text stringlengths 1 29.3k ⌀ | label float64 0 1 |
|---|---|
RE:Recategorising anon
Do you think it is the same user as the accused anon? | 0 |
It would be interesting for you tailed Jews to read this and khalili.pdf this about Khalilli. He was indeed not only a Tajik, but also a great Tajik nationalist who hated the Aughan Jews more than Nazis the Jews. He was a thorn in the eyes of Pashtun dogs and other fascists->AughanMellatis->Aughan Nazis84.59.202.75 | 0 |
"
How to I become a ""established user""? - " | 0 |
Full text in Bulgarian | 0 |
Barrett on Corporal Clegg
Some source I've read in the late 15 years and over (since I'm a Floyd Fan), refer to the presence of Barrett playing guitar with Gilmour also in CORPORAL CLEGG. Is it true? | 0 |
"
Why did you delete the image
Wikipedians must have some sens of humor
dont you think so ?
Let us discuss this
search for sources about ""sense of humor"" in the internet so that you see if it is reliable" | 0 |
defunct?
The article sources a claim that WOJAC ceased to function in 1999 to an article by Shenhav, but his is contradicted by the following, which states it was still active in 2001: - page 222 | 0 |
"
Speedy deletion of Tanner Turner
A tag has been placed on Tanner Turner, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. " | 0 |
The 'desire' for users to navigate the vagaries of he Wikipedia UI is all yours, as is the ensuing discomfort. Users will use systems in the most user-efficient way. If this does not coincidd with the desires of those who feel a sense of ownership for the system they are best served by taking up the responsible UI issues with their designers - the responsible party - rather than the users - the 'victims' of poor design. | 0 |
a sanctioned world championship with 10x10
http://www.msoworld.com/Olympiad/titles.html#OTHELLO(10X10)
although it seems the last time was 2001 | 0 |
"
Edit 647046975= 8 changes at once
welcome back from the one month block .
I'd appreciate if you start slowly- there were 7 too many questionable edits at once in this, your last edit. we previouly discussed not having another ""history"" subsection for example, so I d appreciate if you didnt make that change. please only add sourced material. " | 0 |
Teamwork
I would be wikking to work with Kirill and other folks here on improving articles. | 0 |
(Australian politician)|Edgar Graham | 0 |
Samhain & Halloween edits
Clicked on Halloween discussion, one German editor Bakulan is trying to rewrite the article how he sees it (apparently German view of having absolutely no pagan celtic origin whatsoever) and has done so to Samhain article, and with no concensus. Noticed you are Swiss so you would be aware of the apparent German view on this which Bakulan is enforcing. My personal knowledge on historical origin is very limited so my input would not be worth much. Having looked at edit history, you have contributed to Samhain page probably more than most, so i thought i'd notify you of this (if you haven't already got it on watchlist of course). | 0 |
", 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Is it standard Wikipedia policy to block people for comments on their own talk page? Literally everything I've posted since the initial warning, save a response on your talk page that, while harsh, did not contain any personal attacks, has been on my own talk page in response to his ridiculous use of the ""edit war"" warning template in response to a single edit. The civility page explicitly discourages overuse of warning templates. 68.81.192.142 22:44" | 0 |
"
Somthing that might interest you
Yet another discussion over PWI and world title recognition has sprung up over at WP:PW, more productive than the last. I thought you might find interest in the discussion here Cheers!Truth " | 0 |
Hi (sorry)
Why do you devote your life to stop vandalism on a website?????????????
76.67.105.188 | 0 |
"
Josh Gallivan
You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.
Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.
