Context stringlengths 227 76.5k | target stringlengths 0 11.6k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 16 3.69k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Pointwise.Interval
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.BilinearMap
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Pi
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Prod
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
import Mathlib.Algebra.AddTorsor.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Defs
/-!
# Affine maps
This file defines affine maps.
## Main definitions
* `AffineMap` is the type of affine maps between two affine spaces with the same ring `k`. Various
basic examples of affine maps are defined, including `const`, `id`, `lineMap` and `homothety`.
## Notations
* `P1 →ᵃ[k] P2` is a notation for `AffineMap k P1 P2`;
* `AffineSpace V P`: a localized notation for `AddTorsor V P` defined in
`LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Basic`.
## Implementation notes
`outParam` is used in the definition of `[AddTorsor V P]` to make `V` an implicit argument
(deduced from `P`) in most cases. As for modules, `k` is an explicit argument rather than implied by
`P` or `V`.
This file only provides purely algebraic definitions and results. Those depending on analysis or
topology are defined elsewhere; see `Analysis.Normed.Affine.AddTorsor` and
`Topology.Algebra.Affine`.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affine_space
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principal_homogeneous_space
-/
open Affine
/-- An `AffineMap k P1 P2` (notation: `P1 →ᵃ[k] P2`) is a map from `P1` to `P2` that
induces a corresponding linear map from `V1` to `V2`. -/
structure AffineMap (k : Type*) {V1 : Type*} (P1 : Type*) {V2 : Type*} (P2 : Type*) [Ring k]
[AddCommGroup V1] [Module k V1] [AffineSpace V1 P1] [AddCommGroup V2] [Module k V2]
[AffineSpace V2 P2] where
toFun : P1 → P2
linear : V1 →ₗ[k] V2
map_vadd' : ∀ (p : P1) (v : V1), toFun (v +ᵥ p) = linear v +ᵥ toFun p
/-- An `AffineMap k P1 P2` (notation: `P1 →ᵃ[k] P2`) is a map from `P1` to `P2` that
induces a corresponding linear map from `V1` to `V2`. -/
notation:25 P1 " →ᵃ[" k:25 "] " P2:0 => AffineMap k P1 P2
instance AffineMap.instFunLike (k : Type*) {V1 : Type*} (P1 : Type*) {V2 : Type*} (P2 : Type*)
[Ring k] [AddCommGroup V1] [Module k V1] [AffineSpace V1 P1] [AddCommGroup V2] [Module k V2]
[AffineSpace V2 P2] : FunLike (P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) P1 P2 where
coe := AffineMap.toFun
coe_injective' := fun ⟨f, f_linear, f_add⟩ ⟨g, g_linear, g_add⟩ => fun (h : f = g) => by
obtain ⟨p⟩ := (AddTorsor.nonempty : Nonempty P1)
congr with v
apply vadd_right_cancel (f p)
rw [← f_add, h, ← g_add]
namespace LinearMap
variable {k : Type*} {V₁ : Type*} {V₂ : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V₁] [Module k V₁]
[AddCommGroup V₂] [Module k V₂] (f : V₁ →ₗ[k] V₂)
/-- Reinterpret a linear map as an affine map. -/
def toAffineMap : V₁ →ᵃ[k] V₂ where
toFun := f
linear := f
map_vadd' p v := f.map_add v p
@[simp]
theorem coe_toAffineMap : ⇑f.toAffineMap = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toAffineMap_linear : f.toAffineMap.linear = f :=
rfl
end LinearMap
namespace AffineMap
variable {k : Type*} {V1 : Type*} {P1 : Type*} {V2 : Type*} {P2 : Type*} {V3 : Type*}
{P3 : Type*} {V4 : Type*} {P4 : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V1] [Module k V1]
[AffineSpace V1 P1] [AddCommGroup V2] [Module k V2] [AffineSpace V2 P2] [AddCommGroup V3]
[Module k V3] [AffineSpace V3 P3] [AddCommGroup V4] [Module k V4] [AffineSpace V4 P4]
/-- Constructing an affine map and coercing back to a function
produces the same map. -/
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk (f : P1 → P2) (linear add) : ((mk f linear add : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) : P1 → P2) = f :=
rfl
/-- `toFun` is the same as the result of coercing to a function. -/
@[simp]
theorem toFun_eq_coe (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) : f.toFun = ⇑f :=
rfl
/-- An affine map on the result of adding a vector to a point produces
the same result as the linear map applied to that vector, added to the
affine map applied to that point. -/
@[simp]
theorem map_vadd (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) (p : P1) (v : V1) : f (v +ᵥ p) = f.linear v +ᵥ f p :=
f.map_vadd' p v
/-- The linear map on the result of subtracting two points is the
result of subtracting the result of the affine map on those two
points. -/
@[simp]
theorem linearMap_vsub (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) (p1 p2 : P1) : f.linear (p1 -ᵥ p2) = f p1 -ᵥ f p2 := by
conv_rhs => rw [← vsub_vadd p1 p2, map_vadd, vadd_vsub]
/-- Two affine maps are equal if they coerce to the same function. -/
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2} (h : ∀ p, f p = g p) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
theorem coeFn_injective : @Function.Injective (P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) (P1 → P2) (⇑) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective
protected theorem congr_arg (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) {x y : P1} (h : x = y) : f x = f y :=
congr_arg _ h
protected theorem congr_fun {f g : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2} (h : f = g) (x : P1) : f x = g x :=
h ▸ rfl
/-- Two affine maps are equal if they have equal linear maps and are equal at some point. -/
theorem ext_linear {f g : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2} (h₁ : f.linear = g.linear) {p : P1} (h₂ : f p = g p) :
f = g := by
ext q
have hgl : g.linear (q -ᵥ p) = toFun g ((q -ᵥ p) +ᵥ q) -ᵥ toFun g q := by simp
have := f.map_vadd' q (q -ᵥ p)
rw [h₁, hgl, toFun_eq_coe, map_vadd, linearMap_vsub, h₂] at this
simpa
/-- Two affine maps are equal if they have equal linear maps and are equal at some point. -/
theorem ext_linear_iff {f g : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2} : f = g ↔ (f.linear = g.linear) ∧ (∃ p, f p = g p) :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨congrArg _ h, by inhabit P1; exact default, by rw [h]⟩,
fun h ↦ Exists.casesOn h.2 fun _ hp ↦ ext_linear h.1 hp⟩
variable (k P1)
/-- The constant function as an `AffineMap`. -/
def const (p : P2) : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2 where
toFun := Function.const P1 p
linear := 0
map_vadd' _ _ :=
letI : AddAction V2 P2 := inferInstance
by simp
@[simp]
theorem coe_const (p : P2) : ⇑(const k P1 p) = Function.const P1 p :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem const_apply (p : P2) (q : P1) : (const k P1 p) q = p := rfl
@[simp]
theorem const_linear (p : P2) : (const k P1 p).linear = 0 :=
rfl
variable {k P1}
theorem linear_eq_zero_iff_exists_const (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) :
f.linear = 0 ↔ ∃ q, f = const k P1 q := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· use f (Classical.arbitrary P1)
ext
rw [coe_const, Function.const_apply, ← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V2, ← f.linearMap_vsub, h,
LinearMap.zero_apply]
· rcases h with ⟨q, rfl⟩
exact const_linear k P1 q
instance nonempty : Nonempty (P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) :=
(AddTorsor.nonempty : Nonempty P2).map <| const k P1
/-- Construct an affine map by verifying the relation between the map and its linear part at one
base point. Namely, this function takes a map `f : P₁ → P₂`, a linear map `f' : V₁ →ₗ[k] V₂`, and
a point `p` such that for any other point `p'` we have `f p' = f' (p' -ᵥ p) +ᵥ f p`. -/
def mk' (f : P1 → P2) (f' : V1 →ₗ[k] V2) (p : P1) (h : ∀ p' : P1, f p' = f' (p' -ᵥ p) +ᵥ f p) :
P1 →ᵃ[k] P2 where
toFun := f
linear := f'
map_vadd' p' v := by rw [h, h p', vadd_vsub_assoc, f'.map_add, vadd_vadd]
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk' (f : P1 → P2) (f' : V1 →ₗ[k] V2) (p h) : ⇑(mk' f f' p h) = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk'_linear (f : P1 → P2) (f' : V1 →ₗ[k] V2) (p h) : (mk' f f' p h).linear = f' :=
rfl
section SMul
variable {R : Type*} [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R V2] [SMulCommClass k R V2]
/-- The space of affine maps to a module inherits an `R`-action from the action on its codomain. -/
instance mulAction : MulAction R (P1 →ᵃ[k] V2) where
smul c f := ⟨c • ⇑f, c • f.linear, fun p v => by simp [smul_add]⟩
one_smul _ := ext fun _ => one_smul _ _
mul_smul _ _ _ := ext fun _ => mul_smul _ _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul (c : R) (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] V2) : ⇑(c • f) = c • ⇑f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem smul_linear (t : R) (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] V2) : (t • f).linear = t • f.linear :=
rfl
instance isCentralScalar [DistribMulAction Rᵐᵒᵖ V2] [IsCentralScalar R V2] :
IsCentralScalar R (P1 →ᵃ[k] V2) where
op_smul_eq_smul _r _x := ext fun _ => op_smul_eq_smul _ _
end SMul
instance : Zero (P1 →ᵃ[k] V2) where zero := ⟨0, 0, fun _ _ => (zero_vadd _ _).symm⟩
instance : Add (P1 →ᵃ[k] V2) where
add f g := ⟨f + g, f.linear + g.linear, fun p v => by simp [add_add_add_comm]⟩
instance : Sub (P1 →ᵃ[k] V2) where
sub f g := ⟨f - g, f.linear - g.linear, fun p v => by simp [sub_add_sub_comm]⟩
instance : Neg (P1 →ᵃ[k] V2) where
neg f := ⟨-f, -f.linear, fun p v => by simp [add_comm, map_vadd f]⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : ⇑(0 : P1 →ᵃ[k] V2) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add (f g : P1 →ᵃ[k] V2) : ⇑(f + g) = f + g :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_neg (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] V2) : ⇑(-f) = -f :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub (f g : P1 →ᵃ[k] V2) : ⇑(f - g) = f - g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_linear : (0 : P1 →ᵃ[k] V2).linear = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_linear (f g : P1 →ᵃ[k] V2) : (f + g).linear = f.linear + g.linear :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sub_linear (f g : P1 →ᵃ[k] V2) : (f - g).linear = f.linear - g.linear :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem neg_linear (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] V2) : (-f).linear = -f.linear :=
rfl
/-- The set of affine maps to a vector space is an additive commutative group. -/
instance : AddCommGroup (P1 →ᵃ[k] V2) :=
coeFn_injective.addCommGroup _ coe_zero coe_add coe_neg coe_sub (fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _)
fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _
/-- The space of affine maps from `P1` to `P2` is an affine space over the space of affine maps
from `P1` to the vector space `V2` corresponding to `P2`. -/
instance : AffineSpace (P1 →ᵃ[k] V2) (P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) where
vadd f g :=
⟨fun p => f p +ᵥ g p, f.linear + g.linear,
fun p v => by simp [vadd_vadd, add_right_comm]⟩
zero_vadd f := ext fun p => zero_vadd _ (f p)
add_vadd f₁ f₂ f₃ := ext fun p => add_vadd (f₁ p) (f₂ p) (f₃ p)
vsub f g :=
⟨fun p => f p -ᵥ g p, f.linear - g.linear, fun p v => by
simp [vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vadd_vsub_assoc, add_sub, sub_add_eq_add_sub]⟩
vsub_vadd' f g := ext fun p => vsub_vadd (f p) (g p)
vadd_vsub' f g := ext fun p => vadd_vsub (f p) (g p)
@[simp]
theorem vadd_apply (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] V2) (g : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) (p : P1) : (f +ᵥ g) p = f p +ᵥ g p :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem vsub_apply (f g : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) (p : P1) : (f -ᵥ g : P1 →ᵃ[k] V2) p = f p -ᵥ g p :=
rfl
/-- `Prod.fst` as an `AffineMap`. -/
def fst : P1 × P2 →ᵃ[k] P1 where
toFun := Prod.fst
linear := LinearMap.fst k V1 V2
map_vadd' _ _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_fst : ⇑(fst : P1 × P2 →ᵃ[k] P1) = Prod.fst :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_linear : (fst : P1 × P2 →ᵃ[k] P1).linear = LinearMap.fst k V1 V2 :=
rfl
/-- `Prod.snd` as an `AffineMap`. -/
def snd : P1 × P2 →ᵃ[k] P2 where
toFun := Prod.snd
linear := LinearMap.snd k V1 V2
map_vadd' _ _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_snd : ⇑(snd : P1 × P2 →ᵃ[k] P2) = Prod.snd :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_linear : (snd : P1 × P2 →ᵃ[k] P2).linear = LinearMap.snd k V1 V2 :=
rfl
variable (k P1)
/-- Identity map as an affine map. -/
nonrec def id : P1 →ᵃ[k] P1 where
toFun := id
linear := LinearMap.id
map_vadd' _ _ := rfl
/-- The identity affine map acts as the identity. -/
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_id : ⇑(id k P1) = _root_.id :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem id_linear : (id k P1).linear = LinearMap.id :=
rfl
variable {P1}
/-- The identity affine map acts as the identity. -/
theorem id_apply (p : P1) : id k P1 p = p :=
rfl
variable {k}
instance : Inhabited (P1 →ᵃ[k] P1) :=
⟨id k P1⟩
/-- Composition of affine maps. -/
def comp (f : P2 →ᵃ[k] P3) (g : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) : P1 →ᵃ[k] P3 where
toFun := f ∘ g
linear := f.linear.comp g.linear
map_vadd' := by
intro p v
rw [Function.comp_apply, g.map_vadd, f.map_vadd]
rfl
/-- Composition of affine maps acts as applying the two functions. -/
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp (f : P2 →ᵃ[k] P3) (g : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) : ⇑(f.comp g) = f ∘ g :=
rfl
/-- Composition of affine maps acts as applying the two functions. -/
theorem comp_apply (f : P2 →ᵃ[k] P3) (g : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) (p : P1) : f.comp g p = f (g p) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_id (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) : f.comp (id k P1) = f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem id_comp (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) : (id k P2).comp f = f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem comp_assoc (f₃₄ : P3 →ᵃ[k] P4) (f₂₃ : P2 →ᵃ[k] P3) (f₁₂ : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) :
(f₃₄.comp f₂₃).comp f₁₂ = f₃₄.comp (f₂₃.comp f₁₂) :=
rfl
instance : Monoid (P1 →ᵃ[k] P1) where
one := id k P1
mul := comp
one_mul := id_comp
mul_one := comp_id
mul_assoc := comp_assoc
@[simp]
theorem coe_mul (f g : P1 →ᵃ[k] P1) : ⇑(f * g) = f ∘ g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_one : ⇑(1 : P1 →ᵃ[k] P1) = _root_.id :=
rfl
/-- `AffineMap.linear` on endomorphisms is a `MonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def linearHom : (P1 →ᵃ[k] P1) →* V1 →ₗ[k] V1 where
toFun := linear
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' _ _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem linear_injective_iff (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) :
Function.Injective f.linear ↔ Function.Injective f := by
obtain ⟨p⟩ := (inferInstance : Nonempty P1)
have h : ⇑f.linear = (Equiv.vaddConst (f p)).symm ∘ f ∘ Equiv.vaddConst p := by
ext v
simp [f.map_vadd, vadd_vsub_assoc]
rw [h, Equiv.comp_injective, Equiv.injective_comp]
@[simp]
theorem linear_surjective_iff (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) :
Function.Surjective f.linear ↔ Function.Surjective f := by
obtain ⟨p⟩ := (inferInstance : Nonempty P1)
have h : ⇑f.linear = (Equiv.vaddConst (f p)).symm ∘ f ∘ Equiv.vaddConst p := by
ext v
simp [f.map_vadd, vadd_vsub_assoc]
rw [h, Equiv.comp_surjective, Equiv.surjective_comp]
@[simp]
theorem linear_bijective_iff (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) :
Function.Bijective f.linear ↔ Function.Bijective f :=
and_congr f.linear_injective_iff f.linear_surjective_iff
theorem image_vsub_image {s t : Set P1} (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) :
f '' s -ᵥ f '' t = f.linear '' (s -ᵥ t) := by
ext v
simp only [Set.mem_vsub, Set.mem_image,
exists_exists_and_eq_and, exists_and_left, ← f.linearMap_vsub]
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hv⟩
exact ⟨x -ᵥ y, ⟨x, hx, y, hy, rfl⟩, hv⟩
· rintro ⟨-, ⟨x, hx, y, hy, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨x, hx, y, hy, rfl⟩
/-! ### Definition of `AffineMap.lineMap` and lemmas about it -/
/-- The affine map from `k` to `P1` sending `0` to `p₀` and `1` to `p₁`. -/
def lineMap (p₀ p₁ : P1) : k →ᵃ[k] P1 :=
((LinearMap.id : k →ₗ[k] k).smulRight (p₁ -ᵥ p₀)).toAffineMap +ᵥ const k k p₀
theorem coe_lineMap (p₀ p₁ : P1) : (lineMap p₀ p₁ : k → P1) = fun c => c • (p₁ -ᵥ p₀) +ᵥ p₀ :=
rfl
theorem lineMap_apply (p₀ p₁ : P1) (c : k) : lineMap p₀ p₁ c = c • (p₁ -ᵥ p₀) +ᵥ p₀ :=
rfl
theorem lineMap_apply_module' (p₀ p₁ : V1) (c : k) : lineMap p₀ p₁ c = c • (p₁ - p₀) + p₀ :=
rfl
theorem lineMap_apply_module (p₀ p₁ : V1) (c : k) : lineMap p₀ p₁ c = (1 - c) • p₀ + c • p₁ := by
simp [lineMap_apply_module', smul_sub, sub_smul]; abel
theorem lineMap_apply_ring' (a b c : k) : lineMap a b c = c * (b - a) + a :=
rfl
theorem lineMap_apply_ring (a b c : k) : lineMap a b c = (1 - c) * a + c * b :=
lineMap_apply_module a b c
theorem lineMap_vadd_apply (p : P1) (v : V1) (c : k) : lineMap p (v +ᵥ p) c = c • v +ᵥ p := by
rw [lineMap_apply, vadd_vsub]
@[simp]
theorem lineMap_linear (p₀ p₁ : P1) :
(lineMap p₀ p₁ : k →ᵃ[k] P1).linear = LinearMap.id.smulRight (p₁ -ᵥ p₀) :=
add_zero _
theorem lineMap_same_apply (p : P1) (c : k) : lineMap p p c = p := by
simp [lineMap_apply]
@[simp]
theorem lineMap_same (p : P1) : lineMap p p = const k k p :=
ext <| lineMap_same_apply p
@[simp]
theorem lineMap_apply_zero (p₀ p₁ : P1) : lineMap p₀ p₁ (0 : k) = p₀ := by
simp [lineMap_apply]
@[simp]
theorem lineMap_apply_one (p₀ p₁ : P1) : lineMap p₀ p₁ (1 : k) = p₁ := by
simp [lineMap_apply]
@[simp]
theorem lineMap_eq_lineMap_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors k V1] {p₀ p₁ : P1} {c₁ c₂ : k} :
lineMap p₀ p₁ c₁ = lineMap p₀ p₁ c₂ ↔ p₀ = p₁ ∨ c₁ = c₂ := by
rw [lineMap_apply, lineMap_apply, ← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V1, vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_right, ←
sub_smul, smul_eq_zero, sub_eq_zero, vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq, or_comm, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem lineMap_eq_left_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors k V1] {p₀ p₁ : P1} {c : k} :
lineMap p₀ p₁ c = p₀ ↔ p₀ = p₁ ∨ c = 0 := by
rw [← @lineMap_eq_lineMap_iff k V1, lineMap_apply_zero]
@[simp]
theorem lineMap_eq_right_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors k V1] {p₀ p₁ : P1} {c : k} :
lineMap p₀ p₁ c = p₁ ↔ p₀ = p₁ ∨ c = 1 := by
rw [← @lineMap_eq_lineMap_iff k V1, lineMap_apply_one]
variable (k) in
theorem lineMap_injective [NoZeroSMulDivisors k V1] {p₀ p₁ : P1} (h : p₀ ≠ p₁) :
Function.Injective (lineMap p₀ p₁ : k → P1) := fun _c₁ _c₂ hc =>
(lineMap_eq_lineMap_iff.mp hc).resolve_left h
@[simp]
theorem apply_lineMap (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) (p₀ p₁ : P1) (c : k) :
f (lineMap p₀ p₁ c) = lineMap (f p₀) (f p₁) c := by
simp [lineMap_apply]
@[simp]
theorem comp_lineMap (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) (p₀ p₁ : P1) :
f.comp (lineMap p₀ p₁) = lineMap (f p₀) (f p₁) :=
ext <| f.apply_lineMap p₀ p₁
@[simp]
theorem fst_lineMap (p₀ p₁ : P1 × P2) (c : k) : (lineMap p₀ p₁ c).1 = lineMap p₀.1 p₁.1 c :=
fst.apply_lineMap p₀ p₁ c
@[simp]
theorem snd_lineMap (p₀ p₁ : P1 × P2) (c : k) : (lineMap p₀ p₁ c).2 = lineMap p₀.2 p₁.2 c :=
snd.apply_lineMap p₀ p₁ c
theorem lineMap_symm (p₀ p₁ : P1) :
lineMap p₀ p₁ = (lineMap p₁ p₀).comp (lineMap (1 : k) (0 : k)) := by
rw [comp_lineMap]
simp
theorem lineMap_apply_one_sub (p₀ p₁ : P1) (c : k) : lineMap p₀ p₁ (1 - c) = lineMap p₁ p₀ c := by
rw [lineMap_symm p₀, comp_apply]
congr
simp [lineMap_apply]
@[simp]
theorem lineMap_vsub_left (p₀ p₁ : P1) (c : k) : lineMap p₀ p₁ c -ᵥ p₀ = c • (p₁ -ᵥ p₀) :=
vadd_vsub _ _
@[simp]
theorem left_vsub_lineMap (p₀ p₁ : P1) (c : k) : p₀ -ᵥ lineMap p₀ p₁ c = c • (p₀ -ᵥ p₁) := by
rw [← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, lineMap_vsub_left, ← smul_neg, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
@[simp]
theorem lineMap_vsub_right (p₀ p₁ : P1) (c : k) : lineMap p₀ p₁ c -ᵥ p₁ = (1 - c) • (p₀ -ᵥ p₁) := by
rw [← lineMap_apply_one_sub, lineMap_vsub_left]
@[simp]
theorem right_vsub_lineMap (p₀ p₁ : P1) (c : k) : p₁ -ᵥ lineMap p₀ p₁ c = (1 - c) • (p₁ -ᵥ p₀) := by
rw [← lineMap_apply_one_sub, left_vsub_lineMap]
theorem lineMap_vadd_lineMap (v₁ v₂ : V1) (p₁ p₂ : P1) (c : k) :
lineMap v₁ v₂ c +ᵥ lineMap p₁ p₂ c = lineMap (v₁ +ᵥ p₁) (v₂ +ᵥ p₂) c :=
((fst : V1 × P1 →ᵃ[k] V1) +ᵥ (snd : V1 × P1 →ᵃ[k] P1)).apply_lineMap (v₁, p₁) (v₂, p₂) c
theorem lineMap_vsub_lineMap (p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ : P1) (c : k) :
lineMap p₁ p₂ c -ᵥ lineMap p₃ p₄ c = lineMap (p₁ -ᵥ p₃) (p₂ -ᵥ p₄) c :=
((fst : P1 × P1 →ᵃ[k] P1) -ᵥ (snd : P1 × P1 →ᵃ[k] P1)).apply_lineMap (_, _) (_, _) c
@[simp] lemma lineMap_lineMap_right (p₀ p₁ : P1) (c d : k) :
lineMap p₀ (lineMap p₀ p₁ c) d = lineMap p₀ p₁ (d * c) := by simp [lineMap_apply, mul_smul]
@[simp] lemma lineMap_lineMap_left (p₀ p₁ : P1) (c d : k) :
lineMap (lineMap p₀ p₁ c) p₁ d = lineMap p₀ p₁ (1 - (1 - d) * (1 - c)) := by
simp_rw [lineMap_apply_one_sub, ← lineMap_apply_one_sub p₁, lineMap_lineMap_right]
/-- Decomposition of an affine map in the special case when the point space and vector space
are the same. -/
theorem decomp (f : V1 →ᵃ[k] V2) : (f : V1 → V2) = ⇑f.linear + fun _ => f 0 := by
ext x
calc
f x = f.linear x +ᵥ f 0 := by rw [← f.map_vadd, vadd_eq_add, add_zero]
_ = (f.linear + fun _ : V1 => f 0) x := rfl
/-- Decomposition of an affine map in the special case when the point space and vector space
are the same. -/
theorem decomp' (f : V1 →ᵃ[k] V2) : (f.linear : V1 → V2) = ⇑f - fun _ => f 0 := by
rw [decomp]
simp only [LinearMap.map_zero, Pi.add_apply, add_sub_cancel_right, zero_add]
theorem image_uIcc {k : Type*} [Field k] [LinearOrder k] [IsStrictOrderedRing k]
(f : k →ᵃ[k] k) (a b : k) :
f '' Set.uIcc a b = Set.uIcc (f a) (f b) := by
have : ⇑f = (fun x => x + f 0) ∘ fun x => x * (f 1 - f 0) := by
ext x
change f x = x • (f 1 -ᵥ f 0) +ᵥ f 0
rw [← f.linearMap_vsub, ← f.linear.map_smul, ← f.map_vadd]
simp only [vsub_eq_sub, add_zero, mul_one, vadd_eq_add, sub_zero, smul_eq_mul]
rw [this, Set.image_comp]
simp only [Set.image_add_const_uIcc, Set.image_mul_const_uIcc, Function.comp_apply]
section
variable {ι : Type*} {V : ι → Type*} {P : ι → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommGroup (V i)]
[∀ i, Module k (V i)] [∀ i, AddTorsor (V i) (P i)]
/-- Evaluation at a point as an affine map. -/
def proj (i : ι) : (∀ i : ι, P i) →ᵃ[k] P i where
toFun f := f i
linear := @LinearMap.proj k ι _ V _ _ i
map_vadd' _ _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem proj_apply (i : ι) (f : ∀ i, P i) : @proj k _ ι V P _ _ _ i f = f i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem proj_linear (i : ι) : (@proj k _ ι V P _ _ _ i).linear = @LinearMap.proj k ι _ V _ _ i :=
rfl
theorem pi_lineMap_apply (f g : ∀ i, P i) (c : k) (i : ι) :
lineMap f g c i = lineMap (f i) (g i) c :=
(proj i : (∀ i, P i) →ᵃ[k] P i).apply_lineMap f g c
end
end AffineMap
namespace AffineMap
variable {R k V1 P1 V2 P2 V3 P3 : Type*}
section Ring
variable [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V1] [AffineSpace V1 P1] [AddCommGroup V2] [AffineSpace V2 P2]
variable [AddCommGroup V3] [AffineSpace V3 P3] [Module k V1] [Module k V2] [Module k V3]
section DistribMulAction
variable [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R V2] [SMulCommClass k R V2]
/-- The space of affine maps to a module inherits an `R`-action from the action on its codomain. -/
instance distribMulAction : DistribMulAction R (P1 →ᵃ[k] V2) where
smul_add _ _ _ := ext fun _ => smul_add _ _ _
smul_zero _ := ext fun _ => smul_zero _
end DistribMulAction
section Module
variable [Semiring R] [Module R V2] [SMulCommClass k R V2]
/-- The space of affine maps taking values in an `R`-module is an `R`-module. -/
instance : Module R (P1 →ᵃ[k] V2) :=
{ AffineMap.distribMulAction with
add_smul := fun _ _ _ => ext fun _ => add_smul _ _ _
zero_smul := fun _ => ext fun _ => zero_smul _ _ }
variable (R)
/-- The space of affine maps between two modules is linearly equivalent to the product of the
domain with the space of linear maps, by taking the value of the affine map at `(0 : V1)` and the
linear part.
See note [bundled maps over different rings] -/
@[simps]
def toConstProdLinearMap : (V1 →ᵃ[k] V2) ≃ₗ[R] V2 × (V1 →ₗ[k] V2) where
toFun f := ⟨f 0, f.linear⟩
invFun p := p.2.toAffineMap + const k V1 p.1
left_inv f := by
ext
rw [f.decomp]
simp [const_apply]
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨v, f⟩
ext <;> simp [const_apply, const_linear]
map_add' := by simp
map_smul' := by simp
end Module
section Pi
variable {ι : Type*} {φv φp : ι → Type*} [(i : ι) → AddCommGroup (φv i)]
[(i : ι) → Module k (φv i)] [(i : ι) → AffineSpace (φv i) (φp i)]
/-- `pi` construction for affine maps. From a family of affine maps it produces an affine
map into a family of affine spaces.
This is the affine version of `LinearMap.pi`.
-/
def pi (f : (i : ι) → (P1 →ᵃ[k] φp i)) : P1 →ᵃ[k] ((i : ι) → φp i) where
toFun m a := f a m
linear := LinearMap.pi (fun a ↦ (f a).linear)
map_vadd' _ _ := funext fun _ ↦ map_vadd _ _ _
--fp for when the image is a dependent AffineSpace φp i, fv for when the
--image is a Module φv i, f' for when the image isn't dependent.
variable (fp : (i : ι) → (P1 →ᵃ[k] φp i)) (fv : (i : ι) → (P1 →ᵃ[k] φv i))
(f' : ι → P1 →ᵃ[k] P2)
@[simp]
theorem pi_apply (c : P1) (i : ι) : pi fp c i = fp i c :=
rfl
theorem pi_comp (g : P3 →ᵃ[k] P1) : (pi fp).comp g = pi (fun i => (fp i).comp g) :=
rfl
theorem pi_eq_zero : pi fv = 0 ↔ ∀ i, fv i = 0 := by
simp only [AffineMap.ext_iff, funext_iff, pi_apply]
exact forall_comm
theorem pi_zero : pi (fun _ ↦ 0 : (i : ι) → P1 →ᵃ[k] φv i) = 0 := by
ext; rfl
theorem proj_pi (i : ι) : (proj i).comp (pi fp) = fp i :=
ext fun _ => rfl
section Ext
variable [Finite ι] [DecidableEq ι] {f g : ((i : ι) → φv i) →ᵃ[k] P2}
/-- Two affine maps from a Pi-type of modules `(i : ι) → φv i` are equal if they are equal in their
operation on `Pi.single` and at zero. Analogous to `LinearMap.pi_ext`. See also `pi_ext_nonempty`,
which instead of agreement at zero requires `Nonempty ι`. -/
theorem pi_ext_zero (h : ∀ i x, f (Pi.single i x) = g (Pi.single i x)) (h₂ : f 0 = g 0) :
f = g := by
apply ext_linear
· apply LinearMap.pi_ext
intro i x
have s₁ := h i x
have s₂ := f.map_vadd 0 (Pi.single i x)
have s₃ := g.map_vadd 0 (Pi.single i x)
rw [vadd_eq_add, add_zero] at s₂ s₃
replace h₂ := h i 0
simp only [Pi.single_zero] at h₂
rwa [s₂, s₃, h₂, vadd_right_cancel_iff] at s₁
· exact h₂
/-- Two affine maps from a Pi-type of modules `(i : ι) → φv i` are equal if they are equal in their
operation on `Pi.single` and `ι` is nonempty. Analogous to `LinearMap.pi_ext`. See also
`pi_ext_zero`, which instead of `Nonempty ι` requires agreement at 0. -/
theorem pi_ext_nonempty [Nonempty ι] (h : ∀ i x, f (Pi.single i x) = g (Pi.single i x)) :
f = g := by
apply pi_ext_zero h
inhabit ι
rw [← Pi.single_zero default]
apply h
/-- This is used as the ext lemma instead of `AffineMap.pi_ext_nonempty` for reasons explained in
note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. Analogous to `LinearMap.pi_ext'` -/
@[ext (iff := false)]
theorem pi_ext_nonempty' [Nonempty ι] (h : ∀ i, f.comp (LinearMap.single _ _ i).toAffineMap =
g.comp (LinearMap.single _ _ i).toAffineMap) : f = g := by
refine pi_ext_nonempty fun i x => ?_
convert AffineMap.congr_fun (h i) x
end Ext
end Pi
end Ring
section CommRing
variable [CommRing k] [AddCommGroup V1] [AffineSpace V1 P1] [AddCommGroup V2]
variable [Module k V1] [Module k V2]
/-- `homothety c r` is the homothety (also known as dilation) about `c` with scale factor `r`. -/
def homothety (c : P1) (r : k) : P1 →ᵃ[k] P1 :=
r • (id k P1 -ᵥ const k P1 c) +ᵥ const k P1 c
theorem homothety_def (c : P1) (r : k) :
homothety c r = r • (id k P1 -ᵥ const k P1 c) +ᵥ const k P1 c :=
rfl
theorem homothety_apply (c : P1) (r : k) (p : P1) : homothety c r p = r • (p -ᵥ c : V1) +ᵥ c :=
rfl
theorem homothety_eq_lineMap (c : P1) (r : k) (p : P1) : homothety c r p = lineMap c p r :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem homothety_one (c : P1) : homothety c (1 : k) = id k P1 := by
ext p
simp [homothety_apply]
@[simp]
theorem homothety_apply_same (c : P1) (r : k) : homothety c r c = c :=
lineMap_same_apply c r
theorem homothety_mul_apply (c : P1) (r₁ r₂ : k) (p : P1) :
homothety c (r₁ * r₂) p = homothety c r₁ (homothety c r₂ p) := by
simp only [homothety_apply, mul_smul, vadd_vsub]
theorem homothety_mul (c : P1) (r₁ r₂ : k) :
homothety c (r₁ * r₂) = (homothety c r₁).comp (homothety c r₂) :=
ext <| homothety_mul_apply c r₁ r₂
@[simp]
theorem homothety_zero (c : P1) : homothety c (0 : k) = const k P1 c := by
ext p
simp [homothety_apply]
@[simp]
theorem homothety_add (c : P1) (r₁ r₂ : k) :
homothety c (r₁ + r₂) = r₁ • (id k P1 -ᵥ const k P1 c) +ᵥ homothety c r₂ := by
simp only [homothety_def, add_smul, vadd_vadd]
/-- `homothety` as a multiplicative monoid homomorphism. -/
def homothetyHom (c : P1) : k →* P1 →ᵃ[k] P1 where
toFun := homothety c
map_one' := homothety_one c
map_mul' := homothety_mul c
@[simp]
theorem coe_homothetyHom (c : P1) : ⇑(homothetyHom c : k →* _) = homothety c :=
rfl
/-- `homothety` as an affine map. -/
def homothetyAffine (c : P1) : k →ᵃ[k] P1 →ᵃ[k] P1 :=
⟨homothety c, (LinearMap.lsmul k _).flip (id k P1 -ᵥ const k P1 c),
Function.swap (homothety_add c)⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_homothetyAffine (c : P1) : ⇑(homothetyAffine c : k →ᵃ[k] _) = homothety c :=
rfl
end CommRing
end AffineMap
section
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*} [Ring 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup F] [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 F]
/-- Applying an affine map to an affine combination of two points yields an affine combination of
the images. -/
theorem Convex.combo_affine_apply {x y : E} {a b : 𝕜} {f : E →ᵃ[𝕜] F} (h : a + b = 1) :
f (a • x + b • y) = a • f x + b • f y := by
simp only [Convex.combo_eq_smul_sub_add h, ← vsub_eq_sub]
exact f.apply_lineMap _ _ _
end
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/AffineSpace/AffineMap.lean | 903 | 905 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.Algebra
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
/-!
# The Pochhammer polynomials
We define and prove some basic relations about
`ascPochhammer S n : S[X] := X * (X + 1) * ... * (X + n - 1)`
which is also known as the rising factorial and about
`descPochhammer R n : R[X] := X * (X - 1) * ... * (X - n + 1)`
which is also known as the falling factorial. Versions of this definition
that are focused on `Nat` can be found in `Data.Nat.Factorial` as `Nat.ascFactorial` and
`Nat.descFactorial`.
## Implementation
As with many other families of polynomials, even though the coefficients are always in `ℕ` or `ℤ` ,
we define the polynomial with coefficients in any `[Semiring S]` or `[Ring R]`.
In an integral domain `S`, we show that `ascPochhammer S n` is zero iff
`n` is a sufficiently large non-positive integer.
## TODO
There is lots more in this direction:
* q-factorials, q-binomials, q-Pochhammer.
-/
universe u v
open Polynomial
section Semiring
variable (S : Type u) [Semiring S]
/-- `ascPochhammer S n` is the polynomial `X * (X + 1) * ... * (X + n - 1)`,
with coefficients in the semiring `S`.
-/
noncomputable def ascPochhammer : ℕ → S[X]
| 0 => 1
| n + 1 => X * (ascPochhammer n).comp (X + 1)
@[simp]
theorem ascPochhammer_zero : ascPochhammer S 0 = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ascPochhammer_one : ascPochhammer S 1 = X := by simp [ascPochhammer]
theorem ascPochhammer_succ_left (n : ℕ) :
ascPochhammer S (n + 1) = X * (ascPochhammer S n).comp (X + 1) := by
rw [ascPochhammer]
theorem monic_ascPochhammer (n : ℕ) [Nontrivial S] [NoZeroDivisors S] :
Monic <| ascPochhammer S n := by
induction' n with n hn
· simp
· have : leadingCoeff (X + 1 : S[X]) = 1 := leadingCoeff_X_add_C 1
rw [ascPochhammer_succ_left, Monic.def, leadingCoeff_mul,
leadingCoeff_comp (ne_zero_of_eq_one <| natDegree_X_add_C 1 : natDegree (X + 1) ≠ 0), hn,
monic_X, one_mul, one_mul, this, one_pow]
section
variable {S} {T : Type v} [Semiring T]
@[simp]
theorem ascPochhammer_map (f : S →+* T) (n : ℕ) :
(ascPochhammer S n).map f = ascPochhammer T n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => simp [ih, ascPochhammer_succ_left, map_comp]
theorem ascPochhammer_eval₂ (f : S →+* T) (n : ℕ) (t : T) :
(ascPochhammer T n).eval t = (ascPochhammer S n).eval₂ f t := by
rw [← ascPochhammer_map f]
exact eval_map f t
theorem ascPochhammer_eval_comp {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (n : ℕ) (p : R[X]) [Algebra R S]
(x : S) : ((ascPochhammer S n).comp (p.map (algebraMap R S))).eval x =
(ascPochhammer S n).eval (p.eval₂ (algebraMap R S) x) := by
rw [ascPochhammer_eval₂ (algebraMap R S), ← eval₂_comp', ← ascPochhammer_map (algebraMap R S),
← map_comp, eval_map]
end
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ascPochhammer_eval_cast (n k : ℕ) :
(((ascPochhammer ℕ n).eval k : ℕ) : S) = ((ascPochhammer S n).eval k : S) := by
rw [← ascPochhammer_map (algebraMap ℕ S), eval_map, ← eq_natCast (algebraMap ℕ S),
eval₂_at_natCast,Nat.cast_id]
theorem ascPochhammer_eval_zero {n : ℕ} : (ascPochhammer S n).eval 0 = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 := by
cases n
· simp
· simp [X_mul, Nat.succ_ne_zero, ascPochhammer_succ_left]
theorem ascPochhammer_zero_eval_zero : (ascPochhammer S 0).eval 0 = 1 := by simp
@[simp]
theorem ascPochhammer_ne_zero_eval_zero {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) : (ascPochhammer S n).eval 0 = 0 := by
simp [ascPochhammer_eval_zero, h]
theorem ascPochhammer_succ_right (n : ℕ) :
ascPochhammer S (n + 1) = ascPochhammer S n * (X + (n : S[X])) := by
suffices h : ascPochhammer ℕ (n + 1) = ascPochhammer ℕ n * (X + (n : ℕ[X])) by
apply_fun Polynomial.map (algebraMap ℕ S) at h
simpa only [ascPochhammer_map, Polynomial.map_mul, Polynomial.map_add, map_X,
Polynomial.map_natCast] using h
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
conv_lhs =>
rw [ascPochhammer_succ_left, ih, mul_comp, ← mul_assoc, ← ascPochhammer_succ_left, add_comp,
X_comp, natCast_comp, add_assoc, add_comm (1 : ℕ[X]), ← Nat.cast_succ]
theorem ascPochhammer_succ_eval {S : Type*} [Semiring S] (n : ℕ) (k : S) :
(ascPochhammer S (n + 1)).eval k = (ascPochhammer S n).eval k * (k + n) := by
rw [ascPochhammer_succ_right, mul_add, eval_add, eval_mul_X, ← Nat.cast_comm, ← C_eq_natCast,
eval_C_mul, Nat.cast_comm, ← mul_add]
theorem ascPochhammer_succ_comp_X_add_one (n : ℕ) :
(ascPochhammer S (n + 1)).comp (X + 1) =
ascPochhammer S (n + 1) + (n + 1) • (ascPochhammer S n).comp (X + 1) := by
suffices (ascPochhammer ℕ (n + 1)).comp (X + 1) =
ascPochhammer ℕ (n + 1) + (n + 1) * (ascPochhammer ℕ n).comp (X + 1)
by simpa [map_comp] using congr_arg (Polynomial.map (Nat.castRingHom S)) this
nth_rw 2 [ascPochhammer_succ_left]
rw [← add_mul, ascPochhammer_succ_right ℕ n, mul_comp, mul_comm, add_comp, X_comp, natCast_comp,
add_comm, ← add_assoc]
ring
theorem ascPochhammer_mul (n m : ℕ) :
ascPochhammer S n * (ascPochhammer S m).comp (X + (n : S[X])) = ascPochhammer S (n + m) := by
induction' m with m ih
· simp
· rw [ascPochhammer_succ_right, Polynomial.mul_X_add_natCast_comp, ← mul_assoc, ih,
← add_assoc, ascPochhammer_succ_right, Nat.cast_add, add_assoc]
theorem ascPochhammer_nat_eq_ascFactorial (n : ℕ) :
∀ k, (ascPochhammer ℕ k).eval n = n.ascFactorial k
| 0 => by rw [ascPochhammer_zero, eval_one, Nat.ascFactorial_zero]
| t + 1 => by
rw [ascPochhammer_succ_right, eval_mul, ascPochhammer_nat_eq_ascFactorial n t, eval_add, eval_X,
eval_natCast, Nat.cast_id, Nat.ascFactorial_succ, mul_comm]
theorem ascPochhammer_nat_eq_natCast_ascFactorial (S : Type*) [Semiring S] (n k : ℕ) :
(ascPochhammer S k).eval (n : S) = n.ascFactorial k := by
norm_cast
rw [ascPochhammer_nat_eq_ascFactorial]
theorem ascPochhammer_nat_eq_descFactorial (a b : ℕ) :
(ascPochhammer ℕ b).eval a = (a + b - 1).descFactorial b := by
rw [ascPochhammer_nat_eq_ascFactorial, Nat.add_descFactorial_eq_ascFactorial']
theorem ascPochhammer_nat_eq_natCast_descFactorial (S : Type*) [Semiring S] (a b : ℕ) :
(ascPochhammer S b).eval (a : S) = (a + b - 1).descFactorial b := by
norm_cast
rw [ascPochhammer_nat_eq_descFactorial]
@[simp]
theorem ascPochhammer_natDegree (n : ℕ) [NoZeroDivisors S] [Nontrivial S] :
(ascPochhammer S n).natDegree = n := by
induction' n with n hn
· simp
· have : natDegree (X + (n : S[X])) = 1 := natDegree_X_add_C (n : S)
rw [ascPochhammer_succ_right,
natDegree_mul _ (ne_zero_of_natDegree_gt <| this.symm ▸ Nat.zero_lt_one), hn, this]
cases n
· simp
· refine ne_zero_of_natDegree_gt <| hn.symm ▸ Nat.add_one_pos _
end Semiring
section StrictOrderedSemiring
variable {S : Type*} [Semiring S] [PartialOrder S] [IsStrictOrderedRing S]
theorem ascPochhammer_pos (n : ℕ) (s : S) (h : 0 < s) : 0 < (ascPochhammer S n).eval s := by
induction n with
| zero =>
simp only [ascPochhammer_zero, eval_one]
exact zero_lt_one
| succ n ih =>
rw [ascPochhammer_succ_right, mul_add, eval_add, ← Nat.cast_comm, eval_natCast_mul, eval_mul_X,
Nat.cast_comm, ← mul_add]
exact mul_pos ih (lt_of_lt_of_le h (le_add_of_nonneg_right (Nat.cast_nonneg n)))
end StrictOrderedSemiring
section Factorial
open Nat
variable (S : Type*) [Semiring S] (r n : ℕ)
@[simp]
theorem ascPochhammer_eval_one (S : Type*) [Semiring S] (n : ℕ) :
(ascPochhammer S n).eval (1 : S) = (n ! : S) := by
rw_mod_cast [ascPochhammer_nat_eq_ascFactorial, Nat.one_ascFactorial]
theorem factorial_mul_ascPochhammer (S : Type*) [Semiring S] (r n : ℕ) :
(r ! : S) * (ascPochhammer S n).eval (r + 1 : S) = (r + n)! := by
rw_mod_cast [ascPochhammer_nat_eq_ascFactorial, Nat.factorial_mul_ascFactorial]
theorem ascPochhammer_nat_eval_succ (r : ℕ) :
∀ n : ℕ, n * (ascPochhammer ℕ r).eval (n + 1) = (n + r) * (ascPochhammer ℕ r).eval n
| 0 => by
by_cases h : r = 0
· simp only [h, zero_mul, zero_add]
· simp only [ascPochhammer_eval_zero, zero_mul, if_neg h, mul_zero]
| k + 1 => by simp only [ascPochhammer_nat_eq_ascFactorial, Nat.succ_ascFactorial, add_right_comm]
theorem ascPochhammer_eval_succ (r n : ℕ) :
(n : S) * (ascPochhammer S r).eval (n + 1 : S) =
(n + r) * (ascPochhammer S r).eval (n : S) :=
mod_cast congr_arg Nat.cast (ascPochhammer_nat_eval_succ r n)
end Factorial
section Ring
variable (R : Type u) [Ring R]
/-- `descPochhammer R n` is the polynomial `X * (X - 1) * ... * (X - n + 1)`,
with coefficients in the ring `R`.
-/
noncomputable def descPochhammer : ℕ → R[X]
| 0 => 1
| n + 1 => X * (descPochhammer n).comp (X - 1)
@[simp]
theorem descPochhammer_zero : descPochhammer R 0 = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem descPochhammer_one : descPochhammer R 1 = X := by simp [descPochhammer]
theorem descPochhammer_succ_left (n : ℕ) :
descPochhammer R (n + 1) = X * (descPochhammer R n).comp (X - 1) := by
rw [descPochhammer]
theorem monic_descPochhammer (n : ℕ) [Nontrivial R] [NoZeroDivisors R] :
Monic <| descPochhammer R n := by
induction' n with n hn
· simp
· have h : leadingCoeff (X - 1 : R[X]) = 1 := leadingCoeff_X_sub_C 1
have : natDegree (X - (1 : R[X])) ≠ 0 := ne_zero_of_eq_one <| natDegree_X_sub_C (1 : R)
rw [descPochhammer_succ_left, Monic.def, leadingCoeff_mul, leadingCoeff_comp this, hn, monic_X,
one_mul, one_mul, h, one_pow]
section
variable {R} {T : Type v} [Ring T]
@[simp]
theorem descPochhammer_map (f : R →+* T) (n : ℕ) :
(descPochhammer R n).map f = descPochhammer T n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => simp [ih, descPochhammer_succ_left, map_comp]
end
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem descPochhammer_eval_cast (n : ℕ) (k : ℤ) :
(((descPochhammer ℤ n).eval k : ℤ) : R) = ((descPochhammer R n).eval k : R) := by
rw [← descPochhammer_map (algebraMap ℤ R), eval_map, ← eq_intCast (algebraMap ℤ R)]
simp only [algebraMap_int_eq, eq_intCast, eval₂_at_intCast, Nat.cast_id, eq_natCast, Int.cast_id]
theorem descPochhammer_eval_zero {n : ℕ} :
(descPochhammer R n).eval 0 = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 := by
cases n
· simp
· simp [X_mul, Nat.succ_ne_zero, descPochhammer_succ_left]
theorem descPochhammer_zero_eval_zero : (descPochhammer R 0).eval 0 = 1 := by simp
@[simp]
theorem descPochhammer_ne_zero_eval_zero {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) : (descPochhammer R n).eval 0 = 0 := by
simp [descPochhammer_eval_zero, h]
theorem descPochhammer_succ_right (n : ℕ) :
descPochhammer R (n + 1) = descPochhammer R n * (X - (n : R[X])) := by
suffices h : descPochhammer ℤ (n + 1) = descPochhammer ℤ n * (X - (n : ℤ[X])) by
apply_fun Polynomial.map (algebraMap ℤ R) at h
simpa [descPochhammer_map, Polynomial.map_mul, Polynomial.map_add, map_X,
Polynomial.map_intCast] using h
induction n with
| zero => simp [descPochhammer]
| succ n ih =>
conv_lhs =>
rw [descPochhammer_succ_left, ih, mul_comp, ← mul_assoc, ← descPochhammer_succ_left, sub_comp,
X_comp, natCast_comp]
rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, sub_add_eq_sub_sub_swap]
@[simp]
theorem descPochhammer_natDegree (n : ℕ) [NoZeroDivisors R] [Nontrivial R] :
(descPochhammer R n).natDegree = n := by
induction' n with n hn
· simp
· have : natDegree (X - (n : R[X])) = 1 := natDegree_X_sub_C (n : R)
rw [descPochhammer_succ_right,
natDegree_mul _ (ne_zero_of_natDegree_gt <| this.symm ▸ Nat.zero_lt_one), hn, this]
cases n
· simp
· refine ne_zero_of_natDegree_gt <| hn.symm ▸ Nat.add_one_pos _
theorem descPochhammer_succ_eval {S : Type*} [Ring S] (n : ℕ) (k : S) :
(descPochhammer S (n + 1)).eval k = (descPochhammer S n).eval k * (k - n) := by
rw [descPochhammer_succ_right, mul_sub, eval_sub, eval_mul_X, ← Nat.cast_comm, ← C_eq_natCast,
eval_C_mul, Nat.cast_comm, ← mul_sub]
theorem descPochhammer_succ_comp_X_sub_one (n : ℕ) :
(descPochhammer R (n + 1)).comp (X - 1) =
descPochhammer R (n + 1) - (n + (1 : R[X])) • (descPochhammer R n).comp (X - 1) := by
suffices (descPochhammer ℤ (n + 1)).comp (X - 1) =
descPochhammer ℤ (n + 1) - (n + 1) * (descPochhammer ℤ n).comp (X - 1)
by simpa [map_comp] using congr_arg (Polynomial.map (Int.castRingHom R)) this
nth_rw 2 [descPochhammer_succ_left]
rw [← sub_mul, descPochhammer_succ_right ℤ n, mul_comp, mul_comm, sub_comp, X_comp, natCast_comp]
ring
theorem descPochhammer_eq_ascPochhammer (n : ℕ) :
descPochhammer ℤ n = (ascPochhammer ℤ n).comp ((X : ℤ[X]) - n + 1) := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [descPochhammer_zero, ascPochhammer_zero, one_comp]
| succ n ih =>
rw [Nat.cast_succ, sub_add, add_sub_cancel_right, descPochhammer_succ_right,
ascPochhammer_succ_left, ih, X_mul, mul_X_comp, comp_assoc, add_comp, X_comp, one_comp]
theorem descPochhammer_eval_eq_ascPochhammer (r : R) (n : ℕ) :
(descPochhammer R n).eval r = (ascPochhammer R n).eval (r - n + 1) := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [descPochhammer_zero, eval_one, ascPochhammer_zero, eval_one]
| succ n ih =>
rw [Nat.cast_succ, sub_add, add_sub_cancel_right, descPochhammer_succ_eval, ih,
ascPochhammer_succ_left, X_mul, eval_mul_X, show (X + 1 : R[X]) =
(X + 1 : ℕ[X]).map (algebraMap ℕ R) by simp only [Polynomial.map_add, map_X,
Polynomial.map_one], ascPochhammer_eval_comp, eval₂_add, eval₂_X, eval₂_one]
theorem descPochhammer_mul (n m : ℕ) :
descPochhammer R n * (descPochhammer R m).comp (X - (n : R[X])) = descPochhammer R (n + m) := by
induction' m with m ih
· simp
· rw [descPochhammer_succ_right, Polynomial.mul_X_sub_intCast_comp, ← mul_assoc, ih,
← add_assoc, descPochhammer_succ_right, Nat.cast_add, sub_add_eq_sub_sub]
theorem ascPochhammer_eval_neg_eq_descPochhammer (r : R) : ∀ (k : ℕ),
(ascPochhammer R k).eval (-r) = (-1)^k * (descPochhammer R k).eval r
| 0 => by
rw [ascPochhammer_zero, descPochhammer_zero]
simp only [eval_one, pow_zero, mul_one]
| (k+1) => by
rw [ascPochhammer_succ_right, mul_add, eval_add, eval_mul_X, ← Nat.cast_comm, eval_natCast_mul,
Nat.cast_comm, ← mul_add, ascPochhammer_eval_neg_eq_descPochhammer r k, mul_assoc,
descPochhammer_succ_right, mul_sub, eval_sub, eval_mul_X, ← Nat.cast_comm, eval_natCast_mul,
pow_add, pow_one, mul_assoc ((-1)^k) (-1), mul_sub, neg_one_mul, neg_mul_eq_mul_neg,
Nat.cast_comm, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_one_mul, neg_neg, ← mul_add]
theorem descPochhammer_eval_eq_descFactorial (n k : ℕ) :
(descPochhammer R k).eval (n : R) = n.descFactorial k := by
induction k with
| zero => rw [descPochhammer_zero, eval_one, Nat.descFactorial_zero, Nat.cast_one]
| succ k ih =>
rw [descPochhammer_succ_right, Nat.descFactorial_succ, mul_sub, eval_sub, eval_mul_X,
← Nat.cast_comm k, eval_natCast_mul, ← Nat.cast_comm n, ← sub_mul, ih]
by_cases h : n < k
· rw [Nat.descFactorial_eq_zero_iff_lt.mpr h, Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero, mul_zero, Nat.cast_zero]
· rw [Nat.cast_mul, Nat.cast_sub <| not_lt.mp h]
theorem descPochhammer_int_eq_ascFactorial (a b : ℕ) :
(descPochhammer ℤ b).eval (a + b : ℤ) = (a + 1).ascFactorial b := by
rw [← Nat.cast_add, descPochhammer_eval_eq_descFactorial ℤ (a + b) b,
Nat.add_descFactorial_eq_ascFactorial]
variable {R}
/-- The Pochhammer polynomial of degree `n` has roots at `0`, `-1`, ..., `-(n - 1)`. -/
theorem ascPochhammer_eval_neg_coe_nat_of_lt {n k : ℕ} (h : k < n) :
| (ascPochhammer R n).eval (-(k : R)) = 0 := by
induction n with
| zero => contradiction
| succ n ih =>
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Pochhammer.lean | 389 | 392 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Devon Tuma. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Devon Tuma
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.Defs
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.Lemmas
/-!
# Super-Polynomial Function Decay
This file defines a predicate `Asymptotics.SuperpolynomialDecay f` for a function satisfying
one of following equivalent definitions (The definition is in terms of the first condition):
* `x ^ n * f` tends to `𝓝 0` for all (or sufficiently large) naturals `n`
* `|x ^ n * f|` tends to `𝓝 0` for all naturals `n` (`superpolynomialDecay_iff_abs_tendsto_zero`)
* `|x ^ n * f|` is bounded for all naturals `n` (`superpolynomialDecay_iff_abs_isBoundedUnder`)
* `f` is `o(x ^ c)` for all integers `c` (`superpolynomialDecay_iff_isLittleO`)
* `f` is `O(x ^ c)` for all integers `c` (`superpolynomialDecay_iff_isBigO`)
These conditions are all equivalent to conditions in terms of polynomials, replacing `x ^ c` with
`p(x)` or `p(x)⁻¹` as appropriate, since asymptotically `p(x)` behaves like `X ^ p.natDegree`.
These further equivalences are not proven in mathlib but would be good future projects.
The definition of superpolynomial decay for `f : α → β` is relative to a parameter `k : α → β`.
Super-polynomial decay then means `f x` decays faster than `(k x) ^ c` for all integers `c`.
Equivalently `f x` decays faster than `p.eval (k x)` for all polynomials `p : β[X]`.
The definition is also relative to a filter `l : Filter α` where the decay rate is compared.
When the map `k` is given by `n ↦ ↑n : ℕ → ℝ` this defines negligible functions:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negligible_function
When the map `k` is given by `(r₁,...,rₙ) ↦ r₁*...*rₙ : ℝⁿ → ℝ` this is equivalent
to the definition of rapidly decreasing functions given here:
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/rapidly+decreasing+function
# Main Theorems
* `SuperpolynomialDecay.polynomial_mul` says that if `f(x)` is negligible,
then so is `p(x) * f(x)` for any polynomial `p`.
* `superpolynomialDecay_iff_zpow_tendsto_zero` gives an equivalence between definitions in terms
of decaying faster than `k(x) ^ n` for all naturals `n` or `k(x) ^ c` for all integer `c`.
-/
namespace Asymptotics
open Topology Polynomial
open Filter
/-- `f` has superpolynomial decay in parameter `k` along filter `l` if
`k ^ n * f` tends to zero at `l` for all naturals `n` -/
def SuperpolynomialDecay {α β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] [CommSemiring β] (l : Filter α)
(k : α → β) (f : α → β) :=
∀ n : ℕ, Tendsto (fun a : α => k a ^ n * f a) l (𝓝 0)
variable {α β : Type*} {l : Filter α} {k : α → β} {f g g' : α → β}
section CommSemiring
variable [TopologicalSpace β] [CommSemiring β]
theorem SuperpolynomialDecay.congr' (hf : SuperpolynomialDecay l k f) (hfg : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
SuperpolynomialDecay l k g := fun z =>
(hf z).congr' (EventuallyEq.mul (EventuallyEq.refl l _) hfg)
theorem SuperpolynomialDecay.congr (hf : SuperpolynomialDecay l k f) (hfg : ∀ x, f x = g x) :
SuperpolynomialDecay l k g := fun z =>
(hf z).congr fun x => (congr_arg fun a => k x ^ z * a) <| hfg x
@[simp]
theorem superpolynomialDecay_zero (l : Filter α) (k : α → β) : SuperpolynomialDecay l k 0 :=
fun z => by simpa only [Pi.zero_apply, mul_zero] using tendsto_const_nhds
theorem SuperpolynomialDecay.add [ContinuousAdd β] (hf : SuperpolynomialDecay l k f)
(hg : SuperpolynomialDecay l k g) : SuperpolynomialDecay l k (f + g) := fun z => by
simpa only [mul_add, add_zero, Pi.add_apply] using (hf z).add (hg z)
theorem SuperpolynomialDecay.mul [ContinuousMul β] (hf : SuperpolynomialDecay l k f)
(hg : SuperpolynomialDecay l k g) : SuperpolynomialDecay l k (f * g) := fun z => by
simpa only [mul_assoc, one_mul, mul_zero, pow_zero] using (hf z).mul (hg 0)
theorem SuperpolynomialDecay.mul_const [ContinuousMul β] (hf : SuperpolynomialDecay l k f) (c : β) :
SuperpolynomialDecay l k fun n => f n * c := fun z => by
simpa only [← mul_assoc, zero_mul] using Tendsto.mul_const c (hf z)
theorem SuperpolynomialDecay.const_mul [ContinuousMul β] (hf : SuperpolynomialDecay l k f) (c : β) :
| SuperpolynomialDecay l k fun n => c * f n :=
(hf.mul_const c).congr fun _ => mul_comm _ _
| Mathlib/Analysis/Asymptotics/SuperpolynomialDecay.lean | 89 | 91 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Covering.VitaliFamily
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.AEMeasurableOrder
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Average
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Decomposition.Lebesgue
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Regular
/-!
# Differentiation of measures
On a second countable metric space with a measure `μ`, consider a Vitali family (i.e., for each `x`
one has a family of sets shrinking to `x`, with a good behavior with respect to covering theorems).
Consider also another measure `ρ`. Then, for almost every `x`, the ratio `ρ a / μ a` converges when
`a` shrinks to `x` along the Vitali family, towards the Radon-Nikodym derivative of `ρ` with
respect to `μ`. This is the main theorem on differentiation of measures.
This theorem is proved in this file, under the name `VitaliFamily.ae_tendsto_rnDeriv`. Note that,
almost surely, `μ a` is eventually positive and finite (see
`VitaliFamily.ae_eventually_measure_pos` and `VitaliFamily.eventually_measure_lt_top`), so the
ratio really makes sense.
For concrete applications, one needs concrete instances of Vitali families, as provided for instance
by `Besicovitch.vitaliFamily` (for balls) or by `Vitali.vitaliFamily` (for doubling measures).
Specific applications to Lebesgue density points and the Lebesgue differentiation theorem are also
derived:
* `VitaliFamily.ae_tendsto_measure_inter_div` states that, for almost every point `x ∈ s`,
then `μ (s ∩ a) / μ a` tends to `1` as `a` shrinks to `x` along a Vitali family.
* `VitaliFamily.ae_tendsto_average_norm_sub` states that, for almost every point `x`, then the
average of `y ↦ ‖f y - f x‖` on `a` tends to `0` as `a` shrinks to `x` along a Vitali family.
## Sketch of proof
Let `v` be a Vitali family for `μ`. Assume for simplicity that `ρ` is absolutely continuous with
respect to `μ`, as the case of a singular measure is easier.
It is easy to see that a set `s` on which `liminf ρ a / μ a < q` satisfies `ρ s ≤ q * μ s`, by using
a disjoint subcovering provided by the definition of Vitali families. Similarly for the limsup.
It follows that a set on which `ρ a / μ a` oscillates has measure `0`, and therefore that
`ρ a / μ a` converges almost surely (`VitaliFamily.ae_tendsto_div`). Moreover, on a set where the
limit is close to a constant `c`, one gets `ρ s ∼ c μ s`, using again a covering lemma as above.
It follows that `ρ` is equal to `μ.withDensity (v.limRatio ρ x)`, where `v.limRatio ρ x` is the
limit of `ρ a / μ a` at `x` (which is well defined almost everywhere). By uniqueness of the
Radon-Nikodym derivative, one gets `v.limRatio ρ x = ρ.rnDeriv μ x` almost everywhere, completing
the proof.
There is a difficulty in this sketch: this argument works well when `v.limRatio ρ` is measurable,
but there is no guarantee that this is the case, especially if one doesn't make further assumptions
on the Vitali family. We use an indirect argument to show that `v.limRatio ρ` is always
almost everywhere measurable, again based on the disjoint subcovering argument
(see `VitaliFamily.exists_measurable_supersets_limRatio`), and then proceed as sketched above
but replacing `v.limRatio ρ` by a measurable version called `v.limRatioMeas ρ`.
## Counterexample
The standing assumption in this file is that spaces are second countable. Without this assumption,
measures may be zero locally but nonzero globally, which is not compatible with differentiation
theory (which deduces global information from local one). Here is an example displaying this
behavior.
Define a measure `μ` by `μ s = 0` if `s` is covered by countably many balls of radius `1`,
and `μ s = ∞` otherwise. This is indeed a countably additive measure, which is moreover
locally finite and doubling at small scales. It vanishes on every ball of radius `1`, so all the
quantities in differentiation theory (defined as ratios of measures as the radius tends to zero)
make no sense. However, the measure is not globally zero if the space is big enough.
## References
* [Herbert Federer, Geometric Measure Theory, Chapter 2.9][Federer1996]
-/
open MeasureTheory Metric Set Filter TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory.Measure
open scoped Filter ENNReal MeasureTheory NNReal Topology
variable {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
(v : VitaliFamily μ)
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
namespace VitaliFamily
/-- The limit along a Vitali family of `ρ a / μ a` where it makes sense, and garbage otherwise.
Do *not* use this definition: it is only a temporary device to show that this ratio tends almost
everywhere to the Radon-Nikodym derivative. -/
noncomputable def limRatio (ρ : Measure α) (x : α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
limUnder (v.filterAt x) fun a => ρ a / μ a
/-- For almost every point `x`, sufficiently small sets in a Vitali family around `x` have positive
measure. (This is a nontrivial result, following from the covering property of Vitali families). -/
theorem ae_eventually_measure_pos [SecondCountableTopology α] :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, 0 < μ a := by
set s := {x | ¬∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, 0 < μ a} with hs
simp -zeta only [not_lt, not_eventually, nonpos_iff_eq_zero] at hs
change μ s = 0
let f : α → Set (Set α) := fun _ => {a | μ a = 0}
have h : v.FineSubfamilyOn f s := by
intro x hx ε εpos
rw [hs] at hx
simp only [frequently_filterAt_iff, exists_prop, gt_iff_lt, mem_setOf_eq] at hx
rcases hx ε εpos with ⟨a, a_sets, ax, μa⟩
exact ⟨a, ⟨a_sets, μa⟩, ax⟩
refine le_antisymm ?_ bot_le
calc
μ s ≤ ∑' x : h.index, μ (h.covering x) := h.measure_le_tsum
_ = ∑' x : h.index, 0 := by congr; ext1 x; exact h.covering_mem x.2
_ = 0 := by simp only [tsum_zero, add_zero]
/-- For every point `x`, sufficiently small sets in a Vitali family around `x` have finite measure.
(This is a trivial result, following from the fact that the measure is locally finite). -/
theorem eventually_measure_lt_top [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] (x : α) :
∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, μ a < ∞ :=
(μ.finiteAt_nhds x).eventually.filter_mono inf_le_left
/-- If two measures `ρ` and `ν` have, at every point of a set `s`, arbitrarily small sets in a
Vitali family satisfying `ρ a ≤ ν a`, then `ρ s ≤ ν s` if `ρ ≪ μ`. -/
theorem measure_le_of_frequently_le [SecondCountableTopology α] [BorelSpace α] {ρ : Measure α}
(ν : Measure α) [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure ν] (hρ : ρ ≪ μ) (s : Set α)
(hs : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, ρ a ≤ ν a) : ρ s ≤ ν s := by
-- this follows from a covering argument using the sets satisfying `ρ a ≤ ν a`.
apply ENNReal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add fun ε εpos _ => ?_
obtain ⟨U, sU, U_open, νU⟩ : ∃ (U : Set α), s ⊆ U ∧ IsOpen U ∧ ν U ≤ ν s + ε :=
exists_isOpen_le_add s ν (ENNReal.coe_pos.2 εpos).ne'
let f : α → Set (Set α) := fun _ => {a | ρ a ≤ ν a ∧ a ⊆ U}
have h : v.FineSubfamilyOn f s := by
apply v.fineSubfamilyOn_of_frequently f s fun x hx => ?_
have :=
(hs x hx).and_eventually
((v.eventually_filterAt_mem_setsAt x).and
(v.eventually_filterAt_subset_of_nhds (U_open.mem_nhds (sU hx))))
apply Frequently.mono this
rintro a ⟨ρa, _, aU⟩
exact ⟨ρa, aU⟩
haveI : Encodable h.index := h.index_countable.toEncodable
calc
ρ s ≤ ∑' x : h.index, ρ (h.covering x) := h.measure_le_tsum_of_absolutelyContinuous hρ
_ ≤ ∑' x : h.index, ν (h.covering x) := ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun x => (h.covering_mem x.2).1
_ = ν (⋃ x : h.index, h.covering x) := by
rw [measure_iUnion h.covering_disjoint_subtype fun i => h.measurableSet_u i.2]
_ ≤ ν U := (measure_mono (iUnion_subset fun i => (h.covering_mem i.2).2))
_ ≤ ν s + ε := νU
theorem eventually_filterAt_integrableOn (x : α) {f : α → E} (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) :
∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, IntegrableOn f a μ := by
rcases hf x with ⟨w, w_nhds, hw⟩
filter_upwards [v.eventually_filterAt_subset_of_nhds w_nhds] with a ha
exact hw.mono_set ha
section
variable [SecondCountableTopology α] [BorelSpace α] [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] {ρ : Measure α}
[IsLocallyFiniteMeasure ρ]
/-- If a measure `ρ` is singular with respect to `μ`, then for `μ` almost every `x`, the ratio
`ρ a / μ a` tends to zero when `a` shrinks to `x` along the Vitali family. This makes sense
as `μ a` is eventually positive by `ae_eventually_measure_pos`. -/
theorem ae_eventually_measure_zero_of_singular (hρ : ρ ⟂ₘ μ) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun a => ρ a / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 0) := by
have A : ∀ ε > (0 : ℝ≥0), ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, ρ a < ε * μ a := by
intro ε εpos
set s := {x | ¬∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, ρ a < ε * μ a} with hs
change μ s = 0
obtain ⟨o, _, ρo, μo⟩ : ∃ o : Set α, MeasurableSet o ∧ ρ o = 0 ∧ μ oᶜ = 0 := hρ
apply le_antisymm _ bot_le
calc
μ s ≤ μ (s ∩ o ∪ oᶜ) := by
conv_lhs => rw [← inter_union_compl s o]
gcongr
apply inter_subset_right
_ ≤ μ (s ∩ o) + μ oᶜ := measure_union_le _ _
_ = μ (s ∩ o) := by rw [μo, add_zero]
_ = (ε : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ * (ε • μ) (s ∩ o) := by
simp only [coe_nnreal_smul_apply, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm _ (ε : ℝ≥0∞)]
rw [ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel (ENNReal.coe_pos.2 εpos).ne' ENNReal.coe_ne_top, one_mul]
_ ≤ (ε : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ * ρ (s ∩ o) := by
gcongr
refine v.measure_le_of_frequently_le ρ smul_absolutelyContinuous _ ?_
intro x hx
rw [hs] at hx
simp only [mem_inter_iff, not_lt, not_eventually, mem_setOf_eq] at hx
exact hx.1
_ ≤ (ε : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ * ρ o := by gcongr; apply inter_subset_right
_ = 0 := by rw [ρo, mul_zero]
obtain ⟨u, _, u_pos, u_lim⟩ :
∃ u : ℕ → ℝ≥0, StrictAnti u ∧ (∀ n : ℕ, 0 < u n) ∧ Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 0) :=
exists_seq_strictAnti_tendsto (0 : ℝ≥0)
have B : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ n, ∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, ρ a < u n * μ a :=
ae_all_iff.2 fun n => A (u n) (u_pos n)
filter_upwards [B, v.ae_eventually_measure_pos]
intro x hx h'x
refine tendsto_order.2 ⟨fun z hz => (ENNReal.not_lt_zero hz).elim, fun z hz => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨w, w_pos, w_lt⟩ : ∃ w : ℝ≥0, (0 : ℝ≥0∞) < w ∧ (w : ℝ≥0∞) < z :=
ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 hz
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, u n < w := ((tendsto_order.1 u_lim).2 w (ENNReal.coe_pos.1 w_pos)).exists
filter_upwards [hx n, h'x, v.eventually_measure_lt_top x]
intro a ha μa_pos μa_lt_top
rw [ENNReal.div_lt_iff (Or.inl μa_pos.ne') (Or.inl μa_lt_top.ne)]
exact ha.trans_le (mul_le_mul_right' ((ENNReal.coe_le_coe.2 hn.le).trans w_lt.le) _)
section AbsolutelyContinuous
variable (hρ : ρ ≪ μ)
include hρ
/-- A set of points `s` satisfying both `ρ a ≤ c * μ a` and `ρ a ≥ d * μ a` at arbitrarily small
sets in a Vitali family has measure `0` if `c < d`. Indeed, the first inequality should imply
that `ρ s ≤ c * μ s`, and the second one that `ρ s ≥ d * μ s`, a contradiction if `0 < μ s`. -/
theorem null_of_frequently_le_of_frequently_ge {c d : ℝ≥0} (hcd : c < d) (s : Set α)
(hc : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, ρ a ≤ c * μ a)
(hd : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, (d : ℝ≥0∞) * μ a ≤ ρ a) : μ s = 0 := by
apply measure_null_of_locally_null s fun x _ => ?_
obtain ⟨o, xo, o_open, μo⟩ : ∃ o : Set α, x ∈ o ∧ IsOpen o ∧ μ o < ∞ :=
Measure.exists_isOpen_measure_lt_top μ x
refine ⟨s ∩ o, inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (o_open.mem_nhds xo), ?_⟩
let s' := s ∩ o
by_contra h
apply lt_irrefl (ρ s')
calc
ρ s' ≤ c * μ s' := v.measure_le_of_frequently_le (c • μ) hρ s' fun x hx => hc x hx.1
_ < d * μ s' := by
apply (ENNReal.mul_lt_mul_right h _).2 (ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.2 hcd)
exact (lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono inter_subset_right) μo).ne
_ ≤ ρ s' := v.measure_le_of_frequently_le ρ smul_absolutelyContinuous s' fun x hx ↦ hd x hx.1
/-- If `ρ` is absolutely continuous with respect to `μ`, then for almost every `x`,
the ratio `ρ a / μ a` converges as `a` shrinks to `x` along a Vitali family for `μ`. -/
theorem ae_tendsto_div : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∃ c, Tendsto (fun a => ρ a / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 c) := by
obtain ⟨w, w_count, w_dense, _, w_top⟩ :
∃ w : Set ℝ≥0∞, w.Countable ∧ Dense w ∧ 0 ∉ w ∧ ∞ ∉ w :=
ENNReal.exists_countable_dense_no_zero_top
have I : ∀ x ∈ w, x ≠ ∞ := fun x xs hx => w_top (hx ▸ xs)
have A : ∀ c ∈ w, ∀ d ∈ w, c < d → ∀ᵐ x ∂μ,
¬((∃ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, ρ a / μ a < c) ∧ ∃ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, d < ρ a / μ a) := by
intro c hc d hd hcd
lift c to ℝ≥0 using I c hc
lift d to ℝ≥0 using I d hd
apply v.null_of_frequently_le_of_frequently_ge hρ (ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.1 hcd)
· simp only [and_imp, exists_prop, not_frequently, not_and, not_lt, not_le, not_eventually,
mem_setOf_eq, mem_compl_iff, not_forall]
intro x h1x _
apply h1x.mono fun a ha => ?_
refine (ENNReal.div_le_iff_le_mul ?_ (Or.inr (bot_le.trans_lt ha).ne')).1 ha.le
simp only [ENNReal.coe_ne_top, Ne, or_true, not_false_iff]
· simp only [and_imp, exists_prop, not_frequently, not_and, not_lt, not_le, not_eventually,
mem_setOf_eq, mem_compl_iff, not_forall]
intro x _ h2x
apply h2x.mono fun a ha => ?_
exact ENNReal.mul_le_of_le_div ha.le
have B : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ c ∈ w, ∀ d ∈ w, c < d →
¬((∃ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, ρ a / μ a < c) ∧ ∃ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, d < ρ a / μ a) := by
#adaptation_note /-- 2024-04-23
The next two lines were previously just `simpa only [ae_ball_iff w_count, ae_all_iff]` -/
rw [ae_ball_iff w_count]; intro x hx; rw [ae_ball_iff w_count]; revert x
simpa only [ae_all_iff]
filter_upwards [B]
intro x hx
exact tendsto_of_no_upcrossings w_dense hx
theorem ae_tendsto_limRatio :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun a => ρ a / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 (v.limRatio ρ x)) := by
filter_upwards [v.ae_tendsto_div hρ]
intro x hx
exact tendsto_nhds_limUnder hx
/-- Given two thresholds `p < q`, the sets `{x | v.limRatio ρ x < p}`
and `{x | q < v.limRatio ρ x}` are obviously disjoint. The key to proving that `v.limRatio ρ` is
almost everywhere measurable is to show that these sets have measurable supersets which are also
disjoint, up to zero measure. This is the content of this lemma. -/
theorem exists_measurable_supersets_limRatio {p q : ℝ≥0} (hpq : p < q) :
∃ a b, MeasurableSet a ∧ MeasurableSet b ∧
{x | v.limRatio ρ x < p} ⊆ a ∧ {x | (q : ℝ≥0∞) < v.limRatio ρ x} ⊆ b ∧ μ (a ∩ b) = 0 := by
/- Here is a rough sketch, assuming that the measure is finite and the limit is well defined
everywhere. Let `u := {x | v.limRatio ρ x < p}` and `w := {x | q < v.limRatio ρ x}`. They
have measurable supersets `u'` and `w'` of the same measure. We will show that these satisfy
the conclusion of the theorem, i.e., `μ (u' ∩ w') = 0`. For this, note that
`ρ (u' ∩ w') = ρ (u ∩ w')` (as `w'` is measurable, see `measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left`).
The latter set is included in the set where the limit of the ratios is `< p`, and therefore
its measure is `≤ p * μ (u ∩ w')`. Using the same trick in the other direction gives that this
is `p * μ (u' ∩ w')`. We have shown that `ρ (u' ∩ w') ≤ p * μ (u' ∩ w')`. Arguing in the same
way but using the `w` part gives `q * μ (u' ∩ w') ≤ ρ (u' ∩ w')`. If `μ (u' ∩ w')` were nonzero,
this would be a contradiction as `p < q`.
For the rigorous proof, we need to work on a part of the space where the measure is finite
(provided by `spanningSets (ρ + μ)`) and to restrict to the set where the limit is well defined
(called `s` below, of full measure). Otherwise, the argument goes through.
-/
let s := {x | ∃ c, Tendsto (fun a => ρ a / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 c)}
let o : ℕ → Set α := spanningSets (ρ + μ)
let u n := s ∩ {x | v.limRatio ρ x < p} ∩ o n
let w n := s ∩ {x | (q : ℝ≥0∞) < v.limRatio ρ x} ∩ o n
-- the supersets are obtained by restricting to the set `s` where the limit is well defined, to
-- a finite measure part `o n`, taking a measurable superset here, and then taking the union over
-- `n`.
refine
⟨toMeasurable μ sᶜ ∪ ⋃ n, toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u n),
toMeasurable μ sᶜ ∪ ⋃ n, toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n), ?_, ?_, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
-- check that these sets are measurable supersets as required
· exact
(measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _).union
(MeasurableSet.iUnion fun n => measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _)
· exact
(measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _).union
(MeasurableSet.iUnion fun n => measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _)
· intro x hx
by_cases h : x ∈ s
· refine Or.inr (mem_iUnion.2 ⟨spanningSetsIndex (ρ + μ) x, ?_⟩)
exact subset_toMeasurable _ _ ⟨⟨h, hx⟩, mem_spanningSetsIndex _ _⟩
· exact Or.inl (subset_toMeasurable μ sᶜ h)
· intro x hx
by_cases h : x ∈ s
· refine Or.inr (mem_iUnion.2 ⟨spanningSetsIndex (ρ + μ) x, ?_⟩)
exact subset_toMeasurable _ _ ⟨⟨h, hx⟩, mem_spanningSetsIndex _ _⟩
· exact Or.inl (subset_toMeasurable μ sᶜ h)
-- it remains to check the nontrivial part that these sets have zero measure intersection.
-- it suffices to do it for fixed `m` and `n`, as one is taking countable unions.
suffices H : ∀ m n : ℕ, μ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) = 0 by
have A :
(toMeasurable μ sᶜ ∪ ⋃ n, toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u n)) ∩
(toMeasurable μ sᶜ ∪ ⋃ n, toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) ⊆
toMeasurable μ sᶜ ∪
⋃ (m) (n), toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n) := by
simp only [inter_union_distrib_left, union_inter_distrib_right, true_and,
subset_union_left, union_subset_iff, inter_self]
refine ⟨?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· exact inter_subset_right.trans subset_union_left
· exact inter_subset_left.trans subset_union_left
· simp_rw [iUnion_inter, inter_iUnion]; exact subset_union_right
refine le_antisymm ((measure_mono A).trans ?_) bot_le
calc
μ (toMeasurable μ sᶜ ∪
⋃ (m) (n), toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) ≤
μ (toMeasurable μ sᶜ) +
μ (⋃ (m) (n), toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) :=
measure_union_le _ _
_ = μ (⋃ (m) (n), toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) := by
have : μ sᶜ = 0 := v.ae_tendsto_div hρ; rw [measure_toMeasurable, this, zero_add]
_ ≤ ∑' (m) (n), μ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) :=
((measure_iUnion_le _).trans (ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun m => measure_iUnion_le _))
_ = 0 := by simp only [H, tsum_zero]
-- now starts the nontrivial part of the argument. We fix `m` and `n`, and show that the
-- measurable supersets of `u m` and `w n` have zero measure intersection by using the lemmas
-- `measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left` (to reduce to `u m` or `w n` instead of the measurable
-- superset) and `measure_le_of_frequently_le` to compare their measures for `ρ` and `μ`.
intro m n
have I : (ρ + μ) (u m) ≠ ∞ := by
apply (lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono _) (measure_spanningSets_lt_top (ρ + μ) m)).ne
exact inter_subset_right
have J : (ρ + μ) (w n) ≠ ∞ := by
apply (lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono _) (measure_spanningSets_lt_top (ρ + μ) n)).ne
exact inter_subset_right
have A :
ρ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) ≤
p * μ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) :=
calc
ρ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) =
ρ (u m ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) :=
measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _) I
_ ≤ (p • μ) (u m ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) := by
refine v.measure_le_of_frequently_le (p • μ) hρ _ fun x hx => ?_
have L : Tendsto (fun a : Set α => ρ a / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 (v.limRatio ρ x)) :=
tendsto_nhds_limUnder hx.1.1.1
have I : ∀ᶠ b : Set α in v.filterAt x, ρ b / μ b < p := (tendsto_order.1 L).2 _ hx.1.1.2
apply I.frequently.mono fun a ha => ?_
rw [coe_nnreal_smul_apply]
refine (ENNReal.div_le_iff_le_mul ?_ (Or.inr (bot_le.trans_lt ha).ne')).1 ha.le
simp only [ENNReal.coe_ne_top, Ne, or_true, not_false_iff]
_ = p * μ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) := by
simp only [coe_nnreal_smul_apply,
measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_right (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _) I]
have B :
(q : ℝ≥0∞) * μ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) ≤
ρ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) :=
calc
(q : ℝ≥0∞) * μ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) =
(q : ℝ≥0∞) * μ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ w n) := by
conv_rhs => rw [inter_comm]
rw [inter_comm, measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_right (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _) J]
_ ≤ ρ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ w n) := by
rw [← coe_nnreal_smul_apply]
refine v.measure_le_of_frequently_le _ (.smul_left .rfl _) _ ?_
intro x hx
have L : Tendsto (fun a : Set α => ρ a / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 (v.limRatio ρ x)) :=
tendsto_nhds_limUnder hx.2.1.1
have I : ∀ᶠ b : Set α in v.filterAt x, (q : ℝ≥0∞) < ρ b / μ b :=
(tendsto_order.1 L).1 _ hx.2.1.2
apply I.frequently.mono fun a ha => ?_
rw [coe_nnreal_smul_apply]
exact ENNReal.mul_le_of_le_div ha.le
_ = ρ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) := by
conv_rhs => rw [inter_comm]
rw [inter_comm]
exact (measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _) J).symm
by_contra h
apply lt_irrefl (ρ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)))
calc
ρ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) ≤
p * μ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) :=
A
_ < q * μ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) := by
gcongr
suffices H : (ρ + μ) (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) ≠ ∞ by
simp only [not_or, ENNReal.add_eq_top, Pi.add_apply, Ne, coe_add] at H
exact H.2
apply (lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono inter_subset_left) _).ne
rw [measure_toMeasurable]
apply lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono _) (measure_spanningSets_lt_top (ρ + μ) m)
exact inter_subset_right
_ ≤ ρ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) := B
theorem aemeasurable_limRatio : AEMeasurable (v.limRatio ρ) μ := by
apply ENNReal.aemeasurable_of_exist_almost_disjoint_supersets _ _ fun p q hpq => ?_
exact v.exists_measurable_supersets_limRatio hρ hpq
/-- A measurable version of `v.limRatio ρ`. Do *not* use this definition: it is only a temporary
device to show that `v.limRatio` is almost everywhere equal to the Radon-Nikodym derivative. -/
noncomputable def limRatioMeas : α → ℝ≥0∞ :=
(v.aemeasurable_limRatio hρ).mk _
theorem limRatioMeas_measurable : Measurable (v.limRatioMeas hρ) :=
AEMeasurable.measurable_mk _
theorem ae_tendsto_limRatioMeas :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun a => ρ a / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 (v.limRatioMeas hρ x)) := by
filter_upwards [v.ae_tendsto_limRatio hρ, AEMeasurable.ae_eq_mk (v.aemeasurable_limRatio hρ)]
intro x hx h'x
rwa [h'x] at hx
/-- If, for all `x` in a set `s`, one has frequently `ρ a / μ a < p`, then `ρ s ≤ p * μ s`, as
proved in `measure_le_of_frequently_le`. Since `ρ a / μ a` tends almost everywhere to
`v.limRatioMeas hρ x`, the same property holds for sets `s` on which `v.limRatioMeas hρ < p`. -/
theorem measure_le_mul_of_subset_limRatioMeas_lt {p : ℝ≥0} {s : Set α}
(h : s ⊆ {x | v.limRatioMeas hρ x < p}) : ρ s ≤ p * μ s := by
let t := {x : α | Tendsto (fun a => ρ a / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 (v.limRatioMeas hρ x))}
have A : μ tᶜ = 0 := v.ae_tendsto_limRatioMeas hρ
suffices H : ρ (s ∩ t) ≤ (p • μ) (s ∩ t) by calc
ρ s = ρ (s ∩ t ∪ s ∩ tᶜ) := by rw [inter_union_compl]
_ ≤ ρ (s ∩ t) + ρ (s ∩ tᶜ) := measure_union_le _ _
_ ≤ (p • μ) (s ∩ t) + ρ tᶜ := by gcongr; apply inter_subset_right
_ ≤ p * μ (s ∩ t) := by simp [(hρ A)]
_ ≤ p * μ s := by gcongr; apply inter_subset_left
refine v.measure_le_of_frequently_le (p • μ) hρ _ fun x hx => ?_
have I : ∀ᶠ b : Set α in v.filterAt x, ρ b / μ b < p := (tendsto_order.1 hx.2).2 _ (h hx.1)
apply I.frequently.mono fun a ha => ?_
rw [coe_nnreal_smul_apply]
refine (ENNReal.div_le_iff_le_mul ?_ (Or.inr (bot_le.trans_lt ha).ne')).1 ha.le
simp only [ENNReal.coe_ne_top, Ne, or_true, not_false_iff]
/-- If, for all `x` in a set `s`, one has frequently `q < ρ a / μ a`, then `q * μ s ≤ ρ s`, as
proved in `measure_le_of_frequently_le`. Since `ρ a / μ a` tends almost everywhere to
`v.limRatioMeas hρ x`, the same property holds for sets `s` on which `q < v.limRatioMeas hρ`. -/
theorem mul_measure_le_of_subset_lt_limRatioMeas {q : ℝ≥0} {s : Set α}
(h : s ⊆ {x | (q : ℝ≥0∞) < v.limRatioMeas hρ x}) : (q : ℝ≥0∞) * μ s ≤ ρ s := by
let t := {x : α | Tendsto (fun a => ρ a / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 (v.limRatioMeas hρ x))}
have A : μ tᶜ = 0 := v.ae_tendsto_limRatioMeas hρ
suffices H : (q • μ) (s ∩ t) ≤ ρ (s ∩ t) by calc
(q • μ) s = (q • μ) (s ∩ t ∪ s ∩ tᶜ) := by rw [inter_union_compl]
_ ≤ (q • μ) (s ∩ t) + (q • μ) (s ∩ tᶜ) := measure_union_le _ _
_ ≤ ρ (s ∩ t) + (q • μ) tᶜ := by gcongr; apply inter_subset_right
_ = ρ (s ∩ t) := by simp [A]
_ ≤ ρ s := by gcongr; apply inter_subset_left
refine v.measure_le_of_frequently_le _ (.smul_left .rfl _) _ ?_
intro x hx
have I : ∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, (q : ℝ≥0∞) < ρ a / μ a := (tendsto_order.1 hx.2).1 _ (h hx.1)
apply I.frequently.mono fun a ha => ?_
rw [coe_nnreal_smul_apply]
exact ENNReal.mul_le_of_le_div ha.le
/-- The points with `v.limRatioMeas hρ x = ∞` have measure `0` for `μ`. -/
theorem measure_limRatioMeas_top : μ {x | v.limRatioMeas hρ x = ∞} = 0 := by
refine measure_null_of_locally_null _ fun x _ => ?_
obtain ⟨o, xo, o_open, μo⟩ : ∃ o : Set α, x ∈ o ∧ IsOpen o ∧ ρ o < ∞ :=
Measure.exists_isOpen_measure_lt_top ρ x
let s := {x : α | v.limRatioMeas hρ x = ∞} ∩ o
refine ⟨s, inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (o_open.mem_nhds xo), le_antisymm ?_ bot_le⟩
have ρs : ρ s ≠ ∞ := ((measure_mono inter_subset_right).trans_lt μo).ne
have A : ∀ q : ℝ≥0, 1 ≤ q → μ s ≤ (q : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ * ρ s := by
intro q hq
rw [mul_comm, ← div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le _ (Or.inr ρs), mul_comm]
· apply v.mul_measure_le_of_subset_lt_limRatioMeas hρ
intro y hy
have : v.limRatioMeas hρ y = ∞ := hy.1
simp only [this, ENNReal.coe_lt_top, mem_setOf_eq]
· simp only [(zero_lt_one.trans_le hq).ne', true_or, ENNReal.coe_eq_zero, Ne,
not_false_iff]
have B : Tendsto (fun q : ℝ≥0 => (q : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ * ρ s) atTop (𝓝 (∞⁻¹ * ρ s)) := by
apply ENNReal.Tendsto.mul_const _ (Or.inr ρs)
exact ENNReal.tendsto_inv_iff.2 (ENNReal.tendsto_coe_nhds_top.2 tendsto_id)
simp only [zero_mul, ENNReal.inv_top] at B
apply ge_of_tendsto B
exact eventually_atTop.2 ⟨1, A⟩
/-- The points with `v.limRatioMeas hρ x = 0` have measure `0` for `ρ`. -/
theorem measure_limRatioMeas_zero : ρ {x | v.limRatioMeas hρ x = 0} = 0 := by
refine measure_null_of_locally_null _ fun x _ => ?_
obtain ⟨o, xo, o_open, μo⟩ : ∃ o : Set α, x ∈ o ∧ IsOpen o ∧ μ o < ∞ :=
Measure.exists_isOpen_measure_lt_top μ x
let s := {x : α | v.limRatioMeas hρ x = 0} ∩ o
refine ⟨s, inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (o_open.mem_nhds xo), le_antisymm ?_ bot_le⟩
have μs : μ s ≠ ∞ := ((measure_mono inter_subset_right).trans_lt μo).ne
have A : ∀ q : ℝ≥0, 0 < q → ρ s ≤ q * μ s := by
intro q hq
apply v.measure_le_mul_of_subset_limRatioMeas_lt hρ
intro y hy
have : v.limRatioMeas hρ y = 0 := hy.1
simp only [this, mem_setOf_eq, hq, ENNReal.coe_pos]
have B : Tendsto (fun q : ℝ≥0 => (q : ℝ≥0∞) * μ s) (𝓝[>] (0 : ℝ≥0)) (𝓝 ((0 : ℝ≥0) * μ s)) := by
apply ENNReal.Tendsto.mul_const _ (Or.inr μs)
rw [ENNReal.tendsto_coe]
exact nhdsWithin_le_nhds
simp only [zero_mul, ENNReal.coe_zero] at B
apply ge_of_tendsto B
filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin] using A
/-- As an intermediate step to show that `μ.withDensity (v.limRatioMeas hρ) = ρ`, we show here
that `μ.withDensity (v.limRatioMeas hρ) ≤ t^2 ρ` for any `t > 1`. -/
theorem withDensity_le_mul {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) {t : ℝ≥0} (ht : 1 < t) :
μ.withDensity (v.limRatioMeas hρ) s ≤ (t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ 2 * ρ s := by
/- We cut `s` into the sets where `v.limRatioMeas hρ = 0`, where `v.limRatioMeas hρ = ∞`, and
where `v.limRatioMeas hρ ∈ [t^n, t^(n+1))` for `n : ℤ`. The first and second have measure `0`.
For the latter, since `v.limRatioMeas hρ` fluctuates by at most `t` on this slice, we can use
`measure_le_mul_of_subset_limRatioMeas_lt` and `mul_measure_le_of_subset_lt_limRatioMeas` to
show that the two measures are comparable up to `t` (in fact `t^2` for technical reasons of
strict inequalities). -/
have t_ne_zero' : t ≠ 0 := (zero_lt_one.trans ht).ne'
have t_ne_zero : (t : ℝ≥0∞) ≠ 0 := by simpa only [ENNReal.coe_eq_zero, Ne] using t_ne_zero'
let ν := μ.withDensity (v.limRatioMeas hρ)
let f := v.limRatioMeas hρ
have f_meas : Measurable f := v.limRatioMeas_measurable hρ
-- Note(kmill): smul elaborator when used for CoeFun fails to get CoeFun instance to trigger
-- unless you use the `(... :)` notation. Another fix is using `(2 : Nat)`, so this appears
-- to be an unpleasant interaction with default instances.
have A : ν (s ∩ f ⁻¹' {0}) ≤ ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ 2 • ρ :) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' {0}) := by
apply le_trans _ (zero_le _)
have M : MeasurableSet (s ∩ f ⁻¹' {0}) := hs.inter (f_meas (measurableSet_singleton _))
simp only [f, ν, nonpos_iff_eq_zero, M, withDensity_apply, lintegral_eq_zero_iff f_meas]
apply (ae_restrict_iff' M).2
exact Eventually.of_forall fun x hx => hx.2
have B : ν (s ∩ f ⁻¹' {∞}) ≤ ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ 2 • ρ :) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' {∞}) := by
apply le_trans (le_of_eq _) (zero_le _)
apply withDensity_absolutelyContinuous μ _
rw [← nonpos_iff_eq_zero]
exact (measure_mono inter_subset_right).trans (v.measure_limRatioMeas_top hρ).le
have C :
∀ n : ℤ,
ν (s ∩ f ⁻¹' Ico ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ n) ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (n + 1))) ≤
((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ 2 • ρ :) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' Ico ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ n) ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (n + 1))) := by
intro n
let I := Ico ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ n) ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (n + 1))
have M : MeasurableSet (s ∩ f ⁻¹' I) := hs.inter (f_meas measurableSet_Ico)
simp only [ν, I, M, withDensity_apply, coe_nnreal_smul_apply]
calc
(∫⁻ x in s ∩ f ⁻¹' I, f x ∂μ) ≤ ∫⁻ _ in s ∩ f ⁻¹' I, (t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (n + 1) ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono_ae ((ae_restrict_iff' M).2 (Eventually.of_forall fun x hx => hx.2.2.le))
_ = (t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (n + 1) * μ (s ∩ f ⁻¹' I) := by
simp only [lintegral_const, MeasurableSet.univ, Measure.restrict_apply, univ_inter]
_ = (t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (2 : ℤ) * ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (n - 1) * μ (s ∩ f ⁻¹' I)) := by
rw [← mul_assoc, ← ENNReal.zpow_add t_ne_zero ENNReal.coe_ne_top]
congr 2
abel
_ ≤ (t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (2 : ℤ) * ρ (s ∩ f ⁻¹' I) := by
gcongr
rw [← ENNReal.coe_zpow (zero_lt_one.trans ht).ne']
apply v.mul_measure_le_of_subset_lt_limRatioMeas hρ
intro x hx
apply lt_of_lt_of_le _ hx.2.1
rw [← ENNReal.coe_zpow (zero_lt_one.trans ht).ne', ENNReal.coe_lt_coe, sub_eq_add_neg,
zpow_add₀ t_ne_zero']
conv_rhs => rw [← mul_one (t ^ n)]
gcongr
rw [zpow_neg_one]
exact inv_lt_one_of_one_lt₀ ht
calc
ν s =
ν (s ∩ f ⁻¹' {0}) + ν (s ∩ f ⁻¹' {∞}) +
∑' n : ℤ, ν (s ∩ f ⁻¹' Ico ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ n) ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (n + 1))) :=
measure_eq_measure_preimage_add_measure_tsum_Ico_zpow ν f_meas hs ht
_ ≤
((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ 2 • ρ :) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' {0}) + ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ 2 • ρ :) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' {∞}) +
∑' n : ℤ, ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ 2 • ρ :) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' Ico (t ^ n) (t ^ (n + 1))) :=
(add_le_add (add_le_add A B) (ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum C))
_ = ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ 2 • ρ :) s :=
(measure_eq_measure_preimage_add_measure_tsum_Ico_zpow ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ 2 • ρ) f_meas hs ht).symm
/-- As an intermediate step to show that `μ.withDensity (v.limRatioMeas hρ) = ρ`, we show here
that `ρ ≤ t μ.withDensity (v.limRatioMeas hρ)` for any `t > 1`. -/
theorem le_mul_withDensity {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) {t : ℝ≥0} (ht : 1 < t) :
ρ s ≤ t * μ.withDensity (v.limRatioMeas hρ) s := by
/- We cut `s` into the sets where `v.limRatioMeas hρ = 0`, where `v.limRatioMeas hρ = ∞`, and
where `v.limRatioMeas hρ ∈ [t^n, t^(n+1))` for `n : ℤ`. The first and second have measure `0`.
For the latter, since `v.limRatioMeas hρ` fluctuates by at most `t` on this slice, we can use
`measure_le_mul_of_subset_limRatioMeas_lt` and `mul_measure_le_of_subset_lt_limRatioMeas` to
show that the two measures are comparable up to `t`. -/
have t_ne_zero' : t ≠ 0 := (zero_lt_one.trans ht).ne'
have t_ne_zero : (t : ℝ≥0∞) ≠ 0 := by simpa only [ENNReal.coe_eq_zero, Ne] using t_ne_zero'
let ν := μ.withDensity (v.limRatioMeas hρ)
let f := v.limRatioMeas hρ
have f_meas : Measurable f := v.limRatioMeas_measurable hρ
have A : ρ (s ∩ f ⁻¹' {0}) ≤ (t • ν) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' {0}) := by
refine le_trans (measure_mono inter_subset_right) (le_trans (le_of_eq ?_) (zero_le _))
exact v.measure_limRatioMeas_zero hρ
have B : ρ (s ∩ f ⁻¹' {∞}) ≤ (t • ν) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' {∞}) := by
apply le_trans (le_of_eq _) (zero_le _)
apply hρ
rw [← nonpos_iff_eq_zero]
exact (measure_mono inter_subset_right).trans (v.measure_limRatioMeas_top hρ).le
have C :
∀ n : ℤ,
ρ (s ∩ f ⁻¹' Ico ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ n) ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (n + 1))) ≤
(t • ν) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' Ico ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ n) ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (n + 1))) := by
intro n
let I := Ico ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ n) ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (n + 1))
have M : MeasurableSet (s ∩ f ⁻¹' I) := hs.inter (f_meas measurableSet_Ico)
simp only [ν, I, M, withDensity_apply, coe_nnreal_smul_apply]
calc
ρ (s ∩ f ⁻¹' I) ≤ (t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (n + 1) * μ (s ∩ f ⁻¹' I) := by
rw [← ENNReal.coe_zpow t_ne_zero']
apply v.measure_le_mul_of_subset_limRatioMeas_lt hρ
intro x hx
apply hx.2.2.trans_le (le_of_eq _)
rw [ENNReal.coe_zpow t_ne_zero']
_ = ∫⁻ _ in s ∩ f ⁻¹' I, (t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (n + 1) ∂μ := by
simp only [lintegral_const, MeasurableSet.univ, Measure.restrict_apply, univ_inter]
_ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s ∩ f ⁻¹' I, t * f x ∂μ := by
apply lintegral_mono_ae ((ae_restrict_iff' M).2 (Eventually.of_forall fun x hx => ?_))
rw [add_comm, ENNReal.zpow_add t_ne_zero ENNReal.coe_ne_top, zpow_one]
exact mul_le_mul_left' hx.2.1 _
_ = t * ∫⁻ x in s ∩ f ⁻¹' I, f x ∂μ := lintegral_const_mul _ f_meas
calc
ρ s =
ρ (s ∩ f ⁻¹' {0}) + ρ (s ∩ f ⁻¹' {∞}) +
∑' n : ℤ, ρ (s ∩ f ⁻¹' Ico ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ n) ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (n + 1))) :=
measure_eq_measure_preimage_add_measure_tsum_Ico_zpow ρ f_meas hs ht
_ ≤
(t • ν) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' {0}) + (t • ν) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' {∞}) +
∑' n : ℤ, (t • ν) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' Ico ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ n) ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (n + 1))) :=
(add_le_add (add_le_add A B) (ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum C))
_ = (t • ν) s :=
(measure_eq_measure_preimage_add_measure_tsum_Ico_zpow (t • ν) f_meas hs ht).symm
theorem withDensity_limRatioMeas_eq : μ.withDensity (v.limRatioMeas hρ) = ρ := by
ext1 s hs
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· have : Tendsto (fun t : ℝ≥0 =>
((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ 2 * ρ s : ℝ≥0∞)) (𝓝[>] 1) (𝓝 ((1 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ 2 * ρ s)) := by
refine ENNReal.Tendsto.mul ?_ ?_ tendsto_const_nhds ?_
· exact ENNReal.Tendsto.pow (ENNReal.tendsto_coe.2 nhdsWithin_le_nhds)
· simp only [one_pow, ENNReal.coe_one, true_or, Ne, not_false_iff, one_ne_zero]
· simp only [one_pow, ENNReal.coe_one, Ne, or_true, ENNReal.one_ne_top, not_false_iff]
simp only [one_pow, one_mul, ENNReal.coe_one] at this
refine ge_of_tendsto this ?_
filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin] with _ ht
exact v.withDensity_le_mul hρ hs ht
· have :
Tendsto (fun t : ℝ≥0 => (t : ℝ≥0∞) * μ.withDensity (v.limRatioMeas hρ) s) (𝓝[>] 1)
(𝓝 ((1 : ℝ≥0∞) * μ.withDensity (v.limRatioMeas hρ) s)) := by
refine ENNReal.Tendsto.mul_const (ENNReal.tendsto_coe.2 nhdsWithin_le_nhds) ?_
simp only [ENNReal.coe_one, true_or, Ne, not_false_iff, one_ne_zero]
simp only [one_mul, ENNReal.coe_one] at this
refine ge_of_tendsto this ?_
filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin] with _ ht
exact v.le_mul_withDensity hρ hs ht
/-- Weak version of the main theorem on differentiation of measures: given a Vitali family `v`
for a locally finite measure `μ`, and another locally finite measure `ρ`, then for `μ`-almost
every `x` the ratio `ρ a / μ a` converges, when `a` shrinks to `x` along the Vitali family,
towards the Radon-Nikodym derivative of `ρ` with respect to `μ`.
This version assumes that `ρ` is absolutely continuous with respect to `μ`. The general version
without this superfluous assumption is `VitaliFamily.ae_tendsto_rnDeriv`.
-/
theorem ae_tendsto_rnDeriv_of_absolutelyContinuous :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun a => ρ a / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 (ρ.rnDeriv μ x)) := by
have A : (μ.withDensity (v.limRatioMeas hρ)).rnDeriv μ =ᵐ[μ] v.limRatioMeas hρ :=
rnDeriv_withDensity μ (v.limRatioMeas_measurable hρ)
rw [v.withDensity_limRatioMeas_eq hρ] at A
filter_upwards [v.ae_tendsto_limRatioMeas hρ, A] with _ _ h'x
rwa [h'x]
end AbsolutelyContinuous
variable (ρ)
/-- Main theorem on differentiation of measures: given a Vitali family `v` for a locally finite
measure `μ`, and another locally finite measure `ρ`, then for `μ`-almost every `x` the
ratio `ρ a / μ a` converges, when `a` shrinks to `x` along the Vitali family, towards the
Radon-Nikodym derivative of `ρ` with respect to `μ`. -/
theorem ae_tendsto_rnDeriv :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun a => ρ a / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 (ρ.rnDeriv μ x)) := by
let t := μ.withDensity (ρ.rnDeriv μ)
have eq_add : ρ = ρ.singularPart μ + t := haveLebesgueDecomposition_add _ _
have A : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun a => ρ.singularPart μ a / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 0) :=
v.ae_eventually_measure_zero_of_singular (mutuallySingular_singularPart ρ μ)
have B : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, t.rnDeriv μ x = ρ.rnDeriv μ x :=
rnDeriv_withDensity μ (measurable_rnDeriv ρ μ)
have C : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun a => t a / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 (t.rnDeriv μ x)) :=
v.ae_tendsto_rnDeriv_of_absolutelyContinuous (withDensity_absolutelyContinuous _ _)
filter_upwards [A, B, C] with _ Ax Bx Cx
convert Ax.add Cx using 1
· ext1 a
conv_lhs => rw [eq_add]
simp only [Pi.add_apply, coe_add, ENNReal.add_div]
· simp only [Bx, zero_add]
/-! ### Lebesgue density points -/
|
/-- Given a measurable set `s`, then `μ (s ∩ a) / μ a` converges when `a` shrinks to a typical
point `x` along a Vitali family. The limit is `1` for `x ∈ s` and `0` for `x ∉ s`. This shows that
almost every point of `s` is a Lebesgue density point for `s`. A version for non-measurable sets
holds, but it only gives the first conclusion, see `ae_tendsto_measure_inter_div`. -/
theorem ae_tendsto_measure_inter_div_of_measurableSet {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun a => μ (s ∩ a) / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 (s.indicator 1 x)) := by
haveI : IsLocallyFiniteMeasure (μ.restrict s) :=
isLocallyFiniteMeasure_of_le restrict_le_self
filter_upwards [ae_tendsto_rnDeriv v (μ.restrict s), rnDeriv_restrict_self μ hs]
intro x hx h'x
simpa only [h'x, restrict_apply' hs, inter_comm] using hx
/-- Given an arbitrary set `s`, then `μ (s ∩ a) / μ a` converges to `1` when `a` shrinks to a
typical point of `s` along a Vitali family. This shows that almost every point of `s` is a
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Covering/Differentiation.lean | 708 | 723 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Multiset.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.List
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Abs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.OrderDual
import Mathlib.Data.List.MinMax
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Fold
/-!
# Big operators on a multiset in ordered groups
This file contains the results concerning the interaction of multiset big operators with ordered
groups.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
variable {ι α β : Type*}
namespace Multiset
section OrderedCommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedMonoid α] {s t : Multiset α} {a : α}
@[to_additive sum_nonneg]
lemma one_le_prod_of_one_le : (∀ x ∈ s, (1 : α) ≤ x) → 1 ≤ s.prod :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l hl => by simpa using List.one_le_prod_of_one_le hl
@[to_additive]
lemma single_le_prod : (∀ x ∈ s, (1 : α) ≤ x) → ∀ x ∈ s, x ≤ s.prod :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l hl x hx => by simpa using List.single_le_prod hl x hx
@[to_additive sum_le_card_nsmul]
lemma prod_le_pow_card (s : Multiset α) (n : α) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, x ≤ n) : s.prod ≤ n ^ card s := by
induction s using Quotient.inductionOn
simpa using List.prod_le_pow_card _ _ h
@[to_additive all_zero_of_le_zero_le_of_sum_eq_zero]
lemma all_one_of_le_one_le_of_prod_eq_one :
(∀ x ∈ s, (1 : α) ≤ x) → s.prod = 1 → ∀ x ∈ s, x = (1 : α) :=
Quotient.inductionOn s (by
simp only [quot_mk_to_coe, prod_coe, mem_coe]
exact fun l => List.all_one_of_le_one_le_of_prod_eq_one)
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_le_prod_of_rel_le (h : s.Rel (· ≤ ·) t) : s.prod ≤ t.prod := by
induction h with
| zero => rfl
| cons rh _ rt =>
rw [prod_cons, prod_cons]
exact mul_le_mul' rh rt
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_map_le_prod_map {s : Multiset ι} (f : ι → α) (g : ι → α) (h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → f i ≤ g i) :
(s.map f).prod ≤ (s.map g).prod :=
prod_le_prod_of_rel_le <| rel_map.2 <| rel_refl_of_refl_on h
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_map_le_prod (f : α → α) (h : ∀ x, x ∈ s → f x ≤ x) : (s.map f).prod ≤ s.prod :=
prod_le_prod_of_rel_le <| rel_map_left.2 <| rel_refl_of_refl_on h
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_le_prod_map (f : α → α) (h : ∀ x, x ∈ s → x ≤ f x) : s.prod ≤ (s.map f).prod :=
prod_map_le_prod (α := αᵒᵈ) f h
@[to_additive card_nsmul_le_sum]
lemma pow_card_le_prod (h : ∀ x ∈ s, a ≤ x) : a ^ card s ≤ s.prod := by
rw [← Multiset.prod_replicate, ← Multiset.map_const]
exact prod_map_le_prod _ h
end OrderedCommMonoid
section
variable [CommMonoid α] [CommMonoid β] [PartialOrder β] [IsOrderedMonoid β]
@[to_additive le_sum_of_subadditive_on_pred]
lemma le_prod_of_submultiplicative_on_pred (f : α → β)
(p : α → Prop) (h_one : f 1 = 1) (hp_one : p 1)
(h_mul : ∀ a b, p a → p b → f (a * b) ≤ f a * f b) (hp_mul : ∀ a b, p a → p b → p (a * b))
(s : Multiset α) (hps : ∀ a, a ∈ s → p a) : f s.prod ≤ (s.map f).prod := by
revert s
refine Multiset.induction ?_ ?_
· simp [le_of_eq h_one]
intro a s hs hpsa
have hps : ∀ x, x ∈ s → p x := fun x hx => hpsa x (mem_cons_of_mem hx)
have hp_prod : p s.prod := prod_induction p s hp_mul hp_one hps
rw [prod_cons, map_cons, prod_cons]
exact (h_mul a s.prod (hpsa a (mem_cons_self a s)) hp_prod).trans (mul_le_mul_left' (hs hps) _)
@[to_additive le_sum_of_subadditive]
lemma le_prod_of_submultiplicative (f : α → β) (h_one : f 1 = 1)
(h_mul : ∀ a b, f (a * b) ≤ f a * f b) (s : Multiset α) : f s.prod ≤ (s.map f).prod :=
le_prod_of_submultiplicative_on_pred f (fun _ => True) h_one trivial (fun x y _ _ => h_mul x y)
(by simp) s (by simp)
@[to_additive le_sum_nonempty_of_subadditive_on_pred]
lemma le_prod_nonempty_of_submultiplicative_on_pred (f : α → β) (p : α → Prop)
(h_mul : ∀ a b, p a → p b → f (a * b) ≤ f a * f b) (hp_mul : ∀ a b, p a → p b → p (a * b))
(s : Multiset α) (hs_nonempty : s ≠ ∅) (hs : ∀ a, a ∈ s → p a) : f s.prod ≤ (s.map f).prod := by
revert s
refine Multiset.induction ?_ ?_
· simp
rintro a s hs - hsa_prop
rw [prod_cons, map_cons, prod_cons]
by_cases hs_empty : s = ∅
· simp [hs_empty]
have hsa_restrict : ∀ x, x ∈ s → p x := fun x hx => hsa_prop x (mem_cons_of_mem hx)
have hp_sup : p s.prod := prod_induction_nonempty p hp_mul hs_empty hsa_restrict
have hp_a : p a := hsa_prop a (mem_cons_self a s)
exact (h_mul a _ hp_a hp_sup).trans (mul_le_mul_left' (hs hs_empty hsa_restrict) _)
@[to_additive le_sum_nonempty_of_subadditive]
lemma le_prod_nonempty_of_submultiplicative (f : α → β) (h_mul : ∀ a b, f (a * b) ≤ f a * f b)
(s : Multiset α) (hs_nonempty : s ≠ ∅) : f s.prod ≤ (s.map f).prod :=
le_prod_nonempty_of_submultiplicative_on_pred f (fun _ => True) (by simp [h_mul]) (by simp) s
hs_nonempty (by simp)
end
section OrderedCancelCommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedCancelMonoid α] {s : Multiset ι} {f g : ι → α}
@[to_additive sum_lt_sum]
lemma prod_lt_prod' (hle : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ≤ g i) (hlt : ∃ i ∈ s, f i < g i) :
(s.map f).prod < (s.map g).prod := by
obtain ⟨l⟩ := s
simp only [Multiset.quot_mk_to_coe'', Multiset.map_coe, Multiset.prod_coe]
exact List.prod_lt_prod' f g hle hlt
@[to_additive sum_lt_sum_of_nonempty]
lemma prod_lt_prod_of_nonempty' (hs : s ≠ ∅) (hfg : ∀ i ∈ s, f i < g i) :
(s.map f).prod < (s.map g).prod := by
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := exists_mem_of_ne_zero hs
exact prod_lt_prod' (fun i hi => le_of_lt (hfg i hi)) ⟨i, hi, hfg i hi⟩
end OrderedCancelCommMonoid
section CanonicallyOrderedMul
variable [CommMonoid α] [PartialOrder α] [CanonicallyOrderedMul α] {m : Multiset α} {a : α}
@[to_additive] lemma prod_eq_one_iff [IsOrderedMonoid α] : m.prod = 1 ↔ ∀ x ∈ m, x = (1 : α) :=
Quotient.inductionOn m fun l ↦ by simpa using List.prod_eq_one_iff
@[to_additive] lemma le_prod_of_mem (ha : a ∈ m) : a ≤ m.prod := by
obtain ⟨t, rfl⟩ := exists_cons_of_mem ha
rw [prod_cons]
| exact _root_.le_mul_right (le_refl a)
end CanonicallyOrderedMul
lemma max_le_of_forall_le {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] [OrderBot α] (l : Multiset α)
(n : α) (h : ∀ x ∈ l, x ≤ n) : l.fold max ⊥ ≤ n := by
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/BigOperators/Group/Multiset.lean | 150 | 155 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.CharZero
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Units
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Coprod.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Complement
/-!
## HNN Extensions of Groups
This file defines the HNN extension of a group `G`, `HNNExtension G A B φ`. Given a group `G`,
subgroups `A` and `B` and an isomorphism `φ` of `A` and `B`, we adjoin a letter `t` to `G`, such
that for any `a ∈ A`, the conjugate of `of a` by `t` is `of (φ a)`, where `of` is the canonical map
from `G` into the `HNNExtension`. This construction is named after Graham Higman, Bernhard Neumann
and Hanna Neumann.
## Main definitions
- `HNNExtension G A B φ` : The HNN Extension of a group `G`, where `A` and `B` are subgroups and `φ`
is an isomorphism between `A` and `B`.
- `HNNExtension.of` : The canonical embedding of `G` into `HNNExtension G A B φ`.
- `HNNExtension.t` : The stable letter of the HNN extension.
- `HNNExtension.lift` : Define a function `HNNExtension G A B φ →* H`, by defining it on `G` and `t`
- `HNNExtension.of_injective` : The canonical embedding `G →* HNNExtension G A B φ` is injective.
- `HNNExtension.ReducedWord.toList_eq_nil_of_mem_of_range` : Britton's Lemma. If an element of
`G` is represented by a reduced word, then this reduced word does not contain `t`.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Monoid Coprod Multiplicative Subgroup Function
/-- The relation we quotient the coproduct by to form an `HNNExtension`. -/
def HNNExtension.con (G : Type*) [Group G] (A B : Subgroup G) (φ : A ≃* B) :
Con (G ∗ Multiplicative ℤ) :=
conGen (fun x y => ∃ (a : A),
x = inr (ofAdd 1) * inl (a : G) ∧
y = inl (φ a : G) * inr (ofAdd 1))
/-- The HNN Extension of a group `G`, `HNNExtension G A B φ`. Given a group `G`, subgroups `A` and
`B` and an isomorphism `φ` of `A` and `B`, we adjoin a letter `t` to `G`, such that for
any `a ∈ A`, the conjugate of `of a` by `t` is `of (φ a)`, where `of` is the canonical
map from `G` into the `HNNExtension`. -/
def HNNExtension (G : Type*) [Group G] (A B : Subgroup G) (φ : A ≃* B) : Type _ :=
(HNNExtension.con G A B φ).Quotient
variable {G : Type*} [Group G] {A B : Subgroup G} {φ : A ≃* B} {H : Type*}
[Group H] {M : Type*} [Monoid M]
instance : Group (HNNExtension G A B φ) := by
delta HNNExtension; infer_instance
namespace HNNExtension
/-- The canonical embedding `G →* HNNExtension G A B φ` -/
def of : G →* HNNExtension G A B φ :=
(HNNExtension.con G A B φ).mk'.comp inl
/-- The stable letter of the `HNNExtension` -/
def t : HNNExtension G A B φ :=
(HNNExtension.con G A B φ).mk'.comp inr (ofAdd 1)
theorem t_mul_of (a : A) :
t * (of (a : G) : HNNExtension G A B φ) = of (φ a : G) * t :=
(Con.eq _).2 <| ConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| ⟨a, by simp⟩
theorem of_mul_t (b : B) :
(of (b : G) : HNNExtension G A B φ) * t = t * of (φ.symm b : G) := by
rw [t_mul_of]; simp
theorem equiv_eq_conj (a : A) :
(of (φ a : G) : HNNExtension G A B φ) = t * of (a : G) * t⁻¹ := by
rw [t_mul_of]; simp
theorem equiv_symm_eq_conj (b : B) :
(of (φ.symm b : G) : HNNExtension G A B φ) = t⁻¹ * of (b : G) * t := by
rw [mul_assoc, of_mul_t]; simp
theorem inv_t_mul_of (b : B) :
t⁻¹ * (of (b : G) : HNNExtension G A B φ) = of (φ.symm b : G) * t⁻¹ := by
rw [equiv_symm_eq_conj]; simp
theorem of_mul_inv_t (a : A) :
(of (a : G) : HNNExtension G A B φ) * t⁻¹ = t⁻¹ * of (φ a : G) := by
rw [equiv_eq_conj]; simp [mul_assoc]
/-- Define a function `HNNExtension G A B φ →* H`, by defining it on `G` and `t` -/
def lift (f : G →* H) (x : H) (hx : ∀ a : A, x * f ↑a = f (φ a : G) * x) :
HNNExtension G A B φ →* H :=
Con.lift _ (Coprod.lift f (zpowersHom H x)) (Con.conGen_le <| by
rintro _ _ ⟨a, rfl, rfl⟩
simp [hx])
@[simp]
theorem lift_t (f : G →* H) (x : H) (hx : ∀ a : A, x * f ↑a = f (φ a : G) * x) :
lift f x hx t = x := by
delta HNNExtension; simp [lift, t]
@[simp]
theorem lift_of (f : G →* H) (x : H) (hx : ∀ a : A, x * f ↑a = f (φ a : G) * x) (g : G) :
lift f x hx (of g) = f g := by
delta HNNExtension; simp [lift, of]
@[ext high]
theorem hom_ext {f g : HNNExtension G A B φ →* M}
(hg : f.comp of = g.comp of) (ht : f t = g t) : f = g :=
(MonoidHom.cancel_right Con.mk'_surjective).mp <|
Coprod.hom_ext hg (MonoidHom.ext_mint ht)
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on {motive : HNNExtension G A B φ → Prop}
(x : HNNExtension G A B φ) (of : ∀ g, motive (of g))
(t : motive t) (mul : ∀ x y, motive x → motive y → motive (x * y))
(inv : ∀ x, motive x → motive x⁻¹) : motive x := by
let S : Subgroup (HNNExtension G A B φ) :=
{ carrier := setOf motive
one_mem' := by simpa using of 1
mul_mem' := mul _ _
inv_mem' := inv _ }
let f : HNNExtension G A B φ →* S :=
lift (HNNExtension.of.codRestrict S of)
⟨HNNExtension.t, t⟩ (by intro a; ext; simp [equiv_eq_conj, mul_assoc])
have hf : S.subtype.comp f = MonoidHom.id _ :=
hom_ext (by ext; simp [f]) (by simp [f])
show motive (MonoidHom.id _ x)
rw [← hf]
exact (f x).2
variable (A B φ)
/-- To avoid duplicating code, we define `toSubgroup A B u` and `toSubgroupEquiv u`
where `u : ℤˣ` is `1` or `-1`. `toSubgroup A B u` is `A` when `u = 1` and `B` when `u = -1`,
and `toSubgroupEquiv` is `φ` when `u = 1` and `φ⁻¹` when `u = -1`. `toSubgroup u` is the subgroup
such that for any `a ∈ toSubgroup u`, `t ^ (u : ℤ) * a = toSubgroupEquiv a * t ^ (u : ℤ)`. -/
def toSubgroup (u : ℤˣ) : Subgroup G :=
if u = 1 then A else B
@[simp]
theorem toSubgroup_one : toSubgroup A B 1 = A := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toSubgroup_neg_one : toSubgroup A B (-1) = B := rfl
variable {A B}
/-- To avoid duplicating code, we define `toSubgroup A B u` and `toSubgroupEquiv u`
where `u : ℤˣ` is `1` or `-1`. `toSubgroup A B u` is `A` when `u = 1` and `B` when `u = -1`,
and `toSubgroupEquiv` is the group ismorphism from `toSubgroup A B u` to `toSubgroup A B (-u)`.
It is defined to be `φ` when `u = 1` and `φ⁻¹` when `u = -1`. -/
def toSubgroupEquiv (u : ℤˣ) : toSubgroup A B u ≃* toSubgroup A B (-u) :=
if hu : u = 1 then hu ▸ φ else by
convert φ.symm <;>
cases Int.units_eq_one_or u <;> simp_all
@[simp]
theorem toSubgroupEquiv_one : toSubgroupEquiv φ 1 = φ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toSubgroupEquiv_neg_one : toSubgroupEquiv φ (-1) = φ.symm := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toSubgroupEquiv_neg_apply (u : ℤˣ) (a : toSubgroup A B u) :
(toSubgroupEquiv φ (-u) (toSubgroupEquiv φ u a) : G) = a := by
rcases Int.units_eq_one_or u with rfl | rfl
· simp [toSubgroup]
· simp only [toSubgroup_neg_one, toSubgroupEquiv_neg_one, SetLike.coe_eq_coe]
exact φ.apply_symm_apply a
namespace NormalWord
variable (G A B)
/-- To put word in the HNN Extension into a normal form, we must choose an element of each right
coset of both `A` and `B`, such that the chosen element of the subgroup itself is `1`. -/
structure TransversalPair : Type _ where
/-- The transversal of each subgroup -/
set : ℤˣ → Set G
/-- We have exactly one element of each coset of the subgroup -/
compl : ∀ u, IsComplement (toSubgroup A B u : Subgroup G) (set u)
instance TransversalPair.nonempty : Nonempty (TransversalPair G A B) := by
choose t ht using fun u ↦ (toSubgroup A B u).exists_isComplement_right 1
exact ⟨⟨t, fun i ↦ (ht i).1⟩⟩
/-- A reduced word is a `head`, which is an element of `G`, followed by the product list of pairs.
There should also be no sequences of the form `t^u * g * t^-u`, where `g` is in
`toSubgroup A B u` This is a less strict condition than required for `NormalWord`. -/
structure ReducedWord : Type _ where
/-- Every `ReducedWord` is the product of an element of the group and a word made up
of letters each of which is in the transversal. `head` is that element of the base group. -/
head : G
/-- The list of pairs `(ℤˣ × G)`, where each pair `(u, g)` represents the element `t^u * g` of
`HNNExtension G A B φ` -/
toList : List (ℤˣ × G)
/-- There are no sequences of the form `t^u * g * t^-u` where `g ∈ toSubgroup A B u` -/
chain : toList.Chain' (fun a b => a.2 ∈ toSubgroup A B a.1 → a.1 = b.1)
/-- The empty reduced word. -/
@[simps]
def ReducedWord.empty : ReducedWord G A B :=
{ head := 1
toList := []
chain := List.chain'_nil }
variable {G A B}
/-- The product of a `ReducedWord` as an element of the `HNNExtension` -/
def ReducedWord.prod : ReducedWord G A B → HNNExtension G A B φ :=
fun w => of w.head * (w.toList.map (fun x => t ^ (x.1 : ℤ) * of x.2)).prod
/-- Given a `TransversalPair`, we can make a normal form for words in the `HNNExtension G A B φ`.
The normal form is a `head`, which is an element of `G`, followed by the product list of pairs,
`t ^ u * g`, where `u` is `1` or `-1` and `g` is the chosen element of its right coset of
`toSubgroup A B u`. There should also be no sequences of the form `t^u * g * t^-u`
where `g ∈ toSubgroup A B u` -/
structure _root_.HNNExtension.NormalWord (d : TransversalPair G A B) : Type _
extends ReducedWord G A B where
/-- Every element `g : G` in the list is the chosen element of its coset -/
mem_set : ∀ (u : ℤˣ) (g : G), (u, g) ∈ toList → g ∈ d.set u
variable {d : TransversalPair G A B}
@[ext]
theorem ext {w w' : NormalWord d}
(h1 : w.head = w'.head) (h2 : w.toList = w'.toList) : w = w' := by
rcases w with ⟨⟨⟩, _⟩; cases w'; simp_all
/-- The empty word -/
@[simps]
def empty : NormalWord d :=
{ head := 1
toList := []
mem_set := by simp
chain := List.chain'_nil }
/-- The `NormalWord` representing an element `g` of the group `G`, which is just the element `g`
itself. -/
@[simps]
def ofGroup (g : G) : NormalWord d :=
{ head := g
toList := []
mem_set := by simp
chain := List.chain'_nil }
instance : Inhabited (NormalWord d) := ⟨empty⟩
instance : MulAction G (NormalWord d) :=
{ smul := fun g w => { w with head := g * w.head }
one_smul := by simp [instHSMul]
mul_smul := by simp [instHSMul, mul_assoc] }
theorem group_smul_def (g : G) (w : NormalWord d) :
g • w = { w with head := g * w.head } := rfl
@[simp]
theorem group_smul_head (g : G) (w : NormalWord d) : (g • w).head = g * w.head := rfl
@[simp]
theorem group_smul_toList (g : G) (w : NormalWord d) : (g • w).toList = w.toList := rfl
instance : FaithfulSMul G (NormalWord d) := ⟨by simp [group_smul_def]⟩
/-- A constructor to append an element `g` of `G` and `u : ℤˣ` to a word `w` with sufficient
hypotheses that no normalization or cancellation need take place for the result to be in normal form
-/
@[simps]
def cons (g : G) (u : ℤˣ) (w : NormalWord d) (h1 : w.head ∈ d.set u)
(h2 : ∀ u' ∈ Option.map Prod.fst w.toList.head?, w.head ∈ toSubgroup A B u → u = u') :
NormalWord d :=
{ head := g,
toList := (u, w.head) :: w.toList,
mem_set := by
intro u' g' h'
simp only [List.mem_cons, Prod.mk.injEq] at h'
rcases h' with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | h'
· exact h1
· exact w.mem_set _ _ h'
chain := by
refine List.chain'_cons'.2 ⟨?_, w.chain⟩
rintro ⟨u', g'⟩ hu' hw1
exact h2 _ (by simp_all) hw1 }
/-- A recursor to induct on a `NormalWord`, by proving the property is preserved under `cons` -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def consRecOn {motive : NormalWord d → Sort*} (w : NormalWord d)
(ofGroup : ∀ g, motive (ofGroup g))
(cons : ∀ (g : G) (u : ℤˣ) (w : NormalWord d) (h1 : w.head ∈ d.set u)
(h2 : ∀ u' ∈ Option.map Prod.fst w.toList.head?,
w.head ∈ toSubgroup A B u → u = u'),
motive w → motive (cons g u w h1 h2)) : motive w := by
rcases w with ⟨⟨g, l, chain⟩, mem_set⟩
induction l generalizing g with
| nil => exact ofGroup _
| cons a l ih =>
exact cons g a.1
{ head := a.2
toList := l
mem_set := fun _ _ h => mem_set _ _ (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ h),
chain := (List.chain'_cons'.1 chain).2 }
(mem_set a.1 a.2 List.mem_cons_self)
(by simpa using (List.chain'_cons'.1 chain).1)
(ih _ _ _)
@[simp]
theorem consRecOn_ofGroup {motive : NormalWord d → Sort*}
(g : G) (ofGroup : ∀ g, motive (ofGroup g))
(cons : ∀ (g : G) (u : ℤˣ) (w : NormalWord d) (h1 : w.head ∈ d.set u)
(h2 : ∀ u' ∈ Option.map Prod.fst w.toList.head?, w.head
∈ toSubgroup A B u → u = u'),
motive w → motive (cons g u w h1 h2)) :
consRecOn (.ofGroup g) ofGroup cons = ofGroup g := rfl
@[simp]
theorem consRecOn_cons {motive : NormalWord d → Sort*}
(g : G) (u : ℤˣ) (w : NormalWord d) (h1 : w.head ∈ d.set u)
(h2 : ∀ u' ∈ Option.map Prod.fst w.toList.head?, w.head ∈ toSubgroup A B u → u = u')
(ofGroup : ∀ g, motive (ofGroup g))
(cons : ∀ (g : G) (u : ℤˣ) (w : NormalWord d) (h1 : w.head ∈ d.set u)
(h2 : ∀ u' ∈ Option.map Prod.fst w.toList.head?,
w.head ∈ toSubgroup A B u → u = u'),
motive w → motive (cons g u w h1 h2)) :
consRecOn (.cons g u w h1 h2) ofGroup cons = cons g u w h1 h2
(consRecOn w ofGroup cons) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem smul_cons (g₁ g₂ : G) (u : ℤˣ) (w : NormalWord d) (h1 : w.head ∈ d.set u)
(h2 : ∀ u' ∈ Option.map Prod.fst w.toList.head?, w.head ∈ toSubgroup A B u → u = u') :
g₁ • cons g₂ u w h1 h2 = cons (g₁ * g₂) u w h1 h2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem smul_ofGroup (g₁ g₂ : G) :
g₁ • (ofGroup g₂ : NormalWord d) = ofGroup (g₁ * g₂) := rfl
variable (d)
/-- The action of `t^u` on `ofGroup g`. The normal form will be
`a * t^u * g'` where `a ∈ toSubgroup A B (-u)` -/
noncomputable def unitsSMulGroup (u : ℤˣ) (g : G) :
(toSubgroup A B (-u)) × d.set u :=
let g' := (d.compl u).equiv g
(toSubgroupEquiv φ u g'.1, g'.2)
theorem unitsSMulGroup_snd (u : ℤˣ) (g : G) :
(unitsSMulGroup φ d u g).2 = ((d.compl u).equiv g).2 := by
rcases Int.units_eq_one_or u with rfl | rfl <;> rfl
variable {d}
/-- `Cancels u w` is a predicate expressing whether `t^u` cancels with some occurrence
of `t^-u` when we multiply `t^u` by `w`. -/
def Cancels (u : ℤˣ) (w : NormalWord d) : Prop :=
(w.head ∈ (toSubgroup A B u : Subgroup G)) ∧ w.toList.head?.map Prod.fst = some (-u)
/-- Multiplying `t^u` by `w` in the special case where cancellation happens -/
def unitsSMulWithCancel (u : ℤˣ) (w : NormalWord d) : Cancels u w → NormalWord d :=
consRecOn w
(by simp [Cancels, ofGroup]; tauto)
(fun g _ w _ _ _ can =>
(toSubgroupEquiv φ u ⟨g, can.1⟩ : G) • w)
/-- Multiplying `t^u` by a `NormalWord`, `w` and putting the result in normal form. -/
noncomputable def unitsSMul (u : ℤˣ) (w : NormalWord d) : NormalWord d :=
letI := Classical.dec
if h : Cancels u w
then unitsSMulWithCancel φ u w h
else let g' := unitsSMulGroup φ d u w.head
cons g'.1 u ((g'.2 * w.head⁻¹ : G) • w)
(by simp)
(by
simp only [g', group_smul_toList, Option.mem_def, Option.map_eq_some_iff, Prod.exists,
exists_and_right, exists_eq_right, group_smul_head, inv_mul_cancel_right,
forall_exists_index, unitsSMulGroup]
simp only [Cancels, Option.map_eq_some_iff, Prod.exists, exists_and_right, exists_eq_right,
not_and, not_exists] at h
intro u' x hx hmem
have : w.head ∈ toSubgroup A B u := by
have := (d.compl u).rightCosetEquivalence_equiv_snd w.head
rw [RightCosetEquivalence, rightCoset_eq_iff, mul_mem_cancel_left hmem] at this
simp_all
have := h this x
simp_all [Int.units_ne_iff_eq_neg])
/-- A condition for not cancelling whose hypothese are the same as those of the `cons` function. -/
theorem not_cancels_of_cons_hyp (u : ℤˣ) (w : NormalWord d)
(h2 : ∀ u' ∈ Option.map Prod.fst w.toList.head?,
w.head ∈ toSubgroup A B u → u = u') :
¬ Cancels u w := by
simp only [Cancels, Option.map_eq_some_iff, Prod.exists,
exists_and_right, exists_eq_right, not_and, not_exists]
intro hw x hx
rw [hx] at h2
simpa using h2 (-u) rfl hw
theorem unitsSMul_cancels_iff (u : ℤˣ) (w : NormalWord d) :
Cancels (-u) (unitsSMul φ u w) ↔ ¬ Cancels u w := by
by_cases h : Cancels u w
· simp only [unitsSMul, h, dite_true, not_true_eq_false, iff_false]
induction w using consRecOn with
| ofGroup => simp [Cancels, unitsSMulWithCancel]
| cons g u' w h1 h2 _ =>
intro hc
apply not_cancels_of_cons_hyp _ _ h2
simp only [Cancels, cons_head, cons_toList, List.head?_cons,
Option.map_some', Option.some.injEq] at h
cases h.2
simpa [Cancels, unitsSMulWithCancel,
Subgroup.mul_mem_cancel_left] using hc
· simp only [unitsSMul, dif_neg h]
simpa [Cancels] using h
theorem unitsSMul_neg (u : ℤˣ) (w : NormalWord d) :
unitsSMul φ (-u) (unitsSMul φ u w) = w := by
rw [unitsSMul]
split_ifs with hcan
· have hncan : ¬ Cancels u w := (unitsSMul_cancels_iff _ _ _).1 hcan
unfold unitsSMul
simp only [dif_neg hncan]
simp [unitsSMulWithCancel, unitsSMulGroup, (d.compl u).equiv_snd_eq_inv_mul,
-SetLike.coe_sort_coe]
· have hcan2 : Cancels u w := not_not.1 (mt (unitsSMul_cancels_iff _ _ _).2 hcan)
unfold unitsSMul at hcan ⊢
simp only [dif_pos hcan2] at hcan ⊢
cases w using consRecOn with
| ofGroup => simp [Cancels] at hcan2
| cons g u' w h1 h2 ih =>
clear ih
simp only [unitsSMulGroup, SetLike.coe_sort_coe, unitsSMulWithCancel, id_eq, consRecOn_cons,
group_smul_head, IsComplement.equiv_mul_left, map_mul, Submonoid.coe_mul, coe_toSubmonoid,
toSubgroupEquiv_neg_apply, mul_inv_rev]
cases hcan2.2
have : ((d.compl (-u)).equiv w.head).1 = 1 :=
(d.compl (-u)).equiv_fst_eq_one_of_mem_of_one_mem _ h1
apply NormalWord.ext
· -- This used to `simp [this]` before https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2644
dsimp
conv_lhs => erw [IsComplement.equiv_mul_left]
rw [map_mul, Submonoid.coe_mul, toSubgroupEquiv_neg_apply, this]
simp
· -- The next two lines were not needed before https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2644
dsimp
conv_lhs => erw [IsComplement.equiv_mul_left]
simp [mul_assoc, Units.ext_iff, (d.compl (-u)).equiv_snd_eq_inv_mul, this,
-SetLike.coe_sort_coe]
/-- the equivalence given by multiplication on the left by `t` -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def unitsSMulEquiv : NormalWord d ≃ NormalWord d :=
{ toFun := unitsSMul φ 1
invFun := unitsSMul φ (-1),
left_inv := fun _ => by rw [unitsSMul_neg]
right_inv := fun w => by convert unitsSMul_neg _ _ w; simp }
theorem unitsSMul_one_group_smul (g : A) (w : NormalWord d) :
unitsSMul φ 1 ((g : G) • w) = (φ g : G) • (unitsSMul φ 1 w) := by
unfold unitsSMul
have : Cancels 1 ((g : G) • w) ↔ Cancels 1 w := by
simp [Cancels, Subgroup.mul_mem_cancel_left]
by_cases hcan : Cancels 1 w
· simp [unitsSMulWithCancel, dif_pos (this.2 hcan), dif_pos hcan]
cases w using consRecOn
· simp [Cancels] at hcan
· simp only [smul_cons, consRecOn_cons, mul_smul]
rw [← mul_smul, ← Subgroup.coe_mul, ← map_mul φ]
rfl
· rw [dif_neg (mt this.1 hcan), dif_neg hcan]
simp [← mul_smul, mul_assoc, unitsSMulGroup]
-- This used to be the end of the proof before https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2644
dsimp
congr 1
· conv_lhs => erw [IsComplement.equiv_mul_left]
simp_rw [toSubgroup_one]
simp only [SetLike.coe_sort_coe, map_mul, Subgroup.coe_mul]
conv_lhs => erw [IsComplement.equiv_mul_left]
rfl
noncomputable instance : MulAction (HNNExtension G A B φ) (NormalWord d) :=
MulAction.ofEndHom <| (MulAction.toEndHom (M := Equiv.Perm (NormalWord d))).comp
(HNNExtension.lift (MulAction.toPermHom _ _) (unitsSMulEquiv φ) <| by
intro a
ext : 1
simp [unitsSMul_one_group_smul])
@[simp]
theorem prod_group_smul (g : G) (w : NormalWord d) :
(g • w).prod φ = of g * (w.prod φ) := by
simp [ReducedWord.prod, smul_def, mul_assoc]
theorem of_smul_eq_smul (g : G) (w : NormalWord d) :
(of g : HNNExtension G A B φ) • w = g • w := by
simp [instHSMul, SMul.smul, MulAction.toEndHom]
theorem t_smul_eq_unitsSMul (w : NormalWord d) :
(t : HNNExtension G A B φ) • w = unitsSMul φ 1 w := by
simp [instHSMul, SMul.smul, MulAction.toEndHom]
theorem t_pow_smul_eq_unitsSMul (u : ℤˣ) (w : NormalWord d) :
(t ^ (u : ℤ) : HNNExtension G A B φ) • w = unitsSMul φ u w := by
rcases Int.units_eq_one_or u with (rfl | rfl) <;>
simp [instHSMul, SMul.smul, MulAction.toEndHom, Equiv.Perm.inv_def]
@[simp]
theorem prod_cons (g : G) (u : ℤˣ) (w : NormalWord d) (h1 : w.head ∈ d.set u)
(h2 : ∀ u' ∈ Option.map Prod.fst w.toList.head?,
w.head ∈ toSubgroup A B u → u = u') :
(cons g u w h1 h2).prod φ = of g * (t ^ (u : ℤ) * w.prod φ) := by
simp [ReducedWord.prod, cons, smul_def, mul_assoc]
theorem prod_unitsSMul (u : ℤˣ) (w : NormalWord d) :
(unitsSMul φ u w).prod φ = (t^(u : ℤ) * w.prod φ : HNNExtension G A B φ) := by
rw [unitsSMul]
split_ifs with hcan
· cases w using consRecOn
· simp [Cancels] at hcan
· cases hcan.2
simp [unitsSMulWithCancel]
rcases Int.units_eq_one_or u with (rfl | rfl)
· simp [equiv_eq_conj, mul_assoc]
· simp [equiv_symm_eq_conj, mul_assoc]
-- This used to be the end of the proof before https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2644
erw [equiv_symm_eq_conj]
simp [equiv_symm_eq_conj, mul_assoc]
· simp [unitsSMulGroup]
rcases Int.units_eq_one_or u with (rfl | rfl)
· simp [equiv_eq_conj, mul_assoc, (d.compl _).equiv_snd_eq_inv_mul]
-- This used to be the end of the proof before https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2644
erw [(d.compl 1).equiv_snd_eq_inv_mul]
simp [equiv_eq_conj, mul_assoc, (d.compl _).equiv_snd_eq_inv_mul]
· simp [equiv_symm_eq_conj, mul_assoc, (d.compl _).equiv_snd_eq_inv_mul]
-- This used to be the end of the proof before https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2644
erw [equiv_symm_eq_conj, (d.compl (-1)).equiv_snd_eq_inv_mul]
simp [equiv_symm_eq_conj, mul_assoc, (d.compl _).equiv_snd_eq_inv_mul]
@[simp]
theorem prod_empty : (empty : NormalWord d).prod φ = 1 := by
simp [ReducedWord.prod]
@[simp]
theorem prod_smul (g : HNNExtension G A B φ) (w : NormalWord d) :
(g • w).prod φ = g * w.prod φ := by
induction g using induction_on generalizing w with
| of => simp [of_smul_eq_smul]
| t => simp [t_smul_eq_unitsSMul, prod_unitsSMul, mul_assoc]
| mul => simp_all [mul_smul, mul_assoc]
| inv x ih =>
rw [← mul_right_inj x, ← ih]
simp
@[simp]
theorem prod_smul_empty (w : NormalWord d) :
(w.prod φ) • empty = w := by
induction w using consRecOn with
| ofGroup => simp [ofGroup, ReducedWord.prod, of_smul_eq_smul, group_smul_def]
| cons g u w h1 h2 ih =>
rw [prod_cons, ← mul_assoc, mul_smul, ih, mul_smul, t_pow_smul_eq_unitsSMul,
of_smul_eq_smul, unitsSMul]
rw [dif_neg (not_cancels_of_cons_hyp u w h2)]
simp [unitsSMulGroup, (d.compl _).equiv_fst_eq_one_of_mem_of_one_mem (one_mem _) h1,
-SetLike.coe_sort_coe]
ext <;> simp [-SetLike.coe_sort_coe]
-- The next 3 lines were not needed before https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2644
rw [(d.compl _).equiv_snd_eq_inv_mul,
(d.compl _).equiv_fst_eq_one_of_mem_of_one_mem (one_mem _) h1]
simp
variable (d)
/-- The equivalence between elements of the HNN extension and words in normal form. -/
noncomputable def equiv : HNNExtension G A B φ ≃ NormalWord d :=
{ toFun := fun g => g • empty,
invFun := fun w => w.prod φ,
left_inv := fun g => by simp [prod_smul]
right_inv := fun w => by simp }
theorem prod_injective : Injective
(fun w => w.prod φ : NormalWord d → HNNExtension G A B φ) :=
(equiv φ d).symm.injective
instance : FaithfulSMul (HNNExtension G A B φ) (NormalWord d) :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using congr_arg (fun w => w.prod φ) (h empty)⟩
end NormalWord
open NormalWord
theorem of_injective : Function.Injective (of : G → HNNExtension G A B φ) := by
rcases TransversalPair.nonempty G A B with ⟨d⟩
refine Function.Injective.of_comp
(f := ((· • ·) : HNNExtension G A B φ → NormalWord d → NormalWord d)) ?_
intros _ _ h
exact eq_of_smul_eq_smul (fun w : NormalWord d =>
by simp_all [funext_iff, of_smul_eq_smul])
namespace ReducedWord
theorem exists_normalWord_prod_eq
(d : TransversalPair G A B) (w : ReducedWord G A B) :
∃ w' : NormalWord d, w'.prod φ = w.prod φ ∧
w'.toList.map Prod.fst = w.toList.map Prod.fst ∧
∀ u ∈ w.toList.head?.map Prod.fst,
w'.head⁻¹ * w.head ∈ toSubgroup A B (-u) := by
suffices ∀ w : ReducedWord G A B,
w.head = 1 → ∃ w' : NormalWord d, w'.prod φ = w.prod φ ∧
w'.toList.map Prod.fst = w.toList.map Prod.fst ∧
∀ u ∈ w.toList.head?.map Prod.fst,
w'.head ∈ toSubgroup A B (-u) by
by_cases hw1 : w.head = 1
· simp only [hw1, inv_mem_iff, mul_one]
exact this w hw1
· rcases this ⟨1, w.toList, w.chain⟩ rfl with ⟨w', hw'⟩
exact ⟨w.head • w', by
simpa [ReducedWord.prod, mul_assoc] using hw'⟩
intro w hw1
rcases w with ⟨g, l, chain⟩
dsimp at hw1; subst hw1
induction l with
| nil =>
exact
⟨{ head := 1
toList := []
mem_set := by simp
chain := List.chain'_nil }, by simp [prod]⟩
| cons a l ih =>
rcases ih (List.chain'_cons'.1 chain).2 with ⟨w', hw'1, hw'2, hw'3⟩
clear ih
refine ⟨(t^(a.1 : ℤ) * of a.2 : HNNExtension G A B φ) • w', ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [prod_smul, hw'1]
simp [ReducedWord.prod]
· have : ¬ Cancels a.1 (a.2 • w') := by
simp only [Cancels, group_smul_head, group_smul_toList, Option.map_eq_some_iff,
Prod.exists, exists_and_right, exists_eq_right, not_and, not_exists]
intro hS x hx
have hx' := congr_arg (Option.map Prod.fst) hx
rw [← List.head?_map, hw'2, List.head?_map, Option.map_some'] at hx'
have : w'.head ∈ toSubgroup A B a.fst := by
simpa using hw'3 _ hx'
rw [mul_mem_cancel_right this] at hS
have : a.fst = -a.fst := by
have hl : l ≠ [] := by rintro rfl; simp_all
have : a.fst = (l.head hl).fst := (List.chain'_cons'.1 chain).1 (l.head hl)
(List.head?_eq_head _) hS
rwa [List.head?_eq_head hl, Option.map_some', ← this, Option.some_inj] at hx'
simp at this
rw [List.map_cons, mul_smul, of_smul_eq_smul, NormalWord.group_smul_def,
t_pow_smul_eq_unitsSMul, unitsSMul]
erw [dif_neg this]
rw [← hw'2]
simp [mul_assoc, unitsSMulGroup, (d.compl _).coe_equiv_snd_eq_one_iff_mem]
/-- Two reduced words representing the same element of the `HNNExtension G A B φ` have the same
length corresponding list, with the same pattern of occurrences of `t^1` and `t^(-1)`,
and also the `head` is in the same left coset of `toSubgroup A B (-u)`, where `u : ℤˣ`
is the exponent of the first occurrence of `t` in the word. -/
theorem map_fst_eq_and_of_prod_eq {w₁ w₂ : ReducedWord G A B}
(hprod : w₁.prod φ = w₂.prod φ) :
w₁.toList.map Prod.fst = w₂.toList.map Prod.fst ∧
∀ u ∈ w₁.toList.head?.map Prod.fst,
w₁.head⁻¹ * w₂.head ∈ toSubgroup A B (-u) := by
rcases TransversalPair.nonempty G A B with ⟨d⟩
rcases exists_normalWord_prod_eq φ d w₁ with ⟨w₁', hw₁'1, hw₁'2, hw₁'3⟩
rcases exists_normalWord_prod_eq φ d w₂ with ⟨w₂', hw₂'1, hw₂'2, hw₂'3⟩
have : w₁' = w₂' :=
NormalWord.prod_injective φ d (by dsimp only; rw [hw₁'1, hw₂'1, hprod])
subst this
refine ⟨by rw [← hw₁'2, hw₂'2], ?_⟩
simp only [← leftCoset_eq_iff] at *
intro u hu
rw [← hw₁'3 _ hu, ← hw₂'3 _]
rwa [← List.head?_map, ← hw₂'2, hw₁'2, List.head?_map]
/-- **Britton's Lemma**. Any reduced word whose product is an element of `G`, has no
occurrences of `t`. -/
theorem toList_eq_nil_of_mem_of_range (w : ReducedWord G A B)
(hw : w.prod φ ∈ (of.range : Subgroup (HNNExtension G A B φ))) :
w.toList = [] := by
rcases hw with ⟨g, hg⟩
| let w' : ReducedWord G A B := { ReducedWord.empty G A B with head := g }
have : w.prod φ = w'.prod φ := by simp [w', ReducedWord.prod, hg]
simpa [w'] using (map_fst_eq_and_of_prod_eq φ this).1
end ReducedWord
end HNNExtension
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/HNNExtension.lean | 678 | 684 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.MFDeriv.FDeriv
/-!
# Differentiability of specific functions
In this file, we establish differentiability results for
- continuous linear maps and continuous linear equivalences
- the identity
- constant functions
- products
- arithmetic operations (such as addition and scalar multiplication).
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Manifold
open Bundle Set Topology
section SpecificFunctions
/-! ### Differentiability of specific functions -/
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
-- declare a charted space `M` over the pair `(E, H)`.
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] {I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H} {M : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
-- declare a charted space `M'` over the pair `(E', H')`.
{E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H']
{I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'} {M' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M'] [ChartedSpace H' M']
-- declare a charted space `M''` over the pair `(E'', H'')`.
{E'' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E''] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'']
{H'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H''] {I'' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E'' H''} {M'' : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace M''] [ChartedSpace H'' M'']
-- declare a charted space `N` over the pair `(F, G)`.
{F : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] {G : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G]
{J : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 F G} {N : Type*} [TopologicalSpace N] [ChartedSpace G N]
-- declare a charted space `N'` over the pair `(F', G')`.
{F' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F'] {G' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G']
{J' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 F' G'} {N' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace N'] [ChartedSpace G' N']
-- F₁, F₂, F₃, F₄ are normed spaces
{F₁ : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup F₁] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F₁] {F₂ : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F₂]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 F₂] {F₃ : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F₃] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F₃] {F₄ : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup F₄] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F₄]
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
variable (f : E →L[𝕜] E') {s : Set E} {x : E}
protected theorem hasMFDerivWithinAt : HasMFDerivWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f s x f :=
f.hasFDerivWithinAt.hasMFDerivWithinAt
protected theorem hasMFDerivAt : HasMFDerivAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f x f :=
f.hasFDerivAt.hasMFDerivAt
protected theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt : MDifferentiableWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f s x :=
f.differentiableWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt
protected theorem mdifferentiableOn : MDifferentiableOn 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f s :=
f.differentiableOn.mdifferentiableOn
protected theorem mdifferentiableAt : MDifferentiableAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f x :=
f.differentiableAt.mdifferentiableAt
protected theorem mdifferentiable : MDifferentiable 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f :=
f.differentiable.mdifferentiable
theorem mfderiv_eq : mfderiv 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f x = f :=
f.hasMFDerivAt.mfderiv
theorem mfderivWithin_eq (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) s x) :
mfderivWithin 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f s x = f :=
f.hasMFDerivWithinAt.mfderivWithin hs
end ContinuousLinearMap
namespace ContinuousLinearEquiv
variable (f : E ≃L[𝕜] E') {s : Set E} {x : E}
protected theorem hasMFDerivWithinAt : HasMFDerivWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f s x (f : E →L[𝕜] E') :=
f.hasFDerivWithinAt.hasMFDerivWithinAt
protected theorem hasMFDerivAt : HasMFDerivAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f x (f : E →L[𝕜] E') :=
f.hasFDerivAt.hasMFDerivAt
protected theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt : MDifferentiableWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f s x :=
f.differentiableWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt
protected theorem mdifferentiableOn : MDifferentiableOn 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f s :=
f.differentiableOn.mdifferentiableOn
protected theorem mdifferentiableAt : MDifferentiableAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f x :=
f.differentiableAt.mdifferentiableAt
protected theorem mdifferentiable : MDifferentiable 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f :=
f.differentiable.mdifferentiable
theorem mfderiv_eq : mfderiv 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f x = (f : E →L[𝕜] E') :=
f.hasMFDerivAt.mfderiv
theorem mfderivWithin_eq (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) s x) :
mfderivWithin 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f s x = (f : E →L[𝕜] E') :=
f.hasMFDerivWithinAt.mfderivWithin hs
end ContinuousLinearEquiv
variable {s : Set M} {x : M}
section id
/-! #### Identity -/
theorem hasMFDerivAt_id (x : M) :
HasMFDerivAt I I (@id M) x (ContinuousLinearMap.id 𝕜 (TangentSpace I x)) := by
refine ⟨continuousAt_id, ?_⟩
have : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[range I] (extChartAt I x) x, (extChartAt I x ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm) y = y := by
apply Filter.mem_of_superset (extChartAt_target_mem_nhdsWithin x)
mfld_set_tac
apply HasFDerivWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq (hasFDerivWithinAt_id _ _) this
simp only [mfld_simps]
theorem hasMFDerivWithinAt_id (s : Set M) (x : M) :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I I (@id M) s x (ContinuousLinearMap.id 𝕜 (TangentSpace I x)) :=
(hasMFDerivAt_id x).hasMFDerivWithinAt
theorem mdifferentiableAt_id : MDifferentiableAt I I (@id M) x :=
(hasMFDerivAt_id x).mdifferentiableAt
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_id : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I (@id M) s x :=
mdifferentiableAt_id.mdifferentiableWithinAt
theorem mdifferentiable_id : MDifferentiable I I (@id M) := fun _ => mdifferentiableAt_id
theorem mdifferentiableOn_id : MDifferentiableOn I I (@id M) s :=
mdifferentiable_id.mdifferentiableOn
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mfderiv_id : mfderiv I I (@id M) x = ContinuousLinearMap.id 𝕜 (TangentSpace I x) :=
HasMFDerivAt.mfderiv (hasMFDerivAt_id x)
theorem mfderivWithin_id (hxs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) :
mfderivWithin I I (@id M) s x = ContinuousLinearMap.id 𝕜 (TangentSpace I x) := by
rw [MDifferentiable.mfderivWithin mdifferentiableAt_id hxs]
exact mfderiv_id
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem tangentMap_id : tangentMap I I (id : M → M) = id := by ext1 ⟨x, v⟩; simp [tangentMap]
theorem tangentMapWithin_id {p : TangentBundle I M} (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s p.proj) :
tangentMapWithin I I (id : M → M) s p = p := by
simp only [tangentMapWithin, id]
rw [mfderivWithin_id]
· rcases p with ⟨⟩; rfl
· exact hs
end id
section Const
/-! #### Constants -/
variable {c : M'}
theorem hasMFDerivAt_const (c : M') (x : M) :
HasMFDerivAt I I' (fun _ : M => c) x (0 : TangentSpace I x →L[𝕜] TangentSpace I' c) := by
refine ⟨continuous_const.continuousAt, ?_⟩
simp only [writtenInExtChartAt, Function.comp_def, hasFDerivWithinAt_const]
theorem hasMFDerivWithinAt_const (c : M') (s : Set M) (x : M) :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' (fun _ : M => c) s x (0 : TangentSpace I x →L[𝕜] TangentSpace I' c) :=
(hasMFDerivAt_const c x).hasMFDerivWithinAt
theorem mdifferentiableAt_const : MDifferentiableAt I I' (fun _ : M => c) x :=
(hasMFDerivAt_const c x).mdifferentiableAt
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_const : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' (fun _ : M => c) s x :=
mdifferentiableAt_const.mdifferentiableWithinAt
theorem mdifferentiable_const : MDifferentiable I I' fun _ : M => c := fun _ =>
mdifferentiableAt_const
theorem mdifferentiableOn_const : MDifferentiableOn I I' (fun _ : M => c) s :=
mdifferentiable_const.mdifferentiableOn
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mfderiv_const :
mfderiv I I' (fun _ : M => c) x = (0 : TangentSpace I x →L[𝕜] TangentSpace I' c) :=
HasMFDerivAt.mfderiv (hasMFDerivAt_const c x)
theorem mfderivWithin_const :
mfderivWithin I I' (fun _ : M => c) s x = (0 : TangentSpace I x →L[𝕜] TangentSpace I' c) :=
(hasMFDerivWithinAt_const _ _ _).mfderivWithin_eq_zero
end Const
section Prod
/-! ### Operations on the product of two manifolds -/
theorem hasMFDerivAt_fst (x : M × M') :
HasMFDerivAt (I.prod I') I Prod.fst x
(ContinuousLinearMap.fst 𝕜 (TangentSpace I x.1) (TangentSpace I' x.2)) := by
refine ⟨continuous_fst.continuousAt, ?_⟩
have :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[range (I.prod I')] extChartAt (I.prod I') x x,
(extChartAt I x.1 ∘ Prod.fst ∘ (extChartAt (I.prod I') x).symm) y = y.1 := by
/- porting note: was
apply Filter.mem_of_superset (extChartAt_target_mem_nhdsWithin (I.prod I') x)
mfld_set_tac
-/
filter_upwards [extChartAt_target_mem_nhdsWithin x] with y hy
rw [extChartAt_prod] at hy
exact (extChartAt I x.1).right_inv hy.1
apply HasFDerivWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq hasFDerivWithinAt_fst this
-- Porting note: next line was `simp only [mfld_simps]`
exact (extChartAt I x.1).right_inv <| (extChartAt I x.1).map_source (mem_extChartAt_source _)
|
theorem hasMFDerivWithinAt_fst (s : Set (M × M')) (x : M × M') :
HasMFDerivWithinAt (I.prod I') I Prod.fst s x
(ContinuousLinearMap.fst 𝕜 (TangentSpace I x.1) (TangentSpace I' x.2)) :=
(hasMFDerivAt_fst x).hasMFDerivWithinAt
theorem mdifferentiableAt_fst {x : M × M'} : MDifferentiableAt (I.prod I') I Prod.fst x :=
(hasMFDerivAt_fst x).mdifferentiableAt
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_fst {s : Set (M × M')} {x : M × M'} :
MDifferentiableWithinAt (I.prod I') I Prod.fst s x :=
mdifferentiableAt_fst.mdifferentiableWithinAt
theorem mdifferentiable_fst : MDifferentiable (I.prod I') I (Prod.fst : M × M' → M) := fun _ =>
mdifferentiableAt_fst
theorem mdifferentiableOn_fst {s : Set (M × M')} : MDifferentiableOn (I.prod I') I Prod.fst s :=
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/MFDeriv/SpecificFunctions.lean | 228 | 244 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Data.Sum.Order
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.PPWithUniv
/-!
# Ordinals
Ordinals are defined as equivalences of well-ordered sets under order isomorphism. They are endowed
with a total order, where an ordinal is smaller than another one if it embeds into it as an
initial segment (or, equivalently, in any way). This total order is well founded.
## Main definitions
* `Ordinal`: the type of ordinals (in a given universe)
* `Ordinal.type r`: given a well-founded order `r`, this is the corresponding ordinal
* `Ordinal.typein r a`: given a well-founded order `r` on a type `α`, and `a : α`, the ordinal
corresponding to all elements smaller than `a`.
* `enum r ⟨o, h⟩`: given a well-order `r` on a type `α`, and an ordinal `o` strictly smaller than
the ordinal corresponding to `r` (this is the assumption `h`), returns the `o`-th element of `α`.
In other words, the elements of `α` can be enumerated using ordinals up to `type r`.
* `Ordinal.card o`: the cardinality of an ordinal `o`.
* `Ordinal.lift` lifts an ordinal in universe `u` to an ordinal in universe `max u v`.
For a version registering additionally that this is an initial segment embedding, see
`Ordinal.liftInitialSeg`.
For a version registering that it is a principal segment embedding if `u < v`, see
`Ordinal.liftPrincipalSeg`.
* `Ordinal.omega0` or `ω` is the order type of `ℕ`. It is called this to match `Cardinal.aleph0`
and so that the omega function can be named `Ordinal.omega`. This definition is universe
polymorphic: `Ordinal.omega0.{u} : Ordinal.{u}` (contrast with `ℕ : Type`, which lives in
a specific universe). In some cases the universe level has to be given explicitly.
* `o₁ + o₂` is the order on the disjoint union of `o₁` and `o₂` obtained by declaring that
every element of `o₁` is smaller than every element of `o₂`.
The main properties of addition (and the other operations on ordinals) are stated and proved in
`Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean`.
Here, we only introduce it and prove its basic properties to deduce the fact that the order on
ordinals is total (and well founded).
* `succ o` is the successor of the ordinal `o`.
* `Cardinal.ord c`: when `c` is a cardinal, `ord c` is the smallest ordinal with this cardinality.
It is the canonical way to represent a cardinal with an ordinal.
A conditionally complete linear order with bot structure is registered on ordinals, where `⊥` is
`0`, the ordinal corresponding to the empty type, and `Inf` is the minimum for nonempty sets and `0`
for the empty set by convention.
## Notations
* `ω` is a notation for the first infinite ordinal in the locale `Ordinal`.
-/
assert_not_exists Module Field
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Equiv Order
open scoped Cardinal InitialSeg
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
{r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} {t : γ → γ → Prop}
/-! ### Definition of ordinals -/
/-- Bundled structure registering a well order on a type. Ordinals will be defined as a quotient
of this type. -/
structure WellOrder : Type (u + 1) where
/-- The underlying type of the order. -/
α : Type u
/-- The underlying relation of the order. -/
r : α → α → Prop
/-- The proposition that `r` is a well-ordering for `α`. -/
wo : IsWellOrder α r
attribute [instance] WellOrder.wo
namespace WellOrder
instance inhabited : Inhabited WellOrder :=
⟨⟨PEmpty, _, inferInstanceAs (IsWellOrder PEmpty EmptyRelation)⟩⟩
end WellOrder
/-- Equivalence relation on well orders on arbitrary types in universe `u`, given by order
isomorphism. -/
instance Ordinal.isEquivalent : Setoid WellOrder where
r := fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ => Nonempty (r ≃r s)
iseqv :=
⟨fun _ => ⟨RelIso.refl _⟩, fun ⟨e⟩ => ⟨e.symm⟩, fun ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩ => ⟨e₁.trans e₂⟩⟩
/-- `Ordinal.{u}` is the type of well orders in `Type u`, up to order isomorphism. -/
@[pp_with_univ]
def Ordinal : Type (u + 1) :=
Quotient Ordinal.isEquivalent
/-- A "canonical" type order-isomorphic to the ordinal `o`, living in the same universe. This is
defined through the axiom of choice.
Use this over `Iio o` only when it is paramount to have a `Type u` rather than a `Type (u + 1)`. -/
def Ordinal.toType (o : Ordinal.{u}) : Type u :=
o.out.α
instance hasWellFounded_toType (o : Ordinal) : WellFoundedRelation o.toType :=
⟨o.out.r, o.out.wo.wf⟩
instance linearOrder_toType (o : Ordinal) : LinearOrder o.toType :=
@IsWellOrder.linearOrder _ o.out.r o.out.wo
instance wellFoundedLT_toType_lt (o : Ordinal) : WellFoundedLT o.toType :=
o.out.wo.toIsWellFounded
namespace Ordinal
noncomputable instance (o : Ordinal) : SuccOrder o.toType :=
SuccOrder.ofLinearWellFoundedLT o.toType
/-! ### Basic properties of the order type -/
/-- The order type of a well order is an ordinal. -/
def type (r : α → α → Prop) [wo : IsWellOrder α r] : Ordinal :=
⟦⟨α, r, wo⟩⟧
/-- `typeLT α` is an abbreviation for the order type of the `<` relation of `α`. -/
scoped notation "typeLT " α:70 => @Ordinal.type α (· < ·) inferInstance
instance zero : Zero Ordinal :=
⟨type <| @EmptyRelation PEmpty⟩
instance inhabited : Inhabited Ordinal :=
⟨0⟩
instance one : One Ordinal :=
⟨type <| @EmptyRelation PUnit⟩
@[simp]
theorem type_toType (o : Ordinal) : typeLT o.toType = o :=
o.out_eq
theorem type_eq {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] :
type r = type s ↔ Nonempty (r ≃r s) :=
Quotient.eq'
theorem _root_.RelIso.ordinal_type_eq {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] (h : r ≃r s) : type r = type s :=
type_eq.2 ⟨h⟩
theorem type_eq_zero_of_empty (r) [IsWellOrder α r] [IsEmpty α] : type r = 0 :=
(RelIso.relIsoOfIsEmpty r _).ordinal_type_eq
@[simp]
theorem type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty [IsWellOrder α r] : type r = 0 ↔ IsEmpty α :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨s⟩ := type_eq.1 h
s.toEquiv.isEmpty,
@type_eq_zero_of_empty α r _⟩
theorem type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty [IsWellOrder α r] : type r ≠ 0 ↔ Nonempty α := by simp
theorem type_ne_zero_of_nonempty (r) [IsWellOrder α r] [h : Nonempty α] : type r ≠ 0 :=
type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty.2 h
theorem type_pEmpty : type (@EmptyRelation PEmpty) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem type_empty : type (@EmptyRelation Empty) = 0 :=
type_eq_zero_of_empty _
theorem type_eq_one_of_unique (r) [IsWellOrder α r] [Nonempty α] [Subsingleton α] : type r = 1 := by
cases nonempty_unique α
exact (RelIso.ofUniqueOfIrrefl r _).ordinal_type_eq
@[simp]
theorem type_eq_one_iff_unique [IsWellOrder α r] : type r = 1 ↔ Nonempty (Unique α) :=
⟨fun h ↦ let ⟨s⟩ := type_eq.1 h; ⟨s.toEquiv.unique⟩,
fun ⟨_⟩ ↦ type_eq_one_of_unique r⟩
theorem type_pUnit : type (@EmptyRelation PUnit) = 1 :=
rfl
theorem type_unit : type (@EmptyRelation Unit) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toType_empty_iff_eq_zero {o : Ordinal} : IsEmpty o.toType ↔ o = 0 := by
rw [← @type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty o.toType (· < ·), type_toType]
instance isEmpty_toType_zero : IsEmpty (toType 0) :=
toType_empty_iff_eq_zero.2 rfl
@[simp]
theorem toType_nonempty_iff_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} : Nonempty o.toType ↔ o ≠ 0 := by
rw [← @type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty o.toType (· < ·), type_toType]
protected theorem one_ne_zero : (1 : Ordinal) ≠ 0 :=
type_ne_zero_of_nonempty _
instance nontrivial : Nontrivial Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨⟨1, 0, Ordinal.one_ne_zero⟩⟩
/-- `Quotient.inductionOn` specialized to ordinals.
Not to be confused with well-founded recursion `Ordinal.induction`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn {C : Ordinal → Prop} (o : Ordinal)
(H : ∀ (α r) [IsWellOrder α r], C (type r)) : C o :=
Quot.inductionOn o fun ⟨α, r, wo⟩ => @H α r wo
/-- `Quotient.inductionOn₂` specialized to ordinals.
Not to be confused with well-founded recursion `Ordinal.induction`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn₂ {C : Ordinal → Ordinal → Prop} (o₁ o₂ : Ordinal)
(H : ∀ (α r) [IsWellOrder α r] (β s) [IsWellOrder β s], C (type r) (type s)) : C o₁ o₂ :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ o₁ o₂ fun ⟨α, r, wo₁⟩ ⟨β, s, wo₂⟩ => @H α r wo₁ β s wo₂
/-- `Quotient.inductionOn₃` specialized to ordinals.
Not to be confused with well-founded recursion `Ordinal.induction`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn₃ {C : Ordinal → Ordinal → Ordinal → Prop} (o₁ o₂ o₃ : Ordinal)
(H : ∀ (α r) [IsWellOrder α r] (β s) [IsWellOrder β s] (γ t) [IsWellOrder γ t],
C (type r) (type s) (type t)) : C o₁ o₂ o₃ :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ o₁ o₂ o₃ fun ⟨α, r, wo₁⟩ ⟨β, s, wo₂⟩ ⟨γ, t, wo₃⟩ =>
@H α r wo₁ β s wo₂ γ t wo₃
open Classical in
/-- To prove a result on ordinals, it suffices to prove it for order types of well-orders. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOnWellOrder {C : Ordinal → Prop} (o : Ordinal)
(H : ∀ (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedLT α], C (typeLT α)) : C o :=
inductionOn o fun α r wo ↦ @H α (linearOrderOfSTO r) wo.toIsWellFounded
open Classical in
/-- To define a function on ordinals, it suffices to define them on order types of well-orders.
Since `LinearOrder` is data-carrying, `liftOnWellOrder_type` is not a definitional equality, unlike
`Quotient.liftOn_mk` which is always def-eq. -/
def liftOnWellOrder {δ : Sort v} (o : Ordinal) (f : ∀ (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedLT α], δ)
(c : ∀ (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedLT α] (β) [LinearOrder β] [WellFoundedLT β],
typeLT α = typeLT β → f α = f β) : δ :=
Quotient.liftOn o (fun w ↦ @f w.α (linearOrderOfSTO w.r) w.wo.toIsWellFounded)
fun w₁ w₂ h ↦ @c
w₁.α (linearOrderOfSTO w₁.r) w₁.wo.toIsWellFounded
w₂.α (linearOrderOfSTO w₂.r) w₂.wo.toIsWellFounded
(Quotient.sound h)
@[simp]
theorem liftOnWellOrder_type {δ : Sort v} (f : ∀ (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedLT α], δ)
(c : ∀ (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedLT α] (β) [LinearOrder β] [WellFoundedLT β],
typeLT α = typeLT β → f α = f β) {γ} [LinearOrder γ] [WellFoundedLT γ] :
liftOnWellOrder (typeLT γ) f c = f γ := by
change Quotient.liftOn' ⟦_⟧ _ _ = _
rw [Quotient.liftOn'_mk]
congr
exact LinearOrder.ext_lt fun _ _ ↦ Iff.rfl
/-! ### The order on ordinals -/
/--
For `Ordinal`:
* less-equal is defined such that well orders `r` and `s` satisfy `type r ≤ type s` if there exists
a function embedding `r` as an *initial* segment of `s`.
* less-than is defined such that well orders `r` and `s` satisfy `type r < type s` if there exists
a function embedding `r` as a *principal* segment of `s`.
Note that most of the relevant results on initial and principal segments are proved in the
`Order.InitialSeg` file.
-/
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder Ordinal where
le a b :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ a b (fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ => Nonempty (r ≼i s))
fun _ _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ => propext
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => ⟨f.symm.toInitialSeg.trans <| h.trans g.toInitialSeg⟩, fun ⟨h⟩ =>
⟨f.toInitialSeg.trans <| h.trans g.symm.toInitialSeg⟩⟩
lt a b :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ a b (fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ => Nonempty (r ≺i s))
fun _ _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ => propext
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => ⟨PrincipalSeg.relIsoTrans f.symm <| h.transRelIso g⟩,
fun ⟨h⟩ => ⟨PrincipalSeg.relIsoTrans f <| h.transRelIso g.symm⟩⟩
le_refl := Quot.ind fun ⟨_, _, _⟩ => ⟨InitialSeg.refl _⟩
le_trans a b c :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ => ⟨f.trans g⟩
lt_iff_le_not_le a b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun _ _ =>
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨⟨f⟩, fun ⟨g⟩ => (f.transInitial g).irrefl⟩, fun ⟨⟨f⟩, h⟩ =>
f.principalSumRelIso.recOn (fun g => ⟨g⟩) fun g => (h ⟨g.symm.toInitialSeg⟩).elim⟩
le_antisymm a b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun _ _ ⟨h₁⟩ ⟨h₂⟩ =>
Quot.sound ⟨InitialSeg.antisymm h₁ h₂⟩
instance : LinearOrder Ordinal :=
{inferInstanceAs (PartialOrder Ordinal) with
le_total := fun a b => Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ =>
(InitialSeg.total r s).recOn (fun f => Or.inl ⟨f⟩) fun f => Or.inr ⟨f⟩
toDecidableLE := Classical.decRel _ }
theorem _root_.InitialSeg.ordinal_type_le {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (h : r ≼i s) : type r ≤ type s :=
⟨h⟩
theorem _root_.RelEmbedding.ordinal_type_le {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (h : r ↪r s) : type r ≤ type s :=
⟨h.collapse⟩
theorem _root_.PrincipalSeg.ordinal_type_lt {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (h : r ≺i s) : type r < type s :=
⟨h⟩
@[simp]
protected theorem zero_le (o : Ordinal) : 0 ≤ o :=
inductionOn o fun _ r _ => (InitialSeg.ofIsEmpty _ r).ordinal_type_le
instance : OrderBot Ordinal where
bot := 0
bot_le := Ordinal.zero_le
@[simp]
theorem bot_eq_zero : (⊥ : Ordinal) = 0 :=
rfl
instance instIsEmptyIioZero : IsEmpty (Iio (0 : Ordinal)) := by
simp [← bot_eq_zero]
@[simp]
protected theorem le_zero {o : Ordinal} : o ≤ 0 ↔ o = 0 :=
le_bot_iff
protected theorem pos_iff_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} : 0 < o ↔ o ≠ 0 :=
bot_lt_iff_ne_bot
protected theorem not_lt_zero (o : Ordinal) : ¬o < 0 :=
not_lt_bot
theorem eq_zero_or_pos : ∀ a : Ordinal, a = 0 ∨ 0 < a :=
eq_bot_or_bot_lt
instance : ZeroLEOneClass Ordinal :=
⟨Ordinal.zero_le _⟩
instance instNeZeroOne : NeZero (1 : Ordinal) :=
⟨Ordinal.one_ne_zero⟩
theorem type_le_iff {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type r ≤ type s ↔ Nonempty (r ≼i s) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem type_le_iff' {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type r ≤ type s ↔ Nonempty (r ↪r s) :=
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨f⟩, fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨f.collapse⟩⟩
theorem type_lt_iff {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type r < type s ↔ Nonempty (r ≺i s) :=
Iff.rfl
/-- Given two ordinals `α ≤ β`, then `initialSegToType α β` is the initial segment embedding of
`α.toType` into `β.toType`. -/
def initialSegToType {α β : Ordinal} (h : α ≤ β) : α.toType ≤i β.toType := by
apply Classical.choice (type_le_iff.mp _)
rwa [type_toType, type_toType]
/-- Given two ordinals `α < β`, then `principalSegToType α β` is the principal segment embedding
of `α.toType` into `β.toType`. -/
def principalSegToType {α β : Ordinal} (h : α < β) : α.toType <i β.toType := by
apply Classical.choice (type_lt_iff.mp _)
rwa [type_toType, type_toType]
/-! ### Enumerating elements in a well-order with ordinals -/
/-- The order type of an element inside a well order.
This is registered as a principal segment embedding into the ordinals, with top `type r`. -/
def typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : @PrincipalSeg α Ordinal.{u} r (· < ·) := by
refine ⟨RelEmbedding.ofMonotone _ fun a b ha ↦
((PrincipalSeg.ofElement r a).codRestrict _ ?_ ?_).ordinal_type_lt, type r, fun a ↦ ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨c, hc⟩
exact trans hc ha
· exact ha
· rintro ⟨b, rfl⟩
exact (PrincipalSeg.ofElement _ _).ordinal_type_lt
· refine inductionOn a ?_
rintro β s wo ⟨g⟩
exact ⟨_, g.subrelIso.ordinal_type_eq⟩
@[simp]
theorem type_subrel (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (a : α) :
type (Subrel r (r · a)) = typein r a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : (typein r).top = type r :=
rfl
theorem typein_lt_type (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (a : α) : typein r a < type r :=
(typein r).lt_top a
theorem typein_lt_self {o : Ordinal} (i : o.toType) : typein (α := o.toType) (· < ·) i < o := by
simp_rw [← type_toType o]
apply typein_lt_type
@[simp]
theorem typein_top {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≺i s) : typein s f.top = type r :=
f.subrelIso.ordinal_type_eq
@[simp]
theorem typein_lt_typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {a b : α} :
typein r a < typein r b ↔ r a b :=
(typein r).map_rel_iff
@[simp]
theorem typein_le_typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {a b : α} :
typein r a ≤ typein r b ↔ ¬r b a := by
rw [← not_lt, typein_lt_typein]
theorem typein_injective (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : Injective (typein r) :=
(typein r).injective
theorem typein_inj (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {a b} : typein r a = typein r b ↔ a = b :=
(typein_injective r).eq_iff
theorem mem_range_typein_iff (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {o} :
o ∈ Set.range (typein r) ↔ o < type r :=
(typein r).mem_range_iff_rel
theorem typein_surj (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {o} (h : o < type r) :
o ∈ Set.range (typein r) :=
(typein r).mem_range_of_rel_top h
theorem typein_surjOn (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] :
Set.SurjOn (typein r) Set.univ (Set.Iio (type r)) :=
(typein r).surjOn
/-- A well order `r` is order-isomorphic to the set of ordinals smaller than `type r`.
`enum r ⟨o, h⟩` is the `o`-th element of `α` ordered by `r`.
That is, `enum` maps an initial segment of the ordinals, those less than the order type of `r`, to
the elements of `α`. -/
@[simps! symm_apply_coe]
def enum (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : (· < · : Iio (type r) → Iio (type r) → Prop) ≃r r :=
(typein r).subrelIso
@[simp]
theorem typein_enum (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {o} (h : o < type r) :
typein r (enum r ⟨o, h⟩) = o :=
(typein r).apply_subrelIso _
theorem enum_type {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s]
(f : s ≺i r) {h : type s < type r} : enum r ⟨type s, h⟩ = f.top :=
(typein r).injective <| (typein_enum _ _).trans (typein_top _).symm
@[simp]
theorem enum_typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (a : α) :
enum r ⟨typein r a, typein_lt_type r a⟩ = a :=
enum_type (PrincipalSeg.ofElement r a)
theorem enum_lt_enum {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] {o₁ o₂ : Iio (type r)} :
r (enum r o₁) (enum r o₂) ↔ o₁ < o₂ :=
(enum _).map_rel_iff
theorem enum_le_enum (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {o₁ o₂ : Iio (type r)} :
¬r (enum r o₁) (enum r o₂) ↔ o₂ ≤ o₁ := by
rw [enum_lt_enum (r := r), not_lt]
-- TODO: generalize to other well-orders
@[simp]
theorem enum_le_enum' (a : Ordinal) {o₁ o₂ : Iio (type (· < ·))} :
enum (· < ·) o₁ ≤ enum (α := a.toType) (· < ·) o₂ ↔ o₁ ≤ o₂ := by
rw [← enum_le_enum, not_lt]
theorem enum_inj {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] {o₁ o₂ : Iio (type r)} :
enum r o₁ = enum r o₂ ↔ o₁ = o₂ :=
EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq _
theorem enum_zero_le {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] (h0 : 0 < type r) (a : α) :
¬r a (enum r ⟨0, h0⟩) := by
rw [← enum_typein r a, enum_le_enum r]
apply Ordinal.zero_le
theorem enum_zero_le' {o : Ordinal} (h0 : 0 < o) (a : o.toType) :
enum (α := o.toType) (· < ·) ⟨0, type_toType _ ▸ h0⟩ ≤ a := by
rw [← not_lt]
apply enum_zero_le
theorem relIso_enum' {α β : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≃r s) (o : Ordinal) :
∀ (hr : o < type r) (hs : o < type s), f (enum r ⟨o, hr⟩) = enum s ⟨o, hs⟩ := by
refine inductionOn o ?_; rintro γ t wo ⟨g⟩ ⟨h⟩
rw [enum_type g, enum_type (g.transRelIso f)]; rfl
theorem relIso_enum {α β : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≃r s) (o : Ordinal) (hr : o < type r) :
f (enum r ⟨o, hr⟩) = enum s ⟨o, hr.trans_eq (Quotient.sound ⟨f⟩)⟩ :=
relIso_enum' _ _ _ _
/-- The order isomorphism between ordinals less than `o` and `o.toType`. -/
@[simps! -isSimp]
noncomputable def enumIsoToType (o : Ordinal) : Set.Iio o ≃o o.toType where
toFun x := enum (α := o.toType) (· < ·) ⟨x.1, type_toType _ ▸ x.2⟩
invFun x := ⟨typein (α := o.toType) (· < ·) x, typein_lt_self x⟩
left_inv _ := Subtype.ext_val (typein_enum _ _)
right_inv _ := enum_typein _ _
map_rel_iff' := enum_le_enum' _
instance small_Iio (o : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Iio o) :=
⟨_, ⟨(enumIsoToType _).toEquiv⟩⟩
instance small_Iic (o : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Iic o) := by
rw [← Iio_union_right]
infer_instance
instance small_Ico (a b : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ico a b) := small_subset Ico_subset_Iio_self
instance small_Icc (a b : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Icc a b) := small_subset Icc_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Ioo (a b : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ioo a b) := small_subset Ioo_subset_Iio_self
instance small_Ioc (a b : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ioc a b) := small_subset Ioc_subset_Iic_self
/-- `o.toType` is an `OrderBot` whenever `o ≠ 0`. -/
def toTypeOrderBot {o : Ordinal} (ho : o ≠ 0) : OrderBot o.toType where
bot := (enum (· < ·)) ⟨0, _⟩
bot_le := enum_zero_le' (by rwa [Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero])
/-- `o.toType` is an `OrderBot` whenever `0 < o`. -/
@[deprecated "use toTypeOrderBot" (since := "2025-02-13")]
def toTypeOrderBotOfPos {o : Ordinal} (ho : 0 < o) : OrderBot o.toType where
bot := (enum (· < ·)) ⟨0, _⟩
bot_le := enum_zero_le' ho
theorem enum_zero_eq_bot {o : Ordinal} (ho : 0 < o) :
enum (α := o.toType) (· < ·) ⟨0, by rwa [type_toType]⟩ =
have H := toTypeOrderBot (o := o) (by rintro rfl; simp at ho)
(⊥ : o.toType) :=
rfl
theorem lt_wf : @WellFounded Ordinal (· < ·) :=
wellFounded_iff_wellFounded_subrel.mpr (·.induction_on fun ⟨_, _, wo⟩ ↦
RelHomClass.wellFounded (enum _) wo.wf)
instance wellFoundedRelation : WellFoundedRelation Ordinal :=
⟨(· < ·), lt_wf⟩
instance wellFoundedLT : WellFoundedLT Ordinal :=
⟨lt_wf⟩
instance : ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot Ordinal :=
WellFoundedLT.conditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot _
/-- Reformulation of well founded induction on ordinals as a lemma that works with the
`induction` tactic, as in `induction i using Ordinal.induction with | h i IH => ?_`. -/
theorem induction {p : Ordinal.{u} → Prop} (i : Ordinal.{u}) (h : ∀ j, (∀ k, k < j → p k) → p j) :
p i :=
lt_wf.induction i h
theorem typein_apply {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s]
(f : r ≼i s) (a : α) : typein s (f a) = typein r a := by
rw [← f.transPrincipal_apply _ a, (f.transPrincipal _).eq]
/-! ### Cardinality of ordinals -/
/-- The cardinal of an ordinal is the cardinality of any type on which a relation with that order
type is defined. -/
def card : Ordinal → Cardinal :=
Quotient.map WellOrder.α fun _ _ ⟨e⟩ => ⟨e.toEquiv⟩
@[simp]
theorem card_type (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : card (type r) = #α :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_typein {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] (x : α) :
#{ y // r y x } = (typein r x).card :=
rfl
theorem card_le_card {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal} : o₁ ≤ o₂ → card o₁ ≤ card o₂ :=
inductionOn o₁ fun _ _ _ => inductionOn o₂ fun _ _ _ ⟨⟨⟨f, _⟩, _⟩⟩ => ⟨f⟩
@[simp]
theorem card_zero : card 0 = 0 := mk_eq_zero _
@[simp]
theorem card_one : card 1 = 1 := mk_eq_one _
/-! ### Lifting ordinals to a higher universe -/
-- Porting note: Needed to add universe hint .{u} below
/-- The universe lift operation for ordinals, which embeds `Ordinal.{u}` as
a proper initial segment of `Ordinal.{v}` for `v > u`. For the initial segment version,
see `liftInitialSeg`. -/
@[pp_with_univ]
def lift (o : Ordinal.{v}) : Ordinal.{max v u} :=
Quotient.liftOn o (fun w => type <| ULift.down.{u} ⁻¹'o w.r) fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ =>
Quot.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans <| f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem type_uLift (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] :
type (ULift.down ⁻¹'o r) = lift.{v} (type r) :=
rfl
theorem _root_.RelIso.ordinal_lift_type_eq {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≃r s) : lift.{v} (type r) = lift.{u} (type s) :=
((RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans <|
f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).symm).ordinal_type_eq
@[simp]
theorem type_preimage {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (f : β ≃ α) :
type (f ⁻¹'o r) = type r :=
(RelIso.preimage f r).ordinal_type_eq
@[simp]
theorem type_lift_preimage (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r]
(f : β ≃ α) : lift.{u} (type (f ⁻¹'o r)) = lift.{v} (type r) :=
(RelIso.preimage f r).ordinal_lift_type_eq
/-- `lift.{max u v, u}` equals `lift.{v, u}`.
Unfortunately, the simp lemma doesn't seem to work. -/
theorem lift_umax : lift.{max u v, u} = lift.{v, u} :=
funext fun a =>
inductionOn a fun _ r _ =>
Quotient.sound ⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).symm⟩
/-- An ordinal lifted to a lower or equal universe equals itself.
Unfortunately, the simp lemma doesn't work. -/
theorem lift_id' (a : Ordinal) : lift a = a :=
inductionOn a fun _ r _ => Quotient.sound ⟨RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r⟩
/-- An ordinal lifted to the same universe equals itself. -/
@[simp]
theorem lift_id : ∀ a, lift.{u, u} a = a :=
lift_id'.{u, u}
/-- An ordinal lifted to the zero universe equals itself. -/
@[simp]
theorem lift_uzero (a : Ordinal.{u}) : lift.{0} a = a :=
lift_id' a
theorem lift_type_le {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] :
lift.{max v w} (type r) ≤ lift.{max u w} (type s) ↔ Nonempty (r ≼i s) := by
constructor <;> refine fun ⟨f⟩ ↦ ⟨?_⟩
· exact (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).symm.toInitialSeg.trans
(f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).toInitialSeg)
· exact (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).toInitialSeg.trans
(f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).symm.toInitialSeg)
theorem lift_type_eq {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] :
lift.{max v w} (type r) = lift.{max u w} (type s) ↔ Nonempty (r ≃r s) := by
refine Quotient.eq'.trans ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> refine fun ⟨f⟩ ↦ ⟨?_⟩
· exact (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).symm.trans <| f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s)
· exact (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans <| f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).symm
theorem lift_type_lt {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] :
lift.{max v w} (type r) < lift.{max u w} (type s) ↔ Nonempty (r ≺i s) := by
constructor <;> refine fun ⟨f⟩ ↦ ⟨?_⟩
· exact (f.relIsoTrans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).symm).transInitial
(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).toInitialSeg
· exact (f.relIsoTrans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r)).transInitial
(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).symm.toInitialSeg
@[simp]
theorem lift_le {a b : Ordinal} : lift.{u, v} a ≤ lift.{u, v} b ↔ a ≤ b :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun α r _ β s _ => by
rw [← lift_umax]
exact lift_type_le.{_,_,u}
@[simp]
theorem lift_inj {a b : Ordinal} : lift.{u, v} a = lift.{u, v} b ↔ a = b := by
simp_rw [le_antisymm_iff, lift_le]
@[simp]
theorem lift_lt {a b : Ordinal} : lift.{u, v} a < lift.{u, v} b ↔ a < b := by
simp_rw [lt_iff_le_not_le, lift_le]
@[simp]
theorem lift_typein_top {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≺i s) : lift.{u} (typein s f.top) = lift (type r) :=
f.subrelIso.ordinal_lift_type_eq
/-- Initial segment version of the lift operation on ordinals, embedding `Ordinal.{u}` in
`Ordinal.{v}` as an initial segment when `u ≤ v`. -/
def liftInitialSeg : Ordinal.{v} ≤i Ordinal.{max u v} := by
refine ⟨RelEmbedding.ofMonotone lift.{u} (by simp),
fun a b ↦ Ordinal.inductionOn₂ a b fun α r _ β s _ h ↦ ?_⟩
rw [RelEmbedding.ofMonotone_coe, ← lift_id'.{max u v} (type s),
← lift_umax.{v, u}, lift_type_lt] at h
obtain ⟨f⟩ := h
use typein r f.top
rw [RelEmbedding.ofMonotone_coe, ← lift_umax, lift_typein_top, lift_id']
@[simp]
theorem liftInitialSeg_coe : (liftInitialSeg.{v, u} : Ordinal → Ordinal) = lift.{v, u} :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_lift (a : Ordinal.{u}) : lift.{w} (lift.{v} a) = lift.{max v w} a :=
(liftInitialSeg.trans liftInitialSeg).eq liftInitialSeg a
@[simp]
theorem lift_zero : lift 0 = 0 :=
type_eq_zero_of_empty _
@[simp]
theorem lift_one : lift 1 = 1 :=
type_eq_one_of_unique _
@[simp]
theorem lift_card (a) : Cardinal.lift.{u, v} (card a) = card (lift.{u} a) :=
inductionOn a fun _ _ _ => rfl
theorem mem_range_lift_of_le {a : Ordinal.{u}} {b : Ordinal.{max u v}} (h : b ≤ lift.{v} a) :
b ∈ Set.range lift.{v} :=
liftInitialSeg.mem_range_of_le h
theorem le_lift_iff {a : Ordinal.{u}} {b : Ordinal.{max u v}} :
b ≤ lift.{v} a ↔ ∃ a' ≤ a, lift.{v} a' = b :=
liftInitialSeg.le_apply_iff
theorem lt_lift_iff {a : Ordinal.{u}} {b : Ordinal.{max u v}} :
b < lift.{v} a ↔ ∃ a' < a, lift.{v} a' = b :=
liftInitialSeg.lt_apply_iff
/-! ### The first infinite ordinal ω -/
/-- `ω` is the first infinite ordinal, defined as the order type of `ℕ`. -/
def omega0 : Ordinal.{u} :=
lift (typeLT ℕ)
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "ω" => Ordinal.omega0
/-- Note that the presence of this lemma makes `simp [omega0]` form a loop. -/
@[simp]
theorem type_nat_lt : typeLT ℕ = ω :=
(lift_id _).symm
@[simp]
theorem card_omega0 : card ω = ℵ₀ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_omega0 : lift ω = ω :=
lift_lift _
/-!
### Definition and first properties of addition on ordinals
In this paragraph, we introduce the addition on ordinals, and prove just enough properties to
deduce that the order on ordinals is total (and therefore well-founded). Further properties of
the addition, together with properties of the other operations, are proved in
`Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean`.
-/
/-- `o₁ + o₂` is the order on the disjoint union of `o₁` and `o₂` obtained by declaring that
every element of `o₁` is smaller than every element of `o₂`. -/
instance add : Add Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun o₁ o₂ => Quotient.liftOn₂ o₁ o₂ (fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ => type (Sum.Lex r s))
fun _ _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ => (RelIso.sumLexCongr f g).ordinal_type_eq⟩
instance addMonoidWithOne : AddMonoidWithOne Ordinal.{u} where
add := (· + ·)
zero := 0
one := 1
zero_add o :=
inductionOn o fun α _ _ =>
Eq.symm <| Quotient.sound ⟨⟨(emptySum PEmpty α).symm, Sum.lex_inr_inr⟩⟩
add_zero o :=
inductionOn o fun α _ _ =>
Eq.symm <| Quotient.sound ⟨⟨(sumEmpty α PEmpty).symm, Sum.lex_inl_inl⟩⟩
add_assoc o₁ o₂ o₃ :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ o₁ o₂ o₃ fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Quot.sound
⟨⟨sumAssoc _ _ _, by
intros a b
rcases a with (⟨a | a⟩ | a) <;> rcases b with (⟨b | b⟩ | b) <;>
simp only [sumAssoc_apply_inl_inl, sumAssoc_apply_inl_inr, sumAssoc_apply_inr,
Sum.lex_inl_inl, Sum.lex_inr_inr, Sum.Lex.sep, Sum.lex_inr_inl]⟩⟩
nsmul := nsmulRec
@[simp]
theorem card_add (o₁ o₂ : Ordinal) : card (o₁ + o₂) = card o₁ + card o₂ :=
inductionOn o₁ fun _ __ => inductionOn o₂ fun _ _ _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem type_sum_lex {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type (Sum.Lex r s) = type r + type s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_nat (n : ℕ) : card.{u} n = n := by
induction n <;> [simp; simp only [card_add, card_one, Nat.cast_succ, *]]
@[simp]
theorem card_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
card.{u} ofNat(n) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
card_nat n
instance instAddLeftMono : AddLeftMono Ordinal.{u} where
elim c a b := by
refine inductionOn₃ a b c fun α r _ β s _ γ t _ ⟨f⟩ ↦
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (Sum.recOn · Sum.inl (Sum.inr ∘ f)) ?_).ordinal_type_le
simp [f.map_rel_iff]
instance instAddRightMono : AddRightMono Ordinal.{u} where
elim c a b := by
refine inductionOn₃ a b c fun α r _ β s _ γ t _ ⟨f⟩ ↦
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (Sum.recOn · (Sum.inl ∘ f) Sum.inr) ?_).ordinal_type_le
simp [f.map_rel_iff]
theorem le_add_right (a b : Ordinal) : a ≤ a + b := by
simpa only [add_zero] using add_le_add_left (Ordinal.zero_le b) a
theorem le_add_left (a b : Ordinal) : a ≤ b + a := by
simpa only [zero_add] using add_le_add_right (Ordinal.zero_le b) a
theorem max_zero_left : ∀ a : Ordinal, max 0 a = a :=
max_bot_left
theorem max_zero_right : ∀ a : Ordinal, max a 0 = a :=
max_bot_right
@[simp]
theorem max_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} : max a b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
max_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem sInf_empty : sInf (∅ : Set Ordinal) = 0 :=
dif_neg Set.not_nonempty_empty
/-! ### Successor order properties -/
private theorem succ_le_iff' {a b : Ordinal} : a + 1 ≤ b ↔ a < b := by
refine inductionOn₂ a b fun α r _ β s _ ↦ ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> rintro ⟨f⟩
· refine ⟨((InitialSeg.leAdd _ _).trans f).toPrincipalSeg fun h ↦ ?_⟩
simpa using h (f (Sum.inr PUnit.unit))
· apply (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (Sum.recOn · f fun _ ↦ f.top) ?_).ordinal_type_le
simpa [f.map_rel_iff] using f.lt_top
instance : NoMaxOrder Ordinal :=
⟨fun _ => ⟨_, succ_le_iff'.1 le_rfl⟩⟩
instance : SuccOrder Ordinal.{u} :=
SuccOrder.ofSuccLeIff (fun o => o + 1) succ_le_iff'
instance : SuccAddOrder Ordinal := ⟨fun _ => rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_one_eq_succ (o : Ordinal) : o + 1 = succ o :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem succ_zero : succ (0 : Ordinal) = 1 :=
zero_add 1
-- Porting note: Proof used to be rfl
@[simp]
theorem succ_one : succ (1 : Ordinal) = 2 := by congr; simp only [Nat.unaryCast, zero_add]
theorem add_succ (o₁ o₂ : Ordinal) : o₁ + succ o₂ = succ (o₁ + o₂) :=
(add_assoc _ _ _).symm
theorem one_le_iff_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} : 1 ≤ o ↔ o ≠ 0 := by
rw [Order.one_le_iff_pos, Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero]
theorem succ_pos (o : Ordinal) : 0 < succ o :=
bot_lt_succ o
theorem succ_ne_zero (o : Ordinal) : succ o ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt <| succ_pos o
@[simp]
theorem lt_one_iff_zero {a : Ordinal} : a < 1 ↔ a = 0 := by
simpa using @lt_succ_bot_iff _ _ _ a _ _
theorem le_one_iff {a : Ordinal} : a ≤ 1 ↔ a = 0 ∨ a = 1 := by
simpa using @le_succ_bot_iff _ _ _ a _
@[simp]
theorem card_succ (o : Ordinal) : card (succ o) = card o + 1 := by
simp only [← add_one_eq_succ, card_add, card_one]
theorem natCast_succ (n : ℕ) : ↑n.succ = succ (n : Ordinal) :=
rfl
instance uniqueIioOne : Unique (Iio (1 : Ordinal)) where
default := ⟨0, zero_lt_one' Ordinal⟩
uniq a := Subtype.ext <| lt_one_iff_zero.1 a.2
@[simp]
theorem Iio_one_default_eq : (default : Iio (1 : Ordinal)) = ⟨0, zero_lt_one' Ordinal⟩ :=
rfl
instance uniqueToTypeOne : Unique (toType 1) where
default := enum (α := toType 1) (· < ·) ⟨0, by simp⟩
uniq a := by
rw [← enum_typein (α := toType 1) (· < ·) a]
congr
rw [← lt_one_iff_zero]
apply typein_lt_self
theorem one_toType_eq (x : toType 1) : x = enum (· < ·) ⟨0, by simp⟩ :=
Unique.eq_default x
/-! ### Extra properties of typein and enum -/
-- TODO: use `enumIsoToType` for lemmas on `toType` rather than `enum` and `typein`.
@[simp]
theorem typein_one_toType (x : toType 1) : typein (α := toType 1) (· < ·) x = 0 := by
rw [one_toType_eq x, typein_enum]
theorem typein_le_typein' (o : Ordinal) {x y : o.toType} :
typein (α := o.toType) (· < ·) x ≤ typein (α := o.toType) (· < ·) y ↔ x ≤ y := by
simp
theorem le_enum_succ {o : Ordinal} (a : (succ o).toType) :
a ≤ enum (α := (succ o).toType) (· < ·) ⟨o, (type_toType _ ▸ lt_succ o)⟩ := by
rw [← enum_typein (α := (succ o).toType) (· < ·) a, enum_le_enum', Subtype.mk_le_mk,
← lt_succ_iff]
apply typein_lt_self
/-! ### Universal ordinal -/
-- intended to be used with explicit universe parameters
/-- `univ.{u v}` is the order type of the ordinals of `Type u` as a member
of `Ordinal.{v}` (when `u < v`). It is an inaccessible cardinal. -/
@[pp_with_univ, nolint checkUnivs]
def univ : Ordinal.{max (u + 1) v} :=
lift.{v, u + 1} (typeLT Ordinal)
theorem univ_id : univ.{u, u + 1} = typeLT Ordinal :=
lift_id _
@[simp]
theorem lift_univ : lift.{w} univ.{u, v} = univ.{u, max v w} :=
lift_lift _
theorem univ_umax : univ.{u, max (u + 1) v} = univ.{u, v} :=
congr_fun lift_umax _
/-- Principal segment version of the lift operation on ordinals, embedding `Ordinal.{u}` in
`Ordinal.{v}` as a principal segment when `u < v`. -/
def liftPrincipalSeg : Ordinal.{u} <i Ordinal.{max (u + 1) v} :=
⟨↑liftInitialSeg.{max (u + 1) v, u}, univ.{u, v}, by
refine fun b => inductionOn b ?_; intro β s _
rw [univ, ← lift_umax]; constructor <;> intro h
· obtain ⟨a, e⟩ := h
rw [← e]
refine inductionOn a ?_
intro α r _
exact lift_type_lt.{u, u + 1, max (u + 1) v}.2 ⟨typein r⟩
· rw [← lift_id (type s)] at h ⊢
obtain ⟨f⟩ := lift_type_lt.{_,_,v}.1 h
obtain ⟨f, a, hf⟩ := f
exists a
revert hf
-- Porting note: apply inductionOn does not work, refine does
refine inductionOn a ?_
intro α r _ hf
refine lift_type_eq.{u, max (u + 1) v, max (u + 1) v}.2
⟨(RelIso.ofSurjective (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone ?_ ?_) ?_).symm⟩
· exact fun b => enum r ⟨f b, (hf _).1 ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩
· refine fun a b h => (typein_lt_typein r).1 ?_
rw [typein_enum, typein_enum]
exact f.map_rel_iff.2 h
· intro a'
obtain ⟨b, e⟩ := (hf _).2 (typein_lt_type _ a')
exists b
simp only [RelEmbedding.ofMonotone_coe]
simp [e]⟩
@[simp]
theorem liftPrincipalSeg_coe :
(liftPrincipalSeg.{u, v} : Ordinal → Ordinal) = lift.{max (u + 1) v} :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem liftPrincipalSeg_top : (liftPrincipalSeg.{u, v}).top = univ.{u, v} :=
rfl
theorem liftPrincipalSeg_top' : liftPrincipalSeg.{u, u + 1}.top = typeLT Ordinal := by
simp only [liftPrincipalSeg_top, univ_id]
end Ordinal
/-! ### Representing a cardinal with an ordinal -/
namespace Cardinal
open Ordinal
@[simp]
theorem mk_toType (o : Ordinal) : #o.toType = o.card :=
(Ordinal.card_type _).symm.trans <| by rw [Ordinal.type_toType]
/-- The ordinal corresponding to a cardinal `c` is the least ordinal
whose cardinal is `c`. For the order-embedding version, see `ord.order_embedding`. -/
def ord (c : Cardinal) : Ordinal :=
let F := fun α : Type u => ⨅ r : { r // IsWellOrder α r }, @type α r.1 r.2
Quot.liftOn c F
(by
suffices ∀ {α β}, α ≈ β → F α ≤ F β from
fun α β h => (this h).antisymm (this (Setoid.symm h))
rintro α β ⟨f⟩
refine le_ciInf_iff'.2 fun i => ?_
haveI := @RelEmbedding.isWellOrder _ _ (f ⁻¹'o i.1) _ (↑(RelIso.preimage f i.1)) i.2
exact
(ciInf_le' _
(Subtype.mk (f ⁻¹'o i.val)
(@RelEmbedding.isWellOrder _ _ _ _ (↑(RelIso.preimage f i.1)) i.2))).trans_eq
(Quot.sound ⟨RelIso.preimage f i.1⟩))
theorem ord_eq_Inf (α : Type u) : ord #α = ⨅ r : { r // IsWellOrder α r }, @type α r.1 r.2 :=
rfl
theorem ord_eq (α) : ∃ (r : α → α → Prop) (wo : IsWellOrder α r), ord #α = @type α r wo :=
let ⟨r, wo⟩ := ciInf_mem fun r : { r // IsWellOrder α r } => @type α r.1 r.2
⟨r.1, r.2, wo.symm⟩
theorem ord_le_type (r : α → α → Prop) [h : IsWellOrder α r] : ord #α ≤ type r :=
ciInf_le' _ (Subtype.mk r h)
theorem ord_le {c o} : ord c ≤ o ↔ c ≤ o.card :=
inductionOn c fun α =>
Ordinal.inductionOn o fun β s _ => by
let ⟨r, _, e⟩ := ord_eq α
simp only [card_type]; constructor <;> intro h
· rw [e] at h
exact
let ⟨f⟩ := h
⟨f.toEmbedding⟩
· obtain ⟨f⟩ := h
have g := RelEmbedding.preimage f s
haveI := RelEmbedding.isWellOrder g
exact le_trans (ord_le_type _) g.ordinal_type_le
theorem gc_ord_card : GaloisConnection ord card := fun _ _ => ord_le
theorem lt_ord {c o} : o < ord c ↔ o.card < c :=
gc_ord_card.lt_iff_lt
@[simp]
theorem card_ord (c) : (ord c).card = c :=
c.inductionOn fun α ↦ let ⟨r, _, e⟩ := ord_eq α; e ▸ card_type r
theorem card_surjective : Function.Surjective card :=
fun c ↦ ⟨_, card_ord c⟩
/-- Galois coinsertion between `Cardinal.ord` and `Ordinal.card`. -/
def gciOrdCard : GaloisCoinsertion ord card :=
gc_ord_card.toGaloisCoinsertion fun c => c.card_ord.le
theorem ord_card_le (o : Ordinal) : o.card.ord ≤ o :=
gc_ord_card.l_u_le _
theorem lt_ord_succ_card (o : Ordinal) : o < (succ o.card).ord :=
lt_ord.2 <| lt_succ _
theorem card_le_iff {o : Ordinal} {c : Cardinal} : o.card ≤ c ↔ o < (succ c).ord := by
rw [lt_ord, lt_succ_iff]
/--
A variation on `Cardinal.lt_ord` using `≤`: If `o` is no greater than the
initial ordinal of cardinality `c`, then its cardinal is no greater than `c`.
The converse, however, is false (for instance, `o = ω+1` and `c = ℵ₀`).
-/
lemma card_le_of_le_ord {o : Ordinal} {c : Cardinal} (ho : o ≤ c.ord) :
o.card ≤ c := by
rw [← card_ord c]; exact Ordinal.card_le_card ho
@[mono]
theorem ord_strictMono : StrictMono ord :=
gciOrdCard.strictMono_l
@[mono]
| theorem ord_mono : Monotone ord :=
gc_ord_card.monotone_l
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Basic.lean | 1,087 | 1,088 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Dagur Asgeirsson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Dagur Asgeirsson
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.CompHausLike.Limits
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.LightProfinite.Basic
/-!
# Explicit limits and colimits
This file applies the general API for explicit limits and colimits in `CompHausLike P` (see
the file `Mathlib.Topology.Category.CompHausLike.Limits`) to the special case of `LightProfinite`.
-/
namespace LightProfinite
universe u w
open CategoryTheory Limits CompHausLike
instance : HasExplicitPullbacks
(fun Y ↦ TotallyDisconnectedSpace Y ∧ SecondCountableTopology Y) where
hasProp _ _ := {
hasProp := ⟨show TotallyDisconnectedSpace {_xy : _ | _} from inferInstance,
show SecondCountableTopology {_xy : _ | _} from inferInstance⟩ }
instance : HasExplicitFiniteCoproducts.{w, u}
(fun Y ↦ TotallyDisconnectedSpace Y ∧ SecondCountableTopology Y) where
hasProp _ := { hasProp :=
⟨show TotallyDisconnectedSpace (Σ (_a : _), _) from inferInstance,
show SecondCountableTopology (Σ (_a : _), _) from inferInstance⟩ }
/-- A one-element space is terminal in `Profinite` -/
abbrev isTerminalPUnit : IsTerminal (LightProfinite.of PUnit.{u + 1}) :=
CompHausLike.isTerminalPUnit
example : FinitaryExtensive LightProfinite.{u} := inferInstance
noncomputable example : PreservesFiniteCoproducts lightProfiniteToCompHaus.{u} := inferInstance
end LightProfinite
| Mathlib/Topology/Category/LightProfinite/Limits.lean | 213 | 215 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Kyle Miller. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kyle Miller
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Parity
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Path
/-!
# Trails and Eulerian trails
This module contains additional theory about trails, including Eulerian trails (also known
as Eulerian circuits).
## Main definitions
* `SimpleGraph.Walk.IsEulerian` is the predicate that a trail is an Eulerian trail.
* `SimpleGraph.Walk.IsTrail.even_countP_edges_iff` gives a condition on the number of edges
in a trail that can be incident to a given vertex.
* `SimpleGraph.Walk.IsEulerian.even_degree_iff` gives a condition on the degrees of vertices
when there exists an Eulerian trail.
* `SimpleGraph.Walk.IsEulerian.card_odd_degree` gives the possible numbers of odd-degree
vertices when there exists an Eulerian trail.
## TODO
* Prove that there exists an Eulerian trail when the conclusion to
`SimpleGraph.Walk.IsEulerian.card_odd_degree` holds.
## Tags
Eulerian trails
-/
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V : Type*} {G : SimpleGraph V}
namespace Walk
/-- The edges of a trail as a finset, since each edge in a trail appears exactly once. -/
abbrev IsTrail.edgesFinset {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (h : p.IsTrail) : Finset (Sym2 V) :=
⟨p.edges, h.edges_nodup⟩
variable [DecidableEq V]
theorem IsTrail.even_countP_edges_iff {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (ht : p.IsTrail) (x : V) :
Even (p.edges.countP fun e => x ∈ e) ↔ u ≠ v → x ≠ u ∧ x ≠ v := by
induction p with
| nil => simp
| cons huv p ih =>
rw [cons_isTrail_iff] at ht
specialize ih ht.1
simp only [List.countP_cons, Ne, edges_cons, Sym2.mem_iff]
split_ifs with h
· rw [decide_eq_true_eq] at h
obtain (rfl | rfl) := h
· rw [Nat.even_add_one, ih]
simp only [huv.ne, imp_false, Ne, not_false_iff, true_and, not_forall,
Classical.not_not, exists_prop, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, false_and,
and_iff_right_iff_imp]
rintro rfl rfl
exact G.loopless _ huv
· rw [Nat.even_add_one, ih, ← not_iff_not]
simp only [huv.ne.symm, Ne, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, false_and, not_forall,
not_false_iff, exists_prop, and_true, Classical.not_not, true_and, iff_and_self]
rintro rfl
exact huv.ne
· rw [decide_eq_true_eq, not_or] at h
simp only [h.1, h.2, not_false_iff, true_and, add_zero, Ne] at ih ⊢
rw [ih]
constructor <;>
· rintro h' h'' rfl
simp only [imp_false, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, Classical.not_not] at h'
cases h'
simp only [not_true, and_false, false_and] at h
/-- An *Eulerian trail* (also known as an "Eulerian path") is a walk
`p` that visits every edge exactly once. The lemma `SimpleGraph.Walk.IsEulerian.IsTrail` shows
that these are trails.
Combine with `p.IsCircuit` to get an Eulerian circuit (also known as an "Eulerian cycle"). -/
def IsEulerian {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : Prop :=
∀ e, e ∈ G.edgeSet → p.edges.count e = 1
theorem IsEulerian.isTrail {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (h : p.IsEulerian) : p.IsTrail := by
rw [isTrail_def, List.nodup_iff_count_le_one]
intro e
by_cases he : e ∈ p.edges
· exact (h e (edges_subset_edgeSet _ he)).le
· simp [List.count_eq_zero_of_not_mem he]
theorem IsEulerian.mem_edges_iff {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (h : p.IsEulerian) {e : Sym2 V} :
e ∈ p.edges ↔ e ∈ G.edgeSet :=
⟨ fun h => p.edges_subset_edgeSet h
, fun he => by simpa [Nat.succ_le] using (h e he).ge ⟩
/-- The edge set of an Eulerian graph is finite. -/
def IsEulerian.fintypeEdgeSet {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (h : p.IsEulerian) :
Fintype G.edgeSet :=
Fintype.ofFinset h.isTrail.edgesFinset fun e => by
simp only [Finset.mem_mk, Multiset.mem_coe, h.mem_edges_iff]
theorem IsTrail.isEulerian_of_forall_mem {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (h : p.IsTrail)
(hc : ∀ e, e ∈ G.edgeSet → e ∈ p.edges) : p.IsEulerian := fun e he =>
List.count_eq_one_of_mem h.edges_nodup (hc e he)
theorem isEulerian_iff {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) :
p.IsEulerian ↔ p.IsTrail ∧ ∀ e, e ∈ G.edgeSet → e ∈ p.edges := by
constructor
· intro h
exact ⟨h.isTrail, fun _ => h.mem_edges_iff.mpr⟩
· rintro ⟨h, hl⟩
exact h.isEulerian_of_forall_mem hl
| theorem IsEulerian.edgesFinset_eq [Fintype G.edgeSet] {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v}
(h : p.IsEulerian) : h.isTrail.edgesFinset = G.edgeFinset := by
ext e
simp [h.mem_edges_iff]
theorem IsEulerian.even_degree_iff {x u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (ht : p.IsEulerian) [Fintype V]
[DecidableRel G.Adj] : Even (G.degree x) ↔ u ≠ v → x ≠ u ∧ x ≠ v := by
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Trails.lean | 119 | 125 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Linear.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ComplexShapeSigns
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomologicalBicomplex
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Basic
/-!
# The total complex of a bicomplex
Given a preadditive category `C`, two complex shapes `c₁ : ComplexShape I₁`,
`c₂ : ComplexShape I₂`, a bicomplex `K : HomologicalComplex₂ C c₁ c₂`,
and a third complex shape `c₁₂ : ComplexShape I₁₂` equipped
with `[TotalComplexShape c₁ c₂ c₁₂]`, we construct the total complex
`K.total c₁₂ : HomologicalComplex C c₁₂`.
In particular, if `c := ComplexShape.up ℤ` and `K : HomologicalComplex₂ c c`, then for any
`n : ℤ`, `(K.total c).X n` identifies to the coproduct of the `(K.X p).X q` such that
`p + q = n`, and the differential on `(K.total c).X n` is induced by the sum of horizontal
differentials `(K.X p).X q ⟶ (K.X (p + 1)).X q` and `(-1) ^ p` times the vertical
differentials `(K.X p).X q ⟶ (K.X p).X (q + 1)`.
