text stringlengths 1 29.3k ⌀ | label float64 0 1 |
|---|---|
The discussion page of FF speaks for itself as it is one long personal attack and incivility from start to go. Hardly the point, when I initiated the discussion focusing on NPOV and sources, reverted (rather than edit war). Furthermore my last edit included much of the latest attacks (linked), which my edit adressed. If you were interested, you would have checked, rather than just focus on me while their attacks continue. We both know, my providing diffs won't matter when certain users are granted immunity. I followed all protocols and even tried to address admin, when I saw the discussion was sidetracking and going in circles. In vain. But I tried yet I am blocked. So we are through. | 0 |
from the editor about Pleurocera and Elimia | 0 |
OK. I've asked for additional Administrator input at the Administrator's Noticeboard (here), so we'll see what happens. Said ~ Did | 0 |
Regarding the page List of Barney & Friends videos, please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ()(Talk) | 0 |
Have you actually read the text concerning KLT? It says that KLT was falsely accused! Read before you revert!. | 0 |
A tag has been placed on your article Anna glypta, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why Anna glypta is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Anna glypta. Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. | 0 |
I remember it being in the discussion on Kamloops, though whether that was on what is now Talk:Kamloops or if it was on a page at WP:Canada, and exactly when that was, I don't at the moment.... | 0 |
"
I haven't seen it yet. I'm download the torrent as I type. I hardly ever watch episodes live, because my house is crowded. I'm gonna watch it tonight. ) (talk) " | 0 |
Evidence on Adil's sockpuppetry
Hi Dmc, you have had experience with Adil Baguirov socks in the past and unfortunately, his evasion of the ban has continued relentlessly. I have collected some evidence that Adil = user:Ehud Lesar, and would like you to check it out please. Here it is . I started adding the evidence, I will be adding more depending on how much you request if this is not enough. I am really amazed that no one sees anything in Adil's game. The reason I don't want to add all the evidences at once is that, from experience, I know it won’t even be read. Thanks - | 0 |
Info needed-
Do you own a Webbed Belt?, and also, what type of underwear do you wear? | 0 |
To put it short, the Virgil06 account (which, since its creation in 2007 had made two edits by Thursday morning) had created the article about Direct Selling News less than half an hour ago and no other articles were, at least at that time, linking to DSN, which made me judge the section a fairly obvious case of WP:UNDUE. But I could of course be wrong. - | 0 |
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. . Your vandalism to Spiderman 2 (video game) has been repaired as well. | 0 |
3RR RULE
That's FOUR for you today already at Saudi Arabia, Yuber. I'm assuming good faith and not going to report you on it yet. Knock it off. | 0 |
The issue is not whether you agree with Clarkson; but whether everyone agrees with the claimed adherance of this article with [WP:NPOV]]. They do not. | 0 |
When spelling errors are present on my page, I can't resist correcting them, as I've done here. Pity that I can't correct edit summaries. | 0 |
proposition to add link puck.ch
I propose to add a link to http://puck.ch/ to the page.
It includes almost all the results of Swiss Ice Hockey for LNA-LNB-1st league-2nd league since season 1995-1996.
What must I do to be able to add it to the page ? | 0 |
"
Are you serious, hon? Have you taken a look at my ? I fully support Mr. Herek and all he does! I knew nothing about the man, however, and didn't know if he satisfied WP:N or not. However, since the major rewrite that took place, I took off the notability tag. And even improved the article. So, when you get a chance, please read about Wikipedia's guideline on assuming good faith, k? Thanks (talk | contribs) " | 0 |
Sharapova notable matches
I really believe that this section is completely unnecessary; almost everything written there has already been covered elsewhere in the article (and if it is not, then one must ask the question if it is not notable enough for the main article, is it notable enough to be included on the page at all?). Your thoughts? | 0 |
I'll consider that a second personal attack on your behalf, . You sure are good at those false accusations. You sure have a lot of proof, don't you? | 0 |
" \Thanx
But:
I am NOT intersted to sign, as I do DISAGREE with many who are granted the privilege of monitoring the Wikipedia as moderators.
We first need to clean the house and get those who should NOT be moderators as they luck the qualifications.
