text stringlengths 1 29.3k ⌀ | label float64 0 1 |
|---|---|
Is it worth putting up a roster? | 0 |
Sources for Vogl
Hi Simon! yes, I remember, and I'll add them. And hey, while I'm here, keep up the good work! (talk) | 0 |
"
By the way: Did you know that Project Pornography sets the maximum number of entries in a filmography to six (6)? This issue has come up at: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Pornography#Lists_of_award_nominations. Oh, and if it will help, ""minimal"" means 8,942.5. " | 0 |
Can you tell us the IP address of the institution? Normally instution's aren't hard blocked, and down grading to a soft block may be possible. | 0 |
"
Disk/disc
Angr, this is a very interesting essay (but being a stuffed up Brit I cannot agree with it!). However, I think I need to point out that 'disc' is not a verb in British English. 'To disk' (Amer. Spelling) may be a verb in US Eng. (meaning something to do with ploughing), and this will be why the inflected forms appear as 'disking' and 'disked'. The forms *discking and *discked could not exist simply because 'disc' when spelt with a '-c' is British English and is not a verb. (A word...?) " | 0 |
"
Thank you so much. ) What do you recommend I do with this type of thing? For a while yesterday our buffer at the back end was down to seven hours, which means risking a Siegenthaler-like gaffe (helpful admins scrapped a few BLP howlers in a jiffy). Keeping up with the pace of article creation means I have enough time to add a category or two to articles who have none, and sometimes wikify a bit. Occasionally the things I've prodded look like there's an article waiting to be made about the subject (just not enough in the material on the page to work from). Suggestions? Charge! " | 0 |
And specifically, you'll want to read this if the content is yours and you want the text restored. Mind, just getting it restored is not enough to keep the article around if the topic matter isn't notable. See WP:NSOFTWARE for more on establishing notability for software articles. | 0 |
Why is Slim Virgin so interested in all of these controversial Jew-related topics? Oh, that's right, its because she is defending the Jewish faith. Except that her entire point of view, on all of the topics, opposes the wishes of Jewish people. Perhaps Slim Virgin is angry at something. Perhaps she is the embodiment of this article. | 0 |
like where's Etznab? | 0 |
and wait a few minutes before attempting to recreate this page. | 0 |
Just remove the signature and replace it with the proper address, I think that it is obvious enough that someone should of done that already? 会話 | 0 |
I have started a discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Meek to determine whether this article should be deleted. Please note that the decision will be made based on Wikipedia's policies, not those of Goldman Sachs, who have no power to dictate what we choose to include in this encyclopedia. | 0 |
Thank you, Majoreditor.
As for Eschoir's sandbox, I see no reason to think a private discussion would be more productive than a discussion in a public forum where we know others are observing our attitudes and words and may kindly intervene and help, as I hope they will.
I am not arguing about a footnote. I am saying that a statement in the body of the article that questionably attributes something to a source should be followed, in the body of the article, by the actual text of the source. Any reason why it should not? | 0 |
"agree. I do not approve of Grayshi's maps. He has an agenda to exclude some census-defined regions of the South. Who is he to decide which regions get certain shades of red to indicate their ""southern-ness""? His maps are too vague and too subjective. Stop replacing the maps, sir, or we will continue to reverse your edits, which you take at liberty without a backing of facts or consensus. There should be, like there is now, only 3 ways a state should be shown on the map: Southern (red), Not Southern (beige), and Southern with debate (striped red). It is inaccurate to shade maps because there is no way that a gradation can be accurate in describing the various degrees of southern-ness. For instance, I can tell you that the region of Maryland in which I work is more ""Southern"" than parts of Montgomery County (which is geographically to the south of me) - so, in no way, would the shaded map be accurate in this, and other cases.
I " | 0 |
I did. http://img217.imageshack.us/my.php?image=untitled3th1.png it still doesn't work | 0 |
On a side note, you may want to work on these Dialogue Stalk me | 0 |
Electrons and Holes defining the Term Solid-State?
In view of my two preceeding sections I suggest do review the article as a whole.
