f : α → β} (h₂ : @ContinuousOn α β t₁ t₃ f s) :
@ContinuousOn α β t₂ t₃ f s := fun x hx _u hu =>
map_mono (inf_le_inf_right _ <| nhds_mono h₁) (h₂ x hx hu)
/-- If a function is continuous on a set for some topologies, then it is
continuous on the same set with respect to any coarser topology on the target space. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.mono_rng {α β : Type*} {t₁ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₂ t₃ : TopologicalSpace β}
(h₁ : t₂ ≤ t₃) {s : Set α} {f : α → β} (h₂ : @ContinuousOn α β t₁ t₂ f s) :
@ContinuousOn α β t₁ t₃ f s := fun x hx _u hu =>
h₂ x hx <| nhds_mono h₁ hu
theorem continuousOn_iff_isClosed :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ t : Set β, IsClosed t → ∃ u, IsClosed u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s := by
have : ∀ t, IsClosed (s.restrict f ⁻¹' t) ↔ ∃ u : Set α, IsClosed u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s := by
intro t
rw [isClosed_induced_iff, Set.restrict_eq, Set.preimage_comp]
simp only [Subtype.preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff, eq_comm, Set.inter_comm s]
rw [continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict, continuous_iff_isClosed]; simp only [this]
theorem continuous_of_cover_nhds {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set α}
(hs : ∀ x : α, ∃ i, s i ∈ 𝓝 x) (hf : ∀ i, ContinuousOn f (s i)) :
Continuous f :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.mpr fun x ↦ let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hs x; by
rw [ContinuousAt, ← nhdsWithin_eq_nhds.2 hi]
exact hf _ _ (mem_of_mem_nhds hi)
@[simp] theorem continuousOn_empty (f : α → β) : ContinuousOn f ∅ := fun _ => False.elim
@[simp]
theorem continuousOn_singleton (f : α → β) (a : α) : ContinuousOn f {a} :=
forall_eq.2 <| by
simpa only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_singleton, tendsto_pure_left] using fun s =>
mem_of_mem_nhds
theorem Set.Subsingleton.continuousOn {s : Set α} (hs : s.Subsingleton) (f : α → β) :
ContinuousOn f s :=
| hs.induction_on (continuousOn_empty f) (continuousOn_singleton f)
theorem continuousOn_open_iff (hs : IsOpen s) :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ t, IsOpen t → IsOpen (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) := by
| Mathlib/Topology/ContinuousOn.lean | 650 | 653 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kexing Ying and Kevin Buzzard. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying, Kevin Buzzard, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.GroupWithZero.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.FiniteSupport
import Mathlib.Algebra.NoZeroSMulDivisors.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
/-!
# Finite products and sums over types and sets
We define products and sums over types and subsets of types, with no finiteness hypotheses.
All infinite products and sums are defined to be junk values (i.e. one or zero).
This approach is sometimes easier to use than `Finset.sum`,
when issues arise with `Finset` and `Fintype` being data.
## Main definitions
We use the following variables:
* `α`, `β` - types with no structure;
* `s`, `t` - sets
* `M`, `N` - additive or multiplicative commutative monoids
* `f`, `g` - functions
Definitions in this file:
* `finsum f : M` : the sum of `f x` as `x` ranges over the support of `f`, if it's finite.
Zero otherwise.
* `finprod f : M` : the product of `f x` as `x` ranges over the multiplicative support of `f`, if
it's finite. One otherwise.
## Notation
* `∑ᶠ i, f i` and `∑ᶠ i : α, f i` for `finsum f`
* `∏ᶠ i, f i` and `∏ᶠ i : α, f i` for `finprod f`
This notation works for functions `f : p → M`, where `p : Prop`, so the following works:
* `∑ᶠ i ∈ s, f i`, where `f : α → M`, `s : Set α` : sum over the set `s`;
* `∑ᶠ n < 5, f n`, where `f : ℕ → M` : same as `f 0 + f 1 + f 2 + f 3 + f 4`;
* `∏ᶠ (n >= -2) (hn : n < 3), f n`, where `f : ℤ → M` : same as `f (-2) * f (-1) * f 0 * f 1 * f 2`.
## Implementation notes
`finsum` and `finprod` is "yet another way of doing finite sums and products in Lean". However
experiments in the wild (e.g. with matroids) indicate that it is a helpful approach in settings
where the user is not interested in computability and wants to do reasoning without running into
typeclass diamonds caused by the constructive finiteness used in definitions such as `Finset` and
`Fintype`. By sticking solely to `Set.Finite` we avoid these problems. We are aware that there are
other solutions but for beginner mathematicians this approach is easier in practice.
Another application is the construction of a partition of unity from a collection of “bump”
function. In this case the finite set depends on the point and it's convenient to have a definition
that does not mention the set explicitly.
The first arguments in all definitions and lemmas is the codomain of the function of the big
operator. This is necessary for the heuristic in `@[to_additive]`.
See the documentation of `to_additive.attr` for more information.
We did not add `IsFinite (X : Type) : Prop`, because it is simply `Nonempty (Fintype X)`.
## Tags
finsum, finprod, finite sum, finite product
-/
open Function Set
/-!
### Definition and relation to `Finset.sum` and `Finset.prod`
-/
-- Porting note: Used to be section Sort
section sort
variable {G M N : Type*} {α β ι : Sort*} [CommMonoid M] [CommMonoid N]
section
/- Note: we use classical logic only for these definitions, to ensure that we do not write lemmas
with `Classical.dec` in their statement. -/
open Classical in
/-- Sum of `f x` as `x` ranges over the elements of the support of `f`, if it's finite. Zero
otherwise. -/
noncomputable irreducible_def finsum (lemma := finsum_def') [AddCommMonoid M] (f : α → M) : M :=
if h : (support (f ∘ PLift.down)).Finite then ∑ i ∈ h.toFinset, f i.down else 0
open Classical in
/-- Product of `f x` as `x` ranges over the elements of the multiplicative support of `f`, if it's
finite. One otherwise. -/
@[to_additive existing]
noncomputable irreducible_def finprod (lemma := finprod_def') (f : α → M) : M :=
if h : (mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down)).Finite then ∏ i ∈ h.toFinset, f i.down else 1
attribute [to_additive existing] finprod_def'
end
open Batteries.ExtendedBinder
/-- `∑ᶠ x, f x` is notation for `finsum f`. It is the sum of `f x`, where `x` ranges over the
support of `f`, if it's finite, zero otherwise. Taking the sum over multiple arguments or
conditions is possible, e.g. `∏ᶠ (x) (y), f x y` and `∏ᶠ (x) (h: x ∈ s), f x` -/
notation3"∑ᶠ "(...)", "r:67:(scoped f => finsum f) => r
/-- `∏ᶠ x, f x` is notation for `finprod f`. It is the product of `f x`, where `x` ranges over the
multiplicative support of `f`, if it's finite, one otherwise. Taking the product over multiple
arguments or conditions is possible, e.g. `∏ᶠ (x) (y), f x y` and `∏ᶠ (x) (h: x ∈ s), f x` -/
notation3"∏ᶠ "(...)", "r:67:(scoped f => finprod f) => r
-- Porting note: The following ports the lean3 notation for this file, but is currently very fickle.
-- syntax (name := bigfinsum) "∑ᶠ" extBinders ", " term:67 : term
-- macro_rules (kind := bigfinsum)
-- | `(∑ᶠ $x:ident, $p) => `(finsum (fun $x:ident ↦ $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ $x:ident : $t, $p) => `(finsum (fun $x:ident : $t ↦ $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ $x:ident $b:binderPred, $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum (α := satisfies_binder_pred% $x $b) (fun _ => $p)))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun ($x) => finsum (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident : $_) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun ($x) => finsum (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => (finsum (α := $t) fun $h => $p)))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => (finsum fun $z => $p)))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => (finsum fun $z => (finsum (α := $t) fun $h => $p))))
--
--
-- syntax (name := bigfinprod) "∏ᶠ " extBinders ", " term:67 : term
-- macro_rules (kind := bigfinprod)
-- | `(∏ᶠ $x:ident, $p) => `(finprod (fun $x:ident ↦ $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ $x:ident : $t, $p) => `(finprod (fun $x:ident : $t ↦ $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ $x:ident $b:binderPred, $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod (α := satisfies_binder_pred% $x $b) (fun _ => $p)))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun ($x) => finprod (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident : $_) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun ($x) => finprod (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => (finprod (α := $t) fun $h => $p)))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => (finprod fun $z => $p)))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => (finprod fun $z =>
-- (finprod (α := $t) fun $h => $p))))
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset {f : α → M}
(hf : (mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down)).Finite) {s : Finset (PLift α)} (hs : hf.toFinset ⊆ s) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i.down := by
rw [finprod, dif_pos]
refine Finset.prod_subset hs fun x _ hxf => ?_
rwa [hf.mem_toFinset, nmem_mulSupport] at hxf
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset {f : α → M} {s : Finset (PLift α)}
(hs : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) ⊆ s) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i.down :=
finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset (s.finite_toSet.subset hs) fun x hx => by
rw [Finite.mem_toFinset] at hx
exact hs hx
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_one : (∏ᶠ _ : α, (1 : M)) = 1 := by
have : (mulSupport fun x : PLift α => (fun _ => 1 : α → M) x.down) ⊆ (∅ : Finset (PLift α)) :=
fun x h => by simp at h
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset this, Finset.prod_empty]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 := by
rw [← finprod_one]
congr
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_false (f : False → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 :=
finprod_of_isEmpty _
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_single (f : α → M) (a : α) (ha : ∀ x, x ≠ a → f x = 1) :
∏ᶠ x, f x = f a := by
have : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) ⊆ ({PLift.up a} : Finset (PLift α)) := by
intro x
contrapose
simpa [PLift.eq_up_iff_down_eq] using ha x.down
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset this, Finset.prod_singleton]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_unique [Unique α] (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = f default :=
finprod_eq_single f default fun _x hx => (hx <| Unique.eq_default _).elim
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_true (f : True → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = f trivial :=
@finprod_unique M True _ ⟨⟨trivial⟩, fun _ => rfl⟩ f
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (f : p → M) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = if h : p then f h else 1 := by
split_ifs with h
· haveI : Unique p := ⟨⟨h⟩, fun _ => rfl⟩
exact finprod_unique f
· haveI : IsEmpty p := ⟨h⟩
exact finprod_of_isEmpty f
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] {x : M} : ∏ᶠ _ : p, x = if p then x else 1 :=
finprod_eq_dif fun _ => x
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_congr {f g : α → M} (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : finprod f = finprod g :=
congr_arg _ <| funext h
@[to_additive (attr := congr)]
theorem finprod_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f : p → M} {g : q → M} (hpq : p = q)
(hfg : ∀ h : q, f (hpq.mpr h) = g h) : finprod f = finprod g := by
subst q
exact finprod_congr hfg
/-- To prove a property of a finite product, it suffices to prove that the property is
multiplicative and holds on the factors. -/
@[to_additive
"To prove a property of a finite sum, it suffices to prove that the property is
additive and holds on the summands."]
theorem finprod_induction {f : α → M} (p : M → Prop) (hp₀ : p 1)
(hp₁ : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x * y)) (hp₂ : ∀ i, p (f i)) : p (∏ᶠ i, f i) := by
rw [finprod]
split_ifs
exacts [Finset.prod_induction _ _ hp₁ hp₀ fun i _ => hp₂ _, hp₀]
theorem finprod_nonneg {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]
{f : α → R} (hf : ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x) :
0 ≤ ∏ᶠ x, f x :=
finprod_induction (fun x => 0 ≤ x) zero_le_one (fun _ _ => mul_nonneg) hf
@[to_additive finsum_nonneg]
theorem one_le_finprod' {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [PartialOrder M] [IsOrderedMonoid M]
{f : α → M} (hf : ∀ i, 1 ≤ f i) :
1 ≤ ∏ᶠ i, f i :=
finprod_induction _ le_rfl (fun _ _ => one_le_mul) hf
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_plift (f : M →* N) (g : α → M)
(h : (mulSupport <| g ∘ PLift.down).Finite) : f (∏ᶠ x, g x) = ∏ᶠ x, f (g x) := by
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset h.coe_toFinset.ge,
finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset, map_prod]
rw [h.coe_toFinset]
exact mulSupport_comp_subset f.map_one (g ∘ PLift.down)
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_Prop {p : Prop} (f : M →* N) (g : p → M) :
f (∏ᶠ x, g x) = ∏ᶠ x, f (g x) :=
f.map_finprod_plift g (Set.toFinite _)
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_of_preimage_one (f : M →* N) (hf : ∀ x, f x = 1 → x = 1) (g : α → M) :
f (∏ᶠ i, g i) = ∏ᶠ i, f (g i) := by
by_cases hg : (mulSupport <| g ∘ PLift.down).Finite; · exact f.map_finprod_plift g hg
rw [finprod, dif_neg, f.map_one, finprod, dif_neg]
exacts [Infinite.mono (fun x hx => mt (hf (g x.down)) hx) hg, hg]
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_of_injective (g : M →* N) (hg : Injective g) (f : α → M) :
g (∏ᶠ i, f i) = ∏ᶠ i, g (f i) :=
g.map_finprod_of_preimage_one (fun _ => (hg.eq_iff' g.map_one).mp) f
@[to_additive]
theorem MulEquiv.map_finprod (g : M ≃* N) (f : α → M) : g (∏ᶠ i, f i) = ∏ᶠ i, g (f i) :=
g.toMonoidHom.map_finprod_of_injective (EquivLike.injective g) f
@[to_additive]
theorem MulEquivClass.map_finprod {F : Type*} [EquivLike F M N] [MulEquivClass F M N] (g : F)
(f : α → M) : g (∏ᶠ i, f i) = ∏ᶠ i, g (f i) :=
MulEquiv.map_finprod (MulEquivClass.toMulEquiv g) f
/-- The `NoZeroSMulDivisors` makes sure that the result holds even when the support of `f` is
infinite. For a more usual version assuming `(support f).Finite` instead, see `finsum_smul'`. -/
theorem finsum_smul {R M : Type*} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M]
(f : ι → R) (x : M) : (∑ᶠ i, f i) • x = ∑ᶠ i, f i • x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
· exact ((smulAddHom R M).flip x).map_finsum_of_injective (smul_left_injective R hx) _
/-- The `NoZeroSMulDivisors` makes sure that the result holds even when the support of `f` is
infinite. For a more usual version assuming `(support f).Finite` instead, see `smul_finsum'`. -/
theorem smul_finsum {R M : Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors R M] (c : R) (f : ι → M) : (c • ∑ᶠ i, f i) = ∑ᶠ i, c • f i := by
rcases eq_or_ne c 0 with (rfl | hc)
· simp
· exact (smulAddHom R M c).map_finsum_of_injective (smul_right_injective M hc) _
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_inv_distrib [DivisionCommMonoid G] (f : α → G) : (∏ᶠ x, (f x)⁻¹) = (∏ᶠ x, f x)⁻¹ :=
((MulEquiv.inv G).map_finprod f).symm
end sort
-- Porting note: Used to be section Type
section type
variable {α β ι G M N : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [CommMonoid N]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_mulIndicator_apply (s : Set α) (f : α → M) (a : α) :
∏ᶠ _ : a ∈ s, f a = mulIndicator s f a := by
classical convert finprod_eq_if (M := M) (p := a ∈ s) (x := f a)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_apply_ne_one (f : α → M) (a : α) : ∏ᶠ _ : f a ≠ 1, f a = f a := by
rw [← mem_mulSupport, finprod_eq_mulIndicator_apply, mulIndicator_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_def (s : Set α) (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ a ∈ s, f a = ∏ᶠ a, mulIndicator s f a :=
finprod_congr <| finprod_eq_mulIndicator_apply s f
@[to_additive]
lemma finprod_mem_mulSupport (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ a ∈ mulSupport f, f a = ∏ᶠ a, f a := by
rw [finprod_mem_def, mulIndicator_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset (f : α → M) {s : Finset α} (h : mulSupport f ⊆ s) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i := by
have A : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) = Equiv.plift.symm '' mulSupport f := by
rw [mulSupport_comp_eq_preimage]
exact (Equiv.plift.symm.image_eq_preimage _).symm
have : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) ⊆ s.map Equiv.plift.symm.toEmbedding := by
rw [A, Finset.coe_map]
exact image_subset _ h
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset this]
simp only [Finset.prod_map, Equiv.coe_toEmbedding]
congr
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset (f : α → M) (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite)
{s : Finset α} (h : hf.toFinset ⊆ s) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset _ fun _ hx => h <| hf.mem_toFinset.2 hx
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_finset_prod_of_mulSupport_subset (f : α → M) {s : Finset α}
(h : mulSupport f ⊆ (s : Set α)) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
haveI h' : (s.finite_toSet.subset h).toFinset ⊆ s := by
simpa [← Finset.coe_subset, Set.coe_toFinset]
finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset _ _ h'
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_def (f : α → M) [Decidable (mulSupport f).Finite] :
∏ᶠ i : α, f i = if h : (mulSupport f).Finite then ∏ i ∈ h.toFinset, f i else 1 := by
split_ifs with h
· exact finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset _ h (Finset.Subset.refl _)
· rw [finprod, dif_neg]
rw [mulSupport_comp_eq_preimage]
exact mt (fun hf => hf.of_preimage Equiv.plift.surjective) h
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_of_infinite_mulSupport {f : α → M} (hf : (mulSupport f).Infinite) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 := by classical rw [finprod_def, dif_neg hf]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod (f : α → M) (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i : α, f i = ∏ i ∈ hf.toFinset, f i := by classical rw [finprod_def, dif_pos hf]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_of_fintype [Fintype α] (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i : α, f i = ∏ i, f i :=
finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset _ (Set.toFinite _) <| Finset.subset_univ _
@[to_additive]
theorem map_finset_prod {α F : Type*} [Fintype α] [EquivLike F M N] [MulEquivClass F M N] (f : F)
(g : α → M) : f (∏ i : α, g i) = ∏ i : α, f (g i) := by
simp [← finprod_eq_prod_of_fintype, MulEquivClass.map_finprod]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_cond_eq_prod_of_cond_iff (f : α → M) {p : α → Prop} {t : Finset α}
(h : ∀ {x}, f x ≠ 1 → (p x ↔ x ∈ t)) : (∏ᶠ (i) (_ : p i), f i) = ∏ i ∈ t, f i := by
set s := { x | p x }
change ∏ᶠ (i : α) (_ : i ∈ s), f i = ∏ i ∈ t, f i
have : mulSupport (s.mulIndicator f) ⊆ t := by
rw [Set.mulSupport_mulIndicator]
intro x hx
exact (h hx.2).1 hx.1
rw [finprod_mem_def, finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset _ this]
refine Finset.prod_congr rfl fun x hx => mulIndicator_apply_eq_self.2 fun hxs => ?_
contrapose! hxs
exact (h hxs).2 hx
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_cond_ne (f : α → M) (a : α) [DecidableEq α] (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
(∏ᶠ (i) (_ : i ≠ a), f i) = ∏ i ∈ hf.toFinset.erase a, f i := by
apply finprod_cond_eq_prod_of_cond_iff
intro x hx
rw [Finset.mem_erase, Finite.mem_toFinset, mem_mulSupport]
exact ⟨fun h => And.intro h hx, fun h => h.1⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq (f : α → M) {s : Set α} {t : Finset α}
(h : s ∩ mulSupport f = t.toSet ∩ mulSupport f) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ t, f i :=
finprod_cond_eq_prod_of_cond_iff _ <| by
intro x hxf
rw [← mem_mulSupport] at hxf
refine ⟨fun hx => ?_, fun hx => ?_⟩
· refine ((mem_inter_iff x t (mulSupport f)).mp ?_).1
rw [← Set.ext_iff.mp h x, mem_inter_iff]
exact ⟨hx, hxf⟩
· refine ((mem_inter_iff x s (mulSupport f)).mp ?_).1
rw [Set.ext_iff.mp h x, mem_inter_iff]
exact ⟨hx, hxf⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_subset (f : α → M) {s : Set α} {t : Finset α}
(h₁ : s ∩ mulSupport f ⊆ t) (h₂ : ↑t ⊆ s) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ t, f i :=
finprod_cond_eq_prod_of_cond_iff _ fun hx => ⟨fun h => h₁ ⟨h, hx⟩, fun h => h₂ h⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_prod (f : α → M) {s : Set α} (hf : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ hf.toFinset, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ <| by simp [inter_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_prod_filter (f : α → M) (s : Set α) [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)]
(hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ hf.toFinset with i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ <| by
ext x
simp [and_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_toFinset_prod (f : α → M) (s : Set α) [Fintype s] :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ s.toFinset, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ <| by simp_rw [coe_toFinset s]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_finite_toFinset_prod (f : α → M) {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ hs.toFinset, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ <| by rw [hs.coe_toFinset]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_finset_eq_prod (f : α → M) (s : Finset α) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_coe_finset (f : α → M) (s : Finset α) :
(∏ᶠ i ∈ (s : Set α), f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_one_of_infinite {f : α → M} {s : Set α} (hs : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Infinite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = 1 := by
rw [finprod_mem_def]
apply finprod_of_infinite_mulSupport
rwa [← mulSupport_mulIndicator] at hs
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_one_of_forall_eq_one {f : α → M} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = 1) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = 1 := by simp +contextual [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport (f : α → M) (s : Set α) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s ∩ mulSupport f, f i = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [finprod_mem_def, finprod_mem_def, mulIndicator_inter_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport_eq (f : α → M) (s t : Set α)
(h : s ∩ mulSupport f = t ∩ mulSupport f) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, f i := by
rw [← finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport, h, finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport_eq' (f : α → M) (s t : Set α)
(h : ∀ x ∈ mulSupport f, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, f i := by
apply finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport_eq
ext x
exact and_congr_left (h x)
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_univ (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ @Set.univ α, f i = ∏ᶠ i : α, f i :=
finprod_congr fun _ => finprod_true _
variable {f g : α → M} {a b : α} {s t : Set α}
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_congr (h₀ : s = t) (h₁ : ∀ x ∈ t, f x = g x) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, g i :=
h₀.symm ▸ finprod_congr fun i => finprod_congr_Prop rfl (h₁ i)
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_one_of_forall_eq_one {f : α → M} (h : ∀ x, f x = 1) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 := by
simp +contextual [h]
@[to_additive finsum_pos']
theorem one_lt_finprod' {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [PartialOrder M] [IsOrderedCancelMonoid M]
{f : ι → M}
(h : ∀ i, 1 ≤ f i) (h' : ∃ i, 1 < f i) (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) : 1 < ∏ᶠ i, f i := by
rcases h' with ⟨i, hi⟩
rw [finprod_eq_prod _ hf]
refine Finset.one_lt_prod' (fun i _ ↦ h i) ⟨i, ?_, hi⟩
simpa only [Finite.mem_toFinset, mem_mulSupport] using ne_of_gt hi
/-!
### Distributivity w.r.t. addition, subtraction, and (scalar) multiplication
-/
/-- If the multiplicative supports of `f` and `g` are finite, then the product of `f i * g i` equals
the product of `f i` multiplied by the product of `g i`. -/
@[to_additive
"If the additive supports of `f` and `g` are finite, then the sum of `f i + g i`
equals the sum of `f i` plus the sum of `g i`."]
theorem finprod_mul_distrib (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) (hg : (mulSupport g).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i, f i * g i = (∏ᶠ i, f i) * ∏ᶠ i, g i := by
classical
rw [finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset f hf Finset.subset_union_left,
finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset g hg Finset.subset_union_right, ←
Finset.prod_mul_distrib]
refine finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset _ ?_
simp only [Finset.coe_union, Finite.coe_toFinset, mulSupport_subset_iff,
mem_union, mem_mulSupport]
intro x
contrapose!
rintro ⟨hf, hg⟩
simp [hf, hg]
/-- If the multiplicative supports of `f` and `g` are finite, then the product of `f i / g i`
equals the product of `f i` divided by the product of `g i`. -/
@[to_additive
"If the additive supports of `f` and `g` are finite, then the sum of `f i - g i`
equals the sum of `f i` minus the sum of `g i`."]
theorem finprod_div_distrib [DivisionCommMonoid G] {f g : α → G} (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite)
(hg : (mulSupport g).Finite) : ∏ᶠ i, f i / g i = (∏ᶠ i, f i) / ∏ᶠ i, g i := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, finprod_mul_distrib hf ((mulSupport_inv g).symm.rec hg),
finprod_inv_distrib]
/-- A more general version of `finprod_mem_mul_distrib` that only requires `s ∩ mulSupport f` and
`s ∩ mulSupport g` rather than `s` to be finite. -/
@[to_additive
"A more general version of `finsum_mem_add_distrib` that only requires `s ∩ support f`
and `s ∩ support g` rather than `s` to be finite."]
theorem finprod_mem_mul_distrib' (hf : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) (hg : (s ∩ mulSupport g).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i * g i = (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, g i := by
rw [← mulSupport_mulIndicator] at hf hg
simp only [finprod_mem_def, mulIndicator_mul, finprod_mul_distrib hf hg]
/-- The product of the constant function `1` over any set equals `1`. -/
@[to_additive "The sum of the constant function `0` over any set equals `0`."]
theorem finprod_mem_one (s : Set α) : (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, (1 : M)) = 1 := by simp
/-- If a function `f` equals `1` on a set `s`, then the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s` equals `1`. -/
@[to_additive
"If a function `f` equals `0` on a set `s`, then the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s`
equals `0`."]
theorem finprod_mem_of_eqOn_one (hf : s.EqOn f 1) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = 1 := by
rw [← finprod_mem_one s]
exact finprod_mem_congr rfl hf
/-- If the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s` is not equal to `1`, then there is some `x ∈ s` such that
`f x ≠ 1`. -/
@[to_additive
"If the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s` is not equal to `0`, then there is some `x ∈ s`
such that `f x ≠ 0`."]
theorem exists_ne_one_of_finprod_mem_ne_one (h : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i ≠ 1) : ∃ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 1 := by
by_contra! h'
exact h (finprod_mem_of_eqOn_one h')
/-- Given a finite set `s`, the product of `f i * g i` over `i ∈ s` equals the product of `f i`
over `i ∈ s` times the product of `g i` over `i ∈ s`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a finite set `s`, the sum of `f i + g i` over `i ∈ s` equals the sum of `f i`
over `i ∈ s` plus the sum of `g i` over `i ∈ s`."]
theorem finprod_mem_mul_distrib (hs : s.Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i * g i = (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, g i :=
finprod_mem_mul_distrib' (hs.inter_of_left _) (hs.inter_of_left _)
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod {f : α → M} (g : M →* N) (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
g (∏ᶠ i, f i) = ∏ᶠ i, g (f i) :=
g.map_finprod_plift f <| hf.preimage Equiv.plift.injective.injOn
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_pow (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) (n : ℕ) : (∏ᶠ i, f i) ^ n = ∏ᶠ i, f i ^ n :=
(powMonoidHom n).map_finprod hf
/-- See also `finsum_smul` for a version that works even when the support of `f` is not finite,
but with slightly stronger typeclass requirements. -/
theorem finsum_smul' {R M : Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] {f : ι → R}
(hf : (support f).Finite) (x : M) : (∑ᶠ i, f i) • x = ∑ᶠ i, f i • x :=
((smulAddHom R M).flip x).map_finsum hf
/-- See also `smul_finsum` for a version that works even when the support of `f` is not finite,
but with slightly stronger typeclass requirements. -/
theorem smul_finsum' {R M : Type*} [Monoid R] [AddCommMonoid M] [DistribMulAction R M] (c : R)
{f : ι → M} (hf : (support f).Finite) : (c • ∑ᶠ i, f i) = ∑ᶠ i, c • f i :=
(DistribMulAction.toAddMonoidHom M c).map_finsum hf
/-- A more general version of `MonoidHom.map_finprod_mem` that requires `s ∩ mulSupport f` rather
than `s` to be finite. -/
@[to_additive
"A more general version of `AddMonoidHom.map_finsum_mem` that requires
`s ∩ support f` rather than `s` to be finite."]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_mem' {f : α → M} (g : M →* N) (h₀ : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) :
g (∏ᶠ j ∈ s, f j) = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, g (f i) := by
rw [g.map_finprod]
· simp only [g.map_finprod_Prop]
· simpa only [finprod_eq_mulIndicator_apply, mulSupport_mulIndicator]
/-- Given a monoid homomorphism `g : M →* N` and a function `f : α → M`, the value of `g` at the
product of `f i` over `i ∈ s` equals the product of `g (f i)` over `s`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given an additive monoid homomorphism `g : M →* N` and a function `f : α → M`, the
value of `g` at the sum of `f i` over `i ∈ s` equals the sum of `g (f i)` over `s`."]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_mem (f : α → M) (g : M →* N) (hs : s.Finite) :
g (∏ᶠ j ∈ s, f j) = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, g (f i) :=
g.map_finprod_mem' (hs.inter_of_left _)
@[to_additive]
theorem MulEquiv.map_finprod_mem (g : M ≃* N) (f : α → M) {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) :
g (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, g (f i) :=
g.toMonoidHom.map_finprod_mem f hs
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_inv_distrib [DivisionCommMonoid G] (f : α → G) (hs : s.Finite) :
(∏ᶠ x ∈ s, (f x)⁻¹) = (∏ᶠ x ∈ s, f x)⁻¹ :=
((MulEquiv.inv G).map_finprod_mem f hs).symm
/-- Given a finite set `s`, the product of `f i / g i` over `i ∈ s` equals the product of `f i`
over `i ∈ s` divided by the product of `g i` over `i ∈ s`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a finite set `s`, the sum of `f i / g i` over `i ∈ s` equals the sum of `f i`
over `i ∈ s` minus the sum of `g i` over `i ∈ s`."]
theorem finprod_mem_div_distrib [DivisionCommMonoid G] (f g : α → G) (hs : s.Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i / g i = (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) / ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, g i := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, finprod_mem_mul_distrib hs, finprod_mem_inv_distrib g hs]
/-!
### `∏ᶠ x ∈ s, f x` and set operations
-/
/-- The product of any function over an empty set is `1`. -/
@[to_additive "The sum of any function over an empty set is `0`."]
theorem finprod_mem_empty : (∏ᶠ i ∈ (∅ : Set α), f i) = 1 := by simp
/-- A set `s` is nonempty if the product of some function over `s` is not equal to `1`. -/
@[to_additive "A set `s` is nonempty if the sum of some function over `s` is not equal to `0`."]
theorem nonempty_of_finprod_mem_ne_one (h : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i ≠ 1) : s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.2 fun h' => h <| h'.symm ▸ finprod_mem_empty
/-- Given finite sets `s` and `t`, the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s ∪ t` times the product of
`f i` over `i ∈ s ∩ t` equals the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s` times the product of `f i`
over `i ∈ t`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given finite sets `s` and `t`, the sum of `f i` over `i ∈ s ∪ t` plus the sum of
`f i` over `i ∈ s ∩ t` equals the sum of `f i` over `i ∈ s` plus the sum of `f i`
over `i ∈ t`."]
theorem finprod_mem_union_inter (hs : s.Finite) (ht : t.Finite) :
((∏ᶠ i ∈ s ∪ t, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ s ∩ t, f i) = (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, f i := by
lift s to Finset α using hs; lift t to Finset α using ht
classical
rw [← Finset.coe_union, ← Finset.coe_inter]
simp only [finprod_mem_coe_finset, Finset.prod_union_inter]
/-- A more general version of `finprod_mem_union_inter` that requires `s ∩ mulSupport f` and
`t ∩ mulSupport f` rather than `s` and `t` to be finite. -/
@[to_additive
"A more general version of `finsum_mem_union_inter` that requires `s ∩ support f` and
`t ∩ support f` rather than `s` and `t` to be finite."]
theorem finprod_mem_union_inter' (hs : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) (ht : (t ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) :
((∏ᶠ i ∈ s ∪ t, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ s ∩ t, f i) = (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, f i := by
rw [← finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport f s, ← finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport f t, ←
finprod_mem_union_inter hs ht, ← union_inter_distrib_right, finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport, ←
finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport f (s ∩ t)]
congr 2
rw [inter_left_comm, inter_assoc, inter_assoc, inter_self, inter_left_comm]
/-- A more general version of `finprod_mem_union` that requires `s ∩ mulSupport f` and
`t ∩ mulSupport f` rather than `s` and `t` to be finite. -/
@[to_additive
"A more general version of `finsum_mem_union` that requires `s ∩ support f` and
`t ∩ support f` rather than `s` and `t` to be finite."]
theorem finprod_mem_union' (hst : Disjoint s t) (hs : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Finite)
(ht : (t ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s ∪ t, f i = (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, f i := by
rw [← finprod_mem_union_inter' hs ht, disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.1 hst, finprod_mem_empty,
mul_one]
/-- Given two finite disjoint sets `s` and `t`, the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s ∪ t` equals the
product of `f i` over `i ∈ s` times the product of `f i` over `i ∈ t`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given two finite disjoint sets `s` and `t`, the sum of `f i` over `i ∈ s ∪ t` equals
the sum of `f i` over `i ∈ s` plus the sum of `f i` over `i ∈ t`."]
theorem finprod_mem_union (hst : Disjoint s t) (hs : s.Finite) (ht : t.Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s ∪ t, f i = (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, f i :=
finprod_mem_union' hst (hs.inter_of_left _) (ht.inter_of_left _)
/-- A more general version of `finprod_mem_union'` that requires `s ∩ mulSupport f` and
`t ∩ mulSupport f` rather than `s` and `t` to be disjoint -/
@[to_additive
"A more general version of `finsum_mem_union'` that requires `s ∩ support f` and
`t ∩ support f` rather than `s` and `t` to be disjoint"]
theorem finprod_mem_union'' (hst : Disjoint (s ∩ mulSupport f) (t ∩ mulSupport f))
(hs : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) (ht : (t ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s ∪ t, f i = (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, f i := by
rw [← finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport f s, ← finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport f t, ←
finprod_mem_union hst hs ht, ← union_inter_distrib_right, finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport]
/-- The product of `f i` over `i ∈ {a}` equals `f a`. -/
@[to_additive "The sum of `f i` over `i ∈ {a}` equals `f a`."]
theorem finprod_mem_singleton : (∏ᶠ i ∈ ({a} : Set α), f i) = f a := by
rw [← Finset.coe_singleton, finprod_mem_coe_finset, Finset.prod_singleton]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_cond_eq_left : (∏ᶠ (i) (_ : i = a), f i) = f a :=
finprod_mem_singleton
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_cond_eq_right : (∏ᶠ (i) (_ : a = i), f i) = f a := by simp [@eq_comm _ a]
/-- A more general version of `finprod_mem_insert` that requires `s ∩ mulSupport f` rather than `s`
to be finite. -/
@[to_additive
"A more general version of `finsum_mem_insert` that requires `s ∩ support f` rather
than `s` to be finite."]
theorem finprod_mem_insert' (f : α → M) (h : a ∉ s) (hs : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ insert a s, f i = f a * ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [insert_eq, finprod_mem_union' _ _ hs, finprod_mem_singleton]
· rwa [disjoint_singleton_left]
· exact (finite_singleton a).inter_of_left _
/-- Given a finite set `s` and an element `a ∉ s`, the product of `f i` over `i ∈ insert a s` equals
`f a` times the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a finite set `s` and an element `a ∉ s`, the sum of `f i` over `i ∈ insert a s`
equals `f a` plus the sum of `f i` over `i ∈ s`."]
theorem finprod_mem_insert (f : α → M) (h : a ∉ s) (hs : s.Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ insert a s, f i = f a * ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_mem_insert' f h <| hs.inter_of_left _
/-- If `f a = 1` when `a ∉ s`, then the product of `f i` over `i ∈ insert a s` equals the product of
`f i` over `i ∈ s`. -/
@[to_additive
"If `f a = 0` when `a ∉ s`, then the sum of `f i` over `i ∈ insert a s` equals the sum
of `f i` over `i ∈ s`."]
theorem finprod_mem_insert_of_eq_one_if_not_mem (h : a ∉ s → f a = 1) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ insert a s, f i = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i := by
refine finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport_eq' _ _ _ fun x hx => ⟨?_, Or.inr⟩
rintro (rfl | hxs)
exacts [not_imp_comm.1 h hx, hxs]
/-- If `f a = 1`, then the product of `f i` over `i ∈ insert a s` equals the product of `f i` over
`i ∈ s`. -/
@[to_additive
"If `f a = 0`, then the sum of `f i` over `i ∈ insert a s` equals the sum of `f i`
over `i ∈ s`."]
theorem finprod_mem_insert_one (h : f a = 1) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ insert a s, f i = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_mem_insert_of_eq_one_if_not_mem fun _ => h
/-- If the multiplicative support of `f` is finite, then for every `x` in the domain of `f`, `f x`
divides `finprod f`. -/
theorem finprod_mem_dvd {f : α → N} (a : α) (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) : f a ∣ finprod f := by
by_cases ha : a ∈ mulSupport f
· rw [finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset f hf (Set.Subset.refl _)]
exact Finset.dvd_prod_of_mem f ((Finite.mem_toFinset hf).mpr ha)
· rw [nmem_mulSupport.mp ha]
exact one_dvd (finprod f)
/-- The product of `f i` over `i ∈ {a, b}`, `a ≠ b`, is equal to `f a * f b`. -/
@[to_additive "The sum of `f i` over `i ∈ {a, b}`, `a ≠ b`, is equal to `f a + f b`."]
theorem finprod_mem_pair (h : a ≠ b) : (∏ᶠ i ∈ ({a, b} : Set α), f i) = f a * f b := by
rw [finprod_mem_insert, finprod_mem_singleton]
exacts [h, finite_singleton b]
/-- The product of `f y` over `y ∈ g '' s` equals the product of `f (g i)` over `s`
provided that `g` is injective on `s ∩ mulSupport (f ∘ g)`. -/
@[to_additive
"The sum of `f y` over `y ∈ g '' s` equals the sum of `f (g i)` over `s` provided that
`g` is injective on `s ∩ support (f ∘ g)`."]
theorem finprod_mem_image' {s : Set β} {g : β → α} (hg : (s ∩ mulSupport (f ∘ g)).InjOn g) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ g '' s, f i = ∏ᶠ j ∈ s, f (g j) := by
classical
by_cases hs : (s ∩ mulSupport (f ∘ g)).Finite
· have hg : ∀ x ∈ hs.toFinset, ∀ y ∈ hs.toFinset, g x = g y → x = y := by
simpa only [hs.mem_toFinset]
have := finprod_mem_eq_prod (comp f g) hs
unfold Function.comp at this
rw [this, ← Finset.prod_image hg]
refine finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq f ?_
rw [Finset.coe_image, hs.coe_toFinset, ← image_inter_mulSupport_eq, inter_assoc, inter_self]
· unfold Function.comp at hs
rw [finprod_mem_eq_one_of_infinite hs, finprod_mem_eq_one_of_infinite]
rwa [image_inter_mulSupport_eq, infinite_image_iff hg]
/-- The product of `f y` over `y ∈ g '' s` equals the product of `f (g i)` over `s` provided that
`g` is injective on `s`. -/
@[to_additive
"The sum of `f y` over `y ∈ g '' s` equals the sum of `f (g i)` over `s` provided that
`g` is injective on `s`."]
theorem finprod_mem_image {s : Set β} {g : β → α} (hg : s.InjOn g) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ g '' s, f i = ∏ᶠ j ∈ s, f (g j) :=
finprod_mem_image' <| hg.mono inter_subset_left
/-- The product of `f y` over `y ∈ Set.range g` equals the product of `f (g i)` over all `i`
provided that `g` is injective on `mulSupport (f ∘ g)`. -/
@[to_additive
"The sum of `f y` over `y ∈ Set.range g` equals the sum of `f (g i)` over all `i`
provided that `g` is injective on `support (f ∘ g)`."]
theorem finprod_mem_range' {g : β → α} (hg : (mulSupport (f ∘ g)).InjOn g) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ range g, f i = ∏ᶠ j, f (g j) := by
rw [← image_univ, finprod_mem_image', finprod_mem_univ]
rwa [univ_inter]
/-- The product of `f y` over `y ∈ Set.range g` equals the product of `f (g i)` over all `i`
provided that `g` is injective. -/
@[to_additive
"The sum of `f y` over `y ∈ Set.range g` equals the sum of `f (g i)` over all `i`
provided that `g` is injective."]
theorem finprod_mem_range {g : β → α} (hg : Injective g) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ range g, f i = ∏ᶠ j, f (g j) :=
finprod_mem_range' hg.injOn
/-- See also `Finset.prod_bij`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `Finset.sum_bij`."]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_of_bijOn {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → M} {g : β → M} (e : α → β)
(he₀ : s.BijOn e t) (he₁ : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = g (e x)) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ᶠ j ∈ t, g j := by
rw [← Set.BijOn.image_eq he₀, finprod_mem_image he₀.2.1]
exact finprod_mem_congr rfl he₁
/-- See `finprod_comp`, `Fintype.prod_bijective` and `Finset.prod_bij`. -/
@[to_additive "See `finsum_comp`, `Fintype.sum_bijective` and `Finset.sum_bij`."]
theorem finprod_eq_of_bijective {f : α → M} {g : β → M} (e : α → β) (he₀ : Bijective e)
(he₁ : ∀ x, f x = g (e x)) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ᶠ j, g j := by
rw [← finprod_mem_univ f, ← finprod_mem_univ g]
exact finprod_mem_eq_of_bijOn _ (bijective_iff_bijOn_univ.mp he₀) fun x _ => he₁ x
/-- See also `finprod_eq_of_bijective`, `Fintype.prod_bijective` and `Finset.prod_bij`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `finsum_eq_of_bijective`, `Fintype.sum_bijective` and `Finset.sum_bij`."]
theorem finprod_comp {g : β → M} (e : α → β) (he₀ : Function.Bijective e) :
(∏ᶠ i, g (e i)) = ∏ᶠ j, g j :=
finprod_eq_of_bijective e he₀ fun _ => rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_comp_equiv (e : α ≃ β) {f : β → M} : (∏ᶠ i, f (e i)) = ∏ᶠ i', f i' :=
finprod_comp e e.bijective
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_set_coe_eq_finprod_mem (s : Set α) : ∏ᶠ j : s, f j = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [← finprod_mem_range, Subtype.range_coe]
exact Subtype.coe_injective
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_subtype_eq_finprod_cond (p : α → Prop) :
∏ᶠ j : Subtype p, f j = ∏ᶠ (i) (_ : p i), f i :=
finprod_set_coe_eq_finprod_mem { i | p i }
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_inter_mul_diff' (t : Set α) (h : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) :
((∏ᶠ i ∈ s ∩ t, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ s \ t, f i) = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [← finprod_mem_union', inter_union_diff]
· rw [disjoint_iff_inf_le]
exact fun x hx => hx.2.2 hx.1.2
exacts [h.subset fun x hx => ⟨hx.1.1, hx.2⟩, h.subset fun x hx => ⟨hx.1.1, hx.2⟩]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_inter_mul_diff (t : Set α) (h : s.Finite) :
((∏ᶠ i ∈ s ∩ t, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ s \ t, f i) = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_mem_inter_mul_diff' _ <| h.inter_of_left _
/-- A more general version of `finprod_mem_mul_diff` that requires `t ∩ mulSupport f` rather than
`t` to be finite. -/
@[to_additive
"A more general version of `finsum_mem_add_diff` that requires `t ∩ support f` rather
than `t` to be finite."]
theorem finprod_mem_mul_diff' (hst : s ⊆ t) (ht : (t ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) :
((∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ t \ s, f i) = ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, f i := by
rw [← finprod_mem_inter_mul_diff' _ ht, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right hst]
/-- Given a finite set `t` and a subset `s` of `t`, the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s`
times the product of `f i` over `t \ s` equals the product of `f i` over `i ∈ t`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a finite set `t` and a subset `s` of `t`, the sum of `f i` over `i ∈ s` plus
the sum of `f i` over `t \\ s` equals the sum of `f i` over `i ∈ t`."]
theorem finprod_mem_mul_diff (hst : s ⊆ t) (ht : t.Finite) :
((∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ t \ s, f i) = ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, f i :=
finprod_mem_mul_diff' hst (ht.inter_of_left _)
/-- Given a family of pairwise disjoint finite sets `t i` indexed by a finite type, the product of
`f a` over the union `⋃ i, t i` is equal to the product over all indexes `i` of the products of
`f a` over `a ∈ t i`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a family of pairwise disjoint finite sets `t i` indexed by a finite type, the
sum of `f a` over the union `⋃ i, t i` is equal to the sum over all indexes `i` of the
sums of `f a` over `a ∈ t i`."]
theorem finprod_mem_iUnion [Finite ι] {t : ι → Set α} (h : Pairwise (Disjoint on t))
(ht : ∀ i, (t i).Finite) : ∏ᶠ a ∈ ⋃ i : ι, t i, f a = ∏ᶠ i, ∏ᶠ a ∈ t i, f a := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
lift t to ι → Finset α using ht
classical
rw [← biUnion_univ, ← Finset.coe_univ, ← Finset.coe_biUnion, finprod_mem_coe_finset,
Finset.prod_biUnion]
· simp only [finprod_mem_coe_finset, finprod_eq_prod_of_fintype]
· exact fun x _ y _ hxy => Finset.disjoint_coe.1 (h hxy)
/-- Given a family of sets `t : ι → Set α`, a finite set `I` in the index type such that all sets
`t i`, `i ∈ I`, are finite, if all `t i`, `i ∈ I`, are pairwise disjoint, then the product of `f a`
over `a ∈ ⋃ i ∈ I, t i` is equal to the product over `i ∈ I` of the products of `f a` over
`a ∈ t i`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a family of sets `t : ι → Set α`, a finite set `I` in the index type such that
all sets `t i`, `i ∈ I`, are finite, if all `t i`, `i ∈ I`, are pairwise disjoint, then the
sum of `f a` over `a ∈ ⋃ i ∈ I, t i` is equal to the sum over `i ∈ I` of the sums of `f a`
over `a ∈ t i`."]
theorem finprod_mem_biUnion {I : Set ι} {t : ι → Set α} (h : I.PairwiseDisjoint t) (hI : I.Finite)
(ht : ∀ i ∈ I, (t i).Finite) : ∏ᶠ a ∈ ⋃ x ∈ I, t x, f a = ∏ᶠ i ∈ I, ∏ᶠ j ∈ t i, f j := by
haveI := hI.fintype
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, finprod_mem_iUnion, ← finprod_set_coe_eq_finprod_mem]
exacts [fun x y hxy => h x.2 y.2 (Subtype.coe_injective.ne hxy), fun b => ht b b.2]
/-- If `t` is a finite set of pairwise disjoint finite sets, then the product of `f a`
over `a ∈ ⋃₀ t` is the product over `s ∈ t` of the products of `f a` over `a ∈ s`. -/
@[to_additive
"If `t` is a finite set of pairwise disjoint finite sets, then the sum of `f a` over
`a ∈ ⋃₀ t` is the sum over `s ∈ t` of the sums of `f a` over `a ∈ s`."]
theorem finprod_mem_sUnion {t : Set (Set α)} (h : t.PairwiseDisjoint id) (ht₀ : t.Finite)
(ht₁ : ∀ x ∈ t, Set.Finite x) : ∏ᶠ a ∈ ⋃₀ t, f a = ∏ᶠ s ∈ t, ∏ᶠ a ∈ s, f a := by
rw [Set.sUnion_eq_biUnion]
exact finprod_mem_biUnion h ht₀ ht₁
@[to_additive]
lemma finprod_option {f : Option α → M} (hf : (mulSupport (f ∘ some)).Finite) :
∏ᶠ o, f o = f none * ∏ᶠ a, f (some a) := by
replace hf : (mulSupport f).Finite := by simpa [finite_option]
convert finprod_mem_insert' f (show none ∉ Set.range Option.some by aesop)
(hf.subset inter_subset_right)
· aesop
· rw [finprod_mem_range]
exact Option.some_injective _
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_finprod_cond_ne (a : α) (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
(f a * ∏ᶠ (i) (_ : i ≠ a), f i) = ∏ᶠ i, f i := by
classical
rw [finprod_eq_prod _ hf]
have h : ∀ x : α, f x ≠ 1 → (x ≠ a ↔ x ∈ hf.toFinset \ {a}) := by
intro x hx
rw [Finset.mem_sdiff, Finset.mem_singleton, Finite.mem_toFinset, mem_mulSupport]
exact ⟨fun h => And.intro hx h, fun h => h.2⟩
rw [finprod_cond_eq_prod_of_cond_iff f (fun hx => h _ hx), Finset.sdiff_singleton_eq_erase]
by_cases ha : a ∈ mulSupport f
· apply Finset.mul_prod_erase _ _ ((Finite.mem_toFinset _).mpr ha)
· rw [mem_mulSupport, not_not] at ha
rw [ha, one_mul]
apply Finset.prod_erase _ ha
/-- If `s : Set α` and `t : Set β` are finite sets, then taking the product over `s` commutes with
taking the product over `t`. -/
@[to_additive
"If `s : Set α` and `t : Set β` are finite sets, then summing over `s` commutes with
summing over `t`."]
theorem finprod_mem_comm {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (f : α → β → M) (hs : s.Finite) (ht : t.Finite) :
(∏ᶠ i ∈ s, ∏ᶠ j ∈ t, f i j) = ∏ᶠ j ∈ t, ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i j := by
lift s to Finset α using hs; lift t to Finset β using ht
simp only [finprod_mem_coe_finset]
exact Finset.prod_comm
/-- To prove a property of a finite product, it suffices to prove that the property is
multiplicative and holds on factors. -/
@[to_additive
"To prove a property of a finite sum, it suffices to prove that the property is
additive and holds on summands."]
theorem finprod_mem_induction (p : M → Prop) (hp₀ : p 1) (hp₁ : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x * y))
(hp₂ : ∀ x ∈ s, p <| f x) : p (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) :=
finprod_induction _ hp₀ hp₁ fun x => finprod_induction _ hp₀ hp₁ <| hp₂ x
theorem finprod_cond_nonneg {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]
{p : α → Prop} {f : α → R}
(hf : ∀ x, p x → 0 ≤ f x) : 0 ≤ ∏ᶠ (x) (_ : p x), f x :=
finprod_nonneg fun x => finprod_nonneg <| hf x
@[to_additive]
theorem single_le_finprod {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [PartialOrder M] [IsOrderedMonoid M]
(i : α) {f : α → M}
(hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) (h : ∀ j, 1 ≤ f j) : f i ≤ ∏ᶠ j, f j := by
classical calc
f i ≤ ∏ j ∈ insert i hf.toFinset, f j :=
Finset.single_le_prod' (fun j _ => h j) (Finset.mem_insert_self _ _)
_ = ∏ᶠ j, f j :=
(finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset _ hf (Finset.subset_insert _ _)).symm
theorem finprod_eq_zero {M₀ : Type*} [CommMonoidWithZero M₀] (f : α → M₀) (x : α) (hx : f x = 0)
(hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) : ∏ᶠ x, f x = 0 := by
nontriviality
rw [finprod_eq_prod f hf]
refine Finset.prod_eq_zero (hf.mem_toFinset.2 ?_) hx
simp [hx]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_prod_comm (s : Finset β) (f : α → β → M)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, (mulSupport fun a => f a b).Finite) :
(∏ᶠ a : α, ∏ b ∈ s, f a b) = ∏ b ∈ s, ∏ᶠ a : α, f a b := by
have hU :
(mulSupport fun a => ∏ b ∈ s, f a b) ⊆
(s.finite_toSet.biUnion fun b hb => h b (Finset.mem_coe.1 hb)).toFinset := by
rw [Finite.coe_toFinset]
intro x hx
simp only [exists_prop, mem_iUnion, Ne, mem_mulSupport, Finset.mem_coe]
contrapose! hx
rw [mem_mulSupport, not_not, Finset.prod_congr rfl hx, Finset.prod_const_one]
rw [finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset _ hU, Finset.prod_comm]
refine Finset.prod_congr rfl fun b hb => (finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset _ ?_).symm
intro a ha
simp only [Finite.coe_toFinset, mem_iUnion]
exact ⟨b, hb, ha⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_finprod_comm (s : Finset α) (f : α → β → M) (h : ∀ a ∈ s, (mulSupport (f a)).Finite) :
(∏ a ∈ s, ∏ᶠ b : β, f a b) = ∏ᶠ b : β, ∏ a ∈ s, f a b :=
(finprod_prod_comm s (fun b a => f a b) h).symm
theorem mul_finsum {R : Type*} [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R] (f : α → R) (r : R)
(h : (support f).Finite) : (r * ∑ᶠ a : α, f a) = ∑ᶠ a : α, r * f a :=
(AddMonoidHom.mulLeft r).map_finsum h
theorem mul_finsum_mem {R : Type*} [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R] {s : Set α} (f : α → R) (r : R)
(hs : s.Finite) : (r * ∑ᶠ a ∈ s, f a) = ∑ᶠ a ∈ s, r * f a :=
(AddMonoidHom.mulLeft r).map_finsum_mem f hs
theorem finsum_mul {R : Type*} [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R] (f : α → R) (r : R)
(h : (support f).Finite) : (∑ᶠ a : α, f a) * r = ∑ᶠ a : α, f a * r :=
(AddMonoidHom.mulRight r).map_finsum h
theorem finsum_mem_mul {R : Type*} [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R] {s : Set α} (f : α → R) (r : R)
(hs : s.Finite) : (∑ᶠ a ∈ s, f a) * r = ∑ᶠ a ∈ s, f a * r :=
(AddMonoidHom.mulRight r).map_finsum_mem f hs
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma finprod_apply {α ι : Type*} {f : ι → α → N} (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) (a : α) :
(∏ᶠ i, f i) a = ∏ᶠ i, f i a := by
classical
have hf' : (mulSupport fun i ↦ f i a).Finite := hf.subset (by aesop)
simp only [finprod_def, dif_pos, hf, hf', Finset.prod_apply]
symm
apply Finset.prod_subset <;> aesop
@[to_additive]
theorem Finset.mulSupport_of_fiberwise_prod_subset_image [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset α) (f : α → M)
(g : α → β) : (mulSupport fun b => ∏ a ∈ s with g a = b, f a) ⊆ s.image g := by
simp only [Finset.coe_image, Set.mem_image, Finset.mem_coe, Function.support_subset_iff]
intro b h
suffices {a ∈ s | g a = b}.Nonempty by
simpa only [fiber_nonempty_iff_mem_image, Finset.mem_image, exists_prop]
exact Finset.nonempty_of_prod_ne_one h
/-- Note that `b ∈ (s.filter (fun ab => Prod.fst ab = a)).image Prod.snd` iff `(a, b) ∈ s` so
we can simplify the right hand side of this lemma. However the form stated here is more useful for
iterating this lemma, e.g., if we have `f : α × β × γ → M`. -/
@[to_additive
"Note that `b ∈ (s.filter (fun ab => Prod.fst ab = a)).image Prod.snd` iff `(a, b) ∈ s` so
we can simplify the right hand side of this lemma. However the form stated here is more
useful for iterating this lemma, e.g., if we have `f : α × β × γ → M`."]
theorem finprod_mem_finset_product' [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset (α × β))
(f : α × β → M) :
(∏ᶠ (ab) (_ : ab ∈ s), f ab) =
∏ᶠ (a) (b) (_ : b ∈ (s.filter fun ab => Prod.fst ab = a).image Prod.snd), f (a, b) := by
have (a) :
∏ i ∈ (s.filter fun ab => Prod.fst ab = a).image Prod.snd, f (a, i) =
(s.filter (Prod.fst · = a)).prod f := by
refine Finset.prod_nbij' (fun b ↦ (a, b)) Prod.snd ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> aesop
rw [finprod_mem_finset_eq_prod]
simp_rw [finprod_mem_finset_eq_prod, this]
rw [finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset _
(s.mulSupport_of_fiberwise_prod_subset_image f Prod.fst),
← Finset.prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to (t := Finset.image Prod.fst s) _ f]
-- `finish` could close the goal here
simp only [Finset.mem_image]
exact fun x hx => ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
/-- See also `finprod_mem_finset_product'`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `finsum_mem_finset_product'`."]
theorem finprod_mem_finset_product (s : Finset (α × β)) (f : α × β → M) :
(∏ᶠ (ab) (_ : ab ∈ s), f ab) = ∏ᶠ (a) (b) (_ : (a, b) ∈ s), f (a, b) := by
classical
rw [finprod_mem_finset_product']
simp
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_finset_product₃ {γ : Type*} (s : Finset (α × β × γ)) (f : α × β × γ → M) :
(∏ᶠ (abc) (_ : abc ∈ s), f abc) = ∏ᶠ (a) (b) (c) (_ : (a, b, c) ∈ s), f (a, b, c) := by
classical
rw [finprod_mem_finset_product']
simp_rw [finprod_mem_finset_product']
simp
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_curry (f : α × β → M) (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
| ∏ᶠ ab, f ab = ∏ᶠ (a) (b), f (a, b) := by
have h₁ : ∀ a, ∏ᶠ _ : a ∈ hf.toFinset, f a = f a := by simp
have h₂ : ∏ᶠ a, f a = ∏ᶠ (a) (_ : a ∈ hf.toFinset), f a := by simp
simp_rw [h₂, finprod_mem_finset_product, h₁]
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/Finprod.lean | 1,109 | 1,112 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Morenikeji Neri
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.EuclideanDomain.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.EuclideanDomain.Field
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Maps
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Nonunits
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Noetherian.UniqueFactorizationDomain
/-!
