text stringlengths 1 29.3k ⌀ | label float64 0 1 |
|---|---|
I'd appreciate it if you would quote where in the policy satire is identified as unacceptable. | 0 |
"
The phrasing that I especially had problems with is the ""defacto independent state"" - which seems to be sourced to a non-working link at some site called defencesecurity.org. Do we even know what kind of an organisation that is?" | 0 |
"
Hey sheep. Thanks for collecting the refs. Nice work. Although I'm unsure what you want us to do with them. I saw on your sandbox that you were working on the T-rex article. So does this mean you will be adding the refs, and you want us to... do what? Sort out the best references? Or have you abandoned you plan to work on your sandbox article, and you want us to add the references ourselves? Or...? Sorry if this seems obvious, but I don't quite ""get"" what you want us to do here. Whatever it is, I'm more than willing to give it a go. ) Happy editing. " | 0 |
"
No, they are clearly spam links and not allowed. Go out for a walk if you are truly bored. [talk... contribs...] " | 0 |
Support Daniel Jennings dab? | 0 |
Considering the Deletionists won't allow a section abt a sequal that is being released, I don't think there's any hope of you beating the anti-fact people. | 0 |
Back in the day...before Zlykinskyja got herself banned with her pilgrimrose sign-on...when the trial was still in progress is was reasonable to balance the arguments for Knox's guilt and innocence.
- Now that she's been found guilty, it seems ridiculous to keep bringing up the arguments for her innocence that were soundly rejected by the trial court.
- How many times does it need to be said that Knox's Mommy and Daddy don't think she's guilty?
- How the murder occured is clearly laid out in the judges narrative, and that is what should be lifted into this article to explain this crime.
- Every piece of evidence does not need a notation attached to it that Knox disagrees. Everyone gets that Knox claims she's innocent.
- Zlykinskyja needs to get the the court rejected Knox's claim of innocence.
- Knox has been in prison for what will soon be 3 years for this crime. Every judge at every level on every issue has rules against Knox on this case. There is no miracle that awaits Knox. She's in prison for the crime, and there she will stay.
-
- You're wasting your time with Zlykinskyja. She will settle for nothing less than her way. 10 years from now she will her declaring Knox's innocence. She has no interest in compromise on this. As she has clearly shown by continuing to edit the article. She has an agenda, and it doesn't involve being reasonable. | 0 |
and BTW, I created an account in the french wikipedia under the same name as this one about a month ago but not for any reason AND that did happen WAY before any of these problems did occur and if you have noticed i had not even used that account and even forgot I created it. But so what? its the same name as this one and i didnt know that i am not allowed to use other wikipedias. Papphase edits over here AND in the german wikipedia, so tell me exactly why you now say i was confirmed of creating another account for the sole purpose of impersonation? impersonating who? myself?
how obsurd !!!! all you had to do was ask and i would have said yes i created an account in the french wikipedia but decided to use the english one instead....
geesh, whats WRONG with you people!?! yall are harrassing me!!!! im not harrassing anyone! IVE BEEN DEFENDING MYSELF !!!! Give me a break!!!! | 0 |
"
I thank you for your warning and I respect you administrating articles. However, I do not personally see my edit as vandalism. I do admit, however, that openly saying he is a ""crazed lunatic"" was the incorrect way to go about doing things. I believe in the merits of wikipedia and that it should strive for truth and excellence. There is absolutely no place in the current article about Camping that states science disagrees with his statements. Instead, the only mentions of disagreement are ""As a result, some individuals have criticized him for 'date-setting'"" and ""they [a ministry] believe his entire method of Bible interpretation is flawed."" If you would like, I can pen a section about the invalidity of his arguments from a fact-based scientific stance. If I cannot do it, someone most certainly should. Otherwise, wikipedia is no more than a medium for which inaccurate science can propagate through the minds of the public. When looking at a page such as homeopathy's, the second sentence reads ""The collective weight of scientific evidence has found homeopathy to be no more effective than a placebo."" Do you not think statements such as those made by Camping should get the same treatment? On a final note, 24 hours from now nearly the entire article I edited will be proven nonsense. The second sentence under this text box states ""Encyclopedic content must be verifiable."" Yet, despite this, the second paragraph of his page states:
""He has used Bible-based numerology to predict dates for the end of the world.[2] His current end times prediction is that the Rapture will be on May 21, 2011 and that God will completely destroy the Earth and the universe five months later on October 21.[3][4] He had previously predicted that the Rapture would occur in September 1994.[5]""
The only verifiable thing regarding these predictions is that they are wrong, yet that statement is nowhere to be found. Tomorrow evening, or Sunday if you wish, please add the sentence ""He was wrong about both of his previous predictions"" to the opening paragraphs of his page.
