text stringlengths 1 29.3k ⌀ | label float64 0 1 |
|---|---|
"
But, to use this analogy, the topic of this article is not ""vandalism"", but ""house painting"". Some house painting may be vandalism, others may not, but they are both house painting. what you are suggesting is that an article on ""house painting"" be limited to instances of house painting which are vandalism - very clearly an artificial limitation.
" | 0 |
Sorry - this is a list of all lines. | 0 |
"
With due respect this dog's breakfast of an article deserves a POV rampage and a much more exhaustive one than the minor changes made on December 11. Please look over some of the undocumented, irrelevant, and in some cases just plain weird interpretations of Revelation that were removed or edited and suggest which edits should be undone. The article as a whole is unnecessarily repetitive and only a small fraction of it represents the views of modern scholarship (see my comments above under Talk section 11: Everyone's view).
On Thomas Jefferson: Myth America I sympathise with your concern to '[provide] a useful contrast to the other interpretations in the article' which generally reflect conservative christian in-fighting about the meaning of the book but tell us very little about Revelation itself. I'm not convinced, however, that to dismiss the work as the incoherent ravings of an early christian ""heretic"" (Cerinthus) is the best way to do this. A number of scholars have demonstrated that the book follows a clearly marked concentric structure which evidences balanced literary construction, while it has long been acknowledged that Revelation parodies and inverts the imagery of first century roman imperialism and the emperor cult in particular to make it's point (see eg Steven J Friesen's recent work in this area: Imperial Cults and the Apocalypse of John). This hardly supports Jefferson's view that the work is a meaningless rant but nor does it support the highly subjective perspectives of historicism and futurism which have obviously irritated you. A balanced, well documented historical-critical introduction to the work should, in my opinion, make up the bulk of this article with other conservative christian approaches acknowledged separately in brief, concise fashion. I am quite happy for the Jefferson reference to remain for its whimsical value and tentatively suggest that it could be accompanied by some of the numerous historical warnings by prominent christian leaders and commentators about the danger of misusing the book.
I also note that the reference to Mithraic parallels has been re-inserted in the Authorship section. What this has to do with the question of authorship I have no idea. The parallel itself is completely unconvincing and the book from which it is taken is a typical example of an author falling in love with his subject and unnecessarily exaggerating its importance. While I don't deny that the work, by Payam Nabarz, represents a good layman's guide to Mithraism the suggested parallel between this quote and Revelation 1:4-20 on page 51 (see Google books for the text) hardly warrants the preface that the two are 'almost identical' or the overly enthusiastic observation that 'the [similarity of] spirit is abundant... to the extent that the names of Jesus and Mithras could be interchangeable'. These are not the remarks of a careful exegete. It is quite likely that there are echoes of Mithraism, the religion of the roman army, in Revelation, which freely reuses both Jewish and greco-roman mythology in polemical fashion, but this is not one of them. Would anyone object to a re-removal of this paragraph?
""this... article deserves a POV rampage""— All I can say to that is read this WP:NPOV.
Why not be inclusionist instead of deleting chunks of information you don't personally agree with? An encylopedia is supposed to present all legitimate views, not stick with just one/the most popular. Whatsmore Thomas Jefferson's opinion isn't just ""whimsical"", it's representative of many historical figures views. •¿talk? " | 0 |
"
I uploaded an extra copy in case the site goes down again. Talk " | 0 |
A big welcome to you. If I can help, please write to me on my talk page. I really, really, really, really, really, really, really, strongly suggest you change your user name. Just register a new one and abandon this one. Happy editing. | 0 |
Pasca Ucchjtta: Mirella Freni,Anghilesa Furitta: Helga Müller-Molinari,Battista Burédda: Piero Cappuccilli,Gjompàulu Filianu: Ruggero Raimondi
|Tanglewood Festival Chorus,Boston Symphony Orchestra | 0 |
"
Possibly unfree Image:Budva nocu.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Budva nocu.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
Possibly unfree Image:Budva.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Budva.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
Possibly unfree Image:Budva CG.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Budva CG.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
Possibly unfree Image:Sveti Stefan CG.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Sveti Stefan CG.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
Possibly unfree Image:Sveti Stefaa.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Sveti Stefaa.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
Possibly unfree Image:Milocer.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Milocer.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
Possibly unfree Image:Plavi Horizonti.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Plavi Horizonti.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
Possibly unfree Image:MarinaBar.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:MarinaBar.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
Possibly unfree Image:Ulcin.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ulcin.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not bein | 0 |
"
May 2008
You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.
Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.
If you are not ""notable"" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) " | 0 |
"
Image Tagging Image:Cow Cake.png
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:Cow Cake.png. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. " | 0 |
- First of all, it's not me, but consensus of Wiki editors over the years. Second, the two links I gave above are really what Wikipedia seems to be looking for. Definitely keep the citations (or simply use them as basic references), but summarize what they say in your own words. I hope this helps. | 0 |
"
Actually, now that I've read the ""smallest planet in our solar system"" bit, it does seem pretty damn mean. Who decides what articles go which days again? " | 0 |
"
She actually appeared in 3 episodes of ""In the Motherhood"" go their freakin' website and watch the shows! You can't always trust imdb! They don't even have all the episodes for ""In the Motherhood"" up! And she hasn't been on Days of Our Lives for less than a month! Go look at a calendar! She's been on for well over a month and like i've said before, is nearing her 18th episode in the middle of this week!" | 0 |
, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
You can classify lower also, Infrasubspecies is next down on the hierachy of Biological classification, but how tongue-tied need we get on the talkpage? Let's get on with the issues and leave the semantics to the trolls to squabble over 11:12 | 0 |
Yet another locked article. What is with the NDP, first they smeared Hunter when he was alive and now they send their wikipedia attack queers to make certain that the truth is not mentioned here. | 0 |
Not sure what you are saying. United Kingdom is England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. Great Britain is an island containing the countries of Scotland, Wales and England. Are you saying that the codes in the table do not apply in Northern Ireland? | 0 |
"
All this trouble just because DNyhagen wasn't allowed to plug his commercial website
I think it's time that we get the Admins in on this. We can't let one disgrunted commercial website owner, Dennis Nyhagen, reduce the value Wikipedia users get by robbing them of free OTR shows simply because he wasn't allowed to use Wikipedia to earn himself a few bucks by charging for the same shows. Now that Denny is disgruntled he is attempting to destroy his ""competition"" seeing how his ""competition"" offers his ""services"" to be given away for free. Denny, you see, some people do things for the good of the public, not to fill their pockets with $7.50/Gig downloads. Wikipedia is a great example of that, although you may think that Wikipedia should charge users for access. I couldn't help but read your website and how you insult visitors who download shows for free by calling them ""bottom feeders"". Denny, they are not bottom feeders. Many of them simply don't have access to Paypal, or live on a fixed income, or live in a 3rd world country where your $7.50/Gig download translates into a lot of money in their local currency. The person who is the real bottom feeder in my mind isn't the listeners, but rather it is someone else. " | 0 |
No problem - that is the strength of Wikipedia: collaboration! You don't have to get it perfect on your own. I have changed the tag to indicate that it lacks footnotes, rather than refs since you have added the refs. It is probably easier to add footnotes as an article is being written, rather than after the fact, which, as you point out would be a lot of work now. When I had the refs, such as in the case of V-Speeds I have been able to reference a list like this in the past retroactively, but I don't have the refs for this article. I think the article is very useful and I hope that it will be retained and expanded over time. Thanks for starting it! - | 0 |
"
Queue 2
Hi, just a quick heads up - I see you have just moved a prep area into queue 2; I don't know if you have seen the discussion taking place at here ? I'm just an onlooker but I'm not sure if it has yet been resolved? - Chat " | 0 |
In fact, every single sentence from ISTB351's comment on the LP talk page seems to be directly lifted from various remarks on Irvine22's user talk between November 16th and 18th, 2009! | 0 |
"
TFD and Andy, the arguments in your last post are invalid. Sourcing coverage requirements are for presence of material in the article, and for the existence of an article (which gun control certainly fulfills and ""gun politics"" might fulfill) not for the comparison of the two words, and not for talk page discussions outside of the above two. Lot's of people try to do the two step process and say that it applies to all talk page discussions (which is wrong) and also try to create a situation of ""my unsourced opinion wins unless you meet the very high bar of finding a wp:rs that addresses and refutes my unsourced opinion"" Which is what both of you are trying to do here with your assertion that the two terms are synonymous. So such is invalid on several levels. Sincerely, North8000 " | 0 |
"
Needing Wiki contribution assistance!
