text stringlengths 1 29.3k ⌀ | label float64 0 1 |
|---|---|
AFD
Why do you want to delete the article list of micronations? This is a perfectly fine article. It is in good shape. There is no reason to delete it. Please respond on my talk page. | 0 |
Javier Clemente
Clemente has only recently taken charge of Serbia and with the greatest respect bar being appointed, there is not much else to report. Most of what you wrote was speculation about future events or referred to recent events about Serbia in World Cup which had nothing at all to do with Clemente. Most recent does not necessarily mean most important. Clemente has a long history as a La Liga manager and only a short history to date with Serbia. Hopefully from your POV there will be more to write about in future.
PS Have posted these and your comments on Talk:Javier Clemente | 0 |
"
The ""note"" s/he left was a demand for intervention for his/her side. S/he was not asking for neutral mediation, that much is clear, and you shouldn't make little of that - it only arouses my suspicions that your intervention wouldn't be a neutral one. As for your question, I read your infobox and the categories on your profile about Israel and got mixed up. About my asking the WikiProject Palestine people to not intervene: well, no one has intervened from that corner thus far - they probably know the Wikipedia rules better than I do, though, yes, I think it's absolutely necessary that people from other political persuasions provide balance in the conversation if Precision123's own canvassing succeeds. " | 0 |
"
You wrote (a few inches above) you acknowledge that the community doesn’t want “son of autoformatting” You've also accused him (and Locke Cole) of ""backing away"" from the code UC Bill has been working on, not to mention the COUNTLESS OTHER LINES OF BULLSHIT YOU'VE SPOUTED THAT YOU KNOW TO BE INTENTIONALLY FALSE because you're hoping that it'll confuse people. You should be PERMANENTLY BANNED from Wikipedia. You're a useless drain on this project that does nothing but obstruct the work of other people. Get bent, WP:DICK. (Go ahead and report me, and to whatever admin Greg drags into this, feel free to block me all you want, I'm going to be offline for a while anyway so I don't care.)" | 0 |
All of these are bad and confusing. This is a simple article intended for the simple reader. I will suggest:
Mass killing on the scale of millions (possibly billions) of people occurred in communist and socialist countries. The highest death tolls occured in Russia and Red China. The Reds deliberately killed millions using guns, knives, bayonets, poison gases, artillery shells. The lion's share was caused by inaccessible and inadequate socialized medicine, land reform, tort reform. These mass killings are known as the Red Holocaust, mirroring the Holocaust in Nazi Germany. 24.146.224.106 | 0 |
Sounds good. -) I'd try talking them through various different approaches - obviously, content partnerships (with examples of pre-existing ones), but also things like us helping them with digitization of particularly important works (and/or proofreading for texts), Wikipedian in Residence, Backstage Pass-style events, putting curators in contact with wikipedia editors and generally sharing knowledge, getting them using Wikipedia content/links on their website/in their displays, etc. Don't focus too narrowly on one of these to start with, but see what they are interested in initially and then press on with that.
