text stringlengths 1 29.3k ⌀ | label float64 0 1 |
|---|---|
Racism==
I can't believe there's no section on racism since their founder was an avowed racist eugenicist. I'll try write it up, and will use sources.
== | 0 |
I think we have the luxury of a slightly higher resolution categorisation though. I've de-catted Almas, Mothman and UFO's; I agree the Jersey Devil qualies due to the whole demon connection. Happy editing! (t) 18:34, 2005 May 26 (UTC) | 0 |
I followed up the reference and am re-writing the sentence. All the best: Farmbrough, 17:50, 2 May 2015 (UTC). | 0 |
"
The O&Q; bought on December 3, 1883, the extensive charter of the Atlantic & Northwest and used it to build from the Lachine bridge over the St.Lawrence River to Mile End, a distance of 9 miles. There it went its terminal by 1893 and later to Windsor Station when it was built. The O&Q; built the ""Montreal Extention"" from Smiths Falls to the St. Lawrence River. This is how the O&Q;/CPR got from Perth to Montreal. The O&Q; never went to Quebec City.
00:46, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC) (former O&Q; shareholder!)" | 0 |
". I say ""page"" way too much" | 0 |
Funny how much you can write without providing useful information... As mentioned above, it is not OR. So, what was your reason to remove the sentence in the first place ? | 0 |
Jungle Fight
About your comments:
01. They had 11 events in 2011 and 10 in 2012. Why would you revise that number upwards? Ten seems to be a good number for a serious organization. JF is the largest organization in Brazil.
02. Jungle Fight had exactly five title fights in 2012. Two in JF 47, two in JF 37, one in JC 36.
03. Their events are shown on ESPN outside Brazil since JF 20. In Brazil, their events started to be shown before that.
04. About their number of fighters, it's better if you keep the rules simple. For example, require that at least 50 fighters fought in the organization in the span of a year. What do you think about that?
I know it seems weird for Jungle Fight to have the same or more points than Strikeforce, but we have other options instead of gaming the system against Jungle Fight. The current way to determine what is a top or second tier organization puts full weight on the rankings, while your system gives minimal weight to it. I think we should find a middle ground, while at the same time keep things as simple as possible. In order to do so, I would scrap criteria 3 and 8, and use a criteria based on rankings determined by Fight Matrix. That criteria could amount to 1/3 or 1/2 of all possible points. The advantages would be that the main organizations would certainly be ahead of other, while at the same time event short lived but notable organizations would have a high score. By using Fight Matrix, we would be able to easily determine how many points defunct organizations would have. Maybe we could present such a system as a possible substitute to the current way we use to determine notability? | 0 |
"
Split ""Historical Constitutions"" into separate article?
I suggest that a separate article be created dealing with the history of previous Philippine constitutions. The 1987 Constitution should be the main focus of this article. But at present, such historical discussion outweighs the discussion of the present 1987 Constitution. I can work on both articles, but I'd like a consensus first on this proposal. " | 0 |
"
::Gren, not in my whole talk did I ever mention that ""images are not allowed in Islam"". It is your prejudiced thought that is again forcing you to be conservative and narrow-minded. The whole purpose for me to take part in this dialogue is to present my ideas that the posting of the depiction is unfair!!!
:::Hojimachong, I would much rather be happy to get a quick response to my argument by removing the false depiction thus making Wikipedia more authentic and accurate. 08:22, 18 February 2007 (UTC
::::You ain't fooling anyone,
:::::No sock-puppet accusations. They do no good. If you have some information to that end deal with it with check user or however you must. グレン
::::::Checkuser instructs us not to bring forth obvious disruptive (e.g. one who engages in personal attacks) sockpuppets, who are instead to be unceremoniously blocked. Or do you disagree?
If you would care to read the discussion that has been ongoing for over a month, you would know that it isn't going to be removed because of the whims of one editor. talkcon
I still am open for refuting that tirade against me, Checkmeout. talkcon
:Since you seem not want to repost your rant on my talk page, I'll respond here.
:*Quoting me out of context isn't appropriate. The very next sentence was: ""I try hard to make Wikipedia be neutral, and not give undue weight to any religion, including Christianity."".
""this encyclopedia is operated by narrow-minded individuals who least care about authenticity of the material posted on their website."" Considering the amount of time myself and other editors have spent on this page, your blanket allegations I find extremely offensive, though not as much of your allegation of me as a ""Christian-radical editor"".