Greetings Bn bt ec01,
I am looking for an experienced Wikipedian to contribute an article for our band Mr. Meeble. I have checked and we meet the Wikipedia ""notability"" guidelines for a band. We have a very basic Wikipedia article written already, but I know that someone like yourself may be able to point out our formatting errors and critical omissions. You can hear our music and see our videos here:
http://youtube.com/mrmeeble
http://soundcloud.com/meeble
Let me know if you would be willing to help!
Regards,
Devin
mm @ meeble.com
" | 0 |
Lednicer even says it with his own words if you read pages 94-95 in his steroid book: | 0 |
So I'm not allowed to put anything down about freddy because the freddy fan dreaded walrus goes ape crap. I went ahead and changed everything and left out things that were not in the articles. going to come back with the articles and post it later but I cant do that cuz dreaded walrus aka freddy adu's biggest fan refuses to have anyone change his precious unproved POV of his favorite soccer player freddy adu | 0 |
"
A tag has been placed on Baron Donald George von Vister, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. t/c " | 0 |
Okay I'll stick with the title. I feel like it's a bit skimpy, but I'm not sure what good examples I'm missing. | 0 |
"
Can anyone tell me how someone for the job actually BECAME an admin here? I mean, other than being being appointed by a friend or cronie....Now, is there a way to nominate someone for de-administration? " | 0 |
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you make a personal attack, as you did with this edit to User talk:Jake M. Yore. | 0 |
Ground Glass - Urban Legend?
In 1977 the ChapStick company was indicted on the charge of including ground glass in several of their lip-balm products.
This looks exactly like an urban legend mention in the Lip_balm article:
There are some urban legends stating that lip balm manufacturers add special chemicals or even fiberglass to their product to facilitate lip chapping, but none of these claims have ever been proven.
I suggest we remove it, unless some credible evidence is provided. | 0 |
Look the Indian AEC gave me the book. There is no copyright it it. I have uploaded large sections of it with their assistance. See: http://www.lenr-canr.org/Collections/BARC.htm. This particular autoradiograph is my personal property (a Christmas present from a researcher). It is the same as the one on the book because they made hundreds of images from that cathode. It is like making multiple copies from one negative.
How can there be a problem? This makes no sense. Researchers hand out sample data like this all the time, in every laboratory. | 0 |
Hi 60.242.186.80, thanks for your observations. Please feel free to make the changes you suggest, anyone can edit here. Best regards | 0 |
Sockpuppet investigation about you and Teen ape.
It's here. | 0 |
relationship, which is more than you can do, please give me a sensible reason you removed my post. And i dare ask you if i was lying | 0 |
I actually use a few characters as my main ones.I am a fox/falco, link/young link main(Soon to be Meta Knight, fox, and dark link which is links costume change.). Did you see the youtube vids on ssbb with dark link in them? If you want to play as meta knight now, play a game called Super Smash Flash. Use Kirby and if you press the attack button he turns into meta knight. How do you survive as Jiggly against anyone with link or fox? For me, since I am really bad with Jiggly I use him when I have a pushover fight. | 0 |
information regarding epilepsy is distorted on this page. some examples:
gengis cahan was epileptic and used the seizures to show his strength.
julis ceasure was epileptic.
overall epilepyics show higher levels of intelegence.
thes statements can be verified by Rush Presbyterian St. Lukes Medical center:Seizure Clinic in Chicago, il.
