text stringlengths 1 29.3k ⌀ | label float64 0 1 |
|---|---|
R U aware
I read everything you post?
beckjord | 0 |
I am an academic at Curtin and monitor this page a bit. I am a little unhappy with the marketing hype in the section, Curtin Sarawak. While this campus is good, and the staff dedicated and it provides a good-quality education, the tone of the piece suggests it has been lifted out of an advertising brochure.... | 0 |
Luck=
This material is not appropriate for Wikipedia. If you think it has value, publish it in a blog. | 0 |
]]
Gutcruncher now at [[User:Mathewignash/Gutcruncher | 0 |
"
Do you have a diff for that? Corbett " | 0 |
" 2011 (UTC)
Nope, Cancer originated as an unspecified ""water animal"" in pre-Babylonian times (see Babylonian star catalogues#Zodiacal constellations). I prefer the doctors change the name of their disease to something like ""degenerative cell chaos"", the AL.LUL of the MUL.APIN star catalogue take precedence. dixit. (mbork3!) 09:16, 31 December" | 0 |
Special Category for British Motorcycles
As part of the Motorcycling WikProject I am working though all the missing articles and stubs for British Bikes. To make things easier to sort out there is a special category for British motorcycles. Please will you add to any British motorcycle pages you find or create. It will also help to keep things organised if you use the Template:Infobox Motorcycle or add it where it is missing. I've linked the Category to the Commons British Motorcycles so you could help with matching pics to articles or adding the missing images to the Commons. Thanks | 0 |
"
In addition, historian Bruce A. Elleman says- ""the boxers still wanted to overthrow the qing dynasty According to one poster from early 1900, the “chief offender” for China's problems was the Manchu Emperor.""" | 0 |
Editing roller derby articles
Hey, I thought I'd give you some tips on editing roller derby articles. Excellent work so far.
Put as many references to national news sources as possibleRoller Derby And Ice Hockey Together At Last!Derby does Dallas . Click edit on this page, and you'll see how I did these example references.
Start editing other wikipedia articles, in addition to DDD. There are some funny rules onhere, and the more you edit different pages, the more you'll know what they are, and then the better you can contribute to pages like the DDD page.
References | 0 |
"
United Nations (jk)
I wonder how long it will take for the proxy that i am using to get removed? you see... i am a troll, and i have been clicking random article and doing ""minor spelling corrections"" editing only one word (usually a word that is linked to a page) and changing it to something funny (example- changing fish to shark). And since i am only editing one word, it bypasses the vandalism filters. hahahaha so go ahead and block me, see if i care because i will just find a new proxy and keep doing it. i enjoy making work for reviewers and admin." | 0 |
, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
And no, we do not all accept that random users who have sought or accepted the power should be able to override other users edits, this case being a good example of why. My non-cooperation with wiki beauracracy is deliberate, conscious, and a matter of conscience. The expected behaviour in wiki no matter what the worth of the material added is to incorporate what of it we can, not to wholesale revert. Your attitude is as much in question as my own, Mr V. 13:34 | 0 |
"
I think that it should be included as I had included, that's it, as part of Biafra (only during some time in 1967). What is not logic is to not include the Re. of Benin but put a Rep. of Benin flag next to Albert Okonkwo at the infobox. Or Rep. of Benin had to be included or the flag next to Albert Okonkwo had to be changed to a Biafra one. Also, Im gonna add ""citation needed"" to all the supposedly supporter countries with no sources. Regards, " | 0 |
Repetitive edits from Boeing registered IPs
Over the past couple of days, there have been repetitive biased edits made on this page from two different IP addresses registered with the Boeing corporation in Washington. I've reversed some of the blatant vandalism, and a couple of the edits have been neutral enough to not have to undo, but I'm afraid if I keep undoing these, I'll be blocked from editing. I'm relatively new to Wikipedia's procedures (but understand neutral editing), so I'm unsure exactly what action to take here. Seems like Boeing should revisit their internet usage policy? | 0 |
REDIRECT Talk:Jarosław of Bogoria and Skotnik | 0 |
"
Template talk:WikiProject Sociology
In case you are not watching...| talk " | 0 |
You make fair arguments about the content, so I've started a discussion for you here. There's no need to gain a consensus for removing it first, but explaining somewhere why you're removing it would have been the correct move. | 0 |
Thanks for the support.
Hi Bob,
Thank you very much for coming out in support of my RfA. I appreciate your support for my nomination – which ended successfully a few hours ago. I hope to retain your confidence as I serve the community.