I feel that the term can't be defined by the nature of the transport of charges. The term can better be understood and explained by showing and explaining the meaning it had at the different times of the evolution of technique. 217.237.149.206 | 0 |
Personal attack #4. Thanks for the 3RR warning though, I'm not going to revert the article for the rest of today. You have a good day. | 0 |
"
Do I need one? Do you have a cite for ""No one disputes there are racial gaps in IQ""? Actually, you can't have one (or at least, one that has any basis in reality), because I've just disputed it. The AAS likewise have disputed it, for that matter:
WHEREAS all human beings are members of one species, Homo sapiens, andWHEREAS, differentiating species into biologically defined ""races"" has proven meaningless and unscientific as a way of explaining variation (whether in intelligence or other traits),
'''THEREFORE, the American Anthropological Association urges the academy, our political leaders and our communities to affirm, without distraction by mistaken claims of racially determined intelligence, the common stake in assuring equal opportunity, in respecting diversity and in securing a harmonious quality of life for all people"".
This looks clear enough to me... " | 0 |
You are entirely wrong. And you also seem not to understand how wikipedia works. Wikipedia gives no preference to indigenous communities or the national usage in these cases. Those communities can create wikipedias in their own languages where their preferred usage will prevail. Your disregard for the editor community as a source of consensus is particularly problematic.·snunɐw· | 0 |
"
Last comment
I know you are going to delete this anyways but I just want to say an apology would have been appreciated and mature. I don't usually mention this because I don't like to play the pity card but it so happens that I'm diabetic so I really didn't appreciate the ""sorry you didn't reach candyland"" comment. " | 0 |
"
OK, this is fine now. Don't just say ""that's false"" because I tried to revert to your edit and it would not let me. Maybe you know better. But be more respectful. " | 0 |
Jessica hight
The article Jessica hight has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. | 0 |
40233.3986111111 | 0 |
Image:Shes_all_that_screener_cap.jpg
I have tagged Image:Shes_all_that_screener_cap.jpg as , because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Talk | 0 |
"
As you know, having replied there before, this matter is already being discussed here, two headings up. Perhaps the two heading should be merged to prevent confusion. I'd hate for someone to stumble on this ""Recent Karwynn deletions heading and, by no intention of your own, think that I deleted disputed material without discussing it on the talk page. Either way, here's what I have to say about the matter. I know it's long, but bear with me - you might find the rambling actually makes some sense.
Weasel Words
Your examples of improving weasel statements should be appreciated for what they are, but unfortunately, they don't really apply here. The full process you linked to involved escalating from ""some say"" to ""BUsh's critics"" to ""Michael Moore"" followed by accounts of a specific statement, namely, Moore's letter to Bush. Here, that process has not been fully employed. Unlike the specifically referenced Moore letter to Bush, which was direct and obvious in who it represented, these sources themselves still contain weasel words; take this sentence: A White House long accused of squelching internal dissent and ignoring outside viewpoints. Accused by whom? As I said before, just because weasel words are sourced, even directly quoted, doesn't make them ok. n your example, the weasel words were eliminated by referencing the source of criticism directly. ""Michael Moore said whatever"". In this case, we still haven't discovered who is doing all the accusing. To say that the Washington Post is making the accusation is inaccurate. To say that the Washington Post says that Bush has been ""long accused"" is an accurate weasel statement, not worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. It fails verifiability as well, come to think of it: the article certainly doesn't bother to support the sentence. Read it for yourself. They just throw it out there. Verifiability doesn't mean ""you can find it somewhere else"", it means ""It's been or can be verified to be true"". Perhaps it can be, but this article doesn't do it. Do you see the difference between this case and the example provided in the WP:AWW guideline? In the guideline's example, the weasel words were overcome by citing. In this case, they still remain, because they are inherent in the source itself.
Citing the opinions of these articles
Well, this problem should speak for itself. Opinions, including those of journalists, should not be cited as support for a claim. It would be one thing if these criticisms were being mentioned to verify their existence (see Laura Ingraham, an article in which numerous criticisms are used to self-verify, but not used to support a claim within the article that Laura Ingraham is good or bad or this or that), as they are for many public figures, but they are being used as support for this ""particularly notable because"" statement. As I said before, which was ignored this... well, I'll just repost what I said before.
It's not a neutral article, nor is it a notably important surce. It's just another source. I could find an article that says something along the lines of ""Stephen Colbert proved that he is a manipulative, arrogant polemicist who cares nothing for social graces and only wishes to make a name for himself by being extreme and controversial"", and if I stuck that sentence in the article's main body and referenced it, it would be (rightly) reverted before long. The same if I found an article saying that the accusations against Bush being intolerant of dissention were just a knee-jerk criticism and a political tool, lacking any merit. We shouldn't be able to throw political commentary into articles without restraint based on the premise that it's ""sourced"". This entire statement contains non-neutral commentary about the performance; I don't care if it came from somewhere else, it's still not neutral to include it.
