text stringlengths 1 29.3k ⌀ | label float64 0 1 |
|---|---|
"
Woows: you're lying about my quote somehow ""creating"" your latest WP:DISRUPT... not what I'd call a ""responsible response"" either...
transgressing the boundaries eh? Shall we deconstruct, so to speak, the transformitive hermeneutics you've inserted into the lead of Causality:
""...There is also a significant body of literature on this subject in the sciences, including the influential work of Bohr who noted that causality was incompatible with the alteration of what is observed by the act of observation itself, certainly for descriptions at the atomic and sub-atomic level,[3] and possibly in other arenas as well.[4]""
WP:GAME Lying to readers may be easier, but see WP:Quote#General guidelines: ""Never quote a false statement without immediately saying the statement is false... There is no difference between quoting a falsehood without saying it's false and inserting falsehoods into articles."" Bohr typically refers to classical mechanics as causality, and he stipulates a fundamental necessity that ""observations"", (the results of scientific experiment), must be described in classical terms (the terms of complimentary pairs require different experimental arrangements). It's well know that his fundamentalist epistemology lacked merit, and although Bohr was under no pressure to demonstrate the merits of complimentarity, had it genuinely been a new means of scientific description, it could have been generalized to the other sciences... to which Bohr vaguely alluded, but never sufficiently elaborated.
It is, of course, you, who has failed to address the substance of my rejection; and it is you who has stepped up from petty lies and WP:IDHT to the ""use of rhetorical devices""... as you seem to have learnt from my edit summary: ""Are you still beating your wife? Why is that?""...
WP:CB I wouldn't want to insult the intelligence of your audience by explaining the absurd; but as you're attempting to exploit the opportunity: please be advised that cheep WP:BATTLEGROUND tactics will be met with extreme ambivalence: WP:RATSASS—Machine Elf 1735 " | 0 |
Revert of 24 April 2007
I reverted for several reasons. First, the text was taken directly from the reference that was added, without quotations. Second, the reference is really borderline on being a reputable source. Third, saying that the 1972 West Valley shutdown had anything to do with President Carter's 1977 decision seems like patent nonsense - if it's not, there should be better sources. Fourth, the obvious intent of GNEP is to do the reprocessing overseas - there's never been a ban on that that I'm aware of, only on reprocessing of civilian spent nuclear fuel inside the U.S. There may be valid points here: get a better source to back up the allegations made in this one. | 0 |
A statement
I have learned for myself that your beliefs are not true. 216.49.181.128 | 0 |
I didn't make a threat. I said I'm not going to block you. And you don't need to apologize to me; I was suggesting you apologize to the user whose edit you reverted, in the link I gave you above. That user asked me to block you. Since I'm not going to do that, because after talking it over I can see that your intentions are good, it wouldn't kill you to drop them a line to apologize for your mistake. It doesn't cost you anything. You'll gain a lot more respect for apologizing than you will for refusing to.
I've taken more time with you than any editor has since you've been on Wikipedia, and certainly more time than you took with any of the IP addresses whose contributions you reverted. But I do have other things to do (like blocking actual vandals) and I need you to understand that you can't just remove the contributions of others without a solid reason. I direct you once again to CheckUser. If you don't want to use it, and insist on reverting valid edits, your fate is in your hands. Talk | 0 |
Small amounts of iodine can be made through the reaction of solid sodium iodide, NaI, with concentrated sulphuric acid, H2SO4. The first stage is formation of HI, which is a gas, but under the reaction conditions some of the HI is oxidized by further H2SO4 to form iodine and sulphur dioxide.
NaI (s) + H2SO4 (l) HI (g) + NaHSO4 (s)
2HI (g) + H2SO4 (l) I2 (g) + SO2 (g) + 2H2O (l)
Buy Atommate card game
Pick element...
Switch to... actinium aluminium aluminum americium antimony argon arsenic astatine barium berkelium beryllium bismuth bohrium boron bromine cadmium caesium calcium californium carbon cerium cesium chlorine chromium cobalt copper curium darmstadtium dubnium dysprosium einsteinium erbium europium fermium fluorine francium gadolinium gallium germanium gold hafnium hassium helium holmium hydrogen indium iodine iridium iron krypton lanthanum lawrencium lead lithium lutetium magnesium manganese meitnerium mendelevium mercury molybdenum neodymium neon neptunium nickel niobium nitrogen nobelium osmium oxygen palladium phosphorus platinum plutonium polonium potassium praseodymium promethium protactinium radium radon rhenium rhodium roentgenium rubidium ruthenium rutherfordium samarium scandium seaborgium selenium silicon silver sodium strontium sulfur sulphur tantalum technetium tellurium terbium thallium thorium thulium tin titanium tungsten ununbium ununhexium ununquadium uranium vanadium xenon ytterbium yttrium zinc zirconium
Go adjacent...