Please feel free to contact me if you need help with an action requiring administrative access; I will do my best to be of assistance to you. Cheers, | 0 |
As I said, they need to be sourced. | 0 |
Hi, thanks for providing those pages so I have some typos to look for ;) Maybe if I start from the other end (and of course strike out things I've corrected), we'll avoid overlap? 08:47, 5 Apr 2004 (UTC) | 0 |
My plan failed? Oh, I don't think so. | 0 |
Conflict of interest complaint
Please note that a conflict of interest complaint has been filed concerning you here. | 0 |
Ah, something else to archive. | 0 |
", 18 November 2005 (UTC)
Come on, Panache, your attack is not good faith. I certainly do beleive that discrimination is a major factor in these riots. There are many serious sources stating this. Therefore I would certainly support putting something about ""discrimination"" in the opening sentence. 10:42" | 0 |
ticket prices
Tickets are $14 - $400. Just announced at this years season opener. So take it out of unknown elements | 0 |
, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Amazon.com is not a reference to a genre. Unless you can point to a real reference then do not put Prog Metal back in there. 98.224.211.86 20:57 | 0 |
Chinese/Japanese claims/theories
Please do not lured by Chinese/Japanese rightwingers trying to distort Korean culture, heritage and history. In fact they have been benefiting from taking credits from ancient Korea for long time. China/Japan is well-known for distorting history.Korsentry | 0 |
Please check the technology links at the end of the article independent peer
reviewed publications on the company's technolgy | 0 |
u take long time respond | 0 |
Talk main page
Hi, I'm not sure how long you've been hanging about talk main page, I seem to remember your sig. But do you remember Template:Main Page discussion header ? We used to have that on there, but people still placed help questions and etc on talk:main page. The general consensus recently was to just not have any warnings or help and just answer people's questions or direct them to where they should be, with out WP:BITEing them. No use in trying to hold back the tide it seems. People 'never' read instructions ;) | 0 |
Requested move 23 May 2014
:Ramona Lisa → – The current name, Ramona Lisa, is Carolina Polachek's musical alias and not her true birth name. The overall page about Caroline Polachek's musical career should be aptly titled with her real name, Caroline Polachek. A Caroline Polachek Wikipedia page does exist; however, it automatically reroutes to be the Ramona Lisa page when it should be the other way around. Ramona Lisa information should definitely be within Caroline Polachek's page but as a section or subsection rather than the title of the entire page.
Survey
Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
Discussion
Any additional comments: | 0 |
Are you? You keep erasing facts. | 0 |
I redirected your link to go directly to the DNB article. If this was not your intention please let me know. Thanks again! | 0 |
WikiProject History of Science newsletter Issue V - January 2009
It's here at long last! The January 2009 issue of the WikiProject History of Science newsletter is ready, with exciting news about Darwin Day 2009. Please feel free to make corrections or add news about any project-related content you've been working on. You're receiving this because you are a participant in the History of Science WikiProject. You may read the newsletter or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Yours in discourse | 0 |
Hazel Eye Myth==
The description of hazel eyes says they're green and brown (either colour could be dominant) and can also contain gold, this description is incorrect, true hazel eyes are a golden honey brown colour (basically light brown) which matches the colour of a golden brown hazelnut shell (hence the word hazel), however in some instances can contain minimal amounts of green (either on the outskirts and/or mixed in with the gold) when observed in direct/sun light, but green is by no means a requirement for true hazel eyes.
The myth of hazel eyes being green and brown or any multi-coloured eye is common in North America aswell as areas of the world that have been exposed to Americanisation, However in Europe (the origin of light eyes & hazelnuts) the correct meaning still exists and is used when identifying eye color (hazel eyes = golden light brown colour). The myth of hazel eyes being green and brown or any multi-coloured eye is likely to of started due to green and brown eyes turning a gold and/or light brown colour in areas of dim lighting and actual hazel eyes sometimes presenting slight green when observed in direct/sun light, but this is nonetheless an obvious misconception which requires common sense to understand.
As for green and brown eyes they're well green eyes that contain contain central heterochromia (brown around the pupil) but this does not change the fact of their true colour being the outer green, if you want to categorise them differently the name Forest Green proves worthy or just simply green eyes with brown.
