text stringlengths 1 29.3k ⌀ | label float64 0 1 |
|---|---|
The FAC was in 2011. It's 2015 now and the RfC – whether you like how it was set up or not – is showing a number of established users with no previous input saying that the article could do with being edited. Pretending it's not happening won't change that. You have indeed been respectful in your suggestions, but others most certainly have not. And why waste time editing an article that's likely to become a redirect if the outcome of the RfC is to edit this article? | 0 |
"Furthermore, you substantiate my allegation that ""Mr. Hinckley has gone out of his way in public interviews (such as on the Larry King show) to explain that he has neither prophesied anything, nor wishes to."" What I meant is along the lines of what you meant when you wrote 'he doesn't call himself a prophet.' " | 0 |
Demotion
I've culled the alumni list, but this article still has a number of issues, for example copy/paste and paraphrasing issues as I've noted above and dead links. It's therefore demoted to C class. | 0 |
"
So Cochrane states that oseltamivir prevents flu you want to use the CDC to refute that? (talk · contribs · email) " | 0 |
Thanks.
I'm looking forward to reading your reply. | 0 |
Thanks!
Thanks for finishing the work on Huskies of Honor that I started. I appreciate it. You might want to consider creating an account to enjoy all the benefits of becoming a full editor, such as the ability to edit semiprotected pages. If so, you might also want to check out Wikipedia:WikiProject University of Connecticut, where fans of the university are working to improve articles related to the school and its teams. Any registered editor is free to join. Grondemar | 0 |
Vandalism won't be tolerated queer. | 0 |
How is that notice related? | 0 |
You MUST block the guy that attacked me or i am reporting this violation of my civil rights.
I don't know who you are and who you think you are.
Your menacing statement will be printed and sent to the california state department, Wikipedia is already at peril with the state and this violation will contribute to make it even more popular.
If you don't block the other guy you must unblock me, i am telling you, i won't let you go this time. | 0 |
That comment explains a lot about your own bias Willbeback. I had suspected that you are a Christian fundamentalist. Nice that you attribute that quote to yourself. Again, you have ignored my questions. | 0 |
Stop trolling, you will be blocked from editing. | 0 |
You still never answered the question. If you are so concerned about objective editing on Wikipedia then why is OK to have three articles about three movies that John Moyer is responsible for writing, and or producing, and directing? Articles that many people have contributed to, why is NOT OK to have a page about the individual that is responsible for those movies? I don't see you demanding those articles be removed because they are of no consequence and are not noteable. If you reason that the articles about The Singles Ward, The R.M. and Mobsters and Mormons then there should be an article about their creator. Now please answer the question posed. | 0 |
MrBigB
I'm not sure how many reverts I've done on the Thanos article, but I thought I'd let you know I'm going to leave it alone now and let an admin deal with Big, who has definitely reverted more than three times but who now seems to be doing it anonymously in order to avoid the 3RR. Consensus seems to be against his additions, but I'll leave it up to you. | 0 |
Infobox
Okay. We have a disagreement about the infobox.
Let's try to work it out here, rather than edit warring over the article.
First off, let me present my position:
This is an encyclopediac article, or at least it should be. As such, it should contain all significantly relevant information, and it should prioritize the information someone would want to find most easily.
Kaiser's logo is relevant to anyone who wants to know about Kaiser, it seems Wikipedia considers the identity of the CEO of an organization relevant, and their website seems almost required - if someone, for instance, came to Wikipedia in order to find the website, they should be able to do so moderately easily; Kaiser's website should, in an article about Kaiser, stand out from all other links in some way.
Okay. someone who disagrees with me care to present your position on the situation? | 0 |
You will note that I have suggested arbitration three times on the page history notes, and also on here. How would I go about doing this myself. Also, the line 'Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block' is very pertinent. I inserted a cited and pertinent fact about Ms Monroe, so it is MY work that is being removed. Your warning is in the wrong place. 82.41.251.96 | 0 |
"
A lot of information can be found on the net of in books (eg. ""The A-Z of record labels"" by Brian Southall). " | 0 |
Vandalism on the WeatherStar 4000 article
Repeated vandalism will NOT be tolerated. I've experienced the same thing when I frequently visited the SpongeBob SquarePants article and related articles when some vandals were adding false info. PLEASE do not vandalise these pages, or else they will be reverted and locked. The WeatherStar 4000 does NOT have many of the same features as the XL or Intellistar. If they did, where did you find the info? Cite your sources or don't edit the page at all. Use common sense or be banned from Wikipedia.