Se
Br
Kr
Te I Xe
Po At Rn
compounds
Select formula from below:
Fluorides
IF
IF3
IF5
IF7
Chlorides
ICl
[ICl3]2
Bromides
IBr
Iodides
none listed
Hydrides
none listed | 0 |
I thought you were adding them. I'll revisit my edit. Sorry if I was incorrect. I agree with what you've said here. | 0 |
I think we overlapped
this ended up putting vandalism back in, rather than removing. Looks like we were working the same article at the same time. If it's an article that's on your watchlist, you may want to double-check that I got it right. — ~ (yes?) | 0 |
Move of Pincho
I can't understand why Pincho has been moved to Pintxo. Even though Basques are very proud of this tradition, there are no reasons to link it particularly to the Basque Country, and the word itself is obviously Spanish! | 0 |
"
Rashi picture
Although I think the picture is very nice, it is a copyright violation. The picture's supposed source states: ""No part of this web site may be reproduced in any form or by any means without written permission."" A proper (scholarly) source needs to be found, which gives the name of the artists who drew it and when the work was first created. " | 0 |
(edits by User:TimothyHorrigan) | 0 |
"
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. talk ♦ contribs
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings." | 0 |
"
Response about noone in particular
I do find it suspicious why it took an entire month for ""he who should not be mentioned"" to comment. Does this mean that after an entire month he decided for some reason to check my talk page again? And to read a thread that is in the middle of the page, not even at the bottom? What is his fascination with my talk page anyways, is it really that exciting? For someone who claimed at AN/I that he had ""more important things to do"" than keep an eye on me and my talk page he sure is spending alot of time interested in reading things on my talk page and responding to them. I cant understand why he would take the time to read my talk page, what is wrong with him? If he did the realworld equivalent of the stuff he does on Wikipedia he really would be arrested for stalking. I dont think what you called him was bad, its your opinion and in Wikipedia you can have an opinion- in my opinion he's a freak and I'd be scared to live next to the guy, he'd be the type to watch you through the bedroom window with binoculars and write down the license plates of anybody who came to visit you, and probably would steal your mail and read it then seal it back up and put it back in the mailbox! I am sorry he has bothered you, I havent heard from him since AN/I and figured he got scared away. Hopefully he keeps his mouth shut and doesnt bother you anymore, I'm sure he'll latch back onto me because I'm discussing it with you now and he'll bother me instead. I'm used to it by now and learned from the last AN/I that I have friends and supporters and there's nothing he can do to me because I havent done anything wrong, better that he bother me instead of bothering innocent editors who were just trying to help. " | 0 |
"
José Luis Gómez Pérez
Hey Matty, how are you?
Can you please delete the page above and its redirect (Joselu Almeria)? The guy isn't fully pro, and only played for Spanish third and fourth division sides.
Cheers, 77 ✉ " | 0 |
Changed the template
changed the template and added the new one includes his signature and his work.last template did not describe it memorials dedicated to him are in mohandas karamchand gandhi template. | 0 |
User OTHAFA
I see you have crossed swords with , suspecting (rightly) that he/she is a sock puppet of . You might be interested in another sock account , which was blocked yesterday. Perhaps there is a case for reporting the other two? | 0 |
To do the Chess Board
Hi, I'm the one that was conversing with J. Deloney and I just thought to show you how to accomplish this...
The codes (With J.D.'s name on it) is [here] but you can make a move almost anytime on my page here ;-)
To change to your name, just do a quick little personal search for any existance of her name, then switch it to hers. | 0 |
Flag
The kingdom of Sicily did not possess a Flag; It possessed numerous CoA's and Flags according to its respective rules; Because of the factual correctness: Flag deleted from info box | 0 |
"
I meant ""premature"" in the sense of ""before the onset of old age"". 44 is middle-aged, so he wasn't really old. But I have no objection to the removal of the word; it was redundant, after all. 20:39 Mar 2, 2003 (UTC)" | 0 |
It has yet to explain any of them. | 0 |
Yes, I know. That's what we're discussing. The official list apparently counts Benedict IX three times (for his three reigns) but skips Pope-Elect Stephen. I'm about to fix it | 0 |
.
Or learn from others at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ervin_L%C3%A1szl%C3%B3#cite_note-0 | 0 |
Here's an empty one: Template:User Australian English. What to do with it? talk | 0 |
Talk for unprotection, ect.
Well, not much vandalism going on compared to others, one month protection...! A bit excessive? Heh. anyway I thought I just bring up a few pointers. Here is one external link which is 3rd party citation. obsessedwithwrestling.com Profile. I am sure if you ask nicely on the WP:PW talk page, someone might help add citation. | 0 |
"
I'm sure we could all point to lots of articles that without our scrubbing wouldn't still have their stars, {{roy of the Rovers]] springs immediately to my mind. But it's not about who wrote what, as PoD says, it's about ""does the article meet the FA criteria""? Fatuorum " | 0 |
The Weir is a play written by Conor McPherson in 1997. It was first produced at The Royal Court Theatre Upstairs in London, England, on 4 July 1997. It first appeared on Broadway at the Walter Kerr Theatre on 1 April 1999. It has since been performed in Toronto, Dublin, Belfast, Boston, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Los Angeles, Chicago, Buffalo, Washington, D.C. and San Jose.[1] | 0 |
"
I can't seem to make Wikipedia email work, so I'll respond here. You asked ""how [did I] come to create Mike Hawash ... and why ... come back to it a year later"" not sure how to answer that - I must have either followed a red link or created it in response to some news item I saw. I came back to it later and added what appeared to be mostly uncontroversial information, until I was attacked I think the edit logs will show this. You also ask how I ""can edit from IP addresses all over the world"". Again, I do travel for my work now, but I have no knowledge of how the dial-up system I use (iPass) chooses where it logs into.
