text stringlengths 1 29.3k ⌀ | label float64 0 1 |
|---|---|
" February 2007 (UTC)
That's for me to know -) And since you released that image on a public forum without issuing any sort of copyright with the images, your current claim of ""potential copyvio"" is suspicious. I suggest if you want to protect your images, you stop releasing them without ""suitable licenses"" on public forums -) talk-email 07:23, 13" | 0 |
Bo Guagua
is he not her only son? why are you vandalizating the page? go read that article, and see if it is true or not. | 0 |
"
Perhaps this will help? http://developers.facebook.com/news.php?blog=1&story;=246 ~~ [t - c] " | 0 |
Thanks for your contributions, and thanks for giving edit summaries: if you look at the article history now, you'll see it's much more convenient and accessible. However, I have to tell you that this website does not count as a reliable source per our standards, and if you really want to improve the article you should replace that link wherever possible with reliable sources. Thanks, | 0 |
Or at least review the timing of Moreschi's obscene haste and agree that I had no way of seeing it before he acted. | 0 |
Trying to move a monument with buried soldiers under it is disgraceful! | 0 |
Dynamic Submission
This article just came out of deletion review and I was fixing it as per request. The completed article is here: akc9000/backup it is from a neutral point of view and is not spam. It just explains what it is and what products like it do.
It is noteable since it won an award and is referenced in books. Please look at the fininished article and let me know. Plus, I thought you were suppose to leave a note on my talk page before you delete it. I put the hangon tag.
Please advise | 0 |
2013 (UTC)
You never gave me your opinion of my collaborators on the above. Also, for the record, can you give me an opinion on whether involvement was heavy enough in Columbian Lodge No. 7 Free and Accepted Masons for FOUR recognition. (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:23, 1 September | 0 |
It is also getting old when I've got a guy like Bbb23 going through my stuff and haxing it for no good reason but simple vindictiveness. Why do you say the stuff about Aguilera being solely for people interested in that part is bad? Some people come to read up on her songs. Some don't give a shit about that, but want to know where and how she grew up. And some are going to be wondering how she got caught up in a hacker scandel and why the US Govt wants to give her $7500 in case. Not evenone how comes to an article is there for the entire article. Who the hell is this so-called 'encyclopedia' written before by the masses of people who are interested in extremely diverse stuff?? This encyclopedia is not being written for the sole purpose of Kww and meat puppet BB23 and others. Did you ever stop and think about that for a moment? And do you wonder why it is each year that the number of editors here has gone down by tens of thousands? http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125893981183759969.html And why do you tink it is that women never come here to edit on Wikipedia? http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/31/business/media/31link.html?_r=1
And the amount of new editors who quit after just a few months is in the tens of thousands. Why do you think that is? No one wants to be surrounded by a bunch of jerk who only want everything to run their way or the highway. Is your rank higher than mine? Do you get paid more than me for this? No. But guys like you two are what makes this place suck so bad and it is just not any fun. http://articles.businessinsider.com/2009-11-23/tech/30012937_1_new-editors-jimmy-wales-wikipedia | 0 |
Jose Baez and your confusion about his birth place
I just have to ask you where do you come off deciding for Jose Baez that he was born in Puerto Rico? Are you an editor that chooses places of birth and facts about people that you choose yourself?
Jose Baez was NOT born in Puerto Rico. Jose Baez was born in New York, New York. Next time, oh wise one with no reading comprehension or knows how to read or listen carefully to a cited source. Check your sources! He was born in NY, NY. Get over it!65.8.153.6 | 0 |
Monuments
Isn't there a memorial to the Balibo five, or at least one of them? | 0 |
future tense
This article has a lot of saying that such-and-such will happen. Aside from the fact that we cannot predict with certainty whether the work will be successfully completed as planned, it is also a maintenance headache because it means that even if everything does go to plan, the article will need constant revisiting to change future to past tenses at the right time. I think it is better to talk about what was proposed in the past (a completed event that we can report on) than what will happen in the future. I've changed a couple of bits but there is more to do. Thanks. | 0 |
He's been around, he vandalized my RfA a few times. I should tell him about some of the info that the admins at SoCal are feeding me, I hear there's some folks at his ISP very interested in Mr. Barber. Wouldn't that be the ultimate kicker? | 0 |
List of hop types on Hops
Hi Steve, I've moved the list of hop types off the article page onto the discussion page for reasons described at Talk:Hops. Can you come over and comment on the source of this list? I'm worried it may have copyright problems. Cheers. | 0 |
"
I have now taken the time to read the entry reverted above. You wrote an opinion piece in the first person in the middle of that article. If you have the scientific background that you state you should know that this is entirely inappropriate for an encyclopaedia. Articles here are not first person presentations or lectures given by an editor to the assembled populace. Please try to understand this place. If you don't work at it I predict that you will continue not to enjoy editing here. That would be a shame because I see you as an energetic and valuable editor once you learn the trick to it. Is there any help I can offer you? Faddle " | 0 |
Shared IP
This is a shared IP address, please stop being so mellodramatic. If you want to stop vandalism you ned to be more targeted and cannot blanket ban this range as many many many users are connected to it. The last time there was a ban some idiot decided to block account creation from this address aswell, now that is stupid and must not happen again if some buffoon is to impose a range block on the 99% of people using this address constructivly.212.183.134.130 | 0 |
"
Harrassment
I'm not really interested in your further attempts at harrassment. You have made it clear that you will not discourse on the contention between us. Citing your interpretations of rules and nothing more is not constructive. I find it difficult for you to wonder why I haven't been particularly friendly to your continual removal of the comparison table. control " | 0 |
Re the red links in Chesham - they are there for a reason, to encourage people to create articles on the subjects that they are related to. Please stop removing them. | 0 |
Ivan Alexander of Bulgaria FAC
Hi! Today I've nominated the article Ivan Alexander of Bulgaria for a featured article, believing it meets all criteria.