If you are not ""notable"" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) " | 0 |
Logo
I changed the caption because the logo illustrated is not Holtom's original 1958 design. | 0 |
How can this be justified? | 0 |
In view of your continued abuse of a (voluntarily!) departed editor, both on and offwiki, and since I'm retiring and can't monitor the situation further, I'm forced to reinstate Mbz1's user talk access. Continue to abuse her, and she met yet return just to piss you off, and it'll be no-one's fault but yours. For God's sake, have a clue about when to hold your tongue. talk | 0 |
Your change originally appeared to me as your blanking the entire article. I don't know why that happened, but that is a very bad glitch. I now see that you only removed one unreferenced sentence; a perfectly appropriate edit. Sorry about the vandalism warning above. | 0 |
", 2 December 2008 (UTC)
The links have to be examined to see which ""Harris"" is intended. Usually, the context in the linking article makes this clear, but sometimes the best you can do is leave a hidden comment that the link needs to be disambiguated, and let someone else figure out which ""Harris"" is the correct one. 21:26" | 0 |
Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 09:14, 12 February | 0 |
REDIRECT Talk:Gauntlet (NES video game) | 0 |
Although it is good, it is a HUGE block of information. Please divide that in paragraphs to make it visually attractive. | 0 |
Also can you please cite an instance where I actually was being incivil? Asams10 was yelling at me in caps, and was using vulgar language. I never yelled at him, or used vulgar language when dealing with him. | 0 |
"
In the English language the ""word Magyar"" doesn't exist, this doesn't mean you people aren't calling yourselves magyars isn't it ? I've told you that Vlach is an exonym
A Catholic encyclopedia may be an obscure source if it's hungarian and used to advance hungarian views, please translate what the hungarian catholic encylopedia states and the source of the Catholic Encyclopedia because this is english wikipedia and we don't understand a word " | 0 |
loading
colt pistols were neither breech loading nor breach loading | 0 |
" The OTRS email didn't give a more specific author. Do I replace it or ought I to keep it? ∴ChatMe! " | 0 |
Looking for Alibrandi
Did you edit Looking for Alibrandi into an article solely about the movie? As the movie came after the book, was of arguably lesser quality and had a number of differences in plot, do you not think this was inappropriate? Instead of getting rid of all the information regarding the book, you could have instead split the article into Looking for Alibrandi and Looking for Alibrandi (movie). Kronecker | 0 |
Proposed deletion from because of Wikipedia:GNG - Added several more references to other motorsports websites. Agree that there are no notable sources, but there are lots of smaller websites providing verifiable data proving that this article is correct and that Adam did receive coverage on various sites. | 0 |
Turns out you didnt, Josh, but im still here! | 0 |
"
""The films chosen to be shown at the festival, being organised by the Johns Hopkins University’s Paul H Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS), all relate to Pakistan and, without exception, can be said to be hostile in content to Pakistan and Pakistanis."" I think user darkness is going to far with his vandalism and must be stopped the sources clearly indicate what I have stated 109.150.60.235 " | 0 |
um, lil curt don't you think ScrapIron? see talk page per our previous interactions | 0 |
"
""such as the glaringly obvious fact that many scholars accept the basic parameters of an an overall ""Pontic-Caspian steppe"" origin theory without swallowing every last detail of what Gimbutas came up with in the later part of her life.""
So 4% Kurgan Theory = 100% Kurgan Theory? Nice math! Not ironic at all. Me obtuse? Okay. Sure, boss. I mean, are you really rooting for a neopagan revisionist tale?? Are you a Wiccan or just undiagnosable? To reiterate just in case you lost attention: Pontic-Caspian homeland => within reason; Kurgan => petty modern gender politics. Anyways, I know you're just trololollin' on WP but when you're ready to learn linguistics and archaeology for real, I will be more than happy to help you out, you hilarious neopagan. Until this intellectual drought of yours passes, I still rather enjoy this dialogue for more immature reasons, I admit. 50.72.139.25 " | 0 |
"
Wikipedia Regrets The Errors
From June to September of 2007, several false and misleading critical statements appeared at the National Civilian Community Corps (also known as AmeriCorps NCCC) page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Civilian_Community_Corps), in violation of Wikipedia standards. This is the false text as it appeared:
National Civilian Community Corps
""...Criticisms
The NCCC program has met with sharp criticisms from some fiscal conservatives who accused it of being a ""boondoggle"".[4] Most notably, Libertarian pundit and commentator James Bovard has been one of the most vocal Americorps NCCC opponents, calling it a ""waste and fraud""[5], in addition to dedicating an entire chapter of criticisms of the program in his book ""Feeling Your Pain: The Explosion and Abuse of Government Power in the Clinton-Gore Years."" Robert Sweet, the former director of the National Institute of Education, labeled it ""a fraud"".
