text stringlengths 1 29.3k ⌀ | label float64 0 1 |
|---|---|
I do not think this is such a good idea. Dicklyon's POV is now staying for one whole week as the official page. If you really wanted to be fair as you say, then you should have brought the page to its original state before the dispute and then lock it. The way you did it, it just looks like you took one side and that is not even the article author's side (the guy whose effort was recognized by featuring the related article on WP main page). So I think this lock should be lifted. | 0 |
A tag has been placed on Intera Systems, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. | 0 |
explain, since you wont even agree, I wont even waste time on that | 0 |
Viriditas appears to be a bit confused about the difference between original research and a pertinent observation regarding some apparent vandalism of the main article. WP:OR does not require us to leave our brains at the door. 122.60.93.162 | 0 |
"
Reply
Your welcome. (talk) " | 0 |
Final Fantasy VIII Points
Can anybody explain why points aren't showing up in this section? That would be helpful; thanks in advance. P.S. Manually using the HTML codes and isn't doing anything either. | 0 |
" Hello 120.59.172.193, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks ("") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on ""text"". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. " | 0 |
"
Another section which is now called as Malis named as saini or , I think the claim is and the evidence is that Malis started identifying themselves as sainis. Some vested interests it seems have been trying to create confusion by using he lines ""Some people in that area identified themselves as Saini apparently due to their intermarriage with Malis."" and try to give the impresson that these people were called sainis because of their marriage to Malis. Whereas previuosly it had been mentioned that Malis started using Sainis later on and not the other way around. Again to me it seems malafide intention and against the wikipedia policies." | 0 |
The initial list was somewhere around 1.3 million, I think? But that was with very limited filtering. I'm about one-third of the way finished processing the list. | 0 |
No mystery there. Validly deleted articles that are recreated are speedy candidates. I have deleted it and will not play Tony's absurd game of thinking that VfD is the way to circumvent VfU. It is not. No more debate is necessary. If he recreates it, it should be speedy deleted until there is a consensus to undelete it. That would revoke the deletion determination, and only that. | 0 |
"
coal future
You added ""(At 5% growth per annum compound this means the resource runs out in year +45, 2051.) "" to the article. Do you realise how ridiculous it is ? That implies that in 45 years time we'll be using 9 times as much coal as we do now. Does that seem likely to you? " | 0 |
Fox
Stop posting this rubbish about Fox and Al Jazeera | 0 |
Is Deelishis gonna lose?
There is also a rummor that Deelishis may have lost. According to a comment she made on BET Black Carpent saying she was very single and that ir was a pleasure meeting Flavor Flav. check out http://www.vh1.com/interact/boards/main.jhtml/flavor_of_love_2/ViewThread?tID=1143203&mID;=5738093&offset;=0&index;=0 | 0 |
"
Title
Since it is more widely known as ""The Final Dimension"", shouldn't the article page by ""The Final Dimension"" with ""The Sorcerer"" being the ""aka"" portion? The posters, DVDs, and television spots all list the title as ""TFD"" and not ""TS"". " | 0 |
I'll atke a look. | 0 |
I understand, and no offense taken. I should of simply said I replied. ) | 0 |
The article shouldn't be moved again until we know the final, official title. When the article is moved, please fix any double redirects. - | 0 |
Well the man himself was not Greek. If you demand that the Greek spelling of his name be placed because his laws were issued in Greek, then the Albanian spelling of his name has an equal right - if not more - to be displayed since he was Illyrian. Thank you. | 0 |
Wikipedia is a repetition of the old joke that Hitler would get into a nightclub based on his shiny shoes, whereas Jesus would be rejected for his sandals. | 0 |
2005 (UTC)
No again. Reference frame discussions are germane to the biblical arguments. 08:02, 1 Apr | 0 |
Manuel Castells
Manuel Castells talks about networks at a social level, n this talk referring to understandings of powerin networks: Network Theories of Power - Manuel Castells | 0 |