This is the article's third nomination (see the previous ones), and because the previous ones received relatively little attention, I'd like to invite you to voice your opinion about it, be it as a vote or a comment, on the article's nomination page.
Thanks! ) → | 0 |
User-Talkpage Rights
Jossi You Are Clearly In Violation Of User Talkpage Rights And If You Continue Your Vandalism You Will Be Blocked For An Indefinite Time. | 0 |
"40, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Text and tables are two seperate entities within an article. There is no externeous bolding in the article text. Bolding in tables is not covered in WP:BOLD. In fact bolding is built into tables, with the ! starting field which not only automatically bolds the text, but also changes the color of that cell to a darker shade of grey.
WP:IAR can be applied to anything. The ""rules"" you mentioned above are not rules, they are guides. There are not requirements.
As for ring of fire experiences, you should see it from our perspective. You seem to be quite adament that ""breaking rules"" when it comes to edit warring is justifiable, so I'm not sure where you're coming from with saying that methods of style, which are inherently not rules, cannot be broken in this specific article. (Talk) 06:" | 0 |
I did not say Goth Metal I said Goth Rock and I will point out that Evanescence has nothing to do with Gothic metal nor Goth Rock. They fall more into the Alternative rock/metal genre. There sound has nothing to do with Goth Rock. So I'm not going to take much from Gregor Mackintosh's interview. Yes Evanescence is big but to place them in with real Goth Rock band or real Gothic Metal band is a slap in the face to those bands.98.224.211.86 | 0 |
This is the VERY hand uses to molest your children! | 0 |
"
Can you or another experienced editor help then. this is ridiculous all this guy is doing is assuming bad faith, nothing i say or do can change that all he wants to do is throw bad faith accusations. I would also like to see if you have a chnce where i do not have that authority from what i have read i do as long as it is used properly.HellinaBucket (talk)
Never mind i see but this is getting out of hand. do something about it.HellinaBucket (talk) \
Does this look like a wikibreak?
HellinaBucket, leave me alone. I'm not editing the Operation Repo article (or any article) any longer, you have no reason to contact me, or ask anyone else to contact me on your behalf. The way that I met you was by catching you in the act of vandalism, and your initial response was to repeat the vandalism. It's true that you were able to get me angry enough for Orangemike to feel that I deserved a mild warning, but don't let that embolden you. The fact that you have abstained from vandalism for a few days, does not mean that you are not a vandal, and your taking offense to my using the word vandal in reference to you is unwarranted, such use does not constitute a personal attack. You are a vandal. You committed vandalism, you repeated that vandalism, and it's only been a few days since then; it doesn't wear off that quickly. I would not do this exactly the same way if I had it to do over again, but my goal was to stop you, and everyone else, from vandalizing the Operation Repo article, I feel confident that I have succeed, and I feel that the allegations of me over-stepping the guidelines in my ferocity of dealing with you are both mild and debatable. It is an added bonus, that it seems you have chosen to become a responsible editor, and I, once again, thank-you for all of the things you do which make you an effective editor. HellinaBucket, your account is only a month old, why don't you just throw it away and make a new one? There's nothing wrong with that as long as you honestly intend to be a responsible editor from here on out (If you want to be extra careful that you are following the guidelines to the letter, read WP:SOCK, but the basic idea, is that making a second account is wrong if you are doing for it the wrong reasons. If you just want to change your name, or if you are embarrassed about something you did as a beginning editor that you are not going to do again, then that's fine.). Whether or not you get a new account, there is no reason for you to contact me. I began editing Operation Repo while I was checking the recent changes for vandals. I continued to monitor it because the vandalism had been common before I was able to get the article protected. Other than that I have no interest in that subject.VegKilla (talk) HellinaBucket (talk)
That would be the fourth or fifth time he has accused me of creating a new ACCT. BAD FAUTH AND PERSONAL ATTACKS. THAT IS CRAPHellinaBucket (talk)
I'm trying to enjoy my vacation, but I couldn't resist pointing out that Anden is a brand new user. The ""over the top"" language above could be Hellina arguing with themself or it could be anyone. Personally, I do not trust anyone trying to edit this article who created their account after the article was protected. Also, the first sentence of the article has issues with tense.VegKilla (talk)
I adamatly deny HellinaBucket's allegations of me ""still directing personal attacks."" The only thing HellinaBucket said above that was true is that I have respect for Orangemike's opinion, and I have no respect for HellinaBucket's warnings because not only did HellinaBucket initially leave me a level 4 warning (skipping levels 1-3), but also I meet HellinaBucket by catching them in the act of vandalism (I don't think anyone would respect warnings left by a 20-day old account who is responding to being warned for vandalism, came close to violating the three-revert-rule, and is skipping the first 3 warnings).VegKilla (talk) (THIS VANDALISM WAS BRINGING THE ARTICLE WITHIN THE STANDARDS OF WIKIPEDIA BTW.HellinaBucket (talk)
First accusied me of vandalising a page because i removed uncited material. then he accused me of bad faith severaltimes and sock puppetry, all this harrasmentr has happened and i did tery the approppriate ways warnings etc and all the user does is continue personal attacks. " | 0 |
BoothyBoy you are wrong, as heard on the wonderful Opie and Anthony Show on XM 202, the leading provider of Satellite Radio, Howard Stern will not have any rights to his old show, it is something that is and was non-negotiable. The great inventor must steal some more ideas from Greg and Tony. | 0 |
, disagreement is not an attack.