I don't see how any of this is relevant. Other than using a dynamic IP address, I don't see what I have done to deserve this treatment. P.s. - I noticed on Wikipedia Signpost that a case involving someone with dozens of sockpuppets just received probation how do you justify pre-emptory banning in this case? " | 0 |
Hi, please read WP:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_mirror_or_a_repository_of_links.2C_images.2C_or_media_files. Thanks, 1 | 0 |
02:28, 12 June 2014 User:Mvdc1980
I really don't think this has much to do with historic Gnosticism... | 0 |
However i think you are in no position to tell him what to do or not do ... ! | 0 |
Disaster for all social constructs!!!
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/319/5866/1100
Damn, and I thought that nation was a social construct! What will I do now?! My world is collapsing!!! | 0 |
I
Can't thank you enough...The flower is beautiful. The page is dull that way, but the flower brightens it. I hope you lead a great life ahead, good people like you deserve it. You're a very nice person. Nobody I know has ever been so concerned and kind. Please accept the barnstar as a token of appreciation. I know this isn't the time to go and award barnstars but you need it. Thanks once again also for the hopeful messages. I feel much better than before. As for the deceased persons list thing, I couldn't possibly add anything, i'd just be writing a book about her as a friend and a person not as a wikipedian. Since she knew | 0 |
Fair Use Rationale for image (Image:MWS1Book Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:MWS1Book Cover.jpgI noticed that no Fair use rationale was on your image's page. I checked for a rationale and still no rationale. Did you actually read the page CAREFULLY and look for the templete? Please go to your image and click on Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline for more information. Again, thanks for uploading Image:MWS1Book Cover.jpg. | 0 |
"
Kvens are indigenous to today's Northern Norway
Thank you kindly, user !
The user may not understand that the Kvens are indigenous to Northern Norway, in my view anyway, and many of the best experts seem to agree. We are not moved by the personal assumptions and/or believes of the user , but science instead, of course, as you seem to agree.
The user Please read the related writings from this column's archive. The Norse are not indigenous to the extreme Northern Norway of today. The Kvens are. The Northern Norway's Tromsa area alone has at least 12 prehistoric Kven place names.
Historians and linguistics experts have been able to come to this conclusion, for instance based on the words and spellings that were used prior to the time - and/or during the time - when the first Norwegian/Norse immigration to Iceland took place. The relevant sources have been given in this forum, for instance KVENLAND / KAINUUNMAA, 1986, by the Professor Emeritus Kyösti Julku.
Where are your sources for counter claims, user ? Do we only have your personal narrow view point, which even appears to be based on no sources at all. If there are sources behind your views, what are they in relation to this matter for instance ?
The related and quoted experts - earlier mentioned in this forum - are not basing their views only on the writings of Ottar, or Alfred the Great, or Tacitus, or any other before mentioned or not mentioned historian, or other scientist, writer or leader alone, of course. Ask yourself for instance, who might be behind the prehistoric jewelry hidings that have been discovered only recently from Inari, not that far from the coastline of the Arctic Ocean.
Examine and read more. Only after having done that, make your own conclusions, not before, please. In the meanwhile, let the experts make their conclusions, based on all the material and sources they have available. Wikipedia is here to reveal the findings of science, not the opinions of yours.
It is generally accepted that the Sami people are the indiegenous poeple of Northern Norway. I am aware of the history of this article. If you read the article you will notice footnotes such as this: A reference. These are the references for the paragraph you are reeading. When you click on one you will get the reference list. A link is provided for most articles. I suggest you read the article being referenced, and either start discussing my interepretation of the refered article, or the content of the refered article. For the later you need to provide your own references.
User Labongo:
Your view is not a ""generally accepted"" view at all, but only your view.
We hope you agree, that it is not reasonable to request for us to have to provide evidence to everyone separately. Please check the archive for the beginners.
There is a reason why we are asking for the exact quotes and exact - easily verifiable (as Mr. Mikkalai put it) - book and page information from you. The reason is, that simply showing a list of authors and books proves nothing. Wikipedia's vandals and foul players are known to resort to exactly this sort of tactics.
Once again: The sources offered do not agree with the text written in the Kven article ! To understand this, you only have to read the last comments by the user Drieakko''. As everyone can see, he continues backing up from his statements. In different ways, he goes on appologizing, while he attempts to round of his false statements. What does that prove: This is only a learning processs to him. He really doesn't have anything to contribute to this topic, except for chaos !
User Labongo/Drieakko: It is your job to show where exactly someone - a respected and known historian or other scientist - agrees with your text. The burden of proof is in your hands to show evidence. Please, include exact quote(s) and page information. That is how Mr. Mikkalai wanted to proceed, after a recent concensus was reached.
