text stringlengths 1 29.3k ⌀ | label float64 0 1 |
|---|---|
Still a bit long, but thanks for your work and for taking my comments on board! | 0 |
Spidey
Please do not delete information from pages, as you did with Spider-man 3, it is considered vandalism and punishible by blocked editing privileges. If you wish to constructively edit, please do so in a respectful manner, and not by deleting half of a page. | 0 |
October 2007
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. [T@lk/Improve me] | 0 |
"
I found a reference for the definition of a topological pair. I think this is the correct term and that the page on ""pair of spaces"" should be merged into this one. The refence it gives is to Hatcher, but he only uses the phrase ""pair of spaces"" informally. He does not say anywhere that this is the definition of a pair of spaces. Hatcher does talk about CW pairs, and this might be worth added note. I do not know how to merge pages, so I'll leave that for others. -MCS, Feb 20, 2014." | 0 |
Disagree. It specifically goes to Young's point in the subsequent paragraph, and hence is highly relevant to the current controversy, and a point of contest between the two sides. The quotation is therefore both relevant and interesting, as well as being illustrative of Darby's point. btw, it occurs to me that we have no information about pro-circ organisations and their activities. The only one I know of is the Gilgal Society, and I don't know much about it. But in the interests of balance we should say something about these, if reliable (and non-pseudonomous) sources can be found. I thought you might have a better idea than me. | 0 |
adding a ref to the section title is not a good idea, instead use it at the end of a paragraph where the content of the paragraph is being cited to that source. βcommand | 0 |
. Reverting without discussion can be interpreted as edit warring, especially when it goes against consensus. | 0 |
The article Beau Slatter has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. | 0 |
"
's already responded on Talk:Valeriya Novodvorskaya, though I'll try to get some more comments. The warning wasn't for changing ""people"" to ""Bolshevik rebels"" per his interpretation of the encyclopediait was for deleting Mayer with frivolous justifications like this{[ndash}}which I took as genuine vandalism (note that the frivolous rationale for deleting here was ""let's cite actions, nor words, he actually did not do it""). Does that constitute vandalism? " | 0 |
somebody should add g unit south or cashville records because evidently somebody thinks there is a cashville records because they created the official website. | 0 |
Hello. I notice that you tagged my user_talk page. I have been reverting vandalism by another IP address in various political pages, because an individual continuously is reverting without even stating his/her own viewpoint or any evidence on the associated talk page. I would appreciate it if you would attempt to at least mediate a solution, or use your advanced wikipedia skills to place appropriate tags on the articles recognizing that there is controvery involved.
In some instances, I reverted outright libelous comments on pages such as Dave Batters, and they were restored by the vandal. | 0 |
Your undocumented updated are now removed. | 0 |
"
Industrial revolution
The section ""Within the Union"", contains the sentence citing England as being the birthplace of the industrial revolution. Yet as this sentence has been replicated exactly in the opening paragraph, and as it has absolutely nothing to do with the subject matter, appearing randomly and likely accidently, do I have the consensus of you all to get rid of it?" | 0 |
":Greetings, I like it the way it is now, except I think that Rosa Rein should be listed as born in Germany, with a German flag (and just add a footnote that where she was born is now in Poland). Theresia was born in Austria; the area was given to Italy in a punitive treaty after WWII. This is a bit different than the Venere case, where she was born ethnically Italian, even though northern Italy was then part of the Austro-Hungarian empire. In any case, I think it would be best to list the place of birth as it was then, and make a note about where it is now...
" | 0 |
I proved how you two knew each other before this article and how you started editing this article only 4 days apart; and you want me to take my accusation of tag-team editing back? | 0 |
"
And the pov pushers have left
Looks like the goal of the POV pushers has been achieved; they've kept the article locked to a highly POV version past the two-week ""news"" window through the use of belligerence and a sympathetic POV admin, and now they don't care anymore. " | 0 |
articles related to Tennessee Williams | 0 |
A tag has been placed on Amol Chawathe, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why Amol Chawathe is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Amol Chawathe. Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. t | 0 |
That is very big of you, and I appreciate it, and all is forgiven and forgotten. Thank you for being a stand-up guy. | 0 |
Regarding edits made during April 20 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make the edit(s) to which this warning refers. | 0 |
"::*Bobolus is not the author of the text. I am. This text was a commissioned translation that the client (presumably by Bobolus on behalf of the subject of the article) has indicated that does not wish to pay for on the basis of his or her belief that the final sentence ""He is married with five children"" suggested that the subject is married to five children. I propose that the line in the article be changed to the correct English ""married with five children"", and if the poster indeed refuses to pay for the translation, then I assert that this text is my intellectual property and therefore should be removed until an article without conflicts concerning intellectual property can be created.
