text
stringlengths
0
238k
actively ignored". [19] According to James Gracey, author of a book about
Argento's work, with Tenebrae Argento "explores some of his most reoccurring
themes and preoccupations, such as Freudian psychology , sexual deviancy ,
repressed trauma, voyeurism , audience spectatorship, and the fetishisation of
violence and death." [20] Water is often associated visually with Neal. In
almost all his scenes his appearance is followed or accompanied by a shot of
water. [21] Later, this device is used repeatedly as a clue to the ultimate
killer's identity – Neal himself. [22] Dark doubles [ edit ] The reveal of
Peter Neal standing behind Detective Giermani emphasizes Argento's theme of
"dark doubles", with the film constantly doubling or mirroring objects,
locations, events and characters. [23] This scene is one of many that sets up
a character with his or her doppelgänger, on both a visual and narrative
level. [17] The moment is also one of Tenebrae ' s most stylistically
influential; the reveal of a killer – previously silhouetted by another – has
been copied and referenced in many subsequent thrillers, [24] including Brian
De Palma 's Raising Cain (1992). [25] According to Argento expert Thomas
Rostock, Tenebrae is filled with rhyming imagery that relates to the film's
exploration of "the dual nature of [the] two active murderers" using doubles,
inversions, reflections and "re-reflections". Every major character has at
least one double, and the theme extends to objects, locations, actions, and
events – major and minor. [23] The doubling or mirroring of incidents and
objects includes telephone booths, aircraft, homeless men, otherwise-
meaningless public brawls in the background, car accidents, typewriters
(literally side-by-side), keys, handkerchief, hands caught in doors and the
characters themselves. [26] Rostock cites several scenes where characters are
set up in the frame with their doppelgängers – one such is the first meeting
of Peter Neal and Anne with Detectives Giermani and Altieri. [17] McDonagh
notes that Argento emphasizes the doubling between Neal and Giermani:
"Giermani ... is made to reflect Neal even as Neal appropriates his role as
investigator ... the detective/writer and the writer/detective each belittles
his other half, as though by being demeaned this inverted reflection could be
made to go away." McDonagh also observes that, in what is arguably the film's
most potent shock, Neal at one point really does make Giermani "go away",
virtually replacing him on screen "in a shot that is as schematically logical
as it is logically outrageous." [27] Earlier, Neal killed a woman who – to his
and the audience's surprise – was not Anne, but Altieri. [23] Tenebrae itself
is split almost exactly into two parts. The first half belongs to the murders
of Berti; the second to those of Neal. The two are set up as mirrors of one
another. Berti's killings with a razor are clinical, with "lingering
sexualized aggressiveness", whereas Neal's (with an axe) are crimes of passion
committed for personal reasons or out of necessity; they are swift and to the
point. [16] Kevin Lyons observes, "The plot revolves around the audacious and
quite unexpected transference of guilt from the maniacal killer (about whom we
learn very little, itself unusual for Argento) to the eminently likeable hero,
surely the film's boldest stroke." [28] While noting that the device is
"striking", McDonagh comments that this transmission of guilt occurs between
two dark doubles who are severely "warped" individuals. She suggests that
"Neal and Berti ... act as mirrors to one another, each twisting the
reflection into a warped parody of the other." [29] Berti's obsession with
Neal's fiction compels him to commit murder in homage to the writer, while
Neal seems to think that his own violent acts are simply part of some kind of
"elaborate fiction". When the bloody Neal is confronted by Giermani
immediately after having killed numerous people, Neal screams at him, "It was
like a book ... a book!" [30] Metafiction [ edit ] The moment in which the
first half of the movie transitions into the second is punctuated by the
rising score and camera pan to an ostensibly meaningless point of reflected
light on an ornament. According to Rostock, the meaning behind this movement
is clear: it marks the spot when Berti's spree ends and Neal's rampage begins.
[31] Argento uses the shift in focus to comment on the shaping of the film
itself, until that moment a typical, "clichéd and remote" giallo . Neal,
previously passive, begins to control what happens in his own story, which is
more personal with "weight and meaning". According to Rostock, this structure
allows Argento equal scope to play with the narrative while commenting upon
it, all without having to deviate from the advancement of the plot. [32]
According to Kim Newman, the use of a sculpture as a weapon makes literal one
of the themes of the film: "art that kills people". [5] Rostock concurs,
saying that as the film is a commentary on art, the only weapon that can end
the narrative is art itself. [22] According to Gracey, many have compared
Argento with the character of Peter Neal, speculating that he serves as an
alter-ego for the director. [33] Gracey refers to Tenebrae as a "reflexive
commentary on [the director's] earlier work." [30] The director himself saw
the film in the same light, claiming it was a reaction to accusations that
"[he] was a misogynist ... a criminal ... a murderer." Argento resolved to
include all these aspects of his previous films into Tenebrae . [34] A scene
in which a woman criticizes the lead character's books as "sexist", featuring
"women as victims, cipers, male heroes [and] macho bullshit" echoes criticisms
of Argento's own work. [6] Kim Newman calls the confrontation scene
"essentially autobiographical", [35] and refuting these accusations Argento
said that his films were instead an attempt to tackle his dark side, to "let
it speak". With Tenebrae in particular, he felt he was making a joke or
playing a game with his critics, creating a front or mystique about himself.
[34] Rostock also believes Argento is having fun and sending up this
perception. [36] Newman agrees that Argento used Tenebrae to address his own
public image, the notion that someone who creates art as "sick and twisted" as
his, must himself be sick and twisted. With Tenebrae ' s reveal that the
author is the killer, Newman argues that Argento is saying, "What if I were?"
[5] "Aberrant" sexuality [ edit ] As in many of Argento's films, which
apparently tend to eroticize the murder of beautiful women, [37] gender,
sexuality, and power are major issues foregrounded by the film. [38] The
fictional novel within the film is described as being "about human perversion
and its effects on society". [39] Male and female sexual deviancy is a central
theme, with the victims being sexually liberated women who the first killer –
conservative TV presenter Cristiano Berti – refers to as "filthy, slimy
perverts". [20] The first victim is a sexually promiscuous shoplifter, and his
next two are the lesbian reporter and her bisexual lover. Berti murders the
comparatively normal Maria only because she inadvertently discovers his
twisted compulsion. [40] His "moral crusade" is inspired by – and in his mind
given credibility by – Neal's novel. Neal's own motivations for becoming a
killer are revealed in "Freudian flashbacks". As summarized by McDonagh, these
flashbacks "expose how the misogyny evident in his books actually stems from