, disagreement is not an attack.
But, I understand that you see any disagreement as an attack. I fully understand that. Your types are hard-wired like that. It is impossible for you to see a disagreement as simply that: a disagreement. No, you see it as an attack. I understand. You are like that. And nothing can change you. That is why you see a disagreement as edit-warring too. You have a wild imagination. And here on Wikipedia you can abuse other editors as you like and as you do. That actually makes Wikipedia what it is. So, keep up your abuse. Wikipedia needs editors like you and Ladislav Mecir to abuse good-faith editors. | 0 |
Craig Anton
Please see Help:editing. | 0 |
"
I definitely did revert more than 3 times in 24 hours, (I haven't slept and have lost track of the hours) and for that I do indeed feel foolish and apologize. My intentions were honourable, involving the restoration of more than 4,000 bytes of material repeatedly deleted by , in an attempt at preserving the integrity of the article Flying checkpoints. Though I am tempted to ask for an unblock so that I can work on other articles in dire need of attention, there is no question that I have violated the letter of 3RR. And so I accept my punishment with thanks, hopefully get some sleep, and look forward to cooler heads and fresh eyes prevailing sometime in the near future. ) Again, my apologies. " | 0 |
Fried Chickens
Is dat sum fried chickens? | 0 |
November 2008
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings. | 0 |
"
If you are unable to comprehend the meaning of the words you actually wrote, that is not my problem. How is""when anything not forbidden is mandatory"" (the words I cited you as saying) any different from the phrase ""Anything not forbidden is mandatory."" (the words you just now cite yourself as having said? I see no difference. And further, how is ""anything not forbidden is allowed"" (the phrase I cited you as saying) any different from "" anything not forbidden is allowed (the words you now cite yourself as having said)? I see no difference. I have quoted you exactly. Your continued assertion that I have repeatedly misquoted is slanderous. If you continue in this vein, I will be resorting to Wikipedia conflict resolution efforts.
Your equation of ""allowed"" with ""mandatory is implied in the question: isn't ""A"" another way of saying ""B"". ""When you then add (only more so; it is inevitable!)"" as a further clarification of ""B""; and your clarification of ""B"" is an exact meaning of ""A"", you are in fact equating ""A"" (mandatory) with ""B"" (inevitable). It is a logical error of equivocation when a word which can, under some circumstances and under some conditions, mean the the same as some other specified word, is arbitrarily employed as a substitute for that other specified word. This is an equivocation you continue to make with the word ""try"", which has validity when applied to natural phenomena only in a metaphoric sense, which is a usage disallowed in logic and science. I provided you with a dictionary definition of the word ""try"" which includes ""volition"", which ""Nature"" clearly does not have. Your statement that ""I also suspect the scenario was presented to us students just to make us think"" implies an awareness on your part that the case was hypothetical, which indicates that the uses of the word ""try"" (and effort with an implication of volition) was not meant literally. Need I remind you that half remembered arguments from long forgotten books (and/or lectures) does not count for evidence? The fact that the word ""try"" includes the meaning ""effort"" does not mean that these two words can be arbitrarily substituted one for the other. To make such substitution without providing a case for its validity in the specific case at hand is to commit the logical fallacy of equivocation, especially when the equivocation is being employed as a means of proving that something which can be true is true. In these cases, equivocation is also the logical fallacy of question begging. As previously mentioned, the concept ""Anything not forbidden is allowed"" has a long pedigree in various legal fields, such as - but not limited to and without prejudice - Judaism and English common law. I suggest you familiarize yourself with these arguments before continuing our current discussion.