^ http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,188385,00.html ^ http://www.enterstageright.com/archive/articles/1000americorps.htm""
Wikipedia relies on its readers and volunteer contributors to avoid or challenge and correct misleading or false information.
The following has been called to our attention:
1. The statement that read ""...Bovard has been one of the most vocal Americorps NCCC opponents, calling it a ""waste and fraud,"" cited as its source an article at this address by Bovard: http://www.enterstageright.com/archive/articles/1000americorps.htm Nowhere in that article does Bovard make that statement. No mention of ""AmeriCorps NCCC"" nor of the ""National Civilian Community Corps"" appears in that article, nor is AmeriCorps NCCC called a 'waste and fraud."" We regret the error.
2. The same sentence went on to state the following: ""...Bovard has been one of the most vocal Americorps NCCC opponents, calling it a ""waste and fraud"", in addition to dedicating an entire chapter of criticisms of the program in his book ""Feeling Your Pain ...""
Upon investigation, this statement turns out to be untrue. Bovard's book (published in hardcover by St. Martin's press) does not contain a chapter of criticisms of AmeriCorps NCCC in the book ""Feeling Your Pain. In fact, neither ""AmeriCorps NCCC"" nor the ""National Civilian Community Corps are mentioned at all in the text of that book nor in the book index. (The chapter in question concerns the umbrella program, AmeriCorps, but does not mention the program known as ""AmeriCorps NCCC'"" or the ""National Civilian Community Corps"".
(The only mention to NCCC is in the footnotes, referring to a speech by then-president Clinton, praising, not criticizing, the NCCC.)
In sum, the book ""Feeling Your Pain"" does not dedicate ""an entire chapter of criticisms"" of AmeriCorps NCCC, contrary to the information posted at the Wikipedia website. We regret the error.
3. Also untrue was the sentence ""Robert Sweet, the former director of the National Institute of Education, labeled it [i.e., AmeriCorps NCCC] ""a fraud"". This sentence was misleading and false. It was placed at the National Civilian Community Corps page and referred to the antecedent in the previous sentence, the AmeriCorps NCCC.
The claim relied on the article by Bovard at http://www.enterstageright.com/archive/articles/1000americorps.htm. No mention of either the ""National Civilian Community Corps"" nor of ""AmeriCorps NCCC"" appears in that article. No evidence has been put forward to support the statement that Mr. Sweet ever labeled AmeriCorps NCCC a ""fraud."" We regret the error.
Wikipedia deeply regrets that this misleading text appeared at our National Civilian Community Corps website and that it persisted for as long as it did.
The editor responsible for its appearance and continued re-emergence will no longer have access to the National Civilian Community Corps Wikipedia entry.
Signed: _____
[Philippe - Calls to move forward on the National Civilian Community Corps page, to be a team player, etc., would be better received if Wikipedia posted a note something like the above at the NCCC site - not to mention, it might restore Wikipedia's credibility on the subject. I don't know if there is a snowball's chance of that happening, but at least this gives you some information to process so you can evaluate the current situation. Given the nature of the NCCC - a substantial and serious component of U.S. disaster relief and mitigation capacity - and its recent near-demise following misleading claims like those posted at Wikipedia, the statement above is not written as amusement.] " | 0 |
"
Regarding edits made during September 7 2006
Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. (talk) " | 0 |
If wikipedia does not allow rumours or news then how come the majority of articles on tv series, films, music etc are filled with rumours and news on upcoming storylines, characters, release dates, singels, albums etc???????? | 0 |
Watch the user Theredpenofdoom
Watch the user theredpenofdoom .
