blob_id stringlengths 40 40 | directory_id stringlengths 40 40 | path stringlengths 7 139 | content_id stringlengths 40 40 | detected_licenses listlengths 0 16 | license_type stringclasses 2
values | repo_name stringlengths 7 55 | snapshot_id stringlengths 40 40 | revision_id stringlengths 40 40 | branch_name stringclasses 6
values | visit_date int64 1,471B 1,694B | revision_date int64 1,378B 1,694B | committer_date int64 1,378B 1,694B | github_id float64 1.33M 604M ⌀ | star_events_count int64 0 43.5k | fork_events_count int64 0 1.5k | gha_license_id stringclasses 6
values | gha_event_created_at int64 1,402B 1,695B ⌀ | gha_created_at int64 1,359B 1,637B ⌀ | gha_language stringclasses 19
values | src_encoding stringclasses 2
values | language stringclasses 1
value | is_vendor bool 1
class | is_generated bool 1
class | length_bytes int64 3 6.4M | extension stringclasses 4
values | content stringlengths 3 6.12M |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
cfb150cba7842e1033a871f07188c672d740e25c | 367134ba5a65885e863bdc4507601606690974c1 | /src/category_theory/comma.lean | 353c2675b75fec6cd677f5562a3901c45c6ed69b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kodyvajjha/mathlib | 9bead00e90f68269a313f45f5561766cfd8d5cad | b98af5dd79e13a38d84438b850a2e8858ec21284 | refs/heads/master | 1,624,350,366,310 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 162,666,963 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,545,367,651,000 | 1,545,367,651,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,395 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Johan Commelin, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import category_theory.natural_isomorphism
/-!
# Comma categories
A comma category is a construction in category theory, which builds a category out of two functors
with a common codomain. Specifically, for functors `L : A ⥤ T` and `R : B ⥤ T`, an object in
`comma L R` is a morphism `hom : L.obj left ⟶ R.obj right` for some objects `left : A` and
`right : B`, and a morphism in `comma L R` between `hom : L.obj left ⟶ R.obj right` and
`hom' : L.obj left' ⟶ R.obj right'` is a commutative square
```
L.obj left ⟶ L.obj left'
| |
hom | | hom'
↓ ↓
R.obj right ⟶ R.obj right',
```
where the top and bottom morphism come from morphisms `left ⟶ left'` and `right ⟶ right'`,
respectively.
## Main definitions
* `comma L R`: the comma category of the functors `L` and `R`.
* `over X`: the over category of the object `X` (developed in `over.lean`).
* `under X`: the under category of the object `X` (also developed in `over.lean`).
* `arrow T`: the arrow category of the category `T` (developed in `arrow.lean`).
## References
* <https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/comma+category>
## Tags
comma, slice, coslice, over, under, arrow
-/
namespace category_theory
-- declare the `v`'s first; see `category_theory.category` for an explanation
universes v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
variables {A : Type u₁} [category.{v₁} A]
variables {B : Type u₂} [category.{v₂} B]
variables {T : Type u₃} [category.{v₃} T]
/-- The objects of the comma category are triples of an object `left : A`, an object
`right : B` and a morphism `hom : L.obj left ⟶ R.obj right`. -/
structure comma (L : A ⥤ T) (R : B ⥤ T) : Type (max u₁ u₂ v₃) :=
(left : A . obviously)
(right : B . obviously)
(hom : L.obj left ⟶ R.obj right)
-- Satisfying the inhabited linter
instance comma.inhabited [inhabited T] : inhabited (comma (𝟭 T) (𝟭 T)) :=
{ default :=
{ left := default T,
right := default T,
hom := 𝟙 (default T) } }
variables {L : A ⥤ T} {R : B ⥤ T}
/-- A morphism between two objects in the comma category is a commutative square connecting the
morphisms coming from the two objects using morphisms in the image of the functors `L` and `R`.
-/
@[ext] structure comma_morphism (X Y : comma L R) :=
(left : X.left ⟶ Y.left . obviously)
(right : X.right ⟶ Y.right . obviously)
(w' : L.map left ≫ Y.hom = X.hom ≫ R.map right . obviously)
-- Satisfying the inhabited linter
instance comma_morphism.inhabited [inhabited (comma L R)] :
inhabited (comma_morphism (default (comma L R)) (default (comma L R))) :=
{ default :=
{ left := 𝟙 _,
right := 𝟙 _ } }
restate_axiom comma_morphism.w'
attribute [simp, reassoc] comma_morphism.w
instance comma_category : category (comma L R) :=
{ hom := comma_morphism,
id := λ X,
{ left := 𝟙 X.left,
right := 𝟙 X.right },
comp := λ X Y Z f g,
{ left := f.left ≫ g.left,
right := f.right ≫ g.right } }
namespace comma
section
variables {X Y Z : comma L R} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : Y ⟶ Z}
@[simp] lemma id_left : ((𝟙 X) : comma_morphism X X).left = 𝟙 X.left := rfl
@[simp] lemma id_right : ((𝟙 X) : comma_morphism X X).right = 𝟙 X.right := rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_left : (f ≫ g).left = f.left ≫ g.left := rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_right : (f ≫ g).right = f.right ≫ g.right := rfl
end
variables (L) (R)
/-- The functor sending an object `X` in the comma category to `X.left`. -/
@[simps]
def fst : comma L R ⥤ A :=
{ obj := λ X, X.left,
map := λ _ _ f, f.left }
/-- The functor sending an object `X` in the comma category to `X.right`. -/
@[simps]
def snd : comma L R ⥤ B :=
{ obj := λ X, X.right,
map := λ _ _ f, f.right }
/-- We can interpret the commutative square constituting a morphism in the comma category as a
natural transformation between the functors `fst ⋙ L` and `snd ⋙ R` from the comma category
to `T`, where the components are given by the morphism that constitutes an object of the comma
category. -/
@[simps]
def nat_trans : fst L R ⋙ L ⟶ snd L R ⋙ R :=
{ app := λ X, X.hom }
section
variables {L₁ L₂ L₃ : A ⥤ T} {R₁ R₂ R₃ : B ⥤ T}
/--
Construct an isomorphism in the comma category given isomorphisms of the objects whose forward
directions give a commutative square.
-/
@[simps]
def iso_mk {X Y : comma L₁ R₁} (l : X.left ≅ Y.left) (r : X.right ≅ Y.right)
(h : L₁.map l.hom ≫ Y.hom = X.hom ≫ R₁.map r.hom) : X ≅ Y :=
{ hom := { left := l.hom, right := r.hom },
inv :=
{ left := l.inv,
right := r.inv,
w' := by { erw [L₁.map_inv l.hom, iso.inv_comp_eq, reassoc_of h, ← R₁.map_comp], simp } } }
/-- A natural transformation `L₁ ⟶ L₂` induces a functor `comma L₂ R ⥤ comma L₁ R`. -/
@[simps]
def map_left (l : L₁ ⟶ L₂) : comma L₂ R ⥤ comma L₁ R :=
{ obj := λ X,
{ left := X.left,
right := X.right,
hom := l.app X.left ≫ X.hom },
map := λ X Y f,
{ left := f.left,
right := f.right } }
/-- The functor `comma L R ⥤ comma L R` induced by the identity natural transformation on `L` is
naturally isomorphic to the identity functor. -/
@[simps]
def map_left_id : map_left R (𝟙 L) ≅ 𝟭 _ :=
{ hom :=
{ app := λ X, { left := 𝟙 _, right := 𝟙 _ } },
inv :=
{ app := λ X, { left := 𝟙 _, right := 𝟙 _ } } }
/-- The functor `comma L₁ R ⥤ comma L₃ R` induced by the composition of two natural transformations
`l : L₁ ⟶ L₂` and `l' : L₂ ⟶ L₃` is naturally isomorphic to the composition of the two functors
induced by these natural transformations. -/
@[simps]
def map_left_comp (l : L₁ ⟶ L₂) (l' : L₂ ⟶ L₃) :
(map_left R (l ≫ l')) ≅ (map_left R l') ⋙ (map_left R l) :=
{ hom :=
{ app := λ X, { left := 𝟙 _, right := 𝟙 _ } },
inv :=
{ app := λ X, { left := 𝟙 _, right := 𝟙 _ } } }
/-- A natural transformation `R₁ ⟶ R₂` induces a functor `comma L R₁ ⥤ comma L R₂`. -/
@[simps]
def map_right (r : R₁ ⟶ R₂) : comma L R₁ ⥤ comma L R₂ :=
{ obj := λ X,
{ left := X.left,
right := X.right,
hom := X.hom ≫ r.app X.right },
map := λ X Y f,
{ left := f.left,
right := f.right } }
/-- The functor `comma L R ⥤ comma L R` induced by the identity natural transformation on `R` is
naturally isomorphic to the identity functor. -/
@[simps]
def map_right_id : map_right L (𝟙 R) ≅ 𝟭 _ :=
{ hom :=
{ app := λ X, { left := 𝟙 _, right := 𝟙 _ } },
inv :=
{ app := λ X, { left := 𝟙 _, right := 𝟙 _ } } }
/-- The functor `comma L R₁ ⥤ comma L R₃` induced by the composition of the natural transformations
`r : R₁ ⟶ R₂` and `r' : R₂ ⟶ R₃` is naturally isomorphic to the composition of the functors
induced by these natural transformations. -/
@[simps]
def map_right_comp (r : R₁ ⟶ R₂) (r' : R₂ ⟶ R₃) :
(map_right L (r ≫ r')) ≅ (map_right L r) ⋙ (map_right L r') :=
{ hom :=
{ app := λ X, { left := 𝟙 _, right := 𝟙 _ } },
inv :=
{ app := λ X, { left := 𝟙 _, right := 𝟙 _ } } }
end
end comma
end category_theory
|
594a83194004de09835c93569d68b877bdcabec0 | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/algebra/big_operators/finsupp.lean | 3ebc4941540447e383d8239eac2686ce4bcb865d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 23,214 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import data.finsupp.indicator
import algebra.big_operators.pi
import algebra.big_operators.ring
import algebra.big_operators.order
import group_theory.submonoid.membership
/-!
# Big operators for finsupps
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
This file contains theorems relevant to big operators in finitely supported functions.
-/
noncomputable theory
open finset function
open_locale big_operators
variables {α ι γ A B C : Type*} [add_comm_monoid A] [add_comm_monoid B] [add_comm_monoid C]
variables {t : ι → A → C} (h0 : ∀ i, t i 0 = 0) (h1 : ∀ i x y, t i (x + y) = t i x + t i y)
variables {s : finset α} {f : α → (ι →₀ A)} (i : ι)
variables (g : ι →₀ A) (k : ι → A → γ → B) (x : γ)
variables {β M M' N P G H R S : Type*}
namespace finsupp
/-!
### Declarations about `sum` and `prod`
In most of this section, the domain `β` is assumed to be an `add_monoid`.
-/
section sum_prod
/-- `prod f g` is the product of `g a (f a)` over the support of `f`. -/
@[to_additive "`sum f g` is the sum of `g a (f a)` over the support of `f`. "]
def prod [has_zero M] [comm_monoid N] (f : α →₀ M) (g : α → M → N) : N :=
∏ a in f.support, g a (f a)
variables [has_zero M] [has_zero M'] [comm_monoid N]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_of_support_subset (f : α →₀ M) {s : finset α}
(hs : f.support ⊆ s) (g : α → M → N) (h : ∀ i ∈ s, g i 0 = 1) :
f.prod g = ∏ x in s, g x (f x) :=
finset.prod_subset hs $ λ x hxs hx, h x hxs ▸ congr_arg (g x) $ not_mem_support_iff.1 hx
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fintype [fintype α] (f : α →₀ M) (g : α → M → N) (h : ∀ i, g i 0 = 1) :
f.prod g = ∏ i, g i (f i) :=
f.prod_of_support_subset (subset_univ _) g (λ x _, h x)
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma prod_single_index {a : α} {b : M} {h : α → M → N} (h_zero : h a 0 = 1) :
(single a b).prod h = h a b :=
calc (single a b).prod h = ∏ x in {a}, h x (single a b x) :
prod_of_support_subset _ support_single_subset h $
λ x hx, (mem_singleton.1 hx).symm ▸ h_zero
... = h a b : by simp
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_map_range_index {f : M → M'} {hf : f 0 = 0} {g : α →₀ M} {h : α → M' → N}
(h0 : ∀a, h a 0 = 1) : (map_range f hf g).prod h = g.prod (λa b, h a (f b)) :=
finset.prod_subset support_map_range $ λ _ _ H,
by rw [not_mem_support_iff.1 H, h0]
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma prod_zero_index {h : α → M → N} : (0 : α →₀ M).prod h = 1 := rfl
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_comm (f : α →₀ M) (g : β →₀ M') (h : α → M → β → M' → N) :
f.prod (λ x v, g.prod (λ x' v', h x v x' v')) = g.prod (λ x' v', f.prod (λ x v, h x v x' v')) :=
finset.prod_comm
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma prod_ite_eq [decidable_eq α] (f : α →₀ M) (a : α) (b : α → M → N) :
f.prod (λ x v, ite (a = x) (b x v) 1) = ite (a ∈ f.support) (b a (f a)) 1 :=
by { dsimp [finsupp.prod], rw f.support.prod_ite_eq, }
@[simp] lemma sum_ite_self_eq
[decidable_eq α] {N : Type*} [add_comm_monoid N] (f : α →₀ N) (a : α) :
f.sum (λ x v, ite (a = x) v 0) = f a :=
begin
classical,
convert f.sum_ite_eq a (λ x, id),
simp [ite_eq_right_iff.2 eq.symm]
end
/-- A restatement of `prod_ite_eq` with the equality test reversed. -/
@[simp, to_additive "A restatement of `sum_ite_eq` with the equality test reversed."]
lemma prod_ite_eq' [decidable_eq α] (f : α →₀ M) (a : α) (b : α → M → N) :
f.prod (λ x v, ite (x = a) (b x v) 1) = ite (a ∈ f.support) (b a (f a)) 1 :=
by { dsimp [finsupp.prod], rw f.support.prod_ite_eq', }
@[simp] lemma sum_ite_self_eq'
[decidable_eq α] {N : Type*} [add_comm_monoid N] (f : α →₀ N) (a : α) :
f.sum (λ x v, ite (x = a) v 0) = f a :=
begin
classical,
convert f.sum_ite_eq' a (λ x, id),
simp [ite_eq_right_iff.2 eq.symm]
end
@[simp] lemma prod_pow [fintype α] (f : α →₀ ℕ) (g : α → N) :
f.prod (λ a b, g a ^ b) = ∏ a, g a ^ (f a) :=
f.prod_fintype _ $ λ a, pow_zero _
/-- If `g` maps a second argument of 0 to 1, then multiplying it over the
result of `on_finset` is the same as multiplying it over the original
`finset`. -/
@[to_additive "If `g` maps a second argument of 0 to 0, summing it over the
result of `on_finset` is the same as summing it over the original
`finset`."]
lemma on_finset_prod {s : finset α} {f : α → M} {g : α → M → N}
(hf : ∀a, f a ≠ 0 → a ∈ s) (hg : ∀ a, g a 0 = 1) :
(on_finset s f hf).prod g = ∏ a in s, g a (f a) :=
finset.prod_subset support_on_finset_subset $ by simp [*] { contextual := tt }
/-- Taking a product over `f : α →₀ M` is the same as multiplying the value on a single element
`y ∈ f.support` by the product over `erase y f`. -/
@[to_additive /-" Taking a sum over over `f : α →₀ M` is the same as adding the value on a
single element `y ∈ f.support` to the sum over `erase y f`. "-/]
lemma mul_prod_erase (f : α →₀ M) (y : α) (g : α → M → N) (hyf : y ∈ f.support) :
g y (f y) * (erase y f).prod g = f.prod g :=
begin
classical,
rw [finsupp.prod, finsupp.prod, ←finset.mul_prod_erase _ _ hyf, finsupp.support_erase,
finset.prod_congr rfl],
intros h hx,
rw finsupp.erase_ne (ne_of_mem_erase hx),
end
/-- Generalization of `finsupp.mul_prod_erase`: if `g` maps a second argument of 0 to 1,
then its product over `f : α →₀ M` is the same as multiplying the value on any element
`y : α` by the product over `erase y f`. -/
@[to_additive /-" Generalization of `finsupp.add_sum_erase`: if `g` maps a second argument of 0
to 0, then its sum over `f : α →₀ M` is the same as adding the value on any element
`y : α` to the sum over `erase y f`. "-/]
lemma mul_prod_erase' (f : α →₀ M) (y : α) (g : α → M → N) (hg : ∀ (i : α), g i 0 = 1) :
g y (f y) * (erase y f).prod g = f.prod g :=
begin
classical,
by_cases hyf : y ∈ f.support,
{ exact finsupp.mul_prod_erase f y g hyf },
{ rw [not_mem_support_iff.mp hyf, hg y, erase_of_not_mem_support hyf, one_mul] },
end
@[to_additive]
lemma _root_.submonoid_class.finsupp_prod_mem {S : Type*} [set_like S N] [submonoid_class S N]
(s : S) (f : α →₀ M) (g : α → M → N) (h : ∀ c, f c ≠ 0 → g c (f c) ∈ s) : f.prod g ∈ s :=
prod_mem $ λ i hi, h _ (finsupp.mem_support_iff.mp hi)
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_congr {f : α →₀ M} {g1 g2 : α → M → N}
(h : ∀ x ∈ f.support, g1 x (f x) = g2 x (f x)) : f.prod g1 = f.prod g2 :=
finset.prod_congr rfl h
end sum_prod
end finsupp
@[to_additive]
lemma map_finsupp_prod [has_zero M] [comm_monoid N] [comm_monoid P] {H : Type*}
[monoid_hom_class H N P] (h : H) (f : α →₀ M) (g : α → M → N) :
h (f.prod g) = f.prod (λ a b, h (g a b)) :=
map_prod h _ _
/-- Deprecated, use `_root_.map_finsupp_prod` instead. -/
@[to_additive "Deprecated, use `_root_.map_finsupp_sum` instead."]
protected lemma mul_equiv.map_finsupp_prod [has_zero M] [comm_monoid N] [comm_monoid P]
(h : N ≃* P) (f : α →₀ M) (g : α → M → N) : h (f.prod g) = f.prod (λ a b, h (g a b)) :=
map_finsupp_prod h f g
/-- Deprecated, use `_root_.map_finsupp_prod` instead. -/
@[to_additive "Deprecated, use `_root_.map_finsupp_sum` instead."]
protected lemma monoid_hom.map_finsupp_prod [has_zero M] [comm_monoid N] [comm_monoid P]
(h : N →* P) (f : α →₀ M) (g : α → M → N) : h (f.prod g) = f.prod (λ a b, h (g a b)) :=
map_finsupp_prod h f g
/-- Deprecated, use `_root_.map_finsupp_sum` instead. -/
protected lemma ring_hom.map_finsupp_sum [has_zero M] [semiring R] [semiring S]
(h : R →+* S) (f : α →₀ M) (g : α → M → R) : h (f.sum g) = f.sum (λ a b, h (g a b)) :=
map_finsupp_sum h f g
/-- Deprecated, use `_root_.map_finsupp_prod` instead. -/
protected lemma ring_hom.map_finsupp_prod [has_zero M] [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring S]
(h : R →+* S) (f : α →₀ M) (g : α → M → R) : h (f.prod g) = f.prod (λ a b, h (g a b)) :=
map_finsupp_prod h f g
@[to_additive]
lemma monoid_hom.coe_finsupp_prod [has_zero β] [monoid N] [comm_monoid P]
(f : α →₀ β) (g : α → β → N →* P) :
⇑(f.prod g) = f.prod (λ i fi, g i fi) :=
monoid_hom.coe_finset_prod _ _
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma monoid_hom.finsupp_prod_apply [has_zero β] [monoid N] [comm_monoid P]
(f : α →₀ β) (g : α → β → N →* P) (x : N) :
f.prod g x = f.prod (λ i fi, g i fi x) :=
monoid_hom.finset_prod_apply _ _ _
namespace finsupp
lemma single_multiset_sum [add_comm_monoid M] (s : multiset M) (a : α) :
single a s.sum = (s.map (single a)).sum :=
multiset.induction_on s (single_zero _) $ λ a s ih,
by rw [multiset.sum_cons, single_add, ih, multiset.map_cons, multiset.sum_cons]
lemma single_finset_sum [add_comm_monoid M] (s : finset ι) (f : ι → M) (a : α) :
single a (∑ b in s, f b) = ∑ b in s, single a (f b) :=
begin
transitivity,
apply single_multiset_sum,
rw [multiset.map_map],
refl
end
lemma single_sum [has_zero M] [add_comm_monoid N] (s : ι →₀ M) (f : ι → M → N) (a : α) :
single a (s.sum f) = s.sum (λd c, single a (f d c)) :=
single_finset_sum _ _ _
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_neg_index [add_group G] [comm_monoid M] {g : α →₀ G} {h : α → G → M}
(h0 : ∀a, h a 0 = 1) :
(-g).prod h = g.prod (λa b, h a (- b)) :=
prod_map_range_index h0
end finsupp
namespace finsupp
lemma finset_sum_apply [add_comm_monoid N] (S : finset ι) (f : ι → α →₀ N) (a : α) :
(∑ i in S, f i) a = ∑ i in S, f i a :=
(apply_add_hom a : (α →₀ N) →+ _).map_sum _ _
@[simp] lemma sum_apply [has_zero M] [add_comm_monoid N]
{f : α →₀ M} {g : α → M → β →₀ N} {a₂ : β} :
(f.sum g) a₂ = f.sum (λa₁ b, g a₁ b a₂) :=
finset_sum_apply _ _ _
lemma coe_finset_sum [add_comm_monoid N] (S : finset ι) (f : ι → α →₀ N) :
⇑(∑ i in S, f i) = ∑ i in S, f i :=
(coe_fn_add_hom : (α →₀ N) →+ _).map_sum _ _
lemma coe_sum [has_zero M] [add_comm_monoid N] (f : α →₀ M) (g : α → M → β →₀ N) :
⇑(f.sum g) = f.sum (λ a₁ b, g a₁ b) :=
coe_finset_sum _ _
lemma support_sum [decidable_eq β] [has_zero M] [add_comm_monoid N]
{f : α →₀ M} {g : α → M → (β →₀ N)} :
(f.sum g).support ⊆ f.support.bUnion (λa, (g a (f a)).support) :=
have ∀ c, f.sum (λ a b, g a b c) ≠ 0 → (∃ a, f a ≠ 0 ∧ ¬ (g a (f a)) c = 0),
from assume a₁ h,
let ⟨a, ha, ne⟩ := finset.exists_ne_zero_of_sum_ne_zero h in
⟨a, mem_support_iff.mp ha, ne⟩,
by simpa only [finset.subset_iff, mem_support_iff, finset.mem_bUnion, sum_apply, exists_prop]
lemma support_finset_sum [decidable_eq β] [add_comm_monoid M] {s : finset α} {f : α → (β →₀ M)} :
(finset.sum s f).support ⊆ s.bUnion (λ x, (f x).support) :=
begin
rw ←finset.sup_eq_bUnion,
induction s using finset.cons_induction_on with a s ha ih,
{ refl },
{ rw [finset.sum_cons, finset.sup_cons],
exact support_add.trans (finset.union_subset_union (finset.subset.refl _) ih), },
end
@[simp] lemma sum_zero [has_zero M] [add_comm_monoid N] {f : α →₀ M} :
f.sum (λa b, (0 : N)) = 0 :=
finset.sum_const_zero
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma prod_mul [has_zero M] [comm_monoid N] {f : α →₀ M} {h₁ h₂ : α → M → N} :
f.prod (λa b, h₁ a b * h₂ a b) = f.prod h₁ * f.prod h₂ :=
finset.prod_mul_distrib
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma prod_inv [has_zero M] [comm_group G] {f : α →₀ M}
{h : α → M → G} : f.prod (λa b, (h a b)⁻¹) = (f.prod h)⁻¹ :=
(map_prod ((monoid_hom.id G)⁻¹) _ _).symm
@[simp] lemma sum_sub [has_zero M] [add_comm_group G] {f : α →₀ M}
{h₁ h₂ : α → M → G} :
f.sum (λa b, h₁ a b - h₂ a b) = f.sum h₁ - f.sum h₂ :=
finset.sum_sub_distrib
/-- Taking the product under `h` is an additive-to-multiplicative homomorphism of finsupps,
if `h` is an additive-to-multiplicative homomorphism on the support.
This is a more general version of `finsupp.prod_add_index'`; the latter has simpler hypotheses. -/
@[to_additive "Taking the product under `h` is an additive homomorphism of finsupps,
if `h` is an additive homomorphism on the support.
This is a more general version of `finsupp.sum_add_index'`; the latter has simpler hypotheses."]
lemma prod_add_index [decidable_eq α] [add_zero_class M] [comm_monoid N] {f g : α →₀ M}
{h : α → M → N} (h_zero : ∀ a ∈ f.support ∪ g.support, h a 0 = 1)
(h_add : ∀ (a ∈ f.support ∪ g.support) b₁ b₂, h a (b₁ + b₂) = h a b₁ * h a b₂) :
(f + g).prod h = f.prod h * g.prod h :=
begin
rw [finsupp.prod_of_support_subset f (subset_union_left _ g.support) h h_zero,
finsupp.prod_of_support_subset g (subset_union_right f.support _) h h_zero,
←finset.prod_mul_distrib,
finsupp.prod_of_support_subset (f + g) finsupp.support_add h h_zero],
exact finset.prod_congr rfl (λ x hx, (by apply h_add x hx)),
end
/-- Taking the product under `h` is an additive-to-multiplicative homomorphism of finsupps,
if `h` is an additive-to-multiplicative homomorphism.
This is a more specialized version of `finsupp.prod_add_index` with simpler hypotheses. -/
@[to_additive "Taking the sum under `h` is an additive homomorphism of finsupps,
if `h` is an additive homomorphism.
This is a more specific version of `finsupp.sum_add_index` with simpler hypotheses."]
lemma prod_add_index' [add_zero_class M] [comm_monoid N] {f g : α →₀ M}
{h : α → M → N} (h_zero : ∀a, h a 0 = 1) (h_add : ∀a b₁ b₂, h a (b₁ + b₂) = h a b₁ * h a b₂) :
(f + g).prod h = f.prod h * g.prod h :=
by classical; exact prod_add_index (λ a ha, h_zero a) (λ a ha, h_add a)
@[simp]
lemma sum_hom_add_index [add_zero_class M] [add_comm_monoid N] {f g : α →₀ M} (h : α → M →+ N) :
(f + g).sum (λ x, h x) = f.sum (λ x, h x) + g.sum (λ x, h x) :=
sum_add_index' (λ a, (h a).map_zero) (λ a, (h a).map_add)
@[simp]
lemma prod_hom_add_index [add_zero_class M] [comm_monoid N] {f g : α →₀ M}
(h : α → multiplicative M →* N) :
(f + g).prod (λ a b, h a (multiplicative.of_add b)) =
f.prod (λ a b, h a (multiplicative.of_add b)) * g.prod (λ a b, h a (multiplicative.of_add b)) :=
prod_add_index' (λ a, (h a).map_one) (λ a, (h a).map_mul)
/-- The canonical isomorphism between families of additive monoid homomorphisms `α → (M →+ N)`
and monoid homomorphisms `(α →₀ M) →+ N`. -/
def lift_add_hom [add_zero_class M] [add_comm_monoid N] : (α → M →+ N) ≃+ ((α →₀ M) →+ N) :=
{ to_fun := λ F,
{ to_fun := λ f, f.sum (λ x, F x),
map_zero' := finset.sum_empty,
map_add' := λ _ _, sum_add_index' (λ x, (F x).map_zero) (λ x, (F x).map_add) },
inv_fun := λ F x, F.comp $ single_add_hom x,
left_inv := λ F, by { ext, simp },
right_inv := λ F, by { ext, simp },
map_add' := λ F G, by { ext, simp } }
@[simp] lemma lift_add_hom_apply [add_comm_monoid M] [add_comm_monoid N]
(F : α → M →+ N) (f : α →₀ M) :
lift_add_hom F f = f.sum (λ x, F x) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma lift_add_hom_symm_apply [add_comm_monoid M] [add_comm_monoid N]
(F : (α →₀ M) →+ N) (x : α) :
lift_add_hom.symm F x = F.comp (single_add_hom x) :=
rfl
lemma lift_add_hom_symm_apply_apply [add_comm_monoid M] [add_comm_monoid N]
(F : (α →₀ M) →+ N) (x : α) (y : M) :
lift_add_hom.symm F x y = F (single x y) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma lift_add_hom_single_add_hom [add_comm_monoid M] :
lift_add_hom (single_add_hom : α → M →+ α →₀ M) = add_monoid_hom.id _ :=
lift_add_hom.to_equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply.2 rfl
@[simp] lemma sum_single [add_comm_monoid M] (f : α →₀ M) :
f.sum single = f :=
add_monoid_hom.congr_fun lift_add_hom_single_add_hom f
@[simp] lemma sum_univ_single [add_comm_monoid M] [fintype α] (i : α) (m : M) :
∑ (j : α), (single i m) j = m :=
by simp [single]
@[simp] lemma sum_univ_single' [add_comm_monoid M] [fintype α] (i : α) (m : M) :
∑ (j : α), (single j m) i = m :=
by simp [single]
@[simp] lemma lift_add_hom_apply_single [add_comm_monoid M] [add_comm_monoid N]
(f : α → M →+ N) (a : α) (b : M) :
lift_add_hom f (single a b) = f a b :=
sum_single_index (f a).map_zero
@[simp] lemma lift_add_hom_comp_single [add_comm_monoid M] [add_comm_monoid N] (f : α → M →+ N)
(a : α) :
(lift_add_hom f).comp (single_add_hom a) = f a :=
add_monoid_hom.ext $ λ b, lift_add_hom_apply_single f a b
lemma comp_lift_add_hom [add_comm_monoid M] [add_comm_monoid N] [add_comm_monoid P]
(g : N →+ P) (f : α → M →+ N) :
g.comp (lift_add_hom f) = lift_add_hom (λ a, g.comp (f a)) :=
lift_add_hom.symm_apply_eq.1 $ funext $ λ a,
by rw [lift_add_hom_symm_apply, add_monoid_hom.comp_assoc, lift_add_hom_comp_single]
lemma sum_sub_index [add_comm_group β] [add_comm_group γ] {f g : α →₀ β}
{h : α → β → γ} (h_sub : ∀a b₁ b₂, h a (b₁ - b₂) = h a b₁ - h a b₂) :
(f - g).sum h = f.sum h - g.sum h :=
(lift_add_hom (λ a, add_monoid_hom.of_map_sub (h a) (h_sub a))).map_sub f g
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_emb_domain [has_zero M] [comm_monoid N] {v : α →₀ M} {f : α ↪ β} {g : β → M → N} :
(v.emb_domain f).prod g = v.prod (λ a b, g (f a) b) :=
begin
rw [prod, prod, support_emb_domain, finset.prod_map],
simp_rw emb_domain_apply,
end
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_finset_sum_index [add_comm_monoid M] [comm_monoid N]
{s : finset ι} {g : ι → α →₀ M}
{h : α → M → N} (h_zero : ∀a, h a 0 = 1) (h_add : ∀a b₁ b₂, h a (b₁ + b₂) = h a b₁ * h a b₂) :
∏ i in s, (g i).prod h = (∑ i in s, g i).prod h :=
finset.cons_induction_on s rfl $ λ a s has ih,
by rw [prod_cons, ih, sum_cons, prod_add_index' h_zero h_add]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_sum_index
[add_comm_monoid M] [add_comm_monoid N] [comm_monoid P]
{f : α →₀ M} {g : α → M → β →₀ N}
{h : β → N → P} (h_zero : ∀a, h a 0 = 1) (h_add : ∀a b₁ b₂, h a (b₁ + b₂) = h a b₁ * h a b₂) :
(f.sum g).prod h = f.prod (λa b, (g a b).prod h) :=
(prod_finset_sum_index h_zero h_add).symm
lemma multiset_sum_sum_index
[add_comm_monoid M] [add_comm_monoid N]
(f : multiset (α →₀ M)) (h : α → M → N)
(h₀ : ∀a, h a 0 = 0) (h₁ : ∀ (a : α) (b₁ b₂ : M), h a (b₁ + b₂) = h a b₁ + h a b₂) :
(f.sum.sum h) = (f.map $ λg:α →₀ M, g.sum h).sum :=
multiset.induction_on f rfl $ assume a s ih,
by rw [multiset.sum_cons, multiset.map_cons, multiset.sum_cons, sum_add_index' h₀ h₁, ih]
lemma support_sum_eq_bUnion {α : Type*} {ι : Type*} {M : Type*} [decidable_eq α]
[add_comm_monoid M]
{g : ι → α →₀ M} (s : finset ι) (h : ∀ i₁ i₂, i₁ ≠ i₂ → disjoint (g i₁).support (g i₂).support) :
(∑ i in s, g i).support = s.bUnion (λ i, (g i).support) :=
begin
classical,
apply finset.induction_on s,
{ simp },
{ intros i s hi,
simp only [hi, sum_insert, not_false_iff, bUnion_insert],
intro hs,
rw [finsupp.support_add_eq, hs],
rw [hs, finset.disjoint_bUnion_right],
intros j hj,
refine h _ _ (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hj hi).symm }
end
lemma multiset_map_sum [has_zero M] {f : α →₀ M} {m : β → γ} {h : α → M → multiset β} :
multiset.map m (f.sum h) = f.sum (λa b, (h a b).map m) :=
(multiset.map_add_monoid_hom m).map_sum _ f.support
lemma multiset_sum_sum [has_zero M] [add_comm_monoid N] {f : α →₀ M} {h : α → M → multiset N} :
multiset.sum (f.sum h) = f.sum (λa b, multiset.sum (h a b)) :=
(multiset.sum_add_monoid_hom : multiset N →+ N).map_sum _ f.support
/-- For disjoint `f1` and `f2`, and function `g`, the product of the products of `g`
over `f1` and `f2` equals the product of `g` over `f1 + f2` -/
@[to_additive "For disjoint `f1` and `f2`, and function `g`, the sum of the sums of `g`
over `f1` and `f2` equals the sum of `g` over `f1 + f2`"]
lemma prod_add_index_of_disjoint [add_comm_monoid M] {f1 f2 : α →₀ M}
(hd : disjoint f1.support f2.support) {β : Type*} [comm_monoid β] (g : α → M → β) :
(f1 + f2).prod g = f1.prod g * f2.prod g :=
have ∀ {f1 f2 : α →₀ M}, disjoint f1.support f2.support →
∏ x in f1.support, g x (f1 x + f2 x) = f1.prod g :=
λ f1 f2 hd, finset.prod_congr rfl (λ x hx,
by simp only [not_mem_support_iff.mp (disjoint_left.mp hd hx), add_zero]),
begin
classical,
simp_rw [← this hd, ← this hd.symm,
add_comm (f2 _), finsupp.prod, support_add_eq hd, prod_union hd, add_apply]
end
lemma prod_dvd_prod_of_subset_of_dvd [add_comm_monoid M] [comm_monoid N]
{f1 f2 : α →₀ M} {g1 g2 : α → M → N} (h1 : f1.support ⊆ f2.support)
(h2 : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ f1.support → g1 a (f1 a) ∣ g2 a (f2 a)) :
f1.prod g1 ∣ f2.prod g2 :=
begin
classical,
simp only [finsupp.prod, finsupp.prod_mul],
rw [←sdiff_union_of_subset h1, prod_union sdiff_disjoint],
apply dvd_mul_of_dvd_right,
apply prod_dvd_prod_of_dvd,
exact h2,
end
lemma indicator_eq_sum_single [add_comm_monoid M] (s : finset α) (f : Π a ∈ s, M) :
indicator s f = ∑ x in s.attach, single x (f x x.2) :=
begin
rw [← sum_single (indicator s f), sum, sum_subset (support_indicator_subset _ _), ← sum_attach],
{ refine finset.sum_congr rfl (λ x hx, _),
rw [indicator_of_mem], },
intros i _ hi,
rw [not_mem_support_iff.mp hi, single_zero],
end
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma prod_indicator_index [has_zero M] [comm_monoid N]
{s : finset α} (f : Π a ∈ s, M) {h : α → M → N} (h_zero : ∀ a ∈ s, h a 0 = 1) :
(indicator s f).prod h = ∏ x in s.attach, h x (f x x.2) :=
begin
rw [prod_of_support_subset _ (support_indicator_subset _ _) h h_zero, ← prod_attach],
refine finset.prod_congr rfl (λ x hx, _),
rw [indicator_of_mem],
end
end finsupp
theorem finset.sum_apply' : (∑ k in s, f k) i = ∑ k in s, f k i :=
(finsupp.apply_add_hom i : (ι →₀ A) →+ A).map_sum f s
theorem finsupp.sum_apply' : g.sum k x = g.sum (λ i b, k i b x) :=
finset.sum_apply _ _ _
section
include h0 h1
open_locale classical
theorem finsupp.sum_sum_index' : (∑ x in s, f x).sum t = ∑ x in s, (f x).sum t :=
finset.induction_on s rfl $ λ a s has ih,
by simp_rw [finset.sum_insert has, finsupp.sum_add_index' h0 h1, ih]
end
section
variables [non_unital_non_assoc_semiring R] [non_unital_non_assoc_semiring S]
lemma finsupp.sum_mul (b : S) (s : α →₀ R) {f : α → R → S} :
(s.sum f) * b = s.sum (λ a c, (f a c) * b) :=
by simp only [finsupp.sum, finset.sum_mul]
lemma finsupp.mul_sum (b : S) (s : α →₀ R) {f : α → R → S} :
b * (s.sum f) = s.sum (λ a c, b * (f a c)) :=
by simp only [finsupp.sum, finset.mul_sum]
end
namespace nat
/-- If `0 : ℕ` is not in the support of `f : ℕ →₀ ℕ` then `0 < ∏ x in f.support, x ^ (f x)`. -/
lemma prod_pow_pos_of_zero_not_mem_support {f : ℕ →₀ ℕ} (hf : 0 ∉ f.support) : 0 < f.prod pow :=
finset.prod_pos (λ a ha, pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr (pow_ne_zero _ (λ H, by {subst H, exact hf ha})))
end nat
|
736aa1dc4a3318e506bd2f8474feb69c2ed5dadb | 2c096fdfecf64e46ea7bc6ce5521f142b5926864 | /src/Lean/Compiler/LCNF/Specialize.lean | 5145651fb3632e171a8f1807b88c292d4828f3dd | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | Kha/lean4 | 1005785d2c8797ae266a303968848e5f6ce2fe87 | b99e11346948023cd6c29d248cd8f3e3fb3474cf | refs/heads/master | 1,693,355,498,027 | 1,669,080,461,000 | 1,669,113,138,000 | 184,748,176 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,665,995,520,000 | 1,556,884,930,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,427 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Compiler.Specialize
import Lean.Compiler.LCNF.Simp
import Lean.Compiler.LCNF.SpecInfo
import Lean.Compiler.LCNF.PrettyPrinter
import Lean.Compiler.LCNF.ToExpr
import Lean.Compiler.LCNF.Level
import Lean.Compiler.LCNF.PhaseExt
import Lean.Compiler.LCNF.MonadScope
import Lean.Compiler.LCNF.Closure
import Lean.Compiler.LCNF.FVarUtil
namespace Lean.Compiler.LCNF
namespace Specialize
abbrev Cache := SMap Expr Name
structure CacheEntry where
key : Expr
declName : Name
deriving Inhabited
def addEntry (cache : Cache) (e : CacheEntry) : Cache :=
cache.insert e.key e.declName
builtin_initialize specCacheExt : SimplePersistentEnvExtension CacheEntry Cache ←
registerSimplePersistentEnvExtension {
addEntryFn := addEntry
addImportedFn := fun es => (mkStateFromImportedEntries addEntry {} es).switch
}
def cacheSpec (key : Expr) (declName : Name) : CoreM Unit :=
modifyEnv fun env => specCacheExt.addEntry env { key, declName }
def findSpecCache? (key : Expr) : CoreM (Option Name) :=
return specCacheExt.getState (← getEnv) |>.find? key
structure Context where
/--
Set of free variables in scope. The "collector" uses this information when collecting
dependencies for code specialization.
-/
scope : FVarIdSet := {}
/--
Set of let-declarations in scope that do not depend on parameters.
-/
ground : FVarIdSet := {}
/--
Name of the declaration being processed
-/
declName : Name
structure State where
decls : Array Decl := #[]
abbrev SpecializeM := ReaderT Context $ StateRefT State CompilerM
instance : MonadScope SpecializeM where
getScope := return (← read).scope
withScope f := withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with scope := f ctx.scope })
/--
Return `true` if `e` is a ground term. That is,
it contains only free variables tagged as ground
-/
def isGround [TraverseFVar α] (e : α) : SpecializeM Bool := do
let s := (← read).ground
return allFVar (s.contains ·) e
@[inline] def withLetDecl (decl : LetDecl) (x : SpecializeM α) : SpecializeM α := do
let grd ← isGround decl.value
let fvarId := decl.fvarId
withReader (fun { scope, ground, declName } => { declName, scope := scope.insert fvarId, ground := if grd then ground.insert fvarId else ground }) x
namespace Collector
/-!
# Dependency collector for the code specialization function.
During code specialization, we select which arguments are going to be used during the specialization.
Then, we have to collect their dependencies. For example, suppose are trying to specialize the following `IO.println`
and `List.forM` applications in the following example:
```
def f xs a.1 :=
let _x.2 := @instMonadEIO IO.Error
let _x.5 := instToStringString
let _x.9 := instToStringNat
let _x.6 := "hello"
let _x.61 := @IO.println String _x.5 _x.6 a.1 -- (*)
cases _x.61
| EStateM.Result.ok a.6 a.7 =>
fun _f.72 _y.69 _y.70 :=
let _x.71 := @IO.println Nat _x.9 _y.69 _y.70 -- (*)
_x.71
let _x.65 := @List.forM (fun α => PUnit → EStateM.Result IO.Error PUnit α) _x.2 Nat xs _f.72 a.7 -- (*)
...
...
```
For `IO.println` the `SpecArgInfo` is `[N, I, O, O]`, i.e., only the first two arguments are considered
for code specialization. The first one is computationally neutral, and the second one is an instance.
For `List.forM`, we have `[N, I, N, O, H]`. In this case, the fifth argument (tagged as `H`) is a function.
Note that the actual `List.forM` application has 6 arguments, the extra argument comes from the `IO` monad.
For the first `IO.println` application, the collector collects `_x.5`.
For the `List.forM`, it collects `_x.2`, `_x.9`, and `_f.72`.
The collected values are used to construct a key to identify the specialization. Arguments that were not considered are
replaced with `lcErased`. The key is used to make sure we don't keep generating the same specialization over and over again.
This is not an optimization, it is essential to prevent the code specializer from looping while specializing recursive functions.
The keys for these two applications are the terms.
```
@IO.println Nat instToStringNat lcErased lcErased
```
and
```
@List.forM
(fun α => PUnit → EStateM.Result IO.Error PUnit α)
(@instMonadEIO IO.Error) Nat lcErased
(fun _y.69 _y.70 =>
let _x.71 := @IO.println Nat instToStringNat _y.69 _y.70;
_x.71)
```
The keys never contain free variables or loose bound variables.
-/
/--
Given the specialization mask `paramsInfo` and the arguments `args`,
collect their dependencies, and return an array `mask` of size `paramsInfo.size` s.t.
- `mask[i] = some args[i]` if `paramsInfo[i] != .other`
- `mask[i] = none`, otherwise.
That is, `mask` contains only the arguments that are contributing to the code specialization.
We use this information to compute a "key" to uniquely identify the code specialization, and
creating the specialized code.
-/
def collect (paramsInfo : Array SpecParamInfo) (args : Array Arg) : SpecializeM (Array (Option Arg) × Array Param × Array CodeDecl) := do
let ctx ← read
let lctx := (← getThe CompilerM.State).lctx
let abstract (fvarId : FVarId) : Bool :=
-- We convert let-declarations that are not ground into parameters
!lctx.funDecls.contains fvarId && !ctx.ground.contains fvarId
Closure.run (inScope := ctx.scope.contains) (abstract := abstract) do
let mut argMask := #[]
for paramInfo in paramsInfo, arg in args do
match paramInfo with
| .other =>
argMask := argMask.push none
| .fixedNeutral | .user | .fixedInst | .fixedHO =>
argMask := argMask.push (some arg)
Closure.collectArg arg
return argMask
end Collector
/--
Return `true` if it is worth using arguments `args` for specialization given the parameter specialization information.
-/
def shouldSpecialize (paramsInfo : Array SpecParamInfo) (args : Array Arg) : SpecializeM Bool := do
for paramInfo in paramsInfo, arg in args do
match paramInfo with
| .other => pure ()
| .fixedNeutral => pure () -- If we want to monomorphize types such as `Array`, we need to change here
| .fixedInst | .user => if (← isGround arg) then return true
| .fixedHO => return true -- TODO: check whether this is too aggressive
return false
/--
Convert the given declarations into `Expr`, and "zeta-reduce" them into body.
This function is used to compute the key that uniquely identifies an code specialization.
-/
def expandCodeDecls (decls : Array CodeDecl) (body : LetValue) : CompilerM Expr := do
let xs := decls.map (mkFVar ·.fvarId)
let values := decls.map fun
| .let decl => decl.value.toExpr
| .fun decl | .jp decl => decl.toExpr
let rec go (i : Nat) (subst : Array Expr) : Expr :=
if h : i < values.size then
let value := values[i].abstractRange i xs
let value := value.instantiateRev subst
go (i+1) (subst.push value)
else
(body.toExpr.abstract xs).instantiateRev subst
return go 0 #[]
termination_by go => values.size - i
/--
Create the "key" that uniquely identifies a code specialization.
`params` and `decls` are the declarations collected by the `collect` function above.
The result contains the list of universe level parameter names the key that `params`, `decls`, and `body` depends on.
We use this information to create the new auxiliary declaration and resulting application.
-/
def mkKey (params : Array Param) (decls : Array CodeDecl) (body : LetValue) : CompilerM (Expr × List Name) := do
let body ← expandCodeDecls decls body
let key := ToExpr.run do
ToExpr.withParams params do
ToExpr.mkLambdaM params (← ToExpr.abstractM body)
return normLevelParams key
open Internalize in
/--
Specialize `decl` using
- `us`: the universe level used to instantiate `decl.name`
- `argMask`: arguments that are being used to specialize the declaration.
- `params`: new parameters that arguments in `argMask` depend on.
- `decls`: local declarations that arguments in `argMask` depend on.
- `levelParamsNew`: the universe level parameters for the new declaration.
-/
def mkSpecDecl (decl : Decl) (us : List Level) (argMask : Array (Option Arg)) (params : Array Param) (decls : Array CodeDecl) (levelParamsNew : List Name) : SpecializeM Decl := do
let nameNew := decl.name ++ `_at_ ++ (← read).declName ++ (`spec).appendIndexAfter (← get).decls.size
/-
Recall that we have just retrieved `decl` using `getDecl?`, and it may have free variable identifiers that overlap with the free-variables
in `params` and `decls` (i.e., the "closure").
Recall that `params` and `decls` are internalized, but `decl` is not.
Thus, we internalize `decl` before glueing these "pieces" together. We erase the internalized information after we are done.
-/
let decl ← decl.internalize
try
go decl nameNew |>.run' {}
finally
eraseDecl decl
where
go (decl : Decl) (nameNew : Name) : InternalizeM Decl := do
let mut params ← params.mapM internalizeParam
let decls ← decls.mapM internalizeCodeDecl
for param in decl.params, arg in argMask do
if let some arg := arg then
let arg ← normArg arg
modify fun s => s.insert param.fvarId arg.toExpr
else
-- Keep the parameter
let param := { param with type := param.type.instantiateLevelParamsNoCache decl.levelParams us }
params := params.push (← internalizeParam param)
for param in decl.params[argMask.size:] do
let param := { param with type := param.type.instantiateLevelParamsNoCache decl.levelParams us }
params := params.push (← internalizeParam param)
let value := decl.instantiateValueLevelParams us
let value ← internalizeCode value
let value := attachCodeDecls decls value
let type ← value.inferType
let type ← mkForallParams params type
let safe := decl.safe
let recursive := decl.recursive
let decl := { name := nameNew, levelParams := levelParamsNew, params, type, value, safe, recursive, inlineAttr? := none : Decl }
return decl.setLevelParams
/--
Given the specialization mask `paramsInfo` and the arguments `args`,
return the arguments that have not been considered for specialization.
-/
def getRemainingArgs (paramsInfo : Array SpecParamInfo) (args : Array Arg) : Array Arg := Id.run do
let mut result := #[]
for info in paramsInfo, arg in args do
if info matches .other then
result := result.push arg
return result ++ args[paramsInfo.size:]
mutual
/--
Try to specialize the function application in the given let-declaration.
`k` is the continuation for the let-declaration.
-/
partial def specializeApp? (e : LetValue) : SpecializeM (Option LetValue) := do
let .const declName us args := e | return none
if args.isEmpty then return none
if (← Meta.isInstance declName) then return none
let some paramsInfo ← getSpecParamInfo? declName | return none
unless (← shouldSpecialize paramsInfo args) do return none
let some decl ← getDecl? declName | return none
trace[Compiler.specialize.candidate] "{e.toExpr}, {paramsInfo}"
let (argMask, params, decls) ← Collector.collect paramsInfo args
let keyBody := .const declName us (argMask.filterMap id)
let (key, levelParamsNew) ← mkKey params decls keyBody
trace[Compiler.specialize.candidate] "key: {key}"
assert! !key.hasLooseBVars
assert! !key.hasFVar
let usNew := levelParamsNew.map mkLevelParam
let argsNew := params.map (.fvar ·.fvarId) ++ getRemainingArgs paramsInfo args
if let some declName ← findSpecCache? key then
trace[Compiler.specialize.step] "cached: {declName}"
return some (.const declName usNew argsNew)
else
let specDecl ← mkSpecDecl decl us argMask params decls levelParamsNew
trace[Compiler.specialize.step] "new: {specDecl.name}"
cacheSpec key specDecl.name
specDecl.saveBase
let specDecl ← specDecl.etaExpand
specDecl.saveBase
let specDecl ← specDecl.simp {}
let specDecl ← specDecl.simp { etaPoly := true, inlinePartial := true, implementedBy := true }
let value ← withReader (fun _ => { declName := specDecl.name }) do
withParams specDecl.params <| visitCode specDecl.value
let specDecl := { specDecl with value }
modify fun s => { s with decls := s.decls.push specDecl }
return some (.const specDecl.name usNew argsNew)
partial def visitFunDecl (funDecl : FunDecl) : SpecializeM FunDecl := do
let value ← withParams funDecl.params <| visitCode funDecl.value
funDecl.update' funDecl.type value
partial def visitCode (code : Code) : SpecializeM Code := do
match code with
| .let decl k =>
let mut decl := decl
if let some value ← specializeApp? decl.value then
decl ← decl.updateValue value
let k ← withLetDecl decl <| visitCode k
return code.updateLet! decl k
| .fun decl k | .jp decl k =>
let decl ← visitFunDecl decl
let k ← withFVar decl.fvarId <| visitCode k
return code.updateFun! decl k
| .cases c =>
let alts ← c.alts.mapMonoM fun alt =>
match alt with
| .default k => return alt.updateCode (← visitCode k)
| .alt _ ps k => withParams ps do return alt.updateCode (← visitCode k)
return code.updateAlts! alts
| .unreach .. | .jmp .. | .return .. => return code
end
def main (decl : Decl) : SpecializeM Decl := do
if (← decl.isTemplateLike) then
return decl
else
let value ← withParams decl.params <| visitCode decl.value
return { decl with value }
end Specialize
partial def Decl.specialize (decl : Decl) : CompilerM (Array Decl) := do
let (decl, s) ← Specialize.main decl |>.run { declName := decl.name } |>.run {}
return s.decls.push decl
def specialize : Pass where
phase := .base
name := `specialize
run := fun decls => do
saveSpecParamInfo decls
decls.foldlM (init := #[]) fun decls decl => return decls ++ (← decl.specialize)
builtin_initialize
registerTraceClass `Compiler.specialize (inherited := true)
registerTraceClass `Compiler.specialize.candidate
registerTraceClass `Compiler.specialize.step
end Lean.Compiler.LCNF
|
7fb8076e09a9f3f0ee32db43938713360d0dc97d | 77c5b91fae1b966ddd1db969ba37b6f0e4901e88 | /src/tactic/core.lean | 9fac519ec0fe65e770f0bd5f3bc6dfb1cee13a50 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | dexmagic/mathlib | ff48eefc56e2412429b31d4fddd41a976eb287ce | 7a5d15a955a92a90e1d398b2281916b9c41270b2 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,481,322,046 | 1,633,360,193,000 | 1,633,360,193,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 94,617 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Simon Hudon, Scott Morrison, Keeley Hoek
-/
import data.dlist.basic
import logic.function.basic
import control.basic
import meta.expr
import meta.rb_map
import data.bool
import tactic.binder_matching
import tactic.lean_core_docs
import tactic.interactive_expr
import system.io
universe variable u
attribute [derive [has_reflect, decidable_eq]] tactic.transparency
instance : has_lt pos :=
{ lt := λ x y, (x.line, x.column) < (y.line, y.column) }
namespace expr
open tactic
/-- Given an expr `α` representing a type with numeral structure,
`of_nat α n` creates the `α`-valued numeral expression corresponding to `n`. -/
protected meta def of_nat (α : expr) : ℕ → tactic expr :=
nat.binary_rec
(tactic.mk_mapp ``has_zero.zero [some α, none])
(λ b n tac, if n = 0 then mk_mapp ``has_one.one [some α, none] else
do e ← tac, tactic.mk_app (cond b ``bit1 ``bit0) [e])
/-- Given an expr `α` representing a type with numeral structure,
`of_int α n` creates the `α`-valued numeral expression corresponding to `n`.
The output is either a numeral or the negation of a numeral. -/
protected meta def of_int (α : expr) : ℤ → tactic expr
| (n : ℕ) := expr.of_nat α n
| -[1+ n] := do
e ← expr.of_nat α (n+1),
tactic.mk_app ``has_neg.neg [e]
/-- Generates an expression of the form `∃(args), inner`. `args` is assumed to be a list of local
constants. When possible, `p ∧ q` is used instead of `∃(_ : p), q`. -/
meta def mk_exists_lst (args : list expr) (inner : expr) : tactic expr :=
args.mfoldr (λarg i:expr, do
t ← infer_type arg,
sort l ← infer_type t,
return $ if arg.occurs i ∨ l ≠ level.zero
then (const `Exists [l] : expr) t (i.lambdas [arg])
else (const `and [] : expr) t i)
inner
/-- `traverse f e` applies the monadic function `f` to the direct descendants of `e`. -/
meta def traverse {m : Type → Type u} [applicative m]
{elab elab' : bool} (f : expr elab → m (expr elab')) :
expr elab → m (expr elab')
| (var v) := pure $ var v
| (sort l) := pure $ sort l
| (const n ls) := pure $ const n ls
| (mvar n n' e) := mvar n n' <$> f e
| (local_const n n' bi e) := local_const n n' bi <$> f e
| (app e₀ e₁) := app <$> f e₀ <*> f e₁
| (lam n bi e₀ e₁) := lam n bi <$> f e₀ <*> f e₁
| (pi n bi e₀ e₁) := pi n bi <$> f e₀ <*> f e₁
| (elet n e₀ e₁ e₂) := elet n <$> f e₀ <*> f e₁ <*> f e₂
| (macro mac es) := macro mac <$> list.traverse f es
/-- `mfoldl f a e` folds the monadic function `f` over the subterms of the expression `e`,
with initial value `a`. -/
meta def mfoldl {α : Type} {m} [monad m] (f : α → expr → m α) : α → expr → m α
| x e := prod.snd <$> (state_t.run (e.traverse $ λ e',
(get >>= monad_lift ∘ flip f e' >>= put) $> e') x : m _)
/-- `kreplace e old new` replaces all occurrences of the expression `old` in `e`
with `new`. The occurrences of `old` in `e` are determined using keyed matching
with transparency `md`; see `kabstract` for details. If `unify` is true,
we may assign metavariables in `e` as we match subterms of `e` against `old`. -/
meta def kreplace (e old new : expr) (md := semireducible) (unify := tt)
: tactic expr := do
e ← kabstract e old md unify,
pure $ e.instantiate_var new
end expr
namespace interaction_monad
open result
variables {σ : Type} {α : Type u}
/-- `get_state` returns the underlying state inside an interaction monad, from within that monad. -/
-- Note that this is a generalization of `tactic.read` in core.
meta def get_state : interaction_monad σ σ :=
λ state, success state state
/-- `set_state` sets the underlying state inside an interaction monad, from within that monad. -/
-- Note that this is a generalization of `tactic.write` in core.
meta def set_state (state : σ) : interaction_monad σ unit :=
λ _, success () state
/--
`run_with_state state tac` applies `tac` to the given state `state` and returns the result,
subsequently restoring the original state.
If `tac` fails, then `run_with_state` does too.
-/
meta def run_with_state (state : σ) (tac : interaction_monad σ α) : interaction_monad σ α :=
λ s, match tac state with
| success val _ := success val s
| exception fn pos _ := exception fn pos s
end
end interaction_monad
namespace format
/-- `join' [a,b,c]` produces the format object `abc`.