Here are some examples of what true hazel eyes are;
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hazel_eye_of_a_mixed-ethnicity_female.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Amber_Brown_Green.jpg
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:S7307583.jpg#.7B.7Bint:filedesc.7D.7D
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:HumanFemalewithAmberIris.jpg
http://toponthelist.info/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/amber_eye.jpg
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mocuishle_photography/2340845990/sizes/l/in/photostream
Here are some sources backing up my statement;
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/hazel (defines it as a light golden brown colour, after a hazelnut)
http://www.wonderquest.com/eye-color-age.htm (states hazel eyes are light brown or yellowish brown)
http://www.fanteye.com/extimages/p_FreshlooksColorblendsChartLG.jpg (shows a pure hazel eye, big difference to the green eye diagonally below to the right)
http://www.colormecontacts.com/colored-contacts-for-dark-eyes (puts hazel eyes in the same category as honey, not green plus displays a green eye with abit of brown (central heterochromia) under the green category)
http://www.yestheyrefake.net/color_contacts_buy_photos.htm (shows hazel eyes in numerous pictures presenting them as a golden brown)
http://hazeleyes-wintergoddess.blogspot.com.au/2009/07/hazel-eyes.html (states the North American misconception and the true/original European definition while showing examples of various sources, numerous pictures and comments below of people agreeing and showing gratitude)
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_definition_of_Hazel_eyes (states the misconception and says that hazel eyes are supposed to match the hazel or cob nut, the fruit of the hazel bush/tree that grows in Europe)
http://m.rateitall.com/iPhone/item.aspx?p=0&ItemID;=1074601 (shows an optometrists opinion/experience with the issue while stating the North American hazel eye misconception and providing sources backing up his statement)
Hazel Eye Picture On The Right
The picture on the right hand side of the hazel eye section does not match the description of hazel eyes, as it is blue with central heterochromia (brown around the pupil). The hazel eye description says nothing about hazel eyes being blue in any way, so i trust this is a mistake that needs to be changed immediately, i propose one of the following pictures be shown in it's place as they match a golden light brown hazelnut colour:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hazel_eye_of_a_mixed-ethnicity_female.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Amber_Brown_Green.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:HumanFemalewithAmberIris.jpg
== | 0 |
I did mention something about a philanthropic body doing something similar. I agree that it is possible but, as I said, unlikely. Sometimes the unlikely happens. | 0 |
"
Hello
The image that you uploader needs your visit File:ArianaGrandeDecember2013.jpg. in the image says: ""This file may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion as an image, hosted on Commons, but with tags or information on its English Wikipedia description page that are no longer needed. See #F2.""
Can you fix it please?. Grande's article needs actual images as a File:ArianaGrandeDecember2013.jpg. Regards." | 0 |
Great, thank you! That helps to clarify. I am his assistant, actually. Here are two cites that show he is a NYT Best Seller: http://www.nytimes.com/best-sellers-books/2014-11-30/overview.html and http://www.nytimes.com/best-sellers-books/2012-06-17/combined-print-and-e-book-nonfiction/list.html 173.213.212.233 Daryn | 0 |
i find it inexplicable that i tried to edit an article on guy fawkes when originally i only intended to use wikipedia on finding some information on polycarbonate roofing - how the hell i ended up at Guy Fawkes is beyond me. I guess i became curious as to who it was that striking out a true fact and thats when i started reading various sources about parrot-of-doom, nev1 and webhamster all of whom somehwere i read where in fact one person whose name i recall was kurt adkins. As i said dont ask me why or how i got there but i did - i think it was displacement behaviour when in reality i should have been researching polycarbonate roofing however its is not the most exciting subject in the world hence why i was easily distracted. For the record i had to create an account in order to rectify the mistake in the guy fawkes article and write something about polycarbonate roofing (as the subject is not in wikipedia) the name that i choose was a composite of the names that had previously cropped in my research in wikipedia. | 0 |
June 2009
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. | 0 |
"
And then we have this:
Paul O'Connor, a laboratory technologist who assisted in the autopsy of President Kennedy, claimed that the autopsy at Bethesda Naval Hospital was conducted in obedience to a high command of admirals and generals. O'Connor stated:
There were kind of mysterious civilian people, in civilian clothes — were there [at Bethesda]. It seemed like they commanded a lot of respect and attention — sinister looking people. They would come up and look over my shoulder, or look over Dr. Boswell's shoulder, and run back, and they'd have a little conference in the corner. Then all at once the word would come down: ""Stop what you're doing and go on to the other procedure."" And that's the way it was all along. We just jumped back-and-forth, back-and-forth. There was no smooth flow of procedure at all.Turner, Nigel. The Men Who Killed Kennedy, Part 3, ""The Cover-Up"", 1991.