# Principal ideal rings, principal ideal domains, and Bézout rings
A principal ideal ring (PIR) is a ring in which all left ideals are principal. A
principal ideal domain (PID) is an integral domain which is a principal ideal ring.
The definition of `IsPrincipalIdealRing` can be found in `Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Span`.
# Main definitions
Note that for principal ideal domains, one should use
`[IsDomain R] [IsPrincipalIdealRing R]`. There is no explicit definition of a PID.
Theorems about PID's are in the `PrincipalIdealRing` namespace.
- `IsBezout`: the predicate saying that every finitely generated left ideal is principal.
- `generator`: a generator of a principal ideal (or more generally submodule)
- `to_uniqueFactorizationMonoid`: a PID is a unique factorization domain
# Main results
- `Ideal.IsPrime.to_maximal_ideal`: a non-zero prime ideal in a PID is maximal.
- `EuclideanDomain.to_principal_ideal_domain` : a Euclidean domain is a PID.
- `IsBezout.nonemptyGCDMonoid`: Every Bézout domain is a GCD domain.
-/
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} {M : Type v}
open Set Function
open Submodule
section
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
instance bot_isPrincipal : (⊥ : Submodule R M).IsPrincipal :=
⟨⟨0, by simp⟩⟩
instance top_isPrincipal : (⊤ : Submodule R R).IsPrincipal :=
⟨⟨1, Ideal.span_singleton_one.symm⟩⟩
variable (R)
/-- A Bézout ring is a ring whose finitely generated ideals are principal. -/
class IsBezout : Prop where
/-- Any finitely generated ideal is principal. -/
isPrincipal_of_FG : ∀ I : Ideal R, I.FG → I.IsPrincipal
instance (priority := 100) IsBezout.of_isPrincipalIdealRing [IsPrincipalIdealRing R] : IsBezout R :=
⟨fun I _ => IsPrincipalIdealRing.principal I⟩
instance (priority := 100) DivisionRing.isPrincipalIdealRing (K : Type u) [DivisionRing K] :
IsPrincipalIdealRing K where
principal S := by
rcases Ideal.eq_bot_or_top S with (rfl | rfl)
· apply bot_isPrincipal
· apply top_isPrincipal
end
namespace Submodule.IsPrincipal
variable [AddCommMonoid M]
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] [Module R M]
/-- `generator I`, if `I` is a principal submodule, is an `x ∈ M` such that `span R {x} = I` -/
noncomputable def generator (S : Submodule R M) [S.IsPrincipal] : M :=
Classical.choose (principal S)
theorem span_singleton_generator (S : Submodule R M) [S.IsPrincipal] : span R {generator S} = S :=
Eq.symm (Classical.choose_spec (principal S))
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Ideal.span_singleton_generator (I : Ideal R) [I.IsPrincipal] :
Ideal.span ({generator I} : Set R) = I :=
Eq.symm (Classical.choose_spec (principal I))
@[simp]
theorem generator_mem (S : Submodule R M) [S.IsPrincipal] : generator S ∈ S := by
have : generator S ∈ span R {generator S} := subset_span (mem_singleton _)
convert this
exact span_singleton_generator S |>.symm
theorem mem_iff_eq_smul_generator (S : Submodule R M) [S.IsPrincipal] {x : M} :
x ∈ S ↔ ∃ s : R, x = s • generator S := by
simp_rw [@eq_comm _ x, ← mem_span_singleton, span_singleton_generator]
theorem eq_bot_iff_generator_eq_zero (S : Submodule R M) [S.IsPrincipal] :
S = ⊥ ↔ generator S = 0 := by rw [← @span_singleton_eq_bot R M, span_singleton_generator]
protected lemma fg {S : Submodule R M} (h : S.IsPrincipal) : S.FG :=
⟨{h.generator}, by simp only [Finset.coe_singleton, span_singleton_generator]⟩
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) _root_.PrincipalIdealRing.isNoetherianRing [IsPrincipalIdealRing R] :
IsNoetherianRing R where
noetherian S := (IsPrincipalIdealRing.principal S).fg
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) _root_.IsPrincipalIdealRing.of_isNoetherianRing_of_isBezout
[IsNoetherianRing R] [IsBezout R] : IsPrincipalIdealRing R where
principal S := IsBezout.isPrincipal_of_FG S (IsNoetherian.noetherian S)
end Semiring
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] [Module R M]
theorem associated_generator_span_self [IsPrincipalIdealRing R] [IsDomain R] (r : R) :
Associated (generator <| Ideal.span {r}) r := by
rw [← Ideal.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton]
exact Ideal.span_singleton_generator _
theorem mem_iff_generator_dvd (S : Ideal R) [S.IsPrincipal] {x : R} : x ∈ S ↔ generator S ∣ x :=
(mem_iff_eq_smul_generator S).trans (exists_congr fun a => by simp only [mul_comm, smul_eq_mul])
theorem prime_generator_of_isPrime (S : Ideal R) [S.IsPrincipal] [is_prime : S.IsPrime]
(ne_bot : S ≠ ⊥) : Prime (generator S) :=
⟨fun h => ne_bot ((eq_bot_iff_generator_eq_zero S).2 h), fun h =>
is_prime.ne_top (S.eq_top_of_isUnit_mem (generator_mem S) h), fun _ _ => by
simpa only [← mem_iff_generator_dvd S] using is_prime.2⟩
-- Note that the converse may not hold if `ϕ` is not injective.
theorem generator_map_dvd_of_mem {N : Submodule R M} (ϕ : M →ₗ[R] R) [(N.map ϕ).IsPrincipal] {x : M}
(hx : x ∈ N) : generator (N.map ϕ) ∣ ϕ x := by
rw [← mem_iff_generator_dvd, Submodule.mem_map]
exact ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
-- Note that the converse may not hold if `ϕ` is not injective.
theorem generator_submoduleImage_dvd_of_mem {N O : Submodule R M} (hNO : N ≤ O) (ϕ : O →ₗ[R] R)
[(ϕ.submoduleImage N).IsPrincipal] {x : M} (hx : x ∈ N) :
generator (ϕ.submoduleImage N) ∣ ϕ ⟨x, hNO hx⟩ := by
rw [← mem_iff_generator_dvd, LinearMap.mem_submoduleImage_of_le hNO]
exact ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
end CommRing
end Submodule.IsPrincipal
namespace IsBezout
section
variable [Ring R]
instance span_pair_isPrincipal [IsBezout R] (x y : R) : (Ideal.span {x, y}).IsPrincipal := by
classical exact isPrincipal_of_FG (Ideal.span {x, y}) ⟨{x, y}, by simp⟩
variable (x y : R) [(Ideal.span {x, y}).IsPrincipal]
/-- A choice of gcd of two elements in a Bézout domain.
Note that the choice is usually not unique. -/
noncomputable def gcd : R := Submodule.IsPrincipal.generator (Ideal.span {x, y})
theorem span_gcd : Ideal.span {gcd x y} = Ideal.span {x, y} :=
Ideal.span_singleton_generator _
end
variable [CommRing R] (x y z : R) [(Ideal.span {x, y}).IsPrincipal]
theorem gcd_dvd_left : gcd x y ∣ x :=
(Submodule.IsPrincipal.mem_iff_generator_dvd _).mp (Ideal.subset_span (by simp))
theorem gcd_dvd_right : gcd x y ∣ y :=
(Submodule.IsPrincipal.mem_iff_generator_dvd _).mp (Ideal.subset_span (by simp))
variable {x y z} in
theorem dvd_gcd (hx : z ∣ x) (hy : z ∣ y) : z ∣ gcd x y := by
rw [← Ideal.span_singleton_le_span_singleton] at hx hy ⊢
rw [span_gcd, Ideal.span_insert, sup_le_iff]
exact ⟨hx, hy⟩
theorem gcd_eq_sum : ∃ a b : R, a * x + b * y = gcd x y :=
Ideal.mem_span_pair.mp (by rw [← span_gcd]; apply Ideal.subset_span; simp)
variable {x y}
theorem _root_.IsRelPrime.isCoprime (h : IsRelPrime x y) : IsCoprime x y := by
rw [← Ideal.isCoprime_span_singleton_iff, Ideal.isCoprime_iff_sup_eq, ← Ideal.span_union,
Set.singleton_union, ← span_gcd, Ideal.span_singleton_eq_top]
exact h (gcd_dvd_left x y) (gcd_dvd_right x y)
theorem _root_.isRelPrime_iff_isCoprime : IsRelPrime x y ↔ IsCoprime x y :=
⟨IsRelPrime.isCoprime, IsCoprime.isRelPrime⟩
variable (R)
/-- Any Bézout domain is a GCD domain. This is not an instance since `GCDMonoid` contains data,
and this might not be how we would like to construct it. -/
noncomputable def toGCDDomain [IsBezout R] [IsDomain R] [DecidableEq R] : GCDMonoid R :=
gcdMonoidOfGCD (gcd · ·) (gcd_dvd_left · ·) (gcd_dvd_right · ·) dvd_gcd
instance nonemptyGCDMonoid [IsBezout R] [IsDomain R] : Nonempty (GCDMonoid R) := by
classical exact ⟨toGCDDomain R⟩
theorem associated_gcd_gcd [IsDomain R] [GCDMonoid R] :
Associated (IsBezout.gcd x y) (GCDMonoid.gcd x y) :=
gcd_greatest_associated (gcd_dvd_left _ _ ) (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (fun _ => dvd_gcd)
end IsBezout
namespace IsPrime
open Submodule.IsPrincipal Ideal
-- TODO -- for a non-ID one could perhaps prove that if p < q are prime then q maximal;
-- 0 isn't prime in a non-ID PIR but the Krull dimension is still <= 1.
-- The below result follows from this, but we could also use the below result to
-- prove this (quotient out by p).
theorem to_maximal_ideal [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] [IsPrincipalIdealRing R] {S : Ideal R}
[hpi : IsPrime S] (hS : S ≠ ⊥) : IsMaximal S :=
isMaximal_iff.2
⟨(ne_top_iff_one S).1 hpi.1, by
intro T x hST hxS hxT
obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ := (mem_iff_generator_dvd _).1 (hST <| generator_mem S)
cases hpi.mem_or_mem (show generator T * z ∈ S from hz ▸ generator_mem S) with
| inl h =>
have hTS : T ≤ S := by
rwa [← T.span_singleton_generator, Ideal.span_le, singleton_subset_iff]
exact (hxS <| hTS hxT).elim
| inr h =>
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := (mem_iff_generator_dvd _).1 h
have : generator S ≠ 0 := mt (eq_bot_iff_generator_eq_zero _).2 hS
rw [← mul_one (generator S), hy, mul_left_comm, mul_right_inj' this] at hz
exact hz.symm ▸ T.mul_mem_right _ (generator_mem T)⟩
end IsPrime
section
open EuclideanDomain
variable [EuclideanDomain R]
theorem mod_mem_iff {S : Ideal R} {x y : R} (hy : y ∈ S) : x % y ∈ S ↔ x ∈ S :=
⟨fun hxy => div_add_mod x y ▸ S.add_mem (S.mul_mem_right _ hy) hxy, fun hx =>
(mod_eq_sub_mul_div x y).symm ▸ S.sub_mem hx (S.mul_mem_right _ hy)⟩
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) EuclideanDomain.to_principal_ideal_domain : IsPrincipalIdealRing R where
principal S := by classical exact
⟨if h : { x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0 }.Nonempty then
have wf : WellFounded (EuclideanDomain.r : R → R → Prop) := EuclideanDomain.r_wellFounded
have hmin : WellFounded.min wf { x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0 } h ∈ S ∧
WellFounded.min wf { x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0 } h ≠ 0 :=
WellFounded.min_mem wf { x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0 } h
⟨WellFounded.min wf { x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0 } h,
Submodule.ext fun x => ⟨fun hx =>
div_add_mod x (WellFounded.min wf { x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0 } h) ▸
(Ideal.mem_span_singleton.2 <| dvd_add (dvd_mul_right _ _) <| by
have : x % WellFounded.min wf { x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0 } h ∉
{ x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0 } :=
fun h₁ => WellFounded.not_lt_min wf _ h h₁ (mod_lt x hmin.2)
have : x % WellFounded.min wf { x : R | x ∈ S ∧ x ≠ 0 } h = 0 := by
simp only [not_and_or, Set.mem_setOf_eq, not_ne_iff] at this
exact this.neg_resolve_left <| (mod_mem_iff hmin.1).2 hx
simp [*]),
fun hx =>
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := Ideal.mem_span_singleton.1 hx
hy.symm ▸ S.mul_mem_right _ hmin.1⟩⟩
else ⟨0, Submodule.ext fun a => by
rw [← @Submodule.bot_coe R R _ _ _, span_eq, Submodule.mem_bot]
exact ⟨fun haS => by_contra fun ha0 => h ⟨a, ⟨haS, ha0⟩⟩,
fun h₁ => h₁.symm ▸ S.zero_mem⟩⟩⟩
end
theorem IsField.isPrincipalIdealRing {R : Type*} [Ring R] (h : IsField R) :
IsPrincipalIdealRing R :=
@EuclideanDomain.to_principal_ideal_domain R (@Field.toEuclideanDomain R h.toField)
namespace PrincipalIdealRing
open IsPrincipalIdealRing
theorem isMaximal_of_irreducible [CommSemiring R] [IsPrincipalIdealRing R] {p : R}
(hp : Irreducible p) : Ideal.IsMaximal (span R ({p} : Set R)) :=
⟨⟨mt Ideal.span_singleton_eq_top.1 hp.1, fun I hI => by
rcases principal I with ⟨a, rfl⟩
rw [Ideal.submodule_span_eq, Ideal.span_singleton_eq_top]
rcases Ideal.span_singleton_le_span_singleton.1 (le_of_lt hI) with ⟨b, rfl⟩
refine (of_irreducible_mul hp).resolve_right (mt (fun hb => ?_) (not_le_of_lt hI))
rw [Ideal.submodule_span_eq, Ideal.submodule_span_eq,
Ideal.span_singleton_le_span_singleton, IsUnit.mul_right_dvd hb]⟩⟩
variable [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] [IsPrincipalIdealRing R]
section
open scoped Classical in
/-- `factors a` is a multiset of irreducible elements whose product is `a`, up to units -/
noncomputable def factors (a : R) : Multiset R :=
if h : a = 0 then ∅ else Classical.choose (WfDvdMonoid.exists_factors a h)
theorem factors_spec (a : R) (h : a ≠ 0) :
(∀ b ∈ factors a, Irreducible b) ∧ Associated (factors a).prod a := by
unfold factors; rw [dif_neg h]
exact Classical.choose_spec (WfDvdMonoid.exists_factors a h)
theorem ne_zero_of_mem_factors {R : Type v} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] [IsPrincipalIdealRing R]
{a b : R} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ∈ factors a) : b ≠ 0 :=
Irreducible.ne_zero ((factors_spec a ha).1 b hb)
theorem mem_submonoid_of_factors_subset_of_units_subset (s : Submonoid R) {a : R} (ha : a ≠ 0)
(hfac : ∀ b ∈ factors a, b ∈ s) (hunit : ∀ c : Rˣ, (c : R) ∈ s) : a ∈ s := by
rcases (factors_spec a ha).2 with ⟨c, hc⟩
rw [← hc]
exact mul_mem (multiset_prod_mem _ hfac) (hunit _)
/-- If a `RingHom` maps all units and all factors of an element `a` into a submonoid `s`, then it
also maps `a` into that submonoid. -/
theorem ringHom_mem_submonoid_of_factors_subset_of_units_subset {R S : Type*} [CommRing R]
[IsDomain R] [IsPrincipalIdealRing R] [NonAssocSemiring S] (f : R →+* S) (s : Submonoid S)
(a : R) (ha : a ≠ 0) (h : ∀ b ∈ factors a, f b ∈ s) (hf : ∀ c : Rˣ, f c ∈ s) : f a ∈ s :=
mem_submonoid_of_factors_subset_of_units_subset (s.comap f.toMonoidHom) ha h hf
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- A principal ideal domain has unique factorization -/
instance (priority := 100) to_uniqueFactorizationMonoid : UniqueFactorizationMonoid R :=
{ (IsNoetherianRing.wfDvdMonoid : WfDvdMonoid R) with
irreducible_iff_prime := irreducible_iff_prime }
end
end PrincipalIdealRing
|
section Surjective
open Submodule
| Mathlib/RingTheory/PrincipalIdealDomain.lean | 348 | 351 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015, 2017 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Real
import Mathlib.Tactic.Bound.Attribute
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Basic
/-!
## Pseudo-metric spaces
This file defines pseudo-metric spaces: these differ from metric spaces by not imposing the
condition `dist x y = 0 → x = y`.
Many definitions and theorems expected on (pseudo-)metric spaces are already introduced on uniform
spaces and topological spaces. For example: open and closed sets, compactness, completeness,
continuity and uniform continuity.
## Main definitions
* `Dist α`: Endows a space `α` with a function `dist a b`.
* `PseudoMetricSpace α`: A space endowed with a distance function, which can
be zero even if the two elements are non-equal.
* `Metric.ball x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x < ε`.
* `Metric.Bounded s`: Whether a subset of a `PseudoMetricSpace` is bounded.
* `MetricSpace α`: A `PseudoMetricSpace` with the guarantee `dist x y = 0 → x = y`.
Additional useful definitions:
* `nndist a b`: `dist` as a function to the non-negative reals.
* `Metric.closedBall x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x ≤ ε`.
* `Metric.sphere x ε`: The set of all points `y` with `dist y x = ε`.
TODO (anyone): Add "Main results" section.
## Tags
pseudo_metric, dist
-/
assert_not_exists compactSpace_uniformity
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Bornology
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Uniformity Topology
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {X ι : Type*}
theorem UniformSpace.ofDist_aux (ε : ℝ) (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ δ > (0 : ℝ), ∀ x < δ, ∀ y < δ, x + y < ε :=
⟨ε / 2, half_pos hε, fun _x hx _y hy => add_halves ε ▸ add_lt_add hx hy⟩
/-- Construct a uniform structure from a distance function and metric space axioms -/
def UniformSpace.ofDist (dist : α → α → ℝ) (dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0)
(dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : UniformSpace α :=
.ofFun dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle ofDist_aux
/-- Construct a bornology from a distance function and metric space axioms. -/
abbrev Bornology.ofDist {α : Type*} (dist : α → α → ℝ) (dist_comm : ∀ x y, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : Bornology α :=
Bornology.ofBounded { s : Set α | ∃ C, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C }
⟨0, fun _ hx _ => hx.elim⟩ (fun _ ⟨c, hc⟩ _ h => ⟨c, fun _ hx _ hy => hc (h hx) (h hy)⟩)
(fun s hs t ht => by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩
· rwa [empty_union]
rcases t.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨y, hy⟩
· rwa [union_empty]
rsuffices ⟨C, hC⟩ : ∃ C, ∀ z ∈ s ∪ t, dist x z ≤ C
· refine ⟨C + C, fun a ha b hb => (dist_triangle a x b).trans ?_⟩
simpa only [dist_comm] using add_le_add (hC _ ha) (hC _ hb)
rcases hs with ⟨Cs, hs⟩; rcases ht with ⟨Ct, ht⟩
refine ⟨max Cs (dist x y + Ct), fun z hz => hz.elim
(fun hz => (hs hx hz).trans (le_max_left _ _))
(fun hz => (dist_triangle x y z).trans <|
(add_le_add le_rfl (ht hy hz)).trans (le_max_right _ _))⟩)
fun z => ⟨dist z z, forall_eq.2 <| forall_eq.2 le_rfl⟩
/-- The distance function (given an ambient metric space on `α`), which returns
a nonnegative real number `dist x y` given `x y : α`. -/
@[ext]
class Dist (α : Type*) where
/-- Distance between two points -/
dist : α → α → ℝ
export Dist (dist)
-- the uniform structure and the emetric space structure are embedded in the metric space structure
-- to avoid instance diamond issues. See Note [forgetful inheritance].
/-- This is an internal lemma used inside the default of `PseudoMetricSpace.edist`. -/
private theorem dist_nonneg' {α} {x y : α} (dist : α → α → ℝ)
(dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0) (dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : 0 ≤ dist x y :=
have : 0 ≤ 2 * dist x y :=
calc 0 = dist x x := (dist_self _).symm
_ ≤ dist x y + dist y x := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ = 2 * dist x y := by rw [two_mul, dist_comm]
nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right this two_pos
/-- A pseudometric space is a type endowed with a `ℝ`-valued distance `dist` satisfying
reflexivity `dist x x = 0`, commutativity `dist x y = dist y x`, and the triangle inequality
`dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z`.
Note that we do not require `dist x y = 0 → x = y`. See metric spaces (`MetricSpace`) for the
similar class with that stronger assumption.
Any pseudometric space is a topological space and a uniform space (see `TopologicalSpace`,
`UniformSpace`), where the topology and uniformity come from the metric.
Note that a T1 pseudometric space is just a metric space.
We make the uniformity/topology part of the data instead of deriving it from the metric. This eg
ensures that we do not get a diamond when doing
`[PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] : TopologicalSpace (α × β)`:
The product metric and product topology agree, but not definitionally so.
See Note [forgetful inheritance]. -/
class PseudoMetricSpace (α : Type u) : Type u extends Dist α where
dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0
dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x
dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z
/-- Extended distance between two points -/
edist : α → α → ℝ≥0∞ := fun x y => ENNReal.ofNNReal ⟨dist x y, dist_nonneg' _ ‹_› ‹_› ‹_›⟩
edist_dist : ∀ x y : α, edist x y = ENNReal.ofReal (dist x y) := by
intros x y; exact ENNReal.coe_nnreal_eq _
toUniformSpace : UniformSpace α := .ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
uniformity_dist : 𝓤 α = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by intros; rfl
toBornology : Bornology α := Bornology.ofDist dist dist_comm dist_triangle
cobounded_sets : (Bornology.cobounded α).sets =
{ s | ∃ C : ℝ, ∀ x ∈ sᶜ, ∀ y ∈ sᶜ, dist x y ≤ C } := by intros; rfl
/-- Two pseudo metric space structures with the same distance function coincide. -/
@[ext]
theorem PseudoMetricSpace.ext {α : Type*} {m m' : PseudoMetricSpace α}
(h : m.toDist = m'.toDist) : m = m' := by
let d := m.toDist
obtain ⟨_, _, _, _, hed, _, hU, _, hB⟩ := m
let d' := m'.toDist
obtain ⟨_, _, _, _, hed', _, hU', _, hB'⟩ := m'
obtain rfl : d = d' := h
congr
· ext x y : 2
rw [hed, hed']
· exact UniformSpace.ext (hU.trans hU'.symm)
· ext : 2
rw [← Filter.mem_sets, ← Filter.mem_sets, hB, hB']
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α]
attribute [instance] PseudoMetricSpace.toUniformSpace PseudoMetricSpace.toBornology
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 200) PseudoMetricSpace.toEDist : EDist α :=
⟨PseudoMetricSpace.edist⟩
/-- Construct a pseudo-metric space structure whose underlying topological space structure
(definitionally) agrees which a pre-existing topology which is compatible with a given distance
function. -/
def PseudoMetricSpace.ofDistTopology {α : Type u} [TopologicalSpace α] (dist : α → α → ℝ)
(dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0) (dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z)
(H : ∀ s : Set α, IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y, dist x y < ε → y ∈ s) :
PseudoMetricSpace α :=
{ dist := dist
dist_self := dist_self
dist_comm := dist_comm
dist_triangle := dist_triangle
toUniformSpace :=
(UniformSpace.ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle).replaceTopology <|
TopologicalSpace.ext_iff.2 fun s ↦ (H s).trans <| forall₂_congr fun x _ ↦
((UniformSpace.hasBasis_ofFun (exists_gt (0 : ℝ)) dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
UniformSpace.ofDist_aux).comap (Prod.mk x)).mem_iff.symm
uniformity_dist := rfl
toBornology := Bornology.ofDist dist dist_comm dist_triangle
cobounded_sets := rfl }
@[simp]
theorem dist_self (x : α) : dist x x = 0 :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_self x
theorem dist_comm (x y : α) : dist x y = dist y x :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_comm x y
theorem edist_dist (x y : α) : edist x y = ENNReal.ofReal (dist x y) :=
PseudoMetricSpace.edist_dist x y
@[bound]
theorem dist_triangle (x y z : α) : dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_triangle x y z
theorem dist_triangle_left (x y z : α) : dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := by
rw [dist_comm z]; apply dist_triangle
theorem dist_triangle_right (x y z : α) : dist x y ≤ dist x z + dist y z := by
rw [dist_comm y]; apply dist_triangle
theorem dist_triangle4 (x y z w : α) : dist x w ≤ dist x y + dist y z + dist z w :=
calc
dist x w ≤ dist x z + dist z w := dist_triangle x z w
_ ≤ dist x y + dist y z + dist z w := add_le_add_right (dist_triangle x y z) _
theorem dist_triangle4_left (x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : α) :
dist x₂ y₂ ≤ dist x₁ y₁ + (dist x₁ x₂ + dist y₁ y₂) := by
rw [add_left_comm, dist_comm x₁, ← add_assoc]
apply dist_triangle4
theorem dist_triangle4_right (x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : α) :
dist x₁ y₁ ≤ dist x₁ x₂ + dist y₁ y₂ + dist x₂ y₂ := by
rw [add_right_comm, dist_comm y₁]
apply dist_triangle4
theorem dist_triangle8 (a b c d e f g h : α) : dist a h ≤ dist a b + dist b c + dist c d
+ dist d e + dist e f + dist f g + dist g h := by
apply le_trans (dist_triangle4 a f g h)
apply add_le_add_right (add_le_add_right _ (dist f g)) (dist g h)
apply le_trans (dist_triangle4 a d e f)
apply add_le_add_right (add_le_add_right _ (dist d e)) (dist e f)
exact dist_triangle4 a b c d
theorem swap_dist : Function.swap (@dist α _) = dist := by funext x y; exact dist_comm _ _
theorem abs_dist_sub_le (x y z : α) : |dist x z - dist y z| ≤ dist x y :=
abs_sub_le_iff.2
⟨sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (dist_triangle _ _ _), sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (dist_triangle_left _ _ _)⟩
@[bound]
theorem dist_nonneg {x y : α} : 0 ≤ dist x y :=
dist_nonneg' dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq Function
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: distances are nonnegative. -/
@[positivity Dist.dist _ _]
def evalDist : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(@Dist.dist $β $inst $a $b) =>
let _inst ← synthInstanceQ q(PseudoMetricSpace $β)
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.nonnegative q(dist_nonneg))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not dist"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
example {x y : α} : 0 ≤ dist x y := by positivity
@[simp] theorem abs_dist {a b : α} : |dist a b| = dist a b := abs_of_nonneg dist_nonneg
/-- A version of `Dist` that takes value in `ℝ≥0`. -/
class NNDist (α : Type*) where
/-- Nonnegative distance between two points -/
nndist : α → α → ℝ≥0
export NNDist (nndist)
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- Distance as a nonnegative real number. -/
instance (priority := 100) PseudoMetricSpace.toNNDist : NNDist α :=
⟨fun a b => ⟨dist a b, dist_nonneg⟩⟩
/-- Express `dist` in terms of `nndist` -/
theorem dist_nndist (x y : α) : dist x y = nndist x y := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nndist (x y : α) : ↑(nndist x y) = dist x y := rfl
/-- Express `edist` in terms of `nndist` -/
theorem edist_nndist (x y : α) : edist x y = nndist x y := by
rw [edist_dist, dist_nndist, ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal]
/-- Express `nndist` in terms of `edist` -/
theorem nndist_edist (x y : α) : nndist x y = (edist x y).toNNReal := by
simp [edist_nndist]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nnreal_ennreal_nndist (x y : α) : ↑(nndist x y) = edist x y :=
(edist_nndist x y).symm
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem edist_lt_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : edist x y < c ↔ nndist x y < c := by
rw [edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_lt_coe]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem edist_le_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : edist x y ≤ c ↔ nndist x y ≤ c := by
rw [edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_le_coe]
/-- In a pseudometric space, the extended distance is always finite -/
theorem edist_lt_top {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] (x y : α) : edist x y < ⊤ :=
(edist_dist x y).symm ▸ ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top
/-- In a pseudometric space, the extended distance is always finite -/
theorem edist_ne_top (x y : α) : edist x y ≠ ⊤ :=
(edist_lt_top x y).ne
/-- `nndist x x` vanishes -/
@[simp] theorem nndist_self (a : α) : nndist a a = 0 := NNReal.coe_eq_zero.1 (dist_self a)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem dist_lt_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : dist x y < c ↔ nndist x y < c :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem dist_le_coe {x y : α} {c : ℝ≥0} : dist x y ≤ c ↔ nndist x y ≤ c :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem edist_lt_ofReal {x y : α} {r : ℝ} : edist x y < ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ dist x y < r := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff_of_nonneg dist_nonneg]
@[simp]
theorem edist_le_ofReal {x y : α} {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
edist x y ≤ ENNReal.ofReal r ↔ dist x y ≤ r := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff hr]
/-- Express `nndist` in terms of `dist` -/
theorem nndist_dist (x y : α) : nndist x y = Real.toNNReal (dist x y) := by
rw [dist_nndist, Real.toNNReal_coe]
theorem nndist_comm (x y : α) : nndist x y = nndist y x := NNReal.eq <| dist_comm x y
/-- Triangle inequality for the nonnegative distance -/
theorem nndist_triangle (x y z : α) : nndist x z ≤ nndist x y + nndist y z :=
dist_triangle _ _ _
theorem nndist_triangle_left (x y z : α) : nndist x y ≤ nndist z x + nndist z y :=
dist_triangle_left _ _ _
theorem nndist_triangle_right (x y z : α) : nndist x y ≤ nndist x z + nndist y z :=
dist_triangle_right _ _ _
/-- Express `dist` in terms of `edist` -/
theorem dist_edist (x y : α) : dist x y = (edist x y).toReal := by
rw [edist_dist, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal dist_nonneg]
namespace Metric
-- instantiate pseudometric space as a topology
variable {x y z : α} {δ ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ} {s : Set α}
/-- `ball x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x < ε` -/
def ball (x : α) (ε : ℝ) : Set α :=
{ y | dist y x < ε }
@[simp]
theorem mem_ball : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ dist y x < ε :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_ball' : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ dist x y < ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_ball]
theorem pos_of_mem_ball (hy : y ∈ ball x ε) : 0 < ε :=
dist_nonneg.trans_lt hy
theorem mem_ball_self (h : 0 < ε) : x ∈ ball x ε := by
rwa [mem_ball, dist_self]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_ball : (ball x ε).Nonempty ↔ 0 < ε :=
⟨fun ⟨_x, hx⟩ => pos_of_mem_ball hx, fun h => ⟨x, mem_ball_self h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem ball_eq_empty : ball x ε = ∅ ↔ ε ≤ 0 := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_ball, not_lt]
@[simp]
theorem ball_zero : ball x 0 = ∅ := by rw [ball_eq_empty]
/-- If a point belongs to an open ball, then there is a strictly smaller radius whose ball also
contains it.
See also `exists_lt_subset_ball`. -/
theorem exists_lt_mem_ball_of_mem_ball (h : x ∈ ball y ε) : ∃ ε' < ε, x ∈ ball y ε' := by
simp only [mem_ball] at h ⊢
exact ⟨(dist x y + ε) / 2, by linarith, by linarith⟩
theorem ball_eq_ball (ε : ℝ) (x : α) :
UniformSpace.ball x { p | dist p.2 p.1 < ε } = Metric.ball x ε :=
rfl
theorem ball_eq_ball' (ε : ℝ) (x : α) :
UniformSpace.ball x { p | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } = Metric.ball x ε := by
ext
simp [dist_comm, UniformSpace.ball]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_ball_nat (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, ball x n = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => exists_nat_gt (dist y x)
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_ball_nat_succ (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, ball x (n + 1) = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => (exists_nat_gt (dist y x)).imp fun _ h => h.trans (lt_add_one _)
/-- `closedBall x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x ≤ ε` -/
def closedBall (x : α) (ε : ℝ) :=
{ y | dist y x ≤ ε }
@[simp] theorem mem_closedBall : y ∈ closedBall x ε ↔ dist y x ≤ ε := Iff.rfl
theorem mem_closedBall' : y ∈ closedBall x ε ↔ dist x y ≤ ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_closedBall]
/-- `sphere x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x = ε` -/
def sphere (x : α) (ε : ℝ) := { y | dist y x = ε }
@[simp] theorem mem_sphere : y ∈ sphere x ε ↔ dist y x = ε := Iff.rfl
theorem mem_sphere' : y ∈ sphere x ε ↔ dist x y = ε := by rw [dist_comm, mem_sphere]
theorem ne_of_mem_sphere (h : y ∈ sphere x ε) (hε : ε ≠ 0) : y ≠ x :=
ne_of_mem_of_not_mem h <| by simpa using hε.symm
theorem nonneg_of_mem_sphere (hy : y ∈ sphere x ε) : 0 ≤ ε :=
dist_nonneg.trans_eq hy
@[simp]
theorem sphere_eq_empty_of_neg (hε : ε < 0) : sphere x ε = ∅ :=
Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr fun _y hy => (nonneg_of_mem_sphere hy).not_lt hε
theorem sphere_eq_empty_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (hε : ε ≠ 0) : sphere x ε = ∅ :=
Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr fun _ h => ne_of_mem_sphere h hε (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
instance sphere_isEmpty_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] [NeZero ε] : IsEmpty (sphere x ε) := by
rw [sphere_eq_empty_of_subsingleton (NeZero.ne ε)]; infer_instance
theorem closedBall_eq_singleton_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (h : 0 ≤ ε) :
closedBall x ε = {x} := by
ext x'
simpa [Subsingleton.allEq x x']
theorem ball_eq_singleton_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (h : 0 < ε) : ball x ε = {x} := by
ext x'
simpa [Subsingleton.allEq x x']
theorem mem_closedBall_self (h : 0 ≤ ε) : x ∈ closedBall x ε := by
rwa [mem_closedBall, dist_self]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_closedBall : (closedBall x ε).Nonempty ↔ 0 ≤ ε :=
⟨fun ⟨_x, hx⟩ => dist_nonneg.trans hx, fun h => ⟨x, mem_closedBall_self h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_eq_empty : closedBall x ε = ∅ ↔ ε < 0 := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_closedBall, not_le]
/-- Closed balls and spheres coincide when the radius is non-positive -/
theorem closedBall_eq_sphere_of_nonpos (hε : ε ≤ 0) : closedBall x ε = sphere x ε :=
Set.ext fun _ => (hε.trans dist_nonneg).le_iff_eq
theorem ball_subset_closedBall : ball x ε ⊆ closedBall x ε := fun _y hy =>
mem_closedBall.2 (le_of_lt hy)
theorem sphere_subset_closedBall : sphere x ε ⊆ closedBall x ε := fun _ => le_of_eq
lemma sphere_subset_ball {r R : ℝ} (h : r < R) : sphere x r ⊆ ball x R := fun _x hx ↦
(mem_sphere.1 hx).trans_lt h
theorem closedBall_disjoint_ball (h : δ + ε ≤ dist x y) : Disjoint (closedBall x δ) (ball y ε) :=
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _a ha1 ha2 =>
(h.trans <| dist_triangle_left _ _ _).not_lt <| add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt ha1 ha2
theorem ball_disjoint_closedBall (h : δ + ε ≤ dist x y) : Disjoint (ball x δ) (closedBall y ε) :=
(closedBall_disjoint_ball <| by rwa [add_comm, dist_comm]).symm
theorem ball_disjoint_ball (h : δ + ε ≤ dist x y) : Disjoint (ball x δ) (ball y ε) :=
(closedBall_disjoint_ball h).mono_left ball_subset_closedBall
theorem closedBall_disjoint_closedBall (h : δ + ε < dist x y) :
Disjoint (closedBall x δ) (closedBall y ε) :=
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _a ha1 ha2 =>
h.not_le <| (dist_triangle_left _ _ _).trans <| add_le_add ha1 ha2
theorem sphere_disjoint_ball : Disjoint (sphere x ε) (ball x ε) :=
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun _y hy₁ hy₂ => absurd hy₁ <| ne_of_lt hy₂
@[simp]
theorem ball_union_sphere : ball x ε ∪ sphere x ε = closedBall x ε :=
Set.ext fun _y => (@le_iff_lt_or_eq ℝ _ _ _).symm
@[simp]
theorem sphere_union_ball : sphere x ε ∪ ball x ε = closedBall x ε := by
rw [union_comm, ball_union_sphere]
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_diff_sphere : closedBall x ε \ sphere x ε = ball x ε := by
rw [← ball_union_sphere, Set.union_diff_cancel_right sphere_disjoint_ball.symm.le_bot]
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_diff_ball : closedBall x ε \ ball x ε = sphere x ε := by
rw [← ball_union_sphere, Set.union_diff_cancel_left sphere_disjoint_ball.symm.le_bot]
theorem mem_ball_comm : x ∈ ball y ε ↔ y ∈ ball x ε := by rw [mem_ball', mem_ball]
theorem mem_closedBall_comm : x ∈ closedBall y ε ↔ y ∈ closedBall x ε := by
rw [mem_closedBall', mem_closedBall]
theorem mem_sphere_comm : x ∈ sphere y ε ↔ y ∈ sphere x ε := by rw [mem_sphere', mem_sphere]
@[gcongr]
theorem ball_subset_ball (h : ε₁ ≤ ε₂) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball x ε₂ := fun _y yx =>
lt_of_lt_of_le (mem_ball.1 yx) h
theorem closedBall_eq_bInter_ball : closedBall x ε = ⋂ δ > ε, ball x δ := by
ext y; rw [mem_closedBall, ← forall_lt_iff_le', mem_iInter₂]; rfl
theorem ball_subset_ball' (h : ε₁ + dist x y ≤ ε₂) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball y ε₂ := fun z hz =>
calc
dist z y ≤ dist z x + dist x y := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ < ε₁ + dist x y := add_lt_add_right (mem_ball.1 hz) _
_ ≤ ε₂ := h
@[gcongr]
theorem closedBall_subset_closedBall (h : ε₁ ≤ ε₂) : closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ closedBall x ε₂ :=
fun _y (yx : _ ≤ ε₁) => le_trans yx h
theorem closedBall_subset_closedBall' (h : ε₁ + dist x y ≤ ε₂) :
closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ closedBall y ε₂ := fun z hz =>
calc
dist z y ≤ dist z x + dist x y := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ ε₁ + dist x y := add_le_add_right (mem_closedBall.1 hz) _
_ ≤ ε₂ := h
theorem closedBall_subset_ball (h : ε₁ < ε₂) : closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ ball x ε₂ :=
fun y (yh : dist y x ≤ ε₁) => lt_of_le_of_lt yh h
theorem closedBall_subset_ball' (h : ε₁ + dist x y < ε₂) :
closedBall x ε₁ ⊆ ball y ε₂ := fun z hz =>
calc
dist z y ≤ dist z x + dist x y := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ ε₁ + dist x y := add_le_add_right (mem_closedBall.1 hz) _
_ < ε₂ := h
theorem dist_le_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_closedBall
(h : (closedBall x ε₁ ∩ closedBall y ε₂).Nonempty) : dist x y ≤ ε₁ + ε₂ :=
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := h
calc
dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := dist_triangle_left _ _ _
_ ≤ ε₁ + ε₂ := add_le_add hz.1 hz.2
theorem dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_ball (h : (closedBall x ε₁ ∩ ball y ε₂).Nonempty) :
dist x y < ε₁ + ε₂ :=
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := h
calc
dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := dist_triangle_left _ _ _
_ < ε₁ + ε₂ := add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt hz.1 hz.2
theorem dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_ball_inter_closedBall (h : (ball x ε₁ ∩ closedBall y ε₂).Nonempty) :
dist x y < ε₁ + ε₂ := by
rw [inter_comm] at h
rw [add_comm, dist_comm]
exact dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_ball h
theorem dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_ball_inter_ball (h : (ball x ε₁ ∩ ball y ε₂).Nonempty) :
dist x y < ε₁ + ε₂ :=
dist_lt_add_of_nonempty_closedBall_inter_ball <|
h.mono (inter_subset_inter ball_subset_closedBall Subset.rfl)
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_closedBall_nat (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, closedBall x n = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => exists_nat_ge (dist y x)
theorem iUnion_inter_closedBall_nat (s : Set α) (x : α) : ⋃ n : ℕ, s ∩ closedBall x n = s := by
rw [← inter_iUnion, iUnion_closedBall_nat, inter_univ]
theorem ball_subset (h : dist x y ≤ ε₂ - ε₁) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball y ε₂ := fun z zx => by
rw [← add_sub_cancel ε₁ ε₂]
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (dist_triangle z x y) (add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le zx h)
theorem ball_half_subset (y) (h : y ∈ ball x (ε / 2)) : ball y (ε / 2) ⊆ ball x ε :=
ball_subset <| by rw [sub_self_div_two]; exact le_of_lt h
theorem exists_ball_subset_ball (h : y ∈ ball x ε) : ∃ ε' > 0, ball y ε' ⊆ ball x ε :=
⟨_, sub_pos.2 h, ball_subset <| by rw [sub_sub_self]⟩
/-- If a property holds for all points in closed balls of arbitrarily large radii, then it holds for
all points. -/
theorem forall_of_forall_mem_closedBall (p : α → Prop) (x : α)
(H : ∃ᶠ R : ℝ in atTop, ∀ y ∈ closedBall x R, p y) (y : α) : p y := by
obtain ⟨R, hR, h⟩ : ∃ R ≥ dist y x, ∀ z : α, z ∈ closedBall x R → p z :=
frequently_iff.1 H (Ici_mem_atTop (dist y x))
exact h _ hR
/-- If a property holds for all points in balls of arbitrarily large radii, then it holds for all
points. -/
theorem forall_of_forall_mem_ball (p : α → Prop) (x : α)
(H : ∃ᶠ R : ℝ in atTop, ∀ y ∈ ball x R, p y) (y : α) : p y := by
obtain ⟨R, hR, h⟩ : ∃ R > dist y x, ∀ z : α, z ∈ ball x R → p z :=
frequently_iff.1 H (Ioi_mem_atTop (dist y x))
exact h _ hR
theorem isBounded_iff {s : Set α} :
IsBounded s ↔ ∃ C : ℝ, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C := by
rw [isBounded_def, ← Filter.mem_sets, @PseudoMetricSpace.cobounded_sets α, mem_setOf_eq,
compl_compl]
theorem isBounded_iff_eventually {s : Set α} :
IsBounded s ↔ ∀ᶠ C in atTop, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C :=
isBounded_iff.trans
⟨fun ⟨C, h⟩ => eventually_atTop.2 ⟨C, fun _C' hC' _x hx _y hy => (h hx hy).trans hC'⟩,
Eventually.exists⟩
theorem isBounded_iff_exists_ge {s : Set α} (c : ℝ) :
IsBounded s ↔ ∃ C, c ≤ C ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C :=
⟨fun h => ((eventually_ge_atTop c).and (isBounded_iff_eventually.1 h)).exists, fun h =>
isBounded_iff.2 <| h.imp fun _ => And.right⟩
theorem isBounded_iff_nndist {s : Set α} :
IsBounded s ↔ ∃ C : ℝ≥0, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → nndist x y ≤ C := by
simp only [isBounded_iff_exists_ge 0, NNReal.exists, ← NNReal.coe_le_coe, ← dist_nndist,
NNReal.coe_mk, exists_prop]
theorem toUniformSpace_eq :
‹PseudoMetricSpace α›.toUniformSpace = .ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle :=
UniformSpace.ext PseudoMetricSpace.uniformity_dist
theorem uniformity_basis_dist :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by
rw [toUniformSpace_eq]
exact UniformSpace.hasBasis_ofFun (exists_gt _) _ _ _ _ _
/-- Given `f : β → ℝ`, if `f` sends `{i | p i}` to a set of positive numbers
accumulating to zero, then `f i`-neighborhoods of the diagonal form a basis of `𝓤 α`.
For specific bases see `uniformity_basis_dist`, `uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_succ`,
and `uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_pos`. -/
protected theorem mk_uniformity_basis {β : Type*} {p : β → Prop} {f : β → ℝ}
(hf₀ : ∀ i, p i → 0 < f i) (hf : ∀ ⦃ε⦄, 0 < ε → ∃ i, p i ∧ f i ≤ ε) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun i => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < f i } := by
refine ⟨fun s => uniformity_basis_dist.mem_iff.trans ?_⟩
constructor
· rintro ⟨ε, ε₀, hε⟩
rcases hf ε₀ with ⟨i, hi, H⟩
exact ⟨i, hi, fun x (hx : _ < _) => hε <| lt_of_lt_of_le hx H⟩
· exact fun ⟨i, hi, H⟩ => ⟨f i, hf₀ i hi, H⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_rat :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun r : ℚ => 0 < r) fun r => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ => Rat.cast_pos.2) fun _ε hε =>
let ⟨r, hr0, hrε⟩ := exists_rat_btwn hε
⟨r, Rat.cast_pos.1 hr0, hrε.le⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_succ :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < 1 / (↑n + 1) } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun n _ => div_pos zero_lt_one <| Nat.cast_add_one_pos n) fun _ε ε0 =>
(exists_nat_one_div_lt ε0).imp fun _n hn => ⟨trivial, le_of_lt hn⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_pos :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun n : ℕ => 0 < n) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < 1 / ↑n } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ hn => div_pos zero_lt_one <| Nat.cast_pos.2 hn) fun _ ε0 =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_nat_one_div_lt ε0
⟨n + 1, Nat.succ_pos n, mod_cast hn.le⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ : ℕ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r ^ n } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ _ => pow_pos h0 _) fun _ε ε0 =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one ε0 h1
⟨n, trivial, hn.le⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_lt {R : ℝ} (hR : 0 < R) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun r : ℝ => 0 < r ∧ r < R) fun r => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ => And.left) fun r hr =>
⟨min r (R / 2), ⟨lt_min hr (half_pos hR), min_lt_iff.2 <| Or.inr (half_lt_self hR)⟩,
min_le_left _ _⟩
/-- Given `f : β → ℝ`, if `f` sends `{i | p i}` to a set of positive numbers
accumulating to zero, then closed neighborhoods of the diagonal of sizes `{f i | p i}`
form a basis of `𝓤 α`.
Currently we have only one specific basis `uniformity_basis_dist_le` based on this constructor.
More can be easily added if needed in the future. -/
protected theorem mk_uniformity_basis_le {β : Type*} {p : β → Prop} {f : β → ℝ}
(hf₀ : ∀ x, p x → 0 < f x) (hf : ∀ ε, 0 < ε → ∃ x, p x ∧ f x ≤ ε) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun x => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ f x } := by
refine ⟨fun s => uniformity_basis_dist.mem_iff.trans ?_⟩
constructor
· rintro ⟨ε, ε₀, hε⟩
rcases exists_between ε₀ with ⟨ε', hε'⟩
rcases hf ε' hε'.1 with ⟨i, hi, H⟩
exact ⟨i, hi, fun x (hx : _ ≤ _) => hε <| lt_of_le_of_lt (le_trans hx H) hε'.2⟩
· exact fun ⟨i, hi, H⟩ => ⟨f i, hf₀ i hi, fun x (hx : _ < _) => H (mem_setOf.2 hx.le)⟩
/-- Constant size closed neighborhoods of the diagonal form a basis
of the uniformity filter. -/
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_le :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis ((0 : ℝ) < ·) fun ε => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ ε } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis_le (fun _ => id) fun ε ε₀ => ⟨ε, ε₀, le_refl ε⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_le_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ : ℕ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ r ^ n } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis_le (fun _ _ => pow_pos h0 _) fun _ε ε0 =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one ε0 h1
⟨n, trivial, hn.le⟩
theorem mem_uniformity_dist {s : Set (α × α)} :
s ∈ 𝓤 α ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, dist a b < ε → (a, b) ∈ s :=
uniformity_basis_dist.mem_uniformity_iff
/-- A constant size neighborhood of the diagonal is an entourage. -/
theorem dist_mem_uniformity {ε : ℝ} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } ∈ 𝓤 α :=
mem_uniformity_dist.2 ⟨ε, ε0, fun _ _ ↦ id⟩
theorem uniformContinuous_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
UniformContinuous f ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, dist a b < δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε :=
uniformity_basis_dist.uniformContinuous_iff uniformity_basis_dist
theorem uniformContinuousOn_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
UniformContinuousOn f s ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, dist x y < δ → dist (f x) (f y) < ε :=
Metric.uniformity_basis_dist.uniformContinuousOn_iff Metric.uniformity_basis_dist
theorem uniformContinuousOn_iff_le [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
UniformContinuousOn f s ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, dist x y ≤ δ → dist (f x) (f y) ≤ ε :=
Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_le.uniformContinuousOn_iff Metric.uniformity_basis_dist_le
theorem nhds_basis_ball : (𝓝 x).HasBasis (0 < ·) (ball x) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist
theorem mem_nhds_iff : s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ball x ε ⊆ s :=
nhds_basis_ball.mem_iff
theorem eventually_nhds_iff {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, p y) ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ ⦃y⦄, dist y x < ε → p y :=
mem_nhds_iff
theorem eventually_nhds_iff_ball {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, p y) ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y ∈ ball x ε, p y :=
mem_nhds_iff
/-- A version of `Filter.eventually_prod_iff` where the first filter consists of neighborhoods
in a pseudo-metric space. -/
theorem eventually_nhds_prod_iff {f : Filter ι} {x₀ : α} {p : α × ι → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀ ×ˢ f, p x) ↔ ∃ ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃ pa : ι → Prop, (∀ᶠ i in f, pa i) ∧
∀ ⦃x⦄, dist x x₀ < ε → ∀ ⦃i⦄, pa i → p (x, i) := by
refine (nhds_basis_ball.prod f.basis_sets).eventually_iff.trans ?_
simp only [Prod.exists, forall_prod_set, id, mem_ball, and_assoc, exists_and_left, and_imp]
rfl
/-- A version of `Filter.eventually_prod_iff` where the second filter consists of neighborhoods
in a pseudo-metric space. -/
theorem eventually_prod_nhds_iff {f : Filter ι} {x₀ : α} {p : ι × α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ×ˢ 𝓝 x₀, p x) ↔ ∃ pa : ι → Prop, (∀ᶠ i in f, pa i) ∧
∃ ε > 0, ∀ ⦃i⦄, pa i → ∀ ⦃x⦄, dist x x₀ < ε → p (i, x) := by
rw [eventually_swap_iff, Metric.eventually_nhds_prod_iff]
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨a1, a2, a3, a4, a5⟩
exact ⟨a3, a4, a1, a2, fun _ b1 b2 b3 => a5 b3 b1⟩
theorem nhds_basis_closedBall : (𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) (closedBall x) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist_le
theorem nhds_basis_ball_inv_nat_succ :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => ball x (1 / (↑n + 1)) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_succ
theorem nhds_basis_ball_inv_nat_pos :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun n => 0 < n) fun n : ℕ => ball x (1 / ↑n) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity uniformity_basis_dist_inv_nat_pos
theorem nhds_basis_ball_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => ball x (r ^ n) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity (uniformity_basis_dist_pow h0 h1)
theorem nhds_basis_closedBall_pow {r : ℝ} (h0 : 0 < r) (h1 : r < 1) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => closedBall x (r ^ n) :=
nhds_basis_uniformity (uniformity_basis_dist_le_pow h0 h1)
theorem isOpen_iff : IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ ε > 0, ball x ε ⊆ s := by
simp only [isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, mem_nhds_iff]
@[simp] theorem isOpen_ball : IsOpen (ball x ε) :=
isOpen_iff.2 fun _ => exists_ball_subset_ball
theorem ball_mem_nhds (x : α) {ε : ℝ} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : ball x ε ∈ 𝓝 x :=
isOpen_ball.mem_nhds (mem_ball_self ε0)
theorem closedBall_mem_nhds (x : α) {ε : ℝ} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : closedBall x ε ∈ 𝓝 x :=
mem_of_superset (ball_mem_nhds x ε0) ball_subset_closedBall
theorem closedBall_mem_nhds_of_mem {x c : α} {ε : ℝ} (h : x ∈ ball c ε) : closedBall c ε ∈ 𝓝 x :=
mem_of_superset (isOpen_ball.mem_nhds h) ball_subset_closedBall
theorem nhdsWithin_basis_ball {s : Set α} :
(𝓝[s] x).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => ball x ε ∩ s :=
nhdsWithin_hasBasis nhds_basis_ball s
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff {t : Set α} : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ball x ε ∩ t ⊆ s :=
nhdsWithin_basis_ball.mem_iff
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhdsWithin [PseudoMetricSpace β] {t : Set β} {f : α → β} {a b} :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝[t] b) ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃x : α⦄, x ∈ s → dist x a < δ → f x ∈ t ∧ dist (f x) b < ε :=
(nhdsWithin_basis_ball.tendsto_iff nhdsWithin_basis_ball).trans <| by
simp only [inter_comm _ s, inter_comm _ t, mem_inter_iff, and_imp, gt_iff_lt, mem_ball]
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhds [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {a b} :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝 b) ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃x : α⦄, x ∈ s → dist x a < δ → dist (f x) b < ε := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ b, tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhdsWithin]
simp only [mem_univ, true_and]
theorem tendsto_nhds_nhds [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {a b} :
Tendsto f (𝓝 a) (𝓝 b) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃x : α⦄, dist x a < δ → dist (f x) b < ε :=
nhds_basis_ball.tendsto_iff nhds_basis_ball
theorem continuousAt_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {a : α} :
ContinuousAt f a ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃x : α⦄, dist x a < δ → dist (f x) (f a) < ε := by
rw [ContinuousAt, tendsto_nhds_nhds]
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s a ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ ⦃x : α⦄, x ∈ s → dist x a < δ → dist (f x) (f a) < ε := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhds]
theorem continuousOn_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ a ∈ s, dist a b < δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε := by
simp [ContinuousOn, continuousWithinAt_iff]
theorem continuous_iff [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ b, ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ a, dist a b < δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => tendsto_nhds_nhds
theorem tendsto_nhds {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in f, dist (u x) a < ε :=
nhds_basis_ball.tendsto_right_iff
theorem continuousAt_iff' [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} :
ContinuousAt f b ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 b, dist (f x) (f b) < ε := by
rw [ContinuousAt, tendsto_nhds]
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff' [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s b ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] b, dist (f x) (f b) < ε := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhds]
theorem continuousOn_iff' [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] b, dist (f x) (f b) < ε := by
simp [ContinuousOn, continuousWithinAt_iff']
theorem continuous_iff' [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ (a), ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, dist (f x) (f a) < ε :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => tendsto_nhds
theorem tendsto_atTop [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, dist (u n) a < ε :=
(atTop_basis.tendsto_iff nhds_basis_ball).trans <| by
simp only [true_and, mem_ball, mem_Ici]
/-- A variant of `tendsto_atTop` that
uses `∃ N, ∀ n > N, ...` rather than `∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, ...`
-/
theorem tendsto_atTop' [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] [NoMaxOrder β] {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ n > N, dist (u n) a < ε :=
(atTop_basis_Ioi.tendsto_iff nhds_basis_ball).trans <| by
simp only [true_and, gt_iff_lt, mem_Ioi, mem_ball]
theorem isOpen_singleton_iff {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] {x : α} :
IsOpen ({x} : Set α) ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y, dist y x < ε → y = x := by
simp [isOpen_iff, subset_singleton_iff, mem_ball]
theorem _root_.Dense.exists_dist_lt {s : Set α} (hs : Dense s) (x : α) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ y ∈ s, dist x y < ε := by
have : (ball x ε).Nonempty := by simp [hε]
simpa only [mem_ball'] using hs.exists_mem_open isOpen_ball this
nonrec theorem _root_.DenseRange.exists_dist_lt {β : Type*} {f : β → α} (hf : DenseRange f) (x : α)
{ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ y, dist x (f y) < ε :=
exists_range_iff.1 (hf.exists_dist_lt x hε)
/-- (Pseudo) metric space has discrete `UniformSpace` structure
iff the distances between distinct points are uniformly bounded away from zero. -/
protected lemma uniformSpace_eq_bot :
‹PseudoMetricSpace α›.toUniformSpace = ⊥ ↔
∃ r : ℝ, 0 < r ∧ Pairwise (r ≤ dist · · : α → α → Prop) := by
simp only [uniformity_basis_dist.uniformSpace_eq_bot, mem_setOf_eq, not_lt]
end Metric
open Metric
/-- If the distances between distinct points in a (pseudo) metric space
are uniformly bounded away from zero, then the space has discrete topology. -/
lemma DiscreteTopology.of_forall_le_dist {α} [PseudoMetricSpace α] {r : ℝ} (hpos : 0 < r)
(hr : Pairwise (r ≤ dist · · : α → α → Prop)) : DiscreteTopology α :=
⟨by rw [Metric.uniformSpace_eq_bot.2 ⟨r, hpos, hr⟩, UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace_bot]⟩
/- Instantiate a pseudometric space as a pseudoemetric space. Before we can state the instance,
we need to show that the uniform structure coming from the edistance and the
distance coincide. -/
theorem Metric.uniformity_edist_aux {α} (d : α → α → ℝ≥0) :
⨅ ε > (0 : ℝ), 𝓟 { p : α × α | ↑(d p.1 p.2) < ε } =
⨅ ε > (0 : ℝ≥0∞), 𝓟 { p : α × α | ↑(d p.1 p.2) < ε } := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_iInf_iff, le_principal_iff]
refine ⟨fun ε hε => ?_, fun ε hε => ?_⟩
· rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 hε with ⟨ε', ε'0, ε'ε⟩
refine mem_iInf_of_mem (ε' : ℝ) (mem_iInf_of_mem (ENNReal.coe_pos.1 ε'0) ?_)
exact fun x hx => lt_trans (ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.2 hx) ε'ε
· lift ε to ℝ≥0 using le_of_lt hε
refine mem_iInf_of_mem (ε : ℝ≥0∞) (mem_iInf_of_mem (ENNReal.coe_pos.2 hε) ?_)
exact fun _ => ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.1
theorem Metric.uniformity_edist : 𝓤 α = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by
simp only [PseudoMetricSpace.uniformity_dist, dist_nndist, edist_nndist,
Metric.uniformity_edist_aux]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- A pseudometric space induces a pseudoemetric space -/
instance (priority := 100) PseudoMetricSpace.toPseudoEMetricSpace : PseudoEMetricSpace α :=
{ ‹PseudoMetricSpace α› with
edist_self := by simp [edist_dist]
edist_comm := fun _ _ => by simp only [edist_dist, dist_comm]
edist_triangle := fun x y z => by
simp only [edist_dist, ← ENNReal.ofReal_add, dist_nonneg]
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff _]
· exact dist_triangle _ _ _
· simpa using add_le_add (dist_nonneg : 0 ≤ dist x y) dist_nonneg
uniformity_edist := Metric.uniformity_edist }
/-- In a pseudometric space, an open ball of infinite radius is the whole space -/
theorem Metric.eball_top_eq_univ (x : α) : EMetric.ball x ∞ = Set.univ :=
Set.eq_univ_iff_forall.mpr fun y => edist_lt_top y x
/-- Balls defined using the distance or the edistance coincide -/
@[simp]
theorem Metric.emetric_ball {x : α} {ε : ℝ} : EMetric.ball x (ENNReal.ofReal ε) = ball x ε := by
ext y
simp only [EMetric.mem_ball, mem_ball, edist_dist]
exact ENNReal.ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff_of_nonneg dist_nonneg
/-- Balls defined using the distance or the edistance coincide -/
@[simp]
theorem Metric.emetric_ball_nnreal {x : α} {ε : ℝ≥0} : EMetric.ball x ε = ball x ε := by
rw [← Metric.emetric_ball]
simp
/-- Closed balls defined using the distance or the edistance coincide -/
theorem Metric.emetric_closedBall {x : α} {ε : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ ε) :
EMetric.closedBall x (ENNReal.ofReal ε) = closedBall x ε := by
ext y; simp [edist_le_ofReal h]
/-- Closed balls defined using the distance or the edistance coincide -/
@[simp]
theorem Metric.emetric_closedBall_nnreal {x : α} {ε : ℝ≥0} :
EMetric.closedBall x ε = closedBall x ε := by
rw [← Metric.emetric_closedBall ε.coe_nonneg, ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal]
@[simp]
theorem Metric.emetric_ball_top (x : α) : EMetric.ball x ⊤ = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => edist_lt_top _ _
/-- Build a new pseudometric space from an old one where the bundled uniform structure is provably
(but typically non-definitionaly) equal to some given uniform structure.