It differs from `format.join` by using `format.nil` instead of `""` for the empty list. -/
meta def join' (xs : list format) : format :=
xs.foldl compose nil
/-- `intercalate x [a, b, c]` produces the format object `a.x.b.x.c`,
where `.` represents `format.join`. -/
meta def intercalate (x : format) : list format → format :=
join' ∘ list.intersperse x
/-- `soft_break` is similar to `line`. Whereas in `group (x ++ line ++ y ++ line ++ z)`
the result either fits on one line or in three, `x ++ soft_break ++ y ++ soft_break ++ z`
each line break is decided independently -/
meta def soft_break : format :=
group line
/-- Format a list as a comma separated list, without any brackets. -/
meta def comma_separated {α : Type*} [has_to_format α] : list α → format
| [] := nil
| xs := group (nest 1 $ intercalate ("," ++ soft_break) $ xs.map to_fmt)
end format
section format
open format
/-- format a `list` by separating elements with `soft_break` instead of `line` -/
meta def list.to_line_wrap_format {α : Type u} [has_to_format α] (l : list α) : format :=
bracket "[" "]" (comma_separated l)
end format
namespace tactic
open function
export interaction_monad (get_state set_state run_with_state)
/-- Private work function for `add_local_consts_as_local_hyps`: given
`mappings : list (expr × expr)` corresponding to pairs `(var, hyp)` of variables and the local
hypothesis created as a result and `(var :: rest) : list expr` of more local variables we
examine `var` to see if it contains any other variables in `rest`. If it does, we put it to the
back of the queue and recurse. If it does not, then we perform replacements inside the type of
`var` using the `mappings`, create a new associate local hypothesis, add this to the list of
mappings, and recurse. We are done once all local hypotheses have been processed.
If the list of passed local constants have types which depend on one another (which can only
happen by hand-crafting the `expr`s manually), this function will loop forever. -/
private meta def add_local_consts_as_local_hyps_aux
: list (expr × expr) → list expr → tactic (list (expr × expr))
| mappings [] := return mappings
| mappings (var :: rest) := do
/- Determine if `var` contains any local variables in the lift `rest`. -/
let is_dependent := var.local_type.fold ff $ λ e n b,
if b then b else e ∈ rest,
/- If so, then skip it---add it to the end of the variable queue. -/
if is_dependent then
add_local_consts_as_local_hyps_aux mappings (rest ++ [var])
else do
/- Otherwise, replace all of the local constants referenced by the type of `var` with the
respective new corresponding local hypotheses as recorded in the list `mappings`. -/
let new_type := var.local_type.replace_subexprs mappings,
/- Introduce a new local new local hypothesis `hyp` for `var`, with the correct type. -/
hyp ← assertv var.local_pp_name new_type (var.local_const_set_type new_type),
/- Process the next variable in the queue, with the mapping list updated to include the local
hypothesis which we just created. -/
add_local_consts_as_local_hyps_aux ((var, hyp) :: mappings) rest
/-- `add_local_consts_as_local_hyps vars` add the given list `vars` of `expr.local_const`s to the
tactic state. This is harder than it sounds, since the list of local constants which we have
been passed can have dependencies between their types.
For example, suppose we have two local constants `n : ℕ` and `h : n = 3`. Then we cannot blindly
add `h` as a local hypothesis, since we need the `n` to which it refers to be the `n` created as
a new local hypothesis, not the old local constant `n` with the same name. Of course, these
dependencies can be nested arbitrarily deep.
If the list of passed local constants have types which depend on one another (which can only
happen by hand-crafting the `expr`s manually), this function will loop forever. -/
meta def add_local_consts_as_local_hyps (vars : list expr) : tactic (list (expr × expr)) :=
/- The `list.reverse` below is a performance optimisation since the list of available variables
reported by the system is often mostly the reverse of the order in which they are dependent. -/
add_local_consts_as_local_hyps_aux [] vars.reverse.erase_dup
private meta def get_expl_pi_arity_aux : expr → tactic nat
| (expr.pi n bi d b) :=
do m ← mk_fresh_name,
let l := expr.local_const m n bi d,
new_b ← whnf (expr.instantiate_var b l),
r ← get_expl_pi_arity_aux new_b,
if bi = binder_info.default then
return (r + 1)
else
return r
| e := return 0
/-- Compute the arity of explicit arguments of `type`. -/
meta def get_expl_pi_arity (type : expr) : tactic nat :=
whnf type >>= get_expl_pi_arity_aux
/-- Compute the arity of explicit arguments of `fn`'s type. -/
meta def get_expl_arity (fn : expr) : tactic nat :=
infer_type fn >>= get_expl_pi_arity
private meta def get_app_fn_args_whnf_aux (md : transparency)
(unfold_ginductive : bool) : list expr → expr → tactic (expr × list expr) :=
λ args e, do
e ← whnf e md unfold_ginductive,
match e with
| (expr.app t u) := get_app_fn_args_whnf_aux (u :: args) t
| _ := pure (e, args)
end
/--
For `e = f x₁ ... xₙ`, `get_app_fn_args_whnf e` returns `(f, [x₁, ..., xₙ])`. `e`
is normalised as necessary; for example:
```
get_app_fn_args_whnf `(let f := g x in f y) = (`(g), [`(x), `(y)])
```
The returned expression is in whnf, but the arguments are generally not.
-/
meta def get_app_fn_args_whnf (e : expr) (md := semireducible)
(unfold_ginductive := tt) : tactic (expr × list expr) :=
get_app_fn_args_whnf_aux md unfold_ginductive [] e
/--
`get_app_fn_whnf e md unfold_ginductive` is like `expr.get_app_fn e` but `e` is
normalised as necessary (with transparency `md`). `unfold_ginductive` controls
whether constructors of generalised inductive types are unfolded. The returned
expression is in whnf.
-/
meta def get_app_fn_whnf : expr → opt_param _ semireducible → opt_param _ tt → tactic expr
| e md unfold_ginductive := do
e ← whnf e md unfold_ginductive,
match e with
| (expr.app f _) := get_app_fn_whnf f md unfold_ginductive
| _ := pure e
end
/--
`get_app_fn_const_whnf e md unfold_ginductive` expects that `e = C x₁ ... xₙ`,
where `C` is a constant, after normalisation with transparency `md`. If so, the
name of `C` is returned. Otherwise the tactic fails. `unfold_ginductive`
controls whether constructors of generalised inductive types are unfolded.
-/
meta def get_app_fn_const_whnf (e : expr) (md := semireducible)
(unfold_ginductive := tt) : tactic name := do
f ← get_app_fn_whnf e md unfold_ginductive,
match f with
| (expr.const n _) := pure n
| _ := fail format!
"expected a constant (possibly applied to some arguments), but got:\n{e}"
end
/--
`get_app_args_whnf e md unfold_ginductive` is like `expr.get_app_args e` but `e`
is normalised as necessary (with transparency `md`). `unfold_ginductive`
controls whether constructors of generalised inductive types are unfolded. The
returned expressions are not necessarily in whnf.
-/
meta def get_app_args_whnf (e : expr) (md := semireducible)
(unfold_ginductive := tt) : tactic (list expr) :=
prod.snd <$> get_app_fn_args_whnf e md unfold_ginductive
/-- `pis loc_consts f` is used to create a pi expression whose body is `f`.
`loc_consts` should be a list of local constants. The function will abstract these local
constants from `f` and bind them with pi binders.
For example, if `a, b` are local constants with types `Ta, Tb`,
``pis [a, b] `(f a b)`` will return the expression
`Π (a : Ta) (b : Tb), f a b`. -/
meta def pis : list expr → expr → tactic expr
| (e@(expr.local_const uniq pp info _) :: es) f := do
t ← infer_type e,
f' ← pis es f,
pure $ expr.pi pp info t (expr.abstract_local f' uniq)
| _ f := pure f
/-- `lambdas loc_consts f` is used to create a lambda expression whose body is `f`.
`loc_consts` should be a list of local constants. The function will abstract these local
constants from `f` and bind them with lambda binders.
For example, if `a, b` are local constants with types `Ta, Tb`,
``lambdas [a, b] `(f a b)`` will return the expression
`λ (a : Ta) (b : Tb), f a b`. -/
meta def lambdas : list expr → expr → tactic expr
| (e@(expr.local_const uniq pp info _) :: es) f := do
t ← infer_type e,
f' ← lambdas es f,
pure $ expr.lam pp info t (expr.abstract_local f' uniq)
| _ f := pure f
-- TODO: move to `declaration` namespace in `meta/expr.lean`
/-- `mk_theorem n ls t e` creates a theorem declaration with name `n`, universe parameters named
`ls`, type `t`, and body `e`. -/
meta def mk_theorem (n : name) (ls : list name) (t : expr) (e : expr) : declaration :=
declaration.thm n ls t (task.pure e)
/-- `add_theorem_by n ls type tac` uses `tac` to synthesize a term with type `type`, and adds this
to the environment as a theorem with name `n` and universe parameters `ls`. -/
meta def add_theorem_by (n : name) (ls : list name) (type : expr) (tac : tactic unit) :
tactic expr :=
do ((), body) ← solve_aux type tac,
body ← instantiate_mvars body,
add_decl $ mk_theorem n ls type body,
return $ expr.const n $ ls.map level.param
/-- `eval_expr' α e` attempts to evaluate the expression `e` in the type `α`.
This is a variant of `eval_expr` in core. Due to unexplained behavior in the VM, in rare
situations the latter will fail but the former will succeed. -/
meta def eval_expr' (α : Type*) [_inst_1 : reflected α] (e : expr) : tactic α :=
mk_app ``id [e] >>= eval_expr α
/-- `mk_fresh_name` returns identifiers starting with underscores,
which are not legal when emitted by tactic programs. `mk_user_fresh_name`
turns the useful source of random names provided by `mk_fresh_name` into
names which are usable by tactic programs.
The returned name has four components which are all strings. -/
meta def mk_user_fresh_name : tactic name :=
do nm ← mk_fresh_name,
return $ `user__ ++ nm.pop_prefix.sanitize_name ++ `user__
/-- `has_attribute' attr_name decl_name` checks
whether `decl_name` exists and has attribute `attr_name`. -/
meta def has_attribute' (attr_name decl_name : name) : tactic bool :=
succeeds (has_attribute attr_name decl_name)
/-- Checks whether the name is a simp lemma -/
meta def is_simp_lemma : name → tactic bool :=
has_attribute' `simp
/-- Checks whether the name is an instance. -/
meta def is_instance : name → tactic bool :=
has_attribute' `instance
/-- `local_decls` returns a dictionary mapping names to their corresponding declarations.
Covers all declarations from the current file. -/
meta def local_decls : tactic (name_map declaration) :=
do e ← tactic.get_env,
let xs := e.fold native.mk_rb_map
(λ d s, if environment.in_current_file e d.to_name
then s.insert d.to_name d else s),
pure xs
/-- `get_decls_from` returns a dictionary mapping names to their
corresponding declarations. Covers all declarations the files listed
in `fs`, with the current file listed as `none`.
The path of the file names is expected to be relative to
the root of the project (i.e. the location of `leanpkg.toml` when it
is present); e.g. `"src/tactic/core.lean"`
Possible issue: `get_decls_from` uses `get_cwd`, the current working
directory, which may not always point at the root of the project.
It would work better if it searched for the root directory or,
better yet, if Lean exposed its path information.
-/
meta def get_decls_from (fs : list (option string)) : tactic (name_map declaration) :=
do root ← unsafe_run_io $ io.env.get_cwd,
let fs := fs.map (option.map $ λ path, root ++ "/" ++ path),
err ← unsafe_run_io $ (fs.filter_map id).mfilter $ (<$>) bnot ∘ io.fs.file_exists,
guard (err = []) <|> fail format!"File not found: {err}",
e ← tactic.get_env,
let xs := e.fold native.mk_rb_map
(λ d s,
let source := e.decl_olean d.to_name in
if source ∈ fs ∧ (source = none → e.in_current_file d.to_name)
then s.insert d.to_name d else s),
pure xs
/-- If `{nm}_{n}` doesn't exist in the environment, returns that, otherwise tries `{nm}_{n+1}` -/
meta def get_unused_decl_name_aux (e : environment) (nm : name) : ℕ → tactic name | n :=
let nm' := nm.append_suffix ("_" ++ to_string n) in
if e.contains nm' then get_unused_decl_name_aux (n+1) else return nm'
/-- Return a name which doesn't already exist in the environment. If `nm` doesn't exist, it
returns that, otherwise it tries `nm_2`, `nm_3`, ... -/
meta def get_unused_decl_name (nm : name) : tactic name :=
get_env >>= λ e, if e.contains nm then get_unused_decl_name_aux e nm 2 else return nm
/--
Returns a pair `(e, t)`, where `e ← mk_const d.to_name`, and `t = d.type`
but with universe params updated to match the fresh universe metavariables in `e`.
This should have the same effect as just
```lean
do e ← mk_const d.to_name,
t ← infer_type e,
return (e, t)
```
but is hopefully faster.
-/
meta def decl_mk_const (d : declaration) : tactic (expr × expr) :=
do subst ← d.univ_params.mmap $ λ u, prod.mk u <$> mk_meta_univ,
let e : expr := expr.const d.to_name (prod.snd <$> subst),
return (e, d.type.instantiate_univ_params subst)
/--
Replace every universe metavariable in an expression with a universe parameter.
(This is useful when making new declarations.)
-/
meta def replace_univ_metas_with_univ_params (e : expr) : tactic expr :=
do
e.list_univ_meta_vars.enum.mmap (λ n, do
let n' := (`u).append_suffix ("_" ++ to_string (n.1+1)),
unify (expr.sort (level.mvar n.2)) (expr.sort (level.param n'))),
instantiate_mvars e
/-- `mk_local n` creates a dummy local variable with name `n`.
The type of this local constant is a constant with name `n`, so it is very unlikely to be
a meaningful expression. -/
meta def mk_local (n : name) : expr :=
expr.local_const n n binder_info.default (expr.const n [])
/-- `mk_psigma [x,y,z]`, with `[x,y,z]` list of local constants of types `x : tx`,
`y : ty x` and `z : tz x y`, creates an expression of sigma type:
`⟨x,y,z⟩ : Σ' (x : tx) (y : ty x), tz x y`.
-/
meta def mk_psigma : list expr → tactic expr
| [] := mk_const ``punit
| [x@(expr.local_const _ _ _ _)] := pure x
| (x@(expr.local_const _ _ _ _) :: xs) :=
do y ← mk_psigma xs,
α ← infer_type x,
β ← infer_type y,
t ← lambdas [x] β >>= instantiate_mvars,
r ← mk_mapp ``psigma.mk [α,t],
pure $ r x y
| _ := fail "mk_psigma expects a list of local constants"
/--
Update the type of a local constant or metavariable. For local constants and
metavariables obtained via, for example, `tactic.get_local`, the type stored in
the expression is not necessarily the same as the type returned by `infer_type`.
This tactic, given a local constant or metavariable, updates the stored type to
match the output of `infer_type`. If the input is not a local constant or
metavariable, `update_type` does nothing.
-/
meta def update_type : expr → tactic expr
| e@(expr.local_const ppname uname binfo _) :=
expr.local_const ppname uname binfo <$> infer_type e
| e@(expr.mvar ppname uname _) :=
expr.mvar ppname uname <$> infer_type e
| e := pure e
/-- `elim_gen_prod n e _ ns` with `e` an expression of type `psigma _`, applies `cases` on `e` `n`
times and uses `ns` to name the resulting variables. Returns a triple: list of new variables,
remaining term and unused variable names.
-/
meta def elim_gen_prod : nat → expr → list expr → list name → tactic (list expr × expr × list name)
| 0 e hs ns := return (hs.reverse, e, ns)
| (n + 1) e hs ns := do
t ← infer_type e,
if t.is_app_of `eq then return (hs.reverse, e, ns)
else do
[(_, [h, h'], _)] ← cases_core e (ns.take 1),
elim_gen_prod n h' (h :: hs) (ns.drop 1)
private meta def elim_gen_sum_aux : nat → expr → list expr → tactic (list expr × expr)
| 0 e hs := return (hs, e)
| (n + 1) e hs := do
[(_, [h], _), (_, [h'], _)] ← induction e [],
swap,
elim_gen_sum_aux n h' (h::hs)
/-- `elim_gen_sum n e` applies cases on `e` `n` times. `e` is assumed to be a local constant whose
type is a (nested) sum `⊕`. Returns the list of local constants representing the components of `e`.
-/
meta def elim_gen_sum (n : nat) (e : expr) : tactic (list expr) := do
(hs, h') ← elim_gen_sum_aux n e [],
gs ← get_goals,
set_goals $ (gs.take (n+1)).reverse ++ gs.drop (n+1),
return $ hs.reverse ++ [h']
/-- Given `elab_def`, a tactic to solve the current goal,
`extract_def n trusted elab_def` will create an auxiliary definition named `n` and use it
to close the goal. If `trusted` is false, it will be a meta definition. -/
meta def extract_def (n : name) (trusted : bool) (elab_def : tactic unit) : tactic unit :=
do cxt ← list.map expr.to_implicit_local_const <$> local_context,
t ← target,
(eqns,d) ← solve_aux t elab_def,
d ← instantiate_mvars d,
t' ← pis cxt t,
d' ← lambdas cxt d,
let univ := t'.collect_univ_params,
add_decl $ declaration.defn n univ t' d' (reducibility_hints.regular 1 tt) trusted,
applyc n
/-- Attempts to close the goal with `dec_trivial`. -/
meta def exact_dec_trivial : tactic unit := `[exact dec_trivial]
/-- Runs a tactic for a result, reverting the state after completion. -/
meta def retrieve {α} (tac : tactic α) : tactic α :=
λ s, result.cases_on (tac s)
(λ a s', result.success a s)
result.exception
/-- Runs a tactic for a result, reverting the state after completion or error. -/
meta def retrieve' {α} (tac : tactic α) : tactic α :=
λ s, result.cases_on (tac s)
(λ a s', result.success a s)
(λ msg pos s', result.exception msg pos s)
/-- Repeat a tactic at least once, calling it recursively on all subgoals,
until it fails. This tactic fails if the first invocation fails. -/
meta def repeat1 (t : tactic unit) : tactic unit := t; repeat t
/-- `iterate_range m n t`: Repeat the given tactic at least `m` times and
at most `n` times or until `t` fails. Fails if `t` does not run at least `m` times. -/
meta def iterate_range : ℕ → ℕ → tactic unit → tactic unit
| 0 0 t := skip
| 0 (n+1) t := try (t >> iterate_range 0 n t)
| (m+1) n t := t >> iterate_range m (n-1) t
/--
Given a tactic `tac` that takes an expression
and returns a new expression and a proof of equality,
use that tactic to change the type of the hypotheses listed in `hs`,
as well as the goal if `tgt = tt`.
Returns `tt` if any types were successfully changed.
-/
meta def replace_at (tac : expr → tactic (expr × expr)) (hs : list expr) (tgt : bool) :
tactic bool :=
do to_remove ← hs.mfilter $ λ h, do {
h_type ← infer_type h,
succeeds $ do
(new_h_type, pr) ← tac h_type,
assert h.local_pp_name new_h_type,
mk_eq_mp pr h >>= tactic.exact },
goal_simplified ← succeeds $ do {
guard tgt,
(new_t, pr) ← target >>= tac,
replace_target new_t pr },
to_remove.mmap' (λ h, try (clear h)),
return (¬ to_remove.empty ∨ goal_simplified)
/-- `revert_after e` reverts all local constants after local constant `e`. -/
meta def revert_after (e : expr) : tactic ℕ := do
l ← local_context,
[pos] ← return $ l.indexes_of e | pp e >>= λ s, fail format!"No such local constant {s}",
let l := l.drop pos.succ, -- all local hypotheses after `e`
revert_lst l
/-- `revert_target_deps` reverts all local constants on which the target depends (recursively).
Returns the number of local constants that have been reverted. -/
meta def revert_target_deps : tactic ℕ :=
do tgt ← target,
ctx ← local_context,
l ← ctx.mfilter (kdepends_on tgt),
n ← revert_lst l,
if l = [] then return n
else do m ← revert_target_deps, return (m + n)
/-- `generalize' e n` generalizes the target with respect to `e`. It creates a new local constant
with name `n` of the same type as `e` and replaces all occurrences of `e` by `n`.
`generalize'` is similar to `generalize` but also succeeds when `e` does not occur in the
goal, in which case it just calls `assert`.
In contrast to `generalize` it already introduces the generalized variable. -/
meta def generalize' (e : expr) (n : name) : tactic expr :=
(generalize e n >> intro n) <|> note n none e
/--
`intron_no_renames n` calls `intro` `n` times, using the pretty-printing name
provided by the binder to name the new local constant.
Unlike `intron`, it does not rename introduced constants if the names shadow existing constants.
-/
meta def intron_no_renames : ℕ → tactic unit
| 0 := pure ()
| (n+1) := do
expr.pi pp_n _ _ _ ← target,
intro pp_n,
intron_no_renames n
/-- `get_univ_level t` returns the universe level of a type `t` -/
meta def get_univ_level (t : expr) (md := semireducible) (unfold_ginductive := tt) :
tactic level :=
do expr.sort u ← infer_type t >>= λ s, whnf s md unfold_ginductive |
fail "get_univ_level: argument is not a type",
return u
/-!
### Various tactics related to local definitions (local constants of the form `x : α := t`)
We call `t` the value of `x`.
-/
/-- `local_def_value e` returns the value of the expression `e`, assuming that `e` has been defined
locally using a `let` expression. Otherwise it fails. -/
meta def local_def_value (e : expr) : tactic expr :=
pp e >>= λ s, -- running `pp` here, because we cannot access it in the `type_context` monad.
tactic.unsafe.type_context.run $ do
lctx <- tactic.unsafe.type_context.get_local_context,
some ldecl <- return $ lctx.get_local_decl e.local_uniq_name |
tactic.unsafe.type_context.fail format!"No such hypothesis {s}.",
some let_val <- return ldecl.value |
tactic.unsafe.type_context.fail format!"Variable {e} is not a local definition.",
return let_val
/-- `is_local_def e` succeeds when `e` is a local definition (a local constant of the form
`e : α := t`) and otherwise fails. -/
meta def is_local_def (e : expr) : tactic unit := do
ctx ← unsafe.type_context.get_local_context.run,
(some decl) ← pure $ ctx.get_local_decl e.local_uniq_name |
fail format!"is_local_def: {e} is not a local constant",
when decl.value.is_none $ fail
format!"is_local_def: {e} is not a local definition"
/-- Returns the local definitions from the context. A local definition is a
local constant of the form `e : α := t`. The local definitions are returned in
the order in which they appear in the context. -/
meta def local_defs : tactic (list expr) := do
ctx ← unsafe.type_context.get_local_context.run,
ctx' ← local_context,
ctx'.mfilter $ λ h, do
(some decl) ← pure $ ctx.get_local_decl h.local_uniq_name |
fail format!"local_defs: local {h} not found in the local context",
pure decl.value.is_some
/-- like `split_on_p p xs`, `partition_local_deps_aux vs xs acc` searches for matches in `xs`
(using membership to `vs` instead of a predicate) and breaks `xs` when matches are found.
whereas `split_on_p p xs` removes the matches, `partition_local_deps_aux vs xs acc` includes
them in the following partition. Also, `partition_local_deps_aux vs xs acc` discards the partition
running up to the first match. -/
private def partition_local_deps_aux {α} [decidable_eq α] (vs : list α) :
list α → list α → list (list α)
| [] acc := [acc.reverse]
| (l :: ls) acc :=
if l ∈ vs then acc.reverse :: partition_local_deps_aux ls [l]
else partition_local_deps_aux ls (l :: acc)
/-- `partition_local_deps vs`, with `vs` a list of local constants,
reorders `vs` in the order they appear in the local context together
with the variables that follow them. If local context is `[a,b,c,d,e,f]`,
and that we call `partition_local_deps [d,b]`, we get `[[d,e,f], [b,c]]`.
The head of each list is one of the variables given as a parameter. -/
meta def partition_local_deps (vs : list expr) : tactic (list (list expr)) :=
do ls ← local_context,
pure (partition_local_deps_aux vs ls []).tail.reverse
/-- `clear_value [e₀, e₁, e₂, ...]` clears the body of the local definitions `e₀`, `e₁`, `e₂`, ...
changing them into regular hypotheses. A hypothesis `e : α := t` is changed to `e : α`. The order of
locals `e₀`, `e₁`, `e₂` does not matter as a permutation will be chosen so as to preserve type
correctness. This tactic is called `clearbody` in Coq. -/
meta def clear_value (vs : list expr) : tactic unit := do
ls ← partition_local_deps vs,
ls.mmap' $ λ vs, do
{ revert_lst vs,
(expr.elet v t d b) ← target |
fail format!"Cannot clear the body of {vs.head}. It is not a local definition.",
let e := expr.pi v binder_info.default t b,
type_check e <|>
fail format!"Cannot clear the body of {vs.head}. The resulting goal is not type correct.",
g ← mk_meta_var e,
h ← note `h none g,
tactic.exact $ h d,
gs ← get_goals,
set_goals $ g :: gs },
ls.reverse.mmap' $ λ vs, intro_lst $ vs.map expr.local_pp_name
/--
`context_has_local_def` is true iff there is at least one local definition in
the context.
-/
meta def context_has_local_def : tactic bool := do
ctx ← local_context,
ctx.many (succeeds ∘ local_def_value)
/--
`context_upto_hyp_has_local_def h` is true iff any of the hypotheses in the
context up to and including `h` is a local definition.
-/
meta def context_upto_hyp_has_local_def (h : expr) : tactic bool := do
ff ← succeeds (local_def_value h) | pure tt,
ctx ← local_context,
let ctx := ctx.take_while (≠ h),
ctx.many (succeeds ∘ local_def_value)
/--
If the expression `h` is a local variable with type `x = t` or `t = x`, where `x` is a local
constant, `tactic.subst' h` substitutes `x` by `t` everywhere in the main goal and then clears `h`.
If `h` is another local variable, then we find a local constant with type `h = t` or `t = h` and
substitute `t` for `h`.
This is like `tactic.subst`, but fails with a nicer error message if the substituted variable is a
local definition. It is trickier to fix this in core, since `tactic.is_local_def` is in mathlib.
-/
meta def subst' (h : expr) : tactic unit := do
e ← do { -- we first find the variable being substituted away
t ← infer_type h,
let (f, args) := t.get_app_fn_args,
if (f.const_name = `eq ∨ f.const_name = `heq) then do {
let lhs := args.inth 1,
let rhs := args.ilast,
if rhs.is_local_constant then return rhs else
if lhs.is_local_constant then return lhs else fail
"subst tactic failed, hypothesis '{h.local_pp_name}' is not of the form (x = t) or (t = x)." }
else return h },
success_if_fail (is_local_def e) <|>
fail format!("Cannot substitute variable {e.local_pp_name}, " ++
"it is a local definition. If you really want to do this, use `clear_value` first."),
subst h
/-- A variant of `simplify_bottom_up`. Given a tactic `post` for rewriting subexpressions,
`simp_bottom_up post e` tries to rewrite `e` starting at the leaf nodes. Returns the resulting
expression and a proof of equality. -/
meta def simp_bottom_up' (post : expr → tactic (expr × expr)) (e : expr) (cfg : simp_config := {}) :
tactic (expr × expr) :=
prod.snd <$> simplify_bottom_up () (λ _, (<$>) (prod.mk ()) ∘ post) e cfg
/-- Caches unary type classes on a type `α : Type.{univ}`. -/
meta structure instance_cache :=
(α : expr)
(univ : level)
(inst : name_map expr)
/-- Creates an `instance_cache` for the type `α`. -/
meta def mk_instance_cache (α : expr) : tactic instance_cache :=
do u ← mk_meta_univ,
infer_type α >>= unify (expr.sort (level.succ u)),
u ← get_univ_assignment u,
return ⟨α, u, mk_name_map⟩
namespace instance_cache
/-- If `n` is the name of a type class with one parameter, `get c n` tries to find an instance of
`n c.α` by checking the cache `c`. If there is no entry in the cache, it tries to find the instance
via type class resolution, and updates the cache. -/
meta def get (c : instance_cache) (n : name) : tactic (instance_cache × expr) :=
match c.inst.find n with
| some i := return (c, i)
| none := do e ← mk_app n [c.α] >>= mk_instance,
return (⟨c.α, c.univ, c.inst.insert n e⟩, e)
end
open expr
/-- If `e` is a `pi` expression that binds an instance-implicit variable of type `n`,
`append_typeclasses e c l` searches `c` for an instance `p` of type `n` and returns `p :: l`. -/
meta def append_typeclasses : expr → instance_cache → list expr →
tactic (instance_cache × list expr)
| (pi _ binder_info.inst_implicit (app (const n _) (var _)) body) c l :=
do (c, p) ← c.get n, return (c, p :: l)
| _ c l := return (c, l)
/-- Creates the application `n c.α p l`, where `p` is a type class instance found in the cache `c`.
-/
meta def mk_app (c : instance_cache) (n : name) (l : list expr) : tactic (instance_cache × expr) :=
do d ← get_decl n,
(c, l) ← append_typeclasses d.type.binding_body c l,
return (c, (expr.const n [c.univ]).mk_app (c.α :: l))
/-- `c.of_nat n` creates the `c.α`-valued numeral expression corresponding to `n`. -/
protected meta def of_nat (c : instance_cache) (n : ℕ) : tactic (instance_cache × expr) :=
if n = 0 then c.mk_app ``has_zero.zero [] else do
(c, ai) ← c.get ``has_add,
(c, oi) ← c.get ``has_one,
(c, one) ← c.mk_app ``has_one.one [],
return (c, n.binary_rec one $ λ b n e,
if n = 0 then one else
cond b
((expr.const ``bit1 [c.univ]).mk_app [c.α, oi, ai, e])
((expr.const ``bit0 [c.univ]).mk_app [c.α, ai, e]))
/-- `c.of_int n` creates the `c.α`-valued numeral expression corresponding to `n`.
The output is either a numeral or the negation of a numeral. -/
protected meta def of_int (c : instance_cache) : ℤ → tactic (instance_cache × expr)
| (n : ℕ) := c.of_nat n
| -[1+ n] := do
(c, e) ← c.of_nat (n+1),
c.mk_app ``has_neg.neg [e]
end instance_cache
/-- A variation on `assert` where a (possibly incomplete)
proof of the assertion is provided as a parameter.
``(h,gs) ← local_proof `h p tac`` creates a local `h : p` and
use `tac` to (partially) construct a proof for it. `gs` is the
list of remaining goals in the proof of `h`.
The benefits over assert are:
- unlike with ``h ← assert `h p, tac`` , `h` cannot be used by `tac`;
- when `tac` does not complete the proof of `h`, returning the list
of goals allows one to write a tactic using `h` and with the confidence
that a proof will not boil over to goals left over from the proof of `h`,
unlike what would be the case when using `tactic.swap`.
-/
meta def local_proof (h : name) (p : expr) (tac₀ : tactic unit) :
tactic (expr × list expr) :=
focus1 $
do h' ← assert h p,
[g₀,g₁] ← get_goals,
set_goals [g₀], tac₀,
gs ← get_goals,
set_goals [g₁],
return (h', gs)
/-- `var_names e` returns a list of the unique names of the initial pi bindings in `e`. -/
meta def var_names : expr → list name
| (expr.pi n _ _ b) := n :: var_names b
| _ := []
/-- When `struct_n` is the name of a structure type,
`subobject_names struct_n` returns two lists of names `(instances, fields)`.
The names in `instances` are the projections from `struct_n` to the structures that it extends
(assuming it was defined with `old_structure_cmd false`).
The names in `fields` are the standard fields of `struct_n`. -/
meta def subobject_names (struct_n : name) : tactic (list name × list name) :=
do env ← get_env,
c ← match env.constructors_of struct_n with
| [c] := pure c
| [] :=
if env.is_inductive struct_n
then fail format!"{struct_n} does not have constructors"
else fail format!"{struct_n} is not an inductive type"
| _ := fail "too many constructors"
end,
vs ← var_names <$> (mk_const c >>= infer_type),
fields ← env.structure_fields struct_n,
return $ fields.partition (λ fn, ↑("_" ++ fn.to_string) ∈ vs)
private meta def expanded_field_list' : name → tactic (dlist $ name × name) | struct_n :=
do (so,fs) ← subobject_names struct_n,
ts ← so.mmap (λ n, do
(_, e) ← mk_const (n.update_prefix struct_n) >>= infer_type >>= open_pis,
expanded_field_list' $ e.get_app_fn.const_name),
return $ dlist.join ts ++ dlist.of_list (fs.map $ prod.mk struct_n)
open functor function
/-- `expanded_field_list struct_n` produces a list of the names of the fields of the structure
named `struct_n`. These are returned as pairs of names `(prefix, name)`, where the full name
of the projection is `prefix.name`.
`struct_n` cannot be a synonym for a `structure`, it must be itself a `structure` -/
meta def expanded_field_list (struct_n : name) : tactic (list $ name × name) :=
dlist.to_list <$> expanded_field_list' struct_n
/--
Return a list of all type classes which can be instantiated
for the given expression.
-/
meta def get_classes (e : expr) : tactic (list name) :=
attribute.get_instances `class >>= list.mfilter (λ n,
succeeds $ mk_app n [e] >>= mk_instance)
/--
Finds an instance of an implication `cond → tgt`.
Returns a pair of a local constant `e` of type `cond`, and an instance of `tgt` that can mention
`e`. The local constant `e` is added as an hypothesis to the tactic state, but should not be used,
since it has been "proven" by a metavariable.
-/
meta def mk_conditional_instance (cond tgt : expr) : tactic (expr × expr) := do
f ← mk_meta_var cond,
e ← assertv `c cond f, swap,
reset_instance_cache,
inst ← mk_instance tgt,
return (e, inst)
open nat
/-- Create a list of `n` fresh metavariables. -/
meta def mk_mvar_list : ℕ → tactic (list expr)
| 0 := pure []
| (succ n) := (::) <$> mk_mvar <*> mk_mvar_list n
/-- Returns the only goal, or fails if there isn't just one goal. -/
meta def get_goal : tactic expr :=
do gs ← get_goals,
match gs with
| [a] := return a
| [] := fail "there are no goals"
| _ := fail "there are too many goals"
end
/-- `iterate_at_most_on_all_goals n t`: repeat the given tactic at most `n` times on all goals,
or until it fails. Always succeeds. -/
meta def iterate_at_most_on_all_goals : nat → tactic unit → tactic unit
| 0 tac := trace "maximal iterations reached"
| (succ n) tac := tactic.all_goals' $ (do tac, iterate_at_most_on_all_goals n tac) <|> skip
/-- `iterate_at_most_on_subgoals n t`: repeat the tactic `t` at most `n` times on the first
goal and on all subgoals thus produced, or until it fails. Fails iff `t` fails on
current goal. -/
meta def iterate_at_most_on_subgoals : nat → tactic unit → tactic unit
| 0 tac := trace "maximal iterations reached"
| (succ n) tac := focus1 (do tac, iterate_at_most_on_all_goals n tac)
/-- This makes sure that the execution of the tactic does not change the tactic state.
This can be helpful while using rewrite, apply, or expr munging.
Remember to instantiate your metavariables before you're done! -/
meta def lock_tactic_state {α} (t : tactic α) : tactic α
| s := match t s with
| result.success a s' := result.success a s
| result.exception msg pos s' := result.exception msg pos s
end
/--
`apply_list l`, for `l : list (tactic expr)`,
tries to apply the lemmas generated by the tactics in `l` on the first goal, and
fail if none succeeds.
-/
meta def apply_list_expr (opt : apply_cfg) : list (tactic expr) → tactic unit
| [] := fail "no matching rule"
| (h::t) := (do e ← h, interactive.concat_tags (apply e opt)) <|> apply_list_expr t
/--
Constructs a list of `tactic expr` given a list of p-expressions, as follows:
- if the p-expression is the name of a theorem, use `i_to_expr_for_apply` on it
- if the p-expression is a user attribute, add all the theorems with this attribute
to the list.
We need to return a list of `tactic expr`, rather than just `expr`, because these expressions
will be repeatedly applied against goals, and we need to ensure that metavariables don't get stuck.
-/
meta def build_list_expr_for_apply : list pexpr → tactic (list (tactic expr))
| [] := return []
| (h::t) := do
tail ← build_list_expr_for_apply t,
a ← i_to_expr_for_apply h,
(do l ← attribute.get_instances (expr.const_name a),
m ← l.mmap (λ n, _root_.to_pexpr <$> mk_const n),
-- We reverse the list of lemmas marked with an attribute,
-- on the assumption that lemmas proved earlier are more often applicable
-- than lemmas proved later. This is a performance optimization.
build_list_expr_for_apply (m.reverse ++ t))
<|> return ((i_to_expr_for_apply h) :: tail)
/--`apply_rules hs n`: apply the list of rules `hs` (given as pexpr) and `assumption` on the
first goal and the resulting subgoals, iteratively, at most `n` times.
Unlike `solve_by_elim`, `apply_rules` does not do any backtracking, and just greedily applies
a lemma from the list until it can't.
-/
meta def apply_rules (hs : list pexpr) (n : nat) (opt : apply_cfg) : tactic unit :=
do l ← lock_tactic_state $ build_list_expr_for_apply hs,
iterate_at_most_on_subgoals n (assumption <|> apply_list_expr opt l)
/-- `replace h p` elaborates the pexpr `p`, clears the existing hypothesis named `h` from the local
context, and adds a new hypothesis named `h`. The type of this hypothesis is the type of `p`.
Fails if there is nothing named `h` in the local context. -/
meta def replace (h : name) (p : pexpr) : tactic unit :=
do h' ← get_local h,
p ← to_expr p,
note h none p,
clear h'
/-- Auxiliary function for `iff_mp` and `iff_mpr`. Takes a name, which should be either `` `iff.mp``
or `` `iff.mpr``. If the passed expression is an iterated function type eventually producing an
`iff`, returns an expression with the `iff` converted to either the forwards or backwards
implication, as requested. -/
meta def mk_iff_mp_app (iffmp : name) : expr → (nat → expr) → option expr
| (expr.pi n bi e t) f := expr.lam n bi e <$> mk_iff_mp_app t (λ n, f (n+1) (expr.var n))
| `(%%a ↔ %%b) f := some $ @expr.const tt iffmp [] a b (f 0)
| _ f := none
/-- `iff_mp_core e ty` assumes that `ty` is the type of `e`.
If `ty` has the shape `Π ..., A ↔ B`, returns an expression whose type is `Π ..., A → B`. -/
meta def iff_mp_core (e ty: expr) : option expr :=
mk_iff_mp_app `iff.mp ty (λ_, e)
/-- `iff_mpr_core e ty` assumes that `ty` is the type of `e`.
If `ty` has the shape `Π ..., A ↔ B`, returns an expression whose type is `Π ..., B → A`. -/
meta def iff_mpr_core (e ty: expr) : option expr :=
mk_iff_mp_app `iff.mpr ty (λ_, e)
/-- Given an expression whose type is (a possibly iterated function producing) an `iff`,
create the expression which is the forward implication. -/
meta def iff_mp (e : expr) : tactic expr :=
do t ← infer_type e,
iff_mp_core e t <|> fail "Target theorem must have the form `Π x y z, a ↔ b`"
/-- Given an expression whose type is (a possibly iterated function producing) an `iff`,
create the expression which is the reverse implication. -/
meta def iff_mpr (e : expr) : tactic expr :=
do t ← infer_type e,
iff_mpr_core e t <|> fail "Target theorem must have the form `Π x y z, a ↔ b`"
/--
Attempts to apply `e`, and if that fails, if `e` is an `iff`,
try applying both directions separately.
-/
meta def apply_iff (e : expr) : tactic (list (name × expr)) :=
let ap e := tactic.apply e {new_goals := new_goals.non_dep_only} in
ap e <|> (iff_mp e >>= ap) <|> (iff_mpr e >>= ap)
/--
Configuration options for `apply_any`:
* `use_symmetry`: if `apply_any` fails to apply any lemma, call `symmetry` and try again.
* `use_exfalso`: if `apply_any` fails to apply any lemma, call `exfalso` and try again.
* `apply`: specify an alternative to `tactic.apply`; usually `apply := tactic.eapply`.
-/
meta structure apply_any_opt extends apply_cfg :=
(use_symmetry : bool := tt)
(use_exfalso : bool := tt)
/--
This is a version of `apply_any` that takes a list of `tactic expr`s instead of `expr`s,
and evaluates these as thunks before trying to apply them.
We need to do this to avoid metavariables getting stuck during subsequent rounds of `apply`.
-/
meta def apply_any_thunk
(lemmas : list (tactic expr))
(opt : apply_any_opt := {})
(tac : tactic unit := skip)
(on_success : expr → tactic unit := (λ _, skip))
(on_failure : tactic unit := skip) : tactic unit :=
do
let modes := [skip]
++ (if opt.use_symmetry then [symmetry] else [])
++ (if opt.use_exfalso then [exfalso] else []),
modes.any_of (λ m, do m,
lemmas.any_of (λ H, H >>= (λ e, do apply e opt.to_apply_cfg, on_success e, tac))) <|>
(on_failure >> fail "apply_any tactic failed; no lemma could be applied")
/--
`apply_any lemmas` tries to apply one of the list `lemmas` to the current goal.
`apply_any lemmas opt` allows control over how lemmas are applied.
`opt` has fields:
* `use_symmetry`: if no lemma applies, call `symmetry` and try again. (Defaults to `tt`.)
* `use_exfalso`: if no lemma applies, call `exfalso` and try again. (Defaults to `tt`.)
* `apply`: use a tactic other than `tactic.apply` (e.g. `tactic.fapply` or `tactic.eapply`).
`apply_any lemmas tac` calls the tactic `tac` after a successful application.
Defaults to `skip`. This is used, for example, by `solve_by_elim` to arrange
recursive invocations of `apply_any`.
-/
meta def apply_any
(lemmas : list expr)
(opt : apply_any_opt := {})
(tac : tactic unit := skip) : tactic unit :=
apply_any_thunk (lemmas.map pure) opt tac
/-- Try to apply a hypothesis from the local context to the goal. -/
meta def apply_assumption : tactic unit :=
local_context >>= apply_any
/-- `change_core e none` is equivalent to `change e`. It tries to change the goal to `e` and fails
if this is not a definitional equality.
`change_core e (some h)` assumes `h` is a local constant, and tries to change the type of `h` to `e`
by reverting `h`, changing the goal, and reintroducing hypotheses. -/
meta def change_core (e : expr) : option expr → tactic unit
| none := tactic.change e
| (some h) :=
do num_reverted : ℕ ← revert h,
expr.pi n bi d b ← target,
tactic.change $ expr.pi n bi e b,
intron num_reverted
/--
`change_with_at olde newe hyp` replaces occurences of `olde` with `newe` at hypothesis `hyp`,
assuming `olde` and `newe` are defeq when elaborated.
-/
meta def change_with_at (olde newe : pexpr) (hyp : name) : tactic unit :=
do h ← get_local hyp,
tp ← infer_type h,
olde ← to_expr olde, newe ← to_expr newe,
let repl_tp := tp.replace (λ a n, if a = olde then some newe else none),
when (repl_tp ≠ tp) $ change_core repl_tp (some h)
/-- Returns a list of all metavariables in the current partial proof. This can differ from
the list of goals, since the goals can be manually edited. -/
meta def metavariables : tactic (list expr) :=
expr.list_meta_vars <$> result
/--
`sorry_if_contains_sorry` will solve any goal already containing `sorry` in its type with `sorry`,
and fail otherwise.
-/
meta def sorry_if_contains_sorry : tactic unit :=
do
g ← target,
guard g.contains_sorry <|> fail "goal does not contain `sorrry`",
tactic.admit
/-- Fail if the target contains a metavariable. -/
meta def no_mvars_in_target : tactic unit :=
expr.has_meta_var <$> target >>= guardb ∘ bnot
/-- Succeeds only if the current goal is a proposition. -/
meta def propositional_goal : tactic unit :=
do g :: _ ← get_goals,
is_proof g >>= guardb
/-- Succeeds only if we can construct an instance showing the
current goal is a subsingleton type. -/
meta def subsingleton_goal : tactic unit :=
do g :: _ ← get_goals,
ty ← infer_type g >>= instantiate_mvars,
to_expr ``(subsingleton %%ty) >>= mk_instance >> skip
/--
Succeeds only if the current goal is "terminal",
in the sense that no other goals depend on it
(except possibly through shared metavariables; see `independent_goal`).
-/
meta def terminal_goal : tactic unit :=
propositional_goal <|> subsingleton_goal <|>
do g₀ :: _ ← get_goals,
mvars ← (λ L, list.erase L g₀) <$> metavariables,
mvars.mmap' $ λ g, do
t ← infer_type g >>= instantiate_mvars,
d ← kdepends_on t g₀,
monad.whenb d $
pp t >>= λ s, fail ("The current goal is not terminal: " ++ s.to_string ++ " depends on it.")
/--
Succeeds only if the current goal is "independent", in the sense
that no other goals depend on it, even through shared meta-variables.
-/
meta def independent_goal : tactic unit :=
no_mvars_in_target >> terminal_goal
/-- `triv'` tries to close the first goal with the proof `trivial : true`. Unlike `triv`,
it only unfolds reducible definitions, so it sometimes fails faster. -/
meta def triv' : tactic unit := do c ← mk_const `trivial, exact c reducible
variable {α : Type}
/-- Apply a tactic as many times as possible, collecting the results in a list.
Fail if the tactic does not succeed at least once. -/
meta def iterate1 (t : tactic α) : tactic (list α) :=
do r ← decorate_ex "iterate1 failed: tactic did not succeed" t,
L ← iterate t,
return (r :: L)
/-- Introduces one or more variables and returns the new local constants.
Fails if `intro` cannot be applied. -/
meta def intros1 : tactic (list expr) :=
iterate1 intro1
/-- Run a tactic "under binders", by running `intros` before, and `revert` afterwards. -/
meta def under_binders {α : Type} (t : tactic α) : tactic α :=
do
v ← intros,
r ← t,
revert_lst v,
return r
namespace interactive
/-- Run a tactic "under binders", by running `intros` before, and `revert` afterwards. -/
meta def under_binders (i : itactic) : itactic := tactic.under_binders i
end interactive
/-- `successes` invokes each tactic in turn, returning the list of successful results. -/
meta def successes (tactics : list (tactic α)) : tactic (list α) :=
list.filter_map id <$> monad.sequence (tactics.map (λ t, try_core t))
/--
Try all the tactics in a list, each time starting at the original `tactic_state`,
returning the list of successful results,
and reverting to the original `tactic_state`.
-/
-- Note this is not the same as `successes`, which keeps track of the evolving `tactic_state`.
meta def try_all {α : Type} (tactics : list (tactic α)) : tactic (list α) :=
λ s, result.success
(tactics.map $
λ t : tactic α,
match t s with
| result.success a s' := [a]
| _ := []
end).join s
/--
Try all the tactics in a list, each time starting at the original `tactic_state`,
returning the list of successful results sorted by
the value produced by a subsequent execution of the `sort_by` tactic,
and reverting to the original `tactic_state`.
-/
meta def try_all_sorted {α : Type} (tactics : list (tactic α)) (sort_by : tactic ℕ := num_goals) :
tactic (list (α × ℕ)) :=
λ s, result.success
((tactics.map $
λ t : tactic α,
match (do a ← t, n ← sort_by, return (a, n)) s with
| result.success a s' := [a]
| _ := []
end).join.qsort (λ p q : α × ℕ, p.2 < q.2)) s
/-- Return target after instantiating metavars and whnf. -/
private meta def target' : tactic expr :=
target >>= instantiate_mvars >>= whnf
/--
Just like `split`, `fsplit` applies the constructor when the type of the target is
an inductive data type with one constructor.
However it does not reorder goals or invoke `auto_param` tactics.
-/
-- FIXME check if we can remove `auto_param := ff`
meta def fsplit : tactic unit :=
do [c] ← target' >>= get_constructors_for |
fail "fsplit tactic failed, target is not an inductive datatype with only one constructor",
mk_const c >>= λ e, apply e {new_goals := new_goals.all, auto_param := ff} >> skip
run_cmd add_interactive [`fsplit]
add_tactic_doc
{ name := "fsplit",
category := doc_category.tactic,
decl_names := [`tactic.interactive.fsplit],
tags := ["logic", "goal management"] }
/-- Calls `injection` on each hypothesis, and then, for each hypothesis on which `injection`
succeeds, clears the old hypothesis. -/
meta def injections_and_clear : tactic unit :=
do l ← local_context,
results ← successes $ l.map $ λ e, injection e >> clear e,
when (results.empty) (fail "could not use `injection` then `clear` on any hypothesis")
run_cmd add_interactive [`injections_and_clear]
add_tactic_doc
{ name := "injections_and_clear",
category := doc_category.tactic,
decl_names := [`tactic.interactive.injections_and_clear],
tags := ["context management"] }
/-- Calls `cases` on every local hypothesis, succeeding if
it succeeds on at least one hypothesis. -/
meta def case_bash : tactic unit :=
do l ← local_context,
r ← successes (l.reverse.map (λ h, cases h >> skip)),
when (r.empty) failed
/--
`note_anon t v`, given a proof `v : t`,
adds `h : t` to the current context, where the name `h` is fresh.
`note_anon none v` will infer the type `t` from `v`.
-/
-- While `note` provides a default value for `t`, it doesn't seem this could ever be used.
meta def note_anon (t : option expr) (v : expr) : tactic expr :=
do h ← get_unused_name `h none,
note h t v
/-- `find_local t` returns a local constant with type t, or fails if none exists. -/
meta def find_local (t : pexpr) : tactic expr :=
do t' ← to_expr t,
(prod.snd <$> solve_aux t' assumption >>= instantiate_mvars) <|>
fail format!"No hypothesis found of the form: {t'}"
/-- `dependent_pose_core l`: introduce dependent hypotheses, where the proofs depend on the values
of the previous local constants. `l` is a list of local constants and their values. -/
meta def dependent_pose_core (l : list (expr × expr)) : tactic unit := do
let lc := l.map prod.fst,
let lm := l.map (λ⟨l, v⟩, (l.local_uniq_name, v)),
old::other_goals ← get_goals,
t ← infer_type old,
new_goal ← mk_meta_var (t.pis lc),
set_goals (old :: new_goal :: other_goals),
exact ((new_goal.mk_app lc).instantiate_locals lm),
return ()
/--
Instantiates metavariables that appear in the current goal.
-/
meta def instantiate_mvars_in_target : tactic unit :=
target >>= instantiate_mvars >>= change
/--
Instantiates metavariables in all goals.
-/
meta def instantiate_mvars_in_goals : tactic unit :=
all_goals' $ instantiate_mvars_in_target
/-- Protect the declaration `n` -/
meta def mk_protected (n : name) : tactic unit :=
do env ← get_env, set_env (env.mk_protected n)
end tactic
namespace lean.parser
open tactic interaction_monad
/-- `emit_command_here str` behaves as if the string `str` were placed as a user command at the
current line. -/
meta def emit_command_here (str : string) : lean.parser string :=
do (_, left) ← with_input command_like str,
return left
/-- Inner recursion for `emit_code_here`. -/
meta def emit_code_here_aux : string → ℕ → lean.parser unit
| str slen := do
left ← emit_command_here str,
let llen := left.length,
when (llen < slen ∧ llen ≠ 0) (emit_code_here_aux left llen)
/-- `emit_code_here str` behaves as if the string `str` were placed at the current location in
source code. -/
meta def emit_code_here (s : string) : lean.parser unit := emit_code_here_aux s s.length
/-- `run_parser p` is like `run_cmd` but for the parser monad. It executes parser `p` at the
top level, giving access to operations like `emit_code_here`. -/
@[user_command]
meta def run_parser_cmd (_ : interactive.parse $ tk "run_parser") : lean.parser unit :=
do e ← lean.parser.pexpr 0,
p ← eval_pexpr (lean.parser unit) e,
p
add_tactic_doc
{ name := "run_parser",
category := doc_category.cmd,
decl_names := [``run_parser_cmd],
tags := ["parsing"] }
/-- `get_current_namespace` returns the current namespace (it could be `name.anonymous`).
This function deserves a C++ implementation in core lean, and will fail if it is not called from
the body of a command (i.e. anywhere else that the `lean.parser` monad can be invoked). -/
meta def get_current_namespace : lean.parser name :=
do n ← tactic.mk_user_fresh_name,
emit_code_here $ sformat!"def {n} := ()",
nfull ← tactic.resolve_constant n,
return $ nfull.get_nth_prefix n.components.length
/-- `get_variables` returns a list of existing variable names, along with their types and binder
info. -/
meta def get_variables : lean.parser (list (name × binder_info × expr)) :=
list.map expr.get_local_const_kind <$> list_available_include_vars
/-- `get_included_variables` returns those variables `v` returned by `get_variables` which have been
"included" by an `include v` statement and are not (yet) `omit`ed. -/
meta def get_included_variables : lean.parser (list (name × binder_info × expr)) :=
do ns ← list_include_var_names,
list.filter (λ v, v.1 ∈ ns) <$> get_variables
/-- From the `lean.parser` monad, synthesize a `tactic_state` which includes all of the local
variables referenced in `es : list pexpr`, and those variables which have been `include`ed in the
local context---precisely those variables which would be ambiently accessible if we were in a
tactic-mode block where the goals had types `es.mmap to_expr`, for example.
Returns a new `ts : tactic_state` with these local variables added, and
`mappings : list (expr × expr)`, for which pairs `(var, hyp)` correspond to an existing variable
`var` and the local hypothesis `hyp` which was added to the tactic state `ts` as a result. -/
meta def synthesize_tactic_state_with_variables_as_hyps (es : list pexpr)
: lean.parser (tactic_state × list (expr × expr)) :=
do /- First, in order to get `to_expr e` to resolve declared `variables`, we add all of the
declared variables to a fake `tactic_state`, and perform the resolution. At the end,
`to_expr e` has done the work of determining which variables were actually referenced, which
we then obtain from `fe` via `expr.list_local_consts` (which, importantly, is not defined for
`pexpr`s). -/
vars ← list_available_include_vars,
fake_es ← lean.parser.of_tactic $ lock_tactic_state $ do {
/- Note that `add_local_consts_as_local_hyps` returns the mappings it generated, but we discard
them on this first pass. (We return the mappings generated by our second invocation of this
function below.) -/
add_local_consts_as_local_hyps vars,
es.mmap to_expr },
/- Now calculate lists of a) the explicitly `include`ed variables and b) the variables which were
referenced in `e` when it was resolved to `fake_e`.
It is important that we include variables of the kind a) because we want `simp` to have access
to declared local instances, and it is important that we only restrict to variables of kind a)
and b) together since we do not to recognise a hypothesis which is posited as a `variable`
in the environment but not referenced in the `pexpr` we were passed.
One use case for this behaviour is running `simp` on the passed `pexpr`, since we do not want
simp to use arbitrary hypotheses which were declared as `variables` in the local environment
but not referenced in the expression to simplify (as one would be expect generally in tactic
mode). -/
included_vars ← list_include_var_names,
let referenced_vars := list.join $ fake_es.map $ λ e, e.list_local_consts.map expr.local_pp_name,
/- Look up the explicit `included_vars` and the `referenced_vars` (which have appeared in the
`pexpr` list which we were passed.) -/
let directly_included_vars := vars.filter $ λ var,
(var.local_pp_name ∈ included_vars) ∨ (var.local_pp_name ∈ referenced_vars),
/- Inflate the list `directly_included_vars` to include those variables which are "implicitly
included" by virtue of reference to one or multiple others. For example, given
`variables (n : ℕ) [prime n] [ih : even n]`, a reference to `n` implies that the typeclass
instance `prime n` should be included, but `ih : even n` should not. -/
let all_implicitly_included_vars :=
expr.all_implicitly_included_variables vars directly_included_vars,
/- Capture a tactic state where both of these kinds of variables have been added as local
hypotheses, and resolve `e` against this state with `to_expr`, this time for real. -/
lean.parser.of_tactic $ do {
mappings ← add_local_consts_as_local_hyps all_implicitly_included_vars,
ts ← get_state,
return (ts, mappings) }
end lean.parser
namespace tactic
variables {α : Type}
/--
Hole command used to fill in a structure's field when specifying an instance.
In the following:
```lean
instance : monad id :=
{! !}
```
invoking the hole command "Instance Stub" ("Generate a skeleton for the structure under
construction.") produces:
```lean
instance : monad id :=
{ map := _,
map_const := _,
pure := _,
seq := _,
seq_left := _,
seq_right := _,
bind := _ }
```
-/
@[hole_command] meta def instance_stub : hole_command :=
{ name := "Instance Stub",
descr := "Generate a skeleton for the structure under construction.",
action := λ _,
do tgt ← target >>= whnf,
let cl := tgt.get_app_fn.const_name,
env ← get_env,
fs ← expanded_field_list cl,
let fs := fs.map prod.snd,
let fs := format.intercalate (",\n " : format) $ fs.map (λ fn, format!"{fn} := _"),
let out := format.to_string format!"{{ {fs} }",
return [(out,"")] }
add_tactic_doc
{ name := "instance_stub",
category := doc_category.hole_cmd,
decl_names := [`tactic.instance_stub],
tags := ["instances"] }
/-- Like `resolve_name` except when the list of goals is
empty. In that situation `resolve_name` fails whereas
`resolve_name'` simply proceeds on a dummy goal -/
meta def resolve_name' (n : name) : tactic pexpr :=
do [] ← get_goals | resolve_name n,
g ← mk_mvar,
set_goals [g],
resolve_name n <* set_goals []
private meta def strip_prefix' (n : name) : list string → name → tactic name
| s name.anonymous := pure $ s.foldl (flip name.mk_string) name.anonymous
| s (name.mk_string a p) :=
do let n' := s.foldl (flip name.mk_string) name.anonymous,
do { n'' ← tactic.resolve_constant n',
if n'' = n
then pure n'
else strip_prefix' (a :: s) p }
<|> strip_prefix' (a :: s) p
| s n@(name.mk_numeral a p) := pure $ s.foldl (flip name.mk_string) n
/-- Strips unnecessary prefixes from a name, e.g. if a namespace is open. -/
meta def strip_prefix : name → tactic name
| n@(name.mk_string a a_1) :=
if (`_private).is_prefix_of n
then let n' := n.update_prefix name.anonymous in
n' <$ resolve_name' n' <|> pure n
else strip_prefix' n [a] a_1
| n := pure n
/-- Used to format return strings for the hole commands `match_stub` and `eqn_stub`. -/
meta def mk_patterns (t : expr) : tactic (list format) :=
do let cl := t.get_app_fn.const_name,
env ← get_env,
let fs := env.constructors_of cl,
fs.mmap $ λ f,
do { (vs,_) ← mk_const f >>= infer_type >>= open_pis,
let vs := vs.filter (λ v, v.is_default_local),
vs ← vs.mmap (λ v,
do v' ← get_unused_name v.local_pp_name,
pose v' none `(()),
pure v' ),
vs.mmap' $ λ v, get_local v >>= clear,
let args := list.intersperse (" " : format) $ vs.map to_fmt,
f ← strip_prefix f,
if args.empty
then pure $ format!"| {f} := _\n"
else pure format!"| ({f} {format.join args}) := _\n" }
/--
Hole command used to generate a `match` expression.