Most patients any place else will never be properly diagnosed. brain mapping discovered by Dr. Frank Morrell allows the actual cause and location of the disturbance in the brain.
the only purpose of other facilities hiding this information is profits.
as a patient that was a victim of these frauds, dr morrell was able to remove a begnine tumor on my right temporal lobe. i have been seizure free since may 22,1981. the only thing he could not remove with his knife was all the mis information that has become a stigma that has destroyed my life from 1981 to now june 22,2014
donald yakel
116 depalma st.
sierra vista,az. 85635
520-459-3310 | 0 |
You should not be voting, as you are nominator. | 0 |
"
I'll stop nothing that includes the truth, and what I state is the truth.
We ""are not"" The Mutts American Band.
IF you want to do this, you label The Mutts UK...as they took the name after the fact.
We are...The Mutts." | 0 |
Hey!
Who do you think you are?! Continue to talk about Adolf Hitler in that way and you will be banned from wikipedia!!! | 0 |
User:CardMaster21
This guy plagiarized your userpage. | 0 |
Yes, it's excellent and very helpful. That crew do a really dedicated job on the JBC classics. | 0 |
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. t c | 0 |
Given what happens in Esther, it is clear that the reference to Haman as an Agagite is meant to say that he is descended from, or shares the ideas of, the Amalekites. Having it be his hometown or family name would be an irrelevant detail that plays no part in what happened. | 0 |
"
Fair comment. The problem obviously lies in the precise form of words, not the concept. We could try different things. Does anyone else have ideas about it? I would prefer myself we don't use anything like ""many"", ""often"", ""generally"" etc, but now I look at it, I don't much like my own use of ""dislike""! Any more for any more? " | 0 |
I'm just shocked at how quickly I was railroaded. I understand that it's not cool to use those words, but it's far less cool for the words he used to be anywhere on wikipedia, even an AfD page. And for what it's worth, I felt it was a description of his actions/words, not a name-calling - it's not rude to say that about Apartheid or Nazism. It seems like there were a few other admins who came on that ANI board after I had been blocked and were the first ones to actually discuss the true issue, i.e. evidence of views expressing a systematic bias being a problem with objectivity when an article's deletion is at stake. It seems like that other user was the baiter and then, being the first to complain (I don't even know how), he got what he wanted, and I had no chance for appeal. This was an especially dirty trick since this happened as the election of which the subject of the article was a candidate's results were being announced and, had he won, I would've wanted to (and been in the best position to) update his article accordingly. Thank you for the somewhat quick and painless resolution, but this whole experience has left me pretty upset with this blocking procedure. It should not have been done so quickly like I was some anonymous IP (been editing for over 6 years, have created dozens of articles) and I should have had a chance to appeal, or at least get judged on the merits of the issue, not just on what kind of grease the squeakiest wheel wanted. | 0 |
Image source problem with Image:Lil Jon.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Lil Jon.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. | 0 |
"
By the way, it's not Chu nom, but Han tu. Chu nom is only for ideographs of words that are native to Vietnamese, and are not Chinese-origin words. For example, the Han tu of Trung Quoc is 中国. | —Talk contribs email " | 0 |
Kobe Bryant & Jason Kidd edits | 0 |
I have a book of Willy Ley's called The Lungfish, the Dodo and the Unicorn: An Excursion into Romantic Zoology. This sounds similar to the book Exotic Zoology but was first published in 1948, with a second printing in 1951. Are they the same book, perhaps with revisions and a less-silly title? | 0 |
Samur Gunj
The WP:BLPPROD procedure is for unreferenced articles about living people. This article has a reference and, by several centuries, is not about a living person. Please refrain from tagging any more articles for deletion until you have familiarised yourself with our policies and guidelines. | 0 |
kudos!