""I am sure that if you re-analyze the entire argument, you would find that the reasoning presented by most people in this little discussion board is fair, and a decision to remove the picture undistorted by emotion would finally be made."" For lack of a better word, this seems like hypocrisy to me. You ask me to ""review the arguments"", though you yourself demonstrate in your edits that you have not done this. talkcon ]
Do you even think I care about you as an individual being offended when you do not care about several others being offended by the FRADULENT information posted by your website? My words could be offending to you in your understanding, but for me it is the TRUTH. And for Mr. Gren, you are the one who is falsely-accusing and forcing your own idealogies of ""images are not allowed in Islam"" to others. If anyone needs to be labelled as sock-puppet, it would be you. And dear friends, don't even bother to post a reply because guess what, I have left the building and I am not interested in continuing dialogue because I don't see any fairness from your side. There is a saying that, ""You can't straighten a dog's tail by putting in a hose pipe"" and that perfectly applies to you because no matter how much reasoning and arguments are presented, you would have your own preconceived ideas . Thank you and come again!
I couldn't agree more. It is apparent that User:Hojimacho has a closed mind and no matter how many arguments are presented to him, he will stick to his opinions out of shear stubborness and ignorance. Thanks " | 0 |
I don't believe a link to Peace Air's online reservations site really falls in line with the neutrality that Wikipedia promotes, so I'm going ahead and deleting that link. Thanks. | 0 |
BISE
LemonMonday, I thought I would repeat here what I have already said to you on other article talk pages. As far as I am concerned the WP:BISE project is dead. I was the last person to post there on 6 February and before that it was the 3 December 2010 that there was any activity. There are many item there which have not been actioned and both the Admin's that were involved have disappeared. For my part I will continue to abide by the general WP guidelines and if I see articles that uses the term BI incorrectly I will discuss on the talk page and look at resolving the issue within WP guidelines.
You have say that you cannot be bother reporting me for what you consider violations but you seem to have the time to troll my edits and then reverting me using BRD as your excuse (while admitting the in the cases using BI could be wrong). You actions could be considered WP:Hounding. | 0 |
Unfortunately, it's a small part of the vandalism I've had to revert. | 0 |
Notability?
WP:NOTE requires that a topic have coverage in reliable third party sources (independant of the subject) to be considered notable. As of yet, I don't find this to be the case with this article. Please not that I am not saying that DragonRealms is not notable... only that there is no statement as to why it is notable in the article, and no sources to demonstrate this notability. At the moment, the only section that is properly sourced is the section on the Hoax... which indicates that the Hoax might be notable, but not the game itself. | 0 |
Sealand/MPLX
Thank you for your comments about Sealand and MPLX. I was beginning to think I was the only one who had picked up on his game. I'm happy to work with you to try to restore a degree of neutrality back into the article. 07:09, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC) | 0 |
"
Image tagging
Hi, Pece. Thanks for the kind note! Sorry I haven't been able to answer your messages. I've had a lot of work and studying to complete, which is why I'm stressed. As for the images, you'll find all the tags at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags. The information needed should be on the websites and on the aforementioned Wikipedia page, but if you need any help, just leave a note at my talk page. Regards, 123 (talk) " | 0 |
Leaf
The last few days I have been working in this article. I think it is now optimal. Could you take a close look at it and rephrase where necessary. 19:14, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC) | 0 |
"
I appreciate this. I reverted with just that 1 sentence 1 source addition. I then requested to discuss it at the Talk page. Question So should I have first discussed it at the Talk page, and then asked it was acceptable for the article? I thought on wikipedia I'm free to add something, and then discuss it. Also, they reverted me. I added the simple 1 sentence, and they reverted me 5+ times. I'm not sure why the focus is on me warring with them, because they reverted me. Could you clarify this? Again, I added the simple sentence and national source (Outside Magazine) and I then asked to discuss it, and they reverted it 5+ times. MONGO cited reasons such as the person is deceased, that the person took ""only 1 pill"" of the prescription steroid (Outside article is on the use of steroids for performance enhancing on Everest), he commented in the Talk section that I should not be against the mountaineer, etc. These all seem very unacceptable. Highly biased journalism. Almost laughably so. And he didn't care to discuss it. Fact: The climber was reveled by Outside to have taken it, the Outside article is on ""Climbers Little Helper"", subtitled ""a dangerous trend in mountaineering: rampant use of performance-enhancing drugs, particularly the powerful steroid dexamethasone.""
http://www.outsideonline.com/fitness/Climbings-Little-Helper.html
Section on Kellogg is 30+ paragraphs down the article.
If such a simple, factual addition causes this horrible upheaval on wikipedia, I'm baffled.