I have no need to address your blastocyst example, as it is a subset of ""Nature"". (i would not go down this road if i were you. If the blastocyst can be shown to have volition, it can be shown to have personhood) It is therefore covered under the general declaration ""Nature"" has no volition"", variants of which I have repeatedly made, and therefore does not ""try'. Unless you are going to try to prove that a blastocyst has volition, your example has been dealt with. I will not address each and every example of natural phenomena ""trying"" anything, except to the extent that naturally occurring sentient beings have volition. The salient feature of naturally occurring reasonable sentient beings is the fact that we are able to self-consciously intervene directly in the chain of cause and effect which governs the existence of all other natural phenomena. That is why man made laws exist in a category discrete from natural laws, and why applying laws found in natural philosophy (now known as science) to man made laws such as rights is a category error. Feynman himself, upon whose argument you rely, recognizes this. When he states that social science is pseudo-science and not science, he is placing the two phenomena into different, largely irreconcilable, categories. He denies outright that social sciences have discovered any testable laws. Your entire case rests on this category error, on your equivocation error in your use of the word ""try"", and in your equivocation error in your uses of the words ""mandatory"" and ""allowed"". You have no case; and, at this point, you are beginning to look like a troll rather than a good faith debater. i will not go round this mulberry bush with you much longer.
The fact that we have a general ""right to make an effort"" does not mean we have a right to build a perpetual-motion machine. A case could be made that the term ""perpetual-motion machine"" is meaningless, as it has such little relation to reality as to be meaningless. I have no knowledge of the technicalities on this point, and am trusting prev | 0 |
We'd need some reliable sources. I could be mistaken, but I recall that the Croats as a whole didn't have a reputation for being particularly tall; rather, it was the people inhabiting the Istria part of Croatia who were tall. ~ | 0 |
"
my edit on saddam
i suspect if it had been on george bush, it would not have constituted vandilism ""sarcasm""" | 0 |
"
OK, i added three flags of Kingdom of Yugoslavia in the gallery. Maybe one more should be added, but we can do that later. Also, this article need reorganization, to show much easier that two main Yugoslavia's existed, out of 4. speaks " | 0 |
"
Like it says at the top of the page, ""If you're not already familiar with Wikipedia policies, particularly those regarding verifiability, neutral point of view and no original research, please consider carefully studying those policies before commenting here."" " | 0 |
Parli and Mace Distinction
The article attempts to distinguish British Parliamentary and Mace formats on the premise that the British Schools' Mace competitions follows a different format (which I believe it does). The article goes on to outline a Mace format which is identical to the British Parliamentary (or World Universities Debating Championship) format. This is accurate too. As I understand it Mace is not one unified format, more a unified style practised over a few formats. For example, the John Smith Memorial Mace competition run by the English Speaking Union (who are also the organisers of the school competition mentioned) is conducted in British Parliamentary format which is described under the Mace sub-section. If there are no changes and no objections when next I return I will remedy, though that may not be soon. 86.40.153.3 | 0 |
I am sick of you saying I am a vandal. | 0 |
FIDESZ-MPP = Liberal Conservative? My foot! Nationalists...without a doubt. | 0 |
, wiki doesn't need your vandalism | 0 |
DreamGuy
Someone has accused of being in violation of sock protocol. DreamGuy will need your assisstance. | 0 |
Indonesia
I might have done it anonymously I often do. I went back through my posts and came to the same conclusion. When I have time I'll revisit it. | 0 |
Sorry
Chief. I didn't mean to attack your queef. | 0 |
"
Notice
I will be busy all weekend, and won't be around much. Stalkers: I would be grateful if you would stalk.
" | 0 |
sorry, but I dont see where there are any more legal threats towards wik as I never made any? The truth is here the matter is look at what this guy did with my pic after seeimng it on wik. he has made me a target.
http://marcelthemaoist.blogspot.com/2008/03/merle-terlesky.html
he is a radical communist that has targeted me. Hence my point. I never had any intention of suing WIK at all. | 0 |
The City of Victoria was the norminal capital of Hong Kong. (legal definition). In early days, it meant the urban area of Hong Kong. As Hong Kong expanded quickly, the boundary of the City of Victoria means nothing. Nowadays, it is only used by some organisations with long history. | 0 |
True, but that doesn't warrant the removal of the paragraph. I've restored it and added an appropriate tag whilst I find some references to back up the assertion. | 0 |
Okay no problem! Greetings, | 0 |
You know...
Beeblebrox, you really need to learn to chill. It's not like other peoples' opinions are going to disappear, just because you're Grand Poobah or something. 68.240.150.91 | 0 |
Yes. I understand your point. Thanks for your work. I think the biggest bit of the stage to writing a full article is actually creating it. It is better to have a short stub with references, rather than nothing yes. | 0 |
"
The GAME Christmas Tinner hoax
There seems to be a hoax product on the GAME website, ""The GAME Christmas Tinner"", that alleges to be a complete Christmas dinner in a can. There are even competitors, one with a ""Christmas dinner in a can"" that supposedly self-heats. The GAME page is currently marked ""SOLD OUT"" until 2014. There are no credible consumer reviews of this alleged product on the Web, or even evidence that anyone has successfully purchased one.
It is currently WP:Original Research that this is a hoax, but the graphics designer (Chris Godfrey) shows a clearly fake ""12 course meal"" on his website.