This doesn't seem like standard practice even for the military. " | 0 |
Aah, that explains why you left the above message instead of just emailing me. I had accidentally disabled email in the course of changing my email address. | 0 |
"
Here's the line from the article ""The theory of an older Sphinx has received significantly more support from mainstream science"". " | 0 |
"
:
Sandstein apparently thinks that everything not being a compliment is ipso facto derogatory. There is also another possibility that hasn't crossed his mind: neutral. No English dictionary has (derogatory) or (offensive) label next to the definition of the word nationalist. However, in Sandstein's native language the word nationalist does have a derogatory undertone. Here is the link to the definition of Nationalismus in the most authoritative German dictionary (Duden), where it has a label (meist abwertend) which translates into English as ""mostly pejoratively"". In German it's used as a pejorative, in English it isn't and it belongs to the neutral register. I suspect that Sandstein mixed two entirely different usage contexts for otherwise related words with the same meaning, in two different languages.
It was not my intention to make any kind of personal attack. If you look at my edit history you can see that my behavior has been nothing short of exemplary. I have never heard anyone complaining about being offended by calling them nationalist. More often than not, it is I who is on the receiving end of abuse which sometimes provokes abrasive responses. If someone said that they are offended I would've stopped.
Sandstein's condescending comment about me apparently failing to understand something (what?), justifying the ""educational"" component of the block by such lack of understanding is borderline insulting. Perhaps Sandstain trains his dog by taking punitive measures when puppy does something wrong, but may I remind him that we're dealing with human actors here that are not Fachidioten with blinders that only respond to Pavlovian stimuli dispensed by the master with his block^Wstick. An administrator should not be making such comments when blocking other users. They shouldn't probably be thinking of editors as offenders that ought to be subject to corrective measures (blocks) for their infractions (policy violations), but at least they could keep it to themselves.
OK, let's say I crossed the line with nationalist name-calling. I didn't mean to use derogatorily, but I can accept that it is not an appropriate conduct. But what does that have to do with ARBMAC and the excessively long block? As I far I can see the guidelines on the WP:PA require posting a message on user's talkpage and seeking mediation. None of that happened. PA is a community-approved policy which takes precedence over anything ArbCom decides, or any admin ""broadly interprets"". A week is something that trolls and bad-faith editors get. Surely it's too excessive?
This whole circus is a result of content dispute with the user who submitted the enforcement request. It was not made in good faith and his ulterior goal is to remove me from editing a set of low-importance articles that are currently not in a NPOV state. He also submitted a sockpuppet investigation against me with evidence such as last-year's sarcastic comment of mine on a sister project, as well as edits that I made years ago. With all that in mind, I must say that Wikipedia community has become very effective at giving partisan editors tools to target undesirable editors - a Byzantine collection of policies which admins overzealously enforce without a second thought, and without thinking of a big picture. Admins in fact are incentivized not to involve themselves, which basically gives the enforcement gun to POV-pushers which are intimately acquainted with all the glorious details of the relevant wikilese. I urge admins to think outside the policy-enforcing request-observing mode and think whether blocking me in any way helps to resolve the pending content disputes. " | 0 |
User:Leki threatened to ban me without giving any explanation as to why. he harassed me so i harassed him. that's the most uncivil thing i've done, i think, although in my defense, he started it. that's not much of a defense, tho, so i will apologize for that and next time someone wrongs me, by my thought, i'll contact an admin instead of taking measure into my own hand. sorry.
thank you for responding. | 0 |
make bad faith accusations and assumptions against | 0 |
What is going on here it is a High school , just because it is in Thuringowa you can't delete it....thsi is getting silly now.
this page has to be kept. | 0 |
"== 11 September attacks ==
Please stop. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:September 11, 2001 attacks, you will be blocked for vandalism. You may change your own comments, but stop removing the comments of others. Thanks!
Hello,
What comment are you refering to?