In the following:
```lean
meta def foo (e : expr) : tactic unit :=
{! e !}
```
invoking hole command "Match Stub" ("Generate a list of equations for a `match` expression")
produces:
```lean
meta def foo (e : expr) : tactic unit :=
match e with
| (expr.var a) := _
| (expr.sort a) := _
| (expr.const a a_1) := _
| (expr.mvar a a_1 a_2) := _
| (expr.local_const a a_1 a_2 a_3) := _
| (expr.app a a_1) := _
| (expr.lam a a_1 a_2 a_3) := _
| (expr.pi a a_1 a_2 a_3) := _
| (expr.elet a a_1 a_2 a_3) := _
| (expr.macro a a_1) := _
end
```
-/
@[hole_command] meta def match_stub : hole_command :=
{ name := "Match Stub",
descr := "Generate a list of equations for a `match` expression.",
action := λ es,
do [e] ← pure es | fail "expecting one expression",
e ← to_expr e,
t ← infer_type e >>= whnf,
fs ← mk_patterns t,
e ← pp e,
let out := format.to_string format!"match {e} with\n{format.join fs}end\n",
return [(out,"")] }
add_tactic_doc
{ name := "Match Stub",
category := doc_category.hole_cmd,
decl_names := [`tactic.match_stub],
tags := ["pattern matching"] }
/--
Invoking hole command "Equations Stub" ("Generate a list of equations for a recursive definition")
in the following:
```lean
meta def foo : {! expr → tactic unit !} -- `:=` is omitted
```
produces:
```lean
meta def foo : expr → tactic unit
| (expr.var a) := _
| (expr.sort a) := _
| (expr.const a a_1) := _
| (expr.mvar a a_1 a_2) := _
| (expr.local_const a a_1 a_2 a_3) := _
| (expr.app a a_1) := _
| (expr.lam a a_1 a_2 a_3) := _
| (expr.pi a a_1 a_2 a_3) := _
| (expr.elet a a_1 a_2 a_3) := _
| (expr.macro a a_1) := _
```
A similar result can be obtained by invoking "Equations Stub" on the following:
```lean
meta def foo : expr → tactic unit := -- do not forget to write `:=`!!
{! !}
```
```lean
meta def foo : expr → tactic unit := -- don't forget to erase `:=`!!
| (expr.var a) := _
| (expr.sort a) := _
| (expr.const a a_1) := _
| (expr.mvar a a_1 a_2) := _
| (expr.local_const a a_1 a_2 a_3) := _
| (expr.app a a_1) := _
| (expr.lam a a_1 a_2 a_3) := _
| (expr.pi a a_1 a_2 a_3) := _
| (expr.elet a a_1 a_2 a_3) := _
| (expr.macro a a_1) := _
```
-/
@[hole_command] meta def eqn_stub : hole_command :=
{ name := "Equations Stub",
descr := "Generate a list of equations for a recursive definition.",
action := λ es,
do t ← match es with
| [t] := to_expr t
| [] := target
| _ := fail "expecting one type"
end,
e ← whnf t,
(v :: _,_) ← open_pis e | fail "expecting a Pi-type",
t' ← infer_type v,
fs ← mk_patterns t',
t ← pp t,
let out :=
if es.empty then
format.to_string format!"-- do not forget to erase `:=`!!\n{format.join fs}"
else format.to_string format!"{t}\n{format.join fs}",
return [(out,"")] }
add_tactic_doc
{ name := "Equations Stub",
category := doc_category.hole_cmd,
decl_names := [`tactic.eqn_stub],
tags := ["pattern matching"] }
/--
This command lists the constructors that can be used to satisfy the expected type.
Invoking "List Constructors" ("Show the list of constructors of the expected type")
in the following hole:
```lean
def foo : ℤ ⊕ ℕ :=
{! !}
```
produces:
```lean
def foo : ℤ ⊕ ℕ :=
{! sum.inl, sum.inr !}
```
and will display:
```lean
sum.inl : ℤ → ℤ ⊕ ℕ
sum.inr : ℕ → ℤ ⊕ ℕ
```
-/
@[hole_command] meta def list_constructors_hole : hole_command :=
{ name := "List Constructors",
descr := "Show the list of constructors of the expected type.",
action := λ es,
do t ← target >>= whnf,
(_,t) ← open_pis t,
let cl := t.get_app_fn.const_name,
let args := t.get_app_args,
env ← get_env,
let cs := env.constructors_of cl,
ts ← cs.mmap $ λ c,
do { e ← mk_const c,
t ← infer_type (e.mk_app args) >>= pp,
c ← strip_prefix c,
pure format!"\n{c} : {t}\n" },
fs ← format.intercalate ", " <$> cs.mmap (strip_prefix >=> pure ∘ to_fmt),
let out := format.to_string format!"{{! {fs} !}",
trace (format.join ts).to_string,
return [(out,"")] }
add_tactic_doc
{ name := "List Constructors",
category := doc_category.hole_cmd,
decl_names := [`tactic.list_constructors_hole],
tags := ["goal information"] }
/-- Makes the declaration `classical.prop_decidable` available to type class inference.
This asserts that all propositions are decidable, but does not have computational content. -/
meta def classical : tactic unit :=
do h ← get_unused_name `_inst,
mk_const `classical.prop_decidable >>= note h none,
reset_instance_cache
open expr
/-- `mk_comp v e` checks whether `e` is a sequence of nested applications `f (g (h v))`, and if so,
returns the expression `f ∘ g ∘ h`. -/
meta def mk_comp (v : expr) : expr → tactic expr
| (app f e) :=
if e = v then pure f
else do
guard (¬ v.occurs f) <|> fail "bad guard",
e' ← mk_comp e >>= instantiate_mvars,
f ← instantiate_mvars f,
mk_mapp ``function.comp [none,none,none,f,e']
| e :=
do guard (e = v),
t ← infer_type e,
mk_mapp ``id [t]
/-- Given two expressions `e₀` and `e₁`, return the expression `` `(%%e₀ ↔ %%e₁)``. -/
meta def mk_iff (e₀ : expr) (e₁ : expr) : expr := `(%%e₀ ↔ %%e₁)
/--
From a lemma of the shape `∀ x, f (g x) = h x`
derive an auxiliary lemma of the form `f ∘ g = h`
for reasoning about higher-order functions.
-/
meta def mk_higher_order_type : expr → tactic expr
| (pi n bi d b@(pi _ _ _ _)) :=
do v ← mk_local_def n d,
let b' := (b.instantiate_var v),
(pi n bi d ∘ flip abstract_local v.local_uniq_name) <$> mk_higher_order_type b'
| (pi n bi d b) :=
do v ← mk_local_def n d,
let b' := (b.instantiate_var v),
(l,r) ← match_eq b' <|> fail format!"not an equality {b'}",
l' ← mk_comp v l,
r' ← mk_comp v r,
mk_app ``eq [l',r']
| e := failed
open lean.parser interactive.types
/-- A user attribute that applies to lemmas of the shape `∀ x, f (g x) = h x`.
It derives an auxiliary lemma of the form `f ∘ g = h` for reasoning about higher-order functions.
-/
@[user_attribute]
meta def higher_order_attr : user_attribute unit (option name) :=
{ name := `higher_order,
parser := optional ident,
descr :=
"From a lemma of the shape `∀ x, f (g x) = h x` derive an auxiliary lemma of the
form `f ∘ g = h` for reasoning about higher-order functions.",
after_set := some $ λ lmm _ _,
do env ← get_env,
decl ← env.get lmm,
let num := decl.univ_params.length,
let lvls := (list.iota num).map (`l).append_after,
let l : expr := expr.const lmm $ lvls.map level.param,
t ← infer_type l >>= instantiate_mvars,
t' ← mk_higher_order_type t,
(_,pr) ← solve_aux t' $ do {
intros, applyc ``_root_.funext, intro1, applyc lmm; assumption },
pr ← instantiate_mvars pr,
lmm' ← higher_order_attr.get_param lmm,
lmm' ← (flip name.update_prefix lmm.get_prefix <$> lmm') <|> pure lmm.add_prime,
add_decl $ declaration.thm lmm' lvls t' (pure pr),
copy_attribute `simp lmm lmm',
copy_attribute `functor_norm lmm lmm' }
add_tactic_doc
{ name := "higher_order",
category := doc_category.attr,
decl_names := [`tactic.higher_order_attr],
tags := ["lemma derivation"] }
attribute [higher_order map_comp_pure] map_pure
/--
Copies a definition into the `tactic.interactive` namespace to make it usable
in proof scripts. It allows one to write
```lean
@[interactive]
meta def my_tactic := ...
```
instead of
```lean
meta def my_tactic := ...
run_cmd add_interactive [``my_tactic]
```
-/
@[user_attribute]
meta def interactive_attr : user_attribute :=
{ name := `interactive,
descr :=
"Put a definition in the `tactic.interactive` namespace to make it usable
in proof scripts.",
after_set := some $ λ tac _ _, add_interactive [tac] }
add_tactic_doc
{ name := "interactive",
category := doc_category.attr,
decl_names := [``tactic.interactive_attr],
tags := ["environment"] }
/--
Use `refine` to partially discharge the goal,
or call `fconstructor` and try again.
-/
private meta def use_aux (h : pexpr) : tactic unit :=
(focus1 (refine h >> done)) <|> (fconstructor >> use_aux)
/-- Similar to `existsi`, `use l` will use entries in `l` to instantiate existential obligations
at the beginning of a target. Unlike `existsi`, the pexprs in `l` are elaborated with respect to
the expected type.
```lean
example : ∃ x : ℤ, x = x :=
by tactic.use ``(42)
```
See the doc string for `tactic.interactive.use` for more information.
-/
protected meta def use (l : list pexpr) : tactic unit :=
focus1 $ seq' (l.mmap' $ λ h, use_aux h <|> fail format!"failed to instantiate goal with {h}")
instantiate_mvars_in_target
/-- `clear_aux_decl_aux l` clears all expressions in `l` that represent aux decls from the
local context. -/
meta def clear_aux_decl_aux : list expr → tactic unit
| [] := skip
| (e::l) := do cond e.is_aux_decl (tactic.clear e) skip, clear_aux_decl_aux l
/-- `clear_aux_decl` clears all expressions from the local context that represent aux decls. -/
meta def clear_aux_decl : tactic unit :=
local_context >>= clear_aux_decl_aux
/-- `apply_at_aux e et [] h ht` (with `et` the type of `e` and `ht` the type of `h`)
finds a list of expressions `vs` and returns `(e.mk_args (vs ++ [h]), vs)`. -/
meta def apply_at_aux (arg t : expr) : list expr → expr → expr → tactic (expr × list expr)
| vs e (pi n bi d b) :=
do { v ← mk_meta_var d,
apply_at_aux (v :: vs) (e v) (b.instantiate_var v) } <|>
(e arg, vs) <$ unify d t
| vs e _ := failed
/-- `apply_at e h` applies implication `e` on hypothesis `h` and replaces `h` with the result. -/
meta def apply_at (e h : expr) : tactic unit :=
do ht ← infer_type h,
et ← infer_type e,
(h', gs') ← apply_at_aux h ht [] e et,
note h.local_pp_name none h',
clear h,
gs' ← gs'.mfilter is_assigned,
(g :: gs) ← get_goals,
set_goals (g :: gs' ++ gs)
/-- `symmetry_hyp h` applies `symmetry` on hypothesis `h`. -/
meta def symmetry_hyp (h : expr) (md := semireducible) : tactic unit :=
do tgt ← infer_type h,
env ← get_env,
let r := get_app_fn tgt,
match env.symm_for (const_name r) with
| (some symm) := do s ← mk_const symm,
apply_at s h
| none := fail
"symmetry tactic failed, target is not a relation application with the expected property."
end
/-- `setup_tactic_parser` is a user command that opens the namespaces used in writing
interactive tactics, and declares the local postfix notation `?` for `optional` and `*` for `many`.
It does *not* use the `namespace` command, so it will typically be used after
`namespace tactic.interactive`.
-/
@[user_command]
meta def setup_tactic_parser_cmd (_ : interactive.parse $ tk "setup_tactic_parser") :
lean.parser unit :=
emit_code_here "
open lean
open lean.parser
open interactive interactive.types
local postfix `?`:9001 := optional
local postfix *:9001 := many .
"
/-- `finally tac finalizer` runs `tac` first, then runs `finalizer` even if
`tac` fails. `finally tac finalizer` fails if either `tac` or `finalizer` fails. -/
meta def finally {β} (tac : tactic α) (finalizer : tactic β) : tactic α :=
λ s, match tac s with
| (result.success r s') := (finalizer >> pure r) s'
| (result.exception msg p s') := (finalizer >> result.exception msg p) s'
end
/--
`on_exception handler tac` runs `tac` first, and then runs `handler` only if `tac` failed.
-/
meta def on_exception {β} (handler : tactic β) (tac : tactic α) : tactic α | s :=
match tac s with
| result.exception msg p s' := (handler *> result.exception msg p) s'
| ok := ok
end
/-- `decorate_error add_msg tac` prepends `add_msg` to an exception produced by `tac` -/
meta def decorate_error (add_msg : string) (tac : tactic α) : tactic α | s :=
match tac s with
| result.exception msg p s :=
let msg (_ : unit) : format := match msg with
| some msg := add_msg ++ format.line ++ msg ()
| none := add_msg
end in
result.exception msg p s
| ok := ok
end
/-- Applies tactic `t`. If it succeeds, revert the state, and return the value. If it fails,
returns the error message. -/
meta def retrieve_or_report_error {α : Type u} (t : tactic α) : tactic (α ⊕ string) :=
λ s, match t s with
| (interaction_monad.result.success a s') := result.success (sum.inl a) s
| (interaction_monad.result.exception msg' _ s') :=
result.success (sum.inr (msg'.iget ()).to_string) s
end
/-- Applies tactic `t`. If it succeeds, return the value. If it fails, returns the error message. -/
meta def try_or_report_error {α : Type u} (t : tactic α) : tactic (α ⊕ string) :=
λ s, match t s with
| (interaction_monad.result.success a s') := result.success (sum.inl a) s'
| (interaction_monad.result.exception msg' _ s') :=
result.success (sum.inr (msg'.iget ()).to_string) s
end
/-- This tactic succeeds if `t` succeeds or fails with message `msg` such that `p msg` is `tt`.
-/
meta def succeeds_or_fails_with_msg {α : Type} (t : tactic α) (p : string → bool) : tactic unit :=
do x ← retrieve_or_report_error t,
match x with
| (sum.inl _) := skip
| (sum.inr msg) := if p msg then skip else fail msg
end
add_tactic_doc
{ name := "setup_tactic_parser",
category := doc_category.cmd,
decl_names := [`tactic.setup_tactic_parser_cmd],
tags := ["parsing", "notation"] }
/-- `trace_error msg t` executes the tactic `t`. If `t` fails, traces `msg` and the failure message
of `t`. -/
meta def trace_error (msg : string) (t : tactic α) : tactic α
| s := match t s with
| (result.success r s') := result.success r s'
| (result.exception (some msg') p s') := (trace msg >> trace (msg' ()) >> result.exception
(some msg') p) s'
| (result.exception none p s') := result.exception none p s'
end
/--
``trace_if_enabled `n msg`` traces the message `msg`
only if tracing is enabled for the name `n`.
Create new names registered for tracing with `declare_trace n`.
Then use `set_option trace.n true/false` to enable or disable tracing for `n`.
-/
meta def trace_if_enabled
(n : name) {α : Type u} [has_to_tactic_format α] (msg : α) : tactic unit :=
when_tracing n (trace msg)
/--
``trace_state_if_enabled `n msg`` prints the tactic state,
preceded by the optional string `msg`,
only if tracing is enabled for the name `n`.
-/
meta def trace_state_if_enabled
(n : name) (msg : string := "") : tactic unit :=
when_tracing n ((if msg = "" then skip else trace msg) >> trace_state)
/--
This combinator is for testing purposes. It succeeds if `t` fails with message `msg`,
and fails otherwise.
-/
meta def success_if_fail_with_msg {α : Type u} (t : tactic α) (msg : string) : tactic unit :=
λ s, match t s with
| (interaction_monad.result.exception msg' _ s') :=
let expected_msg := (msg'.iget ()).to_string in
if msg = expected_msg then result.success () s
else mk_exception format!"failure messages didn't match. Expected:\n{expected_msg}" none s
| (interaction_monad.result.success a s) :=
mk_exception "success_if_fail_with_msg combinator failed, given tactic succeeded" none s
end
/--
Construct a `Try this: refine ...` or `Try this: exact ...` string which would construct `g`.
-/
meta def tactic_statement (g : expr) : tactic string :=
do g ← instantiate_mvars g,
g ← head_beta g,
r ← pp (replace_mvars g),
if g.has_meta_var
then return (sformat!"Try this: refine {r}")
else return (sformat!"Try this: exact {r}")
/-- `with_local_goals gs tac` runs `tac` on the goals `gs` and then restores the
initial goals and returns the goals `tac` ended on. -/
meta def with_local_goals {α} (gs : list expr) (tac : tactic α) : tactic (α × list expr) :=
do gs' ← get_goals,
set_goals gs,
finally (prod.mk <$> tac <*> get_goals) (set_goals gs')
/-- like `with_local_goals` but discards the resulting goals -/
meta def with_local_goals' {α} (gs : list expr) (tac : tactic α) : tactic α :=
prod.fst <$> with_local_goals gs tac
/-- Representation of a proof goal that lends itself to comparison. The
following goal:
```lean
l₀ : T,
l₁ : T
⊢ ∀ v : T, foo
```
is represented as
```
(2, ∀ l₀ l₁ v : T, foo)
```
The number 2 indicates that first the two bound variables of the
`∀` are actually local constant. Comparing two such goals with `=`
rather than `=ₐ` or `is_def_eq` tells us that proof script should
not see the difference between the two.
-/
meta def packaged_goal := ℕ × expr
/-- proof state made of multiple `goal` meant for comparing
the result of running different tactics -/
meta def proof_state := list packaged_goal
meta instance goal.inhabited : inhabited packaged_goal := ⟨(0,var 0)⟩
meta instance proof_state.inhabited : inhabited proof_state :=
(infer_instance : inhabited (list packaged_goal))
/-- create a `packaged_goal` corresponding to the current goal -/
meta def get_packaged_goal : tactic packaged_goal := do
ls ← local_context,
tgt ← target >>= instantiate_mvars,
tgt ← pis ls tgt,
pure (ls.length, tgt)
/-- `goal_of_mvar g`, with `g` a meta variable, creates a
`packaged_goal` corresponding to `g` interpretted as a proof goal -/
meta def goal_of_mvar (g : expr) : tactic packaged_goal :=
with_local_goals' [g] get_packaged_goal
/-- `get_proof_state` lists the user visible goal for each goal
of the current state and for each goal, abstracts all of the
meta variables of the other gaols.
This produces a list of goals in the form of `ℕ × expr` where
the `expr` encodes the following proof state:
```lean
2 goals
l₁ : t₁,
l₂ : t₂,
l₃ : t₃
⊢ tgt₁
⊢ tgt₂
```
as
```lean
[ (3, ∀ (mv : tgt₁) (mv : tgt₂) (l₁ : t₁) (l₂ : t₂) (l₃ : t₃), tgt₁),
(0, ∀ (mv : tgt₁) (mv : tgt₂), tgt₂) ]
```
with 2 goals, the first 2 bound variables encode the meta variable
of all the goals, the next 3 (in the first goal) and 0 (in the second goal)
are the local constants.
This representation allows us to compare goals and proof states while
ignoring information like the unique name of local constants and
the equality or difference of meta variables that encode the same goal.
-/
meta def get_proof_state : tactic proof_state :=
do gs ← get_goals,
gs.mmap $ λ g, do
⟨n,g⟩ ← goal_of_mvar g,
g ← gs.mfoldl (λ g v, do
g ← kabstract g v reducible ff,
pure $ pi `goal binder_info.default `(true) g ) g,
pure (n,g)
/--
Run `tac` in a disposable proof state and return the state.
See `proof_state`, `goal` and `get_proof_state`.
-/
meta def get_proof_state_after (tac : tactic unit) : tactic (option proof_state) :=
try_core $ retrieve $ tac >> get_proof_state
open lean interactive
/-- A type alias for `tactic format`, standing for "pretty print format". -/
meta def pformat := tactic format
/-- `mk` lifts `fmt : format` to the tactic monad (`pformat`). -/
meta def pformat.mk (fmt : format) : pformat := pure fmt
/-- an alias for `pp`. -/
meta def to_pfmt {α} [has_to_tactic_format α] (x : α) : pformat :=
pp x
meta instance pformat.has_to_tactic_format : has_to_tactic_format pformat :=
⟨ id ⟩
meta instance : has_append pformat :=
⟨ λ x y, (++) <$> x <*> y ⟩
meta instance tactic.has_to_tactic_format [has_to_tactic_format α] :
has_to_tactic_format (tactic α) :=
⟨ λ x, x >>= to_pfmt ⟩
private meta def parse_pformat : string → list char → parser pexpr
| acc [] := pure ``(to_pfmt %%(reflect acc))
| acc ('\n'::s) :=
do f ← parse_pformat "" s,
pure ``(to_pfmt %%(reflect acc) ++ pformat.mk format.line ++ %%f)
| acc ('{'::'{'::s) := parse_pformat (acc ++ "{") s
| acc ('{'::s) :=
do (e, s) ← with_input (lean.parser.pexpr 0) s.as_string,
'}'::s ← return s.to_list | fail "'}' expected",
f ← parse_pformat "" s,
pure ``(to_pfmt %%(reflect acc) ++ to_pfmt %%e ++ %%f)
| acc (c::s) := parse_pformat (acc.str c) s
/-- See `format!` in `init/meta/interactive_base.lean`.
The main differences are that `pp` is called instead of `to_fmt` and that we can use
arguments of type `tactic α` in the quotations.
Now, consider the following:
```lean
e ← to_expr ``(3 + 7),
trace format!"{e}" -- outputs `has_add.add.{0} nat nat.has_add
-- (bit1.{0} nat nat.has_one nat.has_add (has_one.one.{0} nat nat.has_one)) ...`
trace pformat!"{e}" -- outputs `3 + 7`
```
The difference is significant. And now, the following is expressible:
```lean
e ← to_expr ``(3 + 7),
trace pformat!"{e} : {infer_type e}" -- outputs `3 + 7 : ℕ`
```
See also: `trace!` and `fail!`
-/
@[user_notation]
meta def pformat_macro (_ : parse $ tk "pformat!") (s : string) : parser pexpr :=
do e ← parse_pformat "" s.to_list,
return ``(%%e : pformat)
/--
The combination of `pformat` and `fail`.
-/
@[user_notation]
meta def fail_macro (_ : parse $ tk "fail!") (s : string) : parser pexpr :=
do e ← pformat_macro () s,
pure ``((%%e : pformat) >>= fail)
/--
The combination of `pformat` and `trace`.
-/
@[user_notation]
meta def trace_macro (_ : parse $ tk "trace!") (s : string) : parser pexpr :=
do e ← pformat_macro () s,
pure ``((%%e : pformat) >>= trace)
/-- A hackish way to get the `src` directory of mathlib. -/
meta def get_mathlib_dir : tactic string :=
do e ← get_env,
s ← e.decl_olean `tactic.reset_instance_cache,
return $ s.popn_back 17
/-- Checks whether a declaration with the given name is declared in mathlib.
If you want to run this tactic many times, you should use `environment.is_prefix_of_file` instead,
since it is expensive to execute `get_mathlib_dir` many times. -/
meta def is_in_mathlib (n : name) : tactic bool :=
do ml ← get_mathlib_dir, e ← get_env, return $ e.is_prefix_of_file ml n
/--
Runs a tactic by name.
If it is a `tactic string`, return whatever string it returns.
If it is a `tactic unit`, return the name.
(This is mostly used in invoking "self-reporting tactics", e.g. by `tidy` and `hint`.)
-/
meta def name_to_tactic (n : name) : tactic string :=
do d ← get_decl n,
e ← mk_const n,
let t := d.type,
if (t =ₐ `(tactic unit)) then
(eval_expr (tactic unit) e) >>= (λ t, t >> (name.to_string <$> strip_prefix n))
else if (t =ₐ `(tactic string)) then
(eval_expr (tactic string) e) >>= (λ t, t)
else fail!
"name_to_tactic cannot take `{n} as input: its type must be `tactic string` or `tactic unit`"
/-- auxiliary function for `apply_under_n_pis` -/
private meta def apply_under_n_pis_aux (func arg : pexpr) : ℕ → ℕ → expr → pexpr
| n 0 _ :=
let vars := ((list.range n).reverse.map (@expr.var ff)),
bd := vars.foldl expr.app arg.mk_explicit in
func bd
| n (k+1) (expr.pi nm bi tp bd) := expr.pi nm bi (pexpr.of_expr tp)
(apply_under_n_pis_aux (n+1) k bd)
| n (k+1) t := apply_under_n_pis_aux n 0 t
/--
Assumes `pi_expr` is of the form `Π x1 ... xn xn+1..., _`.
Creates a pexpr of the form `Π x1 ... xn, func (arg x1 ... xn)`.
All arguments (implicit and explicit) to `arg` should be supplied. -/
meta def apply_under_n_pis (func arg : pexpr) (pi_expr : expr) (n : ℕ) : pexpr :=
apply_under_n_pis_aux func arg 0 n pi_expr
/--
Assumes `pi_expr` is of the form `Π x1 ... xn, _`.
Creates a pexpr of the form `Π x1 ... xn, func (arg x1 ... xn)`.
All arguments (implicit and explicit) to `arg` should be supplied. -/
meta def apply_under_pis (func arg : pexpr) (pi_expr : expr) : pexpr :=
apply_under_n_pis func arg pi_expr pi_expr.pi_arity
/--
If `func` is a `pexpr` representing a function that takes an argument `a`,
`get_pexpr_arg_arity_with_tgt func tgt` returns the arity of `a`.
When `tgt` is a `pi` expr, `func` is elaborated in a context
with the domain of `tgt`.
Examples:
* ```get_pexpr_arg_arity ``(ring) `(true)``` returns 0, since `ring` takes one non-function
argument.
* ```get_pexpr_arg_arity_with_tgt ``(monad) `(true)``` returns 1, since `monad` takes one argument
of type `α → α`.
* ```get_pexpr_arg_arity_with_tgt ``(module R) `(Π (R : Type), comm_ring R → true)``` returns 0
-/
meta def get_pexpr_arg_arity_with_tgt (func : pexpr) (tgt : expr) : tactic ℕ :=
lock_tactic_state $ do
mv ← mk_mvar,
solve_aux tgt $ intros >> to_expr ``(%%func %%mv),
expr.pi_arity <$> (infer_type mv >>= instantiate_mvars)
/-- `find_private_decl n none` finds a private declaration named `n` in any of the imported files.
`find_private_decl n (some m)` finds a private declaration named `n` in the same file where a
declaration named `m` can be found. -/
meta def find_private_decl (n : name) (fr : option name) : tactic name :=
do env ← get_env,
fn ← option_t.run (do
fr ← option_t.mk (return fr),
d ← monad_lift $ get_decl fr,
option_t.mk (return $ env.decl_olean d.to_name) ),
let p : string → bool :=
match fn with
| (some fn) := λ x, fn = x
| none := λ _, tt
end,
let xs := env.decl_filter_map (λ d,
do fn ← env.decl_olean d.to_name,
guard ((`_private).is_prefix_of d.to_name ∧ p fn ∧
d.to_name.update_prefix name.anonymous = n),
pure d.to_name),
match xs with
| [n] := pure n
| [] := fail "no such private found"
| _ := fail "many matches found"
end
open lean.parser interactive
/-- `import_private foo from bar` finds a private declaration `foo` in the same file as `bar`
and creates a local notation to refer to it.
`import_private foo` looks for `foo` in all imported files.
When possible, make `foo` non-private rather than using this feature.
-/
@[user_command]
meta def import_private_cmd (_ : parse $ tk "import_private") : lean.parser unit :=
do n ← ident,
fr ← optional (tk "from" *> ident),
n ← find_private_decl n fr,
c ← resolve_constant n,
d ← get_decl n,
let c := @expr.const tt c d.univ_levels,
new_n ← new_aux_decl_name,
add_decl $ declaration.defn new_n d.univ_params d.type c reducibility_hints.abbrev d.is_trusted,
let new_not := sformat!"local notation `{n.update_prefix name.anonymous}` := {new_n}",
emit_command_here $ new_not,
skip .
add_tactic_doc
{ name := "import_private",
category := doc_category.cmd,
decl_names := [`tactic.import_private_cmd],
tags := ["renaming"] }
/--
The command `mk_simp_attribute simp_name "description"` creates a simp set with name `simp_name`.
Lemmas tagged with `@[simp_name]` will be included when `simp with simp_name` is called.
`mk_simp_attribute simp_name none` will use a default description.
Appending the command with `with attr1 attr2 ...` will include all declarations tagged with
`attr1`, `attr2`, ... in the new simp set.
This command is preferred to using ``run_cmd mk_simp_attr `simp_name`` since it adds a doc string
to the attribute that is defined. If you need to create a simp set in a file where this command is
not available, you should use
```lean
run_cmd mk_simp_attr `simp_name
run_cmd add_doc_string `simp_attr.simp_name "Description of the simp set here"
```
-/
@[user_command]
meta def mk_simp_attribute_cmd (_ : parse $ tk "mk_simp_attribute") : lean.parser unit :=
do n ← ident,
d ← parser.pexpr,
d ← to_expr ``(%%d : option string),
descr ← eval_expr (option string) d,
with_list ← (tk "with" *> many ident) <|> return [],
mk_simp_attr n with_list,
add_doc_string (name.append `simp_attr n) $ descr.get_or_else $ "simp set for " ++ to_string n
add_tactic_doc
{ name := "mk_simp_attribute",
category := doc_category.cmd,
decl_names := [`tactic.mk_simp_attribute_cmd],
tags := ["simplification"] }
/--
Given a user attribute name `attr_name`, `get_user_attribute_name attr_name` returns
the name of the declaration that defines this attribute.
Fails if there is no user attribute with this name.
Example: ``get_user_attribute_name `norm_cast`` returns `` `norm_cast.norm_cast_attr`` -/
meta def get_user_attribute_name (attr_name : name) : tactic name := do
ns ← attribute.get_instances `user_attribute,
ns.mfirst (λ nm, do
d ← get_decl nm,
e ← mk_app `user_attribute.name [d.value],
attr_nm ← eval_expr name e,
guard $ attr_nm = attr_name,
return nm) <|> fail!"'{attr_name}' is not a user attribute."
/-- A tactic to set either a basic attribute or a user attribute.
If the the user attribute has a parameter, the default value will be used.
This tactic raises an error if there is no `inhabited` instance for the parameter type. -/
meta def set_attribute (attr_name : name) (c_name : name) (persistent := tt)
(prio : option nat := none) : tactic unit := do
get_decl c_name <|> fail!"unknown declaration {c_name}",
s ← try_or_report_error (set_basic_attribute attr_name c_name persistent prio),
sum.inr msg ← return s | skip,
if msg =
(format!"set_basic_attribute tactic failed, '{attr_name}' is not a basic attribute").to_string
then do
user_attr_nm ← get_user_attribute_name attr_name,
user_attr_const ← mk_const user_attr_nm,
tac ← eval_pexpr (tactic unit)
``(user_attribute.set %%user_attr_const %%c_name (default _) %%persistent) <|>
fail! ("Cannot set attribute @[{attr_name}].\n" ++
"The corresponding user attribute {user_attr_nm} " ++
"has a parameter without a default value.\n" ++
"Solution: provide an `inhabited` instance."),
tac
else fail msg
end tactic
/--
`find_defeq red m e` looks for a key in `m` that is defeq to `e` (up to transparency `red`),
and returns the value associated with this key if it exists.
Otherwise, it fails.
-/
meta def list.find_defeq (red : tactic.transparency) {v} (m : list (expr × v)) (e : expr) :
tactic (expr × v) :=
m.mfind $ λ ⟨e', val⟩, tactic.is_def_eq e e' red
|
e3aeb072578dc0c1c15d0d94bf79af55b5214416 | 4fa161becb8ce7378a709f5992a594764699e268 | /src/data/equiv/local_equiv.lean | cf85ad2bc32f1bfa177032a61f031b4322eb2ced | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | laughinggas/mathlib | e4aa4565ae34e46e834434284cb26bd9d67bc373 | 86dcd5cda7a5017c8b3c8876c89a510a19d49aad | refs/heads/master | 1,669,496,232,688 | 1,592,831,995,000 | 1,592,831,995,000 | 274,155,979 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,592,835,190,000 | 1,592,835,189,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 21,866 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import data.equiv.basic
/-!
# Local equivalences
This files defines equivalences between subsets of given types.
An element `e` of `local_equiv α β` is made of two maps `e.to_fun` and `e.inv_fun` respectively
from α to β and from β to α (just like equivs), which are inverse to each other on the subsets
`e.source` and `e.target` of respectively α and β.
They are designed in particular to define charts on manifolds.
The main functionality is `e.trans f`, which composes the two local equivalences by restricting
the source and target to the maximal set where the composition makes sense.
As for equivs, we register a coercion to functions and use it in our simp normal form: we write
`e x` and `e.symm y` instead of `e.to_fun x` and `e.inv_fun y`.
## Main definitions
`equiv.to_local_equiv`: associating a local equiv to an equiv, with source = target = univ
`local_equiv.symm` : the inverse of a local equiv
`local_equiv.trans` : the composition of two local equivs
`local_equiv.refl` : the identity local equiv
`local_equiv.of_set` : the identity on a set `s`
`eq_on_source` : equivalence relation describing the "right" notion of equality for local
equivs (see below in implementation notes)
## Implementation notes
There are at least three possible implementations of local equivalences:
* equivs on subtypes
* pairs of functions taking values in `option α` and `option β`, equal to none where the local
equivalence is not defined
* pairs of functions defined everywhere, keeping the source and target as additional data
Each of these implementations has pros and cons.
* When dealing with subtypes, one still need to define additional API for composition and
restriction of domains. Checking that one always belongs to the right subtype makes things very
tedious, and leads quickly to DTT hell (as the subtype `u ∩ v` is not the "same" as `v ∩ u`, for
instance).
* With option-valued functions, the composition is very neat (it is just the usual composition, and
the domain is restricted automatically). These are implemented in `pequiv.lean`. For manifolds,
where one wants to discuss thoroughly the smoothness of the maps, this creates however a lot of
overhead as one would need to extend all classes of smoothness to option-valued maps.
* The local_equiv version as explained above is easier to use for manifolds. The drawback is that
there is extra useless data (the values of `to_fun` and `inv_fun` outside of `source` and `target`).
In particular, the equality notion between local equivs is not "the right one", i.e., coinciding
source and target and equality there. Moreover, there are no local equivs in this sense between
an empty type and a nonempty type. Since empty types are not that useful, and since one almost never
needs to talk about equal local equivs, this is not an issue in practice.
Still, we introduce an equivalence relation `eq_on_source` that captures this right notion of
equality, and show that many properties are invariant under this equivalence relation.
-/
open function set
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*}
/-- Local equivalence between subsets `source` and `target` of α and β respectively. The (global)
maps `to_fun : α → β` and `inv_fun : β → α` map `source` to `target` and conversely, and are inverse
to each other there. The values of `to_fun` outside of `source` and of `inv_fun` outside of `target`
are irrelevant. -/
@[nolint has_inhabited_instance]
structure local_equiv (α : Type*) (β : Type*) :=
(to_fun : α → β)
(inv_fun : β → α)
(source : set α)
(target : set β)
(map_source' : ∀{x}, x ∈ source → to_fun x ∈ target)
(map_target' : ∀{x}, x ∈ target → inv_fun x ∈ source)
(left_inv' : ∀{x}, x ∈ source → inv_fun (to_fun x) = x)
(right_inv' : ∀{x}, x ∈ target → to_fun (inv_fun x) = x)
/-- Associating a local_equiv to an equiv-/
def equiv.to_local_equiv (e : equiv α β) : local_equiv α β :=
{ to_fun := e.to_fun,
inv_fun := e.inv_fun,
source := univ,
target := univ,
map_source' := λx hx, mem_univ _,
map_target' := λy hy, mem_univ _,
left_inv' := λx hx, e.left_inv x,
right_inv' := λx hx, e.right_inv x }
namespace local_equiv
variables (e : local_equiv α β) (e' : local_equiv β γ)
/-- The inverse of a local equiv -/
protected def symm : local_equiv β α :=
{ to_fun := e.inv_fun,
inv_fun := e.to_fun,
source := e.target,
target := e.source,
map_source' := e.map_target',
map_target' := e.map_source',
left_inv' := e.right_inv',
right_inv' := e.left_inv' }
instance : has_coe_to_fun (local_equiv α β) := ⟨_, local_equiv.to_fun⟩
@[simp] theorem coe_mk (f : α → β) (g s t ml mr il ir) :
(local_equiv.mk f g s t ml mr il ir : α → β) = f := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_symm_mk (f : α → β) (g s t ml mr il ir) :
((local_equiv.mk f g s t ml mr il ir).symm : β → α) = g := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_fun_as_coe : e.to_fun = e := rfl
@[simp] lemma inv_fun_as_coe : e.inv_fun = e.symm := rfl
@[simp] lemma map_source {x : α} (h : x ∈ e.source) : e x ∈ e.target :=
e.map_source' h
protected lemma maps_to : maps_to e e.source e.target := λ _, e.map_source
@[simp] lemma map_target {x : β} (h : x ∈ e.target) : e.symm x ∈ e.source :=
e.map_target' h
lemma symm_maps_to : maps_to e.symm e.target e.source := e.symm.maps_to
@[simp] lemma left_inv {x : α} (h : x ∈ e.source) : e.symm (e x) = x :=
e.left_inv' h
protected lemma left_inv_on : left_inv_on e.symm e e.source := λ _, e.left_inv
@[simp] lemma right_inv {x : β} (h : x ∈ e.target) : e (e.symm x) = x :=
e.right_inv' h
protected lemma right_inv_on : right_inv_on e.symm e e.target := λ _, e.right_inv
/-- Associating to a local_equiv an equiv between the source and the target -/
protected def to_equiv : equiv (e.source) (e.target) :=
{ to_fun := λ x, ⟨e x, e.map_source x.mem⟩,
inv_fun := λ y, ⟨e.symm y, e.map_target y.mem⟩,
left_inv := λ⟨x, hx⟩, subtype.eq $ e.left_inv hx,
right_inv := λ⟨y, hy⟩, subtype.eq $ e.right_inv hy }
@[simp] lemma symm_source : e.symm.source = e.target := rfl
@[simp] lemma symm_target : e.symm.target = e.source := rfl
@[simp] lemma symm_symm : e.symm.symm = e := by { cases e, refl }
/-- A local equiv induces a bijection between its source and target -/
lemma bij_on_source : bij_on e e.source e.target :=
inv_on.bij_on ⟨e.left_inv_on, e.right_inv_on⟩ e.maps_to e.symm_maps_to
lemma image_eq_target_inter_inv_preimage {s : set α} (h : s ⊆ e.source) :
e '' s = e.target ∩ e.symm ⁻¹' s :=
begin
refine subset.antisymm (λx hx, _) (λx hx, _),
{ rcases (mem_image _ _ _).1 hx with ⟨y, ys, hy⟩,
rw ← hy,
split,
{ apply e.map_source,
exact h ys },
{ rwa [mem_preimage, e.left_inv (h ys)] } },
{ rw ← e.right_inv hx.1,
exact mem_image_of_mem _ hx.2 }
end
lemma inv_image_eq_source_inter_preimage {s : set β} (h : s ⊆ e.target) :
e.symm '' s = e.source ∩ e ⁻¹' s :=
e.symm.image_eq_target_inter_inv_preimage h
lemma source_inter_preimage_inv_preimage (s : set α) :
e.source ∩ e ⁻¹' (e.symm ⁻¹' s) = e.source ∩ s :=
begin
ext, split,
{ rintros ⟨hx, xs⟩,
simp only [mem_preimage, hx, e.left_inv, mem_preimage] at xs,
exact ⟨hx, xs⟩ },
{ rintros ⟨hx, xs⟩,
simp [hx, xs] }
end
lemma target_inter_inv_preimage_preimage (s : set β) :
e.target ∩ e.symm ⁻¹' (e ⁻¹' s) = e.target ∩ s :=
e.symm.source_inter_preimage_inv_preimage _
lemma image_source_eq_target : e '' e.source = e.target :=
e.bij_on_source.image_eq
lemma source_subset_preimage_target : e.source ⊆ e ⁻¹' e.target :=
λx hx, e.map_source hx
lemma inv_image_target_eq_source : e.symm '' e.target = e.source :=
e.symm.bij_on_source.image_eq
lemma target_subset_preimage_source : e.target ⊆ e.symm ⁻¹' e.source :=
λx hx, e.map_target hx
/-- Two local equivs that have the same `source`, same `to_fun` and same `inv_fun`, coincide. -/
@[ext]
protected lemma ext {e e' : local_equiv α β} (h : ∀x, e x = e' x)
(hsymm : ∀x, e.symm x = e'.symm x) (hs : e.source = e'.source) : e = e' :=
begin
have A : (e : α → β) = e', by { ext x, exact h x },
have B : (e.symm : β → α) = e'.symm, by { ext x, exact hsymm x },
have I : e '' e.source = e.target := e.image_source_eq_target,
have I' : e' '' e'.source = e'.target := e'.image_source_eq_target,
rw [A, hs, I'] at I,
cases e; cases e',
simp * at *
end
/-- Restricting a local equivalence to e.source ∩ s -/
protected def restr (s : set α) : local_equiv α β :=
{ to_fun := e,
inv_fun := e.symm,
source := e.source ∩ s,
target := e.target ∩ e.symm⁻¹' s,
map_source' := λx hx, begin
apply mem_inter,
{ apply e.map_source,
exact hx.1 },
{ rw [mem_preimage, e.left_inv],
exact hx.2,
exact hx.1 },
end,
map_target' := λy hy, begin
apply mem_inter,
{ apply e.map_target,
exact hy.1 },
{ exact hy.2 },
end,
left_inv' := λx hx, e.left_inv hx.1,
right_inv' := λy hy, e.right_inv hy.1 }
@[simp] lemma restr_coe (s : set α) : (e.restr s : α → β) = e := rfl
@[simp] lemma restr_coe_symm (s : set α) : ((e.restr s).symm : β → α) = e.symm := rfl
@[simp] lemma restr_source (s : set α) : (e.restr s).source = e.source ∩ s := rfl
@[simp] lemma restr_target (s : set α) : (e.restr s).target = e.target ∩ e.symm ⁻¹' s := rfl
lemma restr_eq_of_source_subset {e : local_equiv α β} {s : set α} (h : e.source ⊆ s) :
e.restr s = e :=
local_equiv.ext (λ_, rfl) (λ_, rfl) (by simp [inter_eq_self_of_subset_left h])
@[simp] lemma restr_univ {e : local_equiv α β} : e.restr univ = e :=
restr_eq_of_source_subset (subset_univ _)
/-- The identity local equiv -/
protected def refl (α : Type*) : local_equiv α α := (equiv.refl α).to_local_equiv
@[simp] lemma refl_source : (local_equiv.refl α).source = univ := rfl
@[simp] lemma refl_target : (local_equiv.refl α).target = univ := rfl
@[simp] lemma refl_coe : (local_equiv.refl α : α → α) = id := rfl
@[simp] lemma refl_symm : (local_equiv.refl α).symm = local_equiv.refl α := rfl
@[simp] lemma refl_restr_source (s : set α) : ((local_equiv.refl α).restr s).source = s :=
by simp
@[simp] lemma refl_restr_target (s : set α) : ((local_equiv.refl α).restr s).target = s :=
by { change univ ∩ id⁻¹' s = s, simp }
/-- The identity local equiv on a set `s` -/
def of_set (s : set α) : local_equiv α α :=
{ to_fun := id,
inv_fun := id,
source := s,
target := s,
map_source' := λx hx, hx,
map_target' := λx hx, hx,
left_inv' := λx hx, rfl,
right_inv' := λx hx, rfl }
@[simp] lemma of_set_source (s : set α) : (local_equiv.of_set s).source = s := rfl
@[simp] lemma of_set_target (s : set α) : (local_equiv.of_set s).target = s := rfl
@[simp] lemma of_set_coe (s : set α) : (local_equiv.of_set s : α → α) = id := rfl
@[simp] lemma of_set_symm (s : set α) : (local_equiv.of_set s).symm = local_equiv.of_set s := rfl
/-- Composing two local equivs if the target of the first coincides with the source of the
second. -/
protected def trans' (e' : local_equiv β γ) (h : e.target = e'.source) :
local_equiv α γ :=
{ to_fun := e' ∘ e,
inv_fun := e.symm ∘ e'.symm,
source := e.source,
target := e'.target,
map_source' := λx hx, by simp [h.symm, hx],
map_target' := λy hy, by simp [h, hy],
left_inv' := λx hx, by simp [hx, h.symm],
right_inv' := λy hy, by simp [hy, h] }
/-- Composing two local equivs, by restricting to the maximal domain where their composition
is well defined. -/
protected def trans : local_equiv α γ :=
local_equiv.trans' (e.symm.restr (e'.source)).symm (e'.restr (e.target)) (inter_comm _ _)
@[simp] lemma coe_trans : (e.trans e' : α → γ) = e' ∘ e := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_trans_symm : ((e.trans e').symm : γ → α) = e.symm ∘ e'.symm := rfl
lemma trans_symm_eq_symm_trans_symm : (e.trans e').symm = e'.symm.trans e.symm :=
by cases e; cases e'; refl
/- This could be considered as a simp lemma, but there are many situations where it makes something
simple into something more complicated. -/
lemma trans_source : (e.trans e').source = e.source ∩ e ⁻¹' e'.source := rfl
lemma trans_source' : (e.trans e').source = e.source ∩ e ⁻¹' (e.target ∩ e'.source) :=
begin
symmetry, calc
e.source ∩ e ⁻¹' (e.target ∩ e'.source) =
(e.source ∩ e ⁻¹' (e.target)) ∩ e ⁻¹' (e'.source) :
by rw [preimage_inter, inter_assoc]
... = e.source ∩ e ⁻¹' (e'.source) :
by { congr' 1, apply inter_eq_self_of_subset_left e.source_subset_preimage_target }
... = (e.trans e').source : rfl
end
lemma trans_source'' : (e.trans e').source = e.symm '' (e.target ∩ e'.source) :=
begin
rw [e.trans_source', e.inv_image_eq_source_inter_preimage, inter_comm],
exact inter_subset_left _ _,
end
lemma image_trans_source : e '' (e.trans e').source = e.target ∩ e'.source :=
image_source_eq_target (local_equiv.symm (local_equiv.restr (local_equiv.symm e) (e'.source)))
lemma trans_target : (e.trans e').target = e'.target ∩ e'.symm ⁻¹' e.target := rfl
lemma trans_target' : (e.trans e').target = e'.target ∩ e'.symm ⁻¹' (e'.source ∩ e.target) :=
trans_source' e'.symm e.symm
lemma trans_target'' : (e.trans e').target = e' '' (e'.source ∩ e.target) :=
trans_source'' e'.symm e.symm
lemma inv_image_trans_target : e'.symm '' (e.trans e').target = e'.source ∩ e.target :=
image_trans_source e'.symm e.symm
lemma trans_assoc (e'' : local_equiv γ δ) : (e.trans e').trans e'' = e.trans (e'.trans e'') :=
local_equiv.ext (λx, rfl) (λx, rfl) (by simp [trans_source, @preimage_comp α β γ, inter_assoc])
@[simp] lemma trans_refl : e.trans (local_equiv.refl β) = e :=
local_equiv.ext (λx, rfl) (λx, rfl) (by simp [trans_source])
@[simp] lemma refl_trans : (local_equiv.refl α).trans e = e :=
local_equiv.ext (λx, rfl) (λx, rfl) (by simp [trans_source, preimage_id])
lemma trans_refl_restr (s : set β) :
e.trans ((local_equiv.refl β).restr s) = e.restr (e ⁻¹' s) :=
local_equiv.ext (λx, rfl) (λx, rfl) (by simp [trans_source])
lemma trans_refl_restr' (s : set β) :
e.trans ((local_equiv.refl β).restr s) = e.restr (e.source ∩ e ⁻¹' s) :=
local_equiv.ext (λx, rfl) (λx, rfl) $ by { simp [trans_source], rw [← inter_assoc, inter_self] }
lemma restr_trans (s : set α) :
(e.restr s).trans e' = (e.trans e').restr s :=
local_equiv.ext (λx, rfl) (λx, rfl) $ by { simp [trans_source, inter_comm], rwa inter_assoc }
/-- `eq_on_source e e'` means that `e` and `e'` have the same source, and coincide there. Then `e`
and `e'` should really be considered the same local equiv. -/
def eq_on_source (e e' : local_equiv α β) : Prop :=
e.source = e'.source ∧ (e.source.eq_on e e')
/-- `eq_on_source` is an equivalence relation -/
instance eq_on_source_setoid : setoid (local_equiv α β) :=
{ r := eq_on_source,
iseqv := ⟨
λe, by simp [eq_on_source],
λe e' h, by { simp [eq_on_source, h.1.symm], exact λx hx, (h.2 hx).symm },
λe e' e'' h h', ⟨by rwa [← h'.1, ← h.1], λx hx, by { rw [← h'.2, h.2 hx], rwa ← h.1 }⟩⟩ }
lemma eq_on_source_refl : e ≈ e := setoid.refl _
/-- Two equivalent local equivs have the same source -/
lemma eq_on_source.source_eq {e e' : local_equiv α β} (h : e ≈ e') : e.source = e'.source :=
h.1
/-- Two equivalent local equivs coincide on the source -/
lemma eq_on_source.eq_on {e e' : local_equiv α β} (h : e ≈ e') : e.source.eq_on e e' :=
h.2
/-- Two equivalent local equivs have the same target -/
lemma eq_on_source.target_eq {e e' : local_equiv α β} (h : e ≈ e') : e.target = e'.target :=
by simp only [← image_source_eq_target, ← h.source_eq, h.2.image_eq]
/-- If two local equivs are equivalent, so are their inverses. -/
lemma eq_on_source.symm' {e e' : local_equiv α β} (h : e ≈ e') : e.symm ≈ e'.symm :=
begin
refine ⟨h.target_eq, eq_on_of_left_inv_on_of_right_inv_on e.left_inv_on _ _⟩;
simp only [symm_source, h.target_eq, h.source_eq, e'.symm_maps_to],
exact e'.right_inv_on.congr_right e'.symm_maps_to (h.source_eq ▸ h.eq_on.symm),
end
/-- Two equivalent local equivs have coinciding inverses on the target -/
lemma eq_on_source.symm_eq_on {e e' : local_equiv α β} (h : e ≈ e') :
eq_on e.symm e'.symm e.target :=
h.symm'.eq_on
/-- Composition of local equivs respects equivalence -/
lemma eq_on_source.trans' {e e' : local_equiv α β} {f f' : local_equiv β γ}
(he : e ≈ e') (hf : f ≈ f') : e.trans f ≈ e'.trans f' :=
begin
split,
{ rw [trans_source'', trans_source'', ← he.target_eq, ← hf.1],
exact (he.symm'.eq_on.mono $ inter_subset_left _ _).image_eq },
{ assume x hx,
rw trans_source at hx,
simp [(he.2 hx.1).symm, hf.2 hx.2] }
end
/-- Restriction of local equivs respects equivalence -/
lemma eq_on_source.restr {e e' : local_equiv α β} (he : e ≈ e') (s : set α) :
e.restr s ≈ e'.restr s :=
begin
split,
{ simp [he.1] },
{ assume x hx,
simp only [mem_inter_eq, restr_source] at hx,
exact he.2 hx.1 }
end
/-- Preimages are respected by equivalence -/
lemma eq_on_source.source_inter_preimage_eq {e e' : local_equiv α β} (he : e ≈ e') (s : set β) :
e.source ∩ e ⁻¹' s = e'.source ∩ e' ⁻¹' s :=
begin
ext x,
simp only [mem_inter_eq, mem_preimage],
split,
{ assume hx,
rwa [← he.2 hx.1, ← he.source_eq] },
{ assume hx,
rwa [← (setoid.symm he).2 hx.1, he.source_eq] }
end
/-- Composition of a local equiv and its inverse is equivalent to the restriction of the identity
to the source -/
lemma trans_self_symm :
e.trans e.symm ≈ local_equiv.of_set e.source :=
begin
have A : (e.trans e.symm).source = e.source,
by simp [trans_source, inter_eq_self_of_subset_left (source_subset_preimage_target _)],
refine ⟨by simp [A], λx hx, _⟩,
rw A at hx,
simp [hx]
end
/-- Composition of the inverse of a local equiv and this local equiv is equivalent to the
restriction of the identity to the target -/
lemma trans_symm_self :
e.symm.trans e ≈ local_equiv.of_set e.target :=
trans_self_symm (e.symm)
/-- Two equivalent local equivs are equal when the source and target are univ -/
lemma eq_of_eq_on_source_univ (e e' : local_equiv α β) (h : e ≈ e')
(s : e.source = univ) (t : e.target = univ) : e = e' :=
begin
apply local_equiv.ext (λx, _) (λx, _) h.1,
{ apply h.2,
rw s,
exact mem_univ _ },
{ apply h.symm'.2,
rw [symm_source, t],
exact mem_univ _ }
end
section prod
/-- The product of two local equivs, as a local equiv on the product. -/
def prod (e : local_equiv α β) (e' : local_equiv γ δ) : local_equiv (α × γ) (β × δ) :=
{ source := set.prod e.source e'.source,
target := set.prod e.target e'.target,
to_fun := λp, (e p.1, e' p.2),
inv_fun := λp, (e.symm p.1, e'.symm p.2),
map_source' := λp hp, by { simp at hp, simp [hp] },
map_target' := λp hp, by { simp at hp, simp [map_target, hp] },
left_inv' := λp hp, by { simp at hp, simp [hp] },
right_inv' := λp hp, by { simp at hp, simp [hp] } }
@[simp] lemma prod_source (e : local_equiv α β) (e' : local_equiv γ δ) :
(e.prod e').source = set.prod e.source e'.source := rfl
@[simp] lemma prod_target (e : local_equiv α β) (e' : local_equiv γ δ) :
(e.prod e').target = set.prod e.target e'.target := rfl
@[simp] lemma prod_coe (e : local_equiv α β) (e' : local_equiv γ δ) :
((e.prod e') : α × γ → β × δ) = (λp, (e p.1, e' p.2)) := rfl
@[simp] lemma prod_coe_symm (e : local_equiv α β) (e' : local_equiv γ δ) :
((e.prod e').symm : β × δ → α × γ) = (λp, (e.symm p.1, e'.symm p.2)) := rfl
end prod
end local_equiv
namespace set
-- All arguments are explicit to avoid missing information in the pretty printer output
/-- A bijection between two sets `s : set α` and `t : set β` provides a local equivalence
between `α` and `β`. -/
@[simps] noncomputable def bij_on.to_local_equiv [nonempty α] (f : α → β) (s : set α) (t : set β)
(hf : bij_on f s t) :
local_equiv α β :=
{ to_fun := f,
inv_fun := inv_fun_on f s,
source := s,
target := t,
map_source' := hf.maps_to,
map_target' := hf.surj_on.maps_to_inv_fun_on,
left_inv' := hf.inv_on_inv_fun_on.1,
right_inv' := hf.inv_on_inv_fun_on.2 }
/-- A map injective on a subset of its domain provides a local equivalence. -/
@[simp] noncomputable def inj_on.to_local_equiv [nonempty α] (f : α → β) (s : set α)
(hf : inj_on f s) :
local_equiv α β :=
hf.bij_on_image.to_local_equiv f s (f '' s)
end set
namespace equiv
/- equivs give rise to local_equiv. We set up simp lemmas to reduce most properties of the local
equiv to that of the equiv. -/
variables (e : equiv α β) (e' : equiv β γ)
@[simp] lemma to_local_equiv_coe : (e.to_local_equiv : α → β) = e := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_local_equiv_symm_coe : (e.to_local_equiv.symm : β → α) = e.symm := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_local_equiv_source : e.to_local_equiv.source = univ := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_local_equiv_target : e.to_local_equiv.target = univ := rfl
@[simp] lemma refl_to_local_equiv : (equiv.refl α).to_local_equiv = local_equiv.refl α := rfl
@[simp] lemma symm_to_local_equiv : e.symm.to_local_equiv = e.to_local_equiv.symm := rfl
@[simp] lemma trans_to_local_equiv :
(e.trans e').to_local_equiv = e.to_local_equiv.trans e'.to_local_equiv :=
local_equiv.ext (λx, rfl) (λx, rfl) (by simp [local_equiv.trans_source, equiv.to_local_equiv])
end equiv
|
87d2087b9d6a5e9c4323dce4b86d20640e0f1c00 | 492a7e27d49633a89f7ce6e1e28f676b062fcbc9 | /src/monoidal_categories_reboot/monoidal_opposite.lean | ae63ebe0df3ec845e4264921f553b59290544cc6 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | semorrison/monoidal-categories-reboot | 9edba30277de48a234b63813cf85b171772ce36f | 48b5f1d535daba4e591672042a298ac36be2e6dd | refs/heads/master | 1,642,472,396,149 | 1,560,587,477,000 | 1,560,587,477,000 | 156,465,626 | 0 | 1 | null | 1,541,549,278,000 | 1,541,549,278,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,146 | lean | -- Copyright (c) 2018 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
-- Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-- Authors: Scott Morrison
import .monoidal_functor_attributes
open category_theory
namespace category_theory.monoidal
universes u₁ v₁ u₂ v₂
def mop (C : Sort u₁) : Sort u₁ := C
def unmop {C : Sort u₁} (X : mop C) : C := X
variables {C : Type u₁} [𝒞 : monoidal_category.{v₁} C]
include 𝒞
instance underlying_category_monoidal_opposite : category.{v₁} (mop C) := 𝒞.to_category
-- WIP
-- instance monoidal_opposite : monoidal_category.{v₁} (mop C) :=
-- { tensor_obj := λ X Y, @monoidal_category.tensor_obj C _ Y X,
-- tensor_hom := λ (X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : mop C) (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂), @monoidal_category.tensor_hom C _ _ _ _ _ g f,
-- tensor_unit := @monoidal_category.tensor_unit C _,
-- associator := λ X Y Z, (@monoidal_category.associator _ _ (unmop X) (unmop Y) (unmop Z)).symm,
-- left_unitor := λ X, (@monoidal_category.right_unitor _),
-- right_unitor := λ X, (@monoidal_category.left_unitor _) }
end category_theory.monoidal
|
ea4e9173090598441450be5c3fabadf5e04a9190 | 957a80ea22c5abb4f4670b250d55534d9db99108 | /tests/lean/run/monad_univ_lift.lean | 012f22a8d7dd803ec04b707358ae500a15d28dc9 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | GaloisInc/lean | aa1e64d604051e602fcf4610061314b9a37ab8cd | f1ec117a24459b59c6ff9e56a1d09d9e9e60a6c0 | refs/heads/master | 1,592,202,909,807 | 1,504,624,387,000 | 1,504,624,387,000 | 75,319,626 | 2 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,539,290,164,000 | 1,480,616,104,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 436 | lean | universe variables u v
def M : Type u → Type v :=
sorry
instance : monad M :=
sorry
def act1 : M unit :=
return ()
def act2 : M (Σ (A : Type), A) :=
return ⟨nat, 0⟩
def {t s} up {A : Type s} (a : M A) : M (ulift.{t} A) :=
sorry
def {t s} down {A : Type s} (a : M (ulift.{t} A)) : M A :=
sorry
prefix `↑`:10 := up.{1}
prefix `↓`:10 := down.{1}
def ex : M unit :=
↓do
↑act1,
act2,
↑act1,
act2,
↑act1
|
3d547f5da2a7c19cd201e370d81a021f23ffaeff | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/category_theory/elements_auto.lean | 67fc078d6f9617c5f9ac441e5870abc18107591b | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,221 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.category_theory.comma
import Mathlib.category_theory.groupoid
import Mathlib.category_theory.punit
import Mathlib.PostPort
universes w v u
namespace Mathlib
/-!
