text stringlengths 1 29.3k ⌀ | label float64 0 1 |
|---|---|
"
Controversial Demeanor Image
The photo I have added to the ""Controversial Demeanor"" section is a genuine photograph of Supervisor Daly, is used with proper permission, and is a 100% accurate depiction of the exact ""Controversial Demeanor"" that this section is about. Do not removed this imagine again without discussing on this talk page and showing proper justification for it's removal as well as a consensus from the other wiki editors of this article. " | 0 |
"
Your move of Philippe, Duke of Brabant to Philippe of Belgium breaks all Wikpedia rules. Crown princes are entered using their title, never their country if they have a title. And they are never ever put as of . That form is exclusively reserved for monarchs. In addition moves are never done that way. Please follow the Wikipedia:Naming conventions (names and titles) like everyone else. I've reverted the move. \(caint) " | 0 |
00:29, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC) | 0 |
It takes a lot of gall for you to massively expand this article and then complain that it's gotten too long. In any case, it is way too long and desperately needs to be trimmed back to a reasonable size. | 0 |
"
Hi RamonaKole, and Please excuse this intrusion as you have been around a bit already but if no one has said it before: Welcome to Wikipedia!
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Table of Contents
Department directory
Need help?
Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
How you can help:
Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.
Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.
Additional tips...
Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your ""signature"" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
Good luck, and have fun. FWIW, ." | 0 |
I agree w00t!?! intelligent inclusionism FTW!!! | 0 |
"
loudspeakers
Hi.
A reliable source has been added on London Muslim Centre. '''''' talk " | 0 |
What is it with Manchester? -) | talk . | 0 |
Thank you! -D t c e | 0 |
Edit reversion on 'Food for Fighters'
If you didn't notice, as you keep reverting it, I'm cleaning up the vandalism on [for Fighters], where someone has added in sexual references that are not present in the film, as well as an insult to US soldiers. Your reverts are reverting the page to its vandalised state! | 0 |
Some more
SnowspinnerTABOh. Hi Irate. Didn't see you in there.
=-=TABMode #wikipedia +o Snowspinner by ChanServ
=-=TABMode #wikipedia +b *!*Irate@217.44.39.* by Snowspinner
=-=TABYOU (Irate) have been booted from #wikipedia by Snowspinner (Snowspinner) | 0 |
"
Its WWE's official website what more do you want? The event's not called WrestleMania XXV, hence why its not on the logo. It's either called ""25th Anniversary of WrestleMania"" or ""WrestleMania 25"". Surely that's not difficult to see. " | 0 |
Hmm... Not really sure what all you are asking. Geomorphology is the study of landforms. Structural geology is the study of structures (folds, faults, etc) within the rocks at scales varying from microscopic to continental. Now of course they are interrelated. Essentially, landforms are the product of erosive processes on the existing structure of the rocks involved and cannot be understood or explained without a good understanding of the geologic structure of the rocks. A geologist trying to decipher the structural geology of a region begins by studying the clues in the landforms. All is related. Now, there is a tendency of some geographers to think that geomorphology is a subdivision of geography and try to explain landforms without a thorough understanding of the structure, petrology, and stratigraphy on which the surface landforms develop. Landforms cannot be understood without knowledge of the geology on which they are formed.
Now, after all that, both articles are in need of improvement - as are most Wiki articles. So - someday someone will work 'em over (hopefully for improvement) and maybe I will (just don't hold your breath -)
I don't really see the need for a category link from one category to the other as you have done - if we follow that to its logical end all categories would have to have links to all others as they are all inter-related. And that is an absurd proposition. Both are subcategories of Category:Geology aren't they?
Rambled enough for now. | 0 |
For Husky
Please stop trying to dictate what can and can not be on my own talk page. It is my talk page and nothing I have added or removed violates any rules at WP. Take your gustapo tactics elsewhere please. Thank you! | 0 |
You posted the notices about 30 hours ago ... perhaps people will trickle in. And yes, the protection expired about 5.5 hours before your post, so the tag should be removed. If the notices you posted do not produce an inflow of new participants, perhaps you might consider adding to solicit comments. Then again, that creates the possibility that the presence of the tag itself may become the subject of an edit war. ;) — '''''' (Talk) | 0 |
" (UTC)
The planes are not built of cardboard or glue and a quote from ""one woman"" is hardly evidence 18:03, 16 February 2007" | 0 |
"
Read very closely .