We are quite familiar with the related material in question. We have provided our sources in detail, you have not, not even a single quote with a matching book and page information. - - Steve Wondering
Please stop pretending that this article has no references. Show, what reference matches the current text - show even a single such source to begin with. What | 0 |
Jersyko
your like the pot calling the kettle black | 0 |
|caption= The World Trade Center's Twin Towers | 0 |
"
I prefer chazaq uvarukh. Please don't say ""koyekh"" around me...my present sinus infection makes my head hurt bad enough. -/ TALK 05:45, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)" | 0 |
General Catalogue of Old Authors gives her name as Frederica Jane Turle: the (E) is a code for England (cp (CA) for California). | 0 |
"
Hmm... that would be pretty nice, but other than checking back yourself (manually or with a bot), I'm not sure if there's any perfect solution. Only other idea I have is if you fiddle around with Special:ExpandTemplates to see if you can bypass some of those meta-templates. A bit outside of my usual experience, either way. ;) – " | 0 |
Khanum
So... How about a interwiki link for wiktionary page from Khanum? This is the link: http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%D8%AE%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%85#Ottoman_Turkish
It will be just a wikilink. No changes in the phrase... I didn't make that wiktionary link. I found it. | 0 |
in the words of google: dont be evil and tell your italian friend the same -) | 0 |
"
Yes, that is What I have said (Pray) " | 0 |
Japanese article / Merging two articles
The Japanese version of this article talks about both Golden Sun titles, instead of just the first title of the series. Shouldn't both English articles about both titles be merged together? I believe this will help raise the priority. Also, why not send a translator to find information in the Japanese article that the English one lacks? | 0 |
Gah! Scary unicorn! I can quite assure you that I will never (NEVER!!!) write my own Wikipedia article: main reason being that I will never be notable enough for one. At least not if I can help it. | 0 |
I don't know, I just moved a really confusing part elsewhere. | 0 |
WP:GUNS importance assessment
As you surmised, the ten percent standard is intended to be interpreted as an order of magnitude, rather than a difference between a disqualified 9 percent and a qualified 11 percent. I am certainly open to alternative suggestions to clarify the criterion; but I disagree about the absence of sources to define an order of magnitude quantification.
The American gun culture includes a large number of writers who emphasize opinions rather than pursuing statistics. As the internet allows anyone to screen for information sources confirming an existing bias, such authors may be well represented by conventional search-engine algorithms. I personally enjoyed articles by Elmer Keith and Jack O'Connor relating divergent first-hand experiences hunting with light or heavy bullets; but I sought out articles by Julian Hatcher to find results of side-by-side scientific method comparisons.
I believe sources are available to quantify the features qualifying as top importance articles. It may be difficult to find quantification in the popular press (including the anti-gun press); but well-researched sources are worth the effort required to find them.
Assessment of importance requires a fundamental understanding of the subject; and the amount of time required will vary inversely with the experience of the editor. I wouldn't encourage you to undertake this assessment task with an unrealistic impression of the knowledge or time required. As a practical matter, however, you may understand the subject well enough to know the answer after reading the article. If you think the subject represented more than ten percent of the firearms or ammunition, it's probably a top importance article; but it's probably not top importance if you have doubts. I doubt your decisions on that basis will be challenged; but it shouldn't be an unreasonable task to find documentation on the few which might be. | 0 |
"
AFC Creation
Please take a look at the articles created that were deleted. Some of the sources I had previously used were not what they consider to be reliable sources. After the non reliable sources were mentioned to me, I stopped using them. I started to only use sources that appeared on google news or on google books. I have even gone to the reliable sources noticeboard to see if sources were good to use. The SPI wasn't frivolous as a number of editors were previously investigated as being members of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Papaursa/Archive Other admins (. St★lwart111) have stated that there were problems in WP:TAGTEAM . specifically Most of my articles are about individuals who were are notable via wiki standards such as African Americans sports players during segregation James “Pappy” Ricks, Olympians such as Thomas Martin (judoka) or National Champions such as Howard Fish.
With 140 articles about 9 have been deleted. This isn't a horrible percentage. This is under 10%. Considering that most of the individuals who were deleted were African American Judo fighters, I pointed out that statistic, to which they claimed I claimed I said they were racist or bigoted. I never stated anyone was a racist or a bigot. I pointed out a statistic. After this issue was closed, one user tried to revive the issue, to which an admin stated "". Systemic bias is a recognized issue on Wikipedia"" Some of the deleted articles, I am waiting for more sources to appear such as Al Gotay, which was speedily deleted even I replied to a prod, another user wrote another message stating it should be deleted (it never even made it to AFD).
I have previously used Articles for Creation , but the backlog is so big that it is frustrating to use. I did say, I create so others can work. Meaning we all have skills that can be used on wikipedia. To me an article is like building a car on a production line. I put in the headlights, others put on the wheels, others put on the seats, etc. I don't own any articles I create. I rarely revert edits. I find topics of individuals whom I believe are noteworthy and create them. I look at some guidelines like [WP:WPBB/N]] and create articles from there (such as Negro League Baseball players or WP:NHOOPS such as players in the New York Rens You did notice some of the bullying , and there is a lot the , such as I put in bogus claims , but I put in a simple explanation and
find additional sources . I have improved in my article creation and firmly believe that if you put me on a creation ban, I will simply retire from wikipedia out of sheer frustration. I am not disruputing wikipedia actively or passively, I am creating articles that for most people are notable and according to wiki standards are notable. " | 0 |
there is no bias against Spain and Italy. Why would there be any??? Regards | 0 |
MDP lives in Charlotte and does not work in Clemson
sippin | 0 |
WWF Smackdown: Just Bring It
Just Bring It is mainly remembered for it's terribly subpar commentary and PSOne graphics, despite it being the first PS2 Smackdown game. Everyone I talk to knows that this is one pitiful wrestling game. Check out the reviews on Gamefaqs and other sites. Reviews of current Smackdown games also point to this one as the series' biggest flop. | 0 |
TODAYS WIKI WORD OF THE DAY IS NIPPLENOOB! | 0 |
"
Timeline February 8, 2005: Essjay account registered.