This seems to be 'viral' marketing for GAME, but it could also be marketing for Chris Godfrey. (talk) " | 0 |
"
(And yes, I know I have brought up logical arguments in the past, like ""they can leave, so they aren't incorporated"" or what not. But those took a backseat to the sourcing, which I've clearly made it a point to ask for lately, sourcing which has not been supplied.) " | 0 |
Same request goes for if you could quote it. | 0 |
", 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Thanks Tan, but again, I did have a reliable third-party source. I realize it wasn't a major one. However, instead of a speedy delete, you could have said, ""Hey David, your article needs a more mainstream source or I will have to remove it,"" rather than deleting my couple hours work in less than a minute. It was a good thing I had a backup. 16:36" | 0 |
You hit all the points Gilles. 188.223.226.180 | 0 |
")
From what I've read (I've never tried it), you can still hear some of the words, but not as well. cιτγ 01:23, 12 October 2006 (UTC" | 0 |
I fap to this
Just thought everyone should know, I fap to this stuff. 124.188.70.214 | 0 |
"
Hey listen folks, whatever. I believe that a non-computer example will be the key to understanding this concept for some. Both of the articles content addressable memory, as well as this one state that they are forms of ""computer"" memory. That just is not the case in principle. In principle, the index card is also an example, and an excellent one at that. My guess is, that others with a bigger investment in the article will have their way with it. Please keep in mind that there is a world beyond computers for many of these computing concepts as you do so. Be well, " | 0 |
Opinion
I don't like you very much | 0 |
could you take a look at Natural units? it appears that you have made some contribution there. i do have a couple of objections that noted at the talk page. i don't think that the Planck Current is either historically correct nor keeping with the original concept of Planck Units. personally i wish that Planck had normalized 4*pi*G instead of just G, but that is a different (and later) argument.
(talk page) | 0 |
Is it correct to say that New Zealand English contains many words from Maori? There are many place and bird names from the Maori language used, but I've heard of very few everyday words from Maori being used in everyday English. | 0 |
He'd better stop it... BTW, how do you like the Melano Supriatna-article? | 0 |
"
Rfc/user for Shashwat pandey
Dear Jossi,
Users Sethie and Reneeholle have filed an Rfc for user Shashwat pandey.
Because you have contributed to either the Sahaj Marg page, the Shri Ram Chandra Mission page, or both, we would appreciate it if you could provide your comments of this user at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Shashwat_pandey
Here are the guidelines for responding
Other users can endorse a view (under 1.7), by adding their signature to the list after that view. Along with their signature, they may wish to offer a clarifying comment of one or two sentences, for example if they agree with all but one particular part of the view. Longer responses than that should probably go into their own ""View"" section.
Anyone can endorse any view, regardless of whether or not they are outside parties, inside parties, or even the subject of the RfC. Ideally, there will be some view(s) that both sides of the involved parties can endorse.
You may endorse as many views as you wish. You may also endorse the original RfC statement (under section 1.7), and/or the subject's response (under section 2).
Thank you for your time. It is greatly appreciated! " | 0 |
"
January 2010
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, SenBeach, may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because Matches the name of NJ State Senator James Beach. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may file for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account and use that for editing. Thank you. Gespräch " | 0 |
"
Now you are being even more abusive, and you are starting to give me concern that might lead me to take this dispute further. The fact is that you seem to have misunderstood the NPOV policy. I refer you to the NPOV page which states:
Articles without bias describe debates fairly rather than advocating any side of the debate.
Citing newspaper articles has no relevance here. Your edits would have the effect of advocating one side of the debate; that is why they were unacceptable. The statement ""It is hardly POV to tell the truth"" begs the question over what the truth is. It is a true statement of the facts that the Hutton report was criticized by opponents of the war. It is not any statement of facts that Hutton was a 'whitewash': it is a statement of opinion. I honestly hope you are able to tell the difference between the two. 17:29, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)" | 0 |
"::Ok I added the change suggested. I guess a section ""real-world systems vs. abstract systems"" can be added to the ""types of systems"" chapter. Would you like to give it a try?
" | 0 |
Shared account
You admitted that the account is shared by some people. I am noting that this is not permitted per the Wikipedia policy WP:ROLE. Please designate only one person to operate this account. Thank you. | 0 |
Ship decom articles
I appreciate your desire to help with the decom articles, but I don't think we should be so quick to merge the lists. I was perhaps too strong worded in my initial response on my page, and I hope you won't take it wrong, but I do believe firmly that the yearly listings will have sufficient entries to warrant their maintenance as is. Having to break them up along the way presents a host of problems and extra work. | 0 |
How are you gentleman?
Happy Easter, love Johnny! Don't deny yourself or me anymore! | 0 |
You can read more about smart ways to research stuff on the web at WP:Search Engine Test. Don't hesitate to ask if you have further questions, I'd be glad to help. | 0 |
I have been investigating this thoroughly, there was one news that got out and on that one day only. That was a whole year ago... there have been no follow up stories done, there is no news about this. This seems like a pure case of controversy created to use the name of this person. If the news sources are reliable then they need to follow up. Sorry to say Wikipedia is all about proof.. You have proof of a rumour gone bad... but you have no proof of any supporting documentation. The media needs to be more reliable and hence it has proven in this case there is none. After waiting for one year, I have decided to call this a doubtful agenda by the so called haters of this family ! Media needs to follow up and as long as they do not follow up, then this will be removed eventually...where Dirty Dog likes it or not. You play Dirty I guess!