THIS IS A RESPONSE TO ALL THE RECENT VANDALISM. | 0 |
quick note
Dear Flex,
The new Wiki Conservapedia could use some contributors to expand its articles on Christianity - especially its Christian apologetics articles. The site is more friendly to Christianity than Wikipedia. It is also less liberal. jazzman123 | 0 |
Help please
hey there, i heard you deleted my page about a gang & i was wondering can you help me improve it cuz as you see kind of i am a wiki rookie & i dunno much about it i am not askin for infomation i am just wondering if you could give me some specific info about makeing it alot more yer know ... obiding by tha rulez & not getting deleted by admin's & wikipedians with potentials like yourself for example, if you get a chance to look at this message send one back on my talk with info about improvement, hear is my practice page ( User:KieranKiwiNinja/North Liverpool Jetz ) | 0 |
"
Hamas
Please stop Rev my edits in the ""2006 Israel-Gaza conflict"" section of Hamas if you have a dispute about the Humman Rights bit with someone else, fine! but please don't Revert my factual section along with it.
Kindly restore this section. Thanks. " | 0 |
Of course I will behave this time...I don't want more roses -) | 0 |
Saudia Arabia
Thanks for your note. I've done some more. | 0 |
. A famous type of trolling | 0 |
Unfortunately, as mentioned, the sides aren't working to a consensus. Whenever a valid point is raised, the opposing side vetos it, attacks it with wikilawyering, and sometimes deletes it unitlaterally. | 0 |
ATTENTION: owners of this site
You may want to take mod rights away from this guy, he is abusing his powers by reverting several factual edits all over the site. | 0 |
"
Your fine editing work
I have noticed your sharp editing work on the Jesus on Mars ""bookreport"" that I did. As well as observing that my proofing skills need some work, I am also encouraged by seeing that my work merited the time and effort you took to CopyEdit the article." | 0 |
Wrong decision
You have atlast removed the picture ShaikhChandScan.jpg. for some silly reasons. I guess a responsible administrator should first get to the roots and then take a decision. It was a harsh and hasty decision. When no one from Wikipedia:India objects to the image, who are you to object and remove the picture. Kindly restore it or let the administrators from Wikipedia:India decide about the fate of the picture. Cheers | 0 |
Wikipedia has a number of policies and guidelines. A policy is an important principle that must be followed while creating articles, while a guideline is just a loose rule that a lot of editors agree with.
Check out Wikipedia:Simplified ruleset for some of the policies and other important stuff. | 0 |
Thanks
...for pointing out my accidental deletion of an entire paragraph. I have no idea how it happened, but I fixed it. Message in a bottle | 0 |
User:Cush
I'm not sure how this works. I called someone an inappropriate name on my user page, and you blocked me for 24 hours. So I was wondering whether this might also be grounds for some sort of discipline.