This applies to some moderators from EASTERN EUROPE with unintentional nationalistic or pro-communist orientation, some military personell as moderators is vandalizing articles with wrong methods of confrontation, and some members of US Congress who are correcting their CV (RESUMES) specially prior to e(R)ections.
This applies also to people specialy those with PhDs who think they know it all and in real life they only read some required by programs books prepared by special intersts and really know nothing!
To many young, inexperienced while colorful ""PHEASANTS"" are allowed to be moderators.
The YOUTH and inexperienced irrational behavior is NOT a substitude for over half of the century education and experience.
" | 0 |
Rose in Richmond, Indiana
Your last edit was confusing (to me anyway). Take a look. Cheers. Stan | 0 |
User Theredpenofdoom
Help me report the changes done by Theredpenofdoom. He/she is a horrible editor. | 0 |
I see enough people here in FL without a helmet, and even my instructor is not enforcing it, so I guess it is not here. at venus | 0 |
Update- this split is almost complete- now a 3-way split- and list of compounds will cease to be a list at the end of May 2005. After this, please see list of biomolecules, list of organic compounds and list of inorganic compounds. | 0 |
Your block
I raised the issue of your block both at User_talk:Kelly_Martin#Unblock_request
and at WP:ANI#Block_of_User:Cardsplayer4life_by_Kelly_Martin. In
both cases I was unable to obtain support for unblocking you. | 0 |
So will you please inform as to how Jura House are able to have an external link? | 0 |
(No heading was added for this post) | 0 |
"
Mantras
I like mantras. I think they work. I especially like this one; Calm your mind in order to restore equilibrium and normalcy. . Talk " | 0 |
"
76.23.169.18, I ask you to do me a simple favor. Please go back and read ""your"" version of the article you posted earlier. Then read the current version. Can you honestly say that your version reads more neutral and balanced than the current one? If so, then I'm sorry, but you are delusionally partisan. But I don't think you are, you seem to have common sense, and I think you see the difference. I'm not saying the way I've written it is perfect but I think it's a lot fairer than the way you edited it to be. Not that I really blame you, since it seems you are more invested in to one side...despite what you think, I don't have any significant relationships with Democrats in Debicella's district. But that's beside the point...I just hope you see what I'm trying to get at and consider that maybe, just maybe, you are trying a little too hard to clean this thing up for Dan. If you continue to make any major edits to the article as is, without good cause and sources, I will continue to revert those edits, which will inevitably lead to it being locked and administrators having to babysit us again. Let's try to avoid that, shall we? 64.252.251.75 " | 0 |
My user name says it all. | 0 |
Thank you for the clarification - that is certainly not the sort of editor we need around here. Promoting the extremist climate POV is not welcome in this volunteer project. - 2/0 (cont.) | 0 |
", 22 September 2012 (UTC)
Also, regarding deleting stuff that ""apparently no one really cares all that much about to begin with anyway,"" you have to remember that a lot of people don't know how Wikipedia generally works when they add content; I'm willing to bet that most long-term editors here added unsourced content the first time that they edited Wikipedia. And some topics are things people care a lot about, but no one has gotten around to fixing the article about that particular topic up. 134.255.247.88 01:21" | 0 |
"
Perceived intellectual capacity
The word ""perceived"" is being added to the phrase ""His (perceived) intellectual capacity is being satirized ..."". This is, seen from one side, redundant, since intellectual capacity is always a perceived feature but assuming a divergence between ""perceived intellectual capacity"" and ""(actual) intellectual capacity"", (semantically) it is his (actual) intellectual capacity the one that is being satirized (irregardless of it being high, low, average...). Einstein intellectual capacity has also been satirized, sometimes as high, sometimes as being low. Satirized=(aprox)ridicule. You don't say, for example, instead of ""The play ridicules you"", ""The play ridicules the image we have of you"". " | 0 |
If you'd like to discuss something at music of Djibouti, please discuss it at talk:music of Djibouti. If you continue to revert, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. | 0 |
"
* * *
I look at a lot of articles (such as BillCJ and many others and it reminds me of books that were published in the 1950 - lots and lots of facts boring, dull uninteresting pictures - picture with no history surrounding what is being published. In the 1980-90's, a lot of True Aviation historians (i.e. Roger Freeman, Jeff Ethell, Warbirds Worldwide, etc..) found that aviation historians wanted and needed history recorded. The captions of their books detailed who, what, when, where, etc... As we progressed into the 2000's, I am finding that today’s writers unfortunately, want to dumb down the article - instead of giving all the details to allow the readers to decide how much level of detail he wants - Again, unfortunately, BillCJ (as well as others) want to take the Dick & Jane approach to aviation history.
