text stringlengths 1 29.3k ⌀ | label float64 0 1 |
|---|---|
STOP IT
I DID NOT CHANGE ANYTHING STOP SPAMMING ME220.255.2.131 | 0 |
"::Also, responding to a comment made in the edit summary, both sides of the story ARE put across in the lead and in the article: A small group of ""researchers"" say it's paranormal, the reliable evidence says otherwise. Don't say both sides aren't put across (when they clearly are) just because the side you happen to support isn't given precedence. (Talk)
" | 0 |
Loves everyone in the world. | 0 |
"
You know, this has already been debated and it was determined that putting neutralizing language into the article was the best way to address this issue. The infobox says founder ""Traditionally, Jesus"". date ""est to be the year 30"". This passed the GA for NPOV. It was POV to say anything else especially since our main source - the National Geographic says Peter was the first Pope. We don't have anything better to give us a better date. " | 0 |
The score for the 1982 world championship was 18-15, and not 18-16 as listed in the article.
Tim Sandle | 0 |
"
Please read through the sources before commenting on it. There has been no copy-paste job, but a quote has indeed been added from a second source. Read the sources. May god give more knowledge to all of us.
This is the source added into the article. It concludes with this:
""Their attack on ""the masculine voice of rights, autonomy and abstraction"" bodes ill for a liberal society... Their effort to abolish male privilege while preserving and expanding
female privilege is likely to create the very backlash feminists fear. Moreover, most women do not want their brothers,husbands, or sons to live under a legal system that presumes them guilty; nor do they believe that sex is rape, freedom is a male plot, and an abused woman can be her own judge, jury, and executioner.""
Unless anyone can come up with a formula that converts above statement into 'Feminism calls for equality', I suggest refrain from adding that statement without proper source. " | 0 |
Ming Dynasty
Are you trying to tell me that James Wales is a sexy man? | 0 |
Why did you get angry? Because someone wasn't listening perhaps? Well join the club. EVERY single one of you jackasses either haven't heard a word I said or are deliberately refusing to listen.71.174.142.108 | 0 |
"
University of Wisconsin–Madison (ndash) redirects to University of Wisconsin-Madison (hyphen). Regardless of which one it is suposed to be, the Wikipedia article is at the version with the hyphen. – (talk) • (contribs) " | 0 |
Plot details and minor characters
I imagine my edits will probably be reverted several times, so I may as well start this in case. Character articles describe characters, but they are not meant to hold every single plot detail relevant to the characters. Entries should have a basic description, background information if it is necessary, and plot details only if they deal with character development. Something like Doyle's development is fine to list, while random graphic novel appearances are unnecessary. Character lists also only deal with important characters. Minor characters are covered within plot summaries, and if people want to know more Wikia exists for that reason. | 0 |
???
This is not relally a religion and where is the humor tag? | 0 |
Norway and Sweden
Why aren't Norway and Sweden listed in this article? There share much in common with Communism, such as far-left anti-Semitism. Also, Nazi Germany was a socialist state because Nazism is a type of socialism that is very similar to Communism. | 0 |
"::*It's interesting how frequently you point out minor WP ""rules"" when this is probably the most blatant case of article ownership that I've ever seen. 68.199.96.18
" | 0 |
As I stated on my talk page: Thank you for explaining your edits, and I see your point about the Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie articles. Not a claim, as you can see. And though I have seen other Wikipedia biography articles include personal life information in their leads without their being any kind of opinion on removing it, it is no doubt that, in some of these cases, it is because those things are notable or are aspects of the person's life that have been significantly discussed in reliable sources. For example, Leonardo DiCaprio's environmentalism is not only a part of his personal life but has also received significant media attention.
I will not challenge you on this any further, although I still do believe that a person's personal life should be summarized in the lead in some form...seeing as I feel that leads should adequately summarize a topic.
Oh, and thanks for taking care of the fear of flying issue as well. | 0 |
I'm replying to your question on my talk page. – (BoomCha) | 0 |
i love the free encyclopedia (Wikipedia) | 0 |
July 2014
Please stop edit warring on Iron Dome. Wikipedia editorial decisions are based on consensus, and it has been established some time ego, after lengthy discussions involving Wikipedia editors, that the term 'militants' shall be used in Wikipedia articles to adhere to the Wikipedia policy of Neutral Point of View. If you would continue to edit against consensus, you are likely to be topic-banned or blocked from further editing. Thanks and regards, | 0 |
Sir
Thank for your reply. But I thought I set up my account before the block?