See the redmarks. He is vandalazying the whole wikipedia. | 0 |
LOL, it seems as I'm unblocked. Everything cool now? | 0 |
its true he was gonna make him be made why else whould the Sindaccos get JD made he was Halgf Irish and African American and he was about to be made by the Leones this proves that that is false dawg | 0 |
Again - do NOT edit the article in question. You have a conflict of interest. Request edits on the talk page. | 0 |
Frangex
Re this edit; my understanfing is that you consider this an invalid reflink? | 0 |
"
Image copyright problem with Image:Soulton Hall.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Soulton Hall.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you created this image yourself, please look at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#For image creators, select one of those tags, and add it to the image. To do that, simply go to Image:Soulton Hall.jpg, click ""edit this page"", and add the appropriate tag. Be sure to remove the current tag indicating a lack of licensing!
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me at User talk:Angr or at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. —gr " | 0 |
"
User:Rau J
I see where he has made comments that things you have researched and written were ""OR."" I have had a pretty good experience in a recent Request for Comment against him over the same issues. Perhaps you might want to consider taking the same route with him too if this incivility continues. " | 0 |
"
{| width=""100%"" style=""background:transparent""
{| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#""
|style=""width: 50%; border:1px solid #; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""|
Hello Dmaras, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.
Happy editing!
{| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#""
|style=""width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""|
Getting started Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page Finding your way around Table of contents
Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article
Manual of Style
|style=""width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""|
{| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""2"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#""
! Getting help
|-
|style=""color:#000""|
Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Where to ask a question
Help pages
New contributors' help page
|-
! | 0 |
"
I don’t think that the video merits inclusion. —Preceding unsigned comment added ." | 0 |
You are most welcome-and if it is OK, I'd like the replies under your talk page. I love that photo but don't remember the date
I enjoyed reading the GD article as well, a heck of a lot of information spanning 30+ years!!! | 0 |
"
You started it with ""BullShit"" about Fetzer having a POV expressed. You are not Neutral and clearly your ""United States Marine Corps"" colors your opinion and exposes your motive for censorship but none of that is relevant to the idea that the article is about the group itself and not about ""What others think"" about the group. As a contributor, I have found the most adequate definition of the group and included it.
You are acting silly. It is like if you don't agree with a groups message you think it is ok to redefine the group for anyone looking for information about who the group is. I don't like the KKK but I am not editing the Wiki article to make it more ""Black Friendly"" or ""Negative"" about them. I would even cite their founder as a definitive source for who they are because that is the ""OBJECTIVE"" thing to do.
Semper Fi yourself into some common sense. " | 0 |
"
Not a problem. ) Sometimes I type too fast or I don't read what I am writing so that the sentences aren't confusing, that is an example of me not watching what I am writing. Again, my apologizes. Take Care and Enjoy Your Weekend... T:C " | 0 |
Yes, I wasn't trying to correct the names ... I was just trying to flag the issue, but this should be done on the article page, not the talk page, as nobody will look here ... | 0 |
"
Thankyou. I appreciate your comments also ). You have made my day better too. My golly, we're bloomin' fantastic, me and thee, you gotta admit! Hehe ;) drama " | 0 |
"CynRN
Let's re-visit this topic in Feb when the Spine publication comes out. It's clear that you do not understand or appreciate the positive impact of the manual medicine, including joint manipulation. But, I can tell you from my experience thus far, many ""intractable"" neurological and orthopaedic conditions that have been referred for surgery are simply neuromuscular imbalances that are very treatable by chiropractic care and manual therapies. Maybe it's time to revisit the notion that DCs just ""crack backs"".