This is suppose to be an online reference/encyclopedia - often when you Google an item, the wiki article is the first reference to pop-up so this will be (unfortunately) the first and only reference many will have for a subject. A subject has to include everyone that references and item, whether it be a 4 year old doing his first model airplane, the aviation historian, the F-16 Buff. These articles are also used by serious models who want the details.
Articles only tell part of the story - you need the pictures to compliment and point out what the article is discussing. In the same vein, the pictures need the same level of detailed study (if possible) and care that is place in creating the entire article. Having a great and fantastic article (such as the F-16) with kindergarten captions makes the entire article pointless.
It is also unfortunate that other editors like Askari Mark feels that detailed captions are meaningless to most readers - again, you can not have an online reference/encyclopedia without filling crossing the t and doting the i's. Without detailed captions, it like having no reference section - sure you can print captions that state "" Gee an F-16 in Flight "" - especially when it is clear that the airplane is sitting on the ground. Or the case of one article ""Aircraft is on a bomb-run"" when it was clear from the picture that the bomb-bay doors were closed, no guns in the waist position and the detailed history showed the aircraft actually was a trainer and never left the United State...
BillCJ also mentioned "" are you seriously suggesting that "" serious historians "" only read WP articles for the pictures? "" - it is a proven fact that 90% of all information processed by humans come from Visual"" data (i.e. pictures, etc...) - this is the reason Picture books are popular with preschoolers. The first thing a majority humans look out when reading any thing is the pictures - if the pictures are interesting then many people will stop and read. If an aviation historian comes across an article that details the subject matter then he will stop and read the contents.
It is also been said that this article is not for the F-16 Buffs - if this is the case, then
why have technical specifications
why have details on each variation??
Why have the nuts and bolts of each individual user??
Etc, Etc, Etc...
Why have detailed information regarding anything regarding the aircraft if this subject is not going to reach out to those who can say yes, this is true (i.e. the historian/buff) - If you are going to have the nuts and bolts in the article then you have to carry this same thought patterns over to have the nuts and bolts details in the photo captions.... (for example: B-52 Specifications, B-52 Costs, B-52 Variants) etc... this type of informations IS for the Aviation Historian / Buff and generally not for the casual reader (which is MY point in having detailed captions).
If we dumbdown the photocaptions for the ""causual reader, then this level of details Specifications, costs, variations also needs to be removed as it will only confuse the "" casual reader "" and will lead to people calling all such information "" gobbledy-gook "".
If we dumbdown the photocaptions or call detailed information "" gobbledy-gook to most readers "" then terms such as: Wing area, Airfoil, Zero-lift drag coefficient, Drag area, Aspect ratio, Maximum speed:, Combat radius:, Ferry range, Service ceiling ,Rate of climb, Wing loading, Thrust/weight, Lift-to-drag ratio are ""gobbledy-gook to most non-aviation readers""
BillCJ has also mentioned that Wiki is not the place for F-16 Buff's to write article - This is complete opposite what the founders of wiki wanted when this project (wikipedia as a whole) dreamed many, many years ago - Wiki w | 0 |
"
Source troubles ... your opinion.
While googleling for some extra sources for the Dutch/Flemish thing, I came across this page. I'm not sure what kind of website it is, as its mainpage seems to have ceased to exist, but anything ending in ""[...]front.org"" is likely to freak out Paul111, so I thought I'd ask your opinion of it first.
I think it is some neo-pagan website or anything, mostly focused on Germanic mythology, but I also found a section ""volkenkunde"" which seemed as if it could be worthwhile. It's written by people with at least one doctoral degree, and at first sight it doesn't look ""nazi"" if you know what I mean. They do use ""ras"" a couple of times, but that might just be jargon. Well check it out for yourself and give me some feedback. Thanks in advance. " | 0 |
your recent edits
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Talk | 0 |
This user...