2005–2006: Essjay states on his Wikipedia user page that he teaches graduate theology, with doctorates in Theology and Canon Law. A public viewable version of this claim as dated 2006 is visible on the Internet Archive . (Please note that if you click on the above link and you have an IRC client installed on your computer, either your client will open, or, if you already have your IRC client open, new tabs/channels will be opened.)
July 31, 2006: The New Yorker publishes an article on Wikipedia, written by Stacy Schiff, which features an interview with Essjay.
January 2007: Essjay is hired by Wikia.
January 7, 2007: Essjay posts autobiographical details on his user page at Wikia, giving his supposed real name (Ryan Jordan), age, and previous employment history from age 19, and his positions within various Wikimedia Foundation projects. These details differ sharply from previous assertions on Essjay's Wikipedia user page about his academic and professional credentials.
January 2007: Daniel Brandt contacts the author of the article about discrepancies in Jordan's biography.Ian King,
February 2, 2007: Another Wikipedia editor challenges Essjay on his talk page about the discrepancy and he responds with an explanation.
February 23, 2007: Jimmy Wales announces the appointment of Essjay to Wikipedia's Arbitration Committee (ArbCom). Wales later asserts that the appointment was ""at the request of and unanimous support of"" ArbCom.
February 26, 2007: The New Yorker publishes the correction for its July 31 issue, which appears in its The Mail section of its print version. It is picked up by online sources within the next day.
March 3, 2007: Wales asks Jordan to resign his ""positions of trust"". Jordan promptly retires from Wikipedia altogether and later resigns from his position at Wikia.
March 5, 2007: Story covered by the The New York Times.
March 6, 2007: Jordan's hometown newspaper publishes an article casting doubts about his January 2007 claims on his Wikia userpage that he had worked for the United States Trustee Program and had been a Kentucky paralegal.Wolfson, Andrew. ""Wikipedia editor who posed as professor is Ky. dropout"", The Courier-Journal, March 6, 2007
March 7, 2007: Story covered in an Associated Press article.
March 8, 2007: Story appears in two-minute segment on World News with Charles Gibson.
March 12, 2007: The New Yorker publishes a formal apology by Wales in its March 19 The Mail section..
The Essjay controversy related to a prominent Wikipedia administrator and salaried Wikia employee, Essjay (later s | 0 |
Cloudcuckooland, unlike the myriad Pokemon articles for example, is often made mention of outside the context of Aristophenes, making it exactly the sort of thing that someone completely unfamiliar with the term would want to look up. For that reason alone I think stand out articles are beneficial. It's obviously not too important, as long as it's covered sufficiently here with a redirect, but it's own article could be more in-depth, if necessary. Also, the fact that someone made a link of its mention in this article (which redirects back to this page) makes me think I'm not alone. Do you oppose this? Or think it's unnecessary? I admit it's not essential. - 21:20, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC) | 0 |
I loathe ANI and avoid it all costs, only coming here [AN] if I find it necessary, and even then I feel like my time is wasted. I cannot ever remember leaving a thread in which something productive came of it. Most often, if I have a problem and I come here, it's likely I'll be blamed for whatever problem I have by editors who have no idea what they're talking about. Very serious problems get sidetracked by pointless banter, engaged by chronic posters whose time is spent primarily here. It frustrates people who come here looking for help. | 0 |
WP:ANI notice
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Disruptive editing-ownership-edit warring issues at Vinny Faherty.The discussion is about the topic Vinny Faherty. Thank you. — | 0 |
Writing credit
On some recordings the song is credited to Mason; on others to Waters/Mason. Can anyone clear this up? | 0 |
The Rollingstone is a better source than the Portuguese-Canadian National CongressPortuguese-Canadian National Congress one of the references you erased from her biography? What a revelation. The GuardianNelly Furtado, Loose
is also a bad source for you to have erase it? Maybe you prefer The Times: .
I did not call you a xenophobic, read it again. I made reference to your reasons which is something very different. Who cares what is your nationality, this is not about you. Every time you try to diminish that she is Portuguese with your silly arguments you are just diminishing yourself. | 0 |
"
List of Everybody Hates Chris Episodes
Hello,
I have to say I was not pleased with your changes on ""List of Everybody Hates Chris episodes"". You changed the amount of episodes per season, which is 22 all four seasons. Also, the dates were in the future, which has not happened yet. And finally the colors are not what they look on the regular page. (Season 1-Green, Season 2-Blue, Season 3-Red, Season 4-Orange) I dont know what kind of scam you are trying to run, but unless you have something to back up your changes on the page, I would be happy to listen, otherwise keep things realistic and real.