Well... a bunch of them. For instance:
You do understand that Wikipedia has thousands of articles about highly controversial topics? That's not a sufficient reason for deletion. (talk)
That one is removed,
(edit conflict, but pretty much agrees with above) The fourth reference is known as a secondary source, which is the kind of sources that wikipedia tries to cite. We take as little as possible from primary sources, and instead use secondary sources, verifiable secondary sources in fact. Google video is not a secondary source, nor is it a verifiable source, so any evidence gleaned from people's postings there is not permissible as evidence. Unless you can find any verifiable evidence that supports your reasoning, I'm gonna call on Occam's razor and say that the more simple explanation that fits the facts is true. Please stop trolling this page unless you have cold, hard, verifiable facts that support your thesis, as any further rants will be removed as trolling. Thank you.
That one is modified,
This is trolling. Can we please close this, since it is obvious that Gaby de wilde is either unintrested in accepting that the majority don't buy his/her conspiricy theory, or he/she is trolling. Either way, this is pointless. If he/she thinks this page has any hope of being deleted... I must provide a phone number to a local mental hospital.
That one is removed, and there are a bunch of others. So when you compress your own comments, please don't remove or change other people's, ok?
And how is this a valid reason to delete my post?
I honestly ask you: Did you even read it before you hit delete? I removed some postings that contained only accusations of trolling. Everything I wrote so far in wikipedia has been deleted!
THANK YOU EVERYONE!
So far I have not figured out what to do about this. If you read the post you deleted then you would know there is no link between Osama and 911.
Which means Officially there are no Muslim terrorists.
I'm not going to edit one more letter you see. I've been reverted into nothing more then enough now. All I want to know now is why you insist upon having lies like that on the wikipedia page.
You like the news media quoted as an authority over the FBI right?
At least share me your thoughts on the topic.
That's all I asked.
As you've deleted the option for everyone else to comment on my words you should at least answer the question yourself?
Or explain why it's unreasonable to ask?
Thanks.....( )
" | 0 |
VernoWhitney|talk]]) 00:42, 17 August 2010 | 0 |
"
Inputs for use. Proof that India had a license raj introduced by Nehru: quote from a paper by a Harvard professor at http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~drodrik/Growth%20volume/DeLong-India.pdf - ""This puts a bound on the growth-retarding effects of the ""license raj"" generated by prime minister Jawaharlal Nehru's attraction to Fabian socialism and central planning."" What do you have to say to this? Is this a massive conspiracy too? Are you going to abuse this professor now as you have been abusing anyone who has pointed out that Nehru's central planning resulted in India being backward?
One more from a paper presented at Yale: http://www.econ.yale.edu/seminars/NEUDC03/shahe.pdf - After decades of lackluster performance under the all pervasive interventionist policy regime espoused after independence (the so-called ‘License Raj’), India embarked on a major economic liberalization program in 1991, triggered by a severe balance of payments crisis.
Yet another paper from Harvard website - http://www.cid.harvard.edu/hiid/662.pdf - The pre-independence experience was combined with a very clear inspiration from the experience of the socialist countries, in particular the Soviet Union, which was reflected in the speeches of the Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru and in the now famous Mahalonobis model which had many similarities to the work of Feldman for the first Soviet Five year plan (see Domar (1957))11.
From another academic paper - http://www.ndu.edu/library/n4/n035604L.pdf - Remnants of Nehru’s command economy haunt virtually every aspect of India’s reform program. Even after twelve years of progress, more than 40% of the country’s capital base remains in government hands.10
-Economist" | 0 |
"
Translation
I have removed the (French: ""Little cross drive"") translation as utter rubbish, the actual translation would be more like: ""the walk (or drive) where the small roads meet/intersect"". Parley! " | 0 |
Kindness
Why do you consider my messages to you spam, when I am only trying to help you? Don't you read the text? 83.250.44.41 | 0 |
that I would stay indoors too. | 0 |
Although I am certainly devilish on occasion, I think you pinged the wrong name there. ) | 0 |
@97. No need for the snide remarks. St. John's is neither Duke, nor is it Harvard. It is at the level of Long Island University. It's graduation rates is not where Fordham is at, nor anywhere close to Duke or Harvard. 75% of Fordham students graduate in 4 years with a BA degree. For St. John's the number is 38%. Also a BA degree is also called a 4 year degree, thus people want to know the 4 year graduation rate. Not how long it takes someone to graduate with a 4 year degree in 6 years. 24.239.153.58 | 0 |
Book club started up
Hi,
You requested I message you after setuping up the book club.