...is Canadian. | 0 |
"Neptune, while you're waiting this block out (and hopefully reviewing your behaviour), you may also want to think about how WP:ANI works. It's not a ""referendum"" on anyone in particular. Editors are free to bring issues there which they feel require attention and action by administrators. However, you don't get to fix the terms of what is being discussed, the editors making the review do. The aim of the reviewers is to decide how to fix the problem and this requires consideration of the behaviour of all parties to the problem. It actually happens quite often that the initiator of the thread finds themselves on the wrong end of resulting sanctions, in fact there's an essay about just that.
" | 0 |
R-Kelly]] vs. [[Kelly Clarkson | 0 |
False
This article is factually inaccurate.
- Stephen Spatz history teacher G.A.S.D. | 0 |
Cleaned up some info on the general page, the new album is already released! | 0 |
"
Montreal Impact Roster numbers.
Walter:
What counts as a reliable source
""Articles should be based on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Source material must have been published (made available to the public in some form)""
According to these rules you pointed out the OFFICIAL broadcast of the Montreal Imapct v Houston Dynamo in the Disney Pro Soccer Classic. it is ""third party"" ... it is from a source that has a ""reputation for fact-checking and accuracy"" and it was ""made available to the public in some form"" ... that form being live broadcast.
there is no reason that squad numbers verified with the source of the OFFICIAL LEAGUE BROADCAST cannot be considered a reliable source by the very rules you quoted me. i will be making the update again based on these rules and that my source adheres to them directly. do not undo them again.
173.165.207.241 " | 0 |
", 11 July 2007 (UTC)
P.S. Every city has a skyline of tall buildings. So what is ""stunning"" about having tall buildings in Minneapolis? - 16:14" | 0 |
On Nowruz and flags
Please just have a look here and here. I think your latest edit does not do justice to historical facts and also may unnecessarily create resentment. You might also like to read this, which shows that history played out against aspirations of many people in that part of the world. Perhaps you wish to revert your own edit. Kind regards, . | 0 |
Hello there,
Is there any specific reason why you targeted and gutted all the articles I had helpfully contributed to? There didn't seem to be a legitimate reason to remove any of the accurate and useful information I added to individual articles off the Ring of Honor employee page. While I am sure you had your reasons I respectfully request you refresh your memory by going to Wikipedia's articles pertaining to Good Faith Edits and remaining civil. Thank you very much and have a great day! | 0 |
, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Yes, as far as I know, all the userboxes that list your number of edits require the user to enter the numbers manually. — 20:24 | 0 |
December 2008
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. —
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. | 0 |
I'm a freelance journalist who has written for a number of magazines, content providers and periodicals including Ink 19, In-Site, The Orlando Weekly, Connections, Prodigy Service, CitySearch.com, Focus-In, Juggernaut, Jam Magazine and Buzz. | 0 |
As fascinating as this as this sounds I don't see how this is relevant to the improvement of this article. Still let me read this... ) | 0 |
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bose Headphone Family
I know that you have don't usually work on Bose related pages but I was hoping that I could get you involved with the discussion here! Thanks ) | 0 |
Sorry, but I'm not an administrator and therefore don't have any ability to revert page moves. You should report this to the appropriate subpage of WP:AN. — | 0 |
"
explanation of removal of material from 熱雞蛋 paragraph
I removed most of the following added by User:218.254.84.171 on 07:56, 2 July 2006
In China scrambled eggs are know as ""re ji dan"" or, 熱雞蛋，and are made in a special way. Firstly, the eggs are scrambled, or beaten, with a whisk or fork to blend the egg white and yolk. Some salt and pepper or other seasoning is usually added and the mixture is then cooked. To make lighter, fluffier scrambled eggs, some milk, cream, soy milk or water is also added.Then, instead of being put of a heat-transferring equipment, it is fried lightly on a pan with seaweed. It is served with rice or dumplings
The reason is easy to see when you compare one of the paragraphs in the beginning describing the cooking of scrambled eggs:
To make scrambled eggs, the eggs are first scrambled, or beaten, with a whisk or fork to blend the egg white and yolk. Some salt and pepper or other seasoning is usually added and the mixture is then cooked. To make lighter, fluffier scrambled eggs, some milk, cream, soy milk or water is also added. Cheese may also be added when cooking the eggs. The eggs are finally cooked on a heat-transferring surface, such as in a frying pan coated with melted butter, margarine, or cooking oil...