Sonisona | 0 |
:Category:Allegedly anti-Semitic people
They can't delete the Category:Anti-Semitic people so they are trying another tactic !
Your vote is requested: | 0 |
"
It's interesting that you say that as the very first paragraph in MOS (capital letters) states ""Wikipedia's house style avoids unnecessary capitalization; most capitalization is for proper names, acronyms, and initialisms. It may be helpful to consult the style guide on proper names if in doubt about whether a particular item is a proper name."" I think that right about sums up the issue with this article and my issue with excessive and improper use of capital letters. ——TALK—CONTRIBUTIONS
" | 0 |
"
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Pittsford Mendon High School. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. gabsadds " | 0 |
"
(copied from User talk:Devanampriya)
I am not taking issue with the fact that you are removing a language from the page and replacing the ""languages"" blurb with an ""administrative languages"" blurb. What constitutes vandalism is the repeated removal of large sections of text- multiple paragraphs at a time- from sections such as ""Background"". Furthermore, it would be more appropriate to move the two languages you continue to cite to an ""Administrative Languages"" blurb, and include the rest of the languages beneath that in a blurb called, ""Other Languages"", or something to that effect.
Your version of the page removes the following sections from the article in their entirety:
* Background
* Chanakya and Chandragupta Maurya
* Conquest of Magadha
* Emperor Chandragupta
That's why we keep on reverting it. Blanket removal of information from a Wikipedia article constitutes vandalism. You make it sound as though all you are doing is removing Aramaic from the article; this is not the case. If you continue to remove major portions of the article, I will be forced to report you to WP:AIV, which is something I very much do not want to do. Please make the article a collaborative work and stop misleading other editors with your edit summaries. " | 0 |
. the real vandals are mikka and jaysweet, both of them have been using the rules of wikipedia in bad faith to crush viewpoints they do not agree with. you should look into their activities surrounding cannabis culture and how they love to push information they dont agree with into the memory hole. my conduct on his talk page was inappropriate, it was a mistake, but it was made because i am EXTREMELY frustrated at the fact that a person who has openly displayed their bias against a certain subject is trying to use the rules of wikipedia in a way intended to destroy the article on said subject. THIS IS MERELY A MORE SUBTLE FORM OF VANDALISM. one that, in my opinion, is far more damaging than some silly words on a users talk page }} | 0 |
"
My Draft of Kaithal honour killing case
The Kaithal honour killing case is an honour killing of newly-married Manoj Banwala and Babli in June 2007 after a ‘khap panchayat' (caste-based council among Jats) in their Karora village in Kaithal district, Haryana, passed a decree prohibiting marriage against societal norms. Both belonged to the Banwala gotra, a Jat community. Hence, they were declared brother and sister, though not directly related, and their marriage was declared invalid and incestuous. When the couple refused to abide by the ruling and got married, they were abducted and killed by the bride's relatives.
After the verdict of the Khap panchayat, the state government raised no concern. According to Home Minister P. Chidambaram, the UPA-led central government is to propose an amendment to the Indian Penal Code to outlaw honour killings.
In March 2010, a Karnal district court ordered the execution of the five perpetrators in this case, the first time a court in Haryana has ordered justice be served in an honour killing case. The court gave life sentence to the khap head who ordered the killings but did not participate, while the driver in the kidnapping was sentenced to seven years.
Murder
on April 2007.]]
On April 6, 2007, Manoj Banawal, the owner of an electronics repair shop at Kaithal, eloped with Babli, a resident of the same village, to Chandigarh and applied for a registered marriage on May 31, 2007. They secretly married and started living in Karnal. Unhappy with the marriage, Babli's family asked the local khap panchayat to intervene, which dissolved the marriage. Families in Manoj's village were ordered not to talk to the couple. Manoj moved with Babli to another village and asked the police for help, which accompanied them to a Kaithal court on June 15, 2007. The judge ordered police protection for the two.