So here are my thoughts on this point, summed up.
Citing opinions is fine for verifying the existence of those opinions/criticisms, but not for supporting the Wikipedia article's opinionated claims (which, see above, shouldn't be in there in the first place).
This article is not notable to the subject matter. It's very broad, compared to the narrowness of the article's subject (and, even narrower, it's notability and the cause of it). The specific criticisms are not uncommon, and the article's themselves are not controversial. They are not important enough to be set apart as evidence pertaining to the performance's notability and Bush's reputation. Additionally, the source is more focuse | 0 |
":Well, of course, since it's a piece of ficticious crap, the answer is nobody. On a more serious note, designs can be patented, texts and images can be copyrighted, but ideas and concepts cannot be owned. Once sombody came up with the idea of creating conductors for electricity (e.g., wires), they could copyright the design of a machine for making wire, but couldn't claim ownership of the entire concept of a conductor made of a strand of metal. the book seems to take the position that this is wrong. The ""motor"" couldn't be owned by anybody if it simply relied on physical properties that a certain design took advantage of. This is one of the major failings of the novel, IMO: it relies on a fantasy of perpetual motion.
" | 0 |
Who am I?
Since you bothered to ask a question, I guess I should answer. As far as you are concerned, I am someone that has seen your editing efforts as suppression of fact (which in fact they have been). I suspect you are a sockpuppet or paid propagandist of some kind, despite your stated interests (most or all of which I share). | 0 |
Another fix for TagEmptySection: don't tag sections with only text as empty. Thank for both fixes. ~~~~ | 0 |
== i can´t even create an article is unbeievable the censorship that exists in this magazine oh sorry encyclopèdia | 0 |
Are there any alternative explanations? I have no problem calling it proposed, as long as we include alternative explanations if there are any. All viable theories must require high loading and all of the contending theories do because no anomalous effects are seen at low loading and all anomalous effects are observed at high loading. | 0 |
User Page
I'm sorry to know that my user page resembles yours....Maybe, you have copied mine, anyway you must consider re-editing and making a page of your own....Srop copying brother... | 0 |
Thanks AustralianRupert, I've just added some more to Espelid and will try to track down the 2 other sources requested. I don't know how to source the Spitfire Op Training Unit one though, he couldn't have joined a Spit squadron without coming through a Spit OTU. I'll have a dig around the Spitfire website and see what I can find. Many thanks R44 | 0 |
"
A tag has been placed on Richard Cope, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. " | 0 |
"
If you look at the comments from the last FAC, not one of them asks for less information in the article. All of the comments either support it or ask for more information. What basis then do you have for offering a chopped version of this article that eliminates what the 25 supporters supported at the last FAC and was on its way to incorporating the comments of the 9 opposers? '''talk " | 0 |
"== Nice class ==
Hi there
I don't have a cite for the ""nice class"" concept. To be frank, the only place where I saw people reffering to that concept (and also the ""very nice class"" concept) was in a couple of C++-related Usenet groups, where the concept is usually used as a general guideline for class creation.
On the other hand, my only interest in object-oriented programming is purely recreational (it's a small hobby) and therefore I feel that I'm not in a position to make big academic statements on this subject.
So thanks to your message I realized that not only the references to the subject are scarse but also that it isn't widelly used. Therefore I believe that this article may be entitled to a ""original research"" label.
If you decide to mark the article for deletion it will be fine by me and I will not object.
Hope this helps | Talk " | 0 |
Warning #2
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. 68.42.27.164 | 0 |
What I think
I think the article is in preety good shape, there is no reason to change it back the way it was, it looks perfectly good. I suggest it stays the way it is now. | 0 |
image
can`t get his image to work. =[ | 0 |
Sargur
Dear Mr Amar,
The initial one line write up on Sargur has been expanded with lot of referenced text. Will you please add the text on demographics? You may also like to edit and add more text. I can't add any pictures since I have yet to understand the nuances of uploading photos and obtaining no objections from copy right angle.I am in the process of finaliising an artcle on Sosale which I will upload next week.Regards Ys | 0 |
"
Speedy deletion of User:Tatoluiz
A tag has been placed on User:Tatoluiz, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ω612 " | 0 |
There will most definitely be a merger, once I have the time to rewrite the page. The community is wrong, yet again. The quality and accuracy of the article will not be sacrified to appease 5 or so misinformed editors with an opinion. Sources and accuracy trump any misguided consensus. | 0 |
Hello!