Thanks. - | 0 |
"
Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. (T | C | k) " | 0 |
"
""Microsoft Internet Explorer"" vs ""Internet Explorer""
Just a small detail, but I couldn't help but notice that Microsoft Internet Explorer is listed simply as ""Internet Explorer,"" while other browsers (i.e. ""Mozilla Firefox"" and ""Netscape Navigator"") are listed under their full names. Should ""Internet Explorer"" be renamed to ""Microsoft Internet Explorer"" in this article, or should ""Mozilla Firefox"" be listed as ""Firefox"" and so on? " | 0 |
This is confusing. Pandelika wants me to remove content. What? | 0 |
In Ostrobothnia redirect page, Porvoo article etc.. You too have accused me of propaganda, thats PA. Btw take a look at this. | 0 |
Sorry Golbez, you're not a adminstrator. So you can't protect anything. You need to stay out of this now. 70.121.33.78 | 0 |
"
Blocked
You have been temporarily blocked from editing because of your disruptive edits. You are invited to contribute in a constructive manner as soon as the block expires. — (push to talk) " | 0 |
Thank you, Go. Your attention and consideration are greatly appreciated. I perceive that the forceful intervention and excellent advice and direction provided by | 0 |
Not enough as sock puppets have demonstrated again and again. | 0 |
OK, the references are in the text. Not quite what I wanted. Will continue to work on this. Markup language is not transparent to some of us!! | 0 |
Changeover occurs at Acton Central to/from overhead AC. The freight spur is not electrified. | 0 |
thanks, i am glad to be back. | 0 |
''Copying above to Wikipedia talk:Fair use. __ | 0 |
Yeah. See, what happened is I noticed there was LS Magazine in ja.wikipedia, and not here. So I didn't really check if there was anything similar here - only until AFTER I translated the article and tagged it with CP category - and went to browse it that I noticed there was LS Studio with some information already covered in this article. Perhaps a merge of anything that's new in this article, into LS Studio, and then a redirect would be a good idea. timecop | 0 |
for the mistakes I made. | 0 |
Welcome!
Hello, Nucleus55, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! | 0 |
Lenore Skenazy edit
The information that was included was correctly sourced. Thank you. | 0 |
Wikiproject rating
I don't know if it's considered bad form to rate an article that you've been working on, but I feel confident in giving it a C on all projects, since I added the prose and everything. — | 0 |
":::: If I built a topic around a film director/producer, and the articles were only the articles that the person directed and not those that he produced, would you think that is acceptable? The person is more well known as a director than a producer, but has done a substantial number of films in both fields. Thoughts? (Please post reply on my talk page, again, thanks!) (talk)
" | 0 |
Avenue Road
The article was made into a redirect to the street name origin and the information was supposed to have been transferred elsewhere, but that information doesn't appear to be on University Avenue (Toronto). Since Bloor Street and Danforth Avenue appear to be separate, I've restored the article. If you feel otherwise, let me know and we can hash it out. | 0 |
"Welcome!
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! matrix
Demonyms
I've reverted your changes to Dartmouthians and Haligonian. These are unlikely to expand beyond mere stubs, and the practice on Wikipedia is to redirect denonyms to their respective articles (eg - Canadian -> Canada, Albertan -> Alberta etc.). matrix " | 0 |
It's cool man
I got no beef with you. I just got upset with Geoff being all nasty for one little mistake. And fanboys refusing to admit Wesker survived is annoying.
Anywaym thanks for the welcome. ) | 0 |
July 2005 (UTC)
Your assumptions as to my intentions are incorrect. I am not motivated to convince you of anything. I am not motivated to include any specific example. As I've stated quite clearly, and my actions verify, I am here to create an NPOV definition of terrorism. You can help those of us who are trying to resolve the NPOV dispute by suggesting wording that does not create a primary or secondary source. Your entire introduction is a historic generalization which would be considered a secondary source if it were based on axioms or primary sources. Even if the creation of secondary sources were allowed in Wikipedia (which it is not), I can't find any credible evidence to support the assertions you derive. If you are honestly trying to promote an objective introduction for terrorism, I suggest that you help us start from the beginning and add descriptions that can be cited or that are at least generally accepted by other editors. 18:30, 23 | 0 |