Hi, back. I'll leave these bot messages because they are polite and assume good faith. Props to their creators. | 0 |
Hey there buddy, I am back:
Regarding your previous posts, here is some food for thought. In the Marine Corps, as a Gunny Sgt. or someone in command, if you are at a bar or a party, you never show that you are drunk. If you are drunk, you do not admit it... You're basically shooting yourself in the foot by admitting that you have had a few drinks while fiddling around on wikipedia, (and in some cases, 3 cases???) learn from that pal... | 0 |
"
Thanks for offering up the code Lightmouse, although I think you've already ""de-linked"" all the articles I work on already ;) And thanks for the de-linking Closedmouth. " | 0 |
"
If you want to keep anything these days, you have to find some mention of the character in Google news archive search. I searched for ""Avatar"" ""the last airbender"" and then the name of the character. If you look through that and find any details about the character, instead of just mentioning a name in a sentence or two, then you'll be able to save it. Otherwise, its a futile effort. Sorry. The Wikipedia has changed, the evil deletionists lunatics getting their way. You can find a wikia suited for it though. http://avatar.wikia.com/wiki/Avatar_Wiki More than two thousand articles there, dedicated to every character and aspect of the series. The wikia is constantly growing in popularity, over 30 million hits a month. Anything you are interested in, you can find a wikia for, or if not you can create a new one quite easily. ''' " | 0 |
I agree. I think his name is Heinrich. Not Henry. | 0 |
Laz, please do not put your garbage on my talk pages. Everything what was to be said is on those discussion pages. I think that should be quite enough. And again to repeat that those maps are good. If you have some valid and verified source which would show otherways they can be easily changed. But we went through all of this, and I'm not going to get into more circles with you. Your fraud stories take to someone else ) Isn't that simple enough? (razgovor)
Hey, do not delete what is posted. It is not garbage. You yourself admitted that your first map had mistakes, and then fixed it up by producing a second. Yet you keep the first one in wikipedia. How is that not a contradiction?! You then delete my post here, which I bring back now, and attack me. You're the guilty one here. I'll show you a source - compare the two or three versions that you have. They are very different. The least that you can do is delete the one that is more incorrect! ( ). | 0 |
"I agree and that's what I want to avoid. The current statement on the page howevever is ""the camp is currently lacking an assistant director following the dismissal of Toby Ayash in early 2008."" The camp doesn't have an assistant director and won't because the position no longer exists. As you can see from the camp newsletter (the pdf above) they broke the job into two positions. Also, she wasn't dismissed - her contract wasn't renewed. I don't want to create a battleground - just make sure the truth is out there. Thanks again. 72.94.183.160
" | 0 |
Anyone who'd like to discuss any aspect of the RfA process with me in either general or specific terms is welcome to email me. Otherwise, until my RfA is concluded I've been given the distinct impression that the less I speak of it here the better for everyone concerned. Thank you for your understanding. | 0 |
Now I know after all why U are resisting the changes in the article, u are a great 'socialist' isn't it? In Ur article on basavaraja devaru U have claimed because of his agitations government has taken over Udupi Krishna temple. This is far from the truth as usual u have no idea about it, so each of contributions is nonsense in one way or the other. | 0 |
Note For Top Gun and the reviewing admin, the discussions and specific copyvio accusations are at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive202#Block_evasion.2C_continuing_copyvio and most recently from . Et tu, Brute?
Note on the request: I’d trade the apologies for some indication of understanding of what’s wrong with copying from news agency reports and miscellaneous websites and a credible promise never to do it again. As for the mess that needs to be cleaned up, per the Wikipedia:Copyrights policy, material that infringes on others’ copyright must be removed. This includes material that has since been modified. See the mess now? —n | 0 |
"
Hebrew word
The Hebrew word עשנ (Ayin-Shin-Nun), means ""Smoke"", and adds up to 420 by Gematria.
