text
stringlengths
1
29.3k
label
float64
0
1
" I reversed out of courtesy, but a potentially problematic BLP with so many deletes generally results in a quick deletion. Best,  (talk) "
0
Mangum As you know, agenda-pushing editors managed to get the page on Crystal Gail Mangum deleted and salted; however, in light of her recent arrest for arson and attempted murder, I think it's time for them to be overruled. I found one version of her name which has not been salted: Crystal G Mangum. So if you want to handle this job, I think that would be great. I don't have the free time to write an article. Also, since those editors probably read this page, you'll have to work fast, as they censor rabidly.
0
June 2012 (UTC)|decline=Moot now that the IP isn't blocked.— foxj 04:01, 19
0
" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Lebron. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. "
0
If it's obviously junk from a website (usually spam...), just Google it. If it's something literary, Google the author. If they were still alive in the last 75 years, just put 'Author still alive' or Author only died in xxxx' as appropriate. On Twinkle, it asks for a source or URL if available - just stick it in there. If you do it manually, use {{db-copyvio|Herbert}} putting the author's info instead of Herbert. I don't know what Page Curation does - I can't stand the thing. If it looks like a copy from a manual, try Google and if nothing comes up, try a copyvio tag explaining that it looks like a manual. It'll be unencyclopaedic anyway, so even if CSD is declined, PROD should see it off.
0
" the part that starts with ""if"". there is no ""ifs"" in history. This is an encyclopedic article, not an essay or political fantasy novel. Not to say that you guess is not supported by history, as I explained. mikka (t) "
0
Which title do u suggest? (Be exact).
0
(UTC) I wrote everything from the sources listed, except for the last, which someone else added. (talk) 06:27, 5 January 2007
0
" I added a tag to the article & listed the afd at the log here. I protected the article because there are 2 opposing ""camps"" of editors fighting over this topic. Even assuming good faith I expect at least one individual to possibly go on the attack against this AFD in a big way. I don't have an opinion one way or another on this topic, but just a fair warning; be prepared because the ride may get a bit bumpy. talk "
0
" Duckfan8: Thats okay. I saw the 1st ep. It was good but I can`t wait to see ""DIng a Ling"" and the madge eps."
0
Vandalisom Must End Look at this it has to stop I wanna request this article be locked for a few months
0
Updating This table should be updated since it's a year old... what's the easiest way to go about doing this? ~
0
I have changed it after the 2nd edit on each occasion. The first time I was told I did not have a source, so I got a source. Then I reverted it back, reverted it back again (2 edits) and now I have found an additional source...so we are on 0 reverted edits currently.
0
, 11 March 2014 (UTC) Let me know how you like it. I've only read the Richard Burton translation, which is a little florid, but I love 19th century British prose, so it suits my taste. A modern version could be super-fun too, though!— (talk) 20:35
0
" Your opinion here. Your opinion would be most welcome at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States courts and judges#Proposed renaming of List of judicial appointments made by Barack Obama. Cheers! T "
0
What the heck are you talking about? I ask, my good chum, because your question is unclear. And if it's unclear, how can it possibly be answered?
0
" Are you and I even reading the same text? I suppose I should ask him what he means by ""quite stable."" '''' "
0
Editors should be aware that this discussion has been canvassed to several editors in violation of WP:CANVASS (see ). These messages violate WP:CANVASS in that they are biased and are only posted to editors who have previously supported one side of the dispute. You will notice that similar canvassing also occurred for the previous RM. '''' talk
0
" A Barnstar for You! Well, I don't know if you still check this or not, but just in case you do, I would like to award you the new, extra special... The South Park Barnstar For founding my favorite WikiProject, I award you the first ever South Park Barnstar! [review] [review] "
0
Article is too long I just removed a lot of non-Muhammad pictures. The text too is bloated and unnecessary. The article does not have to talk in length about everything - thats why we have the sub-article links. This is like having 10 articles on one page. It should be trimmed. (talk•contribs)
0
'Oriental studies put Mohammed as the founder of Islam but the Islamic faith regards him as one of the prophets and the last messenger of God.'Anyway if no one is interested then we can leave the article as it is.