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
open CategoryTheory Category Limits Preadditive
namespace HomologicalComplex₂
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] [Preadditive C]
{I₁ I₂ I₁₂ : Type*} {c₁ : ComplexShape I₁} {c₂ : ComplexShape I₂}
(K L M : HomologicalComplex₂ C c₁ c₂) (φ : K ⟶ L) (e : K ≅ L) (ψ : L ⟶ M)
(c₁₂ : ComplexShape I₁₂) [TotalComplexShape c₁ c₂ c₁₂]
/-- A bicomplex has a total bicomplex if for any `i₁₂ : I₁₂`, the coproduct
of the objects `(K.X i₁).X i₂` such that `ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ = i₁₂` exists. -/
abbrev HasTotal := K.toGradedObject.HasMap (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂)
include e in
variable {K L} in
lemma hasTotal_of_iso [K.HasTotal c₁₂] : L.HasTotal c₁₂ :=
GradedObject.hasMap_of_iso (GradedObject.isoMk K.toGradedObject L.toGradedObject
(fun ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ =>
(HomologicalComplex.eval _ _ i₁ ⋙ HomologicalComplex.eval _ _ i₂).mapIso e)) _
variable [DecidableEq I₁₂] [K.HasTotal c₁₂]
section
variable (i₁ : I₁) (i₂ : I₂) (i₁₂ : I₁₂)
/-- The horizontal differential in the total complex on a given summand. -/
noncomputable def d₁ :
(K.X i₁).X i₂ ⟶ (K.toGradedObject.mapObj (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂)) i₁₂ :=
ComplexShape.ε₁ c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ • ((K.d i₁ (c₁.next i₁)).f i₂ ≫
K.toGradedObject.ιMapObjOrZero (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂) ⟨_, i₂⟩ i₁₂)
/-- The vertical differential in the total complex on a given summand. -/
noncomputable def d₂ :
(K.X i₁).X i₂ ⟶ (K.toGradedObject.mapObj (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂)) i₁₂ :=
ComplexShape.ε₂ c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ • ((K.X i₁).d i₂ (c₂.next i₂) ≫
K.toGradedObject.ιMapObjOrZero (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂) ⟨i₁, _⟩ i₁₂)
lemma d₁_eq_zero (h : ¬ c₁.Rel i₁ (c₁.next i₁)) :
K.d₁ c₁₂ i₁ i₂ i₁₂ = 0 := by
dsimp [d₁]
rw [K.shape_f _ _ h, zero_comp, smul_zero]
lemma d₂_eq_zero (h : ¬ c₂.Rel i₂ (c₂.next i₂)) :
K.d₂ c₁₂ i₁ i₂ i₁₂ = 0 := by
dsimp [d₂]
rw [HomologicalComplex.shape _ _ _ h, zero_comp, smul_zero]
end
namespace totalAux
/-! Lemmas in the `totalAux` namespace should be used only in the internals of
the construction of the total complex `HomologicalComplex₂.total`. Once that
definition is done, similar lemmas shall be restated, but with
terms like `K.toGradedObject.ιMapObj` replaced by `K.ιTotal`. This is done in order
to prevent API leakage from definitions involving graded objects. -/
lemma d₁_eq' {i₁ i₁' : I₁} (h : c₁.Rel i₁ i₁') (i₂ : I₂) (i₁₂ : I₁₂) :
K.d₁ c₁₂ i₁ i₂ i₁₂ = ComplexShape.ε₁ c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ • ((K.d i₁ i₁').f i₂ ≫
K.toGradedObject.ιMapObjOrZero (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂) ⟨i₁', i₂⟩ i₁₂) := by
obtain rfl := c₁.next_eq' h
rfl
lemma d₁_eq {i₁ i₁' : I₁} (h : c₁.Rel i₁ i₁') (i₂ : I₂) (i₁₂ : I₁₂)
(h' : ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁', i₂⟩ = i₁₂) :
K.d₁ c₁₂ i₁ i₂ i₁₂ = ComplexShape.ε₁ c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ • ((K.d i₁ i₁').f i₂ ≫
K.toGradedObject.ιMapObj (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂) ⟨i₁', i₂⟩ i₁₂ h') := by
rw [d₁_eq' K c₁₂ h i₂ i₁₂, K.toGradedObject.ιMapObjOrZero_eq]
lemma d₂_eq' (i₁ : I₁) {i₂ i₂' : I₂} (h : c₂.Rel i₂ i₂') (i₁₂ : I₁₂) :
K.d₂ c₁₂ i₁ i₂ i₁₂ = ComplexShape.ε₂ c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ • ((K.X i₁).d i₂ i₂' ≫
K.toGradedObject.ιMapObjOrZero (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂) ⟨i₁, i₂'⟩ i₁₂) := by
obtain rfl := c₂.next_eq' h
rfl
lemma d₂_eq (i₁ : I₁) {i₂ i₂' : I₂} (h : c₂.Rel i₂ i₂') (i₁₂ : I₁₂)
(h' : ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁, i₂'⟩ = i₁₂) :
K.d₂ c₁₂ i₁ i₂ i₁₂ = ComplexShape.ε₂ c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ • ((K.X i₁).d i₂ i₂' ≫
K.toGradedObject.ιMapObj (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂) ⟨i₁, i₂'⟩ i₁₂ h') := by
rw [d₂_eq' K c₁₂ i₁ h i₁₂, K.toGradedObject.ιMapObjOrZero_eq]
end totalAux
lemma d₁_eq_zero' {i₁ i₁' : I₁} (h : c₁.Rel i₁ i₁') (i₂ : I₂) (i₁₂ : I₁₂)
(h' : ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁', i₂⟩ ≠ i₁₂) :
K.d₁ c₁₂ i₁ i₂ i₁₂ = 0 := by
rw [totalAux.d₁_eq' K c₁₂ h i₂ i₁₂, K.toGradedObject.ιMapObjOrZero_eq_zero, comp_zero, smul_zero]
exact h'
lemma d₂_eq_zero' (i₁ : I₁) {i₂ i₂' : I₂} (h : c₂.Rel i₂ i₂') (i₁₂ : I₁₂)
(h' : ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂ ⟨i₁, i₂'⟩ ≠ i₁₂) :
K.d₂ c₁₂ i₁ i₂ i₁₂ = 0 := by
rw [totalAux.d₂_eq' K c₁₂ i₁ h i₁₂, K.toGradedObject.ιMapObjOrZero_eq_zero, comp_zero, smul_zero]
exact h'
/-- The horizontal differential in the total complex. -/
noncomputable def D₁ (i₁₂ i₁₂' : I₁₂) :
K.toGradedObject.mapObj (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂) i₁₂ ⟶
K.toGradedObject.mapObj (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂) i₁₂' :=
GradedObject.descMapObj _ (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂)
(fun ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ _ => K.d₁ c₁₂ i₁ i₂ i₁₂')
/-- The vertical differential in the total complex. -/
noncomputable def D₂ (i₁₂ i₁₂' : I₁₂) :
K.toGradedObject.mapObj (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂) i₁₂ ⟶
K.toGradedObject.mapObj (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂) i₁₂' :=
GradedObject.descMapObj _ (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂)
(fun ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ _ => K.d₂ c₁₂ i₁ i₂ i₁₂')
namespace totalAux
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma ιMapObj_D₁ (i₁₂ i₁₂' : I₁₂) (i : I₁ × I₂) (h : ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂ i = i₁₂) :
K.toGradedObject.ιMapObj (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂) i i₁₂ h ≫ K.D₁ c₁₂ i₁₂ i₁₂' =
K.d₁ c₁₂ i.1 i.2 i₁₂' := by
simp [D₁]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma ιMapObj_D₂ (i₁₂ i₁₂' : I₁₂) (i : I₁ × I₂) (h : ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂ i = i₁₂) :
K.toGradedObject.ιMapObj (ComplexShape.π c₁ c₂ c₁₂) i i₁₂ h ≫ K.D₂ c₁₂ i₁₂ i₁₂' =
K.d₂ c₁₂ i.1 i.2 i₁₂' := by
simp [D₂]
end totalAux
lemma D₁_shape (i₁₂ i₁₂' : I₁₂) (h₁₂ : ¬ c₁₂.Rel i₁₂ i₁₂') : K.D₁ c₁₂ i₁₂ i₁₂' = 0 := by
ext ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ h
simp only [totalAux.ιMapObj_D₁, comp_zero]
by_cases h₁ : c₁.Rel i₁ (c₁.next i₁)
· rw [K.d₁_eq_zero' c₁₂ h₁ i₂ i₁₂']
intro h₂
exact h₁₂ (by simpa only [← h, ← h₂] using ComplexShape.rel_π₁ c₂ c₁₂ h₁ i₂)
· exact d₁_eq_zero _ _ _ _ _ h₁
lemma D₂_shape (i₁₂ i₁₂' : I₁₂) (h₁₂ : ¬ c₁₂.Rel i₁₂ i₁₂') : K.D₂ c₁₂ i₁₂ i₁₂' = 0 := by
ext ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ h
simp only [totalAux.ιMapObj_D₂, comp_zero]
by_cases h₂ : c₂.Rel i₂ (c₂.next i₂)
· rw [K.d₂_eq_zero' c₁₂ i₁ h₂ i₁₂']
intro h₁
exact h₁₂ (by simpa only [← h, ← h₁] using ComplexShape.rel_π₂ c₁ c₁₂ i₁ h₂)
· exact d₂_eq_zero _ _ _ _ _ h₂
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma D₁_D₁ (i₁₂ i₁₂' i₁₂'' : I₁₂) : K.D₁ c₁₂ i₁₂ i₁₂' ≫ K.D₁ c₁₂ i₁₂' i₁₂'' = 0 := by
by_cases h₁ : c₁₂.Rel i₁₂ i₁₂'
· by_cases h₂ : c₁₂.Rel i₁₂' i₁₂''
· ext ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ h
simp only [totalAux.ιMapObj_D₁_assoc, comp_zero]
by_cases h₃ : c₁.Rel i₁ (c₁.next i₁)
· rw [totalAux.d₁_eq K c₁₂ h₃ i₂ i₁₂']; swap
· rw [← ComplexShape.next_π₁ c₂ c₁₂ h₃ i₂, ← c₁₂.next_eq' h₁, h]
simp only [Linear.units_smul_comp, assoc, totalAux.ιMapObj_D₁]
by_cases h₄ : c₁.Rel (c₁.next i₁) (c₁.next (c₁.next i₁))
· rw [totalAux.d₁_eq K c₁₂ h₄ i₂ i₁₂'', Linear.comp_units_smul,
d_f_comp_d_f_assoc, zero_comp, smul_zero, smul_zero]
rw [← ComplexShape.next_π₁ c₂ c₁₂ h₄, ← ComplexShape.next_π₁ c₂ c₁₂ h₃,
h, c₁₂.next_eq' h₁, c₁₂.next_eq' h₂]
· rw [K.d₁_eq_zero _ _ _ _ h₄, comp_zero, smul_zero]
· rw [K.d₁_eq_zero c₁₂ _ _ _ h₃, zero_comp]
| · rw [K.D₁_shape c₁₂ _ _ h₂, comp_zero]
· rw [K.D₁_shape c₁₂ _ _ h₁, zero_comp]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma D₂_D₂ (i₁₂ i₁₂' i₁₂'' : I₁₂) : K.D₂ c₁₂ i₁₂ i₁₂' ≫ K.D₂ c₁₂ i₁₂' i₁₂'' = 0 := by
by_cases h₁ : c₁₂.Rel i₁₂ i₁₂'
· by_cases h₂ : c₁₂.Rel i₁₂' i₁₂''
· ext ⟨i₁, i₂⟩ h
simp only [totalAux.ιMapObj_D₂_assoc, comp_zero]
by_cases h₃ : c₂.Rel i₂ (c₂.next i₂)
· rw [totalAux.d₂_eq K c₁₂ i₁ h₃ i₁₂']; swap
· rw [← ComplexShape.next_π₂ c₁ c₁₂ i₁ h₃, ← c₁₂.next_eq' h₁, h]
simp only [Linear.units_smul_comp, assoc, totalAux.ιMapObj_D₂]
by_cases h₄ : c₂.Rel (c₂.next i₂) (c₂.next (c₂.next i₂))
· rw [totalAux.d₂_eq K c₁₂ i₁ h₄ i₁₂'', Linear.comp_units_smul,
HomologicalComplex.d_comp_d_assoc, zero_comp, smul_zero, smul_zero]
rw [← ComplexShape.next_π₂ c₁ c₁₂ i₁ h₄, ← ComplexShape.next_π₂ c₁ c₁₂ i₁ h₃,
h, c₁₂.next_eq' h₁, c₁₂.next_eq' h₂]
· rw [K.d₂_eq_zero c₁₂ _ _ _ h₄, comp_zero, smul_zero]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/TotalComplex.lean | 190 | 208 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Division
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Basic
/-!
# Division of `MvPolynomial` by monomials
## Main definitions
* `MvPolynomial.divMonomial x s`: divides `x` by the monomial `MvPolynomial.monomial 1 s`
* `MvPolynomial.modMonomial x s`: the remainder upon dividing `x` by the monomial
`MvPolynomial.monomial 1 s`.
## Main results
* `MvPolynomial.divMonomial_add_modMonomial`, `MvPolynomial.modMonomial_add_divMonomial`:
`divMonomial` and `modMonomial` are well-behaved as quotient and remainder operators.
## Implementation notes
Where possible, the results in this file should be first proved in the generality of
`AddMonoidAlgebra`, and then the versions specialized to `MvPolynomial` proved in terms of these.
-/
variable {σ R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
namespace MvPolynomial
section CopiedDeclarations
/-! Please ensure the declarations in this section are direct translations of `AddMonoidAlgebra`
results. -/
/-- Divide by `monomial 1 s`, discarding terms not divisible by this. -/
noncomputable def divMonomial (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) : MvPolynomial σ R :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.divOf p s
local infixl:70 " /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ " => divMonomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_divMonomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (x : MvPolynomial σ R) (s' : σ →₀ ℕ) :
coeff s' (x /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ s) = coeff (s + s') x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem support_divMonomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (x : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(x /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ s).support = x.support.preimage _ (add_right_injective s).injOn :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_divMonomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) : (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ s = 0 :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.zero_divOf _
theorem divMonomial_zero (x : MvPolynomial σ R) : x /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ 0 = x :=
x.divOf_zero
theorem add_divMonomial (x y : MvPolynomial σ R) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) :
(x + y) /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ s = x /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ s + y /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ s :=
map_add (N := _ →₀ _) _ _ _
theorem divMonomial_add (a b : σ →₀ ℕ) (x : MvPolynomial σ R) :
x /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ (a + b) = x /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ a /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ b :=
x.divOf_add _ _
@[simp]
theorem divMonomial_monomial_mul (a : σ →₀ ℕ) (x : MvPolynomial σ R) :
monomial a 1 * x /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ a = x :=
x.of'_mul_divOf _
@[simp]
theorem divMonomial_mul_monomial (a : σ →₀ ℕ) (x : MvPolynomial σ R) :
x * monomial a 1 /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ a = x :=
x.mul_of'_divOf _
@[simp]
theorem divMonomial_monomial (a : σ →₀ ℕ) : monomial a 1 /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ a = (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.of'_divOf _
/-- The remainder upon division by `monomial 1 s`. -/
noncomputable def modMonomial (x : MvPolynomial σ R) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) : MvPolynomial σ R :=
x.modOf s
local infixl:70 " %ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ " => modMonomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_modMonomial_of_not_le {s' s : σ →₀ ℕ} (x : MvPolynomial σ R) (h : ¬s ≤ s') :
coeff s' (x %ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ s) = coeff s' x :=
x.modOf_apply_of_not_exists_add s s'
(by
rintro ⟨d, rfl⟩
exact h le_self_add)
@[simp]
theorem coeff_modMonomial_of_le {s' s : σ →₀ ℕ} (x : MvPolynomial σ R) (h : s ≤ s') :
coeff s' (x %ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ s) = 0 :=
x.modOf_apply_of_exists_add _ _ <| exists_add_of_le h
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_modMonomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (x : MvPolynomial σ R) :
monomial s 1 * x %ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ s = 0 :=
x.of'_mul_modOf _
@[simp]
theorem mul_monomial_modMonomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (x : MvPolynomial σ R) :
x * monomial s 1 %ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ s = 0 :=
x.mul_of'_modOf _
@[simp]
theorem monomial_modMonomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) : monomial s (1 : R) %ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ s = 0 :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.of'_modOf _
theorem divMonomial_add_modMonomial (x : MvPolynomial σ R) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) :
monomial s 1 * (x /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ s) + x %ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ s = x :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.divOf_add_modOf x s
theorem modMonomial_add_divMonomial (x : MvPolynomial σ R) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) :
x %ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ s + monomial s 1 * (x /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ s) = x :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.modOf_add_divOf x s
theorem monomial_one_dvd_iff_modMonomial_eq_zero {i : σ →₀ ℕ} {x : MvPolynomial σ R} :
monomial i (1 : R) ∣ x ↔ x %ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ i = 0 :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.of'_dvd_iff_modOf_eq_zero
end CopiedDeclarations
section XLemmas
local infixl:70 " /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ " => divMonomial
local infixl:70 " %ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ " => modMonomial
@[simp]
theorem X_mul_divMonomial (i : σ) (x : MvPolynomial σ R) :
X i * x /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ Finsupp.single i 1 = x :=
divMonomial_monomial_mul _ _
@[simp]
theorem X_divMonomial (i : σ) : (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ Finsupp.single i 1 = 1 :=
divMonomial_monomial (Finsupp.single i 1)
@[simp]
theorem mul_X_divMonomial (x : MvPolynomial σ R) (i : σ) :
x * X i /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ Finsupp.single i 1 = x :=
divMonomial_mul_monomial _ _
@[simp]
theorem X_mul_modMonomial (i : σ) (x : MvPolynomial σ R) :
X i * x %ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ Finsupp.single i 1 = 0 :=
monomial_mul_modMonomial _ _
@[simp]
theorem mul_X_modMonomial (x : MvPolynomial σ R) (i : σ) :
x * X i %ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ Finsupp.single i 1 = 0 :=
mul_monomial_modMonomial _ _
@[simp]
theorem modMonomial_X (i : σ) : (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) %ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ Finsupp.single i 1 = 0 :=
monomial_modMonomial _
theorem divMonomial_add_modMonomial_single (x : MvPolynomial σ R) (i : σ) :
X i * (x /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ Finsupp.single i 1) + x %ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ Finsupp.single i 1 = x :=
divMonomial_add_modMonomial _ _
theorem modMonomial_add_divMonomial_single (x : MvPolynomial σ R) (i : σ) :
x %ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ Finsupp.single i 1 + X i * (x /ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ Finsupp.single i 1) = x :=
modMonomial_add_divMonomial _ _
theorem X_dvd_iff_modMonomial_eq_zero {i : σ} {x : MvPolynomial σ R} :
X i ∣ x ↔ x %ᵐᵒⁿᵒᵐⁱᵃˡ Finsupp.single i 1 = 0 :=
monomial_one_dvd_iff_modMonomial_eq_zero
end XLemmas
/-! ### Some results about dvd (`∣`) on `monomial` and `X` -/
theorem monomial_dvd_monomial {r s : R} {i j : σ →₀ ℕ} :
monomial i r ∣ monomial j s ↔ (s = 0 ∨ i ≤ j) ∧ r ∣ s := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
rw [MvPolynomial.ext_iff] at hx
have hj := hx j
have hi := hx i
classical
simp_rw [coeff_monomial, if_pos] at hj hi
simp_rw [coeff_monomial_mul'] at hi hj
split_ifs at hi hj with hi hi
· exact ⟨Or.inr hi, _, hj⟩
· exact ⟨Or.inl hj, hj.symm ▸ dvd_zero _⟩
-- Porting note: two goals remain at this point in Lean 4
· simp_all only [or_true, dvd_mul_right, and_self]
· simp_all only [ite_self, le_refl, ite_true, dvd_mul_right, or_false, and_self]
· rintro ⟨h | hij, d, rfl⟩
· simp_rw [h, monomial_zero, dvd_zero]
· refine ⟨monomial (j - i) d, ?_⟩
rw [monomial_mul, add_tsub_cancel_of_le hij]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_one_dvd_monomial_one [Nontrivial R] {i j : σ →₀ ℕ} :
monomial i (1 : R) ∣ monomial j 1 ↔ i ≤ j := by
rw [monomial_dvd_monomial]
simp_rw [one_ne_zero, false_or, dvd_rfl, and_true]
@[simp]
theorem X_dvd_X [Nontrivial R] {i j : σ} :
(X i : MvPolynomial σ R) ∣ (X j : MvPolynomial σ R) ↔ i = j := by
refine monomial_one_dvd_monomial_one.trans ?_
simp_rw [Finsupp.single_le_iff, Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero, Finsupp.single_apply_ne_zero,
ne_eq, reduceCtorEq,not_false_eq_true, and_true]
@[simp]
theorem X_dvd_monomial {i : σ} {j : σ →₀ ℕ} {r : R} :
(X i : MvPolynomial σ R) ∣ monomial j r ↔ r = 0 ∨ j i ≠ 0 := by
refine monomial_dvd_monomial.trans ?_
simp_rw [one_dvd, and_true, Finsupp.single_le_iff, Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
end MvPolynomial
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Division.lean | 251 | 255 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Jz Pan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jz Pan
-/
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.SplittingField.Construction
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.IsAlgClosed.AlgebraicClosure
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Separable
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Normal.Closure
import Mathlib.RingTheory.AlgebraicIndependent.Adjoin
import Mathlib.RingTheory.AlgebraicIndependent.TranscendenceBasis
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.SeparableDegree
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.UniqueFactorization
/-!
# Separable degree
This file contains basics about the separable degree of a field extension.
## Main definitions
- `Field.Emb F E`: the type of `F`-algebra homomorphisms from `E` to the algebraic closure of `E`
(the algebraic closure of `F` is usually used in the literature, but our definition has the
advantage that `Field.Emb F E` lies in the same universe as `E` rather than the maximum over `F`
and `E`). Usually denoted by $\operatorname{Emb}_F(E)$ in textbooks.
- `Field.finSepDegree F E`: the (finite) separable degree $[E:F]_s$ of an extension `E / F`
of fields, defined to be the number of `F`-algebra homomorphisms from `E` to the algebraic
closure of `E`, as a natural number. It is zero if `Field.Emb F E` is not finite.
Note that if `E / F` is not algebraic, then this definition makes no mathematical sense.
**Remark:** the `Cardinal`-valued, potentially infinite separable degree `Field.sepDegree F E`
for a general algebraic extension `E / F` is defined to be the degree of `L / F`, where `L` is
the separable closure of `F` in `E`, which is not defined in this file yet. Later we
will show that (`Field.finSepDegree_eq`), if `Field.Emb F E` is finite, then these two
definitions coincide. If `E / F` is algebraic with infinite separable degree, we have
`#(Field.Emb F E) = 2 ^ Field.sepDegree F E` instead.
(See `Field.Emb.cardinal_eq_two_pow_sepDegree` in another file.) For example, if
$F = \mathbb{Q}$ and $E = \mathbb{Q}( \mu_{p^\infty} )$, then $\operatorname{Emb}_F (E)$
is in bijection with $\operatorname{Gal}(E/F)$, which is isomorphic to
$\mathbb{Z}_p^\times$, which is uncountable, whereas $ [E:F] $ is countable.
- `Polynomial.natSepDegree`: the separable degree of a polynomial is a natural number,
defined to be the number of distinct roots of it over its splitting field.
## Main results
- `Field.embEquivOfEquiv`, `Field.finSepDegree_eq_of_equiv`:
a random bijection between `Field.Emb F E` and `Field.Emb F K` when `E` and `K` are isomorphic
as `F`-algebras. In particular, they have the same cardinality (so their
`Field.finSepDegree` are equal).
- `Field.embEquivOfAdjoinSplits`,
`Field.finSepDegree_eq_of_adjoin_splits`: a random bijection between `Field.Emb F E` and
`E →ₐ[F] K` if `E = F(S)` such that every element `s` of `S` is integral (= algebraic) over `F`
and whose minimal polynomial splits in `K`. In particular, they have the same cardinality.
- `Field.embEquivOfIsAlgClosed`,
`Field.finSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed`: a random bijection between `Field.Emb F E` and
`E →ₐ[F] K` when `E / F` is algebraic and `K / F` is algebraically closed.
In particular, they have the same cardinality.
- `Field.embProdEmbOfIsAlgebraic`, `Field.finSepDegree_mul_finSepDegree_of_isAlgebraic`:
if `K / E / F` is a field extension tower, such that `K / E` is algebraic,
then there is a non-canonical bijection `Field.Emb F E × Field.Emb E K ≃ Field.Emb F K`.
In particular, the separable degrees satisfy the tower law: $[E:F]_s [K:E]_s = [K:F]_s$
(see also `Module.finrank_mul_finrank`).
- `Field.infinite_emb_of_transcendental`: `Field.Emb` is infinite for transcendental extensions.
- `Polynomial.natSepDegree_le_natDegree`: the separable degree of a polynomial is smaller than
its degree.
- `Polynomial.natSepDegree_eq_natDegree_iff`: the separable degree of a non-zero polynomial is
equal to its degree if and only if it is separable.
- `Polynomial.natSepDegree_eq_of_splits`: if a polynomial splits over `E`, then its separable degree
is equal to the number of distinct roots of it over `E`.
- `Polynomial.natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed`: the separable degree of a polynomial is equal to
the number of distinct roots of it over any algebraically closed field.
- `Polynomial.natSepDegree_expand`: if a field `F` is of exponential characteristic
`q`, then `Polynomial.expand F (q ^ n) f` and `f` have the same separable degree.
- `Polynomial.HasSeparableContraction.natSepDegree_eq`: if a polynomial has separable
contraction, then its separable degree is equal to its separable contraction degree.
- `Irreducible.natSepDegree_dvd_natDegree`: the separable degree of an irreducible
polynomial divides its degree.
- `IntermediateField.finSepDegree_adjoin_simple_eq_natSepDegree`: the separable degree of
`F⟮α⟯ / F` is equal to the separable degree of the minimal polynomial of `α` over `F`.
- `IntermediateField.finSepDegree_adjoin_simple_eq_finrank_iff`: if `α` is algebraic over `F`, then
the separable degree of `F⟮α⟯ / F` is equal to the degree of `F⟮α⟯ / F` if and only if `α` is a
separable element.
- `Field.finSepDegree_dvd_finrank`: the separable degree of any field extension `E / F` divides
the degree of `E / F`.
- `Field.finSepDegree_le_finrank`: the separable degree of a finite extension `E / F` is smaller
than the degree of `E / F`.
- `Field.finSepDegree_eq_finrank_iff`: if `E / F` is a finite extension, then its separable degree
is equal to its degree if and only if it is a separable extension.
- `IntermediateField.isSeparable_adjoin_simple_iff_isSeparable`: `F⟮x⟯ / F` is a separable extension
if and only if `x` is a separable element.
- `Algebra.IsSeparable.trans`: if `E / F` and `K / E` are both separable, then `K / F` is also
separable.
## Tags
separable degree, degree, polynomial
-/
open Module Polynomial IntermediateField Field
noncomputable section
universe u v w
variable (F : Type u) (E : Type v) [Field F] [Field E] [Algebra F E]
variable (K : Type w) [Field K] [Algebra F K]
namespace Field
/-- `Field.Emb F E` is the type of `F`-algebra homomorphisms from `E` to the algebraic closure
of `E`. -/
abbrev Emb := E →ₐ[F] AlgebraicClosure E
/-- If `E / F` is an algebraic extension, then the (finite) separable degree of `E / F`
is the number of `F`-algebra homomorphisms from `E` to the algebraic closure of `E`,
as a natural number. It is defined to be zero if there are infinitely many of them.
Note that if `E / F` is not algebraic, then this definition makes no mathematical sense. -/
def finSepDegree : ℕ := Nat.card (Emb F E)
instance instInhabitedEmb : Inhabited (Emb F E) := ⟨IsScalarTower.toAlgHom F E _⟩
instance instNeZeroFinSepDegree [FiniteDimensional F E] : NeZero (finSepDegree F E) :=
⟨Nat.card_ne_zero.2 ⟨inferInstance, Fintype.finite <| minpoly.AlgHom.fintype _ _ _⟩⟩
/-- A random bijection between `Field.Emb F E` and `Field.Emb F K` when `E` and `K` are isomorphic
as `F`-algebras. -/
def embEquivOfEquiv (i : E ≃ₐ[F] K) :
Emb F E ≃ Emb F K := AlgEquiv.arrowCongr i <| AlgEquiv.symm <| by
let _ : Algebra E K := i.toAlgHom.toRingHom.toAlgebra
have : Algebra.IsAlgebraic E K := by
constructor
intro x
have h := isAlgebraic_algebraMap (R := E) (A := K) (i.symm.toAlgHom x)
rw [show ∀ y : E, (algebraMap E K) y = i.toAlgHom y from fun y ↦ rfl] at h
simpa only [AlgEquiv.toAlgHom_eq_coe, AlgHom.coe_coe, AlgEquiv.apply_symm_apply] using h
apply AlgEquiv.restrictScalars (R := F) (S := E)
exact IsAlgClosure.equivOfAlgebraic E K (AlgebraicClosure K) (AlgebraicClosure E)
/-- If `E` and `K` are isomorphic as `F`-algebras, then they have the same `Field.finSepDegree`
over `F`. -/
theorem finSepDegree_eq_of_equiv (i : E ≃ₐ[F] K) :
finSepDegree F E = finSepDegree F K := Nat.card_congr (embEquivOfEquiv F E K i)
@[simp]
theorem finSepDegree_self : finSepDegree F F = 1 := by
have : Cardinal.mk (Emb F F) = 1 := le_antisymm
(Cardinal.le_one_iff_subsingleton.2 AlgHom.subsingleton)
(Cardinal.one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 <| Cardinal.mk_ne_zero _)
rw [finSepDegree, Nat.card, this, Cardinal.one_toNat]
end Field
namespace IntermediateField
@[simp]
theorem finSepDegree_bot : finSepDegree F (⊥ : IntermediateField F E) = 1 := by
rw [finSepDegree_eq_of_equiv _ _ _ (botEquiv F E), finSepDegree_self]
section Tower
variable {F}
variable [Algebra E K] [IsScalarTower F E K]
@[simp]
theorem finSepDegree_bot' : finSepDegree F (⊥ : IntermediateField E K) = finSepDegree F E :=
finSepDegree_eq_of_equiv _ _ _ ((botEquiv E K).restrictScalars F)
@[simp]
theorem finSepDegree_top : finSepDegree F (⊤ : IntermediateField E K) = finSepDegree F K :=
finSepDegree_eq_of_equiv _ _ _ ((topEquiv (F := E) (E := K)).restrictScalars F)
end Tower
end IntermediateField
namespace Field
/-- A random bijection between `Field.Emb F E` and `E →ₐ[F] K` if `E = F(S)` such that every
element `s` of `S` is integral (= algebraic) over `F` and whose minimal polynomial splits in `K`.
Combined with `Field.instInhabitedEmb`, it can be viewed as a stronger version of
`IntermediateField.nonempty_algHom_of_adjoin_splits`. -/
def embEquivOfAdjoinSplits {S : Set E} (hS : adjoin F S = ⊤)
(hK : ∀ s ∈ S, IsIntegral F s ∧ Splits (algebraMap F K) (minpoly F s)) :
Emb F E ≃ (E →ₐ[F] K) :=
have : Algebra.IsAlgebraic F (⊤ : IntermediateField F E) :=
(hS ▸ isAlgebraic_adjoin (S := S) fun x hx ↦ (hK x hx).1)
have halg := (topEquiv (F := F) (E := E)).isAlgebraic
Classical.choice <| Function.Embedding.antisymm
(halg.algHomEmbeddingOfSplits (fun _ ↦ splits_of_mem_adjoin F E (S := S) hK (hS ▸ mem_top)) _)
(halg.algHomEmbeddingOfSplits (fun _ ↦ IsAlgClosed.splits_codomain _) _)
/-- The `Field.finSepDegree F E` is equal to the cardinality of `E →ₐ[F] K`
if `E = F(S)` such that every element
`s` of `S` is integral (= algebraic) over `F` and whose minimal polynomial splits in `K`. -/
theorem finSepDegree_eq_of_adjoin_splits {S : Set E} (hS : adjoin F S = ⊤)
(hK : ∀ s ∈ S, IsIntegral F s ∧ Splits (algebraMap F K) (minpoly F s)) :
finSepDegree F E = Nat.card (E →ₐ[F] K) := Nat.card_congr (embEquivOfAdjoinSplits F E K hS hK)
/-- A random bijection between `Field.Emb F E` and `E →ₐ[F] K` when `E / F` is algebraic
and `K / F` is algebraically closed. -/
def embEquivOfIsAlgClosed [Algebra.IsAlgebraic F E] [IsAlgClosed K] :
Emb F E ≃ (E →ₐ[F] K) :=
embEquivOfAdjoinSplits F E K (adjoin_univ F E) fun s _ ↦
⟨Algebra.IsIntegral.isIntegral s, IsAlgClosed.splits_codomain _⟩
/-- The `Field.finSepDegree F E` is equal to the cardinality of `E →ₐ[F] K` as a natural number,
when `E / F` is algebraic and `K / F` is algebraically closed. -/
@[stacks 09HJ "We use `finSepDegree` to state a more general result."]
theorem finSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed [Algebra.IsAlgebraic F E] [IsAlgClosed K] :
finSepDegree F E = Nat.card (E →ₐ[F] K) := Nat.card_congr (embEquivOfIsAlgClosed F E K)
/-- If `K / E / F` is a field extension tower, such that `K / E` is algebraic,
then there is a non-canonical bijection
`Field.Emb F E × Field.Emb E K ≃ Field.Emb F K`. A corollary of `algHomEquivSigma`. -/
def embProdEmbOfIsAlgebraic [Algebra E K] [IsScalarTower F E K] [Algebra.IsAlgebraic E K] :
Emb F E × Emb E K ≃ Emb F K :=
let e : ∀ f : E →ₐ[F] AlgebraicClosure K,
@AlgHom E K _ _ _ _ _ f.toRingHom.toAlgebra ≃ Emb E K := fun f ↦
(@embEquivOfIsAlgClosed E K _ _ _ _ _ f.toRingHom.toAlgebra).symm
(algHomEquivSigma (A := F) (B := E) (C := K) (D := AlgebraicClosure K) |>.trans
(Equiv.sigmaEquivProdOfEquiv e) |>.trans <| Equiv.prodCongrLeft <|
fun _ : Emb E K ↦ AlgEquiv.arrowCongr (@AlgEquiv.refl F E _ _ _) <|
(IsAlgClosure.equivOfAlgebraic E K (AlgebraicClosure K)
(AlgebraicClosure E)).restrictScalars F).symm
/-- If the field extension `E / F` is transcendental, then `Field.Emb F E` is infinite. -/
instance infinite_emb_of_transcendental [H : Algebra.Transcendental F E] : Infinite (Emb F E) := by
obtain ⟨ι, x, hx⟩ := exists_isTranscendenceBasis' F E
have := hx.isAlgebraic_field
rw [← (embProdEmbOfIsAlgebraic F (adjoin F (Set.range x)) E).infinite_iff]
refine @Prod.infinite_of_left _ _ ?_ _
rw [← (embEquivOfEquiv _ _ _ hx.1.aevalEquivField).infinite_iff]
obtain ⟨i⟩ := hx.nonempty_iff_transcendental.2 H
let K := FractionRing (MvPolynomial ι F)
let i1 := IsScalarTower.toAlgHom F (MvPolynomial ι F) (AlgebraicClosure K)
have hi1 : Function.Injective i1 := by
rw [IsScalarTower.coe_toAlgHom', IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq _ K]
exact (algebraMap K (AlgebraicClosure K)).injective.comp (IsFractionRing.injective _ _)
let f (n : ℕ) : Emb F K := IsFractionRing.liftAlgHom
(g := i1.comp <| MvPolynomial.aeval fun i : ι ↦ MvPolynomial.X i ^ (n + 1)) <| hi1.comp <| by
simpa [algebraicIndependent_iff_injective_aeval] using
MvPolynomial.algebraicIndependent_polynomial_aeval_X _
fun i : ι ↦ (Polynomial.transcendental_X F).pow n.succ_pos
refine Infinite.of_injective f fun m n h ↦ ?_
replace h : (MvPolynomial.X i) ^ (m + 1) = (MvPolynomial.X i) ^ (n + 1) := hi1 <| by
simpa [f, -map_pow] using congr($h (algebraMap _ K (MvPolynomial.X (R := F) i)))
simpa using congr(MvPolynomial.totalDegree $h)
/-- If the field extension `E / F` is transcendental, then `Field.finSepDegree F E = 0`, which
actually means that `Field.Emb F E` is infinite (see `Field.infinite_emb_of_transcendental`). -/
theorem finSepDegree_eq_zero_of_transcendental [Algebra.Transcendental F E] :
finSepDegree F E = 0 := Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite
/-- If `K / E / F` is a field extension tower, such that `K / E` is algebraic, then their
separable degrees satisfy the tower law
$[E:F]_s [K:E]_s = [K:F]_s$. See also `Module.finrank_mul_finrank`. -/
@[stacks 09HK "Part 1, `finSepDegree` variant"]
theorem finSepDegree_mul_finSepDegree_of_isAlgebraic
[Algebra E K] [IsScalarTower F E K] [Algebra.IsAlgebraic E K] :
finSepDegree F E * finSepDegree E K = finSepDegree F K := by
simpa only [Nat.card_prod] using Nat.card_congr (embProdEmbOfIsAlgebraic F E K)
end Field
namespace Polynomial
variable {F E}
variable (f : F[X])
open Classical in
/-- The separable degree `Polynomial.natSepDegree` of a polynomial is a natural number,
defined to be the number of distinct roots of it over its splitting field.
This is similar to `Polynomial.natDegree` but not to `Polynomial.degree`, namely, the separable
degree of `0` is `0`, not negative infinity. -/
def natSepDegree : ℕ := (f.aroots f.SplittingField).toFinset.card
/-- The separable degree of a polynomial is smaller than its degree. -/
theorem natSepDegree_le_natDegree : f.natSepDegree ≤ f.natDegree := by
have := f.map (algebraMap F f.SplittingField) |>.card_roots'
rw [← aroots_def, natDegree_map] at this
classical
exact (f.aroots f.SplittingField).toFinset_card_le.trans this
@[simp]
theorem natSepDegree_X_sub_C (x : F) : (X - C x).natSepDegree = 1 := by
simp only [natSepDegree, aroots_X_sub_C, Multiset.toFinset_singleton, Finset.card_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem natSepDegree_X : (X : F[X]).natSepDegree = 1 := by
simp only [natSepDegree, aroots_X, Multiset.toFinset_singleton, Finset.card_singleton]
/-- A constant polynomial has zero separable degree. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_zero (h : f.natDegree = 0) : f.natSepDegree = 0 := by
linarith only [natSepDegree_le_natDegree f, h]
@[simp]
theorem natSepDegree_C (x : F) : (C x).natSepDegree = 0 := natSepDegree_eq_zero _ (natDegree_C _)
@[simp]
theorem natSepDegree_zero : (0 : F[X]).natSepDegree = 0 := by
rw [← C_0, natSepDegree_C]
@[simp]
theorem natSepDegree_one : (1 : F[X]).natSepDegree = 0 := by
rw [← C_1, natSepDegree_C]
/-- A non-constant polynomial has non-zero separable degree. -/
theorem natSepDegree_ne_zero (h : f.natDegree ≠ 0) : f.natSepDegree ≠ 0 := by
rw [natSepDegree, ne_eq, Finset.card_eq_zero, ← ne_eq, ← Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
use rootOfSplits _ (SplittingField.splits f) (ne_of_apply_ne _ h)
classical
rw [Multiset.mem_toFinset, mem_aroots]
exact ⟨ne_of_apply_ne _ h, map_rootOfSplits _ (SplittingField.splits f) (ne_of_apply_ne _ h)⟩
/-- A polynomial has zero separable degree if and only if it is constant. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_zero_iff : f.natSepDegree = 0 ↔ f.natDegree = 0 :=
⟨(natSepDegree_ne_zero f).mtr, natSepDegree_eq_zero f⟩
/-- A polynomial has non-zero separable degree if and only if it is non-constant. -/
theorem natSepDegree_ne_zero_iff : f.natSepDegree ≠ 0 ↔ f.natDegree ≠ 0 :=
Iff.not <| natSepDegree_eq_zero_iff f
/-- The separable degree of a non-zero polynomial is equal to its degree if and only if
it is separable. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_natDegree_iff (hf : f ≠ 0) :
f.natSepDegree = f.natDegree ↔ f.Separable := by
classical
simp_rw [← card_rootSet_eq_natDegree_iff_of_splits hf (SplittingField.splits f),
rootSet_def, Finset.coe_sort_coe, Fintype.card_coe]
rfl
/-- If a polynomial is separable, then its separable degree is equal to its degree. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_natDegree_of_separable (h : f.Separable) :
f.natSepDegree = f.natDegree := (natSepDegree_eq_natDegree_iff f h.ne_zero).2 h
variable {f} in
/-- Same as `Polynomial.natSepDegree_eq_natDegree_of_separable`, but enables the use of
dot notation. -/
theorem Separable.natSepDegree_eq_natDegree (h : f.Separable) :
f.natSepDegree = f.natDegree := natSepDegree_eq_natDegree_of_separable f h
/-- If a polynomial splits over `E`, then its separable degree is equal to
the number of distinct roots of it over `E`. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_of_splits [DecidableEq E] (h : f.Splits (algebraMap F E)) :
f.natSepDegree = (f.aroots E).toFinset.card := by
classical
rw [aroots, ← (SplittingField.lift f h).comp_algebraMap, ← map_map,
roots_map _ ((splits_id_iff_splits _).mpr <| SplittingField.splits f),
Multiset.toFinset_map, Finset.card_image_of_injective _ (RingHom.injective _), natSepDegree]
variable (E) in
/-- The separable degree of a polynomial is equal to
the number of distinct roots of it over any algebraically closed field. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed [DecidableEq E] [IsAlgClosed E] :
f.natSepDegree = (f.aroots E).toFinset.card :=
natSepDegree_eq_of_splits f (IsAlgClosed.splits_codomain f)
theorem natSepDegree_map (f : E[X]) (i : E →+* K) : (f.map i).natSepDegree = f.natSepDegree := by
classical
let _ := i.toAlgebra
simp_rw [show i = algebraMap E K by rfl, natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (AlgebraicClosure K),
aroots_def, map_map, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq]
@[simp]
theorem natSepDegree_C_mul {x : F} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(C x * f).natSepDegree = f.natSepDegree := by
classical
simp only [natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (AlgebraicClosure F), aroots_C_mul _ hx]
@[simp]
theorem natSepDegree_smul_nonzero {x : F} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(x • f).natSepDegree = f.natSepDegree := by
classical
simp only [natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (AlgebraicClosure F), aroots_smul_nonzero _ hx]
@[simp]
theorem natSepDegree_pow {n : ℕ} : (f ^ n).natSepDegree = if n = 0 then 0 else f.natSepDegree := by
classical
simp only [natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (AlgebraicClosure F), aroots_pow]
by_cases h : n = 0
· simp only [h, zero_smul, Multiset.toFinset_zero, Finset.card_empty, ite_true]
simp only [h, Multiset.toFinset_nsmul _ n h, ite_false]
theorem natSepDegree_pow_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(f ^ n).natSepDegree = f.natSepDegree := by simp_rw [natSepDegree_pow, hn, ite_false]
theorem natSepDegree_X_pow {n : ℕ} : (X ^ n : F[X]).natSepDegree = if n = 0 then 0 else 1 := by
simp only [natSepDegree_pow, natSepDegree_X]
theorem natSepDegree_X_sub_C_pow {x : F} {n : ℕ} :
((X - C x) ^ n).natSepDegree = if n = 0 then 0 else 1 := by
simp only [natSepDegree_pow, natSepDegree_X_sub_C]
theorem natSepDegree_C_mul_X_sub_C_pow {x y : F} {n : ℕ} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(C x * (X - C y) ^ n).natSepDegree = if n = 0 then 0 else 1 := by
simp only [natSepDegree_C_mul _ hx, natSepDegree_X_sub_C_pow]
theorem natSepDegree_mul (g : F[X]) :
(f * g).natSepDegree ≤ f.natSepDegree + g.natSepDegree := by
by_cases h : f * g = 0
· simp only [h, natSepDegree_zero, zero_le]
classical
simp_rw [natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (AlgebraicClosure F), aroots_mul h, Multiset.toFinset_add]
exact Finset.card_union_le _ _
theorem natSepDegree_mul_eq_iff (g : F[X]) :
(f * g).natSepDegree = f.natSepDegree + g.natSepDegree ↔ (f = 0 ∧ g = 0) ∨ IsCoprime f g := by
by_cases h : f * g = 0
· rw [mul_eq_zero] at h
wlog hf : f = 0 generalizing f g
· simpa only [mul_comm, add_comm, and_comm,
isCoprime_comm] using this g f h.symm (h.resolve_left hf)
rw [hf, zero_mul, natSepDegree_zero, zero_add, isCoprime_zero_left, isUnit_iff, eq_comm,
natSepDegree_eq_zero_iff, natDegree_eq_zero]
refine ⟨fun ⟨x, h⟩ ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· by_cases hx : x = 0
· exact .inl ⟨rfl, by rw [← h, hx, map_zero]⟩
exact .inr ⟨x, Ne.isUnit hx, h⟩
rintro (⟨-, h⟩ | ⟨x, -, h⟩)
· exact ⟨0, by rw [h, map_zero]⟩
exact ⟨x, h⟩
classical
simp_rw [natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (AlgebraicClosure F), aroots_mul h, Multiset.toFinset_add,
Finset.card_union_eq_card_add_card, Finset.disjoint_iff_ne, Multiset.mem_toFinset, mem_aroots]
rw [mul_eq_zero, not_or] at h
refine ⟨fun H ↦ .inr (isCoprime_of_irreducible_dvd (not_and.2 fun _ ↦ h.2)
fun u hu ⟨v, hf⟩ ⟨w, hg⟩ ↦ ?_), ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := IsAlgClosed.exists_aeval_eq_zero
(AlgebraicClosure F) _ (degree_pos_of_irreducible hu).ne'
exact H x ⟨h.1, by simpa only [map_mul, hx, zero_mul] using congr(aeval x $hf)⟩
x ⟨h.2, by simpa only [map_mul, hx, zero_mul] using congr(aeval x $hg)⟩ rfl
rintro (⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | hc)
· exact (h.1 rfl).elim
rintro x hf _ hg rfl
obtain ⟨u, v, hfg⟩ := hc
simpa only [map_add, map_mul, map_one, hf.2, hg.2, mul_zero, add_zero,
zero_ne_one] using congr(aeval x $hfg)
theorem natSepDegree_mul_of_isCoprime (g : F[X]) (hc : IsCoprime f g) :
(f * g).natSepDegree = f.natSepDegree + g.natSepDegree :=
(natSepDegree_mul_eq_iff f g).2 (.inr hc)
theorem natSepDegree_le_of_dvd (g : F[X]) (h1 : f ∣ g) (h2 : g ≠ 0) :
f.natSepDegree ≤ g.natSepDegree := by
classical
simp_rw [natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (AlgebraicClosure F)]
exact Finset.card_le_card <| Multiset.toFinset_subset.mpr <|
Multiset.Le.subset <| roots.le_of_dvd (map_ne_zero h2) <| map_dvd _ h1
/-- If a field `F` is of exponential characteristic `q`, then `Polynomial.expand F (q ^ n) f`
and `f` have the same separable degree. -/
theorem natSepDegree_expand (q : ℕ) [hF : ExpChar F q] {n : ℕ} :
(expand F (q ^ n) f).natSepDegree = f.natSepDegree := by
obtain - | hprime := hF
· simp only [one_pow, expand_one]
haveI := Fact.mk hprime
classical
simpa only [natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (AlgebraicClosure F), aroots_def, map_expand,
Fintype.card_coe] using Fintype.card_eq.2
⟨(f.map (algebraMap F (AlgebraicClosure F))).rootsExpandPowEquivRoots q n⟩
theorem natSepDegree_X_pow_char_pow_sub_C (q : ℕ) [ExpChar F q] (n : ℕ) (y : F) :
(X ^ q ^ n - C y).natSepDegree = 1 := by
rw [← expand_X, ← expand_C (q ^ n), ← map_sub, natSepDegree_expand, natSepDegree_X_sub_C]
variable {f} in
/-- If `g` is a separable contraction of `f`, then the separable degree of `f` is equal to
the degree of `g`. -/
theorem IsSeparableContraction.natSepDegree_eq {g : Polynomial F} {q : ℕ} [ExpChar F q]
(h : IsSeparableContraction q f g) : f.natSepDegree = g.natDegree := by
obtain ⟨h1, m, h2⟩ := h
rw [← h2, natSepDegree_expand, h1.natSepDegree_eq_natDegree]
variable {f} in
/-- If a polynomial has separable contraction, then its separable degree is equal to the degree of
the given separable contraction. -/
theorem HasSeparableContraction.natSepDegree_eq
{q : ℕ} [ExpChar F q] (hf : f.HasSeparableContraction q) :
f.natSepDegree = hf.degree := hf.isSeparableContraction.natSepDegree_eq
end Polynomial
namespace Irreducible
variable {F}
variable {f : F[X]}
/-- The separable degree of an irreducible polynomial divides its degree. -/
theorem natSepDegree_dvd_natDegree (h : Irreducible f) :
f.natSepDegree ∣ f.natDegree := by
obtain ⟨q, _⟩ := ExpChar.exists F
have hf := h.hasSeparableContraction q
rw [hf.natSepDegree_eq]
exact hf.dvd_degree
/-- A monic irreducible polynomial over a field `F` of exponential characteristic `q` has
separable degree one if and only if it is of the form `Polynomial.expand F (q ^ n) (X - C y)`
for some `n : ℕ` and `y : F`. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_of_monic' (q : ℕ) [ExpChar F q] (hm : f.Monic)
(hi : Irreducible f) : f.natSepDegree = 1 ↔
∃ (n : ℕ) (y : F), f = expand F (q ^ n) (X - C y) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨n, y, h⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨g, h1, n, rfl⟩ := hi.hasSeparableContraction q
have h2 : g.natDegree = 1 := by
rwa [natSepDegree_expand _ q, h1.natSepDegree_eq_natDegree] at h
rw [((monic_expand_iff <| expChar_pow_pos F q n).mp hm).eq_X_add_C h2]
exact ⟨n, -(g.coeff 0), by rw [map_neg, sub_neg_eq_add]⟩
rw [h, natSepDegree_expand _ q, natSepDegree_X_sub_C]
/-- A monic irreducible polynomial over a field `F` of exponential characteristic `q` has
separable degree one if and only if it is of the form `X ^ (q ^ n) - C y`
for some `n : ℕ` and `y : F`. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_of_monic (q : ℕ) [ExpChar F q] (hm : f.Monic)
(hi : Irreducible f) : f.natSepDegree = 1 ↔ ∃ (n : ℕ) (y : F), f = X ^ q ^ n - C y := by
simp_rw [hi.natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_of_monic' q hm, map_sub, expand_X, expand_C]
end Irreducible
namespace Polynomial
namespace Monic
variable {F}
variable {f : F[X]}
alias natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_of_irreducible' := Irreducible.natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_of_monic'
alias natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_of_irreducible := Irreducible.natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_of_monic
/-- If a monic polynomial of separable degree one splits, then it is of form `(X - C y) ^ m` for
some non-zero natural number `m` and some element `y` of `F`. -/
theorem eq_X_sub_C_pow_of_natSepDegree_eq_one_of_splits (hm : f.Monic)
(hs : f.Splits (RingHom.id F))
(h : f.natSepDegree = 1) : ∃ (m : ℕ) (y : F), m ≠ 0 ∧ f = (X - C y) ^ m := by
classical
have h1 := eq_prod_roots_of_monic_of_splits_id hm hs
have h2 := (natSepDegree_eq_of_splits f hs).symm
rw [h, aroots_def, Algebra.id.map_eq_id, map_id, Multiset.toFinset_card_eq_one_iff] at h2
obtain ⟨h2, y, h3⟩ := h2
exact ⟨_, y, h2, by rwa [h3, Multiset.map_nsmul, Multiset.map_singleton, Multiset.prod_nsmul,
Multiset.prod_singleton] at h1⟩
/-- If a monic irreducible polynomial over a field `F` of exponential characteristic `q` has
separable degree one, then it is of the form `X ^ (q ^ n) - C y` for some natural number `n`,
and some element `y` of `F`, such that either `n = 0` or `y` has no `q`-th root in `F`. -/
theorem eq_X_pow_char_pow_sub_C_of_natSepDegree_eq_one_of_irreducible (q : ℕ) [ExpChar F q]
(hm : f.Monic) (hi : Irreducible f) (h : f.natSepDegree = 1) : ∃ (n : ℕ) (y : F),
(n = 0 ∨ y ∉ (frobenius F q).range) ∧ f = X ^ q ^ n - C y := by
obtain ⟨n, y, hf⟩ := (hm.natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_of_irreducible q hi).1 h
cases id ‹ExpChar F q› with
| zero =>
simp_rw [one_pow, pow_one] at hf ⊢
exact ⟨0, y, .inl rfl, hf⟩
| prime hq =>
refine ⟨n, y, (em _).imp id fun hn ⟨z, hy⟩ ↦ ?_, hf⟩
haveI := expChar_of_injective_ringHom (R := F) C_injective q
rw [hf, ← Nat.succ_pred hn, pow_succ, pow_mul, ← hy, frobenius_def, map_pow,
← sub_pow_expChar] at hi
exact not_irreducible_pow hq.ne_one hi
/-- If a monic polynomial over a field `F` of exponential characteristic `q` has separable degree
one, then it is of the form `(X ^ (q ^ n) - C y) ^ m` for some non-zero natural number `m`,
some natural number `n`, and some element `y` of `F`, such that either `n = 0` or `y` has no
`q`-th root in `F`. -/
theorem eq_X_pow_char_pow_sub_C_pow_of_natSepDegree_eq_one (q : ℕ) [ExpChar F q] (hm : f.Monic)
(h : f.natSepDegree = 1) : ∃ (m n : ℕ) (y : F),
m ≠ 0 ∧ (n = 0 ∨ y ∉ (frobenius F q).range) ∧ f = (X ^ q ^ n - C y) ^ m := by
obtain ⟨p, hM, hI, hf⟩ := exists_monic_irreducible_factor _ <| not_isUnit_of_natDegree_pos _
<| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero <| (natSepDegree_ne_zero_iff _).1 (h.symm ▸ Nat.one_ne_zero)
have hD := (h ▸ natSepDegree_le_of_dvd p f hf hm.ne_zero).antisymm <|
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero <| (natSepDegree_ne_zero_iff _).2 hI.natDegree_pos.ne'
obtain ⟨n, y, H, hp⟩ := hM.eq_X_pow_char_pow_sub_C_of_natSepDegree_eq_one_of_irreducible q hI hD
have hF := finiteMultiplicity_of_degree_pos_of_monic (degree_pos_of_irreducible hI) hM hm.ne_zero
classical
have hne := (multiplicity_pos_of_dvd hf).ne'
refine ⟨_, n, y, hne, H, ?_⟩
obtain ⟨c, hf, H⟩ := hF.exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd
rw [hf, natSepDegree_mul_of_isCoprime _ c <| IsCoprime.pow_left <|
(hI.isCoprime_or_dvd c).resolve_right H, natSepDegree_pow_of_ne_zero _ hne, hD,
add_eq_left, natSepDegree_eq_zero_iff] at h
simpa only [eq_one_of_monic_natDegree_zero ((hM.pow _).of_mul_monic_left (hf ▸ hm)) h,
mul_one, ← hp] using hf
/-- A monic polynomial over a field `F` of exponential characteristic `q` has separable degree one
if and only if it is of the form `(X ^ (q ^ n) - C y) ^ m` for some non-zero natural number `m`,
some natural number `n`, and some element `y` of `F`. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_one_iff (q : ℕ) [ExpChar F q] (hm : f.Monic) :
f.natSepDegree = 1 ↔ ∃ (m n : ℕ) (y : F), m ≠ 0 ∧ f = (X ^ q ^ n - C y) ^ m := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨m, n, y, hm, h⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨m, n, y, hm, -, h⟩ := hm.eq_X_pow_char_pow_sub_C_pow_of_natSepDegree_eq_one q h
exact ⟨m, n, y, hm, h⟩
simp_rw [h, natSepDegree_pow, hm, ite_false, natSepDegree_X_pow_char_pow_sub_C]
end Monic
end Polynomial
namespace minpoly
variable {F : Type u} {E : Type v} [Field F] [Ring E] [IsDomain E] [Algebra F E]
variable (q : ℕ) [hF : ExpChar F q] {x : E}
/-- The minimal polynomial of an element of `E / F` of exponential characteristic `q` has
separable degree one if and only if the minimal polynomial is of the form
`Polynomial.expand F (q ^ n) (X - C y)` for some `n : ℕ` and `y : F`. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_eq_expand_X_sub_C : (minpoly F x).natSepDegree = 1 ↔
∃ (n : ℕ) (y : F), minpoly F x = expand F (q ^ n) (X - C y) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨n, y, h⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
· have halg : IsIntegral F x := by_contra fun h' ↦ by
simp only [eq_zero h', natSepDegree_zero, zero_ne_one] at h
exact (minpoly.irreducible halg).natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_of_monic' q
(minpoly.monic halg) |>.1 h
rw [h, natSepDegree_expand _ q, natSepDegree_X_sub_C]
/-- The minimal polynomial of an element of `E / F` of exponential characteristic `q` has
separable degree one if and only if the minimal polynomial is of the form
`X ^ (q ^ n) - C y` for some `n : ℕ` and `y : F`. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_eq_X_pow_sub_C : (minpoly F x).natSepDegree = 1 ↔
∃ (n : ℕ) (y : F), minpoly F x = X ^ q ^ n - C y := by
simp only [minpoly.natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_eq_expand_X_sub_C q, map_sub, expand_X, expand_C]
/-- The minimal polynomial of an element `x` of `E / F` of exponential characteristic `q` has
separable degree one if and only if `x ^ (q ^ n) ∈ F` for some `n : ℕ`. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_pow_mem : (minpoly F x).natSepDegree = 1 ↔
∃ n : ℕ, x ^ q ^ n ∈ (algebraMap F E).range := by
convert_to _ ↔ ∃ (n : ℕ) (y : F), Polynomial.aeval x (X ^ q ^ n - C y) = 0
· simp_rw [RingHom.mem_range, map_sub, map_pow, aeval_C, aeval_X, sub_eq_zero, eq_comm]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨n, y, h⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨n, y, hx⟩ := (minpoly.natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_eq_X_pow_sub_C q).1 h
exact ⟨n, y, hx ▸ aeval F x⟩
have hnezero := X_pow_sub_C_ne_zero (expChar_pow_pos F q n) y
refine ((natSepDegree_le_of_dvd _ _ (minpoly.dvd F x h) hnezero).trans_eq <|
natSepDegree_X_pow_char_pow_sub_C q n y).antisymm ?_
rw [Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero, natSepDegree_ne_zero_iff, ← Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
exact minpoly.natDegree_pos <| IsAlgebraic.isIntegral ⟨_, hnezero, h⟩
/-- The minimal polynomial of an element `x` of `E / F` of exponential characteristic `q` has
separable degree one if and only if the minimal polynomial is of the form
`(X - x) ^ (q ^ n)` for some `n : ℕ`. -/
theorem natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_eq_X_sub_C_pow : (minpoly F x).natSepDegree = 1 ↔
∃ n : ℕ, (minpoly F x).map (algebraMap F E) = (X - C x) ^ q ^ n := by
haveI := expChar_of_injective_algebraMap (algebraMap F E).injective q
haveI := expChar_of_injective_ringHom (C_injective (R := E)) q
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨n, h⟩ ↦ (natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_pow_mem q).2 ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨n, y, h⟩ := (natSepDegree_eq_one_iff_eq_X_pow_sub_C q).1 h
have hx := congr_arg (Polynomial.aeval x) h.symm
rw [minpoly.aeval, map_sub, map_pow, aeval_X, aeval_C, sub_eq_zero, eq_comm] at hx
use n
rw [h, Polynomial.map_sub, Polynomial.map_pow, map_X, map_C, hx, map_pow,
← sub_pow_expChar_pow_of_commute _ _ (commute_X _)]
apply_fun constantCoeff at h
simp_rw [map_pow, map_sub, constantCoeff_apply, coeff_map, coeff_X_zero, coeff_C_zero] at h
rw [zero_sub, neg_pow, neg_one_pow_expChar_pow] at h
exact ⟨n, -(minpoly F x).coeff 0, by rw [map_neg, h, neg_mul, one_mul, neg_neg]⟩
end minpoly
namespace IntermediateField
/-- The separable degree of `F⟮α⟯ / F` is equal to the separable degree of the
minimal polynomial of `α` over `F`. -/
theorem finSepDegree_adjoin_simple_eq_natSepDegree {α : E} (halg : IsAlgebraic F α) :
finSepDegree F F⟮α⟯ = (minpoly F α).natSepDegree := by
have : finSepDegree F F⟮α⟯ = _ := Nat.card_congr
(algHomAdjoinIntegralEquiv F (K := AlgebraicClosure F⟮α⟯) halg.isIntegral)
classical
rw [this, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, natSepDegree_eq_of_isAlgClosed (E := AlgebraicClosure F⟮α⟯),
← Fintype.card_coe]
simp_rw [Multiset.mem_toFinset]
-- The separable degree of `F⟮α⟯ / F` divides the degree of `F⟮α⟯ / F`.
-- Marked as `private` because it is a special case of `finSepDegree_dvd_finrank`.
private theorem finSepDegree_adjoin_simple_dvd_finrank (α : E) :
finSepDegree F F⟮α⟯ ∣ finrank F F⟮α⟯ := by
by_cases halg : IsAlgebraic F α
· rw [finSepDegree_adjoin_simple_eq_natSepDegree F E halg, adjoin.finrank halg.isIntegral]
exact (minpoly.irreducible halg.isIntegral).natSepDegree_dvd_natDegree
have : finrank F F⟮α⟯ = 0 := finrank_of_infinite_dimensional fun _ ↦
halg ((AdjoinSimple.isIntegral_gen F α).1 (IsIntegral.of_finite F _)).isAlgebraic
rw [this]
exact dvd_zero _
/-- The separable degree of `F⟮α⟯ / F` is smaller than the degree of `F⟮α⟯ / F` if `α` is
algebraic over `F`. -/
theorem finSepDegree_adjoin_simple_le_finrank (α : E) (halg : IsAlgebraic F α) :
finSepDegree F F⟮α⟯ ≤ finrank F F⟮α⟯ := by
haveI := adjoin.finiteDimensional halg.isIntegral
exact Nat.le_of_dvd finrank_pos <| finSepDegree_adjoin_simple_dvd_finrank F E α
/-- If `α` is algebraic over `F`, then the separable degree of `F⟮α⟯ / F` is equal to the degree
of `F⟮α⟯ / F` if and only if `α` is a separable element. -/
theorem finSepDegree_adjoin_simple_eq_finrank_iff (α : E) (halg : IsAlgebraic F α) :
finSepDegree F F⟮α⟯ = finrank F F⟮α⟯ ↔ IsSeparable F α := by
rw [finSepDegree_adjoin_simple_eq_natSepDegree F E halg, adjoin.finrank halg.isIntegral,
natSepDegree_eq_natDegree_iff _ (minpoly.ne_zero halg.isIntegral), IsSeparable]
end IntermediateField
namespace Field
/-- The separable degree of any field extension `E / F` divides the degree of `E / F`. -/
theorem finSepDegree_dvd_finrank : finSepDegree F E ∣ finrank F E := by
by_cases hfd : FiniteDimensional F E
· rw [← finSepDegree_top F, ← finrank_top F E]
refine induction_on_adjoin (fun K : IntermediateField F E ↦ finSepDegree F K ∣ finrank F K)
(by simp_rw [finSepDegree_bot, IntermediateField.finrank_bot, one_dvd]) (fun L x h ↦ ?_) ⊤
simp only at h ⊢
have hdvd := mul_dvd_mul h <| finSepDegree_adjoin_simple_dvd_finrank L E x
set M := L⟮x⟯
have := Algebra.IsAlgebraic.of_finite L M
rwa [finSepDegree_mul_finSepDegree_of_isAlgebraic F L M,
Module.finrank_mul_finrank F L M] at hdvd
rw [finrank_of_infinite_dimensional hfd]
exact dvd_zero _
/-- The separable degree of a finite extension `E / F` is smaller than the degree of `E / F`. -/
@[stacks 09HA "The inequality"]
theorem finSepDegree_le_finrank [FiniteDimensional F E] :
finSepDegree F E ≤ finrank F E := Nat.le_of_dvd finrank_pos <| finSepDegree_dvd_finrank F E
/-- If `E / F` is a separable extension, then its separable degree is equal to its degree.
When `E / F` is infinite, it means that `Field.Emb F E` has infinitely many elements.
(But the cardinality of `Field.Emb F E` is not equal to `Module.rank F E` in general!) -/
theorem finSepDegree_eq_finrank_of_isSeparable [Algebra.IsSeparable F E] :
finSepDegree F E = finrank F E := by
wlog hfd : FiniteDimensional F E generalizing E with H
· rw [finrank_of_infinite_dimensional hfd]
have halg := Algebra.IsSeparable.isAlgebraic F E
obtain ⟨L, h, h'⟩ := exists_lt_finrank_of_infinite_dimensional hfd (finSepDegree F E)
have : Algebra.IsSeparable F L := Algebra.isSeparable_tower_bot_of_isSeparable F L E
have := (halg.tower_top L)
have hd := finSepDegree_mul_finSepDegree_of_isAlgebraic F L E
rw [H L h] at hd
by_cases hd' : finSepDegree L E = 0
· rw [← hd, hd', mul_zero]
linarith only [h', hd, Nat.le_mul_of_pos_right (finrank F L) (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hd')]
rw [← finSepDegree_top F, ← finrank_top F E]
refine induction_on_adjoin (fun K : IntermediateField F E ↦ finSepDegree F K = finrank F K)
(by simp_rw [finSepDegree_bot, IntermediateField.finrank_bot]) (fun L x h ↦ ?_) ⊤
simp only at h ⊢
have heq : _ * _ = _ * _ := congr_arg₂ (· * ·) h <|
(finSepDegree_adjoin_simple_eq_finrank_iff L E x (IsAlgebraic.of_finite L x)).2 <|
IsSeparable.tower_top L (Algebra.IsSeparable.isSeparable F x)
set M := L⟮x⟯
have := Algebra.IsAlgebraic.of_finite L M
rwa [finSepDegree_mul_finSepDegree_of_isAlgebraic F L M,
Module.finrank_mul_finrank F L M] at heq
alias Algebra.IsSeparable.finSepDegree_eq := finSepDegree_eq_finrank_of_isSeparable
/-- If `E / F` is a finite extension, then its separable degree is equal to its degree if and
only if it is a separable extension. -/
@[stacks 09HA "The equality condition"]
theorem finSepDegree_eq_finrank_iff [FiniteDimensional F E] :
finSepDegree F E = finrank F E ↔ Algebra.IsSeparable F E :=
⟨fun heq ↦ ⟨fun x ↦ by
have halg := IsAlgebraic.of_finite F x
refine (finSepDegree_adjoin_simple_eq_finrank_iff F E x halg).1 <| le_antisymm
(finSepDegree_adjoin_simple_le_finrank F E x halg) <| le_of_not_lt fun h ↦ ?_
have := Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le' h (finSepDegree_le_finrank F⟮x⟯ E) Fin.pos'
rw [finSepDegree_mul_finSepDegree_of_isAlgebraic F F⟮x⟯ E,
Module.finrank_mul_finrank F F⟮x⟯ E] at this
linarith only [heq, this]⟩, fun _ ↦ finSepDegree_eq_finrank_of_isSeparable F E⟩
end Field
lemma IntermediateField.isSeparable_of_mem_isSeparable {L : IntermediateField F E}
[Algebra.IsSeparable F L] {x : E} (h : x ∈ L) : IsSeparable F x := by
simpa only [IsSeparable, minpoly_eq] using Algebra.IsSeparable.isSeparable F (K := L) ⟨x, h⟩
/-- `F⟮x⟯ / F` is a separable extension if and only if `x` is a separable element.
As a consequence, any rational function of `x` is also a separable element. -/
theorem IntermediateField.isSeparable_adjoin_simple_iff_isSeparable {x : E} :
Algebra.IsSeparable F F⟮x⟯ ↔ IsSeparable F x := by
refine ⟨fun _ ↦ ?_, fun hsep ↦ ?_⟩
· exact isSeparable_of_mem_isSeparable F E <| mem_adjoin_simple_self F x
· have h := IsSeparable.isIntegral hsep
haveI := adjoin.finiteDimensional h
rwa [← finSepDegree_eq_finrank_iff,
finSepDegree_adjoin_simple_eq_finrank_iff F E x h.isAlgebraic]
variable {E K} in
/-- If `K / E / F` is an extension tower such that `E / F` is separable,
`x : K` is separable over `E`, then it's also separable over `F`. -/
| theorem IsSeparable.of_algebra_isSeparable_of_isSeparable [Algebra E K] [IsScalarTower F E K]
[Algebra.IsSeparable F E] {x : K} (hsep : IsSeparable E x) : IsSeparable F x := by
set f := minpoly E x with hf
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/SeparableDegree.lean | 807 | 809 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Ziyu Wang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Ziyu Wang, Chenyi Li, Sébastien Gouëzel, Penghao Yu, Zhipeng Cao
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Dual
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Basic
/-!
# Gradient
## Main Definitions
Let `f` be a function from a Hilbert Space `F` to `𝕜` (`𝕜` is `ℝ` or `ℂ`) , `x` be a point in `F`
and `f'` be a vector in F. Then
`HasGradientWithinAt f f' s x`
says that `f` has a gradient `f'` at `x`, where the domain of interest
is restricted to `s`. We also have
`HasGradientAt f f' x := HasGradientWithinAt f f' x univ`
## Main results
This file contains the following parts of gradient.
* the definition of gradient.
* the theorems translating between `HasGradientAtFilter` and `HasFDerivAtFilter`,
`HasGradientWithinAt` and `HasFDerivWithinAt`, `HasGradientAt` and `HasFDerivAt`,
`Gradient` and `fderiv`.
* theorems the Uniqueness of Gradient.
* the theorems translating between `HasGradientAtFilter` and `HasDerivAtFilter`,
`HasGradientAt` and `HasDerivAt`, `Gradient` and `deriv` when `F = 𝕜`.
* the theorems about the congruence of the gradient.
* the theorems about the gradient of constant function.
* the theorems about the continuity of a function admitting a gradient.
-/
open Topology InnerProductSpace Set
noncomputable section
variable {𝕜 F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 F] [CompleteSpace F]
variable {f : F → 𝕜} {f' x : F}
/-- A function `f` has the gradient `f'` as derivative along the filter `L` if
`f x' = f x + ⟨f', x' - x⟩ + o (x' - x)` when `x'` converges along the filter `L`. -/
def HasGradientAtFilter (f : F → 𝕜) (f' x : F) (L : Filter F) :=
HasFDerivAtFilter f (toDual 𝕜 F f') x L
/-- `f` has the gradient `f'` at the point `x` within the subset `s` if
`f x' = f x + ⟨f', x' - x⟩ + o (x' - x)` where `x'` converges to `x` inside `s`. -/
def HasGradientWithinAt (f : F → 𝕜) (f' : F) (s : Set F) (x : F) :=
HasGradientAtFilter f f' x (𝓝[s] x)
/-- `f` has the gradient `f'` at the point `x` if
`f x' = f x + ⟨f', x' - x⟩ + o (x' - x)` where `x'` converges to `x`. -/
def HasGradientAt (f : F → 𝕜) (f' x : F) :=
HasGradientAtFilter f f' x (𝓝 x)
/-- Gradient of `f` at the point `x` within the set `s`, if it exists. Zero otherwise.
If the derivative exists (i.e., `∃ f', HasGradientWithinAt f f' s x`), then
`f x' = f x + ⟨f', x' - x⟩ + o (x' - x)` where `x'` converges to `x` inside `s`. -/
def gradientWithin (f : F → 𝕜) (s : Set F) (x : F) : F :=
(toDual 𝕜 F).symm (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x)
/-- Gradient of `f` at the point `x`, if it exists. Zero otherwise.
Denoted as `∇` within the Gradient namespace.
If the derivative exists (i.e., `∃ f', HasGradientAt f f' x`), then
`f x' = f x + ⟨f', x' - x⟩ + o (x' - x)` where `x'` converges to `x`. -/
def gradient (f : F → 𝕜) (x : F) : F :=
(toDual 𝕜 F).symm (fderiv 𝕜 f x)
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[Gradient] notation "∇" => gradient
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
open scoped Gradient
variable {s : Set F} {L : Filter F}
theorem hasGradientWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt {s : Set F} :
HasGradientWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f (toDual 𝕜 F f') s x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_iff_hasGradientWithinAt {frechet : F →L[𝕜] 𝕜} {s : Set F} :
HasFDerivWithinAt f frechet s x ↔ HasGradientWithinAt f ((toDual 𝕜 F).symm frechet) s x := by
rw [hasGradientWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt, (toDual 𝕜 F).apply_symm_apply frechet]
theorem hasGradientAt_iff_hasFDerivAt :
HasGradientAt f f' x ↔ HasFDerivAt f (toDual 𝕜 F f') x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem hasFDerivAt_iff_hasGradientAt {frechet : F →L[𝕜] 𝕜} :
HasFDerivAt f frechet x ↔ HasGradientAt f ((toDual 𝕜 F).symm frechet) x := by
rw [hasGradientAt_iff_hasFDerivAt, (toDual 𝕜 F).apply_symm_apply frechet]
alias ⟨HasGradientWithinAt.hasFDerivWithinAt, _⟩ := hasGradientWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt
alias ⟨HasFDerivWithinAt.hasGradientWithinAt, _⟩ := hasFDerivWithinAt_iff_hasGradientWithinAt
alias ⟨HasGradientAt.hasFDerivAt, _⟩ := hasGradientAt_iff_hasFDerivAt
alias ⟨HasFDerivAt.hasGradientAt, _⟩ := hasFDerivAt_iff_hasGradientAt
theorem gradient_eq_zero_of_not_differentiableAt (h : ¬DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) : ∇ f x = 0 := by
rw [gradient, fderiv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt h, map_zero]
theorem HasGradientAt.unique {gradf gradg : F}
(hf : HasGradientAt f gradf x) (hg : HasGradientAt f gradg x) :
gradf = gradg :=
(toDual 𝕜 F).injective (hf.hasFDerivAt.unique hg.hasFDerivAt)
theorem DifferentiableAt.hasGradientAt (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) :
HasGradientAt f (∇ f x) x := by
rw [hasGradientAt_iff_hasFDerivAt, gradient, (toDual 𝕜 F).apply_symm_apply (fderiv 𝕜 f x)]
exact h.hasFDerivAt
theorem HasGradientAt.differentiableAt (h : HasGradientAt f f' x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
h.hasFDerivAt.differentiableAt
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.hasGradientWithinAt (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
HasGradientWithinAt f (gradientWithin f s x) s x := by
rw [hasGradientWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt, gradientWithin,
(toDual 𝕜 F).apply_symm_apply (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x)]
exact h.hasFDerivWithinAt
theorem HasGradientWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt (h : HasGradientWithinAt f f' s x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
h.hasFDerivWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt
@[simp]
theorem hasGradientWithinAt_univ : HasGradientWithinAt f f' univ x ↔ HasGradientAt f f' x := by
rw [hasGradientWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt, hasGradientAt_iff_hasFDerivAt]
exact hasFDerivWithinAt_univ
theorem DifferentiableOn.hasGradientAt (h : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasGradientAt f (∇ f x) x :=
(h.hasFDerivAt hs).hasGradientAt
theorem HasGradientAt.gradient (h : HasGradientAt f f' x) : ∇ f x = f' :=
h.differentiableAt.hasGradientAt.unique h
theorem gradient_eq {f' : F → F} (h : ∀ x, HasGradientAt f (f' x) x) : ∇ f = f' :=
funext fun x => (h x).gradient
section OneDimension
variable {g : 𝕜 → 𝕜} {g' u : 𝕜} {L' : Filter 𝕜}
theorem HasGradientAtFilter.hasDerivAtFilter (h : HasGradientAtFilter g g' u L') :
HasDerivAtFilter g (starRingEnd 𝕜 g') u L' := by
have : ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) (starRingEnd 𝕜 g') = (toDual 𝕜 𝕜) g' := by
ext; simp
rwa [HasDerivAtFilter, this]
|
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.hasGradientAtFilter (h : HasDerivAtFilter g g' u L') :
HasGradientAtFilter g (starRingEnd 𝕜 g') u L' := by
have : ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) g' = (toDual 𝕜 𝕜) (starRingEnd 𝕜 g') := by
ext; simp
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/Gradient/Basic.lean | 162 | 166 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 James Arthur. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: James Arthur, Chris Hughes, Shing Tak Lam
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Deriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Log.Basic
/-!
# Inverse of the sinh function
In this file we prove that sinh is bijective and hence has an
inverse, arsinh.
## Main definitions
- `Real.arsinh`: The inverse function of `Real.sinh`.
- `Real.sinhEquiv`, `Real.sinhOrderIso`, `Real.sinhHomeomorph`: `Real.sinh` as an `Equiv`,
`OrderIso`, and `Homeomorph`, respectively.
## Main Results
- `Real.sinh_surjective`, `Real.sinh_bijective`: `Real.sinh` is surjective and bijective;
- `Real.arsinh_injective`, `Real.arsinh_surjective`, `Real.arsinh_bijective`: `Real.arsinh` is
injective, surjective, and bijective;
- `Real.continuous_arsinh`, `Real.differentiable_arsinh`, `Real.contDiff_arsinh`: `Real.arsinh` is
continuous, differentiable, and continuously differentiable; we also provide dot notation
convenience lemmas like `Filter.Tendsto.arsinh` and `ContDiffAt.arsinh`.
## Tags
arsinh, arcsinh, argsinh, asinh, sinh injective, sinh bijective, sinh surjective
-/
noncomputable section
open Function Filter Set
open scoped Topology
namespace Real
variable {x y : ℝ}
/-- `arsinh` is defined using a logarithm, `arsinh x = log (x + sqrt(1 + x^2))`. -/
@[pp_nodot]
def arsinh (x : ℝ) :=
log (x + √(1 + x ^ 2))
theorem exp_arsinh (x : ℝ) : exp (arsinh x) = x + √(1 + x ^ 2) := by
apply exp_log
rw [← neg_lt_iff_pos_add']
apply lt_sqrt_of_sq_lt
simp
@[simp]
theorem arsinh_zero : arsinh 0 = 0 := by simp [arsinh]
@[simp]
theorem arsinh_neg (x : ℝ) : arsinh (-x) = -arsinh x := by
rw [← exp_eq_exp, exp_arsinh, exp_neg, exp_arsinh]
apply eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left
rw [neg_sq, neg_add_eq_sub, add_comm x, mul_comm, ← sq_sub_sq, sq_sqrt, add_sub_cancel_right]
exact add_nonneg zero_le_one (sq_nonneg _)
/-- `arsinh` is the right inverse of `sinh`. -/
@[simp]
theorem sinh_arsinh (x : ℝ) : sinh (arsinh x) = x := by
rw [sinh_eq, ← arsinh_neg, exp_arsinh, exp_arsinh, neg_sq]; field_simp
@[simp]
theorem cosh_arsinh (x : ℝ) : cosh (arsinh x) = √(1 + x ^ 2) := by
rw [← sqrt_sq (cosh_pos _).le, cosh_sq', sinh_arsinh]
/-- `sinh` is surjective, `∀ b, ∃ a, sinh a = b`. In this case, we use `a = arsinh b`. -/
theorem sinh_surjective : Surjective sinh :=
LeftInverse.surjective sinh_arsinh
/-- `sinh` is bijective, both injective and surjective. -/
theorem sinh_bijective : Bijective sinh :=
⟨sinh_injective, sinh_surjective⟩
/-- `arsinh` is the left inverse of `sinh`. -/
@[simp]
theorem arsinh_sinh (x : ℝ) : arsinh (sinh x) = x :=
rightInverse_of_injective_of_leftInverse sinh_injective sinh_arsinh x
/-- `Real.sinh` as an `Equiv`. -/
@[simps]
def sinhEquiv : ℝ ≃ ℝ where
toFun := sinh
invFun := arsinh
left_inv := arsinh_sinh
right_inv := sinh_arsinh
/-- `Real.sinh` as an `OrderIso`. -/
@[simps! -fullyApplied]
def sinhOrderIso : ℝ ≃o ℝ where
toEquiv := sinhEquiv
map_rel_iff' := @sinh_le_sinh
/-- `Real.sinh` as a `Homeomorph`. -/
@[simps! -fullyApplied]
def sinhHomeomorph : ℝ ≃ₜ ℝ :=
sinhOrderIso.toHomeomorph
theorem arsinh_bijective : Bijective arsinh :=
sinhEquiv.symm.bijective
theorem arsinh_injective : Injective arsinh :=
sinhEquiv.symm.injective
theorem arsinh_surjective : Surjective arsinh :=
sinhEquiv.symm.surjective
theorem arsinh_strictMono : StrictMono arsinh :=
sinhOrderIso.symm.strictMono
@[simp]
theorem arsinh_inj : arsinh x = arsinh y ↔ x = y :=
arsinh_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem arsinh_le_arsinh : arsinh x ≤ arsinh y ↔ x ≤ y :=
sinhOrderIso.symm.le_iff_le
@[gcongr] protected alias ⟨_, GCongr.arsinh_le_arsinh⟩ := arsinh_le_arsinh
@[simp]
theorem arsinh_lt_arsinh : arsinh x < arsinh y ↔ x < y :=
sinhOrderIso.symm.lt_iff_lt
@[simp]
theorem arsinh_eq_zero_iff : arsinh x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
arsinh_injective.eq_iff' arsinh_zero
@[simp]
theorem arsinh_nonneg_iff : 0 ≤ arsinh x ↔ 0 ≤ x := by rw [← sinh_le_sinh, sinh_zero, sinh_arsinh]
@[simp]
theorem arsinh_nonpos_iff : arsinh x ≤ 0 ↔ x ≤ 0 := by rw [← sinh_le_sinh, sinh_zero, sinh_arsinh]
@[simp]
theorem arsinh_pos_iff : 0 < arsinh x ↔ 0 < x :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le arsinh_nonpos_iff
@[simp]
theorem arsinh_neg_iff : arsinh x < 0 ↔ x < 0 :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le arsinh_nonneg_iff
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_arsinh (x : ℝ) : HasStrictDerivAt arsinh (√(1 + x ^ 2))⁻¹ x := by
convert sinhHomeomorph.toPartialHomeomorph.hasStrictDerivAt_symm (mem_univ x) (cosh_pos _).ne'
(hasStrictDerivAt_sinh _) using 2
exact (cosh_arsinh _).symm
theorem hasDerivAt_arsinh (x : ℝ) : HasDerivAt arsinh (√(1 + x ^ 2))⁻¹ x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_arsinh x).hasDerivAt
theorem differentiable_arsinh : Differentiable ℝ arsinh := fun x =>
(hasDerivAt_arsinh x).differentiableAt
theorem contDiff_arsinh {n : ℕ∞} : ContDiff ℝ n arsinh :=
sinhHomeomorph.contDiff_symm_deriv (fun x => (cosh_pos x).ne') hasDerivAt_sinh contDiff_sinh
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Arsinh.lean | 168 | 168 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.NAry
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Slice
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Sups
/-!
# Set family operations
This file defines a few binary operations on `Finset α` for use in set family combinatorics.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.sups s t`: Finset of elements of the form `a ⊔ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`.
* `Finset.infs s t`: Finset of elements of the form `a ⊓ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`.
* `Finset.disjSups s t`: Finset of elements of the form `a ⊔ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t` and `a`
and `b` are disjoint.
* `Finset.diffs`: Finset of elements of the form `a \ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`.
* `Finset.compls`: Finset of elements of the form `aᶜ` where `a ∈ s`.
## Notation
We define the following notation in locale `FinsetFamily`:
* `s ⊻ t` for `Finset.sups`
* `s ⊼ t` for `Finset.infs`
* `s ○ t` for `Finset.disjSups s t`
* `s \\ t` for `Finset.diffs`
* `sᶜˢ` for `Finset.compls`
## References
[B. Bollobás, *Combinatorics*][bollobas1986]
-/
open Function
open SetFamily
variable {F α β : Type*}
namespace Finset
section Sups
variable [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β]
variable [SemilatticeSup α] [SemilatticeSup β] [FunLike F α β] [SupHomClass F α β]
variable (s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u v : Finset α)
/-- `s ⊻ t` is the finset of elements of the form `a ⊔ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`. -/
protected def hasSups : HasSups (Finset α) :=
⟨image₂ (· ⊔ ·)⟩
scoped[FinsetFamily] attribute [instance] Finset.hasSups
open FinsetFamily
variable {s t} {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem mem_sups : c ∈ s ⊻ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, ∃ b ∈ t, a ⊔ b = c := by simp [(· ⊻ ·)]
variable (s t)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sups : (↑(s ⊻ t) : Set α) = ↑s ⊻ ↑t :=
coe_image₂ _ _ _
theorem card_sups_le : #(s ⊻ t) ≤ #s * #t := card_image₂_le _ _ _
theorem card_sups_iff : #(s ⊻ t) = #s * #t ↔ (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × α)).InjOn fun x => x.1 ⊔ x.2 :=
card_image₂_iff
variable {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u}
theorem sup_mem_sups : a ∈ s → b ∈ t → a ⊔ b ∈ s ⊻ t :=
mem_image₂_of_mem
theorem sups_subset : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s₁ ⊻ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ⊻ t₂ :=
image₂_subset
theorem sups_subset_left : t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s ⊻ t₁ ⊆ s ⊻ t₂ :=
image₂_subset_left
theorem sups_subset_right : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₁ ⊻ t ⊆ s₂ ⊻ t :=
image₂_subset_right
lemma image_subset_sups_left : b ∈ t → s.image (· ⊔ b) ⊆ s ⊻ t := image_subset_image₂_left
lemma image_subset_sups_right : a ∈ s → t.image (a ⊔ ·) ⊆ s ⊻ t := image_subset_image₂_right
theorem forall_sups_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∀ c ∈ s ⊻ t, p c) ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, p (a ⊔ b) :=
forall_mem_image₂
@[simp]
theorem sups_subset_iff : s ⊻ t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, a ⊔ b ∈ u :=
image₂_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem sups_nonempty : (s ⊻ t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty :=
image₂_nonempty_iff
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected theorem Nonempty.sups : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty → (s ⊻ t).Nonempty :=
Nonempty.image₂
theorem Nonempty.of_sups_left : (s ⊻ t).Nonempty → s.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_image₂_left
theorem Nonempty.of_sups_right : (s ⊻ t).Nonempty → t.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_image₂_right
@[simp]
theorem empty_sups : ∅ ⊻ t = ∅ :=
image₂_empty_left
@[simp]
theorem sups_empty : s ⊻ ∅ = ∅ :=
image₂_empty_right
@[simp]
theorem sups_eq_empty : s ⊻ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ :=
image₂_eq_empty_iff
@[simp] lemma singleton_sups : {a} ⊻ t = t.image (a ⊔ ·) := image₂_singleton_left
@[simp] lemma sups_singleton : s ⊻ {b} = s.image (· ⊔ b) := image₂_singleton_right
theorem singleton_sups_singleton : ({a} ⊻ {b} : Finset α) = {a ⊔ b} :=
image₂_singleton
theorem sups_union_left : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ⊻ t = s₁ ⊻ t ∪ s₂ ⊻ t :=
image₂_union_left
theorem sups_union_right : s ⊻ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s ⊻ t₁ ∪ s ⊻ t₂ :=
image₂_union_right
theorem sups_inter_subset_left : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ⊻ t ⊆ s₁ ⊻ t ∩ s₂ ⊻ t :=
image₂_inter_subset_left
theorem sups_inter_subset_right : s ⊻ (t₁ ∩ t₂) ⊆ s ⊻ t₁ ∩ s ⊻ t₂ :=
image₂_inter_subset_right
theorem subset_sups {s t : Set α} :
↑u ⊆ s ⊻ t → ∃ s' t' : Finset α, ↑s' ⊆ s ∧ ↑t' ⊆ t ∧ u ⊆ s' ⊻ t' :=
subset_set_image₂
lemma image_sups (f : F) (s t : Finset α) : image f (s ⊻ t) = image f s ⊻ image f t :=
image_image₂_distrib <| map_sup f
lemma map_sups (f : F) (hf) (s t : Finset α) :
map ⟨f, hf⟩ (s ⊻ t) = map ⟨f, hf⟩ s ⊻ map ⟨f, hf⟩ t := by
simpa [map_eq_image] using image_sups f s t
lemma subset_sups_self : s ⊆ s ⊻ s := fun _a ha ↦ mem_sups.2 ⟨_, ha, _, ha, sup_idem _⟩
lemma sups_subset_self : s ⊻ s ⊆ s ↔ SupClosed (s : Set α) := sups_subset_iff
@[simp] lemma sups_eq_self : s ⊻ s = s ↔ SupClosed (s : Set α) := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp] lemma univ_sups_univ [Fintype α] : (univ : Finset α) ⊻ univ = univ := by simp
lemma filter_sups_le [DecidableLE α] (s t : Finset α) (a : α) :
{b ∈ s ⊻ t | b ≤ a} = {b ∈ s | b ≤ a} ⊻ {b ∈ t | b ≤ a} := by
simp only [← coe_inj, coe_filter, coe_sups, ← mem_coe, Set.sep_sups_le]
variable (s t u)
lemma biUnion_image_sup_left : s.biUnion (fun a ↦ t.image (a ⊔ ·)) = s ⊻ t := biUnion_image_left
lemma biUnion_image_sup_right : t.biUnion (fun b ↦ s.image (· ⊔ b)) = s ⊻ t := biUnion_image_right
theorem image_sup_product (s t : Finset α) : (s ×ˢ t).image (uncurry (· ⊔ ·)) = s ⊻ t :=
image_uncurry_product _ _ _
theorem sups_assoc : s ⊻ t ⊻ u = s ⊻ (t ⊻ u) := image₂_assoc sup_assoc
theorem sups_comm : s ⊻ t = t ⊻ s := image₂_comm sup_comm
theorem sups_left_comm : s ⊻ (t ⊻ u) = t ⊻ (s ⊻ u) :=
image₂_left_comm sup_left_comm
theorem sups_right_comm : s ⊻ t ⊻ u = s ⊻ u ⊻ t :=
image₂_right_comm sup_right_comm
theorem sups_sups_sups_comm : s ⊻ t ⊻ (u ⊻ v) = s ⊻ u ⊻ (t ⊻ v) :=
image₂_image₂_image₂_comm sup_sup_sup_comm
end Sups
section Infs
variable [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β]
variable [SemilatticeInf α] [SemilatticeInf β] [FunLike F α β] [InfHomClass F α β]
variable (s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u v : Finset α)
/-- `s ⊼ t` is the finset of elements of the form `a ⊓ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`. -/
protected def hasInfs : HasInfs (Finset α) :=
⟨image₂ (· ⊓ ·)⟩
scoped[FinsetFamily] attribute [instance] Finset.hasInfs
open FinsetFamily
variable {s t} {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem mem_infs : c ∈ s ⊼ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, ∃ b ∈ t, a ⊓ b = c := by simp [(· ⊼ ·)]
variable (s t)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_infs : (↑(s ⊼ t) : Set α) = ↑s ⊼ ↑t :=
coe_image₂ _ _ _
theorem card_infs_le : #(s ⊼ t) ≤ #s * #t := card_image₂_le _ _ _
theorem card_infs_iff : #(s ⊼ t) = #s * #t ↔ (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × α)).InjOn fun x => x.1 ⊓ x.2 :=
card_image₂_iff
variable {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u}
theorem inf_mem_infs : a ∈ s → b ∈ t → a ⊓ b ∈ s ⊼ t :=
mem_image₂_of_mem
theorem infs_subset : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s₁ ⊼ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ⊼ t₂ :=
image₂_subset
theorem infs_subset_left : t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s ⊼ t₁ ⊆ s ⊼ t₂ :=
image₂_subset_left
theorem infs_subset_right : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₁ ⊼ t ⊆ s₂ ⊼ t :=
image₂_subset_right
lemma image_subset_infs_left : b ∈ t → s.image (· ⊓ b) ⊆ s ⊼ t := image_subset_image₂_left
lemma image_subset_infs_right : a ∈ s → t.image (a ⊓ ·) ⊆ s ⊼ t := image_subset_image₂_right
theorem forall_infs_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∀ c ∈ s ⊼ t, p c) ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, p (a ⊓ b) :=
forall_mem_image₂
@[simp]
theorem infs_subset_iff : s ⊼ t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, a ⊓ b ∈ u :=
image₂_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem infs_nonempty : (s ⊼ t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty :=
image₂_nonempty_iff
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected theorem Nonempty.infs : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty → (s ⊼ t).Nonempty :=
Nonempty.image₂
theorem Nonempty.of_infs_left : (s ⊼ t).Nonempty → s.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_image₂_left
theorem Nonempty.of_infs_right : (s ⊼ t).Nonempty → t.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_image₂_right
@[simp]
theorem empty_infs : ∅ ⊼ t = ∅ :=
image₂_empty_left
@[simp]
theorem infs_empty : s ⊼ ∅ = ∅ :=
image₂_empty_right
@[simp]
theorem infs_eq_empty : s ⊼ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ :=
image₂_eq_empty_iff
@[simp] lemma singleton_infs : {a} ⊼ t = t.image (a ⊓ ·) := image₂_singleton_left
@[simp] lemma infs_singleton : s ⊼ {b} = s.image (· ⊓ b) := image₂_singleton_right
theorem singleton_infs_singleton : ({a} ⊼ {b} : Finset α) = {a ⊓ b} :=
image₂_singleton
theorem infs_union_left : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ⊼ t = s₁ ⊼ t ∪ s₂ ⊼ t :=
image₂_union_left
theorem infs_union_right : s ⊼ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s ⊼ t₁ ∪ s ⊼ t₂ :=
image₂_union_right
theorem infs_inter_subset_left : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ⊼ t ⊆ s₁ ⊼ t ∩ s₂ ⊼ t :=
image₂_inter_subset_left
theorem infs_inter_subset_right : s ⊼ (t₁ ∩ t₂) ⊆ s ⊼ t₁ ∩ s ⊼ t₂ :=
image₂_inter_subset_right
theorem subset_infs {s t : Set α} :
↑u ⊆ s ⊼ t → ∃ s' t' : Finset α, ↑s' ⊆ s ∧ ↑t' ⊆ t ∧ u ⊆ s' ⊼ t' :=
subset_set_image₂
lemma image_infs (f : F) (s t : Finset α) : image f (s ⊼ t) = image f s ⊼ image f t :=
image_image₂_distrib <| map_inf f
lemma map_infs (f : F) (hf) (s t : Finset α) :
map ⟨f, hf⟩ (s ⊼ t) = map ⟨f, hf⟩ s ⊼ map ⟨f, hf⟩ t := by
simpa [map_eq_image] using image_infs f s t
lemma subset_infs_self : s ⊆ s ⊼ s := fun _a ha ↦ mem_infs.2 ⟨_, ha, _, ha, inf_idem _⟩
lemma infs_self_subset : s ⊼ s ⊆ s ↔ InfClosed (s : Set α) := infs_subset_iff
@[simp] lemma infs_self : s ⊼ s = s ↔ InfClosed (s : Set α) := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp] lemma univ_infs_univ [Fintype α] : (univ : Finset α) ⊼ univ = univ := by simp
lemma filter_infs_le [DecidableLE α] (s t : Finset α) (a : α) :
{b ∈ s ⊼ t | a ≤ b} = {b ∈ s | a ≤ b} ⊼ {b ∈ t | a ≤ b} := by
simp only [← coe_inj, coe_filter, coe_infs, ← mem_coe, Set.sep_infs_le]
variable (s t u)
lemma biUnion_image_inf_left : s.biUnion (fun a ↦ t.image (a ⊓ ·)) = s ⊼ t := biUnion_image_left
lemma biUnion_image_inf_right : t.biUnion (fun b ↦ s.image (· ⊓ b)) = s ⊼ t := biUnion_image_right
theorem image_inf_product (s t : Finset α) : (s ×ˢ t).image (uncurry (· ⊓ ·)) = s ⊼ t :=
image_uncurry_product _ _ _
theorem infs_assoc : s ⊼ t ⊼ u = s ⊼ (t ⊼ u) := image₂_assoc inf_assoc
theorem infs_comm : s ⊼ t = t ⊼ s := image₂_comm inf_comm
theorem infs_left_comm : s ⊼ (t ⊼ u) = t ⊼ (s ⊼ u) :=
image₂_left_comm inf_left_comm
theorem infs_right_comm : s ⊼ t ⊼ u = s ⊼ u ⊼ t :=
image₂_right_comm inf_right_comm
theorem infs_infs_infs_comm : s ⊼ t ⊼ (u ⊼ v) = s ⊼ u ⊼ (t ⊼ v) :=
image₂_image₂_image₂_comm inf_inf_inf_comm
end Infs
open FinsetFamily
section DistribLattice
variable [DecidableEq α]
variable [DistribLattice α] (s t u : Finset α)
theorem sups_infs_subset_left : s ⊻ t ⊼ u ⊆ (s ⊻ t) ⊼ (s ⊻ u) :=
image₂_distrib_subset_left sup_inf_left
theorem sups_infs_subset_right : t ⊼ u ⊻ s ⊆ (t ⊻ s) ⊼ (u ⊻ s) :=
image₂_distrib_subset_right sup_inf_right
theorem infs_sups_subset_left : s ⊼ (t ⊻ u) ⊆ s ⊼ t ⊻ s ⊼ u :=
image₂_distrib_subset_left inf_sup_left
theorem infs_sups_subset_right : (t ⊻ u) ⊼ s ⊆ t ⊼ s ⊻ u ⊼ s :=
image₂_distrib_subset_right inf_sup_right
end DistribLattice
section Finset
variable [DecidableEq α]
variable {𝒜 ℬ : Finset (Finset α)} {s t : Finset α}
@[simp] lemma powerset_union (s t : Finset α) : (s ∪ t).powerset = s.powerset ⊻ t.powerset := by
ext u
simp only [mem_sups, mem_powerset, le_eq_subset, sup_eq_union]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨_, inter_subset_left (s₂ := u), _, inter_subset_left (s₂ := u), ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rwa [← union_inter_distrib_right, inter_eq_right]
· rintro ⟨v, hv, w, hw, rfl⟩
exact union_subset_union hv hw
@[simp] lemma powerset_inter (s t : Finset α) : (s ∩ t).powerset = s.powerset ⊼ t.powerset := by
ext u
simp only [mem_infs, mem_powerset, le_eq_subset, inf_eq_inter]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨_, inter_subset_left (s₂ := u), _, inter_subset_left (s₂ := u), ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rwa [← inter_inter_distrib_right, inter_eq_right]
· rintro ⟨v, hv, w, hw, rfl⟩
exact inter_subset_inter hv hw
@[simp] lemma powerset_sups_powerset_self (s : Finset α) :
s.powerset ⊻ s.powerset = s.powerset := by simp [← powerset_union]
@[simp] lemma powerset_infs_powerset_self (s : Finset α) :
s.powerset ⊼ s.powerset = s.powerset := by simp [← powerset_inter]
lemma union_mem_sups : s ∈ 𝒜 → t ∈ ℬ → s ∪ t ∈ 𝒜 ⊻ ℬ := sup_mem_sups
lemma inter_mem_infs : s ∈ 𝒜 → t ∈ ℬ → s ∩ t ∈ 𝒜 ⊼ ℬ := inf_mem_infs
end Finset
section DisjSups
variable [DecidableEq α]
variable [SemilatticeSup α] [OrderBot α] [DecidableRel (α := α) Disjoint]
(s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u : Finset α)
/-- The finset of elements of the form `a ⊔ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t` and `a` and `b` are disjoint.
-/
def disjSups : Finset α := {ab ∈ s ×ˢ t | Disjoint ab.1 ab.2}.image fun ab => ab.1 ⊔ ab.2
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[FinsetFamily] infixl:74 " ○ " => Finset.disjSups
open FinsetFamily
variable {s t u} {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem mem_disjSups : c ∈ s ○ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, ∃ b ∈ t, Disjoint a b ∧ a ⊔ b = c := by
simp [disjSups, and_assoc]
theorem disjSups_subset_sups : s ○ t ⊆ s ⊻ t := by
simp_rw [subset_iff, mem_sups, mem_disjSups]
exact fun c ⟨a, b, ha, hb, _, hc⟩ => ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hc⟩
variable (s t)
theorem card_disjSups_le : #(s ○ t) ≤ #s * #t :=
(card_le_card disjSups_subset_sups).trans <| card_sups_le _ _
variable {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂}
theorem disjSups_subset (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s₁ ○ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ○ t₂ :=
image_subset_image <| filter_subset_filter _ <| product_subset_product hs ht
theorem disjSups_subset_left (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s ○ t₁ ⊆ s ○ t₂ :=
disjSups_subset Subset.rfl ht
theorem disjSups_subset_right (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ○ t ⊆ s₂ ○ t :=
disjSups_subset hs Subset.rfl
theorem forall_disjSups_iff {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ c ∈ s ○ t, p c) ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, Disjoint a b → p (a ⊔ b) := by
simp_rw [mem_disjSups]
refine ⟨fun h a ha b hb hab => h _ ⟨_, ha, _, hb, hab, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
rintro h _ ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab, rfl⟩
exact h _ ha _ hb hab
@[simp]
theorem disjSups_subset_iff : s ○ t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, Disjoint a b → a ⊔ b ∈ u :=
forall_disjSups_iff
theorem Nonempty.of_disjSups_left : (s ○ t).Nonempty → s.Nonempty := by
simp_rw [Finset.Nonempty, mem_disjSups]
exact fun ⟨_, a, ha, _⟩ => ⟨a, ha⟩
theorem Nonempty.of_disjSups_right : (s ○ t).Nonempty → t.Nonempty := by
simp_rw [Finset.Nonempty, mem_disjSups]
exact fun ⟨_, _, _, b, hb, _⟩ => ⟨b, hb⟩
@[simp]
theorem disjSups_empty_left : ∅ ○ t = ∅ := by simp [disjSups]
@[simp]
theorem disjSups_empty_right : s ○ ∅ = ∅ := by simp [disjSups]
theorem disjSups_singleton : ({a} ○ {b} : Finset α) = if Disjoint a b then {a ⊔ b} else ∅ := by
split_ifs with h <;> simp [disjSups, filter_singleton, h]
theorem disjSups_union_left : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ○ t = s₁ ○ t ∪ s₂ ○ t := by
simp [disjSups, filter_union, image_union]
theorem disjSups_union_right : s ○ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s ○ t₁ ∪ s ○ t₂ := by
simp [disjSups, filter_union, image_union]
theorem disjSups_inter_subset_left : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ○ t ⊆ s₁ ○ t ∩ s₂ ○ t := by
simpa only [disjSups, inter_product, filter_inter_distrib] using image_inter_subset _ _ _
theorem disjSups_inter_subset_right : s ○ (t₁ ∩ t₂) ⊆ s ○ t₁ ∩ s ○ t₂ := by
simpa only [disjSups, product_inter, filter_inter_distrib] using image_inter_subset _ _ _
variable (s t)
theorem disjSups_comm : s ○ t = t ○ s := by
aesop (add simp disjoint_comm, simp sup_comm)
instance : @Std.Commutative (Finset α) (· ○ ·) := ⟨disjSups_comm⟩
end DisjSups
open FinsetFamily
section DistribLattice
variable [DecidableEq α]
variable [DistribLattice α] [OrderBot α] [DecidableRel (α := α) Disjoint] (s t u v : Finset α)
theorem disjSups_assoc : ∀ s t u : Finset α, s ○ t ○ u = s ○ (t ○ u) := by
refine (associative_of_commutative_of_le inferInstance ?_).assoc
simp only [le_eq_subset, disjSups_subset_iff, mem_disjSups]
rintro s t u _ ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab, rfl⟩ c hc habc
rw [disjoint_sup_left] at habc
exact ⟨a, ha, _, ⟨b, hb, c, hc, habc.2, rfl⟩, hab.sup_right habc.1, (sup_assoc ..).symm⟩
instance : @Std.Associative (Finset α) (· ○ ·) := ⟨disjSups_assoc⟩
theorem disjSups_left_comm : s ○ (t ○ u) = t ○ (s ○ u) := by
simp_rw [← disjSups_assoc, disjSups_comm s]
theorem disjSups_right_comm : s ○ t ○ u = s ○ u ○ t := by simp_rw [disjSups_assoc, disjSups_comm]
theorem disjSups_disjSups_disjSups_comm : s ○ t ○ (u ○ v) = s ○ u ○ (t ○ v) := by
simp_rw [← disjSups_assoc, disjSups_right_comm]
end DistribLattice
section Diffs
variable [DecidableEq α]
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] (s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u : Finset α)
/-- `s \\ t` is the finset of elements of the form `a \ b` where `a ∈ s`, `b ∈ t`. -/
def diffs : Finset α → Finset α → Finset α := image₂ (· \ ·)
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[FinsetFamily] infixl:74 " \\\\ " => Finset.diffs
-- This notation is meant to have higher precedence than `\` and `⊓`, but still within the
-- realm of other binary notation
open FinsetFamily
variable {s t} {a b c : α}
@[simp] lemma mem_diffs : c ∈ s \\ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, ∃ b ∈ t, a \ b = c := by simp [(· \\ ·)]
variable (s t)
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_diffs : (↑(s \\ t) : Set α) = Set.image2 (· \ ·) s t :=
coe_image₂ _ _ _
lemma card_diffs_le : #(s \\ t) ≤ #s * #t := card_image₂_le _ _ _
lemma card_diffs_iff : #(s \\ t) = #s * #t ↔ (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × α)).InjOn fun x ↦ x.1 \ x.2 :=
card_image₂_iff
variable {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u}
lemma sdiff_mem_diffs : a ∈ s → b ∈ t → a \ b ∈ s \\ t := mem_image₂_of_mem
lemma diffs_subset : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s₁ \\ t₁ ⊆ s₂ \\ t₂ := image₂_subset
lemma diffs_subset_left : t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s \\ t₁ ⊆ s \\ t₂ := image₂_subset_left
lemma diffs_subset_right : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₁ \\ t ⊆ s₂ \\ t := image₂_subset_right
lemma image_subset_diffs_left : b ∈ t → s.image (· \ b) ⊆ s \\ t := image_subset_image₂_left
lemma image_subset_diffs_right : a ∈ s → t.image (a \ ·) ⊆ s \\ t := image_subset_image₂_right
lemma forall_mem_diffs {p : α → Prop} : (∀ c ∈ s \\ t, p c) ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, p (a \ b) :=
forall_mem_image₂
@[simp] lemma diffs_subset_iff : s \\ t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, a \ b ∈ u := image₂_subset_iff
@[simp]
lemma diffs_nonempty : (s \\ t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty := image₂_nonempty_iff
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected lemma Nonempty.diffs : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty → (s \\ t).Nonempty := Nonempty.image₂
lemma Nonempty.of_diffs_left : (s \\ t).Nonempty → s.Nonempty := Nonempty.of_image₂_left
lemma Nonempty.of_diffs_right : (s \\ t).Nonempty → t.Nonempty := Nonempty.of_image₂_right
@[simp] lemma empty_diffs : ∅ \\ t = ∅ := image₂_empty_left
@[simp] lemma diffs_empty : s \\ ∅ = ∅ := image₂_empty_right
@[simp] lemma diffs_eq_empty : s \\ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := image₂_eq_empty_iff
@[simp] lemma singleton_diffs : {a} \\ t = t.image (a \ ·) := image₂_singleton_left
@[simp] lemma diffs_singleton : s \\ {b} = s.image (· \ b) := image₂_singleton_right
lemma singleton_diffs_singleton : ({a} \\ {b} : Finset α) = {a \ b} := image₂_singleton
lemma diffs_union_left : (s₁ ∪ s₂) \\ t = s₁ \\ t ∪ s₂ \\ t := image₂_union_left
lemma diffs_union_right : s \\ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s \\ t₁ ∪ s \\ t₂ := image₂_union_right
lemma diffs_inter_subset_left : (s₁ ∩ s₂) \\ t ⊆ s₁ \\ t ∩ s₂ \\ t := image₂_inter_subset_left
lemma diffs_inter_subset_right : s \\ (t₁ ∩ t₂) ⊆ s \\ t₁ ∩ s \\ t₂ := image₂_inter_subset_right
lemma subset_diffs {s t : Set α} :
↑u ⊆ Set.image2 (· \ ·) s t → ∃ s' t' : Finset α, ↑s' ⊆ s ∧ ↑t' ⊆ t ∧ u ⊆ s' \\ t' :=
subset_set_image₂
variable (s t u)
lemma biUnion_image_sdiff_left : s.biUnion (fun a ↦ t.image (a \ ·)) = s \\ t := biUnion_image_left
lemma biUnion_image_sdiff_right : t.biUnion (fun b ↦ s.image (· \ b)) = s \\ t :=
biUnion_image_right
lemma image_sdiff_product (s t : Finset α) : (s ×ˢ t).image (uncurry (· \ ·)) = s \\ t :=
image_uncurry_product _ _ _
lemma diffs_right_comm : s \\ t \\ u = s \\ u \\ t := image₂_right_comm sdiff_right_comm
end Diffs
section Compls
variable [BooleanAlgebra α] (s s₁ s₂ t : Finset α)
/-- `sᶜˢ` is the finset of elements of the form `aᶜ` where `a ∈ s`. -/
def compls : Finset α → Finset α := map ⟨compl, compl_injective⟩
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[FinsetFamily] postfix:max "ᶜˢ" => Finset.compls
open FinsetFamily
variable {s t} {a : α}
@[simp] lemma mem_compls : a ∈ sᶜˢ ↔ aᶜ ∈ s := by
rw [Iff.comm, ← mem_map' ⟨compl, compl_injective⟩, Embedding.coeFn_mk, compl_compl, compls]
variable (s t)
@[simp] lemma image_compl [DecidableEq α] : s.image compl = sᶜˢ := by simp [compls, map_eq_image]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_compls : (↑sᶜˢ : Set α) = compl '' ↑s := coe_map _ _
@[simp] lemma card_compls : #sᶜˢ = #s := card_map _
variable {s s₁ s₂ t}
lemma compl_mem_compls : a ∈ s → aᶜ ∈ sᶜˢ := mem_map_of_mem _
@[simp] lemma compls_subset_compls : s₁ᶜˢ ⊆ s₂ᶜˢ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ := map_subset_map
lemma forall_mem_compls {p : α → Prop} : (∀ a ∈ sᶜˢ, p a) ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, p aᶜ := forall_mem_map
lemma exists_compls_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∃ a ∈ sᶜˢ, p a) ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, p aᶜ := by aesop
@[simp] lemma compls_compls (s : Finset α) : sᶜˢᶜˢ = s := by ext; simp
lemma compls_subset_iff : sᶜˢ ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ tᶜˢ := by rw [← compls_subset_compls, compls_compls]
@[simp]
lemma compls_nonempty : sᶜˢ.Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty := map_nonempty
protected alias ⟨Nonempty.of_compls, Nonempty.compls⟩ := compls_nonempty
attribute [aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])] Nonempty.compls
@[simp] lemma compls_empty : (∅ : Finset α)ᶜˢ = ∅ := map_empty _
@[simp] lemma compls_eq_empty : sᶜˢ = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := map_eq_empty
@[simp] lemma compls_singleton (a : α) : {a}ᶜˢ = {aᶜ} := map_singleton _ _
@[simp] lemma compls_univ [Fintype α] : (univ : Finset α)ᶜˢ = univ := by ext; simp
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp] lemma compls_union (s t : Finset α) : (s ∪ t)ᶜˢ = sᶜˢ ∪ tᶜˢ := map_union _ _
@[simp] lemma compls_inter (s t : Finset α) : (s ∩ t)ᶜˢ = sᶜˢ ∩ tᶜˢ := map_inter _ _
@[simp] lemma compls_infs (s t : Finset α) : (s ⊼ t)ᶜˢ = sᶜˢ ⊻ tᶜˢ := by
simp_rw [← image_compl]; exact image_image₂_distrib fun _ _ ↦ compl_inf
@[simp] lemma compls_sups (s t : Finset α) : (s ⊻ t)ᶜˢ = sᶜˢ ⊼ tᶜˢ := by
simp_rw [← image_compl]; exact image_image₂_distrib fun _ _ ↦ compl_sup
@[simp] lemma infs_compls_eq_diffs (s t : Finset α) : s ⊼ tᶜˢ = s \\ t := by
ext; simp [sdiff_eq]; aesop
@[simp] lemma compls_infs_eq_diffs (s t : Finset α) : sᶜˢ ⊼ t = t \\ s := by
rw [infs_comm, infs_compls_eq_diffs]
@[simp] lemma diffs_compls_eq_infs (s t : Finset α) : s \\ tᶜˢ = s ⊼ t := by
rw [← infs_compls_eq_diffs, compls_compls]
variable {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] {𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)} {n : ℕ}
protected lemma _root_.Set.Sized.compls (h𝒜 : (𝒜 : Set (Finset α)).Sized n) :
(𝒜ᶜˢ : Set (Finset α)).Sized (Fintype.card α - n) :=
Finset.forall_mem_compls.2 <| fun s hs ↦ by rw [Finset.card_compl, h𝒜 hs]
lemma sized_compls (hn : n ≤ Fintype.card α) :
(𝒜ᶜˢ : Set (Finset α)).Sized n ↔ (𝒜 : Set (Finset α)).Sized (Fintype.card α - n) where
mp h𝒜 := by simpa using h𝒜.compls
mpr h𝒜 := by simpa only [Nat.sub_sub_self hn] using h𝒜.compls
end Compls
end Finset
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Sups.lean | 712 | 712 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.BoxIntegral.Partition.Basic
/-!
# Split a box along one or more hyperplanes
## Main definitions
A hyperplane `{x : ι → ℝ | x i = a}` splits a rectangular box `I : BoxIntegral.Box ι` into two
smaller boxes. If `a ∉ Ioo (I.lower i, I.upper i)`, then one of these boxes is empty, so it is not a
box in the sense of `BoxIntegral.Box`.
We introduce the following definitions.
* `BoxIntegral.Box.splitLower I i a` and `BoxIntegral.Box.splitUpper I i a` are these boxes (as
`WithBot (BoxIntegral.Box ι)`);
* `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.split I i a` is the partition of `I` made of these two boxes (or of one
box `I` if one of these boxes is empty);
* `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.splitMany I s`, where `s : Finset (ι × ℝ)` is a finite set of
hyperplanes `{x : ι → ℝ | x i = a}` encoded as pairs `(i, a)`, is the partition of `I` made by
cutting it along all the hyperplanes in `s`.
## Main results
The main result `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.exists_iUnion_eq_diff` says that any prepartition `π` of
`I` admits a prepartition `π'` of `I` that covers exactly `I \ π.iUnion`. One of these prepartitions
is available as `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.compl`.
## Tags
rectangular box, partition, hyperplane
-/
noncomputable section
open Function Set Filter
namespace BoxIntegral
variable {ι M : Type*} {n : ℕ}
namespace Box
variable {I : Box ι} {i : ι} {x : ℝ} {y : ι → ℝ}
open scoped Classical in
/-- Given a box `I` and `x ∈ (I.lower i, I.upper i)`, the hyperplane `{y : ι → ℝ | y i = x}` splits
`I` into two boxes. `BoxIntegral.Box.splitLower I i x` is the box `I ∩ {y | y i ≤ x}`
(if it is nonempty). As usual, we represent a box that may be empty as
`WithBot (BoxIntegral.Box ι)`. -/
def splitLower (I : Box ι) (i : ι) (x : ℝ) : WithBot (Box ι) :=
mk' I.lower (update I.upper i (min x (I.upper i)))
@[simp]
theorem coe_splitLower : (splitLower I i x : Set (ι → ℝ)) = ↑I ∩ { y | y i ≤ x } := by
rw [splitLower, coe_mk']
ext y
simp only [mem_univ_pi, mem_Ioc, mem_inter_iff, mem_coe, mem_setOf_eq, forall_and, ← Pi.le_def,
le_update_iff, le_min_iff, and_assoc, and_forall_ne (p := fun j => y j ≤ upper I j) i, mem_def]
rw [and_comm (a := y i ≤ x)]
theorem splitLower_le : I.splitLower i x ≤ I :=
withBotCoe_subset_iff.1 <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem splitLower_eq_bot {i x} : I.splitLower i x = ⊥ ↔ x ≤ I.lower i := by
classical
rw [splitLower, mk'_eq_bot, exists_update_iff I.upper fun j y => y ≤ I.lower j]
simp [(I.lower_lt_upper _).not_le]
@[simp]
theorem splitLower_eq_self : I.splitLower i x = I ↔ I.upper i ≤ x := by
simp [splitLower, update_eq_iff]
|
theorem splitLower_def [DecidableEq ι] {i x} (h : x ∈ Ioo (I.lower i) (I.upper i))
(h' : ∀ j, I.lower j < update I.upper i x j :=
| Mathlib/Analysis/BoxIntegral/Partition/Split.lean | 78 | 80 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Algebra
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Convex
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.LinearMap.Rat
import Mathlib.Tactic.Module
/-!
# Inner product space derived from a norm
This file defines an `InnerProductSpace` instance from a norm that respects the
parallellogram identity. The parallelogram identity is a way to express the inner product of `x` and
`y` in terms of the norms of `x`, `y`, `x + y`, `x - y`.
## Main results
- `InnerProductSpace.ofNorm`: a normed space whose norm respects the parallellogram identity,
can be seen as an inner product space.
## Implementation notes
We define `inner_`
$$\langle x, y \rangle := \frac{1}{4} (‖x + y‖^2 - ‖x - y‖^2 + i ‖ix + y‖ ^ 2 - i ‖ix - y‖^2)$$
and use the parallelogram identity
$$‖x + y‖^2 + ‖x - y‖^2 = 2 (‖x‖^2 + ‖y‖^2)$$
to prove it is an inner product, i.e., that it is conjugate-symmetric (`inner_.conj_symm`) and
linear in the first argument. `add_left` is proved by judicious application of the parallelogram
identity followed by tedious arithmetic. `smul_left` is proved step by step, first noting that
$\langle λ x, y \rangle = λ \langle x, y \rangle$ for $λ ∈ ℕ$, $λ = -1$, hence $λ ∈ ℤ$ and $λ ∈ ℚ$
by arithmetic. Then by continuity and the fact that ℚ is dense in ℝ, the same is true for ℝ.
The case of ℂ then follows by applying the result for ℝ and more arithmetic.
## TODO
Move upstream to `Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Basic`.
## References
- [Jordan, P. and von Neumann, J., *On inner products in linear, metric spaces*][Jordan1935]
- https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/21792/norms-induced-by-inner-products-and-the-parallelogram-law
- https://math.dartmouth.edu/archive/m113w10/public_html/jordan-vneumann-thm.pdf
## Tags
inner product space, Hilbert space, norm
-/
open RCLike
open scoped ComplexConjugate
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] (E : Type*) [NormedAddCommGroup E]
/-- Predicate for the parallelogram identity to hold in a normed group. This is a scalar-less
version of `InnerProductSpace`. If you have an `InnerProductSpaceable` assumption, you can
locally upgrade that to `InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E` using `casesI nonempty_innerProductSpace 𝕜 E`.
-/
class InnerProductSpaceable : Prop where
parallelogram_identity :
∀ x y : E, ‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ + ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = 2 * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖)
variable (𝕜) {E}
theorem InnerProductSpace.toInnerProductSpaceable [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] :
InnerProductSpaceable E :=
⟨parallelogram_law_with_norm 𝕜⟩
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) InnerProductSpace.toInnerProductSpaceable_ofReal
[InnerProductSpace ℝ E] : InnerProductSpaceable E :=
⟨parallelogram_law_with_norm ℝ⟩
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
local notation "𝓚" => algebraMap ℝ 𝕜
/-- Auxiliary definition of the inner product derived from the norm. -/
private noncomputable def inner_ (x y : E) : 𝕜 :=
4⁻¹ * (𝓚 ‖x + y‖ * 𝓚 ‖x + y‖ - 𝓚 ‖x - y‖ * 𝓚 ‖x - y‖ +
(I : 𝕜) * 𝓚 ‖(I : 𝕜) • x + y‖ * 𝓚 ‖(I : 𝕜) • x + y‖ -
(I : 𝕜) * 𝓚 ‖(I : 𝕜) • x - y‖ * 𝓚 ‖(I : 𝕜) • x - y‖)
namespace InnerProductSpaceable
variable {𝕜} (E)
-- This has a prime added to avoid clashing with public `innerProp`
/-- Auxiliary definition for the `add_left` property. -/
private def innerProp' (r : 𝕜) : Prop :=
∀ x y : E, inner_ 𝕜 (r • x) y = conj r * inner_ 𝕜 x y
variable {E}
theorem _root_.Continuous.inner_ {f g : ℝ → E} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) :
Continuous fun x => inner_ 𝕜 (f x) (g x) := by
unfold _root_.inner_
fun_prop
theorem inner_.norm_sq (x : E) : ‖x‖ ^ 2 = re (inner_ 𝕜 x x) := by
simp only [inner_, normSq_apply, ofNat_re, ofNat_im, map_sub, map_add, map_zero, map_mul,
ofReal_re, ofReal_im, mul_re, inv_re, mul_im, I_re, inv_im]
have h₁ : ‖x - x‖ = 0 := by simp
have h₂ : ‖x + x‖ = 2 • ‖x‖ := by convert norm_nsmul 𝕜 2 x using 2; module
rw [h₁, h₂]
ring
theorem inner_.conj_symm (x y : E) : conj (inner_ 𝕜 y x) = inner_ 𝕜 x y := by
simp only [inner_, map_sub, map_add, map_mul, map_inv₀, map_ofNat, conj_ofReal, conj_I]
rw [add_comm y x, norm_sub_rev]
by_cases hI : (I : 𝕜) = 0
· simp only [hI, neg_zero, zero_mul]
have hI' := I_mul_I_of_nonzero hI
have I_smul (v : E) : ‖(I : 𝕜) • v‖ = ‖v‖ := by rw [norm_smul, norm_I_of_ne_zero hI, one_mul]
have h₁ : ‖(I : 𝕜) • y - x‖ = ‖(I : 𝕜) • x + y‖ := by
convert I_smul ((I : 𝕜) • x + y) using 2
linear_combination (norm := module) -hI' • x
have h₂ : ‖(I : 𝕜) • y + x‖ = ‖(I : 𝕜) • x - y‖ := by
convert (I_smul ((I : 𝕜) • y + x)).symm using 2
linear_combination (norm := module) -hI' • y
rw [h₁, h₂]
ring
variable [InnerProductSpaceable E]
private theorem add_left_aux1 (x y z : E) :
‖2 • x + y‖ * ‖2 • x + y‖ + ‖2 • z + y‖ * ‖2 • z + y‖
= 2 * (‖x + y + z‖ * ‖x + y + z‖ + ‖x - z‖ * ‖x - z‖) := by
convert parallelogram_identity (x + y + z) (x - z) using 4 <;> abel
private theorem add_left_aux2 (x y z : E) : ‖2 • x + y‖ * ‖2 • x + y‖ + ‖y - 2 • z‖ * ‖y - 2 • z‖
= 2 * (‖x + y - z‖ * ‖x + y - z‖ + ‖x + z‖ * ‖x + z‖) := by
convert parallelogram_identity (x + y - z) (x + z) using 4 <;> abel
private theorem add_left_aux3 (y z : E) :
‖2 • z + y‖ * ‖2 • z + y‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ = 2 * (‖y + z‖ * ‖y + z‖ + ‖z‖ * ‖z‖) := by
convert parallelogram_identity (y + z) z using 4 <;> abel
private theorem add_left_aux4 (y z : E) :
‖y‖ * ‖y‖ + ‖y - 2 • z‖ * ‖y - 2 • z‖ = 2 * (‖y - z‖ * ‖y - z‖ + ‖z‖ * ‖z‖) := by
convert parallelogram_identity (y - z) z using 4 <;> abel
variable (𝕜)
private theorem add_left_aux5 (x y z : E) :
‖(I : 𝕜) • (2 • x + y)‖ * ‖(I : 𝕜) • (2 • x + y)‖
+ ‖(I : 𝕜) • y + 2 • z‖ * ‖(I : 𝕜) • y + 2 • z‖
= 2 * (‖(I : 𝕜) • (x + y) + z‖ * ‖(I : 𝕜) • (x + y) + z‖
+ ‖(I : 𝕜) • x - z‖ * ‖(I : 𝕜) • x - z‖) := by
convert parallelogram_identity ((I : 𝕜) • (x + y) + z) ((I : 𝕜) • x - z) using 4 <;> module
private theorem add_left_aux6 (x y z : E) :
(‖(I : 𝕜) • (2 • x + y)‖ * ‖(I : 𝕜) • (2 • x + y)‖ +
‖(I : 𝕜) • y - 2 • z‖ * ‖(I : 𝕜) • y - 2 • z‖)
= 2 * (‖(I : 𝕜) • (x + y) - z‖ * ‖(I : 𝕜) • (x + y) - z‖ +
‖(I : 𝕜) • x + z‖ * ‖(I : 𝕜) • x + z‖) := by
convert parallelogram_identity ((I : 𝕜) • (x + y) - z) ((I : 𝕜) • x + z) using 4 <;> module
private theorem add_left_aux7 (y z : E) :
‖(I : 𝕜) • y + 2 • z‖ * ‖(I : 𝕜) • y + 2 • z‖ + ‖(I : 𝕜) • y‖ * ‖(I : 𝕜) • y‖ =
2 * (‖(I : 𝕜) • y + z‖ * ‖(I : 𝕜) • y + z‖ + ‖z‖ * ‖z‖) := by
convert parallelogram_identity ((I : 𝕜) • y + z) z using 4 <;> module
private theorem add_left_aux8 (y z : E) :
‖(I : 𝕜) • y‖ * ‖(I : 𝕜) • y‖ + ‖(I : 𝕜) • y - 2 • z‖ * ‖(I : 𝕜) • y - 2 • z‖ =
2 * (‖(I : 𝕜) • y - z‖ * ‖(I : 𝕜) • y - z‖ + ‖z‖ * ‖z‖) := by
convert parallelogram_identity ((I : 𝕜) • y - z) z using 4 <;> module
| variable {𝕜}
theorem add_left (x y z : E) : inner_ 𝕜 (x + y) z = inner_ 𝕜 x z + inner_ 𝕜 y z := by
have H_re := congr(- $(add_left_aux1 x y z) + $(add_left_aux2 x y z)
+ $(add_left_aux3 y z) - $(add_left_aux4 y z))
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/OfNorm.lean | 176 | 180 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Jireh Loreaux. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jireh Loreaux
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.NonUnitalHom
import Mathlib.Data.Set.UnionLift
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Span.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.NonUnitalSubring.Basic
/-!
# Non-unital Subalgebras over Commutative Semirings
In this file we define `NonUnitalSubalgebra`s and the usual operations on them (`map`, `comap`).
## TODO
* once we have scalar actions by semigroups (as opposed to monoids), implement the action of a
non-unital subalgebra on the larger algebra.
-/
universe u u' v v' w w'
section NonUnitalSubalgebraClass
variable {S R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A]
variable [SetLike S A] [NonUnitalSubsemiringClass S A] [hSR : SMulMemClass S R A] (s : S)
namespace NonUnitalSubalgebraClass
/-- Embedding of a non-unital subalgebra into the non-unital algebra. -/
def subtype (s : S) : s →ₙₐ[R] A :=
{ NonUnitalSubsemiringClass.subtype s, SMulMemClass.subtype s with toFun := (↑) }
variable {s} in
@[simp]
lemma subtype_apply (x : s) : subtype s x = x := rfl
lemma subtype_injective :
Function.Injective (subtype s) :=
Subtype.coe_injective
@[simp]
theorem coe_subtype : (subtype s : s → A) = ((↑) : s → A) :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-18")]
alias coeSubtype := coe_subtype
end NonUnitalSubalgebraClass
end NonUnitalSubalgebraClass
/-- A non-unital subalgebra is a sub(semi)ring that is also a submodule. -/
structure NonUnitalSubalgebra (R : Type u) (A : Type v) [CommSemiring R]
[NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A] : Type v
extends NonUnitalSubsemiring A, Submodule R A
/-- Reinterpret a `NonUnitalSubalgebra` as a `NonUnitalSubsemiring`. -/
add_decl_doc NonUnitalSubalgebra.toNonUnitalSubsemiring
/-- Reinterpret a `NonUnitalSubalgebra` as a `Submodule`. -/
add_decl_doc NonUnitalSubalgebra.toSubmodule
namespace NonUnitalSubalgebra
variable {F : Type v'} {R' : Type u'} {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} {C : Type w'}
section NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring C]
variable [Module R A] [Module R B] [Module R C]
instance : SetLike (NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) A where
coe s := s.carrier
coe_injective' p q h := by cases p; cases q; congr; exact SetLike.coe_injective h
/-- The actual `NonUnitalSubalgebra` obtained from an element of a type satisfying
`NonUnitalSubsemiringClass` and `SMulMemClass`. -/
@[simps]
def ofClass {S R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A]
[SetLike S A] [NonUnitalSubsemiringClass S A] [SMulMemClass S R A]
(s : S) : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A where
carrier := s
add_mem' := add_mem
zero_mem' := zero_mem _
mul_mem' := mul_mem
smul_mem' := SMulMemClass.smul_mem
instance (priority := 100) : CanLift (Set A) (NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (↑)
(fun s ↦ 0 ∈ s ∧ (∀ {x y}, x ∈ s → y ∈ s → x + y ∈ s) ∧ (∀ {x y}, x ∈ s → y ∈ s → x * y ∈ s) ∧
∀ (r : R) {x}, x ∈ s → r • x ∈ s) where
prf s h :=
⟨ { carrier := s
zero_mem' := h.1
add_mem' := h.2.1
mul_mem' := h.2.2.1
smul_mem' := h.2.2.2 },
rfl ⟩
instance instNonUnitalSubsemiringClass :
NonUnitalSubsemiringClass (NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) A where
add_mem {s} := s.add_mem'
mul_mem {s} := s.mul_mem'
zero_mem {s} := s.zero_mem'
instance instSMulMemClass : SMulMemClass (NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) R A where
smul_mem := @fun s => s.smul_mem'
theorem mem_carrier {s : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {x : A} : x ∈ s.carrier ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
@[ext]
theorem ext {S T : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} (h : ∀ x : A, x ∈ S ↔ x ∈ T) : S = T :=
SetLike.ext h
@[simp]
theorem mem_toNonUnitalSubsemiring {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {x} :
x ∈ S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring ↔ x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toNonUnitalSubsemiring (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :
(↑S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring : Set A) = S :=
rfl
theorem toNonUnitalSubsemiring_injective :
Function.Injective
(toNonUnitalSubsemiring : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A → NonUnitalSubsemiring A) :=
fun S T h =>
ext fun x => by rw [← mem_toNonUnitalSubsemiring, ← mem_toNonUnitalSubsemiring, h]
theorem toNonUnitalSubsemiring_inj {S U : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} :
S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring = U.toNonUnitalSubsemiring ↔ S = U :=
toNonUnitalSubsemiring_injective.eq_iff
theorem mem_toSubmodule (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) {x} : x ∈ S.toSubmodule ↔ x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toSubmodule (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : (↑S.toSubmodule : Set A) = S :=
rfl
theorem toSubmodule_injective :
Function.Injective (toSubmodule : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A → Submodule R A) := fun S T h =>
ext fun x => by rw [← mem_toSubmodule, ← mem_toSubmodule, h]
theorem toSubmodule_inj {S U : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} : S.toSubmodule = U.toSubmodule ↔ S = U :=
toSubmodule_injective.eq_iff
/-- Copy of a non-unital subalgebra with a new `carrier` equal to the old one.
Useful to fix definitional equalities. -/
protected def copy (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (s : Set A) (hs : s = ↑S) :
NonUnitalSubalgebra R A :=
{ S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring.copy s hs with
smul_mem' := fun r a (ha : a ∈ s) => by
show r • a ∈ s
rw [hs] at ha ⊢
exact S.smul_mem' r ha }
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (s : Set A) (hs : s = ↑S) :
(S.copy s hs : Set A) = s :=
rfl
theorem copy_eq (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (s : Set A) (hs : s = ↑S) : S.copy s hs = S :=
SetLike.coe_injective hs
instance (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : Inhabited S :=
⟨(0 : S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring)⟩
end NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
section NonUnitalNonAssocRing
variable [CommRing R]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocRing A] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing B] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing C]
variable [Module R A] [Module R B] [Module R C]
instance instNonUnitalSubringClass : NonUnitalSubringClass (NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) A :=
{ NonUnitalSubalgebra.instNonUnitalSubsemiringClass with
neg_mem := @fun _ x hx => neg_one_smul R x ▸ SMulMemClass.smul_mem _ hx }
/-- A non-unital subalgebra over a ring is also a `Subring`. -/
def toNonUnitalSubring (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalSubring A where
toNonUnitalSubsemiring := S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring
neg_mem' := neg_mem (s := S)
@[simp]
theorem mem_toNonUnitalSubring {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {x} :
x ∈ S.toNonUnitalSubring ↔ x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toNonUnitalSubring (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :
(↑S.toNonUnitalSubring : Set A) = S :=
rfl
theorem toNonUnitalSubring_injective :
Function.Injective (toNonUnitalSubring : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A → NonUnitalSubring A) :=
fun S T h => ext fun x => by rw [← mem_toNonUnitalSubring, ← mem_toNonUnitalSubring, h]
theorem toNonUnitalSubring_inj {S U : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} :
S.toNonUnitalSubring = U.toNonUnitalSubring ↔ S = U :=
toNonUnitalSubring_injective.eq_iff
end NonUnitalNonAssocRing
section
/-! `NonUnitalSubalgebra`s inherit structure from their `NonUnitalSubsemiring` / `Semiring`
coercions. -/
instance toNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A]
(S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring S :=
inferInstance
instance toNonUnitalSemiring [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalSemiring A] [Module R A]
(S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalSemiring S :=
inferInstance
instance toNonUnitalCommSemiring [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalCommSemiring A] [Module R A]
(S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalCommSemiring S :=
inferInstance
instance toNonUnitalNonAssocRing [CommRing R] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing A] [Module R A]
(S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalNonAssocRing S :=
inferInstance
instance toNonUnitalRing [CommRing R] [NonUnitalRing A] [Module R A]
(S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalRing S :=
inferInstance
instance toNonUnitalCommRing [CommRing R] [NonUnitalCommRing A] [Module R A]
(S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalCommRing S :=
inferInstance
end
/-- The forgetful map from `NonUnitalSubalgebra` to `Submodule` as an `OrderEmbedding` -/
def toSubmodule' [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A] :
NonUnitalSubalgebra R A ↪o Submodule R A where
toEmbedding :=
{ toFun := fun S => S.toSubmodule
inj' := fun S T h => ext <| by apply SetLike.ext_iff.1 h }
map_rel_iff' := SetLike.coe_subset_coe.symm.trans SetLike.coe_subset_coe
/-- The forgetful map from `NonUnitalSubalgebra` to `NonUnitalSubsemiring` as an
`OrderEmbedding` -/
def toNonUnitalSubsemiring' [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A] :
NonUnitalSubalgebra R A ↪o NonUnitalSubsemiring A where
toEmbedding :=
{ toFun := fun S => S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring
inj' := fun S T h => ext <| by apply SetLike.ext_iff.1 h }
map_rel_iff' := SetLike.coe_subset_coe.symm.trans SetLike.coe_subset_coe
/-- The forgetful map from `NonUnitalSubalgebra` to `NonUnitalSubsemiring` as an
`OrderEmbedding` -/
def toNonUnitalSubring' [CommRing R] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing A] [Module R A] :
NonUnitalSubalgebra R A ↪o NonUnitalSubring A where
toEmbedding :=
{ toFun := fun S => S.toNonUnitalSubring
inj' := fun S T h => ext <| by apply SetLike.ext_iff.1 h }
map_rel_iff' := SetLike.coe_subset_coe.symm.trans SetLike.coe_subset_coe
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring C]
variable [Module R A] [Module R B] [Module R C]
variable {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A}
section
/-! ### `NonUnitalSubalgebra`s inherit structure from their `Submodule` coercions. -/
instance instModule' [Semiring R'] [SMul R' R] [Module R' A] [IsScalarTower R' R A] : Module R' S :=
SMulMemClass.toModule' _ R' R A S
instance instModule : Module R S :=
S.instModule'
instance instIsScalarTower' [Semiring R'] [SMul R' R] [Module R' A] [IsScalarTower R' R A] :
IsScalarTower R' R S :=
S.toSubmodule.isScalarTower
instance [IsScalarTower R A A] : IsScalarTower R S S where
smul_assoc r x y := Subtype.ext <| smul_assoc r (x : A) (y : A)
instance instSMulCommClass' [Semiring R'] [SMul R' R] [Module R' A] [IsScalarTower R' R A]
[SMulCommClass R' R A] : SMulCommClass R' R S where
smul_comm r' r s := Subtype.ext <| smul_comm r' r (s : A)
instance instSMulCommClass [SMulCommClass R A A] : SMulCommClass R S S where
smul_comm r x y := Subtype.ext <| smul_comm r (x : A) (y : A)
instance noZeroSMulDivisors_bot [NoZeroSMulDivisors R A] : NoZeroSMulDivisors R S :=
⟨fun {c x} h =>
have : c = 0 ∨ (x : A) = 0 := eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero (congr_arg ((↑) : S → A) h)
this.imp_right (@Subtype.ext_iff _ _ x 0).mpr⟩
end
protected theorem coe_add (x y : S) : (↑(x + y) : A) = ↑x + ↑y :=
rfl
protected theorem coe_mul (x y : S) : (↑(x * y) : A) = ↑x * ↑y :=
rfl
protected theorem coe_zero : ((0 : S) : A) = 0 :=
rfl
protected theorem coe_neg {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A]
{S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} (x : S) : (↑(-x) : A) = -↑x :=
rfl
protected theorem coe_sub {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A]
{S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} (x y : S) : (↑(x - y) : A) = ↑x - ↑y :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul [SMul R' R] [SMul R' A] [IsScalarTower R' R A] (r : R') (x : S) :
↑(r • x) = r • (x : A) :=
rfl
protected theorem coe_eq_zero {x : S} : (x : A) = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
ZeroMemClass.coe_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem toNonUnitalSubsemiring_subtype :
NonUnitalSubsemiringClass.subtype S = NonUnitalSubalgebraClass.subtype (R := R) S :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toSubring_subtype {R A : Type*} [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A]
(S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :
NonUnitalSubringClass.subtype S = NonUnitalSubalgebraClass.subtype (R := R) S :=
rfl
/-- Linear equivalence between `S : Submodule R A` and `S`. Though these types are equal,
we define it as a `LinearEquiv` to avoid type equalities. -/
def toSubmoduleEquiv (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : S.toSubmodule ≃ₗ[R] S :=
LinearEquiv.ofEq _ _ rfl
variable [FunLike F A B] [NonUnitalAlgHomClass F R A B]
/-- Transport a non-unital subalgebra via an algebra homomorphism. -/
def map (f : F) (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B :=
{ S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring.map (f : A →ₙ+* B) with
smul_mem' := fun r b hb => by
rcases hb with ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact map_smulₛₗ f r a ▸ Set.mem_image_of_mem f (S.smul_mem' r ha) }
theorem map_mono {S₁ S₂ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {f : F} :
S₁ ≤ S₂ → (map f S₁ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) ≤ map f S₂ :=
Set.image_subset f
theorem map_injective {f : F} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (map f : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A → NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) :=
fun _S₁ _S₂ ih =>
ext <| Set.ext_iff.1 <| Set.image_injective.2 hf <| Set.ext <| SetLike.ext_iff.mp ih
@[simp]
theorem map_id (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : map (NonUnitalAlgHom.id R A) S = S :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_id _
theorem map_map (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (g : B →ₙₐ[R] C) (f : A →ₙₐ[R] B) :
(S.map f).map g = S.map (g.comp f) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_image _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {f : F} {y : B} : y ∈ map f S ↔ ∃ x ∈ S, f x = y :=
NonUnitalSubsemiring.mem_map
theorem map_toSubmodule {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {f : F} :
-- TODO: introduce a better coercion from `NonUnitalAlgHomClass` to `LinearMap`
(map f S).toSubmodule = Submodule.map (LinearMapClass.linearMap f) S.toSubmodule :=
SetLike.coe_injective rfl
theorem map_toNonUnitalSubsemiring {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {f : F} :
(map f S).toNonUnitalSubsemiring = S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring.map (f : A →ₙ+* B) :=
SetLike.coe_injective rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_map (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (f : F) : (map f S : Set B) = f '' S :=
rfl
/-- Preimage of a non-unital subalgebra under an algebra homomorphism. -/
def comap (f : F) (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A :=
{ S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring.comap (f : A →ₙ+* B) with
smul_mem' := fun r a (ha : f a ∈ S) =>
show f (r • a) ∈ S from (map_smulₛₗ f r a).symm ▸ SMulMemClass.smul_mem r ha }
theorem map_le {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {f : F} {U : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B} :
map f S ≤ U ↔ S ≤ comap f U :=
Set.image_subset_iff
theorem gc_map_comap (f : F) :
GaloisConnection (map f : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A → NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) (comap f) :=
fun _ _ => map_le
@[simp]
theorem mem_comap (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) (f : F) (x : A) : x ∈ comap f S ↔ f x ∈ S :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_comap (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) (f : F) : (comap f S : Set A) = f ⁻¹' (S : Set B) :=
rfl
instance noZeroDivisors {R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalSemiring A] [NoZeroDivisors A]
[Module R A] (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : NoZeroDivisors S :=
NonUnitalSubsemiringClass.noZeroDivisors S
end NonUnitalSubalgebra
namespace Submodule
variable {R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A]
/-- A submodule closed under multiplication is a non-unital subalgebra. -/
def toNonUnitalSubalgebra (p : Submodule R A) (h_mul : ∀ x y, x ∈ p → y ∈ p → x * y ∈ p) :
NonUnitalSubalgebra R A :=
{ p with
mul_mem' := h_mul _ _ }
@[simp]
theorem mem_toNonUnitalSubalgebra {p : Submodule R A} {h_mul} {x} :
x ∈ p.toNonUnitalSubalgebra h_mul ↔ x ∈ p :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toNonUnitalSubalgebra (p : Submodule R A) (h_mul) :
(p.toNonUnitalSubalgebra h_mul : Set A) = p :=
rfl
theorem toNonUnitalSubalgebra_mk (p : Submodule R A) hmul :
p.toNonUnitalSubalgebra hmul =
NonUnitalSubalgebra.mk ⟨⟨⟨p, p.add_mem⟩, p.zero_mem⟩, hmul _ _⟩ p.smul_mem' :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toNonUnitalSubalgebra_toSubmodule (p : Submodule R A) (h_mul) :
(p.toNonUnitalSubalgebra h_mul).toSubmodule = p :=
SetLike.coe_injective rfl
@[simp]
theorem _root_.NonUnitalSubalgebra.toSubmodule_toNonUnitalSubalgebra (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :
(S.toSubmodule.toNonUnitalSubalgebra fun _ _ => mul_mem (s := S)) = S :=
SetLike.coe_injective rfl
end Submodule
namespace NonUnitalAlgHom
variable {F : Type v'} {R' : Type u'} {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w} {C : Type w'}
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [Module R B]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring C] [Module R C] [FunLike F A B] [NonUnitalAlgHomClass F R A B]
/-- Range of an `NonUnitalAlgHom` as a non-unital subalgebra. -/
protected def range (φ : F) : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B where
toNonUnitalSubsemiring := NonUnitalRingHom.srange (φ : A →ₙ+* B)
smul_mem' := fun r a => by rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩; exact ⟨r • a, map_smul φ r a⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_range (φ : F) {y : B} :
y ∈ (NonUnitalAlgHom.range φ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) ↔ ∃ x : A, φ x = y :=
NonUnitalRingHom.mem_srange
theorem mem_range_self (φ : F) (x : A) :
φ x ∈ (NonUnitalAlgHom.range φ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) :=
(NonUnitalAlgHom.mem_range φ).2 ⟨x, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_range (φ : F) :
((NonUnitalAlgHom.range φ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) : Set B) = Set.range (φ : A → B) := by
ext
rw [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_range]
rfl
theorem range_comp (f : A →ₙₐ[R] B) (g : B →ₙₐ[R] C) :
NonUnitalAlgHom.range (g.comp f) = (NonUnitalAlgHom.range f).map g :=
SetLike.coe_injective (Set.range_comp g f)
theorem range_comp_le_range (f : A →ₙₐ[R] B) (g : B →ₙₐ[R] C) :
NonUnitalAlgHom.range (g.comp f) ≤ NonUnitalAlgHom.range g :=
SetLike.coe_mono (Set.range_comp_subset_range f g)
/-- Restrict the codomain of a non-unital algebra homomorphism. -/
def codRestrict (f : F) (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) (hf : ∀ x, f x ∈ S) : A →ₙₐ[R] S :=
{ NonUnitalRingHom.codRestrict (f : A →ₙ+* B) S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring hf with
map_smul' := fun r a => Subtype.ext <| map_smul f r a }
@[simp]
theorem subtype_comp_codRestrict (f : F) (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) (hf : ∀ x : A, f x ∈ S) :
(NonUnitalSubalgebraClass.subtype S).comp (NonUnitalAlgHom.codRestrict f S hf) = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_codRestrict (f : F) (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) (hf : ∀ x, f x ∈ S) (x : A) :
↑(NonUnitalAlgHom.codRestrict f S hf x) = f x :=
rfl
theorem injective_codRestrict (f : F) (S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) (hf : ∀ x : A, f x ∈ S) :
Function.Injective (NonUnitalAlgHom.codRestrict f S hf) ↔ Function.Injective f :=
⟨fun H _x _y hxy => H <| Subtype.eq hxy, fun H _x _y hxy => H (congr_arg Subtype.val hxy :)⟩
/-- Restrict the codomain of an `NonUnitalAlgHom` `f` to `f.range`.
This is the bundled version of `Set.rangeFactorization`. -/
abbrev rangeRestrict (f : F) : A →ₙₐ[R] (NonUnitalAlgHom.range f : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) :=
NonUnitalAlgHom.codRestrict f (NonUnitalAlgHom.range f) (NonUnitalAlgHom.mem_range_self f)
/-- The equalizer of two non-unital `R`-algebra homomorphisms -/
def equalizer (ϕ ψ : F) : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A where
carrier := {a | (ϕ a : B) = ψ a}
zero_mem' := by rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, map_zero, map_zero]
add_mem' {x y} (hx : ϕ x = ψ x) (hy : ϕ y = ψ y) := by
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, map_add, map_add, hx, hy]
mul_mem' {x y} (hx : ϕ x = ψ x) (hy : ϕ y = ψ y) := by
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, map_mul, map_mul, hx, hy]
smul_mem' r x (hx : ϕ x = ψ x) := by rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, map_smul, map_smul, hx]
@[simp]
theorem mem_equalizer (φ ψ : F) (x : A) :
x ∈ NonUnitalAlgHom.equalizer φ ψ ↔ φ x = ψ x :=
Iff.rfl
/-- The range of a morphism of algebras is a fintype, if the domain is a fintype.
Note that this instance can cause a diamond with `Subtype.fintype` if `B` is also a fintype. -/
instance fintypeRange [Fintype A] [DecidableEq B] (φ : F) :
Fintype (NonUnitalAlgHom.range φ) :=
Set.fintypeRange φ
end NonUnitalAlgHom
namespace NonUnitalAlgebra
variable {F : Type*} (R : Type u) {A : Type v} {B : Type w}
variable [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A]
@[simp]
lemma span_eq_toSubmodule (s : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :
Submodule.span R (s : Set A) = s.toSubmodule := by
simp [SetLike.ext'_iff, Submodule.coe_span_eq_self]
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring B] [Module R B]
variable [FunLike F A B] [NonUnitalAlgHomClass F R A B]
section IsScalarTower
variable [IsScalarTower R A A] [SMulCommClass R A A]
/-- The minimal non-unital subalgebra that includes `s`. -/
def adjoin (s : Set A) : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A :=
{ Submodule.span R (NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure s : Set A) with
mul_mem' :=
@fun a b (ha : a ∈ Submodule.span R (NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure s : Set A))
(hb : b ∈ Submodule.span R (NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure s : Set A)) =>
show a * b ∈ Submodule.span R (NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure s : Set A) by
refine Submodule.span_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ha
· refine Submodule.span_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ hb
· exact fun x (hx : x ∈ NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure s) y
(hy : y ∈ NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure s) => Submodule.subset_span (mul_mem hy hx)
· exact fun x _hx => (mul_zero x).symm ▸ Submodule.zero_mem _
· exact fun x y _ _ hx hy z hz => (mul_add z x y).symm ▸ add_mem (hx z hz) (hy z hz)
· exact fun r x _ hx y hy =>
(mul_smul_comm r y x).symm ▸ SMulMemClass.smul_mem r (hx y hy)
· exact (zero_mul b).symm ▸ Submodule.zero_mem _
· exact fun x y _ _ => (add_mul x y b).symm ▸ add_mem
· exact fun r x _ hx => (smul_mul_assoc r x b).symm ▸ SMulMemClass.smul_mem r hx }
theorem adjoin_toSubmodule (s : Set A) :
(adjoin R s).toSubmodule = Submodule.span R (NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure s : Set A) :=
rfl
@[aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [SetLike])]
theorem subset_adjoin {s : Set A} : s ⊆ adjoin R s :=
NonUnitalSubsemiring.subset_closure.trans Submodule.subset_span
theorem self_mem_adjoin_singleton (x : A) : x ∈ adjoin R ({x} : Set A) :=
NonUnitalAlgebra.subset_adjoin R (Set.mem_singleton x)
variable {R}
protected theorem gc : GaloisConnection (adjoin R : Set A → NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (↑) :=
fun s S =>
⟨fun H => (NonUnitalSubsemiring.subset_closure.trans Submodule.subset_span).trans H,
fun H => show Submodule.span R _ ≤ S.toSubmodule from Submodule.span_le.mpr <|
show NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure s ≤ S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring from
NonUnitalSubsemiring.closure_le.2 H⟩
/-- Galois insertion between `adjoin` and `Subtype.val`. -/
protected def gi : GaloisInsertion (adjoin R : Set A → NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) (↑) where
choice s hs := (adjoin R s).copy s <| le_antisymm (NonUnitalAlgebra.gc.le_u_l s) hs
gc := NonUnitalAlgebra.gc
le_l_u S := (NonUnitalAlgebra.gc (S : Set A) (adjoin R S)).1 <| le_rfl
choice_eq _ _ := NonUnitalSubalgebra.copy_eq _ _ _
instance : CompleteLattice (NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :=
GaloisInsertion.liftCompleteLattice NonUnitalAlgebra.gi
theorem adjoin_le {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {s : Set A} (hs : s ⊆ S) : adjoin R s ≤ S :=
NonUnitalAlgebra.gc.l_le hs
theorem adjoin_le_iff {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {s : Set A} : adjoin R s ≤ S ↔ s ⊆ S :=
NonUnitalAlgebra.gc _ _
theorem adjoin_union (s t : Set A) : adjoin R (s ∪ t) = adjoin R s ⊔ adjoin R t :=
(NonUnitalAlgebra.gc : GaloisConnection _ ((↑) : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A → Set A)).l_sup
lemma adjoin_eq (s : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : adjoin R (s : Set A) = s :=
le_antisymm (adjoin_le le_rfl) (subset_adjoin R)
/-- If some predicate holds for all `x ∈ (s : Set A)` and this predicate is closed under the
`algebraMap`, addition, multiplication and star operations, then it holds for `a ∈ adjoin R s`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem adjoin_induction {s : Set A} {p : (x : A) → x ∈ adjoin R s → Prop}
(mem : ∀ (x) (hx : x ∈ s), p x (subset_adjoin R hx))
(add : ∀ x y hx hy, p x hx → p y hy → p (x + y) (add_mem hx hy)) (zero : p 0 (zero_mem _))
(mul : ∀ x y hx hy, p x hx → p y hy → p (x * y) (mul_mem hx hy))
(smul : ∀ r x hx, p x hx → p (r • x) (SMulMemClass.smul_mem r hx))
{x} (hx : x ∈ adjoin R s) : p x hx :=
let S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A :=
{ carrier := { x | ∃ hx, p x hx }
mul_mem' := (Exists.elim · fun _ ha ↦ (Exists.elim · fun _ hb ↦ ⟨_, mul _ _ _ _ ha hb⟩))
add_mem' := (Exists.elim · fun _ ha ↦ (Exists.elim · fun _ hb ↦ ⟨_, add _ _ _ _ ha hb⟩))
smul_mem' := fun r ↦ (Exists.elim · fun _ hb ↦ ⟨_, smul r _ _ hb⟩)
zero_mem' := ⟨_, zero⟩ }
adjoin_le (S := S) (fun y hy ↦ ⟨subset_adjoin R hy, mem y hy⟩) hx |>.elim fun _ ↦ id
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem adjoin_induction₂ {s : Set A} {p : ∀ x y, x ∈ adjoin R s → y ∈ adjoin R s → Prop}
(mem_mem : ∀ (x) (y) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s), p x y (subset_adjoin R hx) (subset_adjoin R hy))
(zero_left : ∀ x hx, p 0 x (zero_mem _) hx) (zero_right : ∀ x hx, p x 0 hx (zero_mem _))
(add_left : ∀ x y z hx hy hz, p x z hx hz → p y z hy hz → p (x + y) z (add_mem hx hy) hz)
(add_right : ∀ x y z hx hy hz, p x y hx hy → p x z hx hz → p x (y + z) hx (add_mem hy hz))
(mul_left : ∀ x y z hx hy hz, p x z hx hz → p y z hy hz → p (x * y) z (mul_mem hx hy) hz)
(mul_right : ∀ x y z hx hy hz, p x y hx hy → p x z hx hz → p x (y * z) hx (mul_mem hy hz))
(smul_left : ∀ r x y hx hy, p x y hx hy → p (r • x) y (SMulMemClass.smul_mem r hx) hy)
(smul_right : ∀ r x y hx hy, p x y hx hy → p x (r • y) hx (SMulMemClass.smul_mem r hy))
{x y : A} (hx : x ∈ adjoin R s) (hy : y ∈ adjoin R s) :
p x y hx hy := by
induction hy using adjoin_induction with
| mem z hz =>
induction hx using adjoin_induction with
| mem _ h => exact mem_mem _ _ h hz
| zero => exact zero_left _ _
| mul _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => exact mul_left _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂
| add _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => exact add_left _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂
| smul _ _ _ h => exact smul_left _ _ _ _ _ h
| zero => exact zero_right x hx
| mul _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => exact mul_right _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂
| add _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => exact add_right _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂
| smul _ _ _ h => exact smul_right _ _ _ _ _ h
open Submodule in
lemma adjoin_eq_span (s : Set A) : (adjoin R s).toSubmodule = span R (Subsemigroup.closure s) := by
apply le_antisymm
· intro x hx
induction hx using adjoin_induction with
| mem x hx => exact subset_span <| Subsemigroup.subset_closure hx
| add x y _ _ hpx hpy => exact add_mem hpx hpy
| zero => exact zero_mem _
| mul x y _ _ hpx hpy =>
apply span_induction₂ ?Hs (by simp) (by simp) ?Hadd_l ?Hadd_r ?Hsmul_l ?Hsmul_r hpx hpy
case Hs => exact fun x y hx hy ↦ subset_span <| mul_mem hx hy
case Hadd_l => exact fun x y z _ _ _ hxz hyz ↦ by simpa [add_mul] using add_mem hxz hyz
case Hadd_r => exact fun x y z _ _ _ hxz hyz ↦ by simpa [mul_add] using add_mem hxz hyz
case Hsmul_l => exact fun r x y _ _ hxy ↦ by simpa [smul_mul_assoc] using smul_mem _ _ hxy
case Hsmul_r => exact fun r x y _ _ hxy ↦ by simpa [mul_smul_comm] using smul_mem _ _ hxy
| smul r x _ hpx => exact smul_mem _ _ hpx
· apply span_le.2 _
show Subsemigroup.closure s ≤ (adjoin R s).toSubsemigroup
exact Subsemigroup.closure_le.2 (subset_adjoin R)
variable (R A)
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_empty : adjoin R (∅ : Set A) = ⊥ :=
show adjoin R ⊥ = ⊥ by apply GaloisConnection.l_bot; exact NonUnitalAlgebra.gc
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_univ : adjoin R (Set.univ : Set A) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 fun _x hx => subset_adjoin R hx
open NonUnitalSubalgebra in
lemma _root_.NonUnitalAlgHom.map_adjoin [IsScalarTower R B B] [SMulCommClass R B B]
(f : F) (s : Set A) : map f (adjoin R s) = adjoin R (f '' s) :=
Set.image_preimage.l_comm_of_u_comm (gc_map_comap f) NonUnitalAlgebra.gi.gc
NonUnitalAlgebra.gi.gc fun _t => rfl
open NonUnitalSubalgebra in
@[simp]
lemma _root_.NonUnitalAlgHom.map_adjoin_singleton [IsScalarTower R B B] [SMulCommClass R B B]
(f : F) (x : A) : map f (adjoin R {x}) = adjoin R {f x} := by
simp [NonUnitalAlgHom.map_adjoin]
variable {R A}
@[simp]
theorem coe_top : (↑(⊤ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) : Set A) = Set.univ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_top {x : A} : x ∈ (⊤ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :=
Set.mem_univ x
@[simp]
theorem top_toSubmodule : (⊤ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A).toSubmodule = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_toNonUnitalSubsemiring : (⊤ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A).toNonUnitalSubsemiring = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_toSubring {R A : Type*} [CommRing R] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing A] [Module R A]
[IsScalarTower R A A] [SMulCommClass R A A] :
(⊤ : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A).toNonUnitalSubring = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toSubmodule_eq_top {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} : S.toSubmodule = ⊤ ↔ S = ⊤ :=
NonUnitalSubalgebra.toSubmodule'.injective.eq_iff' top_toSubmodule
@[simp]
theorem toNonUnitalSubsemiring_eq_top {S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} :
S.toNonUnitalSubsemiring = ⊤ ↔ S = ⊤ :=
NonUnitalSubalgebra.toNonUnitalSubsemiring_injective.eq_iff' top_toNonUnitalSubsemiring
@[simp]
theorem to_subring_eq_top {R A : Type*} [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A]
{S : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} : S.toNonUnitalSubring = ⊤ ↔ S = ⊤ :=
NonUnitalSubalgebra.toNonUnitalSubring_injective.eq_iff' top_toSubring
theorem mem_sup_left {S T : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} : ∀ {x : A}, x ∈ S → x ∈ S ⊔ T := by
rw [← SetLike.le_def]
exact le_sup_left
theorem mem_sup_right {S T : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} : ∀ {x : A}, x ∈ T → x ∈ S ⊔ T := by
rw [← SetLike.le_def]
exact le_sup_right
theorem mul_mem_sup {S T : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A} {x y : A} (hx : x ∈ S) (hy : y ∈ T) :
x * y ∈ S ⊔ T :=
mul_mem (mem_sup_left hx) (mem_sup_right hy)
theorem map_sup [IsScalarTower R B B] [SMulCommClass R B B]
(f : F) (S T : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :
((S ⊔ T).map f : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) = S.map f ⊔ T.map f :=
(NonUnitalSubalgebra.gc_map_comap f).l_sup
theorem map_inf [IsScalarTower R B B] [SMulCommClass R B B]
(f : F) (hf : Function.Injective f) (S T : NonUnitalSubalgebra R A) :
| ((S ⊓ T).map f : NonUnitalSubalgebra R B) = S.map f ⊓ T.map f :=
SetLike.coe_injective (Set.image_inter hf)
| Mathlib/Algebra/Algebra/NonUnitalSubalgebra.lean | 755 | 757 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Sébastien Gouëzel, Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Field
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.MonoidLocalization.Basic
/-!
# Properties of inner product spaces
This file proves many basic properties of inner product spaces (real or complex).
## Main results
- `inner_mul_inner_self_le`: the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality (one of many variants).
- `norm_inner_eq_norm_iff`: the equality criteion in the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality (also in many
variants).
- `inner_eq_sum_norm_sq_div_four`: the polarization identity.
## Tags
inner product space, Hilbert space, norm
-/
noncomputable section
open RCLike Real Filter Topology ComplexConjugate Finsupp
open LinearMap (BilinForm)
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
section BasicProperties_Seminormed
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local postfix:90 "†" => starRingEnd _
export InnerProductSpace (norm_sq_eq_re_inner)
@[simp]
theorem inner_conj_symm (x y : E) : ⟪y, x⟫† = ⟪x, y⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.conj_inner_symm _ _
theorem real_inner_comm (x y : F) : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_conj_symm ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
theorem inner_eq_zero_symm {x y : E} : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0 ↔ ⟪y, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm]
exact star_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_im (x : E) : im ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 := by rw [← @ofReal_inj 𝕜, im_eq_conj_sub]; simp
theorem inner_add_left (x y z : E) : ⟪x + y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ + ⟪y, z⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.add_left _ _ _
theorem inner_add_right (x y z : E) : ⟪x, y + z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪x, z⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_add_left, RingHom.map_add]
simp only [inner_conj_symm]
theorem inner_re_symm (x y : E) : re ⟪x, y⟫ = re ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
theorem inner_im_symm (x y : E) : im ⟪x, y⟫ = -im ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_im]
section Algebra
variable {𝕝 : Type*} [CommSemiring 𝕝] [StarRing 𝕝] [Algebra 𝕝 𝕜] [Module 𝕝 E]
[IsScalarTower 𝕝 𝕜 E] [StarModule 𝕝 𝕜]
/-- See `inner_smul_left` for the common special when `𝕜 = 𝕝`. -/
lemma inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← algebraMap_smul 𝕜 r, InnerProductSpace.smul_left, starRingEnd_apply, starRingEnd_apply,
← algebraMap_star_comm, ← smul_eq_mul, algebraMap_smul]
/-- Special case of `inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul` when the acting ring has a trivial star
(eg `ℕ`, `ℤ`, `ℚ≥0`, `ℚ`, `ℝ`). -/
lemma inner_smul_left_eq_smul [TrivialStar 𝕝] (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul, starRingEnd_apply, star_trivial]
/-- See `inner_smul_right` for the common special when `𝕜 = 𝕝`. -/
lemma inner_smul_right_eq_smul (x y : E) (r : 𝕝) : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul, starRingEnd_apply, starRingEnd_apply,
star_smul, star_star, ← starRingEnd_apply, inner_conj_symm]
end Algebra
/-- See `inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul` for the case of a general algebra action. -/
theorem inner_smul_left (x y : E) (r : 𝕜) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
inner_smul_left_eq_star_smul ..
theorem real_inner_smul_left (x y : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪r • x, y⟫_ℝ = r * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
inner_smul_left _ _ _
theorem inner_smul_real_left (x y : E) (r : ℝ) : ⟪(r : 𝕜) • x, y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_left, conj_ofReal, Algebra.smul_def]
/-- See `inner_smul_right_eq_smul` for the case of a general algebra action. -/
theorem inner_smul_right (x y : E) (r : 𝕜) : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
inner_smul_right_eq_smul ..
theorem real_inner_smul_right (x y : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, r • y⟫_ℝ = r * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
inner_smul_right _ _ _
theorem inner_smul_real_right (x y : E) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, (r : 𝕜) • y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_right, Algebra.smul_def]
/-- The inner product as a sesquilinear form.
Note that in the case `𝕜 = ℝ` this is a bilinear form. -/
@[simps!]
def sesqFormOfInner : E →ₗ[𝕜] E →ₗ⋆[𝕜] 𝕜 :=
LinearMap.mk₂'ₛₗ (RingHom.id 𝕜) (starRingEnd _) (fun x y => ⟪y, x⟫)
(fun _x _y _z => inner_add_right _ _ _) (fun _r _x _y => inner_smul_right _ _ _)
(fun _x _y _z => inner_add_left _ _ _) fun _r _x _y => inner_smul_left _ _ _
/-- The real inner product as a bilinear form.
Note that unlike `sesqFormOfInner`, this does not reverse the order of the arguments. -/
@[simps!]
def bilinFormOfRealInner : BilinForm ℝ F := sesqFormOfInner.flip
/-- An inner product with a sum on the left. -/
theorem sum_inner {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪∑ i ∈ s, f i, x⟫ = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟪f i, x⟫ :=
map_sum (sesqFormOfInner (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E) x) _ _
/-- An inner product with a sum on the right. -/
theorem inner_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪x, ∑ i ∈ s, f i⟫ = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟪x, f i⟫ :=
map_sum (LinearMap.flip sesqFormOfInner x) _ _
/-- An inner product with a sum on the left, `Finsupp` version. -/
protected theorem Finsupp.sum_inner {ι : Type*} (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • v i, x⟫ = l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => conj a • ⟪v i, x⟫ := by
convert sum_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) l.support (fun a => l a • v a) x
simp only [inner_smul_left, Finsupp.sum, smul_eq_mul]
/-- An inner product with a sum on the right, `Finsupp` version. -/
protected theorem Finsupp.inner_sum {ι : Type*} (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪x, l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • v i⟫ = l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • ⟪x, v i⟫ := by
convert inner_sum (𝕜 := 𝕜) l.support (fun a => l a • v a) x
simp only [inner_smul_right, Finsupp.sum, smul_eq_mul]
protected theorem DFinsupp.sum_inner {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, AddZeroClass (α i)] [∀ (i) (x : α i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (f : ∀ i, α i → E)
(l : Π₀ i, α i) (x : E) : ⟪l.sum f, x⟫ = l.sum fun i a => ⟪f i a, x⟫ := by
simp +contextual only [DFinsupp.sum, sum_inner, smul_eq_mul]
protected theorem DFinsupp.inner_sum {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, AddZeroClass (α i)] [∀ (i) (x : α i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (f : ∀ i, α i → E)
(l : Π₀ i, α i) (x : E) : ⟪x, l.sum f⟫ = l.sum fun i a => ⟪x, f i a⟫ := by
simp +contextual only [DFinsupp.sum, inner_sum, smul_eq_mul]
@[simp]
theorem inner_zero_left (x : E) : ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← zero_smul 𝕜 (0 : E), inner_smul_left, RingHom.map_zero, zero_mul]
theorem inner_re_zero_left (x : E) : re ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
simp only [inner_zero_left, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
@[simp]
theorem inner_zero_right (x : E) : ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_zero_left, RingHom.map_zero]
theorem inner_re_zero_right (x : E) : re ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
simp only [inner_zero_right, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
theorem inner_self_nonneg {x : E} : 0 ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ :=
PreInnerProductSpace.toCore.re_inner_nonneg x
theorem real_inner_self_nonneg {x : F} : 0 ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_self_nonneg ℝ F _ _ _ x
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_ofReal_re (x : E) : (re ⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ :=
((RCLike.is_real_TFAE (⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜)).out 2 3).2 (inner_self_im (𝕜 := 𝕜) x)
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K (x : E) : ⟪x, x⟫ = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 := by
rw [← inner_self_ofReal_re, ← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, ofReal_pow]
theorem inner_self_re_eq_norm (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖⟪x, x⟫‖ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← inner_self_ofReal_re]
symm
exact norm_of_nonneg inner_self_nonneg
theorem inner_self_ofReal_norm (x : E) : (‖⟪x, x⟫‖ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ := by
rw [← inner_self_re_eq_norm]
exact inner_self_ofReal_re _
theorem real_inner_self_abs (x : F) : |⟪x, x⟫_ℝ| = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_self_ofReal_norm ℝ F _ _ _ x
theorem norm_inner_symm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, norm_conj]
@[simp]
theorem inner_neg_left (x y : E) : ⟪-x, y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← neg_one_smul 𝕜 x, inner_smul_left]
simp
@[simp]
theorem inner_neg_right (x y : E) : ⟪x, -y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_neg_left]; simp only [RingHom.map_neg, inner_conj_symm]
theorem inner_neg_neg (x y : E) : ⟪-x, -y⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ := by simp
theorem inner_self_conj (x : E) : ⟪x, x⟫† = ⟪x, x⟫ := inner_conj_symm _ _
theorem inner_sub_left (x y z : E) : ⟪x - y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ - ⟪y, z⟫ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_left]
theorem inner_sub_right (x y z : E) : ⟪x, y - z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪x, z⟫ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_right]
theorem inner_mul_symm_re_eq_norm (x y : E) : re (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫) = ‖⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫‖ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, mul_comm]
exact re_eq_norm_of_mul_conj (inner y x)
/-- Expand `⟪x + y, x + y⟫` -/
theorem inner_add_add_self (x y : E) : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ := by
simp only [inner_add_left, inner_add_right]; ring
/-- Expand `⟪x + y, x + y⟫_ℝ` -/
theorem real_inner_add_add_self (x y : F) :
⟪x + y, x + y⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := by
have : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm]; rfl
simp only [inner_add_add_self, this, add_left_inj]
ring
-- Expand `⟪x - y, x - y⟫`
theorem inner_sub_sub_self (x y : E) : ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ := by
simp only [inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right]; ring
/-- Expand `⟪x - y, x - y⟫_ℝ` -/
theorem real_inner_sub_sub_self (x y : F) :
⟪x - y, x - y⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := by
have : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm]; rfl
simp only [inner_sub_sub_self, this, add_left_inj]
ring
/-- Parallelogram law -/
theorem parallelogram_law {x y : E} : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ + ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = 2 * (⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫) := by
simp only [inner_add_add_self, inner_sub_sub_self]
ring
/-- **Cauchy–Schwarz inequality**. -/
theorem inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ * ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ * re ⟪y, y⟫ :=
letI cd : PreInnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := PreInnerProductSpace.toCore
InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_mul_inner_self_le x y
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality for real inner products. -/
theorem real_inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : F) : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ * ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ :=
calc
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ‖⟪x, y⟫_ℝ‖ * ‖⟪y, x⟫_ℝ‖ := by
rw [real_inner_comm y, ← norm_mul]
exact le_abs_self _
_ ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ * ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := @inner_mul_inner_self_le ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
end BasicProperties_Seminormed
section BasicProperties
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
export InnerProductSpace (norm_sq_eq_re_inner)
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_eq_zero {x : E} : ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
rw [inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, sq_eq_zero_iff, ofReal_eq_zero, norm_eq_zero]
theorem inner_self_ne_zero {x : E} : ⟪x, x⟫ ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
inner_self_eq_zero.not
variable (𝕜)
theorem ext_inner_left {x y : E} (h : ∀ v, ⟪v, x⟫ = ⟪v, y⟫) : x = y := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜, inner_sub_right, sub_eq_zero, h (x - y)]
theorem ext_inner_right {x y : E} (h : ∀ v, ⟪x, v⟫ = ⟪y, v⟫) : x = y := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜, inner_sub_left, sub_eq_zero, h (x - y)]
variable {𝕜}
@[simp]
theorem re_inner_self_nonpos {x : E} : re ⟪x, x⟫ ≤ 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
rw [← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, (sq_nonneg _).le_iff_eq, sq_eq_zero_iff, norm_eq_zero]
@[simp]
lemma re_inner_self_pos {x : E} : 0 < re ⟪x, x⟫ ↔ x ≠ 0 := by
simpa [-re_inner_self_nonpos] using re_inner_self_nonpos (𝕜 := 𝕜) (x := x).not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias inner_self_nonpos := re_inner_self_nonpos
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias inner_self_pos := re_inner_self_pos
open scoped InnerProductSpace in
theorem real_inner_self_nonpos {x : F} : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 ↔ x = 0 := re_inner_self_nonpos (𝕜 := ℝ)
open scoped InnerProductSpace in
theorem real_inner_self_pos {x : F} : 0 < ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ ↔ x ≠ 0 := re_inner_self_pos (𝕜 := ℝ)
/-- A family of vectors is linearly independent if they are nonzero
and orthogonal. -/
theorem linearIndependent_of_ne_zero_of_inner_eq_zero {ι : Type*} {v : ι → E} (hz : ∀ i, v i ≠ 0)
(ho : Pairwise fun i j => ⟪v i, v j⟫ = 0) : LinearIndependent 𝕜 v := by
rw [linearIndependent_iff']
intro s g hg i hi
have h' : g i * inner (v i) (v i) = inner (v i) (∑ j ∈ s, g j • v j) := by
rw [inner_sum]
symm
convert Finset.sum_eq_single (M := 𝕜) i ?_ ?_
· rw [inner_smul_right]
· intro j _hj hji
rw [inner_smul_right, ho hji.symm, mul_zero]
· exact fun h => False.elim (h hi)
simpa [hg, hz] using h'
end BasicProperties
section Norm_Seminormed
open scoped InnerProductSpace
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local notation "IK" => @RCLike.I 𝕜 _
theorem norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (x : E) : ‖x‖ = √(re ⟪x, x⟫) :=
calc
‖x‖ = √(‖x‖ ^ 2) := (sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)).symm
_ = √(re ⟪x, x⟫) := congr_arg _ (norm_sq_eq_re_inner _)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias norm_eq_sqrt_inner := norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner
theorem norm_eq_sqrt_real_inner (x : F) : ‖x‖ = √⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner ℝ _ _ _ _ x
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ := by
rw [@norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner 𝕜, ← sqrt_mul inner_self_nonneg (re ⟪x, x⟫),
sqrt_mul_self inner_self_nonneg]
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_sq (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [pow_two, inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
theorem real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm (x : F) : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ := by
have h := @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm ℝ F _ _ _ x
simpa using h
theorem real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq (x : F) : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [pow_two, real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_sq (x y : E) : ‖x + y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 + 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
repeat' rw [sq (M := ℝ), ← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜]
rw [inner_add_add_self, two_mul]
simp only [add_assoc, add_left_inj, add_right_inj, AddMonoidHom.map_add]
rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
alias norm_add_pow_two := norm_add_sq
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_sq_real (x y : F) : ‖x + y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
have h := @norm_add_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
alias norm_add_pow_two_real := norm_add_sq_real
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_mul_self (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
repeat' rw [← sq (M := ℝ)]
exact norm_add_sq _ _
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_mul_self_real (x y : F) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
have h := @norm_add_mul_self ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_sq (x y : E) : ‖x - y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 - 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, @norm_add_sq 𝕜 _ _ _ _ x (-y), norm_neg, inner_neg_right, map_neg, mul_neg,
sub_eq_add_neg]
alias norm_sub_pow_two := norm_sub_sq
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_real (x y : F) : ‖x - y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 :=
@norm_sub_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ _ _
alias norm_sub_pow_two_real := norm_sub_sq_real
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_mul_self (x y : E) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
repeat' rw [← sq (M := ℝ)]
exact norm_sub_sq _ _
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_mul_self_real (x y : F) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
have h := @norm_sub_mul_self ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem norm_inner_le_norm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := by
rw [norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) x, norm_eq_sqrt_re_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) y]
letI : PreInnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := PreInnerProductSpace.toCore
exact InnerProductSpace.Core.norm_inner_le_norm x y
theorem nnnorm_inner_le_nnnorm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖₊ ≤ ‖x‖₊ * ‖y‖₊ :=
norm_inner_le_norm x y
theorem re_inner_le_norm (x y : E) : re ⟪x, y⟫ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
le_trans (re_le_norm (inner x y)) (norm_inner_le_norm x y)
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem abs_real_inner_le_norm (x y : F) : |⟪x, y⟫_ℝ| ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(Real.norm_eq_abs _).ge.trans (norm_inner_le_norm x y)
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem real_inner_le_norm (x y : F) : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
le_trans (le_abs_self _) (abs_real_inner_le_norm _ _)
lemma inner_eq_zero_of_left {x : E} (y : E) (h : ‖x‖ = 0) : ⟪x, y⟫_𝕜 = 0 := by
rw [← norm_eq_zero]
refine le_antisymm ?_ (by positivity)
exact norm_inner_le_norm _ _ |>.trans <| by simp [h]
lemma inner_eq_zero_of_right (x : E) {y : E} (h : ‖y‖ = 0) : ⟪x, y⟫_𝕜 = 0 := by
rw [inner_eq_zero_symm, inner_eq_zero_of_left _ h]
variable (𝕜)
include 𝕜 in
theorem parallelogram_law_with_norm (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ + ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = 2 * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) := by
simp only [← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜]
rw [← re.map_add, parallelogram_law, two_mul, two_mul]
simp only [re.map_add]
include 𝕜 in
theorem parallelogram_law_with_nnnorm (x y : E) :
| ‖x + y‖₊ * ‖x + y‖₊ + ‖x - y‖₊ * ‖x - y‖₊ = 2 * (‖x‖₊ * ‖x‖₊ + ‖y‖₊ * ‖y‖₊) :=
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Basic.lean | 458 | 458 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Peter Nelson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Peter Nelson
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Finite
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Powerset
/-!
# Noncomputable Set Cardinality
We define the cardinality of set `s` as a term `Set.encard s : ℕ∞` and a term `Set.ncard s : ℕ`.
The latter takes the junk value of zero if `s` is infinite. Both functions are noncomputable, and
are defined in terms of `ENat.card` (which takes a type as its argument); this file can be seen
as an API for the same function in the special case where the type is a coercion of a `Set`,
allowing for smoother interactions with the `Set` API.
`Set.encard` never takes junk values, so is more mathematically natural than `Set.ncard`, even
though it takes values in a less convenient type. It is probably the right choice in settings where
one is concerned with the cardinalities of sets that may or may not be infinite.
`Set.ncard` has a nicer codomain, but when using it, `Set.Finite` hypotheses are normally needed to
make sure its values are meaningful. More generally, `Set.ncard` is intended to be used over the
obvious alternative `Finset.card` when finiteness is 'propositional' rather than 'structural'.
When working with sets that are finite by virtue of their definition, then `Finset.card` probably
makes more sense. One setting where `Set.ncard` works nicely is in a type `α` with `[Finite α]`,
where every set is automatically finite. In this setting, we use default arguments and a simple
tactic so that finiteness goals are discharged automatically in `Set.ncard` theorems.
## Main Definitions
* `Set.encard s` is the cardinality of the set `s` as an extended natural number, with value `⊤` if
`s` is infinite.
* `Set.ncard s` is the cardinality of the set `s` as a natural number, provided `s` is Finite.
If `s` is Infinite, then `Set.ncard s = 0`.
* `toFinite_tac` is a tactic that tries to synthesize a `Set.Finite s` argument with
`Set.toFinite`. This will work for `s : Set α` where there is a `Finite α` instance.
## Implementation Notes
The theorems in this file are very similar to those in `Data.Finset.Card`, but with `Set` operations
instead of `Finset`. We first prove all the theorems for `Set.encard`, and then derive most of the
`Set.ncard` results as a consequence. Things are done this way to avoid reliance on the `Finset` API
for theorems about infinite sets, and to allow for a refactor that removes or modifies `Set.ncard`
in the future.
Nearly all the theorems for `Set.ncard` require finiteness of one or more of their arguments. We
provide this assumption with a default argument of the form `(hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)`,
where `toFinite_tac` will find an `s.Finite` term in the cases where `s` is a set in a `Finite`
type.
Often, where there are two set arguments `s` and `t`, the finiteness of one follows from the other
in the context of the theorem, in which case we only include the ones that are needed, and derive
the other inside the proof. A few of the theorems, such as `ncard_union_le` do not require
finiteness arguments; they are true by coincidence due to junk values.
-/
namespace Set
variable {α β : Type*} {s t : Set α}
/-- The cardinality of a set as a term in `ℕ∞` -/
noncomputable def encard (s : Set α) : ℕ∞ := ENat.card s
@[simp] theorem encard_univ_coe (s : Set α) : encard (univ : Set s) = encard s := by
rw [encard, encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.univ ↑s)]
theorem encard_univ (α : Type*) :
encard (univ : Set α) = ENat.card α := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.univ α)]
theorem Finite.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (h : s.Finite) : s.encard = h.toFinset.card := by
have := h.fintype
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_coe_fintype_card, toFinite_toFinset, toFinset_card]
theorem encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : encard s = s.toFinset.card := by
have h := toFinite s
rw [h.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card, toFinite_toFinset]
@[simp] theorem toENat_cardinalMk (s : Set α) : (Cardinal.mk s).toENat = s.encard := rfl
theorem toENat_cardinalMk_subtype (P : α → Prop) :
(Cardinal.mk {x // P x}).toENat = {x | P x}.encard :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_fintypeCard (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : Fintype.card s = s.encard := by
simp [encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem encard_coe_eq_coe_finsetCard (s : Finset α) :
encard (s : Set α) = s.card := by
rw [Finite.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (Finset.finite_toSet s)]; simp
@[simp] theorem Infinite.encard_eq {s : Set α} (h : s.Infinite) : s.encard = ⊤ := by
have := h.to_subtype
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_top_of_infinite]
@[simp] theorem encard_eq_zero : s.encard = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_zero_iff_empty, isEmpty_subtype, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
@[simp] theorem encard_empty : (∅ : Set α).encard = 0 := by
rw [encard_eq_zero]
theorem nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (h : s.encard ≠ 0) : s.Nonempty := by
rwa [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, ← encard_eq_zero]
theorem encard_ne_zero : s.encard ≠ 0 ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [ne_eq, encard_eq_zero, nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
@[simp] theorem encard_pos : 0 < s.encard ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [pos_iff_ne_zero, encard_ne_zero]
protected alias ⟨_, Nonempty.encard_pos⟩ := encard_pos
@[simp] theorem encard_singleton (e : α) : ({e} : Set α).encard = 1 := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_coe_fintype_card, Fintype.card_ofSubsingleton, Nat.cast_one]
theorem encard_union_eq (h : Disjoint s t) : (s ∪ t).encard = s.encard + t.encard := by
classical
simp [encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.union h)]
theorem encard_insert_of_not_mem {a : α} (has : a ∉ s) : (insert a s).encard = s.encard + 1 := by
rw [← union_singleton, encard_union_eq (by simpa), encard_singleton]
theorem Finite.encard_lt_top (h : s.Finite) : s.encard < ⊤ := by
induction s, h using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert hat _ ht' =>
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem hat]
exact lt_tsub_iff_right.1 ht'
theorem Finite.encard_eq_coe (h : s.Finite) : s.encard = ENat.toNat s.encard :=
(ENat.coe_toNat h.encard_lt_top.ne).symm
theorem Finite.exists_encard_eq_coe (h : s.Finite) : ∃ (n : ℕ), s.encard = n :=
⟨_, h.encard_eq_coe⟩
@[simp] theorem encard_lt_top_iff : s.encard < ⊤ ↔ s.Finite :=
⟨fun h ↦ by_contra fun h' ↦ h.ne (Infinite.encard_eq h'), Finite.encard_lt_top⟩
@[simp] theorem encard_eq_top_iff : s.encard = ⊤ ↔ s.Infinite := by
rw [← not_iff_not, ← Ne, ← lt_top_iff_ne_top, encard_lt_top_iff, not_infinite]
alias ⟨_, encard_eq_top⟩ := encard_eq_top_iff
theorem encard_ne_top_iff : s.encard ≠ ⊤ ↔ s.Finite := by
simp
theorem finite_of_encard_le_coe {k : ℕ} (h : s.encard ≤ k) : s.Finite := by
rw [← encard_lt_top_iff]; exact h.trans_lt (WithTop.coe_lt_top _)
theorem finite_of_encard_eq_coe {k : ℕ} (h : s.encard = k) : s.Finite :=
finite_of_encard_le_coe h.le
theorem encard_le_coe_iff {k : ℕ} : s.encard ≤ k ↔ s.Finite ∧ ∃ (n₀ : ℕ), s.encard = n₀ ∧ n₀ ≤ k :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨finite_of_encard_le_coe h, by rwa [ENat.le_coe_iff] at h⟩,
fun ⟨_,⟨n₀,hs, hle⟩⟩ ↦ by rwa [hs, Nat.cast_le]⟩
@[simp]
theorem encard_prod : (s ×ˢ t).encard = s.encard * t.encard := by
simp [Set.encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.prod ..)]
section Lattice
theorem encard_le_encard (h : s ⊆ t) : s.encard ≤ t.encard := by
rw [← union_diff_cancel h, encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_right]; exact le_self_add
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-05")] alias encard_le_card := encard_le_encard
theorem encard_mono {α : Type*} : Monotone (encard : Set α → ℕ∞) :=
fun _ _ ↦ encard_le_encard
theorem encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : (t \ s).encard + s.encard = t.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, diff_union_self, union_eq_self_of_subset_right h]
@[simp] theorem one_le_encard_iff_nonempty : 1 ≤ s.encard ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, ← encard_eq_zero, ENat.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
theorem encard_diff_add_encard_inter (s t : Set α) :
(s \ t).encard + (s ∩ t).encard = s.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq (disjoint_of_subset_right inter_subset_right disjoint_sdiff_left),
diff_union_inter]
theorem encard_union_add_encard_inter (s t : Set α) :
(s ∪ t).encard + (s ∩ t).encard = s.encard + t.encard := by
rw [← diff_union_self, encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, add_right_comm,
encard_diff_add_encard_inter]
theorem encard_eq_encard_iff_encard_diff_eq_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard = t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard = (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_right_inj h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_le_encard_iff_encard_diff_le_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard ≤ t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard ≤ (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_le_add_iff_right h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_lt_encard_iff_encard_diff_lt_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard < t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard < (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_lt_add_iff_right h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_union_le (s t : Set α) : (s ∪ t).encard ≤ s.encard + t.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_add_encard_inter]; exact le_self_add
theorem finite_iff_finite_of_encard_eq_encard (h : s.encard = t.encard) : s.Finite ↔ t.Finite := by
rw [← encard_lt_top_iff, ← encard_lt_top_iff, h]
theorem infinite_iff_infinite_of_encard_eq_encard (h : s.encard = t.encard) :
s.Infinite ↔ t.Infinite := by rw [← encard_eq_top_iff, h, encard_eq_top_iff]
theorem Finite.finite_of_encard_le {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : t.encard ≤ s.encard) : t.Finite :=
encard_lt_top_iff.1 (h.trans_lt hs.encard_lt_top)
lemma Finite.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' (ht : t.Finite) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hts : t.encard ≤ s.encard) :
s = t := by
rw [← zero_add (a := encard s), ← encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset hst] at hts
have hdiff := WithTop.le_of_add_le_add_right (ht.subset hst).encard_lt_top.ne hts
rw [nonpos_iff_eq_zero, encard_eq_zero, diff_eq_empty] at hdiff
exact hst.antisymm hdiff
theorem Finite.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le (hs : s.Finite) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(hts : t.encard ≤ s.encard) : s = t :=
(hs.finite_of_encard_le hts).eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' hst hts
theorem Finite.encard_lt_encard (hs : s.Finite) (h : s ⊂ t) : s.encard < t.encard :=
(encard_mono h.subset).lt_of_ne fun he ↦ h.ne (hs.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le h.subset he.symm.le)
theorem encard_strictMono [Finite α] : StrictMono (encard : Set α → ℕ∞) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ (toFinite _).encard_lt_encard h
theorem encard_diff_add_encard (s t : Set α) : (s \ t).encard + t.encard = (s ∪ t).encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, diff_union_self]
theorem encard_le_encard_diff_add_encard (s t : Set α) : s.encard ≤ (s \ t).encard + t.encard :=
(encard_mono subset_union_left).trans_eq (encard_diff_add_encard _ _).symm
theorem tsub_encard_le_encard_diff (s t : Set α) : s.encard - t.encard ≤ (s \ t).encard := by
rw [tsub_le_iff_left, add_comm]; apply encard_le_encard_diff_add_encard
theorem encard_add_encard_compl (s : Set α) : s.encard + sᶜ.encard = (univ : Set α).encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq disjoint_compl_right, union_compl_self]
end Lattice
section InsertErase
variable {a b : α}
theorem encard_insert_le (s : Set α) (x : α) : (insert x s).encard ≤ s.encard + 1 := by
rw [← union_singleton, ← encard_singleton x]; apply encard_union_le
theorem encard_singleton_inter (s : Set α) (x : α) : ({x} ∩ s).encard ≤ 1 := by
rw [← encard_singleton x]; exact encard_le_encard inter_subset_left
theorem encard_diff_singleton_add_one (h : a ∈ s) :
(s \ {a}).encard + 1 = s.encard := by
rw [← encard_insert_of_not_mem (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl), insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem h]
theorem encard_diff_singleton_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) :
(s \ {a}).encard = s.encard - 1 := by
rw [← encard_diff_singleton_add_one h, ← WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top,
tsub_add_cancel_of_le (self_le_add_left _ _)]
theorem encard_tsub_one_le_encard_diff_singleton (s : Set α) (x : α) :
s.encard - 1 ≤ (s \ {x}).encard := by
rw [← encard_singleton x]; apply tsub_encard_le_encard_diff
theorem encard_exchange (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : (insert a (s \ {b})).encard = s.encard := by
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem, encard_diff_singleton_add_one hb]
simp_all only [not_true, mem_diff, mem_singleton_iff, false_and, not_false_eq_true]
theorem encard_exchange' (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : (insert a s \ {b}).encard = s.encard := by
rw [← insert_diff_singleton_comm (by rintro rfl; exact ha hb), encard_exchange ha hb]
theorem encard_eq_add_one_iff {k : ℕ∞} :
s.encard = k + 1 ↔ (∃ a t, ¬a ∈ t ∧ insert a t = s ∧ t.encard = k) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by simp [h])
refine ⟨a, s \ {a}, fun h ↦ h.2 rfl, by rwa [insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem], ?_⟩
rw [← WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top, ← h,
encard_diff_singleton_add_one ha]
rintro ⟨a, t, h, rfl, rfl⟩
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem h]
/-- Every set is either empty, infinite, or can have its `encard` reduced by a removal. Intended
for well-founded induction on the value of `encard`. -/
theorem eq_empty_or_encard_eq_top_or_encard_diff_singleton_lt (s : Set α) :
s = ∅ ∨ s.encard = ⊤ ∨ ∃ a ∈ s, (s \ {a}).encard < s.encard := by
refine s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim Or.inl (Or.inr ∘ fun ⟨a,ha⟩ ↦
(s.finite_or_infinite.elim (fun hfin ↦ Or.inr ⟨a, ha, ?_⟩) (Or.inl ∘ Infinite.encard_eq)))
rw [← encard_diff_singleton_add_one ha]; nth_rw 1 [← add_zero (encard _)]
exact WithTop.add_lt_add_left hfin.diff.encard_lt_top.ne zero_lt_one
end InsertErase
section SmallSets
theorem encard_pair {x y : α} (hne : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : Set α).encard = 2 := by
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem (by simpa), ← one_add_one_eq_two,
WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top, encard_singleton]
theorem encard_eq_one : s.encard = 1 ↔ ∃ x, s = {x} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ↦ by rw [hx, encard_singleton]⟩
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by rw [h]; simp)
exact ⟨x, ((finite_singleton x).eq_of_subset_of_encard_le (by simpa) (by simp [h])).symm⟩
theorem encard_le_one_iff_eq : s.encard ≤ 1 ↔ s = ∅ ∨ ∃ x, s = {x} := by
rw [le_iff_lt_or_eq, lt_iff_not_le, ENat.one_le_iff_ne_zero, not_not, encard_eq_zero,
encard_eq_one]
theorem encard_le_one_iff : s.encard ≤ 1 ↔ ∀ a b, a ∈ s → b ∈ s → a = b := by
rw [encard_le_one_iff_eq, or_iff_not_imp_left, ← Ne, ← nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
refine ⟨fun h a b has hbs ↦ ?_,
fun h ⟨x, hx⟩ ↦ ⟨x, ((singleton_subset_iff.2 hx).antisymm' (fun y hy ↦ h _ _ hy hx))⟩⟩
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := h ⟨_, has⟩
rw [(has : a = x), (hbs : b = x)]
theorem encard_le_one_iff_subsingleton : s.encard ≤ 1 ↔ s.Subsingleton := by
rw [encard_le_one_iff, Set.Subsingleton]
tauto
theorem one_lt_encard_iff_nontrivial : 1 < s.encard ↔ s.Nontrivial := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_lt, Set.not_nontrivial_iff, ← encard_le_one_iff_subsingleton]
theorem one_lt_encard_iff : 1 < s.encard ↔ ∃ a b, a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ s ∧ a ≠ b := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_exists, not_lt, encard_le_one_iff]; aesop
theorem exists_ne_of_one_lt_encard (h : 1 < s.encard) (a : α) : ∃ b ∈ s, b ≠ a := by
by_contra! h'
obtain ⟨b, b', hb, hb', hne⟩ := one_lt_encard_iff.1 h
apply hne
rw [h' b hb, h' b' hb']
theorem encard_eq_two : s.encard = 2 ↔ ∃ x y, x ≠ y ∧ s = {x, y} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, y, hne, hs⟩ ↦ by rw [hs, encard_pair hne]⟩
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by rw [h]; simp)
rw [← insert_eq_of_mem hx, ← insert_diff_singleton, encard_insert_of_not_mem (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl),
← one_add_one_eq_two, WithTop.add_right_inj (WithTop.one_ne_top), encard_eq_one] at h
obtain ⟨y, h⟩ := h
refine ⟨x, y, by rintro rfl; exact (h.symm.subset rfl).2 rfl, ?_⟩
rw [← h, insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem hx]
theorem encard_eq_three {α : Type u_1} {s : Set α} :
encard s = 3 ↔ ∃ x y z, x ≠ y ∧ x ≠ z ∧ y ≠ z ∧ s = {x, y, z} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, y, z, hxy, hyz, hxz, hs⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by rw [h]; simp)
rw [← insert_eq_of_mem hx, ← insert_diff_singleton,
encard_insert_of_not_mem (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl), (by exact rfl : (3 : ℕ∞) = 2 + 1),
WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top, encard_eq_two] at h
obtain ⟨y, z, hne, hs⟩ := h
refine ⟨x, y, z, ?_, ?_, hne, ?_⟩
· rintro rfl; exact (hs.symm.subset (Or.inl rfl)).2 rfl
· rintro rfl; exact (hs.symm.subset (Or.inr rfl)).2 rfl
rw [← hs, insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem hx]
rw [hs, encard_insert_of_not_mem, encard_insert_of_not_mem, encard_singleton] <;> aesop
theorem Nat.encard_range (k : ℕ) : {i | i < k}.encard = k := by
convert encard_coe_eq_coe_finsetCard (Finset.range k) using 1
· rw [Finset.coe_range, Iio_def]
rw [Finset.card_range]
end SmallSets
theorem Finite.eq_insert_of_subset_of_encard_eq_succ (hs : s.Finite) (h : s ⊆ t)
(hst : t.encard = s.encard + 1) : ∃ a, t = insert a s := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset h, add_comm, WithTop.add_left_inj hs.encard_lt_top.ne,
encard_eq_one] at hst
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := hst; use x; rw [← diff_union_of_subset h, hx, singleton_union]
theorem exists_subset_encard_eq {k : ℕ∞} (hk : k ≤ s.encard) : ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ t.encard = k := by
revert hk
refine ENat.nat_induction k (fun _ ↦ ⟨∅, empty_subset _, by simp⟩) (fun n IH hle ↦ ?_) ?_
· obtain ⟨t₀, ht₀s, ht₀⟩ := IH (le_trans (by simp) hle)
simp only [Nat.cast_succ] at *
have hne : t₀ ≠ s := by
rintro rfl; rw [ht₀, ← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_le] at hle; simp at hle
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_of_ssubset (ht₀s.ssubset_of_ne hne)
exact ⟨insert x t₀, insert_subset hx.1 ht₀s, by rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem hx.2, ht₀]⟩
simp only [top_le_iff, encard_eq_top_iff]
exact fun _ hi ↦ ⟨s, Subset.rfl, hi⟩
theorem exists_superset_subset_encard_eq {k : ℕ∞}
(hst : s ⊆ t) (hsk : s.encard ≤ k) (hkt : k ≤ t.encard) :
∃ r, s ⊆ r ∧ r ⊆ t ∧ r.encard = k := by
obtain (hs | hs) := eq_or_ne s.encard ⊤
· rw [hs, top_le_iff] at hsk; subst hsk; exact ⟨s, Subset.rfl, hst, hs⟩
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le hsk
obtain ⟨k', hk'⟩ := exists_add_of_le hkt
have hk : k ≤ encard (t \ s) := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset hst, add_comm] at hkt
exact WithTop.le_of_add_le_add_right hs hkt
obtain ⟨r', hr', rfl⟩ := exists_subset_encard_eq hk
refine ⟨s ∪ r', subset_union_left, union_subset hst (hr'.trans diff_subset), ?_⟩
rw [encard_union_eq (disjoint_of_subset_right hr' disjoint_sdiff_right)]
section Function
variable {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β}
theorem InjOn.encard_image (h : InjOn f s) : (f '' s).encard = s.encard := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_image_of_injOn h, encard]
theorem encard_congr (e : s ≃ t) : s.encard = t.encard := by
rw [← encard_univ_coe, ← encard_univ_coe t, encard_univ, encard_univ, ENat.card_congr e]
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.encard_image (hf : f.Injective) (s : Set α) :
(f '' s).encard = s.encard :=
hf.injOn.encard_image
theorem _root_.Function.Embedding.encard_le (e : s ↪ t) : s.encard ≤ t.encard := by
rw [← encard_univ_coe, ← e.injective.encard_image, ← Subtype.coe_injective.encard_image]
exact encard_mono (by simp)
theorem encard_image_le (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : (f '' s).encard ≤ s.encard := by
obtain (h | h) := isEmpty_or_nonempty α
· rw [s.eq_empty_of_isEmpty]; simp
rw [← (f.invFunOn_injOn_image s).encard_image]
apply encard_le_encard
exact f.invFunOn_image_image_subset s
theorem Finite.injOn_of_encard_image_eq (hs : s.Finite) (h : (f '' s).encard = s.encard) :
InjOn f s := by
obtain (h' | hne) := isEmpty_or_nonempty α
· rw [s.eq_empty_of_isEmpty]; simp
rw [← (f.invFunOn_injOn_image s).encard_image] at h
rw [injOn_iff_invFunOn_image_image_eq_self]
exact hs.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' (f.invFunOn_image_image_subset s) h.symm.le
theorem encard_preimage_of_injective_subset_range (hf : f.Injective) (ht : t ⊆ range f) :
(f ⁻¹' t).encard = t.encard := by
rw [← hf.encard_image, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, inter_eq_self_of_subset_left ht]
lemma encard_preimage_of_bijective (hf : f.Bijective) (t : Set β) : (f ⁻¹' t).encard = t.encard :=
encard_preimage_of_injective_subset_range hf.injective (by simp [hf.surjective.range_eq])
theorem encard_le_encard_of_injOn (hf : MapsTo f s t) (f_inj : InjOn f s) :
s.encard ≤ t.encard := by
rw [← f_inj.encard_image]; apply encard_le_encard; rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩; exact hf hx
theorem Finite.exists_injOn_of_encard_le [Nonempty β] {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hs : s.Finite)
(hle : s.encard ≤ t.encard) : ∃ (f : α → β), s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t ∧ InjOn f s := by
classical
obtain (rfl | h | ⟨a, has, -⟩) := s.eq_empty_or_encard_eq_top_or_encard_diff_singleton_lt
· simp
· exact (encard_ne_top_iff.mpr hs h).elim
obtain ⟨b, hbt⟩ := encard_pos.1 ((encard_pos.2 ⟨_, has⟩).trans_le hle)
have hle' : (s \ {a}).encard ≤ (t \ {b}).encard := by
rwa [← WithTop.add_le_add_iff_right WithTop.one_ne_top,
encard_diff_singleton_add_one has, encard_diff_singleton_add_one hbt]
obtain ⟨f₀, hf₀s, hinj⟩ := exists_injOn_of_encard_le hs.diff hle'
simp only [preimage_diff, subset_def, mem_diff, mem_singleton_iff, mem_preimage, and_imp] at hf₀s
use Function.update f₀ a b
rw [← insert_eq_of_mem has, ← insert_diff_singleton, injOn_insert (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl)]
simp only [mem_diff, mem_singleton_iff, not_true, and_false, insert_diff_singleton, subset_def,
mem_insert_iff, mem_preimage, ne_eq, Function.update_apply, forall_eq_or_imp, ite_true, and_imp,
mem_image, ite_eq_left_iff, not_exists, not_and, not_forall, exists_prop, and_iff_right hbt]
refine ⟨?_, ?_, fun x hxs hxa ↦ ⟨hxa, (hf₀s x hxs hxa).2⟩⟩
· rintro x hx; split_ifs with h
· assumption
· exact (hf₀s x hx h).1
exact InjOn.congr hinj (fun x ⟨_, hxa⟩ ↦ by rwa [Function.update_of_ne])
termination_by encard s
theorem Finite.exists_bijOn_of_encard_eq [Nonempty β] (hs : s.Finite) (h : s.encard = t.encard) :
∃ (f : α → β), BijOn f s t := by
obtain ⟨f, hf, hinj⟩ := hs.exists_injOn_of_encard_le h.le; use f
convert hinj.bijOn_image
rw [(hs.image f).eq_of_subset_of_encard_le (image_subset_iff.mpr hf)
(h.symm.trans hinj.encard_image.symm).le]
end Function
section ncard
open Nat
/-- A tactic (for use in default params) that applies `Set.toFinite` to synthesize a `Set.Finite`
term. -/
syntax "toFinite_tac" : tactic
macro_rules
| `(tactic| toFinite_tac) => `(tactic| apply Set.toFinite)
/-- A tactic useful for transferring proofs for `encard` to their corresponding `card` statements -/
syntax "to_encard_tac" : tactic
macro_rules
| `(tactic| to_encard_tac) => `(tactic|
simp only [← Nat.cast_le (α := ℕ∞), ← Nat.cast_inj (R := ℕ∞), Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one])
/-- The cardinality of `s : Set α` . Has the junk value `0` if `s` is infinite -/
noncomputable def ncard (s : Set α) : ℕ := ENat.toNat s.encard
theorem ncard_def (s : Set α) : s.ncard = ENat.toNat s.encard := rfl
theorem Finite.cast_ncard_eq (hs : s.Finite) : s.ncard = s.encard := by
rwa [ncard, ENat.coe_toNat_eq_self, ne_eq, encard_eq_top_iff, Set.Infinite, not_not]
lemma ncard_le_encard (s : Set α) : s.ncard ≤ s.encard := ENat.coe_toNat_le_self _
theorem Nat.card_coe_set_eq (s : Set α) : Nat.card s = s.ncard := by
obtain (h | h) := s.finite_or_infinite
· have := h.fintype
rw [ncard, h.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card,
toFinite_toFinset, toFinset_card, ENat.toNat_coe]
have := infinite_coe_iff.2 h
rw [ncard, h.encard_eq, Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite, ENat.toNat_top]
theorem ncard_eq_toFinset_card (s : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard = hs.toFinset.card := by
rw [← Nat.card_coe_set_eq, @Nat.card_eq_fintype_card _ hs.fintype,
@Finite.card_toFinset _ _ hs.fintype hs]
theorem ncard_eq_toFinset_card' (s : Set α) [Fintype s] :
s.ncard = s.toFinset.card := by
simp [← Nat.card_coe_set_eq, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card]
lemma cast_ncard {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) :
(s.ncard : Cardinal) = Cardinal.mk s := @Nat.cast_card _ hs
theorem encard_le_coe_iff_finite_ncard_le {k : ℕ} : s.encard ≤ k ↔ s.Finite ∧ s.ncard ≤ k := by
| rw [encard_le_coe_iff, and_congr_right_iff]
exact fun hfin ↦ ⟨fun ⟨n₀, hn₀, hle⟩ ↦ by rwa [ncard_def, hn₀, ENat.toNat_coe],
fun h ↦ ⟨s.ncard, by rw [hfin.cast_ncard_eq], h⟩⟩
theorem Infinite.ncard (hs : s.Infinite) : s.ncard = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.card_coe_set_eq, @Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite _ hs.to_subtype]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Card.lean | 528 | 533 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.List.Sort
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Functor
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Pigeonhole
import Mathlib.Order.RelSeries
/-!
# Jordan-Hölder Theorem
This file proves the Jordan Hölder theorem for a `JordanHolderLattice`, a class also defined in
this file. Examples of `JordanHolderLattice` include `Subgroup G` if `G` is a group, and
`Submodule R M` if `M` is an `R`-module. Using this approach the theorem need not be proved
separately for both groups and modules, the proof in this file can be applied to both.
## Main definitions
The main definitions in this file are `JordanHolderLattice` and `CompositionSeries`,
and the relation `Equivalent` on `CompositionSeries`
A `JordanHolderLattice` is the class for which the Jordan Hölder theorem is proved. A
Jordan Hölder lattice is a lattice equipped with a notion of maximality, `IsMaximal`, and a notion
of isomorphism of pairs `Iso`. In the example of subgroups of a group, `IsMaximal H K` means that
`H` is a maximal normal subgroup of `K`, and `Iso (H₁, K₁) (H₂, K₂)` means that the quotient
`H₁ / K₁` is isomorphic to the quotient `H₂ / K₂`. `Iso` must be symmetric and transitive and must
satisfy the second isomorphism theorem `Iso (H, H ⊔ K) (H ⊓ K, K)`.
A `CompositionSeries X` is a finite nonempty series of elements of the lattice `X` such that
each element is maximal inside the next. The length of a `CompositionSeries X` is
one less than the number of elements in the series. Note that there is no stipulation
that a series start from the bottom of the lattice and finish at the top.
For a composition series `s`, `s.last` is the largest element of the series,
and `s.head` is the least element.
Two `CompositionSeries X`, `s₁` and `s₂` are equivalent if there is a bijection
`e : Fin s₁.length ≃ Fin s₂.length` such that for any `i`,
`Iso (s₁ i, s₁ i.succ) (s₂ (e i), s₂ (e i.succ))`
## Main theorems
The main theorem is `CompositionSeries.jordan_holder`, which says that if two composition
series have the same least element and the same largest element,
then they are `Equivalent`.
## TODO
Provide instances of `JordanHolderLattice` for subgroups, and potentially for modular lattices.
It is not entirely clear how this should be done. Possibly there should be no global instances
of `JordanHolderLattice`, and the instances should only be defined locally in order to prove
the Jordan-Hölder theorem for modules/groups and the API should be transferred because many of the
theorems in this file will have stronger versions for modules. There will also need to be an API for
mapping composition series across homomorphisms. It is also probably possible to
provide an instance of `JordanHolderLattice` for any `ModularLattice`, and in this case the
Jordan-Hölder theorem will say that there is a well defined notion of length of a modular lattice.
However an instance of `JordanHolderLattice` for a modular lattice will not be able to contain
the correct notion of isomorphism for modules, so a separate instance for modules will still be
required and this will clash with the instance for modular lattices, and so at least one of these
instances should not be a global instance.
> [!NOTE]
> The previous paragraph indicates that the instance of `JordanHolderLattice` for submodules should
> be obtained via `ModularLattice`. This is not the case in `mathlib4`.
> See `JordanHolderModule.instJordanHolderLattice`.
-/
universe u
open Set RelSeries
/-- A `JordanHolderLattice` is the class for which the Jordan Hölder theorem is proved. A
Jordan Hölder lattice is a lattice equipped with a notion of maximality, `IsMaximal`, and a notion
of isomorphism of pairs `Iso`. In the example of subgroups of a group, `IsMaximal H K` means that
`H` is a maximal normal subgroup of `K`, and `Iso (H₁, K₁) (H₂, K₂)` means that the quotient
`H₁ / K₁` is isomorphic to the quotient `H₂ / K₂`. `Iso` must be symmetric and transitive and must
satisfy the second isomorphism theorem `Iso (H, H ⊔ K) (H ⊓ K, K)`.
Examples include `Subgroup G` if `G` is a group, and `Submodule R M` if `M` is an `R`-module.
-/
class JordanHolderLattice (X : Type u) [Lattice X] where
IsMaximal : X → X → Prop
lt_of_isMaximal : ∀ {x y}, IsMaximal x y → x < y
sup_eq_of_isMaximal : ∀ {x y z}, IsMaximal x z → IsMaximal y z → x ≠ y → x ⊔ y = z
isMaximal_inf_left_of_isMaximal_sup :
∀ {x y}, IsMaximal x (x ⊔ y) → IsMaximal y (x ⊔ y) → IsMaximal (x ⊓ y) x
Iso : X × X → X × X → Prop
iso_symm : ∀ {x y}, Iso x y → Iso y x
iso_trans : ∀ {x y z}, Iso x y → Iso y z → Iso x z
second_iso : ∀ {x y}, IsMaximal x (x ⊔ y) → Iso (x, x ⊔ y) (x ⊓ y, y)
namespace JordanHolderLattice
variable {X : Type u} [Lattice X] [JordanHolderLattice X]
theorem isMaximal_inf_right_of_isMaximal_sup {x y : X} (hxz : IsMaximal x (x ⊔ y))
(hyz : IsMaximal y (x ⊔ y)) : IsMaximal (x ⊓ y) y := by
rw [inf_comm]
rw [sup_comm] at hxz hyz
exact isMaximal_inf_left_of_isMaximal_sup hyz hxz
theorem isMaximal_of_eq_inf (x b : X) {a y : X} (ha : x ⊓ y = a) (hxy : x ≠ y) (hxb : IsMaximal x b)
(hyb : IsMaximal y b) : IsMaximal a y := by
have hb : x ⊔ y = b := sup_eq_of_isMaximal hxb hyb hxy
substs a b
exact isMaximal_inf_right_of_isMaximal_sup hxb hyb
theorem second_iso_of_eq {x y a b : X} (hm : IsMaximal x a) (ha : x ⊔ y = a) (hb : x ⊓ y = b) :
Iso (x, a) (b, y) := by substs a b; exact second_iso hm
theorem IsMaximal.iso_refl {x y : X} (h : IsMaximal x y) : Iso (x, y) (x, y) :=
second_iso_of_eq h (sup_eq_right.2 (le_of_lt (lt_of_isMaximal h)))
(inf_eq_left.2 (le_of_lt (lt_of_isMaximal h)))
end JordanHolderLattice
open JordanHolderLattice
attribute [symm] iso_symm
attribute [trans] iso_trans
/-- A `CompositionSeries X` is a finite nonempty series of elements of a
`JordanHolderLattice` such that each element is maximal inside the next. The length of a
`CompositionSeries X` is one less than the number of elements in the series.
Note that there is no stipulation that a series start from the bottom of the lattice and finish at
the top. For a composition series `s`, `s.last` is the largest element of the series,
and `s.head` is the least element.
-/
abbrev CompositionSeries (X : Type u) [Lattice X] [JordanHolderLattice X] : Type u :=
RelSeries (IsMaximal (X := X))
namespace CompositionSeries
variable {X : Type u} [Lattice X] [JordanHolderLattice X]
theorem lt_succ (s : CompositionSeries X) (i : Fin s.length) :
s (Fin.castSucc i) < s (Fin.succ i) :=
lt_of_isMaximal (s.step _)
protected theorem strictMono (s : CompositionSeries X) : StrictMono s :=
Fin.strictMono_iff_lt_succ.2 s.lt_succ
protected theorem injective (s : CompositionSeries X) : Function.Injective s :=
s.strictMono.injective
@[simp]
protected theorem inj (s : CompositionSeries X) {i j : Fin s.length.succ} : s i = s j ↔ i = j :=
s.injective.eq_iff
theorem total {s : CompositionSeries X} {x y : X} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : x ≤ y ∨ y ≤ x := by
rcases Set.mem_range.1 hx with ⟨i, rfl⟩
rcases Set.mem_range.1 hy with ⟨j, rfl⟩
rw [s.strictMono.le_iff_le, s.strictMono.le_iff_le]
exact le_total i j
theorem toList_sorted (s : CompositionSeries X) : s.toList.Sorted (· < ·) :=
List.pairwise_iff_get.2 fun i j h => by
dsimp only [RelSeries.toList]
rw [List.get_ofFn, List.get_ofFn]
exact s.strictMono h
theorem toList_nodup (s : CompositionSeries X) : s.toList.Nodup :=
s.toList_sorted.nodup
/-- Two `CompositionSeries` are equal if they have the same elements. See also `ext_fun`. -/
@[ext]
theorem ext {s₁ s₂ : CompositionSeries X} (h : ∀ x, x ∈ s₁ ↔ x ∈ s₂) : s₁ = s₂ :=
toList_injective <|
List.eq_of_perm_of_sorted
(by
classical
exact List.perm_of_nodup_nodup_toFinset_eq s₁.toList_nodup s₂.toList_nodup
(Finset.ext <| by simpa only [List.mem_toFinset, RelSeries.mem_toList]))
s₁.toList_sorted s₂.toList_sorted
@[simp]
theorem le_last {s : CompositionSeries X} (i : Fin (s.length + 1)) : s i ≤ s.last :=
s.strictMono.monotone (Fin.le_last _)
theorem le_last_of_mem {s : CompositionSeries X} {x : X} (hx : x ∈ s) : x ≤ s.last :=
let ⟨_i, hi⟩ := Set.mem_range.2 hx
hi ▸ le_last _
@[simp]
theorem head_le {s : CompositionSeries X} (i : Fin (s.length + 1)) : s.head ≤ s i :=
s.strictMono.monotone (Fin.zero_le _)
theorem head_le_of_mem {s : CompositionSeries X} {x : X} (hx : x ∈ s) : s.head ≤ x :=
let ⟨_i, hi⟩ := Set.mem_range.2 hx
hi ▸ head_le _
theorem last_eraseLast_le (s : CompositionSeries X) : s.eraseLast.last ≤ s.last := by
simp [eraseLast, last, s.strictMono.le_iff_le, Fin.le_iff_val_le_val]
theorem mem_eraseLast_of_ne_of_mem {s : CompositionSeries X} {x : X}
(hx : x ≠ s.last) (hxs : x ∈ s) : x ∈ s.eraseLast := by
rcases hxs with ⟨i, rfl⟩
have hi : (i : ℕ) < (s.length - 1).succ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← Nat.succ_sub (length_pos_of_nontrivial ⟨_, ⟨i, rfl⟩, _, s.last_mem, hx⟩),
Nat.add_one_sub_one]
exact lt_of_le_of_ne (Nat.le_of_lt_succ i.2) (by simpa [last, s.inj, Fin.ext_iff] using hx)
refine ⟨Fin.castSucc (n := s.length + 1) i, ?_⟩
simp [Fin.ext_iff, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hi]
theorem mem_eraseLast {s : CompositionSeries X} {x : X} (h : 0 < s.length) :
x ∈ s.eraseLast ↔ x ≠ s.last ∧ x ∈ s := by
simp only [RelSeries.mem_def, eraseLast]
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, rfl⟩
have hi : (i : ℕ) < s.length := by
conv_rhs => rw [← Nat.add_one_sub_one s.length, Nat.succ_sub h]
exact i.2
simp [last, Fin.ext_iff, ne_of_lt hi, -Set.mem_range, Set.mem_range_self]
· intro h
exact mem_eraseLast_of_ne_of_mem h.1 h.2
theorem lt_last_of_mem_eraseLast {s : CompositionSeries X} {x : X} (h : 0 < s.length)
(hx : x ∈ s.eraseLast) : x < s.last :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (le_last_of_mem ((mem_eraseLast h).1 hx).2) ((mem_eraseLast h).1 hx).1
theorem isMaximal_eraseLast_last {s : CompositionSeries X} (h : 0 < s.length) :
IsMaximal s.eraseLast.last s.last := by
have : s.length - 1 + 1 = s.length := by
conv_rhs => rw [← Nat.add_one_sub_one s.length]; rw [Nat.succ_sub h]
rw [last_eraseLast, last]
convert s.step ⟨s.length - 1, by omega⟩; ext; simp [this]
theorem eq_snoc_eraseLast {s : CompositionSeries X} (h : 0 < s.length) :
s = snoc (eraseLast s) s.last (isMaximal_eraseLast_last h) := by
ext x
simp only [mem_snoc, mem_eraseLast h, ne_eq]
by_cases h : x = s.last <;> simp [*, s.last_mem]
@[simp]
theorem snoc_eraseLast_last {s : CompositionSeries X} (h : IsMaximal s.eraseLast.last s.last) :
s.eraseLast.snoc s.last h = s :=
have h : 0 < s.length :=
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero (fun hs => ne_of_gt (lt_of_isMaximal h) <| by simp [last, Fin.ext_iff, hs])
(eq_snoc_eraseLast h).symm
/-- Two `CompositionSeries X`, `s₁` and `s₂` are equivalent if there is a bijection
`e : Fin s₁.length ≃ Fin s₂.length` such that for any `i`,
`Iso (s₁ i) (s₁ i.succ) (s₂ (e i), s₂ (e i.succ))` -/
def Equivalent (s₁ s₂ : CompositionSeries X) : Prop :=
∃ f : Fin s₁.length ≃ Fin s₂.length,
∀ i : Fin s₁.length, Iso (s₁ (Fin.castSucc i), s₁ i.succ)
(s₂ (Fin.castSucc (f i)), s₂ (Fin.succ (f i)))
namespace Equivalent
@[refl]
theorem refl (s : CompositionSeries X) : Equivalent s s :=
⟨Equiv.refl _, fun _ => (s.step _).iso_refl⟩
@[symm]
theorem symm {s₁ s₂ : CompositionSeries X} (h : Equivalent s₁ s₂) : Equivalent s₂ s₁ :=
⟨h.choose.symm, fun i => iso_symm (by simpa using h.choose_spec (h.choose.symm i))⟩
@[trans]
theorem trans {s₁ s₂ s₃ : CompositionSeries X} (h₁ : Equivalent s₁ s₂) (h₂ : Equivalent s₂ s₃) :
Equivalent s₁ s₃ :=
⟨h₁.choose.trans h₂.choose,
fun i => iso_trans (h₁.choose_spec i) (h₂.choose_spec (h₁.choose i))⟩
protected theorem smash {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : CompositionSeries X}
(hs : s₁.last = s₂.head) (ht : t₁.last = t₂.head)
(h₁ : Equivalent s₁ t₁) (h₂ : Equivalent s₂ t₂) :
Equivalent (smash s₁ s₂ hs) (smash t₁ t₂ ht) :=
let e : Fin (s₁.length + s₂.length) ≃ Fin (t₁.length + t₂.length) :=
calc
Fin (s₁.length + s₂.length) ≃ (Fin s₁.length) ⊕ (Fin s₂.length) := finSumFinEquiv.symm
_ ≃ (Fin t₁.length) ⊕ (Fin t₂.length) := Equiv.sumCongr h₁.choose h₂.choose
_ ≃ Fin (t₁.length + t₂.length) := finSumFinEquiv
⟨e, by
intro i
refine Fin.addCases ?_ ?_ i
· intro i
simpa [e, smash_castAdd, smash_succ_castAdd] using h₁.choose_spec i
· intro i
simpa [e, smash_natAdd, smash_succ_natAdd] using h₂.choose_spec i⟩
protected theorem snoc {s₁ s₂ : CompositionSeries X} {x₁ x₂ : X} {hsat₁ : IsMaximal s₁.last x₁}
{hsat₂ : IsMaximal s₂.last x₂} (hequiv : Equivalent s₁ s₂)
(hlast : Iso (s₁.last, x₁) (s₂.last, x₂)) : Equivalent (s₁.snoc x₁ hsat₁) (s₂.snoc x₂ hsat₂) :=
let e : Fin s₁.length.succ ≃ Fin s₂.length.succ :=
calc
Fin (s₁.length + 1) ≃ Option (Fin s₁.length) := finSuccEquivLast
_ ≃ Option (Fin s₂.length) := Functor.mapEquiv Option hequiv.choose
_ ≃ Fin (s₂.length + 1) := finSuccEquivLast.symm
⟨e, fun i => by
refine Fin.lastCases ?_ ?_ i
· simpa [e, apply_last] using hlast
· intro i
simpa [e, Fin.succ_castSucc] using hequiv.choose_spec i⟩
theorem length_eq {s₁ s₂ : CompositionSeries X} (h : Equivalent s₁ s₂) : s₁.length = s₂.length := by
simpa using Fintype.card_congr h.choose
theorem snoc_snoc_swap {s : CompositionSeries X} {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : X} {hsat₁ : IsMaximal s.last x₁}
{hsat₂ : IsMaximal s.last x₂} {hsaty₁ : IsMaximal (snoc s x₁ hsat₁).last y₁}
{hsaty₂ : IsMaximal (snoc s x₂ hsat₂).last y₂} (hr₁ : Iso (s.last, x₁) (x₂, y₂))
(hr₂ : Iso (x₁, y₁) (s.last, x₂)) :
Equivalent (snoc (snoc s x₁ hsat₁) y₁ hsaty₁) (snoc (snoc s x₂ hsat₂) y₂ hsaty₂) :=
let e : Fin (s.length + 1 + 1) ≃ Fin (s.length + 1 + 1) :=
Equiv.swap (Fin.last _) (Fin.castSucc (Fin.last _))
have h1 : ∀ {i : Fin s.length},
(Fin.castSucc (Fin.castSucc i)) ≠ (Fin.castSucc (Fin.last _)) := by simp
have h2 : ∀ {i : Fin s.length}, (Fin.castSucc (Fin.castSucc i)) ≠ Fin.last _ := by simp
⟨e, by
intro i
dsimp only [e]
refine Fin.lastCases ?_ (fun i => ?_) i
· erw [Equiv.swap_apply_left, snoc_castSucc,
show (snoc s x₁ hsat₁).toFun (Fin.last _) = x₁ from last_snoc _ _ _, Fin.succ_last,
show ((s.snoc x₁ hsat₁).snoc y₁ hsaty₁).toFun (Fin.last _) = y₁ from last_snoc _ _ _,
snoc_castSucc, snoc_castSucc, Fin.succ_castSucc, snoc_castSucc, Fin.succ_last,
show (s.snoc _ hsat₂).toFun (Fin.last _) = x₂ from last_snoc _ _ _]
exact hr₂
· refine Fin.lastCases ?_ (fun i => ?_) i
· erw [Equiv.swap_apply_right, snoc_castSucc, snoc_castSucc, snoc_castSucc,
Fin.succ_castSucc, snoc_castSucc, Fin.succ_last, last_snoc', last_snoc', last_snoc']
exact hr₁
· erw [Equiv.swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne h2 h1, snoc_castSucc, snoc_castSucc,
snoc_castSucc, snoc_castSucc, Fin.succ_castSucc, snoc_castSucc,
Fin.succ_castSucc, snoc_castSucc, snoc_castSucc, snoc_castSucc]
exact (s.step i).iso_refl⟩
end Equivalent
theorem length_eq_zero_of_head_eq_head_of_last_eq_last_of_length_eq_zero
{s₁ s₂ : CompositionSeries X} (hb : s₁.head = s₂.head)
(ht : s₁.last = s₂.last) (hs₁ : s₁.length = 0) : s₂.length = 0 := by
have : Fin.last s₂.length = (0 : Fin s₂.length.succ) :=
s₂.injective (hb.symm.trans ((congr_arg s₁ (Fin.ext (by simp [hs₁]))).trans ht)).symm
simpa [Fin.ext_iff]
theorem length_pos_of_head_eq_head_of_last_eq_last_of_length_pos {s₁ s₂ : CompositionSeries X}
(hb : s₁.head = s₂.head) (ht : s₁.last = s₂.last) : 0 < s₁.length → 0 < s₂.length :=
not_imp_not.1
(by
simpa only [pos_iff_ne_zero, ne_eq, Decidable.not_not] using
length_eq_zero_of_head_eq_head_of_last_eq_last_of_length_eq_zero hb.symm ht.symm)
theorem eq_of_head_eq_head_of_last_eq_last_of_length_eq_zero {s₁ s₂ : CompositionSeries X}
(hb : s₁.head = s₂.head) (ht : s₁.last = s₂.last) (hs₁0 : s₁.length = 0) : s₁ = s₂ := by
have : ∀ x, x ∈ s₁ ↔ x = s₁.last := fun x =>
⟨fun hx => subsingleton_of_length_eq_zero hs₁0 hx s₁.last_mem, fun hx => hx.symm ▸ s₁.last_mem⟩
have : ∀ x, x ∈ s₂ ↔ x = s₂.last := fun x =>
⟨fun hx =>
subsingleton_of_length_eq_zero
(length_eq_zero_of_head_eq_head_of_last_eq_last_of_length_eq_zero hb ht
hs₁0) hx s₂.last_mem,
fun hx => hx.symm ▸ s₂.last_mem⟩
ext
simp [*]
/-- Given a `CompositionSeries`, `s`, and an element `x`
such that `x` is maximal inside `s.last` there is a series, `t`,
such that `t.last = x`, `t.head = s.head`
and `snoc t s.last _` is equivalent to `s`. -/
theorem exists_last_eq_snoc_equivalent (s : CompositionSeries X) (x : X) (hm : IsMaximal x s.last)
(hb : s.head ≤ x) :
∃ t : CompositionSeries X,
t.head = s.head ∧ t.length + 1 = s.length ∧
∃ htx : t.last = x,
Equivalent s (snoc t s.last (show IsMaximal t.last _ from htx.symm ▸ hm)) := by
induction' hn : s.length with n ih generalizing s x
· exact
(ne_of_gt (lt_of_le_of_lt hb (lt_of_isMaximal hm))
(subsingleton_of_length_eq_zero hn s.last_mem s.head_mem)).elim
· have h0s : 0 < s.length := hn.symm ▸ Nat.succ_pos _
by_cases hetx : s.eraseLast.last = x
· use s.eraseLast
| simp [← hetx, hn, Equivalent.refl]
· have imxs : IsMaximal (x ⊓ s.eraseLast.last) s.eraseLast.last :=
isMaximal_of_eq_inf x s.last rfl (Ne.symm hetx) hm (isMaximal_eraseLast_last h0s)
have := ih _ _ imxs (le_inf (by simpa) (le_last_of_mem s.eraseLast.head_mem)) (by simp [hn])
rcases this with ⟨t, htb, htl, htt, hteqv⟩
have hmtx : IsMaximal t.last x :=
isMaximal_of_eq_inf s.eraseLast.last s.last (by rw [inf_comm, htt]) hetx
(isMaximal_eraseLast_last h0s) hm
use snoc t x hmtx
refine ⟨by simp [htb], by simp [htl], by simp, ?_⟩
have : s.Equivalent ((snoc t s.eraseLast.last <| show IsMaximal t.last _ from
htt.symm ▸ imxs).snoc s.last
(by simpa using isMaximal_eraseLast_last h0s)) := by
| Mathlib/Order/JordanHolder.lean | 378 | 390 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.Basic
/-!