I have changed everything back
You can leave me a message, Ethanborden
Thanks" | 0 |
Thank you
Thank you for helping in Mother India. The comments in fac were incredibly good. (talk) | 0 |
Iamge sizes
The image sizes on this article are (still) a mess; portrait-format images should be marked up with |upright, per the MOS. (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits | 0 |
"
Unprotect please
Hello Steve, It's been awhile. Anyway, can you please unprotect my userpage. Chances are that I will come back and stay back so I would like to have my userpage open for me to edit. I'll try to watch my anger this time. I don't know what I was thinking then! -7
PS-Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year." | 0 |
Block
Boy, there sure dont block a fella for a long time! 18:15, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC) | 0 |
Turk's head brush article dispute is on alert in wikipedia admin noticeboard
Just to inform you:
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents | 0 |
IGN Rankings overused
Are these rankings really so authoritative? Why are they creeping into every article on popular culture? I suspect henchmen of Murdoch at work. | 0 |
The cited reference says: NBC News quotes sources as claiming that whoever turned the plane around programmed the FMS. Have these sources been reported anywhere else? Regards, | 0 |
"
Thanks for the update, Tony. Your tips on usage will me most welcome. Regards, (Talk) " | 0 |
This is about the arundhati roy article
i think the article has a one sided approach towards arundhati,not a neutral one.i think i added the wrong template.anyways you can make some constructive edits including criticism of roy. | 0 |
** • usually, ANI gave people a chance to respond to the accusation which I would have done within the next few minutes. To do so without a response, smacks of arbirtrariness. But I don't care. I have other hobbies. | 0 |
Thank you for experimenting with the page Portal:Current events on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. | 0 |
You said there criticism is not represented. Did you see Do not buy Russian goods!#Criticism? Did you see that paragraph is confirmed by references? User:Tohaomg 11:58, Monday November 24, 2014 (UTC) | 0 |
Thanks for the support, folks. | 0 |
Hello, we propose you to close deletion discussion about dwm, wmii, evilwm and qvwm due to obvious evidence for keeping these articles and giant quantity of proof links that are acceptable, as others wikipedians mentioned. | 0 |
" Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. (talk)(email) " | 0 |
I've been working on the revamp with BarnabyPage. I swapped in the revamp temporarily to compare drafts; the new one is much longer of course. Comparing drafts, it's hard to see that I kept almost all of the original material, but since it's been moved about (and occasionally copyedited) it may not be visible, but it's there, generally. IF people have comments or suggestions please give them now; I'll try to swap in the new version in perhaps Wednesday. | 0 |
Think about joining project Texas?
Hey there,
I wanted to ask you if you would like to join us in working on Wiki project Texas.
Happy Editing! | 0 |
this was done in 2012, your opinion seems to be quite biased and based on your pov, things that should not factor in. the references are clear and the correct term has been used then and now. 96.231.161.128 | 0 |
Every eejit owns a car. Many of them have changed spark plugs. Few eejits have been inside a power station, or have spun up a gas turbine. Therefore when they invent something / unmask the gas company conspiracy against gyroscopic water fuel, it's the familiar car in which they visualise it. | 0 |
"
Hip hop music
I replied to you here. cιτγ " | 0 |
So they were both blocked from discussing the matter. So NO solution can be reached. That's some iron-clad logic there, Rschen7754. Great freaking job. | 0 |
I wish to apoligize for starting a stressful argument at Isaac Asimov. As I would like to add some information on Salim I al Sabah, Kabbar, Abdul Aziz ibn Abdul Rahman ibn Saud, Najd, Faisal I, Political Titles of the Ottoman Empire, Warba, Abdulla II al Sabah, the First Kuwaiti Crisis, Abdullah ibn Hussein, Mashian, Failakah, Auhah, al Khalifa, al Jalahima, al Sabah, Abdul Karim Qasim, Jaber III al Ahmad al Sabah, Muhammad I al Sabah, the Second Kuwaiti Crisis, Zaki Arsuzi, Salah al Din Bitar, Ghazi ibn Faisal, Bakr Sidqi, Abdullah II al Sabah, Ahmad al Sabah, Abdul Ilah, and Percy Cox, as well as (obviously) the Anglo-Iraqi Treaty of October 1922, the Turkish Petroleum Company, the Basra-Baghdad Highway, the Berlin-Baghdad Railroad, and the Abudllah Khor Waterway, Nuri al Said, Abdulla III al Sabah, Aramco, the Kuwait Oil Company, and the Anglo-Kuwaiti Treaty of 1899; I would like to inquire as to what objections you might have to my doing so? | 0 |
Since four arbitrators have already declined the case is rejected, unless my knowledge of the Arbitration policy fails me. You might as well get cracking. If you're serious about not delaying the nevitable, that is. Tony Sidaway
Your knowledge fails you, as usual. talk | 0 |
Military Keynesianism
I'm not sure how to request more information, so hopefully this gets somewhere. I wanted to get some sources that discuss the basic definition of military Keynesianism. Thanks. | 0 |
September 2007 (UTC)
The more we learn about weather systems on other planets, the more we will learn about how things work on Earth! It is good to know about the ice caps and history of water on Mars, volcanoes and run away global warming on Venus, hurricane like systems on Saturn, the magnetosphere on Mercury, etc. etc. All this has importance to learning about Earth. 14:17, 12 | 0 |
"
Edit that Sparked Controversy
There is no consensus for a reverted edit that I made in this article (hereafter the “reverted edit”). Therefore, I have not changed this article unilaterally back to my previous version, because that would be against consensus.