Also for a few weeks now I have been trying to set one up but I find it difficult because the username was being used. | 0 |
27 February 2010 (UTC) | 0 |
Of course, you're also not supposed to bring someone to trial if you don't have proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Law in this country is going to hell.
That said... they need actual malice to Fed indict Wilson? What more do they need than that he shot at a fleeing Brown, who wasn't armed? | 0 |
Taos, New Mexico
The article has been though quite a bit of clean up. The tags are over the top. If you read the article you will see that this is indeed the case. | 0 |
You want to know why. To tell you that I know everything about you. Jack | 0 |
Eh, I'll respond anyway. Look, , let me give it you straight. You and I are not so different. There are 24,000,000 Wikipedians on this site. And those teeming masses exist for the sole purpose of lifing the few exceptional people onto their shoulders. You and me, we're exceptional. However, these Wikipedians, the majority of them, are liberal. And they love to advance liberal/progressive causes, but also find some Republicans/conservatives amusing. But the one thing they love more than a conservative politican, is to see that conservative fail, fall, die trying. In spite of everything this conservative has done for them (such as Jesse Helms), eventually they will hate you. That is why I came to Wikipedia. I came not only to fix some factual errors prevalent in some Wikipedia articles; I also came to give a much more NPOV to articles involving conservatives, where oftentimes bias, and even some out-and-out factual distortions, are prevalent. Wikipedia's time has come for fixing. Like Constantinople or Rome before it, this place has become a breeding ground for suffering, bias, and injustice. It is for this reason, Bbb23, I'm asking you to unblock me. Yes, I will follow Wikipedia's rules to the letter if you do. As far as I'm aware, there's nothing in Wikipedia's rules against removing bias from articles. In fact, WP:NPOV encourages it. Think about it, Bbb23. I could accomplish a lot of good. Adios, | 0 |
03:03, September 20, 2015 | 0 |
"
My point exactly!!
berlet is adding extensive unsourced original research
Cberlet is adding extensive orginal research and wildly POV assertions regarding his 20 year old claims that simply are not borne out by the references. All assertions to the effect that ""Berlet subsequently found out the evil cultists were lying"" that are not references are simply self serving original research and are being removed unless berlet can find a reference to support the claim. As well, the angry POV tone of Berlet's edits are being removed, and I suggest cberlet not use an encyclopedia entry as a vehicle for angry OR POV statements.
As to the response from Newman's organization to ""Clouds Blur the Rainbow, Berlet himself in the discussion above says:
There are many publications from the (BLP issue deleted [ie, ""Newmanites""]) that have criticized ""Clouds Blur the Rainbow."" An NPOV entry will include criticisms from ""Clouds Blur the Rainbow,"" and then criticisms of the criticism in ""Clouds"" from the various (BLP issue deleted [ie, ""Newmanites""]) publications.
But when the response was added, he and King keep deleting it, claiming it is ""gossip"", while adding three paragrpah from a gossipy letter to the editor from 20 years ago, which is considered ""research""!!. Come on now fellas. " | 0 |
Because if it's not then it looks cheap and tacky. That's the impression the segment gave for her. To include it is really insulting to her. | 0 |
"Contributions:
/Sandbox a - Mowbray Military Services 1106 to 1485
/Sandbox (b) - Mowbray McDermott
/archive 1 - Dieu et mon droit: refs 1.
/archive 2 - Dieu et mon droit: refs 2.
/archive 3 - attributed arms: Talk refs.
/archive 4 - Clan Campbell: Talk refs.
/archive 5 - Pickwick Papers - Joseph Grego - Robert Seymour (illustrator): Articles.
/archive 6 - Arthur - Beam me up Paddy Talk refs.
/archive 7 - List of James II deserters to William of Orange: Talk refs.
/archive 8 - UK Privy Council Membership expansion 1951 to 2011 Edit refs.
/archive 9 - User Talk Page to:
We may rest secure and supported within the truth and innocency of a good conscience, which will ever give countenance to honest and Christian endeavours against bitter censures and uncharitable imputations.
Stephen2nd (talk) 14:57, 28 April 2008
Only specialized people know why this happened. Reply: ""Better. References are good"" TALKIN REVIEW ME
Robert Seymour (illustrator) v. Seymour Controversy
REF: Fribbler. 19th September 2008. EDIT: (It's not ""the"" Jane Seymour. It was his wife.)