See Note [forgetful inheritance].
See Note [reducible non-instances].
-/
abbrev PseudoMetricSpace.replaceUniformity {α} [U : UniformSpace α] (m : PseudoMetricSpace α)
(H : 𝓤[U] = 𝓤[PseudoEMetricSpace.toUniformSpace]) : PseudoMetricSpace α :=
{ m with
toUniformSpace := U
uniformity_dist := H.trans PseudoMetricSpace.uniformity_dist }
theorem PseudoMetricSpace.replaceUniformity_eq {α} [U : UniformSpace α] (m : PseudoMetricSpace α)
(H : 𝓤[U] = 𝓤[PseudoEMetricSpace.toUniformSpace]) : m.replaceUniformity H = m := by
ext
rfl
-- ensure that the bornology is unchanged when replacing the uniformity.
example {α} [U : UniformSpace α] (m : PseudoMetricSpace α)
(H : 𝓤[U] = 𝓤[PseudoEMetricSpace.toUniformSpace]) :
(PseudoMetricSpace.replaceUniformity m H).toBornology = m.toBornology := by
with_reducible_and_instances rfl
/-- Build a new pseudo metric space from an old one where the bundled topological structure is
provably (but typically non-definitionaly) equal to some given topological structure.
See Note [forgetful inheritance].
See Note [reducible non-instances].
-/
abbrev PseudoMetricSpace.replaceTopology {γ} [U : TopologicalSpace γ] (m : PseudoMetricSpace γ)
(H : U = m.toUniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace) : PseudoMetricSpace γ :=
@PseudoMetricSpace.replaceUniformity γ (m.toUniformSpace.replaceTopology H) m rfl
theorem PseudoMetricSpace.replaceTopology_eq {γ} [U : TopologicalSpace γ] (m : PseudoMetricSpace γ)
(H : U = m.toUniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace) : m.replaceTopology H = m := by
ext
rfl
/-- One gets a pseudometric space from an emetric space if the edistance
is everywhere finite, by pushing the edistance to reals. We set it up so that the edist and the
uniformity are defeq in the pseudometric space and the pseudoemetric space. In this definition, the
distance is given separately, to be able to prescribe some expression which is not defeq to the
push-forward of the edistance to reals. See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev PseudoEMetricSpace.toPseudoMetricSpaceOfDist {α : Type u} [e : PseudoEMetricSpace α]
(dist : α → α → ℝ) (edist_ne_top : ∀ x y : α, edist x y ≠ ⊤)
(h : ∀ x y, dist x y = ENNReal.toReal (edist x y)) : PseudoMetricSpace α where
dist := dist
dist_self x := by simp [h]
dist_comm x y := by simp [h, edist_comm]
dist_triangle x y z := by
simp only [h]
exact ENNReal.toReal_le_add (edist_triangle _ _ _) (edist_ne_top _ _) (edist_ne_top _ _)
edist := edist
edist_dist _ _ := by simp only [h, ENNReal.ofReal_toReal (edist_ne_top _ _)]
toUniformSpace := e.toUniformSpace
uniformity_dist := e.uniformity_edist.trans <| by
simpa only [ENNReal.coe_toNNReal (edist_ne_top _ _), h]
using (Metric.uniformity_edist_aux fun x y : α => (edist x y).toNNReal).symm
/-- One gets a pseudometric space from an emetric space if the edistance
is everywhere finite, by pushing the edistance to reals. We set it up so that the edist and the
uniformity are defeq in the pseudometric space and the emetric space. -/
abbrev PseudoEMetricSpace.toPseudoMetricSpace {α : Type u} [PseudoEMetricSpace α]
(h : ∀ x y : α, edist x y ≠ ⊤) : PseudoMetricSpace α :=
PseudoEMetricSpace.toPseudoMetricSpaceOfDist (fun x y => ENNReal.toReal (edist x y)) h fun _ _ =>
rfl
/-- Build a new pseudometric space from an old one where the bundled bornology structure is provably
(but typically non-definitionaly) equal to some given bornology structure.
See Note [forgetful inheritance].
See Note [reducible non-instances].
-/
abbrev PseudoMetricSpace.replaceBornology {α} [B : Bornology α] (m : PseudoMetricSpace α)
(H : ∀ s, @IsBounded _ B s ↔ @IsBounded _ PseudoMetricSpace.toBornology s) :
PseudoMetricSpace α :=
{ m with
toBornology := B
cobounded_sets := Set.ext <| compl_surjective.forall.2 fun s =>
(H s).trans <| by rw [isBounded_iff, mem_setOf_eq, compl_compl] }
theorem PseudoMetricSpace.replaceBornology_eq {α} [m : PseudoMetricSpace α] [B : Bornology α]
(H : ∀ s, @IsBounded _ B s ↔ @IsBounded _ PseudoMetricSpace.toBornology s) :
PseudoMetricSpace.replaceBornology _ H = m := by
ext
rfl
-- ensure that the uniformity is unchanged when replacing the bornology.
example {α} [B : Bornology α] (m : PseudoMetricSpace α)
(H : ∀ s, @IsBounded _ B s ↔ @IsBounded _ PseudoMetricSpace.toBornology s) :
(PseudoMetricSpace.replaceBornology m H).toUniformSpace = m.toUniformSpace := by
with_reducible_and_instances rfl
section Real
/-- Instantiate the reals as a pseudometric space. -/
instance Real.pseudoMetricSpace : PseudoMetricSpace ℝ where
dist x y := |x - y|
dist_self := by simp [abs_zero]
dist_comm _ _ := abs_sub_comm _ _
dist_triangle _ _ _ := abs_sub_le _ _ _
theorem Real.dist_eq (x y : ℝ) : dist x y = |x - y| := rfl
theorem Real.nndist_eq (x y : ℝ) : nndist x y = Real.nnabs (x - y) := rfl
theorem Real.nndist_eq' (x y : ℝ) : nndist x y = Real.nnabs (y - x) :=
nndist_comm _ _
theorem Real.dist_0_eq_abs (x : ℝ) : dist x 0 = |x| := by simp [Real.dist_eq]
theorem Real.sub_le_dist (x y : ℝ) : x - y ≤ dist x y := by
rw [Real.dist_eq, le_abs]
exact Or.inl (le_refl _)
theorem Real.ball_eq_Ioo (x r : ℝ) : ball x r = Ioo (x - r) (x + r) :=
Set.ext fun y => by
rw [mem_ball, dist_comm, Real.dist_eq, abs_sub_lt_iff, mem_Ioo, ← sub_lt_iff_lt_add',
sub_lt_comm]
theorem Real.closedBall_eq_Icc {x r : ℝ} : closedBall x r = Icc (x - r) (x + r) := by
ext y
rw [mem_closedBall, dist_comm, Real.dist_eq, abs_sub_le_iff, mem_Icc, ← sub_le_iff_le_add',
sub_le_comm]
theorem Real.Ioo_eq_ball (x y : ℝ) : Ioo x y = ball ((x + y) / 2) ((y - x) / 2) := by
rw [Real.ball_eq_Ioo, ← sub_div, add_comm, ← sub_add, add_sub_cancel_left, add_self_div_two,
← add_div, add_assoc, add_sub_cancel, add_self_div_two]
theorem Real.Icc_eq_closedBall (x y : ℝ) : Icc x y = closedBall ((x + y) / 2) ((y - x) / 2) := by
rw [Real.closedBall_eq_Icc, ← sub_div, add_comm, ← sub_add, add_sub_cancel_left, add_self_div_two,
← add_div, add_assoc, add_sub_cancel, add_self_div_two]
theorem Metric.uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero :
𝓤 α = comap (fun p : α × α => dist p.1 p.2) (𝓝 (0 : ℝ)) := by
ext s
simp only [mem_uniformity_dist, (nhds_basis_ball.comap _).mem_iff]
simp [subset_def, Real.dist_0_eq_abs]
theorem tendsto_uniformity_iff_dist_tendsto_zero {f : ι → α × α} {p : Filter ι} :
Tendsto f p (𝓤 α) ↔ Tendsto (fun x => dist (f x).1 (f x).2) p (𝓝 0) := by
rw [Metric.uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero, tendsto_comap_iff, Function.comp_def]
theorem Filter.Tendsto.congr_dist {f₁ f₂ : ι → α} {p : Filter ι} {a : α}
(h₁ : Tendsto f₁ p (𝓝 a)) (h : Tendsto (fun x => dist (f₁ x) (f₂ x)) p (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto f₂ p (𝓝 a) :=
h₁.congr_uniformity <| tendsto_uniformity_iff_dist_tendsto_zero.2 h
alias tendsto_of_tendsto_of_dist := Filter.Tendsto.congr_dist
theorem tendsto_iff_of_dist {f₁ f₂ : ι → α} {p : Filter ι} {a : α}
(h : Tendsto (fun x => dist (f₁ x) (f₂ x)) p (𝓝 0)) : Tendsto f₁ p (𝓝 a) ↔ Tendsto f₂ p (𝓝 a) :=
Uniform.tendsto_congr <| tendsto_uniformity_iff_dist_tendsto_zero.2 h
end Real
theorem PseudoMetricSpace.dist_eq_of_dist_zero (x : α) {y z : α} (h : dist y z = 0) :
dist x y = dist x z :=
dist_comm y x ▸ dist_comm z x ▸ sub_eq_zero.1 (abs_nonpos_iff.1 (h ▸ abs_dist_sub_le y z x))
theorem dist_dist_dist_le_left (x y z : α) : dist (dist x z) (dist y z) ≤ dist x y :=
abs_dist_sub_le ..
theorem dist_dist_dist_le_right (x y z : α) : dist (dist x y) (dist x z) ≤ dist y z := by
simpa only [dist_comm x] using dist_dist_dist_le_left y z x
theorem dist_dist_dist_le (x y x' y' : α) : dist (dist x y) (dist x' y') ≤ dist x x' + dist y y' :=
(dist_triangle _ _ _).trans <|
add_le_add (dist_dist_dist_le_left _ _ _) (dist_dist_dist_le_right _ _ _)
theorem nhds_comap_dist (a : α) : ((𝓝 (0 : ℝ)).comap (dist · a)) = 𝓝 a := by
simp only [@nhds_eq_comap_uniformity α, Metric.uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero, comap_comap,
Function.comp_def, dist_comm]
theorem tendsto_iff_dist_tendsto_zero {f : β → α} {x : Filter β} {a : α} :
Tendsto f x (𝓝 a) ↔ Tendsto (fun b => dist (f b) a) x (𝓝 0) := by
rw [← nhds_comap_dist a, tendsto_comap_iff, Function.comp_def]
namespace Metric
variable {x y z : α} {ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ} {s : Set α}
theorem ball_subset_interior_closedBall : ball x ε ⊆ interior (closedBall x ε) :=
interior_maximal ball_subset_closedBall isOpen_ball
/-- ε-characterization of the closure in pseudometric spaces -/
theorem mem_closure_iff {s : Set α} {a : α} : a ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ b ∈ s, dist a b < ε :=
(mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis nhds_basis_ball).trans <| by simp only [mem_ball, dist_comm]
theorem mem_closure_range_iff {e : β → α} {a : α} :
a ∈ closure (range e) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ k : β, dist a (e k) < ε := by
simp only [mem_closure_iff, exists_range_iff]
theorem mem_closure_range_iff_nat {e : β → α} {a : α} :
a ∈ closure (range e) ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ∃ k : β, dist a (e k) < 1 / ((n : ℝ) + 1) :=
(mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis nhds_basis_ball_inv_nat_succ).trans <| by
simp only [mem_ball, dist_comm, exists_range_iff, forall_const]
theorem mem_of_closed' {s : Set α} (hs : IsClosed s) {a : α} :
a ∈ s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ b ∈ s, dist a b < ε := by
simpa only [hs.closure_eq] using @mem_closure_iff _ _ s a
theorem dense_iff {s : Set α} : Dense s ↔ ∀ x, ∀ r > 0, (ball x r ∩ s).Nonempty :=
forall_congr' fun x => by
simp only [mem_closure_iff, Set.Nonempty, exists_prop, mem_inter_iff, mem_ball', and_comm]
theorem dense_iff_iUnion_ball (s : Set α) : Dense s ↔ ∀ r > 0, ⋃ c ∈ s, ball c r = univ := by
simp_rw [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_iUnion, exists_prop, mem_ball, Dense, mem_closure_iff,
forall_comm (α := α)]
theorem denseRange_iff {f : β → α} : DenseRange f ↔ ∀ x, ∀ r > 0, ∃ y, dist x (f y) < r :=
forall_congr' fun x => by simp only [mem_closure_iff, exists_range_iff]
end Metric
open Additive Multiplicative
instance : PseudoMetricSpace (Additive α) := ‹_›
instance : PseudoMetricSpace (Multiplicative α) := ‹_›
section
variable [PseudoMetricSpace X]
@[simp] theorem nndist_ofMul (a b : X) : nndist (ofMul a) (ofMul b) = nndist a b := rfl
@[simp] theorem nndist_ofAdd (a b : X) : nndist (ofAdd a) (ofAdd b) = nndist a b := rfl
@[simp] theorem nndist_toMul (a b : Additive X) : nndist a.toMul b.toMul = nndist a b := rfl
@[simp]
theorem nndist_toAdd (a b : Multiplicative X) : nndist a.toAdd b.toAdd = nndist a b := rfl
end
open OrderDual
instance : PseudoMetricSpace αᵒᵈ := ‹_›
section
variable [PseudoMetricSpace X]
@[simp] theorem nndist_toDual (a b : X) : nndist (toDual a) (toDual b) = nndist a b := rfl
@[simp] theorem nndist_ofDual (a b : Xᵒᵈ) : nndist (ofDual a) (ofDual b) = nndist a b := rfl
end
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Pseudo/Defs.lean | 1,229 | 1,231 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Unbundled.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Sub.Defs
import Mathlib.Util.AssertExists
/-!
# Ordered groups
This file defines bundled ordered groups and develops a few basic results.
## Implementation details
Unfortunately, the number of `'` appended to lemmas in this file
may differ between the multiplicative and the additive version of a lemma.
The reason is that we did not want to change existing names in the library.
-/
/-
`NeZero` theory should not be needed at this point in the ordered algebraic hierarchy.
-/
assert_not_imported Mathlib.Algebra.NeZero
open Function
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
/-- An ordered additive commutative group is an additive commutative group
with a partial order in which addition is strictly monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[AddCommGroup α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure OrderedAddCommGroup (α : Type u) extends AddCommGroup α, PartialOrder α where
/-- Addition is monotone in an ordered additive commutative group. -/
protected add_le_add_left : ∀ a b : α, a ≤ b → ∀ c : α, c + a ≤ c + b
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
/-- An ordered commutative group is a commutative group
with a partial order in which multiplication is strictly monotone. -/
@[to_additive,
deprecated "Use `[CommGroup α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure OrderedCommGroup (α : Type u) extends CommGroup α, PartialOrder α where
/-- Multiplication is monotone in an ordered commutative group. -/
protected mul_le_mul_left : ∀ a b : α, a ≤ b → ∀ c : α, c * a ≤ c * b
alias OrderedCommGroup.mul_lt_mul_left' := mul_lt_mul_left'
attribute [to_additive OrderedAddCommGroup.add_lt_add_left] OrderedCommGroup.mul_lt_mul_left'
alias OrderedCommGroup.le_of_mul_le_mul_left := le_of_mul_le_mul_left'
attribute [to_additive] OrderedCommGroup.le_of_mul_le_mul_left
alias OrderedCommGroup.lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left := lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left'
attribute [to_additive] OrderedCommGroup.lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive IsOrderedAddMonoid.toIsOrderedCancelAddMonoid]
instance (priority := 100) IsOrderedMonoid.toIsOrderedCancelMonoid
[CommGroup α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α] : IsOrderedCancelMonoid α where
le_of_mul_le_mul_left a b c bc := by simpa using mul_le_mul_left' bc a⁻¹
le_of_mul_le_mul_right a b c bc := by simpa using mul_le_mul_left' bc a⁻¹
/-!
### Linearly ordered commutative groups
-/
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A linearly ordered additive commutative group is an
additive commutative group with a linear order in which
addition is monotone. -/
@[deprecated "Use `[AddCommGroup α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure LinearOrderedAddCommGroup (α : Type u) extends OrderedAddCommGroup α, LinearOrder α
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- A linearly ordered commutative group is a
commutative group with a linear order in which
multiplication is monotone. -/
@[to_additive,
deprecated "Use `[CommGroup α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α]` instead."
(since := "2025-04-10")]
structure LinearOrderedCommGroup (α : Type u) extends OrderedCommGroup α, LinearOrder α
attribute [nolint docBlame]
LinearOrderedCommGroup.toLinearOrder LinearOrderedAddCommGroup.toLinearOrder
section LinearOrderedCommGroup
variable [CommGroup α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α] {a : α}
@[to_additive LinearOrderedAddCommGroup.add_lt_add_left]
theorem LinearOrderedCommGroup.mul_lt_mul_left' (a b : α) (h : a < b) (c : α) : c * a < c * b :=
_root_.mul_lt_mul_left' h c
@[to_additive eq_zero_of_neg_eq]
theorem eq_one_of_inv_eq' (h : a⁻¹ = a) : a = 1 :=
match lt_trichotomy a 1 with
| Or.inl h₁ =>
have : 1 < a := h ▸ one_lt_inv_of_inv h₁
absurd h₁ this.asymm
| Or.inr (Or.inl h₁) => h₁
| Or.inr (Or.inr h₁) =>
have : a < 1 := h ▸ inv_lt_one'.mpr h₁
absurd h₁ this.asymm
@[to_additive exists_zero_lt]
theorem exists_one_lt' [Nontrivial α] : ∃ a : α, 1 < a := by
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := Decidable.exists_ne (1 : α)
obtain h|h := hy.lt_or_lt
· exact ⟨y⁻¹, one_lt_inv'.mpr h⟩
· exact ⟨y, h⟩
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) LinearOrderedCommGroup.to_noMaxOrder [Nontrivial α] : NoMaxOrder α :=
⟨by
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ : ∃ a : α, 1 < a := exists_one_lt'
exact fun a => ⟨a * y, lt_mul_of_one_lt_right' a hy⟩⟩
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) LinearOrderedCommGroup.to_noMinOrder [Nontrivial α] : NoMinOrder α :=
⟨by
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ : ∃ a : α, 1 < a := exists_one_lt'
exact fun a => ⟨a / y, (div_lt_self_iff a).mpr hy⟩⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_le_self_iff : a⁻¹ ≤ a ↔ 1 ≤ a := by simp [inv_le_iff_one_le_mul']
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_lt_self_iff : a⁻¹ < a ↔ 1 < a := by simp [inv_lt_iff_one_lt_mul]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem le_inv_self_iff : a ≤ a⁻¹ ↔ a ≤ 1 := by simp [← not_iff_not]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lt_inv_self_iff : a < a⁻¹ ↔ a < 1 := by simp [← not_iff_not]
end LinearOrderedCommGroup
section NormNumLemmas
/- The following lemmas are stated so that the `norm_num` tactic can use them with the
expected signatures. -/
variable [CommGroup α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α] {a b : α}
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) neg_le_neg]
theorem inv_le_inv' : a ≤ b → b⁻¹ ≤ a⁻¹ :=
inv_le_inv_iff.mpr
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) neg_lt_neg]
theorem inv_lt_inv' : a < b → b⁻¹ < a⁻¹ :=
inv_lt_inv_iff.mpr
-- The additive version is also a `linarith` lemma.
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_lt_one_of_one_lt : 1 < a → a⁻¹ < 1 :=
inv_lt_one_iff_one_lt.mpr
-- The additive version is also a `linarith` lemma.
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_le_one_of_one_le : 1 ≤ a → a⁻¹ ≤ 1 :=
inv_le_one'.mpr
@[to_additive neg_nonneg_of_nonpos]
theorem one_le_inv_of_le_one : a ≤ 1 → 1 ≤ a⁻¹ :=
one_le_inv'.mpr
end NormNumLemmas
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Group/Defs.lean | 920 | 921 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation.CondexpL1
/-! # Conditional expectation
We build the conditional expectation of an integrable function `f` with value in a Banach space
with respect to a measure `μ` (defined on a measurable space structure `m₀`) and a measurable space
structure `m` with `hm : m ≤ m₀` (a sub-sigma-algebra). This is an `m`-strongly measurable
function `μ[f|hm]` which is integrable and verifies `∫ x in s, μ[f|hm] x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ`
for all `m`-measurable sets `s`. It is unique as an element of `L¹`.
The construction is done in four steps:
* Define the conditional expectation of an `L²` function, as an element of `L²`. This is the
orthogonal projection on the subspace of almost everywhere `m`-measurable functions.
* Show that the conditional expectation of the indicator of a measurable set with finite measure
is integrable and define a map `Set α → (E →L[ℝ] (α →₁[μ] E))` which to a set associates a linear
map. That linear map sends `x ∈ E` to the conditional expectation of the indicator of the set
with value `x`.
* Extend that map to `condExpL1CLM : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] (α →₁[μ] E)`. This is done using the same
construction as the Bochner integral (see the file `MeasureTheory/Integral/SetToL1`).
* Define the conditional expectation of a function `f : α → E`, which is an integrable function
`α → E` equal to 0 if `f` is not integrable, and equal to an `m`-measurable representative of
`condExpL1CLM` applied to `[f]`, the equivalence class of `f` in `L¹`.
The first step is done in `MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation.CondexpL2`, the two
next steps in `MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation.CondexpL1` and the final step is
performed in this file.
## Main results
The conditional expectation and its properties
* `condExp (m : MeasurableSpace α) (μ : Measure α) (f : α → E)`: conditional expectation of `f`
with respect to `m`.
* `integrable_condExp` : `condExp` is integrable.
* `stronglyMeasurable_condExp` : `condExp` is `m`-strongly-measurable.
* `setIntegral_condExp (hf : Integrable f μ) (hs : MeasurableSet[m] s)` : if `m ≤ m₀` (the
σ-algebra over which the measure is defined), then the conditional expectation verifies
`∫ x in s, condExp m μ f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ` for any `m`-measurable set `s`.
While `condExp` is function-valued, we also define `condExpL1` with value in `L1` and a continuous
linear map `condExpL1CLM` from `L1` to `L1`. `condExp` should be used in most cases.
Uniqueness of the conditional expectation
* `ae_eq_condExp_of_forall_setIntegral_eq`: an a.e. `m`-measurable function which verifies the
equality of integrals is a.e. equal to `condExp`.
## Notations
For a measure `μ` defined on a measurable space structure `m₀`, another measurable space structure
`m` with `hm : m ≤ m₀` (a sub-σ-algebra) and a function `f`, we define the notation
* `μ[f|m] = condExp m μ f`.
## TODO
See https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/217875-Is-there-code-for-X.3F/topic/Conditional.20expectation.20of.20product
for how to prove that we can pull `m`-measurable continuous linear maps out of the `m`-conditional
expectation. This would generalise `MeasureTheory.condExp_mul_of_stronglyMeasurable_left`.
## Tags
conditional expectation, conditional expected value
-/
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory.Lp Filter
open scoped ENNReal Topology MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
-- 𝕜 for ℝ or ℂ
-- E for integrals on a Lp submodule
variable {α β E 𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] {m m₀ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f g : α → E}
{s : Set α}
section NormedAddCommGroup
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [CompleteSpace E]
open scoped Classical in
variable (m) in
/-- Conditional expectation of a function, with notation `μ[f|m]`.
It is defined as 0 if any one of the following conditions is true:
- `m` is not a sub-σ-algebra of `m₀`,
- `μ` is not σ-finite with respect to `m`,
- `f` is not integrable. -/
noncomputable irreducible_def condExp (μ : Measure[m₀] α) (f : α → E) : α → E :=
if hm : m ≤ m₀ then
if h : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm) ∧ Integrable f μ then
if StronglyMeasurable[m] f then f
else have := h.1; aestronglyMeasurable_condExpL1.mk (condExpL1 hm μ f)
else 0
else 0
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias condexp := condExp
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.condExp]
scoped macro:max μ:term noWs "[" f:term "|" m:term "]" : term =>
`(MeasureTheory.condExp $m $μ $f)
/-- Unexpander for `μ[f|m]` notation. -/
@[app_unexpander MeasureTheory.condExp]
def condExpUnexpander : Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander
| `($_ $m $μ $f) => `($μ[$f|$m])
| _ => throw ()
/-- info: μ[f|m] : α → E -/
#guard_msgs in
#check μ[f | m]
/-- info: μ[f|m] sorry : E -/
#guard_msgs in
#check μ[f | m] (sorry : α)
theorem condExp_of_not_le (hm_not : ¬m ≤ m₀) : μ[f|m] = 0 := by rw [condExp, dif_neg hm_not]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias condexp_of_not_le := condExp_of_not_le
theorem condExp_of_not_sigmaFinite (hm : m ≤ m₀) (hμm_not : ¬SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)) :
μ[f|m] = 0 := by rw [condExp, dif_pos hm, dif_neg]; push_neg; exact fun h => absurd h hμm_not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite := condExp_of_not_sigmaFinite
open scoped Classical in
theorem condExp_of_sigmaFinite (hm : m ≤ m₀) [hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] :
μ[f|m] =
if Integrable f μ then
if StronglyMeasurable[m] f then f
else aestronglyMeasurable_condExpL1.mk (condExpL1 hm μ f)
else 0 := by
rw [condExp, dif_pos hm]
simp only [hμm, Ne, true_and]
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· rw [dif_pos hf, if_pos hf]
· rw [dif_neg hf, if_neg hf]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias condexp_of_sigmaFinite := condExp_of_sigmaFinite
theorem condExp_of_stronglyMeasurable (hm : m ≤ m₀) [hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] {f : α → E}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (hfi : Integrable f μ) : μ[f|m] = f := by
rw [condExp_of_sigmaFinite hm, if_pos hfi, if_pos hf]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias condexp_of_stronglyMeasurable := condExp_of_stronglyMeasurable
@[simp]
theorem condExp_const (hm : m ≤ m₀) (c : E) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] : μ[fun _ : α ↦ c|m] = fun _ ↦ c :=
condExp_of_stronglyMeasurable hm stronglyMeasurable_const (integrable_const c)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias condexp_const := condExp_const
theorem condExp_ae_eq_condExpL1 (hm : m ≤ m₀) [hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] (f : α → E) :
μ[f|m] =ᵐ[μ] condExpL1 hm μ f := by
rw [condExp_of_sigmaFinite hm]
by_cases hfi : Integrable f μ
· rw [if_pos hfi]
by_cases hfm : StronglyMeasurable[m] f
· rw [if_pos hfm]
exact (condExpL1_of_aestronglyMeasurable' hfm.aestronglyMeasurable hfi).symm
· rw [if_neg hfm]
exact aestronglyMeasurable_condExpL1.ae_eq_mk.symm
rw [if_neg hfi, condExpL1_undef hfi]
exact (coeFn_zero _ _ _).symm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1 := condExp_ae_eq_condExpL1
theorem condExp_ae_eq_condExpL1CLM (hm : m ≤ m₀) [SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] (hf : Integrable f μ) :
μ[f|m] =ᵐ[μ] condExpL1CLM E hm μ (hf.toL1 f) := by
refine (condExp_ae_eq_condExpL1 hm f).trans (Eventually.of_forall fun x => ?_)
rw [condExpL1_eq hf]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1CLM := condExp_ae_eq_condExpL1CLM
theorem condExp_of_not_integrable (hf : ¬Integrable f μ) : μ[f|m] = 0 := by
by_cases hm : m ≤ m₀
swap; · rw [condExp_of_not_le hm]
by_cases hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)
swap; · rw [condExp_of_not_sigmaFinite hm hμm]
rw [condExp_of_sigmaFinite, if_neg hf]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias condexp_undef := condExp_of_not_integrable
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias condExp_undef := condExp_of_not_integrable
@[simp]
theorem condExp_zero : μ[(0 : α → E)|m] = 0 := by
by_cases hm : m ≤ m₀
swap; · rw [condExp_of_not_le hm]
by_cases hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)
swap; · rw [condExp_of_not_sigmaFinite hm hμm]
exact condExp_of_stronglyMeasurable hm stronglyMeasurable_zero (integrable_zero _ _ _)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias condexp_zero := condExp_zero
theorem stronglyMeasurable_condExp : StronglyMeasurable[m] (μ[f|m]) := by
by_cases hm : m ≤ m₀
swap; · rw [condExp_of_not_le hm]; exact stronglyMeasurable_zero
by_cases hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)
swap; · rw [condExp_of_not_sigmaFinite hm hμm]; exact stronglyMeasurable_zero
rw [condExp_of_sigmaFinite hm]
split_ifs with hfi hfm
· exact hfm
· exact aestronglyMeasurable_condExpL1.stronglyMeasurable_mk
· exact stronglyMeasurable_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias stronglyMeasurable_condexp := stronglyMeasurable_condExp
theorem condExp_congr_ae (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : μ[f|m] =ᵐ[μ] μ[g|m] := by
by_cases hm : m ≤ m₀
swap; · simp_rw [condExp_of_not_le hm]; rfl
by_cases hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)
swap; · simp_rw [condExp_of_not_sigmaFinite hm hμm]; rfl
exact (condExp_ae_eq_condExpL1 hm f).trans
(Filter.EventuallyEq.trans (by rw [condExpL1_congr_ae hm h])
(condExp_ae_eq_condExpL1 hm g).symm)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias condexp_congr_ae := condExp_congr_ae
lemma condExp_congr_ae_trim (hm : m ≤ m₀) (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
μ[f|m] =ᵐ[μ.trim hm] μ[g|m] :=
StronglyMeasurable.ae_eq_trim_of_stronglyMeasurable hm
stronglyMeasurable_condExp stronglyMeasurable_condExp (condExp_congr_ae hfg)
theorem condExp_of_aestronglyMeasurable' (hm : m ≤ m₀) [hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] {f : α → E}
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable[m] f μ) (hfi : Integrable f μ) : μ[f|m] =ᵐ[μ] f := by
refine ((condExp_congr_ae hf.ae_eq_mk).trans ?_).trans hf.ae_eq_mk.symm
rw [condExp_of_stronglyMeasurable hm hf.stronglyMeasurable_mk
((integrable_congr hf.ae_eq_mk).mp hfi)]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias condexp_of_aestronglyMeasurable' := condExp_of_aestronglyMeasurable'
@[fun_prop]
theorem integrable_condExp : Integrable (μ[f|m]) μ := by
by_cases hm : m ≤ m₀
swap; · rw [condExp_of_not_le hm]; exact integrable_zero _ _ _
by_cases hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)
swap; · rw [condExp_of_not_sigmaFinite hm hμm]; exact integrable_zero _ _ _
exact (integrable_condExpL1 f).congr (condExp_ae_eq_condExpL1 hm f).symm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias integrable_condexp := integrable_condExp
/-- The integral of the conditional expectation `μ[f|hm]` over an `m`-measurable set is equal to
the integral of `f` on that set. -/
theorem setIntegral_condExp (hm : m ≤ m₀) [SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] (hf : Integrable f μ)
(hs : MeasurableSet[m] s) : ∫ x in s, (μ[f|m]) x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ := by
rw [setIntegral_congr_ae (hm s hs) ((condExp_ae_eq_condExpL1 hm f).mono fun x hx _ => hx)]
exact setIntegral_condExpL1 hf hs
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias setIntegral_condexp := setIntegral_condExp
theorem integral_condExp (hm : m ≤ m₀) [hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] :
∫ x, (μ[f|m]) x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· suffices ∫ x in Set.univ, (μ[f|m]) x ∂μ = ∫ x in Set.univ, f x ∂μ by
simp_rw [setIntegral_univ] at this; exact this
exact setIntegral_condExp hm hf .univ
simp only [condExp_of_not_integrable hf, Pi.zero_apply, integral_zero, integral_undef hf]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias integral_condexp := integral_condExp
/-- **Law of total probability** using `condExp` as conditional probability. -/
theorem integral_condExp_indicator [mβ : MeasurableSpace β] {Y : α → β} (hY : Measurable Y)
[SigmaFinite (μ.trim hY.comap_le)] {A : Set α} (hA : MeasurableSet A) :
∫ x, (μ[(A.indicator fun _ ↦ (1 : ℝ)) | mβ.comap Y]) x ∂μ = μ.real A := by
rw [integral_condExp, integral_indicator hA, setIntegral_const, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias integral_condexp_indicator := integral_condExp_indicator
/-- **Uniqueness of the conditional expectation**
If a function is a.e. `m`-measurable, verifies an integrability condition and has same integral
as `f` on all `m`-measurable sets, then it is a.e. equal to `μ[f|hm]`. -/
theorem ae_eq_condExp_of_forall_setIntegral_eq (hm : m ≤ m₀) [SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)]
{f g : α → E} (hf : Integrable f μ)
(hg_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet[m] s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn g s μ)
(hg_eq : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet[m] s → μ s < ∞ → ∫ x in s, g x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ)
(hgm : AEStronglyMeasurable[m] g μ) : g =ᵐ[μ] μ[f|m] := by
refine ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_of_sigmaFinite' hm hg_int_finite
(fun s _ _ => integrable_condExp.integrableOn) (fun s hs hμs => ?_) hgm
(StronglyMeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable stronglyMeasurable_condExp)
rw [hg_eq s hs hμs, setIntegral_condExp hm hf hs]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")]
alias ae_eq_condexp_of_forall_setIntegral_eq := ae_eq_condExp_of_forall_setIntegral_eq
theorem condExp_bot' [hμ : NeZero μ] (f : α → E) :
μ[f|⊥] = fun _ => (μ.real Set.univ)⁻¹ • ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
by_cases hμ_finite : IsFiniteMeasure μ
swap
· have h : ¬SigmaFinite (μ.trim bot_le) := by rwa [sigmaFinite_trim_bot_iff]
rw [not_isFiniteMeasure_iff] at hμ_finite
rw [condExp_of_not_sigmaFinite bot_le h]
simp only [hμ_finite, ENNReal.toReal_top, inv_zero, zero_smul, measureReal_def]
rfl
have h_meas : StronglyMeasurable[⊥] (μ[f|⊥]) := stronglyMeasurable_condExp
obtain ⟨c, h_eq⟩ := stronglyMeasurable_bot_iff.mp h_meas
rw [h_eq]
have h_integral : ∫ x, (μ[f|⊥]) x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ := integral_condExp bot_le
simp_rw [h_eq, integral_const] at h_integral
rw [← h_integral, ← smul_assoc, smul_eq_mul, inv_mul_cancel₀, one_smul]
rw [Ne, measureReal_def, ENNReal.toReal_eq_zero_iff, not_or]
exact ⟨NeZero.ne _, measure_ne_top μ Set.univ⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias condexp_bot' := condExp_bot'
theorem condExp_bot_ae_eq (f : α → E) :
μ[f|⊥] =ᵐ[μ] fun _ => (μ.real Set.univ)⁻¹ • ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
rcases eq_zero_or_neZero μ with rfl | hμ
· rw [ae_zero]; exact eventually_bot
· exact Eventually.of_forall <| congr_fun (condExp_bot' f)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias condexp_bot_ae_eq := condExp_bot_ae_eq
theorem condExp_bot [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (f : α → E) : μ[f|⊥] = fun _ => ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
refine (condExp_bot' f).trans ?_
rw [measureReal_univ_eq_one, inv_one, one_smul]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias condexp_bot := condExp_bot
theorem condExp_add (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) (m : MeasurableSpace α) :
μ[f + g|m] =ᵐ[μ] μ[f|m] + μ[g|m] := by
by_cases hm : m ≤ m₀
swap; · simp_rw [condExp_of_not_le hm]; simp
by_cases hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)
swap; · simp_rw [condExp_of_not_sigmaFinite hm hμm]; simp
refine (condExp_ae_eq_condExpL1 hm _).trans ?_
rw [condExpL1_add hf hg]
exact (coeFn_add _ _).trans
((condExp_ae_eq_condExpL1 hm _).symm.add (condExp_ae_eq_condExpL1 hm _).symm)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias condexp_add := condExp_add
theorem condExp_finset_sum {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → α → E}
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, Integrable (f i) μ) (m : MeasurableSpace α) :
μ[∑ i ∈ s, f i|m] =ᵐ[μ] ∑ i ∈ s, μ[f i|m] := by
classical
induction s using Finset.induction_on with
| empty => rw [Finset.sum_empty, Finset.sum_empty, condExp_zero]
| insert i s his heq =>
rw [Finset.sum_insert his, Finset.sum_insert his]
exact (condExp_add (hf i <| Finset.mem_insert_self i s)
(integrable_finset_sum' _ <| Finset.forall_of_forall_insert hf) _).trans
((EventuallyEq.refl _ _).add <| heq <| Finset.forall_of_forall_insert hf)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias condexp_finset_sum := condExp_finset_sum
theorem condExp_smul [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] (c : 𝕜) (f : α → E) (m : MeasurableSpace α) :
μ[c • f|m] =ᵐ[μ] c • μ[f|m] := by
by_cases hm : m ≤ m₀
swap; · simp_rw [condExp_of_not_le hm]; simp
by_cases hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)
swap; · simp_rw [condExp_of_not_sigmaFinite hm hμm]; simp
refine (condExp_ae_eq_condExpL1 hm _).trans ?_
rw [condExpL1_smul c f]
refine (condExp_ae_eq_condExpL1 hm f).mp ?_
refine (coeFn_smul c (condExpL1 hm μ f)).mono fun x hx1 hx2 => ?_
simp only [hx1, hx2, Pi.smul_apply]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias condexp_smul := condExp_smul
theorem condExp_neg (f : α → E) (m : MeasurableSpace α) : μ[-f|m] =ᵐ[μ] -μ[f|m] := by
calc
μ[-f|m] = μ[(-1 : ℝ) • f|m] := by rw [neg_one_smul ℝ f]
_ =ᵐ[μ] (-1 : ℝ) • μ[f|m] := condExp_smul ..
_ = -μ[f|m] := neg_one_smul ℝ (μ[f|m])
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias condexp_neg := condExp_neg
|
theorem condExp_sub (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) (m : MeasurableSpace α) :
μ[f - g|m] =ᵐ[μ] μ[f|m] - μ[g|m] := by
simp_rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
exact (condExp_add hf hg.neg _).trans (EventuallyEq.rfl.add (condExp_neg ..))
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/ConditionalExpectation/Basic.lean | 370 | 375 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.HurwitzZeta
import Mathlib.Analysis.PSeriesComplex
/-!
# Definition of the Riemann zeta function
## Main definitions:
* `riemannZeta`: the Riemann zeta function `ζ : ℂ → ℂ`.
* `completedRiemannZeta`: the completed zeta function `Λ : ℂ → ℂ`, which satisfies
`Λ(s) = π ^ (-s / 2) Γ(s / 2) ζ(s)` (away from the poles of `Γ(s / 2)`).
* `completedRiemannZeta₀`: the entire function `Λ₀` satisfying
`Λ₀(s) = Λ(s) + 1 / (s - 1) - 1 / s` wherever the RHS is defined.
Note that mathematically `ζ(s)` is undefined at `s = 1`, while `Λ(s)` is undefined at both `s = 0`
and `s = 1`. Our construction assigns some values at these points; exact formulae involving the
Euler-Mascheroni constant will follow in a subsequent PR.
## Main results:
* `differentiable_completedZeta₀` : the function `Λ₀(s)` is entire.
* `differentiableAt_completedZeta` : the function `Λ(s)` is differentiable away from `s = 0` and
`s = 1`.
* `differentiableAt_riemannZeta` : the function `ζ(s)` is differentiable away from `s = 1`.
* `zeta_eq_tsum_one_div_nat_add_one_cpow` : for `1 < re s`, we have
`ζ(s) = ∑' (n : ℕ), 1 / (n + 1) ^ s`.
* `completedRiemannZeta₀_one_sub`, `completedRiemannZeta_one_sub`, and `riemannZeta_one_sub` :
functional equation relating values at `s` and `1 - s`
For special-value formulae expressing `ζ (2 * k)` and `ζ (1 - 2 * k)` in terms of Bernoulli numbers
see `Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.HurwitzZetaValues`. For computation of the constant term as
`s → 1`, see `Mathlib.NumberTheory.Harmonic.ZetaAsymp`.
## Outline of proofs:
These results are mostly special cases of more general results for even Hurwitz zeta functions
proved in `Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.HurwitzZetaEven`.
-/
open CharZero Set Filter HurwitzZeta
open Complex hiding exp continuous_exp
open scoped Topology Real
noncomputable section
/-!
## Definition of the completed Riemann zeta
-/
/-- The completed Riemann zeta function with its poles removed, `Λ(s) + 1 / s - 1 / (s - 1)`. -/
def completedRiemannZeta₀ (s : ℂ) : ℂ := completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ 0 s
/-- The completed Riemann zeta function, `Λ(s)`, which satisfies
`Λ(s) = π ^ (-s / 2) Γ(s / 2) ζ(s)` (up to a minor correction at `s = 0`). -/
def completedRiemannZeta (s : ℂ) : ℂ := completedHurwitzZetaEven 0 s
lemma HurwitzZeta.completedHurwitzZetaEven_zero (s : ℂ) :
completedHurwitzZetaEven 0 s = completedRiemannZeta s := rfl
lemma HurwitzZeta.completedHurwitzZetaEven₀_zero (s : ℂ) :
completedHurwitzZetaEven₀ 0 s = completedRiemannZeta₀ s := rfl
lemma HurwitzZeta.completedCosZeta_zero (s : ℂ) :
completedCosZeta 0 s = completedRiemannZeta s := by
rw [completedRiemannZeta, completedHurwitzZetaEven, completedCosZeta, hurwitzEvenFEPair_zero_symm]
lemma HurwitzZeta.completedCosZeta₀_zero (s : ℂ) :
completedCosZeta₀ 0 s = completedRiemannZeta₀ s := by
rw [completedRiemannZeta₀, completedHurwitzZetaEven₀, completedCosZeta₀,
| hurwitzEvenFEPair_zero_symm]
lemma completedRiemannZeta_eq (s : ℂ) :
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LSeries/RiemannZeta.lean | 78 | 80 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.Polish.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.UniformIntegrable
import Mathlib.Probability.Martingale.Upcrossing
/-!
# Martingale convergence theorems
The martingale convergence theorems are a collection of theorems characterizing the convergence
of a martingale provided it satisfies some boundedness conditions. This file contains the
almost everywhere martingale convergence theorem which provides an almost everywhere limit to
an L¹ bounded submartingale. It also contains the L¹ martingale convergence theorem which provides
an L¹ limit to a uniformly integrable submartingale. Finally, it also contains the Lévy upwards
theorems.
## Main results
* `MeasureTheory.Submartingale.ae_tendsto_limitProcess`: the almost everywhere martingale
convergence theorem: an L¹-bounded submartingale adapted to the filtration `ℱ` converges almost
everywhere to its limit process.
* `MeasureTheory.Submartingale.memLp_limitProcess`: the limit process of an Lᵖ-bounded
submartingale is Lᵖ.
* `MeasureTheory.Submartingale.tendsto_eLpNorm_one_limitProcess`: part a of the L¹ martingale
convergence theorem: a uniformly integrable submartingale adapted to the filtration `ℱ` converges
almost everywhere and in L¹ to an integrable function which is measurable with respect to
the σ-algebra `⨆ n, ℱ n`.
* `MeasureTheory.Martingale.ae_eq_condExp_limitProcess`: part b the L¹ martingale convergence
theorem: if `f` is a uniformly integrable martingale adapted to the filtration `ℱ`, then
`f n` equals `𝔼[g | ℱ n]` almost everywhere where `g` is the limiting process of `f`.
* `MeasureTheory.Integrable.tendsto_ae_condExp`: part c the L¹ martingale convergence theorem:
given a `⨆ n, ℱ n`-measurable function `g` where `ℱ` is a filtration, `𝔼[g | ℱ n]` converges
almost everywhere to `g`.
* `MeasureTheory.Integrable.tendsto_eLpNorm_condExp`: part c the L¹ martingale convergence theorem:
given a `⨆ n, ℱ n`-measurable function `g` where `ℱ` is a filtration, `𝔼[g | ℱ n]` converges in
L¹ to `g`.
-/
open TopologicalSpace Filter MeasureTheory.Filtration
open scoped NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {Ω : Type*} {m0 : MeasurableSpace Ω} {μ : Measure Ω} {ℱ : Filtration ℕ m0}
variable {a b : ℝ} {f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ} {ω : Ω} {R : ℝ≥0}
section AeConvergence
/-!
### Almost everywhere martingale convergence theorem
We will now prove the almost everywhere martingale convergence theorem.
The a.e. martingale convergence theorem states: if `f` is an L¹-bounded `ℱ`-submartingale, then
it converges almost everywhere to an integrable function which is measurable with respect to
the σ-algebra `ℱ∞ := ⨆ n, ℱ n`.
Mathematically, we proceed by first noting that a real sequence $(x_n)$ converges if
(a) $\limsup_{n \to \infty} |x_n| < \infty$, (b) for all $a < b \in \mathbb{Q}$ we have the
number of upcrossings of $(x_n)$ from below $a$ to above $b$ is finite.
Thus, for all $\omega$ satisfying $\limsup_{n \to \infty} |f_n(\omega)| < \infty$ and the number of
upcrossings of $(f_n(\omega))$ from below $a$ to above $b$ is finite for all $a < b \in \mathbb{Q}$,
we have $(f_n(\omega))$ is convergent.
Hence, assuming $(f_n)$ is L¹-bounded, using Fatou's lemma, we have
$$
\mathbb{E} \limsup_{n \to \infty} |f_n| \le \limsup_{n \to \infty} \mathbb{E}|f_n| < \infty
$$
implying $\limsup_{n \to \infty} |f_n| < \infty$ a.e. Furthermore, by the upcrossing estimate,
the number of upcrossings is finite almost everywhere implying $f$ converges pointwise almost
everywhere.
Thus, denoting $g$ the a.e. limit of $(f_n)$, $g$ is $\mathcal{F}_\infty$-measurable as for all
$n$, $f_n$ is $\mathcal{F}_n$-measurable and $\mathcal{F}_n \le \mathcal{F}_\infty$. Finally, $g$
is integrable as $|g| \le \liminf_{n \to \infty} |f_n|$ so
$$
\mathbb{E}|g| \le \mathbb{E} \limsup_{n \to \infty} |f_n| \le
\limsup_{n \to \infty} \mathbb{E}|f_n| < \infty
$$
as required.
Implementationwise, we have `tendsto_of_no_upcrossings` which shows that
a bounded sequence converges if it does not visit below $a$ and above $b$ infinitely often
for all $a, b ∈ s$ for some dense set $s$. So, we may skip the first step provided we can prove
that the realizations are bounded almost everywhere. Indeed, suppose $|f_n(\omega)|$ is not
bounded, then either $f_n(\omega) \to \pm \infty$ or one of $\limsup f_n(\omega)$ or
$\liminf f_n(\omega)$ equals $\pm \infty$ while the other is finite. But the first case
contradicts $\liminf |f_n(\omega)| < \infty$ while the second case contradicts finite upcrossings.
Furthermore, we introduce `Filtration.limitProcess` which chooses the limiting random variable
of a stochastic process if it exists, otherwise returning 0. Hence, instead of showing an
existence statement, we phrase the a.e. martingale convergence theorem by showing that a
submartingale converges to its `limitProcess` almost everywhere.
-/
/-- If a stochastic process has bounded upcrossing from below `a` to above `b`,
then it does not frequently visit both below `a` and above `b`. -/
theorem not_frequently_of_upcrossings_lt_top (hab : a < b) (hω : upcrossings a b f ω ≠ ∞) :
¬((∃ᶠ n in atTop, f n ω < a) ∧ ∃ᶠ n in atTop, b < f n ω) := by
rw [← lt_top_iff_ne_top, upcrossings_lt_top_iff] at hω
replace hω : ∃ k, ∀ N, upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω < k := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := hω
exact ⟨k + 1, fun N => lt_of_le_of_lt (hk N) k.lt_succ_self⟩
rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
rw [frequently_atTop] at h₁ h₂
refine Classical.not_not.2 hω ?_
push_neg
intro k
induction' k with k ih
· simp only [zero_le, exists_const]
· obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := ih
obtain ⟨N₁, hN₁, hN₁'⟩ := h₁ N
obtain ⟨N₂, hN₂, hN₂'⟩ := h₂ N₁
exact ⟨N₂ + 1, Nat.succ_le_of_lt <|
lt_of_le_of_lt hN (upcrossingsBefore_lt_of_exists_upcrossing hab hN₁ hN₁' hN₂ hN₂')⟩
/-- A stochastic process that frequently visits below `a` and above `b` has infinite upcrossings. -/
theorem upcrossings_eq_top_of_frequently_lt (hab : a < b) (h₁ : ∃ᶠ n in atTop, f n ω < a)
(h₂ : ∃ᶠ n in atTop, b < f n ω) : upcrossings a b f ω = ∞ :=
by_contradiction fun h => not_frequently_of_upcrossings_lt_top hab h ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
/-- A realization of a stochastic process with bounded upcrossings and bounded liminfs is
convergent.