Also, MONGO followed me to 3 totally unrelated articles. Clearly he was following/stalking me, rather than editing articles he is interested in. And, he got away with it, even with administrators who laughed with him about it all. They do derisory posts, give each other barnsters, and laugh about their control over a novice wikipedia user.
" | 0 |
for later reference
not the first time NuclearVacuum has deleted referencing. see Gliese 581c history.
(Proxima Centauri)
Please, do not remove references when cleaning up articles, as you did from Proxima Centauri. This does not improve the articles and is not part of the cleanup process. Spacepotato (talk) | 0 |
This article seems like advertising to me. It should be removed or striped down to the core. | 0 |
"
Very clever, Creutzfeldt, though to first hold forth with strong opinions on something you quite evidently knew absolutely nothing about, and then, after a cursory skim, to blather your opinions for a lot longer, seems out of character for a supposed expert in ""mathematical logic"" (a claim of yours I find very dubious), not to mention someone trained by ""the Jesuits"" (I hope you're seeing a counselor). Moreover, you can't even apply your ""logic"" consistently Apparently, it seems quite reasonable for a 9/11 Conspiracies encyclopedia page to discuss, at length, claims about a remote-controlled rocket having hit the Pentagon, and other unlikely scenarios for which there is a complete ""absence of evidence,"" than for this espionage puzzle, for which there is some evidence, and an interesting flurry of mainstream media attention, but not yet enough evidence for a firm judgement. It would be good someday to have a proper explanation about the ""Israeli art students"" mystery, and not just your peremptory and prejudiced dismissal of it as ""fucking bollocks"" (I guess the Jesuits trained you in that particular science). In short, as I have said elsewhere, get over yourself. This overweening weenie-ness of yours is unseemly, as well as wilfully stupid. Practice your multiplication tables, keep up with your super-duper-secret-crypto code-book, work hard, and someday you will grow to be a man. Perhaps the hardware store will have a job for you. Anyway, I don't really care what you think, and I'm not even a zealous or crazed proponent of the ""art students"" theories. I just thought that it was something interesting to consider in the 9/11 context, something requiring clarification, something that merits, at the least, a bit of consideration. It pisses me off, though, when know-it-all knuckleheads like you arrogate to themselves the right to decide the difference between heresy and blasphemy. Maybe you should go back to the Jesuits for further training. " | 0 |
Thank you for deleting those pix
Hey Athaenara - thanks for that - it sorted out this message sent to The Skier of Dudiness | 0 |
BlackPearl you must be very un educated with computers then 86.158.238.188 | 0 |
rat...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Khoikhoi Cockkhoi to be mop )))) lol | 0 |
"
Welcome!
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ''' (talk)''' " | 0 |
Also Landestheater Coburg needs translation from de wiki. | 0 |
Janis Joplin
I had to go back and see who was responsible for the terrible bit of misinformation in Janis Joplin. I assumed it was someone young and unfamiliar with the history of rock 'n' roll. 1958, huh? Nope. You're definitely old enough to know better. Shame on you! (No response expected but if you haven't already, go back and read the changes to your verbiage about Joplin being an innovator, 'cause you definitely need educating.) Your erroneous text is precisely the kind of thing black people talk about when we speak of cultural appropriation. Downright disgusting. | 0 |
I'm travelling out of town until after Easter - so I'll response to it - but I'll have to go into more detail after Easter. | 0 |
Husky Stadium (University of Washington)| | 0 |
Trajectories (Help Please)
Can someone please add the trajectories again if you can find them because someone deleted them and if you can find out the sales for the album each week for the Billboard 200 that would be great. | 0 |
If it is allowed, you can't enforce you request, am I wrong? ( I am trying to understand) | 0 |
You seem to haunt Bourrie's life and derogatory Wikipedia entries about him. | 0 |
I was told I need to give you 30 days to fulfill my request.122.49.151.145 | 0 |
MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Abandoned Drafts/Robb Alvey
Wikipedia:WikiProject Abandoned Drafts/Robb Alvey, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Abandoned Drafts/Robb Alvey and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Abandoned Drafts/Robb Alvey during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. fan | 0 |
You are very helpful
Thanks for helping us wikipedians! ) () | 0 |
Okay, they've already been blocked. (talk) (contribs) | 0 |
"
Your Comments/Vote on Davien Crow
You said they do not meet WP:MUSIC. This is not true. You only have to meet 1 requirement to meet WP:MUSIC though some of you are debating over what exactly is an album they have had more than 2 releases on labels, 2 of them independant notables Kidatrim music and Mushroomcloud Records. But the undisputable requirement they meet is having been on a National Tour, They (Davien Crow's Bands) have been on 2. Please reconsider changing your vote, thanks for your time and contributions to wikipedia.