The fact of Robert’s wife ( and daughter ) named Jane Seymour, in comparison with “the” Jane Seymour, must be considered when analyzing evidences, motives and causations of Robert’s death.
“The” Jane Seymour wife of Henry VIII was mother to the last English King Edward VI. (English law forbade matrilineal succession) As determined in the will of Henry VIII, Edward Seymour, Lord Beauchamp (b.1561), his 3 sons; 3 daughters and brother, were all named as successors to the English Throne, (then again after Elizabeth I, and James I.)
The 1st evidence of a Seymour (Beauchamp) ancestry being usurped* occurred in the German 1st reign (matrilineal descent) of King George 1st. His Prime Minister; Walpole ('his' crest representing the House of Wettin – Queen Victoria) usurped the confiscated McDermott – Beauchamp Arms (Chevron; Cross Crosslet, and motto Dieu et mon Droit.)
During the childless reign of King William IV, Robert Seymour’s suicide verdict literally determined him as a felon, and for his crime, his properties were forfeited to William IV, for the German 2nd reign (Victoria’s matrilineal descent) of her Sax Coburg-Gotha heirs.
Thus, the (Seymour) succession of Edward VI; went to (Sax Coburg-Gotha) Edward VII. 24 September 2008 (UTC)
NB: George V (1911): 100 year “Official Secrets Act - Death sentence for Sax Coburg-Gotha disclosures;” (1911 to 2011.)
NB: Insert or new article/section? Many citations/verifications/references available. Consensus &/or opinions wanted.
Qui tacet consentire videtur?
Oath of Allegiance (United Kingdom)
(EDIT: Opposition to the oath)
Parliamentary Opposition: An Early Day Motion (12th June 2008) to change the Oath of Allegiance, was brought before the British Parliament by 22 parliamentarians, representing over 1.45 million; English, Scottish, Northern Irish and Welsh (British) constituents. This EDM arguement was widely reported in the international medium on 8th August 2008.
Early Day Motion (#1780) ''""That this House recognises that the principal duty of hon. Members is to represent their constituents in Parliament; also recognises that some hon. Members would prefer to swear an oath of allegiance to their constituents and the nat | 0 |
After Bertha has beaten Irenes duration there is Lisa and Jeanne of 2004 then Ivan. Ivan isn't going to be beaten and 2004 isn't long ago. Nor is Ginger 1971 going to be beaten. What is the second longest duration since 1971? (So far found Lisa 16 days and nothing over 18 days) If Bertha takes this, would saying this appear more sensible than longest since 2004? | 0 |
why long article labels?
Believe me, the discussion about length has already occurred thoroughly, several times on articles such as WWII and the Civil War, and probably every article you've cited. No need to throw out the possibility when it's been hashed out. I paid the most attention to the WWII article talkdon't bother,(and I don't think these article are too long). | 0 |
"
Fair enough. But I removed the following paragraph because it is vague, reads like an opinion, and has very little to do with him. If you want to talk about how his book references these things, that's fine, but the section I removed (below) is not worded that way.
""Engler also highlighted Canada's subsequent participation in the United Nations occupation of Haiti and the training of the Haitian national police by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, which Engler and others have asserted has resulted in an ongoing campaign of murder, imprisonment, and political repression targeted against supporters of the Lavalas party and opponents of the un-elected interim government headed by Florida resident Gerard Latortue.[3]""
Engler also highlighted... (where? how?)
which Engler and others have asserted... how does this relate to a biographical encyclopedia entry?
...in an ongoing campaign... this has nothing to do with him." | 0 |
"
It's awful either way. Without templates of any kind, there would be much less clutter. The templates confer absolutely no benefit but lots of drawbacks. talk|contribs " | 0 |
No API anymore?
Got the following message, when trying to download lyrics with Quod Libet:
Unfortunately, due to licensing restrictions from some of the major music publishers we can no longer return lyrics through the LyricWiki API (where this application gets some or all of its lyrics).
The lyrics for this song can be found at the following URL:
http://lyricwiki.org/Razorlight:Wire_To_Wire
(Please note: this is not the fault of the developer who created this application, but is a restriction imposed by the music publishers themselves.)