As you can see, the first three sentences for cooking 熱雞蛋 are just copied from the top (which is especially funny since milk and cream are not widely used in Chinese cooking). The sentence that is slightly different:
Then, instead of being put of a heat-transferring equipment, it is fried lightly on a pan with seaweed. (熱雞蛋)
Compare with:
The eggs are finally cooked on a heat-transferring surface, such as in a frying pan coated with melted butter, margarine, or cooking oil... (scrambled eggs)
Well, if frying pans are considered heat-transferring, why is not the case for 熱雞蛋? That just makese no sense.
So the only differentiating factor we're left with is the supposed addition of seaweed. However I'm strongly disputing this. While seaweed is used in Chinese cuisine and Chinese cuisine can be quite varied due to the vastness of China and the diaspora of ethnic Chinese all over the world, I have never heard of eggs cooked with seaweed in Chinese cuisine. No doubt someone out there might cook their eggs with seaweed, but it's definitely not something common in Chinese cuisineyou find me a restaurant that serves the eggs cooked that way! Indeed even in Japan where seaweed is used more commonly, eggs are still more likely to be cooked without seaweed, and then maybe you sprinkle some seaweed on top for garnish or seasoning after the eggs are finished (or for sushi, you may see the egg omelette tied with seaweed to a block of sushi rice). So anyway, I'm not believing this unless you can point me to a relevant source.
So when all said and done, we're only left with the Chinese name and that it may be served with rice and dumplings, which is what I left unremoved. " | 0 |
"
Thanks for the response, and again, welcome! (talk) " | 0 |
Poop sandwich eaten, lesson learned. | 0 |
"
In the newish section of the article about naming, there is a sentence that states that some Swedish speaking Finns would prefer to be known as ""svenskspråkiga Finnar"". I believe that is completely rubbish as use of such a term does not make sense in the Swedish language (especially in finlandssvenska) as finne/finnar refers specifically to a Finn or Finns who speak Finnish as their mother tongue. There is no equivalent distinction in the English language (i.e. the word ""Finn"" in English includes all Finns regardless of language, the equivalent Swedish would be finländare). I think it should be removed. Certainly as one myself, I know of no Finland Swede who would call themselves this. " | 0 |
All your base are belong to us
There seriosuly has got to be a better way than the current way. , for instance, is a solution, but due to the multiple line breaks it doesn't work for this text. I consider it to be an WP:ASR because Wikipedia should be written like it might be printed, and in a print version there's going to be no problem at all with Japanese character sets. | 0 |
To add on to this, editors should also proof read this article to get rid of any original research or bias. | 0 |
Restoring the article without consulting the Project which redirected it to begin with can only end up in an edit-war, which is what happened. | 0 |
Sounds good. When the track list is properly confirmed, the refs I added can be removed and replaced by one ref at the top of the section. Regarding the cover, it looks reliable enough and similar to the ones for the previous releases, so I should leave it until the release version is issued. Thanks for your help. —JIM | 0 |
"
Hate Crime
I believe the category for hate crimes is acceptable and appropriate for the Jesse Dirkhising article. Rape is an act of hate and not an act of love. Rape isn't just a sex crime (power over a victim) but also a crime of hate (committed against an innocent), regardless of who the victim is or was. There was debate over this in the media from conservative commentators. Therefore I feel the category fits. Please discuss here if you feel otherwise. Thanks. cool " | 0 |
I am not sure about the legality of fake copyright tags, but clear pranks have copyright tags under them as well, so.... It would be another story if individual titles were trademarked though. | 0 |
i wasnt implyint deception. i said it is unlikely that they would release that information. to clarify, police generally will not release those kinds of details unless they are seeking assistance from the public. -badmachine | 0 |
Problem is I am blank about ezhava rituals.. So, can't comment on anything related to them. If you ask about Thiyya rituals I have plenty to say. This legend is recently added on Feb 16. Just see the history. It is added by a user from South Kerala. He/She has only contributed to ezhava page. So, obviously it shows they have some vested interest. That is the reason, my request to remove | 0 |