0
Forbes List I have finally got around to reading the talk page. Though I believe the inclusion of a Forbes reference in the heading of a wiki page detracts from the credibility of wiki due to the subjective nature of the source I will relent in my pursuit of improving wiki content by moving or removing Forbes material for Dilma Rousseff and Sonia Gandhi. It is interesting to note that the most powerful man in the USA (Obama) does not have a Forbes ranking on his page. Neither does Dmitry Medvedev, Shimon Peres, David Cameron, Stephen Harper, Julia Gillard, Bronisław Komorowski, Jalal Talabani or dozens of other world leaders. How about some consistency... B. Fairbairn (talk)
0
Cape Zhelaniya Hello, Advisors. I saw that you've changed the page Cape Zhelaniya. (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cape_Zhelaniya&action;=history). I used this web-site (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extreme_points_of_Europe), altogether with other web-pages (http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/Extreme_points_of_Europe, http://en.allexperts.com/e/e/ex/extreme_points_of_europe.htm etc.) as references to support my writing. Can you please point to me at least 3 other reference web-pages that you used for your changes? Thank you, February 17, 2010 - 20:29 (UTC)
0
" Can somebody please make a page for the album ""Rebuilt"" there is enough information to make it!"
0
" No, you're getting it wrong. This is not a personal preference but a use of the tools available here at Wikipedia. I'm not disobeying the WP:NPOV policy, since I'm being neutral in relation to both systems. By adding the color green to a positive answer (a ""yes"" for example) or red to a negative answer (a ""no"" for example), like its default use, I'm not stating that a system is better than another in a certain aspect, I'm simply using the tools available without breaking any Wikipedia rules/policies. "
0
Article completely rewritten to place Candid Camera in context within the overall subject area: social documentary photography in Australia. What was implicit, for someone who read the article with some existing knowledge of the subject and checked the references, is now explicit. Noted on a sentence-by-sentence basis; linked whenever possible. I’ve tried to make sure that the other edits have been carried forward, where that’s appropriate, but apologise if I haven’t got them all. Can I suggest that anyone who has commented or voted on the AfD page take another look?
0
" Well, the USA has an embassy in Beijing, China and doesn't seem to use ""Beijing, PRC"". "
0
The silicon solar cell image was moved down to the beginning of the second paragraph. The link was interferring with the Introduction statement that search engines report with search results.
0
" La Presse? La Press is listed with the Globe and Mail as one of Canada's ""newspapers of record"". To my knowledge La Presse is more of a regional Quebec based french-language newspaper, with only limited reach and/or influence outside of Quebec? Perhaps it is a provincial ""newspaper of record"" but it seems misleading for it to be on the list. "
0
I see, despite the large number of warnings you have received, you are now edit warring to include commentary which is not present in the source material.
0
President is the right term though he was dictatorial. Then we can call George Bush also a dictator, as he hadn't any mandate to scheme things without Congressional degrees in most of the issues of Iraq. Mostly all are his personal or from others on personal level.
0
It's far from a default keep. Your message is incredibly premature. Even if you disagree with me, I'm disappointing you seek to circumvent the process so early in it.
0
Ideally all that are mentioned in the sum of Pevsner's books and more.
0
Reply Who can read and understand this vandal herostratus anyways?
0
" Because, smartass, that's where 3 experienced editors gangrape your little ""estimate""."
0
" I've put in the article the comments of other user. I've written that the Dictionary is claimed to be ""Croat"", by the Croats, and that the claim is reported even abroad. Thus the claim is politic and it is neither scientific nor historic. Micaglia is Italian and there is no discussion about it, nevertheless his origins were correctly reported as ""South Slavic""; the concept of ""Croat nation"" with the meaning of ""South Slavic"" and ""Catholic"" was born just in the 1840s. "
0
Apologies I'm taking the first oppourtunity since being unblocked to apologise to you. I did mean what I was saying, and it was very heated, but if you were offended I do withdraw, and I understand your frustration with subsequent events. I hope this doesn't come across as groveling, or cowardly, but as an honest statement. It would be a pity for this project to loose any of us. I am sorry. talk
0
Since the admin has already blocked MOVE of the article. The only thing you can do is just to ignore the move title discussions when someone's already opposed it with good reasons, they're not poll, repeating the same tone of POV only encourages further trolling.
0
" If anything, doesn't the quote 'Eastman stated that the party had no hidden agendas, despite being labelled an arm of the Christian Right movement. ""There's no formal structural approach to churches in any way,""' do good anyway? The paragraph starts off with saying that FF announced Eastman as lead candidate and spokesperson, and goes on to show Eastman clearing the ""misconception"" that FF has no hidden agendas... "
0
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. (talk)
0
Crickets? Does that mean there are no objections to this proposal? If people don't articulate their objections I can only assume that said objections no longer exist, especially in light of the current state of the Scorecard below.