# Unbounded lattice homomorphisms
This file defines unbounded lattice homomorphisms. _Bounded_ lattice homomorphisms are defined in
`Mathlib.Order.Hom.BoundedLattice`.
We use the `DFunLike` design, so each type of morphisms has a companion typeclass which is meant to
be satisfied by itself and all stricter types.
## Types of morphisms
* `SupHom`: Maps which preserve `⊔`.
* `InfHom`: Maps which preserve `⊓`.
* `LatticeHom`: Lattice homomorphisms. Maps which preserve `⊔` and `⊓`.
## Typeclasses
* `SupHomClass`
* `InfHomClass`
* `LatticeHomClass`
-/
open Function
variable {F α β γ δ : Type*}
/-- The type of `⊔`-preserving functions from `α` to `β`. -/
structure SupHom (α β : Type*) [Max α] [Max β] where
/-- The underlying function of a `SupHom`.
Do not use this function directly. Instead use the coercion coming from the `FunLike`
instance. -/
toFun : α → β
/-- A `SupHom` preserves suprema.
Do not use this directly. Use `map_sup` instead. -/
map_sup' (a b : α) : toFun (a ⊔ b) = toFun a ⊔ toFun b
/-- The type of `⊓`-preserving functions from `α` to `β`. -/
structure InfHom (α β : Type*) [Min α] [Min β] where
/-- The underlying function of an `InfHom`.
Do not use this function directly. Instead use the coercion coming from the `FunLike`
instance. -/
toFun : α → β
/-- An `InfHom` preserves infima.
Do not use this directly. Use `map_inf` instead. -/
map_inf' (a b : α) : toFun (a ⊓ b) = toFun a ⊓ toFun b
/-- The type of lattice homomorphisms from `α` to `β`. -/
structure LatticeHom (α β : Type*) [Lattice α] [Lattice β] extends SupHom α β where
/-- A `LatticeHom` preserves infima.
Do not use this directly. Use `map_inf` instead. -/
map_inf' (a b : α) : toFun (a ⊓ b) = toFun a ⊓ toFun b
-- TODO: remove this configuration and use the default configuration.
initialize_simps_projections LatticeHom (+toSupHom, -toFun)
section
/-- `SupHomClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of `⊔`-preserving morphisms.
You should extend this class when you extend `SupHom`. -/
class SupHomClass (F α β : Type*) [Max α] [Max β] [FunLike F α β] : Prop where
/-- A `SupHomClass` morphism preserves suprema. -/
map_sup (f : F) (a b : α) : f (a ⊔ b) = f a ⊔ f b
/-- `InfHomClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of `⊓`-preserving morphisms.
You should extend this class when you extend `InfHom`. -/
class InfHomClass (F α β : Type*) [Min α] [Min β] [FunLike F α β] : Prop where
/-- An `InfHomClass` morphism preserves infima. -/
map_inf (f : F) (a b : α) : f (a ⊓ b) = f a ⊓ f b
/-- `LatticeHomClass F α β` states that `F` is a type of lattice morphisms.
You should extend this class when you extend `LatticeHom`. -/
class LatticeHomClass (F α β : Type*) [Lattice α] [Lattice β] [FunLike F α β] : Prop
extends SupHomClass F α β where
/-- A `LatticeHomClass` morphism preserves infima. -/
map_inf (f : F) (a b : α) : f (a ⊓ b) = f a ⊓ f b
end
export SupHomClass (map_sup)
export InfHomClass (map_inf)
attribute [simp] map_sup map_inf
section Hom
variable [FunLike F α β]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) SupHomClass.toOrderHomClass [SemilatticeSup α] [SemilatticeSup β]
[SupHomClass F α β] : OrderHomClass F α β :=
{ ‹SupHomClass F α β› with
map_rel := fun f a b h => by rw [← sup_eq_right, ← map_sup, sup_eq_right.2 h] }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) InfHomClass.toOrderHomClass [SemilatticeInf α] [SemilatticeInf β]
[InfHomClass F α β] : OrderHomClass F α β :=
{ ‹InfHomClass F α β› with
map_rel := fun f a b h => by rw [← inf_eq_left, ← map_inf, inf_eq_left.2 h] }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) LatticeHomClass.toInfHomClass [Lattice α] [Lattice β]
[LatticeHomClass F α β] : InfHomClass F α β :=
{ ‹LatticeHomClass F α β› with }
end Hom
section Equiv
variable [EquivLike F α β]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) OrderIsoClass.toSupHomClass [SemilatticeSup α] [SemilatticeSup β]
[OrderIsoClass F α β] : SupHomClass F α β :=
{ show OrderHomClass F α β from inferInstance with
map_sup := fun f a b =>
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => by simp only [← le_map_inv_iff, sup_le_iff] }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) OrderIsoClass.toInfHomClass [SemilatticeInf α] [SemilatticeInf β]
[OrderIsoClass F α β] : InfHomClass F α β :=
{ show OrderHomClass F α β from inferInstance with
map_inf := fun f a b =>
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun c => by simp only [← map_inv_le_iff, le_inf_iff] }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) OrderIsoClass.toLatticeHomClass [Lattice α] [Lattice β]
[OrderIsoClass F α β] : LatticeHomClass F α β :=
{ OrderIsoClass.toSupHomClass, OrderIsoClass.toInfHomClass with }
end Equiv
section OrderEmbedding
variable [FunLike F α β]
/-- We can regard an injective map preserving binary infima as an order embedding. -/
@[simps! apply]
def orderEmbeddingOfInjective [SemilatticeInf α] [SemilatticeInf β] (f : F) [InfHomClass F α β]
(hf : Injective f) : α ↪o β :=
OrderEmbedding.ofMapLEIff f (fun x y ↦ by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ OrderHomClass.mono f h⟩
rwa [← inf_eq_left, ← hf.eq_iff, map_inf, inf_eq_left])
end OrderEmbedding
variable [FunLike F α β]
instance [Max α] [Max β] [SupHomClass F α β] : CoeTC F (SupHom α β) :=
⟨fun f => ⟨f, map_sup f⟩⟩
instance [Min α] [Min β] [InfHomClass F α β] : CoeTC F (InfHom α β) :=
⟨fun f => ⟨f, map_inf f⟩⟩
instance [Lattice α] [Lattice β] [LatticeHomClass F α β] : CoeTC F (LatticeHom α β) :=
⟨fun f =>
{ toFun := f
map_sup' := map_sup f
map_inf' := map_inf f }⟩
/-! ### Supremum homomorphisms -/
namespace SupHom
variable [Max α]
section Sup
variable [Max β] [Max γ] [Max δ]
instance : FunLike (SupHom α β) α β where
coe := SupHom.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by cases f; cases g; congr
instance : SupHomClass (SupHom α β) α β where
map_sup := SupHom.map_sup'
@[simp] lemma toFun_eq_coe (f : SupHom α β) : f.toFun = f := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_mk (f : α → β) (hf) : ⇑(mk f hf) = f := rfl
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : SupHom α β} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g h
/-- Copy of a `SupHom` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
protected def copy (f : SupHom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : SupHom α β where
toFun := f'
map_sup' := h.symm ▸ f.map_sup'
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (f : SupHom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : ⇑(f.copy f' h) = f' :=
rfl
theorem copy_eq (f : SupHom α β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = f) : f.copy f' h = f :=
DFunLike.ext' h
variable (α)
/-- `id` as a `SupHom`. -/
protected def id : SupHom α α :=
⟨id, fun _ _ => rfl⟩
instance : Inhabited (SupHom α α) :=
⟨SupHom.id α⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_id : ⇑(SupHom.id α) = id :=
rfl
variable {α}
@[simp]
theorem id_apply (a : α) : SupHom.id α a = a :=
rfl
/-- Composition of `SupHom`s as a `SupHom`. -/
def comp (f : SupHom β γ) (g : SupHom α β) : SupHom α γ where
toFun := f ∘ g
map_sup' a b := by rw [comp_apply, map_sup, map_sup]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp (f : SupHom β γ) (g : SupHom α β) : (f.comp g : α → γ) = f ∘ g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply (f : SupHom β γ) (g : SupHom α β) (a : α) : (f.comp g) a = f (g a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_assoc (f : SupHom γ δ) (g : SupHom β γ) (h : SupHom α β) :
(f.comp g).comp h = f.comp (g.comp h) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem comp_id (f : SupHom α β) : f.comp (SupHom.id α) = f := rfl
@[simp] theorem id_comp (f : SupHom α β) : (SupHom.id β).comp f = f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem cancel_right {g₁ g₂ : SupHom β γ} {f : SupHom α β} (hf : Surjective f) :
g₁.comp f = g₂.comp f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
⟨fun h => SupHom.ext <| hf.forall.2 <| DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h, fun h => congr_arg₂ _ h rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem cancel_left {g : SupHom β γ} {f₁ f₂ : SupHom α β} (hg : Injective g) :
g.comp f₁ = g.comp f₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ :=
⟨fun h => SupHom.ext fun a => hg <| by rw [← SupHom.comp_apply, h, SupHom.comp_apply],
congr_arg _⟩
end Sup
variable (α) [SemilatticeSup β]
/-- The constant function as a `SupHom`. -/
def const (b : β) : SupHom α β := ⟨fun _ ↦ b, fun _ _ ↦ (sup_idem _).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_const (b : β) : ⇑(const α b) = Function.const α b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem const_apply (b : β) (a : α) : const α b a = b :=
rfl
variable {α}
instance : Max (SupHom α β) :=
⟨fun f g =>
⟨f ⊔ g, fun a b => by
rw [Pi.sup_apply, map_sup, map_sup]
exact sup_sup_sup_comm _ _ _ _⟩⟩
instance : SemilatticeSup (SupHom α β) :=
(DFunLike.coe_injective.semilatticeSup _) fun _ _ => rfl
instance [Bot β] : Bot (SupHom α β) :=
⟨SupHom.const α ⊥⟩
instance [Top β] : Top (SupHom α β) :=
⟨SupHom.const α ⊤⟩
instance [OrderBot β] : OrderBot (SupHom α β) :=
OrderBot.lift ((↑) : _ → α → β) (fun _ _ => id) rfl
instance [OrderTop β] : OrderTop (SupHom α β) :=
OrderTop.lift ((↑) : _ → α → β) (fun _ _ => id) rfl
instance [BoundedOrder β] : BoundedOrder (SupHom α β) :=
BoundedOrder.lift ((↑) : _ → α → β) (fun _ _ => id) rfl rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_sup (f g : SupHom α β) : DFunLike.coe (f ⊔ g) = f ⊔ g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_bot [Bot β] : ⇑(⊥ : SupHom α β) = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_top [Top β] : ⇑(⊤ : SupHom α β) = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
| theorem sup_apply (f g : SupHom α β) (a : α) : (f ⊔ g) a = f a ⊔ g a :=
rfl
| Mathlib/Order/Hom/Lattice.lean | 322 | 323 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Real
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.IndicatorFunction
/-!
# The dominated convergence theorem
This file collects various results related to the Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem
for the Bochner integral.
## Main results
- `MeasureTheory.tendsto_integral_of_dominated_convergence`:
the Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem for the Bochner integral
- `MeasureTheory.hasSum_integral_of_dominated_convergence`:
the Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem for series
- `MeasureTheory.integral_tsum`, `MeasureTheory.integral_tsum_of_summable_integral_norm`:
the integral and `tsum`s commute, if the norms of the functions form a summable series
- `intervalIntegral.hasSum_integral_of_dominated_convergence`: the Lebesgue dominated convergence
theorem for parametric interval integrals
- `intervalIntegral.continuous_of_dominated_interval`: continuity of the interval integral
w.r.t. a parameter
- `intervalIntegral.continuous_primitive` and friends: primitives of interval integrable
measurable functions are continuous
-/
open MeasureTheory Metric
/-!
## The Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem for the Bochner integral
-/
section DominatedConvergenceTheorem
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace ENNReal
open scoped Topology Interval
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α E G : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace ℝ G]
{m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
/-- **Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem** provides sufficient conditions under which almost
everywhere convergence of a sequence of functions implies the convergence of their integrals.
We could weaken the condition `bound_integrable` to require `HasFiniteIntegral bound μ` instead
(i.e. not requiring that `bound` is measurable), but in all applications proving integrability
is easier. -/
theorem tendsto_integral_of_dominated_convergence {F : ℕ → α → G} {f : α → G} (bound : α → ℝ)
(F_measurable : ∀ n, AEStronglyMeasurable (F n) μ) (bound_integrable : Integrable bound μ)
(h_bound : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖F n a‖ ≤ bound a)
(h_lim : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => F n a) atTop (𝓝 (f a))) :
Tendsto (fun n => ∫ a, F n a ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 <| ∫ a, f a ∂μ) := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact tendsto_setToFun_of_dominated_convergence (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
bound F_measurable bound_integrable h_bound h_lim
· simp [integral, hG]
/-- Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem for filters with a countable basis -/
theorem tendsto_integral_filter_of_dominated_convergence {ι} {l : Filter ι} [l.IsCountablyGenerated]
{F : ι → α → G} {f : α → G} (bound : α → ℝ) (hF_meas : ∀ᶠ n in l, AEStronglyMeasurable (F n) μ)
(h_bound : ∀ᶠ n in l, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖F n a‖ ≤ bound a) (bound_integrable : Integrable bound μ)
(h_lim : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => F n a) l (𝓝 (f a))) :
Tendsto (fun n => ∫ a, F n a ∂μ) l (𝓝 <| ∫ a, f a ∂μ) := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact tendsto_setToFun_filter_of_dominated_convergence (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
bound hF_meas h_bound bound_integrable h_lim
· simp [integral, hG, tendsto_const_nhds]
/-- Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem for series. -/
theorem hasSum_integral_of_dominated_convergence {ι} [Countable ι] {F : ι → α → G} {f : α → G}
(bound : ι → α → ℝ) (hF_meas : ∀ n, AEStronglyMeasurable (F n) μ)
(h_bound : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖F n a‖ ≤ bound n a)
(bound_summable : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Summable fun n => bound n a)
(bound_integrable : Integrable (fun a => ∑' n, bound n a) μ)
(h_lim : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, HasSum (fun n => F n a) (f a)) :
HasSum (fun n => ∫ a, F n a ∂μ) (∫ a, f a ∂μ) := by
have hb_nonneg : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ n, 0 ≤ bound n a :=
eventually_countable_forall.2 fun n => (h_bound n).mono fun a => (norm_nonneg _).trans
have hb_le_tsum : ∀ n, bound n ≤ᵐ[μ] fun a => ∑' n, bound n a := by
intro n
filter_upwards [hb_nonneg, bound_summable]
with _ ha0 ha_sum using ha_sum.le_tsum _ fun i _ => ha0 i
have hF_integrable : ∀ n, Integrable (F n) μ := by
refine fun n => bound_integrable.mono' (hF_meas n) ?_
exact EventuallyLE.trans (h_bound n) (hb_le_tsum n)
simp only [HasSum, ← integral_finset_sum _ fun n _ => hF_integrable n]
refine tendsto_integral_filter_of_dominated_convergence
(fun a => ∑' n, bound n a) ?_ ?_ bound_integrable h_lim
· exact Eventually.of_forall fun s => s.aestronglyMeasurable_sum fun n _ => hF_meas n
· filter_upwards with s
filter_upwards [eventually_countable_forall.2 h_bound, hb_nonneg, bound_summable]
with a hFa ha0 has
calc
‖∑ n ∈ s, F n a‖ ≤ ∑ n ∈ s, bound n a := norm_sum_le_of_le _ fun n _ => hFa n
_ ≤ ∑' n, bound n a := has.sum_le_tsum _ (fun n _ => ha0 n)
theorem integral_tsum {ι} [Countable ι] {f : ι → α → G} (hf : ∀ i, AEStronglyMeasurable (f i) μ)
(hf' : ∑' i, ∫⁻ a : α, ‖f i a‖ₑ ∂μ ≠ ∞) :
∫ a : α, ∑' i, f i a ∂μ = ∑' i, ∫ a : α, f i a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G; swap
· simp [integral, hG]
have hf'' i : AEMeasurable (‖f i ·‖ₑ) μ := (hf i).enorm
have hhh : ∀ᵐ a : α ∂μ, Summable fun n => (‖f n a‖₊ : ℝ) := by
rw [← lintegral_tsum hf''] at hf'
refine (ae_lt_top' (AEMeasurable.ennreal_tsum hf'') hf').mono ?_
intro x hx
rw [← ENNReal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable_coe]
exact hx.ne
convert (MeasureTheory.hasSum_integral_of_dominated_convergence (fun i a => ‖f i a‖₊) hf _ hhh
⟨_, _⟩ _).tsum_eq.symm
· intro n
filter_upwards with x
rfl
· simp_rw [← NNReal.coe_tsum]
rw [aestronglyMeasurable_iff_aemeasurable]
apply AEMeasurable.coe_nnreal_real
apply AEMeasurable.nnreal_tsum
exact fun i => (hf i).nnnorm.aemeasurable
· dsimp [HasFiniteIntegral]
have : ∫⁻ a, ∑' n, ‖f n a‖ₑ ∂μ < ⊤ := by rwa [lintegral_tsum hf'', lt_top_iff_ne_top]
convert this using 1
apply lintegral_congr_ae
simp_rw [← coe_nnnorm, ← NNReal.coe_tsum, enorm_eq_nnnorm, NNReal.nnnorm_eq]
filter_upwards [hhh] with a ha
exact ENNReal.coe_tsum (NNReal.summable_coe.mp ha)
· filter_upwards [hhh] with x hx
exact hx.of_norm.hasSum
lemma hasSum_integral_of_summable_integral_norm {ι} [Countable ι] {F : ι → α → E}
(hF_int : ∀ i : ι, Integrable (F i) μ) (hF_sum : Summable fun i ↦ ∫ a, ‖F i a‖ ∂μ) :
HasSum (∫ a, F · a ∂μ) (∫ a, (∑' i, F i a) ∂μ) := by
by_cases hE : CompleteSpace E; swap
· simp [integral, hE, hasSum_zero]
rw [integral_tsum (fun i ↦ (hF_int i).1)]
· exact (hF_sum.of_norm_bounded _ fun i ↦ norm_integral_le_integral_norm _).hasSum
have (i : ι) : ∫⁻ a, ‖F i a‖ₑ ∂μ = ‖∫ a, ‖F i a‖ ∂μ‖ₑ := by
dsimp [enorm]
rw [lintegral_coe_eq_integral _ (hF_int i).norm, coe_nnreal_eq, coe_nnnorm,
Real.norm_of_nonneg (integral_nonneg (fun a ↦ norm_nonneg (F i a)))]
simp only [coe_nnnorm]
rw [funext this]
exact ENNReal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable.2 <| NNReal.summable_coe.1 hF_sum.abs
lemma integral_tsum_of_summable_integral_norm {ι} [Countable ι] {F : ι → α → E}
(hF_int : ∀ i : ι, Integrable (F i) μ) (hF_sum : Summable fun i ↦ ∫ a, ‖F i a‖ ∂μ) :
∑' i, (∫ a, F i a ∂μ) = ∫ a, (∑' i, F i a) ∂μ :=
(hasSum_integral_of_summable_integral_norm hF_int hF_sum).tsum_eq
/-- Corollary of the Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem: If a sequence of functions `F n` is
(eventually) uniformly bounded by a constant and converges (eventually) pointwise to a
function `f`, then the integrals of `F n` with respect to a finite measure `μ` converge
to the integral of `f`. -/
theorem tendsto_integral_filter_of_norm_le_const {ι} {l : Filter ι} [l.IsCountablyGenerated]
{F : ι → α → G} [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : α → G}
(h_meas : ∀ᶠ n in l, AEStronglyMeasurable (F n) μ)
(h_bound : ∃ C, ∀ᶠ n in l, (∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ‖F n ω‖ ≤ C))
(h_lim : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => F n ω) l (𝓝 (f ω))) :
Tendsto (fun n => ∫ ω, F n ω ∂μ) l (nhds (∫ ω, f ω ∂μ)) := by
obtain ⟨c, h_boundc⟩ := h_bound
let C : α → ℝ := (fun _ => c)
exact tendsto_integral_filter_of_dominated_convergence
C h_meas h_boundc (integrable_const c) h_lim
end MeasureTheory
section TendstoMono
variable {α E : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α]
{μ : Measure α} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] {s : ℕ → Set α}
{f : α → E}
theorem _root_.Antitone.tendsto_setIntegral (hsm : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i)) (h_anti : Antitone s)
(hfi : IntegrableOn f (s 0) μ) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫ a in s i, f a ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫ a in ⋂ n, s n, f a ∂μ)) := by
let bound : α → ℝ := indicator (s 0) fun a => ‖f a‖
have h_int_eq : (fun i => ∫ a in s i, f a ∂μ) = fun i => ∫ a, (s i).indicator f a ∂μ :=
funext fun i => (integral_indicator (hsm i)).symm
rw [h_int_eq]
rw [← integral_indicator (MeasurableSet.iInter hsm)]
refine tendsto_integral_of_dominated_convergence bound ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· intro n
rw [aestronglyMeasurable_indicator_iff (hsm n)]
exact (IntegrableOn.mono_set hfi (h_anti (zero_le n))).1
· rw [integrable_indicator_iff (hsm 0)]
exact hfi.norm
· simp_rw [norm_indicator_eq_indicator_norm]
refine fun n => Eventually.of_forall fun x => ?_
exact indicator_le_indicator_of_subset (h_anti (zero_le n)) (fun a => norm_nonneg _) _
· filter_upwards [] with a using le_trans (h_anti.tendsto_indicator _ _ _) (pure_le_nhds _)
end TendstoMono
/-!
## The Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem for interval integrals
As an application, we show continuity of parametric integrals.
-/
namespace intervalIntegral
section DCT
variable {ι E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
{a b : ℝ} {f : ℝ → E} {μ : Measure ℝ}
/-- Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem for filters with a countable basis -/
nonrec theorem tendsto_integral_filter_of_dominated_convergence {ι} {l : Filter ι}
[l.IsCountablyGenerated] {F : ι → ℝ → E} (bound : ℝ → ℝ)
(hF_meas : ∀ᶠ n in l, AEStronglyMeasurable (F n) (μ.restrict (Ι a b)))
(h_bound : ∀ᶠ n in l, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ι a b → ‖F n x‖ ≤ bound x)
(bound_integrable : IntervalIntegrable bound μ a b)
(h_lim : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ι a b → Tendsto (fun n => F n x) l (𝓝 (f x))) :
Tendsto (fun n => ∫ x in a..b, F n x ∂μ) l (𝓝 <| ∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ) := by
simp only [intervalIntegrable_iff, intervalIntegral_eq_integral_uIoc,
← ae_restrict_iff' (α := ℝ) (μ := μ) measurableSet_uIoc] at *
exact tendsto_const_nhds.smul <|
tendsto_integral_filter_of_dominated_convergence bound hF_meas h_bound bound_integrable h_lim
/-- Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem for parametric interval integrals. -/
nonrec theorem hasSum_integral_of_dominated_convergence {ι} [Countable ι] {F : ι → ℝ → E}
(bound : ι → ℝ → ℝ) (hF_meas : ∀ n, AEStronglyMeasurable (F n) (μ.restrict (Ι a b)))
(h_bound : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ t ∂μ, t ∈ Ι a b → ‖F n t‖ ≤ bound n t)
(bound_summable : ∀ᵐ t ∂μ, t ∈ Ι a b → Summable fun n => bound n t)
(bound_integrable : IntervalIntegrable (fun t => ∑' n, bound n t) μ a b)
(h_lim : ∀ᵐ t ∂μ, t ∈ Ι a b → HasSum (fun n => F n t) (f t)) :
HasSum (fun n => ∫ t in a..b, F n t ∂μ) (∫ t in a..b, f t ∂μ) := by
simp only [intervalIntegrable_iff, intervalIntegral_eq_integral_uIoc, ←
ae_restrict_iff' (α := ℝ) (μ := μ) measurableSet_uIoc] at *
exact
(hasSum_integral_of_dominated_convergence bound hF_meas h_bound bound_summable bound_integrable
h_lim).const_smul
_
/-- Interval integrals commute with countable sums, when the supremum norms are summable (a
special case of the dominated convergence theorem). -/
theorem hasSum_intervalIntegral_of_summable_norm [Countable ι] {f : ι → C(ℝ, E)}
(hf_sum : Summable fun i : ι => ‖(f i).restrict (⟨uIcc a b, isCompact_uIcc⟩ : Compacts ℝ)‖) :
HasSum (fun i : ι => ∫ x in a..b, f i x) (∫ x in a..b, ∑' i : ι, f i x) := by
by_cases hE : CompleteSpace E; swap
· simp [intervalIntegral, integral, hE, hasSum_zero]
apply hasSum_integral_of_dominated_convergence
(fun i (x : ℝ) => ‖(f i).restrict ↑(⟨uIcc a b, isCompact_uIcc⟩ : Compacts ℝ)‖)
(fun i => (map_continuous <| f i).aestronglyMeasurable)
· intro i; filter_upwards with x hx
apply ContinuousMap.norm_coe_le_norm ((f i).restrict _) ⟨x, _⟩
exact ⟨hx.1.le, hx.2⟩
· exact ae_of_all _ fun x _ => hf_sum
· exact intervalIntegrable_const
· refine ae_of_all _ fun x hx => Summable.hasSum ?_
let x : (⟨uIcc a b, isCompact_uIcc⟩ : Compacts ℝ) := ⟨x, ⟨hx.1.le, hx.2⟩⟩
have := hf_sum.of_norm
simpa only [Compacts.coe_mk, ContinuousMap.restrict_apply]
using ContinuousMap.summable_apply this x
theorem tsum_intervalIntegral_eq_of_summable_norm [Countable ι] {f : ι → C(ℝ, E)}
(hf_sum : Summable fun i : ι => ‖(f i).restrict (⟨uIcc a b, isCompact_uIcc⟩ : Compacts ℝ)‖) :
∑' i : ι, ∫ x in a..b, f i x = ∫ x in a..b, ∑' i : ι, f i x :=
(hasSum_intervalIntegral_of_summable_norm hf_sum).tsum_eq
variable {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [FirstCountableTopology X]
/-- Continuity of interval integral with respect to a parameter, at a point within a set.
Given `F : X → ℝ → E`, assume `F x` is ae-measurable on `[a, b]` for `x` in a
neighborhood of `x₀` within `s` and at `x₀`, and assume it is bounded by a function integrable
on `[a, b]` independent of `x` in a neighborhood of `x₀` within `s`. If `(fun x ↦ F x t)`
is continuous at `x₀` within `s` for almost every `t` in `[a, b]`
then the same holds for `(fun x ↦ ∫ t in a..b, F x t ∂μ) s x₀`. -/
theorem continuousWithinAt_of_dominated_interval {F : X → ℝ → E} {x₀ : X} {bound : ℝ → ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
{s : Set X} (hF_meas : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] x₀, AEStronglyMeasurable (F x) (μ.restrict <| Ι a b))
(h_bound : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] x₀, ∀ᵐ t ∂μ, t ∈ Ι a b → ‖F x t‖ ≤ bound t)
(bound_integrable : IntervalIntegrable bound μ a b)
(h_cont : ∀ᵐ t ∂μ, t ∈ Ι a b → ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => F x t) s x₀) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => ∫ t in a..b, F x t ∂μ) s x₀ :=
tendsto_integral_filter_of_dominated_convergence bound hF_meas h_bound bound_integrable h_cont
/-- Continuity of interval integral with respect to a parameter at a point.
Given `F : X → ℝ → E`, assume `F x` is ae-measurable on `[a, b]` for `x` in a
neighborhood of `x₀`, and assume it is bounded by a function integrable on
`[a, b]` independent of `x` in a neighborhood of `x₀`. If `(fun x ↦ F x t)`
is continuous at `x₀` for almost every `t` in `[a, b]`
then the same holds for `(fun x ↦ ∫ t in a..b, F x t ∂μ) s x₀`. -/
theorem continuousAt_of_dominated_interval {F : X → ℝ → E} {x₀ : X} {bound : ℝ → ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
(hF_meas : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, AEStronglyMeasurable (F x) (μ.restrict <| Ι a b))
(h_bound : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ᵐ t ∂μ, t ∈ Ι a b → ‖F x t‖ ≤ bound t)
(bound_integrable : IntervalIntegrable bound μ a b)
(h_cont : ∀ᵐ t ∂μ, t ∈ Ι a b → ContinuousAt (fun x => F x t) x₀) :
ContinuousAt (fun x => ∫ t in a..b, F x t ∂μ) x₀ :=
tendsto_integral_filter_of_dominated_convergence bound hF_meas h_bound bound_integrable h_cont
/-- Continuity of interval integral with respect to a parameter.
Given `F : X → ℝ → E`, assume each `F x` is ae-measurable on `[a, b]`,
and assume it is bounded by a function integrable on `[a, b]` independent of `x`.
If `(fun x ↦ F x t)` is continuous for almost every `t` in `[a, b]`
then the same holds for `(fun x ↦ ∫ t in a..b, F x t ∂μ) s x₀`. -/
theorem continuous_of_dominated_interval {F : X → ℝ → E} {bound : ℝ → ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
(hF_meas : ∀ x, AEStronglyMeasurable (F x) <| μ.restrict <| Ι a b)
(h_bound : ∀ x, ∀ᵐ t ∂μ, t ∈ Ι a b → ‖F x t‖ ≤ bound t)
(bound_integrable : IntervalIntegrable bound μ a b)
(h_cont : ∀ᵐ t ∂μ, t ∈ Ι a b → Continuous fun x => F x t) :
Continuous fun x => ∫ t in a..b, F x t ∂μ :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.mpr fun _ =>
continuousAt_of_dominated_interval (Eventually.of_forall hF_meas) (Eventually.of_forall h_bound)
bound_integrable <|
h_cont.mono fun _ himp hx => (himp hx).continuousAt
end DCT
section ContinuousPrimitive
open scoped Interval
variable {E X : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [TopologicalSpace X]
{a b b₀ b₁ b₂ : ℝ} {μ : Measure ℝ} {f : ℝ → E}
theorem continuousWithinAt_primitive (hb₀ : μ {b₀} = 0)
(h_int : IntervalIntegrable f μ (min a b₁) (max a b₂)) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun b => ∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ) (Icc b₁ b₂) b₀ := by
by_cases h₀ : b₀ ∈ Icc b₁ b₂
· have h₁₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂ := h₀.1.trans h₀.2
have min₁₂ : min b₁ b₂ = b₁ := min_eq_left h₁₂
have h_int' : ∀ {x}, x ∈ Icc b₁ b₂ → IntervalIntegrable f μ b₁ x := by
rintro x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
apply h_int.mono_set
apply uIcc_subset_uIcc
· exact ⟨min_le_of_left_le (min_le_right a b₁),
h₁.trans (h₂.trans <| le_max_of_le_right <| le_max_right _ _)⟩
· exact ⟨min_le_of_left_le <| (min_le_right _ _).trans h₁,
le_max_of_le_right <| h₂.trans <| le_max_right _ _⟩
have : ∀ b ∈ Icc b₁ b₂,
∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ = (∫ x in a..b₁, f x ∂μ) + ∫ x in b₁..b, f x ∂μ := by
rintro b ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
rw [← integral_add_adjacent_intervals _ (h_int' ⟨h₁, h₂⟩)]
apply h_int.mono_set
apply uIcc_subset_uIcc
· exact ⟨min_le_of_left_le (min_le_left a b₁), le_max_of_le_right (le_max_left _ _)⟩
· exact ⟨min_le_of_left_le (min_le_right _ _),
le_max_of_le_right (h₁.trans <| h₂.trans (le_max_right a b₂))⟩
apply ContinuousWithinAt.congr _ this (this _ h₀); clear this
refine continuousWithinAt_const.add ?_
have :
(fun b => ∫ x in b₁..b, f x ∂μ) =ᶠ[𝓝[Icc b₁ b₂] b₀] fun b =>
∫ x in b₁..b₂, indicator {x | x ≤ b} f x ∂μ := by
apply eventuallyEq_of_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin
exact fun b b_in => (integral_indicator b_in).symm
apply ContinuousWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq _ this (integral_indicator h₀).symm
have : IntervalIntegrable (fun x => ‖f x‖) μ b₁ b₂ :=
IntervalIntegrable.norm (h_int' <| right_mem_Icc.mpr h₁₂)
refine continuousWithinAt_of_dominated_interval ?_ ?_ this ?_ <;> clear this
· filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin]
intro x hx
rw [aestronglyMeasurable_indicator_iff, Measure.restrict_restrict, uIoc, Iic_def,
Iic_inter_Ioc_of_le]
· rw [min₁₂]
exact (h_int' hx).1.aestronglyMeasurable
· exact le_max_of_le_right hx.2
exacts [measurableSet_Iic, measurableSet_Iic]
· filter_upwards with x; filter_upwards with t
dsimp [indicator]
split_ifs <;> simp
· have : ∀ᵐ t ∂μ, t < b₀ ∨ b₀ < t := by
filter_upwards [compl_mem_ae_iff.mpr hb₀] with x hx using Ne.lt_or_lt hx
apply this.mono
rintro x₀ (hx₀ | hx₀) -
· have : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[Icc b₁ b₂] b₀, {t : ℝ | t ≤ x}.indicator f x₀ = f x₀ := by
apply mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds
apply Eventually.mono (Ioi_mem_nhds hx₀)
intro x hx
simp [hx.le]
apply continuousWithinAt_const.congr_of_eventuallyEq this
simp [hx₀.le]
· have : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[Icc b₁ b₂] b₀, {t : ℝ | t ≤ x}.indicator f x₀ = 0 := by
apply mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds
apply Eventually.mono (Iio_mem_nhds hx₀)
intro x hx
simp [hx]
apply continuousWithinAt_const.congr_of_eventuallyEq this
simp [hx₀]
· apply continuousWithinAt_of_not_mem_closure
rwa [closure_Icc]
theorem continuousAt_parametric_primitive_of_dominated [FirstCountableTopology X]
{F : X → ℝ → E} (bound : ℝ → ℝ) (a b : ℝ)
{a₀ b₀ : ℝ} {x₀ : X} (hF_meas : ∀ x, AEStronglyMeasurable (F x) (μ.restrict <| Ι a b))
(h_bound : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ᵐ t ∂μ.restrict <| Ι a b, ‖F x t‖ ≤ bound t)
(bound_integrable : IntervalIntegrable bound μ a b)
(h_cont : ∀ᵐ t ∂μ.restrict <| Ι a b, ContinuousAt (fun x ↦ F x t) x₀) (ha₀ : a₀ ∈ Ioo a b)
(hb₀ : b₀ ∈ Ioo a b) (hμb₀ : μ {b₀} = 0) :
ContinuousAt (fun p : X × ℝ ↦ ∫ t : ℝ in a₀..p.2, F p.1 t ∂μ) (x₀, b₀) := by
have hsub : ∀ {a₀ b₀}, a₀ ∈ Ioo a b → b₀ ∈ Ioo a b → Ι a₀ b₀ ⊆ Ι a b := fun ha₀ hb₀ ↦
(ordConnected_Ioo.uIoc_subset ha₀ hb₀).trans (Ioo_subset_Ioc_self.trans Ioc_subset_uIoc)
have Ioo_nhds : Ioo a b ∈ 𝓝 b₀ := Ioo_mem_nhds hb₀.1 hb₀.2
have Icc_nhds : Icc a b ∈ 𝓝 b₀ := Icc_mem_nhds hb₀.1 hb₀.2
have hx₀ : ∀ᵐ t : ℝ ∂μ.restrict (Ι a b), ‖F x₀ t‖ ≤ bound t := h_bound.self_of_nhds
have : ∀ᶠ p : X × ℝ in 𝓝 (x₀, b₀),
∫ s in a₀..p.2, F p.1 s ∂μ =
∫ s in a₀..b₀, F p.1 s ∂μ + ∫ s in b₀..p.2, F x₀ s ∂μ +
∫ s in b₀..p.2, F p.1 s - F x₀ s ∂μ := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
refine (h_bound.prod_mk Ioo_nhds).mono ?_
rintro ⟨x, t⟩ ⟨hx : ∀ᵐ t : ℝ ∂μ.restrict (Ι a b), ‖F x t‖ ≤ bound t, ht : t ∈ Ioo a b⟩
dsimp
have hiF : ∀ {x a₀ b₀},
(∀ᵐ t : ℝ ∂μ.restrict (Ι a b), ‖F x t‖ ≤ bound t) → a₀ ∈ Ioo a b → b₀ ∈ Ioo a b →
IntervalIntegrable (F x) μ a₀ b₀ := fun {x a₀ b₀} hx ha₀ hb₀ ↦
(bound_integrable.mono_set_ae <| Eventually.of_forall <| hsub ha₀ hb₀).mono_fun'
((hF_meas x).mono_set <| hsub ha₀ hb₀)
(ae_restrict_of_ae_restrict_of_subset (hsub ha₀ hb₀) hx)
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_sub, add_assoc, add_sub_cancel,
intervalIntegral.integral_add_adjacent_intervals]
· exact hiF hx ha₀ hb₀
· exact hiF hx hb₀ ht
· exact hiF hx hb₀ ht
· exact hiF hx₀ hb₀ ht
rw [continuousAt_congr this]; clear this
refine (ContinuousAt.add ?_ ?_).add ?_
· exact (intervalIntegral.continuousAt_of_dominated_interval
(Eventually.of_forall fun x ↦ (hF_meas x).mono_set <| hsub ha₀ hb₀)
(h_bound.mono fun x hx ↦
ae_imp_of_ae_restrict <| ae_restrict_of_ae_restrict_of_subset (hsub ha₀ hb₀) hx)
(bound_integrable.mono_set_ae <| Eventually.of_forall <| hsub ha₀ hb₀) <|
ae_imp_of_ae_restrict <| ae_restrict_of_ae_restrict_of_subset (hsub ha₀ hb₀) h_cont).fst'
· refine (?_ : ContinuousAt (fun t ↦ ∫ s in b₀..t, F x₀ s ∂μ) b₀).snd'
apply ContinuousWithinAt.continuousAt _ (Icc_mem_nhds hb₀.1 hb₀.2)
apply intervalIntegral.continuousWithinAt_primitive hμb₀
rw [min_eq_right hb₀.1.le, max_eq_right hb₀.2.le]
exact bound_integrable.mono_fun' (hF_meas x₀) hx₀
· suffices Tendsto (fun x : X × ℝ ↦ ∫ s in b₀..x.2, F x.1 s - F x₀ s ∂μ) (𝓝 (x₀, b₀)) (𝓝 0) by
simpa [ContinuousAt]
have : ∀ᶠ p : X × ℝ in 𝓝 (x₀, b₀),
‖∫ s in b₀..p.2, F p.1 s - F x₀ s ∂μ‖ ≤ |∫ s in b₀..p.2, 2 * bound s ∂μ| := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
refine (h_bound.prod_mk Ioo_nhds).mono ?_
rintro ⟨x, t⟩ ⟨hx : ∀ᵐ t ∂μ.restrict (Ι a b), ‖F x t‖ ≤ bound t, ht : t ∈ Ioo a b⟩
have H : ∀ᵐ t : ℝ ∂μ.restrict (Ι b₀ t), ‖F x t - F x₀ t‖ ≤ 2 * bound t := by
apply (ae_restrict_of_ae_restrict_of_subset (hsub hb₀ ht) (hx.and hx₀)).mono
rintro s ⟨hs₁, hs₂⟩
calc
‖F x s - F x₀ s‖ ≤ ‖F x s‖ + ‖F x₀ s‖ := norm_sub_le _ _
_ ≤ 2 * bound s := by linarith only [hs₁, hs₂]
exact intervalIntegral.norm_integral_le_of_norm_le H
((bound_integrable.mono_set' <| hsub hb₀ ht).const_mul 2)
apply squeeze_zero_norm' this
have : Tendsto (fun t ↦ ∫ s in b₀..t, 2 * bound s ∂μ) (𝓝 b₀) (𝓝 0) := by
suffices ContinuousAt (fun t ↦ ∫ s in b₀..t, 2 * bound s ∂μ) b₀ by
simpa [ContinuousAt] using this
apply ContinuousWithinAt.continuousAt _ Icc_nhds
apply intervalIntegral.continuousWithinAt_primitive hμb₀
apply IntervalIntegrable.const_mul
apply bound_integrable.mono_set'
rw [min_eq_right hb₀.1.le, max_eq_right hb₀.2.le]
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
exact (continuous_abs.tendsto' _ _ abs_zero).comp (this.comp tendsto_snd)
variable [NoAtoms μ]
theorem continuousOn_primitive (h_int : IntegrableOn f (Icc a b) μ) :
ContinuousOn (fun x => ∫ t in Ioc a x, f t ∂μ) (Icc a b) := by
by_cases h : a ≤ b
· have : ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, ∫ t in Ioc a x, f t ∂μ = ∫ t in a..x, f t ∂μ := by
intro x x_in
simp_rw [integral_of_le x_in.1]
rw [continuousOn_congr this]
intro x₀ _
refine continuousWithinAt_primitive (measure_singleton x₀) ?_
simp only [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le, min_eq_left, max_eq_right, h,
min_self]
exact h_int.mono Ioc_subset_Icc_self le_rfl
· rw [Icc_eq_empty h]
exact continuousOn_empty _
theorem continuousOn_primitive_Icc (h_int : IntegrableOn f (Icc a b) μ) :
ContinuousOn (fun x => ∫ t in Icc a x, f t ∂μ) (Icc a b) := by
have aux : (fun x => ∫ t in Icc a x, f t ∂μ) = fun x => ∫ t in Ioc a x, f t ∂μ := by
ext x
exact integral_Icc_eq_integral_Ioc
rw [aux]
exact continuousOn_primitive h_int
/-- Note: this assumes that `f` is `IntervalIntegrable`, in contrast to some other lemmas here. -/
theorem continuousOn_primitive_interval' (h_int : IntervalIntegrable f μ b₁ b₂)
| (ha : a ∈ [[b₁, b₂]]) : ContinuousOn (fun b => ∫ x in a..b, f x ∂μ) [[b₁, b₂]] := fun _ _ ↦ by
refine continuousWithinAt_primitive (measure_singleton _) ?_
rw [min_eq_right ha.1, max_eq_right ha.2]
simpa [intervalIntegrable_iff, uIoc] using h_int
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/DominatedConvergence.lean | 487 | 491 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yakov Pechersky. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Induction
import Mathlib.Data.List.TakeWhile
/-!
# Dropping or taking from lists on the right
Taking or removing element from the tail end of a list
## Main definitions
- `rdrop n`: drop `n : ℕ` elements from the tail
- `rtake n`: take `n : ℕ` elements from the tail
- `rdropWhile p`: remove all the elements from the tail of a list until it finds the first element
for which `p : α → Bool` returns false. This element and everything before is returned.
- `rtakeWhile p`: Returns the longest terminal segment of a list for which `p : α → Bool` returns
true.
## Implementation detail
The two predicate-based methods operate by performing the regular "from-left" operation on
`List.reverse`, followed by another `List.reverse`, so they are not the most performant.
The other two rely on `List.length l` so they still traverse the list twice. One could construct
another function that takes a `L : ℕ` and use `L - n`. Under a proof condition that
`L = l.length`, the function would do the right thing.
-/
-- Make sure we don't import algebra
assert_not_exists Monoid
variable {α : Type*} (p : α → Bool) (l : List α) (n : ℕ)
namespace List
/-- Drop `n` elements from the tail end of a list. -/
def rdrop : List α :=
l.take (l.length - n)
@[simp]
theorem rdrop_nil : rdrop ([] : List α) n = [] := by simp [rdrop]
@[simp]
theorem rdrop_zero : rdrop l 0 = l := by simp [rdrop]
theorem rdrop_eq_reverse_drop_reverse : l.rdrop n = reverse (l.reverse.drop n) := by
rw [rdrop]
induction' l using List.reverseRecOn with xs x IH generalizing n
· simp
· cases n
· simp [take_append]
· simp [take_append_eq_append_take, IH]
@[simp]
theorem rdrop_concat_succ (x : α) : rdrop (l ++ [x]) (n + 1) = rdrop l n := by
simp [rdrop_eq_reverse_drop_reverse]
/-- Take `n` elements from the tail end of a list. -/
def rtake : List α :=
l.drop (l.length - n)
@[simp]
theorem rtake_nil : rtake ([] : List α) n = [] := by simp [rtake]
@[simp]
theorem rtake_zero : rtake l 0 = [] := by simp [rtake]
theorem rtake_eq_reverse_take_reverse : l.rtake n = reverse (l.reverse.take n) := by
rw [rtake]
induction' l using List.reverseRecOn with xs x IH generalizing n
· simp
· cases n
· exact drop_length
· simp [drop_append_eq_append_drop, IH]
@[simp]
theorem rtake_concat_succ (x : α) : rtake (l ++ [x]) (n + 1) = rtake l n ++ [x] := by
simp [rtake_eq_reverse_take_reverse]
/-- Drop elements from the tail end of a list that satisfy `p : α → Bool`.
Implemented naively via `List.reverse` -/
def rdropWhile : List α :=
reverse (l.reverse.dropWhile p)
@[simp]
theorem rdropWhile_nil : rdropWhile p ([] : List α) = [] := by simp [rdropWhile, dropWhile]
theorem rdropWhile_concat (x : α) :
rdropWhile p (l ++ [x]) = if p x then rdropWhile p l else l ++ [x] := by
simp only [rdropWhile, dropWhile, reverse_append, reverse_singleton, singleton_append]
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
@[simp]
theorem rdropWhile_concat_pos (x : α) (h : p x) : rdropWhile p (l ++ [x]) = rdropWhile p l := by
rw [rdropWhile_concat, if_pos h]
@[simp]
theorem rdropWhile_concat_neg (x : α) (h : ¬p x) : rdropWhile p (l ++ [x]) = l ++ [x] := by
rw [rdropWhile_concat, if_neg h]
theorem rdropWhile_singleton (x : α) : rdropWhile p [x] = if p x then [] else [x] := by
rw [← nil_append [x], rdropWhile_concat, rdropWhile_nil]
theorem rdropWhile_last_not (hl : l.rdropWhile p ≠ []) : ¬p ((rdropWhile p l).getLast hl) := by
simp_rw [rdropWhile]
rw [getLast_reverse, head_dropWhile_not p]
simp
theorem rdropWhile_prefix : l.rdropWhile p <+: l := by
rw [← reverse_suffix, rdropWhile, reverse_reverse]
exact dropWhile_suffix _
variable {p} {l}
@[simp]
theorem rdropWhile_eq_nil_iff : rdropWhile p l = [] ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, p x := by simp [rdropWhile]
-- it is in this file because it requires `List.Infix`
@[simp]
theorem dropWhile_eq_self_iff : dropWhile p l = l ↔ ∀ hl : 0 < l.length, ¬p (l.get ⟨0, hl⟩) := by
rcases l with - | ⟨hd, tl⟩
· simp only [dropWhile, true_iff]
intro h
by_contra
rwa [length_nil, lt_self_iff_false] at h
· rw [dropWhile]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· intro _ H
rw [get] at H
refine (cons_ne_self hd tl) (Sublist.antisymm ?_ (sublist_cons_self _ _))
rw [← h]
simp only [H]
exact List.IsSuffix.sublist (dropWhile_suffix p)
· have := h (by simp only [length, Nat.succ_pos])
rw [get] at this
simp_rw [this]
@[simp]
theorem rdropWhile_eq_self_iff : rdropWhile p l = l ↔ ∀ hl : l ≠ [], ¬p (l.getLast hl) := by
simp [rdropWhile, reverse_eq_iff, getLast_eq_getElem, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero]
variable (p) (l)
theorem dropWhile_idempotent : dropWhile p (dropWhile p l) = dropWhile p l := by
simp only [dropWhile_eq_self_iff]
exact fun h => dropWhile_get_zero_not p l h
theorem rdropWhile_idempotent : rdropWhile p (rdropWhile p l) = rdropWhile p l :=
rdropWhile_eq_self_iff.mpr (rdropWhile_last_not _ _)
/-- Take elements from the tail end of a list that satisfy `p : α → Bool`.
Implemented naively via `List.reverse` -/
def rtakeWhile : List α :=
reverse (l.reverse.takeWhile p)
@[simp]
theorem rtakeWhile_nil : rtakeWhile p ([] : List α) = [] := by simp [rtakeWhile, takeWhile]
theorem rtakeWhile_concat (x : α) :
rtakeWhile p (l ++ [x]) = if p x then rtakeWhile p l ++ [x] else [] := by
simp only [rtakeWhile, takeWhile, reverse_append, reverse_singleton, singleton_append]
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
@[simp]
theorem rtakeWhile_concat_pos (x : α) (h : p x) :
rtakeWhile p (l ++ [x]) = rtakeWhile p l ++ [x] := by rw [rtakeWhile_concat, if_pos h]
@[simp]
theorem rtakeWhile_concat_neg (x : α) (h : ¬p x) : rtakeWhile p (l ++ [x]) = [] := by
rw [rtakeWhile_concat, if_neg h]
theorem rtakeWhile_suffix : l.rtakeWhile p <:+ l := by
rw [← reverse_prefix, rtakeWhile, reverse_reverse]
| exact takeWhile_prefix _
variable {p} {l}
| Mathlib/Data/List/DropRight.lean | 179 | 181 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Decomposition.RadonNikodym
/-!
# Exponentially tilted measures
The exponential tilting of a measure `μ` on `α` by a function `f : α → ℝ` is the measure with
density `x ↦ exp (f x) / ∫ y, exp (f y) ∂μ` with respect to `μ`. This is sometimes also called
the Esscher transform.
The definition is mostly used for `f` linear, in which case the exponentially tilted measure belongs
to the natural exponential family of the base measure. Exponentially tilted measures for general `f`
can be used for example to establish variational expressions for the Kullback-Leibler divergence.
## Main definitions
* `Measure.tilted μ f`: exponential tilting of `μ` by `f`, equal to
`μ.withDensity (fun x ↦ ENNReal.ofReal (exp (f x) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ))`.
-/
open Real
open scoped ENNReal NNReal
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f : α → ℝ}
/-- Exponentially tilted measure. When `x ↦ exp (f x)` is integrable, `μ.tilted f` is the
probability measure with density with respect to `μ` proportional to `exp (f x)`. Otherwise it is 0.
-/
noncomputable
def Measure.tilted (μ : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ) : Measure α :=
μ.withDensity (fun x ↦ ENNReal.ofReal (exp (f x) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ))
@[simp]
lemma tilted_of_not_integrable (hf : ¬ Integrable (fun x ↦ exp (f x)) μ) : μ.tilted f = 0 := by
rw [Measure.tilted, integral_undef hf]
simp
@[simp]
lemma tilted_of_not_aemeasurable (hf : ¬ AEMeasurable f μ) : μ.tilted f = 0 := by
refine tilted_of_not_integrable ?_
suffices ¬ AEMeasurable (fun x ↦ exp (f x)) μ by exact fun h ↦ this h.1.aemeasurable
exact fun h ↦ hf (aemeasurable_of_aemeasurable_exp h)
@[simp]
lemma tilted_zero_measure (f : α → ℝ) : (0 : Measure α).tilted f = 0 := by simp [Measure.tilted]
@[simp]
lemma tilted_const' (μ : Measure α) (c : ℝ) :
μ.tilted (fun _ ↦ c) = (μ Set.univ)⁻¹ • μ := by
cases eq_zero_or_neZero μ with
| inl h => rw [h]; simp
| inr h0 =>
simp only [Measure.tilted, withDensity_const, integral_const, smul_eq_mul]
by_cases h_univ : μ Set.univ = ∞
· simp only [measureReal_def, h_univ, ENNReal.toReal_top, zero_mul, div_zero,
ENNReal.ofReal_zero, zero_smul, ENNReal.inv_top]
congr
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_inv, mul_comm, mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel₀ (exp_pos _).ne', mul_one,
measureReal_def, ← ENNReal.toReal_inv, ENNReal.ofReal_toReal]
simp [h0.out]
lemma tilted_const (μ : Measure α) [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (c : ℝ) :
μ.tilted (fun _ ↦ c) = μ := by simp
@[simp]
lemma tilted_zero' (μ : Measure α) : μ.tilted 0 = (μ Set.univ)⁻¹ • μ := by
change μ.tilted (fun _ ↦ 0) = (μ Set.univ)⁻¹ • μ
simp
lemma tilted_zero (μ : Measure α) [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] : μ.tilted 0 = μ := by simp
lemma tilted_congr {g : α → ℝ} (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
μ.tilted f = μ.tilted g := by
have h_int_eq : ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ = ∫ x, exp (g x) ∂μ := by
refine integral_congr_ae ?_
filter_upwards [hfg] with x hx
rw [hx]
refine withDensity_congr_ae ?_
filter_upwards [hfg] with x hx
rw [h_int_eq, hx]
lemma tilted_eq_withDensity_nnreal (μ : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ) :
μ.tilted f = μ.withDensity (fun x ↦ ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞)
(⟨exp (f x) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ, by positivity⟩ : ℝ≥0)) := by
rw [Measure.tilted]
congr with x
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_eq_coe_nnreal]
lemma tilted_apply' (μ : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.tilted f s = ∫⁻ a in s, ENNReal.ofReal (exp (f a) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ) ∂μ := by
rw [Measure.tilted, withDensity_apply _ hs]
lemma tilted_apply (μ : Measure α) [SFinite μ] (f : α → ℝ) (s : Set α) :
μ.tilted f s = ∫⁻ a in s, ENNReal.ofReal (exp (f a) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ) ∂μ := by
rw [Measure.tilted, withDensity_apply' _ s]
| lemma tilted_apply_eq_ofReal_integral' {s : Set α} (f : α → ℝ) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.tilted f s = ENNReal.ofReal (∫ a in s, exp (f a) / ∫ x, exp (f x) ∂μ ∂μ) := by
by_cases hf : Integrable (fun x ↦ exp (f x)) μ
· rw [tilted_apply' _ _ hs, ← ofReal_integral_eq_lintegral_ofReal]
· exact hf.integrableOn.div_const _
· exact ae_of_all _ (fun _ ↦ by positivity)
· simp only [hf, not_false_eq_true, tilted_of_not_integrable, Measure.coe_zero,
Pi.zero_apply, integral_undef hf, div_zero, integral_zero, ENNReal.ofReal_zero]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Tilted.lean | 105 | 112 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.GiryMonad
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Stieltjes
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Order.Lattice
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.StronglyMeasurable.Basic
/-!
# Measurable parametric Stieltjes functions
We provide tools to build a measurable function `α → StieltjesFunction` with limits 0 at -∞ and 1 at
+∞ for all `a : α` from a measurable function `f : α → ℚ → ℝ`. These measurable parametric Stieltjes
functions are cumulative distribution functions (CDF) of transition kernels.
The reason for going through `ℚ` instead of defining directly a Stieltjes function is that since
`ℚ` is countable, building a measurable function is easier and we can obtain properties of the
form `∀ᵐ (a : α) ∂μ, ∀ (q : ℚ), ...` (for some measure `μ` on `α`) by proving the weaker
`∀ (q : ℚ), ∀ᵐ (a : α) ∂μ, ...`.
This construction will be possible if `f a : ℚ → ℝ` satisfies a package of properties for all `a`:
monotonicity, limits at +-∞ and a continuity property. We define `IsRatStieltjesPoint f a` to state
that this is the case at `a` and define the property `IsMeasurableRatCDF f` that `f` is measurable
and `IsRatStieltjesPoint f a` for all `a`.
The function `α → StieltjesFunction` obtained by extending `f` by continuity from the right is then
called `IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunction`.
In applications, we will often only have `IsRatStieltjesPoint f a` almost surely with respect to
some measure. In order to turn that almost everywhere property into an everywhere property we define
`toRatCDF (f : α → ℚ → ℝ) := fun a q ↦ if IsRatStieltjesPoint f a then f a q else defaultRatCDF q`,
which satisfies the property `IsMeasurableRatCDF (toRatCDF f)`.
Finally, we define `stieltjesOfMeasurableRat`, composition of `toRatCDF` and
`IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunction`.
## Main definitions
* `stieltjesOfMeasurableRat`: turn a measurable function `f : α → ℚ → ℝ` into a measurable
function `α → StieltjesFunction`.
-/
open MeasureTheory Set Filter TopologicalSpace
open scoped NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory Topology
/-- A measurable function `α → StieltjesFunction` with limits 0 at -∞ and 1 at +∞ gives a measurable
function `α → Measure ℝ` by taking `StieltjesFunction.measure` at each point. -/
lemma StieltjesFunction.measurable_measure {α : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α}
{f : α → StieltjesFunction} (hf : ∀ q, Measurable fun a ↦ f a q)
(hf_bot : ∀ a, Tendsto (f a) atBot (𝓝 0))
(hf_top : ∀ a, Tendsto (f a) atTop (𝓝 1)) :
Measurable fun a ↦ (f a).measure :=
have : ∀ a, IsProbabilityMeasure (f a).measure :=
fun a ↦ (f a).isProbabilityMeasure (hf_bot a) (hf_top a)
.measure_of_isPiSystem_of_isProbabilityMeasure (borel_eq_generateFrom_Iic ℝ) isPiSystem_Iic <| by
simp_rw [forall_mem_range, StieltjesFunction.measure_Iic (f _) (hf_bot _), sub_zero]
exact fun _ ↦ (hf _).ennreal_ofReal
namespace ProbabilityTheory
variable {α : Type*}
section IsMeasurableRatCDF
variable {f : α → ℚ → ℝ}
/-- `a : α` is a Stieltjes point for `f : α → ℚ → ℝ` if `f a` is monotone with limit 0 at -∞
and 1 at +∞ and satisfies a continuity property. -/
structure IsRatStieltjesPoint (f : α → ℚ → ℝ) (a : α) : Prop where
mono : Monotone (f a)
tendsto_atTop_one : Tendsto (f a) atTop (𝓝 1)
tendsto_atBot_zero : Tendsto (f a) atBot (𝓝 0)
iInf_rat_gt_eq : ∀ t : ℚ, ⨅ r : Ioi t, f a r = f a t
lemma isRatStieltjesPoint_unit_prod_iff (f : α → ℚ → ℝ) (a : α) :
IsRatStieltjesPoint (fun p : Unit × α ↦ f p.2) ((), a)
↔ IsRatStieltjesPoint f a := by
constructor <;>
exact fun h ↦ ⟨h.mono, h.tendsto_atTop_one, h.tendsto_atBot_zero, h.iInf_rat_gt_eq⟩
lemma measurableSet_isRatStieltjesPoint [MeasurableSpace α] (hf : Measurable f) :
MeasurableSet {a | IsRatStieltjesPoint f a} := by
have h1 : MeasurableSet {a | Monotone (f a)} := by
change MeasurableSet {a | ∀ q r (_ : q ≤ r), f a q ≤ f a r}
simp_rw [Set.setOf_forall]
refine MeasurableSet.iInter (fun q ↦ ?_)
refine MeasurableSet.iInter (fun r ↦ ?_)
refine MeasurableSet.iInter (fun _ ↦ ?_)
exact measurableSet_le hf.eval hf.eval
have h2 : MeasurableSet {a | Tendsto (f a) atTop (𝓝 1)} :=
measurableSet_tendsto _ (fun q ↦ hf.eval)
have h3 : MeasurableSet {a | Tendsto (f a) atBot (𝓝 0)} :=
measurableSet_tendsto _ (fun q ↦ hf.eval)
have h4 : MeasurableSet {a | ∀ t : ℚ, ⨅ r : Ioi t, f a r = f a t} := by
rw [Set.setOf_forall]
refine MeasurableSet.iInter (fun q ↦ ?_)
exact measurableSet_eq_fun (.iInf fun _ ↦ hf.eval) hf.eval
suffices {a | IsRatStieltjesPoint f a}
= ({a | Monotone (f a)} ∩ {a | Tendsto (f a) atTop (𝓝 1)} ∩ {a | Tendsto (f a) atBot (𝓝 0)}
∩ {a | ∀ t : ℚ, ⨅ r : Ioi t, f a r = f a t}) by
rw [this]
exact (((h1.inter h2).inter h3).inter h4)
ext a
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, mem_inter_iff]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· exact ⟨⟨⟨h.mono, h.tendsto_atTop_one⟩, h.tendsto_atBot_zero⟩, h.iInf_rat_gt_eq⟩
· exact ⟨h.1.1.1, h.1.1.2, h.1.2, h.2⟩
lemma IsRatStieltjesPoint.ite {f g : α → ℚ → ℝ} {a : α} (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
(hf : p a → IsRatStieltjesPoint f a) (hg : ¬ p a → IsRatStieltjesPoint g a) :
IsRatStieltjesPoint (fun a ↦ if p a then f a else g a) a where
mono := by split_ifs with h; exacts [(hf h).mono, (hg h).mono]
tendsto_atTop_one := by
split_ifs with h; exacts [(hf h).tendsto_atTop_one, (hg h).tendsto_atTop_one]
tendsto_atBot_zero := by
split_ifs with h; exacts [(hf h).tendsto_atBot_zero, (hg h).tendsto_atBot_zero]
iInf_rat_gt_eq := by split_ifs with h; exacts [(hf h).iInf_rat_gt_eq, (hg h).iInf_rat_gt_eq]
variable [MeasurableSpace α]
/-- A function `f : α → ℚ → ℝ` is a (kernel) rational cumulative distribution function if it is
measurable in the first argument and if `f a` satisfies a list of properties for all `a : α`:
monotonicity between 0 at -∞ and 1 at +∞ and a form of continuity.
A function with these properties can be extended to a measurable function `α → StieltjesFunction`.
See `ProbabilityTheory.IsMeasurableRatCDF.stieltjesFunction`.
-/
structure IsMeasurableRatCDF (f : α → ℚ → ℝ) : Prop where
isRatStieltjesPoint : ∀ a, IsRatStieltjesPoint f a
measurable : Measurable f
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.nonneg {f : α → ℚ → ℝ} (hf : IsMeasurableRatCDF f) (a : α) (q : ℚ) :
0 ≤ f a q :=
Monotone.le_of_tendsto (hf.isRatStieltjesPoint a).mono
(hf.isRatStieltjesPoint a).tendsto_atBot_zero q
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.le_one {f : α → ℚ → ℝ} (hf : IsMeasurableRatCDF f) (a : α) (q : ℚ) :
f a q ≤ 1 :=
Monotone.ge_of_tendsto (hf.isRatStieltjesPoint a).mono
(hf.isRatStieltjesPoint a).tendsto_atTop_one q
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.tendsto_atTop_one {f : α → ℚ → ℝ} (hf : IsMeasurableRatCDF f) (a : α) :
Tendsto (f a) atTop (𝓝 1) := (hf.isRatStieltjesPoint a).tendsto_atTop_one
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.tendsto_atBot_zero {f : α → ℚ → ℝ} (hf : IsMeasurableRatCDF f) (a : α) :
Tendsto (f a) atBot (𝓝 0) := (hf.isRatStieltjesPoint a).tendsto_atBot_zero
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF.iInf_rat_gt_eq {f : α → ℚ → ℝ} (hf : IsMeasurableRatCDF f) (a : α)
(q : ℚ) :
⨅ r : Ioi q, f a r = f a q := (hf.isRatStieltjesPoint a).iInf_rat_gt_eq q
end IsMeasurableRatCDF
section DefaultRatCDF
/-- A function with the property `IsMeasurableRatCDF`.
Used in a piecewise construction to convert a function which only satisfies the properties
defining `IsMeasurableRatCDF` on some set into a true `IsMeasurableRatCDF`. -/
def defaultRatCDF (q : ℚ) := if q < 0 then (0 : ℝ) else 1
lemma monotone_defaultRatCDF : Monotone defaultRatCDF := by
unfold defaultRatCDF
intro x y hxy
dsimp only
split_ifs with h_1 h_2 h_2
exacts [le_rfl, zero_le_one, absurd (hxy.trans_lt h_2) h_1, le_rfl]
lemma defaultRatCDF_nonneg (q : ℚ) : 0 ≤ defaultRatCDF q := by
unfold defaultRatCDF
split_ifs
exacts [le_rfl, zero_le_one]
lemma defaultRatCDF_le_one (q : ℚ) : defaultRatCDF q ≤ 1 := by
unfold defaultRatCDF
split_ifs <;> simp
lemma tendsto_defaultRatCDF_atTop : Tendsto defaultRatCDF atTop (𝓝 1) := by
refine (tendsto_congr' ?_).mp tendsto_const_nhds
rw [EventuallyEq, eventually_atTop]
exact ⟨0, fun q hq => (if_neg (not_lt.mpr hq)).symm⟩
lemma tendsto_defaultRatCDF_atBot : Tendsto defaultRatCDF atBot (𝓝 0) := by
refine (tendsto_congr' ?_).mp tendsto_const_nhds
rw [EventuallyEq, eventually_atBot]
refine ⟨-1, fun q hq => (if_pos (hq.trans_lt ?_)).symm⟩
linarith
lemma iInf_rat_gt_defaultRatCDF (t : ℚ) :
⨅ r : Ioi t, defaultRatCDF r = defaultRatCDF t := by
simp only [defaultRatCDF]
have h_bdd : BddBelow (range fun r : ↥(Ioi t) ↦ ite ((r : ℚ) < 0) (0 : ℝ) 1) := by
refine ⟨0, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := mem_range.mpr hx
dsimp only
split_ifs
exacts [le_rfl, zero_le_one]
split_ifs with h
· refine le_antisymm ?_ (le_ciInf fun x ↦ ?_)
· obtain ⟨q, htq, hq_neg⟩ : ∃ q, t < q ∧ q < 0 := ⟨t / 2, by linarith, by linarith⟩
refine (ciInf_le h_bdd ⟨q, htq⟩).trans ?_
rw [if_pos]
rwa [Subtype.coe_mk]
· split_ifs
exacts [le_rfl, zero_le_one]
· refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· refine (ciInf_le h_bdd ⟨t + 1, lt_add_one t⟩).trans ?_
split_ifs
exacts [zero_le_one, le_rfl]
· refine le_ciInf fun x ↦ ?_
rw [if_neg]
rw [not_lt] at h ⊢
exact h.trans (mem_Ioi.mp x.prop).le
lemma isRatStieltjesPoint_defaultRatCDF (a : α) :
IsRatStieltjesPoint (fun (_ : α) ↦ defaultRatCDF) a where
mono := monotone_defaultRatCDF
tendsto_atTop_one := tendsto_defaultRatCDF_atTop
tendsto_atBot_zero := tendsto_defaultRatCDF_atBot
iInf_rat_gt_eq := iInf_rat_gt_defaultRatCDF
lemma IsMeasurableRatCDF_defaultRatCDF (α : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] :
IsMeasurableRatCDF (fun (_ : α) (q : ℚ) ↦ defaultRatCDF q) where
isRatStieltjesPoint := isRatStieltjesPoint_defaultRatCDF
measurable := measurable_const
end DefaultRatCDF
section ToRatCDF
variable {f : α → ℚ → ℝ}
open scoped Classical in
/-- Turn a function `f : α → ℚ → ℝ` into another with the property `IsRatStieltjesPoint f a`
everywhere. At `a` that does not satisfy that property, `f a` is replaced by an arbitrary suitable
function.
Mainly useful when `f` satisfies the property `IsRatStieltjesPoint f a` almost everywhere with
respect to some measure. -/
noncomputable
def toRatCDF (f : α → ℚ → ℝ) : α → ℚ → ℝ := fun a ↦
if IsRatStieltjesPoint f a then f a else defaultRatCDF
lemma toRatCDF_of_isRatStieltjesPoint {a : α} (h : IsRatStieltjesPoint f a) (q : ℚ) :
toRatCDF f a q = f a q := by
rw [toRatCDF, if_pos h]
|
lemma toRatCDF_unit_prod (a : α) :
toRatCDF (fun (p : Unit × α) ↦ f p.2) ((), a) = toRatCDF f a := by
unfold toRatCDF
| Mathlib/Probability/Kernel/Disintegration/MeasurableStieltjes.lean | 247 | 250 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.MFDeriv.Defs
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.ContMDiff.Defs
/-!
# Basic properties of the manifold Fréchet derivative
In this file, we show various properties of the manifold Fréchet derivative,
mimicking the API for Fréchet derivatives.
- basic properties of unique differentiability sets
- various general lemmas about the manifold Fréchet derivative
- deducing differentiability from smoothness,
- deriving continuity from differentiability on manifolds,
- congruence lemmas for derivatives on manifolds
- composition lemmas and the chain rule
-/
noncomputable section
assert_not_exists tangentBundleCore
open scoped Topology Manifold
open Set Bundle ChartedSpace
section DerivativesProperties
/-! ### Unique differentiability sets in manifolds -/
variable
{𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
{H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H)
{M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
{E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E']
{H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H'] {I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'}
{M' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M'] [ChartedSpace H' M']
{E'' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E''] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'']
{H'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H''] {I'' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E'' H''}
{M'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M''] [ChartedSpace H'' M'']
{f f₁ : M → M'} {x : M} {s t : Set M} {g : M' → M''} {u : Set M'}
theorem uniqueMDiffWithinAt_univ : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I univ x := by
unfold UniqueMDiffWithinAt
simp only [preimage_univ, univ_inter]
exact I.uniqueDiffOn _ (mem_range_self _)
variable {I}
theorem uniqueMDiffWithinAt_iff_inter_range {s : Set M} {x : M} :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x ↔
UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I)
((extChartAt I x) x) := Iff.rfl
theorem uniqueMDiffWithinAt_iff {s : Set M} {x : M} :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x ↔
UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ (extChartAt I x).target)
((extChartAt I x) x) := by
apply uniqueDiffWithinAt_congr
rw [nhdsWithin_inter, nhdsWithin_inter, nhdsWithin_extChartAt_target_eq]
nonrec theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono_nhds {s t : Set M} {x : M} (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x)
(ht : 𝓝[s] x ≤ 𝓝[t] x) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I t x :=
hs.mono_nhds <| by simpa only [← map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin] using Filter.map_mono ht
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin {s t : Set M} {x : M}
(hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I t x :=
hs.mono_nhds (nhdsWithin_le_iff.2 ht)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")]
alias UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono_of_mem := UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono (h : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (st : s ⊆ t) :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I t x :=
UniqueDiffWithinAt.mono h <| inter_subset_inter (preimage_mono st) (Subset.refl _)
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.inter' (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I (s ∩ t) x :=
hs.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin (Filter.inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin ht)
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.inter (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I (s ∩ t) x :=
hs.inter' (nhdsWithin_le_nhds ht)
theorem IsOpen.uniqueMDiffWithinAt (hs : IsOpen s) (xs : x ∈ s) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x :=
(uniqueMDiffWithinAt_univ I).mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin <| nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| hs.mem_nhds xs
theorem UniqueMDiffOn.inter (hs : UniqueMDiffOn I s) (ht : IsOpen t) : UniqueMDiffOn I (s ∩ t) :=
fun _x hx => UniqueMDiffWithinAt.inter (hs _ hx.1) (ht.mem_nhds hx.2)
theorem IsOpen.uniqueMDiffOn (hs : IsOpen s) : UniqueMDiffOn I s :=
fun _x hx => hs.uniqueMDiffWithinAt hx
theorem uniqueMDiffOn_univ : UniqueMDiffOn I (univ : Set M) :=
isOpen_univ.uniqueMDiffOn
nonrec theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.prod {x : M} {y : M'} {s t} (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x)
(ht : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I' t y) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt (I.prod I') (s ×ˢ t) (x, y) := by
refine (hs.prod ht).mono ?_
rw [ModelWithCorners.range_prod, ← prod_inter_prod]
rfl
theorem UniqueMDiffOn.prod {s : Set M} {t : Set M'} (hs : UniqueMDiffOn I s)
(ht : UniqueMDiffOn I' t) : UniqueMDiffOn (I.prod I') (s ×ˢ t) := fun x h ↦
(hs x.1 h.1).prod (ht x.2 h.2)
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.mono (hst : s ⊆ t) (h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f t x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x :=
⟨ContinuousWithinAt.mono h.1 hst, DifferentiableWithinAt.mono
h.differentiableWithinAt_writtenInExtChartAt
(inter_subset_inter_left _ (preimage_mono hst))⟩
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f univ x ↔ MDifferentiableAt I I' f x := by
simp_rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, MDifferentiableAt, ChartedSpace.LiftPropAt]
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f (s ∩ t) x ↔ MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x := by
rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, MDifferentiableWithinAt,
differentiableWithinAt_localInvariantProp.liftPropWithinAt_inter ht]
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter' (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f (s ∩ t) x ↔ MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x := by
rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, MDifferentiableWithinAt,
differentiableWithinAt_localInvariantProp.liftPropWithinAt_inter' ht]
theorem MDifferentiableAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt (h : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x :=
MDifferentiableWithinAt.mono (subset_univ _) (mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ.2 h)
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.mdifferentiableAt (h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x)
(hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x := by
have : s = univ ∩ s := by rw [univ_inter]
rwa [this, mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter hs, mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ] at h
theorem MDifferentiableOn.mono (h : MDifferentiableOn I I' f t) (st : s ⊆ t) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s := fun x hx => (h x (st hx)).mono st
theorem mdifferentiableOn_univ : MDifferentiableOn I I' f univ ↔ MDifferentiable I I' f := by
simp only [MDifferentiableOn, mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ, mfld_simps]; rfl
theorem MDifferentiableOn.mdifferentiableAt (h : MDifferentiableOn I I' f s) (hx : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x :=
(h x (mem_of_mem_nhds hx)).mdifferentiableAt hx
theorem MDifferentiable.mdifferentiableOn (h : MDifferentiable I I' f) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s :=
(mdifferentiableOn_univ.2 h).mono (subset_univ _)
theorem mdifferentiableOn_of_locally_mdifferentiableOn
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ x ∈ u ∧ MDifferentiableOn I I' f (s ∩ u)) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s := by
intro x xs
rcases h x xs with ⟨t, t_open, xt, ht⟩
exact (mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter (t_open.mem_nhds xt)).1 (ht x ⟨xs, xt⟩)
theorem MDifferentiable.mdifferentiableAt (hf : MDifferentiable I I' f) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x :=
hf x
/-!
### Relating differentiability in a manifold and differentiability in the model space
through extended charts
-/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_target_inter {f : M → M'} {s : Set M} {x : M} :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (writtenInExtChartAt I I' x f)
((extChartAt I x).target ∩ (extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s) ((extChartAt I x) x) := by
rw [mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff']
refine and_congr Iff.rfl (exists_congr fun f' => ?_)
rw [inter_comm]
simp only [HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_inter, nhdsWithin_extChartAt_target_eq]
/-- One can reformulate smoothness within a set at a point as continuity within this set at this
point, and smoothness in the corresponding extended chart. -/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (extChartAt I x x) := by
simp_rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, ChartedSpace.liftPropWithinAt_iff']; rfl
/-- One can reformulate smoothness within a set at a point as continuity within this set at this
point, and smoothness in the corresponding extended chart. This form states smoothness of `f`
written in such a way that the set is restricted to lie within the domain/codomain of the
corresponding charts.
Even though this expression is more complicated than the one in `mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff`, it is
a smaller set, but their germs at `extChartAt I x x` are equal. It is sometimes useful to rewrite
using this in the goal.
-/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_target_inter' :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).target ∩
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' (f x)).source))
(extChartAt I x x) := by
simp only [MDifferentiableWithinAt, liftPropWithinAt_iff']
exact and_congr_right fun hc => differentiableWithinAt_congr_nhds <|
hc.nhdsWithin_extChartAt_symm_preimage_inter_range
/-- One can reformulate smoothness within a set at a point as continuity within this set at this
point, and smoothness in the corresponding extended chart in the target. -/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_target :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
MDifferentiableWithinAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f) s x := by
simp_rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, liftPropWithinAt_iff', ← and_assoc]
have cont :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧ ContinuousWithinAt (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f) s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
and_iff_left_of_imp <| (continuousAt_extChartAt _).comp_continuousWithinAt
simp_rw [cont, DifferentiableWithinAtProp, extChartAt, PartialHomeomorph.extend,
PartialEquiv.coe_trans,
ModelWithCorners.toPartialEquiv_coe, PartialHomeomorph.coe_coe, modelWithCornersSelf_coe,
chartAt_self_eq, PartialHomeomorph.refl_apply]
rfl
theorem mdifferentiableAt_iff_target {x : M} :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x ↔
ContinuousAt f x ∧ MDifferentiableAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f) x := by
rw [← mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ, ← mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ,
mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_target, continuousWithinAt_univ]
section IsManifold
variable {e : PartialHomeomorph M H} {e' : PartialHomeomorph M' H'}
open IsManifold
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_source_of_mem_maximalAtlas
[IsManifold I 1 M] (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I 1 M) (hx : x ∈ e.source) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
MDifferentiableWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) I' (f ∘ (e.extend I).symm) ((e.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I)
(e.extend I x) := by
have h2x := hx; rw [← e.extend_source (I := I)] at h2x
simp_rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt,
differentiableWithinAt_localInvariantProp.liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart_source he hx,
StructureGroupoid.liftPropWithinAt_self_source,
e.extend_symm_continuousWithinAt_comp_right_iff, differentiableWithinAtProp_self_source,
DifferentiableWithinAtProp, Function.comp, e.left_inv hx, (e.extend I).left_inv h2x]
rfl
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_source_of_mem_source
[IsManifold I 1 M] {x' : M} (hx' : x' ∈ (chartAt H x).source) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x' ↔
MDifferentiableWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) I' (f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (extChartAt I x x') :=
mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_source_of_mem_maximalAtlas (chart_mem_maximalAtlas x) hx'
theorem mdifferentiableAt_iff_source_of_mem_source
[IsManifold I 1 M] {x' : M} (hx' : x' ∈ (chartAt H x).source) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x' ↔
MDifferentiableWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) I' (f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm) (range I)
(extChartAt I x x') := by
simp_rw [← mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ, mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_source_of_mem_source hx',
preimage_univ, univ_inter]
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_target_of_mem_source
[IsManifold I' 1 M'] {x : M} {y : M'} (hy : f x ∈ (chartAt H' y).source) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧ MDifferentiableWithinAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') (extChartAt I' y ∘ f) s x := by
simp_rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt]
rw [differentiableWithinAt_localInvariantProp.liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart_target
(chart_mem_maximalAtlas y) hy,
and_congr_right]
intro hf
simp_rw [StructureGroupoid.liftPropWithinAt_self_target]
simp_rw [((chartAt H' y).continuousAt hy).comp_continuousWithinAt hf]
rw [← extChartAt_source I'] at hy
simp_rw [(continuousAt_extChartAt' hy).comp_continuousWithinAt hf]
rfl
theorem mdifferentiableAt_iff_target_of_mem_source
[IsManifold I' 1 M'] {x : M} {y : M'} (hy : f x ∈ (chartAt H' y).source) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x ↔
ContinuousAt f x ∧ MDifferentiableAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') (extChartAt I' y ∘ f) x := by
rw [← mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ, mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_target_of_mem_source hy,
continuousWithinAt_univ, ← mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ]
variable [IsManifold I 1 M] [IsManifold I' 1 M']
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas {x : M} (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I 1 M)
(he' : e' ∈ maximalAtlas I' 1 M') (hx : x ∈ e.source) (hy : f x ∈ e'.source) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (e'.extend I' ∘ f ∘ (e.extend I).symm)
((e.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (e.extend I x) :=
differentiableWithinAt_localInvariantProp.liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart he hx he' hy
/-- An alternative formulation of `mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas`
if the set if `s` lies in `e.source`. -/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_image {x : M} (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I 1 M)
(he' : e' ∈ maximalAtlas I' 1 M') (hs : s ⊆ e.source) (hx : x ∈ e.source)
(hy : f x ∈ e'.source) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (e'.extend I' ∘ f ∘ (e.extend I).symm) (e.extend I '' s)
(e.extend I x) := by
rw [mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas he he' hx hy, and_congr_right_iff]
refine fun _ => differentiableWithinAt_congr_nhds ?_
simp_rw [nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq, e.extend_symm_preimage_inter_range_eventuallyEq hs hx]
/-- One can reformulate smoothness within a set at a point as continuity within this set at this
point, and smoothness in any chart containing that point. -/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_source {x' : M} {y : M'} (hx : x' ∈ (chartAt H x).source)
(hy : f x' ∈ (chartAt H' y).source) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x' ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x' ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (extChartAt I x x') :=
mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas (chart_mem_maximalAtlas x)
(chart_mem_maximalAtlas y) hx hy
/-- One can reformulate smoothness within a set at a point as continuity within this set at this
point, and smoothness in any chart containing that point. Version requiring differentiability
in the target instead of `range I`. -/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_source' {x' : M} {y : M'}
(hx : x' ∈ (chartAt H x).source) (hy : f x' ∈ (chartAt H' y).source) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x' ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x' ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).target ∩ (extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' y).source))
(extChartAt I x x') := by
refine (mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_source hx hy).trans ?_
rw [← extChartAt_source I] at hx
rw [← extChartAt_source I'] at hy
rw [and_congr_right_iff]
set e := extChartAt I x; set e' := extChartAt I' (f x)
refine fun hc => differentiableWithinAt_congr_nhds ?_
rw [← e.image_source_inter_eq', ← map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin_eq_image' hx,
← map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin' hx, inter_comm, nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem]
exact hc (extChartAt_source_mem_nhds' hy)
theorem mdifferentiableAt_iff_of_mem_source {x' : M} {y : M'} (hx : x' ∈ (chartAt H x).source)
(hy : f x' ∈ (chartAt H' y).source) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x' ↔
ContinuousAt f x' ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm) (range I)
(extChartAt I x x') :=
(mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_source hx hy).trans <| by
rw [continuousWithinAt_univ, preimage_univ, univ_inter]
theorem mdifferentiableOn_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I 1 M)
(he' : e' ∈ maximalAtlas I' 1 M') (hs : s ⊆ e.source) (h2s : MapsTo f s e'.source) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s ↔
ContinuousOn f s ∧
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (e'.extend I' ∘ f ∘ (e.extend I).symm) (e.extend I '' s) := by
simp_rw [ContinuousOn, DifferentiableOn, Set.forall_mem_image, ← forall_and, MDifferentiableOn]
exact forall₂_congr fun x hx => mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_image he he' hs (hs hx) (h2s hx)
/-- Differentiability on a set is equivalent to differentiability in the extended charts. -/
theorem mdifferentiableOn_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas' (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I 1 M)
(he' : e' ∈ maximalAtlas I' 1 M') (hs : s ⊆ e.source) (h2s : MapsTo f s e'.source) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s ↔
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (e'.extend I' ∘ f ∘ (e.extend I).symm) (e.extend I '' s) :=
(mdifferentiableOn_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas he he' hs h2s).trans <| and_iff_right_of_imp fun h ↦
(e.continuousOn_writtenInExtend_iff hs h2s).1 h.continuousOn
/-- If the set where you want `f` to be smooth lies entirely in a single chart, and `f` maps it
into a single chart, the smoothness of `f` on that set can be expressed by purely looking in
these charts.
Note: this lemma uses `extChartAt I x '' s` instead of `(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s` to ensure
that this set lies in `(extChartAt I x).target`. -/
theorem mdifferentiableOn_iff_of_subset_source {x : M} {y : M'} (hs : s ⊆ (chartAt H x).source)
(h2s : MapsTo f s (chartAt H' y).source) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s ↔
ContinuousOn f s ∧
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm) (extChartAt I x '' s) :=
mdifferentiableOn_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas (chart_mem_maximalAtlas x)
(chart_mem_maximalAtlas y) hs h2s
/-- If the set where you want `f` to be smooth lies entirely in a single chart, and `f` maps it
into a single chart, the smoothness of `f` on that set can be expressed by purely looking in
these charts.
Note: this lemma uses `extChartAt I x '' s` instead of `(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s` to ensure
that this set lies in `(extChartAt I x).target`. -/
theorem mdifferentiableOn_iff_of_subset_source' {x : M} {y : M'} (hs : s ⊆ (extChartAt I x).source)
(h2s : MapsTo f s (extChartAt I' y).source) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s ↔
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm) (extChartAt I x '' s) := by
rw [extChartAt_source] at hs h2s
exact mdifferentiableOn_iff_of_mem_maximalAtlas' (chart_mem_maximalAtlas x)
(chart_mem_maximalAtlas y) hs h2s
/-- One can reformulate smoothness on a set as continuity on this set, and smoothness in any
extended chart. -/
theorem mdifferentiableOn_iff :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s ↔
ContinuousOn f s ∧
∀ (x : M) (y : M'),
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).target ∩
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' y).source)) := by
constructor
· intro h
refine ⟨fun x hx => (h x hx).1, fun x y z hz => ?_⟩
simp only [mfld_simps] at hz
let w := (extChartAt I x).symm z
have : w ∈ s := by simp only [w, hz, mfld_simps]
specialize h w this
have w1 : w ∈ (chartAt H x).source := by simp only [w, hz, mfld_simps]
have w2 : f w ∈ (chartAt H' y).source := by simp only [w, hz, mfld_simps]
convert ((mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_source w1 w2).mp h).2.mono _
· simp only [w, hz, mfld_simps]
· mfld_set_tac
· rintro ⟨hcont, hdiff⟩ x hx
refine differentiableWithinAt_localInvariantProp.liftPropWithinAt_iff.mpr ?_
refine ⟨hcont x hx, ?_⟩
dsimp [DifferentiableWithinAtProp]
convert hdiff x (f x) (extChartAt I x x) (by simp only [hx, mfld_simps]) using 1
mfld_set_tac
/-- One can reformulate smoothness on a set as continuity on this set, and smoothness in any
extended chart in the target. -/
theorem mdifferentiableOn_iff_target :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s ↔
ContinuousOn f s ∧
∀ y : M', MDifferentiableOn I 𝓘(𝕜, E') (extChartAt I' y ∘ f)
(s ∩ f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' y).source) := by
simp only [mdifferentiableOn_iff, ModelWithCorners.source_eq, chartAt_self_eq,
PartialHomeomorph.refl_partialEquiv, PartialEquiv.refl_trans, extChartAt,
PartialHomeomorph.extend, Set.preimage_univ, Set.inter_univ, and_congr_right_iff]
intro h
constructor
· refine fun h' y => ⟨?_, fun x _ => h' x y⟩
have h'' : ContinuousOn _ univ := (ModelWithCorners.continuous I').continuousOn
convert (h''.comp_inter (chartAt H' y).continuousOn_toFun).comp_inter h
simp
· exact fun h' x y => (h' y).2 x 0
/-- One can reformulate smoothness as continuity and smoothness in any extended chart. -/
theorem mdifferentiable_iff :
MDifferentiable I I' f ↔
Continuous f ∧
∀ (x : M) (y : M'),
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).target ∩
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' (f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' y).source)) := by
simp [← mdifferentiableOn_univ, mdifferentiableOn_iff, continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ]
/-- One can reformulate smoothness as continuity and smoothness in any extended chart in the
target. -/
theorem mdifferentiable_iff_target :
MDifferentiable I I' f ↔
Continuous f ∧ ∀ y : M',
MDifferentiableOn I 𝓘(𝕜, E') (extChartAt I' y ∘ f) (f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' y).source) := by
rw [← mdifferentiableOn_univ, mdifferentiableOn_iff_target]
simp [continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ]
end IsManifold
/-! ### Deducing differentiability from smoothness -/
variable {n : WithTop ℕ∞}
theorem ContMDiffWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt (hf : ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x)
(hn : 1 ≤ n) : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x := by
suffices h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f (s ∩ f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' (f x)).source) x by
rwa [mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter'] at h
apply hf.1.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin
exact extChartAt_source_mem_nhds (f x)
rw [mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff]
exact ⟨hf.1.mono inter_subset_left, (hf.2.differentiableWithinAt (mod_cast hn)).mono
(by mfld_set_tac)⟩
theorem ContMDiffAt.mdifferentiableAt (hf : ContMDiffAt I I' n f x) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x :=
mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ.1 <| ContMDiffWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt hf hn
theorem ContMDiff.mdifferentiableAt (hf : ContMDiff I I' n f) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x :=
hf.contMDiffAt.mdifferentiableAt hn
theorem ContMDiff.mdifferentiableWithinAt (hf : ContMDiff I I' n f) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x :=
(hf.contMDiffAt.mdifferentiableAt hn).mdifferentiableWithinAt
theorem ContMDiffOn.mdifferentiableOn (hf : ContMDiffOn I I' n f s) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).mdifferentiableWithinAt hn
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")]
alias SmoothWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt := ContMDiffWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt
theorem ContMDiff.mdifferentiable (hf : ContMDiff I I' n f) (hn : 1 ≤ n) : MDifferentiable I I' f :=
fun x => (hf x).mdifferentiableAt hn
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")]
alias SmoothAt.mdifferentiableAt := ContMDiffAt.mdifferentiableAt
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")]
alias SmoothOn.mdifferentiableOn := ContMDiffOn.mdifferentiableOn
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")]
alias Smooth.mdifferentiable := ContMDiff.mdifferentiable
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")]
alias Smooth.mdifferentiableAt := ContMDiff.mdifferentiableAt
theorem MDifferentiableOn.continuousOn (h : MDifferentiableOn I I' f s) : ContinuousOn f s :=
fun x hx => (h x hx).continuousWithinAt
theorem MDifferentiable.continuous (h : MDifferentiable I I' f) : Continuous f :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun x => (h x).continuousAt
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-20")]
alias Smooth.mdifferentiableWithinAt := ContMDiff.mdifferentiableWithinAt
/-! ### Deriving continuity from differentiability on manifolds -/
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.prodMk {f : M → M'} {g : M → M''}
(hf : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x) (hg : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I'' g s x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I (I'.prod I'') (fun x => (f x, g x)) s x :=
⟨hf.1.prodMk hg.1, hf.2.prodMk hg.2⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-08")]
alias MDifferentiableWithinAt.prod_mk := MDifferentiableWithinAt.prodMk
theorem MDifferentiableAt.prodMk {f : M → M'} {g : M → M''} (hf : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x)
(hg : MDifferentiableAt I I'' g x) :
MDifferentiableAt I (I'.prod I'') (fun x => (f x, g x)) x :=
⟨hf.1.prodMk hg.1, hf.2.prodMk hg.2⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-08")]
alias MDifferentiableAt.prod_mk := MDifferentiableAt.prodMk
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.prodMk_space {f : M → E'} {g : M → E''}
(hf : MDifferentiableWithinAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') f s x)
(hg : MDifferentiableWithinAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E'') g s x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E' × E'') (fun x => (f x, g x)) s x :=
⟨hf.1.prodMk hg.1, hf.2.prodMk hg.2⟩
| @[deprecated (since := "2025-03-08")]
alias MDifferentiableWithinAt.prod_mk_space := MDifferentiableWithinAt.prodMk_space
theorem MDifferentiableAt.prodMk_space {f : M → E'} {g : M → E''}
(hf : MDifferentiableAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') f x) (hg : MDifferentiableAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E'') g x) :
MDifferentiableAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E' × E'') (fun x => (f x, g x)) x :=
⟨hf.1.prodMk hg.1, hf.2.prodMk hg.2⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-08")]
alias MDifferentiableAt.prod_mk_space := MDifferentiableAt.prodMk_space
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/MFDeriv/Basic.lean | 540 | 550 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Cyclotomic.Roots
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.NumberField.Basic
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Galois.Basic
/-!
# Cyclotomic extensions
Let `A` and `B` be commutative rings with `Algebra A B`. For `S : Set ℕ+`, we define a class
`IsCyclotomicExtension S A B` expressing the fact that `B` is obtained from `A` by adding `n`-th
primitive roots of unity, for all `n ∈ S`.
## Main definitions
* `IsCyclotomicExtension S A B` : means that `B` is obtained from `A` by adding `n`-th primitive
roots of unity, for all `n ∈ S`.
* `CyclotomicField`: given `n : ℕ+` and a field `K`, we define `CyclotomicField n K` as the
splitting field of `cyclotomic n K`. If `n` is nonzero in `K`, it has the instance
`IsCyclotomicExtension {n} K (CyclotomicField n K)`.
* `CyclotomicRing` : if `A` is a domain with fraction field `K` and `n : ℕ+`, we define
`CyclotomicRing n A K` as the `A`-subalgebra of `CyclotomicField n K` generated by the roots of
`X ^ n - 1`. If `n` is nonzero in `A`, it has the instance
`IsCyclotomicExtension {n} A (CyclotomicRing n A K)`.
## Main results
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.trans` : if `IsCyclotomicExtension S A B` and
`IsCyclotomicExtension T B C`, then `IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ T) A C` if
`Function.Injective (algebraMap B C)`.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.union_right` : given `IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ T) A B`, then
`IsCyclotomicExtension T (adjoin A { b : B | ∃ a : ℕ+, a ∈ S ∧ b ^ (a : ℕ) = 1 }) B`.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.union_left` : given `IsCyclotomicExtension T A B` and `S ⊆ T`, then
`IsCyclotomicExtension S A (adjoin A { b : B | ∃ a : ℕ+, a ∈ S ∧ b ^ (a : ℕ) = 1 })`.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.finite` : if `S` is finite and `IsCyclotomicExtension S A B`, then
`B` is a finite `A`-algebra.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.numberField` : a finite cyclotomic extension of a number field is a
number field.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.isSplittingField_X_pow_sub_one` : if `IsCyclotomicExtension {n} K L`,
then `L` is the splitting field of `X ^ n - 1`.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.splitting_field_cyclotomic` : if `IsCyclotomicExtension {n} K L`,
then `L` is the splitting field of `cyclotomic n K`.
## Implementation details
Our definition of `IsCyclotomicExtension` is very general, to allow rings of any characteristic
and infinite extensions, but it will mainly be used in the case `S = {n}` and for integral domains.
All results are in the `IsCyclotomicExtension` namespace.
Note that some results, for example `IsCyclotomicExtension.trans`,
`IsCyclotomicExtension.finite`, `IsCyclotomicExtension.numberField`,
`IsCyclotomicExtension.finiteDimensional`, `IsCyclotomicExtension.isGalois` and
`CyclotomicField.algebraBase` are lemmas, but they can be made local instances. Some of them are
included in the `Cyclotomic` locale.
-/
open Polynomial Algebra Module Set
universe u v w z
variable (n : ℕ+) (S T : Set ℕ+) (A : Type u) (B : Type v) (K : Type w) (L : Type z)
variable [CommRing A] [CommRing B] [Algebra A B]
variable [Field K] [Field L] [Algebra K L]
noncomputable section
/-- Given an `A`-algebra `B` and `S : Set ℕ+`, we define `IsCyclotomicExtension S A B` requiring
that there is an `n`-th primitive root of unity in `B` for all `n ∈ S` and that `B` is generated
over `A` by the roots of `X ^ n - 1`. -/
@[mk_iff]
class IsCyclotomicExtension : Prop where
/-- For all `n ∈ S`, there exists a primitive `n`-th root of unity in `B`. -/
exists_prim_root {n : ℕ+} (ha : n ∈ S) : ∃ r : B, IsPrimitiveRoot r n
/-- The `n`-th roots of unity, for `n ∈ S`, generate `B` as an `A`-algebra. -/
adjoin_roots : ∀ x : B, x ∈ adjoin A {b : B | ∃ n : ℕ+, n ∈ S ∧ b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1}
namespace IsCyclotomicExtension
section Basic
/-- A reformulation of `IsCyclotomicExtension` that uses `⊤`. -/
theorem iff_adjoin_eq_top :
IsCyclotomicExtension S A B ↔
(∀ n : ℕ+, n ∈ S → ∃ r : B, IsPrimitiveRoot r n) ∧
adjoin A {b : B | ∃ n : ℕ+, n ∈ S ∧ b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1} = ⊤ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun _ => h.exists_prim_root, Algebra.eq_top_iff.2 h.adjoin_roots⟩, fun h =>
⟨h.1 _, Algebra.eq_top_iff.1 h.2⟩⟩
/-- A reformulation of `IsCyclotomicExtension` in the case `S` is a singleton. -/
theorem iff_singleton :
IsCyclotomicExtension {n} A B ↔
(∃ r : B, IsPrimitiveRoot r n) ∧ ∀ x, x ∈ adjoin A {b : B | b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1} := by
simp [isCyclotomicExtension_iff]
/-- If `IsCyclotomicExtension ∅ A B`, then the image of `A` in `B` equals `B`. -/
theorem empty [h : IsCyclotomicExtension ∅ A B] : (⊥ : Subalgebra A B) = ⊤ := by
simpa [Algebra.eq_top_iff, isCyclotomicExtension_iff] using h
/-- If `IsCyclotomicExtension {1} A B`, then the image of `A` in `B` equals `B`. -/
theorem singleton_one [h : IsCyclotomicExtension {1} A B] : (⊥ : Subalgebra A B) = ⊤ :=
Algebra.eq_top_iff.2 fun x => by
simpa [adjoin_singleton_one] using ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 h).2 x
variable {A B}
/-- If `(⊥ : SubAlgebra A B) = ⊤`, then `IsCyclotomicExtension ∅ A B`. -/
theorem singleton_zero_of_bot_eq_top (h : (⊥ : Subalgebra A B) = ⊤) :
IsCyclotomicExtension ∅ A B := by
refine (iff_adjoin_eq_top _ _ _).2
⟨fun s hs => by simp at hs, _root_.eq_top_iff.2 fun x hx => ?_⟩
rw [← h] at hx
simpa using hx
variable (A B)
/-- Transitivity of cyclotomic extensions. -/
theorem trans (C : Type w) [CommRing C] [Algebra A C] [Algebra B C] [IsScalarTower A B C]
[hS : IsCyclotomicExtension S A B] [hT : IsCyclotomicExtension T B C]
(h : Function.Injective (algebraMap B C)) : IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ T) A C := by
refine ⟨fun hn => ?_, fun x => ?_⟩
· rcases hn with hn | hn
· obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 hS).1 hn
refine ⟨algebraMap B C b, ?_⟩
exact hb.map_of_injective h
· exact ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 hT).1 hn
· refine adjoin_induction (hx := ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff T B _).1 hT).2 x)
(fun c ⟨n, hn⟩ => subset_adjoin ⟨n, Or.inr hn.1, hn.2⟩) (fun b => ?_)
(fun x y _ _ hx hy => Subalgebra.add_mem _ hx hy)
fun x y _ _ hx hy => Subalgebra.mul_mem _ hx hy
let f := IsScalarTower.toAlgHom A B C
have hb : f b ∈ (adjoin A {b : B | ∃ a : ℕ+, a ∈ S ∧ b ^ (a : ℕ) = 1}).map f :=
⟨b, ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 hS).2 b, rfl⟩
rw [IsScalarTower.toAlgHom_apply, ← adjoin_image] at hb
refine adjoin_mono (fun y hy => ?_) hb
obtain ⟨b₁, ⟨⟨n, hn⟩, h₁⟩⟩ := hy
exact ⟨n, ⟨mem_union_left T hn.1, by rw [← h₁, ← map_pow, hn.2, map_one]⟩⟩
@[nontriviality]
theorem subsingleton_iff [Subsingleton B] : IsCyclotomicExtension S A B ↔ S = { } ∨ S = {1} := by
have : Subsingleton (Subalgebra A B) := inferInstance
constructor
· rintro ⟨hprim, -⟩
rw [← subset_singleton_iff_eq]
intro t ht
obtain ⟨ζ, hζ⟩ := hprim ht
rw [mem_singleton_iff, ← PNat.coe_eq_one_iff]
exact mod_cast hζ.unique (IsPrimitiveRoot.of_subsingleton ζ)
· rintro (rfl | rfl)
· exact ⟨fun h => h.elim, fun x => by convert (mem_top : x ∈ ⊤)⟩
· rw [iff_singleton]
exact ⟨⟨0, IsPrimitiveRoot.of_subsingleton 0⟩,
fun x => by convert (mem_top (R := A) : x ∈ ⊤)⟩
/-- If `B` is a cyclotomic extension of `A` given by roots of unity of order in `S ∪ T`, then `B`
is a cyclotomic extension of `adjoin A { b : B | ∃ a : ℕ+, a ∈ S ∧ b ^ (a : ℕ) = 1 }` given by
roots of unity of order in `T`. -/
theorem union_right [h : IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ T) A B] :
IsCyclotomicExtension T (adjoin A {b : B | ∃ a : ℕ+, a ∈ S ∧ b ^ (a : ℕ) = 1}) B := by
have : {b : B | ∃ n : ℕ+, n ∈ S ∪ T ∧ b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1} =
{b : B | ∃ n : ℕ+, n ∈ S ∧ b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1} ∪
{b : B | ∃ n : ℕ+, n ∈ T ∧ b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1} := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· rintro x ⟨n, hn₁ | hn₂, hnpow⟩
· left; exact ⟨n, hn₁, hnpow⟩
· right; exact ⟨n, hn₂, hnpow⟩
· rintro x (⟨n, hn⟩ | ⟨n, hn⟩)
· exact ⟨n, Or.inl hn.1, hn.2⟩
· exact ⟨n, Or.inr hn.1, hn.2⟩
refine ⟨fun hn => ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ A _).1 h).1 (mem_union_right S hn), fun b => ?_⟩
replace h := ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 h).2 b
rwa [this, adjoin_union_eq_adjoin_adjoin, Subalgebra.mem_restrictScalars] at h
/-- If `B` is a cyclotomic extension of `A` given by roots of unity of order in `T` and `S ⊆ T`,
then `adjoin A { b : B | ∃ a : ℕ+, a ∈ S ∧ b ^ (a : ℕ) = 1 }` is a cyclotomic extension of `B`
given by roots of unity of order in `S`. -/
theorem union_left [h : IsCyclotomicExtension T A B] (hS : S ⊆ T) :
IsCyclotomicExtension S A (adjoin A {b : B | ∃ a : ℕ+, a ∈ S ∧ b ^ (a : ℕ) = 1}) := by
refine ⟨@fun n hn => ?_, fun b => ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 h).1 (hS hn)
refine ⟨⟨b, subset_adjoin ⟨n, hn, hb.pow_eq_one⟩⟩, ?_⟩
rwa [← IsPrimitiveRoot.coe_submonoidClass_iff, Subtype.coe_mk]
· convert mem_top (R := A) (x := b)
rw [← adjoin_adjoin_coe_preimage, preimage_setOf_eq]
norm_cast
variable {n S}
/-- If `∀ s ∈ S, n ∣ s` and `S` is not empty, then `IsCyclotomicExtension S A B` implies
`IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ {n}) A B`. -/
theorem of_union_of_dvd (h : ∀ s ∈ S, n ∣ s) (hS : S.Nonempty) [H : IsCyclotomicExtension S A B] :
IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ {n}) A B := by
refine (iff_adjoin_eq_top _ A _).2 ⟨fun s hs => ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [mem_union, mem_singleton_iff] at hs
obtain hs | rfl := hs
· exact H.exists_prim_root hs
· obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := hS
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := h m hm
obtain ⟨ζ, hζ⟩ := H.exists_prim_root hm
refine ⟨ζ ^ (x : ℕ), ?_⟩
convert hζ.pow_of_dvd x.ne_zero (dvd_mul_left (x : ℕ) s)
simp only [PNat.mul_coe, Nat.mul_div_left, PNat.pos]
· refine _root_.eq_top_iff.2 ?_
rw [← ((iff_adjoin_eq_top S A B).1 H).2]
refine adjoin_mono fun x hx => ?_
simp only [union_singleton, mem_insert_iff, mem_setOf_eq] at hx ⊢
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := hx
exact ⟨m, ⟨Or.inr hm.1, hm.2⟩⟩
/-- If `∀ s ∈ S, n ∣ s` and `S` is not empty, then `IsCyclotomicExtension S A B` if and only if
`IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ {n}) A B`. -/
theorem iff_union_of_dvd (h : ∀ s ∈ S, n ∣ s) (hS : S.Nonempty) :
IsCyclotomicExtension S A B ↔ IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ {n}) A B := by
refine
⟨fun H => of_union_of_dvd A B h hS, fun H => (iff_adjoin_eq_top _ A _).2 ⟨fun s hs => ?_, ?_⟩⟩
· exact H.exists_prim_root (subset_union_left hs)
· rw [_root_.eq_top_iff, ← ((iff_adjoin_eq_top _ A B).1 H).2]
refine adjoin_mono fun x hx => ?_
simp only [union_singleton, mem_insert_iff, mem_setOf_eq] at hx ⊢
obtain ⟨m, rfl | hm, hxpow⟩ := hx
· obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hS
refine ⟨y, ⟨hy, ?_⟩⟩
obtain ⟨z, rfl⟩ := h y hy
simp only [PNat.mul_coe, pow_mul, hxpow, one_pow]
· exact ⟨m, ⟨hm, hxpow⟩⟩
variable (n S)
/-- `IsCyclotomicExtension S A B` is equivalent to `IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ {1}) A B`. -/
theorem iff_union_singleton_one :
IsCyclotomicExtension S A B ↔ IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ {1}) A B := by
obtain hS | rfl := S.eq_empty_or_nonempty.symm
· exact iff_union_of_dvd _ _ (fun s _ => one_dvd _) hS
rw [empty_union]
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => ?_⟩
· refine (iff_adjoin_eq_top _ A _).2 ⟨fun s hs => ⟨1, by simp [mem_singleton_iff.1 hs]⟩, ?_⟩
simp [adjoin_singleton_one, empty]
· refine (iff_adjoin_eq_top _ A _).2 ⟨fun s hs => (not_mem_empty s hs).elim, ?_⟩
simp [@singleton_one A B _ _ _ H]
variable {A B}
/-- If `(⊥ : SubAlgebra A B) = ⊤`, then `IsCyclotomicExtension {1} A B`. -/
theorem singleton_one_of_bot_eq_top (h : (⊥ : Subalgebra A B) = ⊤) :
IsCyclotomicExtension {1} A B := by
convert (iff_union_singleton_one _ A _).1 (singleton_zero_of_bot_eq_top h)
simp
/-- If `Function.Surjective (algebraMap A B)`, then `IsCyclotomicExtension {1} A B`. -/
theorem singleton_one_of_algebraMap_bijective (h : Function.Surjective (algebraMap A B)) :
IsCyclotomicExtension {1} A B :=
singleton_one_of_bot_eq_top (surjective_algebraMap_iff.1 h).symm
variable (A B)
/-- Given `(f : B ≃ₐ[A] C)`, if `IsCyclotomicExtension S A B` then
`IsCyclotomicExtension S A C`. -/
protected
theorem equiv {C : Type*} [CommRing C] [Algebra A C] [h : IsCyclotomicExtension S A B]
(f : B ≃ₐ[A] C) : IsCyclotomicExtension S A C := by
| letI : Algebra B C := f.toAlgHom.toRingHom.toAlgebra
haveI : IsCyclotomicExtension {1} B C := singleton_one_of_algebraMap_bijective f.surjective
haveI : IsScalarTower A B C := IsScalarTower.of_algHom f.toAlgHom
exact (iff_union_singleton_one _ _ _).2 (trans S {1} A B C f.injective)
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Cyclotomic/Basic.lean | 265 | 268 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov, Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Fin
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin.Basic
/-!
# Big operators and `Fin`
Some results about products and sums over the type `Fin`.
The most important results are the induction formulas `Fin.prod_univ_castSucc`
and `Fin.prod_univ_succ`, and the formula `Fin.prod_const` for the product of a
constant function. These results have variants for sums instead of products.
## Main declarations
* `finFunctionFinEquiv`: An explicit equivalence between `Fin n → Fin m` and `Fin (m ^ n)`.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Finset
variable {α M : Type*}
namespace Finset
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range [CommMonoid M] {n : ℕ} (f : ℕ → M) :
∏ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i = ∏ i : Fin n, f i :=
(Fin.prod_univ_eq_prod_range _ _).symm
end Finset
namespace Fin
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid M] {n : ℕ}
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_ofFn (f : Fin n → M) : (List.ofFn f).prod = ∏ i, f i := by
simp [prod_eq_multiset_prod]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_def (f : Fin n → M) : ∏ i, f i = ((List.finRange n).map f).prod := by
rw [← List.ofFn_eq_map, prod_ofFn]
/-- A product of a function `f : Fin 0 → M` is `1` because `Fin 0` is empty -/
@[to_additive "A sum of a function `f : Fin 0 → M` is `0` because `Fin 0` is empty"]
theorem prod_univ_zero (f : Fin 0 → M) : ∏ i, f i = 1 :=
rfl
/-- A product of a function `f : Fin (n + 1) → M` over all `Fin (n + 1)`
is the product of `f x`, for some `x : Fin (n + 1)` times the remaining product -/
@[to_additive "A sum of a function `f : Fin (n + 1) → M` over all `Fin (n + 1)` is the sum of
`f x`, for some `x : Fin (n + 1)` plus the remaining sum"]
theorem prod_univ_succAbove (f : Fin (n + 1) → M) (x : Fin (n + 1)) :
∏ i, f i = f x * ∏ i : Fin n, f (x.succAbove i) := by
rw [univ_succAbove n x, prod_cons, Finset.prod_map, coe_succAboveEmb]
/-- A product of a function `f : Fin (n + 1) → M` over all `Fin (n + 1)`
is the product of `f 0` plus the remaining product -/
@[to_additive "A sum of a function `f : Fin (n + 1) → M` over all `Fin (n + 1)` is the sum of
`f 0` plus the remaining sum"]
theorem prod_univ_succ (f : Fin (n + 1) → M) :
∏ i, f i = f 0 * ∏ i : Fin n, f i.succ :=
prod_univ_succAbove f 0
/-- A product of a function `f : Fin (n + 1) → M` over all `Fin (n + 1)`
is the product of `f (Fin.last n)` plus the remaining product -/
@[to_additive "A sum of a function `f : Fin (n + 1) → M` over all `Fin (n + 1)` is the sum of
`f (Fin.last n)` plus the remaining sum"]
theorem prod_univ_castSucc (f : Fin (n + 1) → M) :
∏ i, f i = (∏ i : Fin n, f (Fin.castSucc i)) * f (last n) := by
simpa [mul_comm] using prod_univ_succAbove f (last n)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_univ_getElem (l : List M) : ∏ i : Fin l.length, l[i.1] = l.prod := by
simp [Finset.prod_eq_multiset_prod]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-19")]
alias sum_univ_get := sum_univ_getElem
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2025-04-19")]
alias prod_univ_get := prod_univ_getElem
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_univ_fun_getElem (l : List α) (f : α → M) :
∏ i : Fin l.length, f l[i.1] = (l.map f).prod := by
simp [Finset.prod_eq_multiset_prod]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-19")]
alias sum_univ_get' := sum_univ_fun_getElem
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2025-04-19")]
alias prod_univ_get' := prod_univ_fun_getElem
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_cons (x : M) (f : Fin n → M) :
(∏ i : Fin n.succ, (cons x f : Fin n.succ → M) i) = x * ∏ i : Fin n, f i := by
simp_rw [prod_univ_succ, cons_zero, cons_succ]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_snoc (x : M) (f : Fin n → M) :
(∏ i : Fin n.succ, (snoc f x : Fin n.succ → M) i) = (∏ i : Fin n, f i) * x := by
simp [prod_univ_castSucc]
@[to_additive sum_univ_one]
theorem prod_univ_one (f : Fin 1 → M) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 := by simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_univ_two (f : Fin 2 → M) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 := by
simp [prod_univ_succ]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_two' (f : α → M) (a b : α) : ∏ i, f (![a, b] i) = f a * f b :=
prod_univ_two _
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_three (f : Fin 3 → M) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 * f 2 := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc, prod_univ_two]
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_four (f : Fin 4 → M) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 * f 2 * f 3 := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc, prod_univ_three]
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_five (f : Fin 5 → M) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 * f 2 * f 3 * f 4 := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc, prod_univ_four]
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_six (f : Fin 6 → M) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 * f 2 * f 3 * f 4 * f 5 := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc, prod_univ_five]
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_seven (f : Fin 7 → M) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 * f 2 * f 3 * f 4 * f 5 * f 6 := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc, prod_univ_six]
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_eight (f : Fin 8 → M) :
∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 * f 2 * f 3 * f 4 * f 5 * f 6 * f 7 := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc, prod_univ_seven]
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_const (n : ℕ) (x : M) : ∏ _i : Fin n, x = x ^ n := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ioi_zero {v : Fin n.succ → M} :
∏ i ∈ Ioi 0, v i = ∏ j : Fin n, v j.succ := by
rw [Ioi_zero_eq_map, Finset.prod_map, coe_succEmb]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_Ioi_succ (i : Fin n) (v : Fin n.succ → M) :
∏ j ∈ Ioi i.succ, v j = ∏ j ∈ Ioi i, v j.succ := by
rw [← map_succEmb_Ioi, Finset.prod_map, coe_succEmb]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_congr' {a b : ℕ} (f : Fin b → M) (h : a = b) :
(∏ i : Fin a, f (i.cast h)) = ∏ i : Fin b, f i := by
subst h
congr
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_add {a b : ℕ} (f : Fin (a + b) → M) :
(∏ i : Fin (a + b), f i) = (∏ i : Fin a, f (castAdd b i)) * ∏ i : Fin b, f (natAdd a i) := by
rw [Fintype.prod_equiv finSumFinEquiv.symm f fun i => f (finSumFinEquiv.toFun i)]
· apply Fintype.prod_sum_type
· intro x
simp only [Equiv.toFun_as_coe, Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_trunc {a b : ℕ} (f : Fin (a + b) → M) (hf : ∀ j : Fin b, f (natAdd a j) = 1) :
(∏ i : Fin (a + b), f i) = ∏ i : Fin a, f (castAdd b i) := by
rw [prod_univ_add, Fintype.prod_eq_one _ hf, mul_one]
end CommMonoid
theorem sum_pow_mul_eq_add_pow {n : ℕ} {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (a b : R) :
(∑ s : Finset (Fin n), a ^ s.card * b ^ (n - s.card)) = (a + b) ^ n := by
simpa using Fintype.sum_pow_mul_eq_add_pow (Fin n) a b
lemma sum_neg_one_pow (R : Type*) [Ring R] (m : ℕ) :
(∑ n : Fin m, (-1) ^ n.1 : R) = if Even m then 0 else 1 := by
induction m with
| zero => simp
| succ n IH =>
simp only [Fin.sum_univ_castSucc, Fin.coe_castSucc, IH, Fin.val_last,
Nat.even_add_one, ← Nat.not_even_iff_odd, ite_not]
split_ifs with h
· simp [*]
· simp [(Nat.not_even_iff_odd.mp h).neg_pow]
section PartialProd
| variable [Monoid α] {n : ℕ}
/-- For `f = (a₁, ..., aₙ)` in `αⁿ`, `partialProd f` is `(1, a₁, a₁a₂, ..., a₁...aₙ)` in `αⁿ⁺¹`. -/
@[to_additive "For `f = (a₁, ..., aₙ)` in `αⁿ`, `partialSum f` is\n
`(0, a₁, a₁ + a₂, ..., a₁ + ... + aₙ)` in `αⁿ⁺¹`."]
def partialProd (f : Fin n → α) (i : Fin (n + 1)) : α :=
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/Fin.lean | 208 | 213 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.CliffordAlgebra.Conjugation
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.CliffordAlgebra.Even
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.QuadraticForm.Prod
import Mathlib.Tactic.LiftLets
/-!
# Isomorphisms with the even subalgebra of a Clifford algebra
This file provides some notable isomorphisms regarding the even subalgebra, `CliffordAlgebra.even`.
## Main definitions
* `CliffordAlgebra.equivEven`: Every Clifford algebra is isomorphic as an algebra to the even
subalgebra of a Clifford algebra with one more dimension.
* `CliffordAlgebra.EquivEven.Q'`: The quadratic form used by this "one-up" algebra.
* `CliffordAlgebra.toEven`: The simp-normal form of the forward direction of this isomorphism.
* `CliffordAlgebra.ofEven`: The simp-normal form of the reverse direction of this isomorphism.
* `CliffordAlgebra.evenEquivEvenNeg`: Every even subalgebra is isomorphic to the even subalgebra
of the Clifford algebra with negated quadratic form.
* `CliffordAlgebra.evenToNeg`: The simp-normal form of each direction of this isomorphism.
## Main results
* `CliffordAlgebra.coe_toEven_reverse_involute`: the behavior of `CliffordAlgebra.toEven` on the
"Clifford conjugate", that is `CliffordAlgebra.reverse` composed with
`CliffordAlgebra.involute`.
-/
namespace CliffordAlgebra
variable {R M : Type*} [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable (Q : QuadraticForm R M)
/-! ### Constructions needed for `CliffordAlgebra.equivEven` -/
namespace EquivEven
/-- The quadratic form on the augmented vector space `M × R` sending `v + r•e0` to `Q v - r^2`. -/
abbrev Q' : QuadraticForm R (M × R) :=
Q.prod <| -QuadraticMap.sq (R := R)
theorem Q'_apply (m : M × R) : Q' Q m = Q m.1 - m.2 * m.2 :=
(sub_eq_add_neg _ _).symm
/-- The unit vector in the new dimension -/
def e0 : CliffordAlgebra (Q' Q) :=
ι (Q' Q) (0, 1)
/-- The embedding from the existing vector space -/
def v : M →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra (Q' Q) :=
ι (Q' Q) ∘ₗ LinearMap.inl _ _ _
theorem ι_eq_v_add_smul_e0 (m : M) (r : R) : ι (Q' Q) (m, r) = v Q m + r • e0 Q := by
rw [e0, v, LinearMap.comp_apply, LinearMap.inl_apply, ← LinearMap.map_smul, Prod.smul_mk,
smul_zero, smul_eq_mul, mul_one, ← LinearMap.map_add, Prod.mk_add_mk, zero_add, add_zero]
theorem e0_mul_e0 : e0 Q * e0 Q = -1 :=
(ι_sq_scalar _ _).trans <| by simp
theorem v_sq_scalar (m : M) : v Q m * v Q m = algebraMap _ _ (Q m) :=
(ι_sq_scalar _ _).trans <| by simp
theorem neg_e0_mul_v (m : M) : -(e0 Q * v Q m) = v Q m * e0 Q := by
refine neg_eq_of_add_eq_zero_right ((ι_mul_ι_add_swap _ _).trans ?_)
dsimp [QuadraticMap.polar]
simp only [add_zero, mul_zero, mul_one, zero_add, neg_zero, QuadraticMap.map_zero,
add_sub_cancel_right, sub_self, map_zero, zero_sub]
theorem neg_v_mul_e0 (m : M) : -(v Q m * e0 Q) = e0 Q * v Q m := by
rw [neg_eq_iff_eq_neg]
exact (neg_e0_mul_v _ m).symm
@[simp]
theorem e0_mul_v_mul_e0 (m : M) : e0 Q * v Q m * e0 Q = v Q m := by
rw [← neg_v_mul_e0, ← neg_mul, mul_assoc, e0_mul_e0, mul_neg_one, neg_neg]
@[simp]
theorem reverse_v (m : M) : reverse (Q := Q' Q) (v Q m) = v Q m :=
reverse_ι _
@[simp]
theorem involute_v (m : M) : involute (v Q m) = -v Q m :=
involute_ι _
@[simp]
theorem reverse_e0 : reverse (Q := Q' Q) (e0 Q) = e0 Q :=
reverse_ι _
@[simp]
theorem involute_e0 : involute (e0 Q) = -e0 Q :=
involute_ι _
end EquivEven
open EquivEven
/-- The embedding from the smaller algebra into the new larger one. -/
def toEven : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra.even (Q' Q) := by
refine CliffordAlgebra.lift Q ⟨?_, fun m => ?_⟩
· refine LinearMap.codRestrict _ ?_ fun m => Submodule.mem_iSup_of_mem ⟨2, rfl⟩ ?_
· exact (LinearMap.mulLeft R <| e0 Q).comp (v Q)
rw [Subtype.coe_mk, pow_two]
exact Submodule.mul_mem_mul (LinearMap.mem_range_self _ _) (LinearMap.mem_range_self _ _)
· ext1
rw [Subalgebra.coe_mul] -- Porting note: was part of the `dsimp only` below
erw [LinearMap.codRestrict_apply] -- Porting note: was part of the `dsimp only` below
dsimp only [LinearMap.comp_apply, LinearMap.mulLeft_apply, Subalgebra.coe_algebraMap]
rw [← mul_assoc, e0_mul_v_mul_e0, v_sq_scalar]
theorem toEven_ι (m : M) : (toEven Q (ι Q m) : CliffordAlgebra (Q' Q)) = e0 Q * v Q m := by
rw [toEven, CliffordAlgebra.lift_ι_apply]
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11224): was `rw`
erw [LinearMap.codRestrict_apply]
rw [LinearMap.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, LinearMap.mulLeft_apply]
/-- The embedding from the even subalgebra with an extra dimension into the original algebra. -/
def ofEven : CliffordAlgebra.even (Q' Q) →ₐ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q := by
/-
Recall that we need:
* `f ⟨0,1⟩ ⟨x,0⟩ = ι x`
* `f ⟨x,0⟩ ⟨0,1⟩ = -ι x`
* `f ⟨x,0⟩ ⟨y,0⟩ = ι x * ι y`
* `f ⟨0,1⟩ ⟨0,1⟩ = -1`
-/
let f : M × R →ₗ[R] M × R →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q :=
((Algebra.lmul R (CliffordAlgebra Q)).toLinearMap.comp <|
(ι Q).comp (LinearMap.fst _ _ _) +
(Algebra.linearMap R _).comp (LinearMap.snd _ _ _)).compl₂
((ι Q).comp (LinearMap.fst _ _ _) - (Algebra.linearMap R _).comp (LinearMap.snd _ _ _))
haveI f_apply : ∀ x y, f x y = (ι Q x.1 + algebraMap R _ x.2) * (ι Q y.1 - algebraMap R _ y.2) :=
fun x y => by rfl
haveI hc : ∀ (r : R) (x : CliffordAlgebra Q), Commute (algebraMap _ _ r) x := Algebra.commutes
haveI hm :
∀ m : M × R,
ι Q m.1 * ι Q m.1 - algebraMap R _ m.2 * algebraMap R _ m.2 = algebraMap R _ (Q' Q m) := by
intro m
rw [ι_sq_scalar, ← RingHom.map_mul, ← RingHom.map_sub, sub_eq_add_neg, Q'_apply, sub_eq_add_neg]
refine even.lift (Q' Q) ⟨f, ?_, ?_⟩ <;> simp_rw [f_apply]
· intro m
rw [← (hc _ _).symm.mul_self_sub_mul_self_eq, hm]
· intro m₁ m₂ m₃
rw [← mul_smul_comm, ← mul_assoc, mul_assoc (_ + _), ← (hc _ _).symm.mul_self_sub_mul_self_eq',
Algebra.smul_def, ← mul_assoc, hm]
theorem ofEven_ι (x y : M × R) :
ofEven Q ((even.ι (Q' Q)).bilin x y) =
(ι Q x.1 + algebraMap R _ x.2) * (ι Q y.1 - algebraMap R _ y.2) :=
even.lift_ι (Q' Q) _ x y
theorem toEven_comp_ofEven : (toEven Q).comp (ofEven Q) = AlgHom.id R _ :=
even.algHom_ext (Q' Q) <|
EvenHom.ext <|
LinearMap.ext fun m₁ =>
LinearMap.ext fun m₂ =>
Subtype.ext <|
let ⟨m₁, r₁⟩ := m₁
let ⟨m₂, r₂⟩ := m₂
calc
↑(toEven Q (ofEven Q ((even.ι (Q' Q)).bilin (m₁, r₁) (m₂, r₂)))) =
(e0 Q * v Q m₁ + algebraMap R _ r₁) * (e0 Q * v Q m₂ - algebraMap R _ r₂) := by
rw [ofEven_ι, map_mul, map_add, map_sub, AlgHom.commutes,
AlgHom.commutes, Subalgebra.coe_mul, Subalgebra.coe_add, Subalgebra.coe_sub,
toEven_ι, toEven_ι, Subalgebra.coe_algebraMap, Subalgebra.coe_algebraMap]
_ =
e0 Q * v Q m₁ * (e0 Q * v Q m₂) + r₁ • e0 Q * v Q m₂ - r₂ • e0 Q * v Q m₁ -
| algebraMap R _ (r₁ * r₂) := by
rw [mul_sub, add_mul, add_mul, ← Algebra.commutes, ← Algebra.smul_def, ← map_mul, ←
Algebra.smul_def, sub_add_eq_sub_sub, smul_mul_assoc, smul_mul_assoc]
_ =
v Q m₁ * v Q m₂ + r₁ • e0 Q * v Q m₂ + v Q m₁ * r₂ • e0 Q +
r₁ • e0 Q * r₂ • e0 Q := by
have h1 : e0 Q * v Q m₁ * (e0 Q * v Q m₂) = v Q m₁ * v Q m₂ := by
rw [← mul_assoc, e0_mul_v_mul_e0]
have h2 : -(r₂ • e0 Q * v Q m₁) = v Q m₁ * r₂ • e0 Q := by
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/CliffordAlgebra/EvenEquiv.lean | 174 | 182 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Jz Pan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jz Pan
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Equiv.TransferInstance
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Finiteness.Cardinality
/-!
# Orzech property of rings
In this file we define the following property of rings:
- `OrzechProperty R` is a type class stating that `R` satisfies the following property:
for any finitely generated `R`-module `M`, any surjective homomorphism `f : N → M`
from a submodule `N` of `M` to `M` is injective.
It was introduced in papers by Orzech [orzech1971], Djoković [djokovic1973] and
Ribenboim [ribenboim1971], under the names `Π`-ring or `Π₁`-ring.
It implies the strong rank condition (that is, the existence of an injective linear map
`(Fin n → R) →ₗ[R] (Fin m → R)` implies `n ≤ m`)
if the ring is nontrivial (see `Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/InvariantBasisNumber.lean`).
It's proved in the above papers that
- a left Noetherian ring (not necessarily commutative) satisfies the `OrzechProperty`,
which in particular includes the division ring case
(see `Mathlib/RingTheory/Noetherian.lean`);
- a commutative ring satisfies the `OrzechProperty`
(see `Mathlib/RingTheory/FiniteType.lean`).
## References
* [Orzech, Morris. *Onto endomorphisms are isomorphisms*][orzech1971]
* [Djoković, D. Ž. *Epimorphisms of modules which must be isomorphisms*][djokovic1973]
* [Ribenboim, Paulo.
*Épimorphismes de modules qui sont nécessairement des isomorphismes*][ribenboim1971]
## Tags
free module, rank, Orzech property, (strong) rank condition, invariant basis number, IBN
-/
universe u v w
open Function
variable (R : Type u) [Semiring R]
/-- A ring `R` satisfies the Orzech property, if for any finitely generated `R`-module `M`,
any surjective homomorphism `f : N → M` from a submodule `N` of `M` to `M` is injective.
NOTE: In the definition we need to assume that `M` has the same universe level as `R`, but it
in fact implies the universe polymorphic versions
`OrzechProperty.injective_of_surjective_of_injective`
and `OrzechProperty.injective_of_surjective_of_submodule`. -/
@[mk_iff]
class OrzechProperty : Prop where
injective_of_surjective_of_submodule' : ∀ {M : Type u} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
[Module.Finite R M] {N : Submodule R M} (f : N →ₗ[R] M), Surjective f → Injective f
namespace OrzechProperty
variable {R}
variable [OrzechProperty R] {M : Type v} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [Module.Finite R M]
| theorem injective_of_surjective_of_injective
{N : Type w} [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
(i f : N →ₗ[R] M) (hi : Injective i) (hf : Surjective f) : Injective f := by
obtain ⟨n, g, hg⟩ := Module.Finite.exists_fin' R M
haveI := small_of_surjective hg
letI := Equiv.addCommMonoid (equivShrink M).symm
letI := Equiv.module R (equivShrink M).symm
let j : Shrink.{u} M ≃ₗ[R] M := Equiv.linearEquiv R (equivShrink M).symm
haveI := Module.Finite.equiv j.symm
let i' := j.symm.toLinearMap ∘ₗ i
replace hi : Injective i' := by simpa [i'] using hi
let f' := j.symm.toLinearMap ∘ₗ f ∘ₗ (LinearEquiv.ofInjective i' hi).symm.toLinearMap
replace hf : Surjective f' := by simpa [f'] using hf
simpa [f'] using injective_of_surjective_of_submodule' f' hf
| Mathlib/RingTheory/OrzechProperty.lean | 69 | 82 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Exp
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Defs
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Real
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.CharZero
/-!
# Real logarithm
In this file we define `Real.log` to be the logarithm of a real number. As usual, we extend it from
its domain `(0, +∞)` to a globally defined function. We choose to do it so that `log 0 = 0` and
`log (-x) = log x`.
We prove some basic properties of this function and show that it is continuous.
## Tags
logarithm, continuity
-/
open Set Filter Function
open Topology
noncomputable section
namespace Real
variable {x y : ℝ}
/-- The real logarithm function, equal to the inverse of the exponential for `x > 0`,
to `log |x|` for `x < 0`, and to `0` for `0`. We use this unconventional extension to
`(-∞, 0]` as it gives the formula `log (x * y) = log x + log y` for all nonzero `x` and `y`, and
the derivative of `log` is `1/x` away from `0`. -/
@[pp_nodot]
noncomputable def log (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
if hx : x = 0 then 0 else expOrderIso.symm ⟨|x|, abs_pos.2 hx⟩
theorem log_of_ne_zero (hx : x ≠ 0) : log x = expOrderIso.symm ⟨|x|, abs_pos.2 hx⟩ :=
dif_neg hx
theorem log_of_pos (hx : 0 < x) : log x = expOrderIso.symm ⟨x, hx⟩ := by
rw [log_of_ne_zero hx.ne']
congr
exact abs_of_pos hx
theorem exp_log_eq_abs (hx : x ≠ 0) : exp (log x) = |x| := by
rw [log_of_ne_zero hx, ← coe_expOrderIso_apply, OrderIso.apply_symm_apply, Subtype.coe_mk]
theorem exp_log (hx : 0 < x) : exp (log x) = x := by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs hx.ne']
exact abs_of_pos hx
theorem exp_log_of_neg (hx : x < 0) : exp (log x) = -x := by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs (ne_of_lt hx)]
exact abs_of_neg hx
theorem le_exp_log (x : ℝ) : x ≤ exp (log x) := by
by_cases h_zero : x = 0
· rw [h_zero, log, dif_pos rfl, exp_zero]
exact zero_le_one
· rw [exp_log_eq_abs h_zero]
exact le_abs_self _
@[simp]
theorem log_exp (x : ℝ) : log (exp x) = x :=
exp_injective <| exp_log (exp_pos x)
theorem exp_one_mul_le_exp {x : ℝ} : exp 1 * x ≤ exp x := by
by_cases hx0 : x ≤ 0
· apply le_trans (mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos (exp_pos 1).le hx0) (exp_nonneg x)
· have h := add_one_le_exp (log x)
rwa [← exp_le_exp, exp_add, exp_log (lt_of_not_le hx0), mul_comm] at h
theorem two_mul_le_exp {x : ℝ} : 2 * x ≤ exp x := by
by_cases hx0 : x < 0
· exact le_trans (mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos (by simp only [Nat.ofNat_nonneg]) hx0.le)
(exp_nonneg x)
· apply le_trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right _ (le_of_not_lt hx0)) exp_one_mul_le_exp
have := Real.add_one_le_exp 1
rwa [one_add_one_eq_two] at this
theorem surjOn_log : SurjOn log (Ioi 0) univ := fun x _ => ⟨exp x, exp_pos x, log_exp x⟩
theorem log_surjective : Surjective log := fun x => ⟨exp x, log_exp x⟩
@[simp]
theorem range_log : range log = univ :=
log_surjective.range_eq
@[simp]
theorem log_zero : log 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
@[simp]
theorem log_one : log 1 = 0 :=
exp_injective <| by rw [exp_log zero_lt_one, exp_zero]
/-- This holds true for all `x : ℝ` because of the junk values `0 / 0 = 0` and `log 0 = 0`. -/
@[simp] lemma log_div_self (x : ℝ) : log (x / x) = 0 := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0 <;> simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem log_abs (x : ℝ) : log |x| = log x := by
by_cases h : x = 0
· simp [h]
· rw [← exp_eq_exp, exp_log_eq_abs h, exp_log_eq_abs (abs_pos.2 h).ne', abs_abs]
@[simp]
theorem log_neg_eq_log (x : ℝ) : log (-x) = log x := by rw [← log_abs x, ← log_abs (-x), abs_neg]
theorem sinh_log {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : sinh (log x) = (x - x⁻¹) / 2 := by
rw [sinh_eq, exp_neg, exp_log hx]
theorem cosh_log {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : cosh (log x) = (x + x⁻¹) / 2 := by
rw [cosh_eq, exp_neg, exp_log hx]
theorem surjOn_log' : SurjOn log (Iio 0) univ := fun x _ =>
⟨-exp x, neg_lt_zero.2 <| exp_pos x, by rw [log_neg_eq_log, log_exp]⟩
theorem log_mul (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) : log (x * y) = log x + log y :=
exp_injective <| by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs (mul_ne_zero hx hy), exp_add, exp_log_eq_abs hx, exp_log_eq_abs hy, abs_mul]
theorem log_div (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) : log (x / y) = log x - log y :=
exp_injective <| by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs (div_ne_zero hx hy), exp_sub, exp_log_eq_abs hx, exp_log_eq_abs hy, abs_div]
@[simp]
theorem log_inv (x : ℝ) : log x⁻¹ = -log x := by
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
rw [← exp_eq_exp, exp_log_eq_abs (inv_ne_zero hx), exp_neg, exp_log_eq_abs hx, abs_inv]
theorem log_le_log_iff (h : 0 < x) (h₁ : 0 < y) : log x ≤ log y ↔ x ≤ y := by
rw [← exp_le_exp, exp_log h, exp_log h₁]
@[gcongr, bound]
lemma log_le_log (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x ≤ y) : log x ≤ log y :=
(log_le_log_iff hx (hx.trans_le hxy)).2 hxy
@[gcongr, bound]
theorem log_lt_log (hx : 0 < x) (h : x < y) : log x < log y := by
rwa [← exp_lt_exp, exp_log hx, exp_log (lt_trans hx h)]
theorem log_lt_log_iff (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) : log x < log y ↔ x < y := by
rw [← exp_lt_exp, exp_log hx, exp_log hy]
theorem log_le_iff_le_exp (hx : 0 < x) : log x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ exp y := by rw [← exp_le_exp, exp_log hx]
theorem log_lt_iff_lt_exp (hx : 0 < x) : log x < y ↔ x < exp y := by rw [← exp_lt_exp, exp_log hx]
theorem le_log_iff_exp_le (hy : 0 < y) : x ≤ log y ↔ exp x ≤ y := by rw [← exp_le_exp, exp_log hy]
theorem lt_log_iff_exp_lt (hy : 0 < y) : x < log y ↔ exp x < y := by rw [← exp_lt_exp, exp_log hy]
theorem log_pos_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) : 0 < log x ↔ 1 < x := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hx)
· simp [le_refl, zero_le_one]
rw [← log_one]
exact log_lt_log_iff zero_lt_one hx
@[bound]
theorem log_pos (hx : 1 < x) : 0 < log x :=
(log_pos_iff (lt_trans zero_lt_one hx).le).2 hx
theorem log_pos_of_lt_neg_one (hx : x < -1) : 0 < log x := by
rw [← neg_neg x, log_neg_eq_log]
have : 1 < -x := by linarith
exact log_pos this
theorem log_neg_iff (h : 0 < x) : log x < 0 ↔ x < 1 := by
rw [← log_one]
exact log_lt_log_iff h zero_lt_one
@[bound]
theorem log_neg (h0 : 0 < x) (h1 : x < 1) : log x < 0 :=
(log_neg_iff h0).2 h1
theorem log_neg_of_lt_zero (h0 : x < 0) (h1 : -1 < x) : log x < 0 := by
rw [← neg_neg x, log_neg_eq_log]
have h0' : 0 < -x := by linarith
have h1' : -x < 1 := by linarith
exact log_neg h0' h1'
theorem log_nonneg_iff (hx : 0 < x) : 0 ≤ log x ↔ 1 ≤ x := by rw [← not_lt, log_neg_iff hx, not_lt]
@[bound]
theorem log_nonneg (hx : 1 ≤ x) : 0 ≤ log x :=
(log_nonneg_iff (zero_lt_one.trans_le hx)).2 hx
theorem log_nonpos_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) : log x ≤ 0 ↔ x ≤ 1 := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hx)
· simp [le_refl, zero_le_one]
rw [← not_lt, log_pos_iff hx.le, not_lt]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-16")]
alias log_nonpos_iff' := log_nonpos_iff
@[bound]
theorem log_nonpos (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h'x : x ≤ 1) : log x ≤ 0 :=
(log_nonpos_iff hx).2 h'x
theorem log_natCast_nonneg (n : ℕ) : 0 ≤ log n := by
if hn : n = 0 then
simp [hn]
else
have : (1 : ℝ) ≤ n := mod_cast Nat.one_le_of_lt <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn
exact log_nonneg this
theorem log_neg_natCast_nonneg (n : ℕ) : 0 ≤ log (-n) := by
rw [← log_neg_eq_log, neg_neg]
exact log_natCast_nonneg _
theorem log_intCast_nonneg (n : ℤ) : 0 ≤ log n := by
cases lt_trichotomy 0 n with
| inl hn =>
have : (1 : ℝ) ≤ n := mod_cast hn
exact log_nonneg this
| inr hn =>
cases hn with
| inl hn => simp [hn.symm]
| inr hn =>
have : (1 : ℝ) ≤ -n := by rw [← neg_zero, ← lt_neg] at hn; exact mod_cast hn
rw [← log_neg_eq_log]
exact log_nonneg this
theorem strictMonoOn_log : StrictMonoOn log (Set.Ioi 0) := fun _ hx _ _ hxy => log_lt_log hx hxy
theorem strictAntiOn_log : StrictAntiOn log (Set.Iio 0) := by
rintro x (hx : x < 0) y (hy : y < 0) hxy
rw [← log_abs y, ← log_abs x]
refine log_lt_log (abs_pos.2 hy.ne) ?_
rwa [abs_of_neg hy, abs_of_neg hx, neg_lt_neg_iff]
theorem log_injOn_pos : Set.InjOn log (Set.Ioi 0) :=
strictMonoOn_log.injOn
theorem log_lt_sub_one_of_pos (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x ≠ 1) : log x < x - 1 := by
have h : log x ≠ 0 := by
rwa [← log_one, log_injOn_pos.ne_iff hx1]
exact mem_Ioi.mpr zero_lt_one
linarith [add_one_lt_exp h, exp_log hx1]
theorem eq_one_of_pos_of_log_eq_zero {x : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 < x) (h₂ : log x = 0) : x = 1 :=
log_injOn_pos (Set.mem_Ioi.2 h₁) (Set.mem_Ioi.2 zero_lt_one) (h₂.trans Real.log_one.symm)
theorem log_ne_zero_of_pos_of_ne_one {x : ℝ} (hx_pos : 0 < x) (hx : x ≠ 1) : log x ≠ 0 :=
mt (eq_one_of_pos_of_log_eq_zero hx_pos) hx
@[simp]
theorem log_eq_zero {x : ℝ} : log x = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∨ x = 1 ∨ x = -1 := by
constructor
· intro h
rcases lt_trichotomy x 0 with (x_lt_zero | rfl | x_gt_zero)
· refine Or.inr (Or.inr (neg_eq_iff_eq_neg.mp ?_))
rw [← log_neg_eq_log x] at h
exact eq_one_of_pos_of_log_eq_zero (neg_pos.mpr x_lt_zero) h
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr (Or.inl (eq_one_of_pos_of_log_eq_zero x_gt_zero h))
· rintro (rfl | rfl | rfl) <;> simp only [log_one, log_zero, log_neg_eq_log]
theorem log_ne_zero {x : ℝ} : log x ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ x ≠ 1 ∧ x ≠ -1 := by
simpa only [not_or] using log_eq_zero.not
@[simp]
theorem log_pow (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : log (x ^ n) = n * log x := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
· rw [pow_succ, log_mul (pow_ne_zero _ hx) hx, ih, Nat.cast_succ, add_mul, one_mul]
@[simp]
theorem log_zpow (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : log (x ^ n) = n * log x := by
cases n
· rw [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, zpow_natCast, log_pow, Int.cast_natCast]
· rw [zpow_negSucc, log_inv, log_pow, Int.cast_negSucc, Nat.cast_add_one, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul]
theorem log_sqrt {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : log (√x) = log x / 2 := by
rw [eq_div_iff, mul_comm, ← Nat.cast_two, ← log_pow, sq_sqrt hx]
exact two_ne_zero
theorem log_le_sub_one_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : log x ≤ x - 1 := by
rw [le_sub_iff_add_le]
convert add_one_le_exp (log x)
rw [exp_log hx]
lemma one_sub_inv_le_log_of_pos (hx : 0 < x) : 1 - x⁻¹ ≤ log x := by
simpa [add_comm] using log_le_sub_one_of_pos (inv_pos.2 hx)
/-- See `Real.log_le_sub_one_of_pos` for the stronger version when `x ≠ 0`. -/
lemma log_le_self (hx : 0 ≤ x) : log x ≤ x := by
obtain rfl | hx := hx.eq_or_lt
· simp
· exact (log_le_sub_one_of_pos hx).trans (by linarith)
/-- See `Real.one_sub_inv_le_log_of_pos` for the stronger version when `x ≠ 0`. -/
lemma neg_inv_le_log (hx : 0 ≤ x) : -x⁻¹ ≤ log x := by
rw [neg_le, ← log_inv]; exact log_le_self <| inv_nonneg.2 hx
/-- Bound for `|log x * x|` in the interval `(0, 1]`. -/
theorem abs_log_mul_self_lt (x : ℝ) (h1 : 0 < x) (h2 : x ≤ 1) : |log x * x| < 1 := by
have : 0 < 1 / x := by simpa only [one_div, inv_pos] using h1
replace := log_le_sub_one_of_pos this
replace : log (1 / x) < 1 / x := by linarith
rw [log_div one_ne_zero h1.ne', log_one, zero_sub, lt_div_iff₀ h1] at this
have aux : 0 ≤ -log x * x := by
refine mul_nonneg ?_ h1.le
rw [← log_inv]
apply log_nonneg
rw [← le_inv_comm₀ h1 zero_lt_one, inv_one]
exact h2
rw [← abs_of_nonneg aux, neg_mul, abs_neg] at this
exact this
/-- The real logarithm function tends to `+∞` at `+∞`. -/
theorem tendsto_log_atTop : Tendsto log atTop atTop :=
tendsto_comp_exp_atTop.1 <| by simpa only [log_exp] using tendsto_id
lemma tendsto_log_nhdsGT_zero : Tendsto log (𝓝[>] 0) atBot := by
simpa [← tendsto_comp_exp_atBot] using tendsto_id
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-18")]
alias tendsto_log_nhdsWithin_zero_right := tendsto_log_nhdsGT_zero
theorem tendsto_log_nhdsNE_zero : Tendsto log (𝓝[≠] 0) atBot := by
simpa [comp_def] using tendsto_log_nhdsGT_zero.comp tendsto_abs_nhdsNE_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-18")]
alias tendsto_log_nhdsWithin_zero := tendsto_log_nhdsNE_zero
lemma tendsto_log_nhdsLT_zero : Tendsto log (𝓝[<] 0) atBot :=
tendsto_log_nhdsNE_zero.mono_left <| nhdsWithin_mono _ fun _ h ↦ ne_of_lt h
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-18")]
alias tendsto_log_nhdsWithin_zero_left := tendsto_log_nhdsLT_zero
theorem continuousOn_log : ContinuousOn log {0}ᶜ := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp only [continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict,
restrict]
conv in log _ => rw [log_of_ne_zero (show (x : ℝ) ≠ 0 from x.2)]
exact expOrderIso.symm.continuous.comp (continuous_subtype_val.norm.subtype_mk _)
/-- The real logarithm is continuous as a function from nonzero reals. -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuous_log : Continuous fun x : { x : ℝ // x ≠ 0 } => log x :=
continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict.1 <| continuousOn_log.mono fun _ => id
/-- The real logarithm is continuous as a function from positive reals. -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuous_log' : Continuous fun x : { x : ℝ // 0 < x } => log x :=
continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict.1 <| continuousOn_log.mono fun _ hx => ne_of_gt hx
theorem continuousAt_log (hx : x ≠ 0) : ContinuousAt log x :=
(continuousOn_log x hx).continuousAt <| isOpen_compl_singleton.mem_nhds hx
@[simp]
theorem continuousAt_log_iff : ContinuousAt log x ↔ x ≠ 0 := by
refine ⟨?_, continuousAt_log⟩
rintro h rfl
exact not_tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_atBot tendsto_log_nhdsNE_zero _ <|
h.tendsto.mono_left nhdsWithin_le_nhds
theorem log_prod {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ) (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0) :
log (∏ i ∈ s, f i) = ∑ i ∈ s, log (f i) := by
induction' s using Finset.cons_induction_on with a s ha ih
· simp
· rw [Finset.forall_mem_cons] at hf
simp [ih hf.2, log_mul hf.1 (Finset.prod_ne_zero_iff.2 hf.2)]
protected theorem _root_.Finsupp.log_prod {α β : Type*} [Zero β] (f : α →₀ β) (g : α → β → ℝ)
(hg : ∀ a, g a (f a) = 0 → f a = 0) : log (f.prod g) = f.sum fun a b ↦ log (g a b) :=
log_prod _ _ fun _x hx h₀ ↦ Finsupp.mem_support_iff.1 hx <| hg _ h₀
theorem log_nat_eq_sum_factorization (n : ℕ) :
log n = n.factorization.sum fun p t => t * log p := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp -- relies on junk values of `log` and `Nat.factorization`
· simp only [← log_pow, ← Nat.cast_pow]
rw [← Finsupp.log_prod, ← Nat.cast_finsuppProd, Nat.factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hn]
intro p hp
rw [pow_eq_zero (Nat.cast_eq_zero.1 hp), Nat.factorization_zero_right]
theorem tendsto_pow_log_div_mul_add_atTop (a b : ℝ) (n : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
Tendsto (fun x => log x ^ n / (a * x + b)) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
((tendsto_div_pow_mul_exp_add_atTop a b n ha.symm).comp tendsto_log_atTop).congr' <| by
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop (0 : ℝ)] with x hx using by simp [exp_log hx]
theorem isLittleO_pow_log_id_atTop {n : ℕ} : (fun x => log x ^ n) =o[atTop] id := by
rw [Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff_tendsto']
· simpa using tendsto_pow_log_div_mul_add_atTop 1 0 n one_ne_zero
filter_upwards [eventually_ne_atTop (0 : ℝ)] with x h₁ h₂ using (h₁ h₂).elim
theorem isLittleO_log_id_atTop : log =o[atTop] id :=
isLittleO_pow_log_id_atTop.congr_left fun _ => pow_one _
theorem isLittleO_const_log_atTop {c : ℝ} : (fun _ => c) =o[atTop] log := by
refine Asymptotics.isLittleO_of_tendsto' ?_
<| Tendsto.div_atTop (a := c) (by simp) tendsto_log_atTop
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 1] with x hx
aesop (add safe forward log_pos)
|
/-- `Real.exp` as a `PartialHomeomorph` with `source = univ` and `target = {z | 0 < z}`. -/
@[simps] noncomputable def expPartialHomeomorph : PartialHomeomorph ℝ ℝ where
toFun := Real.exp
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Log/Basic.lean | 407 | 410 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Computability.Primrec
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PSub
import Mathlib.Data.PFun
/-!
# The partial recursive functions
The partial recursive functions are defined similarly to the primitive
recursive functions, but now all functions are partial, implemented
using the `Part` monad, and there is an additional operation, called
μ-recursion, which performs unbounded minimization: `μ f` returns the
least natural number `n` for which `f n = 0`, or diverges if such `n` doesn't exist.
## Main definitions
- `Nat.Partrec f`: `f` is partial recursive, for functions `f : ℕ →. ℕ`
- `Partrec f`: `f` is partial recursive, for partial functions between `Primcodable` types
- `Computable f`: `f` is partial recursive, for total functions between `Primcodable` types
## References
* [Mario Carneiro, *Formalizing computability theory via partial recursive functions*][carneiro2019]
-/
open List (Vector)
open Encodable Denumerable Part
attribute [-simp] not_forall
namespace Nat
section Rfind
variable (p : ℕ →. Bool)
private def lbp (m n : ℕ) : Prop :=
m = n + 1 ∧ ∀ k ≤ n, false ∈ p k
private def wf_lbp (H : ∃ n, true ∈ p n ∧ ∀ k < n, (p k).Dom) : WellFounded (lbp p) :=
⟨by
let ⟨n, pn⟩ := H
suffices ∀ m k, n ≤ k + m → Acc (lbp p) k by exact fun a => this _ _ (Nat.le_add_left _ _)
intro m k kn
induction' m with m IH generalizing k <;> refine ⟨_, fun y r => ?_⟩ <;> rcases r with ⟨rfl, a⟩
· injection mem_unique pn.1 (a _ kn)
· exact IH _ (by rw [Nat.add_right_comm]; exact kn)⟩
variable (H : ∃ n, true ∈ p n ∧ ∀ k < n, (p k).Dom)
/-- Find the smallest `n` satisfying `p n`, where all `p k` for `k < n` are defined as false.
Returns a subtype. -/
def rfindX : { n // true ∈ p n ∧ ∀ m < n, false ∈ p m } :=
suffices ∀ k, (∀ n < k, false ∈ p n) → { n // true ∈ p n ∧ ∀ m < n, false ∈ p m } from
this 0 fun _ => (Nat.not_lt_zero _).elim
@WellFounded.fix _ _ (lbp p) (wf_lbp p H)
(by
intro m IH al
have pm : (p m).Dom := by
rcases H with ⟨n, h₁, h₂⟩
rcases lt_trichotomy m n with (h₃ | h₃ | h₃)
· exact h₂ _ h₃
· rw [h₃]
exact h₁.fst
· injection mem_unique h₁ (al _ h₃)
cases e : (p m).get pm
· suffices ∀ᵉ k ≤ m, false ∈ p k from IH _ ⟨rfl, this⟩ fun n h => this _ (le_of_lt_succ h)
intro n h
rcases h.lt_or_eq_dec with h | h
· exact al _ h
· rw [h]
exact ⟨_, e⟩
· exact ⟨m, ⟨_, e⟩, al⟩)
end Rfind
/-- Find the smallest `n` satisfying `p n`, where all `p k` for `k < n` are defined as false.
Returns a `Part`. -/
def rfind (p : ℕ →. Bool) : Part ℕ :=
⟨_, fun h => (rfindX p h).1⟩
theorem rfind_spec {p : ℕ →. Bool} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ rfind p) : true ∈ p n :=
h.snd ▸ (rfindX p h.fst).2.1
theorem rfind_min {p : ℕ →. Bool} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ rfind p) : ∀ {m : ℕ}, m < n → false ∈ p m :=
@(h.snd ▸ @((rfindX p h.fst).2.2))
@[simp]
theorem rfind_dom {p : ℕ →. Bool} :
(rfind p).Dom ↔ ∃ n, true ∈ p n ∧ ∀ {m : ℕ}, m < n → (p m).Dom :=
Iff.rfl
theorem rfind_dom' {p : ℕ →. Bool} :
(rfind p).Dom ↔ ∃ n, true ∈ p n ∧ ∀ {m : ℕ}, m ≤ n → (p m).Dom :=
exists_congr fun _ =>
and_congr_right fun pn =>
⟨fun H _ h => (Decidable.eq_or_lt_of_le h).elim (fun e => e.symm ▸ pn.fst) (H _), fun H _ h =>
H (le_of_lt h)⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_rfind {p : ℕ →. Bool} {n : ℕ} :
n ∈ rfind p ↔ true ∈ p n ∧ ∀ {m : ℕ}, m < n → false ∈ p m :=
⟨fun h => ⟨rfind_spec h, @rfind_min _ _ h⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => by
let ⟨m, hm⟩ := dom_iff_mem.1 <| (@rfind_dom p).2 ⟨_, h₁, fun {m} mn => (h₂ mn).fst⟩
rcases lt_trichotomy m n with (h | h | h)
· injection mem_unique (h₂ h) (rfind_spec hm)
· rwa [← h]
· injection mem_unique h₁ (rfind_min hm h)⟩
theorem rfind_min' {p : ℕ → Bool} {m : ℕ} (pm : p m) : ∃ n ∈ rfind p, n ≤ m :=
have : true ∈ (p : ℕ →. Bool) m := ⟨trivial, pm⟩
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := dom_iff_mem.1 <| (@rfind_dom p).2 ⟨m, this, fun {_} _ => ⟨⟩⟩
⟨n, hn, not_lt.1 fun h => by injection mem_unique this (rfind_min hn h)⟩
theorem rfind_zero_none (p : ℕ →. Bool) (p0 : p 0 = Part.none) : rfind p = Part.none :=
eq_none_iff.2 fun _ h =>
let ⟨_, _, h₂⟩ := rfind_dom'.1 h.fst
(p0 ▸ h₂ (zero_le _) : (@Part.none Bool).Dom)
/-- Find the smallest `n` satisfying `f n`, where all `f k` for `k < n` are defined as false.
Returns a `Part`. -/
def rfindOpt {α} (f : ℕ → Option α) : Part α :=
(rfind fun n => (f n).isSome).bind fun n => f n
theorem rfindOpt_spec {α} {f : ℕ → Option α} {a} (h : a ∈ rfindOpt f) : ∃ n, a ∈ f n :=
let ⟨n, _, h₂⟩ := mem_bind_iff.1 h
⟨n, mem_coe.1 h₂⟩
theorem rfindOpt_dom {α} {f : ℕ → Option α} : (rfindOpt f).Dom ↔ ∃ n a, a ∈ f n :=
⟨fun h => (rfindOpt_spec ⟨h, rfl⟩).imp fun _ h => ⟨_, h⟩, fun h => by
have h' : ∃ n, (f n).isSome := h.imp fun n => Option.isSome_iff_exists.2
have s := Nat.find_spec h'
have fd : (rfind fun n => (f n).isSome).Dom :=
⟨Nat.find h', by simpa using s.symm, fun _ _ => trivial⟩
refine ⟨fd, ?_⟩
have := rfind_spec (get_mem fd)
simpa using this⟩
theorem rfindOpt_mono {α} {f : ℕ → Option α} (H : ∀ {a m n}, m ≤ n → a ∈ f m → a ∈ f n) {a} :
a ∈ rfindOpt f ↔ ∃ n, a ∈ f n :=
⟨rfindOpt_spec, fun ⟨n, h⟩ => by
have h' := rfindOpt_dom.2 ⟨_, _, h⟩
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := rfindOpt_spec ⟨h', rfl⟩
have := (H (le_max_left _ _) h).symm.trans (H (le_max_right _ _) hk)
simp at this; simp [this, get_mem]⟩
/-- `Partrec f` means that the partial function `f : ℕ → ℕ` is partially recursive. -/
inductive Partrec : (ℕ →. ℕ) → Prop
| zero : Partrec (pure 0)
| succ : Partrec succ
| left : Partrec ↑fun n : ℕ => n.unpair.1
| right : Partrec ↑fun n : ℕ => n.unpair.2
| pair {f g} : Partrec f → Partrec g → Partrec fun n => pair <$> f n <*> g n
| comp {f g} : Partrec f → Partrec g → Partrec fun n => g n >>= f
| prec {f g} : Partrec f → Partrec g → Partrec (unpaired fun a n =>
n.rec (f a) fun y IH => do let i ← IH; g (pair a (pair y i)))
| rfind {f} : Partrec f → Partrec fun a => rfind fun n => (fun m => m = 0) <$> f (pair a n)
namespace Partrec
theorem of_eq {f g : ℕ →. ℕ} (hf : Partrec f) (H : ∀ n, f n = g n) : Partrec g :=
(funext H : f = g) ▸ hf
theorem of_eq_tot {f : ℕ →. ℕ} {g : ℕ → ℕ} (hf : Partrec f) (H : ∀ n, g n ∈ f n) : Partrec g :=
hf.of_eq fun n => eq_some_iff.2 (H n)
theorem of_primrec {f : ℕ → ℕ} (hf : Nat.Primrec f) : Partrec f := by
induction hf with
| zero => exact zero
| succ => exact succ
| left => exact left
| right => exact right
| pair _ _ pf pg =>
refine (pf.pair pg).of_eq_tot fun n => ?_
simp [Seq.seq]
| comp _ _ pf pg =>
refine (pf.comp pg).of_eq_tot fun n => (by simp)
| prec _ _ pf pg =>
refine (pf.prec pg).of_eq_tot fun n => ?_
simp only [unpaired, PFun.coe_val, bind_eq_bind]
induction n.unpair.2 with
| zero => simp
| succ m IH =>
simp only [mem_bind_iff, mem_some_iff]
exact ⟨_, IH, rfl⟩
protected theorem some : Partrec some :=
of_primrec Primrec.id
theorem none : Partrec fun _ => none :=
(of_primrec (Nat.Primrec.const 1)).rfind.of_eq fun _ =>
eq_none_iff.2 fun _ ⟨h, _⟩ => by simp at h
theorem prec' {f g h} (hf : Partrec f) (hg : Partrec g) (hh : Partrec h) :
Partrec fun a => (f a).bind fun n => n.rec (g a)
fun y IH => do {let i ← IH; h (Nat.pair a (Nat.pair y i))} :=
((prec hg hh).comp (pair Partrec.some hf)).of_eq fun a =>
ext fun s => by simp [Seq.seq]
theorem ppred : Partrec fun n => ppred n :=
have : Primrec₂ fun n m => if n = Nat.succ m then 0 else 1 :=
(Primrec.ite
(@PrimrecRel.comp _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Primrec.eq Primrec.fst (_root_.Primrec.succ.comp Primrec.snd))
(_root_.Primrec.const 0) (_root_.Primrec.const 1)).to₂
(of_primrec (Primrec₂.unpaired'.2 this)).rfind.of_eq fun n => by
cases n <;> simp
· exact
eq_none_iff.2 fun a ⟨⟨m, h, _⟩, _⟩ => by
simp [show 0 ≠ m.succ by intro h; injection h] at h
· refine eq_some_iff.2 ?_
simp only [mem_rfind, not_true, IsEmpty.forall_iff, decide_true, mem_some_iff,
false_eq_decide_iff, true_and]
intro m h
simp [ne_of_gt h]
end Partrec
end Nat
/-- Partially recursive partial functions `α → σ` between `Primcodable` types -/
def Partrec {α σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable σ] (f : α →. σ) :=
Nat.Partrec fun n => Part.bind (decode (α := α) n) fun a => (f a).map encode
/-- Partially recursive partial functions `α → β → σ` between `Primcodable` types -/
def Partrec₂ {α β σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ] (f : α → β →. σ) :=
Partrec fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2
/-- Computable functions `α → σ` between `Primcodable` types:
a function is computable if and only if it is partially recursive (as a partial function) -/
def Computable {α σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable σ] (f : α → σ) :=
Partrec (f : α →. σ)
/-- Computable functions `α → β → σ` between `Primcodable` types -/
def Computable₂ {α β σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ] (f : α → β → σ) :=
Computable fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2
theorem Primrec.to_comp {α σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable σ] {f : α → σ} (hf : Primrec f) :
Computable f :=
(Nat.Partrec.ppred.comp (Nat.Partrec.of_primrec hf)).of_eq fun n => by
simp; cases decode (α := α) n <;> simp
nonrec theorem Primrec₂.to_comp {α β σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ]
{f : α → β → σ} (hf : Primrec₂ f) : Computable₂ f :=
hf.to_comp
protected theorem Computable.partrec {α σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable σ] {f : α → σ}
(hf : Computable f) : Partrec (f : α →. σ) :=
hf
protected theorem Computable₂.partrec₂ {α β σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ]
{f : α → β → σ} (hf : Computable₂ f) : Partrec₂ fun a => (f a : β →. σ) :=
hf
namespace Computable
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable γ] [Primcodable σ]
theorem of_eq {f g : α → σ} (hf : Computable f) (H : ∀ n, f n = g n) : Computable g :=
(funext H : f = g) ▸ hf
theorem const (s : σ) : Computable fun _ : α => s :=
(Primrec.const _).to_comp
theorem ofOption {f : α → Option β} (hf : Computable f) : Partrec fun a => (f a : Part β) :=
(Nat.Partrec.ppred.comp hf).of_eq fun n => by
rcases decode (α := α) n with - | a <;> simp
rcases f a with - | b <;> simp
theorem to₂ {f : α × β → σ} (hf : Computable f) : Computable₂ fun a b => f (a, b) :=
hf.of_eq fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
protected theorem id : Computable (@id α) :=
Primrec.id.to_comp
theorem fst : Computable (@Prod.fst α β) :=
Primrec.fst.to_comp
theorem snd : Computable (@Prod.snd α β) :=
Primrec.snd.to_comp
nonrec theorem pair {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (hf : Computable f) (hg : Computable g) :
Computable fun a => (f a, g a) :=
(hf.pair hg).of_eq fun n => by cases decode (α := α) n <;> simp [Seq.seq]
theorem unpair : Computable Nat.unpair :=
Primrec.unpair.to_comp
theorem succ : Computable Nat.succ :=
Primrec.succ.to_comp
theorem pred : Computable Nat.pred :=
Primrec.pred.to_comp
theorem nat_bodd : Computable Nat.bodd :=
Primrec.nat_bodd.to_comp
theorem nat_div2 : Computable Nat.div2 :=
Primrec.nat_div2.to_comp
theorem sumInl : Computable (@Sum.inl α β) :=
Primrec.sumInl.to_comp
theorem sumInr : Computable (@Sum.inr α β) :=
Primrec.sumInr.to_comp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")] alias sum_inl := Computable.sumInl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")] alias sum_inr := Computable.sumInr
theorem list_cons : Computable₂ (@List.cons α) :=
Primrec.list_cons.to_comp
theorem list_reverse : Computable (@List.reverse α) :=
Primrec.list_reverse.to_comp
theorem list_getElem? : Computable₂ ((·[·]? : List α → ℕ → Option α)) :=
Primrec.list_getElem?.to_comp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-14")] alias list_get? := list_getElem?
theorem list_append : Computable₂ ((· ++ ·) : List α → List α → List α) :=
Primrec.list_append.to_comp
theorem list_concat : Computable₂ fun l (a : α) => l ++ [a] :=
Primrec.list_concat.to_comp
theorem list_length : Computable (@List.length α) :=
Primrec.list_length.to_comp
theorem vector_cons {n} : Computable₂ (@List.Vector.cons α n) :=
Primrec.vector_cons.to_comp
theorem vector_toList {n} : Computable (@List.Vector.toList α n) :=
Primrec.vector_toList.to_comp
theorem vector_length {n} : Computable (@List.Vector.length α n) :=
Primrec.vector_length.to_comp
theorem vector_head {n} : Computable (@List.Vector.head α n) :=
Primrec.vector_head.to_comp
theorem vector_tail {n} : Computable (@List.Vector.tail α n) :=
Primrec.vector_tail.to_comp
theorem vector_get {n} : Computable₂ (@List.Vector.get α n) :=
Primrec.vector_get.to_comp
theorem vector_ofFn' {n} : Computable (@List.Vector.ofFn α n) :=
Primrec.vector_ofFn'.to_comp
theorem fin_app {n} : Computable₂ (@id (Fin n → σ)) :=
Primrec.fin_app.to_comp
protected theorem encode : Computable (@encode α _) :=
Primrec.encode.to_comp
protected theorem decode : Computable (decode (α := α)) :=
Primrec.decode.to_comp
protected theorem ofNat (α) [Denumerable α] : Computable (ofNat α) :=
(Primrec.ofNat _).to_comp
theorem encode_iff {f : α → σ} : (Computable fun a => encode (f a)) ↔ Computable f :=
Iff.rfl
theorem option_some : Computable (@Option.some α) :=
Primrec.option_some.to_comp
end Computable
namespace Partrec
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {σ : Type*} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable σ]
open Computable
theorem of_eq {f g : α →. σ} (hf : Partrec f) (H : ∀ n, f n = g n) : Partrec g :=
(funext H : f = g) ▸ hf
theorem of_eq_tot {f : α →. σ} {g : α → σ} (hf : Partrec f) (H : ∀ n, g n ∈ f n) : Computable g :=
hf.of_eq fun a => eq_some_iff.2 (H a)
theorem none : Partrec fun _ : α => @Part.none σ :=
Nat.Partrec.none.of_eq fun n => by cases decode (α := α) n <;> simp
protected theorem some : Partrec (@Part.some α) :=
Computable.id
theorem _root_.Decidable.Partrec.const' (s : Part σ) [Decidable s.Dom] : Partrec fun _ : α => s :=
(Computable.ofOption (const (toOption s))).of_eq fun _ => of_toOption s
theorem const' (s : Part σ) : Partrec fun _ : α => s :=
haveI := Classical.dec s.Dom
Decidable.Partrec.const' s
protected theorem bind {f : α →. β} {g : α → β →. σ} (hf : Partrec f) (hg : Partrec₂ g) :
Partrec fun a => (f a).bind (g a) :=
(hg.comp (Nat.Partrec.some.pair hf)).of_eq fun n => by
simp [Seq.seq]; rcases e : decode (α := α) n with - | a <;> simp [e, encodek]
theorem map {f : α →. β} {g : α → β → σ} (hf : Partrec f) (hg : Computable₂ g) :
Partrec fun a => (f a).map (g a) := by
simpa [bind_some_eq_map] using Partrec.bind (g := fun a x => some (g a x)) hf hg
theorem to₂ {f : α × β →. σ} (hf : Partrec f) : Partrec₂ fun a b => f (a, b) :=
hf.of_eq fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
theorem nat_rec {f : α → ℕ} {g : α →. σ} {h : α → ℕ × σ →. σ} (hf : Computable f) (hg : Partrec g)
(hh : Partrec₂ h) : Partrec fun a => (f a).rec (g a) fun y IH => IH.bind fun i => h a (y, i) :=
(Nat.Partrec.prec' hf hg hh).of_eq fun n => by
rcases e : decode (α := α) n with - | a <;> simp [e]
induction' f a with m IH <;> simp
rw [IH, Part.bind_map]
congr; funext s
simp [encodek]
nonrec theorem comp {f : β →. σ} {g : α → β} (hf : Partrec f) (hg : Computable g) :
Partrec fun a => f (g a) :=
(hf.comp hg).of_eq fun n => by simp; rcases e : decode (α := α) n with - | a <;> simp [e, encodek]
theorem nat_iff {f : ℕ →. ℕ} : Partrec f ↔ Nat.Partrec f := by simp [Partrec, map_id']
theorem map_encode_iff {f : α →. σ} : (Partrec fun a => (f a).map encode) ↔ Partrec f :=
Iff.rfl
end Partrec
namespace Partrec₂
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable γ] [Primcodable δ] [Primcodable σ]
theorem unpaired {f : ℕ → ℕ →. α} : Partrec (Nat.unpaired f) ↔ Partrec₂ f :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using Partrec.comp (g := fun p : ℕ × ℕ => (p.1, p.2)) h Primrec₂.pair.to_comp,
fun h => h.comp Primrec.unpair.to_comp⟩
theorem unpaired' {f : ℕ → ℕ →. ℕ} : Nat.Partrec (Nat.unpaired f) ↔ Partrec₂ f :=
Partrec.nat_iff.symm.trans unpaired
nonrec theorem comp {f : β → γ →. σ} {g : α → β} {h : α → γ} (hf : Partrec₂ f) (hg : Computable g)
(hh : Computable h) : Partrec fun a => f (g a) (h a) :=
hf.comp (hg.pair hh)
theorem comp₂ {f : γ → δ →. σ} {g : α → β → γ} {h : α → β → δ} (hf : Partrec₂ f)
(hg : Computable₂ g) (hh : Computable₂ h) : Partrec₂ fun a b => f (g a b) (h a b) :=
hf.comp hg hh
end Partrec₂
namespace Computable
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable γ] [Primcodable σ]
nonrec theorem comp {f : β → σ} {g : α → β} (hf : Computable f) (hg : Computable g) :
Computable fun a => f (g a) :=
hf.comp hg
theorem comp₂ {f : γ → σ} {g : α → β → γ} (hf : Computable f) (hg : Computable₂ g) :
Computable₂ fun a b => f (g a b) :=
hf.comp hg
end Computable
namespace Computable₂
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable γ] [Primcodable δ] [Primcodable σ]
theorem mk {f : α → β → σ} (hf : Computable fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2) : Computable₂ f := hf
nonrec theorem comp {f : β → γ → σ} {g : α → β} {h : α → γ} (hf : Computable₂ f)
(hg : Computable g) (hh : Computable h) : Computable fun a => f (g a) (h a) :=
hf.comp (hg.pair hh)
theorem comp₂ {f : γ → δ → σ} {g : α → β → γ} {h : α → β → δ} (hf : Computable₂ f)
(hg : Computable₂ g) (hh : Computable₂ h) : Computable₂ fun a b => f (g a b) (h a b) :=
hf.comp hg hh
end Computable₂
namespace Partrec
variable {α : Type*} {σ : Type*} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable σ]
open Computable
theorem rfind {p : α → ℕ →. Bool} (hp : Partrec₂ p) : Partrec fun a => Nat.rfind (p a) :=
(Nat.Partrec.rfind <|
hp.map ((Primrec.dom_bool fun b => cond b 0 1).comp Primrec.snd).to₂.to_comp).of_eq
fun n => by
rcases e : decode (α := α) n with - | a <;> simp [e, Nat.rfind_zero_none, map_id']
congr; funext n
simp only [map_map, Function.comp]
refine map_id' (fun b => ?_) _
cases b <;> rfl
theorem rfindOpt {f : α → ℕ → Option σ} (hf : Computable₂ f) :
Partrec fun a => Nat.rfindOpt (f a) :=
(rfind (Primrec.option_isSome.to_comp.comp hf).partrec.to₂).bind (ofOption hf)
theorem nat_casesOn_right {f : α → ℕ} {g : α → σ} {h : α → ℕ →. σ} (hf : Computable f)
(hg : Computable g) (hh : Partrec₂ h) : Partrec fun a => (f a).casesOn (some (g a)) (h a) :=
(nat_rec hf hg (hh.comp fst (pred.comp <| hf.comp fst)).to₂).of_eq fun a => by
simp only [PFun.coe_val, Nat.pred_eq_sub_one]; rcases f a with - | n <;> simp
refine ext fun b => ⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => ?_⟩
· rcases mem_bind_iff.1 H with ⟨c, _, h₂⟩
exact h₂
· have : ∀ m, (Nat.rec (motive := fun _ => Part σ)
(Part.some (g a)) (fun y IH => IH.bind fun _ => h a n) m).Dom := by
intro m
induction m <;> simp [*, H.fst]
exact ⟨⟨this n, H.fst⟩, H.snd⟩
theorem bind_decode₂_iff {f : α →. σ} :
Partrec f ↔ Nat.Partrec fun n => Part.bind (decode₂ α n) fun a => (f a).map encode :=
⟨fun hf =>
nat_iff.1 <|
(Computable.ofOption Primrec.decode₂.to_comp).bind <|
(map hf (Computable.encode.comp snd).to₂).comp snd,
fun h =>
map_encode_iff.1 <| by simpa [encodek₂] using (nat_iff.2 h).comp (@Computable.encode α _)⟩
theorem vector_mOfFn :
∀ {n} {f : Fin n → α →. σ},
(∀ i, Partrec (f i)) → Partrec fun a : α => Vector.mOfFn fun i => f i a
| 0, _, _ => const _
| n + 1, f, hf => by
simp only [Vector.mOfFn, Nat.add_eq, Nat.add_zero, pure_eq_some, bind_eq_bind]
exact
(hf 0).bind
(Partrec.bind ((vector_mOfFn fun i => hf i.succ).comp fst)
(Primrec.vector_cons.to_comp.comp (snd.comp fst) snd))
end Partrec
@[simp]
theorem Vector.mOfFn_part_some {α n} :
∀ f : Fin n → α,
(List.Vector.mOfFn fun i => Part.some (f i)) = Part.some (List.Vector.ofFn f) :=
Vector.mOfFn_pure
namespace Computable
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {σ : Type*}
variable [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable γ] [Primcodable σ]
theorem option_some_iff {f : α → σ} : (Computable fun a => Option.some (f a)) ↔ Computable f :=
⟨fun h => encode_iff.1 <| Primrec.pred.to_comp.comp <| encode_iff.2 h, option_some.comp⟩
theorem bind_decode_iff {f : α → β → Option σ} :
(Computable₂ fun a n => (decode (α := β) n).bind (f a)) ↔ Computable₂ f :=
⟨fun hf =>
Nat.Partrec.of_eq
(((Partrec.nat_iff.2
(Nat.Partrec.ppred.comp <| Nat.Partrec.of_primrec <| Primcodable.prim (α := β))).comp
snd).bind
(Computable.comp hf fst).to₂.partrec₂)
fun n => by
simp only [decode_prod_val, decode_nat, Option.map_some', PFun.coe_val, bind_eq_bind,
bind_some, Part.map_bind, map_some]
cases decode (α := α) n.unpair.1 <;> simp
cases decode (α := β) n.unpair.2 <;> simp,
fun hf => by
have :
Partrec fun a : α × ℕ =>
(encode (decode (α := β) a.2)).casesOn (some Option.none)
fun n => Part.map (f a.1) (decode (α := β) n) :=
Partrec.nat_casesOn_right
(h := fun (a : α × ℕ) (n : ℕ) ↦ map (fun b ↦ f a.1 b) (Part.ofOption (decode n)))
(Primrec.encdec.to_comp.comp snd) (const Option.none)
((ofOption (Computable.decode.comp snd)).map (hf.comp (fst.comp <| fst.comp fst) snd).to₂)
refine this.of_eq fun a => ?_
simp; cases decode (α := β) a.2 <;> simp [encodek]⟩
theorem map_decode_iff {f : α → β → σ} :
(Computable₂ fun a n => (decode (α := β) n).map (f a)) ↔ Computable₂ f := by
convert (bind_decode_iff (f := fun a => Option.some ∘ f a)).trans option_some_iff
apply Option.map_eq_bind
theorem nat_rec {f : α → ℕ} {g : α → σ} {h : α → ℕ × σ → σ} (hf : Computable f) (hg : Computable g)
(hh : Computable₂ h) :
Computable fun a => Nat.rec (motive := fun _ => σ) (g a) (fun y IH => h a (y, IH)) (f a) :=
(Partrec.nat_rec hf hg hh.partrec₂).of_eq fun a => by simp; induction f a <;> simp [*]
theorem nat_casesOn {f : α → ℕ} {g : α → σ} {h : α → ℕ → σ} (hf : Computable f) (hg : Computable g)
(hh : Computable₂ h) :
Computable fun a => Nat.casesOn (motive := fun _ => σ) (f a) (g a) (h a) :=
nat_rec hf hg (hh.comp fst <| fst.comp snd).to₂
theorem cond {c : α → Bool} {f : α → σ} {g : α → σ} (hc : Computable c) (hf : Computable f)
(hg : Computable g) : Computable fun a => cond (c a) (f a) (g a) :=
(nat_casesOn (encode_iff.2 hc) hg (hf.comp fst).to₂).of_eq fun a => by cases c a <;> rfl
theorem option_casesOn {o : α → Option β} {f : α → σ} {g : α → β → σ} (ho : Computable o)
(hf : Computable f) (hg : Computable₂ g) :
@Computable _ σ _ _ fun a => Option.casesOn (o a) (f a) (g a) :=
option_some_iff.1 <|
(nat_casesOn (encode_iff.2 ho) (option_some_iff.2 hf) (map_decode_iff.2 hg)).of_eq fun a => by
cases o a <;> simp [encodek]
theorem option_bind {f : α → Option β} {g : α → β → Option σ} (hf : Computable f)
(hg : Computable₂ g) : Computable fun a => (f a).bind (g a) :=
(option_casesOn hf (const Option.none) hg).of_eq fun a => by cases f a <;> rfl
theorem option_map {f : α → Option β} {g : α → β → σ} (hf : Computable f) (hg : Computable₂ g) :
Computable fun a => (f a).map (g a) := by
convert option_bind hf (option_some.comp₂ hg)
apply Option.map_eq_bind
theorem option_getD {f : α → Option β} {g : α → β} (hf : Computable f) (hg : Computable g) :
Computable fun a => (f a).getD (g a) :=
(Computable.option_casesOn hf hg (show Computable₂ fun _ b => b from Computable.snd)).of_eq
fun a => by cases f a <;> rfl
theorem subtype_mk {f : α → β} {p : β → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {h : ∀ a, p (f a)}
(hp : PrimrecPred p) (hf : Computable f) :
@Computable _ _ _ (Primcodable.subtype hp) fun a => (⟨f a, h a⟩ : Subtype p) :=
hf
theorem sumCasesOn {f : α → β ⊕ γ} {g : α → β → σ} {h : α → γ → σ} (hf : Computable f)
(hg : Computable₂ g) (hh : Computable₂ h) :
@Computable _ σ _ _ fun a => Sum.casesOn (f a) (g a) (h a) :=
option_some_iff.1 <|
(cond (nat_bodd.comp <| encode_iff.2 hf)
(option_map (Computable.decode.comp <| nat_div2.comp <| encode_iff.2 hf) hh)
(option_map (Computable.decode.comp <| nat_div2.comp <| encode_iff.2 hf) hg)).of_eq
fun a => by
rcases f a with b | c <;> simp [Nat.div2_val]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")] alias sum_casesOn := sumCasesOn
theorem nat_strong_rec (f : α → ℕ → σ) {g : α → List σ → Option σ} (hg : Computable₂ g)
(H : ∀ a n, g a ((List.range n).map (f a)) = Option.some (f a n)) : Computable₂ f :=
suffices Computable₂ fun a n => (List.range n).map (f a) from
option_some_iff.1 <|
(list_getElem?.comp (this.comp fst (succ.comp snd)) snd).to₂.of_eq fun a => by
simp [List.getElem?_range (Nat.lt_succ_self a.2)]
option_some_iff.1 <|
(nat_rec snd (const (Option.some []))
(to₂ <|
option_bind (snd.comp snd) <|
to₂ <|
option_map (hg.comp (fst.comp <| fst.comp fst) snd)
(to₂ <| list_concat.comp (snd.comp fst) snd))).of_eq
fun a => by
induction' a.2 with n IH; · rfl
simp [IH, H, List.range_succ]
theorem list_ofFn :
∀ {n} {f : Fin n → α → σ},
(∀ i, Computable (f i)) → Computable fun a => List.ofFn fun i => f i a
| | 0, _, _ => by
simp only [List.ofFn_zero]
exact const []
| n + 1, f, hf => by
| Mathlib/Computability/Partrec.lean | 658 | 661 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Archimedean
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Zsqrtd.Basic
/-!
# Gaussian integers
The Gaussian integers are complex integer, complex numbers whose real and imaginary parts are both
integers.
## Main definitions
The Euclidean domain structure on `ℤ[i]` is defined in this file.
The homomorphism `GaussianInt.toComplex` into the complex numbers is also defined in this file.
## See also
See `NumberTheory.Zsqrtd.QuadraticReciprocity` for:
* `prime_iff_mod_four_eq_three_of_nat_prime`:
A prime natural number is prime in `ℤ[i]` if and only if it is `3` mod `4`
## Notations
This file uses the local notation `ℤ[i]` for `GaussianInt`
## Implementation notes
Gaussian integers are implemented using the more general definition `Zsqrtd`, the type of integers
adjoined a square root of `d`, in this case `-1`. The definition is reducible, so that properties
and definitions about `Zsqrtd` can easily be used.
-/
open Zsqrtd Complex
open scoped ComplexConjugate
/-- The Gaussian integers, defined as `ℤ√(-1)`. -/
abbrev GaussianInt : Type :=
Zsqrtd (-1)
local notation "ℤ[i]" => GaussianInt
namespace GaussianInt
instance : Repr ℤ[i] :=
⟨fun x _ => "⟨" ++ repr x.re ++ ", " ++ repr x.im ++ "⟩"⟩
instance instCommRing : CommRing ℤ[i] :=
Zsqrtd.commRing
section
attribute [-instance] Complex.instField -- Avoid making things noncomputable unnecessarily.
/-- The embedding of the Gaussian integers into the complex numbers, as a ring homomorphism. -/
def toComplex : ℤ[i] →+* ℂ :=
Zsqrtd.lift ⟨I, by simp⟩
end
instance : Coe ℤ[i] ℂ :=
⟨toComplex⟩
theorem toComplex_def (x : ℤ[i]) : (x : ℂ) = x.re + x.im * I :=
rfl
theorem toComplex_def' (x y : ℤ) : ((⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ[i]) : ℂ) = x + y * I := by simp [toComplex_def]
theorem toComplex_def₂ (x : ℤ[i]) : (x : ℂ) = ⟨x.re, x.im⟩ := by
apply Complex.ext <;> simp [toComplex_def]
@[simp]
theorem to_real_re (x : ℤ[i]) : ((x.re : ℤ) : ℝ) = (x : ℂ).re := by simp [toComplex_def]
@[simp]
theorem to_real_im (x : ℤ[i]) : ((x.im : ℤ) : ℝ) = (x : ℂ).im := by simp [toComplex_def]
@[simp]
theorem toComplex_re (x y : ℤ) : ((⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ[i]) : ℂ).re = x := by simp [toComplex_def]
@[simp]
theorem toComplex_im (x y : ℤ) : ((⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ[i]) : ℂ).im = y := by simp [toComplex_def]
theorem toComplex_add (x y : ℤ[i]) : ((x + y : ℤ[i]) : ℂ) = x + y :=
toComplex.map_add _ _
theorem toComplex_mul (x y : ℤ[i]) : ((x * y : ℤ[i]) : ℂ) = x * y :=
toComplex.map_mul _ _
theorem toComplex_one : ((1 : ℤ[i]) : ℂ) = 1 :=
toComplex.map_one
theorem toComplex_zero : ((0 : ℤ[i]) : ℂ) = 0 :=
toComplex.map_zero
theorem toComplex_neg (x : ℤ[i]) : ((-x : ℤ[i]) : ℂ) = -x :=
toComplex.map_neg _
theorem toComplex_sub (x y : ℤ[i]) : ((x - y : ℤ[i]) : ℂ) = x - y :=
toComplex.map_sub _ _
@[simp]
theorem toComplex_star (x : ℤ[i]) : ((star x : ℤ[i]) : ℂ) = conj (x : ℂ) := by
rw [toComplex_def₂, toComplex_def₂]
exact congr_arg₂ _ rfl (Int.cast_neg _)
@[simp]
theorem toComplex_inj {x y : ℤ[i]} : (x : ℂ) = y ↔ x = y := by
cases x; cases y; simp [toComplex_def₂]
lemma toComplex_injective : Function.Injective GaussianInt.toComplex :=
fun ⦃_ _⦄ ↦ toComplex_inj.mp
@[simp]
theorem toComplex_eq_zero {x : ℤ[i]} : (x : ℂ) = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
rw [← toComplex_zero, toComplex_inj]
@[simp]
theorem intCast_real_norm (x : ℤ[i]) : (x.norm : ℝ) = Complex.normSq (x : ℂ) := by
rw [Zsqrtd.norm, normSq]; simp
@[simp]
theorem intCast_complex_norm (x : ℤ[i]) : (x.norm : ℂ) = Complex.normSq (x : ℂ) := by
cases x; rw [Zsqrtd.norm, normSq]; simp
theorem norm_nonneg (x : ℤ[i]) : 0 ≤ norm x :=
Zsqrtd.norm_nonneg (by norm_num) _
@[simp]
theorem norm_eq_zero {x : ℤ[i]} : norm x = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by rw [← @Int.cast_inj ℝ _ _ _]; simp
theorem norm_pos {x : ℤ[i]} : 0 < norm x ↔ x ≠ 0 := by
| rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, Ne, eq_comm, norm_eq_zero]; simp [norm_nonneg]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Zsqrtd/GaussianInt.lean | 141 | 142 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Expect
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Canonical
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Nonneg.Floor
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Data.NNReal.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Group
/-!
# Basic results on nonnegative real numbers
This file contains all results on `NNReal` that do not directly follow from its basic structure.
As a consequence, it is a bit of a random collection of results, and is a good target for cleanup.
## Notations
This file uses `ℝ≥0` as a localized notation for `NNReal`.
-/
assert_not_exists Star
open Function
open scoped BigOperators
namespace NNReal
noncomputable instance : FloorSemiring ℝ≥0 := Nonneg.floorSemiring
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_indicator {α} (s : Set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0) (a : α) :
((s.indicator f a : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = s.indicator (fun x => ↑(f x)) a :=
(toRealHom : ℝ≥0 →+ ℝ).map_indicator _ _ _
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_list_sum (l : List ℝ≥0) : ((l.sum : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (l.map (↑)).sum :=
map_list_sum toRealHom l
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_list_prod (l : List ℝ≥0) : ((l.prod : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (l.map (↑)).prod :=
map_list_prod toRealHom l
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_multiset_sum (s : Multiset ℝ≥0) : ((s.sum : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (s.map (↑)).sum :=
map_multiset_sum toRealHom s
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_multiset_prod (s : Multiset ℝ≥0) : ((s.prod : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (s.map (↑)).prod :=
map_multiset_prod toRealHom s
variable {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → ℝ}
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sum (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) : ∑ i ∈ s, f i = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i : ℝ) :=
map_sum toRealHom _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma coe_expect (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) : 𝔼 i ∈ s, f i = 𝔼 i ∈ s, (f i : ℝ) :=
map_expect toRealHom ..
theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_sum_of_nonneg (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ f i) :
Real.toNNReal (∑ a ∈ s, f a) = ∑ a ∈ s, Real.toNNReal (f a) := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_sum, Real.coe_toNNReal _ (Finset.sum_nonneg hf)]
exact Finset.sum_congr rfl fun x hxs => by rw [Real.coe_toNNReal _ (hf x hxs)]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_prod (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) : ↑(∏ a ∈ s, f a) = ∏ a ∈ s, (f a : ℝ) :=
map_prod toRealHom _ _
theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_prod_of_nonneg (hf : ∀ a, a ∈ s → 0 ≤ f a) :
Real.toNNReal (∏ a ∈ s, f a) = ∏ a ∈ s, Real.toNNReal (f a) := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_prod, Real.coe_toNNReal _ (Finset.prod_nonneg hf)]
exact Finset.prod_congr rfl fun x hxs => by rw [Real.coe_toNNReal _ (hf x hxs)]
theorem le_iInf_add_iInf {ι ι' : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] [Nonempty ι'] {f : ι → ℝ≥0} {g : ι' → ℝ≥0}
{a : ℝ≥0} (h : ∀ i j, a ≤ f i + g j) : a ≤ (⨅ i, f i) + ⨅ j, g j := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.coe_add, coe_iInf, coe_iInf]
exact le_ciInf_add_ciInf h
theorem mul_finset_sup {α} (r : ℝ≥0) (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ≥0) :
r * s.sup f = s.sup fun a => r * f a :=
Finset.comp_sup_eq_sup_comp _ (NNReal.mul_sup r) (mul_zero r)
theorem finset_sup_mul {α} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ≥0) :
s.sup f * r = s.sup fun a => f a * r :=
Finset.comp_sup_eq_sup_comp (· * r) (fun x y => NNReal.sup_mul x y r) (zero_mul r)
theorem finset_sup_div {α} {f : α → ℝ≥0} {s : Finset α} (r : ℝ≥0) :
s.sup f / r = s.sup fun a => f a / r := by simp only [div_eq_inv_mul, mul_finset_sup]
open Real
section Sub
/-!
### Lemmas about subtraction
In this section we provide a few lemmas about subtraction that do not fit well into any other
typeclass. For lemmas about subtraction and addition see lemmas about `OrderedSub` in the file
`Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Sub.Basic`. See also `mul_tsub` and `tsub_mul`.
-/
theorem sub_div (a b c : ℝ≥0) : (a - b) / c = a / c - b / c :=
tsub_div _ _ _
end Sub
section Csupr
open Set
variable {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → ℝ≥0}
theorem iInf_mul (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : iInf f * a = ⨅ i, f i * a := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_mul, coe_iInf, coe_iInf]
exact Real.iInf_mul_of_nonneg (NNReal.coe_nonneg _) _
theorem mul_iInf (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : a * iInf f = ⨅ i, a * f i := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using iInf_mul f a
theorem mul_iSup (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : (a * ⨆ i, f i) = ⨆ i, a * f i := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_mul, NNReal.coe_iSup, NNReal.coe_iSup]
exact Real.mul_iSup_of_nonneg (NNReal.coe_nonneg _) _
theorem iSup_mul (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : (⨆ i, f i) * a = ⨆ i, f i * a := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_iSup]
simp_rw [mul_comm]
theorem iSup_div (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (a : ℝ≥0) : (⨆ i, f i) / a = ⨆ i, f i / a := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, iSup_mul]
theorem mul_iSup_le {a : ℝ≥0} {g : ℝ≥0} {h : ι → ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ j, g * h j ≤ a) : g * iSup h ≤ a := by
rw [mul_iSup]
exact ciSup_le' H
theorem iSup_mul_le {a : ℝ≥0} {g : ι → ℝ≥0} {h : ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ i, g i * h ≤ a) : iSup g * h ≤ a := by
rw [iSup_mul]
exact ciSup_le' H
theorem iSup_mul_iSup_le {a : ℝ≥0} {g h : ι → ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ i j, g i * h j ≤ a) :
iSup g * iSup h ≤ a :=
iSup_mul_le fun _ => mul_iSup_le <| H _
variable [Nonempty ι]
theorem le_mul_iInf {a : ℝ≥0} {g : ℝ≥0} {h : ι → ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ j, a ≤ g * h j) : a ≤ g * iInf h := by
rw [mul_iInf]
exact le_ciInf H
theorem le_iInf_mul {a : ℝ≥0} {g : ι → ℝ≥0} {h : ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ i, a ≤ g i * h) : a ≤ iInf g * h := by
rw [iInf_mul]
exact le_ciInf H
theorem le_iInf_mul_iInf {a : ℝ≥0} {g h : ι → ℝ≥0} (H : ∀ i j, a ≤ g i * h j) :
a ≤ iInf g * iInf h :=
le_iInf_mul fun i => le_mul_iInf <| H i
end Csupr
end NNReal
| Mathlib/Data/NNReal/Basic.lean | 1,099 | 1,101 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Chris Birkbeck. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Birkbeck, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Pi
/-!
# Zero and Bounded at filter
Given a filter `l` we define the notion of a function being `ZeroAtFilter` as well as being
`BoundedAtFilter`. Alongside this we construct the `Submodule`, `AddSubmonoid` of functions
that are `ZeroAtFilter`. Similarly, we construct the `Submodule` and `Subalgebra` of functions
that are `BoundedAtFilter`.
-/
namespace Filter
variable {𝕜 α β : Type*}
open Topology
/-- If `l` is a filter on `α`, then a function `f : α → β` is `ZeroAtFilter l`
if it tends to zero along `l`. -/
def ZeroAtFilter [Zero β] [TopologicalSpace β] (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) : Prop :=
Filter.Tendsto f l (𝓝 0)
theorem zero_zeroAtFilter [Zero β] [TopologicalSpace β] (l : Filter α) :
ZeroAtFilter l (0 : α → β) :=
tendsto_const_nhds
nonrec theorem ZeroAtFilter.add [TopologicalSpace β] [AddZeroClass β] [ContinuousAdd β]
{l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (hf : ZeroAtFilter l f) (hg : ZeroAtFilter l g) :
ZeroAtFilter l (f + g) := by
simpa using hf.add hg
nonrec theorem ZeroAtFilter.neg [TopologicalSpace β] [SubtractionMonoid β] [ContinuousNeg β]
{l : Filter α} {f : α → β} (hf : ZeroAtFilter l f) : ZeroAtFilter l (-f) := by
simpa using hf.neg
theorem ZeroAtFilter.smul [TopologicalSpace β] [Zero β]
[SMulZeroClass 𝕜 β] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → β} (c : 𝕜)
| (hf : ZeroAtFilter l f) : ZeroAtFilter l (c • f) := by simpa using hf.const_smul c
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/ZeroAndBoundedAtFilter.lean | 47 | 48 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Pointwise.Interval
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cardinal
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Continuum
/-!
# The cardinality of the reals
This file shows that the real numbers have cardinality continuum, i.e. `#ℝ = 𝔠`.
We show that `#ℝ ≤ 𝔠` by noting that every real number is determined by a Cauchy-sequence of the
form `ℕ → ℚ`, which has cardinality `𝔠`. To show that `#ℝ ≥ 𝔠` we define an injection from
`{0, 1} ^ ℕ` to `ℝ` with `f ↦ Σ n, f n * (1 / 3) ^ n`.
We conclude that all intervals with distinct endpoints have cardinality continuum.
## Main definitions
* `Cardinal.cantorFunction` is the function that sends `f` in `{0, 1} ^ ℕ` to `ℝ` by
`f ↦ Σ' n, f n * (1 / 3) ^ n`
## Main statements
* `Cardinal.mk_real : #ℝ = 𝔠`: the reals have cardinality continuum.
* `Cardinal.not_countable_real`: the universal set of real numbers is not countable.
We can use this same proof to show that all the other sets in this file are not countable.
* 8 lemmas of the form `mk_Ixy_real` for `x,y ∈ {i,o,c}` state that intervals on the reals
have cardinality continuum.
## Notation
* `𝔠` : notation for `Cardinal.continuum` in locale `Cardinal`, defined in `SetTheory.Continuum`.
## Tags
continuum, cardinality, reals, cardinality of the reals
-/
open Nat Set
open Cardinal
noncomputable section
namespace Cardinal
variable {c : ℝ} {f g : ℕ → Bool} {n : ℕ}
/-- The body of the sum in `cantorFunction`.
`cantorFunctionAux c f n = c ^ n` if `f n = true`;
`cantorFunctionAux c f n = 0` if `f n = false`. -/
def cantorFunctionAux (c : ℝ) (f : ℕ → Bool) (n : ℕ) : ℝ :=
cond (f n) (c ^ n) 0
@[simp]
theorem cantorFunctionAux_true (h : f n = true) : cantorFunctionAux c f n = c ^ n := by
simp [cantorFunctionAux, h]
@[simp]
theorem cantorFunctionAux_false (h : f n = false) : cantorFunctionAux c f n = 0 := by
simp [cantorFunctionAux, h]
theorem cantorFunctionAux_nonneg (h : 0 ≤ c) : 0 ≤ cantorFunctionAux c f n := by
cases h' : f n
· simp [h']
· simpa [h'] using pow_nonneg h _
theorem cantorFunctionAux_eq (h : f n = g n) :
cantorFunctionAux c f n = cantorFunctionAux c g n := by simp [cantorFunctionAux, h]
theorem cantorFunctionAux_zero (f : ℕ → Bool) : cantorFunctionAux c f 0 = cond (f 0) 1 0 := by
cases h : f 0 <;> simp [h]
theorem cantorFunctionAux_succ (f : ℕ → Bool) :
(fun n => cantorFunctionAux c f (n + 1)) = fun n =>
c * cantorFunctionAux c (fun n => f (n + 1)) n := by
ext n
cases h : f (n + 1) <;> simp [h, _root_.pow_succ']
theorem summable_cantor_function (f : ℕ → Bool) (h1 : 0 ≤ c) (h2 : c < 1) :
Summable (cantorFunctionAux c f) := by
apply (summable_geometric_of_lt_one h1 h2).summable_of_eq_zero_or_self
intro n; cases h : f n <;> simp [h]
/-- `cantorFunction c (f : ℕ → Bool)` is `Σ n, f n * c ^ n`, where `true` is interpreted as `1` and
`false` is interpreted as `0`. It is implemented using `cantorFunctionAux`. -/
def cantorFunction (c : ℝ) (f : ℕ → Bool) : ℝ :=
∑' n, cantorFunctionAux c f n
theorem cantorFunction_le (h1 : 0 ≤ c) (h2 : c < 1) (h3 : ∀ n, f n → g n) :
cantorFunction c f ≤ cantorFunction c g := by
apply (summable_cantor_function f h1 h2).tsum_le_tsum _ (summable_cantor_function g h1 h2)
intro n; cases h : f n
· simp [h, cantorFunctionAux_nonneg h1]
replace h3 : g n = true := h3 n h; simp [h, h3]
theorem cantorFunction_succ (f : ℕ → Bool) (h1 : 0 ≤ c) (h2 : c < 1) :
cantorFunction c f = cond (f 0) 1 0 + c * cantorFunction c fun n => f (n + 1) := by
rw [cantorFunction, (summable_cantor_function f h1 h2).tsum_eq_zero_add]
rw [cantorFunctionAux_succ, tsum_mul_left, cantorFunctionAux, pow_zero, cantorFunction]
/-- `cantorFunction c` is strictly increasing with if `0 < c < 1/2`, if we endow `ℕ → Bool` with a
lexicographic order. The lexicographic order doesn't exist for these infinitary products, so we
explicitly write out what it means. -/
theorem increasing_cantorFunction (h1 : 0 < c) (h2 : c < 1 / 2) {n : ℕ} {f g : ℕ → Bool}
(hn : ∀ k < n, f k = g k) (fn : f n = false) (gn : g n = true) :
cantorFunction c f < cantorFunction c g := by
have h3 : c < 1 := by
apply h2.trans
norm_num
induction' n with n ih generalizing f g
· let f_max : ℕ → Bool := fun n => Nat.rec false (fun _ _ => true) n
have hf_max : ∀ n, f n → f_max n := by
intro n hn
cases n
· rw [fn] at hn
contradiction
simp [f_max]
let g_min : ℕ → Bool := fun n => Nat.rec true (fun _ _ => false) n
have hg_min : ∀ n, g_min n → g n := by
intro n hn
cases n
· rw [gn]
simp at hn
apply (cantorFunction_le (le_of_lt h1) h3 hf_max).trans_lt
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ (cantorFunction_le (le_of_lt h1) h3 hg_min)
have : c / (1 - c) < 1 := by
rw [div_lt_one, lt_sub_iff_add_lt]
· convert _root_.add_lt_add h2 h2
norm_num
rwa [sub_pos]
convert this
· rw [cantorFunction_succ _ (le_of_lt h1) h3, div_eq_mul_inv, ←
tsum_geometric_of_lt_one (le_of_lt h1) h3]
apply zero_add
· refine (tsum_eq_single 0 ?_).trans ?_
· intro n hn
cases n
· contradiction
simp [g_min]
· exact cantorFunctionAux_zero _
rw [cantorFunction_succ f (le_of_lt h1) h3, cantorFunction_succ g (le_of_lt h1) h3]
rw [hn 0 <| zero_lt_succ n]
apply add_lt_add_left
rw [mul_lt_mul_left h1]
exact ih (fun k hk => hn _ <| Nat.succ_lt_succ hk) fn gn
/-- `cantorFunction c` is injective if `0 < c < 1/2`. -/
theorem cantorFunction_injective (h1 : 0 < c) (h2 : c < 1 / 2) :
Function.Injective (cantorFunction c) := by
intro f g hfg
classical
contrapose hfg with h
have : ∃ n, f n ≠ g n := Function.ne_iff.mp h
let n := Nat.find this
have hn : ∀ k : ℕ, k < n → f k = g k := by
intro k hk
apply of_not_not
exact Nat.find_min this hk
cases fn : f n
· apply _root_.ne_of_lt
refine increasing_cantorFunction h1 h2 hn fn ?_
apply Bool.eq_true_of_not_eq_false
rw [← fn]
apply Ne.symm
exact Nat.find_spec this
· apply _root_.ne_of_gt
refine increasing_cantorFunction h1 h2 (fun k hk => (hn k hk).symm) ?_ fn
apply Bool.eq_false_of_not_eq_true
rw [← fn]
apply Ne.symm
exact Nat.find_spec this
/-- The cardinality of the reals, as a type. -/
theorem mk_real : #ℝ = 𝔠 := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [Real.equivCauchy.cardinal_eq]
apply mk_quotient_le.trans
apply (mk_subtype_le _).trans_eq
rw [← power_def, mk_nat, mkRat, aleph0_power_aleph0]
· convert mk_le_of_injective (cantorFunction_injective _ _)
· rw [← power_def, mk_bool, mk_nat, two_power_aleph0]
· exact 1 / 3
· norm_num
· norm_num
/-- The cardinality of the reals, as a set. -/
theorem mk_univ_real : #(Set.univ : Set ℝ) = 𝔠 := by rw [mk_univ, mk_real]
/-- **Non-Denumerability of the Continuum**: The reals are not countable. -/
instance : Uncountable ℝ := by
rw [← aleph0_lt_mk_iff, mk_real]
exact aleph0_lt_continuum
theorem not_countable_real : ¬(Set.univ : Set ℝ).Countable :=
not_countable_univ
/-- The cardinality of the interval (a, ∞). -/
theorem mk_Ioi_real (a : ℝ) : #(Ioi a) = 𝔠 := by
refine le_antisymm (mk_real ▸ mk_set_le _) ?_
rw [← not_lt]
intro h
refine _root_.ne_of_lt ?_ mk_univ_real
have hu : Iio a ∪ {a} ∪ Ioi a = Set.univ := by
convert @Iic_union_Ioi ℝ _ _
exact Iio_union_right
rw [← hu]
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (mk_union_le _ _) ?_
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (add_le_add_right (mk_union_le _ _) _) ?_
have h2 : (fun x => a + a - x) '' Ioi a = Iio a := by
convert @image_const_sub_Ioi ℝ _ _ _
simp
rw [← h2]
refine add_lt_of_lt (cantor _).le ?_ h
refine add_lt_of_lt (cantor _).le (mk_image_le.trans_lt h) ?_
rw [mk_singleton]
exact one_lt_aleph0.trans (cantor _)
/-- The cardinality of the interval [a, ∞). -/
theorem mk_Ici_real (a : ℝ) : #(Ici a) = 𝔠 :=
le_antisymm (mk_real ▸ mk_set_le _) (mk_Ioi_real a ▸ mk_le_mk_of_subset Ioi_subset_Ici_self)
/-- The cardinality of the interval (-∞, a). -/
theorem mk_Iio_real (a : ℝ) : #(Iio a) = 𝔠 := by
refine le_antisymm (mk_real ▸ mk_set_le _) ?_
have h2 : (fun x => a + a - x) '' Iio a = Ioi a := by
simp only [image_const_sub_Iio, add_sub_cancel_right]
exact mk_Ioi_real a ▸ h2 ▸ mk_image_le
/-- The cardinality of the interval (-∞, a]. -/
theorem mk_Iic_real (a : ℝ) : #(Iic a) = 𝔠 :=
le_antisymm (mk_real ▸ mk_set_le _) (mk_Iio_real a ▸ mk_le_mk_of_subset Iio_subset_Iic_self)
/-- The cardinality of the interval (a, b). -/
theorem mk_Ioo_real {a b : ℝ} (h : a < b) : #(Ioo a b) = 𝔠 := by
refine le_antisymm (mk_real ▸ mk_set_le _) ?_
have h1 : #((fun x => x - a) '' Ioo a b) ≤ #(Ioo a b) := mk_image_le
refine le_trans ?_ h1
rw [image_sub_const_Ioo, sub_self]
replace h := sub_pos_of_lt h
have h2 : #(Inv.inv '' Ioo 0 (b - a)) ≤ #(Ioo 0 (b - a)) := mk_image_le
refine le_trans ?_ h2
rw [image_inv_eq_inv, inv_Ioo_0_left h, mk_Ioi_real]
/-- The cardinality of the interval [a, b). -/
theorem mk_Ico_real {a b : ℝ} (h : a < b) : #(Ico a b) = 𝔠 :=
le_antisymm (mk_real ▸ mk_set_le _) (mk_Ioo_real h ▸ mk_le_mk_of_subset Ioo_subset_Ico_self)
/-- The cardinality of the interval [a, b]. -/
theorem mk_Icc_real {a b : ℝ} (h : a < b) : #(Icc a b) = 𝔠 :=
le_antisymm (mk_real ▸ mk_set_le _) (mk_Ioo_real h ▸ mk_le_mk_of_subset Ioo_subset_Icc_self)
/-- The cardinality of the interval (a, b]. -/
theorem mk_Ioc_real {a b : ℝ} (h : a < b) : #(Ioc a b) = 𝔠 :=
le_antisymm (mk_real ▸ mk_set_le _) (mk_Ioo_real h ▸ mk_le_mk_of_subset Ioo_subset_Ioc_self)
end Cardinal
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Cardinality.lean | 265 | 273 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Michael Stoll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Stoll, Thomas Zhu, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.QuadraticReciprocity
/-!
# The Jacobi Symbol
We define the Jacobi symbol and prove its main properties.
## Main definitions
We define the Jacobi symbol, `jacobiSym a b`, for integers `a` and natural numbers `b`
as the product over the prime factors `p` of `b` of the Legendre symbols `legendreSym p a`.
This agrees with the mathematical definition when `b` is odd.
The prime factors are obtained via `Nat.factors`. Since `Nat.factors 0 = []`,
this implies in particular that `jacobiSym a 0 = 1` for all `a`.
## Main statements
We prove the main properties of the Jacobi symbol, including the following.
* Multiplicativity in both arguments (`jacobiSym.mul_left`, `jacobiSym.mul_right`)
* The value of the symbol is `1` or `-1` when the arguments are coprime
(`jacobiSym.eq_one_or_neg_one`)
* The symbol vanishes if and only if `b ≠ 0` and the arguments are not coprime
(`jacobiSym.eq_zero_iff_not_coprime`)
* If the symbol has the value `-1`, then `a : ZMod b` is not a square
(`ZMod.nonsquare_of_jacobiSym_eq_neg_one`); the converse holds when `b = p` is a prime
(`ZMod.nonsquare_iff_jacobiSym_eq_neg_one`); in particular, in this case `a` is a
square mod `p` when the symbol has the value `1` (`ZMod.isSquare_of_jacobiSym_eq_one`).
* Quadratic reciprocity (`jacobiSym.quadratic_reciprocity`,
`jacobiSym.quadratic_reciprocity_one_mod_four`,
`jacobiSym.quadratic_reciprocity_three_mod_four`)
* The supplementary laws for `a = -1`, `a = 2`, `a = -2` (`jacobiSym.at_neg_one`,
`jacobiSym.at_two`, `jacobiSym.at_neg_two`)
* The symbol depends on `a` only via its residue class mod `b` (`jacobiSym.mod_left`)
and on `b` only via its residue class mod `4*a` (`jacobiSym.mod_right`)
* A `csimp` rule for `jacobiSym` and `legendreSym` that evaluates `J(a | b)` efficiently by
reducing to the case `0 ≤ a < b` and `a`, `b` odd, and then swaps `a`, `b` and recurses using
quadratic reciprocity.
## Notations
We define the notation `J(a | b)` for `jacobiSym a b`, localized to `NumberTheorySymbols`.
## Tags
Jacobi symbol, quadratic reciprocity
-/
section Jacobi
/-!
### Definition of the Jacobi symbol
We define the Jacobi symbol $\Bigl(\frac{a}{b}\Bigr)$ for integers `a` and natural numbers `b`
as the product of the Legendre symbols $\Bigl(\frac{a}{p}\Bigr)$, where `p` runs through the
prime divisors (with multiplicity) of `b`, as provided by `b.factors`. This agrees with the
Jacobi symbol when `b` is odd and gives less meaningful values when it is not (e.g., the symbol
is `1` when `b = 0`). This is called `jacobiSym a b`.
We define localized notation (locale `NumberTheorySymbols`) `J(a | b)` for the Jacobi
symbol `jacobiSym a b`.
-/
open Nat ZMod
-- Since we need the fact that the factors are prime, we use `List.pmap`.
/-- The Jacobi symbol of `a` and `b` -/
def jacobiSym (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : ℤ :=
(b.primeFactorsList.pmap (fun p pp => @legendreSym p ⟨pp⟩ a) fun _ pf =>
prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList pf).prod
-- Notation for the Jacobi symbol.
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[NumberTheorySymbols] notation "J(" a " | " b ")" => jacobiSym a b
open NumberTheorySymbols
/-!
### Properties of the Jacobi symbol
-/
namespace jacobiSym
/-- The symbol `J(a | 0)` has the value `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem zero_right (a : ℤ) : J(a | 0) = 1 := by
simp only [jacobiSym, primeFactorsList_zero, List.prod_nil, List.pmap]
/-- The symbol `J(a | 1)` has the value `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem one_right (a : ℤ) : J(a | 1) = 1 := by
simp only [jacobiSym, primeFactorsList_one, List.prod_nil, List.pmap]
/-- The Legendre symbol `legendreSym p a` with an integer `a` and a prime number `p`
is the same as the Jacobi symbol `J(a | p)`. -/
theorem legendreSym.to_jacobiSym (p : ℕ) [fp : Fact p.Prime] (a : ℤ) :
legendreSym p a = J(a | p) := by
simp only [jacobiSym, primeFactorsList_prime fp.1, List.prod_cons, List.prod_nil, mul_one,
List.pmap]
/-- The Jacobi symbol is multiplicative in its second argument. -/
theorem mul_right' (a : ℤ) {b₁ b₂ : ℕ} (hb₁ : b₁ ≠ 0) (hb₂ : b₂ ≠ 0) :
J(a | b₁ * b₂) = J(a | b₁) * J(a | b₂) := by
rw [jacobiSym, ((perm_primeFactorsList_mul hb₁ hb₂).pmap _).prod_eq, List.pmap_append,
List.prod_append]
pick_goal 2
· exact fun p hp =>
(List.mem_append.mp hp).elim prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList
· rfl
/-- The Jacobi symbol is multiplicative in its second argument. -/
theorem mul_right (a : ℤ) (b₁ b₂ : ℕ) [NeZero b₁] [NeZero b₂] :
J(a | b₁ * b₂) = J(a | b₁) * J(a | b₂) :=
mul_right' a (NeZero.ne b₁) (NeZero.ne b₂)
/-- The Jacobi symbol takes only the values `0`, `1` and `-1`. -/
theorem trichotomy (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : J(a | b) = 0 ∨ J(a | b) = 1 ∨ J(a | b) = -1 :=
((MonoidHom.mrange (@SignType.castHom ℤ _ _).toMonoidHom).copy {0, 1, -1} <| by
rw [Set.pair_comm]
exact (SignType.range_eq SignType.castHom).symm).list_prod_mem
(by
intro _ ha'
rcases List.mem_pmap.mp ha' with ⟨p, hp, rfl⟩
haveI : Fact p.Prime := ⟨prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList hp⟩
exact quadraticChar_isQuadratic (ZMod p) a)
/-- The symbol `J(1 | b)` has the value `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem one_left (b : ℕ) : J(1 | b) = 1 :=
List.prod_eq_one fun z hz => by
let ⟨p, hp, he⟩ := List.mem_pmap.1 hz
rw [← he, legendreSym.at_one]
/-- The Jacobi symbol is multiplicative in its first argument. -/
theorem mul_left (a₁ a₂ : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : J(a₁ * a₂ | b) = J(a₁ | b) * J(a₂ | b) := by
simp_rw [jacobiSym, List.pmap_eq_map_attach, legendreSym.mul _ _ _]
exact List.prod_map_mul (α := ℤ) (l := (primeFactorsList b).attach)
(f := fun x ↦ @legendreSym x {out := prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList x.2} a₁)
(g := fun x ↦ @legendreSym x {out := prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList x.2} a₂)
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` vanishes iff `a` and `b` are not coprime (assuming `b ≠ 0`). -/
theorem eq_zero_iff_not_coprime {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} [NeZero b] : J(a | b) = 0 ↔ a.gcd b ≠ 1 :=
List.prod_eq_zero_iff.trans
(by
rw [List.mem_pmap, Int.gcd_eq_natAbs, Ne, Prime.not_coprime_iff_dvd]
simp_rw [legendreSym.eq_zero_iff _ _, intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd,
mem_primeFactorsList (NeZero.ne b), ← Int.natCast_dvd, Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, exists_prop,
and_assoc, _root_.and_comm])
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` is nonzero when `a` and `b` are coprime. -/
protected theorem ne_zero {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : a.gcd b = 1) : J(a | b) ≠ 0 := by
| rcases eq_zero_or_neZero b with hb | _
· rw [hb, zero_right]
exact one_ne_zero
· contrapose! h; exact eq_zero_iff_not_coprime.1 h
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` vanishes if and only if `b ≠ 0` and `a` and `b` are not coprime. -/
theorem eq_zero_iff {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} : J(a | b) = 0 ↔ b ≠ 0 ∧ a.gcd b ≠ 1 :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with hb | hb
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LegendreSymbol/JacobiSymbol.lean | 167 | 175 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Computability.Halting
import Mathlib.Computability.TuringMachine
import Mathlib.Data.Num.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Tactic.DeriveFintype
import Mathlib.Computability.TMConfig
/-!
# Modelling partial recursive functions using Turing machines
The files `TMConfig` and `TMToPartrec` define a simplified basis for partial recursive functions,
and a `Turing.TM2` model
Turing machine for evaluating these functions. This amounts to a constructive proof that every
`Partrec` function can be evaluated by a Turing machine.
## Main definitions
* `PartrecToTM2.tr`: A TM2 turing machine which can evaluate `code` programs
-/
open List (Vector)
open Function (update)
open Relation
namespace Turing
/-!
## Simulating sequentialized partial recursive functions in TM2
At this point we have a sequential model of partial recursive functions: the `Cfg` type and
`step : Cfg → Option Cfg` function from `TMConfig.lean`. The key feature of this model is that
it does a finite amount of computation (in fact, an amount which is statically bounded by the size
of the program) between each step, and no individual step can diverge (unlike the compositional
semantics, where every sub-part of the computation is potentially divergent). So we can utilize the
same techniques as in the other TM simulations in `Computability.TuringMachine` to prove that
each step corresponds to a finite number of steps in a lower level model. (We don't prove it here,
but in anticipation of the complexity class P, the simulation is actually polynomial-time as well.)
The target model is `Turing.TM2`, which has a fixed finite set of stacks, a bit of local storage,
with programs selected from a potentially infinite (but finitely accessible) set of program
positions, or labels `Λ`, each of which executes a finite sequence of basic stack commands.
For this program we will need four stacks, each on an alphabet `Γ'` like so:
inductive Γ' | consₗ | cons | bit0 | bit1
We represent a number as a bit sequence, lists of numbers by putting `cons` after each element, and
lists of lists of natural numbers by putting `consₗ` after each list. For example:
0 ~> []
1 ~> [bit1]
6 ~> [bit0, bit1, bit1]
[1, 2] ~> [bit1, cons, bit0, bit1, cons]
[[], [1, 2]] ~> [consₗ, bit1, cons, bit0, bit1, cons, consₗ]
The four stacks are `main`, `rev`, `aux`, `stack`. In normal mode, `main` contains the input to the
current program (a `List ℕ`) and `stack` contains data (a `List (List ℕ)`) associated to the
current continuation, and in `ret` mode `main` contains the value that is being passed to the
continuation and `stack` contains the data for the continuation. The `rev` and `aux` stacks are
usually empty; `rev` is used to store reversed data when e.g. moving a value from one stack to
another, while `aux` is used as a temporary for a `main`/`stack` swap that happens during `cons₁`
evaluation.