We use the spelling `< ∞` instead of the standard `≠ ∞` in the assumptions since it is not as easy
to change `<` to `≠` under binders. -/
theorem tendsto_of_uncrossing_lt_top (hf₁ : liminf (fun n => (‖f n ω‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)) atTop < ∞)
(hf₂ : ∀ a b : ℚ, a < b → upcrossings a b f ω < ∞) :
∃ c, Tendsto (fun n => f n ω) atTop (𝓝 c) := by
by_cases h : IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) atTop fun n => |f n ω|
· rw [isBoundedUnder_le_abs] at h
refine tendsto_of_no_upcrossings Rat.denseRange_cast ?_ h.1 h.2
rintro _ ⟨a, rfl⟩ _ ⟨b, rfl⟩ hab
exact not_frequently_of_upcrossings_lt_top hab (hf₂ a b (Rat.cast_lt.1 hab)).ne
· obtain ⟨a, b, hab, h₁, h₂⟩ := ENNReal.exists_upcrossings_of_not_bounded_under hf₁.ne h
exact
False.elim ((hf₂ a b hab).ne (upcrossings_eq_top_of_frequently_lt (Rat.cast_lt.2 hab) h₁ h₂))
/-- An L¹-bounded submartingale has bounded upcrossings almost everywhere. -/
theorem Submartingale.upcrossings_ae_lt_top' [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ)
(hbdd : ∀ n, eLpNorm (f n) 1 μ ≤ R) (hab : a < b) : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, upcrossings a b f ω < ∞ := by
refine ae_lt_top (hf.adapted.measurable_upcrossings hab) ?_
have := hf.mul_lintegral_upcrossings_le_lintegral_pos_part a b
rw [mul_comm, ← ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le] at this
· refine (lt_of_le_of_lt this (ENNReal.div_lt_top ?_ ?_)).ne
· have hR' : ∀ n, ∫⁻ ω, ‖f n ω - a‖₊ ∂μ ≤ R + ‖a‖₊ * μ Set.univ := by
simp_rw [eLpNorm_one_eq_lintegral_enorm] at hbdd
intro n
refine (lintegral_mono ?_ : ∫⁻ ω, ‖f n ω - a‖₊ ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ ω, ‖f n ω‖₊ + ‖a‖₊ ∂μ).trans ?_
· intro ω
simp_rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← nnnorm_neg a, ← ENNReal.coe_add, ENNReal.coe_le_coe]
exact nnnorm_add_le _ _
· simp_rw [lintegral_add_right _ measurable_const, lintegral_const]
exact add_le_add (hbdd _) le_rfl
refine ne_of_lt (iSup_lt_iff.2 ⟨R + ‖a‖₊ * μ Set.univ, ENNReal.add_lt_top.2
⟨ENNReal.coe_lt_top, ENNReal.mul_lt_top ENNReal.coe_lt_top (measure_lt_top _ _)⟩,
fun n => le_trans ?_ (hR' n)⟩)
refine lintegral_mono fun ω => ?_
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_le_iff_le_toReal, ENNReal.coe_toReal, coe_nnnorm]
· by_cases hnonneg : 0 ≤ f n ω - a
· rw [posPart_eq_self.2 hnonneg, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg hnonneg]
· rw [posPart_eq_zero.2 (not_le.1 hnonneg).le]
exact norm_nonneg _
· simp only [Ne, ENNReal.coe_ne_top, not_false_iff]
· simp only [hab, Ne, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero, sub_nonpos, not_le]
· simp only [hab, Ne, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero, sub_nonpos, not_le, true_or]
· simp only [Ne, ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top, not_false_iff, true_or]
theorem Submartingale.upcrossings_ae_lt_top [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ)
(hbdd : ∀ n, eLpNorm (f n) 1 μ ≤ R) : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ∀ a b : ℚ, a < b → upcrossings a b f ω < ∞ := by
simp only [ae_all_iff, eventually_imp_distrib_left]
rintro a b hab
exact hf.upcrossings_ae_lt_top' hbdd (Rat.cast_lt.2 hab)
/-- An L¹-bounded submartingale converges almost everywhere. -/
theorem Submartingale.exists_ae_tendsto_of_bdd [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ)
(hbdd : ∀ n, eLpNorm (f n) 1 μ ≤ R) : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ∃ c, Tendsto (fun n => f n ω) atTop (𝓝 c) := by
filter_upwards [hf.upcrossings_ae_lt_top hbdd, ae_bdd_liminf_atTop_of_eLpNorm_bdd one_ne_zero
(fun n => (hf.stronglyMeasurable n).measurable.mono (ℱ.le n) le_rfl) hbdd] with ω h₁ h₂
exact tendsto_of_uncrossing_lt_top h₂ h₁
theorem Submartingale.exists_ae_trim_tendsto_of_bdd [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ)
(hbdd : ∀ n, eLpNorm (f n) 1 μ ≤ R) :
∀ᵐ ω ∂μ.trim (sSup_le fun _ ⟨_, hn⟩ => hn ▸ ℱ.le _ : ⨆ n, ℱ n ≤ m0),
∃ c, Tendsto (fun n => f n ω) atTop (𝓝 c) := by
letI := (⨆ n, ℱ n)
rw [ae_iff, trim_measurableSet_eq]
· exact hf.exists_ae_tendsto_of_bdd hbdd
· exact MeasurableSet.compl <| measurableSet_exists_tendsto
fun n => (hf.stronglyMeasurable n).measurable.mono (le_sSup ⟨n, rfl⟩) le_rfl
/-- **Almost everywhere martingale convergence theorem**: An L¹-bounded submartingale converges
almost everywhere to a `⨆ n, ℱ n`-measurable function. -/
theorem Submartingale.ae_tendsto_limitProcess [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ)
(hbdd : ∀ n, eLpNorm (f n) 1 μ ≤ R) :
∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => f n ω) atTop (𝓝 (ℱ.limitProcess f μ ω)) := by
classical
suffices
∃ g, StronglyMeasurable[⨆ n, ℱ n] g ∧ ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => f n ω) atTop (𝓝 (g ω)) by
rw [limitProcess, dif_pos this]
exact (Classical.choose_spec this).2
set g' : Ω → ℝ := fun ω => if h : ∃ c, Tendsto (fun n => f n ω) atTop (𝓝 c) then h.choose else 0
have hle : ⨆ n, ℱ n ≤ m0 := sSup_le fun m ⟨n, hn⟩ => hn ▸ ℱ.le _
| have hg' : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ.trim hle, Tendsto (fun n => f n ω) atTop (𝓝 (g' ω)) := by
filter_upwards [hf.exists_ae_trim_tendsto_of_bdd hbdd] with ω hω
simp_rw [g', dif_pos hω]
exact hω.choose_spec
have hg'm : AEStronglyMeasurable[⨆ n, ℱ n] g' (μ.trim hle) :=
(@aemeasurable_of_tendsto_metrizable_ae' _ _ (⨆ n, ℱ n) _ _ _ _ _ _ _
(fun n => ((hf.stronglyMeasurable n).measurable.mono (le_sSup ⟨n, rfl⟩ : ℱ n ≤ ⨆ n, ℱ n)
le_rfl).aemeasurable) hg').aestronglyMeasurable
obtain ⟨g, hgm, hae⟩ := hg'm
have hg : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ.trim hle, Tendsto (fun n => f n ω) atTop (𝓝 (g ω)) := by
filter_upwards [hae, hg'] with ω hω hg'ω
exact hω ▸ hg'ω
exact ⟨g, hgm, measure_eq_zero_of_trim_eq_zero hle hg⟩
/-- The limiting process of an Lᵖ-bounded submartingale is Lᵖ. -/
theorem Submartingale.memLp_limitProcess {p : ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ)
(hbdd : ∀ n, eLpNorm (f n) p μ ≤ R) : MemLp (ℱ.limitProcess f μ) p μ :=
memLp_limitProcess_of_eLpNorm_bdd
(fun n => ((hf.stronglyMeasurable n).mono (ℱ.le n)).aestronglyMeasurable) hbdd
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias Submartingale.memℒp_limitProcess := Submartingale.memLp_limitProcess
| Mathlib/Probability/Martingale/Convergence.lean | 214 | 236 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.IsManifold.ExtChartAt
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.LocalInvariantProperties
/-!
# `C^n` functions between manifolds
We define `Cⁿ` functions between manifolds, as functions which are `Cⁿ` in charts, and prove
basic properties of these notions. Here, `n` can be finite, or `∞`, or `ω`.
## Main definitions and statements
Let `M` and `M'` be two manifolds, with respect to models with corners `I` and `I'`. Let
`f : M → M'`.
* `ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x` states that the function `f` is `Cⁿ` within the set `s`
around the point `x`.
* `ContMDiffAt I I' n f x` states that the function `f` is `Cⁿ` around `x`.
* `ContMDiffOn I I' n f s` states that the function `f` is `Cⁿ` on the set `s`
* `ContMDiff I I' n f` states that the function `f` is `Cⁿ`.
We also give some basic properties of `Cⁿ` functions between manifolds, following the API of
`C^n` functions between vector spaces.
See `Basic.lean` for further basic properties of `Cⁿ` functions between manifolds,
`NormedSpace.lean` for the equivalence of manifold-smoothness to usual smoothness,
`Product.lean` for smoothness results related to the product of manifolds and
`Atlas.lean` for smoothness of atlas members and local structomorphisms.
## Implementation details
Many properties follow for free from the corresponding properties of functions in vector spaces,
as being `Cⁿ` is a local property invariant under the `Cⁿ` groupoid. We take advantage of the
general machinery developed in `LocalInvariantProperties.lean` to get these properties
automatically. For instance, the fact that being `Cⁿ` does not depend on the chart one considers
is given by `liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart`.
For this to work, the definition of `ContMDiffWithinAt` and friends has to
follow definitionally the setup of local invariant properties. Still, we recast the definition
in terms of extended charts in `contMDiffOn_iff` and `contMDiff_iff`.
-/
open Set Function Filter ChartedSpace IsManifold
open scoped Topology Manifold ContDiff
/-! ### Definition of `Cⁿ` functions between manifolds -/
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
-- Prerequisite typeclasses to say that `M` is a manifold over the pair `(E, H)`
{E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
{I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H} {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
-- Prerequisite typeclasses to say that `M'` is a manifold over the pair `(E', H')`
{E' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H']
{I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'} {M' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M'] [ChartedSpace H' M']
-- Prerequisite typeclasses to say that `M''` is a manifold over the pair `(E'', H'')`
{E'' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E''] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E''] {H'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H'']
{I'' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E'' H''} {M'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M''] [ChartedSpace H'' M'']
-- declare functions, sets, points and smoothness indices
{e : PartialHomeomorph M H}
{e' : PartialHomeomorph M' H'} {f f₁ : M → M'} {s s₁ t : Set M} {x : M} {m n : WithTop ℕ∞}
variable (I I') in
/-- Property in the model space of a model with corners of being `C^n` within at set at a point,
when read in the model vector space. This property will be lifted to manifolds to define `C^n`
functions between manifolds. -/
def ContDiffWithinAtProp (n : WithTop ℕ∞) (f : H → H') (s : Set H) (x : H) : Prop :=
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (I' ∘ f ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (I x)
theorem contDiffWithinAtProp_self_source {f : E → H'} {s : Set E} {x : E} :
ContDiffWithinAtProp 𝓘(𝕜, E) I' n f s x ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (I' ∘ f) s x := by
simp_rw [ContDiffWithinAtProp, modelWithCornersSelf_coe, range_id, inter_univ,
modelWithCornersSelf_coe_symm, CompTriple.comp_eq, preimage_id_eq, id_eq]
theorem contDiffWithinAtProp_self {f : E → E'} {s : Set E} {x : E} :
ContDiffWithinAtProp 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') n f s x ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x :=
contDiffWithinAtProp_self_source
theorem contDiffWithinAtProp_self_target {f : H → E'} {s : Set H} {x : H} :
ContDiffWithinAtProp I 𝓘(𝕜, E') n f s x ↔
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (f ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (I x) :=
Iff.rfl
/-- Being `Cⁿ` in the model space is a local property, invariant under `Cⁿ` maps. Therefore,
it lifts nicely to manifolds. -/
theorem contDiffWithinAt_localInvariantProp_of_le (n m : WithTop ℕ∞) (hmn : m ≤ n) :
(contDiffGroupoid n I).LocalInvariantProp (contDiffGroupoid n I')
(ContDiffWithinAtProp I I' m) where
is_local {s x u f} u_open xu := by
have : I.symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ u) ∩ range I = I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I ∩ I.symm ⁻¹' u := by
simp only [inter_right_comm, preimage_inter]
rw [ContDiffWithinAtProp, ContDiffWithinAtProp, this]
symm
apply contDiffWithinAt_inter
have : u ∈ 𝓝 (I.symm (I x)) := by
rw [ModelWithCorners.left_inv]
exact u_open.mem_nhds xu
apply ContinuousAt.preimage_mem_nhds I.continuous_symm.continuousAt this
right_invariance' {s x f e} he hx h := by
rw [ContDiffWithinAtProp] at h ⊢
have : I x = (I ∘ e.symm ∘ I.symm) (I (e x)) := by simp only [hx, mfld_simps]
rw [this] at h
have : I (e x) ∈ I.symm ⁻¹' e.target ∩ range I := by simp only [hx, mfld_simps]
have := (mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid.2 he).2.contDiffWithinAt this
convert (h.comp_inter _ (this.of_le hmn)).mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin _
using 1
· ext y; simp only [mfld_simps]
refine mem_nhdsWithin.mpr
⟨I.symm ⁻¹' e.target, e.open_target.preimage I.continuous_symm, by
simp_rw [mem_preimage, I.left_inv, e.mapsTo hx], ?_⟩
mfld_set_tac
congr_of_forall {s x f g} h hx hf := by
apply hf.congr
· intro y hy
simp only [mfld_simps] at hy
simp only [h, hy, mfld_simps]
· simp only [hx, mfld_simps]
left_invariance' {s x f e'} he' hs hx h := by
rw [ContDiffWithinAtProp] at h ⊢
have A : (I' ∘ f ∘ I.symm) (I x) ∈ I'.symm ⁻¹' e'.source ∩ range I' := by
simp only [hx, mfld_simps]
have := (mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid.2 he').1.contDiffWithinAt A
convert (this.of_le hmn).comp _ h _
· ext y; simp only [mfld_simps]
· intro y hy; simp only [mfld_simps] at hy; simpa only [hy, mfld_simps] using hs hy.1
/-- Being `Cⁿ` in the model space is a local property, invariant under `C^n` maps. Therefore,
it lifts nicely to manifolds. -/
theorem contDiffWithinAt_localInvariantProp (n : WithTop ℕ∞) :
(contDiffGroupoid n I).LocalInvariantProp (contDiffGroupoid n I')
(ContDiffWithinAtProp I I' n) :=
contDiffWithinAt_localInvariantProp_of_le n n le_rfl
theorem contDiffWithinAtProp_mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
(n : WithTop ℕ∞) ⦃s x t⦄ ⦃f : H → H'⦄ (hts : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x)
(h : ContDiffWithinAtProp I I' n f s x) : ContDiffWithinAtProp I I' n f t x := by
refine h.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin ?_
refine inter_mem ?_ (mem_of_superset self_mem_nhdsWithin inter_subset_right)
rwa [← Filter.mem_map, ← I.image_eq, I.symm_map_nhdsWithin_image]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")]
alias contDiffWithinAtProp_mono_of_mem := contDiffWithinAtProp_mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem contDiffWithinAtProp_id (x : H) : ContDiffWithinAtProp I I n id univ x := by
simp only [ContDiffWithinAtProp, id_comp, preimage_univ, univ_inter]
have : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n id (range I) (I x) := contDiff_id.contDiffAt.contDiffWithinAt
refine this.congr (fun y hy => ?_) ?_
· simp only [ModelWithCorners.right_inv I hy, mfld_simps]
· simp only [mfld_simps]
variable (I I') in
/-- A function is `n` times continuously differentiable within a set at a point in a manifold if
it is continuous and it is `n` times continuously differentiable in this set around this point, when
read in the preferred chart at this point. -/
def ContMDiffWithinAt (n : WithTop ℕ∞) (f : M → M') (s : Set M) (x : M) :=
LiftPropWithinAt (ContDiffWithinAtProp I I' n) f s x
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")] alias SmoothWithinAt := ContMDiffWithinAt
variable (I I') in
/-- A function is `n` times continuously differentiable at a point in a manifold if
it is continuous and it is `n` times continuously differentiable around this point, when
read in the preferred chart at this point. -/
def ContMDiffAt (n : WithTop ℕ∞) (f : M → M') (x : M) :=
ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f univ x
theorem contMDiffAt_iff {n : WithTop ℕ∞} {f : M → M'} {x : M} :
ContMDiffAt I I' n f x ↔
ContinuousAt f x ∧
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm) (range I)
(extChartAt I x x) :=
liftPropAt_iff.trans <| by rw [ContDiffWithinAtProp, preimage_univ, univ_inter]; rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")] alias SmoothAt := ContMDiffAt
variable (I I') in
/-- A function is `n` times continuously differentiable in a set of a manifold if it is continuous
and, for any pair of points, it is `n` times continuously differentiable on this set in the charts
around these points. -/
def ContMDiffOn (n : WithTop ℕ∞) (f : M → M') (s : Set M) :=
∀ x ∈ s, ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")] alias SmoothOn := ContMDiffOn
variable (I I') in
/-- A function is `n` times continuously differentiable in a manifold if it is continuous
and, for any pair of points, it is `n` times continuously differentiable in the charts
around these points. -/
def ContMDiff (n : WithTop ℕ∞) (f : M → M') :=
∀ x, ContMDiffAt I I' n f x
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-21")] alias Smooth := ContMDiff
/-! ### Deducing smoothness from higher smoothness -/
theorem ContMDiffWithinAt.of_le (hf : ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x) (le : m ≤ n) :
ContMDiffWithinAt I I' m f s x := by
simp only [ContMDiffWithinAt, LiftPropWithinAt] at hf ⊢
exact ⟨hf.1, hf.2.of_le (mod_cast le)⟩
theorem ContMDiffAt.of_le (hf : ContMDiffAt I I' n f x) (le : m ≤ n) : ContMDiffAt I I' m f x :=
ContMDiffWithinAt.of_le hf le
theorem ContMDiffOn.of_le (hf : ContMDiffOn I I' n f s) (le : m ≤ n) : ContMDiffOn I I' m f s :=
fun x hx => (hf x hx).of_le le
theorem ContMDiff.of_le (hf : ContMDiff I I' n f) (le : m ≤ n) : ContMDiff I I' m f := fun x =>
(hf x).of_le le
/-! ### Basic properties of `C^n` functions between manifolds -/
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")] alias ContMDiff.smooth := ContMDiff.of_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")] alias Smooth.contMDiff := ContMDiff.of_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")] alias ContMDiffOn.smoothOn := ContMDiffOn.of_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")] alias SmoothOn.contMDiffOn := ContMDiffOn.of_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")] alias ContMDiffAt.smoothAt := ContMDiffAt.of_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")] alias SmoothAt.contMDiffAt := ContMDiffOn.of_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")]
alias ContMDiffWithinAt.smoothWithinAt := ContMDiffWithinAt.of_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")]
alias SmoothWithinAt.contMDiffWithinAt := ContMDiffWithinAt.of_le
theorem ContMDiff.contMDiffAt (h : ContMDiff I I' n f) : ContMDiffAt I I' n f x :=
h x
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")] alias Smooth.smoothAt := ContMDiff.contMDiffAt
theorem contMDiffWithinAt_univ : ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f univ x ↔ ContMDiffAt I I' n f x :=
Iff.rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")] alias smoothWithinAt_univ := contMDiffWithinAt_univ
theorem contMDiffOn_univ : ContMDiffOn I I' n f univ ↔ ContMDiff I I' n f := by
simp only [ContMDiffOn, ContMDiff, contMDiffWithinAt_univ, forall_prop_of_true, mem_univ]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")] alias smoothOn_univ := contMDiffOn_univ
/-- One can reformulate being `C^n` within a set at a point as continuity within this set at this
point, and being `C^n` in the corresponding extended chart. -/
theorem contMDiffWithinAt_iff :
ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (extChartAt I x x) := by
simp_rw [ContMDiffWithinAt, liftPropWithinAt_iff']; rfl
/-- One can reformulate being `Cⁿ` within a set at a point as continuity within this set at this
point, and being `Cⁿ` in the corresponding extended chart. This form states regularity of `f`
written in such a way that the set is restricted to lie within the domain/codomain of the
corresponding charts.
Even though this expression is more complicated than the one in `contMDiffWithinAt_iff`, it is
a smaller set, but their germs at `extChartAt I x x` are equal. It is sometimes useful to rewrite
using this in the goal.
-/
theorem contMDiffWithinAt_iff' :
ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).target ∩
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' (f x)).source))
(extChartAt I x x) := by
simp only [ContMDiffWithinAt, liftPropWithinAt_iff']
exact and_congr_right fun hc => contDiffWithinAt_congr_set <|
hc.extChartAt_symm_preimage_inter_range_eventuallyEq
/-- One can reformulate being `Cⁿ` within a set at a point as continuity within this set at this
point, and being `Cⁿ` in the corresponding extended chart in the target. -/
theorem contMDiffWithinAt_iff_target :
ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧ ContMDiffWithinAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') n (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f) s x := by
simp_rw [ContMDiffWithinAt, liftPropWithinAt_iff', ← and_assoc]
have cont :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧ ContinuousWithinAt (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f) s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
and_iff_left_of_imp <| (continuousAt_extChartAt _).comp_continuousWithinAt
simp_rw [cont, ContDiffWithinAtProp, extChartAt, PartialHomeomorph.extend, PartialEquiv.coe_trans,
ModelWithCorners.toPartialEquiv_coe, PartialHomeomorph.coe_coe, modelWithCornersSelf_coe,
chartAt_self_eq, PartialHomeomorph.refl_apply, id_comp]
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")] alias smoothWithinAt_iff := contMDiffWithinAt_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")]
alias smoothWithinAt_iff_target := contMDiffWithinAt_iff_target
theorem contMDiffAt_iff_target {x : M} :
ContMDiffAt I I' n f x ↔
ContinuousAt f x ∧ ContMDiffAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') n (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f) x := by
rw [ContMDiffAt, ContMDiffAt, contMDiffWithinAt_iff_target, continuousWithinAt_univ]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")] alias smoothAt_iff_target := contMDiffAt_iff_target
/-- One can reformulate being `Cⁿ` within a set at a point as being `Cⁿ` in the source space when
composing with the extended chart. -/
theorem contMDiffWithinAt_iff_source :
ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x ↔
ContMDiffWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) I' n (f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (extChartAt I x x) := by
simp_rw [ContMDiffWithinAt, liftPropWithinAt_iff']
have : ContinuousWithinAt f s x
↔ ContinuousWithinAt (f ∘ ↑(extChartAt I x).symm) (↑(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range ↑I)
(extChartAt I x x) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· apply h.comp_of_eq
· exact (continuousAt_extChartAt_symm x).continuousWithinAt
· exact (mapsTo_preimage _ _).mono_left inter_subset_left
· exact extChartAt_to_inv x
· rw [← continuousWithinAt_inter (extChartAt_source_mem_nhds (I := I) x)]
have : ContinuousWithinAt ((f ∘ ↑(extChartAt I x).symm) ∘ ↑(extChartAt I x))
(s ∩ (extChartAt I x).source) x := by
apply h.comp (continuousAt_extChartAt x).continuousWithinAt
intro y hy
have : (chartAt H x).symm ((chartAt H x) y) = y :=
PartialHomeomorph.left_inv _ (by simpa using hy.2)
simpa [this] using hy.1
apply this.congr
· intro y hy
have : (chartAt H x).symm ((chartAt H x) y) = y :=
PartialHomeomorph.left_inv _ (by simpa using hy.2)
simp [this]
· simp
rw [← this]
simp only [ContDiffWithinAtProp, mfld_simps, preimage_comp, comp_assoc]
/-- One can reformulate being `Cⁿ` at a point as being `Cⁿ` in the source space when
composing with the extended chart. -/
theorem contMDiffAt_iff_source :
ContMDiffAt I I' n f x ↔
ContMDiffWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) I' n (f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm) (range I) (extChartAt I x x) := by
rw [← contMDiffWithinAt_univ, contMDiffWithinAt_iff_source]
simp
section IsManifold
theorem contMDiffWithinAt_iff_source_of_mem_maximalAtlas
[IsManifold I n M] (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I n M) (hx : x ∈ e.source) :
ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x ↔
ContMDiffWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) I' n (f ∘ (e.extend I).symm) ((e.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I)
(e.extend I x) := by
have h2x := hx; rw [← e.extend_source (I := I)] at h2x
simp_rw [ContMDiffWithinAt,
(contDiffWithinAt_localInvariantProp n).liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart_source he hx,
StructureGroupoid.liftPropWithinAt_self_source,
e.extend_symm_continuousWithinAt_comp_right_iff, contDiffWithinAtProp_self_source,
ContDiffWithinAtProp, Function.comp, e.left_inv hx, (e.extend I).left_inv h2x]
rfl
theorem contMDiffWithinAt_iff_source_of_mem_source
[IsManifold I n M] {x' : M} (hx' : x' ∈ (chartAt H x).source) :
ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x' ↔
ContMDiffWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) I' n (f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (extChartAt I x x') :=
contMDiffWithinAt_iff_source_of_mem_maximalAtlas (chart_mem_maximalAtlas x) hx'
theorem contMDiffAt_iff_source_of_mem_source
[IsManifold I n M] {x' : M} (hx' : x' ∈ (chartAt H x).source) :
ContMDiffAt I I' n f x' ↔
ContMDiffWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) I' n (f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm) (range I) (extChartAt I x x') := by
simp_rw [ContMDiffAt, contMDiffWithinAt_iff_source_of_mem_source hx', preimage_univ, univ_inter]
theorem contMDiffWithinAt_iff_target_of_mem_source
[IsManifold I' n M'] {x : M} {y : M'} (hy : f x ∈ (chartAt H' y).source) :
ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧ ContMDiffWithinAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') n (extChartAt I' y ∘ f) s x := by
simp_rw [ContMDiffWithinAt]
rw [(contDiffWithinAt_localInvariantProp n).liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart_target
(chart_mem_maximalAtlas y) hy,
and_congr_right]
intro hf
simp_rw [StructureGroupoid.liftPropWithinAt_self_target]
simp_rw [((chartAt H' y).continuousAt hy).comp_continuousWithinAt hf]
rw [← extChartAt_source (I := I')] at hy
simp_rw [(continuousAt_extChartAt' hy).comp_continuousWithinAt hf]
rfl
theorem contMDiffAt_iff_target_of_mem_source
[IsManifold I' n M'] {x : M} {y : M'} (hy : f x ∈ (chartAt H' y).source) :
ContMDiffAt I I' n f x ↔
ContinuousAt f x ∧ ContMDiffAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') n (extChartAt I' y ∘ f) x := by
rw [ContMDiffAt, contMDiffWithinAt_iff_target_of_mem_source hy, continuousWithinAt_univ,
ContMDiffAt]
variable [IsManifold I n M] [IsManifold I' n M']
theorem contMDiffWithinAt_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas {x : M} (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I n M)
(he' : e' ∈ maximalAtlas I' n M') (hx : x ∈ e.source) (hy : f x ∈ e'.source) :
ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (e'.extend I' ∘ f ∘ (e.extend I).symm)
((e.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (e.extend I x) :=
(contDiffWithinAt_localInvariantProp n).liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart he hx he' hy
/-- An alternative formulation of `contMDiffWithinAt_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas`
if the set if `s` lies in `e.source`. -/
theorem contMDiffWithinAt_iff_image {x : M} (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I n M)
(he' : e' ∈ maximalAtlas I' n M')
(hs : s ⊆ e.source) (hx : x ∈ e.source) (hy : f x ∈ e'.source) :
ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (e'.extend I' ∘ f ∘ (e.extend I).symm) (e.extend I '' s)
(e.extend I x) := by
rw [contMDiffWithinAt_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas he he' hx hy, and_congr_right_iff]
refine fun _ => contDiffWithinAt_congr_set ?_
simp_rw [e.extend_symm_preimage_inter_range_eventuallyEq hs hx]
| /-- One can reformulate being `C^n` within a set at a point as continuity within this set at this
point, and being `C^n` in any chart containing that point. -/
theorem contMDiffWithinAt_iff_of_mem_source {x' : M} {y : M'} (hx : x' ∈ (chartAt H x).source)
(hy : f x' ∈ (chartAt H' y).source) :
ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x' ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x' ∧
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (extChartAt I x x') :=
contMDiffWithinAt_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas (chart_mem_maximalAtlas x)
(chart_mem_maximalAtlas y) hx hy
theorem contMDiffWithinAt_iff_of_mem_source' {x' : M} {y : M'} (hx : x' ∈ (chartAt H x).source)
(hy : f x' ∈ (chartAt H' y).source) :
ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x' ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x' ∧
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/ContMDiff/Defs.lean | 422 | 437 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Field
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Chebyshev
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real
import Mathlib.Order.Partition.Equipartition
/-!
# Numerical bounds for Szemerédi Regularity Lemma
This file gathers the numerical facts required by the proof of Szemerédi's regularity lemma.
This entire file is internal to the proof of Szemerédi Regularity Lemma.
## Main declarations
* `SzemerediRegularity.stepBound`: During the inductive step, a partition of size `n` is blown to
size at most `stepBound n`.
* `SzemerediRegularity.initialBound`: The size of the partition we start the induction with.
* `SzemerediRegularity.bound`: The upper bound on the size of the partition produced by our version
of Szemerédi's regularity lemma.
## References
[Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta, *Formalising Szemerédi’s Regularity Lemma in Lean*][srl_itp]
-/
open Finset Fintype Function Real
namespace SzemerediRegularity
/-- Auxiliary function for Szemerédi's regularity lemma. Blowing up a partition of size `n` during
the induction results in a partition of size at most `stepBound n`. -/
def stepBound (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
n * 4 ^ n
theorem le_stepBound : id ≤ stepBound := fun n =>
Nat.le_mul_of_pos_right _ <| pow_pos (by norm_num) n
theorem stepBound_mono : Monotone stepBound := fun _ _ h =>
Nat.mul_le_mul h <| Nat.pow_le_pow_right (by norm_num) h
theorem stepBound_pos_iff {n : ℕ} : 0 < stepBound n ↔ 0 < n :=
mul_pos_iff_of_pos_right <| by positivity
alias ⟨_, stepBound_pos⟩ := stepBound_pos_iff
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_stepBound {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (n : ℕ) :
(stepBound n : α) = n * 4 ^ n := by unfold stepBound; norm_cast
end SzemerediRegularity
open SzemerediRegularity
variable {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] {P : Finpartition (univ : Finset α)}
{u : Finset α} {ε : ℝ}
local notation3 "m" => (card α / stepBound #P.parts : ℕ)
local notation3 "a" => (card α / #P.parts - m * 4 ^ #P.parts : ℕ)
namespace SzemerediRegularity.Positivity
private theorem eps_pos {ε : ℝ} {n : ℕ} (h : 100 ≤ (4 : ℝ) ^ n * ε ^ 5) : 0 < ε :=
(Odd.pow_pos_iff (by decide)).mp
(pos_of_mul_pos_right ((show 0 < (100 : ℝ) by norm_num).trans_le h) (by positivity))
private theorem m_pos [Nonempty α] (hPα : #P.parts * 16 ^ #P.parts ≤ card α) : 0 < m :=
Nat.div_pos (hPα.trans' <| by unfold stepBound; gcongr; norm_num) <|
stepBound_pos (P.parts_nonempty <| univ_nonempty.ne_empty).card_pos
/-- Local extension for the `positivity` tactic: A few facts that are needed many times for the
proof of Szemerédi's regularity lemma. -/
scoped macro "sz_positivity" : tactic =>
`(tactic|
{ try have := m_pos ‹_›
try have := eps_pos ‹_›
positivity })
-- Original meta code
/- meta def positivity_szemeredi_regularity : expr → tactic strictness
| `(%%n / step_bound (finpartition.parts %%P).card) := do
p ← to_expr
``((finpartition.parts %%P).card * 16^(finpartition.parts %%P).card ≤ %%n)
>>= find_assumption,
positive <$> mk_app ``m_pos [p]
| ε := do
typ ← infer_type ε,
unify typ `(ℝ),
p ← to_expr ``(100 ≤ 4 ^ _ * %%ε ^ 5) >>= find_assumption,
positive <$> mk_app ``eps_pos [p] -/
end SzemerediRegularity.Positivity
namespace SzemerediRegularity
open scoped SzemerediRegularity.Positivity
theorem m_pos [Nonempty α] (hPα : #P.parts * 16 ^ #P.parts ≤ card α) : 0 < m := by
sz_positivity
theorem coe_m_add_one_pos : 0 < (m : ℝ) + 1 := by positivity
theorem one_le_m_coe [Nonempty α] (hPα : #P.parts * 16 ^ #P.parts ≤ card α) : (1 : ℝ) ≤ m :=
Nat.one_le_cast.2 <| m_pos hPα
theorem eps_pow_five_pos (hPε : 100 ≤ (4 : ℝ) ^ #P.parts * ε ^ 5) : ↑0 < ε ^ 5 :=
pos_of_mul_pos_right ((by norm_num : (0 : ℝ) < 100).trans_le hPε) <| pow_nonneg (by norm_num) _
theorem eps_pos (hPε : 100 ≤ (4 : ℝ) ^ #P.parts * ε ^ 5) : 0 < ε :=
(Odd.pow_pos_iff (by decide)).mp (eps_pow_five_pos hPε)
theorem hundred_div_ε_pow_five_le_m [Nonempty α] (hPα : #P.parts * 16 ^ #P.parts ≤ card α)
(hPε : 100 ≤ (4 : ℝ) ^ #P.parts * ε ^ 5) : 100 / ε ^ 5 ≤ m :=
(div_le_of_le_mul₀ (eps_pow_five_pos hPε).le (by positivity) hPε).trans <| by
norm_cast
rwa [Nat.le_div_iff_mul_le (stepBound_pos (P.parts_nonempty <|
univ_nonempty.ne_empty).card_pos), stepBound, mul_left_comm, ← mul_pow]
theorem hundred_le_m [Nonempty α] (hPα : #P.parts * 16 ^ #P.parts ≤ card α)
(hPε : 100 ≤ (4 : ℝ) ^ #P.parts * ε ^ 5) (hε : ε ≤ 1) : 100 ≤ m :=
| mod_cast
(hundred_div_ε_pow_five_le_m hPα hPε).trans'
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Regularity/Bound.lean | 126 | 127 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Keeley Hoek
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.NeZero
import Mathlib.Data.Int.DivMod
import Mathlib.Logic.Embedding.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
import Mathlib.Tactic.Attr.Register
/-!
# The finite type with `n` elements
`Fin n` is the type whose elements are natural numbers smaller than `n`.
This file expands on the development in the core library.
## Main definitions
### Induction principles
* `finZeroElim` : Elimination principle for the empty set `Fin 0`, generalizes `Fin.elim0`.
Further definitions and eliminators can be found in `Init.Data.Fin.Lemmas`
### Embeddings and isomorphisms
* `Fin.valEmbedding` : coercion to natural numbers as an `Embedding`;
* `Fin.succEmb` : `Fin.succ` as an `Embedding`;
* `Fin.castLEEmb h` : `Fin.castLE` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin m`, `h : n ≤ m`;
* `finCongr` : `Fin.cast` as an `Equiv`, equivalence between `Fin n` and `Fin m` when `n = m`;
* `Fin.castAddEmb m` : `Fin.castAdd` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n+m)`;
* `Fin.castSuccEmb` : `Fin.castSucc` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n+1)`;
* `Fin.addNatEmb m i` : `Fin.addNat` as an `Embedding`, add `m` on `i` on the right,
generalizes `Fin.succ`;
* `Fin.natAddEmb n i` : `Fin.natAdd` as an `Embedding`, adds `n` on `i` on the left;
### Other casts
* `Fin.divNat i` : divides `i : Fin (m * n)` by `n`;
* `Fin.modNat i` : takes the mod of `i : Fin (m * n)` by `n`;
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid Finset
open Fin Nat Function
attribute [simp] Fin.succ_ne_zero Fin.castSucc_lt_last
/-- Elimination principle for the empty set `Fin 0`, dependent version. -/
def finZeroElim {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} (x : Fin 0) : α x :=
x.elim0
namespace Fin
@[simp] theorem mk_eq_one {n a : Nat} {ha : a < n + 2} :
(⟨a, ha⟩ : Fin (n + 2)) = 1 ↔ a = 1 :=
mk.inj_iff
@[simp] theorem one_eq_mk {n a : Nat} {ha : a < n + 2} :
1 = (⟨a, ha⟩ : Fin (n + 2)) ↔ a = 1 := by
simp [eq_comm]
instance {n : ℕ} : CanLift ℕ (Fin n) Fin.val (· < n) where
prf k hk := ⟨⟨k, hk⟩, rfl⟩
/-- A dependent variant of `Fin.elim0`. -/
def rec0 {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} (i : Fin 0) : α i := absurd i.2 (Nat.not_lt_zero _)
variable {n m : ℕ}
--variable {a b : Fin n} -- this *really* breaks stuff
theorem val_injective : Function.Injective (@Fin.val n) :=
@Fin.eq_of_val_eq n
/-- If you actually have an element of `Fin n`, then the `n` is always positive -/
lemma size_positive : Fin n → 0 < n := Fin.pos
lemma size_positive' [Nonempty (Fin n)] : 0 < n :=
‹Nonempty (Fin n)›.elim Fin.pos
protected theorem prop (a : Fin n) : a.val < n :=
a.2
lemma lt_last_iff_ne_last {a : Fin (n + 1)} : a < last n ↔ a ≠ last n := by
simp [Fin.lt_iff_le_and_ne, le_last]
lemma ne_zero_of_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (hab : a < b) : b ≠ 0 :=
Fin.ne_of_gt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt a.zero_le hab
lemma ne_last_of_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (hab : a < b) : a ≠ last n :=
Fin.ne_of_lt <| Fin.lt_of_lt_of_le hab b.le_last
/-- Equivalence between `Fin n` and `{ i // i < n }`. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def equivSubtype : Fin n ≃ { i // i < n } where
toFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2⟩
invFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
right_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
section coe
/-!
### coercions and constructions
-/
theorem val_eq_val (a b : Fin n) : (a : ℕ) = b ↔ a = b :=
Fin.ext_iff.symm
theorem ne_iff_vne (a b : Fin n) : a ≠ b ↔ a.1 ≠ b.1 :=
Fin.ext_iff.not
theorem mk_eq_mk {a h a' h'} : @mk n a h = @mk n a' h' ↔ a = a' :=
Fin.ext_iff
-- syntactic tautologies now
/-- Assume `k = l`. If two functions defined on `Fin k` and `Fin l` are equal on each element,
then they coincide (in the heq sense). -/
protected theorem heq_fun_iff {α : Sort*} {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) {f : Fin k → α} {g : Fin l → α} :
HEq f g ↔ ∀ i : Fin k, f i = g ⟨(i : ℕ), h ▸ i.2⟩ := by
subst h
simp [funext_iff]
/-- Assume `k = l` and `k' = l'`.
If two functions `Fin k → Fin k' → α` and `Fin l → Fin l' → α` are equal on each pair,
then they coincide (in the heq sense). -/
protected theorem heq_fun₂_iff {α : Sort*} {k l k' l' : ℕ} (h : k = l) (h' : k' = l')
{f : Fin k → Fin k' → α} {g : Fin l → Fin l' → α} :
HEq f g ↔ ∀ (i : Fin k) (j : Fin k'), f i j = g ⟨(i : ℕ), h ▸ i.2⟩ ⟨(j : ℕ), h' ▸ j.2⟩ := by
subst h
subst h'
simp [funext_iff]
/-- Two elements of `Fin k` and `Fin l` are heq iff their values in `ℕ` coincide. This requires
`k = l`. For the left implication without this assumption, see `val_eq_val_of_heq`. -/
protected theorem heq_ext_iff {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) {i : Fin k} {j : Fin l} :
HEq i j ↔ (i : ℕ) = (j : ℕ) := by
subst h
simp [val_eq_val]
end coe
section Order
/-!
### order
-/
theorem le_iff_val_le_val {a b : Fin n} : a ≤ b ↔ (a : ℕ) ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
/-- `a < b` as natural numbers if and only if `a < b` in `Fin n`. -/
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem val_fin_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin n} : (a : ℕ) < (b : ℕ) ↔ a < b :=
Iff.rfl
/-- `a ≤ b` as natural numbers if and only if `a ≤ b` in `Fin n`. -/
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem val_fin_le {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin n} : (a : ℕ) ≤ (b : ℕ) ↔ a ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
theorem min_val {a : Fin n} : min (a : ℕ) n = a := by simp
theorem max_val {a : Fin n} : max (a : ℕ) n = n := by simp
/-- The inclusion map `Fin n → ℕ` is an embedding. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied apply]
def valEmbedding : Fin n ↪ ℕ :=
⟨val, val_injective⟩
@[simp]
theorem equivSubtype_symm_trans_valEmbedding :
equivSubtype.symm.toEmbedding.trans valEmbedding = Embedding.subtype (· < n) :=
rfl
/-- Use the ordering on `Fin n` for checking recursive definitions.
For example, the following definition is not accepted by the termination checker,
unless we declare the `WellFoundedRelation` instance:
```lean
def factorial {n : ℕ} : Fin n → ℕ
| ⟨0, _⟩ := 1
| ⟨i + 1, hi⟩ := (i + 1) * factorial ⟨i, i.lt_succ_self.trans hi⟩
```
-/
instance {n : ℕ} : WellFoundedRelation (Fin n) :=
measure (val : Fin n → ℕ)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-24")]
alias val_zero' := val_zero
/-- `Fin.mk_zero` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n + 1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem mk_zero' (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (⟨0, pos_of_neZero n⟩ : Fin n) = 0 := rfl
/--
The `Fin.zero_le` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
protected theorem zero_le' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : 0 ≤ a :=
Nat.zero_le a.val
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem val_eq_zero_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin n} : a.val = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [Fin.ext_iff, val_zero]
theorem val_ne_zero_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin n} : a.val ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
val_eq_zero_iff.not
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem val_pos_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin n} : 0 < a.val ↔ 0 < a := by
rw [← val_fin_lt, val_zero]
/--
The `Fin.pos_iff_ne_zero` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
theorem pos_iff_ne_zero' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : 0 < a ↔ a ≠ 0 := by
rw [← val_pos_iff, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero, val_ne_zero_iff]
@[simp] lemma cast_eq_self (a : Fin n) : a.cast rfl = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem cast_eq_zero {k l : ℕ} [NeZero k] [NeZero l]
(h : k = l) (x : Fin k) : Fin.cast h x = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
simp [← val_eq_zero_iff]
lemma cast_injective {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) : Injective (Fin.cast h) :=
fun a b hab ↦ by simpa [← val_eq_val] using hab
theorem last_pos' [NeZero n] : 0 < last n := n.pos_of_neZero
theorem one_lt_last [NeZero n] : 1 < last (n + 1) := by
rw [lt_iff_val_lt_val, val_one, val_last, Nat.lt_add_left_iff_pos, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero]
exact NeZero.ne n
end Order
/-! ### Coercions to `ℤ` and the `fin_omega` tactic. -/
open Int
theorem coe_int_sub_eq_ite {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u - v : Fin n) : Int) = if v ≤ u then (u - v : Int) else (u - v : Int) + n := by
rw [Fin.sub_def]
split
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_sub_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
theorem coe_int_sub_eq_mod {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u - v : Fin n) : Int) = ((u : Int) - (v : Int)) % n := by
rw [coe_int_sub_eq_ite]
split
· rw [Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [Int.emod_eq_add_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
theorem coe_int_add_eq_ite {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u + v : Fin n) : Int) = if (u + v : ℕ) < n then (u + v : Int) else (u + v : Int) - n := by
rw [Fin.add_def]
split
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_sub_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
theorem coe_int_add_eq_mod {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u + v : Fin n) : Int) = ((u : Int) + (v : Int)) % n := by
rw [coe_int_add_eq_ite]
split
· rw [Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [Int.emod_eq_sub_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
-- Write `a + b` as `if (a + b : ℕ) < n then (a + b : ℤ) else (a + b : ℤ) - n` and
-- similarly `a - b` as `if (b : ℕ) ≤ a then (a - b : ℤ) else (a - b : ℤ) + n`.
attribute [fin_omega] coe_int_sub_eq_ite coe_int_add_eq_ite
-- Rewrite inequalities in `Fin` to inequalities in `ℕ`
attribute [fin_omega] Fin.lt_iff_val_lt_val Fin.le_iff_val_le_val
-- Rewrite `1 : Fin (n + 2)` to `1 : ℤ`
attribute [fin_omega] val_one
/--
Preprocessor for `omega` to handle inequalities in `Fin`.
Note that this involves a lot of case splitting, so may be slow.
-/
-- Further adjustment to the simp set can probably make this more powerful.
-- Please experiment and PR updates!
macro "fin_omega" : tactic => `(tactic|
{ try simp only [fin_omega, ← Int.ofNat_lt, ← Int.ofNat_le] at *
omega })
section Add
/-!
### addition, numerals, and coercion from Nat
-/
@[simp]
theorem val_one' (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : ((1 : Fin n) : ℕ) = 1 % n :=
rfl
@[deprecated val_one' (since := "2025-03-10")]
theorem val_one'' {n : ℕ} : ((1 : Fin (n + 1)) : ℕ) = 1 % (n + 1) :=
rfl
instance nontrivial {n : ℕ} : Nontrivial (Fin (n + 2)) where
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, (ne_iff_vne 0 1).mpr (by simp [val_one, val_zero])⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_two_le : Nontrivial (Fin n) ↔ 2 ≤ n := by
rcases n with (_ | _ | n) <;>
simp [Fin.nontrivial, not_nontrivial, Nat.succ_le_iff]
section Monoid
instance inhabitedFinOneAdd (n : ℕ) : Inhabited (Fin (1 + n)) :=
haveI : NeZero (1 + n) := by rw [Nat.add_comm]; infer_instance
inferInstance
@[simp]
theorem default_eq_zero (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (default : Fin n) = 0 :=
rfl
instance instNatCast [NeZero n] : NatCast (Fin n) where
natCast i := Fin.ofNat' n i
lemma natCast_def [NeZero n] (a : ℕ) : (a : Fin n) = ⟨a % n, mod_lt _ n.pos_of_neZero⟩ := rfl
end Monoid
theorem val_add_eq_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : Fin n) :
(↑(a + b) : ℕ) = if n ≤ a + b then a + b - n else a + b := by
rw [Fin.val_add, Nat.add_mod_eq_ite, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (show ↑a < n from a.2),
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (show ↑b < n from b.2)]
theorem val_add_eq_of_add_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin n} (huv : a.val + b.val < n) :
(a + b).val = a.val + b.val := by
rw [val_add]
simp [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt huv]
lemma intCast_val_sub_eq_sub_add_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : Fin n) :
((a - b).val : ℤ) = a.val - b.val + if b ≤ a then 0 else n := by
split <;> fin_omega
lemma one_le_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {k : Fin n} (hk : k ≠ 0) : 1 ≤ k := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (NeZero.ne n)
cases n with
| zero => simp only [Nat.reduceAdd, Fin.isValue, Fin.zero_le]
| succ n => rwa [Fin.le_iff_val_le_val, Fin.val_one, Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero, val_ne_zero_iff]
lemma val_sub_one_of_ne_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin n} (hi : i ≠ 0) : (i - 1).val = i - 1 := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (NeZero.ne n)
rw [Fin.sub_val_of_le (one_le_of_ne_zero hi), Fin.val_one', Nat.mod_eq_of_lt
(Nat.succ_le_iff.mpr (nontrivial_iff_two_le.mp <| nontrivial_of_ne i 0 hi))]
section OfNatCoe
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_eq_cast (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] (a : ℕ) : Fin.ofNat' n a = a :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma val_natCast (a n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (a : Fin n).val = a % n := rfl
/-- Converting an in-range number to `Fin (n + 1)` produces a result
whose value is the original number. -/
theorem val_cast_of_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a : ℕ} (h : a < n) : (a : Fin n).val = a :=
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h
/-- If `n` is non-zero, converting the value of a `Fin n` to `Fin n` results
in the same value. -/
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_val_eq_self {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : (a.val : Fin n) = a :=
Fin.ext <| val_cast_of_lt a.isLt
-- This is a special case of `CharP.cast_eq_zero` that doesn't require typeclass search
@[simp high] lemma natCast_self (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (n : Fin n) = 0 := by ext; simp
@[simp] lemma natCast_eq_zero {a n : ℕ} [NeZero n] : (a : Fin n) = 0 ↔ n ∣ a := by
simp [Fin.ext_iff, Nat.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem natCast_eq_last (n) : (n : Fin (n + 1)) = Fin.last n := by ext; simp
theorem le_val_last (i : Fin (n + 1)) : i ≤ n := by
rw [Fin.natCast_eq_last]
exact Fin.le_last i
variable {a b : ℕ}
lemma natCast_le_natCast (han : a ≤ n) (hbn : b ≤ n) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [← Nat.lt_succ_iff] at han hbn
simp [le_iff_val_le_val, -val_fin_le, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, han, hbn]
lemma natCast_lt_natCast (han : a ≤ n) (hbn : b ≤ n) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) < b ↔ a < b := by
rw [← Nat.lt_succ_iff] at han hbn; simp [lt_iff_val_lt_val, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, han, hbn]
lemma natCast_mono (hbn : b ≤ n) (hab : a ≤ b) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) ≤ b :=
(natCast_le_natCast (hab.trans hbn) hbn).2 hab
lemma natCast_strictMono (hbn : b ≤ n) (hab : a < b) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) < b :=
(natCast_lt_natCast (hab.le.trans hbn) hbn).2 hab
end OfNatCoe
end Add
section Succ
/-!
### succ and casts into larger Fin types
-/
lemma succ_injective (n : ℕ) : Injective (@Fin.succ n) := fun a b ↦ by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
/-- `Fin.succ` as an `Embedding` -/
def succEmb (n : ℕ) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + 1) where
toFun := succ
inj' := succ_injective _
@[simp]
theorem coe_succEmb : ⇑(succEmb n) = Fin.succ :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-12")]
alias val_succEmb := coe_succEmb
@[simp]
theorem exists_succ_eq {x : Fin (n + 1)} : (∃ y, Fin.succ y = x) ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hy⟩ => hy ▸ succ_ne_zero _, x.cases (fun h => h.irrefl.elim) (fun _ _ => ⟨_, rfl⟩)⟩
theorem exists_succ_eq_of_ne_zero {x : Fin (n + 1)} (h : x ≠ 0) :
∃ y, Fin.succ y = x := exists_succ_eq.mpr h
@[simp]
theorem succ_zero_eq_one' [NeZero n] : Fin.succ (0 : Fin n) = 1 := by
cases n
· exact (NeZero.ne 0 rfl).elim
· rfl
theorem one_pos' [NeZero n] : (0 : Fin (n + 1)) < 1 := succ_zero_eq_one' (n := n) ▸ succ_pos _
theorem zero_ne_one' [NeZero n] : (0 : Fin (n + 1)) ≠ 1 := Fin.ne_of_lt one_pos'
/--
The `Fin.succ_one_eq_two` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+2)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem succ_one_eq_two' [NeZero n] : Fin.succ (1 : Fin (n + 1)) = 2 := by
cases n
· exact (NeZero.ne 0 rfl).elim
· rfl
-- Version of `succ_one_eq_two` to be used by `dsimp`.
-- Note the `'` swapped around due to a move to std4.
/--
The `Fin.le_zero_iff` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem le_zero_iff' {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {k : Fin n} : k ≤ 0 ↔ k = 0 :=
⟨fun h => Fin.ext <| by rw [Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero h]; rfl, by rintro rfl; exact Nat.le_refl _⟩
-- TODO: Move to Batteries
@[simp] lemma castLE_inj {hmn : m ≤ n} {a b : Fin m} : castLE hmn a = castLE hmn b ↔ a = b := by
simp [Fin.ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma castAdd_inj {a b : Fin m} : castAdd n a = castAdd n b ↔ a = b := by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
attribute [simp] castSucc_inj
lemma castLE_injective (hmn : m ≤ n) : Injective (castLE hmn) :=
fun _ _ hab ↦ Fin.ext (congr_arg val hab :)
lemma castAdd_injective (m n : ℕ) : Injective (@Fin.castAdd m n) := castLE_injective _
lemma castSucc_injective (n : ℕ) : Injective (@Fin.castSucc n) := castAdd_injective _ _
/-- `Fin.castLE` as an `Embedding`, `castLEEmb h i` embeds `i` into a larger `Fin` type. -/
@[simps apply]
def castLEEmb (h : n ≤ m) : Fin n ↪ Fin m where
toFun := castLE h
inj' := castLE_injective _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_castLEEmb {m n} (hmn : m ≤ n) : castLEEmb hmn = castLE hmn := rfl
/- The next proof can be golfed a lot using `Fintype.card`.
It is written this way to define `ENat.card` and `Nat.card` without a `Fintype` dependency
(not done yet). -/
lemma nonempty_embedding_iff : Nonempty (Fin n ↪ Fin m) ↔ n ≤ m := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ⟨castLEEmb h⟩⟩
induction n generalizing m with
| zero => exact m.zero_le
| succ n ihn =>
obtain ⟨e⟩ := h
rcases exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (pos_iff_nonempty.2 (Nonempty.map e inferInstance)).ne'
with ⟨m, rfl⟩
refine Nat.succ_le_succ <| ihn ⟨?_⟩
refine ⟨fun i ↦ (e.setValue 0 0 i.succ).pred (mt e.setValue_eq_iff.1 i.succ_ne_zero),
fun i j h ↦ ?_⟩
simpa only [pred_inj, EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq, succ_inj] using h
lemma equiv_iff_eq : Nonempty (Fin m ≃ Fin n) ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun ⟨e⟩ ↦ le_antisymm (nonempty_embedding_iff.1 ⟨e⟩) (nonempty_embedding_iff.1 ⟨e.symm⟩),
fun h ↦ h ▸ ⟨.refl _⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma castLE_castSucc {n m} (i : Fin n) (h : n + 1 ≤ m) :
i.castSucc.castLE h = i.castLE (Nat.le_of_succ_le h) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma castLE_comp_castSucc {n m} (h : n + 1 ≤ m) :
Fin.castLE h ∘ Fin.castSucc = Fin.castLE (Nat.le_of_succ_le h) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma castLE_rfl (n : ℕ) : Fin.castLE (le_refl n) = id :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem range_castLE {n k : ℕ} (h : n ≤ k) : Set.range (castLE h) = { i : Fin k | (i : ℕ) < n } :=
Set.ext fun x => ⟨fun ⟨y, hy⟩ => hy ▸ y.2, fun hx => ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_of_injective_castLE_symm {n k : ℕ} (h : n ≤ k) (i : Fin k) (hi) :
((Equiv.ofInjective _ (castLE_injective h)).symm ⟨i, hi⟩ : ℕ) = i := by
rw [← coe_castLE h]
exact congr_arg Fin.val (Equiv.apply_ofInjective_symm _ _)
theorem leftInverse_cast (eq : n = m) : LeftInverse (Fin.cast eq.symm) (Fin.cast eq) :=
fun _ => rfl
theorem rightInverse_cast (eq : n = m) : RightInverse (Fin.cast eq.symm) (Fin.cast eq) :=
fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_inj (eq : n = m) {a b : Fin n} : a.cast eq = b.cast eq ↔ a = b := by
simp [← val_inj]
@[simp]
theorem cast_lt_cast (eq : n = m) {a b : Fin n} : a.cast eq < b.cast eq ↔ a < b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_le_cast (eq : n = m) {a b : Fin n} : a.cast eq ≤ b.cast eq ↔ a ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
/-- The 'identity' equivalence between `Fin m` and `Fin n` when `m = n`. -/
@[simps]
def _root_.finCongr (eq : n = m) : Fin n ≃ Fin m where
toFun := Fin.cast eq
invFun := Fin.cast eq.symm
left_inv := leftInverse_cast eq
right_inv := rightInverse_cast eq
@[simp] lemma _root_.finCongr_apply_mk (h : m = n) (k : ℕ) (hk : k < m) :
finCongr h ⟨k, hk⟩ = ⟨k, h ▸ hk⟩ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma _root_.finCongr_refl (h : n = n := rfl) : finCongr h = Equiv.refl (Fin n) := by ext; simp
@[simp] lemma _root_.finCongr_symm (h : m = n) : (finCongr h).symm = finCongr h.symm := rfl
@[simp] lemma _root_.finCongr_apply_coe (h : m = n) (k : Fin m) : (finCongr h k : ℕ) = k := rfl
lemma _root_.finCongr_symm_apply_coe (h : m = n) (k : Fin n) : ((finCongr h).symm k : ℕ) = k := rfl
/-- While in many cases `finCongr` is better than `Equiv.cast`/`cast`, sometimes we want to apply
a generic theorem about `cast`. -/
lemma _root_.finCongr_eq_equivCast (h : n = m) : finCongr h = .cast (h ▸ rfl) := by subst h; simp
/-- While in many cases `Fin.cast` is better than `Equiv.cast`/`cast`, sometimes we want to apply
a generic theorem about `cast`. -/
theorem cast_eq_cast (h : n = m) : (Fin.cast h : Fin n → Fin m) = _root_.cast (h ▸ rfl) := by
subst h
ext
rfl
/-- `Fin.castAdd` as an `Embedding`, `castAddEmb m i` embeds `i : Fin n` in `Fin (n+m)`.
See also `Fin.natAddEmb` and `Fin.addNatEmb`. -/
def castAddEmb (m) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + m) := castLEEmb (le_add_right n m)
@[simp]
lemma coe_castAddEmb (m) : (castAddEmb m : Fin n → Fin (n + m)) = castAdd m := rfl
lemma castAddEmb_apply (m) (i : Fin n) : castAddEmb m i = castAdd m i := rfl
/-- `Fin.castSucc` as an `Embedding`, `castSuccEmb i` embeds `i : Fin n` in `Fin (n+1)`. -/
def castSuccEmb : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + 1) := castAddEmb _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_castSuccEmb : (castSuccEmb : Fin n → Fin (n + 1)) = Fin.castSucc := rfl
lemma castSuccEmb_apply (i : Fin n) : castSuccEmb i = i.castSucc := rfl
theorem castSucc_le_succ {n} (i : Fin n) : i.castSucc ≤ i.succ := Nat.le_succ i
@[simp] theorem castSucc_le_castSucc_iff {a b : Fin n} : castSucc a ≤ castSucc b ↔ a ≤ b := .rfl
@[simp] theorem succ_le_castSucc_iff {a b : Fin n} : succ a ≤ castSucc b ↔ a < b := by
rw [le_castSucc_iff, succ_lt_succ_iff]
@[simp] theorem castSucc_lt_succ_iff {a b : Fin n} : castSucc a < succ b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le, succ_le_succ_iff]
theorem le_of_castSucc_lt_of_succ_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} {i : Fin n}
(hl : castSucc i < a) (hu : b < succ i) : b < a := by
simp [Fin.lt_def, -val_fin_lt] at *; omega
theorem castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : castSucc i < p ∨ p < i.succ := by
simp [Fin.lt_def, -val_fin_lt]; omega
theorem succ_le_or_le_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : succ i ≤ p ∨ p ≤ i.castSucc := by
rw [le_castSucc_iff, ← castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le]
exact p.castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ i
theorem eq_castSucc_of_ne_last {x : Fin (n + 1)} (h : x ≠ (last _)) :
∃ y, Fin.castSucc y = x := exists_castSucc_eq.mpr h
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias exists_castSucc_eq_of_ne_last := eq_castSucc_of_ne_last
theorem forall_fin_succ' {P : Fin (n + 1) → Prop} :
(∀ i, P i) ↔ (∀ i : Fin n, P i.castSucc) ∧ P (.last _) :=
⟨fun H => ⟨fun _ => H _, H _⟩, fun ⟨H0, H1⟩ i => Fin.lastCases H1 H0 i⟩
-- to match `Fin.eq_zero_or_eq_succ`
theorem eq_castSucc_or_eq_last {n : Nat} (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
(∃ j : Fin n, i = j.castSucc) ∨ i = last n := i.lastCases (Or.inr rfl) (Or.inl ⟨·, rfl⟩)
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_ne_last {n : ℕ} (i : Fin n) : i.castSucc ≠ .last n :=
Fin.ne_of_lt i.castSucc_lt_last
theorem exists_fin_succ' {P : Fin (n + 1) → Prop} :
(∃ i, P i) ↔ (∃ i : Fin n, P i.castSucc) ∨ P (.last _) :=
⟨fun ⟨i, h⟩ => Fin.lastCases Or.inr (fun i hi => Or.inl ⟨i, hi⟩) i h,
fun h => h.elim (fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨i.castSucc, hi⟩) (fun h => ⟨.last _, h⟩)⟩
/--
The `Fin.castSucc_zero` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_zero' [NeZero n] : castSucc (0 : Fin n) = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_pos_iff [NeZero n] {i : Fin n} : 0 < castSucc i ↔ 0 < i := by simp [← val_pos_iff]
/-- `castSucc i` is positive when `i` is positive.