After the trial, Manoj and Babli, accompanied by police assigned to them for protection, left for Chandigarh. The police left them at Pipli and slipped away.{{cite news|url=http://www.deccanchronicle.com/op-ed/feudal-justice-feudal-crime-034|title=Feudal justice for a feudal crime|last=Sen |first=Antara Dev|date=3 April 2010| | 0 |
A vast improvement from the old, and thanks for your constructive criticisms — it helped me improve. ) | 0 |
"
Deary me, are we still going on about this?♦ Dr. Blofeld " | 0 |
"
Anyone who accuses someone else of violating good faith patently does not understand the good faith policy, as accusing someone else of violating an assumption of good faith is itself a violation of assumption of good faith. Your extremely combative and Wikilawyering response to a simple warning is worrisome. " | 0 |
Something important to note here is that teratomas are usually encapsulated so even if they do contain teeth, they wouldn't be visible as such even at the introitus. | 0 |
Overall a Good Article
Custer was a tricky fellow. He was actively idolized and utterly despised even in his own time. Ironically the people that hate him today for fighting the Native Americans would be on the Grant Administration's side - who hated him for publically defending their rights. As for his competance, that was always open too. Being a balls to the wall aggressive cavalryman doesn't make him a military genius but being so, winning, and surviving is close. And in the end, close isn't always good enough. After Gettysburg he encountered General Longstreet and tried to convince General Lee's stout lieutenant he had him outnumbered and out gunned. He requested Longstreet's surrender in person. Longstreet ordered his staff to bring several Confederate divisions up to attack including General Pickett's. In reality these divisions existed only on paper and Pickett's was crushed at Gettysburg. But Custer bought Longstreet's bluff and retreated with his tail between his legs. | 0 |
I would say the example statement WAS racist, since it generalizes about an individual's future performance based on his or her ethnicity. There are plenty of sub-saharan Africans who do not have superior physical prowess, and even if there are not many great sub-saharan swimmers at the moment, there could be multiple factors bringing that situation about. It used to be said that women weren't good in business or in the visual or musical arts. 212.140.128.142 | 0 |
"
From May 2006 to June 2006
Peer review
I've archived all the previous discussion in preperation for extensive work on this article. Hopefully the peer review can help use on our way to FA status. I'll add my comments about what needs to be done shortly. | ਸੁਖ | Talk
New layout
I think we need a better layout, and this is what I propose (based on other religous pages):
Etymology
Originating from Sanskrit (śiṣya or śikṣā) or Pali (sikkhā).
Beliefs
One god - reference to what god is in Sikh thought, reference the Mul Mantra as underlying the characteristics of God
Thoughts on birth, death, reincarnation, karma - relation to dharmic faiths and crucially how Sikhism differs
Equality of people regardless of race, religion, caste etc,
History
General climate in India at the time
The Sikh gurus; placing special emphasis on Nanak as the founder, and Gobind Singh as the founder of the Khalsa
The Guru Granth Sahib
Influences in Sikhism post-Gurus (famous Sikhs like Banda Bahadur and Ranjit Singh). Including influence of the British, and issue in independent India.
Scripture
Guru Granth Sahib (creation of, layout and content)
Dasam Granth (and controversy)
Janam Sakhis
Other scripture
Khalsa
Sikhs
Five Ks
Punjab and punjabi culture and how it relates to Sikhism
Sikhism in the diaspora
New Sikh converts
Institutions
Places of worship (Gurdwaras)
Harimandir Sahib, Akal Takht (spirtual and temporal - duties of both)
SGPC and other gurdwara administration committees
Sects and groups
Talk about differing groups of Sikhs (including caste distinctions which still persist contrary to Sikh teachings)
Udasis, Nirankaris and others
In addition, we need to get rid of the mass of links at the bottom of the page, as well as the audio files which are not relevant on this page. | ਸੁਖ | Talk
Pictures and Table
I don't see the need in having 2 pictures of men wearing turbans. I think one of them should be replaced by a picture of one of the 5 K's or maybe even a picture of a Guru.
Also, I think the order of the columns in the table containing information about the Gurus needs to be changed. I think all dates should be read in chronological order, which means that the ""Date of Birth"" column should come before the ""Guruship on"" column. This to me is a more logical order.
Yes, I agree with your comments. We'll incorporate your commments in the re-write. The dates of the Gurus also need fact checking and have been flagged for some while. | ਸੁਖ | Talk
Okay, all done. Please check the new picture. | ਸੁਖ | Talk
That is a much better picture, thank you! There is something I am unsure about though and I hope someone can resolve the matter. In that table about the Gurus it says that Guru Nanak received his guruship the day he was born. Is this a widely accepted belief amongst the Sikh community? I ask because I had always thought that Guru Nanak became a Guru the day he emerged from the river Bain and said ""There is neither Hindu nor Muslim..."" and recited the Mool Mantra for the first time. I am not entirely sure though. Am I mistaken to believe this?
It could also be viewed that as there was nobody (well, apart from God I suppose), to pass their guruship onto him, he was a guru since birth. I believe your way of looking at it is definately better and I will change it. By the way, feel free to edit any of the articles on Wikipedia. There are plenty of problems on the Sikhism-related pages and none were really written by scholars. | ਸੁਖ | Talk
Styles
I'm a bit unsure how to proceed with general styling in the article.
Punjabi written in Gurmukhi does not have a complex set of consonant clusters so sometimes the inherent 'a' is dropped without it being indicated in writing. Should we transcribe with or without the 'a'?
Also, when should we transliterate formally or | 0 |
I refer to the last time you brought up this argument. No one agreed with you. That was consensus. Actually, that is not consensus. Please read Wp:CON.
If there are notable allegations that this is state terrorism by the US, then please present your sources, quote the relevant wording, and then we can look at it. You keep making claims but when I ask you to support it, you never do. Why is that? I hope this time it will be different. If you notice above, I did. The UN Charter, Article 1 and the UDHR. The ICJ could have found a violation of either - or both. Please respond. Most importantly, the ICJ never mentioned state terrorism.