Per WP:VERIFY and WP:BURDEN, the burden of proof that the image shows Godane has already been proven through the many, upon many reliable and reputable sources. You seem to have an issue with this, therefore the onus has now been transferred to you in order to prove to the contrary, something which you have so far failed to do.
None of the sources you have cited have explicitly denied the authenticity of the image. They have merely used a different image of Godane. This does not support your contention that the image which is being discussed here, which is used by sources more reliable and reputable (e.g United States State Department , BBC and Reuters, among others) against the sources which you have cited, of which I have not heard of any one of them ( 'Suna times' and 'Waamo news').
No, there are not ""multiple images on Godane"", there are only two: The one being discussed here, and the one you consistently regurgitate. Yes, it won't make the other various portraits vanish. This still dose't help you, becuase through the above sources, it is seen which image is clearly favored by the more reliable sources. This source here, is the only thing that you have showed me which highlights that the image may not be Godane. I bet you're smiling and clapping your hands right now that through this magical source you have proven the image is not Godane, right? WRONG. This source is meager. It is unreliable as it is questionable. The article is a blog, unworthy of proper accreditation, and it's riddled with spelling errors and grammatical errors, e.g (""Hammami is still advocating for Robow’s troopss."") Are you kidding me? The author can't even spell, and you're taking this blog over acclaimed sources such as Reuters or the U.S State Department. Wow is all I can say. Furthermore, the blog doesn't identity which picture is incorrect (If indeed any image is incorrect, the author never cites his source), and the article was published over a year before those media sources cited above circulated the image being discussed here. Moreover, even if the images were used prior, it still doesn't help, as the author hasn't established where he got his information from concerning this supposed 'incorrect' image of Godane. Again, you're going to have to do more digging than that in order to prove your point.
The basis that 'foreign media agencies' have no credibility on reporting in areas where local media is present is just well, stupid. By that logic, any material/information coming from any part of the world which is not from the United States, the United Kingdom or Europe already excludes many of those sources. This geographical argument is meaningless. Ok then, how about I remove all references to BBC,Reuters, Council on Foreign Relations, Brookings Institution, Associated Press, Agence France-Presse, the National Counterterrorism Center (Oh look, they use the image as well! ) and many, many more sources just becuase they are reporting from places where they are not 'based'? Hmm? Seems reasonable logical to me, if we were to follow your logic. What you are forgetting is that each news agency, no matter if its western gets its information from local sources from the places where they are covering a story or reporting from, whether that's Somalia or Timbuktu. This source for example from BBC is from the BBC African branch, BBC Africa. They will have reporters, correspondents, sources, all across Africa. And this is only one media source. The Somalian media are going to be no more accurate than BBC Africa , as they will not have the extensive resources that the BBC have, even in Somalia but also elsewhere.
And finally, this. ""the various portraits can perhaps go in the body as StantheMan87 suggested "" -. So now you're willing to compromise? Ahh, I see! So when you find yourself in between an undeniable rock and a hard place when it comes to your POV, you finally are willing to take a compromise that was offered to you by , which you rejected? ""We can't do that"" -. was way to conciliatory towards you by even offering you a choice: ""What you believe should happen to the image is now up to you."" - . I'm afraid that I'm not as conciliatory, | 0 |
Dude, there's no evidence at all that Wesker survived. His head was blown off and his body was blown to pieces and he sank into lava. Stop being fanboys. Speculation will be reverted. | 0 |
Thanks for the explanation! | 0 |
Role - Play - Games RPG Trap
role playing games trap that is the defenition of rpg trap key word on google Yahoo Lycos alls search engines the reason we came up with that name we want all Gamers to go to one place and like a mouse TRAP RPG TRAP hours of fun. We love Role Play Games see us at http://rpgtrap.com
( ) | 0 |
Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Mohetjata. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. | 0 |
"
Mis-quoted text, possibly propaganda?