80.130.215.178 | 0 |
J3Mrs has now asked for all his/her sandboxes to be deleted. | 0 |
carlito cool
his long lost son is Carlito Cool, and it should be added because this is a very important part of his storyline in the WWE. | 0 |
Regarding edits made during December 13 2008 (UTC)
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Boy George page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make the edit(s) to which this warning refers. | 0 |
That's an extremely generous statement, and I really appreciate it. I harbor no ill feelings as well. ) | 0 |
Let me respond again.
I usually get a l lot of negative reaction when I introduce something with which lay readers are not familiar.
I don’t have a pro-dictator bias. It just seems like that because I’m correcting articles that were already one-sided. History's not a pros and cons analysis anyway. Historians want to know why and how.
Also, I don’t use one explanatory model (like Marxism, World Systems Theory, Dependency Theory, Modernization Theory, etc.) solely. I don’t keep my mind closed to one interpretation.
If an article chronicles any facts, I leave them if they’re accurate. But they must be explained in a context. Statements like ‘he’s an authoritarian dictator bent on staying in power at all cost rejected by the international community’ will go in favor of statements like ‘because of his controversial policies he’s been ejected from the Commonwealth at Britain’s behest'.
If an article mentions that Mugabe has been seizing white-owned farms it must also mention that 4,500 white farmers own 70% in the land in a country of 13 million. The article must also explain why land reform is a touted goal in the Third World. To many, that unacceptable because that's pro-Mugabe POVing. But quoting anti-Mugabe insults by as many famous people as possible is possible because it's a fact that they said those things.
Some can’t tolerate that. To them, Mugabe persecutes homosexuals; he’s a racist; he subverts democracy; he cracks down against NGOs; he rigs elections; he’s unmitigated evil; and he does that because he’s evil.
There are not that many social historians who would accept such simplistic, sweeping conclusions based on superficialities. | 0 |
=- sure!just post it here or email it... yeah. | 0 |
"
If you merge, we should change the name from OpenMotif to Motif, as starting with version 2.3.4, it is simply named ""Motif""." | 0 |
I will think about it. Please geive me some times. Let me think about new page or old page is good. | 0 |
"
...which is the reason why I first discuss it, then change it. An edit war is nothing pretty, you know? We'll see. Anyway, what you write is largely true, but misleading. Especially:
- Free oxygen, free fluorine and moisture surely will corrode the metallic walls. However, the chemical potential of the salt has to be controlled anyway so it is slightly on the reducing side, containing some trivalent uranium. So any free oxygen or fluorine will oxydize the uranium ions, not the metal structure. Moisture will be driven out with the off-gas at working temperatures. All this is pretty much a non-issue.
- Cryolithe. Yes, aluminium is produced by electrolysing alumina with cryolithe. This can be considered a mixture or solution of sodium flouride, aluminium fluoride and aluminum oxide, certainly a molten salt. But the cryolithe is really only a fluxing agent, it is chemically non-agressive and it doesn't extract aluminium or something. You hinted that it does, which is really misleading.
- Heating is not a technological issue. Sure, it adds to the cost, but other than that there's no problem. A power reactor would run quite some time without ever being cooled down, refuelling is done by adding some molten or even solid salt, without shutdown, cooling or heating.
- But tritium is a problem. To slow down tritium formation, the lithium in the salt has to be almost pure Li-7, and even then tritium will form. Tritium in the salt is no problem, it doesn't attack metals. Tritium migrating from the salt is a problem. ORNL says, they were able to chemically trap the tritium in the secondary cooling loop. A problem, yes, but nothing major.
And of course there are the political issues. An MSR doesn't fit into the ""razor-blade"" business model currently employed, research is still needed, and that is expensive, waste reprocessing is currently illegal (though this is stupid when also applied to pyroprocessing), and uranium is too cheap these days to make a breeder economically viable.
