text stringlengths 1 29.3k ⌀ | label float64 0 1 |
|---|---|
Hello CogPsyc class... this is me leaving a message.
-Victoria Stasiak | 0 |
"
It's right there in the article: The Wayback machine ""is maintained with content from Alexa Internet."" Perhaps that could be expanded on somewhat, but I'm not sure how many of the details are public. tälk " | 0 |
HELLO RODENT
I just wanted to let you know I have not forgotten about you. | 0 |
Speedy deletion, blah blah blah
It's as notable as any J-rock band, such as Flow or UVERworld, the main issue is that most, if not all sources are in Japanese. - | 0 |
from a famous newspaer | 0 |
Keep - while it may not be onerous at present, bin Laden hasn't been dead a day yet. It's obvious that both articles will continue to grow considerably. | 0 |
Thank you for removing the vandalism at Mary Wollstonecraft. | 0 |
"= New Reply to my fellow Mongols ===
Delioglu/Deliogul, there is not need to thank me for showing ""a new level of the art of personal attack"".
Actually, we the Greeks and other Europeans have to thank you the Turks for ""teaching"" the mankind how to rape, plunder, pillage, depopulate, islamize and turkicize a big area populated by at least 15.000.000 Byzantine Greeks, Armenians, Kurds, Laz,Arabs etc.
For this is what your ancestors, the Seljuks did when they arrived at Byzantine Asia Minor around 11th C.AD.
You are schoolmasters of genocide and barbarity and Mustafa Kemal just added a ""modern"" facade to your murderous
national character.
You have given to humanity nothing else than horror, massacres, barbarity and ottoman backwardness.
You will always be our enemies until Nemesis throws you back to Mongolia and Ulan Bator where you belong.
==" | 0 |
I believe the top 100 officials or so are more than willing to sacrifice hundreds of thousands of their own. Tell me by the way - did the gassing of kurds in Iraq cause international military response? | 0 |
"
:Image:Aslambeg.jpg
Image deletion warning The image Image:Aslambeg.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. If you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, please provide the necessary information. (Μελ Ετητης) " | 0 |
You have no respect for the victims, you are with the killers. | 0 |
Most Successful team?
This must be up for debate as Rangers have never won the European Cup/Champions League and as far as im aware have only won one European trophy,the now defunct European Cup Winners Cup
Nicknames
I think huns should be added. There are some other unofficial nicknames on the page and I see no reason why this common (and popular) nickname should not be added.
It's not that bad if you think about it. It really is only three letters; UNHS. Any opinions on this?
Really it is a good idea. Kind of 'pride of preduduss.' Kind of like the Scots accepting Jock in a post-modern funny man kinda way, well done, mate!
Maybe we should add DOB as well???
Nah! That goes too far as it implies that we are not clean. And that we were born outside of wed-lock. AND that we are ALL afffilliated with the religion. That one should be put tae bed with other sectarian slanders.
Okay. What about The Gers.
Hmmmm, done!
The Sweep?
I don't get it and quite frankly I've never heard that one. Citation needed.
Opinions on the Sweep?
I like it, I mean it is a footballing word ain't tit? Sweep. Like what Svensson does at the back. Or Baconbauer. | 0 |
Can you please explain why you are hell bent on deleting this poor guy that others clearly see as 'notable'? No, you please stop Ragib, otherwise wikipedia is going to become an un-livable place. I would re-create the Abdul Ahad article, but I think you are going to speed delete him on the original AFD, even though his notability has VASTLY improved. | 0 |
Great new resources
Some wonderfully insightful material on the genesis of the show has been posted by the BBC in time for the 45th anniversary:
Should prove an excellent, and definitive, source for background details. | 0 |
Refutation of allegations concerning the Talmud
The Talmud in Anti-Semitic Polemics, Anti-Defamation League.