"
List of Cities on the Great Lakes
You said that Leamington, Ontario was not categorized, but should be...does that mean if i put it in the category of cities on the great lakes, then it could be listed on that article? • Talk • Stalk " | 0 |
:HT48RXX I/O type series
A tag has been placed on HT48RXX I/O type series, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. / talk / contribs | 0 |
Yeah your welcome. If you need to ask me a question or anybody else, just let us know. See you later. | 0 |
You have not read that discussion correctly. Forget the closing remarks: the usage was deemed not to meet our policies. - | 0 |
|decline=It's much better if you don't write about yourself on Wikipedia. :==( o ) | 0 |
BUT User:Amortias i didnt attack you. Is it A-MORE-SHOUS or A-MORE-TEE-AS | 0 |
April 2007
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Disgust, you will be blocked from editing. | 0 |
Cthulhu
Oh, don't pout. Strictly speaking, I only did two reverts. | 0 |
]]
[[/Archive 26|See archive 26 | 0 |
"
This is not a big deal to me, but if we could trim it down to ""representing Media Matters to news media"", I could go with that. Specifying Burns as such is due to Brock being the notable founder, and the target right wing partisans choose to shoot at, so it is not that obvious who represents the organization, if one were to listen to, say, Mark Levin about MM. " | 0 |
"
Tooltip texts to ""Skip if no cat changed"" and ""Remove sortkey""
Wikipedia_talk:AutoWikiBrowser/Feature_requests#Add_tooltip_texts_to_.22Skip_if_no_cat_changed.22_and_.22Remove_sortkey.22 is something for you probably. ) " | 0 |
"
Hello Tim, well I certainly have the inclination and as for the time, well that's freed up somewhat on the work front, so I'm now finding a few extra hours to myself. I will finish off Horne for Gavin and pop along to Sir Ralph immediately after. Hopefully by then, my new Robey book would have arrived and I can get the old sod finished. Talk " | 0 |
"
Why doesn't ""Danzig"" direct here? I find it hard to believe more people are looking up a Polish city than the man.
i believe the city of danzig is more widely known of than Glenn danzig
There is trouble with maintainers of Gdansk (the city) page, apparentlly they consider their town extremely important and Danzig the band extremely obscure.. ) We'll work on it, until then there is disambiguation link on top of the Gdansk page. " | 0 |
most likely wasps. they also have a web like substance that they use to build nests and they fly and can grown very big. watch out their sting can carry quite a punch. hope that helps 05:39, July 13, 2005 (UTC) | 0 |
urev) 03:27, 26 April 2014 MXocrossIIB (talk | contribs) . . (4,450 bytes) (+271) . . (undo)
(cur | prev) 02:54, 26 April 2014 Davey2010 (talk | contribs) . . (4,179 bytes) (+304) . . (ntil | 0 |
"
Snowded: When will you get around to addressing the issue that all the listed sources are germane, and get away from personal judgments like ""I realise you don't understand how anyone could possibly disagree with you but..."" and ""I've probably read a lot more on this subject than you Brews"" . The underlying problem here is that you will not accept Van Inwagen's definition of meta-ontology in terms of the Carnap-Quine arguments over whether ontology is an empty subject. For some reason you feel that even when this is the topic, if the word meta-ontology is not explicitly stated, the subject is not what Van Inwagen was talking about. That is simply a misconcpetion on your part, and for example, Schaffer's paper is all about these very issues, even though the word 'meta'-ontology does not arise, and he uses the much broader term metaphysics, mainly because he wants to emphasize the connections to Aristotle. By the way, Aristotle didn't use the words 'ontology' or 'meta-ontolgy' either. " | 0 |
I didn't find it through searches in LexisNexis or the Wilson Combined Index (Articles First, etc.) | 0 |
"
I'm not going against the Oxford Dictionary. 'Fighting' means 'fighting' with arms. Protesters 'protest against' a government, they do not 'fight' it. Fighting implies violence to a native English speaker. I can imagine a non-native speaker coming to the conclusion you did, but insurgency always means 'armed'. — ☎ " | 0 |
Lets go with google books:
500 Days: The War in Eastern Europe, 1944-1945 - By Sean M. Mcateer, p. 184 This Battle of Tali-Ihantala probably convinced Stalin that conquering Finland was not worth the cost.