Don't delete that. It's perfectly valid to the article." | 0 |
July 2007 (UTC)
Aaahhh ... the Wiki word of 'majick:' consensus. 'N then inspiring usages as: '... balanced discussions moving towards consensus.' With respect, KieferSkunk, you're indulging in some smoke with mirrors 'n handwaving. Since, whenever, has 'consensus' been some sort of guarantee of guidance towards ... what IS? (True/just ... etc. etc.) I'd bet that, on history's scale, 'consensus' is a miserable failure. The 'Triangle Trade' was a matter of 'community consensus' among those who participated, as was the Holocaust. But, anyway, that it is a comforting fiction of human understanding is neither here nor there. It's, well, what can I say, sooo subjective ... and thus by Wiki's own 'standards' unencyclopaedic. Grudging acceptance maybe ;-)
The idea of 'consensus' as being an aspect of 'mediocrity,' a kind of 'dumbing down' is featured in a recent R4 docu. on Wiki:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/factual/radio4choice.shtml
Download 'n it should play for ya.
I, too, have been away, and apologize for my delay in getting back. Be sure, that I will respond to your later contribution.
N.B. There are parallels in this argumentation between 'consensus' in Wiki and 'democracy' as it plays in the West. Particularly how the 'poor/weak' plebs are 'allowed' to manifest their reasoning in the face of the 'rich/strong' equestrians/aristos. 10:14, 30 | 0 |
"
Right from the title, this is not an article on Whitehead and his influences but on process theology and its influences. In the latter sense I reiterate that ""theology influenced by Hegel is process theology just as much as that influenced by Alfred North Whitehead."" See occurrences on Google Books: 3610 hits, a bit much more than ""a presumably scholarly source in the 2013"". You might learn something deeper by reading texts such as this one (601 pages, first original edition: 1970). " | 0 |
Stagecraft Assessment
Heya, so I'm working on adding assesments to the stagecraft banner and I've created a bunch of categories but they somehow aren't the same as the ones listed on the talk pages for items with the banner. I can't figure out why this is and I was just wondering if you could take a look and see as I'm stumped. Thanks a bunch! | 0 |
:Mahmoorganj
A tag has been placed on Mahmoorganj, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. | 0 |
Hi
Luke's Ass.
How you doin' ? | 0 |
"
""Disruptive"" behaviour
Bazonka, it's your right to place it, so please do excercise it, I have no hard feelings about it. I consider that it would be nice that someone else reads about my POV. As for disruptive behaviour, I might consider that it is you who is behaving disruptively by using irony as (I might consider) you had . Yes, I've been trying to act in good faith, whereas you stated that you knew that I had been acting. -) If you state that my recent actions have led you to what you state you did, why couldn't you be led to a point where you could act in somehow more constructive manner. Perhaps by discussing the issue on talk page, or some other way. You could choose. All the best, 's talk " | 0 |
"
I await in suspense then, hurry along - I believe some nitwit listed an IP in the confirmed socks of ""LaruaWA11""" | 0 |
REDIRECT Talk:Deh-e Borzu, Lorestan | 0 |
(last post tonight) Like I said earlier, the section on Tornado needs to be discussed on this talk page, and consensus gained on its wording as per example I gave above. You have references for the other 49 locos in the table, so add them to the table. One compromise is to have Tornado in a separate table of one locomotive underneath the table of the original 49 class members. Doing this would show that it is separate from the original locos, but closely related to them. I appreciate that all three of you have differing points of view, but you all need to try to see things from the other person's point instead of wearing the blinkers of your own POV. | 0 |
Typographic vandalism
Could you please ensure that you do not replace typographically correct quotation marks and apostrophes with dumb quotes? You have done that in at least two places: . Amongst other things, this indiscriminate replacement broke some of the links in the articles. Thank you. — | 0 |