Regarding your comment on the possible side effects (headaches, dizziness, numbness), pale in comparison to the side effects of many medications used to treat pain syndromes. Now, to clarify, I'm not against medications at all, however to fear manual therapy, including manipulation, is not supported by the research. To call my profession a pseudoscience shows either a lack of awareness of chiropractic in 2008 or ignorance (take your pick). In an evidence-based era, no health profession can escape the responsibility to demonstrate clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness through research. I suggest you start reading manual medicine journals so that you can better inform your colleagues of contemporary physical/manual medicine practice.
" | 0 |
Support It's worth including in the article | 0 |
Well, if you look at Talk:Fart, you'll see an awful lot of people saying the article should be merged and/or deleted. Imagine my surprise when only one person agreed with me when I actually made the nomination. I hardly think that was misguided of me based on available evidence. T | 0 |
"::I would say that the process of ""lumping"" and ""splitting"" is intimately connected to phylogenetics (not to cladistics) by the fact that reality is ambiguous, both in a momentary and in a historical perspective. This is actually the problem that cladists think is connected to the Linnean systematization, and try to solve with cladistics. However, cladistics does not solve the problem, but only transfers it into concepts, erroneously equalizing time with space. The problem (i.e., ambiguity) is actually the difference between reality and our comprehension of reality. This statement is extremely difficult to understand, although it is perfectly clear: the problem (i.e., ambiguity) is the difference between reality and our comprehension of reality. The problem to understand it may be due to that it is a difference, since a difference is unsolvable. This problem, that is, this fact, is consistently incorporated into concepts in a systematization of the Linnean kind (i.e., categories of categories). It means that the possibility for lumping and splitting is both necessary and unavoidable. An unambiguous conceptualization is simply impossible. The question whether this fact means that reality is ambiguous has to be answered with: yes. There is no way to escape this ambiguity. Mats Envall (presently at 83.254.20.53 ]
" | 0 |
or attempted generalization | 0 |
Back to research now. | 0 |
"
Isn't Judy Wood a ""Dental Materials Engineer""?
Judy has some experience in that field, but it's not her specialty. From her bio (on her tripod page): B.S. (Civil Engineering, 1981) (Structural Engineering), M.S (Engineering Mechanics, 1983), and, Ph.D. (Materials Engineering Science, 1992) Virginia Polytechnic. ""Her dissertation involved the development of an experimental method to measure thermal stresses in bimaterial joints. She has taught courses including Experimental Stress Analysis, Engineering Mechanics, Mechanics of Materials (Strength of Materials), Strength of Materials Testing. From 1999 to 2006 Dr. Wood has been an assistant professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Clemson University in Clemson, South Carolina. Before moving to Clemson she spent three years as a postdoctoral research associate in the Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics at Virginia Tech. Dr. Wood is currently writing a book with Morgan Reynolds on the physical evidence explaining the events on 9/11. One of Dr. Wood’s research interests is biomimicry, or applying the mechanical structures of biological materials to engineering design using engineering materials. Other recent research has investigated the deformation behavior of materials and structures with complex geometries and complex material properties, such as fiber-reinforced composite materials and biological materials. Dr. Wood is an expert in the use of moiré interferometry, a full-field optical method that is used in stress analysis. Dr. Wood has over 60 technical publications in refereed journals, conference proceedings, and edited monographs and special technical reports. Dr. Wood started to question the events of 9/11 on that same day when what she saw and heard on television was contradictory and appeared to violate the laws of physics. Since that day she has used her knowledge of engineering mechanics to prove that the collapse of the World Trade Center twin towers could not have happened as the American public was told. "" " | 0 |
That's completely up to the consensus of the editors working the article...the images are free so we can do what we want with them. Talk | 0 |
" July 2011 (UTC)
Insults in BLP/N not just ANI: Just when I thought the big insults were in WP:ANI discussions, I see the ""ignoramus"" text was stated in WP:BLP/N, now archived within:
WP:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard/Archive123#Discussion_regarding_categorization_of_living_people
Search within that archive for ""ignoramus"" as a term used to discuss the ""categorization of living people"". There is just so much hostility, that I wish editors could be given a forced (60-day?) time-out from editing some talk-pages or articles. Let them focus on something else, with less hostility. -Wikid77 11:35, 18" | 0 |
Was it simply my username? Any guidance is appreciated! | 0 |
primary topic?