this article is really really good! well done everyone! 02:52, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC) | 0 |
Thanks for reverting vandalsim on my userpage. -) | 0 |
Please help me about getting free photos of Sports. | 0 |
"
Thanks a lot for your answer! I've understood your points. I've collected material for my article in russian about cross/stake, which consists of more than 700 files (article, pics and so). But as I remember I there is no quatations from ""Philo, Xenophon and Josephus"" concerning the matter. When I tried to find such a evidence in Google it gave only link to anti-JW sites. Can you help me a little bit more with that referencies, please? ) " | 0 |
Hello Darkwarriorblake, in regards to the cast of Prometheus, I ask permission to add bullets to the names of Sean Harris and Rafe Spall. Firstly, I think it would help highlight the information that their characters pertain, and their quotes on the film. I think it's a safe assumption that the two are relevant enough to be highlighted as the two were named in the opening credits (as opposed to Benedict Wong and Emun Elliot). It would be very much appreciated, thank-you. | 0 |
Add Criticism to Global Warming. How can this not be included already? Oh yeah, that's right. Wiki is a left wing propaganda machine. | 0 |
talk) 17:51, 19 February 2010 (UTC | 0 |
Notable reviews
Most of the reviews are from non-notable locations. Shall we prune them? | 0 |
Speedy deletion of Template:Infobox college inline hockey team
A tag has been placed on Template:Infobox college inline hockey team requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes ({{transclusionless}}).
Thanks. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk | 0 |
Spadework
Hi there again, please let me know how I can help out in the collaborative effort you mentioned last week. I'm actually pretty inexperienced when it comes to getting articles up to GA standard but might be able to help out in terms of spadework, copy editing, etc. Cheers | 0 |
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Brandstatter
Please take a moment and comment whether this article should or should not be deleted. | 0 |
What on earth is your problem? There was no personal attack. First, I can't read your name, hence chuckwagon (which is what it looks like to me). Second, your comments are far from useful. Advising a user to purchase a new computer because another user's signature does not display properly is not helpful, and could be considered a personal attack in itself. Once again, please stop posting that remark on my talk page. | 0 |
Western Ukrainian POWs in Polish camps
Would you please contribute, if you have sources?
Talk:Camps for Russian prisoners and internees in Poland (1919-1924) | 0 |
I'm not an IMer. That's not a hostile response, it's just a fact. I don't even know how to do an IM, and to the extent I am familiar with it I've disabled it because of all the warnings about viruses. In any case, it's 12:30 in the morning here in Seattle and I've got to get off to bed. We can continue this later. Incidentally, I've been in contact with the USMC, and I expect to get a reasonably complete copy of the investigative report on Sanchez. Will that be an acceptable secondary source, or will there be some Wikipedia pillar principle that will be used to omit it? | 0 |
Looks like a content dispute to me, and I don't think I'm the best person to look into it. Et tu, Brute? | 0 |
"
Disturbing trend to whitewash history
I have noticed that some contributors to this article seem to be desperate to wash over the parallels between Islam and Islamist terrorism. You need not look further than the term ""Islamist terrorism"" itself, which is improper grammar in English. I believe that the term is preferred to ""Islamic terrorism"" because the latter seems, in their minds, to connote that terrorism is sanctioned in the religion. I personally despise this kind of thinking because it assumes that the reader is a moron who cannot discover the truth. I have seen this kind of handling of controversial subjects in other articles. I have even seen attempts to delete articles of that type from Wikipedia. I should probably note here that I am a liberal with no agenda here other than to comment. I just hate seeing this kind of desperate attempt to conceal the truth. Deal with the subject head-on and do not shy away from the harsh reality. - " | 0 |