Let me know if you need any 'official' representation or other support from WMUK, e.g. if you want me to come talk to them with you, if there is content that needs uploading in bulk, or agreements signing, etc. Also, if you need any financial support at any point, let us know - if under £100 then via the microgrants process, or if over then get in touch. Basically, if there's anything we can do to help, let us know. ;-)
Good luck! | 0 |
"
I have to say that the article is one of the better written and better sourced MMA fighter articles. I do hope Rio gets a few fights ""in the big leagues"" so that the article can stay and hopefully show a good example of how to write up the background and personal life of an MMA fighter. " | 0 |
"
Wild Goose Help
Hi Hesperian, Nice name BTW. How do I link to your wiki source copies of JBOR`s poems, I would like to add ""Flying Dutchman"" and ""Old school clock"" as links. Cheers " | 0 |
Template request
There is a reply to your request for a template on 'sea cadets'. | 0 |
"
To me Cush seems one of the sane, reasonable voices in this endless debate. Regardless, I frankly would be happy if you can retract/amend your personal attacks. talk " | 0 |
"
Copyright problems with Image:Louis1.jpg
An image that you uploaded, Image:Louis1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. " | 0 |
"
Because the current bold-and-italics setup on my talk page isn't too informative, I've put together a chart for the download of nomination forms . Would you please check this page? Please note the ""confirmed"" column — if you've downloaded the forms that the chart says you have, please change the ""N"" to a ""Y"", and if you've done work that the chart says you've not or if you've not done work the chart says you have, please change the chart to reflect reality. Thanks! " | 0 |
"
Oppose per Vegaswikian. I've never heard of the book, but have heard of plenty of people with this given name. There is also an Ian McKellen film called ""Emile"" so really there is no legitimate reason to make this move. — " | 0 |
G7
Why isn't G7 applicable on Owen Toon? Who has added substantial content to the article besides myself? - | 0 |
"
Cat Creek, Montana
He has returned as . .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! " | 0 |
Thanks Warren Tredrea, you inspired me to retire from wikipedia also. 3:00, 18 August 2010 (UTC) | 0 |
fix the block so at least we can edit from here when we log in?}} | 0 |
New unblock appeal
Starting a new section here for a new unblock appeal, as this user e-mailed me asking me to take a look at this. The initial e-mail was back in February 2010 (at the time of the SPI case) and nothing was done then, but the user e-mailed again recently (August 2010) and I'd like to try and sort this out. As far as I can tell, the declines of the unblock appeals above did not consider whether the initial identification as a sock was correct or not, so I've invited the SPI clerk at the time and blocking admin (MuZemike) and another admin (Future Perfect at Sunrise) here to comment. I believe 2007apm can still edit his talk page, so he should comment here as well to state his case, and I will reply to his e-mail telling him to do so. | 0 |
Done as requested. | 0 |
"
Talk:Revenue Tariff Party
Should have discussed first. A reliable source though. | Talk " | 0 |
Or It is arguable that some sharpshooting acts fall into the category of impalement arts when they involve a performer holding up targets for a marksman. Or One of the most difficult and dangerous feats for a knifethrower. These are all obviously unsourced, contentious statements. I cherry picked these, obviously, as some of the best (worst?) examples of unsourced content, but it would be good to start by sourcing statements like these. | 0 |
It's called tag teaming. Not a lot of options. Wait and see what happens at NPOVN. | 0 |
"
Maybe you should give the dictionary definition first:
""fascism /fashiz’m/ noun 1 an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government. 2 extreme right-wing, authoritarian, or intolerant views or practice. "" " | 0 |
See what W4 wrote, agree with him. This just plain isnt relevant! | 0 |
" —The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk • contribs) .
I'm not sure I get your point. Readers of Wikipedia aren't required to be familiar with all of its policies and guidelines, and so it can't be assumed that they will know about the notability requirements, which are in fact only a guideline. Moreover, there are plenty of organizations which don't go out of their way to publicize themselves yet are still notable, and aggrandizing connotates way more than just publicity. Including 'self-aggrandizing' doesn't at all suggest that that's their primary motive. As well, there could be notable trolls or notable trolling groups who don't self-aggrandize, and certainly not to the extent and in the joie de vire manner the GNAA does. Indeed, many trolling groups and individuals try to obscure or hide the fact that they're trolls, which often makes their activities more successful. Therefore, phrase is clearly relevant and not POV. " | 0 |
Re Conditional support of BLP AfD change
I didn't like the wording of the proposal on WT:BLP per se. I support, however the wording put forth by Doc on his essay. The former is too grey and misleading to achieve its intended purpose without causing collateral damage, while the latter is a lot better. Based on how deletion debates have gone in the past, I foresee several potential problems with the former wording without any additional qualifiers. - Best regards, | 0 |
"
Hi. I am offended by your use of the word ""nonsense"". I endeavoured to write a balanced and accurate piece and I believe I made a reasonable success of it, given that I had to work with what I consider as ""nonsense"" from other contributors. I firmly believe that my contribution was as or more NPOV as most other contributions, frankly. Perhaps you might avoide using 'nonsense' when you are welcoming users. " | 0 |
Deletion review for How Much Can We Boost IQ and Scholastic Achievement?