" | 0 |
First I've heard of it. Thank you for bringing it to my attention. I remember nominating list articles... but I didn't realize it was that long ago. I probably wouldn't nominate any of those as they are now today, or even as they were then today. I tended to be more likely to !vote delete back then than I am now. So yeah, to be clear, it's not me. My guess is that someone is just copying the boilerplate phrasing I used back then without much more to it than that.
One other small possibility... there's always been some trouble related to cartoon articles and subtle factual errors. Namely date changes, which is something I've brought up a number of times in the past. If there's any reason for anyone in that area to have beef with me it could be that, but I doubt that's related though. Let me know if you notice anything else fishy. | 0 |
"
I will neither resort to insults nor put any words in the opponent's mouth like you just did. Instead, I will stick to the point. The matter of fact is, you cited regulations only partially, leaving out the regulation that warns about bias. It says (interpreted) that all authors and all sources are by definition biased, until filtered through neutrality checks and balances. So stop raising references alone to the pedestal of allmightiness. They alone are insufficient to establish that there is no bias (in them and otherwise). They must have an outside check. In historical science the check is called primary historical document and it supersedes all references ever written on history. In this case it is the Ottoman military records, used to create List_of_Ottoman_sieges_and_landings#Growth_.281453.E2.80.931683.29 and Eyalet#Eyalets_in_1609. Learn to distinguish primary and secondary historic sources. References in historical sciences are secondary sources and when they off-hand wild guesses such as ""Bosnia fell in xxxx"" they are called tertiary sources. Man, do I have to teach you the basics here? " | 0 |
"
Regarding References Cited
Thanks for the heads up. The reason I changed all those headings was because of the following message left after some of my work:
""This article includes a list of references, related reading or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. Please improve this article by introducing more precise citations where appropriate.""
This implies since I did not do in-line citations that the source material remains unclear and uncited, which is not true, though I understand Wikipedia's policy for standardization.
I do politely disagree that the word ""reference"" by itself implies internal citation. It does not. Many professional journals' ending sections say ""References Cited"", because ""References"" by itself could mean simply works used but not cited anywhere. That is, it is a ""referral"" to the actual work. Thus I did not see it as vandalism, but rather, as clarification.
Thanks for reminding me to sign my posts - I mean to, but I forget sometimes.
" | 0 |
Vandal https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Black_Kite - Welcome to Jimbo Wales to explain him your vandalism: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jimbo_Wales#Request_to_protect_Knowledge_instead_religious_obscurantism (right here). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/95.29.71.225 (your vandalism) 37.144.100.52 | 0 |
I reverted back to the 09:41, 24 December 2005 version where it is kept as a simple definition. I also made the definition a bit more accurate and added internal links. I still think somehting should be done about this page. | 0 |
I've done as you requested. | 0 |
"Hang on a minute, scobey. I'm Irish. I'd just like to confirm that Dáil Éireann is bursting at the seams to proclaim Ireland as part of this ""British Isles"" thingmebobs. At this very moment Irish politicians from Jackie Healy-Rae to Brian Cowen are on the verge of requesting that Ireland be allowed join the British Empire - oops, the British Commonwealth. We, the Irish people, are just absolutely gagging to be British. Feck Tom Barry, Dan Breen, Seán Tracy, Pádraig Mac Piarais, Michael Collins and the very, very many others who stood up against the largest empire in the world. We, the Irish people, are just on the verge of crawling on our knees to the English Crown and liberating ourselves by proclaiming all the dead Irish who died for our freedom as traitors and the British as our freedom fighters. We've withstood Humphrey Gilbert, Oliver Cromwell and the Black and Tans but now we are about to cave in - just now. Get a fucking grip, lads: get a fucking grip. Even for Brits, you are thick as two planks about who the Irish people are and what they feel towards the ""civilising"" British. No change there, then. Censor this, but it does not mean that these views stop to exist or that you British, by your primacy on this board, legitimise your own views by denying the Irish theirs. Ireland will be free, and the British will go back to Britain.