The Real Truth about the Talmud
Talmud Exposed
Falsifiers of the Talmud | 0 |
Hey
Thanks for ur contrib. I will reedit the article and post again when completed. | 0 |
Hey
Pascerboy is engaging in OR by saying a couple of conflicts aren't wars because of a few fatalities at list of wars 1900-1944. | 0 |
Yeah, this guy seems to be editing a number of pages with the same sort of 'Disney will make a film out of it' speculation. I see these same edits from 90.215.95.79, 94.11.59.187, 90.221.161.71, 94.4.151.186 - all registered to BskyB Broadband in the UK. Looks like a persistent sock-puppetteer, and may require admin intervention. | 0 |
"
Demi Lovato Box
Hi, I put the ""This User Thinks Demi Lovato Has An Amazing Voice"" box on my page. Is it ok? If not, i'll take it off. If it's not, i'm sorry I took it. But at least I asked! So can I use it? I'll credit you. " | 0 |
Proposed Deletion of Qatari football transfers summer 2015
i think this page should be deleted for following reasons;
It has no References
It is incomplete
It has no links to it
and finally out of respect to all the workers who died | 0 |
"
Found my error, it appears I saved the thumb image on the queue page, rather than the commons page. As it was the the exact image representation, it did not appear different when I looked at the final product. No excuse. Not like learning to ride a bike, huh. Time to get back to reading up on the vast discussion board archive over the last several months. Again thank you. Waters " | 0 |
Please sign your posts on talk pages per Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages. Thanks! | 0 |
So you want to say that there is no tomb of Hazrat Gazi Saiyyed Salar Sahu , situated in Satrikh, 8 kilometres (5.0 mi) away from Barabanki, in Uttar Pradesh, or there is no tomb of Syed Salar Masood Ghazi in Bahraich. So you also want to deny that this family including Salar Saif ud Din, Salar Qutb Shah, Salar Rajab did not fight many battles with Indian Rajas of Delhi, Kannauj, Kara, Manakpur etc. These are all stories. | 0 |
There is nothing a priori that prevents an admin from watching a contentious article that is already under enforcement and stepping in when needed. I probably did this a few times myself. You can have situations where the participants don't realize how toxic behavior is to others who might want to contribute (or indeed, they might enjoy the toxic environment). That said, if there is a concern that an admin is being too heavy-handed, it seems like the place to bring it up first is WP:AE so it can be reviewed by other admins who have experience in enforcement matters. Thatcher | 0 |
THAT IS CORRECT, IT IS ALL OPINION AND NOT FACTUAL. SHOW REPUTABLE MEDIA SOURCING IF YOU MAKE CLAIMS SUCH AS I HAVE ABOVE. THANK YOU PAUL BARRESI | 0 |
"
Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Help pages
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style
You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you [ create an account]. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (66.87.90.155) is used to identify you instead.
In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! " | 0 |
Can I ask, Sarah, did they have the support of the community when they were sanctioning people you didn't like? Or did they only lose it when they sanctioned someone you do? | 0 |
Oh you are so blinkered and so wrong, PC gone mad! Wikipedia is very biast and I am beginnning to see why. You are obviously afraid to stand up to the disrupters simply because they are establihed users who have never been challanged too much. To reiterate to you, I am not pushing my viewpoint as you put it, merely reporting the verified and established truth about murderers for example. You unfortunately are only too happy to maintain the status quo and, well, frankly your attitude is very disappointing. | 0 |
"Why'd you dump the reference to the documents at the Rep of Pirates blog? That's quoting new archival sources and the author even has an image of a portion of the original document. Just because it's a ""blog"" doesn't mean it lacks scholarly credibility. I suggest restoring that, but will await your response.
" | 0 |
"*""... Akbar (ăk'bär) [key], 1542–1605, Mughal emperor of India (1556–1605); son of Humayun, grandson of Babur. ... Although he was himself illiterate, Akbar's courts at Delhi, Agra, and Fatehpur Sikri were centers of the arts, letters, and learning. He was much impressed with Persian culture, and because of him the later Mughal empire bore an indelible Persian stamp. ...""
" | 0 |
It seems he even sent letters to the Pope. | 0 |
A paragraph, maybe. A whole chart like that... well, I won't complain about it, but I thought you should know. You're sorting various themes from inside the book and reorganizing them according to categories you've chosen. That isn't going to go over well here. - | 0 |
Some help.
Hey man. Can you help me with this guy who keeps vandalizing the UFC 191 page? Look at his edit summaries. They're quite amusing. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=UFC_191&action;=history | 0 |
"I'm just seeing this now. I understand your point about B&C; Holdings you're right, the link should be piped to exclude ""Holdings"" if it was not part of the name at the time.
I disagree with you about IATA - it is meaningless to the non-technical reader, and should be spelled out per WP:MOS. Others have made the ""click through"" argument, but Wikipedia errs on the side of clarity for the reader.