pardon me? 71.191.135.10 | 0 |
"
I agree, and this is the approach I tried myself. See my recent summary of this dispute under ""More of the same"" (which might be overlooked since not at beginning or end of this page). Needless to say, this didn't seem to satisfy my detractors. 22:35, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)" | 0 |
It's okay, I am happy you did not delete it, this way everyone knows the whole story of vindictive people and their pathetic life, who must pick on sick and disabled children. THANKS! | 0 |
Typical. Every time some clown tries to sound intelligent, he goes and uses words he just looked up. That is not intelligent. Having the mind that can reason and not have biases is intelligent. | 0 |
And since when is being registered non-profit is an indication of reliability? All that takes is filling some forms. | 0 |
Also what specifically have i been blocked for and for how long? | 0 |
The Endo Group
Thanks for the invitation - I'll jump in! | 0 |
Do you have something against WWII generals? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nathan_Bedford_Forrest_III He died in WWII fighting for our country | 0 |
Have U no decency you have insulted my people, my nation and my ancestors and refulte that fact that I AM WRONG, the one that lives in Ireland is wrong I DON'T think so. Yes you are a ballbag (scrotum or testacles) because you seem to think that i am going to lie down and take this crap without a fight becuase you have this notion in your head that you are wikipedia and that you think you know everything. I happen to have a degree in Irish history and poltics so don't try and preach to me on these matters. I think an apology is in order for your insults and disgraceful remarks. | 0 |
The Saskatchewan Party has absolutely nothing to do with Grant Devine or the Progressive Conservative Party of Saskatchewan. They are completely seperate entitites. Maybe *you* personally associate Devine with wrongdoing, but you do not speak for the electorate or anyone in the Province of Saskatchewan other than yourself.
And once again, it is completely innappropriate for civil servants to be protesting the actions of their employer publicly. Public criticism of your employer in any business is usually grounds for dismissal. The only civil servants dismissed by the Government of Saskatchewan during the Devine era, aside from normal layoffs and workforce reductions, were those who violated their sworn responsibility of impartiality and loyalty to the duly elected government, and rightfully so.
By the way, the Devine legacy is looking better and better all the time with the incompetence of Lorne Calvert's government rearing its ugly head, most recently, with a $500 million privatization scheme concerning Crown Corporations. | 0 |
yeah, but also, who's sure the year is '78 not '77 or '79? thats all the years i saw so far | 0 |
"
Oh, what you wrote was ""Both of you need to just let this go or both of you are going to end up blocked for disruption."" I interpreted that as meaning I couldn't take the subject further despite new developments which I think are allied. Thanks for the direction to thataway because I believe they need to be investigated further. Cheers. " | 0 |
"
""The Negro Soldier"" was a 1944 War Department film encouraging African-Americans to enlist. It is unrelated to the ""Why We Fight"" series.- mobo85" | 0 |
You are the best Wikipedia user EVAR. | 0 |
What did I do that was vandalism first of all and second off all the only thing you ever did was accuse me off something I never did. You think I'm stupid, You think I'm a idiot, and you hold a huge grudge against me. So to be honest don't even think of letting that block expire because you now what I would never want to contribute anything useful to this site ever! | 0 |
"
Thanks for letting me know – I was also planning on nominating it at DYK, too, if I could find something unique about the hurricane. I'm not sure if your hook is all that interesting, per se, but I can always add an alternate hook next to your nom if something else comes to mind. -) Cheers, ☆S93 " | 0 |
Right, basically, if something is confusing or poorly defined, feel free to clarify; saying what devil fruits are is something that should be in the article, but a list of all devil fruits should not be. | 0 |
"
Response #2
I will not take this frivolous reprimand from someone who may be ""under the control of a Chinese secret service agent named Xing""...