" | 0 |
"Also this User Walter Gorlitz is trying to persecute me due to his religious bigotry and intolerence of other viewpoints. He seems to have a vendetta against any ""non-Christians"" from contributing to Wiki. Please investigate and block HIM!!" | 0 |
My Talk Page
As per your edits on my Talk Page this is my Talk Page, thank you. The message in question was a perceived insult and I removed it because I don't wish to be insulted on my Talk Page. Thank you. | 0 |
]]
|[[User talk:Avraham/Archive 13|Archive 13 | 0 |
As for complaining to Jimbo, yes I feel it is appropriate to bypass a person who is abusing their power to silence someone. What seems to be happening here, by the way? Am I being prevented from participating in an ArbCom request I filed? Am I being prevented from adding edit diffs to better illustrate how the ArbCom case is necessary? PLEASE DEFINE FORUM SHOPPING. Your refusal to do so is another example of why ArbCom is appropriate. | 0 |
The article The eighth sea has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. | 0 |
Certainly relevant. | 0 |
Category:Hawaii mountains
has created Category:Hawaii mountains in order to populate Category: Mountains of the United States. I was wondering if you could take a look at it and make any suggestions, as it seems to be a duplicate of Category:Volcanoes of Hawaii. My suggestion is that we simply categorize Category: Volcanoes of Hawaii, which we keep as a subcat, and depopulate the article members of Category:Hawaii mountains. Wouldn't this avoid a lot of unnecessary duplication? Let me know what you think. | Talk | 0 |
That's not I try to say.. It was normal protests. | 0 |
"
, I absolutely agree. I was trying to say that there is a circumstance where it could be mentioned, but shouldn't be a ""sister concern"" section. AKA Konrad West TALK " | 0 |
|listas = Durra, Louis | 0 |
"
I think is unaware of the connotations of the word ""defame"", as I don't think English is his first language. He does use it a lot in connection with . I nearly posted him a message about WP:LIBEL as a kind of friendly warning, but didn't think it was my place to. I am not too happy about the collapsible thread either, PBS. I know we cannot have open edit-warring on the Talk page, but I was a bit uncomfortable with it for perhaps obvious reasons. ~ " | 0 |
Ratings
How would you rate this page? | 0 |
Yes, I'm aware of this. I told AMIB on jtrainor's talk page since i'm certain that the harassing admin is watching that page. | 0 |
"
Reminder
Please note that your group should add your topic to our list at Wikipedia:School_and_university_projects/User:Piotrus/Spring_2013#Group_projects. | reply here " | 0 |
"
Then you can report me at once; I will remove it. All the ""outside"" voices on the RS noticeboard supported it. And I´m cleaning up the 48-villaged, district by district; recently it has been the Haifa-villages: therefore now. You didn´t seriously think that I had given up us any of the articles on these villages, did you? " | 0 |
"
Personally, I am shocked that this sort of statement would ever be appropriate for a Wikipedia article Talk page and if ever there was an appropriate moment for it to be statement would be for the private grievance process that any organization of value would recognize and have previously established if a need have developed. Anyone that would feel comfortable dealing in this particular way I would hope would realize their misjudgment. This type od action poisons minds and unsettles people that are in a setting that is of a making not of their own. Now as for what you said: ""I notice you're not interested in the substance here. Your personal attacks are out of order."" Why on earth would anyone say such a conceited and probably self-serving statement especially when that seems to be in reply to someone cautioning you about what you say of others who replied to your reasoning of an issue and were not swayed. Not only that but that YOU felt compelled not to rest your argument for an issue on your own efforts but to bring in others to whom YOU showed their work and seemed more than happy to return an unfavorable review.