""In 2006, the United Nations mounted a covert operation to capture or kill Joseph Kony. A squad of U.S.-trained Guatemalan Special Ops soldiers set out into Congo's Garamba National Park, a longtime LRA refuge and the scene of the 2008–2009 Garamba offensive. Trained in jungle warfare and accustomed to surviving in the bush for long stretches, the Guatemalans were equipped with M-16s and the latest special-operations technology. Five LRA soldiers were killed and none of the Special Ops soldiers survived. According to one account, the commander of the Special Ops soldiers was beheaded. The battle, which lasted for several hours, included hand to hand combat. Reports put the U.N. dead at eight to forty. The LRA left the corpses in the jungle but took the weapons—including heavy machine guns and grenade launchers.[69]""
I removed this from the article (someone else saw that this was there, but no one deleted it). The source doesn't say anything about Guatemalan troops, or mention the battle. It's a series of six pictures with stories from individuals who were in some way affected by the LRA, but not even the word ""Guatemalan"" is present. Much less a description of a battle.
It read to me like it was propaganda. I guess its possible that the LRA has the internet too." | 0 |
"
I'd like to point out that the bad language in the first one has been corrected (see above), and mentioning the same diff two times doesn't generally make it twice as bad,.... but actually that is a popular strategy, and this is wikipedia, so hey, maybe I'm wrong there, th remainder appear to be dictionary definitions. ☏ 20:42, 21 Jun 2012 (UTC)" | 0 |
"==link removal==
I will remove the wierd link: ""A pregnant goldfish, according to a (false) urban legend"" " | 0 |
"I believe the translation of the sentence ""Gott ließ uns fallen, und so stürzen wir denn auf ihn zu."" is possibly inaccurate because perhaps the author translated the separable verb ""zustürzen"" as the simple verb stürzen.
In my German-English dictionary:
Stürzen = ""to fall"" or ""to crash""
Zustürzen = ""rush up to""
But if Dürrenmatt was writing in a Swiss-German dialect (which I know almost nothing about other than that German-speakers sometimes have difficulty understanding Swiss German-speakers), these words could have different meanings, and I could be completely wrong.
I think a better translation would be:
God lets us fall; and so then we rush back to him.
" | 0 |
"
Titles
Me again!
Friendly reminder: TITLES: album, film, book, etc. are always ITALICIZED.../ song, chapter, are in ""quotation marks"".....per:
Wikipedia:Manual of Style (titles)
Please check it out. ~ " | 0 |
"
Nice try, but no. That's a misapplication of the section of the WP:BLP policy you've quoted, and a distortion of my statements. It's in the cases where an article or biography of a person has been created that the WP:BLP People who are relatively unknown comes into play. If you think any article violates that policy, please give me the specifics immediately so it can be addressed. In the meantime, I suggest you concentrate on finding consensus for a list of alumni to be added to the article, and not continue to focus on whether each one of them has to have their own article to be included in that list- that's the point I was making. † " | 0 |
"
To all Wikipedia Editors of the Jehovah's Witnesses pages:
FOR THE RECORD: I have chosen to not respond directly to Central's continued personal attacks on myself as that is quite obviously a pointless exercise in futility. Nevertheless, I felt an explanation might be in order for anyone else contributing to these pages. As Central is fond of pointing out ad hominem arguments are generally a logical fallacy. By the same reasoning anything he says about me is quite frankly irrelevant to the real issue, which is what should be included in the Critical of the Group section. This has been discussed at length above. And, although we clearly we're not able to reach a unanimous agreement on the content, we did attain a majority consensus from those of the current contributors to this page that cared to express an opinion regarding what this section should and should not contain. Anyone that is curious can read the above thread whichas has observedis ""quite prolonged"". That being said, I welcome any and all reasonable dialogue on the subject. But as long as Central continues his personal attacks on my character I will continue to undo his reverts without further comment.