An editor has asked for a deletion review of How Much Can We Boost IQ and Scholastic Achievement?. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. | 0 |
Articles merged. 83.100.251.196 | 0 |
Likely, this is some misguided 13 year old who uses huggle too much. I noticed that you are being template spammed, too. Ugh! Have these new editors no respect for one of the original Wikipedia 200? | 0 |
, Just blued a basilica redlink. Let me see what else. | 0 |
My Conclusions ==
If I am incorrect as to any or all of my conclusions, please do not hesitate to tell me. I do want to learn all that I can of Jean de Venette. Thankyou
Thank you for your words of encouragement. I have added a Note to the section on The Three Maries, or Marys as you suggested. Please feel free to re-word if you so choose.
Put in the reference section as you suggested.
== | 0 |
"
American Heritage Dictionary
1. Physical force exerted for the purpose of violating, damaging, or abusing: crimes of violence.
Online Etymology Dictionary
c.1290, ""physical force used to inflict injury or damage,"" from Anglo-Fr. and O.Fr. violence, from L. violentia ""vehemence, impetuosity,"" from violentus ""vehement, forcible,"" probably related to violare (see violate).
WordNet
1. TABan act of aggression (as one against a person who resists); ""he may accomplish by craft in the long run what he cannot do by force and violence in the short one""
Carol Moore User:Carolmooredc User talk:Carolmooredc
Real Restructuring of Article to Explicate POVs
Re-reading the article itself, looking through pages of Search results on violence, ’s comments on perceptions, and looking at how the Terrorism article dealt with similar POV problems, I realize the whole article needs restructuring per the below and will do so in next few days after comments. Honest dealing with POVs is all I am interested in -) Will proceed during weekend.
OUTLINE:
''Violence is the exertion of physical force so as to injure or abuse. The word is used broadly and may describe the destructive action of natural phenomena like storms and landslides damaging physical things, accidental or intentional human destruction of property or injury to persons, or intentional psychological harm to those living under constant threat of physical abuse and/or verbal and emotional abuse. Ref:Merriam-Webster and American Heritage Dictionary" | 0 |
Bill James is actually a pen name of author James Tucker | 0 |
I think social housing is better explained under subsidized housing, which incorporates several different versions/methods including Public Housing. Please respond at the talk page. | 0 |
Sorry mcd00b but the debate isn't even and fair because the Genesis side has the name without consensus per last rfc and it isn't stable because im here asking for an rfc and ask about once a year as do others, and with their posts being censored and deleted then it clearly isn't even and fair. sergecross that's the whole point there doesn't need to be a new approach or viewpoint presented, peoples minds can change and consensus can change which is why having an rfc would be worth while. 80.192.85.232 | 0 |
On the basis of what you wrote in the image description page, I added the tag , as that seems to convey your intent. You may want to double-check what that license says to make sure you're OK with it. (t • c) | 0 |
I am somewhat confused as to your comment about why the holocaust was brought up. Surely Kristallnacht is generally considered part of the holocaust? The most documented/commented on parts of the nazi gun confiscation are directly in the sub-context of kristallnacht. the content dispute in the article is about did the nazi's use gun control against the jews (and to what degree did that contribute to the holocaust). Bringing up the holocaust is entirely appropriate in this context is it not? | 0 |
Collaboration
Hi Jayant. Let me unconfuse you about the whole collaboration thingy. It basically works like the Article Improvement Drive, where people vote for an article they really really want edited. You can still edit other articles, & you don't even have to edit the article nominated, but it just helps focus the group's attention at improving a single article. So continue editing as you were, & feel free to vote or edit the nominated article. Thanks, | 0 |
Basically the same material was used three times in the article which seems not in accord with Wikipedia policy. Cheers. | 0 |
Template:Did you know nominations/Moten Swing
Dr. Blofeld, nominated your article for DYK back in early December. The nomination was reviewed on December 28 and some issues were found; Gareth was notified on his talk page that day, and hasn't done anything to address these issues; the notification was archived last Friday. As a courtesy, I'm letting you know that the nomination exists, and is likely to be closed if no action is taken.