If I were charged with building support for an issue and wanted that effort thought on the reasons I presented then I certainly would not say that your work is no good because others have told me. What makes you think that what others not in the process of that deliberation trump the work of others? Was this brought on because someone was so forthcoming in an attempt to check your ulterior motives with the statement: ""Any nullification sourcing from you provides much more indication of what value it holds."" Especially when that same person says, ""I am not here to actively make enemies and disrupt others. All I can say is that I reiterate my statement and that to yours, ""Take on a world with no problems, you take on problems and stand alone.""
You are a trouble maker! And probably a sour sport. If any one is not interested in the efforts of Wikipedia is would appear just by your effort in this one section by itself. You can cry wolf only so many times before irritation precedes you. You just may have shown your true colors. Am I to encounter this type of motive in every article in Wikipedia or are your type in the single numbers and far and few between? Can anyone else speak to this. How should it be reported to the Amins at Wiki for at least review and potential resolution." | 0 |
That is why some of us are here and thanks to KansasBear, we can have a civil disucssion and ensure the quality of the article. | 0 |
25 centz
This was a non-notable band according to the criteria set out in WP:Music. Perhaps Myspace would be a better location for this information rather than an encylopedia, until the criteria are satisfied. (aeropagitica) | 0 |
I saw that removed your prod, I had reinserted, without any reason and without following the WP:PROD procedure. Do you want to AfD it? I will certainly support that. | 0 |
just for information you may include it or not but just general information about jatts belive it or not
1st jats are kshatryas as rajputs both have inter marriages.and majority of sources state them as kshatryas by only one unreliable source u cannot say them shudras.btw logically also u cant call jats shudras as they were farmers and farmers were called Vaishyas!.
2nd the relationship between jats and rajputs was like america and russia during cold war as both were almost equally powerful.
3rd in punajab region jats were only dominant people.
4th jats of rajasthan are not real jats.
5th u can compare jats to romans cause just like romans jats are brave courageous and only bravest of brave became kings like that only bravest of brave jatts became kings.
6th today jats are rich and high class people and are very prosperous.
7th every one aspires to be famous and become a actor,sportsman,etc,so its not a crime if a jat is a actor.a jat may be a actor but it dosent mean that his basic characteristics have changed they always remain close to their community and some are famous for their being jat only.( ) | 0 |
Then we will see where the discussion leads right? | 0 |
"
Can I just ask if someone has checked to make sure this image really appears in the source cited and that it is real data from a wide-ranging survey of some kind? I ask because I find it incredible that four groups were tested and found to have very different average IQ's, yet they all had the EXACT same frequency distribution of IQ relative to the mean. If that's what the data says, then I have no objections, but I just want to be sure we're not letting false information into the article under the assumption that it's legitimate. Soap—
" | 0 |
I'm surprised the French version articles aren't better. This happened in Quebec, and many students of the English language Dawson are themselves French Quebeckers. | 0 |
"::::For reasons I won't go into here I no longer have access to the kind of library I used to have, so gathering sources can be a problem at times. (It may seem ridiculous, but my original reason for becoming an editor was the appalling standard of English on many articles - I was actually only going to be ""tidying up"" until I could get my library back together). That is also why you may have noticed that I tend stay out of debates about RS and verifiability. In the near future I will have better access to sources, so for now I will tend to concentrate on issues of style and neutrality (avoiding ""myth"" where possible). That way, the lack of a library is a slight hindrance, rather than a handicap.
" | 0 |
"
This is what I have edited the Picardi article to.
John C. Picardi is the author of the plays The Sweepers, and Seven Rabbits on a Pole. His plays are published by Samuel French and have been produced off-Broadway at Urban Stages in Manhattan and across the United States. Sweepers received positive reviews in the Los Angeles Times. The LA Times (The Sweepers) Lawrence Van Gelder of the New York Times favorably reviewed both plays. Van Gelder said about Sweepers that ""Mr. Picardi's writing renders his characters timeless"". His review of Seven Rabbits on a Pole opened with ""An epic is in the making"".