The `Fin.castSucc_pos` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis. -/
alias ⟨_, castSucc_pos'⟩ := castSucc_pos_iff
/--
The `Fin.castSucc_eq_zero_iff` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_eq_zero_iff' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : castSucc a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
Fin.ext_iff.trans <| (Fin.ext_iff.trans <| by simp).symm
/--
The `Fin.castSucc_ne_zero_iff` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
theorem castSucc_ne_zero_iff' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : castSucc a ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
not_iff_not.mpr <| castSucc_eq_zero_iff' a
theorem castSucc_ne_zero_of_lt {p i : Fin n} (h : p < i) : castSucc i ≠ 0 := by
cases n
· exact i.elim0
· rw [castSucc_ne_zero_iff', Ne, Fin.ext_iff]
exact ((zero_le _).trans_lt h).ne'
theorem succ_ne_last_iff (a : Fin (n + 1)) : succ a ≠ last (n + 1) ↔ a ≠ last n :=
not_iff_not.mpr <| succ_eq_last_succ
theorem succ_ne_last_of_lt {p i : Fin n} (h : i < p) : succ i ≠ last n := by
cases n
· exact i.elim0
· rw [succ_ne_last_iff, Ne, Fin.ext_iff]
exact ((le_last _).trans_lt' h).ne
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem coe_eq_castSucc {a : Fin n} : (a : Fin (n + 1)) = castSucc a := by
ext
exact val_cast_of_lt (Nat.lt.step a.is_lt)
theorem coe_succ_lt_iff_lt {n : ℕ} {j k : Fin n} : (j : Fin <| n + 1) < k ↔ j < k := by
simp only [coe_eq_castSucc, castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff]
@[simp]
theorem range_castSucc {n : ℕ} : Set.range (castSucc : Fin n → Fin n.succ) =
({ i | (i : ℕ) < n } : Set (Fin n.succ)) := range_castLE (by omega)
@[simp]
theorem coe_of_injective_castSucc_symm {n : ℕ} (i : Fin n.succ) (hi) :
((Equiv.ofInjective castSucc (castSucc_injective _)).symm ⟨i, hi⟩ : ℕ) = i := by
rw [← coe_castSucc]
exact congr_arg val (Equiv.apply_ofInjective_symm _ _)
/-- `Fin.addNat` as an `Embedding`, `addNatEmb m i` adds `m` to `i`, generalizes `Fin.succ`. -/
@[simps! apply]
def addNatEmb (m) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + m) where
toFun := (addNat · m)
inj' a b := by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
/-- `Fin.natAdd` as an `Embedding`, `natAddEmb n i` adds `n` to `i` "on the left". -/
@[simps! apply]
def natAddEmb (n) {m} : Fin m ↪ Fin (n + m) where
toFun := natAdd n
inj' a b := by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
theorem castSucc_castAdd (i : Fin n) : castSucc (castAdd m i) = castAdd (m + 1) i := rfl
theorem castSucc_natAdd (i : Fin m) : castSucc (natAdd n i) = natAdd n (castSucc i) := rfl
theorem succ_castAdd (i : Fin n) : succ (castAdd m i) =
if h : i.succ = last _ then natAdd n (0 : Fin (m + 1))
else castAdd (m + 1) ⟨i.1 + 1, lt_of_le_of_ne i.2 (Fin.val_ne_iff.mpr h)⟩ := by
split_ifs with h
exacts [Fin.ext (congr_arg Fin.val h :), rfl]
theorem succ_natAdd (i : Fin m) : succ (natAdd n i) = natAdd n (succ i) := rfl
end Succ
section Pred
/-!
### pred
-/
theorem pred_one' [NeZero n] (h := (zero_ne_one' (n := n)).symm) :
Fin.pred (1 : Fin (n + 1)) h = 0 := by
simp_rw [Fin.ext_iff, coe_pred, val_one', val_zero, Nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le, Nat.mod_le]
theorem pred_last (h := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 last_pos'.ne') :
pred (last (n + 1)) h = last n := by simp_rw [← succ_last, pred_succ]
theorem pred_lt_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : pred i hi < j ↔ i < succ j := by
rw [← succ_lt_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem lt_pred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : j < pred i hi ↔ succ j < i := by
rw [← succ_lt_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem pred_le_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : pred i hi ≤ j ↔ i ≤ succ j := by
rw [← succ_le_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem le_pred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : j ≤ pred i hi ↔ succ j ≤ i := by
rw [← succ_le_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0)
(ha' := castSucc_ne_zero_iff.mpr ha) :
(a.pred ha).castSucc = (castSucc a).pred ha' := rfl
theorem castSucc_pred_add_one_eq {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(a.pred ha).castSucc + 1 = a := by
cases a using cases
· exact (ha rfl).elim
· rw [pred_succ, coeSucc_eq_succ]
theorem le_pred_castSucc_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : castSucc a ≠ 0) :
b ≤ (castSucc a).pred ha ↔ b < a := by
rw [le_pred_iff, succ_le_castSucc_iff]
theorem pred_castSucc_lt_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : castSucc a ≠ 0) :
(castSucc a).pred ha < b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [pred_lt_iff, castSucc_lt_succ_iff]
theorem pred_castSucc_lt {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : castSucc a ≠ 0) :
(castSucc a).pred ha < a := by rw [pred_castSucc_lt_iff, le_def]
theorem le_castSucc_pred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
b ≤ castSucc (a.pred ha) ↔ b < a := by
rw [castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc, le_pred_castSucc_iff]
theorem castSucc_pred_lt_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
castSucc (a.pred ha) < b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc, pred_castSucc_lt_iff]
theorem castSucc_pred_lt {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
castSucc (a.pred ha) < a := by rw [castSucc_pred_lt_iff, le_def]
end Pred
section CastPred
/-- `castPred i` sends `i : Fin (n + 1)` to `Fin n` as long as i ≠ last n. -/
@[inline] def castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≠ last n) : Fin n := castLT i (val_lt_last h)
@[simp]
lemma castLT_eq_castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i < last _) (h' := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 h.ne) :
castLT i h = castPred i h' := rfl
@[simp]
lemma coe_castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≠ last _) : (castPred i h : ℕ) = i := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castPred_castSucc {i : Fin n} (h' := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 (castSucc_lt_last i).ne) :
castPred (castSucc i) h' = i := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≠ last n) :
castSucc (i.castPred h) = i := by
rcases exists_castSucc_eq.mpr h with ⟨y, rfl⟩
rw [castPred_castSucc]
theorem castPred_eq_iff_eq_castSucc (i : Fin (n + 1)) (hi : i ≠ last _) (j : Fin n) :
castPred i hi = j ↔ i = castSucc j :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← h, castSucc_castPred], fun h => by simp_rw [h, castPred_castSucc]⟩
@[simp]
theorem castPred_mk (i : ℕ) (h₁ : i < n) (h₂ := h₁.trans (Nat.lt_succ_self _))
(h₃ : ⟨i, h₂⟩ ≠ last _ := (ne_iff_vne _ _).mpr (val_last _ ▸ h₁.ne)) :
castPred ⟨i, h₂⟩ h₃ = ⟨i, h₁⟩ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castPred_le_castPred_iff {i j : Fin (n + 1)} {hi : i ≠ last n} {hj : j ≠ last n} :
castPred i hi ≤ castPred j hj ↔ i ≤ j := Iff.rfl
/-- A version of the right-to-left implication of `castPred_le_castPred_iff`
that deduces `i ≠ last n` from `i ≤ j` and `j ≠ last n`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem castPred_le_castPred {i j : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i ≤ j) (hj : j ≠ last n) :
castPred i (by rw [← lt_last_iff_ne_last] at hj ⊢; exact Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt h hj) ≤
castPred j hj :=
h
@[simp]
theorem castPred_lt_castPred_iff {i j : Fin (n + 1)} {hi : i ≠ last n} {hj : j ≠ last n} :
castPred i hi < castPred j hj ↔ i < j := Iff.rfl
/-- A version of the right-to-left implication of `castPred_lt_castPred_iff`
that deduces `i ≠ last n` from `i < j`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem castPred_lt_castPred {i j : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i < j) (hj : j ≠ last n) :
castPred i (ne_last_of_lt h) < castPred j hj := h
theorem castPred_lt_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
castPred i hi < j ↔ i < castSucc j := by
rw [← castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
theorem lt_castPred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
j < castPred i hi ↔ castSucc j < i := by
rw [← castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
theorem castPred_le_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
castPred i hi ≤ j ↔ i ≤ castSucc j := by
rw [← castSucc_le_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
theorem le_castPred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
j ≤ castPred i hi ↔ castSucc j ≤ i := by
rw [← castSucc_le_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
@[simp]
theorem castPred_inj {i j : Fin (n + 1)} {hi : i ≠ last n} {hj : j ≠ last n} :
castPred i hi = castPred j hj ↔ i = j := by
simp_rw [Fin.ext_iff, le_antisymm_iff, ← le_def, castPred_le_castPred_iff]
theorem castPred_zero' [NeZero n] (h := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 last_pos'.ne) :
castPred (0 : Fin (n + 1)) h = 0 := rfl
theorem castPred_zero (h := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 last_pos.ne) :
castPred (0 : Fin (n + 2)) h = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castPred_eq_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i ≠ last n) :
Fin.castPred i h = 0 ↔ i = 0 := by
rw [← castPred_zero', castPred_inj]
@[simp]
theorem castPred_one [NeZero n] (h := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 one_lt_last.ne) :
castPred (1 : Fin (n + 2)) h = 1 := by
cases n
· exact subsingleton_one.elim _ 1
· rfl
theorem succ_castPred_eq_castPred_succ {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n)
(ha' := a.succ_ne_last_iff.mpr ha) :
(a.castPred ha).succ = (succ a).castPred ha' := rfl
theorem succ_castPred_eq_add_one {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
(a.castPred ha).succ = a + 1 := by
cases a using lastCases
· exact (ha rfl).elim
· rw [castPred_castSucc, coeSucc_eq_succ]
theorem castpred_succ_le_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : succ a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
(succ a).castPred ha ≤ b ↔ a < b := by
rw [castPred_le_iff, succ_le_castSucc_iff]
theorem lt_castPred_succ_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : succ a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
b < (succ a).castPred ha ↔ b ≤ a := by
rw [lt_castPred_iff, castSucc_lt_succ_iff]
theorem lt_castPred_succ {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : succ a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
a < (succ a).castPred ha := by rw [lt_castPred_succ_iff, le_def]
theorem succ_castPred_le_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
succ (a.castPred ha) ≤ b ↔ a < b := by
rw [succ_castPred_eq_castPred_succ ha, castpred_succ_le_iff]
theorem lt_succ_castPred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
b < succ (a.castPred ha) ↔ b ≤ a := by
rw [succ_castPred_eq_castPred_succ ha, lt_castPred_succ_iff]
theorem lt_succ_castPred {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
a < succ (a.castPred ha) := by rw [lt_succ_castPred_iff, le_def]
theorem castPred_le_pred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
castPred a ha ≤ pred b hb ↔ a < b := by
rw [le_pred_iff, succ_castPred_le_iff]
theorem pred_lt_castPred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ last n) :
pred a ha < castPred b hb ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [lt_castPred_iff, castSucc_pred_lt_iff ha]
theorem pred_lt_castPred {a : Fin (n + 1)} (h₁ : a ≠ 0) (h₂ : a ≠ last n) :
pred a h₁ < castPred a h₂ := by
rw [pred_lt_castPred_iff, le_def]
end CastPred
section SuccAbove
variable {p : Fin (n + 1)} {i j : Fin n}
/-- `succAbove p i` embeds `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p`. -/
def succAbove (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : Fin (n + 1) :=
if castSucc i < p then i.castSucc else i.succ
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p : Fin (n + 1)`
embeds `i` by `castSucc` when the resulting `i.castSucc < p`. -/
lemma succAbove_of_castSucc_lt (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : castSucc i < p) :
p.succAbove i = castSucc i := if_pos h
lemma succAbove_of_succ_le (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : succ i ≤ p) :
p.succAbove i = castSucc i :=
succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le.mpr h)
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p : Fin (n + 1)`
embeds `i` by `succ` when the resulting `p < i.succ`. -/
lemma succAbove_of_le_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : p ≤ castSucc i) :
p.succAbove i = i.succ := if_neg (Fin.not_lt.2 h)
lemma succAbove_of_lt_succ (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : p < succ i) :
p.succAbove i = succ i := succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (le_castSucc_iff.mpr h)
lemma succAbove_succ_of_lt (p i : Fin n) (h : p < i) : succAbove p.succ i = i.succ :=
succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_lt_succ_iff.mpr h)
lemma succAbove_succ_of_le (p i : Fin n) (h : i ≤ p) : succAbove p.succ i = i.castSucc :=
succAbove_of_succ_le _ _ (succ_le_succ_iff.mpr h)
@[simp] lemma succAbove_succ_self (j : Fin n) : j.succ.succAbove j = j.castSucc :=
succAbove_succ_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl
lemma succAbove_castSucc_of_lt (p i : Fin n) (h : i < p) : succAbove p.castSucc i = i.castSucc :=
succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff.2 h)
lemma succAbove_castSucc_of_le (p i : Fin n) (h : p ≤ i) : succAbove p.castSucc i = i.succ :=
succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_le_castSucc_iff.2 h)
@[simp] lemma succAbove_castSucc_self (j : Fin n) : succAbove j.castSucc j = j.succ :=
succAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl
lemma succAbove_pred_of_lt (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p < i)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_gt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt p.zero_le h) : succAbove p (i.pred hi) = i := by
rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_pred _ _ ▸ h), succ_pred]
lemma succAbove_pred_of_le (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≤ p) (hi : i ≠ 0) :
succAbove p (i.pred hi) = (i.pred hi).castSucc := succAbove_of_succ_le _ _ (succ_pred _ _ ▸ h)
@[simp] lemma succAbove_pred_self (p : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p ≠ 0) :
succAbove p (p.pred h) = (p.pred h).castSucc := succAbove_pred_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl h
lemma succAbove_castPred_of_lt (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i < p)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_lt <| Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h p.le_last) : succAbove p (i.castPred hi) = i := by
rw [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_castPred _ _ ▸ h), castSucc_castPred]
lemma succAbove_castPred_of_le (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p ≤ i) (hi : i ≠ last n) :
succAbove p (i.castPred hi) = (i.castPred hi).succ :=
succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_castPred _ _ ▸ h)
lemma succAbove_castPred_self (p : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p ≠ last n) :
succAbove p (p.castPred h) = (p.castPred h).succ := succAbove_castPred_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl h
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p : Fin (n + 1)`
never results in `p` itself -/
@[simp]
lemma succAbove_ne (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : p.succAbove i ≠ p := by
rcases p.castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ i with (h | h)
· rw [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h]
exact Fin.ne_of_lt h
· rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ h]
exact Fin.ne_of_gt h
@[simp]
lemma ne_succAbove (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : p ≠ p.succAbove i := (succAbove_ne _ _).symm
/-- Given a fixed pivot `p : Fin (n + 1)`, `p.succAbove` is injective. -/
lemma succAbove_right_injective : Injective p.succAbove := by
rintro i j hij
unfold succAbove at hij
| split_ifs at hij with hi hj hj
· exact castSucc_injective _ hij
· rw [hij] at hi
| Mathlib/Data/Fin/Basic.lean | 1,005 | 1,007 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash, Antoine Labelle
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dual.Lemmas
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.ToLin
/-!
# Contractions
Given modules $M, N$ over a commutative ring $R$, this file defines the natural linear maps:
$M^* \otimes M \to R$, $M \otimes M^* \to R$, and $M^* \otimes N → Hom(M, N)$, as well as proving
some basic properties of these maps.
## Tags
contraction, dual module, tensor product
-/
suppress_compilation
variable {ι : Type*} (R M N P Q : Type*)
-- Porting note: we need high priority for this to fire first; not the case in ML3
attribute [local ext high] TensorProduct.ext
section Contraction
open TensorProduct LinearMap Matrix Module
open TensorProduct
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid N] [AddCommMonoid P] [AddCommMonoid Q]
variable [Module R M] [Module R N] [Module R P] [Module R Q]
variable [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] (b : Basis ι R M)
/-- The natural left-handed pairing between a module and its dual. -/
def contractLeft : Module.Dual R M ⊗[R] M →ₗ[R] R :=
(uncurry _ _ _ _).toFun LinearMap.id
/-- The natural right-handed pairing between a module and its dual. -/
def contractRight : M ⊗[R] Module.Dual R M →ₗ[R] R :=
(uncurry _ _ _ _).toFun (LinearMap.flip LinearMap.id)
/-- The natural map associating a linear map to the tensor product of two modules. -/
def dualTensorHom : Module.Dual R M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] N :=
let M' := Module.Dual R M
(uncurry R M' N (M →ₗ[R] N) : _ → M' ⊗ N →ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] N) LinearMap.smulRightₗ
variable {R M N P Q}
@[simp]
theorem contractLeft_apply (f : Module.Dual R M) (m : M) : contractLeft R M (f ⊗ₜ m) = f m :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem contractRight_apply (f : Module.Dual R M) (m : M) : contractRight R M (m ⊗ₜ f) = f m :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dualTensorHom_apply (f : Module.Dual R M) (m : M) (n : N) :
dualTensorHom R M N (f ⊗ₜ n) m = f m • n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem transpose_dualTensorHom (f : Module.Dual R M) (m : M) :
Dual.transpose (R := R) (dualTensorHom R M M (f ⊗ₜ m)) =
dualTensorHom R _ _ (Dual.eval R M m ⊗ₜ f) := by
ext f' m'
simp only [Dual.transpose_apply, coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, dualTensorHom_apply,
LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ, RingHom.id_apply, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, Dual.eval_apply,
LinearMap.smul_apply]
exact mul_comm _ _
@[simp]
theorem dualTensorHom_prodMap_zero (f : Module.Dual R M) (p : P) :
((dualTensorHom R M P) (f ⊗ₜ[R] p)).prodMap (0 : N →ₗ[R] Q) =
dualTensorHom R (M × N) (P × Q) ((f ∘ₗ fst R M N) ⊗ₜ inl R P Q p) := by
ext <;>
simp only [coe_comp, coe_inl, Function.comp_apply, prodMap_apply, dualTensorHom_apply,
fst_apply, Prod.smul_mk, LinearMap.zero_apply, smul_zero]
@[simp]
theorem zero_prodMap_dualTensorHom (g : Module.Dual R N) (q : Q) :
(0 : M →ₗ[R] P).prodMap ((dualTensorHom R N Q) (g ⊗ₜ[R] q)) =
dualTensorHom R (M × N) (P × Q) ((g ∘ₗ snd R M N) ⊗ₜ inr R P Q q) := by
ext <;>
simp only [coe_comp, coe_inr, Function.comp_apply, prodMap_apply, dualTensorHom_apply,
snd_apply, Prod.smul_mk, LinearMap.zero_apply, smul_zero]
theorem map_dualTensorHom (f : Module.Dual R M) (p : P) (g : Module.Dual R N) (q : Q) :
TensorProduct.map (dualTensorHom R M P (f ⊗ₜ[R] p)) (dualTensorHom R N Q (g ⊗ₜ[R] q)) =
dualTensorHom R (M ⊗[R] N) (P ⊗[R] Q) (dualDistrib R M N (f ⊗ₜ g) ⊗ₜ[R] p ⊗ₜ[R] q) := by
ext m n
simp only [compr₂_apply, mk_apply, map_tmul, dualTensorHom_apply, dualDistrib_apply, ←
smul_tmul_smul]
@[simp]
theorem comp_dualTensorHom (f : Module.Dual R M) (n : N) (g : Module.Dual R N) (p : P) :
dualTensorHom R N P (g ⊗ₜ[R] p) ∘ₗ dualTensorHom R M N (f ⊗ₜ[R] n) =
g n • dualTensorHom R M P (f ⊗ₜ p) := by
ext m
simp only [coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, dualTensorHom_apply, LinearMap.map_smul,
RingHom.id_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply]
rw [smul_comm]
/-- As a matrix, `dualTensorHom` evaluated on a basis element of `M* ⊗ N` is a matrix with a
single one and zeros elsewhere -/
theorem toMatrix_dualTensorHom {m : Type*} {n : Type*} [Fintype m] [Finite n] [DecidableEq m]
[DecidableEq n] (bM : Basis m R M) (bN : Basis n R N) (j : m) (i : n) :
toMatrix bM bN (dualTensorHom R M N (bM.coord j ⊗ₜ bN i)) = stdBasisMatrix i j 1 := by
ext i' j'
by_cases hij : i = i' ∧ j = j' <;>
simp [LinearMap.toMatrix_apply, Finsupp.single_eq_pi_single, hij]
rw [and_iff_not_or_not, Classical.not_not] at hij
rcases hij with hij | hij <;> simp [hij]
end CommSemiring
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup N] [AddCommGroup P] [AddCommGroup Q]
variable [Module R M] [Module R N] [Module R P] [Module R Q]
variable [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] (b : Basis ι R M)
variable {R M N P Q}
/-- If `M` is free, the natural linear map $M^* ⊗ N → Hom(M, N)$ is an equivalence. This function
provides this equivalence in return for a basis of `M`. -/
-- We manually create simp-lemmas because `@[simps]` generates a malformed lemma
noncomputable def dualTensorHomEquivOfBasis : Module.Dual R M ⊗[R] N ≃ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] N :=
LinearEquiv.ofLinear (dualTensorHom R M N)
(∑ i, TensorProduct.mk R _ N (b.dualBasis i) ∘ₗ (LinearMap.applyₗ (R := R) (b i)))
(by
ext f m
simp only [applyₗ_apply_apply, coeFn_sum, dualTensorHom_apply, mk_apply, id_coe, _root_.id,
Fintype.sum_apply, Function.comp_apply, Basis.coe_dualBasis, coe_comp, Basis.coord_apply, ←
f.map_smul, _root_.map_sum (dualTensorHom R M N), ← _root_.map_sum f, b.sum_repr])
(by
ext f m
simp only [applyₗ_apply_apply, coeFn_sum, dualTensorHom_apply, mk_apply, id_coe, _root_.id,
Fintype.sum_apply, Function.comp_apply, Basis.coe_dualBasis, coe_comp, compr₂_apply,
tmul_smul, smul_tmul', ← sum_tmul, Basis.sum_dual_apply_smul_coord])
@[simp]
theorem dualTensorHomEquivOfBasis_apply (x : Module.Dual R M ⊗[R] N) :
dualTensorHomEquivOfBasis b x = dualTensorHom R M N x := by
ext; rfl
@[simp]
theorem dualTensorHomEquivOfBasis_toLinearMap :
(dualTensorHomEquivOfBasis b).toLinearMap = dualTensorHom R M N :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dualTensorHomEquivOfBasis_symm_cancel_left (x : Module.Dual R M ⊗[R] N) :
(dualTensorHomEquivOfBasis b).symm (dualTensorHom R M N x) = x := by
rw [← dualTensorHomEquivOfBasis_apply b,
LinearEquiv.symm_apply_apply <| dualTensorHomEquivOfBasis (N := N) b]
@[simp]
theorem dualTensorHomEquivOfBasis_symm_cancel_right (x : M →ₗ[R] N) :
dualTensorHom R M N ((dualTensorHomEquivOfBasis b).symm x) = x := by
rw [← dualTensorHomEquivOfBasis_apply b, LinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply]
variable (R M N P Q)
variable [Module.Free R M] [Module.Finite R M]
/-- If `M` is finite free, the natural map $M^* ⊗ N → Hom(M, N)$ is an
equivalence. -/
@[simp]
noncomputable def dualTensorHomEquiv : Module.Dual R M ⊗[R] N ≃ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] N :=
dualTensorHomEquivOfBasis (Module.Free.chooseBasis R M)
end CommRing
end Contraction
section HomTensorHom
open TensorProduct
open Module TensorProduct LinearMap
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup N] [AddCommGroup P] [AddCommGroup Q]
variable [Module R M] [Module R N] [Module R P] [Module R Q]
variable [Free R M] [Module.Finite R M] [Free R N] [Module.Finite R N]
/-- When `M` is a finite free module, the map `lTensorHomToHomLTensor` is an equivalence. Note
that `lTensorHomEquivHomLTensor` is not defined directly in terms of
`lTensorHomToHomLTensor`, but the equivalence between the two is given by
`lTensorHomEquivHomLTensor_toLinearMap` and `lTensorHomEquivHomLTensor_apply`. -/
noncomputable def lTensorHomEquivHomLTensor : P ⊗[R] (M →ₗ[R] Q) ≃ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] P ⊗[R] Q :=
congr (LinearEquiv.refl R P) (dualTensorHomEquiv R M Q).symm ≪≫ₗ
TensorProduct.leftComm R P _ Q ≪≫ₗ
dualTensorHomEquiv R M _
/-- When `M` is a finite free module, the map `rTensorHomToHomRTensor` is an equivalence. Note
that `rTensorHomEquivHomRTensor` is not defined directly in terms of
`rTensorHomToHomRTensor`, but the equivalence between the two is given by
`rTensorHomEquivHomRTensor_toLinearMap` and `rTensorHomEquivHomRTensor_apply`. -/
noncomputable def rTensorHomEquivHomRTensor : (M →ₗ[R] P) ⊗[R] Q ≃ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] P ⊗[R] Q :=
congr (dualTensorHomEquiv R M P).symm (LinearEquiv.refl R Q) ≪≫ₗ TensorProduct.assoc R _ P Q ≪≫ₗ
dualTensorHomEquiv R M _
@[simp]
theorem lTensorHomEquivHomLTensor_toLinearMap :
(lTensorHomEquivHomLTensor R M P Q).toLinearMap = lTensorHomToHomLTensor R M P Q := by
let e := congr (LinearEquiv.refl R P) (dualTensorHomEquiv R M Q)
have h : Function.Surjective e.toLinearMap := e.surjective
refine (cancel_right h).1 ?_
ext f q m
simp only [e, lTensorHomEquivHomLTensor, dualTensorHomEquiv, LinearEquiv.comp_coe, compr₂_apply,
mk_apply, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, LinearEquiv.trans_apply, congr_tmul, LinearEquiv.refl_apply,
dualTensorHomEquivOfBasis_apply, dualTensorHomEquivOfBasis_symm_cancel_left, leftComm_tmul,
dualTensorHom_apply, coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, lTensorHomToHomLTensor_apply, tmul_smul]
@[simp]
theorem rTensorHomEquivHomRTensor_toLinearMap :
(rTensorHomEquivHomRTensor R M P Q).toLinearMap = rTensorHomToHomRTensor R M P Q := by
let e := congr (dualTensorHomEquiv R M P) (LinearEquiv.refl R Q)
have h : Function.Surjective e.toLinearMap := e.surjective
refine (cancel_right h).1 ?_
ext f p q m
simp only [e, rTensorHomEquivHomRTensor, dualTensorHomEquiv, compr₂_apply, mk_apply, coe_comp,
LinearEquiv.coe_toLinearMap, Function.comp_apply, map_tmul, LinearEquiv.coe_coe,
dualTensorHomEquivOfBasis_apply, LinearEquiv.trans_apply, congr_tmul,
dualTensorHomEquivOfBasis_symm_cancel_left, LinearEquiv.refl_apply, assoc_tmul,
dualTensorHom_apply, rTensorHomToHomRTensor_apply, smul_tmul']
variable {R M N P Q}
@[simp]
theorem lTensorHomEquivHomLTensor_apply (x : P ⊗[R] (M →ₗ[R] Q)) :
lTensorHomEquivHomLTensor R M P Q x = lTensorHomToHomLTensor R M P Q x := by
rw [← LinearEquiv.coe_toLinearMap, lTensorHomEquivHomLTensor_toLinearMap]
@[simp]
theorem rTensorHomEquivHomRTensor_apply (x : (M →ₗ[R] P) ⊗[R] Q) :
rTensorHomEquivHomRTensor R M P Q x = rTensorHomToHomRTensor R M P Q x := by
rw [← LinearEquiv.coe_toLinearMap, rTensorHomEquivHomRTensor_toLinearMap]
variable (R M N P Q)
/-- When `M` and `N` are free `R` modules, the map `homTensorHomMap` is an equivalence. Note that
`homTensorHomEquiv` is not defined directly in terms of `homTensorHomMap`, but the equivalence
between the two is given by `homTensorHomEquiv_toLinearMap` and `homTensorHomEquiv_apply`.
-/
noncomputable def homTensorHomEquiv : (M →ₗ[R] P) ⊗[R] (N →ₗ[R] Q) ≃ₗ[R] M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P ⊗[R] Q :=
rTensorHomEquivHomRTensor R M P _ ≪≫ₗ
(LinearEquiv.refl R M).arrowCongr (lTensorHomEquivHomLTensor R N _ Q) ≪≫ₗ
lift.equiv R M N _
@[simp]
theorem homTensorHomEquiv_toLinearMap :
(homTensorHomEquiv R M N P Q).toLinearMap = homTensorHomMap R M N P Q := by
ext m n
simp only [homTensorHomEquiv, compr₂_apply, mk_apply, LinearEquiv.coe_toLinearMap,
LinearEquiv.trans_apply, lift.equiv_apply, LinearEquiv.arrowCongr_apply, LinearEquiv.refl_symm,
LinearEquiv.refl_apply, rTensorHomEquivHomRTensor_apply, lTensorHomEquivHomLTensor_apply,
lTensorHomToHomLTensor_apply, rTensorHomToHomRTensor_apply, homTensorHomMap_apply,
map_tmul]
variable {R M N P Q}
@[simp]
theorem homTensorHomEquiv_apply (x : (M →ₗ[R] P) ⊗[R] (N →ₗ[R] Q)) :
homTensorHomEquiv R M N P Q x = homTensorHomMap R M N P Q x := by
rw [← LinearEquiv.coe_toLinearMap, homTensorHomEquiv_toLinearMap]
end CommRing
end HomTensorHom
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Contraction.lean | 301 | 308 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Linear
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Comp
/-!
# Additive operations on derivatives
For detailed documentation of the Fréchet derivative,
see the module docstring of `Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Basic.lean`.
This file contains the usual formulas (and existence assertions) for the derivative of
* sum of finitely many functions
* multiplication of a function by a scalar constant
* negative of a function
* subtraction of two functions
-/
open Filter Asymptotics ContinuousLinearMap
noncomputable section
section
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {f g : E → F}
variable {f' g' : E →L[𝕜] F}
variable {x : E}
variable {s : Set E}
variable {L : Filter E}
section ConstSMul
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [Module R F] [SMulCommClass 𝕜 R F] [ContinuousConstSMul R F]
/-! ### Derivative of a function multiplied by a constant -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.const_smul (h : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) (c : R) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => c • f x) (c • f') x :=
(c • (1 : F →L[𝕜] F)).hasStrictFDerivAt.comp x h
theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.const_smul (h : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L) (c : R) :
HasFDerivAtFilter (fun x => c • f x) (c • f') x L :=
(c • (1 : F →L[𝕜] F)).hasFDerivAtFilter.comp x h tendsto_map
@[fun_prop]
nonrec theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.const_smul (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (c : R) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x => c • f x) (c • f') s x :=
h.const_smul c
@[fun_prop]
nonrec theorem HasFDerivAt.const_smul (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (c : R) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x => c • f x) (c • f') x :=
h.const_smul c
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.const_smul (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (c : R) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => c • f y) s x :=
(h.hasFDerivWithinAt.const_smul c).differentiableWithinAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.const_smul (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) (c : R) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => c • f y) x :=
(h.hasFDerivAt.const_smul c).differentiableAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableOn.const_smul (h : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (c : R) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => c • f y) s := fun x hx => (h x hx).const_smul c
@[fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.const_smul (h : Differentiable 𝕜 f) (c : R) :
Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => c • f y := fun x => (h x).const_smul c
theorem fderivWithin_const_smul (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x)
(h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (c : R) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y => c • f y) s x = c • fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x :=
(h.hasFDerivWithinAt.const_smul c).fderivWithin hxs
/-- Version of `fderivWithin_const_smul` written with `c • f` instead of `fun y ↦ c • f y`. -/
theorem fderivWithin_const_smul' (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x)
(h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) (c : R) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (c • f) s x = c • fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x :=
fderivWithin_const_smul hxs h c
theorem fderiv_const_smul (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) (c : R) :
fderiv 𝕜 (fun y => c • f y) x = c • fderiv 𝕜 f x :=
(h.hasFDerivAt.const_smul c).fderiv
/-- Version of `fderiv_const_smul` written with `c • f` instead of `fun y ↦ c • f y`. -/
theorem fderiv_const_smul' (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) (c : R) :
fderiv 𝕜 (c • f) x = c • fderiv 𝕜 f x :=
(h.hasFDerivAt.const_smul c).fderiv
end ConstSMul
section Add
/-! ### Derivative of the sum of two functions -/
@[fun_prop]
nonrec theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.add (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x)
(hg : HasStrictFDerivAt g g' x) : HasStrictFDerivAt (fun y => f y + g y) (f' + g') x :=
.of_isLittleO <| (hf.isLittleO.add hg.isLittleO).congr_left fun y => by
simp only [LinearMap.sub_apply, LinearMap.add_apply, map_sub, map_add, add_apply]
abel
theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.add (hf : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L)
(hg : HasFDerivAtFilter g g' x L) : HasFDerivAtFilter (fun y => f y + g y) (f' + g') x L :=
.of_isLittleO <| (hf.isLittleO.add hg.isLittleO).congr_left fun _ => by
simp only [LinearMap.sub_apply, LinearMap.add_apply, map_sub, map_add, add_apply]
abel
@[fun_prop]
nonrec theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.add (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hg : HasFDerivWithinAt g g' s x) : HasFDerivWithinAt (fun y => f y + g y) (f' + g') s x :=
hf.add hg
@[fun_prop]
nonrec theorem HasFDerivAt.add (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasFDerivAt g g' x) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x => f x + g x) (f' + g') x :=
hf.add hg
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.add (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x)
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g s x) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => f y + g y) s x :=
(hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.add hg.hasFDerivWithinAt).differentiableWithinAt
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.add (hf : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => f y + g y) x :=
(hf.hasFDerivAt.add hg.hasFDerivAt).differentiableAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableOn.add (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (hg : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 g s) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => f y + g y) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).add (hg x hx)
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.add (hf : Differentiable 𝕜 f) (hg : Differentiable 𝕜 g) :
Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => f y + g y := fun x => (hf x).add (hg x)
theorem fderivWithin_add (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x)
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y => f y + g y) s x = fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x + fderivWithin 𝕜 g s x :=
(hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.add hg.hasFDerivWithinAt).fderivWithin hxs
/-- Version of `fderivWithin_add` where the function is written as `f + g` instead
of `fun y ↦ f y + g y`. -/
theorem fderivWithin_add' (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x)
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (f + g) s x = fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x + fderivWithin 𝕜 g s x :=
fderivWithin_add hxs hf hg
theorem fderiv_add (hf : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g x) :
fderiv 𝕜 (fun y => f y + g y) x = fderiv 𝕜 f x + fderiv 𝕜 g x :=
(hf.hasFDerivAt.add hg.hasFDerivAt).fderiv
/-- Version of `fderiv_add` where the function is written as `f + g` instead
of `fun y ↦ f y + g y`. -/
theorem fderiv_add' (hf : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g x) :
fderiv 𝕜 (f + g) x = fderiv 𝕜 f x + fderiv 𝕜 g x :=
fderiv_add hf hg
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_add_const_iff (c : F) :
HasFDerivAtFilter (f · + c) f' x L ↔ HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L := by
simp [hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleOTVS]
alias ⟨_, HasFDerivAtFilter.add_const⟩ := hasFDerivAtFilter_add_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_add_const_iff (c : F) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (f · + c) f' x ↔ HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x := by
simp [hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO]
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, HasStrictFDerivAt.add_const⟩ := hasStrictFDerivAt_add_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_add_const_iff (c : F) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (f · + c) f' s x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_add_const_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, HasFDerivWithinAt.add_const⟩ := hasFDerivWithinAt_add_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivAt_add_const_iff (c : F) : HasFDerivAt (f · + c) f' x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_add_const_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, HasFDerivAt.add_const⟩ := hasFDerivAt_add_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem differentiableWithinAt_add_const_iff (c : F) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => f y + c) s x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ hasFDerivWithinAt_add_const_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, DifferentiableWithinAt.add_const⟩ := differentiableWithinAt_add_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem differentiableAt_add_const_iff (c : F) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => f y + c) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ hasFDerivAt_add_const_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, DifferentiableAt.add_const⟩ := differentiableAt_add_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem differentiableOn_add_const_iff (c : F) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => f y + c) s ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s :=
forall₂_congr fun _ _ ↦ differentiableWithinAt_add_const_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, DifferentiableOn.add_const⟩ := differentiableOn_add_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem differentiable_add_const_iff (c : F) :
(Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => f y + c) ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f :=
forall_congr' fun _ ↦ differentiableAt_add_const_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, Differentiable.add_const⟩ := differentiable_add_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem fderivWithin_add_const (c : F) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y => f y + c) s x = fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x := by
classical simp [fderivWithin]
@[simp]
theorem fderiv_add_const (c : F) : fderiv 𝕜 (fun y => f y + c) x = fderiv 𝕜 f x := by
simp only [← fderivWithin_univ, fderivWithin_add_const]
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_const_add_iff (c : F) :
HasFDerivAtFilter (c + f ·) f' x L ↔ HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L := by
simpa only [add_comm] using hasFDerivAtFilter_add_const_iff c
alias ⟨_, HasFDerivAtFilter.const_add⟩ := hasFDerivAtFilter_const_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_const_add_iff (c : F) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (c + f ·) f' x ↔ HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x := by
simpa only [add_comm] using hasStrictFDerivAt_add_const_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, HasStrictFDerivAt.const_add⟩ := hasStrictFDerivAt_const_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_const_add_iff (c : F) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (c + f ·) f' s x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_const_add_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, HasFDerivWithinAt.const_add⟩ := hasFDerivWithinAt_const_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivAt_const_add_iff (c : F) : HasFDerivAt (c + f ·) f' x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_const_add_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, HasFDerivAt.const_add⟩ := hasFDerivAt_const_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem differentiableWithinAt_const_add_iff (c : F) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => c + f y) s x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ hasFDerivWithinAt_const_add_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, DifferentiableWithinAt.const_add⟩ := differentiableWithinAt_const_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem differentiableAt_const_add_iff (c : F) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => c + f y) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ hasFDerivAt_const_add_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, DifferentiableAt.const_add⟩ := differentiableAt_const_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem differentiableOn_const_add_iff (c : F) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => c + f y) s ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s :=
forall₂_congr fun _ _ ↦ differentiableWithinAt_const_add_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, DifferentiableOn.const_add⟩ := differentiableOn_const_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem differentiable_const_add_iff (c : F) :
(Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => c + f y) ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f :=
forall_congr' fun _ ↦ differentiableAt_const_add_iff c
@[fun_prop]
alias ⟨_, Differentiable.const_add⟩ := differentiable_const_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem fderivWithin_const_add (c : F) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y => c + f y) s x = fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x := by
simpa only [add_comm] using fderivWithin_add_const c
@[simp]
theorem fderiv_const_add (c : F) : fderiv 𝕜 (fun y => c + f y) x = fderiv 𝕜 f x := by
simp only [add_comm c, fderiv_add_const]
end Add
section Sum
/-! ### Derivative of a finite sum of functions -/
variable {ι : Type*} {u : Finset ι} {A : ι → E → F} {A' : ι → E →L[𝕜] F}
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, HasStrictFDerivAt (A i) (A' i) x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun y => ∑ i ∈ u, A i y) (∑ i ∈ u, A' i) x := by
simp only [hasStrictFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO] at *
convert IsLittleO.sum h
simp [Finset.sum_sub_distrib, ContinuousLinearMap.sum_apply]
theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, HasFDerivAtFilter (A i) (A' i) x L) :
HasFDerivAtFilter (fun y => ∑ i ∈ u, A i y) (∑ i ∈ u, A' i) x L := by
simp only [hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO] at *
convert IsLittleO.sum h
simp [ContinuousLinearMap.sum_apply]
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, HasFDerivWithinAt (A i) (A' i) s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun y => ∑ i ∈ u, A i y) (∑ i ∈ u, A' i) s x :=
HasFDerivAtFilter.sum h
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, HasFDerivAt (A i) (A' i) x) :
HasFDerivAt (fun y => ∑ i ∈ u, A i y) (∑ i ∈ u, A' i) x :=
HasFDerivAtFilter.sum h
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (A i) s x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => ∑ i ∈ u, A i y) s x :=
HasFDerivWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt <|
HasFDerivWithinAt.sum fun i hi => (h i hi).hasFDerivWithinAt
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (A i) x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => ∑ i ∈ u, A i y) x :=
HasFDerivAt.differentiableAt <| HasFDerivAt.sum fun i hi => (h i hi).hasFDerivAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableOn.sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (A i) s) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => ∑ i ∈ u, A i y) s := fun x hx =>
DifferentiableWithinAt.sum fun i hi => h i hi x hx
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, Differentiable 𝕜 (A i)) :
Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => ∑ i ∈ u, A i y := fun x => DifferentiableAt.sum fun i hi => h i hi x
theorem fderivWithin_sum (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x)
(h : ∀ i ∈ u, DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (A i) s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y => ∑ i ∈ u, A i y) s x = ∑ i ∈ u, fderivWithin 𝕜 (A i) s x :=
(HasFDerivWithinAt.sum fun i hi => (h i hi).hasFDerivWithinAt).fderivWithin hxs
theorem fderiv_sum (h : ∀ i ∈ u, DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (A i) x) :
fderiv 𝕜 (fun y => ∑ i ∈ u, A i y) x = ∑ i ∈ u, fderiv 𝕜 (A i) x :=
(HasFDerivAt.sum fun i hi => (h i hi).hasFDerivAt).fderiv
end Sum
section Neg
/-! ### Derivative of the negative of a function -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.neg (h : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => -f x) (-f') x :=
(-1 : F →L[𝕜] F).hasStrictFDerivAt.comp x h
theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.neg (h : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L) :
HasFDerivAtFilter (fun x => -f x) (-f') x L :=
(-1 : F →L[𝕜] F).hasFDerivAtFilter.comp x h tendsto_map
@[fun_prop]
nonrec theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.neg (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x => -f x) (-f') s x :=
h.neg
@[fun_prop]
nonrec theorem HasFDerivAt.neg (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) : HasFDerivAt (fun x => -f x) (-f') x :=
h.neg
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.neg (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => -f y) s x :=
h.hasFDerivWithinAt.neg.differentiableWithinAt
@[simp]
theorem differentiableWithinAt_neg_iff :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => -f y) s x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [neg_neg] using h.neg, fun h => h.neg⟩
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.neg (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => -f y) x :=
h.hasFDerivAt.neg.differentiableAt
@[simp]
theorem differentiableAt_neg_iff : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => -f y) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [neg_neg] using h.neg, fun h => h.neg⟩
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableOn.neg (h : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => -f y) s :=
fun x hx => (h x hx).neg
@[simp]
theorem differentiableOn_neg_iff : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => -f y) s ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [neg_neg] using h.neg, fun h => h.neg⟩
@[fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.neg (h : Differentiable 𝕜 f) : Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => -f y := fun x =>
(h x).neg
@[simp]
theorem differentiable_neg_iff : (Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => -f y) ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [neg_neg] using h.neg, fun h => h.neg⟩
theorem fderivWithin_neg (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y => -f y) s x = -fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x := by
classical
by_cases h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x
· exact h.hasFDerivWithinAt.neg.fderivWithin hxs
· rw [fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt h,
fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt, neg_zero]
simpa
/-- Version of `fderivWithin_neg` where the function is written `-f` instead of `fun y ↦ - f y`. -/
theorem fderivWithin_neg' (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (-f) s x = -fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x :=
fderivWithin_neg hxs
@[simp]
theorem fderiv_neg : fderiv 𝕜 (fun y => -f y) x = -fderiv 𝕜 f x := by
simp only [← fderivWithin_univ, fderivWithin_neg uniqueDiffWithinAt_univ]
/-- Version of `fderiv_neg` where the function is written `-f` instead of `fun y ↦ - f y`. -/
theorem fderiv_neg' : fderiv 𝕜 (-f) x = -fderiv 𝕜 f x :=
fderiv_neg
end Neg
section Sub
/-! ### Derivative of the difference of two functions -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.sub (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasStrictFDerivAt g g' x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => f x - g x) (f' - g') x := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add hg.neg
theorem HasFDerivAtFilter.sub (hf : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L) (hg : HasFDerivAtFilter g g' x L) :
HasFDerivAtFilter (fun x => f x - g x) (f' - g') x L := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add hg.neg
@[fun_prop]
nonrec theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.sub (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hg : HasFDerivWithinAt g g' s x) : HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x => f x - g x) (f' - g') s x :=
hf.sub hg
@[fun_prop]
nonrec theorem HasFDerivAt.sub (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasFDerivAt g g' x) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x => f x - g x) (f' - g') x :=
hf.sub hg
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.sub (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x)
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 g s x) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => f y - g y) s x :=
(hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.sub hg.hasFDerivWithinAt).differentiableWithinAt
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.sub (hf : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => f y - g y) x :=
(hf.hasFDerivAt.sub hg.hasFDerivAt).differentiableAt
@[simp]
lemma DifferentiableAt.add_iff_left (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => f y + g y) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun hf ↦ hf.add hg⟩
simpa only [add_sub_cancel_right] using h.sub hg
@[simp]
lemma DifferentiableAt.add_iff_right (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => f y + g y) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g x := by
simp only [add_comm (f _), hg.add_iff_left]
@[simp]
lemma DifferentiableAt.sub_iff_left (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => f y - g y) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, differentiableAt_neg_iff, hg, add_iff_left]
@[simp]
lemma DifferentiableAt.sub_iff_right (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => f y - g y) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g x := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, hg, add_iff_right, differentiableAt_neg_iff]
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableOn.sub (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (hg : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 g s) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => f y - g y) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).sub (hg x hx)
@[simp]
lemma DifferentiableOn.add_iff_left (hg : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 g s) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => f y + g y) s ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun hf ↦ hf.add hg⟩
simpa only [add_sub_cancel_right] using h.sub hg
@[simp]
lemma DifferentiableOn.add_iff_right (hg : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => f y + g y) s ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 g s := by
simp only [add_comm (f _), hg.add_iff_left]
@[simp]
lemma DifferentiableOn.sub_iff_left (hg : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 g s) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => f y - g y) s ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, differentiableOn_neg_iff, hg, add_iff_left]
@[simp]
lemma DifferentiableOn.sub_iff_right (hg : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => f y - g y) s ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 g s := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, differentiableOn_neg_iff, hg, add_iff_right]
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.sub (hf : Differentiable 𝕜 f) (hg : Differentiable 𝕜 g) :
Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => f y - g y := fun x => (hf x).sub (hg x)
@[simp]
lemma Differentiable.add_iff_left (hg : Differentiable 𝕜 g) :
Differentiable 𝕜 (fun y => f y + g y) ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun hf ↦ hf.add hg⟩
simpa only [add_sub_cancel_right] using h.sub hg
@[simp]
lemma Differentiable.add_iff_right (hg : Differentiable 𝕜 f) :
Differentiable 𝕜 (fun y => f y + g y) ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 g := by
simp only [add_comm (f _), hg.add_iff_left]
@[simp]
lemma Differentiable.sub_iff_left (hg : Differentiable 𝕜 g) :
Differentiable 𝕜 (fun y => f y - g y) ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, differentiable_neg_iff, hg, add_iff_left]
@[simp]
lemma Differentiable.sub_iff_right (hg : Differentiable 𝕜 f) :
Differentiable 𝕜 (fun y => f y - g y) ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 g := by
| simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, differentiable_neg_iff, hg, add_iff_right]
theorem fderivWithin_sub (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x)
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Add.lean | 561 | 563 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Adjoin.FG
/-!
# Adjoining elements and being finitely generated in an algebra tower
## Main results
* `Algebra.fg_trans'`: if `S` is finitely generated as `R`-algebra and `A` as `S`-algebra,
then `A` is finitely generated as `R`-algebra
* `fg_of_fg_of_fg`: **Artin--Tate lemma**: if C/B/A is a tower of rings, and A is noetherian, and
C is algebra-finite over A, and C is module-finite over B, then B is algebra-finite over A.
-/
open Pointwise
universe u v w u₁
variable (R : Type u) (S : Type v) (A : Type w) (B : Type u₁)
namespace Algebra
theorem adjoin_restrictScalars (C D E : Type*) [CommSemiring C] [CommSemiring D] [CommSemiring E]
[Algebra C D] [Algebra C E] [Algebra D E] [IsScalarTower C D E] (S : Set E) :
(Algebra.adjoin D S).restrictScalars C =
(Algebra.adjoin ((⊤ : Subalgebra C D).map (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom C D E)) S).restrictScalars
C := by
suffices
Set.range (algebraMap D E) =
Set.range (algebraMap ((⊤ : Subalgebra C D).map (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom C D E)) E) by
ext x
change x ∈ Subsemiring.closure (_ ∪ S) ↔ x ∈ Subsemiring.closure (_ ∪ S)
rw [this]
ext x
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
exact ⟨⟨algebraMap D E y, ⟨y, ⟨Algebra.mem_top, rfl⟩⟩⟩, hy⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨y, ⟨z, ⟨h0, h1⟩⟩⟩, h2⟩
exact ⟨z, Eq.trans h1 h2⟩
theorem adjoin_res_eq_adjoin_res (C D E F : Type*) [CommSemiring C] [CommSemiring D]
[CommSemiring E] [CommSemiring F] [Algebra C D] [Algebra C E] [Algebra C F] [Algebra D F]
[Algebra E F] [IsScalarTower C D F] [IsScalarTower C E F] {S : Set D} {T : Set E}
(hS : Algebra.adjoin C S = ⊤) (hT : Algebra.adjoin C T = ⊤) :
(Algebra.adjoin E (algebraMap D F '' S)).restrictScalars C =
(Algebra.adjoin D (algebraMap E F '' T)).restrictScalars C := by
rw [adjoin_restrictScalars C E, adjoin_restrictScalars C D, ← hS, ← hT, ← Algebra.adjoin_image,
← Algebra.adjoin_image, ← AlgHom.coe_toRingHom, ← AlgHom.coe_toRingHom,
IsScalarTower.coe_toAlgHom, IsScalarTower.coe_toAlgHom, ← adjoin_union_eq_adjoin_adjoin, ←
adjoin_union_eq_adjoin_adjoin, Set.union_comm]
end Algebra
section
theorem Algebra.fg_trans' {R S A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Semiring A]
[Algebra R S] [Algebra S A] [Algebra R A] [IsScalarTower R S A] (hRS : (⊤ : Subalgebra R S).FG)
(hSA : (⊤ : Subalgebra S A).FG) : (⊤ : Subalgebra R A).FG := by
classical
rcases hRS with ⟨s, hs⟩
rcases hSA with ⟨t, ht⟩
exact ⟨s.image (algebraMap S A) ∪ t, by
rw [Finset.coe_union, Finset.coe_image,
Algebra.adjoin_algebraMap_image_union_eq_adjoin_adjoin,
hs, Algebra.adjoin_top, ht, Subalgebra.restrictScalars_top,
Subalgebra.restrictScalars_top
]
⟩
end
section ArtinTate
variable (C : Type*)
section Semiring
variable [CommSemiring A] [CommSemiring B] [Semiring C]
variable [Algebra A B] [Algebra B C] [Algebra A C] [IsScalarTower A B C]
open Finset Submodule
theorem exists_subalgebra_of_fg (hAC : (⊤ : Subalgebra A C).FG) (hBC : (⊤ : Submodule B C).FG) :
∃ B₀ : Subalgebra A B, B₀.FG ∧ (⊤ : Submodule B₀ C).FG := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := hAC
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hBC
have := hy
| simp_rw [eq_top_iff', mem_span_finset] at this
choose f _ hf using this
classical
let s : Finset B := Finset.image₂ f (x ∪ y * y) y
have hxy :
∀ xi ∈ x, xi ∈ span (Algebra.adjoin A (↑s : Set B)) (↑(insert 1 y : Finset C) : Set C) :=
fun xi hxi =>
hf xi ▸
sum_mem fun yj hyj =>
smul_mem (span (Algebra.adjoin A (↑s : Set B)) (↑(insert 1 y : Finset C) : Set C))
⟨f xi yj, Algebra.subset_adjoin <| mem_image₂_of_mem (mem_union_left _ hxi) hyj⟩
(subset_span <| mem_insert_of_mem hyj)
have hyy :
span (Algebra.adjoin A (↑s : Set B)) (↑(insert 1 y : Finset C) : Set C) *
span (Algebra.adjoin A (↑s : Set B)) (↑(insert 1 y : Finset C) : Set C) ≤
span (Algebra.adjoin A (↑s : Set B)) (↑(insert 1 y : Finset C) : Set C) := by
rw [span_mul_span, span_le, coe_insert]
rintro _ ⟨yi, rfl | hyi, yj, rfl | hyj, rfl⟩ <;> dsimp
· rw [mul_one]
exact subset_span (Set.mem_insert _ _)
· rw [one_mul]
exact subset_span (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ hyj)
· rw [mul_one]
exact subset_span (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ hyi)
· rw [← hf (yi * yj)]
exact
SetLike.mem_coe.2
(sum_mem fun yk hyk =>
smul_mem (span (Algebra.adjoin A (↑s : Set B)) (insert 1 ↑y : Set C))
⟨f (yi * yj) yk,
Algebra.subset_adjoin <|
mem_image₂_of_mem (mem_union_right _ <| mul_mem_mul hyi hyj) hyk⟩
(subset_span <| Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ hyk : yk ∈ _))
refine ⟨Algebra.adjoin A (↑s : Set B), Subalgebra.fg_adjoin_finset _, insert 1 y, ?_⟩
convert restrictScalars_injective A (Algebra.adjoin A (s : Set B)) C _
rw [restrictScalars_top, eq_top_iff, ← Algebra.top_toSubmodule, ← hx, Algebra.adjoin_eq_span,
span_le]
refine fun r hr =>
Submonoid.closure_induction (fun c hc => hxy c hc) (subset_span <| mem_insert_self _ _)
(fun p q _ _ hp hq => hyy <| Submodule.mul_mem_mul hp hq) hr
end Semiring
section Ring
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Adjoin/Tower.lean | 92 | 135 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Exponential
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Family
/-!
# Cantor Normal Form
The Cantor normal form of an ordinal is generally defined as its base `ω` expansion, with its
non-zero exponents in decreasing order. Here, we more generally define a base `b` expansion
`Ordinal.CNF` in this manner, which is well-behaved for any `b ≥ 2`.
# Implementation notes
We implement `Ordinal.CNF` as an association list, where keys are exponents and values are
coefficients. This is because this structure intrinsically reflects two key properties of the Cantor
normal form:
- It is ordered.