# The category of elements
This file defines the category of elements, also known as (a special case of) the Grothendieck construction.
Given a functor `F : C ⥤ Type`, an object of `F.elements` is a pair `(X : C, x : F.obj X)`.
A morphism `(X, x) ⟶ (Y, y)` is a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y` in `C`, so `F.map f` takes `x` to `y`.
## Implementation notes
This construction is equivalent to a special case of a comma construction, so this is mostly just
a more convenient API. We prove the equivalence in `category_theory.category_of_elements.comma_equivalence`.
## References
* [Emily Riehl, *Category Theory in Context*, Section 2.4][riehl2017]
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category_of_elements>
* <https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/category+of+elements>
## Tags
category of elements, Grothendieck construction, comma category
-/
namespace category_theory
/--
The type of objects for the category of elements of a functor `F : C ⥤ Type`
is a pair `(X : C, x : F.obj X)`.
-/
def functor.elements {C : Type u} [category C] (F : C ⥤ Type w) :=
sigma fun (c : C) => functor.obj F c
/-- The category structure on `F.elements`, for `F : C ⥤ Type`.
A morphism `(X, x) ⟶ (Y, y)` is a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y` in `C`, so `F.map f` takes `x` to `y`.
-/
protected instance category_of_elements {C : Type u} [category C] (F : C ⥤ Type w) :
category (functor.elements F) :=
category.mk
namespace category_of_elements
theorem ext {C : Type u} [category C] (F : C ⥤ Type w) {x : functor.elements F}
{y : functor.elements F} (f : x ⟶ y) (g : x ⟶ y) (w : subtype.val f = subtype.val g) : f = g :=
subtype.ext_val w
@[simp] theorem comp_val {C : Type u} [category C] {F : C ⥤ Type w} {p : functor.elements F}
{q : functor.elements F} {r : functor.elements F} {f : p ⟶ q} {g : q ⟶ r} :
subtype.val (f ≫ g) = subtype.val f ≫ subtype.val g :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem id_val {C : Type u} [category C] {F : C ⥤ Type w} {p : functor.elements F} :
subtype.val 𝟙 = 𝟙 :=
rfl
end category_of_elements
protected instance groupoid_of_elements {G : Type u} [groupoid G] (F : G ⥤ Type w) :
groupoid (functor.elements F) :=
groupoid.mk
fun (p q : functor.elements F) (f : p ⟶ q) => { val := inv (subtype.val f), property := sorry }
namespace category_of_elements
/-- The functor out of the category of elements which forgets the element. -/
@[simp] theorem π_map {C : Type u} [category C] (F : C ⥤ Type w) (X : functor.elements F)
(Y : functor.elements F) (f : X ⟶ Y) : functor.map (π F) f = subtype.val f :=
Eq.refl (functor.map (π F) f)
/--
A natural transformation between functors induces a functor between the categories of elements.
-/
@[simp] theorem map_obj_fst {C : Type u} [category C] {F₁ : C ⥤ Type w} {F₂ : C ⥤ Type w}
(α : F₁ ⟶ F₂) (t : functor.elements F₁) : sigma.fst (functor.obj (map α) t) = sigma.fst t :=
Eq.refl (sigma.fst (functor.obj (map α) t))
@[simp] theorem map_π {C : Type u} [category C] {F₁ : C ⥤ Type w} {F₂ : C ⥤ Type w} (α : F₁ ⟶ F₂) :
map α ⋙ π F₂ = π F₁ :=
rfl
/-- The forward direction of the equivalence `F.elements ≅ (*, F)`. -/
def to_comma {C : Type u} [category C] (F : C ⥤ Type w) :
functor.elements F ⥤ comma (functor.from_punit PUnit) F :=
functor.mk
(fun (X : functor.elements F) =>
comma.mk fun (_x : functor.obj (functor.from_punit PUnit) PUnit.unit) => sigma.snd X)
fun (X Y : functor.elements F) (f : X ⟶ Y) => comma_morphism.mk
@[simp] theorem to_comma_obj {C : Type u} [category C] (F : C ⥤ Type w) (X : functor.elements F) :
functor.obj (to_comma F) X =
comma.mk fun (_x : functor.obj (functor.from_punit PUnit) PUnit.unit) => sigma.snd X :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem to_comma_map {C : Type u} [category C] (F : C ⥤ Type w) {X : functor.elements F}
{Y : functor.elements F} (f : X ⟶ Y) : functor.map (to_comma F) f = comma_morphism.mk :=
rfl
/-- The reverse direction of the equivalence `F.elements ≅ (*, F)`. -/
def from_comma {C : Type u} [category C] (F : C ⥤ Type w) :
comma (functor.from_punit PUnit) F ⥤ functor.elements F :=
functor.mk
(fun (X : comma (functor.from_punit PUnit) F) =>
sigma.mk (comma.right X) (comma.hom X PUnit.unit))
fun (X Y : comma (functor.from_punit PUnit) F) (f : X ⟶ Y) =>
{ val := comma_morphism.right f, property := sorry }
@[simp] theorem from_comma_obj {C : Type u} [category C] (F : C ⥤ Type w)
(X : comma (functor.from_punit PUnit) F) :
functor.obj (from_comma F) X = sigma.mk (comma.right X) (comma.hom X PUnit.unit) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem from_comma_map {C : Type u} [category C] (F : C ⥤ Type w)
{X : comma (functor.from_punit PUnit) F} {Y : comma (functor.from_punit PUnit) F} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
functor.map (from_comma F) f =
{ val := comma_morphism.right f,
property := congr_fun (Eq.symm (comma_morphism.w' f)) PUnit.unit } :=
rfl
/-- The equivalence between the category of elements `F.elements`
and the comma category `(*, F)`. -/
def comma_equivalence {C : Type u} [category C] (F : C ⥤ Type w) :
functor.elements F ≌ comma (functor.from_punit PUnit) F :=
equivalence.mk (to_comma F) (from_comma F)
(nat_iso.of_components (fun (X : functor.elements F) => eq_to_iso sorry) sorry)
(nat_iso.of_components
(fun (X : comma (functor.from_punit PUnit) F) => iso.mk comma_morphism.mk comma_morphism.mk)
sorry)
@[simp] theorem comma_equivalence_functor {C : Type u} [category C] (F : C ⥤ Type w) :
equivalence.functor (comma_equivalence F) = to_comma F :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem comma_equivalence_inverse {C : Type u} [category C] (F : C ⥤ Type w) :
equivalence.inverse (comma_equivalence F) = from_comma F :=
rfl
end Mathlib |
26644cd2b0772d00ca37de08066d0315145493e7 | 947fa6c38e48771ae886239b4edce6db6e18d0fb | /src/analysis/box_integral/box/basic.lean | 463059270a838c2f59ea581e68809651484b158b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ramonfmir/mathlib | c5dc8b33155473fab97c38bd3aa6723dc289beaa | 14c52e990c17f5a00c0cc9e09847af16fabbed25 | refs/heads/master | 1,661,979,343,526 | 1,660,830,384,000 | 1,660,830,384,000 | 182,072,989 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,555,585,876,000 | 1,555,585,876,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 17,896 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import data.set.intervals.monotone
import topology.algebra.order.monotone_convergence
import topology.metric_space.basic
/-!
# Rectangular boxes in `ℝⁿ`
In this file we define rectangular boxes in `ℝⁿ`. As usual, we represent `ℝⁿ` as the type of
functions `ι → ℝ` (usually `ι = fin n` for some `n`). When we need to interpret a box `[l, u]` as a
set, we use the product `{x | ∀ i, l i < x i ∧ x i ≤ u i}` of half-open intervals `(l i, u i]`. We
exclude `l i` because this way boxes of a partition are disjoint as sets in `ℝⁿ`.
Currently, the only use cases for these constructions are the definitions of Riemann-style integrals
(Riemann, Henstock-Kurzweil, McShane).
## Main definitions
We use the same structure `box_integral.box` both for ambient boxes and for elements of a partition.
Each box is stored as two points `lower upper : ι → ℝ` and a proof of `∀ i, lower i < upper i`. We
define instances `has_mem (ι → ℝ) (box ι)` and `has_coe_t (box ι) (set $ ι → ℝ)` so that each box is
interpreted as the set `{x | ∀ i, x i ∈ set.Ioc (I.lower i) (I.upper i)}`. This way boxes of a
partition are pairwise disjoint and their union is exactly the original box.
We require boxes to be nonempty, because this way coercion to sets is injective. The empty box can
be represented as `⊥ : with_bot (box_integral.box ι)`.
We define the following operations on boxes:
* coercion to `set (ι → ℝ)` and `has_mem (ι → ℝ) (box_integral.box ι)` as described above;
* `partial_order` and `semilattice_sup` instances such that `I ≤ J` is equivalent to
`(I : set (ι → ℝ)) ⊆ J`;
* `lattice` instances on `with_bot (box_integral.box ι)`;
* `box_integral.box.Icc`: the closed box `set.Icc I.lower I.upper`; defined as a bundled monotone
map from `box ι` to `set (ι → ℝ)`;
* `box_integral.box.face I i : box (fin n)`: a hyperface of `I : box_integral.box (fin (n + 1))`;
* `box_integral.box.distortion`: the maximal ratio of two lengths of edges of a box; defined as the
supremum of `nndist I.lower I.upper / nndist (I.lower i) (I.upper i)`.
We also provide a convenience constructor `box_integral.box.mk' (l u : ι → ℝ) : with_bot (box ι)`
that returns the box `⟨l, u, _⟩` if it is nonempty and `⊥` otherwise.
## Tags
rectangular box
-/
open set function metric filter
noncomputable theory
open_locale nnreal classical topological_space
namespace box_integral
variables {ι : Type*}
/-!
### Rectangular box: definition and partial order
-/
/-- A nontrivial rectangular box in `ι → ℝ` with corners `lower` and `upper`. Repesents the product
of half-open intervals `(lower i, upper i]`. -/
structure box (ι : Type*) :=
(lower upper : ι → ℝ)
(lower_lt_upper : ∀ i, lower i < upper i)
attribute [simp] box.lower_lt_upper
namespace box
variables (I J : box ι) {x y : ι → ℝ}
instance : inhabited (box ι) := ⟨⟨0, 1, λ i, zero_lt_one⟩⟩
lemma lower_le_upper : I.lower ≤ I.upper := λ i, (I.lower_lt_upper i).le
lemma lower_ne_upper (i) : I.lower i ≠ I.upper i := (I.lower_lt_upper i).ne
instance : has_mem (ι → ℝ) (box ι) := ⟨λ x I, ∀ i, x i ∈ Ioc (I.lower i) (I.upper i)⟩
instance : has_coe_t (box ι) (set $ ι → ℝ) := ⟨λ I, {x | x ∈ I}⟩
@[simp] lemma mem_mk {l u x : ι → ℝ} {H} : x ∈ mk l u H ↔ ∀ i, x i ∈ Ioc (l i) (u i) := iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma mem_coe : x ∈ (I : set (ι → ℝ)) ↔ x ∈ I := iff.rfl
lemma mem_def : x ∈ I ↔ ∀ i, x i ∈ Ioc (I.lower i) (I.upper i) := iff.rfl
lemma mem_univ_Ioc {I : box ι} : x ∈ pi univ (λ i, Ioc (I.lower i) (I.upper i)) ↔ x ∈ I :=
mem_univ_pi
lemma coe_eq_pi : (I : set (ι → ℝ)) = pi univ (λ i, Ioc (I.lower i) (I.upper i)) :=
set.ext $ λ x, mem_univ_Ioc.symm
@[simp] lemma upper_mem : I.upper ∈ I := λ i, right_mem_Ioc.2 $ I.lower_lt_upper i
lemma exists_mem : ∃ x, x ∈ I := ⟨_, I.upper_mem⟩
lemma nonempty_coe : set.nonempty (I : set (ι → ℝ)) := I.exists_mem
@[simp] lemma coe_ne_empty : (I : set (ι → ℝ)) ≠ ∅ := I.nonempty_coe.ne_empty
@[simp] lemma empty_ne_coe : ∅ ≠ (I : set (ι → ℝ)) := I.coe_ne_empty.symm
instance : has_le (box ι) := ⟨λ I J, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ I → x ∈ J⟩
lemma le_def : I ≤ J ↔ ∀ x ∈ I, x ∈ J := iff.rfl
lemma le_tfae :
tfae [I ≤ J,
(I : set (ι → ℝ)) ⊆ J,
Icc I.lower I.upper ⊆ Icc J.lower J.upper,
J.lower ≤ I.lower ∧ I.upper ≤ J.upper] :=
begin
tfae_have : 1 ↔ 2, from iff.rfl,
tfae_have : 2 → 3,
{ intro h,
simpa [coe_eq_pi, closure_pi_set, lower_ne_upper] using closure_mono h },
tfae_have : 3 ↔ 4, from Icc_subset_Icc_iff I.lower_le_upper,
tfae_have : 4 → 2, from λ h x hx i, Ioc_subset_Ioc (h.1 i) (h.2 i) (hx i),
tfae_finish
end
variables {I J}
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_subset_coe : (I : set (ι → ℝ)) ⊆ J ↔ I ≤ J := iff.rfl
lemma le_iff_bounds : I ≤ J ↔ J.lower ≤ I.lower ∧ I.upper ≤ J.upper := (le_tfae I J).out 0 3
lemma injective_coe : injective (coe : box ι → set (ι → ℝ)) :=
begin
rintros ⟨l₁, u₁, h₁⟩ ⟨l₂, u₂, h₂⟩ h,
simp only [subset.antisymm_iff, coe_subset_coe, le_iff_bounds] at h,
congr,
exacts [le_antisymm h.2.1 h.1.1, le_antisymm h.1.2 h.2.2]
end
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_inj : (I : set (ι → ℝ)) = J ↔ I = J :=
injective_coe.eq_iff
@[ext] lemma ext (H : ∀ x, x ∈ I ↔ x ∈ J) : I = J :=
injective_coe $ set.ext H
lemma ne_of_disjoint_coe (h : disjoint (I : set (ι → ℝ)) J) : I ≠ J :=
mt coe_inj.2 $ h.ne I.coe_ne_empty
instance : partial_order (box ι) :=
{ le := (≤),
.. partial_order.lift (coe : box ι → set (ι → ℝ)) injective_coe }
/-- Closed box corresponding to `I : box_integral.box ι`. -/
protected def Icc : box ι ↪o set (ι → ℝ) :=
order_embedding.of_map_le_iff (λ I : box ι, Icc I.lower I.upper) (λ I J, (le_tfae I J).out 2 0)
lemma Icc_def : I.Icc = Icc I.lower I.upper := rfl
@[simp] lemma upper_mem_Icc (I : box ι) : I.upper ∈ I.Icc := right_mem_Icc.2 I.lower_le_upper
@[simp] lemma lower_mem_Icc (I : box ι) : I.lower ∈ I.Icc := left_mem_Icc.2 I.lower_le_upper
protected lemma is_compact_Icc (I : box ι) : is_compact I.Icc := is_compact_Icc
lemma Icc_eq_pi : I.Icc = pi univ (λ i, Icc (I.lower i) (I.upper i)) := (pi_univ_Icc _ _).symm
lemma le_iff_Icc : I ≤ J ↔ I.Icc ⊆ J.Icc := (le_tfae I J).out 0 2
lemma antitone_lower : antitone (λ I : box ι, I.lower) :=
λ I J H, (le_iff_bounds.1 H).1
lemma monotone_upper : monotone (λ I : box ι, I.upper) :=
λ I J H, (le_iff_bounds.1 H).2
lemma coe_subset_Icc : ↑I ⊆ I.Icc := λ x hx, ⟨λ i, (hx i).1.le, λ i, (hx i).2⟩
/-!
### Supremum of two boxes
-/
/-- `I ⊔ J` is the least box that includes both `I` and `J`. Since `↑I ∪ ↑J` is usually not a box,
`↑(I ⊔ J)` is larger than `↑I ∪ ↑J`. -/
instance : has_sup (box ι) :=
⟨λ I J, ⟨I.lower ⊓ J.lower, I.upper ⊔ J.upper,
λ i, (min_le_left _ _).trans_lt $ (I.lower_lt_upper i).trans_le (le_max_left _ _)⟩⟩
instance : semilattice_sup (box ι) :=
{ le_sup_left := λ I J, le_iff_bounds.2 ⟨inf_le_left, le_sup_left⟩,
le_sup_right := λ I J, le_iff_bounds.2 ⟨inf_le_right, le_sup_right⟩,
sup_le := λ I₁ I₂ J h₁ h₂, le_iff_bounds.2 ⟨le_inf (antitone_lower h₁) (antitone_lower h₂),
sup_le (monotone_upper h₁) (monotone_upper h₂)⟩,
.. box.partial_order, .. box.has_sup }
/-!
### `with_bot (box ι)`
In this section we define coercion from `with_bot (box ι)` to `set (ι → ℝ)` by sending `⊥` to `∅`.
-/
instance with_bot_coe : has_coe_t (with_bot (box ι)) (set (ι → ℝ)) := ⟨λ o, o.elim ∅ coe⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_bot : ((⊥ : with_bot (box ι)) : set (ι → ℝ)) = ∅ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_coe : ((I : with_bot (box ι)) : set (ι → ℝ)) = I := rfl
lemma is_some_iff : ∀ {I : with_bot (box ι)}, I.is_some ↔ (I : set (ι → ℝ)).nonempty
| ⊥ := by { erw option.is_some, simp }
| (I : box ι) := by { erw option.is_some, simp [I.nonempty_coe] }
lemma bUnion_coe_eq_coe (I : with_bot (box ι)) :
(⋃ (J : box ι) (hJ : ↑J = I), (J : set (ι → ℝ))) = I :=
by induction I using with_bot.rec_bot_coe; simp [with_bot.coe_eq_coe]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma with_bot_coe_subset_iff {I J : with_bot (box ι)} :
(I : set (ι → ℝ)) ⊆ J ↔ I ≤ J :=
begin
induction I using with_bot.rec_bot_coe, { simp },
induction J using with_bot.rec_bot_coe, { simp [subset_empty_iff] },
simp
end
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma with_bot_coe_inj {I J : with_bot (box ι)} :
(I : set (ι → ℝ)) = J ↔ I = J :=
by simp only [subset.antisymm_iff, ← le_antisymm_iff, with_bot_coe_subset_iff]
/-- Make a `with_bot (box ι)` from a pair of corners `l u : ι → ℝ`. If `l i < u i` for all `i`,
then the result is `⟨l, u, _⟩ : box ι`, otherwise it is `⊥`. In any case, the result interpreted
as a set in `ι → ℝ` is the set `{x : ι → ℝ | ∀ i, x i ∈ Ioc (l i) (u i)}`. -/
def mk' (l u : ι → ℝ) : with_bot (box ι) :=
if h : ∀ i, l i < u i then ↑(⟨l, u, h⟩ : box ι) else ⊥
@[simp] lemma mk'_eq_bot {l u : ι → ℝ} : mk' l u = ⊥ ↔ ∃ i, u i ≤ l i :=
by { rw mk', split_ifs; simpa using h }
@[simp] lemma mk'_eq_coe {l u : ι → ℝ} : mk' l u = I ↔ l = I.lower ∧ u = I.upper :=
begin
cases I with lI uI hI, rw mk', split_ifs,
{ simp [with_bot.coe_eq_coe] },
{ suffices : l = lI → u ≠ uI, by simpa,
rintro rfl rfl, exact h hI }
end
@[simp] lemma coe_mk' (l u : ι → ℝ) : (mk' l u : set (ι → ℝ)) = pi univ (λ i, Ioc (l i) (u i)) :=
begin
rw mk', split_ifs,
{ exact coe_eq_pi _ },
{ rcases not_forall.mp h with ⟨i, hi⟩,
rw [coe_bot, univ_pi_eq_empty], exact Ioc_eq_empty hi }
end
instance : has_inf (with_bot (box ι)) :=
⟨λ I, with_bot.rec_bot_coe (λ J, ⊥) (λ I J, with_bot.rec_bot_coe ⊥
(λ J, mk' (I.lower ⊔ J.lower) (I.upper ⊓ J.upper)) J) I⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_inf (I J : with_bot (box ι)) : (↑(I ⊓ J) : set (ι → ℝ)) = I ∩ J :=
begin
induction I using with_bot.rec_bot_coe, { change ∅ = _, simp },
induction J using with_bot.rec_bot_coe, { change ∅ = _, simp },
change ↑(mk' _ _) = _,
simp only [coe_eq_pi, ← pi_inter_distrib, Ioc_inter_Ioc, pi.sup_apply, pi.inf_apply, coe_mk',
coe_coe]
end
instance : lattice (with_bot (box ι)) :=
{ inf_le_left := λ I J,
begin
rw [← with_bot_coe_subset_iff, coe_inf],
exact inter_subset_left _ _
end,
inf_le_right := λ I J,
begin
rw [← with_bot_coe_subset_iff, coe_inf],
exact inter_subset_right _ _
end,
le_inf := λ I J₁ J₂ h₁ h₂,
begin
simp only [← with_bot_coe_subset_iff, coe_inf] at *,
exact subset_inter h₁ h₂
end,
.. with_bot.semilattice_sup, .. box.with_bot.has_inf }
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma disjoint_with_bot_coe {I J : with_bot (box ι)} :
disjoint (I : set (ι → ℝ)) J ↔ disjoint I J :=
by { simp only [disjoint, ← with_bot_coe_subset_iff, coe_inf], refl }
lemma disjoint_coe : disjoint (I : with_bot (box ι)) J ↔ disjoint (I : set (ι → ℝ)) J :=
disjoint_with_bot_coe.symm
lemma not_disjoint_coe_iff_nonempty_inter :
¬disjoint (I : with_bot (box ι)) J ↔ (I ∩ J : set (ι → ℝ)).nonempty :=
by rw [disjoint_coe, set.not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
/-!
### Hyperface of a box in `ℝⁿ⁺¹ = fin (n + 1) → ℝ`
-/
/-- Face of a box in `ℝⁿ⁺¹ = fin (n + 1) → ℝ`: the box in `ℝⁿ = fin n → ℝ` with corners at
`I.lower ∘ fin.succ_above i` and `I.upper ∘ fin.succ_above i`. -/
@[simps { simp_rhs := tt }] def face {n} (I : box (fin (n + 1))) (i : fin (n + 1)) : box (fin n) :=
⟨I.lower ∘ fin.succ_above i, I.upper ∘ fin.succ_above i, λ j, I.lower_lt_upper _⟩
@[simp] lemma face_mk {n} (l u : fin (n + 1) → ℝ) (h : ∀ i, l i < u i) (i : fin (n + 1)) :
face ⟨l, u, h⟩ i = ⟨l ∘ fin.succ_above i, u ∘ fin.succ_above i, λ j, h _⟩ :=
rfl
@[mono] lemma face_mono {n} {I J : box (fin (n + 1))} (h : I ≤ J) (i : fin (n + 1)) :
face I i ≤ face J i :=
λ x hx i, Ioc_subset_Ioc ((le_iff_bounds.1 h).1 _) ((le_iff_bounds.1 h).2 _) (hx _)
lemma monotone_face {n} (i : fin (n + 1)) : monotone (λ I, face I i) := λ I J h, face_mono h i
lemma maps_to_insert_nth_face_Icc {n} (I : box (fin (n + 1))) {i : fin (n + 1)} {x : ℝ}
(hx : x ∈ Icc (I.lower i) (I.upper i)) :
maps_to (i.insert_nth x) (I.face i).Icc I.Icc :=
λ y hy, fin.insert_nth_mem_Icc.2 ⟨hx, hy⟩
lemma maps_to_insert_nth_face {n} (I : box (fin (n + 1))) {i : fin (n + 1)} {x : ℝ}
(hx : x ∈ Ioc (I.lower i) (I.upper i)) :
maps_to (i.insert_nth x) (I.face i) I :=
λ y hy, by simpa only [mem_coe, mem_def, i.forall_iff_succ_above, hx, fin.insert_nth_apply_same,
fin.insert_nth_apply_succ_above, true_and]
lemma continuous_on_face_Icc {X} [topological_space X] {n} {f : (fin (n + 1) → ℝ) → X}
{I : box (fin (n + 1))} (h : continuous_on f I.Icc) {i : fin (n + 1)} {x : ℝ}
(hx : x ∈ Icc (I.lower i) (I.upper i)) :
continuous_on (f ∘ i.insert_nth x) (I.face i).Icc :=
h.comp (continuous_on_const.fin_insert_nth i continuous_on_id) (I.maps_to_insert_nth_face_Icc hx)
/-!
### Covering of the interior of a box by a monotone sequence of smaller boxes
-/
/-- The interior of a box. -/
protected def Ioo : box ι →o set (ι → ℝ) :=
{ to_fun := λ I, pi univ (λ i, Ioo (I.lower i) (I.upper i)),
monotone' := λ I J h, pi_mono $ λ i hi, Ioo_subset_Ioo ((le_iff_bounds.1 h).1 i)
((le_iff_bounds.1 h).2 i) }
lemma Ioo_subset_coe (I : box ι) : I.Ioo ⊆ I := λ x hx i, Ioo_subset_Ioc_self (hx i trivial)
protected lemma Ioo_subset_Icc (I : box ι) : I.Ioo ⊆ I.Icc := I.Ioo_subset_coe.trans coe_subset_Icc
lemma Union_Ioo_of_tendsto [fintype ι] {I : box ι} {J : ℕ → box ι} (hJ : monotone J)
(hl : tendsto (lower ∘ J) at_top (𝓝 I.lower)) (hu : tendsto (upper ∘ J) at_top (𝓝 I.upper)) :
(⋃ n, (J n).Ioo) = I.Ioo :=
have hl' : ∀ i, antitone (λ n, (J n).lower i),
from λ i, (monotone_eval i).comp_antitone (antitone_lower.comp_monotone hJ),
have hu' : ∀ i, monotone (λ n, (J n).upper i),
from λ i, (monotone_eval i).comp (monotone_upper.comp hJ),
calc (⋃ n, (J n).Ioo) = pi univ (λ i, ⋃ n, Ioo ((J n).lower i) ((J n).upper i)) :
Union_univ_pi_of_monotone (λ i, (hl' i).Ioo (hu' i))
... = I.Ioo :
pi_congr rfl (λ i hi, Union_Ioo_of_mono_of_is_glb_of_is_lub (hl' i) (hu' i)
(is_glb_of_tendsto_at_top (hl' i) (tendsto_pi_nhds.1 hl _))
(is_lub_of_tendsto_at_top (hu' i) (tendsto_pi_nhds.1 hu _)))
lemma exists_seq_mono_tendsto (I : box ι) : ∃ J : ℕ →o box ι, (∀ n, (J n).Icc ⊆ I.Ioo) ∧
tendsto (lower ∘ J) at_top (𝓝 I.lower) ∧ tendsto (upper ∘ J) at_top (𝓝 I.upper) :=
begin
choose a b ha_anti hb_mono ha_mem hb_mem hab ha_tendsto hb_tendsto
using λ i, exists_seq_strict_anti_strict_mono_tendsto (I.lower_lt_upper i),
exact ⟨⟨λ k, ⟨flip a k, flip b k, λ i, hab _ _ _⟩,
λ k l hkl, le_iff_bounds.2 ⟨λ i, (ha_anti i).antitone hkl, λ i, (hb_mono i).monotone hkl⟩⟩,
λ n x hx i hi, ⟨(ha_mem _ _).1.trans_le (hx.1 _), (hx.2 _).trans_lt (hb_mem _ _).2⟩,
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 ha_tendsto, tendsto_pi_nhds.2 hb_tendsto⟩
end
section distortion
variable [fintype ι]
/-- The distortion of a box `I` is the maximum of the ratios of the lengths of its edges.
It is defined as the maximum of the ratios
`nndist I.lower I.upper / nndist (I.lower i) (I.upper i)`. -/
def distortion (I : box ι) : ℝ≥0 :=
finset.univ.sup $ λ i : ι, nndist I.lower I.upper / nndist (I.lower i) (I.upper i)
lemma distortion_eq_of_sub_eq_div {I J : box ι} {r : ℝ}
(h : ∀ i, I.upper i - I.lower i = (J.upper i - J.lower i) / r) :
distortion I = distortion J :=
begin
simp only [distortion, nndist_pi_def, real.nndist_eq', h, map_div₀],
congr' 1 with i,
have : 0 < r,
{ by_contra hr,
have := div_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos (sub_nonneg.2 $ J.lower_le_upper i) (not_lt.1 hr),
rw ← h at this,
exact this.not_lt (sub_pos.2 $ I.lower_lt_upper i) },
simp only [nnreal.finset_sup_div, div_div_div_cancel_right _ (real.nnabs.map_ne_zero.2 this.ne')]
end
lemma nndist_le_distortion_mul (I : box ι) (i : ι) :
nndist I.lower I.upper ≤ I.distortion * nndist (I.lower i) (I.upper i) :=
calc nndist I.lower I.upper =
(nndist I.lower I.upper / nndist (I.lower i) (I.upper i)) * nndist (I.lower i) (I.upper i) :
(div_mul_cancel _ $ mt nndist_eq_zero.1 (I.lower_lt_upper i).ne).symm
... ≤ I.distortion * nndist (I.lower i) (I.upper i) :
mul_le_mul_right' (finset.le_sup $ finset.mem_univ i) _
lemma dist_le_distortion_mul (I : box ι) (i : ι) :
dist I.lower I.upper ≤ I.distortion * (I.upper i - I.lower i) :=
have A : I.lower i - I.upper i < 0, from sub_neg.2 (I.lower_lt_upper i),
by simpa only [← nnreal.coe_le_coe, ← dist_nndist, nnreal.coe_mul, real.dist_eq,
abs_of_neg A, neg_sub] using I.nndist_le_distortion_mul i
lemma diam_Icc_le_of_distortion_le (I : box ι) (i : ι) {c : ℝ≥0} (h : I.distortion ≤ c) :
diam I.Icc ≤ c * (I.upper i - I.lower i) :=
have (0 : ℝ) ≤ c * (I.upper i - I.lower i),
from mul_nonneg c.coe_nonneg (sub_nonneg.2 $ I.lower_le_upper _),
diam_le_of_forall_dist_le this $ λ x hx y hy,
calc dist x y ≤ dist I.lower I.upper : real.dist_le_of_mem_pi_Icc hx hy
... ≤ I.distortion * (I.upper i - I.lower i) : I.dist_le_distortion_mul i
... ≤ c * (I.upper i - I.lower i) :
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h (sub_nonneg.2 (I.lower_le_upper i))
end distortion
end box
end box_integral
|
9e154bb337e7b44216826fa2036224e5acd49876 | 57c233acf9386e610d99ed20ef139c5f97504ba3 | /src/algebraic_geometry/AffineScheme.lean | 82c60f1351940b9a19b83121b4c3be0c7ec95b1f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | robertylewis/mathlib | 3d16e3e6daf5ddde182473e03a1b601d2810952c | 1d13f5b932f5e40a8308e3840f96fc882fae01f0 | refs/heads/master | 1,651,379,945,369 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 98,875,504 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,644,253,514,000 | 1,501,495,700,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 17,476 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import algebraic_geometry.Gamma_Spec_adjunction
import algebraic_geometry.open_immersion
import category_theory.limits.opposites
/-!
# Affine schemes
We define the category of `AffineScheme`s as the essential image of `Spec`.
We also define predicates about affine schemes and affine open sets.
## Main definitions
* `algebraic_geometry.AffineScheme`: The category of affine schemes.
* `algebraic_geometry.is_affine`: A scheme is affine if the canonical map `X ⟶ Spec Γ(X)` is an
isomorphism.
* `algebraic_geometry.Scheme.iso_Spec`: The canonical isomorphism `X ≅ Spec Γ(X)` for an affine
scheme.
* `algebraic_geometry.AffineScheme.equiv_CommRing`: The equivalence of categories
`AffineScheme ≌ CommRingᵒᵖ` given by `AffineScheme.Spec : CommRingᵒᵖ ⥤ AffineScheme` and
`AffineScheme.Γ : AffineSchemeᵒᵖ ⥤ CommRing`.
* `algebraic_geometry.is_affine_open`: An open subset of a scheme is affine if the open subscheme is
affine.
* `algebraic_geometry.is_affine_open.from_Spec`: The immersion `Spec 𝒪ₓ(U) ⟶ X` for an affine `U`.
-/
noncomputable theory
open category_theory category_theory.limits opposite topological_space
universe u
namespace algebraic_geometry
/-- The category of affine schemes -/
def AffineScheme := Scheme.Spec.ess_image
/-- A Scheme is affine if the canonical map `X ⟶ Spec Γ(X)` is an isomorphism. -/
class is_affine (X : Scheme) : Prop :=
(affine : is_iso (Γ_Spec.adjunction.unit.app X))
attribute [instance] is_affine.affine
/-- The canonical isomorphism `X ≅ Spec Γ(X)` for an affine scheme. -/
def Scheme.iso_Spec (X : Scheme) [is_affine X] :
X ≅ Scheme.Spec.obj (op $ Scheme.Γ.obj $ op X) :=
as_iso (Γ_Spec.adjunction.unit.app X)
lemma mem_AffineScheme (X : Scheme) : X ∈ AffineScheme ↔ is_affine X :=
⟨λ h, ⟨functor.ess_image.unit_is_iso h⟩, λ h, @@mem_ess_image_of_unit_is_iso _ _ _ X h.1⟩
instance is_affine_AffineScheme (X : AffineScheme.{u}) : is_affine (X : Scheme.{u}) :=
(mem_AffineScheme _).mp X.prop
instance Spec_is_affine (R : CommRingᵒᵖ) : is_affine (Scheme.Spec.obj R) :=
(mem_AffineScheme _).mp (Scheme.Spec.obj_mem_ess_image R)
lemma is_affine_of_iso {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) [is_iso f] [h : is_affine Y] :
is_affine X :=
by { rw [← mem_AffineScheme] at h ⊢, exact functor.ess_image.of_iso (as_iso f).symm h }
namespace AffineScheme
/-- The `Spec` functor into the category of affine schemes. -/
@[derive [full, faithful, ess_surj], simps]
def Spec : CommRingᵒᵖ ⥤ AffineScheme := Scheme.Spec.to_ess_image
/-- The forgetful functor `AffineScheme ⥤ Scheme`. -/
@[derive [full, faithful], simps]
def forget_to_Scheme : AffineScheme ⥤ Scheme := Scheme.Spec.ess_image_inclusion
/-- The global section functor of an affine scheme. -/
def Γ : AffineSchemeᵒᵖ ⥤ CommRing := forget_to_Scheme.op ⋙ Scheme.Γ
/-- The category of affine schemes is equivalent to the category of commutative rings. -/
def equiv_CommRing : AffineScheme ≌ CommRingᵒᵖ :=
equiv_ess_image_of_reflective.symm
instance Γ_is_equiv : is_equivalence Γ.{u} :=
begin
haveI : is_equivalence Γ.{u}.right_op.op := is_equivalence.of_equivalence equiv_CommRing.op,
exact (functor.is_equivalence_trans Γ.{u}.right_op.op (op_op_equivalence _).functor : _),
end
instance : has_colimits AffineScheme.{u} :=
begin
haveI := adjunction.has_limits_of_equivalence.{u} Γ.{u},
haveI : has_colimits AffineScheme.{u} ᵒᵖᵒᵖ := has_colimits_op_of_has_limits,
exactI adjunction.has_colimits_of_equivalence.{u} (op_op_equivalence AffineScheme.{u}).inverse
end
instance : has_limits AffineScheme.{u} :=
begin
haveI := adjunction.has_colimits_of_equivalence Γ.{u},
haveI : has_limits AffineScheme.{u} ᵒᵖᵒᵖ := limits.has_limits_op_of_has_colimits,
exactI adjunction.has_limits_of_equivalence (op_op_equivalence AffineScheme.{u}).inverse
end
end AffineScheme
/-- An open subset of a scheme is affine if the open subscheme is affine. -/
def is_affine_open {X : Scheme} (U : opens X.carrier) : Prop :=
is_affine (X.restrict U.open_embedding)
lemma range_is_affine_open_of_open_immersion {X Y : Scheme} [is_affine X] (f : X ⟶ Y)
[H : is_open_immersion f] : is_affine_open ⟨set.range f.1.base, H.base_open.open_range⟩ :=
begin
refine is_affine_of_iso (is_open_immersion.iso_of_range_eq f (Y.of_restrict _) _).inv,
exact subtype.range_coe.symm,
apply_instance
end
lemma top_is_affine_open (X : Scheme) [is_affine X] : is_affine_open (⊤ : opens X.carrier) :=
begin
convert range_is_affine_open_of_open_immersion (𝟙 X),
ext1,
exact set.range_id.symm
end
instance Scheme.affine_basis_cover_is_affine (X : Scheme) (i : X.affine_basis_cover.J) :
is_affine (X.affine_basis_cover.obj i) :=
algebraic_geometry.Spec_is_affine _
lemma is_basis_affine_open (X : Scheme) :
opens.is_basis { U : opens X.carrier | is_affine_open U } :=
begin
rw opens.is_basis_iff_nbhd,
rintros U x (hU : x ∈ (U : set X.carrier)),
obtain ⟨S, hS, hxS, hSU⟩ := X.affine_basis_cover_is_basis.exists_subset_of_mem_open hU U.prop,
refine ⟨⟨S, X.affine_basis_cover_is_basis.is_open hS⟩, _, hxS, hSU⟩,
rcases hS with ⟨i, rfl⟩,
exact range_is_affine_open_of_open_immersion _,
end
/-- The open immersion `Spec 𝒪ₓ(U) ⟶ X` for an affine `U`. -/
def is_affine_open.from_Spec {X : Scheme} {U : opens X.carrier} (hU : is_affine_open U) :
Scheme.Spec.obj (op $ X.presheaf.obj $ op U) ⟶ X :=
begin
haveI : is_affine (X.restrict U.open_embedding) := hU,
have : U.open_embedding.is_open_map.functor.obj ⊤ = U,
{ ext1, exact set.image_univ.trans subtype.range_coe },
exact Scheme.Spec.map (X.presheaf.map (eq_to_hom this.symm).op).op ≫
(X.restrict U.open_embedding).iso_Spec.inv ≫ X.of_restrict _
end
instance is_affine_open.is_open_immersion_from_Spec {X : Scheme} {U : opens X.carrier}
(hU : is_affine_open U) :
is_open_immersion hU.from_Spec :=
by { delta is_affine_open.from_Spec, apply_instance }
lemma is_affine_open.from_Spec_range {X : Scheme} {U : opens X.carrier} (hU : is_affine_open U) :
set.range hU.from_Spec.1.base = (U : set X.carrier) :=
begin
delta is_affine_open.from_Spec,
erw [← category.assoc, Scheme.comp_val_base],
rw [coe_comp, set.range_comp, set.range_iff_surjective.mpr, set.image_univ],
exact subtype.range_coe,
rw ← Top.epi_iff_surjective,
apply_instance
end
lemma is_affine_open.from_Spec_image_top {X : Scheme} {U : opens X.carrier}
(hU : is_affine_open U) :
hU.is_open_immersion_from_Spec.base_open.is_open_map.functor.obj ⊤ = U :=
by { ext1, exact set.image_univ.trans hU.from_Spec_range }
lemma is_affine_open.is_compact {X : Scheme} {U : opens X.carrier} (hU : is_affine_open U) :
is_compact (U : set X.carrier) :=
begin
convert @is_compact.image _ _ _ _ set.univ hU.from_Spec.1.base
prime_spectrum.compact_space.1 (by continuity),
convert hU.from_Spec_range.symm,
exact set.image_univ
end
instance Scheme.quasi_compact_of_affine (X : Scheme) [is_affine X] : compact_space X.carrier :=
⟨(top_is_affine_open X).is_compact⟩
lemma is_affine_open.from_Spec_base_preimage
{X : Scheme} {U : opens X.carrier} (hU : is_affine_open U) :
(opens.map hU.from_Spec.val.base).obj U = ⊤ :=
begin
ext1,
change hU.from_Spec.1.base ⁻¹' (U : set X.carrier) = set.univ,
rw [← hU.from_Spec_range, ← set.image_univ],
exact set.preimage_image_eq _ PresheafedSpace.is_open_immersion.base_open.inj
end
lemma Scheme.Spec_map_presheaf_map_eq_to_hom {X : Scheme} {U V : opens X.carrier} (h : U = V) (W) :
(Scheme.Spec.map (X.presheaf.map (eq_to_hom h).op).op).val.c.app W =
eq_to_hom (by { cases h, dsimp, induction W using opposite.rec, congr, ext1, simpa }) :=
begin
have : Scheme.Spec.map (X.presheaf.map (𝟙 (op U))).op = 𝟙 _,
{ rw [X.presheaf.map_id, op_id, Scheme.Spec.map_id] },
cases h,
refine (Scheme.congr_app this _).trans _,
erw category.id_comp,
simpa
end
lemma is_affine_open.Spec_Γ_identity_hom_app_from_Spec {X : Scheme} {U : opens X.carrier}
(hU : is_affine_open U) :
(Spec_Γ_identity.hom.app (X.presheaf.obj $ op U)) ≫ hU.from_Spec.1.c.app (op U) =
(Scheme.Spec.obj _).presheaf.map (eq_to_hom hU.from_Spec_base_preimage).op :=
begin
haveI : is_affine _ := hU,
have e₁ :=
Spec_Γ_identity.hom.naturality (X.presheaf.map (eq_to_hom U.open_embedding_obj_top).op),
rw ← is_iso.comp_inv_eq at e₁,
have e₂ := Γ_Spec.adjunction_unit_app_app_top (X.restrict U.open_embedding),
erw ← e₂ at e₁,
simp only [functor.id_map, quiver.hom.unop_op, functor.comp_map, ← functor.map_inv, ← op_inv,
LocallyRingedSpace.Γ_map, category.assoc, functor.right_op_map, inv_eq_to_hom] at e₁,
delta is_affine_open.from_Spec Scheme.iso_Spec,
rw [Scheme.comp_val_c_app, Scheme.comp_val_c_app, ← e₁],
simp_rw category.assoc,
erw ← X.presheaf.map_comp_assoc,
rw ← op_comp,
have e₃ : U.open_embedding.is_open_map.adjunction.counit.app U ≫
eq_to_hom U.open_embedding_obj_top.symm =
U.open_embedding.is_open_map.functor.map (eq_to_hom U.inclusion_map_eq_top) :=
subsingleton.elim _ _,
have e₄ : X.presheaf.map _ ≫ _ = _ :=
(as_iso (Γ_Spec.adjunction.unit.app (X.restrict U.open_embedding)))
.inv.1.c.naturality_assoc (eq_to_hom U.inclusion_map_eq_top).op _,
erw [e₃, e₄, ← Scheme.comp_val_c_app_assoc, iso.inv_hom_id],
simp only [eq_to_hom_map, eq_to_hom_op, Scheme.Spec_map_presheaf_map_eq_to_hom],
erw [Scheme.Spec_map_presheaf_map_eq_to_hom, category.id_comp],
simpa only [eq_to_hom_trans]
end
@[elementwise]
lemma is_affine_open.from_Spec_app_eq {X : Scheme} {U : opens X.carrier}
(hU : is_affine_open U) :
hU.from_Spec.1.c.app (op U) = Spec_Γ_identity.inv.app (X.presheaf.obj $ op U) ≫
(Scheme.Spec.obj _).presheaf.map (eq_to_hom hU.from_Spec_base_preimage).op :=
by rw [← hU.Spec_Γ_identity_hom_app_from_Spec, iso.inv_hom_id_app_assoc]
lemma is_affine_open.basic_open_is_affine {X : Scheme} {U : opens X.carrier}
(hU : is_affine_open U) (f : X.presheaf.obj (op U)) : is_affine_open (X.basic_open f) :=
begin
convert range_is_affine_open_of_open_immersion (Scheme.Spec.map (CommRing.of_hom
(algebra_map (X.presheaf.obj (op U)) (localization.away f))).op ≫ hU.from_Spec),
ext1,
have : hU.from_Spec.val.base '' (hU.from_Spec.val.base ⁻¹' (X.basic_open f : set X.carrier)) =
(X.basic_open f : set X.carrier),
{ rw [set.image_preimage_eq_inter_range, set.inter_eq_left_iff_subset, hU.from_Spec_range],
exact Scheme.basic_open_subset _ _ },
rw [subtype.coe_mk, Scheme.comp_val_base, ← this, coe_comp, set.range_comp],
congr' 1,
refine (congr_arg coe $ Scheme.preimage_basic_open hU.from_Spec f).trans _,
refine eq.trans _ (prime_spectrum.localization_away_comap_range (localization.away f) f).symm,
congr' 1,
have : (opens.map hU.from_Spec.val.base).obj U = ⊤,
{ ext1,
change hU.from_Spec.1.base ⁻¹' (U : set X.carrier) = set.univ,
rw [← hU.from_Spec_range, ← set.image_univ],
exact set.preimage_image_eq _ PresheafedSpace.is_open_immersion.base_open.inj },
refine eq.trans _ (basic_open_eq_of_affine f),
have lm : ∀ s, (opens.map hU.from_Spec.val.base).obj U ⊓ s = s := λ s, this.symm ▸ top_inf_eq,
refine eq.trans _ (lm _),
refine eq.trans _
((Scheme.Spec.obj $ op $ X.presheaf.obj $ op U).basic_open_res _ (eq_to_hom this).op),
rw ← comp_apply,
congr' 2,
rw iso.eq_inv_comp,
erw hU.Spec_Γ_identity_hom_app_from_Spec,
end
lemma Scheme.map_prime_spectrum_basic_open_of_affine (X : Scheme) [is_affine X]
(f : Scheme.Γ.obj (op X)) :
(opens.map X.iso_Spec.hom.1.base).obj (prime_spectrum.basic_open f) = X.basic_open f :=
begin
rw ← basic_open_eq_of_affine,
transitivity (opens.map X.iso_Spec.hom.1.base).obj ((Scheme.Spec.obj
(op (Scheme.Γ.obj (op X)))).basic_open ((inv (X.iso_Spec.hom.1.c.app
(op ((opens.map (inv X.iso_Spec.hom).val.base).obj ⊤)))) ((X.presheaf.map (eq_to_hom _)) f))),
congr,
{ rw [← is_iso.inv_eq_inv, is_iso.inv_inv, is_iso.iso.inv_inv, nat_iso.app_hom],
erw ← Γ_Spec.adjunction_unit_app_app_top,
refl },
{ rw eq_to_hom_map, refl },
{ dsimp, congr },
{ refine (Scheme.preimage_basic_open _ _).trans _,
rw [is_iso.inv_hom_id_apply, Scheme.basic_open_res_eq] }
end
lemma is_basis_basic_open (X : Scheme) [is_affine X] :
opens.is_basis (set.range (X.basic_open : X.presheaf.obj (op ⊤) → opens X.carrier)) :=
begin
delta opens.is_basis,
convert prime_spectrum.is_basis_basic_opens.inducing
(Top.homeo_of_iso (Scheme.forget_to_Top.map_iso X.iso_Spec)).inducing using 1,
ext,
simp only [set.mem_image, exists_exists_eq_and],
split,
{ rintro ⟨_, ⟨x, rfl⟩, rfl⟩,
refine ⟨_, ⟨_, ⟨x, rfl⟩, rfl⟩, _⟩,
exact congr_arg subtype.val (X.map_prime_spectrum_basic_open_of_affine x) },
{ rintro ⟨_, ⟨_, ⟨x, rfl⟩, rfl⟩, rfl⟩,
refine ⟨_, ⟨x, rfl⟩, _⟩,
exact congr_arg subtype.val (X.map_prime_spectrum_basic_open_of_affine x).symm }
end
/-- The prime ideal of `𝒪ₓ(U)` corresponding to a point `x : U`. -/
noncomputable
def is_affine_open.prime_ideal_of {X : Scheme} {U : opens X.carrier}
(hU : is_affine_open U) (x : U) :
prime_spectrum (X.presheaf.obj $ op U) :=
((Scheme.Spec.map (X.presheaf.map (eq_to_hom $
show U.open_embedding.is_open_map.functor.obj ⊤ = U, from
opens.ext (set.image_univ.trans subtype.range_coe)).op).op).1.base
((@@Scheme.iso_Spec (X.restrict U.open_embedding) hU).hom.1.base x))
lemma is_affine_open.from_Spec_prime_ideal_of {X : Scheme} {U : opens X.carrier}
(hU : is_affine_open U) (x : U) :
hU.from_Spec.val.base (hU.prime_ideal_of x) = x.1 :=
begin
dsimp only [is_affine_open.from_Spec, subtype.coe_mk],
erw [← Scheme.comp_val_base_apply, ← Scheme.comp_val_base_apply],
simpa only [← functor.map_comp_assoc, ← functor.map_comp, ← op_comp, eq_to_hom_trans, op_id,
eq_to_hom_refl, category_theory.functor.map_id, category.id_comp, iso.hom_inv_id_assoc]
end
lemma is_affine_open.is_localization_stalk_aux {X : Scheme} (U : opens X.carrier)
[is_affine (X.restrict U.open_embedding)] :
(inv (Γ_Spec.adjunction.unit.app (X.restrict U.open_embedding))).1.c.app
(op ((opens.map U.inclusion).obj U)) =
X.presheaf.map (eq_to_hom $ by rw opens.inclusion_map_eq_top :
U.open_embedding.is_open_map.functor.obj ⊤ ⟶
(U.open_embedding.is_open_map.functor.obj ((opens.map U.inclusion).obj U))).op ≫
to_Spec_Γ (X.presheaf.obj $ op (U.open_embedding.is_open_map.functor.obj ⊤)) ≫
(Scheme.Spec.obj $ op $ X.presheaf.obj $ _).presheaf.map
(eq_to_hom (by { rw [opens.inclusion_map_eq_top], refl }) : unop _ ⟶ ⊤).op :=
begin
have e : (opens.map (inv (Γ_Spec.adjunction.unit.app (X.restrict U.open_embedding))).1.base).obj
((opens.map U.inclusion).obj U) = ⊤,
by { rw [opens.inclusion_map_eq_top], refl },
rw [Scheme.inv_val_c_app, is_iso.comp_inv_eq, Scheme.app_eq _ e,
Γ_Spec.adjunction_unit_app_app_top],
simp only [category.assoc, eq_to_hom_op],
erw ← functor.map_comp_assoc,
rw [eq_to_hom_trans, eq_to_hom_refl, category_theory.functor.map_id,
category.id_comp],
erw Spec_Γ_identity.inv_hom_id_app_assoc,
simp only [eq_to_hom_map, eq_to_hom_trans],
end
lemma is_affine_open.is_localization_stalk {X : Scheme} {U : opens X.carrier}
(hU : is_affine_open U) (x : U) :
is_localization.at_prime (X.presheaf.stalk x) (hU.prime_ideal_of x).as_ideal :=
begin
haveI : is_affine _ := hU,
haveI : nonempty U := ⟨x⟩,
rcases x with ⟨x, hx⟩,
let y := hU.prime_ideal_of ⟨x, hx⟩,
have : hU.from_Spec.val.base y = x := hU.from_Spec_prime_ideal_of ⟨x, hx⟩,
change is_localization y.as_ideal.prime_compl _,
clear_value y,
subst this,
apply (is_localization.is_localization_iff_of_ring_equiv _
(as_iso $ PresheafedSpace.stalk_map hU.from_Spec.1 y).CommRing_iso_to_ring_equiv).mpr,
convert structure_sheaf.is_localization.to_stalk _ _ using 1,
delta structure_sheaf.stalk_algebra,
congr' 1,
rw ring_hom.algebra_map_to_algebra,
refine (PresheafedSpace.stalk_map_germ hU.from_Spec.1 _ ⟨_, _⟩).trans _,
delta is_affine_open.from_Spec Scheme.iso_Spec structure_sheaf.to_stalk,
simp only [Scheme.comp_val_c_app, category.assoc],
dsimp only [functor.op, as_iso_inv, unop_op],
erw is_affine_open.is_localization_stalk_aux,
simp only [category.assoc],
conv_lhs { rw ← category.assoc },
erw [← X.presheaf.map_comp, Spec_Γ_naturality_assoc],
congr' 1,
simp only [← category.assoc],
transitivity _ ≫ (structure_sheaf (X.presheaf.obj $ op U)).1.germ ⟨_, _⟩,
{ refl },
convert ((structure_sheaf (X.presheaf.obj $ op U)).1.germ_res (hom_of_le le_top) ⟨_, _⟩) using 2,
rw category.assoc,
erw nat_trans.naturality,
rw [← LocallyRingedSpace.Γ_map_op, ← LocallyRingedSpace.Γ.map_comp_assoc, ← op_comp],
erw ← Scheme.Spec.map_comp,
rw [← op_comp, ← X.presheaf.map_comp],
transitivity LocallyRingedSpace.Γ.map (quiver.hom.op $ Scheme.Spec.map
(X.presheaf.map (𝟙 (op U))).op) ≫ _,
{ congr },
simp only [category_theory.functor.map_id, op_id],
erw category_theory.functor.map_id,
rw category.id_comp,
refl
end
end algebraic_geometry
|
321d78b5e70f9cdb4e7a4645df5b0bcf0454c4aa | 69d4931b605e11ca61881fc4f66db50a0a875e39 | /src/ring_theory/adjoin/basic.lean | 73c19a8137cd7b7c4b75b241d080276df112f3da | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | abentkamp/mathlib | d9a75d291ec09f4637b0f30cc3880ffb07549ee5 | 5360e476391508e092b5a1e5210bd0ed22dc0755 | refs/heads/master | 1,682,382,954,948 | 1,622,106,077,000 | 1,622,106,077,000 | 149,285,665 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,270 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import ring_theory.polynomial.basic
import algebra.algebra.subalgebra
/-!
# Adjoining elements to form subalgebras
This file develops the basic theory of subalgebras of an R-algebra generated
by a set of elements. A basic interface for `adjoin` is set up, and various
results about finitely-generated subalgebras and submodules are proved.