I thought you would appreciate this rather good, humorous overview of some of the past events on Wikipedia. | 0 |
"
Looks like someone will be receiving a block. '''' MICHAEL Q.'' " | 0 |
http://wikipediawehaveaproblem.com/evidence-of-cyberbullying-wp-editors-and-admins/ http://wikipediawehaveaproblem.com/evidence-of-cyberbullying-wp-editors-and-admins/ | 0 |
Wolfstone 1 & 2 albums
Were these released in 1989 or 1990 / or 1994 or 1996? I know they were recorded 89/90 but weren't they released 94/96? | 0 |
You can tell me something about me. | 0 |
"
false accusations, Historic Jonesborough, etc.
Sorry to bother the current and future editors following this article, but it seems this article is to be added to a long list of articles where I have edited where long-time adversary Orlady follows and finds fault. I don't get her motivation. This to explain some back and forth editing on this article which you may see.
1. I added mention of the NRHP listing in 1969 of the Jonesboro Historic District, which she then disputed, adding a silly citation needed tag. As she is well aware from long discussion at the article for that district, it is NRHP listed, that is factual, it is not seriously in doubt.
2. I added general mention of the fact that ""A larger area has been promoted as ""Historic Jonesborough"" since then"", to which she added a wp:OR tag and/or removed it in subsequent edits. In one edit summary, Orlady stated that it ""is speculation and synthesis, including the concepts of ""larger,"" ""promoted as,"" and ""since then."" Not merely an issue of needing a citation.""
Orlady has read numerous webpages of the Historic Jonesborough organization, which I believe was created after 1969 and which certainly has promoted a larger area than the NRHP-listed historic district as Historic Jonesborough since then. It is a fact, not even a controversial one that the organization has promoted an area since 1969, that the area is larger than the NRHP-listed historic district. The Historic Jonesborough webpages mention the historic district but do not name it, and they are i-think-deliberately vague on the boundaries of the district but nonetheless adequately imply that the Historic Jonesborough area is larger. Further, I have verified the facts by reading the NRHP nom document which identifies the area of the historic district, and compared that Historic Jonesborough documents promoting inns and motels inside and outside of that district.
I don't think this amounts to wp:SYNTH which is original research, to be avoided as perhaps it might advance a controversial POV position. I believe the current article no longer mentions Historic Jonesborough, which ought to be given pretty salient coverage in the history of this town, for its actions to preserve and promote the town.
3. Orlady changes the name of the historic district to display as ""Jonesborough Historic District"" rather than to display as the name it was given in the NRHP listing, ""Jonesboro Historic District"". That change is possibly implementing wp:OR, as there appear not to be evidence the NRHP listing name is changed. There is discussion ongoing in a requested move at Talk:Jonesboro Historic District (Jonesborough, Tennessee); I think the official, original name should be displayed here unless and until there is a different resolution at the article on the district itself.
Perhaps other editors would like to comment on what are the facts, and/or to step in to fix up the article. Or perhaps you all would prefer to avoid this. Again, sorry to have brought dispute to here. ncram " | 0 |
Yes, because that, along with this response, is a so much more productive use of your time than finding the source you're demanding... 76.204.89.112 | 0 |
"
Hi Zora, My understanding is that a Dargah is the burial-place of a muslim devine, which becomes a place of prayer and pilgrimage. However, I find that ""Dargah"" redirects to Khanqah, and that page makes no mention of burial at all. Maybe others have favoured this redirection as the Mausoleum page has a lot of christian context, but is that not more appropriate? Please advise. Regards, " | 0 |
"
Apparent problem in article
There's an apparent problem with the math here. Unfortunately I can't read French, so can't verify one of the numbers, but hopefully someone else can.
To quote from the article ""Wealth_tax"":
""...in no place where this kind of tax is in place does it contribute to more than 0.3% of the total tax intake ([1]).""
and
""France. In 2003 out of €786 billion ""general government"" receipts, €174 billion was collected on ""income and wealth"". No further breakout is disclosed. Data is from the Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques.""
€174 billion out of €786 billion is 22% - however ""general government receipts"" might not (probably does not) mean the same as ""total tax intake"". A clarification of the two would be useful." | 0 |
I am being perfectly civil, Benon. I just don;t see why we have to follow T-Man around. It's like taking your dog or pet armadillo for a walk... clean up after him. | 0 |
"
Goodbye everybody
And what on earth is wrong about this article, specially if settet back where it originally belongs?