Finland at War 1939-45 - By Philip Jowett, Philip S. Jowett, Brent Snodgrass, p. 13-15 Had the Soviet 21st Army been victorious it could have continued north to take Helsinki, and whole of the Finland would have been occupied. The Finnish victory here... (under entry Battle of Tali-Ihantala)
Just couple of examples for starters, and no one has even started adding Finnish books to the list. If this (attribution) is insisted it should be realized that it will not improve the article in any manner, only convolute it. - | 0 |
My goodness it's become a hideous mess. | 0 |
That’s quite alright. Thanks. Please excuse my blunt style of argument — it is a reäction to others’ attitudes and nothing personally against you. Where practical and grammatical, it would of course be better to avoid such points of conflict (both the disagreements over “campi” and “preëmptively” were resolved by avoiding the plural, and opting for a compromise spelling (“pre-emptively” instead of the “preemptively” / “preëmptively” dichotomy), respectively). Thank you for your civility. | 0 |
Commercial means they make a profit dummy. 214.13.192.187 | 0 |
Removal of links on instances of name TONY LUKE in Dominator_(Comics) page
I post this here as I ran out of space in explanation field on edit page. Sorry ahead of time if this is not the proper place to post this.
Tony Luke, Jr., food media personality and Cheese-steak chef is not the correct Tony Luke that should be linked to in this article. The correct creator is Tony Luke, UK based comics artist and director of animation and music videos. He can be found at following links:
https://www.facebook.com/tony.luke.794
http://tonyluke.deviantart.com/
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVzSXQigXLw1rYYHnYAPztw?spfreload=10
https://www.lambiek.net/artists/l/luke-tony.htm
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0135991/
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm6032566/ | 0 |
Wording and Clarification, + lack of source
I have two changes that I suggest for the article:
'Parapsychology involves research that does not rely upon scientific modeling'.
This is an unsourced statement, and is a fairly bold statement to make. Whilst it may be true, I would suggest a source be found with examples of said methodological flaws, otherwise it should be removed.
'Critics such as Ray Hyman suggest that parapsychology has no methodological flaws that can explain apparently the successful experimental results that parapsychologists attribute to paranormal explanations, and various critics have classed the field as pseudoscience.'
Now this seems to be intended to be against parapsychology, yet the passage reads that there are no methodological flaws that can explain the results. Given that most attacks on parapsychology are aimed at exposing results as fake or due to methodological issues, this doesn't make sense.
Additionally, 'apparently the successful experimental results' does not read well. If this is intended to be a criticism, then perhaps it should be phrased 'the apparently successful experimental results'.
Finally 'various critics have classed the field as pseudoscience'. I do not have as much of an issue with this, yet the sources given include Hyman and Wiseman, both noted skeptics. Whilst their credentials are solid, the later part of the section names them as independent researchers, which is open to debate given their a priori stance that psychic phenomena do not exist.
Thank you, | 0 |
"
A cookie for you!
Thanks for that OTRS text approval template on Talk:Universidad Empresarial de Costa Rica. Frankly, I didn't even know there was such a thingy! " | 0 |
cool, I want to leave the link here so I can use it to store stuff while I digitize it. | 0 |
"
Well, he did right by removing it as it points finger towards you. But, let it go as the article is well-written and meets all GA criteria. So, it's fine to have a small review. Add, what I said and leave the way it is. Cheers!—Prashant " | 0 |
Also Halliwell's Who's Who in the Movies (2006 edition) says 1951. | 0 |
Fine by me, there's no rush. Just let me know when you're ready to rock and roll. Fatuorum | 0 |
"
I think I see your concern now. You're interested in the histories of the ""Tai Chi Chuan"" page and the corresponding discussion page. In that case, you need to go to the Tai chi chuan page, which will redirect you to ""T'ai Chi Ch'uan"". Just under the title you will then find a link saying ""(Redirected from ...)"". Click on the link to go to the former Tai chi chuan page, then you can view the histories of both that page and corresponding discussion page. I hope that clears that up for you. " | 0 |
I guess you admins have to look at the big picture. I respect that. Do what you consider best. Only consider if a properly formatted page is not a stub in its own right. - | 0 |
Well thank you for unblocking me. It was a typo when I referenced you on another board, and I was posting the message more in disbelief rather than a more trojan horse sort of way. But hey, thanks again. You should put your email up so people can contact you 17:42, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I'm just glad that this whole misunderstanding appears to be over with: I don't take much pleasure in having to block people. Of course, you have to admit that it was a very unfortunate typo. D – Soul 17:48, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC) | 0 |
Don't create article titles in all capital letters please. They don't conform to Wikipedia's naming system '''''' | 0 |
"
Agreed. It's original ""analysis,"" albeit flawed, akin to original research.