In the case of BEA, putting the acronym after the possessive form is not incorrect, but the sentence can read better rearranged to avoid that construction as you have done in some cases. An alternative is to consider whether the acronym in brackets is needed at all if ""BEA"" is not used elsewhere in the article, then it could be left out altogether.
And I apologise again for the blanket revert that I did in error on one article. That was an unfortunate slip of the keyboard that I did not intend. | t
" | 0 |
Tan, thank you.
I also request that I be given permission to return the article to the annonomousItalic text post which refernced the patent origianlly, as it was two months ago and allowed. Those observing will not note that I am ihe inventor. It will be done annonomous. That not intended to be promotion. Simply good refernce and citation. The insurance industry is apposed to patents and there are many executives who believe it should be open forum programing and business method patents are not unique valid inventions. The USPTO thinks otherwise. My patent was approved by the USPTO. One of the few business method patents approved for insurance. I look forwared to your response. Thanks again. Dale Menendez | 0 |
. What's with the religious thing anyway? You still haven't answered that. | 0 |
"
Talkback Section
Responded at my talk. (talk) " | 0 |
Hey Wkinght94, from Googie Man
I hope all goes well with you at Wikipedia, and you're as always, enjoying the world's greatest sport. To answer your question, yes, I am the one who left a nasty message on a user's page whose name now escapes me. Why did I do it? He took off the picture of Bobby Abreu that I took, looks like he tried to replace it with a copyrighted photo, and the Abreu article went for a few weeks without an image. Now I don't mean this as anything personal against you, as I've respected you and your work for years, and you've been nothing but nice to me. But, what I don't get is this: I can't tell you how many times I've had to re-introduce legititmate images that have been taken down by people who upload stolen images, or images of lesser quality. This detracts from the quality of articles, and frankly, I think people who detract from the quality of articles should'nt be allowed to edit. What I don't get is that whenever I pop-off at someone for doing this, I get busted immediately, yet no one replaced the Abreu image, or scores of others that are taken down. Furthermore, the guy who did this is just another red link - someone who doesn't even bother to fill out a user page. It's all a matter of common sense and etiquette - it's not the best analogy, but you just don't go to MySpace or Facebook and start putting useless garbage on other people's pages.
Same goes for Wikipedia - you just don't go around making articles worse, that legitmate volunteers have worked for years to constantly improve. So, I take it upon myself to discourage users who don't add to the site. And yes, I've been blocked permanently from editing Wikipedia, but look what happened to the guy who was the ultimate reason for my block. If I'm a jerk, I'm a jerk towards people who deserve it, and these two most abundantly deserved it. Anyway, sorry this is so long winded. I miss the old days of Wikipedia, when baseball articles were buried on the 10th page of Google results. The quality of the overall work was much better. Take care, and I'll try not to cause you anymore trouble. The former editor Googie Man.65.34.60.77 | 0 |
Laurel Clark, astronaut killed in Columbia disaster.
I found a reference to Laurel Clark being a Unitarian Universalist http://archive.uua.org/news/2003/030214.html and replaced her in List of Unitarians, Universalists, and Unitarian Universalists. Thought you'd like to know. Keep up the good work! | 0 |
"
Hopefully, we'll get this straightened out by then. Also, there's a concern that you are the same editor as user: Agent4453. Can you comment on that? talk " | 0 |
"
Major Garrett
Major Garrett is a congressional correspondent for Fox News. He has also been a White House correspondent for CNN, a senior editor and congressional correspondent for U.S. News and World Report, and a congressional reporter for the Washington Times.http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,60317,00.html His book The Fifteen Biggest Lies in Politics was described as ""calmly reasoned"" by the Indianapolis Star.http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/product-description/0312254598/ref=dp_proddesc_0?ie=UTF8&n;=283155&s;=books He is an alumnus of the Missouri School of Journalism.http://journalism.missouri.edu/alumni/major-garrett-84.html
Controversy
On January 8, 2008, Garrett reported that James Carville and Paul Begala were preparing to join the Clinton campaign, in a major shake-up of the campaign staff.http://www.newshounds.us/2008/01/08/major_garrett_from_fox_says_he_stands_by_his_source_that_begala_and_carville_are_joining_hillarys_team.php Despite strenuous objections from Carvillehttp://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/tag/james-carville/ and Begalahttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/paul-begala/fox-news-we-report-e_b_80698.html, Garrett stood by his story, which later proved to be untrue.http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/01/09/fox-news-wrong-about-carville-and-begala-joining-hillary/
References
" | 0 |
"
Also, that link doesn't work anymore. If it's correct, The Sunday Telegraph might have removed the story from their website. don't talk email me " | 0 |
"::::If your skin is so thin then you got no business taking controversial (and yes, um... wrongful) admin actions.