Do you want to follow up on the nomination? Please let me know. Many thanks. | 0 |
DYK for cognitive vulnerability
Greetings
I added a template of nomination for cognitive vulnerability. I saw your posting on it. Did you hear anything back from the ping you sent off as stated in your typed message? Thanks | 0 |
Sure, yet one of the points that kept coming up with the FAC and peer review was that there wasn't enough comparisons. | 0 |
Someday someone will understand who's right and who's left. EOD. | 0 |
Thank you for experimenting with the page Solar power on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. | 0 |
REDIRECT Talk:Abel Smith (1829–1898) | 0 |
Support for same reasons. | 0 |
There is no problem regarding a previous ABC radio interest as that is now defunct. | 0 |
"
Have given it a bit of a polish; I think it needs at least one-paragraph sections about each of the games, a bit about the game universe and how consistent (or not) it's been, and maybe a source that talks about the ""series"" being a significant entity by itself. Another series article like Grand Theft Auto (series) might be a useful model. (And it looks like Elite (series) would be a more appropriate title than Elite series.) Maybe Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games could give some input? " | 0 |
No singers here, I guess. She may well have a 5-octave range, but singers are defined by their *effective* range, not merely the pitch boundaries of their natural range (including the falsetto). However, Carey is a phenomenal singer regardless of her full range. Hell, I have a range of over three octaves, but I'm only effective in slightly under two, i.e. I can really only sing in my effective range. I can *reach* the outer limits of the larger range but I can't sustain pitch accuracy or handle any considerable length of melody. Again, regardless of her range, she's proved many times over that she is effective in most of her range. Vision Of Love remains one of the most remarkable vocal performances I've ever heard. I'd love to hear her sing some of Hildegard von Bingen's music, she's probably the only popular singer who could actually do it with ease. Btw, Billie Holiday was one of the greatest singers yet her full range not broad - some say only about an octave and a half - and she packs more meaning and soul into her renditions than most better-endowed voices. Range is no determinate of anything but boundary conditions, the real news is what gets done within the given range, of course. Again, I think MC is simply phenomenal in that regard. Oh, one word more re: range and I'm gone: Captain Beefheart is also said to have had an enormous vocal range. I love his music too, but he was no MC. )
98.30.29.58 | 0 |
"
Try listening. It goes a long way. –patois
" | 0 |
"
Congratulations from me as well! T " | 0 |
There is nothing promotional about that edit, it is factual. The Seduction Community is not just PUA's, it is an insult to our community that anyone would imply such nonsense. | 0 |
Please note that this is the ip address of a public high school, if you must block, only block the edit ability. | 0 |
Thanks. Happy image taking. | 0 |
<- Don't mind my butting in ) I've indef-ed the three socks but left be for the time being, to give him/her a chance to edit constructively. Ollie, if s/he starts up again (with the unblocked or a new account) just let me know, and I'll take care of it. | 0 |
When he added a source then I stopped reverting the Article(All the Sources had said Urbano Antillon was a Mexican). I Think this person might be a stalking me, Every page I edit he seems to also edit. Since April I always Edit the same Pages but for the last month or so if I edit a Page this person will edit it also. And when they called me a Maldito I got really Mad, I apologize for the stupid comments. | 0 |
"
migraine
where i live, they sell excedrin migrain for approx.$1.00/bottle more than regular excedrin even though they have the exact same ingredients. and people pay it! but don't dare try to explain it to them cuz you get the ""if they're the same, then why would they have different names"" routine. people are goofy.