(Yes, if we can find some agreement, I'll summarize this and move it to the article proper.)" | 0 |
True. That's where I thought I was. Thanks for catching it. | 0 |
I did state all the problems of mapletip(wiki user) and his website. All users need to do is read instead of ask. | 0 |
Possibly unfree files
See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 October 31#OTRS pending since 20-29 May. | 0 |
It's till not clear what you're proposing. It would go by the spirit of the rules, not the letter of them, don't you think? (talk) | 0 |
"
Don't understand. Comment seems like a call for tendentious, WP:SYNTH edits. Wikipedia is not in the business of creating material ""to balance"". " | 0 |
"
That one....that was written immediately after recieving that lovely message, so I was angry. Is that an excuse for it, no...could have it been written differently, of course. Should have it been written at all, no. I could have deleted it without an edit summary, but I didn't. That shows you that when him and I come anywhere near each other, it isn't good. Again, not an excuse, just the way it sadly is. - T:C " | 0 |
The test isn't name recognition, it's WP:Notability. We do not report our own personal opinions. We don't have pages on subjects that seem important. We have articles on subjects for which there are multiple WP:RELIABLE WP:INDEPENDENT WP:SECONDARY sources about the subject to establish not only that the subject seems notable but that others not connected to the subject have actually taken note and that they've done it in WP:RELIABLE sources with a reputation for fact-checking and editorial control. If an individual is on this list, it should be because they're notable because that's the test we use and because it actually is objectively testable. The simple way to enforce this, the same as with other WP lists, is to insist there must be an article. Obviously, the fact the article exists doesn't guarantee the subject is notable (because people constantly create all kinds of spammy articles all the time), but we have a separate procedure, called WP:Articles for deletion for deleting articles on non-notable subjects. | 0 |
I agree. Once an IP has been tainted, I don't see the logical possibility of assuming anything other than suspicion. | 0 |
of me and my husband Édouard-Henri Avril]] | 0 |
"
Zoroastrianism stuff
I thought you might want to know, the same kind of POVing is going on at Christianity and World Religions. (talk) " | 0 |
"
Another thing, I find it amusing, yet amazing, how many people follow the 'money.' what I mean is, the expression ""If you build it, they will come."" shows true. People has an ever burning desire to be a part of something BIG; and in a way, they seek their own personal agenda to be at the top. You have tons of people who follow you and seem to be peasant servants. Why you may ask? To quote a quote ""People will always follow the white guy with the money..."" the guy with the money is the guy in control. Yadda, yadda. 97.102.160.62 " | 0 |
"
Vandalism by User Doc: Josephus
It appears that user Doc removed my/your ""tag"" to the article. In light of this removal of any edit that doesn't conform to this user's Christian POV; and this user's militant failure to accept any reasonable improvement to the article, while making reference to outrageously lame arguments to effect this aforementioned Christianization of the article; and, his previous misconduct at the Jesus myth article, (that demontrates his motives); I would like you to do something in your administrative capacity about this user. talk " | 0 |
"
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Charles II of England. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. ... talk " | 0 |
Ok, fair enough. I get your POV comment. However, we do agree that socialist is still applicable to describing both parties and their ideologies without being POV, right? Thanks though. | 0 |
Indo-Aryan Caucasians (Proto Nordics). | 0 |
References
External links
In the Name of Justice at The Tribune
Category:Honor killing
Category:Crime in India
Category:2007 in India
Category:2010 in law
Category:Indian case law
Category:Indian society
Category:Indian caste system
Category:Jat
Category:Haryana
Category:Human rights in India
Category:Extrajudicial killings
Category:Human rights abuses | 0 |
Coordinating a course
Hey Sonia, would you be interested in coordinating Wikipedia:WikiProject United States Public Policy/Courses/Spring 2011/Public Relations Seminar (Marlene Fine)? It would just require occasionally checking that nothing falls through the woodworks working with the students, and making sure the ambassadors are responding to queries and reviewing content. Also, if there are issues or the class needs attention, you could be the central contact for e-mailing the Google group, etc. If not, no worries, someone else can do it to! | 0 |
"
Readers who read this article and question the misleading information, will not find any discussion here. When editors who have been involved in the discussion can still spout nonsense about this being about the State. You actions breed ignorance, with readers going away thinking RoI is the name of the State. You were activly involved in the discussion, and you closed it. At not time could you support your arguement. 'fenian' " | 0 |
Great Synagogue of Vilna - not!
, I greatly appreciate your quick and informative response that clarified the post-WWII identity of the two Vilna synagogues. The GFH Photo Archive director accepts this correction with thanks, and I'll add mine for your contribution to making our material accurate and reliable. I'll look forward to consulting you in the future on matters of 20th C.Lithuanian history, and also on adding photo images (something I've yet to do) to WP pages I edit. Thanks again, | 0 |
to
Dear Jayron32, your help will be welcome here. How do I appeal to a higher level authority on an editing dispute? Thank you.