0
Berksguy I'm telling you right now that if you continue to condone the smear of my character on his page, then I will resort to legal action to stop it.
0
" You can also see that ""layout engine"" has the edge if you try the following searches: http://www.google.com/search?q=""browser engine"" AND ""HTML5 support"" -wikipedia -site:wikipedia.org http://www.google.com/search?q=""layout engine"" AND ""HTML5 support"" -wikipedia -site:wikipedia.org"
0
Sorry for the delay. I totally agree with you. On this website you will need to cite your sources to prove that these people consider themselves as black or black american, what kind of mess is that? That user Mecelite or whatever how you spell it is not slick at all.
0
Updated some of the taxonomy; several that were formerly considered separate species are now all classed as M. sylvestris subspecies.
0
" Indeed, by far the best way to do it is to scrape the actual rendered HTML. Thus you're using the wiki parser to include all of the images for you. Then just grep the HTML source for all of the image tags and parse out the actual wiki names of the images using the links that they're wrapped in. "
0
" No problem, and thanks for mine lol. (talk • contribs) - "
0
This one might be transwikied to Wiktionary, rather than, or in addition to, merging to Tragedy of the commons. — (talk)
0
What did i vandalise? - william@iamfake.com
0
" Daffodil Daniel I can understand how a well-intentioned Wikipedian would want to remove said article, but I think this is a bit rash. Do you understand where I'm coming from? Please see the Daffodil Daniel talk page. Thank you. Hi GroverTheGnome, Here's a suggestion that can help you. Why not write your articles temporarily on your user page (or subpages). They don't have to meet Wikipedia's notability requirements. And when the subject becomes notable you'll be able to rename (""move"") them to the titles you want. It's an easy way to get around the requirement for notability. So don't worry, you can still write the article on this subject and have it on Wikipedia, just in a different place. I hope that suggestion helps. Best regards "
0
"This issue is addressed above, but I don't think any moderators have concluded on it. Point is, crack cocaine, and cocaine, are 99% different, generally speaking, and therefore should be listed seperately in their own articles. The only similarity is the word ""cocaine"", and their chemical similarity, which isn't much because crack is the base form, and coke is the salt form. "
0
Agreed. Removed. ( )
0
" However, you could use the same argument to delete almost everything in the article because many encyclopedias include a description of Jimmu so short it doesn't even cover things like the origins of his name and title and the issue of his historicity. In regards to the consensus of Wikipedia editors, and I'm not referring to Flying Tiger, when Nishidani proposed that in the long run we discuss all aspects of Jimmu's memory from start to finish, including medieval and Tokugawa times, historiography, and popular culture, most users who commented agreed with that even though it's safe to say that no encyclopedias cover these last three things. It's certain that people in Japan made a clear link between Hakko Ichiu and Jimmu and if you had done a less restrictive book search, you would still have found no fewer than 430 English language sources noting this connection, including the reliable sources this article cites like Edwards, Dower, Earhart, Ruoff, and Brownlee. For instance, Emperor Hirohito evidently referred to Jimmu when he said ""It has been the great instruction bequeathed by Our Imperial Foundress (the Sun Goddess) and other Imperial Ancestors that our grand moral obligation should be extended to all directions and the world be unified under one roof."" As historian James McClain notes ""As every Japanese schoolchild who had read Kokutai no Hongi knew by heart, hakko ichiu meant 'eight cords, one roof' and first appeared in the eighth-century chronicle Nihon Shoki."" The association between Jimmu and Hakko Ichiu was extensively cultivated in wartime Japan, most scholars are aware of that, and it is highly relevant for Wikipedia purposes. Concerning our four sentences on Hakko Ichiu, for now I'd say we can shorten it to three if necessary, possibly deleting the sentence cited to Bix, but otherwise I see no reason or consensus to trim it back further than that. Frankly, as the article gradually expands there is even more that can be eventually noted here such as perhaps uchiteshi yamamu, the other wartime phrase attributed to Jimmu, or possibly Okawa Shumei's establishment of the Jimmu Society. The resurrection of the Jimmu propaganda machine in modern times does not need to be downplayed for fear of ""completely ignorant anti-Japanese POV-pushers"". Actually, I think we should try to contact Flying Tiger and let him speak here if we're going to keep on talking about him in those kind of terms. "
0
incorrect he could not have directed any episode of alfred hitcock presents as it began airing in 1955 when thomas carter was 2 years old and stopped airing when he was 12 years old, so i will remove it from the television list.