" | 0 |
That statement repeats, and confirms, exactly what I said in the first paragraph of the post you are responding to.
To focus this discussion, do you think that 'sometimes referred to as Cornish nationalism, a term which supporters dislike because they feel it unfairly conflates a desire for cultural autonomy with ethnocentrism or racism' might improve on the blanket condemnation of nationalism as pejorative? | 0 |
"
Done -Thanks for the correction suggested. -Let's talk! " | 0 |
"21, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
I gladly admit that this is a weak spot for me, and I don't handle it well. Hey, in my dreams I'm still naked, trying to run away, and I can't remember how to even walk.
I guess we all have bad dreams. My recurring nightmare is turning up for my A-level exams - the ones we have to take here to get into university - knowing absolutely nothing about the subjects. And then having to go back and spend another three years in school, which just doesn't happen here. I even wake up in a sweat sometimes, wondering whether I actually passed or not. Corbett 03:" | 0 |
It's just a reference to the fact that Pokémon (which Ling-Ling is a parody of) are almost never addressed with a gendered pronoun on the anime. | 0 |
I believe that the troops that are staying are helping to train the Iraqi army and police, as well as Iraqi intelligence. At the very least, that's the impression I've gathered from this. '''''' | 0 |
"
-
That is P.R.; you are confusing it for NPOV fact. I would also like it if you would please refrain from insults and personal observations.""]] 16:45, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)" | 0 |
- Sagarika Malhotra
- Janine Santiago
- Alexandra Martínez | 0 |
Thanks for the info | 0 |
", 16 December 2010 (UTC)
I'm sorry to disagree but, at Wikipedia, secondary sources trump primary sources. This seeming contradiction to your experience with academic papers actually makes perfect sense when you understand the rationale. When you write an academic paper using primary sources, you are performing ""original research"" based on your understanding of the sources. Whether your work is respectable and legitimate enough to be considered by the academic community is based on some sort of peer review (usually a peer-reviewed journal or an editor at a respectable publishing company). Wikipedia has no such mechanism for vetting submissions and so it relies on the concept of a verifiable reliable source which, in plain English, means ""a published source which has been through some kind of peer-review process"". If a Wikipedia editor writes text that is based primarily on primary sources, he is vulnerable to the charge of performing ""original research"". All we can say is ""Unknown Wikipedian X believes A, B and C based on his own interpretation of the primary sources."" If we cite a secondary source, at least we can say ""Published author Y asserts A, B and C based on his peer-reviewed interpretation of the primary sources."" There is still room to debate how reliable ""published author Y"" is (he could represent a fringe POV, for instance). However, in such a debate, Wikipedians bring more information from other secondary sources to either assert or refute the reliability of ""Published author Y"". The basic principle here is ""not published => not reliable"". And self-published doesn't count. 18:09" | 0 |
Your request at WP:FFU | 0 |
"
Editorial issues
There are points where Highsmith betrays her lack of familiarity with 1980s New York City. I'd like to find a source that comments on this. I find it distracting and careless, and I wonder why her publisher, UK or US, didn't think these things worth fixing. No New Yorker has ever ordered a ""white coffee"" or handed someone a ""fiver"" or written ""The Bronx"" with a capital T. By the 1980s the police were not ""the fuzz"", even ironically, and Chelsea is Chelsea or perhaps the Chelsea neighborhood, never ""the Chelsea district"". The video arcade where Ralph works is on Eighth Avenue in the 80s, which doesn't exist, since that's Central Park West. Then, without explanation, it's on Broadway in the 80s. And nowhere in the West 80s would one have found anything like the arcade as described, not even in the 80s when NYC was going through a very rough period. " | 0 |
Compacttoc uses
I suggest that there be NO compacttoc, as and had an edit war over this, i feel th compacttoc be removed. | 0 |
Witney college is well awesome.
amirite? | 0 |
Who is the acting President?