" | 0 |
P.S. What are you calling nonsense??????? | 0 |
"
Along the same lines, it would be nice if the program recognized the Tawkerbot warnings. I've seen it where a user is listed as have ""No warnings"" but actually they have some from Tawkerbot. " | 0 |
Come to think of it, why is it listed under Wikipedia's Christianity section?? | 0 |
. Perhaps, the warning involving getting other admins involved was the reason why such mails ended? Good guess? I think it is | 0 |
This is a controversial case around the world, not just in America. Many people in the UK (including me) believe that in time, the proceedings so far will prove to have been a major miscarriage of justice and UK newspapers are increasingly reporting it as such e.g. London Evening Standard - 14-10-10. The case is notable, not just as another murder, but for the breathtakingly incompetent nature of the investigation and for the internet wide sociological phenomena of a modern day 'witch hunt' pursued by those who think that Knox and Sollecito are guilty. The entry above illustrates this. The introduction of racism into the debate is unnecessary. The protagonists need to be judged on evidence. Implying that race is a factor is arguably inflammatory and seeks to divert attention from the evidence. It is a good idea for Wikepedia to seek to present as full a picture of the proceedings as possible including the post trial phenomena of internet trolling on the subject. Legal proceedings are ongoing and a second trial is about to start so this story is far from over. | 0 |
"
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to River. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. '''rolls''' " | 0 |
Perhaps you might like to drop a note on the de: page noting User:Chris Peikert's concerns about accuracy? | 0 |
, like nonconvex uniform polyhedron | 0 |
If that's the case than people like Halle Berry(White Mother),Prince (White mother),Irene Cara(Mixed Race), Carly Simon (Mixed Race) should be removed as well. Maybe the tittle should be change from List of black Academy Award winners and nominees to List of Academy Award winners and nominees of African descent. Many of the self identify Blacks on this page have a degree of European, Native American and African blood pumping in their hearts, mabye they should go to since you jackasses don't won't to add Peter Ustinov to this article. | 0 |
Your Global Warming Edit
I deleted your Svensmark add his Galactic Cosmic Ray theory hypothesis for global warming is really just fringe stuff now and not considered a serious alternative explanation anymore, and you were comparing a unpublished paper to a peer-reviewed analysis. Plus he already has way too many refs already on the Global Warming article, and there has been a debate on the Talk page about moving/removing those. -BC aka | 0 |
"first sentence of the article is wrong as it is on 1.22.2010, by 2 counts.
1. It states ~""since 1950"". That would imply a constant temp forever before.
2. It also states ~""projected to continue"". Regardless of the theories, that is not what GW means. AGW means that.
3. Something else is off, but if I explain too much, your head will explode, and you'll just insult me. I cannot deny insults & just cry.
You guys (purposely left out gals) seem to be so non-scientific & picky-ooney, but are still off. Are most of you who are alarmists & cultists also gay? I'm looking to pack fudge.
The " | 0 |
"
Be that as it may, it's still a preface and prefaces are ultimately works of puffery. They are not independent, third-party sources at all. If Pons thought Polak's work was so wonderful, I have to ask why he didn't write a review for Le Monde. In my view, most prefaces are the equivalent of someone putting ""testimonials"" on a business website. It's always good to get ""named"" people because it makes the business (like the author) somehow look better. In any case, it should be removed definitely from the lead and put in a lower part of the text (if at all). Currently, it's misleading to open the article with that citation. " | 0 |
"
BIASED/SELECTIVE EDITING OF WALMART ENTRY
User:Rollback Guy User:Salamuraiand User: Gscshoyru You are hereby charged with adding biased information to the [walmart] wikipedia entry.
Though it is currently unknown exactly WHO added the link to a known corporate propaganda site, records reviewed so far indicate the following:
On 04:29, 30 June 2007 at 0429hrs User:Rollback Guy changed link from ""public relations"" to ""walmart facts""
On 30 July 2007 at 0208hrs User:Salamurai removed mention of and link to wikipedia entry Criticism of Wal-Mart
On 2 August 2007 at 1249hrs, User:Salamurai removed link to news archives of stories concerning walmart yet left link to ""walmart facts"" in place. User claimed that archives was biased, implying that ""walmarts facts"" was not.