WH. | 0 |
"
warning
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. | ☎ " | 0 |
"
Storms remains in contract, since she's only on personal leave. She has a serious condition that is preventing her from working. As far as Lilley, she's just a temporary replacement, who I hope becomes permanent. Both remain on the coming/going list, and Storms remains listed as contract. TALK! " | 0 |
Brisbane meetup invitation
Hi there! You are cordially invited to a barbeque and meetup at Southbank this Sunday (26 June). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Brisbane. Hope to see you there! (speak to me)
(this automated message was delivered using Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser to all users in Category:Wikipedians in Brisbane) | 0 |
Even the actual Melungeon people have been banned for trying to add the correct information. The two people who worked to create this page are not even allowed to edit it anymore | 0 |
"
Ahh the same Fred Bauder that gave an unbiased ruling in the abuses of Humus Sapiens arbitration case. Your presence here certainly explains the name-calling statements you made in the ruling. That particular part of Lebanon is now in control of the Israel gov't again, so timing makes it an auspicious time for you to make your incorrect assertion. Additionally the ""massacre"" is connected to the State of Israel through its army, its Generals, and its future Prime Minister. I am restoring the POV deletion that attempts to cover up the ""massacre."" as it was clearly explained and you have cited no facts to show how Israel was not involved through Ariel Sharon and the IDF in the incident.
Systemic Bias
Criticisms of individual organizations should go on the pages for those organizations. As it stands there is more material about Sudan and Alan Dershowitz carrying on than about the actual human rights information on Israel.
The POV tag is inappropriate as the entire article is just a stub that is not even mostly written at this point. The introduction is about Israel, but the article heading is not. That information is already covered in the article. We only need a brief introduction to familiarize the reader with the context." | 0 |
Shipwrecked
Is it really still on? | 0 |
December 2006 (UTC)
12:14, 27 | 0 |
Image:Sue'sBrain.jpg
Hi! This is a lovely image... I've just got a couple of queries about its source and copyright status. The image doesn't have good sourcing at the moment (as in: did you scan it from a particular book? or upload it from a particular URL?) and if the Field Museum are the copyright-holders, this should probably be made clearer (it's not obvious whether they are merely the host and source of the image, or the copyright holder). In addition, adding some evidence that the image is available under a creative commons license is really pretty important, not because I'm assuming that it isn't and you're wrong in classifying it as such, but because there are loads of images with daft or deceptive copyright statuses uploaded and a requirement of providing some evidence that rights have been released is near essential. Hope this helps - the image is a nice find, and I would hate to see it getting deleted! | 0 |
Your statement that she has “refused to talk about the matter all together” is patently false. In response to a T.V. show host’s question “How are you responding to the rumors about you and Eddie Cibrian,” Leann replied “You know what, everything is so not black and white.” And on another show (Regis and Kelly), the same response: “Everything people read is not… it’s not as easy as black and white.” Also noteworthy is her statement on her blog that “This is a difficult time for me and my loved ones” –again with a complete absence of any denial of the affair. No one has seriously argued that it was not her or Eddie in the video, and I submit that any attempt to do so would simply call into question either the arguer’s intelligence (cf. Moon landing hoax), or else his or her neutrality. But really none of this matters, because – as I said – I completely agree with you that this is currently not Wikipedia material. This is not to say, of course, that it won’t become Wikipedia material. I’m not going to lecture you on what might cause this to become Wikipedia material, because – assuming that you’re as experienced an editor as you say you are – you will already know. Suffice it to say, however, that there are myriad entries of affairs on Wikipedia profiles, and even a cursory look at any of them sheds light on some common features of all. I am sorry if I offended you by calling into question your neutrality. As Wikipedians, we should all strive toward verifiability and away from bias. In keeping with these tenants, I can guarantee you that if this affair rises to the level of verifiability and importance, both in terms of mainstream media attention and cultural impact, that warrants inclusion, I will not be alone in fulfilling my duty as a responsible Wikipedian to support inclusion of said affair. Best, J.M. | 0 |
"
First sentence
the very first sentence claims Carr to be a Marxist and cites Ticktin for that purpose. If one reads Ticktin however, will find this (pg 154): ""One can only conclude that Carr was sympathetic to Marxism but was not a Marxist. He chronicled Marxism but did not fully understand it"". I think the source is seriously misinterpreted in the current version of the article." | 0 |
Even though you're an anonymous stranger on the internet, it made me a little sad to read that you find that tiny joke 'epic'. Ben Hur, it's not. Also, it's 'goveRnator'99.164.68.102 | 0 |
"As Drew often points out on the show....""you say the fact that you were abused has nothing to do with your problem, yet somehow I was able to figure out that you were abused after talking to you for 10 seconds."" It's not magic, it's playing the percentages based on a good knowledge of medical research and personal experience treating people.