## Definitions
* `fg (S : subalgebra R A)` : A predicate saying that the subalgebra is finitely-generated
as an A-algebra
## Tags
adjoin, algebra, finitely-generated algebra
-/
universes u v w
open submodule
namespace algebra
variables {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w}
section semiring
variables [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [semiring B]
variables [algebra R A] [algebra R B] {s t : set A}
open subsemiring
theorem subset_adjoin : s ⊆ adjoin R s :=
algebra.gc.le_u_l s
theorem adjoin_le {S : subalgebra R A} (H : s ⊆ S) : adjoin R s ≤ S :=
algebra.gc.l_le H
theorem adjoin_le_iff {S : subalgebra R A} : adjoin R s ≤ S ↔ s ⊆ S:=
algebra.gc _ _
theorem adjoin_mono (H : s ⊆ t) : adjoin R s ≤ adjoin R t :=
algebra.gc.monotone_l H
variables (R A)
@[simp] theorem adjoin_empty : adjoin R (∅ : set A) = ⊥ :=
show adjoin R ⊥ = ⊥, by { apply galois_connection.l_bot, exact algebra.gc }
variables (R) {A} (s)
theorem adjoin_eq_span : (adjoin R s).to_submodule = span R (submonoid.closure s) :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ intros r hr, rcases subsemiring.mem_closure_iff_exists_list.1 hr with ⟨L, HL, rfl⟩, clear hr,
induction L with hd tl ih, { exact zero_mem _ },
rw list.forall_mem_cons at HL,
rw [list.map_cons, list.sum_cons],
refine submodule.add_mem _ _ (ih HL.2),
replace HL := HL.1, clear ih tl,
suffices : ∃ z r (hr : r ∈ submonoid.closure s), has_scalar.smul z r = list.prod hd,
{ rcases this with ⟨z, r, hr, hzr⟩, rw ← hzr,
exact smul_mem _ _ (subset_span hr) },
induction hd with hd tl ih, { exact ⟨1, 1, (submonoid.closure s).one_mem', one_smul _ _⟩ },
rw list.forall_mem_cons at HL,
rcases (ih HL.2) with ⟨z, r, hr, hzr⟩, rw [list.prod_cons, ← hzr],
rcases HL.1 with ⟨hd, rfl⟩ | hs,
{ refine ⟨hd * z, r, hr, _⟩,
rw [algebra.smul_def, algebra.smul_def, (algebra_map _ _).map_mul, _root_.mul_assoc] },
{ exact ⟨z, hd * r, submonoid.mul_mem _ (submonoid.subset_closure hs) hr,
(mul_smul_comm _ _ _).symm⟩ } },
refine span_le.2 _,
change submonoid.closure s ≤ (adjoin R s).to_subsemiring.to_submonoid,
exact submonoid.closure_le.2 subset_adjoin
end
lemma adjoin_image (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (s : set A) :
adjoin R (f '' s) = (adjoin R s).map f :=
le_antisymm (adjoin_le $ set.image_subset _ subset_adjoin) $
subalgebra.map_le.2 $ adjoin_le $ set.image_subset_iff.1 subset_adjoin
@[simp] lemma adjoin_insert_adjoin (x : A) :
adjoin R (insert x ↑(adjoin R s)) = adjoin R (insert x s) :=
le_antisymm
(adjoin_le (set.insert_subset.mpr
⟨subset_adjoin (set.mem_insert _ _), adjoin_mono (set.subset_insert _ _)⟩))
(algebra.adjoin_mono (set.insert_subset_insert algebra.subset_adjoin))
end semiring
section comm_semiring
variables [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring A]
variables [algebra R A] {s t : set A}
open subsemiring
variables (R s t)
theorem adjoin_union : adjoin R (s ∪ t) = (adjoin R s).under (adjoin (adjoin R s) t) :=
le_antisymm
(closure_mono $ set.union_subset
(set.range_subset_iff.2 $ λ r, or.inl ⟨algebra_map R (adjoin R s) r, rfl⟩)
(set.union_subset_union_left _ $ λ x hxs, ⟨⟨_, subset_adjoin hxs⟩, rfl⟩))
(closure_le.2 $ set.union_subset
(set.range_subset_iff.2 $ λ x, adjoin_mono (set.subset_union_left _ _) x.2)
(set.subset.trans (set.subset_union_right _ _) subset_adjoin))
theorem adjoin_eq_range :
adjoin R s = (mv_polynomial.aeval (coe : s → A)).range :=
le_antisymm
(adjoin_le $ λ x hx, ⟨mv_polynomial.X ⟨x, hx⟩, mv_polynomial.eval₂_X _ _ _⟩)
(λ x ⟨p, (hp : mv_polynomial.aeval coe p = x)⟩, hp ▸ mv_polynomial.induction_on p
(λ r, by { rw [mv_polynomial.aeval_def, mv_polynomial.eval₂_C],
exact (adjoin R s).algebra_map_mem r })
(λ p q hp hq, by rw alg_hom.map_add; exact subalgebra.add_mem _ hp hq)
(λ p ⟨n, hn⟩ hp, by rw [alg_hom.map_mul, mv_polynomial.aeval_def _ (mv_polynomial.X _),
mv_polynomial.eval₂_X]; exact subalgebra.mul_mem _ hp (subset_adjoin hn)))
theorem adjoin_singleton_eq_range (x : A) : adjoin R {x} = (polynomial.aeval x).range :=
le_antisymm
(adjoin_le $ set.singleton_subset_iff.2 ⟨polynomial.X, polynomial.eval₂_X _ _⟩)
(λ y ⟨p, (hp : polynomial.aeval x p = y)⟩, hp ▸ polynomial.induction_on p
(λ r, by { rw [polynomial.aeval_def, polynomial.eval₂_C],
exact (adjoin R _).algebra_map_mem r })
(λ p q hp hq, by rw alg_hom.map_add; exact subalgebra.add_mem _ hp hq)
(λ n r ih, by { rw [pow_succ', ← mul_assoc, alg_hom.map_mul,
polynomial.aeval_def _ polynomial.X, polynomial.eval₂_X],
exact subalgebra.mul_mem _ ih (subset_adjoin rfl) }))
lemma adjoin_singleton_one : adjoin R ({1} : set A) = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 $ adjoin_le $ set.singleton_subset_iff.2 $ set_like.mem_coe.2 $ one_mem _
theorem adjoin_union_coe_submodule : (adjoin R (s ∪ t)).to_submodule =
(adjoin R s).to_submodule * (adjoin R t).to_submodule :=
begin
rw [adjoin_eq_span, adjoin_eq_span, adjoin_eq_span, span_mul_span],
congr' 1 with z, simp [submonoid.closure_union, submonoid.mem_sup, set.mem_mul]
end
end comm_semiring
section ring
variables [comm_ring R] [ring A]
variables [algebra R A] {s t : set A}
variables {R s t}
open ring
theorem adjoin_int (s : set R) : adjoin ℤ s = subalgebra_of_is_subring (closure s) :=
le_antisymm (adjoin_le subset_closure) (closure_subset subset_adjoin : closure s ≤ adjoin ℤ s)
theorem mem_adjoin_iff {s : set A} {x : A} :
x ∈ adjoin R s ↔ x ∈ closure (set.range (algebra_map R A) ∪ s) :=
⟨λ hx, subsemiring.closure_induction hx subset_closure is_add_submonoid.zero_mem
is_submonoid.one_mem (λ _ _, is_add_submonoid.add_mem) (λ _ _, is_submonoid.mul_mem),
suffices closure (set.range ⇑(algebra_map R A) ∪ s) ⊆ adjoin R s, from @this x,
closure_subset subsemiring.subset_closure⟩
theorem adjoin_eq_ring_closure (s : set A) :
(adjoin R s : set A) = closure (set.range (algebra_map R A) ∪ s) :=
set.ext $ λ x, mem_adjoin_iff
end ring
section comm_ring
variables [comm_ring R] [comm_ring A]
variables [algebra R A] {s t : set A}
variables {R s t}
open ring
theorem fg_trans (h1 : (adjoin R s).to_submodule.fg)
(h2 : (adjoin (adjoin R s) t).to_submodule.fg) :
(adjoin R (s ∪ t)).to_submodule.fg :=
begin
rcases fg_def.1 h1 with ⟨p, hp, hp'⟩,
rcases fg_def.1 h2 with ⟨q, hq, hq'⟩,
refine fg_def.2 ⟨p * q, hp.mul hq, le_antisymm _ _⟩,
{ rw [span_le],
rintros _ ⟨x, y, hx, hy, rfl⟩,
change x * y ∈ _,
refine is_submonoid.mul_mem _ _,
{ have : x ∈ (adjoin R s).to_submodule,
{ rw ← hp', exact subset_span hx },
exact adjoin_mono (set.subset_union_left _ _) this },
have : y ∈ (adjoin (adjoin R s) t).to_submodule,
{ rw ← hq', exact subset_span hy },
change y ∈ adjoin R (s ∪ t), rwa adjoin_union },
{ intros r hr,
change r ∈ adjoin R (s ∪ t) at hr,
rw adjoin_union at hr,
change r ∈ (adjoin (adjoin R s) t).to_submodule at hr,
haveI := classical.dec_eq A,
haveI := classical.dec_eq R,
rw [← hq', ← set.image_id q, finsupp.mem_span_iff_total (adjoin R s)] at hr,
rcases hr with ⟨l, hlq, rfl⟩,
have := @finsupp.total_apply A A (adjoin R s),
rw [this, finsupp.sum],
refine sum_mem _ _,
intros z hz, change (l z).1 * _ ∈ _,
have : (l z).1 ∈ (adjoin R s).to_submodule := (l z).2,
rw [← hp', ← set.image_id p, finsupp.mem_span_iff_total R] at this,
rcases this with ⟨l2, hlp, hl⟩,
have := @finsupp.total_apply A A R,
rw this at hl,
rw [←hl, finsupp.sum_mul],
refine sum_mem _ _,
intros t ht, change _ * _ ∈ _, rw smul_mul_assoc, refine smul_mem _ _ _,
exact subset_span ⟨t, z, hlp ht, hlq hz, rfl⟩ }
end
end comm_ring
end algebra
namespace subalgebra
variables {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w}
variables [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [algebra R A] [semiring B] [algebra R B]
/-- A subalgebra `S` is finitely generated if there exists `t : finset A` such that
`algebra.adjoin R t = S`. -/
def fg (S : subalgebra R A) : Prop :=
∃ t : finset A, algebra.adjoin R ↑t = S
lemma fg_adjoin_finset (s : finset A) : (algebra.adjoin R (↑s : set A)).fg :=
⟨s, rfl⟩
theorem fg_def {S : subalgebra R A} : S.fg ↔ ∃ t : set A, set.finite t ∧ algebra.adjoin R t = S :=
⟨λ ⟨t, ht⟩, ⟨↑t, set.finite_mem_finset t, ht⟩,
λ ⟨t, ht1, ht2⟩, ⟨ht1.to_finset, by rwa set.finite.coe_to_finset⟩⟩
theorem fg_bot : (⊥ : subalgebra R A).fg :=
⟨∅, algebra.adjoin_empty R A⟩
theorem fg_of_fg_to_submodule {S : subalgebra R A} : S.to_submodule.fg → S.fg :=
λ ⟨t, ht⟩, ⟨t, le_antisymm
(algebra.adjoin_le (λ x hx, show x ∈ S.to_submodule, from ht ▸ subset_span hx)) $
show S.to_submodule ≤ (algebra.adjoin R ↑t).to_submodule,
from (λ x hx, span_le.mpr
(λ x hx, algebra.subset_adjoin hx)
(show x ∈ span R ↑t, by { rw ht, exact hx }))⟩
theorem fg_of_noetherian [is_noetherian R A] (S : subalgebra R A) : S.fg :=
fg_of_fg_to_submodule (is_noetherian.noetherian S.to_submodule)
lemma fg_of_submodule_fg (h : (⊤ : submodule R A).fg) : (⊤ : subalgebra R A).fg :=
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := h in ⟨s, to_submodule_injective $
by { rw [algebra.top_to_submodule, eq_top_iff, ← hs, span_le], exact algebra.subset_adjoin }⟩
section
open_locale classical
lemma fg_map (S : subalgebra R A) (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (hs : S.fg) : (S.map f).fg :=
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := hs in ⟨s.image f, by rw [finset.coe_image, algebra.adjoin_image, hs]⟩
end
lemma fg_of_fg_map (S : subalgebra R A) (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (hf : function.injective f)
(hs : (S.map f).fg) : S.fg :=
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := hs in ⟨s.preimage f $ λ _ _ _ _ h, hf h, map_injective f hf $
by { rw [← algebra.adjoin_image, finset.coe_preimage, set.image_preimage_eq_of_subset, hs],
rw [← alg_hom.coe_range, ← algebra.adjoin_le_iff, hs, ← algebra.map_top], exact map_mono le_top }⟩
lemma fg_top (S : subalgebra R A) : (⊤ : subalgebra R S).fg ↔ S.fg :=
⟨λ h, by { rw [← S.range_val, ← algebra.map_top], exact fg_map _ _ h },
λ h, fg_of_fg_map _ S.val subtype.val_injective $ by { rw [algebra.map_top, range_val], exact h }⟩
lemma induction_on_adjoin [is_noetherian R A] (P : subalgebra R A → Prop)
(base : P ⊥) (ih : ∀ (S : subalgebra R A) (x : A), P S → P (algebra.adjoin R (insert x S)))
(S : subalgebra R A) : P S :=
begin
classical,
obtain ⟨t, rfl⟩ := S.fg_of_noetherian,
refine finset.induction_on t _ _,
{ simpa using base },
intros x t hxt h,
convert ih _ x h using 1,
rw [finset.coe_insert, algebra.adjoin_insert_adjoin]
end
end subalgebra
variables {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w}
variables [comm_ring R] [comm_ring A] [comm_ring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B]
/-- The image of a Noetherian R-algebra under an R-algebra map is a Noetherian ring. -/
instance alg_hom.is_noetherian_ring_range (f : A →ₐ[R] B) [is_noetherian_ring A] :
is_noetherian_ring f.range :=
is_noetherian_ring_range f.to_ring_hom
theorem is_noetherian_ring_of_fg {S : subalgebra R A} (HS : S.fg)
[is_noetherian_ring R] : is_noetherian_ring S :=
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := HS in ht ▸ (algebra.adjoin_eq_range R (↑t : set A)).symm ▸
by haveI : is_noetherian_ring (mv_polynomial (↑t : set A) R) :=
mv_polynomial.is_noetherian_ring;
convert alg_hom.is_noetherian_ring_range _; apply_instance
theorem is_noetherian_ring_closure (s : set R) (hs : s.finite) :
@@is_noetherian_ring (ring.closure s) subset.ring :=
show is_noetherian_ring (subalgebra_of_is_subring (ring.closure s)), from
algebra.adjoin_int s ▸ is_noetherian_ring_of_fg (subalgebra.fg_def.2 ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩)
|
711d6ab5a09289e29abce5c31ba28c7c7066d1bf | 95a0255955cf617fa80fca1ebb7cb4864f620075 | /move_to_lib.hlean | 990567aba9b3e81fff13e80c02abef8132916a47 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | xuanYang/Spectral | 1df58d41745b2103c2eb7fddfb5e86652343327d | af30b19099a6e28a1b989c26c0603f1ff52a1367 | refs/heads/master | 1,624,752,891,749 | 1,504,812,124,000 | 1,504,812,124,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 41,228 | hlean | -- definitions, theorems and attributes which should be moved to files in the HoTT library
import homotopy.sphere2 homotopy.cofiber homotopy.wedge hit.prop_trunc hit.set_quotient eq2 types.pointed2
open eq nat int susp pointed sigma is_equiv equiv fiber algebra trunc pi group
is_trunc function unit prod bool
attribute pType.sigma_char sigma_pi_equiv_pi_sigma sigma.coind_unc [constructor]
attribute ap1_gen [unfold 8 9 10]
attribute ap010 [unfold 7]
-- TODO: homotopy_of_eq and apd10 should be the same
-- TODO: there is also apd10_eq_of_homotopy in both pi and eq(?)
namespace eq
definition apd10_prepostcompose_nondep {A B C D : Type} (h : C → D) {g g' : B → C} (p : g = g')
(f : A → B) (a : A) : apd10 (ap (λg a, h (g (f a))) p) a = ap h (apd10 p (f a)) :=
begin induction p, reflexivity end
definition apd10_prepostcompose {A B : Type} {C : B → Type} {D : A → Type}
(f : A → B) (h : Πa, C (f a) → D a) {g g' : Πb, C b}
(p : g = g') (a : A) :
apd10 (ap (λg a, h a (g (f a))) p) a = ap (h a) (apd10 p (f a)) :=
begin induction p, reflexivity end
definition eq.rec_to {A : Type} {a₀ : A} {P : Π⦃a₁⦄, a₀ = a₁ → Type}
{a₁ : A} (p₀ : a₀ = a₁) (H : P p₀) ⦃a₂ : A⦄ (p : a₀ = a₂) : P p :=
begin
induction p₀, induction p, exact H
end
definition eq.rec_to2 {A : Type} {P : Π⦃a₀ a₁⦄, a₀ = a₁ → Type}
{a₀ a₀' a₁' : A} (p' : a₀' = a₁') (p₀ : a₀ = a₀') (H : P p') ⦃a₁ : A⦄ (p : a₀ = a₁) : P p :=
begin
induction p₀, induction p', induction p, exact H
end
definition eq.rec_right_inv {A : Type} (f : A ≃ A) {P : Π⦃a₀ a₁⦄, f a₀ = a₁ → Type}
(H : Πa, P (right_inv f a)) ⦃a₀ a₁ : A⦄ (p : f a₀ = a₁) : P p :=
begin
revert a₀ p, refine equiv_rect f⁻¹ᵉ _ _,
intro a₀ p, exact eq.rec_to (right_inv f a₀) (H a₀) p,
end
definition eq.rec_equiv {A B : Type} {a₀ : A} (f : A ≃ B) {P : Π{a₁}, f a₀ = f a₁ → Type}
(H : P (idpath (f a₀))) ⦃a₁ : A⦄ (p : f a₀ = f a₁) : P p :=
begin
assert qr : Σ(q : a₀ = a₁), ap f q = p,
{ exact ⟨eq_of_fn_eq_fn f p, ap_eq_of_fn_eq_fn' f p⟩ },
cases qr with q r, apply transport P r, induction q, exact H
end
definition eq.rec_equiv_symm {A B : Type} {a₁ : A} (f : A ≃ B) {P : Π{a₀}, f a₀ = f a₁ → Type}
(H : P (idpath (f a₁))) ⦃a₀ : A⦄ (p : f a₀ = f a₁) : P p :=
begin
assert qr : Σ(q : a₀ = a₁), ap f q = p,
{ exact ⟨eq_of_fn_eq_fn f p, ap_eq_of_fn_eq_fn' f p⟩ },
cases qr with q r, apply transport P r, induction q, exact H
end
definition eq.rec_equiv_to_same {A B : Type} {a₀ : A} (f : A ≃ B) {P : Π{a₁}, f a₀ = f a₁ → Type}
⦃a₁' : A⦄ (p' : f a₀ = f a₁') (H : P p') ⦃a₁ : A⦄ (p : f a₀ = f a₁) : P p :=
begin
revert a₁' p' H a₁ p,
refine eq.rec_equiv f _,
exact eq.rec_equiv f
end
definition eq.rec_equiv_to {A A' B : Type} {a₀ : A} (f : A ≃ B) (g : A' ≃ B)
{P : Π{a₁}, f a₀ = g a₁ → Type}
⦃a₁' : A'⦄ (p' : f a₀ = g a₁') (H : P p') ⦃a₁ : A'⦄ (p : f a₀ = g a₁) : P p :=
begin
assert qr : Σ(q : g⁻¹ (f a₀) = a₁), (right_inv g (f a₀))⁻¹ ⬝ ap g q = p,
{ exact ⟨eq_of_fn_eq_fn g (right_inv g (f a₀) ⬝ p),
whisker_left _ (ap_eq_of_fn_eq_fn' g _) ⬝ !inv_con_cancel_left⟩ },
assert q'r' : Σ(q' : g⁻¹ (f a₀) = a₁'), (right_inv g (f a₀))⁻¹ ⬝ ap g q' = p',
{ exact ⟨eq_of_fn_eq_fn g (right_inv g (f a₀) ⬝ p'),
whisker_left _ (ap_eq_of_fn_eq_fn' g _) ⬝ !inv_con_cancel_left⟩ },
induction qr with q r, induction q'r' with q' r',
induction q, induction q',
induction r, induction r',
exact H
end
definition eq.rec_grading {A A' B : Type} {a : A} (f : A ≃ B) (g : A' ≃ B)
{P : Π{b}, f a = b → Type}
{a' : A'} (p' : f a = g a') (H : P p') ⦃b : B⦄ (p : f a = b) : P p :=
begin
revert b p, refine equiv_rect g _ _,
exact eq.rec_equiv_to f g p' H
end
definition eq.rec_grading_unbased {A B B' C : Type} (f : A ≃ B) (g : B ≃ C) (h : B' ≃ C)
{P : Π{b c}, g b = c → Type}
{a' : A} {b' : B'} (p' : g (f a') = h b') (H : P p') ⦃b : B⦄ ⦃c : C⦄ (q : f a' = b)
(p : g b = c) : P p :=
begin
induction q, exact eq.rec_grading (f ⬝e g) h p' H p
end
-- definition homotopy_group_homomorphism_pinv (n : ℕ) {A B : Type*} (f : A ≃* B) :
-- π→g[n+1] f⁻¹ᵉ* ~ (homotopy_group_isomorphism_of_pequiv n f)⁻¹ᵍ :=
-- begin
-- -- refine ptrunc_functor_phomotopy 0 !apn_pinv ⬝hty _,
-- -- intro x, esimp,
-- end
-- definition natural_square_tr_eq {A B : Type} {a a' : A} {f g : A → B}
-- (p : f ~ g) (q : a = a') : natural_square p q = square_of_pathover (apd p q) :=
-- idp
lemma homotopy_group_isomorphism_of_ptrunc_pequiv {A B : Type*}
(n k : ℕ) (H : n+1 ≤[ℕ] k) (f : ptrunc k A ≃* ptrunc k B) : πg[n+1] A ≃g πg[n+1] B :=
(ghomotopy_group_ptrunc_of_le H A)⁻¹ᵍ ⬝g
homotopy_group_isomorphism_of_pequiv n f ⬝g
ghomotopy_group_ptrunc_of_le H B
section hsquare
variables {A₀₀ A₂₀ A₄₀ A₀₂ A₂₂ A₄₂ A₀₄ A₂₄ A₄₄ : Type}
{f₁₀ : A₀₀ → A₂₀} {f₃₀ : A₂₀ → A₄₀}
{f₀₁ : A₀₀ → A₀₂} {f₂₁ : A₂₀ → A₂₂} {f₄₁ : A₄₀ → A₄₂}
{f₁₂ : A₀₂ → A₂₂} {f₃₂ : A₂₂ → A₄₂}
{f₀₃ : A₀₂ → A₀₄} {f₂₃ : A₂₂ → A₂₄} {f₄₃ : A₄₂ → A₄₄}
{f₁₄ : A₀₄ → A₂₄} {f₃₄ : A₂₄ → A₄₄}
definition trunc_functor_hsquare (n : ℕ₋₂) (h : hsquare f₁₀ f₁₂ f₀₁ f₂₁) :
hsquare (trunc_functor n f₁₀) (trunc_functor n f₁₂)
(trunc_functor n f₀₁) (trunc_functor n f₂₁) :=
λa, !trunc_functor_compose⁻¹ ⬝ trunc_functor_homotopy n h a ⬝ !trunc_functor_compose
attribute hhconcat hvconcat [unfold_full]
definition rfl_hhconcat (q : hsquare f₃₀ f₃₂ f₂₁ f₄₁) : homotopy.rfl ⬝htyh q ~ q :=
homotopy.rfl
definition hhconcat_rfl (q : hsquare f₃₀ f₃₂ f₂₁ f₄₁) : q ⬝htyh homotopy.rfl ~ q :=
λx, !idp_con ⬝ ap_id (q x)
definition rfl_hvconcat (q : hsquare f₃₀ f₃₂ f₂₁ f₄₁) : homotopy.rfl ⬝htyv q ~ q :=
λx, !idp_con
definition hvconcat_rfl (q : hsquare f₃₀ f₃₂ f₂₁ f₄₁) : q ⬝htyv homotopy.rfl ~ q :=
λx, !ap_id
end hsquare
definition homotopy_group_succ_in_natural (n : ℕ) {A B : Type*} (f : A →* B) :
hsquare (homotopy_group_succ_in A n) (homotopy_group_succ_in B n) (π→[n+1] f) (π→[n] (Ω→ f)) :=
trunc_functor_hsquare _ (loopn_succ_in_natural n f)⁻¹*
definition homotopy2.refl {A} {B : A → Type} {C : Π⦃a⦄, B a → Type} (f : Πa (b : B a), C b) :
f ~2 f :=
λa b, idp
definition homotopy2.rfl [refl] {A} {B : A → Type} {C : Π⦃a⦄, B a → Type}
{f : Πa (b : B a), C b} : f ~2 f :=
λa b, idp
definition homotopy3.refl {A} {B : A → Type} {C : Πa, B a → Type}
{D : Π⦃a⦄ ⦃b : B a⦄, C a b → Type} (f : Πa b (c : C a b), D c) : f ~3 f :=
λa b c, idp
definition homotopy3.rfl {A} {B : A → Type} {C : Πa, B a → Type}
{D : Π⦃a⦄ ⦃b : B a⦄, C a b → Type} {f : Πa b (c : C a b), D c} : f ~3 f :=
λa b c, idp
definition eq_tr_of_pathover_con_tr_eq_of_pathover {A : Type} {B : A → Type}
{a₁ a₂ : A} (p : a₁ = a₂) {b₁ : B a₁} {b₂ : B a₂} (q : b₁ =[p] b₂) :
eq_tr_of_pathover q ⬝ tr_eq_of_pathover q⁻¹ᵒ = idp :=
by induction q; reflexivity
end eq open eq
namespace nat
protected definition rec_down (P : ℕ → Type) (s : ℕ) (H0 : P s) (Hs : Πn, P (n+1) → P n) : P 0 :=
have Hp : Πn, P n → P (pred n),
begin
intro n p, cases n with n,
{ exact p },
{ exact Hs n p }
end,
have H : Πn, P (s - n),
begin
intro n, induction n with n p,
{ exact H0 },
{ exact Hp (s - n) p }
end,
transport P (nat.sub_self s) (H s)
end nat
namespace trunc_index
open is_conn nat trunc is_trunc
lemma minus_two_add_plus_two (n : ℕ₋₂) : -2+2+n = n :=
by induction n with n p; reflexivity; exact ap succ p
protected definition of_nat_monotone {n k : ℕ} : n ≤ k → of_nat n ≤ of_nat k :=
begin
intro H, induction H with k H K,
{ apply le.tr_refl },
{ apply le.step K }
end
lemma add_plus_two_comm (n k : ℕ₋₂) : n +2+ k = k +2+ n :=
begin
induction n with n IH,
{ exact minus_two_add_plus_two k },
{ exact !succ_add_plus_two ⬝ ap succ IH}
end
end trunc_index
namespace int
private definition maxm2_le.lemma₁ {n k : ℕ} : n+(1:int) + -[1+ k] ≤ n :=
le.intro (
calc n + 1 + -[1+ k] + k
= n + 1 + (-(k + 1)) + k : by reflexivity
... = n + 1 + (- 1 - k) + k : by krewrite (neg_add_rev k 1)
... = n + 1 + (- 1 - k + k) : add.assoc
... = n + 1 + (- 1 + -k + k) : by reflexivity
... = n + 1 + (- 1 + (-k + k)) : add.assoc
... = n + 1 + (- 1 + 0) : add.left_inv
... = n + (1 + (- 1 + 0)) : add.assoc
... = n : int.add_zero)
private definition maxm2_le.lemma₂ {n : ℕ} {k : ℤ} : -[1+ n] + 1 + k ≤ k :=
le.intro (
calc -[1+ n] + 1 + k + n
= - (n + 1) + 1 + k + n : by reflexivity
... = -n - 1 + 1 + k + n : by rewrite (neg_add n 1)
... = -n + (- 1 + 1) + k + n : by krewrite (int.add_assoc (-n) (- 1) 1)
... = -n + 0 + k + n : add.left_inv 1
... = -n + k + n : int.add_zero
... = k + -n + n : int.add_comm
... = k + (-n + n) : int.add_assoc
... = k + 0 : add.left_inv n
... = k : int.add_zero)
open trunc_index
/-
The function from integers to truncation indices which sends
positive numbers to themselves, and negative numbers to negative
2. In particular -1 is sent to -2, but since we only work with
pointed types, that doesn't matter for us -/
definition maxm2 [unfold 1] : ℤ → ℕ₋₂ :=
λ n, int.cases_on n trunc_index.of_nat (λk, -2)
-- we also need the max -1 - function
definition maxm1 [unfold 1] : ℤ → ℕ₋₂ :=
λ n, int.cases_on n trunc_index.of_nat (λk, -1)
definition maxm2_le_maxm1 (n : ℤ) : maxm2 n ≤ maxm1 n :=
begin
induction n with n n,
{ exact le.tr_refl n },
{ exact minus_two_le -1 }
end
-- the is maxm1 minus 1
definition maxm1m1 [unfold 1] : ℤ → ℕ₋₂ :=
λ n, int.cases_on n (λ k, k.-1) (λ k, -2)
definition maxm1_eq_succ (n : ℤ) : maxm1 n = (maxm1m1 n).+1 :=
begin
induction n with n n,
{ reflexivity },
{ reflexivity }
end
definition maxm2_le_maxm0 (n : ℤ) : maxm2 n ≤ max0 n :=
begin
induction n with n n,
{ exact le.tr_refl n },
{ exact minus_two_le 0 }
end
definition max0_le_of_le {n : ℤ} {m : ℕ} (H : n ≤ of_nat m)
: nat.le (max0 n) m :=
begin
induction n with n n,
{ exact le_of_of_nat_le_of_nat H },
{ exact nat.zero_le m }
end
definition not_neg_succ_le_of_nat {n m : ℕ} : ¬m ≤ -[1+n] :=
by cases m: exact id
definition maxm2_monotone {n m : ℤ} (H : n ≤ m) : maxm2 n ≤ maxm2 m :=
begin
induction n with n n,
{ induction m with m m,
{ apply of_nat_le_of_nat, exact le_of_of_nat_le_of_nat H },
{ exfalso, exact not_neg_succ_le_of_nat H }},
{ apply minus_two_le }
end
definition sub_nat_le (n : ℤ) (m : ℕ) : n - m ≤ n :=
le.intro !sub_add_cancel
definition sub_one_le (n : ℤ) : n - 1 ≤ n :=
sub_nat_le n 1
definition le_add_nat (n : ℤ) (m : ℕ) : n ≤ n + m :=
le.intro rfl
definition le_add_one (n : ℤ) : n ≤ n + 1:=
le_add_nat n 1
open trunc_index
definition maxm2_le (n k : ℤ) : maxm2 (n+1+k) ≤ (maxm1m1 n).+1+2+(maxm1m1 k) :=
begin
rewrite [-(maxm1_eq_succ n)],
induction n with n n,
{ induction k with k k,
{ induction k with k IH,
{ apply le.tr_refl },
{ exact succ_le_succ IH } },
{ exact trunc_index.le_trans (maxm2_monotone maxm2_le.lemma₁)
(maxm2_le_maxm1 n) } },
{ krewrite (add_plus_two_comm -1 (maxm1m1 k)),
rewrite [-(maxm1_eq_succ k)],
exact trunc_index.le_trans (maxm2_monotone maxm2_le.lemma₂)
(maxm2_le_maxm1 k) }
end
end int open int
namespace pmap
/- rename: pmap_eta in namespace pointed -/
definition eta {A B : Type*} (f : A →* B) : pmap.mk f (respect_pt f) = f :=
begin induction f, reflexivity end
end pmap
namespace lift
definition is_trunc_plift [instance] [priority 1450] (A : Type*) (n : ℕ₋₂)
[H : is_trunc n A] : is_trunc n (plift A) :=
is_trunc_lift A n
end lift
namespace trunc
open trunc_index
definition trunc_index_equiv_nat [constructor] : ℕ₋₂ ≃ ℕ :=
equiv.MK add_two sub_two add_two_sub_two sub_two_add_two
definition is_set_trunc_index [instance] : is_set ℕ₋₂ :=
is_trunc_equiv_closed_rev 0 trunc_index_equiv_nat
definition is_contr_ptrunc_minus_one (A : Type*) : is_contr (ptrunc -1 A) :=
is_contr_of_inhabited_prop pt
-- TODO: redefine loopn_ptrunc_pequiv
definition apn_ptrunc_functor (n : ℕ₋₂) (k : ℕ) {A B : Type*} (f : A →* B) :
Ω→[k] (ptrunc_functor (n+k) f) ∘* (loopn_ptrunc_pequiv n k A)⁻¹ᵉ* ~*
(loopn_ptrunc_pequiv n k B)⁻¹ᵉ* ∘* ptrunc_functor n (Ω→[k] f) :=
begin
revert n, induction k with k IH: intro n,
{ reflexivity },
{ exact sorry }
end
definition ptrunc_pequiv_natural [constructor] (n : ℕ₋₂) {A B : Type*} (f : A →* B) [is_trunc n A]
[is_trunc n B] : f ∘* ptrunc_pequiv n A ~* ptrunc_pequiv n B ∘* ptrunc_functor n f :=
begin
fapply phomotopy.mk,
{ intro a, induction a with a, reflexivity },
{ refine !idp_con ⬝ _ ⬝ !idp_con⁻¹, refine !ap_compose'⁻¹ ⬝ _, apply ap_id }
end
definition ptr_natural [constructor] (n : ℕ₋₂) {A B : Type*} (f : A →* B) :
ptrunc_functor n f ∘* ptr n A ~* ptr n B ∘* f :=
begin
fapply phomotopy.mk,
{ intro a, reflexivity },
{ reflexivity }
end
definition ptrunc_elim_pcompose (n : ℕ₋₂) {A B C : Type*} (g : B →* C) (f : A →* B) [is_trunc n B]
[is_trunc n C] : ptrunc.elim n (g ∘* f) ~* g ∘* ptrunc.elim n f :=
begin
fapply phomotopy.mk,
{ intro a, induction a with a, reflexivity },
{ apply idp_con }
end
definition ptrunc_elim_ptr_phomotopy_pid (n : ℕ₋₂) (A : Type*):
ptrunc.elim n (ptr n A) ~* pid (ptrunc n A) :=
begin
fapply phomotopy.mk,
{ intro a, induction a with a, reflexivity },
{ apply idp_con }
end
definition is_trunc_ptrunc_of_is_trunc [instance] [priority 500] (A : Type*)
(n m : ℕ₋₂) [H : is_trunc n A] : is_trunc n (ptrunc m A) :=
is_trunc_trunc_of_is_trunc A n m
definition ptrunc_pequiv_ptrunc_of_is_trunc {n m k : ℕ₋₂} {A : Type*}
(H1 : n ≤ m) (H2 : n ≤ k) (H : is_trunc n A) : ptrunc m A ≃* ptrunc k A :=
have is_trunc m A, from is_trunc_of_le A H1,
have is_trunc k A, from is_trunc_of_le A H2,
pequiv.MK (ptrunc.elim _ (ptr k A)) (ptrunc.elim _ (ptr m A))
abstract begin
refine !ptrunc_elim_pcompose⁻¹* ⬝* _,
exact ptrunc_elim_phomotopy _ !ptrunc_elim_ptr ⬝* !ptrunc_elim_ptr_phomotopy_pid,
end end
abstract begin
refine !ptrunc_elim_pcompose⁻¹* ⬝* _,
exact ptrunc_elim_phomotopy _ !ptrunc_elim_ptr ⬝* !ptrunc_elim_ptr_phomotopy_pid,
end end
definition ptrunc_change_index {k l : ℕ₋₂} (p : k = l) (X : Type*)
: ptrunc k X ≃* ptrunc l X :=
pequiv_ap (λ n, ptrunc n X) p
definition ptrunc_functor_le {k l : ℕ₋₂} (p : l ≤ k) (X : Type*)
: ptrunc k X →* ptrunc l X :=
have is_trunc k (ptrunc l X), from is_trunc_of_le _ p,
ptrunc.elim _ (ptr l X)
definition trunc_index.pred [unfold 1] (n : ℕ₋₂) : ℕ₋₂ :=
begin cases n with n, exact -2, exact n end
/- A more general version of ptrunc_elim_phomotopy, where the proofs of truncatedness might be different -/
definition ptrunc_elim_phomotopy2 [constructor] (k : ℕ₋₂) {A B : Type*} {f g : A →* B} (H₁ : is_trunc k B)
(H₂ : is_trunc k B) (p : f ~* g) : @ptrunc.elim k A B H₁ f ~* @ptrunc.elim k A B H₂ g :=
begin
fapply phomotopy.mk,
{ intro x, induction x with a, exact p a },
{ exact to_homotopy_pt p }
end
end trunc
namespace is_trunc
open trunc_index is_conn
definition is_trunc_of_eq {n m : ℕ₋₂} (p : n = m) {A : Type} (H : is_trunc n A) : is_trunc m A :=
transport (λk, is_trunc k A) p H
definition is_trunc_succ_succ_of_is_trunc_loop (n : ℕ₋₂) (A : Type*) (H : is_trunc (n.+1) (Ω A))
(H2 : is_conn 0 A) : is_trunc (n.+2) A :=
begin
apply is_trunc_succ_of_is_trunc_loop, apply minus_one_le_succ,
refine is_conn.elim -1 _ _, exact H
end
lemma is_trunc_of_is_trunc_loopn (m n : ℕ) (A : Type*) (H : is_trunc n (Ω[m] A))
(H2 : is_conn m A) : is_trunc (m + n) A :=
begin
revert A H H2; induction m with m IH: intro A H H2,
{ rewrite [nat.zero_add], exact H },
rewrite [succ_add],
apply is_trunc_succ_succ_of_is_trunc_loop,
{ apply IH,
{ apply is_trunc_equiv_closed _ !loopn_succ_in },
apply is_conn_loop },
exact is_conn_of_le _ (zero_le_of_nat (succ m))
end
lemma is_trunc_of_is_set_loopn (m : ℕ) (A : Type*) (H : is_set (Ω[m] A))
(H2 : is_conn m A) : is_trunc m A :=
is_trunc_of_is_trunc_loopn m 0 A H H2
end is_trunc
namespace sigma
open sigma.ops
definition sigma_eq_equiv_of_is_prop_right [constructor] {A : Type} {B : A → Type} (u v : Σa, B a)
[H : Π a, is_prop (B a)] : u = v ≃ u.1 = v.1 :=
!sigma_eq_equiv ⬝e !sigma_equiv_of_is_contr_right
definition ap_sigma_pr1 {A B : Type} {C : B → Type} {a₁ a₂ : A} (f : A → B) (g : Πa, C (f a))
(p : a₁ = a₂) : (ap (λa, ⟨f a, g a⟩) p)..1 = ap f p :=
by induction p; reflexivity
definition ap_sigma_pr2 {A B : Type} {C : B → Type} {a₁ a₂ : A} (f : A → B) (g : Πa, C (f a))
(p : a₁ = a₂) : (ap (λa, ⟨f a, g a⟩) p)..2 =
change_path (ap_sigma_pr1 f g p)⁻¹ (pathover_ap C f (apd g p)) :=
by induction p; reflexivity
-- open sigma.ops
-- definition eq.rec_sigma {A : Type} {B : A → Type} {a₀ : A} {b₀ : B a₀}
-- {P : Π(a : A) (b : B a), ⟨a₀, b₀⟩ = ⟨a, b⟩ → Type} (H : P a₀ b₀ idp) {a : A} {b : B a}
-- (p : ⟨a₀, b₀⟩ = ⟨a, b⟩) : P a b p :=
-- sorry
-- definition sigma_pathover_equiv_of_is_prop {A : Type} {B : A → Type} {C : Πa, B a → Type}
-- {a a' : A} {p : a = a'} {b : B a} {b' : B a'} {c : C a b} {c' : C a' b'}
-- [Πa b, is_prop (C a b)] : ⟨b, c⟩ =[p] ⟨b', c'⟩ ≃ b =[p] b' :=
-- begin
-- fapply equiv.MK,
-- { exact pathover_pr1 },
-- { intro q, induction q, apply pathover_idp_of_eq, exact sigma_eq idp !is_prop.elimo },
-- { intro q, induction q,
-- have c = c', from !is_prop.elim, induction this,
-- rewrite [▸*, is_prop_elimo_self (C a) c] },
-- { esimp, generalize ⟨b, c⟩, intro x q, }
-- end
--rexact @(ap pathover_pr1) _ idpo _,
end sigma open sigma
namespace group
-- definition is_equiv_isomorphism
-- some extra instances for type class inference
-- definition is_mul_hom_comm_homomorphism [instance] {G G' : AbGroup} (φ : G →g G')
-- : @is_mul_hom G G' (@ab_group.to_group _ (AbGroup.struct G))
-- (@ab_group.to_group _ (AbGroup.struct G')) φ :=
-- homomorphism.struct φ
-- definition is_mul_hom_comm_homomorphism1 [instance] {G G' : AbGroup} (φ : G →g G')
-- : @is_mul_hom G G' _
-- (@ab_group.to_group _ (AbGroup.struct G')) φ :=
-- homomorphism.struct φ
-- definition is_mul_hom_comm_homomorphism2 [instance] {G G' : AbGroup} (φ : G →g G')
-- : @is_mul_hom G G' (@ab_group.to_group _ (AbGroup.struct G)) _ φ :=
-- homomorphism.struct φ
definition pgroup_of_Group (X : Group) : pgroup X :=
pgroup_of_group _ idp
definition isomorphism_ap {A : Type} (F : A → Group) {a b : A} (p : a = b) : F a ≃g F b :=
isomorphism_of_eq (ap F p)
definition interchange (G : AbGroup) (a b c d : G) : (a * b) * (c * d) = (a * c) * (b * d) :=
calc (a * b) * (c * d) = a * (b * (c * d)) : by exact mul.assoc a b (c * d)
... = a * ((b * c) * d) : by exact ap (λ bcd, a * bcd) (mul.assoc b c d)⁻¹
... = a * ((c * b) * d) : by exact ap (λ bc, a * (bc * d)) (mul.comm b c)
... = a * (c * (b * d)) : by exact ap (λ bcd, a * bcd) (mul.assoc c b d)
... = (a * c) * (b * d) : by exact (mul.assoc a c (b * d))⁻¹
definition homomorphism_comp_compute {G H K : Group} (g : H →g K) (f : G →g H) (x : G) : (g ∘g f) x = g (f x) :=
begin
reflexivity
end
open option
definition add_point_AbGroup [unfold 3] {X : Type} (G : X → AbGroup) : X₊ → AbGroup
| (some x) := G x
| none := trivial_ab_group_lift
definition isomorphism_of_is_contr {G H : Group} (hG : is_contr G) (hH : is_contr H) : G ≃g H :=
trivial_group_of_is_contr G ⬝g (trivial_group_of_is_contr H)⁻¹ᵍ
definition trunc_isomorphism_of_equiv {A B : Type} [inf_group A] [inf_group B] (f : A ≃ B)
(h : is_mul_hom f) : Group.mk (trunc 0 A) (trunc_group A) ≃g Group.mk (trunc 0 B) (trunc_group B) :=
begin
apply isomorphism_of_equiv (equiv.mk (trunc_functor 0 f) (is_equiv_trunc_functor 0 f)), intros x x',
induction x with a, induction x' with a', apply ap tr, exact h a a'
end
end group open group
namespace fiber
definition is_contr_pfiber_pid (A : Type*) : is_contr (pfiber (pid A)) :=
is_contr.mk pt begin intro x, induction x with a p, esimp at p, cases p, reflexivity end
end fiber
namespace function
variables {A B : Type} {f f' : A → B}
open is_conn sigma.ops
definition merely_constant {A B : Type} (f : A → B) : Type :=
Σb, Πa, merely (f a = b)
definition merely_constant_pmap {A B : Type*} {f : A →* B} (H : merely_constant f) (a : A) :
merely (f a = pt) :=
tconcat (tconcat (H.2 a) (tinverse (H.2 pt))) (tr (respect_pt f))
definition merely_constant_of_is_conn {A B : Type*} (f : A →* B) [is_conn 0 A] : merely_constant f :=
⟨pt, is_conn.elim -1 _ (tr (respect_pt f))⟩
definition homotopy_group_isomorphism_of_is_embedding (n : ℕ) [H : is_succ n] {A B : Type*}
(f : A →* B) [H2 : is_embedding f] : πg[n] A ≃g πg[n] B :=
begin
apply isomorphism.mk (homotopy_group_homomorphism n f),
induction H with n,
apply is_equiv_of_equiv_of_homotopy
(ptrunc_pequiv_ptrunc 0 (loopn_pequiv_loopn_of_is_embedding (n+1) f)),
exact sorry
end
end function open function
namespace is_conn
open unit trunc_index nat is_trunc pointed.ops
definition is_conn_zero {A : Type} (a₀ : trunc 0 A) (p : Πa a' : A, ∥ a = a' ∥) : is_conn 0 A :=
is_conn_succ_intro a₀ (λa a', is_conn_minus_one _ (p a a'))
definition is_conn_zero_pointed {A : Type*} (p : Πa a' : A, ∥ a = a' ∥) : is_conn 0 A :=
is_conn_zero (tr pt) p
definition is_conn_fiber (n : ℕ₋₂) {A B : Type} (f : A → B) (b : B) [is_conn n A] [is_conn (n.+1) B] :
is_conn n (fiber f b) :=
is_conn_equiv_closed_rev _ !fiber.sigma_char _
definition is_conn_fun_compose {n : ℕ₋₂} {A B C : Type} (g : B → C) (f : A → B)
(H : is_conn_fun n g) (K : is_conn_fun n f) : is_conn_fun n (g ∘ f) :=
sorry
end is_conn
namespace misc
open is_conn
open sigma.ops pointed trunc_index
definition component [constructor] (A : Type*) : Type* :=
pType.mk (Σ(a : A), merely (pt = a)) ⟨pt, tr idp⟩
lemma is_conn_component [instance] (A : Type*) : is_conn 0 (component A) :=
is_contr.mk (tr pt)
begin
intro x, induction x with x, induction x with a p, induction p with p, induction p, reflexivity
end
definition component_incl [constructor] (A : Type*) : component A →* A :=
pmap.mk pr1 idp
definition is_embedding_component_incl [instance] (A : Type*) : is_embedding (component_incl A) :=
is_embedding_pr1 _
definition component_intro [constructor] {A B : Type*} (f : A →* B) (H : merely_constant f) :
A →* component B :=
begin
fapply pmap.mk,
{ intro a, refine ⟨f a, _⟩, exact tinverse (merely_constant_pmap H a) },
exact subtype_eq !respect_pt
end
definition component_functor [constructor] {A B : Type*} (f : A →* B) : component A →* component B :=
component_intro (f ∘* component_incl A) !merely_constant_of_is_conn
-- definition component_elim [constructor] {A B : Type*} (f : A →* B) (H : merely_constant f) :
-- A →* component B :=
-- begin
-- fapply pmap.mk,
-- { intro a, refine ⟨f a, _⟩, exact tinverse (merely_constant_pmap H a) },
-- exact subtype_eq !respect_pt
-- end
definition loop_component (A : Type*) : Ω (component A) ≃* Ω A :=
loop_pequiv_loop_of_is_embedding (component_incl A)
lemma loopn_component (n : ℕ) (A : Type*) : Ω[n+1] (component A) ≃* Ω[n+1] A :=
!loopn_succ_in ⬝e* loopn_pequiv_loopn n (loop_component A) ⬝e* !loopn_succ_in⁻¹ᵉ*
-- lemma fundamental_group_component (A : Type*) : π₁ (component A) ≃g π₁ A :=
-- isomorphism_of_equiv (trunc_equiv_trunc 0 (loop_component A)) _
lemma homotopy_group_component (n : ℕ) (A : Type*) : πg[n+1] (component A) ≃g πg[n+1] A :=
homotopy_group_isomorphism_of_is_embedding (n+1) (component_incl A)
definition is_trunc_component [instance] (n : ℕ₋₂) (A : Type*) [is_trunc n A] :
is_trunc n (component A) :=
begin
apply @is_trunc_sigma, intro a, cases n with n,
{ apply is_contr_of_inhabited_prop, exact tr !is_prop.elim },
{ apply is_trunc_succ_of_is_prop },
end
definition ptrunc_component' (n : ℕ₋₂) (A : Type*) :
ptrunc (n.+2) (component A) ≃* component (ptrunc (n.+2) A) :=
begin
fapply pequiv.MK',
{ exact ptrunc.elim (n.+2) (component_functor !ptr) },
{ intro x, cases x with x p, induction x with a,
refine tr ⟨a, _⟩,
note q := trunc_functor -1 !tr_eq_tr_equiv p,
exact trunc_trunc_equiv_left _ !minus_one_le_succ q },
{ exact sorry },
{ exact sorry }
end
definition ptrunc_component (n : ℕ₋₂) (A : Type*) :
ptrunc n (component A) ≃* component (ptrunc n A) :=
begin
cases n with n, exact sorry,
cases n with n, exact sorry,
exact ptrunc_component' n A
end
definition break_into_components (A : Type) : A ≃ Σ(x : trunc 0 A), Σ(a : A), ∥ tr a = x ∥ :=
calc
A ≃ Σ(a : A) (x : trunc 0 A), tr a = x :
by exact (@sigma_equiv_of_is_contr_right _ _ (λa, !is_contr_sigma_eq))⁻¹ᵉ
... ≃ Σ(x : trunc 0 A) (a : A), tr a = x :
by apply sigma_comm_equiv
... ≃ Σ(x : trunc 0 A), Σ(a : A), ∥ tr a = x ∥ :
by exact sigma_equiv_sigma_right (λx, sigma_equiv_sigma_right (λa, !trunc_equiv⁻¹ᵉ))
definition pfiber_pequiv_component_of_is_contr [constructor] {A B : Type*} (f : A →* B) [is_contr B]
/- extra condition, something like trunc_functor 0 f is an embedding -/ : pfiber f ≃* component A :=
sorry
end misc
namespace category
definition precategory_Group.{u} [instance] [constructor] : precategory.{u+1 u} Group :=
begin
fapply precategory.mk,
{ exact λG H, G →g H },
{ exact _ },
{ exact λG H K ψ φ, ψ ∘g φ },
{ exact λG, gid G },
{ intros, apply homomorphism_eq, esimp },
{ intros, apply homomorphism_eq, esimp },
{ intros, apply homomorphism_eq, esimp }
end
definition precategory_AbGroup.{u} [instance] [constructor] : precategory.{u+1 u} AbGroup :=
begin
fapply precategory.mk,
{ exact λG H, G →g H },
{ exact _ },
{ exact λG H K ψ φ, ψ ∘g φ },
{ exact λG, gid G },
{ intros, apply homomorphism_eq, esimp },
{ intros, apply homomorphism_eq, esimp },
{ intros, apply homomorphism_eq, esimp }
end
open iso
definition Group_is_iso_of_is_equiv {G H : Group} (φ : G →g H) (H : is_equiv (group_fun φ)) :
is_iso φ :=
begin
fconstructor,
{ exact (isomorphism.mk φ H)⁻¹ᵍ },
{ apply homomorphism_eq, rexact left_inv φ },
{ apply homomorphism_eq, rexact right_inv φ }
end
definition Group_is_equiv_of_is_iso {G H : Group} (φ : G ⟶ H) (Hφ : is_iso φ) :
is_equiv (group_fun φ) :=
begin
fapply adjointify,
{ exact group_fun φ⁻¹ʰ },
{ note p := right_inverse φ, exact ap010 group_fun p },
{ note p := left_inverse φ, exact ap010 group_fun p }
end
definition Group_iso_equiv (G H : Group) : (G ≅ H) ≃ (G ≃g H) :=
begin
fapply equiv.MK,
{ intro φ, induction φ with φ φi, constructor, exact Group_is_equiv_of_is_iso φ _ },
{ intro v, induction v with φ φe, constructor, exact Group_is_iso_of_is_equiv φ _ },
{ intro v, induction v with φ φe, apply isomorphism_eq, reflexivity },
{ intro φ, induction φ with φ φi, apply iso_eq, reflexivity }
end
definition Group_props.{u} {A : Type.{u}} (v : (A → A → A) × (A → A) × A) : Prop.{u} :=
begin
induction v with m v, induction v with i o,
fapply trunctype.mk,
{ exact is_set A × (Πa, m a o = a) × (Πa, m o a = a) × (Πa b c, m (m a b) c = m a (m b c)) ×
(Πa, m (i a) a = o) },
{ apply is_trunc_of_imp_is_trunc, intro v, induction v with H v,
have is_prop (Πa, m a o = a), from _,
have is_prop (Πa, m o a = a), from _,
have is_prop (Πa b c, m (m a b) c = m a (m b c)), from _,
have is_prop (Πa, m (i a) a = o), from _,
apply is_trunc_prod }
end
definition Group.sigma_char2.{u} : Group.{u} ≃
Σ(A : Type.{u}) (v : (A → A → A) × (A → A) × A), Group_props v :=
begin
fapply equiv.MK,
{ intro G, refine ⟨G, _⟩, induction G with G g, induction g with m s ma o om mo i mi,
repeat (fconstructor; do 2 try assumption), },
{ intro v, induction v with x v, induction v with y v, repeat induction y with x y,
repeat induction v with x v, constructor, fconstructor, repeat assumption },
{ intro v, induction v with x v, induction v with y v, repeat induction y with x y,
repeat induction v with x v, reflexivity },
{ intro v, repeat induction v with x v, reflexivity },
end
open is_trunc
section
local attribute group.to_has_mul group.to_has_inv [coercion]
theorem inv_eq_of_mul_eq {A : Type} (G H : group A) (p : @mul A G ~2 @mul A H) :
@inv A G ~ @inv A H :=
begin
have foo : Π(g : A), @inv A G g = (@inv A G g * g) * @inv A H g,
from λg, !mul_inv_cancel_right⁻¹,
cases G with Gs Gm Gh1 G1 Gh2 Gh3 Gi Gh4,
cases H with Hs Hm Hh1 H1 Hh2 Hh3 Hi Hh4,
change Gi ~ Hi, intro g, have p' : Gm ~2 Hm, from p,
calc
Gi g = Hm (Hm (Gi g) g) (Hi g) : foo
... = Hm (Gm (Gi g) g) (Hi g) : by rewrite p'
... = Hm G1 (Hi g) : by rewrite Gh4
... = Gm G1 (Hi g) : by rewrite p'
... = Hi g : Gh2
end
theorem one_eq_of_mul_eq {A : Type} (G H : group A)
(p : @mul A (group.to_has_mul G) ~2 @mul A (group.to_has_mul H)) :
@one A (group.to_has_one G) = @one A (group.to_has_one H) :=
begin
cases G with Gm Gs Gh1 G1 Gh2 Gh3 Gi Gh4,
cases H with Hm Hs Hh1 H1 Hh2 Hh3 Hi Hh4,
exact (Hh2 G1)⁻¹ ⬝ (p H1 G1)⁻¹ ⬝ Gh3 H1,
end
end
open prod.ops
definition group_of_Group_props.{u} {A : Type.{u}} {m : A → A → A} {i : A → A} {o : A}
(H : Group_props (m, (i, o))) : group A :=
⦃group, mul := m, inv := i, one := o, is_set_carrier := H.1,
mul_one := H.2.1, one_mul := H.2.2.1, mul_assoc := H.2.2.2.1, mul_left_inv := H.2.2.2.2⦄
theorem Group_eq_equiv_lemma2 {A : Type} {m m' : A → A → A} {i i' : A → A} {o o' : A}
(H : Group_props (m, (i, o))) (H' : Group_props (m', (i', o'))) :
(m, (i, o)) = (m', (i', o')) ≃ (m ~2 m') :=
begin
have is_set A, from pr1 H,
apply equiv_of_is_prop,
{ intro p, exact apd100 (eq_pr1 p)},
{ intro p, apply prod_eq (eq_of_homotopy2 p),
apply prod_eq: esimp [Group_props] at *; esimp,
{ apply eq_of_homotopy,
exact inv_eq_of_mul_eq (group_of_Group_props H) (group_of_Group_props H') p },
{ exact one_eq_of_mul_eq (group_of_Group_props H) (group_of_Group_props H') p }}
end
open sigma.ops
theorem Group_eq_equiv_lemma {G H : Group}
(p : (Group.sigma_char2 G).1 = (Group.sigma_char2 H).1) :
((Group.sigma_char2 G).2 =[p] (Group.sigma_char2 H).2) ≃
(is_mul_hom (equiv_of_eq (proof p qed : Group.carrier G = Group.carrier H))) :=
begin
refine !sigma_pathover_equiv_of_is_prop ⬝e _,
induction G with G g, induction H with H h,
esimp [Group.sigma_char2] at p, induction p,
refine !pathover_idp ⬝e _,
induction g with s m ma o om mo i mi, induction h with σ μ μa ε εμ με ι μι,
exact Group_eq_equiv_lemma2 (Group.sigma_char2 (Group.mk G (group.mk s m ma o om mo i mi))).2.2
(Group.sigma_char2 (Group.mk G (group.mk σ μ μa ε εμ με ι μι))).2.2
end
definition isomorphism.sigma_char (G H : Group) : (G ≃g H) ≃ Σ(e : G ≃ H), is_mul_hom e :=
begin
fapply equiv.MK,
{ intro φ, exact ⟨equiv_of_isomorphism φ, to_respect_mul φ⟩ },
{ intro v, induction v with e p, exact isomorphism_of_equiv e p },
{ intro v, induction v with e p, induction e, reflexivity },
{ intro φ, induction φ with φ H, induction φ, reflexivity },
end
definition Group_eq_equiv (G H : Group) : G = H ≃ (G ≃g H) :=
begin
refine (eq_equiv_fn_eq_of_equiv Group.sigma_char2 G H) ⬝e _,
refine !sigma_eq_equiv ⬝e _,
refine sigma_equiv_sigma_right Group_eq_equiv_lemma ⬝e _,
transitivity (Σ(e : (Group.sigma_char2 G).1 ≃ (Group.sigma_char2 H).1),
@is_mul_hom _ _ _ _ (to_fun e)), apply sigma_ua,
exact !isomorphism.sigma_char⁻¹ᵉ
end
definition to_fun_Group_eq_equiv {G H : Group} (p : G = H)
: Group_eq_equiv G H p ~ isomorphism_of_eq p :=
begin
induction p, reflexivity
end
definition Group_eq2 {G H : Group} {p q : G = H}
(r : isomorphism_of_eq p ~ isomorphism_of_eq q) : p = q :=
begin
apply eq_of_fn_eq_fn (Group_eq_equiv G H),
apply isomorphism_eq,
intro g, refine to_fun_Group_eq_equiv p g ⬝ r g ⬝ (to_fun_Group_eq_equiv q g)⁻¹,
end
definition Group_eq_equiv_Group_iso (G₁ G₂ : Group) : G₁ = G₂ ≃ G₁ ≅ G₂ :=
Group_eq_equiv G₁ G₂ ⬝e (Group_iso_equiv G₁ G₂)⁻¹ᵉ
definition category_Group.{u} : category Group.{u} :=
category.mk precategory_Group
begin
intro G H,
apply is_equiv_of_equiv_of_homotopy (Group_eq_equiv_Group_iso G H),
intro p, induction p, fapply iso_eq, apply homomorphism_eq, reflexivity
end
definition category_AbGroup : category AbGroup :=
category.mk precategory_AbGroup sorry
definition Grp.{u} [constructor] : Category := category.Mk Group.{u} category_Group
definition AbGrp [constructor] : Category := category.Mk AbGroup category_AbGroup
end category
namespace sphere
-- definition constant_sphere_map_sphere {n m : ℕ} (H : n < m) (f : S n →* S m) :
-- f ~* pconst (S n) (S m) :=
-- begin
-- assert H : is_contr (Ω[n] (S m)),
-- { apply homotopy_group_sphere_le, },
-- apply phomotopy_of_eq,
-- apply eq_of_fn_eq_fn !sphere_pmap_pequiv,
-- apply @is_prop.elim
-- end
end sphere
section injective_surjective
open trunc fiber image
/- do we want to prove this without funext before we move it? -/
variables {A B C : Type} (f : A → B)
definition is_embedding_factor [is_set A] [is_set B] (g : B → C) (h : A → C) (H : g ∘ f ~ h) :
is_embedding h → is_embedding f :=
begin
induction H using homotopy.rec_on_idp,
intro E,
fapply is_embedding_of_is_injective,
intro x y p,
fapply @is_injective_of_is_embedding _ _ _ E _ _ (ap g p)
end
definition is_surjective_factor (g : B → C) (h : A → C) (H : g ∘ f ~ h) :
is_surjective h → is_surjective g :=
begin
induction H using homotopy.rec_on_idp,
intro S,
intro c,
note p := S c,
induction p,
apply tr,
fapply fiber.mk,
exact f a,
exact p
end
end injective_surjective
-- Yuri Sulyma's code from HoTT MRC
notation `⅀→`:(max+5) := susp_functor
notation `⅀⇒`:(max+5) := susp_functor_phomotopy
notation `Ω⇒`:(max+5) := ap1_phomotopy
definition ap1_phomotopy_symm {A B : Type*} {f g : A →* B} (p : f ~* g) : (Ω⇒ p)⁻¹* = Ω⇒ (p⁻¹*) :=
begin
induction p using phomotopy_rec_idp,
rewrite ap1_phomotopy_refl,
xrewrite [+refl_symm],
rewrite ap1_phomotopy_refl
end
definition ap1_phomotopy_trans {A B : Type*} {f g h : A →* B} (q : g ~* h) (p : f ~* g) : Ω⇒ (p ⬝* q) = Ω⇒ p ⬝* Ω⇒ q :=
begin
induction p using phomotopy_rec_idp,
induction q using phomotopy_rec_idp,
rewrite trans_refl,
rewrite [+ap1_phomotopy_refl],
rewrite trans_refl
end
namespace pointed
definition to_homotopy_pt_mk {A B : Type*} {f g : A →* B} (h : f ~ g)
(p : h pt ⬝ respect_pt g = respect_pt f) : to_homotopy_pt (phomotopy.mk h p) = p :=
to_right_inv !eq_con_inv_equiv_con_eq p
variables {A₀₀ A₂₀ A₀₂ A₂₂ : Type*}
{f₁₀ : A₀₀ →* A₂₀} {f₁₂ : A₀₂ →* A₂₂}
{f₀₁ : A₀₀ →* A₀₂} {f₂₁ : A₂₀ →* A₂₂}
definition psquare_transpose (p : psquare f₁₀ f₁₂ f₀₁ f₂₁) : psquare f₀₁ f₂₁ f₁₀ f₁₂ := p⁻¹*
end pointed
namespace pi
definition pi_bool_left_nat {A B : bool → Type} (g : Πx, A x -> B x) :
hsquare (pi_bool_left A) (pi_bool_left B) (pi_functor_right g) (prod_functor (g ff) (g tt)) :=
begin intro h, esimp end
definition pi_bool_left_inv_nat {A B : bool → Type} (g : Πx, A x -> B x) :
hsquare (pi_bool_left A)⁻¹ᵉ (pi_bool_left B)⁻¹ᵉ (prod_functor (g ff) (g tt)) (pi_functor_right g) := hhinverse (pi_bool_left_nat g)
end pi
namespace sum
infix ` +→ `:62 := sum_functor
variables {A₀₀ A₂₀ A₀₂ A₂₂ B₀₀ B₂₀ B₀₂ B₂₂ A A' B B' C C' : Type}
{f₁₀ : A₀₀ → A₂₀} {f₁₂ : A₀₂ → A₂₂} {f₀₁ : A₀₀ → A₀₂} {f₂₁ : A₂₀ → A₂₂}
{g₁₀ : B₀₀ → B₂₀} {g₁₂ : B₀₂ → B₂₂} {g₀₁ : B₀₀ → B₀₂} {g₂₁ : B₂₀ → B₂₂}
{h₀₁ : B₀₀ → A₀₂} {h₂₁ : B₂₀ → A₂₂}
definition sum_rec_hsquare [unfold 16] (h : hsquare f₁₀ f₁₂ f₀₁ f₂₁)
(k : hsquare g₁₀ f₁₂ h₀₁ h₂₁) : hsquare (f₁₀ +→ g₁₀) f₁₂ (sum.rec f₀₁ h₀₁) (sum.rec f₂₁ h₂₁) :=
begin intro x, induction x with a b, exact h a, exact k b end
definition sum_functor_hsquare [unfold 19] (h : hsquare f₁₀ f₁₂ f₀₁ f₂₁)
(k : hsquare g₁₀ g₁₂ g₀₁ g₂₁) : hsquare (f₁₀ +→ g₁₀) (f₁₂ +→ g₁₂) (f₀₁ +→ g₀₁) (f₂₁ +→ g₂₁) :=
sum_rec_hsquare (λa, ap inl (h a)) (λb, ap inr (k b))
definition sum_functor_compose (g : B → C) (f : A → B) (g' : B' → C') (f' : A' → B') :
(g ∘ f) +→ (g' ∘ f') ~ g +→ g' ∘ f +→ f' :=
begin intro x, induction x with a a': reflexivity end
definition sum_rec_sum_functor (g : B → C) (g' : B' → C) (f : A → B) (f' : A' → B') :
sum.rec g g' ∘ sum_functor f f' ~ sum.rec (g ∘ f) (g' ∘ f') :=
begin intro x, induction x with a a': reflexivity end
definition sum_rec_same_compose (g : B → C) (f : A → B) :
sum.rec (g ∘ f) (g ∘ f) ~ g ∘ sum.rec f f :=
begin intro x, induction x with a a': reflexivity end
definition sum_rec_same (f : A → B) :
sum.rec f f ~ f ∘ sum.rec id id :=
sum_rec_same_compose f id
end sum
namespace prod
infix ` ×→ `:63 := prod_functor
end prod
namespace equiv
definition rec_eq_of_equiv {A : Type} {P : A → A → Type} (e : Πa a', a = a' ≃ P a a')
{a a' : A} (Q : P a a' → Type) (H : Π(q : a = a'), Q (e a a' q)) :
Π(p : P a a'), Q p :=
equiv_rect (e a a') Q H
definition rec_idp_of_equiv {A : Type} {P : A → A → Type} (e : Πa a', a = a' ≃ P a a') {a : A}
(r : P a a) (s : e a a idp = r) (Q : Πa', P a a' → Type) (H : Q a r) ⦃a' : A⦄ (p : P a a') :
Q a' p :=
rec_eq_of_equiv e _ begin intro q, induction q, induction s, exact H end p
definition rec_idp_of_equiv_idp {A : Type} {P : A → A → Type} (e : Πa a', a = a' ≃ P a a') {a : A}
(r : P a a) (s : e a a idp = r) (Q : Πa', P a a' → Type) (H : Q a r) :
rec_idp_of_equiv e r s Q H r = H :=
begin
induction s, refine !is_equiv_rect_comp ⬝ _, reflexivity
end
end equiv
|
aa64a0dcf5e009a2744aa31aba4e84ef62828304 | c777c32c8e484e195053731103c5e52af26a25d1 | /src/analysis/normed_space/pi_Lp.lean | da14f060696deae741cb2ab2f08c7e154e3ed404 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kbuzzard/mathlib | 2ff9e85dfe2a46f4b291927f983afec17e946eb8 | 58537299e922f9c77df76cb613910914a479c1f7 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,313,702,744 | 1,683,974,212,000 | 1,683,974,212,000 | 128,185,277 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,522,920,600,000 | 1,522,920,600,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 35,904 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Jireh Loreaux
-/
import analysis.mean_inequalities
import data.fintype.order
/-!