Yes, and so what is your point? That Chomsky misrepresented the ICJ finding, so he is not a reliable source. Without one reliable source, there can be no discussion of Nicuragua. | 0 |
Fine start. And I apologize for liberally editing in the beginning while ignorant of the Wikipedia editing protocols.-User-129.85.55.181 | 0 |
"
Speedy deletion of ActiveCollab
A tag has been placed on ActiveCollab requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. " | 0 |
How safe is photo sharing?
There has been a corresponding increase in the number and popularity of
publicly hosted Web sites for sharing digital photos. But is it safe to share
personal photos ? After all, personal photos contain personal information about
you and your family, your interests and hobbies.
Safety in this context means that the personal information, which can be
identified and extracted from these photos, is both private and secure.
Private means that access to the information can be restricted to the use
of a particular person or group of people. The owner of the information
should control who has access to it.
Secure means free from danger and risk of loss, i.e., making sure that the
bad guys out there cannot access your information.
A photo-sharing Web site lets members upload and annotate photos that are
posted on its site.Some sites offer these services for free, while others charge
a fee, sometimes only for additional storage. In general, these sites make
money by charging for prints, cards, and gifts such as calendars or coffee
mugs imprinted with the photos. Members can share their photos by sending
friends and family the URL of their photo site. Sometimes, visitors must enter
a username and password in order to view your pictures. Sometimes, this
information is embedded in the URL. As more people post their pictures online,
others are finding ways to exploit them. | 0 |
Should the infobox include the non-circulating gold coins? I'm not sure. They're going to get awfully big if we include every denomination ever issued. | 0 |
No - 'Commonwealth Realm', even if realm were in lower case, signifies a realm that is in the Commonwealth. That includes the realms like Swaziland and Tonga which are members of the Commonwealth and have a monarch other than Elizabeth II. Also, there is nothing in the term to indicate that Elizabeth II is the common monarch of these realms, and a term should descrtibe what it signifies. Belonging to the Commonwealth is quite incidental to the quality of the realms we are attempting to group. | 0 |
"
Actually... excellent point. That old article really was awful, with lots of peacock terms and didn't actually say much. That said, ""Will"" is used differently in philosophy (some think of it as some active, tangible force rather than simply inclinations, like in idealism); a general definition would probably only say ""Will is"" (as noted by someone on this talk page), so I tried to make it into a long-form disambiguation page. Most people will click on Free Will and be done with it. Do you think that this satisfies the problem? " | 0 |
"
""In that _context_, your references where out of line."" That's not very fair to say that some Englishes are more out of line than others, I have already spent a lot of time on wikipedia revising such rferences, notations and comparisons, most notably on this page. -(" | 0 |
I agree that it doesn't have to be used every time, but the edit eliminated all use of the word 'Dominion' from the article. I think that the use of the title 'Dominion of Canada', to reflect the semi-independent federation of British territories that was Canada in 1885, just once is a good way to disambiguate the 1867-1931 use of 'Canada' from say 'Canada' as a colony in New France, The Province of Canada of 1841-1867, or even our current setup. | 0 |
Bob Dylan edit
I have removed the link you added to this article; the mention of Bob Dylan in the article was quite brief. Links should have direct bearing on the subject article and be largely about the subject of the article. | 0 |
"
tsk tsk ..We lose a lot of Good Editors and Admins this way...Cometstyles " | 0 |
Six Day War
These acts are aggression. Why did Egypt kick out UN forces from the border? Why did Egypt increase military activity along the Egyptian-Israeli border? Why did Egypt create a blockade? Egypt clearly wanted to seek the destruction of Israel as it did during the 1948 Arab-Israeli War. Had Egypt not made these hostile moves, Israel would have no reason to strike. Israel is a small country and when its enemies make hostile moves that may endanger its safety, Israel must move quickly. On a further note, no Egyptian ruler has ever offered peace towards Israel. Israel has always offered peace to Egypt. As a matter of fact, in 1979 Israel gave up the Sinai Peninsula in exchange for peace with Egypt. | 0 |
I misread it; my apologies. | 0 |
"
User:Galactic_Penguin_SST/Space_Shuttle
Hello, you've requested speedy deletion for User:Galactic_Penguin_SST/Space_Shuttle.
This should be requested by using {{db-userreq}} as it is a user page of theirs.
Thanks!
Map " | 0 |
"
Reviews to add
Pasting here for now
http://theearlyregistration.com/2015/03/21/album-review-carrie-lowell-sufjan-stevens/
http://www.thefourohfive.com/review/article/sufjan-stevens-carrie-lowell-142
http://www.fsunews.com/story/entertainment/2015/03/17/sufjanstevens/24902393/
http://www.theverge.com/2015/3/23/8272329/sufjan-stevens-carrie-and-lowell-album-review
—❤T☮C☺M☯ " | 0 |
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/global-tv-crew-kicked-out-of-attawapiskat/article7064254/
Is it possible for one of the editors who support Spence so completely to please, possibly, attempt to work this into the article - it seems rather relevant and was, after all, her decision. Thanks.
24.224.214.165 | 0 |
39, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Look for mediation commission I see no compromise from you. I found you totally biased looking for blaming Polish nation. Andrew 05: | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.