" | 0 |
"
Great changes - hope you don't mind mine! εαίδεια* " | 0 |
"
Lying about your name?
Were you lying about your name? At one point in time, as Mercury, you signed your name ""Nathan"". When people were trying to figure out who ""NonvocalScream"" was before WordMachine, I heard somewhere your name was Jo(h)n and that name was in your e-mail address. People suspected you were Mercury, but I want to know why you faked your name. This is a sockpuppet account. " | 0 |
James Douglas
What did this poor chap do to deserve being removed from the list of British Midwives? | 0 |
re GA reviews
I replied on my talk page, I guess you haven't seen it. I've reviewed one of your articles so far (only one minor issue holding up promotion). Regards, | 0 |
Updating Vessels
It seems the page (even though there is another page for equipment) seems to be very dated. If anyone has more information it is very needed. | 0 |
RfC on an Article in Which You've Participated
A RfC on an article in which you've commend on has been opened here. This is a courtesy notification you may ignore if it is of no interest. | 0 |
No Wikipedia has a default size and resizes automatically. 230px. WP:IUP says don't resize unless you have to, because of the effect that it has on the visually disabled. Surely you as an admin are familiar with this. In any case, I have show that I regularly attempt to make improvements for the visually disabled, and it has nothing whatsoever to do with Neutralhomer's eyesight. It has to do with mine. | 0 |
"
Google search ""Deadly nightshade"" and uses yields as the first link The entire plant, harvested when coming into flower, is used to make a homeopathic remedy[232]. This is used especially in cases where there is localised and painful inflammation that radiates heat[232]. It is also used to treat sunstroke and painful menstruation[238]." | 0 |
Erm, isn't that what I just said? | 0 |
Self promotional efforts
Mr Root (or his surrogate),
I have started a discussion about your contributions here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam#Stephen_Short. As a courtesy, I am notifying you so that you may know what is up and have a chance to let us know what might be going on. Thanks alot! | 0 |
hey dude, do you always revert good faith edits without comment, even when requested? do you even look at what you're reverting? might i suggest that you do? 86.44.33.121 | 0 |
WP:FILM January 2011 Newsletter
The January 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. Happy editing! (talk • contrib) | 0 |
With Larkusix's additions, it is now up to nearly 9.7K prose text at the very upper end of the too large guideline. | 0 |
"
""Pete, what makes you think you can go around and spread insults and personal attacks? What makes you think that you can call me ""arrogant"" and ""rude"" or kick me while I'm down? I would report you for this ongoing behavior of yours if only I wasn't blocked. But maybe someone will see my page and do just that."" You are appealing your block. I am supporting it. I'm sorry if it feels like an atack to you.
""Further, my ""recruiting"" of other editors is irrelevant."" That's not up to me or you to decide. Administrators are the ones who get to decide if it is relevant.