" | 0 |
You sure you don't see me floating on an air mattress here? Because I've transferred to my beach house located in the place you see in the image on the right. | 0 |
"
What is ""visually pleasing"" should never influence accuracy or completeness of information. As for ""reputable"" documentation that Geltrude Righetti was a contralto, see . As I pointed out on Talk:La Cenerentola, the role tables used by the Opera Project reflect the original voice type for which the role was written, as well as the most common voice type currently used for the role, if they differ. Please stop repeatedly making these misleading changes, both here to La Cenerentola. You are also invited to take this issue to the Opera Project discussion page. " | 0 |
This proposal leads to pure WP:OR. We categorize currently into very simple generic classifications based upon the quote. Alex' proposal is impossible, since, first of all we'd need to synthesize the scientists opinion, and the categories are simply contradictory between A&B;, climate sensitivity are just as important for solar, internal and cosmic rays, without a different approach to sensitivity none of the alternatives hold water. And furthermore Alex is assuming that the scientists view are internally consistent (ie. takes all data into account and explains them), which certainly isn't the case with several of the views that we have on the list. It could have been internally consistent for minority view, but won't be for tiny minority to fringe ones. | 0 |
DYK nomination of Steven Clarke (Canadian football)
Hello! Your submission of Steven Clarke (Canadian football) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — | 0 |
"
The best way to avoid a situation like this IMO is to just avoid ever changing or removing a talk page comment for the second time. There is virtually no situation where it is necessary to do so... and the few exceptions are severe enough to require admin attention. juicetalk " | 0 |
Racial segregation
I can't respond to your comment at Talk:Racial segregation because the page has been semi-protected, but to answer your question: start an RfC. Hopefully, it will attract some previously uninvolved editors to evaluate the sources and make comments from new perspectives. Good luck. 2601:14C:0:F6E9:71B2:6F01:9EB8:B237 | 0 |
"
Thank you, Becksguy. Like I mentioned in my edit notes, the reason I started this was because this had recently occurred in my own extended family. And like I've told others about it, ""I learned a new word that I really didn't want to learn."" Your expert expansion is deeply appreciated. " | 0 |
"
Thanks for adding the OptIn code, X!, and so quickly. To be honest I was afraid you would simply abandon the tool in frustration. Soap— " | 0 |
"
A barnstar for you!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar you're my hero! " | 0 |
( please give me a postal address where I can make a formal complaint about the behaviour on the David Ross entry.( ) | 0 |
I'm pretty sure I'm still blocked. Would you mind expalaining what is going on? And Tawker, are you allowed to just block someone even though they didn't do anything? Its like that Bob Dylan song, Hurricane. | 0 |
Come and Hear
JFW removed the link but I think this warrants a bit more discussion. Despite it being an anti-Jewish website, unfortunately THIS particular website also happens to be an important resource, as I'm not aware of any other site of the net that has parts of the Talmud online (yes there's Rodkinson but I think his version is spurious and anyway, the tractates are quite different in the two resources). Wikipedia pages have links to POV websites all the time, including very biased or deplorable ones. I think that it should be put back in, while it's the only site with a large proportion of Soncino in English online. Counterarguments shall be much appreciated. 11:48, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC) | 0 |
NSFS
NSFS or nordic stage fight society needs a link on exsternal | 0 |
text moved here from Fort Wayne, Indiana
The following text was moved here from the main Fort Wayne article because it is not about Fort Wayne. -
WOWO was one of the original Westinghouse stations, a 50,000 watt clear channel AM station heard all over the eastern seaboard. In 1992 Hurricane Andrew knocked off many radio stations in South Florida and WOWO was one of the stations Floridians could hear updated news of the Hurricane. WOWO was also well known in the 70's and 80's for it's extensive Indiana sports, agriculture and weather coverage. In the mid 1990's the signal was downgraded to 9,200 watts allowing station WLIB New York extend it's coverage. WOWO and WLIB share the same frequency and WOWO's dominant 50,000 watt signal prevented WLIB from extending it's coverage without a downgrade of WOWO's grandfathered signal. | 0 |
"
@Roboskiye: we deal in facts here, not personal accusations and attacks. Please state why your edit is justified and why the other editors' edits were unjustified, citing appropriate sources. (t • c) " | 0 |
I just meant that it seems like an official enough source of casting news. The date is of course open to question. | 0 |
"I see you are replacing facts with your conjecture. I will continue to replace what you write with facts. Note that this section is about conflict, and conflicts involve both sides. If we are to discuss conflicts between Danes and Muslims and claim that Muslims have a hard time assimilating, it must be mentioned that Danes also have no assimilated in the U.S. They have not assimilated in Patagonia, but this is not well documented, so I do not post this in the article.