The only local store we need is `Option Γ'`, which stores the result of the last pop
operation. (Most of our working data are natural numbers, which are too large to fit in the local
store.)
The continuations from the previous section are data-carrying, containing all the values that have
been computed and are awaiting other arguments. In order to have only a finite number of
continuations appear in the program so that they can be used in machine states, we separate the
data part (anything with type `List ℕ`) from the `Cont` type, producing a `Cont'` type that lacks
this information. The data is kept on the `stack` stack.
Because we want to have subroutines for e.g. moving an entire stack to another place, we use an
infinite inductive type `Λ'` so that we can execute a program and then return to do something else
without having to define too many different kinds of intermediate states. (We must nevertheless
prove that only finitely many labels are accessible.) The labels are:
* `move p k₁ k₂ q`: move elements from stack `k₁` to `k₂` while `p` holds of the value being moved.
The last element, that fails `p`, is placed in neither stack but left in the local store.
At the end of the operation, `k₂` will have the elements of `k₁` in reverse order. Then do `q`.
* `clear p k q`: delete elements from stack `k` until `p` is true. Like `move`, the last element is
left in the local storage. Then do `q`.
* `copy q`: Move all elements from `rev` to both `main` and `stack` (in reverse order),
then do `q`. That is, it takes `(a, b, c, d)` to `(b.reverse ++ a, [], c, b.reverse ++ d)`.
* `push k f q`: push `f s`, where `s` is the local store, to stack `k`, then do `q`. This is a
duplicate of the `push` instruction that is part of the TM2 model, but by having a subroutine
just for this purpose we can build up programs to execute inside a `goto` statement, where we
have the flexibility to be general recursive.
* `read (f : Option Γ' → Λ')`: go to state `f s` where `s` is the local store. Again this is only
here for convenience.
* `succ q`: perform a successor operation. Assuming `[n]` is encoded on `main` before,
`[n+1]` will be on main after. This implements successor for binary natural numbers.
* `pred q₁ q₂`: perform a predecessor operation or `case` statement. If `[]` is encoded on
`main` before, then we transition to `q₁` with `[]` on main; if `(0 :: v)` is on `main` before
then `v` will be on `main` after and we transition to `q₁`; and if `(n+1 :: v)` is on `main`
before then `n :: v` will be on `main` after and we transition to `q₂`.
* `ret k`: call continuation `k`. Each continuation has its own interpretation of the data in
`stack` and sets up the data for the next continuation.
* `ret (cons₁ fs k)`: `v :: KData` on `stack` and `ns` on `main`, and the next step expects
`v` on `main` and `ns :: KData` on `stack`. So we have to do a little dance here with six
reverse-moves using the `aux` stack to perform a three-point swap, each of which involves two
reversals.
* `ret (cons₂ k)`: `ns :: KData` is on `stack` and `v` is on `main`, and we have to put
`ns.headI :: v` on `main` and `KData` on `stack`. This is done using the `head` subroutine.
* `ret (fix f k)`: This stores no data, so we just check if `main` starts with `0` and
if so, remove it and call `k`, otherwise `clear` the first value and call `f`.
* `ret halt`: the stack is empty, and `main` has the output. Do nothing and halt.
In addition to these basic states, we define some additional subroutines that are used in the
above:
* `push'`, `peek'`, `pop'` are special versions of the builtins that use the local store to supply
inputs and outputs.
* `unrev`: special case `move false rev main` to move everything from `rev` back to `main`. Used as
a cleanup operation in several functions.
* `moveExcl p k₁ k₂ q`: same as `move` but pushes the last value read back onto the source stack.
* `move₂ p k₁ k₂ q`: double `move`, so that the result comes out in the right order at the target
stack. Implemented as `moveExcl p k rev; move false rev k₂`. Assumes that neither `k₁` nor `k₂`
is `rev` and `rev` is initially empty.
* `head k q`: get the first natural number from stack `k` and reverse-move it to `rev`, then clear
the rest of the list at `k` and then `unrev` to reverse-move the head value to `main`. This is
used with `k = main` to implement regular `head`, i.e. if `v` is on `main` before then `[v.headI]`
will be on `main` after; and also with `k = stack` for the `cons` operation, which has `v` on
`main` and `ns :: KData` on `stack`, and results in `KData` on `stack` and `ns.headI :: v` on
`main`.
* `trNormal` is the main entry point, defining states that perform a given `code` computation.
It mostly just dispatches to functions written above.
The main theorem of this section is `tr_eval`, which asserts that for each that for each code `c`,
the state `init c v` steps to `halt v'` in finitely many steps if and only if
`Code.eval c v = some v'`.
-/
namespace PartrecToTM2
section
open ToPartrec
/-- The alphabet for the stacks in the program. `bit0` and `bit1` are used to represent `ℕ` values
as lists of binary digits, `cons` is used to separate `List ℕ` values, and `consₗ` is used to
separate `List (List ℕ)` values. See the section documentation. -/
inductive Γ'
| | consₗ
| Mathlib/Computability/TMToPartrec.lean | 155 | 155 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Reid Barton, Mario Carneiro, Kim Morrison, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Category.ULift
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EssentiallySmall
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.EpiMono
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Basic
/-!
# Existence of limits and colimits
In `CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit` we defined `IsLimit c`,
the data showing that a cone `c` is a limit cone.
The two main structures defined in this file are:
* `LimitCone F`, which consists of a choice of cone for `F` and the fact it is a limit cone, and
* `HasLimit F`, asserting the mere existence of some limit cone for `F`.
`HasLimit` is a propositional typeclass
(it's important that it is a proposition merely asserting the existence of a limit,
as otherwise we would have non-defeq problems from incompatible instances).
While `HasLimit` only asserts the existence of a limit cone,
we happily use the axiom of choice in mathlib,
so there are convenience functions all depending on `HasLimit F`:
* `limit F : C`, producing some limit object (of course all such are isomorphic)
* `limit.π F j : limit F ⟶ F.obj j`, the morphisms out of the limit,
* `limit.lift F c : c.pt ⟶ limit F`, the universal morphism from any other `c : Cone F`, etc.
Key to using the `HasLimit` interface is that there is an `@[ext]` lemma stating that
to check `f = g`, for `f g : Z ⟶ limit F`, it suffices to check `f ≫ limit.π F j = g ≫ limit.π F j`
for every `j`.
This, combined with `@[simp]` lemmas, makes it possible to prove many easy facts about limits using
automation (e.g. `tidy`).
There are abbreviations `HasLimitsOfShape J C` and `HasLimits C`
asserting the existence of classes of limits.
Later more are introduced, for finite limits, special shapes of limits, etc.
Ideally, many results about limits should be stated first in terms of `IsLimit`,
and then a result in terms of `HasLimit` derived from this.
At this point, however, this is far from uniformly achieved in mathlib ---
often statements are only written in terms of `HasLimit`.
## Implementation
At present we simply say everything twice, in order to handle both limits and colimits.
It would be highly desirable to have some automation support,
e.g. a `@[dualize]` attribute that behaves similarly to `@[to_additive]`.
## References
* [Stacks: Limits and colimits](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/002D)
-/
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Functor Opposite
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
-- morphism levels before object levels. See note [CategoryTheory universes].
universe v₁ u₁ v₂ u₂ v₃ u₃ v v' v'' u u' u''
variable {J : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J] {K : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} K]
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable {F : J ⥤ C}
section Limit
/-- `LimitCone F` contains a cone over `F` together with the information that it is a limit. -/
structure LimitCone (F : J ⥤ C) where
/-- The cone itself -/
cone : Cone F
/-- The proof that is the limit cone -/
isLimit : IsLimit cone
/-- `HasLimit F` represents the mere existence of a limit for `F`. -/
class HasLimit (F : J ⥤ C) : Prop where mk' ::
/-- There is some limit cone for `F` -/
exists_limit : Nonempty (LimitCone F)
theorem HasLimit.mk {F : J ⥤ C} (d : LimitCone F) : HasLimit F :=
⟨Nonempty.intro d⟩
/-- Use the axiom of choice to extract explicit `LimitCone F` from `HasLimit F`. -/
def getLimitCone (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] : LimitCone F :=
Classical.choice <| HasLimit.exists_limit
variable (J C)
/-- `C` has limits of shape `J` if there exists a limit for every functor `F : J ⥤ C`. -/
class HasLimitsOfShape : Prop where
/-- All functors `F : J ⥤ C` from `J` have limits -/
has_limit : ∀ F : J ⥤ C, HasLimit F := by infer_instance
/-- `C` has all limits of size `v₁ u₁` (`HasLimitsOfSize.{v₁ u₁} C`)
if it has limits of every shape `J : Type u₁` with `[Category.{v₁} J]`.
-/
@[pp_with_univ]
class HasLimitsOfSize (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] : Prop where
/-- All functors `F : J ⥤ C` from all small `J` have limits -/
has_limits_of_shape : ∀ (J : Type u₁) [Category.{v₁} J], HasLimitsOfShape J C := by
infer_instance
/-- `C` has all (small) limits if it has limits of every shape that is as big as its hom-sets. -/
abbrev HasLimits (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] : Prop :=
HasLimitsOfSize.{v, v} C
theorem HasLimits.has_limits_of_shape {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [HasLimits C] (J : Type v)
[Category.{v} J] : HasLimitsOfShape J C :=
HasLimitsOfSize.has_limits_of_shape J
variable {J C}
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) hasLimitOfHasLimitsOfShape {J : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J]
[HasLimitsOfShape J C] (F : J ⥤ C) : HasLimit F :=
HasLimitsOfShape.has_limit F
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) hasLimitsOfShapeOfHasLimits {J : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J]
[HasLimitsOfSize.{v₁, u₁} C] : HasLimitsOfShape J C :=
HasLimitsOfSize.has_limits_of_shape J
-- Interface to the `HasLimit` class.
/-- An arbitrary choice of limit cone for a functor. -/
def limit.cone (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] : Cone F :=
(getLimitCone F).cone
/-- An arbitrary choice of limit object of a functor. -/
def limit (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] :=
(limit.cone F).pt
/-- The projection from the limit object to a value of the functor. -/
def limit.π (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] (j : J) : limit F ⟶ F.obj j :=
(limit.cone F).π.app j
@[reassoc]
theorem limit.π_comp_eqToHom (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] {j j' : J} (hj : j = j') :
limit.π F j ≫ eqToHom (by subst hj; rfl) = limit.π F j' := by
subst hj
simp
@[simp]
theorem limit.cone_x {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] : (limit.cone F).pt = limit F :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem limit.cone_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] : (limit.cone F).π.app = limit.π _ :=
rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.w (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] {j j' : J} (f : j ⟶ j') :
limit.π F j ≫ F.map f = limit.π F j' :=
(limit.cone F).w f
/-- Evidence that the arbitrary choice of cone provided by `limit.cone F` is a limit cone. -/
def limit.isLimit (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] : IsLimit (limit.cone F) :=
(getLimitCone F).isLimit
/-- The morphism from the cone point of any other cone to the limit object. -/
def limit.lift (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) : c.pt ⟶ limit F :=
(limit.isLimit F).lift c
@[simp]
theorem limit.isLimit_lift {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) :
(limit.isLimit F).lift c = limit.lift F c :=
rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.lift_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) (j : J) :
limit.lift F c ≫ limit.π F j = c.π.app j :=
IsLimit.fac _ c j
/-- Functoriality of limits.
Usually this morphism should be accessed through `lim.map`,
but may be needed separately when you have specified limits for the source and target functors,
but not necessarily for all functors of shape `J`.
-/
def limMap {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (α : F ⟶ G) : limit F ⟶ limit G :=
IsLimit.map _ (limit.isLimit G) α
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limMap_π {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (α : F ⟶ G) (j : J) :
limMap α ≫ limit.π G j = limit.π F j ≫ α.app j :=
limit.lift_π _ j
/-- The cone morphism from any cone to the arbitrary choice of limit cone. -/
def limit.coneMorphism {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) : c ⟶ limit.cone F :=
(limit.isLimit F).liftConeMorphism c
@[simp]
theorem limit.coneMorphism_hom {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) :
(limit.coneMorphism c).hom = limit.lift F c :=
rfl
theorem limit.coneMorphism_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) (j : J) :
(limit.coneMorphism c).hom ≫ limit.π F j = c.π.app j := by simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_hom_comp {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {c : Cone F} (hc : IsLimit c)
(j : J) : (IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso hc (limit.isLimit _)).hom ≫ limit.π F j = c.π.app j :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_hom_comp _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {c : Cone F} (hc : IsLimit c)
(j : J) : (IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (limit.isLimit _) hc).inv ≫ limit.π F j = c.π.app j :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp _ _ _
theorem limit.existsUnique {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (t : Cone F) :
∃! l : t.pt ⟶ limit F, ∀ j, l ≫ limit.π F j = t.π.app j :=
(limit.isLimit F).existsUnique _
/-- Given any other limit cone for `F`, the chosen `limit F` is isomorphic to the cone point.
-/
def limit.isoLimitCone {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (t : LimitCone F) : limit F ≅ t.cone.pt :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (limit.isLimit F) t.isLimit
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.isoLimitCone_hom_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (t : LimitCone F) (j : J) :
(limit.isoLimitCone t).hom ≫ t.cone.π.app j = limit.π F j := by
dsimp [limit.isoLimitCone, IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso]
simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.isoLimitCone_inv_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (t : LimitCone F) (j : J) :
(limit.isoLimitCone t).inv ≫ limit.π F j = t.cone.π.app j := by
dsimp [limit.isoLimitCone, IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso]
simp
@[ext]
theorem limit.hom_ext {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {X : C} {f f' : X ⟶ limit F}
(w : ∀ j, f ≫ limit.π F j = f' ≫ limit.π F j) : f = f' :=
(limit.isLimit F).hom_ext w
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.lift_map {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (c : Cone F) (α : F ⟶ G) :
limit.lift F c ≫ limMap α = limit.lift G ((Cones.postcompose α).obj c) := by
ext
rw [assoc, limMap_π, limit.lift_π_assoc, limit.lift_π]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem limit.lift_cone {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] : limit.lift F (limit.cone F) = 𝟙 (limit F) :=
(limit.isLimit _).lift_self
/-- The isomorphism (in `Type`) between
morphisms from a specified object `W` to the limit object,
and cones with cone point `W`.
-/
def limit.homIso (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] (W : C) :
ULift.{u₁} (W ⟶ limit F : Type v) ≅ F.cones.obj (op W) :=
(limit.isLimit F).homIso W
@[simp]
theorem limit.homIso_hom (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] {W : C} (f : ULift (W ⟶ limit F)) :
(limit.homIso F W).hom f = (const J).map f.down ≫ (limit.cone F).π :=
(limit.isLimit F).homIso_hom f
/-- The isomorphism (in `Type`) between
morphisms from a specified object `W` to the limit object,
and an explicit componentwise description of cones with cone point `W`.
-/
def limit.homIso' (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] (W : C) :
ULift.{u₁} (W ⟶ limit F : Type v) ≅
{ p : ∀ j, W ⟶ F.obj j // ∀ {j j' : J} (f : j ⟶ j'), p j ≫ F.map f = p j' } :=
(limit.isLimit F).homIso' W
theorem limit.lift_extend {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) {X : C} (f : X ⟶ c.pt) :
limit.lift F (c.extend f) = f ≫ limit.lift F c := by aesop_cat
/-- If a functor `F` has a limit, so does any naturally isomorphic functor.
-/
theorem hasLimit_of_iso {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (α : F ≅ G) : HasLimit G :=
HasLimit.mk
{ cone := (Cones.postcompose α.hom).obj (limit.cone F)
isLimit := (IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv _ _).symm (limit.isLimit F) }
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-03")] alias hasLimitOfIso := hasLimit_of_iso
theorem hasLimit_iff_of_iso {F G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ≅ G) : HasLimit F ↔ HasLimit G :=
⟨fun _ ↦ hasLimit_of_iso α, fun _ ↦ hasLimit_of_iso α.symm⟩
-- See the construction of limits from products and equalizers
-- for an example usage.
/-- If a functor `G` has the same collection of cones as a functor `F`
which has a limit, then `G` also has a limit. -/
theorem HasLimit.ofConesIso {J K : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J] [Category.{v₂} K] (F : J ⥤ C)
(G : K ⥤ C) (h : F.cones ≅ G.cones) [HasLimit F] : HasLimit G :=
HasLimit.mk ⟨_, IsLimit.ofNatIso (IsLimit.natIso (limit.isLimit F) ≪≫ h)⟩
/-- The limits of `F : J ⥤ C` and `G : J ⥤ C` are isomorphic,
if the functors are naturally isomorphic.
-/
def HasLimit.isoOfNatIso {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (w : F ≅ G) : limit F ≅ limit G :=
IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfNatIso (limit.isLimit F) (limit.isLimit G) w
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem HasLimit.isoOfNatIso_hom_π {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (w : F ≅ G) (j : J) :
(HasLimit.isoOfNatIso w).hom ≫ limit.π G j = limit.π F j ≫ w.hom.app j :=
IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfNatIso_hom_comp _ _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem HasLimit.isoOfNatIso_inv_π {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (w : F ≅ G) (j : J) :
(HasLimit.isoOfNatIso w).inv ≫ limit.π F j = limit.π G j ≫ w.inv.app j :=
IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfNatIso_inv_comp _ _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem HasLimit.lift_isoOfNatIso_hom {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (t : Cone F)
(w : F ≅ G) :
limit.lift F t ≫ (HasLimit.isoOfNatIso w).hom =
limit.lift G ((Cones.postcompose w.hom).obj _) :=
IsLimit.lift_comp_conePointsIsoOfNatIso_hom _ _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem HasLimit.lift_isoOfNatIso_inv {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (t : Cone G)
(w : F ≅ G) :
limit.lift G t ≫ (HasLimit.isoOfNatIso w).inv =
limit.lift F ((Cones.postcompose w.inv).obj _) :=
IsLimit.lift_comp_conePointsIsoOfNatIso_inv _ _ _
/-- The limits of `F : J ⥤ C` and `G : K ⥤ C` are isomorphic,
if there is an equivalence `e : J ≌ K` making the triangle commute up to natural isomorphism.
-/
def HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {G : K ⥤ C} [HasLimit G] (e : J ≌ K)
(w : e.functor ⋙ G ≅ F) : limit F ≅ limit G :=
IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfEquivalence (limit.isLimit F) (limit.isLimit G) e w
@[simp]
theorem HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence_hom_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {G : K ⥤ C} [HasLimit G]
(e : J ≌ K) (w : e.functor ⋙ G ≅ F) (k : K) :
(HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence e w).hom ≫ limit.π G k =
limit.π F (e.inverse.obj k) ≫ w.inv.app (e.inverse.obj k) ≫ G.map (e.counit.app k) := by
simp only [HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence, IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfEquivalence_hom]
dsimp
simp
@[simp]
theorem HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence_inv_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {G : K ⥤ C} [HasLimit G]
(e : J ≌ K) (w : e.functor ⋙ G ≅ F) (j : J) :
(HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence e w).inv ≫ limit.π F j =
limit.π G (e.functor.obj j) ≫ w.hom.app j := by
simp only [HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence, IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfEquivalence_hom]
dsimp
simp
section Pre
variable (F)
variable [HasLimit F] (E : K ⥤ J) [HasLimit (E ⋙ F)]
/-- The canonical morphism from the limit of `F` to the limit of `E ⋙ F`.
-/
def limit.pre : limit F ⟶ limit (E ⋙ F) :=
limit.lift (E ⋙ F) ((limit.cone F).whisker E)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.pre_π (k : K) : limit.pre F E ≫ limit.π (E ⋙ F) k = limit.π F (E.obj k) := by
erw [IsLimit.fac]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem limit.lift_pre (c : Cone F) :
limit.lift F c ≫ limit.pre F E = limit.lift (E ⋙ F) (c.whisker E) := by ext; simp
variable {L : Type u₃} [Category.{v₃} L]
variable (D : L ⥤ K)
@[simp]
theorem limit.pre_pre [h : HasLimit (D ⋙ E ⋙ F)] : haveI : HasLimit ((D ⋙ E) ⋙ F) := h
limit.pre F E ≫ limit.pre (E ⋙ F) D = limit.pre F (D ⋙ E) := by
haveI : HasLimit ((D ⋙ E) ⋙ F) := h
ext j; erw [assoc, limit.pre_π, limit.pre_π, limit.pre_π]; rfl
variable {E F}
/-- -
If we have particular limit cones available for `E ⋙ F` and for `F`,
we obtain a formula for `limit.pre F E`.
-/
theorem limit.pre_eq (s : LimitCone (E ⋙ F)) (t : LimitCone F) :
limit.pre F E = (limit.isoLimitCone t).hom ≫ s.isLimit.lift (t.cone.whisker E) ≫
(limit.isoLimitCone s).inv := by aesop_cat
end Pre
section Post
variable {D : Type u'} [Category.{v'} D]
variable (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] (G : C ⥤ D) [HasLimit (F ⋙ G)]
/-- The canonical morphism from `G` applied to the limit of `F` to the limit of `F ⋙ G`.
-/
def limit.post : G.obj (limit F) ⟶ limit (F ⋙ G) :=
limit.lift (F ⋙ G) (G.mapCone (limit.cone F))
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.post_π (j : J) : limit.post F G ≫ limit.π (F ⋙ G) j = G.map (limit.π F j) := by
erw [IsLimit.fac]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem limit.lift_post (c : Cone F) :
G.map (limit.lift F c) ≫ limit.post F G = limit.lift (F ⋙ G) (G.mapCone c) := by
ext
| rw [assoc, limit.post_π, ← G.map_comp, limit.lift_π, limit.lift_π]
rfl
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/HasLimits.lean | 411 | 412 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Computability.Halting
import Mathlib.Computability.TuringMachine
import Mathlib.Data.Num.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Tactic.DeriveFintype
import Mathlib.Computability.TMConfig
/-!
# Modelling partial recursive functions using Turing machines
The files `TMConfig` and `TMToPartrec` define a simplified basis for partial recursive functions,
and a `Turing.TM2` model
Turing machine for evaluating these functions. This amounts to a constructive proof that every
`Partrec` function can be evaluated by a Turing machine.
## Main definitions
* `PartrecToTM2.tr`: A TM2 turing machine which can evaluate `code` programs
-/
open List (Vector)
open Function (update)
open Relation
namespace Turing
/-!
## Simulating sequentialized partial recursive functions in TM2
At this point we have a sequential model of partial recursive functions: the `Cfg` type and
`step : Cfg → Option Cfg` function from `TMConfig.lean`. The key feature of this model is that
it does a finite amount of computation (in fact, an amount which is statically bounded by the size
of the program) between each step, and no individual step can diverge (unlike the compositional
semantics, where every sub-part of the computation is potentially divergent). So we can utilize the
same techniques as in the other TM simulations in `Computability.TuringMachine` to prove that
each step corresponds to a finite number of steps in a lower level model. (We don't prove it here,
but in anticipation of the complexity class P, the simulation is actually polynomial-time as well.)
The target model is `Turing.TM2`, which has a fixed finite set of stacks, a bit of local storage,
with programs selected from a potentially infinite (but finitely accessible) set of program
positions, or labels `Λ`, each of which executes a finite sequence of basic stack commands.
For this program we will need four stacks, each on an alphabet `Γ'` like so:
inductive Γ' | consₗ | cons | bit0 | bit1
We represent a number as a bit sequence, lists of numbers by putting `cons` after each element, and
lists of lists of natural numbers by putting `consₗ` after each list. For example:
0 ~> []
1 ~> [bit1]
6 ~> [bit0, bit1, bit1]
[1, 2] ~> [bit1, cons, bit0, bit1, cons]
[[], [1, 2]] ~> [consₗ, bit1, cons, bit0, bit1, cons, consₗ]
The four stacks are `main`, `rev`, `aux`, `stack`. In normal mode, `main` contains the input to the
current program (a `List ℕ`) and `stack` contains data (a `List (List ℕ)`) associated to the
current continuation, and in `ret` mode `main` contains the value that is being passed to the
continuation and `stack` contains the data for the continuation. The `rev` and `aux` stacks are
usually empty; `rev` is used to store reversed data when e.g. moving a value from one stack to
another, while `aux` is used as a temporary for a `main`/`stack` swap that happens during `cons₁`
evaluation.
The only local store we need is `Option Γ'`, which stores the result of the last pop
operation. (Most of our working data are natural numbers, which are too large to fit in the local
store.)
The continuations from the previous section are data-carrying, containing all the values that have
been computed and are awaiting other arguments. In order to have only a finite number of
continuations appear in the program so that they can be used in machine states, we separate the
data part (anything with type `List ℕ`) from the `Cont` type, producing a `Cont'` type that lacks
this information. The data is kept on the `stack` stack.
Because we want to have subroutines for e.g. moving an entire stack to another place, we use an
infinite inductive type `Λ'` so that we can execute a program and then return to do something else
without having to define too many different kinds of intermediate states. (We must nevertheless
prove that only finitely many labels are accessible.) The labels are:
* `move p k₁ k₂ q`: move elements from stack `k₁` to `k₂` while `p` holds of the value being moved.
The last element, that fails `p`, is placed in neither stack but left in the local store.
At the end of the operation, `k₂` will have the elements of `k₁` in reverse order. Then do `q`.
* `clear p k q`: delete elements from stack `k` until `p` is true. Like `move`, the last element is
left in the local storage. Then do `q`.
* `copy q`: Move all elements from `rev` to both `main` and `stack` (in reverse order),
then do `q`. That is, it takes `(a, b, c, d)` to `(b.reverse ++ a, [], c, b.reverse ++ d)`.
* `push k f q`: push `f s`, where `s` is the local store, to stack `k`, then do `q`. This is a
duplicate of the `push` instruction that is part of the TM2 model, but by having a subroutine
just for this purpose we can build up programs to execute inside a `goto` statement, where we
have the flexibility to be general recursive.
* `read (f : Option Γ' → Λ')`: go to state `f s` where `s` is the local store. Again this is only
here for convenience.
* `succ q`: perform a successor operation. Assuming `[n]` is encoded on `main` before,
`[n+1]` will be on main after. This implements successor for binary natural numbers.
* `pred q₁ q₂`: perform a predecessor operation or `case` statement. If `[]` is encoded on
`main` before, then we transition to `q₁` with `[]` on main; if `(0 :: v)` is on `main` before
then `v` will be on `main` after and we transition to `q₁`; and if `(n+1 :: v)` is on `main`
before then `n :: v` will be on `main` after and we transition to `q₂`.
* `ret k`: call continuation `k`. Each continuation has its own interpretation of the data in
`stack` and sets up the data for the next continuation.
* `ret (cons₁ fs k)`: `v :: KData` on `stack` and `ns` on `main`, and the next step expects
`v` on `main` and `ns :: KData` on `stack`. So we have to do a little dance here with six
reverse-moves using the `aux` stack to perform a three-point swap, each of which involves two
reversals.
* `ret (cons₂ k)`: `ns :: KData` is on `stack` and `v` is on `main`, and we have to put
`ns.headI :: v` on `main` and `KData` on `stack`. This is done using the `head` subroutine.
* `ret (fix f k)`: This stores no data, so we just check if `main` starts with `0` and
if so, remove it and call `k`, otherwise `clear` the first value and call `f`.
* `ret halt`: the stack is empty, and `main` has the output. Do nothing and halt.
In addition to these basic states, we define some additional subroutines that are used in the
above:
* `push'`, `peek'`, `pop'` are special versions of the builtins that use the local store to supply
inputs and outputs.
* `unrev`: special case `move false rev main` to move everything from `rev` back to `main`. Used as
a cleanup operation in several functions.
* `moveExcl p k₁ k₂ q`: same as `move` but pushes the last value read back onto the source stack.
* `move₂ p k₁ k₂ q`: double `move`, so that the result comes out in the right order at the target
stack. Implemented as `moveExcl p k rev; move false rev k₂`. Assumes that neither `k₁` nor `k₂`
is `rev` and `rev` is initially empty.
* `head k q`: get the first natural number from stack `k` and reverse-move it to `rev`, then clear
the rest of the list at `k` and then `unrev` to reverse-move the head value to `main`. This is
used with `k = main` to implement regular `head`, i.e. if `v` is on `main` before then `[v.headI]`
will be on `main` after; and also with `k = stack` for the `cons` operation, which has `v` on
`main` and `ns :: KData` on `stack`, and results in `KData` on `stack` and `ns.headI :: v` on
`main`.
* `trNormal` is the main entry point, defining states that perform a given `code` computation.
It mostly just dispatches to functions written above.
The main theorem of this section is `tr_eval`, which asserts that for each that for each code `c`,
the state `init c v` steps to `halt v'` in finitely many steps if and only if
`Code.eval c v = some v'`.
-/
| Mathlib/Computability/TMToPartrec.lean | 143 | 143 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Peter Nelson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Peter Nelson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Matroid.Init
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Card
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Powerset
import Mathlib.Order.UpperLower.Closure
/-!
# Matroids
A `Matroid` is a structure that combinatorially abstracts
the notion of linear independence and dependence;
matroids have connections with graph theory, discrete optimization,
additive combinatorics and algebraic geometry.
Mathematically, a matroid `M` is a structure on a set `E` comprising a
collection of subsets of `E` called the bases of `M`,
where the bases are required to obey certain axioms.
This file gives a definition of a matroid `M` in terms of its bases,
and some API relating independent sets (subsets of bases) and the notion of a
basis of a set `X` (a maximal independent subset of `X`).
## Main definitions
* a `Matroid α` on a type `α` is a structure comprising a 'ground set'
and a suitably behaved 'base' predicate.
Given `M : Matroid α` ...
* `M.E` denotes the ground set of `M`, which has type `Set α`
* For `B : Set α`, `M.IsBase B` means that `B` is a base of `M`.
* For `I : Set α`, `M.Indep I` means that `I` is independent in `M`
(that is, `I` is contained in a base of `M`).
* For `D : Set α`, `M.Dep D` means that `D` is contained in the ground set of `M`
but isn't independent.
* For `I : Set α` and `X : Set α`, `M.IsBasis I X` means that `I` is a maximal independent
subset of `X`.
* `M.Finite` means that `M` has finite ground set.
* `M.Nonempty` means that the ground set of `M` is nonempty.
* `RankFinite M` means that the bases of `M` are finite.
* `RankInfinite M` means that the bases of `M` are infinite.
* `RankPos M` means that the bases of `M` are nonempty.
* `Finitary M` means that a set is independent if and only if all its finite subsets are
independent.
* `aesop_mat` : a tactic designed to prove `X ⊆ M.E` for some set `X` and matroid `M`.
## Implementation details
There are a few design decisions worth discussing.
### Finiteness
The first is that our matroids are allowed to be infinite.
Unlike with many mathematical structures, this isn't such an obvious choice.
Finite matroids have been studied since the 1930's,
and there was never controversy as to what is and isn't an example of a finite matroid -
in fact, surprisingly many apparently different definitions of a matroid
give rise to the same class of objects.
However, generalizing different definitions of a finite matroid
to the infinite in the obvious way (i.e. by simply allowing the ground set to be infinite)
gives a number of different notions of 'infinite matroid' that disagree with each other,
and that all lack nice properties.
Many different competing notions of infinite matroid were studied through the years;
in fact, the problem of which definition is the best was only really solved in 2013,
when Bruhn et al. [2] showed that there is a unique 'reasonable' notion of an infinite matroid
(these objects had previously defined by Higgs under the name 'B-matroid').
These are defined by adding one carefully chosen axiom to the standard set,
and adapting existing axioms to not mention set cardinalities;
they enjoy nearly all the nice properties of standard finite matroids.
Even though at least 90% of the literature is on finite matroids,
B-matroids are the definition we use, because they allow for additional generality,
nearly all theorems are still true and just as easy to state,
and (hopefully) the more general definition will prevent the need for a costly future refactor.
The disadvantage is that developing API for the finite case is harder work
(for instance, it is harder to prove that something is a matroid in the first place,
and one must deal with `ℕ∞` rather than `ℕ`).
For serious work on finite matroids, we provide the typeclasses
`[M.Finite]` and `[RankFinite M]` and associated API.
### Cardinality
Just as with bases of a vector space,
all bases of a finite matroid `M` are finite and have the same cardinality;
this cardinality is an important invariant known as the 'rank' of `M`.
For infinite matroids, bases are not in general equicardinal;
in fact the equicardinality of bases of infinite matroids is independent of ZFC [3].
What is still true is that either all bases are finite and equicardinal,
or all bases are infinite. This means that the natural notion of 'size'
for a set in matroid theory is given by the function `Set.encard`, which
is the cardinality as a term in `ℕ∞`. We use this function extensively
in building the API; it is preferable to both `Set.ncard` and `Finset.card`
because it allows infinite sets to be handled without splitting into cases.
### The ground `Set`
A last place where we make a consequential choice is making the ground set of a matroid
a structure field of type `Set α` (where `α` is the type of 'possible matroid elements')
rather than just having a type `α` of all the matroid elements.
This is because of how common it is to simultaneously consider
a number of matroids on different but related ground sets.
For example, a matroid `M` on ground set `E` can have its structure
'restricted' to some subset `R ⊆ E` to give a smaller matroid `M ↾ R` with ground set `R`.
A statement like `(M ↾ R₁) ↾ R₂ = M ↾ R₂` is mathematically obvious.
But if the ground set of a matroid is a type, this doesn't typecheck,
and is only true up to canonical isomorphism.
Restriction is just the tip of the iceberg here;
one can also 'contract' and 'delete' elements and sets of elements
in a matroid to give a smaller matroid,
and in practice it is common to make statements like `M₁.E = M₂.E ∩ M₃.E` and
`((M ⟋ e) ↾ R) ⟋ C = M ⟋ (C ∪ {e}) ↾ R`.
Such things are a nightmare to work with unless `=` is actually propositional equality
(especially because the relevant coercions are usually between sets and not just elements).
So the solution is that the ground set `M.E` has type `Set α`,
and there are elements of type `α` that aren't in the matroid.
The tradeoff is that for many statements, one now has to add
hypotheses of the form `X ⊆ M.E` to make sure than `X` is actually 'in the matroid',
rather than letting a 'type of matroid elements' take care of this invisibly.
It still seems that this is worth it.
The tactic `aesop_mat` exists specifically to discharge such goals
with minimal fuss (using default values).
The tactic works fairly well, but has room for improvement.
A related decision is to not have matroids themselves be a typeclass.
This would make things be notationally simpler
(having `Base` in the presence of `[Matroid α]` rather than `M.Base` for a term `M : Matroid α`)
but is again just too awkward when one has multiple matroids on the same type.
In fact, in regular written mathematics,
it is normal to explicitly indicate which matroid something is happening in,
so our notation mirrors common practice.
### Notation
We use a few nonstandard conventions in theorem names that are related to the above.
First, we mirror common informal practice by referring explicitly to the `ground` set rather
than the notation `E`. (Writing `ground` everywhere in a proof term would be unwieldy, and
writing `E` in theorem names would be unnatural to read.)
Second, because we are typically interested in subsets of the ground set `M.E`,
using `Set.compl` is inconvenient, since `Xᶜ ⊆ M.E` is typically false for `X ⊆ M.E`.
On the other hand (especially when duals arise), it is common to complement
a set `X ⊆ M.E` *within* the ground set, giving `M.E \ X`.
For this reason, we use the term `compl` in theorem names to refer to taking a set difference
with respect to the ground set, rather than a complement within a type. The lemma
`compl_isBase_dual` is one of the many examples of this.
Finally, in theorem names, matroid predicates that apply to sets
(such as `Base`, `Indep`, `IsBasis`) are typically used as suffixes rather than prefixes.
For instance, we have `ground_indep_iff_isBase` rather than `indep_ground_iff_isBase`.
## References
* [J. Oxley, Matroid Theory][oxley2011]
* [H. Bruhn, R. Diestel, M. Kriesell, R. Pendavingh, P. Wollan, Axioms for infinite matroids,
Adv. Math 239 (2013), 18-46][bruhnDiestelKriesselPendavinghWollan2013]
* [N. Bowler, S. Geschke, Self-dual uniform matroids on infinite sets,
Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 144 (2016), 459-471][bowlerGeschke2015]
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Set
/-- A predicate `P` on sets satisfies the **exchange property** if,
for all `X` and `Y` satisfying `P` and all `a ∈ X \ Y`, there exists `b ∈ Y \ X` so that
swapping `a` for `b` in `X` maintains `P`. -/
def Matroid.ExchangeProperty {α : Type*} (P : Set α → Prop) : Prop :=
∀ X Y, P X → P Y → ∀ a ∈ X \ Y, ∃ b ∈ Y \ X, P (insert b (X \ {a}))
/-- A set `X` has the maximal subset property for a predicate `P` if every subset of `X` satisfying
`P` is contained in a maximal subset of `X` satisfying `P`. -/
def Matroid.ExistsMaximalSubsetProperty {α : Type*} (P : Set α → Prop) (X : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ I, P I → I ⊆ X → ∃ J, I ⊆ J ∧ Maximal (fun K ↦ P K ∧ K ⊆ X) J
/-- A `Matroid α` is a ground set `E` of type `Set α`, and a nonempty collection of its subsets
satisfying the exchange property and the maximal subset property. Each such set is called a
`Base` of `M`. An `Indep`endent set is just a set contained in a base, but we include this
predicate as a structure field for better definitional properties.
In most cases, using this definition directly is not the best way to construct a matroid,
since it requires specifying both the bases and independent sets. If the bases are known,
use `Matroid.ofBase` or a variant. If just the independent sets are known,
define an `IndepMatroid`, and then use `IndepMatroid.matroid`.
-/
structure Matroid (α : Type*) where
/-- `M` has a ground set `E`. -/
(E : Set α)
/-- `M` has a predicate `Base` defining its bases. -/
(IsBase : Set α → Prop)
/-- `M` has a predicate `Indep` defining its independent sets. -/
(Indep : Set α → Prop)
/-- The `Indep`endent sets are those contained in `Base`s. -/
(indep_iff' : ∀ ⦃I⦄, Indep I ↔ ∃ B, IsBase B ∧ I ⊆ B)
/-- There is at least one `Base`. -/
(exists_isBase : ∃ B, IsBase B)
/-- For any bases `B`, `B'` and `e ∈ B \ B'`, there is some `f ∈ B' \ B` for which `B-e+f`
is a base. -/
(isBase_exchange : Matroid.ExchangeProperty IsBase)
/-- Every independent subset `I` of a set `X` for is contained in a maximal independent
subset of `X`. -/
(maximality : ∀ X, X ⊆ E → Matroid.ExistsMaximalSubsetProperty Indep X)
/-- Every base is contained in the ground set. -/
(subset_ground : ∀ B, IsBase B → B ⊆ E)
attribute [local ext] Matroid
namespace Matroid
variable {α : Type*} {M : Matroid α}
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-14")] alias Base := IsBase
instance (M : Matroid α) : Nonempty {B // M.IsBase B} :=
nonempty_subtype.2 M.exists_isBase
/-- Typeclass for a matroid having finite ground set. Just a wrapper for `M.E.Finite`. -/
@[mk_iff] protected class Finite (M : Matroid α) : Prop where
/-- The ground set is finite -/
(ground_finite : M.E.Finite)
/-- Typeclass for a matroid having nonempty ground set. Just a wrapper for `M.E.Nonempty`. -/
protected class Nonempty (M : Matroid α) : Prop where
/-- The ground set is nonempty -/
(ground_nonempty : M.E.Nonempty)
theorem ground_nonempty (M : Matroid α) [M.Nonempty] : M.E.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.ground_nonempty
theorem ground_nonempty_iff (M : Matroid α) : M.E.Nonempty ↔ M.Nonempty :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h⟩, fun ⟨h⟩ ↦ h⟩
lemma nonempty_type (M : Matroid α) [h : M.Nonempty] : Nonempty α :=
⟨M.ground_nonempty.some⟩
theorem ground_finite (M : Matroid α) [M.Finite] : M.E.Finite :=
Finite.ground_finite
theorem set_finite (M : Matroid α) [M.Finite] (X : Set α) (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop) : X.Finite :=
M.ground_finite.subset hX
instance finite_of_finite [Finite α] {M : Matroid α} : M.Finite :=
⟨Set.toFinite _⟩
/-- A `RankFinite` matroid is one whose bases are finite -/
@[mk_iff] class RankFinite (M : Matroid α) : Prop where
/-- There is a finite base -/
exists_finite_isBase : ∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ B.Finite
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-09")] alias FiniteRk := RankFinite
instance rankFinite_of_finite (M : Matroid α) [M.Finite] : RankFinite M :=
⟨M.exists_isBase.imp (fun B hB ↦ ⟨hB, M.set_finite B (M.subset_ground _ hB)⟩)⟩
/-- An `RankInfinite` matroid is one whose bases are infinite. -/
@[mk_iff] class RankInfinite (M : Matroid α) : Prop where
/-- There is an infinite base -/
exists_infinite_isBase : ∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ B.Infinite
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-09")] alias InfiniteRk := RankInfinite
/-- A `RankPos` matroid is one whose bases are nonempty. -/
@[mk_iff] class RankPos (M : Matroid α) : Prop where
/-- The empty set isn't a base -/
empty_not_isBase : ¬M.IsBase ∅
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-09")] alias RkPos := RankPos
instance rankPos_nonempty {M : Matroid α} [M.RankPos] : M.Nonempty := by
obtain ⟨B, hB⟩ := M.exists_isBase
obtain rfl | ⟨e, heB⟩ := B.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· exact False.elim <| RankPos.empty_not_isBase hB
exact ⟨e, M.subset_ground B hB heB ⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-20")] alias rkPos_iff_empty_not_base := rankPos_iff
section exchange
namespace ExchangeProperty
variable {IsBase : Set α → Prop} {B B' : Set α}
/-- A family of sets with the exchange property is an antichain. -/
theorem antichain (exch : ExchangeProperty IsBase) (hB : IsBase B) (hB' : IsBase B') (h : B ⊆ B') :
B = B' :=
h.antisymm (fun x hx ↦ by_contra
(fun hxB ↦ let ⟨_, hy, _⟩ := exch B' B hB' hB x ⟨hx, hxB⟩; hy.2 <| h hy.1))
theorem encard_diff_le_aux {B₁ B₂ : Set α}
(exch : ExchangeProperty IsBase) (hB₁ : IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : IsBase B₂) :
(B₁ \ B₂).encard ≤ (B₂ \ B₁).encard := by
obtain (he | hinf | ⟨e, he, hcard⟩) :=
(B₂ \ B₁).eq_empty_or_encard_eq_top_or_encard_diff_singleton_lt
· rw [exch.antichain hB₂ hB₁ (diff_eq_empty.mp he)]
· exact le_top.trans_eq hinf.symm
obtain ⟨f, hf, hB'⟩ := exch B₂ B₁ hB₂ hB₁ e he
have : encard (insert f (B₂ \ {e}) \ B₁) < encard (B₂ \ B₁) := by
rw [insert_diff_of_mem _ hf.1, diff_diff_comm]; exact hcard
have hencard := encard_diff_le_aux exch hB₁ hB'
rw [insert_diff_of_mem _ hf.1, diff_diff_comm, ← union_singleton, ← diff_diff, diff_diff_right,
inter_singleton_eq_empty.mpr he.2, union_empty] at hencard
rw [← encard_diff_singleton_add_one he, ← encard_diff_singleton_add_one hf]
exact add_le_add_right hencard 1
termination_by (B₂ \ B₁).encard
variable {B₁ B₂ : Set α}
/-- For any two sets `B₁`, `B₂` in a family with the exchange property, the differences `B₁ \ B₂`
and `B₂ \ B₁` have the same `ℕ∞`-cardinality. -/
theorem encard_diff_eq (exch : ExchangeProperty IsBase) (hB₁ : IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : IsBase B₂) :
(B₁ \ B₂).encard = (B₂ \ B₁).encard :=
(encard_diff_le_aux exch hB₁ hB₂).antisymm (encard_diff_le_aux exch hB₂ hB₁)
/-- Any two sets `B₁`, `B₂` in a family with the exchange property have the same
`ℕ∞`-cardinality. -/
theorem encard_isBase_eq (exch : ExchangeProperty IsBase) (hB₁ : IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : IsBase B₂) :
B₁.encard = B₂.encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter B₁ B₂, exch.encard_diff_eq hB₁ hB₂, inter_comm,
encard_diff_add_encard_inter]
end ExchangeProperty
end exchange
section aesop
/-- The `aesop_mat` tactic attempts to prove a set is contained in the ground set of a matroid.
It uses a `[Matroid]` ruleset, and is allowed to fail. -/
macro (name := aesop_mat) "aesop_mat" c:Aesop.tactic_clause* : tactic =>
`(tactic|
aesop $c* (config := { terminal := true })
(rule_sets := [$(Lean.mkIdent `Matroid):ident]))
/- We add a number of trivial lemmas (deliberately specialized to statements in terms of the
ground set of a matroid) to the ruleset `Matroid` for `aesop`. -/
variable {X Y : Set α} {e : α}
@[aesop unsafe 5% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem inter_right_subset_ground (hX : X ⊆ M.E) :
X ∩ Y ⊆ M.E := inter_subset_left.trans hX
@[aesop unsafe 5% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem inter_left_subset_ground (hX : X ⊆ M.E) :
Y ∩ X ⊆ M.E := inter_subset_right.trans hX
@[aesop unsafe 5% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem diff_subset_ground (hX : X ⊆ M.E) : X \ Y ⊆ M.E :=
diff_subset.trans hX
@[aesop unsafe 10% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem ground_diff_subset_ground : M.E \ X ⊆ M.E :=
diff_subset_ground rfl.subset
@[aesop unsafe 10% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem singleton_subset_ground (he : e ∈ M.E) : {e} ⊆ M.E :=
singleton_subset_iff.mpr he
@[aesop unsafe 5% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem subset_ground_of_subset (hXY : X ⊆ Y) (hY : Y ⊆ M.E) : X ⊆ M.E :=
hXY.trans hY
@[aesop unsafe 5% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem mem_ground_of_mem_of_subset (hX : X ⊆ M.E) (heX : e ∈ X) : e ∈ M.E :=
hX heX
@[aesop safe (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem insert_subset_ground {e : α} {X : Set α} {M : Matroid α}
(he : e ∈ M.E) (hX : X ⊆ M.E) : insert e X ⊆ M.E :=
insert_subset he hX
@[aesop safe (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
private theorem ground_subset_ground {M : Matroid α} : M.E ⊆ M.E :=
rfl.subset
attribute [aesop safe (rule_sets := [Matroid])] empty_subset union_subset iUnion_subset
end aesop
section IsBase
variable {B B₁ B₂ : Set α}
@[aesop unsafe 10% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
theorem IsBase.subset_ground (hB : M.IsBase B) : B ⊆ M.E :=
M.subset_ground B hB
theorem IsBase.exchange {e : α} (hB₁ : M.IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : M.IsBase B₂) (hx : e ∈ B₁ \ B₂) :
∃ y ∈ B₂ \ B₁, M.IsBase (insert y (B₁ \ {e})) :=
M.isBase_exchange B₁ B₂ hB₁ hB₂ _ hx
theorem IsBase.exchange_mem {e : α}
(hB₁ : M.IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : M.IsBase B₂) (hxB₁ : e ∈ B₁) (hxB₂ : e ∉ B₂) :
∃ y, (y ∈ B₂ ∧ y ∉ B₁) ∧ M.IsBase (insert y (B₁ \ {e})) := by
simpa using hB₁.exchange hB₂ ⟨hxB₁, hxB₂⟩
theorem IsBase.eq_of_subset_isBase (hB₁ : M.IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : M.IsBase B₂) (hB₁B₂ : B₁ ⊆ B₂) :
B₁ = B₂ :=
M.isBase_exchange.antichain hB₁ hB₂ hB₁B₂
theorem IsBase.not_isBase_of_ssubset {X : Set α} (hB : M.IsBase B) (hX : X ⊂ B) : ¬ M.IsBase X :=
fun h ↦ hX.ne (h.eq_of_subset_isBase hB hX.subset)
theorem IsBase.insert_not_isBase {e : α} (hB : M.IsBase B) (heB : e ∉ B) :
¬ M.IsBase (insert e B) :=
fun h ↦ h.not_isBase_of_ssubset (ssubset_insert heB) hB
theorem IsBase.encard_diff_comm (hB₁ : M.IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : M.IsBase B₂) :
(B₁ \ B₂).encard = (B₂ \ B₁).encard :=
M.isBase_exchange.encard_diff_eq hB₁ hB₂
theorem IsBase.ncard_diff_comm (hB₁ : M.IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : M.IsBase B₂) :
(B₁ \ B₂).ncard = (B₂ \ B₁).ncard := by
rw [ncard_def, hB₁.encard_diff_comm hB₂, ← ncard_def]
theorem IsBase.encard_eq_encard_of_isBase (hB₁ : M.IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : M.IsBase B₂) :
B₁.encard = B₂.encard := by
rw [M.isBase_exchange.encard_isBase_eq hB₁ hB₂]
theorem IsBase.ncard_eq_ncard_of_isBase (hB₁ : M.IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : M.IsBase B₂) :
B₁.ncard = B₂.ncard := by
rw [ncard_def B₁, hB₁.encard_eq_encard_of_isBase hB₂, ← ncard_def]
theorem IsBase.finite_of_finite {B' : Set α}
(hB : M.IsBase B) (h : B.Finite) (hB' : M.IsBase B') : B'.Finite :=
(finite_iff_finite_of_encard_eq_encard (hB.encard_eq_encard_of_isBase hB')).mp h
theorem IsBase.infinite_of_infinite (hB : M.IsBase B) (h : B.Infinite) (hB₁ : M.IsBase B₁) :
B₁.Infinite :=
by_contra (fun hB_inf ↦ (hB₁.finite_of_finite (not_infinite.mp hB_inf) hB).not_infinite h)
theorem IsBase.finite [RankFinite M] (hB : M.IsBase B) : B.Finite :=
let ⟨_,hB₀⟩ := ‹RankFinite M›.exists_finite_isBase
hB₀.1.finite_of_finite hB₀.2 hB
theorem IsBase.infinite [RankInfinite M] (hB : M.IsBase B) : B.Infinite :=
let ⟨_,hB₀⟩ := ‹RankInfinite M›.exists_infinite_isBase
hB₀.1.infinite_of_infinite hB₀.2 hB
theorem empty_not_isBase [h : RankPos M] : ¬M.IsBase ∅ :=
h.empty_not_isBase
theorem IsBase.nonempty [RankPos M] (hB : M.IsBase B) : B.Nonempty := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]; rintro rfl; exact M.empty_not_isBase hB
theorem IsBase.rankPos_of_nonempty (hB : M.IsBase B) (h : B.Nonempty) : M.RankPos := by
rw [rankPos_iff]
intro he
obtain rfl := he.eq_of_subset_isBase hB (empty_subset B)
simp at h
theorem IsBase.rankFinite_of_finite (hB : M.IsBase B) (hfin : B.Finite) : RankFinite M :=
⟨⟨B, hB, hfin⟩⟩
theorem IsBase.rankInfinite_of_infinite (hB : M.IsBase B) (h : B.Infinite) : RankInfinite M :=
⟨⟨B, hB, h⟩⟩
theorem not_rankFinite (M : Matroid α) [RankInfinite M] : ¬ RankFinite M := by
intro h; obtain ⟨B,hB⟩ := M.exists_isBase; exact hB.infinite hB.finite
theorem not_rankInfinite (M : Matroid α) [RankFinite M] : ¬ RankInfinite M := by
intro h; obtain ⟨B,hB⟩ := M.exists_isBase; exact hB.infinite hB.finite
theorem rankFinite_or_rankInfinite (M : Matroid α) : RankFinite M ∨ RankInfinite M :=
let ⟨B, hB⟩ := M.exists_isBase
B.finite_or_infinite.imp hB.rankFinite_of_finite hB.rankInfinite_of_infinite
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-27")] alias finite_or_rankInfinite := rankFinite_or_rankInfinite
@[simp]
theorem not_rankFinite_iff (M : Matroid α) : ¬ RankFinite M ↔ RankInfinite M :=
M.rankFinite_or_rankInfinite.elim (fun h ↦ iff_of_false (by simpa) M.not_rankInfinite)
fun h ↦ iff_of_true M.not_rankFinite h
@[simp]
theorem not_rankInfinite_iff (M : Matroid α) : ¬ RankInfinite M ↔ RankFinite M := by
rw [← not_rankFinite_iff, not_not]
theorem IsBase.diff_finite_comm (hB₁ : M.IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : M.IsBase B₂) :
(B₁ \ B₂).Finite ↔ (B₂ \ B₁).Finite :=
finite_iff_finite_of_encard_eq_encard (hB₁.encard_diff_comm hB₂)
theorem IsBase.diff_infinite_comm (hB₁ : M.IsBase B₁) (hB₂ : M.IsBase B₂) :
(B₁ \ B₂).Infinite ↔ (B₂ \ B₁).Infinite :=
infinite_iff_infinite_of_encard_eq_encard (hB₁.encard_diff_comm hB₂)
theorem ext_isBase {M₁ M₂ : Matroid α} (hE : M₁.E = M₂.E)
(h : ∀ ⦃B⦄, B ⊆ M₁.E → (M₁.IsBase B ↔ M₂.IsBase B)) : M₁ = M₂ := by
have h' : ∀ B, M₁.IsBase B ↔ M₂.IsBase B :=
fun B ↦ ⟨fun hB ↦ (h hB.subset_ground).1 hB,
fun hB ↦ (h <| hB.subset_ground.trans_eq hE.symm).2 hB⟩
ext <;> simp [hE, M₁.indep_iff', M₂.indep_iff', h']
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-25")] alias eq_of_isBase_iff_isBase_forall := ext_isBase
theorem ext_iff_isBase {M₁ M₂ : Matroid α} :
M₁ = M₂ ↔ M₁.E = M₂.E ∧ ∀ ⦃B⦄, B ⊆ M₁.E → (M₁.IsBase B ↔ M₂.IsBase B) :=
⟨fun h ↦ by simp [h], fun ⟨hE, h⟩ ↦ ext_isBase hE h⟩
theorem isBase_compl_iff_maximal_disjoint_isBase (hB : B ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
M.IsBase (M.E \ B) ↔ Maximal (fun I ↦ I ⊆ M.E ∧ ∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ Disjoint I B) B := by
simp_rw [maximal_iff, and_iff_right hB, and_imp, forall_exists_index]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨⟨_, h, disjoint_sdiff_right⟩,
fun I hI B' ⟨hB', hIB'⟩ hBI ↦ hBI.antisymm ?_⟩, fun ⟨⟨B', hB', hBB'⟩,h⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [hB'.eq_of_subset_isBase h, ← subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right, diff_eq, compl_inter,
compl_compl] at hIB'
· exact fun e he ↦ (hIB' he).elim (fun h' ↦ (h' (hI he)).elim) id
rw [subset_diff, and_iff_right hB'.subset_ground, disjoint_comm]
exact disjoint_of_subset_left hBI hIB'
rw [h diff_subset B' ⟨hB', disjoint_sdiff_left⟩]
· simpa [hB'.subset_ground]
simp [subset_diff, hB, hBB']
end IsBase
section dep_indep
/-- A subset of `M.E` is `Dep`endent if it is not `Indep`endent . -/
def Dep (M : Matroid α) (D : Set α) : Prop := ¬M.Indep D ∧ D ⊆ M.E
variable {B B' I J D X : Set α} {e f : α}
theorem indep_iff : M.Indep I ↔ ∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ I ⊆ B :=
M.indep_iff' (I := I)
theorem setOf_indep_eq (M : Matroid α) : {I | M.Indep I} = lowerClosure ({B | M.IsBase B}) := by
simp_rw [indep_iff, lowerClosure, LowerSet.coe_mk, mem_setOf, le_eq_subset]
theorem Indep.exists_isBase_superset (hI : M.Indep I) : ∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ I ⊆ B :=
indep_iff.1 hI
theorem dep_iff : M.Dep D ↔ ¬M.Indep D ∧ D ⊆ M.E := Iff.rfl
theorem setOf_dep_eq (M : Matroid α) : {D | M.Dep D} = {I | M.Indep I}ᶜ ∩ Iic M.E := rfl
@[aesop unsafe 30% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
theorem Indep.subset_ground (hI : M.Indep I) : I ⊆ M.E := by
obtain ⟨B, hB, hIB⟩ := hI.exists_isBase_superset
exact hIB.trans hB.subset_ground
@[aesop unsafe 20% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
theorem Dep.subset_ground (hD : M.Dep D) : D ⊆ M.E :=
hD.2
theorem indep_or_dep (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) : M.Indep X ∨ M.Dep X := by
rw [Dep, and_iff_left hX]
apply em
theorem Indep.not_dep (hI : M.Indep I) : ¬ M.Dep I :=
fun h ↦ h.1 hI
theorem Dep.not_indep (hD : M.Dep D) : ¬ M.Indep D :=
hD.1
theorem dep_of_not_indep (hD : ¬ M.Indep D) (hDE : D ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) : M.Dep D :=
⟨hD, hDE⟩
theorem indep_of_not_dep (hI : ¬ M.Dep I) (hIE : I ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) : M.Indep I :=
by_contra (fun h ↦ hI ⟨h, hIE⟩)
@[simp] theorem not_dep_iff (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) : ¬ M.Dep X ↔ M.Indep X := by
rw [Dep, and_iff_left hX, not_not]
@[simp] theorem not_indep_iff (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) : ¬ M.Indep X ↔ M.Dep X := by
rw [Dep, and_iff_left hX]
theorem indep_iff_not_dep : M.Indep I ↔ ¬M.Dep I ∧ I ⊆ M.E := by
rw [dep_iff, not_and, not_imp_not]
exact ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨fun _ ↦ h, h.subset_ground⟩, fun h ↦ h.1 h.2⟩
theorem Indep.subset (hJ : M.Indep J) (hIJ : I ⊆ J) : M.Indep I := by
obtain ⟨B, hB, hJB⟩ := hJ.exists_isBase_superset
exact indep_iff.2 ⟨B, hB, hIJ.trans hJB⟩
theorem Dep.superset (hD : M.Dep D) (hDX : D ⊆ X) (hXE : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) : M.Dep X :=
dep_of_not_indep (fun hI ↦ (hI.subset hDX).not_dep hD)
theorem IsBase.indep (hB : M.IsBase B) : M.Indep B :=
indep_iff.2 ⟨B, hB, subset_rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem empty_indep (M : Matroid α) : M.Indep ∅ :=
Exists.elim M.exists_isBase (fun _ hB ↦ hB.indep.subset (empty_subset _))
theorem Dep.nonempty (hD : M.Dep D) : D.Nonempty := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]; rintro rfl; exact hD.not_indep M.empty_indep
theorem Indep.finite [RankFinite M] (hI : M.Indep I) : I.Finite :=
let ⟨_, hB, hIB⟩ := hI.exists_isBase_superset
hB.finite.subset hIB
theorem Indep.rankPos_of_nonempty (hI : M.Indep I) (hne : I.Nonempty) : M.RankPos := by
obtain ⟨B, hB, hIB⟩ := hI.exists_isBase_superset
exact hB.rankPos_of_nonempty (hne.mono hIB)
theorem Indep.inter_right (hI : M.Indep I) (X : Set α) : M.Indep (I ∩ X) :=
hI.subset inter_subset_left
theorem Indep.inter_left (hI : M.Indep I) (X : Set α) : M.Indep (X ∩ I) :=
hI.subset inter_subset_right
theorem Indep.diff (hI : M.Indep I) (X : Set α) : M.Indep (I \ X) :=
hI.subset diff_subset
theorem IsBase.eq_of_subset_indep (hB : M.IsBase B) (hI : M.Indep I) (hBI : B ⊆ I) : B = I :=
let ⟨B', hB', hB'I⟩ := hI.exists_isBase_superset
hBI.antisymm (by rwa [hB.eq_of_subset_isBase hB' (hBI.trans hB'I)])
theorem isBase_iff_maximal_indep : M.IsBase B ↔ Maximal M.Indep B := by
rw [maximal_subset_iff]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.indep, fun _ ↦ h.eq_of_subset_indep⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨B', hB', hBB'⟩ := h.exists_isBase_superset
rwa [h' hB'.indep hBB']
theorem Indep.isBase_of_maximal (hI : M.Indep I) (h : ∀ ⦃J⦄, M.Indep J → I ⊆ J → I = J) :
M.IsBase I := by
rwa [isBase_iff_maximal_indep, maximal_subset_iff, and_iff_right hI]
theorem IsBase.dep_of_ssubset (hB : M.IsBase B) (h : B ⊂ X) (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
M.Dep X :=
⟨fun hX ↦ h.ne (hB.eq_of_subset_indep hX h.subset), hX⟩
theorem IsBase.dep_of_insert (hB : M.IsBase B) (heB : e ∉ B) (he : e ∈ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
M.Dep (insert e B) := hB.dep_of_ssubset (ssubset_insert heB) (insert_subset he hB.subset_ground)
theorem IsBase.mem_of_insert_indep (hB : M.IsBase B) (heB : M.Indep (insert e B)) : e ∈ B :=
by_contra fun he ↦ (hB.dep_of_insert he (heB.subset_ground (mem_insert _ _))).not_indep heB
/-- If the difference of two IsBases is a singleton, then they differ by an insertion/removal -/
theorem IsBase.eq_exchange_of_diff_eq_singleton (hB : M.IsBase B) (hB' : M.IsBase B')
(h : B \ B' = {e}) : ∃ f ∈ B' \ B, B' = (insert f B) \ {e} := by
obtain ⟨f, hf, hb⟩ := hB.exchange hB' (h.symm.subset (mem_singleton e))
have hne : f ≠ e := by rintro rfl; exact hf.2 (h.symm.subset (mem_singleton f)).1
rw [insert_diff_singleton_comm hne] at hb
refine ⟨f, hf, (hb.eq_of_subset_isBase hB' ?_).symm⟩
rw [diff_subset_iff, insert_subset_iff, union_comm, ← diff_subset_iff, h, and_iff_left rfl.subset]
exact Or.inl hf.1
theorem IsBase.exchange_isBase_of_indep (hB : M.IsBase B) (hf : f ∉ B)
(hI : M.Indep (insert f (B \ {e}))) : M.IsBase (insert f (B \ {e})) := by
obtain ⟨B', hB', hIB'⟩ := hI.exists_isBase_superset
have hcard := hB'.encard_diff_comm hB
rw [insert_subset_iff, ← diff_eq_empty, diff_diff_comm, diff_eq_empty, subset_singleton_iff_eq]
at hIB'
obtain ⟨hfB, (h | h)⟩ := hIB'
· rw [h, encard_empty, encard_eq_zero, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem] at hcard
exact (hcard f ⟨hfB, hf⟩).elim
rw [h, encard_singleton, encard_eq_one] at hcard
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := hcard
obtain (rfl : f = x) := hx.subset ⟨hfB, hf⟩
simp_rw [← h, ← singleton_union, ← hx, sdiff_sdiff_right_self, inf_eq_inter, inter_comm B,
diff_union_inter]
exact hB'
theorem IsBase.exchange_isBase_of_indep' (hB : M.IsBase B) (he : e ∈ B) (hf : f ∉ B)
(hI : M.Indep (insert f B \ {e})) : M.IsBase (insert f B \ {e}) := by
have hfe : f ≠ e := ne_of_mem_of_not_mem he hf |>.symm
rw [← insert_diff_singleton_comm hfe] at *
exact hB.exchange_isBase_of_indep hf hI
lemma insert_isBase_of_insert_indep {M : Matroid α} {I : Set α} {e f : α}
(he : e ∉ I) (hf : f ∉ I) (heI : M.IsBase (insert e I)) (hfI : M.Indep (insert f I)) :
M.IsBase (insert f I) := by
obtain rfl | hef := eq_or_ne e f
· assumption
simpa [diff_singleton_eq_self he, hfI]
using heI.exchange_isBase_of_indep (e := e) (f := f) (by simp [hef.symm, hf])
theorem IsBase.insert_dep (hB : M.IsBase B) (h : e ∈ M.E \ B) : M.Dep (insert e B) := by
rw [← not_indep_iff (insert_subset h.1 hB.subset_ground)]
exact h.2 ∘ (fun hi ↦ insert_eq_self.mp (hB.eq_of_subset_indep hi (subset_insert e B)).symm)
theorem Indep.exists_insert_of_not_isBase (hI : M.Indep I) (hI' : ¬M.IsBase I) (hB : M.IsBase B) :
∃ e ∈ B \ I, M.Indep (insert e I) := by
obtain ⟨B', hB', hIB'⟩ := hI.exists_isBase_superset
obtain ⟨x, hxB', hx⟩ := exists_of_ssubset (hIB'.ssubset_of_ne (by (rintro rfl; exact hI' hB')))
by_cases hxB : x ∈ B
· exact ⟨x, ⟨hxB, hx⟩, hB'.indep.subset (insert_subset hxB' hIB')⟩
obtain ⟨e,he, hBase⟩ := hB'.exchange hB ⟨hxB',hxB⟩
exact ⟨e, ⟨he.1, not_mem_subset hIB' he.2⟩,
indep_iff.2 ⟨_, hBase, insert_subset_insert (subset_diff_singleton hIB' hx)⟩⟩
/-- This is the same as `Indep.exists_insert_of_not_isBase`, but phrased so that
it is defeq to the augmentation axiom for independent sets. -/
theorem Indep.exists_insert_of_not_maximal (M : Matroid α) ⦃I B : Set α⦄ (hI : M.Indep I)
(hInotmax : ¬ Maximal M.Indep I) (hB : Maximal M.Indep B) :
∃ x ∈ B \ I, M.Indep (insert x I) := by
simp only [maximal_subset_iff, hI, not_and, not_forall, exists_prop, true_imp_iff] at hB hInotmax
refine hI.exists_insert_of_not_isBase (fun hIb ↦ ?_) ?_
· obtain ⟨I', hII', hI', hne⟩ := hInotmax
exact hne <| hIb.eq_of_subset_indep hII' hI'
exact hB.1.isBase_of_maximal fun J hJ hBJ ↦ hB.2 hJ hBJ
theorem Indep.isBase_of_forall_insert (hB : M.Indep B)
(hBmax : ∀ e ∈ M.E \ B, ¬ M.Indep (insert e B)) : M.IsBase B := by
refine by_contra fun hnb ↦ ?_
obtain ⟨B', hB'⟩ := M.exists_isBase
obtain ⟨e, he, h⟩ := hB.exists_insert_of_not_isBase hnb hB'
exact hBmax e ⟨hB'.subset_ground he.1, he.2⟩ h
theorem ground_indep_iff_isBase : M.Indep M.E ↔ M.IsBase M.E :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.isBase_of_maximal (fun _ hJ hEJ ↦ hEJ.antisymm hJ.subset_ground), IsBase.indep⟩
theorem IsBase.exists_insert_of_ssubset (hB : M.IsBase B) (hIB : I ⊂ B) (hB' : M.IsBase B') :
∃ e ∈ B' \ I, M.Indep (insert e I) :=
(hB.indep.subset hIB.subset).exists_insert_of_not_isBase
(fun hI ↦ hIB.ne (hI.eq_of_subset_isBase hB hIB.subset)) hB'
@[ext] theorem ext_indep {M₁ M₂ : Matroid α} (hE : M₁.E = M₂.E)
(h : ∀ ⦃I⦄, I ⊆ M₁.E → (M₁.Indep I ↔ M₂.Indep I)) : M₁ = M₂ :=
have h' : M₁.Indep = M₂.Indep := by
ext I
by_cases hI : I ⊆ M₁.E
· rwa [h]
exact iff_of_false (fun hi ↦ hI hi.subset_ground)
(fun hi ↦ hI (hi.subset_ground.trans_eq hE.symm))
ext_isBase hE (fun B _ ↦ by simp_rw [isBase_iff_maximal_indep, h'])
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-25")] alias eq_of_indep_iff_indep_forall := ext_indep
theorem ext_iff_indep {M₁ M₂ : Matroid α} :
M₁ = M₂ ↔ (M₁.E = M₂.E) ∧ ∀ ⦃I⦄, I ⊆ M₁.E → (M₁.Indep I ↔ M₂.Indep I) :=
⟨fun h ↦ by (subst h; simp), fun h ↦ ext_indep h.1 h.2⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-25")] alias eq_iff_indep_iff_indep_forall := ext_iff_indep
/-- If every base of `M₁` is independent in `M₂` and vice versa, then `M₁ = M₂`. -/
lemma ext_isBase_indep {M₁ M₂ : Matroid α} (hE : M₁.E = M₂.E)
(hM₁ : ∀ ⦃B⦄, M₁.IsBase B → M₂.Indep B) (hM₂ : ∀ ⦃B⦄, M₂.IsBase B → M₁.Indep B) : M₁ = M₂ := by
refine ext_indep hE fun I hIE ↦ ⟨fun hI ↦ ?_, fun hI ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨B, hB, hIB⟩ := hI.exists_isBase_superset
exact (hM₁ hB).subset hIB
obtain ⟨B, hB, hIB⟩ := hI.exists_isBase_superset
exact (hM₂ hB).subset hIB
/-- A `Finitary` matroid is one where a set is independent if and only if it all
its finite subsets are independent, or equivalently a matroid whose circuits are finite. -/
@[mk_iff] class Finitary (M : Matroid α) : Prop where
/-- `I` is independent if all its finite subsets are independent. -/
indep_of_forall_finite : ∀ I, (∀ J, J ⊆ I → J.Finite → M.Indep J) → M.Indep I
theorem indep_of_forall_finite_subset_indep {M : Matroid α} [Finitary M] (I : Set α)
(h : ∀ J, J ⊆ I → J.Finite → M.Indep J) : M.Indep I :=
Finitary.indep_of_forall_finite I h
theorem indep_iff_forall_finite_subset_indep {M : Matroid α} [Finitary M] :
M.Indep I ↔ ∀ J, J ⊆ I → J.Finite → M.Indep J :=
⟨fun h _ hJI _ ↦ h.subset hJI, Finitary.indep_of_forall_finite I⟩
instance finitary_of_rankFinite {M : Matroid α} [RankFinite M] : Finitary M where
indep_of_forall_finite I hI := by
refine I.finite_or_infinite.elim (hI _ Subset.rfl) (fun h ↦ False.elim ?_)
obtain ⟨B, hB⟩ := M.exists_isBase
obtain ⟨I₀, hI₀I, hI₀fin, hI₀card⟩ := h.exists_subset_ncard_eq (B.ncard + 1)
obtain ⟨B', hB', hI₀B'⟩ := (hI _ hI₀I hI₀fin).exists_isBase_superset
have hle := ncard_le_ncard hI₀B' hB'.finite
rw [hI₀card, hB'.ncard_eq_ncard_of_isBase hB, Nat.add_one_le_iff] at hle
exact hle.ne rfl
/-- Matroids obey the maximality axiom -/
theorem existsMaximalSubsetProperty_indep (M : Matroid α) :
∀ X, X ⊆ M.E → ExistsMaximalSubsetProperty M.Indep X :=
M.maximality
end dep_indep
section copy
/-- create a copy of `M : Matroid α` with independence and base predicates and ground set defeq
to supplied arguments that are provably equal to those of `M`. -/
@[simps] def copy (M : Matroid α) (E : Set α) (IsBase Indep : Set α → Prop) (hE : E = M.E)
(hB : ∀ B, IsBase B ↔ M.IsBase B) (hI : ∀ I, Indep I ↔ M.Indep I) : Matroid α where
E := E
IsBase := IsBase
Indep := Indep
indep_iff' _ := by simp_rw [hI, hB, M.indep_iff]
exists_isBase := by
simp_rw [hB]
exact M.exists_isBase
isBase_exchange := by
simp_rw [show IsBase = M.IsBase from funext (by simp [hB])]
exact M.isBase_exchange
maximality := by
simp_rw [hE, show Indep = M.Indep from funext (by simp [hI])]
exact M.maximality
subset_ground := by
simp_rw [hE, hB]
exact M.subset_ground
/-- create a copy of `M : Matroid α` with an independence predicate and ground set defeq
to supplied arguments that are provably equal to those of `M`. -/
@[simps!] def copyIndep (M : Matroid α) (E : Set α) (Indep : Set α → Prop)
(hE : E = M.E) (h : ∀ I, Indep I ↔ M.Indep I) : Matroid α :=
M.copy E M.IsBase Indep hE (fun _ ↦ Iff.rfl) h
/-- create a copy of `M : Matroid α` with a base predicate and ground set defeq
to supplied arguments that are provably equal to those of `M`. -/
@[simps!] def copyBase (M : Matroid α) (E : Set α) (IsBase : Set α → Prop)
(hE : E = M.E) (h : ∀ B, IsBase B ↔ M.IsBase B) : Matroid α :=
M.copy E IsBase M.Indep hE h (fun _ ↦ Iff.rfl)
end copy
section IsBasis
/-- A Basis for a set `X ⊆ M.E` is a maximal independent subset of `X`
(Often in the literature, the word 'Basis' is used to refer to what we call a 'Base'). -/
def IsBasis (M : Matroid α) (I X : Set α) : Prop :=
Maximal (fun A ↦ M.Indep A ∧ A ⊆ X) I ∧ X ⊆ M.E
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-14")] alias Basis := IsBasis
/-- `Matroid.IsBasis' I X` is the same as `Matroid.IsBasis I X`,
without the requirement that `X ⊆ M.E`. This is convenient for some
API building, especially when working with rank and closure. -/
def IsBasis' (M : Matroid α) (I X : Set α) : Prop :=
Maximal (fun A ↦ M.Indep A ∧ A ⊆ X) I
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-14")] alias Basis' := IsBasis'
variable {B I J X Y : Set α} {e : α}
theorem IsBasis'.indep (hI : M.IsBasis' I X) : M.Indep I :=
hI.1.1
theorem IsBasis.indep (hI : M.IsBasis I X) : M.Indep I :=
hI.1.1.1
theorem IsBasis.subset (hI : M.IsBasis I X) : I ⊆ X :=
hI.1.1.2
theorem IsBasis.isBasis' (hI : M.IsBasis I X) : M.IsBasis' I X :=
hI.1
theorem IsBasis'.isBasis (hI : M.IsBasis' I X) (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) : M.IsBasis I X :=
⟨hI, hX⟩
theorem IsBasis'.subset (hI : M.IsBasis' I X) : I ⊆ X :=
hI.1.2
@[aesop unsafe 15% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
theorem IsBasis.subset_ground (hI : M.IsBasis I X) : X ⊆ M.E :=
hI.2
theorem IsBasis.isBasis_inter_ground (hI : M.IsBasis I X) : M.IsBasis I (X ∩ M.E) := by
convert hI
rw [inter_eq_self_of_subset_left hI.subset_ground]
@[aesop unsafe 15% (rule_sets := [Matroid])]
theorem IsBasis.left_subset_ground (hI : M.IsBasis I X) : I ⊆ M.E :=
hI.indep.subset_ground
theorem IsBasis.eq_of_subset_indep (hI : M.IsBasis I X) (hJ : M.Indep J) (hIJ : I ⊆ J)
(hJX : J ⊆ X) : I = J :=
hIJ.antisymm (hI.1.2 ⟨hJ, hJX⟩ hIJ)
theorem IsBasis.Finite (hI : M.IsBasis I X) [RankFinite M] : I.Finite := hI.indep.finite
theorem isBasis_iff' :
M.IsBasis I X ↔ (M.Indep I ∧ I ⊆ X ∧ ∀ ⦃J⦄, M.Indep J → I ⊆ J → J ⊆ X → I = J) ∧ X ⊆ M.E := by
rw [IsBasis, maximal_subset_iff]
tauto
theorem isBasis_iff (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
M.IsBasis I X ↔ (M.Indep I ∧ I ⊆ X ∧ ∀ J, M.Indep J → I ⊆ J → J ⊆ X → I = J) := by
rw [isBasis_iff', and_iff_left hX]
theorem isBasis'_iff_isBasis_inter_ground : M.IsBasis' I X ↔ M.IsBasis I (X ∩ M.E) := by
rw [IsBasis', IsBasis, and_iff_left inter_subset_right, maximal_iff_maximal_of_imp_of_forall]
· exact fun I hI ↦ ⟨hI.1, hI.2.trans inter_subset_left⟩
exact fun I hI ↦ ⟨I, rfl.le, hI.1, subset_inter hI.2 hI.1.subset_ground⟩
theorem isBasis'_iff_isBasis (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) : M.IsBasis' I X ↔ M.IsBasis I X := by
rw [isBasis'_iff_isBasis_inter_ground, inter_eq_self_of_subset_left hX]
theorem isBasis_iff_isBasis'_subset_ground : M.IsBasis I X ↔ M.IsBasis' I X ∧ X ⊆ M.E :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.isBasis', h.subset_ground⟩, fun h ↦ (isBasis'_iff_isBasis h.2).mp h.1⟩
theorem IsBasis'.isBasis_inter_ground (hIX : M.IsBasis' I X) : M.IsBasis I (X ∩ M.E) :=
isBasis'_iff_isBasis_inter_ground.mp hIX
theorem IsBasis'.eq_of_subset_indep (hI : M.IsBasis' I X) (hJ : M.Indep J) (hIJ : I ⊆ J)
(hJX : J ⊆ X) : I = J :=
hIJ.antisymm (hI.2 ⟨hJ, hJX⟩ hIJ)
theorem IsBasis'.insert_not_indep (hI : M.IsBasis' I X) (he : e ∈ X \ I) : ¬ M.Indep (insert e I) :=
fun hi ↦ he.2 <| insert_eq_self.1 <| Eq.symm <|
hI.eq_of_subset_indep hi (subset_insert _ _) (insert_subset he.1 hI.subset)
theorem isBasis_iff_maximal (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
M.IsBasis I X ↔ Maximal (fun I ↦ M.Indep I ∧ I ⊆ X) I := by
rw [IsBasis, and_iff_left hX]
theorem Indep.isBasis_of_maximal_subset (hI : M.Indep I) (hIX : I ⊆ X)
(hmax : ∀ ⦃J⦄, M.Indep J → I ⊆ J → J ⊆ X → J ⊆ I) (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
M.IsBasis I X := by
rw [isBasis_iff (by aesop_mat : X ⊆ M.E), and_iff_right hI, and_iff_right hIX]
exact fun J hJ hIJ hJX ↦ hIJ.antisymm (hmax hJ hIJ hJX)
theorem IsBasis.isBasis_subset (hI : M.IsBasis I X) (hIY : I ⊆ Y) (hYX : Y ⊆ X) :
M.IsBasis I Y := by
rw [isBasis_iff (hYX.trans hI.subset_ground), and_iff_right hI.indep, and_iff_right hIY]
exact fun J hJ hIJ hJY ↦ hI.eq_of_subset_indep hJ hIJ (hJY.trans hYX)
@[simp] theorem isBasis_self_iff_indep : M.IsBasis I I ↔ M.Indep I := by
rw [isBasis_iff', and_iff_right rfl.subset, and_assoc, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
exact fun hi ↦ ⟨fun _ _ ↦ subset_antisymm, hi.subset_ground⟩
theorem Indep.isBasis_self (h : M.Indep I) : M.IsBasis I I :=
isBasis_self_iff_indep.mpr h
@[simp] theorem isBasis_empty_iff (M : Matroid α) : M.IsBasis I ∅ ↔ I = ∅ :=
⟨fun h ↦ subset_empty_iff.mp h.subset, fun h ↦ by (rw [h]; exact M.empty_indep.isBasis_self)⟩
theorem IsBasis.dep_of_ssubset (hI : M.IsBasis I X) (hIY : I ⊂ Y) (hYX : Y ⊆ X) : M.Dep Y := by
have : X ⊆ M.E := hI.subset_ground
rw [← not_indep_iff]
exact fun hY ↦ hIY.ne (hI.eq_of_subset_indep hY hIY.subset hYX)
theorem IsBasis.insert_dep (hI : M.IsBasis I X) (he : e ∈ X \ I) : M.Dep (insert e I) :=
hI.dep_of_ssubset (ssubset_insert he.2) (insert_subset he.1 hI.subset)
theorem IsBasis.mem_of_insert_indep (hI : M.IsBasis I X) (he : e ∈ X) (hIe : M.Indep (insert e I)) :
e ∈ I :=
by_contra (fun heI ↦ (hI.insert_dep ⟨he, heI⟩).not_indep hIe)
theorem IsBasis'.mem_of_insert_indep (hI : M.IsBasis' I X) (he : e ∈ X)
(hIe : M.Indep (insert e I)) : e ∈ I :=
hI.isBasis_inter_ground.mem_of_insert_indep ⟨he, hIe.subset_ground (mem_insert _ _)⟩ hIe
theorem IsBasis.not_isBasis_of_ssubset (hI : M.IsBasis I X) (hJI : J ⊂ I) : ¬ M.IsBasis J X :=
fun h ↦ hJI.ne (h.eq_of_subset_indep hI.indep hJI.subset hI.subset)
theorem Indep.subset_isBasis_of_subset (hI : M.Indep I) (hIX : I ⊆ X)
(hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) : ∃ J, M.IsBasis J X ∧ I ⊆ J := by
obtain ⟨J, hJ, hJmax⟩ := M.maximality X hX I hI hIX
exact ⟨J, ⟨hJmax, hX⟩, hJ⟩
theorem Indep.subset_isBasis'_of_subset (hI : M.Indep I) (hIX : I ⊆ X) :
∃ J, M.IsBasis' J X ∧ I ⊆ J := by
simp_rw [isBasis'_iff_isBasis_inter_ground]
exact hI.subset_isBasis_of_subset (subset_inter hIX hI.subset_ground)
theorem exists_isBasis (M : Matroid α) (X : Set α) (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
∃ I, M.IsBasis I X :=
let ⟨_, hI, _⟩ := M.empty_indep.subset_isBasis_of_subset (empty_subset X)
⟨_, hI⟩
theorem exists_isBasis' (M : Matroid α) (X : Set α) : ∃ I, M.IsBasis' I X :=
let ⟨_, hI, _⟩ := M.empty_indep.subset_isBasis'_of_subset (empty_subset X)
⟨_, hI⟩
theorem exists_isBasis_subset_isBasis (M : Matroid α) (hXY : X ⊆ Y) (hY : Y ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
∃ I J, M.IsBasis I X ∧ M.IsBasis J Y ∧ I ⊆ J := by
obtain ⟨I, hI⟩ := M.exists_isBasis X (hXY.trans hY)
obtain ⟨J, hJ, hIJ⟩ := hI.indep.subset_isBasis_of_subset (hI.subset.trans hXY)
exact ⟨_, _, hI, hJ, hIJ⟩
theorem IsBasis.exists_isBasis_inter_eq_of_superset (hI : M.IsBasis I X) (hXY : X ⊆ Y)
(hY : Y ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) : ∃ J, M.IsBasis J Y ∧ J ∩ X = I := by
obtain ⟨J, hJ, hIJ⟩ := hI.indep.subset_isBasis_of_subset (hI.subset.trans hXY)
refine ⟨J, hJ, subset_antisymm ?_ (subset_inter hIJ hI.subset)⟩
exact fun e he ↦ hI.mem_of_insert_indep he.2 (hJ.indep.subset (insert_subset he.1 hIJ))
| theorem exists_isBasis_union_inter_isBasis (M : Matroid α) (X Y : Set α)
(hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) (hY : Y ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
∃ I, M.IsBasis I (X ∪ Y) ∧ M.IsBasis (I ∩ Y) Y :=
let ⟨J, hJ⟩ := M.exists_isBasis Y
| Mathlib/Data/Matroid/Basic.lean | 969 | 972 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Dagur Asgeirsson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Dagur Asgeirsson
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Coherent.Comparison
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Coherent.ExtensiveSheaves
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Coherent.ReflectsPrecoherent
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Coherent.ReflectsPreregular
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.DenseSubsite.InducedTopology
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Whiskering
/-!
# Categories of coherent sheaves
Given a fully faithful functor `F : C ⥤ D` into a precoherent category, which preserves and reflects
finite effective epi families, and satisfies the property `F.EffectivelyEnough` (meaning that to
every object in `C` there is an effective epi from an object in the image of `F`), the categories
of coherent sheaves on `C` and `D` are equivalent (see
`CategoryTheory.coherentTopology.equivalence`).
The main application of this equivalence is the characterisation of condensed sets as coherent
sheaves on either `CompHaus`, `Profinite` or `Stonean`. See the file `Condensed/Equivalence.lean`
We give the corresponding result for the regular topology as well (see
`CategoryTheory.regularTopology.equivalence`).
-/
universe v₁ v₂ v₃ v₄ u₁ u₂ u₃ u₄
namespace CategoryTheory
open Limits Functor regularTopology
variable {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D] (F : C ⥤ D)
namespace coherentTopology
variable [F.PreservesFiniteEffectiveEpiFamilies] [F.ReflectsFiniteEffectiveEpiFamilies]
[F.Full] [F.Faithful] [F.EffectivelyEnough] [Precoherent D]
instance : F.IsCoverDense (coherentTopology _) := by
refine F.isCoverDense_of_generate_singleton_functor_π_mem _ fun B ↦ ⟨_, F.effectiveEpiOver B, ?_⟩
apply Coverage.Saturate.of
refine ⟨Unit, inferInstance, fun _ => F.effectiveEpiOverObj B,
fun _ => F.effectiveEpiOver B, ?_ , ?_⟩
· funext; ext -- Do we want `Presieve.ext`?
refine ⟨fun ⟨⟩ ↦ ⟨()⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨⟩
simp
· rw [← effectiveEpi_iff_effectiveEpiFamily]
infer_instance
theorem exists_effectiveEpiFamily_iff_mem_induced (X : C) (S : Sieve X) :
(∃ (α : Type) (_ : Finite α) (Y : α → C) (π : (a : α) → (Y a ⟶ X)),
EffectiveEpiFamily Y π ∧ (∀ a : α, (S.arrows) (π a)) ) ↔
(S ∈ F.inducedTopology (coherentTopology _) X) := by
refine ⟨fun ⟨α, _, Y, π, ⟨H₁, H₂⟩⟩ ↦ ?_, fun hS ↦ ?_⟩
· apply (mem_sieves_iff_hasEffectiveEpiFamily (Sieve.functorPushforward _ S)).mpr
refine ⟨α, inferInstance, fun i => F.obj (Y i),
fun i => F.map (π i), ⟨?_,
fun a => Sieve.image_mem_functorPushforward F S (H₂ a)⟩⟩
exact F.map_finite_effectiveEpiFamily _ _
· obtain ⟨α, _, Y, π, ⟨H₁, H₂⟩⟩ := (mem_sieves_iff_hasEffectiveEpiFamily _).mp hS
refine ⟨α, inferInstance, ?_⟩
let Z : α → C := fun a ↦ (Functor.EffectivelyEnough.presentation (F := F) (Y a)).some.p
let g₀ : (a : α) → F.obj (Z a) ⟶ Y a := fun a ↦ F.effectiveEpiOver (Y a)
have : EffectiveEpiFamily _ (fun a ↦ g₀ a ≫ π a) := inferInstance
refine ⟨Z , fun a ↦ F.preimage (g₀ a ≫ π a), ?_, fun a ↦ (?_ : S.arrows (F.preimage _))⟩
· refine F.finite_effectiveEpiFamily_of_map _ _ ?_
simpa using this
· obtain ⟨W, g₁, g₂, h₁, h₂⟩ := H₂ a
rw [h₂]
convert S.downward_closed h₁ (F.preimage (g₀ a ≫ g₂))
exact F.map_injective (by simp)
lemma eq_induced : haveI := F.reflects_precoherent
coherentTopology C =
F.inducedTopology (coherentTopology _) := by
ext X S
have := F.reflects_precoherent
rw [← exists_effectiveEpiFamily_iff_mem_induced F X]
rw [← coherentTopology.mem_sieves_iff_hasEffectiveEpiFamily S]
instance : haveI := F.reflects_precoherent;
F.IsDenseSubsite (coherentTopology C) (coherentTopology D) where
functorPushforward_mem_iff := by
rw [eq_induced F]
rfl
lemma coverPreserving : haveI := F.reflects_precoherent
CoverPreserving (coherentTopology _) (coherentTopology _) F :=
IsDenseSubsite.coverPreserving _ _ _
section SheafEquiv
variable {C : Type u₁} {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₁} C] [Category.{v₂} D] (F : C ⥤ D)
[F.PreservesFiniteEffectiveEpiFamilies] [F.ReflectsFiniteEffectiveEpiFamilies]
[F.Full] [F.Faithful]
[Precoherent D]
[F.EffectivelyEnough]
/--
The equivalence from coherent sheaves on `C` to coherent sheaves on `D`, given a fully faithful
functor `F : C ⥤ D` to a precoherent category, which preserves and reflects effective epimorphic
families, and satisfies `F.EffectivelyEnough`.
-/
noncomputable
def equivalence (A : Type u₃) [Category.{v₃} A] [∀ X, HasLimitsOfShape (StructuredArrow X F.op) A] :
haveI := F.reflects_precoherent
Sheaf (coherentTopology C) A ≌ Sheaf (coherentTopology D) A :=
Functor.IsDenseSubsite.sheafEquiv F _ _ _
end SheafEquiv
section RegularExtensive
variable {C : Type u₁} {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₁} C] [Category.{v₂} D] (F : C ⥤ D)
[F.PreservesEffectiveEpis] [F.ReflectsEffectiveEpis]
[F.Full] [F.Faithful]
[FinitaryExtensive D] [Preregular D]
[FinitaryPreExtensive C]
[PreservesFiniteCoproducts F]
[F.EffectivelyEnough]
/--
The equivalence from coherent sheaves on `C` to coherent sheaves on `D`, given a fully faithful
functor `F : C ⥤ D` to an extensive preregular category, which preserves and reflects effective
epimorphisms and satisfies `F.EffectivelyEnough`.
-/
noncomputable
def equivalence' (A : Type u₃) [Category.{v₃} A]
[∀ X, HasLimitsOfShape (StructuredArrow X F.op) A] :
haveI := F.reflects_precoherent
Sheaf (coherentTopology C) A ≌ Sheaf (coherentTopology D) A :=
Functor.IsDenseSubsite.sheafEquiv F _ _ _
end RegularExtensive
end coherentTopology
namespace regularTopology
variable [F.PreservesEffectiveEpis] [F.ReflectsEffectiveEpis] [F.Full] [F.Faithful]
[F.EffectivelyEnough] [Preregular D]
instance : F.IsCoverDense (regularTopology _) := by
refine F.isCoverDense_of_generate_singleton_functor_π_mem _ fun B ↦ ⟨_, F.effectiveEpiOver B, ?_⟩
apply Coverage.Saturate.of
refine ⟨F.effectiveEpiOverObj B, F.effectiveEpiOver B, ?_, inferInstance⟩
funext; ext -- Do we want `Presieve.ext`?
refine ⟨fun ⟨⟩ ↦ ⟨()⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨⟩
simp
theorem exists_effectiveEpi_iff_mem_induced (X : C) (S : Sieve X) :
(∃ (Y : C) (π : Y ⟶ X),
EffectiveEpi π ∧ S.arrows π) ↔
(S ∈ F.inducedTopology (regularTopology _) X) := by
refine ⟨fun ⟨Y, π, ⟨H₁, H₂⟩⟩ ↦ ?_, fun hS ↦ ?_⟩
· apply (mem_sieves_iff_hasEffectiveEpi (Sieve.functorPushforward _ S)).mpr
refine ⟨F.obj Y, F.map π, ⟨?_, Sieve.image_mem_functorPushforward F S H₂⟩⟩
exact F.map_effectiveEpi _
· obtain ⟨Y, π, ⟨H₁, H₂⟩⟩ := (mem_sieves_iff_hasEffectiveEpi _).mp hS
let g₀ := F.effectiveEpiOver Y
refine ⟨_, F.preimage (g₀ ≫ π), ?_, (?_ : S.arrows (F.preimage _))⟩
· refine F.effectiveEpi_of_map _ ?_
simp only [map_preimage]
infer_instance
· obtain ⟨W, g₁, g₂, h₁, h₂⟩ := H₂
rw [h₂]
convert S.downward_closed h₁ (F.preimage (g₀ ≫ g₂))
exact F.map_injective (by simp)
lemma eq_induced : haveI := F.reflects_preregular
regularTopology C =
F.inducedTopology (regularTopology _) := by
ext X S
have := F.reflects_preregular
rw [← exists_effectiveEpi_iff_mem_induced F X]
rw [← mem_sieves_iff_hasEffectiveEpi S]
instance : haveI := F.reflects_preregular;
F.IsDenseSubsite (regularTopology C) (regularTopology D) where
functorPushforward_mem_iff := by
rw [eq_induced F]
rfl
lemma coverPreserving : haveI := F.reflects_preregular
CoverPreserving (regularTopology _) (regularTopology _) F :=
IsDenseSubsite.coverPreserving _ _ _
section SheafEquiv
variable {C : Type u₁} {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₁} C] [Category.{v₂} D] (F : C ⥤ D)
[F.PreservesEffectiveEpis] [F.ReflectsEffectiveEpis]
[F.Full] [F.Faithful]
[Preregular D]
[F.EffectivelyEnough]
/--
The equivalence from regular sheaves on `C` to regular sheaves on `D`, given a fully faithful
functor `F : C ⥤ D` to a preregular category, which preserves and reflects effective
epimorphisms and satisfies `F.EffectivelyEnough`.
-/
noncomputable
def equivalence (A : Type u₃) [Category.{v₃} A] [∀ X, HasLimitsOfShape (StructuredArrow X F.op) A] :
haveI := F.reflects_preregular
Sheaf (regularTopology C) A ≌ Sheaf (regularTopology D) A :=
Functor.IsDenseSubsite.sheafEquiv F _ _ _
end SheafEquiv
end regularTopology
namespace Presheaf
variable {A : Type u₃} [Category.{v₃} A] (F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A)
theorem isSheaf_coherent_iff_regular_and_extensive [Preregular C] [FinitaryPreExtensive C] :
IsSheaf (coherentTopology C) F ↔
IsSheaf (extensiveTopology C) F ∧ IsSheaf (regularTopology C) F := by
rw [← extensive_regular_generate_coherent]
exact isSheaf_sup (extensiveCoverage C) (regularCoverage C) F
theorem isSheaf_iff_preservesFiniteProducts_and_equalizerCondition
[Preregular C] [FinitaryExtensive C]
[h : ∀ {Y X : C} (f : Y ⟶ X) [EffectiveEpi f], HasPullback f f] :
IsSheaf (coherentTopology C) F ↔ PreservesFiniteProducts F ∧
EqualizerCondition F := by
rw [isSheaf_coherent_iff_regular_and_extensive]
exact and_congr (isSheaf_iff_preservesFiniteProducts _)
(@equalizerCondition_iff_isSheaf _ _ _ _ F _ h).symm
noncomputable instance [Preregular C] [FinitaryExtensive C]
(F : Sheaf (coherentTopology C) A) : PreservesFiniteProducts F.val :=
(Presheaf.isSheaf_iff_preservesFiniteProducts F.val).1
((Presheaf.isSheaf_coherent_iff_regular_and_extensive F.val).mp F.cond).1
theorem isSheaf_iff_preservesFiniteProducts_of_projective [Preregular C] [FinitaryExtensive C]
[∀ (X : C), Projective X] :
IsSheaf (coherentTopology C) F ↔ PreservesFiniteProducts F := by
rw [isSheaf_coherent_iff_regular_and_extensive, and_iff_left (isSheaf_of_projective F),
isSheaf_iff_preservesFiniteProducts]
theorem isSheaf_iff_extensiveSheaf_of_projective [Preregular C] [FinitaryExtensive C]
[∀ (X : C), Projective X] :
IsSheaf (coherentTopology C) F ↔ IsSheaf (extensiveTopology C) F := by
rw [isSheaf_iff_preservesFiniteProducts_of_projective, isSheaf_iff_preservesFiniteProducts]
/--
The categories of coherent sheaves and extensive sheaves on `C` are equivalent if `C` is
preregular, finitary extensive, and every object is projective.
-/
@[simps]
def coherentExtensiveEquivalence [Preregular C] [FinitaryExtensive C] [∀ (X : C), Projective X] :
Sheaf (coherentTopology C) A ≌ Sheaf (extensiveTopology C) A where
functor := {
obj := fun F ↦ ⟨F.val, (isSheaf_iff_extensiveSheaf_of_projective F.val).mp F.cond⟩
map := fun f ↦ ⟨f.val⟩ }
inverse := {
obj := fun F ↦ ⟨F.val, (isSheaf_iff_extensiveSheaf_of_projective F.val).mpr F.cond⟩
map := fun f ↦ ⟨f.val⟩ }
unitIso := Iso.refl _
counitIso := Iso.refl _
variable {B : Type u₄} [Category.{v₄} B]
variable (s : A ⥤ B)
lemma isSheaf_coherent_of_hasPullbacks_comp [Preregular C] [FinitaryExtensive C]
[h : ∀ {Y X : C} (f : Y ⟶ X) [EffectiveEpi f], HasPullback f f] [PreservesFiniteLimits s]
(hF : IsSheaf (coherentTopology C) F) : IsSheaf (coherentTopology C) (F ⋙ s) := by
rw [isSheaf_iff_preservesFiniteProducts_and_equalizerCondition (h := h)] at hF ⊢
have := hF.1
refine ⟨inferInstance, fun _ _ π _ c hc ↦ ⟨?_⟩⟩
exact isLimitForkMapOfIsLimit s _ (hF.2 π c hc).some
| lemma isSheaf_coherent_of_hasPullbacks_of_comp [Preregular C] [FinitaryExtensive C]
[h : ∀ {Y X : C} (f : Y ⟶ X) [EffectiveEpi f], HasPullback f f]
[ReflectsFiniteLimits s]
(hF : IsSheaf (coherentTopology C) (F ⋙ s)) : IsSheaf (coherentTopology C) F := by
rw [isSheaf_iff_preservesFiniteProducts_and_equalizerCondition (h := h)] at hF ⊢
obtain ⟨_, hF₂⟩ := hF
refine ⟨⟨fun n ↦ ⟨fun {K} ↦ ⟨fun {c} hc ↦ ?_⟩⟩⟩, fun _ _ π _ c hc ↦ ⟨?_⟩⟩
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Coherent/SheafComparison.lean | 279 | 285 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.ModEq
/-!
# Congruences modulo an integer
This file defines the equivalence relation `a ≡ b [ZMOD n]` on the integers, similarly to how
`Data.Nat.ModEq` defines them for the natural numbers. The notation is short for `n.ModEq a b`,
which is defined to be `a % n = b % n` for integers `a b n`.
## Tags
modeq, congruence, mod, MOD, modulo, integers
-/
namespace Int
/-- `a ≡ b [ZMOD n]` when `a % n = b % n`. -/
def ModEq (n a b : ℤ) :=
a % n = b % n
@[inherit_doc]
notation:50 a " ≡ " b " [ZMOD " n "]" => ModEq n a b
variable {m n a b c d : ℤ}
instance : Decidable (ModEq n a b) := decEq (a % n) (b % n)
namespace ModEq
@[refl, simp]
protected theorem refl (a : ℤ) : a ≡ a [ZMOD n] :=
@rfl _ _
protected theorem rfl : a ≡ a [ZMOD n] :=
ModEq.refl _
instance : IsRefl _ (ModEq n) :=
⟨ModEq.refl⟩
@[symm]
protected theorem symm : a ≡ b [ZMOD n] → b ≡ a [ZMOD n] :=
Eq.symm
@[trans]
protected theorem trans : a ≡ b [ZMOD n] → b ≡ c [ZMOD n] → a ≡ c [ZMOD n] :=
Eq.trans
instance : IsTrans ℤ (ModEq n) where
trans := @Int.ModEq.trans n
protected theorem eq : a ≡ b [ZMOD n] → a % n = b % n := id
end ModEq
theorem modEq_comm : a ≡ b [ZMOD n] ↔ b ≡ a [ZMOD n] := ⟨ModEq.symm, ModEq.symm⟩
theorem natCast_modEq_iff {a b n : ℕ} : a ≡ b [ZMOD n] ↔ a ≡ b [MOD n] := by
unfold ModEq Nat.ModEq; rw [← Int.ofNat_inj]; simp [natCast_mod]
theorem modEq_zero_iff_dvd : a ≡ 0 [ZMOD n] ↔ n ∣ a := by
rw [ModEq, zero_emod, dvd_iff_emod_eq_zero]
theorem _root_.Dvd.dvd.modEq_zero_int (h : n ∣ a) : a ≡ 0 [ZMOD n] :=
modEq_zero_iff_dvd.2 h
theorem _root_.Dvd.dvd.zero_modEq_int (h : n ∣ a) : 0 ≡ a [ZMOD n] :=
h.modEq_zero_int.symm
theorem modEq_iff_dvd : a ≡ b [ZMOD n] ↔ n ∣ b - a := by
rw [ModEq, eq_comm]
simp [emod_eq_emod_iff_emod_sub_eq_zero, dvd_iff_emod_eq_zero]
theorem modEq_iff_add_fac {a b n : ℤ} : a ≡ b [ZMOD n] ↔ ∃ t, b = a + n * t := by
rw [modEq_iff_dvd]
exact exists_congr fun t => sub_eq_iff_eq_add'
alias ⟨ModEq.dvd, modEq_of_dvd⟩ := modEq_iff_dvd
theorem mod_modEq (a n) : a % n ≡ a [ZMOD n] :=
emod_emod _ _
@[simp]
theorem neg_modEq_neg : -a ≡ -b [ZMOD n] ↔ a ≡ b [ZMOD n] := by
simp only [modEq_iff_dvd, (by omega : -b - -a = -(b - a)), Int.dvd_neg]
@[simp]
theorem modEq_neg : a ≡ b [ZMOD -n] ↔ a ≡ b [ZMOD n] := by simp [modEq_iff_dvd]
namespace ModEq
protected theorem of_dvd (d : m ∣ n) (h : a ≡ b [ZMOD n]) : a ≡ b [ZMOD m] :=
modEq_iff_dvd.2 <| d.trans h.dvd
protected theorem mul_left' (h : a ≡ b [ZMOD n]) : c * a ≡ c * b [ZMOD c * n] := by
obtain hc | rfl | hc := lt_trichotomy c 0
· rw [← neg_modEq_neg, ← modEq_neg, ← Int.neg_mul, ← Int.neg_mul, ← Int.neg_mul]
simp only [ModEq, mul_emod_mul_of_pos _ _ (neg_pos.2 hc), h.eq]
· simp only [Int.zero_mul, ModEq.rfl]
· simp only [ModEq, mul_emod_mul_of_pos _ _ hc, h.eq]
protected theorem mul_right' (h : a ≡ b [ZMOD n]) : a * c ≡ b * c [ZMOD n * c] := by
rw [mul_comm a, mul_comm b, mul_comm n]; exact h.mul_left'
@[gcongr]
protected theorem add (h₁ : a ≡ b [ZMOD n]) (h₂ : c ≡ d [ZMOD n]) : a + c ≡ b + d [ZMOD n] :=
modEq_iff_dvd.2 <| by convert Int.dvd_add h₁.dvd h₂.dvd using 1; omega
@[gcongr] protected theorem add_left (c : ℤ) (h : a ≡ b [ZMOD n]) : c + a ≡ c + b [ZMOD n] :=
ModEq.rfl.add h
@[gcongr] protected theorem add_right (c : ℤ) (h : a ≡ b [ZMOD n]) : a + c ≡ b + c [ZMOD n] :=
h.add ModEq.rfl
protected theorem add_left_cancel (h₁ : a ≡ b [ZMOD n]) (h₂ : a + c ≡ b + d [ZMOD n]) :
c ≡ d [ZMOD n] :=
have : d - c = b + d - (a + c) - (b - a) := by omega
modEq_iff_dvd.2 <| by
rw [this]
exact Int.dvd_sub h₂.dvd h₁.dvd
protected theorem add_left_cancel' (c : ℤ) (h : c + a ≡ c + b [ZMOD n]) : a ≡ b [ZMOD n] :=
ModEq.rfl.add_left_cancel h
protected theorem add_right_cancel (h₁ : c ≡ d [ZMOD n]) (h₂ : a + c ≡ b + d [ZMOD n]) :
a ≡ b [ZMOD n] := by
rw [add_comm a, add_comm b] at h₂
exact h₁.add_left_cancel h₂
protected theorem add_right_cancel' (c : ℤ) (h : a + c ≡ b + c [ZMOD n]) : a ≡ b [ZMOD n] :=
ModEq.rfl.add_right_cancel h
| @[gcongr] protected theorem neg (h : a ≡ b [ZMOD n]) : -a ≡ -b [ZMOD n] :=
h.add_left_cancel (by simp_rw [← sub_eq_add_neg, sub_self]; rfl)
| Mathlib/Data/Int/ModEq.lean | 140 | 141 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Ordmap.Invariants
/-!
# Verification of `Ordnode`
This file uses the invariants defined in `Mathlib.Data.Ordmap.Invariants` to construct `Ordset α`,
a wrapper around `Ordnode α` which includes the correctness invariant of the type. It exposes
parallel operations like `insert` as functions on `Ordset` that do the same thing but bundle the
correctness proofs.
The advantage is that it is possible to, for example, prove that the result of `find` on `insert`
will actually find the element, while `Ordnode` cannot guarantee this if the input tree did not
satisfy the type invariants.
## Main definitions
* `Ordnode.Valid`: The validity predicate for an `Ordnode` subtree.
* `Ordset α`: A well formed set of values of type `α`.
## Implementation notes
Because the `Ordnode` file was ported from Haskell, the correctness invariants of some
of the functions have not been spelled out, and some theorems like
`Ordnode.Valid'.balanceL_aux` show very intricate assumptions on the sizes,
which may need to be revised if it turns out some operations violate these assumptions,
because there is a decent amount of slop in the actual data structure invariants, so the
theorem will go through with multiple choices of assumption.
-/
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Ordnode
section Valid
variable [Preorder α]
/-- The validity predicate for an `Ordnode` subtree. This asserts that the `size` fields are
correct, the tree is balanced, and the elements of the tree are organized according to the
ordering. This version of `Valid` also puts all elements in the tree in the interval `(lo, hi)`. -/
structure Valid' (lo : WithBot α) (t : Ordnode α) (hi : WithTop α) : Prop where
ord : t.Bounded lo hi
sz : t.Sized
bal : t.Balanced
/-- The validity predicate for an `Ordnode` subtree. This asserts that the `size` fields are
correct, the tree is balanced, and the elements of the tree are organized according to the
ordering. -/
def Valid (t : Ordnode α) : Prop :=
Valid' ⊥ t ⊤
theorem Valid'.mono_left {x y : α} (xy : x ≤ y) {t : Ordnode α} {o} (h : Valid' y t o) :
Valid' x t o :=
⟨h.1.mono_left xy, h.2, h.3⟩
theorem Valid'.mono_right {x y : α} (xy : x ≤ y) {t : Ordnode α} {o} (h : Valid' o t x) :
Valid' o t y :=
⟨h.1.mono_right xy, h.2, h.3⟩
theorem Valid'.trans_left {t₁ t₂ : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (h : Bounded t₁ o₁ x)
(H : Valid' x t₂ o₂) : Valid' o₁ t₂ o₂ :=
⟨h.trans_left H.1, H.2, H.3⟩
theorem Valid'.trans_right {t₁ t₂ : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ t₁ x)
(h : Bounded t₂ x o₂) : Valid' o₁ t₁ o₂ :=
⟨H.1.trans_right h, H.2, H.3⟩
theorem Valid'.of_lt {t : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ t o₂) (h₁ : Bounded nil o₁ x)
(h₂ : All (· < x) t) : Valid' o₁ t x :=
⟨H.1.of_lt h₁ h₂, H.2, H.3⟩
theorem Valid'.of_gt {t : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ t o₂) (h₁ : Bounded nil x o₂)
(h₂ : All (· > x) t) : Valid' x t o₂ :=
⟨H.1.of_gt h₁ h₂, H.2, H.3⟩
theorem Valid'.valid {t o₁ o₂} (h : @Valid' α _ o₁ t o₂) : Valid t :=
⟨h.1.weak, h.2, h.3⟩
theorem valid'_nil {o₁ o₂} (h : Bounded nil o₁ o₂) : Valid' o₁ (@nil α) o₂ :=
⟨h, ⟨⟩, ⟨⟩⟩
theorem valid_nil : Valid (@nil α) :=
valid'_nil ⟨⟩
theorem Valid'.node {s l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : BalancedSz (size l) (size r)) (hs : s = size l + size r + 1) :
Valid' o₁ (@node α s l x r) o₂ :=
⟨⟨hl.1, hr.1⟩, ⟨hs, hl.2, hr.2⟩, ⟨H, hl.3, hr.3⟩⟩
theorem Valid'.dual : ∀ {t : Ordnode α} {o₁ o₂}, Valid' o₁ t o₂ → @Valid' αᵒᵈ _ o₂ (dual t) o₁
| .nil, _, _, h => valid'_nil h.1.dual
| .node _ l _ r, _, _, ⟨⟨ol, Or⟩, ⟨rfl, sl, sr⟩, ⟨b, bl, br⟩⟩ =>
let ⟨ol', sl', bl'⟩ := Valid'.dual ⟨ol, sl, bl⟩
let ⟨or', sr', br'⟩ := Valid'.dual ⟨Or, sr, br⟩
⟨⟨or', ol'⟩, ⟨by simp [size_dual, add_comm], sr', sl'⟩,
⟨by rw [size_dual, size_dual]; exact b.symm, br', bl'⟩⟩
theorem Valid'.dual_iff {t : Ordnode α} {o₁ o₂} : Valid' o₁ t o₂ ↔ @Valid' αᵒᵈ _ o₂ (.dual t) o₁ :=
⟨Valid'.dual, fun h => by
have := Valid'.dual h; rwa [dual_dual, OrderDual.Preorder.dual_dual] at this⟩
theorem Valid.dual {t : Ordnode α} : Valid t → @Valid αᵒᵈ _ (.dual t) :=
Valid'.dual
theorem Valid.dual_iff {t : Ordnode α} : Valid t ↔ @Valid αᵒᵈ _ (.dual t) :=
Valid'.dual_iff
theorem Valid'.left {s l x r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (@Ordnode.node α s l x r) o₂) : Valid' o₁ l x :=
⟨H.1.1, H.2.2.1, H.3.2.1⟩
theorem Valid'.right {s l x r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (@Ordnode.node α s l x r) o₂) : Valid' x r o₂ :=
⟨H.1.2, H.2.2.2, H.3.2.2⟩
nonrec theorem Valid.left {s l x r} (H : Valid (@node α s l x r)) : Valid l :=
H.left.valid
nonrec theorem Valid.right {s l x r} (H : Valid (@node α s l x r)) : Valid r :=
H.right.valid
theorem Valid.size_eq {s l x r} (H : Valid (@node α s l x r)) :
size (@node α s l x r) = size l + size r + 1 :=
H.2.1
theorem Valid'.node' {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : BalancedSz (size l) (size r)) : Valid' o₁ (@node' α l x r) o₂ :=
hl.node hr H rfl
theorem valid'_singleton {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (h₁ : Bounded nil o₁ x) (h₂ : Bounded nil x o₂) :
Valid' o₁ (singleton x : Ordnode α) o₂ :=
(valid'_nil h₁).node (valid'_nil h₂) (Or.inl zero_le_one) rfl
theorem valid_singleton {x : α} : Valid (singleton x : Ordnode α) :=
valid'_singleton ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩
theorem Valid'.node3L {l} {x : α} {m} {y : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hm : Valid' x m y)
(hr : Valid' y r o₂) (H1 : BalancedSz (size l) (size m))
(H2 : BalancedSz (size l + size m + 1) (size r)) : Valid' o₁ (@node3L α l x m y r) o₂ :=
(hl.node' hm H1).node' hr H2
theorem Valid'.node3R {l} {x : α} {m} {y : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hm : Valid' x m y)
(hr : Valid' y r o₂) (H1 : BalancedSz (size l) (size m + size r + 1))
(H2 : BalancedSz (size m) (size r)) : Valid' o₁ (@node3R α l x m y r) o₂ :=
hl.node' (hm.node' hr H2) H1
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₁ {a b c d : ℕ} (lr₂ : 3 * (b + c + 1 + d) ≤ 16 * a + 9)
(mr₂ : b + c + 1 ≤ 3 * d) (mm₁ : b ≤ 3 * c) : b < 3 * a + 1 := by omega
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₂ {b c d : ℕ} (mr₂ : b + c + 1 ≤ 3 * d) : c ≤ 3 * d := by omega
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₃ {b c d : ℕ} (mr₁ : 2 * d ≤ b + c + 1) (mm₁ : b ≤ 3 * c) :
d ≤ 3 * c := by omega
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₄ {a b c d : ℕ} (lr₁ : 3 * a ≤ b + c + 1 + d) (mr₂ : b + c + 1 ≤ 3 * d)
(mm₁ : b ≤ 3 * c) : a + b + 1 ≤ 3 * (c + d + 1) := by omega
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₅ {a b c d : ℕ} (lr₂ : 3 * (b + c + 1 + d) ≤ 16 * a + 9)
(mr₁ : 2 * d ≤ b + c + 1) (mm₂ : c ≤ 3 * b) : c + d + 1 ≤ 3 * (a + b + 1) := by omega
theorem Valid'.node4L {l} {x : α} {m} {y : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hm : Valid' x m y)
(hr : Valid' (↑y) r o₂) (Hm : 0 < size m)
(H : size l = 0 ∧ size m = 1 ∧ size r ≤ 1 ∨
0 < size l ∧
ratio * size r ≤ size m ∧
delta * size l ≤ size m + size r ∧
3 * (size m + size r) ≤ 16 * size l + 9 ∧ size m ≤ delta * size r) :
Valid' o₁ (@node4L α l x m y r) o₂ := by
obtain - | ⟨s, ml, z, mr⟩ := m; · cases Hm
suffices
BalancedSz (size l) (size ml) ∧
BalancedSz (size mr) (size r) ∧ BalancedSz (size l + size ml + 1) (size mr + size r + 1) from
Valid'.node' (hl.node' hm.left this.1) (hm.right.node' hr this.2.1) this.2.2
rcases H with (⟨l0, m1, r0⟩ | ⟨l0, mr₁, lr₁, lr₂, mr₂⟩)
· rw [hm.2.size_eq, Nat.succ_inj, add_eq_zero] at m1
rw [l0, m1.1, m1.2]; revert r0; rcases size r with (_ | _ | _) <;>
[decide; decide; (intro r0; unfold BalancedSz delta; omega)]
· rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size r) with r0 | r0
· rw [r0] at mr₂; cases not_le_of_lt Hm mr₂
rw [hm.2.size_eq] at lr₁ lr₂ mr₁ mr₂
by_cases mm : size ml + size mr ≤ 1
· have r1 :=
le_antisymm
((mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans mr₁ (Nat.succ_le_succ mm) : _ ≤ ratio * 1)) r0
rw [r1, add_assoc] at lr₁
have l1 :=
le_antisymm
((mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans lr₁ (add_le_add_right mm 2) : _ ≤ delta * 1))
l0
rw [l1, r1]
revert mm; cases size ml <;> cases size mr <;> intro mm
· decide
· rw [zero_add] at mm; rcases mm with (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩)
decide
· rcases mm with (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩); decide
· rw [Nat.succ_add] at mm; rcases mm with (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩)
rcases hm.3.1.resolve_left mm with ⟨mm₁, mm₂⟩
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size ml) with ml0 | ml0
· rw [ml0, mul_zero, Nat.le_zero] at mm₂
rw [ml0, mm₂] at mm; cases mm (by decide)
have : 2 * size l ≤ size ml + size mr + 1 := by
have := Nat.mul_le_mul_left ratio lr₁
rw [mul_left_comm, mul_add] at this
have := le_trans this (add_le_add_left mr₁ _)
rw [← Nat.succ_mul] at this
exact (mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 this
refine ⟨Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩, Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩, Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· refine (mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans this ?_)
rw [two_mul, Nat.succ_le_iff]
refine add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le ?_ mm₂
simpa using (mul_lt_mul_right ml0).2 (by decide : 1 < 3)
· exact Nat.le_of_lt_succ (Valid'.node4L_lemma₁ lr₂ mr₂ mm₁)
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₂ mr₂
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₃ mr₁ mm₁
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₄ lr₁ mr₂ mm₁
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₅ lr₂ mr₁ mm₂
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₁ {a b c : ℕ} (H2 : 3 * a ≤ b + c) (hb₂ : c ≤ 3 * b) : a ≤ 3 * b := by
omega
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₂ {a b c : ℕ} (H3 : 2 * (b + c) ≤ 9 * a + 3) (h : b < 2 * c) :
b < 3 * a + 1 := by omega
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₃ {a b c : ℕ} (H2 : 3 * a ≤ b + c) (h : b < 2 * c) : a + b < 3 * c := by
omega
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₄ {a b : ℕ} (H3 : 2 * b ≤ 9 * a + 3) : 3 * b ≤ 16 * a + 9 := by
omega
theorem Valid'.rotateL {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H1 : ¬size l + size r ≤ 1) (H2 : delta * size l < size r)
(H3 : 2 * size r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@rotateL α l x r) o₂ := by
obtain - | ⟨rs, rl, rx, rr⟩ := r; · cases H2
rw [hr.2.size_eq, Nat.lt_succ_iff] at H2
rw [hr.2.size_eq] at H3
replace H3 : 2 * (size rl + size rr) ≤ 9 * size l + 3 ∨ size rl + size rr ≤ 2 :=
H3.imp (@Nat.le_of_add_le_add_right _ 2 _) Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ
have H3_0 : size l = 0 → size rl + size rr ≤ 2 := by
intro l0; rw [l0] at H3
exact
(or_iff_right_of_imp fun h => (mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans h (by decide))).1 H3
have H3p : size l > 0 → 2 * (size rl + size rr) ≤ 9 * size l + 3 := fun l0 : 1 ≤ size l =>
(or_iff_left_of_imp <| by omega).1 H3
have ablem : ∀ {a b : ℕ}, 1 ≤ a → a + b ≤ 2 → b ≤ 1 := by omega
have hlp : size l > 0 → ¬size rl + size rr ≤ 1 := fun l0 hb =>
absurd (le_trans (le_trans (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ l0) H2) hb) (by decide)
rw [Ordnode.rotateL_node]; split_ifs with h
· have rr0 : size rr > 0 :=
(mul_lt_mul_left (by decide)).1 (lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.zero_le _) h : ratio * 0 < _)
suffices BalancedSz (size l) (size rl) ∧ BalancedSz (size l + size rl + 1) (size rr) by
exact hl.node3L hr.left hr.right this.1 this.2
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size l) with l0 | l0
· rw [l0]; replace H3 := H3_0 l0
have := hr.3.1
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size rl) with rl0 | rl0
· rw [rl0] at this ⊢
rw [le_antisymm (balancedSz_zero.1 this.symm) rr0]
decide
have rr1 : size rr = 1 := le_antisymm (ablem rl0 H3) rr0
rw [add_comm] at H3
rw [rr1, show size rl = 1 from le_antisymm (ablem rr0 H3) rl0]
decide
replace H3 := H3p l0
rcases hr.3.1.resolve_left (hlp l0) with ⟨_, hb₂⟩
refine ⟨Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩, Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· exact Valid'.rotateL_lemma₁ H2 hb₂
· exact Nat.le_of_lt_succ (Valid'.rotateL_lemma₂ H3 h)
· exact Valid'.rotateL_lemma₃ H2 h
· exact
le_trans hb₂
(Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ <| le_trans (Nat.le_add_left _ _) (Nat.le_add_right _ _))
· rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size rl) with rl0 | rl0
· rw [rl0, not_lt, Nat.le_zero, Nat.mul_eq_zero] at h
replace h := h.resolve_left (by decide)
rw [rl0, h, Nat.le_zero, Nat.mul_eq_zero] at H2
rw [hr.2.size_eq, rl0, h, H2.resolve_left (by decide)] at H1
cases H1 (by decide)
refine hl.node4L hr.left hr.right rl0 ?_
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size l) with l0 | l0
· replace H3 := H3_0 l0
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size rr) with rr0 | rr0
· have := hr.3.1
rw [rr0] at this
exact Or.inl ⟨l0, le_antisymm (balancedSz_zero.1 this) rl0, rr0.symm ▸ zero_le_one⟩
exact Or.inl ⟨l0, le_antisymm (ablem rr0 <| by rwa [add_comm]) rl0, ablem rl0 H3⟩
exact
Or.inr ⟨l0, not_lt.1 h, H2, Valid'.rotateL_lemma₄ (H3p l0), (hr.3.1.resolve_left (hlp l0)).1⟩
theorem Valid'.rotateR {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H1 : ¬size l + size r ≤ 1) (H2 : delta * size r < size l)
(H3 : 2 * size l ≤ 9 * size r + 5 ∨ size l ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@rotateR α l x r) o₂ := by
refine Valid'.dual_iff.2 ?_
rw [dual_rotateR]
refine hr.dual.rotateL hl.dual ?_ ?_ ?_
· rwa [size_dual, size_dual, add_comm]
· rwa [size_dual, size_dual]
· rwa [size_dual, size_dual]
theorem Valid'.balance'_aux {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H₁ : 2 * @size α r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3)
(H₂ : 2 * @size α l ≤ 9 * size r + 5 ∨ size l ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@balance' α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [balance']; split_ifs with h h_1 h_2
· exact hl.node' hr (Or.inl h)
· exact hl.rotateL hr h h_1 H₁
· exact hl.rotateR hr h h_2 H₂
· exact hl.node' hr (Or.inr ⟨not_lt.1 h_2, not_lt.1 h_1⟩)
theorem Valid'.balance'_lemma {α l l' r r'} (H1 : BalancedSz l' r')
(H2 : Nat.dist (@size α l) l' ≤ 1 ∧ size r = r' ∨ Nat.dist (size r) r' ≤ 1 ∧ size l = l') :
2 * @size α r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3 := by
suffices @size α r ≤ 3 * (size l + 1) by omega
rcases H2 with (⟨hl, rfl⟩ | ⟨hr, rfl⟩) <;> rcases H1 with (h | ⟨_, h₂⟩)
· exact le_trans (Nat.le_add_left _ _) (le_trans h (Nat.le_add_left _ _))
· exact
le_trans h₂
(Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ <| le_trans (Nat.dist_tri_right _ _) (Nat.add_le_add_left hl _))
· exact
le_trans (Nat.dist_tri_left' _ _)
(le_trans (add_le_add hr (le_trans (Nat.le_add_left _ _) h)) (by omega))
· rw [Nat.mul_succ]
exact le_trans (Nat.dist_tri_right' _ _) (add_le_add h₂ (le_trans hr (by decide)))
theorem Valid'.balance' {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : ∃ l' r', BalancedSz l' r' ∧
(Nat.dist (size l) l' ≤ 1 ∧ size r = r' ∨ Nat.dist (size r) r' ≤ 1 ∧ size l = l')) :
Valid' o₁ (@balance' α l x r) o₂ :=
let ⟨_, _, H1, H2⟩ := H
Valid'.balance'_aux hl hr (Valid'.balance'_lemma H1 H2) (Valid'.balance'_lemma H1.symm H2.symm)
theorem Valid'.balance {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : ∃ l' r', BalancedSz l' r' ∧
(Nat.dist (size l) l' ≤ 1 ∧ size r = r' ∨ Nat.dist (size r) r' ≤ 1 ∧ size l = l')) :
Valid' o₁ (@balance α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [balance_eq_balance' hl.3 hr.3 hl.2 hr.2]; exact hl.balance' hr H
theorem Valid'.balanceL_aux {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H₁ : size l = 0 → size r ≤ 1) (H₂ : 1 ≤ size l → 1 ≤ size r → size r ≤ delta * size l)
(H₃ : 2 * @size α l ≤ 9 * size r + 5 ∨ size l ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@balanceL α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [balanceL_eq_balance hl.2 hr.2 H₁ H₂, balance_eq_balance' hl.3 hr.3 hl.2 hr.2]
refine hl.balance'_aux hr (Or.inl ?_) H₃
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size r) with r0 | r0
· rw [r0]; exact Nat.zero_le _
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size l) with l0 | l0
· rw [l0]; exact le_trans (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ (H₁ l0)) (by decide)
replace H₂ : _ ≤ 3 * _ := H₂ l0 r0; omega
theorem Valid'.balanceL {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : (∃ l', Raised l' (size l) ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised (size r) r' ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
Valid' o₁ (@balanceL α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [balanceL_eq_balance' hl.3 hr.3 hl.2 hr.2 H]
refine hl.balance' hr ?_
rcases H with (⟨l', e, H⟩ | ⟨r', e, H⟩)
· exact ⟨_, _, H, Or.inl ⟨e.dist_le', rfl⟩⟩
· exact ⟨_, _, H, Or.inr ⟨e.dist_le, rfl⟩⟩
theorem Valid'.balanceR_aux {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H₁ : size r = 0 → size l ≤ 1) (H₂ : 1 ≤ size r → 1 ≤ size l → size l ≤ delta * size r)
(H₃ : 2 * @size α r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@balanceR α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [Valid'.dual_iff, dual_balanceR]
have := hr.dual.balanceL_aux hl.dual
rw [size_dual, size_dual] at this
exact this H₁ H₂ H₃
theorem Valid'.balanceR {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : (∃ l', Raised (size l) l' ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised r' (size r) ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
Valid' o₁ (@balanceR α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [Valid'.dual_iff, dual_balanceR]; exact hr.dual.balanceL hl.dual (balance_sz_dual H)
theorem Valid'.eraseMax_aux {s l x r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (.node s l x r) o₂) :
Valid' o₁ (@eraseMax α (.node' l x r)) ↑(findMax' x r) ∧
size (.node' l x r) = size (eraseMax (.node' l x r)) + 1 := by
have := H.2.eq_node'; rw [this] at H; clear this
induction r generalizing l x o₁ with
| nil => exact ⟨H.left, rfl⟩
| node rs rl rx rr _ IHrr =>
have := H.2.2.2.eq_node'; rw [this] at H ⊢
rcases IHrr H.right with ⟨h, e⟩
refine ⟨Valid'.balanceL H.left h (Or.inr ⟨_, Or.inr e, H.3.1⟩), ?_⟩
rw [eraseMax, size_balanceL H.3.2.1 h.3 H.2.2.1 h.2 (Or.inr ⟨_, Or.inr e, H.3.1⟩)]
rw [size_node, e]; rfl
theorem Valid'.eraseMin_aux {s l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (.node s l x r) o₂) :
Valid' ↑(findMin' l x) (@eraseMin α (.node' l x r)) o₂ ∧
size (.node' l x r) = size (eraseMin (.node' l x r)) + 1 := by
have := H.dual.eraseMax_aux
rwa [← dual_node', size_dual, ← dual_eraseMin, size_dual, ← Valid'.dual_iff, findMax'_dual]
at this
theorem eraseMin.valid : ∀ {t}, @Valid α _ t → Valid (eraseMin t)
| nil, _ => valid_nil
| node _ l x r, h => by rw [h.2.eq_node']; exact h.eraseMin_aux.1.valid
theorem eraseMax.valid {t} (h : @Valid α _ t) : Valid (eraseMax t) := by
rw [Valid.dual_iff, dual_eraseMax]; exact eraseMin.valid h.dual
theorem Valid'.glue_aux {l r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l o₂) (hr : Valid' o₁ r o₂)
(sep : l.All fun x => r.All fun y => x < y) (bal : BalancedSz (size l) (size r)) :
Valid' o₁ (@glue α l r) o₂ ∧ size (glue l r) = size l + size r := by
obtain - | ⟨ls, ll, lx, lr⟩ := l; · exact ⟨hr, (zero_add _).symm⟩
obtain - | ⟨rs, rl, rx, rr⟩ := r; · exact ⟨hl, rfl⟩
dsimp [glue]; split_ifs
· rw [splitMax_eq]
· obtain ⟨v, e⟩ := Valid'.eraseMax_aux hl
suffices H : _ by
refine ⟨Valid'.balanceR v (hr.of_gt ?_ ?_) H, ?_⟩
| · refine findMax'_all (P := fun a : α => Bounded nil (a : WithTop α) o₂)
lx lr hl.1.2.to_nil (sep.2.2.imp ?_)
exact fun x h => hr.1.2.to_nil.mono_left (le_of_lt h.2.1)
· exact @findMax'_all _ (fun a => All (· > a) (.node rs rl rx rr)) lx lr sep.2.1 sep.2.2
· rw [size_balanceR v.3 hr.3 v.2 hr.2 H, add_right_comm, ← e, hl.2.1]; rfl
| Mathlib/Data/Ordmap/Ordset.lean | 412 | 416 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson, Jalex Stark, Kyle Miller. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Jalex Stark, Kyle Miller, Alena Gusakov
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Maps
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Max
import Mathlib.Data.Sym.Card
/-!
# Definitions for finite and locally finite graphs
This file defines finite versions of `edgeSet`, `neighborSet` and `incidenceSet` and proves some
of their basic properties. It also defines the notion of a locally finite graph, which is one
whose vertices have finite degree.
The design for finiteness is that each definition takes the smallest finiteness assumption
necessary. For example, `SimpleGraph.neighborFinset v` only requires that `v` have
finitely many neighbors.
## Main definitions
* `SimpleGraph.edgeFinset` is the `Finset` of edges in a graph, if `edgeSet` is finite
* `SimpleGraph.neighborFinset` is the `Finset` of vertices adjacent to a given vertex,
if `neighborSet` is finite
* `SimpleGraph.incidenceFinset` is the `Finset` of edges containing a given vertex,
if `incidenceSet` is finite
## Naming conventions
If the vertex type of a graph is finite, we refer to its cardinality as `CardVerts`
or `card_verts`.
## Implementation notes
* A locally finite graph is one with instances `Π v, Fintype (G.neighborSet v)`.
* Given instances `DecidableRel G.Adj` and `Fintype V`, then the graph
is locally finite, too.
-/
open Finset Function
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V : Type*} (G : SimpleGraph V) {e : Sym2 V}
section EdgeFinset
variable {G₁ G₂ : SimpleGraph V} [Fintype G.edgeSet] [Fintype G₁.edgeSet] [Fintype G₂.edgeSet]
/-- The `edgeSet` of the graph as a `Finset`. -/
abbrev edgeFinset : Finset (Sym2 V) :=
Set.toFinset G.edgeSet
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_edgeFinset : (G.edgeFinset : Set (Sym2 V)) = G.edgeSet :=
Set.coe_toFinset _
variable {G}
theorem mem_edgeFinset : e ∈ G.edgeFinset ↔ e ∈ G.edgeSet :=
Set.mem_toFinset
theorem not_isDiag_of_mem_edgeFinset : e ∈ G.edgeFinset → ¬e.IsDiag :=
not_isDiag_of_mem_edgeSet _ ∘ mem_edgeFinset.1
theorem edgeFinset_inj : G₁.edgeFinset = G₂.edgeFinset ↔ G₁ = G₂ := by simp
theorem edgeFinset_subset_edgeFinset : G₁.edgeFinset ⊆ G₂.edgeFinset ↔ G₁ ≤ G₂ := by simp
theorem edgeFinset_ssubset_edgeFinset : G₁.edgeFinset ⊂ G₂.edgeFinset ↔ G₁ < G₂ := by simp
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, edgeFinset_mono⟩ := edgeFinset_subset_edgeFinset
alias ⟨_, edgeFinset_strict_mono⟩ := edgeFinset_ssubset_edgeFinset
attribute [mono] edgeFinset_mono edgeFinset_strict_mono
@[simp]
theorem edgeFinset_bot : (⊥ : SimpleGraph V).edgeFinset = ∅ := by simp [edgeFinset]
@[simp]
theorem edgeFinset_sup [Fintype (edgeSet (G₁ ⊔ G₂))] [DecidableEq V] :
(G₁ ⊔ G₂).edgeFinset = G₁.edgeFinset ∪ G₂.edgeFinset := by simp [edgeFinset]
@[simp]
theorem edgeFinset_inf [DecidableEq V] : (G₁ ⊓ G₂).edgeFinset = G₁.edgeFinset ∩ G₂.edgeFinset := by
simp [edgeFinset]
@[simp]
theorem edgeFinset_sdiff [DecidableEq V] :
(G₁ \ G₂).edgeFinset = G₁.edgeFinset \ G₂.edgeFinset := by simp [edgeFinset]
lemma disjoint_edgeFinset : Disjoint G₁.edgeFinset G₂.edgeFinset ↔ Disjoint G₁ G₂ := by
simp_rw [← Finset.disjoint_coe, coe_edgeFinset, disjoint_edgeSet]
lemma edgeFinset_eq_empty : G.edgeFinset = ∅ ↔ G = ⊥ := by
rw [← edgeFinset_bot, edgeFinset_inj]
lemma edgeFinset_nonempty : G.edgeFinset.Nonempty ↔ G ≠ ⊥ := by
rw [Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty, edgeFinset_eq_empty.ne]
theorem edgeFinset_card : #G.edgeFinset = Fintype.card G.edgeSet :=
Set.toFinset_card _
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_univ_card : #(univ : Finset G.edgeSet) = #G.edgeFinset :=
Fintype.card_of_subtype G.edgeFinset fun _ => mem_edgeFinset
variable [Fintype V]
@[simp]
theorem edgeFinset_top [DecidableEq V] :
(⊤ : SimpleGraph V).edgeFinset = ({e | ¬e.IsDiag} : Finset _) := by simp [← coe_inj]
/-- The complete graph on `n` vertices has `n.choose 2` edges. -/
theorem card_edgeFinset_top_eq_card_choose_two [DecidableEq V] :
#(⊤ : SimpleGraph V).edgeFinset = (Fintype.card V).choose 2 := by
simp_rw [Set.toFinset_card, edgeSet_top, Set.coe_setOf, ← Sym2.card_subtype_not_diag]
/-- Any graph on `n` vertices has at most `n.choose 2` edges. -/
theorem card_edgeFinset_le_card_choose_two : #G.edgeFinset ≤ (Fintype.card V).choose 2 := by
classical
rw [← card_edgeFinset_top_eq_card_choose_two]
exact card_le_card (edgeFinset_mono le_top)
end EdgeFinset
section FiniteAt
/-!
## Finiteness at a vertex
This section contains definitions and lemmas concerning vertices that
have finitely many adjacent vertices. We denote this condition by
`Fintype (G.neighborSet v)`.
We define `G.neighborFinset v` to be the `Finset` version of `G.neighborSet v`.
Use `neighborFinset_eq_filter` to rewrite this definition as a `Finset.filter` expression.
-/
variable (v) [Fintype (G.neighborSet v)]
/-- `G.neighbors v` is the `Finset` version of `G.Adj v` in case `G` is
locally finite at `v`. -/
def neighborFinset : Finset V :=
(G.neighborSet v).toFinset
theorem neighborFinset_def : G.neighborFinset v = (G.neighborSet v).toFinset :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_neighborFinset (w : V) : w ∈ G.neighborFinset v ↔ G.Adj v w :=
Set.mem_toFinset
theorem not_mem_neighborFinset_self : v ∉ G.neighborFinset v := by simp
theorem neighborFinset_disjoint_singleton : Disjoint (G.neighborFinset v) {v} :=
Finset.disjoint_singleton_right.mpr <| not_mem_neighborFinset_self _ _
theorem singleton_disjoint_neighborFinset : Disjoint {v} (G.neighborFinset v) :=
Finset.disjoint_singleton_left.mpr <| not_mem_neighborFinset_self _ _
/-- `G.degree v` is the number of vertices adjacent to `v`. -/
def degree : ℕ := #(G.neighborFinset v)
@[simp]
theorem card_neighborFinset_eq_degree : #(G.neighborFinset v) = G.degree v := rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_neighborSet_eq_degree : Fintype.card (G.neighborSet v) = G.degree v :=
(Set.toFinset_card _).symm
theorem degree_pos_iff_exists_adj : 0 < G.degree v ↔ ∃ w, G.Adj v w := by
simp only [degree, card_pos, Finset.Nonempty, mem_neighborFinset]
theorem degree_pos_iff_mem_support : 0 < G.degree v ↔ v ∈ G.support := by
rw [G.degree_pos_iff_exists_adj v, mem_support]
theorem degree_eq_zero_iff_not_mem_support : G.degree v = 0 ↔ v ∉ G.support := by
rw [← G.degree_pos_iff_mem_support v, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero, not_ne_iff]
theorem degree_compl [Fintype (Gᶜ.neighborSet v)] [Fintype V] :
Gᶜ.degree v = Fintype.card V - 1 - G.degree v := by
classical
rw [← card_neighborSet_union_compl_neighborSet G v, Set.toFinset_union]
simp [card_union_of_disjoint (Set.disjoint_toFinset.mpr (compl_neighborSet_disjoint G v))]
instance incidenceSetFintype [DecidableEq V] : Fintype (G.incidenceSet v) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv (G.neighborSet v) (G.incidenceSetEquivNeighborSet v).symm
/-- This is the `Finset` version of `incidenceSet`. -/
def incidenceFinset [DecidableEq V] : Finset (Sym2 V) :=
(G.incidenceSet v).toFinset
@[simp]
theorem card_incidenceSet_eq_degree [DecidableEq V] :
Fintype.card (G.incidenceSet v) = G.degree v := by
rw [Fintype.card_congr (G.incidenceSetEquivNeighborSet v)]
simp
@[simp]
theorem card_incidenceFinset_eq_degree [DecidableEq V] : #(G.incidenceFinset v) = G.degree v := by
rw [← G.card_incidenceSet_eq_degree]
apply Set.toFinset_card
@[simp]
theorem mem_incidenceFinset [DecidableEq V] (e : Sym2 V) :
e ∈ G.incidenceFinset v ↔ e ∈ G.incidenceSet v :=
Set.mem_toFinset
theorem incidenceFinset_eq_filter [DecidableEq V] [Fintype G.edgeSet] :
G.incidenceFinset v = {e ∈ G.edgeFinset | v ∈ e} := by
ext e
induction e
simp [mk'_mem_incidenceSet_iff]
variable {G v}
/-- If `G ≤ H` then `G.degree v ≤ H.degree v` for any vertex `v`. -/
lemma degree_le_of_le {H : SimpleGraph V} [Fintype (H.neighborSet v)] (hle : G ≤ H) :
G.degree v ≤ H.degree v := by
simp_rw [← card_neighborSet_eq_degree]
exact Set.card_le_card fun v hv => hle hv
end FiniteAt
section LocallyFinite
/-- A graph is locally finite if every vertex has a finite neighbor set. -/
abbrev LocallyFinite :=
∀ v : V, Fintype (G.neighborSet v)
variable [LocallyFinite G]
/-- A locally finite simple graph is regular of degree `d` if every vertex has degree `d`. -/
def IsRegularOfDegree (d : ℕ) : Prop :=
∀ v : V, G.degree v = d
variable {G}
theorem IsRegularOfDegree.degree_eq {d : ℕ} (h : G.IsRegularOfDegree d) (v : V) : G.degree v = d :=
h v
theorem IsRegularOfDegree.compl [Fintype V] [DecidableEq V] {G : SimpleGraph V} [DecidableRel G.Adj]
{k : ℕ} (h : G.IsRegularOfDegree k) : Gᶜ.IsRegularOfDegree (Fintype.card V - 1 - k) := by
intro v
rw [degree_compl, h v]
end LocallyFinite
section Finite
variable [Fintype V]
instance neighborSetFintype [DecidableRel G.Adj] (v : V) : Fintype (G.neighborSet v) :=
@Subtype.fintype _ (· ∈ G.neighborSet v)
(by
simp_rw [mem_neighborSet]
infer_instance)
_
theorem neighborFinset_eq_filter {v : V} [DecidableRel G.Adj] :
G.neighborFinset v = ({w | G.Adj v w} : Finset _) := by ext; simp
theorem neighborFinset_compl [DecidableEq V] [DecidableRel G.Adj] (v : V) :
Gᶜ.neighborFinset v = (G.neighborFinset v)ᶜ \ {v} := by
simp only [neighborFinset, neighborSet_compl, Set.toFinset_diff, Set.toFinset_compl,
Set.toFinset_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem complete_graph_degree [DecidableEq V] (v : V) :
(⊤ : SimpleGraph V).degree v = Fintype.card V - 1 := by
simp_rw [degree, neighborFinset_eq_filter, top_adj, filter_ne]
rw [card_erase_of_mem (mem_univ v), card_univ]
theorem bot_degree (v : V) : (⊥ : SimpleGraph V).degree v = 0 := by
simp_rw [degree, neighborFinset_eq_filter, bot_adj, filter_False]
exact Finset.card_empty
theorem IsRegularOfDegree.top [DecidableEq V] :
(⊤ : SimpleGraph V).IsRegularOfDegree (Fintype.card V - 1) := by
intro v
simp
/-- The minimum degree of all vertices (and `0` if there are no vertices).
The key properties of this are given in `exists_minimal_degree_vertex`, `minDegree_le_degree`
and `le_minDegree_of_forall_le_degree`. -/
def minDegree [DecidableRel G.Adj] : ℕ :=
WithTop.untopD 0 (univ.image fun v => G.degree v).min
/-- There exists a vertex of minimal degree. Note the assumption of being nonempty is necessary, as
the lemma implies there exists a vertex. -/
theorem exists_minimal_degree_vertex [DecidableRel G.Adj] [Nonempty V] :
∃ v, G.minDegree = G.degree v := by
obtain ⟨t, ht : _ = _⟩ := min_of_nonempty (univ_nonempty.image fun v => G.degree v)
obtain ⟨v, _, rfl⟩ := mem_image.mp (mem_of_min ht)
exact ⟨v, by simp [minDegree, ht]⟩
/-- The minimum degree in the graph is at most the degree of any particular vertex. -/
theorem minDegree_le_degree [DecidableRel G.Adj] (v : V) : G.minDegree ≤ G.degree v := by
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := Finset.min_of_mem (mem_image_of_mem (fun v => G.degree v) (mem_univ v))
have := Finset.min_le_of_eq (mem_image_of_mem _ (mem_univ v)) ht
rwa [minDegree, ht]
/-- In a nonempty graph, if `k` is at most the degree of every vertex, it is at most the minimum
degree. Note the assumption that the graph is nonempty is necessary as long as `G.minDegree` is
defined to be a natural. -/
theorem le_minDegree_of_forall_le_degree [DecidableRel G.Adj] [Nonempty V] (k : ℕ)
(h : ∀ v, k ≤ G.degree v) : k ≤ G.minDegree := by
rcases G.exists_minimal_degree_vertex with ⟨v, hv⟩
rw [hv]
apply h
/-- If there are no vertices then the `minDegree` is zero. -/
@[simp]
lemma minDegree_of_isEmpty [DecidableRel G.Adj] [IsEmpty V] : G.minDegree = 0 := by
rw [minDegree, WithTop.untopD_eq_self_iff]
simp
variable {G} in
/-- If `G` is a subgraph of `H` then `G.minDegree ≤ H.minDegree`. -/
lemma minDegree_le_minDegree {H : SimpleGraph V} [DecidableRel G.Adj] [DecidableRel H.Adj]
(hle : G ≤ H) : G.minDegree ≤ H.minDegree := by
by_cases hne : Nonempty V
· apply le_minDegree_of_forall_le_degree
exact fun v ↦ (G.minDegree_le_degree v).trans (G.degree_le_of_le hle)
· rw [not_nonempty_iff] at hne
simp
/-- The maximum degree of all vertices (and `0` if there are no vertices).
The key properties of this are given in `exists_maximal_degree_vertex`, `degree_le_maxDegree`
and `maxDegree_le_of_forall_degree_le`. -/
def maxDegree [DecidableRel G.Adj] : ℕ :=
Option.getD (univ.image fun v => G.degree v).max 0
/-- There exists a vertex of maximal degree. Note the assumption of being nonempty is necessary, as
the lemma implies there exists a vertex. -/
theorem exists_maximal_degree_vertex [DecidableRel G.Adj] [Nonempty V] :
∃ v, G.maxDegree = G.degree v := by
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := max_of_nonempty (univ_nonempty.image fun v => G.degree v)
have ht₂ := mem_of_max ht
simp only [mem_image, mem_univ, exists_prop_of_true] at ht₂
rcases ht₂ with ⟨v, _, rfl⟩
refine ⟨v, ?_⟩
rw [maxDegree, ht]
rfl
/-- The maximum degree in the graph is at least the degree of any particular vertex. -/
| theorem degree_le_maxDegree [DecidableRel G.Adj] (v : V) : G.degree v ≤ G.maxDegree := by
obtain ⟨t, ht : _ = _⟩ := Finset.max_of_mem (mem_image_of_mem (fun v => G.degree v) (mem_univ v))
have := Finset.le_max_of_eq (mem_image_of_mem _ (mem_univ v)) ht
rwa [maxDegree, ht]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Finite.lean | 351 | 354 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Angle
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse
/-!
# The argument of a complex number.
We define `arg : ℂ → ℝ`, returning a real number in the range (-π, π],
such that for `x ≠ 0`, `sin (arg x) = x.im / x.abs` and `cos (arg x) = x.re / x.abs`,
while `arg 0` defaults to `0`
-/
open Filter Metric Set
open scoped ComplexConjugate Real Topology
namespace Complex
variable {a x z : ℂ}
/-- `arg` returns values in the range (-π, π], such that for `x ≠ 0`,
`sin (arg x) = x.im / x.abs` and `cos (arg x) = x.re / x.abs`,
`arg 0` defaults to `0` -/
noncomputable def arg (x : ℂ) : ℝ :=
if 0 ≤ x.re then Real.arcsin (x.im / ‖x‖)
else if 0 ≤ x.im then Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) + π else Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) - π
theorem sin_arg (x : ℂ) : Real.sin (arg x) = x.im / ‖x‖ := by
unfold arg; split_ifs <;>
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, arg, Real.sin_arcsin (abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_norm_le_one x)).1
(abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_norm_le_one x)).2, Real.sin_add, neg_div, Real.arcsin_neg, Real.sin_neg]
theorem cos_arg {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Real.cos (arg x) = x.re / ‖x‖ := by
rw [arg]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· rw [Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_sq, (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx).le, *]
· rw [Real.cos_add_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
· rw [Real.cos_sub_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
@[simp]
theorem norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * exp (arg x * I) = x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
· have : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr hx
apply Complex.ext <;> field_simp [sin_arg, cos_arg hx, this, mul_comm ‖x‖]
@[simp]
theorem norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (x : ℂ) : (‖x‖ * (cos (arg x) + sin (arg x) * I) : ℂ) = x := by
rw [← exp_mul_I, norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I]
@[simp]
lemma norm_mul_cos_arg (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * Real.cos (arg x) = x.re := by
simpa [-norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg re (norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
@[simp]
lemma norm_mul_sin_arg (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * Real.sin (arg x) = x.im := by
simpa [-norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg im (norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
theorem norm_eq_one_iff (z : ℂ) : ‖z‖ = 1 ↔ ∃ θ : ℝ, exp (θ * I) = z := by
refine ⟨fun hz => ⟨arg z, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· calc
exp (arg z * I) = ‖z‖ * exp (arg z * I) := by rw [hz, ofReal_one, one_mul]
_ = z :=norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I z
· rintro ⟨θ, rfl⟩
exact Complex.norm_exp_ofReal_mul_I θ
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I := norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I := norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_cos_arg := norm_mul_cos_arg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_sin_arg := norm_mul_sin_arg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_eq_one_iff := norm_eq_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem range_exp_mul_I : (Set.range fun x : ℝ => exp (x * I)) = Metric.sphere 0 1 := by
ext x
simp only [mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm, norm_eq_one_iff, Set.mem_range]
theorem arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) {θ : ℝ} (hθ : θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π) :
arg (r * (cos θ + sin θ * I)) = θ := by
simp only [arg, norm_mul, norm_cos_add_sin_mul_I, Complex.norm_of_nonneg hr.le, mul_one]
simp only [re_ofReal_mul, im_ofReal_mul, neg_im, ← ofReal_cos, ← ofReal_sin, ←
mk_eq_add_mul_I, neg_div, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ hr.ne', mul_nonneg_iff_right_nonneg_of_pos hr]
by_cases h₁ : θ ∈ Set.Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)
· rw [if_pos]
exacts [Real.arcsin_sin' h₁, Real.cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc h₁]
· rw [Set.mem_Icc, not_and_or, not_le, not_le] at h₁
rcases h₁ with h₁ | h₁
· replace hθ := hθ.1
have hcos : Real.cos θ < 0 := by
rw [← neg_pos, ← Real.cos_add_pi]
refine Real.cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> linarith
have hsin : Real.sin θ < 0 := Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt (by linarith) hθ
rw [if_neg, if_neg, ← Real.sin_add_pi, Real.arcsin_sin, add_sub_cancel_right] <;> [linarith;
linarith; exact hsin.not_le; exact hcos.not_le]
· replace hθ := hθ.2
have hcos : Real.cos θ < 0 := Real.cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt h₁ (by linarith)
have hsin : 0 ≤ Real.sin θ := Real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith, hθ⟩
rw [if_neg, if_pos, ← Real.sin_sub_pi, Real.arcsin_sin, sub_add_cancel] <;> [linarith;
linarith; exact hsin; exact hcos.not_le]
theorem arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I {θ : ℝ} (hθ : θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π) : arg (cos θ + sin θ * I) = θ := by
rw [← one_mul (_ + _), ← ofReal_one, arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I zero_lt_one hθ]
lemma arg_exp_mul_I (θ : ℝ) :
arg (exp (θ * I)) = toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ := by
convert arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I (θ := toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ) _ using 2
· rw [← exp_mul_I, eq_sub_of_add_eq <| toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul _ _ θ, ofReal_sub,
ofReal_zsmul, ofReal_mul, ofReal_ofNat, exp_mul_I_periodic.sub_zsmul_eq]
· convert toIocMod_mem_Ioc _ _ _
ring
@[simp]
theorem arg_zero : arg 0 = 0 := by simp [arg, le_refl]
theorem ext_norm_arg {x y : ℂ} (h₁ : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) (h₂ : x.arg = y.arg) : x = y := by
rw [← norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I x, ← norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I y, h₁, h₂]
theorem ext_norm_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} : x = y ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ ∧ arg x = arg y :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, and_imp.2 ext_norm_arg⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias ext_abs_arg := ext_norm_arg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias ext_abs_arg_iff := ext_norm_arg_iff
theorem arg_mem_Ioc (z : ℂ) : arg z ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
have hπ : 0 < π := Real.pi_pos
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | hz)
· simp [hπ, hπ.le]
rcases existsUnique_add_zsmul_mem_Ioc Real.two_pi_pos (arg z) (-π) with ⟨N, hN, -⟩
rw [two_mul, neg_add_cancel_left, ← two_mul, zsmul_eq_mul] at hN
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, ← cos_add_int_mul_two_pi _ N, ← sin_add_int_mul_two_pi _ N]
have := arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (norm_pos_iff.mpr hz) hN
push_cast at this
rwa [this]
@[simp]
theorem range_arg : Set.range arg = Set.Ioc (-π) π :=
(Set.range_subset_iff.2 arg_mem_Ioc).antisymm fun _ hx => ⟨_, arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I hx⟩
theorem arg_le_pi (x : ℂ) : arg x ≤ π :=
(arg_mem_Ioc x).2
theorem neg_pi_lt_arg (x : ℂ) : -π < arg x :=
(arg_mem_Ioc x).1
theorem abs_arg_le_pi (z : ℂ) : |arg z| ≤ π :=
abs_le.2 ⟨(neg_pi_lt_arg z).le, arg_le_pi z⟩
@[simp]
theorem arg_nonneg_iff {z : ℂ} : 0 ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ z.im := by
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | h₀); · simp
calc
0 ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ Real.sin (arg z) :=
⟨fun h => Real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨h, arg_le_pi z⟩, by
contrapose!
intro h
exact Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt h (neg_pi_lt_arg _)⟩
_ ↔ _ := by rw [sin_arg, le_div_iff₀ (norm_pos_iff.mpr h₀), zero_mul]
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < 0 ↔ z.im < 0 :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le arg_nonneg_iff
theorem arg_real_mul (x : ℂ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : arg (r * x) = arg x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx); · rw [mul_zero]
conv_lhs =>
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x, ← mul_assoc, ← ofReal_mul,
arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (mul_pos hr (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx)) x.arg_mem_Ioc]
theorem arg_mul_real {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (x : ℂ) : arg (x * r) = arg x :=
mul_comm x r ▸ arg_real_mul x hr
theorem arg_eq_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
arg x = arg y ↔ (‖y‖ / ‖x‖ : ℂ) * x = y := by
simp only [ext_norm_arg_iff, norm_mul, norm_div, norm_real, norm_norm,
div_mul_cancel₀ _ (norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr hx), eq_self_iff_true, true_and]
rw [← ofReal_div, arg_real_mul]
exact div_pos (norm_pos_iff.mpr hy) (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx)
@[simp] lemma arg_one : arg 1 = 0 := by simp [arg, zero_le_one]
/-- This holds true for all `x : ℂ` because of the junk values `0 / 0 = 0` and `arg 0 = 0`. -/
@[simp] lemma arg_div_self (x : ℂ) : arg (x / x) = 0 := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0 <;> simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_one : arg (-1) = π := by simp [arg, le_refl, not_le.2 (zero_lt_one' ℝ)]
@[simp]
theorem arg_I : arg I = π / 2 := by simp [arg, le_refl]
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_I : arg (-I) = -(π / 2) := by simp [arg, le_refl]
@[simp]
theorem tan_arg (x : ℂ) : Real.tan (arg x) = x.im / x.re := by
by_cases h : x = 0
· simp only [h, zero_div, Complex.zero_im, Complex.arg_zero, Real.tan_zero, Complex.zero_re]
rw [Real.tan_eq_sin_div_cos, sin_arg, cos_arg h,
div_div_div_cancel_right₀ (norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr h)]
theorem arg_ofReal_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : arg x = 0 := by simp [arg, hx]
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma natCast_arg {n : ℕ} : arg n = 0 :=
ofReal_natCast n ▸ arg_ofReal_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg
@[simp]
lemma ofNat_arg {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] : arg ofNat(n) = 0 :=
natCast_arg
theorem arg_eq_zero_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = 0 ↔ 0 ≤ z.re ∧ z.im = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [norm_nonneg]
· obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
rintro ⟨h, rfl : y = 0⟩
exact arg_ofReal_of_nonneg h
open ComplexOrder in
lemma arg_eq_zero_iff_zero_le {z : ℂ} : arg z = 0 ↔ 0 ≤ z := by
rw [arg_eq_zero_iff, eq_comm, nonneg_iff]
theorem arg_eq_pi_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = π ↔ z.re < 0 ∧ z.im = 0 := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0
· simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_ne_zero.symm]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
rintro ⟨h : x < 0, rfl : y = 0⟩
rw [← arg_neg_one, ← arg_real_mul (-1) (neg_pos.2 h)]
simp [← ofReal_def]
open ComplexOrder in
lemma arg_eq_pi_iff_lt_zero {z : ℂ} : arg z = π ↔ z < 0 := arg_eq_pi_iff
theorem arg_lt_pi_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < π ↔ 0 ≤ z.re ∨ z.im ≠ 0 := by
rw [(arg_le_pi z).lt_iff_ne, not_iff_comm, not_or, not_le, Classical.not_not, arg_eq_pi_iff]
theorem arg_ofReal_of_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x < 0) : arg x = π :=
arg_eq_pi_iff.2 ⟨hx, rfl⟩
theorem arg_eq_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = π / 2 ↔ z.re = 0 ∧ 0 < z.im := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0; · simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_div_two_pos.ne]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
rintro ⟨rfl : x = 0, hy : 0 < y⟩
rw [← arg_I, ← arg_real_mul I hy, ofReal_mul', I_re, I_im, mul_zero, mul_one]
theorem arg_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = -(π / 2) ↔ z.re = 0 ∧ z.im < 0 := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0; · simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_ne_zero]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
rintro ⟨rfl : x = 0, hy : y < 0⟩
rw [← arg_neg_I, ← arg_real_mul (-I) (neg_pos.2 hy), mk_eq_add_mul_I]
simp
theorem arg_of_re_nonneg {x : ℂ} (hx : 0 ≤ x.re) : arg x = Real.arcsin (x.im / ‖x‖) :=
if_pos hx
theorem arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg {x : ℂ} (hx_re : x.re < 0) (hx_im : 0 ≤ x.im) :
arg x = Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) + π := by
simp only [arg, hx_re.not_le, hx_im, if_true, if_false]
theorem arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg {x : ℂ} (hx_re : x.re < 0) (hx_im : x.im < 0) :
arg x = Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) - π := by
simp only [arg, hx_re.not_le, hx_im.not_le, if_false]
theorem arg_of_im_nonneg_of_ne_zero {z : ℂ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ z.im) (h₂ : z ≠ 0) :
arg z = Real.arccos (z.re / ‖z‖) := by
rw [← cos_arg h₂, Real.arccos_cos (arg_nonneg_iff.2 h₁) (arg_le_pi _)]
theorem arg_of_im_pos {z : ℂ} (hz : 0 < z.im) : arg z = Real.arccos (z.re / ‖z‖) :=
arg_of_im_nonneg_of_ne_zero hz.le fun h => hz.ne' <| h.symm ▸ rfl
theorem arg_of_im_neg {z : ℂ} (hz : z.im < 0) : arg z = -Real.arccos (z.re / ‖z‖) := by
have h₀ : z ≠ 0 := mt (congr_arg im) hz.ne
rw [← cos_arg h₀, ← Real.cos_neg, Real.arccos_cos, neg_neg]
exacts [neg_nonneg.2 (arg_neg_iff.2 hz).le, neg_le.2 (neg_pi_lt_arg z).le]
theorem arg_conj (x : ℂ) : arg (conj x) = if arg x = π then π else -arg x := by
simp_rw [arg_eq_pi_iff, arg, neg_im, conj_im, conj_re, norm_conj, neg_div, neg_neg,
Real.arcsin_neg]
rcases lt_trichotomy x.re 0 with (hr | hr | hr) <;>
rcases lt_trichotomy x.im 0 with (hi | hi | hi)
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi.le, hi.ne, not_le.2 hi, add_comm]
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi]
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi.ne.symm, hi.le, not_le.2 hi, sub_eq_neg_add]
· simp [hr]
· simp [hr]
· simp [hr]
· simp [hr, hr.le, hi.ne]
· simp [hr, hr.le, hr.le.not_lt]
· simp [hr, hr.le, hr.le.not_lt]
theorem arg_inv (x : ℂ) : arg x⁻¹ = if arg x = π then π else -arg x := by
rw [← arg_conj, inv_def, mul_comm]
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· exact arg_real_mul (conj x) (by simp [hx])
@[simp] lemma abs_arg_inv (x : ℂ) : |x⁻¹.arg| = |x.arg| := by rw [arg_inv]; split_ifs <;> simp [*]
-- TODO: Replace the next two lemmas by general facts about periodic functions
lemma norm_eq_one_iff' : ‖x‖ = 1 ↔ ∃ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π, exp (θ * I) = x := by
rw [norm_eq_one_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨θ, rfl⟩
refine ⟨toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ, ?_, ?_⟩
· convert toIocMod_mem_Ioc _ _ _
ring
· rw [eq_sub_of_add_eq <| toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul _ _ θ, ofReal_sub,
ofReal_zsmul, ofReal_mul, ofReal_ofNat, exp_mul_I_periodic.sub_zsmul_eq]
· rintro ⟨θ, _, rfl⟩
exact ⟨θ, rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_eq_one_iff' := norm_eq_one_iff'
lemma image_exp_Ioc_eq_sphere : (fun θ : ℝ ↦ exp (θ * I)) '' Set.Ioc (-π) π = sphere 0 1 := by
ext; simpa using norm_eq_one_iff'.symm
theorem arg_le_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z ≤ π / 2 ↔ 0 ≤ re z ∨ im z < 0 := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 (re z) with hre | hre
· simp only [hre, arg_of_re_nonneg hre, Real.arcsin_le_pi_div_two, true_or]
simp only [hre.not_le, false_or]
rcases le_or_lt 0 (im z) with him | him
· simp only [him.not_lt]
rw [iff_false, not_le, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg hre him, ← sub_lt_iff_lt_add, half_sub,
Real.neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin, neg_im, neg_div, neg_lt_neg_iff, div_lt_one, ←
abs_of_nonneg him, abs_im_lt_norm]
exacts [hre.ne, norm_pos_iff.mpr <| ne_of_apply_ne re hre.ne]
· simp only [him]
rw [iff_true, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg hre him]
exact (sub_le_self _ Real.pi_pos.le).trans (Real.arcsin_le_pi_div_two _)
theorem neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff {z : ℂ} : -(π / 2) ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ re z ∨ 0 ≤ im z := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 (re z) with hre | hre
· simp only [hre, arg_of_re_nonneg hre, Real.neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin, true_or]
simp only [hre.not_le, false_or]
rcases le_or_lt 0 (im z) with him | him
· simp only [him]
rw [iff_true, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg hre him]
exact (Real.neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _).trans (le_add_of_nonneg_right Real.pi_pos.le)
· simp only [him.not_le]
rw [iff_false, not_le, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg hre him, sub_lt_iff_lt_add', ←
sub_eq_add_neg, sub_half, Real.arcsin_lt_pi_div_two, div_lt_one, neg_im, ← abs_of_neg him,
abs_im_lt_norm]
exacts [hre.ne, norm_pos_iff.mpr <| ne_of_apply_ne re hre.ne]
lemma neg_pi_div_two_lt_arg_iff {z : ℂ} : -(π / 2) < arg z ↔ 0 < re z ∨ 0 ≤ im z := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff, ne_comm, Ne, arg_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff]
rcases lt_trichotomy z.re 0 with hre | hre | hre
· simp [hre.ne, hre.not_le, hre.not_lt]
· simp [hre]
· simp [hre, hre.le, hre.ne']
lemma arg_lt_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < π / 2 ↔ 0 < re z ∨ im z < 0 ∨ z = 0 := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, arg_le_pi_div_two_iff, Ne, arg_eq_pi_div_two_iff]
rcases lt_trichotomy z.re 0 with hre | hre | hre
· have : z ≠ 0 := by simp [Complex.ext_iff, hre.ne]
simp [hre.ne, hre.not_le, hre.not_lt, this]
· have : z = 0 ↔ z.im = 0 := by simp [Complex.ext_iff, hre]
simp [hre, this, or_comm, le_iff_eq_or_lt]
· simp [hre, hre.le, hre.ne']
@[simp]
theorem abs_arg_le_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : |arg z| ≤ π / 2 ↔ 0 ≤ re z := by
rw [abs_le, arg_le_pi_div_two_iff, neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff, ← or_and_left, ← not_le,
and_not_self_iff, or_false]
@[simp]
theorem abs_arg_lt_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : |arg z| < π / 2 ↔ 0 < re z ∨ z = 0 := by
rw [abs_lt, arg_lt_pi_div_two_iff, neg_pi_div_two_lt_arg_iff, ← or_and_left]
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with hz | hz
· simp [hz]
· simp_rw [hz, or_false, ← not_lt, not_and_self_iff, or_false]
@[simp]
theorem arg_conj_coe_angle (x : ℂ) : (arg (conj x) : Real.Angle) = -arg x := by
by_cases h : arg x = π <;> simp [arg_conj, h]
@[simp]
theorem arg_inv_coe_angle (x : ℂ) : (arg x⁻¹ : Real.Angle) = -arg x := by
by_cases h : arg x = π <;> simp [arg_inv, h]
theorem arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos {x : ℂ} (hi : 0 < x.im) : arg (-x) = arg x - π := by
rw [arg_of_im_pos hi, arg_of_im_neg (show (-x).im < 0 from Left.neg_neg_iff.2 hi)]
simp [neg_div, Real.arccos_neg]
theorem arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg {x : ℂ} (hi : x.im < 0) : arg (-x) = arg x + π := by
rw [arg_of_im_neg hi, arg_of_im_pos (show 0 < (-x).im from Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hi)]
simp [neg_div, Real.arccos_neg, add_comm, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_iff {x : ℂ} :
arg (-x) = arg x - π ↔ 0 < x.im ∨ x.im = 0 ∧ x.re < 0 := by
rcases lt_trichotomy x.im 0 with (hi | hi | hi)
· simp [hi, hi.ne, hi.not_lt, arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, ←
add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, Real.pi_ne_zero]
· rw [(ext rfl hi : x = x.re)]
rcases lt_trichotomy x.re 0 with (hr | hr | hr)
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_neg hr, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_nonneg (Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hr).le]
simp [hr]
· simp [hr, hi, Real.pi_ne_zero]
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hr.le, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_neg (Left.neg_neg_iff.2 hr)]
simp [hr.not_lt, ← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, Real.pi_ne_zero]
· simp [hi, arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos]
theorem arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_iff {x : ℂ} :
arg (-x) = arg x + π ↔ x.im < 0 ∨ x.im = 0 ∧ 0 < x.re := by
rcases lt_trichotomy x.im 0 with (hi | hi | hi)
· simp [hi, arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg]
· rw [(ext rfl hi : x = x.re)]
rcases lt_trichotomy x.re 0 with (hr | hr | hr)
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_neg hr, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_nonneg (Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hr).le]
simp [hr.not_lt, ← two_mul, Real.pi_ne_zero]
· simp [hr, hi, Real.pi_ne_zero.symm]
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hr.le, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_neg (Left.neg_neg_iff.2 hr)]
simp [hr]
· simp [hi, hi.ne.symm, hi.not_lt, arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos, sub_eq_add_neg, ←
add_eq_zero_iff_neg_eq, Real.pi_ne_zero]
theorem arg_neg_coe_angle {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : (arg (-x) : Real.Angle) = arg x + π := by
rcases lt_trichotomy x.im 0 with (hi | hi | hi)
· rw [arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg hi, Real.Angle.coe_add]
· rw [(ext rfl hi : x = x.re)]
rcases lt_trichotomy x.re 0 with (hr | hr | hr)
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_neg hr, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_nonneg (Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hr).le, ←
Real.Angle.coe_add, ← two_mul, Real.Angle.coe_two_pi, Real.Angle.coe_zero]
· exact False.elim (hx (ext hr hi))
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hr.le, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_neg (Left.neg_neg_iff.2 hr),
Real.Angle.coe_zero, zero_add]
· rw [arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos hi, Real.Angle.coe_sub, Real.Angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi]
theorem arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_eq_toIocMod {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (θ : ℝ) :
arg (r * (cos θ + sin θ * I)) = toIocMod Real.two_pi_pos (-π) θ := by
have hi : toIocMod Real.two_pi_pos (-π) θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
convert toIocMod_mem_Ioc _ _ θ
ring
convert arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I hr hi using 3
simp [toIocMod, cos_sub_int_mul_two_pi, sin_sub_int_mul_two_pi]
theorem arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_eq_toIocMod (θ : ℝ) :
arg (cos θ + sin θ * I) = toIocMod Real.two_pi_pos (-π) θ := by
rw [← one_mul (_ + _), ← ofReal_one, arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_eq_toIocMod zero_lt_one]
theorem arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_sub {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (θ : ℝ) :
arg (r * (cos θ + sin θ * I)) - θ = 2 * π * ⌊(π - θ) / (2 * π)⌋ := by
rw [arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_eq_toIocMod hr, toIocMod_sub_self, toIocDiv_eq_neg_floor,
zsmul_eq_mul]
ring_nf
theorem arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_sub (θ : ℝ) :
arg (cos θ + sin θ * I) - θ = 2 * π * ⌊(π - θ) / (2 * π)⌋ := by
rw [← one_mul (_ + _), ← ofReal_one, arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_sub zero_lt_one]
theorem arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (θ : Real.Angle) :
(arg (r * (Real.Angle.cos θ + Real.Angle.sin θ * I)) : Real.Angle) = θ := by
induction' θ using Real.Angle.induction_on with θ
rw [Real.Angle.cos_coe, Real.Angle.sin_coe, Real.Angle.angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
use ⌊(π - θ) / (2 * π)⌋
exact mod_cast arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_sub hr θ
theorem arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle (θ : Real.Angle) :
(arg (Real.Angle.cos θ + Real.Angle.sin θ * I) : Real.Angle) = θ := by
rw [← one_mul (_ + _), ← ofReal_one, arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle zero_lt_one]
theorem arg_mul_coe_angle {x y : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
(arg (x * y) : Real.Angle) = arg x + arg y := by
convert arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle (mul_pos (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx) (norm_pos_iff.mpr hy))
(arg x + arg y : Real.Angle) using 3
simp_rw [← Real.Angle.coe_add, Real.Angle.sin_coe, Real.Angle.cos_coe, ofReal_cos, ofReal_sin,
cos_add_sin_I, ofReal_add, add_mul, exp_add, ofReal_mul]
rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm (exp _), ← mul_assoc (‖y‖ : ℂ), norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I, mul_comm y, ←
mul_assoc, norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I]
theorem arg_div_coe_angle {x y : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
(arg (x / y) : Real.Angle) = arg x - arg y := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, arg_mul_coe_angle hx (inv_ne_zero hy), arg_inv_coe_angle, sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem arg_pow_coe_angle (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) :
(arg (x ^ n) : Real.Angle) = n • (arg x : Real.Angle) := by
obtain rfl | x0 := eq_or_ne x 0
· by_cases n0 : n = 0 <;> simp [n0]
· induction n with
| zero => simp [x0]
| succ n ih => rw [pow_succ, arg_mul_coe_angle (pow_ne_zero n x0) x0, ih, succ_nsmul]
theorem arg_zpow_coe_angle (x : ℂ) (n : ℤ) :
(arg (x ^ n) : Real.Angle) = n • (arg x : Real.Angle) := by
match n with
| Int.ofNat m => simp [arg_pow_coe_angle]
| Int.negSucc m => simp [arg_pow_coe_angle]
@[simp]
theorem arg_coe_angle_toReal_eq_arg (z : ℂ) : (arg z : Real.Angle).toReal = arg z := by
rw [Real.Angle.toReal_coe_eq_self_iff_mem_Ioc]
exact arg_mem_Ioc _
|
theorem arg_coe_angle_eq_iff_eq_toReal {z : ℂ} {θ : Real.Angle} :
(arg z : Real.Angle) = θ ↔ arg z = θ.toReal := by
rw [← Real.Angle.toReal_inj, arg_coe_angle_toReal_eq_arg]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Complex/Arg.lean | 512 | 516 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Exposed
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.HahnBanach.Separation
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.ContinuousAffineMap
/-!
# The Krein-Milman theorem
This file proves the Krein-Milman lemma and the Krein-Milman theorem.
## The lemma
The lemma states that a nonempty compact set `s` has an extreme point. The proof goes:
1. Using Zorn's lemma, find a minimal nonempty closed `t` that is an extreme subset of `s`. We will
show that `t` is a singleton, thus corresponding to an extreme point.
2. By contradiction, `t` contains two distinct points `x` and `y`.
3. With the (geometric) Hahn-Banach theorem, find a hyperplane that separates `x` and `y`.
4. Look at the extreme (actually exposed) subset of `t` obtained by going the furthest away from
the separating hyperplane in the direction of `x`. It is nonempty, closed and an extreme subset
of `s`.
5. It is a strict subset of `t` (`y` isn't in it), so `t` isn't minimal. Absurd.
## The theorem
The theorem states that a compact convex set `s` is the closure of the convex hull of its extreme
points. It is an almost immediate strengthening of the lemma. The proof goes:
1. By contradiction, `s \ closure (convexHull ℝ (extremePoints ℝ s))` is nonempty, say with `x`.
2. With the (geometric) Hahn-Banach theorem, find a hyperplane that separates `x` from
`closure (convexHull ℝ (extremePoints ℝ s))`.
3. Look at the extreme (actually exposed) subset of
`s \ closure (convexHull ℝ (extremePoints ℝ s))` obtained by going the furthest away from the
separating hyperplane. It is nonempty by assumption of nonemptiness and compactness, so by the
lemma it has an extreme point.
4. This point is also an extreme point of `s`. Absurd.
## Related theorems
When the space is finite dimensional, the `closure` can be dropped to strengthen the result of the
Krein-Milman theorem. This leads to the Minkowski-Carathéodory theorem (currently not in mathlib).
Birkhoff's theorem is the Minkowski-Carathéodory theorem applied to the set of bistochastic
matrices, permutation matrices being the extreme points.
## References
See chapter 8 of [Barry Simon, *Convexity*][simon2011]
-/
open Set
variable {E F : Type*} [AddCommGroup E] [Module ℝ E] [TopologicalSpace E] [T2Space E]
[IsTopologicalAddGroup E] [ContinuousSMul ℝ E] [LocallyConvexSpace ℝ E] {s : Set E}
[AddCommGroup F] [Module ℝ F] [TopologicalSpace F] [T1Space F]
/-- **Krein-Milman lemma**: In a LCTVS, any nonempty compact set has an extreme point. -/
theorem IsCompact.extremePoints_nonempty (hscomp : IsCompact s) (hsnemp : s.Nonempty) :
(s.extremePoints ℝ).Nonempty := by
let S : Set (Set E) := { t | t.Nonempty ∧ IsClosed t ∧ IsExtreme ℝ s t }
rsuffices ⟨t, ht⟩ : ∃ t, Minimal (· ∈ S) t
· obtain ⟨⟨x,hxt⟩, htclos, hst⟩ := ht.prop
refine ⟨x, IsExtreme.mem_extremePoints ?_⟩
rwa [← eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem.2 ⟨hxt, fun y hyB => ?_⟩]
by_contra hyx
obtain ⟨l, hl⟩ := geometric_hahn_banach_point_point hyx
obtain ⟨z, hzt, hz⟩ :=
(hscomp.of_isClosed_subset htclos hst.1).exists_isMaxOn ⟨x, hxt⟩
l.continuous.continuousOn
have h : IsExposed ℝ t ({ z ∈ t | ∀ w ∈ t, l w ≤ l z }) := fun _ => ⟨l, rfl⟩
rw [ht.eq_of_ge (y := ({ z ∈ t | ∀ w ∈ t, l w ≤ l z }))
⟨⟨z, hzt, hz⟩, h.isClosed htclos, hst.trans h.isExtreme⟩ (t.sep_subset _)] at hyB
exact hl.not_le (hyB.2 x hxt)
refine zorn_superset _ fun F hFS hF => ?_
obtain rfl | hFnemp := F.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· exact ⟨s, ⟨hsnemp, hscomp.isClosed, IsExtreme.rfl⟩, fun _ => False.elim⟩
refine ⟨⋂₀ F, ⟨?_, isClosed_sInter fun t ht => (hFS ht).2.1,
isExtreme_sInter hFnemp fun t ht => (hFS ht).2.2⟩, fun t ht => sInter_subset_of_mem ht⟩
haveI : Nonempty (↥F) := hFnemp.to_subtype
rw [sInter_eq_iInter]
refine IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed _ (fun t u => ?_)
(fun t => (hFS t.mem).1)
(fun t => hscomp.of_isClosed_subset (hFS t.mem).2.1 (hFS t.mem).2.2.1) fun t =>
(hFS t.mem).2.1
obtain htu | hut := hF.total t.mem u.mem
exacts [⟨t, Subset.rfl, htu⟩, ⟨u, hut, Subset.rfl⟩]
/-- **Krein-Milman theorem**: In a LCTVS, any compact convex set is the closure of the convex hull
of its extreme points. -/
theorem closure_convexHull_extremePoints (hscomp : IsCompact s) (hAconv : Convex ℝ s) :
closure (convexHull ℝ <| s.extremePoints ℝ) = s := by
apply (closure_minimal (convexHull_min extremePoints_subset hAconv) hscomp.isClosed).antisymm
| by_contra hs
obtain ⟨x, hxA, hxt⟩ := not_subset.1 hs
obtain ⟨l, r, hlr, hrx⟩ :=
geometric_hahn_banach_closed_point (convex_convexHull _ _).closure isClosed_closure hxt
have h : IsExposed ℝ s ({ y ∈ s | ∀ z ∈ s, l z ≤ l y }) := fun _ => ⟨l, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨z, hzA, hz⟩ := hscomp.exists_isMaxOn ⟨x, hxA⟩ l.continuous.continuousOn
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := (h.isCompact hscomp).extremePoints_nonempty ⟨z, hzA, hz⟩
linarith [hlr _ (subset_closure <| subset_convexHull _ _ <|
h.isExtreme.extremePoints_subset_extremePoints hy), hy.1.2 x hxA]
/-- A continuous affine map is surjective from the extreme points of a compact set to the extreme
points of the image of that set. This inclusion is in general strict. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/KreinMilman.lean | 95 | 106 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.IsTerminal
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimits
/-!
# Initial and terminal objects in a category.
## References
* [Stacks: Initial and final objects](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/002B)
-/
noncomputable section
universe w w' v v₁ v₂ u u₁ u₂
open CategoryTheory
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C]
variable (C)
/-- A category has a terminal object if it has a limit over the empty diagram.
Use `hasTerminal_of_unique` to construct instances.
-/
abbrev HasTerminal :=
HasLimitsOfShape (Discrete.{0} PEmpty) C
/-- A category has an initial object if it has a colimit over the empty diagram.
Use `hasInitial_of_unique` to construct instances.
-/
abbrev HasInitial :=
HasColimitsOfShape (Discrete.{0} PEmpty) C
section Univ
variable (X : C) {F₁ : Discrete.{w} PEmpty ⥤ C} {F₂ : Discrete.{w'} PEmpty ⥤ C}
theorem hasTerminalChangeDiagram (h : HasLimit F₁) : HasLimit F₂ :=
⟨⟨⟨⟨limit F₁, by aesop_cat, by simp⟩,
isLimitChangeEmptyCone C (limit.isLimit F₁) _ (eqToIso rfl)⟩⟩⟩
theorem hasTerminalChangeUniverse [h : HasLimitsOfShape (Discrete.{w} PEmpty) C] :
HasLimitsOfShape (Discrete.{w'} PEmpty) C where
has_limit _ := hasTerminalChangeDiagram C (h.1 (Functor.empty C))
theorem hasInitialChangeDiagram (h : HasColimit F₁) : HasColimit F₂ :=
⟨⟨⟨⟨colimit F₁, by aesop_cat, by simp⟩,
isColimitChangeEmptyCocone C (colimit.isColimit F₁) _ (eqToIso rfl)⟩⟩⟩
theorem hasInitialChangeUniverse [h : HasColimitsOfShape (Discrete.{w} PEmpty) C] :
HasColimitsOfShape (Discrete.{w'} PEmpty) C where
has_colimit _ := hasInitialChangeDiagram C (h.1 (Functor.empty C))
end Univ
/-- An arbitrary choice of terminal object, if one exists.
You can use the notation `⊤_ C`.
This object is characterized by having a unique morphism from any object.
-/
abbrev terminal [HasTerminal C] : C :=
limit (Functor.empty.{0} C)
/-- An arbitrary choice of initial object, if one exists.
You can use the notation `⊥_ C`.
This object is characterized by having a unique morphism to any object.
-/
abbrev initial [HasInitial C] : C :=
colimit (Functor.empty.{0} C)
/-- Notation for the terminal object in `C` -/
notation "⊤_ " C:20 => terminal C
/-- Notation for the initial object in `C` -/
notation "⊥_ " C:20 => initial C
section
variable {C}
/-- We can more explicitly show that a category has a terminal object by specifying the object,
and showing there is a unique morphism to it from any other object. -/
theorem hasTerminal_of_unique (X : C) [∀ Y, Nonempty (Y ⟶ X)] [∀ Y, Subsingleton (Y ⟶ X)] :
HasTerminal C where
has_limit F := .mk ⟨_, (isTerminalEquivUnique F X).invFun fun _ ↦
⟨Classical.inhabited_of_nonempty', (Subsingleton.elim · _)⟩⟩
theorem IsTerminal.hasTerminal {X : C} (h : IsTerminal X) : HasTerminal C :=
{ has_limit := fun F => HasLimit.mk ⟨⟨X, by aesop_cat, by simp⟩,
isLimitChangeEmptyCone _ h _ (Iso.refl _)⟩ }
/-- We can more explicitly show that a category has an initial object by specifying the object,
and showing there is a unique morphism from it to any other object. -/
theorem hasInitial_of_unique (X : C) [∀ Y, Nonempty (X ⟶ Y)] [∀ Y, Subsingleton (X ⟶ Y)] :
HasInitial C where
has_colimit F := .mk ⟨_, (isInitialEquivUnique F X).invFun fun _ ↦
⟨Classical.inhabited_of_nonempty', (Subsingleton.elim · _)⟩⟩
theorem IsInitial.hasInitial {X : C} (h : IsInitial X) : HasInitial C where
has_colimit F :=
HasColimit.mk ⟨⟨X, by aesop_cat, by simp⟩, isColimitChangeEmptyCocone _ h _ (Iso.refl _)⟩
/-- The map from an object to the terminal object. -/
abbrev terminal.from [HasTerminal C] (P : C) : P ⟶ ⊤_ C :=
limit.lift (Functor.empty C) (asEmptyCone P)
/-- The map to an object from the initial object. -/
abbrev initial.to [HasInitial C] (P : C) : ⊥_ C ⟶ P :=
colimit.desc (Functor.empty C) (asEmptyCocone P)
/-- A terminal object is terminal. -/
def terminalIsTerminal [HasTerminal C] : IsTerminal (⊤_ C) where
lift _ := terminal.from _
/-- An initial object is initial. -/
def initialIsInitial [HasInitial C] : IsInitial (⊥_ C) where
desc _ := initial.to _
instance uniqueToTerminal [HasTerminal C] (P : C) : Unique (P ⟶ ⊤_ C) :=
isTerminalEquivUnique _ (⊤_ C) terminalIsTerminal P
instance uniqueFromInitial [HasInitial C] (P : C) : Unique (⊥_ C ⟶ P) :=
isInitialEquivUnique _ (⊥_ C) initialIsInitial P
@[ext] theorem terminal.hom_ext [HasTerminal C] {P : C} (f g : P ⟶ ⊤_ C) : f = g := by ext ⟨⟨⟩⟩
@[ext] theorem initial.hom_ext [HasInitial C] {P : C} (f g : ⊥_ C ⟶ P) : f = g := by ext ⟨⟨⟩⟩
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem terminal.comp_from [HasTerminal C] {P Q : C} (f : P ⟶ Q) :
f ≫ terminal.from Q = terminal.from P := by
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
-- `initial.to_comp_assoc` does not need the `simp` attribute.
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem initial.to_comp [HasInitial C] {P Q : C} (f : P ⟶ Q) : initial.to P ≫ f = initial.to Q := by
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
/-- The (unique) isomorphism between the chosen initial object and any other initial object. -/
@[simps!]
def initialIsoIsInitial [HasInitial C] {P : C} (t : IsInitial P) : ⊥_ C ≅ P :=
initialIsInitial.uniqueUpToIso t
/-- The (unique) isomorphism between the chosen terminal object and any other terminal object. -/
@[simps!]
def terminalIsoIsTerminal [HasTerminal C] {P : C} (t : IsTerminal P) : ⊤_ C ≅ P :=
terminalIsTerminal.uniqueUpToIso t
/-- Any morphism from a terminal object is split mono. -/
instance terminal.isSplitMono_from {Y : C} [HasTerminal C] (f : ⊤_ C ⟶ Y) : IsSplitMono f :=
IsTerminal.isSplitMono_from terminalIsTerminal _
/-- Any morphism to an initial object is split epi. -/
instance initial.isSplitEpi_to {Y : C} [HasInitial C] (f : Y ⟶ ⊥_ C) : IsSplitEpi f :=
IsInitial.isSplitEpi_to initialIsInitial _
instance hasInitial_op_of_hasTerminal [HasTerminal C] : HasInitial Cᵒᵖ :=
(initialOpOfTerminal terminalIsTerminal).hasInitial
instance hasTerminal_op_of_hasInitial [HasInitial C] : HasTerminal Cᵒᵖ :=
(terminalOpOfInitial initialIsInitial).hasTerminal
theorem hasTerminal_of_hasInitial_op [HasInitial Cᵒᵖ] : HasTerminal C :=
(terminalUnopOfInitial initialIsInitial).hasTerminal
theorem hasInitial_of_hasTerminal_op [HasTerminal Cᵒᵖ] : HasInitial C :=
(initialUnopOfTerminal terminalIsTerminal).hasInitial
instance {J : Type*} [Category J] {C : Type*} [Category C] [HasTerminal C] :
HasLimit ((CategoryTheory.Functor.const J).obj (⊤_ C)) :=
HasLimit.mk
{ cone :=
{ pt := ⊤_ C
π := { app := fun _ => terminal.from _ } }
isLimit := { lift := fun _ => terminal.from _ } }
/-- The limit of the constant `⊤_ C` functor is `⊤_ C`. -/
@[simps hom]
def limitConstTerminal {J : Type*} [Category J] {C : Type*} [Category C] [HasTerminal C] :
limit ((CategoryTheory.Functor.const J).obj (⊤_ C)) ≅ ⊤_ C where
hom := terminal.from _
inv :=
limit.lift ((CategoryTheory.Functor.const J).obj (⊤_ C))
{ pt := ⊤_ C
π := { app := fun _ => terminal.from _ } }
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limitConstTerminal_inv_π {J : Type*} [Category J] {C : Type*} [Category C] [HasTerminal C]
{j : J} :
limitConstTerminal.inv ≫ limit.π ((CategoryTheory.Functor.const J).obj (⊤_ C)) j =
terminal.from _ := by aesop_cat
instance {J : Type*} [Category J] {C : Type*} [Category C] [HasInitial C] :
HasColimit ((CategoryTheory.Functor.const J).obj (⊥_ C)) :=
HasColimit.mk
{ cocone :=
{ pt := ⊥_ C
ι := { app := fun _ => initial.to _ } }
isColimit := { desc := fun _ => initial.to _ } }
/-- The colimit of the constant `⊥_ C` functor is `⊥_ C`. -/
| @[simps inv]
def colimitConstInitial {J : Type*} [Category J] {C : Type*} [Category C] [HasInitial C] :
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/Terminal.lean | 208 | 209 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Hull
/-!
# Extreme sets
This file defines extreme sets and extreme points for sets in a module.
An extreme set of `A` is a subset of `A` that is as far as it can get in any outward direction: If
point `x` is in it and point `y ∈ A`, then the line passing through `x` and `y` leaves `A` at `x`.
This is an analytic notion of "being on the side of". It is weaker than being exposed (see
`IsExposed.isExtreme`).
## Main declarations
* `IsExtreme 𝕜 A B`: States that `B` is an extreme set of `A` (in the literature, `A` is often
implicit).
* `Set.extremePoints 𝕜 A`: Set of extreme points of `A` (corresponding to extreme singletons).
* `Convex.mem_extremePoints_iff_convex_diff`: A useful equivalent condition to being an extreme
point: `x` is an extreme point iff `A \ {x}` is convex.
## Implementation notes
The exact definition of extremeness has been carefully chosen so as to make as many lemmas
unconditional (in particular, the Krein-Milman theorem doesn't need the set to be convex!).
In practice, `A` is often assumed to be a convex set.
## References
See chapter 8 of [Barry Simon, *Convexity*][simon2011]
## TODO
Prove lemmas relating extreme sets and points to the intrinsic frontier.
-/
open Function Set Affine
variable {𝕜 E F ι : Type*} {M : ι → Type*}
section SMul
variable (𝕜) [Semiring 𝕜] [PartialOrder 𝕜] [AddCommMonoid E] [SMul 𝕜 E]
/-- A set `B` is an extreme subset of `A` if `B ⊆ A` and all points of `B` only belong to open
segments whose ends are in `B`. -/
def IsExtreme (A B : Set E) : Prop :=
B ⊆ A ∧ ∀ ⦃x₁⦄, x₁ ∈ A → ∀ ⦃x₂⦄, x₂ ∈ A → ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ B → x ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x₁ x₂ → x₁ ∈ B ∧ x₂ ∈ B
/-- A point `x` is an extreme point of a set `A` if `x` belongs to no open segment with ends in
`A`, except for the obvious `openSegment x x`.
In order to prove that `x` is an extreme point of `A`,
it is convenient to use `mem_extremePoints_iff_left` to avoid repeating arguments twice. -/
def Set.extremePoints (A : Set E) : Set E :=
{ x ∈ A | ∀ ⦃x₁⦄, x₁ ∈ A → ∀ ⦃x₂⦄, x₂ ∈ A → x ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x₁ x₂ → x₁ = x ∧ x₂ = x }
@[refl]
protected theorem IsExtreme.refl (A : Set E) : IsExtreme 𝕜 A A :=
⟨Subset.rfl, fun _ hx₁A _ hx₂A _ _ _ ↦ ⟨hx₁A, hx₂A⟩⟩
variable {𝕜} {A B C : Set E} {x : E}
protected theorem IsExtreme.rfl : IsExtreme 𝕜 A A :=
IsExtreme.refl 𝕜 A
@[trans]
protected theorem IsExtreme.trans (hAB : IsExtreme 𝕜 A B) (hBC : IsExtreme 𝕜 B C) :
IsExtreme 𝕜 A C := by
refine ⟨Subset.trans hBC.1 hAB.1, fun x₁ hx₁A x₂ hx₂A x hxC hx ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨hx₁B, hx₂B⟩ := hAB.2 hx₁A hx₂A (hBC.1 hxC) hx
exact hBC.2 hx₁B hx₂B hxC hx
protected theorem IsExtreme.antisymm : AntiSymmetric (IsExtreme 𝕜 : Set E → Set E → Prop) :=
fun _ _ hAB hBA ↦ Subset.antisymm hBA.1 hAB.1
instance : IsPartialOrder (Set E) (IsExtreme 𝕜) where
refl := IsExtreme.refl 𝕜
trans _ _ _ := IsExtreme.trans
antisymm := IsExtreme.antisymm
theorem IsExtreme.inter (hAB : IsExtreme 𝕜 A B) (hAC : IsExtreme 𝕜 A C) :
IsExtreme 𝕜 A (B ∩ C) := by
use Subset.trans inter_subset_left hAB.1
rintro x₁ hx₁A x₂ hx₂A x ⟨hxB, hxC⟩ hx
obtain ⟨hx₁B, hx₂B⟩ := hAB.2 hx₁A hx₂A hxB hx
obtain ⟨hx₁C, hx₂C⟩ := hAC.2 hx₁A hx₂A hxC hx
exact ⟨⟨hx₁B, hx₁C⟩, hx₂B, hx₂C⟩
protected theorem IsExtreme.mono (hAC : IsExtreme 𝕜 A C) (hBA : B ⊆ A) (hCB : C ⊆ B) :
IsExtreme 𝕜 B C :=
⟨hCB, fun _ hx₁B _ hx₂B _ hxC hx ↦ hAC.2 (hBA hx₁B) (hBA hx₂B) hxC hx⟩
theorem isExtreme_iInter {ι : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] {F : ι → Set E}
(hAF : ∀ i : ι, IsExtreme 𝕜 A (F i)) : IsExtreme 𝕜 A (⋂ i : ι, F i) := by
obtain i := Classical.arbitrary ι
refine ⟨iInter_subset_of_subset i (hAF i).1, fun x₁ hx₁A x₂ hx₂A x hxF hx ↦ ?_⟩
simp_rw [mem_iInter] at hxF ⊢
have h := fun i ↦ (hAF i).2 hx₁A hx₂A (hxF i) hx
exact ⟨fun i ↦ (h i).1, fun i ↦ (h i).2⟩
theorem isExtreme_biInter {F : Set (Set E)} (hF : F.Nonempty) (hA : ∀ B ∈ F, IsExtreme 𝕜 A B) :
IsExtreme 𝕜 A (⋂ B ∈ F, B) := by
haveI := hF.to_subtype
simpa only [iInter_subtype] using isExtreme_iInter fun i : F ↦ hA _ i.2
theorem isExtreme_sInter {F : Set (Set E)} (hF : F.Nonempty) (hAF : ∀ B ∈ F, IsExtreme 𝕜 A B) :
IsExtreme 𝕜 A (⋂₀ F) := by simpa [sInter_eq_biInter] using isExtreme_biInter hF hAF
theorem mem_extremePoints : x ∈ A.extremePoints 𝕜 ↔
x ∈ A ∧ ∀ᵉ (x₁ ∈ A) (x₂ ∈ A), x ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x₁ x₂ → x₁ = x ∧ x₂ = x :=
Iff.rfl
/-- In order to prove that a point `x` is an extreme point of a set `A`,
it suffices to show that `x ∈ A`
and for any `x₁`, `x₂` such that `x` belongs to the open segment `(x₁, x₂)`, we have `x₁ = x`.
The definition of `extremePoints` also requires `x₂ = x`, but this condition is redundant. -/
theorem mem_extremePoints_iff_left : x ∈ A.extremePoints 𝕜 ↔
x ∈ A ∧ ∀ x₁ ∈ A, ∀ x₂ ∈ A, x ∈ openSegment 𝕜 x₁ x₂ → x₁ = x := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.1, fun x₁ hx₁ x₂ hx₂ hx ↦ (h.2 hx₁ hx₂ hx).1⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨hxA, Hx⟩
use hxA
refine fun x₁ hx₁ x₂ hx₂ hx ↦ ⟨Hx x₁ hx₁ x₂ hx₂ hx, Hx x₂ hx₂ x₁ hx₁ ?_⟩
rwa [openSegment_symm]
/-- x is an extreme point to A iff {x} is an extreme set of A. -/
@[simp] lemma isExtreme_singleton : IsExtreme 𝕜 A {x} ↔ x ∈ A.extremePoints 𝕜 := by
refine ⟨fun hx ↦ ⟨singleton_subset_iff.1 hx.1, fun x₁ hx₁ x₂ hx₂ ↦ hx.2 hx₁ hx₂ rfl⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨hxA, hAx⟩
use singleton_subset_iff.2 hxA
rintro x₁ hx₁A x₂ hx₂A y (rfl : y = x)
exact hAx hx₁A hx₂A
alias ⟨IsExtreme.mem_extremePoints, _⟩ := isExtreme_singleton
theorem extremePoints_subset : A.extremePoints 𝕜 ⊆ A :=
fun _ hx ↦ hx.1
@[simp]
theorem extremePoints_empty : (∅ : Set E).extremePoints 𝕜 = ∅ :=
subset_empty_iff.1 extremePoints_subset
@[simp]
theorem extremePoints_singleton : ({x} : Set E).extremePoints 𝕜 = {x} :=
extremePoints_subset.antisymm <|
singleton_subset_iff.2 ⟨mem_singleton x, fun _ hx₁ _ hx₂ _ ↦ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩⟩
theorem inter_extremePoints_subset_extremePoints_of_subset (hBA : B ⊆ A) :
B ∩ A.extremePoints 𝕜 ⊆ B.extremePoints 𝕜 :=
fun _ ⟨hxB, hxA⟩ ↦ ⟨hxB, fun _ hx₁ _ hx₂ hx ↦ hxA.2 (hBA hx₁) (hBA hx₂) hx⟩
theorem IsExtreme.extremePoints_subset_extremePoints (hAB : IsExtreme 𝕜 A B) :
B.extremePoints 𝕜 ⊆ A.extremePoints 𝕜 :=
fun _ ↦ by simpa only [← isExtreme_singleton] using hAB.trans
theorem IsExtreme.extremePoints_eq (hAB : IsExtreme 𝕜 A B) :
B.extremePoints 𝕜 = B ∩ A.extremePoints 𝕜 :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ hx ↦ ⟨hx.1, hAB.extremePoints_subset_extremePoints hx⟩)
(inter_extremePoints_subset_extremePoints_of_subset hAB.1)
end SMul
section OrderedSemiring
variable [Semiring 𝕜] [PartialOrder 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup F] [∀ i, AddCommGroup (M i)]
[Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 F] [∀ i, Module 𝕜 (M i)] {A B : Set E}
theorem IsExtreme.convex_diff [IsOrderedRing 𝕜] (hA : Convex 𝕜 A) (hAB : IsExtreme 𝕜 A B) :
Convex 𝕜 (A \ B) :=
convex_iff_openSegment_subset.2 fun _ ⟨hx₁A, hx₁B⟩ _ ⟨hx₂A, _⟩ _ hx ↦
⟨hA.openSegment_subset hx₁A hx₂A hx, fun hxB ↦ hx₁B (hAB.2 hx₁A hx₂A hxB hx).1⟩
@[simp]
theorem extremePoints_prod (s : Set E) (t : Set F) :
(s ×ˢ t).extremePoints 𝕜 = s.extremePoints 𝕜 ×ˢ t.extremePoints 𝕜 := by
ext
refine (and_congr_right fun hx ↦ ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩).trans and_and_and_comm
constructor
· rintro x₁ hx₁ x₂ hx₂ hx_fst
refine (h (mk_mem_prod hx₁ hx.2) (mk_mem_prod hx₂ hx.2) ?_).imp (congr_arg Prod.fst)
(congr_arg Prod.fst)
rw [← Prod.image_mk_openSegment_left]
exact ⟨_, hx_fst, rfl⟩
· rintro x₁ hx₁ x₂ hx₂ hx_snd
refine (h (mk_mem_prod hx.1 hx₁) (mk_mem_prod hx.1 hx₂) ?_).imp (congr_arg Prod.snd)
(congr_arg Prod.snd)
rw [← Prod.image_mk_openSegment_right]
exact ⟨_, hx_snd, rfl⟩
· rintro x₁ hx₁ x₂ hx₂ ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, hx'⟩
simp_rw [Prod.ext_iff]
exact and_and_and_comm.1
⟨h.1 hx₁.1 hx₂.1 ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, congr_arg Prod.fst hx'⟩,
h.2 hx₁.2 hx₂.2 ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, congr_arg Prod.snd hx'⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem extremePoints_pi (s : ∀ i, Set (M i)) :
(univ.pi s).extremePoints 𝕜 = univ.pi fun i ↦ (s i).extremePoints 𝕜 := by
classical
ext x
simp only [mem_extremePoints, mem_pi, mem_univ, true_imp_iff, @forall_and ι]
refine and_congr_right fun hx ↦ ⟨fun h i ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rintro x₁ hx₁ x₂ hx₂ hi
refine (h (update x i x₁) ?_ (update x i x₂) ?_ ?_).imp (fun h₁ ↦ by rw [← h₁, update_self])
fun h₂ ↦ by rw [← h₂, update_self]
iterate 2
rintro j
obtain rfl | hji := eq_or_ne j i
· rwa [update_self]
· rw [update_of_ne hji]
exact hx _
rw [← Pi.image_update_openSegment]
exact ⟨_, hi, update_eq_self _ _⟩
· rintro x₁ hx₁ x₂ hx₂ ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, hx'⟩
simp_rw [funext_iff, ← forall_and]
exact fun i ↦ h _ _ (hx₁ _) _ (hx₂ _) ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, congr_fun hx' _⟩
end OrderedSemiring
section OrderedRing
variable {L : Type*} [Ring 𝕜] [PartialOrder 𝕜] [IsOrderedRing 𝕜]
[AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] [AddCommGroup F] [Module 𝕜 F]
[EquivLike L E F] [LinearEquivClass L 𝕜 E F]
lemma image_extremePoints (f : L) (s : Set E) :
f '' extremePoints 𝕜 s = extremePoints 𝕜 (f '' s) := by
ext b
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := EquivLike.surjective f b
have : ∀ x y, f '' openSegment 𝕜 x y = openSegment 𝕜 (f x) (f y) :=
image_openSegment _ (LinearMapClass.linearMap f).toAffineMap
simp only [mem_extremePoints, (EquivLike.surjective f).forall,
(EquivLike.injective f).mem_set_image, (EquivLike.injective f).eq_iff, ← this]
end OrderedRing
section LinearOrderedRing
variable [Ring 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
variable [DenselyOrdered 𝕜] [NoZeroSMulDivisors 𝕜 E] {A : Set E} {x : E}
/-- A useful restatement using `segment`: `x` is an extreme point iff the only (closed) segments
that contain it are those with `x` as one of their endpoints. -/
theorem mem_extremePoints_iff_forall_segment : x ∈ A.extremePoints 𝕜 ↔
x ∈ A ∧ ∀ᵉ (x₁ ∈ A) (x₂ ∈ A), x ∈ segment 𝕜 x₁ x₂ → x₁ = x ∨ x₂ = x := by
refine and_congr_right fun hxA ↦ forall₄_congr fun x₁ h₁ x₂ h₂ ↦ ?_
constructor
· rw [← insert_endpoints_openSegment]
rintro H (rfl | rfl | hx)
exacts [Or.inl rfl, Or.inr rfl, Or.inl <| (H hx).1]
· intro H hx
rcases H (openSegment_subset_segment _ _ _ hx) with (rfl | rfl)
exacts [⟨rfl, (left_mem_openSegment_iff.1 hx).symm⟩, ⟨right_mem_openSegment_iff.1 hx, rfl⟩]
theorem Convex.mem_extremePoints_iff_convex_diff (hA : Convex 𝕜 A) :
x ∈ A.extremePoints 𝕜 ↔ x ∈ A ∧ Convex 𝕜 (A \ {x}) := by
use fun hx ↦ ⟨hx.1, (isExtreme_singleton.2 hx).convex_diff hA⟩
rintro ⟨hxA, hAx⟩
refine mem_extremePoints_iff_forall_segment.2 ⟨hxA, fun x₁ hx₁ x₂ hx₂ hx ↦ ?_⟩
rw [convex_iff_segment_subset] at hAx
by_contra! h
exact (hAx ⟨hx₁, fun hx₁ ↦ h.1 (mem_singleton_iff.2 hx₁)⟩
⟨hx₂, fun hx₂ ↦ h.2 (mem_singleton_iff.2 hx₂)⟩ hx).2 rfl
theorem Convex.mem_extremePoints_iff_mem_diff_convexHull_diff (hA : Convex 𝕜 A) :
x ∈ A.extremePoints 𝕜 ↔ x ∈ A \ convexHull 𝕜 (A \ {x}) := by
rw [hA.mem_extremePoints_iff_convex_diff, hA.convex_remove_iff_not_mem_convexHull_remove,
mem_diff]
theorem extremePoints_convexHull_subset : (convexHull 𝕜 A).extremePoints 𝕜 ⊆ A := by
rintro x hx
rw [(convex_convexHull 𝕜 _).mem_extremePoints_iff_convex_diff] at hx
by_contra h
exact (convexHull_min (subset_diff.2 ⟨subset_convexHull 𝕜 _, disjoint_singleton_right.2 h⟩) hx.2
hx.1).2 rfl
end LinearOrderedRing
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Extreme.lean | 287 | 292 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Shing Tak Lam. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Shing Tak Lam
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.ProjIcc
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousMap.Ordered
import Mathlib.Topology.CompactOpen
import Mathlib.Topology.UnitInterval
/-!
# Homotopy between functions
In this file, we define a homotopy between two functions `f₀` and `f₁`. First we define
`ContinuousMap.Homotopy` between the two functions, with no restrictions on the intermediate
maps. Then, as in the formalisation in HOL-Analysis, we define
`ContinuousMap.HomotopyWith f₀ f₁ P`, for homotopies between `f₀` and `f₁`, where the
intermediate maps satisfy the predicate `P`. Finally, we define
`ContinuousMap.HomotopyRel f₀ f₁ S`, for homotopies between `f₀` and `f₁` which are fixed
on `S`.
## Definitions
* `ContinuousMap.Homotopy f₀ f₁` is the type of homotopies between `f₀` and `f₁`.
* `ContinuousMap.HomotopyWith f₀ f₁ P` is the type of homotopies between `f₀` and `f₁`, where
the intermediate maps satisfy the predicate `P`.
* `ContinuousMap.HomotopyRel f₀ f₁ S` is the type of homotopies between `f₀` and `f₁` which
are fixed on `S`.
For each of the above, we have
* `refl f`, which is the constant homotopy from `f` to `f`.
* `symm F`, which reverses the homotopy `F`. For example, if `F : ContinuousMap.Homotopy f₀ f₁`,
then `F.symm : ContinuousMap.Homotopy f₁ f₀`.
* `trans F G`, which concatenates the homotopies `F` and `G`. For example, if
`F : ContinuousMap.Homotopy f₀ f₁` and `G : ContinuousMap.Homotopy f₁ f₂`, then
`F.trans G : ContinuousMap.Homotopy f₀ f₂`.
We also define the relations
* `ContinuousMap.Homotopic f₀ f₁` is defined to be `Nonempty (ContinuousMap.Homotopy f₀ f₁)`
* `ContinuousMap.HomotopicWith f₀ f₁ P` is defined to be
`Nonempty (ContinuousMap.HomotopyWith f₀ f₁ P)`
* `ContinuousMap.HomotopicRel f₀ f₁ P` is defined to be
`Nonempty (ContinuousMap.HomotopyRel f₀ f₁ P)`
and for `ContinuousMap.homotopic` and `ContinuousMap.homotopic_rel`, we also define the
`setoid` and `quotient` in `C(X, Y)` by these relations.
## References
- [HOL-Analysis formalisation](https://isabelle.in.tum.de/library/HOL/HOL-Analysis/Homotopy.html)
-/
noncomputable section
universe u v w x
variable {F : Type*} {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {Z : Type w} {Z' : Type x} {ι : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Z] [TopologicalSpace Z']
open unitInterval
namespace ContinuousMap
/-- `ContinuousMap.Homotopy f₀ f₁` is the type of homotopies from `f₀` to `f₁`.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : Homotopy f₀ f₁)`,
you should parametrize over `{F : Type*} [HomotopyLike F f₀ f₁] (f : F)`.
When you extend this structure, make sure to extend `ContinuousMap.HomotopyLike`. -/
structure Homotopy (f₀ f₁ : C(X, Y)) extends C(I × X, Y) where
/-- value of the homotopy at 0 -/
map_zero_left : ∀ x, toFun (0, x) = f₀ x
/-- value of the homotopy at 1 -/
map_one_left : ∀ x, toFun (1, x) = f₁ x
section
/-- `ContinuousMap.HomotopyLike F f₀ f₁` states that `F` is a type of homotopies between `f₀` and
`f₁`.
You should extend this class when you extend `ContinuousMap.Homotopy`. -/
class HomotopyLike {X Y : outParam Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y]
(F : Type*) (f₀ f₁ : outParam <| C(X, Y)) [FunLike F (I × X) Y] : Prop
extends ContinuousMapClass F (I × X) Y where
/-- value of the homotopy at 0 -/
map_zero_left (f : F) : ∀ x, f (0, x) = f₀ x
/-- value of the homotopy at 1 -/
map_one_left (f : F) : ∀ x, f (1, x) = f₁ x
end
namespace Homotopy
section
variable {f₀ f₁ : C(X, Y)}
instance instFunLike : FunLike (Homotopy f₀ f₁) (I × X) Y where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by
obtain ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩ := f
obtain ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩ := g
congr
instance : HomotopyLike (Homotopy f₀ f₁) f₀ f₁ where
map_continuous f := f.continuous_toFun
map_zero_left f := f.map_zero_left
map_one_left f := f.map_one_left
@[ext]
theorem ext {F G : Homotopy f₀ f₁} (h : ∀ x, F x = G x) : F = G :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
/-- See Note [custom simps projection]. We need to specify this projection explicitly in this case,
because it is a composition of multiple projections. -/
def Simps.apply (F : Homotopy f₀ f₁) : I × X → Y :=
F
initialize_simps_projections Homotopy (toFun → apply, -toContinuousMap)
/-- Deprecated. Use `map_continuous` instead. -/
protected theorem continuous (F : Homotopy f₀ f₁) : Continuous F :=
F.continuous_toFun
@[simp]
theorem apply_zero (F : Homotopy f₀ f₁) (x : X) : F (0, x) = f₀ x :=
F.map_zero_left x
@[simp]
theorem apply_one (F : Homotopy f₀ f₁) (x : X) : F (1, x) = f₁ x :=
F.map_one_left x
@[simp]
theorem coe_toContinuousMap (F : Homotopy f₀ f₁) : ⇑F.toContinuousMap = F :=
rfl
/-- Currying a homotopy to a continuous function from `I` to `C(X, Y)`.
-/
def curry (F : Homotopy f₀ f₁) : C(I, C(X, Y)) :=
F.toContinuousMap.curry
@[simp]
theorem curry_apply (F : Homotopy f₀ f₁) (t : I) (x : X) : F.curry t x = F (t, x) :=
rfl
/-- Continuously extending a curried homotopy to a function from `ℝ` to `C(X, Y)`.
-/
def extend (F : Homotopy f₀ f₁) : C(ℝ, C(X, Y)) :=
F.curry.IccExtend zero_le_one
theorem extend_apply_of_le_zero (F : Homotopy f₀ f₁) {t : ℝ} (ht : t ≤ 0) (x : X) :
F.extend t x = f₀ x := by
rw [← F.apply_zero]
exact ContinuousMap.congr_fun (Set.IccExtend_of_le_left (zero_le_one' ℝ) F.curry ht) x
theorem extend_apply_of_one_le (F : Homotopy f₀ f₁) {t : ℝ} (ht : 1 ≤ t) (x : X) :
F.extend t x = f₁ x := by
rw [← F.apply_one]
exact ContinuousMap.congr_fun (Set.IccExtend_of_right_le (zero_le_one' ℝ) F.curry ht) x
theorem extend_apply_coe (F : Homotopy f₀ f₁) (t : I) (x : X) : F.extend t x = F (t, x) :=
ContinuousMap.congr_fun (Set.IccExtend_val (zero_le_one' ℝ) F.curry t) x
@[simp]
theorem extend_apply_of_mem_I (F : Homotopy f₀ f₁) {t : ℝ} (ht : t ∈ I) (x : X) :
F.extend t x = F (⟨t, ht⟩, x) :=
ContinuousMap.congr_fun (Set.IccExtend_of_mem (zero_le_one' ℝ) F.curry ht) x
protected theorem congr_fun {F G : Homotopy f₀ f₁} (h : F = G) (x : I × X) : F x = G x :=
ContinuousMap.congr_fun (congr_arg _ h) x
protected theorem congr_arg (F : Homotopy f₀ f₁) {x y : I × X} (h : x = y) : F x = F y :=
F.toContinuousMap.congr_arg h
end
/-- Given a continuous function `f`, we can define a `Homotopy f f` by `F (t, x) = f x`
-/
@[simps]
def refl (f : C(X, Y)) : Homotopy f f where
toFun x := f x.2
map_zero_left _ := rfl
map_one_left _ := rfl
instance : Inhabited (Homotopy (ContinuousMap.id X) (ContinuousMap.id X)) :=
⟨Homotopy.refl _⟩
/-- Given a `Homotopy f₀ f₁`, we can define a `Homotopy f₁ f₀` by reversing the homotopy.
-/
@[simps]
def symm {f₀ f₁ : C(X, Y)} (F : Homotopy f₀ f₁) : Homotopy f₁ f₀ where
toFun x := F (σ x.1, x.2)
map_zero_left := by norm_num
map_one_left := by norm_num
@[simp]
theorem symm_symm {f₀ f₁ : C(X, Y)} (F : Homotopy f₀ f₁) : F.symm.symm = F := by
ext
simp
theorem symm_bijective {f₀ f₁ : C(X, Y)} :
Function.Bijective (Homotopy.symm : Homotopy f₀ f₁ → Homotopy f₁ f₀) :=
Function.bijective_iff_has_inverse.mpr ⟨_, symm_symm, symm_symm⟩
/--
Given `Homotopy f₀ f₁` and `Homotopy f₁ f₂`, we can define a `Homotopy f₀ f₂` by putting the first
homotopy on `[0, 1/2]` and the second on `[1/2, 1]`.
-/
def trans {f₀ f₁ f₂ : C(X, Y)} (F : Homotopy f₀ f₁) (G : Homotopy f₁ f₂) : Homotopy f₀ f₂ where
toFun x := if (x.1 : ℝ) ≤ 1 / 2 then F.extend (2 * x.1) x.2 else G.extend (2 * x.1 - 1) x.2
continuous_toFun := by
refine
continuous_if_le (by fun_prop) continuous_const
(F.continuous.comp (by continuity)).continuousOn
(G.continuous.comp (by continuity)).continuousOn ?_
rintro x hx
norm_num [hx]
map_zero_left x := by norm_num
map_one_left x := by norm_num
|
theorem trans_apply {f₀ f₁ f₂ : C(X, Y)} (F : Homotopy f₀ f₁) (G : Homotopy f₁ f₂) (x : I × X) :
(F.trans G) x =
| Mathlib/Topology/Homotopy/Basic.lean | 222 | 224 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Johannes Hölzl, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Indexed
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.IsBounded
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.CompleteLattice
/-!
# liminfs and limsups of functions and filters
Defines the liminf/limsup of a function taking values in a conditionally complete lattice, with
respect to an arbitrary filter.
We define `limsSup f` (`limsInf f`) where `f` is a filter taking values in a conditionally complete
lattice. `limsSup f` is the smallest element `a` such that, eventually, `u ≤ a` (and vice versa for
`limsInf f`). To work with the Limsup along a function `u` use `limsSup (map u f)`.
Usually, one defines the Limsup as `inf (sup s)` where the Inf is taken over all sets in the filter.
For instance, in ℕ along a function `u`, this is `inf_n (sup_{k ≥ n} u k)` (and the latter quantity
decreases with `n`, so this is in fact a limit.). There is however a difficulty: it is well possible
that `u` is not bounded on the whole space, only eventually (think of `limsup (fun x ↦ 1/x)` on ℝ.
Then there is no guarantee that the quantity above really decreases (the value of the `sup`
beforehand is not really well defined, as one can not use ∞), so that the Inf could be anything.
So one can not use this `inf sup ...` definition in conditionally complete lattices, and one has
to use a less tractable definition.
In conditionally complete lattices, the definition is only useful for filters which are eventually
bounded above (otherwise, the Limsup would morally be +∞, which does not belong to the space) and
which are frequently bounded below (otherwise, the Limsup would morally be -∞, which is not in the
space either). We start with definitions of these concepts for arbitrary filters, before turning to
the definitions of Limsup and Liminf.
In complete lattices, however, it coincides with the `Inf Sup` definition.