Criticisms
That page has no substantiated claims and has unverifiable information which is forbidden to have on Wikipedia. No claims have ever been made about Starforce having to be removed via formatting the partition it is installed on because it can be removed via the official removal tool. | 0 |
Support - i think that's the right thing to say. Usually when the destinations list is as small as the Air Pacific one it stays in the same article - see Pacific Blue and Jetstar. | 0 |
See Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Is dismissing someone's views because of where they live a personal attack? | 0 |
Dispute on Andy Segal page
Mr McKandlish,
You disputed the information on Andy Segal page that I created. You have posted false information and if this behavior continues, you will be contacted regarding a slander suit. Please refrain from posting anything false until you are sure that it is true. All of the information posted in the article of concern has sources that can be documented. | 0 |
Tony, Happy to help. I'm a bit busy at the moment, but will get round to it in the next few days. | 0 |
Mountain View High School
It's definitely true and verifiable, but if you want to be a Wikipedia Nazi on a power trip, go right ahead. I have more important things to do in my life than fight you on this. | 0 |
You Lied about Me, Don't Do It Again
Jackmcbarn, I never did a thing to you but you lied about me and reported me for vandalism (). I am making a note of you. Do not lie about me again. I will signature this comment when I am able to do so without being reverted by people like you. | 0 |
Use as an emetic - anyone?
I found this article while searching for information on H202 as an emetic for veterinary use; it is often recommended as a first line for accidental poisonings in dogs. Perhaps this would be a useful addition? [ | 0 |
"
""Well you are not going to get a copy from me, are you???"" Why not? I have nothing personal against you; I don't hold grudges. If you are genuinely interested in making the information here correct – and that does appear to be your overriding motivation – then it is also in your best interests to help me and everyone else. I would like to see the source first-hand, rather than a citation of it on an external site, because, as we have already established, papers can easily be mis-cited. Like everyone else, I am happy for you to make constructive edits here, but your continued personal attacks (most recently, a wayward comparison with the hilarious, popular and universally successful Forrest Gump) are likely to preclude that, which is unfortunate. " | 0 |
"
Re
Your comment on Ed's talk page ""I want peaceful co-existence on the Wiki w/ TParis and you as well"" - that's pretty much what I want with most people. So I'm going to back off for awhile.v/r - P " | 0 |
, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
SHAN'T be bothering. Have just had my attention drawn to our very own Wiki which we shall be promoting in Cornwall as the more accurate one http://godhvos.wikia.com/wiki/Godhvos_Wiki 13:28 | 0 |
Tapir!
I am just writing to say thank you for your keen dedication to tapirs. They are fantastic. One day I hope to live among the tapirs and live their lifestyle. | 0 |
REDIRECT User talk:Flyer22 Reborn/Bennifer | 0 |
Childofmidnight. My work for Foxnews.com is not limited to the Fox Forum, I principally work for Foxnews.com, the hard news segment. Slate and ABC are two entirely different entities and are not to be compared. The difference is significant. | 0 |
List of Shania Twain music videos
List of Shania Twain music videos
Hi, as you know, we both have been editing articles related to Shania Twain. There's an article, List of Shania Twain music videos, which is nominated as a featured list. If you would like, you can support it at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates. All you have to do is put Support followed by your signature using ~~~~. Thanks! | 0 |
Genres
IMDb and Allmovie are by genre bibles. Jaws is not listed as horror nor Silance of lambs in neither imdb nor allmovie. | 0 |
Blocked from editing | 0 |
"