" | 0 |
"
See WP:ADMINACCT: ""Breach of basic policies (attacks, biting/civility, edit warring, privacy""
Failure to communicate – this can be either to users (e.g., lack of suitable warnings or explanations of actions), or to concerns of the community (especially when explanations or other serious comments are sought).
Have a nice day. " | 0 |
"
""et"" = ""see that's how you get"" cf. EnglishJerk " | 0 |
"==Regarding edits made during September 12 2006==
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. (talk) " | 0 |
AfD nomination of Horse Isle (game)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Horse Isle (game), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Horse Isle (game). Thank you. | 0 |
OK, you've been advised. The next time you edit a user page other than your own, it will be treated as vandalism and you will be blocked. ∇∆∇∆ | 0 |
Perhaps someone would like to incorporate the following:
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3389481,00.html | 0 |
i think these moroninc admins need some good spankings , they dont own wikipedia , if they cant contribute they must not disrupt the edits prepared by the other users | 0 |
Less than acceptable intelligence | 0 |
I don't believe we should merge these pages...CDP's are completely seperate entities in discussion from military instalations and should be treated as such. | 0 |
I can't even plead my case as it was closed before I was able to make a contribution. | 0 |
" —Gamer
Platipig
Why was this page marked for deletion? JimmyOne
I marked Platipig for G3 for the following reasons, in reverse order for some reason:
The log shows that it's already been deleted for G3.
, the article's creator, has a record of creating unconstructive pages.
A quick google search made it clear that Platipigs don't exist. If it existed, there would be large amounts of news coverage, due to the discovery of a new species of Platypus-Pig hybrid.
That answer your question at all? —Gamer
Yeah, Mistake on my part I reverted the removal of the tag and the page was deleted. That result I found on Google was a blog which is not good enough. My Apologies, JimmyOne
No problem, I was bored anyways and I enjoy answering questions. —Gamer
Thermometer
hey stop vandalising my fun on thermometer dude its just fun we dont mean to destroy the universe or anything we're just on crack atm. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.196.145.72
Image deletion
Strictly speaking, that image probably doesn't fit any speedy deletion criterion, although some may find it qualified under a more liberal interpretation of the CSD. My main justification for the deletion was a mixture of Ignore All Rules and the Snowball clause. To answer your question, you would – in all likelihood – not have been able to tag that image for speedy deletion and have an administrator that was judiciously following the criteria delete it. The safest bet in the future would be to list such images at FfD, where they will be deleted when the time is over (perhaps sooner, as in this case). ÷seresin
I was watching your talk page, you know. Anyways, that answers my question. Happy editing. —Gamer
A Barnstar
For your quick save on the article Coast Guard this 27th day of May, 2009. It was definitely a righteous bust. I wish we didn't have to spend the time we do correcting anonymous posters vandalism. Thanks again for your help.
Ironically, if we didn't have vandals, I'd be out of a job here. Thanks. —Gamer
Newgrounds
I like and totally support your work on NG.
Thanks, but I don't think I'm doing nearly as good a job as I should be. Content writing doesn't seem to be my strong point. You're doing well, too; the encyclopedia (in my opinion) needs good writers more than it needs good vandal fighters. —Gamer
Difference between G1 and G3
Hi there LegendGamer, nice work with NPP. Just saw you make a slight mistake at Matias trinidad, while the page does meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you used G1 which doesn't apply. G1 refers to a page which is pure gibberish (i.e. a random string of letters such | 0 |
Dyke fingerer here. I appreciate the Ritter Sport, and as it happens hazelnut is my favorite. I once left my bicycle outside and did some recreational drugs. Next minute, bike gone. I explained my reasons for the block; the long prose narrative on why the editor's edits were right doesn't make me change my mind. ANEW refers to the Edit Warring Notice Board. The editor is free to make a formal unblock request, and perhaps the next admin feels differently, though I don't see why. | 0 |
Changed importance level
Just though I would let you know I changed the importance rating to the R. L. Stine article for the Children's literature project from high to top as R. L. Stine is considered the #1 bestselling children's author in history, beating J. k. Rowling and Dr. Seuss, so I figure he'd be of top importance to the project. If you disagree with this importance rating, let me know. Thanks. | 0 |
...Justify it. I dont understand what I did..? | 0 |
Thanks for the advice.