- It has finitely many entries.
# Todo
- Add API for the coefficients of the Cantor normal form.
- Prove the basic results relating the CNF to the arithmetic operations on ordinals.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u
open List
namespace Ordinal
/-- Inducts on the base `b` expansion of an ordinal. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
noncomputable def CNFRec (b : Ordinal) {C : Ordinal → Sort*} (H0 : C 0)
(H : ∀ o, o ≠ 0 → C (o % b ^ log b o) → C o) (o : Ordinal) : C o :=
if h : o = 0 then h ▸ H0 else H o h (CNFRec b H0 H (o % b ^ log b o))
termination_by o
decreasing_by exact mod_opow_log_lt_self b h
@[simp]
theorem CNFRec_zero {C : Ordinal → Sort*} (b : Ordinal) (H0 : C 0)
(H : ∀ o, o ≠ 0 → C (o % b ^ log b o) → C o) : CNFRec b H0 H 0 = H0 := by
rw [CNFRec, dif_pos rfl]
theorem CNFRec_pos (b : Ordinal) {o : Ordinal} {C : Ordinal → Sort*} (ho : o ≠ 0) (H0 : C 0)
(H : ∀ o, o ≠ 0 → C (o % b ^ log b o) → C o) :
CNFRec b H0 H o = H o ho (@CNFRec b C H0 H _) := by
rw [CNFRec, dif_neg]
/-- The Cantor normal form of an ordinal `o` is the list of coefficients and exponents in the
base-`b` expansion of `o`.
We special-case `CNF 0 o = CNF 1 o = [(0, o)]` for `o ≠ 0`.
|
`CNF b (b ^ u₁ * v₁ + b ^ u₂ * v₂) = [(u₁, v₁), (u₂, v₂)]` -/
@[pp_nodot]
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/CantorNormalForm.lean | 62 | 64 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Lattice
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Coprime.Lemmas
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.NonUnitalSubsemiring.Basic
/-!
# More operations on modules and ideals
-/
assert_not_exists Basis -- See `RingTheory.Ideal.Basis`
Submodule.hasQuotient -- See `RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Operations`
universe u v w x
open Pointwise
namespace Submodule
lemma coe_span_smul {R' M' : Type*} [CommSemiring R'] [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R' M']
(s : Set R') (N : Submodule R' M') :
(Ideal.span s : Set R') • N = s • N :=
set_smul_eq_of_le _ _ _
(by rintro r n hr hn
induction hr using Submodule.span_induction with
| mem _ h => exact mem_set_smul_of_mem_mem h hn
| zero => rw [zero_smul]; exact Submodule.zero_mem _
| add _ _ _ _ ihr ihs => rw [add_smul]; exact Submodule.add_mem _ ihr ihs
| smul _ _ hr =>
rw [mem_span_set] at hr
obtain ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩ := hr
rw [Finsupp.sum, Finset.smul_sum, Finset.sum_smul]
refine Submodule.sum_mem _ fun i hi => ?_
rw [← mul_smul, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm, mul_smul]
exact mem_set_smul_of_mem_mem (hc hi) <| Submodule.smul_mem _ _ hn) <|
set_smul_mono_left _ Submodule.subset_span
lemma span_singleton_toAddSubgroup_eq_zmultiples (a : ℤ) :
(span ℤ {a}).toAddSubgroup = AddSubgroup.zmultiples a := by
ext i
simp [Ideal.mem_span_singleton', AddSubgroup.mem_zmultiples_iff]
@[simp] lemma _root_.Ideal.span_singleton_toAddSubgroup_eq_zmultiples (a : ℤ) :
(Ideal.span {a}).toAddSubgroup = AddSubgroup.zmultiples a :=
Submodule.span_singleton_toAddSubgroup_eq_zmultiples _
variable {R : Type u} {M : Type v} {M' F G : Type*}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
/-- This duplicates the global `smul_eq_mul`, but doesn't have to unfold anywhere near as much to
apply. -/
protected theorem _root_.Ideal.smul_eq_mul (I J : Ideal R) : I • J = I * J :=
rfl
variable {I J : Ideal R} {N : Submodule R M}
theorem smul_le_right : I • N ≤ N :=
smul_le.2 fun r _ _ ↦ N.smul_mem r
theorem map_le_smul_top (I : Ideal R) (f : R →ₗ[R] M) :
Submodule.map f I ≤ I • (⊤ : Submodule R M) := by
rintro _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
rw [← mul_one y, ← smul_eq_mul, f.map_smul]
exact smul_mem_smul hy mem_top
variable (I J N)
@[simp]
theorem top_smul : (⊤ : Ideal R) • N = N :=
le_antisymm smul_le_right fun r hri => one_smul R r ▸ smul_mem_smul mem_top hri
protected theorem mul_smul : (I * J) • N = I • J • N :=
Submodule.smul_assoc _ _ _
theorem mem_of_span_top_of_smul_mem (M' : Submodule R M) (s : Set R) (hs : Ideal.span s = ⊤) (x : M)
(H : ∀ r : s, (r : R) • x ∈ M') : x ∈ M' := by
suffices LinearMap.range (LinearMap.toSpanSingleton R M x) ≤ M' by
rw [← LinearMap.toSpanSingleton_one R M x]
exact this (LinearMap.mem_range_self _ 1)
rw [LinearMap.range_eq_map, ← hs, map_le_iff_le_comap, Ideal.span, span_le]
exact fun r hr ↦ H ⟨r, hr⟩
variable {M' : Type w} [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R M']
@[simp]
theorem map_smul'' (f : M →ₗ[R] M') : (I • N).map f = I • N.map f :=
le_antisymm
(map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <|
smul_le.2 fun r hr n hn =>
show f (r • n) ∈ I • N.map f from
(f.map_smul r n).symm ▸ smul_mem_smul hr (mem_map_of_mem hn)) <|
smul_le.2 fun r hr _ hn =>
let ⟨p, hp, hfp⟩ := mem_map.1 hn
hfp ▸ f.map_smul r p ▸ mem_map_of_mem (smul_mem_smul hr hp)
theorem mem_smul_top_iff (N : Submodule R M) (x : N) :
x ∈ I • (⊤ : Submodule R N) ↔ (x : M) ∈ I • N := by
have : Submodule.map N.subtype (I • ⊤) = I • N := by
rw [Submodule.map_smul'', Submodule.map_top, Submodule.range_subtype]
simp [← this, -map_smul'']
@[simp]
theorem smul_comap_le_comap_smul (f : M →ₗ[R] M') (S : Submodule R M') (I : Ideal R) :
I • S.comap f ≤ (I • S).comap f := by
refine Submodule.smul_le.mpr fun r hr x hx => ?_
rw [Submodule.mem_comap] at hx ⊢
rw [f.map_smul]
exact Submodule.smul_mem_smul hr hx
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R M']
open Pointwise
theorem mem_smul_span_singleton {I : Ideal R} {m : M} {x : M} :
x ∈ I • span R ({m} : Set M) ↔ ∃ y ∈ I, y • m = x :=
⟨fun hx =>
smul_induction_on hx
(fun r hri _ hnm =>
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := mem_span_singleton.1 hnm
⟨r * s, I.mul_mem_right _ hri, hs ▸ mul_smul r s m⟩)
fun m1 m2 ⟨y1, hyi1, hy1⟩ ⟨y2, hyi2, hy2⟩ =>
⟨y1 + y2, I.add_mem hyi1 hyi2, by rw [add_smul, hy1, hy2]⟩,
fun ⟨_, hyi, hy⟩ => hy ▸ smul_mem_smul hyi (subset_span <| Set.mem_singleton m)⟩
variable {I J : Ideal R} {N P : Submodule R M}
variable (S : Set R) (T : Set M)
theorem smul_eq_map₂ : I • N = Submodule.map₂ (LinearMap.lsmul R M) I N :=
le_antisymm (smul_le.mpr fun _m hm _n ↦ Submodule.apply_mem_map₂ _ hm)
(map₂_le.mpr fun _m hm _n ↦ smul_mem_smul hm)
theorem span_smul_span : Ideal.span S • span R T = span R (⋃ (s ∈ S) (t ∈ T), {s • t}) := by
rw [smul_eq_map₂]
exact (map₂_span_span _ _ _ _).trans <| congr_arg _ <| Set.image2_eq_iUnion _ _ _
theorem ideal_span_singleton_smul (r : R) (N : Submodule R M) :
(Ideal.span {r} : Ideal R) • N = r • N := by
have : span R (⋃ (t : M) (_ : t ∈ N), {r • t}) = r • N := by
convert span_eq (r • N)
exact (Set.image_eq_iUnion _ (N : Set M)).symm
conv_lhs => rw [← span_eq N, span_smul_span]
simpa
/-- Given `s`, a generating set of `R`, to check that an `x : M` falls in a
submodule `M'` of `x`, we only need to show that `r ^ n • x ∈ M'` for some `n` for each `r : s`. -/
theorem mem_of_span_eq_top_of_smul_pow_mem (M' : Submodule R M) (s : Set R) (hs : Ideal.span s = ⊤)
(x : M) (H : ∀ r : s, ∃ n : ℕ, ((r : R) ^ n : R) • x ∈ M') : x ∈ M' := by
choose f hf using H
apply M'.mem_of_span_top_of_smul_mem _ (Ideal.span_range_pow_eq_top s hs f)
rintro ⟨_, r, hr, rfl⟩
exact hf r
open Pointwise in
@[simp]
theorem map_pointwise_smul (r : R) (N : Submodule R M) (f : M →ₗ[R] M') :
(r • N).map f = r • N.map f := by
simp_rw [← ideal_span_singleton_smul, map_smul'']
theorem mem_smul_span {s : Set M} {x : M} :
x ∈ I • Submodule.span R s ↔ x ∈ Submodule.span R (⋃ (a ∈ I) (b ∈ s), ({a • b} : Set M)) := by
rw [← I.span_eq, Submodule.span_smul_span, I.span_eq]
simp
variable (I)
/-- If `x` is an `I`-multiple of the submodule spanned by `f '' s`,
then we can write `x` as an `I`-linear combination of the elements of `f '' s`. -/
theorem mem_ideal_smul_span_iff_exists_sum {ι : Type*} (f : ι → M) (x : M) :
x ∈ I • span R (Set.range f) ↔
∃ (a : ι →₀ R) (_ : ∀ i, a i ∈ I), (a.sum fun i c => c • f i) = x := by
constructor; swap
· rintro ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact Submodule.sum_mem _ fun c _ => smul_mem_smul (ha c) <| subset_span <| Set.mem_range_self _
refine fun hx => span_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ (mem_smul_span.mp hx)
· simp only [Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_range, Set.mem_singleton_iff]
rintro x ⟨y, hy, x, ⟨i, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
refine ⟨Finsupp.single i y, fun j => ?_, ?_⟩
· letI := Classical.decEq ι
rw [Finsupp.single_apply]
split_ifs
· assumption
· exact I.zero_mem
refine @Finsupp.sum_single_index ι R M _ _ i _ (fun i y => y • f i) ?_
simp
· exact ⟨0, fun _ => I.zero_mem, Finsupp.sum_zero_index⟩
· rintro x y - - ⟨ax, hax, rfl⟩ ⟨ay, hay, rfl⟩
refine ⟨ax + ay, fun i => I.add_mem (hax i) (hay i), Finsupp.sum_add_index' ?_ ?_⟩ <;>
intros <;> simp only [zero_smul, add_smul]
· rintro c x - ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
refine ⟨c • a, fun i => I.mul_mem_left c (ha i), ?_⟩
rw [Finsupp.sum_smul_index, Finsupp.smul_sum] <;> intros <;> simp only [zero_smul, mul_smul]
theorem mem_ideal_smul_span_iff_exists_sum' {ι : Type*} (s : Set ι) (f : ι → M) (x : M) :
x ∈ I • span R (f '' s) ↔
∃ (a : s →₀ R) (_ : ∀ i, a i ∈ I), (a.sum fun i c => c • f i) = x := by
rw [← Submodule.mem_ideal_smul_span_iff_exists_sum, ← Set.image_eq_range]
end CommSemiring
end Submodule
namespace Ideal
section Add
variable {R : Type u} [Semiring R]
@[simp]
theorem add_eq_sup {I J : Ideal R} : I + J = I ⊔ J :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_eq_bot : (0 : Ideal R) = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sum_eq_sup {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Ideal R) : s.sum f = s.sup f :=
rfl
end Add
section Semiring
variable {R : Type u} [Semiring R] {I J K L : Ideal R}
@[simp]
theorem one_eq_top : (1 : Ideal R) = ⊤ := by
rw [Submodule.one_eq_span, ← Ideal.span, Ideal.span_singleton_one]
theorem add_eq_one_iff : I + J = 1 ↔ ∃ i ∈ I, ∃ j ∈ J, i + j = 1 := by
rw [one_eq_top, eq_top_iff_one, add_eq_sup, Submodule.mem_sup]
theorem mul_mem_mul {r s} (hr : r ∈ I) (hs : s ∈ J) : r * s ∈ I * J :=
Submodule.smul_mem_smul hr hs
theorem pow_mem_pow {x : R} (hx : x ∈ I) (n : ℕ) : x ^ n ∈ I ^ n :=
Submodule.pow_mem_pow _ hx _
theorem mul_le : I * J ≤ K ↔ ∀ r ∈ I, ∀ s ∈ J, r * s ∈ K :=
Submodule.smul_le
theorem mul_le_left : I * J ≤ J :=
mul_le.2 fun _ _ _ => J.mul_mem_left _
@[simp]
theorem sup_mul_left_self : I ⊔ J * I = I :=
sup_eq_left.2 mul_le_left
@[simp]
theorem mul_left_self_sup : J * I ⊔ I = I :=
sup_eq_right.2 mul_le_left
theorem mul_le_right [I.IsTwoSided] : I * J ≤ I :=
mul_le.2 fun _ hr _ _ ↦ I.mul_mem_right _ hr
@[simp]
theorem sup_mul_right_self [I.IsTwoSided] : I ⊔ I * J = I :=
sup_eq_left.2 mul_le_right
@[simp]
theorem mul_right_self_sup [I.IsTwoSided] : I * J ⊔ I = I :=
sup_eq_right.2 mul_le_right
protected theorem mul_assoc : I * J * K = I * (J * K) :=
Submodule.smul_assoc I J K
variable (I)
theorem mul_bot : I * ⊥ = ⊥ := by simp
theorem bot_mul : ⊥ * I = ⊥ := by simp
@[simp]
theorem top_mul : ⊤ * I = I :=
Submodule.top_smul I
variable {I}
theorem mul_mono (hik : I ≤ K) (hjl : J ≤ L) : I * J ≤ K * L :=
Submodule.smul_mono hik hjl
theorem mul_mono_left (h : I ≤ J) : I * K ≤ J * K :=
Submodule.smul_mono_left h
theorem mul_mono_right (h : J ≤ K) : I * J ≤ I * K :=
smul_mono_right I h
variable (I J K)
theorem mul_sup : I * (J ⊔ K) = I * J ⊔ I * K :=
Submodule.smul_sup I J K
theorem sup_mul : (I ⊔ J) * K = I * K ⊔ J * K :=
Submodule.sup_smul I J K
variable {I J K}
theorem pow_le_pow_right {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : I ^ n ≤ I ^ m := by
obtain _ | m := m
· rw [Submodule.pow_zero, one_eq_top]; exact le_top
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le h
rw [add_comm, Submodule.pow_add _ m.add_one_ne_zero]
exact mul_le_left
theorem pow_le_self {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : I ^ n ≤ I :=
calc
I ^ n ≤ I ^ 1 := pow_le_pow_right (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn)
_ = I := Submodule.pow_one _
theorem pow_right_mono (e : I ≤ J) (n : ℕ) : I ^ n ≤ J ^ n := by
induction' n with _ hn
· rw [Submodule.pow_zero, Submodule.pow_zero]
· rw [Submodule.pow_succ, Submodule.pow_succ]
exact Ideal.mul_mono hn e
namespace IsTwoSided
instance (priority := low) [J.IsTwoSided] : (I * J).IsTwoSided :=
⟨fun b ha ↦ Submodule.mul_induction_on ha
(fun i hi j hj ↦ by rw [mul_assoc]; exact mul_mem_mul hi (mul_mem_right _ _ hj))
fun x y hx hy ↦ by rw [right_distrib]; exact add_mem hx hy⟩
variable [I.IsTwoSided] (m n : ℕ)
instance (priority := low) : (I ^ n).IsTwoSided :=
n.rec
| (by rw [Submodule.pow_zero, one_eq_top]; infer_instance)
(fun _ _ ↦ by rw [Submodule.pow_succ]; infer_instance)
protected theorem mul_one : I * 1 = I :=
mul_le_right.antisymm
fun i hi ↦ mul_one i ▸ mul_mem_mul hi (one_eq_top (R := R) ▸ Submodule.mem_top)
protected theorem pow_add : I ^ (m + n) = I ^ m * I ^ n := by
obtain rfl | h := eq_or_ne n 0
· rw [add_zero, Submodule.pow_zero, IsTwoSided.mul_one]
· exact Submodule.pow_add _ h
protected theorem pow_succ : I ^ (n + 1) = I * I ^ n := by
rw [add_comm, IsTwoSided.pow_add, Submodule.pow_one]
end IsTwoSided
@[simp]
theorem mul_eq_bot [NoZeroDivisors R] : I * J = ⊥ ↔ I = ⊥ ∨ J = ⊥ :=
⟨fun hij =>
or_iff_not_imp_left.mpr fun I_ne_bot =>
J.eq_bot_iff.mpr fun j hj =>
let ⟨i, hi, ne0⟩ := I.ne_bot_iff.mp I_ne_bot
Or.resolve_left (mul_eq_zero.mp ((I * J).eq_bot_iff.mp hij _ (mul_mem_mul hi hj))) ne0,
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Ideal/Operations.lean | 340 | 363 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Batteries.Data.List.Perm
import Mathlib.Data.List.OfFn
import Mathlib.Data.List.Nodup
import Mathlib.Data.List.TakeWhile
import Mathlib.Order.Fin.Basic
/-!
# Sorting algorithms on lists
In this file we define `List.Sorted r l` to be an alias for `List.Pairwise r l`.
This alias is preferred in the case that `r` is a `<` or `≤`-like relation.
Then we define the sorting algorithm
`List.insertionSort` and prove its correctness.
-/
open List.Perm
universe u v
namespace List
/-!
### The predicate `List.Sorted`
-/
section Sorted
variable {α : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α}
/-- `Sorted r l` is the same as `List.Pairwise r l`, preferred in the case that `r`
is a `<` or `≤`-like relation (transitive and antisymmetric or asymmetric) -/
def Sorted :=
@Pairwise
instance decidableSorted [DecidableRel r] (l : List α) : Decidable (Sorted r l) :=
List.instDecidablePairwise _
protected theorem Sorted.le_of_lt [Preorder α] {l : List α} (h : l.Sorted (· < ·)) :
l.Sorted (· ≤ ·) :=
h.imp le_of_lt
protected theorem Sorted.lt_of_le [PartialOrder α] {l : List α} (h₁ : l.Sorted (· ≤ ·))
(h₂ : l.Nodup) : l.Sorted (· < ·) :=
h₁.imp₂ (fun _ _ => lt_of_le_of_ne) h₂
protected theorem Sorted.ge_of_gt [Preorder α] {l : List α} (h : l.Sorted (· > ·)) :
l.Sorted (· ≥ ·) :=
h.imp le_of_lt
protected theorem Sorted.gt_of_ge [PartialOrder α] {l : List α} (h₁ : l.Sorted (· ≥ ·))
(h₂ : l.Nodup) : l.Sorted (· > ·) :=
h₁.imp₂ (fun _ _ => lt_of_le_of_ne) <| by simp_rw [ne_comm]; exact h₂
@[simp]
theorem sorted_nil : Sorted r [] :=
Pairwise.nil
theorem Sorted.of_cons : Sorted r (a :: l) → Sorted r l :=
Pairwise.of_cons
theorem Sorted.tail {r : α → α → Prop} {l : List α} (h : Sorted r l) : Sorted r l.tail :=
Pairwise.tail h
theorem rel_of_sorted_cons {a : α} {l : List α} : Sorted r (a :: l) → ∀ b ∈ l, r a b :=
rel_of_pairwise_cons
nonrec theorem Sorted.cons {r : α → α → Prop} [IsTrans α r] {l : List α} {a b : α}
(hab : r a b) (h : Sorted r (b :: l)) : Sorted r (a :: b :: l) :=
h.cons <| forall_mem_cons.2 ⟨hab, fun _ hx => _root_.trans hab <| rel_of_sorted_cons h _ hx⟩
theorem sorted_cons_cons {r : α → α → Prop} [IsTrans α r] {l : List α} {a b : α} :
Sorted r (b :: a :: l) ↔ r b a ∧ Sorted r (a :: l) := by
constructor
· intro h
exact ⟨rel_of_sorted_cons h _ mem_cons_self, h.of_cons⟩
· rintro ⟨h, ha⟩
exact ha.cons h
theorem Sorted.head!_le [Inhabited α] [Preorder α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : Sorted (· < ·) l)
(ha : a ∈ l) : l.head! ≤ a := by
rw [← List.cons_head!_tail (List.ne_nil_of_mem ha)] at h ha
cases ha
· exact le_rfl
· exact le_of_lt (rel_of_sorted_cons h a (by assumption))
theorem Sorted.le_head! [Inhabited α] [Preorder α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : Sorted (· > ·) l)
(ha : a ∈ l) : a ≤ l.head! := by
rw [← List.cons_head!_tail (List.ne_nil_of_mem ha)] at h ha
cases ha
· exact le_rfl
· exact le_of_lt (rel_of_sorted_cons h a (by assumption))
@[simp]
theorem sorted_cons {a : α} {l : List α} : Sorted r (a :: l) ↔ (∀ b ∈ l, r a b) ∧ Sorted r l :=
pairwise_cons
protected theorem Sorted.nodup {r : α → α → Prop} [IsIrrefl α r] {l : List α} (h : Sorted r l) :
Nodup l :=
Pairwise.nodup h
protected theorem Sorted.filter {l : List α} (f : α → Bool) (h : Sorted r l) :
Sorted r (filter f l) :=
h.sublist filter_sublist
theorem eq_of_perm_of_sorted [IsAntisymm α r] {l₁ l₂ : List α} (hp : l₁ ~ l₂) (hs₁ : Sorted r l₁)
(hs₂ : Sorted r l₂) : l₁ = l₂ := by
induction hs₁ generalizing l₂ with
| nil => exact hp.nil_eq
| @cons a l₁ h₁ hs₁ IH =>
have : a ∈ l₂ := hp.subset mem_cons_self
rcases append_of_mem this with ⟨u₂, v₂, rfl⟩
have hp' := (perm_cons a).1 (hp.trans perm_middle)
obtain rfl := IH hp' (hs₂.sublist <| by simp)
change a :: u₂ ++ v₂ = u₂ ++ ([a] ++ v₂)
rw [← append_assoc]
congr
have : ∀ x ∈ u₂, x = a := fun x m =>
antisymm ((pairwise_append.1 hs₂).2.2 _ m a mem_cons_self) (h₁ _ (by simp [m]))
rw [(@eq_replicate_iff _ a (length u₂ + 1) (a :: u₂)).2,
(@eq_replicate_iff _ a (length u₂ + 1) (u₂ ++ [a])).2] <;>
constructor <;>
simp [iff_true_intro this, or_comm]
theorem Sorted.eq_of_mem_iff [IsAntisymm α r] [IsIrrefl α r] {l₁ l₂ : List α}
(h₁ : Sorted r l₁) (h₂ : Sorted r l₂) (h : ∀ a : α, a ∈ l₁ ↔ a ∈ l₂) : l₁ = l₂ :=
eq_of_perm_of_sorted ((perm_ext_iff_of_nodup h₁.nodup h₂.nodup).2 h) h₁ h₂
theorem sublist_of_subperm_of_sorted [IsAntisymm α r] {l₁ l₂ : List α} (hp : l₁ <+~ l₂)
(hs₁ : l₁.Sorted r) (hs₂ : l₂.Sorted r) : l₁ <+ l₂ := by
let ⟨_, h, h'⟩ := hp
rwa [← eq_of_perm_of_sorted h (hs₂.sublist h') hs₁]
@[simp 1100] -- Higher priority shortcut lemma.
theorem sorted_singleton (a : α) : Sorted r [a] := by
simp
theorem sorted_lt_range (n : ℕ) : Sorted (· < ·) (range n) := by
rw [Sorted, pairwise_iff_get]
simp
theorem sorted_replicate (n : ℕ) (a : α) : Sorted r (replicate n a) ↔ n ≤ 1 ∨ r a a :=
pairwise_replicate
theorem sorted_le_replicate (n : ℕ) (a : α) [Preorder α] : Sorted (· ≤ ·) (replicate n a) := by
simp [sorted_replicate]
theorem sorted_le_range (n : ℕ) : Sorted (· ≤ ·) (range n) :=
(sorted_lt_range n).le_of_lt
lemma sorted_lt_range' (a b) {s} (hs : s ≠ 0) :
Sorted (· < ·) (range' a b s) := by
induction b generalizing a with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
rw [List.range'_succ]
refine List.sorted_cons.mpr ⟨fun b hb ↦ ?_, @ih (a + s)⟩
exact lt_of_lt_of_le (Nat.lt_add_of_pos_right (Nat.zero_lt_of_ne_zero hs))
(List.left_le_of_mem_range' hb)
lemma sorted_le_range' (a b s) :
Sorted (· ≤ ·) (range' a b s) := by
by_cases hs : s ≠ 0
· exact (sorted_lt_range' a b hs).le_of_lt
· rw [ne_eq, Decidable.not_not] at hs
simpa [hs] using sorted_le_replicate b a
theorem Sorted.rel_get_of_lt {l : List α} (h : l.Sorted r) {a b : Fin l.length} (hab : a < b) :
r (l.get a) (l.get b) :=
List.pairwise_iff_get.1 h _ _ hab
theorem Sorted.rel_get_of_le [IsRefl α r] {l : List α} (h : l.Sorted r) {a b : Fin l.length}
(hab : a ≤ b) : r (l.get a) (l.get b) := by
obtain rfl | hlt := Fin.eq_or_lt_of_le hab; exacts [refl _, h.rel_get_of_lt hlt]
theorem Sorted.rel_of_mem_take_of_mem_drop {l : List α} (h : List.Sorted r l) {k : ℕ} {x y : α}
(hx : x ∈ List.take k l) (hy : y ∈ List.drop k l) : r x y := by
obtain ⟨iy, hiy, rfl⟩ := getElem_of_mem hy
obtain ⟨ix, hix, rfl⟩ := getElem_of_mem hx
rw [getElem_take, getElem_drop]
rw [length_take] at hix
exact h.rel_get_of_lt (Nat.lt_add_right _ (Nat.lt_min.mp hix).left)
/--
If a list is sorted with respect to a decidable relation,
then it is sorted with respect to the corresponding Bool-valued relation.
-/
theorem Sorted.decide [DecidableRel r] (l : List α) (h : Sorted r l) :
Sorted (fun a b => decide (r a b) = true) l := by
refine h.imp fun {a b} h => by simpa using h
end Sorted
section Monotone
variable {n : ℕ} {α : Type u} {f : Fin n → α}
open scoped Relator in
theorem sorted_ofFn_iff {r : α → α → Prop} : (ofFn f).Sorted r ↔ ((· < ·) ⇒ r) f f := by
simp_rw [Sorted, pairwise_iff_get, get_ofFn, Relator.LiftFun]
exact Iff.symm (Fin.rightInverse_cast _).surjective.forall₂
variable [Preorder α]
/-- The list `List.ofFn f` is strictly sorted with respect to `(· ≤ ·)` if and only if `f` is
strictly monotone. -/
@[simp] theorem sorted_lt_ofFn_iff : (ofFn f).Sorted (· < ·) ↔ StrictMono f := sorted_ofFn_iff
/-- The list `List.ofFn f` is strictly sorted with respect to `(· ≥ ·)` if and only if `f` is
strictly antitone. -/
@[simp] theorem sorted_gt_ofFn_iff : (ofFn f).Sorted (· > ·) ↔ StrictAnti f := sorted_ofFn_iff
/-- The list `List.ofFn f` is sorted with respect to `(· ≤ ·)` if and only if `f` is monotone. -/
@[simp] theorem sorted_le_ofFn_iff : (ofFn f).Sorted (· ≤ ·) ↔ Monotone f :=
sorted_ofFn_iff.trans monotone_iff_forall_lt.symm
/-- The list obtained from a monotone tuple is sorted. -/
alias ⟨_, _root_.Monotone.ofFn_sorted⟩ := sorted_le_ofFn_iff
/-- The list `List.ofFn f` is sorted with respect to `(· ≥ ·)` if and only if `f` is antitone. -/
@[simp] theorem sorted_ge_ofFn_iff : (ofFn f).Sorted (· ≥ ·) ↔ Antitone f :=
sorted_ofFn_iff.trans antitone_iff_forall_lt.symm
/-- The list obtained from an antitone tuple is sorted. -/
alias ⟨_, _root_.Antitone.ofFn_sorted⟩ := sorted_ge_ofFn_iff
end Monotone
lemma Sorted.filterMap {α β : Type*} {p : α → Option β} {l : List α}
{r : α → α → Prop} {r' : β → β → Prop} (hl : l.Sorted r)
(hp : ∀ (a b : α) (c d : β), p a = some c → p b = some d → r a b → r' c d) :
(l.filterMap p).Sorted r' := by
induction l with
| nil => simp
| cons a l ih =>
rw [List.filterMap_cons]
cases ha : p a with
| none =>
exact ih (List.sorted_cons.mp hl).right
| some b =>
rw [List.sorted_cons]
refine ⟨fun x hx ↦ ?_, ih (List.sorted_cons.mp hl).right⟩
obtain ⟨u, hu, hu'⟩ := List.mem_filterMap.mp hx
exact hp a u b x ha hu' <| (List.sorted_cons.mp hl).left u hu
end List
open List
namespace RelEmbedding
variable {α β : Type*} {ra : α → α → Prop} {rb : β → β → Prop}
@[simp]
theorem sorted_listMap (e : ra ↪r rb) {l : List α} : (l.map e).Sorted rb ↔ l.Sorted ra := by
simp [Sorted, pairwise_map, e.map_rel_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sorted_swap_listMap (e : ra ↪r rb) {l : List α} :
(l.map e).Sorted (Function.swap rb) ↔ l.Sorted (Function.swap ra) := by
simp [Sorted, pairwise_map, e.map_rel_iff]
end RelEmbedding
namespace OrderEmbedding
variable {α β : Type*} [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
@[simp]
theorem sorted_lt_listMap (e : α ↪o β) {l : List α} :
(l.map e).Sorted (· < ·) ↔ l.Sorted (· < ·) :=
e.ltEmbedding.sorted_listMap
@[simp]
theorem sorted_gt_listMap (e : α ↪o β) {l : List α} :
(l.map e).Sorted (· > ·) ↔ l.Sorted (· > ·) :=
e.ltEmbedding.sorted_swap_listMap
end OrderEmbedding
namespace RelIso
variable {α β : Type*} {ra : α → α → Prop} {rb : β → β → Prop}
@[simp]
theorem sorted_listMap (e : ra ≃r rb) {l : List α} : (l.map e).Sorted rb ↔ l.Sorted ra :=
e.toRelEmbedding.sorted_listMap
@[simp]
theorem sorted_swap_listMap (e : ra ≃r rb) {l : List α} :
(l.map e).Sorted (Function.swap rb) ↔ l.Sorted (Function.swap ra) :=
e.toRelEmbedding.sorted_swap_listMap
end RelIso
namespace OrderIso
variable {α β : Type*} [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
@[simp]
theorem sorted_lt_listMap (e : α ≃o β) {l : List α} :
(l.map e).Sorted (· < ·) ↔ l.Sorted (· < ·) :=
e.toOrderEmbedding.sorted_lt_listMap
@[simp]
theorem sorted_gt_listMap (e : α ≃o β) {l : List α} :
(l.map e).Sorted (· > ·) ↔ l.Sorted (· > ·) :=
e.toOrderEmbedding.sorted_gt_listMap
end OrderIso
namespace StrictMono
variable {α β : Type*} [LinearOrder α] [Preorder β] {f : α → β} {l : List α}
theorem sorted_le_listMap (hf : StrictMono f) :
(l.map f).Sorted (· ≤ ·) ↔ l.Sorted (· ≤ ·) :=
(OrderEmbedding.ofStrictMono f hf).sorted_listMap
theorem sorted_ge_listMap (hf : StrictMono f) :
(l.map f).Sorted (· ≥ ·) ↔ l.Sorted (· ≥ ·) :=
(OrderEmbedding.ofStrictMono f hf).sorted_swap_listMap
theorem sorted_lt_listMap (hf : StrictMono f) :
(l.map f).Sorted (· < ·) ↔ l.Sorted (· < ·) :=
(OrderEmbedding.ofStrictMono f hf).sorted_lt_listMap
theorem sorted_gt_listMap (hf : StrictMono f) :
(l.map f).Sorted (· > ·) ↔ l.Sorted (· > ·) :=
(OrderEmbedding.ofStrictMono f hf).sorted_gt_listMap
end StrictMono
namespace StrictAnti
variable {α β : Type*} [LinearOrder α] [Preorder β] {f : α → β} {l : List α}
theorem sorted_le_listMap (hf : StrictAnti f) :
(l.map f).Sorted (· ≤ ·) ↔ l.Sorted (· ≥ ·) :=
hf.dual_right.sorted_ge_listMap
theorem sorted_ge_listMap (hf : StrictAnti f) :
(l.map f).Sorted (· ≥ ·) ↔ l.Sorted (· ≤ ·) :=
hf.dual_right.sorted_le_listMap
theorem sorted_lt_listMap (hf : StrictAnti f) :
(l.map f).Sorted (· < ·) ↔ l.Sorted (· > ·) :=
hf.dual_right.sorted_gt_listMap
theorem sorted_gt_listMap (hf : StrictAnti f) :
(l.map f).Sorted (· > ·) ↔ l.Sorted (· < ·) :=
hf.dual_right.sorted_lt_listMap
end StrictAnti
namespace List
section sort
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop)
variable [DecidableRel r] [DecidableRel s]
local infixl:50 " ≼ " => r
local infixl:50 " ≼ " => s
/-! ### Insertion sort -/
section InsertionSort
/-- `orderedInsert a l` inserts `a` into `l` at such that
`orderedInsert a l` is sorted if `l` is. -/
@[simp]
def orderedInsert (a : α) : List α → List α
| [] => [a]
| b :: l => if a ≼ b then a :: b :: l else b :: orderedInsert a l
theorem orderedInsert_of_le {a b : α} (l : List α) (h : a ≼ b) :
orderedInsert r a (b :: l) = a :: b :: l :=
dif_pos h
/-- `insertionSort l` returns `l` sorted using the insertion sort algorithm. -/
@[simp]
def insertionSort : List α → List α
| [] => []
| b :: l => orderedInsert r b (insertionSort l)
-- A quick check that insertionSort is stable:
example :
insertionSort (fun m n => m / 10 ≤ n / 10) [5, 27, 221, 95, 17, 43, 7, 2, 98, 567, 23, 12] =
[5, 7, 2, 17, 12, 27, 23, 43, 95, 98, 221, 567] := rfl
@[simp]
theorem orderedInsert_nil (a : α) : [].orderedInsert r a = [a] :=
rfl
theorem orderedInsert_length : ∀ (L : List α) (a : α), (L.orderedInsert r a).length = L.length + 1
| [], _ => rfl
| hd :: tl, a => by
dsimp [orderedInsert]
split_ifs <;> simp [orderedInsert_length tl]
/-- An alternative definition of `orderedInsert` using `takeWhile` and `dropWhile`. -/
theorem orderedInsert_eq_take_drop (a : α) :
∀ l : List α,
l.orderedInsert r a = (l.takeWhile fun b => ¬a ≼ b) ++ a :: l.dropWhile fun b => ¬a ≼ b
| [] => rfl
| b :: l => by
dsimp only [orderedInsert]
split_ifs with h <;> simp [takeWhile, dropWhile, *, orderedInsert_eq_take_drop a l]
theorem insertionSort_cons_eq_take_drop (a : α) (l : List α) :
insertionSort r (a :: l) =
((insertionSort r l).takeWhile fun b => ¬a ≼ b) ++
| a :: (insertionSort r l).dropWhile fun b => ¬a ≼ b :=
orderedInsert_eq_take_drop r a _
@[simp]
theorem mem_orderedInsert {a b : α} {l : List α} :
a ∈ orderedInsert r b l ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ l :=
| Mathlib/Data/List/Sort.lean | 419 | 424 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jean Lo. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jean Lo, Bhavik Mehta, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Hull
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Module.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Absorbs
/-!
# Local convexity
This file defines absorbent and balanced sets.
An absorbent set is one that "surrounds" the origin. The idea is made precise by requiring that any
point belongs to all large enough scalings of the set. This is the vector world analog of a
topological neighborhood of the origin.
A balanced set is one that is everywhere around the origin. This means that `a • s ⊆ s` for all `a`
of norm less than `1`.
## Main declarations
For a module over a normed ring:
* `Absorbs`: A set `s` absorbs a set `t` if all large scalings of `s` contain `t`.
* `Absorbent`: A set `s` is absorbent if every point eventually belongs to all large scalings of
`s`.
* `Balanced`: A set `s` is balanced if `a • s ⊆ s` for all `a` of norm less than `1`.
## References
* [H. H. Schaefer, *Topological Vector Spaces*][schaefer1966]
## Tags
absorbent, balanced, locally convex, LCTVS
-/
open Set
open Pointwise Topology
variable {𝕜 𝕝 E F : Type*} {ι : Sort*} {κ : ι → Sort*}
section SeminormedRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜]
section SMul
variable [SMul 𝕜 E] {s A B : Set E}
variable (𝕜) in
/-- A set `A` is balanced if `a • A` is contained in `A` whenever `a` has norm at most `1`. -/
def Balanced (A : Set E) :=
∀ a : 𝕜, ‖a‖ ≤ 1 → a • A ⊆ A
lemma absorbs_iff_norm : Absorbs 𝕜 A B ↔ ∃ r, ∀ c : 𝕜, r ≤ ‖c‖ → B ⊆ c • A :=
Filter.atTop_basis.cobounded_of_norm.eventually_iff.trans <| by simp only [true_and]; rfl
alias ⟨_, Absorbs.of_norm⟩ := absorbs_iff_norm
| lemma Absorbs.exists_pos (h : Absorbs 𝕜 A B) : ∃ r > 0, ∀ c : 𝕜, r ≤ ‖c‖ → B ⊆ c • A :=
let ⟨r, hr₁, hr⟩ := (Filter.atTop_basis' 1).cobounded_of_norm.eventually_iff.1 h
| Mathlib/Analysis/LocallyConvex/Basic.lean | 65 | 66 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.SmallSets
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousOn
/-!
# Basic results on uniform spaces
Uniform spaces are a generalization of metric spaces and topological groups.
## Main definitions
In this file we define a complete lattice structure on the type `UniformSpace X`
of uniform structures on `X`, as well as the pullback (`UniformSpace.comap`) of uniform structures
coming from the pullback of filters.
Like distance functions, uniform structures cannot be pushed forward in general.
## Notations
Localized in `Uniformity`, we have the notation `𝓤 X` for the uniformity on a uniform space `X`,
and `○` for composition of relations, seen as terms with type `Set (X × X)`.
## References
The formalization uses the books:
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
* [I. M. James, *Topologies and Uniformities*][james1999]
But it makes a more systematic use of the filter library.
-/
open Set Filter Topology
universe u v ua ub uc ud
/-!
### Relations, seen as `Set (α × α)`
-/
variable {α : Type ua} {β : Type ub} {γ : Type uc} {δ : Type ud} {ι : Sort*}
open Uniformity
section UniformSpace
variable [UniformSpace α]
/-- If `s ∈ 𝓤 α`, then for any natural `n`, for a subset `t` of a sufficiently small set in `𝓤 α`,
we have `t ○ t ○ ... ○ t ⊆ s` (`n` compositions). -/
theorem eventually_uniformity_iterate_comp_subset {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) (n : ℕ) :
∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, (t ○ ·)^[n] t ⊆ s := by
suffices ∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, t ⊆ s ∧ (t ○ ·)^[n] t ⊆ s from (eventually_and.1 this).2
induction n generalizing s with
| zero => simpa
| succ _ ihn =>
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs with ⟨t, htU, hts⟩
refine (ihn htU).mono fun U hU => ?_
rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply']
exact
⟨hU.1.trans <| (subset_comp_self <| refl_le_uniformity htU).trans hts,
(compRel_mono hU.1 hU.2).trans hts⟩
/-- If `s ∈ 𝓤 α`, then for a subset `t` of a sufficiently small set in `𝓤 α`,
we have `t ○ t ⊆ s`. -/
theorem eventually_uniformity_comp_subset {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, t ○ t ⊆ s :=
eventually_uniformity_iterate_comp_subset hs 1
/-!
### Balls in uniform spaces
-/
namespace UniformSpace
open UniformSpace (ball)
lemma isOpen_ball (x : α) {V : Set (α × α)} (hV : IsOpen V) : IsOpen (ball x V) :=
hV.preimage <| .prodMk_right _
lemma isClosed_ball (x : α) {V : Set (α × α)} (hV : IsClosed V) : IsClosed (ball x V) :=
hV.preimage <| .prodMk_right _
/-!
### Neighborhoods in uniform spaces
-/
theorem hasBasis_nhds_prod (x y : α) :
HasBasis (𝓝 (x, y)) (fun s => s ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsSymmetricRel s) fun s => ball x s ×ˢ ball y s := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
apply (hasBasis_nhds x).prod_same_index (hasBasis_nhds y)
rintro U V ⟨U_in, U_symm⟩ ⟨V_in, V_symm⟩
exact
⟨U ∩ V, ⟨(𝓤 α).inter_sets U_in V_in, U_symm.inter V_symm⟩, ball_inter_left x U V,
ball_inter_right y U V⟩
end UniformSpace
open UniformSpace
theorem nhds_eq_uniformity_prod {a b : α} :
𝓝 (a, b) =
(𝓤 α).lift' fun s : Set (α × α) => { y : α | (y, a) ∈ s } ×ˢ { y : α | (b, y) ∈ s } := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq, nhds_nhds_eq_uniformity_uniformity_prod, lift_lift'_same_eq_lift']
· exact fun s => monotone_const.set_prod monotone_preimage
· refine fun t => Monotone.set_prod ?_ monotone_const
exact monotone_preimage (f := fun y => (y, a))
theorem nhdset_of_mem_uniformity {d : Set (α × α)} (s : Set (α × α)) (hd : d ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t : Set (α × α), IsOpen t ∧ s ⊆ t ∧
t ⊆ { p | ∃ x y, (p.1, x) ∈ d ∧ (x, y) ∈ s ∧ (y, p.2) ∈ d } := by
let cl_d := { p : α × α | ∃ x y, (p.1, x) ∈ d ∧ (x, y) ∈ s ∧ (y, p.2) ∈ d }
have : ∀ p ∈ s, ∃ t, t ⊆ cl_d ∧ IsOpen t ∧ p ∈ t := fun ⟨x, y⟩ hp =>
mem_nhds_iff.mp <|
show cl_d ∈ 𝓝 (x, y) by
rw [nhds_eq_uniformity_prod, mem_lift'_sets]
· exact ⟨d, hd, fun ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => ⟨x, y, ha, hp, hb⟩⟩
· exact fun _ _ h _ h' => ⟨h h'.1, h h'.2⟩
choose t ht using this
exact ⟨(⋃ p : α × α, ⋃ h : p ∈ s, t p h : Set (α × α)),
isOpen_iUnion fun p : α × α => isOpen_iUnion fun hp => (ht p hp).right.left,
fun ⟨a, b⟩ hp => by
simp only [mem_iUnion, Prod.exists]; exact ⟨a, b, hp, (ht (a, b) hp).right.right⟩,
iUnion_subset fun p => iUnion_subset fun hp => (ht p hp).left⟩
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem nhds_le_uniformity (x : α) : 𝓝 (x, x) ≤ 𝓤 α := by
intro V V_in
rcases comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets V_in with ⟨w, w_in, w_symm, w_sub⟩
have : ball x w ×ˢ ball x w ∈ 𝓝 (x, x) := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
exact prod_mem_prod (ball_mem_nhds x w_in) (ball_mem_nhds x w_in)
apply mem_of_superset this
rintro ⟨u, v⟩ ⟨u_in, v_in⟩
exact w_sub (mem_comp_of_mem_ball w_symm u_in v_in)
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem iSup_nhds_le_uniformity : ⨆ x : α, 𝓝 (x, x) ≤ 𝓤 α :=
iSup_le nhds_le_uniformity
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem nhdsSet_diagonal_le_uniformity : 𝓝ˢ (diagonal α) ≤ 𝓤 α :=
(nhdsSet_diagonal α).trans_le iSup_nhds_le_uniformity
section
variable (α)
theorem UniformSpace.has_seq_basis [IsCountablyGenerated <| 𝓤 α] :
∃ V : ℕ → Set (α × α), HasAntitoneBasis (𝓤 α) V ∧ ∀ n, IsSymmetricRel (V n) :=
let ⟨U, hsym, hbasis⟩ := (@UniformSpace.hasBasis_symmetric α _).exists_antitone_subbasis
⟨U, hbasis, fun n => (hsym n).2⟩
end
/-!
### Closure and interior in uniform spaces
-/
theorem closure_eq_uniformity (s : Set <| α × α) :
closure s = ⋂ V ∈ { V | V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsSymmetricRel V }, V ○ s ○ V := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp +contextual only
[mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis (UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds_prod x y), mem_iInter, mem_setOf_eq,
and_imp, mem_comp_comp, exists_prop, ← mem_inter_iff, inter_comm, Set.Nonempty]
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_closed :
HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsClosed V) id := by
refine Filter.hasBasis_self.2 fun t h => ?_
rcases comp_comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets h with ⟨w, w_in, w_symm, r⟩
refine ⟨closure w, mem_of_superset w_in subset_closure, isClosed_closure, ?_⟩
refine Subset.trans ?_ r
rw [closure_eq_uniformity]
apply iInter_subset_of_subset
apply iInter_subset
exact ⟨w_in, w_symm⟩
theorem uniformity_eq_uniformity_closure : 𝓤 α = (𝓤 α).lift' closure :=
Eq.symm <| uniformity_hasBasis_closed.lift'_closure_eq_self fun _ => And.right
theorem Filter.HasBasis.uniformity_closure {p : ι → Prop} {U : ι → Set (α × α)}
(h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p U) : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun i => closure (U i) :=
(@uniformity_eq_uniformity_closure α _).symm ▸ h.lift'_closure
/-- Closed entourages form a basis of the uniformity filter. -/
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_closure : HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α) closure :=
(𝓤 α).basis_sets.uniformity_closure
theorem closure_eq_inter_uniformity {t : Set (α × α)} : closure t = ⋂ d ∈ 𝓤 α, d ○ (t ○ d) :=
calc
closure t = ⋂ (V) (_ : V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsSymmetricRel V), V ○ t ○ V := closure_eq_uniformity t
_ = ⋂ V ∈ 𝓤 α, V ○ t ○ V :=
Eq.symm <|
UniformSpace.hasBasis_symmetric.biInter_mem fun _ _ hV =>
compRel_mono (compRel_mono hV Subset.rfl) hV
_ = ⋂ V ∈ 𝓤 α, V ○ (t ○ V) := by simp only [compRel_assoc]
theorem uniformity_eq_uniformity_interior : 𝓤 α = (𝓤 α).lift' interior :=
le_antisymm
(le_iInf₂ fun d hd => by
let ⟨s, hs, hs_comp⟩ := comp3_mem_uniformity hd
let ⟨t, ht, hst, ht_comp⟩ := nhdset_of_mem_uniformity s hs
have : s ⊆ interior d :=
calc
s ⊆ t := hst
_ ⊆ interior d :=
ht.subset_interior_iff.mpr fun x (hx : x ∈ t) =>
let ⟨x, y, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := ht_comp hx
hs_comp ⟨x, h₁, y, h₂, h₃⟩
have : interior d ∈ 𝓤 α := by filter_upwards [hs] using this
simp [this])
fun _ hs => ((𝓤 α).lift' interior).sets_of_superset (mem_lift' hs) interior_subset
theorem interior_mem_uniformity {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : interior s ∈ 𝓤 α := by
rw [uniformity_eq_uniformity_interior]; exact mem_lift' hs
theorem mem_uniformity_isClosed {s : Set (α × α)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : ∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, IsClosed t ∧ t ⊆ s :=
let ⟨t, ⟨ht_mem, htc⟩, hts⟩ := uniformity_hasBasis_closed.mem_iff.1 h
⟨t, ht_mem, htc, hts⟩
theorem isOpen_iff_isOpen_ball_subset {s : Set α} :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ V ∈ 𝓤 α, IsOpen V ∧ ball x V ⊆ s := by
rw [isOpen_iff_ball_subset]
constructor <;> intro h x hx
· obtain ⟨V, hV, hV'⟩ := h x hx
exact
⟨interior V, interior_mem_uniformity hV, isOpen_interior,
(ball_mono interior_subset x).trans hV'⟩
· obtain ⟨V, hV, -, hV'⟩ := h x hx
exact ⟨V, hV, hV'⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-18")] alias
isOpen_iff_open_ball_subset := isOpen_iff_isOpen_ball_subset
/-- The uniform neighborhoods of all points of a dense set cover the whole space. -/
theorem Dense.biUnion_uniformity_ball {s : Set α} {U : Set (α × α)} (hs : Dense s) (hU : U ∈ 𝓤 α) :
⋃ x ∈ s, ball x U = univ := by
refine iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => ?_
rcases hs.inter_nhds_nonempty (mem_nhds_right y hU) with ⟨x, hxs, hxy : (x, y) ∈ U⟩
exact ⟨x, hxs, hxy⟩
/-- The uniform neighborhoods of all points of a dense indexed collection cover the whole space. -/
lemma DenseRange.iUnion_uniformity_ball {ι : Type*} {xs : ι → α}
(xs_dense : DenseRange xs) {U : Set (α × α)} (hU : U ∈ uniformity α) :
⋃ i, UniformSpace.ball (xs i) U = univ := by
rw [← biUnion_range (f := xs) (g := fun x ↦ UniformSpace.ball x U)]
exact Dense.biUnion_uniformity_ball xs_dense hU
/-!