[James P. Hogan] is a disambiguation page pointing here and to some filmmaker. the filmmaker has a third the incoming links and a tenth the traffic and google presence. i'm inclined to move this article to the main topic and add a hatnote to the other guy, if no one objects. | 0 |
Nonsense (
But I want them to unite D
I am sorry I dont know Russian, not yet anyway ;)
I am from Sweden. Schools here are free, but to study Russian at an uni level is no joke so I dont know if I want to do that AND to study what I am allready studying which is math but I will most likely jump to physics.
And nice seeing you to ;)
( ) | 0 |
The link in the reference section no longer works. | 0 |
, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
My thoughts exactly 22:32 | 0 |
No problem. If you need anything else, don't hesitate to drop a line on my talk page. | 0 |
That is an understandable interpretation, however I'm not sure that the article fulfills the obligations of notability:
There is only one source. The standard is reliable, independent sources: That is, two or more.
I haven't seen Ax-men, but was the episode about lumberjacks, and not about Gustafson Logging itself?
—EncMstr (talk) | 0 |
Instead of doing that review my unblock request sincerely and honest, that's all I' m asking for and then give me a chance. You all are denying me the opportunity to prove myself . | 0 |
"
Seyi George Olofinjana
Hi,
You've recently given me a ""last warning"" for adding some nicknames for the Wolves player, Seyi George Olofinjana. These nicknames are all ones that have been widely used on one of the most popular internet forums concerning Wolves, www.molineuxmix.co.uk.
If you don't agree with them being put on there, fine, but I don't think it's really fair to ""warn"" me for posting nicknames that are in wide use amongst Wolves fans." | 0 |
(Toronto)|The Cathedral Church of St. James | 0 |
2006: Darren Clarke (golfer) is currently the 7/4 favourite to take the prize this year. | 0 |
It just happens to be your website. Which is just too big of a coincidence for this old cynic ;-)
Just a bit of advice, you would achieve much more by discussion and collaboration rather than unilaterally making decisions, reverting and ignoring. Have a bit of common social tact. | 0 |
"
Etymology
The etymology section was completely wrong. The Hebrew consonant ""Tsade"" results from the merging of (at least) two proto-Semitic consonants. They are still distinct in Classical Arabic, as ""Ṣad"" and ""Ḍad"". It is easy to see that ""chamets"" corresponds to the Arabic root ḥ-m-ḍ, because the Aramaic version (which appears in the Aramaic parts of the Hagada) is ḥamiʕa (with `Ayin), and almost all Arabic ""Ḍads"" map to `Ayin in Aramaic. In Hebrew, the root means both ""sour"" and ""leavened"" (cf. ""chamuts"" =sour; ""chomets"" =vinegar; ""chumtza"" =acid). In Arabic it is used mostly to denote ""sour"" or ""acidic"". In any event, ""chamets"" is not related to ""hummus"" or ""Homs"". ""Hummus"" is ""chimtza"" in Modern Hebrew, and in one case, ""chometz"" in the Bible might be ""hummus"" rather than vinegar, but the root is historically different, and only accidentally did they assume the same phonetic shape. 79.177.167.209 " | 0 |
bionic dog episode
This site says it was Sept. 10 1977 and was the first episode on NBC. Did this show exist? Did the series really switch to NBC? | 0 |
Apologies, that must have been a double-edit with the IP changing 2006 to 2007. Sorry about that. | 0 |
"
Germanic Europe
The explanation given in your edit (23:06, 28 August 2010) suggests that you recognize that at least a part of Ireland should be classed as Celtic rather than Germanic; ""whys a paragraph on Celtic Ireland belong in the intro about Germanic Europe?"". Therefore, I'm sure you'll agree with the removal of that bullsh*t image at the top of the article, which represents Ireland as Germanic. Maybe you can create a more accurate/appropriate one. Finally, the article itself is largely nonsense, as has been mentioned on the talk page. " | 0 |