Which Ratu is the acting President? - ( ) | 0 |
"
ah, but the things Yomangani could do with the wording -) (Talk) " | 0 |
XM-8 and XM-25
I believe that this page deserves the information that the XM29 is to have both componets designed into their own weapons the XM-8 Rifle (the rifle component) and the XM-25 Grenade launcher (although its grenades have been upped to 25mm from 20mm). Division of program resulting for action in 2004. | 0 |
e-mail
You've got mail. Please give me a ping. | 0 |
"STOP DELETING MY ADDITION. You, Muboshgu, say: 'You are using the talk page
to push a POV rather than addressing the article in a constructive manner.
Please stop.' I AM NOT PUSHING A P.O.V. If you do not understand basic
English grammar, you have no business telling me that my point is a ""point of
view"". Grammar is not a matter of a ""point of view"". It is a technically
precise set of rules. Previously, you said you deleted my work for
""discussing the subject, and not improving the article"". I AM NOT DISCUSSING
THE ELIGIBILITY/CERTIFICATE/THEORY subject, I AM NOT EXPRESSSING A POINT OF
VIEW. I AM TALKING ABOUT IMPROVING THE ARTICLE BY CLARIFYING THAT ENTIRE ISSUE
IS A FRAUD ACCORDING TO THE RULES OF ENGLISH GRAMMAR AS ANY LITERATE PERSON
CAN SEE. AND I AM ALSO SAYING TO ADD THE CLAUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION THAT IS AT ISSUE. Stop abusing whatever authority you have, I am making factual statements concerning serious foundational elements that should be part of the article!
As I previously posted here: THE ARTICLE SHOULD BE IMPROVED by making it clear
in the opening statement that the entire issue is a fraud upon the public
since there is no ""natural born citizen"" requirement that is applicable today.
That is fundamental to an informative relevant foundation to the article, not
a matter of opinion, and a matter of grammatical fact. And if I am wrong, then someone that is more
of an expert than I can correct me.
If I say ""No animal except a mouse, or a rat, at the time I give the signal,
shall be captured"", then I am saying only mice and rats shall be captured AT
THE TIME I GIVE THE SIGNAL. My order has no validity at any other point in
time. Similarly, the requirement for ""natural born citizen"" only applied AT
THE TIME OF THE ADOPTION OF THIS CONSTITUTION. It does not apply today, and
the following clause should be part of the article, since it is the clause at
the foundation of the issue in the article:
No person except a natural born Citizen, or a
Citizen of the United States, at the time of the
Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible
to the Office of President; neither shall any
person be eligible to that Office who shall not
have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and
been fourteen Years a Resident within the United
States.
209.112.188.15
" | 0 |
Was that fast enough? | 0 |
If you look at the WHOIS information on the site, it appears to be registered by his agent, so yes, I'd say it's official. | 0 |
"::::: The malingering ""issue"" is a total noise signal. Every disorder in the world including diabetes, hypertension and cancer is affected by malingerers who feign illness for financial gain. There is nothing unique about malingering in FM per se, but to add it as content in this article only further adds to the stigmatization of the persons whose lives are destroyed by this disorder. Biologically speaking, catastrophizing is a much more pertinant issue because it has a demonstrable affect on brain function. What the last several days have demonstrated is that a self-righteous editor with an axe to grind can wreck havoc on an article by insisting on inserting some factoid that s/he ""iscovered"" that ""proves"" her point, which at a fundamental level introduces a gross amount of OPINION and EDITORIALIZING while masquereding as good faith editing. In the meantime, a great article is now in shambles. SHAME ON YOU!
" | 0 |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._state_foods
Can you edit this page to show that Jell-O is Utah's official state snack food? | 0 |
"
Request for guidance
In reference to your (IMHO slightly aserbic) comments to 12:59, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)" | 0 |
"==GA Review==
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Dan Povenmire/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
right, man wiered that this not a ga yet well, here are some comments:
text
every thing seems fine but the personal life it is a bit short and putting an image in a section so short dose not, help.
show me the age that he has many pepole are intrestedc in that i am a fan of that.
this is just a suggestion merge education with child hood(suggesting)
as in phineas and ferb i suggest you put a main over rockos mordern life and family guy.