On 3 August 2007 at 1652 & 1733hrs, and 5 August 2007 5 August 2007 at 1547hrs, User: Gscshoyru did knowingly restore a link to a walmart promotional site known as ""walmart facts"", claiming the excuse of ""External links to their own website is fine is an article about them, after all""." | 0 |
"
Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Mel_Etitis for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.
talk-email " | 0 |
"
There are two separate issues here, so I've created two sections at Talk:Media Transfer Protocol. – \talk " | 0 |
" (UTC)
Indeed, the Jewish Encyclopedia states in plain English ""Caleb signifies dog"". Your attempts to argue that it is saying something else are bordering on bizarre. You have yet to come up with any alternate sourced derivation. Please stop removing this relevant cited information. /talk/ 05:10, 8 May 2014" | 0 |
I setup the GAN template on the talk page. See the review page (Talk:Chelicerata/GA1). | 0 |
Please don't try to intimidate admins or you will be reported. Thanks. | 0 |
I don't give
I don't give, so shove it! | 0 |
Word origin
The origin of the word Barsoom cannot logically be words [he made up] from the languages spoken by the peoples in his novels. Isn't Barsoom just pig latin for Mars?87.162.29.223 | 0 |
"
True Metal
Listen, I don't wana start a war here, but Manowar call themselves True Metal, also if you need proof read this:
""True Metal is a term coined by the U.S. power metal band Manowar in the 1980s. It was originally used to combat the commercialized glam and pop metal styles of the time. It came into wider use in the 1990s as newer subgenres such as nu-metal and alternative metal came into existence. It is used to differentiate between these non-traditional styles and long-established and integritous forms of Heavy Metal, such as thrash metal, power metal, death metal, black metal, doom metal, and the NWOBHM among others."" Jay316 " | 0 |
"
History
Might I suggest a ""History"" section to this article?12.26.68.146 " | 0 |
Can we please send this to AFD again and do something to insure that there is none of the crap that happened with the past AFDs which were filled with possible sockpuppets. My vote would be to merge the article into the WTVT news team article, but this article is symptomatic of a larger problem no established policy on local TV personalties and if they meet the notablity guidelines. | 0 |
I've just noticed that, on your user page, you have a sub-page entitled IP-Blocking.
What is the point of having a page of guidelines if you don't bother following them yourself? | 0 |
It has its own page on http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/bill-oreilly-you-cant-explain-that . You don't get more official than that in establishing a vital, world-changing meme. | 0 |
YOUR UNDER ARREST
MA NAME IS DI TYLER AND YOUR UNDERARREST BOI | 0 |
Where am I? What happened? | 0 |
"
OK, I said above I won't speak, interact or call the user's place of employment again. You all don't believe me. Semantics cause you to think ""not likely"" means I will call them again, even though I said I won't. Now there is a call for a community ban, I can't defend myself. My record is not a pretty one, but prior to this block, I was a year and a half without a block and the one in 2011 was done by an involved admin (I will let you all debate that). I kept my nose clean, did what I was told, jumped through the hoops, was trusted with access after access, I screw up, admit I screwed up, say it won't happen again, and everyone comes out the pitchforks and torches to run me out of town.
So, let me put it straight out here for you all: I screwed up, I will not call the user's place of employment again, I will not interact with the user. If you all still don't trust me, if you still don't believe me, if you would rather look at the bad rather than the multitude of good, then so be it. Ban me from Wikipedia. But if you all think that the good should overrule the bad, that a royal fuck up is embarrassment enough, that losing the trust of my fellow editors is bad enough, that a public flogging is bad enough, then unblock me, let me do what I said (take TV station and network pages off my watchlist) and try to win your trust back. Because I can't give you anymore than that. - • Talk • " | 0 |
"
EditFilter Idea
I originally posted this to Triplestop, but he suggested I ask you.
I've been looking at the edit filter documentation and I would like to contribute a possible candidate to look for new editors changing birthdates, a fairly common and sneaky problem. I'm not looking for full edit-filter rights, but I would like to help develop the appropriate filter. If you don't have the time to deal with this right now let me know, and I'll engage someone else.