You an now find the project home at WBC
Regards,
lots of issues | leave me a message 13:32, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC) | 0 |
new book
the blue tatoo is a book advertised in the new yorker 2009 from nebraska press and margot mifflin | 0 |
"
though your suggestion is appreciated, it's a bit presumptuous. I use the ""Shoe preview"" button ACTUALLY QUITE A BIT, overall, in articles. The problem, Nova, is that you think somehow that I was just birthed on WP from a cabbage truck, and no next to nothing about policy and options. I don't always use ""Show preview"", but I have used that option almost 50% of the time on articles. I never even wanted to be an editor on WP, it happened ACCIDENTALLY.....because all the 4 articles (not many) that I created on WP were articles I thought would be there already. And I was surprised they weren't. So I felt compelled to create them. Also, you notice that the number of articles I have edited on WP is only about 200 not even. Cuz again, I'm more into QUALITY THAN QUANTITY. And like everyone else on WP sometimes a person gets caught up. If I WANTED to be a big shot on WP, with many created articles, and thousands of edited articles, I could....but I DO NOT WANT TO. I don't really care that much. But anyway, the point about ""Show preview"" I do use, and quite a bit.... I know it may not seem that way cuz of all the edits per page (in general), but I (especially the last 2 or 3 months) have utilized ""Show preview"" lots... Your comment here presumptuously showed that you not only thought that I did not use ""Show preview"" ever, but also that I somehow was not even aware of it. ??????? I know, ma'am....and I do use it. thanks.... " | 0 |
"
I believe that is a misconception. Basically, there was a dispute with a claim about premodern Chinese GDP per capita, but the relevant claim was later removed. I fail to see any further disputes with the article, as the disputing editor has no interest or had ever edited this topic before he entered a content dispute with me and decided to ""edit"" articles I wrote on other topics. " | 0 |
"
It's for the display of in-line common and scientific names of living things, and emits the (draft) ""species"" microformat. I'll update the template documentation to clarify that. (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits " | 0 |
That sig I showed you
It uses up an entire kilobite!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | 0 |
"
Vandalism
Please stop vandalizing ""Natalee_Holloway"". This is your official warning. Another instance of vandalism will result in you not being able to edit pages.
Thank you, Wikipedia." | 0 |
I am concerned that Tbeatty keeps using comparisons involving Peter Roskam, a sitting Rep and member of the GOP (in good standing) and a convicted rapist and murderer. That's not kosher! That's kinda like when I get pissed off and start calling Bush 'Hitler'. I encourage TB to STOP these comparisons involving Peter Roskam, who by all accounts is a fine Christian man, and Willy Horton! If this continues I'm gonna have to go to BLP! If Tbeatty needs to compare Roskam and somebody else, I suggest he stick to other GOP politicians, not a convicted a rapist/murderer. (who never even held office)! I collegially suggest to my friend Tbeatty that he pick Tom Delay, Bob Ney, or Randy 'Duke' Cunningham for comparative purposes! (Willy Horton's probably a Dem anyway!) - | 0 |
Well, this chap isn't a sockpuppet of me, and I resent the outrageous accusation. You can enter that into the offical LOG. | 0 |
": Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by ""Añoranza"". The reason given for Añoranza's block is: ""3RR"". Your IP address is 88.73.92.206.
And" | 0 |
, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
Actually I remember now. It was actually the one on yoru user page that made me realse there was somethign wrong. Have a look at it. The way the colors are and such the white stones looks (though they are not) smaller than the black stones. It might be an optical effect of my monitor resolution but that was not a problem with the previous version. | Talk 06:23 | 0 |
"
The use of the word ""sister"" when referring to properties of the same entity
Using sister to refer to related properties is common usage. Why does it have to be gender neutral? This is common English. I suppose you will want to change the Mother Road to something else also. There is no need to change what is correct because of PC or something related. " | 0 |
. (I am the only one citing sources consistently) | 0 |
(edit: sorry forgot to sign) | 0 |
"
Many sources does not equal facts, see WP:WEIGHT and WP:WEASEL for example. There are many references in that table, yet few of them refer directly to Northern Ireland as being a country in its own right. None of them say that Northern Ireland is a ""contry"" in and of itself (as this articles currently seems to do) but rather in the limited sense of what a ""country"" can mean with regards to the UK constient parts.