Look the point summarized is I am willing to work with you guys on why these were deleted but until now noone has given us any feedback and has even lied about stuff trying to get it deleted. All 3 of them meet the sufficient amount of requirements for WP:MUSIC, the guidelines in WP:Criteria_for_inclusion_of_biographies, Wikipedia:Importance, Wikipedia:Notability (the fact that suicide girls, gidget gein, and marilyn manson are involved and can be verified in those links should proove that) , Wikipedia:Fame_and_importance mainly the part stating ""There is clear proof that a reasonable number of people are or were concurrently interested in the subject (eg. it is at least well-known in a community)"" If you can't tell the community of Myspace.com and Livejournal.com alone are enough to meet this criterea you are blind. If you do google searches, go to forums and search their names, or visit internet archives you can find un-disputable information on the band from reputable sources, first hand accounts that are years older than these discussions, and intangible archives kept by internet archives. IF you want more detail read my above rant, your right I do sound mad about this, because I can't see how you can say they do not meet criterea or that this is a vanity page. Please accept my apologies for anything you have taken to be rude and please re-consider changing your vote. What Harm could it do ? BTW I am not trying to bully anyone, I can show you the location of the people threatening to come here and vandalize the hell out of Wikipedia. But I do not want that to be part of your decision at all. (please reference the large rebuttle on the discussion page itself)
I have posted this, I hope that some of you will consider looking for my information and reconsider your vote for now. A lot of people are simply responding to the rudeness of user:sin-thetik and some things I said are being misconstrude as threats. I am simply upset because of all the time it took to write these 3 articles, knowing they fit the guidelines, only to have somone delete them with the proof and verifiable facts right in front of them .. just their un-willingness to read them. Please think it over, I appreciate your time. I'm just a fan girl trying to be the first to get an article up about them since I have been running a fan site about them for almost 2 years now.
PLEASE THINK IT OVER " | 0 |
Category:IP addresses used for vandalism | 0 |
Great addition to Hroðgar! If Neil Gaiman has written the script to an upcoming version of Beowulf, it has the promise of becoming a much talked about movie. | 0 |
"
Art and music – ""little interest""?
""He also has little interest in art and music, though he does enjoy reading non-fiction literature."" Where on pp. 206–7 does it say he has little interest in art and music? Modern art and music, fine – but in art and music generally? How can anything on those pages be construed as suggesting as such? " | 0 |
"
Stop using ""loot"", it is not aapropriate
Loot is a very informal word and should not be used when writing serious articles. Given that there are additional grammatical issues, I have tagged it for cleanup. " | 0 |
"
Back in Business
Ring a bell? This one I'm pretty sure is Reece, including the writing style. — · [ ChitChat ] " | 0 |
":::::::::::::@WMC: """"The scientist behind the bogus claim in a Nobel Prize-winning UN report that Himalayan glaciers will have melted by 2035 last night admitted it was included purely to put political pressure on world leaders."""". So the last is NOT wrong. I just gave you a secondary source for the second time. You gave me none. The first one is just reading some of the famous emails... that even we quote.
" | 0 |
Please use edit summaries
Hello. Please be courteous to other editors and use edit summaries when updating articles. The shows your usage of edit summaries to be very low:
Edit summary usage for N328KF: 27% for major edits and 23% for minor edits. Based on the last 150 major and 150 minor edits in the article namespace.
Using edit summaries helps other editors quickly understand your edits, which is especially useful when you make changes to articles that are on others' watchlists. Thanks and happy editing! | 0 |
Thanks for the info. I will postpone acting on further sorting until that issue is resolved.