I am new to the syntax, but here's my general format right now:
(user_editcount < 50) & (article_namespace == 0) & (lcase(added_lines) rlike ""dateofbirth *=+|birth ?da(te|y)|\(born |\(b\. "") & (lcase(added_lines) rlike """") & (lcase(removed_lines) rlike """")
Where I have is the birthday searching regex I've been working on. Below is what I've developed so far. I haven't tested it extensively, but I've thrown it against a few BLPs and it works fairly well. It finds the usual ways that birthdays are presented, either in template, or in lead, for example (b. January 1, 2010).
Here's the regex
(date of birth *=+|b\.[^&-]+(&.dash;|-+)|\( *born |birth ?da(te|y) *=+|\() *(([0-3]?[0-9],?)? *(jan|feb|mar|apr|may|jun|jul|aug|sep|oct|nov|dec)\.?[^0-9\.]*([0123]?[0-9],? *)[12][0-9]{3})|(\{\{birth[^\}]+\}\}).*$
I don't know how to check for what specifically was edited, as in if a numerical value was changed. Is Edit Filter able to do this sort of thing? I welcome any other ideas you have. I assume this will require more work. But please let me know how to push this along.
" | 0 |
, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
That's a poor excuse cause to remove it. The artile is about ousting president nasheed not praising. 17:01 | 0 |
were a wide spread tribes who | 0 |
Why Did you delete our post about the world famous Angler John Bailey????
=We manager John Bailey and he is well known in the UK population? We hadnt even finished editing the article you nooob!=====Why Did you delete our post about the world famous Angler John Bailey????
=We manager John Bailey and he is well known in the UK population? We hadnt even finished editing the article you nooob!=====Why Did you delete our post about the world famous Angler John Bailey????
=We manager John Bailey and he is well known in the UK population? We hadnt even finished editing the article you nooob!=====Why Did you delete our post about the world famous Angler John Bailey????
=We manager John Bailey and he is well known in the UK population? We hadnt even finished editing the article you nooob!=====Why Did you delete our post about the world famous Angler John Bailey????
=We manager John Bailey and he is well known in the UK population? We hadnt even finished editing the article you nooob!=====Why Did you delete our post about the world famous Angler John Bailey????
=We manager John Bailey and he is well known in the UK population? We hadnt even finished editing the article you nooob!=====Why Did you delete our post about the world famous Angler John Bailey????
=We manager John Bailey and he is well known in the UK population? We hadnt even finished editing the article you nooob!=====Why Did you delete our post about the world famous Angler John Bailey????
=We manager John Bailey and he is well known in the UK population? We hadnt even finished editing the article you nooob!=====Why Did you delete our post about the world famous Angler John Bailey????
=We manager John Bailey and he is well known in the UK population? We hadnt even finished editing the article you nooob!=====Why Did you delete our post about the world famous Angler John Bailey????
=We manager John Bailey and he is well known in the UK population? We hadnt even finished editing the article you nooob!=====Why Did you delete our post about the world famous Angler John Bailey????
=We manager John Bailey and he is well known in the UK population? We hadnt even finished editing the article you nooob!=====Why Did you delete our post about the world famous Angler John Bailey????
=We manager John Bailey and he is well known in the UK population? We hadnt even finished editing the article you nooob!=====Why Did you delete our post about the world famous Angler John Bailey????
=We manager John Bailey and he is well known in the UK population? We hadnt even finished editing the article you nooob!=====Why Did you delete our post about the world famous Angler John Bailey????
=We manager John Bailey and he is well known in the UK population? We hadnt even finished editing the article you nooob!=====Why Did you delete our post about the world famous Angler John Bailey????
=We manager John Bailey and he is well known in the UK population? We hadnt even finished editing the article you nooob!=====Why Did you delete our post about the world famous Angler John Bailey????
=We manager John Bailey and he is well known in the UK population? We hadnt even finished editing the article you nooob!=====Why Did you delete our post about the world famous Angler John Bailey????