Please allow for a complex discussion of all areas of immigration, including some that may make Danes look intolerant. What you continue to post is biased towards the notion that Muslims are particularly problematic when integrating into society. What I am presenting, with citations from Harvard and the University of Chicago, demonstrated that Danes and other Scandinavians did not integrate into American society.
I am really getting annoyed to see my facts replaced with some third-grade ""book report"" level of academic work. You should probably post your opinions on a blog or Conservapedia. Wikipedia is for scholarly work, which isn't biased towards the left, right, Muslims, or Christians.
" | 0 |
(talk) / (contribs) | 0 |
And why do I care about GameFAQ? | 0 |
Well PKtm, I am perfectly willing to have a civil discussion on it as I feel we are doing. All of my past reverts have contained this information from Lostpedia. The information is not solely from that site, it is also from this one. I have created a solution to this discussion. The wonderful thing about Wikipedia is that these changes can always be removed if a concensus is not reached. As the current concensus is at a stalemate I have taken the appropriate actions. I am in discussions with regards to the possible copyright infringement, but seeing as Lostpedia currently has no copyright guidelines, I agree this may take some time. I apologise if you feel that this solution is creating more problems but it was not my intention to create them. However, I feel that my creation of this new page is an amecable solution with regards to both points of the current discussion - | 0 |
(UTC)
On this subject, didn't the timeskip group image have the names in English a while back? What's with it being changed? - 02:02, 1 January 2008 | 0 |
''' on your user page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! | 0 |
new article: René Moncada
Hi there Mabdul, thanks for your recent assistance cleaning up my I AM THE BEST ARTIST Rene revision; long-time-no-see! I've just gone public with the related new article René Moncada and I'd like to ask for your help: I will next submit it to DYK, and knowing what I went through for the initial IATBA article I may need some support backing the nomination! At your convenience please do check it out and help keep an eye on it? Thanks friend! | 0 |
"
Diffusion Pharmaceuticals
Hi, I've removed ""LLC"" from the title of your new article about this company per Wikipedia's relevant naming conventions. I've also done other dastardly things to it (see the edit summaries). ''''''87 " | 0 |
No problem. -) Iamunknown | 0 |
Fixed, but now its redundant I guess, it have a mention of the work award three times in one sentence. | 0 |
Nguyễn Dynasty
Stop massive removing on the page Nguyễn Dynasty. You blanked too much others' edits. | 0 |
"
This issue clearly has not been resolved since still contains copyrighted images. The images are not entirely yours to release, since they contain artwork done by living people, and either they or the people they work for own the rights to those images. Who took the photo is to a certain extent irrelevant. Some of these photos would be allowed in an article if they are used in order to illustrate the subject of the photo, and are used for educational purposes. Fair use images may not be used in userspace. (talk) " | 0 |
The Best Man
A film released in a presidential election year about a fictional presidential election is related to the actual presidential election. How could WP:OR apply to a See also section? It's just links. 96.255.252.189 | 0 |
Thank you for the notification, Ronz. | 0 |
Website
Hello. http://lib.jxtcmi.com/
Is that site okay? | 0 |
plz explain reasoning i dun understand at all y i cud possibly be blockd???!!?? wut did i do wrong>?? ( hmmm =\ i dun get it. TONNY! unblock plz now. thx. a bunch. -aznphattymanstuart | 0 |
"
Thank you J very informative and I will keep those in mind. Although I know the last one applies to me, I'm just having difficulty understanding your third bullet point, would you be able to clarify? Anma I highly advise you follow the first two points as you have unessecarily remove references, then deleted the page in the name of no references, thus I reposted. I'm assuming that was meant by ""baiting"". Second at no time did we ever reach consensus as you just came in and removed things instead of working with me to get this right. J thank you for your professionalism and take the time to give your 2 cents, I hoist a goblet to your name." | 0 |
Removed Redirect
I removed the redirect of the Sinless perfection page to Christian perfection as it was a term that early Methodist didn't use.