Thanks for your advice. I am being bullied and I simply want my account changed or terminated. I am being followed and harrassed by an admin and I have had enough of this. I really dont know what to do... | 0 |
"
Request for Rollbacker permission
I have had difficulty with other Administrators in the past requesting the permission to use the Rollbacker feature, as they seem to be searching for ""Administrator like"" behavior. Please, could somebody of your status and ability please independently research my commitment to vandal fighting, and why I would like this tool to help be more transparent? I use the revert feature constantly, and tools I use like Twinkle would be so much more effective if I had access to this. I assure you that I do act responsibly and always have in all aspects of the project, with some mild errors in my communications skills along the way that I feel I have correctly resolved. And I do thoroughly understand the ramifications and purposes of the tool, and I know the consequences of using it incorrectly.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
(Erik)" | 0 |
I'm back...
...I haven't found the rusty knife yet, but I'm working on it. Now, I believe we have matters to discuss. Like wtf do you think you are playing at?!?! 217.41.238.156 | 0 |
That's not the point. I had made the claim that prefixes like these did not take en dashes, and Anderson objected. It turns out he was correct: they do, at least in (some) texts which use disjunctive dashes. I suspect that this may not be as common as en dashes with independent words, but that would be OR. Since you have no RS for saying they don't, we shouldn't change the MOS to say they don't. — | 0 |
"
Google translation of Portuguese article 1996 YearbookAlbino Mhelembe one Mozambican who worked in the mines of Johannesburg in 1925 , in South Africa , got to know the good news of God's Kingdom . The seeds took root in his heart and soon he was baptized . Returning to his home, he went to preach to members of his former church of the Swiss Mission in village Luisa (now Maracuene), in the most southern province of Mozambique . These Africans newly interested were very zealous and often traveled 30 km to reach the meetings . They formed groups, including in Lourenço Marques , now Maputo .
It was in that year that Albino Mhelembe, a Mozambican working in the mines of Johannesburg, South Africa, heard the good news of God’s Kingdom. The seeds of Kingdom truth took root in his heart, and soon he got baptized. Returning home, he began to preach to the members of his former church, the Swiss Mission, in Vila Luísa (presently Marracuene), in the southernmost province of Mozambique. The newly interested Africans were very zealous and often traveled 20 miles [30 km] to get to meetings. New groups were started, including one in Lourenço Marques, now Maputo.
" | 0 |
That can equally be said of ‘ñ’ and ‘ç’; however, once one learns what functions the tilde and the cedilla serve, they become pronunciatory aids to show that words like “piñata” and “façade” are pronounced as (or, more usually, ) and (or ) — and not as and (or ). As I said, the functions of the ʻokina, tilde, and cedilla could all be learnt very quickly by those who are unfamiliar therewith. Just because a character is only ever found in borrowed terms does not mean that it cannot function as a pronunciatory aid. | 0 |
"
Oops! Sorry. You'll have to choose a new username. Having a username the same as a company gives the impression that yours is a shared account or represents the company. Shared accounts are not allowed. You can create a new username by logging out and then clicking on ""Create account"". —EncMstr (talk) " | 0 |
"==Changed ""Chinese run pawnshops"" to ""pawnshops""==
To call pawnshops, that fence stolen goods, ""Chinese run"" is a primitive form of relative Orientalism: it attempts to re-present the homegrown crime as somehow from abroad, from an ""orient"", here China. The fact is that sinoThai are Thai in the modern sense, not ""Chinese"" unto the next generation, and no more likely to be crooks than Tai people.
" | 0 |
Dizzy
Please, try again when you're fully waked up and not under the effect of psychotropics (or of its abstinence). | 0 |
, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
I understand 19:09 | 0 |
There's been plenty of discussion about it, and there's really no consensus (and more importantly no sources) to say that Leet is a language at all, much less an artificial language (whatever it is, it isn't artificial). I'm a bit doubtful about using the lang template. (Talk) | 0 |
question above.
[edit]
How do I change my username?
See Wikipedia:Changing username.
[edit]
Who owns Wikipedia?
See who owns Wikipedia. | 0 |
Business Operations Expansion
I would like to expand this article with more detail regarding Visa¹s business operations, including info about the VisaNet information processing network, payment platforms and technology, and mobile payments and data security. I am going to pull appropriate third-party sources to support this information prior to posting. | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.