0
Ok, I was doing a lot of minor edits (though I admit I forgot to mark them as such) so I wasn't sure if an edit summary was necessary.
0
" Requested move Talk:Fresh of the boat — Fresh of the boat → Fresh off the boat – Article itself says ""off"". ""off"" redirects to ""of"" but used to redirect to an attack article (non-empty history). Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~ Discussion Add any additional comments "
0
<-I do not. Never claimed that. And another regular Wikistalker makes an appearance.
0
This is literally all over the internet and why would she personally tweet that it's double platinum if it wasn't true? I understand if you take it down since it's not an official source though
0
By the way if you just want programmability you have to go way farther back. Hero of Alexandria built a cart that could be programmed to go along a path using cord wrapped round pegs on a cylinder.
0
" List of products in The Simpsons Hello George. I see you've been actively making additions to List of products in The Simpsons. It is good that you're enthusiastic about the list. However, I would like to suggest that you might be going a bit overboard. There are literally thousands of products and stores in The Simpsons that are seeing in single shots as throwaway jokes, etc. If one were to list them all, the list would be fairly bulky and useless (this has happened on other Simpsons lists already and have had to be cut back). I'd like to suggest the following guidelines: Stores aren't products, so I would suggest you not list stores such as ""Herman's Military Antiques"". Bulk groups of products like the ""many antiques at Herman's Military Antiques"". Do not include real-world products like ""English Muffins"". If you do that, it's pointless. Everything in the house is a product. TVs, couches, drapes, carpet, etc. Besides which, I would argue that noone in the world would ever need to look up whether English muffins are sold on the Simpsons. Real world products are assumed to exist on the show since it is rarely shown otherwise. The list should really be for Simpsons-invented brand-names or invented products. The next issue is subjective, but I believe crucial to keeping the list from spiraling out of control: Products on the list should only be included if they are used more than once on the show. Throwaway jokes like Itchy & Scratchy Land Personalised License Plates are basically just describing a joke on the show. The list is really designed more for things like Laramie cigarettes, squishys and things that make up the Simpsons lore than a list of throwaway jokes. That doesn't mean some of your edits aren't perfect for the list; I believe you added ""Radioactive Man Comics"", ""The Springfield Shopper"" and ""Li'l Bastard Kits"". These are great ones, but things like ""Disemboweller IV"" needn't be included. I am going to be deleting some of the ones that fall into the bullet point list above (real-world items and bulk groups) but I'm not going to immediately delete single-appearance items, but I suggest you join a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject The Simpsons#List of products in The Simpsons. Thanks ) "
0
Flip! I didnt know xiphon was you, peter. That message scared the hell out of me, I thought it was another user who spotted the page. I swore loudly at the screen.
0
Are there Turks live? LOL I have never get reply neverthless search it.
0
" I note that there's no ""address"" and ""phone"" parameters at Template:Infobox church. If I change ""address"" to read ""location"", the address does display. I'm not sure if street address is normally included in church infoboxes: the documentation at Template:Infobox church/doc seems to indicate otherwise. "
0
" Wikipedia automatically expands that into your username and the current date. Thanks/ No sources reference, reverted edit Hi, thanks for the comment... The thing about that bit you added was it actually refers to the original/real meaning of taint as defined at wikt:Taint#Etymology 2, so it's not really relevant for this article. And no, I couldn't find and sources either! And yeah, I put forward the article for AfD and have worked on it since there was no conclusive result - make the best of a bad situation ;) Thanks/ behaving rudely eat shit DICKelbarrel the prior UNSIGNED comment was made by pamento. This is blatant vandalism and should be kept in case Administrator UncleG and I need to make a case for his removal I have been in contact with a fellow user named Dan. He has told me he has a close personal friend who is going to look it to this if you don't stop harrasing me RIGHT NOW! Reply Hi, nice to meet you. I'm mostly into classical music, but I'll take a peek at Smashed Gladys on your account. I would suggest waiting until you've been here at least three months or so, usually people are hesitant to grant adminship to someone who hasn't been here that long. When I said that I loved awards and food, I meant WikiFood...like the cookies you see on my page. ;) I don't really have a problem with my weight. ;) Ciao! Girl♪ I would definately second what said below. I'm not saying you're a bad user, I've just not seen much of your work around. Who are you working with? is not a registered