to be true this artical looks FA potential, suggestion if planning to this man has worked for Family guy and is important to the group and disney as well so ask, feel free to review the family guy cast. the rookie " | 0 |
In an ideal world, one might ask Roth about that, and I can think of a few reasonable answers. In reality, it's just going to be fodder for the mob. Of course, primary sources can be wrong (though Bloomberg is a secondary source anyway). However, note this does not justify fetishizing secondary sources. Doctors can make mistakes, but they are far far better than quacks. The problem here is that scholarship tries to ask what's right, and the rules of Wikipedia ask what's widespread in the media, which can be very different (this point has been made above). Good scholarly practice is to weigh all sources carefully. Real Wikipedia practice is to edit-war relentlessly with the sources as tokens of status (ok, that's a slight joke, but only slightly). | 0 |
Lysy, I did not accuse you in anything. I simply pointed out to the existence of the trend with Catherine, Suvorov, Russo-Japanese war and even Tyutchev, Pushkin and Ded Moroz articles getting an excessive polonocentric view. I disagreed with that particular edit to the RA article because it is within that pattern, set not by you. The reason why that illustration was not optimal, is explained in detail at Talk:Russian architecture#Stalin's palace in Warsaw. Your attempt to illustrate the article was appreciated. The image later was replaced with the image that illustrated the article better and there is no need for more than one illustration of this particular issue in such a broad article, especially since we have several narrower ones. | 0 |
David Shulman edit
I've reverted your edit. Shulman's bilingualism and mastery of those languages is listed both in his curriculum, and in many articles, including that of T.S. Subramanian, cited on the page. Regards | 0 |
"
If I can put my tuppence in, I loathe info-boxes! (most info boxes). Take a look at the new(ish) info box for cathedrals which allows you to add the name of everyone down to the vintner, the baker, the candlestick maker.
In checking out the deleted box, I noticed that the building was described, in part, as ""Gothic Revival"" and the inserter claimed all the info came from the text. So I looked, and there it said that the three-storey school wing is Gothic Revival in style. I didn't delete this, but I don't think that it is a very good way to describe it. It is a very standard government building which nods slightly in the direction of the Gothic in the pitch of its roof and its projecting eaves. I wouldn't go so far as to describe it as architecturally ""Gothic Revival"" which conjours the expectation of something more. If it was in Australia it would be tagged ""Federation"". That covers a multitude.
" | 0 |
"
Spare me Java. After this comment by you on my talk in July, I cautioned you against mocking and misrepresenting people's religions, or jumping to conclusions based on your misconceptions of their beliefs. If what you wrote at the Template talk:Palestinian ethnicity was innocently satirical, I find it very hard to believe. Please stop with the bad-mouthing. It creates a bad atmosphere. " | 0 |
Dear Wikipedia elitists: don't delete my comments. I will continue to fight oppressive citation requests, like those this beleaguered user discusses. You cannot stop me, and you cannot ban me. Polluting this article with unnecessary citation tags is a joke and a violation of wikipedia guidelines. | 0 |
"
Temazepam article
He is starting the fight back up on the temazepam talk page. I can only hold my temper for so long as I see my reputation and character as an established editor further hammered into the ground by this person. Just letting you know. We were meant to be ""cooling it"" as requested but he won't let it go. " | 0 |
I've corrected the nesting. McGovern did run in 1984 and Trotta did cover it - I've added a reference for this. — (Talk Contribs) | 0 |
April 2009
Please stop adding the inappropriate links. You've been warned regarding this many times. | 0 |
"
Image:Peter macnicol.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Peter macnicol.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. " | 0 |
The article on Morphological analysis needs an overhaul
The article on Morphological analysis started out as a relatively simple reference to Zwicky’s ideas, a definition of the process, a few references and some external links. I did not initiate this, but whoever did referred to me and the Swedish Morphological Society. This was fine with me: I went in and added a few details which I though relevant to the subject, but more or less left things as they were.
Then, a Mr. I. Tjahyo Sarwono came along with some very complicated diagrams, rather poor English, misinterpretations and explicit errors (a parameter he mistakenly calls a value, and a value he calls a parameter). I am in despair over this, as I don’t want morphological analysis to get a bad name because of a sloppy Wikipedia article. I would like to go in and give the article a major overhaul – but I don’t know what the policy is about throwing out other contributors’ texts and diagrams. Can you give me some council on this?