07:02, February 28 2007 (UTC) | 0 |
"
OK, that's good enough for me - two of the three major participants like it, and the only argument against is a 4% difference in Google popularity, which may be misleadingly large for two reasons. In addition many Wikipedia pages already point to ""field of fractions"" and get redirected. I'll make the move. — " | 0 |
Not Prince
Yakub Alemsah is not sourced as a prince...he isnt a prince...
i look this sources there in turkish and they is abosutly not of talking this person | 0 |
I can see the reasoning to split, but there have been two schools of thought about this for comics. Obviously Green Lantern or Robin are examples of a superhero name taken by several individuals, but the standard seems to be to create a 'main' article about the character name/legacy and give some details about each. If more detail is needed/warrented, provide a link to the 'main article'. Obviously this is also affected by the significance of the character. Starman (comics) for instance gives descriptions of all of the many characters with that name, but only re-links to those individuals who have been notable using that psuedonym. For Shadowhawk it seems as if the mantle of this character was passed cleanly from one person to another, so I'd say keep it all in one article as with articles such as Phantom Lady or Black Canary. | 0 |
I have recently written a history of MRI article for the journal Neurosurgical Focus and provide a link to the Nature Precedings version. I believe that it fairly placed Damadian's specific contributions in their appropriate historical context. It also explores the difficulty of knowing how invention and priority are based.[ } | 0 |
WAT
Ooooh, I'll be blocked! IMAGINE THAT!! Why, it would be the end of the world, wouldn't it?
As if I can't get a new IP in seconds. | 0 |
"
""This is the umpteenth viewdelee proposal we've had lately""
At WP:VPR? - Dank (push to talk) " | 0 |
1) Agree with Arnoutf on research: The section right now is named Education and research and with more than half of the content it covers student exchange. This is not Economy, very simple. There is also no reason to split the section 2) A section named Single Currency is not possible because there is no single currency, there are 15 ! 3) Competition is important, correct! Therefore it fits perfectly in an introduction of Economy or even in Single market. Note that this article has overlength size. | 0 |
"Sunny Came Home]]""
|Shawn Colvin
|Soft Rock
|-
|""[[Time is on My Side" | 0 |
Oops. RsAzevedo msg | 0 |
Good observation. But the bot is not smart enough to detect when a template has the cat already, so it puts it in always. I'd think there is no harm to have the category show up twice (and most templates do not have the category I think). | 0 |
Text excised from 2-satisfiability
This description of the algorithm was included on the page on 2SAT, but was irrelevant there.
I'll paste it here so bits of it could be integrated into this article if required.