I did not abuse and threaten - another user came there out of nowhere and started a crisis by making abusive personal attacks on me. I had to defend against them, to every person who refused to ignore them. It was not threatening to state the serious wrongs that would be committed if Wikipedia claimed to even have even in theory any discretionary choice not to take entirely my side as the victim in such a situation. The situation was an offence. Any organisation that decides to take offence at being told it does not have a discretionary choice to bully, is corrupt. Admins here take personal bullying decisions without there being a defence process to go through that is judged by more than just the first other passing admin who acts on whim. Nobody can lose all rights without a defence process. What you have just said does not add up legally. You have put Wikipedia on public record as blaming victims. There is no prevention here, of mob rule. The public has to be warned so. | 0 |
"Almost overwhelmingly, the Buddha is not viewed as ""God"" by Buddhists - but there are aspects of Mahayana and Tantric Buddhism that come very close to (if not enter into) a panentheistic or ""theos-en-panist"" (""God in all"") vision of the ultimate ""Adibuddha"" (see the Wiki entry, God in Buddhism). " | 0 |
Have put a word in, not sure if you'll like my comments! .., talk | 0 |
Citing sources
Please use proper citations when sourcing. You can find out more at WP:CITE. | 0 |
"Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thanks. Talk " | 0 |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR#User:Ghirlandajo_.28Short_description:_troller.2C_vandal.2C_Anti-Romanian.2C_nazi.29 revert war, block please, severe block. | 0 |
That block - which as you will note was removed by another administrator after review - was applied by an administrator whose understanding of the rules of Wikipedia and basic courtesy were as flawed as your own. Your tone is rude, arrogant, and threatening. I do not care to have any further contact with you. Thank you. - | 0 |
"
Please take a look at the archives. This has been brought up time and time again and has been clarified just as many times as well. 3:16 " | 0 |
, and note that this seems to be Grant65 versus all comers, which is never a good sign | 0 |
Long story short - stop picking on the dregs, the useless, and the retards of Wikipedia. | 0 |
I did not know, sorry. | 0 |
"\
The Signpost: 01 October 2014
Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
Please comment on Talk:List of Patriarchs of Alexandria
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of Patriarchs of Alexandria. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. —
This week's article for improvement (week 41, 2014)
Hello, Calidum.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:
Previous selections:
Get involved with the TAFI project! You can...
Posted by: on behalf of •
Please comment on Talk:Iranian-led intervention in Iraq
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Iranian-led intervention in Iraq. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. —
The Signpost: 08 October 2014
'''Read this Signpost in full' | 0 |
REDIRECT Talk:State ratifying conventions | 0 |
"
The Spirit Rangers
Ok we seem to be having an edit war with people removing the Spirit Ranger info.
1. They have appeared in the show already, and the new episode has aired on Jetix XD which elaboartes further that the Spirit Rangers are projections of the Masters Spirits (and the Masters are good)
2. An argument was made that they probably wouldn't be around after this story arc was over, well Cat Ranger and Nova Ranger only had one episode appearances and are listed as Rangers.
3. preview scans in Terebi Magazine show the Spirit Rangers fighting agains the Rinshi WITH the Rangers..so thye will be turning good, images of ""Red Korag"" from the same magazine were used to illustrate that Koragg would be joining the Mystic Force Rangers long before he actually turned into Wolf Warrior, but we have to wait two weeks before I'm proven right and get to repost this information.
There is no reason to keep removing this information at all. It is factual and taken from the very show that ALL the info on this article is taken from. " | 0 |
to everybody at Wikipedia | 0 |
This isn't a place to sell Bahram Jalali
The irrelevant reference to Bahram Jalali's other works such as AST are distracting and pompous. They need to go. I propose we clean this article up and add some math. | 0 |
Yoga
Hi Ekabhishek. Please look at a series of edits by a new user Goodfaith17 in Yoga from 31 August onwards. It seems he is trying to portray Yoga as a Buddhist-alone concept. At several places you will find him removing the word 'Hindu' or changing templates to change the appearance of the article. Please look into the matter. - | 0 |
Hubie McDonough]] or [[ | 0 |
"
Oh, and I checked the footnote for the ""never been banned for anti-mosquito use,"" and the reference is some sort of general page that says no such thing. 206.124.6.222 " | 0 |
I think (obviously), if an edit is in bad taste and came from an IP, it obviously needs to be blocked. | 0 |
I have added links to some pages with some excellent pictures. None of mine are worth publishing- | 0 |
Should it be of similar size or larger?