I do not accuse people to be socket puppet, I do not insult them with harsh and very illustrativ words, I do not call their articles for garbage or for saying nothing usefull, or for being idiots, nor ignorant, nor do I pretend that they do not contribute with anything on the talk page and never did, nor do I revert other users contributions, as YBM and rjb specially and mainly, as well as some other new users on the page like Maru that night and previous days did, and som other users belonging to the same side of the story.
If I had to be banished for that so had ybm and rjb and maru too and for a much longer period of time and their text to be removed, in fact all of them that night, as they didn't say much else but cynical and fruitless comments on other people works and destructiv critiscism who wasn't justify.
I tried more than 4 times to make them come v´back to ttheir mind and to sopt healding oil to the fire, but it didn't helped. They just had too much fun harrassing users all around the talk page, unpunished.
An objectiv analyse of the page will not only take much time but will most certainly show how true what I state here is.
There is a text that I do not found, an article with the copy/paste of the writting exchange between me and mister Jean Pierre Voyer, where he clearly stated his doing in this affair and his cooperation with YBM in the making of falsification of evidencies, and his arrogancy and proudness in doing so, added some discrepencies in his words and a major amount of respectlessness, and you have the picture of the person behind this all story.
I also received private mails from a mister Rupley, who is (which is) the name of one of YBMs' web site with plenty of litteracy of the kind of Voyer, and with links to Luven, also an ybms' website of the kind. It does not concern the Bogdanovs affair, but concentrate on the theories who corroborate the making of such a fake story and its justifications in doing so.
It's a hobby of some sort, like some like Shakespeare or a special branch of philosophy or politic or a sub for us mostly unknown special branch of a political - philosofical - opinionated - with social ramification kind of organisation, touching a very small group of individuals inclosed in their believes.
There is plenty of the like all over the world, their reason for adding to those ideas are those people life and choices, which I do respect, but in that case, those idiosyncrasies (thats my own choice of denomination and not theirs)are being punched ininto the reality of a lot of people and involved real ideas.
I think of course about the balancing act of inplanting those high flying ideas to the reality of the thousands of internet users by imposing their vues inthis Bogdanov affair. By vues I do not mean the apparent version of the fact given by YBM about the validity of the actual thesis. No. It isn't what it is about. It is more complex than that. It is about playing with people reactions in a situation of confrontations and playing with lies. Creating stories, ideas, like gossips who have no bund in the rality but who will nonetheless create a reaction in the people who are witnessing it at the time, and build on further from those reactions, and add more and more stuff to keep the tension and the artificial affair going on.
It might not be as complicated as it sounds to bring those ideas to live, as it very quickly get a dynamic of its own who keep repeating itself, if some element are implemented along the way.
It has roll this way for 2 years now, and the scenario are pretty much the same from a Forum to another.
One can see the same scenarios coming up, the same elements who keep coming back, the same strange behaviours at odd time, and the same surprising reactions when prooven wrong: a war take place, fill with denials, wild accusations, insults, personnal attacks, anything goes type of scenarios, with a lot of drama and tension in it, and many people getting injured, and leaving too.
mostly those who came with the unbeatable arguments as I saw it so many times on fr. physic, from june to november 2004.
Looking at it after without having a part of it, give the priviledged view of the whole thing in a very short period of time , in one view, and here all those flaws are very obvious and it seems estonishing that nobody noticed it at the time. The game is very clear that way, and it was clear for me that there was something wrong going on, something who wasn't right, a mismatch.
And i seek after what it could be.
It was evident that the main person involved didn't have clean floor in his bag, and that he was hidding something but also that he was clearly lying and very ""good"" at it, very good | 0 |
Please stop. If you continue to remove content from pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. talk | 0 |
"Personally I agree with what was said by Ilike2beanonymous:
I removed the fluff/nonsense about ""resonance"", which has little, if anything, to do with how a soundboard works. Resonance is a specific aspect of sound mechanics which has to do with the frequency of maximum amplitude of a system. What happens with a soundboard is actually much simpler: it has a larger surface area than a string alone, and therefore can move a larger volume of air, hence a higher volume of sound. +ILike2BeAnonymous
The term ""amplify"" is definitely true when it comes to the soundboard. I'm currently studying to become a pianotechnician myself and I would be very interested to hear your professionel explanation for saying that the soundboard does not amplify anything... As far as I know the word amplify has been used for a lot of non-electrical things for a long time now so I don't really see your point there either.
Care to elaborate?