""Finally, I did discuss these edits."" And the discussions are there for everyone to see. We don't need to go over them here again. You're pushing your POV - and soliciting for meat-puppets on websites that are comprised of Anthroposophists. IMO, until you realize that your behavior in this regard is inappropriate - and not ""irrelevant"" - I think you should be doing some thinking instead of editing. " | 0 |
"
I live in the area and ""Carnival"" is the correct way of referring to it. Been a while since you asked, but hey -) " | 0 |
Cooldown failed
Unfortunately the 24 hour cooldown did not help. is continuing the personal attacks and the elated tone. Calling the other person a liar and using straw men arguments is not a good basis for constructive discussion. | 0 |
The alternative term was in the summary of 9 December and was added to Pathoschild's edits of that version on 10 December. | 0 |
Also, the Makdisi 1999 citation lacks a page, which makes the claim harder to check. It is good practice to remove weasel words when you find them, ideally rewriting the sentence to an unambiguous verifiable statement. | 0 |
"
Unclear sentence
2005 papal election conclave states: ""If Pope Benedict XVI follows the custom of his predecessors in writing a new election constitution, it will also be the last."" What's that supposed to mean? Thanx 12:54, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)" | 0 |
Mt. Hope Tornado
Although this tornado was officially an F4, I'd like to suggest that the Mt. Hope, Alabama tornado of April 3, 1974 be added to the list of possible F5 tornadoes. The SPC's List of F5 and EF5 tornadoes lists it as an F5 and even the List of Super Outbreak tornadoes mentions that some sources list it as an F5. Is there any reason why it isn't in the list of possible F5 tornadoes now? | 0 |
"
Absolutely agree. No relevance to either his on-screen or off-screen persona. (talk) " | 0 |
"
Thank-you Nimbus, I'm becoming increasingly aware of like-minded editors – it's gratifying to know that I'm not alone! Sunset " | 0 |
"
This is the current WikiProject: Ice Hockey Article Improvement Drive collaboration!" | 0 |
glad you're out there! by the way do you know if there is a specific tag for an article which you know to have factual inaccuracies or blatant lies? | 0 |
Ok, in summary, Mark Twain is not a WP:RS because there are accurate estimates of concomitant population, which is contradictory to your earlier statement that There are no accurate estimates of population at the time so laregely scholars can relate to the observations of travelers at the time. This reference and others like it breech WP:RS by not conforming to the subsection Beware false authority
Authority of authors
Prefer authors with an established reputation in the field where Wikipedia uses them for reference.
Mark Twain is a satirist and a writer of fiction, not a respected demographer.
These references are also in breech of
Exceptional claims require exceptional evidence
Claims not supported or claims that are contradicted by the prevailing view in the relevant academic community. Be particularly careful when proponents say there is a conspiracy to silence them.
There is no conspiracy to silence these claims. This account is problematic because Twain's work seems to indicate that the 350,000 people do not exist in Twain's time, or that there are much less people than 350,000 living in Palestine. Verified and peer-reviewed sources indicate that there were 350,000 people in the area concomitant to Twain's visit. Thats what needs to be said in a section on demographics, not the musings of a satirist and fiction author.
Self-published sources
Main article: Wikipedia:VerifiabilityA self-published source is a published source that has not been subject to any form of independent fact-checking, or where no one stands between the writer and the act of publication. It includes personal websites, and books published by vanity presses. Anyone can create a website or pay to have a book published, and then claim to be an expert in a certain field. For that reason, self-published books, personal websites, and blogs are largely not acceptable as sources.Exceptions to this may be when a well-known, professional researcher writing within their field of expertise Twain's work is also in breech of this portion of WP:RS as well. His accounts cannot be considered verified or subject to any form of independent fact-checking. He is also not a well-known, professional researcher writing within their field of expertise.
If we were doing original research or if we did not have good population estimates, then this information would be valuable. Since There are no accurate estimates of population at the time so laregely scholars can relate to the observations of travelers at the time'' is clearly wrong and we do have accurate estimates of population at the time, it is clear that we need to use these and expunge the article of all non-scholarly sources, including the Herbert Samuel link I contributed earler. | 0 |
"
Cheers. But there is only one point of view on money creation. There is no debate - can't be.
So if I find sources that ""prove"" money is dropped by storks it can added as an ""alternative view""??
You are abusing NPOV." | 0 |
"
Tara Smith
Tara C. Smith
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Tara C. Smith, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add to the top of Tara C. Smith. 65.27.204.71 " | 0 |
Cuba
You're quite welcome. Coming from you that means a lot. Also, thanks for your help on the page. I think things are starting to get under control there. | Talk | 0 |
And of course, the AP is never wrong. Wikipedia is for hyper-bloggers with ADD to further promote ignorance in the world, because hey, what else are you going to do? | 0 |
Your Edits
Responding to your inquiry. Your edits do not explicitly cite what is referenced in the external web site which you use. In no where in the Britannica article does it state that John Larson invented the polygraph in 1921. Secondly, Post-it notes, atomic bombs, etc. are nothing but trivial details which have no absolute relation to the topic of the article the polygraph.