Should it state that Giganotosaurus is larger than T-Rex when they have the same hip height? With Giga only being longer than T-Rex however T-Rex was more robust than Giga. What do ya'll think? mcelite | 0 |
icic, well you learn something new everyday!haha | 0 |
Pedophilia controversy
Critics of the APA have claimed, among other things, that the organization has adopted a moderate attitude towards pedophilia, which is a rather serious charge because it supposes that the notion of sexual orientation can be spontaneously broadened by members of liberal academiia. | 0 |
How was my comments to you disruptive (I thought they were informative and polite!!)122.109.127.168 | 0 |
Note to SamEV - Correcting spanish americans article
I don't know what you're talking about. I didn't vandalize any article. Stop accusing me of vandalizism because I don't do that and you know it. You're saying this to make me look bad to wiki and it's not fair.
All I did was reflect correct info that the author of the article has made an error in. The author made an error in the article pertaining to what constitutes a spanish american. In the aritcle he states that anyone from latin america is considered a spanish american when that's not true! A spanish american is someone who is descended DIRECTLY (note this) from spain and born in the americas. For example, mexican-born or argentine-born peloples ARE NOT spanish americans since they are born in latin america, NOT spain. I want to work with the aurthor, but the aurthor has got to work with us, the people who are trying to correct him. You're not spanish so you don't have the right to dictate to others who or what they are. | 0 |
In short, I don't have a problem with inclusion of the monarch, just the way it's presented, which will confuse those unfamiliar with the subject. | 0 |
Thanks. I still have a mind to propose it for deletion, but this time there's no rush. First, you need to have an opportubity to add some actual sources for the article. - talk/email | 0 |
Ok, I've re-read the change, and I am afraid I don't see how it suggest that Rezko was being investigated during the land deal, or that it was the land deal that he was busted for. It seems to actually go out of its way to state that it is unrelated. Perhaps I am misunderstanding? | 0 |
Sup friend
sup bro
http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=2587275&userid;=0&perpage;=40&pagenumber;=1 | 0 |
"
Cade Productions, LLC
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Cade Productions, LLC, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? —EncMstr (talk) " | 0 |
one of us, one of us... gooble ggggchkkk ∴ here…♠ | 0 |
causing agent and this is the place you're going to see on all the cleansers chemicals shampoos tolling on you were talking kidney harm liver harm in a ghetto week kidney harm is not one of those sifted organs the organ channels so be harm the kidneys were going to show up skin I know in an enthusiasm for dioxin you know late like the bosom and prostate malignancy krill connected when we take a gander at this the antibacterial cleansers at the American Medical Association even says there's no proof that they're great and in these fellows are not a sharp assaulting a bundle OK you know when we take a gander at end utilizing antibacterial cleansers may upset hormones and this is after the diary and ecological Bio Lift Anti Aging Eye Cream science and innovation yet I watch a glance at some mid year those in this is the trap Los am the trap Los an is thisanti microscopic organisms or are at the run of the mill the anti-microbial that is blended in with these items would you be able to envision Colgate toothpaste OK with an antibacterial in it affirm that causes disease that that makes a focused situation in the mouth that you're gulping that that is going to likewise make an aggressive domain in the gut when you take a gander at this present its found in human bosom drain its an endocrine disruptor that is that is the place the prostate.
httpeyebornfactsorg/bio-lift-anti-aging-eye-cream/ | 0 |
Here is at least one account, . They just thanked me for revoking their talk page access. GB fan | 0 |
"::::I agree with Cmart. Gil-White is, in my mind, even *more* of an expert in these fields than many of the journalists who cover these topics and are linked to and cited, simply because he has spent so long doing academic research into them. What possible reason do you have to repress his views other than the fact that you don't agree with him, which isn't a reason at all? Talk
" | 0 |
Incidently, the ignorant only ignores the truth. | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.