Producer credit
The primary producers on the film were Vachon, Koffler, and Wlodkowski. Jeremy Barber was listed as the sole producer, which is inaccurate and incorrect. Barber was one of three credited executive producers, which is a less important and more honorary credit than ""producer."" I have corrected accordingly. " | 0 |
"
How do you know? What did I do? And most importantly, why do things have to go your way? We were doing just fine doing it for the past two seasons, and now you want to take us back to the ""good-ole' days""? Stop living in 2007. Everybody hates the bottom 3 vagueness, and you are not helping matters. 76.107.17.32 " | 0 |
"
Nice guy vs jerk
Nice guys often come from a secular background, who are wrongly taught at home from an early age to respect the opposite sex and see her as equal in terms of intelligence and everything else. Jerks on the other hand come from semi-religious households (the extremes of abrahamic religions often) who by default see the opposite sex as inferior and in need of protection.
This makes sense when you think of the so called ""Girl-power"". Girl-power is completely useless on a jerk, a girl cannot hurt a jerk's feeling with her words and gestures because he's simply not thinking about what she says, but instead if the girl was to attack the jerk physically then he would in fact respond to it very violently. 84.241.20.45 Goshtaasp" | 0 |
Cross Country skills?
this is vandalism, right? i mean, the typo just tips it off.
- | 0 |
"
Edit warring at Al-Ahbash
(previously, he has used ), has removed edit-warring messages twice (here and here) from his talk page, constantly ignores and discredit all the peer-viewed sources provied by the other editors. He doesn't seem to be able to make up his mind:
Ahbash follows shafi madhab
Ahbash follows Ashari doctrine
Currently, he is engaged into edit-warring in the name of ""expansion"" without even getting consensus from the other editors who have been on that page for years. Please, looking into that. Thank you." | 0 |
"
Yes! you said: My username should be removed talk " | 0 |
Wikify Performance Task
I suggest someone better wikify the Performance Aliases section.
Ex:
Keith Matthew Thornton'' is his real name.Exxon''': He gave out cards at shows... | 0 |
I am afraid I am not going to change the flipflop redirect. For consistency, the best way is to have it point to flip-flop, whatever the topic of that page is. At the top of the article there is a link to the disambiguation page, which lists other meanings of the word - including the electronic circuit. Hope that makes the situation clear enough.
Sincerely, | 0 |
Hi Dr BW. An evidence base is what you're missing. Take care now. barleyscribs | 0 |
El_C didn't revert his page, which you would notice if you looked. He kept the bear. The user at the second page didn't revert, some other bozo did. Zscout370 did revert, and asked me not to, I agreed and we had a discussion, very civil. As for Louisiana, up yours. I got that from google news and more ridiculous things could happen. ASSUME GOOD FAITH. As for civility here, I refuse to be civil to people who aren't civil to me, simple fact. I would not many admins also use this policy. El_C and I have had a great relationship, ditto with Kim and Redwolf, why? Because they earned my respect by showing me respect. THAT is how it works. | 0 |
, and me being only a freshman | 0 |
"
{{unblock|As I said, I'm not Banzaiblitz. Blackguard also calls me a ""lone revisionist""; a simple search on the talk page will reveal that a consensus was reached earlier among 11 participants (with only 1 dissenter). Banzaiblitz (my brother) and CurtisNaito both pushed for an estimate within the 40,000-200,000 range. They were able to convince the others that that was the case. I also find it quite funny that me misspelling ""Banzaiblitz"" is used as evidence against me. " | 0 |
North Korea Nuclear Weapon Test
I can't help to notice that it was removed from the article, are we not going to add it, or shall we wait until information is absolutely solid? | 0 |
"
I don't know anything about the politics surrounding this, but unsubstantiated claims such as the one you describe don't belong in the article. I'm glad we seem to agree on this.
Not a new user, by the way. [talk|contribs] " | 0 |
Sounds like a much better reason to get rid of it than your last. I concur. | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.