Please realize that we have the best possible references possible, this reference is from the original movie, straight from the movie itself." | 0 |
And if I get fair use? | 0 |
"
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of families
You may wish to also delete List of families (biology), the name to which the nominator for this AfD changed the nominated article shortly after he nominated it (as far as I can tell, this caused no confusion in the AfD). ''TalkStalk''(P) " | 0 |
Also, I would still like to be informed as to why the following personal attack by an administrator against another user (i.e., other than myself) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Tibet#Re:_Evaluation_of_PRC_rule remains undeleted. | 0 |
"
Mel Etitis, your post implied that my comment above was ""unfounded"" . To be clear, are you saying you are not Peter J. King and that you are not using the sockpuppet ? talk-email " | 0 |
I agree with JamesMLane 100%. | 0 |
I think they should be separate. There was a Voyager that predated the Caravan. | 0 |
noart.uh
https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion;=1&espv;=2&ie;=UTF-8#q=amiel%20tison tsktsk | 0 |
i am sorry for any trouble i have caused. My friends told me about the edit feature on this site, and how they screwed up some information; so i decided to see how it worked. I was just seeing how it worked and what i could say. I did not get the first warning message until i had already attempted to change the sites. And I do not believe that i vandalized the general motors information; i just stated what was true. i would like to contribute some information to your site. thank you.
{{unblock/i am sorry for any trouble i have caused. My friends told me about the edit feature on this site, and how they screwed up some information; so i decided to see how it worked. I was just seeing how it worked and what i could say. I did not get the first warning message until i had already attempted to change the sites. And I do not believe that i vandalized the general motors information; i just stated what was true. i would like to contribute some information to your site. thank you.
i am sorry for any trouble i have caused. My friends told me about the edit feature on this site, and how they screwed up some information; so i decided to see how it worked. I was just seeing how it worked and what i could say. I did not get the first warning message until i had already attempted to change the sites. And I do not believe that i vandalized the general motors information; i just stated what was true. i would like to contribute some information to your site. thank you.}} | 0 |
I'll try to list all the changes from the previous cabinet in the Cabinet of Zoran Milanović article to see what needs to be done. As for articles on individual ministries, we should wait for English language translations to become official and later split them from existing articles, leaving them unlinked in government templates in the meantime. That way we should have redirects in place for articles which will continue to use obsolete ministry names and properly titled articles reflecting current situation. There's no rush to get it right. (''talk) | 0 |
"
Yes, and you're a Belgian. It's a separate page on ""20 centuries Netherlands"", and is owned by the Teleac/NOT, the Dutch public educative broadcaster. " | 0 |
Diagram
The diagram includes Pan in the hominini whereas the wikipage defining the hominini excludes Pan from that clade. They cannot both be right. | 0 |
Up Pompeii!
Up Pompeii! would seem to be directly inspired by a Funny Thing, but is there evidence for this suspicion? | 0 |
A personal entry, moved here | 0 |
As you can see, i renamed to Water on terrestrial planets. Now we can have sections on each, with links to main articles, and when we have info on new such bodies, no name change is required. | 0 |
"
Other artist to be brought up for consideration (if only to be kept off the list!)
Some artists that may need to be explicitly stated whether or not they belong on the list:
Deadsy
The Birthday Massacre
Deadstar Assembly
Within Temptation
Voltaire
Cinema Strange (Speaking of which, what happened to their article?)
Murderdolls
Wednesday 13
The Dresden Dolls
Dead Inside the Chrysalis
Nine Inch Nails
No, I don't think that any of these belong on the list, but they will make excellent additions to the ""Previously discussed artists"" list." | 0 |
Again, you deleted key information from my edits instead of adding in relevant information or linking to relevant references. I am reporting you to the admins for willfully attempting to delete key imformation from the article. cmoti | 0 |
Thanks for the notice. Atleast one article edits I saw were written in one of the most biased wording I've ever seen. Reverted that. ' | 0 |
"
Not to mention it would seem you visit a number of metal band pages and so you must have noticed that many use line breaks in the infobox. Not that that truly matters but I still don't understand why you are doing what you're doing. Not to mention you either lied or made a mistake by saing you agreed with Blackmetalbaz. He would not agree with what you have just done. He does not change genre delimiters. $ODIN$ " | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.