That is an obscure use of the word. We are not here to confuse our readers. If Nortern Ireland is not a country in the usual sense of the word then we should not say it is without qualification. rannṗáirtí anaiṫnid (coṁrá) " | 0 |
"::I believe he was never 6'2"" but about 6'1"" and down to about 6'0"" now. I don't really get the whole ""controversy"" though, especially thinking he's about 5'10"" or whatever. He's obviously got a huge body (and head) which could make him appear shorter, but the thing is there's nothing special or amazing about being 6'0"" or over. It's pretty much the norm in Europe. Heck, I'm half asian and still 6'1"". While many actors do fudge an inch or two, and Arnold may have fudged 1"", it's rare that they'll fudge more than 2"". Otherwise they'll be ""exposed"" too easily.
" | 0 |
qing dynasty
if qing were korean, why did they attack korea, make it pay tribute, force it into hermit kingdom, force them to erect a humiliating stelea in their honor | 0 |
Thanks for the clearly expressed basis for deleting the content. Although it does seem to me that the language deleted could have been adjusted so that it came within the sources cited (and would have been tougher to justify deletion if it had started out that way) on balance it is best deleted because of the way in which the sources are phrased. I guess if the FBI wants to actually accuse someone directly of something, they know how to do it. Thanks for assuming good faith in my edits as they were intended as such even though they have turned out to be inappropriate for the reasons you have given. | Talk | 0 |
JMacbonniehunt.jpg
is being contested. Please do not orphan until result is known. | 0 |
Genre: New Depth
hi,
so I got your point but otherwise I don't know what to do. new depth is a music genre. any kind of music genre is on Wikipedia so why not new depth? if I post something in a forum and tell everyone of new depth and mark it as a quote in wiki will it be enough?
im really sorry for asking again, I just don't get why there must be a proof, that this exists. there are a lot of genres, just known by a some people, but enough for having an article on wiki.
please tell me what to do, to get new depth in wiki. and: is it completely deleted, cause it took me a hour to translate everything. can I find the deleted version somewhere?
thanks, paul | 0 |
, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
I support Mysticmartin on this. The article should clearly be based around Cohen's version, writing, etc., but later recordings by others which are significant for one reason or another deserve their own sections within this article. That would cover the Cale and Buckley versions, and the Alexandra Burke version which is clearly going to be a major pop hit (Cohen's first no.1 ?) 14:59 | 0 |
"
Solo Beatles
Can anyone confirm that the solo Beatles albums listed were all on MFP, and not (as I have an inkling) on one of EMI's other budget labels? Also, I'm pretty sure Ringo's ""Ringo"" and ""Blast From Your Past"" were also re-released on MFP." | 0 |
REDIRECT Talk:List of Polish gminas (O) | 0 |
I had amended it to reflect the campaigning/serving distinction; I just need a non-blog citation. The U.S. Constitution, perhaps? | 0 |
and didn't have to order online. I | 0 |
Whatever buddy, IP address blocks are only temporary. I will be back. | 0 |
"
Unspecified source for Image:Ruff1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ruff1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Man " | 0 |
Yes I have done I would now be grateful if you could email it through to me. | 0 |
"I have contacted Wikipedia regarding the ""possible copyright infringement"" notification regarding the text provided on Albert Henry Krehbiel's page please refer to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Henry_Krehbiel.
The reason provided by Wikipedia's ""Cryptic"" for the deletion of the Albert Henry Krehbiel page is as follows:
09:52, 12 May 2008 Cryptic (Talk | contribs) deleted ""Albert Henry Krehbiel"" (G7: One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page)
Accordingly, G7 states: Author requests deletion, if requested in good faith, and provided the page's only substantial content was added by its author. If the author blanks the page, this can be taken as a deletion request.
I AM THE AUTHOR AND I NEVER MADE SUCH A REQUEST OR BLANKED THE PAGE *****
As I have stated and notified you of previously, I wrote the text and along with the Krehbiel Corporation provided and gave copyright permission for Wikipedia and The Worldwide Art Gallery to post such text as seen also at http://www.theartgallery.com.au/ArtEducation/greatartists/Krehbiel/about/.
Again, I and we at The Krehbiel Corporation hold all rights to this writing, as well as many others, on Albert Henry Krehbiel and there is absolutely no copyright infringement issue here at all I wrote the article.
Thank you very much, again, for your kind consideration and assistance.