This reverted edit was reverted by KillerChihuahua (KC) who not only disagreed with it, but also said (in her edit summary) that the edit was disruptive. I disagree with KC that the edit should have been reverted, for reasons already explained above. I also disagree with KC that this edit was disruptive, and I will now fully and carefully explain why, for the record. This edit that KC reverted was clearly not redundant to any previous edits made anywhere else at Wikipedia, and thus this edit was not made by me in bad faith as part of any disruptive “edit war”.
This discussion of RCOG’s position on “choice” started at the article on fetal pain, and I moved it here for valid reasons. At the fetal pain article, KC wrote: ""Please provide a source that this government institution is 'pro-choice' - abortion is legal in the UK, and that the official govt. chartered college are to make that safe is NOT pro choice."" I therefore investigated and learned that RCOG is not a government institution, that most of their members live outside the UK, that its governing documents do not specifically limit its activities, that many of its members do not have medical degrees, et cetera. So, I concluded that the best place to deal with all of this would be here at the article on the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Here at the RCOG article, I added quite a bit of info, in addition to RCOG’s abortion stance. When I was at the fetal pain article and decided to move to this RCOG article, I repeatedly said so in the fetal pain discussion. I did not sneak over here to try to avoid objections at the fetal pain article.
KC has elsewhere cited five diffs that she says prove this controversial edit was virtually the same as several contested assertions I had made previously. Here are KC’s five diffs: (1) in the fetal pain article, (2) in the fetal pain article, (3) in this RCOG article, (4) in this RCOG article, and (5) in this RCOG article.
None of these five previous edits cited by KC is the same (or virtually the same) as the reverted edit that sparked this controversy. Both KC’s diff (1) and diff (2) show where I inserted a cite to support another editor’s assertion that RCOG is a “pro-choice group”. KC pointed out very clearly at the fetal pain article that she did not think RCOG was a “pro-choice group” even though she thought RCOG could have a “pro-choice position” on particular issues:
There is no uncertainty or ambiguity that KC argued RCOG may have a pro-choice | 0 |
"==Note==
I've reverted your removal of info from Types of abortion restrictions in the United States - I think your concern makes sense (that the mandatory ultrasound is to make abortions more costly, time-consuming, or expensive for the patients) and we could add information on that, but I'm not sure that the statement about a goal of the ultrasound being to show the fetus to the patient is entirely spin (also, it's sourced). It's acknowledged that it's not for a medical purpose, and I tried hard not to convey ""seeing the baby makes the mother decide to keep it! omg!"" but if I've failed in that and there's better language I could use, perhaps you could help me out. – (talk ⋅ contribs) " | 0 |
You didn't paste it on the page. Follow the link I provided... | 0 |
"
Boys suits
Ebla Kids Collection EKC
Wholesalers & Manufacturer of boys suits, boys tuxedos, boys formal wear, boys school weaer, boys uniform suits, Page Boys Suits Since 1989
Farzat Naqashieh The owner & Chief Executive Officer, Moutaz Naqashieh The Regional Director, Mohamed Naqashieh The Director of Public Relations
Www.ebla-kids.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs)
But what did that have to do with Edge of Destiny? I deleted you once now if you insist this information is needed on the discussion page, tell me what for. " | 0 |
"
anonymous editors
Yes. Not sure what your point is though? Especially since:
If you bothered to checked that users history, that IP has been making changes to that article and other articles on wikipedia for months now, and has also been advised to warned repeatedly so it is certainly not a ""newcomer"" and is well aware of the dangers of editing an established, featured article with an unlogged IP.
In which case, I did advise the user to create a username and account. So, again, i'm note sure what you are trying to insinuate, and that you should clarify. Or, ironically, the newcomer policy could apply to you as well as being clear, courteous, calm, interested, and respectful.
" | 0 |
Lol dynamic IP. Just you try to stop me! 82.132.214.222 | 0 |
": Peyna, I do not believe that they are acting in ""good faith"", and here's why; I have demanded many times that they abide by Wikipedia policies that ""content must be based on verifiable sources""; Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia: Cite sources, Wikipedia:Verifiability, and Wikipedia:Reliable sources, they have not done so. I have outlined at length and in detail their errors, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:History_of_Indian_and_Arabic_numerals#Vertaloni.2C_examples_of_errors_in_your_version, and elsewhere on that page. Had they been acting in ""good faith"" they would've abided by Wikipedia policies and provided verifiable, reliable sources for every claim in dispute. They sure seem to have plenty of time given how dedicated they are to a revert war. csssclll 051211.
" | 0 |
"
First I'm a little obsessive with unfounded criticism. Sorry about that, It makes me long-winded. I'm not at all obcessive with this topic- which I could give two deuces about- once it is properly sourced and defined.