user as of yet. I did look at your article you mentioned. If I remember correctly, it looked good, but as I said, I have no interest in rock/pop/jazz/etc., so didn't pay much attention. Joshua Bell, Itzhak Perlman, Julia Fischer, Midori Goto, and Sarah Chang are all young classical musicians, if you want a partial list of some. Ciao!Girl♪ ""rank"" Hi Pickelbarrel. Well, I'm a Wikipedia:Administrator, which means that, apart from the usual work of editing and writing articles I can do a few additional things associated with trying to keep the place running smoothly and cleaning up when it runs less smoothly. So I can (un)delete articles, (un)block account, (un)protect pages and edit protected pages within strict limits. That's all, though. Some people find these things useful, others are fine with never having those additional abilities and the responsibilities that come with them. The actual process to becoming an admin is to make a Request for Adminship, in which the community will scrutinise your general conduct and work. Generally, the community does not grant adminship to users with less than 3 months of good contribution across a reasonably broad spectrum of activity. After all, if you're going to have the ability to help look after the place, you need to be well-familiar with how it normally looks and works. So you need to show that your responsible and trustworthy, civil when in conflict and that you have a good grasp of the various policies, guidelines and common practises. There's a lot of advice in WP:GRFA which you can look through. You can also read through the current nominations on WP:RFA and see the reasons people give for supporting and opposing requests. You may find that your time on Wikipedia is entirely fulfilling without the additional admin tools — after all, you don't need any of them to actually write the encyclopedia. -talk Old successful nominations are held in Wikipedia:Recently created admins and old unsuccessful nominations in Wikipedia:Unsuccessful adminship candidacies. If you want to get a quick vandalism block, you can add th
0
Just a note - Guess it wasn't compromised after all. talk
0
" Rugby Hey, I saw your contribution to Rugby union and thought you may want to take a look at WikiProject Rugby union. Anyway questions or queries feel free to contact me on my talk page. I can't believe we overlooked the history section though! I think somewhere along the way when the page got split off into separate articles it got lost, so thanks for fixing it. - talk "
0
"::::: I support this idea but we should remember that ""Adults in Scouting"" is also a organisational program by WOSM aimed even at youth leaders... "
0
Re coverage, it's always helpful to know about events beforehand. -) We have a suggestions page or my email is always open!  [talk] [majestic titan]
0
To what extent is realim compatible with modelling?
0
Not sure why you feel as if you have ownership over this page. If you don't like it, it gets deleted, even if it archived fact? What's your problem?
0
IMO the fact that you spend so much time and effort deleting info primarily on politically conservative Christians, or apolitical figures displays strong POV. Could you point out any liberals who you favored with you hard work? How about liberal Christians? The Jimmy Carter article needs your handiwork. He's a good Christian. Could you explain why you are primarily scrubbing info from the bios of conservative Christians, and how that is not POV? Thanks -
0
THIS SITE IS ASKING FOR IT WITH THE EDITING AND THAT WEIRD NAME LOL!
0
" The National Alliance still exists. See: www.natall.com The new Chairman is William White Williams. See article by the SPLC called ""Triumph of the Will"" and stop reverting edits that you have no idea are valid. Thanks!"
0
User WALTHAM2 deletion of referenced content Please do not delete referenced content as you have done in this article .
0
" Done. The article is now posted to the main Wikipedia space (also known as the ""article space"") at John P. Healey. Good work. Talk "
0
Thanks Thank for removing Scott Clemmensen's bio from the the Lowell Devils roster page!
0
August 2009 Please do not add hoaxes to Wikipedia. Hoaxes are caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please don't disrupt Wikipedia in an attempt to test our ability to detect and remove such material. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia policy to learn more about this project and how you can make a positive impact. Thank you.
0
the history our fair country
0
" Sandbox Your draft/copy of the article from your user page has been saved at (talk "
0
Shakira's sales Hi, I am just ussing the sales Shakira has in her OFFICIAL WEBSITE http://www.shakira.com/biography/ and a report from BMI: http://www.bmi.com/news/entry/535199 . There they said that Londry Service has sold 13 million not 20 million. These are official sales from official sources, I think you can not change them from the sales you find in another article. Sorry for my english. Thanks
0
Goodbye Everyone I am Blocked From Wikia However you can still see me on here like the loser that I am. Infact I am going to watch the page of 70.127.201.51 day and night now since I have no life. Why did you get blocked?