My suggestion to you. Add your website as an external link at the bottom of the article. If readers want to learn more about what is contained on Britannica's 2003 list, then they'll have that option. However, that edit which you consistently add, does not add any value to the introduction of an article on the polygraph. | 0 |
Wehwalt, FTR, I'm not objecting to text about the photo, as long as it's sourced and op-ed type peices are noted. (I mean like everthing else) I'm objecting to putting the photo itself in the article as an image. Didn't you say that you thought we should do that? I'm saying... um.. no. Let's NOT do that. | 0 |
July 2009 (UTC)
And here I agree with aggie 100%. Of course she will just say I'm ChatNoir and get me into more trouble. But I say she's right. And the sooner she loses a little monopolgy on this page, the sooner the article gets completed correctly!!76.195.93.15 16:09, 2 | 0 |
I know... I'm getting old and jaded. Time for a vacation. talk | 0 |
Ah go right to hell if it aint on MTV you dont care just goes to show how narrow-minded America is. | 0 |
PS, well that is something at least. Still means we have an unverified article. My suggestion would be rather than 'week keep' would be 'produce references in 4 days or delete without further question'. Thanks for taking and interest (really). -) | 0 |
BTW
I've noticed your page, and with all those little boxes on it, I must say, you are definately one of those no-life wikis! thanks, | 0 |
"
I was not going to reply but have changed my mind after you reinstated your comments when it was obvious I had read them and I could not find a reason or policy for your reinstating them onto my talkpage.
Links 1-5 were appropriate and restrained responses to trolling and inappropriate behaviour on the part of Askolnik. The one you singled out as ""worse"" was an accurate edit.
On 6-10 you obviously did not look at the actual edits; all of them were appropriate edits to articles. Frankly, I am surprised that non-NPOV edits are protected by administrators. Wikistalking has to involve some sort of harassment. Placing citation requests on POV statements (that could be deleted just because they are unsourced} and making other positive edits is not harassment.
I was even more surprised to see an administrator remove a copyvio template when there is obvious copyright violation (Skeptic's Dictionary). I didn't say anything about that, either.
Indeed, I have been very patient in the face of inappropriate behaviour on the part of Askolnick and KarlBunker, including inappropriate comments and ganging up together to evade the 3RR rule to prevent articles from being edited. It is patently unfair for Askolnick and KarlBunker to be allowed to violate Wikpedia policy at will. It appears that they take exception to any attempt to remove POV from an article if it is their POV.
I am more than surprised that you changed a warning into a block merely because I deleted harassing, unfounded attacks placed on my talk page by Askolnik even after I requested him not to.
It's not as if I'm the first person they've harassed and I'm surprised to see administrative support and tacit approval of their actions. - " | 0 |
Merge?
Qatarson created Denmark boycott which is not only a poor title, but probably consists only of info that can be safely merged here. Thoughts? | 0 |
I find it amusing that I am accused of using multiple accounts when the only account I have is this one, however I am used to false charges being brought against be by B&Q.;
It has become apparent to me that wikipedia is not interested in a truth but more in advertising revenue. | 0 |
Doctor Doom
Isn't Doctor Doom an enemy of Iron Man? | 0 |
MY OWN PAGE HOWEVER I LIKE IT | 0 |
Cant add steel cage link
I cant seem to add the link to the steel cage article. | 0 |
Please, cite your sources. | 0 |
Neurodevelopmental insults
I would like to suggest that the first paragraph of this article describe schizophrenia as a neurodevelopmental disease, possibly in addition to being a mental illness. I am reading the book Origins of Schizophrenia''', published 2012 by Columbia University Press, and chapter 1 (page 25) says [quote]In recent years, evidence has accumulated in support of a role for neurodevelopmental insults in the etiopathogenesis of schizophrenia (Brown, 2011). The dramatic changes in brain structure and function cron conception to birth underscore the particular vulnerability to insults during this stage of development with regard to both short- and long-term disease outcomes (Tau & Peterson, 2010). Hence, the determinants of detal brain development- both genes and environmental factors- deserve consideration as potential risk factors for schizophrenia.[/quote] This scholarly book is summarizing the most recent scientific consensus on this terrible disease and it is pointing to schizophrenia as a neurological issue more than it is a mental health issue. Thank you. 140.247.141.165 | 0 |
While things are protected...