-/
open Filter Set Function
variable {α β γ ι ι' : Type*}
namespace Filter
section ConditionallyCompleteLattice
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] {s : Set α} {u : β → α}
/-- The `limsSup` of a filter `f` is the infimum of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`,
holds `x ≤ a`. -/
def limsSup (f : Filter α) : α :=
sInf { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ a }
/-- The `limsInf` of a filter `f` is the supremum of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`,
holds `x ≥ a`. -/
def limsInf (f : Filter α) : α :=
sSup { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ n }
/-- The `limsup` of a function `u` along a filter `f` is the infimum of the `a` such that,
eventually for `f`, holds `u x ≤ a`. -/
def limsup (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) : α :=
limsSup (map u f)
/-- The `liminf` of a function `u` along a filter `f` is the supremum of the `a` such that,
eventually for `f`, holds `u x ≥ a`. -/
def liminf (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) : α :=
limsInf (map u f)
/-- The `blimsup` of a function `u` along a filter `f`, bounded by a predicate `p`, is the infimum
of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`, `u x ≤ a` whenever `p x` holds. -/
def blimsup (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) (p : β → Prop) :=
sInf { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → u x ≤ a }
/-- The `bliminf` of a function `u` along a filter `f`, bounded by a predicate `p`, is the supremum
of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`, `a ≤ u x` whenever `p x` holds. -/
def bliminf (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) (p : β → Prop) :=
sSup { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → a ≤ u x }
section
variable {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop}
theorem limsup_eq : limsup u f = sInf { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, u n ≤ a } :=
rfl
theorem liminf_eq : liminf u f = sSup { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ u n } :=
rfl
theorem blimsup_eq : blimsup u f p = sInf { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → u x ≤ a } :=
rfl
theorem bliminf_eq : bliminf u f p = sSup { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → a ≤ u x } :=
rfl
lemma liminf_comp (u : β → α) (v : γ → β) (f : Filter γ) :
liminf (u ∘ v) f = liminf u (map v f) := rfl
lemma limsup_comp (u : β → α) (v : γ → β) (f : Filter γ) :
limsup (u ∘ v) f = limsup u (map v f) := rfl
end
@[simp]
theorem blimsup_true (f : Filter β) (u : β → α) : (blimsup u f fun _ => True) = limsup u f := by
simp [blimsup_eq, limsup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_true (f : Filter β) (u : β → α) : (bliminf u f fun _ => True) = liminf u f := by
simp [bliminf_eq, liminf_eq]
lemma blimsup_eq_limsup {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop} :
blimsup u f p = limsup u (f ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) := by
simp only [blimsup_eq, limsup_eq, eventually_inf_principal, mem_setOf_eq]
lemma bliminf_eq_liminf {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop} :
bliminf u f p = liminf u (f ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) :=
blimsup_eq_limsup (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem blimsup_eq_limsup_subtype {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop} :
blimsup u f p = limsup (u ∘ ((↑) : { x | p x } → β)) (comap (↑) f) := by
rw [blimsup_eq_limsup, limsup, limsup, ← map_map, map_comap_setCoe_val]
theorem bliminf_eq_liminf_subtype {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop} :
bliminf u f p = liminf (u ∘ ((↑) : { x | p x } → β)) (comap (↑) f) :=
blimsup_eq_limsup_subtype (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem limsSup_le_of_le {f : Filter α} {a}
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ a) : limsSup f ≤ a :=
csInf_le hf h
theorem le_limsInf_of_le {f : Filter α} {a}
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ n) : a ≤ limsInf f :=
le_csSup hf h
theorem limsup_le_of_le {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a}
(hf : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in f, u n ≤ a) : limsup u f ≤ a :=
csInf_le hf h
theorem le_liminf_of_le {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a}
(hf : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ u n) : a ≤ liminf u f :=
le_csSup hf h
theorem le_limsSup_of_le {f : Filter α} {a}
(hf : f.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ b) → a ≤ b) : a ≤ limsSup f :=
le_csInf hf h
theorem limsInf_le_of_le {f : Filter α} {a}
(hf : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, b ≤ n) → b ≤ a) : limsInf f ≤ a :=
csSup_le hf h
theorem le_limsup_of_le {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a}
(hf : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, u n ≤ b) → a ≤ b) : a ≤ limsup u f :=
le_csInf hf h
theorem liminf_le_of_le {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a}
(hf : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, b ≤ u n) → b ≤ a) : liminf u f ≤ a :=
csSup_le hf h
theorem limsInf_le_limsSup {f : Filter α} [NeBot f]
(h₁ : f.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsInf f ≤ limsSup f :=
liminf_le_of_le h₂ fun a₀ ha₀ =>
le_limsup_of_le h₁ fun a₁ ha₁ =>
show a₀ ≤ a₁ from
let ⟨_, hb₀, hb₁⟩ := (ha₀.and ha₁).exists
le_trans hb₀ hb₁
theorem liminf_le_limsup {f : Filter β} [NeBot f] {u : β → α}
(h : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h' : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ limsup u f :=
limsInf_le_limsSup h h'
theorem limsSup_le_limsSup {f g : Filter α}
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ a, (∀ᶠ n in g, n ≤ a) → ∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ a) : limsSup f ≤ limsSup g :=
csInf_le_csInf hf hg h
theorem limsInf_le_limsInf {f g : Filter α}
(hf : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ a, (∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ n) → ∀ᶠ n in g, a ≤ n) : limsInf f ≤ limsInf g :=
csSup_le_csSup hg hf h
theorem limsup_le_limsup {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : u ≤ᶠ[f] v)
(hu : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hv : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsup u f ≤ limsup v f :=
limsSup_le_limsSup hu hv fun _ => h.trans
theorem liminf_le_liminf {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ a in f, u a ≤ v a)
(hu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hv : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ liminf v f :=
limsup_le_limsup (β := βᵒᵈ) h hv hu
theorem limsSup_le_limsSup_of_le {f g : Filter α} (h : f ≤ g)
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsSup f ≤ limsSup g :=
limsSup_le_limsSup hf hg fun _ ha => h ha
theorem limsInf_le_limsInf_of_le {f g : Filter α} (h : g ≤ f)
(hf : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsInf f ≤ limsInf g :=
limsInf_le_limsInf hf hg fun _ ha => h ha
theorem limsup_le_limsup_of_le {α β} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f g : Filter α} (h : f ≤ g)
{u : α → β}
(hf : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsup u f ≤ limsup u g :=
limsSup_le_limsSup_of_le (map_mono h) hf hg
theorem liminf_le_liminf_of_le {α β} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f g : Filter α} (h : g ≤ f)
{u : α → β}
(hf : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ liminf u g :=
limsInf_le_limsInf_of_le (map_mono h) hf hg
lemma limsSup_principal_eq_csSup (h : BddAbove s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : limsSup (𝓟 s) = sSup s := by
simp only [limsSup, eventually_principal]; exact csInf_upperBounds_eq_csSup h hs
lemma limsInf_principal_eq_csSup (h : BddBelow s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : limsInf (𝓟 s) = sInf s :=
limsSup_principal_eq_csSup (α := αᵒᵈ) h hs
lemma limsup_top_eq_ciSup [Nonempty β] (hu : BddAbove (range u)) : limsup u ⊤ = ⨆ i, u i := by
rw [limsup, map_top, limsSup_principal_eq_csSup hu (range_nonempty _), sSup_range]
lemma liminf_top_eq_ciInf [Nonempty β] (hu : BddBelow (range u)) : liminf u ⊤ = ⨅ i, u i := by
rw [liminf, map_top, limsInf_principal_eq_csSup hu (range_nonempty _), sInf_range]
theorem limsup_congr {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ a in f, u a = v a) : limsup u f = limsup v f := by
rw [limsup_eq]
congr with b
exact eventually_congr (h.mono fun x hx => by simp [hx])
theorem blimsup_congr {f : Filter β} {u v : β → α} {p : β → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ a in f, p a → u a = v a) :
blimsup u f p = blimsup v f p := by
simpa only [blimsup_eq_limsup] using limsup_congr <| eventually_inf_principal.2 h
theorem bliminf_congr {f : Filter β} {u v : β → α} {p : β → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ a in f, p a → u a = v a) :
bliminf u f p = bliminf v f p :=
blimsup_congr (α := αᵒᵈ) h
theorem liminf_congr {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ a in f, u a = v a) : liminf u f = liminf v f :=
limsup_congr (β := βᵒᵈ) h
@[simp]
theorem limsup_const {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} [NeBot f]
(b : β) : limsup (fun _ => b) f = b := by
simpa only [limsup_eq, eventually_const] using csInf_Ici
@[simp]
theorem liminf_const {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} [NeBot f]
(b : β) : liminf (fun _ => b) f = b :=
limsup_const (β := βᵒᵈ) b
theorem HasBasis.liminf_eq_sSup_iUnion_iInter {ι ι' : Type*} {f : ι → α} {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} (hv : v.HasBasis p s) :
liminf f v = sSup (⋃ (j : Subtype p), ⋂ (i : s j), Iic (f i)) := by
simp_rw [liminf_eq, hv.eventually_iff]
congr
ext x
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, iInter_coe_set, mem_iUnion, mem_iInter, mem_Iic, Subtype.exists,
exists_prop]
theorem HasBasis.liminf_eq_sSup_univ_of_empty {f : ι → α} {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} (hv : v.HasBasis p s) (i : ι') (hi : p i) (h'i : s i = ∅) :
liminf f v = sSup univ := by
simp [hv.eq_bot_iff.2 ⟨i, hi, h'i⟩, liminf_eq]
theorem HasBasis.limsup_eq_sInf_iUnion_iInter {ι ι' : Type*} {f : ι → α} {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} (hv : v.HasBasis p s) :
limsup f v = sInf (⋃ (j : Subtype p), ⋂ (i : s j), Ici (f i)) :=
HasBasis.liminf_eq_sSup_iUnion_iInter (α := αᵒᵈ) hv
theorem HasBasis.limsup_eq_sInf_univ_of_empty {f : ι → α} {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} (hv : v.HasBasis p s) (i : ι') (hi : p i) (h'i : s i = ∅) :
limsup f v = sInf univ :=
HasBasis.liminf_eq_sSup_univ_of_empty (α := αᵒᵈ) hv i hi h'i
@[simp]
theorem liminf_nat_add (f : ℕ → α) (k : ℕ) :
liminf (fun i => f (i + k)) atTop = liminf f atTop := by
rw [← Function.comp_def, liminf, liminf, ← map_map, map_add_atTop_eq_nat]
@[simp]
theorem limsup_nat_add (f : ℕ → α) (k : ℕ) : limsup (fun i => f (i + k)) atTop = limsup f atTop :=
@liminf_nat_add αᵒᵈ _ f k
end ConditionallyCompleteLattice
section CompleteLattice
variable [CompleteLattice α]
@[simp]
theorem limsSup_bot : limsSup (⊥ : Filter α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique <| sInf_le <| by simp
@[simp] theorem limsup_bot (f : β → α) : limsup f ⊥ = ⊥ := by simp [limsup]
@[simp]
theorem limsInf_bot : limsInf (⊥ : Filter α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| le_sSup <| by simp
@[simp] theorem liminf_bot (f : β → α) : liminf f ⊥ = ⊤ := by simp [liminf]
@[simp]
theorem limsSup_top : limsSup (⊤ : Filter α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| le_sInf <| by simpa [eq_univ_iff_forall] using fun b hb => top_unique <| hb _
@[simp]
theorem limsInf_top : limsInf (⊤ : Filter α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique <| sSup_le <| by simpa [eq_univ_iff_forall] using fun b hb => bot_unique <| hb _
@[simp]
theorem blimsup_false {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : (blimsup u f fun _ => False) = ⊥ := by
simp [blimsup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_false {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : (bliminf u f fun _ => False) = ⊤ := by
simp [bliminf_eq]
/-- Same as limsup_const applied to `⊥` but without the `NeBot f` assumption -/
@[simp]
theorem limsup_const_bot {f : Filter β} : limsup (fun _ : β => (⊥ : α)) f = (⊥ : α) := by
rw [limsup_eq, eq_bot_iff]
exact sInf_le (Eventually.of_forall fun _ => le_rfl)
/-- Same as limsup_const applied to `⊤` but without the `NeBot f` assumption -/
@[simp]
theorem liminf_const_top {f : Filter β} : liminf (fun _ : β => (⊤ : α)) f = (⊤ : α) :=
limsup_const_bot (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem HasBasis.limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup {ι} {p : ι → Prop} {s} {f : Filter α} (h : f.HasBasis p s) :
limsSup f = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), sSup (s i) :=
le_antisymm (le_iInf₂ fun i hi => sInf_le <| h.eventually_iff.2 ⟨i, hi, fun _ => le_sSup⟩)
(le_sInf fun _ ha =>
let ⟨_, hi, ha⟩ := h.eventually_iff.1 ha
iInf₂_le_of_le _ hi <| sSup_le ha)
theorem HasBasis.limsInf_eq_iSup_sInf {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} {f : Filter α}
(h : f.HasBasis p s) : limsInf f = ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), sInf (s i) :=
HasBasis.limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup (α := αᵒᵈ) h
theorem limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup {f : Filter α} : limsSup f = ⨅ s ∈ f, sSup s :=
f.basis_sets.limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup
theorem limsInf_eq_iSup_sInf {f : Filter α} : limsInf f = ⨆ s ∈ f, sInf s :=
limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem limsup_le_iSup {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : limsup u f ≤ ⨆ n, u n :=
limsup_le_of_le (by isBoundedDefault) (Eventually.of_forall (le_iSup u))
theorem iInf_le_liminf {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : ⨅ n, u n ≤ liminf u f :=
le_liminf_of_le (by isBoundedDefault) (Eventually.of_forall (iInf_le u))
/-- In a complete lattice, the limsup of a function is the infimum over sets `s` in the filter
of the supremum of the function over `s` -/
theorem limsup_eq_iInf_iSup {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : limsup u f = ⨅ s ∈ f, ⨆ a ∈ s, u a :=
(f.basis_sets.map u).limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup.trans <| by simp only [sSup_image, id]
theorem limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat {u : ℕ → α} : limsup u atTop = ⨅ n : ℕ, ⨆ i ≥ n, u i :=
(atTop_basis.map u).limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup.trans <| by simp only [sSup_image, iInf_const]; rfl
theorem limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat' {u : ℕ → α} : limsup u atTop = ⨅ n : ℕ, ⨆ i : ℕ, u (i + n) := by
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat, iSup_ge_eq_iSup_nat_add]
theorem HasBasis.limsup_eq_iInf_iSup {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set β} {f : Filter β} {u : β → α}
(h : f.HasBasis p s) : limsup u f = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), ⨆ a ∈ s i, u a :=
(h.map u).limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup.trans <| by simp only [sSup_image, id]
lemma limsSup_principal_eq_sSup (s : Set α) : limsSup (𝓟 s) = sSup s := by
simpa only [limsSup, eventually_principal] using sInf_upperBounds_eq_csSup s
lemma limsInf_principal_eq_sInf (s : Set α) : limsInf (𝓟 s) = sInf s := by
simpa only [limsInf, eventually_principal] using sSup_lowerBounds_eq_sInf s
@[simp] lemma limsup_top_eq_iSup (u : β → α) : limsup u ⊤ = ⨆ i, u i := by
rw [limsup, map_top, limsSup_principal_eq_sSup, sSup_range]
@[simp] lemma liminf_top_eq_iInf (u : β → α) : liminf u ⊤ = ⨅ i, u i := by
rw [liminf, map_top, limsInf_principal_eq_sInf, sInf_range]
theorem blimsup_congr' {f : Filter β} {p q : β → Prop} {u : β → α}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ≠ ⊥ → (p x ↔ q x)) : blimsup u f p = blimsup u f q := by
simp only [blimsup_eq]
congr with a
refine eventually_congr (h.mono fun b hb => ?_)
rcases eq_or_ne (u b) ⊥ with hu | hu; · simp [hu]
rw [hb hu]
theorem bliminf_congr' {f : Filter β} {p q : β → Prop} {u : β → α}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ≠ ⊤ → (p x ↔ q x)) : bliminf u f p = bliminf u f q :=
blimsup_congr' (α := αᵒᵈ) h
lemma HasBasis.blimsup_eq_iInf_iSup {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set β} {f : Filter β} {u : β → α}
(hf : f.HasBasis p s) {q : β → Prop} :
blimsup u f q = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), ⨆ a ∈ s i, ⨆ (_ : q a), u a := by
simp only [blimsup_eq_limsup, (hf.inf_principal _).limsup_eq_iInf_iSup, mem_inter_iff, iSup_and,
mem_setOf_eq]
theorem blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup {f : Filter β} {p : β → Prop} {u : β → α} :
blimsup u f p = ⨅ s ∈ f, ⨆ (b) (_ : p b ∧ b ∈ s), u b := by
simp only [f.basis_sets.blimsup_eq_iInf_iSup, iSup_and', id, and_comm]
theorem blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup_of_nat {p : ℕ → Prop} {u : ℕ → α} :
blimsup u atTop p = ⨅ i, ⨆ (j) (_ : p j ∧ i ≤ j), u j := by
simp only [atTop_basis.blimsup_eq_iInf_iSup, @and_comm (p _), iSup_and, mem_Ici, iInf_true]
/-- In a complete lattice, the liminf of a function is the infimum over sets `s` in the filter
of the supremum of the function over `s` -/
theorem liminf_eq_iSup_iInf {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : liminf u f = ⨆ s ∈ f, ⨅ a ∈ s, u a :=
limsup_eq_iInf_iSup (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem liminf_eq_iSup_iInf_of_nat {u : ℕ → α} : liminf u atTop = ⨆ n : ℕ, ⨅ i ≥ n, u i :=
@limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat αᵒᵈ _ u
theorem liminf_eq_iSup_iInf_of_nat' {u : ℕ → α} : liminf u atTop = ⨆ n : ℕ, ⨅ i : ℕ, u (i + n) :=
@limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat' αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem HasBasis.liminf_eq_iSup_iInf {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set β} {f : Filter β} {u : β → α}
(h : f.HasBasis p s) : liminf u f = ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), ⨅ a ∈ s i, u a :=
HasBasis.limsup_eq_iInf_iSup (α := αᵒᵈ) h
theorem bliminf_eq_iSup_biInf {f : Filter β} {p : β → Prop} {u : β → α} :
bliminf u f p = ⨆ s ∈ f, ⨅ (b) (_ : p b ∧ b ∈ s), u b :=
@blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup αᵒᵈ β _ f p u
theorem bliminf_eq_iSup_biInf_of_nat {p : ℕ → Prop} {u : ℕ → α} :
bliminf u atTop p = ⨆ i, ⨅ (j) (_ : p j ∧ i ≤ j), u j :=
@blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup_of_nat αᵒᵈ _ p u
theorem limsup_eq_sInf_sSup {ι R : Type*} (F : Filter ι) [CompleteLattice R] (a : ι → R) :
limsup a F = sInf ((fun I => sSup (a '' I)) '' F.sets) := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [limsup_eq]
refine sInf_le_sInf fun x hx => ?_
rcases (mem_image _ F.sets x).mp hx with ⟨I, ⟨I_mem_F, hI⟩⟩
filter_upwards [I_mem_F] with i hi
exact hI ▸ le_sSup (mem_image_of_mem _ hi)
· refine le_sInf fun b hb => sInf_le_of_le (mem_image_of_mem _ hb) <| sSup_le ?_
rintro _ ⟨_, h, rfl⟩
exact h
theorem liminf_eq_sSup_sInf {ι R : Type*} (F : Filter ι) [CompleteLattice R] (a : ι → R) :
liminf a F = sSup ((fun I => sInf (a '' I)) '' F.sets) :=
@Filter.limsup_eq_sInf_sSup ι (OrderDual R) _ _ a
theorem liminf_le_of_frequently_le' {α β} [CompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u : α → β} {x : β}
(h : ∃ᶠ a in f, u a ≤ x) : liminf u f ≤ x := by
rw [liminf_eq]
refine sSup_le fun b hb => ?_
have hbx : ∃ᶠ _ in f, b ≤ x := by
revert h
rw [← not_imp_not, not_frequently, not_frequently]
exact fun h => hb.mp (h.mono fun a hbx hba hax => hbx (hba.trans hax))
exact hbx.exists.choose_spec
theorem le_limsup_of_frequently_le' {α β} [CompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u : α → β} {x : β}
(h : ∃ᶠ a in f, x ≤ u a) : x ≤ limsup u f :=
liminf_le_of_frequently_le' (β := βᵒᵈ) h
/-- If `f : α → α` is a morphism of complete lattices, then the limsup of its iterates of any
`a : α` is a fixed point. -/
@[simp]
theorem _root_.CompleteLatticeHom.apply_limsup_iterate (f : CompleteLatticeHom α α) (a : α) :
f (limsup (fun n => f^[n] a) atTop) = limsup (fun n => f^[n] a) atTop := by
rw [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat', map_iInf]
simp_rw [_root_.map_iSup, ← Function.comp_apply (f := f), ← Function.iterate_succ' f,
← Nat.add_succ]
conv_rhs => rw [iInf_split _ (0 < ·)]
simp only [not_lt, Nat.le_zero, iInf_iInf_eq_left, add_zero, iInf_nat_gt_zero_eq, left_eq_inf]
refine (iInf_le (fun i => ⨆ j, f^[j + (i + 1)] a) 0).trans ?_
simp only [zero_add, Function.comp_apply, iSup_le_iff]
exact fun i => le_iSup (fun i => f^[i] a) (i + 1)
/-- If `f : α → α` is a morphism of complete lattices, then the liminf of its iterates of any
`a : α` is a fixed point. -/
theorem _root_.CompleteLatticeHom.apply_liminf_iterate (f : CompleteLatticeHom α α) (a : α) :
f (liminf (fun n => f^[n] a) atTop) = liminf (fun n => f^[n] a) atTop :=
(CompleteLatticeHom.dual f).apply_limsup_iterate _
variable {f g : Filter β} {p q : β → Prop} {u v : β → α}
theorem blimsup_mono (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) : blimsup u f p ≤ blimsup u f q :=
sInf_le_sInf fun a ha => ha.mono <| by tauto
theorem bliminf_antitone (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) : bliminf u f q ≤ bliminf u f p :=
sSup_le_sSup fun a ha => ha.mono <| by tauto
theorem mono_blimsup' (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → u x ≤ v x) : blimsup u f p ≤ blimsup v f p :=
sInf_le_sInf fun _ ha => (ha.and h).mono fun _ hx hx' => (hx.2 hx').trans (hx.1 hx')
theorem mono_blimsup (h : ∀ x, p x → u x ≤ v x) : blimsup u f p ≤ blimsup v f p :=
mono_blimsup' <| Eventually.of_forall h
theorem mono_bliminf' (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → u x ≤ v x) : bliminf u f p ≤ bliminf v f p :=
sSup_le_sSup fun _ ha => (ha.and h).mono fun _ hx hx' => (hx.1 hx').trans (hx.2 hx')
theorem mono_bliminf (h : ∀ x, p x → u x ≤ v x) : bliminf u f p ≤ bliminf v f p :=
mono_bliminf' <| Eventually.of_forall h
theorem bliminf_antitone_filter (h : f ≤ g) : bliminf u g p ≤ bliminf u f p :=
sSup_le_sSup fun _ ha => ha.filter_mono h
theorem blimsup_monotone_filter (h : f ≤ g) : blimsup u f p ≤ blimsup u g p :=
sInf_le_sInf fun _ ha => ha.filter_mono h
theorem blimsup_and_le_inf : (blimsup u f fun x => p x ∧ q x) ≤ blimsup u f p ⊓ blimsup u f q :=
le_inf (blimsup_mono <| by tauto) (blimsup_mono <| by tauto)
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_inf_aux_left :
(blimsup u f fun x => p x ∧ q x) ≤ blimsup u f p :=
blimsup_and_le_inf.trans inf_le_left
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_inf_aux_right :
(blimsup u f fun x => p x ∧ q x) ≤ blimsup u f q :=
blimsup_and_le_inf.trans inf_le_right
theorem bliminf_sup_le_and : bliminf u f p ⊔ bliminf u f q ≤ bliminf u f fun x => p x ∧ q x :=
blimsup_and_le_inf (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_and_aux_left : bliminf u f p ≤ bliminf u f fun x => p x ∧ q x :=
le_sup_left.trans bliminf_sup_le_and
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_and_aux_right : bliminf u f q ≤ bliminf u f fun x => p x ∧ q x :=
le_sup_right.trans bliminf_sup_le_and
/-- See also `Filter.blimsup_or_eq_sup`. -/
theorem blimsup_sup_le_or : blimsup u f p ⊔ blimsup u f q ≤ blimsup u f fun x => p x ∨ q x :=
sup_le (blimsup_mono <| by tauto) (blimsup_mono <| by tauto)
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_or_aux_left : blimsup u f p ≤ blimsup u f fun x => p x ∨ q x :=
le_sup_left.trans blimsup_sup_le_or
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_or_aux_right : blimsup u f q ≤ blimsup u f fun x => p x ∨ q x :=
le_sup_right.trans blimsup_sup_le_or
/-- See also `Filter.bliminf_or_eq_inf`. -/
theorem bliminf_or_le_inf : (bliminf u f fun x => p x ∨ q x) ≤ bliminf u f p ⊓ bliminf u f q :=
blimsup_sup_le_or (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_or_le_inf_aux_left : (bliminf u f fun x => p x ∨ q x) ≤ bliminf u f p :=
bliminf_or_le_inf.trans inf_le_left
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_or_le_inf_aux_right : (bliminf u f fun x => p x ∨ q x) ≤ bliminf u f q :=
bliminf_or_le_inf.trans inf_le_right
theorem _root_.OrderIso.apply_blimsup [CompleteLattice γ] (e : α ≃o γ) :
e (blimsup u f p) = blimsup (e ∘ u) f p := by
simp only [blimsup_eq, map_sInf, Function.comp_apply, e.image_eq_preimage,
Set.preimage_setOf_eq, e.le_symm_apply]
theorem _root_.OrderIso.apply_bliminf [CompleteLattice γ] (e : α ≃o γ) :
e (bliminf u f p) = bliminf (e ∘ u) f p :=
e.dual.apply_blimsup
theorem _root_.sSupHom.apply_blimsup_le [CompleteLattice γ] (g : sSupHom α γ) :
g (blimsup u f p) ≤ blimsup (g ∘ u) f p := by
simp only [blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup, Function.comp]
refine ((OrderHomClass.mono g).map_iInf₂_le _).trans ?_
simp only [_root_.map_iSup, le_refl]
theorem _root_.sInfHom.le_apply_bliminf [CompleteLattice γ] (g : sInfHom α γ) :
bliminf (g ∘ u) f p ≤ g (bliminf u f p) :=
(sInfHom.dual g).apply_blimsup_le
end CompleteLattice
section CompleteDistribLattice
variable [CompleteDistribLattice α] {f : Filter β} {p q : β → Prop} {u : β → α}
lemma limsup_sup_filter {g} : limsup u (f ⊔ g) = limsup u f ⊔ limsup u g := by
refine le_antisymm ?_
(sup_le (limsup_le_limsup_of_le le_sup_left) (limsup_le_limsup_of_le le_sup_right))
simp_rw [limsup_eq, sInf_sup_eq, sup_sInf_eq, mem_setOf_eq, le_iInf₂_iff]
intro a ha b hb
exact sInf_le ⟨ha.mono fun _ h ↦ h.trans le_sup_left, hb.mono fun _ h ↦ h.trans le_sup_right⟩
lemma liminf_sup_filter {g} : liminf u (f ⊔ g) = liminf u f ⊓ liminf u g :=
limsup_sup_filter (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp]
theorem blimsup_or_eq_sup : (blimsup u f fun x => p x ∨ q x) = blimsup u f p ⊔ blimsup u f q := by
simp only [blimsup_eq_limsup, ← limsup_sup_filter, ← inf_sup_left, sup_principal, setOf_or]
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_or_eq_inf : (bliminf u f fun x => p x ∨ q x) = bliminf u f p ⊓ bliminf u f q :=
blimsup_or_eq_sup (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp]
lemma blimsup_sup_not : blimsup u f p ⊔ blimsup u f (¬p ·) = limsup u f := by
simp_rw [← blimsup_or_eq_sup, or_not, blimsup_true]
@[simp]
lemma bliminf_inf_not : bliminf u f p ⊓ bliminf u f (¬p ·) = liminf u f :=
blimsup_sup_not (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp]
lemma blimsup_not_sup : blimsup u f (¬p ·) ⊔ blimsup u f p = limsup u f := by
simpa only [not_not] using blimsup_sup_not (p := (¬p ·))
@[simp]
lemma bliminf_not_inf : bliminf u f (¬p ·) ⊓ bliminf u f p = liminf u f :=
blimsup_not_sup (α := αᵒᵈ)
lemma limsup_piecewise {s : Set β} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] {v} :
limsup (s.piecewise u v) f = blimsup u f (· ∈ s) ⊔ blimsup v f (· ∉ s) := by
rw [← blimsup_sup_not (p := (· ∈ s))]
refine congr_arg₂ _ (blimsup_congr ?_) (blimsup_congr ?_) <;>
filter_upwards with _ h using by simp [h]
lemma liminf_piecewise {s : Set β} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] {v} :
liminf (s.piecewise u v) f = bliminf u f (· ∈ s) ⊓ bliminf v f (· ∉ s) :=
limsup_piecewise (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem sup_limsup [NeBot f] (a : α) : a ⊔ limsup u f = limsup (fun x => a ⊔ u x) f := by
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup, iSup_sup_eq, sup_iInf₂_eq]
congr; ext s; congr; ext hs; congr
exact (biSup_const (nonempty_of_mem hs)).symm
theorem inf_liminf [NeBot f] (a : α) : a ⊓ liminf u f = liminf (fun x => a ⊓ u x) f :=
sup_limsup (α := αᵒᵈ) a
theorem sup_liminf (a : α) : a ⊔ liminf u f = liminf (fun x => a ⊔ u x) f := by
simp only [liminf_eq_iSup_iInf]
rw [sup_comm, biSup_sup (⟨univ, univ_mem⟩ : ∃ i : Set β, i ∈ f)]
simp_rw [iInf₂_sup_eq, sup_comm (a := a)]
theorem inf_limsup (a : α) : a ⊓ limsup u f = limsup (fun x => a ⊓ u x) f :=
sup_liminf (α := αᵒᵈ) a
end CompleteDistribLattice
section CompleteBooleanAlgebra
variable [CompleteBooleanAlgebra α] (f : Filter β) (u : β → α)
theorem limsup_compl : (limsup u f)ᶜ = liminf (compl ∘ u) f := by
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup, compl_iInf, compl_iSup, liminf_eq_iSup_iInf, Function.comp_apply]
theorem liminf_compl : (liminf u f)ᶜ = limsup (compl ∘ u) f := by
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup, compl_iInf, compl_iSup, liminf_eq_iSup_iInf, Function.comp_apply]
theorem limsup_sdiff (a : α) : limsup u f \ a = limsup (fun b => u b \ a) f := by
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup, sdiff_eq]
rw [biInf_inf (⟨univ, univ_mem⟩ : ∃ i : Set β, i ∈ f)]
simp_rw [inf_comm, inf_iSup₂_eq, inf_comm]
theorem liminf_sdiff [NeBot f] (a : α) : liminf u f \ a = liminf (fun b => u b \ a) f := by
simp only [sdiff_eq, inf_comm _ aᶜ, inf_liminf]
theorem sdiff_limsup [NeBot f] (a : α) : a \ limsup u f = liminf (fun b => a \ u b) f := by
rw [← compl_inj_iff]
simp only [sdiff_eq, liminf_compl, comp_def, compl_inf, compl_compl, sup_limsup]
theorem sdiff_liminf (a : α) : a \ liminf u f = limsup (fun b => a \ u b) f := by
rw [← compl_inj_iff]
simp only [sdiff_eq, limsup_compl, comp_def, compl_inf, compl_compl, sup_liminf]
end CompleteBooleanAlgebra
section SetLattice
variable {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} {𝓕 : Filter ι} {a : α}
lemma mem_liminf_iff_eventually_mem : (a ∈ liminf s 𝓕) ↔ (∀ᶠ i in 𝓕, a ∈ s i) := by
simpa only [liminf_eq_iSup_iInf, iSup_eq_iUnion, iInf_eq_iInter, mem_iUnion, mem_iInter]
using ⟨fun ⟨S, hS, hS'⟩ ↦ mem_of_superset hS (by tauto), fun h ↦ ⟨{i | a ∈ s i}, h, by tauto⟩⟩
lemma mem_limsup_iff_frequently_mem : (a ∈ limsup s 𝓕) ↔ (∃ᶠ i in 𝓕, a ∈ s i) := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, iff_not_comm, ← mem_compl_iff, limsup_compl, comp_apply,
mem_liminf_iff_eventually_mem]
theorem cofinite.blimsup_set_eq :
blimsup s cofinite p = { x | { n | p n ∧ x ∈ s n }.Infinite } := by
simp only [blimsup_eq, le_eq_subset, eventually_cofinite, not_forall, sInf_eq_sInter, exists_prop]
ext x
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun hx t h => ?_⟩ <;> contrapose! h
· simp only [mem_sInter, mem_setOf_eq, not_forall, exists_prop]
exact ⟨{x}ᶜ, by simpa using h, by simp⟩
· exact hx.mono fun i hi => ⟨hi.1, fun hit => h (hit hi.2)⟩
theorem cofinite.bliminf_set_eq : bliminf s cofinite p = { x | { n | p n ∧ x ∉ s n }.Finite } := by
rw [← compl_inj_iff]
simp only [bliminf_eq_iSup_biInf, compl_iInf, compl_iSup, ← blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup,
cofinite.blimsup_set_eq]
rfl
/-- In other words, `limsup cofinite s` is the set of elements lying inside the family `s`
infinitely often. -/
theorem cofinite.limsup_set_eq : limsup s cofinite = { x | { n | x ∈ s n }.Infinite } := by
simp only [← cofinite.blimsup_true s, cofinite.blimsup_set_eq, true_and]
/-- In other words, `liminf cofinite s` is the set of elements lying outside the family `s`
finitely often. -/
theorem cofinite.liminf_set_eq : liminf s cofinite = { x | { n | x ∉ s n }.Finite } := by
simp only [← cofinite.bliminf_true s, cofinite.bliminf_set_eq, true_and]
theorem exists_forall_mem_of_hasBasis_mem_blimsup {l : Filter β} {b : ι → Set β} {q : ι → Prop}
(hl : l.HasBasis q b) {u : β → Set α} {p : β → Prop} {x : α} (hx : x ∈ blimsup u l p) :
∃ f : { i | q i } → β, ∀ i, x ∈ u (f i) ∧ p (f i) ∧ f i ∈ b i := by
rw [blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup] at hx
simp only [iSup_eq_iUnion, iInf_eq_iInter, mem_iInter, mem_iUnion, exists_prop] at hx
choose g hg hg' using hx
refine ⟨fun i : { i | q i } => g (b i) (hl.mem_of_mem i.2), fun i => ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· exact hg' (b i) (hl.mem_of_mem i.2)
· exact hg (b i) (hl.mem_of_mem i.2)
theorem exists_forall_mem_of_hasBasis_mem_blimsup' {l : Filter β} {b : ι → Set β}
(hl : l.HasBasis (fun _ => True) b) {u : β → Set α} {p : β → Prop} {x : α}
(hx : x ∈ blimsup u l p) : ∃ f : ι → β, ∀ i, x ∈ u (f i) ∧ p (f i) ∧ f i ∈ b i := by
obtain ⟨f, hf⟩ := exists_forall_mem_of_hasBasis_mem_blimsup hl hx
exact ⟨fun i => f ⟨i, trivial⟩, fun i => hf ⟨i, trivial⟩⟩
end SetLattice
section ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder
theorem frequently_lt_of_lt_limsSup {f : Filter α} [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] {a : α}
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : a < limsSup f) : ∃ᶠ n in f, a < n := by
contrapose! h
simp only [not_frequently, not_lt] at h
exact limsSup_le_of_le hf h
theorem frequently_lt_of_limsInf_lt {f : Filter α} [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] {a : α}
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : limsInf f < a) : ∃ᶠ n in f, n < a :=
frequently_lt_of_lt_limsSup (α := OrderDual α) hf h
theorem eventually_lt_of_lt_liminf {f : Filter α} [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] {u : α → β}
{b : β} (h : b < liminf u f)
(hu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
∀ᶠ a in f, b < u a := by
obtain ⟨c, hc, hbc⟩ : ∃ (c : β) (_ : c ∈ { c : β | ∀ᶠ n : α in f, c ≤ u n }), b < c := by
simp_rw [exists_prop]
exact exists_lt_of_lt_csSup hu h
exact hc.mono fun x hx => lt_of_lt_of_le hbc hx
theorem eventually_lt_of_limsup_lt {f : Filter α} [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] {u : α → β}
{b : β} (h : limsup u f < b)
(hu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
∀ᶠ a in f, u a < b :=
eventually_lt_of_lt_liminf (β := βᵒᵈ) h hu
section ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α]
/-- If `Filter.limsup u atTop ≤ x`, then for all `ε > 0`, eventually we have `u b < x + ε`. -/
theorem eventually_lt_add_pos_of_limsup_le [Preorder β] [AddZeroClass α] [AddLeftStrictMono α]
{x ε : α} {u : β → α} (hu_bdd : IsBoundedUnder LE.le atTop u) (hu : Filter.limsup u atTop ≤ x)
(hε : 0 < ε) :
∀ᶠ b : β in atTop, u b < x + ε :=
eventually_lt_of_limsup_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt hu (lt_add_of_pos_right x hε)) hu_bdd
/-- If `x ≤ Filter.liminf u atTop`, then for all `ε < 0`, eventually we have `x + ε < u b`. -/
theorem eventually_add_neg_lt_of_le_liminf [Preorder β] [AddZeroClass α] [AddLeftStrictMono α]
{x ε : α} {u : β → α} (hu_bdd : IsBoundedUnder GE.ge atTop u) (hu : x ≤ Filter.liminf u atTop)
(hε : ε < 0) :
∀ᶠ b : β in atTop, x + ε < u b :=
eventually_lt_of_lt_liminf (lt_of_lt_of_le (add_lt_of_neg_right x hε) hu) hu_bdd
/-- If `Filter.limsup u atTop ≤ x`, then for all `ε > 0`, there exists a positive natural
number `n` such that `u n < x + ε`. -/
theorem exists_lt_of_limsup_le [AddZeroClass α] [AddLeftStrictMono α] {x ε : α} {u : ℕ → α}
(hu_bdd : IsBoundedUnder LE.le atTop u) (hu : Filter.limsup u atTop ≤ x) (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ n : PNat, u n < x + ε := by
have h : ∀ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop, u n < x + ε := eventually_lt_add_pos_of_limsup_le hu_bdd hu hε
simp only [eventually_atTop] at h
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := h
exact ⟨⟨n + 1, Nat.succ_pos _⟩, hn (n + 1) (Nat.le_succ _)⟩
/-- If `x ≤ Filter.liminf u atTop`, then for all `ε < 0`, there exists a positive natural
number `n` such that ` x + ε < u n`. -/
theorem exists_lt_of_le_liminf [AddZeroClass α] [AddLeftStrictMono α] {x ε : α} {u : ℕ → α}
(hu_bdd : IsBoundedUnder GE.ge atTop u) (hu : x ≤ Filter.liminf u atTop) (hε : ε < 0) :
∃ n : PNat, x + ε < u n := by
have h : ∀ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop, x + ε < u n := eventually_add_neg_lt_of_le_liminf hu_bdd hu hε
simp only [eventually_atTop] at h
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := h
exact ⟨⟨n + 1, Nat.succ_pos _⟩, hn (n + 1) (Nat.le_succ _)⟩
end ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] {f : Filter α} {u : α → β}
theorem le_limsup_of_frequently_le {b : β} (hu_le : ∃ᶠ x in f, b ≤ u x)
(hu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
b ≤ limsup u f := by
revert hu_le
rw [← not_imp_not, not_frequently]
simp_rw [← lt_iff_not_ge]
exact fun h => eventually_lt_of_limsup_lt h hu
theorem liminf_le_of_frequently_le {b : β} (hu_le : ∃ᶠ x in f, u x ≤ b)
(hu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ b :=
le_limsup_of_frequently_le (β := βᵒᵈ) hu_le hu
theorem frequently_lt_of_lt_limsup {b : β}
(hu : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : b < limsup u f) : ∃ᶠ x in f, b < u x := by
contrapose! h
apply limsSup_le_of_le hu
simpa using h
theorem frequently_lt_of_liminf_lt {b : β}
(hu : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : liminf u f < b) : ∃ᶠ x in f, u x < b :=
frequently_lt_of_lt_limsup (β := βᵒᵈ) hu h
theorem limsup_le_iff {x : β} (h₁ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsup u f ≤ x ↔ ∀ y > x, ∀ᶠ a in f, u a < y := by
refine ⟨fun h _ h' ↦ eventually_lt_of_limsup_lt (h.trans_lt h') h₂, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
--Two cases: Either `x` is a cluster point from above, or it is not.
--In the first case, we use `forall_lt_iff_le'` and split an interval.
--In the second case, the function `u` must eventually be smaller or equal to `x`.
by_cases h' : ∀ y > x, ∃ z, x < z ∧ z < y
· rw [← forall_lt_iff_le']
intro y x_y
rcases h' y x_y with ⟨z, x_z, z_y⟩
exact (limsup_le_of_le h₁ ((h z x_z).mono (fun _ ↦ le_of_lt))).trans_lt z_y
· apply limsup_le_of_le h₁
set_option push_neg.use_distrib true in push_neg at h'
rcases h' with ⟨z, x_z, hz⟩
exact (h z x_z).mono <| fun w hw ↦ (or_iff_left (not_le_of_lt hw)).1 (hz (u w))
/- A version of `limsup_le_iff` with large inequalities in densely ordered spaces.-/
lemma limsup_le_iff' [DenselyOrdered β] {x : β}
(h₁ : IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) f u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) f u := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsup u f ≤ x ↔ ∀ y > x, ∀ᶠ (a : α) in f, u a ≤ y := by
refine ⟨fun h _ h' ↦ (eventually_lt_of_limsup_lt (h.trans_lt h') h₂).mono fun _ ↦ le_of_lt, ?_⟩
rw [← forall_lt_iff_le']
intro h y x_y
obtain ⟨z, x_z, z_y⟩ := exists_between x_y
exact (limsup_le_of_le h₁ (h z x_z)).trans_lt z_y
theorem le_limsup_iff {x : β} (h₁ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
x ≤ limsup u f ↔ ∀ y < x, ∃ᶠ a in f, y < u a := by
refine ⟨fun h _ h' ↦ frequently_lt_of_lt_limsup h₁ (h'.trans_le h), fun h ↦ ?_⟩
--Two cases: Either `x` is a cluster point from below, or it is not.
--In the first case, we use `forall_lt_iff_le` and split an interval.
--In the second case, the function `u` must frequently be larger or equal to `x`.
by_cases h' : ∀ y < x, ∃ z, y < z ∧ z < x
· rw [← forall_lt_iff_le]
intro y y_x
obtain ⟨z, y_z, z_x⟩ := h' y y_x
exact y_z.trans_le (le_limsup_of_frequently_le ((h z z_x).mono (fun _ ↦ le_of_lt)) h₂)
· apply le_limsup_of_frequently_le _ h₂
set_option push_neg.use_distrib true in push_neg at h'
rcases h' with ⟨z, z_x, hz⟩
exact (h z z_x).mono <| fun w hw ↦ (or_iff_right (not_le_of_lt hw)).1 (hz (u w))
/- A version of `le_limsup_iff` with large inequalities in densely ordered spaces.-/
lemma le_limsup_iff' [DenselyOrdered β] {x : β}
(h₁ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
x ≤ limsup u f ↔ ∀ y < x, ∃ᶠ a in f, y ≤ u a := by
refine ⟨fun h _ h' ↦ (frequently_lt_of_lt_limsup h₁ (h'.trans_le h)).mono fun _ ↦ le_of_lt, ?_⟩
rw [← forall_lt_iff_le]
intro h y y_x
obtain ⟨z, y_z, z_x⟩ := exists_between y_x
exact y_z.trans_le (le_limsup_of_frequently_le (h z z_x) h₂)
theorem le_liminf_iff {x : β} (h₁ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
x ≤ liminf u f ↔ ∀ y < x, ∀ᶠ a in f, y < u a := limsup_le_iff (β := βᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂
/- A version of `le_liminf_iff` with large inequalities in densely ordered spaces.-/
theorem le_liminf_iff' [DenselyOrdered β] {x : β}
(h₁ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
x ≤ liminf u f ↔ ∀ y < x, ∀ᶠ a in f, y ≤ u a := limsup_le_iff' (β := βᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂
theorem liminf_le_iff {x : β} (h₁ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ x ↔ ∀ y > x, ∃ᶠ a in f, u a < y := le_limsup_iff (β := βᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂
/- A version of `liminf_le_iff` with large inequalities in densely ordered spaces.-/
theorem liminf_le_iff' [DenselyOrdered β] {x : β}
(h₁ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ x ↔ ∀ y > x, ∃ᶠ a in f, u a ≤ y := le_limsup_iff' (β := βᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂
lemma liminf_le_limsup_of_frequently_le {v : α → β} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, u x ≤ v x)
(h₁ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ limsup v f := by
rcases f.eq_or_neBot with rfl | _
· exact (frequently_bot h).rec
have h₃ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := h₂.eventually_le
apply IsCoboundedUnder.of_frequently_le (a := a)
exact (h.and_eventually ha).mono fun x ⟨u_x, v_x⟩ ↦ u_x.trans v_x
have h₄ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) v := by
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := h₁.eventually_ge
apply IsCoboundedUnder.of_frequently_ge (a := a)
exact (ha.and_frequently h).mono fun x ⟨u_x, v_x⟩ ↦ u_x.trans v_x
refine (le_limsup_iff h₄ h₂).2 fun y y_v ↦ ?_
have := (le_liminf_iff h₃ h₁).1 (le_refl (liminf u f)) y y_v
exact (h.and_eventually this).mono fun x ⟨ux_vx, y_ux⟩ ↦ y_ux.trans_le ux_vx
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] {f : Filter α} {b : α}
-- The linter erroneously claims that I'm not referring to `c`
set_option linter.unusedVariables false in
theorem lt_mem_sets_of_limsSup_lt (h : f.IsBounded (· ≤ ·)) (l : f.limsSup < b) :
∀ᶠ a in f, a < b :=
let ⟨c, (h : ∀ᶠ a in f, a ≤ c), hcb⟩ := exists_lt_of_csInf_lt h l
mem_of_superset h fun _a => hcb.trans_le'
theorem gt_mem_sets_of_limsInf_gt : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) → b < f.limsInf → ∀ᶠ a in f, b < a :=
@lt_mem_sets_of_limsSup_lt αᵒᵈ _ _ _
section Classical
open Classical in
/-- Given an indexed family of sets `s j` over `j : Subtype p` and a function `f`, then
`liminf_reparam j` is equal to `j` if `f` is bounded below on `s j`, and otherwise to some
index `k` such that `f` is bounded below on `s k` (if there exists one).
To ensure good measurability behavior, this index `k` is chosen as the minimal suitable index.
This function is used to write down a liminf in a measurable way,
in `Filter.HasBasis.liminf_eq_ciSup_ciInf` and `Filter.HasBasis.liminf_eq_ite`. -/
noncomputable def liminf_reparam
(f : ι → α) (s : ι' → Set ι) (p : ι' → Prop) [Countable (Subtype p)] [Nonempty (Subtype p)]
(j : Subtype p) : Subtype p :=
let m : Set (Subtype p) := {j | BddBelow (range (fun (i : s j) ↦ f i))}
let g : ℕ → Subtype p := (exists_surjective_nat _).choose
have Z : ∃ n, g n ∈ m ∨ ∀ j, j ∉ m := by
by_cases H : ∃ j, j ∈ m
· rcases H with ⟨j, hj⟩
rcases (exists_surjective_nat (Subtype p)).choose_spec j with ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n, Or.inl hj⟩
· push_neg at H
exact ⟨0, Or.inr H⟩
if j ∈ m then j else g (Nat.find Z)
/-- Writing a liminf as a supremum of infimum, in a (possibly non-complete) conditionally complete
linear order. A reparametrization trick is needed to avoid taking the infimum of sets which are
not bounded below. -/
theorem HasBasis.liminf_eq_ciSup_ciInf {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} [Countable (Subtype p)] [Nonempty (Subtype p)]
(hv : v.HasBasis p s) {f : ι → α} (hs : ∀ (j : Subtype p), (s j).Nonempty)
(H : ∃ (j : Subtype p), BddBelow (range (fun (i : s j) ↦ f i))) :
liminf f v = ⨆ (j : Subtype p), ⨅ (i : s (liminf_reparam f s p j)), f i := by
classical
rcases H with ⟨j0, hj0⟩
let m : Set (Subtype p) := {j | BddBelow (range (fun (i : s j) ↦ f i))}
have : ∀ (j : Subtype p), Nonempty (s j) := fun j ↦ Nonempty.coe_sort (hs j)
have A : ⋃ (j : Subtype p), ⋂ (i : s j), Iic (f i) =
⋃ (j : Subtype p), ⋂ (i : s (liminf_reparam f s p j)), Iic (f i) := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· apply iUnion_subset (fun j ↦ ?_)
by_cases hj : j ∈ m
· have : j = liminf_reparam f s p j := by simp only [m, liminf_reparam, hj, ite_true]
conv_lhs => rw [this]
apply subset_iUnion _ j
· simp only [m, mem_setOf_eq, ← nonempty_iInter_Iic_iff, not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty] at hj
simp only [hj, empty_subset]
· apply iUnion_subset (fun j ↦ ?_)
exact subset_iUnion (fun (k : Subtype p) ↦ (⋂ (i : s k), Iic (f i))) (liminf_reparam f s p j)
have B : ∀ (j : Subtype p), ⋂ (i : s (liminf_reparam f s p j)), Iic (f i) =
Iic (⨅ (i : s (liminf_reparam f s p j)), f i) := by
intro j
apply (Iic_ciInf _).symm
change liminf_reparam f s p j ∈ m
by_cases Hj : j ∈ m
· simpa only [m, liminf_reparam, if_pos Hj] using Hj
· simp only [m, liminf_reparam, if_neg Hj]
have Z : ∃ n, (exists_surjective_nat (Subtype p)).choose n ∈ m ∨ ∀ j, j ∉ m := by
rcases (exists_surjective_nat (Subtype p)).choose_spec j0 with ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n, Or.inl hj0⟩
rcases Nat.find_spec Z with hZ|hZ
· exact hZ
· exact (hZ j0 hj0).elim
simp_rw [hv.liminf_eq_sSup_iUnion_iInter, A, B, sSup_iUnion_Iic]
open Classical in
/-- Writing a liminf as a supremum of infimum, in a (possibly non-complete) conditionally complete
linear order. A reparametrization trick is needed to avoid taking the infimum of sets which are
not bounded below. -/
theorem HasBasis.liminf_eq_ite {v : Filter ι} {p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι}
[Countable (Subtype p)] [Nonempty (Subtype p)] (hv : v.HasBasis p s) (f : ι → α) :
liminf f v = if ∃ (j : Subtype p), s j = ∅ then sSup univ else
if ∀ (j : Subtype p), ¬BddBelow (range (fun (i : s j) ↦ f i)) then sSup ∅
else ⨆ (j : Subtype p), ⨅ (i : s (liminf_reparam f s p j)), f i := by
by_cases H : ∃ (j : Subtype p), s j = ∅
· rw [if_pos H]
rcases H with ⟨j, hj⟩
simp [hv.liminf_eq_sSup_univ_of_empty j j.2 hj]
rw [if_neg H]
by_cases H' : ∀ (j : Subtype p), ¬BddBelow (range (fun (i : s j) ↦ f i))
· have A : ∀ (j : Subtype p), ⋂ (i : s j), Iic (f i) = ∅ := by
simp_rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_iInter_Iic_iff]
exact H'
simp_rw [if_pos H', hv.liminf_eq_sSup_iUnion_iInter, A, iUnion_empty]
rw [if_neg H']
apply hv.liminf_eq_ciSup_ciInf
· push_neg at H
simpa only [nonempty_iff_ne_empty] using H
· push_neg at H'
exact H'
/-- Given an indexed family of sets `s j` and a function `f`, then `limsup_reparam j` is equal
to `j` if `f` is bounded above on `s j`, and otherwise to some index `k` such that `f` is bounded
above on `s k` (if there exists one). To ensure good measurability behavior, this index `k` is
chosen as the minimal suitable index. This function is used to write down a limsup in a measurable
way, in `Filter.HasBasis.limsup_eq_ciInf_ciSup` and `Filter.HasBasis.limsup_eq_ite`. -/
noncomputable def limsup_reparam
(f : ι → α) (s : ι' → Set ι) (p : ι' → Prop) [Countable (Subtype p)] [Nonempty (Subtype p)]
(j : Subtype p) : Subtype p :=
liminf_reparam (α := αᵒᵈ) f s p j
/-- Writing a limsup as an infimum of supremum, in a (possibly non-complete) conditionally complete
linear order. A reparametrization trick is needed to avoid taking the supremum of sets which are
not bounded above. -/
theorem HasBasis.limsup_eq_ciInf_ciSup {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} [Countable (Subtype p)] [Nonempty (Subtype p)]
(hv : v.HasBasis p s) {f : ι → α} (hs : ∀ (j : Subtype p), (s j).Nonempty)
(H : ∃ (j : Subtype p), BddAbove (range (fun (i : s j) ↦ f i))) :
limsup f v = ⨅ (j : Subtype p), ⨆ (i : s (limsup_reparam f s p j)), f i :=
HasBasis.liminf_eq_ciSup_ciInf (α := αᵒᵈ) hv hs H
open Classical in
/-- Writing a limsup as an infimum of supremum, in a (possibly non-complete) conditionally complete
linear order. A reparametrization trick is needed to avoid taking the supremum of sets which are
not bounded below. -/
theorem HasBasis.limsup_eq_ite {v : Filter ι} {p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι}
[Countable (Subtype p)] [Nonempty (Subtype p)] (hv : v.HasBasis p s) (f : ι → α) :
limsup f v = if ∃ (j : Subtype p), s j = ∅ then sInf univ else
if ∀ (j : Subtype p), ¬BddAbove (range (fun (i : s j) ↦ f i)) then sInf ∅
else ⨅ (j : Subtype p), ⨆ (i : s (limsup_reparam f s p j)), f i :=
HasBasis.liminf_eq_ite (α := αᵒᵈ) hv f
end Classical
end ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder
end Filter
section Order
theorem GaloisConnection.l_limsup_le [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β]
[ConditionallyCompleteLattice γ] {f : Filter α} {v : α → β} {l : β → γ} {u : γ → β}
(gc : GaloisConnection l u)
(hlv : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) fun x => l (v x) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hv_co : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault) :
l (limsup v f) ≤ limsup (fun x => l (v x)) f := by
refine le_limsSup_of_le hlv fun c hc => ?_
rw [Filter.eventually_map] at hc
simp_rw [gc _ _] at hc ⊢
exact limsSup_le_of_le hv_co hc
theorem OrderIso.limsup_apply {γ} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] [ConditionallyCompleteLattice γ]
{f : Filter α} {u : α → β} (g : β ≃o γ)
(hu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hu_co : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hgu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) fun x => g (u x) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hgu_co : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) fun x => g (u x) := by isBoundedDefault) :
g (limsup u f) = limsup (fun x => g (u x)) f := by
refine le_antisymm ((OrderIso.to_galoisConnection g).l_limsup_le hgu hu_co) ?_
rw [← g.symm.symm_apply_apply <| limsup (fun x => g (u x)) f, g.symm_symm]
refine g.monotone ?_
have hf : u = fun i => g.symm (g (u i)) := funext fun i => (g.symm_apply_apply (u i)).symm
nth_rw 2 [hf]
refine (OrderIso.to_galoisConnection g.symm).l_limsup_le ?_ hgu_co
simp_rw [g.symm_apply_apply]
exact hu
theorem OrderIso.liminf_apply {γ} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] [ConditionallyCompleteLattice γ]
{f : Filter α} {u : α → β} (g : β ≃o γ)
(hu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hu_co : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hgu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) fun x => g (u x) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hgu_co : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) fun x => g (u x) := by isBoundedDefault) :
g (liminf u f) = liminf (fun x => g (u x)) f :=
OrderIso.limsup_apply (β := βᵒᵈ) (γ := γᵒᵈ) g.dual hu hu_co hgu hgu_co
end Order
section MinMax
open Filter
theorem limsup_max [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h₁ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₃ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₄ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsup (fun a ↦ max (u a) (v a)) f = max (limsup u f) (limsup v f) := by
have bddmax := IsBoundedUnder.sup h₃ h₄
have cobddmax := isCoboundedUnder_le_max (v := v) (Or.inl h₁)
apply le_antisymm
· refine (limsup_le_iff cobddmax bddmax).2 (fun b hb ↦ ?_)
have hu := eventually_lt_of_limsup_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt (le_max_left _ _) hb) h₃
have hv := eventually_lt_of_limsup_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt (le_max_right _ _) hb) h₄
refine mem_of_superset (inter_mem hu hv) (fun _ ↦ by simp)
· exact max_le (c := limsup (fun a ↦ max (u a) (v a)) f)
(limsup_le_limsup (Eventually.of_forall (fun a : α ↦ le_max_left (u a) (v a))) h₁ bddmax)
(limsup_le_limsup (Eventually.of_forall (fun a : α ↦ le_max_right (u a) (v a))) h₂ bddmax)
theorem liminf_min [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h₁ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₃ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₄ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf (fun a ↦ min (u a) (v a)) f = min (liminf u f) (liminf v f) :=
limsup_max (β := βᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄
open Finset
theorem limsup_finset_sup' [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] {f : Filter α}
{F : ι → α → β} {s : Finset ι} (hs : s.Nonempty)
(h₁ : ∀ i ∈ s, f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) (F i) := by exact fun _ _ ↦ by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : ∀ i ∈ s, f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) (F i) := by exact fun _ _ ↦ by isBoundedDefault) :
limsup (fun a ↦ sup' s hs (fun i ↦ F i a)) f = sup' s hs (fun i ↦ limsup (F i) f) := by
have bddsup := isBoundedUnder_le_finset_sup' hs h₂
apply le_antisymm
· have h₃ : ∃ i ∈ s, f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) (F i) := by
rcases hs with ⟨i, i_s⟩
use i, i_s
exact h₁ i i_s
have cobddsup := isCoboundedUnder_le_finset_sup' hs h₃
refine (limsup_le_iff cobddsup bddsup).2 (fun b hb ↦ ?_)
rw [eventually_iff_exists_mem]
use ⋂ i ∈ s, {a | F i a < b}
split_ands
· rw [biInter_finset_mem]
suffices key : ∀ i ∈ s, ∀ᶠ a in f, F i a < b from fun i i_s ↦ eventually_iff.1 (key i i_s)
intro i i_s
apply eventually_lt_of_limsup_lt _ (h₂ i i_s)
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (Finset.le_sup' (f := fun i ↦ limsup (F i) f) i_s) hb
· simp only [mem_iInter, mem_setOf_eq, Finset.sup'_apply, sup'_lt_iff, imp_self, implies_true]
· apply Finset.sup'_le hs (fun i ↦ limsup (F i) f)
refine fun i i_s ↦ limsup_le_limsup (Eventually.of_forall (fun a ↦ ?_)) (h₁ i i_s) bddsup
simp only [Finset.sup'_apply, le_sup'_iff]
use i, i_s
theorem limsup_finset_sup [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] [OrderBot β] {f : Filter α}
{F : ι → α → β} {s : Finset ι}
(h₁ : ∀ i ∈ s, f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) (F i) := by exact fun _ _ ↦ by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : ∀ i ∈ s, f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) (F i) := by exact fun _ _ ↦ by isBoundedDefault) :
limsup (fun a ↦ sup s (fun i ↦ F i a)) f = sup s (fun i ↦ limsup (F i) f) := by
rcases eq_or_neBot f with (rfl | _)
· simp [limsup_eq, csInf_univ]
rcases Finset.eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | s_nemp)
· simp only [Finset.sup_apply, sup_empty, limsup_const]
rw [← Finset.sup'_eq_sup s_nemp fun i ↦ limsup (F i) f, ← limsup_finset_sup' s_nemp h₁ h₂]
congr
ext a
exact Eq.symm (Finset.sup'_eq_sup s_nemp (fun i ↦ F i a))
theorem liminf_finset_inf' [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] {f : Filter α}
{F : ι → α → β} {s : Finset ι} (hs : s.Nonempty)
(h₁ : ∀ i ∈ s, f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) (F i) := by exact fun _ _ ↦ by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : ∀ i ∈ s, f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) (F i) := by exact fun _ _ ↦ by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf (fun a ↦ inf' s hs (fun i ↦ F i a)) f = inf' s hs (fun i ↦ liminf (F i) f) :=
limsup_finset_sup' (β := βᵒᵈ) hs h₁ h₂
theorem liminf_finset_inf [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] [OrderTop β] {f : Filter α}
{F : ι → α → β} {s : Finset ι}
(h₁ : ∀ i ∈ s, f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) (F i) := by exact fun _ _ ↦ by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : ∀ i ∈ s, f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) (F i) := by exact fun _ _ ↦ by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf (fun a ↦ inf s (fun i ↦ F i a)) f = inf s (fun i ↦ liminf (F i) f) :=
limsup_finset_sup (β := βᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂
end MinMax
| Mathlib/Order/LiminfLimsup.lean | 1,291 | 1,298 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Justus Springer. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Justus Springer
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Spaces
import Mathlib.Topology.Sheaves.Sheaf
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.DenseSubsite.Basic
/-!
# Coverings and sieves; from sheaves on sites and sheaves on spaces
In this file, we connect coverings in a topological space to sieves in the associated Grothendieck
topology, in preparation of connecting the sheaf condition on sites to the various sheaf conditions
on spaces.
We also specialize results about sheaves on sites to sheaves on spaces; we show that the inclusion
functor from a topological basis to `TopologicalSpace.Opens` is cover dense, that open maps
induce cover preserving functors, and that open embeddings induce continuous functors.
-/
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory TopologicalSpace Topology
universe w v u
namespace TopCat.Presheaf
variable {X : TopCat.{w}}
/-- Given a presieve `R` on `U`, we obtain a covering family of open sets in `X`, by taking as index
type the type of dependent pairs `(V, f)`, where `f : V ⟶ U` is in `R`.
-/
def coveringOfPresieve (U : Opens X) (R : Presieve U) : (ΣV, { f : V ⟶ U // R f }) → Opens X :=
fun f => f.1
@[simp]
theorem coveringOfPresieve_apply (U : Opens X) (R : Presieve U) (f : Σ V, { f : V ⟶ U // R f }) :
coveringOfPresieve U R f = f.1 := rfl
namespace coveringOfPresieve
variable (U : Opens X) (R : Presieve U)
/-- If `R` is a presieve in the grothendieck topology on `Opens X`, the covering family associated
to `R` really is _covering_, i.e. the union of all open sets equals `U`.
-/
theorem iSup_eq_of_mem_grothendieck (hR : Sieve.generate R ∈ Opens.grothendieckTopology X U) :
iSup (coveringOfPresieve U R) = U := by
apply le_antisymm
· refine iSup_le ?_
intro f
exact f.2.1.le
intro x hxU
rw [Opens.coe_iSup, Set.mem_iUnion]
obtain ⟨V, iVU, ⟨W, iVW, iWU, hiWU, -⟩, hxV⟩ := hR x hxU
exact ⟨⟨W, ⟨iWU, hiWU⟩⟩, iVW.le hxV⟩
end coveringOfPresieve
/-- Given a family of opens `U : ι → Opens X` and any open `Y : Opens X`, we obtain a presieve
on `Y` by declaring that a morphism `f : V ⟶ Y` is a member of the presieve if and only if
there exists an index `i : ι` such that `V = U i`.
-/
def presieveOfCoveringAux {ι : Type v} (U : ι → Opens X) (Y : Opens X) : Presieve Y :=
fun V _ => ∃ i, V = U i
/-- Take `Y` to be `iSup U` and obtain a presieve over `iSup U`. -/
def presieveOfCovering {ι : Type v} (U : ι → Opens X) : Presieve (iSup U) :=
presieveOfCoveringAux U (iSup U)
/-- Given a presieve `R` on `Y`, if we take its associated family of opens via
`coveringOfPresieve` (which may not cover `Y` if `R` is not covering), and take
the presieve on `Y` associated to the family of opens via `presieveOfCoveringAux`,
then we get back the original presieve `R`. -/
@[simp]
theorem covering_presieve_eq_self {Y : Opens X} (R : Presieve Y) :
presieveOfCoveringAux (coveringOfPresieve Y R) Y = R := by
funext Z
ext f
exact ⟨fun ⟨⟨_, f', h⟩, rfl⟩ => by rwa [Subsingleton.elim f f'], fun h => ⟨⟨Z, f, h⟩, rfl⟩⟩
namespace presieveOfCovering
variable {ι : Type v} (U : ι → Opens X)
/-- The sieve generated by `presieveOfCovering U` is a member of the grothendieck topology.
-/
theorem mem_grothendieckTopology :
Sieve.generate (presieveOfCovering U) ∈ Opens.grothendieckTopology X (iSup U) := by
intro x hx
obtain ⟨i, hxi⟩ := Opens.mem_iSup.mp hx
exact ⟨U i, Opens.leSupr U i, ⟨U i, 𝟙 _, Opens.leSupr U i, ⟨i, rfl⟩, Category.id_comp _⟩, hxi⟩
/-- An index `i : ι` can be turned into a dependent pair `(V, f)`, where `V` is an open set and
`f : V ⟶ iSup U` is a member of `presieveOfCovering U f`.
-/
def homOfIndex (i : ι) : ΣV, { f : V ⟶ iSup U // presieveOfCovering U f } :=
| ⟨U i, Opens.leSupr U i, i, rfl⟩
/-- By using the axiom of choice, a dependent pair `(V, f)` where `f : V ⟶ iSup U` is a member of
`presieveOfCovering U f` can be turned into an index `i : ι`, such that `V = U i`.
-/
| Mathlib/Topology/Sheaves/SheafCondition/Sites.lean | 103 | 107 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Basic
/-!
# Intervals as multisets
This file defines intervals as multisets.
## Main declarations
In a `LocallyFiniteOrder`,
* `Multiset.Icc`: Closed-closed interval as a multiset.
* `Multiset.Ico`: Closed-open interval as a multiset.
* `Multiset.Ioc`: Open-closed interval as a multiset.
* `Multiset.Ioo`: Open-open interval as a multiset.
In a `LocallyFiniteOrderTop`,
* `Multiset.Ici`: Closed-infinite interval as a multiset.
* `Multiset.Ioi`: Open-infinite interval as a multiset.
In a `LocallyFiniteOrderBot`,
* `Multiset.Iic`: Infinite-open interval as a multiset.
* `Multiset.Iio`: Infinite-closed interval as a multiset.
## TODO
Do we really need this file at all? (March 2024)
-/
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Multiset
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [Preorder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {a b x : α}
/-- The multiset of elements `x` such that `a ≤ x` and `x ≤ b`. Basically `Set.Icc a b` as a
multiset. -/
def Icc (a b : α) : Multiset α := (Finset.Icc a b).val
/-- The multiset of elements `x` such that `a ≤ x` and `x < b`. Basically `Set.Ico a b` as a
multiset. -/
def Ico (a b : α) : Multiset α := (Finset.Ico a b).val
/-- The multiset of elements `x` such that `a < x` and `x ≤ b`. Basically `Set.Ioc a b` as a
multiset. -/
def Ioc (a b : α) : Multiset α := (Finset.Ioc a b).val
/-- The multiset of elements `x` such that `a < x` and `x < b`. Basically `Set.Ioo a b` as a
multiset. -/
def Ioo (a b : α) : Multiset α := (Finset.Ioo a b).val
@[simp] lemma mem_Icc : x ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b := by rw [Icc, ← Finset.mem_def, Finset.mem_Icc]
@[simp] lemma mem_Ico : x ∈ Ico a b ↔ a ≤ x ∧ x < b := by rw [Ico, ← Finset.mem_def, Finset.mem_Ico]
@[simp] lemma mem_Ioc : x ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < x ∧ x ≤ b := by rw [Ioc, ← Finset.mem_def, Finset.mem_Ioc]
@[simp] lemma mem_Ioo : x ∈ Ioo a b ↔ a < x ∧ x < b := by rw [Ioo, ← Finset.mem_def, Finset.mem_Ioo]
end LocallyFiniteOrder
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [Preorder α] [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] {a x : α}
/-- The multiset of elements `x` such that `a ≤ x`. Basically `Set.Ici a` as a multiset. -/
def Ici (a : α) : Multiset α := (Finset.Ici a).val
/-- The multiset of elements `x` such that `a < x`. Basically `Set.Ioi a` as a multiset. -/
def Ioi (a : α) : Multiset α := (Finset.Ioi a).val
@[simp] lemma mem_Ici : x ∈ Ici a ↔ a ≤ x := by rw [Ici, ← Finset.mem_def, Finset.mem_Ici]
@[simp] lemma mem_Ioi : x ∈ Ioi a ↔ a < x := by rw [Ioi, ← Finset.mem_def, Finset.mem_Ioi]
end LocallyFiniteOrderTop
section LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [Preorder α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] {b x : α}
/-- The multiset of elements `x` such that `x ≤ b`. Basically `Set.Iic b` as a multiset. -/
def Iic (b : α) : Multiset α := (Finset.Iic b).val
/-- The multiset of elements `x` such that `x < b`. Basically `Set.Iio b` as a multiset. -/
def Iio (b : α) : Multiset α := (Finset.Iio b).val
@[simp] lemma mem_Iic : x ∈ Iic b ↔ x ≤ b := by rw [Iic, ← Finset.mem_def, Finset.mem_Iic]
@[simp] lemma mem_Iio : x ∈ Iio b ↔ x < b := by rw [Iio, ← Finset.mem_def, Finset.mem_Iio]
end LocallyFiniteOrderBot
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {a b c : α}
theorem nodup_Icc : (Icc a b).Nodup :=
Finset.nodup _
theorem nodup_Ico : (Ico a b).Nodup :=
Finset.nodup _
theorem nodup_Ioc : (Ioc a b).Nodup :=
Finset.nodup _
theorem nodup_Ioo : (Ioo a b).Nodup :=
Finset.nodup _
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_zero_iff : Icc a b = 0 ↔ ¬a ≤ b := by
rw [Icc, Finset.val_eq_zero, Finset.Icc_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_zero_iff : Ico a b = 0 ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [Ico, Finset.val_eq_zero, Finset.Ico_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_zero_iff : Ioc a b = 0 ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [Ioc, Finset.val_eq_zero, Finset.Ioc_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_zero_iff [DenselyOrdered α] : Ioo a b = 0 ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [Ioo, Finset.val_eq_zero, Finset.Ioo_eq_empty_iff]
alias ⟨_, Icc_eq_zero⟩ := Icc_eq_zero_iff
alias ⟨_, Ico_eq_zero⟩ := Ico_eq_zero_iff
alias ⟨_, Ioc_eq_zero⟩ := Ioc_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_zero (h : ¬a < b) : Ioo a b = 0 :=
eq_zero_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _x hx => h ((mem_Ioo.1 hx).1.trans (mem_Ioo.1 hx).2)
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_zero_of_lt (h : b < a) : Icc a b = 0 :=
Icc_eq_zero h.not_le
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_zero_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ico a b = 0 :=
Ico_eq_zero h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_zero_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioc a b = 0 :=
Ioc_eq_zero h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_zero_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioo a b = 0 :=
Ioo_eq_zero h.not_lt
variable (a)
theorem Ico_self : Ico a a = 0 := by rw [Ico, Finset.Ico_self, Finset.empty_val]
theorem Ioc_self : Ioc a a = 0 := by rw [Ioc, Finset.Ioc_self, Finset.empty_val]
theorem Ioo_self : Ioo a a = 0 := by rw [Ioo, Finset.Ioo_self, Finset.empty_val]
variable {a}
theorem left_mem_Icc : a ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b :=
Finset.left_mem_Icc
theorem left_mem_Ico : a ∈ Ico a b ↔ a < b :=
Finset.left_mem_Ico
theorem right_mem_Icc : b ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b :=
Finset.right_mem_Icc
theorem right_mem_Ioc : b ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < b :=
Finset.right_mem_Ioc
theorem left_not_mem_Ioc : a ∉ Ioc a b :=
Finset.left_not_mem_Ioc
theorem left_not_mem_Ioo : a ∉ Ioo a b :=
Finset.left_not_mem_Ioo
theorem right_not_mem_Ico : b ∉ Ico a b :=
Finset.right_not_mem_Ico
theorem right_not_mem_Ioo : b ∉ Ioo a b :=
Finset.right_not_mem_Ioo
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_le_left [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hca : c ≤ a) :
((Ico a b).filter fun x => x < c) = ∅ := by
rw [Ico, ← Finset.filter_val, Finset.Ico_filter_lt_of_le_left hca]
rfl
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_right_le [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hbc : b ≤ c) :
((Ico a b).filter fun x => x < c) = Ico a b := by
rw [Ico, ← Finset.filter_val, Finset.Ico_filter_lt_of_right_le hbc]
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_le_right [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hcb : c ≤ b) :
((Ico a b).filter fun x => x < c) = Ico a c := by
rw [Ico, ← Finset.filter_val, Finset.Ico_filter_lt_of_le_right hcb]
rfl
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_le_left [DecidablePred (c ≤ ·)] (hca : c ≤ a) :
((Ico a b).filter fun x => c ≤ x) = Ico a b := by
rw [Ico, ← Finset.filter_val, Finset.Ico_filter_le_of_le_left hca]
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_right_le [DecidablePred (b ≤ ·)] :
((Ico a b).filter fun x => b ≤ x) = ∅ := by
rw [Ico, ← Finset.filter_val, Finset.Ico_filter_le_of_right_le]
rfl
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_left_le [DecidablePred (c ≤ ·)] (hac : a ≤ c) :
((Ico a b).filter fun x => c ≤ x) = Ico c b := by
rw [Ico, ← Finset.filter_val, Finset.Ico_filter_le_of_left_le hac]
rfl
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem Icc_self (a : α) : Icc a a = {a} := by rw [Icc, Finset.Icc_self, Finset.singleton_val]
theorem Ico_cons_right (h : a ≤ b) : b ::ₘ Ico a b = Icc a b := by
classical
rw [Ico, ← Finset.insert_val_of_not_mem right_not_mem_Ico, Finset.Ico_insert_right h]
rfl
theorem Ioo_cons_left (h : a < b) : a ::ₘ Ioo a b = Ico a b := by
classical
rw [Ioo, ← Finset.insert_val_of_not_mem left_not_mem_Ioo, Finset.Ioo_insert_left h]
rfl
theorem Ico_disjoint_Ico {a b c d : α} (h : b ≤ c) : Disjoint (Ico a b) (Ico c d) :=
disjoint_left.mpr fun hab hbc => by
rw [mem_Ico] at hab hbc
exact hab.2.not_le (h.trans hbc.1)
@[simp]
theorem Ico_inter_Ico_of_le [DecidableEq α] {a b c d : α} (h : b ≤ c) : Ico a b ∩ Ico c d = 0 :=
Multiset.inter_eq_zero_iff_disjoint.2 <| Ico_disjoint_Ico h
theorem Ico_filter_le_left {a b : α} [DecidablePred (· ≤ a)] (hab : a < b) :
((Ico a b).filter fun x => x ≤ a) = {a} := by
rw [Ico, ← Finset.filter_val, Finset.Ico_filter_le_left hab]
rfl
theorem card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one (a b : α) : card (Ico a b) = card (Icc a b) - 1 :=
Finset.card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one _ _
theorem card_Ioc_eq_card_Icc_sub_one (a b : α) : card (Ioc a b) = card (Icc a b) - 1 :=
Finset.card_Ioc_eq_card_Icc_sub_one _ _
theorem card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one (a b : α) : card (Ioo a b) = card (Ico a b) - 1 :=
Finset.card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one _ _
theorem card_Ioo_eq_card_Icc_sub_two (a b : α) : card (Ioo a b) = card (Icc a b) - 2 :=
Finset.card_Ioo_eq_card_Icc_sub_two _ _
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {a b c d : α}
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_iff {a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ : α} (h : a₁ < b₁) :
Ico a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
Finset.Ico_subset_Ico_iff h
theorem Ico_add_Ico_eq_Ico {a b c : α} (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) :
Ico a b + Ico b c = Ico a c := by
rw [add_eq_union_iff_disjoint.2 (Ico_disjoint_Ico le_rfl), Ico, Ico, Ico, ← Finset.union_val,
Finset.Ico_union_Ico_eq_Ico hab hbc]
theorem Ico_inter_Ico : Ico a b ∩ Ico c d = Ico (max a c) (min b d) := by
rw [Ico, Ico, Ico, ← Finset.inter_val, Finset.Ico_inter_Ico]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_filter_lt (a b c : α) : ((Ico a b).filter fun x => x < c) = Ico a (min b c) := by
rw [Ico, Ico, ← Finset.filter_val, Finset.Ico_filter_lt]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_filter_le (a b c : α) : ((Ico a b).filter fun x => c ≤ x) = Ico (max a c) b := by
rw [Ico, Ico, ← Finset.filter_val, Finset.Ico_filter_le]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_sub_Ico_left (a b c : α) : Ico a b - Ico a c = Ico (max a c) b := by
rw [Ico, Ico, Ico, ← Finset.sdiff_val, Finset.Ico_diff_Ico_left]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_sub_Ico_right (a b c : α) : Ico a b - Ico c b = Ico a (min b c) := by
rw [Ico, Ico, Ico, ← Finset.sdiff_val, Finset.Ico_diff_Ico_right]
end LinearOrder
| end Multiset
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Multiset.lean | 299 | 302 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Nat.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.ByContra
/-!
# `lrat_proof` command
Defines a macro for producing SAT proofs from CNF / LRAT files.
These files are commonly used in the SAT community for writing proofs.
Most SAT solvers support export to [DRAT](https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.06229) format,
but this format can be expensive to reconstruct because it requires recomputing all
unit propagation steps. The [LRAT](https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.02353) format solves this
issue by attaching a proof to the deduction of each new clause.
(The L in LRAT stands for Linear time verification.)
There are several verified checkers for the LRAT format, and the program implemented here
makes it possible to use the lean kernel as an LRAT checker as well and expose the results
as a standard propositional theorem.
The input to the `lrat_proof` command is the name of the theorem to define,
and the statement (written in CNF format) and the proof (in LRAT format).
For example:
```
lrat_proof foo
"p cnf 2 4 1 2 0 -1 2 0 1 -2 0 -1 -2 0"
"5 -2 0 4 3 0 5 d 3 4 0 6 1 0 5 1 0 6 d 1 0 7 0 5 2 6 0"
```
produces a theorem:
```
foo : ∀ (a a_1 : Prop), (¬a ∧ ¬a_1 ∨ a ∧ ¬a_1) ∨ ¬a ∧ a_1 ∨ a ∧ a_1
```
* You can see the theorem statement by hovering over the word `foo`.
* You can use the `example` keyword in place of `foo` to avoid generating a theorem.
* You can use the `include_str` macro in place of the two strings
to load CNF / LRAT files from disk.
-/
open Lean hiding Literal
open Std (HashMap)
namespace Sat
/-- A literal is a positive or negative occurrence of an atomic propositional variable.
Note that unlike DIMACS, 0 is a valid variable index. -/
inductive Literal
| pos : Nat → Literal
| neg : Nat → Literal
/-- Construct a literal. Positive numbers are translated to positive literals,
and negative numbers become negative literals. The input is assumed to be nonzero. -/
def Literal.ofInt (i : Int) : Literal :=
if i < 0 then Literal.neg (-i-1).toNat else Literal.pos (i-1).toNat
/-- Swap the polarity of a literal. -/
def Literal.negate : Literal → Literal
| pos i => neg i
| neg i => pos i
instance : ToExpr Literal where
toTypeExpr := mkConst ``Literal
toExpr
| Literal.pos i => mkApp (mkConst ``Literal.pos) (mkRawNatLit i)
| Literal.neg i => mkApp (mkConst ``Literal.neg) (mkRawNatLit i)
/-- A clause is a list of literals, thought of as a disjunction like `a ∨ b ∨ ¬c`. -/
def Clause := List Literal
/-- The empty clause -/
def Clause.nil : Clause := []
/-- Append a literal to a clause. -/
def Clause.cons : Literal → Clause → Clause := List.cons
/-- A formula is a list of clauses, thought of as a conjunction like `(a ∨ b) ∧ c ∧ (¬c ∨ ¬d)`. -/
abbrev Fmla := List Clause
/-- A single clause as a formula. -/
def Fmla.one (c : Clause) : Fmla := [c]
/-- A conjunction of formulas. -/
def Fmla.and (a b : Fmla) : Fmla := a ++ b
/-- Formula `f` subsumes `f'` if all the clauses in `f'` are in `f`.
We use this to prove that all clauses in the formula are subsumed by it. -/
structure Fmla.subsumes (f f' : Fmla) : Prop where
prop : ∀ x, x ∈ f' → x ∈ f
theorem Fmla.subsumes_self (f : Fmla) : f.subsumes f := ⟨fun _ h ↦ h⟩
theorem Fmla.subsumes_left (f f₁ f₂ : Fmla) (H : f.subsumes (f₁.and f₂)) : f.subsumes f₁ :=
⟨fun _ h ↦ H.1 _ <| List.mem_append.2 <| Or.inl h⟩
theorem Fmla.subsumes_right (f f₁ f₂ : Fmla) (H : f.subsumes (f₁.and f₂)) : f.subsumes f₂ :=
⟨fun _ h ↦ H.1 _ <| List.mem_append.2 <| Or.inr h⟩
/-- A valuation is an assignment of values to all the propositional variables. -/
def Valuation := Nat → Prop
/-- `v.neg lit` asserts that literal `lit` is falsified in the valuation. -/
def Valuation.neg (v : Valuation) : Literal → Prop
| Literal.pos i => ¬ v i
| Literal.neg i => v i
/-- `v.satisfies c` asserts that clause `c` satisfied by the valuation.
It is written in a negative way: A clause like `a ∨ ¬b ∨ c` is rewritten as
`¬a → b → ¬c → False`, so we are asserting that it is not the case that
all literals in the clause are falsified. -/
def Valuation.satisfies (v : Valuation) : Clause → Prop
| [] => False
| l::c => v.neg l → v.satisfies c
/-- `v.satisfies_fmla f` asserts that formula `f` is satisfied by the valuation.
A formula is satisfied if all clauses in it are satisfied. -/
structure Valuation.satisfies_fmla (v : Valuation) (f : Fmla) : Prop where
prop : ∀ c, c ∈ f → v.satisfies c
/-- `f.proof c` asserts that `c` is derivable from `f`. -/
def Fmla.proof (f : Fmla) (c : Clause) : Prop :=
∀ v : Valuation, v.satisfies_fmla f → v.satisfies c
/-- If `f` subsumes `c` (i.e. `c ∈ f`), then `f.proof c`. -/
theorem Fmla.proof_of_subsumes {f : Fmla} {c : Clause}
(H : Fmla.subsumes f (Fmla.one c)) : f.proof c :=
fun _ h ↦ h.1 _ <| H.1 _ <| List.Mem.head ..
/-- The core unit-propagation step.
We have a local context of assumptions `¬l'` (sometimes called an assignment)
and we wish to add `¬l` to the context, that is, we want to prove `l` is also falsified.
This is because there is a clause `a ∨ b ∨ ¬l` in the global context
such that all literals in the clause are falsified except for `¬l`;
so in the context `h₁` where we suppose that `¬l` is falsified,
the clause itself is falsified so we can prove `False`.
We continue the proof in `h₂`, with the assumption that `l` is falsified. -/
theorem Valuation.by_cases {v : Valuation} {l}
(h₁ : v.neg l.negate → False) (h₂ : v.neg l → False) : False :=
match l with
| Literal.pos _ => h₂ h₁
| Literal.neg _ => h₁ h₂
/-- `v.implies p [a, b, c] 0` definitionally unfolds to `(v 0 ↔ a) → (v 1 ↔ b) → (v 2 ↔ c) → p`.
This is used to introduce assumptions about the first `n` values of `v` during reification. -/
def Valuation.implies (v : Valuation) (p : Prop) : List Prop → Nat → Prop
| [], _ => p
| a::as, n => (v n ↔ a) → v.implies p as (n+1)
/-- `Valuation.mk [a, b, c]` is a valuation which is `a` at 0, `b` at 1 and `c` at 2, and false
everywhere else. -/
def Valuation.mk : List Prop → Valuation
| [], _ => False
| a::_, 0 => a
| _::as, n+1 => mk as n
/-- The fundamental relationship between `mk` and `implies`:
`(mk ps).implies p ps 0` is equivalent to `p`. -/
theorem Valuation.mk_implies {p} {as ps} (as₁) : as = List.reverseAux as₁ ps →
(Valuation.mk as).implies p ps as₁.length → p := by
induction ps generalizing as₁ with
| nil => exact fun _ ↦ id
| cons a as ih =>
refine fun e H ↦ @ih (a::as₁) e (H ?_)
subst e; clear ih H
suffices ∀ n n', n' = List.length as₁ + n →
∀ bs, mk (as₁.reverseAux bs) n' ↔ mk bs n from this 0 _ rfl (a::as)
induction as₁ with
| nil => simp
| cons b as₁ ih => simpa using fun n bs ↦ ih (n+1) _ (Nat.succ_add ..) _
/-- Asserts that `¬⟦f⟧_v` implies `p`. -/
structure Fmla.reify (v : Valuation) (f : Fmla) (p : Prop) : Prop where
prop : ¬ v.satisfies_fmla f → p
variable {v : Valuation}
/-- If `f` is unsatisfiable, and every `v` which agrees with `ps` implies `¬⟦f⟧_v → p`, then `p`.
Equivalently, there exists a valuation `v` which agrees with `ps`,
| and every such valuation yields `¬⟦f⟧_v` because `f` is unsatisfiable. -/
theorem Fmla.refute {p : Prop} {ps} (f : Fmla) (hf : f.proof [])
(hv : ∀ v, Valuation.implies v (Fmla.reify v f p) ps 0) : p :=
(Valuation.mk_implies [] rfl (hv _)).1 (hf _)
/-- Negation turns AND into OR, so `¬⟦f₁ ∧ f₂⟧_v ≡ ¬⟦f₁⟧_v ∨ ¬⟦f₂⟧_v`. -/
| Mathlib/Tactic/Sat/FromLRAT.lean | 180 | 185 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Finite
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Cauchy
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.IsUniformGroup.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Group.Pointwise
/-!
# Infinite sums and products in topological groups
Lemmas on topological sums in groups (as opposed to monoids).
-/
noncomputable section
open Filter Finset Function
open scoped Topology
variable {α β γ : Type*}
section IsTopologicalGroup
variable [CommGroup α] [TopologicalSpace α] [IsTopologicalGroup α]
variable {f g : β → α} {a a₁ a₂ : α}
-- `by simpa using` speeds up elaboration. Why?
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.inv (h : HasProd f a) : HasProd (fun b ↦ (f b)⁻¹) a⁻¹ := by
simpa only using h.map (MonoidHom.id α)⁻¹ continuous_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.inv (hf : Multipliable f) : Multipliable fun b ↦ (f b)⁻¹ :=
hf.hasProd.inv.multipliable
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.of_inv (hf : Multipliable fun b ↦ (f b)⁻¹) : Multipliable f := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using hf.inv
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_inv_iff : (Multipliable fun b ↦ (f b)⁻¹) ↔ Multipliable f :=
⟨Multipliable.of_inv, Multipliable.inv⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.div (hf : HasProd f a₁) (hg : HasProd g a₂) :
HasProd (fun b ↦ f b / g b) (a₁ / a₂) := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv]
exact hf.mul hg.inv
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.div (hf : Multipliable f) (hg : Multipliable g) :
Multipliable fun b ↦ f b / g b :=
(hf.hasProd.div hg.hasProd).multipliable
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.trans_div (hg : Multipliable g) (hfg : Multipliable fun b ↦ f b / g b) :
Multipliable f := by
simpa only [div_mul_cancel] using hfg.mul hg
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_iff_of_multipliable_div (hfg : Multipliable fun b ↦ f b / g b) :
Multipliable f ↔ Multipliable g :=
⟨fun hf ↦ hf.trans_div <| by simpa only [inv_div] using hfg.inv, fun hg ↦ hg.trans_div hfg⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.update (hf : HasProd f a₁) (b : β) [DecidableEq β] (a : α) :
HasProd (update f b a) (a / f b * a₁) := by
convert (hasProd_ite_eq b (a / f b)).mul hf with b'
by_cases h : b' = b
· rw [h, update_self]
simp [eq_self_iff_true, if_true, sub_add_cancel]
· simp only [h, update_of_ne, if_false, Ne, one_mul, not_false_iff]
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.update (hf : Multipliable f) (b : β) [DecidableEq β] (a : α) :
Multipliable (update f b a) :=
(hf.hasProd.update b a).multipliable
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.hasProd_compl_iff {s : Set β} (hf : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) a₁) :
HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : ↑sᶜ → α) a₂ ↔ HasProd f (a₁ * a₂) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ hf.mul_compl h, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
rw [hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator] at hf ⊢
rw [Set.mulIndicator_compl]
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_inv_cancel_comm] using h.div hf
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.hasProd_iff_compl {s : Set β} (hf : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) a₁) :
HasProd f a₂ ↔ HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : ↑sᶜ → α) (a₂ / a₁) :=
Iff.symm <| hf.hasProd_compl_iff.trans <| by rw [mul_div_cancel]
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.multipliable_compl_iff {s : Set β} (hf : Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : s → α)) :
Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : ↑sᶜ → α) ↔ Multipliable f where
mp := fun ⟨_, ha⟩ ↦ (hf.hasProd.hasProd_compl_iff.1 ha).multipliable
mpr := fun ⟨_, ha⟩ ↦ (hf.hasProd.hasProd_iff_compl.1 ha).multipliable
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Finset.hasProd_compl_iff (s : Finset β) :
HasProd (fun x : { x // x ∉ s } ↦ f x) a ↔ HasProd f (a * ∏ i ∈ s, f i) :=
(s.hasProd f).hasProd_compl_iff.trans <| by rw [mul_comm]
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Finset.hasProd_iff_compl (s : Finset β) :
HasProd f a ↔ HasProd (fun x : { x // x ∉ s } ↦ f x) (a / ∏ i ∈ s, f i) :=
(s.hasProd f).hasProd_iff_compl
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Finset.multipliable_compl_iff (s : Finset β) :
(Multipliable fun x : { x // x ∉ s } ↦ f x) ↔ Multipliable f :=
(s.multipliable f).multipliable_compl_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem Set.Finite.multipliable_compl_iff {s : Set β} (hs : s.Finite) :
Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : ↑sᶜ → α) ↔ Multipliable f :=
(hs.multipliable f).multipliable_compl_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_ite_div_hasProd [DecidableEq β] (hf : HasProd f a) (b : β) :
HasProd (fun n ↦ ite (n = b) 1 (f n)) (a / f b) := by
convert hf.update b 1 using 1
· ext n
rw [Function.update_apply]
· rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, one_mul]
/-- A more general version of `Multipliable.congr`, allowing the functions to
disagree on a finite set.
Note that this requires the target to be a group, and hence fails for products valued
in a ring. See `Multipliable.congr_cofinite₀` for a version applying in this case,
with an additional non-vanishing hypothesis.
-/
@[to_additive "A more general version of `Summable.congr`, allowing the functions to
disagree on a finite set."]
theorem Multipliable.congr_cofinite (hf : Multipliable f) (hfg : f =ᶠ[cofinite] g) :
Multipliable g :=
hfg.multipliable_compl_iff.mp <| (hfg.multipliable_compl_iff.mpr hf).congr (by simp)
/-- A more general version of `multipliable_congr`, allowing the functions to
disagree on a finite set. -/
@[to_additive "A more general version of `summable_congr`, allowing the functions to
disagree on a finite set."]
theorem multipliable_congr_cofinite (hfg : f =ᶠ[cofinite] g) :
Multipliable f ↔ Multipliable g :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.congr_cofinite hfg, fun h ↦ h.congr_cofinite (hfg.mono fun _ h' ↦ h'.symm)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.congr_atTop {f₁ g₁ : ℕ → α} (hf : Multipliable f₁) (hfg : f₁ =ᶠ[atTop] g₁) :
Multipliable g₁ := hf.congr_cofinite (Nat.cofinite_eq_atTop ▸ hfg)
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_congr_atTop {f₁ g₁ : ℕ → α} (hfg : f₁ =ᶠ[atTop] g₁) :
Multipliable f₁ ↔ Multipliable g₁ := multipliable_congr_cofinite (Nat.cofinite_eq_atTop ▸ hfg)
section tprod
variable [T2Space α]
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_inv : ∏' b, (f b)⁻¹ = (∏' b, f b)⁻¹ := by
by_cases hf : Multipliable f
· exact hf.hasProd.inv.tprod_eq
· simp [tprod_eq_one_of_not_multipliable hf,
tprod_eq_one_of_not_multipliable (mt Multipliable.of_inv hf)]
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Multipliable.tprod_div (hf : Multipliable f) (hg : Multipliable g) :
∏' b, (f b / g b) = (∏' b, f b) / ∏' b, g b :=
(hf.hasProd.div hg.hasProd).tprod_eq
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-12")] alias tsum_sub := Summable.tsum_sub
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2025-04-12")] alias tprod_div :=
Multipliable.tprod_div
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Multipliable.prod_mul_tprod_compl {s : Finset β} (hf : Multipliable f) :
(∏ x ∈ s, f x) * ∏' x : ↑(s : Set β)ᶜ, f x = ∏' x, f x :=
((s.hasProd f).mul_compl (s.multipliable_compl_iff.2 hf).hasProd).tprod_eq.symm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-12")] alias sum_add_tsum_compl := Summable.sum_add_tsum_compl
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2025-04-12")] alias prod_mul_tprod_compl :=
Multipliable.prod_mul_tprod_compl
/-- Let `f : β → α` be a multipliable function and let `b ∈ β` be an index.
Lemma `tprod_eq_mul_tprod_ite` writes `∏ n, f n` as `f b` times the product of the
remaining terms. -/
@[to_additive "Let `f : β → α` be a summable function and let `b ∈ β` be an index.
Lemma `tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite` writes `Σ' n, f n` as `f b` plus the sum of the
remaining terms."]
protected theorem Multipliable.tprod_eq_mul_tprod_ite [DecidableEq β] (hf : Multipliable f)
(b : β) : ∏' n, f n = f b * ∏' n, ite (n = b) 1 (f n) := by
rw [(hasProd_ite_div_hasProd hf.hasProd b).tprod_eq]
exact (mul_div_cancel _ _).symm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-12")] alias tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite := Summable.tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite
@[to_additive existing, deprecated (since := "2025-04-12")] alias tprod_eq_mul_tprod_ite :=
Multipliable.tprod_eq_mul_tprod_ite
end tprod
end IsTopologicalGroup
section IsUniformGroup
variable [CommGroup α] [UniformSpace α]
/-- The **Cauchy criterion** for infinite products, also known as the **Cauchy convergence test** -/
@[to_additive "The **Cauchy criterion** for infinite sums, also known as the
**Cauchy convergence test**"]
theorem multipliable_iff_cauchySeq_finset [CompleteSpace α] {f : β → α} :
Multipliable f ↔ CauchySeq fun s : Finset β ↦ ∏ b ∈ s, f b := by
classical exact cauchy_map_iff_exists_tendsto.symm
variable [IsUniformGroup α] {f g : β → α}
@[to_additive]
theorem cauchySeq_finset_iff_prod_vanishing :
(CauchySeq fun s : Finset β ↦ ∏ b ∈ s, f b) ↔
∀ e ∈ 𝓝 (1 : α), ∃ s : Finset β, ∀ t, Disjoint t s → (∏ b ∈ t, f b) ∈ e := by
classical
simp only [CauchySeq, cauchy_map_iff, and_iff_right atTop_neBot, prod_atTop_atTop_eq,
uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_one α, tendsto_comap_iff, Function.comp_def, atTop_neBot, true_and]
rw [tendsto_atTop']
constructor
· intro h e he
obtain ⟨⟨s₁, s₂⟩, h⟩ := h e he
use s₁ ∪ s₂
intro t ht
specialize h (s₁ ∪ s₂, s₁ ∪ s₂ ∪ t) ⟨le_sup_left, le_sup_of_le_left le_sup_right⟩
simpa only [Finset.prod_union ht.symm, mul_div_cancel_left] using h
· rintro h e he
rcases exists_nhds_split_inv he with ⟨d, hd, hde⟩
rcases h d hd with ⟨s, h⟩
use (s, s)
rintro ⟨t₁, t₂⟩ ⟨ht₁, ht₂⟩
have : ((∏ b ∈ t₂, f b) / ∏ b ∈ t₁, f b) = (∏ b ∈ t₂ \ s, f b) / ∏ b ∈ t₁ \ s, f b := by
rw [← Finset.prod_sdiff ht₁, ← Finset.prod_sdiff ht₂, mul_div_mul_right_eq_div]
simp only [this]
exact hde _ (h _ Finset.sdiff_disjoint) _ (h _ Finset.sdiff_disjoint)
@[to_additive]
theorem cauchySeq_finset_iff_tprod_vanishing :
(CauchySeq fun s : Finset β ↦ ∏ b ∈ s, f b) ↔
∀ e ∈ 𝓝 (1 : α), ∃ s : Finset β, ∀ t : Set β, Disjoint t s → (∏' b : t, f b) ∈ e := by
simp_rw [cauchySeq_finset_iff_prod_vanishing, Set.disjoint_left, disjoint_left]
refine ⟨fun vanish e he ↦ ?_, fun vanish e he ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨o, ho, o_closed, oe⟩ := exists_mem_nhds_isClosed_subset he
obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := vanish o ho
refine ⟨s, fun t hts ↦ oe ?_⟩
by_cases ht : Multipliable fun a : t ↦ f a
· classical
refine o_closed.mem_of_tendsto ht.hasProd (Eventually.of_forall fun t' ↦ ?_)
rw [← prod_subtype_map_embedding fun _ _ ↦ by rfl]
apply hs
simp_rw [Finset.mem_map]
rintro _ ⟨b, -, rfl⟩
exact hts b.prop
· exact tprod_eq_one_of_not_multipliable ht ▸ mem_of_mem_nhds ho
· obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := vanish _ he
exact ⟨s, fun t hts ↦ (t.tprod_subtype f).symm ▸ hs _ hts⟩
variable [CompleteSpace α]
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_iff_vanishing :
Multipliable f ↔
∀ e ∈ 𝓝 (1 : α), ∃ s : Finset β, ∀ t, Disjoint t s → (∏ b ∈ t, f b) ∈ e := by
rw [multipliable_iff_cauchySeq_finset, cauchySeq_finset_iff_prod_vanishing]
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_iff_tprod_vanishing : Multipliable f ↔
∀ e ∈ 𝓝 (1 : α), ∃ s : Finset β, ∀ t : Set β, Disjoint t s → (∏' b : t, f b) ∈ e := by
rw [multipliable_iff_cauchySeq_finset, cauchySeq_finset_iff_tprod_vanishing]
-- TODO: generalize to monoid with a uniform continuous subtraction operator: `(a + b) - b = a`
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.multipliable_of_eq_one_or_self (hf : Multipliable f)
(h : ∀ b, g b = 1 ∨ g b = f b) : Multipliable g := by
classical
exact multipliable_iff_vanishing.2 fun e he ↦
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := multipliable_iff_vanishing.1 hf e he
⟨s, fun t ht ↦
| have eq : ∏ b ∈ t with g b = f b, f b = ∏ b ∈ t, g b :=
calc
∏ b ∈ t with g b = f b, f b = ∏ b ∈ t with g b = f b, g b :=
Finset.prod_congr rfl fun b hb ↦ (Finset.mem_filter.1 hb).2.symm
_ = ∏ b ∈ t, g b := by
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/InfiniteSum/Group.lean | 287 | 291 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.LinearMapPiProd
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Multilinear.Basic
/-!
# Continuous multilinear maps
We define continuous multilinear maps as maps from `(i : ι) → M₁ i` to `M₂` which are multilinear
and continuous, by extending the space of multilinear maps with a continuity assumption.
Here, `M₁ i` and `M₂` are modules over a ring `R`, and `ι` is an arbitrary type, and all these
spaces are also topological spaces.
## Main definitions
* `ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂` is the space of continuous multilinear maps from
`(i : ι) → M₁ i` to `M₂`. We show that it is an `R`-module.
## Implementation notes
We mostly follow the API of multilinear maps.
## Notation
We introduce the notation `M [×n]→L[R] M'` for the space of continuous `n`-multilinear maps from
`M^n` to `M'`. This is a particular case of the general notion (where we allow varying dependent
types as the arguments of our continuous multilinear maps), but arguably the most important one,
especially when defining iterated derivatives.
-/
open Function Fin Set
universe u v w w₁ w₁' w₂ w₃ w₄
variable {R : Type u} {ι : Type v} {n : ℕ} {M : Fin n.succ → Type w} {M₁ : ι → Type w₁}
{M₁' : ι → Type w₁'} {M₂ : Type w₂} {M₃ : Type w₃} {M₄ : Type w₄}
/-- Continuous multilinear maps over the ring `R`, from `∀ i, M₁ i` to `M₂` where `M₁ i` and `M₂`
are modules over `R` with a topological structure. In applications, there will be compatibility
conditions between the algebraic and the topological structures, but this is not needed for the
definition. -/
structure ContinuousMultilinearMap (R : Type u) {ι : Type v} (M₁ : ι → Type w₁) (M₂ : Type w₂)
[Semiring R] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [∀ i, Module R (M₁ i)] [Module R M₂]
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (M₁ i)] [TopologicalSpace M₂] extends MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ where
cont : Continuous toFun
attribute [inherit_doc ContinuousMultilinearMap] ContinuousMultilinearMap.cont
@[inherit_doc]
notation:25 M " [×" n "]→L[" R "] " M' => ContinuousMultilinearMap R (fun i : Fin n => M) M'
namespace ContinuousMultilinearMap
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M i)] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁ i)]
[∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M₁' i)] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃] [AddCommMonoid M₄]
[∀ i, Module R (M i)] [∀ i, Module R (M₁ i)] [∀ i, Module R (M₁' i)] [Module R M₂] [Module R M₃]
[Module R M₄] [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (M i)] [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (M₁ i)]
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (M₁' i)] [TopologicalSpace M₂] [TopologicalSpace M₃] [TopologicalSpace M₄]
(f f' : ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
theorem toMultilinearMap_injective :
Function.Injective
(ContinuousMultilinearMap.toMultilinearMap :
| ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂ → MultilinearMap R M₁ M₂)
| ⟨f, hf⟩, ⟨g, hg⟩, h => by subst h; rfl
instance funLike : FunLike (ContinuousMultilinearMap R M₁ M₂) (∀ i, M₁ i) M₂ where
coe f := f.toFun
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/Module/Multilinear/Basic.lean | 70 | 74 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Algebra
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Convex
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.LinearMap.Rat
import Mathlib.Tactic.Module
/-!
# Inner product space derived from a norm
This file defines an `InnerProductSpace` instance from a norm that respects the
parallellogram identity. The parallelogram identity is a way to express the inner product of `x` and
`y` in terms of the norms of `x`, `y`, `x + y`, `x - y`.
## Main results
- `InnerProductSpace.ofNorm`: a normed space whose norm respects the parallellogram identity,
can be seen as an inner product space.
## Implementation notes
We define `inner_`
$$\langle x, y \rangle := \frac{1}{4} (‖x + y‖^2 - ‖x - y‖^2 + i ‖ix + y‖ ^ 2 - i ‖ix - y‖^2)$$
and use the parallelogram identity
$$‖x + y‖^2 + ‖x - y‖^2 = 2 (‖x‖^2 + ‖y‖^2)$$
to prove it is an inner product, i.e., that it is conjugate-symmetric (`inner_.conj_symm`) and
linear in the first argument. `add_left` is proved by judicious application of the parallelogram
identity followed by tedious arithmetic. `smul_left` is proved step by step, first noting that
$\langle λ x, y \rangle = λ \langle x, y \rangle$ for $λ ∈ ℕ$, $λ = -1$, hence $λ ∈ ℤ$ and $λ ∈ ℚ$
by arithmetic. Then by continuity and the fact that ℚ is dense in ℝ, the same is true for ℝ.
The case of ℂ then follows by applying the result for ℝ and more arithmetic.
## TODO
Move upstream to `Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Basic`.
## References
- [Jordan, P. and von Neumann, J., *On inner products in linear, metric spaces*][Jordan1935]
- https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/21792/norms-induced-by-inner-products-and-the-parallelogram-law
- https://math.dartmouth.edu/archive/m113w10/public_html/jordan-vneumann-thm.pdf
## Tags
inner product space, Hilbert space, norm
-/
open RCLike
open scoped ComplexConjugate
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] (E : Type*) [NormedAddCommGroup E]
/-- Predicate for the parallelogram identity to hold in a normed group. This is a scalar-less
version of `InnerProductSpace`. If you have an `InnerProductSpaceable` assumption, you can
locally upgrade that to `InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E` using `casesI nonempty_innerProductSpace 𝕜 E`.
-/
class InnerProductSpaceable : Prop where
parallelogram_identity :
∀ x y : E, ‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ + ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = 2 * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖)
variable (𝕜) {E}
theorem InnerProductSpace.toInnerProductSpaceable [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] :
InnerProductSpaceable E :=
⟨parallelogram_law_with_norm 𝕜⟩
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) InnerProductSpace.toInnerProductSpaceable_ofReal
[InnerProductSpace ℝ E] : InnerProductSpaceable E :=
⟨parallelogram_law_with_norm ℝ⟩
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
local notation "𝓚" => algebraMap ℝ 𝕜
/-- Auxiliary definition of the inner product derived from the norm. -/
private noncomputable def inner_ (x y : E) : 𝕜 :=
4⁻¹ * (𝓚 ‖x + y‖ * 𝓚 ‖x + y‖ - 𝓚 ‖x - y‖ * 𝓚 ‖x - y‖ +
(I : 𝕜) * 𝓚 ‖(I : 𝕜) • x + y‖ * 𝓚 ‖(I : 𝕜) • x + y‖ -
(I : 𝕜) * 𝓚 ‖(I : 𝕜) • x - y‖ * 𝓚 ‖(I : 𝕜) • x - y‖)
namespace InnerProductSpaceable
variable {𝕜} (E)
-- This has a prime added to avoid clashing with public `innerProp`
/-- Auxiliary definition for the `add_left` property. -/
private def innerProp' (r : 𝕜) : Prop :=
∀ x y : E, inner_ 𝕜 (r • x) y = conj r * inner_ 𝕜 x y
variable {E}
theorem _root_.Continuous.inner_ {f g : ℝ → E} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) :
Continuous fun x => inner_ 𝕜 (f x) (g x) := by
unfold _root_.inner_
fun_prop
theorem inner_.norm_sq (x : E) : ‖x‖ ^ 2 = re (inner_ 𝕜 x x) := by
simp only [inner_, normSq_apply, ofNat_re, ofNat_im, map_sub, map_add, map_zero, map_mul,
ofReal_re, ofReal_im, mul_re, inv_re, mul_im, I_re, inv_im]
have h₁ : ‖x - x‖ = 0 := by simp
have h₂ : ‖x + x‖ = 2 • ‖x‖ := by convert norm_nsmul 𝕜 2 x using 2; module
rw [h₁, h₂]
ring
theorem inner_.conj_symm (x y : E) : conj (inner_ 𝕜 y x) = inner_ 𝕜 x y := by
simp only [inner_, map_sub, map_add, map_mul, map_inv₀, map_ofNat, conj_ofReal, conj_I]
rw [add_comm y x, norm_sub_rev]
by_cases hI : (I : 𝕜) = 0
· simp only [hI, neg_zero, zero_mul]
have hI' := I_mul_I_of_nonzero hI
have I_smul (v : E) : ‖(I : 𝕜) • v‖ = ‖v‖ := by rw [norm_smul, norm_I_of_ne_zero hI, one_mul]
have h₁ : ‖(I : 𝕜) • y - x‖ = ‖(I : 𝕜) • x + y‖ := by
convert I_smul ((I : 𝕜) • x + y) using 2
linear_combination (norm := module) -hI' • x
have h₂ : ‖(I : 𝕜) • y + x‖ = ‖(I : 𝕜) • x - y‖ := by
convert (I_smul ((I : 𝕜) • y + x)).symm using 2
linear_combination (norm := module) -hI' • y
rw [h₁, h₂]
ring
variable [InnerProductSpaceable E]
private theorem add_left_aux1 (x y z : E) :
‖2 • x + y‖ * ‖2 • x + y‖ + ‖2 • z + y‖ * ‖2 • z + y‖
= 2 * (‖x + y + z‖ * ‖x + y + z‖ + ‖x - z‖ * ‖x - z‖) := by
convert parallelogram_identity (x + y + z) (x - z) using 4 <;> abel
private theorem add_left_aux2 (x y z : E) : ‖2 • x + y‖ * ‖2 • x + y‖ + ‖y - 2 • z‖ * ‖y - 2 • z‖
= 2 * (‖x + y - z‖ * ‖x + y - z‖ + ‖x + z‖ * ‖x + z‖) := by
convert parallelogram_identity (x + y - z) (x + z) using 4 <;> abel
private theorem add_left_aux3 (y z : E) :
‖2 • z + y‖ * ‖2 • z + y‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ = 2 * (‖y + z‖ * ‖y + z‖ + ‖z‖ * ‖z‖) := by
convert parallelogram_identity (y + z) z using 4 <;> abel
private theorem add_left_aux4 (y z : E) :
‖y‖ * ‖y‖ + ‖y - 2 • z‖ * ‖y - 2 • z‖ = 2 * (‖y - z‖ * ‖y - z‖ + ‖z‖ * ‖z‖) := by
convert parallelogram_identity (y - z) z using 4 <;> abel
variable (𝕜)
private theorem add_left_aux5 (x y z : E) :
‖(I : 𝕜) • (2 • x + y)‖ * ‖(I : 𝕜) • (2 • x + y)‖
+ ‖(I : 𝕜) • y + 2 • z‖ * ‖(I : 𝕜) • y + 2 • z‖
= 2 * (‖(I : 𝕜) • (x + y) + z‖ * ‖(I : 𝕜) • (x + y) + z‖
+ ‖(I : 𝕜) • x - z‖ * ‖(I : 𝕜) • x - z‖) := by
convert parallelogram_identity ((I : 𝕜) • (x + y) + z) ((I : 𝕜) • x - z) using 4 <;> module
private theorem add_left_aux6 (x y z : E) :
(‖(I : 𝕜) • (2 • x + y)‖ * ‖(I : 𝕜) • (2 • x + y)‖ +
‖(I : 𝕜) • y - 2 • z‖ * ‖(I : 𝕜) • y - 2 • z‖)
= 2 * (‖(I : 𝕜) • (x + y) - z‖ * ‖(I : 𝕜) • (x + y) - z‖ +
‖(I : 𝕜) • x + z‖ * ‖(I : 𝕜) • x + z‖) := by
convert parallelogram_identity ((I : 𝕜) • (x + y) - z) ((I : 𝕜) • x + z) using 4 <;> module
private theorem add_left_aux7 (y z : E) :
‖(I : 𝕜) • y + 2 • z‖ * ‖(I : 𝕜) • y + 2 • z‖ + ‖(I : 𝕜) • y‖ * ‖(I : 𝕜) • y‖ =
2 * (‖(I : 𝕜) • y + z‖ * ‖(I : 𝕜) • y + z‖ + ‖z‖ * ‖z‖) := by
convert parallelogram_identity ((I : 𝕜) • y + z) z using 4 <;> module
private theorem add_left_aux8 (y z : E) :
‖(I : 𝕜) • y‖ * ‖(I : 𝕜) • y‖ + ‖(I : 𝕜) • y - 2 • z‖ * ‖(I : 𝕜) • y - 2 • z‖ =
2 * (‖(I : 𝕜) • y - z‖ * ‖(I : 𝕜) • y - z‖ + ‖z‖ * ‖z‖) := by
convert parallelogram_identity ((I : 𝕜) • y - z) z using 4 <;> module
variable {𝕜}
theorem add_left (x y z : E) : inner_ 𝕜 (x + y) z = inner_ 𝕜 x z + inner_ 𝕜 y z := by
have H_re := congr(- $(add_left_aux1 x y z) + $(add_left_aux2 x y z)
+ $(add_left_aux3 y z) - $(add_left_aux4 y z))
have H_im := congr(- $(add_left_aux5 𝕜 x y z) + $(add_left_aux6 𝕜 x y z)
+ $(add_left_aux7 𝕜 y z) - $(add_left_aux8 𝕜 y z))
have H := congr(𝓚 $H_re + I * 𝓚 $H_im)
simp only [inner_, map_add, map_sub, map_neg, map_mul, map_ofNat] at H ⊢
linear_combination H / 8
private theorem rat_prop (r : ℚ) : innerProp' E (r : 𝕜) := by
intro x y
let hom : 𝕜 →ₗ[ℚ] 𝕜 := AddMonoidHom.toRatLinearMap <|
AddMonoidHom.mk' (fun r ↦ inner_ 𝕜 (r • x) y) <| fun a b ↦ by
simpa [add_smul] using add_left (a • x) (b • x) y
simpa [hom, Rat.smul_def] using map_smul hom r 1
private theorem real_prop (r : ℝ) : innerProp' E (r : 𝕜) := by
intro x y
revert r
rw [← funext_iff]
refine Rat.isDenseEmbedding_coe_real.dense.equalizer ?_ ?_ (funext fun X => ?_)
· exact (continuous_ofReal.smul continuous_const).inner_ continuous_const
· exact (continuous_conj.comp continuous_ofReal).mul continuous_const
· simp only [Function.comp_apply, RCLike.ofReal_ratCast, rat_prop _ _]
private theorem I_prop : innerProp' E (I : 𝕜) := by
by_cases hI : (I : 𝕜) = 0
· rw [hI]
simpa using real_prop (𝕜 := 𝕜) 0
intro x y
have hI' := I_mul_I_of_nonzero hI
rw [conj_I, inner_, inner_, mul_left_comm, smul_smul, hI', neg_one_smul]
have h₁ : ‖-x - y‖ = ‖x + y‖ := by rw [← neg_add', norm_neg]
have h₂ : ‖-x + y‖ = ‖x - y‖ := by rw [← neg_sub, norm_neg, sub_eq_neg_add]
rw [h₁, h₂]
linear_combination (- 𝓚 ‖(I : 𝕜) • x - y‖ ^ 2 + 𝓚 ‖(I : 𝕜) • x + y‖ ^ 2) * hI' / 4
theorem innerProp (r : 𝕜) : innerProp' E r := by
intro x y
rw [← re_add_im r, add_smul, add_left, real_prop _ x, ← smul_smul, real_prop _ _ y, I_prop,
map_add, map_mul, conj_ofReal, conj_ofReal, conj_I]
ring
end InnerProductSpaceable
open InnerProductSpaceable
/-- **Fréchet–von Neumann–Jordan Theorem**. A normed space `E` whose norm satisfies the
parallelogram identity can be given a compatible inner product. -/
noncomputable def InnerProductSpace.ofNorm
(h : ∀ x y : E, ‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ + ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = 2 * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖)) :
InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E :=
haveI : InnerProductSpaceable E := ⟨h⟩
{ inner := inner_ 𝕜
norm_sq_eq_re_inner := inner_.norm_sq
conj_inner_symm := inner_.conj_symm
add_left := InnerProductSpaceable.add_left
smul_left := fun _ _ _ => innerProp _ _ _ }
variable (E)
variable [InnerProductSpaceable E]
/-- **Fréchet–von Neumann–Jordan Theorem**. A normed space `E` whose norm satisfies the
parallelogram identity can be given a compatible inner product. Do
`casesI nonempty_innerProductSpace 𝕜 E` to locally upgrade `InnerProductSpaceable E` to
`InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E`. -/
theorem nonempty_innerProductSpace : Nonempty (InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E) :=
⟨{ inner := inner_ 𝕜
norm_sq_eq_re_inner := inner_.norm_sq
conj_inner_symm := inner_.conj_symm
add_left := add_left
smul_left := fun _ _ _ => innerProp _ _ _ }⟩
| variable {𝕜 E}
variable [NormedSpace ℝ E]
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/OfNorm.lean | 251 | 252 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kenny Lau, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
/-!
# Eckmann-Hilton argument
The Eckmann-Hilton argument says that if a type carries two monoid structures that distribute
over one another, then they are equal, and in addition commutative.
The main application lies in proving that higher homotopy groups (`πₙ` for `n ≥ 2`) are commutative.
## Main declarations
* `EckmannHilton.commMonoid`: If a type carries a unital magma structure that distributes
over a unital binary operation, then the magma is a commutative monoid.
* `EckmannHilton.commGroup`: If a type carries a group structure that distributes
over a unital binary operation, then the group is commutative.
-/
universe u
namespace EckmannHilton
variable {X : Type u}
/-- Local notation for `m a b`. -/
local notation a " <" m:51 "> " b => m a b
/-- `IsUnital m e` expresses that `e : X` is a left and right unit
for the binary operation `m : X → X → X`. -/
structure IsUnital (m : X → X → X) (e : X) : Prop extends Std.LawfulIdentity m e
@[to_additive EckmannHilton.AddZeroClass.IsUnital]
theorem MulOneClass.isUnital [_G : MulOneClass X] : IsUnital (· * ·) (1 : X) :=
IsUnital.mk { left_id := MulOneClass.one_mul,
right_id := MulOneClass.mul_one }
variable {m₁ m₂ : X → X → X} {e₁ e₂ : X}
variable (h₁ : IsUnital m₁ e₁) (h₂ : IsUnital m₂ e₂)
variable (distrib : ∀ a b c d, ((a <m₂> b) <m₁> c <m₂> d) = (a <m₁> c) <m₂> b <m₁> d)
include h₁ h₂ distrib
/-- If a type carries two unital binary operations that distribute over each other,
then they have the same unit elements.
In fact, the two operations are the same, and give a commutative monoid structure,
see `eckmann_hilton.CommMonoid`. -/
theorem one : e₁ = e₂ := by
simpa only [h₁.left_id, h₁.right_id, h₂.left_id, h₂.right_id] using distrib e₂ e₁ e₁ e₂
| /-- If a type carries two unital binary operations that distribute over each other,
then these operations are equal.
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/EckmannHilton.lean | 56 | 57 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jon Eugster. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jon Eugster
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.LocalRing
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
/-!
# Equal and mixed characteristic
In commutative algebra, some statements are simpler when working over a `ℚ`-algebra `R`, in which
case one also says that the ring has "equal characteristic zero". A ring that is not a
`ℚ`-algebra has either positive characteristic or there exists a prime ideal `I ⊂ R` such that
the quotient `R ⧸ I` has positive characteristic `p > 0`. In this case one speaks of
"mixed characteristic `(0, p)`", where `p` is only unique if `R` is local.
Examples of mixed characteristic rings are `ℤ` or the `p`-adic integers/numbers.
This file provides the main theorem `split_by_characteristic` that splits any proposition `P` into
the following three cases:
1) Positive characteristic: `CharP R p` (where `p ≠ 0`)
2) Equal characteristic zero: `Algebra ℚ R`
3) Mixed characteristic: `MixedCharZero R p` (where `p` is prime)
## Main definitions
- `MixedCharZero` : A ring has mixed characteristic `(0, p)` if it has characteristic zero
and there exists an ideal such that the quotient `R ⧸ I` has characteristic `p`.
## Main results
- `split_equalCharZero_mixedCharZero` : Split a statement into equal/mixed characteristic zero.
This main theorem has the following three corollaries which include the positive
characteristic case for convenience:
- `split_by_characteristic` : Generally consider positive char `p ≠ 0`.
- `split_by_characteristic_domain` : In a domain we can assume that `p` is prime.
- `split_by_characteristic_localRing` : In a local ring we can assume that `p` is a prime power.
## Implementation Notes
We use the terms `EqualCharZero` and `AlgebraRat` despite not being such definitions in mathlib.
The former refers to the statement `∀ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ → CharZero (R ⧸ I)`, the latter
refers to the existence of an instance `[Algebra ℚ R]`. The two are shown to be
equivalent conditions.
## TODO
- Relate mixed characteristic in a local ring to p-adic numbers [NumberTheory.PAdics].
-/
variable (R : Type*) [CommRing R]
/-!
### Mixed characteristic
-/
/--
A ring of characteristic zero is of "mixed characteristic `(0, p)`" if there exists an ideal
such that the quotient `R ⧸ I` has characteristic `p`.
**Remark:** For `p = 0`, `MixedChar R 0` is a meaningless definition (i.e. satisfied by any ring)
as `R ⧸ ⊥ ≅ R` has by definition always characteristic zero.
One could require `(I ≠ ⊥)` in the definition, but then `MixedChar R 0` would mean something
like `ℤ`-algebra of extension degree `≥ 1` and would be completely independent from
whether something is a `ℚ`-algebra or not (e.g. `ℚ[X]` would satisfy it but `ℚ` wouldn't).
-/
class MixedCharZero (p : ℕ) : Prop where
[toCharZero : CharZero R]
charP_quotient : ∃ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ ∧ CharP (R ⧸ I) p
namespace MixedCharZero
/--
Reduction to `p` prime: When proving any statement `P` about mixed characteristic rings we
can always assume that `p` is prime.
-/
theorem reduce_to_p_prime {P : Prop} :
(∀ p > 0, MixedCharZero R p → P) ↔ ∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → MixedCharZero R p → P := by
constructor
· intro h q q_prime q_mixedChar
exact h q (Nat.Prime.pos q_prime) q_mixedChar
· intro h q q_pos q_mixedChar
rcases q_mixedChar.charP_quotient with ⟨I, hI_ne_top, _⟩
-- Krull's Thm: There exists a prime ideal `P` such that `I ≤ P`
rcases Ideal.exists_le_maximal I hI_ne_top with ⟨M, hM_max, h_IM⟩
let r := ringChar (R ⧸ M)
have r_pos : r ≠ 0 := by
have q_zero :=
congr_arg (Ideal.Quotient.factor h_IM) (CharP.cast_eq_zero (R ⧸ I) q)
simp only [map_natCast, map_zero] at q_zero
apply ne_zero_of_dvd_ne_zero (ne_of_gt q_pos)
exact (CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff (R ⧸ M) r q).mp q_zero
have r_prime : Nat.Prime r :=
or_iff_not_imp_right.1 (CharP.char_is_prime_or_zero (R ⧸ M) r) r_pos
apply h r r_prime
have : CharZero R := q_mixedChar.toCharZero
exact ⟨⟨M, hM_max.ne_top, ringChar.of_eq rfl⟩⟩
/--
Reduction to `I` prime ideal: When proving statements about mixed characteristic rings,
after we reduced to `p` prime, we can assume that the ideal `I` in the definition is maximal.
-/
theorem reduce_to_maximal_ideal {p : ℕ} (hp : Nat.Prime p) :
(∃ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ ∧ CharP (R ⧸ I) p) ↔ ∃ I : Ideal R, I.IsMaximal ∧ CharP (R ⧸ I) p := by
constructor
· intro g
rcases g with ⟨I, ⟨hI_not_top, _⟩⟩
-- Krull's Thm: There exists a prime ideal `M` such that `I ≤ M`.
rcases Ideal.exists_le_maximal I hI_not_top with ⟨M, ⟨hM_max, hM_ge⟩⟩
use M
constructor
· exact hM_max
· cases CharP.exists (R ⧸ M) with
| intro r hr =>
convert hr
have r_dvd_p : r ∣ p := by
rw [← CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff (R ⧸ M) r p]
convert congr_arg (Ideal.Quotient.factor hM_ge) (CharP.cast_eq_zero (R ⧸ I) p)
symm
apply (Nat.Prime.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd hp r r_dvd_p).resolve_left
exact CharP.char_ne_one (R ⧸ M) r
· intro ⟨I, hI_max, h_charP⟩
use I
exact ⟨Ideal.IsMaximal.ne_top hI_max, h_charP⟩
end MixedCharZero
/-!
### Equal characteristic zero
A commutative ring `R` has "equal characteristic zero" if it satisfies one of the following
equivalent properties:
1) `R` is a `ℚ`-algebra.
2) The quotient `R ⧸ I` has characteristic zero for any proper ideal `I ⊂ R`.
3) `R` has characteristic zero and does not have mixed characteristic for any prime `p`.
We show `(1) ↔ (2) ↔ (3)`, and most of the following is concerned with constructing
an explicit algebra map `ℚ →+* R` (given by `x ↦ (x.num : R) /ₚ ↑x.pnatDen`)
for the direction `(1) ← (2)`.
Note: Property `(2)` is denoted as `EqualCharZero` in the statement names below.
-/
namespace EqualCharZero
/-- `ℚ`-algebra implies equal characteristic. -/
theorem of_algebraRat [Algebra ℚ R] : ∀ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ → CharZero (R ⧸ I) := by
intro I hI
constructor
intro a b h_ab
contrapose! hI
-- `↑a - ↑b` is a unit contained in `I`, which contradicts `I ≠ ⊤`.
refine I.eq_top_of_isUnit_mem ?_ (IsUnit.map (algebraMap ℚ R) (IsUnit.mk0 (a - b : ℚ) ?_))
· simpa only [← Ideal.Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem, map_sub, sub_eq_zero, map_natCast]
simpa only [Ne, sub_eq_zero] using (@Nat.cast_injective ℚ _ _).ne hI
section ConstructionAlgebraRat
variable {R}
/-- Internal: Not intended to be used outside this local construction. -/
theorem PNat.isUnit_natCast [h : Fact (∀ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ → CharZero (R ⧸ I))]
(n : ℕ+) : IsUnit (n : R) := by
-- `n : R` is a unit iff `(n)` is not a proper ideal in `R`.
rw [← Ideal.span_singleton_eq_top]
-- So by contrapositive, we should show the quotient does not have characteristic zero.
apply not_imp_comm.mp (h.elim (Ideal.span {↑n}))
intro h_char_zero
-- In particular, the image of `n` in the quotient should be nonzero.
apply h_char_zero.cast_injective.ne n.ne_zero
-- But `n` generates the ideal, so its image is clearly zero.
rw [← map_natCast (Ideal.Quotient.mk _), Nat.cast_zero, Ideal.Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem]
exact Ideal.subset_span (Set.mem_singleton _)
@[coe]
noncomputable def pnatCast [Fact (∀ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ → CharZero (R ⧸ I))] : ℕ+ → Rˣ :=
fun n => (PNat.isUnit_natCast n).unit
/-- Internal: Not intended to be used outside this local construction. -/
noncomputable instance coePNatUnits
[Fact (∀ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ → CharZero (R ⧸ I))] : Coe ℕ+ Rˣ :=
⟨EqualCharZero.pnatCast⟩
/-- Internal: Not intended to be used outside this local construction. -/
@[simp]
theorem pnatCast_one [Fact (∀ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ → CharZero (R ⧸ I))] : ((1 : ℕ+) : Rˣ) = 1 := by
apply Units.ext
rw [Units.val_one]
change ((PNat.isUnit_natCast (R := R) 1).unit : R) = 1
rw [IsUnit.unit_spec (PNat.isUnit_natCast 1)]
rw [PNat.one_coe, Nat.cast_one]
/-- Internal: Not intended to be used outside this local construction. -/
@[simp]
| theorem pnatCast_eq_natCast [Fact (∀ I : Ideal R, I ≠ ⊤ → CharZero (R ⧸ I))] (n : ℕ+) :
((n : Rˣ) : R) = ↑n := by
change ((PNat.isUnit_natCast (R := R) n).unit : R) = ↑n
simp only [IsUnit.unit_spec]
/-- Equal characteristic implies `ℚ`-algebra. -/
| Mathlib/Algebra/CharP/MixedCharZero.lean | 201 | 206 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.NegOnePow
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Periodic
import Mathlib.Algebra.QuadraticDiscriminant
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Exp
/-!
# Trigonometric functions
## Main definitions
This file contains the definition of `π`.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse` and
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Arctan` for the inverse trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Arg` and
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Log` for the complex argument function
and the complex logarithm.
## Main statements
Many basic inequalities on the real trigonometric functions are established.
The continuity of the usual trigonometric functions is proved.
Several facts about the real trigonometric functions have the proofs deferred to
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Complex`,
as they are most easily proved by appealing to the corresponding fact for
complex trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Chebyshev` for the multiple angle formulas
in terms of Chebyshev polynomials.
## Tags
sin, cos, tan, angle
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology Filter Set
namespace Complex
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp (-z * I) - exp (z * I)) * I / 2
fun_prop
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_sin {s : Set ℂ} : ContinuousOn sin s :=
continuous_sin.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp (z * I) + exp (-z * I)) / 2
fun_prop
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_cos {s : Set ℂ} : ContinuousOn cos s :=
continuous_cos.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sinh : Continuous sinh := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp z - exp (-z)) / 2
fun_prop
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cosh : Continuous cosh := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp z + exp (-z)) / 2
fun_prop
end Complex
namespace Real
variable {x y z : ℝ}
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_sin.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_sin {s} : ContinuousOn sin s :=
continuous_sin.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_cos.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_cos {s} : ContinuousOn cos s :=
continuous_cos.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sinh : Continuous sinh :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_sinh.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cosh : Continuous cosh :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_cosh.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
end Real
namespace Real
theorem exists_cos_eq_zero : 0 ∈ cos '' Icc (1 : ℝ) 2 :=
intermediate_value_Icc' (by norm_num) continuousOn_cos
⟨le_of_lt cos_two_neg, le_of_lt cos_one_pos⟩
/-- The number π = 3.14159265... Defined here using choice as twice a zero of cos in [1,2], from
which one can derive all its properties. For explicit bounds on π, see `Data.Real.Pi.Bounds`.
Denoted `π`, once the `Real` namespace is opened. -/
protected noncomputable def pi : ℝ :=
2 * Classical.choose exists_cos_eq_zero
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "π" => Real.pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_two : cos (π / 2) = 0 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).2
theorem one_le_pi_div_two : (1 : ℝ) ≤ π / 2 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).1.1
theorem pi_div_two_le_two : π / 2 ≤ 2 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).1.2
theorem two_le_pi : (2 : ℝ) ≤ π :=
(div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right (show (0 : ℝ) < 2 by norm_num)).1
(by rw [div_self (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]; exact one_le_pi_div_two)
theorem pi_le_four : π ≤ 4 :=
(div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right (show (0 : ℝ) < 2 by norm_num)).1
(calc
π / 2 ≤ 2 := pi_div_two_le_two
_ = 4 / 2 := by norm_num)
@[bound]
theorem pi_pos : 0 < π :=
| lt_of_lt_of_le (by norm_num) two_le_pi
@[bound]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Basic.lean | 152 | 154 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomotopyCategory.HomComplex
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomotopyCofiber
/-! # The mapping cone of a morphism of cochain complexes
In this file, we study the homotopy cofiber `HomologicalComplex.homotopyCofiber`
of a morphism `φ : F ⟶ G` of cochain complexes indexed by `ℤ`. In this case,
we redefine it as `CochainComplex.mappingCone φ`. The API involves definitions
- `mappingCone.inl φ : Cochain F (mappingCone φ) (-1)`,
- `mappingCone.inr φ : G ⟶ mappingCone φ`,
- `mappingCone.fst φ : Cocycle (mappingCone φ) F 1` and
- `mappingCone.snd φ : Cochain (mappingCone φ) G 0`.
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
open CategoryTheory Limits
variable {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D] [Preadditive C] [Preadditive D]
namespace CochainComplex
open HomologicalComplex
section
variable {ι : Type*} [AddRightCancelSemigroup ι] [One ι]
{F G : CochainComplex C ι} (φ : F ⟶ G)
instance [∀ p, HasBinaryBiproduct (F.X (p + 1)) (G.X p)] :
HasHomotopyCofiber φ where
hasBinaryBiproduct := by
rintro i _ rfl
infer_instance
end
variable {F G : CochainComplex C ℤ} (φ : F ⟶ G)
variable [HasHomotopyCofiber φ]
/-- The mapping cone of a morphism of cochain complexes indexed by `ℤ`. -/
noncomputable def mappingCone := homotopyCofiber φ
namespace mappingCone
open HomComplex
/-- The left inclusion in the mapping cone, as a cochain of degree `-1`. -/
noncomputable def inl : Cochain F (mappingCone φ) (-1) :=
Cochain.mk (fun p q hpq => homotopyCofiber.inlX φ p q (by dsimp; omega))
/-- The right inclusion in the mapping cone. -/
noncomputable def inr : G ⟶ mappingCone φ := homotopyCofiber.inr φ
/-- The first projection from the mapping cone, as a cocyle of degree `1`. -/
noncomputable def fst : Cocycle (mappingCone φ) F 1 :=
Cocycle.mk (Cochain.mk (fun p q hpq => homotopyCofiber.fstX φ p q hpq)) 2 (by omega) (by
ext p _ rfl
simp [δ_v 1 2 (by omega) _ p (p + 2) (by omega) (p + 1) (p + 1) (by omega) rfl,
homotopyCofiber.d_fstX φ p (p + 1) (p + 2) rfl, mappingCone,
show Int.negOnePow 2 = 1 by rfl])
/-- The second projection from the mapping cone, as a cochain of degree `0`. -/
noncomputable def snd : Cochain (mappingCone φ) G 0 :=
Cochain.ofHoms (homotopyCofiber.sndX φ)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inl_v_fst_v (p q : ℤ) (hpq : q + 1 = p) :
(inl φ).v p q (by rw [← hpq, add_neg_cancel_right]) ≫
(fst φ : Cochain (mappingCone φ) F 1).v q p hpq = 𝟙 _ := by
simp [inl, fst]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inl_v_snd_v (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + (-1) = q) :
(inl φ).v p q hpq ≫ (snd φ).v q q (add_zero q) = 0 := by
simp [inl, snd]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inr_f_fst_v (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + 1 = q) :
(inr φ).f p ≫ (fst φ).1.v p q hpq = 0 := by
simp [inr, fst]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inr_f_snd_v (p : ℤ) :
(inr φ).f p ≫ (snd φ).v p p (add_zero p) = 𝟙 _ := by
simp [inr, snd]
@[simp]
lemma inl_fst :
(inl φ).comp (fst φ).1 (neg_add_cancel 1) = Cochain.ofHom (𝟙 F) := by
ext p
simp [Cochain.comp_v _ _ (neg_add_cancel 1) p (p-1) p rfl (by omega)]
@[simp]
lemma inl_snd :
(inl φ).comp (snd φ) (add_zero (-1)) = 0 := by
ext p q hpq
simp [Cochain.comp_v _ _ (add_zero (-1)) p q q (by omega) (by omega)]
@[simp]
lemma inr_fst :
(Cochain.ofHom (inr φ)).comp (fst φ).1 (zero_add 1) = 0 := by
ext p q hpq
simp [Cochain.comp_v _ _ (zero_add 1) p p q (by omega) (by omega)]
@[simp]
lemma inr_snd :
(Cochain.ofHom (inr φ)).comp (snd φ) (zero_add 0) = Cochain.ofHom (𝟙 G) := by aesop_cat
/-! In order to obtain identities of cochains involving `inl`, `inr`, `fst` and `snd`,
it is often convenient to use an `ext` lemma, and use simp lemmas like `inl_v_f_fst_v`,
but it is sometimes possible to get identities of cochains by using rewrites of
identities of cochains like `inl_fst`. Then, similarly as in category theory,
if we associate the compositions of cochains to the right as much as possible,
it is also interesting to have `reassoc` variants of lemmas, like `inl_fst_assoc`. -/
@[simp]
lemma inl_fst_assoc {K : CochainComplex C ℤ} {d e : ℤ} (γ : Cochain F K d) (he : 1 + d = e) :
(inl φ).comp ((fst φ).1.comp γ he) (by rw [← he, neg_add_cancel_left]) = γ := by
rw [← Cochain.comp_assoc _ _ _ (neg_add_cancel 1) (by omega) (by omega), inl_fst,
Cochain.id_comp]
@[simp]
lemma inl_snd_assoc {K : CochainComplex C ℤ} {d e f : ℤ} (γ : Cochain G K d)
(he : 0 + d = e) (hf : -1 + e = f) :
(inl φ).comp ((snd φ).comp γ he) hf = 0 := by
obtain rfl : e = d := by omega
rw [← Cochain.comp_assoc_of_second_is_zero_cochain, inl_snd, Cochain.zero_comp]
@[simp]
lemma inr_fst_assoc {K : CochainComplex C ℤ} {d e f : ℤ} (γ : Cochain F K d)
(he : 1 + d = e) (hf : 0 + e = f) :
(Cochain.ofHom (inr φ)).comp ((fst φ).1.comp γ he) hf = 0 := by
obtain rfl : e = f := by omega
rw [← Cochain.comp_assoc_of_first_is_zero_cochain, inr_fst, Cochain.zero_comp]
@[simp]
lemma inr_snd_assoc {K : CochainComplex C ℤ} {d e : ℤ} (γ : Cochain G K d) (he : 0 + d = e) :
(Cochain.ofHom (inr φ)).comp ((snd φ).comp γ he) (by simp only [← he, zero_add]) = γ := by
obtain rfl : d = e := by omega
rw [← Cochain.comp_assoc_of_first_is_zero_cochain, inr_snd, Cochain.id_comp]
lemma ext_to (i j : ℤ) (hij : i + 1 = j) {A : C} {f g : A ⟶ (mappingCone φ).X i}
(h₁ : f ≫ (fst φ).1.v i j hij = g ≫ (fst φ).1.v i j hij)
(h₂ : f ≫ (snd φ).v i i (add_zero i) = g ≫ (snd φ).v i i (add_zero i)) :
f = g :=
homotopyCofiber.ext_to_X φ i j hij h₁ (by simpa [snd] using h₂)
lemma ext_to_iff (i j : ℤ) (hij : i + 1 = j) {A : C} (f g : A ⟶ (mappingCone φ).X i) :
f = g ↔ f ≫ (fst φ).1.v i j hij = g ≫ (fst φ).1.v i j hij ∧
f ≫ (snd φ).v i i (add_zero i) = g ≫ (snd φ).v i i (add_zero i) := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
tauto
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
exact ext_to φ i j hij h₁ h₂
lemma ext_from (i j : ℤ) (hij : j + 1 = i) {A : C} {f g : (mappingCone φ).X j ⟶ A}
(h₁ : (inl φ).v i j (by omega) ≫ f = (inl φ).v i j (by omega) ≫ g)
(h₂ : (inr φ).f j ≫ f = (inr φ).f j ≫ g) :
f = g :=
homotopyCofiber.ext_from_X φ i j hij h₁ h₂
lemma ext_from_iff (i j : ℤ) (hij : j + 1 = i) {A : C} (f g : (mappingCone φ).X j ⟶ A) :
f = g ↔ (inl φ).v i j (by omega) ≫ f = (inl φ).v i j (by omega) ≫ g ∧
(inr φ).f j ≫ f = (inr φ).f j ≫ g := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
tauto
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
exact ext_from φ i j hij h₁ h₂
lemma decomp_to {i : ℤ} {A : C} (f : A ⟶ (mappingCone φ).X i) (j : ℤ) (hij : i + 1 = j) :
∃ (a : A ⟶ F.X j) (b : A ⟶ G.X i), f = a ≫ (inl φ).v j i (by omega) + b ≫ (inr φ).f i :=
⟨f ≫ (fst φ).1.v i j hij, f ≫ (snd φ).v i i (add_zero i),
by apply ext_to φ i j hij <;> simp⟩
lemma decomp_from {j : ℤ} {A : C} (f : (mappingCone φ).X j ⟶ A) (i : ℤ) (hij : j + 1 = i) :
∃ (a : F.X i ⟶ A) (b : G.X j ⟶ A),
f = (fst φ).1.v j i hij ≫ a + (snd φ).v j j (add_zero j) ≫ b :=
⟨(inl φ).v i j (by omega) ≫ f, (inr φ).f j ≫ f,
by apply ext_from φ i j hij <;> simp⟩
lemma ext_cochain_to_iff (i j : ℤ) (hij : i + 1 = j)
{K : CochainComplex C ℤ} {γ₁ γ₂ : Cochain K (mappingCone φ) i} :
γ₁ = γ₂ ↔ γ₁.comp (fst φ).1 hij = γ₂.comp (fst φ).1 hij ∧
γ₁.comp (snd φ) (add_zero i) = γ₂.comp (snd φ) (add_zero i) := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
tauto
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
ext p q hpq
rw [ext_to_iff φ q (q + 1) rfl]
replace h₁ := Cochain.congr_v h₁ p (q + 1) (by omega)
replace h₂ := Cochain.congr_v h₂ p q hpq
simp only [Cochain.comp_v _ _ _ p q (q + 1) hpq rfl] at h₁
simp only [Cochain.comp_zero_cochain_v] at h₂
exact ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
lemma ext_cochain_from_iff (i j : ℤ) (hij : i + 1 = j)
{K : CochainComplex C ℤ} {γ₁ γ₂ : Cochain (mappingCone φ) K j} :
γ₁ = γ₂ ↔
(inl φ).comp γ₁ (show _ = i by omega) = (inl φ).comp γ₂ (by omega) ∧
(Cochain.ofHom (inr φ)).comp γ₁ (zero_add j) =
(Cochain.ofHom (inr φ)).comp γ₂ (zero_add j) := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
tauto
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
ext p q hpq
rw [ext_from_iff φ (p + 1) p rfl]
replace h₁ := Cochain.congr_v h₁ (p + 1) q (by omega)
replace h₂ := Cochain.congr_v h₂ p q (by omega)
simp only [Cochain.comp_v (inl φ) _ _ (p + 1) p q (by omega) hpq] at h₁
simp only [Cochain.zero_cochain_comp_v, Cochain.ofHom_v] at h₂
exact ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
lemma id :
(fst φ).1.comp (inl φ) (add_neg_cancel 1) +
(snd φ).comp (Cochain.ofHom (inr φ)) (add_zero 0) = Cochain.ofHom (𝟙 _) := by
simp [ext_cochain_from_iff φ (-1) 0 (neg_add_cancel 1)]
lemma id_X (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + 1 = q) :
(fst φ).1.v p q hpq ≫ (inl φ).v q p (by omega) +
(snd φ).v p p (add_zero p) ≫ (inr φ).f p = 𝟙 ((mappingCone φ).X p) := by
simpa only [Cochain.add_v, Cochain.comp_zero_cochain_v, Cochain.ofHom_v, id_f,
Cochain.comp_v _ _ (add_neg_cancel 1) p q p hpq (by omega)]
using Cochain.congr_v (id φ) p p (add_zero p)
@[reassoc]
lemma inl_v_d (i j k : ℤ) (hij : i + (-1) = j) (hik : k + (-1) = i) :
(inl φ).v i j hij ≫ (mappingCone φ).d j i =
φ.f i ≫ (inr φ).f i - F.d i k ≫ (inl φ).v _ _ hik := by
dsimp [mappingCone, inl, inr]
rw [homotopyCofiber.inlX_d φ j i k (by dsimp; omega) (by dsimp; omega)]
abel
@[reassoc]
lemma inr_f_d (n₁ n₂ : ℤ) :
(inr φ).f n₁ ≫ (mappingCone φ).d n₁ n₂ = G.d n₁ n₂ ≫ (inr φ).f n₂ := by
simp
@[reassoc]
lemma d_fst_v (i j k : ℤ) (hij : i + 1 = j) (hjk : j + 1 = k) :
(mappingCone φ).d i j ≫ (fst φ).1.v j k hjk =
-(fst φ).1.v i j hij ≫ F.d j k := by
apply homotopyCofiber.d_fstX
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma d_fst_v' (i j : ℤ) (hij : i + 1 = j) :
(mappingCone φ).d (i - 1) i ≫ (fst φ).1.v i j hij =
-(fst φ).1.v (i - 1) i (by omega) ≫ F.d i j :=
d_fst_v φ (i - 1) i j (by omega) hij
@[reassoc]
lemma d_snd_v (i j : ℤ) (hij : i + 1 = j) :
(mappingCone φ).d i j ≫ (snd φ).v j j (add_zero _) =
(fst φ).1.v i j hij ≫ φ.f j + (snd φ).v i i (add_zero i) ≫ G.d i j := by
dsimp [mappingCone, snd, fst]
simp only [Cochain.ofHoms_v]
apply homotopyCofiber.d_sndX
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma d_snd_v' (n : ℤ) :
(mappingCone φ).d (n - 1) n ≫ (snd φ).v n n (add_zero n) =
(fst φ : Cochain (mappingCone φ) F 1).v (n - 1) n (by omega) ≫ φ.f n +
(snd φ).v (n - 1) (n - 1) (add_zero _) ≫ G.d (n - 1) n := by
apply d_snd_v
@[simp]
lemma δ_inl :
δ (-1) 0 (inl φ) = Cochain.ofHom (φ ≫ inr φ) := by
ext p
simp [δ_v (-1) 0 (neg_add_cancel 1) (inl φ) p p (add_zero p) _ _ rfl rfl,
inl_v_d φ p (p - 1) (p + 1) (by omega) (by omega)]
@[simp]
lemma δ_snd :
δ 0 1 (snd φ) = -(fst φ).1.comp (Cochain.ofHom φ) (add_zero 1) := by
ext p q hpq
simp [d_snd_v φ p q hpq]
section
variable {K : CochainComplex C ℤ} {n m : ℤ}
/-- Given `φ : F ⟶ G`, this is the cochain in `Cochain (mappingCone φ) K n` that is
constructed from two cochains `α : Cochain F K m` (with `m + 1 = n`) and `β : Cochain F K n`. -/
noncomputable def descCochain (α : Cochain F K m) (β : Cochain G K n) (h : m + 1 = n) :
Cochain (mappingCone φ) K n :=
(fst φ).1.comp α (by rw [← h, add_comm]) + (snd φ).comp β (zero_add n)
variable (α : Cochain F K m) (β : Cochain G K n) (h : m + 1 = n)
@[simp]
lemma inl_descCochain :
(inl φ).comp (descCochain φ α β h) (by omega) = α := by
simp [descCochain]
@[simp]
lemma inr_descCochain :
(Cochain.ofHom (inr φ)).comp (descCochain φ α β h) (zero_add n) = β := by
simp [descCochain]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inl_v_descCochain_v (p₁ p₂ p₃ : ℤ) (h₁₂ : p₁ + (-1) = p₂) (h₂₃ : p₂ + n = p₃) :
(inl φ).v p₁ p₂ h₁₂ ≫ (descCochain φ α β h).v p₂ p₃ h₂₃ =
α.v p₁ p₃ (by rw [← h₂₃, ← h₁₂, ← h, add_comm m, add_assoc, neg_add_cancel_left]) := by
simpa only [Cochain.comp_v _ _ (show -1 + n = m by omega) p₁ p₂ p₃
(by omega) (by omega)] using
Cochain.congr_v (inl_descCochain φ α β h) p₁ p₃ (by omega)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inr_f_descCochain_v (p₁ p₂ : ℤ) (h₁₂ : p₁ + n = p₂) :
(inr φ).f p₁ ≫ (descCochain φ α β h).v p₁ p₂ h₁₂ = β.v p₁ p₂ h₁₂ := by
simpa only [Cochain.comp_v _ _ (zero_add n) p₁ p₁ p₂ (add_zero p₁) h₁₂, Cochain.ofHom_v]
using Cochain.congr_v (inr_descCochain φ α β h) p₁ p₂ (by omega)
lemma δ_descCochain (n' : ℤ) (hn' : n + 1 = n') :
δ n n' (descCochain φ α β h) =
(fst φ).1.comp (δ m n α +
n'.negOnePow • (Cochain.ofHom φ).comp β (zero_add n)) (by omega) +
(snd φ).comp (δ n n' β) (zero_add n') := by
dsimp only [descCochain]
simp only [δ_add, Cochain.comp_add, δ_comp (fst φ).1 α _ 2 n n' hn' (by omega) (by omega),
Cocycle.δ_eq_zero, Cochain.zero_comp, smul_zero, add_zero,
δ_comp (snd φ) β (zero_add n) 1 n' n' hn' (zero_add 1) hn', δ_snd, Cochain.neg_comp,
smul_neg, Cochain.comp_assoc_of_second_is_zero_cochain, Cochain.comp_units_smul, ← hn',
Int.negOnePow_succ, Units.neg_smul, Cochain.comp_neg]
abel
end
/-- Given `φ : F ⟶ G`, this is the cocycle in `Cocycle (mappingCone φ) K n` that is
constructed from `α : Cochain F K m` (with `m + 1 = n`) and `β : Cocycle F K n`,
when a suitable cocycle relation is satisfied. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def descCocycle {K : CochainComplex C ℤ} {n m : ℤ}
(α : Cochain F K m) (β : Cocycle G K n)
(h : m + 1 = n) (eq : δ m n α = n.negOnePow • (Cochain.ofHom φ).comp β.1 (zero_add n)) :
Cocycle (mappingCone φ) K n :=
Cocycle.mk (descCochain φ α β.1 h) (n + 1) rfl
(by simp [δ_descCochain _ _ _ _ _ rfl, eq, Int.negOnePow_succ])
section
variable {K : CochainComplex C ℤ}
/-- Given `φ : F ⟶ G`, this is the morphism `mappingCone φ ⟶ K` that is constructed
from a cochain `α : Cochain F K (-1)` and a morphism `β : G ⟶ K` such that
`δ (-1) 0 α = Cochain.ofHom (φ ≫ β)`. -/
noncomputable def desc (α : Cochain F K (-1)) (β : G ⟶ K)
(eq : δ (-1) 0 α = Cochain.ofHom (φ ≫ β)) : mappingCone φ ⟶ K :=
Cocycle.homOf (descCocycle φ α (Cocycle.ofHom β) (neg_add_cancel 1) (by simp [eq]))
variable (α : Cochain F K (-1)) (β : G ⟶ K) (eq : δ (-1) 0 α = Cochain.ofHom (φ ≫ β))
@[simp]
lemma ofHom_desc :
Cochain.ofHom (desc φ α β eq) = descCochain φ α (Cochain.ofHom β) (neg_add_cancel 1) := by
simp [desc]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inl_v_desc_f (p q : ℤ) (h : p + (-1) = q) :
(inl φ).v p q h ≫ (desc φ α β eq).f q = α.v p q h := by
simp [desc]
lemma inl_desc :
(inl φ).comp (Cochain.ofHom (desc φ α β eq)) (add_zero _) = α := by
simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inr_f_desc_f (p : ℤ) :
(inr φ).f p ≫ (desc φ α β eq).f p = β.f p := by
simp [desc]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma inr_desc : inr φ ≫ desc φ α β eq = β := by aesop_cat
lemma desc_f (p q : ℤ) (hpq : p + 1 = q) :
(desc φ α β eq).f p = (fst φ).1.v p q hpq ≫ α.v q p (by omega) +
(snd φ).v p p (add_zero p) ≫ β.f p := by
simp [ext_from_iff _ _ _ hpq]
end
/-- Constructor for homotopies between morphisms from a mapping cone. -/
noncomputable def descHomotopy {K : CochainComplex C ℤ} (f₁ f₂ : mappingCone φ ⟶ K)
(γ₁ : Cochain F K (-2)) (γ₂ : Cochain G K (-1))
(h₁ : (inl φ).comp (Cochain.ofHom f₁) (add_zero (-1)) =
δ (-2) (-1) γ₁ + (Cochain.ofHom φ).comp γ₂ (zero_add (-1)) +
(inl φ).comp (Cochain.ofHom f₂) (add_zero (-1)))
(h₂ : Cochain.ofHom (inr φ ≫ f₁) = δ (-1) 0 γ₂ + Cochain.ofHom (inr φ ≫ f₂)) :
Homotopy f₁ f₂ :=
(Cochain.equivHomotopy f₁ f₂).symm ⟨descCochain φ γ₁ γ₂ (by norm_num), by
simp only [Cochain.ofHom_comp] at h₂
simp [ext_cochain_from_iff _ _ _ (neg_add_cancel 1),
δ_descCochain _ _ _ _ _ (neg_add_cancel 1), h₁, h₂]⟩
section
variable {K : CochainComplex C ℤ} {n m : ℤ}
/-- Given `φ : F ⟶ G`, this is the cochain in `Cochain (mappingCone φ) K n` that is
constructed from two cochains `α : Cochain F K m` (with `m + 1 = n`) and `β : Cochain F K n`. -/
noncomputable def liftCochain (α : Cochain K F m) (β : Cochain K G n) (h : n + 1 = m) :
Cochain K (mappingCone φ) n :=
α.comp (inl φ) (by omega) + β.comp (Cochain.ofHom (inr φ)) (add_zero n)
variable (α : Cochain K F m) (β : Cochain K G n) (h : n + 1 = m)
@[simp]
lemma liftCochain_fst :
| (liftCochain φ α β h).comp (fst φ).1 h = α := by
simp [liftCochain]
@[simp]
lemma liftCochain_snd :
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/HomotopyCategory/MappingCone.lean | 420 | 424 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Johannes Hölzl, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Indexed
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.IsBounded
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.CompleteLattice
/-!
# liminfs and limsups of functions and filters
Defines the liminf/limsup of a function taking values in a conditionally complete lattice, with
respect to an arbitrary filter.
We define `limsSup f` (`limsInf f`) where `f` is a filter taking values in a conditionally complete
lattice. `limsSup f` is the smallest element `a` such that, eventually, `u ≤ a` (and vice versa for
`limsInf f`). To work with the Limsup along a function `u` use `limsSup (map u f)`.
Usually, one defines the Limsup as `inf (sup s)` where the Inf is taken over all sets in the filter.
For instance, in ℕ along a function `u`, this is `inf_n (sup_{k ≥ n} u k)` (and the latter quantity
decreases with `n`, so this is in fact a limit.). There is however a difficulty: it is well possible
that `u` is not bounded on the whole space, only eventually (think of `limsup (fun x ↦ 1/x)` on ℝ.
Then there is no guarantee that the quantity above really decreases (the value of the `sup`
beforehand is not really well defined, as one can not use ∞), so that the Inf could be anything.
So one can not use this `inf sup ...` definition in conditionally complete lattices, and one has
to use a less tractable definition.
In conditionally complete lattices, the definition is only useful for filters which are eventually
bounded above (otherwise, the Limsup would morally be +∞, which does not belong to the space) and
which are frequently bounded below (otherwise, the Limsup would morally be -∞, which is not in the
space either). We start with definitions of these concepts for arbitrary filters, before turning to
the definitions of Limsup and Liminf.
In complete lattices, however, it coincides with the `Inf Sup` definition.
-/
open Filter Set Function
variable {α β γ ι ι' : Type*}
namespace Filter
section ConditionallyCompleteLattice
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] {s : Set α} {u : β → α}
/-- The `limsSup` of a filter `f` is the infimum of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`,
holds `x ≤ a`. -/
def limsSup (f : Filter α) : α :=
sInf { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ a }
/-- The `limsInf` of a filter `f` is the supremum of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`,
holds `x ≥ a`. -/
def limsInf (f : Filter α) : α :=
sSup { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ n }
/-- The `limsup` of a function `u` along a filter `f` is the infimum of the `a` such that,
eventually for `f`, holds `u x ≤ a`. -/
def limsup (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) : α :=
limsSup (map u f)
/-- The `liminf` of a function `u` along a filter `f` is the supremum of the `a` such that,
eventually for `f`, holds `u x ≥ a`. -/
def liminf (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) : α :=
limsInf (map u f)
/-- The `blimsup` of a function `u` along a filter `f`, bounded by a predicate `p`, is the infimum
of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`, `u x ≤ a` whenever `p x` holds. -/
def blimsup (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) (p : β → Prop) :=
sInf { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → u x ≤ a }
/-- The `bliminf` of a function `u` along a filter `f`, bounded by a predicate `p`, is the supremum
of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`, `a ≤ u x` whenever `p x` holds. -/
def bliminf (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) (p : β → Prop) :=
sSup { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → a ≤ u x }
section
variable {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop}
theorem limsup_eq : limsup u f = sInf { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, u n ≤ a } :=
rfl
theorem liminf_eq : liminf u f = sSup { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ u n } :=
rfl
theorem blimsup_eq : blimsup u f p = sInf { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → u x ≤ a } :=
rfl
theorem bliminf_eq : bliminf u f p = sSup { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → a ≤ u x } :=
rfl
lemma liminf_comp (u : β → α) (v : γ → β) (f : Filter γ) :
liminf (u ∘ v) f = liminf u (map v f) := rfl
lemma limsup_comp (u : β → α) (v : γ → β) (f : Filter γ) :
limsup (u ∘ v) f = limsup u (map v f) := rfl
end
@[simp]
theorem blimsup_true (f : Filter β) (u : β → α) : (blimsup u f fun _ => True) = limsup u f := by
simp [blimsup_eq, limsup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_true (f : Filter β) (u : β → α) : (bliminf u f fun _ => True) = liminf u f := by
simp [bliminf_eq, liminf_eq]
lemma blimsup_eq_limsup {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop} :
blimsup u f p = limsup u (f ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) := by
simp only [blimsup_eq, limsup_eq, eventually_inf_principal, mem_setOf_eq]
lemma bliminf_eq_liminf {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop} :
bliminf u f p = liminf u (f ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) :=
blimsup_eq_limsup (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem blimsup_eq_limsup_subtype {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop} :
blimsup u f p = limsup (u ∘ ((↑) : { x | p x } → β)) (comap (↑) f) := by
rw [blimsup_eq_limsup, limsup, limsup, ← map_map, map_comap_setCoe_val]
theorem bliminf_eq_liminf_subtype {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop} :
bliminf u f p = liminf (u ∘ ((↑) : { x | p x } → β)) (comap (↑) f) :=
blimsup_eq_limsup_subtype (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem limsSup_le_of_le {f : Filter α} {a}
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ a) : limsSup f ≤ a :=
csInf_le hf h
theorem le_limsInf_of_le {f : Filter α} {a}
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ n) : a ≤ limsInf f :=
le_csSup hf h
theorem limsup_le_of_le {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a}
(hf : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in f, u n ≤ a) : limsup u f ≤ a :=
csInf_le hf h
theorem le_liminf_of_le {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a}
(hf : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ u n) : a ≤ liminf u f :=
le_csSup hf h
theorem le_limsSup_of_le {f : Filter α} {a}
(hf : f.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ b) → a ≤ b) : a ≤ limsSup f :=
le_csInf hf h
theorem limsInf_le_of_le {f : Filter α} {a}
(hf : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, b ≤ n) → b ≤ a) : limsInf f ≤ a :=
csSup_le hf h
theorem le_limsup_of_le {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a}
(hf : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, u n ≤ b) → a ≤ b) : a ≤ limsup u f :=
le_csInf hf h
theorem liminf_le_of_le {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a}
(hf : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, b ≤ u n) → b ≤ a) : liminf u f ≤ a :=
csSup_le hf h
theorem limsInf_le_limsSup {f : Filter α} [NeBot f]
(h₁ : f.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsInf f ≤ limsSup f :=
liminf_le_of_le h₂ fun a₀ ha₀ =>
le_limsup_of_le h₁ fun a₁ ha₁ =>
show a₀ ≤ a₁ from
let ⟨_, hb₀, hb₁⟩ := (ha₀.and ha₁).exists
le_trans hb₀ hb₁
theorem liminf_le_limsup {f : Filter β} [NeBot f] {u : β → α}
(h : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h' : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ limsup u f :=
limsInf_le_limsSup h h'
theorem limsSup_le_limsSup {f g : Filter α}
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ a, (∀ᶠ n in g, n ≤ a) → ∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ a) : limsSup f ≤ limsSup g :=
csInf_le_csInf hf hg h
theorem limsInf_le_limsInf {f g : Filter α}
(hf : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ a, (∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ n) → ∀ᶠ n in g, a ≤ n) : limsInf f ≤ limsInf g :=
csSup_le_csSup hg hf h
theorem limsup_le_limsup {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : u ≤ᶠ[f] v)
(hu : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hv : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsup u f ≤ limsup v f :=
limsSup_le_limsSup hu hv fun _ => h.trans
theorem liminf_le_liminf {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ a in f, u a ≤ v a)
(hu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hv : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ liminf v f :=
limsup_le_limsup (β := βᵒᵈ) h hv hu
theorem limsSup_le_limsSup_of_le {f g : Filter α} (h : f ≤ g)
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsSup f ≤ limsSup g :=
limsSup_le_limsSup hf hg fun _ ha => h ha
theorem limsInf_le_limsInf_of_le {f g : Filter α} (h : g ≤ f)
(hf : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsInf f ≤ limsInf g :=
limsInf_le_limsInf hf hg fun _ ha => h ha
theorem limsup_le_limsup_of_le {α β} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f g : Filter α} (h : f ≤ g)
{u : α → β}
(hf : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsup u f ≤ limsup u g :=
limsSup_le_limsSup_of_le (map_mono h) hf hg
theorem liminf_le_liminf_of_le {α β} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f g : Filter α} (h : g ≤ f)
{u : α → β}
(hf : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ liminf u g :=
limsInf_le_limsInf_of_le (map_mono h) hf hg
lemma limsSup_principal_eq_csSup (h : BddAbove s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : limsSup (𝓟 s) = sSup s := by
simp only [limsSup, eventually_principal]; exact csInf_upperBounds_eq_csSup h hs
lemma limsInf_principal_eq_csSup (h : BddBelow s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : limsInf (𝓟 s) = sInf s :=
limsSup_principal_eq_csSup (α := αᵒᵈ) h hs
lemma limsup_top_eq_ciSup [Nonempty β] (hu : BddAbove (range u)) : limsup u ⊤ = ⨆ i, u i := by
rw [limsup, map_top, limsSup_principal_eq_csSup hu (range_nonempty _), sSup_range]
lemma liminf_top_eq_ciInf [Nonempty β] (hu : BddBelow (range u)) : liminf u ⊤ = ⨅ i, u i := by
rw [liminf, map_top, limsInf_principal_eq_csSup hu (range_nonempty _), sInf_range]
theorem limsup_congr {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ a in f, u a = v a) : limsup u f = limsup v f := by
rw [limsup_eq]
congr with b
exact eventually_congr (h.mono fun x hx => by simp [hx])
theorem blimsup_congr {f : Filter β} {u v : β → α} {p : β → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ a in f, p a → u a = v a) :
blimsup u f p = blimsup v f p := by
simpa only [blimsup_eq_limsup] using limsup_congr <| eventually_inf_principal.2 h
theorem bliminf_congr {f : Filter β} {u v : β → α} {p : β → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ a in f, p a → u a = v a) :
bliminf u f p = bliminf v f p :=
blimsup_congr (α := αᵒᵈ) h
theorem liminf_congr {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ a in f, u a = v a) : liminf u f = liminf v f :=
limsup_congr (β := βᵒᵈ) h
@[simp]
theorem limsup_const {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} [NeBot f]
(b : β) : limsup (fun _ => b) f = b := by
simpa only [limsup_eq, eventually_const] using csInf_Ici
@[simp]
theorem liminf_const {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} [NeBot f]
(b : β) : liminf (fun _ => b) f = b :=
limsup_const (β := βᵒᵈ) b
theorem HasBasis.liminf_eq_sSup_iUnion_iInter {ι ι' : Type*} {f : ι → α} {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} (hv : v.HasBasis p s) :
liminf f v = sSup (⋃ (j : Subtype p), ⋂ (i : s j), Iic (f i)) := by
simp_rw [liminf_eq, hv.eventually_iff]
congr
ext x
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, iInter_coe_set, mem_iUnion, mem_iInter, mem_Iic, Subtype.exists,
exists_prop]
theorem HasBasis.liminf_eq_sSup_univ_of_empty {f : ι → α} {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} (hv : v.HasBasis p s) (i : ι') (hi : p i) (h'i : s i = ∅) :
liminf f v = sSup univ := by
simp [hv.eq_bot_iff.2 ⟨i, hi, h'i⟩, liminf_eq]
theorem HasBasis.limsup_eq_sInf_iUnion_iInter {ι ι' : Type*} {f : ι → α} {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} (hv : v.HasBasis p s) :
limsup f v = sInf (⋃ (j : Subtype p), ⋂ (i : s j), Ici (f i)) :=
HasBasis.liminf_eq_sSup_iUnion_iInter (α := αᵒᵈ) hv
theorem HasBasis.limsup_eq_sInf_univ_of_empty {f : ι → α} {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} (hv : v.HasBasis p s) (i : ι') (hi : p i) (h'i : s i = ∅) :
limsup f v = sInf univ :=
HasBasis.liminf_eq_sSup_univ_of_empty (α := αᵒᵈ) hv i hi h'i
@[simp]
theorem liminf_nat_add (f : ℕ → α) (k : ℕ) :
liminf (fun i => f (i + k)) atTop = liminf f atTop := by
rw [← Function.comp_def, liminf, liminf, ← map_map, map_add_atTop_eq_nat]
@[simp]
theorem limsup_nat_add (f : ℕ → α) (k : ℕ) : limsup (fun i => f (i + k)) atTop = limsup f atTop :=
@liminf_nat_add αᵒᵈ _ f k
end ConditionallyCompleteLattice
section CompleteLattice
variable [CompleteLattice α]
@[simp]
theorem limsSup_bot : limsSup (⊥ : Filter α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique <| sInf_le <| by simp
@[simp] theorem limsup_bot (f : β → α) : limsup f ⊥ = ⊥ := by simp [limsup]
@[simp]
theorem limsInf_bot : limsInf (⊥ : Filter α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| le_sSup <| by simp
@[simp] theorem liminf_bot (f : β → α) : liminf f ⊥ = ⊤ := by simp [liminf]
@[simp]
theorem limsSup_top : limsSup (⊤ : Filter α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| le_sInf <| by simpa [eq_univ_iff_forall] using fun b hb => top_unique <| hb _
@[simp]
theorem limsInf_top : limsInf (⊤ : Filter α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique <| sSup_le <| by simpa [eq_univ_iff_forall] using fun b hb => bot_unique <| hb _
@[simp]
theorem blimsup_false {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : (blimsup u f fun _ => False) = ⊥ := by
simp [blimsup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_false {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : (bliminf u f fun _ => False) = ⊤ := by
simp [bliminf_eq]
/-- Same as limsup_const applied to `⊥` but without the `NeBot f` assumption -/
@[simp]
theorem limsup_const_bot {f : Filter β} : limsup (fun _ : β => (⊥ : α)) f = (⊥ : α) := by
rw [limsup_eq, eq_bot_iff]
exact sInf_le (Eventually.of_forall fun _ => le_rfl)
/-- Same as limsup_const applied to `⊤` but without the `NeBot f` assumption -/
@[simp]
theorem liminf_const_top {f : Filter β} : liminf (fun _ : β => (⊤ : α)) f = (⊤ : α) :=
limsup_const_bot (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem HasBasis.limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup {ι} {p : ι → Prop} {s} {f : Filter α} (h : f.HasBasis p s) :
limsSup f = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), sSup (s i) :=
le_antisymm (le_iInf₂ fun i hi => sInf_le <| h.eventually_iff.2 ⟨i, hi, fun _ => le_sSup⟩)
(le_sInf fun _ ha =>
let ⟨_, hi, ha⟩ := h.eventually_iff.1 ha
iInf₂_le_of_le _ hi <| sSup_le ha)
theorem HasBasis.limsInf_eq_iSup_sInf {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} {f : Filter α}
(h : f.HasBasis p s) : limsInf f = ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), sInf (s i) :=
HasBasis.limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup (α := αᵒᵈ) h
theorem limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup {f : Filter α} : limsSup f = ⨅ s ∈ f, sSup s :=
f.basis_sets.limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup
theorem limsInf_eq_iSup_sInf {f : Filter α} : limsInf f = ⨆ s ∈ f, sInf s :=
limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem limsup_le_iSup {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : limsup u f ≤ ⨆ n, u n :=
limsup_le_of_le (by isBoundedDefault) (Eventually.of_forall (le_iSup u))
theorem iInf_le_liminf {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : ⨅ n, u n ≤ liminf u f :=
le_liminf_of_le (by isBoundedDefault) (Eventually.of_forall (iInf_le u))
/-- In a complete lattice, the limsup of a function is the infimum over sets `s` in the filter
of the supremum of the function over `s` -/
theorem limsup_eq_iInf_iSup {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : limsup u f = ⨅ s ∈ f, ⨆ a ∈ s, u a :=
(f.basis_sets.map u).limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup.trans <| by simp only [sSup_image, id]
theorem limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat {u : ℕ → α} : limsup u atTop = ⨅ n : ℕ, ⨆ i ≥ n, u i :=
(atTop_basis.map u).limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup.trans <| by simp only [sSup_image, iInf_const]; rfl
theorem limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat' {u : ℕ → α} : limsup u atTop = ⨅ n : ℕ, ⨆ i : ℕ, u (i + n) := by
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat, iSup_ge_eq_iSup_nat_add]
theorem HasBasis.limsup_eq_iInf_iSup {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set β} {f : Filter β} {u : β → α}
(h : f.HasBasis p s) : limsup u f = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), ⨆ a ∈ s i, u a :=
(h.map u).limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup.trans <| by simp only [sSup_image, id]
lemma limsSup_principal_eq_sSup (s : Set α) : limsSup (𝓟 s) = sSup s := by
simpa only [limsSup, eventually_principal] using sInf_upperBounds_eq_csSup s
lemma limsInf_principal_eq_sInf (s : Set α) : limsInf (𝓟 s) = sInf s := by
simpa only [limsInf, eventually_principal] using sSup_lowerBounds_eq_sInf s
@[simp] lemma limsup_top_eq_iSup (u : β → α) : limsup u ⊤ = ⨆ i, u i := by
rw [limsup, map_top, limsSup_principal_eq_sSup, sSup_range]
@[simp] lemma liminf_top_eq_iInf (u : β → α) : liminf u ⊤ = ⨅ i, u i := by
rw [liminf, map_top, limsInf_principal_eq_sInf, sInf_range]
theorem blimsup_congr' {f : Filter β} {p q : β → Prop} {u : β → α}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ≠ ⊥ → (p x ↔ q x)) : blimsup u f p = blimsup u f q := by
simp only [blimsup_eq]
congr with a
refine eventually_congr (h.mono fun b hb => ?_)
rcases eq_or_ne (u b) ⊥ with hu | hu; · simp [hu]
rw [hb hu]
theorem bliminf_congr' {f : Filter β} {p q : β → Prop} {u : β → α}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ≠ ⊤ → (p x ↔ q x)) : bliminf u f p = bliminf u f q :=
blimsup_congr' (α := αᵒᵈ) h
lemma HasBasis.blimsup_eq_iInf_iSup {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set β} {f : Filter β} {u : β → α}
(hf : f.HasBasis p s) {q : β → Prop} :
blimsup u f q = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), ⨆ a ∈ s i, ⨆ (_ : q a), u a := by
simp only [blimsup_eq_limsup, (hf.inf_principal _).limsup_eq_iInf_iSup, mem_inter_iff, iSup_and,
mem_setOf_eq]
theorem blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup {f : Filter β} {p : β → Prop} {u : β → α} :
blimsup u f p = ⨅ s ∈ f, ⨆ (b) (_ : p b ∧ b ∈ s), u b := by
simp only [f.basis_sets.blimsup_eq_iInf_iSup, iSup_and', id, and_comm]
theorem blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup_of_nat {p : ℕ → Prop} {u : ℕ → α} :
blimsup u atTop p = ⨅ i, ⨆ (j) (_ : p j ∧ i ≤ j), u j := by
simp only [atTop_basis.blimsup_eq_iInf_iSup, @and_comm (p _), iSup_and, mem_Ici, iInf_true]
/-- In a complete lattice, the liminf of a function is the infimum over sets `s` in the filter
of the supremum of the function over `s` -/
theorem liminf_eq_iSup_iInf {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : liminf u f = ⨆ s ∈ f, ⨅ a ∈ s, u a :=
limsup_eq_iInf_iSup (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem liminf_eq_iSup_iInf_of_nat {u : ℕ → α} : liminf u atTop = ⨆ n : ℕ, ⨅ i ≥ n, u i :=
@limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat αᵒᵈ _ u
theorem liminf_eq_iSup_iInf_of_nat' {u : ℕ → α} : liminf u atTop = ⨆ n : ℕ, ⨅ i : ℕ, u (i + n) :=
@limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat' αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem HasBasis.liminf_eq_iSup_iInf {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set β} {f : Filter β} {u : β → α}
(h : f.HasBasis p s) : liminf u f = ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), ⨅ a ∈ s i, u a :=
HasBasis.limsup_eq_iInf_iSup (α := αᵒᵈ) h
theorem bliminf_eq_iSup_biInf {f : Filter β} {p : β → Prop} {u : β → α} :
bliminf u f p = ⨆ s ∈ f, ⨅ (b) (_ : p b ∧ b ∈ s), u b :=
@blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup αᵒᵈ β _ f p u
theorem bliminf_eq_iSup_biInf_of_nat {p : ℕ → Prop} {u : ℕ → α} :
bliminf u atTop p = ⨆ i, ⨅ (j) (_ : p j ∧ i ≤ j), u j :=
@blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup_of_nat αᵒᵈ _ p u
theorem limsup_eq_sInf_sSup {ι R : Type*} (F : Filter ι) [CompleteLattice R] (a : ι → R) :
limsup a F = sInf ((fun I => sSup (a '' I)) '' F.sets) := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [limsup_eq]
refine sInf_le_sInf fun x hx => ?_
rcases (mem_image _ F.sets x).mp hx with ⟨I, ⟨I_mem_F, hI⟩⟩
filter_upwards [I_mem_F] with i hi
exact hI ▸ le_sSup (mem_image_of_mem _ hi)
· refine le_sInf fun b hb => sInf_le_of_le (mem_image_of_mem _ hb) <| sSup_le ?_
rintro _ ⟨_, h, rfl⟩
exact h
theorem liminf_eq_sSup_sInf {ι R : Type*} (F : Filter ι) [CompleteLattice R] (a : ι → R) :
liminf a F = sSup ((fun I => sInf (a '' I)) '' F.sets) :=
@Filter.limsup_eq_sInf_sSup ι (OrderDual R) _ _ a
theorem liminf_le_of_frequently_le' {α β} [CompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u : α → β} {x : β}
(h : ∃ᶠ a in f, u a ≤ x) : liminf u f ≤ x := by
rw [liminf_eq]
refine sSup_le fun b hb => ?_
have hbx : ∃ᶠ _ in f, b ≤ x := by
revert h
rw [← not_imp_not, not_frequently, not_frequently]
exact fun h => hb.mp (h.mono fun a hbx hba hax => hbx (hba.trans hax))
exact hbx.exists.choose_spec
theorem le_limsup_of_frequently_le' {α β} [CompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u : α → β} {x : β}
(h : ∃ᶠ a in f, x ≤ u a) : x ≤ limsup u f :=
liminf_le_of_frequently_le' (β := βᵒᵈ) h
/-- If `f : α → α` is a morphism of complete lattices, then the limsup of its iterates of any
`a : α` is a fixed point. -/
@[simp]
theorem _root_.CompleteLatticeHom.apply_limsup_iterate (f : CompleteLatticeHom α α) (a : α) :
f (limsup (fun n => f^[n] a) atTop) = limsup (fun n => f^[n] a) atTop := by
rw [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat', map_iInf]
simp_rw [_root_.map_iSup, ← Function.comp_apply (f := f), ← Function.iterate_succ' f,
← Nat.add_succ]
conv_rhs => rw [iInf_split _ (0 < ·)]
simp only [not_lt, Nat.le_zero, iInf_iInf_eq_left, add_zero, iInf_nat_gt_zero_eq, left_eq_inf]
refine (iInf_le (fun i => ⨆ j, f^[j + (i + 1)] a) 0).trans ?_
simp only [zero_add, Function.comp_apply, iSup_le_iff]
exact fun i => le_iSup (fun i => f^[i] a) (i + 1)
/-- If `f : α → α` is a morphism of complete lattices, then the liminf of its iterates of any
`a : α` is a fixed point. -/
theorem _root_.CompleteLatticeHom.apply_liminf_iterate (f : CompleteLatticeHom α α) (a : α) :
f (liminf (fun n => f^[n] a) atTop) = liminf (fun n => f^[n] a) atTop :=
(CompleteLatticeHom.dual f).apply_limsup_iterate _
variable {f g : Filter β} {p q : β → Prop} {u v : β → α}
theorem blimsup_mono (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) : blimsup u f p ≤ blimsup u f q :=
sInf_le_sInf fun a ha => ha.mono <| by tauto
theorem bliminf_antitone (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) : bliminf u f q ≤ bliminf u f p :=
sSup_le_sSup fun a ha => ha.mono <| by tauto
theorem mono_blimsup' (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → u x ≤ v x) : blimsup u f p ≤ blimsup v f p :=
sInf_le_sInf fun _ ha => (ha.and h).mono fun _ hx hx' => (hx.2 hx').trans (hx.1 hx')
theorem mono_blimsup (h : ∀ x, p x → u x ≤ v x) : blimsup u f p ≤ blimsup v f p :=
mono_blimsup' <| Eventually.of_forall h
theorem mono_bliminf' (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → u x ≤ v x) : bliminf u f p ≤ bliminf v f p :=
sSup_le_sSup fun _ ha => (ha.and h).mono fun _ hx hx' => (hx.1 hx').trans (hx.2 hx')
theorem mono_bliminf (h : ∀ x, p x → u x ≤ v x) : bliminf u f p ≤ bliminf v f p :=
mono_bliminf' <| Eventually.of_forall h
theorem bliminf_antitone_filter (h : f ≤ g) : bliminf u g p ≤ bliminf u f p :=
sSup_le_sSup fun _ ha => ha.filter_mono h
theorem blimsup_monotone_filter (h : f ≤ g) : blimsup u f p ≤ blimsup u g p :=
sInf_le_sInf fun _ ha => ha.filter_mono h
theorem blimsup_and_le_inf : (blimsup u f fun x => p x ∧ q x) ≤ blimsup u f p ⊓ blimsup u f q :=
le_inf (blimsup_mono <| by tauto) (blimsup_mono <| by tauto)
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_inf_aux_left :
(blimsup u f fun x => p x ∧ q x) ≤ blimsup u f p :=
blimsup_and_le_inf.trans inf_le_left
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_inf_aux_right :
(blimsup u f fun x => p x ∧ q x) ≤ blimsup u f q :=
blimsup_and_le_inf.trans inf_le_right
theorem bliminf_sup_le_and : bliminf u f p ⊔ bliminf u f q ≤ bliminf u f fun x => p x ∧ q x :=
blimsup_and_le_inf (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_and_aux_left : bliminf u f p ≤ bliminf u f fun x => p x ∧ q x :=
le_sup_left.trans bliminf_sup_le_and
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_and_aux_right : bliminf u f q ≤ bliminf u f fun x => p x ∧ q x :=
le_sup_right.trans bliminf_sup_le_and
/-- See also `Filter.blimsup_or_eq_sup`. -/
theorem blimsup_sup_le_or : blimsup u f p ⊔ blimsup u f q ≤ blimsup u f fun x => p x ∨ q x :=
sup_le (blimsup_mono <| by tauto) (blimsup_mono <| by tauto)
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_or_aux_left : blimsup u f p ≤ blimsup u f fun x => p x ∨ q x :=
le_sup_left.trans blimsup_sup_le_or
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_or_aux_right : blimsup u f q ≤ blimsup u f fun x => p x ∨ q x :=
le_sup_right.trans blimsup_sup_le_or
/-- See also `Filter.bliminf_or_eq_inf`. -/
theorem bliminf_or_le_inf : (bliminf u f fun x => p x ∨ q x) ≤ bliminf u f p ⊓ bliminf u f q :=
blimsup_sup_le_or (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_or_le_inf_aux_left : (bliminf u f fun x => p x ∨ q x) ≤ bliminf u f p :=
bliminf_or_le_inf.trans inf_le_left
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_or_le_inf_aux_right : (bliminf u f fun x => p x ∨ q x) ≤ bliminf u f q :=
bliminf_or_le_inf.trans inf_le_right
theorem _root_.OrderIso.apply_blimsup [CompleteLattice γ] (e : α ≃o γ) :
e (blimsup u f p) = blimsup (e ∘ u) f p := by
simp only [blimsup_eq, map_sInf, Function.comp_apply, e.image_eq_preimage,
Set.preimage_setOf_eq, e.le_symm_apply]
theorem _root_.OrderIso.apply_bliminf [CompleteLattice γ] (e : α ≃o γ) :
e (bliminf u f p) = bliminf (e ∘ u) f p :=
e.dual.apply_blimsup
theorem _root_.sSupHom.apply_blimsup_le [CompleteLattice γ] (g : sSupHom α γ) :
g (blimsup u f p) ≤ blimsup (g ∘ u) f p := by
simp only [blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup, Function.comp]
refine ((OrderHomClass.mono g).map_iInf₂_le _).trans ?_
simp only [_root_.map_iSup, le_refl]
theorem _root_.sInfHom.le_apply_bliminf [CompleteLattice γ] (g : sInfHom α γ) :
bliminf (g ∘ u) f p ≤ g (bliminf u f p) :=
(sInfHom.dual g).apply_blimsup_le
end CompleteLattice
section CompleteDistribLattice
variable [CompleteDistribLattice α] {f : Filter β} {p q : β → Prop} {u : β → α}
lemma limsup_sup_filter {g} : limsup u (f ⊔ g) = limsup u f ⊔ limsup u g := by
refine le_antisymm ?_
(sup_le (limsup_le_limsup_of_le le_sup_left) (limsup_le_limsup_of_le le_sup_right))
simp_rw [limsup_eq, sInf_sup_eq, sup_sInf_eq, mem_setOf_eq, le_iInf₂_iff]
intro a ha b hb
exact sInf_le ⟨ha.mono fun _ h ↦ h.trans le_sup_left, hb.mono fun _ h ↦ h.trans le_sup_right⟩
lemma liminf_sup_filter {g} : liminf u (f ⊔ g) = liminf u f ⊓ liminf u g :=
limsup_sup_filter (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp]
theorem blimsup_or_eq_sup : (blimsup u f fun x => p x ∨ q x) = blimsup u f p ⊔ blimsup u f q := by
simp only [blimsup_eq_limsup, ← limsup_sup_filter, ← inf_sup_left, sup_principal, setOf_or]
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_or_eq_inf : (bliminf u f fun x => p x ∨ q x) = bliminf u f p ⊓ bliminf u f q :=
blimsup_or_eq_sup (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp]
lemma blimsup_sup_not : blimsup u f p ⊔ blimsup u f (¬p ·) = limsup u f := by
simp_rw [← blimsup_or_eq_sup, or_not, blimsup_true]
@[simp]
lemma bliminf_inf_not : bliminf u f p ⊓ bliminf u f (¬p ·) = liminf u f :=
blimsup_sup_not (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp]
lemma blimsup_not_sup : blimsup u f (¬p ·) ⊔ blimsup u f p = limsup u f := by
simpa only [not_not] using blimsup_sup_not (p := (¬p ·))
@[simp]
lemma bliminf_not_inf : bliminf u f (¬p ·) ⊓ bliminf u f p = liminf u f :=
blimsup_not_sup (α := αᵒᵈ)
lemma limsup_piecewise {s : Set β} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] {v} :
limsup (s.piecewise u v) f = blimsup u f (· ∈ s) ⊔ blimsup v f (· ∉ s) := by
rw [← blimsup_sup_not (p := (· ∈ s))]
refine congr_arg₂ _ (blimsup_congr ?_) (blimsup_congr ?_) <;>
filter_upwards with _ h using by simp [h]
lemma liminf_piecewise {s : Set β} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] {v} :
liminf (s.piecewise u v) f = bliminf u f (· ∈ s) ⊓ bliminf v f (· ∉ s) :=
limsup_piecewise (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem sup_limsup [NeBot f] (a : α) : a ⊔ limsup u f = limsup (fun x => a ⊔ u x) f := by
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup, iSup_sup_eq, sup_iInf₂_eq]
congr; ext s; congr; ext hs; congr
exact (biSup_const (nonempty_of_mem hs)).symm
theorem inf_liminf [NeBot f] (a : α) : a ⊓ liminf u f = liminf (fun x => a ⊓ u x) f :=
sup_limsup (α := αᵒᵈ) a
theorem sup_liminf (a : α) : a ⊔ liminf u f = liminf (fun x => a ⊔ u x) f := by
simp only [liminf_eq_iSup_iInf]
rw [sup_comm, biSup_sup (⟨univ, univ_mem⟩ : ∃ i : Set β, i ∈ f)]
simp_rw [iInf₂_sup_eq, sup_comm (a := a)]
theorem inf_limsup (a : α) : a ⊓ limsup u f = limsup (fun x => a ⊓ u x) f :=
sup_liminf (α := αᵒᵈ) a
end CompleteDistribLattice
section CompleteBooleanAlgebra
variable [CompleteBooleanAlgebra α] (f : Filter β) (u : β → α)
theorem limsup_compl : (limsup u f)ᶜ = liminf (compl ∘ u) f := by
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup, compl_iInf, compl_iSup, liminf_eq_iSup_iInf, Function.comp_apply]
theorem liminf_compl : (liminf u f)ᶜ = limsup (compl ∘ u) f := by
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup, compl_iInf, compl_iSup, liminf_eq_iSup_iInf, Function.comp_apply]
theorem limsup_sdiff (a : α) : limsup u f \ a = limsup (fun b => u b \ a) f := by
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup, sdiff_eq]
rw [biInf_inf (⟨univ, univ_mem⟩ : ∃ i : Set β, i ∈ f)]
simp_rw [inf_comm, inf_iSup₂_eq, inf_comm]
theorem liminf_sdiff [NeBot f] (a : α) : liminf u f \ a = liminf (fun b => u b \ a) f := by
simp only [sdiff_eq, inf_comm _ aᶜ, inf_liminf]
theorem sdiff_limsup [NeBot f] (a : α) : a \ limsup u f = liminf (fun b => a \ u b) f := by
rw [← compl_inj_iff]
simp only [sdiff_eq, liminf_compl, comp_def, compl_inf, compl_compl, sup_limsup]
theorem sdiff_liminf (a : α) : a \ liminf u f = limsup (fun b => a \ u b) f := by
rw [← compl_inj_iff]
simp only [sdiff_eq, limsup_compl, comp_def, compl_inf, compl_compl, sup_liminf]
end CompleteBooleanAlgebra
section SetLattice
variable {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} {𝓕 : Filter ι} {a : α}
lemma mem_liminf_iff_eventually_mem : (a ∈ liminf s 𝓕) ↔ (∀ᶠ i in 𝓕, a ∈ s i) := by
simpa only [liminf_eq_iSup_iInf, iSup_eq_iUnion, iInf_eq_iInter, mem_iUnion, mem_iInter]
using ⟨fun ⟨S, hS, hS'⟩ ↦ mem_of_superset hS (by tauto), fun h ↦ ⟨{i | a ∈ s i}, h, by tauto⟩⟩
lemma mem_limsup_iff_frequently_mem : (a ∈ limsup s 𝓕) ↔ (∃ᶠ i in 𝓕, a ∈ s i) := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, iff_not_comm, ← mem_compl_iff, limsup_compl, comp_apply,
mem_liminf_iff_eventually_mem]
theorem cofinite.blimsup_set_eq :
blimsup s cofinite p = { x | { n | p n ∧ x ∈ s n }.Infinite } := by
simp only [blimsup_eq, le_eq_subset, eventually_cofinite, not_forall, sInf_eq_sInter, exists_prop]
ext x
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun hx t h => ?_⟩ <;> contrapose! h
· simp only [mem_sInter, mem_setOf_eq, not_forall, exists_prop]
exact ⟨{x}ᶜ, by simpa using h, by simp⟩
· exact hx.mono fun i hi => ⟨hi.1, fun hit => h (hit hi.2)⟩
theorem cofinite.bliminf_set_eq : bliminf s cofinite p = { x | { n | p n ∧ x ∉ s n }.Finite } := by
rw [← compl_inj_iff]
simp only [bliminf_eq_iSup_biInf, compl_iInf, compl_iSup, ← blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup,
cofinite.blimsup_set_eq]
rfl
/-- In other words, `limsup cofinite s` is the set of elements lying inside the family `s`
infinitely often. -/
theorem cofinite.limsup_set_eq : limsup s cofinite = { x | { n | x ∈ s n }.Infinite } := by
simp only [← cofinite.blimsup_true s, cofinite.blimsup_set_eq, true_and]
/-- In other words, `liminf cofinite s` is the set of elements lying outside the family `s`
finitely often. -/
theorem cofinite.liminf_set_eq : liminf s cofinite = { x | { n | x ∉ s n }.Finite } := by
simp only [← cofinite.bliminf_true s, cofinite.bliminf_set_eq, true_and]
theorem exists_forall_mem_of_hasBasis_mem_blimsup {l : Filter β} {b : ι → Set β} {q : ι → Prop}
(hl : l.HasBasis q b) {u : β → Set α} {p : β → Prop} {x : α} (hx : x ∈ blimsup u l p) :
∃ f : { i | q i } → β, ∀ i, x ∈ u (f i) ∧ p (f i) ∧ f i ∈ b i := by
rw [blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup] at hx
simp only [iSup_eq_iUnion, iInf_eq_iInter, mem_iInter, mem_iUnion, exists_prop] at hx
choose g hg hg' using hx
refine ⟨fun i : { i | q i } => g (b i) (hl.mem_of_mem i.2), fun i => ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· exact hg' (b i) (hl.mem_of_mem i.2)
· exact hg (b i) (hl.mem_of_mem i.2)
theorem exists_forall_mem_of_hasBasis_mem_blimsup' {l : Filter β} {b : ι → Set β}
(hl : l.HasBasis (fun _ => True) b) {u : β → Set α} {p : β → Prop} {x : α}
(hx : x ∈ blimsup u l p) : ∃ f : ι → β, ∀ i, x ∈ u (f i) ∧ p (f i) ∧ f i ∈ b i := by
obtain ⟨f, hf⟩ := exists_forall_mem_of_hasBasis_mem_blimsup hl hx
exact ⟨fun i => f ⟨i, trivial⟩, fun i => hf ⟨i, trivial⟩⟩
end SetLattice
section ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder
theorem frequently_lt_of_lt_limsSup {f : Filter α} [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] {a : α}
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : a < limsSup f) : ∃ᶠ n in f, a < n := by
contrapose! h
simp only [not_frequently, not_lt] at h
exact limsSup_le_of_le hf h
theorem frequently_lt_of_limsInf_lt {f : Filter α} [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] {a : α}
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : limsInf f < a) : ∃ᶠ n in f, n < a :=
frequently_lt_of_lt_limsSup (α := OrderDual α) hf h
theorem eventually_lt_of_lt_liminf {f : Filter α} [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] {u : α → β}
{b : β} (h : b < liminf u f)
(hu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
∀ᶠ a in f, b < u a := by
obtain ⟨c, hc, hbc⟩ : ∃ (c : β) (_ : c ∈ { c : β | ∀ᶠ n : α in f, c ≤ u n }), b < c := by
simp_rw [exists_prop]
exact exists_lt_of_lt_csSup hu h
exact hc.mono fun x hx => lt_of_lt_of_le hbc hx
theorem eventually_lt_of_limsup_lt {f : Filter α} [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] {u : α → β}
{b : β} (h : limsup u f < b)
(hu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
∀ᶠ a in f, u a < b :=
eventually_lt_of_lt_liminf (β := βᵒᵈ) h hu
section ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α]
/-- If `Filter.limsup u atTop ≤ x`, then for all `ε > 0`, eventually we have `u b < x + ε`. -/
theorem eventually_lt_add_pos_of_limsup_le [Preorder β] [AddZeroClass α] [AddLeftStrictMono α]
{x ε : α} {u : β → α} (hu_bdd : IsBoundedUnder LE.le atTop u) (hu : Filter.limsup u atTop ≤ x)
(hε : 0 < ε) :
∀ᶠ b : β in atTop, u b < x + ε :=
eventually_lt_of_limsup_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt hu (lt_add_of_pos_right x hε)) hu_bdd
/-- If `x ≤ Filter.liminf u atTop`, then for all `ε < 0`, eventually we have `x + ε < u b`. -/
theorem eventually_add_neg_lt_of_le_liminf [Preorder β] [AddZeroClass α] [AddLeftStrictMono α]
{x ε : α} {u : β → α} (hu_bdd : IsBoundedUnder GE.ge atTop u) (hu : x ≤ Filter.liminf u atTop)
(hε : ε < 0) :
∀ᶠ b : β in atTop, x + ε < u b :=
eventually_lt_of_lt_liminf (lt_of_lt_of_le (add_lt_of_neg_right x hε) hu) hu_bdd
/-- If `Filter.limsup u atTop ≤ x`, then for all `ε > 0`, there exists a positive natural
number `n` such that `u n < x + ε`. -/
theorem exists_lt_of_limsup_le [AddZeroClass α] [AddLeftStrictMono α] {x ε : α} {u : ℕ → α}
(hu_bdd : IsBoundedUnder LE.le atTop u) (hu : Filter.limsup u atTop ≤ x) (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ n : PNat, u n < x + ε := by
have h : ∀ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop, u n < x + ε := eventually_lt_add_pos_of_limsup_le hu_bdd hu hε
simp only [eventually_atTop] at h
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := h
exact ⟨⟨n + 1, Nat.succ_pos _⟩, hn (n + 1) (Nat.le_succ _)⟩
/-- If `x ≤ Filter.liminf u atTop`, then for all `ε < 0`, there exists a positive natural
number `n` such that ` x + ε < u n`. -/
theorem exists_lt_of_le_liminf [AddZeroClass α] [AddLeftStrictMono α] {x ε : α} {u : ℕ → α}
(hu_bdd : IsBoundedUnder GE.ge atTop u) (hu : x ≤ Filter.liminf u atTop) (hε : ε < 0) :
∃ n : PNat, x + ε < u n := by
have h : ∀ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop, x + ε < u n := eventually_add_neg_lt_of_le_liminf hu_bdd hu hε
simp only [eventually_atTop] at h
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := h
exact ⟨⟨n + 1, Nat.succ_pos _⟩, hn (n + 1) (Nat.le_succ _)⟩
end ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] {f : Filter α} {u : α → β}
theorem le_limsup_of_frequently_le {b : β} (hu_le : ∃ᶠ x in f, b ≤ u x)
(hu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
b ≤ limsup u f := by
revert hu_le
rw [← not_imp_not, not_frequently]
simp_rw [← lt_iff_not_ge]
exact fun h => eventually_lt_of_limsup_lt h hu
theorem liminf_le_of_frequently_le {b : β} (hu_le : ∃ᶠ x in f, u x ≤ b)
(hu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ b :=
le_limsup_of_frequently_le (β := βᵒᵈ) hu_le hu
theorem frequently_lt_of_lt_limsup {b : β}
(hu : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : b < limsup u f) : ∃ᶠ x in f, b < u x := by
contrapose! h
apply limsSup_le_of_le hu
simpa using h
theorem frequently_lt_of_liminf_lt {b : β}
(hu : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : liminf u f < b) : ∃ᶠ x in f, u x < b :=
frequently_lt_of_lt_limsup (β := βᵒᵈ) hu h
theorem limsup_le_iff {x : β} (h₁ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsup u f ≤ x ↔ ∀ y > x, ∀ᶠ a in f, u a < y := by
refine ⟨fun h _ h' ↦ eventually_lt_of_limsup_lt (h.trans_lt h') h₂, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
--Two cases: Either `x` is a cluster point from above, or it is not.
--In the first case, we use `forall_lt_iff_le'` and split an interval.
--In the second case, the function `u` must eventually be smaller or equal to `x`.
by_cases h' : ∀ y > x, ∃ z, x < z ∧ z < y
· rw [← forall_lt_iff_le']
intro y x_y
rcases h' y x_y with ⟨z, x_z, z_y⟩
exact (limsup_le_of_le h₁ ((h z x_z).mono (fun _ ↦ le_of_lt))).trans_lt z_y
· apply limsup_le_of_le h₁
set_option push_neg.use_distrib true in push_neg at h'
rcases h' with ⟨z, x_z, hz⟩
exact (h z x_z).mono <| fun w hw ↦ (or_iff_left (not_le_of_lt hw)).1 (hz (u w))
/- A version of `limsup_le_iff` with large inequalities in densely ordered spaces.-/
lemma limsup_le_iff' [DenselyOrdered β] {x : β}
(h₁ : IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) f u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) f u := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsup u f ≤ x ↔ ∀ y > x, ∀ᶠ (a : α) in f, u a ≤ y := by
refine ⟨fun h _ h' ↦ (eventually_lt_of_limsup_lt (h.trans_lt h') h₂).mono fun _ ↦ le_of_lt, ?_⟩
rw [← forall_lt_iff_le']
intro h y x_y
obtain ⟨z, x_z, z_y⟩ := exists_between x_y
exact (limsup_le_of_le h₁ (h z x_z)).trans_lt z_y
theorem le_limsup_iff {x : β} (h₁ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
x ≤ limsup u f ↔ ∀ y < x, ∃ᶠ a in f, y < u a := by
refine ⟨fun h _ h' ↦ frequently_lt_of_lt_limsup h₁ (h'.trans_le h), fun h ↦ ?_⟩
--Two cases: Either `x` is a cluster point from below, or it is not.
--In the first case, we use `forall_lt_iff_le` and split an interval.
--In the second case, the function `u` must frequently be larger or equal to `x`.
by_cases h' : ∀ y < x, ∃ z, y < z ∧ z < x
· rw [← forall_lt_iff_le]
intro y y_x
obtain ⟨z, y_z, z_x⟩ := h' y y_x
exact y_z.trans_le (le_limsup_of_frequently_le ((h z z_x).mono (fun _ ↦ le_of_lt)) h₂)
· apply le_limsup_of_frequently_le _ h₂
set_option push_neg.use_distrib true in push_neg at h'
rcases h' with ⟨z, z_x, hz⟩
exact (h z z_x).mono <| fun w hw ↦ (or_iff_right (not_le_of_lt hw)).1 (hz (u w))
/- A version of `le_limsup_iff` with large inequalities in densely ordered spaces.-/
lemma le_limsup_iff' [DenselyOrdered β] {x : β}
(h₁ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
x ≤ limsup u f ↔ ∀ y < x, ∃ᶠ a in f, y ≤ u a := by
refine ⟨fun h _ h' ↦ (frequently_lt_of_lt_limsup h₁ (h'.trans_le h)).mono fun _ ↦ le_of_lt, ?_⟩
rw [← forall_lt_iff_le]
intro h y y_x
obtain ⟨z, y_z, z_x⟩ := exists_between y_x
exact y_z.trans_le (le_limsup_of_frequently_le (h z z_x) h₂)
theorem le_liminf_iff {x : β} (h₁ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
x ≤ liminf u f ↔ ∀ y < x, ∀ᶠ a in f, y < u a := limsup_le_iff (β := βᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂
/- A version of `le_liminf_iff` with large inequalities in densely ordered spaces.-/
theorem le_liminf_iff' [DenselyOrdered β] {x : β}
(h₁ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
x ≤ liminf u f ↔ ∀ y < x, ∀ᶠ a in f, y ≤ u a := limsup_le_iff' (β := βᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂
theorem liminf_le_iff {x : β} (h₁ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ x ↔ ∀ y > x, ∃ᶠ a in f, u a < y := le_limsup_iff (β := βᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂
/- A version of `liminf_le_iff` with large inequalities in densely ordered spaces.-/
theorem liminf_le_iff' [DenselyOrdered β] {x : β}
(h₁ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ x ↔ ∀ y > x, ∃ᶠ a in f, u a ≤ y := le_limsup_iff' (β := βᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂
lemma liminf_le_limsup_of_frequently_le {v : α → β} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, u x ≤ v x)
(h₁ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ limsup v f := by
rcases f.eq_or_neBot with rfl | _
· exact (frequently_bot h).rec
have h₃ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := h₂.eventually_le
apply IsCoboundedUnder.of_frequently_le (a := a)
exact (h.and_eventually ha).mono fun x ⟨u_x, v_x⟩ ↦ u_x.trans v_x
have h₄ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) v := by
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := h₁.eventually_ge
apply IsCoboundedUnder.of_frequently_ge (a := a)
exact (ha.and_frequently h).mono fun x ⟨u_x, v_x⟩ ↦ u_x.trans v_x
refine (le_limsup_iff h₄ h₂).2 fun y y_v ↦ ?_
have := (le_liminf_iff h₃ h₁).1 (le_refl (liminf u f)) y y_v
exact (h.and_eventually this).mono fun x ⟨ux_vx, y_ux⟩ ↦ y_ux.trans_le ux_vx
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] {f : Filter α} {b : α}
-- The linter erroneously claims that I'm not referring to `c`
set_option linter.unusedVariables false in
theorem lt_mem_sets_of_limsSup_lt (h : f.IsBounded (· ≤ ·)) (l : f.limsSup < b) :
∀ᶠ a in f, a < b :=
let ⟨c, (h : ∀ᶠ a in f, a ≤ c), hcb⟩ := exists_lt_of_csInf_lt h l
mem_of_superset h fun _a => hcb.trans_le'
theorem gt_mem_sets_of_limsInf_gt : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) → b < f.limsInf → ∀ᶠ a in f, b < a :=
@lt_mem_sets_of_limsSup_lt αᵒᵈ _ _ _
section Classical
open Classical in
/-- Given an indexed family of sets `s j` over `j : Subtype p` and a function `f`, then
`liminf_reparam j` is equal to `j` if `f` is bounded below on `s j`, and otherwise to some
index `k` such that `f` is bounded below on `s k` (if there exists one).
To ensure good measurability behavior, this index `k` is chosen as the minimal suitable index.
This function is used to write down a liminf in a measurable way,
in `Filter.HasBasis.liminf_eq_ciSup_ciInf` and `Filter.HasBasis.liminf_eq_ite`. -/
noncomputable def liminf_reparam
(f : ι → α) (s : ι' → Set ι) (p : ι' → Prop) [Countable (Subtype p)] [Nonempty (Subtype p)]
(j : Subtype p) : Subtype p :=
let m : Set (Subtype p) := {j | BddBelow (range (fun (i : s j) ↦ f i))}
let g : ℕ → Subtype p := (exists_surjective_nat _).choose
have Z : ∃ n, g n ∈ m ∨ ∀ j, j ∉ m := by
by_cases H : ∃ j, j ∈ m
· rcases H with ⟨j, hj⟩
rcases (exists_surjective_nat (Subtype p)).choose_spec j with ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n, Or.inl hj⟩
· push_neg at H
exact ⟨0, Or.inr H⟩
if j ∈ m then j else g (Nat.find Z)
/-- Writing a liminf as a supremum of infimum, in a (possibly non-complete) conditionally complete
linear order. A reparametrization trick is needed to avoid taking the infimum of sets which are
not bounded below. -/
theorem HasBasis.liminf_eq_ciSup_ciInf {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} [Countable (Subtype p)] [Nonempty (Subtype p)]
(hv : v.HasBasis p s) {f : ι → α} (hs : ∀ (j : Subtype p), (s j).Nonempty)
(H : ∃ (j : Subtype p), BddBelow (range (fun (i : s j) ↦ f i))) :
liminf f v = ⨆ (j : Subtype p), ⨅ (i : s (liminf_reparam f s p j)), f i := by
classical
rcases H with ⟨j0, hj0⟩
let m : Set (Subtype p) := {j | BddBelow (range (fun (i : s j) ↦ f i))}
have : ∀ (j : Subtype p), Nonempty (s j) := fun j ↦ Nonempty.coe_sort (hs j)
have A : ⋃ (j : Subtype p), ⋂ (i : s j), Iic (f i) =
⋃ (j : Subtype p), ⋂ (i : s (liminf_reparam f s p j)), Iic (f i) := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· apply iUnion_subset (fun j ↦ ?_)
by_cases hj : j ∈ m
· have : j = liminf_reparam f s p j := by simp only [m, liminf_reparam, hj, ite_true]
conv_lhs => rw [this]
apply subset_iUnion _ j
· simp only [m, mem_setOf_eq, ← nonempty_iInter_Iic_iff, not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty] at hj
simp only [hj, empty_subset]
· apply iUnion_subset (fun j ↦ ?_)
exact subset_iUnion (fun (k : Subtype p) ↦ (⋂ (i : s k), Iic (f i))) (liminf_reparam f s p j)
have B : ∀ (j : Subtype p), ⋂ (i : s (liminf_reparam f s p j)), Iic (f i) =
Iic (⨅ (i : s (liminf_reparam f s p j)), f i) := by
intro j
apply (Iic_ciInf _).symm
change liminf_reparam f s p j ∈ m
by_cases Hj : j ∈ m
· simpa only [m, liminf_reparam, if_pos Hj] using Hj
· simp only [m, liminf_reparam, if_neg Hj]
have Z : ∃ n, (exists_surjective_nat (Subtype p)).choose n ∈ m ∨ ∀ j, j ∉ m := by
rcases (exists_surjective_nat (Subtype p)).choose_spec j0 with ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n, Or.inl hj0⟩
rcases Nat.find_spec Z with hZ|hZ
· exact hZ
· exact (hZ j0 hj0).elim
simp_rw [hv.liminf_eq_sSup_iUnion_iInter, A, B, sSup_iUnion_Iic]
open Classical in
/-- Writing a liminf as a supremum of infimum, in a (possibly non-complete) conditionally complete
linear order. A reparametrization trick is needed to avoid taking the infimum of sets which are
not bounded below. -/
theorem HasBasis.liminf_eq_ite {v : Filter ι} {p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι}
[Countable (Subtype p)] [Nonempty (Subtype p)] (hv : v.HasBasis p s) (f : ι → α) :
liminf f v = if ∃ (j : Subtype p), s j = ∅ then sSup univ else
if ∀ (j : Subtype p), ¬BddBelow (range (fun (i : s j) ↦ f i)) then sSup ∅
else ⨆ (j : Subtype p), ⨅ (i : s (liminf_reparam f s p j)), f i := by
by_cases H : ∃ (j : Subtype p), s j = ∅
· rw [if_pos H]
rcases H with ⟨j, hj⟩
simp [hv.liminf_eq_sSup_univ_of_empty j j.2 hj]
rw [if_neg H]
by_cases H' : ∀ (j : Subtype p), ¬BddBelow (range (fun (i : s j) ↦ f i))
· have A : ∀ (j : Subtype p), ⋂ (i : s j), Iic (f i) = ∅ := by
simp_rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_iInter_Iic_iff]
exact H'
simp_rw [if_pos H', hv.liminf_eq_sSup_iUnion_iInter, A, iUnion_empty]
rw [if_neg H']
apply hv.liminf_eq_ciSup_ciInf
· push_neg at H
simpa only [nonempty_iff_ne_empty] using H
· push_neg at H'
exact H'
/-- Given an indexed family of sets `s j` and a function `f`, then `limsup_reparam j` is equal
to `j` if `f` is bounded above on `s j`, and otherwise to some index `k` such that `f` is bounded
above on `s k` (if there exists one). To ensure good measurability behavior, this index `k` is
chosen as the minimal suitable index. This function is used to write down a limsup in a measurable
way, in `Filter.HasBasis.limsup_eq_ciInf_ciSup` and `Filter.HasBasis.limsup_eq_ite`. -/
noncomputable def limsup_reparam
(f : ι → α) (s : ι' → Set ι) (p : ι' → Prop) [Countable (Subtype p)] [Nonempty (Subtype p)]
(j : Subtype p) : Subtype p :=
liminf_reparam (α := αᵒᵈ) f s p j
/-- Writing a limsup as an infimum of supremum, in a (possibly non-complete) conditionally complete
linear order. A reparametrization trick is needed to avoid taking the supremum of sets which are
not bounded above. -/
theorem HasBasis.limsup_eq_ciInf_ciSup {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} [Countable (Subtype p)] [Nonempty (Subtype p)]
(hv : v.HasBasis p s) {f : ι → α} (hs : ∀ (j : Subtype p), (s j).Nonempty)
(H : ∃ (j : Subtype p), BddAbove (range (fun (i : s j) ↦ f i))) :
limsup f v = ⨅ (j : Subtype p), ⨆ (i : s (limsup_reparam f s p j)), f i :=
HasBasis.liminf_eq_ciSup_ciInf (α := αᵒᵈ) hv hs H
open Classical in
/-- Writing a limsup as an infimum of supremum, in a (possibly non-complete) conditionally complete
linear order. A reparametrization trick is needed to avoid taking the supremum of sets which are
not bounded below. -/
theorem HasBasis.limsup_eq_ite {v : Filter ι} {p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι}
[Countable (Subtype p)] [Nonempty (Subtype p)] (hv : v.HasBasis p s) (f : ι → α) :
limsup f v = if ∃ (j : Subtype p), s j = ∅ then sInf univ else
if ∀ (j : Subtype p), ¬BddAbove (range (fun (i : s j) ↦ f i)) then sInf ∅
else ⨅ (j : Subtype p), ⨆ (i : s (limsup_reparam f s p j)), f i :=
HasBasis.liminf_eq_ite (α := αᵒᵈ) hv f
end Classical
end ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder
end Filter
section Order
theorem GaloisConnection.l_limsup_le [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β]
[ConditionallyCompleteLattice γ] {f : Filter α} {v : α → β} {l : β → γ} {u : γ → β}
(gc : GaloisConnection l u)
(hlv : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) fun x => l (v x) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hv_co : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault) :
l (limsup v f) ≤ limsup (fun x => l (v x)) f := by
refine le_limsSup_of_le hlv fun c hc => ?_
rw [Filter.eventually_map] at hc
simp_rw [gc _ _] at hc ⊢
exact limsSup_le_of_le hv_co hc
theorem OrderIso.limsup_apply {γ} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] [ConditionallyCompleteLattice γ]
{f : Filter α} {u : α → β} (g : β ≃o γ)
(hu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hu_co : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hgu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) fun x => g (u x) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hgu_co : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) fun x => g (u x) := by isBoundedDefault) :
g (limsup u f) = limsup (fun x => g (u x)) f := by
refine le_antisymm ((OrderIso.to_galoisConnection g).l_limsup_le hgu hu_co) ?_
rw [← g.symm.symm_apply_apply <| limsup (fun x => g (u x)) f, g.symm_symm]
refine g.monotone ?_
have hf : u = fun i => g.symm (g (u i)) := funext fun i => (g.symm_apply_apply (u i)).symm
nth_rw 2 [hf]
refine (OrderIso.to_galoisConnection g.symm).l_limsup_le ?_ hgu_co
simp_rw [g.symm_apply_apply]
exact hu
theorem OrderIso.liminf_apply {γ} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] [ConditionallyCompleteLattice γ]
{f : Filter α} {u : α → β} (g : β ≃o γ)
(hu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hu_co : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hgu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) fun x => g (u x) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hgu_co : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) fun x => g (u x) := by isBoundedDefault) :
g (liminf u f) = liminf (fun x => g (u x)) f :=
OrderIso.limsup_apply (β := βᵒᵈ) (γ := γᵒᵈ) g.dual hu hu_co hgu hgu_co
end Order
section MinMax
open Filter
theorem limsup_max [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h₁ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₃ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₄ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsup (fun a ↦ max (u a) (v a)) f = max (limsup u f) (limsup v f) := by
have bddmax := IsBoundedUnder.sup h₃ h₄
have cobddmax := isCoboundedUnder_le_max (v := v) (Or.inl h₁)
apply le_antisymm
· refine (limsup_le_iff cobddmax bddmax).2 (fun b hb ↦ ?_)
have hu := eventually_lt_of_limsup_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt (le_max_left _ _) hb) h₃
have hv := eventually_lt_of_limsup_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt (le_max_right _ _) hb) h₄
refine mem_of_superset (inter_mem hu hv) (fun _ ↦ by simp)
· exact max_le (c := limsup (fun a ↦ max (u a) (v a)) f)
(limsup_le_limsup (Eventually.of_forall (fun a : α ↦ le_max_left (u a) (v a))) h₁ bddmax)
(limsup_le_limsup (Eventually.of_forall (fun a : α ↦ le_max_right (u a) (v a))) h₂ bddmax)
theorem liminf_min [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h₁ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₃ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₄ : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf (fun a ↦ min (u a) (v a)) f = min (liminf u f) (liminf v f) :=
limsup_max (β := βᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄
open Finset
theorem limsup_finset_sup' [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] {f : Filter α}
{F : ι → α → β} {s : Finset ι} (hs : s.Nonempty)
(h₁ : ∀ i ∈ s, f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) (F i) := by exact fun _ _ ↦ by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : ∀ i ∈ s, f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) (F i) := by exact fun _ _ ↦ by isBoundedDefault) :
limsup (fun a ↦ sup' s hs (fun i ↦ F i a)) f = sup' s hs (fun i ↦ limsup (F i) f) := by
have bddsup := isBoundedUnder_le_finset_sup' hs h₂
apply le_antisymm
· have h₃ : ∃ i ∈ s, f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) (F i) := by
rcases hs with ⟨i, i_s⟩
use i, i_s
exact h₁ i i_s
have cobddsup := isCoboundedUnder_le_finset_sup' hs h₃
refine (limsup_le_iff cobddsup bddsup).2 (fun b hb ↦ ?_)
rw [eventually_iff_exists_mem]
use ⋂ i ∈ s, {a | F i a < b}
split_ands
· rw [biInter_finset_mem]
suffices key : ∀ i ∈ s, ∀ᶠ a in f, F i a < b from fun i i_s ↦ eventually_iff.1 (key i i_s)
intro i i_s
apply eventually_lt_of_limsup_lt _ (h₂ i i_s)
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (Finset.le_sup' (f := fun i ↦ limsup (F i) f) i_s) hb
· simp only [mem_iInter, mem_setOf_eq, Finset.sup'_apply, sup'_lt_iff, imp_self, implies_true]
· apply Finset.sup'_le hs (fun i ↦ limsup (F i) f)
refine fun i i_s ↦ limsup_le_limsup (Eventually.of_forall (fun a ↦ ?_)) (h₁ i i_s) bddsup
simp only [Finset.sup'_apply, le_sup'_iff]
use i, i_s
theorem limsup_finset_sup [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] [OrderBot β] {f : Filter α}
{F : ι → α → β} {s : Finset ι}
(h₁ : ∀ i ∈ s, f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) (F i) := by exact fun _ _ ↦ by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : ∀ i ∈ s, f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) (F i) := by exact fun _ _ ↦ by isBoundedDefault) :
limsup (fun a ↦ sup s (fun i ↦ F i a)) f = sup s (fun i ↦ limsup (F i) f) := by
rcases eq_or_neBot f with (rfl | _)
· simp [limsup_eq, csInf_univ]
rcases Finset.eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | s_nemp)
· simp only [Finset.sup_apply, sup_empty, limsup_const]
rw [← Finset.sup'_eq_sup s_nemp fun i ↦ limsup (F i) f, ← limsup_finset_sup' s_nemp h₁ h₂]
congr
ext a
exact Eq.symm (Finset.sup'_eq_sup s_nemp (fun i ↦ F i a))
theorem liminf_finset_inf' [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] {f : Filter α}
{F : ι → α → β} {s : Finset ι} (hs : s.Nonempty)
(h₁ : ∀ i ∈ s, f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) (F i) := by exact fun _ _ ↦ by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : ∀ i ∈ s, f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) (F i) := by exact fun _ _ ↦ by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf (fun a ↦ inf' s hs (fun i ↦ F i a)) f = inf' s hs (fun i ↦ liminf (F i) f) :=
limsup_finset_sup' (β := βᵒᵈ) hs h₁ h₂
theorem liminf_finset_inf [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] [OrderTop β] {f : Filter α}
{F : ι → α → β} {s : Finset ι}
(h₁ : ∀ i ∈ s, f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) (F i) := by exact fun _ _ ↦ by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : ∀ i ∈ s, f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) (F i) := by exact fun _ _ ↦ by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf (fun a ↦ inf s (fun i ↦ F i a)) f = inf s (fun i ↦ liminf (F i) f) :=
limsup_finset_sup (β := βᵒᵈ) h₁ h₂
end MinMax
| Mathlib/Order/LiminfLimsup.lean | 1,207 | 1,214 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Data.SProd
/-!
# Sets in product and pi types
This file proves basic properties of product of sets in `α × β` and in `Π i, α i`, and of the
diagonal of a type.
## Main declarations
This file contains basic results on the following notions, which are defined in `Set.Operations`.
* `Set.prod`: Binary product of sets. For `s : Set α`, `t : Set β`, we have
`s.prod t : Set (α × β)`. Denoted by `s ×ˢ t`.
* `Set.diagonal`: Diagonal of a type. `Set.diagonal α = {(x, x) | x : α}`.
* `Set.offDiag`: Off-diagonal. `s ×ˢ s` without the diagonal.
* `Set.pi`: Arbitrary product of sets.
-/
open Function
namespace Set
/-! ### Cartesian binary product of sets -/
section Prod
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {t t₁ t₂ : Set β} {a : α} {b : β}
theorem Subsingleton.prod (hs : s.Subsingleton) (ht : t.Subsingleton) :
(s ×ˢ t).Subsingleton := fun _x hx _y hy ↦
Prod.ext (hs hx.1 hy.1) (ht hx.2 hy.2)
noncomputable instance decidableMemProd [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] :
DecidablePred (· ∈ s ×ˢ t) := fun x => inferInstanceAs (Decidable (x.1 ∈ s ∧ x.2 ∈ t))
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ t₂ :=
fun _ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨hs h₁, ht h₂⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_left (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ×ˢ t ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ t :=
prod_mono hs Subset.rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_right (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s ×ˢ t₁ ⊆ s ×ˢ t₂ :=
prod_mono Subset.rfl ht
@[simp]
theorem prod_self_subset_prod_self : s₁ ×ˢ s₁ ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
⟨fun h _ hx => (h (mk_mem_prod hx hx)).1, fun h _ hx => ⟨h hx.1, h hx.2⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem prod_self_ssubset_prod_self : s₁ ×ˢ s₁ ⊂ s₂ ×ˢ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ :=
and_congr prod_self_subset_prod_self <| not_congr prod_self_subset_prod_self
theorem prod_subset_iff {P : Set (α × β)} : s ×ˢ t ⊆ P ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ P :=
⟨fun h _ hx _ hy => h (mk_mem_prod hx hy), fun h ⟨_, _⟩ hp => h _ hp.1 _ hp.2⟩
theorem forall_prod_set {p : α × β → Prop} : (∀ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, p x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, p (x, y) :=
prod_subset_iff
theorem exists_prod_set {p : α × β → Prop} : (∃ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, p x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, p (x, y) := by
simp [and_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem prod_empty : s ×ˢ (∅ : Set β) = ∅ := by
ext
exact iff_of_eq (and_false _)
@[simp]
theorem empty_prod : (∅ : Set α) ×ˢ t = ∅ := by
ext
exact iff_of_eq (false_and _)
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem univ_prod_univ : @univ α ×ˢ @univ β = univ := by
ext
exact iff_of_eq (true_and _)
theorem univ_prod {t : Set β} : (univ : Set α) ×ˢ t = Prod.snd ⁻¹' t := by simp [prod_eq]
theorem prod_univ {s : Set α} : s ×ˢ (univ : Set β) = Prod.fst ⁻¹' s := by simp [prod_eq]
@[simp] lemma prod_eq_univ [Nonempty α] [Nonempty β] : s ×ˢ t = univ ↔ s = univ ∧ t = univ := by
simp [eq_univ_iff_forall, forall_and]
theorem singleton_prod : ({a} : Set α) ×ˢ t = Prod.mk a '' t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm, eq_comm]
theorem prod_singleton : s ×ˢ ({b} : Set β) = (fun a => (a, b)) '' s := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem singleton_prod_singleton : ({a} : Set α) ×ˢ ({b} : Set β) = {(a, b)} := by ext ⟨c, d⟩; simp
@[simp]
theorem union_prod : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t ∪ s₂ ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [or_and_right]
@[simp]
theorem prod_union : s ×ˢ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s ×ˢ t₁ ∪ s ×ˢ t₂ := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_or_left]
theorem inter_prod : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t ∩ s₂ ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [← and_and_right, mem_inter_iff, mem_prod]
theorem prod_inter : s ×ˢ (t₁ ∩ t₂) = s ×ˢ t₁ ∩ s ×ˢ t₂ := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [← and_and_left, mem_inter_iff, mem_prod]
@[mfld_simps]
theorem prod_inter_prod : s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ∩ s₂ ×ˢ t₂ = (s₁ ∩ s₂) ×ˢ (t₁ ∩ t₂) := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_assoc, and_left_comm]
lemma compl_prod_eq_union {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
(s ×ˢ t)ᶜ = (sᶜ ×ˢ univ) ∪ (univ ×ˢ tᶜ) := by
ext p
simp only [mem_compl_iff, mem_prod, not_and, mem_union, mem_univ, and_true, true_and]
constructor <;> intro h
· by_cases fst_in_s : p.fst ∈ s
· exact Or.inr (h fst_in_s)
· exact Or.inl fst_in_s
· intro fst_in_s
simpa only [fst_in_s, not_true, false_or] using h
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_prod : Disjoint (s₁ ×ˢ t₁) (s₂ ×ˢ t₂) ↔ Disjoint s₁ s₂ ∨ Disjoint t₁ t₂ := by
simp_rw [disjoint_left, mem_prod, not_and_or, Prod.forall, and_imp, ← @forall_or_right α, ←
@forall_or_left β, ← @forall_or_right (_ ∈ s₁), ← @forall_or_left (_ ∈ t₁)]
theorem Disjoint.set_prod_left (hs : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (t₁ t₂ : Set β) :
Disjoint (s₁ ×ˢ t₁) (s₂ ×ˢ t₂) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun ⟨_a, _b⟩ ⟨ha₁, _⟩ ⟨ha₂, _⟩ => disjoint_left.1 hs ha₁ ha₂
theorem Disjoint.set_prod_right (ht : Disjoint t₁ t₂) (s₁ s₂ : Set α) :
Disjoint (s₁ ×ˢ t₁) (s₂ ×ˢ t₂) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun ⟨_a, _b⟩ ⟨_, hb₁⟩ ⟨_, hb₂⟩ => disjoint_left.1 ht hb₁ hb₂
theorem prodMap_image_prod (f : α → β) (g : γ → δ) (s : Set α) (t : Set γ) :
(Prod.map f g) '' (s ×ˢ t) = (f '' s) ×ˢ (g '' t) := by
ext
aesop
theorem insert_prod : insert a s ×ˢ t = Prod.mk a '' t ∪ s ×ˢ t := by
simp only [insert_eq, union_prod, singleton_prod]
theorem prod_insert : s ×ˢ insert b t = (fun a => (a, b)) '' s ∪ s ×ˢ t := by
simp only [insert_eq, prod_union, prod_singleton]
theorem prod_preimage_eq {f : γ → α} {g : δ → β} :
(f ⁻¹' s) ×ˢ (g ⁻¹' t) = (fun p : γ × δ => (f p.1, g p.2)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t :=
rfl
theorem prod_preimage_left {f : γ → α} :
(f ⁻¹' s) ×ˢ t = (fun p : γ × β => (f p.1, p.2)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t :=
rfl
theorem prod_preimage_right {g : δ → β} :
s ×ˢ (g ⁻¹' t) = (fun p : α × δ => (p.1, g p.2)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t :=
rfl
theorem preimage_prod_map_prod (f : α → β) (g : γ → δ) (s : Set β) (t : Set δ) :
Prod.map f g ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = (f ⁻¹' s) ×ˢ (g ⁻¹' t) :=
rfl
theorem mk_preimage_prod (f : γ → α) (g : γ → β) :
(fun x => (f x, g x)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = f ⁻¹' s ∩ g ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left (hb : b ∈ t) : (fun a => (a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = s := by
ext a
simp [hb]
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right (ha : a ∈ s) : Prod.mk a ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = t := by
ext b
simp [ha]
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_empty (hb : b ∉ t) : (fun a => (a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = ∅ := by
ext a
simp [hb]
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_empty (ha : a ∉ s) : Prod.mk a ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = ∅ := by
ext b
simp [ha]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_if [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] :
(fun a => (a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = if b ∈ t then s else ∅ := by split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_if [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] :
Prod.mk a ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = if a ∈ s then t else ∅ := by split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left_fn_eq_if [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] (f : γ → α) :
(fun a => (f a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = if b ∈ t then f ⁻¹' s else ∅ := by
rw [← mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_if, prod_preimage_left, preimage_preimage]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right_fn_eq_if [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (g : δ → β) :
(fun b => (a, g b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = if a ∈ s then g ⁻¹' t else ∅ := by
rw [← mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_if, prod_preimage_right, preimage_preimage]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_swap_prod (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : Prod.swap ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = t ×ˢ s := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem image_swap_prod (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : Prod.swap '' s ×ˢ t = t ×ˢ s := by
rw [image_swap_eq_preimage_swap, preimage_swap_prod]
theorem mapsTo_swap_prod (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : MapsTo Prod.swap (s ×ˢ t) (t ×ˢ s) :=
fun _ ⟨hx, hy⟩ ↦ ⟨hy, hx⟩
theorem prod_image_image_eq {m₁ : α → γ} {m₂ : β → δ} :
(m₁ '' s) ×ˢ (m₂ '' t) = (fun p : α × β => (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) '' s ×ˢ t :=
ext <| by
simp [-exists_and_right, exists_and_right.symm, and_left_comm, and_assoc, and_comm]
theorem prod_range_range_eq {m₁ : α → γ} {m₂ : β → δ} :
range m₁ ×ˢ range m₂ = range fun p : α × β => (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2) :=
ext <| by simp [range]
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem range_prodMap {m₁ : α → γ} {m₂ : β → δ} : range (Prod.map m₁ m₂) = range m₁ ×ˢ range m₂ :=
prod_range_range_eq.symm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-10")] alias range_prod_map := range_prodMap
theorem prod_range_univ_eq {m₁ : α → γ} :
range m₁ ×ˢ (univ : Set β) = range fun p : α × β => (m₁ p.1, p.2) :=
ext <| by simp [range]
theorem prod_univ_range_eq {m₂ : β → δ} :
(univ : Set α) ×ˢ range m₂ = range fun p : α × β => (p.1, m₂ p.2) :=
ext <| by simp [range]
theorem range_pair_subset (f : α → β) (g : α → γ) :
(range fun x => (f x, g x)) ⊆ range f ×ˢ range g := by
| have : (fun x => (f x, g x)) = Prod.map f g ∘ fun x => (x, x) := funext fun x => rfl
rw [this, ← range_prodMap]
apply range_comp_subset_range
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Prod.lean | 256 | 258 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Charpoly.Coeff
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Minpoly.Field
/-!