Kosaraju's algorithm performs two depth first searches, but is very simple: the first search is used only to order the vertices, in the reverse of a postorder depth-first traversal. Then, the second pass of the algorithm loops through the vertices in this order, and for each vertex that has not already been assigned to a component, it performs a depth-first search of the transpose graph starting from that vertex, backtracking when the search reaches a previously assigned vertices; the unsassigned vertices reached by this search form a new component. | 0 |
"
Yes, there just was:
Error: twinklefluffForceOpenUserTalkPageInNewWindow is not defined
Source File: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AAzaToth/twinklefluff.js&action;=raw&ctype;=text/javascript&dontcountme;=s
Line: 447
— Talk Contrib " | 0 |
"
Again, no. Look at the source where you will see Franklin Roosevelt's bookplate made without a motto. Motto's are not part of a blazon, a blazon is a description of a coat of arms, and a motto is not part of the coat of arms, but are external embellishments often added. And the arms were not awarded, where did you get that notion? Read the source, okay? And maybe this would make more sense to you. [tk] " | 0 |
Trying to prevent deletion of images
I noticed that three images I uploaded are on your CSD list. I am truly struggling to get through the procedure of image use, it seems very cumbersome to me as a relatively uninitiated user. When I try to find out what I need to do to save or justify the use of an image, I seem to keep finding explanations that lead to other explanations, requirements with other prerequisite requirements, etc. I suspect it isn't all that hard to the expert, but I am not an expert. The images in question are the three images linked from Charleston furniture warehouse fire, they are , and . I have explicit permission from the owner of the photos to use them on Wikipedia only. What else can I do to prove or justify their use? Help for this non-expert appreciated very much. | 0 |
dulita has a wonderfull background she is beutifull, talented and very very cool. | 0 |
Not 'involved', please. SV was the un blocking admin. Why the (possibly wrong)? Are we children. | 0 |
"The title of this page needs to be changed to Petascale Computing, and it needs to be more properly aligned under the supercomputing category. Most of the categories under supercomputing are actually objects, or theoretical ideas. This ""Petascale"" is a magnitude of the implementation of that technology with those ideals and therefore is dissimilar from the the other objects under supercomputing. This article might be served better to be a part of a new article under magnitudes of computing performance." | 0 |
Thanks John, I appreciate your thoughtful words. ) | 0 |
Relativity - correction
The effect of gravitational frequency shift on the GPS system due to general relativity is that a clock closer to a massive object will be slower than a clock farther away. Applied to the GPS system, the receivers are much closer to Earth than the satellites, causing the GPS clocks to be faster by a factor of 5×10^(-10), or about 45.9 μs/day. This gravitational frequency shift is also a noticeable effect.
There is a mistake. Yes, it is true, that the clock father away will be faster due to the weaker gravitional field. However, in case of orbiting satellites the effective gravitational field is completely canceled by the acceleration (remember totaly weightless astronauts in the orbit). According of the postulate of the general relativity theory an steady acceleration is equivalent to a homogenuos gravitational field - the satellite is in the effective zero-field.
Thus, the factor 45.9 μs/day must correspond to zero-field time dilatation, not somewhat-weaker-field time dilatation. | 0 |
Is there any chance that someone could add a mass transfer (general transport processes ) to the discussion. Just because the object to be dated is buried or not transport processes continue around the object. Is carbon-14 being leached out of the object at a faster rate or slower raten than the same process for nitrogen? Doesn't this have an effect on the ration of carbon-14 to nitrogen? | 0 |
"
The article says she won the ""primary portion of the Texas primary and caucuses, [293]"", which she did. " | 0 |
Where are you trying to get with this? You are not replying to my questions but you continue to block me from having a serious discussion | 0 |
"
Ya know, you keep coming up with this 'making statements without backing them up, but it is right there in black and white. Is that the best you've got?? My position on the Kidman pic is quite explicit and if you view my contribs you would see this. I figure you either have a hard time reading, or you just don't get it. I did like your contribution on the term ""pussy"" though. It seems you know your field and your concept of editing with content in the proper context does have its uses. Why don't you come up with something other than its 'informative' because I like to look at nude photos. " | 0 |
June 2007 (UTC)
I find this unacceptable that such POV-based users can fill an article with blatant spam and then be protected by moderators/admins
I provided a source and they wont except it but only accept their lies and vandalism, this is very disappointing that this site protects these kinds of users and denies lovers of honesty and TRUTH. 10:52, 6 | 0 |
"
Is this article going to FAC? '''' (cricket calendar poll!'') " | 0 |
"
First of all thank you for cleaning up my messages. I am new to this and have already learnt a lot from you (and about you:-)).
Second, I reverted to ""VAS is based on Budan's theorem"", but I still disagree with you. Here are the reasons why: A. Sturm himself said
""m'appuyant sur"" = ""by relying upon"" and not ""having been inspired by"". B. In Greek, ""to rely upon"" is βασίζομαι, and there you can see the word βάση which means base. I also leave it up to you to decide the wording for Sturm's method and Fourier's theorem. I simply cannot accept the word inspiration; reminds me of religion.