Using that logic (ordering them as on ABC Medianet), one could make just as strong an argument that the cast should be listed in the order of their cast bios here on the offical ABC Grey's Anatomy page. That would put James Pickens Jr. ahead of everyone except Ellen Pompeo and Patrick Dempsey. One could also argue that they should be listed based on what they're paid, since those figures were recently reported, in which case Isaiah Washington and Katherine Heigl could well wind up on the bottom of the list. I really think that listing them in billing orderthe traditional method, as pointed out by the above responsemakes the most sense. I won't revert it yet, hopefully some other people will add their opinions, so we can establish a better consensus? | 0 |
Hey Jacobite. Basically what he's saying is you reverted his changes without explanation. The same way you revert many other edits by other editors simply because you feel that you are better then everyone else and that all Wikipedia articles that you have any interest in must be written just as you like it, the actual facts be damned. | 0 |
An Actual band Called Benny and the Jets
There was once an Australian band called Benny and the Jets, obviously named after this song. They released at least one single and were in existence in the late Nineteen-Seventies. Does anyone have any information about them? (They weren't the only one in the world, surely?) | 0 |
User:Vaoverland - administrator
Thank you for supporting my appointment as an administrator. I appreciate the pat on the back this represents. It felt nice to read the comments during the voting. Please let me know if you see something I should be doing as admin, as I intend to be fairly passive unless it is clear I should do otherwise. Thanks. Mark in Richmond. 20:06, Mar 6, 2005 (UTC) | 0 |
copyvio etc
Hello Kleinzach,Thanks for your message. A lot of this has passed me by as I have been out of the loop. I can only repeat to you what I said to Voceditenore: I quite accept all you say, and I'm sorry you've had so much trouble. With hindsight I can see it was imperative to sort out both the copyvio and the splintering user-identity questions.Perhaps I should have worded my thanks to NRS less effusively: but when we have all marched together in the ranks, it is hard for me not to feel a pang of regret for an enthusiastic fellow-traveller that has sunk by the wayside, however he may have strayed - and there is little harm in one murmur of thanks in the epilogue to the Dies Irae. If all our faults were painted in our faces, what a sight we'd be!I look forward to seeing your future efforts with pleasure, and take this opportunity to send greetings and to wish you well. There are still a lot of redlinks in that Wagner singers list!! Best wishes, | 0 |
Dubious map was removed. | 0 |
This was not written by LRH, therefore is not canon to the Church of Scientology as per KSW (Keep Scientology Working) | 0 |
"
Arabic form: الملك or ملك
I may easily be mistaken, but shouldn't the Arabic form given in parentheses be simply ""ملك"", without the definite article (-ال)? When so prefixed, as the article itself indicates, it refers exclusively to God (""the King""), not the more general, ""human"" concept. Or at least that's my understanding. " | 0 |
"::::And the consensus of WP:Aircraft is summed up by ericg on Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Aircraft/page_content#Specification_figures, ""The primary units are always those which the manufacturer used. In the case of European aircraft like Airbus products, metric comes first.""
" | 0 |
"
Why must I explain why ""this particular aspect of the statistics is more significant than other aspects?""
Do any of the other statistics in this article have explanations for their inclusion?
Why do you have a problem with these statistics?