I found it refreshing to edit on the libertarian wiki. I transplanted the last good version of the anarchism article there. You know, with the individualist/collectivist structure that we worked on after the last unprotect. I merged your Individual anarchism and American individual anarchism articles - that was obviously an edit war fork. Anyway, check these out:
Anarchism
Individualist anarchism | 0 |
I read that and I'm not sure exactly how to do the referencing project thing but I will post the list. And alot of these singers sing in whistle very well my favorites are Toya Alexis, Shoshana Bean, Tamar Braxton, Tisha Campbell, Blu Cantrell, Mariah, Kelly Clarkson, Terry Ellis, Lisa Fischer, Nina Girado, Vivian Green, Jennifer Hudson, JoJo, Lani Misalucha, and Shanice. | 0 |
"PLEASE think before you edit war by blanking pages or putting questionable unsourced information in. She got into enough trouble over false information on the bio (such as age) the Democrats submitted the day of Issa's hearing, even though there is no evidence that SHE submitted it (and probably didn't). The information in her school bios has statements that aren't supported by the evidence, though they may be ""slightly"" true. All the ""co-founded"" and ""sat on panel"" and ""initiated"", when the rosters are published and she isn't on them are considered ""exaggeration"" on a Law school application, but considered lies on an application for a real job. She has not submitted them to an encyclopedia, where they would also be considered lies, don't you do it. There is a different standard for veracity.
AND the vandalism of other people's comments by deleting them is not allowed. Stop it.
DONE BY 03:11, 16 March 2012 Goethean (talk | contribs) . . (103,103 bytes) (-816)209.6.69.227
" | 0 |
":Re SkyEarth's precepts:
It is perfectly acceptable to refer to ""violent acts"", to differentiate them from ""non-violent acts""
The quotation is not false, but it could certainly be made more precise. But why bother? This isn't an article about the Arab and Muslim world, it's an article about Hezbollah. Only H's views (and outside analysis of H's views) need to be reported.
Jihad is perfectly acceptable; Hezbollah has used it to characterize its actions.
""resistance"" is how H describes its violent actions; others describe their violent actions using other terms. Care should be taken to maintain the integrity of paraphrased statements.
Finish however you like.
" | 0 |
Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing''' | 0 |
"
You'd be surprised to know that I really don't have any repetitive interests...unlike what that article stipulates! Mind you, I don't have a severe case of it, unlike other people that I have came across. (talk) " | 0 |
(a project made possible by the rarity of the name | 0 |
"
Your comment was so spot-on that I couldn't help shifting it to the comments page of that essay. (Talk?) [ (New thread?)] " | 0 |
"Welcome
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits, such as the ones to the page Deir el-Bahari, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the ""sandbox"" rather than in articles.
If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Help pages
Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of User talk:Darkwindmy talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — " | 0 |
"
Survey, please take part
Please sign your name using four tildes ( ) under the position you support, preferably adding a brief comment. Extended commentary should be placed below in the discussion section, thanks.
A/ Add the words ""convicted paedophile"" to the opening sentence, similar to the article for Gary Glitter.
B/Happy with the opening section of this article.
'Discussion' " | 0 |
"
I'd guess this is a single individual with a dynamic IP address. If he can reset his address by unplugging his dsl or cable modem or forcing a DHCP reset, there is no point to a long term block. 24 hours is probably more than sufficient, by that time he will have moved on to another address. I gather there are some ""senior"" people working on this (other checkusers, arbcom, etc.) Thatcher " | 0 |
Actually, a lot of anthropologists would dispute that there are racial gaps in IQ, not least because (as people who actually study the subject of 'race', rather than just making generalisations about it), they are aware that 'race' is a complex social construct, rather that a simplistic biological 'fact'. Actually, I suspect many would argue that the same can be said for 'intelligence' too. | 0 |
In case my words were misconstrued, I was not criticizing your POV and indeed I also believe that it is easier to avoid writing in a POV style when others are aware of what your POV is. It is exactly this reason why I noted that your contributions seem to tend towards your POV. As for my own POV, if one can call it that, I don't have an in depth knowledge of the subject and I'm not Roman Catholic. I merely stumbled upon an article which seemed to have two editors with conflicting ideas (Jonathan Tweet and Lima) and as such I hope to format current information rather than introduce new information. I feel I am fairly unbiased, but I believe that the lead should deal more with the definition and explanation of the subject matter than going in depth about its history or disputation. As for going forward, I suggest the following. Once we receive GoldenMeadows' lead draft we'll have three drafts, from which we can choose one to refine and extend (probably incorporating elements from the other drafts as well). Hopefully this will result in a lead which both follows Wikipedia's principles and is accepted by all. | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.