Finally you talking. You are saying plagiarism. You dont go around claiming that, as its copyright violation, so you MUST provide a source, more than just some pictures. But, alas, you still sound like just fan of Durham Red who enraged they look similar, and will not it go, and be mature. JUSTICE IS SERVED! " | 0 |
Profanity
Thank you for your edit to Profanity. The words you listed are already listed in the article. However, your contributions towards building an encyclopedia are welcome; please stay around and open an account. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. | 0 |
Indian Ghazal Singer, Composer, Music Director
Ghazal Singer | 0 |
New criticism, comments, | 0 |
On another note, I've fixed all the issues with regards to the GAN for Operation Windsor. Feel free to check back in. (Chat) | 0 |
Thanks for the conformation. I will keep an eye on Aciopruy to assure this kind of vandalism isn't repeated with other articles | 0 |
Broadcast
I've added a table for the international brodcast. Can some people help to add to it..? | 0 |
"
Huh. Now I see what Barnes meant, ""The .476 has caused much confusion"". ;D I think this will earn a DYK. If it does, it may owe it to you. Just one last request: page #s for the quotes? Thanks a bunch. [[User talk:Trekphiler|hit me ♠ ]] " | 0 |
Invite to Somerset wikiproject
Thanks for your comments on my talk page - you don't have to live in Somerset to join the wikiproject.— talk | 0 |
There. Now can one of us have the pages? We've done everything the proper way. | 0 |
If any other users happen to come across this discussion please note there is a discussion going on here to see if the Malcolm Bowden and David Rosevear (both speakers for the CSM) articles are going to be deleted or not:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malcolm Bowden | 0 |
REDIRECT Talk:Jordanian Democratic Popular Unity Party | 0 |
See the following:
Policy on neutral point of view
Guideline on spam
Guideline on external links
Guideline on conflict of interest
What Wikipedia is not
Please do not add links to genx10.com.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALinksearch⌖=*.genx10.com
Thanks!
(talk) | 0 |
/* Im gay and im Proud */
Listen every one i recently came out of the closet and came out as a homosexual and i have just told my parents this ....HOOORRAY BEER!!!!!!!!
The VaNdAl | 0 |
"{| class=""messagebox standard-talk"" style=""text-align:center;""
|-
| width=""48px"" |
|| This article was nominated for deletion on 4/6/2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus.
|}
" | 0 |
) To prevent this discussion going round and round again, please see the German Reich article. Despite how funny it may look, Reich actually is correct English for post-1918 Germany. Instead of simple translation (which would be nice), the evidence must be followed. - | 0 |
New CEO.
(Already put this on the Talk: Jagex page) http://forum.runescape.com/forums.ws | 0 |
Thank you, TFOW. In addition to that matter, I would also be grateful if you would look at the related matter of Talk:Omega_Point_(Tipler)#Disruptive_and_biased_editing_by_LuckyLouie. | 0 |
"
It's pretty old it was published back in 1987 could not find a very accurate updated version. — Babashi? antenna? " | 0 |
Dear Hydrogenlol,
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because your username indicates that the sole purpose of your account is to carry out disruptive editing to the hydrogen article, and possibly others. Such editing is not acceptable to our attempt to build an encyclopedia. Yours sincerely, (talk • contribs) | 0 |
Switzerland is Western European, not Central European!
LOL! John Calvin's society were all Western Europeans. How is Suisse distant from France? | 0 |
Upon further research I have found irrefutable proof that he got the nickname for the masterful way he cleaves beavers with his massive member. | 0 |
I had no idea what Black Friday was until I read this comment. It ''really' is only a US thing, heh. | 0 |
Alan Watt's 'Cutting Through The Matrix' =
What is a link to Alan Watt's 'Cutting Through The Matrix' books doing here?
First of all, those books are not meant to be free for download - the books are copyrighted by Alan Watt, and it really doesn't fly that he doesn't own the rights to his own books on account of a few photocopied scans he used from Glenn Kealey (who, BTW, is just out there).
Secondly, it has nothing to do with Alan Watts.