# Characteristic polynomial
We define the characteristic polynomial of `f : M →ₗ[R] M`, where `M` is a finite and
free `R`-module. The proof that `f.charpoly` is the characteristic polynomial of the matrix of `f`
in any basis is in `LinearAlgebra/Charpoly/ToMatrix`.
## Main definition
* `LinearMap.charpoly f` : the characteristic polynomial of `f : M →ₗ[R] M`.
-/
universe u v w
variable {R : Type u} {M : Type v} [CommRing R]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [Module.Free R M] [Module.Finite R M] (f : M →ₗ[R] M)
open Matrix Polynomial
noncomputable section
open Module.Free Polynomial Matrix
namespace LinearMap
section Basic
/-- The characteristic polynomial of `f : M →ₗ[R] M`. -/
def charpoly : R[X] :=
(toMatrix (chooseBasis R M) (chooseBasis R M) f).charpoly
theorem charpoly_def : f.charpoly = (toMatrix (chooseBasis R M) (chooseBasis R M) f).charpoly :=
rfl
end Basic
section Coeff
theorem charpoly_monic : f.charpoly.Monic :=
Matrix.charpoly_monic _
open Module in
lemma charpoly_natDegree [Nontrivial R] [StrongRankCondition R] :
natDegree (charpoly f) = finrank R M := by
rw [charpoly, Matrix.charpoly_natDegree_eq_dim, finrank_eq_card_chooseBasisIndex]
end Coeff
section CayleyHamilton
/-- The **Cayley-Hamilton Theorem**, that the characteristic polynomial of a linear map, applied
to the linear map itself, is zero.
See `Matrix.aeval_self_charpoly` for the equivalent statement about matrices. -/
theorem aeval_self_charpoly : aeval f f.charpoly = 0 := by
apply (LinearEquiv.map_eq_zero_iff (algEquivMatrix (chooseBasis R M)).toLinearEquiv).1
rw [AlgEquiv.toLinearEquiv_apply, ← AlgEquiv.coe_algHom, ← Polynomial.aeval_algHom_apply _ _ _,
charpoly_def]
| exact Matrix.aeval_self_charpoly _
theorem isIntegral : IsIntegral R f :=
⟨f.charpoly, ⟨charpoly_monic f, aeval_self_charpoly f⟩⟩
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Charpoly/Basic.lean | 71 | 75 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Products.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.Currying
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Products.Bifunctor
/-!
# A Fubini theorem for categorical (co)limits
We prove that $lim_{J × K} G = lim_J (lim_K G(j, -))$ for a functor `G : J × K ⥤ C`,
when all the appropriate limits exist.
We begin working with a functor `F : J ⥤ K ⥤ C`. We'll write `G : J × K ⥤ C` for the associated
"uncurried" functor.
In the first part, given a coherent family `D` of limit cones over the functors `F.obj j`,
and a cone `c` over `G`, we construct a cone over the cone points of `D`.
We then show that if `c` is a limit cone, the constructed cone is also a limit cone.
In the second part, we state the Fubini theorem in the setting where limits are
provided by suitable `HasLimit` classes.
We construct
`limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim F : limit (uncurry.obj F) ≅ limit (F ⋙ lim)`
and give simp lemmas characterising it.
For convenience, we also provide
`limitIsoLimitCurryCompLim G : limit G ≅ limit ((curry.obj G) ⋙ lim)`
in terms of the uncurried functor.
All statements have their counterpart for colimits.
-/
open CategoryTheory
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {J K : Type*} [Category J] [Category K]
variable {C : Type*} [Category C]
variable (F : J ⥤ K ⥤ C) (G : J × K ⥤ C)
-- We could try introducing a "dependent functor type" to handle this?
/-- A structure carrying a diagram of cones over the functors `F.obj j`.
-/
structure DiagramOfCones where
/-- For each object, a cone. -/
obj : ∀ j : J, Cone (F.obj j)
/-- For each map, a map of cones. -/
map : ∀ {j j' : J} (f : j ⟶ j'), (Cones.postcompose (F.map f)).obj (obj j) ⟶ obj j'
id : ∀ j : J, (map (𝟙 j)).hom = 𝟙 _ := by aesop_cat
comp : ∀ {j₁ j₂ j₃ : J} (f : j₁ ⟶ j₂) (g : j₂ ⟶ j₃),
(map (f ≫ g)).hom = (map f).hom ≫ (map g).hom := by aesop_cat
/-- A structure carrying a diagram of cocones over the functors `F.obj j`.
-/
structure DiagramOfCocones where
/-- For each object, a cocone. -/
obj : ∀ j : J, Cocone (F.obj j)
/-- For each map, a map of cocones. -/
map : ∀ {j j' : J} (f : j ⟶ j'), (obj j) ⟶ (Cocones.precompose (F.map f)).obj (obj j')
id : ∀ j : J, (map (𝟙 j)).hom = 𝟙 _ := by aesop_cat
comp : ∀ {j₁ j₂ j₃ : J} (f : j₁ ⟶ j₂) (g : j₂ ⟶ j₃),
(map (f ≫ g)).hom = (map f).hom ≫ (map g).hom := by aesop_cat
variable {F}
/-- Extract the functor `J ⥤ C` consisting of the cone points and the maps between them,
from a `DiagramOfCones`.
-/
@[simps]
def DiagramOfCones.conePoints (D : DiagramOfCones F) : J ⥤ C where
obj j := (D.obj j).pt
map f := (D.map f).hom
map_id j := D.id j
map_comp f g := D.comp f g
/-- Extract the functor `J ⥤ C` consisting of the cocone points and the maps between them,
from a `DiagramOfCocones`.
-/
@[simps]
def DiagramOfCocones.coconePoints (D : DiagramOfCocones F) : J ⥤ C where
obj j := (D.obj j).pt
map f := (D.map f).hom
map_id j := D.id j
map_comp f g := D.comp f g
/-- Given a diagram `D` of limit cones over the `F.obj j`, and a cone over `uncurry.obj F`,
we can construct a cone over the diagram consisting of the cone points from `D`.
-/
@[simps]
def coneOfConeUncurry {D : DiagramOfCones F} (Q : ∀ j, IsLimit (D.obj j))
(c : Cone (uncurry.obj F)) : Cone D.conePoints where
pt := c.pt
π :=
{ app := fun j =>
(Q j).lift
{ pt := c.pt
π :=
{ app := fun k => c.π.app (j, k)
naturality := fun k k' f => by
dsimp; simp only [Category.id_comp]
have := @NatTrans.naturality _ _ _ _ _ _ c.π (j, k) (j, k') (𝟙 j, f)
dsimp at this
simp? at this says
simp only [Category.id_comp, Functor.map_id, NatTrans.id_app] at this
exact this } }
naturality := fun j j' f =>
(Q j').hom_ext
(by
dsimp
intro k
simp only [Limits.ConeMorphism.w, Limits.Cones.postcompose_obj_π,
Limits.IsLimit.fac_assoc, Limits.IsLimit.fac, NatTrans.comp_app, Category.id_comp,
Category.assoc]
have := @NatTrans.naturality _ _ _ _ _ _ c.π (j, k) (j', k) (f, 𝟙 k)
dsimp at this
simp only [Category.id_comp, Category.comp_id, CategoryTheory.Functor.map_id,
NatTrans.id_app] at this
exact this) }
/-- Given a diagram `D` of limit cones over the `curry.obj G j`, and a cone over `G`,
we can construct a cone over the diagram consisting of the cone points from `D`.
-/
@[simps]
def coneOfConeCurry {D : DiagramOfCones (curry.obj G)} (Q : ∀ j, IsLimit (D.obj j))
(c : Cone G) : Cone D.conePoints where
pt := c.pt
π :=
{ app j := (Q j).lift
{ pt := c.pt
π := { app k := c.π.app (j, k) } }
naturality {_ j'} _ := (Q j').hom_ext (by simp) }
/-- Given a diagram `D` of colimit cocones over the `F.obj j`, and a cocone over `uncurry.obj F`,
we can construct a cocone over the diagram consisting of the cocone points from `D`.
-/
@[simps]
def coconeOfCoconeUncurry {D : DiagramOfCocones F} (Q : ∀ j, IsColimit (D.obj j))
(c : Cocone (uncurry.obj F)) : Cocone D.coconePoints where
pt := c.pt
ι :=
{ app := fun j =>
(Q j).desc
{ pt := c.pt
ι :=
{ app := fun k => c.ι.app (j, k)
naturality := fun k k' f => by
dsimp; simp only [Category.comp_id]
conv_lhs =>
arg 1; equals (F.map (𝟙 _)).app _ ≫ (F.obj j).map f =>
simp
conv_lhs => arg 1; rw [← uncurry_obj_map F ((𝟙 j,f) : (j,k) ⟶ (j,k'))]
rw [c.w] } }
naturality := fun j j' f =>
(Q j).hom_ext
(by
dsimp
intro k
simp only [Limits.CoconeMorphism.w_assoc, Limits.Cocones.precompose_obj_ι,
Limits.IsColimit.fac_assoc, Limits.IsColimit.fac, NatTrans.comp_app, Category.comp_id,
Category.assoc]
have := @NatTrans.naturality _ _ _ _ _ _ c.ι (j, k) (j', k) (f, 𝟙 k)
dsimp at this
simp only [Category.id_comp, Category.comp_id, CategoryTheory.Functor.map_id,
NatTrans.id_app] at this
exact this) }
/-- Given a diagram `D` of colimit cocones under the `curry.obj G j`, and a cocone under `G`,
we can construct a cocone under the diagram consisting of the cocone points from `D`.
-/
@[simps]
def coconeOfCoconeCurry {D : DiagramOfCocones (curry.obj G)} (Q : ∀ j, IsColimit (D.obj j))
(c : Cocone G) : Cocone D.coconePoints where
pt := c.pt
ι :=
{ app j := (Q j).desc
{ pt := c.pt
ι := { app k := c.ι.app (j, k) } }
naturality {j _} _ := (Q j).hom_ext (by simp) }
/-- `coneOfConeUncurry Q c` is a limit cone when `c` is a limit cone.
-/
def coneOfConeUncurryIsLimit {D : DiagramOfCones F} (Q : ∀ j, IsLimit (D.obj j))
{c : Cone (uncurry.obj F)} (P : IsLimit c) : IsLimit (coneOfConeUncurry Q c) where
lift s :=
P.lift
{ pt := s.pt
π :=
{ app := fun p => s.π.app p.1 ≫ (D.obj p.1).π.app p.2
naturality := fun p p' f => by
dsimp; simp only [Category.id_comp, Category.assoc]
rcases p with ⟨j, k⟩
rcases p' with ⟨j', k'⟩
rcases f with ⟨fj, fk⟩
dsimp
slice_rhs 3 4 => rw [← NatTrans.naturality]
slice_rhs 2 3 => rw [← (D.obj j).π.naturality]
simp only [Functor.const_obj_map, Category.id_comp, Category.assoc]
have w := (D.map fj).w k'
dsimp at w
rw [← w]
have n := s.π.naturality fj
dsimp at n
simp only [Category.id_comp] at n
rw [n]
simp } }
fac s j := by
apply (Q j).hom_ext
intro k
simp
uniq s m w := by
refine P.uniq
{ pt := s.pt
π := _ } m ?_
rintro ⟨j, k⟩
dsimp
rw [← w j]
simp
/-- If `coneOfConeUncurry Q c` is a limit cone then `c` is in fact a limit cone.
-/
def IsLimit.ofConeOfConeUncurry {D : DiagramOfCones F} (Q : ∀ j, IsLimit (D.obj j))
{c : Cone (uncurry.obj F)} (P : IsLimit (coneOfConeUncurry Q c)) : IsLimit c :=
-- These constructions are used in various fields of the proof so we abstract them here.
letI E (j : J) : Prod.sectR j K ⋙ uncurry.obj F ≅ F.obj j :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun _ ↦ Iso.refl _)
letI S (s : Cone (uncurry.obj F)) : Cone D.conePoints :=
{ pt := s.pt
π :=
{ app j := (Q j).lift <|
(Cones.postcompose (E j).hom).obj <| s.whisker (Prod.sectR j K)
naturality {j' j} f := (Q j).hom_ext <|
fun k ↦ by simpa [E] using s.π.naturality ((Prod.sectL J k).map f) } }
{ lift s := P.lift (S s)
fac s p := by
have h1 := (Q p.1).fac ((Cones.postcompose (E p.1).hom).obj <|
s.whisker (Prod.sectR p.1 K)) p.2
simp only [Functor.comp_obj, Prod.sectR_obj, uncurry_obj_obj, NatTrans.id_app,
Cones.postcompose_obj_pt, Cone.whisker_pt, Cones.postcompose_obj_π,
Cone.whisker_π, NatTrans.comp_app, Functor.const_obj_obj, whiskerLeft_app,
NatIso.ofComponents_hom_app, Iso.refl_hom, Category.comp_id, E] at h1
have h2 := (P.fac (S s) p.1)
dsimp only [Functor.comp_obj, Prod.sectR_obj, uncurry_obj_obj, NatTrans.id_app,
Functor.const_obj_obj, DiagramOfCones.conePoints_obj, DiagramOfCones.conePoints_map,
Functor.const_obj_map, id_eq, Cones.postcompose_obj_pt, Cone.whisker_pt,
Cones.postcompose_obj_π, Cone.whisker_π, NatTrans.comp_app, whiskerLeft_app,
NatIso.ofComponents_hom_app, Iso.refl_hom, Prod.sectL_obj, Prod.sectL_map, eq_mp_eq_cast,
eq_mpr_eq_cast, coneOfConeUncurry_pt, coneOfConeUncurry_π_app, S, E] at h2 ⊢
simp [← h1, ← h2]
uniq s f hf := P.uniq (s := S s) _ <|
fun j ↦ (Q j).hom_ext <| fun k ↦ by simpa [S, E] using hf (j, k) }
/-- `coconeOfCoconeUncurry Q c` is a colimit cocone when `c` is a colimit cocone.
-/
def coconeOfCoconeUncurryIsColimit {D : DiagramOfCocones F} (Q : ∀ j, IsColimit (D.obj j))
{c : Cocone (uncurry.obj F)} (P : IsColimit c) : IsColimit (coconeOfCoconeUncurry Q c) where
desc s :=
P.desc
{ pt := s.pt
ι :=
{ app := fun p => (D.obj p.1).ι.app p.2 ≫ s.ι.app p.1
naturality := fun p p' f => by
dsimp; simp only [Category.id_comp, Category.assoc]
rcases p with ⟨j, k⟩
rcases p' with ⟨j', k'⟩
rcases f with ⟨fj, fk⟩
dsimp
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [(D.obj j').ι.naturality]
simp only [Functor.const_obj_map, Category.id_comp, Category.assoc]
have w := (D.map fj).w k
dsimp at w
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [← w]
have n := s.ι.naturality fj
dsimp at n
simp only [Category.comp_id] at n
rw [← n]
simp } }
fac s j := by
apply (Q j).hom_ext
intro k
simp
uniq s m w := by
refine P.uniq
{ pt := s.pt
ι := _ } m ?_
rintro ⟨j, k⟩
dsimp
rw [← w j]
simp
/-- If `coconeOfCoconeUncurry Q c` is a colimit cocone then `c` is in fact a colimit
cocone. -/
def IsColimit.ofCoconeUncurry {D : DiagramOfCocones F}
(Q : ∀ j, IsColimit (D.obj j)) {c : Cocone (uncurry.obj F)}
(P : IsColimit (coconeOfCoconeUncurry Q c)) : IsColimit c :=
-- These constructions are used in various fields of the proof so we abstract them here.
letI E (j : J) : (Prod.sectR j K ⋙ uncurry.obj F ≅ F.obj j) :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun _ ↦ Iso.refl _)
letI S (s : Cocone (uncurry.obj F)) : Cocone D.coconePoints :=
{ pt := s.pt
ι :=
{ app j := (Q j).desc <|
(Cocones.precompose (E j).inv).obj <| s.whisker (Prod.sectR j K)
naturality {j j'} f := (Q j).hom_ext <|
fun k ↦ by simpa [E] using s.ι.naturality ((Prod.sectL J k).map f) } }
{ desc s := P.desc (S s)
fac s p := by
have h1 := (Q p.1).fac ((Cocones.precompose (E p.1).inv).obj <|
s.whisker (Prod.sectR p.1 K)) p.2
simp only [Functor.comp_obj, Prod.sectR_obj, uncurry_obj_obj, NatTrans.id_app,
Cocones.precompose_obj_pt, Cocone.whisker_pt, Functor.const_obj_obj,
Cocones.precompose_obj_ι, Cocone.whisker_ι, NatTrans.comp_app, NatIso.ofComponents_inv_app,
Iso.refl_inv, whiskerLeft_app, Category.id_comp, E] at h1
have h2 := (P.fac (S s) p.1)
dsimp only [DiagramOfCocones.coconePoints_obj, Functor.comp_obj, Prod.sectR_obj,
uncurry_obj_obj, NatTrans.id_app, Functor.const_obj_obj, DiagramOfCocones.coconePoints_map,
Functor.const_obj_map, id_eq, Cocones.precompose_obj_pt, Cocone.whisker_pt,
Cocones.precompose_obj_ι, Cocone.whisker_ι, NatTrans.comp_app, NatIso.ofComponents_inv_app,
Iso.refl_inv, whiskerLeft_app, Prod.sectL_obj, Prod.sectL_map, eq_mp_eq_cast,
eq_mpr_eq_cast, coconeOfCoconeUncurry_pt, coconeOfCoconeUncurry_ι_app, S, E] at h2 ⊢
simp [← h1, ← h2]
uniq s f hf := P.uniq (s := S s) _ <|
fun j ↦ (Q j).hom_ext <| fun k ↦ by simpa [S, E] using hf (j, k) }
section
variable (F)
variable [HasLimitsOfShape K C]
/-- Given a functor `F : J ⥤ K ⥤ C`, with all needed limits,
we can construct a diagram consisting of the limit cone over each functor `F.obj j`,
and the universal cone morphisms between these.
-/
@[simps]
noncomputable def DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits : DiagramOfCones F where
obj j := limit.cone (F.obj j)
map f := { hom := lim.map (F.map f) }
-- Satisfying the inhabited linter.
noncomputable instance diagramOfConesInhabited : Inhabited (DiagramOfCones F) :=
⟨DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits F⟩
@[simp]
theorem DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits_conePoints :
(DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits F).conePoints = F ⋙ lim :=
rfl
section
variable [HasLimit (curry.obj G ⋙ lim)]
/-- Given a functor `G : J × K ⥤ C` such that `(curry.obj G ⋙ lim)` makes sense and has a limit,
we can construct a cone over `G` with `limit (curry.obj G ⋙ lim)` as a cone point -/
noncomputable def coneOfHasLimitCurryCompLim : Cone G :=
let Q : DiagramOfCones (curry.obj G) := .mkOfHasLimits _
{ pt := limit (curry.obj G ⋙ lim),
π :=
{ app x := limit.π (curry.obj G ⋙ lim) x.fst ≫ (Q.obj x.fst).π.app x.snd
naturality {x y} := fun ⟨f₁, f₂⟩ ↦ by
have := (Q.obj x.1).w f₂
dsimp [Q] at this ⊢
rw [← limit.w (F := curry.obj G ⋙ lim) (f := f₁)]
dsimp
simp only [Category.assoc, Category.id_comp, Prod.fac (f₁, f₂),
G.map_comp, limMap_π, curry_obj_map_app, reassoc_of% this] } }
/-- The cone `coneOfHasLimitCurryCompLim` is in fact a limit cone.
-/
noncomputable def isLimitConeOfHasLimitCurryCompLim : IsLimit (coneOfHasLimitCurryCompLim G) :=
let Q : DiagramOfCones (curry.obj G) := .mkOfHasLimits _
let Q' : ∀ j, IsLimit (Q.obj j) := fun j => limit.isLimit _
{ lift c' := limit.lift (F := curry.obj G ⋙ lim) (coneOfConeCurry G Q' c')
fac c' f := by simp [coneOfHasLimitCurryCompLim, Q, Q']
uniq c' f h := by
dsimp [coneOfHasLimitCurryCompLim] at f h ⊢
refine limit.hom_ext (F := curry.obj G ⋙ lim) (fun j ↦ limit.hom_ext (fun k ↦ ?_))
simp [h ⟨j, k⟩, Q'] }
/-- The functor `G` has a limit if `C` has `K`-shaped limits and `(curry.obj G ⋙ lim)` has a limit.
-/
instance : HasLimit G where
exists_limit :=
⟨ { cone := coneOfHasLimitCurryCompLim G
isLimit := isLimitConeOfHasLimitCurryCompLim G }⟩
end
variable [HasLimit (uncurry.obj F)] [HasLimit (F ⋙ lim)]
/-- The Fubini theorem for a functor `F : J ⥤ K ⥤ C`,
showing that the limit of `uncurry.obj F` can be computed as
the limit of the limits of the functors `F.obj j`.
-/
noncomputable def limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim : limit (uncurry.obj F) ≅ limit (F ⋙ lim) := by
let c := limit.cone (uncurry.obj F)
let P : IsLimit c := limit.isLimit _
let G := DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits F
let Q : ∀ j, IsLimit (G.obj j) := fun j => limit.isLimit _
have Q' := coneOfConeUncurryIsLimit Q P
have Q'' := limit.isLimit (F ⋙ lim)
exact IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso Q' Q''
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim_hom_π_π {j} {k} :
(limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim F).hom ≫ limit.π _ j ≫ limit.π _ k = limit.π _ (j, k) := by
dsimp [limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim, IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso, IsLimit.uniqueUpToIso]
simp
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim_inv_π {j} {k} :
(limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim F).inv ≫ limit.π _ (j, k) =
(limit.π _ j ≫ limit.π _ k) := by
rw [← cancel_epi (limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim F).hom]
simp
end
section
variable (F)
variable [HasColimitsOfShape K C]
/-- Given a functor `F : J ⥤ K ⥤ C`, with all needed colimits,
we can construct a diagram consisting of the colimit cocone over each functor `F.obj j`,
and the universal cocone morphisms between these.
-/
@[simps]
noncomputable def DiagramOfCocones.mkOfHasColimits : DiagramOfCocones F where
obj j := colimit.cocone (F.obj j)
map f := { hom := colim.map (F.map f) }
-- Satisfying the inhabited linter.
noncomputable instance diagramOfCoconesInhabited : Inhabited (DiagramOfCocones F) :=
⟨DiagramOfCocones.mkOfHasColimits F⟩
@[simp]
theorem DiagramOfCocones.mkOfHasColimits_coconePoints :
(DiagramOfCocones.mkOfHasColimits F).coconePoints = F ⋙ colim :=
rfl
section
variable [HasColimit (curry.obj G ⋙ colim)]
/-- Given a functor `G : J × K ⥤ C` such that `(curry.obj G ⋙ colim)` makes sense and has a colimit,
we can construct a cocone under `G` with `colimit (curry.obj G ⋙ colim)` as a cocone point -/
noncomputable def coconeOfHasColimitCurryCompColim : Cocone G :=
let Q : DiagramOfCocones (curry.obj G) := .mkOfHasColimits _
{ pt := colimit (curry.obj G ⋙ colim),
ι :=
{ app x := (Q.obj x.fst).ι.app x.snd ≫ colimit.ι (curry.obj G ⋙ colim) x.fst
naturality {x y} := fun ⟨f₁, f₂⟩ ↦ by
have := (Q.obj y.1).w f₂
dsimp [Q] at this ⊢
rw [← colimit.w (F := curry.obj G ⋙ colim) (f := f₁)]
dsimp
simp [Category.assoc, Category.comp_id, Prod.fac' (f₁, f₂),
G.map_comp, ι_colimMap_assoc, curry_obj_map_app, reassoc_of% this] } }
/-- The cocone `coconeOfHasColimitCurryCompColim` is in fact a limit cocone.
-/
noncomputable def isColimitCoconeOfHasColimitCurryCompColim :
IsColimit (coconeOfHasColimitCurryCompColim G) :=
let Q : DiagramOfCocones (curry.obj G) := .mkOfHasColimits _
let Q' : ∀ j, IsColimit (Q.obj j) := fun j => colimit.isColimit _
{ desc c' := colimit.desc (F := curry.obj G ⋙ colim) (coconeOfCoconeCurry G Q' c')
fac c' f := by simp [coconeOfHasColimitCurryCompColim, Q, Q']
uniq c' f h := by
dsimp [coconeOfHasColimitCurryCompColim] at f h ⊢
refine colimit.hom_ext (F := curry.obj G ⋙ colim) (fun j ↦ colimit.hom_ext (fun k ↦ ?_))
simp [← h ⟨j, k⟩, Q'] }
/-- The functor `G` has a colimit if `C` has `K`-shaped colimits and `(curry.obj G ⋙ colim)` has a
colimit. -/
instance : HasColimit G where
exists_colimit :=
⟨ { cocone := coconeOfHasColimitCurryCompColim G
isColimit := isColimitCoconeOfHasColimitCurryCompColim G }⟩
end
variable [HasColimit (uncurry.obj F)] [HasColimit (F ⋙ colim)]
/-- The Fubini theorem for a functor `F : J ⥤ K ⥤ C`,
showing that the colimit of `uncurry.obj F` can be computed as
the colimit of the colimits of the functors `F.obj j`.
-/
noncomputable def colimitUncurryIsoColimitCompColim :
colimit (uncurry.obj F) ≅ colimit (F ⋙ colim) := by
let c := colimit.cocone (uncurry.obj F)
let P : IsColimit c := colimit.isColimit _
| let G := DiagramOfCocones.mkOfHasColimits F
let Q : ∀ j, IsColimit (G.obj j) := fun j => colimit.isColimit _
have Q' := coconeOfCoconeUncurryIsColimit Q P
have Q'' := colimit.isColimit (F ⋙ colim)
exact IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso Q' Q''
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Fubini.lean | 497 | 501 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta, Edward Ayers
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Pullback.HasPullback
import Mathlib.Data.Set.BooleanAlgebra
/-!
# Theory of sieves
- For an object `X` of a category `C`, a `Sieve X` is a set of morphisms to `X`
which is closed under left-composition.
- The complete lattice structure on sieves is given, as well as the Galois insertion
given by downward-closing.
- A `Sieve X` (functorially) induces a presheaf on `C` together with a monomorphism to
the yoneda embedding of `X`.
## Tags
sieve, pullback
-/
universe v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D] (F : C ⥤ D)
variable {X Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ X)
/-- A set of arrows all with codomain `X`. -/
def Presieve (X : C) :=
∀ ⦃Y⦄, Set (Y ⟶ X)-- deriving CompleteLattice
instance : CompleteLattice (Presieve X) := by
dsimp [Presieve]
infer_instance
namespace Presieve
noncomputable instance : Inhabited (Presieve X) :=
⟨⊤⟩
/-- The full subcategory of the over category `C/X` consisting of arrows which belong to a
presieve on `X`. -/
abbrev category {X : C} (P : Presieve X) :=
ObjectProperty.FullSubcategory fun f : Over X => P f.hom
/-- Construct an object of `P.category`. -/
abbrev categoryMk {X : C} (P : Presieve X) {Y : C} (f : Y ⟶ X) (hf : P f) : P.category :=
⟨Over.mk f, hf⟩
/-- Given a sieve `S` on `X : C`, its associated diagram `S.diagram` is defined to be
the natural functor from the full subcategory of the over category `C/X` consisting
of arrows in `S` to `C`. -/
abbrev diagram (S : Presieve X) : S.category ⥤ C :=
ObjectProperty.ι _ ⋙ Over.forget X
/-- Given a sieve `S` on `X : C`, its associated cocone `S.cocone` is defined to be
the natural cocone over the diagram defined above with cocone point `X`. -/
abbrev cocone (S : Presieve X) : Cocone S.diagram :=
(Over.forgetCocone X).whisker (ObjectProperty.ι _)
/-- Given a set of arrows `S` all with codomain `X`, and a set of arrows with codomain `Y` for each
`f : Y ⟶ X` in `S`, produce a set of arrows with codomain `X`:
`{ g ≫ f | (f : Y ⟶ X) ∈ S, (g : Z ⟶ Y) ∈ R f }`.
-/
def bind (S : Presieve X) (R : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Presieve Y) : Presieve X := fun Z h =>
∃ (Y : C) (g : Z ⟶ Y) (f : Y ⟶ X) (H : S f), R H g ∧ g ≫ f = h
/-- Structure which contains the data and properties for a morphism `h` satisfying
`Presieve.bind S R h`. -/
structure BindStruct (S : Presieve X) (R : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Presieve Y)
{Z : C} (h : Z ⟶ X) where
/-- the intermediate object -/
Y : C
/-- a morphism in the family of presieves `R` -/
g : Z ⟶ Y
/-- a morphism in the presieve `S` -/
f : Y ⟶ X
hf : S f
hg : R hf g
fac : g ≫ f = h
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] BindStruct.fac
/-- If a morphism `h` satisfies `Presieve.bind S R h`, this is a choice of a structure
in `BindStruct S R h`. -/
noncomputable def bind.bindStruct {S : Presieve X} {R : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Presieve Y}
{Z : C} {h : Z ⟶ X} (H : bind S R h) : BindStruct S R h :=
Nonempty.some (by
obtain ⟨Y, g, f, hf, hg, fac⟩ := H
exact ⟨{ hf := hf, hg := hg, fac := fac, .. }⟩)
lemma BindStruct.bind {S : Presieve X} {R : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Presieve Y}
{Z : C} {h : Z ⟶ X} (b : BindStruct S R h) : bind S R h :=
⟨b.Y, b.g, b.f, b.hf, b.hg, b.fac⟩
@[simp]
theorem bind_comp {S : Presieve X} {R : ∀ ⦃Y : C⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Presieve Y} {g : Z ⟶ Y}
(h₁ : S f) (h₂ : R h₁ g) : bind S R (g ≫ f) :=
⟨_, _, _, h₁, h₂, rfl⟩
-- Porting note: it seems the definition of `Presieve` must be unfolded in order to define
-- this inductive type, it was thus renamed `singleton'`
-- Note we can't make this into `HasSingleton` because of the out-param.
/-- The singleton presieve. -/
inductive singleton' : ⦃Y : C⦄ → (Y ⟶ X) → Prop
| mk : singleton' f
/-- The singleton presieve. -/
def singleton : Presieve X := singleton' f
lemma singleton.mk {f : Y ⟶ X} : singleton f f := singleton'.mk
@[simp]
theorem singleton_eq_iff_domain (f g : Y ⟶ X) : singleton f g ↔ f = g := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩
rfl
· rintro rfl
apply singleton.mk
theorem singleton_self : singleton f f :=
singleton.mk
/-- Pullback a set of arrows with given codomain along a fixed map, by taking the pullback in the
category.
This is not the same as the arrow set of `Sieve.pullback`, but there is a relation between them
in `pullbackArrows_comm`.
-/
inductive pullbackArrows [HasPullbacks C] (R : Presieve X) : Presieve Y
| mk (Z : C) (h : Z ⟶ X) : R h → pullbackArrows _ (pullback.snd h f)
theorem pullback_singleton [HasPullbacks C] (g : Z ⟶ X) :
pullbackArrows f (singleton g) = singleton (pullback.snd g f) := by
funext W
ext h
constructor
· rintro ⟨W, _, _, _⟩
exact singleton.mk
· rintro ⟨_⟩
exact pullbackArrows.mk Z g singleton.mk
/-- Construct the presieve given by the family of arrows indexed by `ι`. -/
inductive ofArrows {ι : Type*} (Y : ι → C) (f : ∀ i, Y i ⟶ X) : Presieve X
| mk (i : ι) : ofArrows _ _ (f i)
theorem ofArrows_pUnit : (ofArrows _ fun _ : PUnit => f) = singleton f := by
funext Y
ext g
constructor
· rintro ⟨_⟩
apply singleton.mk
· rintro ⟨_⟩
exact ofArrows.mk PUnit.unit
theorem ofArrows_pullback [HasPullbacks C] {ι : Type*} (Z : ι → C) (g : ∀ i : ι, Z i ⟶ X) :
(ofArrows (fun i => pullback (g i) f) fun _ => pullback.snd _ _) =
pullbackArrows f (ofArrows Z g) := by
funext T
ext h
constructor
· rintro ⟨hk⟩
exact pullbackArrows.mk _ _ (ofArrows.mk hk)
· rintro ⟨W, k, ⟨_⟩⟩
apply ofArrows.mk
theorem ofArrows_bind {ι : Type*} (Z : ι → C) (g : ∀ i : ι, Z i ⟶ X)
(j : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X), ofArrows Z g f → Type*) (W : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X) (H), j f H → C)
(k : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X) (H i), W f H i ⟶ Y) :
((ofArrows Z g).bind fun _ f H => ofArrows (W f H) (k f H)) =
ofArrows (fun i : Σi, j _ (ofArrows.mk i) => W (g i.1) _ i.2) fun ij =>
k (g ij.1) _ ij.2 ≫ g ij.1 := by
funext Y
ext f
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, _, _, ⟨i⟩, ⟨i'⟩, rfl⟩
exact ofArrows.mk (Sigma.mk _ _)
· rintro ⟨i⟩
exact bind_comp _ (ofArrows.mk _) (ofArrows.mk _)
theorem ofArrows_surj {ι : Type*} {Y : ι → C} (f : ∀ i, Y i ⟶ X) {Z : C} (g : Z ⟶ X)
(hg : ofArrows Y f g) : ∃ (i : ι) (h : Y i = Z),
g = eqToHom h.symm ≫ f i := by
obtain ⟨i⟩ := hg
exact ⟨i, rfl, by simp only [eqToHom_refl, id_comp]⟩
/-- Given a presieve on `F(X)`, we can define a presieve on `X` by taking the preimage via `F`. -/
def functorPullback (R : Presieve (F.obj X)) : Presieve X := fun _ f => R (F.map f)
@[simp]
theorem functorPullback_mem (R : Presieve (F.obj X)) {Y} (f : Y ⟶ X) :
R.functorPullback F f ↔ R (F.map f) :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem functorPullback_id (R : Presieve X) : R.functorPullback (𝟭 _) = R :=
rfl
/-- Given a presieve `R` on `X`, the predicate `R.hasPullbacks` means that for all arrows `f` and
`g` in `R`, the pullback of `f` and `g` exists. -/
class hasPullbacks (R : Presieve X) : Prop where
/-- For all arrows `f` and `g` in `R`, the pullback of `f` and `g` exists. -/
has_pullbacks : ∀ {Y Z} {f : Y ⟶ X} (_ : R f) {g : Z ⟶ X} (_ : R g), HasPullback f g
instance (R : Presieve X) [HasPullbacks C] : R.hasPullbacks := ⟨fun _ _ ↦ inferInstance⟩
instance {α : Type v₂} {X : α → C} {B : C} (π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B)
[(Presieve.ofArrows X π).hasPullbacks] (a b : α) : HasPullback (π a) (π b) :=
Presieve.hasPullbacks.has_pullbacks (Presieve.ofArrows.mk _) (Presieve.ofArrows.mk _)
section FunctorPushforward
variable {E : Type u₃} [Category.{v₃} E] (G : D ⥤ E)
/-- Given a presieve on `X`, we can define a presieve on `F(X)` (which is actually a sieve)
by taking the sieve generated by the image via `F`.
-/
def functorPushforward (S : Presieve X) : Presieve (F.obj X) := fun Y f =>
∃ (Z : C) (g : Z ⟶ X) (h : Y ⟶ F.obj Z), S g ∧ f = h ≫ F.map g
/-- An auxiliary definition in order to fix the choice of the preimages between various definitions.
-/
structure FunctorPushforwardStructure (S : Presieve X) {Y} (f : Y ⟶ F.obj X) where
/-- an object in the source category -/
preobj : C
/-- a map in the source category which has to be in the presieve -/
premap : preobj ⟶ X
/-- the morphism which appear in the factorisation -/
lift : Y ⟶ F.obj preobj
/-- the condition that `premap` is in the presieve -/
cover : S premap
/-- the factorisation of the morphism -/
fac : f = lift ≫ F.map premap
/-- The fixed choice of a preimage. -/
noncomputable def getFunctorPushforwardStructure {F : C ⥤ D} {S : Presieve X} {Y : D}
{f : Y ⟶ F.obj X} (h : S.functorPushforward F f) : FunctorPushforwardStructure F S f := by
choose Z f' g h₁ h using h
exact ⟨Z, f', g, h₁, h⟩
theorem functorPushforward_comp (R : Presieve X) :
R.functorPushforward (F ⋙ G) = (R.functorPushforward F).functorPushforward G := by
funext x
ext f
constructor
· rintro ⟨X, f₁, g₁, h₁, rfl⟩
exact ⟨F.obj X, F.map f₁, g₁, ⟨X, f₁, 𝟙 _, h₁, by simp⟩, rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨X, f₁, g₁, ⟨X', f₂, g₂, h₁, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨X', f₂, g₁ ≫ G.map g₂, h₁, by simp⟩
theorem image_mem_functorPushforward (R : Presieve X) {f : Y ⟶ X} (h : R f) :
R.functorPushforward F (F.map f) :=
⟨Y, f, 𝟙 _, h, by simp⟩
end FunctorPushforward
end Presieve
/--
For an object `X` of a category `C`, a `Sieve X` is a set of morphisms to `X` which is closed under
left-composition.
-/
structure Sieve {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] (X : C) where
/-- the underlying presieve -/
arrows : Presieve X
/-- stability by precomposition -/
downward_closed : ∀ {Y Z f} (_ : arrows f) (g : Z ⟶ Y), arrows (g ≫ f)
namespace Sieve
instance : CoeFun (Sieve X) fun _ => Presieve X :=
⟨Sieve.arrows⟩
initialize_simps_projections Sieve (arrows → apply)
variable {S R : Sieve X}
attribute [simp] downward_closed
theorem arrows_ext : ∀ {R S : Sieve X}, R.arrows = S.arrows → R = S := by
rintro ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ rfl
rfl
@[ext]
protected theorem ext {R S : Sieve X} (h : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X), R f ↔ S f) : R = S :=
arrows_ext <| funext fun _ => funext fun f => propext <| h f
open Lattice
/-- The supremum of a collection of sieves: the union of them all. -/
protected def sup (𝒮 : Set (Sieve X)) : Sieve X where
arrows _ := { f | ∃ S ∈ 𝒮, Sieve.arrows S f }
downward_closed {_ _ f} hf _ := by
obtain ⟨S, hS, hf⟩ := hf
exact ⟨S, hS, S.downward_closed hf _⟩
/-- The infimum of a collection of sieves: the intersection of them all. -/
protected def inf (𝒮 : Set (Sieve X)) : Sieve X where
arrows _ := { f | ∀ S ∈ 𝒮, Sieve.arrows S f }
downward_closed {_ _ _} hf g S H := S.downward_closed (hf S H) g
/-- The union of two sieves is a sieve. -/
protected def union (S R : Sieve X) : Sieve X where
arrows _ f := S f ∨ R f
downward_closed := by rintro _ _ _ (h | h) g <;> simp [h]
/-- The intersection of two sieves is a sieve. -/
protected def inter (S R : Sieve X) : Sieve X where
arrows _ f := S f ∧ R f
downward_closed := by
rintro _ _ _ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ g
simp [h₁, h₂]
/-- Sieves on an object `X` form a complete lattice.
We generate this directly rather than using the galois insertion for nicer definitional properties.
-/
instance : CompleteLattice (Sieve X) where
le S R := ∀ ⦃Y⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X), S f → R f
le_refl _ _ _ := id
le_trans _ _ _ S₁₂ S₂₃ _ _ h := S₂₃ _ (S₁₂ _ h)
le_antisymm _ _ p q := Sieve.ext fun _ _ => ⟨p _, q _⟩
top :=
{ arrows := fun _ => Set.univ
downward_closed := fun _ _ => ⟨⟩ }
bot :=
{ arrows := fun _ => ∅
downward_closed := False.elim }
sup := Sieve.union
inf := Sieve.inter
sSup := Sieve.sup
sInf := Sieve.inf
le_sSup _ S hS _ _ hf := ⟨S, hS, hf⟩
sSup_le := fun _ _ ha _ _ ⟨b, hb, hf⟩ => (ha b hb) _ hf
sInf_le _ _ hS _ _ h := h _ hS
le_sInf _ _ hS _ _ hf _ hR := hS _ hR _ hf
le_sup_left _ _ _ _ := Or.inl
le_sup_right _ _ _ _ := Or.inr
sup_le _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _ f := by--ℰ S hS Y f := by
rintro (hf | hf)
· exact h₁ _ hf
· exact h₂ _ hf
inf_le_left _ _ _ _ := And.left
inf_le_right _ _ _ _ := And.right
le_inf _ _ _ p q _ _ z := ⟨p _ z, q _ z⟩
le_top _ _ _ _ := trivial
bot_le _ _ _ := False.elim
/-- The maximal sieve always exists. -/
instance sieveInhabited : Inhabited (Sieve X) :=
⟨⊤⟩
@[simp]
theorem sInf_apply {Ss : Set (Sieve X)} {Y} (f : Y ⟶ X) :
sInf Ss f ↔ ∀ (S : Sieve X) (_ : S ∈ Ss), S f :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem sSup_apply {Ss : Set (Sieve X)} {Y} (f : Y ⟶ X) :
sSup Ss f ↔ ∃ (S : Sieve X) (_ : S ∈ Ss), S f := by
simp [sSup, Sieve.sup, setOf]
@[simp]
theorem inter_apply {R S : Sieve X} {Y} (f : Y ⟶ X) : (R ⊓ S) f ↔ R f ∧ S f :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem union_apply {R S : Sieve X} {Y} (f : Y ⟶ X) : (R ⊔ S) f ↔ R f ∨ S f :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_apply (f : Y ⟶ X) : (⊤ : Sieve X) f :=
trivial
/-- Generate the smallest sieve containing the given set of arrows. -/
@[simps]
def generate (R : Presieve X) : Sieve X where
arrows Z f := ∃ (Y : _) (h : Z ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ X), R g ∧ h ≫ g = f
downward_closed := by
rintro Y Z _ ⟨W, g, f, hf, rfl⟩ h
exact ⟨_, h ≫ g, _, hf, by simp⟩
/-- Given a presieve on `X`, and a sieve on each domain of an arrow in the presieve, we can bind to
produce a sieve on `X`.
-/
@[simps]
def bind (S : Presieve X) (R : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Sieve Y) : Sieve X where
arrows := S.bind fun _ _ h => R h
downward_closed := by
rintro Y Z f ⟨W, f, h, hh, hf, rfl⟩ g
exact ⟨_, g ≫ f, _, hh, by simp [hf]⟩
/-- Structure which contains the data and properties for a morphism `h` satisfying
`Sieve.bind S R h`. -/
abbrev BindStruct (S : Presieve X) (R : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Sieve Y)
{Z : C} (h : Z ⟶ X) :=
Presieve.BindStruct S (fun _ _ hf ↦ R hf) h
open Order Lattice
theorem generate_le_iff (R : Presieve X) (S : Sieve X) : generate R ≤ S ↔ R ≤ S :=
⟨fun H _ _ hg => H _ ⟨_, 𝟙 _, _, hg, id_comp _⟩, fun ss Y f => by
rintro ⟨Z, f, g, hg, rfl⟩
exact S.downward_closed (ss Z hg) f⟩
/-- Show that there is a galois insertion (generate, set_over). -/
def giGenerate : GaloisInsertion (generate : Presieve X → Sieve X) arrows where
gc := generate_le_iff
choice 𝒢 _ := generate 𝒢
choice_eq _ _ := rfl
le_l_u _ _ _ hf := ⟨_, 𝟙 _, _, hf, id_comp _⟩
theorem le_generate (R : Presieve X) : R ≤ generate R :=
giGenerate.gc.le_u_l R
@[simp]
theorem generate_sieve (S : Sieve X) : generate S = S :=
giGenerate.l_u_eq S
/-- If the identity arrow is in a sieve, the sieve is maximal. -/
theorem id_mem_iff_eq_top : S (𝟙 X) ↔ S = ⊤ :=
⟨fun h => top_unique fun Y f _ => by simpa using downward_closed _ h f, fun h => h.symm ▸ trivial⟩
/-- If an arrow set contains a split epi, it generates the maximal sieve. -/
theorem generate_of_contains_isSplitEpi {R : Presieve X} (f : Y ⟶ X) [IsSplitEpi f] (hf : R f) :
generate R = ⊤ := by
rw [← id_mem_iff_eq_top]
exact ⟨_, section_ f, f, hf, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem generate_of_singleton_isSplitEpi (f : Y ⟶ X) [IsSplitEpi f] :
generate (Presieve.singleton f) = ⊤ :=
generate_of_contains_isSplitEpi f (Presieve.singleton_self _)
@[simp]
theorem generate_top : generate (⊤ : Presieve X) = ⊤ :=
generate_of_contains_isSplitEpi (𝟙 _) ⟨⟩
@[simp]
lemma comp_mem_iff (i : X ⟶ Y) (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso i] (S : Sieve Z) :
S (i ≫ f) ↔ S f := by
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, fun H ↦ S.downward_closed H _⟩
convert S.downward_closed H (inv i)
simp
section
variable {I : Type*} {X : C} (Y : I → C) (f : ∀ i, Y i ⟶ X)
/-- The sieve of `X` generated by family of morphisms `Y i ⟶ X`. -/
abbrev ofArrows : Sieve X := generate (Presieve.ofArrows Y f)
lemma ofArrows_mk (i : I) : ofArrows Y f (f i) :=
⟨_, 𝟙 _, _, ⟨i⟩, by simp⟩
lemma mem_ofArrows_iff {W : C} (g : W ⟶ X) :
ofArrows Y f g ↔ ∃ (i : I) (a : W ⟶ Y i), g = a ≫ f i := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨T, a, b, ⟨i⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨i, a, rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨i, a, rfl⟩
apply downward_closed _ (ofArrows_mk Y f i)
variable {Y f} {W : C} {g : W ⟶ X} (hg : ofArrows Y f g)
include hg in
lemma ofArrows.exists : ∃ (i : I) (h : W ⟶ Y i), g = h ≫ f i := by
obtain ⟨_, h, _, ⟨i⟩, rfl⟩ := hg
exact ⟨i, h, rfl⟩
/-- When `hg : Sieve.ofArrows Y f g`, this is a choice of `i` such that `g`
factors through `f i`. -/
noncomputable def ofArrows.i : I := (ofArrows.exists hg).choose
/-- When `hg : Sieve.ofArrows Y f g`, this is a morphism `h : W ⟶ Y (i hg)` such
that `h ≫ f (i hg) = g`. -/
noncomputable def ofArrows.h : W ⟶ Y (i hg) := (ofArrows.exists hg).choose_spec.choose
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma ofArrows.fac : h hg ≫ f (i hg) = g :=
(ofArrows.exists hg).choose_spec.choose_spec.symm
end
/-- The sieve generated by two morphisms. -/
abbrev ofTwoArrows {U V X : C} (i : U ⟶ X) (j : V ⟶ X) : Sieve X :=
Sieve.ofArrows (Y := pairFunction U V) (fun k ↦ WalkingPair.casesOn k i j)
/-- The sieve of `X : C` that is generated by a family of objects `Y : I → C`:
it consists of morphisms to `X` which factor through at least one of the `Y i`. -/
def ofObjects {I : Type*} (Y : I → C) (X : C) : Sieve X where
| arrows Z _ := ∃ (i : I), Nonempty (Z ⟶ Y i)
downward_closed := by
rintro Z₁ Z₂ p ⟨i, ⟨f⟩⟩ g
exact ⟨i, ⟨g ≫ f⟩⟩
lemma mem_ofObjects_iff {I : Type*} (Y : I → C) {Z X : C} (g : Z ⟶ X) :
ofObjects Y X g ↔ ∃ (i : I), Nonempty (Z ⟶ Y i) := by rfl
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Sieves.lean | 496 | 502 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Guy Leroy. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sangwoo Jo (aka Jason), Guy Leroy, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Semiconj
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Units
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Operations
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Int.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Basic
/-!
# Extended GCD and divisibility over ℤ
## Main definitions
* Given `x y : ℕ`, `xgcd x y` computes the pair of integers `(a, b)` such that
`gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. `gcdA x y` and `gcdB x y` are defined to be `a` and `b`,
respectively.
## Main statements
* `gcd_eq_gcd_ab`: Bézout's lemma, given `x y : ℕ`, `gcd x y = x * gcdA x y + y * gcdB x y`.
## Tags
Bézout's lemma, Bezout's lemma
-/
/-! ### Extended Euclidean algorithm -/
namespace Nat
/-- Helper function for the extended GCD algorithm (`Nat.xgcd`). -/
def xgcdAux : ℕ → ℤ → ℤ → ℕ → ℤ → ℤ → ℕ × ℤ × ℤ
| 0, _, _, r', s', t' => (r', s', t')
| succ k, s, t, r', s', t' =>
let q := r' / succ k
xgcdAux (r' % succ k) (s' - q * s) (t' - q * t) (succ k) s t
termination_by k => k
decreasing_by exact mod_lt _ <| (succ_pos _).gt
@[simp]
theorem xgcd_zero_left {s t r' s' t'} : xgcdAux 0 s t r' s' t' = (r', s', t') := by simp [xgcdAux]
theorem xgcdAux_rec {r s t r' s' t'} (h : 0 < r) :
xgcdAux r s t r' s' t' = xgcdAux (r' % r) (s' - r' / r * s) (t' - r' / r * t) r s t := by
obtain ⟨r, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h.ne'
simp [xgcdAux]
/-- Use the extended GCD algorithm to generate the `a` and `b` values
satisfying `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. -/
def xgcd (x y : ℕ) : ℤ × ℤ :=
(xgcdAux x 1 0 y 0 1).2
/-- The extended GCD `a` value in the equation `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. -/
def gcdA (x y : ℕ) : ℤ :=
(xgcd x y).1
/-- The extended GCD `b` value in the equation `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. -/
def gcdB (x y : ℕ) : ℤ :=
(xgcd x y).2
@[simp]
theorem gcdA_zero_left {s : ℕ} : gcdA 0 s = 0 := by
unfold gcdA
rw [xgcd, xgcd_zero_left]
@[simp]
theorem gcdB_zero_left {s : ℕ} : gcdB 0 s = 1 := by
unfold gcdB
rw [xgcd, xgcd_zero_left]
@[simp]
theorem gcdA_zero_right {s : ℕ} (h : s ≠ 0) : gcdA s 0 = 1 := by
unfold gcdA xgcd
obtain ⟨s, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h
rw [xgcdAux]
simp
@[simp]
theorem gcdB_zero_right {s : ℕ} (h : s ≠ 0) : gcdB s 0 = 0 := by
unfold gcdB xgcd
obtain ⟨s, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h
rw [xgcdAux]
simp
@[simp]
theorem xgcdAux_fst (x y) : ∀ s t s' t', (xgcdAux x s t y s' t').1 = gcd x y :=
gcd.induction x y (by simp) fun x y h IH s t s' t' => by
simp only [h, xgcdAux_rec, IH]
rw [← gcd_rec]
theorem xgcdAux_val (x y) : xgcdAux x 1 0 y 0 1 = (gcd x y, xgcd x y) := by
rw [xgcd, ← xgcdAux_fst x y 1 0 0 1]
theorem xgcd_val (x y) : xgcd x y = (gcdA x y, gcdB x y) := by
unfold gcdA gcdB; cases xgcd x y; rfl
section
variable (x y : ℕ)
private def P : ℕ × ℤ × ℤ → Prop
| (r, s, t) => (r : ℤ) = x * s + y * t
theorem xgcdAux_P {r r'} :
∀ {s t s' t'}, P x y (r, s, t) → P x y (r', s', t') → P x y (xgcdAux r s t r' s' t') := by
induction r, r' using gcd.induction with
| H0 => simp
| H1 a b h IH =>
intro s t s' t' p p'
rw [xgcdAux_rec h]; refine IH ?_ p; dsimp [P] at *
rw [Int.emod_def]; generalize (b / a : ℤ) = k
rw [p, p', Int.mul_sub, sub_add_eq_add_sub, Int.mul_sub, Int.add_mul, mul_comm k t,
mul_comm k s, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, add_comm (x * s * k), ← add_sub_assoc, sub_sub]
/-- **Bézout's lemma**: given `x y : ℕ`, `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`, where `a = gcd_a x y` and
`b = gcd_b x y` are computed by the extended Euclidean algorithm.
-/
theorem gcd_eq_gcd_ab : (gcd x y : ℤ) = x * gcdA x y + y * gcdB x y := by
have := @xgcdAux_P x y x y 1 0 0 1 (by simp [P]) (by simp [P])
rwa [xgcdAux_val, xgcd_val] at this
end
theorem exists_mul_emod_eq_gcd {k n : ℕ} (hk : gcd n k < k) : ∃ m, n * m % k = gcd n k := by
have hk' := Int.ofNat_ne_zero.2 (ne_of_gt (lt_of_le_of_lt (zero_le (gcd n k)) hk))
have key := congr_arg (fun (m : ℤ) => (m % k).toNat) (gcd_eq_gcd_ab n k)
simp only at key
rw [Int.add_mul_emod_self_left, ← Int.natCast_mod, Int.toNat_natCast, mod_eq_of_lt hk] at key
refine ⟨(n.gcdA k % k).toNat, Eq.trans (Int.ofNat.inj ?_) key.symm⟩
rw [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, Int.natCast_mod, Int.natCast_mul,
Int.toNat_of_nonneg (Int.emod_nonneg _ hk'), Int.ofNat_eq_coe,
Int.toNat_of_nonneg (Int.emod_nonneg _ hk'), Int.mul_emod, Int.emod_emod, ← Int.mul_emod]
theorem exists_mul_emod_eq_one_of_coprime {k n : ℕ} (hkn : Coprime n k) (hk : 1 < k) :
∃ m, n * m % k = 1 :=
Exists.recOn (exists_mul_emod_eq_gcd (lt_of_le_of_lt (le_of_eq hkn) hk)) fun m hm ↦
⟨m, hm.trans hkn⟩
end Nat
/-! ### Divisibility over ℤ -/
namespace Int
theorem gcd_def (i j : ℤ) : gcd i j = Nat.gcd i.natAbs j.natAbs := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] protected lemma gcd_natCast_natCast (m n : ℕ) : gcd ↑m ↑n = m.gcd n := rfl
/-- The extended GCD `a` value in the equation `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. -/
def gcdA : ℤ → ℤ → ℤ
| ofNat m, n => m.gcdA n.natAbs
| -[m+1], n => -m.succ.gcdA n.natAbs
/-- The extended GCD `b` value in the equation `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. -/
def gcdB : ℤ → ℤ → ℤ
| m, ofNat n => m.natAbs.gcdB n
| m, -[n+1] => -m.natAbs.gcdB n.succ
/-- **Bézout's lemma** -/
theorem gcd_eq_gcd_ab : ∀ x y : ℤ, (gcd x y : ℤ) = x * gcdA x y + y * gcdB x y
| (m : ℕ), (n : ℕ) => Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab _ _
| (m : ℕ), -[n+1] =>
show (_ : ℤ) = _ + -(n + 1) * -_ by rw [Int.neg_mul_neg]; apply Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab
| -[m+1], (n : ℕ) =>
show (_ : ℤ) = -(m + 1) * -_ + _ by rw [Int.neg_mul_neg]; apply Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab
| -[m+1], -[n+1] =>
show (_ : ℤ) = -(m + 1) * -_ + -(n + 1) * -_ by
rw [Int.neg_mul_neg, Int.neg_mul_neg]
apply Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab
theorem lcm_def (i j : ℤ) : lcm i j = Nat.lcm (natAbs i) (natAbs j) :=
rfl
protected theorem coe_nat_lcm (m n : ℕ) : Int.lcm ↑m ↑n = Nat.lcm m n :=
rfl
theorem dvd_coe_gcd {i j k : ℤ} (h1 : k ∣ i) (h2 : k ∣ j) : k ∣ gcd i j :=
natAbs_dvd.1 <|
natCast_dvd_natCast.2 <| Nat.dvd_gcd (natAbs_dvd_natAbs.2 h1) (natAbs_dvd_natAbs.2 h2)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")] alias dvd_gcd := dvd_coe_gcd
theorem gcd_mul_lcm (i j : ℤ) : gcd i j * lcm i j = natAbs (i * j) := by
rw [Int.gcd, Int.lcm, Nat.gcd_mul_lcm, natAbs_mul]
theorem gcd_comm (i j : ℤ) : gcd i j = gcd j i :=
Nat.gcd_comm _ _
theorem gcd_assoc (i j k : ℤ) : gcd (gcd i j) k = gcd i (gcd j k) :=
Nat.gcd_assoc _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem gcd_self (i : ℤ) : gcd i i = natAbs i := by simp [gcd]
@[simp]
theorem gcd_zero_left (i : ℤ) : gcd 0 i = natAbs i := by simp [gcd]
@[simp]
theorem gcd_zero_right (i : ℤ) : gcd i 0 = natAbs i := by simp [gcd]
theorem gcd_mul_left (i j k : ℤ) : gcd (i * j) (i * k) = natAbs i * gcd j k := by
rw [Int.gcd, Int.gcd, natAbs_mul, natAbs_mul]
apply Nat.gcd_mul_left
theorem gcd_mul_right (i j k : ℤ) : gcd (i * j) (k * j) = gcd i k * natAbs j := by
rw [Int.gcd, Int.gcd, natAbs_mul, natAbs_mul]
apply Nat.gcd_mul_right
theorem gcd_pos_of_ne_zero_left {i : ℤ} (j : ℤ) (hi : i ≠ 0) : 0 < gcd i j :=
Nat.gcd_pos_of_pos_left _ <| natAbs_pos.2 hi
theorem gcd_pos_of_ne_zero_right (i : ℤ) {j : ℤ} (hj : j ≠ 0) : 0 < gcd i j :=
Nat.gcd_pos_of_pos_right _ <| natAbs_pos.2 hj
theorem gcd_eq_zero_iff {i j : ℤ} : gcd i j = 0 ↔ i = 0 ∧ j = 0 := by
rw [gcd, Nat.gcd_eq_zero_iff, natAbs_eq_zero, natAbs_eq_zero]
theorem gcd_pos_iff {i j : ℤ} : 0 < gcd i j ↔ i ≠ 0 ∨ j ≠ 0 :=
Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.trans <| gcd_eq_zero_iff.not.trans not_and_or
theorem gcd_div {i j k : ℤ} (H1 : k ∣ i) (H2 : k ∣ j) :
gcd (i / k) (j / k) = gcd i j / natAbs k := by
rw [gcd, natAbs_ediv_of_dvd i k H1, natAbs_ediv_of_dvd j k H2]
exact Nat.gcd_div (natAbs_dvd_natAbs.mpr H1) (natAbs_dvd_natAbs.mpr H2)
theorem gcd_div_gcd_div_gcd {i j : ℤ} (H : 0 < gcd i j) : gcd (i / gcd i j) (j / gcd i j) = 1 := by
rw [gcd_div gcd_dvd_left gcd_dvd_right, natAbs_ofNat, Nat.div_self H]
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_left {i k : ℤ} (j : ℤ) (H : i ∣ k) : gcd i j ∣ gcd k j :=
Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.1 <| dvd_coe_gcd (gcd_dvd_left.trans H) gcd_dvd_right
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_right {i k : ℤ} (j : ℤ) (H : i ∣ k) : gcd j i ∣ gcd j k :=
Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.1 <| dvd_coe_gcd gcd_dvd_left (gcd_dvd_right.trans H)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left (i j k : ℤ) : gcd i j ∣ gcd (k * i) j :=
gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_left _ (dvd_mul_left _ _)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right (i j k : ℤ) : gcd i j ∣ gcd (i * k) j :=
gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_left _ (dvd_mul_right _ _)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left_right (i j k : ℤ) : gcd i j ∣ gcd i (k * j) :=
gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_right _ (dvd_mul_left _ _)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right_right (i j k : ℤ) : gcd i j ∣ gcd i (j * k) :=
gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_right _ (dvd_mul_right _ _)
/-- If `gcd a (m * n) = 1`, then `gcd a m = 1`. -/
theorem gcd_eq_one_of_gcd_mul_right_eq_one_left {a : ℤ} {m n : ℕ} (h : a.gcd (m * n) = 1) :
a.gcd m = 1 :=
Nat.dvd_one.mp <| h ▸ gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right_right a m n
/-- If `gcd a (m * n) = 1`, then `gcd a n = 1`. -/
theorem gcd_eq_one_of_gcd_mul_right_eq_one_right {a : ℤ} {m n : ℕ} (h : a.gcd (m * n) = 1) :
a.gcd n = 1 :=
Nat.dvd_one.mp <| h ▸ gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left_right a n m
theorem gcd_eq_left {i j : ℤ} (H : i ∣ j) : gcd i j = natAbs i :=
Nat.dvd_antisymm (Nat.gcd_dvd_left _ _) (Nat.dvd_gcd dvd_rfl (natAbs_dvd_natAbs.mpr H))
theorem gcd_eq_right {i j : ℤ} (H : j ∣ i) : gcd i j = natAbs j := by rw [gcd_comm, gcd_eq_left H]
theorem ne_zero_of_gcd {x y : ℤ} (hc : gcd x y ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 ∨ y ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! hc
rw [hc.left, hc.right, gcd_zero_right, natAbs_zero]
theorem exists_gcd_one {m n : ℤ} (H : 0 < gcd m n) :
∃ m' n' : ℤ, gcd m' n' = 1 ∧ m = m' * gcd m n ∧ n = n' * gcd m n :=
⟨_, _, gcd_div_gcd_div_gcd H, (Int.ediv_mul_cancel gcd_dvd_left).symm,
(Int.ediv_mul_cancel gcd_dvd_right).symm⟩
theorem exists_gcd_one' {m n : ℤ} (H : 0 < gcd m n) :
∃ (g : ℕ) (m' n' : ℤ), 0 < g ∧ gcd m' n' = 1 ∧ m = m' * g ∧ n = n' * g :=
let ⟨m', n', h⟩ := exists_gcd_one H
⟨_, m', n', H, h⟩
theorem pow_dvd_pow_iff {m n : ℤ} {k : ℕ} (k0 : k ≠ 0) : m ^ k ∣ n ^ k ↔ m ∣ n := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => pow_dvd_pow_of_dvd h _⟩
rwa [← natAbs_dvd_natAbs, ← Nat.pow_dvd_pow_iff k0, ← Int.natAbs_pow, ← Int.natAbs_pow,
natAbs_dvd_natAbs]
theorem gcd_dvd_iff {a b : ℤ} {n : ℕ} : gcd a b ∣ n ↔ ∃ x y : ℤ, ↑n = a * x + b * y := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [← Nat.mul_div_cancel' h, Int.ofNat_mul, gcd_eq_gcd_ab, Int.add_mul, mul_assoc, mul_assoc]
exact ⟨_, _, rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨x, y, h⟩
rw [← Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, h]
exact Int.dvd_add (dvd_mul_of_dvd_left gcd_dvd_left _) (dvd_mul_of_dvd_left gcd_dvd_right y)
theorem gcd_greatest {a b d : ℤ} (hd_pos : 0 ≤ d) (hda : d ∣ a) (hdb : d ∣ b)
(hd : ∀ e : ℤ, e ∣ a → e ∣ b → e ∣ d) : d = gcd a b :=
dvd_antisymm hd_pos (ofNat_zero_le (gcd a b)) (dvd_coe_gcd hda hdb)
(hd _ gcd_dvd_left gcd_dvd_right)
/-- Euclid's lemma: if `a ∣ b * c` and `gcd a c = 1` then `a ∣ b`.
Compare with `IsCoprime.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left` and
`UniqueFactorizationMonoid.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left_of_no_prime_factors` -/
theorem dvd_of_dvd_mul_left_of_gcd_one {a b c : ℤ} (habc : a ∣ b * c) (hab : gcd a c = 1) :
a ∣ b := by
have := gcd_eq_gcd_ab a c
simp only [hab, Int.ofNat_zero, Int.ofNat_succ, zero_add] at this
have : b * a * gcdA a c + b * c * gcdB a c = b := by simp [mul_assoc, ← Int.mul_add, ← this]
rw [← this]
exact Int.dvd_add (dvd_mul_of_dvd_left (dvd_mul_left a b) _) (dvd_mul_of_dvd_left habc _)
/-- Euclid's lemma: if `a ∣ b * c` and `gcd a b = 1` then `a ∣ c`.
Compare with `IsCoprime.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right` and
`UniqueFactorizationMonoid.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right_of_no_prime_factors` -/
theorem dvd_of_dvd_mul_right_of_gcd_one {a b c : ℤ} (habc : a ∣ b * c) (hab : gcd a b = 1) :
a ∣ c := by
rw [mul_comm] at habc
exact dvd_of_dvd_mul_left_of_gcd_one habc hab
/-- For nonzero integers `a` and `b`, `gcd a b` is the smallest positive natural number that can be
written in the form `a * x + b * y` for some pair of integers `x` and `y` -/
theorem gcd_least_linear {a b : ℤ} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
IsLeast { n : ℕ | 0 < n ∧ ∃ x y : ℤ, ↑n = a * x + b * y } (a.gcd b) := by
simp_rw [← gcd_dvd_iff]
constructor
· simpa [and_true, dvd_refl, Set.mem_setOf_eq] using gcd_pos_of_ne_zero_left b ha
· simp only [lowerBounds, and_imp, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
exact fun n hn_pos hn => Nat.le_of_dvd hn_pos hn
/-! ### lcm -/
theorem lcm_comm (i j : ℤ) : lcm i j = lcm j i := by
rw [Int.lcm, Int.lcm]
exact Nat.lcm_comm _ _
theorem lcm_assoc (i j k : ℤ) : lcm (lcm i j) k = lcm i (lcm j k) := by
rw [Int.lcm, Int.lcm, Int.lcm, Int.lcm, natAbs_ofNat, natAbs_ofNat]
apply Nat.lcm_assoc
@[simp]
theorem lcm_zero_left (i : ℤ) : lcm 0 i = 0 := by
rw [Int.lcm]
apply Nat.lcm_zero_left
@[simp]
theorem lcm_zero_right (i : ℤ) : lcm i 0 = 0 := by
rw [Int.lcm]
apply Nat.lcm_zero_right
@[simp]
theorem lcm_one_left (i : ℤ) : lcm 1 i = natAbs i := by
rw [Int.lcm]
apply Nat.lcm_one_left
@[simp]
theorem lcm_one_right (i : ℤ) : lcm i 1 = natAbs i := by
rw [Int.lcm]
apply Nat.lcm_one_right
theorem coe_lcm_dvd {i j k : ℤ} : i ∣ k → j ∣ k → (lcm i j : ℤ) ∣ k := by
rw [Int.lcm]
intro hi hj
exact natCast_dvd.mpr (Nat.lcm_dvd (natAbs_dvd_natAbs.mpr hi) (natAbs_dvd_natAbs.mpr hj))
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")] alias lcm_dvd := coe_lcm_dvd
|
theorem lcm_mul_left {m n k : ℤ} : (m * n).lcm (m * k) = natAbs m * n.lcm k := by
simp_rw [Int.lcm, natAbs_mul, Nat.lcm_mul_left]
theorem lcm_mul_right {m n k : ℤ} : (m * n).lcm (k * n) = m.lcm k * natAbs n := by
simp_rw [Int.lcm, natAbs_mul, Nat.lcm_mul_right]
| Mathlib/Data/Int/GCD.lean | 369 | 375 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.MFDeriv.Tangent
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.ContMDiffMap
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.VectorBundle.Hom
/-!
### Interactions between differentiability, smoothness and manifold derivatives
We give the relation between `MDifferentiable`, `ContMDiff`, `mfderiv`, `tangentMap`
and related notions.
## Main statements
* `ContMDiffOn.contMDiffOn_tangentMapWithin` states that the bundled derivative
of a `Cⁿ` function in a domain is `Cᵐ` when `m + 1 ≤ n`.
* `ContMDiff.contMDiff_tangentMap` states that the bundled derivative
of a `Cⁿ` function is `Cᵐ` when `m + 1 ≤ n`.
-/
open Set Function Filter ChartedSpace IsManifold Bundle
open scoped Topology Manifold Bundle
/-! ### Definition of `C^n` functions between manifolds -/
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {m n : WithTop ℕ∞}
-- declare a charted space `M` over the pair `(E, H)`.
{E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
{I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H} {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
-- declare a charted space `M'` over the pair `(E', H')`.
{E' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H']
{I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'} {M' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M'] [ChartedSpace H' M']
-- declare a `C^n` manifold `N` over the pair `(F, G)`.
{F : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] {G : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G]
{J : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 F G} {N : Type*} [TopologicalSpace N] [ChartedSpace G N]
[Js : IsManifold J 1 N]
-- declare a charted space `N'` over the pair `(F', G')`.
{F' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F'] {G' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G']
{J' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 F' G'} {N' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace N'] [ChartedSpace G' N']
-- declare functions, sets
{f : M → M'} {s : Set M}
-- Porting note: section about deducing differentiability for `C^n` functions moved to
-- `Geometry.Manifold.MFDeriv.Basic`
/-! ### The derivative of a `C^(n+1)` function is `C^n` -/
section mfderiv
variable [Is : IsManifold I 1 M] [I's : IsManifold I' 1 M']
/-- The function that sends `x` to the `y`-derivative of `f (x, y)` at `g (x)` is `C^m` at `x₀`,
where the derivative is taken as a continuous linear map.
We have to assume that `f` is `C^n` at `(x₀, g(x₀))` for `n ≥ m + 1` and `g` is `C^m` at `x₀`.
We have to insert a coordinate change from `x₀` to `x` to make the derivative sensible.
Version within a set.
-/
protected theorem ContMDiffWithinAt.mfderivWithin {x₀ : N} {f : N → M → M'} {g : N → M}
{t : Set N} {u : Set M}
(hf : ContMDiffWithinAt (J.prod I) I' n (Function.uncurry f) (t ×ˢ u) (x₀, g x₀))
(hg : ContMDiffWithinAt J I m g t x₀) (hx₀ : x₀ ∈ t)
(hu : MapsTo g t u) (hmn : m + 1 ≤ n) (h'u : UniqueMDiffOn I u) :
ContMDiffWithinAt J 𝓘(𝕜, E →L[𝕜] E') m
(inTangentCoordinates I I' g (fun x => f x (g x))
(fun x => mfderivWithin I I' (f x) u (g x)) x₀) t x₀ := by
-- first localize the result to a smaller set, to make sure everything happens in chart domains
let t' := t ∩ g ⁻¹' ((extChartAt I (g x₀)).source)
have ht't : t' ⊆ t := inter_subset_left
suffices ContMDiffWithinAt J 𝓘(𝕜, E →L[𝕜] E') m
(inTangentCoordinates I I' g (fun x ↦ f x (g x))
(fun x ↦ mfderivWithin I I' (f x) u (g x)) x₀) t' x₀ by
apply ContMDiffWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin this
apply inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin
exact hg.continuousWithinAt.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin (extChartAt_source_mem_nhds (g x₀))
-- register a few basic facts that maps send suitable neighborhoods to suitable neighborhoods,
-- by continuity
have hx₀gx₀ : (x₀, g x₀) ∈ t ×ˢ u := by simp [hx₀, hu hx₀]
have h4f : ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => f x (g x)) t x₀ := by
change ContinuousWithinAt ((Function.uncurry f) ∘ (fun x ↦ (x, g x))) t x₀
refine ContinuousWithinAt.comp hf.continuousWithinAt ?_ (fun y hy ↦ by simp [hy, hu hy])
exact (continuousWithinAt_id.prodMk hg.continuousWithinAt)
have h4f := h4f.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin (extChartAt_source_mem_nhds (I := I') (f x₀ (g x₀)))
have h3f := (contMDiffWithinAt_iff_contMDiffWithinAt_nhdsWithin (by simp)).mp
(hf.of_le <| (self_le_add_left 1 m).trans hmn)
simp only [Nat.cast_one, hx₀gx₀, insert_eq_of_mem] at h3f
have h2f : ∀ᶠ x₂ in 𝓝[t] x₀, ContMDiffWithinAt I I' 1 (f x₂) u (g x₂) := by
have : MapsTo (fun x ↦ (x, g x)) t (t ×ˢ u) := fun y hy ↦ by simp [hy, hu hy]
filter_upwards [((continuousWithinAt_id.prodMk hg.continuousWithinAt)
|>.tendsto_nhdsWithin this).eventually h3f, self_mem_nhdsWithin] with x hx h'x
apply hx.comp (g x) (contMDiffWithinAt_const.prodMk contMDiffWithinAt_id)
exact fun y hy ↦ by simp [h'x, hy]
have h2g : g ⁻¹' (extChartAt I (g x₀)).source ∈ 𝓝[t] x₀ :=
hg.continuousWithinAt.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin (extChartAt_source_mem_nhds (g x₀))
-- key point: the derivative of `f` composed with extended charts, at the point `g x` read in the
-- chart, is `C^n` in the vector space sense. This follows from `ContDiffWithinAt.fderivWithin`,
-- which is the vector space analogue of the result we are proving.
have : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 m (fun x ↦ fderivWithin 𝕜
(extChartAt I' (f x₀ (g x₀)) ∘ f ((extChartAt J x₀).symm x) ∘ (extChartAt I (g x₀)).symm)
((extChartAt I (g x₀)).target ∩ (extChartAt I (g x₀)).symm ⁻¹' u)
(extChartAt I (g x₀) (g ((extChartAt J x₀).symm x))))
((extChartAt J x₀).symm ⁻¹' t' ∩ range J) (extChartAt J x₀ x₀) := by
have hf' := hf.mono (prod_mono_left ht't)
have hg' := hg.mono (show t' ⊆ t from inter_subset_left)
rw [contMDiffWithinAt_iff] at hf' hg'
simp_rw [Function.comp_def, uncurry, extChartAt_prod, PartialEquiv.prod_coe_symm,
ModelWithCorners.range_prod] at hf' ⊢
apply ContDiffWithinAt.fderivWithin _ _ _ (show (m : WithTop ℕ∞) + 1 ≤ n from mod_cast hmn )
· simp [hx₀, t']
· apply inter_subset_left.trans
rw [preimage_subset_iff]
intro a ha
refine ⟨PartialEquiv.map_source _ (inter_subset_right ha :), ?_⟩
rw [mem_preimage, PartialEquiv.left_inv (extChartAt I (g x₀))]
· exact hu (inter_subset_left ha)
· exact (inter_subset_right ha :)
· have : ((fun p ↦ ((extChartAt J x₀).symm p.1, (extChartAt I (g x₀)).symm p.2)) ⁻¹' t' ×ˢ u
∩ range J ×ˢ (extChartAt I (g x₀)).target)
⊆ ((fun p ↦ ((extChartAt J x₀).symm p.1, (extChartAt I (g x₀)).symm p.2)) ⁻¹' t' ×ˢ u
∩ range J ×ˢ range I) := by
apply inter_subset_inter_right
exact Set.prod_mono_right (extChartAt_target_subset_range (g x₀))
convert hf'.2.mono this
· ext y; simp; tauto
· simp
· exact hg'.2
· exact UniqueMDiffOn.uniqueDiffOn_target_inter h'u (g x₀)
-- reformulate the previous point as `C^n` in the manifold sense (but still for a map between
-- vector spaces)
have :
ContMDiffWithinAt J 𝓘(𝕜, E →L[𝕜] E') m
(fun x =>
fderivWithin 𝕜 (extChartAt I' (f x₀ (g x₀)) ∘ f x ∘ (extChartAt I (g x₀)).symm)
((extChartAt I (g x₀)).target ∩ (extChartAt I (g x₀)).symm ⁻¹' u)
(extChartAt I (g x₀) (g x))) t' x₀ := by
simp_rw [contMDiffWithinAt_iff_source (x := x₀),
contMDiffWithinAt_iff_contDiffWithinAt, Function.comp_def]
exact this
-- finally, argue that the map we control in the previous point coincides locally with the map we
-- want to prove the regularity of, so regularity of the latter follows from regularity of the
-- former.
apply this.congr_of_eventuallyEq_of_mem _ (by simp [t', hx₀])
apply nhdsWithin_mono _ ht't
filter_upwards [h2f, h4f, h2g, self_mem_nhdsWithin] with x hx h'x h2 hxt
have h1 : g x ∈ u := hu hxt
have h3 : UniqueMDiffWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E)
((extChartAt I (g x₀)).target ∩ (extChartAt I (g x₀)).symm ⁻¹' u)
((extChartAt I (g x₀)) (g x)) := by
apply UniqueDiffWithinAt.uniqueMDiffWithinAt
apply UniqueMDiffOn.uniqueDiffOn_target_inter h'u
refine ⟨PartialEquiv.map_source _ h2, ?_⟩
rwa [mem_preimage, PartialEquiv.left_inv _ h2]
have A : mfderivWithin 𝓘(𝕜, E) I ((extChartAt I (g x₀)).symm)
(range I) ((extChartAt I (g x₀)) (g x))
= mfderivWithin 𝓘(𝕜, E) I ((extChartAt I (g x₀)).symm)
((extChartAt I (g x₀)).target ∩ (extChartAt I (g x₀)).symm ⁻¹' u)
((extChartAt I (g x₀)) (g x)) := by
apply (MDifferentiableWithinAt.mfderivWithin_mono _ h3 _).symm
· apply mdifferentiableWithinAt_extChartAt_symm
exact PartialEquiv.map_source (extChartAt I (g x₀)) h2
· exact inter_subset_left.trans (extChartAt_target_subset_range (g x₀))
rw [inTangentCoordinates_eq_mfderiv_comp, A,
← mfderivWithin_comp_of_eq, ← mfderiv_comp_mfderivWithin_of_eq]
· exact mfderivWithin_eq_fderivWithin
· exact mdifferentiableAt_extChartAt (by simpa using h'x)
· apply MDifferentiableWithinAt.comp (I' := I) (u := u) _ _ _ inter_subset_right
· convert hx.mdifferentiableWithinAt le_rfl
exact PartialEquiv.left_inv (extChartAt I (g x₀)) h2
· apply (mdifferentiableWithinAt_extChartAt_symm _).mono
· exact inter_subset_left.trans (extChartAt_target_subset_range (g x₀))
· exact PartialEquiv.map_source (extChartAt I (g x₀)) h2
· exact h3
· simp only [Function.comp_def, PartialEquiv.left_inv (extChartAt I (g x₀)) h2]
· exact hx.mdifferentiableWithinAt le_rfl
· apply (mdifferentiableWithinAt_extChartAt_symm _).mono
· exact inter_subset_left.trans (extChartAt_target_subset_range (g x₀))
· exact PartialEquiv.map_source (extChartAt I (g x₀)) h2
· exact inter_subset_right
· exact h3
· exact PartialEquiv.left_inv (extChartAt I (g x₀)) h2
· simpa using h2
· simpa using h'x
/-- The derivative `D_yf(y)` is `C^m` at `x₀`, where the derivative is taken as a continuous
linear map. We have to assume that `f` is `C^n` at `x₀` for some `n ≥ m + 1`.
We have to insert a coordinate change from `x₀` to `x` to make the derivative sensible.
This is a special case of `ContMDiffWithinAt.mfderivWithin` where `f` does not contain any
parameters and `g = id`.
-/
theorem ContMDiffWithinAt.mfderivWithin_const {x₀ : M} {f : M → M'}
(hf : ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x₀)
(hmn : m + 1 ≤ n) (hx : x₀ ∈ s) (hs : UniqueMDiffOn I s) :
ContMDiffWithinAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E →L[𝕜] E') m
(inTangentCoordinates I I' id f (mfderivWithin I I' f s) x₀) s x₀ := by
have : ContMDiffWithinAt (I.prod I) I' n (fun x : M × M => f x.2) (s ×ˢ s) (x₀, x₀) :=
ContMDiffWithinAt.comp (x₀, x₀) hf contMDiffWithinAt_snd mapsTo_snd_prod
exact this.mfderivWithin contMDiffWithinAt_id hx (mapsTo_id _) hmn hs
/-- The function that sends `x` to the `y`-derivative of `f(x,y)` at `g(x)` applied to `g₂(x)` is
`C^n` at `x₀`, where the derivative is taken as a continuous linear map.
We have to assume that `f` is `C^(n+1)` at `(x₀, g(x₀))` and `g` is `C^n` at `x₀`.
We have to insert a coordinate change from `x₀` to `g₁(x)` to make the derivative sensible.
This is similar to `ContMDiffWithinAt.mfderivWithin`, but where the continuous linear map is
applied to a (variable) vector.
-/
theorem ContMDiffWithinAt.mfderivWithin_apply {x₀ : N'}
{f : N → M → M'} {g : N → M} {g₁ : N' → N} {g₂ : N' → E} {t : Set N} {u : Set M} {v : Set N'}
(hf : ContMDiffWithinAt (J.prod I) I' n (Function.uncurry f) (t ×ˢ u) (g₁ x₀, g (g₁ x₀)))
(hg : ContMDiffWithinAt J I m g t (g₁ x₀)) (hg₁ : ContMDiffWithinAt J' J m g₁ v x₀)
(hg₂ : ContMDiffWithinAt J' 𝓘(𝕜, E) m g₂ v x₀) (hmn : m + 1 ≤ n) (h'g₁ : MapsTo g₁ v t)
(hg₁x₀ : g₁ x₀ ∈ t) (h'g : MapsTo g t u) (hu : UniqueMDiffOn I u) :
ContMDiffWithinAt J' 𝓘(𝕜, E') m
(fun x => (inTangentCoordinates I I' g (fun x => f x (g x))
(fun x => mfderivWithin I I' (f x) u (g x)) (g₁ x₀) (g₁ x)) (g₂ x)) v x₀ :=
((hf.mfderivWithin hg hg₁x₀ h'g hmn hu).comp_of_eq hg₁ h'g₁ rfl).clm_apply hg₂
/-- The function that sends `x` to the `y`-derivative of `f (x, y)` at `g (x)` is `C^m` at `x₀`,
where the derivative is taken as a continuous linear map.
| We have to assume that `f` is `C^n` at `(x₀, g(x₀))` for `n ≥ m + 1` and `g` is `C^m` at `x₀`.
We have to insert a coordinate change from `x₀` to `x` to make the derivative sensible.
This result is used to show that maps into the 1-jet bundle and cotangent bundle are `C^n`.
`ContMDiffAt.mfderiv_const` is a special case of this.
-/
protected theorem ContMDiffAt.mfderiv {x₀ : N} (f : N → M → M') (g : N → M)
(hf : ContMDiffAt (J.prod I) I' n (Function.uncurry f) (x₀, g x₀)) (hg : ContMDiffAt J I m g x₀)
(hmn : m + 1 ≤ n) :
ContMDiffAt J 𝓘(𝕜, E →L[𝕜] E') m
(inTangentCoordinates I I' g (fun x ↦ f x (g x)) (fun x ↦ mfderiv I I' (f x) (g x)) x₀)
x₀ := by
rw [← contMDiffWithinAt_univ] at hf hg ⊢
rw [← univ_prod_univ] at hf
simp_rw [← mfderivWithin_univ]
exact ContMDiffWithinAt.mfderivWithin hf hg (mem_univ _) (mapsTo_univ _ _) hmn
uniqueMDiffOn_univ
/-- The derivative `D_yf(y)` is `C^m` at `x₀`, where the derivative is taken as a continuous
linear map. We have to assume that `f` is `C^n` at `x₀` for some `n ≥ m + 1`.
We have to insert a coordinate change from `x₀` to `x` to make the derivative sensible.
This is a special case of `ContMDiffAt.mfderiv` where `f` does not contain any parameters and
`g = id`.
-/
theorem ContMDiffAt.mfderiv_const {x₀ : M} {f : M → M'} (hf : ContMDiffAt I I' n f x₀)
(hmn : m + 1 ≤ n) :
ContMDiffAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E →L[𝕜] E') m (inTangentCoordinates I I' id f (mfderiv I I' f) x₀) x₀ :=
haveI : ContMDiffAt (I.prod I) I' n (fun x : M × M => f x.2) (x₀, x₀) :=
ContMDiffAt.comp (x₀, x₀) hf contMDiffAt_snd
this.mfderiv (fun _ => f) id contMDiffAt_id hmn
/-- The function that sends `x` to the `y`-derivative of `f(x,y)` at `g(x)` applied to `g₂(x)` is
`C^n` at `x₀`, where the derivative is taken as a continuous linear map.
We have to assume that `f` is `C^(n+1)` at `(x₀, g(x₀))` and `g` is `C^n` at `x₀`.
We have to insert a coordinate change from `x₀` to `g₁(x)` to make the derivative sensible.
This is similar to `ContMDiffAt.mfderiv`, but where the continuous linear map is applied to a
(variable) vector.
-/
theorem ContMDiffAt.mfderiv_apply {x₀ : N'} (f : N → M → M') (g : N → M) (g₁ : N' → N) (g₂ : N' → E)
(hf : ContMDiffAt (J.prod I) I' n (Function.uncurry f) (g₁ x₀, g (g₁ x₀)))
(hg : ContMDiffAt J I m g (g₁ x₀)) (hg₁ : ContMDiffAt J' J m g₁ x₀)
(hg₂ : ContMDiffAt J' 𝓘(𝕜, E) m g₂ x₀) (hmn : m + 1 ≤ n) :
ContMDiffAt J' 𝓘(𝕜, E') m
(fun x => inTangentCoordinates I I' g (fun x => f x (g x))
(fun x => mfderiv I I' (f x) (g x)) (g₁ x₀) (g₁ x) (g₂ x)) x₀ :=
((hf.mfderiv f g hg hmn).comp_of_eq hg₁ rfl).clm_apply hg₂
end mfderiv
/-! ### The tangent map of a `C^(n+1)` function is `C^n` -/
section tangentMap
variable [Is : IsManifold I 1 M] [I's : IsManifold I' 1 M']
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/ContMDiffMFDeriv.lean | 227 | 280 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.NNReal.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.MonotoneContinuity
/-!
# Square root of a real number
In this file we define
* `NNReal.sqrt` to be the square root of a nonnegative real number.
* `Real.sqrt` to be the square root of a real number, defined to be zero on negative numbers.
Then we prove some basic properties of these functions.
## Implementation notes
We define `NNReal.sqrt` as the noncomputable inverse to the function `x ↦ x * x`. We use general
theory of inverses of strictly monotone functions to prove that `NNReal.sqrt x` exists. As a side
effect, `NNReal.sqrt` is a bundled `OrderIso`, so for `NNReal` numbers we get continuity as well as
theorems like `NNReal.sqrt x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y * y` for free.
Then we define `Real.sqrt x` to be `NNReal.sqrt (Real.toNNReal x)`.
## Tags
square root
-/
open Set Filter
open scoped Filter NNReal Topology
namespace NNReal
variable {x y : ℝ≥0}
/-- Square root of a nonnegative real number. -/
-- Porting note (kmill): `pp_nodot` has no effect here
-- unless RFC https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/6178 leads to dot notation pp for CoeFun
@[pp_nodot]
noncomputable def sqrt : ℝ≥0 ≃o ℝ≥0 :=
OrderIso.symm <| powOrderIso 2 two_ne_zero
@[simp] lemma sq_sqrt (x : ℝ≥0) : sqrt x ^ 2 = x := sqrt.symm_apply_apply _
@[simp] lemma sqrt_sq (x : ℝ≥0) : sqrt (x ^ 2) = x := sqrt.apply_symm_apply _
@[simp] lemma mul_self_sqrt (x : ℝ≥0) : sqrt x * sqrt x = x := by rw [← sq, sq_sqrt]
@[simp] lemma sqrt_mul_self (x : ℝ≥0) : sqrt (x * x) = x := by rw [← sq, sqrt_sq]
lemma sqrt_le_sqrt : sqrt x ≤ sqrt y ↔ x ≤ y := sqrt.le_iff_le
lemma sqrt_lt_sqrt : sqrt x < sqrt y ↔ x < y := sqrt.lt_iff_lt
lemma sqrt_eq_iff_eq_sq : sqrt x = y ↔ x = y ^ 2 := sqrt.toEquiv.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply
lemma sqrt_le_iff_le_sq : sqrt x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y ^ 2 := sqrt.to_galoisConnection _ _
lemma le_sqrt_iff_sq_le : x ≤ sqrt y ↔ x ^ 2 ≤ y := (sqrt.symm.to_galoisConnection _ _).symm
@[simp] lemma sqrt_eq_zero : sqrt x = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by simp [sqrt_eq_iff_eq_sq]
@[simp] lemma sqrt_eq_one : sqrt x = 1 ↔ x = 1 := by simp [sqrt_eq_iff_eq_sq]
@[simp] lemma sqrt_zero : sqrt 0 = 0 := by simp
@[simp] lemma sqrt_one : sqrt 1 = 1 := by simp
@[simp] lemma sqrt_le_one : sqrt x ≤ 1 ↔ x ≤ 1 := by rw [← sqrt_one, sqrt_le_sqrt, sqrt_one]
@[simp] lemma one_le_sqrt : 1 ≤ sqrt x ↔ 1 ≤ x := by rw [← sqrt_one, sqrt_le_sqrt, sqrt_one]
theorem sqrt_mul (x y : ℝ≥0) : sqrt (x * y) = sqrt x * sqrt y := by
rw [sqrt_eq_iff_eq_sq, mul_pow, sq_sqrt, sq_sqrt]
/-- `NNReal.sqrt` as a `MonoidWithZeroHom`. -/
noncomputable def sqrtHom : ℝ≥0 →*₀ ℝ≥0 :=
⟨⟨sqrt, sqrt_zero⟩, sqrt_one, sqrt_mul⟩
theorem sqrt_inv (x : ℝ≥0) : sqrt x⁻¹ = (sqrt x)⁻¹ :=
map_inv₀ sqrtHom x
theorem sqrt_div (x y : ℝ≥0) : sqrt (x / y) = sqrt x / sqrt y :=
map_div₀ sqrtHom x y
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sqrt : Continuous sqrt := sqrt.continuous
@[simp] theorem sqrt_pos : 0 < sqrt x ↔ 0 < x := by simp [pos_iff_ne_zero]
alias ⟨_, sqrt_pos_of_pos⟩ := sqrt_pos
attribute [bound] sqrt_pos_of_pos
end NNReal
namespace Real
/-- The square root of a real number. This returns 0 for negative inputs.
This has notation `√x`. Note that `√x⁻¹` is parsed as `√(x⁻¹)`. -/
noncomputable def sqrt (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
NNReal.sqrt (Real.toNNReal x)
-- TODO: replace this with a typeclass
@[inherit_doc]
prefix:max "√" => Real.sqrt
variable {x y : ℝ}
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sqrt {x : ℝ≥0} : (NNReal.sqrt x : ℝ) = √(x : ℝ) := by
rw [Real.sqrt, Real.toNNReal_coe]
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_sqrt : Continuous (√· : ℝ → ℝ) :=
NNReal.continuous_coe.comp <| NNReal.continuous_sqrt.comp continuous_real_toNNReal
theorem sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos (h : x ≤ 0) : sqrt x = 0 := by simp [sqrt, Real.toNNReal_eq_zero.2 h]
@[simp] theorem sqrt_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ √x := NNReal.coe_nonneg _
@[simp]
theorem mul_self_sqrt (h : 0 ≤ x) : √x * √x = x := by
rw [Real.sqrt, ← NNReal.coe_mul, NNReal.mul_self_sqrt, Real.coe_toNNReal _ h]
@[simp]
theorem sqrt_mul_self (h : 0 ≤ x) : √(x * x) = x :=
(mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (sqrt_nonneg _) h).1 (mul_self_sqrt (mul_self_nonneg _))
theorem sqrt_eq_cases : √x = y ↔ y * y = x ∧ 0 ≤ y ∨ x < 0 ∧ y = 0 := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
rcases le_or_lt 0 x with hle | hlt
· exact Or.inl ⟨mul_self_sqrt hle, sqrt_nonneg x⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨hlt, sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos hlt.le⟩
· rintro (⟨rfl, hy⟩ | ⟨hx, rfl⟩)
exacts [sqrt_mul_self hy, sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos hx.le]
theorem sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) : √x = y ↔ x = y * y :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← h, mul_self_sqrt hx], fun h => by rw [h, sqrt_mul_self hy]⟩
theorem sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq_of_pos (h : 0 < y) : √x = y ↔ y * y = x := by
simp [sqrt_eq_cases, h.ne', h.le]
@[simp]
theorem sqrt_eq_one : √x = 1 ↔ x = 1 :=
calc
√x = 1 ↔ 1 * 1 = x := sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq_of_pos zero_lt_one
_ ↔ x = 1 := by rw [eq_comm, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem sq_sqrt (h : 0 ≤ x) : √x ^ 2 = x := by rw [sq, mul_self_sqrt h]
@[simp]
theorem sqrt_sq (h : 0 ≤ x) : √(x ^ 2) = x := by rw [sq, sqrt_mul_self h]
theorem sqrt_eq_iff_eq_sq (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) : √x = y ↔ x = y ^ 2 := by
rw [sq, sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq hx hy]
theorem sqrt_mul_self_eq_abs (x : ℝ) : √(x * x) = |x| := by
rw [← abs_mul_abs_self x, sqrt_mul_self (abs_nonneg _)]
theorem sqrt_sq_eq_abs (x : ℝ) : √(x ^ 2) = |x| := by rw [sq, sqrt_mul_self_eq_abs]
@[simp]
theorem sqrt_zero : √0 = 0 := by simp [Real.sqrt]
@[simp]
theorem sqrt_one : √1 = 1 := by simp [Real.sqrt]
@[simp]
theorem sqrt_le_sqrt_iff (hy : 0 ≤ y) : √x ≤ √y ↔ x ≤ y := by
rw [Real.sqrt, Real.sqrt, NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.sqrt_le_sqrt, toNNReal_le_toNNReal_iff hy]
@[simp]
theorem sqrt_lt_sqrt_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) : √x < √y ↔ x < y :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (sqrt_le_sqrt_iff hx)
theorem sqrt_lt_sqrt_iff_of_pos (hy : 0 < y) : √x < √y ↔ x < y := by
rw [Real.sqrt, Real.sqrt, NNReal.coe_lt_coe, NNReal.sqrt_lt_sqrt, toNNReal_lt_toNNReal_iff hy]
@[gcongr, bound]
theorem sqrt_le_sqrt (h : x ≤ y) : √x ≤ √y := by
rw [Real.sqrt, Real.sqrt, NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.sqrt_le_sqrt]
exact toNNReal_le_toNNReal h
@[gcongr, bound]
theorem sqrt_lt_sqrt (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : x < y) : √x < √y :=
(sqrt_lt_sqrt_iff hx).2 h
theorem sqrt_le_left (hy : 0 ≤ y) : √x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y ^ 2 := by
rw [sqrt, ← Real.le_toNNReal_iff_coe_le hy, NNReal.sqrt_le_iff_le_sq, sq, ← Real.toNNReal_mul hy,
Real.toNNReal_le_toNNReal_iff (mul_self_nonneg y), sq]
theorem sqrt_le_iff : √x ≤ y ↔ 0 ≤ y ∧ x ≤ y ^ 2 := by
rw [← and_iff_right_of_imp fun h => (sqrt_nonneg x).trans h, and_congr_right_iff]
exact sqrt_le_left
theorem sqrt_lt (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) : √x < y ↔ x < y ^ 2 := by
rw [← sqrt_lt_sqrt_iff hx, sqrt_sq hy]
theorem sqrt_lt' (hy : 0 < y) : √x < y ↔ x < y ^ 2 := by
rw [← sqrt_lt_sqrt_iff_of_pos (pow_pos hy _), sqrt_sq hy.le]
/-- Note: if you want to conclude `x ≤ √y`, then use `Real.le_sqrt_of_sq_le`.
If you have `x > 0`, consider using `Real.le_sqrt'` -/
theorem le_sqrt (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) : x ≤ √y ↔ x ^ 2 ≤ y :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 <| sqrt_lt hy hx
theorem le_sqrt' (hx : 0 < x) : x ≤ √y ↔ x ^ 2 ≤ y :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 <| sqrt_lt' hx
theorem abs_le_sqrt (h : x ^ 2 ≤ y) : |x| ≤ √y := by
rw [← sqrt_sq_eq_abs]; exact sqrt_le_sqrt h
theorem sq_le (h : 0 ≤ y) : x ^ 2 ≤ y ↔ -√y ≤ x ∧ x ≤ √y := by
constructor
· simpa only [abs_le] using abs_le_sqrt
· rw [← abs_le, ← sq_abs]
exact (le_sqrt (abs_nonneg x) h).mp
theorem neg_sqrt_le_of_sq_le (h : x ^ 2 ≤ y) : -√y ≤ x :=
((sq_le ((sq_nonneg x).trans h)).mp h).1
theorem le_sqrt_of_sq_le (h : x ^ 2 ≤ y) : x ≤ √y :=
((sq_le ((sq_nonneg x).trans h)).mp h).2
@[simp]
theorem sqrt_inj (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) : √x = √y ↔ x = y := by
simp [le_antisymm_iff, hx, hy]
@[simp]
theorem sqrt_eq_zero (h : 0 ≤ x) : √x = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by simpa using sqrt_inj h le_rfl
theorem sqrt_eq_zero' : √x = 0 ↔ x ≤ 0 := by
rw [sqrt, NNReal.coe_eq_zero, NNReal.sqrt_eq_zero, Real.toNNReal_eq_zero]
theorem sqrt_ne_zero (h : 0 ≤ x) : √x ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 := by rw [not_iff_not, sqrt_eq_zero h]
theorem sqrt_ne_zero' : √x ≠ 0 ↔ 0 < x := by rw [← not_le, not_iff_not, sqrt_eq_zero']
@[simp]
theorem sqrt_pos : 0 < √x ↔ 0 < x :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (Iff.trans (by simp [le_antisymm_iff, sqrt_nonneg]) sqrt_eq_zero')
alias ⟨_, sqrt_pos_of_pos⟩ := sqrt_pos
lemma sqrt_le_sqrt_iff' (hx : 0 < x) : √x ≤ √y ↔ x ≤ y := by
obtain hy | hy := le_total y 0
· exact iff_of_false ((sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos hy).trans_lt <| sqrt_pos.2 hx).not_le
(hy.trans_lt hx).not_le
· exact sqrt_le_sqrt_iff hy
@[simp] lemma one_le_sqrt : 1 ≤ √x ↔ 1 ≤ x := by
rw [← sqrt_one, sqrt_le_sqrt_iff' zero_lt_one, sqrt_one]
@[simp] lemma sqrt_le_one : √x ≤ 1 ↔ x ≤ 1 := by
rw [← sqrt_one, sqrt_le_sqrt_iff zero_le_one, sqrt_one]
end Real
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq Function
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: a square root of a strictly positive nonnegative real is
positive. -/
@[positivity NNReal.sqrt _]
def evalNNRealSqrt : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(NNReal), ~q(NNReal.sqrt $a) =>
let ra ← core q(inferInstance) q(inferInstance) a
assertInstancesCommute
match ra with
| .positive pa => pure (.positive q(NNReal.sqrt_pos_of_pos $pa))
| _ => failure -- this case is dealt with by generic nonnegativity of nnreals
| _, _, _ => throwError "not NNReal.sqrt"
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: a square root is nonnegative, and is strictly positive if
its input is. -/
@[positivity √_]
def evalSqrt : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(√$a) =>
let ra ← catchNone <| core q(inferInstance) q(inferInstance) a
assertInstancesCommute
match ra with
| .positive pa => pure (.positive q(Real.sqrt_pos_of_pos $pa))
| _ => pure (.nonnegative q(Real.sqrt_nonneg $a))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not Real.sqrt"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
namespace Real
@[simp]
theorem sqrt_mul {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : √(x * y) = √x * √y := by
simp_rw [Real.sqrt, ← NNReal.coe_mul, NNReal.coe_inj, Real.toNNReal_mul hx, NNReal.sqrt_mul]
@[simp]
theorem sqrt_mul' (x) {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 ≤ y) : √(x * y) = √x * √y := by
rw [mul_comm, sqrt_mul hy, mul_comm]
@[simp]
theorem sqrt_inv (x : ℝ) : √x⁻¹ = (√x)⁻¹ := by
rw [Real.sqrt, Real.toNNReal_inv, NNReal.sqrt_inv, NNReal.coe_inv, Real.sqrt]
@[simp]
theorem sqrt_div {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : √(x / y) = √x / √y := by
rw [division_def, sqrt_mul hx, sqrt_inv, division_def]
@[simp]
theorem sqrt_div' (x) {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 ≤ y) : √(x / y) = √x / √y := by
rw [division_def, sqrt_mul' x (inv_nonneg.2 hy), sqrt_inv, division_def]
variable {x y : ℝ}
@[simp]
theorem div_sqrt : x / √x = √x := by
rcases le_or_lt x 0 with h | h
· rw [sqrt_eq_zero'.mpr h, div_zero]
· rw [div_eq_iff (sqrt_ne_zero'.mpr h), mul_self_sqrt h.le]
theorem sqrt_div_self' : √x / x = 1 / √x := by rw [← div_sqrt, one_div_div, div_sqrt]
theorem sqrt_div_self : √x / x = (√x)⁻¹ := by rw [sqrt_div_self', one_div]
theorem lt_sqrt (hx : 0 ≤ x) : x < √y ↔ x ^ 2 < y := by
rw [← sqrt_lt_sqrt_iff (sq_nonneg _), sqrt_sq hx]
theorem sq_lt : x ^ 2 < y ↔ -√y < x ∧ x < √y := by
rw [← abs_lt, ← sq_abs, lt_sqrt (abs_nonneg _)]
theorem neg_sqrt_lt_of_sq_lt (h : x ^ 2 < y) : -√y < x :=
(sq_lt.mp h).1
theorem lt_sqrt_of_sq_lt (h : x ^ 2 < y) : x < √y :=
(sq_lt.mp h).2
theorem lt_sq_of_sqrt_lt (h : √x < y) : x < y ^ 2 := by
have hy := x.sqrt_nonneg.trans_lt h
rwa [← sqrt_lt_sqrt_iff_of_pos (sq_pos_of_pos hy), sqrt_sq hy.le]
/-- The natural square root is at most the real square root -/
theorem nat_sqrt_le_real_sqrt {a : ℕ} : ↑(Nat.sqrt a) ≤ √(a : ℝ) := by
rw [Real.le_sqrt (Nat.cast_nonneg _) (Nat.cast_nonneg _)]
norm_cast
exact Nat.sqrt_le' a
/-- The real square root is less than the natural square root plus one -/
theorem real_sqrt_lt_nat_sqrt_succ {a : ℕ} : √(a : ℝ) < Nat.sqrt a + 1 := by
rw [sqrt_lt (by simp)] <;> norm_cast
· exact Nat.lt_succ_sqrt' a
· exact Nat.le_add_left 0 (Nat.sqrt a + 1)
/-- The real square root is at most the natural square root plus one -/
theorem real_sqrt_le_nat_sqrt_succ {a : ℕ} : √(a : ℝ) ≤ Nat.sqrt a + 1 :=
real_sqrt_lt_nat_sqrt_succ.le
/-- The floor of the real square root is the same as the natural square root. -/
@[simp]
theorem floor_real_sqrt_eq_nat_sqrt {a : ℕ} : ⌊√(a : ℝ)⌋ = Nat.sqrt a := by
rw [Int.floor_eq_iff]
exact ⟨nat_sqrt_le_real_sqrt, real_sqrt_lt_nat_sqrt_succ⟩
/-- The natural floor of the real square root is the same as the natural square root. -/
@[simp]
theorem nat_floor_real_sqrt_eq_nat_sqrt {a : ℕ} : ⌊√(a : ℝ)⌋₊ = Nat.sqrt a := by
rw [Nat.floor_eq_iff (sqrt_nonneg a)]
exact ⟨nat_sqrt_le_real_sqrt, real_sqrt_lt_nat_sqrt_succ⟩
/-- Bernoulli's inequality for exponent `1 / 2`, stated using `sqrt`. -/
theorem sqrt_one_add_le (h : -1 ≤ x) : √(1 + x) ≤ 1 + x / 2 := by
refine sqrt_le_iff.mpr ⟨by linarith, ?_⟩
calc 1 + x
_ ≤ 1 + x + (x / 2) ^ 2 := le_add_of_nonneg_right <| sq_nonneg _
_ = _ := by ring
end Real
open Real
variable {α : Type*}
theorem Filter.Tendsto.sqrt {f : α → ℝ} {l : Filter α} {x : ℝ} (h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) :
Tendsto (fun x => √(f x)) l (𝓝 (√x)) :=
(continuous_sqrt.tendsto _).comp h
variable [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → ℝ} {s : Set α} {x : α}
nonrec theorem ContinuousWithinAt.sqrt (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => √(f x)) s x :=
h.sqrt
@[fun_prop]
nonrec theorem ContinuousAt.sqrt (h : ContinuousAt f x) : ContinuousAt (fun x => √(f x)) x :=
h.sqrt
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousOn.sqrt (h : ContinuousOn f s) : ContinuousOn (fun x => √(f x)) s :=
fun x hx => (h x hx).sqrt
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.sqrt (h : Continuous f) : Continuous fun x => √(f x) :=
continuous_sqrt.comp h
namespace NNReal
variable {ι : Type*}
open Finset
/-- **Cauchy-Schwarz inequality** for finsets using square roots in `ℝ≥0`. -/
lemma sum_mul_le_sqrt_mul_sqrt (s : Finset ι) (f g : ι → ℝ≥0) :
∑ i ∈ s, f i * g i ≤ sqrt (∑ i ∈ s, f i ^ 2) * sqrt (∑ i ∈ s, g i ^ 2) :=
(le_sqrt_iff_sq_le.2 <| sum_mul_sq_le_sq_mul_sq _ _ _).trans_eq <| sqrt_mul _ _
/-- **Cauchy-Schwarz inequality** for finsets using square roots in `ℝ≥0`. -/
lemma sum_sqrt_mul_sqrt_le (s : Finset ι) (f g : ι → ℝ≥0) :
∑ i ∈ s, sqrt (f i) * sqrt (g i) ≤ sqrt (∑ i ∈ s, f i) * sqrt (∑ i ∈ s, g i) := by
simpa [*] using sum_mul_le_sqrt_mul_sqrt _ (fun x ↦ sqrt (f x)) (fun x ↦ sqrt (g x))
end NNReal
namespace Real
variable {ι : Type*} {f g : ι → ℝ}
open Finset
/-- **Cauchy-Schwarz inequality** for finsets using square roots in `ℝ`. -/
lemma sum_mul_le_sqrt_mul_sqrt (s : Finset ι) (f g : ι → ℝ) :
∑ i ∈ s, f i * g i ≤ √(∑ i ∈ s, f i ^ 2) * √(∑ i ∈ s, g i ^ 2) :=
(le_sqrt_of_sq_le <| sum_mul_sq_le_sq_mul_sq _ _ _).trans_eq <| sqrt_mul
(sum_nonneg fun _ _ ↦ by positivity) _
| /-- **Cauchy-Schwarz inequality** for finsets using square roots in `ℝ`. -/
lemma sum_sqrt_mul_sqrt_le (s : Finset ι) (hf : ∀ i, 0 ≤ f i) (hg : ∀ i, 0 ≤ g i) :
∑ i ∈ s, √(f i) * √(g i) ≤ √(∑ i ∈ s, f i) * √(∑ i ∈ s, g i) := by
simpa [*] using sum_mul_le_sqrt_mul_sqrt _ (fun x ↦ √(f x)) (fun x ↦ √(g x))
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Sqrt.lean | 438 | 441 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.LinearMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.InvariantForm
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Weights.Cartan
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Weights.Linear
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.IsAlgClosed.AlgebraicClosure
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.PID
/-!
# The trace and Killing forms of a Lie algebra.
Let `L` be a Lie algebra with coefficients in a commutative ring `R`. Suppose `M` is a finite, free
`R`-module and we have a representation `φ : L → End M`. This data induces a natural bilinear form
`B` on `L`, called the trace form associated to `M`; it is defined as `B(x, y) = Tr (φ x) (φ y)`.
In the special case that `M` is `L` itself and `φ` is the adjoint representation, the trace form
is known as the Killing form.
We define the trace / Killing form in this file and prove some basic properties.
## Main definitions
* `LieModule.traceForm`: a finite, free representation of a Lie algebra `L` induces a bilinear form
on `L` called the trace Form.
* `LieModule.traceForm_eq_zero_of_isNilpotent`: the trace form induced by a nilpotent
representation of a Lie algebra vanishes.
* `killingForm`: the adjoint representation of a (finite, free) Lie algebra `L` induces a bilinear
form on `L` via the trace form construction.
-/
variable (R K L M : Type*) [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R L]
[AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [LieRingModule L M] [LieModule R L M]
local notation "φ" => LieModule.toEnd R L M
open LinearMap (trace)
open Set Module
namespace LieModule
/-- A finite, free representation of a Lie algebra `L` induces a bilinear form on `L` called
the trace Form. See also `killingForm`. -/
noncomputable def traceForm : LinearMap.BilinForm R L :=
((LinearMap.mul _ _).compl₁₂ (φ).toLinearMap (φ).toLinearMap).compr₂ (trace R M)
lemma traceForm_apply_apply (x y : L) :
traceForm R L M x y = trace R _ (φ x ∘ₗ φ y) :=
rfl
lemma traceForm_comm (x y : L) : traceForm R L M x y = traceForm R L M y x :=
LinearMap.trace_mul_comm R (φ x) (φ y)
lemma traceForm_isSymm : LinearMap.IsSymm (traceForm R L M) := LieModule.traceForm_comm R L M
@[simp] lemma traceForm_flip : LinearMap.flip (traceForm R L M) = traceForm R L M :=
Eq.symm <| LinearMap.ext₂ <| traceForm_comm R L M
/-- The trace form of a Lie module is compatible with the action of the Lie algebra.
See also `LieModule.traceForm_apply_lie_apply'`. -/
lemma traceForm_apply_lie_apply (x y z : L) :
traceForm R L M ⁅x, y⁆ z = traceForm R L M x ⁅y, z⁆ := by
calc traceForm R L M ⁅x, y⁆ z
= trace R _ (φ ⁅x, y⁆ ∘ₗ φ z) := by simp only [traceForm_apply_apply]
_ = trace R _ ((φ x * φ y - φ y * φ x) * φ z) := ?_
_ = trace R _ (φ x * (φ y * φ z)) - trace R _ (φ y * (φ x * φ z)) := ?_
_ = trace R _ (φ x * (φ y * φ z)) - trace R _ (φ x * (φ z * φ y)) := ?_
_ = traceForm R L M x ⁅y, z⁆ := ?_
· simp only [LieHom.map_lie, Ring.lie_def, ← Module.End.mul_eq_comp]
· simp only [sub_mul, mul_sub, map_sub, mul_assoc]
· simp only [LinearMap.trace_mul_cycle' R (φ x) (φ z) (φ y)]
· simp only [traceForm_apply_apply, LieHom.map_lie, Ring.lie_def, mul_sub, map_sub,
← Module.End.mul_eq_comp]
/-- Given a representation `M` of a Lie algebra `L`, the action of any `x : L` is skew-adjoint wrt
the trace form. -/
lemma traceForm_apply_lie_apply' (x y z : L) :
traceForm R L M ⁅x, y⁆ z = - traceForm R L M y ⁅x, z⁆ :=
calc traceForm R L M ⁅x, y⁆ z
= - traceForm R L M ⁅y, x⁆ z := by rw [← lie_skew x y, map_neg, LinearMap.neg_apply]
_ = - traceForm R L M y ⁅x, z⁆ := by rw [traceForm_apply_lie_apply]
lemma traceForm_lieInvariant : (traceForm R L M).lieInvariant L := by
intro x y z
rw [← lie_skew, map_neg, LinearMap.neg_apply, LieModule.traceForm_apply_lie_apply R L M]
/-- This lemma justifies the terminology "invariant" for trace forms. -/
@[simp] lemma lie_traceForm_eq_zero (x : L) : ⁅x, traceForm R L M⁆ = 0 := by
ext y z
rw [LieHom.lie_apply, LinearMap.sub_apply, Module.Dual.lie_apply, LinearMap.zero_apply,
LinearMap.zero_apply, traceForm_apply_lie_apply', sub_self]
@[simp] lemma traceForm_eq_zero_of_isNilpotent [IsReduced R] [IsNilpotent L M] :
traceForm R L M = 0 := by
ext x y
simp only [traceForm_apply_apply, LinearMap.zero_apply, ← isNilpotent_iff_eq_zero]
apply LinearMap.isNilpotent_trace_of_isNilpotent
exact isNilpotent_toEnd_of_isNilpotent₂ R L M x y
@[simp]
lemma traceForm_genWeightSpace_eq [Module.Free R M]
[IsDomain R] [IsPrincipalIdealRing R]
[LieRing.IsNilpotent L] [IsNoetherian R M] [LinearWeights R L M] (χ : L → R) (x y : L) :
traceForm R L (genWeightSpace M χ) x y = finrank R (genWeightSpace M χ) • (χ x * χ y) := by
set d := finrank R (genWeightSpace M χ)
have h₁ : χ y • d • χ x - χ y • χ x • (d : R) = 0 := by simp [mul_comm (χ x)]
have h₂ : χ x • d • χ y = d • (χ x * χ y) := by
simpa [nsmul_eq_mul, smul_eq_mul] using mul_left_comm (χ x) d (χ y)
have := traceForm_eq_zero_of_isNilpotent R L (shiftedGenWeightSpace R L M χ)
replace this := LinearMap.congr_fun (LinearMap.congr_fun this x) y
rwa [LinearMap.zero_apply, LinearMap.zero_apply, traceForm_apply_apply,
shiftedGenWeightSpace.toEnd_eq, shiftedGenWeightSpace.toEnd_eq,
← LinearEquiv.conj_comp, LinearMap.trace_conj', LinearMap.comp_sub, LinearMap.sub_comp,
LinearMap.sub_comp, map_sub, map_sub, map_sub, LinearMap.comp_smul, LinearMap.smul_comp,
LinearMap.comp_id, LinearMap.id_comp, LinearMap.map_smul, LinearMap.map_smul,
trace_toEnd_genWeightSpace, trace_toEnd_genWeightSpace,
LinearMap.comp_smul, LinearMap.smul_comp, LinearMap.id_comp, map_smul, map_smul,
LinearMap.trace_id, ← traceForm_apply_apply, h₁, h₂, sub_zero, sub_eq_zero] at this
/-- The upper and lower central series of `L` are orthogonal wrt the trace form of any Lie module
`M`. -/
lemma traceForm_eq_zero_if_mem_lcs_of_mem_ucs {x y : L} (k : ℕ)
(hx : x ∈ (⊤ : LieIdeal R L).lcs L k) (hy : y ∈ (⊥ : LieIdeal R L).ucs k) :
traceForm R L M x y = 0 := by
induction k generalizing x y with
| zero =>
replace hy : y = 0 := by simpa using hy
simp [hy]
| succ k ih =>
rw [LieSubmodule.ucs_succ, LieSubmodule.mem_normalizer] at hy
simp_rw [LieIdeal.lcs_succ, ← LieSubmodule.mem_toSubmodule,
LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span', LieSubmodule.mem_top, true_and] at hx
refine Submodule.span_induction ?_ ?_ (fun z w _ _ hz hw ↦ ?_) (fun t z _ hz ↦ ?_) hx
· rintro - ⟨z, w, hw, rfl⟩
rw [← lie_skew, map_neg, LinearMap.neg_apply, neg_eq_zero, traceForm_apply_lie_apply]
exact ih hw (hy _)
· simp
· simp [hz, hw]
· simp [hz]
lemma traceForm_apply_eq_zero_of_mem_lcs_of_mem_center {x y : L}
(hx : x ∈ lowerCentralSeries R L L 1) (hy : y ∈ LieAlgebra.center R L) :
traceForm R L M x y = 0 := by
apply traceForm_eq_zero_if_mem_lcs_of_mem_ucs R L M 1
· simpa using hx
· simpa using hy
-- This is barely worth having: it usually follows from `LieModule.traceForm_eq_zero_of_isNilpotent`
@[simp] lemma traceForm_eq_zero_of_isTrivial [IsTrivial L M] :
traceForm R L M = 0 := by
ext x y
suffices φ x ∘ₗ φ y = 0 by simp [traceForm_apply_apply, this]
ext m
simp
/-- Given a bilinear form `B` on a representation `M` of a nilpotent Lie algebra `L`, if `B` is
invariant (in the sense that the action of `L` is skew-adjoint wrt `B`) then components of the
Fitting decomposition of `M` are orthogonal wrt `B`. -/
lemma eq_zero_of_mem_genWeightSpace_mem_posFitting [LieRing.IsNilpotent L]
{B : LinearMap.BilinForm R M} (hB : ∀ (x : L) (m n : M), B ⁅x, m⁆ n = - B m ⁅x, n⁆)
{m₀ m₁ : M} (hm₀ : m₀ ∈ genWeightSpace M (0 : L → R)) (hm₁ : m₁ ∈ posFittingComp R L M) :
B m₀ m₁ = 0 := by
replace hB : ∀ x (k : ℕ) m n, B m ((φ x ^ k) n) = (- 1 : R) ^ k • B ((φ x ^ k) m) n := by
intro x k
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih =>
intro m n
replace hB : ∀ m, B m (φ x n) = (- 1 : R) • B (φ x m) n := by simp [hB]
have : (-1 : R) ^ k • (-1 : R) = (-1 : R) ^ (k + 1) := by rw [pow_succ (-1 : R), smul_eq_mul]
conv_lhs => rw [pow_succ, Module.End.mul_eq_comp, LinearMap.comp_apply, ih, hB,
← (φ x).comp_apply, ← Module.End.mul_eq_comp, ← pow_succ', ← smul_assoc, this]
suffices ∀ (x : L) m, m ∈ posFittingCompOf R M x → B m₀ m = 0 by
refine LieSubmodule.iSup_induction (motive := fun m ↦ (B m₀) m = 0) _ hm₁ this (map_zero _) ?_
aesop
clear hm₁ m₁; intro x m₁ hm₁
simp only [mem_genWeightSpace, Pi.zero_apply, zero_smul, sub_zero] at hm₀
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := hm₀ x
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ := (mem_posFittingCompOf R x m₁).mp hm₁ k
simp [hB, hk]
lemma trace_toEnd_eq_zero_of_mem_lcs
{k : ℕ} {x : L} (hk : 1 ≤ k) (hx : x ∈ lowerCentralSeries R L L k) :
trace R _ (toEnd R L M x) = 0 := by
replace hx : x ∈ lowerCentralSeries R L L 1 := antitone_lowerCentralSeries _ _ _ hk hx
replace hx : x ∈ Submodule.span R {m | ∃ u v : L, ⁅u, v⁆ = m} := by
rw [lowerCentralSeries_succ, ← LieSubmodule.mem_toSubmodule,
LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span'] at hx
simpa using hx
refine Submodule.span_induction (p := fun x _ ↦ trace R _ (toEnd R L M x) = 0)
?_ ?_ (fun u v _ _ hu hv ↦ ?_) (fun t u _ hu ↦ ?_) hx
· intro y ⟨u, v, huv⟩
simp [← huv]
· simp
· simp [hu, hv]
· simp [hu]
@[simp]
lemma traceForm_lieSubalgebra_mk_left (L' : LieSubalgebra R L) {x : L} (hx : x ∈ L') (y : L') :
traceForm R L' M ⟨x, hx⟩ y = traceForm R L M x y :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma traceForm_lieSubalgebra_mk_right (L' : LieSubalgebra R L) {x : L'} {y : L} (hy : y ∈ L') :
traceForm R L' M x ⟨y, hy⟩ = traceForm R L M x y :=
rfl
open TensorProduct
variable [LieRing.IsNilpotent L] [IsDomain R] [IsPrincipalIdealRing R]
lemma traceForm_eq_sum_genWeightSpaceOf
[NoZeroSMulDivisors R M] [IsNoetherian R M] [IsTriangularizable R L M] (z : L) :
traceForm R L M =
∑ χ ∈ (finite_genWeightSpaceOf_ne_bot R L M z).toFinset,
traceForm R L (genWeightSpaceOf M χ z) := by
ext x y
have hxy : ∀ χ : R, MapsTo ((toEnd R L M x).comp (toEnd R L M y))
(genWeightSpaceOf M χ z) (genWeightSpaceOf M χ z) :=
fun χ m hm ↦ LieSubmodule.lie_mem _ <| LieSubmodule.lie_mem _ hm
have hfin : {χ : R | (genWeightSpaceOf M χ z : Submodule R M) ≠ ⊥}.Finite := by
convert finite_genWeightSpaceOf_ne_bot R L M z
exact LieSubmodule.toSubmodule_eq_bot (genWeightSpaceOf M _ _)
classical
have h := LieSubmodule.iSupIndep_toSubmodule.mpr <| iSupIndep_genWeightSpaceOf R L M z
have hds := DirectSum.isInternal_submodule_of_iSupIndep_of_iSup_eq_top h <| by
simp [← LieSubmodule.iSup_toSubmodule]
simp only [LinearMap.coeFn_sum, Finset.sum_apply, traceForm_apply_apply,
LinearMap.trace_eq_sum_trace_restrict' hds hfin hxy]
exact Finset.sum_congr (by simp) (fun χ _ ↦ rfl)
-- In characteristic zero (or even just `LinearWeights R L M`) a stronger result holds (no
-- `⊓ LieAlgebra.center R L`) TODO prove this using `LieModule.traceForm_eq_sum_finrank_nsmul_mul`.
lemma lowerCentralSeries_one_inf_center_le_ker_traceForm [Module.Free R M] [Module.Finite R M] :
lowerCentralSeries R L L 1 ⊓ LieAlgebra.center R L ≤ LinearMap.ker (traceForm R L M) := by
/- Sketch of proof (due to Zassenhaus):
Let `z ∈ lowerCentralSeries R L L 1 ⊓ LieAlgebra.center R L` and `x : L`. We must show that
`trace (φ x ∘ φ z) = 0` where `φ z : End R M` indicates the action of `z` on `M` (and likewise
for `φ x`).
Because `z` belongs to the indicated intersection, it has two key properties:
(a) the trace of the action of `z` vanishes on any Lie module of `L`
(see `LieModule.trace_toEnd_eq_zero_of_mem_lcs`),
(b) `z` commutes with all elements of `L`.
If `φ x` were triangularizable, we could write `M` as a direct sum of generalized eigenspaces of
`φ x`. Because `L` is nilpotent these are all Lie submodules, thus Lie modules in their own right,
and thus by (a) above we learn that `trace (φ z) = 0` restricted to each generalized eigenspace.
Because `z` commutes with `x`, this forces `trace (φ x ∘ φ z) = 0` on each generalized eigenspace,
and so by summing the traces on each generalized eigenspace we learn the total trace is zero, as
required (see `LinearMap.trace_comp_eq_zero_of_commute_of_trace_restrict_eq_zero`).
To cater for the fact that `φ x` may not be triangularizable, we first extend the scalars from `R`
to `AlgebraicClosure (FractionRing R)` and argue using the action of `A ⊗ L` on `A ⊗ M`. -/
rintro z ⟨hz : z ∈ lowerCentralSeries R L L 1, hzc : z ∈ LieAlgebra.center R L⟩
ext x
rw [traceForm_apply_apply, LinearMap.zero_apply]
let A := AlgebraicClosure (FractionRing R)
suffices algebraMap R A (trace R _ ((φ z).comp (φ x))) = 0 by
have _i : NoZeroSMulDivisors R A := NoZeroSMulDivisors.trans_faithfulSMul R (FractionRing R) A
rw [← map_zero (algebraMap R A)] at this
exact FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective R A this
rw [← LinearMap.trace_baseChange, LinearMap.baseChange_comp, ← toEnd_baseChange,
← toEnd_baseChange]
replace hz : 1 ⊗ₜ z ∈ lowerCentralSeries A (A ⊗[R] L) (A ⊗[R] L) 1 := by
simp only [lowerCentralSeries_succ, lowerCentralSeries_zero] at hz ⊢
rw [← LieSubmodule.baseChange_top, ← LieSubmodule.lie_baseChange]
exact Submodule.tmul_mem_baseChange_of_mem 1 hz
replace hzc : 1 ⊗ₜ[R] z ∈ LieAlgebra.center A (A ⊗[R] L) := by
simp only [mem_maxTrivSubmodule] at hzc ⊢
intro y
exact y.induction_on rfl (fun a u ↦ by simp [hzc u])
(fun u v hu hv ↦ by simp [A, hu, hv])
apply LinearMap.trace_comp_eq_zero_of_commute_of_trace_restrict_eq_zero
· exact IsTriangularizable.maxGenEigenspace_eq_top (1 ⊗ₜ[R] x)
· exact fun μ ↦ trace_toEnd_eq_zero_of_mem_lcs A (A ⊗[R] L)
(genWeightSpaceOf (A ⊗[R] M) μ ((1:A) ⊗ₜ[R] x)) (le_refl 1) hz
· exact commute_toEnd_of_mem_center_right (A ⊗[R] M) hzc (1 ⊗ₜ x)
/-- A nilpotent Lie algebra with a representation whose trace form is non-singular is Abelian. -/
lemma isLieAbelian_of_ker_traceForm_eq_bot [Module.Free R M] [Module.Finite R M]
(h : LinearMap.ker (traceForm R L M) = ⊥) : IsLieAbelian L := by
simpa only [← disjoint_lowerCentralSeries_maxTrivSubmodule_iff R L L, disjoint_iff_inf_le,
LieIdeal.toLieSubalgebra_toSubmodule, LieSubmodule.toSubmodule_eq_bot, h]
using lowerCentralSeries_one_inf_center_le_ker_traceForm R L M
end LieModule
namespace LieSubmodule
| open LieModule (traceForm)
variable {R L M}
variable [Module.Free R M] [Module.Finite R M]
variable [IsDomain R] [IsPrincipalIdealRing R]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/TraceForm.lean | 296 | 300 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Continuous
import Mathlib.Topology.Defs.Induced
/-!
# Ordering on topologies and (co)induced topologies
Topologies on a fixed type `α` are ordered, by reverse inclusion. That is, for topologies `t₁` and
`t₂` on `α`, we write `t₁ ≤ t₂` if every set open in `t₂` is also open in `t₁`. (One also calls
`t₁` *finer* than `t₂`, and `t₂` *coarser* than `t₁`.)
Any function `f : α → β` induces
* `TopologicalSpace.induced f : TopologicalSpace β → TopologicalSpace α`;
* `TopologicalSpace.coinduced f : TopologicalSpace α → TopologicalSpace β`.
Continuity, the ordering on topologies and (co)induced topologies are related as follows:
* The identity map `(α, t₁) → (α, t₂)` is continuous iff `t₁ ≤ t₂`.
* A map `f : (α, t) → (β, u)` is continuous
* iff `t ≤ TopologicalSpace.induced f u` (`continuous_iff_le_induced`)
* iff `TopologicalSpace.coinduced f t ≤ u` (`continuous_iff_coinduced_le`).
Topologies on `α` form a complete lattice, with `⊥` the discrete topology and `⊤` the indiscrete
topology.
For a function `f : α → β`, `(TopologicalSpace.coinduced f, TopologicalSpace.induced f)` is a Galois
connection between topologies on `α` and topologies on `β`.
## Implementation notes
There is a Galois insertion between topologies on `α` (with the inclusion ordering) and all
collections of sets in `α`. The complete lattice structure on topologies on `α` is defined as the
reverse of the one obtained via this Galois insertion. More precisely, we use the corresponding
Galois coinsertion between topologies on `α` (with the reversed inclusion ordering) and collections
of sets in `α` (with the reversed inclusion ordering).
## Tags
finer, coarser, induced topology, coinduced topology
-/
open Function Set Filter Topology
universe u v w
namespace TopologicalSpace
variable {α : Type u}
/-- The open sets of the least topology containing a collection of basic sets. -/
inductive GenerateOpen (g : Set (Set α)) : Set α → Prop
| basic : ∀ s ∈ g, GenerateOpen g s
| univ : GenerateOpen g univ
| inter : ∀ s t, GenerateOpen g s → GenerateOpen g t → GenerateOpen g (s ∩ t)
| sUnion : ∀ S : Set (Set α), (∀ s ∈ S, GenerateOpen g s) → GenerateOpen g (⋃₀ S)
/-- The smallest topological space containing the collection `g` of basic sets -/
def generateFrom (g : Set (Set α)) : TopologicalSpace α where
IsOpen := GenerateOpen g
isOpen_univ := GenerateOpen.univ
isOpen_inter := GenerateOpen.inter
isOpen_sUnion := GenerateOpen.sUnion
theorem isOpen_generateFrom_of_mem {g : Set (Set α)} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ g) :
IsOpen[generateFrom g] s :=
GenerateOpen.basic s hs
theorem nhds_generateFrom {g : Set (Set α)} {a : α} :
@nhds α (generateFrom g) a = ⨅ s ∈ { s | a ∈ s ∧ s ∈ g }, 𝓟 s := by
letI := generateFrom g
rw [nhds_def]
refine le_antisymm (biInf_mono fun s ⟨as, sg⟩ => ⟨as, .basic _ sg⟩) <| le_iInf₂ ?_
rintro s ⟨ha, hs⟩
induction hs with
| basic _ hs => exact iInf₂_le _ ⟨ha, hs⟩
| univ => exact le_top.trans_eq principal_univ.symm
| inter _ _ _ _ hs ht => exact (le_inf (hs ha.1) (ht ha.2)).trans_eq inf_principal
| sUnion _ _ hS =>
let ⟨t, htS, hat⟩ := ha
exact (hS t htS hat).trans (principal_mono.2 <| subset_sUnion_of_mem htS)
lemma tendsto_nhds_generateFrom_iff {β : Type*} {m : α → β} {f : Filter α} {g : Set (Set β)}
{b : β} : Tendsto m f (@nhds β (generateFrom g) b) ↔ ∀ s ∈ g, b ∈ s → m ⁻¹' s ∈ f := by
simp only [nhds_generateFrom, @forall_swap (b ∈ _), tendsto_iInf, mem_setOf_eq, and_imp,
tendsto_principal]; rfl
/-- Construct a topology on α given the filter of neighborhoods of each point of α. -/
protected def mkOfNhds (n : α → Filter α) : TopologicalSpace α where
IsOpen s := ∀ a ∈ s, s ∈ n a
isOpen_univ _ _ := univ_mem
isOpen_inter := fun _s _t hs ht x ⟨hxs, hxt⟩ => inter_mem (hs x hxs) (ht x hxt)
isOpen_sUnion := fun _s hs _a ⟨x, hx, hxa⟩ =>
mem_of_superset (hs x hx _ hxa) (subset_sUnion_of_mem hx)
theorem nhds_mkOfNhds_of_hasBasis {n : α → Filter α} {ι : α → Sort*} {p : ∀ a, ι a → Prop}
{s : ∀ a, ι a → Set α} (hb : ∀ a, (n a).HasBasis (p a) (s a))
(hpure : ∀ a i, p a i → a ∈ s a i) (hopen : ∀ a i, p a i → ∀ᶠ x in n a, s a i ∈ n x) (a : α) :
@nhds α (.mkOfNhds n) a = n a := by
let t : TopologicalSpace α := .mkOfNhds n
apply le_antisymm
· intro U hU
replace hpure : pure ≤ n := fun x ↦ (hb x).ge_iff.2 (hpure x)
refine mem_nhds_iff.2 ⟨{x | U ∈ n x}, fun x hx ↦ hpure x hx, fun x hx ↦ ?_, hU⟩
rcases (hb x).mem_iff.1 hx with ⟨i, hpi, hi⟩
exact (hopen x i hpi).mono fun y hy ↦ mem_of_superset hy hi
· exact (nhds_basis_opens a).ge_iff.2 fun U ⟨haU, hUo⟩ ↦ hUo a haU
theorem nhds_mkOfNhds (n : α → Filter α) (a : α) (h₀ : pure ≤ n)
(h₁ : ∀ a, ∀ s ∈ n a, ∀ᶠ y in n a, s ∈ n y) :
@nhds α (TopologicalSpace.mkOfNhds n) a = n a :=
nhds_mkOfNhds_of_hasBasis (fun a ↦ (n a).basis_sets) h₀ h₁ _
theorem nhds_mkOfNhds_single [DecidableEq α] {a₀ : α} {l : Filter α} (h : pure a₀ ≤ l) (b : α) :
@nhds α (TopologicalSpace.mkOfNhds (update pure a₀ l)) b =
(update pure a₀ l : α → Filter α) b := by
refine nhds_mkOfNhds _ _ (le_update_iff.mpr ⟨h, fun _ _ => le_rfl⟩) fun a s hs => ?_
rcases eq_or_ne a a₀ with (rfl | ha)
· filter_upwards [hs] with b hb
rcases eq_or_ne b a with (rfl | hb)
· exact hs
· rwa [update_of_ne hb]
· simpa only [update_of_ne ha, mem_pure, eventually_pure] using hs
theorem nhds_mkOfNhds_filterBasis (B : α → FilterBasis α) (a : α) (h₀ : ∀ x, ∀ n ∈ B x, x ∈ n)
(h₁ : ∀ x, ∀ n ∈ B x, ∃ n₁ ∈ B x, ∀ x' ∈ n₁, ∃ n₂ ∈ B x', n₂ ⊆ n) :
@nhds α (TopologicalSpace.mkOfNhds fun x => (B x).filter) a = (B a).filter :=
nhds_mkOfNhds_of_hasBasis (fun a ↦ (B a).hasBasis) h₀ h₁ a
section Lattice
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
/-- The ordering on topologies on the type `α`. `t ≤ s` if every set open in `s` is also open in `t`
(`t` is finer than `s`). -/
instance : PartialOrder (TopologicalSpace α) :=
{ PartialOrder.lift (fun t => OrderDual.toDual IsOpen[t]) (fun _ _ => TopologicalSpace.ext) with
le := fun s t => ∀ U, IsOpen[t] U → IsOpen[s] U }
protected theorem le_def {α} {t s : TopologicalSpace α} : t ≤ s ↔ IsOpen[s] ≤ IsOpen[t] :=
Iff.rfl
theorem le_generateFrom_iff_subset_isOpen {g : Set (Set α)} {t : TopologicalSpace α} :
t ≤ generateFrom g ↔ g ⊆ { s | IsOpen[t] s } :=
⟨fun ht s hs => ht _ <| .basic s hs, fun hg _s hs =>
hs.recOn (fun _ h => hg h) isOpen_univ (fun _ _ _ _ => IsOpen.inter) fun _ _ => isOpen_sUnion⟩
/-- If `s` equals the collection of open sets in the topology it generates, then `s` defines a
topology. -/
protected def mkOfClosure (s : Set (Set α)) (hs : { u | GenerateOpen s u } = s) :
TopologicalSpace α where
IsOpen u := u ∈ s
isOpen_univ := hs ▸ TopologicalSpace.GenerateOpen.univ
isOpen_inter := hs ▸ TopologicalSpace.GenerateOpen.inter
isOpen_sUnion := hs ▸ TopologicalSpace.GenerateOpen.sUnion
theorem mkOfClosure_sets {s : Set (Set α)} {hs : { u | GenerateOpen s u } = s} :
TopologicalSpace.mkOfClosure s hs = generateFrom s :=
TopologicalSpace.ext hs.symm
theorem gc_generateFrom (α) :
GaloisConnection (fun t : TopologicalSpace α => OrderDual.toDual { s | IsOpen[t] s })
(generateFrom ∘ OrderDual.ofDual) := fun _ _ =>
le_generateFrom_iff_subset_isOpen.symm
/-- The Galois coinsertion between `TopologicalSpace α` and `(Set (Set α))ᵒᵈ` whose lower part sends
a topology to its collection of open subsets, and whose upper part sends a collection of subsets
of `α` to the topology they generate. -/
def gciGenerateFrom (α : Type*) :
GaloisCoinsertion (fun t : TopologicalSpace α => OrderDual.toDual { s | IsOpen[t] s })
(generateFrom ∘ OrderDual.ofDual) where
gc := gc_generateFrom α
u_l_le _ s hs := TopologicalSpace.GenerateOpen.basic s hs
choice g hg := TopologicalSpace.mkOfClosure g
(Subset.antisymm hg <| le_generateFrom_iff_subset_isOpen.1 <| le_rfl)
choice_eq _ _ := mkOfClosure_sets
/-- Topologies on `α` form a complete lattice, with `⊥` the discrete topology
and `⊤` the indiscrete topology. The infimum of a collection of topologies
is the topology generated by all their open sets, while the supremum is the
topology whose open sets are those sets open in every member of the collection. -/
instance : CompleteLattice (TopologicalSpace α) := (gciGenerateFrom α).liftCompleteLattice
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem generateFrom_anti {α} {g₁ g₂ : Set (Set α)} (h : g₁ ⊆ g₂) :
generateFrom g₂ ≤ generateFrom g₁ :=
(gc_generateFrom _).monotone_u h
theorem generateFrom_setOf_isOpen (t : TopologicalSpace α) :
generateFrom { s | IsOpen[t] s } = t :=
(gciGenerateFrom α).u_l_eq t
theorem leftInverse_generateFrom :
LeftInverse generateFrom fun t : TopologicalSpace α => { s | IsOpen[t] s } :=
(gciGenerateFrom α).u_l_leftInverse
theorem generateFrom_surjective : Surjective (generateFrom : Set (Set α) → TopologicalSpace α) :=
(gciGenerateFrom α).u_surjective
theorem setOf_isOpen_injective : Injective fun t : TopologicalSpace α => { s | IsOpen[t] s } :=
(gciGenerateFrom α).l_injective
end Lattice
end TopologicalSpace
section Lattice
variable {α : Type*} {t t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace α} {s : Set α}
theorem IsOpen.mono (hs : IsOpen[t₂] s) (h : t₁ ≤ t₂) : IsOpen[t₁] s := h s hs
theorem IsClosed.mono (hs : IsClosed[t₂] s) (h : t₁ ≤ t₂) : IsClosed[t₁] s :=
(@isOpen_compl_iff α s t₁).mp <| hs.isOpen_compl.mono h
theorem closure.mono (h : t₁ ≤ t₂) : closure[t₁] s ⊆ closure[t₂] s :=
@closure_minimal _ t₁ s (@closure _ t₂ s) subset_closure (IsClosed.mono isClosed_closure h)
theorem isOpen_implies_isOpen_iff : (∀ s, IsOpen[t₁] s → IsOpen[t₂] s) ↔ t₂ ≤ t₁ :=
Iff.rfl
/-- The only open sets in the indiscrete topology are the empty set and the whole space. -/
theorem TopologicalSpace.isOpen_top_iff {α} (U : Set α) : IsOpen[⊤] U ↔ U = ∅ ∨ U = univ :=
⟨fun h => by
induction h with
| basic _ h => exact False.elim h
| univ => exact .inr rfl
| inter _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ =>
rcases h₁ with (rfl | rfl) <;> rcases h₂ with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp
| sUnion _ _ ih => exact sUnion_mem_empty_univ ih, by
rintro (rfl | rfl)
exacts [@isOpen_empty _ ⊤, @isOpen_univ _ ⊤]⟩
/-- A topological space is discrete if every set is open, that is,
its topology equals the discrete topology `⊥`. -/
class DiscreteTopology (α : Type*) [t : TopologicalSpace α] : Prop where
/-- The `TopologicalSpace` structure on a type with discrete topology is equal to `⊥`. -/
eq_bot : t = ⊥
theorem discreteTopology_bot (α : Type*) : @DiscreteTopology α ⊥ :=
@DiscreteTopology.mk α ⊥ rfl
section DiscreteTopology
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [DiscreteTopology α] {β : Type*}
@[simp]
theorem isOpen_discrete (s : Set α) : IsOpen s := (@DiscreteTopology.eq_bot α _).symm ▸ trivial
@[simp] theorem isClosed_discrete (s : Set α) : IsClosed s := ⟨isOpen_discrete _⟩
theorem closure_discrete (s : Set α) : closure s = s := (isClosed_discrete _).closure_eq
@[simp] theorem dense_discrete {s : Set α} : Dense s ↔ s = univ := by simp [dense_iff_closure_eq]
@[simp]
theorem denseRange_discrete {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α} : DenseRange f ↔ Surjective f := by
rw [DenseRange, dense_discrete, range_eq_univ]
@[nontriviality, continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_of_discreteTopology [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} : Continuous f :=
continuous_def.2 fun _ _ => isOpen_discrete _
/-- A function to a discrete topological space is continuous if and only if the preimage of every
singleton is open. -/
theorem continuous_discrete_rng {α} [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β] [DiscreteTopology β]
{f : α → β} : Continuous f ↔ ∀ b : β, IsOpen (f ⁻¹' {b}) :=
⟨fun h _ => (isOpen_discrete _).preimage h, fun h => ⟨fun s _ => by
rw [← biUnion_of_singleton s, preimage_iUnion₂]
exact isOpen_biUnion fun _ _ => h _⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem nhds_discrete (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] [DiscreteTopology α] : @nhds α _ = pure :=
le_antisymm (fun _ s hs => (isOpen_discrete s).mem_nhds hs) pure_le_nhds
theorem mem_nhds_discrete {x : α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ x ∈ s := by rw [nhds_discrete, mem_pure]
end DiscreteTopology
theorem le_of_nhds_le_nhds (h : ∀ x, @nhds α t₁ x ≤ @nhds α t₂ x) : t₁ ≤ t₂ := fun s => by
rw [@isOpen_iff_mem_nhds _ t₁, @isOpen_iff_mem_nhds _ t₂]
exact fun hs a ha => h _ (hs _ ha)
theorem eq_bot_of_singletons_open {t : TopologicalSpace α} (h : ∀ x, IsOpen[t] {x}) : t = ⊥ :=
bot_unique fun s _ => biUnion_of_singleton s ▸ isOpen_biUnion fun x _ => h x
theorem forall_open_iff_discrete {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] :
(∀ s : Set X, IsOpen s) ↔ DiscreteTopology X :=
⟨fun h => ⟨eq_bot_of_singletons_open fun _ => h _⟩, @isOpen_discrete _ _⟩
theorem discreteTopology_iff_forall_isClosed [TopologicalSpace α] :
DiscreteTopology α ↔ ∀ s : Set α, IsClosed s :=
forall_open_iff_discrete.symm.trans <| compl_surjective.forall.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ ↦
isOpen_compl_iff
theorem singletons_open_iff_discrete {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] :
(∀ a : X, IsOpen ({a} : Set X)) ↔ DiscreteTopology X :=
⟨fun h => ⟨eq_bot_of_singletons_open h⟩, fun a _ => @isOpen_discrete _ _ a _⟩
theorem DiscreteTopology.of_finite_of_isClosed_singleton [TopologicalSpace α] [Finite α]
(h : ∀ a : α, IsClosed {a}) : DiscreteTopology α :=
discreteTopology_iff_forall_isClosed.mpr fun s ↦
s.iUnion_of_singleton_coe ▸ isClosed_iUnion_of_finite fun _ ↦ h _
theorem discreteTopology_iff_singleton_mem_nhds [TopologicalSpace α] :
DiscreteTopology α ↔ ∀ x : α, {x} ∈ 𝓝 x := by
simp only [← singletons_open_iff_discrete, isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, mem_singleton_iff, forall_eq]
/-- This lemma characterizes discrete topological spaces as those whose singletons are
neighbourhoods. -/
theorem discreteTopology_iff_nhds [TopologicalSpace α] :
DiscreteTopology α ↔ ∀ x : α, 𝓝 x = pure x := by
simp [discreteTopology_iff_singleton_mem_nhds, le_pure_iff]
apply forall_congr' (fun x ↦ ?_)
simp [le_antisymm_iff, pure_le_nhds x]
theorem discreteTopology_iff_nhds_ne [TopologicalSpace α] :
DiscreteTopology α ↔ ∀ x : α, 𝓝[≠] x = ⊥ := by
simp only [discreteTopology_iff_singleton_mem_nhds, nhdsWithin, inf_principal_eq_bot, compl_compl]
/-- If the codomain of a continuous injective function has discrete topology,
then so does the domain.
See also `Embedding.discreteTopology` for an important special case. -/
theorem DiscreteTopology.of_continuous_injective
{β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β] [DiscreteTopology β] {f : α → β}
(hc : Continuous f) (hinj : Injective f) : DiscreteTopology α :=
forall_open_iff_discrete.1 fun s ↦ hinj.preimage_image s ▸ (isOpen_discrete _).preimage hc
end Lattice
section GaloisConnection
variable {α β γ : Type*}
theorem isOpen_induced_iff [t : TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α} {f : α → β} :
IsOpen[t.induced f] s ↔ ∃ t, IsOpen t ∧ f ⁻¹' t = s :=
Iff.rfl
theorem isClosed_induced_iff [t : TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α} {f : α → β} :
IsClosed[t.induced f] s ↔ ∃ t, IsClosed t ∧ f ⁻¹' t = s := by
letI := t.induced f
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_induced_iff]
exact compl_surjective.exists.trans (by simp only [preimage_compl, compl_inj_iff])
theorem isOpen_coinduced {t : TopologicalSpace α} {s : Set β} {f : α → β} :
IsOpen[t.coinduced f] s ↔ IsOpen (f ⁻¹' s) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem isClosed_coinduced {t : TopologicalSpace α} {s : Set β} {f : α → β} :
IsClosed[t.coinduced f] s ↔ IsClosed (f ⁻¹' s) := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_coinduced (f := f), preimage_compl]
theorem preimage_nhds_coinduced [TopologicalSpace α] {π : α → β} {s : Set β} {a : α}
(hs : s ∈ @nhds β (TopologicalSpace.coinduced π ‹_›) (π a)) : π ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝 a := by
letI := TopologicalSpace.coinduced π ‹_›
rcases mem_nhds_iff.mp hs with ⟨V, hVs, V_op, mem_V⟩
exact mem_nhds_iff.mpr ⟨π ⁻¹' V, Set.preimage_mono hVs, V_op, mem_V⟩
variable {t t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace α} {t' : TopologicalSpace β} {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
theorem Continuous.coinduced_le (h : Continuous[t, t'] f) : t.coinduced f ≤ t' :=
(@continuous_def α β t t').1 h
theorem coinduced_le_iff_le_induced {f : α → β} {tα : TopologicalSpace α}
{tβ : TopologicalSpace β} : tα.coinduced f ≤ tβ ↔ tα ≤ tβ.induced f :=
⟨fun h _s ⟨_t, ht, hst⟩ => hst ▸ h _ ht, fun h s hs => h _ ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩⟩
theorem Continuous.le_induced (h : Continuous[t, t'] f) : t ≤ t'.induced f :=
coinduced_le_iff_le_induced.1 h.coinduced_le
theorem gc_coinduced_induced (f : α → β) :
GaloisConnection (TopologicalSpace.coinduced f) (TopologicalSpace.induced f) := fun _ _ =>
coinduced_le_iff_le_induced
theorem induced_mono (h : t₁ ≤ t₂) : t₁.induced g ≤ t₂.induced g :=
(gc_coinduced_induced g).monotone_u h
theorem coinduced_mono (h : t₁ ≤ t₂) : t₁.coinduced f ≤ t₂.coinduced f :=
(gc_coinduced_induced f).monotone_l h
@[simp]
theorem induced_top : (⊤ : TopologicalSpace α).induced g = ⊤ :=
(gc_coinduced_induced g).u_top
@[simp]
theorem induced_inf : (t₁ ⊓ t₂).induced g = t₁.induced g ⊓ t₂.induced g :=
(gc_coinduced_induced g).u_inf
@[simp]
theorem induced_iInf {ι : Sort w} {t : ι → TopologicalSpace α} :
(⨅ i, t i).induced g = ⨅ i, (t i).induced g :=
(gc_coinduced_induced g).u_iInf
@[simp]
theorem induced_sInf {s : Set (TopologicalSpace α)} :
TopologicalSpace.induced g (sInf s) = sInf (TopologicalSpace.induced g '' s) := by
rw [sInf_eq_iInf', sInf_image', induced_iInf]
@[simp]
theorem coinduced_bot : (⊥ : TopologicalSpace α).coinduced f = ⊥ :=
(gc_coinduced_induced f).l_bot
@[simp]
theorem coinduced_sup : (t₁ ⊔ t₂).coinduced f = t₁.coinduced f ⊔ t₂.coinduced f :=
(gc_coinduced_induced f).l_sup
@[simp]
theorem coinduced_iSup {ι : Sort w} {t : ι → TopologicalSpace α} :
(⨆ i, t i).coinduced f = ⨆ i, (t i).coinduced f :=
(gc_coinduced_induced f).l_iSup
@[simp]
theorem coinduced_sSup {s : Set (TopologicalSpace α)} :
TopologicalSpace.coinduced f (sSup s) = sSup ((TopologicalSpace.coinduced f) '' s) := by
rw [sSup_eq_iSup', sSup_image', coinduced_iSup]
theorem induced_id [t : TopologicalSpace α] : t.induced id = t :=
TopologicalSpace.ext <|
funext fun s => propext <| ⟨fun ⟨_, hs, h⟩ => h ▸ hs, fun hs => ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩⟩
theorem induced_compose {tγ : TopologicalSpace γ} {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} :
(tγ.induced g).induced f = tγ.induced (g ∘ f) :=
TopologicalSpace.ext <|
funext fun _ => propext
⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨s, hs, h₂⟩, h₁⟩ => h₁ ▸ h₂ ▸ ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩,
fun ⟨s, hs, h⟩ => ⟨preimage g s, ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩, h ▸ rfl⟩⟩
theorem induced_const [t : TopologicalSpace α] {x : α} : (t.induced fun _ : β => x) = ⊤ :=
le_antisymm le_top (@continuous_const β α ⊤ t x).le_induced
theorem coinduced_id [t : TopologicalSpace α] : t.coinduced id = t :=
TopologicalSpace.ext rfl
theorem coinduced_compose [tα : TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} :
(tα.coinduced f).coinduced g = tα.coinduced (g ∘ f) :=
TopologicalSpace.ext rfl
theorem Equiv.induced_symm {α β : Type*} (e : α ≃ β) :
TopologicalSpace.induced e.symm = TopologicalSpace.coinduced e := by
ext t U
rw [isOpen_induced_iff, isOpen_coinduced]
simp only [e.symm.preimage_eq_iff_eq_image, exists_eq_right, ← preimage_equiv_eq_image_symm]
theorem Equiv.coinduced_symm {α β : Type*} (e : α ≃ β) :
TopologicalSpace.coinduced e.symm = TopologicalSpace.induced e :=
e.symm.induced_symm.symm
end GaloisConnection
-- constructions using the complete lattice structure
section Constructions
open TopologicalSpace
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
instance inhabitedTopologicalSpace {α : Type u} : Inhabited (TopologicalSpace α) :=
⟨⊥⟩
instance (priority := 100) Subsingleton.uniqueTopologicalSpace [Subsingleton α] :
Unique (TopologicalSpace α) where
default := ⊥
uniq t :=
eq_bot_of_singletons_open fun x =>
Subsingleton.set_cases (@isOpen_empty _ t) (@isOpen_univ _ t) ({x} : Set α)
instance (priority := 100) Subsingleton.discreteTopology [t : TopologicalSpace α] [Subsingleton α] :
DiscreteTopology α :=
⟨Unique.eq_default t⟩
instance : TopologicalSpace Empty := ⊥
instance : DiscreteTopology Empty := ⟨rfl⟩
instance : TopologicalSpace PEmpty := ⊥
instance : DiscreteTopology PEmpty := ⟨rfl⟩
instance : TopologicalSpace PUnit := ⊥
instance : DiscreteTopology PUnit := ⟨rfl⟩
instance : TopologicalSpace Bool := ⊥
instance : DiscreteTopology Bool := ⟨rfl⟩
instance : TopologicalSpace ℕ := ⊥
instance : DiscreteTopology ℕ := ⟨rfl⟩
instance : TopologicalSpace ℤ := ⊥
instance : DiscreteTopology ℤ := ⟨rfl⟩
instance {n} : TopologicalSpace (Fin n) := ⊥
instance {n} : DiscreteTopology (Fin n) := ⟨rfl⟩
instance sierpinskiSpace : TopologicalSpace Prop :=
generateFrom {{True}}
/-- See also `continuous_of_discreteTopology`, which works for `IsEmpty α`. -/
theorem continuous_empty_function [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β] [IsEmpty β]
(f : α → β) : Continuous f :=
letI := Function.isEmpty f
continuous_of_discreteTopology
theorem le_generateFrom {t : TopologicalSpace α} {g : Set (Set α)} (h : ∀ s ∈ g, IsOpen s) :
t ≤ generateFrom g :=
le_generateFrom_iff_subset_isOpen.2 h
theorem induced_generateFrom_eq {α β} {b : Set (Set β)} {f : α → β} :
(generateFrom b).induced f = generateFrom (preimage f '' b) :=
le_antisymm (le_generateFrom <| forall_mem_image.2 fun s hs => ⟨s, GenerateOpen.basic _ hs, rfl⟩)
(coinduced_le_iff_le_induced.1 <| le_generateFrom fun _s hs => .basic _ (mem_image_of_mem _ hs))
theorem le_induced_generateFrom {α β} [t : TopologicalSpace α] {b : Set (Set β)} {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ a : Set β, a ∈ b → IsOpen (f ⁻¹' a)) : t ≤ induced f (generateFrom b) := by
rw [induced_generateFrom_eq]
apply le_generateFrom
simp only [mem_image, and_imp, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂, exists_imp]
exact h
lemma generateFrom_insert_of_generateOpen {α : Type*} {s : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α}
(ht : GenerateOpen s t) : generateFrom (insert t s) = generateFrom s := by
refine le_antisymm (generateFrom_anti <| subset_insert t s) (le_generateFrom ?_)
rintro t (rfl | h)
· exact ht
· exact isOpen_generateFrom_of_mem h
@[simp]
lemma generateFrom_insert_univ {α : Type*} {s : Set (Set α)} :
generateFrom (insert univ s) = generateFrom s :=
generateFrom_insert_of_generateOpen .univ
@[simp]
lemma generateFrom_insert_empty {α : Type*} {s : Set (Set α)} :
generateFrom (insert ∅ s) = generateFrom s := by
rw [← sUnion_empty]
exact generateFrom_insert_of_generateOpen (.sUnion ∅ (fun s_1 a ↦ False.elim a))
/-- This construction is left adjoint to the operation sending a topology on `α`
to its neighborhood filter at a fixed point `a : α`. -/
def nhdsAdjoint (a : α) (f : Filter α) : TopologicalSpace α where
IsOpen s := a ∈ s → s ∈ f
isOpen_univ _ := univ_mem
isOpen_inter := fun _s _t hs ht ⟨has, hat⟩ => inter_mem (hs has) (ht hat)
isOpen_sUnion := fun _k hk ⟨u, hu, hau⟩ => mem_of_superset (hk u hu hau) (subset_sUnion_of_mem hu)
theorem gc_nhds (a : α) : GaloisConnection (nhdsAdjoint a) fun t => @nhds α t a := fun f t => by
rw [le_nhds_iff]
exact ⟨fun H s hs has => H _ has hs, fun H s has hs => H _ hs has⟩
theorem nhds_mono {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace α} {a : α} (h : t₁ ≤ t₂) :
@nhds α t₁ a ≤ @nhds α t₂ a :=
(gc_nhds a).monotone_u h
theorem le_iff_nhds {α : Type*} (t t' : TopologicalSpace α) :
t ≤ t' ↔ ∀ x, @nhds α t x ≤ @nhds α t' x :=
⟨fun h _ => nhds_mono h, le_of_nhds_le_nhds⟩
theorem isOpen_singleton_nhdsAdjoint {α : Type*} {a b : α} (f : Filter α) (hb : b ≠ a) :
IsOpen[nhdsAdjoint a f] {b} := fun h ↦
absurd h hb.symm
theorem nhds_nhdsAdjoint_same (a : α) (f : Filter α) :
@nhds α (nhdsAdjoint a f) a = pure a ⊔ f := by
let _ := nhdsAdjoint a f
apply le_antisymm
· rintro t ⟨hat : a ∈ t, htf : t ∈ f⟩
exact IsOpen.mem_nhds (fun _ ↦ htf) hat
· exact sup_le (pure_le_nhds _) ((gc_nhds a).le_u_l f)
theorem nhds_nhdsAdjoint_of_ne {a b : α} (f : Filter α) (h : b ≠ a) :
@nhds α (nhdsAdjoint a f) b = pure b :=
let _ := nhdsAdjoint a f
(isOpen_singleton_iff_nhds_eq_pure _).1 <| isOpen_singleton_nhdsAdjoint f h
theorem nhds_nhdsAdjoint [DecidableEq α] (a : α) (f : Filter α) :
@nhds α (nhdsAdjoint a f) = update pure a (pure a ⊔ f) :=
eq_update_iff.2 ⟨nhds_nhdsAdjoint_same .., fun _ ↦ nhds_nhdsAdjoint_of_ne _⟩
theorem le_nhdsAdjoint_iff' {a : α} {f : Filter α} {t : TopologicalSpace α} :
t ≤ nhdsAdjoint a f ↔ @nhds α t a ≤ pure a ⊔ f ∧ ∀ b ≠ a, @nhds α t b = pure b := by
classical
simp_rw [le_iff_nhds, nhds_nhdsAdjoint, forall_update_iff, (pure_le_nhds _).le_iff_eq]
theorem le_nhdsAdjoint_iff {α : Type*} (a : α) (f : Filter α) (t : TopologicalSpace α) :
t ≤ nhdsAdjoint a f ↔ @nhds α t a ≤ pure a ⊔ f ∧ ∀ b ≠ a, IsOpen[t] {b} := by
simp only [le_nhdsAdjoint_iff', @isOpen_singleton_iff_nhds_eq_pure α t]
theorem nhds_iInf {ι : Sort*} {t : ι → TopologicalSpace α} {a : α} :
@nhds α (iInf t) a = ⨅ i, @nhds α (t i) a :=
(gc_nhds a).u_iInf
theorem nhds_sInf {s : Set (TopologicalSpace α)} {a : α} :
@nhds α (sInf s) a = ⨅ t ∈ s, @nhds α t a :=
(gc_nhds a).u_sInf
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11215): TODO: timeouts without `b₁ := t₁`
theorem nhds_inf {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace α} {a : α} :
@nhds α (t₁ ⊓ t₂) a = @nhds α t₁ a ⊓ @nhds α t₂ a :=
(gc_nhds a).u_inf (b₁ := t₁)
theorem nhds_top {a : α} : @nhds α ⊤ a = ⊤ :=
(gc_nhds a).u_top
theorem isOpen_sup {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace α} {s : Set α} :
IsOpen[t₁ ⊔ t₂] s ↔ IsOpen[t₁] s ∧ IsOpen[t₂] s :=
Iff.rfl
open TopologicalSpace
variable {γ : Type*} {f : α → β} {ι : Sort*}
theorem continuous_iff_coinduced_le {t₁ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₂ : TopologicalSpace β} :
Continuous[t₁, t₂] f ↔ coinduced f t₁ ≤ t₂ :=
continuous_def
theorem continuous_iff_le_induced {t₁ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₂ : TopologicalSpace β} :
Continuous[t₁, t₂] f ↔ t₁ ≤ induced f t₂ :=
Iff.trans continuous_iff_coinduced_le (gc_coinduced_induced f _ _)
lemma continuous_generateFrom_iff {t : TopologicalSpace α} {b : Set (Set β)} :
Continuous[t, generateFrom b] f ↔ ∀ s ∈ b, IsOpen (f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [continuous_iff_coinduced_le, le_generateFrom_iff_subset_isOpen]
simp only [isOpen_coinduced, preimage_id', subset_def, mem_setOf]
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_induced_dom {t : TopologicalSpace β} : Continuous[induced f t, t] f :=
continuous_iff_le_induced.2 le_rfl
theorem continuous_induced_rng {g : γ → α} {t₂ : TopologicalSpace β} {t₁ : TopologicalSpace γ} :
Continuous[t₁, induced f t₂] g ↔ Continuous[t₁, t₂] (f ∘ g) := by
simp only [continuous_iff_le_induced, induced_compose]
theorem continuous_coinduced_rng {t : TopologicalSpace α} :
Continuous[t, coinduced f t] f :=
continuous_iff_coinduced_le.2 le_rfl
theorem continuous_coinduced_dom {g : β → γ} {t₁ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₂ : TopologicalSpace γ} :
Continuous[coinduced f t₁, t₂] g ↔ Continuous[t₁, t₂] (g ∘ f) := by
simp only [continuous_iff_coinduced_le, coinduced_compose]
theorem continuous_le_dom {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₃ : TopologicalSpace β} (h₁ : t₂ ≤ t₁)
(h₂ : Continuous[t₁, t₃] f) : Continuous[t₂, t₃] f := by
rw [continuous_iff_le_induced] at h₂ ⊢
exact le_trans h₁ h₂
theorem continuous_le_rng {t₁ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₂ t₃ : TopologicalSpace β} (h₁ : t₂ ≤ t₃)
(h₂ : Continuous[t₁, t₂] f) : Continuous[t₁, t₃] f := by
rw [continuous_iff_coinduced_le] at h₂ ⊢
exact le_trans h₂ h₁
theorem continuous_sup_dom {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₃ : TopologicalSpace β} :
Continuous[t₁ ⊔ t₂, t₃] f ↔ Continuous[t₁, t₃] f ∧ Continuous[t₂, t₃] f := by
simp only [continuous_iff_le_induced, sup_le_iff]
theorem continuous_sup_rng_left {t₁ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₃ t₂ : TopologicalSpace β} :
Continuous[t₁, t₂] f → Continuous[t₁, t₂ ⊔ t₃] f :=
continuous_le_rng le_sup_left
theorem continuous_sup_rng_right {t₁ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₃ t₂ : TopologicalSpace β} :
Continuous[t₁, t₃] f → Continuous[t₁, t₂ ⊔ t₃] f :=
continuous_le_rng le_sup_right
theorem continuous_sSup_dom {T : Set (TopologicalSpace α)} {t₂ : TopologicalSpace β} :
Continuous[sSup T, t₂] f ↔ ∀ t ∈ T, Continuous[t, t₂] f := by
simp only [continuous_iff_le_induced, sSup_le_iff]
theorem continuous_sSup_rng {t₁ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₂ : Set (TopologicalSpace β)}
{t : TopologicalSpace β} (h₁ : t ∈ t₂) (hf : Continuous[t₁, t] f) :
Continuous[t₁, sSup t₂] f :=
continuous_iff_coinduced_le.2 <| le_sSup_of_le h₁ <| continuous_iff_coinduced_le.1 hf
theorem continuous_iSup_dom {t₁ : ι → TopologicalSpace α} {t₂ : TopologicalSpace β} :
Continuous[iSup t₁, t₂] f ↔ ∀ i, Continuous[t₁ i, t₂] f := by
simp only [continuous_iff_le_induced, iSup_le_iff]
theorem continuous_iSup_rng {t₁ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₂ : ι → TopologicalSpace β} {i : ι}
(h : Continuous[t₁, t₂ i] f) : Continuous[t₁, iSup t₂] f :=
continuous_sSup_rng ⟨i, rfl⟩ h
theorem continuous_inf_rng {t₁ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₂ t₃ : TopologicalSpace β} :
Continuous[t₁, t₂ ⊓ t₃] f ↔ Continuous[t₁, t₂] f ∧ Continuous[t₁, t₃] f := by
simp only [continuous_iff_coinduced_le, le_inf_iff]
theorem continuous_inf_dom_left {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₃ : TopologicalSpace β} :
Continuous[t₁, t₃] f → Continuous[t₁ ⊓ t₂, t₃] f :=
continuous_le_dom inf_le_left
theorem continuous_inf_dom_right {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₃ : TopologicalSpace β} :
Continuous[t₂, t₃] f → Continuous[t₁ ⊓ t₂, t₃] f :=
continuous_le_dom inf_le_right
theorem continuous_sInf_dom {t₁ : Set (TopologicalSpace α)} {t₂ : TopologicalSpace β}
{t : TopologicalSpace α} (h₁ : t ∈ t₁) :
Continuous[t, t₂] f → Continuous[sInf t₁, t₂] f :=
continuous_le_dom <| sInf_le h₁
theorem continuous_sInf_rng {t₁ : TopologicalSpace α} {T : Set (TopologicalSpace β)} :
Continuous[t₁, sInf T] f ↔ ∀ t ∈ T, Continuous[t₁, t] f := by
simp only [continuous_iff_coinduced_le, le_sInf_iff]
theorem continuous_iInf_dom {t₁ : ι → TopologicalSpace α} {t₂ : TopologicalSpace β} {i : ι} :
Continuous[t₁ i, t₂] f → Continuous[iInf t₁, t₂] f :=
continuous_le_dom <| iInf_le _ _
theorem continuous_iInf_rng {t₁ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₂ : ι → TopologicalSpace β} :
Continuous[t₁, iInf t₂] f ↔ ∀ i, Continuous[t₁, t₂ i] f := by
simp only [continuous_iff_coinduced_le, le_iInf_iff]
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_bot {t : TopologicalSpace β} : Continuous[⊥, t] f :=
continuous_iff_le_induced.2 bot_le
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_top {t : TopologicalSpace α} : Continuous[t, ⊤] f :=
continuous_iff_coinduced_le.2 le_top
theorem continuous_id_iff_le {t t' : TopologicalSpace α} : Continuous[t, t'] id ↔ t ≤ t' :=
@continuous_def _ _ t t' id
theorem continuous_id_of_le {t t' : TopologicalSpace α} (h : t ≤ t') : Continuous[t, t'] id :=
continuous_id_iff_le.2 h
-- 𝓝 in the induced topology
theorem mem_nhds_induced [T : TopologicalSpace α] (f : β → α) (a : β) (s : Set β) :
s ∈ @nhds β (TopologicalSpace.induced f T) a ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 (f a), f ⁻¹' u ⊆ s := by
letI := T.induced f
simp_rw [mem_nhds_iff, isOpen_induced_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨u, usub, ⟨v, openv, rfl⟩, au⟩
exact ⟨v, ⟨v, Subset.rfl, openv, au⟩, usub⟩
· rintro ⟨u, ⟨v, vsubu, openv, amem⟩, finvsub⟩
exact ⟨f ⁻¹' v, (Set.preimage_mono vsubu).trans finvsub, ⟨⟨v, openv, rfl⟩, amem⟩⟩
theorem nhds_induced [T : TopologicalSpace α] (f : β → α) (a : β) :
@nhds β (TopologicalSpace.induced f T) a = comap f (𝓝 (f a)) := by
ext s
rw [mem_nhds_induced, mem_comap]
theorem induced_iff_nhds_eq [tα : TopologicalSpace α] [tβ : TopologicalSpace β] (f : β → α) :
tβ = tα.induced f ↔ ∀ b, 𝓝 b = comap f (𝓝 <| f b) := by
simp only [ext_iff_nhds, nhds_induced]
theorem map_nhds_induced_of_surjective [T : TopologicalSpace α] {f : β → α} (hf : Surjective f)
(a : β) : map f (@nhds β (TopologicalSpace.induced f T) a) = 𝓝 (f a) := by
rw [nhds_induced, map_comap_of_surjective hf]
theorem continuous_nhdsAdjoint_dom [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} {a : α} {l : Filter α} :
Continuous[nhdsAdjoint a l, _] f ↔ Tendsto f l (𝓝 (f a)) := by
simp_rw [continuous_iff_le_induced, gc_nhds _ _, nhds_induced, tendsto_iff_comap]
theorem coinduced_nhdsAdjoint (f : α → β) (a : α) (l : Filter α) :
| coinduced f (nhdsAdjoint a l) = nhdsAdjoint (f a) (map f l) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun _ ↦ by
rw [gc_nhds, ← continuous_iff_coinduced_le, continuous_nhdsAdjoint_dom, Tendsto]
| Mathlib/Topology/Order.lean | 755 | 757 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Simon Hudon, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Aesop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Init
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Init
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
import Mathlib.Tactic.SimpRw
import Mathlib.Tactic.SplitIfs
/-!
# Basic lemmas about semigroups, monoids, and groups
This file lists various basic lemmas about semigroups, monoids, and groups. Most proofs are
one-liners from the corresponding axioms. For the definitions of semigroups, monoids and groups, see
`Algebra/Group/Defs.lean`.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero DenselyOrdered
open Function
variable {α β G M : Type*}
section ite
variable [Pow α β]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) dite_smul]
lemma pow_dite (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a : α) (b : p → β) (c : ¬ p → β) :
a ^ (if h : p then b h else c h) = if h : p then a ^ b h else a ^ c h := by split_ifs <;> rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) smul_dite]
lemma dite_pow (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a : p → α) (b : ¬ p → α) (c : β) :
(if h : p then a h else b h) ^ c = if h : p then a h ^ c else b h ^ c := by split_ifs <;> rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) ite_smul]
lemma pow_ite (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a : α) (b c : β) :
a ^ (if p then b else c) = if p then a ^ b else a ^ c := pow_dite _ _ _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) smul_ite]
lemma ite_pow (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a b : α) (c : β) :
(if p then a else b) ^ c = if p then a ^ c else b ^ c := dite_pow _ _ _ _
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive (attr := simp)] dite_smul smul_dite ite_smul smul_ite
end ite
section Semigroup
variable [Semigroup α]
@[to_additive]
instance Semigroup.to_isAssociative : Std.Associative (α := α) (· * ·) := ⟨mul_assoc⟩
/-- Composing two multiplications on the left by `y` then `x`
is equal to a multiplication on the left by `x * y`.
-/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Composing two additions on the left by `y` then `x`
is equal to an addition on the left by `x + y`."]
theorem comp_mul_left (x y : α) : (x * ·) ∘ (y * ·) = (x * y * ·) := by
ext z
simp [mul_assoc]
/-- Composing two multiplications on the right by `y` and `x`
is equal to a multiplication on the right by `y * x`.
-/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Composing two additions on the right by `y` and `x`
is equal to an addition on the right by `y + x`."]
theorem comp_mul_right (x y : α) : (· * x) ∘ (· * y) = (· * (y * x)) := by
ext z
simp [mul_assoc]
end Semigroup
@[to_additive]
instance CommMagma.to_isCommutative [CommMagma G] : Std.Commutative (α := G) (· * ·) := ⟨mul_comm⟩
section MulOneClass
variable [MulOneClass M]
@[to_additive]
theorem ite_mul_one {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {a b : M} :
ite P (a * b) 1 = ite P a 1 * ite P b 1 := by
by_cases h : P <;> simp [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem ite_one_mul {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {a b : M} :
ite P 1 (a * b) = ite P 1 a * ite P 1 b := by
by_cases h : P <;> simp [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_iff_eq_one_of_mul_eq_one {a b : M} (h : a * b = 1) : a = 1 ↔ b = 1 := by
constructor <;> (rintro rfl; simpa using h)
@[to_additive]
theorem one_mul_eq_id : ((1 : M) * ·) = id :=
funext one_mul
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_one_eq_id : (· * (1 : M)) = id :=
funext mul_one
end MulOneClass
section CommSemigroup
variable [CommSemigroup G]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_left_comm (a b c : G) : a * (b * c) = b * (a * c) := by
rw [← mul_assoc, mul_comm a, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_right_comm (a b c : G) : a * b * c = a * c * b := by
rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm b, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mul_mul_comm (a b c d : G) : a * b * (c * d) = a * c * (b * d) := by
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_rotate (a b c : G) : a * b * c = b * c * a := by
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_rotate' (a b c : G) : a * (b * c) = b * (c * a) := by
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_comm]
end CommSemigroup
attribute [local simp] mul_assoc sub_eq_add_neg
section Monoid
variable [Monoid M] {a b : M} {m n : ℕ}
@[to_additive boole_nsmul]
lemma pow_boole (P : Prop) [Decidable P] (a : M) :
(a ^ if P then 1 else 0) = if P then a else 1 := by simp only [pow_ite, pow_one, pow_zero]
@[to_additive nsmul_add_sub_nsmul]
lemma pow_mul_pow_sub (a : M) (h : m ≤ n) : a ^ m * a ^ (n - m) = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_add, Nat.add_comm, Nat.sub_add_cancel h]
@[to_additive sub_nsmul_nsmul_add]
lemma pow_sub_mul_pow (a : M) (h : m ≤ n) : a ^ (n - m) * a ^ m = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_add, Nat.sub_add_cancel h]
@[to_additive sub_one_nsmul_add]
lemma mul_pow_sub_one (hn : n ≠ 0) (a : M) : a * a ^ (n - 1) = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_succ', Nat.sub_add_cancel <| Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 hn]
@[to_additive add_sub_one_nsmul]
lemma pow_sub_one_mul (hn : n ≠ 0) (a : M) : a ^ (n - 1) * a = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_succ, Nat.sub_add_cancel <| Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 hn]
/-- If `x ^ n = 1`, then `x ^ m` is the same as `x ^ (m % n)` -/
@[to_additive nsmul_eq_mod_nsmul "If `n • x = 0`, then `m • x` is the same as `(m % n) • x`"]
lemma pow_eq_pow_mod (m : ℕ) (ha : a ^ n = 1) : a ^ m = a ^ (m % n) := by
calc
a ^ m = a ^ (m % n + n * (m / n)) := by rw [Nat.mod_add_div]
_ = a ^ (m % n) := by simp [pow_add, pow_mul, ha]
@[to_additive] lemma pow_mul_pow_eq_one : ∀ n, a * b = 1 → a ^ n * b ^ n = 1
| 0, _ => by simp
| n + 1, h =>
calc
a ^ n.succ * b ^ n.succ = a ^ n * a * (b * b ^ n) := by rw [pow_succ, pow_succ']
_ = a ^ n * (a * b) * b ^ n := by simp only [mul_assoc]
_ = 1 := by simp [h, pow_mul_pow_eq_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma mul_left_iterate (a : M) : ∀ n : ℕ, (a * ·)^[n] = (a ^ n * ·)
| 0 => by ext; simp
| n + 1 => by ext; simp [pow_succ, mul_left_iterate]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma mul_right_iterate (a : M) : ∀ n : ℕ, (· * a)^[n] = (· * a ^ n)
| 0 => by ext; simp
| n + 1 => by ext; simp [pow_succ', mul_right_iterate]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_left_iterate_apply_one (a : M) : (a * ·)^[n] 1 = a ^ n := by simp [mul_right_iterate]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_right_iterate_apply_one (a : M) : (· * a)^[n] 1 = a ^ n := by simp [mul_right_iterate]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma pow_iterate (k : ℕ) : ∀ n : ℕ, (fun x : M ↦ x ^ k)^[n] = (· ^ k ^ n)
| 0 => by ext; simp
| n + 1 => by ext; simp [pow_iterate, Nat.pow_succ', pow_mul]
end Monoid
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid M] {x y z : M}
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_unique (hy : x * y = 1) (hz : x * z = 1) : y = z :=
left_inv_eq_right_inv (Trans.trans (mul_comm _ _) hy) hz
@[to_additive nsmul_add] lemma mul_pow (a b : M) : ∀ n, (a * b) ^ n = a ^ n * b ^ n
| 0 => by rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, pow_zero, one_mul]
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ', pow_succ', pow_succ', mul_pow, mul_mul_mul_comm]
end CommMonoid
section LeftCancelMonoid
variable [Monoid M] [IsLeftCancelMul M] {a b : M}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_eq_left : a * b = a ↔ b = 1 := calc
a * b = a ↔ a * b = a * 1 := by rw [mul_one]
_ ↔ b = 1 := mul_left_cancel_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias mul_right_eq_self := mul_eq_left
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias add_right_eq_self := add_eq_left
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] mul_right_eq_self
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem left_eq_mul : a = a * b ↔ b = 1 :=
eq_comm.trans mul_eq_left
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_eq_mul_right := left_eq_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_eq_add_right := left_eq_add
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] self_eq_mul_right
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_ne_left : a * b ≠ a ↔ b ≠ 1 := mul_eq_left.not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias mul_right_ne_self := mul_ne_left
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias add_right_ne_self := add_ne_left
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] mul_right_ne_self
@[to_additive]
theorem left_ne_mul : a ≠ a * b ↔ b ≠ 1 := left_eq_mul.not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_ne_mul_right := left_ne_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_ne_add_right := left_ne_add
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] self_ne_mul_right
end LeftCancelMonoid
section RightCancelMonoid
variable [RightCancelMonoid M] {a b : M}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_eq_right : a * b = b ↔ a = 1 := calc
a * b = b ↔ a * b = 1 * b := by rw [one_mul]
_ ↔ a = 1 := mul_right_cancel_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias mul_left_eq_self := mul_eq_right
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias add_left_eq_self := add_eq_right
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] mul_left_eq_self
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem right_eq_mul : b = a * b ↔ a = 1 :=
eq_comm.trans mul_eq_right
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_eq_mul_left := right_eq_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_eq_add_left := right_eq_add
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] self_eq_mul_left
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_ne_right : a * b ≠ b ↔ a ≠ 1 := mul_eq_right.not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias mul_left_ne_self := mul_ne_right
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias add_left_ne_self := add_ne_right
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] mul_left_ne_self
@[to_additive]
theorem right_ne_mul : b ≠ a * b ↔ a ≠ 1 := right_eq_mul.not
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_ne_mul_left := right_ne_mul
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] alias self_ne_add_left := right_ne_add
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive existing] self_ne_mul_left
end RightCancelMonoid
section CancelCommMonoid
variable [CancelCommMonoid α] {a b c d : α}
@[to_additive] lemma eq_iff_eq_of_mul_eq_mul (h : a * b = c * d) : a = c ↔ b = d := by aesop
@[to_additive] lemma ne_iff_ne_of_mul_eq_mul (h : a * b = c * d) : a ≠ c ↔ b ≠ d := by aesop
end CancelCommMonoid
section InvolutiveInv
variable [InvolutiveInv G] {a b : G}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_involutive : Function.Involutive (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
inv_inv
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_surjective : Function.Surjective (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
inv_involutive.surjective
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_injective : Function.Injective (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
inv_involutive.injective
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_inj : a⁻¹ = b⁻¹ ↔ a = b :=
inv_injective.eq_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_eq_iff_eq_inv : a⁻¹ = b ↔ a = b⁻¹ :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ (inv_inv a).symm, fun h => h.symm ▸ inv_inv b⟩
variable (G)
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_comp_inv : Inv.inv ∘ Inv.inv = @id G :=
inv_involutive.comp_self
@[to_additive]
theorem leftInverse_inv : LeftInverse (fun a : G ↦ a⁻¹) fun a ↦ a⁻¹ :=
inv_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem rightInverse_inv : RightInverse (fun a : G ↦ a⁻¹) fun a ↦ a⁻¹ :=
inv_inv
end InvolutiveInv
section DivInvMonoid
variable [DivInvMonoid G]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_one_div (x y : G) : x * (1 / y) = x / y := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, one_mul, div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive, field_simps] -- The attributes are out of order on purpose
theorem mul_div_assoc' (a b c : G) : a * (b / c) = a * b / c :=
(mul_div_assoc _ _ _).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_div (a b c : G) : a * (b / c) = a * b / c := by simp only [mul_assoc, div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_mul_one_div (a b : G) : a / b = a * (1 / b) := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, one_div]
end DivInvMonoid
section DivInvOneMonoid
variable [DivInvOneMonoid G]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_one (a : G) : a / 1 = a := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_one : (1 : G) / 1 = 1 :=
div_one _
end DivInvOneMonoid
section DivisionMonoid
variable [DivisionMonoid α] {a b c d : α}
attribute [local simp] mul_assoc div_eq_mul_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_right (h : a * b = 1) : b = a⁻¹ :=
(inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right h).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_left (h : b * a = 1) : b = 1 / a := by
rw [eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left h, one_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_right (h : a * b = 1) : b = 1 / a := by
rw [eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_right h, one_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_of_div_eq_one (h : a / b = 1) : a = b :=
inv_injective <| inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right <| by rwa [← div_eq_mul_inv]
@[to_additive]
lemma eq_of_inv_mul_eq_one (h : a⁻¹ * b = 1) : a = b := by simpa using eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left h
@[to_additive]
lemma eq_of_mul_inv_eq_one (h : a * b⁻¹ = 1) : a = b := by simpa using eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left h
@[to_additive]
theorem div_ne_one_of_ne : a ≠ b → a / b ≠ 1 :=
mt eq_of_div_eq_one
variable (a b c)
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_mul_one_div_rev : 1 / a * (1 / b) = 1 / (b * a) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_div_left : a⁻¹ / b = (b * a)⁻¹ := by simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_div : (a / b)⁻¹ = b / a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_div : 1 / (a / b) = b / a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_one_div : 1 / (1 / a) = a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_div_iff_comm : a / b = c / d ↔ b / a = d / c :=
inv_inj.symm.trans <| by simp only [inv_div]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) DivisionMonoid.toDivInvOneMonoid : DivInvOneMonoid α :=
{ DivisionMonoid.toDivInvMonoid with
inv_one := by simpa only [one_div, inv_inv] using (inv_div (1 : α) 1).symm }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma inv_pow (a : α) : ∀ n : ℕ, a⁻¹ ^ n = (a ^ n)⁻¹
| 0 => by rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, inv_one]
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ', pow_succ, inv_pow _ n, mul_inv_rev]
-- the attributes are intentionally out of order. `smul_zero` proves `zsmul_zero`.
@[to_additive zsmul_zero, simp]
lemma one_zpow : ∀ n : ℤ, (1 : α) ^ n = 1
| (n : ℕ) => by rw [zpow_natCast, one_pow]
| .negSucc n => by rw [zpow_negSucc, one_pow, inv_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) neg_zsmul]
lemma zpow_neg (a : α) : ∀ n : ℤ, a ^ (-n) = (a ^ n)⁻¹
| (_ + 1 : ℕ) => DivInvMonoid.zpow_neg' _ _
| 0 => by simp
| Int.negSucc n => by
rw [zpow_negSucc, inv_inv, ← zpow_natCast]
rfl
@[to_additive neg_one_zsmul_add]
lemma mul_zpow_neg_one (a b : α) : (a * b) ^ (-1 : ℤ) = b ^ (-1 : ℤ) * a ^ (-1 : ℤ) := by
simp only [zpow_neg, zpow_one, mul_inv_rev]
@[to_additive zsmul_neg]
lemma inv_zpow (a : α) : ∀ n : ℤ, a⁻¹ ^ n = (a ^ n)⁻¹
| (n : ℕ) => by rw [zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, inv_pow]
| .negSucc n => by rw [zpow_negSucc, zpow_negSucc, inv_pow]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) zsmul_neg']
lemma inv_zpow' (a : α) (n : ℤ) : a⁻¹ ^ n = a ^ (-n) := by rw [inv_zpow, zpow_neg]
@[to_additive nsmul_zero_sub]
lemma one_div_pow (a : α) (n : ℕ) : (1 / a) ^ n = 1 / a ^ n := by simp only [one_div, inv_pow]
@[to_additive zsmul_zero_sub]
lemma one_div_zpow (a : α) (n : ℤ) : (1 / a) ^ n = 1 / a ^ n := by simp only [one_div, inv_zpow]
variable {a b c}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_eq_one : a⁻¹ = 1 ↔ a = 1 :=
inv_injective.eq_iff' inv_one
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem one_eq_inv : 1 = a⁻¹ ↔ a = 1 :=
eq_comm.trans inv_eq_one
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_ne_one : a⁻¹ ≠ 1 ↔ a ≠ 1 :=
inv_eq_one.not
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_of_one_div_eq_one_div (h : 1 / a = 1 / b) : a = b := by
rw [← one_div_one_div a, h, one_div_one_div]
-- Note that `mul_zsmul` and `zpow_mul` have the primes swapped
-- when additivised since their argument order,
-- and therefore the more "natural" choice of lemma, is reversed.
@[to_additive mul_zsmul'] lemma zpow_mul (a : α) : ∀ m n : ℤ, a ^ (m * n) = (a ^ m) ^ n
| (m : ℕ), (n : ℕ) => by
rw [zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, ← pow_mul, ← zpow_natCast]
rfl
| (m : ℕ), .negSucc n => by
rw [zpow_natCast, zpow_negSucc, ← pow_mul, Int.ofNat_mul_negSucc, zpow_neg, inv_inj,
← zpow_natCast]
| .negSucc m, (n : ℕ) => by
rw [zpow_natCast, zpow_negSucc, ← inv_pow, ← pow_mul, Int.negSucc_mul_ofNat, zpow_neg, inv_pow,
inv_inj, ← zpow_natCast]
| .negSucc m, .negSucc n => by
rw [zpow_negSucc, zpow_negSucc, Int.negSucc_mul_negSucc, inv_pow, inv_inv, ← pow_mul, ←
zpow_natCast]
rfl
@[to_additive mul_zsmul]
lemma zpow_mul' (a : α) (m n : ℤ) : a ^ (m * n) = (a ^ n) ^ m := by rw [Int.mul_comm, zpow_mul]
@[to_additive]
theorem zpow_comm (a : α) (m n : ℤ) : (a ^ m) ^ n = (a ^ n) ^ m := by rw [← zpow_mul, zpow_mul']
variable (a b c)
@[to_additive, field_simps] -- The attributes are out of order on purpose
theorem div_div_eq_mul_div : a / (b / c) = a * c / b := by simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_inv_eq_mul : a / b⁻¹ = a * b := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul_eq_div_div_swap : a / (b * c) = a / c / b := by
simp only [mul_assoc, mul_inv_rev, div_eq_mul_inv]
end DivisionMonoid
section DivisionCommMonoid
variable [DivisionCommMonoid α] (a b c d : α)
attribute [local simp] mul_assoc mul_comm mul_left_comm div_eq_mul_inv
@[to_additive neg_add]
theorem mul_inv : (a * b)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ * b⁻¹ := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_div' : (a / b)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ / b⁻¹ := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_inv_mul : a / b = b⁻¹ * a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_eq_div : a⁻¹ * b = b / a := by simp
@[to_additive] lemma inv_div_comm (a b : α) : a⁻¹ / b = b⁻¹ / a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul' : (a * b)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ / b := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_div_inv : a⁻¹ / b⁻¹ = b / a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_inv_div_inv : (a⁻¹ / b⁻¹)⁻¹ = a / b := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_mul_one_div : 1 / a * (1 / b) = 1 / (a * b) := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem div_right_comm : a / b / c = a / c / b := by simp
@[to_additive, field_simps]
| theorem div_div : a / b / c = a / (b * c) := by simp
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Basic.lean | 569 | 570 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.ZeroCons
/-!
# Basic results on multisets
-/
-- No algebra should be required
assert_not_exists Monoid
universe v
open List Subtype Nat Function
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type v} {γ : Type*}
namespace Multiset
/-! ### `Multiset.toList` -/
section ToList
/-- Produces a list of the elements in the multiset using choice. -/
noncomputable def toList (s : Multiset α) :=
s.out
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_toList (s : Multiset α) : (s.toList : Multiset α) = s :=
s.out_eq'
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_nil {s : Multiset α} : s.toList = [] ↔ s = 0 := by
rw [← coe_eq_zero, coe_toList]
theorem empty_toList {s : Multiset α} : s.toList.isEmpty ↔ s = 0 := by simp
@[simp]
theorem toList_zero : (Multiset.toList 0 : List α) = [] :=
toList_eq_nil.mpr rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_toList {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ s.toList ↔ a ∈ s := by
rw [← mem_coe, coe_toList]
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_singleton_iff {a : α} {m : Multiset α} : m.toList = [a] ↔ m = {a} := by
rw [← perm_singleton, ← coe_eq_coe, coe_toList, coe_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem toList_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Multiset α).toList = [a] :=
Multiset.toList_eq_singleton_iff.2 rfl
@[simp]
theorem length_toList (s : Multiset α) : s.toList.length = card s := by
rw [← coe_card, coe_toList]
end ToList
/-! ### Induction principles -/
/-- The strong induction principle for multisets. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (ih : ∀ s, (∀ t < s, p t) → p s) :
p s :=
(ih s) fun t _h =>
strongInductionOn t ih
termination_by card s
decreasing_by exact card_lt_card _h
theorem strongInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (H) :
@strongInductionOn _ p s H = H s fun t _h => @strongInductionOn _ p t H := by
rw [strongInductionOn]
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem case_strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Prop} (s : Multiset α) (h₀ : p 0)
(h₁ : ∀ a s, (∀ t ≤ s, p t) → p (a ::ₘ s)) : p s :=
Multiset.strongInductionOn s fun s =>
Multiset.induction_on s (fun _ => h₀) fun _a _s _ ih =>
(h₁ _ _) fun _t h => ih _ <| lt_of_le_of_lt h <| lt_cons_self _ _
/-- Suppose that, given that `p t` can be defined on all supersets of `s` of cardinality less than
`n`, one knows how to define `p s`. Then one can inductively define `p s` for all multisets `s` of
cardinality less than `n`, starting from multisets of card `n` and iterating. This
can be used either to define data, or to prove properties. -/
def strongDownwardInduction {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
card s ≤ n → p s :=
H s fun {t} ht _h =>
strongDownwardInduction H t ht
termination_by n - card s
decreasing_by simp_wf; have := (card_lt_card _h); omega
theorem strongDownwardInduction_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
strongDownwardInduction H s = H s fun ht _hst => strongDownwardInduction H _ ht := by
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
/-- Analogue of `strongDownwardInduction` with order of arguments swapped. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongDownwardInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ} :
∀ s : Multiset α,
(∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) →
card s ≤ n → p s :=
fun s H => strongDownwardInduction H s
theorem strongDownwardInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) :
s.strongDownwardInductionOn H = H s fun {t} ht _h => t.strongDownwardInductionOn H ht := by
dsimp only [strongDownwardInductionOn]
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : Multiset α)
/-- Given a proof `hp` that there exists a unique `a ∈ l` such that `p a`, `chooseX p l hp` returns
that `a` together with proofs of `a ∈ l` and `p a`. -/
def chooseX : ∀ _hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a, { a // a ∈ l ∧ p a } :=
Quotient.recOn l (fun l' ex_unique => List.chooseX p l' (ExistsUnique.exists ex_unique))
(by
intros a b _
funext hp
suffices all_equal : ∀ x y : { t // t ∈ b ∧ p t }, x = y by
apply all_equal
rintro ⟨x, px⟩ ⟨y, py⟩
rcases hp with ⟨z, ⟨_z_mem_l, _pz⟩, z_unique⟩
congr
calc
x = z := z_unique x px
_ = y := (z_unique y py).symm
)
/-- Given a proof `hp` that there exists a unique `a ∈ l` such that `p a`, `choose p l hp` returns
that `a`. -/
def choose (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : α :=
chooseX p l hp
theorem choose_spec (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(chooseX p l hp).property
theorem choose_mem (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).1
theorem choose_property (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).2
end Choose
variable (α) in
/-- The equivalence between lists and multisets of a subsingleton type. -/
def subsingletonEquiv [Subsingleton α] : List α ≃ Multiset α where
toFun := ofList
invFun :=
(Quot.lift id) fun (a b : List α) (h : a ~ b) =>
(List.ext_get h.length_eq) fun _ _ _ => Subsingleton.elim _ _
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv m := Quot.inductionOn m fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_subsingletonEquiv [Subsingleton α] :
(subsingletonEquiv α : List α → Multiset α) = ofList :=
rfl
section SizeOf
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {s : Multiset α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf s := by
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
exact List.sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem hx
end SizeOf
end Multiset
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Basic.lean | 3,106 | 3,115 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Julian Kuelshammer. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Julian Kuelshammer
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.OrderOfElement
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Peel
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
/-!
# Exponent of a group
This file defines the exponent of a group, or more generally a monoid. For a group `G` it is defined
to be the minimal `n≥1` such that `g ^ n = 1` for all `g ∈ G`. For a finite group `G`,
it is equal to the lowest common multiple of the order of all elements of the group `G`.
## Main definitions
* `Monoid.ExponentExists` is a predicate on a monoid `G` saying that there is some positive `n`
such that `g ^ n = 1` for all `g ∈ G`.
* `Monoid.exponent` defines the exponent of a monoid `G` as the minimal positive `n` such that
`g ^ n = 1` for all `g ∈ G`, by convention it is `0` if no such `n` exists.
* `AddMonoid.ExponentExists` the additive version of `Monoid.ExponentExists`.
* `AddMonoid.exponent` the additive version of `Monoid.exponent`.
## Main results
* `Monoid.lcm_order_eq_exponent`: For a finite left cancel monoid `G`, the exponent is equal to the
`Finset.lcm` of the order of its elements.
* `Monoid.exponent_eq_iSup_orderOf(')`: For a commutative cancel monoid, the exponent is
equal to `⨆ g : G, orderOf g` (or zero if it has any order-zero elements).
* `Monoid.exponent_pi` and `Monoid.exponent_prod`: The exponent of a finite product of monoids is
the least common multiple (`Finset.lcm` and `lcm`, respectively) of the exponents of the
constituent monoids.
* `MonoidHom.exponent_dvd`: If `f : M₁ →⋆ M₂` is surjective, then the exponent of `M₂` divides the
exponent of `M₁`.
## TODO
* Refactor the characteristic of a ring to be the exponent of its underlying additive group.
-/
universe u
variable {G : Type u}
namespace Monoid
section Monoid
variable (G) [Monoid G]
/-- A predicate on a monoid saying that there is a positive integer `n` such that `g ^ n = 1`
for all `g`. -/
@[to_additive
"A predicate on an additive monoid saying that there is a positive integer `n` such\n
that `n • g = 0` for all `g`."]
def ExponentExists :=
∃ n, 0 < n ∧ ∀ g : G, g ^ n = 1
open scoped Classical in
/-- The exponent of a group is the smallest positive integer `n` such that `g ^ n = 1` for all
`g ∈ G` if it exists, otherwise it is zero by convention. -/
@[to_additive
"The exponent of an additive group is the smallest positive integer `n` such that\n
`n • g = 0` for all `g ∈ G` if it exists, otherwise it is zero by convention."]
noncomputable def exponent :=
if h : ExponentExists G then Nat.find h else 0
variable {G}
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AddMonoid.exponent_additive :
AddMonoid.exponent (Additive G) = exponent G := rfl
@[simp]
theorem exponent_multiplicative {G : Type*} [AddMonoid G] :
exponent (Multiplicative G) = AddMonoid.exponent G := rfl
open MulOpposite in
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem _root_.MulOpposite.exponent : exponent (MulOpposite G) = exponent G := by
simp only [Monoid.exponent, ExponentExists]
congr!
all_goals exact ⟨(op_injective <| · <| op ·), (unop_injective <| · <| unop ·)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem ExponentExists.isOfFinOrder (h : ExponentExists G) {g : G} : IsOfFinOrder g :=
isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr <| by peel 2 h; exact this g
@[to_additive]
theorem ExponentExists.orderOf_pos (h : ExponentExists G) (g : G) : 0 < orderOf g :=
h.isOfFinOrder.orderOf_pos
@[to_additive]
theorem exponent_ne_zero : exponent G ≠ 0 ↔ ExponentExists G := by
rw [exponent]
split_ifs with h
· simp [h, @not_lt_zero' ℕ]
--if this isn't done this way, `to_additive` freaks
· tauto
@[to_additive]
protected alias ⟨_, ExponentExists.exponent_ne_zero⟩ := exponent_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem exponent_pos : 0 < exponent G ↔ ExponentExists G :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans exponent_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
protected alias ⟨_, ExponentExists.exponent_pos⟩ := exponent_pos
@[to_additive]
theorem exponent_eq_zero_iff : exponent G = 0 ↔ ¬ExponentExists G :=
exponent_ne_zero.not_right
@[to_additive exponent_eq_zero_addOrder_zero]
theorem exponent_eq_zero_of_order_zero {g : G} (hg : orderOf g = 0) : exponent G = 0 :=
exponent_eq_zero_iff.mpr fun h ↦ h.orderOf_pos g |>.ne' hg
/-- The exponent is zero iff for all nonzero `n`, one can find a `g` such that `g ^ n ≠ 1`. -/
@[to_additive "The exponent is zero iff for all nonzero `n`, one can find a `g` such that
`n • g ≠ 0`."]
theorem exponent_eq_zero_iff_forall : exponent G = 0 ↔ ∀ n > 0, ∃ g : G, g ^ n ≠ 1 := by
rw [exponent_eq_zero_iff, ExponentExists]
push_neg
rfl
@[to_additive exponent_nsmul_eq_zero]
theorem pow_exponent_eq_one (g : G) : g ^ exponent G = 1 := by
classical
by_cases h : ExponentExists G
· simp_rw [exponent, dif_pos h]
exact (Nat.find_spec h).2 g
· simp_rw [exponent, dif_neg h, pow_zero]
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_eq_mod_exponent {n : ℕ} (g : G) : g ^ n = g ^ (n % exponent G) :=
calc
g ^ n = g ^ (n % exponent G + exponent G * (n / exponent G)) := by rw [Nat.mod_add_div]
_ = g ^ (n % exponent G) := by simp [pow_add, pow_mul, pow_exponent_eq_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem exponent_pos_of_exists (n : ℕ) (hpos : 0 < n) (hG : ∀ g : G, g ^ n = 1) :
0 < exponent G :=
ExponentExists.exponent_pos ⟨n, hpos, hG⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem exponent_min' (n : ℕ) (hpos : 0 < n) (hG : ∀ g : G, g ^ n = 1) : exponent G ≤ n := by
classical
rw [exponent, dif_pos]
· apply Nat.find_min'
exact ⟨hpos, hG⟩
· exact ⟨n, hpos, hG⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem exponent_min (m : ℕ) (hpos : 0 < m) (hm : m < exponent G) : ∃ g : G, g ^ m ≠ 1 := by
by_contra! h
have hcon : exponent G ≤ m := exponent_min' m hpos h
omega
@[to_additive AddMonoid.exp_eq_one_iff]
theorem exp_eq_one_iff : exponent G = 1 ↔ Subsingleton G := by
refine ⟨fun eq_one => ⟨fun a b => ?a_eq_b⟩, fun h => le_antisymm ?le ?ge⟩
· rw [← pow_one a, ← pow_one b, ← eq_one, Monoid.pow_exponent_eq_one, Monoid.pow_exponent_eq_one]
· apply exponent_min' _ Nat.one_pos
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
· apply Nat.succ_le_of_lt
apply exponent_pos_of_exists 1 Nat.one_pos
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) AddMonoid.exp_eq_one_of_subsingleton]
theorem exp_eq_one_of_subsingleton [hs : Subsingleton G] : exponent G = 1 :=
exp_eq_one_iff.mpr hs
@[to_additive addOrder_dvd_exponent]
theorem order_dvd_exponent (g : G) : orderOf g ∣ exponent G :=
orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one <| pow_exponent_eq_one g
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_le_exponent (h : ExponentExists G) (g : G) : orderOf g ≤ exponent G :=
Nat.le_of_dvd h.exponent_pos (order_dvd_exponent g)
@[to_additive]
theorem exponent_dvd_iff_forall_pow_eq_one {n : ℕ} : exponent G ∣ n ↔ ∀ g : G, g ^ n = 1 := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hpos)
· simp
constructor
· intro h g
rw [Nat.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero] at h
rw [pow_eq_mod_exponent, h, pow_zero]
· intro hG
by_contra h
rw [Nat.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero, ← Ne, ← pos_iff_ne_zero] at h
have h₂ : n % exponent G < exponent G := Nat.mod_lt _ (exponent_pos_of_exists n hpos hG)
have h₃ : exponent G ≤ n % exponent G := by
apply exponent_min' _ h
simp_rw [← pow_eq_mod_exponent]
exact hG
exact h₂.not_le h₃
@[to_additive]
alias ⟨_, exponent_dvd_of_forall_pow_eq_one⟩ := exponent_dvd_iff_forall_pow_eq_one
@[to_additive]
theorem exponent_dvd {n : ℕ} : exponent G ∣ n ↔ ∀ g : G, orderOf g ∣ n := by
simp_rw [exponent_dvd_iff_forall_pow_eq_one, orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
variable (G)
@[to_additive]
theorem lcm_orderOf_dvd_exponent [Fintype G] :
(Finset.univ : Finset G).lcm orderOf ∣ exponent G := by
apply Finset.lcm_dvd
intro g _
exact order_dvd_exponent g
@[to_additive exists_addOrderOf_eq_pow_padic_val_nat_add_exponent]
theorem _root_.Nat.Prime.exists_orderOf_eq_pow_factorization_exponent {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) :
∃ g : G, orderOf g = p ^ (exponent G).factorization p := by
haveI := Fact.mk hp
rcases eq_or_ne ((exponent G).factorization p) 0 with (h | h)
· refine ⟨1, by rw [h, pow_zero, orderOf_one]⟩
have he : 0 < exponent G :=
Ne.bot_lt fun ht => by
rw [ht] at h
apply h
rw [bot_eq_zero, Nat.factorization_zero, Finsupp.zero_apply]
rw [← Finsupp.mem_support_iff] at h
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ : ∃ g : G, g ^ (exponent G / p) ≠ 1 := by
suffices key : ¬exponent G ∣ exponent G / p by
rwa [exponent_dvd_iff_forall_pow_eq_one, not_forall] at key
exact fun hd =>
hp.one_lt.not_le
((mul_le_iff_le_one_left he).mp <|
Nat.le_of_dvd he <| Nat.mul_dvd_of_dvd_div (Nat.dvd_of_mem_primeFactors h) hd)
obtain ⟨k, hk : exponent G = p ^ _ * k⟩ := Nat.ordProj_dvd _ _
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (Finsupp.mem_support_iff.mp h)
refine ⟨g ^ k, ?_⟩
rw [ht]
apply orderOf_eq_prime_pow
· rwa [hk, mul_comm, ht, pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, Nat.mul_div_cancel _ hp.pos, pow_mul] at hg
· rw [← Nat.succ_eq_add_one, ← ht, ← pow_mul, mul_comm, ← hk]
exact pow_exponent_eq_one g
variable {G} in
| open Nat in
/-- If two commuting elements `x` and `y` of a monoid have order `n` and `m`, there is an element
of order `lcm n m`. The result actually gives an explicit (computable) element, written as the
product of a power of `x` and a power of `y`. See also the result below if you don't need the
explicit formula. -/
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Exponent.lean | 250 | 254 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.IsField
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Inductions
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Monic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Regular
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Multiplicity
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Lattice
/-!
# Division of univariate polynomials
The main defs are `divByMonic` and `modByMonic`.
The compatibility between these is given by `modByMonic_add_div`.