— | 0 |
Joint Vision for Oceans | 0 |
You obviously have not looked hard enough to find a third party source. If you look at Wale's site, you will find several posts that show where he is popping up in the media, including Rolling Stone and Entertainment Weekly. DO NOT DELETE THIS ARTICLE BECAUSE IT IS SIGNIFICANT. ImJFAT | 0 |
Only if an editor exceeds lawful allowances. | 0 |
"
Thank you! I'm actually really surprised that so many people supported in my RfA - I was expecting to get at least a few opposes. About the bureaucracy, I agree that rules just for the sake of having rules isn't such a good idea. But then again, I have always been of the school that process is important. At AfD, it always pays to remember that admins have to rely on judging how well arguments fit policy when they make their closing decisions. Usually the decisions reflect the votes that people cast, but not always - see this discussion for a good example of what I mean. Let me know if you want to clarify anything, or if you want pick my brain about anything else Wikipedia-related, and I'll be happy to help you out. ) — '''''''''' (have a chat) " | 0 |
OK, I'll have a look over it and let you know what I think | 0 |
REDIRECT Talk:Segunda División 1981–82 | 0 |
I Beg Your Pardon
I beg your pardon, but if I'm asking for objective viewings on my AfD, which has seen little debate thus far from a broad enough sample of people to suite my personal satisfaction. Without participation, process is moot and if that warrants blocking then wikipedia is truly lost.Wikimegamaster | 0 |
Why? The horse is very far from dead. Fatuorum | 0 |
Question
Hi Draeco - I've been trying to update/standardize/add to Canadian Case law pages on wikipedia. I created a template to help me with this, and it's now been nominated for deletion. My question is - I'm having a hard time finding what the standards are for things, and how to know whether something I add will meet wikipedia's requirements. Could you help me and direct me to somewhere where I can read up on this? | 0 |
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Afghanistan&diff;=94694364&oldid;=94693575 This kind] of edits are not allowed. [ | 0 |
Grinders
im from philly and no one really thinks or uses the term grinder. i never heard of it till i moved to pittsburgh for a short stint. i think the article has the use of the word grinder backwords in the first paragraph. grinders are not a philly thing. | 0 |
"::I only quoted Gentry to qualify what had already been referenced in the article. I didn't add the reference, and ""internet author"" is also merely a paraphrase of what had already been referenced. Why, then, revert me? Talk
" | 0 |
response==
I agree with you regarding the game length comment. Playing this game for the first time, it took me over fifty hours to complete. The sheer amount of sidequests and story development make it one of the most complex, if not the most complex, game in the Final Fantasy series. 11:42, 20 January 2006 (PST)
==Game length | 0 |
This was not unanimous and supporters of the Mega Drive name abstained from the vote while Genesis voters have tried to stifle and shut down debate on the subject. | 0 |
Thinking of U )
Hi, Recently from this site Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive128
Where you posted the suspected puppetry of User: Ohmy-Omega
A reply was made by user
This user was recently confirmed as a sock puppet of another user.
See in another TIME !!!! | 0 |
"
Hey I try talking to you the first time, but you won't let me. Fine, tell me what are ""inflammatory"" and I'll talk to you on your talk page, if you don't block it. I won't edit the RFC until we finish talking, ok?" | 0 |
As I have declared earlier, I have no interest in promoting the site of bigjameshenderson.com and not interested in any accomplishments beyond the facts. Please take care in not WP:OUTING me. | 0 |
The fact that you regard it as a nonsense complaint in itself justifies it as a worthwhile complaint. | 0 |
You have raised me to the levels of Galileo. | 0 |
How proud I am to be a Greek!
I am a Greek Nationalist this is nothing to be ashamed of, I believe in fascism and a strong leader, and let me first say that I despise Turks, I have changed the image section to include what I believe is a wider variety of great Greeks from the ages. I really wanted to include Constantine XI or other Byzantine but I couldn't. Perhaps we can work something out? | 0 |
So... no, you won't. Good to know. | 0 |
Removed above quote from Jimtaip, as the source was not provided67.142.130.44 . | 0 |
"::::: ""...we can assess..."" Now would that be the Royal We or you claim to speak for other fellows?
" | 0 |
Be bold
Needs some editing. M. Sarkozy is not President anymore... | 0 |
Congrats
Congratulations on being a published book author. Also on your bold PR stunt of releasing your book on to Wikipedia. I bet anyone who paid twenty or thirty bucks for the book is probably feeling like a total sap right now. Though on the other hand, it might not be such a bad thing to own a paper copy, one not subject to the whims of idiots. You would hope the sharks would limit themselves to updating whatever is outdated in your book. But since the vast majority of them are people who could never even begin to write a book worthty of publication, it is far more likely that your book here will degenerate gradually into something O'Reilly Press would laughingly refuse to consider as the second edition of your book. | 0 |
"
I have no objection but I have no idea which cities are suitable candidates. Perhaps Maastricht, but that has only four articles (out of five). Splitting per per province makes more sense to me. I still have 72 articles to go (plus what is coming at the end of November with the new Guide). See also List of Michelin starred restaurants in the Netherlands and the navigation templates on the article that are already organized by province (except the provinces of Flevoland, Friesland and Groningen that are bundled in one template as they share just 8 restaurants) talk " | 0 |
REDIRECT User:Post Doctorate y-o-y | 0 |
"
On 19:57, 12 August 2012 you (86.150.65.44) made an edit with the edit title ""Revert unauthorised change to my comment by Wtshymanski""
Seven minutes later, on 20:04, 12 August 2012 you posted the above warning.