### Uniformity bases
-/
/-- Open elements of `𝓤 α` form a basis of `𝓤 α`. -/
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_open : HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsOpen V) id :=
hasBasis_self.2 fun s hs =>
⟨interior s, interior_mem_uniformity hs, isOpen_interior, interior_subset⟩
theorem Filter.HasBasis.mem_uniformity_iff {p : β → Prop} {s : β → Set (α × α)}
(h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) {t : Set (α × α)} :
t ∈ 𝓤 α ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ ∀ a b, (a, b) ∈ s i → (a, b) ∈ t :=
h.mem_iff.trans <| by simp only [Prod.forall, subset_def]
/-- Open elements `s : Set (α × α)` of `𝓤 α` such that `(x, y) ∈ s ↔ (y, x) ∈ s` form a basis
of `𝓤 α`. -/
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_open_symmetric :
HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsOpen V ∧ IsSymmetricRel V) id := by
simp only [← and_assoc]
refine uniformity_hasBasis_open.restrict fun s hs => ⟨symmetrizeRel s, ?_⟩
exact
⟨⟨symmetrize_mem_uniformity hs.1, IsOpen.inter hs.2 (hs.2.preimage continuous_swap)⟩,
symmetric_symmetrizeRel s, symmetrizeRel_subset_self s⟩
theorem comp_open_symm_mem_uniformity_sets {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, IsOpen t ∧ IsSymmetricRel t ∧ t ○ t ⊆ s := by
obtain ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs
obtain ⟨u, ⟨hu₁, hu₂, hu₃⟩, hu₄ : u ⊆ t⟩ := uniformity_hasBasis_open_symmetric.mem_iff.mp ht₁
exact ⟨u, hu₁, hu₂, hu₃, (compRel_mono hu₄ hu₄).trans ht₂⟩
end UniformSpace
open uniformity
section Constructions
instance : PartialOrder (UniformSpace α) :=
PartialOrder.lift (fun u => 𝓤[u]) fun _ _ => UniformSpace.ext
protected theorem UniformSpace.le_def {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} : u₁ ≤ u₂ ↔ 𝓤[u₁] ≤ 𝓤[u₂] := Iff.rfl
instance : InfSet (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨fun s =>
UniformSpace.ofCore
{ uniformity := ⨅ u ∈ s, 𝓤[u]
refl := le_iInf fun u => le_iInf fun _ => u.toCore.refl
symm := le_iInf₂ fun u hu =>
le_trans (map_mono <| iInf_le_of_le _ <| iInf_le _ hu) u.symm
comp := le_iInf₂ fun u hu =>
le_trans (lift'_mono (iInf_le_of_le _ <| iInf_le _ hu) <| le_rfl) u.comp }⟩
protected theorem UniformSpace.sInf_le {tt : Set (UniformSpace α)} {t : UniformSpace α}
(h : t ∈ tt) : sInf tt ≤ t :=
show ⨅ u ∈ tt, 𝓤[u] ≤ 𝓤[t] from iInf₂_le t h
protected theorem UniformSpace.le_sInf {tt : Set (UniformSpace α)} {t : UniformSpace α}
(h : ∀ t' ∈ tt, t ≤ t') : t ≤ sInf tt :=
show 𝓤[t] ≤ ⨅ u ∈ tt, 𝓤[u] from le_iInf₂ h
instance : Top (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨@UniformSpace.mk α ⊤ ⊤ le_top le_top fun x ↦ by simp only [nhds_top, comap_top]⟩
instance : Bot (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨{ toTopologicalSpace := ⊥
uniformity := 𝓟 idRel
symm := by simp [Tendsto]
comp := lift'_le (mem_principal_self _) <| principal_mono.2 id_compRel.subset
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity := fun s => by
let _ : TopologicalSpace α := ⊥; have := discreteTopology_bot α
simp [idRel] }⟩
instance : Min (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨fun u₁ u₂ =>
{ uniformity := 𝓤[u₁] ⊓ 𝓤[u₂]
symm := u₁.symm.inf u₂.symm
comp := (lift'_inf_le _ _ _).trans <| inf_le_inf u₁.comp u₂.comp
toTopologicalSpace := u₁.toTopologicalSpace ⊓ u₂.toTopologicalSpace
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity := fun _ ↦ by
rw [@nhds_inf _ u₁.toTopologicalSpace _, @nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ u₁,
@nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ u₂, comap_inf] }⟩
instance : CompleteLattice (UniformSpace α) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (PartialOrder (UniformSpace α)) with
sup := fun a b => sInf { x | a ≤ x ∧ b ≤ x }
le_sup_left := fun _ _ => UniformSpace.le_sInf fun _ ⟨h, _⟩ => h
le_sup_right := fun _ _ => UniformSpace.le_sInf fun _ ⟨_, h⟩ => h
sup_le := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => UniformSpace.sInf_le ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
le_inf := fun a _ _ h₁ h₂ => show a.uniformity ≤ _ from le_inf h₁ h₂
inf_le_left := fun a _ => show _ ≤ a.uniformity from inf_le_left
inf_le_right := fun _ b => show _ ≤ b.uniformity from inf_le_right
top := ⊤
le_top := fun a => show a.uniformity ≤ ⊤ from le_top
bot := ⊥
bot_le := fun u => u.toCore.refl
sSup := fun tt => sInf { t | ∀ t' ∈ tt, t' ≤ t }
le_sSup := fun _ _ h => UniformSpace.le_sInf fun _ h' => h' _ h
sSup_le := fun _ _ h => UniformSpace.sInf_le h
sInf := sInf
le_sInf := fun _ _ hs => UniformSpace.le_sInf hs
sInf_le := fun _ _ ha => UniformSpace.sInf_le ha }
theorem iInf_uniformity {ι : Sort*} {u : ι → UniformSpace α} : 𝓤[iInf u] = ⨅ i, 𝓤[u i] :=
iInf_range
theorem inf_uniformity {u v : UniformSpace α} : 𝓤[u ⊓ v] = 𝓤[u] ⊓ 𝓤[v] := rfl
lemma bot_uniformity : 𝓤[(⊥ : UniformSpace α)] = 𝓟 idRel := rfl
lemma top_uniformity : 𝓤[(⊤ : UniformSpace α)] = ⊤ := rfl
instance inhabitedUniformSpace : Inhabited (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨⊥⟩
instance inhabitedUniformSpaceCore : Inhabited (UniformSpace.Core α) :=
⟨@UniformSpace.toCore _ default⟩
instance [Subsingleton α] : Unique (UniformSpace α) where
uniq u := bot_unique <| le_principal_iff.2 <| by
rw [idRel, ← diagonal, diagonal_eq_univ]; exact univ_mem
/-- Given `f : α → β` and a uniformity `u` on `β`, the inverse image of `u` under `f`
is the inverse image in the filter sense of the induced function `α × α → β × β`.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev UniformSpace.comap (f : α → β) (u : UniformSpace β) : UniformSpace α where
uniformity := 𝓤[u].comap fun p : α × α => (f p.1, f p.2)
symm := by
simp only [tendsto_comap_iff, Prod.swap, (· ∘ ·)]
exact tendsto_swap_uniformity.comp tendsto_comap
comp := le_trans
(by
rw [comap_lift'_eq, comap_lift'_eq2]
· exact lift'_mono' fun s _ ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨x, h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨f x, h₁, h₂⟩
· exact monotone_id.compRel monotone_id)
(comap_mono u.comp)
toTopologicalSpace := u.toTopologicalSpace.induced f
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity x := by
simp only [nhds_induced, nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, comap_comap, Function.comp_def]
theorem uniformity_comap {_ : UniformSpace β} (f : α → β) :
𝓤[UniformSpace.comap f ‹_›] = comap (Prod.map f f) (𝓤 β) :=
rfl
lemma ball_preimage {f : α → β} {U : Set (β × β)} {x : α} :
UniformSpace.ball x (Prod.map f f ⁻¹' U) = f ⁻¹' UniformSpace.ball (f x) U := by
ext : 1
simp only [UniformSpace.ball, mem_preimage, Prod.map_apply]
@[simp]
theorem uniformSpace_comap_id {α : Type*} : UniformSpace.comap (id : α → α) = id := by
ext : 2
rw [uniformity_comap, Prod.map_id, comap_id]
theorem UniformSpace.comap_comap {α β γ} {uγ : UniformSpace γ} {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} :
UniformSpace.comap (g ∘ f) uγ = UniformSpace.comap f (UniformSpace.comap g uγ) := by
ext1
simp only [uniformity_comap, Filter.comap_comap, Prod.map_comp_map]
theorem UniformSpace.comap_inf {α γ} {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace γ} {f : α → γ} :
(u₁ ⊓ u₂).comap f = u₁.comap f ⊓ u₂.comap f :=
UniformSpace.ext Filter.comap_inf
theorem UniformSpace.comap_iInf {ι α γ} {u : ι → UniformSpace γ} {f : α → γ} :
(⨅ i, u i).comap f = ⨅ i, (u i).comap f := by
ext : 1
simp [uniformity_comap, iInf_uniformity]
theorem UniformSpace.comap_mono {α γ} {f : α → γ} :
Monotone fun u : UniformSpace γ => u.comap f := fun _ _ hu =>
Filter.comap_mono hu
theorem uniformContinuous_iff {α β} {uα : UniformSpace α} {uβ : UniformSpace β} {f : α → β} :
UniformContinuous f ↔ uα ≤ uβ.comap f :=
Filter.map_le_iff_le_comap
theorem le_iff_uniformContinuous_id {u v : UniformSpace α} :
u ≤ v ↔ @UniformContinuous _ _ u v id := by
rw [uniformContinuous_iff, uniformSpace_comap_id, id]
theorem uniformContinuous_comap {f : α → β} [u : UniformSpace β] :
@UniformContinuous α β (UniformSpace.comap f u) u f :=
tendsto_comap
theorem uniformContinuous_comap' {f : γ → β} {g : α → γ} [v : UniformSpace β] [u : UniformSpace α]
(h : UniformContinuous (f ∘ g)) : @UniformContinuous α γ u (UniformSpace.comap f v) g :=
tendsto_comap_iff.2 h
namespace UniformSpace
theorem to_nhds_mono {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} (h : u₁ ≤ u₂) (a : α) :
@nhds _ (@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₁) a ≤
@nhds _ (@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₂) a := by
rw [@nhds_eq_uniformity α u₁ a, @nhds_eq_uniformity α u₂ a]; exact lift'_mono h le_rfl
theorem toTopologicalSpace_mono {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} (h : u₁ ≤ u₂) :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₁ ≤ @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₂ :=
le_of_nhds_le_nhds <| to_nhds_mono h
theorem toTopologicalSpace_comap {f : α → β} {u : UniformSpace β} :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ (UniformSpace.comap f u) =
TopologicalSpace.induced f (@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace β u) :=
rfl
lemma uniformSpace_eq_bot {u : UniformSpace α} : u = ⊥ ↔ idRel ∈ 𝓤[u] :=
le_bot_iff.symm.trans le_principal_iff
protected lemma _root_.Filter.HasBasis.uniformSpace_eq_bot {ι p} {s : ι → Set (α × α)}
{u : UniformSpace α} (h : 𝓤[u].HasBasis p s) :
u = ⊥ ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ Pairwise fun x y : α ↦ (x, y) ∉ s i := by
simp [uniformSpace_eq_bot, h.mem_iff, subset_def, Pairwise, not_imp_not]
theorem toTopologicalSpace_bot : @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace α ⊥ = ⊥ := rfl
theorem toTopologicalSpace_top : @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace α ⊤ = ⊤ := rfl
theorem toTopologicalSpace_iInf {ι : Sort*} {u : ι → UniformSpace α} :
(iInf u).toTopologicalSpace = ⨅ i, (u i).toTopologicalSpace :=
TopologicalSpace.ext_nhds fun a ↦ by simp only [@nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ (iInf u), nhds_iInf,
iInf_uniformity, @nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ (u _), Filter.comap_iInf]
theorem toTopologicalSpace_sInf {s : Set (UniformSpace α)} :
(sInf s).toTopologicalSpace = ⨅ i ∈ s, @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace α i := by
rw [sInf_eq_iInf]
simp only [← toTopologicalSpace_iInf]
theorem toTopologicalSpace_inf {u v : UniformSpace α} :
(u ⊓ v).toTopologicalSpace = u.toTopologicalSpace ⊓ v.toTopologicalSpace :=
rfl
end UniformSpace
theorem UniformContinuous.continuous [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) : Continuous f :=
continuous_iff_le_induced.mpr <| UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace_mono <|
uniformContinuous_iff.1 hf
/-- Uniform space structure on `ULift α`. -/
instance ULift.uniformSpace [UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace (ULift α) :=
UniformSpace.comap ULift.down ‹_›
/-- Uniform space structure on `αᵒᵈ`. -/
instance OrderDual.instUniformSpace [UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace (αᵒᵈ) :=
‹UniformSpace α›
section UniformContinuousInfi
-- TODO: add an `iff` lemma?
theorem UniformContinuous.inf_rng {f : α → β} {u₁ : UniformSpace α} {u₂ u₃ : UniformSpace β}
(h₁ : UniformContinuous[u₁, u₂] f) (h₂ : UniformContinuous[u₁, u₃] f) :
UniformContinuous[u₁, u₂ ⊓ u₃] f :=
tendsto_inf.mpr ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
theorem UniformContinuous.inf_dom_left {f : α → β} {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} {u₃ : UniformSpace β}
(hf : UniformContinuous[u₁, u₃] f) : UniformContinuous[u₁ ⊓ u₂, u₃] f :=
tendsto_inf_left hf
theorem UniformContinuous.inf_dom_right {f : α → β} {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} {u₃ : UniformSpace β}
(hf : UniformContinuous[u₂, u₃] f) : UniformContinuous[u₁ ⊓ u₂, u₃] f :=
tendsto_inf_right hf
theorem uniformContinuous_sInf_dom {f : α → β} {u₁ : Set (UniformSpace α)} {u₂ : UniformSpace β}
{u : UniformSpace α} (h₁ : u ∈ u₁) (hf : UniformContinuous[u, u₂] f) :
UniformContinuous[sInf u₁, u₂] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [sInf_eq_iInf', iInf_uniformity]
exact tendsto_iInf' ⟨u, h₁⟩ hf
theorem uniformContinuous_sInf_rng {f : α → β} {u₁ : UniformSpace α} {u₂ : Set (UniformSpace β)} :
UniformContinuous[u₁, sInf u₂] f ↔ ∀ u ∈ u₂, UniformContinuous[u₁, u] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [sInf_eq_iInf', iInf_uniformity, tendsto_iInf, SetCoe.forall]
theorem uniformContinuous_iInf_dom {f : α → β} {u₁ : ι → UniformSpace α} {u₂ : UniformSpace β}
{i : ι} (hf : UniformContinuous[u₁ i, u₂] f) : UniformContinuous[iInf u₁, u₂] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [iInf_uniformity]
exact tendsto_iInf' i hf
theorem uniformContinuous_iInf_rng {f : α → β} {u₁ : UniformSpace α} {u₂ : ι → UniformSpace β} :
UniformContinuous[u₁, iInf u₂] f ↔ ∀ i, UniformContinuous[u₁, u₂ i] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [iInf_uniformity, tendsto_iInf]
end UniformContinuousInfi
/-- A uniform space with the discrete uniformity has the discrete topology. -/
theorem discreteTopology_of_discrete_uniformity [hα : UniformSpace α] (h : uniformity α = 𝓟 idRel) :
DiscreteTopology α :=
⟨(UniformSpace.ext h.symm : ⊥ = hα) ▸ rfl⟩
instance : UniformSpace Empty := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace PUnit := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace Bool := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace ℕ := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace ℤ := ⊥
section
variable [UniformSpace α]
open Additive Multiplicative
instance : UniformSpace (Additive α) := ‹UniformSpace α›
instance : UniformSpace (Multiplicative α) := ‹UniformSpace α›
theorem uniformContinuous_ofMul : UniformContinuous (ofMul : α → Additive α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformContinuous_toMul : UniformContinuous (toMul : Additive α → α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformContinuous_ofAdd : UniformContinuous (ofAdd : α → Multiplicative α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformContinuous_toAdd : UniformContinuous (toAdd : Multiplicative α → α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformity_additive : 𝓤 (Additive α) = (𝓤 α).map (Prod.map ofMul ofMul) := rfl
theorem uniformity_multiplicative : 𝓤 (Multiplicative α) = (𝓤 α).map (Prod.map ofAdd ofAdd) := rfl
end
instance instUniformSpaceSubtype {p : α → Prop} [t : UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace (Subtype p) :=
UniformSpace.comap Subtype.val t
theorem uniformity_subtype {p : α → Prop} [UniformSpace α] :
𝓤 (Subtype p) = comap (fun q : Subtype p × Subtype p => (q.1.1, q.2.1)) (𝓤 α) :=
rfl
theorem uniformity_setCoe {s : Set α} [UniformSpace α] :
𝓤 s = comap (Prod.map ((↑) : s → α) ((↑) : s → α)) (𝓤 α) :=
rfl
theorem map_uniformity_set_coe {s : Set α} [UniformSpace α] :
map (Prod.map (↑) (↑)) (𝓤 s) = 𝓤 α ⊓ 𝓟 (s ×ˢ s) := by
rw [uniformity_setCoe, map_comap, range_prodMap, Subtype.range_val]
theorem uniformContinuous_subtype_val {p : α → Prop} [UniformSpace α] :
UniformContinuous (Subtype.val : { a : α // p a } → α) :=
uniformContinuous_comap
theorem UniformContinuous.subtype_mk {p : α → Prop} [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : β → α}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) (h : ∀ x, p (f x)) :
UniformContinuous (fun x => ⟨f x, h x⟩ : β → Subtype p) :=
uniformContinuous_comap' hf
theorem uniformContinuousOn_iff_restrict [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
UniformContinuousOn f s ↔ UniformContinuous (s.restrict f) := by
delta UniformContinuousOn UniformContinuous
rw [← map_uniformity_set_coe, tendsto_map'_iff]; rfl
theorem tendsto_of_uniformContinuous_subtype [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β}
{s : Set α} {a : α} (hf : UniformContinuous fun x : s => f x.val) (ha : s ∈ 𝓝 a) :
Tendsto f (𝓝 a) (𝓝 (f a)) := by
rw [(@map_nhds_subtype_coe_eq_nhds α _ s a (mem_of_mem_nhds ha) ha).symm]
exact tendsto_map' hf.continuous.continuousAt
theorem UniformContinuousOn.continuousOn [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α}
(h : UniformContinuousOn f s) : ContinuousOn f s := by
rw [uniformContinuousOn_iff_restrict] at h
rw [continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict]
exact h.continuous
@[to_additive]
instance [UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace αᵐᵒᵖ :=
UniformSpace.comap MulOpposite.unop ‹_›
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformity_mulOpposite [UniformSpace α] :
𝓤 αᵐᵒᵖ = comap (fun q : αᵐᵒᵖ × αᵐᵒᵖ => (q.1.unop, q.2.unop)) (𝓤 α) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem comap_uniformity_mulOpposite [UniformSpace α] :
comap (fun p : α × α => (MulOpposite.op p.1, MulOpposite.op p.2)) (𝓤 αᵐᵒᵖ) = 𝓤 α := by
simpa [uniformity_mulOpposite, comap_comap, (· ∘ ·)] using comap_id
namespace MulOpposite
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformContinuous_unop [UniformSpace α] : UniformContinuous (unop : αᵐᵒᵖ → α) :=
uniformContinuous_comap
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformContinuous_op [UniformSpace α] : UniformContinuous (op : α → αᵐᵒᵖ) :=
uniformContinuous_comap' uniformContinuous_id
end MulOpposite
section Prod
open UniformSpace
/- a similar product space is possible on the function space (uniformity of pointwise convergence),
but we want to have the uniformity of uniform convergence on function spaces -/
instance instUniformSpaceProd [u₁ : UniformSpace α] [u₂ : UniformSpace β] : UniformSpace (α × β) :=
u₁.comap Prod.fst ⊓ u₂.comap Prod.snd
-- check the above produces no diamond for `simp` and typeclass search
example [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
(instTopologicalSpaceProd : TopologicalSpace (α × β)) = UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace := by
with_reducible_and_instances rfl
theorem uniformity_prod [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
𝓤 (α × β) =
((𝓤 α).comap fun p : (α × β) × α × β => (p.1.1, p.2.1)) ⊓
(𝓤 β).comap fun p : (α × β) × α × β => (p.1.2, p.2.2) :=
rfl
instance [UniformSpace α] [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 α)]
[UniformSpace β] [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 β)] : IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 (α × β)) := by
rw [uniformity_prod]
infer_instance
theorem uniformity_prod_eq_comap_prod [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
𝓤 (α × β) =
comap (fun p : (α × β) × α × β => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) (𝓤 α ×ˢ 𝓤 β) := by
simp_rw [uniformity_prod, prod_eq_inf, Filter.comap_inf, Filter.comap_comap, Function.comp_def]
theorem uniformity_prod_eq_prod [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
𝓤 (α × β) = map (fun p : (α × α) × β × β => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) (𝓤 α ×ˢ 𝓤 β) := by
rw [map_swap4_eq_comap, uniformity_prod_eq_comap_prod]
theorem mem_uniformity_of_uniformContinuous_invariant [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
{s : Set (β × β)} {f : α → α → β} (hf : UniformContinuous fun p : α × α => f p.1 p.2)
(hs : s ∈ 𝓤 β) : ∃ u ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ a b c, (a, b) ∈ u → (f a c, f b c) ∈ s := by
rw [UniformContinuous, uniformity_prod_eq_prod, tendsto_map'_iff] at hf
rcases mem_prod_iff.1 (mem_map.1 <| hf hs) with ⟨u, hu, v, hv, huvt⟩
exact ⟨u, hu, fun a b c hab => @huvt ((_, _), (_, _)) ⟨hab, refl_mem_uniformity hv⟩⟩
/-- An entourage of the diagonal in `α` and an entourage in `β` yield an entourage in `α × β`
once we permute coordinates. -/
def entourageProd (u : Set (α × α)) (v : Set (β × β)) : Set ((α × β) × α × β) :=
{((a₁, b₁),(a₂, b₂)) | (a₁, a₂) ∈ u ∧ (b₁, b₂) ∈ v}
theorem mem_entourageProd {u : Set (α × α)} {v : Set (β × β)} {p : (α × β) × α × β} :
p ∈ entourageProd u v ↔ (p.1.1, p.2.1) ∈ u ∧ (p.1.2, p.2.2) ∈ v := Iff.rfl
theorem entourageProd_mem_uniformity [t₁ : UniformSpace α] [t₂ : UniformSpace β] {u : Set (α × α)}
{v : Set (β × β)} (hu : u ∈ 𝓤 α) (hv : v ∈ 𝓤 β) :
entourageProd u v ∈ 𝓤 (α × β) := by
rw [uniformity_prod]; exact inter_mem_inf (preimage_mem_comap hu) (preimage_mem_comap hv)
theorem ball_entourageProd (u : Set (α × α)) (v : Set (β × β)) (x : α × β) :
ball x (entourageProd u v) = ball x.1 u ×ˢ ball x.2 v := by
ext p; simp only [ball, entourageProd, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_prod, Set.mem_preimage]
lemma IsSymmetricRel.entourageProd {u : Set (α × α)} {v : Set (β × β)}
(hu : IsSymmetricRel u) (hv : IsSymmetricRel v) :
IsSymmetricRel (entourageProd u v) :=
Set.ext fun _ ↦ and_congr hu.mk_mem_comm hv.mk_mem_comm
theorem Filter.HasBasis.uniformity_prod {ιa ιb : Type*} [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
{pa : ιa → Prop} {pb : ιb → Prop} {sa : ιa → Set (α × α)} {sb : ιb → Set (β × β)}
(ha : (𝓤 α).HasBasis pa sa) (hb : (𝓤 β).HasBasis pb sb) :
(𝓤 (α × β)).HasBasis (fun i : ιa × ιb ↦ pa i.1 ∧ pb i.2)
(fun i ↦ entourageProd (sa i.1) (sb i.2)) :=
(ha.comap _).inf (hb.comap _)
theorem entourageProd_subset [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
{s : Set ((α × β) × α × β)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 (α × β)) :
∃ u ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ v ∈ 𝓤 β, entourageProd u v ⊆ s := by
rcases (((𝓤 α).basis_sets.uniformity_prod (𝓤 β).basis_sets).mem_iff' s).1 h with ⟨w, hw⟩
use w.1, hw.1.1, w.2, hw.1.2, hw.2
theorem tendsto_prod_uniformity_fst [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
Tendsto (fun p : (α × β) × α × β => (p.1.1, p.2.1)) (𝓤 (α × β)) (𝓤 α) :=
le_trans (map_mono inf_le_left) map_comap_le
theorem tendsto_prod_uniformity_snd [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
Tendsto (fun p : (α × β) × α × β => (p.1.2, p.2.2)) (𝓤 (α × β)) (𝓤 β) :=
le_trans (map_mono inf_le_right) map_comap_le
theorem uniformContinuous_fst [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => p.1 :=
tendsto_prod_uniformity_fst
theorem uniformContinuous_snd [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => p.2 :=
tendsto_prod_uniformity_snd
variable [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] [UniformSpace γ]
theorem UniformContinuous.prodMk {f₁ : α → β} {f₂ : α → γ} (h₁ : UniformContinuous f₁)
(h₂ : UniformContinuous f₂) : UniformContinuous fun a => (f₁ a, f₂ a) := by
rw [UniformContinuous, uniformity_prod]
exact tendsto_inf.2 ⟨tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₁, tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₂⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias UniformContinuous.prod_mk := UniformContinuous.prodMk
theorem UniformContinuous.prodMk_left {f : α × β → γ} (h : UniformContinuous f) (b) :
UniformContinuous fun a => f (a, b) :=
h.comp (uniformContinuous_id.prodMk uniformContinuous_const)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias UniformContinuous.prod_mk_left := UniformContinuous.prodMk_left
theorem UniformContinuous.prodMk_right {f : α × β → γ} (h : UniformContinuous f) (a) :
UniformContinuous fun b => f (a, b) :=
h.comp (uniformContinuous_const.prodMk uniformContinuous_id)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias UniformContinuous.prod_mk_right := UniformContinuous.prodMk_right
theorem UniformContinuous.prodMap [UniformSpace δ] {f : α → γ} {g : β → δ}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) (hg : UniformContinuous g) : UniformContinuous (Prod.map f g) :=
(hf.comp uniformContinuous_fst).prodMk (hg.comp uniformContinuous_snd)
theorem toTopologicalSpace_prod {α} {β} [u : UniformSpace α] [v : UniformSpace β] :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace (α × β) instUniformSpaceProd =
@instTopologicalSpaceProd α β u.toTopologicalSpace v.toTopologicalSpace :=
rfl
/-- A version of `UniformContinuous.inf_dom_left` for binary functions -/
theorem uniformContinuous_inf_dom_left₂ {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {ua1 ua2 : UniformSpace α}
{ub1 ub2 : UniformSpace β} {uc1 : UniformSpace γ}
(h : by haveI := ua1; haveI := ub1; exact UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := ua1 ⊓ ua2; haveI := ub1 ⊓ ub2
exact UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2 := by
-- proof essentially copied from `continuous_inf_dom_left₂`
have ha := @UniformContinuous.inf_dom_left _ _ id ua1 ua2 ua1 (@uniformContinuous_id _ (id _))
have hb := @UniformContinuous.inf_dom_left _ _ id ub1 ub2 ub1 (@uniformContinuous_id _ (id _))
have h_unif_cont_id :=
@UniformContinuous.prodMap _ _ _ _ (ua1 ⊓ ua2) (ub1 ⊓ ub2) ua1 ub1 _ _ ha hb
exact @UniformContinuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ h h_unif_cont_id
/-- A version of `UniformContinuous.inf_dom_right` for binary functions -/
theorem uniformContinuous_inf_dom_right₂ {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {ua1 ua2 : UniformSpace α}
{ub1 ub2 : UniformSpace β} {uc1 : UniformSpace γ}
(h : by haveI := ua2; haveI := ub2; exact UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := ua1 ⊓ ua2; haveI := ub1 ⊓ ub2
exact UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2 := by
-- proof essentially copied from `continuous_inf_dom_right₂`
have ha := @UniformContinuous.inf_dom_right _ _ id ua1 ua2 ua2 (@uniformContinuous_id _ (id _))
have hb := @UniformContinuous.inf_dom_right _ _ id ub1 ub2 ub2 (@uniformContinuous_id _ (id _))
have h_unif_cont_id :=
@UniformContinuous.prodMap _ _ _ _ (ua1 ⊓ ua2) (ub1 ⊓ ub2) ua2 ub2 _ _ ha hb
exact @UniformContinuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ h h_unif_cont_id
/-- A version of `uniformContinuous_sInf_dom` for binary functions -/
theorem uniformContinuous_sInf_dom₂ {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {uas : Set (UniformSpace α)}
{ubs : Set (UniformSpace β)} {ua : UniformSpace α} {ub : UniformSpace β} {uc : UniformSpace γ}
(ha : ua ∈ uas) (hb : ub ∈ ubs) (hf : UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := sInf uas; haveI := sInf ubs
exact @UniformContinuous _ _ _ uc fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2 := by
-- proof essentially copied from `continuous_sInf_dom`
let _ : UniformSpace (α × β) := instUniformSpaceProd
have ha := uniformContinuous_sInf_dom ha uniformContinuous_id
have hb := uniformContinuous_sInf_dom hb uniformContinuous_id
have h_unif_cont_id := @UniformContinuous.prodMap _ _ _ _ (sInf uas) (sInf ubs) ua ub _ _ ha hb
exact @UniformContinuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ hf h_unif_cont_id
end Prod
section
open UniformSpace Function
variable {δ' : Type*} [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] [UniformSpace γ] [UniformSpace δ]
[UniformSpace δ']
local notation f " ∘₂ " g => Function.bicompr f g
/-- Uniform continuity for functions of two variables. -/
def UniformContinuous₂ (f : α → β → γ) :=
UniformContinuous (uncurry f)
theorem uniformContinuous₂_def (f : α → β → γ) :
UniformContinuous₂ f ↔ UniformContinuous (uncurry f) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem UniformContinuous₂.uniformContinuous {f : α → β → γ} (h : UniformContinuous₂ f) :
UniformContinuous (uncurry f) :=
h
theorem uniformContinuous₂_curry (f : α × β → γ) :
UniformContinuous₂ (Function.curry f) ↔ UniformContinuous f := by
rw [UniformContinuous₂, uncurry_curry]
theorem UniformContinuous₂.comp {f : α → β → γ} {g : γ → δ} (hg : UniformContinuous g)
(hf : UniformContinuous₂ f) : UniformContinuous₂ (g ∘₂ f) :=
hg.comp hf
theorem UniformContinuous₂.bicompl {f : α → β → γ} {ga : δ → α} {gb : δ' → β}
(hf : UniformContinuous₂ f) (hga : UniformContinuous ga) (hgb : UniformContinuous gb) :
UniformContinuous₂ (bicompl f ga gb) :=
hf.uniformContinuous.comp (hga.prodMap hgb)
end
theorem toTopologicalSpace_subtype [u : UniformSpace α] {p : α → Prop} :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace (Subtype p) instUniformSpaceSubtype =
@instTopologicalSpaceSubtype α p u.toTopologicalSpace :=
rfl
section Sum
variable [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
open Sum
-- Obsolete auxiliary definitions and lemmas
/-- Uniformity on a disjoint union. Entourages of the diagonal in the union are obtained
by taking independently an entourage of the diagonal in the first part, and an entourage of
the diagonal in the second part. -/
instance Sum.instUniformSpace : UniformSpace (α ⊕ β) where
uniformity := map (fun p : α × α => (inl p.1, inl p.2)) (𝓤 α) ⊔
map (fun p : β × β => (inr p.1, inr p.2)) (𝓤 β)
symm := fun _ hs ↦ ⟨symm_le_uniformity hs.1, symm_le_uniformity hs.2⟩
comp := fun s hs ↦ by
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs.1 with ⟨tα, htα, Htα⟩
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs.2 with ⟨tβ, htβ, Htβ⟩
filter_upwards [mem_lift' (union_mem_sup (image_mem_map htα) (image_mem_map htβ))]
rintro ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨z, ⟨⟨a, b⟩, hab, ⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨⟨a, b⟩, hab, ⟨⟩⟩, ⟨⟨_, c⟩, hbc, ⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨⟨_, c⟩, hbc, ⟨⟩⟩⟩
exacts [@Htα (_, _) ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩, @Htβ (_, _) ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩]
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity x := by
ext
cases x <;> simp [mem_comap', -mem_comap, nhds_inl, nhds_inr, nhds_eq_comap_uniformity,
Prod.ext_iff]
/-- The union of an entourage of the diagonal in each set of a disjoint union is again an entourage
of the diagonal. -/
theorem union_mem_uniformity_sum {a : Set (α × α)} (ha : a ∈ 𝓤 α) {b : Set (β × β)} (hb : b ∈ 𝓤 β) :
Prod.map inl inl '' a ∪ Prod.map inr inr '' b ∈ 𝓤 (α ⊕ β) :=
union_mem_sup (image_mem_map ha) (image_mem_map hb)
theorem Sum.uniformity : 𝓤 (α ⊕ β) = map (Prod.map inl inl) (𝓤 α) ⊔ map (Prod.map inr inr) (𝓤 β) :=
rfl
lemma uniformContinuous_inl : UniformContinuous (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) := le_sup_left
lemma uniformContinuous_inr : UniformContinuous (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) := le_sup_right
instance [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 α)] [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 β)] :
IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 (α ⊕ β)) := by
rw [Sum.uniformity]
infer_instance
end Sum
end Constructions
/-!
### Expressing continuity properties in uniform spaces
We reformulate the various continuity properties of functions taking values in a uniform space
in terms of the uniformity in the target. Since the same lemmas (essentially with the same names)
also exist for metric spaces and emetric spaces (reformulating things in terms of the distance or
the edistance in the target), we put them in a namespace `Uniform` here.
In the metric and emetric space setting, there are also similar lemmas where one assumes that
both the source and the target are metric spaces, reformulating things in terms of the distance
on both sides. These lemmas are generally written without primes, and the versions where only
the target is a metric space is primed. We follow the same convention here, thus giving lemmas
with primes.
-/
namespace Uniform
variable [UniformSpace α]
theorem tendsto_nhds_right {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (a, u x)) f (𝓤 α) := by
rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
theorem tendsto_nhds_left {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (u x, a)) f (𝓤 α) := by
rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity', tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
theorem continuousAt_iff'_right [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} :
ContinuousAt f b ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f b, f x)) (𝓝 b) (𝓤 α) := by
| rw [ContinuousAt, tendsto_nhds_right]
theorem continuousAt_iff'_left [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} :
ContinuousAt f b ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f x, f b)) (𝓝 b) (𝓤 α) := by
rw [ContinuousAt, tendsto_nhds_left]
theorem continuousAt_iff_prod [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} :
ContinuousAt f b ↔ Tendsto (fun x : β × β => (f x.1, f x.2)) (𝓝 (b, b)) (𝓤 α) :=
⟨fun H => le_trans (H.prodMap' H) (nhds_le_uniformity _), fun H =>
continuousAt_iff'_left.2 <| H.comp <| tendsto_id.prodMk_nhds tendsto_const_nhds⟩
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean | 925 | 934 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Simon Hudon
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Braided.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.OfChosenFiniteProducts.Basic
/-!
# The symmetric monoidal structure on a category with chosen finite products.
-/
universe v u
namespace CategoryTheory
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] {X Y : C}
open CategoryTheory.Limits
variable (𝒯 : LimitCone (Functor.empty.{0} C))
variable (ℬ : ∀ X Y : C, LimitCone (pair X Y))
open MonoidalOfChosenFiniteProducts
namespace MonoidalOfChosenFiniteProducts
open MonoidalCategory
theorem braiding_naturality {X X' Y Y' : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X' ⟶ Y') :
tensorHom ℬ f g ≫ (Limits.BinaryFan.braiding (ℬ Y Y').isLimit (ℬ Y' Y).isLimit).hom =
(Limits.BinaryFan.braiding (ℬ X X').isLimit (ℬ X' X).isLimit).hom ≫ tensorHom ℬ g f := by
dsimp [tensorHom, Limits.BinaryFan.braiding]
apply (ℬ _ _).isLimit.hom_ext
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> · dsimp [Limits.IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso]; simp
theorem hexagon_forward (X Y Z : C) :
(BinaryFan.associatorOfLimitCone ℬ X Y Z).hom ≫
(Limits.BinaryFan.braiding (ℬ X (tensorObj ℬ Y Z)).isLimit
(ℬ (tensorObj ℬ Y Z) X).isLimit).hom ≫
(BinaryFan.associatorOfLimitCone ℬ Y Z X).hom =
tensorHom ℬ (Limits.BinaryFan.braiding (ℬ X Y).isLimit (ℬ Y X).isLimit).hom (𝟙 Z) ≫
(BinaryFan.associatorOfLimitCone ℬ Y X Z).hom ≫
tensorHom ℬ (𝟙 Y) (Limits.BinaryFan.braiding (ℬ X Z).isLimit (ℬ Z X).isLimit).hom := by
dsimp [tensorHom, Limits.BinaryFan.braiding]
apply (ℬ _ _).isLimit.hom_ext; rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩
· dsimp [Limits.IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso]; simp
· apply (ℬ _ _).isLimit.hom_ext
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> · dsimp [Limits.IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso]; simp
theorem hexagon_reverse (X Y Z : C) :
(BinaryFan.associatorOfLimitCone ℬ X Y Z).inv ≫
(Limits.BinaryFan.braiding (ℬ (tensorObj ℬ X Y) Z).isLimit
(ℬ Z (tensorObj ℬ X Y)).isLimit).hom ≫
| (BinaryFan.associatorOfLimitCone ℬ Z X Y).inv =
tensorHom ℬ (𝟙 X) (Limits.BinaryFan.braiding (ℬ Y Z).isLimit (ℬ Z Y).isLimit).hom ≫
(BinaryFan.associatorOfLimitCone ℬ X Z Y).inv ≫
tensorHom ℬ (Limits.BinaryFan.braiding (ℬ X Z).isLimit (ℬ Z X).isLimit).hom (𝟙 Y) := by
dsimp [tensorHom, Limits.BinaryFan.braiding]
apply (ℬ _ _).isLimit.hom_ext; rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩
· apply (ℬ _ _).isLimit.hom_ext
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;>
· dsimp [BinaryFan.associatorOfLimitCone, BinaryFan.associator,
Limits.IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso]
simp
· dsimp [BinaryFan.associatorOfLimitCone, BinaryFan.associator,
Limits.IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso]
simp
theorem symmetry (X Y : C) :
(Limits.BinaryFan.braiding (ℬ X Y).isLimit (ℬ Y X).isLimit).hom ≫
(Limits.BinaryFan.braiding (ℬ Y X).isLimit (ℬ X Y).isLimit).hom =
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/OfChosenFiniteProducts/Symmetric.lean | 57 | 74 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Equiv.TransferInstance
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.GroupCompletion
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Ring.Ideal
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.IsUniformGroup.Basic
/-!
# Completion of topological rings:
This files endows the completion of a topological ring with a ring structure.
More precisely the instance `UniformSpace.Completion.ring` builds a ring structure
on the completion of a ring endowed with a compatible uniform structure in the sense of
`IsUniformAddGroup`. There is also a commutative version when the original ring is commutative.
Moreover, if a topological ring is an algebra over a commutative semiring, then so is its
`UniformSpace.Completion`.
The last part of the file builds a ring structure on the biggest separated quotient of a ring.
## Main declarations:
Beyond the instances explained above (that don't have to be explicitly invoked),
the main constructions deal with continuous ring morphisms.
* `UniformSpace.Completion.extensionHom`: extends a continuous ring morphism from `R`
to a complete separated group `S` to `Completion R`.
* `UniformSpace.Completion.mapRingHom` : promotes a continuous ring morphism
from `R` to `S` into a continuous ring morphism from `Completion R` to `Completion S`.
TODO: Generalise the results here from the concrete `Completion` to any `AbstractCompletion`.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u
namespace UniformSpace.Completion
open IsDenseInducing UniformSpace Function
section one_and_mul
variable (α : Type*) [Ring α] [UniformSpace α]
instance one : One (Completion α) :=
⟨(1 : α)⟩
instance mul : Mul (Completion α) :=
⟨curry <| (isDenseInducing_coe.prodMap isDenseInducing_coe).extend ((↑) ∘ uncurry (· * ·))⟩
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_one : ((1 : α) : Completion α) = 1 :=
rfl
end one_and_mul
variable {α : Type*} [Ring α] [UniformSpace α] [IsTopologicalRing α]
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul (a b : α) : ((a * b : α) : Completion α) = a * b :=
((isDenseInducing_coe.prodMap isDenseInducing_coe).extend_eq
((continuous_coe α).comp (@continuous_mul α _ _ _)) (a, b)).symm
variable [IsUniformAddGroup α]
instance : ContinuousMul (Completion α) where
continuous_mul := by
let m := (AddMonoidHom.mul : α →+ α →+ α).compr₂ toCompl
have : Continuous fun p : α × α => m p.1 p.2 := (continuous_coe α).comp continuous_mul
have di : IsDenseInducing (toCompl : α → Completion α) := isDenseInducing_coe
exact (di.extend_Z_bilin di this :)
@[deprecated _root_.continuous_mul (since := "2024-12-21")]
protected theorem continuous_mul : Continuous fun p : Completion α × Completion α => p.1 * p.2 :=
_root_.continuous_mul
@[deprecated _root_.Continuous.mul (since := "2024-12-21")]
protected theorem Continuous.mul {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] {f g : β → Completion α}
(hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun b => f b * g b :=
hf.mul hg
instance ring : Ring (Completion α) :=
{ AddMonoidWithOne.unary, (inferInstanceAs (AddCommGroup (Completion α))),
(inferInstanceAs (Mul (Completion α))), (inferInstanceAs (One (Completion α))) with
zero_mul := fun a =>
Completion.induction_on a
(isClosed_eq (continuous_const.mul continuous_id) continuous_const)
fun a => by rw [← coe_zero, ← coe_mul, zero_mul]
mul_zero := fun a =>
Completion.induction_on a
(isClosed_eq (continuous_id.mul continuous_const) continuous_const)
fun a => by rw [← coe_zero, ← coe_mul, mul_zero]
one_mul := fun a =>
Completion.induction_on a
(isClosed_eq (continuous_const.mul continuous_id) continuous_id) fun a => by
rw [← coe_one, ← coe_mul, one_mul]
mul_one := fun a =>
Completion.induction_on a
(isClosed_eq (continuous_id.mul continuous_const) continuous_id) fun a => by
rw [← coe_one, ← coe_mul, mul_one]
mul_assoc := fun a b c =>
Completion.induction_on₃ a b c
(isClosed_eq
((continuous_fst.mul (continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd)).mul
(continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd))
(continuous_fst.mul
((continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd).mul
(continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd))))
fun a b c => by rw [← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, mul_assoc]
left_distrib := fun a b c =>
Completion.induction_on₃ a b c
(isClosed_eq
(continuous_fst.mul
(Continuous.add (continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd)
(continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd)))
(Continuous.add (continuous_fst.mul (continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd))
(continuous_fst.mul (continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd))))
fun a b c => by rw [← coe_add, ← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, ← coe_add, mul_add]
right_distrib := fun a b c =>
Completion.induction_on₃ a b c
(isClosed_eq
((Continuous.add continuous_fst (continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd)).mul
(continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd))
(Continuous.add (continuous_fst.mul (continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd))
((continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd).mul
(continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd))))
fun a b c => by rw [← coe_add, ← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, ← coe_add, add_mul] }
/-- The map from a uniform ring to its completion, as a ring homomorphism. -/
def coeRingHom : α →+* Completion α where
toFun := (↑)
map_one' := coe_one α
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
map_mul' := coe_mul
theorem continuous_coeRingHom : Continuous (coeRingHom : α → Completion α) :=
continuous_coe α
variable {β : Type u} [UniformSpace β] [Ring β] [IsUniformAddGroup β] [IsTopologicalRing β]
(f : α →+* β) (hf : Continuous f)
/-- The completion extension as a ring morphism. -/
def extensionHom [CompleteSpace β] [T0Space β] : Completion α →+* β :=
have hf' : Continuous (f : α →+ β) := hf
-- helping the elaborator
have hf : UniformContinuous f := uniformContinuous_addMonoidHom_of_continuous hf'
{ toFun := Completion.extension f
map_zero' := by simp_rw [← coe_zero, extension_coe hf, f.map_zero]
map_add' := fun a b =>
Completion.induction_on₂ a b
(isClosed_eq (continuous_extension.comp continuous_add)
((continuous_extension.comp continuous_fst).add
(continuous_extension.comp continuous_snd)))
fun a b => by
simp_rw [← coe_add, extension_coe hf, f.map_add]
map_one' := by rw [← coe_one, extension_coe hf, f.map_one]
map_mul' := fun a b =>
Completion.induction_on₂ a b
(isClosed_eq (continuous_extension.comp continuous_mul)
((continuous_extension.comp continuous_fst).mul
(continuous_extension.comp continuous_snd)))
fun a b => by
simp_rw [← coe_mul, extension_coe hf, f.map_mul] }
theorem extensionHom_coe [CompleteSpace β] [T0Space β] (a : α) :
Completion.extensionHom f hf a = f a := by
simp only [Completion.extensionHom, RingHom.coe_mk, MonoidHom.coe_mk, OneHom.coe_mk,
UniformSpace.Completion.extension_coe <| uniformContinuous_addMonoidHom_of_continuous hf]
instance topologicalRing : IsTopologicalRing (Completion α) where
continuous_add := continuous_add
continuous_mul := continuous_mul
/-- The completion map as a ring morphism. -/
def mapRingHom (hf : Continuous f) : Completion α →+* Completion β :=
extensionHom (coeRingHom.comp f) (continuous_coeRingHom.comp hf)
section Algebra
variable (A : Type*) [Ring A] [UniformSpace A] [IsUniformAddGroup A] [IsTopologicalRing A]
(R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Algebra R A] [UniformContinuousConstSMul R A]
@[simp]
theorem map_smul_eq_mul_coe (r : R) :
Completion.map (r • ·) = ((algebraMap R A r : Completion A) * ·) := by
ext x
refine Completion.induction_on x ?_ fun a => ?_
· exact isClosed_eq Completion.continuous_map (continuous_mul_left _)
· simp_rw [map_coe (uniformContinuous_const_smul r) a, Algebra.smul_def, coe_mul]
instance algebra : Algebra R (Completion A) where
algebraMap := (UniformSpace.Completion.coeRingHom : A →+* Completion A).comp (algebraMap R A)
commutes' := fun r x =>
Completion.induction_on x (isClosed_eq (continuous_mul_left _) (continuous_mul_right _))
fun a => by
simpa only [coe_mul] using congr_arg ((↑) : A → Completion A) (Algebra.commutes r a)
smul_def' := fun r x => congr_fun (map_smul_eq_mul_coe A R r) x
theorem algebraMap_def (r : R) :
algebraMap R (Completion A) r = (algebraMap R A r : Completion A) :=
rfl
end Algebra
section CommRing
variable (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [UniformSpace R] [IsUniformAddGroup R] [IsTopologicalRing R]
instance commRing : CommRing (Completion R) :=
{ Completion.ring with
mul_comm := fun a b =>
Completion.induction_on₂ a b
(isClosed_eq (continuous_fst.mul continuous_snd) (continuous_snd.mul continuous_fst))
fun a b => by rw [← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, mul_comm] }
/-- A shortcut instance for the common case -/
instance algebra' : Algebra R (Completion R) := by infer_instance
end CommRing
end UniformSpace.Completion
namespace UniformSpace
variable {α : Type*}
-- TODO: move (some of) these results to the file about topological rings
theorem inseparableSetoid_ring (α) [Ring α] [TopologicalSpace α] [IsTopologicalRing α] :
inseparableSetoid α = Submodule.quotientRel (Ideal.closure ⊥) :=
Setoid.ext fun x y =>
addGroup_inseparable_iff.trans <| .trans (by rfl) (Submodule.quotientRel_def _).symm
/-- Given a topological ring `α` equipped with a uniform structure that makes subtraction uniformly
continuous, get an homeomorphism between the separated quotient of `α` and the quotient ring
corresponding to the closure of zero. -/
def sepQuotHomeomorphRingQuot (α) [CommRing α] [TopologicalSpace α] [IsTopologicalRing α] :
SeparationQuotient α ≃ₜ α ⧸ (⊥ : Ideal α).closure where
toEquiv := Quotient.congrRight fun x y => by rw [inseparableSetoid_ring]
continuous_toFun := continuous_id.quotient_map' <| by
rw [inseparableSetoid_ring]; exact fun _ _ ↦ id
continuous_invFun := continuous_id.quotient_map' <| by
rw [inseparableSetoid_ring]; exact fun _ _ ↦ id
instance commRing [CommRing α] [TopologicalSpace α] [IsTopologicalRing α] :
CommRing (SeparationQuotient α) :=
(sepQuotHomeomorphRingQuot _).commRing
/-- Given a topological ring `α` equipped with a uniform structure that makes subtraction uniformly
continuous, get an equivalence between the separated quotient of `α` and the quotient ring
| corresponding to the closure of zero. -/
def sepQuotRingEquivRingQuot (α) [CommRing α] [TopologicalSpace α] [IsTopologicalRing α] :
SeparationQuotient α ≃+* α ⧸ (⊥ : Ideal α).closure :=
(sepQuotHomeomorphRingQuot _).ringEquiv
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/UniformRing.lean | 253 | 256 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.CoprodI
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Coprod.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Complement
/-!
## Pushouts of Monoids and Groups
This file defines wide pushouts of monoids and groups and proves some properties
of the amalgamated product of groups (i.e. the special case where all the maps
in the diagram are injective).
## Main definitions
- `Monoid.PushoutI`: the pushout of a diagram of monoids indexed by a type `ι`
- `Monoid.PushoutI.base`: the map from the amalgamating monoid to the pushout
- `Monoid.PushoutI.of`: the map from each Monoid in the family to the pushout
- `Monoid.PushoutI.lift`: the universal property used to define homomorphisms out of the pushout.
- `Monoid.PushoutI.NormalWord`: a normal form for words in the pushout
- `Monoid.PushoutI.of_injective`: if all the maps in the diagram are injective in a pushout of
groups then so is `of`
- `Monoid.PushoutI.Reduced.eq_empty_of_mem_range`: For any word `w` in the coproduct,
if `w` is reduced (i.e none its letters are in the image of the base monoid), and nonempty, then
`w` itself is not in the image of the base monoid.
## References
* The normal form theorem follows these [notes](https://webspace.maths.qmul.ac.uk/i.m.chiswell/ggt/lecture_notes/lecture2.pdf)
from Queen Mary University
## Tags
amalgamated product, pushout, group
-/
namespace Monoid
open CoprodI Subgroup Coprod Function List
variable {ι : Type*} {G : ι → Type*} {H : Type*} {K : Type*} [Monoid K]
/-- The relation we quotient by to form the pushout -/
def PushoutI.con [∀ i, Monoid (G i)] [Monoid H] (φ : ∀ i, H →* G i) :
Con (Coprod (CoprodI G) H) :=
conGen (fun x y : Coprod (CoprodI G) H =>
∃ i x', x = inl (of (φ i x')) ∧ y = inr x')
/-- The indexed pushout of monoids, which is the pushout in the category of monoids,
or the category of groups. -/
def PushoutI [∀ i, Monoid (G i)] [Monoid H] (φ : ∀ i, H →* G i) : Type _ :=
(PushoutI.con φ).Quotient
namespace PushoutI
section Monoid
variable [∀ i, Monoid (G i)] [Monoid H] {φ : ∀ i, H →* G i}
protected instance mul : Mul (PushoutI φ) := by
delta PushoutI; infer_instance
protected instance one : One (PushoutI φ) := by
delta PushoutI; infer_instance
instance monoid : Monoid (PushoutI φ) :=
{ Con.monoid _ with
toMul := PushoutI.mul
toOne := PushoutI.one }
/-- The map from each indexing group into the pushout -/
def of (i : ι) : G i →* PushoutI φ :=
(Con.mk' _).comp <| inl.comp CoprodI.of
variable (φ) in
/-- The map from the base monoid into the pushout -/
def base : H →* PushoutI φ :=
(Con.mk' _).comp inr
theorem of_comp_eq_base (i : ι) : (of i).comp (φ i) = (base φ) := by
ext x
apply (Con.eq _).2
refine ConGen.Rel.of _ _ ?_
simp only [MonoidHom.comp_apply, Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_range]
exact ⟨_, _, rfl, rfl⟩
variable (φ) in
theorem of_apply_eq_base (i : ι) (x : H) : of i (φ i x) = base φ x := by
rw [← MonoidHom.comp_apply, of_comp_eq_base]
/-- Define a homomorphism out of the pushout of monoids be defining it on each object in the
diagram -/
def lift (f : ∀ i, G i →* K) (k : H →* K)
(hf : ∀ i, (f i).comp (φ i) = k) :
PushoutI φ →* K :=
Con.lift _ (Coprod.lift (CoprodI.lift f) k) <| by
apply Con.conGen_le fun x y => ?_
rintro ⟨i, x', rfl, rfl⟩
simp only [DFunLike.ext_iff, MonoidHom.coe_comp, comp_apply] at hf
simp [hf]
@[simp]
theorem lift_of (f : ∀ i, G i →* K) (k : H →* K)
(hf : ∀ i, (f i).comp (φ i) = k)
{i : ι} (g : G i) : (lift f k hf) (of i g : PushoutI φ) = f i g := by
delta PushoutI lift of
simp only [MonoidHom.coe_comp, Con.coe_mk', comp_apply, Con.lift_coe,
lift_apply_inl, CoprodI.lift_of]
@[simp]
theorem lift_base (f : ∀ i, G i →* K) (k : H →* K)
(hf : ∀ i, (f i).comp (φ i) = k)
(g : H) : (lift f k hf) (base φ g : PushoutI φ) = k g := by
delta PushoutI lift base
simp only [MonoidHom.coe_comp, Con.coe_mk', comp_apply, Con.lift_coe, lift_apply_inr]
-- `ext` attribute should be lower priority then `hom_ext_nonempty`
@[ext 1199]
theorem hom_ext {f g : PushoutI φ →* K}
(h : ∀ i, f.comp (of i : G i →* _) = g.comp (of i : G i →* _))
(hbase : f.comp (base φ) = g.comp (base φ)) : f = g :=
(MonoidHom.cancel_right Con.mk'_surjective).mp <|
Coprod.hom_ext
(CoprodI.ext_hom _ _ h)
hbase
@[ext high]
theorem hom_ext_nonempty [hn : Nonempty ι]
{f g : PushoutI φ →* K}
(h : ∀ i, f.comp (of i : G i →* _) = g.comp (of i : G i →* _)) : f = g :=
hom_ext h <| by
cases hn with
| intro i =>
ext
rw [← of_comp_eq_base i, ← MonoidHom.comp_assoc, h, MonoidHom.comp_assoc]
/-- The equivalence that is part of the universal property of the pushout. A hom out of
the pushout is just a morphism out of all groups in the pushout that satisfies a commutativity
condition. -/
@[simps]
def homEquiv :
(PushoutI φ →* K) ≃ { f : (Π i, G i →* K) × (H →* K) // ∀ i, (f.1 i).comp (φ i) = f.2 } :=
{ toFun := fun f => ⟨(fun i => f.comp (of i), f.comp (base φ)),
fun i => by rw [MonoidHom.comp_assoc, of_comp_eq_base]⟩
invFun := fun f => lift f.1.1 f.1.2 f.2,
left_inv := fun _ => hom_ext (by simp [DFunLike.ext_iff])
(by simp [DFunLike.ext_iff])
right_inv := fun ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩ => by simp [DFunLike.ext_iff, funext_iff] }
/-- The map from the coproduct into the pushout -/
def ofCoprodI : CoprodI G →* PushoutI φ :=
CoprodI.lift of
@[simp]
theorem ofCoprodI_of (i : ι) (g : G i) :
(ofCoprodI (CoprodI.of g) : PushoutI φ) = of i g := by
simp [ofCoprodI]
theorem induction_on {motive : PushoutI φ → Prop}
(x : PushoutI φ)
(of : ∀ (i : ι) (g : G i), motive (of i g))
(base : ∀ h, motive (base φ h))
(mul : ∀ x y, motive x → motive y → motive (x * y)) : motive x := by
delta PushoutI PushoutI.of PushoutI.base at *
induction x using Con.induction_on with
| H x =>
induction x using Coprod.induction_on with
| inl g =>
induction g using CoprodI.induction_on with
| of i g => exact of i g
| mul x y ihx ihy =>
rw [map_mul]
exact mul _ _ ihx ihy
| one => simpa using base 1
| inr h => exact base h
| mul x y ihx ihy => exact mul _ _ ihx ihy
end Monoid
variable [∀ i, Group (G i)] [Group H] {φ : ∀ i, H →* G i}
instance : Group (PushoutI φ) :=
{ Con.group (PushoutI.con φ) with
toMonoid := PushoutI.monoid }
namespace NormalWord
/-
In this section we show that there is a normal form for words in the amalgamated product. To have a
normal form, we need to pick canonical choice of element of each right coset of the base group. The
choice of element in the base group itself is `1`. Given a choice of element of each right coset,
given by the type `Transversal φ` we can find a normal form. The normal form for an element is an
element of the base group, multiplied by a word in the coproduct, where each letter in the word is
the canonical choice of element of its coset. We then show that all groups in the diagram act
faithfully on the normal form. This implies that the maps into the coproduct are injective.
We demonstrate the action is faithful using the equivalence `equivPair`. We show that `G i` acts
faithfully on `Pair d i` and that `Pair d i` is isomorphic to `NormalWord d`. Here, `d` is a
`Transversal`. A `Pair d i` is a word in the coproduct, `Coprod G`, the `tail`, and an element
of the group `G i`, the `head`. The first letter of the `tail` must not be an element of `G i`.
Note that the `head` may be `1` Every letter in the `tail` must be in the transversal given by `d`.
We then show that the equivalence between `NormalWord` and `PushoutI`, between the set of normal
words and the elements of the amalgamated product. The key to this is the theorem `prod_smul_empty`,
which says that going from `NormalWord` to `PushoutI` and back is the identity. This is proven
by induction on the word using `consRecOn`.
-/
variable (φ)
/-- The data we need to pick a normal form for words in the pushout. We need to pick a
canonical element of each coset. We also need all the maps in the diagram to be injective -/
structure Transversal : Type _ where
/-- All maps in the diagram are injective -/
injective : ∀ i, Injective (φ i)
/-- The underlying set, containing exactly one element of each coset of the base group -/
set : ∀ i, Set (G i)
/-- The chosen element of the base group itself is the identity -/
one_mem : ∀ i, 1 ∈ set i
/-- We have exactly one element of each coset of the base group -/
compl : ∀ i, IsComplement (φ i).range (set i)
theorem transversal_nonempty (hφ : ∀ i, Injective (φ i)) : Nonempty (Transversal φ) := by
choose t ht using fun i => (φ i).range.exists_isComplement_right 1
apply Nonempty.intro
exact
{ injective := hφ
set := t
one_mem := fun i => (ht i).2
compl := fun i => (ht i).1 }
variable {φ}
/-- The normal form for words in the pushout. Every element of the pushout is the product of an
element of the base group and a word made up of letters each of which is in the transversal. -/
structure _root_.Monoid.PushoutI.NormalWord (d : Transversal φ) extends CoprodI.Word G where
/-- Every `NormalWord` is the product of an element of the base group and a word made up
of letters each of which is in the transversal. `head` is that element of the base group. -/
head : H
/-- All letter in the word are in the transversal. -/
normalized : ∀ i g, ⟨i, g⟩ ∈ toList → g ∈ d.set i
/--
A `Pair d i` is a word in the coproduct, `Coprod G`, the `tail`, and an element of the group `G i`,
the `head`. The first letter of the `tail` must not be an element of `G i`.
Note that the `head` may be `1` Every letter in the `tail` must be in the transversal given by `d`.