We also define `rootMultiplicity`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Finset
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w z
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} {A : Type z} {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
theorem X_dvd_iff {f : R[X]} : X ∣ f ↔ f.coeff 0 = 0 :=
⟨fun ⟨g, hfg⟩ => by rw [hfg, coeff_X_mul_zero], fun hf =>
⟨f.divX, by rw [← add_zero (X * f.divX), ← C_0, ← hf, X_mul_divX_add]⟩⟩
theorem X_pow_dvd_iff {f : R[X]} {n : ℕ} : X ^ n ∣ f ↔ ∀ d < n, f.coeff d = 0 :=
⟨fun ⟨g, hgf⟩ d hd => by
simp only [hgf, coeff_X_pow_mul', ite_eq_right_iff, not_le_of_lt hd, IsEmpty.forall_iff],
fun hd => by
induction n with
| zero => simp [pow_zero, one_dvd]
| succ n hn =>
obtain ⟨g, hgf⟩ := hn fun d : ℕ => fun H : d < n => hd _ (Nat.lt_succ_of_lt H)
have := coeff_X_pow_mul g n 0
rw [zero_add, ← hgf, hd n (Nat.lt_succ_self n)] at this
obtain ⟨k, hgk⟩ := Polynomial.X_dvd_iff.mpr this.symm
use k
rwa [pow_succ, mul_assoc, ← hgk]⟩
variable {p q : R[X]}
theorem finiteMultiplicity_of_degree_pos_of_monic (hp : (0 : WithBot ℕ) < degree p) (hmp : Monic p)
(hq : q ≠ 0) : FiniteMultiplicity p q :=
have zn0 : (0 : R) ≠ 1 :=
haveI := Nontrivial.of_polynomial_ne hq
zero_ne_one
⟨natDegree q, fun ⟨r, hr⟩ => by
have hp0 : p ≠ 0 := fun hp0 => by simp [hp0] at hp
have hr0 : r ≠ 0 := fun hr0 => by subst hr0; simp [hq] at hr
have hpn1 : leadingCoeff p ^ (natDegree q + 1) = 1 := by simp [show _ = _ from hmp]
have hpn0' : leadingCoeff p ^ (natDegree q + 1) ≠ 0 := hpn1.symm ▸ zn0.symm
have hpnr0 : leadingCoeff (p ^ (natDegree q + 1)) * leadingCoeff r ≠ 0 := by
simp only [leadingCoeff_pow' hpn0', leadingCoeff_eq_zero, hpn1, one_pow, one_mul, Ne,
hr0, not_false_eq_true]
have hnp : 0 < natDegree p := Nat.cast_lt.1 <| by
rw [← degree_eq_natDegree hp0]; exact hp
have := congr_arg natDegree hr
rw [natDegree_mul' hpnr0, natDegree_pow' hpn0', add_mul, add_assoc] at this
exact
ne_of_lt
(lt_add_of_le_of_pos (le_mul_of_one_le_right (Nat.zero_le _) hnp)
(add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg (by rwa [one_mul]) (Nat.zero_le _)))
this⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity_finite_of_degree_pos_of_monic := finiteMultiplicity_of_degree_pos_of_monic
end Semiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem div_wf_lemma (h : degree q ≤ degree p ∧ p ≠ 0) (hq : Monic q) :
degree (p - q * (C (leadingCoeff p) * X ^ (natDegree p - natDegree q))) < degree p :=
have hp : leadingCoeff p ≠ 0 := mt leadingCoeff_eq_zero.1 h.2
have hq0 : q ≠ 0 := hq.ne_zero_of_polynomial_ne h.2
have hlt : natDegree q ≤ natDegree p :=
(Nat.cast_le (α := WithBot ℕ)).1
(by rw [← degree_eq_natDegree h.2, ← degree_eq_natDegree hq0]; exact h.1)
degree_sub_lt
(by
rw [hq.degree_mul_comm, hq.degree_mul, degree_C_mul_X_pow _ hp, degree_eq_natDegree h.2,
degree_eq_natDegree hq0, ← Nat.cast_add, tsub_add_cancel_of_le hlt])
h.2 (by rw [leadingCoeff_monic_mul hq, leadingCoeff_mul_X_pow, leadingCoeff_C])
/-- See `divByMonic`. -/
noncomputable def divModByMonicAux : ∀ (_p : R[X]) {q : R[X]}, Monic q → R[X] × R[X]
| p, q, hq =>
letI := Classical.decEq R
if h : degree q ≤ degree p ∧ p ≠ 0 then
let z := C (leadingCoeff p) * X ^ (natDegree p - natDegree q)
have _wf := div_wf_lemma h hq
let dm := divModByMonicAux (p - q * z) hq
⟨z + dm.1, dm.2⟩
else ⟨0, p⟩
termination_by p => p
/-- `divByMonic`, denoted as `p /ₘ q`, gives the quotient of `p` by a monic polynomial `q`. -/
def divByMonic (p q : R[X]) : R[X] :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if hq : Monic q then (divModByMonicAux p hq).1 else 0
/-- `modByMonic`, denoted as `p %ₘ q`, gives the remainder of `p` by a monic polynomial `q`. -/
def modByMonic (p q : R[X]) : R[X] :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if hq : Monic q then (divModByMonicAux p hq).2 else p
@[inherit_doc]
infixl:70 " /ₘ " => divByMonic
@[inherit_doc]
infixl:70 " %ₘ " => modByMonic
theorem degree_modByMonic_lt [Nontrivial R] :
∀ (p : R[X]) {q : R[X]} (_hq : Monic q), degree (p %ₘ q) < degree q
| p, q, hq =>
letI := Classical.decEq R
if h : degree q ≤ degree p ∧ p ≠ 0 then by
have _wf := div_wf_lemma ⟨h.1, h.2⟩ hq
have :=
degree_modByMonic_lt (p - q * (C (leadingCoeff p) * X ^ (natDegree p - natDegree q))) hq
unfold modByMonic at this ⊢
unfold divModByMonicAux
dsimp
rw [dif_pos hq] at this ⊢
rw [if_pos h]
exact this
else
Or.casesOn (not_and_or.1 h)
(by
unfold modByMonic divModByMonicAux
dsimp
rw [dif_pos hq, if_neg h]
exact lt_of_not_ge)
(by
intro hp
unfold modByMonic divModByMonicAux
dsimp
rw [dif_pos hq, if_neg h, Classical.not_not.1 hp]
exact lt_of_le_of_ne bot_le (Ne.symm (mt degree_eq_bot.1 hq.ne_zero)))
termination_by p => p
theorem natDegree_modByMonic_lt (p : R[X]) {q : R[X]} (hmq : Monic q) (hq : q ≠ 1) :
natDegree (p %ₘ q) < q.natDegree := by
by_cases hpq : p %ₘ q = 0
· rw [hpq, natDegree_zero, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero]
contrapose! hq
exact eq_one_of_monic_natDegree_zero hmq hq
· haveI := Nontrivial.of_polynomial_ne hpq
exact natDegree_lt_natDegree hpq (degree_modByMonic_lt p hmq)
@[simp]
theorem zero_modByMonic (p : R[X]) : 0 %ₘ p = 0 := by
classical
unfold modByMonic divModByMonicAux
dsimp
by_cases hp : Monic p
· rw [dif_pos hp, if_neg (mt And.right (not_not_intro rfl)), Prod.snd_zero]
· rw [dif_neg hp]
@[simp]
theorem zero_divByMonic (p : R[X]) : 0 /ₘ p = 0 := by
classical
unfold divByMonic divModByMonicAux
dsimp
by_cases hp : Monic p
· rw [dif_pos hp, if_neg (mt And.right (not_not_intro rfl)), Prod.fst_zero]
· rw [dif_neg hp]
@[simp]
theorem modByMonic_zero (p : R[X]) : p %ₘ 0 = p :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if h : Monic (0 : R[X]) then by
haveI := monic_zero_iff_subsingleton.mp h
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
else by unfold modByMonic divModByMonicAux; rw [dif_neg h]
@[simp]
theorem divByMonic_zero (p : R[X]) : p /ₘ 0 = 0 :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if h : Monic (0 : R[X]) then by
haveI := monic_zero_iff_subsingleton.mp h
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
else by unfold divByMonic divModByMonicAux; rw [dif_neg h]
theorem divByMonic_eq_of_not_monic (p : R[X]) (hq : ¬Monic q) : p /ₘ q = 0 :=
dif_neg hq
theorem modByMonic_eq_of_not_monic (p : R[X]) (hq : ¬Monic q) : p %ₘ q = p :=
dif_neg hq
theorem modByMonic_eq_self_iff [Nontrivial R] (hq : Monic q) : p %ₘ q = p ↔ degree p < degree q :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ degree_modByMonic_lt _ hq, fun h => by
classical
have : ¬degree q ≤ degree p := not_le_of_gt h
unfold modByMonic divModByMonicAux; dsimp; rw [dif_pos hq, if_neg (mt And.left this)]⟩
theorem degree_modByMonic_le (p : R[X]) {q : R[X]} (hq : Monic q) : degree (p %ₘ q) ≤ degree q := by
nontriviality R
exact (degree_modByMonic_lt _ hq).le
theorem degree_modByMonic_le_left : degree (p %ₘ q) ≤ degree p := by
nontriviality R
by_cases hq : q.Monic
· cases lt_or_ge (degree p) (degree q)
· rw [(modByMonic_eq_self_iff hq).mpr ‹_›]
· exact (degree_modByMonic_le p hq).trans ‹_›
· rw [modByMonic_eq_of_not_monic p hq]
theorem natDegree_modByMonic_le (p : Polynomial R) {g : Polynomial R} (hg : g.Monic) :
natDegree (p %ₘ g) ≤ g.natDegree :=
natDegree_le_natDegree (degree_modByMonic_le p hg)
theorem natDegree_modByMonic_le_left : natDegree (p %ₘ q) ≤ natDegree p :=
natDegree_le_natDegree degree_modByMonic_le_left
theorem X_dvd_sub_C : X ∣ p - C (p.coeff 0) := by
simp [X_dvd_iff, coeff_C]
theorem modByMonic_eq_sub_mul_div :
∀ (p : R[X]) {q : R[X]} (_hq : Monic q), p %ₘ q = p - q * (p /ₘ q)
| p, q, hq =>
letI := Classical.decEq R
if h : degree q ≤ degree p ∧ p ≠ 0 then by
have _wf := div_wf_lemma h hq
have ih := modByMonic_eq_sub_mul_div
(p - q * (C (leadingCoeff p) * X ^ (natDegree p - natDegree q))) hq
unfold modByMonic divByMonic divModByMonicAux
dsimp
rw [dif_pos hq, if_pos h]
rw [modByMonic, dif_pos hq] at ih
refine ih.trans ?_
unfold divByMonic
rw [dif_pos hq, dif_pos hq, if_pos h, mul_add, sub_add_eq_sub_sub]
else by
unfold modByMonic divByMonic divModByMonicAux
dsimp
rw [dif_pos hq, if_neg h, dif_pos hq, if_neg h, mul_zero, sub_zero]
termination_by p => p
theorem modByMonic_add_div (p : R[X]) {q : R[X]} (hq : Monic q) : p %ₘ q + q * (p /ₘ q) = p :=
eq_sub_iff_add_eq.1 (modByMonic_eq_sub_mul_div p hq)
theorem divByMonic_eq_zero_iff [Nontrivial R] (hq : Monic q) : p /ₘ q = 0 ↔ degree p < degree q :=
⟨fun h => by
have := modByMonic_add_div p hq
rwa [h, mul_zero, add_zero, modByMonic_eq_self_iff hq] at this,
fun h => by
classical
have : ¬degree q ≤ degree p := not_le_of_gt h
unfold divByMonic divModByMonicAux; dsimp; rw [dif_pos hq, if_neg (mt And.left this)]⟩
theorem degree_add_divByMonic (hq : Monic q) (h : degree q ≤ degree p) :
degree q + degree (p /ₘ q) = degree p := by
nontriviality R
have hdiv0 : p /ₘ q ≠ 0 := by rwa [Ne, divByMonic_eq_zero_iff hq, not_lt]
have hlc : leadingCoeff q * leadingCoeff (p /ₘ q) ≠ 0 := by
rwa [Monic.def.1 hq, one_mul, Ne, leadingCoeff_eq_zero]
have hmod : degree (p %ₘ q) < degree (q * (p /ₘ q)) :=
calc
degree (p %ₘ q) < degree q := degree_modByMonic_lt _ hq
_ ≤ _ := by
rw [degree_mul' hlc, degree_eq_natDegree hq.ne_zero, degree_eq_natDegree hdiv0, ←
Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_le]
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
calc
degree q + degree (p /ₘ q) = degree (q * (p /ₘ q)) := Eq.symm (degree_mul' hlc)
_ = degree (p %ₘ q + q * (p /ₘ q)) := (degree_add_eq_right_of_degree_lt hmod).symm
_ = _ := congr_arg _ (modByMonic_add_div _ hq)
theorem degree_divByMonic_le (p q : R[X]) : degree (p /ₘ q) ≤ degree p :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if hp0 : p = 0 then by simp only [hp0, zero_divByMonic, le_refl]
else
if hq : Monic q then
if h : degree q ≤ degree p then by
haveI := Nontrivial.of_polynomial_ne hp0
rw [← degree_add_divByMonic hq h, degree_eq_natDegree hq.ne_zero,
degree_eq_natDegree (mt (divByMonic_eq_zero_iff hq).1 (not_lt.2 h))]
exact WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 (Nat.le_add_left _ _)
else by
unfold divByMonic divModByMonicAux
simp [dif_pos hq, h, if_false, degree_zero, bot_le]
else (divByMonic_eq_of_not_monic p hq).symm ▸ bot_le
theorem degree_divByMonic_lt (p : R[X]) {q : R[X]} (hq : Monic q) (hp0 : p ≠ 0)
(h0q : 0 < degree q) : degree (p /ₘ q) < degree p :=
if hpq : degree p < degree q then by
haveI := Nontrivial.of_polynomial_ne hp0
rw [(divByMonic_eq_zero_iff hq).2 hpq, degree_eq_natDegree hp0]
exact WithBot.bot_lt_coe _
else by
haveI := Nontrivial.of_polynomial_ne hp0
rw [← degree_add_divByMonic hq (not_lt.1 hpq), degree_eq_natDegree hq.ne_zero,
degree_eq_natDegree (mt (divByMonic_eq_zero_iff hq).1 hpq)]
exact
Nat.cast_lt.2
(Nat.lt_add_of_pos_left (Nat.cast_lt.1 <|
by simpa [degree_eq_natDegree hq.ne_zero] using h0q))
theorem natDegree_divByMonic (f : R[X]) {g : R[X]} (hg : g.Monic) :
natDegree (f /ₘ g) = natDegree f - natDegree g := by
nontriviality R
by_cases hfg : f /ₘ g = 0
· rw [hfg, natDegree_zero]
rw [divByMonic_eq_zero_iff hg] at hfg
rw [tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.mpr (natDegree_le_natDegree <| le_of_lt hfg)]
have hgf := hfg
rw [divByMonic_eq_zero_iff hg] at hgf
push_neg at hgf
have := degree_add_divByMonic hg hgf
have hf : f ≠ 0 := by
intro hf
apply hfg
rw [hf, zero_divByMonic]
rw [degree_eq_natDegree hf, degree_eq_natDegree hg.ne_zero, degree_eq_natDegree hfg,
← Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_inj] at this
rw [← this, add_tsub_cancel_left]
theorem div_modByMonic_unique {f g} (q r : R[X]) (hg : Monic g)
(h : r + g * q = f ∧ degree r < degree g) : f /ₘ g = q ∧ f %ₘ g = r := by
nontriviality R
have h₁ : r - f %ₘ g = -g * (q - f /ₘ g) :=
eq_of_sub_eq_zero
(by
rw [← sub_eq_zero_of_eq (h.1.trans (modByMonic_add_div f hg).symm)]
simp [mul_add, mul_comm, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, add_left_comm, add_assoc])
have h₂ : degree (r - f %ₘ g) = degree (g * (q - f /ₘ g)) := by simp [h₁]
have h₄ : degree (r - f %ₘ g) < degree g :=
calc
degree (r - f %ₘ g) ≤ max (degree r) (degree (f %ₘ g)) := degree_sub_le _ _
_ < degree g := max_lt_iff.2 ⟨h.2, degree_modByMonic_lt _ hg⟩
have h₅ : q - f /ₘ g = 0 :=
_root_.by_contradiction fun hqf =>
not_le_of_gt h₄ <|
calc
degree g ≤ degree g + degree (q - f /ₘ g) := by
rw [degree_eq_natDegree hg.ne_zero, degree_eq_natDegree hqf]
norm_cast
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
_ = degree (r - f %ₘ g) := by rw [h₂, degree_mul']; simpa [Monic.def.1 hg]
exact ⟨Eq.symm <| eq_of_sub_eq_zero h₅, Eq.symm <| eq_of_sub_eq_zero <| by simpa [h₅] using h₁⟩
theorem map_mod_divByMonic [Ring S] (f : R →+* S) (hq : Monic q) :
(p /ₘ q).map f = p.map f /ₘ q.map f ∧ (p %ₘ q).map f = p.map f %ₘ q.map f := by
nontriviality S
haveI : Nontrivial R := f.domain_nontrivial
have : map f p /ₘ map f q = map f (p /ₘ q) ∧ map f p %ₘ map f q = map f (p %ₘ q) :=
div_modByMonic_unique ((p /ₘ q).map f) _ (hq.map f)
⟨Eq.symm <| by rw [← Polynomial.map_mul, ← Polynomial.map_add, modByMonic_add_div _ hq],
calc
_ ≤ degree (p %ₘ q) := degree_map_le
_ < degree q := degree_modByMonic_lt _ hq
_ = _ :=
Eq.symm <|
degree_map_eq_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero _
(by rw [Monic.def.1 hq, f.map_one]; exact one_ne_zero)⟩
exact ⟨this.1.symm, this.2.symm⟩
theorem map_divByMonic [Ring S] (f : R →+* S) (hq : Monic q) :
(p /ₘ q).map f = p.map f /ₘ q.map f :=
(map_mod_divByMonic f hq).1
theorem map_modByMonic [Ring S] (f : R →+* S) (hq : Monic q) :
(p %ₘ q).map f = p.map f %ₘ q.map f :=
(map_mod_divByMonic f hq).2
theorem modByMonic_eq_zero_iff_dvd (hq : Monic q) : p %ₘ q = 0 ↔ q ∣ p :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← modByMonic_add_div p hq, h, zero_add]; exact dvd_mul_right _ _, fun h => by
nontriviality R
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := exists_eq_mul_right_of_dvd h
by_contra hpq0
have hmod : p %ₘ q = q * (r - p /ₘ q) := by rw [modByMonic_eq_sub_mul_div _ hq, mul_sub, ← hr]
have : degree (q * (r - p /ₘ q)) < degree q := hmod ▸ degree_modByMonic_lt _ hq
have hrpq0 : leadingCoeff (r - p /ₘ q) ≠ 0 := fun h =>
hpq0 <|
leadingCoeff_eq_zero.1
(by rw [hmod, leadingCoeff_eq_zero.1 h, mul_zero, leadingCoeff_zero])
have hlc : leadingCoeff q * leadingCoeff (r - p /ₘ q) ≠ 0 := by rwa [Monic.def.1 hq, one_mul]
rw [degree_mul' hlc, degree_eq_natDegree hq.ne_zero,
degree_eq_natDegree (mt leadingCoeff_eq_zero.2 hrpq0)] at this
exact not_lt_of_ge (Nat.le_add_right _ _) (WithBot.coe_lt_coe.1 this)⟩
/-- See `Polynomial.mul_self_modByMonic` for the other multiplication order. That version, unlike
this one, requires commutativity. -/
@[simp]
lemma self_mul_modByMonic (hq : q.Monic) : (q * p) %ₘ q = 0 := by
rw [modByMonic_eq_zero_iff_dvd hq]
exact dvd_mul_right q p
theorem map_dvd_map [Ring S] (f : R →+* S) (hf : Function.Injective f) {x y : R[X]}
(hx : x.Monic) : x.map f ∣ y.map f ↔ x ∣ y := by
rw [← modByMonic_eq_zero_iff_dvd hx, ← modByMonic_eq_zero_iff_dvd (hx.map f), ←
map_modByMonic f hx]
exact
⟨fun H => map_injective f hf <| by rw [H, Polynomial.map_zero], fun H => by
rw [H, Polynomial.map_zero]⟩
@[simp]
theorem modByMonic_one (p : R[X]) : p %ₘ 1 = 0 :=
(modByMonic_eq_zero_iff_dvd (by convert monic_one (R := R))).2 (one_dvd _)
@[simp]
theorem divByMonic_one (p : R[X]) : p /ₘ 1 = p := by
conv_rhs => rw [← modByMonic_add_div p monic_one]; simp
theorem sum_modByMonic_coeff (hq : q.Monic) {n : ℕ} (hn : q.degree ≤ n) :
(∑ i : Fin n, monomial i ((p %ₘ q).coeff i)) = p %ₘ q := by
nontriviality R
exact
(sum_fin (fun i c => monomial i c) (by simp) ((degree_modByMonic_lt _ hq).trans_le hn)).trans
(sum_monomial_eq _)
theorem mul_divByMonic_cancel_left (p : R[X]) {q : R[X]} (hmo : q.Monic) :
q * p /ₘ q = p := by
nontriviality R
refine (div_modByMonic_unique _ 0 hmo ⟨by rw [zero_add], ?_⟩).1
rw [degree_zero]
exact Ne.bot_lt fun h => hmo.ne_zero (degree_eq_bot.1 h)
lemma coeff_divByMonic_X_sub_C_rec (p : R[X]) (a : R) (n : ℕ) :
(p /ₘ (X - C a)).coeff n = coeff p (n + 1) + a * (p /ₘ (X - C a)).coeff (n + 1) := by
nontriviality R
have := monic_X_sub_C a
set q := p /ₘ (X - C a)
rw [← p.modByMonic_add_div this]
have : degree (p %ₘ (X - C a)) < ↑(n + 1) := degree_X_sub_C a ▸ p.degree_modByMonic_lt this
|>.trans_le <| WithBot.coe_le_coe.mpr le_add_self
simp [q, sub_mul, add_sub, coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt this]
theorem coeff_divByMonic_X_sub_C (p : R[X]) (a : R) (n : ℕ) :
(p /ₘ (X - C a)).coeff n = ∑ i ∈ Icc (n + 1) p.natDegree, a ^ (i - (n + 1)) * p.coeff i := by
wlog h : p.natDegree ≤ n generalizing n
· refine Nat.decreasingInduction' (fun n hn _ ih ↦ ?_) (le_of_not_le h) ?_
· rw [coeff_divByMonic_X_sub_C_rec, ih, eq_comm, Icc_eq_cons_Ioc (Nat.succ_le.mpr hn),
sum_cons, Nat.sub_self, pow_zero, one_mul, mul_sum]
congr 1; refine sum_congr ?_ fun i hi ↦ ?_
· ext; simp [Nat.succ_le]
rw [← mul_assoc, ← pow_succ', eq_comm, i.sub_succ', Nat.sub_add_cancel]
apply Nat.le_sub_of_add_le
rw [add_comm]; exact (mem_Icc.mp hi).1
· exact this _ le_rfl
rw [Icc_eq_empty (Nat.lt_succ.mpr h).not_le, sum_empty]
nontriviality R
by_cases hp : p.natDegree = 0
· rw [(divByMonic_eq_zero_iff <| monic_X_sub_C a).mpr, coeff_zero]
apply degree_lt_degree; rw [hp, natDegree_X_sub_C]; norm_num
· apply coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt
rw [natDegree_divByMonic p (monic_X_sub_C a), natDegree_X_sub_C]
exact (Nat.pred_lt hp).trans_le h
variable (R) in
theorem not_isField : ¬IsField R[X] := by
nontriviality R
intro h
letI := h.toField
simpa using congr_arg natDegree (monic_X.eq_one_of_isUnit <| monic_X (R := R).ne_zero.isUnit)
section multiplicity
/-- An algorithm for deciding polynomial divisibility.
The algorithm is "compute `p %ₘ q` and compare to `0`".
See `Polynomial.modByMonic` for the algorithm that computes `%ₘ`.
-/
def decidableDvdMonic [DecidableEq R] (p : R[X]) (hq : Monic q) : Decidable (q ∣ p) :=
decidable_of_iff (p %ₘ q = 0) (modByMonic_eq_zero_iff_dvd hq)
theorem finiteMultiplicity_X_sub_C (a : R) (h0 : p ≠ 0) : FiniteMultiplicity (X - C a) p := by
haveI := Nontrivial.of_polynomial_ne h0
refine finiteMultiplicity_of_degree_pos_of_monic ?_ (monic_X_sub_C _) h0
rw [degree_X_sub_C]
decide
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity_X_sub_C_finite := finiteMultiplicity_X_sub_C
/- Porting note: stripping out classical for decidability instance parameter might
make for better ergonomics -/
/-- The largest power of `X - C a` which divides `p`.
This *could be* computable via the divisibility algorithm `Polynomial.decidableDvdMonic`,
as shown by `Polynomial.rootMultiplicity_eq_nat_find_of_nonzero` which has a computable RHS. -/
def rootMultiplicity (a : R) (p : R[X]) : ℕ :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if h0 : p = 0 then 0
else
let _ : DecidablePred fun n : ℕ => ¬(X - C a) ^ (n + 1) ∣ p := fun n =>
have := decidableDvdMonic p ((monic_X_sub_C a).pow (n + 1))
inferInstanceAs (Decidable ¬_)
Nat.find (finiteMultiplicity_X_sub_C a h0)
/- Porting note: added the following due to diamond with decidableProp and
decidableDvdMonic see also [Zulip]
(https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/non-defeq.20aliased.20instance) -/
theorem rootMultiplicity_eq_nat_find_of_nonzero [DecidableEq R] {p : R[X]} (p0 : p ≠ 0) {a : R} :
letI : DecidablePred fun n : ℕ => ¬(X - C a) ^ (n + 1) ∣ p := fun n =>
have := decidableDvdMonic p ((monic_X_sub_C a).pow (n + 1))
inferInstanceAs (Decidable ¬_)
rootMultiplicity a p = Nat.find (finiteMultiplicity_X_sub_C a p0) := by
dsimp [rootMultiplicity]
cases Subsingleton.elim ‹DecidableEq R› (Classical.decEq R)
rw [dif_neg p0]
theorem rootMultiplicity_eq_multiplicity [DecidableEq R]
(p : R[X]) (a : R) :
rootMultiplicity a p =
if p = 0 then 0 else multiplicity (X - C a) p := by
simp only [rootMultiplicity, multiplicity, emultiplicity]
split
· rfl
rename_i h
simp only [finiteMultiplicity_X_sub_C a h, ↓reduceDIte]
rw [← ENat.some_eq_coe, WithTop.untopD_coe]
congr
@[simp]
theorem rootMultiplicity_zero {x : R} : rootMultiplicity x 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
@[simp]
theorem rootMultiplicity_C (r a : R) : rootMultiplicity a (C r) = 0 := by
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial R
· rw [Subsingleton.elim (C r) 0, rootMultiplicity_zero]
classical
rw [rootMultiplicity_eq_multiplicity]
split_ifs with hr
· rfl
have h : natDegree (C r) < natDegree (X - C a) := by simp
simp_rw [multiplicity_eq_zero.mpr ((monic_X_sub_C a).not_dvd_of_natDegree_lt hr h)]
theorem pow_rootMultiplicity_dvd (p : R[X]) (a : R) : (X - C a) ^ rootMultiplicity a p ∣ p :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if h : p = 0 then by simp [h]
else by
classical
rw [rootMultiplicity_eq_multiplicity, if_neg h]; apply pow_multiplicity_dvd
theorem pow_mul_divByMonic_rootMultiplicity_eq (p : R[X]) (a : R) :
(X - C a) ^ rootMultiplicity a p * (p /ₘ (X - C a) ^ rootMultiplicity a p) = p := by
have : Monic ((X - C a) ^ rootMultiplicity a p) := (monic_X_sub_C _).pow _
conv_rhs =>
rw [← modByMonic_add_div p this,
(modByMonic_eq_zero_iff_dvd this).2 (pow_rootMultiplicity_dvd _ _)]
simp
theorem exists_eq_pow_rootMultiplicity_mul_and_not_dvd (p : R[X]) (hp : p ≠ 0) (a : R) :
∃ q : R[X], p = (X - C a) ^ p.rootMultiplicity a * q ∧ ¬ (X - C a) ∣ q := by
classical
rw [rootMultiplicity_eq_multiplicity, if_neg hp]
apply (finiteMultiplicity_X_sub_C a hp).exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd
end multiplicity
end Ring
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] {p p₁ p₂ q : R[X]}
@[simp]
theorem modByMonic_X_sub_C_eq_C_eval (p : R[X]) (a : R) : p %ₘ (X - C a) = C (p.eval a) := by
nontriviality R
have h : (p %ₘ (X - C a)).eval a = p.eval a := by
rw [modByMonic_eq_sub_mul_div _ (monic_X_sub_C a), eval_sub, eval_mul, eval_sub, eval_X,
eval_C, sub_self, zero_mul, sub_zero]
have : degree (p %ₘ (X - C a)) < 1 :=
degree_X_sub_C a ▸ degree_modByMonic_lt p (monic_X_sub_C a)
have : degree (p %ₘ (X - C a)) ≤ 0 := by
revert this
cases degree (p %ₘ (X - C a))
| · exact fun _ => bot_le
· exact fun h => WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 (Nat.le_of_lt_succ (WithBot.coe_lt_coe.1 h))
rw [eq_C_of_degree_le_zero this, eval_C] at h
rw [eq_C_of_degree_le_zero this, h]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Div.lean | 587 | 591 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Quotient.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.ModuleCat.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.ConcreteCategory.EpiMono
/-!
# Monomorphisms in `Module R`
This file shows that an `R`-linear map is a monomorphism in the category of `R`-modules
if and only if it is injective, and similarly an epimorphism if and only if it is surjective.
-/
universe v u
open CategoryTheory
namespace ModuleCat
variable {R : Type u} [Ring R] {X Y : ModuleCat.{v} R} (f : X ⟶ Y)
variable {M : Type v} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
theorem ker_eq_bot_of_mono [Mono f] : LinearMap.ker f.hom = ⊥ :=
LinearMap.ker_eq_bot_of_cancel fun u v h => ModuleCat.hom_ext_iff.mp <|
(@cancel_mono _ _ _ _ _ f _ (↟u) (↟v)).1 <| ModuleCat.hom_ext_iff.mpr h
theorem range_eq_top_of_epi [Epi f] : LinearMap.range f.hom = ⊤ :=
LinearMap.range_eq_top_of_cancel fun u v h => ModuleCat.hom_ext_iff.mp <|
(@cancel_epi _ _ _ _ _ f _ (↟u) (↟v)).1 <| ModuleCat.hom_ext_iff.mpr h
theorem mono_iff_ker_eq_bot : Mono f ↔ LinearMap.ker f.hom = ⊥ :=
⟨fun _ => ker_eq_bot_of_mono _, fun hf =>
ConcreteCategory.mono_of_injective _ <| by convert LinearMap.ker_eq_bot.1 hf⟩
theorem mono_iff_injective : Mono f ↔ Function.Injective f := by
rw [mono_iff_ker_eq_bot, LinearMap.ker_eq_bot]
theorem epi_iff_range_eq_top : Epi f ↔ LinearMap.range f.hom = ⊤ :=
⟨fun _ => range_eq_top_of_epi _, fun hf =>
ConcreteCategory.epi_of_surjective _ <| by convert LinearMap.range_eq_top.1 hf⟩
theorem epi_iff_surjective : Epi f ↔ Function.Surjective f := by
rw [epi_iff_range_eq_top, LinearMap.range_eq_top]
/-- If the zero morphism is an epi then the codomain is trivial. -/
def uniqueOfEpiZero (X) [h : Epi (0 : X ⟶ of R M)] : Unique M :=
uniqueOfSurjectiveZero X ((ModuleCat.epi_iff_surjective _).mp h)
instance mono_as_hom'_subtype (U : Submodule R X) : Mono (ModuleCat.ofHom U.subtype) :=
(mono_iff_ker_eq_bot _).mpr (Submodule.ker_subtype U)
| instance epi_as_hom''_mkQ (U : Submodule R X) : Epi (ModuleCat.ofHom U.mkQ) :=
(epi_iff_range_eq_top _).mpr <| Submodule.range_mkQ _
| Mathlib/Algebra/Category/ModuleCat/EpiMono.lean | 56 | 57 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Iterate
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Cycle.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.NoncommPiCoprod
import Mathlib.Tactic.Group
/-!
# Cycle factors of a permutation
Let `β` be a `Fintype` and `f : Equiv.Perm β`.
* `Equiv.Perm.cycleOf`: `f.cycleOf x` is the cycle of `f` that `x` belongs to.
* `Equiv.Perm.cycleFactors`: `f.cycleFactors` is a list of disjoint cyclic permutations
that multiply to `f`.
-/
open Equiv Function Finset
variable {ι α β : Type*}
namespace Equiv.Perm
/-!
### `cycleOf`
-/
section CycleOf
variable {f g : Perm α} {x y : α}
/-- `f.cycleOf x` is the cycle of the permutation `f` to which `x` belongs. -/
def cycleOf (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) : Perm α :=
ofSubtype (subtypePerm f fun _ => sameCycle_apply_right.symm : Perm { y // SameCycle f x y })
theorem cycleOf_apply (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x y : α) :
cycleOf f x y = if SameCycle f x y then f y else y := by
dsimp only [cycleOf]
split_ifs with h
· apply ofSubtype_apply_of_mem
exact h
· apply ofSubtype_apply_of_not_mem
exact h
theorem cycleOf_inv (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) :
(cycleOf f x)⁻¹ = cycleOf f⁻¹ x :=
Equiv.ext fun y => by
rw [inv_eq_iff_eq, cycleOf_apply, cycleOf_apply]
split_ifs <;> simp_all [sameCycle_inv, sameCycle_inv_apply_right]
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_pow_apply_self (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) :
∀ n : ℕ, (cycleOf f x ^ n) x = (f ^ n) x := by
intro n
induction n with
| zero => rfl
| succ n hn =>
rw [pow_succ', mul_apply, cycleOf_apply, hn, if_pos, pow_succ', mul_apply]
exact ⟨n, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_zpow_apply_self (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) :
∀ n : ℤ, (cycleOf f x ^ n) x = (f ^ n) x := by
intro z
cases z with
| ofNat z => exact cycleOf_pow_apply_self f x z
| negSucc z =>
rw [zpow_negSucc, ← inv_pow, cycleOf_inv, zpow_negSucc, ← inv_pow, cycleOf_pow_apply_self]
theorem SameCycle.cycleOf_apply [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] :
SameCycle f x y → cycleOf f x y = f y :=
ofSubtype_apply_of_mem _
theorem cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] :
¬SameCycle f x y → cycleOf f x y = y :=
ofSubtype_apply_of_not_mem _
theorem SameCycle.cycleOf_eq [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (h : SameCycle f x y) :
cycleOf f x = cycleOf f y := by
ext z
rw [Equiv.Perm.cycleOf_apply]
split_ifs with hz
· exact (h.symm.trans hz).cycleOf_apply.symm
· exact (cycleOf_apply_of_not_sameCycle (mt h.trans hz)).symm
@[simp]
theorem cycleOf_apply_apply_zpow_self (f : Perm α) [DecidableRel f.SameCycle] (x : α) (k : ℤ) :
| cycleOf f x ((f ^ k) x) = (f ^ (k + 1) : Perm α) x := by
rw [SameCycle.cycleOf_apply]
· rw [add_comm, zpow_add, zpow_one, mul_apply]
· exact ⟨k, rfl⟩
@[simp]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Cycle/Factors.lean | 92 | 97 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Minchao Wu, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Attach
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Disjoint
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Erase
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Filter
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Range
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.SDiff
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Order.Directed
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.SymmDiff
/-!
# Basic lemmas on finite sets
This file contains lemmas on the interaction of various definitions on the `Finset` type.
For an explanation of `Finset` design decisions, please see `Mathlib/Data/Finset/Defs.lean`.
## Main declarations
### Main definitions
* `Finset.choose`: Given a proof `h` of existence and uniqueness of a certain element
satisfying a predicate, `choose s h` returns the element of `s` satisfying that predicate.
### Equivalences between finsets
* The `Mathlib/Logic/Equiv/Defs.lean` file describes a general type of equivalence, so look in there
for any lemmas. There is some API for rewriting sums and products from `s` to `t` given that
`s ≃ t`.
TODO: examples
## Tags
finite sets, finset
-/
-- Assert that we define `Finset` without the material on `List.sublists`.
-- Note that we cannot use `List.sublists` itself as that is defined very early.
assert_not_exists List.sublistsLen Multiset.powerset CompleteLattice Monoid
open Multiset Subtype Function
universe u
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
namespace Finset
-- TODO: these should be global attributes, but this will require fixing other files
attribute [local trans] Subset.trans Superset.trans
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {s : Finset α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf s := by
cases s
dsimp [SizeOf.sizeOf, SizeOf.sizeOf, Multiset.sizeOf]
rw [Nat.add_comm]
refine lt_trans ?_ (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
exact Multiset.sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem hx
/-! ### Lattice structure -/
section Lattice
variable [DecidableEq α] {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-! #### union -/
@[simp]
theorem disjUnion_eq_union (s t h) : @disjUnion α s t h = s ∪ t :=
ext fun a => by simp
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_union_left : Disjoint (s ∪ t) u ↔ Disjoint s u ∧ Disjoint t u := by
simp only [disjoint_left, mem_union, or_imp, forall_and]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_union_right : Disjoint s (t ∪ u) ↔ Disjoint s t ∧ Disjoint s u := by
simp only [disjoint_right, mem_union, or_imp, forall_and]
/-! #### inter -/
theorem not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter : ¬Disjoint s t ↔ (s ∩ t).Nonempty :=
not_disjoint_iff.trans <| by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.not_disjoint⟩ := not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter
theorem disjoint_or_nonempty_inter (s t : Finset α) : Disjoint s t ∨ (s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
exact em _
omit [DecidableEq α] in
theorem disjoint_of_subset_iff_left_eq_empty (h : s ⊆ t) :
Disjoint s t ↔ s = ∅ :=
disjoint_of_le_iff_left_eq_bot h
lemma pairwiseDisjoint_iff {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} {f : ι → Finset α} :
s.PairwiseDisjoint f ↔ ∀ ⦃i⦄, i ∈ s → ∀ ⦃j⦄, j ∈ s → (f i ∩ f j).Nonempty → i = j := by
simp [Set.PairwiseDisjoint, Set.Pairwise, Function.onFun, not_imp_comm (a := _ = _),
not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
end Lattice
instance isDirected_le : IsDirected (Finset α) (· ≤ ·) := by classical infer_instance
instance isDirected_subset : IsDirected (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) := isDirected_le
/-! ### erase -/
section Erase
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem erase_empty (a : α) : erase ∅ a = ∅ :=
rfl
protected lemma Nontrivial.erase_nonempty (hs : s.Nontrivial) : (s.erase a).Nonempty :=
(hs.exists_ne a).imp <| by aesop
@[simp] lemma erase_nonempty (ha : a ∈ s) : (s.erase a).Nonempty ↔ s.Nontrivial := by
simp only [Finset.Nonempty, mem_erase, and_comm (b := _ ∈ _)]
refine ⟨?_, fun hs ↦ hs.exists_ne a⟩
rintro ⟨b, hb, hba⟩
exact ⟨_, hb, _, ha, hba⟩
@[simp]
theorem erase_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Finset α).erase a = ∅ := by
ext x
simp
@[simp]
theorem erase_insert_eq_erase (s : Finset α) (a : α) : (insert a s).erase a = s.erase a :=
ext fun x => by
simp +contextual only [mem_erase, mem_insert, and_congr_right_iff,
false_or, iff_self, imp_true_iff]
theorem erase_insert {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∉ s) : erase (insert a s) a = s := by
rw [erase_insert_eq_erase, erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
theorem erase_insert_of_ne {a b : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ≠ b) :
erase (insert a s) b = insert a (erase s b) :=
ext fun x => by
have : x ≠ b ∧ x = a ↔ x = a := and_iff_right_of_imp fun hx => hx.symm ▸ h
simp only [mem_erase, mem_insert, and_or_left, this]
theorem erase_cons_of_ne {a b : α} {s : Finset α} (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : a ≠ b) :
erase (cons a s ha) b = cons a (erase s b) fun h => ha <| erase_subset _ _ h := by
simp only [cons_eq_insert, erase_insert_of_ne hb]
@[simp] theorem insert_erase (h : a ∈ s) : insert a (erase s a) = s :=
ext fun x => by
simp only [mem_insert, mem_erase, or_and_left, dec_em, true_and]
apply or_iff_right_of_imp
rintro rfl
exact h
lemma erase_eq_iff_eq_insert (hs : a ∈ s) (ht : a ∉ t) : erase s a = t ↔ s = insert a t := by
aesop
lemma insert_erase_invOn :
Set.InvOn (insert a) (fun s ↦ erase s a) {s : Finset α | a ∈ s} {s : Finset α | a ∉ s} :=
⟨fun _s ↦ insert_erase, fun _s ↦ erase_insert⟩
theorem erase_ssubset {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∈ s) : s.erase a ⊂ s :=
calc
s.erase a ⊂ insert a (s.erase a) := ssubset_insert <| not_mem_erase _ _
_ = _ := insert_erase h
theorem ssubset_iff_exists_subset_erase {s t : Finset α} : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ t, s ⊆ t.erase a := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨a, ha, h⟩ => ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset h <| erase_ssubset ha⟩
obtain ⟨a, ht, hs⟩ := not_subset.1 h.2
exact ⟨a, ht, subset_erase.2 ⟨h.1, hs⟩⟩
theorem erase_ssubset_insert (s : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a ⊂ insert a s :=
ssubset_iff_exists_subset_erase.2
⟨a, mem_insert_self _ _, erase_subset_erase _ <| subset_insert _ _⟩
theorem erase_cons {s : Finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) : (s.cons a h).erase a = s := by
rw [cons_eq_insert, erase_insert_eq_erase, erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
theorem subset_insert_iff {a : α} {s t : Finset α} : s ⊆ insert a t ↔ erase s a ⊆ t := by
simp only [subset_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left, mem_erase, mem_insert, and_imp]
exact forall_congr' fun x => forall_swap
theorem erase_insert_subset (a : α) (s : Finset α) : erase (insert a s) a ⊆ s :=
subset_insert_iff.1 <| Subset.rfl
theorem insert_erase_subset (a : α) (s : Finset α) : s ⊆ insert a (erase s a) :=
subset_insert_iff.2 <| Subset.rfl
theorem subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊆ insert a t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
rw [subset_insert_iff, erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
theorem erase_subset_iff_of_mem (h : a ∈ t) : s.erase a ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
rw [← subset_insert_iff, insert_eq_of_mem h]
theorem erase_injOn' (a : α) : { s : Finset α | a ∈ s }.InjOn fun s => erase s a :=
fun s hs t ht (h : s.erase a = _) => by rw [← insert_erase hs, ← insert_erase ht, h]
end Erase
lemma Nontrivial.exists_cons_eq {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nontrivial) :
∃ t a ha b hb hab, (cons b t hb).cons a (mem_cons.not.2 <| not_or_intro hab ha) = s := by
classical
obtain ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab⟩ := hs
have : b ∈ s.erase a := mem_erase.2 ⟨hab.symm, hb⟩
refine ⟨(s.erase a).erase b, a, ?_, b, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
simp [insert_erase this, insert_erase ha, *]
/-! ### sdiff -/
section Sdiff
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
lemma erase_sdiff_erase (hab : a ≠ b) (hb : b ∈ s) : s.erase a \ s.erase b = {b} := by
ext; aesop
-- TODO: Do we want to delete this lemma and `Finset.disjUnion_singleton`,
-- or instead add `Finset.union_singleton`/`Finset.singleton_union`?
theorem sdiff_singleton_eq_erase (a : α) (s : Finset α) : s \ {a} = erase s a := by
ext
rw [mem_erase, mem_sdiff, mem_singleton, and_comm]
-- This lemma matches `Finset.insert_eq` in functionality.
theorem erase_eq (s : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a = s \ {a} :=
(sdiff_singleton_eq_erase _ _).symm
theorem disjoint_erase_comm : Disjoint (s.erase a) t ↔ Disjoint s (t.erase a) := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, disjoint_sdiff_comm]
lemma disjoint_insert_erase (ha : a ∉ t) : Disjoint (s.erase a) (insert a t) ↔ Disjoint s t := by
rw [disjoint_erase_comm, erase_insert ha]
lemma disjoint_erase_insert (ha : a ∉ s) : Disjoint (insert a s) (t.erase a) ↔ Disjoint s t := by
rw [← disjoint_erase_comm, erase_insert ha]
theorem disjoint_of_erase_left (ha : a ∉ t) (hst : Disjoint (s.erase a) t) : Disjoint s t := by
rw [← erase_insert ha, ← disjoint_erase_comm, disjoint_insert_right]
exact ⟨not_mem_erase _ _, hst⟩
theorem disjoint_of_erase_right (ha : a ∉ s) (hst : Disjoint s (t.erase a)) : Disjoint s t := by
rw [← erase_insert ha, disjoint_erase_comm, disjoint_insert_left]
exact ⟨not_mem_erase _ _, hst⟩
theorem inter_erase (a : α) (s t : Finset α) : s ∩ t.erase a = (s ∩ t).erase a := by
simp only [erase_eq, inter_sdiff_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem erase_inter (a : α) (s t : Finset α) : s.erase a ∩ t = (s ∩ t).erase a := by
simpa only [inter_comm t] using inter_erase a t s
theorem erase_sdiff_comm (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a \ t = (s \ t).erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, sdiff_right_comm]
theorem erase_inter_comm (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a ∩ t = s ∩ t.erase a := by
rw [erase_inter, inter_erase]
theorem erase_union_distrib (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : (s ∪ t).erase a = s.erase a ∪ t.erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, union_sdiff_distrib]
theorem insert_inter_distrib (s t : Finset α) (a : α) :
insert a (s ∩ t) = insert a s ∩ insert a t := by simp_rw [insert_eq, union_inter_distrib_left]
theorem erase_sdiff_distrib (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : (s \ t).erase a = s.erase a \ t.erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, sdiff_sdiff, sup_sdiff_eq_sup le_rfl, sup_comm]
theorem erase_union_of_mem (ha : a ∈ t) (s : Finset α) : s.erase a ∪ t = s ∪ t := by
rw [← insert_erase (mem_union_right s ha), erase_union_distrib, ← union_insert, insert_erase ha]
theorem union_erase_of_mem (ha : a ∈ s) (t : Finset α) : s ∪ t.erase a = s ∪ t := by
rw [← insert_erase (mem_union_left t ha), erase_union_distrib, ← insert_union, insert_erase ha]
theorem sdiff_union_erase_cancel (hts : t ⊆ s) (ha : a ∈ t) : s \ t ∪ t.erase a = s.erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, sdiff_union_sdiff_cancel hts (singleton_subset_iff.2 ha)]
theorem sdiff_insert (s t : Finset α) (x : α) : s \ insert x t = (s \ t).erase x := by
simp_rw [← sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, insert_eq, sdiff_sdiff_left', sdiff_union_distrib,
inter_comm]
theorem sdiff_insert_insert_of_mem_of_not_mem {s t : Finset α} {x : α} (hxs : x ∈ s) (hxt : x ∉ t) :
insert x (s \ insert x t) = s \ t := by
rw [sdiff_insert, insert_erase (mem_sdiff.mpr ⟨hxs, hxt⟩)]
theorem sdiff_erase (h : a ∈ s) : s \ t.erase a = insert a (s \ t) := by
rw [← sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, sdiff_sdiff_eq_sdiff_union (singleton_subset_iff.2 h), insert_eq,
union_comm]
theorem sdiff_erase_self (ha : a ∈ s) : s \ s.erase a = {a} := by
rw [sdiff_erase ha, Finset.sdiff_self, insert_empty_eq]
theorem erase_eq_empty_iff (s : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ s = {a} := by
rw [← sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, sdiff_eq_empty_iff_subset, subset_singleton_iff]
--TODO@Yaël: Kill lemmas duplicate with `BooleanAlgebra`
theorem sdiff_disjoint : Disjoint (t \ s) s :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _a ha => (mem_sdiff.1 ha).2
theorem disjoint_sdiff : Disjoint s (t \ s) :=
sdiff_disjoint.symm
theorem disjoint_sdiff_inter (s t : Finset α) : Disjoint (s \ t) (s ∩ t) :=
disjoint_of_subset_right inter_subset_right sdiff_disjoint
end Sdiff
/-! ### attach -/
@[simp]
theorem attach_empty : attach (∅ : Finset α) = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem attach_nonempty_iff {s : Finset α} : s.attach.Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty := by
simp [Finset.Nonempty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected alias ⟨_, Nonempty.attach⟩ := attach_nonempty_iff
@[simp]
theorem attach_eq_empty_iff {s : Finset α} : s.attach = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
/-! ### filter -/
section Filter
variable (p q : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] {s t : Finset α}
theorem filter_singleton (a : α) : filter p {a} = if p a then {a} else ∅ := by
classical
ext x
simp only [mem_singleton, forall_eq, mem_filter]
split_ifs with h <;> by_cases h' : x = a <;> simp [h, h']
theorem filter_cons_of_pos (a : α) (s : Finset α) (ha : a ∉ s) (hp : p a) :
filter p (cons a s ha) = cons a (filter p s) ((mem_of_mem_filter _).mt ha) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.filter_cons_of_pos s.val hp
theorem filter_cons_of_neg (a : α) (s : Finset α) (ha : a ∉ s) (hp : ¬p a) :
filter p (cons a s ha) = filter p s :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.filter_cons_of_neg s.val hp
theorem disjoint_filter {s : Finset α} {p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] :
Disjoint (s.filter p) (s.filter q) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, p x → ¬q x := by
constructor <;> simp +contextual [disjoint_left]
theorem disjoint_filter_filter' (s t : Finset α)
{p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] (h : Disjoint p q) :
Disjoint (s.filter p) (t.filter q) := by
simp_rw [disjoint_left, mem_filter]
rintro a ⟨_, hp⟩ ⟨_, hq⟩
rw [Pi.disjoint_iff] at h
simpa [hp, hq] using h a
theorem disjoint_filter_filter_neg (s t : Finset α) (p : α → Prop)
[DecidablePred p] [∀ x, Decidable (¬p x)] :
Disjoint (s.filter p) (t.filter fun a => ¬p a) :=
disjoint_filter_filter' s t disjoint_compl_right
theorem filter_disj_union (s : Finset α) (t : Finset α) (h : Disjoint s t) :
filter p (disjUnion s t h) = (filter p s).disjUnion (filter p t) (disjoint_filter_filter h) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.filter_add _ _ _
theorem filter_cons {a : α} (s : Finset α) (ha : a ∉ s) :
filter p (cons a s ha) =
if p a then cons a (filter p s) ((mem_of_mem_filter _).mt ha) else filter p s := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos _ _ _ ha h]
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg _ _ _ ha h]
section
variable [DecidableEq α]
theorem filter_union (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : (s₁ ∪ s₂).filter p = s₁.filter p ∪ s₂.filter p :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_filter, mem_union, or_and_right]
theorem filter_union_right (s : Finset α) : s.filter p ∪ s.filter q = s.filter fun x => p x ∨ q x :=
ext fun x => by simp [mem_filter, mem_union, ← and_or_left]
theorem filter_mem_eq_inter {s t : Finset α} [∀ i, Decidable (i ∈ t)] :
(s.filter fun i => i ∈ t) = s ∩ t :=
ext fun i => by simp [mem_filter, mem_inter]
theorem filter_inter_distrib (s t : Finset α) : (s ∩ t).filter p = s.filter p ∩ t.filter p := by
ext
simp [mem_filter, mem_inter, and_assoc]
theorem filter_inter (s t : Finset α) : filter p s ∩ t = filter p (s ∩ t) := by
ext
simp only [mem_inter, mem_filter, and_right_comm]
theorem inter_filter (s t : Finset α) : s ∩ filter p t = filter p (s ∩ t) := by
rw [inter_comm, filter_inter, inter_comm]
theorem filter_insert (a : α) (s : Finset α) :
filter p (insert a s) = if p a then insert a (filter p s) else filter p s := by
ext x
split_ifs with h <;> by_cases h' : x = a <;> simp [h, h']
theorem filter_erase (a : α) (s : Finset α) : filter p (erase s a) = erase (filter p s) a := by
ext x
simp only [and_assoc, mem_filter, iff_self, mem_erase]
theorem filter_or (s : Finset α) : (s.filter fun a => p a ∨ q a) = s.filter p ∪ s.filter q :=
ext fun _ => by simp [mem_filter, mem_union, and_or_left]
theorem filter_and (s : Finset α) : (s.filter fun a => p a ∧ q a) = s.filter p ∩ s.filter q :=
ext fun _ => by simp [mem_filter, mem_inter, and_comm, and_left_comm, and_self_iff, and_assoc]
theorem filter_not (s : Finset α) : (s.filter fun a => ¬p a) = s \ s.filter p :=
ext fun a => by
simp only [Bool.decide_coe, Bool.not_eq_true', mem_filter, and_comm, mem_sdiff, not_and_or,
Bool.not_eq_true, and_or_left, and_not_self, or_false]
lemma filter_and_not (s : Finset α) (p q : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] :
s.filter (fun a ↦ p a ∧ ¬ q a) = s.filter p \ s.filter q := by
rw [filter_and, filter_not, ← inter_sdiff_assoc, inter_eq_left.2 (filter_subset _ _)]
theorem sdiff_eq_filter (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : s₁ \ s₂ = filter (· ∉ s₂) s₁ :=
ext fun _ => by simp [mem_sdiff, mem_filter]
theorem subset_union_elim {s : Finset α} {t₁ t₂ : Set α} (h : ↑s ⊆ t₁ ∪ t₂) :
∃ s₁ s₂ : Finset α, s₁ ∪ s₂ = s ∧ ↑s₁ ⊆ t₁ ∧ ↑s₂ ⊆ t₂ \ t₁ := by
classical
refine ⟨s.filter (· ∈ t₁), s.filter (· ∉ t₁), ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp [filter_union_right, em]
· intro x
simp
· intro x
simp only [not_not, coe_filter, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_diff, and_imp]
intro hx hx₂
exact ⟨Or.resolve_left (h hx) hx₂, hx₂⟩
-- This is not a good simp lemma, as it would prevent `Finset.mem_filter` from firing
-- on, e.g. `x ∈ s.filter (Eq b)`.
/-- After filtering out everything that does not equal a given value, at most that value remains.
This is equivalent to `filter_eq'` with the equality the other way.
-/
theorem filter_eq [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset β) (b : β) :
s.filter (Eq b) = ite (b ∈ s) {b} ∅ := by
split_ifs with h
· ext
simp only [mem_filter, mem_singleton, decide_eq_true_eq]
refine ⟨fun h => h.2.symm, ?_⟩
rintro rfl
exact ⟨h, rfl⟩
· ext
simp only [mem_filter, not_and, iff_false, not_mem_empty, decide_eq_true_eq]
rintro m rfl
exact h m
/-- After filtering out everything that does not equal a given value, at most that value remains.
This is equivalent to `filter_eq` with the equality the other way.
-/
theorem filter_eq' [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset β) (b : β) :
(s.filter fun a => a = b) = ite (b ∈ s) {b} ∅ :=
_root_.trans (filter_congr fun _ _ => by simp_rw [@eq_comm _ b]) (filter_eq s b)
theorem filter_ne [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset β) (b : β) :
(s.filter fun a => b ≠ a) = s.erase b := by
ext
simp only [mem_filter, mem_erase, Ne, decide_not, Bool.not_eq_true', decide_eq_false_iff_not]
tauto
theorem filter_ne' [DecidableEq β] (s : Finset β) (b : β) : (s.filter fun a => a ≠ b) = s.erase b :=
_root_.trans (filter_congr fun _ _ => by simp_rw [@ne_comm _ b]) (filter_ne s b)
theorem filter_union_filter_of_codisjoint (s : Finset α) (h : Codisjoint p q) :
s.filter p ∪ s.filter q = s :=
(filter_or _ _ _).symm.trans <| filter_true_of_mem fun x _ => h.top_le x trivial
theorem filter_union_filter_neg_eq [∀ x, Decidable (¬p x)] (s : Finset α) :
(s.filter p ∪ s.filter fun a => ¬p a) = s :=
filter_union_filter_of_codisjoint _ _ _ <| @codisjoint_hnot_right _ _ p
end
end Filter
/-! ### range -/
section Range
open Nat
variable {n m l : ℕ}
@[simp]
theorem range_filter_eq {n m : ℕ} : (range n).filter (· = m) = if m < n then {m} else ∅ := by
convert filter_eq (range n) m using 2
· ext
rw [eq_comm]
· simp
end Range
end Finset
/-! ### dedup on list and multiset -/
namespace Multiset
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t : Multiset α}
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_add (s t : Multiset α) : toFinset (s + t) = toFinset s ∪ toFinset t :=
Finset.ext <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_inter (s t : Multiset α) : toFinset (s ∩ t) = toFinset s ∩ toFinset t :=
Finset.ext <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_union (s t : Multiset α) : (s ∪ t).toFinset = s.toFinset ∪ t.toFinset := by
ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_eq_empty {m : Multiset α} : m.toFinset = ∅ ↔ m = 0 :=
Finset.val_inj.symm.trans Multiset.dedup_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_nonempty : s.toFinset.Nonempty ↔ s ≠ 0 := by
simp only [toFinset_eq_empty, Ne, Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
protected alias ⟨_, Aesop.toFinset_nonempty_of_ne⟩ := toFinset_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_filter (s : Multiset α) (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
Multiset.toFinset (s.filter p) = s.toFinset.filter p := by
ext; simp
end Multiset
namespace List
variable [DecidableEq α] {l l' : List α} {a : α} {f : α → β}
{s : Finset α} {t : Set β} {t' : Finset β}
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_union (l l' : List α) : (l ∪ l').toFinset = l.toFinset ∪ l'.toFinset := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_inter (l l' : List α) : (l ∩ l').toFinset = l.toFinset ∩ l'.toFinset := by
ext
simp
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.toFinset_nonempty_of_ne⟩ := toFinset_nonempty_iff
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_filter (s : List α) (p : α → Bool) :
(s.filter p).toFinset = s.toFinset.filter (p ·) := by
ext; simp [List.mem_filter]
end List
namespace Finset
section ToList
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_nil {s : Finset α} : s.toList = [] ↔ s = ∅ :=
Multiset.toList_eq_nil.trans val_eq_zero
theorem empty_toList {s : Finset α} : s.toList.isEmpty ↔ s = ∅ := by simp
@[simp]
theorem toList_empty : (∅ : Finset α).toList = [] :=
toList_eq_nil.mpr rfl
theorem Nonempty.toList_ne_nil {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nonempty) : s.toList ≠ [] :=
mt toList_eq_nil.mp hs.ne_empty
theorem Nonempty.not_empty_toList {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nonempty) : ¬s.toList.isEmpty :=
mt empty_toList.mp hs.ne_empty
end ToList
/-! ### choose -/
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : Finset α)
/-- Given a finset `l` and a predicate `p`, associate to a proof that there is a unique element of
`l` satisfying `p` this unique element, as an element of the corresponding subtype. -/
def chooseX (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : { a // a ∈ l ∧ p a } :=
Multiset.chooseX p l.val hp
/-- Given a finset `l` and a predicate `p`, associate to a proof that there is a unique element of
`l` satisfying `p` this unique element, as an element of the ambient type. -/
def choose (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : α :=
chooseX p l hp
theorem choose_spec (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(chooseX p l hp).property
theorem choose_mem (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).1
theorem choose_property (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).2
end Choose
end Finset
namespace Equiv
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t : Finset α}
open Finset
/-- The disjoint union of finsets is a sum -/
def Finset.union (s t : Finset α) (h : Disjoint s t) :
s ⊕ t ≃ (s ∪ t : Finset α) :=
Equiv.setCongr (coe_union _ _) |>.trans (Equiv.Set.union (disjoint_coe.mpr h)) |>.symm
@[simp]
theorem Finset.union_symm_inl (h : Disjoint s t) (x : s) :
Equiv.Finset.union s t h (Sum.inl x) = ⟨x, Finset.mem_union.mpr <| Or.inl x.2⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Finset.union_symm_inr (h : Disjoint s t) (y : t) :
Equiv.Finset.union s t h (Sum.inr y) = ⟨y, Finset.mem_union.mpr <| Or.inr y.2⟩ :=
rfl
/-- The type of dependent functions on the disjoint union of finsets `s ∪ t` is equivalent to the
type of pairs of functions on `s` and on `t`. This is similar to `Equiv.sumPiEquivProdPi`. -/
def piFinsetUnion {ι} [DecidableEq ι] (α : ι → Type*) {s t : Finset ι} (h : Disjoint s t) :
((∀ i : s, α i) × ∀ i : t, α i) ≃ ∀ i : (s ∪ t : Finset ι), α i :=
let e := Equiv.Finset.union s t h
sumPiEquivProdPi (fun b ↦ α (e b)) |>.symm.trans (.piCongrLeft (fun i : ↥(s ∪ t) ↦ α i) e)
/-- A finset is equivalent to its coercion as a set. -/
def _root_.Finset.equivToSet (s : Finset α) : s ≃ s.toSet where
toFun a := ⟨a.1, mem_coe.2 a.2⟩
invFun a := ⟨a.1, mem_coe.1 a.2⟩
left_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl
right_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl
end Equiv
namespace Multiset
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
lemma toFinset_replicate (n : ℕ) (a : α) :
(replicate n a).toFinset = if n = 0 then ∅ else {a} := by
ext x
simp only [mem_toFinset, Finset.mem_singleton, mem_replicate]
split_ifs with hn <;> simp [hn]
end Multiset
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Basic.lean | 829 | 830 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.Directed
import Mathlib.Order.BoundedOrder.Monotone
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
/-!
# Upper / lower bounds
In this file we prove various lemmas about upper/lower bounds of a set:
monotonicity, behaviour under `∪`, `∩`, `insert`,
and provide formulas for `∅`, `univ`, and intervals.
-/
open Function Set
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
universe u v
variable {α : Type u} {γ : Type v}
section
variable [Preorder α] {s t : Set α} {a b : α}
theorem mem_upperBounds : a ∈ upperBounds s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, x ≤ a :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_lowerBounds : a ∈ lowerBounds s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, a ≤ x :=
Iff.rfl
lemma mem_upperBounds_iff_subset_Iic : a ∈ upperBounds s ↔ s ⊆ Iic a := Iff.rfl
lemma mem_lowerBounds_iff_subset_Ici : a ∈ lowerBounds s ↔ s ⊆ Ici a := Iff.rfl
theorem bddAbove_def : BddAbove s ↔ ∃ x, ∀ y ∈ s, y ≤ x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem bddBelow_def : BddBelow s ↔ ∃ x, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≤ y :=
Iff.rfl
theorem bot_mem_lowerBounds [OrderBot α] (s : Set α) : ⊥ ∈ lowerBounds s := fun _ _ => bot_le
theorem top_mem_upperBounds [OrderTop α] (s : Set α) : ⊤ ∈ upperBounds s := fun _ _ => le_top
@[simp]
theorem isLeast_bot_iff [OrderBot α] : IsLeast s ⊥ ↔ ⊥ ∈ s :=
and_iff_left <| bot_mem_lowerBounds _
@[simp]
theorem isGreatest_top_iff [OrderTop α] : IsGreatest s ⊤ ↔ ⊤ ∈ s :=
and_iff_left <| top_mem_upperBounds _
/-- A set `s` is not bounded above if and only if for each `x` there exists `y ∈ s` such that `x`
is not greater than or equal to `y`. This version only assumes `Preorder` structure and uses
`¬(y ≤ x)`. A version for linear orders is called `not_bddAbove_iff`. -/
theorem not_bddAbove_iff' : ¬BddAbove s ↔ ∀ x, ∃ y ∈ s, ¬y ≤ x := by
simp [BddAbove, upperBounds, Set.Nonempty]
/-- A set `s` is not bounded below if and only if for each `x` there exists `y ∈ s` such that `x`
is not less than or equal to `y`. This version only assumes `Preorder` structure and uses
`¬(x ≤ y)`. A version for linear orders is called `not_bddBelow_iff`. -/
theorem not_bddBelow_iff' : ¬BddBelow s ↔ ∀ x, ∃ y ∈ s, ¬x ≤ y :=
@not_bddAbove_iff' αᵒᵈ _ _
/-- A set `s` is not bounded above if and only if for each `x` there exists `y ∈ s` that is greater
than `x`. A version for preorders is called `not_bddAbove_iff'`. -/
theorem not_bddAbove_iff {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] {s : Set α} :
¬BddAbove s ↔ ∀ x, ∃ y ∈ s, x < y := by
simp only [not_bddAbove_iff', not_le]
/-- A set `s` is not bounded below if and only if for each `x` there exists `y ∈ s` that is less
than `x`. A version for preorders is called `not_bddBelow_iff'`. -/
theorem not_bddBelow_iff {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] {s : Set α} :
¬BddBelow s ↔ ∀ x, ∃ y ∈ s, y < x :=
@not_bddAbove_iff αᵒᵈ _ _
@[simp] lemma bddBelow_preimage_ofDual {s : Set α} : BddBelow (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ BddAbove s := Iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma bddAbove_preimage_ofDual {s : Set α} : BddAbove (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ BddBelow s := Iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma bddBelow_preimage_toDual {s : Set αᵒᵈ} :
BddBelow (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ BddAbove s := Iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma bddAbove_preimage_toDual {s : Set αᵒᵈ} :
BddAbove (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ BddBelow s := Iff.rfl
theorem BddAbove.dual (h : BddAbove s) : BddBelow (ofDual ⁻¹' s) :=
h
theorem BddBelow.dual (h : BddBelow s) : BddAbove (ofDual ⁻¹' s) :=
h
theorem IsLeast.dual (h : IsLeast s a) : IsGreatest (ofDual ⁻¹' s) (toDual a) :=
h
theorem IsGreatest.dual (h : IsGreatest s a) : IsLeast (ofDual ⁻¹' s) (toDual a) :=
h
theorem IsLUB.dual (h : IsLUB s a) : IsGLB (ofDual ⁻¹' s) (toDual a) :=
h
theorem IsGLB.dual (h : IsGLB s a) : IsLUB (ofDual ⁻¹' s) (toDual a) :=
h
/-- If `a` is the least element of a set `s`, then subtype `s` is an order with bottom element. -/
abbrev IsLeast.orderBot (h : IsLeast s a) :
OrderBot s where
bot := ⟨a, h.1⟩
bot_le := Subtype.forall.2 h.2
/-- If `a` is the greatest element of a set `s`, then subtype `s` is an order with top element. -/
abbrev IsGreatest.orderTop (h : IsGreatest s a) :
OrderTop s where
top := ⟨a, h.1⟩
le_top := Subtype.forall.2 h.2
theorem isLUB_congr (h : upperBounds s = upperBounds t) : IsLUB s a ↔ IsLUB t a := by
rw [IsLUB, IsLUB, h]
theorem isGLB_congr (h : lowerBounds s = lowerBounds t) : IsGLB s a ↔ IsGLB t a := by
rw [IsGLB, IsGLB, h]
/-!
### Monotonicity
-/
theorem upperBounds_mono_set ⦃s t : Set α⦄ (hst : s ⊆ t) : upperBounds t ⊆ upperBounds s :=
fun _ hb _ h => hb <| hst h
theorem lowerBounds_mono_set ⦃s t : Set α⦄ (hst : s ⊆ t) : lowerBounds t ⊆ lowerBounds s :=
fun _ hb _ h => hb <| hst h
theorem upperBounds_mono_mem ⦃a b⦄ (hab : a ≤ b) : a ∈ upperBounds s → b ∈ upperBounds s :=
fun ha _ h => le_trans (ha h) hab
theorem lowerBounds_mono_mem ⦃a b⦄ (hab : a ≤ b) : b ∈ lowerBounds s → a ∈ lowerBounds s :=
fun hb _ h => le_trans hab (hb h)
theorem upperBounds_mono ⦃s t : Set α⦄ (hst : s ⊆ t) ⦃a b⦄ (hab : a ≤ b) :
a ∈ upperBounds t → b ∈ upperBounds s := fun ha =>
upperBounds_mono_set hst <| upperBounds_mono_mem hab ha
theorem lowerBounds_mono ⦃s t : Set α⦄ (hst : s ⊆ t) ⦃a b⦄ (hab : a ≤ b) :
b ∈ lowerBounds t → a ∈ lowerBounds s := fun hb =>
lowerBounds_mono_set hst <| lowerBounds_mono_mem hab hb
/-- If `s ⊆ t` and `t` is bounded above, then so is `s`. -/
theorem BddAbove.mono ⦃s t : Set α⦄ (h : s ⊆ t) : BddAbove t → BddAbove s :=
Nonempty.mono <| upperBounds_mono_set h
/-- If `s ⊆ t` and `t` is bounded below, then so is `s`. -/
theorem BddBelow.mono ⦃s t : Set α⦄ (h : s ⊆ t) : BddBelow t → BddBelow s :=
Nonempty.mono <| lowerBounds_mono_set h
/-- If `a` is a least upper bound for sets `s` and `p`, then it is a least upper bound for any
set `t`, `s ⊆ t ⊆ p`. -/
theorem IsLUB.of_subset_of_superset {s t p : Set α} (hs : IsLUB s a) (hp : IsLUB p a) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(htp : t ⊆ p) : IsLUB t a :=
⟨upperBounds_mono_set htp hp.1, lowerBounds_mono_set (upperBounds_mono_set hst) hs.2⟩
/-- If `a` is a greatest lower bound for sets `s` and `p`, then it is a greater lower bound for any
set `t`, `s ⊆ t ⊆ p`. -/
theorem IsGLB.of_subset_of_superset {s t p : Set α} (hs : IsGLB s a) (hp : IsGLB p a) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(htp : t ⊆ p) : IsGLB t a :=
hs.dual.of_subset_of_superset hp hst htp
theorem IsLeast.mono (ha : IsLeast s a) (hb : IsLeast t b) (hst : s ⊆ t) : b ≤ a :=
hb.2 (hst ha.1)
theorem IsGreatest.mono (ha : IsGreatest s a) (hb : IsGreatest t b) (hst : s ⊆ t) : a ≤ b :=
hb.2 (hst ha.1)
theorem IsLUB.mono (ha : IsLUB s a) (hb : IsLUB t b) (hst : s ⊆ t) : a ≤ b :=
IsLeast.mono hb ha <| upperBounds_mono_set hst
theorem IsGLB.mono (ha : IsGLB s a) (hb : IsGLB t b) (hst : s ⊆ t) : b ≤ a :=
IsGreatest.mono hb ha <| lowerBounds_mono_set hst
theorem subset_lowerBounds_upperBounds (s : Set α) : s ⊆ lowerBounds (upperBounds s) :=
fun _ hx _ hy => hy hx
theorem subset_upperBounds_lowerBounds (s : Set α) : s ⊆ upperBounds (lowerBounds s) :=
fun _ hx _ hy => hy hx
theorem Set.Nonempty.bddAbove_lowerBounds (hs : s.Nonempty) : BddAbove (lowerBounds s) :=
hs.mono (subset_upperBounds_lowerBounds s)
theorem Set.Nonempty.bddBelow_upperBounds (hs : s.Nonempty) : BddBelow (upperBounds s) :=
hs.mono (subset_lowerBounds_upperBounds s)
/-!
### Conversions
-/
theorem IsLeast.isGLB (h : IsLeast s a) : IsGLB s a :=
⟨h.2, fun _ hb => hb h.1⟩
theorem IsGreatest.isLUB (h : IsGreatest s a) : IsLUB s a :=
⟨h.2, fun _ hb => hb h.1⟩
theorem IsLUB.upperBounds_eq (h : IsLUB s a) : upperBounds s = Ici a :=
Set.ext fun _ => ⟨fun hb => h.2 hb, fun hb => upperBounds_mono_mem hb h.1⟩
theorem IsGLB.lowerBounds_eq (h : IsGLB s a) : lowerBounds s = Iic a :=
h.dual.upperBounds_eq
theorem IsLeast.lowerBounds_eq (h : IsLeast s a) : lowerBounds s = Iic a :=
h.isGLB.lowerBounds_eq
theorem IsGreatest.upperBounds_eq (h : IsGreatest s a) : upperBounds s = Ici a :=
h.isLUB.upperBounds_eq
theorem IsGreatest.lt_iff (h : IsGreatest s a) : a < b ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, x < b :=
⟨fun hlt _x hx => (h.2 hx).trans_lt hlt, fun h' => h' _ h.1⟩
theorem IsLeast.lt_iff (h : IsLeast s a) : b < a ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, b < x :=
h.dual.lt_iff
theorem isLUB_le_iff (h : IsLUB s a) : a ≤ b ↔ b ∈ upperBounds s := by
rw [h.upperBounds_eq]
rfl
theorem le_isGLB_iff (h : IsGLB s a) : b ≤ a ↔ b ∈ lowerBounds s := by
rw [h.lowerBounds_eq]
rfl
theorem isLUB_iff_le_iff : IsLUB s a ↔ ∀ b, a ≤ b ↔ b ∈ upperBounds s :=
⟨fun h _ => isLUB_le_iff h, fun H => ⟨(H _).1 le_rfl, fun b hb => (H b).2 hb⟩⟩
theorem isGLB_iff_le_iff : IsGLB s a ↔ ∀ b, b ≤ a ↔ b ∈ lowerBounds s :=
@isLUB_iff_le_iff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
/-- If `s` has a least upper bound, then it is bounded above. -/
theorem IsLUB.bddAbove (h : IsLUB s a) : BddAbove s :=
⟨a, h.1⟩
/-- If `s` has a greatest lower bound, then it is bounded below. -/
theorem IsGLB.bddBelow (h : IsGLB s a) : BddBelow s :=
⟨a, h.1⟩
/-- If `s` has a greatest element, then it is bounded above. -/
theorem IsGreatest.bddAbove (h : IsGreatest s a) : BddAbove s :=
⟨a, h.2⟩
/-- If `s` has a least element, then it is bounded below. -/
theorem IsLeast.bddBelow (h : IsLeast s a) : BddBelow s :=
⟨a, h.2⟩
theorem IsLeast.nonempty (h : IsLeast s a) : s.Nonempty :=
⟨a, h.1⟩
theorem IsGreatest.nonempty (h : IsGreatest s a) : s.Nonempty :=
⟨a, h.1⟩
/-!
### Union and intersection
-/
@[simp]
theorem upperBounds_union : upperBounds (s ∪ t) = upperBounds s ∩ upperBounds t :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ hb => ⟨fun _ hx => hb (Or.inl hx), fun _ hx => hb (Or.inr hx)⟩)
fun _ hb _ hx => hx.elim (fun hs => hb.1 hs) fun ht => hb.2 ht
@[simp]
theorem lowerBounds_union : lowerBounds (s ∪ t) = lowerBounds s ∩ lowerBounds t :=
@upperBounds_union αᵒᵈ _ s t
theorem union_upperBounds_subset_upperBounds_inter :
upperBounds s ∪ upperBounds t ⊆ upperBounds (s ∩ t) :=
union_subset (upperBounds_mono_set inter_subset_left)
(upperBounds_mono_set inter_subset_right)
theorem union_lowerBounds_subset_lowerBounds_inter :
lowerBounds s ∪ lowerBounds t ⊆ lowerBounds (s ∩ t) :=
@union_upperBounds_subset_upperBounds_inter αᵒᵈ _ s t
theorem isLeast_union_iff {a : α} {s t : Set α} :
IsLeast (s ∪ t) a ↔ IsLeast s a ∧ a ∈ lowerBounds t ∨ a ∈ lowerBounds s ∧ IsLeast t a := by
simp [IsLeast, lowerBounds_union, or_and_right, and_comm (a := a ∈ t), and_assoc]
theorem isGreatest_union_iff :
IsGreatest (s ∪ t) a ↔
IsGreatest s a ∧ a ∈ upperBounds t ∨ a ∈ upperBounds s ∧ IsGreatest t a :=
@isLeast_union_iff αᵒᵈ _ a s t
/-- If `s` is bounded, then so is `s ∩ t` -/
theorem BddAbove.inter_of_left (h : BddAbove s) : BddAbove (s ∩ t) :=
h.mono inter_subset_left
/-- If `t` is bounded, then so is `s ∩ t` -/
theorem BddAbove.inter_of_right (h : BddAbove t) : BddAbove (s ∩ t) :=
h.mono inter_subset_right
/-- If `s` is bounded, then so is `s ∩ t` -/
theorem BddBelow.inter_of_left (h : BddBelow s) : BddBelow (s ∩ t) :=
h.mono inter_subset_left
/-- If `t` is bounded, then so is `s ∩ t` -/
theorem BddBelow.inter_of_right (h : BddBelow t) : BddBelow (s ∩ t) :=
h.mono inter_subset_right
/-- In a directed order, the union of bounded above sets is bounded above. -/
theorem BddAbove.union [IsDirected α (· ≤ ·)] {s t : Set α} :
BddAbove s → BddAbove t → BddAbove (s ∪ t) := by
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩
obtain ⟨c, hca, hcb⟩ := exists_ge_ge a b
rw [BddAbove, upperBounds_union]
exact ⟨c, upperBounds_mono_mem hca ha, upperBounds_mono_mem hcb hb⟩
/-- In a directed order, the union of two sets is bounded above if and only if both sets are. -/
theorem bddAbove_union [IsDirected α (· ≤ ·)] {s t : Set α} :
BddAbove (s ∪ t) ↔ BddAbove s ∧ BddAbove t :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.mono subset_union_left, h.mono subset_union_right⟩, fun h =>
h.1.union h.2⟩
/-- In a codirected order, the union of bounded below sets is bounded below. -/
theorem BddBelow.union [IsDirected α (· ≥ ·)] {s t : Set α} :
BddBelow s → BddBelow t → BddBelow (s ∪ t) :=
@BddAbove.union αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
/-- In a codirected order, the union of two sets is bounded below if and only if both sets are. -/
theorem bddBelow_union [IsDirected α (· ≥ ·)] {s t : Set α} :
BddBelow (s ∪ t) ↔ BddBelow s ∧ BddBelow t :=
@bddAbove_union αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
/-- If `a` is the least upper bound of `s` and `b` is the least upper bound of `t`,
then `a ⊔ b` is the least upper bound of `s ∪ t`. -/
theorem IsLUB.union [SemilatticeSup γ] {a b : γ} {s t : Set γ} (hs : IsLUB s a) (ht : IsLUB t b) :
IsLUB (s ∪ t) (a ⊔ b) :=
⟨fun _ h =>
h.casesOn (fun h => le_sup_of_le_left <| hs.left h) fun h => le_sup_of_le_right <| ht.left h,
fun _ hc =>
sup_le (hs.right fun _ hd => hc <| Or.inl hd) (ht.right fun _ hd => hc <| Or.inr hd)⟩
/-- If `a` is the greatest lower bound of `s` and `b` is the greatest lower bound of `t`,
then `a ⊓ b` is the greatest lower bound of `s ∪ t`. -/
theorem IsGLB.union [SemilatticeInf γ] {a₁ a₂ : γ} {s t : Set γ} (hs : IsGLB s a₁)
(ht : IsGLB t a₂) : IsGLB (s ∪ t) (a₁ ⊓ a₂) :=
hs.dual.union ht
/-- If `a` is the least element of `s` and `b` is the least element of `t`,
then `min a b` is the least element of `s ∪ t`. -/
theorem IsLeast.union [LinearOrder γ] {a b : γ} {s t : Set γ} (ha : IsLeast s a)
(hb : IsLeast t b) : IsLeast (s ∪ t) (min a b) :=
⟨by rcases le_total a b with h | h <;> simp [h, ha.1, hb.1], (ha.isGLB.union hb.isGLB).1⟩
/-- If `a` is the greatest element of `s` and `b` is the greatest element of `t`,
then `max a b` is the greatest element of `s ∪ t`. -/
theorem IsGreatest.union [LinearOrder γ] {a b : γ} {s t : Set γ} (ha : IsGreatest s a)
(hb : IsGreatest t b) : IsGreatest (s ∪ t) (max a b) :=
⟨by rcases le_total a b with h | h <;> simp [h, ha.1, hb.1], (ha.isLUB.union hb.isLUB).1⟩
theorem IsLUB.inter_Ici_of_mem [LinearOrder γ] {s : Set γ} {a b : γ} (ha : IsLUB s a) (hb : b ∈ s) :
IsLUB (s ∩ Ici b) a :=
⟨fun _ hx => ha.1 hx.1, fun c hc =>
have hbc : b ≤ c := hc ⟨hb, le_rfl⟩
ha.2 fun x hx => ((le_total x b).elim fun hxb => hxb.trans hbc) fun hbx => hc ⟨hx, hbx⟩⟩
theorem IsGLB.inter_Iic_of_mem [LinearOrder γ] {s : Set γ} {a b : γ} (ha : IsGLB s a) (hb : b ∈ s) :
IsGLB (s ∩ Iic b) a :=
ha.dual.inter_Ici_of_mem hb
theorem bddAbove_iff_exists_ge [SemilatticeSup γ] {s : Set γ} (x₀ : γ) :
BddAbove s ↔ ∃ x, x₀ ≤ x ∧ ∀ y ∈ s, y ≤ x := by
rw [bddAbove_def, exists_ge_and_iff_exists]
exact Monotone.ball fun x _ => monotone_le
theorem bddBelow_iff_exists_le [SemilatticeInf γ] {s : Set γ} (x₀ : γ) :
BddBelow s ↔ ∃ x, x ≤ x₀ ∧ ∀ y ∈ s, x ≤ y :=
bddAbove_iff_exists_ge (toDual x₀)
theorem BddAbove.exists_ge [SemilatticeSup γ] {s : Set γ} (hs : BddAbove s) (x₀ : γ) :
∃ x, x₀ ≤ x ∧ ∀ y ∈ s, y ≤ x :=
(bddAbove_iff_exists_ge x₀).mp hs
theorem BddBelow.exists_le [SemilatticeInf γ] {s : Set γ} (hs : BddBelow s) (x₀ : γ) :
∃ x, x ≤ x₀ ∧ ∀ y ∈ s, x ≤ y :=
(bddBelow_iff_exists_le x₀).mp hs
/-!
### Specific sets
#### Unbounded intervals
-/
theorem isLeast_Ici : IsLeast (Ici a) a :=
⟨left_mem_Ici, fun _ => id⟩
theorem isGreatest_Iic : IsGreatest (Iic a) a :=
⟨right_mem_Iic, fun _ => id⟩
theorem isLUB_Iic : IsLUB (Iic a) a :=
isGreatest_Iic.isLUB
theorem isGLB_Ici : IsGLB (Ici a) a :=
isLeast_Ici.isGLB
theorem upperBounds_Iic : upperBounds (Iic a) = Ici a :=
isLUB_Iic.upperBounds_eq
theorem lowerBounds_Ici : lowerBounds (Ici a) = Iic a :=
isGLB_Ici.lowerBounds_eq
theorem bddAbove_Iic : BddAbove (Iic a) :=
isLUB_Iic.bddAbove
theorem bddBelow_Ici : BddBelow (Ici a) :=
isGLB_Ici.bddBelow
theorem bddAbove_Iio : BddAbove (Iio a) :=
⟨a, fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx⟩
theorem bddBelow_Ioi : BddBelow (Ioi a) :=
⟨a, fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx⟩
theorem lub_Iio_le (a : α) (hb : IsLUB (Iio a) b) : b ≤ a :=
(isLUB_le_iff hb).mpr fun _ hk => le_of_lt hk
theorem le_glb_Ioi (a : α) (hb : IsGLB (Ioi a) b) : a ≤ b :=
@lub_Iio_le αᵒᵈ _ _ a hb
theorem lub_Iio_eq_self_or_Iio_eq_Iic [PartialOrder γ] {j : γ} (i : γ) (hj : IsLUB (Iio i) j) :
j = i ∨ Iio i = Iic j := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (lub_Iio_le i hj) with hj_eq_i | hj_lt_i
· exact Or.inl hj_eq_i
· right
exact Set.ext fun k => ⟨fun hk_lt => hj.1 hk_lt, fun hk_le_j => lt_of_le_of_lt hk_le_j hj_lt_i⟩
theorem glb_Ioi_eq_self_or_Ioi_eq_Ici [PartialOrder γ] {j : γ} (i : γ) (hj : IsGLB (Ioi i) j) :
j = i ∨ Ioi i = Ici j :=
@lub_Iio_eq_self_or_Iio_eq_Iic γᵒᵈ _ j i hj
section
variable [LinearOrder γ]
theorem exists_lub_Iio (i : γ) : ∃ j, IsLUB (Iio i) j := by
by_cases h_exists_lt : ∃ j, j ∈ upperBounds (Iio i) ∧ j < i
· obtain ⟨j, hj_ub, hj_lt_i⟩ := h_exists_lt
exact ⟨j, hj_ub, fun k hk_ub => hk_ub hj_lt_i⟩
· refine ⟨i, fun j hj => le_of_lt hj, ?_⟩
rw [mem_lowerBounds]
by_contra h
refine h_exists_lt ?_
push_neg at h
exact h
theorem exists_glb_Ioi (i : γ) : ∃ j, IsGLB (Ioi i) j :=
@exists_lub_Iio γᵒᵈ _ i
variable [DenselyOrdered γ]
theorem isLUB_Iio {a : γ} : IsLUB (Iio a) a :=
⟨fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx, fun _ hy => le_of_forall_lt_imp_le_of_dense hy⟩
theorem isGLB_Ioi {a : γ} : IsGLB (Ioi a) a :=
@isLUB_Iio γᵒᵈ _ _ a
theorem upperBounds_Iio {a : γ} : upperBounds (Iio a) = Ici a :=
isLUB_Iio.upperBounds_eq
theorem lowerBounds_Ioi {a : γ} : lowerBounds (Ioi a) = Iic a :=
isGLB_Ioi.lowerBounds_eq
end
/-!
#### Singleton
-/
@[simp] theorem isGreatest_singleton : IsGreatest {a} a :=
⟨mem_singleton a, fun _ hx => le_of_eq <| eq_of_mem_singleton hx⟩
@[simp] theorem isLeast_singleton : IsLeast {a} a :=
@isGreatest_singleton αᵒᵈ _ a
@[simp] theorem isLUB_singleton : IsLUB {a} a :=
isGreatest_singleton.isLUB
@[simp] theorem isGLB_singleton : IsGLB {a} a :=
isLeast_singleton.isGLB
@[simp] lemma bddAbove_singleton : BddAbove ({a} : Set α) := isLUB_singleton.bddAbove
@[simp] lemma bddBelow_singleton : BddBelow ({a} : Set α) := isGLB_singleton.bddBelow
@[simp]
theorem upperBounds_singleton : upperBounds {a} = Ici a :=
isLUB_singleton.upperBounds_eq
@[simp]
theorem lowerBounds_singleton : lowerBounds {a} = Iic a :=
isGLB_singleton.lowerBounds_eq
/-!
#### Bounded intervals
-/
theorem bddAbove_Icc : BddAbove (Icc a b) :=
⟨b, fun _ => And.right⟩
theorem bddBelow_Icc : BddBelow (Icc a b) :=
⟨a, fun _ => And.left⟩
theorem bddAbove_Ico : BddAbove (Ico a b) :=
bddAbove_Icc.mono Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem bddBelow_Ico : BddBelow (Ico a b) :=
bddBelow_Icc.mono Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem bddAbove_Ioc : BddAbove (Ioc a b) :=
bddAbove_Icc.mono Ioc_subset_Icc_self
theorem bddBelow_Ioc : BddBelow (Ioc a b) :=
bddBelow_Icc.mono Ioc_subset_Icc_self
theorem bddAbove_Ioo : BddAbove (Ioo a b) :=
bddAbove_Icc.mono Ioo_subset_Icc_self
theorem bddBelow_Ioo : BddBelow (Ioo a b) :=
bddBelow_Icc.mono Ioo_subset_Icc_self
theorem isGreatest_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : IsGreatest (Icc a b) b :=
⟨right_mem_Icc.2 h, fun _ => And.right⟩
theorem isLUB_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : IsLUB (Icc a b) b :=
(isGreatest_Icc h).isLUB
theorem upperBounds_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : upperBounds (Icc a b) = Ici b :=
(isLUB_Icc h).upperBounds_eq
theorem isLeast_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : IsLeast (Icc a b) a :=
⟨left_mem_Icc.2 h, fun _ => And.left⟩
theorem isGLB_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : IsGLB (Icc a b) a :=
(isLeast_Icc h).isGLB
theorem lowerBounds_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : lowerBounds (Icc a b) = Iic a :=
(isGLB_Icc h).lowerBounds_eq
theorem isGreatest_Ioc (h : a < b) : IsGreatest (Ioc a b) b :=
⟨right_mem_Ioc.2 h, fun _ => And.right⟩
theorem isLUB_Ioc (h : a < b) : IsLUB (Ioc a b) b :=
(isGreatest_Ioc h).isLUB
theorem upperBounds_Ioc (h : a < b) : upperBounds (Ioc a b) = Ici b :=
(isLUB_Ioc h).upperBounds_eq
theorem isLeast_Ico (h : a < b) : IsLeast (Ico a b) a :=
⟨left_mem_Ico.2 h, fun _ => And.left⟩
theorem isGLB_Ico (h : a < b) : IsGLB (Ico a b) a :=
(isLeast_Ico h).isGLB
theorem lowerBounds_Ico (h : a < b) : lowerBounds (Ico a b) = Iic a :=
(isGLB_Ico h).lowerBounds_eq
section
variable [SemilatticeSup γ] [DenselyOrdered γ]
theorem isGLB_Ioo {a b : γ} (h : a < b) : IsGLB (Ioo a b) a :=
⟨fun _ hx => hx.1.le, fun x hx => by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (le_sup_right : a ≤ x ⊔ a) with h₁ | h₂
· exact h₁.symm ▸ le_sup_left
obtain ⟨y, lty, ylt⟩ := exists_between h₂
apply (not_lt_of_le (sup_le (hx ⟨lty, ylt.trans_le (sup_le _ h.le)⟩) lty.le) ylt).elim
obtain ⟨u, au, ub⟩ := exists_between h
apply (hx ⟨au, ub⟩).trans ub.le⟩
theorem lowerBounds_Ioo {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : lowerBounds (Ioo a b) = Iic a :=
(isGLB_Ioo hab).lowerBounds_eq
theorem isGLB_Ioc {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : IsGLB (Ioc a b) a :=
(isGLB_Ioo hab).of_subset_of_superset (isGLB_Icc hab.le) Ioo_subset_Ioc_self Ioc_subset_Icc_self
theorem lowerBounds_Ioc {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : lowerBounds (Ioc a b) = Iic a :=
(isGLB_Ioc hab).lowerBounds_eq
end
section
variable [SemilatticeInf γ] [DenselyOrdered γ]
theorem isLUB_Ioo {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : IsLUB (Ioo a b) b := by
simpa only [Ioo_toDual] using isGLB_Ioo hab.dual
theorem upperBounds_Ioo {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : upperBounds (Ioo a b) = Ici b :=
(isLUB_Ioo hab).upperBounds_eq
theorem isLUB_Ico {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : IsLUB (Ico a b) b := by
simpa only [Ioc_toDual] using isGLB_Ioc hab.dual
theorem upperBounds_Ico {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : upperBounds (Ico a b) = Ici b :=
(isLUB_Ico hab).upperBounds_eq
end
theorem bddBelow_iff_subset_Ici : BddBelow s ↔ ∃ a, s ⊆ Ici a :=
Iff.rfl
theorem bddAbove_iff_subset_Iic : BddAbove s ↔ ∃ a, s ⊆ Iic a :=
Iff.rfl
theorem bddBelow_bddAbove_iff_subset_Icc : BddBelow s ∧ BddAbove s ↔ ∃ a b, s ⊆ Icc a b := by
simp [Ici_inter_Iic.symm, subset_inter_iff, bddBelow_iff_subset_Ici,
bddAbove_iff_subset_Iic, exists_and_left, exists_and_right]
/-!
#### Univ
-/
@[simp] theorem isGreatest_univ_iff : IsGreatest univ a ↔ IsTop a := by
simp [IsGreatest, mem_upperBounds, IsTop]
theorem isGreatest_univ [OrderTop α] : IsGreatest (univ : Set α) ⊤ :=
isGreatest_univ_iff.2 isTop_top
@[simp]
theorem OrderTop.upperBounds_univ [PartialOrder γ] [OrderTop γ] :
upperBounds (univ : Set γ) = {⊤} := by rw [isGreatest_univ.upperBounds_eq, Ici_top]
theorem isLUB_univ [OrderTop α] : IsLUB (univ : Set α) ⊤ :=
isGreatest_univ.isLUB
@[simp]
theorem OrderBot.lowerBounds_univ [PartialOrder γ] [OrderBot γ] :
lowerBounds (univ : Set γ) = {⊥} :=
@OrderTop.upperBounds_univ γᵒᵈ _ _
@[simp] theorem isLeast_univ_iff : IsLeast univ a ↔ IsBot a :=
@isGreatest_univ_iff αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem isLeast_univ [OrderBot α] : IsLeast (univ : Set α) ⊥ :=
@isGreatest_univ αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem isGLB_univ [OrderBot α] : IsGLB (univ : Set α) ⊥ :=
isLeast_univ.isGLB
@[simp]
theorem NoTopOrder.upperBounds_univ [NoTopOrder α] : upperBounds (univ : Set α) = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun b hb =>
not_isTop b fun x => hb (mem_univ x)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-18")]
alias NoMaxOrder.upperBounds_univ := NoTopOrder.upperBounds_univ
@[simp]
theorem NoBotOrder.lowerBounds_univ [NoBotOrder α] : lowerBounds (univ : Set α) = ∅ :=
@NoTopOrder.upperBounds_univ αᵒᵈ _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-18")]
alias NoMinOrder.lowerBounds_univ := NoBotOrder.lowerBounds_univ
@[simp]
theorem not_bddAbove_univ [NoTopOrder α] : ¬BddAbove (univ : Set α) := by simp [BddAbove]
@[simp]
theorem not_bddBelow_univ [NoBotOrder α] : ¬BddBelow (univ : Set α) :=
@not_bddAbove_univ αᵒᵈ _ _
/-!
#### Empty set
-/
@[simp]
theorem upperBounds_empty : upperBounds (∅ : Set α) = univ := by
simp only [upperBounds, eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_setOf_eq, forall_mem_empty, forall_true_iff]
@[simp]
theorem lowerBounds_empty : lowerBounds (∅ : Set α) = univ :=
@upperBounds_empty αᵒᵈ _
@[simp]
theorem bddAbove_empty [Nonempty α] : BddAbove (∅ : Set α) := by
simp only [BddAbove, upperBounds_empty, univ_nonempty]
@[simp]
theorem bddBelow_empty [Nonempty α] : BddBelow (∅ : Set α) := by
simp only [BddBelow, lowerBounds_empty, univ_nonempty]
@[simp] theorem isGLB_empty_iff : IsGLB ∅ a ↔ IsTop a := by
simp [IsGLB]
@[simp] theorem isLUB_empty_iff : IsLUB ∅ a ↔ IsBot a :=
@isGLB_empty_iff αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem isGLB_empty [OrderTop α] : IsGLB ∅ (⊤ : α) :=
isGLB_empty_iff.2 isTop_top
theorem isLUB_empty [OrderBot α] : IsLUB ∅ (⊥ : α) :=
@isGLB_empty αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem IsLUB.nonempty [NoBotOrder α] (hs : IsLUB s a) : s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.2 fun h =>
not_isBot a fun _ => hs.right <| by rw [h, upperBounds_empty]; exact mem_univ _
theorem IsGLB.nonempty [NoTopOrder α] (hs : IsGLB s a) : s.Nonempty :=
hs.dual.nonempty
theorem nonempty_of_not_bddAbove [ha : Nonempty α] (h : ¬BddAbove s) : s.Nonempty :=
(Nonempty.elim ha) fun x => (not_bddAbove_iff'.1 h x).imp fun _ ha => ha.1
theorem nonempty_of_not_bddBelow [Nonempty α] (h : ¬BddBelow s) : s.Nonempty :=
@nonempty_of_not_bddAbove αᵒᵈ _ _ _ h
/-!
#### insert
-/
/-- Adding a point to a set preserves its boundedness above. -/
@[simp]
theorem bddAbove_insert [IsDirected α (· ≤ ·)] {s : Set α} {a : α} :
BddAbove (insert a s) ↔ BddAbove s := by
simp only [insert_eq, bddAbove_union, bddAbove_singleton, true_and]
protected theorem BddAbove.insert [IsDirected α (· ≤ ·)] {s : Set α} (a : α) :
BddAbove s → BddAbove (insert a s) :=
bddAbove_insert.2
/-- Adding a point to a set preserves its boundedness below. -/
@[simp]
theorem bddBelow_insert [IsDirected α (· ≥ ·)] {s : Set α} {a : α} :
BddBelow (insert a s) ↔ BddBelow s := by
simp only [insert_eq, bddBelow_union, bddBelow_singleton, true_and]
protected theorem BddBelow.insert [IsDirected α (· ≥ ·)] {s : Set α} (a : α) :
BddBelow s → BddBelow (insert a s) :=
bddBelow_insert.2
protected theorem IsLUB.insert [SemilatticeSup γ] (a) {b} {s : Set γ} (hs : IsLUB s b) :
IsLUB (insert a s) (a ⊔ b) := by
rw [insert_eq]
exact isLUB_singleton.union hs
protected theorem IsGLB.insert [SemilatticeInf γ] (a) {b} {s : Set γ} (hs : IsGLB s b) :
IsGLB (insert a s) (a ⊓ b) := by
rw [insert_eq]
exact isGLB_singleton.union hs
protected theorem IsGreatest.insert [LinearOrder γ] (a) {b} {s : Set γ} (hs : IsGreatest s b) :
IsGreatest (insert a s) (max a b) := by
rw [insert_eq]
exact isGreatest_singleton.union hs
protected theorem IsLeast.insert [LinearOrder γ] (a) {b} {s : Set γ} (hs : IsLeast s b) :
IsLeast (insert a s) (min a b) := by
rw [insert_eq]
exact isLeast_singleton.union hs
@[simp]
theorem upperBounds_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) :
upperBounds (insert a s) = Ici a ∩ upperBounds s := by
rw [insert_eq, upperBounds_union, upperBounds_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem lowerBounds_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) :
lowerBounds (insert a s) = Iic a ∩ lowerBounds s := by
rw [insert_eq, lowerBounds_union, lowerBounds_singleton]
/-- When there is a global maximum, every set is bounded above. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem OrderTop.bddAbove [OrderTop α] (s : Set α) : BddAbove s :=
⟨⊤, fun a _ => OrderTop.le_top a⟩
/-- When there is a global minimum, every set is bounded below. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem OrderBot.bddBelow [OrderBot α] (s : Set α) : BddBelow s :=
⟨⊥, fun a _ => OrderBot.bot_le a⟩
/-- Sets are automatically bounded or cobounded in complete lattices. To use the same statements
in complete and conditionally complete lattices but let automation fill automatically the
boundedness proofs in complete lattices, we use the tactic `bddDefault` in the statements,
in the form `(hA : BddAbove A := by bddDefault)`. -/
macro "bddDefault" : tactic =>
`(tactic| first
| apply OrderTop.bddAbove
| apply OrderBot.bddBelow)
/-!
#### Pair
-/
theorem isLUB_pair [SemilatticeSup γ] {a b : γ} : IsLUB {a, b} (a ⊔ b) :=
isLUB_singleton.insert _
theorem isGLB_pair [SemilatticeInf γ] {a b : γ} : IsGLB {a, b} (a ⊓ b) :=
isGLB_singleton.insert _
theorem isLeast_pair [LinearOrder γ] {a b : γ} : IsLeast {a, b} (min a b) :=
isLeast_singleton.insert _
theorem isGreatest_pair [LinearOrder γ] {a b : γ} : IsGreatest {a, b} (max a b) :=
isGreatest_singleton.insert _
/-!
#### Lower/upper bounds
-/
@[simp]
theorem isLUB_lowerBounds : IsLUB (lowerBounds s) a ↔ IsGLB s a :=
⟨fun H => ⟨fun _ hx => H.2 <| subset_upperBounds_lowerBounds s hx, H.1⟩, IsGreatest.isLUB⟩
@[simp]
theorem isGLB_upperBounds : IsGLB (upperBounds s) a ↔ IsLUB s a :=
@isLUB_lowerBounds αᵒᵈ _ _ _
end
/-!
### (In)equalities with the least upper bound and the greatest lower bound
-/
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] {s : Set α} {a b : α}
theorem lowerBounds_le_upperBounds (ha : a ∈ lowerBounds s) (hb : b ∈ upperBounds s) :
s.Nonempty → a ≤ b
| ⟨_, hc⟩ => le_trans (ha hc) (hb hc)
theorem isGLB_le_isLUB (ha : IsGLB s a) (hb : IsLUB s b) (hs : s.Nonempty) : a ≤ b :=
lowerBounds_le_upperBounds ha.1 hb.1 hs
theorem isLUB_lt_iff (ha : IsLUB s a) : a < b ↔ ∃ c ∈ upperBounds s, c < b :=
⟨fun hb => ⟨a, ha.1, hb⟩, fun ⟨_, hcs, hcb⟩ => lt_of_le_of_lt (ha.2 hcs) hcb⟩
theorem lt_isGLB_iff (ha : IsGLB s a) : b < a ↔ ∃ c ∈ lowerBounds s, b < c :=
isLUB_lt_iff ha.dual
theorem le_of_isLUB_le_isGLB {x y} (ha : IsGLB s a) (hb : IsLUB s b) (hab : b ≤ a) (hx : x ∈ s)
(hy : y ∈ s) : x ≤ y :=
calc
x ≤ b := hb.1 hx
_ ≤ a := hab
_ ≤ y := ha.1 hy
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {s : Set α} {a b : α}
theorem IsLeast.unique (Ha : IsLeast s a) (Hb : IsLeast s b) : a = b :=
le_antisymm (Ha.right Hb.left) (Hb.right Ha.left)
theorem IsLeast.isLeast_iff_eq (Ha : IsLeast s a) : IsLeast s b ↔ a = b :=
Iff.intro Ha.unique fun h => h ▸ Ha
theorem IsGreatest.unique (Ha : IsGreatest s a) (Hb : IsGreatest s b) : a = b :=
le_antisymm (Hb.right Ha.left) (Ha.right Hb.left)
theorem IsGreatest.isGreatest_iff_eq (Ha : IsGreatest s a) : IsGreatest s b ↔ a = b :=
Iff.intro Ha.unique fun h => h ▸ Ha
theorem IsLUB.unique (Ha : IsLUB s a) (Hb : IsLUB s b) : a = b :=
IsLeast.unique Ha Hb
theorem IsGLB.unique (Ha : IsGLB s a) (Hb : IsGLB s b) : a = b :=
IsGreatest.unique Ha Hb
theorem Set.subsingleton_of_isLUB_le_isGLB (Ha : IsGLB s a) (Hb : IsLUB s b) (hab : b ≤ a) :
s.Subsingleton := fun _ hx _ hy =>
le_antisymm (le_of_isLUB_le_isGLB Ha Hb hab hx hy) (le_of_isLUB_le_isGLB Ha Hb hab hy hx)
theorem isGLB_lt_isLUB_of_ne (Ha : IsGLB s a) (Hb : IsLUB s b) {x y} (Hx : x ∈ s) (Hy : y ∈ s)
(Hxy : x ≠ y) : a < b :=
lt_iff_le_not_le.2
⟨lowerBounds_le_upperBounds Ha.1 Hb.1 ⟨x, Hx⟩, fun hab =>
Hxy <| Set.subsingleton_of_isLUB_le_isGLB Ha Hb hab Hx Hy⟩
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] {s : Set α} {a b : α}
theorem lt_isLUB_iff (h : IsLUB s a) : b < a ↔ ∃ c ∈ s, b < c := by
simp_rw [← not_le, isLUB_le_iff h, mem_upperBounds, not_forall, not_le, exists_prop]
theorem isGLB_lt_iff (h : IsGLB s a) : a < b ↔ ∃ c ∈ s, c < b :=
lt_isLUB_iff h.dual
theorem IsLUB.exists_between (h : IsLUB s a) (hb : b < a) : ∃ c ∈ s, b < c ∧ c ≤ a :=
let ⟨c, hcs, hbc⟩ := (lt_isLUB_iff h).1 hb
⟨c, hcs, hbc, h.1 hcs⟩
theorem IsLUB.exists_between' (h : IsLUB s a) (h' : a ∉ s) (hb : b < a) : ∃ c ∈ s, b < c ∧ c < a :=
let ⟨c, hcs, hbc, hca⟩ := h.exists_between hb
⟨c, hcs, hbc, hca.lt_of_ne fun hac => h' <| hac ▸ hcs⟩
theorem IsGLB.exists_between (h : IsGLB s a) (hb : a < b) : ∃ c ∈ s, a ≤ c ∧ c < b :=
let ⟨c, hcs, hbc⟩ := (isGLB_lt_iff h).1 hb
⟨c, hcs, h.1 hcs, hbc⟩
theorem IsGLB.exists_between' (h : IsGLB s a) (h' : a ∉ s) (hb : a < b) : ∃ c ∈ s, a < c ∧ c < b :=
let ⟨c, hcs, hac, hcb⟩ := h.exists_between hb
⟨c, hcs, hac.lt_of_ne fun hac => h' <| hac.symm ▸ hcs, hcb⟩
end LinearOrder
theorem isGreatest_himp [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] (a b : α) :
IsGreatest {w | w ⊓ a ≤ b} (a ⇨ b) := by
simp [IsGreatest, mem_upperBounds]
theorem isLeast_sdiff [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] (a b : α) :
IsLeast {w | a ≤ b ⊔ w} (a \ b) := by
simp [IsLeast, mem_lowerBounds]
theorem isGreatest_compl [HeytingAlgebra α] (a : α) :
IsGreatest {w | Disjoint w a} (aᶜ) := by
simpa only [himp_bot, disjoint_iff_inf_le] using isGreatest_himp a ⊥
theorem isLeast_hnot [CoheytingAlgebra α] (a : α) :
IsLeast {w | Codisjoint a w} (￢a) := by
simpa only [CoheytingAlgebra.top_sdiff, codisjoint_iff_le_sup] using isLeast_sdiff ⊤ a
| Mathlib/Order/Bounds/Basic.lean | 967 | 970 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Asymptotics
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Normed
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Trigonometric
/-!
# Complex and real exponential
In this file we prove continuity of `Complex.exp` and `Real.exp`. We also prove a few facts about
limits of `Real.exp` at infinity.
## Tags
exp
-/
noncomputable section
open Asymptotics Bornology Finset Filter Function Metric Set Topology
open scoped Nat
namespace Complex
variable {z y x : ℝ}
theorem exp_bound_sq (x z : ℂ) (hz : ‖z‖ ≤ 1) :
‖exp (x + z) - exp x - z • exp x‖ ≤ ‖exp x‖ * ‖z‖ ^ 2 :=
calc
‖exp (x + z) - exp x - z * exp x‖ = ‖exp x * (exp z - 1 - z)‖ := by
congr
rw [exp_add]
ring
_ = ‖exp x‖ * ‖exp z - 1 - z‖ := norm_mul _ _
_ ≤ ‖exp x‖ * ‖z‖ ^ 2 :=
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (norm_exp_sub_one_sub_id_le hz) (norm_nonneg _)
theorem locally_lipschitz_exp {r : ℝ} (hr_nonneg : 0 ≤ r) (hr_le : r ≤ 1) (x y : ℂ)
(hyx : ‖y - x‖ < r) : ‖exp y - exp x‖ ≤ (1 + r) * ‖exp x‖ * ‖y - x‖ := by
have hy_eq : y = x + (y - x) := by abel
have hyx_sq_le : ‖y - x‖ ^ 2 ≤ r * ‖y - x‖ := by
rw [pow_two]
exact mul_le_mul hyx.le le_rfl (norm_nonneg _) hr_nonneg
have h_sq : ∀ z, ‖z‖ ≤ 1 → ‖exp (x + z) - exp x‖ ≤ ‖z‖ * ‖exp x‖ + ‖exp x‖ * ‖z‖ ^ 2 := by
intro z hz
have : ‖exp (x + z) - exp x - z • exp x‖ ≤ ‖exp x‖ * ‖z‖ ^ 2 := exp_bound_sq x z hz
rw [← sub_le_iff_le_add', ← norm_smul z]
exact (norm_sub_norm_le _ _).trans this
calc
‖exp y - exp x‖ = ‖exp (x + (y - x)) - exp x‖ := by nth_rw 1 [hy_eq]
_ ≤ ‖y - x‖ * ‖exp x‖ + ‖exp x‖ * ‖y - x‖ ^ 2 := h_sq (y - x) (hyx.le.trans hr_le)
_ ≤ ‖y - x‖ * ‖exp x‖ + ‖exp x‖ * (r * ‖y - x‖) :=
(add_le_add_left (mul_le_mul le_rfl hyx_sq_le (sq_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)) _)
_ = (1 + r) * ‖exp x‖ * ‖y - x‖ := by ring
-- Porting note: proof by term mode `locally_lipschitz_exp zero_le_one le_rfl x`
-- doesn't work because `‖y - x‖` and `dist y x` don't unify
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_exp : Continuous exp :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.mpr fun x =>
continuousAt_of_locally_lipschitz zero_lt_one (2 * ‖exp x‖)
(fun y ↦ by
convert locally_lipschitz_exp zero_le_one le_rfl x y using 2
congr
ring)
theorem continuousOn_exp {s : Set ℂ} : ContinuousOn exp s :=
continuous_exp.continuousOn
lemma exp_sub_sum_range_isBigO_pow (n : ℕ) :
(fun x ↦ exp x - ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, x ^ i / i !) =O[𝓝 0] (· ^ n) := by
rcases (zero_le n).eq_or_lt with rfl | hn
· simpa using continuous_exp.continuousAt.norm.isBoundedUnder_le
· refine .of_bound (n.succ / (n ! * n)) ?_
rw [NormedAddCommGroup.nhds_zero_basis_norm_lt.eventually_iff]
refine ⟨1, one_pos, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
convert exp_bound hx.out.le hn using 1
field_simp [mul_comm]
lemma exp_sub_sum_range_succ_isLittleO_pow (n : ℕ) :
(fun x ↦ exp x - ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), x ^ i / i !) =o[𝓝 0] (· ^ n) :=
(exp_sub_sum_range_isBigO_pow (n + 1)).trans_isLittleO <| isLittleO_pow_pow n.lt_succ_self
end Complex
section ComplexContinuousExpComp
variable {α : Type*}
open Complex
theorem Filter.Tendsto.cexp {l : Filter α} {f : α → ℂ} {z : ℂ} (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 z)) :
Tendsto (fun x => exp (f x)) l (𝓝 (exp z)) :=
(continuous_exp.tendsto _).comp hf
variable [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → ℂ} {s : Set α} {x : α}
nonrec
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.cexp (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun y => exp (f y)) s x :=
h.cexp
@[fun_prop]
nonrec
theorem ContinuousAt.cexp (h : ContinuousAt f x) : ContinuousAt (fun y => exp (f y)) x :=
h.cexp
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousOn.cexp (h : ContinuousOn f s) : ContinuousOn (fun y => exp (f y)) s :=
fun x hx => (h x hx).cexp
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.cexp (h : Continuous f) : Continuous fun y => exp (f y) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => h.continuousAt.cexp
/-- The complex exponential function is uniformly continuous on left half planes. -/
lemma UniformContinuousOn.cexp (a : ℝ) : UniformContinuousOn exp {x : ℂ | x.re ≤ a} := by
have : Continuous (cexp - 1) := Continuous.sub (Continuous.cexp continuous_id') continuous_one
rw [Metric.uniformContinuousOn_iff, Metric.continuous_iff'] at *
intro ε hε
simp only [gt_iff_lt, Pi.sub_apply, Pi.one_apply, dist_sub_eq_dist_add_right,
sub_add_cancel] at this
have ha : 0 < ε / (2 * Real.exp a) := by positivity
have H := this 0 (ε / (2 * Real.exp a)) ha
rw [Metric.eventually_nhds_iff] at H
obtain ⟨δ, hδ⟩ := H
refine ⟨δ, hδ.1, ?_⟩
intros x _ y hy hxy
have h3 := hδ.2 (y := x - y) (by simpa only [dist_zero_right] using hxy)
rw [dist_eq_norm, exp_zero] at *
have : cexp x - cexp y = cexp y * (cexp (x - y) - 1) := by
rw [mul_sub_one, ← exp_add]
ring_nf
rw [this, mul_comm]
have hya : ‖cexp y‖ ≤ Real.exp a := by
simp only [norm_exp, Real.exp_le_exp]
exact hy
simp only [gt_iff_lt, dist_zero_right, Set.mem_setOf_eq, norm_mul, Complex.norm_exp] at *
apply lt_of_le_of_lt (mul_le_mul h3.le hya (Real.exp_nonneg y.re) (le_of_lt ha))
have hrr : ε / (2 * a.exp) * a.exp = ε / 2 := by
nth_rw 2 [mul_comm]
field_simp [mul_assoc]
rw [hrr]
exact div_two_lt_of_pos hε
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-11")] alias UniformlyContinuousOn.cexp := UniformContinuousOn.cexp
end ComplexContinuousExpComp
namespace Real
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_exp : Continuous exp :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal.cexp
theorem continuousOn_exp {s : Set ℝ} : ContinuousOn exp s :=
continuous_exp.continuousOn
lemma exp_sub_sum_range_isBigO_pow (n : ℕ) :
(fun x ↦ exp x - ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, x ^ i / i !) =O[𝓝 0] (· ^ n) := by
have := (Complex.exp_sub_sum_range_isBigO_pow n).comp_tendsto
(Complex.continuous_ofReal.tendsto' 0 0 rfl)
simp only [Function.comp_def] at this
norm_cast at this
lemma exp_sub_sum_range_succ_isLittleO_pow (n : ℕ) :
(fun x ↦ exp x - ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), x ^ i / i !) =o[𝓝 0] (· ^ n) :=
(exp_sub_sum_range_isBigO_pow (n + 1)).trans_isLittleO <| isLittleO_pow_pow n.lt_succ_self
end Real
section RealContinuousExpComp
variable {α : Type*}
open Real
theorem Filter.Tendsto.rexp {l : Filter α} {f : α → ℝ} {z : ℝ} (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 z)) :
Tendsto (fun x => exp (f x)) l (𝓝 (exp z)) :=
(continuous_exp.tendsto _).comp hf
variable [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → ℝ} {s : Set α} {x : α}
nonrec
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.rexp (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun y ↦ exp (f y)) s x :=
h.rexp
@[fun_prop]
nonrec
theorem ContinuousAt.rexp (h : ContinuousAt f x) : ContinuousAt (fun y ↦ exp (f y)) x :=
h.rexp
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousOn.rexp (h : ContinuousOn f s) :
ContinuousOn (fun y ↦ exp (f y)) s :=
fun x hx ↦ (h x hx).rexp
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.rexp (h : Continuous f) : Continuous fun y ↦ exp (f y) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ ↦ h.continuousAt.rexp
end RealContinuousExpComp
namespace Real
variable {α : Type*} {x y z : ℝ} {l : Filter α}
theorem exp_half (x : ℝ) : exp (x / 2) = √(exp x) := by
rw [eq_comm, sqrt_eq_iff_eq_sq, sq, ← exp_add, add_halves] <;> exact (exp_pos _).le
/-- The real exponential function tends to `+∞` at `+∞`. -/
theorem tendsto_exp_atTop : Tendsto exp atTop atTop := by
have A : Tendsto (fun x : ℝ => x + 1) atTop atTop :=
tendsto_atTop_add_const_right atTop 1 tendsto_id
have B : ∀ᶠ x in atTop, x + 1 ≤ exp x := eventually_atTop.2 ⟨0, fun x _ => add_one_le_exp x⟩
exact tendsto_atTop_mono' atTop B A
/-- The real exponential function tends to `0` at `-∞` or, equivalently, `exp(-x)` tends to `0`
at `+∞` -/
theorem tendsto_exp_neg_atTop_nhds_zero : Tendsto (fun x => exp (-x)) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
(tendsto_inv_atTop_zero.comp tendsto_exp_atTop).congr fun x => (exp_neg x).symm
/-- The real exponential function tends to `1` at `0`. -/
theorem tendsto_exp_nhds_zero_nhds_one : Tendsto exp (𝓝 0) (𝓝 1) := by
convert continuous_exp.tendsto 0
simp
theorem tendsto_exp_atBot : Tendsto exp atBot (𝓝 0) :=
(tendsto_exp_neg_atTop_nhds_zero.comp tendsto_neg_atBot_atTop).congr fun x =>
congr_arg exp <| neg_neg x
theorem tendsto_exp_atBot_nhdsGT : Tendsto exp atBot (𝓝[>] 0) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨tendsto_exp_atBot, tendsto_principal.2 <| Eventually.of_forall exp_pos⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias tendsto_exp_atBot_nhdsWithin := tendsto_exp_atBot_nhdsGT
@[simp]
theorem isBoundedUnder_ge_exp_comp (l : Filter α) (f : α → ℝ) :
IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l fun x => exp (f x) :=
isBoundedUnder_of ⟨0, fun _ => (exp_pos _).le⟩
@[simp]
theorem isBoundedUnder_le_exp_comp {f : α → ℝ} :
(IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l fun x => exp (f x)) ↔ IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l f :=
exp_monotone.isBoundedUnder_le_comp_iff tendsto_exp_atTop
/-- The function `exp(x)/x^n` tends to `+∞` at `+∞`, for any natural number `n` -/
theorem tendsto_exp_div_pow_atTop (n : ℕ) : Tendsto (fun x => exp x / x ^ n) atTop atTop := by
refine (atTop_basis_Ioi.tendsto_iff (atTop_basis' 1)).2 fun C hC₁ => ?_
have hC₀ : 0 < C := zero_lt_one.trans_le hC₁
have : 0 < (exp 1 * C)⁻¹ := inv_pos.2 (mul_pos (exp_pos _) hC₀)
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ : ∃ N : ℕ, ∀ k ≥ N, (↑k : ℝ) ^ n / exp 1 ^ k < (exp 1 * C)⁻¹ :=
eventually_atTop.1
((tendsto_pow_const_div_const_pow_of_one_lt n (one_lt_exp_iff.2 zero_lt_one)).eventually
(gt_mem_nhds this))
simp only [← exp_nat_mul, mul_one, div_lt_iff₀, exp_pos, ← div_eq_inv_mul] at hN
refine ⟨N, trivial, fun x hx => ?_⟩
rw [Set.mem_Ioi] at hx
have hx₀ : 0 < x := (Nat.cast_nonneg N).trans_lt hx
rw [Set.mem_Ici, le_div_iff₀ (pow_pos hx₀ _), ← le_div_iff₀' hC₀]
calc
x ^ n ≤ ⌈x⌉₊ ^ n := by gcongr; exact Nat.le_ceil _
_ ≤ exp ⌈x⌉₊ / (exp 1 * C) := mod_cast (hN _ (Nat.lt_ceil.2 hx).le).le
_ ≤ exp (x + 1) / (exp 1 * C) := by gcongr; exact (Nat.ceil_lt_add_one hx₀.le).le
_ = exp x / C := by rw [add_comm, exp_add, mul_div_mul_left _ _ (exp_pos _).ne']
/-- The function `x^n * exp(-x)` tends to `0` at `+∞`, for any natural number `n`. -/
theorem tendsto_pow_mul_exp_neg_atTop_nhds_zero (n : ℕ) :
Tendsto (fun x => x ^ n * exp (-x)) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
(tendsto_inv_atTop_zero.comp (tendsto_exp_div_pow_atTop n)).congr fun x => by
rw [comp_apply, inv_eq_one_div, div_div_eq_mul_div, one_mul, div_eq_mul_inv, exp_neg]
/-- The function `(b * exp x + c) / (x ^ n)` tends to `+∞` at `+∞`, for any natural number
`n` and any real numbers `b` and `c` such that `b` is positive. -/
theorem tendsto_mul_exp_add_div_pow_atTop (b c : ℝ) (n : ℕ) (hb : 0 < b) :
Tendsto (fun x => (b * exp x + c) / x ^ n) atTop atTop := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp only [pow_zero, div_one]
exact (tendsto_exp_atTop.const_mul_atTop hb).atTop_add tendsto_const_nhds
simp only [add_div, mul_div_assoc]
exact
((tendsto_exp_div_pow_atTop n).const_mul_atTop hb).atTop_add
(tendsto_const_nhds.div_atTop (tendsto_pow_atTop hn))
/-- The function `(x ^ n) / (b * exp x + c)` tends to `0` at `+∞`, for any natural number
`n` and any real numbers `b` and `c` such that `b` is nonzero. -/
theorem tendsto_div_pow_mul_exp_add_atTop (b c : ℝ) (n : ℕ) (hb : 0 ≠ b) :
Tendsto (fun x => x ^ n / (b * exp x + c)) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
have H : ∀ d e, 0 < d → Tendsto (fun x : ℝ => x ^ n / (d * exp x + e)) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
intro b' c' h
convert (tendsto_mul_exp_add_div_pow_atTop b' c' n h).inv_tendsto_atTop using 1
ext x
simp
rcases lt_or_gt_of_ne hb with h | h
· exact H b c h
· convert (H (-b) (-c) (neg_pos.mpr h)).neg using 1
· ext x
field_simp
rw [← neg_add (b * exp x) c, neg_div_neg_eq]
· rw [neg_zero]
/-- `Real.exp` as an order isomorphism between `ℝ` and `(0, +∞)`. -/
def expOrderIso : ℝ ≃o Ioi (0 : ℝ) :=
StrictMono.orderIsoOfSurjective _ (exp_strictMono.codRestrict exp_pos) <|
(continuous_exp.subtype_mk _).surjective
(by rw [tendsto_Ioi_atTop]; simp only [tendsto_exp_atTop])
(by rw [tendsto_Ioi_atBot]; simp only [tendsto_exp_atBot_nhdsGT])
@[simp]
theorem coe_expOrderIso_apply (x : ℝ) : (expOrderIso x : ℝ) = exp x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp_expOrderIso : (↑) ∘ expOrderIso = exp :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem range_exp : range exp = Set.Ioi 0 := by
rw [← coe_comp_expOrderIso, range_comp, expOrderIso.range_eq, image_univ, Subtype.range_coe]
@[simp]
theorem map_exp_atTop : map exp atTop = atTop := by
rw [← coe_comp_expOrderIso, ← Filter.map_map, OrderIso.map_atTop, map_val_Ioi_atTop]
@[simp]
theorem comap_exp_atTop : comap exp atTop = atTop := by
rw [← map_exp_atTop, comap_map exp_injective, map_exp_atTop]
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_exp_comp_atTop {f : α → ℝ} :
Tendsto (fun x => exp (f x)) l atTop ↔ Tendsto f l atTop := by
simp_rw [← comp_apply (f := exp), ← tendsto_comap_iff, comap_exp_atTop]
theorem tendsto_comp_exp_atTop {f : ℝ → α} :
Tendsto (fun x => f (exp x)) atTop l ↔ Tendsto f atTop l := by
simp_rw [← comp_apply (g := exp), ← tendsto_map'_iff, map_exp_atTop]
@[simp]
theorem map_exp_atBot : map exp atBot = 𝓝[>] 0 := by
rw [← coe_comp_expOrderIso, ← Filter.map_map, expOrderIso.map_atBot, ← map_coe_Ioi_atBot]
@[simp]
theorem comap_exp_nhdsGT_zero : comap exp (𝓝[>] 0) = atBot := by
rw [← map_exp_atBot, comap_map exp_injective]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias comap_exp_nhdsWithin_Ioi_zero := comap_exp_nhdsGT_zero
theorem tendsto_comp_exp_atBot {f : ℝ → α} :
Tendsto (fun x => f (exp x)) atBot l ↔ Tendsto f (𝓝[>] 0) l := by
rw [← map_exp_atBot, tendsto_map'_iff]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comap_exp_nhds_zero : comap exp (𝓝 0) = atBot :=
(comap_nhdsWithin_range exp 0).symm.trans <| by simp
|
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Exp.lean | 359 | 360 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.ChartedSpace
/-!
# Local properties invariant under a groupoid
We study properties of a triple `(g, s, x)` where `g` is a function between two spaces `H` and `H'`,
`s` is a subset of `H` and `x` is a point of `H`. Our goal is to register how such a property
should behave to make sense in charted spaces modelled on `H` and `H'`.
The main examples we have in mind are the properties "`g` is differentiable at `x` within `s`", or
"`g` is smooth at `x` within `s`". We want to develop general results that, when applied in these
specific situations, say that the notion of smooth function in a manifold behaves well under
restriction, intersection, is local, and so on.
## Main definitions
* `LocalInvariantProp G G' P` says that a property `P` of a triple `(g, s, x)` is local, and
invariant under composition by elements of the groupoids `G` and `G'` of `H` and `H'`
respectively.
* `ChartedSpace.LiftPropWithinAt` (resp. `LiftPropAt`, `LiftPropOn` and `LiftProp`):
given a property `P` of `(g, s, x)` where `g : H → H'`, define the corresponding property
for functions `M → M'` where `M` and `M'` are charted spaces modelled respectively on `H` and
`H'`. We define these properties within a set at a point, or at a point, or on a set, or in the
whole space. This lifting process (obtained by restricting to suitable chart domains) can always
be done, but it only behaves well under locality and invariance assumptions.
Given `hG : LocalInvariantProp G G' P`, we deduce many properties of the lifted property on the
charted spaces. For instance, `hG.liftPropWithinAt_inter` says that `P g s x` is equivalent to
`P g (s ∩ t) x` whenever `t` is a neighborhood of `x`.
## Implementation notes
We do not use dot notation for properties of the lifted property. For instance, we have
`hG.liftPropWithinAt_congr` saying that if `LiftPropWithinAt P g s x` holds, and `g` and `g'`
coincide on `s`, then `LiftPropWithinAt P g' s x` holds. We can't call it
`LiftPropWithinAt.congr` as it is in the namespace associated to `LocalInvariantProp`, not
in the one for `LiftPropWithinAt`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace
open scoped Manifold Topology
variable {H M H' M' X : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace H] [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
variable [TopologicalSpace H'] [TopologicalSpace M'] [ChartedSpace H' M']
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
namespace StructureGroupoid
variable (G : StructureGroupoid H) (G' : StructureGroupoid H')
/-- Structure recording good behavior of a property of a triple `(f, s, x)` where `f` is a function,
`s` a set and `x` a point. Good behavior here means locality and invariance under given groupoids
(both in the source and in the target). Given such a good behavior, the lift of this property
to charted spaces admitting these groupoids will inherit the good behavior. -/
structure LocalInvariantProp (P : (H → H') → Set H → H → Prop) : Prop where
is_local : ∀ {s x u} {f : H → H'}, IsOpen u → x ∈ u → (P f s x ↔ P f (s ∩ u) x)
right_invariance' : ∀ {s x f} {e : PartialHomeomorph H H},
e ∈ G → x ∈ e.source → P f s x → P (f ∘ e.symm) (e.symm ⁻¹' s) (e x)
congr_of_forall : ∀ {s x} {f g : H → H'}, (∀ y ∈ s, f y = g y) → f x = g x → P f s x → P g s x
left_invariance' : ∀ {s x f} {e' : PartialHomeomorph H' H'},
e' ∈ G' → s ⊆ f ⁻¹' e'.source → f x ∈ e'.source → P f s x → P (e' ∘ f) s x
variable {G G'} {P : (H → H') → Set H → H → Prop}
variable (hG : G.LocalInvariantProp G' P)
include hG
namespace LocalInvariantProp
theorem congr_set {s t : Set H} {x : H} {f : H → H'} (hu : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) : P f s x ↔ P f t x := by
obtain ⟨o, host, ho, hxo⟩ := mem_nhds_iff.mp hu.mem_iff
simp_rw [subset_def, mem_setOf, ← and_congr_left_iff, ← mem_inter_iff, ← Set.ext_iff] at host
rw [hG.is_local ho hxo, host, ← hG.is_local ho hxo]
theorem is_local_nhds {s u : Set H} {x : H} {f : H → H'} (hu : u ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
P f s x ↔ P f (s ∩ u) x :=
hG.congr_set <| mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventuallyEq.mp hu
theorem congr_iff_nhdsWithin {s : Set H} {x : H} {f g : H → H'} (h1 : f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] g)
(h2 : f x = g x) : P f s x ↔ P g s x := by
simp_rw [hG.is_local_nhds h1]
exact ⟨hG.congr_of_forall (fun y hy ↦ hy.2) h2, hG.congr_of_forall (fun y hy ↦ hy.2.symm) h2.symm⟩
theorem congr_nhdsWithin {s : Set H} {x : H} {f g : H → H'} (h1 : f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] g) (h2 : f x = g x)
(hP : P f s x) : P g s x :=
(hG.congr_iff_nhdsWithin h1 h2).mp hP
theorem congr_nhdsWithin' {s : Set H} {x : H} {f g : H → H'} (h1 : f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] g) (h2 : f x = g x)
(hP : P g s x) : P f s x :=
(hG.congr_iff_nhdsWithin h1 h2).mpr hP
theorem congr_iff {s : Set H} {x : H} {f g : H → H'} (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] g) : P f s x ↔ P g s x :=
hG.congr_iff_nhdsWithin (mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds h) (mem_of_mem_nhds h :)
theorem congr {s : Set H} {x : H} {f g : H → H'} (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] g) (hP : P f s x) : P g s x :=
(hG.congr_iff h).mp hP
theorem congr' {s : Set H} {x : H} {f g : H → H'} (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] g) (hP : P g s x) : P f s x :=
hG.congr h.symm hP
theorem left_invariance {s : Set H} {x : H} {f : H → H'} {e' : PartialHomeomorph H' H'}
(he' : e' ∈ G') (hfs : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (hxe' : f x ∈ e'.source) :
P (e' ∘ f) s x ↔ P f s x := by
have h2f := hfs.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin (e'.open_source.mem_nhds hxe')
have h3f :=
((e'.continuousAt hxe').comp_continuousWithinAt hfs).preimage_mem_nhdsWithin <|
e'.symm.open_source.mem_nhds <| e'.mapsTo hxe'
constructor
· intro h
rw [hG.is_local_nhds h3f] at h
have h2 := hG.left_invariance' (G'.symm he') inter_subset_right (e'.mapsTo hxe') h
rw [← hG.is_local_nhds h3f] at h2
refine hG.congr_nhdsWithin ?_ (e'.left_inv hxe') h2
exact eventually_of_mem h2f fun x' ↦ e'.left_inv
· simp_rw [hG.is_local_nhds h2f]
exact hG.left_invariance' he' inter_subset_right hxe'
theorem right_invariance {s : Set H} {x : H} {f : H → H'} {e : PartialHomeomorph H H} (he : e ∈ G)
(hxe : x ∈ e.source) : P (f ∘ e.symm) (e.symm ⁻¹' s) (e x) ↔ P f s x := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, hG.right_invariance' he hxe⟩
have := hG.right_invariance' (G.symm he) (e.mapsTo hxe) h
rw [e.symm_symm, e.left_inv hxe] at this
refine hG.congr ?_ ((hG.congr_set ?_).mp this)
· refine eventually_of_mem (e.open_source.mem_nhds hxe) fun x' hx' ↦ ?_
simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, e.left_inv hx']
· rw [eventuallyEq_set]
refine eventually_of_mem (e.open_source.mem_nhds hxe) fun x' hx' ↦ ?_
simp_rw [mem_preimage, e.left_inv hx']
end LocalInvariantProp
end StructureGroupoid
namespace ChartedSpace
/-- Given a property of germs of functions and sets in the model space, then one defines
a corresponding property in a charted space, by requiring that it holds at the preferred chart at
this point. (When the property is local and invariant, it will in fact hold using any chart, see
`liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart`). We require continuity in the lifted property, as otherwise one
single chart might fail to capture the behavior of the function.
-/
@[mk_iff liftPropWithinAt_iff']
structure LiftPropWithinAt (P : (H → H') → Set H → H → Prop) (f : M → M') (s : Set M) (x : M) :
Prop where
continuousWithinAt : ContinuousWithinAt f s x
prop : P (chartAt H' (f x) ∘ f ∘ (chartAt H x).symm) ((chartAt H x).symm ⁻¹' s) (chartAt H x x)
/-- Given a property of germs of functions and sets in the model space, then one defines
a corresponding property of functions on sets in a charted space, by requiring that it holds
around each point of the set, in the preferred charts. -/
def LiftPropOn (P : (H → H') → Set H → H → Prop) (f : M → M') (s : Set M) :=
∀ x ∈ s, LiftPropWithinAt P f s x
/-- Given a property of germs of functions and sets in the model space, then one defines
a corresponding property of a function at a point in a charted space, by requiring that it holds
in the preferred chart. -/
def LiftPropAt (P : (H → H') → Set H → H → Prop) (f : M → M') (x : M) :=
LiftPropWithinAt P f univ x
theorem liftPropAt_iff {P : (H → H') → Set H → H → Prop} {f : M → M'} {x : M} :
LiftPropAt P f x ↔
ContinuousAt f x ∧ P (chartAt H' (f x) ∘ f ∘ (chartAt H x).symm) univ (chartAt H x x) := by
rw [LiftPropAt, liftPropWithinAt_iff', continuousWithinAt_univ, preimage_univ]
/-- Given a property of germs of functions and sets in the model space, then one defines
a corresponding property of a function in a charted space, by requiring that it holds
in the preferred chart around every point. -/
def LiftProp (P : (H → H') → Set H → H → Prop) (f : M → M') :=
∀ x, LiftPropAt P f x
theorem liftProp_iff {P : (H → H') → Set H → H → Prop} {f : M → M'} :
LiftProp P f ↔
Continuous f ∧ ∀ x, P (chartAt H' (f x) ∘ f ∘ (chartAt H x).symm) univ (chartAt H x x) := by
simp_rw [LiftProp, liftPropAt_iff, forall_and, continuous_iff_continuousAt]
end ChartedSpace
open ChartedSpace
namespace StructureGroupoid
variable {G : StructureGroupoid H} {G' : StructureGroupoid H'} {e e' : PartialHomeomorph M H}
{f f' : PartialHomeomorph M' H'} {P : (H → H') → Set H → H → Prop} {g g' : M → M'} {s t : Set M}
{x : M} {Q : (H → H) → Set H → H → Prop}
theorem liftPropWithinAt_univ : LiftPropWithinAt P g univ x ↔ LiftPropAt P g x := Iff.rfl
theorem liftPropOn_univ : LiftPropOn P g univ ↔ LiftProp P g := by
simp [LiftPropOn, LiftProp, LiftPropAt]
theorem liftPropWithinAt_self {f : H → H'} {s : Set H} {x : H} :
LiftPropWithinAt P f s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧ P f s x :=
liftPropWithinAt_iff' ..
theorem liftPropWithinAt_self_source {f : H → M'} {s : Set H} {x : H} :
LiftPropWithinAt P f s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧ P (chartAt H' (f x) ∘ f) s x :=
liftPropWithinAt_iff' ..
theorem liftPropWithinAt_self_target {f : M → H'} :
LiftPropWithinAt P f s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
P (f ∘ (chartAt H x).symm) ((chartAt H x).symm ⁻¹' s) (chartAt H x x) :=
liftPropWithinAt_iff' ..
namespace LocalInvariantProp
section
variable (hG : G.LocalInvariantProp G' P)
include hG
/-- `LiftPropWithinAt P f s x` is equivalent to a definition where we restrict the set we are
considering to the domain of the charts at `x` and `f x`. -/
theorem liftPropWithinAt_iff {f : M → M'} :
LiftPropWithinAt P f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
P (chartAt H' (f x) ∘ f ∘ (chartAt H x).symm)
((chartAt H x).target ∩ (chartAt H x).symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' (chartAt H' (f x)).source))
(chartAt H x x) := by
rw [liftPropWithinAt_iff']
refine and_congr_right fun hf ↦ hG.congr_set ?_
exact PartialHomeomorph.preimage_eventuallyEq_target_inter_preimage_inter hf
(mem_chart_source H x) (chart_source_mem_nhds H' (f x))
theorem liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart_source_aux (g : M → H') (he : e ∈ G.maximalAtlas M)
(xe : x ∈ e.source) (he' : e' ∈ G.maximalAtlas M) (xe' : x ∈ e'.source) :
P (g ∘ e.symm) (e.symm ⁻¹' s) (e x) ↔ P (g ∘ e'.symm) (e'.symm ⁻¹' s) (e' x) := by
rw [← hG.right_invariance (compatible_of_mem_maximalAtlas he he')]
swap; · simp only [xe, xe', mfld_simps]
simp_rw [PartialHomeomorph.trans_apply, e.left_inv xe]
rw [hG.congr_iff]
· refine hG.congr_set ?_
refine (eventually_of_mem ?_ fun y (hy : y ∈ e'.symm ⁻¹' e.source) ↦ ?_).set_eq
· refine (e'.symm.continuousAt <| e'.mapsTo xe').preimage_mem_nhds (e.open_source.mem_nhds ?_)
simp_rw [e'.left_inv xe', xe]
simp_rw [mem_preimage, PartialHomeomorph.coe_trans_symm, PartialHomeomorph.symm_symm,
Function.comp_apply, e.left_inv hy]
· refine ((e'.eventually_nhds' _ xe').mpr <| e.eventually_left_inverse xe).mono fun y hy ↦ ?_
simp only [mfld_simps]
rw [hy]
theorem liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart_target_aux2 (g : H → M') {x : H} {s : Set H}
(hf : f ∈ G'.maximalAtlas M') (xf : g x ∈ f.source) (hf' : f' ∈ G'.maximalAtlas M')
(xf' : g x ∈ f'.source) (hgs : ContinuousWithinAt g s x) : P (f ∘ g) s x ↔ P (f' ∘ g) s x := by
have hcont : ContinuousWithinAt (f ∘ g) s x := (f.continuousAt xf).comp_continuousWithinAt hgs
rw [← hG.left_invariance (compatible_of_mem_maximalAtlas hf hf') hcont
(by simp only [xf, xf', mfld_simps])]
refine hG.congr_iff_nhdsWithin ?_ (by simp only [xf, mfld_simps])
exact (hgs.eventually <| f.eventually_left_inverse xf).mono fun y ↦ congr_arg f'
theorem liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart_target_aux {g : X → M'} {e : PartialHomeomorph X H} {x : X}
{s : Set X} (xe : x ∈ e.source) (hf : f ∈ G'.maximalAtlas M') (xf : g x ∈ f.source)
(hf' : f' ∈ G'.maximalAtlas M') (xf' : g x ∈ f'.source) (hgs : ContinuousWithinAt g s x) :
P (f ∘ g ∘ e.symm) (e.symm ⁻¹' s) (e x) ↔ P (f' ∘ g ∘ e.symm) (e.symm ⁻¹' s) (e x) := by
rw [← e.left_inv xe] at xf xf' hgs
refine hG.liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart_target_aux2 (g ∘ e.symm) hf xf hf' xf' ?_
exact hgs.comp (e.symm.continuousAt <| e.mapsTo xe).continuousWithinAt Subset.rfl
/-- If a property of a germ of function `g` on a pointed set `(s, x)` is invariant under the
structure groupoid (by composition in the source space and in the target space), then
expressing it in charted spaces does not depend on the element of the maximal atlas one uses
both in the source and in the target manifolds, provided they are defined around `x` and `g x`
respectively, and provided `g` is continuous within `s` at `x` (otherwise, the local behavior
of `g` at `x` can not be captured with a chart in the target). -/
theorem liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart_aux (he : e ∈ G.maximalAtlas M) (xe : x ∈ e.source)
(he' : e' ∈ G.maximalAtlas M) (xe' : x ∈ e'.source) (hf : f ∈ G'.maximalAtlas M')
(xf : g x ∈ f.source) (hf' : f' ∈ G'.maximalAtlas M') (xf' : g x ∈ f'.source)
(hgs : ContinuousWithinAt g s x) :
P (f ∘ g ∘ e.symm) (e.symm ⁻¹' s) (e x) ↔ P (f' ∘ g ∘ e'.symm) (e'.symm ⁻¹' s) (e' x) := by
rw [← Function.comp_assoc, hG.liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart_source_aux (f ∘ g) he xe he' xe',
Function.comp_assoc, hG.liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart_target_aux xe' hf xf hf' xf' hgs]
theorem liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart [HasGroupoid M G] [HasGroupoid M' G']
(he : e ∈ G.maximalAtlas M) (xe : x ∈ e.source) (hf : f ∈ G'.maximalAtlas M')
(xf : g x ∈ f.source) :
LiftPropWithinAt P g s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt g s x ∧ P (f ∘ g ∘ e.symm) (e.symm ⁻¹' s) (e x) := by
simp only [liftPropWithinAt_iff']
exact and_congr_right <|
hG.liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart_aux (chart_mem_maximalAtlas _ _) (mem_chart_source _ _) he xe
(chart_mem_maximalAtlas _ _) (mem_chart_source _ _) hf xf
/-- A version of `liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart`, only for the source. -/
theorem liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart_source [HasGroupoid M G] (he : e ∈ G.maximalAtlas M)
(xe : x ∈ e.source) :
LiftPropWithinAt P g s x ↔ LiftPropWithinAt P (g ∘ e.symm) (e.symm ⁻¹' s) (e x) := by
rw [liftPropWithinAt_self_source, liftPropWithinAt_iff',
e.symm.continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt_comp_right xe, e.symm_symm]
refine and_congr Iff.rfl ?_
rw [Function.comp_apply, e.left_inv xe, ← Function.comp_assoc,
hG.liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart_source_aux (chartAt _ (g x) ∘ g) (chart_mem_maximalAtlas G x)
(mem_chart_source _ x) he xe, Function.comp_assoc]
/-- A version of `liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart`, only for the target. -/
theorem liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart_target [HasGroupoid M' G'] (hf : f ∈ G'.maximalAtlas M')
(xf : g x ∈ f.source) :
LiftPropWithinAt P g s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt g s x ∧ LiftPropWithinAt P (f ∘ g) s x := by
rw [liftPropWithinAt_self_target, liftPropWithinAt_iff', and_congr_right_iff]
intro hg
simp_rw [(f.continuousAt xf).comp_continuousWithinAt hg, true_and]
exact hG.liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart_target_aux (mem_chart_source _ _)
(chart_mem_maximalAtlas _ _) (mem_chart_source _ _) hf xf hg
/-- A version of `liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart`, that uses `LiftPropWithinAt` on both sides. -/
theorem liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart' [HasGroupoid M G] [HasGroupoid M' G']
(he : e ∈ G.maximalAtlas M) (xe : x ∈ e.source) (hf : f ∈ G'.maximalAtlas M')
(xf : g x ∈ f.source) :
LiftPropWithinAt P g s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt g s x ∧ LiftPropWithinAt P (f ∘ g ∘ e.symm) (e.symm ⁻¹' s) (e x) := by
rw [hG.liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart he xe hf xf, liftPropWithinAt_self, and_left_comm,
Iff.comm, and_iff_right_iff_imp]
intro h
have h1 := (e.symm.continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt_comp_right xe).mp h.1
have : ContinuousAt f ((g ∘ e.symm) (e x)) := by
simp_rw [Function.comp, e.left_inv xe, f.continuousAt xf]
exact this.comp_continuousWithinAt h1
theorem liftPropOn_indep_chart [HasGroupoid M G] [HasGroupoid M' G'] (he : e ∈ G.maximalAtlas M)
(hf : f ∈ G'.maximalAtlas M') (h : LiftPropOn P g s) {y : H}
(hy : y ∈ e.target ∩ e.symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ g ⁻¹' f.source)) :
P (f ∘ g ∘ e.symm) (e.symm ⁻¹' s) y := by
convert ((hG.liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart he (e.symm_mapsTo hy.1) hf hy.2.2).1 (h _ hy.2.1)).2
rw [e.right_inv hy.1]
theorem liftPropWithinAt_inter' (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
LiftPropWithinAt P g (s ∩ t) x ↔ LiftPropWithinAt P g s x := by
rw [liftPropWithinAt_iff', liftPropWithinAt_iff', continuousWithinAt_inter' ht, hG.congr_set]
simp_rw [eventuallyEq_set, mem_preimage,
(chartAt _ x).eventually_nhds' (fun x ↦ x ∈ s ∩ t ↔ x ∈ s) (mem_chart_source _ x)]
exact (mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventuallyEq.mp ht).symm.mem_iff
theorem liftPropWithinAt_inter (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
LiftPropWithinAt P g (s ∩ t) x ↔ LiftPropWithinAt P g s x :=
hG.liftPropWithinAt_inter' (mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds ht)
theorem liftPropWithinAt_congr_set (hu : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
LiftPropWithinAt P g s x ↔ LiftPropWithinAt P g t x := by
rw [← hG.liftPropWithinAt_inter (s := s) hu, ← hG.liftPropWithinAt_inter (s := t) hu,
← eq_iff_iff]
congr 1
aesop
theorem liftPropAt_of_liftPropWithinAt (h : LiftPropWithinAt P g s x) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
LiftPropAt P g x := by
rwa [← univ_inter s, hG.liftPropWithinAt_inter hs] at h
theorem liftPropWithinAt_of_liftPropAt_of_mem_nhds (h : LiftPropAt P g x) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
LiftPropWithinAt P g s x := by
rwa [← univ_inter s, hG.liftPropWithinAt_inter hs]
theorem liftPropOn_of_locally_liftPropOn
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ x ∈ u ∧ LiftPropOn P g (s ∩ u)) : LiftPropOn P g s := by
intro x hx
rcases h x hx with ⟨u, u_open, xu, hu⟩
have := hu x ⟨hx, xu⟩
rwa [hG.liftPropWithinAt_inter] at this
exact u_open.mem_nhds xu
theorem liftProp_of_locally_liftPropOn (h : ∀ x, ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ x ∈ u ∧ LiftPropOn P g u) :
LiftProp P g := by
rw [← liftPropOn_univ]
refine hG.liftPropOn_of_locally_liftPropOn fun x _ ↦ ?_
simp [h x]
theorem liftPropWithinAt_congr_of_eventuallyEq (h : LiftPropWithinAt P g s x) (h₁ : g' =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] g)
(hx : g' x = g x) : LiftPropWithinAt P g' s x := by
refine ⟨h.1.congr_of_eventuallyEq h₁ hx, ?_⟩
refine hG.congr_nhdsWithin' ?_
(by simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, (chartAt H x).left_inv (mem_chart_source H x), hx]) h.2
simp_rw [EventuallyEq, Function.comp_apply]
rw [(chartAt H x).eventually_nhdsWithin'
(fun y ↦ chartAt H' (g' x) (g' y) = chartAt H' (g x) (g y)) (mem_chart_source H x)]
exact h₁.mono fun y hy ↦ by rw [hx, hy]
theorem liftPropWithinAt_congr_of_eventuallyEq_of_mem (h : LiftPropWithinAt P g s x)
(h₁ : g' =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] g) (h₂ : x ∈ s) : LiftPropWithinAt P g' s x :=
liftPropWithinAt_congr_of_eventuallyEq hG h h₁ (mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin h₂ h₁ :)
theorem liftPropWithinAt_congr_iff_of_eventuallyEq (h₁ : g' =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] g) (hx : g' x = g x) :
LiftPropWithinAt P g' s x ↔ LiftPropWithinAt P g s x :=
⟨fun h ↦ hG.liftPropWithinAt_congr_of_eventuallyEq h h₁.symm hx.symm,
fun h ↦ hG.liftPropWithinAt_congr_of_eventuallyEq h h₁ hx⟩
theorem liftPropWithinAt_congr_iff (h₁ : ∀ y ∈ s, g' y = g y) (hx : g' x = g x) :
LiftPropWithinAt P g' s x ↔ LiftPropWithinAt P g s x :=
hG.liftPropWithinAt_congr_iff_of_eventuallyEq (eventually_nhdsWithin_of_forall h₁) hx
theorem liftPropWithinAt_congr_iff_of_mem (h₁ : ∀ y ∈ s, g' y = g y) (hx : x ∈ s) :
LiftPropWithinAt P g' s x ↔ LiftPropWithinAt P g s x :=
hG.liftPropWithinAt_congr_iff_of_eventuallyEq (eventually_nhdsWithin_of_forall h₁) (h₁ _ hx)
theorem liftPropWithinAt_congr (h : LiftPropWithinAt P g s x) (h₁ : ∀ y ∈ s, g' y = g y)
(hx : g' x = g x) : LiftPropWithinAt P g' s x :=
(hG.liftPropWithinAt_congr_iff h₁ hx).mpr h
theorem liftPropWithinAt_congr_of_mem (h : LiftPropWithinAt P g s x) (h₁ : ∀ y ∈ s, g' y = g y)
(hx : x ∈ s) : LiftPropWithinAt P g' s x :=
(hG.liftPropWithinAt_congr_iff h₁ (h₁ _ hx)).mpr h
theorem liftPropAt_congr_iff_of_eventuallyEq (h₁ : g' =ᶠ[𝓝 x] g) :
LiftPropAt P g' x ↔ LiftPropAt P g x :=
hG.liftPropWithinAt_congr_iff_of_eventuallyEq (by simp_rw [nhdsWithin_univ, h₁]) h₁.eq_of_nhds
theorem liftPropAt_congr_of_eventuallyEq (h : LiftPropAt P g x) (h₁ : g' =ᶠ[𝓝 x] g) :
LiftPropAt P g' x :=
(hG.liftPropAt_congr_iff_of_eventuallyEq h₁).mpr h
theorem liftPropOn_congr (h : LiftPropOn P g s) (h₁ : ∀ y ∈ s, g' y = g y) : LiftPropOn P g' s :=
fun x hx ↦ hG.liftPropWithinAt_congr (h x hx) h₁ (h₁ x hx)
theorem liftPropOn_congr_iff (h₁ : ∀ y ∈ s, g' y = g y) : LiftPropOn P g' s ↔ LiftPropOn P g s :=
⟨fun h ↦ hG.liftPropOn_congr h fun y hy ↦ (h₁ y hy).symm, fun h ↦ hG.liftPropOn_congr h h₁⟩
end
theorem liftPropWithinAt_mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
(mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin : ∀ ⦃s x t⦄ ⦃f : H → H'⦄, s ∈ 𝓝[t] x → P f s x → P f t x)
(h : LiftPropWithinAt P g s x) (hst : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x) : LiftPropWithinAt P g t x := by
simp only [liftPropWithinAt_iff'] at h ⊢
refine ⟨h.1.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin hst, mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin ?_ h.2⟩
simp_rw [← mem_map, (chartAt H x).symm.map_nhdsWithin_preimage_eq (mem_chart_target H x),
(chartAt H x).left_inv (mem_chart_source H x), hst]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")]
alias liftPropWithinAt_mono_of_mem := liftPropWithinAt_mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem liftPropWithinAt_mono (mono : ∀ ⦃s x t⦄ ⦃f : H → H'⦄, t ⊆ s → P f s x → P f t x)
(h : LiftPropWithinAt P g s x) (hts : t ⊆ s) : LiftPropWithinAt P g t x := by
refine ⟨h.1.mono hts, mono (fun y hy ↦ ?_) h.2⟩
simp only [mfld_simps] at hy
simp only [hy, hts _, mfld_simps]
theorem liftPropWithinAt_of_liftPropAt (mono : ∀ ⦃s x t⦄ ⦃f : H → H'⦄, t ⊆ s → P f s x → P f t x)
(h : LiftPropAt P g x) : LiftPropWithinAt P g s x := by
rw [← liftPropWithinAt_univ] at h
exact liftPropWithinAt_mono mono h (subset_univ _)
theorem liftPropOn_mono (mono : ∀ ⦃s x t⦄ ⦃f : H → H'⦄, t ⊆ s → P f s x → P f t x)
(h : LiftPropOn P g t) (hst : s ⊆ t) : LiftPropOn P g s :=
fun x hx ↦ liftPropWithinAt_mono mono (h x (hst hx)) hst
theorem liftPropOn_of_liftProp (mono : ∀ ⦃s x t⦄ ⦃f : H → H'⦄, t ⊆ s → P f s x → P f t x)
(h : LiftProp P g) : LiftPropOn P g s := by
rw [← liftPropOn_univ] at h
exact liftPropOn_mono mono h (subset_univ _)
theorem liftPropAt_of_mem_maximalAtlas [HasGroupoid M G] (hG : G.LocalInvariantProp G Q)
(hQ : ∀ y, Q id univ y) (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas M G) (hx : x ∈ e.source) : LiftPropAt Q e x := by
simp_rw [LiftPropAt, hG.liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart he hx G.id_mem_maximalAtlas (mem_univ _),
(e.continuousAt hx).continuousWithinAt, true_and]
exact hG.congr' (e.eventually_right_inverse' hx) (hQ _)
theorem liftPropOn_of_mem_maximalAtlas [HasGroupoid M G] (hG : G.LocalInvariantProp G Q)
(hQ : ∀ y, Q id univ y) (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas M G) : LiftPropOn Q e e.source := by
intro x hx
apply hG.liftPropWithinAt_of_liftPropAt_of_mem_nhds (hG.liftPropAt_of_mem_maximalAtlas hQ he hx)
exact e.open_source.mem_nhds hx
theorem liftPropAt_symm_of_mem_maximalAtlas [HasGroupoid M G] {x : H}
(hG : G.LocalInvariantProp G Q) (hQ : ∀ y, Q id univ y) (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas M G)
(hx : x ∈ e.target) : LiftPropAt Q e.symm x := by
suffices h : Q (e ∘ e.symm) univ x by
have : e.symm x ∈ e.source := by simp only [hx, mfld_simps]
rw [LiftPropAt, hG.liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart G.id_mem_maximalAtlas (mem_univ _) he this]
refine ⟨(e.symm.continuousAt hx).continuousWithinAt, ?_⟩
simp only [h, mfld_simps]
exact hG.congr' (e.eventually_right_inverse hx) (hQ x)
theorem liftPropOn_symm_of_mem_maximalAtlas [HasGroupoid M G] (hG : G.LocalInvariantProp G Q)
(hQ : ∀ y, Q id univ y) (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas M G) : LiftPropOn Q e.symm e.target := by
intro x hx
apply hG.liftPropWithinAt_of_liftPropAt_of_mem_nhds
(hG.liftPropAt_symm_of_mem_maximalAtlas hQ he hx)
exact e.open_target.mem_nhds hx
theorem liftPropAt_chart [HasGroupoid M G] (hG : G.LocalInvariantProp G Q) (hQ : ∀ y, Q id univ y) :
LiftPropAt Q (chartAt (H := H) x) x :=
hG.liftPropAt_of_mem_maximalAtlas hQ (chart_mem_maximalAtlas G x) (mem_chart_source H x)
theorem liftPropOn_chart [HasGroupoid M G] (hG : G.LocalInvariantProp G Q) (hQ : ∀ y, Q id univ y) :
LiftPropOn Q (chartAt (H := H) x) (chartAt (H := H) x).source :=
hG.liftPropOn_of_mem_maximalAtlas hQ (chart_mem_maximalAtlas G x)
theorem liftPropAt_chart_symm [HasGroupoid M G] (hG : G.LocalInvariantProp G Q)
(hQ : ∀ y, Q id univ y) : LiftPropAt Q (chartAt (H := H) x).symm ((chartAt H x) x) :=
hG.liftPropAt_symm_of_mem_maximalAtlas hQ (chart_mem_maximalAtlas G x) (by simp)
theorem liftPropOn_chart_symm [HasGroupoid M G] (hG : G.LocalInvariantProp G Q)
(hQ : ∀ y, Q id univ y) : LiftPropOn Q (chartAt (H := H) x).symm (chartAt H x).target :=
hG.liftPropOn_symm_of_mem_maximalAtlas hQ (chart_mem_maximalAtlas G x)
theorem liftPropAt_of_mem_groupoid (hG : G.LocalInvariantProp G Q) (hQ : ∀ y, Q id univ y)
{f : PartialHomeomorph H H} (hf : f ∈ G) {x : H} (hx : x ∈ f.source) : LiftPropAt Q f x :=
liftPropAt_of_mem_maximalAtlas hG hQ (G.mem_maximalAtlas_of_mem_groupoid hf) hx
theorem liftPropOn_of_mem_groupoid (hG : G.LocalInvariantProp G Q) (hQ : ∀ y, Q id univ y)
{f : PartialHomeomorph H H} (hf : f ∈ G) : LiftPropOn Q f f.source :=
liftPropOn_of_mem_maximalAtlas hG hQ (G.mem_maximalAtlas_of_mem_groupoid hf)
theorem liftProp_id (hG : G.LocalInvariantProp G Q) (hQ : ∀ y, Q id univ y) :
LiftProp Q (id : M → M) := by
simp_rw [liftProp_iff, continuous_id, true_and]
exact fun x ↦ hG.congr' ((chartAt H x).eventually_right_inverse <| mem_chart_target H x) (hQ _)
theorem liftPropAt_iff_comp_subtype_val (hG : LocalInvariantProp G G' P) {U : Opens M}
(f : M → M') (x : U) :
LiftPropAt P f x ↔ LiftPropAt P (f ∘ Subtype.val) x := by
simp only [LiftPropAt, liftPropWithinAt_iff']
congrm ?_ ∧ ?_
· simp_rw [continuousWithinAt_univ, U.isOpenEmbedding'.continuousAt_iff]
· apply hG.congr_iff
exact (U.chartAt_subtype_val_symm_eventuallyEq).fun_comp (chartAt H' (f x) ∘ f)
theorem liftPropAt_iff_comp_inclusion (hG : LocalInvariantProp G G' P) {U V : Opens M} (hUV : U ≤ V)
(f : V → M') (x : U) :
LiftPropAt P f (Set.inclusion hUV x) ↔ LiftPropAt P (f ∘ Set.inclusion hUV : U → M') x := by
simp only [LiftPropAt, liftPropWithinAt_iff']
congrm ?_ ∧ ?_
· simp_rw [continuousWithinAt_univ,
(TopologicalSpace.Opens.isOpenEmbedding_of_le hUV).continuousAt_iff]
· apply hG.congr_iff
exact (TopologicalSpace.Opens.chartAt_inclusion_symm_eventuallyEq hUV).fun_comp
(chartAt H' (f (Set.inclusion hUV x)) ∘ f)
theorem liftProp_subtype_val {Q : (H → H) → Set H → H → Prop} (hG : LocalInvariantProp G G Q)
(hQ : ∀ y, Q id univ y) (U : Opens M) :
LiftProp Q (Subtype.val : U → M) := by
intro x
show LiftPropAt Q (id ∘ Subtype.val) x
rw [← hG.liftPropAt_iff_comp_subtype_val]
apply hG.liftProp_id hQ
theorem liftProp_inclusion {Q : (H → H) → Set H → H → Prop} (hG : LocalInvariantProp G G Q)
(hQ : ∀ y, Q id univ y) {U V : Opens M} (hUV : U ≤ V) :
LiftProp Q (Opens.inclusion hUV : U → V) := by
intro x
show LiftPropAt Q (id ∘ Opens.inclusion hUV) x
rw [← hG.liftPropAt_iff_comp_inclusion hUV]
apply hG.liftProp_id hQ
end LocalInvariantProp
section LocalStructomorph
variable (G)
open PartialHomeomorph
/-- A function from a model space `H` to itself is a local structomorphism, with respect to a
structure groupoid `G` for `H`, relative to a set `s` in `H`, if for all points `x` in the set, the
function agrees with a `G`-structomorphism on `s` in a neighbourhood of `x`. -/
def IsLocalStructomorphWithinAt (f : H → H) (s : Set H) (x : H) : Prop :=
x ∈ s → ∃ e : PartialHomeomorph H H, e ∈ G ∧ EqOn f e.toFun (s ∩ e.source) ∧ x ∈ e.source
/-- For a groupoid `G` which is `ClosedUnderRestriction`, being a local structomorphism is a local
invariant property. -/
theorem isLocalStructomorphWithinAt_localInvariantProp [ClosedUnderRestriction G] :
LocalInvariantProp G G (IsLocalStructomorphWithinAt G) :=
{ is_local := by
intro s x u f hu hux
constructor
· rintro h hx
rcases h hx.1 with ⟨e, heG, hef, hex⟩
have : s ∩ u ∩ e.source ⊆ s ∩ e.source := by mfld_set_tac
exact ⟨e, heG, hef.mono this, hex⟩
· rintro h hx
rcases h ⟨hx, hux⟩ with ⟨e, heG, hef, hex⟩
refine ⟨e.restr (interior u), ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· exact closedUnderRestriction' heG isOpen_interior
· have : s ∩ u ∩ e.source = s ∩ (e.source ∩ u) := by mfld_set_tac
simpa only [this, interior_interior, hu.interior_eq, mfld_simps] using hef
· simp only [*, interior_interior, hu.interior_eq, mfld_simps]
right_invariance' := by
intro s x f e' he'G he'x h hx
have hxs : x ∈ s := by simpa only [e'.left_inv he'x, mfld_simps] using hx
rcases h hxs with ⟨e, heG, hef, hex⟩
refine ⟨e'.symm.trans e, G.trans (G.symm he'G) heG, ?_, ?_⟩
· intro y hy
simp only [mfld_simps] at hy
simp only [hef ⟨hy.1, hy.2.2⟩, mfld_simps]
· simp only [hex, he'x, mfld_simps]
congr_of_forall := by
intro s x f g hfgs _ h hx
rcases h hx with ⟨e, heG, hef, hex⟩
refine ⟨e, heG, ?_, hex⟩
intro y hy
rw [← hef hy, hfgs y hy.1]
left_invariance' := by
intro s x f e' he'G _ hfx h hx
rcases h hx with ⟨e, heG, hef, hex⟩
refine ⟨e.trans e', G.trans heG he'G, ?_, ?_⟩
· intro y hy
simp only [mfld_simps] at hy
simp only [hef ⟨hy.1, hy.2.1⟩, mfld_simps]
· simpa only [hex, hef ⟨hx, hex⟩, mfld_simps] using hfx }
/-- A slight reformulation of `IsLocalStructomorphWithinAt` when `f` is a partial homeomorph.
This gives us an `e` that is defined on a subset of `f.source`. -/
theorem _root_.PartialHomeomorph.isLocalStructomorphWithinAt_iff {G : StructureGroupoid H}
[ClosedUnderRestriction G] (f : PartialHomeomorph H H) {s : Set H} {x : H}
(hx : x ∈ f.source ∪ sᶜ) :
G.IsLocalStructomorphWithinAt (⇑f) s x ↔
x ∈ s → ∃ e : PartialHomeomorph H H,
e ∈ G ∧ e.source ⊆ f.source ∧ EqOn f (⇑e) (s ∩ e.source) ∧ x ∈ e.source := by
constructor
· intro hf h2x
obtain ⟨e, he, hfe, hxe⟩ := hf h2x
refine ⟨e.restr f.source, closedUnderRestriction' he f.open_source, ?_, ?_, hxe, ?_⟩
· simp_rw [PartialHomeomorph.restr_source]
exact inter_subset_right.trans interior_subset
· intro x' hx'
exact hfe ⟨hx'.1, hx'.2.1⟩
· rw [f.open_source.interior_eq]
exact Or.resolve_right hx (not_not.mpr h2x)
· intro hf hx
obtain ⟨e, he, _, hfe, hxe⟩ := hf hx
exact ⟨e, he, hfe, hxe⟩
/-- A slight reformulation of `IsLocalStructomorphWithinAt` when `f` is a partial homeomorph and
the set we're considering is a superset of `f.source`. -/
theorem _root_.PartialHomeomorph.isLocalStructomorphWithinAt_iff' {G : StructureGroupoid H}
[ClosedUnderRestriction G] (f : PartialHomeomorph H H) {s : Set H} {x : H} (hs : f.source ⊆ s)
(hx : x ∈ f.source ∪ sᶜ) :
G.IsLocalStructomorphWithinAt (⇑f) s x ↔
x ∈ s → ∃ e : PartialHomeomorph H H,
e ∈ G ∧ e.source ⊆ f.source ∧ EqOn f (⇑e) e.source ∧ x ∈ e.source := by
rw [f.isLocalStructomorphWithinAt_iff hx]
refine imp_congr_right fun _ ↦ exists_congr fun e ↦ and_congr_right fun _ ↦ ?_
refine and_congr_right fun h2e ↦ ?_
rw [inter_eq_right.mpr (h2e.trans hs)]
/-- A slight reformulation of `IsLocalStructomorphWithinAt` when `f` is a partial homeomorph and
the set we're considering is `f.source`. -/
theorem _root_.PartialHomeomorph.isLocalStructomorphWithinAt_source_iff {G : StructureGroupoid H}
[ClosedUnderRestriction G] (f : PartialHomeomorph H H) {x : H} :
G.IsLocalStructomorphWithinAt (⇑f) f.source x ↔
x ∈ f.source → ∃ e : PartialHomeomorph H H,
e ∈ G ∧ e.source ⊆ f.source ∧ EqOn f (⇑e) e.source ∧ x ∈ e.source :=
haveI : x ∈ f.source ∪ f.sourceᶜ := by simp_rw [union_compl_self, mem_univ]
f.isLocalStructomorphWithinAt_iff' Subset.rfl this
variable {H₁ : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H₁] {H₂ : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H₂] {H₃ : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace H₃] [ChartedSpace H₁ H₂] [ChartedSpace H₂ H₃] {G₁ : StructureGroupoid H₁}
[HasGroupoid H₂ G₁] [ClosedUnderRestriction G₁] (G₂ : StructureGroupoid H₂) [HasGroupoid H₃ G₂]
theorem HasGroupoid.comp
(H : ∀ e ∈ G₂, LiftPropOn (IsLocalStructomorphWithinAt G₁) (e : H₂ → H₂) e.source) :
@HasGroupoid H₁ _ H₃ _ (ChartedSpace.comp H₁ H₂ H₃) G₁ :=
let _ := ChartedSpace.comp H₁ H₂ H₃ -- Porting note: need this to synthesize `ChartedSpace H₁ H₃`
{ compatible := by
rintro _ _ ⟨e, he, f, hf, rfl⟩ ⟨e', he', f', hf', rfl⟩
apply G₁.locality
intro x hx
simp only [mfld_simps] at hx
have hxs : x ∈ f.symm ⁻¹' (e.symm ≫ₕ e').source := by simp only [hx, mfld_simps]
have hxs' : x ∈ f.target ∩ f.symm ⁻¹' ((e.symm ≫ₕ e').source ∩ e.symm ≫ₕ e' ⁻¹' f'.source) :=
by simp only [hx, mfld_simps]
obtain ⟨φ, hφG₁, hφ, hφ_dom⟩ := LocalInvariantProp.liftPropOn_indep_chart
(isLocalStructomorphWithinAt_localInvariantProp G₁) (G₁.subset_maximalAtlas hf)
(G₁.subset_maximalAtlas hf') (H _ (G₂.compatible he he')) hxs' hxs
simp_rw [← PartialHomeomorph.coe_trans, PartialHomeomorph.trans_assoc] at hφ
simp_rw [PartialHomeomorph.trans_symm_eq_symm_trans_symm, PartialHomeomorph.trans_assoc]
have hs : IsOpen (f.symm ≫ₕ e.symm ≫ₕ e' ≫ₕ f').source :=
(f.symm ≫ₕ e.symm ≫ₕ e' ≫ₕ f').open_source
refine ⟨_, hs.inter φ.open_source, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp only [hx, hφ_dom, mfld_simps]
· refine G₁.mem_of_eqOnSource (closedUnderRestriction' hφG₁ hs) ?_
rw [PartialHomeomorph.restr_source_inter]
refine PartialHomeomorph.Set.EqOn.restr_eqOn_source (hφ.mono ?_)
mfld_set_tac }
end LocalStructomorph
end StructureGroupoid
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/LocalInvariantProperties.lean | 698 | 722 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Algebra
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Convex
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.LinearMap.Rat
import Mathlib.Tactic.Module
/-!
# Inner product space derived from a norm
This file defines an `InnerProductSpace` instance from a norm that respects the
parallellogram identity. The parallelogram identity is a way to express the inner product of `x` and
`y` in terms of the norms of `x`, `y`, `x + y`, `x - y`.
## Main results
- `InnerProductSpace.ofNorm`: a normed space whose norm respects the parallellogram identity,
can be seen as an inner product space.
## Implementation notes
We define `inner_`
$$\langle x, y \rangle := \frac{1}{4} (‖x + y‖^2 - ‖x - y‖^2 + i ‖ix + y‖ ^ 2 - i ‖ix - y‖^2)$$
and use the parallelogram identity
$$‖x + y‖^2 + ‖x - y‖^2 = 2 (‖x‖^2 + ‖y‖^2)$$
to prove it is an inner product, i.e., that it is conjugate-symmetric (`inner_.conj_symm`) and
linear in the first argument. `add_left` is proved by judicious application of the parallelogram
identity followed by tedious arithmetic. `smul_left` is proved step by step, first noting that
$\langle λ x, y \rangle = λ \langle x, y \rangle$ for $λ ∈ ℕ$, $λ = -1$, hence $λ ∈ ℤ$ and $λ ∈ ℚ$
by arithmetic. Then by continuity and the fact that ℚ is dense in ℝ, the same is true for ℝ.
The case of ℂ then follows by applying the result for ℝ and more arithmetic.
## TODO
Move upstream to `Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Basic`.
## References
- [Jordan, P. and von Neumann, J., *On inner products in linear, metric spaces*][Jordan1935]
- https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/21792/norms-induced-by-inner-products-and-the-parallelogram-law
- https://math.dartmouth.edu/archive/m113w10/public_html/jordan-vneumann-thm.pdf
## Tags
inner product space, Hilbert space, norm
-/
open RCLike
open scoped ComplexConjugate
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] (E : Type*) [NormedAddCommGroup E]
/-- Predicate for the parallelogram identity to hold in a normed group. This is a scalar-less
version of `InnerProductSpace`. If you have an `InnerProductSpaceable` assumption, you can
locally upgrade that to `InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E` using `casesI nonempty_innerProductSpace 𝕜 E`.
-/
class InnerProductSpaceable : Prop where
parallelogram_identity :
∀ x y : E, ‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ + ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = 2 * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖)
variable (𝕜) {E}
theorem InnerProductSpace.toInnerProductSpaceable [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] :
InnerProductSpaceable E :=
⟨parallelogram_law_with_norm 𝕜⟩
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) InnerProductSpace.toInnerProductSpaceable_ofReal
[InnerProductSpace ℝ E] : InnerProductSpaceable E :=
⟨parallelogram_law_with_norm ℝ⟩
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
local notation "𝓚" => algebraMap ℝ 𝕜
/-- Auxiliary definition of the inner product derived from the norm. -/
private noncomputable def inner_ (x y : E) : 𝕜 :=
4⁻¹ * (𝓚 ‖x + y‖ * 𝓚 ‖x + y‖ - 𝓚 ‖x - y‖ * 𝓚 ‖x - y‖ +
(I : 𝕜) * 𝓚 ‖(I : 𝕜) • x + y‖ * 𝓚 ‖(I : 𝕜) • x + y‖ -
(I : 𝕜) * 𝓚 ‖(I : 𝕜) • x - y‖ * 𝓚 ‖(I : 𝕜) • x - y‖)
namespace InnerProductSpaceable
variable {𝕜} (E)
-- This has a prime added to avoid clashing with public `innerProp`
/-- Auxiliary definition for the `add_left` property. -/
private def innerProp' (r : 𝕜) : Prop :=
∀ x y : E, inner_ 𝕜 (r • x) y = conj r * inner_ 𝕜 x y
variable {E}
theorem _root_.Continuous.inner_ {f g : ℝ → E} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) :
Continuous fun x => inner_ 𝕜 (f x) (g x) := by
unfold _root_.inner_
| fun_prop
theorem inner_.norm_sq (x : E) : ‖x‖ ^ 2 = re (inner_ 𝕜 x x) := by
simp only [inner_, normSq_apply, ofNat_re, ofNat_im, map_sub, map_add, map_zero, map_mul,
ofReal_re, ofReal_im, mul_re, inv_re, mul_im, I_re, inv_im]
have h₁ : ‖x - x‖ = 0 := by simp
have h₂ : ‖x + x‖ = 2 • ‖x‖ := by convert norm_nsmul 𝕜 2 x using 2; module
rw [h₁, h₂]
ring
theorem inner_.conj_symm (x y : E) : conj (inner_ 𝕜 y x) = inner_ 𝕜 x y := by
simp only [inner_, map_sub, map_add, map_mul, map_inv₀, map_ofNat, conj_ofReal, conj_I]
rw [add_comm y x, norm_sub_rev]
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/OfNorm.lean | 105 | 117 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.Degree
import Mathlib.Algebra.Prime.Lemmas
/-!
# Theory of degrees of polynomials
Some of the main results include
- `natDegree_comp_le` : The degree of the composition is at most the product of degrees
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Finsupp Finset
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {ι : Type w} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
section Degree
theorem natDegree_comp_le : natDegree (p.comp q) ≤ natDegree p * natDegree q :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if h0 : p.comp q = 0 then by rw [h0, natDegree_zero]; exact Nat.zero_le _
else
WithBot.coe_le_coe.1 <|
calc
↑(natDegree (p.comp q)) = degree (p.comp q) := (degree_eq_natDegree h0).symm
_ = _ := congr_arg degree comp_eq_sum_left
_ ≤ _ := degree_sum_le _ _
_ ≤ _ :=
Finset.sup_le fun n hn =>
calc
degree (C (coeff p n) * q ^ n) ≤ degree (C (coeff p n)) + degree (q ^ n) :=
degree_mul_le _ _
_ ≤ natDegree (C (coeff p n)) + n • degree q :=
(add_le_add degree_le_natDegree (degree_pow_le _ _))
_ ≤ natDegree (C (coeff p n)) + n • ↑(natDegree q) :=
(add_le_add_left (nsmul_le_nsmul_right (@degree_le_natDegree _ _ q) n) _)
_ = (n * natDegree q : ℕ) := by
rw [natDegree_C, Nat.cast_zero, zero_add, nsmul_eq_mul]
simp
_ ≤ (natDegree p * natDegree q : ℕ) :=
WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 <|
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (le_natDegree_of_ne_zero (mem_support_iff.1 hn))
(Nat.zero_le _)
theorem natDegree_comp_eq_of_mul_ne_zero (h : p.leadingCoeff * q.leadingCoeff ^ p.natDegree ≠ 0) :
natDegree (p.comp q) = natDegree p * natDegree q := by
by_cases hq : natDegree q = 0
· exact le_antisymm natDegree_comp_le (by simp [hq])
apply natDegree_eq_of_le_of_coeff_ne_zero natDegree_comp_le
rwa [coeff_comp_degree_mul_degree hq]
theorem degree_pos_of_root {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) (h : IsRoot p a) : 0 < degree p :=
lt_of_not_ge fun hlt => by
have := eq_C_of_degree_le_zero hlt
rw [IsRoot, this, eval_C] at h
simp only [h, RingHom.map_zero] at this
exact hp this
theorem natDegree_le_iff_coeff_eq_zero : p.natDegree ≤ n ↔ ∀ N : ℕ, n < N → p.coeff N = 0 := by
simp_rw [natDegree_le_iff_degree_le, degree_le_iff_coeff_zero, Nat.cast_lt]
theorem natDegree_add_le_iff_left {n : ℕ} (p q : R[X]) (qn : q.natDegree ≤ n) :
(p + q).natDegree ≤ n ↔ p.natDegree ≤ n := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => natDegree_add_le_of_degree_le h qn⟩
refine natDegree_le_iff_coeff_eq_zero.mpr fun m hm => ?_
convert natDegree_le_iff_coeff_eq_zero.mp h m hm using 1
rw [coeff_add, natDegree_le_iff_coeff_eq_zero.mp qn _ hm, add_zero]
theorem natDegree_add_le_iff_right {n : ℕ} (p q : R[X]) (pn : p.natDegree ≤ n) :
(p + q).natDegree ≤ n ↔ q.natDegree ≤ n := by
rw [add_comm]
exact natDegree_add_le_iff_left _ _ pn
-- TODO: Do we really want the following two lemmas? They are straightforward consequences of a
-- more atomic lemma
theorem natDegree_C_mul_le (a : R) (f : R[X]) : (C a * f).natDegree ≤ f.natDegree := by
simpa using natDegree_mul_le (p := C a)
theorem natDegree_mul_C_le (f : R[X]) (a : R) : (f * C a).natDegree ≤ f.natDegree := by
simpa using natDegree_mul_le (q := C a)
theorem eq_natDegree_of_le_mem_support (pn : p.natDegree ≤ n) (ns : n ∈ p.support) :
p.natDegree = n :=
le_antisymm pn (le_natDegree_of_mem_supp _ ns)
theorem natDegree_C_mul_eq_of_mul_eq_one {ai : R} (au : ai * a = 1) :
(C a * p).natDegree = p.natDegree :=
le_antisymm (natDegree_C_mul_le a p)
(calc
p.natDegree = (1 * p).natDegree := by nth_rw 1 [← one_mul p]
_ = (C ai * (C a * p)).natDegree := by rw [← C_1, ← au, RingHom.map_mul, ← mul_assoc]
_ ≤ (C a * p).natDegree := natDegree_C_mul_le ai (C a * p))
theorem natDegree_mul_C_eq_of_mul_eq_one {ai : R} (au : a * ai = 1) :
(p * C a).natDegree = p.natDegree :=
le_antisymm (natDegree_mul_C_le p a)
(calc
p.natDegree = (p * 1).natDegree := by nth_rw 1 [← mul_one p]
_ = (p * C a * C ai).natDegree := by rw [← C_1, ← au, RingHom.map_mul, ← mul_assoc]
_ ≤ (p * C a).natDegree := natDegree_mul_C_le (p * C a) ai)
/-- Although not explicitly stated, the assumptions of lemma `natDegree_mul_C_eq_of_mul_ne_zero`
force the polynomial `p` to be non-zero, via `p.leadingCoeff ≠ 0`.
-/
theorem natDegree_mul_C_eq_of_mul_ne_zero (h : p.leadingCoeff * a ≠ 0) :
(p * C a).natDegree = p.natDegree := by
refine eq_natDegree_of_le_mem_support (natDegree_mul_C_le p a) ?_
refine mem_support_iff.mpr ?_
rwa [coeff_mul_C]
/-- Although not explicitly stated, the assumptions of lemma `natDegree_C_mul_of_mul_ne_zero`
force the polynomial `p` to be non-zero, via `p.leadingCoeff ≠ 0`.
-/
theorem natDegree_C_mul_of_mul_ne_zero (h : a * p.leadingCoeff ≠ 0) :
(C a * p).natDegree = p.natDegree := by
refine eq_natDegree_of_le_mem_support (natDegree_C_mul_le a p) ?_
refine mem_support_iff.mpr ?_
rwa [coeff_C_mul]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-03")]
alias natDegree_C_mul_eq_of_mul_ne_zero := natDegree_C_mul_of_mul_ne_zero
lemma degree_C_mul_of_mul_ne_zero (h : a * p.leadingCoeff ≠ 0) : (C a * p).degree = p.degree := by
rw [degree_mul' (by simpa)]; simp [left_ne_zero_of_mul h]
theorem natDegree_add_coeff_mul (f g : R[X]) :
(f * g).coeff (f.natDegree + g.natDegree) = f.coeff f.natDegree * g.coeff g.natDegree := by
simp only [coeff_natDegree, coeff_mul_degree_add_degree]
theorem natDegree_lt_coeff_mul (h : p.natDegree + q.natDegree < m + n) :
(p * q).coeff (m + n) = 0 :=
coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt (natDegree_mul_le.trans_lt h)
theorem coeff_mul_of_natDegree_le (pm : p.natDegree ≤ m) (qn : q.natDegree ≤ n) :
(p * q).coeff (m + n) = p.coeff m * q.coeff n := by
simp_rw [← Polynomial.toFinsupp_apply, toFinsupp_mul]
refine AddMonoidAlgebra.apply_add_of_supDegree_le ?_ Function.injective_id ?_ ?_
· simp
· rwa [supDegree_eq_natDegree, id_eq]
· rwa [supDegree_eq_natDegree, id_eq]
theorem coeff_pow_of_natDegree_le (pn : p.natDegree ≤ n) :
(p ^ m).coeff (m * n) = p.coeff n ^ m := by
induction' m with m hm
· simp
· rw [pow_succ, pow_succ, ← hm, Nat.succ_mul, coeff_mul_of_natDegree_le _ pn]
refine natDegree_pow_le.trans (le_trans ?_ (le_refl _))
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left pn m.zero_le
theorem coeff_pow_eq_ite_of_natDegree_le_of_le {o : ℕ}
(pn : natDegree p ≤ n) (mno : m * n ≤ o) :
coeff (p ^ m) o = if o = m * n then (coeff p n) ^ m else 0 := by
rcases eq_or_ne o (m * n) with rfl | h
· simpa only [ite_true] using coeff_pow_of_natDegree_le pn
· simpa only [h, ite_false] using coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt <|
lt_of_le_of_lt (natDegree_pow_le_of_le m pn) (lt_of_le_of_ne mno h.symm)
theorem coeff_add_eq_left_of_lt (qn : q.natDegree < n) : (p + q).coeff n = p.coeff n :=
(coeff_add _ _ _).trans <|
(congr_arg _ <| coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt <| qn).trans <| add_zero _
theorem coeff_add_eq_right_of_lt (pn : p.natDegree < n) : (p + q).coeff n = q.coeff n := by
rw [add_comm]
exact coeff_add_eq_left_of_lt pn
open scoped Function -- required for scoped `on` notation
theorem degree_sum_eq_of_disjoint (f : S → R[X]) (s : Finset S)
(h : Set.Pairwise { i | i ∈ s ∧ f i ≠ 0 } (Ne on degree ∘ f)) :
degree (s.sum f) = s.sup fun i => degree (f i) := by
classical
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with x s hx IH
· simp
· simp only [hx, Finset.sum_insert, not_false_iff, Finset.sup_insert]
specialize IH (h.mono fun _ => by simp +contextual)
rcases lt_trichotomy (degree (f x)) (degree (s.sum f)) with (H | H | H)
· rw [← IH, sup_eq_right.mpr H.le, degree_add_eq_right_of_degree_lt H]
· rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with (rfl | hs)
· simp
obtain ⟨y, hy, hy'⟩ := Finset.exists_mem_eq_sup s hs fun i => degree (f i)
rw [IH, hy'] at H
by_cases hx0 : f x = 0
· simp [hx0, IH]
have hy0 : f y ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! H
simpa [H, degree_eq_bot] using hx0
refine absurd H (h ?_ ?_ fun H => hx ?_)
· simp [hx0]
· simp [hy, hy0]
· exact H.symm ▸ hy
· rw [← IH, sup_eq_left.mpr H.le, degree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt H]
theorem natDegree_sum_eq_of_disjoint (f : S → R[X]) (s : Finset S)
(h : Set.Pairwise { i | i ∈ s ∧ f i ≠ 0 } (Ne on natDegree ∘ f)) :
natDegree (s.sum f) = s.sup fun i => natDegree (f i) := by
by_cases H : ∃ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0
· obtain ⟨x, hx, hx'⟩ := H
have hs : s.Nonempty := ⟨x, hx⟩
refine natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some ?_
rw [degree_sum_eq_of_disjoint]
· rw [← Finset.sup'_eq_sup hs, ← Finset.sup'_eq_sup hs,
Nat.cast_withBot, Finset.coe_sup' hs, ←
Finset.sup'_eq_sup hs]
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· rw [Finset.sup'_le_iff]
intro b hb
by_cases hb' : f b = 0
· simpa [hb'] using hs
rw [degree_eq_natDegree hb', Nat.cast_withBot]
exact Finset.le_sup' (fun i : S => (natDegree (f i) : WithBot ℕ)) hb
· rw [Finset.sup'_le_iff]
intro b hb
simp only [Finset.le_sup'_iff, exists_prop, Function.comp_apply]
by_cases hb' : f b = 0
· refine ⟨x, hx, ?_⟩
contrapose! hx'
simpa [← Nat.cast_withBot, hb', degree_eq_bot] using hx'
exact ⟨b, hb, (degree_eq_natDegree hb').ge⟩
· exact h.imp fun x y hxy hxy' => hxy (natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq hxy')
· push_neg at H
rw [Finset.sum_eq_zero H, natDegree_zero, eq_comm, show 0 = ⊥ from rfl, Finset.sup_eq_bot_iff]
intro x hx
simp [H x hx]
variable [Semiring S]
theorem natDegree_pos_of_eval₂_root {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) (f : R →+* S) {z : S}
(hz : eval₂ f z p = 0) (inj : ∀ x : R, f x = 0 → x = 0) : 0 < natDegree p :=
lt_of_not_ge fun hlt => by
have A : p = C (p.coeff 0) := eq_C_of_natDegree_le_zero hlt
rw [A, eval₂_C] at hz
simp only [inj (p.coeff 0) hz, RingHom.map_zero] at A
exact hp A
theorem degree_pos_of_eval₂_root {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) (f : R →+* S) {z : S}
(hz : eval₂ f z p = 0) (inj : ∀ x : R, f x = 0 → x = 0) : 0 < degree p :=
natDegree_pos_iff_degree_pos.mp (natDegree_pos_of_eval₂_root hp f hz inj)
@[simp]
theorem coe_lt_degree {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} : (n : WithBot ℕ) < degree p ↔ n < natDegree p := by
by_cases h : p = 0
· simp [h]
simp [degree_eq_natDegree h, Nat.cast_lt]
@[simp]
theorem degree_map_eq_iff {f : R →+* S} {p : Polynomial R} :
degree (map f p) = degree p ↔ f (leadingCoeff p) ≠ 0 ∨ p = 0 := by
rcases eq_or_ne p 0 with h|h
· simp [h]
simp only [h, or_false]
refine ⟨fun h2 ↦ ?_, degree_map_eq_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero f⟩
have h3 : natDegree (map f p) = natDegree p := by simp_rw [natDegree, h2]
have h4 : map f p ≠ 0 := by
rwa [ne_eq, ← degree_eq_bot, h2, degree_eq_bot]
rwa [← coeff_natDegree, ← coeff_map, ← h3, coeff_natDegree, ne_eq, leadingCoeff_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_map_eq_iff {f : R →+* S} {p : Polynomial R} :
natDegree (map f p) = natDegree p ↔ f (p.leadingCoeff) ≠ 0 ∨ natDegree p = 0 := by
rcases eq_or_ne (natDegree p) 0 with h|h
· simp_rw [h, ne_eq, or_true, iff_true, ← Nat.le_zero, ← h, natDegree_map_le]
have h2 : p ≠ 0 := by rintro rfl; simp at h
simp_all [natDegree, WithBot.unbotD_eq_unbotD_iff]
theorem natDegree_pos_of_nextCoeff_ne_zero (h : p.nextCoeff ≠ 0) : 0 < p.natDegree := by
rw [nextCoeff] at h
by_cases hpz : p.natDegree = 0
· simp_all only [ne_eq, zero_le, ite_true, not_true_eq_false]
· apply Nat.zero_lt_of_ne_zero hpz
end Degree
end Semiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem natDegree_sub : (p - q).natDegree = (q - p).natDegree := by rw [← natDegree_neg, neg_sub]
theorem natDegree_sub_le_iff_left (qn : q.natDegree ≤ n) :
(p - q).natDegree ≤ n ↔ p.natDegree ≤ n := by
rw [← natDegree_neg] at qn
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, natDegree_add_le_iff_left _ _ qn]
theorem natDegree_sub_le_iff_right (pn : p.natDegree ≤ n) :
(p - q).natDegree ≤ n ↔ q.natDegree ≤ n := by rwa [natDegree_sub, natDegree_sub_le_iff_left]
theorem coeff_sub_eq_left_of_lt (dg : q.natDegree < n) : (p - q).coeff n = p.coeff n := by
rw [← natDegree_neg] at dg
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, coeff_add_eq_left_of_lt dg]
theorem coeff_sub_eq_neg_right_of_lt (df : p.natDegree < n) : (p - q).coeff n = -q.coeff n := by
rwa [sub_eq_add_neg, coeff_add_eq_right_of_lt, coeff_neg]
end Ring
section NoZeroDivisors
variable [Semiring R] {p q : R[X]} {a : R}
@[simp]
lemma nextCoeff_C_mul_X_add_C (ha : a ≠ 0) (c : R) : nextCoeff (C a * X + C c) = c := by
rw [nextCoeff_of_natDegree_pos] <;> simp [ha]
lemma natDegree_eq_one : p.natDegree = 1 ↔ ∃ a ≠ 0, ∃ b, C a * X + C b = p := by
refine ⟨fun hp ↦ ⟨p.coeff 1, fun h ↦ ?_, p.coeff 0, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rw [← hp, coeff_natDegree, leadingCoeff_eq_zero] at h
aesop
· ext n
obtain _ | _ | n := n
· simp
· simp
· simp only [coeff_add, coeff_mul_X, coeff_C_succ, add_zero]
rw [coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt]
simp [hp]
· rintro ⟨a, ha, b, rfl⟩
simp [ha]
variable [NoZeroDivisors R]
theorem degree_mul_C (a0 : a ≠ 0) : (p * C a).degree = p.degree := by
rw [degree_mul, degree_C a0, add_zero]
|
theorem degree_C_mul (a0 : a ≠ 0) : (C a * p).degree = p.degree := by
rw [degree_mul, degree_C a0, zero_add]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Degree/Lemmas.lean | 341 | 343 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Shing Tak Lam. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Shing Tak Lam
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Homotopy.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Connected.PathConnected
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Basic
/-!
# Homotopy between paths
In this file, we define a `Homotopy` between two `Path`s. In addition, we define a relation
`Homotopic` on `Path`s, and prove that it is an equivalence relation.
## Definitions
* `Path.Homotopy p₀ p₁` is the type of homotopies between paths `p₀` and `p₁`
* `Path.Homotopy.refl p` is the constant homotopy between `p` and itself
* `Path.Homotopy.symm F` is the `Path.Homotopy p₁ p₀` defined by reversing the homotopy
* `Path.Homotopy.trans F G`, where `F : Path.Homotopy p₀ p₁`, `G : Path.Homotopy p₁ p₂` is the
`Path.Homotopy p₀ p₂` defined by putting the first homotopy on `[0, 1/2]` and the second on
`[1/2, 1]`
* `Path.Homotopy.hcomp F G`, where `F : Path.Homotopy p₀ q₀` and `G : Path.Homotopy p₁ q₁` is
a `Path.Homotopy (p₀.trans p₁) (q₀.trans q₁)`
* `Path.Homotopic p₀ p₁` is the relation saying that there is a homotopy between `p₀` and `p₁`
* `Path.Homotopic.setoid x₀ x₁` is the setoid on `Path`s from `Path.Homotopic`
* `Path.Homotopic.Quotient x₀ x₁` is the quotient type from `Path x₀ x₀` by `Path.Homotopic.setoid`
-/
universe u v
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y]
variable {x₀ x₁ x₂ x₃ : X}
noncomputable section
open unitInterval
namespace Path
/-- The type of homotopies between two paths.
-/
abbrev Homotopy (p₀ p₁ : Path x₀ x₁) :=
ContinuousMap.HomotopyRel p₀.toContinuousMap p₁.toContinuousMap {0, 1}
namespace Homotopy
section
variable {p₀ p₁ : Path x₀ x₁}
theorem coeFn_injective : @Function.Injective (Homotopy p₀ p₁) (I × I → X) (⇑) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective
@[simp]
theorem source (F : Homotopy p₀ p₁) (t : I) : F (t, 0) = x₀ :=
calc F (t, 0) = p₀ 0 := ContinuousMap.HomotopyRel.eq_fst _ _ (.inl rfl)
_ = x₀ := p₀.source
@[simp]
theorem target (F : Homotopy p₀ p₁) (t : I) : F (t, 1) = x₁ :=
calc F (t, 1) = p₀ 1 := ContinuousMap.HomotopyRel.eq_fst _ _ (.inr rfl)
_ = x₁ := p₀.target
/-- Evaluating a path homotopy at an intermediate point, giving us a `Path`.
-/
def eval (F : Homotopy p₀ p₁) (t : I) : Path x₀ x₁ where
toFun := F.toHomotopy.curry t
source' := by simp
target' := by simp
@[simp]
theorem eval_zero (F : Homotopy p₀ p₁) : F.eval 0 = p₀ := by
ext t
simp [eval]
@[simp]
theorem eval_one (F : Homotopy p₀ p₁) : F.eval 1 = p₁ := by
ext t
simp [eval]
end
section
variable {p₀ p₁ p₂ : Path x₀ x₁}
/-- Given a path `p`, we can define a `Homotopy p p` by `F (t, x) = p x`.
-/
@[simps!]
def refl (p : Path x₀ x₁) : Homotopy p p :=
ContinuousMap.HomotopyRel.refl p.toContinuousMap {0, 1}
/-- Given a `Homotopy p₀ p₁`, we can define a `Homotopy p₁ p₀` by reversing the homotopy.
-/
@[simps!]
def symm (F : Homotopy p₀ p₁) : Homotopy p₁ p₀ :=
ContinuousMap.HomotopyRel.symm F
@[simp]
theorem symm_symm (F : Homotopy p₀ p₁) : F.symm.symm = F :=
ContinuousMap.HomotopyRel.symm_symm F
theorem symm_bijective : Function.Bijective (Homotopy.symm : Homotopy p₀ p₁ → Homotopy p₁ p₀) :=
Function.bijective_iff_has_inverse.mpr ⟨_, symm_symm, symm_symm⟩
/--
Given `Homotopy p₀ p₁` and `Homotopy p₁ p₂`, we can define a `Homotopy p₀ p₂` by putting the first
homotopy on `[0, 1/2]` and the second on `[1/2, 1]`.
-/
def trans (F : Homotopy p₀ p₁) (G : Homotopy p₁ p₂) : Homotopy p₀ p₂ :=
ContinuousMap.HomotopyRel.trans F G
theorem trans_apply (F : Homotopy p₀ p₁) (G : Homotopy p₁ p₂) (x : I × I) :
(F.trans G) x =
if h : (x.1 : ℝ) ≤ 1 / 2 then
F (⟨2 * x.1, (unitInterval.mul_pos_mem_iff zero_lt_two).2 ⟨x.1.2.1, h⟩⟩, x.2)
else
G (⟨2 * x.1 - 1, unitInterval.two_mul_sub_one_mem_iff.2 ⟨(not_le.1 h).le, x.1.2.2⟩⟩, x.2) :=
ContinuousMap.HomotopyRel.trans_apply _ _ _
theorem symm_trans (F : Homotopy p₀ p₁) (G : Homotopy p₁ p₂) :
(F.trans G).symm = G.symm.trans F.symm :=
ContinuousMap.HomotopyRel.symm_trans _ _
/-- Casting a `Homotopy p₀ p₁` to a `Homotopy q₀ q₁` where `p₀ = q₀` and `p₁ = q₁`. -/
@[simps!]
def cast {p₀ p₁ q₀ q₁ : Path x₀ x₁} (F : Homotopy p₀ p₁) (h₀ : p₀ = q₀) (h₁ : p₁ = q₁) :
Homotopy q₀ q₁ :=
ContinuousMap.HomotopyRel.cast F (congr_arg _ h₀) (congr_arg _ h₁)
end
section
variable {p₀ q₀ : Path x₀ x₁} {p₁ q₁ : Path x₁ x₂}
/-- Suppose `p₀` and `q₀` are paths from `x₀` to `x₁`, `p₁` and `q₁` are paths from `x₁` to `x₂`.
Furthermore, suppose `F : Homotopy p₀ q₀` and `G : Homotopy p₁ q₁`. Then we can define a homotopy
from `p₀.trans p₁` to `q₀.trans q₁`.
-/
def hcomp (F : Homotopy p₀ q₀) (G : Homotopy p₁ q₁) : Homotopy (p₀.trans p₁) (q₀.trans q₁) where
toFun x :=
if (x.2 : ℝ) ≤ 1 / 2 then (F.eval x.1).extend (2 * x.2) else (G.eval x.1).extend (2 * x.2 - 1)
continuous_toFun := continuous_if_le (continuous_induced_dom.comp continuous_snd) continuous_const
(F.toHomotopy.continuous.comp (by continuity)).continuousOn
(G.toHomotopy.continuous.comp (by continuity)).continuousOn fun x hx => by norm_num [hx]
map_zero_left x := by simp [Path.trans]
map_one_left x := by simp [Path.trans]
prop' x t ht := by
rcases ht with ht | ht
· norm_num [ht]
· rw [Set.mem_singleton_iff] at ht
norm_num [ht]
theorem hcomp_apply (F : Homotopy p₀ q₀) (G : Homotopy p₁ q₁) (x : I × I) :
F.hcomp G x =
if h : (x.2 : ℝ) ≤ 1 / 2 then
F.eval x.1 ⟨2 * x.2, (unitInterval.mul_pos_mem_iff zero_lt_two).2 ⟨x.2.2.1, h⟩⟩
else
G.eval x.1
⟨2 * x.2 - 1, unitInterval.two_mul_sub_one_mem_iff.2 ⟨(not_le.1 h).le, x.2.2.2⟩⟩ :=
show ite _ _ _ = _ by split_ifs <;> exact Path.extend_extends _ _
theorem hcomp_half (F : Homotopy p₀ q₀) (G : Homotopy p₁ q₁) (t : I) :
F.hcomp G (t, ⟨1 / 2, by norm_num, by norm_num⟩) = x₁ :=
show ite _ _ _ = _ by norm_num
end
/--
Suppose `p` is a path, then we have a homotopy from `p` to `p.reparam f` by the convexity of `I`.
-/
def reparam (p : Path x₀ x₁) (f : I → I) (hf : Continuous f) (hf₀ : f 0 = 0) (hf₁ : f 1 = 1) :
Homotopy p (p.reparam f hf hf₀ hf₁) where
toFun x := p ⟨σ x.1 * x.2 + x.1 * f x.2,
show (σ x.1 : ℝ) • (x.2 : ℝ) + (x.1 : ℝ) • (f x.2 : ℝ) ∈ I from
convex_Icc _ _ x.2.2 (f x.2).2 (by unit_interval) (by unit_interval) (by simp)⟩
map_zero_left x := by norm_num
map_one_left x := by norm_num
prop' t x hx := by
rcases hx with hx | hx
| · rw [hx]
simp [hf₀]
· rw [Set.mem_singleton_iff] at hx
| Mathlib/Topology/Homotopy/Path.lean | 186 | 188 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Basis
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.DMatrix
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Abelian
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Trace
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.SkewAdjoint
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.SymplecticGroup
/-!
# Classical Lie algebras
This file is the place to find definitions and basic properties of the classical Lie algebras:
* Aₗ = sl(l+1)
* Bₗ ≃ so(l+1, l) ≃ so(2l+1)
* Cₗ = sp(l)
* Dₗ ≃ so(l, l) ≃ so(2l)
## Main definitions
* `LieAlgebra.SpecialLinear.sl`
* `LieAlgebra.Symplectic.sp`
* `LieAlgebra.Orthogonal.so`
* `LieAlgebra.Orthogonal.so'`
* `LieAlgebra.Orthogonal.soIndefiniteEquiv`
* `LieAlgebra.Orthogonal.typeD`
* `LieAlgebra.Orthogonal.typeB`
* `LieAlgebra.Orthogonal.typeDEquivSo'`
* `LieAlgebra.Orthogonal.typeBEquivSo'`
## Implementation notes
### Matrices or endomorphisms
Given a finite type and a commutative ring, the corresponding square matrices are equivalent to the
endomorphisms of the corresponding finite-rank free module as Lie algebras, see `lieEquivMatrix'`.
We can thus define the classical Lie algebras as Lie subalgebras either of matrices or of
endomorphisms. We have opted for the former. At the time of writing (August 2020) it is unclear
which approach should be preferred so the choice should be assumed to be somewhat arbitrary.
### Diagonal quadratic form or diagonal Cartan subalgebra
For the algebras of type `B` and `D`, there are two natural definitions. For example since the
`2l × 2l` matrix:
$$
J = \left[\begin{array}{cc}
0_l & 1_l\\
1_l & 0_l
\end{array}\right]
$$
defines a symmetric bilinear form equivalent to that defined by the identity matrix `I`, we can
define the algebras of type `D` to be the Lie subalgebra of skew-adjoint matrices either for `J` or
for `I`. Both definitions have their advantages (in particular the `J`-skew-adjoint matrices define
a Lie algebra for which the diagonal matrices form a Cartan subalgebra) and so we provide both.
We thus also provide equivalences `typeDEquivSo'`, `soIndefiniteEquiv` which show the two
definitions are equivalent. Similarly for the algebras of type `B`.
## Tags
classical lie algebra, special linear, symplectic, orthogonal
-/
universe u₁ u₂
namespace LieAlgebra
open Matrix
open scoped Matrix
variable (n p q l : Type*) (R : Type u₂)
variable [DecidableEq n] [DecidableEq p] [DecidableEq q] [DecidableEq l]
variable [CommRing R]
@[simp]
theorem matrix_trace_commutator_zero [Fintype n] (X Y : Matrix n n R) : Matrix.trace ⁅X, Y⁆ = 0 :=
calc
_ = Matrix.trace (X * Y) - Matrix.trace (Y * X) := trace_sub _ _
_ = Matrix.trace (X * Y) - Matrix.trace (X * Y) :=
(congr_arg (fun x => _ - x) (Matrix.trace_mul_comm Y X))
_ = 0 := sub_self _
namespace SpecialLinear
/-- The special linear Lie algebra: square matrices of trace zero. -/
def sl [Fintype n] : LieSubalgebra R (Matrix n n R) :=
{ LinearMap.ker (Matrix.traceLinearMap n R R) with
lie_mem' := fun _ _ => LinearMap.mem_ker.2 <| matrix_trace_commutator_zero _ _ _ _ }
theorem sl_bracket [Fintype n] (A B : sl n R) : ⁅A, B⁆.val = A.val * B.val - B.val * A.val :=
rfl
section ElementaryBasis
variable {n} [Fintype n] (i j : n)
/-- When j ≠ i, the elementary matrices are elements of sl n R, in fact they are part of a natural
basis of `sl n R`. -/
def Eb (h : j ≠ i) : sl n R :=
⟨Matrix.stdBasisMatrix i j (1 : R),
show Matrix.stdBasisMatrix i j (1 : R) ∈ LinearMap.ker (Matrix.traceLinearMap n R R) from
Matrix.StdBasisMatrix.trace_zero i j (1 : R) h⟩
@[simp]
theorem eb_val (h : j ≠ i) : (Eb R i j h).val = Matrix.stdBasisMatrix i j 1 :=
rfl
end ElementaryBasis
theorem sl_non_abelian [Fintype n] [Nontrivial R] (h : 1 < Fintype.card n) :
¬IsLieAbelian (sl n R) := by
rcases Fintype.exists_pair_of_one_lt_card h with ⟨j, i, hij⟩
let A := Eb R i j hij
let B := Eb R j i hij.symm
intro c
have c' : A.val * B.val = B.val * A.val := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← sl_bracket, c.trivial, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero]
simpa [A, B, stdBasisMatrix, Matrix.mul_apply, hij] using congr_fun (congr_fun c' i) i
end SpecialLinear
namespace Symplectic
/-- The symplectic Lie algebra: skew-adjoint matrices with respect to the canonical skew-symmetric
bilinear form. -/
def sp [Fintype l] : LieSubalgebra R (Matrix (l ⊕ l) (l ⊕ l) R) :=
skewAdjointMatricesLieSubalgebra (Matrix.J l R)
end Symplectic
namespace Orthogonal
/-- The definite orthogonal Lie subalgebra: skew-adjoint matrices with respect to the symmetric
bilinear form defined by the identity matrix. -/
def so [Fintype n] : LieSubalgebra R (Matrix n n R) :=
skewAdjointMatricesLieSubalgebra (1 : Matrix n n R)
@[simp]
theorem mem_so [Fintype n] (A : Matrix n n R) : A ∈ so n R ↔ Aᵀ = -A := by
rw [so, mem_skewAdjointMatricesLieSubalgebra, mem_skewAdjointMatricesSubmodule]
simp only [Matrix.IsSkewAdjoint, Matrix.IsAdjointPair, Matrix.mul_one, Matrix.one_mul]
/-- The indefinite diagonal matrix with `p` 1s and `q` -1s. -/
def indefiniteDiagonal : Matrix (p ⊕ q) (p ⊕ q) R :=
Matrix.diagonal <| Sum.elim (fun _ => 1) fun _ => -1
/-- The indefinite orthogonal Lie subalgebra: skew-adjoint matrices with respect to the symmetric
bilinear form defined by the indefinite diagonal matrix. -/
def so' [Fintype p] [Fintype q] : LieSubalgebra R (Matrix (p ⊕ q) (p ⊕ q) R) :=
skewAdjointMatricesLieSubalgebra <| indefiniteDiagonal p q R
/-- A matrix for transforming the indefinite diagonal bilinear form into the definite one, provided
the parameter `i` is a square root of -1. -/
def Pso (i : R) : Matrix (p ⊕ q) (p ⊕ q) R :=
Matrix.diagonal <| Sum.elim (fun _ => 1) fun _ => i
variable [Fintype p] [Fintype q]
theorem pso_inv {i : R} (hi : i * i = -1) : Pso p q R i * Pso p q R (-i) = 1 := by
ext (x y); rcases x with ⟨x⟩|⟨x⟩ <;> rcases y with ⟨y⟩|⟨y⟩
· -- x y : p
by_cases h : x = y <;>
simp [Pso, indefiniteDiagonal, h, one_apply]
· -- x : p, y : q
simp [Pso, indefiniteDiagonal]
· -- x : q, y : p
simp [Pso, indefiniteDiagonal]
· -- x y : q
by_cases h : x = y <;>
simp [Pso, indefiniteDiagonal, h, hi, one_apply]
/-- There is a constructive inverse of `Pso p q R i`. -/
def invertiblePso {i : R} (hi : i * i = -1) : Invertible (Pso p q R i) :=
invertibleOfRightInverse _ _ (pso_inv p q R hi)
theorem indefiniteDiagonal_transform {i : R} (hi : i * i = -1) :
(Pso p q R i)ᵀ * indefiniteDiagonal p q R * Pso p q R i = 1 := by
ext (x y); rcases x with ⟨x⟩|⟨x⟩ <;> rcases y with ⟨y⟩|⟨y⟩
· -- x y : p
by_cases h : x = y <;>
simp [Pso, indefiniteDiagonal, h, one_apply]
· -- x : p, y : q
simp [Pso, indefiniteDiagonal]
· -- x : q, y : p
simp [Pso, indefiniteDiagonal]
· -- x y : q
by_cases h : x = y <;>
simp [Pso, indefiniteDiagonal, h, hi, one_apply]
/-- An equivalence between the indefinite and definite orthogonal Lie algebras, over a ring
containing a square root of -1. -/
noncomputable def soIndefiniteEquiv {i : R} (hi : i * i = -1) : so' p q R ≃ₗ⁅R⁆ so (p ⊕ q) R := by
apply
(skewAdjointMatricesLieSubalgebraEquiv (indefiniteDiagonal p q R) (Pso p q R i)
(invertiblePso p q R hi)).trans
apply LieEquiv.ofEq
ext A; rw [indefiniteDiagonal_transform p q R hi]; rfl
theorem soIndefiniteEquiv_apply {i : R} (hi : i * i = -1) (A : so' p q R) :
(soIndefiniteEquiv p q R hi A : Matrix (p ⊕ q) (p ⊕ q) R) =
(Pso p q R i)⁻¹ * (A : Matrix (p ⊕ q) (p ⊕ q) R) * Pso p q R i := by
rw [soIndefiniteEquiv, LieEquiv.trans_apply, LieEquiv.ofEq_apply]
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2644
erw [skewAdjointMatricesLieSubalgebraEquiv_apply]
/-- A matrix defining a canonical even-rank symmetric bilinear form.
It looks like this as a `2l x 2l` matrix of `l x l` blocks:
[ 0 1 ]
[ 1 0 ]
-/
def JD : Matrix (l ⊕ l) (l ⊕ l) R :=
Matrix.fromBlocks 0 1 1 0
/-- The classical Lie algebra of type D as a Lie subalgebra of matrices associated to the matrix
`JD`. -/
def typeD [Fintype l] :=
skewAdjointMatricesLieSubalgebra (JD l R)
/-- A matrix transforming the bilinear form defined by the matrix `JD` into a split-signature
diagonal matrix.
It looks like this as a `2l x 2l` matrix of `l x l` blocks:
[ 1 -1 ]
[ 1 1 ]
-/
def PD : Matrix (l ⊕ l) (l ⊕ l) R :=
Matrix.fromBlocks 1 (-1) 1 1
/-- The split-signature diagonal matrix. -/
def S :=
indefiniteDiagonal l l R
theorem s_as_blocks : S l R = Matrix.fromBlocks 1 0 0 (-1) := by
rw [← Matrix.diagonal_one, Matrix.diagonal_neg, Matrix.fromBlocks_diagonal]
rfl
theorem jd_transform [Fintype l] : (PD l R)ᵀ * JD l R * PD l R = (2 : R) • S l R := by
have h : (PD l R)ᵀ * JD l R = Matrix.fromBlocks 1 1 1 (-1) := by
simp [PD, JD, Matrix.fromBlocks_transpose, Matrix.fromBlocks_multiply]
rw [h, PD, s_as_blocks, Matrix.fromBlocks_multiply, Matrix.fromBlocks_smul]
simp [two_smul]
theorem pd_inv [Fintype l] [Invertible (2 : R)] : PD l R * ⅟ (2 : R) • (PD l R)ᵀ = 1 := by
rw [PD, Matrix.fromBlocks_transpose, Matrix.fromBlocks_smul,
Matrix.fromBlocks_multiply]
simp
instance invertiblePD [Fintype l] [Invertible (2 : R)] : Invertible (PD l R) :=
invertibleOfRightInverse _ _ (pd_inv l R)
/-- An equivalence between two possible definitions of the classical Lie algebra of type D. -/
noncomputable def typeDEquivSo' [Fintype l] [Invertible (2 : R)] : typeD l R ≃ₗ⁅R⁆ so' l l R := by
apply (skewAdjointMatricesLieSubalgebraEquiv (JD l R) (PD l R) (by infer_instance)).trans
apply LieEquiv.ofEq
ext A
rw [jd_transform, ← val_unitOfInvertible (2 : R), ← Units.smul_def, LieSubalgebra.mem_coe,
mem_skewAdjointMatricesLieSubalgebra_unit_smul]
rfl
/-- A matrix defining a canonical odd-rank symmetric bilinear form.
It looks like this as a `(2l+1) x (2l+1)` matrix of blocks:
[ 2 0 0 ]
[ 0 0 1 ]
[ 0 1 0 ]
where sizes of the blocks are:
[`1 x 1` `1 x l` `1 x l`]
[`l x 1` `l x l` `l x l`]
[`l x 1` `l x l` `l x l`]
-/
def JB :=
Matrix.fromBlocks ((2 : R) • (1 : Matrix Unit Unit R)) 0 0 (JD l R)
/-- The classical Lie algebra of type B as a Lie subalgebra of matrices associated to the matrix
`JB`. -/
def typeB [Fintype l] :=
skewAdjointMatricesLieSubalgebra (JB l R)
/-- A matrix transforming the bilinear form defined by the matrix `JB` into an
almost-split-signature diagonal matrix.
It looks like this as a `(2l+1) x (2l+1)` matrix of blocks:
[ 1 0 0 ]
[ 0 1 -1 ]
[ 0 1 1 ]
where sizes of the blocks are:
[`1 x 1` `1 x l` `1 x l`]
[`l x 1` `l x l` `l x l`]
[`l x 1` `l x l` `l x l`]
-/
def PB :=
Matrix.fromBlocks (1 : Matrix Unit Unit R) 0 0 (PD l R)
variable [Fintype l]
theorem pb_inv [Invertible (2 : R)] : PB l R * Matrix.fromBlocks 1 0 0 (⅟ (PD l R)) = 1 := by
rw [PB, Matrix.fromBlocks_multiply, mul_invOf_self]
simp only [Matrix.mul_zero, Matrix.mul_one, Matrix.zero_mul, zero_add, add_zero,
Matrix.fromBlocks_one]
instance invertiblePB [Invertible (2 : R)] : Invertible (PB l R) :=
invertibleOfRightInverse _ _ (pb_inv l R)
theorem jb_transform : (PB l R)ᵀ * JB l R * PB l R = (2 : R) • Matrix.fromBlocks 1 0 0 (S l R) := by
simp [PB, JB, jd_transform, Matrix.fromBlocks_transpose, Matrix.fromBlocks_multiply,
Matrix.fromBlocks_smul]
theorem indefiniteDiagonal_assoc :
indefiniteDiagonal (Unit ⊕ l) l R =
Matrix.reindexLieEquiv (Equiv.sumAssoc Unit l l).symm
(Matrix.fromBlocks 1 0 0 (indefiniteDiagonal l l R)) := by
ext ⟨⟨i₁ | i₂⟩ | i₃⟩ ⟨⟨j₁ | j₂⟩ | j₃⟩ <;>
simp only [indefiniteDiagonal, Matrix.diagonal_apply, Equiv.sumAssoc_apply_inl_inl,
Matrix.reindexLieEquiv_apply, Matrix.submatrix_apply, Equiv.symm_symm, Matrix.reindex_apply,
Sum.elim_inl, if_true, eq_self_iff_true, Matrix.one_apply_eq, Matrix.fromBlocks_apply₁₁,
DMatrix.zero_apply, Equiv.sumAssoc_apply_inl_inr, if_false, Matrix.fromBlocks_apply₁₂,
Matrix.fromBlocks_apply₂₁, Matrix.fromBlocks_apply₂₂, Equiv.sumAssoc_apply_inr,
Sum.elim_inr, Sum.inl_injective.eq_iff, Sum.inr_injective.eq_iff, reduceCtorEq] <;>
congr 1
/-- An equivalence between two possible definitions of the classical Lie algebra of type B. -/
noncomputable def typeBEquivSo' [Invertible (2 : R)] : typeB l R ≃ₗ⁅R⁆ so' (Unit ⊕ l) l R := by
apply (skewAdjointMatricesLieSubalgebraEquiv (JB l R) (PB l R) (by infer_instance)).trans
symm
apply
(skewAdjointMatricesLieSubalgebraEquivTranspose (indefiniteDiagonal (Sum Unit l) l R)
(Matrix.reindexAlgEquiv _ _ (Equiv.sumAssoc PUnit l l))
(Matrix.transpose_reindex _ _)).trans
apply LieEquiv.ofEq
ext A
rw [jb_transform, ← val_unitOfInvertible (2 : R), ← Units.smul_def, LieSubalgebra.mem_coe,
LieSubalgebra.mem_coe, mem_skewAdjointMatricesLieSubalgebra_unit_smul]
simp [indefiniteDiagonal_assoc, S]
end Orthogonal
end LieAlgebra
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/Classical.lean | 356 | 368 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Option
import Mathlib.Analysis.BoxIntegral.Box.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pairwise.Lattice
/-!
# Partitions of rectangular boxes in `ℝⁿ`
In this file we define (pre)partitions of rectangular boxes in `ℝⁿ`. A partition of a box `I` in
`ℝⁿ` (see `BoxIntegral.Prepartition` and `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.IsPartition`) is a finite set
of pairwise disjoint boxes such that their union is exactly `I`. We use `boxes : Finset (Box ι)` to
store the set of boxes.
Many lemmas about box integrals deal with pairwise disjoint collections of subboxes, so we define a
structure `BoxIntegral.Prepartition (I : BoxIntegral.Box ι)` that stores a collection of boxes
such that
* each box `J ∈ boxes` is a subbox of `I`;
* the boxes are pairwise disjoint as sets in `ℝⁿ`.
Then we define a predicate `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.IsPartition`; `π.IsPartition` means that the
boxes of `π` actually cover the whole `I`. We also define some operations on prepartitions:
* `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.biUnion`: split each box of a partition into smaller boxes;
* `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.restrict`: restrict a partition to a smaller box.
We also define a `SemilatticeInf` structure on `BoxIntegral.Prepartition I` for all
`I : BoxIntegral.Box ι`.
## Tags
rectangular box, partition
-/
open Set Finset Function
open scoped NNReal
noncomputable section
namespace BoxIntegral
variable {ι : Type*}
/-- A prepartition of `I : BoxIntegral.Box ι` is a finite set of pairwise disjoint subboxes of
`I`. -/
structure Prepartition (I : Box ι) where
/-- The underlying set of boxes -/
boxes : Finset (Box ι)
/-- Each box is a sub-box of `I` -/
le_of_mem' : ∀ J ∈ boxes, J ≤ I
/-- The boxes in a prepartition are pairwise disjoint. -/
pairwiseDisjoint : Set.Pairwise (↑boxes) (Disjoint on ((↑) : Box ι → Set (ι → ℝ)))
namespace Prepartition
variable {I J J₁ J₂ : Box ι} (π : Prepartition I) {π₁ π₂ : Prepartition I} {x : ι → ℝ}
instance : Membership (Box ι) (Prepartition I) :=
⟨fun π J => J ∈ π.boxes⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_boxes : J ∈ π.boxes ↔ J ∈ π := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk {s h₁ h₂} : J ∈ (mk s h₁ h₂ : Prepartition I) ↔ J ∈ s := Iff.rfl
theorem disjoint_coe_of_mem (h₁ : J₁ ∈ π) (h₂ : J₂ ∈ π) (h : J₁ ≠ J₂) :
Disjoint (J₁ : Set (ι → ℝ)) J₂ :=
π.pairwiseDisjoint h₁ h₂ h
theorem eq_of_mem_of_mem (h₁ : J₁ ∈ π) (h₂ : J₂ ∈ π) (hx₁ : x ∈ J₁) (hx₂ : x ∈ J₂) : J₁ = J₂ :=
by_contra fun H => (π.disjoint_coe_of_mem h₁ h₂ H).le_bot ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
theorem eq_of_le_of_le (h₁ : J₁ ∈ π) (h₂ : J₂ ∈ π) (hle₁ : J ≤ J₁) (hle₂ : J ≤ J₂) : J₁ = J₂ :=
π.eq_of_mem_of_mem h₁ h₂ (hle₁ J.upper_mem) (hle₂ J.upper_mem)
theorem eq_of_le (h₁ : J₁ ∈ π) (h₂ : J₂ ∈ π) (hle : J₁ ≤ J₂) : J₁ = J₂ :=
π.eq_of_le_of_le h₁ h₂ le_rfl hle
theorem le_of_mem (hJ : J ∈ π) : J ≤ I :=
π.le_of_mem' J hJ
theorem lower_le_lower (hJ : J ∈ π) : I.lower ≤ J.lower :=
Box.antitone_lower (π.le_of_mem hJ)
theorem upper_le_upper (hJ : J ∈ π) : J.upper ≤ I.upper :=
Box.monotone_upper (π.le_of_mem hJ)
theorem injective_boxes : Function.Injective (boxes : Prepartition I → Finset (Box ι)) := by
rintro ⟨s₁, h₁, h₁'⟩ ⟨s₂, h₂, h₂'⟩ (rfl : s₁ = s₂)
rfl
@[ext]
theorem ext (h : ∀ J, J ∈ π₁ ↔ J ∈ π₂) : π₁ = π₂ :=
injective_boxes <| Finset.ext h
/-- The singleton prepartition `{J}`, `J ≤ I`. -/
@[simps]
def single (I J : Box ι) (h : J ≤ I) : Prepartition I :=
⟨{J}, by simpa, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_single {J'} (h : J ≤ I) : J' ∈ single I J h ↔ J' = J :=
mem_singleton
/-- We say that `π ≤ π'` if each box of `π` is a subbox of some box of `π'`. -/
instance : LE (Prepartition I) :=
⟨fun π π' => ∀ ⦃I⦄, I ∈ π → ∃ I' ∈ π', I ≤ I'⟩
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder (Prepartition I) where
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl _ I hI := ⟨I, hI, le_rfl⟩
le_trans _ _ _ h₁₂ h₂₃ _ hI₁ :=
let ⟨_, hI₂, hI₁₂⟩ := h₁₂ hI₁
let ⟨I₃, hI₃, hI₂₃⟩ := h₂₃ hI₂
⟨I₃, hI₃, hI₁₂.trans hI₂₃⟩
le_antisymm := by
suffices ∀ {π₁ π₂ : Prepartition I}, π₁ ≤ π₂ → π₂ ≤ π₁ → π₁.boxes ⊆ π₂.boxes from
fun π₁ π₂ h₁ h₂ => injective_boxes (Subset.antisymm (this h₁ h₂) (this h₂ h₁))
intro π₁ π₂ h₁ h₂ J hJ
rcases h₁ hJ with ⟨J', hJ', hle⟩; rcases h₂ hJ' with ⟨J'', hJ'', hle'⟩
obtain rfl : J = J'' := π₁.eq_of_le hJ hJ'' (hle.trans hle')
obtain rfl : J' = J := le_antisymm ‹_› ‹_›
assumption
instance : OrderTop (Prepartition I) where
top := single I I le_rfl
le_top π _ hJ := ⟨I, by simp, π.le_of_mem hJ⟩
instance : OrderBot (Prepartition I) where
bot := ⟨∅,
fun _ hJ => (Finset.not_mem_empty _ hJ).elim,
fun _ hJ => (Set.not_mem_empty _ <| Finset.coe_empty ▸ hJ).elim⟩
bot_le _ _ hJ := (Finset.not_mem_empty _ hJ).elim
instance : Inhabited (Prepartition I) := ⟨⊤⟩
theorem le_def : π₁ ≤ π₂ ↔ ∀ J ∈ π₁, ∃ J' ∈ π₂, J ≤ J' := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_top : J ∈ (⊤ : Prepartition I) ↔ J = I :=
mem_singleton
@[simp]
theorem top_boxes : (⊤ : Prepartition I).boxes = {I} := rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_bot : J ∉ (⊥ : Prepartition I) :=
Finset.not_mem_empty _
@[simp]
theorem bot_boxes : (⊥ : Prepartition I).boxes = ∅ := rfl
/-- An auxiliary lemma used to prove that the same point can't belong to more than
`2 ^ Fintype.card ι` closed boxes of a prepartition. -/
theorem injOn_setOf_mem_Icc_setOf_lower_eq (x : ι → ℝ) :
InjOn (fun J : Box ι => { i | J.lower i = x i }) { J | J ∈ π ∧ x ∈ Box.Icc J } := by
rintro J₁ ⟨h₁, hx₁⟩ J₂ ⟨h₂, hx₂⟩ (H : { i | J₁.lower i = x i } = { i | J₂.lower i = x i })
suffices ∀ i, (Ioc (J₁.lower i) (J₁.upper i) ∩ Ioc (J₂.lower i) (J₂.upper i)).Nonempty by
choose y hy₁ hy₂ using this
exact π.eq_of_mem_of_mem h₁ h₂ hy₁ hy₂
intro i
simp only [Set.ext_iff, mem_setOf] at H
rcases (hx₁.1 i).eq_or_lt with hi₁ | hi₁
· have hi₂ : J₂.lower i = x i := (H _).1 hi₁
have H₁ : x i < J₁.upper i := by simpa only [hi₁] using J₁.lower_lt_upper i
have H₂ : x i < J₂.upper i := by simpa only [hi₂] using J₂.lower_lt_upper i
rw [Set.Ioc_inter_Ioc, hi₁, hi₂, sup_idem, Set.nonempty_Ioc]
exact lt_min H₁ H₂
· have hi₂ : J₂.lower i < x i := (hx₂.1 i).lt_of_ne (mt (H _).2 hi₁.ne)
exact ⟨x i, ⟨hi₁, hx₁.2 i⟩, ⟨hi₂, hx₂.2 i⟩⟩
open scoped Classical in
/-- The set of boxes of a prepartition that contain `x` in their closures has cardinality
at most `2 ^ Fintype.card ι`. -/
theorem card_filter_mem_Icc_le [Fintype ι] (x : ι → ℝ) :
#{J ∈ π.boxes | x ∈ Box.Icc J} ≤ 2 ^ Fintype.card ι := by
rw [← Fintype.card_set]
refine Finset.card_le_card_of_injOn (fun J : Box ι => { i | J.lower i = x i })
(fun _ _ => Finset.mem_univ _) ?_
simpa using π.injOn_setOf_mem_Icc_setOf_lower_eq x
/-- Given a prepartition `π : BoxIntegral.Prepartition I`, `π.iUnion` is the part of `I` covered by
the boxes of `π`. -/
protected def iUnion : Set (ι → ℝ) :=
⋃ J ∈ π, ↑J
theorem iUnion_def : π.iUnion = ⋃ J ∈ π, ↑J := rfl
theorem iUnion_def' : π.iUnion = ⋃ J ∈ π.boxes, ↑J := rfl
-- Porting note: Previous proof was `:= Set.mem_iUnion₂`
@[simp]
theorem mem_iUnion : x ∈ π.iUnion ↔ ∃ J ∈ π, x ∈ J := by
convert Set.mem_iUnion₂
rw [Box.mem_coe, exists_prop]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_single (h : J ≤ I) : (single I J h).iUnion = J := by simp [iUnion_def]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_top : (⊤ : Prepartition I).iUnion = I := by simp [Prepartition.iUnion]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_eq_empty : π₁.iUnion = ∅ ↔ π₁ = ⊥ := by
simp [← injective_boxes.eq_iff, Finset.ext_iff, Prepartition.iUnion, imp_false]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_bot : (⊥ : Prepartition I).iUnion = ∅ :=
iUnion_eq_empty.2 rfl
theorem subset_iUnion (h : J ∈ π) : ↑J ⊆ π.iUnion :=
subset_biUnion_of_mem h
theorem iUnion_subset : π.iUnion ⊆ I :=
iUnion₂_subset π.le_of_mem'
@[mono]
theorem iUnion_mono (h : π₁ ≤ π₂) : π₁.iUnion ⊆ π₂.iUnion := fun _ hx =>
let ⟨_, hJ₁, hx⟩ := π₁.mem_iUnion.1 hx
let ⟨J₂, hJ₂, hle⟩ := h hJ₁
π₂.mem_iUnion.2 ⟨J₂, hJ₂, hle hx⟩
theorem disjoint_boxes_of_disjoint_iUnion (h : Disjoint π₁.iUnion π₂.iUnion) :
Disjoint π₁.boxes π₂.boxes :=
Finset.disjoint_left.2 fun J h₁ h₂ =>
Disjoint.le_bot (h.mono (π₁.subset_iUnion h₁) (π₂.subset_iUnion h₂)) ⟨J.upper_mem, J.upper_mem⟩
theorem le_iff_nonempty_imp_le_and_iUnion_subset :
π₁ ≤ π₂ ↔
(∀ J ∈ π₁, ∀ J' ∈ π₂, (J ∩ J' : Set (ι → ℝ)).Nonempty → J ≤ J') ∧ π₁.iUnion ⊆ π₂.iUnion := by
constructor
· refine fun H => ⟨fun J hJ J' hJ' Hne => ?_, iUnion_mono H⟩
rcases H hJ with ⟨J'', hJ'', Hle⟩
rcases Hne with ⟨x, hx, hx'⟩
rwa [π₂.eq_of_mem_of_mem hJ' hJ'' hx' (Hle hx)]
· rintro ⟨H, HU⟩ J hJ
simp only [Set.subset_def, mem_iUnion] at HU
rcases HU J.upper ⟨J, hJ, J.upper_mem⟩ with ⟨J₂, hJ₂, hx⟩
exact ⟨J₂, hJ₂, H _ hJ _ hJ₂ ⟨_, J.upper_mem, hx⟩⟩
theorem eq_of_boxes_subset_iUnion_superset (h₁ : π₁.boxes ⊆ π₂.boxes) (h₂ : π₂.iUnion ⊆ π₁.iUnion) :
π₁ = π₂ :=
le_antisymm (fun J hJ => ⟨J, h₁ hJ, le_rfl⟩) <|
le_iff_nonempty_imp_le_and_iUnion_subset.2
⟨fun _ hJ₁ _ hJ₂ Hne =>
(π₂.eq_of_mem_of_mem hJ₁ (h₁ hJ₂) Hne.choose_spec.1 Hne.choose_spec.2).le, h₂⟩
open scoped Classical in
/-- Given a prepartition `π` of a box `I` and a collection of prepartitions `πi J` of all boxes
`J ∈ π`, returns the prepartition of `I` into the union of the boxes of all `πi J`.