# `L^p` distance on finite products of metric spaces
Given finitely many metric spaces, one can put the max distance on their product, but there is also
a whole family of natural distances, indexed by a parameter `p : ℝ≥0∞`, that also induce
the product topology. We define them in this file. For `0 < p < ∞`, the distance on `Π i, α i`
is given by
$$
d(x, y) = \left(\sum d(x_i, y_i)^p\right)^{1/p}.
$$,
whereas for `p = 0` it is the cardinality of the set ${ i | x_i ≠ y_i}$. For `p = ∞` the distance
is the supremum of the distances.
We give instances of this construction for emetric spaces, metric spaces, normed groups and normed
spaces.
To avoid conflicting instances, all these are defined on a copy of the original Π-type, named
`pi_Lp p α`. The assumpion `[fact (1 ≤ p)]` is required for the metric and normed space instances.
We ensure that the topology, bornology and uniform structure on `pi_Lp p α` are (defeq to) the
product topology, product bornology and product uniformity, to be able to use freely continuity
statements for the coordinate functions, for instance.
## Implementation notes
We only deal with the `L^p` distance on a product of finitely many metric spaces, which may be
distinct. A closely related construction is `lp`, the `L^p` norm on a product of (possibly
infinitely many) normed spaces, where the norm is
$$
\left(\sum ‖f (x)‖^p \right)^{1/p}.
$$
However, the topology induced by this construction is not the product topology, and some functions
have infinite `L^p` norm. These subtleties are not present in the case of finitely many metric
spaces, hence it is worth devoting a file to this specific case which is particularly well behaved.
Another related construction is `measure_theory.Lp`, the `L^p` norm on the space of functions from
a measure space to a normed space, where the norm is
$$
\left(\int ‖f (x)‖^p dμ\right)^{1/p}.
$$
This has all the same subtleties as `lp`, and the further subtlety that this only
defines a seminorm (as almost everywhere zero functions have zero `L^p` norm).
The construction `pi_Lp` corresponds to the special case of `measure_theory.Lp` in which the basis
is a finite space equipped with the counting measure.
To prove that the topology (and the uniform structure) on a finite product with the `L^p` distance
are the same as those coming from the `L^∞` distance, we could argue that the `L^p` and `L^∞` norms
are equivalent on `ℝ^n` for abstract (norm equivalence) reasons. Instead, we give a more explicit
(easy) proof which provides a comparison between these two norms with explicit constants.
We also set up the theory for `pseudo_emetric_space` and `pseudo_metric_space`.
-/
open real set filter is_R_or_C bornology
open_locale big_operators uniformity topology nnreal ennreal
noncomputable theory
/-- A copy of a Pi type, on which we will put the `L^p` distance. Since the Pi type itself is
already endowed with the `L^∞` distance, we need the type synonym to avoid confusing typeclass
resolution. Also, we let it depend on `p`, to get a whole family of type on which we can put
different distances. -/
@[nolint unused_arguments]
def pi_Lp (p : ℝ≥0∞) {ι : Type*} (α : ι → Type*) : Type* := Π (i : ι), α i
instance (p : ℝ≥0∞) {ι : Type*} (α : ι → Type*) [Π i, inhabited (α i)] : inhabited (pi_Lp p α) :=
⟨λ i, default⟩
namespace pi_Lp
variables (p : ℝ≥0∞) (𝕜 𝕜' : Type*) {ι : Type*} (α : ι → Type*) (β : ι → Type*)
/-- Canonical bijection between `pi_Lp p α` and the original Pi type. We introduce it to be able
to compare the `L^p` and `L^∞` distances through it. -/
protected def equiv : pi_Lp p α ≃ Π (i : ι), α i :=
equiv.refl _
/-! Note that the unapplied versions of these lemmas are deliberately omitted, as they break
the use of the type synonym. -/
@[simp] lemma equiv_apply (x : pi_Lp p α) (i : ι) : pi_Lp.equiv p α x i = x i := rfl
@[simp] lemma equiv_symm_apply (x : Π i, α i) (i : ι) : (pi_Lp.equiv p α).symm x i = x i := rfl
section dist_norm
variables [fintype ι]
/-!
### Definition of `edist`, `dist` and `norm` on `pi_Lp`
In this section we define the `edist`, `dist` and `norm` functions on `pi_Lp p α` without assuming
`[fact (1 ≤ p)]` or metric properties of the spaces `α i`. This allows us to provide the rewrite
lemmas for each of three cases `p = 0`, `p = ∞` and `0 < p.to_real`.
-/
section edist
variables [Π i, has_edist (β i)]
/-- Endowing the space `pi_Lp p β` with the `L^p` edistance. We register this instance
separate from `pi_Lp.pseudo_emetric` since the latter requires the type class hypothesis
`[fact (1 ≤ p)]` in order to prove the triangle inequality.
Registering this separately allows for a future emetric-like structure on `pi_Lp p β` for `p < 1`
satisfying a relaxed triangle inequality. The terminology for this varies throughout the
literature, but it is sometimes called a *quasi-metric* or *semi-metric*. -/
instance : has_edist (pi_Lp p β) :=
{ edist := λ f g, if hp : p = 0 then {i | f i ≠ g i}.to_finite.to_finset.card
else (if p = ∞ then ⨆ i, edist (f i) (g i)
else (∑ i, (edist (f i) (g i) ^ p.to_real)) ^ (1/p.to_real)) }
variable {β}
lemma edist_eq_card (f g : pi_Lp 0 β) : edist f g = {i | f i ≠ g i}.to_finite.to_finset.card :=
if_pos rfl
lemma edist_eq_sum {p : ℝ≥0∞} (hp : 0 < p.to_real) (f g : pi_Lp p β) :
edist f g = (∑ i, edist (f i) (g i) ^ p.to_real) ^ (1/p.to_real) :=
let hp' := ennreal.to_real_pos_iff.mp hp in (if_neg hp'.1.ne').trans (if_neg hp'.2.ne)
lemma edist_eq_supr (f g : pi_Lp ∞ β) : edist f g = ⨆ i, edist (f i) (g i) :=
by { dsimp [edist], exact if_neg ennreal.top_ne_zero }
end edist
section edist_prop
variables {β} [Π i, pseudo_emetric_space (β i)]
/-- This holds independent of `p` and does not require `[fact (1 ≤ p)]`. We keep it separate
from `pi_Lp.pseudo_emetric_space` so it can be used also for `p < 1`. -/
protected lemma edist_self (f : pi_Lp p β) : edist f f = 0 :=
begin
rcases p.trichotomy with (rfl | rfl | h),
{ simp [edist_eq_card], },
{ simp [edist_eq_supr], },
{ simp [edist_eq_sum h, ennreal.zero_rpow_of_pos h, ennreal.zero_rpow_of_pos (inv_pos.2 $ h)]}
end
/-- This holds independent of `p` and does not require `[fact (1 ≤ p)]`. We keep it separate
from `pi_Lp.pseudo_emetric_space` so it can be used also for `p < 1`. -/
protected lemma edist_comm (f g : pi_Lp p β) : edist f g = edist g f :=
begin
rcases p.trichotomy with (rfl | rfl | h),
{ simp only [edist_eq_card, eq_comm, ne.def] },
{ simp only [edist_eq_supr, edist_comm] },
{ simp only [edist_eq_sum h, edist_comm] }
end
end edist_prop
section dist
variables [Π i, has_dist (α i)]
/-- Endowing the space `pi_Lp p β` with the `L^p` distance. We register this instance
separate from `pi_Lp.pseudo_metric` since the latter requires the type class hypothesis
`[fact (1 ≤ p)]` in order to prove the triangle inequality.
Registering this separately allows for a future metric-like structure on `pi_Lp p β` for `p < 1`
satisfying a relaxed triangle inequality. The terminology for this varies throughout the
literature, but it is sometimes called a *quasi-metric* or *semi-metric*. -/
instance : has_dist (pi_Lp p α) :=
{ dist := λ f g, if hp : p = 0 then {i | f i ≠ g i}.to_finite.to_finset.card
else (if p = ∞ then ⨆ i, dist (f i) (g i)
else (∑ i, (dist (f i) (g i) ^ p.to_real)) ^ (1/p.to_real)) }
variable {α}
lemma dist_eq_card (f g : pi_Lp 0 α) : dist f g = {i | f i ≠ g i}.to_finite.to_finset.card :=
if_pos rfl
lemma dist_eq_sum {p : ℝ≥0∞} (hp : 0 < p.to_real) (f g : pi_Lp p α) :
dist f g = (∑ i, dist (f i) (g i) ^ p.to_real) ^ (1/p.to_real) :=
let hp' := ennreal.to_real_pos_iff.mp hp in (if_neg hp'.1.ne').trans (if_neg hp'.2.ne)
lemma dist_eq_csupr (f g : pi_Lp ∞ α) : dist f g = ⨆ i, dist (f i) (g i) :=
by { dsimp [dist], exact if_neg ennreal.top_ne_zero }
end dist
section norm
variables [Π i, has_norm (β i)] [Π i, has_zero (β i)]
/-- Endowing the space `pi_Lp p β` with the `L^p` norm. We register this instance
separate from `pi_Lp.seminormed_add_comm_group` since the latter requires the type class hypothesis
`[fact (1 ≤ p)]` in order to prove the triangle inequality.
Registering this separately allows for a future norm-like structure on `pi_Lp p β` for `p < 1`
satisfying a relaxed triangle inequality. These are called *quasi-norms*. -/
instance has_norm : has_norm (pi_Lp p β) :=
{ norm := λ f, if hp : p = 0 then {i | f i ≠ 0}.to_finite.to_finset.card
else (if p = ∞ then ⨆ i, ‖f i‖ else (∑ i, ‖f i‖ ^ p.to_real) ^ (1 / p.to_real)) }
variables {p β}
lemma norm_eq_card (f : pi_Lp 0 β) : ‖f‖ = {i | f i ≠ 0}.to_finite.to_finset.card :=
if_pos rfl
lemma norm_eq_csupr (f : pi_Lp ∞ β) : ‖f‖ = ⨆ i, ‖f i‖ :=
by { dsimp [norm], exact if_neg ennreal.top_ne_zero }
lemma norm_eq_sum (hp : 0 < p.to_real) (f : pi_Lp p β) :
‖f‖ = (∑ i, ‖f i‖ ^ p.to_real) ^ (1 / p.to_real) :=
let hp' := ennreal.to_real_pos_iff.mp hp in (if_neg hp'.1.ne').trans (if_neg hp'.2.ne)
end norm
end dist_norm
section aux
/-!
### The uniformity on finite `L^p` products is the product uniformity
In this section, we put the `L^p` edistance on `pi_Lp p α`, and we check that the uniformity
coming from this edistance coincides with the product uniformity, by showing that the canonical
map to the Pi type (with the `L^∞` distance) is a uniform embedding, as it is both Lipschitz and
antiLipschitz.
We only register this emetric space structure as a temporary instance, as the true instance (to be
registered later) will have as uniformity exactly the product uniformity, instead of the one coming
from the edistance (which is equal to it, but not defeq). See Note [forgetful inheritance]
explaining why having definitionally the right uniformity is often important.
-/
variables [fact (1 ≤ p)] [Π i, pseudo_metric_space (α i)] [Π i, pseudo_emetric_space (β i)]
variables [fintype ι]
/-- Endowing the space `pi_Lp p β` with the `L^p` pseudoemetric structure. This definition is not
satisfactory, as it does not register the fact that the topology and the uniform structure coincide
with the product one. Therefore, we do not register it as an instance. Using this as a temporary
pseudoemetric space instance, we will show that the uniform structure is equal (but not defeq) to
the product one, and then register an instance in which we replace the uniform structure by the
product one using this pseudoemetric space and `pseudo_emetric_space.replace_uniformity`. -/
def pseudo_emetric_aux : pseudo_emetric_space (pi_Lp p β) :=
{ edist_self := pi_Lp.edist_self p,
edist_comm := pi_Lp.edist_comm p,
edist_triangle := λ f g h,
begin
unfreezingI { rcases p.dichotomy with (rfl | hp) },
{ simp only [edist_eq_supr],
casesI is_empty_or_nonempty ι,
{ simp only [csupr_of_empty, ennreal.bot_eq_zero, add_zero, nonpos_iff_eq_zero] },
exact supr_le (λ i, (edist_triangle _ (g i) _).trans $
add_le_add (le_supr _ i) (le_supr _ i))},
{ simp only [edist_eq_sum (zero_lt_one.trans_le hp)],
calc (∑ i, edist (f i) (h i) ^ p.to_real) ^ (1 / p.to_real) ≤
(∑ i, (edist (f i) (g i) + edist (g i) (h i)) ^ p.to_real) ^ (1 / p.to_real) :
begin
apply ennreal.rpow_le_rpow _ (one_div_nonneg.2 $ zero_le_one.trans hp),
refine finset.sum_le_sum (λ i hi, _),
exact ennreal.rpow_le_rpow (edist_triangle _ _ _) (zero_le_one.trans hp),
end
... ≤ (∑ i, edist (f i) (g i) ^ p.to_real) ^ (1 / p.to_real)
+ (∑ i, edist (g i) (h i) ^ p.to_real) ^ (1 / p.to_real) : ennreal.Lp_add_le _ _ _ hp },
end }
local attribute [instance] pi_Lp.pseudo_emetric_aux
/-- An auxiliary lemma used twice in the proof of `pi_Lp.pseudo_metric_aux` below. Not intended for
use outside this file. -/
lemma supr_edist_ne_top_aux {ι : Type*} [finite ι] {α : ι → Type*} [Π i, pseudo_metric_space (α i)]
(f g : pi_Lp ∞ α) : (⨆ i, edist (f i) (g i)) ≠ ⊤ :=
begin
casesI nonempty_fintype ι,
obtain ⟨M, hM⟩ := fintype.exists_le (λ i, (⟨dist (f i) (g i), dist_nonneg⟩ : ℝ≥0)),
refine ne_of_lt ((supr_le $ λ i, _).trans_lt (@ennreal.coe_lt_top M)),
simp only [edist, pseudo_metric_space.edist_dist, ennreal.of_real_eq_coe_nnreal dist_nonneg],
exact_mod_cast hM i,
end
/-- Endowing the space `pi_Lp p α` with the `L^p` pseudometric structure. This definition is not
satisfactory, as it does not register the fact that the topology, the uniform structure, and the
bornology coincide with the product ones. Therefore, we do not register it as an instance. Using
this as a temporary pseudoemetric space instance, we will show that the uniform structure is equal
(but not defeq) to the product one, and then register an instance in which we replace the uniform
structure and the bornology by the product ones using this pseudometric space,
`pseudo_metric_space.replace_uniformity`, and `pseudo_metric_space.replace_bornology`.
See note [reducible non-instances] -/
@[reducible] def pseudo_metric_aux : pseudo_metric_space (pi_Lp p α) :=
pseudo_emetric_space.to_pseudo_metric_space_of_dist dist
(λ f g,
begin
unfreezingI { rcases p.dichotomy with (rfl | h) },
{ exact supr_edist_ne_top_aux f g },
{ rw edist_eq_sum (zero_lt_one.trans_le h),
exact ennreal.rpow_ne_top_of_nonneg (one_div_nonneg.2 (zero_le_one.trans h)) (ne_of_lt $
(ennreal.sum_lt_top $ λ i hi, ennreal.rpow_ne_top_of_nonneg (zero_le_one.trans h)
(edist_ne_top _ _)))}
end)
(λ f g,
begin
unfreezingI { rcases p.dichotomy with (rfl | h) },
{ rw [edist_eq_supr, dist_eq_csupr],
{ casesI is_empty_or_nonempty ι,
{ simp only [real.csupr_empty, csupr_of_empty, ennreal.bot_eq_zero, ennreal.zero_to_real] },
{ refine le_antisymm (csupr_le $ λ i, _) _,
{ rw [←ennreal.of_real_le_iff_le_to_real (supr_edist_ne_top_aux f g),
←pseudo_metric_space.edist_dist],
exact le_supr _ i, },
{ refine ennreal.to_real_le_of_le_of_real (real.Sup_nonneg _ _) (supr_le $ λ i, _),
{ rintro - ⟨i, rfl⟩,
exact dist_nonneg, },
{ unfold edist, rw pseudo_metric_space.edist_dist,
exact ennreal.of_real_le_of_real (le_csupr (fintype.bdd_above_range _) i), } } } } },
{ have A : ∀ i, edist (f i) (g i) ^ p.to_real ≠ ⊤,
from λ i, ennreal.rpow_ne_top_of_nonneg (zero_le_one.trans h) (edist_ne_top _ _),
simp only [edist_eq_sum (zero_lt_one.trans_le h), dist_edist, ennreal.to_real_rpow,
dist_eq_sum (zero_lt_one.trans_le h), ← ennreal.to_real_sum (λ i _, A i)] }
end)
local attribute [instance] pi_Lp.pseudo_metric_aux
lemma lipschitz_with_equiv_aux : lipschitz_with 1 (pi_Lp.equiv p β) :=
begin
intros x y,
unfreezingI { rcases p.dichotomy with (rfl | h) },
{ simpa only [ennreal.coe_one, one_mul, edist_eq_supr, edist, finset.sup_le_iff,
finset.mem_univ, forall_true_left] using le_supr (λ i, edist (x i) (y i)), },
{ have cancel : p.to_real * (1/p.to_real) = 1 := mul_div_cancel' 1 (zero_lt_one.trans_le h).ne',
rw edist_eq_sum (zero_lt_one.trans_le h),
simp only [edist, forall_prop_of_true, one_mul, finset.mem_univ, finset.sup_le_iff,
ennreal.coe_one],
assume i,
calc
edist (x i) (y i) = (edist (x i) (y i) ^ p.to_real) ^ (1/p.to_real) :
by simp [← ennreal.rpow_mul, cancel, -one_div]
... ≤ (∑ i, edist (x i) (y i) ^ p.to_real) ^ (1 / p.to_real) :
begin
apply ennreal.rpow_le_rpow _ (one_div_nonneg.2 $ (zero_le_one.trans h)),
exact finset.single_le_sum (λ i hi, (bot_le : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ _)) (finset.mem_univ i)
end }
end
lemma antilipschitz_with_equiv_aux :
antilipschitz_with ((fintype.card ι : ℝ≥0) ^ (1 / p).to_real) (pi_Lp.equiv p β) :=
begin
intros x y,
unfreezingI { rcases p.dichotomy with (rfl | h) },
{ simp only [edist_eq_supr, ennreal.div_top, ennreal.zero_to_real, nnreal.rpow_zero,
ennreal.coe_one, one_mul, supr_le_iff],
exact λ i, finset.le_sup (finset.mem_univ i), },
{ have pos : 0 < p.to_real := zero_lt_one.trans_le h,
have nonneg : 0 ≤ 1 / p.to_real := one_div_nonneg.2 (le_of_lt pos),
have cancel : p.to_real * (1/p.to_real) = 1 := mul_div_cancel' 1 (ne_of_gt pos),
rw [edist_eq_sum pos, ennreal.to_real_div 1 p],
simp only [edist, ←one_div, ennreal.one_to_real],
calc (∑ i, edist (x i) (y i) ^ p.to_real) ^ (1 / p.to_real) ≤
(∑ i, edist (pi_Lp.equiv p β x) (pi_Lp.equiv p β y) ^ p.to_real) ^ (1 / p.to_real) :
begin
apply ennreal.rpow_le_rpow _ nonneg,
apply finset.sum_le_sum (λ i hi, _),
apply ennreal.rpow_le_rpow _ (le_of_lt pos),
exact finset.le_sup (finset.mem_univ i)
end
... = (((fintype.card ι : ℝ≥0)) ^ (1 / p.to_real) : ℝ≥0) *
edist (pi_Lp.equiv p β x) (pi_Lp.equiv p β y) :
begin
simp only [nsmul_eq_mul, finset.card_univ, ennreal.rpow_one, finset.sum_const,
ennreal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ nonneg, ←ennreal.rpow_mul, cancel],
have : (fintype.card ι : ℝ≥0∞) = (fintype.card ι : ℝ≥0) :=
(ennreal.coe_nat (fintype.card ι)).symm,
rw [this, ennreal.coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ nonneg]
end }
end
lemma aux_uniformity_eq :
𝓤 (pi_Lp p β) = 𝓤[Pi.uniform_space _] :=
begin
have A : uniform_inducing (pi_Lp.equiv p β) :=
(antilipschitz_with_equiv_aux p β).uniform_inducing
(lipschitz_with_equiv_aux p β).uniform_continuous,
have : (λ (x : pi_Lp p β × pi_Lp p β),
((pi_Lp.equiv p β) x.fst, (pi_Lp.equiv p β) x.snd)) = id,
by ext i; refl,
rw [← A.comap_uniformity, this, comap_id]
end
lemma aux_cobounded_eq :
cobounded (pi_Lp p α) = @cobounded _ pi.bornology :=
calc cobounded (pi_Lp p α) = comap (pi_Lp.equiv p α) (cobounded _) :
le_antisymm (antilipschitz_with_equiv_aux p α).tendsto_cobounded.le_comap
(lipschitz_with_equiv_aux p α).comap_cobounded_le
... = _ : comap_id
end aux
/-! ### Instances on finite `L^p` products -/
instance uniform_space [Π i, uniform_space (β i)] : uniform_space (pi_Lp p β) :=
Pi.uniform_space _
lemma uniform_continuous_equiv [Π i, uniform_space (β i)] :
uniform_continuous (pi_Lp.equiv p β) :=
uniform_continuous_id
lemma uniform_continuous_equiv_symm [Π i, uniform_space (β i)] :
uniform_continuous (pi_Lp.equiv p β).symm :=
uniform_continuous_id
@[continuity]
lemma continuous_equiv [Π i, uniform_space (β i)] : continuous (pi_Lp.equiv p β) :=
continuous_id
@[continuity]
lemma continuous_equiv_symm [Π i, uniform_space (β i)] : continuous (pi_Lp.equiv p β).symm :=
continuous_id
variable [fintype ι]
instance bornology [Π i, bornology (β i)] : bornology (pi_Lp p β) := pi.bornology
-- throughout the rest of the file, we assume `1 ≤ p`
variables [fact (1 ≤ p)]
/-- pseudoemetric space instance on the product of finitely many pseudoemetric spaces, using the
`L^p` pseudoedistance, and having as uniformity the product uniformity. -/
instance [Π i, pseudo_emetric_space (β i)] : pseudo_emetric_space (pi_Lp p β) :=
(pseudo_emetric_aux p β).replace_uniformity (aux_uniformity_eq p β).symm
/-- emetric space instance on the product of finitely many emetric spaces, using the `L^p`
edistance, and having as uniformity the product uniformity. -/
instance [Π i, emetric_space (α i)] : emetric_space (pi_Lp p α) :=
@emetric_space.of_t0_pseudo_emetric_space (pi_Lp p α) _ pi.t0_space
/-- pseudometric space instance on the product of finitely many psuedometric spaces, using the
`L^p` distance, and having as uniformity the product uniformity. -/
instance [Π i, pseudo_metric_space (β i)] : pseudo_metric_space (pi_Lp p β) :=
((pseudo_metric_aux p β).replace_uniformity (aux_uniformity_eq p β).symm).replace_bornology $
λ s, filter.ext_iff.1 (aux_cobounded_eq p β).symm sᶜ
/-- metric space instance on the product of finitely many metric spaces, using the `L^p` distance,
and having as uniformity the product uniformity. -/
instance [Π i, metric_space (α i)] : metric_space (pi_Lp p α) :=
metric_space.of_t0_pseudo_metric_space _
lemma nndist_eq_sum {p : ℝ≥0∞} [fact (1 ≤ p)] {β : ι → Type*}
[Π i, pseudo_metric_space (β i)] (hp : p ≠ ∞) (x y : pi_Lp p β) :
nndist x y = (∑ i : ι, nndist (x i) (y i) ^ p.to_real) ^ (1 / p.to_real) :=
subtype.ext $ by { push_cast, exact dist_eq_sum (p.to_real_pos_iff_ne_top.mpr hp) _ _ }
lemma nndist_eq_supr {β : ι → Type*} [Π i, pseudo_metric_space (β i)] (x y : pi_Lp ∞ β) :
nndist x y = ⨆ i, nndist (x i) (y i) :=
subtype.ext $ by { push_cast, exact dist_eq_csupr _ _ }
lemma lipschitz_with_equiv [Π i, pseudo_emetric_space (β i)] :
lipschitz_with 1 (pi_Lp.equiv p β) :=
lipschitz_with_equiv_aux p β
lemma antilipschitz_with_equiv [Π i, pseudo_emetric_space (β i)] :
antilipschitz_with ((fintype.card ι : ℝ≥0) ^ (1 / p).to_real) (pi_Lp.equiv p β) :=
antilipschitz_with_equiv_aux p β
lemma infty_equiv_isometry [Π i, pseudo_emetric_space (β i)] :
isometry (pi_Lp.equiv ∞ β) :=
λ x y, le_antisymm (by simpa only [ennreal.coe_one, one_mul] using lipschitz_with_equiv ∞ β x y)
(by simpa only [ennreal.div_top, ennreal.zero_to_real, nnreal.rpow_zero, ennreal.coe_one, one_mul]
using antilipschitz_with_equiv ∞ β x y)
variables (p β)
/-- seminormed group instance on the product of finitely many normed groups, using the `L^p`
norm. -/
instance seminormed_add_comm_group [Π i, seminormed_add_comm_group (β i)] :
seminormed_add_comm_group (pi_Lp p β) :=
{ dist_eq := λ x y,
begin
unfreezingI { rcases p.dichotomy with (rfl | h) },
{ simpa only [dist_eq_csupr, norm_eq_csupr, dist_eq_norm] },
{ have : p ≠ ∞, { intros hp, rw [hp, ennreal.top_to_real] at h, linarith,} ,
simpa only [dist_eq_sum (zero_lt_one.trans_le h), norm_eq_sum (zero_lt_one.trans_le h),
dist_eq_norm], }
end,
.. pi.add_comm_group, }
/-- normed group instance on the product of finitely many normed groups, using the `L^p` norm. -/
instance normed_add_comm_group [Π i, normed_add_comm_group (α i)] :
normed_add_comm_group (pi_Lp p α) :=
{ ..pi_Lp.seminormed_add_comm_group p α }
lemma nnnorm_eq_sum {p : ℝ≥0∞} [fact (1 ≤ p)] {β : ι → Type*} (hp : p ≠ ∞)
[Π i, seminormed_add_comm_group (β i)] (f : pi_Lp p β) :
‖f‖₊ = (∑ i, ‖f i‖₊ ^ p.to_real) ^ (1 / p.to_real) :=
by { ext, simp [nnreal.coe_sum, norm_eq_sum (p.to_real_pos_iff_ne_top.mpr hp)] }
lemma nnnorm_eq_csupr {β : ι → Type*} [Π i, seminormed_add_comm_group (β i)] (f : pi_Lp ∞ β) :
‖f‖₊ = ⨆ i, ‖f i‖₊ :=
by { ext, simp [nnreal.coe_supr, norm_eq_csupr] }
lemma norm_eq_of_nat {p : ℝ≥0∞} [fact (1 ≤ p)] {β : ι → Type*}
[Π i, seminormed_add_comm_group (β i)] (n : ℕ) (h : p = n) (f : pi_Lp p β) :
‖f‖ = (∑ i, ‖f i‖ ^ n) ^ (1/(n : ℝ)) :=
begin
have := p.to_real_pos_iff_ne_top.mpr (ne_of_eq_of_ne h $ ennreal.nat_ne_top n),
simp only [one_div, h, real.rpow_nat_cast, ennreal.to_real_nat, eq_self_iff_true,
finset.sum_congr, norm_eq_sum this],
end
lemma norm_eq_of_L2 {β : ι → Type*} [Π i, seminormed_add_comm_group (β i)] (x : pi_Lp 2 β) :
‖x‖ = sqrt (∑ (i : ι), ‖x i‖ ^ 2) :=
by { convert norm_eq_of_nat 2 (by norm_cast) _, rw sqrt_eq_rpow, norm_cast }
lemma nnnorm_eq_of_L2 {β : ι → Type*} [Π i, seminormed_add_comm_group (β i)] (x : pi_Lp 2 β) :
‖x‖₊ = nnreal.sqrt (∑ (i : ι), ‖x i‖₊ ^ 2) :=
subtype.ext $ by { push_cast, exact norm_eq_of_L2 x }
lemma norm_sq_eq_of_L2 (β : ι → Type*) [Π i, seminormed_add_comm_group (β i)] (x : pi_Lp 2 β) :
‖x‖ ^ 2 = ∑ (i : ι), ‖x i‖ ^ 2 :=
begin
suffices : ‖x‖₊ ^ 2 = ∑ (i : ι), ‖x i‖₊ ^ 2,
{ simpa only [nnreal.coe_sum] using congr_arg (coe : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) this },
rw [nnnorm_eq_of_L2, nnreal.sq_sqrt],
end
lemma dist_eq_of_L2 {β : ι → Type*} [Π i, seminormed_add_comm_group (β i)] (x y : pi_Lp 2 β) :
dist x y = (∑ i, dist (x i) (y i) ^ 2).sqrt :=
by simp_rw [dist_eq_norm, norm_eq_of_L2, pi.sub_apply]
lemma nndist_eq_of_L2 {β : ι → Type*} [Π i, seminormed_add_comm_group (β i)] (x y : pi_Lp 2 β) :
nndist x y = (∑ i, nndist (x i) (y i) ^ 2).sqrt :=
subtype.ext $ by { push_cast, exact dist_eq_of_L2 _ _ }
lemma edist_eq_of_L2 {β : ι → Type*} [Π i, seminormed_add_comm_group (β i)] (x y : pi_Lp 2 β) :
edist x y = (∑ i, edist (x i) (y i) ^ 2) ^ (1 / 2 : ℝ) :=
by simp [pi_Lp.edist_eq_sum]
variables [normed_field 𝕜] [normed_field 𝕜']
/-- The product of finitely many normed spaces is a normed space, with the `L^p` norm. -/
instance normed_space [Π i, seminormed_add_comm_group (β i)]
[Π i, normed_space 𝕜 (β i)] : normed_space 𝕜 (pi_Lp p β) :=
{ norm_smul_le := λ c f,
begin
unfreezingI { rcases p.dichotomy with (rfl | hp) },
{ letI : module 𝕜 (pi_Lp ∞ β) := pi.module ι β 𝕜,
suffices : ‖c • f‖₊ = ‖c‖₊ * ‖f‖₊, { exact_mod_cast nnreal.coe_mono this.le },
simpa only [nnnorm_eq_csupr, nnreal.mul_supr, ←nnnorm_smul] },
{ have : p.to_real * (1 / p.to_real) = 1 := mul_div_cancel' 1 (zero_lt_one.trans_le hp).ne',
simp only [norm_eq_sum (zero_lt_one.trans_le hp), norm_smul, mul_rpow, norm_nonneg,
←finset.mul_sum, pi.smul_apply],
rw [mul_rpow (rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) _), ← rpow_mul (norm_nonneg _),
this, rpow_one],
exact finset.sum_nonneg (λ i hi, rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) _) },
end,
.. (pi.module ι β 𝕜) }
instance is_scalar_tower [Π i, seminormed_add_comm_group (β i)]
[has_smul 𝕜 𝕜'] [Π i, normed_space 𝕜 (β i)] [Π i, normed_space 𝕜' (β i)]
[Π i, is_scalar_tower 𝕜 𝕜' (β i)] : is_scalar_tower 𝕜 𝕜' (pi_Lp p β) :=
pi.is_scalar_tower
instance smul_comm_class [Π i, seminormed_add_comm_group (β i)]
[Π i, normed_space 𝕜 (β i)] [Π i, normed_space 𝕜' (β i)]
[Π i, smul_comm_class 𝕜 𝕜' (β i)] : smul_comm_class 𝕜 𝕜' (pi_Lp p β) :=
pi.smul_comm_class
instance finite_dimensional [Π i, seminormed_add_comm_group (β i)]
[Π i, normed_space 𝕜 (β i)] [I : ∀ i, finite_dimensional 𝕜 (β i)] :
finite_dimensional 𝕜 (pi_Lp p β) :=
finite_dimensional.finite_dimensional_pi' _ _
/- Register simplification lemmas for the applications of `pi_Lp` elements, as the usual lemmas
for Pi types will not trigger. -/
variables {𝕜 𝕜' p α} [Π i, seminormed_add_comm_group (β i)] [Π i, normed_space 𝕜 (β i)] (c : 𝕜)
variables (x y : pi_Lp p β) (x' y' : Π i, β i) (i : ι)
@[simp] lemma zero_apply : (0 : pi_Lp p β) i = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma add_apply : (x + y) i = x i + y i := rfl
@[simp] lemma sub_apply : (x - y) i = x i - y i := rfl
@[simp] lemma smul_apply : (c • x) i = c • x i := rfl
@[simp] lemma neg_apply : (-x) i = - (x i) := rfl
/-- The canonical map `pi_Lp.equiv` between `pi_Lp ∞ β` and `Π i, β i` as a linear isometric
equivalence. -/
def equivₗᵢ : pi_Lp ∞ β ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] Π i, β i :=
{ map_add' := λ f g, rfl,
map_smul' := λ c f, rfl,
norm_map' := λ f,
begin
suffices : finset.univ.sup (λ i, ‖f i‖₊) = ⨆ i, ‖f i‖₊,
{ simpa only [nnreal.coe_supr] using congr_arg (coe : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) this },
refine antisymm (finset.sup_le (λ i _, le_csupr (fintype.bdd_above_range (λ i, ‖f i‖₊)) _)) _,
casesI is_empty_or_nonempty ι,
{ simp only [csupr_of_empty, finset.univ_eq_empty, finset.sup_empty], },
{ exact csupr_le (λ i, finset.le_sup (finset.mem_univ i)) },
end,
.. pi_Lp.equiv ∞ β }
variables {ι' : Type*}
variables [fintype ι']
variables (p 𝕜) (E : Type*) [normed_add_comm_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E]
/-- An equivalence of finite domains induces a linearly isometric equivalence of finitely supported
functions-/
def _root_.linear_isometry_equiv.pi_Lp_congr_left (e : ι ≃ ι') :
pi_Lp p (λ i : ι, E) ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] pi_Lp p (λ i : ι', E) :=
{ to_linear_equiv := linear_equiv.Pi_congr_left' 𝕜 (λ i : ι, E) e,
norm_map' := λ x,
begin
unfreezingI { rcases p.dichotomy with (rfl | h) },
{ simp_rw [norm_eq_csupr, linear_equiv.Pi_congr_left'_apply 𝕜 (λ i : ι, E) e x _],
exact e.symm.supr_congr (λ i, rfl) },
{ simp only [norm_eq_sum (zero_lt_one.trans_le h)],
simp_rw linear_equiv.Pi_congr_left'_apply 𝕜 (λ i : ι, E) e x _,
congr,
exact (fintype.sum_equiv (e.symm) _ _ (λ i, rfl)) }
end, }
variables {p 𝕜 E}
@[simp] lemma _root_.linear_isometry_equiv.pi_Lp_congr_left_apply
(e : ι ≃ ι') (v : pi_Lp p (λ i : ι, E)) :
linear_isometry_equiv.pi_Lp_congr_left p 𝕜 E e v = equiv.Pi_congr_left' (λ i : ι, E) e v :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma _root_.linear_isometry_equiv.pi_Lp_congr_left_symm (e : ι ≃ ι') :
(linear_isometry_equiv.pi_Lp_congr_left p 𝕜 E e).symm
= (linear_isometry_equiv.pi_Lp_congr_left p 𝕜 E e.symm) :=
linear_isometry_equiv.ext $ λ x, rfl
@[simp] lemma _root_.linear_isometry_equiv.pi_Lp_congr_left_single
[decidable_eq ι] [decidable_eq ι'] (e : ι ≃ ι') (i : ι) (v : E) :
linear_isometry_equiv.pi_Lp_congr_left p 𝕜 E e (pi.single i v) = pi.single (e i) v :=
begin
funext x,
simp [linear_isometry_equiv.pi_Lp_congr_left, linear_equiv.Pi_congr_left', equiv.Pi_congr_left',
pi.single, function.update, equiv.symm_apply_eq],
end
@[simp] lemma equiv_zero : pi_Lp.equiv p β 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma equiv_symm_zero : (pi_Lp.equiv p β).symm 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma equiv_add :
pi_Lp.equiv p β (x + y) = pi_Lp.equiv p β x + pi_Lp.equiv p β y := rfl
@[simp] lemma equiv_symm_add :
(pi_Lp.equiv p β).symm (x' + y') = (pi_Lp.equiv p β).symm x' + (pi_Lp.equiv p β).symm y' := rfl
@[simp] lemma equiv_sub : pi_Lp.equiv p β (x - y) = pi_Lp.equiv p β x - pi_Lp.equiv p β y := rfl
@[simp] lemma equiv_symm_sub :
(pi_Lp.equiv p β).symm (x' - y') = (pi_Lp.equiv p β).symm x' - (pi_Lp.equiv p β).symm y' := rfl
@[simp] lemma equiv_neg : pi_Lp.equiv p β (-x) = -pi_Lp.equiv p β x := rfl
@[simp] lemma equiv_symm_neg : (pi_Lp.equiv p β).symm (-x') = -(pi_Lp.equiv p β).symm x' := rfl
@[simp] lemma equiv_smul : pi_Lp.equiv p β (c • x) = c • pi_Lp.equiv p β x := rfl
@[simp] lemma equiv_symm_smul :
(pi_Lp.equiv p β).symm (c • x') = c • (pi_Lp.equiv p β).symm x' := rfl
/-- When `p = ∞`, this lemma does not hold without the additional assumption `nonempty ι` because
the left-hand side simplifies to `0`, while the right-hand side simplifies to `‖b‖₊`. See
`pi_Lp.nnnorm_equiv_symm_const'` for a version which exchanges the hypothesis `p ≠ ∞` for
`nonempty ι`. -/
lemma nnnorm_equiv_symm_const {β} [seminormed_add_comm_group β] (hp : p ≠ ∞) (b : β) :
‖(pi_Lp.equiv p (λ _ : ι, β)).symm (function.const _ b)‖₊=
fintype.card ι ^ (1 / p).to_real * ‖b‖₊ :=
begin
rcases p.dichotomy with (h | h),
{ exact false.elim (hp h) },
{ have ne_zero : p.to_real ≠ 0 := (zero_lt_one.trans_le h).ne',
simp_rw [nnnorm_eq_sum hp, equiv_symm_apply, function.const_apply, finset.sum_const,
finset.card_univ, nsmul_eq_mul, nnreal.mul_rpow, ←nnreal.rpow_mul, mul_one_div_cancel ne_zero,
nnreal.rpow_one, ennreal.to_real_div, ennreal.one_to_real], },
end
/-- When `is_empty ι`, this lemma does not hold without the additional assumption `p ≠ ∞` because
the left-hand side simplifies to `0`, while the right-hand side simplifies to `‖b‖₊`. See
`pi_Lp.nnnorm_equiv_symm_const` for a version which exchanges the hypothesis `nonempty ι`.
for `p ≠ ∞`. -/
lemma nnnorm_equiv_symm_const' {β} [seminormed_add_comm_group β] [nonempty ι] (b : β) :
‖(pi_Lp.equiv p (λ _ : ι, β)).symm (function.const _ b)‖₊=
fintype.card ι ^ (1 / p).to_real * ‖b‖₊ :=
begin
unfreezingI { rcases (em $ p = ∞) with (rfl | hp) },
{ simp only [equiv_symm_apply, ennreal.div_top, ennreal.zero_to_real, nnreal.rpow_zero, one_mul,
nnnorm_eq_csupr, function.const_apply, csupr_const], },
{ exact nnnorm_equiv_symm_const hp b, },
end
/-- When `p = ∞`, this lemma does not hold without the additional assumption `nonempty ι` because
the left-hand side simplifies to `0`, while the right-hand side simplifies to `‖b‖₊`. See
`pi_Lp.norm_equiv_symm_const'` for a version which exchanges the hypothesis `p ≠ ∞` for
`nonempty ι`. -/
lemma norm_equiv_symm_const {β} [seminormed_add_comm_group β] (hp : p ≠ ∞) (b : β) :
‖(pi_Lp.equiv p (λ _ : ι, β)).symm (function.const _ b)‖ =
fintype.card ι ^ (1 / p).to_real * ‖b‖ :=
(congr_arg coe $ nnnorm_equiv_symm_const hp b).trans $ by simp
/-- When `is_empty ι`, this lemma does not hold without the additional assumption `p ≠ ∞` because
the left-hand side simplifies to `0`, while the right-hand side simplifies to `‖b‖₊`. See
`pi_Lp.norm_equiv_symm_const` for a version which exchanges the hypothesis `nonempty ι`.
for `p ≠ ∞`. -/
lemma norm_equiv_symm_const' {β} [seminormed_add_comm_group β] [nonempty ι] (b : β) :
‖(pi_Lp.equiv p (λ _ : ι, β)).symm (function.const _ b)‖ =
fintype.card ι ^ (1 / p).to_real * ‖b‖ :=
(congr_arg coe $ nnnorm_equiv_symm_const' b).trans $ by simp
lemma nnnorm_equiv_symm_one {β} [seminormed_add_comm_group β] (hp : p ≠ ∞) [has_one β] :
‖(pi_Lp.equiv p (λ _ : ι, β)).symm 1‖₊ = fintype.card ι ^ (1 / p).to_real * ‖(1 : β)‖₊ :=
(nnnorm_equiv_symm_const hp (1 : β)).trans rfl
lemma norm_equiv_symm_one {β} [seminormed_add_comm_group β] (hp : p ≠ ∞) [has_one β] :
‖(pi_Lp.equiv p (λ _ : ι, β)).symm 1‖ = fintype.card ι ^ (1 / p).to_real * ‖(1 : β)‖ :=
(norm_equiv_symm_const hp (1 : β)).trans rfl
variables (𝕜 p)
/-- `pi_Lp.equiv` as a linear map. -/
@[simps {fully_applied := ff}]
protected def linear_equiv : pi_Lp p β ≃ₗ[𝕜] Π i, β i :=
{ to_fun := pi_Lp.equiv _ _,
inv_fun := (pi_Lp.equiv _ _).symm,
..linear_equiv.refl _ _}
section basis
variables (ι)
/-- A version of `pi.basis_fun` for `pi_Lp`. -/
def basis_fun : basis ι 𝕜 (pi_Lp p (λ _, 𝕜)) :=
basis.of_equiv_fun (pi_Lp.linear_equiv p 𝕜 (λ _ : ι, 𝕜))
@[simp] lemma basis_fun_apply [decidable_eq ι] (i) :
basis_fun p 𝕜 ι i = (pi_Lp.equiv p _).symm (pi.single i 1) :=
by simp_rw [basis_fun, basis.coe_of_equiv_fun, pi_Lp.linear_equiv_symm_apply, pi.single]
@[simp] lemma basis_fun_repr (x : pi_Lp p (λ i : ι, 𝕜)) (i : ι) :
(basis_fun p 𝕜 ι).repr x i = x i :=
rfl
lemma basis_fun_eq_pi_basis_fun :
basis_fun p 𝕜 ι = (pi.basis_fun 𝕜 ι).map (pi_Lp.linear_equiv p 𝕜 (λ _ : ι, 𝕜)).symm :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma basis_fun_map :
(basis_fun p 𝕜 ι).map (pi_Lp.linear_equiv p 𝕜 (λ _ : ι, 𝕜)) = pi.basis_fun 𝕜 ι :=
rfl
open_locale matrix
lemma basis_to_matrix_basis_fun_mul (b : basis ι 𝕜 (pi_Lp p (λ i : ι, 𝕜))) (A : matrix ι ι 𝕜) :
b.to_matrix (pi_Lp.basis_fun _ _ _) ⬝ A =
matrix.of (λ i j, b.repr ((pi_Lp.equiv _ _).symm (Aᵀ j)) i) :=
begin
have := basis_to_matrix_basis_fun_mul (b.map (pi_Lp.linear_equiv _ 𝕜 _)) A,
simp_rw [←pi_Lp.basis_fun_map p, basis.map_repr, linear_equiv.trans_apply,
pi_Lp.linear_equiv_symm_apply, basis.to_matrix_map, function.comp, basis.map_apply,
linear_equiv.symm_apply_apply] at this,
exact this,
end
end basis
end pi_Lp
|
b9b2901a071bc6c1aabc8d98fcea080c8ea9dc4c | 2a70b774d16dbdf5a533432ee0ebab6838df0948 | /_target/deps/mathlib/src/algebra/big_operators/order.lean | bdc3e34a9782d9c384661d97b5fe8e38c1aecb04 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | hjvromen/lewis | 40b035973df7c77ebf927afab7878c76d05ff758 | 105b675f73630f028ad5d890897a51b3c1146fb0 | refs/heads/master | 1,677,944,636,343 | 1,676,555,301,000 | 1,676,555,301,000 | 327,553,599 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,475 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import algebra.big_operators.basic
/-!
# Results about big operators with values in an ordered algebraic structure.
Mostly monotonicity results for the `∑` operation.