User:Brangifer has a lot to say about me. Perhaps one example of unreliable sourcing as described to show good faith? It shouldn't be difficult. I assumed good faith and ask for one example, never got. No shred of anything to indicate good faith on his part except a WP:policy-based assumption. Is it an assumption of bad faith to ask for proof or evidence that should not be difficult to provide? Is is bad faith not to provide it? It not a search warrant I'm seeking. He implies I have a pattern of it. I have seen zero evidence to the contrary, so as far as I'm concerned, to me his edit make him comes across as a full-blown, straight-up liar.
Read that carefully as I didn't say he is a liar (name-calling). It's just that without one specific example for his accusations against me, he surely come across as one with his recent edit. I've been assured this is not an attack and is an acceptable use.
""What you have provided on the article talkpage has been viewed by other editors as advocacy of a conspiracy theory.""
Let me get this straight, Rule#1 is that A conspiracy theory can have no evidence. Rule#2 There is none to have that's even remotely related. Rule#3 So none can be considered.
It's a made up theory. However, (paranoid) people's crazy theories are usually based on some remote kernel of truth. Kernels of truth in wild theories have documentation. It does not validate the theory and there is not reason not to consider current beliefs against past history. The source says 1970s which I pointed out, gets added to the entry, source disappears. WP is full of rule followers who can't think logically or realize when they are being made to lay down in the $hit sources they picked for themselves.
I provided public domain information documented by and available from unimpeachable sources as a hey look at this and tell me if it's it related to this subject (It is). Then the accusations start. Unfounded ones.
I'm not advocating for any conspiracy. Not one of those four links did either. The info was 40-50 years old.
Seen as advocacy of a conspiracy?
Which conspiracy?
And which other editors?
Problem with sourcing? Which source?
I need an example to show good faith. This is not court but show me that the accusations have merit. With out one example, It proves they knew what they said about me they knew to be untrue. The concerns mentioned are made up any without any merit. Hence- the lie.
It is a personal attack because I told him that these accusations were offensive to me, yet it continued. My exact words were ""To accuse me of being a believer in this crap is offensive to me and is taken as personal attack."" I told this person numerous times that I am not a believer yet he continues to accuse me of being some nutjob is an attack. ""Believers"" don't cite reliable verifiable unimpeachable sources or say the theory is complete BS.
Posting that my sourcing is bad when there is nothing to show that, is an attack. It was not in good faith. It's made up because not one example can be provided to substantiate it or the good faith intent. If it was good faith, one example should have been able to be provided in order demonstrate and substantiate his good faith. If we had that, there never would have been a problem with what was said. The comment is simply untrue as I've stated and he knew it. This is no difference of opinion as he has characterized it.
Look at it from my point of view, Would you like if I said?
Go edit somewhere else.
You are a full blown believer and pusher of the chemtrail conspiracy theory and your use of unreliable sources to do it doesn't exactly help your credibility?
If I have zero evidence how can I say it in good faith or without attacking you?
You've said ""Baldly stating that another editor who has commented in good faith is a liar is unequivocally a personal attack, and is not tolerated."" How else does one responded to a bald-faced lie?
A barefaced (or bald-faced) lie is one that is obviously a lie to those hearing it.
My intent, since I came upon this piece o' crap entry was to hold other editors' feet to the fire to ensure good sourcing. The entry needs definition and the current one is based on Stieg. There is a source that has been in use for (7?) years that each of these expeienced editors have insisted on using and reverting back to. Rather than hold feet to fire -because no one will let m | 0 |
butts
one mans vandalism is another mans lmao | 0 |
Realpolitik?
In my school days, Von Bismarck was referred to as someone who was practically a living representation of realpolitik. But in the article, I can't find anything about it. Should it be added or am I missing something? | 0 |
"
File:Bigdigtips.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bigdigtips.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. hi! " | 0 |
"
Since some users have caused problems in the past, I wanted to let you know in advance that I have taken some source material on another page that had expired citations, condensed the information through careful edits, and have spent ""hours"" making certain that all of the facts and citations are valid and follow wikipedia guidelines. I just wanted to let you know this now, in case another problem arises. Is there someone who I can get take a look at it or make appropriate changes so that the edit will not be blocked in case a user attempts to tear it down again. " | 0 |
":::::::Things like ""in my experience"", ""seems to"", and ""from my experience"" are examples of what is considered original research here on Wikipedia. Wikipedia policy is that only wp:verifiable information can be placed in the articles. While the references you point to might make a nice addition to the Montessori method article, I didn't see anything relevant to the educational accreditation article. Note that those references still don't seem to support your assertions on this talk page, at least not directly enough for them to go into any Wikipedia article. Thanks,
" | 0 |
Thıs ıs an outrıght and outrageous lıe. There ıs no Byzantıne Flag wıth a crescent moon. There never was and there never wıll be. Ho wabout some responsıbılıty wıkıpedıa? Do you now prınt lıes? | 0 |
Bold text blah blah blah who cares !! ya terts | 0 |
"
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to United Arab Emirates. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " | 0 |
You can undo and block all you want, but it will stay in history forever. | 0 |
"
Hello Bplavsic, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Table of contents
Department directory
Need help?
Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia
How you can help:
Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help
Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity
Additional tips...
Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your ""signature"" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
Bplavsic, good luck, and have fun. – talk " | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.