Diff for your revert
Your change consisted of changing a link. Wtshymanski had it as
Request for Comment
and your revert changed it to
Request for Comment Request
(Is that related to the Department of Redundancy Department?)
Your full paragraph: ""It was not a personal attack but a statement of undisputed fact (and was not even disputed by you at the recent Request for Comment Request, whose outcome you still continue to ignore. The above two points underline the point admirably.""
Your link goes to an RfC that was closed on with an outcome of
""no immediate administrative action appears required. However, I invite Wtshymanski to take the concerns voiced here under serious consideration. Administrative action may be requested if the conduct that has been the focus of this discussion continues.""
When you say ""whose outcome you still continue to ignore"", that implies that he should respond at the link you posted. But he can't. It's closed and has had no comments for months. Furthermore, how can you know whether he is ignoring the advice to take something under serious consideration? The link Wtshymanski provided is where the active discussion is ongoing (last post a week ago at 16:54, 4 August 2012) and the place where one would reasonably expect Wtshymanski to respond. Thus I conclude not only that the edit was reasonable, but that Wtshymanski wants his critics to go to the right place.
I am the first one to come down hard on Wtshymanski when he does something wrong, but only when it is clear that he has actually done something wrong. In my opinion this incident does not rise to that level. It is a debatable correction to a URL that should have been handled with WP:BRD instead of a user warning. Nobody ever made a ruling that WP:AGF does not apply to Wtshymanski. " | 0 |
Actually, that's a fair point. I had assumed that they were unaffiliated, myself, but took the editor's word that they actually were a branch of. I suppose a source would be nice for that, so I won't remove the tag (besides, I don't want to give the impression that sources aren't important). | 0 |
"
Also, about it being my turn to argue back and forth and back and forth and back and forth and back and forth and back and forth with you: You HAVE NOT presented one counter argument against the article revision of yours needing a cleanup/POV check. εαίδεια* " | 0 |
Oh no! I am a strictly serious editor. That was someone else with the same id. Happens all the time. | 0 |
And incidentally I know that much of what Cla68 says via the Reg is false because I was on the mailing list form the outset and I told him it was false and he was rebuffed from the mailing list which is why, I think, he took it to the Reg in order to weasel it in here. Cnyical, shameful, and in the end of no actual lasting relevance or significance. The mailing list still exists. | 0 |
"
Okay. Sorry if I got in your way. (talk, ) " | 0 |
Response from Pakhtun Tanoli
I have provided several references for the Pakhtun origin of Tanolis. You have to see the several works of Tanoli and non-Tanoli historians in the text and the references list at the end of the article. As a social analyst trained in the historical and anthropological analysis and over thirty years of research in this area, along with being a university based academic I feel I have an objective role in this debate. Secondly, I am a son of Malik of one of the septs of Tanolis which has direct role in this debate i.e. the I have access to family and regional sources to bring to the issues directly related to the topic. You username of Raja tells me that you are neither of Pakhtun, Tanoli or Hazara/NWPF origin. Moreover, the sources you quote have been consulted by me and there is no mention of Janjuas in those pages of the texts you quote. Finally, your patronising language is abusive to say the least. Incidently I am in the process of publishing my findings which challenge the Afghanisation theory you are so fond of mentioning - the text is in the process of being refereed by relevant authorities. | 0 |
"
It has been over two months since this block has lasted. During this time I have had time to reflect and see the support and recognition my work here at Wikipedia has been given (See above). The last block was in all honesty misinterpreted. For the Handball at the 2011 Pan American Games, an article which I greatly contributed to I believed it was better to standardize across all the sport sub-pages. So that is what I did and proposed the image to be deleted (because it was not going to be in use). The only other image I proposed to be deleted was the wrong logo of a proposed bid. It was never my intention to edit war, but again GB fan felt otherwise to revert everything I did even when I left valid explanations. I was frustrated at the time and over the past two months have cooled down and am ready to return to the project. TalkContributions " | 0 |
Delete both the Rosevear and the Bowden articles i have merged it all on the Creation Science Movement article, i will tone some of it down at some point maybe, im currently looking for other sources at the moment, il leave it as it is for now. It actually looks ok. | 0 |
Thanks
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my Talk Page. | 0 |
Its time to sing our song!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I love you, you love me, we're all a big happy family... I love you, dont you love me? ( ) | 0 |
Uncle Max
Over the last month there's been a few edits (and reverts) by others regarding Uncle Max as a CBBC programme. It's a fact that it was originally commissioned and transmitted by CITV Channel in 2006 (repeated December 2007). However, since January 2008, it is now being broadcast on BBC One, presumably after the BBC picked up the rights.