-/
universes u v w
open_locale big_operators
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
namespace finset
variables {s s₁ s₂ : finset α} {a : α} {f g : α → β}
lemma le_sum_of_subadditive [add_comm_monoid α] [ordered_add_comm_monoid β]
(f : α → β) (h_zero : f 0 = 0) (h_add : ∀x y, f (x + y) ≤ f x + f y) (s : finset γ) (g : γ → α) :
f (∑ x in s, g x) ≤ ∑ x in s, f (g x) :=
begin
refine le_trans (multiset.le_sum_of_subadditive f h_zero h_add _) _,
rw [multiset.map_map],
refl
end
lemma abs_sum_le_sum_abs [linear_ordered_field α] {f : β → α} {s : finset β} :
abs (∑ x in s, f x) ≤ ∑ x in s, abs (f x) :=
le_sum_of_subadditive _ abs_zero abs_add s f
lemma abs_prod [linear_ordered_comm_ring α] {f : β → α} {s : finset β} :
abs (∏ x in s, f x) = ∏ x in s, abs (f x) :=
(abs_hom.to_monoid_hom : α →* α).map_prod _ _
section ordered_add_comm_monoid
variables [ordered_add_comm_monoid β]
lemma sum_le_sum : (∀x∈s, f x ≤ g x) → (∑ x in s, f x) ≤ (∑ x in s, g x) :=
begin
classical,
apply finset.induction_on s,
exact (λ _, le_refl _),
assume a s ha ih h,
have : f a + (∑ x in s, f x) ≤ g a + (∑ x in s, g x),
from add_le_add (h _ (mem_insert_self _ _)) (ih $ assume x hx, h _ $ mem_insert_of_mem hx),
by simpa only [sum_insert ha]
end
theorem card_le_mul_card_image_of_maps_to [decidable_eq γ] {f : α → γ} {s : finset α} {t : finset γ}
(Hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t) (n : ℕ) (hn : ∀ a ∈ t, (s.filter (λ x, f x = a)).card ≤ n) :
s.card ≤ n * t.card :=
calc s.card = (∑ a in t, (s.filter (λ x, f x = a)).card) : card_eq_sum_card_fiberwise Hf
... ≤ (∑ _ in t, n) : sum_le_sum hn
... = _ : by simp [mul_comm]
theorem card_le_mul_card_image [decidable_eq γ] {f : α → γ} (s : finset α)
(n : ℕ) (hn : ∀ a ∈ s.image f, (s.filter (λ x, f x = a)).card ≤ n) :
s.card ≤ n * (s.image f).card :=
card_le_mul_card_image_of_maps_to (λ x, mem_image_of_mem _) n hn
theorem mul_card_image_le_card_of_maps_to [decidable_eq γ] {f : α → γ} {s : finset α} {t : finset γ}
(Hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t) (n : ℕ) (hn : ∀ a ∈ t, n ≤ (s.filter (λ x, f x = a)).card) :
n * t.card ≤ s.card :=
calc n * t.card = (∑ _ in t, n) : by simp [mul_comm]
... ≤ (∑ a in t, (s.filter (λ x, f x = a)).card) : sum_le_sum hn
... = s.card : by rw ← card_eq_sum_card_fiberwise Hf
theorem mul_card_image_le_card [decidable_eq γ] {f : α → γ} (s : finset α)
(n : ℕ) (hn : ∀ a ∈ s.image f, n ≤ (s.filter (λ x, f x = a)).card) :
n * (s.image f).card ≤ s.card :=
mul_card_image_le_card_of_maps_to (λ x, mem_image_of_mem _) n hn
lemma sum_nonneg (h : ∀x∈s, 0 ≤ f x) : 0 ≤ (∑ x in s, f x) :=
le_trans (by rw [sum_const_zero]) (sum_le_sum h)
lemma sum_nonpos (h : ∀x∈s, f x ≤ 0) : (∑ x in s, f x) ≤ 0 :=
le_trans (sum_le_sum h) (by rw [sum_const_zero])
lemma sum_le_sum_of_subset_of_nonneg
(h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hf : ∀x∈s₂, x ∉ s₁ → 0 ≤ f x) : (∑ x in s₁, f x) ≤ (∑ x in s₂, f x) :=
by classical;
calc (∑ x in s₁, f x) ≤ (∑ x in s₂ \ s₁, f x) + (∑ x in s₁, f x) :
le_add_of_nonneg_left $ sum_nonneg $ by simpa only [mem_sdiff, and_imp]
... = ∑ x in s₂ \ s₁ ∪ s₁, f x : (sum_union sdiff_disjoint).symm
... = (∑ x in s₂, f x) : by rw [sdiff_union_of_subset h]
lemma sum_mono_set_of_nonneg (hf : ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x) : monotone (λ s, ∑ x in s, f x) :=
λ s₁ s₂ hs, sum_le_sum_of_subset_of_nonneg hs $ λ x _ _, hf x
lemma sum_fiberwise_le_sum_of_sum_fiber_nonneg [decidable_eq γ] {s : finset α} {t : finset γ}
{g : α → γ} {f : α → β} (h : ∀ y ∉ t, (0 : β) ≤ ∑ x in s.filter (λ x, g x = y), f x) :
(∑ y in t, ∑ x in s.filter (λ x, g x = y), f x) ≤ ∑ x in s, f x :=
calc (∑ y in t, ∑ x in s.filter (λ x, g x = y), f x) ≤
(∑ y in t ∪ s.image g, ∑ x in s.filter (λ x, g x = y), f x) :
sum_le_sum_of_subset_of_nonneg (subset_union_left _ _) $ λ y hyts, h y
... = ∑ x in s, f x :
sum_fiberwise_of_maps_to (λ x hx, mem_union.2 $ or.inr $ mem_image_of_mem _ hx) _
lemma sum_le_sum_fiberwise_of_sum_fiber_nonpos [decidable_eq γ] {s : finset α} {t : finset γ}
{g : α → γ} {f : α → β} (h : ∀ y ∉ t, (∑ x in s.filter (λ x, g x = y), f x) ≤ 0) :
(∑ x in s, f x) ≤ ∑ y in t, ∑ x in s.filter (λ x, g x = y), f x :=
@sum_fiberwise_le_sum_of_sum_fiber_nonneg α (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ h
lemma sum_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg : (∀x∈s, 0 ≤ f x) → ((∑ x in s, f x) = 0 ↔ ∀x∈s, f x = 0) :=
begin
classical,
apply finset.induction_on s,
exact λ _, ⟨λ _ _, false.elim, λ _, rfl⟩,
assume a s ha ih H,
have : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 ≤ f x, from λ _, H _ ∘ mem_insert_of_mem,
rw [sum_insert ha, add_eq_zero_iff' (H _ $ mem_insert_self _ _) (sum_nonneg this),
forall_mem_insert, ih this]
end
lemma sum_eq_zero_iff_of_nonpos : (∀x∈s, f x ≤ 0) → ((∑ x in s, f x) = 0 ↔ ∀x∈s, f x = 0) :=
@sum_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg _ (order_dual β) _ _ _
lemma single_le_sum (hf : ∀x∈s, 0 ≤ f x) {a} (h : a ∈ s) : f a ≤ (∑ x in s, f x) :=
have ∑ x in {a}, f x ≤ (∑ x in s, f x),
from sum_le_sum_of_subset_of_nonneg
(λ x e, (mem_singleton.1 e).symm ▸ h) (λ x h _, hf x h),
by rwa sum_singleton at this
end ordered_add_comm_monoid
section canonically_ordered_add_monoid
variables [canonically_ordered_add_monoid β]
@[simp] lemma sum_eq_zero_iff : ∑ x in s, f x = 0 ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, f x = 0 :=
sum_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg $ λ x hx, zero_le (f x)
lemma sum_le_sum_of_subset (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : (∑ x in s₁, f x) ≤ (∑ x in s₂, f x) :=
sum_le_sum_of_subset_of_nonneg h $ assume x h₁ h₂, zero_le _
lemma sum_mono_set (f : α → β) : monotone (λ s, ∑ x in s, f x) :=
λ s₁ s₂ hs, sum_le_sum_of_subset hs
lemma sum_le_sum_of_ne_zero (h : ∀x∈s₁, f x ≠ 0 → x ∈ s₂) :
(∑ x in s₁, f x) ≤ (∑ x in s₂, f x) :=
by classical;
calc (∑ x in s₁, f x) = ∑ x in s₁.filter (λx, f x = 0), f x + ∑ x in s₁.filter (λx, f x ≠ 0), f x :
by rw [←sum_union, filter_union_filter_neg_eq];
exact disjoint_filter.2 (assume _ _ h n_h, n_h h)
... ≤ (∑ x in s₂, f x) : add_le_of_nonpos_of_le'
(sum_nonpos $ by simp only [mem_filter, and_imp]; exact λ _ _, le_of_eq)
(sum_le_sum_of_subset $ by simpa only [subset_iff, mem_filter, and_imp])
end canonically_ordered_add_monoid
section ordered_cancel_comm_monoid
variables [ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid β]
theorem sum_lt_sum (Hle : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ≤ g i) (Hlt : ∃ i ∈ s, f i < g i) :
(∑ x in s, f x) < (∑ x in s, g x) :=
begin
classical,
rcases Hlt with ⟨i, hi, hlt⟩,
rw [← insert_erase hi, sum_insert (not_mem_erase _ _), sum_insert (not_mem_erase _ _)],
exact add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le hlt (sum_le_sum $ λ j hj, Hle j $ mem_of_mem_erase hj)
end
lemma sum_lt_sum_of_nonempty (hs : s.nonempty) (Hlt : ∀ x ∈ s, f x < g x) :
(∑ x in s, f x) < (∑ x in s, g x) :=
begin
apply sum_lt_sum,
{ intros i hi, apply le_of_lt (Hlt i hi) },
cases hs with i hi,
exact ⟨i, hi, Hlt i hi⟩,
end
lemma sum_lt_sum_of_subset [decidable_eq α]
(h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) {i : α} (hi : i ∈ s₂ \ s₁) (hpos : 0 < f i) (hnonneg : ∀ j ∈ s₂ \ s₁, 0 ≤ f j) :
(∑ x in s₁, f x) < (∑ x in s₂, f x) :=
calc (∑ x in s₁, f x) < (∑ x in insert i s₁, f x) :
begin
simp only [mem_sdiff] at hi,
rw sum_insert hi.2,
exact lt_add_of_pos_left (∑ x in s₁, f x) hpos,
end
... ≤ (∑ x in s₂, f x) :
begin
simp only [mem_sdiff] at hi,
apply sum_le_sum_of_subset_of_nonneg,
{ simp [finset.insert_subset, h, hi.1] },
{ assume x hx h'x,
apply hnonneg x,
simp [mem_insert, not_or_distrib] at h'x,
rw mem_sdiff,
simp [hx, h'x] }
end
end ordered_cancel_comm_monoid
section linear_ordered_cancel_comm_monoid
variables [linear_ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid β]
theorem exists_lt_of_sum_lt (Hlt : (∑ x in s, f x) < ∑ x in s, g x) :
∃ i ∈ s, f i < g i :=
begin
contrapose! Hlt with Hle,
exact sum_le_sum Hle
end
theorem exists_le_of_sum_le (hs : s.nonempty) (Hle : (∑ x in s, f x) ≤ ∑ x in s, g x) :
∃ i ∈ s, f i ≤ g i :=
begin
contrapose! Hle with Hlt,
rcases hs with ⟨i, hi⟩,
exact sum_lt_sum (λ i hi, le_of_lt (Hlt i hi)) ⟨i, hi, Hlt i hi⟩
end
lemma exists_pos_of_sum_zero_of_exists_nonzero (f : α → β)
(h₁ : ∑ e in s, f e = 0) (h₂ : ∃ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0) :
∃ x ∈ s, 0 < f x :=
begin
contrapose! h₁,
obtain ⟨x, m, x_nz⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0 := h₂,
apply ne_of_lt,
calc ∑ e in s, f e < ∑ e in s, 0 : sum_lt_sum h₁ ⟨x, m, lt_of_le_of_ne (h₁ x m) x_nz⟩
... = 0 : by rw [finset.sum_const, nsmul_zero],
end
end linear_ordered_cancel_comm_monoid
section linear_ordered_comm_ring
variables [linear_ordered_comm_ring β]
open_locale classical
/- this is also true for a ordered commutative multiplicative monoid -/
lemma prod_nonneg {s : finset α} {f : α → β}
(h0 : ∀(x ∈ s), 0 ≤ f x) : 0 ≤ (∏ x in s, f x) :=
prod_induction f (λ x, 0 ≤ x) (λ _ _ ha hb, mul_nonneg ha hb) zero_le_one h0
/- this is also true for a ordered commutative multiplicative monoid -/
lemma prod_pos {s : finset α} {f : α → β} (h0 : ∀(x ∈ s), 0 < f x) : 0 < (∏ x in s, f x) :=
prod_induction f (λ x, 0 < x) (λ _ _ ha hb, mul_pos ha hb) zero_lt_one h0
/- this is also true for a ordered commutative multiplicative monoid -/
lemma prod_le_prod {s : finset α} {f g : α → β} (h0 : ∀(x ∈ s), 0 ≤ f x)
(h1 : ∀(x ∈ s), f x ≤ g x) : (∏ x in s, f x) ≤ (∏ x in s, g x) :=
begin
induction s using finset.induction with a s has ih h,
{ simp },
{ simp [has], apply mul_le_mul,
exact h1 a (mem_insert_self a s),
apply ih (λ x H, h0 _ _) (λ x H, h1 _ _); exact (mem_insert_of_mem H),
apply prod_nonneg (λ x H, h0 x (mem_insert_of_mem H)),
apply le_trans (h0 a (mem_insert_self a s)) (h1 a (mem_insert_self a s)) }
end
lemma prod_le_one {s : finset α} {f : α → β} (h0 : ∀(x ∈ s), 0 ≤ f x)
(h1 : ∀(x ∈ s), f x ≤ 1) : (∏ x in s, f x) ≤ 1 :=
begin
convert ← prod_le_prod h0 h1,
exact finset.prod_const_one
end
/-- If `g, h ≤ f` and `g i + h i ≤ f i`, then the product of `f` over `s` is at least the
sum of the products of `g` and `h`. This is the version for `linear_ordered_comm_ring`. -/
lemma prod_add_prod_le {s : finset α} {i : α} {f g h : α → β}
(hi : i ∈ s) (h2i : g i + h i ≤ f i) (hgf : ∀ j ∈ s, j ≠ i → g j ≤ f j)
(hhf : ∀ j ∈ s, j ≠ i → h j ≤ f j) (hg : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ g i) (hh : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ h i) :
∏ i in s, g i + ∏ i in s, h i ≤ ∏ i in s, f i :=
begin
simp_rw [← mul_prod_diff_singleton hi],
refine le_trans _ (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h2i _),
{ rw [right_distrib],
apply add_le_add; apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left; try { apply prod_le_prod };
simp only [and_imp, mem_sdiff, mem_singleton]; intros; apply_assumption; assumption },
{ apply prod_nonneg, simp only [and_imp, mem_sdiff, mem_singleton],
intros j h1j h2j, refine le_trans (hg j h1j) (hgf j h1j h2j) }
end
end linear_ordered_comm_ring
section canonically_ordered_comm_semiring
variables [canonically_ordered_comm_semiring β]
lemma prod_le_prod' {s : finset α} {f g : α → β} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ≤ g i) :
(∏ x in s, f x) ≤ (∏ x in s, g x) :=
begin
classical,
induction s using finset.induction with a s has ih h,
{ simp },
{ rw [finset.prod_insert has, finset.prod_insert has],
apply canonically_ordered_semiring.mul_le_mul,
{ exact h _ (finset.mem_insert_self a s) },
{ exact ih (λ i hi, h _ (finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)) } }
end
/-- If `g, h ≤ f` and `g i + h i ≤ f i`, then the product of `f` over `s` is at least the
sum of the products of `g` and `h`. This is the version for `canonically_ordered_comm_semiring`.
-/
lemma prod_add_prod_le' {s : finset α} {i : α} {f g h : α → β} (hi : i ∈ s) (h2i : g i + h i ≤ f i)
(hgf : ∀ j ∈ s, j ≠ i → g j ≤ f j) (hhf : ∀ j ∈ s, j ≠ i → h j ≤ f j) :
∏ i in s, g i + ∏ i in s, h i ≤ ∏ i in s, f i :=
begin
classical, simp_rw [← mul_prod_diff_singleton hi],
refine le_trans _ (canonically_ordered_semiring.mul_le_mul_right' h2i _),
rw [right_distrib],
apply add_le_add; apply canonically_ordered_semiring.mul_le_mul_left'; apply prod_le_prod';
simp only [and_imp, mem_sdiff, mem_singleton]; intros; apply_assumption; assumption
end
end canonically_ordered_comm_semiring
end finset
namespace with_top
open finset
/-- A product of finite numbers is still finite -/
lemma prod_lt_top [canonically_ordered_comm_semiring β] [nontrivial β] [decidable_eq β]
{s : finset α} {f : α → with_top β} (h : ∀ a ∈ s, f a < ⊤) :
(∏ x in s, f x) < ⊤ :=
prod_induction f (λ a, a < ⊤) (λ a b, mul_lt_top) (coe_lt_top 1) h
/-- A sum of finite numbers is still finite -/
lemma sum_lt_top [ordered_add_comm_monoid β] {s : finset α} {f : α → with_top β} :
(∀a∈s, f a < ⊤) → (∑ x in s, f x) < ⊤ :=
λ h, sum_induction f (λ a, a < ⊤) (by { simp_rw add_lt_top, tauto }) zero_lt_top h
/-- A sum of finite numbers is still finite -/
lemma sum_lt_top_iff [canonically_ordered_add_monoid β] {s : finset α} {f : α → with_top β} :
(∑ x in s, f x) < ⊤ ↔ (∀a∈s, f a < ⊤) :=
iff.intro (λh a ha, lt_of_le_of_lt (single_le_sum (λa ha, zero_le _) ha) h) sum_lt_top
/-- A sum of numbers is infinite iff one of them is infinite -/
lemma sum_eq_top_iff [canonically_ordered_add_monoid β] {s : finset α} {f : α → with_top β} :
(∑ x in s, f x) = ⊤ ↔ (∃a∈s, f a = ⊤) :=
begin
rw ← not_iff_not,
push_neg,
simp only [← lt_top_iff_ne_top],
exact sum_lt_top_iff
end
end with_top
|
990b035d83979adc19819f97f891b899144bb35b | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/combinatorics/simple_graph/degree_sum.lean | b31e89db0ce7e420f86b24f5a03bf551c950f5a0 | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,781 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kyle Miller. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Kyle Miller
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.combinatorics.simple_graph.basic
import Mathlib.algebra.big_operators.basic
import Mathlib.data.nat.parity
import Mathlib.data.zmod.parity
import Mathlib.tactic.omega.default
import Mathlib.PostPort
universes u l
namespace Mathlib
/-!
# Degree-sum formula and handshaking lemma
The degree-sum formula is that the sum of the degrees of the vertices in
a finite graph is equal to twice the number of edges. The handshaking lemma,
a corollary, is that the number of odd-degree vertices is even.
## Main definitions
- A `dart` is a directed edge, consisting of an ordered pair of adjacent vertices,
thought of as being a directed edge.
- `simple_graph.sum_degrees_eq_twice_card_edges` is the degree-sum formula.
- `simple_graph.even_card_odd_degree_vertices` is the handshaking lemma.
- `simple_graph.odd_card_odd_degree_vertices_ne` is that the number of odd-degree
vertices different from a given odd-degree vertex is odd.
- `simple_graph.exists_ne_odd_degree_of_exists_odd_degree` is that the existence of an
odd-degree vertex implies the existence of another one.
## Implementation notes
We give a combinatorial proof by using the facts that (1) the map from
darts to vertices is such that each fiber has cardinality the degree
of the corresponding vertex and that (2) the map from darts to edges is 2-to-1.
## Tags
simple graphs, sums, degree-sum formula, handshaking lemma
-/
namespace simple_graph
/-- A dart is a directed edge, consisting of an ordered pair of adjacent vertices. -/
structure dart {V : Type u} (G : simple_graph V)
where
fst : V
snd : V
is_adj : adj G fst snd
protected instance dart.fintype {V : Type u} (G : simple_graph V) [fintype V] [DecidableRel (adj G)] : fintype (dart G) :=
fintype.of_equiv (sigma fun (v : V) => ↥(neighbor_set G v))
(equiv.mk (fun (s : sigma fun (v : V) => ↥(neighbor_set G v)) => dart.mk (sigma.fst s) ↑(sigma.snd s) sorry)
(fun (d : dart G) => sigma.mk (dart.fst d) { val := dart.snd d, property := dart.is_adj d }) sorry sorry)
/-- The edge associated to the dart. -/
def dart.edge {V : Type u} {G : simple_graph V} (d : dart G) : sym2 V :=
quotient.mk (dart.fst d, dart.snd d)
@[simp] theorem dart.edge_mem {V : Type u} {G : simple_graph V} (d : dart G) : dart.edge d ∈ edge_set G :=
dart.is_adj d
/-- The dart with reversed orientation from a given dart. -/
def dart.rev {V : Type u} {G : simple_graph V} (d : dart G) : dart G :=
dart.mk (dart.snd d) (dart.fst d) sorry
@[simp] theorem dart.rev_edge {V : Type u} {G : simple_graph V} (d : dart G) : dart.edge (dart.rev d) = dart.edge d :=
sym2.eq_swap
@[simp] theorem dart.rev_rev {V : Type u} {G : simple_graph V} (d : dart G) : dart.rev (dart.rev d) = d :=
dart.ext (dart.rev (dart.rev d)) d rfl rfl
@[simp] theorem dart.rev_involutive {V : Type u} {G : simple_graph V} : function.involutive dart.rev :=
dart.rev_rev
theorem dart.rev_ne {V : Type u} {G : simple_graph V} (d : dart G) : dart.rev d ≠ d := sorry
theorem dart_edge_eq_iff {V : Type u} {G : simple_graph V} (d₁ : dart G) (d₂ : dart G) : dart.edge d₁ = dart.edge d₂ ↔ d₁ = d₂ ∨ d₁ = dart.rev d₂ := sorry
/-- For a given vertex `v`, this is the bijective map from the neighbor set at `v`
to the darts `d` with `d.fst = v`. --/
def dart_of_neighbor_set {V : Type u} (G : simple_graph V) (v : V) (w : ↥(neighbor_set G v)) : dart G :=
dart.mk v ↑w sorry
theorem dart_of_neighbor_set_injective {V : Type u} (G : simple_graph V) (v : V) : function.injective (dart_of_neighbor_set G v) :=
fun (e₁ e₂ : ↥(neighbor_set G v)) (h : dart_of_neighbor_set G v e₁ = dart_of_neighbor_set G v e₂) =>
dart.mk.inj_arrow h fun (h₁ : v = v) (h₂ : ↑e₁ = ↑e₂) => subtype.ext h₂
protected instance dart.inhabited {V : Type u} (G : simple_graph V) [Inhabited V] [Inhabited ↥(neighbor_set G Inhabited.default)] : Inhabited (dart G) :=
{ default := dart_of_neighbor_set G Inhabited.default Inhabited.default }
theorem dart_fst_fiber {V : Type u} (G : simple_graph V) [fintype V] [DecidableRel (adj G)] [DecidableEq V] (v : V) : finset.filter (fun (d : dart G) => dart.fst d = v) finset.univ = finset.image (dart_of_neighbor_set G v) finset.univ := sorry
theorem dart_fst_fiber_card_eq_degree {V : Type u} (G : simple_graph V) [fintype V] [DecidableRel (adj G)] [DecidableEq V] (v : V) : finset.card (finset.filter (fun (d : dart G) => dart.fst d = v) finset.univ) = degree G v := sorry
theorem dart_card_eq_sum_degrees {V : Type u} (G : simple_graph V) [fintype V] [DecidableRel (adj G)] : fintype.card (dart G) = finset.sum finset.univ fun (v : V) => degree G v := sorry
theorem dart.edge_fiber {V : Type u} {G : simple_graph V} [fintype V] [DecidableRel (adj G)] [DecidableEq V] (d : dart G) : finset.filter (fun (d' : dart G) => dart.edge d' = dart.edge d) finset.univ = insert d (singleton (dart.rev d)) := sorry
theorem dart_edge_fiber_card {V : Type u} (G : simple_graph V) [fintype V] [DecidableRel (adj G)] [DecidableEq V] (e : sym2 V) (h : e ∈ edge_set G) : finset.card (finset.filter (fun (d : dart G) => dart.edge d = e) finset.univ) = bit0 1 := sorry
theorem dart_card_eq_twice_card_edges {V : Type u} (G : simple_graph V) [fintype V] [DecidableRel (adj G)] [DecidableEq V] : fintype.card (dart G) = bit0 1 * finset.card (edge_finset G) := sorry
/-- The degree-sum formula. This is also known as the handshaking lemma, which might
more specifically refer to `simple_graph.even_card_odd_degree_vertices`. -/
theorem sum_degrees_eq_twice_card_edges {V : Type u} (G : simple_graph V) [fintype V] [DecidableRel (adj G)] [DecidableEq V] : (finset.sum finset.univ fun (v : V) => degree G v) = bit0 1 * finset.card (edge_finset G) :=
Eq.trans (Eq.symm (dart_card_eq_sum_degrees G)) (dart_card_eq_twice_card_edges G)
/-- The handshaking lemma. See also `simple_graph.sum_degrees_eq_twice_card_edges`. -/
theorem even_card_odd_degree_vertices {V : Type u} (G : simple_graph V) [fintype V] [DecidableRel (adj G)] : even (finset.card (finset.filter (fun (v : V) => odd (degree G v)) finset.univ)) := sorry
theorem odd_card_odd_degree_vertices_ne {V : Type u} (G : simple_graph V) [fintype V] [DecidableEq V] [DecidableRel (adj G)] (v : V) (h : odd (degree G v)) : odd (finset.card (finset.filter (fun (w : V) => w ≠ v ∧ odd (degree G w)) finset.univ)) := sorry
theorem exists_ne_odd_degree_of_exists_odd_degree {V : Type u} (G : simple_graph V) [fintype V] [DecidableRel (adj G)] (v : V) (h : odd (degree G v)) : ∃ (w : V), w ≠ v ∧ odd (degree G w) := sorry
|
d3526963e1303e79a4c8c2e80156fb77d2a0492b | 3f7026ea8bef0825ca0339a275c03b911baef64d | /src/data/rat/basic.lean | 267f956ee5a5cdf0484e4f0e09d799eff5254b02 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | rspencer01/mathlib | b1e3afa5c121362ef0881012cc116513ab09f18c | c7d36292c6b9234dc40143c16288932ae38fdc12 | refs/heads/master | 1,595,010,346,708 | 1,567,511,503,000 | 1,567,511,503,000 | 206,071,681 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,567,513,643,000 | 1,567,513,643,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 24,929 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import
data.nat.gcd
data.pnat.basic data.int.sqrt data.equiv.encodable
algebra.group algebra.ordered_group algebra.group_power
algebra.ordered_field
tactic.norm_cast
tactic.lift
/-!
# Basics for the Rational Numbers
## Summary
We define a rational number `q` as a structure `{ num, denom, pos, cop }`, where
- `num` is the numerator of `q`,
- `denom` is the denominator of `q`,
- `pos` is a proof that `denom > 0`, and
- `cop` is a proof `num` and `denom` are coprime.
We then define the expected (discrete) field structure on `ℚ` and prove basic lemmas about it.
Moreoever, we provide the expected casts from `ℕ` and `ℤ` into `ℚ`, i.e. `(↑n : ℚ) = n / 1`.
## Main Definitions
- `rat` is the structure encoding `ℚ`.
- `rat.mk n d` constructs a rational number `q = n / d` from `n d : ℤ`.
## Notations
- `/.` is infix notation for `rat.mk`.
## Tags
rat, rationals, field, ℚ, numerator, denominator, num, denom
-/
/-- `rat`, or `ℚ`, is the type of rational numbers. It is defined
as the set of pairs ⟨n, d⟩ of integers such that `d` is positive and `n` and
`d` are coprime. This representation is preferred to the quotient
because without periodic reduction, the numerator and denominator can grow
exponentially (for example, adding 1/2 to itself repeatedly). -/
structure rat := mk' ::
(num : ℤ)
(denom : ℕ)
(pos : denom > 0)
(cop : num.nat_abs.coprime denom)
notation `ℚ` := rat
namespace rat
protected def repr : ℚ → string
| ⟨n, d, _, _⟩ := if d = 1 then _root_.repr n else
_root_.repr n ++ "/" ++ _root_.repr d
instance : has_repr ℚ := ⟨rat.repr⟩
instance : has_to_string ℚ := ⟨rat.repr⟩
meta instance : has_to_format ℚ := ⟨coe ∘ rat.repr⟩
instance : encodable ℚ := encodable.of_equiv (Σ n : ℤ, {d : ℕ // d > 0 ∧ n.nat_abs.coprime d})
⟨λ ⟨a, b, c, d⟩, ⟨a, b, c, d⟩, λ⟨a, b, c, d⟩, ⟨a, b, c, d⟩,
λ ⟨a, b, c, d⟩, rfl, λ⟨a, b, c, d⟩, rfl⟩
/-- Embed an integer as a rational number -/
def of_int (n : ℤ) : ℚ :=
⟨n, 1, nat.one_pos, nat.coprime_one_right _⟩
instance : has_zero ℚ := ⟨of_int 0⟩
instance : has_one ℚ := ⟨of_int 1⟩
instance : inhabited ℚ := ⟨0⟩
/-- Form the quotient `n / d` where `n:ℤ` and `d:ℕ+` (not necessarily coprime) -/
def mk_pnat (n : ℤ) : ℕ+ → ℚ | ⟨d, dpos⟩ :=
let n' := n.nat_abs, g := n'.gcd d in
⟨n / g, d / g, begin
apply (nat.le_div_iff_mul_le _ _ (nat.gcd_pos_of_pos_right _ dpos)).2,
simp, exact nat.le_of_dvd dpos (nat.gcd_dvd_right _ _)
end, begin
have : int.nat_abs (n / ↑g) = n' / g,
{ cases int.nat_abs_eq n with e e; rw e, { refl },
rw [int.neg_div_of_dvd, int.nat_abs_neg], { refl },
exact int.coe_nat_dvd.2 (nat.gcd_dvd_left _ _) },
rw this,
exact nat.coprime_div_gcd_div_gcd (nat.gcd_pos_of_pos_right _ dpos)
end⟩
/-- Form the quotient `n / d` where `n:ℤ` and `d:ℕ`. In the case `d = 0`, we
define `n / 0 = 0` by convention. -/
def mk_nat (n : ℤ) (d : ℕ) : ℚ :=
if d0 : d = 0 then 0 else mk_pnat n ⟨d, nat.pos_of_ne_zero d0⟩
/-- Form the quotient `n / d` where `n d : ℤ`. -/
def mk : ℤ → ℤ → ℚ
| n (int.of_nat d) := mk_nat n d
| n -[1+ d] := mk_pnat (-n) d.succ_pnat
local infix ` /. `:70 := mk
theorem mk_pnat_eq (n d h) : mk_pnat n ⟨d, h⟩ = n /. d :=
by change n /. d with dite _ _ _; simp [ne_of_gt h]
theorem mk_nat_eq (n d) : mk_nat n d = n /. d := rfl
@[simp] theorem mk_zero (n) : n /. 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem zero_mk_pnat (n) : mk_pnat 0 n = 0 :=
by cases n; simp [mk_pnat]; change int.nat_abs 0 with 0; simp *; refl
@[simp] theorem zero_mk_nat (n) : mk_nat 0 n = 0 :=
by by_cases n = 0; simp [*, mk_nat]
@[simp] theorem zero_mk (n) : 0 /. n = 0 :=
by cases n; simp [mk]
private lemma gcd_abs_dvd_left {a b} : (nat.gcd (int.nat_abs a) b : ℤ) ∣ a :=
int.dvd_nat_abs.1 $ int.coe_nat_dvd.2 $ nat.gcd_dvd_left (int.nat_abs a) b
@[simp] theorem mk_eq_zero {a b : ℤ} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a /. b = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
begin
constructor; intro h; [skip, {subst a, simp}],
have : ∀ {a b}, mk_pnat a b = 0 → a = 0,
{ intros a b e, cases b with b h,
injection e with e,
apply int.eq_mul_of_div_eq_right gcd_abs_dvd_left e },
cases b with b; simp [mk, mk_nat] at h,
{ simp [mt (congr_arg int.of_nat) b0] at h,
exact this h },
{ apply neg_inj, simp [this h] }
end
theorem mk_eq : ∀ {a b c d : ℤ} (hb : b ≠ 0) (hd : d ≠ 0),
a /. b = c /. d ↔ a * d = c * b :=
suffices ∀ a b c d hb hd, mk_pnat a ⟨b, hb⟩ = mk_pnat c ⟨d, hd⟩ ↔ a * d = c * b,
begin
intros, cases b with b b; simp [mk, mk_nat, nat.succ_pnat],
simp [mt (congr_arg int.of_nat) hb],
all_goals {
cases d with d d; simp [mk, mk_nat, nat.succ_pnat],
simp [mt (congr_arg int.of_nat) hd],
all_goals { rw this, try {refl} } },
{ change a * ↑(d.succ) = -c * ↑b ↔ a * -(d.succ) = c * b,
constructor; intro h; apply neg_inj; simpa [left_distrib, neg_add_eq_iff_eq_add,
eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, neg_eq_iff_add_eq_zero] using h },
{ change -a * ↑d = c * b.succ ↔ a * d = c * -b.succ,
constructor; intro h; apply neg_inj; simpa [left_distrib, eq_comm] using h },
{ change -a * d.succ = -c * b.succ ↔ a * -d.succ = c * -b.succ,
simp [left_distrib] }
end,
begin
intros, simp [mk_pnat], constructor; intro h,
{ cases h with ha hb,
have ha, {
have dv := @gcd_abs_dvd_left,
have := int.eq_mul_of_div_eq_right dv ha,
rw ← int.mul_div_assoc _ dv at this,
exact int.eq_mul_of_div_eq_left (dvd_mul_of_dvd_right dv _) this.symm },
have hb, {
have dv := λ {a b}, nat.gcd_dvd_right (int.nat_abs a) b,
have := nat.eq_mul_of_div_eq_right dv hb,
rw ← nat.mul_div_assoc _ dv at this,
exact nat.eq_mul_of_div_eq_left (dvd_mul_of_dvd_right dv _) this.symm },
have m0 : (a.nat_abs.gcd b * c.nat_abs.gcd d : ℤ) ≠ 0, {
refine int.coe_nat_ne_zero.2 (ne_of_gt _),
apply mul_pos; apply nat.gcd_pos_of_pos_right; assumption },
apply eq_of_mul_eq_mul_right m0,
simpa [mul_comm, mul_left_comm] using
congr (congr_arg (*) ha.symm) (congr_arg coe hb) },
{ suffices : ∀ a c, a * d = c * b →
a / a.gcd b = c / c.gcd d ∧ b / a.gcd b = d / c.gcd d,
{ cases this a.nat_abs c.nat_abs
(by simpa [int.nat_abs_mul] using congr_arg int.nat_abs h) with h₁ h₂,
have hs := congr_arg int.sign h,
simp [int.sign_eq_one_of_pos (int.coe_nat_lt.2 hb),
int.sign_eq_one_of_pos (int.coe_nat_lt.2 hd)] at hs,
conv in a { rw ← int.sign_mul_nat_abs a },
conv in c { rw ← int.sign_mul_nat_abs c },
rw [int.mul_div_assoc, int.mul_div_assoc],
exact ⟨congr (congr_arg (*) hs) (congr_arg coe h₁), h₂⟩,
all_goals { exact int.coe_nat_dvd.2 (nat.gcd_dvd_left _ _) } },
intros a c h,
suffices bd : b / a.gcd b = d / c.gcd d,
{ refine ⟨_, bd⟩,
apply nat.eq_of_mul_eq_mul_left hb,
rw [← nat.mul_div_assoc _ (nat.gcd_dvd_left _ _), mul_comm,
nat.mul_div_assoc _ (nat.gcd_dvd_right _ _), bd,
← nat.mul_div_assoc _ (nat.gcd_dvd_right _ _), h, mul_comm,
nat.mul_div_assoc _ (nat.gcd_dvd_left _ _)] },
suffices : ∀ {a c : ℕ} (b>0) (d>0),
a * d = c * b → b / a.gcd b ≤ d / c.gcd d,
{ exact le_antisymm (this _ hb _ hd h) (this _ hd _ hb h.symm) },
intros a c b hb d hd h,
have gb0 := nat.gcd_pos_of_pos_right a hb,
have gd0 := nat.gcd_pos_of_pos_right c hd,
apply nat.le_of_dvd,
apply (nat.le_div_iff_mul_le _ _ gd0).2,
simp, apply nat.le_of_dvd hd (nat.gcd_dvd_right _ _),
apply (nat.coprime_div_gcd_div_gcd gb0).symm.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left,
refine ⟨c / c.gcd d, _⟩,
rw [← nat.mul_div_assoc _ (nat.gcd_dvd_left _ _),
← nat.mul_div_assoc _ (nat.gcd_dvd_right _ _)],
apply congr_arg (/ c.gcd d),
rw [mul_comm, ← nat.mul_div_assoc _ (nat.gcd_dvd_left _ _),
mul_comm, h, nat.mul_div_assoc _ (nat.gcd_dvd_right _ _), mul_comm] }
end
@[simp] theorem div_mk_div_cancel_left {a b c : ℤ} (c0 : c ≠ 0) :
(a * c) /. (b * c) = a /. b :=
begin
by_cases b0 : b = 0, { subst b0, simp },
apply (mk_eq (mul_ne_zero b0 c0) b0).2, simp [mul_comm, mul_assoc]
end
@[simp] theorem num_denom : ∀ {a : ℚ}, a.num /. a.denom = a
| ⟨n, d, h, (c:_=1)⟩ := show mk_nat n d = _,
by simp [mk_nat, ne_of_gt h, mk_pnat, c]
theorem num_denom' {n d h c} : (⟨n, d, h, c⟩ : ℚ) = n /. d := num_denom.symm
theorem of_int_eq_mk (z : ℤ) : of_int z = z /. 1 := num_denom'
@[elab_as_eliminator] theorem {u} num_denom_cases_on {C : ℚ → Sort u}
: ∀ (a : ℚ) (H : ∀ n d, d > 0 → (int.nat_abs n).coprime d → C (n /. d)), C a
| ⟨n, d, h, c⟩ H := by rw num_denom'; exact H n d h c
@[elab_as_eliminator] theorem {u} num_denom_cases_on' {C : ℚ → Sort u}
(a : ℚ) (H : ∀ (n:ℤ) (d:ℕ), d ≠ 0 → C (n /. d)) : C a :=
num_denom_cases_on a $ λ n d h c,
H n d $ ne_of_gt h
theorem num_dvd (a) {b : ℤ} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : (a /. b).num ∣ a :=
begin
cases e : a /. b with n d h c,
rw [rat.num_denom', rat.mk_eq b0
(ne_of_gt (int.coe_nat_pos.2 h))] at e,
refine (int.nat_abs_dvd.1 $ int.dvd_nat_abs.1 $ int.coe_nat_dvd.2 $
c.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right _),
have := congr_arg int.nat_abs e,
simp [int.nat_abs_mul, int.nat_abs_of_nat] at this, simp [this]
end
theorem denom_dvd (a b : ℤ) : ((a /. b).denom : ℤ) ∣ b :=
begin
by_cases b0 : b = 0, {simp [b0]},
cases e : a /. b with n d h c,
rw [num_denom', mk_eq b0 (ne_of_gt (int.coe_nat_pos.2 h))] at e,
refine (int.dvd_nat_abs.1 $ int.coe_nat_dvd.2 $ c.symm.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left _),
rw [← int.nat_abs_mul, ← int.coe_nat_dvd, int.dvd_nat_abs, ← e], simp
end
protected def add : ℚ → ℚ → ℚ
| ⟨n₁, d₁, h₁, c₁⟩ ⟨n₂, d₂, h₂, c₂⟩ := mk_pnat (n₁ * d₂ + n₂ * d₁) ⟨d₁ * d₂, mul_pos h₁ h₂⟩
instance : has_add ℚ := ⟨rat.add⟩
theorem lift_binop_eq (f : ℚ → ℚ → ℚ) (f₁ : ℤ → ℤ → ℤ → ℤ → ℤ) (f₂ : ℤ → ℤ → ℤ → ℤ → ℤ)
(fv : ∀ {n₁ d₁ h₁ c₁ n₂ d₂ h₂ c₂},
f ⟨n₁, d₁, h₁, c₁⟩ ⟨n₂, d₂, h₂, c₂⟩ = f₁ n₁ d₁ n₂ d₂ /. f₂ n₁ d₁ n₂ d₂)
(f0 : ∀ {n₁ d₁ n₂ d₂} (d₁0 : d₁ ≠ 0) (d₂0 : d₂ ≠ 0), f₂ n₁ d₁ n₂ d₂ ≠ 0)
(a b c d : ℤ) (b0 : b ≠ 0) (d0 : d ≠ 0)
(H : ∀ {n₁ d₁ n₂ d₂} (h₁ : a * d₁ = n₁ * b) (h₂ : c * d₂ = n₂ * d),
f₁ n₁ d₁ n₂ d₂ * f₂ a b c d = f₁ a b c d * f₂ n₁ d₁ n₂ d₂) :
f (a /. b) (c /. d) = f₁ a b c d /. f₂ a b c d :=
begin
generalize ha : a /. b = x, cases x with n₁ d₁ h₁ c₁, rw num_denom' at ha,
generalize hc : c /. d = x, cases x with n₂ d₂ h₂ c₂, rw num_denom' at hc,
rw fv,
have d₁0 := ne_of_gt (int.coe_nat_lt.2 h₁),
have d₂0 := ne_of_gt (int.coe_nat_lt.2 h₂),
exact (mk_eq (f0 d₁0 d₂0) (f0 b0 d0)).2 (H ((mk_eq b0 d₁0).1 ha) ((mk_eq d0 d₂0).1 hc))
end
@[simp] theorem add_def {a b c d : ℤ} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (d0 : d ≠ 0) :
a /. b + c /. d = (a * d + c * b) /. (b * d) :=
begin
apply lift_binop_eq rat.add; intros; try {assumption},
{ apply mk_pnat_eq },
{ apply mul_ne_zero d₁0 d₂0 },
calc (n₁ * d₂ + n₂ * d₁) * (b * d) =
(n₁ * b) * d₂ * d + (n₂ * d) * (d₁ * b) : by simp [mul_add, mul_comm, mul_left_comm]
... = (a * d₁) * d₂ * d + (c * d₂) * (d₁ * b) : by rw [h₁, h₂]
... = (a * d + c * b) * (d₁ * d₂) : by simp [mul_add, mul_comm, mul_left_comm]
end
protected def neg : ℚ → ℚ
| ⟨n, d, h, c⟩ := ⟨-n, d, h, by simp [c]⟩
instance : has_neg ℚ := ⟨rat.neg⟩
@[simp] theorem neg_def {a b : ℤ} : -(a /. b) = -a /. b :=
begin
by_cases b0 : b = 0, { subst b0, simp, refl },
generalize ha : a /. b = x, cases x with n₁ d₁ h₁ c₁, rw num_denom' at ha,
show rat.mk' _ _ _ _ = _, rw num_denom',
have d0 := ne_of_gt (int.coe_nat_lt.2 h₁),
apply (mk_eq d0 b0).2, have h₁ := (mk_eq b0 d0).1 ha,
simp only [neg_mul_eq_neg_mul_symm, congr_arg has_neg.neg h₁]
end
protected def mul : ℚ → ℚ → ℚ
| ⟨n₁, d₁, h₁, c₁⟩ ⟨n₂, d₂, h₂, c₂⟩ := mk_pnat (n₁ * n₂) ⟨d₁ * d₂, mul_pos h₁ h₂⟩
instance : has_mul ℚ := ⟨rat.mul⟩
@[simp] theorem mul_def {a b c d : ℤ} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (d0 : d ≠ 0) :
(a /. b) * (c /. d) = (a * c) /. (b * d) :=
begin
apply lift_binop_eq rat.mul; intros; try {assumption},
{ apply mk_pnat_eq },
{ apply mul_ne_zero d₁0 d₂0 },
cc
end
protected def inv : ℚ → ℚ
| ⟨(n+1:ℕ), d, h, c⟩ := ⟨d, n+1, n.succ_pos, c.symm⟩
| ⟨0, d, h, c⟩ := 0
| ⟨-[1+ n], d, h, c⟩ := ⟨-d, n+1, n.succ_pos, nat.coprime.symm $ by simp; exact c⟩
instance : has_inv ℚ := ⟨rat.inv⟩
@[simp] theorem inv_def {a b : ℤ} : (a /. b)⁻¹ = b /. a :=
begin
by_cases a0 : a = 0, { subst a0, simp, refl },
by_cases b0 : b = 0, { subst b0, simp, refl },
generalize ha : a /. b = x, cases x with n d h c, rw num_denom' at ha,
refine eq.trans (_ : rat.inv ⟨n, d, h, c⟩ = d /. n) _,
{ cases n with n; [cases n with n, skip],
{ refl },
{ change int.of_nat n.succ with (n+1:ℕ),
unfold rat.inv, rw num_denom' },
{ unfold rat.inv, rw num_denom', refl } },
have n0 : n ≠ 0,
{ refine mt (λ (n0 : n = 0), _) a0,
subst n0, simp at ha,
exact (mk_eq_zero b0).1 ha },
have d0 := ne_of_gt (int.coe_nat_lt.2 h),
have ha := (mk_eq b0 d0).1 ha,
apply (mk_eq n0 a0).2,
cc
end
variables (a b c : ℚ)
protected theorem add_zero : a + 0 = a :=
num_denom_cases_on' a $ λ n d h,
by rw [← zero_mk d]; simp [h, -zero_mk]
protected theorem zero_add : 0 + a = a :=
num_denom_cases_on' a $ λ n d h,
by rw [← zero_mk d]; simp [h, -zero_mk]
protected theorem add_comm : a + b = b + a :=
num_denom_cases_on' a $ λ n₁ d₁ h₁,
num_denom_cases_on' b $ λ n₂ d₂ h₂,
by simp [h₁, h₂, mul_comm]
protected theorem add_assoc : a + b + c = a + (b + c) :=
num_denom_cases_on' a $ λ n₁ d₁ h₁,
num_denom_cases_on' b $ λ n₂ d₂ h₂,
num_denom_cases_on' c $ λ n₃ d₃ h₃,
by simp [h₁, h₂, h₃, mul_ne_zero, mul_add, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, add_left_comm]
protected theorem add_left_neg : -a + a = 0 :=
num_denom_cases_on' a $ λ n d h,
by simp [h]
protected theorem mul_one : a * 1 = a :=
num_denom_cases_on' a $ λ n d h,
by change (1:ℚ) with 1 /. 1; simp [h]
protected theorem one_mul : 1 * a = a :=
num_denom_cases_on' a $ λ n d h,
by change (1:ℚ) with 1 /. 1; simp [h]
protected theorem mul_comm : a * b = b * a :=
num_denom_cases_on' a $ λ n₁ d₁ h₁,
num_denom_cases_on' b $ λ n₂ d₂ h₂,
by simp [h₁, h₂, mul_comm]
protected theorem mul_assoc : a * b * c = a * (b * c) :=
num_denom_cases_on' a $ λ n₁ d₁ h₁,
num_denom_cases_on' b $ λ n₂ d₂ h₂,
num_denom_cases_on' c $ λ n₃ d₃ h₃,
by simp [h₁, h₂, h₃, mul_ne_zero, mul_comm, mul_left_comm]
protected theorem add_mul : (a + b) * c = a * c + b * c :=
num_denom_cases_on' a $ λ n₁ d₁ h₁,
num_denom_cases_on' b $ λ n₂ d₂ h₂,
num_denom_cases_on' c $ λ n₃ d₃ h₃,
by simp [h₁, h₂, h₃, mul_ne_zero];
refine (div_mk_div_cancel_left (int.coe_nat_ne_zero.2 h₃)).symm.trans _;
simp [mul_add, mul_comm, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]
protected theorem mul_add : a * (b + c) = a * b + a * c :=
by rw [rat.mul_comm, rat.add_mul, rat.mul_comm, rat.mul_comm c a]
protected theorem zero_ne_one : 0 ≠ (1:ℚ) :=
mt (λ (h : 0 = 1 /. 1), (mk_eq_zero one_ne_zero).1 h.symm) one_ne_zero
protected theorem mul_inv_cancel : a ≠ 0 → a * a⁻¹ = 1 :=
num_denom_cases_on' a $ λ n d h a0,
have n0 : n ≠ 0, from mt (by intro e; subst e; simp) a0,
by simp [h, n0, mul_comm]; exact
eq.trans (by simp) (@div_mk_div_cancel_left 1 1 _ n0)
protected theorem inv_mul_cancel (h : a ≠ 0) : a⁻¹ * a = 1 :=
eq.trans (rat.mul_comm _ _) (rat.mul_inv_cancel _ h)
instance : decidable_eq ℚ := by tactic.mk_dec_eq_instance
instance : discrete_field ℚ :=
{ zero := 0,
add := rat.add,
neg := rat.neg,
one := 1,
mul := rat.mul,
inv := rat.inv,
zero_add := rat.zero_add,
add_zero := rat.add_zero,
add_comm := rat.add_comm,
add_assoc := rat.add_assoc,
add_left_neg := rat.add_left_neg,
mul_one := rat.mul_one,
one_mul := rat.one_mul,
mul_comm := rat.mul_comm,
mul_assoc := rat.mul_assoc,
left_distrib := rat.mul_add,
right_distrib := rat.add_mul,
zero_ne_one := rat.zero_ne_one,
mul_inv_cancel := rat.mul_inv_cancel,
inv_mul_cancel := rat.inv_mul_cancel,
has_decidable_eq := rat.decidable_eq,
inv_zero := rfl }
/- Extra instances to short-circuit type class resolution -/
instance : field ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : division_ring ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : integral_domain ℚ := by apply_instance
-- TODO(Mario): this instance slows down data.real.basic
--instance : domain ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : nonzero_comm_ring ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : comm_ring ℚ := by apply_instance
--instance : ring ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : comm_semiring ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : semiring ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : add_comm_group ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : add_group ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : add_comm_monoid ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : add_monoid ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : add_left_cancel_semigroup ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : add_right_cancel_semigroup ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : add_comm_semigroup ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : add_semigroup ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : comm_monoid ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : monoid ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : comm_semigroup ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : semigroup ℚ := by apply_instance
theorem sub_def {a b c d : ℤ} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (d0 : d ≠ 0) :
a /. b - c /. d = (a * d - c * b) /. (b * d) :=
by simp [b0, d0]
@[simp] lemma denom_neg_eq_denom : ∀ q : ℚ, (-q).denom = q.denom
| ⟨_, d, _, _⟩ := rfl
@[simp] lemma num_neg_eq_neg_num : ∀ q : ℚ, (-q).num = -(q.num)
| ⟨n, _, _, _⟩ := rfl
@[simp] lemma num_zero : rat.num 0 = 0 := rfl
lemma zero_of_num_zero {q : ℚ} (hq : q.num = 0) : q = 0 :=
have q = q.num /. q.denom, from num_denom.symm,
by simpa [hq]
lemma zero_iff_num_zero {q : ℚ} : q = 0 ↔ q.num = 0 :=
⟨λ _, by simp *, zero_of_num_zero⟩
lemma num_ne_zero_of_ne_zero {q : ℚ} (h : q ≠ 0) : q.num ≠ 0 :=
assume : q.num = 0,
h $ zero_of_num_zero this
@[simp] lemma num_one : (1 : ℚ).num = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma denom_one : (1 : ℚ).denom = 1 := rfl
lemma denom_ne_zero (q : ℚ) : q.denom ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt q.pos
lemma eq_iff_mul_eq_mul {p q : ℚ} : p = q ↔ p.num * q.denom = q.num * p.denom :=
begin
conv_lhs { rw [←(@num_denom p), ←(@num_denom q)] },
exact rat.mk_eq (by exact_mod_cast p.denom_ne_zero) (by exact_mod_cast q.denom_ne_zero)
end
lemma mk_num_ne_zero_of_ne_zero {q : ℚ} {n d : ℤ} (hq : q ≠ 0) (hqnd : q = n /. d) : n ≠ 0 :=
assume : n = 0,
hq $ by simpa [this] using hqnd
lemma mk_denom_ne_zero_of_ne_zero {q : ℚ} {n d : ℤ} (hq : q ≠ 0) (hqnd : q = n /. d) : d ≠ 0 :=
assume : d = 0,
hq $ by simpa [this] using hqnd
lemma mk_ne_zero_of_ne_zero {n d : ℤ} (h : n ≠ 0) (hd : d ≠ 0) : n /. d ≠ 0 :=
assume : n /. d = 0,
h $ (mk_eq_zero hd).1 this
lemma mul_num_denom (q r : ℚ) : q * r = (q.num * r.num) /. ↑(q.denom * r.denom) :=
have hq' : (↑q.denom : ℤ) ≠ 0, by have := denom_ne_zero q; simpa,
have hr' : (↑r.denom : ℤ) ≠ 0, by have := denom_ne_zero r; simpa,
suffices (q.num /. ↑q.denom) * (r.num /. ↑r.denom) = (q.num * r.num) /. ↑(q.denom * r.denom),
by simpa using this,
by simp [mul_def hq' hr', -num_denom]
lemma div_num_denom (q r : ℚ) : q / r = (q.num * r.denom) /. (q.denom * r.num) :=
if hr : r.num = 0 then
have hr' : r = 0, from zero_of_num_zero hr,
by simp *
else calc q / r = q * r⁻¹ : div_eq_mul_inv
... = (q.num /. q.denom) * (r.num /. r.denom)⁻¹ : by simp
... = (q.num /. q.denom) * (r.denom /. r.num) : by rw inv_def
... = (q.num * r.denom) /. (q.denom * r.num) : mul_def (by simpa using denom_ne_zero q) hr
lemma num_denom_mk {q : ℚ} {n d : ℤ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hd : d ≠ 0) (qdf : q = n /. d) :
∃ c : ℤ, n = c * q.num ∧ d = c * q.denom :=
have hq : q ≠ 0, from
assume : q = 0,
hn $ (rat.mk_eq_zero hd).1 (by cc),
have q.num /. q.denom = n /. d, by rwa [num_denom],
have q.num * d = n * ↑(q.denom), from (rat.mk_eq (by simp [rat.denom_ne_zero]) hd).1 this,
begin
existsi n / q.num,
have hqdn : q.num ∣ n, begin rw qdf, apply rat.num_dvd, assumption end,
split,
{ rw int.div_mul_cancel hqdn },
{ apply int.eq_mul_div_of_mul_eq_mul_of_dvd_left,
{apply rat.num_ne_zero_of_ne_zero hq},
{simp [rat.denom_ne_zero]},
repeat {assumption} }
end
theorem mk_pnat_num (n : ℤ) (d : ℕ+) :
(mk_pnat n d).num = n / nat.gcd n.nat_abs d :=
by cases d; refl
theorem mk_pnat_denom (n : ℤ) (d : ℕ+) :
(mk_pnat n d).denom = d / nat.gcd n.nat_abs d :=
by cases d; refl
theorem mul_num (q₁ q₂ : ℚ) : (q₁ * q₂).num =
(q₁.num * q₂.num) / nat.gcd (q₁.num * q₂.num).nat_abs (q₁.denom * q₂.denom) :=
by cases q₁; cases q₂; refl
theorem mul_denom (q₁ q₂ : ℚ) : (q₁ * q₂).denom =
(q₁.denom * q₂.denom) / nat.gcd (q₁.num * q₂.num).nat_abs (q₁.denom * q₂.denom) :=
by cases q₁; cases q₂; refl
theorem mul_self_num (q : ℚ) : (q * q).num = q.num * q.num :=
by rw [mul_num, int.nat_abs_mul, nat.coprime.gcd_eq_one, int.coe_nat_one, int.div_one];
exact (q.cop.mul_right q.cop).mul (q.cop.mul_right q.cop)
theorem mul_self_denom (q : ℚ) : (q * q).denom = q.denom * q.denom :=
by rw [rat.mul_denom, int.nat_abs_mul, nat.coprime.gcd_eq_one, nat.div_one];
exact (q.cop.mul_right q.cop).mul (q.cop.mul_right q.cop)
lemma add_num_denom (q r : ℚ) : q + r =
((q.num * r.denom + q.denom * r.num : ℤ)) /. (↑q.denom * ↑r.denom : ℤ) :=
have hqd : (q.denom : ℤ) ≠ 0, from int.coe_nat_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 q.3,
have hrd : (r.denom : ℤ) ≠ 0, from int.coe_nat_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 r.3,
by conv_lhs { rw [←@num_denom q, ←@num_denom r, rat.add_def hqd hrd] };
simp [mul_comm]
section casts
theorem coe_int_eq_mk : ∀ (z : ℤ), ↑z = z /. 1
| (n : ℕ) := show (n:ℚ) = n /. 1,
by induction n with n IH n; simp [*, show (1:ℚ) = 1 /. 1, from rfl]
| -[1+ n] := show (-(n + 1) : ℚ) = -[1+ n] /. 1, begin
induction n with n IH, {refl},
show -(n + 1 + 1 : ℚ) = -[1+ n.succ] /. 1,
rw [neg_add, IH],
simpa [show -1 = (-1) /. 1, from rfl]
end
theorem mk_eq_div (n d : ℤ) : n /. d = ((n : ℚ) / d) :=
begin
by_cases d0 : d = 0, {simp [d0, div_zero]},
simp [division_def, coe_int_eq_mk, mul_def one_ne_zero d0]
end
theorem coe_int_eq_of_int (z : ℤ) : ↑z = of_int z :=
(coe_int_eq_mk z).trans (of_int_eq_mk z).symm
@[simp, elim_cast] theorem coe_int_num (n : ℤ) : (n : ℚ).num = n :=
by rw coe_int_eq_of_int; refl
@[simp, elim_cast] theorem coe_int_denom (n : ℤ) : (n : ℚ).denom = 1 :=
by rw coe_int_eq_of_int; refl
lemma coe_int_num_of_denom_eq_one {q : ℚ} (hq : q.denom = 1) : ↑(q.num) = q :=
by { conv_rhs { rw [←(@num_denom q), hq] }, rw [coe_int_eq_mk], refl }
instance : can_lift ℚ ℤ :=
⟨coe, λ q, q.denom = 1, λ q hq, ⟨q.num, coe_int_num_of_denom_eq_one hq⟩⟩
theorem coe_nat_eq_mk (n : ℕ) : ↑n = n /. 1 :=
by rw [← int.cast_coe_nat, coe_int_eq_mk]
@[simp, elim_cast] theorem coe_nat_num (n : ℕ) : (n : ℚ).num = n :=
by rw [← int.cast_coe_nat, coe_int_num]
@[simp, elim_cast] theorem coe_nat_denom (n : ℕ) : (n : ℚ).denom = 1 :=
by rw [← int.cast_coe_nat, coe_int_denom]
end casts
lemma inv_def' {q : ℚ} : q⁻¹ = (q.denom : ℚ) / q.num :=
by { conv_lhs { rw ←(@num_denom q) }, cases q, simp [div_num_denom] }
@[simp] lemma mul_own_denom_eq_num {q : ℚ} : q * q.denom = q.num :=
begin
suffices : mk (q.num) ↑(q.denom) * mk ↑(q.denom) 1 = mk (q.num) 1, by
{ conv { for q [1] { rw ←(@num_denom q) }}, rwa [coe_int_eq_mk, coe_nat_eq_mk] },
have : (q.denom : ℤ) ≠ 0, from ne_of_gt (by exact_mod_cast q.pos),
rw [(rat.mul_def this one_ne_zero), (mul_comm (q.denom : ℤ) 1), (div_mk_div_cancel_left this)]
end
end rat
|
3924d9dd87bf45ff6da58372a08c2c0a9fd82ee0 | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/algebra/continued_fractions/terminated_stable.lean | 86e0c340ce6f0d0762356cb36c34e8c3d875c565 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,829 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kevin Kappelmann. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Kappelmann
-/
import algebra.continued_fractions.translations
/-!
# Stabilisation of gcf Computations Under Termination
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
## Summary
We show that the continuants and convergents of a gcf stabilise once the gcf terminates.