References
" | 0 |
"
I inserted ""British Commonwealth"" into those sentences, about the North African campaign and the make-up of the Eighth Army! In fact, I have fought for quite a while to have ""British Commonwealth"" used in WW2 articles, when it is factually correct, rather than the technically incorrect ""British Empire"" or ""British and Commonwealth"". It's an ongoing battle. Use of ""British Commonwealth"" in infoboxes is justified in cases such as the British Pacific Fleet (active in 1945), Commonwealth Corps (invasion of Japan) and the 1st Commonwealth Division (in the Korean War), where units were specifically organised along those lines. However, in the Pacific between mid-1942 and early 1945, the UK representation was almost negligible (a couple of RAF squadrons and some army/naval special forces): the South West Pacific Area (command) under MacArthur, during 1942, was almost 100% Australian; New Zealand was the second string in Nimitz's command, the Pacific Ocean Areas (command) and; in the Aleutians campaign it was all US and Canadian forces. Use of British Commonwealth in such cases, or at the global level, conveys two false impressions: that the ""British"" were somehow involved at all times in all theatres and that the ""British Commonwealth"" was a primary military/political organisation, when the forces of a particular Dominion were very often alone in joint commands with the U.S. Therefore ""Allies"" and ""Allied"" make more sense and are more accurate than ""British Commonwealth"" or any of the anachronistic alternatives. | Talk " | 0 |
REDIRECT Talk:Iberian ship development, 1400–1600 | 0 |
REDIRECT Talk:Archbishop's Palace of Braga | 0 |
REDIRECT Talk:NOAAS Mount Mitchell (S 222) | 0 |
I only put in an image of the virus on the right since it had so much whitespace. | 0 |
Pretending not to understand plain English is only one of the trolling techniques they employee. I'm not sure if the repeated threats are trolling or just harrassment or both. - | 0 |
Vast majority of publications state that falsetto regards to males only. Is not it similar to this matter by any chance? Why do you even mention the female falsetto in the article if everyone say it is in male only, if Miller says it is nonsense to talk about it? Not trying to provoke. Trying to understand what makes you delete the info about vetricular folds falsetto, or unbreathy falsetto for the only reason it is sourced not as often as your flexed not fully closed vocal cords breathy one. | 0 |
The weapon's name is Gluon Gun; its creator names it so during the game, in the Lambda Core chapter. | 0 |
these pictures are very old and are of not jatts or they may be of low castes portraying as jatts! anybody who will see these pics will think that today also jats are like this wheras jatts are not at all like this they are tall and strong and fair not black!today with globolisation international stores and malls have opened up in punjab and nebroughing areas and with the world jatts also changed they wear western clothes ,have imported cars but they are still brave and posses other characteristics of jatts ,they spend their time in hunting,playing golf,collecting cars,etc.all the jatts have their houses in chandigarh most of the rich people are jatts and recently chandigarh was the city with highest per capita income in india! | 0 |
"
Thanks very much. I'm going to start processing the links etc for the completed checklists. We may not finish it all in time but at least we'll get some of it done. talk " | 0 |
"
By the way, Terrillja, where is your evidence of the French or American claims? You claimed that the Libyan source lacks evidence and that it's an unreliable source. But you have no evidence to prove coalition claims. We use links as information... whether one is true or not is not up to you to decide. Wikipedia is supposed to be nutral and show both sides reports. Everything is a ""report"" not a fact that can be proven beyond doubt. All we have to go on with the French claims is a link... all we have to go on with the Libyan shot down claim is a ""report"". So do tell me... whats the difference?? - AGSman61" | 0 |
Progression from the Bazooka?
If the LAW is a single use weapon, isn't this a disadvtage as compared to the original Bazooka (granted it does not leave a smoke trail and has no recoil)? I think there should be mention of the reasoning of this change in the article. | 0 |
" (C)(T)
After famil members died in the WWI outbreak, I had a dead family member pulled out of the family farm house window into a cart for the dead. What is interesting is there is no Mexico page, just a US one. Just shows how country biased english wikipedia is.
That's terrible. I wouldn't say it's a bias thing overtly so much as people write what they know. A lot of us are American. The American media is going nutsthis hasn't happened to us in 40 years. I'm sure if there was more readily available coverage in Mexican media and people with time/skill to work it over that it could be just as built out. (C)(T)
Ncmvocalist's questions
Hello Rootology. You've made a series of comments at the block review (for the block imposed on Ikip), and you later reversed Ikip's block. I would request that you answer my questions as promptly as possible.