Tom Ritchey The Swedish Morphological Society. (ritchey@swemorph.com] | 0 |
"Your POV needs actual Arabic sources that use the term ""Khalij-e-Arabi"" before the 20th century (when Arab nationalism did not exist in its current form). Or You need scholars with explicit sentences (not your intrepretation) that say: ""Bosworth,Sick,..etc. are wrong and the name was used by Arabs before the 20th century and it was not a product of Nationalism"". " | 0 |
"
What are we to make of Lewis' claim
that ""Geoffrey takes it from the second-century De Deo Socratis of Apuleius""?" | 0 |
I think it's lexical. 날짐승 is 날찜승 but 길잡이 is 길자비. ''''lee
But which is more regular? Or are they both'' about as regular as /ow/ is in English? (show, cow, mow, now, throw, plow, low, sow, stow, brow...) - | 0 |
"
I don't think that my statement was ""uncivil,"" but that is your opinion, which you are entitled to. Like most on-line conversations, words can be misconstrued when the recipient of those words can not hear the tone and inflection of which they are stated, or in this case, the intent with which they were written. You are wrong to think and assume that my sentiments are “uncivil.” I was merely trying to point out that this individual who is not, in fact, a resident of Garden City is not an authority of the village. I do not claim to know every minute detail of the history of Garden City, however, being a life-long resident, there is a certain level of familiarity that I have that this other individual does not, and could never have. Unlike those of us who do live here, how can he discredit the statements that residents make? Upholding copyright laws is one thing, but to question the validity of our villages traditions and folklore is something that must be chastised. Read the published books about Garden City, talk to our village historian, maybe even pay a visit to the Garden City Historical society if it is that important to comment on and edit this article. But until then, I would limit those corrections to basic grammatical errors and Wiki style. It would probably be a good idea not to edit any of the information without the proper background knowledge." | 0 |
SysIQ Page - Edits
Hasteur,
Thank you for reminders. The page have got some edits and the more will come soon. | 0 |
"
WTF is ""Extreme Power Metal?
The last I heard, this was a phrase that something Dragonforce came up with to give their music validation. Does the genre exist or not? If so, why is it not listed here, of all pages? I know practically nothing about the genre, but if it exists, I would have thought it would be here... " | 0 |
Dave is on my contact list on MySpace, so that's how I know he lives there! You know Jim, you sure are quick to judge people... Yap Yap Yappity Yap! | 0 |
Yes c-c-c-c I did make that personal attack on your user page. I appreciate you realise it was a joke. I think you overreacted by getting me blocked though:-) | 0 |
Yes I am. It will be presented in a calm rational fashion after tempers cool. It will prove among other things that he is not a member of the Inclusionist Taliban, nor has he been involved in any character-assassinating. Hope you find it interesting. - | 0 |
I have never seen a 'ben avelign' before. Where do these unknown to me people spring from. Dont they know that if they are going to be involving themself in someone else's business, they introduce themselves to that person first?? Pretty odd carry on. | 0 |
I would keep it at it's original spot. It should be spelled correctly - with the appropriate redirect of course. | 0 |
"===Notability===
Is this book notable? There is no mention of it's relation to the main King Arthur legend. Also, if it is a children's book, then why is the plot so long? Is it rather a chapter book and therefore not a children's book? And again if so why is it special? ~Rayvn " | 0 |
" 2006 (UTC)
then the ""name withdrawn by request"" is not only unencylcopedic but it's blatantly untrue - wikipedians didn't remove his name by request, it was never there in the first place. I was rather suprised to have seen this after Wikipedia's problem in germany: but now it makes sense (it's disinformation) 14:23, 28 February" | 0 |
Hi, thanks for your message, sorry you didn't understand the above, but you are of course free to take whatever steps you think are appropriate. | 0 |
In my kitchen
There is a kitchen knife which is particularly sharp. I'm going to ____________________________. Suffice to say you won't be doing that again. PLEASE FEEL FREE TO FILL IN THE BLANKS. 86.179.112.61 | 0 |
So why does Every single External Link have Margarito as a Mexican National. He still has his American passport but he also has Mexican citizenship. But is he known as an Mexican or a American. Check all the references to and all the External links to this Article, they almost all refer to Margarito as being Mexican. | 0 |
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. The wind or breeze | 0 |
":::Looie496: I understand your credentials allow you have a good understanding of what is being discussed, and are most likely a very good commentator on the state of public neuroscience research, however your opinion as to the progress made in the military industrial complex is obviously not as on point, and I certainly don't think your opinion, even if you were a published neuroscience researcher, qualifies you to ""dismiss"" the statements of a Lockheed Martin engineer regarding military science.