" | 0 |
My secret page
hi penubag. try to find my secret page without using the cheat thing you made. | 0 |
Epic film – An epic film is a genre that emphasizes human drama on a grand scale. Epics are more ambitious in scope than other film genres, and their ambitious nature helps to differentiate them from similar genres such as the period piece or adventure film. Epic historical films often take a historical or imagined event, or a mythic, legendary, or heroic figure and add an extravagant, spectacular setting and lavish costumes, accompanied by a sweeping musical score, and an ensemble cast of bankable stars, making them among the most expensive of films to produce. The Dark Knight Rises is nearly three hours long, has an estimated budge of $250M ($100M more than Batman Begins and $65M more than The Dark Knight), large action sequences, and a popular actor or two. sounds like an epic to me. 138.162.140.52 | 0 |
Thank you for your input (User talk:Cassiegz|talk]]) | 0 |
"
This article is embarrassing
It sounds like she wrote it herself. Wiki doesn't put what the person ""thinks"" and little emotional stories in factual articles." | 0 |
"
Could you?
Hello, I see that you have copied my page (Just like your , who actually is really bad at wikipedia). Please, try and make it so that it doesn't look like mine. Thank you. Oh, and if I were you, i wouldn't be 's adoptee. (Talk) " | 0 |
RFC error
For some reason the replaced your RFC template at Talk:List of banned books#The definition of banned book with the RFC error template. | 0 |
December 2009
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Avatar, you will be blocked from editing. I assume that you are the editor previously using IP , and have been warned for the vandalism before | 0 |
Re: TTS. Surely you jest he is the definition of partisan, though it is perhaps telling that you feel he is not while UH scholars are. For LaCroix, you may wish to start here. Finally, WP:UNDUE trumps the argument you are trying to make, I'm afraid not all POVs are equal. The cites I removed were justified on the basis that they were pushing a POV. Again, the mere fact that POV statement/push is cited (the additions you so often make being quite the textbook examples of cherry-picking) does not legitimize it. This is elemental, and most unfortunate that you do not so recognize.
As for Viriditas' message, I couldn't agree more. If what it takes is taking this (and some of the other articles) to mediation, which I assume is what Viriditas means, I would support that if that's where we need to go to get the articles back to a NPOV. The current process of doing so is proving to be unnecessarily contentious and involving a high degree of nitpicking that is an utter waste of everyone's time. | 0 |
DSK Admin discussion re: ownership, tag-teaming
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. See here. | 0 |
"
What are you talking about, Darkstar? Not all conservatisms are free-market; ""liberal"" outside the U.S. means pro-freemarket policies. All the original right-wingers were statists and more or less virulently anti-freemarket; even an anarcho-socialist like me acknowledges that, whatever we think of raw capitalism. It is an American delusion that conservatism is an exclusively free-market ideology. | Talk " | 0 |
This web site has it all wrong regarding the Ladmo Bags. I was many years after Ladmo joined the show that the Ladmo Bags were introduced. Actually, there was a daily post card drawing for years before. The winner was invited to appear on the show and pick out a toy from the shelf. I'd change the page myself, but there are wakigods that lurk in these pages who would simply revert the page even though they have no knowledge of the show. They have no interest in getting it right for history sake. They just want to be a bully. To prove my point: Rob Cook gave them permission to post excerpts from his personal web page. For some reason, the wakigod that took down the page has not yet reverted it back. To set the record straight, Wikipedia should not be used by historians, present and past, to research the Wallace & Ladmo Show. | 0 |
Welcome!
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
Your edits to Homeowners association
I have just reverted your edits to this article, as they appeared to be uniformly negative and were completely unsourced, making some substantial claims that were unsupported by reliable sources. Please read through the links in the welcome message above; they will give you a good starting point in learning the guidelines that WIkipedia operates under. One of the key points is neutral point of view; all articles must be written in a manner that provides a neutral point of view. All additions must also be backed up by reliable sources, and verifiable. If you have issues with the article above, please go to the discussion page and bring them up there before adding unsourced information. Thanks. (arf!) review? | 0 |
Well, the problem is not about the Northern Iraq. Kurdistan usually referr to both norther Iraq and Eastern Turkey, and east. Turkey had never been a Kurdish country.