Have you made any attempts to communicate with the blocking admin prior to your unblock? If so, how many minutes elapsed between your attempts to communicate with the blocking admin, and your unblock?
You have stated to AMIB: ""You as an admin have zero standing or authority to levy this block as one of the deepest ""deletionist"" partisans on this site, just as anyone deeply involved in the squadron would have zero standing or authority to undo it."" Can you please provide diffs to support this claim?
In saying to AMIB: ""You must undo this block and not do such a thing again, or you will not be long for your tools once the Arbitration Committee sees what you're about"", can you clarify what you meant?
You've stated to AMIB: ""You pretty much missed the goal as far right as you can on this one, for being involved."" Can you provide diffs for this claim?
Thanks.
Hi. Blocks and admin actions are never sacrosanct, unless they are from the Arbitration Committee as a body or cited as an OFFICE action. Any can be reversed once by any admin in good faith with justification. I provided my justifications here. For your specific questions:
We were talking in the ANI thread. That is classically regarded as sufficient, but I posted the diffs that he was going to pull for him. There's no canvassing for days before the block. Since blocks are preventative by policy and not punative, the block automatically has no standing. I re-opened the archived discussion, that Abd closed, so that my unblock can be reviewed and re-instated by any uninvolved admin if required.
This would take a long while to gather it all, but a long-standing user's leanings are hardly secret. I'm a BLP zealot most times; Ikip is an inclusionist; DGG is an inclusionist; JoshuaZ is an inclusionist; AMiB is a deletionist; Phil Sandifer is an inclusionist.
Admins have repeatedly been told by the AC (and policy) that they may not use tools in areas in which they are involved. My strongly-worded suggestion was so that another good admin doesn't fall down that hole.
See #3. Again, any demonstratably uninvolved admin can freely reverse my unblock, I waive all wheel warriness, etc.
AMIB has replied to my unblock, by the way, on that thread. (C)(T)
Okay; just to note that it was very appropriate of you to revert the closing and leave the thread open, for the reasons you've stated.
There are a couple of things I'd like to clarify for future incidents. If AMIB had participated in that particular deletion discussion, then using his tools would likely be inappropriate. Alternatively (as may be the case here), if AMIB had been involved in personal and direct conflict with Ikip, especially if it was recent, then his use of tools would not be appropriate. Such involvement can cloud judgement. However, mere general participation in other deletion debates/discussions is not necessarily enough for an admin to be considered ""involved"". Similarly, | 0 |
All the links have NS as one of the claimant, addition was previously discussed and agreed upon, we even waited for about one week for input from Ag77 about that topic, before that section was added in See also. | 0 |
REDIRECT Talk:Sulfide stress cracking | 0 |
404 translated *humor*
For the humor-inclined:
ibiblio.org's 404 page has a long list of translations, including non-human languages like Klingon and C. /(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) | 0 |
"I added the sections on ""Types of acquisition"". I thought that this allowed the DRR to be integrated. I suggest that there be a brief descriptions of the modes and then a separate article on each mode. The Computed Tomography article jumps into the technology of the hardware so quickly I really think the person seeking information will be lost. some basic physics and the basic acquisition modes can help.
" | 0 |
Ok, you are unblocked.