" | 0 |
The problem is that it offers direct retail sales it may or may not be non-profit, but it is a commercial site. Also, it requires registration to view its resources. If it were a truly extraordinary site, it might be OK even with these drawbacks, but it just doesn't look that valuable or unique to me. You might want to read through Wikipedia's External links policy. | Talk | 0 |
how hard do you think it is to characterize anime as television or movies? | 0 |
Army Special Operations Command
I thought that the Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) was a component command of the USSOC, but I don't see it listed on your chart. Am I mistaken? | 0 |
What the pork.
Why in the tunneling heck do people use this in cartoons? 67.174.105.246 | 0 |
No worries, difficult decision to make, I'll explain what I need you to do later, bit busy atm anyway. | 0 |
Space elevator
Erik, is your comment on Space elevator at Featured article candidates an objection? Has it been addressed? If it's an unresolved objection, the article needs to be moved to the correct section, while if it's not an objection or has been resolved, the article is qualified to be listed at FA. Thanks for any clarity, 00:45, 25 Mar 2004 (UTC) | 0 |
"
Or we could simply make it easy for the reader and include the information here... And before you start quoting Wiki-policies (not-game guide, etc), let's take a look at a random popular game I thought to look up: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_Effect
Examine the depth of detail it goes into. Substitute Force Powers for ""Tech Abilities"", and then compare those, weapons and character classes with what we've got on this article. A lot more detail and information than the six, give or take, available options I'm suggesting including. That article, may I point out, is rated B class. A notch above this one, so let's go by example, shall we? " | 0 |
Lineup
ClaimJumperPete: 33
ClaimJumperJack: 22
ClaimJumperBob: 50 | 0 |
Thanks for the welcome Ian! I'll be sure to reach out to you with any questions I have or help I'll need! | 0 |
"
It's from 1926 and the footnote on the page says the statement was provided by the CS Church Board. So we might use it to say that in 1926 the CS Church Board chose to characterize itself as a ""denomination"". But that's not worth saying in my view. talk|contribs| " | 0 |
"
""Blanking the posts of other users from talk pages other than your own, Wikipedia space, and other discussions, aside from removing internal spam, vandalism, etc., is generally considered vandalism. An obvious exception is moving posts to a proper place (e.g. protection requests to WP:RFPP). Removing personal attacks is often considered legitimate, and it is considered acceptable to archive an overly long talk page by creating an archive page and moving the text from the main talk page there. Note: The above rules do not apply to a user's own talk page. Editors are granted considerable latitude over editing their own userspace pages (including talk pages), and blanking one's own user talk page is specifically not prohibited. A policy of prohibiting users from removing warnings from their own talk pages was considered and rejected on the grounds that it would create more issues than it would solve.""
Read the rules regarding page blanking before you act. Capeche? 63.226.104.225 " | 0 |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:No_original_research/archive15#YouTube_art_as_primary_source | 0 |
"
The recent edit that you made to Nut also appeared to be unconstructive. That has been reverted as well. [[User talk:Sky Attacker| Sky Attacker'']] " | 0 |
Pop ups
Hello, Academic!
Can you pls help me? I´d like to work with pop ups. How can I have them inserted?
Thank you,
yes? | 0 |
I won't argue with that, and although its played on official occasions, we no longer play it when TV closes down ) I have some footage of the Queens Birthday parade and it is heard there a number of times. | 0 |
"
The definition of ""unit of alcohol""
What the hell is a ""unit""? Please supplement with the equivalent in milliliters and ounces." | 0 |
Carrie died?