Don Ryan
The Krehbiel Corporation
Website: http://www.KrehbielArt.com
Email: DRyan@KrehbielArt.com
Office: (847) 864-4724
Cell: (312) 331-0258
Fax: (847) 864-4708" | 0 |
Military history WikiProject Newsletter - Issue IV - June 2006
The June 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. | 0 |
"
Outback the koala: and I consider your disagreement to be utterly without merit. Denmark and the Philippines (i) have never engaged in a war (ii) do not have significant trade, (iii) are not/were not allies, (iv) do not share a border, (v) have not been engaged in a significant diplomatic conflict & (vi) have not been engaged in a significant trade dispute. Therefore there is no significant ""relations"" needing to be put ""into context"". There is simply a scattering of indiscriminate WP:IINFO minutae typical of low-level interaction, giving ""context"" to nothing beyond itself. ''TalkStalk''(P) " | 0 |
It was NOT vandalism. To you, maybe, but to this user, no. Given your record of personal attacks. 65.41.9.182 | 0 |
"I would say that the communists being sent off to death camps by the nazis is enough to say that facism is not socialist. To respond to those that say that Hitler and the lot stopped trade for the gays, jews, gypsies, communists, and the hole lot neglect Hitler's views on these people. He did not take their stores and wealth away from them because he thought they were doing bad with it. He did so because he thought they were less than him, or damaging his power. An anti-capitalist fights for trade regulations because they believe the capitalists to be doing things immoral. A fascist does so because they don't like the people. For those of you who think my argument is weak, I say it atleast beats Billy Ego's ""argument"" above.
" | 0 |
Why not?, it's only a simple question. | 0 |
Putting here at the top all the pieces I need to work:
Featured log
Featured article statistics
User:Raul654/workbench
FAR archive | 0 |
Which would be enhancing the effects, genius. | 0 |
History of the petroleum industry in Canada (frontier exploration ande development)
I have just been marvelling at the work you did on this article, especially in your conversions from metric to US units. Is there a list somewhere of the conversion formulas that I can use as a reference?
Thanks. | 0 |
"
Another sock of banned user User:TyrusThomas4lyf
Please block ct " | 0 |
"
US Airways Hubs
You can't just change an article because you ""disagree."" Your only ""proof"" of LAS being a PRIMARY hub is that the route map calls it a ""hub."" However the company's annual report further defines it as a SECONDARY hub, which it also does to PIT. Please stop reverting this article when I have cited proof. " | 0 |
Re 's lack of sobriety
I'm glad to know that he and I were in the exact same state of mind that night which is why I wasn't beeing bashfool. And, I'm delighted to be a member of your new club. º0º talk 18:23, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC) | 0 |
Block modified
Just a courtesy note to notify you that I've modified your block of to indefinite per a previous discussion on ANI. I suspect you were not aware of the discussion and assume you are ok with the modification. Cheers. | 0 |
" I'm only trying to be semi-awkward here, I am actually intrigued as to whether or not I should be able to type here or if it's just a mistake. talk to me " | 0 |
Oh and other editors/admins remember this is a communal IP address for a school. | 0 |
"
Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Sandra for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. " | 0 |
Disruptive edits
Hello, . Despite 's statement, you have not so far been reported at WP:Administrator intervention against vandalism as far as I can see; but if you continue your disruptive editing you will be. Looking at your edits, I get that you have strong opinions about John de Ruiter. While I know nothing of him, I have some sympathy with your position. But you are going about your campaign in a way that is disruptive to Wikipedia, and you need to stop.
First, as you have already been told, you introduced material (and, in particular, critical material) into a biography of a living person without giving any references to a published source which supports your material. This is absolutely forbidden, but the first time you did it our policy of assuming good faith should lead any other editor to just remove your additions and explain to you that this is not acceptable; and this is what happened.
What you are encouraged to do at that point, is to discuss the matter on the talk page Talk:John de Ruiter, and try to reach agreement with other editors; if you are unable to do so, our dispute resolution procedure would tell you how to proceed.
What you did do, is to insert your unsupported material again. This is called edit warring, and is a quick way to get yourself blocked from Wikipedia.
Assuming that you are in good faith (i.e. that you think the de Ruiter article is unbalanced), your best bet is to start by finding some reliable published sources which are critical of him (not blogs or forums, but material from reputable publishers). If you can find some, then you may edit the article to add only what is supported by the sources you have found (though in view of your recent history, even in this case you should probably start by discussing it on the talk page). If you cannot find such sources, then I'm afraid you must not edit the page further. Unsupported material and original research are not permitted in Wikipedia articles.
I suspect that you believe that it is important to expose something you think is not right about how de Ruiter presents himself. If that is that case, I'm afraid that Wikipedia is not a soapbox, and you may not use it in that way. | 0 |
I'll stop, okay? ''''''( talk) | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.