Please read WP:C. In general, we can't use anything that has been previously published unless it is very old. If you have any copyright questions ask me, or leave a note at Wikipedia_talk:Copyright_problems. Duk | 0 |
from other's people history | 0 |
Sock-Puppetry
For the second time, this time in netiquette you demand of others, I have formally accused you of sock-puppetry on behalf of the Bahai administration. | 0 |
"
Claiming I have a ""tenuous grip on reality"" is a rather harsh appraisal for the legitimate removal of several direct urls, to the Interior Distance Education of Alaska website, from the main body of the article suggesting they belong in the External Links section, and the description ""online company"" is a perfectly accurate one considering the company uses the same to describe itself. Having said that, the remainder of you comments seem to support my initial edit, yet this article has been reverted twice in order to remove them, how about you act rather than just talk? " | 0 |
Meowy's block is yet again an example of how every given rule can be transgressed and users have impunity by dishonestly reporting others when they gang up and edit war against that other user. Sandstein, will you be answering to Marshal? Or perhaps you can answer this. Thise are the number of times which Elsanaturk has reverted Meowy in that article. , , . Then two reverts by Brandmeister. , . Per wikipedia rules one can not just remove a tag (and this happened several times) without proper explanation. In articles talkpage there were 8 comments, 5 of them by Meowy (current blocked user) and none by both users who have ganged up to revert him. Meowy has justified the inclusion of the tag both in the talkpage and edit summaries. Just like the user above me, it fails to surprise me how you as an admin are able to ignore it on an account of a technicality. Frivolous, indeed. | 0 |
"And besides, I just responded in the same tone, look at edit summaries, ""Syriac Christians are not a group of people. Its like sayinng Hebrew Jews. Stop writing nonsense please"", ""The name of the article is not Syriac Christians. please be constructive"", ""Baz has always been a nestorian settlement. I'm not sure if you know what your doing anymore"", ""please learn to use the talk page before moving pages to controversal names"", etc. " | 0 |
" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.113.46.96 " | 0 |
Thanks for the new image, which clearly shows Shiva's dreads. Blond? (ugh!) But much better. | 0 |
who is going to block me
is it you who decides who gets blocked | 0 |
"==Dan Alex Sârbu==
Hi, you can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~~~~. I deleted your article because it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. (organizations and companies) (people) It is now Wikipedia policy that biographical articles about living people must have independent verifiable references, or they will be deleted.
The entire content of the article was: Dan Alex Sârbu is a Romanian rock musician and composer. There isn't even a claim of notability, let alone references for such a claim. I noticed that you linked to the Romanian article. This should done using [[ro:Dan Alex Sârbu]]
- talk to me? " | 0 |
"Well, here's this site to show it may not be ""Muslim propaganda"". Look for Nasareans and you'll see the quotes fresh from Josephus the Traitor.
" | 0 |
Do your job properly or I will report you to wiki 90.212.155.58 | 0 |
"
Between when I left the request and when you replied here you've made 6 edits to 3 articles, including 3 edits to The Real Housewives of Orange County. It does not matter that the table ""has been there the longest"". If it doesn't comply with our policies and guidelines it needs to be fixed, not left in a non-compliant format. I am clearly not the only one complaining about the table. Numerous editors have attempted to change this and similar tables at various articles and you've reverted them without explanation. That's edit-warring, which can result in you being blocked from editing. There's even a Request for Comment open at WT:TV. However, even if I was the only one complaining, that's irrelevant. It just happens that I noticed the lack of compliance. Removing bolding from the table is simply not enough; the table needs to fully comply, which means incorporating row and column scopes, plainrowheaders, and fixing capitalisation problems as a minimum. There are numerous errors in the table that should also be fixed. You're obvioulsy aware of the existence of errors as you have fixed some yourself. As for being ""easier to understand, easier to read, catches the eye better"", the two tables are almost visually identical, so those are not valid reasons. The only visual differences are the capitalisation and column width fixes and better compliance with MOS:COLOR. From an editorial standpoint, the compliant table is much easier to read and update. That's why a similarly formatted table was removed from American Idol and a note left on your page by another editor. (✉) " | 0 |
Tachfin You are an editor that manipulates the truth is a shame for Wikipedia that there are people like your writing as an editor, you are Moroccan and hate to Spain and Spanish culture, including Spanish language, because Spain supported the SADR to be a country free and independent, like it or not the Spanish language is the second administrative language of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic and always will be, Wikipedia is not the Bible and unfortunately people like you make more people suspicious of this source information. I pass all the links of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic in Spanish, if you want I can attach more media in Spanish Sahara, newspapers, magazines, NGO and various organizations ........ all in Arabic and Spanish Language.