Why don't you explain why this particular aspect of the statistics is less significant than other aspects? " | 0 |
I'm sorry you believe you are not required to adhere to WP:SOCK but I assure you this is not the case. | 0 |
Thanks for the heads-up Dave I'm not a satirist, but sarcasm is a concept which goes above the heads of the females, if you get what I mean. | 0 |
"== Tone needs work ==
The tone of this article, especially the Meng-tse part of the ""Questionable Accuracy"" section, is much too informal. For example, Wikipedia should not be saying that it's ""theoretically possible"" that Meng-tse was reincarnated 300 years later try something more like ""Some have raised the counterargument that Meng-tse might have been reincarnated..."" or something. In other words, to make this article read more like an encyclopedia article, try revising it with a neutral point of view and formal tone. " | 0 |
Please address these points, otherwise your Autopatrolled flag may come under review. Thanks. | 0 |
Cool thanks for having a look. i don't disagree with you i just liked how it is now but it may be a better idea so i will just see how things go, as for the picking on the Townsville and Thuringowa page it just felt a bit that way, i know it will help get a higher rating but it just looks like a bit of an attack when editers ask for every line to have a ref and the ref at the end of that piece covers the whole bit....oh well i'll just let it go for now and try to do all that is asked, i think i only have the sport part to ref now.
thanks again | 0 |
A 1998 game?? Can't you send it to me? | 0 |
"
A response to ""For the attention of the IPs inserting the 'racism section'""
I inserted facts documenting instances of named sources accusing Catherine Glick of racism. I'd like to take a moment to address comments in the ""For the attention of the IPs inserting the 'racism section.'""
Please do not misinterpret documentation of allegations of racism for allegations themselves. The section inserted, apparently subject to some controversy, is ""accusations of recism."" In that section, the accusations of racism that several writersEileen Read, Alex Pareene, and Paul J. Balleshave leveled at Caroline Glick are documented. Properly, no opinion or point of view has been expressed in the ""Allegations of racism"" section as to the veracity of these allegations.
1. I therefore cannot understand why documenting such allegations could be considered controversial, let alone ""potentially libelous"" as you say. The documentation of specific allegations of racism by named sources need only prove that such allegations exist, not their veracity. Documentation of written defenses of Ms. Glick's work are solicited and in fact highly encouraged.
2. I apologize for linking to www.youtube.com. The link I should have used was the one from Ms. Glick's homepage. That link is at: http://www.carolineglick.com/e/2010/06/we-con-the-world-the-gaza-fl.php
3. I never claimed to be other than a single user even though, incidentally, all of the contributions to the ""Allegations of racism"" section are not mine.
Incidentally, if it matters, I for my part am a fan of Ms. Glick's work and do not believe that she is a racist. I contributed to the section to advance the Wikipedia mission to provide a forum where issues of public significance can be documented in a way as to provide reasoned information to the public. one of Ms. Glick's detractors, Eileen Read, wrote an article in the Huffington Post accusing Ms. Glick of racism and asking that she be fired. The article is making rounds all over the internet and has likely been read by hundreds of thousands, if not many more. It'd be a great shame from my perspective if Ms. Glick's career suffered as a result of such charges (since they are, in my own personal view, baseless)such charges should be documented neutrally and weighed against the writings of Ms. Glick and her defenders, aiming only to inform the public, which can then decide. When I inserted a reference arguing that Ms. Glick's positions are ""not racist"" but ""common sense,"" it was taken down by those same persons invoking BLP standards and undue weight.
69.110.8.85 " | 0 |
Why do I only get one warning? | 0 |
I wish Epsilon hadn't started the whole thing. It is now a big mess. | 0 |
I got it from the publishers website ) Yeah I'll keep an eye on it. It seems strange that they seem to know quite a bit about wikipedia policy but don't have an account? Maybe they're trying to cover their tracks for whatever reason... | 0 |
How to upload an image. The entire procedure is clumsy and is it possible for me to snap photos of all celebrities and have my own copy right. brief me the possible way to upload an image, how to find it is copyright unprotected... | 0 |
There are racists and anti-Islamists in this article. Its being attacked continously without proper discussion. user:Mohummy is responsible for it. 78.150.198.151 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.