Just curious, but what are the reasons for its removal from the CBBC Programmes list? | 0 |
" 2006 (UTC)
Why has Unicode no code point for ""Latin capital letter J with dot above"" assigned? 10:29, 3 June" | 0 |
"
I would suggest removing it but that's up to the editors. I was just pointing out that it is a false claim. If not removed, you might just change the wording to something like:
""In computer simulations, many genes have been shown to potentially occur via frameshift mutations.""
But that doesn't have quite the same ring to it. 76.179.130.102 " | 0 |
"
I will respond on your talk page but there needs to be notability as well as verifiable sources when adding information to biographical articles. In theory you could add a massive family tree that has no real relevance. Chat " | 0 |
"
Bikash, good show !! At last we are getting somewhere. What we have do now pronto is establish ""notability"". Apparently this is very important for Wiki. Usually this means getting a quotation from some great author or Standard History / Encyclopedia (non-copyrighted) to say what a great thing the Brahmo religion is and how mankind has benefitted. We also have to check the article carefully for copyright infringement. I had objected on wikisource to Hem Chandra Sarkar's book, but these Wiki people use USA copyright law. Ronojit, " | 0 |
God
I have learned for myself that your beliefs are not true. Seeing what you're doing right now, I think that you will regret living your life. | 0 |
English is not my native language. Unfortunately in my country English even is not third language so far. | 0 |
Didn't you violate this rule before I did?
1. I added the material
2. You reverted (1 strike)
3. I reverted (1 strike)
4. You reverted (2 strikes)
5. I reverted (2 strikes)
6. You reverted (3 strikes)
So shouldn't you have placed the notice on your page? | 0 |
"
Tyrannosaur grid diagrams
Hey, I saw you had done several other of the grid diagrams for some of the smaller coelurosaurs and was wondering if you had time to do some for the ""Big 5"" tyrannosaurs. Albertosaurus and Gorgosaurus don't have any... shouldn't be too hard, they're pretty identical. Tarbosaurus is grid-less too. Also, the ones currently on Daspletosaurus and Tyrannosaurus (made by some other guy... not DINOguy, let alone DinoGuy2) have a weird scale... on *D* each grid square is .6m on each side, and on *T* they are .9m on each side. Seems like it would make more sense to be a square meter like you have. Plus they have a comma instead of a period, which no English-speaking country uses (this is English Wikipedia after all). So I guess if you have time, could you do those too? I would do them but I'm not sure how you get the outlines you use... do you draw them yourself or are they clipart from somewhere? Thanks a million. " | 0 |
If there are sources then you should add them instead of editwarring by just bringing back the stuff that doesn't have references. | 0 |
Hey baby
Chill dem jets of fire babe | 0 |
"
Image use
Hello, concerning the pictures that have been deleted, I'd like to say that I support their inclusion here. They are not in any way sub-standard and for me they enhance the article. I am surprised by the claim that these were not agreed by other editors. Wiki publications encourage collaborative editing and nothing has to be agreed up front in this way.
This image is clearly a photograph of another photograph, or poster, or leaflet. Not only that, but its a badly framed snapshot, and is obviously the work of an amateur. The image description is missing, and I do not believe that ""own work"" is satisfactory for the source field given my concerns about the image.
MacRusgail you'd have a much easier time if you didn't sling insults and accusations around. of Doom
I agree that that's a poor quality image and shouldn't be included in the article.
Parrot, you still need to inform the image author on commons that you have nominated the image for deletion, also it would help the deletion debate if you could give any reasons for your suspicions.
Regarding the other two images (right), the County Hall one seems reasonable enough, but the festival one is badly framed. The lens is too zoomed in for my liking.
The 'Oss picture conveys the feeling of the festival to me, crowded, almost claustrophobic. Would be nice if the editors who originally objectd came here themselves to give their reasons.
Note that there's also an alternative photo of the festival at File:Red obby oss party 20050502.jpg.
Which doesn't include an 'Oss.
No, and I sense that may be important.
I still fail to see what's so terrible about these pictures. By the way, if you're going to remove pictures, please substitute better ones. That way the article is improved, rather than depleted.
Going through them:
The Cornish language one is maybe the worst of the lot, but the reflection on the image is clearly on the ""Rooms"" banner, not on the photograph. It is difficult to find better images of Cornish language use on Wikimedia. Otherwise we're reduced to road signs which use Cornish place names - and they're really loans into English, rather than proper Cornish language use. Two other options to replace first image are on the right.