External links
Official SADR pages
Sahara Press Service (SPS)
RASD TV
SADR National Radio
Sahara salud
Economic development ministry of the SADR | 0 |
Location of old Booth's Theatre
It was at 23rd Street and 6th Avenue, the SE corner not the site of the present Booth Theatre. | 0 |
how can a suburb be ghetto ? is that what you said how can it not look at south central LA and watts and compton all suburbs of LA thats a ghetto not all ghettos are from the inner city when people are getting shot and selling drugs in a suburb its ghetto. | 0 |
"
IMO the ones in this article aren't bad. But they are not related to the point I brought up. North8000 " | 0 |
(UTC)
The animated image in wrong in that stepper motors don't work that way. In a 2-phase stepper motor, there are just two electromagnets and the stepping sequence involves changing polarity. It is a nice image, but it is wrong. Having a wrong image is worse then having no image. The image is wrong, the description below the image is also wrong. The image should show the two coils opposite each other working together and changing polarity. Like at http://en.nanotec.com/steppermotor_animation.html 21:45, 13 May 2011 | 0 |
"
The 2009 White House criticism of Fox News
I love the fact that the section is titled ""THE"" 2009 Criticism of Fox News. As if there is anticipation of there being a section titles ""THE"" 2010 Critism of Fox News. That is so classic wikipedia. I have to hand to you guys, you really outdid yourselves this time. Bravo Bravo Bravo. As if thats not enough, lets create a whole article with the same title, 2009 White House criticism of Fox News and while we're at it, lets go ahead and create one for 2010 White House Criticism of Fox News right now, since we all know there will be one soon enough. Gosh, we only have two months left, lets not miss that boat. Heck, if we are really good, we can get it to WP:GA by Christmas. Whoopie, This is great, I love bashing Fox News. I can't wait until 2012, so we can bash whatever candidate attempts to run against the democrats.
For those of you with no funny bone, this was meant as sarcasm, but did I really have to say it, Um..........YA I guess I did. " | 0 |
, from an Adelaidean .
WP:MELB
Thankyou for your edit to Mount Dandenong, Victoria. You may be interested in joining the WikiProject Melbourne, an effort to expand and standardize the coverage of Melbourne on Wikipedia. Regards, . | 0 |
"Oh, and I removed ""numbering"" from ""numbering system"" in the layout article, because we didn't really touch upon numbering at all. Should we? That might be getting a little too detailed, and it really is hard to describe in words.
" | 0 |
Khao Phing Kan
Could you please clarify this edit . Thanks. | 0 |
"
Your submission at AfC DPS Barra was accepted
DPS Barra, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. .
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
-Let's talk! " | 0 |
Threats
Watch when you leave messages like these as these can be considered threats. | 0 |
Dallas Museum
Greetings. I first became known of you yesterday and went to the Dallas Museum to see your wonder works. My favorite is the Wheel 1996. I don't understand art works very much, nevertheless you are the man. My instructor Mr. Jason Reynaga says your the best. I am attending Wade College in downtown Dallas for studies in Fashion Design and remember if you are ever in the area you are always welcome!
Ricky | 0 |
My Tourettes
I have a very debilitating form of Tourettes that makes it virtually impossible for me to leave the house - due to the strong taboo attatched to one of my main verbal tic, which is to let out a shout of the n-word (particularly when I get anxious or stressed). Due to this being an extremely taboo racial slur I feel unable to risk causing the kind of offense that I would by going out, particularly when I could come across black people in daily life. Does anyone else have a particularly bad manifestation that makes a social life almost impossible? I read about a poor man whose tic was related to child-rape - even worse than my own, probably. The problem is that the more taboo a word or phrase is, and the earlier you pick it up, the more it feeds into the Tourettes. I hope there is one day a cure because my life is miserable. | 0 |
. We are different in the United States of America. We are NOT like other countries. WE WILL LIVE FREE OR DIE TRYING!. | 0 |
Stop. This is an important update to show her credibility. I think you have a bias in favor of Michelle Fields. I am sorry that you are a fanboi, but I am pretty sure she is not interest in anonymous internet fanbois from Houston. | 0 |
"
Speedy deletion of ""River bird studios""
A page you created, River bird studios, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how it is important or significant, and thus why it should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for companies in particular.
You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.
Thanks. (t-c) " | 0 |
[edit: neither lede nor body] | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.