It says that Carrie Lee Thornton Miller, Maggie's 107 year old sister, died on 5 Jan 2010. WHERE IS THE CITATION? 218.186.12.250 | 0 |
"
You are making up that figure. It does not occur in the article you cite too. And think how illogical you sound. ""33 million."" There cannot be more than defensive gun uses than total crimes, as a matter of logic. And this would mean that 99.99 percent of DGUs are unreported. Nowhere in that article does the number 33 million occur. You are lying through your teeth." | 0 |
Wikipedia Adventure symbolism interpretation
Possibly of interest (talk) | 0 |
That's what i thought but as a Celtic fan, and earlier reading on wikipedia that if Man Utd win then Celtic are out !! I just wanted another opinion. Regarding the 'Encyclopaedic value' mentioned below, i agree that for supporters that don't have a calculator and plenty of spare time to work out various Scenarios for results, it's helpful to know the possible implication of various possible results as long, as you say, it's only for the coming matchday and accurate.. | 0 |
"
Hello
i noticed you edited The Great Big Quiz recently - your edits have been reverted by ""Mel Etitis"" a user who I personally dislike very much as I have had the same problem with her over the past three months or so - she doesn't have a clue about The Great Big Quiz yet she is determined to wreck the page and keep it from becoming a bigger and better page. She just deletes every edit you do - no matter what. I've told a few other people about this, and hopefully with your help too we can convince this twit that we're right and they're wrong.
Just look at the page history!
Thanks" | 0 |
i cant adding the sources if you keep reverting everything | 0 |
Alright, so... every show on the list should have a source? Every single one? If so, then why do at least half of them not have sources? Also, I have submitted almost 200 titles to IMDb. They will not accept new additions unless you prove that the film/TV show/video game actually exists. | 0 |
The article Jessica Tang has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. | 0 |
Eelam War IV
Could you please see Eelam War IV.
Thanks. | 0 |
"
Oppose. Let's leave the correct spelling on the article, it is more accurate. As the English spelling without the umlaut redirects to the actual page, there is no reason to change it. 009 " | 0 |
"
4chan meme is posting pictures with crude captions. What edits of mine demonstrate this? — (talk • contribs) " | 0 |
"
Off topic material
I found the following at the end of the history section:
However for those who truly ""hold life cheap"", chemical and biological weapons are far more effective at leaving property/""capital"" undamaged and people dead, indeed although the US officially disbanded their BW program in 1972, the Soviet Union, despite also signing the Biological Weapons Convention in 1972, clandestinely continued the Soviet biological weapons program by reclassifying it as the civilian ""Biopreparat"", with offensive weaponization of pathogens continuing in that facility right up until the dissolution of the state in 1991.[30]
While I agree with the above, it comes across as a rebuttal that seems out of place and goes on too long about biological weapons. If a quote from a person instrumental in the development and discussion of such weapons can be found that says essentially the same thing that could be used in stead of the above. ~~~~" | 0 |
"
I did the caption and will put some time into adding the data in the link in the AM. Thanks Ellin. you really need to find something to do and please, log in or create an account as clearly your enthusiasm, experience with syntax and policy was not obtained with the few edit's you have made, under this Anon I.P. . . . talk→ " | 0 |
Hi, further to the above, I would hazard a guess that you, with the name Simsy86 are in fact Nick Sims, a player of the club (?) I would suggest that you read WP:COI and consider whether you are an appropriate person to write such an article. I say this with the caveat that I am not saying it is inappropriate for you to write such an aritcle and also that I accept you may not be Nick Sims! | 0 |
"
An AFD you participated in has been relisted
After a deletion review, a recently closed AFD has been relisted. I am contacting everyone who participated the first time who hasn't found their way there already. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flat Bastion Road (2nd nomination) " | 0 |
.
If you are remonstrating with my comments on a Articles for Deletion discussion, it would really help me if you could point out to me which provisions of WP:ORG, WP:CORP, WP:AUTHOR, WP:BIO, WP:BAND, WP:PROF or WP:ATHLETE (delete as appropriate) you feel is established by your article and why it should not be deleted. I am not a mad deletionist by nature, but we do need to abide by the guidelines. I am very happy to talk | 0 |
Is this article under construction? I did a vandalism rollback and when I was thorugh noticed that the second half of the article has virtually no refs, while the first half has many. It sure would be nice if every para had at least one ref. | 0 |
Dunno. Looks OK to me. What didn't you like? 21:38, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC) | 0 |
Cool, good to know 202.180.127.97 | 0 |
Cleanup
This article badly needs cleanup. I'm going to remove everything without some kind of link to another Wikipedia page as a start. | 0 |
YEAH! I think I can confedently say 95% of all straight men would go there in a second! | 0 |
Let's be honest here. You've blocked me because I am amongst the growing crowd who are questioning the motives of those amongst the Wikipedia staff and administration when it comes to blocking accurate, npov, thoroughly-sourced information in the Justin Berry article. Do you even know why, are you just playing lemming like the rest of them? | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.