=We manager John Bailey and he is well known in the UK population? We hadnt even finished editing the article you nooob!=====Why Did you delete our post about the world famous Angler John Bailey????
=We manager John Bailey and he is well known in the UK population? We hadnt even finished editing the article you nooob!=====Why Did you delete our post about the world famous Angler John Bailey????
=We manager John Bailey and he is well known in the UK population? We hadnt even finished editing the article you nooob!=====Why Did you delete our post about the world famous Angler John Bailey????
=We manager John Bailey and he is well known in the UK population? We hadnt even finished editing the article you nooob!=====Why Did you delete our post about the world famous Angler John Bailey????
=We manager John Bailey and he is well known in the UK population? We hadnt even finished editing the article you nooob!=====Why Did you delete our post about the world famous Angler John Bailey????
=We manager John Bailey and he is well known in the UK population? We hadnt even finished editing the article you nooob!=====Why Did you delete our post about the world famous Angler John Bailey????
=We manager John Bailey and he is well known in the UK population? We hadnt even finished editing the article you nooob!=====Why Did you delete our post about the world famous Angler John Bailey????
===We manager John Bailey and he is well known in the UK population? We hadnt even finished editing th | 0 |
"
Good Article promotion
Congratulations! Thanks for all the work you did in making 1960 Winter Olympics a certified ""Good Article""! Your work is much appreciated.
Thanks also for your reviews. Featured article candidates and Good Article nominees always need more reviewers! All the best, – (talk)" | 0 |
"
Groan. -) This is another one of those ""specialized usage vs general consistency"" dilemmas that comes up so often. Is WP a general encyclopedia that includes philatelic material, or a union of general and specialized encyclopedias? Secondly, is it a worthwhile effort to fight for a special exception to WP's usual practices? I would say not, because industry usage seems like more of a longstanding convention rather than a key point of fact (I've never seen an ""official"" explanation of the GB preference, for instance), and redirects work well enough to get people to our content (there should be category redirects irrespective of the name chosen). Deletion review or categories for discussion would be the right places to reopen, but based on past experience, ""everybody in philately uses GB"" alone is not going to be compelling enough to get an overturn. " | 0 |
Merge
no point of being part of hempstead as it's listed as its own branch. | 0 |
Please wikify this page. | 0 |
And the article on Obstetric ultrasonography contains an image of an obstetric ultrasound. This isn't the article on obstetric ultrasonography. (A couple of other articles use the cartoons as well, some but not all in contexts I think are unnecessary, but guess what? It's possible to stay on topic. The images are used to prejudice people in favor of one particular choice. They don't contribute anything essential to the article, because people can click links if they want to know what an ultrasound looks like. There is no reason to include them.) (talk ⋅ contribs) | 0 |
South Coast Television
Thank you, Nahnah4, for adding South Coast Television to Category:Stubs. However, you should always try to find the most appropriate stub category to place an article in.
Thanks! | 0 |
I noticed that someone had removed the retired tag he put there. | 0 |
" and describe what help you need. Someone will reply very quickly - usually within a few minutes.Play in your user area. For example, create User:Jjalan/test.Edit existing articles, before you make your own. Look at some subjects that you know about, and see if you can make them a bit better. For example, Wikipedia:Cleanup#2009.When you're ready''', read about Your first article. It should be about something well-known, and it will need references.
Good luck with editing; please drop me a line some time on my own talk page.
There's lots of information below. Once again, welcome to the fantastic world of Wikipedia!
►
Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored
How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Frequently asked questions • Tips
Where to ask questions or make comments
Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research
Verifiability • Grade sources • Cite sources
What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons
External links • Spam • Vandalism
Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists • Best articles
Build consensus • Resolve disputes
Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette
No personal attacks • No legal threats Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article
The perfect article • Manual of style
Pages needing attention • Peer review
The missing manual
|}" | 0 |
MCOG remake
something needs to be mentioned about the [MCOG sequel relased lately]... | 0 |
OK. We'll wait till April 14th. | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.