0
reviewed|1=original unblock reason|decline=As per Irishguy's comments below. It looks like you haven't understood WP:NOR, WP:V, WP:RS, or WP:CITE, and probably not WP:NOT. Your addition is interesting and shows you have put in some time, but it's not quite ready for Wikipedia. Please read the policies I've linked to here and rework your contribution. To other admins, note that it is absolutely not unblock abuse for this user to rework his contributions to add reliable sources and then to re-request an unblock. —
0
"::::::Wikipedia doesn't have to follow the Gamaliel standard. Editors dont need to run things by you to see if you accept their ""notability"" which, as mention, is you either using the word badly or not understanding the policy. If , who actually UNDERSTANDS wikipedia policies has no problem with it, then why should you? Perhaps you don't understand concensus either. Consensus isn't me winning you over, consensus I both sides attempting to come to a common middle ground. How about, instead of poopooing it, you sit and have a think about how a quote from a biography about Roman Polanski could possibly belong in a Roman Polanski article. "
0
condition unlike what he did).
0
Indeed. Especially as this article is about its use as a national flag, in terms of this article it is very much historic.
0
hahah wow you are so funny
0
" If they do not respond to you or anyone else, but still continue to cause problems disruptively, the situation may be able to be handled as vandalism. Could you post me some links to look at so I can see what they are up to? I'll be able to form a much clearer position once I have a bit more context. אמר (/AMA) "
0
" Personal attacks in edit summaries Hello, IllaZilla. I do not particularly care if you want to attack me in edit summaries, as you did here - I'm a man in his thirties (like you), and I just shrug at this kind of stuff. In a way I even enjoy it. But do be aware that not everyone has this attitude, so it might be best to keep ""kindergarten stuff"" and similar comments out of edit summaries. OK? "
0
Reported for blocking I just reported you for personal attacks and threats. Go take that high and mighty attitude somewhere else.
0
Error in the Sinfonias and two part inventions on the Bach Page.... The J. S. Bach page claimed and I quote from the page (under 'other keyboard works') The 15 Inventions and 15 Sinfonias (BWV 772–801). These are short two- and three-part contrapuntal works arranged in order of key signatures of increasing sharps and flats, omitting some of the less used ones. The pieces were intended by Bach for instructional purposes. This however isn't true. The sinfonias and inventions are NOT written in increasing number of sharps and flats... they are written in chromatic order from C up to B omitting some of the lesser used ones. I have played most of the sinfonias and inventions in piano and was shocked that someone wrote something as erroneous as this. It's like saying that the Well-tempered Clavier were written in some random order - COMPLETELY NOT TRUE!!!
0
Red Dwarf Christmas Special I've announced that will be a Christmas special of Red Dwarf will be on Disney XD between Xmas Eve and Xmas Day called The Phantom Empire. It will become the first Disney production. The Two-Parts of the episode.
0
" My mistake but my are you rude Looks like I responded to the wrong user, but to comment with ""who the hell are you?""?? A ""sorry, I think you got the wrong person"" would have done nicely. Maybe I was only partially wrong in my response."
0
Ignoring the facts once presented... so Wüstenfuchs! Stop hating Muslims then people won't have to correct your hate crime edits. Pretty simple.
0
Great work & a suggestion! Thanks for the new template, Deba! It works very well for established editors. Perhaps we could come up with a more cutesy, friendlier template for inviting newbie editors to WikiProject India?
0
Could you kindly state which ones? You have to be clear on specifying which citations are not valid. I will do research to see if the article contents are in citations given.
0
Unreal7, I wish you hadn't linked those - that's an unfortunately bad example since printed sources are all over the place on distinguishing those 2 songs (or the other 3 on the Living for the Weekend (disambiguation) page) by the '. It's an even worse case than Jumpin', and as you'd expect the only result of having raised those instead of appealing to guidelines is that a RM becomes inevitable for Talk:Living for the Weekend too. Sorry but we need precedents which actually are distinguished in print sources. Cheers.
0
The question is not if you or I found out about this The issue is can a reader verify that there is no official transcript?. And the answer is yes. t • @
0
" Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of actors nominated for two Academy Awards in the same year I withdraw the nomination. Crzycheetah's probably right, and trying to argue this won't work. Meh, back to better projects p (converse) "
0
Long time Hi, a long time ago you deleted an image I put on an article. I am sorry not to get back but I lost interest in the project. There is a point where it becomes futile to do work for nothing that is just going to be trashed by others who either have a clear agenda and/or know nothing about the topic. (I am not talking about you here). http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:Lewend.jpg The image was good and right for the topics it was one. Important from a British motorcycling point of view. What do I need to provide to reinstate this image? I can get permission from the company as it still exists if you can let me know clearly what I have to do. Thank you.
0
Thank you Thank you for taking the time to participate in my RfA. I hope that I will be able to improve based on the feedback I received and become a better editor.
0