I think this needs to be removed. | 0 |
Likewise Hi. You do not want to, or are not able to understand the content of my message. The FIRST sentence in the lead section states WHO is the person and, if needed, what he/she is NOTABLE for. I therefore remove the word Little-known (which implies an unnecessary qualification, that can be added later, in the next sentence for instance) once more. You can develop Asselineau's lack of fame everywhere else but not in the first sentence. So, to take in account what you 'kindly' suggest and the word chosen by another user, I actually put it in a sentence that follows the first one (i.e. the second sentence of the page, although I really think it duplicates the last paragraph of the lead section and really think somebody else will mind as much as I do and remove the sentence, and the word for that matter) . I do not disagree with sources and have no opinion about Asselineau. Consider this my final reply to you, thank you. Should you disagree, ask for comments of other contributors on the English WP, about using the word Little-known in the FIRST sentence of a page.Aya (d) | 0 |
Bishops of Rome
Were the Avignon popes still formally Bishop of Rome? Were they also made Bishop of Avignon (if such a title existed)? Who filled the void in administering the Diocese of Rome during this period? | 0 |
"
Problem with the Fundamentals Discussion - This Was Already Erased Please Investigate
( minutes after posting this it was erased) check it out. this is very suspicious and unethical by the parties involved. senior management (if in existence) asked to investigate)
````Please do not block me for trying to improve the integrity of the article.
Hello, My name is JohnHistory. I was recently blocked for my mentioning of major problems here because I did not assume ""Good Faith"" when confronted with bad faith. I believe that the biggest problem with this article and thus the best way to improve it is to intensely follow the Jimbo guidelines to the T. I am going to post what I wrote on my talk page after being blocked during the controversy here. I could be more covert in my contempt for violations especially given my long but yet humble ranking amongst the Wiki Elite but abusing editors and monitors must be accountable or we will always suffer from their petty tyranny. This surely does not make me popular amongst them, yet I must assume ""good faith"" in them so that they will not prejudice their views against me and comfort their own politics in the process.
I was accused of supporting things I never did. All I ask is that criticism be included on par with other presidents. That is all. I don't especially care about Rev Wright, etc but if it is historical record and part of historically long campaign then I will stick my neck out for it.
I have to say that the amount of bashing of media and talk that has nothing to do with improving the article is highly tolerated if it is left leaning but anything even center of that is treated with heavy hand and often banished and erased. that is what struck me about the discussion page - mind you I never made an edit on the actual article I was banned for merely talking on a talk page. it was the idea that these so called monitors are in fact just random non scholars at home abusing the tools of wikipedia to further their almost personal agenda in a group- think environment.
Thin skin is no excuse for being literally fascistic in your approach to the open to the public - controlled by a small group of ideologues - Wikipedia. These political minding ideologues are 80-100% dominated by left wing or leaning people and controlled through even the excessive use of blocking for discussion posts and factual additions. These (not just mine) are non threatening non- offensive language - just the idea of one stating that their is a problem with the editors and monitors is cause to be blocked and potentially banned for not ""assuming good faith"" or ""positively contributing to the consensus"". what if the consensus is wrong then? What if about if you have already assumed Good Faith long ago and are simply diagnosing the major illness of the article as you see it? The evidence is more then abundant that these monitors are violating their tools and are involved in subterfuge or at least strong bias as evidenced between comparing Obama with W Bush. Additionally, the Obama Administration through proxies, in my strong opinion, is at work in the Obama article. I say this mainly because it is inconceivable to me that given the current administrations use and celebration of all things internet and aggressive pursuit of media outlets and shaping the publics opinion (as is understandable) that someone out of the thousands of Obama connected likely people is not involved on the Barack Obama page. It is the most visited page on Wikipedia and is one of the top hits for people searching the internet for the name Barack Obama. However, that is secondary to the already abundant supply of ideologue editors and monitors who seem to fill the demographic of the wikipedia