" | 0 |
":""Straighten up"" is an uncivil comment made by Wikipedia administrator pschemp.
" | 0 |
"
The problem with this disambig is, Michael, that it links to events in history that barely can be called a ""Polish invasion on Russia"" - for instance as there was no Russia in today meaning of the word - and they show rather a Russian (Ghirlandajo's?) POV. Without any disclamer (term used in Russian historiography) a reader can think we claim that they were ""Polish invasions on Russia"" what is not exactly my view. ) That's the main problem and Ghirlandajo's insults and his weak explanations afterwards that he was understood wrongly (yeah, right) only make finding a good solution more difficult. Best, δ " | 0 |
"
You could try reading WP:SOURCES (which will explain why someone's Twitter page is not considered a ""reliable source""), WP:NOTPROMOTION and WP:COI. All these will help you understand better what is wrong with your article. There is nothing to stop you creating the article again, but you will have to follow the guidelines on notability to prevent it being deleted again. In particular, you need to find that substantial coverage in third-party sources to justify the inclusion of this person. I couldn't find anything much through Google, just a lot of promotional material and a few mentions in non-notable blogs. Also, if you decide to start again, make sure to avoid phrases such as ""Her style carries an endearing child-like quality"" unless it is a direct quotation from a third-party source. That kind of wording is considered non-neutral. " | 0 |
I am a random nobody but out of curiosity I read this article. It reads to me, the average man on the street, as a PR piece for Weight Watchers, there is nothing even slightly negative about the corporation in it. Any large entity has negative aspects to it, I am left with the assumption that the company wrote the article or paid people to keep negative material out of it. | 0 |
"
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Heart of Darkness. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " | 0 |
REDIRECT Talk:Gödel's incompleteness theorems/Archive01 | 0 |
Ha! Even the main Hunting Incident article has the Aaron Burr reference listed under triva. So, explain to me what trivia is doing in the Dick Cheney main page segment that is supposed to be succinct? There is no excuse for this, I'm removing it. | 0 |
Photos
Photos and/or photo uploads are needed.
HABS or HAER photos may be available for this site. Search HABS/HAER here
Some of NRHP photos linked in article are taken by NPS employee, hence public domain and can be used. Search NPS focus here for highest resolution JPG versions
NRHP photos seem not to be available on-line for this site.
New photos would be helpful. | 0 |
"{| class=""messagebox standard-talk""
|-
|
|On April 2, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Belmont Castle, England, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
|}
On April 8, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Aniceto Ortega, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
" | 0 |
Sorry about that, I thought it was still the G11 tag. Please feel free to replace the spam tag - I did advise the copyright holder that the article may still be deleted for that reason. babelfish | 0 |
"
Well, Nate, would you please just try to do one more of your great editions? I can understand that some people think they ""own"" certain articles, but I'm glad I'm not one of those. But you know the problem with saying that after Vortexx, ""no more Saturday morning cartoons exist on a major commercial broadcast network,"" is, right? That's to stand in the sunlight and say that ""the sun does not exist,"" because NBC Kids IS cartoons (all but one show), and it IS on Saturday mornings. So yeah, even though they're not great for older kids doesn't mean that ""Saturday morning cartoons 'isn't a thing' anymore."" But you shouldn't just assume that ""nobody else really cares,"" because you can't read everybody's mind.
I did, in fact, edit in good faith. I only said ""look at your ex-wife's friend's TV"" because it seemed pretty obvious that spshu is totally ignorant that such shows even exist there, as if he doesn't have his own TV service to just give it a look and prove it to himself.
Will you please come/go by and make one of those great ""'''''' • (chatter) Special"" edits at OMM just like you did at Vortexx (complete with indisputable sources that are either like, or the exact, ones already used in other articles that include NBC Kids and aren't being disputed)?
Thanks kindly,
75.162.179.246 " | 0 |
Comment, as nominator @Necrothesp and the other user, what criteria are you using for determining whether there is a primary topic? | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.