Though we only use the values of `πi` on the boxes of `π`, we require `πi` to be a globally defined
function. -/
@[simps]
def biUnion (πi : ∀ J : Box ι, Prepartition J) : Prepartition I where
boxes := π.boxes.biUnion fun J => (πi J).boxes
le_of_mem' J hJ := by
simp only [Finset.mem_biUnion, exists_prop, mem_boxes] at hJ
rcases hJ with ⟨J', hJ', hJ⟩
exact ((πi J').le_of_mem hJ).trans (π.le_of_mem hJ')
pairwiseDisjoint := by
simp only [Set.Pairwise, Finset.mem_coe, Finset.mem_biUnion]
rintro J₁' ⟨J₁, hJ₁, hJ₁'⟩ J₂' ⟨J₂, hJ₂, hJ₂'⟩ Hne
rw [Function.onFun, Set.disjoint_left]
rintro x hx₁ hx₂; apply Hne
obtain rfl : J₁ = J₂ :=
π.eq_of_mem_of_mem hJ₁ hJ₂ ((πi J₁).le_of_mem hJ₁' hx₁) ((πi J₂).le_of_mem hJ₂' hx₂)
exact (πi J₁).eq_of_mem_of_mem hJ₁' hJ₂' hx₁ hx₂
variable {πi πi₁ πi₂ : ∀ J : Box ι, Prepartition J}
@[simp]
theorem mem_biUnion : J ∈ π.biUnion πi ↔ ∃ J' ∈ π, J ∈ πi J' := by simp [biUnion]
theorem biUnion_le (πi : ∀ J, Prepartition J) : π.biUnion πi ≤ π := fun _ hJ =>
let ⟨J', hJ', hJ⟩ := π.mem_biUnion.1 hJ
⟨J', hJ', (πi J').le_of_mem hJ⟩
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_top : (π.biUnion fun _ => ⊤) = π := by
ext
simp
@[congr]
theorem biUnion_congr (h : π₁ = π₂) (hi : ∀ J ∈ π₁, πi₁ J = πi₂ J) :
π₁.biUnion πi₁ = π₂.biUnion πi₂ := by
subst π₂
ext J
simp only [mem_biUnion]
constructor <;> exact fun ⟨J', h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨J', h₁, hi J' h₁ ▸ h₂⟩
theorem biUnion_congr_of_le (h : π₁ = π₂) (hi : ∀ J ≤ I, πi₁ J = πi₂ J) :
π₁.biUnion πi₁ = π₂.biUnion πi₂ :=
biUnion_congr h fun J hJ => hi J (π₁.le_of_mem hJ)
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_biUnion (πi : ∀ J : Box ι, Prepartition J) :
(π.biUnion πi).iUnion = ⋃ J ∈ π, (πi J).iUnion := by simp [Prepartition.iUnion]
open scoped Classical in
@[simp]
theorem sum_biUnion_boxes {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] (π : Prepartition I)
(πi : ∀ J, Prepartition J) (f : Box ι → M) :
(∑ J ∈ π.boxes.biUnion fun J => (πi J).boxes, f J) =
∑ J ∈ π.boxes, ∑ J' ∈ (πi J).boxes, f J' := by
refine Finset.sum_biUnion fun J₁ h₁ J₂ h₂ hne => Finset.disjoint_left.2 fun J' h₁' h₂' => ?_
exact hne (π.eq_of_le_of_le h₁ h₂ ((πi J₁).le_of_mem h₁') ((πi J₂).le_of_mem h₂'))
open scoped Classical in
/-- Given a box `J ∈ π.biUnion πi`, returns the box `J' ∈ π` such that `J ∈ πi J'`.
For `J ∉ π.biUnion πi`, returns `I`. -/
def biUnionIndex (πi : ∀ (J : Box ι), Prepartition J) (J : Box ι) : Box ι :=
if hJ : J ∈ π.biUnion πi then (π.mem_biUnion.1 hJ).choose else I
theorem biUnionIndex_mem (hJ : J ∈ π.biUnion πi) : π.biUnionIndex πi J ∈ π := by
rw [biUnionIndex, dif_pos hJ]
exact (π.mem_biUnion.1 hJ).choose_spec.1
theorem biUnionIndex_le (πi : ∀ J, Prepartition J) (J : Box ι) : π.biUnionIndex πi J ≤ I := by
by_cases hJ : J ∈ π.biUnion πi
· exact π.le_of_mem (π.biUnionIndex_mem hJ)
· rw [biUnionIndex, dif_neg hJ]
theorem mem_biUnionIndex (hJ : J ∈ π.biUnion πi) : J ∈ πi (π.biUnionIndex πi J) := by
convert (π.mem_biUnion.1 hJ).choose_spec.2 <;> exact dif_pos hJ
theorem le_biUnionIndex (hJ : J ∈ π.biUnion πi) : J ≤ π.biUnionIndex πi J :=
le_of_mem _ (π.mem_biUnionIndex hJ)
/-- Uniqueness property of `BoxIntegral.Prepartition.biUnionIndex`. -/
theorem biUnionIndex_of_mem (hJ : J ∈ π) {J'} (hJ' : J' ∈ πi J) : π.biUnionIndex πi J' = J :=
have : J' ∈ π.biUnion πi := π.mem_biUnion.2 ⟨J, hJ, hJ'⟩
π.eq_of_le_of_le (π.biUnionIndex_mem this) hJ (π.le_biUnionIndex this) (le_of_mem _ hJ')
theorem biUnion_assoc (πi : ∀ J, Prepartition J) (πi' : Box ι → ∀ J : Box ι, Prepartition J) :
(π.biUnion fun J => (πi J).biUnion (πi' J)) =
(π.biUnion πi).biUnion fun J => πi' (π.biUnionIndex πi J) J := by
ext J
simp only [mem_biUnion, exists_prop]
constructor
| · rintro ⟨J₁, hJ₁, J₂, hJ₂, hJ⟩
refine ⟨J₂, ⟨J₁, hJ₁, hJ₂⟩, ?_⟩
| Mathlib/Analysis/BoxIntegral/Partition/Basic.lean | 346 | 347 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Sqrt
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Sqrt
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Algebraic.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
/-!
# Irrational real numbers
In this file we define a predicate `Irrational` on `ℝ`, prove that the `n`-th root of an integer
number is irrational if it is not integer, and that `√(q : ℚ)` is irrational if and only if
`¬IsSquare q ∧ 0 ≤ q`.
We also provide dot-style constructors like `Irrational.add_rat`, `Irrational.rat_sub` etc.
With the `Decidable` instances in this file, is possible to prove `Irrational √n` using `decide`,
when `n` is a numeric literal or cast;
but this only works if you `unseal Nat.sqrt.iter in` before the theorem where you use this proof.
-/
open Rat Real
/-- A real number is irrational if it is not equal to any rational number. -/
def Irrational (x : ℝ) :=
x ∉ Set.range ((↑) : ℚ → ℝ)
theorem irrational_iff_ne_rational (x : ℝ) : Irrational x ↔ ∀ a b : ℤ, x ≠ a / b := by
simp only [Irrational, Rat.forall, cast_mk, not_exists, Set.mem_range, cast_intCast, cast_div,
eq_comm]
/-- A transcendental real number is irrational. -/
theorem Transcendental.irrational {r : ℝ} (tr : Transcendental ℚ r) : Irrational r := by
rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩
exact tr (isAlgebraic_algebraMap a)
/-!
### Irrationality of roots of integer and rational numbers
-/
/-- If `x^n`, `n > 0`, is integer and is not the `n`-th power of an integer, then
`x` is irrational. -/
theorem irrational_nrt_of_notint_nrt {x : ℝ} (n : ℕ) (m : ℤ) (hxr : x ^ n = m)
(hv : ¬∃ y : ℤ, x = y) (hnpos : 0 < n) : Irrational x := by
rintro ⟨⟨N, D, P, C⟩, rfl⟩
rw [← cast_pow] at hxr
have c1 : ((D : ℤ) : ℝ) ≠ 0 := by
rw [Int.cast_ne_zero, Int.natCast_ne_zero]
exact P
have c2 : ((D : ℤ) : ℝ) ^ n ≠ 0 := pow_ne_zero _ c1
rw [mk'_eq_divInt, cast_pow, cast_mk, div_pow, div_eq_iff_mul_eq c2, ← Int.cast_pow,
← Int.cast_pow, ← Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_inj] at hxr
have hdivn : (D : ℤ) ^ n ∣ N ^ n := Dvd.intro_left m hxr
rw [← Int.dvd_natAbs, ← Int.natCast_pow, Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, Int.natAbs_pow,
Nat.pow_dvd_pow_iff hnpos.ne'] at hdivn
obtain rfl : D = 1 := by rw [← Nat.gcd_eq_right hdivn, C.gcd_eq_one]
refine hv ⟨N, ?_⟩
rw [mk'_eq_divInt, Int.ofNat_one, divInt_one, cast_intCast]
/-- If `x^n = m` is an integer and `n` does not divide the `multiplicity p m`, then `x`
is irrational. -/
theorem irrational_nrt_of_n_not_dvd_multiplicity {x : ℝ} (n : ℕ) {m : ℤ} (hm : m ≠ 0) (p : ℕ)
[hp : Fact p.Prime] (hxr : x ^ n = m)
(hv : multiplicity (p : ℤ) m % n ≠ 0) :
Irrational x := by
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos n with (rfl | hnpos)
· rw [eq_comm, pow_zero, ← Int.cast_one, Int.cast_inj] at hxr
simp [hxr, multiplicity_of_one_right (mt isUnit_iff_dvd_one.1
(mt Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.1 hp.1.not_dvd_one)), Nat.zero_mod] at hv
refine irrational_nrt_of_notint_nrt _ _ hxr ?_ hnpos
rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
rw [← Int.cast_pow, Int.cast_inj] at hxr
subst m
have : y ≠ 0 := by rintro rfl; rw [zero_pow hnpos.ne'] at hm; exact hm rfl
rw [(Int.finiteMultiplicity_iff.2 ⟨by simp [hp.1.ne_one], this⟩).multiplicity_pow
(Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.1), Nat.mul_mod_right] at hv
exact hv rfl
theorem irrational_sqrt_of_multiplicity_odd (m : ℤ) (hm : 0 < m) (p : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime]
(Hpv : multiplicity (p : ℤ) m % 2 = 1) :
Irrational (√m) :=
@irrational_nrt_of_n_not_dvd_multiplicity _ 2 _ (Ne.symm (ne_of_lt hm)) p hp
(sq_sqrt (Int.cast_nonneg.2 <| le_of_lt hm)) (by rw [Hpv]; exact one_ne_zero)
@[simp] theorem not_irrational_zero : ¬Irrational 0 := not_not_intro ⟨0, Rat.cast_zero⟩
@[simp] theorem not_irrational_one : ¬Irrational 1 := not_not_intro ⟨1, Rat.cast_one⟩
theorem irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff_of_nonneg {q : ℚ} (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
Irrational (√q) ↔ ¬IsSquare q := by
refine Iff.not (?_ : Exists _ ↔ Exists _)
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
refine ⟨y, Rat.cast_injective (α := ℝ) ?_⟩
rw [Rat.cast_mul, hy, mul_self_sqrt (Rat.cast_nonneg.2 hq)]
· rintro ⟨q', rfl⟩
exact ⟨|q'|, mod_cast (sqrt_mul_self_eq_abs q').symm⟩
theorem irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff {q : ℚ} :
Irrational (√q) ↔ ¬IsSquare q ∧ 0 ≤ q := by
obtain hq | hq := le_or_lt 0 q
· simp_rw [irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff_of_nonneg hq, and_iff_left hq]
· rw [sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos (Rat.cast_nonpos.2 hq.le)]
simp_rw [not_irrational_zero, false_iff, not_and, not_le, hq, implies_true]
theorem irrational_sqrt_intCast_iff_of_nonneg {z : ℤ} (hz : 0 ≤ z) :
Irrational (√z) ↔ ¬IsSquare z := by
rw [← Rat.isSquare_intCast_iff, ← irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff_of_nonneg (mod_cast hz),
Rat.cast_intCast]
theorem irrational_sqrt_intCast_iff {z : ℤ} :
Irrational (√z) ↔ ¬IsSquare z ∧ 0 ≤ z := by
rw [← Rat.cast_intCast, irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff, Rat.isSquare_intCast_iff, Int.cast_nonneg]
theorem irrational_sqrt_natCast_iff {n : ℕ} : Irrational (√n) ↔ ¬IsSquare n := by
rw [← Rat.isSquare_natCast_iff, ← irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg,
Rat.cast_natCast]
theorem irrational_sqrt_ofNat_iff {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
Irrational √(ofNat(n)) ↔ ¬IsSquare ofNat(n) :=
irrational_sqrt_natCast_iff
theorem Nat.Prime.irrational_sqrt {p : ℕ} (hp : Nat.Prime p) : Irrational (√p) :=
irrational_sqrt_natCast_iff.mpr hp.not_isSquare
/-- **Irrationality of the Square Root of 2** -/
theorem irrational_sqrt_two : Irrational (√2) := by
simpa using Nat.prime_two.irrational_sqrt
/--
This can be used as
```lean
unseal Nat.sqrt.iter in
example : Irrational √24 := by decide
```
-/
instance {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] : Decidable (Irrational √(ofNat(n))) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ irrational_sqrt_ofNat_iff
instance (n : ℕ) : Decidable (Irrational (√n)) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ irrational_sqrt_natCast_iff
instance (z : ℤ) : Decidable (Irrational (√z)) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ irrational_sqrt_intCast_iff
instance (q : ℚ) : Decidable (Irrational (√q)) :=
decidable_of_iff' _ irrational_sqrt_ratCast_iff
/-!
### Dot-style operations on `Irrational`
#### Coercion of a rational/integer/natural number is not irrational
-/
namespace Irrational
variable {x : ℝ}
/-!
#### Irrational number is not equal to a rational/integer/natural number
-/
theorem ne_rat (h : Irrational x) (q : ℚ) : x ≠ q := fun hq => h ⟨q, hq.symm⟩
theorem ne_int (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : x ≠ m := by
rw [← Rat.cast_intCast]
exact h.ne_rat _
theorem ne_nat (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : x ≠ m :=
h.ne_int m
theorem ne_zero (h : Irrational x) : x ≠ 0 := mod_cast h.ne_nat 0
theorem ne_one (h : Irrational x) : x ≠ 1 := by simpa only [Nat.cast_one] using h.ne_nat 1
@[simp] theorem ne_ofNat (h : Irrational x) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : x ≠ ofNat(n) :=
h.ne_nat n
end Irrational
@[simp]
theorem Rat.not_irrational (q : ℚ) : ¬Irrational q := fun h => h ⟨q, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem Int.not_irrational (m : ℤ) : ¬Irrational m := fun h => h.ne_int m rfl
@[simp]
theorem Nat.not_irrational (m : ℕ) : ¬Irrational m := fun h => h.ne_nat m rfl
@[simp] theorem not_irrational_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ¬Irrational ofNat(n) :=
n.not_irrational
namespace Irrational
variable (q : ℚ) {x y : ℝ}
/-!
#### Addition of rational/integer/natural numbers
-/
/-- If `x + y` is irrational, then at least one of `x` and `y` is irrational. -/
theorem add_cases : Irrational (x + y) → Irrational x ∨ Irrational y := by
delta Irrational
contrapose!
rintro ⟨⟨rx, rfl⟩, ⟨ry, rfl⟩⟩
exact ⟨rx + ry, cast_add rx ry⟩
theorem of_ratCast_add (h : Irrational (q + x)) : Irrational x :=
h.add_cases.resolve_left q.not_irrational
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_rat_add := of_ratCast_add
theorem ratCast_add (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (q + x) :=
of_ratCast_add (-q) <| by rwa [cast_neg, neg_add_cancel_left]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias rat_add := ratCast_add
theorem of_add_ratCast : Irrational (x + q) → Irrational x :=
add_comm (↑q) x ▸ of_ratCast_add q
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_add_rat := of_add_ratCast
theorem add_ratCast (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (x + q) :=
add_comm (↑q) x ▸ h.ratCast_add q
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias add_rat := add_ratCast
theorem of_intCast_add (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (m + x)) : Irrational x := by
rw [← cast_intCast] at h
exact h.of_ratCast_add m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_int_add := of_intCast_add
theorem of_add_intCast (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (x + m)) : Irrational x :=
of_intCast_add m <| add_comm x m ▸ h
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_add_int := of_add_intCast
theorem intCast_add (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : Irrational (m + x) := by
rw [← cast_intCast]
exact h.ratCast_add m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias int_add := intCast_add
theorem add_intCast (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : Irrational (x + m) :=
add_comm (↑m) x ▸ h.intCast_add m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias add_int := add_intCast
theorem of_natCast_add (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (m + x)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_intCast_add m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_nat_add := of_natCast_add
theorem of_add_natCast (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (x + m)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_add_intCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_add_nat := of_add_natCast
theorem natCast_add (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : Irrational (m + x) :=
h.intCast_add m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias nat_add := natCast_add
theorem add_natCast (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : Irrational (x + m) :=
h.add_intCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias add_nat := add_natCast
/-!
#### Negation
-/
theorem of_neg (h : Irrational (-x)) : Irrational x := fun ⟨q, hx⟩ => h ⟨-q, by rw [cast_neg, hx]⟩
protected theorem neg (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (-x) :=
of_neg <| by rwa [neg_neg]
/-!
#### Subtraction of rational/integer/natural numbers
-/
theorem sub_ratCast (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (x - q) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg, cast_neg] using h.add_ratCast (-q)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias sub_rat := sub_ratCast
theorem ratCast_sub (h : Irrational x) : Irrational (q - x) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h.neg.ratCast_add q
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias rat_sub := ratCast_sub
theorem of_sub_ratCast (h : Irrational (x - q)) : Irrational x :=
of_add_ratCast (-q) <| by simpa only [cast_neg, sub_eq_add_neg] using h
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_sub_rat := of_sub_ratCast
theorem of_ratCast_sub (h : Irrational (q - x)) : Irrational x :=
of_neg (of_ratCast_add q (by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h))
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_rat_sub := of_ratCast_sub
theorem sub_intCast (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : Irrational (x - m) := by
simpa only [Rat.cast_intCast] using h.sub_ratCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias sub_int := sub_intCast
theorem intCast_sub (h : Irrational x) (m : ℤ) : Irrational (m - x) := by
simpa only [Rat.cast_intCast] using h.ratCast_sub m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias int_sub := intCast_sub
theorem of_sub_intCast (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (x - m)) : Irrational x :=
of_sub_ratCast m <| by rwa [Rat.cast_intCast]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_sub_int := of_sub_intCast
theorem of_intCast_sub (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (m - x)) : Irrational x :=
of_ratCast_sub m <| by rwa [Rat.cast_intCast]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_int_sub := of_intCast_sub
theorem sub_natCast (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : Irrational (x - m) :=
h.sub_intCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias sub_nat := sub_natCast
theorem natCast_sub (h : Irrational x) (m : ℕ) : Irrational (m - x) :=
h.intCast_sub m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias nat_sub := natCast_sub
theorem of_sub_natCast (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (x - m)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_sub_intCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_sub_nat := of_sub_natCast
theorem of_natCast_sub (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (m - x)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_intCast_sub m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_nat_sub := of_natCast_sub
/-!
#### Multiplication by rational numbers
-/
theorem mul_cases : Irrational (x * y) → Irrational x ∨ Irrational y := by
delta Irrational
contrapose!
rintro ⟨⟨rx, rfl⟩, ⟨ry, rfl⟩⟩
exact ⟨rx * ry, cast_mul rx ry⟩
theorem of_mul_ratCast (h : Irrational (x * q)) : Irrational x :=
h.mul_cases.resolve_right q.not_irrational
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_mul_rat := of_mul_ratCast
theorem mul_ratCast (h : Irrational x) {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : Irrational (x * q) :=
of_mul_ratCast q⁻¹ <| by rwa [mul_assoc, ← cast_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ hq, cast_one, mul_one]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias mul_rat := mul_ratCast
theorem of_ratCast_mul : Irrational (q * x) → Irrational x :=
mul_comm x q ▸ of_mul_ratCast q
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_rat_mul := of_ratCast_mul
theorem ratCast_mul (h : Irrational x) {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : Irrational (q * x) :=
mul_comm x q ▸ h.mul_ratCast hq
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias rat_mul := ratCast_mul
theorem of_mul_intCast (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (x * m)) : Irrational x :=
of_mul_ratCast m <| by rwa [cast_intCast]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_mul_int := of_mul_intCast
theorem of_intCast_mul (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (m * x)) : Irrational x :=
of_ratCast_mul m <| by rwa [cast_intCast]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_int_mul := of_intCast_mul
theorem mul_intCast (h : Irrational x) {m : ℤ} (hm : m ≠ 0) : Irrational (x * m) := by
rw [← cast_intCast]
refine h.mul_ratCast ?_
rwa [Int.cast_ne_zero]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias mul_int := mul_intCast
theorem intCast_mul (h : Irrational x) {m : ℤ} (hm : m ≠ 0) : Irrational (m * x) :=
mul_comm x m ▸ h.mul_intCast hm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias int_mul := intCast_mul
theorem of_mul_natCast (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (x * m)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_mul_intCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_mul_nat := of_mul_natCast
theorem of_natCast_mul (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (m * x)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_intCast_mul m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_nat_mul := of_natCast_mul
theorem mul_natCast (h : Irrational x) {m : ℕ} (hm : m ≠ 0) : Irrational (x * m) :=
h.mul_intCast <| Int.natCast_ne_zero.2 hm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias mul_nat := mul_natCast
theorem natCast_mul (h : Irrational x) {m : ℕ} (hm : m ≠ 0) : Irrational (m * x) :=
h.intCast_mul <| Int.natCast_ne_zero.2 hm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias nat_mul := natCast_mul
/-!
#### Inverse
-/
theorem of_inv (h : Irrational x⁻¹) : Irrational x := fun ⟨q, hq⟩ => h <| hq ▸ ⟨q⁻¹, q.cast_inv⟩
protected theorem inv (h : Irrational x) : Irrational x⁻¹ :=
of_inv <| by rwa [inv_inv]
/-!
#### Division
-/
theorem div_cases (h : Irrational (x / y)) : Irrational x ∨ Irrational y :=
h.mul_cases.imp id of_inv
theorem of_ratCast_div (h : Irrational (q / x)) : Irrational x :=
(h.of_ratCast_mul q).of_inv
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_rat_div := of_ratCast_div
theorem of_div_ratCast (h : Irrational (x / q)) : Irrational x :=
h.div_cases.resolve_right q.not_irrational
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_div_rat := of_div_ratCast
theorem ratCast_div (h : Irrational x) {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : Irrational (q / x) :=
h.inv.ratCast_mul hq
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias rat_div := ratCast_div
theorem div_ratCast (h : Irrational x) {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : Irrational (x / q) := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ← cast_inv]
exact h.mul_ratCast (inv_ne_zero hq)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias div_rat := div_ratCast
theorem of_intCast_div (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (m / x)) : Irrational x :=
h.div_cases.resolve_left m.not_irrational
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_int_div := of_intCast_div
theorem of_div_intCast (m : ℤ) (h : Irrational (x / m)) : Irrational x :=
h.div_cases.resolve_right m.not_irrational
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_div_int := of_div_intCast
theorem intCast_div (h : Irrational x) {m : ℤ} (hm : m ≠ 0) : Irrational (m / x) :=
h.inv.intCast_mul hm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias int_div := intCast_div
theorem div_intCast (h : Irrational x) {m : ℤ} (hm : m ≠ 0) : Irrational (x / m) := by
rw [← cast_intCast]
refine h.div_ratCast ?_
rwa [Int.cast_ne_zero]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias div_int := div_intCast
theorem of_natCast_div (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (m / x)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_intCast_div m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_nat_div := of_natCast_div
theorem of_div_natCast (m : ℕ) (h : Irrational (x / m)) : Irrational x :=
h.of_div_intCast m
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias of_div_nat := of_div_natCast
theorem natCast_div (h : Irrational x) {m : ℕ} (hm : m ≠ 0) : Irrational (m / x) :=
h.inv.natCast_mul hm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias nat_div := natCast_div
theorem div_natCast (h : Irrational x) {m : ℕ} (hm : m ≠ 0) : Irrational (x / m) :=
h.div_intCast <| by rwa [Int.natCast_ne_zero]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-01")] alias div_nat := div_natCast
theorem of_one_div (h : Irrational (1 / x)) : Irrational x :=
of_ratCast_div 1 <| by rwa [cast_one]
/-!
#### Natural and integer power
-/
theorem of_mul_self (h : Irrational (x * x)) : Irrational x :=
h.mul_cases.elim id id
theorem of_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, Irrational (x ^ n) → Irrational x
| 0 => fun h => by
rw [pow_zero] at h
exact (h ⟨1, cast_one⟩).elim
| n + 1 => fun h => by
rw [pow_succ] at h
exact h.mul_cases.elim (of_pow n) id
open Int in
theorem of_zpow : ∀ m : ℤ, Irrational (x ^ m) → Irrational x
| (n : ℕ) => fun h => by
rw [zpow_natCast] at h
exact h.of_pow _
| -[n+1] => fun h => by
rw [zpow_negSucc] at h
exact h.of_inv.of_pow _
end Irrational
section Polynomial
|
open Polynomial
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Irrational.lean | 491 | 492 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Alexander Bentkamp. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alexander Bentkamp, Mohanad Ahmed
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Spectrum
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.QuadraticForm.Basic
/-! # Positive Definite Matrices
This file defines positive (semi)definite matrices and connects the notion to positive definiteness
of quadratic forms. Most results require `𝕜 = ℝ` or `ℂ`.
## Main definitions
* `Matrix.PosDef` : a matrix `M : Matrix n n 𝕜` is positive definite if it is hermitian and `xᴴMx`
is greater than zero for all nonzero `x`.
* `Matrix.PosSemidef` : a matrix `M : Matrix n n 𝕜` is positive semidefinite if it is hermitian
and `xᴴMx` is nonnegative for all `x`.
## Main results
* `Matrix.posSemidef_iff_eq_transpose_mul_self` : a matrix `M : Matrix n n 𝕜` is positive
semidefinite iff it has the form `Bᴴ * B` for some `B`.
* `Matrix.PosSemidef.sqrt` : the unique positive semidefinite square root of a positive semidefinite
matrix. (See `Matrix.PosSemidef.eq_sqrt_of_sq_eq` for the proof of uniqueness.)
-/
open scoped ComplexOrder
namespace Matrix
variable {m n R 𝕜 : Type*}
variable [Fintype m] [Fintype n]
variable [CommRing R] [PartialOrder R] [StarRing R]
variable [RCLike 𝕜]
open scoped Matrix
/-!
## Positive semidefinite matrices
-/
/-- A matrix `M : Matrix n n R` is positive semidefinite if it is Hermitian and `xᴴ * M * x` is
nonnegative for all `x`. -/
def PosSemidef (M : Matrix n n R) :=
M.IsHermitian ∧ ∀ x : n → R, 0 ≤ dotProduct (star x) (M *ᵥ x)
protected theorem PosSemidef.diagonal [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n] {d : n → R} (h : 0 ≤ d) :
PosSemidef (diagonal d) :=
⟨isHermitian_diagonal_of_self_adjoint _ <| funext fun i => IsSelfAdjoint.of_nonneg (h i),
fun x => by
refine Fintype.sum_nonneg fun i => ?_
simpa only [mulVec_diagonal, ← mul_assoc] using conjugate_nonneg (h i) _⟩
/-- A diagonal matrix is positive semidefinite iff its diagonal entries are nonnegative. -/
lemma posSemidef_diagonal_iff [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n] {d : n → R} :
PosSemidef (diagonal d) ↔ (∀ i : n, 0 ≤ d i) :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hP⟩ i ↦ by simpa using hP (Pi.single i 1), .diagonal⟩
namespace PosSemidef
theorem isHermitian {M : Matrix n n R} (hM : M.PosSemidef) : M.IsHermitian :=
hM.1
theorem re_dotProduct_nonneg {M : Matrix n n 𝕜} (hM : M.PosSemidef) (x : n → 𝕜) :
0 ≤ RCLike.re (dotProduct (star x) (M *ᵥ x)) :=
RCLike.nonneg_iff.mp (hM.2 _) |>.1
lemma conjTranspose_mul_mul_same {A : Matrix n n R} (hA : PosSemidef A)
{m : Type*} [Fintype m] (B : Matrix n m R) :
PosSemidef (Bᴴ * A * B) := by
constructor
· exact isHermitian_conjTranspose_mul_mul B hA.1
· intro x
simpa only [star_mulVec, dotProduct_mulVec, vecMul_vecMul] using hA.2 (B *ᵥ x)
lemma mul_mul_conjTranspose_same {A : Matrix n n R} (hA : PosSemidef A)
{m : Type*} [Fintype m] (B : Matrix m n R) :
PosSemidef (B * A * Bᴴ) := by
simpa only [conjTranspose_conjTranspose] using hA.conjTranspose_mul_mul_same Bᴴ
theorem submatrix {M : Matrix n n R} (hM : M.PosSemidef) (e : m → n) :
(M.submatrix e e).PosSemidef := by
classical
rw [(by simp : M = 1 * M * 1), submatrix_mul (he₂ := Function.bijective_id),
submatrix_mul (he₂ := Function.bijective_id), submatrix_id_id]
simpa only [conjTranspose_submatrix, conjTranspose_one] using
conjTranspose_mul_mul_same hM (Matrix.submatrix 1 id e)
theorem transpose {M : Matrix n n R} (hM : M.PosSemidef) : Mᵀ.PosSemidef := by
refine ⟨IsHermitian.transpose hM.1, fun x => ?_⟩
convert hM.2 (star x) using 1
rw [mulVec_transpose, dotProduct_mulVec, star_star, dotProduct_comm]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Matrix.posSemidef_transpose_iff {M : Matrix n n R} : Mᵀ.PosSemidef ↔ M.PosSemidef :=
⟨(by simpa using ·.transpose), .transpose⟩
theorem conjTranspose {M : Matrix n n R} (hM : M.PosSemidef) : Mᴴ.PosSemidef := hM.1.symm ▸ hM
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Matrix.posSemidef_conjTranspose_iff {M : Matrix n n R} :
Mᴴ.PosSemidef ↔ M.PosSemidef :=
⟨(by simpa using ·.conjTranspose), .conjTranspose⟩
protected lemma zero : PosSemidef (0 : Matrix n n R) :=
⟨isHermitian_zero, by simp⟩
protected lemma one [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n] : PosSemidef (1 : Matrix n n R) :=
⟨isHermitian_one, fun x => by
rw [one_mulVec]; exact Fintype.sum_nonneg fun i => star_mul_self_nonneg _⟩
protected theorem natCast [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n] (d : ℕ) :
PosSemidef (d : Matrix n n R) :=
⟨isHermitian_natCast _, fun x => by
simp only [natCast_mulVec, dotProduct_smul]
rw [Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul]
exact nsmul_nonneg (dotProduct_star_self_nonneg _) _⟩
protected theorem ofNat [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n] (d : ℕ) [d.AtLeastTwo] :
PosSemidef (ofNat(d) : Matrix n n R) :=
.natCast d
protected theorem intCast [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n] (d : ℤ) (hd : 0 ≤ d) :
PosSemidef (d : Matrix n n R) :=
⟨isHermitian_intCast _, fun x => by
simp only [intCast_mulVec, dotProduct_smul]
rw [Int.cast_smul_eq_zsmul]
exact zsmul_nonneg (dotProduct_star_self_nonneg _) hd⟩
@[simp]
protected theorem _root_.Matrix.posSemidef_intCast_iff
[StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n] [Nonempty n] [Nontrivial R] (d : ℤ) :
PosSemidef (d : Matrix n n R) ↔ 0 ≤ d :=
posSemidef_diagonal_iff.trans <| by simp [Pi.le_def]
protected lemma pow [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n]
{M : Matrix n n R} (hM : M.PosSemidef) (k : ℕ) :
PosSemidef (M ^ k) :=
match k with
| 0 => .one
| 1 => by simpa using hM
| (k + 2) => by
rw [pow_succ, pow_succ']
simpa only [hM.isHermitian.eq] using (hM.pow k).mul_mul_conjTranspose_same M
protected lemma inv [DecidableEq n] {M : Matrix n n R} (hM : M.PosSemidef) : M⁻¹.PosSemidef := by
by_cases h : IsUnit M.det
· have := (conjTranspose_mul_mul_same hM M⁻¹).conjTranspose
rwa [mul_nonsing_inv_cancel_right _ _ h, conjTranspose_conjTranspose] at this
· rw [nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit _ h]
exact .zero
protected lemma zpow [StarOrderedRing R] [DecidableEq n]
{M : Matrix n n R} (hM : M.PosSemidef) (z : ℤ) :
(M ^ z).PosSemidef := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl | rfl⟩ := z.eq_nat_or_neg
· simpa using hM.pow n
· simpa using (hM.pow n).inv
protected lemma add [AddLeftMono R] {A : Matrix m m R} {B : Matrix m m R}
(hA : A.PosSemidef) (hB : B.PosSemidef) : (A + B).PosSemidef :=
⟨hA.isHermitian.add hB.isHermitian, fun x => by
rw [add_mulVec, dotProduct_add]
exact add_nonneg (hA.2 x) (hB.2 x)⟩
/-- The eigenvalues of a positive semi-definite matrix are non-negative -/
lemma eigenvalues_nonneg [DecidableEq n] {A : Matrix n n 𝕜}
(hA : Matrix.PosSemidef A) (i : n) : 0 ≤ hA.1.eigenvalues i :=
(hA.re_dotProduct_nonneg _).trans_eq (hA.1.eigenvalues_eq _).symm
section sqrt
variable [DecidableEq n] {A : Matrix n n 𝕜} (hA : PosSemidef A)
/-- The positive semidefinite square root of a positive semidefinite matrix -/
noncomputable def sqrt : Matrix n n 𝕜 :=
hA.1.eigenvectorUnitary.1 * diagonal ((↑) ∘ Real.sqrt ∘ hA.1.eigenvalues) *
(star hA.1.eigenvectorUnitary : Matrix n n 𝕜)
open Lean PrettyPrinter.Delaborator SubExpr in
/-- Custom elaborator to produce output like `(_ : PosSemidef A).sqrt` in the goal view. -/
@[app_delab Matrix.PosSemidef.sqrt]
def delabSqrt : Delab :=
whenPPOption getPPNotation <|
whenNotPPOption getPPAnalysisSkip <|
withOverApp 7 <|
withOptionAtCurrPos `pp.analysis.skip true do
let e ← getExpr
guard <| e.isAppOfArity ``Matrix.PosSemidef.sqrt 7
let optionsPerPos ← withNaryArg 6 do
return (← read).optionsPerPos.setBool (← getPos) `pp.proofs.withType true
withTheReader Context ({· with optionsPerPos}) delab
lemma posSemidef_sqrt : PosSemidef hA.sqrt := by
apply PosSemidef.mul_mul_conjTranspose_same
refine posSemidef_diagonal_iff.mpr fun i ↦ ?_
rw [Function.comp_apply, RCLike.nonneg_iff]
constructor
· simp only [RCLike.ofReal_re]
exact Real.sqrt_nonneg _
· simp only [RCLike.ofReal_im]
@[simp]
lemma sq_sqrt : hA.sqrt ^ 2 = A := by
let C : Matrix n n 𝕜 := hA.1.eigenvectorUnitary
let E := diagonal ((↑) ∘ Real.sqrt ∘ hA.1.eigenvalues : n → 𝕜)
suffices C * (E * (star C * C) * E) * star C = A by
rw [Matrix.PosSemidef.sqrt, pow_two]
simpa only [← mul_assoc] using this
have : E * E = diagonal ((↑) ∘ hA.1.eigenvalues) := by
rw [diagonal_mul_diagonal]
congr! with v
simp [← pow_two, ← RCLike.ofReal_pow, Real.sq_sqrt (hA.eigenvalues_nonneg v)]
simpa [C, this] using hA.1.spectral_theorem.symm
@[simp]
lemma sqrt_mul_self : hA.sqrt * hA.sqrt = A := by rw [← pow_two, sq_sqrt]
include hA in
lemma eq_of_sq_eq_sq {B : Matrix n n 𝕜} (hB : PosSemidef B) (hAB : A ^ 2 = B ^ 2) : A = B := by
/- This is deceptively hard, much more difficult than the positive *definite* case. We follow a
clever proof due to Koeber and Schäfer. The idea is that if `A ≠ B`, then `A - B` has a nonzero
real eigenvalue, with eigenvector `v`. Then a manipulation using the identity
`A ^ 2 - B ^ 2 = A * (A - B) + (A - B) * B` leads to the conclusion that
`⟨v, A v⟩ + ⟨v, B v⟩ = 0`. Since `A, B` are positive semidefinite, both terms must be zero. Thus
`⟨v, (A - B) v⟩ = 0`, but this is a nonzero scalar multiple of `⟨v, v⟩`, contradiction. -/
by_contra h_ne
let ⟨v, t, ht, hv, hv'⟩ := (hA.1.sub hB.1).exists_eigenvector_of_ne_zero (sub_ne_zero.mpr h_ne)
have h_sum : 0 = t * (star v ⬝ᵥ A *ᵥ v + star v ⬝ᵥ B *ᵥ v) := calc
0 = star v ⬝ᵥ (A ^ 2 - B ^ 2) *ᵥ v := by rw [hAB, sub_self, zero_mulVec, dotProduct_zero]
_ = star v ⬝ᵥ A *ᵥ (A - B) *ᵥ v + star v ⬝ᵥ (A - B) *ᵥ B *ᵥ v := by
rw [mulVec_mulVec, mulVec_mulVec, ← dotProduct_add, ← add_mulVec, mul_sub, sub_mul,
add_sub, sub_add_cancel, pow_two, pow_two]
_ = t * (star v ⬝ᵥ A *ᵥ v) + (star v) ᵥ* (A - B)ᴴ ⬝ᵥ B *ᵥ v := by
rw [hv', mulVec_smul, dotProduct_smul, RCLike.real_smul_eq_coe_mul,
dotProduct_mulVec _ (A - B), hA.1.sub hB.1]
_ = t * (star v ⬝ᵥ A *ᵥ v + star v ⬝ᵥ B *ᵥ v) := by
simp_rw [← star_mulVec, hv', mul_add, ← RCLike.real_smul_eq_coe_mul, ← smul_dotProduct]
congr 2 with i
simp only [Pi.star_apply, Pi.smul_apply, RCLike.real_smul_eq_coe_mul, star_mul',
RCLike.star_def, RCLike.conj_ofReal]
replace h_sum : star v ⬝ᵥ A *ᵥ v + star v ⬝ᵥ B *ᵥ v = 0 := by
rw [eq_comm, ← mul_zero (t : 𝕜)] at h_sum
| exact mul_left_cancel₀ (RCLike.ofReal_ne_zero.mpr ht) h_sum
have h_van : star v ⬝ᵥ A *ᵥ v = 0 ∧ star v ⬝ᵥ B *ᵥ v = 0 := by
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/PosDef.lean | 245 | 246 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Logic.Small.Basic
import Mathlib.SetTheory.ZFC.PSet
/-!
# A model of ZFC
In this file, we model Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory (+ choice) using Lean's underlying type theory,
building on the pre-sets defined in `Mathlib.SetTheory.ZFC.PSet`.
The theory of classes is developed in `Mathlib.SetTheory.ZFC.Class`.
## Main definitions
* `ZFSet`: ZFC set. Defined as `PSet` quotiented by `PSet.Equiv`, the extensional equivalence.
* `ZFSet.choice`: Axiom of choice. Proved from Lean's axiom of choice.
* `ZFSet.omega`: The von Neumann ordinal `ω` as a `Set`.
* `Classical.allZFSetDefinable`: All functions are classically definable.
* `ZFSet.IsFunc` : Predicate that a ZFC set is a subset of `x × y` that can be considered as a ZFC
function `x → y`. That is, each member of `x` is related by the ZFC set to exactly one member of
`y`.
* `ZFSet.funs`: ZFC set of ZFC functions `x → y`.
* `ZFSet.Hereditarily p x`: Predicate that every set in the transitive closure of `x` has property
`p`.
## Notes
To avoid confusion between the Lean `Set` and the ZFC `Set`, docstrings in this file refer to them
respectively as "`Set`" and "ZFC set".
-/
universe u
/-- The ZFC universe of sets consists of the type of pre-sets,
quotiented by extensional equivalence. -/
@[pp_with_univ]
def ZFSet : Type (u + 1) :=
Quotient PSet.setoid.{u}
namespace ZFSet
/-- Turns a pre-set into a ZFC set. -/
def mk : PSet → ZFSet :=
Quotient.mk''
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq (x : PSet) : @Eq ZFSet ⟦x⟧ (mk x) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_out : ∀ x : ZFSet, mk x.out = x :=
Quotient.out_eq
/-- A set function is "definable" if it is the image of some n-ary `PSet`
function. This isn't exactly definability, but is useful as a sufficient
condition for functions that have a computable image. -/
class Definable (n) (f : (Fin n → ZFSet.{u}) → ZFSet.{u}) where
/-- Turns a definable function into an n-ary `PSet` function. -/
out : (Fin n → PSet.{u}) → PSet.{u}
/-- A set function `f` is the image of `Definable.out f`. -/
mk_out xs : mk (out xs) = f (mk <| xs ·) := by simp
attribute [simp] Definable.mk_out
/-- An abbrev of `ZFSet.Definable` for unary functions. -/
abbrev Definable₁ (f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}) := Definable 1 (fun s ↦ f (s 0))
/-- A simpler constructor for `ZFSet.Definable₁`. -/
abbrev Definable₁.mk {f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}}
(out : PSet.{u} → PSet.{u}) (mk_out : ∀ x, ⟦out x⟧ = f ⟦x⟧) :
Definable₁ f where
out xs := out (xs 0)
mk_out xs := mk_out (xs 0)
/-- Turns a unary definable function into a unary `PSet` function. -/
abbrev Definable₁.out (f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}) [Definable₁ f] :
PSet.{u} → PSet.{u} :=
fun x ↦ Definable.out (fun s ↦ f (s 0)) ![x]
lemma Definable₁.mk_out {f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}} [Definable₁ f]
{x : PSet} :
.mk (out f x) = f (.mk x) :=
Definable.mk_out ![x]
/-- An abbrev of `ZFSet.Definable` for binary functions. -/
abbrev Definable₂ (f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}) := Definable 2 (fun s ↦ f (s 0) (s 1))
/-- A simpler constructor for `ZFSet.Definable₂`. -/
abbrev Definable₂.mk {f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}}
(out : PSet.{u} → PSet.{u} → PSet.{u}) (mk_out : ∀ x y, ⟦out x y⟧ = f ⟦x⟧ ⟦y⟧) :
Definable₂ f where
out xs := out (xs 0) (xs 1)
mk_out xs := mk_out (xs 0) (xs 1)
/-- Turns a binary definable function into a binary `PSet` function. -/
abbrev Definable₂.out (f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}) [Definable₂ f] :
PSet.{u} → PSet.{u} → PSet.{u} :=
fun x y ↦ Definable.out (fun s ↦ f (s 0) (s 1)) ![x, y]
lemma Definable₂.mk_out {f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}} [Definable₂ f]
{x y : PSet} :
.mk (out f x y) = f (.mk x) (.mk y) :=
Definable.mk_out ![x, y]
instance (f) [Definable₁ f] (n g) [Definable n g] :
Definable n (fun s ↦ f (g s)) where
out xs := Definable₁.out f (Definable.out g xs)
instance (f) [Definable₂ f] (n g₁ g₂) [Definable n g₁] [Definable n g₂] :
Definable n (fun s ↦ f (g₁ s) (g₂ s)) where
out xs := Definable₂.out f (Definable.out g₁ xs) (Definable.out g₂ xs)
instance (n) (i) : Definable n (fun s ↦ s i) where
out s := s i
lemma Definable.out_equiv {n} (f : (Fin n → ZFSet.{u}) → ZFSet.{u}) [Definable n f]
{xs ys : Fin n → PSet} (h : ∀ i, xs i ≈ ys i) :
out f xs ≈ out f ys := by
rw [← Quotient.eq_iff_equiv, mk_eq, mk_eq, mk_out, mk_out]
exact congrArg _ (funext fun i ↦ Quotient.sound (h i))
lemma Definable₁.out_equiv (f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}) [Definable₁ f]
{x y : PSet} (h : x ≈ y) :
out f x ≈ out f y :=
Definable.out_equiv _ (by simp [h])
lemma Definable₂.out_equiv (f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}) [Definable₂ f]
{x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : PSet} (h₁ : x₁ ≈ y₁) (h₂ : x₂ ≈ y₂) :
out f x₁ x₂ ≈ out f y₁ y₂ :=
Definable.out_equiv _ (by simp [Fin.forall_fin_succ, h₁, h₂])
end ZFSet
namespace Classical
open PSet ZFSet
/-- All functions are classically definable. -/
noncomputable def allZFSetDefinable {n} (F : (Fin n → ZFSet.{u}) → ZFSet.{u}) : Definable n F where
out xs := (F (mk <| xs ·)).out
end Classical
namespace ZFSet
open PSet
theorem eq {x y : PSet} : mk x = mk y ↔ Equiv x y :=
Quotient.eq
theorem sound {x y : PSet} (h : PSet.Equiv x y) : mk x = mk y :=
Quotient.sound h
theorem exact {x y : PSet} : mk x = mk y → PSet.Equiv x y :=
Quotient.exact
/-- The membership relation for ZFC sets is inherited from the membership relation for pre-sets. -/
protected def Mem : ZFSet → ZFSet → Prop :=
Quotient.lift₂ (· ∈ ·) fun _ _ _ _ hx hy =>
propext ((Mem.congr_left hx).trans (Mem.congr_right hy))
instance : Membership ZFSet ZFSet where
mem t s := ZFSet.Mem s t
@[simp]
theorem mk_mem_iff {x y : PSet} : mk x ∈ mk y ↔ x ∈ y :=
Iff.rfl
/-- Convert a ZFC set into a `Set` of ZFC sets -/
def toSet (u : ZFSet.{u}) : Set ZFSet.{u} :=
{ x | x ∈ u }
@[simp]
theorem mem_toSet (a u : ZFSet.{u}) : a ∈ u.toSet ↔ a ∈ u :=
Iff.rfl
instance small_toSet (x : ZFSet.{u}) : Small.{u} x.toSet :=
Quotient.inductionOn x fun a => by
let f : a.Type → (mk a).toSet := fun i => ⟨mk <| a.Func i, func_mem a i⟩
suffices Function.Surjective f by exact small_of_surjective this
rintro ⟨y, hb⟩
induction y using Quotient.inductionOn
obtain ⟨i, h⟩ := hb
exact ⟨i, Subtype.coe_injective (Quotient.sound h.symm)⟩
/-- A nonempty set is one that contains some element. -/
protected def Nonempty (u : ZFSet) : Prop :=
u.toSet.Nonempty
theorem nonempty_def (u : ZFSet) : u.Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ u :=
Iff.rfl
theorem nonempty_of_mem {x u : ZFSet} (h : x ∈ u) : u.Nonempty :=
⟨x, h⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_toSet_iff {u : ZFSet} : u.toSet.Nonempty ↔ u.Nonempty :=
Iff.rfl
/-- `x ⊆ y` as ZFC sets means that all members of `x` are members of `y`. -/
protected def Subset (x y : ZFSet.{u}) :=
∀ ⦃z⦄, z ∈ x → z ∈ y
instance hasSubset : HasSubset ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.Subset⟩
theorem subset_def {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : x ⊆ y ↔ ∀ ⦃z⦄, z ∈ x → z ∈ y :=
Iff.rfl
instance : IsRefl ZFSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ => id⟩
instance : IsTrans ZFSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ hxy hyz _ ha => hyz (hxy ha)⟩
@[simp]
theorem subset_iff : ∀ {x y : PSet}, mk x ⊆ mk y ↔ x ⊆ y
| ⟨_, A⟩, ⟨_, _⟩ =>
⟨fun h a => @h ⟦A a⟧ (Mem.mk A a), fun h z =>
Quotient.inductionOn z fun _ ⟨a, za⟩ =>
let ⟨b, ab⟩ := h a
⟨b, za.trans ab⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem toSet_subset_iff {x y : ZFSet} : x.toSet ⊆ y.toSet ↔ x ⊆ y := by
simp [subset_def, Set.subset_def]
@[ext]
theorem ext {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : (∀ z : ZFSet.{u}, z ∈ x ↔ z ∈ y) → x = y :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun _ _ h => Quotient.sound (Mem.ext fun w => h ⟦w⟧)
theorem toSet_injective : Function.Injective toSet := fun _ _ h => ext <| Set.ext_iff.1 h
@[simp]
theorem toSet_inj {x y : ZFSet} : x.toSet = y.toSet ↔ x = y :=
toSet_injective.eq_iff
instance : IsAntisymm ZFSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ hab hba => ext fun c => ⟨@hab c, @hba c⟩⟩
/-- The empty ZFC set -/
protected def empty : ZFSet :=
mk ∅
instance : EmptyCollection ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.empty⟩
instance : Inhabited ZFSet :=
⟨∅⟩
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_empty (x) : x ∉ (∅ : ZFSet.{u}) :=
Quotient.inductionOn x PSet.not_mem_empty
@[simp]
theorem toSet_empty : toSet ∅ = ∅ := by simp [toSet]
@[simp]
theorem empty_subset (x : ZFSet.{u}) : (∅ : ZFSet) ⊆ x :=
Quotient.inductionOn x fun y => subset_iff.2 <| PSet.empty_subset y
@[simp]
theorem not_nonempty_empty : ¬ZFSet.Nonempty ∅ := by simp [ZFSet.Nonempty]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_mk_iff {x : PSet} : (mk x).Nonempty ↔ x.Nonempty := by
refine ⟨?_, fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨mk a, h⟩⟩
rintro ⟨a, h⟩
induction a using Quotient.inductionOn
exact ⟨_, h⟩
theorem eq_empty (x : ZFSet.{u}) : x = ∅ ↔ ∀ y : ZFSet.{u}, y ∉ x := by
simp [ZFSet.ext_iff]
theorem eq_empty_or_nonempty (u : ZFSet) : u = ∅ ∨ u.Nonempty := by
rw [eq_empty, ← not_exists]
apply em'
/-- `Insert x y` is the set `{x} ∪ y` -/
protected def Insert : ZFSet → ZFSet → ZFSet :=
Quotient.map₂ PSet.insert
fun _ _ uv ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨fun o =>
match o with
| some a =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := αβ a
⟨some b, hb⟩
| none => ⟨none, uv⟩,
fun o =>
match o with
| some b =>
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := βα b
⟨some a, ha⟩
| none => ⟨none, uv⟩⟩
instance : Insert ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.Insert⟩
instance : Singleton ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨fun x => insert x ∅⟩
instance : LawfulSingleton ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨fun _ => rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_insert_iff {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : x ∈ insert y z ↔ x = y ∨ x ∈ z :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ x y z fun _ _ _ => PSet.mem_insert_iff.trans (or_congr_left eq.symm)
theorem mem_insert (x y : ZFSet) : x ∈ insert x y :=
mem_insert_iff.2 <| Or.inl rfl
theorem mem_insert_of_mem {y z : ZFSet} (x) (h : z ∈ y) : z ∈ insert x y :=
mem_insert_iff.2 <| Or.inr h
@[simp]
theorem toSet_insert (x y : ZFSet) : (insert x y).toSet = insert x y.toSet := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem mem_singleton {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : x ∈ @singleton ZFSet.{u} ZFSet.{u} _ y ↔ x = y :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun _ _ => PSet.mem_singleton.trans eq.symm
@[simp]
theorem toSet_singleton (x : ZFSet) : ({x} : ZFSet).toSet = {x} := by
ext
simp
theorem insert_nonempty (u v : ZFSet) : (insert u v).Nonempty :=
⟨u, mem_insert u v⟩
theorem singleton_nonempty (u : ZFSet) : ZFSet.Nonempty {u} :=
insert_nonempty u ∅
theorem mem_pair {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : x ∈ ({y, z} : ZFSet) ↔ x = y ∨ x = z := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem pair_eq_singleton (x : ZFSet) : {x, x} = ({x} : ZFSet) := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem pair_eq_singleton_iff {x y z : ZFSet} : ({x, y} : ZFSet) = {z} ↔ x = z ∧ y = z := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← mem_singleton, ← mem_singleton]
simp [← h]
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact pair_eq_singleton y
@[simp]
theorem singleton_eq_pair_iff {x y z : ZFSet} : ({x} : ZFSet) = {y, z} ↔ x = y ∧ x = z := by
rw [eq_comm, pair_eq_singleton_iff]
simp_rw [eq_comm]
/-- `omega` is the first infinite von Neumann ordinal -/
def omega : ZFSet :=
mk PSet.omega
@[simp]
theorem omega_zero : ∅ ∈ omega :=
⟨⟨0⟩, Equiv.rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem omega_succ {n} : n ∈ omega.{u} → insert n n ∈ omega.{u} :=
Quotient.inductionOn n fun x ⟨⟨n⟩, h⟩ =>
⟨⟨n + 1⟩,
ZFSet.exact <|
show insert (mk x) (mk x) = insert (mk <| ofNat n) (mk <| ofNat n) by
rw [ZFSet.sound h]
rfl⟩
/-- `{x ∈ a | p x}` is the set of elements in `a` satisfying `p` -/
protected def sep (p : ZFSet → Prop) : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
Quotient.map (PSet.sep fun y => p (mk y))
fun ⟨α, A⟩ ⟨β, B⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨fun ⟨a, pa⟩ =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := αβ a
⟨⟨b, by simpa only [mk_func, ← ZFSet.sound hb]⟩, hb⟩,
fun ⟨b, pb⟩ =>
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := βα b
⟨⟨a, by simpa only [mk_func, ZFSet.sound ha]⟩, ha⟩⟩
-- Porting note: the { x | p x } notation appears to be disabled in Lean 4.
instance : Sep ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.sep⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_sep {p : ZFSet.{u} → Prop} {x y : ZFSet.{u}} :
y ∈ ZFSet.sep p x ↔ y ∈ x ∧ p y :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun _ _ =>
PSet.mem_sep (p := p ∘ mk) fun _ _ h => (Quotient.sound h).subst
@[simp]
theorem sep_empty (p : ZFSet → Prop) : (∅ : ZFSet).sep p = ∅ :=
(eq_empty _).mpr fun _ h ↦ not_mem_empty _ (mem_sep.mp h).1
@[simp]
theorem toSet_sep (a : ZFSet) (p : ZFSet → Prop) :
(ZFSet.sep p a).toSet = { x ∈ a.toSet | p x } := by
ext
simp
/-- The powerset operation, the collection of subsets of a ZFC set -/
def powerset : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
Quotient.map PSet.powerset
fun ⟨_, A⟩ ⟨_, B⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨fun p =>
⟨{ b | ∃ a, p a ∧ Equiv (A a) (B b) }, fun ⟨a, pa⟩ =>
let ⟨b, ab⟩ := αβ a
⟨⟨b, a, pa, ab⟩, ab⟩,
fun ⟨_, a, pa, ab⟩ => ⟨⟨a, pa⟩, ab⟩⟩,
fun q =>
⟨{ a | ∃ b, q b ∧ Equiv (A a) (B b) }, fun ⟨_, b, qb, ab⟩ => ⟨⟨b, qb⟩, ab⟩, fun ⟨b, qb⟩ =>
let ⟨a, ab⟩ := βα b
⟨⟨a, b, qb, ab⟩, ab⟩⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_powerset {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : y ∈ powerset x ↔ y ⊆ x :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun _ _ => PSet.mem_powerset.trans subset_iff.symm
theorem sUnion_lem {α β : Type u} (A : α → PSet) (B : β → PSet) (αβ : ∀ a, ∃ b, Equiv (A a) (B b)) :
∀ a, ∃ b, Equiv ((sUnion ⟨α, A⟩).Func a) ((sUnion ⟨β, B⟩).Func b)
| ⟨a, c⟩ => by
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := αβ a
induction' ea : A a with γ Γ
induction' eb : B b with δ Δ
rw [ea, eb] at hb
obtain ⟨γδ, δγ⟩ := hb
let c : (A a).Type := c
let ⟨d, hd⟩ := γδ (by rwa [ea] at c)
use ⟨b, Eq.ndrec d (Eq.symm eb)⟩
change PSet.Equiv ((A a).Func c) ((B b).Func (Eq.ndrec d eb.symm))
match A a, B b, ea, eb, c, d, hd with
| _, _, rfl, rfl, _, _, hd => exact hd
/-- The union operator, the collection of elements of elements of a ZFC set -/
def sUnion : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
Quotient.map PSet.sUnion
fun ⟨_, A⟩ ⟨_, B⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨sUnion_lem A B αβ, fun a =>
Exists.elim
(sUnion_lem B A (fun b => Exists.elim (βα b) fun c hc => ⟨c, PSet.Equiv.symm hc⟩) a)
fun b hb => ⟨b, PSet.Equiv.symm hb⟩⟩
@[inherit_doc]
prefix:110 "⋃₀ " => ZFSet.sUnion
/-- The intersection operator, the collection of elements in all of the elements of a ZFC set. We
define `⋂₀ ∅ = ∅`. -/
def sInter (x : ZFSet) : ZFSet := (⋃₀ x).sep (fun y => ∀ z ∈ x, y ∈ z)
@[inherit_doc]
prefix:110 "⋂₀ " => ZFSet.sInter
@[simp]
theorem mem_sUnion {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : y ∈ ⋃₀ x ↔ ∃ z ∈ x, y ∈ z :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun _ _ => PSet.mem_sUnion.trans
⟨fun ⟨z, h⟩ => ⟨⟦z⟧, h⟩, fun ⟨z, h⟩ => Quotient.inductionOn z (fun z h => ⟨z, h⟩) h⟩
theorem mem_sInter {x y : ZFSet} (h : x.Nonempty) : y ∈ ⋂₀ x ↔ ∀ z ∈ x, y ∈ z := by
unfold sInter
simp only [and_iff_right_iff_imp, mem_sep]
intro mem
apply mem_sUnion.mpr
replace ⟨s, h⟩ := h
exact ⟨_, h, mem _ h⟩
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_empty : ⋃₀ (∅ : ZFSet.{u}) = ∅ := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem sInter_empty : ⋂₀ (∅ : ZFSet) = ∅ := by simp [sInter]
theorem mem_of_mem_sInter {x y z : ZFSet} (hy : y ∈ ⋂₀ x) (hz : z ∈ x) : y ∈ z := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty x with (rfl | hx)
· exact (not_mem_empty z hz).elim
· exact (mem_sInter hx).1 hy z hz
theorem mem_sUnion_of_mem {x y z : ZFSet} (hy : y ∈ z) (hz : z ∈ x) : y ∈ ⋃₀ x :=
mem_sUnion.2 ⟨z, hz, hy⟩
theorem not_mem_sInter_of_not_mem {x y z : ZFSet} (hy : ¬y ∈ z) (hz : z ∈ x) : ¬y ∈ ⋂₀ x :=
fun hx => hy <| mem_of_mem_sInter hx hz
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_singleton {x : ZFSet.{u}} : ⋃₀ ({x} : ZFSet) = x :=
ext fun y => by simp_rw [mem_sUnion, mem_singleton, exists_eq_left]
@[simp]
theorem sInter_singleton {x : ZFSet.{u}} : ⋂₀ ({x} : ZFSet) = x :=
ext fun y => by simp_rw [mem_sInter (singleton_nonempty x), mem_singleton, forall_eq]
@[simp]
theorem toSet_sUnion (x : ZFSet.{u}) : (⋃₀ x).toSet = ⋃₀ (toSet '' x.toSet) := by
ext
simp
theorem toSet_sInter {x : ZFSet.{u}} (h : x.Nonempty) : (⋂₀ x).toSet = ⋂₀ (toSet '' x.toSet) := by
ext
simp [mem_sInter h]
theorem singleton_injective : Function.Injective (@singleton ZFSet ZFSet _) := fun x y H => by
let this := congr_arg sUnion H
rwa [sUnion_singleton, sUnion_singleton] at this
@[simp]
theorem singleton_inj {x y : ZFSet} : ({x} : ZFSet) = {y} ↔ x = y :=
singleton_injective.eq_iff
/-- The binary union operation -/
protected def union (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
⋃₀ {x, y}
/-- The binary intersection operation -/
protected def inter (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
ZFSet.sep (fun z => z ∈ y) x -- { z ∈ x | z ∈ y }
/-- The set difference operation -/
protected def diff (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
ZFSet.sep (fun z => z ∉ y) x -- { z ∈ x | z ∉ y }
instance : Union ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.union⟩
instance : Inter ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.inter⟩
instance : SDiff ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.diff⟩
@[simp]
theorem toSet_union (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : (x ∪ y).toSet = x.toSet ∪ y.toSet := by
change (⋃₀ {x, y}).toSet = _
simp
@[simp]
theorem toSet_inter (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : (x ∩ y).toSet = x.toSet ∩ y.toSet := by
change (ZFSet.sep (fun z => z ∈ y) x).toSet = _
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem toSet_sdiff (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : (x \ y).toSet = x.toSet \ y.toSet := by
change (ZFSet.sep (fun z => z ∉ y) x).toSet = _
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem mem_union {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : z ∈ x ∪ y ↔ z ∈ x ∨ z ∈ y := by
rw [← mem_toSet]
simp
@[simp]
theorem mem_inter {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : z ∈ x ∩ y ↔ z ∈ x ∧ z ∈ y :=
@mem_sep (fun z : ZFSet.{u} => z ∈ y) x z
@[simp]
theorem mem_diff {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : z ∈ x \ y ↔ z ∈ x ∧ z ∉ y :=
@mem_sep (fun z : ZFSet.{u} => z ∉ y) x z
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_pair {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : ⋃₀ ({x, y} : ZFSet.{u}) = x ∪ y :=
rfl
theorem mem_wf : @WellFounded ZFSet (· ∈ ·) :=
(wellFounded_lift₂_iff (H := fun a b c d hx hy =>
propext ((@Mem.congr_left a c hx).trans (@Mem.congr_right b d hy _)))).mpr PSet.mem_wf
/-- Induction on the `∈` relation. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn {p : ZFSet → Prop} (x) (h : ∀ x, (∀ y ∈ x, p y) → p x) : p x :=
mem_wf.induction x h
instance : IsWellFounded ZFSet (· ∈ ·) :=
⟨mem_wf⟩
instance : WellFoundedRelation ZFSet :=
⟨_, mem_wf⟩
theorem mem_asymm {x y : ZFSet} : x ∈ y → y ∉ x :=
asymm_of (· ∈ ·)
theorem mem_irrefl (x : ZFSet) : x ∉ x :=
irrefl_of (· ∈ ·) x
theorem not_subset_of_mem {x y : ZFSet} (h : x ∈ y) : ¬ y ⊆ x :=
fun h' ↦ mem_irrefl _ (h' h)
theorem not_mem_of_subset {x y : ZFSet} (h : x ⊆ y) : y ∉ x :=
imp_not_comm.2 not_subset_of_mem h
theorem regularity (x : ZFSet.{u}) (h : x ≠ ∅) : ∃ y ∈ x, x ∩ y = ∅ :=
by_contradiction fun ne =>
h <| (eq_empty x).2 fun y =>
@inductionOn (fun z => z ∉ x) y fun z IH zx =>
ne ⟨z, zx, (eq_empty _).2 fun w wxz =>
let ⟨wx, wz⟩ := mem_inter.1 wxz
IH w wz wx⟩
/-- The image of a (definable) ZFC set function -/
def image (f : ZFSet → ZFSet) [Definable₁ f] : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
let r := Definable₁.out f
Quotient.map (PSet.image r)
fun _ _ e =>
Mem.ext fun _ =>
(mem_image (fun _ _ ↦ Definable₁.out_equiv _)).trans <|
Iff.trans
⟨fun ⟨w, h1, h2⟩ => ⟨w, (Mem.congr_right e).1 h1, h2⟩, fun ⟨w, h1, h2⟩ =>
⟨w, (Mem.congr_right e).2 h1, h2⟩⟩ <|
(mem_image (fun _ _ ↦ Definable₁.out_equiv _)).symm
theorem image.mk (f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}) [Definable₁ f] (x) {y} : y ∈ x → f y ∈ image f x :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun ⟨_, _⟩ _ ⟨a, ya⟩ => by
simp only [mk_eq, ← Definable₁.mk_out (f := f)]
exact ⟨a, Definable₁.out_equiv f ya⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_image {f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}} [Definable₁ f] {x y : ZFSet.{u}} :
y ∈ image f x ↔ ∃ z ∈ x, f z = y :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun ⟨_, A⟩ _ =>
⟨fun ⟨a, ya⟩ => ⟨⟦A a⟧, Mem.mk A a, ((Quotient.sound ya).trans Definable₁.mk_out).symm⟩,
fun ⟨_, hz, e⟩ => e ▸ image.mk _ _ hz⟩
@[simp]
theorem toSet_image (f : ZFSet → ZFSet) [Definable₁ f] (x : ZFSet) :
(image f x).toSet = f '' x.toSet := by
ext
simp
/-- The range of a type-indexed family of sets. -/
noncomputable def range {α} [Small.{u} α] (f : α → ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
⟦⟨_, Quotient.out ∘ f ∘ (equivShrink α).symm⟩⟧
@[simp]
theorem mem_range {α} [Small.{u} α] {f : α → ZFSet.{u}} {x : ZFSet.{u}} :
x ∈ range f ↔ x ∈ Set.range f :=
Quotient.inductionOn x fun y => by
constructor
· rintro ⟨z, hz⟩
exact ⟨(equivShrink α).symm z, Quotient.eq_mk_iff_out.2 hz.symm⟩
· rintro ⟨z, hz⟩
use equivShrink α z
simpa [hz] using PSet.Equiv.symm (Quotient.mk_out y)
@[simp]
theorem toSet_range {α} [Small.{u} α] (f : α → ZFSet.{u}) :
(range f).toSet = Set.range f := by
ext
simp
/-- Kuratowski ordered pair -/
def pair (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
{{x}, {x, y}}
@[simp]
theorem toSet_pair (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : (pair x y).toSet = {{x}, {x, y}} := by simp [pair]
/-- A subset of pairs `{(a, b) ∈ x × y | p a b}` -/
def pairSep (p : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → Prop) (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
(powerset (powerset (x ∪ y))).sep fun z => ∃ a ∈ x, ∃ b ∈ y, z = pair a b ∧ p a b
@[simp]
theorem mem_pairSep {p} {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} :
z ∈ pairSep p x y ↔ ∃ a ∈ x, ∃ b ∈ y, z = pair a b ∧ p a b := by
refine mem_sep.trans ⟨And.right, fun e => ⟨?_, e⟩⟩
rcases e with ⟨a, ax, b, bY, rfl, pab⟩
simp only [mem_powerset, subset_def, mem_union, pair, mem_pair]
rintro u (rfl | rfl) v <;> simp only [mem_singleton, mem_pair]
· rintro rfl
exact Or.inl ax
· rintro (rfl | rfl) <;> [left; right] <;> assumption
theorem pair_injective : Function.Injective2 pair := by
intro x x' y y' H
simp_rw [ZFSet.ext_iff, pair, mem_pair] at H
obtain rfl : x = x' := And.left <| by simpa [or_and_left] using (H {x}).1 (Or.inl rfl)
have he : y = x → y = y' := by
rintro rfl
simpa [eq_comm] using H {y, y'}
have hx := H {x, y}
simp_rw [pair_eq_singleton_iff, true_and, or_true, true_iff] at hx
refine ⟨rfl, hx.elim he fun hy ↦ Or.elim ?_ he id⟩
simpa using ZFSet.ext_iff.1 hy y
@[simp]
theorem pair_inj {x y x' y' : ZFSet} : pair x y = pair x' y' ↔ x = x' ∧ y = y' :=
pair_injective.eq_iff
/-- The cartesian product, `{(a, b) | a ∈ x, b ∈ y}` -/
def prod : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} :=
pairSep fun _ _ => True
@[simp]
theorem mem_prod {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : z ∈ prod x y ↔ ∃ a ∈ x, ∃ b ∈ y, z = pair a b := by
simp [prod]
theorem pair_mem_prod {x y a b : ZFSet.{u}} : pair a b ∈ prod x y ↔ a ∈ x ∧ b ∈ y := by
simp
/-- `isFunc x y f` is the assertion that `f` is a subset of `x × y` which relates to each element
of `x` a unique element of `y`, so that we can consider `f` as a ZFC function `x → y`. -/
def IsFunc (x y f : ZFSet.{u}) : Prop :=
f ⊆ prod x y ∧ ∀ z : ZFSet.{u}, z ∈ x → ∃! w, pair z w ∈ f
/-- `funs x y` is `y ^ x`, the set of all set functions `x → y` -/
def funs (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
ZFSet.sep (IsFunc x y) (powerset (prod x y))
@[simp]
theorem mem_funs {x y f : ZFSet.{u}} : f ∈ funs x y ↔ IsFunc x y f := by simp [funs, IsFunc]
instance : Definable₁ ({·}) := .mk ({·}) (fun _ ↦ rfl)
instance : Definable₂ insert := .mk insert (fun _ _ ↦ rfl)
instance : Definable₂ pair := by unfold pair; infer_instance
/-- Graph of a function: `map f x` is the ZFC function which maps `a ∈ x` to `f a` -/
def map (f : ZFSet → ZFSet) [Definable₁ f] : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
image fun y => pair y (f y)
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {f : ZFSet → ZFSet} [Definable₁ f] {x y : ZFSet} :
y ∈ map f x ↔ ∃ z ∈ x, pair z (f z) = y :=
mem_image
theorem map_unique {f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}} [Definable₁ f] {x z : ZFSet.{u}}
(zx : z ∈ x) : ∃! w, pair z w ∈ map f x :=
⟨f z, image.mk _ _ zx, fun y yx => by
let ⟨w, _, we⟩ := mem_image.1 yx
let ⟨wz, fy⟩ := pair_injective we
rw [← fy, wz]⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_isFunc {f : ZFSet → ZFSet} [Definable₁ f] {x y : ZFSet} :
IsFunc x y (map f x) ↔ ∀ z ∈ x, f z ∈ y :=
⟨fun ⟨ss, h⟩ z zx =>
let ⟨_, t1, t2⟩ := h z zx
(t2 (f z) (image.mk _ _ zx)).symm ▸ (pair_mem_prod.1 (ss t1)).right,
fun h =>
⟨fun _ yx =>
let ⟨z, zx, ze⟩ := mem_image.1 yx
ze ▸ pair_mem_prod.2 ⟨zx, h z zx⟩,
fun _ => map_unique⟩⟩
/-- Given a predicate `p` on ZFC sets. `Hereditarily p x` means that `x` has property `p` and the
members of `x` are all `Hereditarily p`. -/
def Hereditarily (p : ZFSet → Prop) (x : ZFSet) : Prop :=
p x ∧ ∀ y ∈ x, Hereditarily p y
termination_by x
section Hereditarily
variable {p : ZFSet.{u} → Prop} {x y : ZFSet.{u}}
theorem hereditarily_iff : Hereditarily p x ↔ p x ∧ ∀ y ∈ x, Hereditarily p y := by
rw [← Hereditarily]
alias ⟨Hereditarily.def, _⟩ := hereditarily_iff
theorem Hereditarily.self (h : x.Hereditarily p) : p x :=
h.def.1
theorem Hereditarily.mem (h : x.Hereditarily p) (hy : y ∈ x) : y.Hereditarily p :=
h.def.2 _ hy
theorem Hereditarily.empty : Hereditarily p x → p ∅ := by
apply @ZFSet.inductionOn _ x
intro y IH h
rcases ZFSet.eq_empty_or_nonempty y with (rfl | ⟨a, ha⟩)
· exact h.self
· exact IH a ha (h.mem ha)
end Hereditarily
end ZFSet
| Mathlib/SetTheory/ZFC/Basic.lean | 949 | 952 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Batteries.Data.List.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Logic.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Logic.Relation
/-!
# Pairwise relations on a list
This file provides basic results about `List.Pairwise` and `List.pwFilter` (definitions are in
`Data.List.Defs`).
`Pairwise r [a 0, ..., a (n - 1)]` means `∀ i j, i < j → r (a i) (a j)`. For example,
`Pairwise (≠) l` means that all elements of `l` are distinct, and `Pairwise (<) l` means that `l`
is strictly increasing.
`pwFilter r l` is the list obtained by iteratively adding each element of `l` that doesn't break
the pairwiseness of the list we have so far. It thus yields `l'` a maximal sublist of `l` such that
`Pairwise r l'`.
## Tags
sorted, nodup
-/
open Nat Function
namespace List
variable {α β : Type*} {R : α → α → Prop} {l : List α} {a : α}
mk_iff_of_inductive_prop List.Pairwise List.pairwise_iff
/-! ### Pairwise -/
theorem Pairwise.forall_of_forall (H : Symmetric R) (H₁ : ∀ x ∈ l, R x x) (H₂ : l.Pairwise R) :
∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ l → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ l → R x y :=
H₂.forall_of_forall_of_flip H₁ <| by rwa [H.flip_eq]
theorem Pairwise.forall (hR : Symmetric R) (hl : l.Pairwise R) :
∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ l → ∀ ⦃b⦄, b ∈ l → a ≠ b → R a b := by
apply Pairwise.forall_of_forall
· exact fun a b h hne => hR (h hne.symm)
· exact fun _ _ hx => (hx rfl).elim
· exact hl.imp (@fun a b h _ => by exact h)
theorem Pairwise.set_pairwise (hl : Pairwise R l) (hr : Symmetric R) : { x | x ∈ l }.Pairwise R :=
hl.forall hr
theorem pairwise_of_reflexive_of_forall_ne (hr : Reflexive R)
(h : ∀ a ∈ l, ∀ b ∈ l, a ≠ b → R a b) : l.Pairwise R := by
rw [pairwise_iff_forall_sublist]
intro a b hab
if heq : a = b then
cases heq; apply hr
else
apply h <;> try (apply hab.subset; simp)
exact heq
theorem Pairwise.rel_head_tail (h₁ : l.Pairwise R) (ha : a ∈ l.tail) :
R (l.head <| ne_nil_of_mem <| mem_of_mem_tail ha) a := by
cases l with
| nil => simp at ha
| cons b l => exact (pairwise_cons.1 h₁).1 a ha
theorem Pairwise.rel_head_of_rel_head_head (h₁ : l.Pairwise R) (ha : a ∈ l)
(hhead : R (l.head <| ne_nil_of_mem ha) (l.head <| ne_nil_of_mem ha)) :
R (l.head <| ne_nil_of_mem ha) a := by
cases l with
| nil => simp at ha
| cons b l => exact (mem_cons.mp ha).elim (· ▸ hhead) ((pairwise_cons.1 h₁).1 _)
theorem Pairwise.rel_head [IsRefl α R] (h₁ : l.Pairwise R) (ha : a ∈ l) :
R (l.head <| ne_nil_of_mem ha) a :=
h₁.rel_head_of_rel_head_head ha (refl_of ..)
theorem Pairwise.rel_dropLast_getLast (h : l.Pairwise R) (ha : a ∈ l.dropLast) :
R a (l.getLast <| ne_nil_of_mem <| dropLast_subset _ ha) := by
rw [← pairwise_reverse] at h
rw [getLast_eq_head_reverse]
exact h.rel_head_tail (by rwa [tail_reverse, mem_reverse])
theorem Pairwise.rel_getLast_of_rel_getLast_getLast (h₁ : l.Pairwise R) (ha : a ∈ l)
(hlast : R (l.getLast <| ne_nil_of_mem ha) (l.getLast <| ne_nil_of_mem ha)) :
R a (l.getLast <| ne_nil_of_mem ha) := by
rw [← dropLast_concat_getLast (ne_nil_of_mem ha), mem_append, List.mem_singleton] at ha
exact ha.elim h₁.rel_dropLast_getLast (· ▸ hlast)
theorem Pairwise.rel_getLast [IsRefl α R] (h₁ : l.Pairwise R) (ha : a ∈ l) :
R a (l.getLast <| ne_nil_of_mem ha) :=
h₁.rel_getLast_of_rel_getLast_getLast ha (refl_of ..)
protected alias ⟨Pairwise.of_reverse, Pairwise.reverse⟩ := pairwise_reverse
/-! ### Pairwise filtering -/
protected alias ⟨_, Pairwise.pwFilter⟩ := pwFilter_eq_self
end List
| Mathlib/Data/List/Pairwise.lean | 152 | 156 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Peter Nelson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Peter Nelson
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Finite
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Powerset
/-!
# Noncomputable Set Cardinality
We define the cardinality of set `s` as a term `Set.encard s : ℕ∞` and a term `Set.ncard s : ℕ`.
The latter takes the junk value of zero if `s` is infinite. Both functions are noncomputable, and
are defined in terms of `ENat.card` (which takes a type as its argument); this file can be seen
as an API for the same function in the special case where the type is a coercion of a `Set`,
allowing for smoother interactions with the `Set` API.
`Set.encard` never takes junk values, so is more mathematically natural than `Set.ncard`, even
though it takes values in a less convenient type. It is probably the right choice in settings where
one is concerned with the cardinalities of sets that may or may not be infinite.
`Set.ncard` has a nicer codomain, but when using it, `Set.Finite` hypotheses are normally needed to
make sure its values are meaningful. More generally, `Set.ncard` is intended to be used over the
obvious alternative `Finset.card` when finiteness is 'propositional' rather than 'structural'.
When working with sets that are finite by virtue of their definition, then `Finset.card` probably
makes more sense. One setting where `Set.ncard` works nicely is in a type `α` with `[Finite α]`,
where every set is automatically finite. In this setting, we use default arguments and a simple
tactic so that finiteness goals are discharged automatically in `Set.ncard` theorems.
## Main Definitions
* `Set.encard s` is the cardinality of the set `s` as an extended natural number, with value `⊤` if
`s` is infinite.
* `Set.ncard s` is the cardinality of the set `s` as a natural number, provided `s` is Finite.
If `s` is Infinite, then `Set.ncard s = 0`.
* `toFinite_tac` is a tactic that tries to synthesize a `Set.Finite s` argument with
`Set.toFinite`. This will work for `s : Set α` where there is a `Finite α` instance.
## Implementation Notes
The theorems in this file are very similar to those in `Data.Finset.Card`, but with `Set` operations
instead of `Finset`. We first prove all the theorems for `Set.encard`, and then derive most of the
`Set.ncard` results as a consequence. Things are done this way to avoid reliance on the `Finset` API
for theorems about infinite sets, and to allow for a refactor that removes or modifies `Set.ncard`
in the future.
Nearly all the theorems for `Set.ncard` require finiteness of one or more of their arguments. We
provide this assumption with a default argument of the form `(hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)`,
where `toFinite_tac` will find an `s.Finite` term in the cases where `s` is a set in a `Finite`
type.
Often, where there are two set arguments `s` and `t`, the finiteness of one follows from the other
in the context of the theorem, in which case we only include the ones that are needed, and derive
the other inside the proof. A few of the theorems, such as `ncard_union_le` do not require
finiteness arguments; they are true by coincidence due to junk values.
-/
namespace Set
variable {α β : Type*} {s t : Set α}
/-- The cardinality of a set as a term in `ℕ∞` -/
noncomputable def encard (s : Set α) : ℕ∞ := ENat.card s
@[simp] theorem encard_univ_coe (s : Set α) : encard (univ : Set s) = encard s := by
rw [encard, encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.univ ↑s)]
theorem encard_univ (α : Type*) :
encard (univ : Set α) = ENat.card α := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.univ α)]
theorem Finite.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (h : s.Finite) : s.encard = h.toFinset.card := by
have := h.fintype
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_coe_fintype_card, toFinite_toFinset, toFinset_card]
theorem encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : encard s = s.toFinset.card := by
have h := toFinite s
rw [h.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card, toFinite_toFinset]
@[simp] theorem toENat_cardinalMk (s : Set α) : (Cardinal.mk s).toENat = s.encard := rfl
theorem toENat_cardinalMk_subtype (P : α → Prop) :
(Cardinal.mk {x // P x}).toENat = {x | P x}.encard :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_fintypeCard (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : Fintype.card s = s.encard := by
simp [encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem encard_coe_eq_coe_finsetCard (s : Finset α) :
encard (s : Set α) = s.card := by
rw [Finite.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (Finset.finite_toSet s)]; simp
@[simp] theorem Infinite.encard_eq {s : Set α} (h : s.Infinite) : s.encard = ⊤ := by
have := h.to_subtype
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_top_of_infinite]
@[simp] theorem encard_eq_zero : s.encard = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := by
| rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_zero_iff_empty, isEmpty_subtype, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Card.lean | 98 | 99 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Field.UnitBall
/-!
# The circle
This file defines `circle` to be the metric sphere (`Metric.sphere`) in `ℂ` centred at `0` of
radius `1`. We equip it with the following structure:
* a submonoid of `ℂ`
* a group
* a topological group
We furthermore define `Circle.exp` to be the natural map `fun t ↦ exp (t * I)` from `ℝ` to
`circle`, and show that this map is a group homomorphism.
We define two additive characters onto the circle:
* `Real.fourierChar`: The character `fun x ↦ exp ((2 * π * x) * I)` (for which we introduce the
notation `𝐞` in the locale `FourierTransform`). This uses the analyst convention that there is a
`2 * π` in the exponent.
* `Real.probChar`: The character `fun x ↦ exp (x * I)`, which uses the probabilist convention that
there is no `2 * π` in the exponent.
## Implementation notes
Because later (in `Geometry.Manifold.Instances.Sphere`) one wants to equip the circle with a smooth
manifold structure borrowed from `Metric.sphere`, the underlying set is
`{z : ℂ | abs (z - 0) = 1}`. This prevents certain algebraic facts from working definitionally --
for example, the circle is not defeq to `{z : ℂ | abs z = 1}`, which is the kernel of `Complex.abs`
considered as a homomorphism from `ℂ` to `ℝ`, nor is it defeq to `{z : ℂ | normSq z = 1}`, which
is the kernel of the homomorphism `Complex.normSq` from `ℂ` to `ℝ`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Complex Function Metric
open ComplexConjugate
/-- The unit circle in `ℂ`. -/
def Circle : Type := Submonoid.unitSphere ℂ
deriving TopologicalSpace
namespace Circle
variable {x y : Circle}
instance instCoeOut : CoeOut Circle ℂ := subtypeCoe
instance instCommGroup : CommGroup Circle := Metric.sphere.instCommGroup
instance instMetricSpace : MetricSpace Circle := Subtype.metricSpace
@[ext] lemma ext : (x : ℂ) = y → x = y := Subtype.ext
lemma coe_injective : Injective ((↑) : Circle → ℂ) := fun _ _ ↦ ext
-- Not simp because `SetLike.coe_eq_coe` already proves it
lemma coe_inj : (x : ℂ) = y ↔ x = y := coe_injective.eq_iff
lemma norm_coe (z : Circle) : ‖(z : ℂ)‖ = 1 := mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm.1 z.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_coe := norm_coe
@[simp] lemma normSq_coe (z : Circle) : normSq z = 1 := by simp [normSq_eq_norm_sq]
@[simp] lemma coe_ne_zero (z : Circle) : (z : ℂ) ≠ 0 := ne_zero_of_mem_unit_sphere z
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_one : ↑(1 : Circle) = (1 : ℂ) := rfl
-- Not simp because `OneMemClass.coe_eq_one` already proves it
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_eq_one : (x : ℂ) = 1 ↔ x = 1 := by rw [← coe_inj, coe_one]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_mul (z w : Circle) : ↑(z * w) = (z : ℂ) * w := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_inv (z : Circle) : ↑z⁻¹ = (z : ℂ)⁻¹ := rfl
lemma coe_inv_eq_conj (z : Circle) : ↑z⁻¹ = conj (z : ℂ) := by
rw [coe_inv, inv_def, normSq_coe, inv_one, ofReal_one, mul_one]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_div (z w : Circle) : ↑(z / w) = (z : ℂ) / w := rfl
/-- The coercion `Circle → ℂ` as a monoid homomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def coeHom : Circle →* ℂ where
toFun := (↑)
map_one' := coe_one
map_mul' := coe_mul
/-- The elements of the circle embed into the units. -/
def toUnits : Circle →* Units ℂ := unitSphereToUnits ℂ
-- written manually because `@[simps]` generated the wrong lemma
@[simp] lemma toUnits_apply (z : Circle) : toUnits z = Units.mk0 ↑z z.coe_ne_zero := rfl
instance : CompactSpace Circle := Metric.sphere.compactSpace _ _
instance : IsTopologicalGroup Circle := Metric.sphere.instIsTopologicalGroup
instance instUniformSpace : UniformSpace Circle := instUniformSpaceSubtype
instance : IsUniformGroup Circle := by
convert topologicalGroup_is_uniform_of_compactSpace Circle
exact unique_uniformity_of_compact rfl rfl
/-- If `z` is a nonzero complex number, then `conj z / z` belongs to the unit circle. -/
@[simps]
def ofConjDivSelf (z : ℂ) (hz : z ≠ 0) : Circle where
val := conj z / z
property := mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm.2 <| by
rw [norm_div, RCLike.norm_conj, div_self]; exact norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr hz
/-- The map `fun t => exp (t * I)` from `ℝ` to the unit circle in `ℂ`. -/
def exp : C(ℝ, Circle) where
toFun t := ⟨(t * I).exp, by simp [Submonoid.unitSphere, exp_mul_I, norm_cos_add_sin_mul_I]⟩
continuous_toFun := Continuous.subtype_mk (by fun_prop)
(by simp [Submonoid.unitSphere, exp_mul_I, norm_cos_add_sin_mul_I])
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_exp (t : ℝ) : exp t = Complex.exp (t * Complex.I) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem exp_zero : exp 0 = 1 :=
Subtype.ext <| by rw [coe_exp, ofReal_zero, zero_mul, Complex.exp_zero, coe_one]
@[simp]
theorem exp_add (x y : ℝ) : exp (x + y) = exp x * exp y :=
Subtype.ext <| by
simp only [coe_exp, Submonoid.coe_mul, ofReal_add, add_mul, Complex.exp_add, coe_mul]
/-- The map `fun t => exp (t * I)` from `ℝ` to the unit circle in `ℂ`,
considered as a homomorphism of groups. -/
@[simps]
def expHom : ℝ →+ Additive Circle where
toFun := Additive.ofMul ∘ exp
map_zero' := exp_zero
map_add' := exp_add
@[simp] lemma exp_sub (x y : ℝ) : exp (x - y) = exp x / exp y := expHom.map_sub x y
| @[simp] lemma exp_neg (x : ℝ) : exp (-x) = (exp x)⁻¹ := expHom.map_neg x
lemma exp_pi_ne_one : Circle.exp Real.pi ≠ 1 := by
| Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/Circle.lean | 136 | 138 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Antidiag.Finsupp
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Weight
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Eval
/-!
# Formal (multivariate) power series
This file defines multivariate formal power series
and develops the basic properties of these objects.
A formal power series is to a polynomial like an infinite sum is to a finite sum.
We provide the natural inclusion from multivariate polynomials to multivariate formal power series.
## Main definitions
- `MvPowerSeries.C`: constant power series
- `MvPowerSeries.X`: the indeterminates
- `MvPowerSeries.coeff`, `MvPowerSeries.constantCoeff`:
the coefficients of a `MvPowerSeries`, its constant coefficient
- `MvPowerSeries.monomial`: the monomials
- `MvPowerSeries.coeff_mul`: computes the coefficients of the product of two `MvPowerSeries`
- `MvPowerSeries.coeff_prod` : computes the coefficients of products of `MvPowerSeries`
- `MvPowerSeries.coeff_pow` : computes the coefficients of powers of a `MvPowerSeries`
- `MvPowerSeries.coeff_eq_zero_of_constantCoeff_nilpotent`: if the constant coefficient
of a `MvPowerSeries` is nilpotent, then some coefficients of its powers are automatically zero
- `MvPowerSeries.map`: apply a `RingHom` to the coefficients of a `MvPowerSeries` (as a `RingHom)
- `MvPowerSeries.X_pow_dvd_iff`, `MvPowerSeries.X_dvd_iff`: equivalent
conditions for (a power of) an indeterminate to divide a `MvPowerSeries`
- `MvPolynomial.toMvPowerSeries`: the canonical coercion from `MvPolynomial` to `MvPowerSeries`
## Note
This file sets up the (semi)ring structure on multivariate power series:
additional results are in:
* `Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPowerSeries.Inverse` : invertibility,
formal power series over a local ring form a local ring;
* `Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPowerSeries.Trunc`: truncation of power series.
In `Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Basic`, formal power series in one variable
will be obtained as a particular case, defined by
`PowerSeries R := MvPowerSeries Unit R`.
See that file for a specific description.
## Implementation notes
In this file we define multivariate formal power series with
variables indexed by `σ` and coefficients in `R` as
`MvPowerSeries σ R := (σ →₀ ℕ) → R`.
Unfortunately there is not yet enough API to show that they are the completion
of the ring of multivariate polynomials. However, we provide most of the infrastructure
that is needed to do this. Once I-adic completion (topological or algebraic) is available
it should not be hard to fill in the details.
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset (antidiagonal mem_antidiagonal)
/-- Multivariate formal power series, where `σ` is the index set of the variables
and `R` is the coefficient ring. -/
def MvPowerSeries (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) :=
(σ →₀ ℕ) → R
namespace MvPowerSeries
open Finsupp
variable {σ R : Type*}
instance [Inhabited R] : Inhabited (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
⟨fun _ => default⟩
instance [Zero R] : Zero (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.instZero
instance [AddMonoid R] : AddMonoid (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.addMonoid
instance [AddGroup R] : AddGroup (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.addGroup
instance [AddCommMonoid R] : AddCommMonoid (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.addCommMonoid
instance [AddCommGroup R] : AddCommGroup (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.addCommGroup
instance [Nontrivial R] : Nontrivial (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Function.nontrivial
instance {A} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid A] [Module R A] : Module R (MvPowerSeries σ A) :=
Pi.module _ _ _
instance {A S} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [AddCommMonoid A] [Module R A] [Module S A] [SMul R S]
[IsScalarTower R S A] : IsScalarTower R S (MvPowerSeries σ A) :=
Pi.isScalarTower
section Semiring
variable (R) [Semiring R]
/-- The `n`th monomial as multivariate formal power series:
it is defined as the `R`-linear map from `R` to the semi-ring
of multivariate formal power series associating to each `a`
the map sending `n : σ →₀ ℕ` to the value `a`
and sending all other `x : σ →₀ ℕ` different from `n` to `0`. -/
def monomial (n : σ →₀ ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] MvPowerSeries σ R :=
letI := Classical.decEq σ
LinearMap.single R (fun _ ↦ R) n
/-- The `n`th coefficient of a multivariate formal power series. -/
def coeff (n : σ →₀ ℕ) : MvPowerSeries σ R →ₗ[R] R :=
LinearMap.proj n
theorem coeff_apply (f : MvPowerSeries σ R) (d : σ →₀ ℕ) : coeff R d f = f d :=
rfl
variable {R}
/-- Two multivariate formal power series are equal if all their coefficients are equal. -/
@[ext]
theorem ext {φ ψ} (h : ∀ n : σ →₀ ℕ, coeff R n φ = coeff R n ψ) : φ = ψ :=
funext h
/-- Two multivariate formal power series are equal
if and only if all their coefficients are equal. -/
add_decl_doc MvPowerSeries.ext_iff
theorem monomial_def [DecidableEq σ] (n : σ →₀ ℕ) :
(monomial R n) = LinearMap.single R (fun _ ↦ R) n := by
rw [monomial]
-- unify the `Decidable` arguments
convert rfl
theorem coeff_monomial [DecidableEq σ] (m n : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) :
coeff R m (monomial R n a) = if m = n then a else 0 := by
dsimp only [coeff, MvPowerSeries]
rw [monomial_def, LinearMap.proj_apply (i := m), LinearMap.single_apply, Pi.single_apply]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_same (n : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) : coeff R n (monomial R n a) = a := by
classical
rw [monomial_def]
exact Pi.single_eq_same _ _
theorem coeff_monomial_ne {m n : σ →₀ ℕ} (h : m ≠ n) (a : R) : coeff R m (monomial R n a) = 0 := by
classical
rw [monomial_def]
exact Pi.single_eq_of_ne h _
theorem eq_of_coeff_monomial_ne_zero {m n : σ →₀ ℕ} {a : R} (h : coeff R m (monomial R n a) ≠ 0) :
m = n :=
by_contra fun h' => h <| coeff_monomial_ne h' a
@[simp]
theorem coeff_comp_monomial (n : σ →₀ ℕ) : (coeff R n).comp (monomial R n) = LinearMap.id :=
LinearMap.ext <| coeff_monomial_same n
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero (n : σ →₀ ℕ) : coeff R n (0 : MvPowerSeries σ R) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem eq_zero_iff_forall_coeff_zero {f : MvPowerSeries σ R} :
f = 0 ↔ (∀ d : σ →₀ ℕ, coeff R d f = 0) :=
MvPowerSeries.ext_iff
theorem ne_zero_iff_exists_coeff_ne_zero (f : MvPowerSeries σ R) :
f ≠ 0 ↔ (∃ d : σ →₀ ℕ, coeff R d f ≠ 0) := by
simp only [MvPowerSeries.ext_iff, ne_eq, coeff_zero, not_forall]
variable (m n : σ →₀ ℕ) (φ ψ : MvPowerSeries σ R)
instance : One (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
⟨monomial R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) 1⟩
theorem coeff_one [DecidableEq σ] : coeff R n (1 : MvPowerSeries σ R) = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_monomial _ _ _
theorem coeff_zero_one : coeff R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) 1 = 1 :=
coeff_monomial_same 0 1
theorem monomial_zero_one : monomial R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) 1 = 1 :=
rfl
instance : AddMonoidWithOne (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
{ show AddMonoid (MvPowerSeries σ R) by infer_instance with
natCast := fun n => monomial R 0 n
natCast_zero := by simp [Nat.cast]
natCast_succ := by simp [Nat.cast, monomial_zero_one]
one := 1 }
instance : Mul (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
letI := Classical.decEq σ
⟨fun φ ψ n => ∑ p ∈ antidiagonal n, coeff R p.1 φ * coeff R p.2 ψ⟩
theorem coeff_mul [DecidableEq σ] :
coeff R n (φ * ψ) = ∑ p ∈ antidiagonal n, coeff R p.1 φ * coeff R p.2 ψ := by
refine Finset.sum_congr ?_ fun _ _ => rfl
rw [Subsingleton.elim (Classical.decEq σ) ‹DecidableEq σ›]
protected theorem zero_mul : (0 : MvPowerSeries σ R) * φ = 0 :=
ext fun n => by classical simp [coeff_mul]
protected theorem mul_zero : φ * 0 = 0 :=
ext fun n => by classical simp [coeff_mul]
theorem coeff_monomial_mul (a : R) :
coeff R m (monomial R n a * φ) = if n ≤ m then a * coeff R (m - n) φ else 0 := by
classical
have :
∀ p ∈ antidiagonal m,
coeff R (p : (σ →₀ ℕ) × (σ →₀ ℕ)).1 (monomial R n a) * coeff R p.2 φ ≠ 0 → p.1 = n :=
fun p _ hp => eq_of_coeff_monomial_ne_zero (left_ne_zero_of_mul hp)
rw [coeff_mul, ← Finset.sum_filter_of_ne this, Finset.filter_fst_eq_antidiagonal _ n,
Finset.sum_ite_index]
simp only [Finset.sum_singleton, coeff_monomial_same, Finset.sum_empty]
theorem coeff_mul_monomial (a : R) :
coeff R m (φ * monomial R n a) = if n ≤ m then coeff R (m - n) φ * a else 0 := by
classical
have :
∀ p ∈ antidiagonal m,
coeff R (p : (σ →₀ ℕ) × (σ →₀ ℕ)).1 φ * coeff R p.2 (monomial R n a) ≠ 0 → p.2 = n :=
fun p _ hp => eq_of_coeff_monomial_ne_zero (right_ne_zero_of_mul hp)
rw [coeff_mul, ← Finset.sum_filter_of_ne this, Finset.filter_snd_eq_antidiagonal _ n,
Finset.sum_ite_index]
simp only [Finset.sum_singleton, coeff_monomial_same, Finset.sum_empty]
theorem coeff_add_monomial_mul (a : R) :
coeff R (m + n) (monomial R m a * φ) = a * coeff R n φ := by
rw [coeff_monomial_mul, if_pos, add_tsub_cancel_left]
exact le_add_right le_rfl
theorem coeff_add_mul_monomial (a : R) :
coeff R (m + n) (φ * monomial R n a) = coeff R m φ * a := by
rw [coeff_mul_monomial, if_pos, add_tsub_cancel_right]
exact le_add_left le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem commute_monomial {a : R} {n} :
Commute φ (monomial R n a) ↔ ∀ m, Commute (coeff R m φ) a := by
rw [commute_iff_eq, MvPowerSeries.ext_iff]
refine ⟨fun h m => ?_, fun h m => ?_⟩
· have := h (m + n)
rwa [coeff_add_mul_monomial, add_comm, coeff_add_monomial_mul] at this
· rw [coeff_mul_monomial, coeff_monomial_mul]
split_ifs <;> [apply h; rfl]
protected theorem one_mul : (1 : MvPowerSeries σ R) * φ = φ :=
ext fun n => by simpa using coeff_add_monomial_mul 0 n φ 1
protected theorem mul_one : φ * 1 = φ :=
ext fun n => by simpa using coeff_add_mul_monomial n 0 φ 1
protected theorem mul_add (φ₁ φ₂ φ₃ : MvPowerSeries σ R) : φ₁ * (φ₂ + φ₃) = φ₁ * φ₂ + φ₁ * φ₃ :=
ext fun n => by
classical simp only [coeff_mul, mul_add, Finset.sum_add_distrib, LinearMap.map_add]
protected theorem add_mul (φ₁ φ₂ φ₃ : MvPowerSeries σ R) : (φ₁ + φ₂) * φ₃ = φ₁ * φ₃ + φ₂ * φ₃ :=
ext fun n => by
classical simp only [coeff_mul, add_mul, Finset.sum_add_distrib, LinearMap.map_add]
protected theorem mul_assoc (φ₁ φ₂ φ₃ : MvPowerSeries σ R) : φ₁ * φ₂ * φ₃ = φ₁ * (φ₂ * φ₃) := by
ext1 n
classical
simp only [coeff_mul, Finset.sum_mul, Finset.mul_sum, Finset.sum_sigma']
apply Finset.sum_nbij' (fun ⟨⟨_i, j⟩, ⟨k, l⟩⟩ ↦ ⟨(k, l + j), (l, j)⟩)
(fun ⟨⟨i, _j⟩, ⟨k, l⟩⟩ ↦ ⟨(i + k, l), (i, k)⟩) <;> aesop (add simp [add_assoc, mul_assoc])
instance : Semiring (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (AddMonoidWithOne (MvPowerSeries σ R)),
inferInstanceAs (Mul (MvPowerSeries σ R)),
inferInstanceAs (AddCommMonoid (MvPowerSeries σ R)) with
mul_one := MvPowerSeries.mul_one
one_mul := MvPowerSeries.one_mul
mul_assoc := MvPowerSeries.mul_assoc
mul_zero := MvPowerSeries.mul_zero
zero_mul := MvPowerSeries.zero_mul
left_distrib := MvPowerSeries.mul_add
right_distrib := MvPowerSeries.add_mul }
end Semiring
instance [CommSemiring R] : CommSemiring (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
{ show Semiring (MvPowerSeries σ R) by infer_instance with
mul_comm := fun φ ψ =>
ext fun n => by
classical
simpa only [coeff_mul, mul_comm] using
sum_antidiagonal_swap n fun a b => coeff R a φ * coeff R b ψ }
instance [Ring R] : Ring (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (Semiring (MvPowerSeries σ R)),
inferInstanceAs (AddCommGroup (MvPowerSeries σ R)) with }
instance [CommRing R] : CommRing (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (CommSemiring (MvPowerSeries σ R)),
inferInstanceAs (AddCommGroup (MvPowerSeries σ R)) with }
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
theorem monomial_mul_monomial (m n : σ →₀ ℕ) (a b : R) :
monomial R m a * monomial R n b = monomial R (m + n) (a * b) := by
classical
ext k
simp only [coeff_mul_monomial, coeff_monomial]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₃ h₃ h₂ <;> try rfl
· rw [← h₂, tsub_add_cancel_of_le h₁] at h₃
exact (h₃ rfl).elim
· rw [h₃, add_tsub_cancel_right] at h₂
exact (h₂ rfl).elim
· exact zero_mul b
· rw [h₂] at h₁
exact (h₁ <| le_add_left le_rfl).elim
variable (σ) (R)
/-- The constant multivariate formal power series. -/
def C : R →+* MvPowerSeries σ R :=
{ monomial R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) with
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' := fun a b => (monomial_mul_monomial 0 0 a b).symm
map_zero' := (monomial R 0).map_zero }
variable {σ} {R}
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero_eq_C : ⇑(monomial R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ)) = C σ R :=
rfl
theorem monomial_zero_eq_C_apply (a : R) : monomial R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) a = C σ R a :=
rfl
theorem coeff_C [DecidableEq σ] (n : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) :
coeff R n (C σ R a) = if n = 0 then a else 0 :=
coeff_monomial _ _ _
theorem coeff_zero_C (a : R) : coeff R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) (C σ R a) = a :=
coeff_monomial_same 0 a
/-- The variables of the multivariate formal power series ring. -/
def X (s : σ) : MvPowerSeries σ R :=
monomial R (single s 1) 1
theorem coeff_X [DecidableEq σ] (n : σ →₀ ℕ) (s : σ) :
coeff R n (X s : MvPowerSeries σ R) = if n = single s 1 then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_monomial _ _ _
theorem coeff_index_single_X [DecidableEq σ] (s t : σ) :
coeff R (single t 1) (X s : MvPowerSeries σ R) = if t = s then 1 else 0 := by
simp only [coeff_X, single_left_inj (one_ne_zero : (1 : ℕ) ≠ 0)]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_index_single_self_X (s : σ) : coeff R (single s 1) (X s : MvPowerSeries σ R) = 1 :=
coeff_monomial_same _ _
theorem coeff_zero_X (s : σ) : coeff R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) (X s : MvPowerSeries σ R) = 0 := by
classical
rw [coeff_X, if_neg]
intro h
exact one_ne_zero (single_eq_zero.mp h.symm)
theorem commute_X (φ : MvPowerSeries σ R) (s : σ) : Commute φ (X s) :=
φ.commute_monomial.mpr fun _m => Commute.one_right _
theorem X_mul {φ : MvPowerSeries σ R} {s : σ} : X s * φ = φ * X s :=
φ.commute_X s |>.symm.eq
theorem commute_X_pow (φ : MvPowerSeries σ R) (s : σ) (n : ℕ) : Commute φ (X s ^ n) :=
φ.commute_X s |>.pow_right _
theorem X_pow_mul {φ : MvPowerSeries σ R} {s : σ} {n : ℕ} : X s ^ n * φ = φ * X s ^ n :=
φ.commute_X_pow s n |>.symm.eq
theorem X_def (s : σ) : X s = monomial R (single s 1) 1 :=
rfl
theorem X_pow_eq (s : σ) (n : ℕ) : (X s : MvPowerSeries σ R) ^ n = monomial R (single s n) 1 := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [pow_succ, ih, Finsupp.single_add, X, monomial_mul_monomial, one_mul]
theorem coeff_X_pow [DecidableEq σ] (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (s : σ) (n : ℕ) :
coeff R m ((X s : MvPowerSeries σ R) ^ n) = if m = single s n then 1 else 0 := by
rw [X_pow_eq s n, coeff_monomial]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mul_C (n : σ →₀ ℕ) (φ : MvPowerSeries σ R) (a : R) :
coeff R n (φ * C σ R a) = coeff R n φ * a := by simpa using coeff_add_mul_monomial n 0 φ a
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C_mul (n : σ →₀ ℕ) (φ : MvPowerSeries σ R) (a : R) :
coeff R n (C σ R a * φ) = a * coeff R n φ := by simpa using coeff_add_monomial_mul 0 n φ a
theorem coeff_zero_mul_X (φ : MvPowerSeries σ R) (s : σ) : coeff R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) (φ * X s) = 0 := by
have : ¬single s 1 ≤ 0 := fun h => by simpa using h s
simp only [X, coeff_mul_monomial, if_neg this]
theorem coeff_zero_X_mul (φ : MvPowerSeries σ R) (s : σ) : coeff R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) (X s * φ) = 0 := by
rw [← (φ.commute_X s).eq, coeff_zero_mul_X]
|
variable (σ) (R)
| Mathlib/RingTheory/MvPowerSeries/Basic.lean | 425 | 426 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.SmallSets
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousOn
/-!
# Basic results on uniform spaces
Uniform spaces are a generalization of metric spaces and topological groups.
## Main definitions
In this file we define a complete lattice structure on the type `UniformSpace X`
of uniform structures on `X`, as well as the pullback (`UniformSpace.comap`) of uniform structures
coming from the pullback of filters.
Like distance functions, uniform structures cannot be pushed forward in general.
## Notations
Localized in `Uniformity`, we have the notation `𝓤 X` for the uniformity on a uniform space `X`,
and `○` for composition of relations, seen as terms with type `Set (X × X)`.
## References
The formalization uses the books:
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
* [I. M. James, *Topologies and Uniformities*][james1999]
But it makes a more systematic use of the filter library.
-/
open Set Filter Topology
universe u v ua ub uc ud
/-!
### Relations, seen as `Set (α × α)`
-/
variable {α : Type ua} {β : Type ub} {γ : Type uc} {δ : Type ud} {ι : Sort*}
open Uniformity
section UniformSpace
variable [UniformSpace α]
/-- If `s ∈ 𝓤 α`, then for any natural `n`, for a subset `t` of a sufficiently small set in `𝓤 α`,
we have `t ○ t ○ ... ○ t ⊆ s` (`n` compositions). -/
theorem eventually_uniformity_iterate_comp_subset {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) (n : ℕ) :
∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, (t ○ ·)^[n] t ⊆ s := by
suffices ∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, t ⊆ s ∧ (t ○ ·)^[n] t ⊆ s from (eventually_and.1 this).2
induction n generalizing s with
| zero => simpa
| succ _ ihn =>
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs with ⟨t, htU, hts⟩
refine (ihn htU).mono fun U hU => ?_
rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply']
exact
⟨hU.1.trans <| (subset_comp_self <| refl_le_uniformity htU).trans hts,
(compRel_mono hU.1 hU.2).trans hts⟩
/-- If `s ∈ 𝓤 α`, then for a subset `t` of a sufficiently small set in `𝓤 α`,
we have `t ○ t ⊆ s`. -/
theorem eventually_uniformity_comp_subset {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, t ○ t ⊆ s :=
eventually_uniformity_iterate_comp_subset hs 1
/-!
### Balls in uniform spaces
-/
namespace UniformSpace
open UniformSpace (ball)
lemma isOpen_ball (x : α) {V : Set (α × α)} (hV : IsOpen V) : IsOpen (ball x V) :=
hV.preimage <| .prodMk_right _
lemma isClosed_ball (x : α) {V : Set (α × α)} (hV : IsClosed V) : IsClosed (ball x V) :=
hV.preimage <| .prodMk_right _
/-!
### Neighborhoods in uniform spaces
-/
theorem hasBasis_nhds_prod (x y : α) :
HasBasis (𝓝 (x, y)) (fun s => s ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsSymmetricRel s) fun s => ball x s ×ˢ ball y s := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
apply (hasBasis_nhds x).prod_same_index (hasBasis_nhds y)
rintro U V ⟨U_in, U_symm⟩ ⟨V_in, V_symm⟩
exact
⟨U ∩ V, ⟨(𝓤 α).inter_sets U_in V_in, U_symm.inter V_symm⟩, ball_inter_left x U V,
ball_inter_right y U V⟩
end UniformSpace
open UniformSpace
theorem nhds_eq_uniformity_prod {a b : α} :
𝓝 (a, b) =
(𝓤 α).lift' fun s : Set (α × α) => { y : α | (y, a) ∈ s } ×ˢ { y : α | (b, y) ∈ s } := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq, nhds_nhds_eq_uniformity_uniformity_prod, lift_lift'_same_eq_lift']
· exact fun s => monotone_const.set_prod monotone_preimage
· refine fun t => Monotone.set_prod ?_ monotone_const
exact monotone_preimage (f := fun y => (y, a))
theorem nhdset_of_mem_uniformity {d : Set (α × α)} (s : Set (α × α)) (hd : d ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t : Set (α × α), IsOpen t ∧ s ⊆ t ∧
t ⊆ { p | ∃ x y, (p.1, x) ∈ d ∧ (x, y) ∈ s ∧ (y, p.2) ∈ d } := by
let cl_d := { p : α × α | ∃ x y, (p.1, x) ∈ d ∧ (x, y) ∈ s ∧ (y, p.2) ∈ d }
have : ∀ p ∈ s, ∃ t, t ⊆ cl_d ∧ IsOpen t ∧ p ∈ t := fun ⟨x, y⟩ hp =>
mem_nhds_iff.mp <|
show cl_d ∈ 𝓝 (x, y) by
rw [nhds_eq_uniformity_prod, mem_lift'_sets]
· exact ⟨d, hd, fun ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => ⟨x, y, ha, hp, hb⟩⟩
· exact fun _ _ h _ h' => ⟨h h'.1, h h'.2⟩
choose t ht using this
exact ⟨(⋃ p : α × α, ⋃ h : p ∈ s, t p h : Set (α × α)),
isOpen_iUnion fun p : α × α => isOpen_iUnion fun hp => (ht p hp).right.left,
fun ⟨a, b⟩ hp => by
simp only [mem_iUnion, Prod.exists]; exact ⟨a, b, hp, (ht (a, b) hp).right.right⟩,
iUnion_subset fun p => iUnion_subset fun hp => (ht p hp).left⟩
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem nhds_le_uniformity (x : α) : 𝓝 (x, x) ≤ 𝓤 α := by
intro V V_in
rcases comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets V_in with ⟨w, w_in, w_symm, w_sub⟩
have : ball x w ×ˢ ball x w ∈ 𝓝 (x, x) := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
exact prod_mem_prod (ball_mem_nhds x w_in) (ball_mem_nhds x w_in)
apply mem_of_superset this
rintro ⟨u, v⟩ ⟨u_in, v_in⟩
exact w_sub (mem_comp_of_mem_ball w_symm u_in v_in)
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem iSup_nhds_le_uniformity : ⨆ x : α, 𝓝 (x, x) ≤ 𝓤 α :=
iSup_le nhds_le_uniformity
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem nhdsSet_diagonal_le_uniformity : 𝓝ˢ (diagonal α) ≤ 𝓤 α :=
(nhdsSet_diagonal α).trans_le iSup_nhds_le_uniformity
section
variable (α)
theorem UniformSpace.has_seq_basis [IsCountablyGenerated <| 𝓤 α] :
∃ V : ℕ → Set (α × α), HasAntitoneBasis (𝓤 α) V ∧ ∀ n, IsSymmetricRel (V n) :=
let ⟨U, hsym, hbasis⟩ := (@UniformSpace.hasBasis_symmetric α _).exists_antitone_subbasis
⟨U, hbasis, fun n => (hsym n).2⟩
end
/-!
### Closure and interior in uniform spaces
-/
theorem closure_eq_uniformity (s : Set <| α × α) :
closure s = ⋂ V ∈ { V | V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsSymmetricRel V }, V ○ s ○ V := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp +contextual only
[mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis (UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds_prod x y), mem_iInter, mem_setOf_eq,
and_imp, mem_comp_comp, exists_prop, ← mem_inter_iff, inter_comm, Set.Nonempty]
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_closed :
HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsClosed V) id := by
refine Filter.hasBasis_self.2 fun t h => ?_
rcases comp_comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets h with ⟨w, w_in, w_symm, r⟩
refine ⟨closure w, mem_of_superset w_in subset_closure, isClosed_closure, ?_⟩
refine Subset.trans ?_ r
rw [closure_eq_uniformity]
apply iInter_subset_of_subset
apply iInter_subset
exact ⟨w_in, w_symm⟩
theorem uniformity_eq_uniformity_closure : 𝓤 α = (𝓤 α).lift' closure :=
Eq.symm <| uniformity_hasBasis_closed.lift'_closure_eq_self fun _ => And.right
theorem Filter.HasBasis.uniformity_closure {p : ι → Prop} {U : ι → Set (α × α)}
(h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p U) : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun i => closure (U i) :=
(@uniformity_eq_uniformity_closure α _).symm ▸ h.lift'_closure
/-- Closed entourages form a basis of the uniformity filter. -/
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_closure : HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α) closure :=
(𝓤 α).basis_sets.uniformity_closure
theorem closure_eq_inter_uniformity {t : Set (α × α)} : closure t = ⋂ d ∈ 𝓤 α, d ○ (t ○ d) :=
calc
closure t = ⋂ (V) (_ : V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsSymmetricRel V), V ○ t ○ V := closure_eq_uniformity t
_ = ⋂ V ∈ 𝓤 α, V ○ t ○ V :=
Eq.symm <|
UniformSpace.hasBasis_symmetric.biInter_mem fun _ _ hV =>
compRel_mono (compRel_mono hV Subset.rfl) hV
_ = ⋂ V ∈ 𝓤 α, V ○ (t ○ V) := by simp only [compRel_assoc]
theorem uniformity_eq_uniformity_interior : 𝓤 α = (𝓤 α).lift' interior :=
le_antisymm
(le_iInf₂ fun d hd => by
let ⟨s, hs, hs_comp⟩ := comp3_mem_uniformity hd
let ⟨t, ht, hst, ht_comp⟩ := nhdset_of_mem_uniformity s hs
have : s ⊆ interior d :=
calc
s ⊆ t := hst
_ ⊆ interior d :=
ht.subset_interior_iff.mpr fun x (hx : x ∈ t) =>
let ⟨x, y, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := ht_comp hx
hs_comp ⟨x, h₁, y, h₂, h₃⟩
have : interior d ∈ 𝓤 α := by filter_upwards [hs] using this
simp [this])
fun _ hs => ((𝓤 α).lift' interior).sets_of_superset (mem_lift' hs) interior_subset
theorem interior_mem_uniformity {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : interior s ∈ 𝓤 α := by
rw [uniformity_eq_uniformity_interior]; exact mem_lift' hs
theorem mem_uniformity_isClosed {s : Set (α × α)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : ∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, IsClosed t ∧ t ⊆ s :=
let ⟨t, ⟨ht_mem, htc⟩, hts⟩ := uniformity_hasBasis_closed.mem_iff.1 h
⟨t, ht_mem, htc, hts⟩
theorem isOpen_iff_isOpen_ball_subset {s : Set α} :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ V ∈ 𝓤 α, IsOpen V ∧ ball x V ⊆ s := by
rw [isOpen_iff_ball_subset]
constructor <;> intro h x hx
· obtain ⟨V, hV, hV'⟩ := h x hx
exact
⟨interior V, interior_mem_uniformity hV, isOpen_interior,
(ball_mono interior_subset x).trans hV'⟩
· obtain ⟨V, hV, -, hV'⟩ := h x hx
exact ⟨V, hV, hV'⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-18")] alias
isOpen_iff_open_ball_subset := isOpen_iff_isOpen_ball_subset
/-- The uniform neighborhoods of all points of a dense set cover the whole space. -/
theorem Dense.biUnion_uniformity_ball {s : Set α} {U : Set (α × α)} (hs : Dense s) (hU : U ∈ 𝓤 α) :
⋃ x ∈ s, ball x U = univ := by
refine iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => ?_
rcases hs.inter_nhds_nonempty (mem_nhds_right y hU) with ⟨x, hxs, hxy : (x, y) ∈ U⟩
exact ⟨x, hxs, hxy⟩
/-- The uniform neighborhoods of all points of a dense indexed collection cover the whole space. -/
lemma DenseRange.iUnion_uniformity_ball {ι : Type*} {xs : ι → α}
(xs_dense : DenseRange xs) {U : Set (α × α)} (hU : U ∈ uniformity α) :
⋃ i, UniformSpace.ball (xs i) U = univ := by
rw [← biUnion_range (f := xs) (g := fun x ↦ UniformSpace.ball x U)]
exact Dense.biUnion_uniformity_ball xs_dense hU
/-!
### Uniformity bases
-/
/-- Open elements of `𝓤 α` form a basis of `𝓤 α`. -/
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_open : HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsOpen V) id :=
hasBasis_self.2 fun s hs =>
⟨interior s, interior_mem_uniformity hs, isOpen_interior, interior_subset⟩
theorem Filter.HasBasis.mem_uniformity_iff {p : β → Prop} {s : β → Set (α × α)}
(h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) {t : Set (α × α)} :
t ∈ 𝓤 α ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ ∀ a b, (a, b) ∈ s i → (a, b) ∈ t :=
h.mem_iff.trans <| by simp only [Prod.forall, subset_def]
/-- Open elements `s : Set (α × α)` of `𝓤 α` such that `(x, y) ∈ s ↔ (y, x) ∈ s` form a basis
of `𝓤 α`. -/
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_open_symmetric :
HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsOpen V ∧ IsSymmetricRel V) id := by
simp only [← and_assoc]
refine uniformity_hasBasis_open.restrict fun s hs => ⟨symmetrizeRel s, ?_⟩
exact
⟨⟨symmetrize_mem_uniformity hs.1, IsOpen.inter hs.2 (hs.2.preimage continuous_swap)⟩,
symmetric_symmetrizeRel s, symmetrizeRel_subset_self s⟩
theorem comp_open_symm_mem_uniformity_sets {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, IsOpen t ∧ IsSymmetricRel t ∧ t ○ t ⊆ s := by
obtain ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs
obtain ⟨u, ⟨hu₁, hu₂, hu₃⟩, hu₄ : u ⊆ t⟩ := uniformity_hasBasis_open_symmetric.mem_iff.mp ht₁
exact ⟨u, hu₁, hu₂, hu₃, (compRel_mono hu₄ hu₄).trans ht₂⟩
end UniformSpace
open uniformity
section Constructions
instance : PartialOrder (UniformSpace α) :=
PartialOrder.lift (fun u => 𝓤[u]) fun _ _ => UniformSpace.ext
protected theorem UniformSpace.le_def {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} : u₁ ≤ u₂ ↔ 𝓤[u₁] ≤ 𝓤[u₂] := Iff.rfl
instance : InfSet (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨fun s =>
UniformSpace.ofCore
{ uniformity := ⨅ u ∈ s, 𝓤[u]
refl := le_iInf fun u => le_iInf fun _ => u.toCore.refl
symm := le_iInf₂ fun u hu =>
le_trans (map_mono <| iInf_le_of_le _ <| iInf_le _ hu) u.symm
comp := le_iInf₂ fun u hu =>
le_trans (lift'_mono (iInf_le_of_le _ <| iInf_le _ hu) <| le_rfl) u.comp }⟩
protected theorem UniformSpace.sInf_le {tt : Set (UniformSpace α)} {t : UniformSpace α}
(h : t ∈ tt) : sInf tt ≤ t :=
show ⨅ u ∈ tt, 𝓤[u] ≤ 𝓤[t] from iInf₂_le t h
protected theorem UniformSpace.le_sInf {tt : Set (UniformSpace α)} {t : UniformSpace α}
(h : ∀ t' ∈ tt, t ≤ t') : t ≤ sInf tt :=
show 𝓤[t] ≤ ⨅ u ∈ tt, 𝓤[u] from le_iInf₂ h
instance : Top (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨@UniformSpace.mk α ⊤ ⊤ le_top le_top fun x ↦ by simp only [nhds_top, comap_top]⟩
instance : Bot (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨{ toTopologicalSpace := ⊥
uniformity := 𝓟 idRel
symm := by simp [Tendsto]
comp := lift'_le (mem_principal_self _) <| principal_mono.2 id_compRel.subset
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity := fun s => by
let _ : TopologicalSpace α := ⊥; have := discreteTopology_bot α
simp [idRel] }⟩
instance : Min (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨fun u₁ u₂ =>
{ uniformity := 𝓤[u₁] ⊓ 𝓤[u₂]
symm := u₁.symm.inf u₂.symm
comp := (lift'_inf_le _ _ _).trans <| inf_le_inf u₁.comp u₂.comp
toTopologicalSpace := u₁.toTopologicalSpace ⊓ u₂.toTopologicalSpace
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity := fun _ ↦ by
rw [@nhds_inf _ u₁.toTopologicalSpace _, @nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ u₁,
@nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ u₂, comap_inf] }⟩
instance : CompleteLattice (UniformSpace α) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (PartialOrder (UniformSpace α)) with
sup := fun a b => sInf { x | a ≤ x ∧ b ≤ x }
le_sup_left := fun _ _ => UniformSpace.le_sInf fun _ ⟨h, _⟩ => h
le_sup_right := fun _ _ => UniformSpace.le_sInf fun _ ⟨_, h⟩ => h
sup_le := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => UniformSpace.sInf_le ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
le_inf := fun a _ _ h₁ h₂ => show a.uniformity ≤ _ from le_inf h₁ h₂
inf_le_left := fun a _ => show _ ≤ a.uniformity from inf_le_left
inf_le_right := fun _ b => show _ ≤ b.uniformity from inf_le_right
top := ⊤
le_top := fun a => show a.uniformity ≤ ⊤ from le_top
bot := ⊥
bot_le := fun u => u.toCore.refl
sSup := fun tt => sInf { t | ∀ t' ∈ tt, t' ≤ t }
le_sSup := fun _ _ h => UniformSpace.le_sInf fun _ h' => h' _ h
sSup_le := fun _ _ h => UniformSpace.sInf_le h
sInf := sInf
le_sInf := fun _ _ hs => UniformSpace.le_sInf hs
sInf_le := fun _ _ ha => UniformSpace.sInf_le ha }
theorem iInf_uniformity {ι : Sort*} {u : ι → UniformSpace α} : 𝓤[iInf u] = ⨅ i, 𝓤[u i] :=
iInf_range
theorem inf_uniformity {u v : UniformSpace α} : 𝓤[u ⊓ v] = 𝓤[u] ⊓ 𝓤[v] := rfl
lemma bot_uniformity : 𝓤[(⊥ : UniformSpace α)] = 𝓟 idRel := rfl
lemma top_uniformity : 𝓤[(⊤ : UniformSpace α)] = ⊤ := rfl
instance inhabitedUniformSpace : Inhabited (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨⊥⟩
instance inhabitedUniformSpaceCore : Inhabited (UniformSpace.Core α) :=
⟨@UniformSpace.toCore _ default⟩
instance [Subsingleton α] : Unique (UniformSpace α) where
uniq u := bot_unique <| le_principal_iff.2 <| by
rw [idRel, ← diagonal, diagonal_eq_univ]; exact univ_mem
/-- Given `f : α → β` and a uniformity `u` on `β`, the inverse image of `u` under `f`
is the inverse image in the filter sense of the induced function `α × α → β × β`.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev UniformSpace.comap (f : α → β) (u : UniformSpace β) : UniformSpace α where
uniformity := 𝓤[u].comap fun p : α × α => (f p.1, f p.2)
symm := by
simp only [tendsto_comap_iff, Prod.swap, (· ∘ ·)]
exact tendsto_swap_uniformity.comp tendsto_comap
comp := le_trans
(by
rw [comap_lift'_eq, comap_lift'_eq2]
· exact lift'_mono' fun s _ ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨x, h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨f x, h₁, h₂⟩
· exact monotone_id.compRel monotone_id)
(comap_mono u.comp)
toTopologicalSpace := u.toTopologicalSpace.induced f
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity x := by
simp only [nhds_induced, nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, comap_comap, Function.comp_def]
theorem uniformity_comap {_ : UniformSpace β} (f : α → β) :
𝓤[UniformSpace.comap f ‹_›] = comap (Prod.map f f) (𝓤 β) :=
rfl
lemma ball_preimage {f : α → β} {U : Set (β × β)} {x : α} :
UniformSpace.ball x (Prod.map f f ⁻¹' U) = f ⁻¹' UniformSpace.ball (f x) U := by
ext : 1
simp only [UniformSpace.ball, mem_preimage, Prod.map_apply]
@[simp]
theorem uniformSpace_comap_id {α : Type*} : UniformSpace.comap (id : α → α) = id := by
ext : 2
rw [uniformity_comap, Prod.map_id, comap_id]
theorem UniformSpace.comap_comap {α β γ} {uγ : UniformSpace γ} {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} :
UniformSpace.comap (g ∘ f) uγ = UniformSpace.comap f (UniformSpace.comap g uγ) := by
ext1
simp only [uniformity_comap, Filter.comap_comap, Prod.map_comp_map]
theorem UniformSpace.comap_inf {α γ} {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace γ} {f : α → γ} :
(u₁ ⊓ u₂).comap f = u₁.comap f ⊓ u₂.comap f :=
UniformSpace.ext Filter.comap_inf
theorem UniformSpace.comap_iInf {ι α γ} {u : ι → UniformSpace γ} {f : α → γ} :
(⨅ i, u i).comap f = ⨅ i, (u i).comap f := by
ext : 1
simp [uniformity_comap, iInf_uniformity]
theorem UniformSpace.comap_mono {α γ} {f : α → γ} :
Monotone fun u : UniformSpace γ => u.comap f := fun _ _ hu =>
Filter.comap_mono hu
theorem uniformContinuous_iff {α β} {uα : UniformSpace α} {uβ : UniformSpace β} {f : α → β} :
UniformContinuous f ↔ uα ≤ uβ.comap f :=
Filter.map_le_iff_le_comap
theorem le_iff_uniformContinuous_id {u v : UniformSpace α} :
u ≤ v ↔ @UniformContinuous _ _ u v id := by
rw [uniformContinuous_iff, uniformSpace_comap_id, id]
theorem uniformContinuous_comap {f : α → β} [u : UniformSpace β] :
@UniformContinuous α β (UniformSpace.comap f u) u f :=
tendsto_comap
theorem uniformContinuous_comap' {f : γ → β} {g : α → γ} [v : UniformSpace β] [u : UniformSpace α]
(h : UniformContinuous (f ∘ g)) : @UniformContinuous α γ u (UniformSpace.comap f v) g :=
tendsto_comap_iff.2 h
namespace UniformSpace
theorem to_nhds_mono {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} (h : u₁ ≤ u₂) (a : α) :
@nhds _ (@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₁) a ≤
@nhds _ (@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₂) a := by
rw [@nhds_eq_uniformity α u₁ a, @nhds_eq_uniformity α u₂ a]; exact lift'_mono h le_rfl
theorem toTopologicalSpace_mono {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} (h : u₁ ≤ u₂) :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₁ ≤ @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₂ :=
le_of_nhds_le_nhds <| to_nhds_mono h
theorem toTopologicalSpace_comap {f : α → β} {u : UniformSpace β} :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ (UniformSpace.comap f u) =
TopologicalSpace.induced f (@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace β u) :=
rfl
lemma uniformSpace_eq_bot {u : UniformSpace α} : u = ⊥ ↔ idRel ∈ 𝓤[u] :=
le_bot_iff.symm.trans le_principal_iff
protected lemma _root_.Filter.HasBasis.uniformSpace_eq_bot {ι p} {s : ι → Set (α × α)}
{u : UniformSpace α} (h : 𝓤[u].HasBasis p s) :
u = ⊥ ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ Pairwise fun x y : α ↦ (x, y) ∉ s i := by
simp [uniformSpace_eq_bot, h.mem_iff, subset_def, Pairwise, not_imp_not]
theorem toTopologicalSpace_bot : @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace α ⊥ = ⊥ := rfl
theorem toTopologicalSpace_top : @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace α ⊤ = ⊤ := rfl
theorem toTopologicalSpace_iInf {ι : Sort*} {u : ι → UniformSpace α} :
(iInf u).toTopologicalSpace = ⨅ i, (u i).toTopologicalSpace :=
TopologicalSpace.ext_nhds fun a ↦ by simp only [@nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ (iInf u), nhds_iInf,
iInf_uniformity, @nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ (u _), Filter.comap_iInf]
theorem toTopologicalSpace_sInf {s : Set (UniformSpace α)} :
(sInf s).toTopologicalSpace = ⨅ i ∈ s, @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace α i := by
rw [sInf_eq_iInf]
simp only [← toTopologicalSpace_iInf]
theorem toTopologicalSpace_inf {u v : UniformSpace α} :
(u ⊓ v).toTopologicalSpace = u.toTopologicalSpace ⊓ v.toTopologicalSpace :=
rfl
end UniformSpace
theorem UniformContinuous.continuous [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) : Continuous f :=
continuous_iff_le_induced.mpr <| UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace_mono <|
uniformContinuous_iff.1 hf
/-- Uniform space structure on `ULift α`. -/
instance ULift.uniformSpace [UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace (ULift α) :=
UniformSpace.comap ULift.down ‹_›
/-- Uniform space structure on `αᵒᵈ`. -/
instance OrderDual.instUniformSpace [UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace (αᵒᵈ) :=
‹UniformSpace α›
section UniformContinuousInfi
-- TODO: add an `iff` lemma?
theorem UniformContinuous.inf_rng {f : α → β} {u₁ : UniformSpace α} {u₂ u₃ : UniformSpace β}
(h₁ : UniformContinuous[u₁, u₂] f) (h₂ : UniformContinuous[u₁, u₃] f) :
UniformContinuous[u₁, u₂ ⊓ u₃] f :=
tendsto_inf.mpr ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
theorem UniformContinuous.inf_dom_left {f : α → β} {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} {u₃ : UniformSpace β}
(hf : UniformContinuous[u₁, u₃] f) : UniformContinuous[u₁ ⊓ u₂, u₃] f :=
tendsto_inf_left hf
theorem UniformContinuous.inf_dom_right {f : α → β} {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} {u₃ : UniformSpace β}
(hf : UniformContinuous[u₂, u₃] f) : UniformContinuous[u₁ ⊓ u₂, u₃] f :=
tendsto_inf_right hf
theorem uniformContinuous_sInf_dom {f : α → β} {u₁ : Set (UniformSpace α)} {u₂ : UniformSpace β}
{u : UniformSpace α} (h₁ : u ∈ u₁) (hf : UniformContinuous[u, u₂] f) :
UniformContinuous[sInf u₁, u₂] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [sInf_eq_iInf', iInf_uniformity]
exact tendsto_iInf' ⟨u, h₁⟩ hf
theorem uniformContinuous_sInf_rng {f : α → β} {u₁ : UniformSpace α} {u₂ : Set (UniformSpace β)} :
UniformContinuous[u₁, sInf u₂] f ↔ ∀ u ∈ u₂, UniformContinuous[u₁, u] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [sInf_eq_iInf', iInf_uniformity, tendsto_iInf, SetCoe.forall]
theorem uniformContinuous_iInf_dom {f : α → β} {u₁ : ι → UniformSpace α} {u₂ : UniformSpace β}
{i : ι} (hf : UniformContinuous[u₁ i, u₂] f) : UniformContinuous[iInf u₁, u₂] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [iInf_uniformity]
exact tendsto_iInf' i hf
theorem uniformContinuous_iInf_rng {f : α → β} {u₁ : UniformSpace α} {u₂ : ι → UniformSpace β} :
UniformContinuous[u₁, iInf u₂] f ↔ ∀ i, UniformContinuous[u₁, u₂ i] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [iInf_uniformity, tendsto_iInf]
end UniformContinuousInfi
/-- A uniform space with the discrete uniformity has the discrete topology. -/
theorem discreteTopology_of_discrete_uniformity [hα : UniformSpace α] (h : uniformity α = 𝓟 idRel) :
DiscreteTopology α :=
⟨(UniformSpace.ext h.symm : ⊥ = hα) ▸ rfl⟩
instance : UniformSpace Empty := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace PUnit := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace Bool := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace ℕ := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace ℤ := ⊥
section
variable [UniformSpace α]
open Additive Multiplicative
instance : UniformSpace (Additive α) := ‹UniformSpace α›
instance : UniformSpace (Multiplicative α) := ‹UniformSpace α›
theorem uniformContinuous_ofMul : UniformContinuous (ofMul : α → Additive α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformContinuous_toMul : UniformContinuous (toMul : Additive α → α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformContinuous_ofAdd : UniformContinuous (ofAdd : α → Multiplicative α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformContinuous_toAdd : UniformContinuous (toAdd : Multiplicative α → α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformity_additive : 𝓤 (Additive α) = (𝓤 α).map (Prod.map ofMul ofMul) := rfl
theorem uniformity_multiplicative : 𝓤 (Multiplicative α) = (𝓤 α).map (Prod.map ofAdd ofAdd) := rfl
end
instance instUniformSpaceSubtype {p : α → Prop} [t : UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace (Subtype p) :=
UniformSpace.comap Subtype.val t
theorem uniformity_subtype {p : α → Prop} [UniformSpace α] :
𝓤 (Subtype p) = comap (fun q : Subtype p × Subtype p => (q.1.1, q.2.1)) (𝓤 α) :=
rfl
theorem uniformity_setCoe {s : Set α} [UniformSpace α] :
𝓤 s = comap (Prod.map ((↑) : s → α) ((↑) : s → α)) (𝓤 α) :=
rfl
theorem map_uniformity_set_coe {s : Set α} [UniformSpace α] :
map (Prod.map (↑) (↑)) (𝓤 s) = 𝓤 α ⊓ 𝓟 (s ×ˢ s) := by
rw [uniformity_setCoe, map_comap, range_prodMap, Subtype.range_val]
theorem uniformContinuous_subtype_val {p : α → Prop} [UniformSpace α] :
UniformContinuous (Subtype.val : { a : α // p a } → α) :=
uniformContinuous_comap
theorem UniformContinuous.subtype_mk {p : α → Prop} [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : β → α}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) (h : ∀ x, p (f x)) :
UniformContinuous (fun x => ⟨f x, h x⟩ : β → Subtype p) :=
uniformContinuous_comap' hf
theorem uniformContinuousOn_iff_restrict [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
UniformContinuousOn f s ↔ UniformContinuous (s.restrict f) := by
delta UniformContinuousOn UniformContinuous
rw [← map_uniformity_set_coe, tendsto_map'_iff]; rfl
theorem tendsto_of_uniformContinuous_subtype [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β}
{s : Set α} {a : α} (hf : UniformContinuous fun x : s => f x.val) (ha : s ∈ 𝓝 a) :
Tendsto f (𝓝 a) (𝓝 (f a)) := by
rw [(@map_nhds_subtype_coe_eq_nhds α _ s a (mem_of_mem_nhds ha) ha).symm]
exact tendsto_map' hf.continuous.continuousAt
theorem UniformContinuousOn.continuousOn [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α}
(h : UniformContinuousOn f s) : ContinuousOn f s := by
rw [uniformContinuousOn_iff_restrict] at h
rw [continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict]
exact h.continuous
@[to_additive]
instance [UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace αᵐᵒᵖ :=
UniformSpace.comap MulOpposite.unop ‹_›
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformity_mulOpposite [UniformSpace α] :
𝓤 αᵐᵒᵖ = comap (fun q : αᵐᵒᵖ × αᵐᵒᵖ => (q.1.unop, q.2.unop)) (𝓤 α) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem comap_uniformity_mulOpposite [UniformSpace α] :
comap (fun p : α × α => (MulOpposite.op p.1, MulOpposite.op p.2)) (𝓤 αᵐᵒᵖ) = 𝓤 α := by
simpa [uniformity_mulOpposite, comap_comap, (· ∘ ·)] using comap_id
namespace MulOpposite
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformContinuous_unop [UniformSpace α] : UniformContinuous (unop : αᵐᵒᵖ → α) :=
uniformContinuous_comap
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformContinuous_op [UniformSpace α] : UniformContinuous (op : α → αᵐᵒᵖ) :=
uniformContinuous_comap' uniformContinuous_id
end MulOpposite
section Prod
open UniformSpace
/- a similar product space is possible on the function space (uniformity of pointwise convergence),
but we want to have the uniformity of uniform convergence on function spaces -/
instance instUniformSpaceProd [u₁ : UniformSpace α] [u₂ : UniformSpace β] : UniformSpace (α × β) :=
u₁.comap Prod.fst ⊓ u₂.comap Prod.snd
-- check the above produces no diamond for `simp` and typeclass search
example [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
(instTopologicalSpaceProd : TopologicalSpace (α × β)) = UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace := by
with_reducible_and_instances rfl
theorem uniformity_prod [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
𝓤 (α × β) =
((𝓤 α).comap fun p : (α × β) × α × β => (p.1.1, p.2.1)) ⊓
(𝓤 β).comap fun p : (α × β) × α × β => (p.1.2, p.2.2) :=
rfl
instance [UniformSpace α] [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 α)]
[UniformSpace β] [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 β)] : IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 (α × β)) := by
rw [uniformity_prod]
infer_instance
theorem uniformity_prod_eq_comap_prod [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
𝓤 (α × β) =
comap (fun p : (α × β) × α × β => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) (𝓤 α ×ˢ 𝓤 β) := by
simp_rw [uniformity_prod, prod_eq_inf, Filter.comap_inf, Filter.comap_comap, Function.comp_def]
theorem uniformity_prod_eq_prod [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
𝓤 (α × β) = map (fun p : (α × α) × β × β => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) (𝓤 α ×ˢ 𝓤 β) := by
rw [map_swap4_eq_comap, uniformity_prod_eq_comap_prod]
theorem mem_uniformity_of_uniformContinuous_invariant [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
{s : Set (β × β)} {f : α → α → β} (hf : UniformContinuous fun p : α × α => f p.1 p.2)
(hs : s ∈ 𝓤 β) : ∃ u ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ a b c, (a, b) ∈ u → (f a c, f b c) ∈ s := by
rw [UniformContinuous, uniformity_prod_eq_prod, tendsto_map'_iff] at hf
rcases mem_prod_iff.1 (mem_map.1 <| hf hs) with ⟨u, hu, v, hv, huvt⟩
exact ⟨u, hu, fun a b c hab => @huvt ((_, _), (_, _)) ⟨hab, refl_mem_uniformity hv⟩⟩
/-- An entourage of the diagonal in `α` and an entourage in `β` yield an entourage in `α × β`
once we permute coordinates. -/
def entourageProd (u : Set (α × α)) (v : Set (β × β)) : Set ((α × β) × α × β) :=
{((a₁, b₁),(a₂, b₂)) | (a₁, a₂) ∈ u ∧ (b₁, b₂) ∈ v}
theorem mem_entourageProd {u : Set (α × α)} {v : Set (β × β)} {p : (α × β) × α × β} :
p ∈ entourageProd u v ↔ (p.1.1, p.2.1) ∈ u ∧ (p.1.2, p.2.2) ∈ v := Iff.rfl
theorem entourageProd_mem_uniformity [t₁ : UniformSpace α] [t₂ : UniformSpace β] {u : Set (α × α)}
{v : Set (β × β)} (hu : u ∈ 𝓤 α) (hv : v ∈ 𝓤 β) :
entourageProd u v ∈ 𝓤 (α × β) := by
rw [uniformity_prod]; exact inter_mem_inf (preimage_mem_comap hu) (preimage_mem_comap hv)
theorem ball_entourageProd (u : Set (α × α)) (v : Set (β × β)) (x : α × β) :
ball x (entourageProd u v) = ball x.1 u ×ˢ ball x.2 v := by
ext p; simp only [ball, entourageProd, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_prod, Set.mem_preimage]
lemma IsSymmetricRel.entourageProd {u : Set (α × α)} {v : Set (β × β)}
(hu : IsSymmetricRel u) (hv : IsSymmetricRel v) :
IsSymmetricRel (entourageProd u v) :=
Set.ext fun _ ↦ and_congr hu.mk_mem_comm hv.mk_mem_comm
theorem Filter.HasBasis.uniformity_prod {ιa ιb : Type*} [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
{pa : ιa → Prop} {pb : ιb → Prop} {sa : ιa → Set (α × α)} {sb : ιb → Set (β × β)}
(ha : (𝓤 α).HasBasis pa sa) (hb : (𝓤 β).HasBasis pb sb) :
(𝓤 (α × β)).HasBasis (fun i : ιa × ιb ↦ pa i.1 ∧ pb i.2)
(fun i ↦ entourageProd (sa i.1) (sb i.2)) :=
(ha.comap _).inf (hb.comap _)
theorem entourageProd_subset [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
{s : Set ((α × β) × α × β)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 (α × β)) :
∃ u ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ v ∈ 𝓤 β, entourageProd u v ⊆ s := by
rcases (((𝓤 α).basis_sets.uniformity_prod (𝓤 β).basis_sets).mem_iff' s).1 h with ⟨w, hw⟩
use w.1, hw.1.1, w.2, hw.1.2, hw.2
theorem tendsto_prod_uniformity_fst [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
Tendsto (fun p : (α × β) × α × β => (p.1.1, p.2.1)) (𝓤 (α × β)) (𝓤 α) :=
le_trans (map_mono inf_le_left) map_comap_le
theorem tendsto_prod_uniformity_snd [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
Tendsto (fun p : (α × β) × α × β => (p.1.2, p.2.2)) (𝓤 (α × β)) (𝓤 β) :=
le_trans (map_mono inf_le_right) map_comap_le
theorem uniformContinuous_fst [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => p.1 :=
tendsto_prod_uniformity_fst
theorem uniformContinuous_snd [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => p.2 :=
tendsto_prod_uniformity_snd
variable [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] [UniformSpace γ]
theorem UniformContinuous.prodMk {f₁ : α → β} {f₂ : α → γ} (h₁ : UniformContinuous f₁)
(h₂ : UniformContinuous f₂) : UniformContinuous fun a => (f₁ a, f₂ a) := by
rw [UniformContinuous, uniformity_prod]
exact tendsto_inf.2 ⟨tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₁, tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₂⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias UniformContinuous.prod_mk := UniformContinuous.prodMk
theorem UniformContinuous.prodMk_left {f : α × β → γ} (h : UniformContinuous f) (b) :
UniformContinuous fun a => f (a, b) :=
h.comp (uniformContinuous_id.prodMk uniformContinuous_const)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias UniformContinuous.prod_mk_left := UniformContinuous.prodMk_left
theorem UniformContinuous.prodMk_right {f : α × β → γ} (h : UniformContinuous f) (a) :
UniformContinuous fun b => f (a, b) :=
h.comp (uniformContinuous_const.prodMk uniformContinuous_id)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias UniformContinuous.prod_mk_right := UniformContinuous.prodMk_right
theorem UniformContinuous.prodMap [UniformSpace δ] {f : α → γ} {g : β → δ}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) (hg : UniformContinuous g) : UniformContinuous (Prod.map f g) :=
(hf.comp uniformContinuous_fst).prodMk (hg.comp uniformContinuous_snd)
theorem toTopologicalSpace_prod {α} {β} [u : UniformSpace α] [v : UniformSpace β] :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace (α × β) instUniformSpaceProd =
@instTopologicalSpaceProd α β u.toTopologicalSpace v.toTopologicalSpace :=
rfl
/-- A version of `UniformContinuous.inf_dom_left` for binary functions -/
theorem uniformContinuous_inf_dom_left₂ {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {ua1 ua2 : UniformSpace α}
{ub1 ub2 : UniformSpace β} {uc1 : UniformSpace γ}
(h : by haveI := ua1; haveI := ub1; exact UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := ua1 ⊓ ua2; haveI := ub1 ⊓ ub2
exact UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2 := by
-- proof essentially copied from `continuous_inf_dom_left₂`
have ha := @UniformContinuous.inf_dom_left _ _ id ua1 ua2 ua1 (@uniformContinuous_id _ (id _))
have hb := @UniformContinuous.inf_dom_left _ _ id ub1 ub2 ub1 (@uniformContinuous_id _ (id _))
have h_unif_cont_id :=
@UniformContinuous.prodMap _ _ _ _ (ua1 ⊓ ua2) (ub1 ⊓ ub2) ua1 ub1 _ _ ha hb
exact @UniformContinuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ h h_unif_cont_id
/-- A version of `UniformContinuous.inf_dom_right` for binary functions -/
theorem uniformContinuous_inf_dom_right₂ {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {ua1 ua2 : UniformSpace α}
{ub1 ub2 : UniformSpace β} {uc1 : UniformSpace γ}
(h : by haveI := ua2; haveI := ub2; exact UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := ua1 ⊓ ua2; haveI := ub1 ⊓ ub2
exact UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2 := by
-- proof essentially copied from `continuous_inf_dom_right₂`
have ha := @UniformContinuous.inf_dom_right _ _ id ua1 ua2 ua2 (@uniformContinuous_id _ (id _))
have hb := @UniformContinuous.inf_dom_right _ _ id ub1 ub2 ub2 (@uniformContinuous_id _ (id _))
have h_unif_cont_id :=
@UniformContinuous.prodMap _ _ _ _ (ua1 ⊓ ua2) (ub1 ⊓ ub2) ua2 ub2 _ _ ha hb
exact @UniformContinuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ h h_unif_cont_id
/-- A version of `uniformContinuous_sInf_dom` for binary functions -/
theorem uniformContinuous_sInf_dom₂ {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {uas : Set (UniformSpace α)}
{ubs : Set (UniformSpace β)} {ua : UniformSpace α} {ub : UniformSpace β} {uc : UniformSpace γ}
(ha : ua ∈ uas) (hb : ub ∈ ubs) (hf : UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := sInf uas; haveI := sInf ubs
exact @UniformContinuous _ _ _ uc fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2 := by
-- proof essentially copied from `continuous_sInf_dom`
let _ : UniformSpace (α × β) := instUniformSpaceProd
have ha := uniformContinuous_sInf_dom ha uniformContinuous_id
have hb := uniformContinuous_sInf_dom hb uniformContinuous_id
have h_unif_cont_id := @UniformContinuous.prodMap _ _ _ _ (sInf uas) (sInf ubs) ua ub _ _ ha hb
exact @UniformContinuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ hf h_unif_cont_id
end Prod
section
open UniformSpace Function
variable {δ' : Type*} [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] [UniformSpace γ] [UniformSpace δ]
[UniformSpace δ']
local notation f " ∘₂ " g => Function.bicompr f g
/-- Uniform continuity for functions of two variables. -/
def UniformContinuous₂ (f : α → β → γ) :=
UniformContinuous (uncurry f)
theorem uniformContinuous₂_def (f : α → β → γ) :
UniformContinuous₂ f ↔ UniformContinuous (uncurry f) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem UniformContinuous₂.uniformContinuous {f : α → β → γ} (h : UniformContinuous₂ f) :
UniformContinuous (uncurry f) :=
h
theorem uniformContinuous₂_curry (f : α × β → γ) :
UniformContinuous₂ (Function.curry f) ↔ UniformContinuous f := by
rw [UniformContinuous₂, uncurry_curry]
theorem UniformContinuous₂.comp {f : α → β → γ} {g : γ → δ} (hg : UniformContinuous g)
(hf : UniformContinuous₂ f) : UniformContinuous₂ (g ∘₂ f) :=
hg.comp hf
theorem UniformContinuous₂.bicompl {f : α → β → γ} {ga : δ → α} {gb : δ' → β}
(hf : UniformContinuous₂ f) (hga : UniformContinuous ga) (hgb : UniformContinuous gb) :
UniformContinuous₂ (bicompl f ga gb) :=
hf.uniformContinuous.comp (hga.prodMap hgb)
end
theorem toTopologicalSpace_subtype [u : UniformSpace α] {p : α → Prop} :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace (Subtype p) instUniformSpaceSubtype =
@instTopologicalSpaceSubtype α p u.toTopologicalSpace :=
rfl
section Sum
variable [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
open Sum
-- Obsolete auxiliary definitions and lemmas
/-- Uniformity on a disjoint union. Entourages of the diagonal in the union are obtained
by taking independently an entourage of the diagonal in the first part, and an entourage of
the diagonal in the second part. -/
instance Sum.instUniformSpace : UniformSpace (α ⊕ β) where
uniformity := map (fun p : α × α => (inl p.1, inl p.2)) (𝓤 α) ⊔
map (fun p : β × β => (inr p.1, inr p.2)) (𝓤 β)
symm := fun _ hs ↦ ⟨symm_le_uniformity hs.1, symm_le_uniformity hs.2⟩
comp := fun s hs ↦ by
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs.1 with ⟨tα, htα, Htα⟩
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs.2 with ⟨tβ, htβ, Htβ⟩
filter_upwards [mem_lift' (union_mem_sup (image_mem_map htα) (image_mem_map htβ))]
rintro ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨z, ⟨⟨a, b⟩, hab, ⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨⟨a, b⟩, hab, ⟨⟩⟩, ⟨⟨_, c⟩, hbc, ⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨⟨_, c⟩, hbc, ⟨⟩⟩⟩
exacts [@Htα (_, _) ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩, @Htβ (_, _) ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩]
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity x := by
ext
cases x <;> simp [mem_comap', -mem_comap, nhds_inl, nhds_inr, nhds_eq_comap_uniformity,
Prod.ext_iff]
/-- The union of an entourage of the diagonal in each set of a disjoint union is again an entourage
of the diagonal. -/
theorem union_mem_uniformity_sum {a : Set (α × α)} (ha : a ∈ 𝓤 α) {b : Set (β × β)} (hb : b ∈ 𝓤 β) :
Prod.map inl inl '' a ∪ Prod.map inr inr '' b ∈ 𝓤 (α ⊕ β) :=
union_mem_sup (image_mem_map ha) (image_mem_map hb)
theorem Sum.uniformity : 𝓤 (α ⊕ β) = map (Prod.map inl inl) (𝓤 α) ⊔ map (Prod.map inr inr) (𝓤 β) :=
rfl
lemma uniformContinuous_inl : UniformContinuous (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) := le_sup_left
lemma uniformContinuous_inr : UniformContinuous (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) := le_sup_right
instance [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 α)] [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 β)] :
IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 (α ⊕ β)) := by
rw [Sum.uniformity]
infer_instance
end Sum
end Constructions
/-!
### Expressing continuity properties in uniform spaces
We reformulate the various continuity properties of functions taking values in a uniform space
in terms of the uniformity in the target. Since the same lemmas (essentially with the same names)
also exist for metric spaces and emetric spaces (reformulating things in terms of the distance or
the edistance in the target), we put them in a namespace `Uniform` here.
In the metric and emetric space setting, there are also similar lemmas where one assumes that
both the source and the target are metric spaces, reformulating things in terms of the distance
on both sides. These lemmas are generally written without primes, and the versions where only
the target is a metric space is primed. We follow the same convention here, thus giving lemmas
with primes.
-/
namespace Uniform
variable [UniformSpace α]
theorem tendsto_nhds_right {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (a, u x)) f (𝓤 α) := by
rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
theorem tendsto_nhds_left {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (u x, a)) f (𝓤 α) := by
rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity', tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
theorem continuousAt_iff'_right [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} :
ContinuousAt f b ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f b, f x)) (𝓝 b) (𝓤 α) := by
rw [ContinuousAt, tendsto_nhds_right]
theorem continuousAt_iff'_left [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} :
ContinuousAt f b ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f x, f b)) (𝓝 b) (𝓤 α) := by
rw [ContinuousAt, tendsto_nhds_left]
theorem continuousAt_iff_prod [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} :
ContinuousAt f b ↔ Tendsto (fun x : β × β => (f x.1, f x.2)) (𝓝 (b, b)) (𝓤 α) :=
⟨fun H => le_trans (H.prodMap' H) (nhds_le_uniformity _), fun H =>
continuousAt_iff'_left.2 <| H.comp <| tendsto_id.prodMk_nhds tendsto_const_nhds⟩
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff'_right [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s b ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f b, f x)) (𝓝[s] b) (𝓤 α) := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhds_right]
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff'_left [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s b ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f x, f b)) (𝓝[s] b) (𝓤 α) := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhds_left]
theorem continuousOn_iff'_right [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, Tendsto (fun x => (f b, f x)) (𝓝[s] b) (𝓤 α) := by
simp [ContinuousOn, continuousWithinAt_iff'_right]
theorem continuousOn_iff'_left [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, Tendsto (fun x => (f x, f b)) (𝓝[s] b) (𝓤 α) := by
simp [ContinuousOn, continuousWithinAt_iff'_left]
theorem continuous_iff'_right [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ b, Tendsto (fun x => (f b, f x)) (𝓝 b) (𝓤 α) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => tendsto_nhds_right
theorem continuous_iff'_left [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ b, Tendsto (fun x => (f x, f b)) (𝓝 b) (𝓤 α) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => tendsto_nhds_left
/-- Consider two functions `f` and `g` which coincide on a set `s` and are continuous there.
Then there is an open neighborhood of `s` on which `f` and `g` are uniformly close. -/
lemma exists_is_open_mem_uniformity_of_forall_mem_eq
[TopologicalSpace β] {r : Set (α × α)} {s : Set β}
{f g : β → α} (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ContinuousAt f x) (hg : ∀ x ∈ s, ContinuousAt g x)
(hfg : s.EqOn f g) (hr : r ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t, IsOpen t ∧ s ⊆ t ∧ ∀ x ∈ t, (f x, g x) ∈ r := by
have A : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t, IsOpen t ∧ x ∈ t ∧ ∀ z ∈ t, (f z, g z) ∈ r := by
intro x hx
obtain ⟨t, ht, htsymm, htr⟩ := comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets hr
have A : {z | (f x, f z) ∈ t} ∈ 𝓝 x := (hf x hx).preimage_mem_nhds (mem_nhds_left (f x) ht)
have B : {z | (g x, g z) ∈ t} ∈ 𝓝 x := (hg x hx).preimage_mem_nhds (mem_nhds_left (g x) ht)
rcases _root_.mem_nhds_iff.1 (inter_mem A B) with ⟨u, hu, u_open, xu⟩
refine ⟨u, u_open, xu, fun y hy ↦ ?_⟩
have I1 : (f y, f x) ∈ t := (htsymm.mk_mem_comm).2 (hu hy).1
have I2 : (g x, g y) ∈ t := (hu hy).2
rw [hfg hx] at I1
exact htr (prodMk_mem_compRel I1 I2)
choose! t t_open xt ht using A
refine ⟨⋃ x ∈ s, t x, isOpen_biUnion t_open, fun x hx ↦ mem_biUnion hx (xt x hx), ?_⟩
rintro x hx
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨y, ys, hy⟩
exact ht y ys x hy
end Uniform
theorem Filter.Tendsto.congr_uniformity {α β} [UniformSpace β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} {b : β}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 b)) (hg : Tendsto (fun x => (f x, g x)) l (𝓤 β)) : Tendsto g l (𝓝 b) :=
Uniform.tendsto_nhds_right.2 <| (Uniform.tendsto_nhds_right.1 hf).uniformity_trans hg
theorem Uniform.tendsto_congr {α β} [UniformSpace β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} {b : β}
(hfg : Tendsto (fun x => (f x, g x)) l (𝓤 β)) : Tendsto f l (𝓝 b) ↔ Tendsto g l (𝓝 b) :=
⟨fun h => h.congr_uniformity hfg, fun h => h.congr_uniformity hfg.uniformity_symm⟩
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean | 1,980 | 2,003 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.NeZero
import Mathlib.Logic.Unique
import Mathlib.Tactic.Conv
/-!
# Groups with an adjoined zero element
This file describes structures that are not usually studied on their own right in mathematics,
namely a special sort of monoid: apart from a distinguished “zero element” they form a group,
or in other words, they are groups with an adjoined zero element.
Examples are:
* division rings;
* the value monoid of a multiplicative valuation;
* in particular, the non-negative real numbers.
## Main definitions
Various lemmas about `GroupWithZero` and `CommGroupWithZero`.
To reduce import dependencies, the type-classes themselves are in
`Algebra.GroupWithZero.Defs`.
## Implementation details
As is usual in mathlib, we extend the inverse function to the zero element,
and require `0⁻¹ = 0`.
-/
assert_not_exists DenselyOrdered
open Function
variable {M₀ G₀ : Type*}
section
section MulZeroClass
variable [MulZeroClass M₀] {a b : M₀}
theorem left_ne_zero_of_mul : a * b ≠ 0 → a ≠ 0 :=
mt fun h => mul_eq_zero_of_left h b
theorem right_ne_zero_of_mul : a * b ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 :=
mt (mul_eq_zero_of_right a)
theorem ne_zero_and_ne_zero_of_mul (h : a * b ≠ 0) : a ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ 0 :=
⟨left_ne_zero_of_mul h, right_ne_zero_of_mul h⟩
theorem mul_eq_zero_of_ne_zero_imp_eq_zero {a b : M₀} (h : a ≠ 0 → b = 0) : a * b = 0 := by
have : Decidable (a = 0) := Classical.propDecidable (a = 0)
exact if ha : a = 0 then by rw [ha, zero_mul] else by rw [h ha, mul_zero]
/-- To match `one_mul_eq_id`. -/
theorem zero_mul_eq_const : ((0 : M₀) * ·) = Function.const _ 0 :=
funext zero_mul
/-- To match `mul_one_eq_id`. -/
theorem mul_zero_eq_const : (· * (0 : M₀)) = Function.const _ 0 :=
funext mul_zero
end MulZeroClass
section Mul
variable [Mul M₀] [Zero M₀] [NoZeroDivisors M₀] {a b : M₀}
theorem eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero (h : a * a = 0) : a = 0 :=
(eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero h).elim id id
@[field_simps]
theorem mul_ne_zero (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) : a * b ≠ 0 :=
mt eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero <| not_or.mpr ⟨ha, hb⟩
end Mul
namespace NeZero
instance mul [Zero M₀] [Mul M₀] [NoZeroDivisors M₀] {x y : M₀} [NeZero x] [NeZero y] :
NeZero (x * y) :=
⟨mul_ne_zero out out⟩
end NeZero
end
section
variable [MulZeroOneClass M₀]
/-- In a monoid with zero, if zero equals one, then zero is the only element. -/
theorem eq_zero_of_zero_eq_one (h : (0 : M₀) = 1) (a : M₀) : a = 0 := by
rw [← mul_one a, ← h, mul_zero]
/-- In a monoid with zero, if zero equals one, then zero is the unique element.
Somewhat arbitrarily, we define the default element to be `0`.
All other elements will be provably equal to it, but not necessarily definitionally equal. -/
def uniqueOfZeroEqOne (h : (0 : M₀) = 1) : Unique M₀ where
default := 0
uniq := eq_zero_of_zero_eq_one h
/-- In a monoid with zero, zero equals one if and only if all elements of that semiring
are equal. -/
theorem subsingleton_iff_zero_eq_one : (0 : M₀) = 1 ↔ Subsingleton M₀ :=
⟨fun h => haveI := uniqueOfZeroEqOne h; inferInstance, fun h => @Subsingleton.elim _ h _ _⟩
alias ⟨subsingleton_of_zero_eq_one, _⟩ := subsingleton_iff_zero_eq_one
theorem eq_of_zero_eq_one (h : (0 : M₀) = 1) (a b : M₀) : a = b :=
@Subsingleton.elim _ (subsingleton_of_zero_eq_one h) a b
/-- In a monoid with zero, either zero and one are nonequal, or zero is the only element. -/
theorem zero_ne_one_or_forall_eq_0 : (0 : M₀) ≠ 1 ∨ ∀ a : M₀, a = 0 :=
not_or_of_imp eq_zero_of_zero_eq_one
end
section
variable [MulZeroOneClass M₀] [Nontrivial M₀] {a b : M₀}
theorem left_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one (h : a * b = 1) : a ≠ 0 :=
left_ne_zero_of_mul <| ne_zero_of_eq_one h
theorem right_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one (h : a * b = 1) : b ≠ 0 :=
right_ne_zero_of_mul <| ne_zero_of_eq_one h
end
section MonoidWithZero
variable [MonoidWithZero M₀] {a : M₀} {n : ℕ}
@[simp] lemma zero_pow : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n ≠ 0 → (0 : M₀) ^ n = 0
| n + 1, _ => by rw [pow_succ, mul_zero]
lemma zero_pow_eq (n : ℕ) : (0 : M₀) ^ n = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [h, pow_zero]
· rw [zero_pow h]
lemma zero_pow_eq_one₀ [Nontrivial M₀] : (0 : M₀) ^ n = 1 ↔ n = 0 := by
rw [zero_pow_eq, one_ne_zero.ite_eq_left_iff]
lemma pow_eq_zero_of_le : ∀ {m n}, m ≤ n → a ^ m = 0 → a ^ n = 0
| _, _, Nat.le.refl, ha => ha
| _, _, Nat.le.step hmn, ha => by rw [pow_succ, pow_eq_zero_of_le hmn ha, zero_mul]
lemma ne_zero_pow (hn : n ≠ 0) (ha : a ^ n ≠ 0) : a ≠ 0 := by rintro rfl; exact ha <| zero_pow hn
@[simp]
lemma zero_pow_eq_zero [Nontrivial M₀] : (0 : M₀) ^ n = 0 ↔ n ≠ 0 :=
⟨by rintro h rfl; simp at h, zero_pow⟩
lemma pow_mul_eq_zero_of_le {a b : M₀} {m n : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n)
(h : a ^ m * b = 0) : a ^ n * b = 0 := by
rw [show n = n - m + m by omega, pow_add, mul_assoc, h]
simp
variable [NoZeroDivisors M₀]
lemma pow_eq_zero : ∀ {n}, a ^ n = 0 → a = 0
| 0, ha => by simpa using congr_arg (a * ·) ha
| n + 1, ha => by rw [pow_succ, mul_eq_zero] at ha; exact ha.elim pow_eq_zero id
@[simp] lemma pow_eq_zero_iff (hn : n ≠ 0) : a ^ n = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
⟨pow_eq_zero, by rintro rfl; exact zero_pow hn⟩
lemma pow_ne_zero_iff (hn : n ≠ 0) : a ^ n ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 := (pow_eq_zero_iff hn).not
@[field_simps]
lemma pow_ne_zero (n : ℕ) (h : a ≠ 0) : a ^ n ≠ 0 := mt pow_eq_zero h
instance NeZero.pow [NeZero a] : NeZero (a ^ n) := ⟨pow_ne_zero n NeZero.out⟩
lemma sq_eq_zero_iff : a ^ 2 = 0 ↔ a = 0 := pow_eq_zero_iff two_ne_zero
@[simp] lemma pow_eq_zero_iff' [Nontrivial M₀] : a ^ n = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ n ≠ 0 := by
obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne n 0 <;> simp [*]
theorem exists_right_inv_of_exists_left_inv {α} [MonoidWithZero α]
(h : ∀ a : α, a ≠ 0 → ∃ b : α, b * a = 1) {a : α} (ha : a ≠ 0) : ∃ b : α, a * b = 1 := by
obtain _ | _ := subsingleton_or_nontrivial α
· exact ⟨a, Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := h a ha
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := h b (left_ne_zero_of_mul <| hb.trans_ne one_ne_zero)
refine ⟨b, ?_⟩
conv_lhs => rw [← one_mul (a * b), ← hc, mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc b, hb, one_mul, hc]
end MonoidWithZero
section CancelMonoidWithZero
variable [CancelMonoidWithZero M₀] {a b c : M₀}
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 10) CancelMonoidWithZero.to_noZeroDivisors : NoZeroDivisors M₀ :=
⟨fun ab0 => or_iff_not_imp_left.mpr fun ha => mul_left_cancel₀ ha <|
ab0.trans (mul_zero _).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_eq_mul_right_iff : a * c = b * c ↔ a = b ∨ c = 0 := by
by_cases hc : c = 0 <;> [simp only [hc, mul_zero, or_true]; simp [mul_left_inj', hc]]
@[simp]
theorem mul_eq_mul_left_iff : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c ∨ a = 0 := by
by_cases ha : a = 0 <;> [simp only [ha, zero_mul, or_true]; simp [mul_right_inj', ha]]
theorem mul_right_eq_self₀ : a * b = a ↔ b = 1 ∨ a = 0 :=
calc
a * b = a ↔ a * b = a * 1 := by rw [mul_one]
_ ↔ b = 1 ∨ a = 0 := mul_eq_mul_left_iff
theorem mul_left_eq_self₀ : a * b = b ↔ a = 1 ∨ b = 0 :=
calc
a * b = b ↔ a * b = 1 * b := by rw [one_mul]
_ ↔ a = 1 ∨ b = 0 := mul_eq_mul_right_iff
@[simp]
theorem mul_eq_left₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) : a * b = a ↔ b = 1 := by
rw [Iff.comm, ← mul_right_inj' ha, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem mul_eq_right₀ (hb : b ≠ 0) : a * b = b ↔ a = 1 := by
rw [Iff.comm, ← mul_left_inj' hb, one_mul]
@[simp]
theorem left_eq_mul₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) : a = a * b ↔ b = 1 := by rw [eq_comm, mul_eq_left₀ ha]
@[simp]
theorem right_eq_mul₀ (hb : b ≠ 0) : b = a * b ↔ a = 1 := by rw [eq_comm, mul_eq_right₀ hb]
/-- An element of a `CancelMonoidWithZero` fixed by right multiplication by an element other
than one must be zero. -/
theorem eq_zero_of_mul_eq_self_right (h₁ : b ≠ 1) (h₂ : a * b = a) : a = 0 :=
Classical.byContradiction fun ha => h₁ <| mul_left_cancel₀ ha <| h₂.symm ▸ (mul_one a).symm
/-- An element of a `CancelMonoidWithZero` fixed by left multiplication by an element other
than one must be zero. -/
theorem eq_zero_of_mul_eq_self_left (h₁ : b ≠ 1) (h₂ : b * a = a) : a = 0 :=
Classical.byContradiction fun ha => h₁ <| mul_right_cancel₀ ha <| h₂.symm ▸ (one_mul a).symm
end CancelMonoidWithZero
section GroupWithZero
variable [GroupWithZero G₀] {a b x : G₀}
theorem GroupWithZero.mul_right_injective (h : x ≠ 0) :
Function.Injective fun y => x * y := fun y y' w => by
simpa only [← mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel₀ h, one_mul] using congr_arg (fun y => x⁻¹ * y) w
theorem GroupWithZero.mul_left_injective (h : x ≠ 0) :
Function.Injective fun y => y * x := fun y y' w => by
simpa only [mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel₀ h, mul_one] using congr_arg (fun y => y * x⁻¹) w
@[simp]
theorem inv_mul_cancel_right₀ (h : b ≠ 0) (a : G₀) : a * b⁻¹ * b = a :=
calc
a * b⁻¹ * b = a * (b⁻¹ * b) := mul_assoc _ _ _
_ = a := by simp [h]
@[simp]
theorem inv_mul_cancel_left₀ (h : a ≠ 0) (b : G₀) : a⁻¹ * (a * b) = b :=
calc
a⁻¹ * (a * b) = a⁻¹ * a * b := (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm
_ = b := by simp [h]
private theorem inv_eq_of_mul (h : a * b = 1) : a⁻¹ = b := by
rw [← inv_mul_cancel_left₀ (left_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one h) b, h, mul_one]
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GroupWithZero.toDivisionMonoid : DivisionMonoid G₀ :=
{ ‹GroupWithZero G₀› with
inv := Inv.inv,
inv_inv := fun a => by
by_cases h : a = 0
· simp [h]
· exact left_inv_eq_right_inv (inv_mul_cancel₀ <| inv_ne_zero h) (inv_mul_cancel₀ h)
,
mul_inv_rev := fun a b => by
by_cases ha : a = 0
· simp [ha]
by_cases hb : b = 0
· simp [hb]
apply inv_eq_of_mul
simp [mul_assoc, ha, hb],
inv_eq_of_mul := fun _ _ => inv_eq_of_mul }
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 10) GroupWithZero.toCancelMonoidWithZero : CancelMonoidWithZero G₀ :=
{ (‹_› : GroupWithZero G₀) with
mul_left_cancel_of_ne_zero := @fun x y z hx h => by
rw [← inv_mul_cancel_left₀ hx y, h, inv_mul_cancel_left₀ hx z],
mul_right_cancel_of_ne_zero := @fun x y z hy h => by
rw [← mul_inv_cancel_right₀ hy x, h, mul_inv_cancel_right₀ hy z] }
end GroupWithZero
section GroupWithZero
variable [GroupWithZero G₀] {a : G₀}
@[simp]
theorem zero_div (a : G₀) : 0 / a = 0 := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, zero_mul]
@[simp]
theorem div_zero (a : G₀) : a / 0 = 0 := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_zero, mul_zero]
/-- Multiplying `a` by itself and then by its inverse results in `a`
(whether or not `a` is zero). -/
@[simp]
theorem mul_self_mul_inv (a : G₀) : a * a * a⁻¹ = a := by
by_cases h : a = 0
· rw [h, inv_zero, mul_zero]
· rw [mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel₀ h, mul_one]
/-- Multiplying `a` by its inverse and then by itself results in `a`
(whether or not `a` is zero). -/
@[simp]
theorem mul_inv_mul_cancel (a : G₀) : a * a⁻¹ * a = a := by
by_cases h : a = 0
· rw [h, inv_zero, mul_zero]
· rw [mul_inv_cancel₀ h, one_mul]
/-- Multiplying `a⁻¹` by `a` twice results in `a` (whether or not `a`
is zero). -/
@[simp]
theorem inv_mul_mul_self (a : G₀) : a⁻¹ * a * a = a := by
by_cases h : a = 0
· rw [h, inv_zero, mul_zero]
· rw [inv_mul_cancel₀ h, one_mul]
/-- Multiplying `a` by itself and then dividing by itself results in `a`, whether or not `a` is
zero. -/
@[simp]
theorem mul_self_div_self (a : G₀) : a * a / a = a := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_self_mul_inv a]
/-- Dividing `a` by itself and then multiplying by itself results in `a`, whether or not `a` is
zero. -/
@[simp]
theorem div_self_mul_self (a : G₀) : a / a * a = a := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_inv_mul_cancel a]
attribute [local simp] div_eq_mul_inv mul_comm mul_assoc mul_left_comm
@[simp]
theorem div_self_mul_self' (a : G₀) : a / (a * a) = a⁻¹ :=
calc
a / (a * a) = a⁻¹⁻¹ * a⁻¹ * a⁻¹ := by simp [mul_inv_rev]
_ = a⁻¹ := inv_mul_mul_self _
theorem one_div_ne_zero {a : G₀} (h : a ≠ 0) : 1 / a ≠ 0 := by
simpa only [one_div] using inv_ne_zero h
@[simp]
theorem inv_eq_zero {a : G₀} : a⁻¹ = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by rw [inv_eq_iff_eq_inv, inv_zero]
@[simp]
theorem zero_eq_inv {a : G₀} : 0 = a⁻¹ ↔ 0 = a :=
eq_comm.trans <| inv_eq_zero.trans eq_comm
/-- Dividing `a` by the result of dividing `a` by itself results in
`a` (whether or not `a` is zero). -/
@[simp]
theorem div_div_self (a : G₀) : a / (a / a) = a := by
rw [div_div_eq_mul_div]
exact mul_self_div_self a
theorem ne_zero_of_one_div_ne_zero {a : G₀} (h : 1 / a ≠ 0) : a ≠ 0 := fun ha : a = 0 => by
rw [ha, div_zero] at h
contradiction
| theorem eq_zero_of_one_div_eq_zero {a : G₀} (h : 1 / a = 0) : a = 0 :=
| Mathlib/Algebra/GroupWithZero/Basic.lean | 387 | 387 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.End
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Units
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.SubMulAction
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.OrderOfElement
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
/-!
# Integers mod `n`
Definition of the integers mod n, and the field structure on the integers mod p.
## Definitions
* `ZMod n`, which is for integers modulo a nat `n : ℕ`
* `val a` is defined as a natural number:
- for `a : ZMod 0` it is the absolute value of `a`
- for `a : ZMod n` with `0 < n` it is the least natural number in the equivalence class
* A coercion `cast` is defined from `ZMod n` into any ring.
This is a ring hom if the ring has characteristic dividing `n`
-/
assert_not_exists Field Submodule TwoSidedIdeal
open Function ZMod
namespace ZMod
/-- For non-zero `n : ℕ`, the ring `Fin n` is equivalent to `ZMod n`. -/
def finEquiv : ∀ (n : ℕ) [NeZero n], Fin n ≃+* ZMod n
| 0, h => (h.ne _ rfl).elim
| _ + 1, _ => .refl _
instance charZero : CharZero (ZMod 0) := inferInstanceAs (CharZero ℤ)
/-- `val a` is a natural number defined as:
- for `a : ZMod 0` it is the absolute value of `a`
- for `a : ZMod n` with `0 < n` it is the least natural number in the equivalence class
See `ZMod.valMinAbs` for a variant that takes values in the integers.
-/
def val : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ZMod n → ℕ
| 0 => Int.natAbs
| n + 1 => ((↑) : Fin (n + 1) → ℕ)
theorem val_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : a.val < n := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
exact Fin.is_lt a
theorem val_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : a.val ≤ n :=
a.val_lt.le
@[simp]
theorem val_zero : ∀ {n}, (0 : ZMod n).val = 0
| 0 => rfl
| _ + 1 => rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_one' : (1 : ZMod 0).val = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_neg' {n : ZMod 0} : (-n).val = n.val :=
Int.natAbs_neg n
@[simp]
theorem val_mul' {m n : ZMod 0} : (m * n).val = m.val * n.val :=
Int.natAbs_mul m n
@[simp]
theorem val_natCast (n a : ℕ) : (a : ZMod n).val = a % n := by
cases n
· rw [Nat.mod_zero]
exact Int.natAbs_natCast a
· apply Fin.val_natCast
lemma val_natCast_of_lt {n a : ℕ} (h : a < n) : (a : ZMod n).val = a := by
rwa [val_natCast, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
lemma val_ofNat (n a : ℕ) [a.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(a) : ZMod n).val = ofNat(a) % n := val_natCast ..
lemma val_ofNat_of_lt {n a : ℕ} [a.AtLeastTwo] (han : a < n) : (ofNat(a) : ZMod n).val = ofNat(a) :=
val_natCast_of_lt han
theorem val_unit' {n : ZMod 0} : IsUnit n ↔ n.val = 1 := by
simp only [val]
rw [Int.isUnit_iff, Int.natAbs_eq_iff, Nat.cast_one]
lemma eq_one_of_isUnit_natCast {n : ℕ} (h : IsUnit (n : ZMod 0)) : n = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.mod_zero n, ← val_natCast, val_unit'.mp h]
instance charP (n : ℕ) : CharP (ZMod n) n where
cast_eq_zero_iff := by
intro k
rcases n with - | n
· simp [zero_dvd_iff, Int.natCast_eq_zero]
· exact Fin.natCast_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_one (n : ℕ) : addOrderOf (1 : ZMod n) = n :=
CharP.eq _ (CharP.addOrderOf_one _) (ZMod.charP n)
/-- This lemma works in the case in which `ZMod n` is not infinite, i.e. `n ≠ 0`. The version
where `a ≠ 0` is `addOrderOf_coe'`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_coe (a : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (n0 : n ≠ 0) : addOrderOf (a : ZMod n) = n / n.gcd a := by
rcases a with - | a
· simp only [Nat.cast_zero, addOrderOf_zero, Nat.gcd_zero_right,
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero n0, Nat.div_self]
rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_nsmul' _ a.succ_ne_zero, ZMod.addOrderOf_one]
/-- This lemma works in the case in which `a ≠ 0`. The version where
`ZMod n` is not infinite, i.e. `n ≠ 0`, is `addOrderOf_coe`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_coe' {a : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (a0 : a ≠ 0) : addOrderOf (a : ZMod n) = n / n.gcd a := by
rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_nsmul' _ a0, ZMod.addOrderOf_one]
/-- We have that `ringChar (ZMod n) = n`. -/
theorem ringChar_zmod_n (n : ℕ) : ringChar (ZMod n) = n := by
rw [ringChar.eq_iff]
exact ZMod.charP n
theorem natCast_self (n : ℕ) : (n : ZMod n) = 0 :=
CharP.cast_eq_zero (ZMod n) n
@[simp]
theorem natCast_self' (n : ℕ) : (n + 1 : ZMod (n + 1)) = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_add_one, natCast_self (n + 1)]
section UniversalProperty
variable {n : ℕ} {R : Type*}
section
variable [AddGroupWithOne R]
/-- Cast an integer modulo `n` to another semiring.
This function is a morphism if the characteristic of `R` divides `n`.
See `ZMod.castHom` for a bundled version. -/
def cast : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ZMod n → R
| 0 => Int.cast
| _ + 1 => fun i => i.val
@[simp]
theorem cast_zero : (cast (0 : ZMod n) : R) = 0 := by
delta ZMod.cast
cases n
· exact Int.cast_zero
· simp
theorem cast_eq_val [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R) = a.val := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
rfl
variable {S : Type*} [AddGroupWithOne S]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.fst_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R × S).fst = cast a := by
cases n
· rfl
· simp [ZMod.cast]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.snd_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R × S).snd = cast a := by
cases n
· rfl
· simp [ZMod.cast]
end
/-- So-named because the coercion is `Nat.cast` into `ZMod`. For `Nat.cast` into an arbitrary ring,
see `ZMod.natCast_val`. -/
theorem natCast_zmod_val {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (a.val : ZMod n) = a := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
· apply Fin.cast_val_eq_self
theorem natCast_rightInverse [NeZero n] : Function.RightInverse val ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) :=
natCast_zmod_val
theorem natCast_zmod_surjective [NeZero n] : Function.Surjective ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) :=
natCast_rightInverse.surjective
/-- So-named because the outer coercion is `Int.cast` into `ZMod`. For `Int.cast` into an arbitrary
ring, see `ZMod.intCast_cast`. -/
@[norm_cast]
theorem intCast_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : ((cast a : ℤ) : ZMod n) = a := by
cases n
· simp [ZMod.cast, ZMod]
· dsimp [ZMod.cast]
rw [Int.cast_natCast, natCast_zmod_val]
theorem intCast_rightInverse : Function.RightInverse (cast : ZMod n → ℤ) ((↑) : ℤ → ZMod n) :=
intCast_zmod_cast
theorem intCast_surjective : Function.Surjective ((↑) : ℤ → ZMod n) :=
intCast_rightInverse.surjective
lemma «forall» {P : ZMod n → Prop} : (∀ x, P x) ↔ ∀ x : ℤ, P x := intCast_surjective.forall
lemma «exists» {P : ZMod n → Prop} : (∃ x, P x) ↔ ∃ x : ℤ, P x := intCast_surjective.exists
theorem cast_id : ∀ (n) (i : ZMod n), (ZMod.cast i : ZMod n) = i
| 0, _ => Int.cast_id
| _ + 1, i => natCast_zmod_val i
@[simp]
theorem cast_id' : (ZMod.cast : ZMod n → ZMod n) = id :=
funext (cast_id n)
variable (R) [Ring R]
/-- The coercions are respectively `Nat.cast` and `ZMod.cast`. -/
@[simp]
theorem natCast_comp_val [NeZero n] : ((↑) : ℕ → R) ∘ (val : ZMod n → ℕ) = cast := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
rfl
/-- The coercions are respectively `Int.cast`, `ZMod.cast`, and `ZMod.cast`. -/
@[simp]
theorem intCast_comp_cast : ((↑) : ℤ → R) ∘ (cast : ZMod n → ℤ) = cast := by
cases n
· exact congr_arg (Int.cast ∘ ·) ZMod.cast_id'
· ext
simp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem natCast_val [NeZero n] (i : ZMod n) : (i.val : R) = cast i :=
congr_fun (natCast_comp_val R) i
@[simp]
theorem intCast_cast (i : ZMod n) : ((cast i : ℤ) : R) = cast i :=
congr_fun (intCast_comp_cast R) i
theorem cast_add_eq_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) :
(cast (a + b) : ℤ) =
if (n : ℤ) ≤ cast a + cast b then (cast a + cast b - n : ℤ) else cast a + cast b := by
rcases n with - | n
· simp; rfl
change Fin (n + 1) at a b
change ((((a + b) : Fin (n + 1)) : ℕ) : ℤ) = if ((n + 1 : ℕ) : ℤ) ≤ (a : ℕ) + b then _ else _
simp only [Fin.val_add_eq_ite, Int.natCast_succ, Int.ofNat_le]
norm_cast
split_ifs with h
· rw [Nat.cast_sub h]
congr
· rfl
section CharDvd
/-! If the characteristic of `R` divides `n`, then `cast` is a homomorphism. -/
variable {m : ℕ} [CharP R m]
@[simp]
theorem cast_one (h : m ∣ n) : (cast (1 : ZMod n) : R) = 1 := by
rcases n with - | n
· exact Int.cast_one
show ((1 % (n + 1) : ℕ) : R) = 1
cases n
· rw [Nat.dvd_one] at h
subst m
subsingleton [CharP.CharOne.subsingleton]
rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
· exact Nat.cast_one
exact Nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ rfl
theorem cast_add (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a + b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a + cast b := by
cases n
· apply Int.cast_add
symm
dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [← Nat.cast_add, Fin.val_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← Nat.cast_sub (Nat.mod_le _ _),
@CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff R _ m]
exact h.trans (Nat.dvd_sub_mod _)
theorem cast_mul (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a * b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a * cast b := by
cases n
· apply Int.cast_mul
symm
dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [← Nat.cast_mul, Fin.val_mul, ← sub_eq_zero, ← Nat.cast_sub (Nat.mod_le _ _),
@CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff R _ m]
exact h.trans (Nat.dvd_sub_mod _)
/-- The canonical ring homomorphism from `ZMod n` to a ring of characteristic dividing `n`.
See also `ZMod.lift` for a generalized version working in `AddGroup`s.
-/
def castHom (h : m ∣ n) (R : Type*) [Ring R] [CharP R m] : ZMod n →+* R where
toFun := cast
map_zero' := cast_zero
map_one' := cast_one h
map_add' := cast_add h
map_mul' := cast_mul h
@[simp]
theorem castHom_apply {h : m ∣ n} (i : ZMod n) : castHom h R i = cast i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_sub (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a - b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a - cast b :=
(castHom h R).map_sub a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_neg (h : m ∣ n) (a : ZMod n) : (cast (-a : ZMod n) : R) = -(cast a) :=
(castHom h R).map_neg a
@[simp]
theorem cast_pow (h : m ∣ n) (a : ZMod n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (a ^ k : ZMod n) : R) = (cast a) ^ k :=
(castHom h R).map_pow a k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_natCast (h : m ∣ n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
map_natCast (castHom h R) k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_intCast (h : m ∣ n) (k : ℤ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
map_intCast (castHom h R) k
end CharDvd
section CharEq
/-! Some specialised simp lemmas which apply when `R` has characteristic `n`. -/
variable [CharP R n]
@[simp]
theorem cast_one' : (cast (1 : ZMod n) : R) = 1 :=
cast_one dvd_rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_add' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a + b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a + cast b :=
cast_add dvd_rfl a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_mul' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a * b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a * cast b :=
cast_mul dvd_rfl a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_sub' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a - b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a - cast b :=
cast_sub dvd_rfl a b
@[simp]
theorem cast_pow' (a : ZMod n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (a ^ k : ZMod n) : R) = (cast a : R) ^ k :=
cast_pow dvd_rfl a k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_natCast' (k : ℕ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
cast_natCast dvd_rfl k
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_intCast' (k : ℤ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
cast_intCast dvd_rfl k
variable (R)
theorem castHom_injective : Function.Injective (ZMod.castHom (dvd_refl n) R) := by
rw [injective_iff_map_eq_zero]
intro x
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := ZMod.intCast_surjective x
rw [map_intCast, CharP.intCast_eq_zero_iff R n, CharP.intCast_eq_zero_iff (ZMod n) n]
exact id
theorem castHom_bijective [Fintype R] (h : Fintype.card R = n) :
Function.Bijective (ZMod.castHom (dvd_refl n) R) := by
haveI : NeZero n :=
⟨by
intro hn
rw [hn] at h
exact (Fintype.card_eq_zero_iff.mp h).elim' 0⟩
rw [Fintype.bijective_iff_injective_and_card, ZMod.card, h, eq_self_iff_true, and_true]
apply ZMod.castHom_injective
/-- The unique ring isomorphism between `ZMod n` and a ring `R`
of characteristic `n` and cardinality `n`. -/
noncomputable def ringEquiv [Fintype R] (h : Fintype.card R = n) : ZMod n ≃+* R :=
RingEquiv.ofBijective _ (ZMod.castHom_bijective R h)
/-- The unique ring isomorphism between `ZMod p` and a ring `R` of cardinality a prime `p`.
If you need any property of this isomorphism, first of all use `ringEquivOfPrime_eq_ringEquiv`
below (after `have : CharP R p := ...`) and deduce it by the results about `ZMod.ringEquiv`. -/
noncomputable def ringEquivOfPrime [Fintype R] {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (hR : Fintype.card R = p) :
ZMod p ≃+* R :=
have : Nontrivial R := Fintype.one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial.1 (hR ▸ hp.one_lt)
-- The following line exists as `charP_of_card_eq_prime` in `Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.CharAndCard`.
have : CharP R p := (CharP.charP_iff_prime_eq_zero hp).2 (hR ▸ Nat.cast_card_eq_zero R)
ZMod.ringEquiv R hR
@[simp]
lemma ringEquivOfPrime_eq_ringEquiv [Fintype R] {p : ℕ} [CharP R p] (hp : p.Prime)
(hR : Fintype.card R = p) : ringEquivOfPrime R hp hR = ringEquiv R hR := rfl
/-- The identity between `ZMod m` and `ZMod n` when `m = n`, as a ring isomorphism. -/
def ringEquivCongr {m n : ℕ} (h : m = n) : ZMod m ≃+* ZMod n := by
rcases m with - | m <;> rcases n with - | n
· exact RingEquiv.refl _
· exfalso
exact n.succ_ne_zero h.symm
· exfalso
exact m.succ_ne_zero h
· exact
{ finCongr h with
map_mul' := fun a b => by
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
rw [Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_mul, Fin.coe_mul, Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_cast, ← h]
map_add' := fun a b => by
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
rw [Fin.coe_cast, Fin.val_add, Fin.val_add, Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_cast, ← h] }
@[simp] lemma ringEquivCongr_refl (a : ℕ) : ringEquivCongr (rfl : a = a) = .refl _ := by
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_refl_apply {a : ℕ} (x : ZMod a) : ringEquivCongr rfl x = x := by
rw [ringEquivCongr_refl]
rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_symm {a b : ℕ} (hab : a = b) :
(ringEquivCongr hab).symm = ringEquivCongr hab.symm := by
subst hab
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_trans {a b c : ℕ} (hab : a = b) (hbc : b = c) :
(ringEquivCongr hab).trans (ringEquivCongr hbc) = ringEquivCongr (hab.trans hbc) := by
subst hab hbc
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_ringEquivCongr_apply {a b c : ℕ} (hab : a = b) (hbc : b = c) (x : ZMod a) :
ringEquivCongr hbc (ringEquivCongr hab x) = ringEquivCongr (hab.trans hbc) x := by
rw [← ringEquivCongr_trans hab hbc]
rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_val {a b : ℕ} (h : a = b) (x : ZMod a) :
ZMod.val ((ZMod.ringEquivCongr h) x) = ZMod.val x := by
subst h
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_intCast {a b : ℕ} (h : a = b) (z : ℤ) :
ZMod.ringEquivCongr h z = z := by
subst h
cases a <;> rfl
end CharEq
end UniversalProperty
| variable {m n : ℕ}
@[simp]
theorem val_eq_zero : ∀ {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n), a.val = 0 ↔ a = 0
| 0, _ => Int.natAbs_eq_zero
| n + 1, a => by
| Mathlib/Data/ZMod/Basic.lean | 469 | 474 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.GeomSum
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.CommRing
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Equiv
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.BigOperators
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Noetherian.Basic
/-!
# Ring-theoretic supplement of Algebra.Polynomial.
## Main results
* `MvPolynomial.isDomain`:
If a ring is an integral domain, then so is its polynomial ring over finitely many variables.
* `Polynomial.isNoetherianRing`:
Hilbert basis theorem, that if a ring is noetherian then so is its polynomial ring.
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Finset
universe u v w
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type*}
namespace Polynomial
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
instance instCharP (p : ℕ) [h : CharP R p] : CharP R[X] p :=
let ⟨h⟩ := h
⟨fun n => by rw [← map_natCast C, ← C_0, C_inj, h]⟩
instance instExpChar (p : ℕ) [h : ExpChar R p] : ExpChar R[X] p := by
cases h; exacts [ExpChar.zero, ExpChar.prime ‹_›]
variable (R)
/-- The `R`-submodule of `R[X]` consisting of polynomials of degree ≤ `n`. -/
def degreeLE (n : WithBot ℕ) : Submodule R R[X] :=
⨅ k : ℕ, ⨅ _ : ↑k > n, LinearMap.ker (lcoeff R k)
/-- The `R`-submodule of `R[X]` consisting of polynomials of degree < `n`. -/
def degreeLT (n : ℕ) : Submodule R R[X] :=
⨅ k : ℕ, ⨅ (_ : k ≥ n), LinearMap.ker (lcoeff R k)
variable {R}
theorem mem_degreeLE {n : WithBot ℕ} {f : R[X]} : f ∈ degreeLE R n ↔ degree f ≤ n := by
simp only [degreeLE, Submodule.mem_iInf, degree_le_iff_coeff_zero, LinearMap.mem_ker]; rfl
@[mono]
theorem degreeLE_mono {m n : WithBot ℕ} (H : m ≤ n) : degreeLE R m ≤ degreeLE R n := fun _ hf =>
mem_degreeLE.2 (le_trans (mem_degreeLE.1 hf) H)
theorem degreeLE_eq_span_X_pow [DecidableEq R] {n : ℕ} :
degreeLE R n = Submodule.span R ↑((Finset.range (n + 1)).image fun n => (X : R[X]) ^ n) := by
apply le_antisymm
· intro p hp
replace hp := mem_degreeLE.1 hp
rw [← Polynomial.sum_monomial_eq p, Polynomial.sum]
refine Submodule.sum_mem _ fun k hk => ?_
have := WithBot.coe_le_coe.1 (Finset.sup_le_iff.1 hp k hk)
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, C_mul']
refine
Submodule.smul_mem _ _
(Submodule.subset_span <|
Finset.mem_coe.2 <|
Finset.mem_image.2 ⟨_, Finset.mem_range.2 (Nat.lt_succ_of_le this), rfl⟩)
rw [Submodule.span_le, Finset.coe_image, Set.image_subset_iff]
intro k hk
apply mem_degreeLE.2
exact
(degree_X_pow_le _).trans (WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 <| Nat.le_of_lt_succ <| Finset.mem_range.1 hk)
theorem mem_degreeLT {n : ℕ} {f : R[X]} : f ∈ degreeLT R n ↔ degree f < n := by
rw [degreeLT, Submodule.mem_iInf]
conv_lhs => intro i; rw [Submodule.mem_iInf]
rw [degree, Finset.max_eq_sup_coe]
rw [Finset.sup_lt_iff ?_]
rotate_left
· apply WithBot.bot_lt_coe
conv_rhs =>
simp only [mem_support_iff]
intro b
rw [Nat.cast_withBot, WithBot.coe_lt_coe, lt_iff_not_le, Ne, not_imp_not]
rfl
@[mono]
theorem degreeLT_mono {m n : ℕ} (H : m ≤ n) : degreeLT R m ≤ degreeLT R n := fun _ hf =>
mem_degreeLT.2 (lt_of_lt_of_le (mem_degreeLT.1 hf) <| WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 H)
theorem degreeLT_eq_span_X_pow [DecidableEq R] {n : ℕ} :
degreeLT R n = Submodule.span R ↑((Finset.range n).image fun n => X ^ n : Finset R[X]) := by
apply le_antisymm
· intro p hp
replace hp := mem_degreeLT.1 hp
rw [← Polynomial.sum_monomial_eq p, Polynomial.sum]
refine Submodule.sum_mem _ fun k hk => ?_
have := WithBot.coe_lt_coe.1 ((Finset.sup_lt_iff <| WithBot.bot_lt_coe n).1 hp k hk)
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, C_mul']
refine
Submodule.smul_mem _ _
(Submodule.subset_span <|
Finset.mem_coe.2 <| Finset.mem_image.2 ⟨_, Finset.mem_range.2 this, rfl⟩)
rw [Submodule.span_le, Finset.coe_image, Set.image_subset_iff]
intro k hk
apply mem_degreeLT.2
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (degree_X_pow_le _) (WithBot.coe_lt_coe.2 <| Finset.mem_range.1 hk)
/-- The first `n` coefficients on `degreeLT n` form a linear equivalence with `Fin n → R`. -/
def degreeLTEquiv (R) [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : degreeLT R n ≃ₗ[R] Fin n → R where
toFun p n := (↑p : R[X]).coeff n
invFun f :=
⟨∑ i : Fin n, monomial i (f i),
(degreeLT R n).sum_mem fun i _ =>
mem_degreeLT.mpr
(lt_of_le_of_lt (degree_monomial_le i (f i)) (WithBot.coe_lt_coe.mpr i.is_lt))⟩
map_add' p q := by
ext
dsimp
rw [coeff_add]
map_smul' x p := by
ext
dsimp
rw [coeff_smul]
rfl
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨p, hp⟩
ext1
simp only [Submodule.coe_mk]
by_cases hp0 : p = 0
· subst hp0
simp only [coeff_zero, LinearMap.map_zero, Finset.sum_const_zero]
rw [mem_degreeLT, degree_eq_natDegree hp0, Nat.cast_lt] at hp
conv_rhs => rw [p.as_sum_range' n hp, ← Fin.sum_univ_eq_sum_range]
right_inv f := by
ext i
simp only [finset_sum_coeff, Submodule.coe_mk]
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single i, coeff_monomial, if_pos rfl]
· rintro j - hji
rw [coeff_monomial, if_neg]
rwa [← Fin.ext_iff]
· intro h
exact (h (Finset.mem_univ _)).elim
theorem degreeLTEquiv_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero {n : ℕ} {p : R[X]} (hp : p ∈ degreeLT R n) :
degreeLTEquiv _ _ ⟨p, hp⟩ = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by simp
theorem eval_eq_sum_degreeLTEquiv {n : ℕ} {p : R[X]} (hp : p ∈ degreeLT R n) (x : R) :
p.eval x = ∑ i, degreeLTEquiv _ _ ⟨p, hp⟩ i * x ^ (i : ℕ) := by
simp_rw [eval_eq_sum]
exact (sum_fin _ (by simp_rw [zero_mul, forall_const]) (mem_degreeLT.mp hp)).symm
theorem degreeLT_succ_eq_degreeLE {n : ℕ} : degreeLT R (n + 1) = degreeLE R n := by
ext x
by_cases x_zero : x = 0
· simp_rw [x_zero, Submodule.zero_mem]
· rw [mem_degreeLT, mem_degreeLE, ← natDegree_lt_iff_degree_lt (by rwa [ne_eq]),
← natDegree_le_iff_degree_le, Nat.lt_succ]
/-- The equivalence between monic polynomials of degree `n` and polynomials of degree less than
`n`, formed by adding a term `X ^ n`. -/
def monicEquivDegreeLT [Nontrivial R] (n : ℕ) :
{ p : R[X] // p.Monic ∧ p.natDegree = n } ≃ degreeLT R n where
toFun p := ⟨p.1.eraseLead, by
rcases p with ⟨p, hp, rfl⟩
simp only [mem_degreeLT]
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ degree_le_natDegree
exact degree_eraseLead_lt (ne_zero_of_ne_zero_of_monic one_ne_zero hp)⟩
invFun := fun p =>
⟨X^n + p.1, monic_X_pow_add (mem_degreeLT.1 p.2), by
rw [natDegree_add_eq_left_of_degree_lt]
· simp
· simp [mem_degreeLT.1 p.2]⟩
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨p, hp, rfl⟩
ext1
simp only
conv_rhs => rw [← eraseLead_add_C_mul_X_pow p]
simp [Monic.def.1 hp, add_comm]
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨p, hp⟩
ext1
simp only
rw [eraseLead_add_of_degree_lt_left]
· simp
· simp [mem_degreeLT.1 hp]
/-- For every polynomial `p` in the span of a set `s : Set R[X]`, there exists a polynomial of
`p' ∈ s` with higher degree. See also `Polynomial.exists_degree_le_of_mem_span_of_finite`. -/
theorem exists_degree_le_of_mem_span {s : Set R[X]} {p : R[X]}
(hs : s.Nonempty) (hp : p ∈ Submodule.span R s) :
∃ p' ∈ s, degree p ≤ degree p' := by
by_contra! h
by_cases hp_zero : p = 0
· rw [hp_zero, degree_zero] at h
rcases hs with ⟨x, hx⟩
exact not_lt_bot (h x hx)
· have : p ∈ degreeLT R (natDegree p) := by
refine (Submodule.span_le.mpr fun p' p'_mem => ?_) hp
rw [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_degreeLT, Nat.cast_withBot]
exact lt_of_lt_of_le (h p' p'_mem) degree_le_natDegree
rwa [mem_degreeLT, Nat.cast_withBot, degree_eq_natDegree hp_zero,
Nat.cast_withBot, lt_self_iff_false] at this
/-- A stronger version of `Polynomial.exists_degree_le_of_mem_span` under the assumption that the
set `s : R[X]` is finite. There exists a polynomial `p' ∈ s` whose degree dominates the degree of
every element of `p ∈ span R s`. -/
theorem exists_degree_le_of_mem_span_of_finite {s : Set R[X]} (s_fin : s.Finite) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
∃ p' ∈ s, ∀ (p : R[X]), p ∈ Submodule.span R s → degree p ≤ degree p' := by
rcases Set.Finite.exists_maximal_wrt degree s s_fin hs with ⟨a, has, hmax⟩
refine ⟨a, has, fun p hp => ?_⟩
rcases exists_degree_le_of_mem_span hs hp with ⟨p', hp'⟩
by_cases h : degree a ≤ degree p'
· rw [← hmax p' hp'.left h] at hp'; exact hp'.right
· exact le_trans hp'.right (not_le.mp h).le
/-- The span of every finite set of polynomials is contained in a `degreeLE n` for some `n`. -/
theorem span_le_degreeLE_of_finite {s : Set R[X]} (s_fin : s.Finite) :
∃ n : ℕ, Submodule.span R s ≤ degreeLE R n := by
by_cases s_emp : s.Nonempty
· rcases exists_degree_le_of_mem_span_of_finite s_fin s_emp with ⟨p', _, hp'max⟩
exact ⟨natDegree p', fun p hp => mem_degreeLE.mpr ((hp'max _ hp).trans degree_le_natDegree)⟩
· rw [Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty] at s_emp
rw [s_emp, Submodule.span_empty]
exact ⟨0, bot_le⟩
/-- The span of every finite set of polynomials is contained in a `degreeLT n` for some `n`. -/
theorem span_of_finite_le_degreeLT {s : Set R[X]} (s_fin : s.Finite) :
∃ n : ℕ, Submodule.span R s ≤ degreeLT R n := by
rcases span_le_degreeLE_of_finite s_fin with ⟨n, _⟩
exact ⟨n + 1, by rwa [degreeLT_succ_eq_degreeLE]⟩
/-- If `R` is a nontrivial ring, the polynomials `R[X]` are not finite as an `R`-module. When `R` is
a field, this is equivalent to `R[X]` being an infinite-dimensional vector space over `R`. -/
theorem not_finite [Nontrivial R] : ¬ Module.Finite R R[X] := by
rw [Module.finite_def, Submodule.fg_def]
push_neg
intro s hs contra
rcases span_le_degreeLE_of_finite hs with ⟨n,hn⟩
have : ((X : R[X]) ^ (n + 1)) ∈ Polynomial.degreeLE R ↑n := by
rw [contra] at hn
exact hn Submodule.mem_top
rw [mem_degreeLE, degree_X_pow, Nat.cast_le, add_le_iff_nonpos_right, nonpos_iff_eq_zero] at this
exact one_ne_zero this
theorem geom_sum_X_comp_X_add_one_eq_sum (n : ℕ) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, (X : R[X]) ^ i).comp (X + 1) =
(Finset.range n).sum fun i : ℕ => (n.choose (i + 1) : R[X]) * X ^ i := by
ext i
trans (n.choose (i + 1) : R); swap
· simp only [finset_sum_coeff, ← C_eq_natCast, coeff_C_mul_X_pow]
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single i, if_pos rfl]
· simp +contextual only [@eq_comm _ i, if_false, eq_self_iff_true,
imp_true_iff]
· simp +contextual only [Nat.lt_add_one_iff, Nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt,
Nat.cast_zero, Finset.mem_range, not_lt, eq_self_iff_true, if_true, imp_true_iff]
induction' n with n ih generalizing i
· dsimp; simp only [zero_comp, coeff_zero, Nat.cast_zero]
· simp only [geom_sum_succ', ih, add_comp, X_pow_comp, coeff_add, Nat.choose_succ_succ,
Nat.cast_add, coeff_X_add_one_pow]
theorem Monic.geom_sum {P : R[X]} (hP : P.Monic) (hdeg : 0 < P.natDegree) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, P ^ i).Monic := by
nontriviality R
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hn
rw [geom_sum_succ']
refine (hP.pow _).add_of_left ?_
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (degree_sum_le _ _) ?_
rw [Finset.sup_lt_iff]
· simp only [Finset.mem_range, degree_eq_natDegree (hP.pow _).ne_zero]
simp only [Nat.cast_lt, hP.natDegree_pow]
intro k
exact nsmul_lt_nsmul_left hdeg
· rw [bot_lt_iff_ne_bot, Ne, degree_eq_bot]
exact (hP.pow _).ne_zero
theorem Monic.geom_sum' {P : R[X]} (hP : P.Monic) (hdeg : 0 < P.degree) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(∑ i ∈ range n, P ^ i).Monic :=
hP.geom_sum (natDegree_pos_iff_degree_pos.2 hdeg) hn
theorem monic_geom_sum_X {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : (∑ i ∈ range n, (X : R[X]) ^ i).Monic := by
nontriviality R
apply monic_X.geom_sum _ hn
simp only [natDegree_X, zero_lt_one]
end Semiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R]
/-- Given a polynomial, return the polynomial whose coefficients are in
the ring closure of the original coefficients. -/
def restriction (p : R[X]) : Polynomial (Subring.closure (↑p.coeffs : Set R)) :=
∑ i ∈ p.support,
monomial i
(⟨p.coeff i,
letI := Classical.decEq R
if H : p.coeff i = 0 then H.symm ▸ (Subring.closure _).zero_mem
else Subring.subset_closure (p.coeff_mem_coeffs _ H)⟩ :
Subring.closure (↑p.coeffs : Set R))
@[simp]
theorem coeff_restriction {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} : ↑(coeff (restriction p) n) = coeff p n := by
classical
simp only [restriction, coeff_monomial, finset_sum_coeff, mem_support_iff, Finset.sum_ite_eq',
Ne, ite_not]
split_ifs with h
· rw [h]
rfl
· rfl
theorem coeff_restriction' {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} : (coeff (restriction p) n).1 = coeff p n := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem support_restriction (p : R[X]) : support (restriction p) = support p := by
ext i
simp only [mem_support_iff, not_iff_not, Ne]
conv_rhs => rw [← coeff_restriction]
exact ⟨fun H => by rw [H, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero], fun H => Subtype.coe_injective H⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_restriction {R : Type u} [CommRing R] (p : R[X]) :
p.restriction.map (algebraMap _ _) = p :=
ext fun n => by rw [coeff_map, Algebra.algebraMap_ofSubring_apply, coeff_restriction]
@[simp]
theorem degree_restriction {p : R[X]} : (restriction p).degree = p.degree := by simp [degree]
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_restriction {p : R[X]} : (restriction p).natDegree = p.natDegree := by
simp [natDegree]
@[simp]
theorem monic_restriction {p : R[X]} : Monic (restriction p) ↔ Monic p := by
simp only [Monic, leadingCoeff, natDegree_restriction]
rw [← @coeff_restriction _ _ p]
exact ⟨fun H => by rw [H, OneMemClass.coe_one], fun H => Subtype.coe_injective H⟩
@[simp]
theorem restriction_zero : restriction (0 : R[X]) = 0 := by
simp only [restriction, Finset.sum_empty, support_zero]
@[simp]
theorem restriction_one : restriction (1 : R[X]) = 1 :=
ext fun i => Subtype.eq <| by rw [coeff_restriction', coeff_one, coeff_one]; split_ifs <;> rfl
variable [Semiring S] {f : R →+* S} {x : S}
theorem eval₂_restriction {p : R[X]} :
eval₂ f x p =
eval₂ (f.comp (Subring.subtype (Subring.closure (p.coeffs : Set R)))) x p.restriction := by
simp only [eval₂_eq_sum, sum, support_restriction, ← @coeff_restriction _ _ p, RingHom.comp_apply,
Subring.coe_subtype]
section ToSubring
variable (p : R[X]) (T : Subring R)
/-- Given a polynomial `p` and a subring `T` that contains the coefficients of `p`,
return the corresponding polynomial whose coefficients are in `T`. -/
def toSubring (hp : (↑p.coeffs : Set R) ⊆ T) : T[X] :=
∑ i ∈ p.support,
monomial i
(⟨p.coeff i,
letI := Classical.decEq R
if H : p.coeff i = 0 then H.symm ▸ T.zero_mem else hp (p.coeff_mem_coeffs _ H)⟩ : T)
variable (hp : (↑p.coeffs : Set R) ⊆ T)
@[simp]
theorem coeff_toSubring {n : ℕ} : ↑(coeff (toSubring p T hp) n) = coeff p n := by
classical
simp only [toSubring, coeff_monomial, finset_sum_coeff, mem_support_iff, Finset.sum_ite_eq',
Ne, ite_not]
split_ifs with h
· rw [h]
rfl
· rfl
theorem coeff_toSubring' {n : ℕ} : (coeff (toSubring p T hp) n).1 = coeff p n := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem support_toSubring : support (toSubring p T hp) = support p := by
ext i
simp only [mem_support_iff, not_iff_not, Ne]
conv_rhs => rw [← coeff_toSubring p T hp]
exact ⟨fun H => by rw [H, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero], fun H => Subtype.coe_injective H⟩
@[simp]
theorem degree_toSubring : (toSubring p T hp).degree = p.degree := by simp [degree]
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_toSubring : (toSubring p T hp).natDegree = p.natDegree := by simp [natDegree]
@[simp]
theorem monic_toSubring : Monic (toSubring p T hp) ↔ Monic p := by
simp_rw [Monic, leadingCoeff, natDegree_toSubring, ← coeff_toSubring p T hp]
exact ⟨fun H => by rw [H, OneMemClass.coe_one], fun H => Subtype.coe_injective H⟩
@[simp]
theorem toSubring_zero : toSubring (0 : R[X]) T (by simp [coeffs]) = 0 := by
ext i
simp
@[simp]
theorem toSubring_one :
toSubring (1 : R[X]) T
(Set.Subset.trans coeffs_one <| Finset.singleton_subset_set_iff.2 T.one_mem) =
1 :=
ext fun i => Subtype.eq <| by
rw [coeff_toSubring', coeff_one, coeff_one, apply_ite Subtype.val, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero,
OneMemClass.coe_one]
@[simp]
theorem map_toSubring : (p.toSubring T hp).map (Subring.subtype T) = p := by
ext n
simp [coeff_map]
end ToSubring
variable (T : Subring R)
/-- Given a polynomial whose coefficients are in some subring, return
the corresponding polynomial whose coefficients are in the ambient ring. -/
def ofSubring (p : T[X]) : R[X] :=
∑ i ∈ p.support, monomial i (p.coeff i : R)
theorem coeff_ofSubring (p : T[X]) (n : ℕ) : coeff (ofSubring T p) n = (coeff p n : T) := by
simp only [ofSubring, coeff_monomial, finset_sum_coeff, mem_support_iff, Finset.sum_ite_eq',
ite_eq_right_iff, Ne, ite_not, Classical.not_not, ite_eq_left_iff]
intro h
rw [h, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero]
@[simp]
theorem coeffs_ofSubring {p : T[X]} : (↑(p.ofSubring T).coeffs : Set R) ⊆ T := by
classical
intro i hi
simp only [coeffs, Set.mem_image, mem_support_iff, Ne, Finset.mem_coe,
(Finset.coe_image)] at hi
rcases hi with ⟨n, _, h'n⟩
rw [← h'n, coeff_ofSubring]
exact Subtype.mem (coeff p n : T)
end Ring
end Polynomial
namespace Ideal
open Polynomial
|
section Semiring
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Basic.lean | 465 | 467 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GradedMonoid
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Basic
/-!
# Additively-graded multiplicative structures on `⨁ i, A i`
This module provides a set of heterogeneous typeclasses for defining a multiplicative structure
over `⨁ i, A i` such that `(*) : A i → A j → A (i + j)`; that is to say, `A` forms an
additively-graded ring. The typeclasses are:
* `DirectSum.GNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A`
* `DirectSum.GSemiring A`
* `DirectSum.GRing A`
* `DirectSum.GCommSemiring A`
* `DirectSum.GCommRing A`
Respectively, these imbue the external direct sum `⨁ i, A i` with:
* `DirectSum.nonUnitalNonAssocSemiring`, `DirectSum.nonUnitalNonAssocRing`
* `DirectSum.semiring`
* `DirectSum.ring`
* `DirectSum.commSemiring`
* `DirectSum.commRing`
the base ring `A 0` with:
* `DirectSum.GradeZero.nonUnitalNonAssocSemiring`,
`DirectSum.GradeZero.nonUnitalNonAssocRing`
* `DirectSum.GradeZero.semiring`
* `DirectSum.GradeZero.ring`
* `DirectSum.GradeZero.commSemiring`
* `DirectSum.GradeZero.commRing`
and the `i`th grade `A i` with `A 0`-actions (`•`) defined as left-multiplication:
* `DirectSum.GradeZero.smul (A 0)`, `DirectSum.GradeZero.smulWithZero (A 0)`
* `DirectSum.GradeZero.module (A 0)`
* (nothing)
* (nothing)
* (nothing)
Note that in the presence of these instances, `⨁ i, A i` itself inherits an `A 0`-action.
`DirectSum.ofZeroRingHom : A 0 →+* ⨁ i, A i` provides `DirectSum.of A 0` as a ring
homomorphism.
`DirectSum.toSemiring` extends `DirectSum.toAddMonoid` to produce a `RingHom`.
## Direct sums of subobjects
Additionally, this module provides helper functions to construct `GSemiring` and `GCommSemiring`
instances for:
* `A : ι → Submonoid S`:
`DirectSum.GSemiring.ofAddSubmonoids`, `DirectSum.GCommSemiring.ofAddSubmonoids`.
* `A : ι → Subgroup S`:
`DirectSum.GSemiring.ofAddSubgroups`, `DirectSum.GCommSemiring.ofAddSubgroups`.
* `A : ι → Submodule S`:
`DirectSum.GSemiring.ofSubmodules`, `DirectSum.GCommSemiring.ofSubmodules`.
If `sSupIndep A`, these provide a gradation of `⨆ i, A i`, and the mapping `⨁ i, A i →+ ⨆ i, A i`
can be obtained as `DirectSum.toMonoid (fun i ↦ AddSubmonoid.inclusion <| le_iSup A i)`.
## Tags
graded ring, filtered ring, direct sum, add_submonoid
-/
variable {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι]
namespace DirectSum
open DirectSum
/-! ### Typeclasses -/
section Defs
variable (A : ι → Type*)
/-- A graded version of `NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring`. -/
class GNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring [Add ι] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (A i)] extends
GradedMonoid.GMul A where
/-- Multiplication from the right with any graded component's zero vanishes. -/
mul_zero : ∀ {i j} (a : A i), mul a (0 : A j) = 0
/-- Multiplication from the left with any graded component's zero vanishes. -/
zero_mul : ∀ {i j} (b : A j), mul (0 : A i) b = 0
/-- Multiplication from the right between graded components distributes with respect to
addition. -/
mul_add : ∀ {i j} (a : A i) (b c : A j), mul a (b + c) = mul a b + mul a c
/-- Multiplication from the left between graded components distributes with respect to
addition. -/
add_mul : ∀ {i j} (a b : A i) (c : A j), mul (a + b) c = mul a c + mul b c
end Defs
section Defs
variable (A : ι → Type*)
/-- A graded version of `Semiring`. -/
class GSemiring [AddMonoid ι] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (A i)] extends GNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A,
GradedMonoid.GMonoid A where
/-- The canonical map from ℕ to the zeroth component of a graded semiring. -/
natCast : ℕ → A 0
/-- The canonical map from ℕ to a graded semiring respects zero. -/
natCast_zero : natCast 0 = 0
/-- The canonical map from ℕ to a graded semiring respects successors. -/
natCast_succ : ∀ n : ℕ, natCast (n + 1) = natCast n + GradedMonoid.GOne.one
/-- A graded version of `CommSemiring`. -/
class GCommSemiring [AddCommMonoid ι] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (A i)] extends GSemiring A,
GradedMonoid.GCommMonoid A
/-- A graded version of `Ring`. -/
class GRing [AddMonoid ι] [∀ i, AddCommGroup (A i)] extends GSemiring A where
/-- The canonical map from ℤ to the zeroth component of a graded ring. -/
intCast : ℤ → A 0
/-- The canonical map from ℤ to a graded ring extends the canonical map from ℕ to the underlying
graded semiring. -/
intCast_ofNat : ∀ n : ℕ, intCast n = natCast n
/-- On negative integers, the canonical map from ℤ to a graded ring is the negative extension of
the canonical map from ℕ to the underlying graded semiring. -/
-- Porting note: -(n+1) -> Int.negSucc
intCast_negSucc_ofNat : ∀ n : ℕ, intCast (Int.negSucc n) = -natCast (n + 1 : ℕ)
/-- A graded version of `CommRing`. -/
class GCommRing [AddCommMonoid ι] [∀ i, AddCommGroup (A i)] extends GRing A, GCommSemiring A
end Defs
theorem of_eq_of_gradedMonoid_eq {A : ι → Type*} [∀ i : ι, AddCommMonoid (A i)] {i j : ι} {a : A i}
{b : A j} (h : GradedMonoid.mk i a = GradedMonoid.mk j b) :
DirectSum.of A i a = DirectSum.of A j b :=
DFinsupp.single_eq_of_sigma_eq h
variable (A : ι → Type*)
/-! ### Instances for `⨁ i, A i` -/
section One
variable [Zero ι] [GradedMonoid.GOne A] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (A i)]
instance : One (⨁ i, A i) where one := DirectSum.of A 0 GradedMonoid.GOne.one
theorem one_def : 1 = DirectSum.of A 0 GradedMonoid.GOne.one := rfl
end One
section Mul
variable [Add ι] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (A i)] [GNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A]
open AddMonoidHom (flip_apply coe_comp compHom)
/-- The piecewise multiplication from the `Mul` instance, as a bundled homomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def gMulHom {i j} : A i →+ A j →+ A (i + j) where
toFun a :=
{ toFun := fun b => GradedMonoid.GMul.mul a b
map_zero' := GNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring.mul_zero _
map_add' := GNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring.mul_add _ }
map_zero' := AddMonoidHom.ext fun a => GNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring.zero_mul a
map_add' _ _ := AddMonoidHom.ext fun _ => GNonUnitalNonAssocSemiring.add_mul _ _ _
/-- The multiplication from the `Mul` instance, as a bundled homomorphism. -/
-- See note [non-reducible instance]
@[reducible]
def mulHom : (⨁ i, A i) →+ (⨁ i, A i) →+ ⨁ i, A i :=
DirectSum.toAddMonoid fun _ =>
AddMonoidHom.flip <|
DirectSum.toAddMonoid fun _ =>
AddMonoidHom.flip <| (DirectSum.of A _).compHom.comp <| gMulHom A
instance instMul : Mul (⨁ i, A i) where
mul := fun a b => mulHom A a b
instance : NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring (⨁ i, A i) :=
{ (inferInstance : AddCommMonoid _) with
zero_mul := fun _ => by simp only [Mul.mul, HMul.hMul, map_zero, AddMonoidHom.zero_apply]
mul_zero := fun _ => by simp only [Mul.mul, HMul.hMul, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
left_distrib := fun _ _ _ => by simp only [Mul.mul, HMul.hMul, AddMonoidHom.map_add]
right_distrib := fun _ _ _ => by
simp only [Mul.mul, HMul.hMul, AddMonoidHom.map_add, AddMonoidHom.add_apply] }
variable {A}
theorem mulHom_apply (a b : ⨁ i, A i) : mulHom A a b = a * b := rfl
theorem mulHom_of_of {i j} (a : A i) (b : A j) :
mulHom A (of A i a) (of A j b) = of A (i + j) (GradedMonoid.GMul.mul a b) := by
unfold mulHom
simp only [toAddMonoid_of, flip_apply, coe_comp, Function.comp_apply]
rfl
theorem of_mul_of {i j} (a : A i) (b : A j) :
of A i a * of A j b = of _ (i + j) (GradedMonoid.GMul.mul a b) :=
mulHom_of_of a b
end Mul
section Semiring
variable [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (A i)] [AddMonoid ι] [GSemiring A]
open AddMonoidHom (flipHom coe_comp compHom flip_apply)
private nonrec theorem one_mul (x : ⨁ i, A i) : 1 * x = x := by
suffices mulHom A One.one = AddMonoidHom.id (⨁ i, A i) from DFunLike.congr_fun this x
apply addHom_ext; intro i xi
simp only [One.one]
rw [mulHom_of_of]
exact of_eq_of_gradedMonoid_eq (one_mul <| GradedMonoid.mk i xi)
private nonrec theorem mul_one (x : ⨁ i, A i) : x * 1 = x := by
suffices (mulHom A).flip One.one = AddMonoidHom.id (⨁ i, A i) from DFunLike.congr_fun this x
apply addHom_ext; intro i xi
simp only [One.one]
rw [flip_apply, mulHom_of_of]
| exact of_eq_of_gradedMonoid_eq (mul_one <| GradedMonoid.mk i xi)
private theorem mul_assoc (a b c : ⨁ i, A i) : a * b * c = a * (b * c) := by
-- (`fun a b c => a * b * c` as a bundled hom) = (`fun a b c => a * (b * c)` as a bundled hom)
suffices (mulHom A).compHom.comp (mulHom A) =
(AddMonoidHom.compHom flipHom <| (mulHom A).flip.compHom.comp (mulHom A)).flip by
| Mathlib/Algebra/DirectSum/Ring.lean | 229 | 234 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.