junior officer ranks who enough of is all that it really takes. The number of those is in the millions. That is Why Jimbo guidelines must be followed as an example of the integrity of wikipedia as a REAL encyclopedia that could stand out in a scholarly work. The language given the Rulers of Wikipedia gives them broad ability to block and ban anyone they disagree with. OFten the language is contradictory. For instance I was blocked for my comments on the TALK page and cited for ""Making a point instead of wanting to edit"". How, exactly, do you make a TALK page based discussion about edits without making a point? Another monitor told me I had to assume good faith, yet no good faith was given to me in my quest to improve article. In addition, the ""TALK"" page says no writing will be allowed that involves ""general discussion"" however that can be loosely interpreted and it could for instance only be 5% of what you wrote and then be grounds by a prejudiced monitor to remove your entire sections containing many posts. Additionally, the last guideline about general talk is only applied to people making comments critical or potentially scandalous to the President o | 0 |
Oh no, you're not an annoyance. I was just planning on doing all of the German ships myself. I don't want to be too territorial, but I've been working on this for a very long time (actually, today is 3 years from my first edit to a German BB article), and would really prefer to do it all myself. Would you mind working on articles from other nations please? | 0 |
"
That might be useful. (Cranborne Chase in Dorset is another example which also states that it is an area of land given over to hunting). I will shortly be getting a copy of ""A Dictionary of Medieval Terms and Phrases"" (2007) by Christopher Coredon and Ann Williams isbn=184384138X), and this may well shed some light on the matter as well. (talk) " | 0 |
It is looking much better, now - good job, dab! | Talk | 0 |
Appreciate your comments. I will wait to post it. I wanted to create the page so people who were interested in learning more could so in one place.. I never thought promoting the page would be an option. I don't know how to contact Ryan for his comments however. All I would ask is if posting an image of his work could be done or is standard procedure. If so, I will work on gaining authorization for this. After I choose to upload the page, how long before its live? | 0 |
Your edit to the Dark Crusade section of the Dawn of War article
You changed the information to say that it was unknown whether the infiltration showcased by Tau Stealthsuits would be a universal change to all units in the game, or whether it was unique to the Stealthsuits. This is in fact incorrect, as the IGN article about the video in question pretty much states that it's a universal change, and I'm pretty sure one of the Relic employees confirmed this on the Relicnews forums. | 0 |
ipv6
mIRC doesn't natively supports ipv6 protocols. It could be enabled by adding a external DLL plugin who will enable a special protocol for DNS and connecting to ipv6 servers. | 0 |
Ok, i admit i have used sockpuppets in the past but i swear i will never use again. But please help me next time i need your help in an article because as you know there are many people that has bad intentions about the articles relating to Turks and if we dont modify them,wikipedia will look like a racist website. I dont mean you have to agree with me on that article but please take time to listen to me if i send you a message thats why i dont have to revert it. Thank you ( ) | 0 |
your rreverts are completely unethical illogical
iam not going to get afraid by your warnings.
i have sufficiently explained myself.
references are provided.
infact my contribution has been without reason has been reverted.
bewafai as edited by me contains all the info needed for description and ither users know very little about it -they have not provided all the info.
its you who is editing the artcile and reverting unnecessarily
you are a lier who keeps saying that iam making unexplained edits | 0 |
How do u put ur posts on ur home page at the same time? | 0 |
Nice to see I've gotten a response. t c | 0 |
Warning
Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. (talk) | 0 |
You don't to talk about what they've done ?''' | 0 |
"::::I disagree. A general genre shouldn't NEED a citation, because so many people agree with it. When have you seen a song by Slipknot that wasn't some type of metal (excluding ""Snuff"")? Perhaps you're taking this a little too far. There aren't going to be many dead-giveaway citations because they expect their readers to know that kind of stuff. Until we do find one, which may take a while, why don't we just leave it at Metal and from there just leave it alone?
" | 0 |
I can't really believe I'm seeing a group of people actually explicitly refusing to explain an obscure term in an article and fighting to keep the article in its baffling and deficient state. 190.44.133.67 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.