Similar to `Monoid.CoprodI.Pair` except every letter must be in the transversal
(not including the head letter). -/
structure Pair (d : Transversal φ) (i : ι) extends CoprodI.Word.Pair G i where
/-- All letters in the word are in the transversal. -/
normalized : ∀ i g, ⟨i, g⟩ ∈ tail.toList → g ∈ d.set i
variable {d : Transversal φ}
/-- The empty normalized word, representing the identity element of the group. -/
@[simps!]
def empty : NormalWord d := ⟨CoprodI.Word.empty, 1, fun i g => by simp [CoprodI.Word.empty]⟩
instance : Inhabited (NormalWord d) := ⟨NormalWord.empty⟩
instance (i : ι) : Inhabited (Pair d i) :=
⟨{ (empty : NormalWord d) with
head := 1, tail := _,
fstIdx_ne := fun h => by cases h }⟩
@[ext]
theorem ext {w₁ w₂ : NormalWord d} (hhead : w₁.head = w₂.head)
(hlist : w₁.toList = w₂.toList) : w₁ = w₂ := by
rcases w₁ with ⟨⟨_, _, _⟩, _, _⟩
rcases w₂ with ⟨⟨_, _, _⟩, _, _⟩
simp_all
open Subgroup.IsComplement
instance baseAction : MulAction H (NormalWord d) :=
{ smul := fun h w => { w with head := h * w.head },
one_smul := by simp [instHSMul]
mul_smul := by simp [instHSMul, mul_assoc] }
theorem base_smul_def' (h : H) (w : NormalWord d) :
h • w = { w with head := h * w.head } := rfl
/-- Take the product of a normal word as an element of the `PushoutI`. We show that this is
bijective, in `NormalWord.equiv`. -/
def prod (w : NormalWord d) : PushoutI φ :=
base φ w.head * ofCoprodI (w.toWord).prod
@[simp]
theorem prod_base_smul (h : H) (w : NormalWord d) :
(h • w).prod = base φ h * w.prod := by
simp only [base_smul_def', prod, map_mul, mul_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem prod_empty : (empty : NormalWord d).prod = 1 := by
simp [prod, empty]
/-- A constructor that multiplies a `NormalWord` by an element, with condition to make
sure the underlying list does get longer. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def cons {i} (g : G i) (w : NormalWord d) (hmw : w.fstIdx ≠ some i)
(hgr : g ∉ (φ i).range) : NormalWord d :=
letI n := (d.compl i).equiv (g * (φ i w.head))
letI w' := Word.cons (n.2 : G i) w.toWord hmw
(mt (coe_equiv_snd_eq_one_iff_mem _ (d.one_mem _)).1
(mt (mul_mem_cancel_right (by simp)).1 hgr))
{ toWord := w'
head := (MonoidHom.ofInjective (d.injective i)).symm n.1
normalized := fun i g hg => by
simp only [w', Word.cons, mem_cons, Sigma.mk.inj_iff] at hg
rcases hg with ⟨rfl, hg | hg⟩
· simp
· exact w.normalized _ _ (by assumption) }
@[simp]
theorem prod_cons {i} (g : G i) (w : NormalWord d) (hmw : w.fstIdx ≠ some i)
(hgr : g ∉ (φ i).range) : (cons g w hmw hgr).prod = of i g * w.prod := by
simp [prod, cons, ← of_apply_eq_base φ i, equiv_fst_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc]
variable [DecidableEq ι] [∀ i, DecidableEq (G i)]
/-- Given a word in `CoprodI`, if every letter is in the transversal and when
we multiply by an element of the base group it still has this property,
then the element of the base group we multiplied by was one. -/
theorem eq_one_of_smul_normalized (w : CoprodI.Word G) {i : ι} (h : H)
(hw : ∀ i g, ⟨i, g⟩ ∈ w.toList → g ∈ d.set i)
(hφw : ∀ j g, ⟨j, g⟩ ∈ (CoprodI.of (φ i h) • w).toList → g ∈ d.set j) :
h = 1 := by
simp only [← (d.compl _).equiv_snd_eq_self_iff_mem (one_mem _)] at hw hφw
have hhead : ((d.compl i).equiv (Word.equivPair i w).head).2 =
(Word.equivPair i w).head := by
rw [Word.equivPair_head]
split_ifs with h
· rcases h with ⟨_, rfl⟩
exact hw _ _ (List.head_mem _)
· rw [equiv_one (d.compl i) (one_mem _) (d.one_mem _)]
by_contra hh1
have := hφw i (φ i h * (Word.equivPair i w).head) ?_
· apply hh1
rw [equiv_mul_left_of_mem (d.compl i) ⟨_, rfl⟩, hhead] at this
simpa [((injective_iff_map_eq_one' _).1 (d.injective i))] using this
· simp only [Word.mem_smul_iff, not_true, false_and, ne_eq, Option.mem_def, mul_right_inj,
exists_eq_right', mul_eq_left, exists_prop, true_and, false_or]
constructor
· intro h
apply_fun (d.compl i).equiv at h
simp only [Prod.ext_iff, equiv_one (d.compl i) (one_mem _) (d.one_mem _),
equiv_mul_left_of_mem (d.compl i) ⟨_, rfl⟩ , hhead, Subtype.ext_iff,
Prod.ext_iff, Subgroup.coe_mul] at h
rcases h with ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
rw [h₂, equiv_one (d.compl i) (one_mem _) (d.one_mem _)] at h₁
erw [mul_one] at h₁
simp only [((injective_iff_map_eq_one' _).1 (d.injective i))] at h₁
contradiction
· rw [Word.equivPair_head]
dsimp
split_ifs with hep
· rcases hep with ⟨hnil, rfl⟩
rw [head?_eq_head hnil]
simp_all
· push_neg at hep
by_cases hw : w.toList = []
· simp [hw, Word.fstIdx]
· simp [head?_eq_head hw, Word.fstIdx, hep hw]
theorem ext_smul {w₁ w₂ : NormalWord d} (i : ι)
(h : CoprodI.of (φ i w₁.head) • w₁.toWord =
CoprodI.of (φ i w₂.head) • w₂.toWord) :
w₁ = w₂ := by
rcases w₁ with ⟨w₁, h₁, hw₁⟩
rcases w₂ with ⟨w₂, h₂, hw₂⟩
dsimp at *
rw [smul_eq_iff_eq_inv_smul, ← mul_smul] at h
subst h
simp only [← map_inv, ← map_mul] at hw₁
have : h₁⁻¹ * h₂ = 1 := eq_one_of_smul_normalized w₂ (h₁⁻¹ * h₂) hw₂ hw₁
rw [inv_mul_eq_one] at this; subst this
simp
/-- Given a pair `(head, tail)`, we can form a word by prepending `head` to `tail`, but
putting head into normal form first, by making sure it is expressed as an element
of the base group multiplied by an element of the transversal. -/
noncomputable def rcons (i : ι) (p : Pair d i) : NormalWord d :=
letI n := (d.compl i).equiv p.head
let w := (Word.equivPair i).symm { p.toPair with head := n.2 }
{ toWord := w
head := (MonoidHom.ofInjective (d.injective i)).symm n.1
normalized := fun i g hg => by
dsimp [w] at hg
rw [Word.equivPair_symm, Word.mem_rcons_iff] at hg
rcases hg with hg | ⟨_, rfl, rfl⟩
· exact p.normalized _ _ hg
· simp }
theorem rcons_injective {i : ι} : Function.Injective (rcons (d := d) i) := by
rintro ⟨⟨head₁, tail₁⟩, _⟩ ⟨⟨head₂, tail₂⟩, _⟩
simp only [rcons, NormalWord.mk.injEq, EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq,
Word.Pair.mk.injEq, Pair.mk.injEq, and_imp]
intro h₁ h₂ h₃
subst h₂
rw [← equiv_fst_mul_equiv_snd (d.compl i) head₁,
← equiv_fst_mul_equiv_snd (d.compl i) head₂,
h₁, h₃]
simp
/-- The equivalence between `NormalWord`s and pairs. We can turn a `NormalWord` into a
pair by taking the head of the `List` if it is in `G i` and multiplying it by the element of the
base group. -/
noncomputable def equivPair (i) : NormalWord d ≃ Pair d i :=
letI toFun : NormalWord d → Pair d i :=
fun w =>
letI p := Word.equivPair i (CoprodI.of (φ i w.head) • w.toWord)
{ toPair := p
normalized := fun j g hg => by
dsimp only [p] at hg
rw [Word.of_smul_def, ← Word.equivPair_symm, Equiv.apply_symm_apply] at hg
dsimp at hg
exact w.normalized _ _ (Word.mem_of_mem_equivPair_tail _ hg) }
haveI leftInv : Function.LeftInverse (rcons i) toFun :=
fun w => ext_smul i <| by
simp only [toFun, rcons, Word.equivPair_symm,
Word.equivPair_smul_same, Word.equivPair_tail_eq_inv_smul, Word.rcons_eq_smul,
MonoidHom.apply_ofInjective_symm, equiv_fst_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, map_mul, map_inv,
mul_smul, inv_smul_smul, smul_inv_smul]
{ toFun := toFun
invFun := rcons i
left_inv := leftInv
right_inv := fun _ => rcons_injective (leftInv _) }
noncomputable instance summandAction (i : ι) : MulAction (G i) (NormalWord d) :=
{ smul := fun g w => (equivPair i).symm
{ equivPair i w with
head := g * (equivPair i w).head }
one_smul := fun _ => by
dsimp [instHSMul]
rw [one_mul]
exact (equivPair i).symm_apply_apply _
mul_smul := fun _ _ _ => by
dsimp [instHSMul]
simp [mul_assoc, Equiv.apply_symm_apply, Function.End.mul_def] }
theorem summand_smul_def' {i : ι} (g : G i) (w : NormalWord d) :
g • w = (equivPair i).symm
{ equivPair i w with
head := g * (equivPair i w).head } := rfl
noncomputable instance mulAction : MulAction (PushoutI φ) (NormalWord d) :=
MulAction.ofEndHom <|
lift
(fun _ => MulAction.toEndHom)
MulAction.toEndHom <| by
intro i
simp only [MulAction.toEndHom, DFunLike.ext_iff, MonoidHom.coe_comp, MonoidHom.coe_mk,
OneHom.coe_mk, comp_apply]
intro h
funext w
apply NormalWord.ext_smul i
simp only [summand_smul_def', equivPair, rcons, Word.equivPair_symm, Equiv.coe_fn_mk,
Equiv.coe_fn_symm_mk, Word.equivPair_smul_same, Word.equivPair_tail_eq_inv_smul,
Word.rcons_eq_smul, equiv_fst_eq_mul_inv, map_mul, map_inv, mul_smul, inv_smul_smul,
smul_inv_smul, base_smul_def', MonoidHom.apply_ofInjective_symm]
theorem base_smul_def (h : H) (w : NormalWord d) :
base φ h • w = { w with head := h * w.head } := by
dsimp [NormalWord.mulAction, instHSMul, SMul.smul]
rw [lift_base]
rfl
theorem summand_smul_def {i : ι} (g : G i) (w : NormalWord d) :
of (φ := φ) i g • w = (equivPair i).symm
{ equivPair i w with
head := g * (equivPair i w).head } := by
dsimp [NormalWord.mulAction, instHSMul, SMul.smul]
rw [lift_of]
rfl
theorem of_smul_eq_smul {i : ι} (g : G i) (w : NormalWord d) :
of (φ := φ) i g • w = g • w := by
rw [summand_smul_def, summand_smul_def']
theorem base_smul_eq_smul (h : H) (w : NormalWord d) :
base φ h • w = h • w := by
rw [base_smul_def, base_smul_def']
/-- Induction principle for `NormalWord`, that corresponds closely to inducting on
the underlying list. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
noncomputable def consRecOn {motive : NormalWord d → Sort _} (w : NormalWord d)
(empty : motive empty)
(cons : ∀ (i : ι) (g : G i) (w : NormalWord d) (hmw : w.fstIdx ≠ some i)
(_hgn : g ∈ d.set i) (hgr : g ∉ (φ i).range) (_hw1 : w.head = 1),
motive w → motive (cons g w hmw hgr))
(base : ∀ (h : H) (w : NormalWord d), w.head = 1 → motive w → motive
(base φ h • w)) : motive w := by
rcases w with ⟨w, head, h3⟩
convert base head ⟨w, 1, h3⟩ rfl ?_
· simp [base_smul_def]
· induction w using Word.consRecOn with
| empty => exact empty
| cons i g w h1 hg1 ih =>
convert cons i g ⟨w, 1, fun _ _ h => h3 _ _ (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ h)⟩
h1 (h3 _ _ List.mem_cons_self) ?_ rfl
(ih ?_)
· ext
simp only [Word.cons, Option.mem_def, NormalWord.cons, map_one, mul_one,
(equiv_snd_eq_self_iff_mem (d.compl i) (one_mem _)).2
(h3 _ _ List.mem_cons_self)]
· apply d.injective i
simp only [NormalWord.cons, equiv_fst_eq_mul_inv, MonoidHom.apply_ofInjective_symm,
map_one, mul_one, mul_inv_cancel, (equiv_snd_eq_self_iff_mem (d.compl i) (one_mem _)).2
(h3 _ _ List.mem_cons_self)]
· rwa [← SetLike.mem_coe,
← coe_equiv_snd_eq_one_iff_mem (d.compl i) (d.one_mem _),
(equiv_snd_eq_self_iff_mem (d.compl i) (one_mem _)).2
(h3 _ _ List.mem_cons_self)]
theorem cons_eq_smul {i : ι} (g : G i)
(w : NormalWord d) (hmw : w.fstIdx ≠ some i)
(hgr : g ∉ (φ i).range) : cons g w hmw hgr = of (φ := φ) i g • w := by
apply ext_smul i
simp only [cons, ne_eq, Word.cons_eq_smul, MonoidHom.apply_ofInjective_symm,
equiv_fst_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, map_mul, map_inv, mul_smul, inv_smul_smul, summand_smul_def,
equivPair, rcons, Word.equivPair_symm, Word.rcons_eq_smul, Equiv.coe_fn_mk,
Word.equivPair_tail_eq_inv_smul, Equiv.coe_fn_symm_mk, smul_inv_smul]
@[simp]
theorem prod_summand_smul {i : ι} (g : G i) (w : NormalWord d) :
(g • w).prod = of i g * w.prod := by
simp only [prod, summand_smul_def', equivPair, rcons, Word.equivPair_symm,
Equiv.coe_fn_mk, Equiv.coe_fn_symm_mk, Word.equivPair_smul_same,
Word.equivPair_tail_eq_inv_smul, Word.rcons_eq_smul, ← of_apply_eq_base φ i,
MonoidHom.apply_ofInjective_symm, equiv_fst_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, map_mul, map_inv,
Word.prod_smul, ofCoprodI_of, inv_mul_cancel_left, mul_inv_cancel_left]
@[simp]
theorem prod_smul (g : PushoutI φ) (w : NormalWord d) :
(g • w).prod = g * w.prod := by
| induction g using PushoutI.induction_on generalizing w with
| of i g => rw [of_smul_eq_smul, prod_summand_smul]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/PushoutI.lean | 544 | 545 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Reid Barton. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Reid Barton, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.FiniteLimits
/-!
# Filtered categories
A category is filtered if every finite diagram admits a cocone.
We give a simple characterisation of this condition as
1. for every pair of objects there exists another object "to the right",
2. for every pair of parallel morphisms there exists a morphism to the right so the compositions
are equal, and
3. there exists some object.
Filtered colimits are often better behaved than arbitrary colimits.
See `CategoryTheory/Limits/Types` for some details.
Filtered categories are nice because colimits indexed by filtered categories tend to be
easier to describe than general colimits (and more often preserved by functors).
In this file we show that any functor from a finite category to a filtered category admits a cocone:
* `cocone_nonempty [FinCategory J] [IsFiltered C] (F : J ⥤ C) : Nonempty (Cocone F)`
More generally,
for any finite collection of objects and morphisms between them in a filtered category
(even if not closed under composition) there exists some object `Z` receiving maps from all of them,
so that all the triangles (one edge from the finite set, two from morphisms to `Z`) commute.
This formulation is often more useful in practice and is available via `sup_exists`,
which takes a finset of objects, and an indexed family (indexed by source and target)
of finsets of morphisms.
We also prove the converse of `cocone_nonempty` as `of_cocone_nonempty`.
Furthermore, we give special support for two diagram categories: The `bowtie` and the `tulip`.
This is because these shapes show up in the proofs that forgetful functors of algebraic categories
(e.g. `MonCat`, `CommRingCat`, ...) preserve filtered colimits.
All of the above API, except for the `bowtie` and the `tulip`, is also provided for cofiltered
categories.
## See also
In `CategoryTheory.Limits.FilteredColimitCommutesFiniteLimit` we show that filtered colimits
commute with finite limits.
There is another characterization of filtered categories, namely that whenever `F : J ⥤ C` is a
functor from a finite category, there is `X : C` such that `Nonempty (limit (F.op ⋙ yoneda.obj X))`.
This is shown in `CategoryTheory.Limits.Filtered`.
-/
open Function
-- declare the `v`'s first; see `CategoryTheory.Category` for an explanation
universe w v v₁ v₂ u u₁ u₂
namespace CategoryTheory
variable (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C]
/-- A category `IsFilteredOrEmpty` if
1. for every pair of objects there exists another object "to the right", and
2. for every pair of parallel morphisms there exists a morphism to the right so the compositions
are equal.
-/
class IsFilteredOrEmpty : Prop where
/-- for every pair of objects there exists another object "to the right" -/
cocone_objs : ∀ X Y : C, ∃ (Z : _) (_ : X ⟶ Z) (_ : Y ⟶ Z), True
/-- for every pair of parallel morphisms there exists a morphism to the right
so the compositions are equal -/
cocone_maps : ∀ ⦃X Y : C⦄ (f g : X ⟶ Y), ∃ (Z : _) (h : Y ⟶ Z), f ≫ h = g ≫ h
/-- A category `IsFiltered` if
1. for every pair of objects there exists another object "to the right",
2. for every pair of parallel morphisms there exists a morphism to the right so the compositions
are equal, and
3. there exists some object. -/
@[stacks 002V "They also define a diagram being filtered."]
class IsFiltered : Prop extends IsFilteredOrEmpty C where
/-- a filtered category must be non empty -/
-- This should be an instance but it causes significant slowdown
[nonempty : Nonempty C]
instance (priority := 100) isFilteredOrEmpty_of_semilatticeSup (α : Type u) [SemilatticeSup α] :
IsFilteredOrEmpty α where
cocone_objs X Y := ⟨X ⊔ Y, homOfLE le_sup_left, homOfLE le_sup_right, trivial⟩
cocone_maps X Y f g := ⟨Y, 𝟙 _, by subsingleton⟩
instance (priority := 100) isFiltered_of_semilatticeSup_nonempty (α : Type u) [SemilatticeSup α]
[Nonempty α] : IsFiltered α where
instance (priority := 100) isFilteredOrEmpty_of_directed_le (α : Type u) [Preorder α]
[IsDirected α (· ≤ ·)] : IsFilteredOrEmpty α where
cocone_objs X Y :=
let ⟨Z, h1, h2⟩ := exists_ge_ge X Y
⟨Z, homOfLE h1, homOfLE h2, trivial⟩
cocone_maps X Y f g := ⟨Y, 𝟙 _, by subsingleton⟩
instance (priority := 100) isFiltered_of_directed_le_nonempty (α : Type u) [Preorder α]
[IsDirected α (· ≤ ·)] [Nonempty α] : IsFiltered α where
-- Sanity checks
example (α : Type u) [SemilatticeSup α] [OrderBot α] : IsFiltered α := by infer_instance
example (α : Type u) [SemilatticeSup α] [OrderTop α] : IsFiltered α := by infer_instance
instance : IsFiltered (Discrete PUnit) where
cocone_objs X Y := ⟨⟨PUnit.unit⟩, ⟨⟨by trivial⟩⟩, ⟨⟨by subsingleton⟩⟩, trivial⟩
cocone_maps X Y f g := ⟨⟨PUnit.unit⟩, ⟨⟨by trivial⟩⟩, by subsingleton⟩
namespace IsFiltered
section AllowEmpty
variable {C}
variable [IsFilteredOrEmpty C]
/-- `max j j'` is an arbitrary choice of object to the right of both `j` and `j'`,
whose existence is ensured by `IsFiltered`.
-/
noncomputable def max (j j' : C) : C :=
(IsFilteredOrEmpty.cocone_objs j j').choose
/-- `leftToMax j j'` is an arbitrary choice of morphism from `j` to `max j j'`,
whose existence is ensured by `IsFiltered`.
-/
noncomputable def leftToMax (j j' : C) : j ⟶ max j j' :=
(IsFilteredOrEmpty.cocone_objs j j').choose_spec.choose
/-- `rightToMax j j'` is an arbitrary choice of morphism from `j'` to `max j j'`,
whose existence is ensured by `IsFiltered`.
-/
noncomputable def rightToMax (j j' : C) : j' ⟶ max j j' :=
(IsFilteredOrEmpty.cocone_objs j j').choose_spec.choose_spec.choose
/-- `coeq f f'`, for morphisms `f f' : j ⟶ j'`, is an arbitrary choice of object
which admits a morphism `coeqHom f f' : j' ⟶ coeq f f'` such that
`coeq_condition : f ≫ coeqHom f f' = f' ≫ coeqHom f f'`.
Its existence is ensured by `IsFiltered`.
-/
noncomputable def coeq {j j' : C} (f f' : j ⟶ j') : C :=
(IsFilteredOrEmpty.cocone_maps f f').choose
/-- `coeqHom f f'`, for morphisms `f f' : j ⟶ j'`, is an arbitrary choice of morphism
`coeqHom f f' : j' ⟶ coeq f f'` such that
`coeq_condition : f ≫ coeqHom f f' = f' ≫ coeqHom f f'`.
Its existence is ensured by `IsFiltered`.
-/
noncomputable def coeqHom {j j' : C} (f f' : j ⟶ j') : j' ⟶ coeq f f' :=
(IsFilteredOrEmpty.cocone_maps f f').choose_spec.choose
-- Porting note: the simp tag has been removed as the linter complained
/-- `coeq_condition f f'`, for morphisms `f f' : j ⟶ j'`, is the proof that
`f ≫ coeqHom f f' = f' ≫ coeqHom f f'`.
-/
@[reassoc]
theorem coeq_condition {j j' : C} (f f' : j ⟶ j') : f ≫ coeqHom f f' = f' ≫ coeqHom f f' :=
(IsFilteredOrEmpty.cocone_maps f f').choose_spec.choose_spec
end AllowEmpty
end IsFiltered
namespace IsFilteredOrEmpty
open IsFiltered
variable {C}
variable [IsFilteredOrEmpty C]
variable {D : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} D]
/-- If `C` is filtered or empty, and we have a functor `R : C ⥤ D` with a left adjoint, then `D` is
filtered or empty.
-/
theorem of_right_adjoint {L : D ⥤ C} {R : C ⥤ D} (h : L ⊣ R) : IsFilteredOrEmpty D :=
{ cocone_objs := fun X Y =>
⟨R.obj (max (L.obj X) (L.obj Y)),
h.homEquiv _ _ (leftToMax _ _), h.homEquiv _ _ (rightToMax _ _), ⟨⟩⟩
cocone_maps := fun X Y f g =>
⟨R.obj (coeq (L.map f) (L.map g)), h.homEquiv _ _ (coeqHom _ _), by
rw [← h.homEquiv_naturality_left, ← h.homEquiv_naturality_left, coeq_condition]⟩ }
/-- If `C` is filtered or empty, and we have a right adjoint functor `R : C ⥤ D`, then `D` is
filtered or empty. -/
theorem of_isRightAdjoint (R : C ⥤ D) [R.IsRightAdjoint] : IsFilteredOrEmpty D :=
of_right_adjoint (Adjunction.ofIsRightAdjoint R)
/-- Being filtered or empty is preserved by equivalence of categories. -/
theorem of_equivalence (h : C ≌ D) : IsFilteredOrEmpty D :=
of_right_adjoint h.symm.toAdjunction
end IsFilteredOrEmpty
namespace IsFiltered
section Nonempty
open CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {C}
variable [IsFiltered C]
/-- Any finite collection of objects in a filtered category has an object "to the right".
-/
theorem sup_objs_exists (O : Finset C) : ∃ S : C, ∀ {X}, X ∈ O → Nonempty (X ⟶ S) := by
classical
induction' O using Finset.induction with X O' nm h
· exact ⟨Classical.choice IsFiltered.nonempty, by intro; simp⟩
· obtain ⟨S', w'⟩ := h
use max X S'
rintro Y mY
obtain rfl | h := eq_or_ne Y X
· exact ⟨leftToMax _ _⟩
· exact ⟨(w' (Finset.mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne mY h)).some ≫ rightToMax _ _⟩
variable (O : Finset C) (H : Finset (Σ' (X Y : C) (_ : X ∈ O) (_ : Y ∈ O), X ⟶ Y))
/-- Given any `Finset` of objects `{X, ...}` and
indexed collection of `Finset`s of morphisms `{f, ...}` in `C`,
there exists an object `S`, with a morphism `T X : X ⟶ S` from each `X`,
such that the triangles commute: `f ≫ T Y = T X`, for `f : X ⟶ Y` in the `Finset`.
-/
theorem sup_exists :
∃ (S : C) (T : ∀ {X : C}, X ∈ O → (X ⟶ S)),
∀ {X Y : C} (mX : X ∈ O) (mY : Y ∈ O) {f : X ⟶ Y},
(⟨X, Y, mX, mY, f⟩ : Σ' (X Y : C) (_ : X ∈ O) (_ : Y ∈ O), X ⟶ Y) ∈ H →
f ≫ T mY = T mX := by
classical
induction' H using Finset.induction with h' H' nmf h''
· obtain ⟨S, f⟩ := sup_objs_exists O
exact ⟨S, fun mX => (f mX).some, by rintro - - - - - ⟨⟩⟩
· obtain ⟨X, Y, mX, mY, f⟩ := h'
obtain ⟨S', T', w'⟩ := h''
refine ⟨coeq (f ≫ T' mY) (T' mX), fun mZ => T' mZ ≫ coeqHom (f ≫ T' mY) (T' mX), ?_⟩
intro X' Y' mX' mY' f' mf'
rw [← Category.assoc]
by_cases h : X = X' ∧ Y = Y'
· rcases h with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
by_cases hf : f = f'
· subst hf
apply coeq_condition
· rw [@w' _ _ mX mY f']
simp only [Finset.mem_insert, PSigma.mk.injEq, heq_eq_eq, true_and] at mf'
rcases mf' with mf' | mf'
· exfalso
exact hf mf'.symm
· exact mf'
· rw [@w' _ _ mX' mY' f' _]
apply Finset.mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne mf'
contrapose! h
obtain ⟨rfl, h⟩ := h
trivial
/-- An arbitrary choice of object "to the right"
of a finite collection of objects `O` and morphisms `H`,
making all the triangles commute.
-/
noncomputable def sup : C :=
(sup_exists O H).choose
/-- The morphisms to `sup O H`.
-/
noncomputable def toSup {X : C} (m : X ∈ O) : X ⟶ sup O H :=
(sup_exists O H).choose_spec.choose m
/-- The triangles of consisting of a morphism in `H` and the maps to `sup O H` commute.
-/
theorem toSup_commutes {X Y : C} (mX : X ∈ O) (mY : Y ∈ O) {f : X ⟶ Y}
(mf : (⟨X, Y, mX, mY, f⟩ : Σ' (X Y : C) (_ : X ∈ O) (_ : Y ∈ O), X ⟶ Y) ∈ H) :
f ≫ toSup O H mY = toSup O H mX :=
(sup_exists O H).choose_spec.choose_spec mX mY mf
variable {J : Type w} [SmallCategory J] [FinCategory J]
/-- If we have `IsFiltered C`, then for any functor `F : J ⥤ C` with `FinCategory J`,
there exists a cocone over `F`.
-/
theorem cocone_nonempty (F : J ⥤ C) : Nonempty (Cocone F) := by
classical
let O := Finset.univ.image F.obj
let H : Finset (Σ' (X Y : C) (_ : X ∈ O) (_ : Y ∈ O), X ⟶ Y) :=
Finset.univ.biUnion fun X : J =>
Finset.univ.biUnion fun Y : J =>
Finset.univ.image fun f : X ⟶ Y => ⟨F.obj X, F.obj Y, by simp [O], by simp [O], F.map f⟩
obtain ⟨Z, f, w⟩ := sup_exists O H
refine ⟨⟨Z, ⟨fun X => f (by simp [O]), ?_⟩⟩⟩
intro j j' g
dsimp
simp only [Category.comp_id]
apply w
simp only [O, H, Finset.mem_biUnion, Finset.mem_univ, Finset.mem_image, PSigma.mk.injEq,
true_and, exists_and_left]
exact ⟨j, rfl, j', g, by simp⟩
/-- An arbitrary choice of cocone over `F : J ⥤ C`, for `FinCategory J` and `IsFiltered C`.
-/
noncomputable def cocone (F : J ⥤ C) : Cocone F :=
(cocone_nonempty F).some
variable {D : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} D]
/-- If `C` is filtered, and we have a functor `R : C ⥤ D` with a left adjoint, then `D` is filtered.
-/
theorem of_right_adjoint {L : D ⥤ C} {R : C ⥤ D} (h : L ⊣ R) : IsFiltered D :=
{ IsFilteredOrEmpty.of_right_adjoint h with
nonempty := IsFiltered.nonempty.map R.obj }
/-- If `C` is filtered, and we have a right adjoint functor `R : C ⥤ D`, then `D` is filtered. -/
theorem of_isRightAdjoint (R : C ⥤ D) [R.IsRightAdjoint] : IsFiltered D :=
of_right_adjoint (Adjunction.ofIsRightAdjoint R)
/-- Being filtered is preserved by equivalence of categories. -/
theorem of_equivalence (h : C ≌ D) : IsFiltered D :=
of_right_adjoint h.symm.toAdjunction
end Nonempty
section OfCocone
open CategoryTheory.Limits
/-- If every finite diagram in `C` admits a cocone, then `C` is filtered. It is sufficient to verify
this for diagrams whose shape lives in any one fixed universe. -/
theorem of_cocone_nonempty (h : ∀ {J : Type w} [SmallCategory J] [FinCategory J] (F : J ⥤ C),
Nonempty (Cocone F)) : IsFiltered C := by
have : Nonempty C := by
obtain ⟨c⟩ := h (Functor.empty _)
exact ⟨c.pt⟩
have : IsFilteredOrEmpty C := by
refine ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· intros X Y
obtain ⟨c⟩ := h (ULiftHom.down ⋙ ULift.downFunctor ⋙ pair X Y)
exact ⟨c.pt, c.ι.app ⟨⟨WalkingPair.left⟩⟩, c.ι.app ⟨⟨WalkingPair.right⟩⟩, trivial⟩
· intros X Y f g
obtain ⟨c⟩ := h (ULiftHom.down ⋙ ULift.downFunctor ⋙ parallelPair f g)
refine ⟨c.pt, c.ι.app ⟨WalkingParallelPair.one⟩, ?_⟩
have h₁ := c.ι.naturality ⟨WalkingParallelPairHom.left⟩
have h₂ := c.ι.naturality ⟨WalkingParallelPairHom.right⟩
simp_all
apply IsFiltered.mk
theorem of_hasFiniteColimits [HasFiniteColimits C] : IsFiltered C :=
of_cocone_nonempty.{v} C fun F => ⟨colimit.cocone F⟩
theorem of_isTerminal {X : C} (h : IsTerminal X) : IsFiltered C :=
of_cocone_nonempty.{v} _ fun {_} _ _ _ => ⟨⟨X, ⟨fun _ => h.from _, fun _ _ _ => h.hom_ext _ _⟩⟩⟩
instance (priority := 100) of_hasTerminal [HasTerminal C] : IsFiltered C :=
of_isTerminal _ terminalIsTerminal
/-- For every universe `w`, `C` is filtered if and only if every finite diagram in `C` with shape
in `w` admits a cocone. -/
theorem iff_cocone_nonempty : IsFiltered C ↔
∀ {J : Type w} [SmallCategory J] [FinCategory J] (F : J ⥤ C), Nonempty (Cocone F) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ _ F => cocone_nonempty F, of_cocone_nonempty C⟩
end OfCocone
section SpecialShapes
variable {C}
variable [IsFilteredOrEmpty C]
/-- `max₃ j₁ j₂ j₃` is an arbitrary choice of object to the right of `j₁`, `j₂` and `j₃`,
whose existence is ensured by `IsFiltered`.
-/
noncomputable def max₃ (j₁ j₂ j₃ : C) : C :=
max (max j₁ j₂) j₃
/-- `firstToMax₃ j₁ j₂ j₃` is an arbitrary choice of morphism from `j₁` to `max₃ j₁ j₂ j₃`,
whose existence is ensured by `IsFiltered`.
-/
noncomputable def firstToMax₃ (j₁ j₂ j₃ : C) : j₁ ⟶ max₃ j₁ j₂ j₃ :=
leftToMax j₁ j₂ ≫ leftToMax (max j₁ j₂) j₃
/-- `secondToMax₃ j₁ j₂ j₃` is an arbitrary choice of morphism from `j₂` to `max₃ j₁ j₂ j₃`,
whose existence is ensured by `IsFiltered`.
-/
noncomputable def secondToMax₃ (j₁ j₂ j₃ : C) : j₂ ⟶ max₃ j₁ j₂ j₃ :=
rightToMax j₁ j₂ ≫ leftToMax (max j₁ j₂) j₃
/-- `thirdToMax₃ j₁ j₂ j₃` is an arbitrary choice of morphism from `j₃` to `max₃ j₁ j₂ j₃`,
whose existence is ensured by `IsFiltered`.
-/
noncomputable def thirdToMax₃ (j₁ j₂ j₃ : C) : j₃ ⟶ max₃ j₁ j₂ j₃ :=
rightToMax (max j₁ j₂) j₃
/-- `coeq₃ f g h`, for morphisms `f g h : j₁ ⟶ j₂`, is an arbitrary choice of object
which admits a morphism `coeq₃Hom f g h : j₂ ⟶ coeq₃ f g h` such that
`coeq₃_condition₁`, `coeq₃_condition₂` and `coeq₃_condition₃` are satisfied.
Its existence is ensured by `IsFiltered`.
-/
noncomputable def coeq₃ {j₁ j₂ : C} (f g h : j₁ ⟶ j₂) : C :=
coeq (coeqHom f g ≫ leftToMax (coeq f g) (coeq g h))
(coeqHom g h ≫ rightToMax (coeq f g) (coeq g h))
/-- `coeq₃Hom f g h`, for morphisms `f g h : j₁ ⟶ j₂`, is an arbitrary choice of morphism
`j₂ ⟶ coeq₃ f g h` such that `coeq₃_condition₁`, `coeq₃_condition₂` and `coeq₃_condition₃`
are satisfied. Its existence is ensured by `IsFiltered`.
-/
noncomputable def coeq₃Hom {j₁ j₂ : C} (f g h : j₁ ⟶ j₂) : j₂ ⟶ coeq₃ f g h :=
coeqHom f g ≫
leftToMax (coeq f g) (coeq g h) ≫
coeqHom (coeqHom f g ≫ leftToMax (coeq f g) (coeq g h))
(coeqHom g h ≫ rightToMax (coeq f g) (coeq g h))
theorem coeq₃_condition₁ {j₁ j₂ : C} (f g h : j₁ ⟶ j₂) :
f ≫ coeq₃Hom f g h = g ≫ coeq₃Hom f g h := by
simp only [coeq₃Hom, ← Category.assoc, coeq_condition f g]
theorem coeq₃_condition₂ {j₁ j₂ : C} (f g h : j₁ ⟶ j₂) :
g ≫ coeq₃Hom f g h = h ≫ coeq₃Hom f g h := by
dsimp [coeq₃Hom]
slice_lhs 2 4 => rw [← Category.assoc, coeq_condition _ _]
slice_rhs 2 4 => rw [← Category.assoc, coeq_condition _ _]
slice_lhs 1 3 => rw [← Category.assoc, coeq_condition _ _]
simp only [Category.assoc]
theorem coeq₃_condition₃ {j₁ j₂ : C} (f g h : j₁ ⟶ j₂) : f ≫ coeq₃Hom f g h = h ≫ coeq₃Hom f g h :=
Eq.trans (coeq₃_condition₁ f g h) (coeq₃_condition₂ f g h)
/-- For every span `j ⟵ i ⟶ j'`, there
exists a cocone `j ⟶ k ⟵ j'` such that the square commutes. -/
theorem span {i j j' : C} (f : i ⟶ j) (f' : i ⟶ j') :
∃ (k : C) (g : j ⟶ k) (g' : j' ⟶ k), f ≫ g = f' ≫ g' :=
let ⟨K, G, G', _⟩ := IsFilteredOrEmpty.cocone_objs j j'
let ⟨k, e, he⟩ := IsFilteredOrEmpty.cocone_maps (f ≫ G) (f' ≫ G')
⟨k, G ≫ e, G' ≫ e, by simpa only [← Category.assoc] ⟩
/-- Given a "bowtie" of morphisms
```
j₁ j₂
|\ /|
| \/ |
| /\ |
|/ \∣
vv vv
k₁ k₂
```
in a filtered category, we can construct an object `s` and two morphisms from `k₁` and `k₂` to `s`,
making the resulting squares commute.
-/
theorem bowtie {j₁ j₂ k₁ k₂ : C} (f₁ : j₁ ⟶ k₁) (g₁ : j₁ ⟶ k₂) (f₂ : j₂ ⟶ k₁) (g₂ : j₂ ⟶ k₂) :
∃ (s : C) (α : k₁ ⟶ s) (β : k₂ ⟶ s), f₁ ≫ α = g₁ ≫ β ∧ f₂ ≫ α = g₂ ≫ β := by
obtain ⟨t, k₁t, k₂t, ht⟩ := span f₁ g₁
obtain ⟨s, ts, hs⟩ := IsFilteredOrEmpty.cocone_maps (f₂ ≫ k₁t) (g₂ ≫ k₂t)
simp_rw [Category.assoc] at hs
exact ⟨s, k₁t ≫ ts, k₂t ≫ ts, by simp only [← Category.assoc, ht], hs⟩
/-- Given a "tulip" of morphisms
```
j₁ j₂ j₃
|\ / \ / |
| \ / \ / |
| vv vv |
\ k₁ k₂ /
\ /
\ /
\ /
\ /
v v
l
```
in a filtered category, we can construct an object `s` and three morphisms from `k₁`, `k₂` and `l`
to `s`, making the resulting squares commute.
-/
theorem tulip {j₁ j₂ j₃ k₁ k₂ l : C} (f₁ : j₁ ⟶ k₁) (f₂ : j₂ ⟶ k₁) (f₃ : j₂ ⟶ k₂) (f₄ : j₃ ⟶ k₂)
(g₁ : j₁ ⟶ l) (g₂ : j₃ ⟶ l) :
∃ (s : C) (α : k₁ ⟶ s) (β : l ⟶ s) (γ : k₂ ⟶ s),
f₁ ≫ α = g₁ ≫ β ∧ f₂ ≫ α = f₃ ≫ γ ∧ f₄ ≫ γ = g₂ ≫ β := by
obtain ⟨l', k₁l, k₂l, hl⟩ := span f₂ f₃
obtain ⟨s, ls, l's, hs₁, hs₂⟩ := bowtie g₁ (f₁ ≫ k₁l) g₂ (f₄ ≫ k₂l)
refine ⟨s, k₁l ≫ l's, ls, k₂l ≫ l's, ?_, by simp only [← Category.assoc, hl], ?_⟩ <;>
simp only [hs₁, hs₂, Category.assoc]
end SpecialShapes
end IsFiltered
| /-- A category `IsCofilteredOrEmpty` if
1. for every pair of objects there exists another object "to the left", and
2. for every pair of parallel morphisms there exists a morphism to the left so the compositions
are equal.
-/
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Filtered/Basic.lean | 481 | 485 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Altitude
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Circumcenter
/-!
# Monge point and orthocenter
This file defines the orthocenter of a triangle, via its n-dimensional
generalization, the Monge point of a simplex.
## Main definitions
* `mongePoint` is the Monge point of a simplex, defined in terms of
its position on the Euler line and then shown to be the point of
concurrence of the Monge planes.
* `mongePlane` is a Monge plane of an (n+2)-simplex, which is the
(n+1)-dimensional affine subspace of the subspace spanned by the
simplex that passes through the centroid of an n-dimensional face
and is orthogonal to the opposite edge (in 2 dimensions, this is the
same as an altitude).
* `orthocenter` is defined, for the case of a triangle, to be the same
as its Monge point, then shown to be the point of concurrence of the
altitudes.
* `OrthocentricSystem` is a predicate on sets of points that says
whether they are four points, one of which is the orthocenter of the
other three (in which case various other properties hold, including
that each is the orthocenter of the other three).
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monge_point>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orthocentric_system>
* Małgorzata Buba-Brzozowa, [The Monge Point and the 3(n+1) Point
Sphere of an
n-Simplex](https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6f8b/0f623459c76dac2e49255737f8f0f4725d16.pdf)
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped RealInnerProductSpace
namespace Affine
namespace Simplex
open Finset AffineSubspace EuclideanGeometry PointsWithCircumcenterIndex
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P]
/-- The Monge point of a simplex (in 2 or more dimensions) is a
generalization of the orthocenter of a triangle. It is defined to be
the intersection of the Monge planes, where a Monge plane is the
(n-1)-dimensional affine subspace of the subspace spanned by the
simplex that passes through the centroid of an (n-2)-dimensional face
and is orthogonal to the opposite edge (in 2 dimensions, this is the
same as an altitude). The circumcenter O, centroid G and Monge point
M are collinear in that order on the Euler line, with OG : GM = (n-1): 2.
Here, we use that ratio to define the Monge point (so resulting
in a point that equals the centroid in 0 or 1 dimensions), and then
show in subsequent lemmas that the point so defined lies in the Monge
planes and is their unique point of intersection. -/
def mongePoint {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) : P :=
(((n + 1 : ℕ) : ℝ) / ((n - 1 : ℕ) : ℝ)) •
((univ : Finset (Fin (n + 1))).centroid ℝ s.points -ᵥ s.circumcenter) +ᵥ
s.circumcenter
/-- The position of the Monge point in relation to the circumcenter
and centroid. -/
theorem mongePoint_eq_smul_vsub_vadd_circumcenter {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) :
s.mongePoint =
(((n + 1 : ℕ) : ℝ) / ((n - 1 : ℕ) : ℝ)) •
((univ : Finset (Fin (n + 1))).centroid ℝ s.points -ᵥ s.circumcenter) +ᵥ
s.circumcenter :=
rfl
/-- The Monge point lies in the affine span. -/
theorem mongePoint_mem_affineSpan {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P n) :
s.mongePoint ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points) :=
smul_vsub_vadd_mem _ _ (centroid_mem_affineSpan_of_card_eq_add_one ℝ _ (card_fin (n + 1)))
s.circumcenter_mem_affineSpan s.circumcenter_mem_affineSpan
/-- Two simplices with the same points have the same Monge point. -/
theorem mongePoint_eq_of_range_eq {n : ℕ} {s₁ s₂ : Simplex ℝ P n}
(h : Set.range s₁.points = Set.range s₂.points) : s₁.mongePoint = s₂.mongePoint := by
simp_rw [mongePoint_eq_smul_vsub_vadd_circumcenter, centroid_eq_of_range_eq h,
circumcenter_eq_of_range_eq h]
/-- The weights for the Monge point of an (n+2)-simplex, in terms of
`pointsWithCircumcenter`. -/
def mongePointWeightsWithCircumcenter (n : ℕ) : PointsWithCircumcenterIndex (n + 2) → ℝ
| pointIndex _ => ((n + 1 : ℕ) : ℝ)⁻¹
| circumcenterIndex => -2 / ((n + 1 : ℕ) : ℝ)
/-- `mongePointWeightsWithCircumcenter` sums to 1. -/
@[simp]
theorem sum_mongePointWeightsWithCircumcenter (n : ℕ) :
∑ i, mongePointWeightsWithCircumcenter n i = 1 := by
simp_rw [sum_pointsWithCircumcenter, mongePointWeightsWithCircumcenter, sum_const, card_fin,
nsmul_eq_mul]
field_simp
ring
/-- The Monge point of an (n+2)-simplex, in terms of
`pointsWithCircumcenter`. -/
theorem mongePoint_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ}
(s : Simplex ℝ P (n + 2)) :
s.mongePoint =
(univ : Finset (PointsWithCircumcenterIndex (n + 2))).affineCombination ℝ
s.pointsWithCircumcenter (mongePointWeightsWithCircumcenter n) := by
rw [mongePoint_eq_smul_vsub_vadd_circumcenter,
centroid_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter,
circumcenter_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter, affineCombination_vsub,
← LinearMap.map_smul, weightedVSub_vadd_affineCombination]
congr with i
rw [Pi.add_apply, Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, Pi.sub_apply]
-- Porting note: replaced
-- have hn1 : (n + 1 : ℝ) ≠ 0 := mod_cast Nat.succ_ne_zero _
have hn1 : (n + 1 : ℝ) ≠ 0 := n.cast_add_one_ne_zero
cases i <;>
simp_rw [centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter, circumcenterWeightsWithCircumcenter,
mongePointWeightsWithCircumcenter] <;>
rw [add_tsub_assoc_of_le (by decide : 1 ≤ 2), (by decide : 2 - 1 = 1)]
· rw [if_pos (mem_univ _), sub_zero, add_zero, card_fin]
-- Porting note: replaced
-- have hn3 : (n + 2 + 1 : ℝ) ≠ 0 := mod_cast Nat.succ_ne_zero _
have hn3 : (n + 2 + 1 : ℝ) ≠ 0 := by norm_cast
field_simp [hn1, hn3, mul_comm]
· field_simp [hn1]
ring
/-- The weights for the Monge point of an (n+2)-simplex, minus the
centroid of an n-dimensional face, in terms of
`pointsWithCircumcenter`. This definition is only valid when `i₁ ≠ i₂`. -/
def mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} (i₁ i₂ : Fin (n + 3)) :
PointsWithCircumcenterIndex (n + 2) → ℝ
| pointIndex i => if i = i₁ ∨ i = i₂ then ((n + 1 : ℕ) : ℝ)⁻¹ else 0
| circumcenterIndex => -2 / ((n + 1 : ℕ) : ℝ)
/-- `mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter` is the
result of subtracting `centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter` from
`mongePointWeightsWithCircumcenter`. -/
theorem mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter_eq_sub {n : ℕ} {i₁ i₂ : Fin (n + 3)}
(h : i₁ ≠ i₂) :
mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter i₁ i₂ =
mongePointWeightsWithCircumcenter n - centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter {i₁, i₂}ᶜ := by
ext i
obtain i | i := i
· rw [Pi.sub_apply, mongePointWeightsWithCircumcenter, centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter,
mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter]
have hu : #{i₁, i₂}ᶜ = n + 1 := by
simp [card_compl, Fintype.card_fin, h]
rw [hu]
by_cases hi : i = i₁ ∨ i = i₂ <;> simp [compl_eq_univ_sdiff, hi]
· simp [mongePointWeightsWithCircumcenter, centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter,
mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter]
/-- `mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter` sums to 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem sum_mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ} {i₁ i₂ : Fin (n + 3)}
(h : i₁ ≠ i₂) : ∑ i, mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter i₁ i₂ i = 0 := by
rw [mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter_eq_sub h]
simp_rw [Pi.sub_apply, sum_sub_distrib, sum_mongePointWeightsWithCircumcenter]
rw [sum_centroidWeightsWithCircumcenter, sub_self]
simp [← card_pos, card_compl, h]
/-- The Monge point of an (n+2)-simplex, minus the centroid of an
n-dimensional face, in terms of `pointsWithCircumcenter`. -/
theorem mongePoint_vsub_face_centroid_eq_weightedVSub_of_pointsWithCircumcenter {n : ℕ}
(s : Simplex ℝ P (n + 2)) {i₁ i₂ : Fin (n + 3)} (h : i₁ ≠ i₂) :
s.mongePoint -ᵥ ({i₁, i₂}ᶜ : Finset (Fin (n + 3))).centroid ℝ s.points =
(univ : Finset (PointsWithCircumcenterIndex (n + 2))).weightedVSub s.pointsWithCircumcenter
(mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter i₁ i₂) := by
simp_rw [mongePoint_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter,
centroid_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter, affineCombination_vsub,
mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter_eq_sub h]
/-- The Monge point of an (n+2)-simplex, minus the centroid of an
n-dimensional face, is orthogonal to the difference of the two
vertices not in that face. -/
theorem inner_mongePoint_vsub_face_centroid_vsub {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P (n + 2))
{i₁ i₂ : Fin (n + 3)} :
⟪s.mongePoint -ᵥ ({i₁, i₂}ᶜ : Finset (Fin (n + 3))).centroid ℝ s.points,
s.points i₁ -ᵥ s.points i₂⟫ =
0 := by
by_cases h : i₁ = i₂
· simp [h]
simp_rw [mongePoint_vsub_face_centroid_eq_weightedVSub_of_pointsWithCircumcenter s h,
point_eq_affineCombination_of_pointsWithCircumcenter, affineCombination_vsub]
have hs : ∑ i, (pointWeightsWithCircumcenter i₁ - pointWeightsWithCircumcenter i₂) i = 0 := by
simp
rw [inner_weightedVSub _ (sum_mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter h) _ hs,
sum_pointsWithCircumcenter, pointsWithCircumcenter_eq_circumcenter]
simp only [mongePointVSubFaceCentroidWeightsWithCircumcenter, pointsWithCircumcenter_point]
let fs : Finset (Fin (n + 3)) := {i₁, i₂}
have hfs : ∀ i : Fin (n + 3), i ∉ fs → i ≠ i₁ ∧ i ≠ i₂ := by
intro i hi
constructor <;> · intro hj; simp [fs, ← hj] at hi
rw [← sum_subset fs.subset_univ _]
· simp_rw [sum_pointsWithCircumcenter, pointsWithCircumcenter_eq_circumcenter,
pointsWithCircumcenter_point, Pi.sub_apply, pointWeightsWithCircumcenter]
rw [← sum_subset fs.subset_univ _]
· simp_rw [fs, sum_insert (not_mem_singleton.2 h), sum_singleton]
repeat rw [← sum_subset fs.subset_univ _]
· simp_rw [fs, sum_insert (not_mem_singleton.2 h), sum_singleton]
simp [h, Ne.symm h, dist_comm (s.points i₁)]
all_goals intro i _ hi; simp [hfs i hi]
· intro i _ hi
simp [hfs i hi, pointsWithCircumcenter]
· intro i _ hi
simp [hfs i hi]
/-- A Monge plane of an (n+2)-simplex is the (n+1)-dimensional affine
subspace of the subspace spanned by the simplex that passes through
the centroid of an n-dimensional face and is orthogonal to the
opposite edge (in 2 dimensions, this is the same as an altitude).
This definition is only intended to be used when `i₁ ≠ i₂`. -/
def mongePlane {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P (n + 2)) (i₁ i₂ : Fin (n + 3)) : AffineSubspace ℝ P :=
mk' (({i₁, i₂}ᶜ : Finset (Fin (n + 3))).centroid ℝ s.points) (ℝ ∙ s.points i₁ -ᵥ s.points i₂)ᗮ ⊓
affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points)
/-- The definition of a Monge plane. -/
theorem mongePlane_def {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P (n + 2)) (i₁ i₂ : Fin (n + 3)) :
s.mongePlane i₁ i₂ =
mk' (({i₁, i₂}ᶜ : Finset (Fin (n + 3))).centroid ℝ s.points)
(ℝ ∙ s.points i₁ -ᵥ s.points i₂)ᗮ ⊓
affineSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points) :=
rfl
/-- The Monge plane associated with vertices `i₁` and `i₂` equals that
associated with `i₂` and `i₁`. -/
theorem mongePlane_comm {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P (n + 2)) (i₁ i₂ : Fin (n + 3)) :
s.mongePlane i₁ i₂ = s.mongePlane i₂ i₁ := by
simp_rw [mongePlane_def]
congr 3
· congr 1
exact pair_comm _ _
· ext
simp_rw [Submodule.mem_span_singleton]
constructor
all_goals rintro ⟨r, rfl⟩; use -r; rw [neg_smul, ← smul_neg, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
/-- The Monge point lies in the Monge planes. -/
theorem mongePoint_mem_mongePlane {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P (n + 2)) {i₁ i₂ : Fin (n + 3)} :
s.mongePoint ∈ s.mongePlane i₁ i₂ := by
rw [mongePlane_def, mem_inf_iff, ← vsub_right_mem_direction_iff_mem (self_mem_mk' _ _),
direction_mk', Submodule.mem_orthogonal']
refine ⟨?_, s.mongePoint_mem_affineSpan⟩
intro v hv
rcases Submodule.mem_span_singleton.mp hv with ⟨r, rfl⟩
rw [inner_smul_right, s.inner_mongePoint_vsub_face_centroid_vsub, mul_zero]
/-- The direction of a Monge plane. -/
theorem direction_mongePlane {n : ℕ} (s : Simplex ℝ P (n + 2)) {i₁ i₂ : Fin (n + 3)} :
(s.mongePlane i₁ i₂).direction =
(ℝ ∙ s.points i₁ -ᵥ s.points i₂)ᗮ ⊓ vectorSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points) := by
rw [mongePlane_def, direction_inf_of_mem_inf s.mongePoint_mem_mongePlane, direction_mk',
direction_affineSpan]
/-- The Monge point is the only point in all the Monge planes from any
one vertex. -/
theorem eq_mongePoint_of_forall_mem_mongePlane {n : ℕ} {s : Simplex ℝ P (n + 2)} {i₁ : Fin (n + 3)}
{p : P} (h : ∀ i₂, i₁ ≠ i₂ → p ∈ s.mongePlane i₁ i₂) : p = s.mongePoint := by
rw [← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V]
have h' : ∀ i₂, i₁ ≠ i₂ → p -ᵥ s.mongePoint ∈
(ℝ ∙ s.points i₁ -ᵥ s.points i₂)ᗮ ⊓ vectorSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points) := by
intro i₂ hne
rw [← s.direction_mongePlane, vsub_right_mem_direction_iff_mem s.mongePoint_mem_mongePlane]
exact h i₂ hne
have hi : p -ᵥ s.mongePoint ∈ ⨅ i₂ : { i // i₁ ≠ i }, (ℝ ∙ s.points i₁ -ᵥ s.points i₂)ᗮ := by
rw [Submodule.mem_iInf]
exact fun i => (Submodule.mem_inf.1 (h' i i.property)).1
rw [Submodule.iInf_orthogonal, ← Submodule.span_iUnion] at hi
have hu :
⋃ i : { i // i₁ ≠ i }, ({s.points i₁ -ᵥ s.points i} : Set V) =
(s.points i₁ -ᵥ ·) '' (s.points '' (Set.univ \ {i₁})) := by
rw [Set.image_image]
ext x
simp_rw [Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_image, Set.mem_singleton_iff, Set.mem_diff_singleton]
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, rfl⟩
use i, ⟨Set.mem_univ _, i.property.symm⟩
· rintro ⟨i, ⟨-, hi⟩, rfl⟩
use ⟨i, hi.symm⟩
rw [hu, ← vectorSpan_image_eq_span_vsub_set_left_ne ℝ _ (Set.mem_univ _), Set.image_univ] at hi
have hv : p -ᵥ s.mongePoint ∈ vectorSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points) := by
let s₁ : Finset (Fin (n + 3)) := univ.erase i₁
obtain ⟨i₂, h₂⟩ := card_pos.1 (show 0 < #s₁ by simp [s₁, card_erase_of_mem])
have h₁₂ : i₁ ≠ i₂ := (ne_of_mem_erase h₂).symm
exact (Submodule.mem_inf.1 (h' i₂ h₁₂)).2
exact Submodule.disjoint_def.1 (vectorSpan ℝ (Set.range s.points)).orthogonal_disjoint _ hv hi
end Simplex
namespace Triangle
open EuclideanGeometry Finset Simplex AffineSubspace Module
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P]
/-- The orthocenter of a triangle is the intersection of its
altitudes. It is defined here as the 2-dimensional case of the
Monge point. -/
def orthocenter (t : Triangle ℝ P) : P :=
t.mongePoint
/-- The orthocenter equals the Monge point. -/
theorem orthocenter_eq_mongePoint (t : Triangle ℝ P) : t.orthocenter = t.mongePoint :=
rfl
/-- The position of the orthocenter in relation to the circumcenter
and centroid. -/
theorem orthocenter_eq_smul_vsub_vadd_circumcenter (t : Triangle ℝ P) :
t.orthocenter =
(3 : ℝ) • ((univ : Finset (Fin 3)).centroid ℝ t.points -ᵥ t.circumcenter : V) +ᵥ
t.circumcenter := by
rw [orthocenter_eq_mongePoint, mongePoint_eq_smul_vsub_vadd_circumcenter]
norm_num
/-- The orthocenter lies in the affine span. -/
theorem orthocenter_mem_affineSpan (t : Triangle ℝ P) :
t.orthocenter ∈ affineSpan ℝ (Set.range t.points) :=
t.mongePoint_mem_affineSpan
/-- Two triangles with the same points have the same orthocenter. -/
theorem orthocenter_eq_of_range_eq {t₁ t₂ : Triangle ℝ P}
(h : Set.range t₁.points = Set.range t₂.points) : t₁.orthocenter = t₂.orthocenter :=
mongePoint_eq_of_range_eq h
/-- In the case of a triangle, altitudes are the same thing as Monge
planes. -/
theorem altitude_eq_mongePlane (t : Triangle ℝ P) {i₁ i₂ i₃ : Fin 3} (h₁₂ : i₁ ≠ i₂) (h₁₃ : i₁ ≠ i₃)
(h₂₃ : i₂ ≠ i₃) : t.altitude i₁ = t.mongePlane i₂ i₃ := by
have hs : ({i₂, i₃}ᶜ : Finset (Fin 3)) = {i₁} := by decide +revert
have he : univ.erase i₁ = {i₂, i₃} := by decide +revert
rw [mongePlane_def, altitude_def, direction_affineSpan, hs, he, centroid_singleton, coe_insert,
coe_singleton, vectorSpan_image_eq_span_vsub_set_left_ne ℝ _ (Set.mem_insert i₂ _)]
simp [h₂₃, Submodule.span_insert_eq_span]
/-- The orthocenter lies in the altitudes. -/
theorem orthocenter_mem_altitude (t : Triangle ℝ P) {i₁ : Fin 3} :
t.orthocenter ∈ t.altitude i₁ := by
| obtain ⟨i₂, i₃, h₁₂, h₂₃, h₁₃⟩ : ∃ i₂ i₃, i₁ ≠ i₂ ∧ i₂ ≠ i₃ ∧ i₁ ≠ i₃ := by
decide +revert
rw [orthocenter_eq_mongePoint, t.altitude_eq_mongePlane h₁₂ h₁₃ h₂₃]
exact t.mongePoint_mem_mongePlane
/-- The orthocenter is the only point lying in any two of the
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/MongePoint.lean | 352 | 357 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.