There is no way to frame the ""Obby Oss"". It takes place amongst large crowds of people, often on old streets. Other than that, I can't see what the big deal is here.
The County Hall picture is fine as far as I'm concerned. (However, if you wish a better one, there may well be one on Geograph which can be transferred onto Wikimedia.) It's a non-partisan image, and can't be accused of pandering to any political tendency.
""MacRusgail you'd have a much easier time if you didn't sling insults and accusations around."" - If I wished to insult people, I'd use much stronger language! What I object to is the use of deliberately obscure (and dubious) abbreviations to justify edits, without a decent explanation as to why. Personally I would have preferred some kind of reasoning. At least that seems to be happening just now.
""obviously the work of an amateur."" - Most of the images on Wikipedia are amateur by definition. The professionals get paid for their images, and they don't give them away for everyone to use. A bit mean, but that's how things go. Since I live s | 0 |
"had ABSOLUTELY NO RIGHT to cite it as ""spam/vanity"". I do not own, am employed, shop, or even live near Mouse Surplus. You could've tagged it so someone would rewrite, as SENSIBLE users have done, but it's a young article about a company. Why don't you go ahead to List of United States companies and pick off companies at your leisure? It would be a shame if what YOU were doing was Vandalism. Know what? I'm going to rebuild Mouse Surplus, better than what I had it before! And I'm going to save it on my hard disk. (by TLU)
possible AfD?
Hi, I can see that you know more than a little bit about deletions so I want to get your opinion on something. The article Tony Grove is a single sentence which (I think) fails to assert notability per WP:BIO, and it seems doubtful the article could reasonably be expanded. Do you think this is an appropriate candidate for AfD? If so, should it get a ""Prod"" or just get nom'd for AfD? Thanks in advance for taking the time to educate this newcomer! PS - I noticed you are currently located in Milwaukee, WI. You have my heartfelt condolences ) Also, you can respond here when convenient; I've got you on my watchlist.
Hey, I like Milwaukee!
First I'd do some quick google research on the guy, and if nothing came up, then give it a prod tag. If someone de-prods it and you still think he's NN, then go with AfD. Cheers! talk
Thanks Fang! I'll follow your advice. I just had to tease you a little because I spent many years in WI, and I hate snow ) Milwaukee can be fun though, especially The Safe House!
Yes, The Safe House is way cool. I don't like winter either, but, heck, it's home. talk
If it feels like home to you, then it must be...Home. I had already done the Google search as the first step; out of the first 50 hits I previewed only one mentioned the guy, and that was our article ) It seems like it's time for a prod. Very exciting, I've never done this before so, um...er...what do I do?
In the article, add {{prod|Why you think it should be deleted}} at the top. talk
I got the Prod in place per your directions. Thanks for taking so much time to help a newcomer )
Anytime! talk
Deletion: TheListUpdater
I apologize that I exploded over Mouse Surplus, but I would like the original content back so I can hopefully rebuild and rewrite it in the next coming months.
Questions
Hi Fang Aili,
I've been working on a list of questions, slowly deleting those which I could answer myself by checking the various policy pages. The list of questions I'm left with, I feel positive, only has questions that I felt I couldn't answer by checking myself. If you have some spare time, and don't mind answering some of them, please feel free. I've left them on my . Thanks,
For adding to my Userpage
I love the quote you added to my Userpage! If no one else can tag it with an attribution in a few days I'll do it myself and add another quote.
But I'm not going to use...""I say we take off and nuke the site from orbit; after all...it's the only way to be sure.""
Good day, madam
Hey you )
Re: User talk:Allenginzburg
Thanks! ) RadioKirk (|t|c)
Thank you!
Thanks for checking those so quick! ) re: db-bio
Yes, I wasn't sure, and I always appreciate a second opinion. These four are all connected and haven't any reference. They ar | 0 |
Mostrim?
Anybody know when the name Edgeworthstown was put on the town? It is still very commonly known by the locals in English as Mostrim, and indeed the local GAA team is still Mostrim: http://www.google.ie/search?hl=ga&q;=mostrim&btnG;=Cuardaigh&meta;= | 0 |
No we are discussing this right here, mr LOL! | 0 |
"
Can I just say thank you to the wikipedia editor who put the link in for ""Getaltzerfall""? Literally the first thing I did after hearing that in the episode is come here for that, cheers." | 0 |
(of which I'll usually remove those autoblocks) | 0 |
Do sometimes even you get amazed by what gets put in Wikipedia?
As a frequent editor I am sure that you see the whole gambit of odd wiki edits, but that | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.