Also, there was an Azerbaycan in first World War. Also, it was a dynasty like China, but Kurdish people live in other countries for tousand years. They attack us, because we won't give any soil to a Kurdish state. | 0 |
Hi, Alphachimp, I have a question for you. I reverted some previous changes on some pictures of FF8 articles and that ticked off some people although I didn't mean to. I still want to keep them through. What do I do? -Eileen- | 0 |
|listas = Kapella, Scarlett | 0 |
"
What makes you say that? I just looked at the deletion debate. It was strongly in favor of ""Keep"" votes, as far as I could tell. In fact, I was hoping you would participate in the debate and add another ""Keep"" vote. I am a little confused. If it is mostly ""Keep"" votes, why would that make you stop caring? Let me know. Thanks. ( )" | 0 |
Your Fault
FireStar- I asked you nicely not to post the names of my friends, but when we went there this morning, there they were again. As usual, I have done everything you asked and all I get in return is treachery. Hasn't been a week since we had this war ended. You started it back up again by unprotecting the page and letting the Bulshido guys harass my friends. I don't want to come here and argue with you. I have already proven a hundred times that the only purpose this entry serves is harassment and asked you to take it down. You insist on hounding me when I have done nothing to warrant it. And, when I complain you tell me I've got an attitude. This is a pretty sick game, don't you think? Not really worthy of true martial artists. I ask again, as politely and nicely and respectfully as I can for you to protect this page or take it down.
Ashida Kim | 0 |
How about because it's not in Wales? It's in England, where the only official language is English. And whether my comments are POV or not is irrelevant, as they were in my edit summary and not in the article itself. As such you can not use them as a reason to revert. | 0 |
"
Your edits at Seph Lawless
This edit needs to be properly cited, per reliable sources. It can not contain original research or personal commentary. The reader cannot decide based on the video or audio alone if that is Seph or not. Please stop edit warring - further edits to revert the changes can result in a block. Please take it to the respective talk page. Thanks. | talk | contribs " | 0 |
"
Something like the ""new message"" thing at the top of your talk page. " | 0 |
"
WHC
Hmm, none that aren't already being used in the title article (like sorting by name and by date). If I find any others though I will let you know. Spyke " | 0 |
Sodium bicarbonate
In light of the above comments and because I wasn't able to find a supporting reference, I've removed the comments about treating candida infections with sodium bicarbonate. JL | 0 |
"
While I agree with the conclusions there, why are you posting this? It's not an official source and says nothing that hasn't been said here over and over again. OS X " | 0 |
Hey, I'm obviously all over it too... -) | 0 |
United World Chart
Please do not add the United World Chart, or any other chart listed in WP:BADCHARTS, to any article.— | 0 |
"
Thank you very much RyRy. You've improved a lot as well.:D (Hello! • Contribs) " | 0 |
Proposal of adding a new content of IT Infrastructure and Major Business center running in Saltlake City and New Town, Kolkata
Hi Wikipedians,
As proposed I'm working now on article based on IT Infrastructure and Business center running in Saltlake City and New Town.
I would really like if any wikipedia volunteer help for the photo's and content like (revenue generation and financial part, Clients associated with) major business center running over Saltlake City and New Town.
Proposed Requirement would be latest updated:
Photo's
Address of Business Center (For that We can use Nabadiganta Kiosk situated in Technopolis and College More Sector V, Saltlake city)
Business Process running in MNCs (financial, revenue generation etc)
Thanks. | 0 |
This may be illustrative:
Got it? | 0 |
"
More on ""dynasty"" vs. ""Dynasty""
Hi BabelStone. I'm contacting all the editors who have commented on whether we should un-capitalize ""dynasty"" in wiki titles. I have just proposed a new and simple way to make a final decision on this issue. Could you go to this new section to say whether you support my proposal? Thank you! Cheers, " | 0 |
That's pretty disingenuous. Erik's clever enough to know the likely result of his remark to Sarek. | 0 |
"
Other
dbname=enwiki Stats
, hereby give Crazy a WikiThank for having the precious knowledge that at times all that is needed is the right word. ]]" | 0 |
"
Compromise
I have told you before that I am all for the name Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac if certain conditions are met (which weren't last time around). I am willing to change my vote on the conditions that the title stays the way it is if the rest of the article only mentions Assyrians (outside religion section), because we can't constantly switch back and forth between ""Assyrian"" ""Syriac"" ""Assyrian/Syriac"" and ""Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac"" throughout the article because it gets really repetitive and annoying to the normal reader. Also every other page dealing with Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriacs has to say Assyrian as well in the article while the title can stay the way they are (Assyrian/Syriac in Blah). Does that sound good? Anyways, Edokh Brikha! " | 0 |
"It is NOT ACCEPTED at any part of the WORLD that any REMARKS / STATEMENTS be passed against any RELIGION that has the tendency to offend its followers or disrespect its teachings.
2) No personal attacks:- "".......Ad hominem argument is most commonly used to refer specifically to the ad hominem as abusive, sexist, RACIST.....""
Comment:- I along with more than 30 billion muslims find this article plus the (doubtful) pictures of Hazrat Muhammad(PBUH) offensive (do i need to sue the person who made these pictures inorder to convince wickedpedian that I find this article greatly offensive ? ).
3) If I ever say anything offensive against the wicked-pedia OR the administrator of wicked-pedia THEN my post will immediately be DELETED, why so; Because I am being offensive to some person... But when now Wikipedia is being offensive to billions of muslims then WHY IS THE PICTURE STILL ALLOWED TO STAY THERE ????
Just as a piece of reminder:- Not obeying Jewish religion or Christianity or Islam DOESNOT RENDERS the LOSS OF COMMON SENSE or SENSE OF MAKING FAIR DECISIONS.
PS:- WHATEVER I HAVE WRITTEN ABOVE, I SAY IT WITHOUT ANY APOLOGY.
My pointers may sound offensive to Wicked-Peidian team and their keen supporters . It was highly necessary to bring one obvious thing to their notice, EVERY RESPONSE THEY MAKE DOESN'T STAND WITH THEIR POLICIES / GUIDELINES, plus by justifying themselves for NOT removing offensive pictures EXHIBITS their NEGLECTS on core issues (which anyone will understand without detail explanation) and ALSO EXHIBITS their degree of foolishness because Every Person Knows that Before Making Any Laws Or Publicizing Anything, There is always presence of COMMON SENSE which is found missing in this wicked-pedia's case !!!!
I USE THE WORD WICKED-PEDIA INPLACE OF WIKIPEDIA..... HOW MANY VOTERS DO I NEED TO COLLECT TO CHANGE THE WEBSITE NAME???
This is also my last visit to this website, sad to see its involved in such activities !!!!
—Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs)
If you decide to be offended by something, then so be it. It is not our responsibility to ensure that no one is offended by the material in this encyclopedia. If it was, then we couldn't have half the interesting stuff that exists in here, since there is no doubt someone, somewhere who is offended by it.
" | 0 |
yes i like to play with balls ) | 0 |
May 2008
/Blaxthos ( t / c ) | 0 |
Use in quotes
In my experience, the pilcrow can also be used to denote paragraph breaks where space is a premium, like quotation marks or magazines (I believe I've seen them in Wired). Perhaps this should be added? | 0 |
I read the entire article that line refrences, and it only talks about the pilot/running stuff. Lot's of people will probably be coming here in the next few days, so I went ahead and fixed it. 24.225.23.137 | 0 |
Agreed. 18:18, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC) | 0 |
I checked the images, and most of them are contained in several books, each specifying they are U.S. Army images. I just went through the images and corrected many of the sources/authors as well. I also sent an e-mail to the National Archives to see if they can provide larger and/or additional images about the event. Would you like to e-mail me your e-mail address so I could send you the maps? I just realized that attachments can't be sent through the Wikipedia e-mail. I would greatly appreciate you creating an image, but if you are busy, please put this at the bottom of your pile, as there's no rush. Happy editing! (talk • contrib) | 0 |
Related Content
I work for a military library that conducts one-on-one interviews with Medal of Honor recipients. The video of these events are archived on our website where anyone can watch them. Would this be something you would want to have available as related content? Here is the link to the Leo Thorsness page as an example. I didn't want to add anything without checking first. I've never posted to Wikipedia before. http://www.pritzkermilitarylibrary.org/events/2007-03-22-leoThorsness.jsp | 0 |
Another typical Ryulong thread. It's getting so long, but is there any piece of text that helps improving the article? What can be found here is disruption, not discussion. Ryolong repeats debunked claims again and again. He continues this until no one is willing to waste his time. | 0 |
(UTC)
I recognise what you are saying, but unfortunately the word probe has propagated into many scientific publications about microarray analysis, therefore I suggest that the MIAME use of Reporters for known material and the alternate word probe should be used. Something like; Reporters (also refered to as probes)... 22:48, 19 September 2006 | 0 |
"
Btw, here is an example of a medical hoax on Wikipedia entering the medical literature: Glucojasinogen JN466 " | 0 |
. And that source itself shows the absurdity of calling these territories occupied and that the term disputed is biased | 0 |
"
i agree. split only when necessary by size, only 37k, nowhere near big enough. ⇔ †@1₭ " | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.