-/
namespace generalized_continued_fraction
open stream.seq as seq
variables {K : Type*} {g : generalized_continued_fraction K} {n m : ℕ}
/-- If a gcf terminated at position `n`, it also terminated at `m ≥ n`.-/
lemma terminated_stable (n_le_m : n ≤ m) (terminated_at_n : g.terminated_at n) :
g.terminated_at m :=
g.s.terminated_stable n_le_m terminated_at_n
variable [division_ring K]
lemma continuants_aux_stable_step_of_terminated (terminated_at_n : g.terminated_at n) :
g.continuants_aux (n + 2) = g.continuants_aux (n + 1) :=
by { rw [terminated_at_iff_s_none] at terminated_at_n,
simp only [terminated_at_n, continuants_aux] }
lemma continuants_aux_stable_of_terminated (n_lt_m : n < m)
(terminated_at_n : g.terminated_at n) :
g.continuants_aux m = g.continuants_aux (n + 1) :=
begin
refine nat.le_induction rfl (λ k hnk hk, _) _ n_lt_m,
rcases nat.exists_eq_add_of_lt hnk with ⟨k, rfl⟩,
refine (continuants_aux_stable_step_of_terminated _).trans hk,
exact terminated_stable (nat.le_add_right _ _) terminated_at_n
end
lemma convergents'_aux_stable_step_of_terminated {s : seq $ pair K}
(terminated_at_n : s.terminated_at n) :
convergents'_aux s (n + 1) = convergents'_aux s n :=
begin
change s.nth n = none at terminated_at_n,
induction n with n IH generalizing s,
case nat.zero
{ simp only [convergents'_aux, terminated_at_n, seq.head] },
case nat.succ
{ cases s_head_eq : s.head with gp_head,
case option.none { simp only [convergents'_aux, s_head_eq] },
case option.some
{ have : s.tail.terminated_at n, by simp only [seq.terminated_at, s.nth_tail, terminated_at_n],
simp only [convergents'_aux, s_head_eq, (IH this)] } }
end
lemma convergents'_aux_stable_of_terminated
{s : seq $ pair K} (n_le_m : n ≤ m)
(terminated_at_n : s.terminated_at n) :
convergents'_aux s m = convergents'_aux s n :=
begin
induction n_le_m with m n_le_m IH,
{ refl },
{ refine (convergents'_aux_stable_step_of_terminated _).trans IH,
exact s.terminated_stable n_le_m terminated_at_n }
end
lemma continuants_stable_of_terminated (n_le_m : n ≤ m) (terminated_at_n : g.terminated_at n) :
g.continuants m = g.continuants n :=
by simp only [nth_cont_eq_succ_nth_cont_aux,
(continuants_aux_stable_of_terminated (nat.pred_le_iff.elim_left n_le_m) terminated_at_n)]
lemma numerators_stable_of_terminated (n_le_m : n ≤ m) (terminated_at_n : g.terminated_at n) :
g.numerators m = g.numerators n :=
by simp only [num_eq_conts_a, (continuants_stable_of_terminated n_le_m terminated_at_n)]
lemma denominators_stable_of_terminated (n_le_m : n ≤ m) (terminated_at_n : g.terminated_at n) :
g.denominators m = g.denominators n :=
by simp only [denom_eq_conts_b, (continuants_stable_of_terminated n_le_m terminated_at_n)]
lemma convergents_stable_of_terminated (n_le_m : n ≤ m) (terminated_at_n : g.terminated_at n) :
g.convergents m = g.convergents n :=
by simp only [convergents, (denominators_stable_of_terminated n_le_m terminated_at_n),
(numerators_stable_of_terminated n_le_m terminated_at_n)]
lemma convergents'_stable_of_terminated (n_le_m : n ≤ m) (terminated_at_n : g.terminated_at n) :
g.convergents' m = g.convergents' n :=
by simp only [convergents', (convergents'_aux_stable_of_terminated n_le_m terminated_at_n)]
end generalized_continued_fraction
|
3d8f217c5a46a77504d4ef121f7ddd550b8cb580 | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/measure_theory/function/l1_space.lean | eb5066f28b7734655b963007901b23bfa7d15c15 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 50,441 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou
-/
import measure_theory.function.lp_space
/-!
# Integrable functions and `L¹` space
In the first part of this file, the predicate `integrable` is defined and basic properties of
integrable functions are proved.
Such a predicate is already available under the name `mem_ℒp 1`. We give a direct definition which
is easier to use, and show that it is equivalent to `mem_ℒp 1`
In the second part, we establish an API between `integrable` and the space `L¹` of equivalence
classes of integrable functions, already defined as a special case of `L^p` spaces for `p = 1`.
## Notation
* `α →₁[μ] β` is the type of `L¹` space, where `α` is a `measure_space` and `β` is a `normed_group`
with a `second_countable_topology`. `f : α →ₘ β` is a "function" in `L¹`. In comments, `[f]` is
also used to denote an `L¹` function.
`₁` can be typed as `\1`.
## Main definitions
* Let `f : α → β` be a function, where `α` is a `measure_space` and `β` a `normed_group`.
Then `has_finite_integral f` means `(∫⁻ a, ∥f a∥₊) < ∞`.
* If `β` is moreover a `measurable_space` then `f` is called `integrable` if
`f` is `measurable` and `has_finite_integral f` holds.
## Implementation notes
To prove something for an arbitrary integrable function, a useful theorem is
`integrable.induction` in the file `set_integral`.
## Tags
integrable, function space, l1
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical topological_space big_operators ennreal measure_theory nnreal
open set filter topological_space ennreal emetric measure_theory
variables {α β γ δ : Type*} {m : measurable_space α} {μ ν : measure α} [measurable_space δ]
variables [normed_group β]
variables [normed_group γ]
namespace measure_theory
/-! ### Some results about the Lebesgue integral involving a normed group -/
lemma lintegral_nnnorm_eq_lintegral_edist (f : α → β) :
∫⁻ a, ∥f a∥₊ ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, edist (f a) 0 ∂μ :=
by simp only [edist_eq_coe_nnnorm]
lemma lintegral_norm_eq_lintegral_edist (f : α → β) :
∫⁻ a, (ennreal.of_real ∥f a∥) ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, edist (f a) 0 ∂μ :=
by simp only [of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm, edist_eq_coe_nnnorm]
lemma lintegral_edist_triangle {f g h : α → β}
(hf : ae_strongly_measurable f μ) (hg : ae_strongly_measurable g μ)
(hh : ae_strongly_measurable h μ) :
∫⁻ a, edist (f a) (g a) ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, edist (f a) (h a) ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, edist (g a) (h a) ∂μ :=
begin
rw ← lintegral_add' (hf.edist hh) (hg.edist hh),
refine lintegral_mono (λ a, _),
apply edist_triangle_right
end
lemma lintegral_nnnorm_zero : ∫⁻ a : α, ∥(0 : β)∥₊ ∂μ = 0 := by simp
lemma lintegral_nnnorm_add
{f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (hf : ae_strongly_measurable f μ) (hg : ae_strongly_measurable g μ) :
∫⁻ a, ∥f a∥₊ + ∥g a∥₊ ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ∥f a∥₊ ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, ∥g a∥₊ ∂μ :=
lintegral_add' hf.ennnorm hg.ennnorm
lemma lintegral_nnnorm_neg {f : α → β} :
∫⁻ a, ∥(-f) a∥₊ ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ∥f a∥₊ ∂μ :=
by simp only [pi.neg_apply, nnnorm_neg]
/-! ### The predicate `has_finite_integral` -/
/-- `has_finite_integral f μ` means that the integral `∫⁻ a, ∥f a∥ ∂μ` is finite.
`has_finite_integral f` means `has_finite_integral f volume`. -/
def has_finite_integral {m : measurable_space α} (f : α → β) (μ : measure α . volume_tac) : Prop :=
∫⁻ a, ∥f a∥₊ ∂μ < ∞
lemma has_finite_integral_iff_norm (f : α → β) :
has_finite_integral f μ ↔ ∫⁻ a, (ennreal.of_real ∥f a∥) ∂μ < ∞ :=
by simp only [has_finite_integral, of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
lemma has_finite_integral_iff_edist (f : α → β) :
has_finite_integral f μ ↔ ∫⁻ a, edist (f a) 0 ∂μ < ∞ :=
by simp only [has_finite_integral_iff_norm, edist_dist, dist_zero_right]
lemma has_finite_integral_iff_of_real {f : α → ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) :
has_finite_integral f μ ↔ ∫⁻ a, ennreal.of_real (f a) ∂μ < ∞ :=
have lintegral_eq : ∫⁻ a, (ennreal.of_real ∥f a∥) ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ennreal.of_real (f a) ∂μ :=
begin
refine lintegral_congr_ae (h.mono $ λ a h, _),
rwa [real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg]
end,
by rw [has_finite_integral_iff_norm, lintegral_eq]
lemma has_finite_integral_iff_of_nnreal {f : α → ℝ≥0} :
has_finite_integral (λ x, (f x : ℝ)) μ ↔ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ < ∞ :=
by simp [has_finite_integral_iff_norm]
lemma has_finite_integral.mono {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (hg : has_finite_integral g μ)
(h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∥f a∥ ≤ ∥g a∥) : has_finite_integral f μ :=
begin
simp only [has_finite_integral_iff_norm] at *,
calc ∫⁻ a, (ennreal.of_real ∥f a∥) ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ (a : α), (ennreal.of_real ∥g a∥) ∂μ :
lintegral_mono_ae (h.mono $ assume a h, of_real_le_of_real h)
... < ∞ : hg
end
lemma has_finite_integral.mono' {f : α → β} {g : α → ℝ} (hg : has_finite_integral g μ)
(h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∥f a∥ ≤ g a) : has_finite_integral f μ :=
hg.mono $ h.mono $ λ x hx, le_trans hx (le_abs_self _)
lemma has_finite_integral.congr' {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (hf : has_finite_integral f μ)
(h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∥f a∥ = ∥g a∥) :
has_finite_integral g μ :=
hf.mono $ eventually_eq.le $ eventually_eq.symm h
lemma has_finite_integral_congr' {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∥f a∥ = ∥g a∥) :
has_finite_integral f μ ↔ has_finite_integral g μ :=
⟨λ hf, hf.congr' h, λ hg, hg.congr' $ eventually_eq.symm h⟩
lemma has_finite_integral.congr {f g : α → β} (hf : has_finite_integral f μ) (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
has_finite_integral g μ :=
hf.congr' $ h.fun_comp norm
lemma has_finite_integral_congr {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
has_finite_integral f μ ↔ has_finite_integral g μ :=
has_finite_integral_congr' $ h.fun_comp norm
lemma has_finite_integral_const_iff {c : β} :
has_finite_integral (λ x : α, c) μ ↔ c = 0 ∨ μ univ < ∞ :=
by simp [has_finite_integral, lintegral_const, lt_top_iff_ne_top, or_iff_not_imp_left]
lemma has_finite_integral_const [is_finite_measure μ] (c : β) :
has_finite_integral (λ x : α, c) μ :=
has_finite_integral_const_iff.2 (or.inr $ measure_lt_top _ _)
lemma has_finite_integral_of_bounded [is_finite_measure μ] {f : α → β} {C : ℝ}
(hC : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∥f a∥ ≤ C) : has_finite_integral f μ :=
(has_finite_integral_const C).mono' hC
lemma has_finite_integral.mono_measure {f : α → β} (h : has_finite_integral f ν) (hμ : μ ≤ ν) :
has_finite_integral f μ :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (lintegral_mono' hμ le_rfl) h
lemma has_finite_integral.add_measure {f : α → β} (hμ : has_finite_integral f μ)
(hν : has_finite_integral f ν) : has_finite_integral f (μ + ν) :=
begin
simp only [has_finite_integral, lintegral_add_measure] at *,
exact add_lt_top.2 ⟨hμ, hν⟩
end
lemma has_finite_integral.left_of_add_measure {f : α → β} (h : has_finite_integral f (μ + ν)) :
has_finite_integral f μ :=
h.mono_measure $ measure.le_add_right $ le_rfl
lemma has_finite_integral.right_of_add_measure {f : α → β} (h : has_finite_integral f (μ + ν)) :
has_finite_integral f ν :=
h.mono_measure $ measure.le_add_left $ le_rfl
@[simp] lemma has_finite_integral_add_measure {f : α → β} :
has_finite_integral f (μ + ν) ↔ has_finite_integral f μ ∧ has_finite_integral f ν :=
⟨λ h, ⟨h.left_of_add_measure, h.right_of_add_measure⟩, λ h, h.1.add_measure h.2⟩
lemma has_finite_integral.smul_measure {f : α → β} (h : has_finite_integral f μ) {c : ℝ≥0∞}
(hc : c ≠ ∞) : has_finite_integral f (c • μ) :=
begin
simp only [has_finite_integral, lintegral_smul_measure] at *,
exact mul_lt_top hc h.ne
end
@[simp] lemma has_finite_integral_zero_measure {m : measurable_space α} (f : α → β) :
has_finite_integral f (0 : measure α) :=
by simp only [has_finite_integral, lintegral_zero_measure, with_top.zero_lt_top]
variables (α β μ)
@[simp] lemma has_finite_integral_zero : has_finite_integral (λa:α, (0:β)) μ :=
by simp [has_finite_integral]
variables {α β μ}
lemma has_finite_integral.neg {f : α → β} (hfi : has_finite_integral f μ) :
has_finite_integral (-f) μ :=
by simpa [has_finite_integral] using hfi
@[simp] lemma has_finite_integral_neg_iff {f : α → β} :
has_finite_integral (-f) μ ↔ has_finite_integral f μ :=
⟨λ h, neg_neg f ▸ h.neg, has_finite_integral.neg⟩
lemma has_finite_integral.norm {f : α → β} (hfi : has_finite_integral f μ) :
has_finite_integral (λa, ∥f a∥) μ :=
have eq : (λa, (nnnorm ∥f a∥ : ℝ≥0∞)) = λa, (∥f a∥₊ : ℝ≥0∞),
by { funext, rw nnnorm_norm },
by { rwa [has_finite_integral, eq] }
lemma has_finite_integral_norm_iff (f : α → β) :
has_finite_integral (λa, ∥f a∥) μ ↔ has_finite_integral f μ :=
has_finite_integral_congr' $ eventually_of_forall $ λ x, norm_norm (f x)
lemma has_finite_integral_to_real_of_lintegral_ne_top
{f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) :
has_finite_integral (λ x, (f x).to_real) μ :=
begin
have : ∀ x, (∥(f x).to_real∥₊ : ℝ≥0∞) =
@coe ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0∞ _ (⟨(f x).to_real, ennreal.to_real_nonneg⟩ : ℝ≥0),
{ intro x, rw real.nnnorm_of_nonneg },
simp_rw [has_finite_integral, this],
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (lintegral_mono (λ x, _)) (lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 hf),
by_cases hfx : f x = ∞,
{ simp [hfx] },
{ lift f x to ℝ≥0 using hfx with fx,
simp [← h] }
end
lemma is_finite_measure_with_density_of_real {f : α → ℝ} (hfi : has_finite_integral f μ) :
is_finite_measure (μ.with_density (λ x, ennreal.of_real $ f x)) :=
begin
refine is_finite_measure_with_density ((lintegral_mono $ λ x, _).trans_lt hfi).ne,
exact real.of_real_le_ennnorm (f x)
end
section dominated_convergence
variables {F : ℕ → α → β} {f : α → β} {bound : α → ℝ}
lemma all_ae_of_real_F_le_bound (h : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∥F n a∥ ≤ bound a) :
∀ n, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ennreal.of_real ∥F n a∥ ≤ ennreal.of_real (bound a) :=
λn, (h n).mono $ λ a h, ennreal.of_real_le_of_real h
lemma all_ae_tendsto_of_real_norm (h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, tendsto (λ n, F n a) at_top $ 𝓝 $ f a) :
∀ᵐ a ∂μ, tendsto (λn, ennreal.of_real ∥F n a∥) at_top $ 𝓝 $ ennreal.of_real ∥f a∥ :=
h.mono $
λ a h, tendsto_of_real $ tendsto.comp (continuous.tendsto continuous_norm _) h
lemma all_ae_of_real_f_le_bound (h_bound : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∥F n a∥ ≤ bound a)
(h_lim : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, tendsto (λ n, F n a) at_top (𝓝 (f a))) :
∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ennreal.of_real ∥f a∥ ≤ ennreal.of_real (bound a) :=
begin
have F_le_bound := all_ae_of_real_F_le_bound h_bound,
rw ← ae_all_iff at F_le_bound,
apply F_le_bound.mp ((all_ae_tendsto_of_real_norm h_lim).mono _),
assume a tendsto_norm F_le_bound,
exact le_of_tendsto' tendsto_norm (F_le_bound)
end
lemma has_finite_integral_of_dominated_convergence {F : ℕ → α → β} {f : α → β} {bound : α → ℝ}
(bound_has_finite_integral : has_finite_integral bound μ)
(h_bound : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∥F n a∥ ≤ bound a)
(h_lim : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, tendsto (λ n, F n a) at_top (𝓝 (f a))) :
has_finite_integral f μ :=
/- `∥F n a∥ ≤ bound a` and `∥F n a∥ --> ∥f a∥` implies `∥f a∥ ≤ bound a`,
and so `∫ ∥f∥ ≤ ∫ bound < ∞` since `bound` is has_finite_integral -/
begin
rw has_finite_integral_iff_norm,
calc ∫⁻ a, (ennreal.of_real ∥f a∥) ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, ennreal.of_real (bound a) ∂μ :
lintegral_mono_ae $ all_ae_of_real_f_le_bound h_bound h_lim
... < ∞ :
begin
rw ← has_finite_integral_iff_of_real,
{ exact bound_has_finite_integral },
exact (h_bound 0).mono (λ a h, le_trans (norm_nonneg _) h)
end
end
lemma tendsto_lintegral_norm_of_dominated_convergence
{F : ℕ → α → β} {f : α → β} {bound : α → ℝ}
(F_measurable : ∀ n, ae_strongly_measurable (F n) μ)
(bound_has_finite_integral : has_finite_integral bound μ)
(h_bound : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∥F n a∥ ≤ bound a)
(h_lim : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, tendsto (λ n, F n a) at_top (𝓝 (f a))) :
tendsto (λn, ∫⁻ a, (ennreal.of_real ∥F n a - f a∥) ∂μ) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
have f_measurable : ae_strongly_measurable f μ :=
ae_strongly_measurable_of_tendsto_ae _ F_measurable h_lim,
let b := λ a, 2 * ennreal.of_real (bound a) in
/- `∥F n a∥ ≤ bound a` and `F n a --> f a` implies `∥f a∥ ≤ bound a`, and thus by the
triangle inequality, have `∥F n a - f a∥ ≤ 2 * (bound a). -/
have hb : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ennreal.of_real ∥F n a - f a∥ ≤ b a,
begin
assume n,
filter_upwards [all_ae_of_real_F_le_bound h_bound n, all_ae_of_real_f_le_bound h_bound h_lim]
with a h₁ h₂,
calc ennreal.of_real ∥F n a - f a∥ ≤ (ennreal.of_real ∥F n a∥) + (ennreal.of_real ∥f a∥) :
begin
rw [← ennreal.of_real_add],
apply of_real_le_of_real,
{ apply norm_sub_le }, { exact norm_nonneg _ }, { exact norm_nonneg _ }
end
... ≤ (ennreal.of_real (bound a)) + (ennreal.of_real (bound a)) : add_le_add h₁ h₂
... = b a : by rw ← two_mul
end,
/- On the other hand, `F n a --> f a` implies that `∥F n a - f a∥ --> 0` -/
have h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, tendsto (λ n, ennreal.of_real ∥F n a - f a∥) at_top (𝓝 0),
begin
rw ← ennreal.of_real_zero,
refine h_lim.mono (λ a h, (continuous_of_real.tendsto _).comp _),
rwa ← tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero
end,
/- Therefore, by the dominated convergence theorem for nonnegative integration, have
` ∫ ∥f a - F n a∥ --> 0 ` -/
begin
suffices h : tendsto (λn, ∫⁻ a, (ennreal.of_real ∥F n a - f a∥) ∂μ) at_top (𝓝 (∫⁻ (a:α), 0 ∂μ)),
{ rwa lintegral_zero at h },
-- Using the dominated convergence theorem.
refine tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence' _ _ hb _ _,
-- Show `λa, ∥f a - F n a∥` is almost everywhere measurable for all `n`
{ exact λ n, measurable_of_real.comp_ae_measurable
((F_measurable n).sub f_measurable).norm.ae_measurable },
-- Show `2 * bound` is has_finite_integral
{ rw has_finite_integral_iff_of_real at bound_has_finite_integral,
{ calc ∫⁻ a, b a ∂μ = 2 * ∫⁻ a, ennreal.of_real (bound a) ∂μ :
by { rw lintegral_const_mul', exact coe_ne_top }
... ≠ ∞ : mul_ne_top coe_ne_top bound_has_finite_integral.ne },
filter_upwards [h_bound 0] with _ h using le_trans (norm_nonneg _) h },
-- Show `∥f a - F n a∥ --> 0`
{ exact h }
end
end dominated_convergence
section pos_part
/-! Lemmas used for defining the positive part of a `L¹` function -/
lemma has_finite_integral.max_zero {f : α → ℝ} (hf : has_finite_integral f μ) :
has_finite_integral (λa, max (f a) 0) μ :=
hf.mono $ eventually_of_forall $ λ x, by simp [real.norm_eq_abs, abs_le, abs_nonneg, le_abs_self]
lemma has_finite_integral.min_zero {f : α → ℝ} (hf : has_finite_integral f μ) :
has_finite_integral (λa, min (f a) 0) μ :=
hf.mono $ eventually_of_forall $ λ x,
by simp [real.norm_eq_abs, abs_le, abs_nonneg, neg_le, neg_le_abs_self, abs_eq_max_neg, le_total]
end pos_part
section normed_space
variables {𝕜 : Type*} [normed_field 𝕜] [normed_space 𝕜 β]
lemma has_finite_integral.smul (c : 𝕜) {f : α → β} : has_finite_integral f μ →
has_finite_integral (c • f) μ :=
begin
simp only [has_finite_integral], assume hfi,
calc
∫⁻ (a : α), ∥c • f a∥₊ ∂μ = ∫⁻ (a : α), (∥c∥₊) * ∥f a∥₊ ∂μ :
by simp only [nnnorm_smul, ennreal.coe_mul]
... < ∞ :
begin
rw lintegral_const_mul',
exacts [mul_lt_top coe_ne_top hfi.ne, coe_ne_top]
end
end
lemma has_finite_integral_smul_iff {c : 𝕜} (hc : c ≠ 0) (f : α → β) :
has_finite_integral (c • f) μ ↔ has_finite_integral f μ :=
begin
split,
{ assume h,
simpa only [smul_smul, inv_mul_cancel hc, one_smul] using h.smul c⁻¹ },
exact has_finite_integral.smul _
end
lemma has_finite_integral.const_mul {f : α → ℝ} (h : has_finite_integral f μ) (c : ℝ) :
has_finite_integral (λ x, c * f x) μ :=
(has_finite_integral.smul c h : _)
lemma has_finite_integral.mul_const {f : α → ℝ} (h : has_finite_integral f μ) (c : ℝ) :
has_finite_integral (λ x, f x * c) μ :=
by simp_rw [mul_comm, h.const_mul _]
end normed_space
/-! ### The predicate `integrable` -/
-- variables [measurable_space β] [measurable_space γ] [measurable_space δ]
/-- `integrable f μ` means that `f` is measurable and that the integral `∫⁻ a, ∥f a∥ ∂μ` is finite.
`integrable f` means `integrable f volume`. -/
def integrable {α} {m : measurable_space α} (f : α → β) (μ : measure α . volume_tac) : Prop :=
ae_strongly_measurable f μ ∧ has_finite_integral f μ
lemma mem_ℒp_one_iff_integrable {f : α → β} : mem_ℒp f 1 μ ↔ integrable f μ :=
by simp_rw [integrable, has_finite_integral, mem_ℒp, snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm]
lemma integrable.ae_strongly_measurable {f : α → β} (hf : integrable f μ) :
ae_strongly_measurable f μ :=
hf.1
lemma integrable.ae_measurable [measurable_space β] [borel_space β]
{f : α → β} (hf : integrable f μ) :
ae_measurable f μ :=
hf.ae_strongly_measurable.ae_measurable
lemma integrable.has_finite_integral {f : α → β} (hf : integrable f μ) : has_finite_integral f μ :=
hf.2
lemma integrable.mono {f : α → β} {g : α → γ}
(hg : integrable g μ) (hf : ae_strongly_measurable f μ) (h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∥f a∥ ≤ ∥g a∥) :
integrable f μ :=
⟨hf, hg.has_finite_integral.mono h⟩
lemma integrable.mono' {f : α → β} {g : α → ℝ}
(hg : integrable g μ) (hf : ae_strongly_measurable f μ) (h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∥f a∥ ≤ g a) :
integrable f μ :=
⟨hf, hg.has_finite_integral.mono' h⟩
lemma integrable.congr' {f : α → β} {g : α → γ}
(hf : integrable f μ) (hg : ae_strongly_measurable g μ) (h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∥f a∥ = ∥g a∥) :
integrable g μ :=
⟨hg, hf.has_finite_integral.congr' h⟩
lemma integrable_congr' {f : α → β} {g : α → γ}
(hf : ae_strongly_measurable f μ) (hg : ae_strongly_measurable g μ) (h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∥f a∥ = ∥g a∥) :
integrable f μ ↔ integrable g μ :=
⟨λ h2f, h2f.congr' hg h, λ h2g, h2g.congr' hf $ eventually_eq.symm h⟩
lemma integrable.congr {f g : α → β} (hf : integrable f μ) (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
integrable g μ :=
⟨hf.1.congr h, hf.2.congr h⟩
lemma integrable_congr {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
integrable f μ ↔ integrable g μ :=
⟨λ hf, hf.congr h, λ hg, hg.congr h.symm⟩
lemma integrable_const_iff {c : β} : integrable (λ x : α, c) μ ↔ c = 0 ∨ μ univ < ∞ :=
begin
have : ae_strongly_measurable (λ (x : α), c) μ := ae_strongly_measurable_const,
rw [integrable, and_iff_right this, has_finite_integral_const_iff]
end
lemma integrable_const [is_finite_measure μ] (c : β) : integrable (λ x : α, c) μ :=
integrable_const_iff.2 $ or.inr $ measure_lt_top _ _
lemma mem_ℒp.integrable_norm_rpow {f : α → β} {p : ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : mem_ℒp f p μ) (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
integrable (λ (x : α), ∥f x∥ ^ p.to_real) μ :=
begin
rw ← mem_ℒp_one_iff_integrable,
exact hf.norm_rpow hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top,
end
lemma mem_ℒp.integrable_norm_rpow' [is_finite_measure μ] {f : α → β} {p : ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : mem_ℒp f p μ) :
integrable (λ (x : α), ∥f x∥ ^ p.to_real) μ :=
begin
by_cases h_zero : p = 0,
{ simp [h_zero, integrable_const] },
by_cases h_top : p = ∞,
{ simp [h_top, integrable_const] },
exact hf.integrable_norm_rpow h_zero h_top
end
lemma integrable.mono_measure {f : α → β} (h : integrable f ν) (hμ : μ ≤ ν) : integrable f μ :=
⟨h.ae_strongly_measurable.mono_measure hμ, h.has_finite_integral.mono_measure hμ⟩
lemma integrable.of_measure_le_smul {μ' : measure α} (c : ℝ≥0∞) (hc : c ≠ ∞)
(hμ'_le : μ' ≤ c • μ) {f : α → β} (hf : integrable f μ) :
integrable f μ' :=
by { rw ← mem_ℒp_one_iff_integrable at hf ⊢, exact hf.of_measure_le_smul c hc hμ'_le, }
lemma integrable.add_measure {f : α → β} (hμ : integrable f μ) (hν : integrable f ν) :
integrable f (μ + ν) :=
begin
simp_rw ← mem_ℒp_one_iff_integrable at hμ hν ⊢,
refine ⟨hμ.ae_strongly_measurable.add_measure hν.ae_strongly_measurable, _⟩,
rw [snorm_one_add_measure, ennreal.add_lt_top],
exact ⟨hμ.snorm_lt_top, hν.snorm_lt_top⟩,
end
lemma integrable.left_of_add_measure {f : α → β} (h : integrable f (μ + ν)) : integrable f μ :=
by { rw ← mem_ℒp_one_iff_integrable at h ⊢, exact h.left_of_add_measure, }
lemma integrable.right_of_add_measure {f : α → β} (h : integrable f (μ + ν)) : integrable f ν :=
by { rw ← mem_ℒp_one_iff_integrable at h ⊢, exact h.right_of_add_measure, }
@[simp] lemma integrable_add_measure {f : α → β} :
integrable f (μ + ν) ↔ integrable f μ ∧ integrable f ν :=
⟨λ h, ⟨h.left_of_add_measure, h.right_of_add_measure⟩, λ h, h.1.add_measure h.2⟩
@[simp] lemma integrable_zero_measure {m : measurable_space α} {f : α → β} :
integrable f (0 : measure α) :=
⟨ae_measurable_zero_measure f, has_finite_integral_zero_measure f⟩
theorem integrable_finset_sum_measure {ι} {m : measurable_space α} {f : α → β}
{μ : ι → measure α} {s : finset ι} :
integrable f (∑ i in s, μ i) ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, integrable f (μ i) :=
by induction s using finset.induction_on; simp [*]
lemma integrable.smul_measure {f : α → β} (h : integrable f μ) {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ ∞) :
integrable f (c • μ) :=
by { rw ← mem_ℒp_one_iff_integrable at h ⊢, exact h.smul_measure hc, }
lemma integrable_smul_measure {f : α → β} {c : ℝ≥0∞} (h₁ : c ≠ 0) (h₂ : c ≠ ∞) :
integrable f (c • μ) ↔ integrable f μ :=
⟨λ h, by simpa only [smul_smul, ennreal.inv_mul_cancel h₁ h₂, one_smul]
using h.smul_measure (ennreal.inv_ne_top.2 h₁), λ h, h.smul_measure h₂⟩
lemma integrable.to_average {f : α → β} (h : integrable f μ) :
integrable f ((μ univ)⁻¹ • μ) :=
begin
rcases eq_or_ne μ 0 with rfl|hne,
{ rwa smul_zero },
{ apply h.smul_measure, simpa }
end
lemma integrable_average [is_finite_measure μ] {f : α → β} :
integrable f ((μ univ)⁻¹ • μ) ↔ integrable f μ :=
(eq_or_ne μ 0).by_cases (λ h, by simp [h]) $ λ h,
integrable_smul_measure (ennreal.inv_ne_zero.2 $ measure_ne_top _ _)
(ennreal.inv_ne_top.2 $ mt measure.measure_univ_eq_zero.1 h)
lemma integrable_map_measure {f : α → δ} {g : δ → β}
(hg : ae_strongly_measurable g (measure.map f μ)) (hf : ae_measurable f μ) :
integrable g (measure.map f μ) ↔ integrable (g ∘ f) μ :=
by { simp_rw ← mem_ℒp_one_iff_integrable, exact mem_ℒp_map_measure_iff hg hf, }
lemma integrable.comp_ae_measurable {f : α → δ} {g : δ → β}
(hg : integrable g (measure.map f μ)) (hf : ae_measurable f μ) : integrable (g ∘ f) μ :=
(integrable_map_measure hg.ae_strongly_measurable hf).mp hg
lemma integrable.comp_measurable {f : α → δ} {g : δ → β}
(hg : integrable g (measure.map f μ)) (hf : measurable f) : integrable (g ∘ f) μ :=
hg.comp_ae_measurable hf.ae_measurable
lemma _root_.measurable_embedding.integrable_map_iff
{f : α → δ} (hf : measurable_embedding f) {g : δ → β} :
integrable g (measure.map f μ) ↔ integrable (g ∘ f) μ :=
by { simp_rw ← mem_ℒp_one_iff_integrable, exact hf.mem_ℒp_map_measure_iff, }
lemma integrable_map_equiv (f : α ≃ᵐ δ) (g : δ → β) :
integrable g (measure.map f μ) ↔ integrable (g ∘ f) μ :=
by { simp_rw ← mem_ℒp_one_iff_integrable, exact f.mem_ℒp_map_measure_iff, }
lemma measure_preserving.integrable_comp {ν : measure δ} {g : δ → β}
{f : α → δ} (hf : measure_preserving f μ ν) (hg : ae_strongly_measurable g ν) :
integrable (g ∘ f) μ ↔ integrable g ν :=
by { rw ← hf.map_eq at hg ⊢, exact (integrable_map_measure hg hf.measurable.ae_measurable).symm }
lemma measure_preserving.integrable_comp_emb {f : α → δ} {ν} (h₁ : measure_preserving f μ ν)
(h₂ : measurable_embedding f) {g : δ → β} :
integrable (g ∘ f) μ ↔ integrable g ν :=
h₁.map_eq ▸ iff.symm h₂.integrable_map_iff
lemma lintegral_edist_lt_top {f g : α → β}
(hf : integrable f μ) (hg : integrable g μ) :
∫⁻ a, edist (f a) (g a) ∂μ < ∞ :=
lt_of_le_of_lt
(lintegral_edist_triangle hf.ae_strongly_measurable hg.ae_strongly_measurable
(ae_strongly_measurable_const : ae_strongly_measurable (λa, (0 : β)) μ))
(ennreal.add_lt_top.2 $ by { simp_rw ← has_finite_integral_iff_edist,
exact ⟨hf.has_finite_integral, hg.has_finite_integral⟩ })
variables (α β μ)
@[simp] lemma integrable_zero : integrable (λ _, (0 : β)) μ :=
by simp [integrable, ae_strongly_measurable_const]
variables {α β μ}
lemma integrable.add' {f g : α → β} (hf : integrable f μ)
(hg : integrable g μ) :
has_finite_integral (f + g) μ :=
calc ∫⁻ a, ∥f a + g a∥₊ ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, ∥f a∥₊ + ∥g a∥₊ ∂μ :
lintegral_mono (λ a, by exact_mod_cast nnnorm_add_le _ _)
... = _ : lintegral_nnnorm_add hf.ae_strongly_measurable hg.ae_strongly_measurable
... < ∞ : add_lt_top.2 ⟨hf.has_finite_integral, hg.has_finite_integral⟩
lemma integrable.add
{f g : α → β} (hf : integrable f μ) (hg : integrable g μ) : integrable (f + g) μ :=
⟨hf.ae_strongly_measurable.add hg.ae_strongly_measurable, hf.add' hg⟩
lemma integrable_finset_sum' {ι} (s : finset ι)
{f : ι → α → β} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, integrable (f i) μ) : integrable (∑ i in s, f i) μ :=
finset.sum_induction f (λ g, integrable g μ) (λ _ _, integrable.add)
(integrable_zero _ _ _) hf
lemma integrable_finset_sum {ι} (s : finset ι)
{f : ι → α → β} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, integrable (f i) μ) : integrable (λ a, ∑ i in s, f i a) μ :=
by simpa only [← finset.sum_apply] using integrable_finset_sum' s hf
lemma integrable.neg {f : α → β} (hf : integrable f μ) : integrable (-f) μ :=
⟨hf.ae_strongly_measurable.neg, hf.has_finite_integral.neg⟩
@[simp] lemma integrable_neg_iff {f : α → β} :
integrable (-f) μ ↔ integrable f μ :=
⟨λ h, neg_neg f ▸ h.neg, integrable.neg⟩
lemma integrable.sub' {f g : α → β}
(hf : integrable f μ) (hg : integrable g μ) : has_finite_integral (f - g) μ :=
calc ∫⁻ a, ∥f a - g a∥₊ ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, ∥f a∥₊ + ∥-g a∥₊ ∂μ :
lintegral_mono (assume a, by { simp only [sub_eq_add_neg], exact_mod_cast nnnorm_add_le _ _ } )
... = _ :
by { simp only [nnnorm_neg],
exact lintegral_nnnorm_add hf.ae_strongly_measurable hg.ae_strongly_measurable }
... < ∞ : add_lt_top.2 ⟨hf.has_finite_integral, hg.has_finite_integral⟩
lemma integrable.sub {f g : α → β}
(hf : integrable f μ) (hg : integrable g μ) : integrable (f - g) μ :=
by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add hg.neg
lemma integrable.norm {f : α → β} (hf : integrable f μ) :
integrable (λa, ∥f a∥) μ :=
⟨hf.ae_strongly_measurable.norm, hf.has_finite_integral.norm⟩
lemma integrable.abs {f : α → ℝ} (hf : integrable f μ) :
integrable (λa, |f a|) μ :=
by simpa [← real.norm_eq_abs] using hf.norm
lemma integrable_norm_iff {f : α → β} (hf : ae_strongly_measurable f μ) :
integrable (λa, ∥f a∥) μ ↔ integrable f μ :=
by simp_rw [integrable, and_iff_right hf, and_iff_right hf.norm, has_finite_integral_norm_iff]
lemma integrable_of_norm_sub_le {f₀ f₁ : α → β} {g : α → ℝ}
(hf₁_m : ae_strongly_measurable f₁ μ)
(hf₀_i : integrable f₀ μ)
(hg_i : integrable g μ)
(h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∥f₀ a - f₁ a∥ ≤ g a) :
integrable f₁ μ :=
begin
have : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∥f₁ a∥ ≤ ∥f₀ a∥ + g a,
{ apply h.mono,
intros a ha,
calc ∥f₁ a∥ ≤ ∥f₀ a∥ + ∥f₀ a - f₁ a∥ : norm_le_insert _ _
... ≤ ∥f₀ a∥ + g a : add_le_add_left ha _ },
exact integrable.mono' (hf₀_i.norm.add hg_i) hf₁_m this
end
lemma integrable.prod_mk {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (hf : integrable f μ) (hg : integrable g μ) :
integrable (λ x, (f x, g x)) μ :=
⟨hf.ae_strongly_measurable.prod_mk hg.ae_strongly_measurable,
(hf.norm.add' hg.norm).mono $ eventually_of_forall $ λ x,
calc max ∥f x∥ ∥g x∥ ≤ ∥f x∥ + ∥g x∥ : max_le_add_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)
... ≤ ∥(∥f x∥ + ∥g x∥)∥ : le_abs_self _⟩
lemma mem_ℒp.integrable {q : ℝ≥0∞} (hq1 : 1 ≤ q) {f : α → β} [is_finite_measure μ]
(hfq : mem_ℒp f q μ) : integrable f μ :=
mem_ℒp_one_iff_integrable.mp (hfq.mem_ℒp_of_exponent_le hq1)
lemma lipschitz_with.integrable_comp_iff_of_antilipschitz {K K'} {f : α → β} {g : β → γ}
(hg : lipschitz_with K g) (hg' : antilipschitz_with K' g) (g0 : g 0 = 0) :
integrable (g ∘ f) μ ↔ integrable f μ :=
by simp [← mem_ℒp_one_iff_integrable, hg.mem_ℒp_comp_iff_of_antilipschitz hg' g0]
lemma integrable.real_to_nnreal {f : α → ℝ} (hf : integrable f μ) :
integrable (λ x, ((f x).to_nnreal : ℝ)) μ :=
begin
refine ⟨hf.ae_strongly_measurable.ae_measurable
.real_to_nnreal.coe_nnreal_real.ae_strongly_measurable, _⟩,
rw has_finite_integral_iff_norm,
refine lt_of_le_of_lt _ ((has_finite_integral_iff_norm _).1 hf.has_finite_integral),
apply lintegral_mono,
assume x,
simp [real.norm_eq_abs, ennreal.of_real_le_of_real, abs_le, abs_nonneg, le_abs_self],
end
lemma of_real_to_real_ae_eq {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x < ∞) :
(λ x, ennreal.of_real (f x).to_real) =ᵐ[μ] f :=
begin
filter_upwards [hf],
assume x hx,
simp only [hx.ne, of_real_to_real, ne.def, not_false_iff],
end
lemma coe_to_nnreal_ae_eq {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x < ∞) :
(λ x, ((f x).to_nnreal : ℝ≥0∞)) =ᵐ[μ] f :=
begin
filter_upwards [hf],
assume x hx,
simp only [hx.ne, ne.def, not_false_iff, coe_to_nnreal],
end
section
variables {E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space ℝ E]
lemma integrable_with_density_iff_integrable_coe_smul
{f : α → ℝ≥0} (hf : measurable f) {g : α → E} :
integrable g (μ.with_density (λ x, f x)) ↔ integrable (λ x, (f x : ℝ) • g x) μ :=
begin
by_cases H : ae_strongly_measurable (λ (x : α), (f x : ℝ) • g x) μ,
{ simp only [integrable, ae_strongly_measurable_with_density_iff hf, has_finite_integral, H,
true_and],
rw lintegral_with_density_eq_lintegral_mul₀' hf.coe_nnreal_ennreal.ae_measurable,
{ congr',
ext1 x,
simp only [nnnorm_smul, nnreal.nnnorm_eq, coe_mul, pi.mul_apply] },
{ rw ae_measurable_with_density_ennreal_iff hf,
convert H.ennnorm,
ext1 x,
simp only [nnnorm_smul, nnreal.nnnorm_eq, coe_mul] } },
{ simp only [integrable, ae_strongly_measurable_with_density_iff hf, H, false_and] }
end
lemma integrable_with_density_iff_integrable_smul {f : α → ℝ≥0} (hf : measurable f) {g : α → E} :
integrable g (μ.with_density (λ x, f x)) ↔ integrable (λ x, f x • g x) μ :=
integrable_with_density_iff_integrable_coe_smul hf
lemma integrable_with_density_iff_integrable_smul'
{f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : measurable f) (hflt : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x < ∞) {g : α → E} :
integrable g (μ.with_density f) ↔ integrable (λ x, (f x).to_real • g x) μ :=
begin
rw [← with_density_congr_ae (coe_to_nnreal_ae_eq hflt),
integrable_with_density_iff_integrable_smul],
{ refl },
{ exact hf.ennreal_to_nnreal },
end
lemma integrable_with_density_iff_integrable_coe_smul₀
{f : α → ℝ≥0} (hf : ae_measurable f μ) {g : α → E} :
integrable g (μ.with_density (λ x, f x)) ↔ integrable (λ x, (f x : ℝ) • g x) μ :=
calc
integrable g (μ.with_density (λ x, f x))
↔ integrable g (μ.with_density (λ x, hf.mk f x)) :
begin
suffices : (λ x, (f x : ℝ≥0∞)) =ᵐ[μ] (λ x, hf.mk f x), by rw with_density_congr_ae this,
filter_upwards [hf.ae_eq_mk] with x hx,
simp [hx],
end
... ↔ integrable (λ x, (hf.mk f x : ℝ) • g x) μ :
integrable_with_density_iff_integrable_coe_smul hf.measurable_mk
... ↔ integrable (λ x, (f x : ℝ) • g x) μ :
begin
apply integrable_congr,
filter_upwards [hf.ae_eq_mk] with x hx,
simp [hx],
end
lemma integrable_with_density_iff_integrable_smul₀
{f : α → ℝ≥0} (hf : ae_measurable f μ) {g : α → E} :
integrable g (μ.with_density (λ x, f x)) ↔ integrable (λ x, f x • g x) μ :=
integrable_with_density_iff_integrable_coe_smul₀ hf
end
lemma integrable_with_density_iff {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : measurable f)
(hflt : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x < ∞) {g : α → ℝ} :
integrable g (μ.with_density f) ↔ integrable (λ x, g x * (f x).to_real) μ :=
begin
have : (λ x, g x * (f x).to_real) = (λ x, (f x).to_real • g x), by simp [mul_comm],
rw this,
exact integrable_with_density_iff_integrable_smul' hf hflt,
end
section
variables {E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space ℝ E]
lemma mem_ℒ1_smul_of_L1_with_density {f : α → ℝ≥0} (f_meas : measurable f)
(u : Lp E 1 (μ.with_density (λ x, f x))) :
mem_ℒp (λ x, f x • u x) 1 μ :=
mem_ℒp_one_iff_integrable.2 $ (integrable_with_density_iff_integrable_smul f_meas).1 $
mem_ℒp_one_iff_integrable.1 (Lp.mem_ℒp u)
variable (μ)
/-- The map `u ↦ f • u` is an isometry between the `L^1` spaces for `μ.with_density f` and `μ`. -/
noncomputable def with_density_smul_li {f : α → ℝ≥0} (f_meas : measurable f) :
Lp E 1 (μ.with_density (λ x, f x)) →ₗᵢ[ℝ] Lp E 1 μ :=
{ to_fun := λ u, (mem_ℒ1_smul_of_L1_with_density f_meas u).to_Lp _,
map_add' :=
begin
assume u v,
ext1,
filter_upwards [(mem_ℒ1_smul_of_L1_with_density f_meas u).coe_fn_to_Lp,
(mem_ℒ1_smul_of_L1_with_density f_meas v).coe_fn_to_Lp,
(mem_ℒ1_smul_of_L1_with_density f_meas (u + v)).coe_fn_to_Lp,
Lp.coe_fn_add ((mem_ℒ1_smul_of_L1_with_density f_meas u).to_Lp _)
((mem_ℒ1_smul_of_L1_with_density f_meas v).to_Lp _),
(ae_with_density_iff f_meas.coe_nnreal_ennreal).1 (Lp.coe_fn_add u v)],
assume x hu hv huv h' h'',
rw [huv, h', pi.add_apply, hu, hv],
rcases eq_or_ne (f x) 0 with hx|hx,
{ simp only [hx, zero_smul, add_zero] },
{ rw [h'' _, pi.add_apply, smul_add],
simpa only [ne.def, ennreal.coe_eq_zero] using hx }
end,
map_smul' :=
begin
assume r u,
ext1,
filter_upwards [(ae_with_density_iff f_meas.coe_nnreal_ennreal).1 (Lp.coe_fn_smul r u),
(mem_ℒ1_smul_of_L1_with_density f_meas (r • u)).coe_fn_to_Lp,
Lp.coe_fn_smul r ((mem_ℒ1_smul_of_L1_with_density f_meas u).to_Lp _),
(mem_ℒ1_smul_of_L1_with_density f_meas u).coe_fn_to_Lp],
assume x h h' h'' h''',
rw [ring_hom.id_apply, h', h'', pi.smul_apply, h'''],
rcases eq_or_ne (f x) 0 with hx|hx,
{ simp only [hx, zero_smul, smul_zero] },
{ rw [h _, smul_comm, pi.smul_apply],
simpa only [ne.def, ennreal.coe_eq_zero] using hx }
end,
norm_map' :=
begin
assume u,
simp only [snorm, linear_map.coe_mk, Lp.norm_to_Lp, one_ne_zero, ennreal.one_ne_top,
ennreal.one_to_real, if_false, snorm', ennreal.rpow_one, _root_.div_one, Lp.norm_def],
rw lintegral_with_density_eq_lintegral_mul_non_measurable _ f_meas.coe_nnreal_ennreal
(filter.eventually_of_forall (λ x, ennreal.coe_lt_top)),
congr' 1,
apply lintegral_congr_ae,
filter_upwards [(mem_ℒ1_smul_of_L1_with_density f_meas u).coe_fn_to_Lp] with x hx,
rw [hx, pi.mul_apply],
change ↑∥(f x : ℝ) • u x∥₊ = ↑(f x) * ↑∥u x∥₊,
simp only [nnnorm_smul, nnreal.nnnorm_eq, ennreal.coe_mul],
end }
@[simp] lemma with_density_smul_li_apply {f : α → ℝ≥0} (f_meas : measurable f)
(u : Lp E 1 (μ.with_density (λ x, f x))) :
with_density_smul_li μ f_meas u =
(mem_ℒ1_smul_of_L1_with_density f_meas u).to_Lp (λ x, f x • u x) :=
rfl
end
lemma mem_ℒ1_to_real_of_lintegral_ne_top
{f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hfm : ae_measurable f μ) (hfi : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) :
mem_ℒp (λ x, (f x).to_real) 1 μ :=
begin
rw [mem_ℒp, snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm],
exact ⟨(ae_measurable.ennreal_to_real hfm).ae_strongly_measurable,
has_finite_integral_to_real_of_lintegral_ne_top hfi⟩
end
lemma integrable_to_real_of_lintegral_ne_top
{f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hfm : ae_measurable f μ) (hfi : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) :
integrable (λ x, (f x).to_real) μ :=
mem_ℒp_one_iff_integrable.1 $ mem_ℒ1_to_real_of_lintegral_ne_top hfm hfi
section pos_part
/-! ### Lemmas used for defining the positive part of a `L¹` function -/
lemma integrable.pos_part {f : α → ℝ} (hf : integrable f μ) : integrable (λ a, max (f a) 0) μ :=
⟨(hf.ae_strongly_measurable.ae_measurable.max ae_measurable_const).ae_strongly_measurable,
hf.has_finite_integral.max_zero⟩
lemma integrable.neg_part {f : α → ℝ} (hf : integrable f μ) : integrable (λ a, max (-f a) 0) μ :=
hf.neg.pos_part
end pos_part
section normed_space
variables {𝕜 : Type*} [normed_field 𝕜] [normed_space 𝕜 β]
lemma integrable.smul (c : 𝕜) {f : α → β}
(hf : integrable f μ) : integrable (c • f) μ :=
⟨hf.ae_strongly_measurable.const_smul c, hf.has_finite_integral.smul c⟩
lemma integrable_smul_iff {c : 𝕜} (hc : c ≠ 0) (f : α → β) :
integrable (c • f) μ ↔ integrable f μ :=
and_congr (ae_strongly_measurable_const_smul_iff₀ hc) (has_finite_integral_smul_iff hc f)
lemma integrable.const_mul {f : α → ℝ} (h : integrable f μ) (c : ℝ) :
integrable (λ x, c * f x) μ :=
integrable.smul c h
lemma integrable.const_mul' {f : α → ℝ} (h : integrable f μ) (c : ℝ) :
integrable ((λ (x : α), c) * f) μ :=
integrable.smul c h
lemma integrable.mul_const {f : α → ℝ} (h : integrable f μ) (c : ℝ) :
integrable (λ x, f x * c) μ :=
by simp_rw [mul_comm, h.const_mul _]
lemma integrable.mul_const' {f : α → ℝ} (h : integrable f μ) (c : ℝ) :
integrable (f * (λ (x : α), c)) μ :=
integrable.mul_const h c
lemma integrable.div_const {f : α → ℝ} (h : integrable f μ) (c : ℝ) :
integrable (λ x, f x / c) μ :=
by simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, h.mul_const]
end normed_space
section normed_space_over_complete_field
variables {𝕜 : Type*} [nondiscrete_normed_field 𝕜] [complete_space 𝕜]
variables {E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E]
lemma integrable_smul_const {f : α → 𝕜} {c : E} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
integrable (λ x, f x • c) μ ↔ integrable f μ :=
begin
simp_rw [integrable, ae_strongly_measurable_smul_const_iff hc, and.congr_right_iff,
has_finite_integral, nnnorm_smul, ennreal.coe_mul],
intro hf, rw [lintegral_mul_const' _ _ ennreal.coe_ne_top, ennreal.mul_lt_top_iff],
have : ∀ x : ℝ≥0∞, x = 0 → x < ∞ := by simp,
simp [hc, or_iff_left_of_imp (this _)]
end
end normed_space_over_complete_field
section is_R_or_C
variables {𝕜 : Type*} [is_R_or_C 𝕜] {f : α → 𝕜}
lemma integrable.of_real {f : α → ℝ} (hf : integrable f μ) :
integrable (λ x, (f x : 𝕜)) μ :=
by { rw ← mem_ℒp_one_iff_integrable at hf ⊢, exact hf.of_real }
lemma integrable.re_im_iff :
integrable (λ x, is_R_or_C.re (f x)) μ ∧ integrable (λ x, is_R_or_C.im (f x)) μ ↔
integrable f μ :=
by { simp_rw ← mem_ℒp_one_iff_integrable, exact mem_ℒp_re_im_iff }
lemma integrable.re (hf : integrable f μ) : integrable (λ x, is_R_or_C.re (f x)) μ :=
by { rw ← mem_ℒp_one_iff_integrable at hf ⊢, exact hf.re, }
lemma integrable.im (hf : integrable f μ) : integrable (λ x, is_R_or_C.im (f x)) μ :=
by { rw ← mem_ℒp_one_iff_integrable at hf ⊢, exact hf.im, }
end is_R_or_C
section inner_product
variables {𝕜 E : Type*} [is_R_or_C 𝕜] [inner_product_space 𝕜 E] {f : α → E}
local notation `⟪`x`, `y`⟫` := @inner 𝕜 E _ x y
lemma integrable.const_inner (c : E) (hf : integrable f μ) : integrable (λ x, ⟪c, f x⟫) μ :=
by { rw ← mem_ℒp_one_iff_integrable at hf ⊢, exact hf.const_inner c, }
lemma integrable.inner_const (hf : integrable f μ) (c : E) : integrable (λ x, ⟪f x, c⟫) μ :=
by { rw ← mem_ℒp_one_iff_integrable at hf ⊢, exact hf.inner_const c, }
end inner_product
section trim
variables {H : Type*} [normed_group H] {m0 : measurable_space α} {μ' : measure α} {f : α → H}
lemma integrable.trim (hm : m ≤ m0) (hf_int : integrable f μ') (hf : strongly_measurable[m] f) :
integrable f (μ'.trim hm) :=
begin
refine ⟨hf.ae_strongly_measurable, _⟩,
rw [has_finite_integral, lintegral_trim hm _],
{ exact hf_int.2, },
{ exact @strongly_measurable.ennnorm _ m _ _ f hf },
end
lemma integrable_of_integrable_trim (hm : m ≤ m0) (hf_int : integrable f (μ'.trim hm)) :
integrable f μ' :=
begin
obtain ⟨hf_meas_ae, hf⟩ := hf_int,
refine ⟨ae_strongly_measurable_of_ae_strongly_measurable_trim hm hf_meas_ae, _⟩,
rw has_finite_integral at hf ⊢,
rwa lintegral_trim_ae hm _ at hf,
exact ae_strongly_measurable.ennnorm hf_meas_ae
end
end trim
section sigma_finite
variables {E : Type*} {m0 : measurable_space α} [normed_group E]
lemma integrable_of_forall_fin_meas_le' {μ : measure α} (hm : m ≤ m0) [sigma_finite (μ.trim hm)]
(C : ℝ≥0∞) (hC : C < ∞) {f : α → E} (hf_meas : ae_strongly_measurable f μ)
(hf : ∀ s, measurable_set[m] s → μ s ≠ ∞ → ∫⁻ x in s, ∥f x∥₊ ∂μ ≤ C) :
integrable f μ :=
⟨hf_meas, (lintegral_le_of_forall_fin_meas_le' hm C hf_meas.ennnorm hf).trans_lt hC⟩
lemma integrable_of_forall_fin_meas_le [sigma_finite μ]
(C : ℝ≥0∞) (hC : C < ∞) {f : α → E} (hf_meas : ae_strongly_measurable f μ)
(hf : ∀ s : set α, measurable_set s → μ s ≠ ∞ → ∫⁻ x in s, ∥f x∥₊ ∂μ ≤ C) :
integrable f μ :=
@integrable_of_forall_fin_meas_le' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (by rwa trim_eq_self) C hC _ hf_meas hf
end sigma_finite
/-! ### The predicate `integrable` on measurable functions modulo a.e.-equality -/
namespace ae_eq_fun
section
/-- A class of almost everywhere equal functions is `integrable` if its function representative
is integrable. -/
def integrable (f : α →ₘ[μ] β) : Prop := integrable f μ
lemma integrable_mk {f : α → β} (hf : ae_strongly_measurable f μ ) :
(integrable (mk f hf : α →ₘ[μ] β)) ↔ measure_theory.integrable f μ :=
begin
simp [integrable],
apply integrable_congr,
exact coe_fn_mk f hf
end
lemma integrable_coe_fn {f : α →ₘ[μ] β} : (measure_theory.integrable f μ) ↔ integrable f :=
by rw [← integrable_mk, mk_coe_fn]
lemma integrable_zero : integrable (0 : α →ₘ[μ] β) :=
(integrable_zero α β μ).congr (coe_fn_mk _ _).symm
end
section
lemma integrable.neg {f : α →ₘ[μ] β} : integrable f → integrable (-f) :=
induction_on f $ λ f hfm hfi, (integrable_mk _).2 ((integrable_mk hfm).1 hfi).neg
section
lemma integrable_iff_mem_L1 {f : α →ₘ[μ] β} : integrable f ↔ f ∈ (α →₁[μ] β) :=
by rw [← integrable_coe_fn, ← mem_ℒp_one_iff_integrable, Lp.mem_Lp_iff_mem_ℒp]
lemma integrable.add {f g : α →ₘ[μ] β} : integrable f → integrable g → integrable (f + g) :=
begin
refine induction_on₂ f g (λ f hf g hg hfi hgi, _),
simp only [integrable_mk, mk_add_mk] at hfi hgi ⊢,
exact hfi.add hgi
end
lemma integrable.sub {f g : α →ₘ[μ] β} (hf : integrable f) (hg : integrable g) :
integrable (f - g) :=
(sub_eq_add_neg f g).symm ▸ hf.add hg.neg
end
section normed_space
variables {𝕜 : Type*} [normed_field 𝕜] [normed_space 𝕜 β]
lemma integrable.smul {c : 𝕜} {f : α →ₘ[μ] β} : integrable f → integrable (c • f) :=
induction_on f $ λ f hfm hfi, (integrable_mk _).2 $ ((integrable_mk hfm).1 hfi).smul _
end normed_space
end
end ae_eq_fun
namespace L1
lemma integrable_coe_fn (f : α →₁[μ] β) :
integrable f μ :=
by { rw ← mem_ℒp_one_iff_integrable, exact Lp.mem_ℒp f }
lemma has_finite_integral_coe_fn (f : α →₁[μ] β) :
has_finite_integral f μ :=
(integrable_coe_fn f).has_finite_integral
lemma strongly_measurable_coe_fn (f : α →₁[μ] β) : strongly_measurable f :=
Lp.strongly_measurable f
lemma measurable_coe_fn [measurable_space β] [borel_space β] (f : α →₁[μ] β) :
measurable f :=
(Lp.strongly_measurable f).measurable
lemma ae_strongly_measurable_coe_fn (f : α →₁[μ] β) : ae_strongly_measurable f μ :=
Lp.ae_strongly_measurable f
lemma ae_measurable_coe_fn [measurable_space β] [borel_space β] (f : α →₁[μ] β) :
ae_measurable f μ :=
(Lp.strongly_measurable f).measurable.ae_measurable
lemma edist_def (f g : α →₁[μ] β) :
edist f g = ∫⁻ a, edist (f a) (g a) ∂μ :=
by { simp [Lp.edist_def, snorm, snorm'], simp [edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_sub] }
lemma dist_def (f g : α →₁[μ] β) :
dist f g = (∫⁻ a, edist (f a) (g a) ∂μ).to_real :=
by { simp [Lp.dist_def, snorm, snorm'], simp [edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_sub] }
lemma norm_def (f : α →₁[μ] β) :
∥f∥ = (∫⁻ a, ∥f a∥₊ ∂μ).to_real :=
by { simp [Lp.norm_def, snorm, snorm'] }
/-- Computing the norm of a difference between two L¹-functions. Note that this is not a
special case of `norm_def` since `(f - g) x` and `f x - g x` are not equal
(but only a.e.-equal). -/
lemma norm_sub_eq_lintegral (f g : α →₁[μ] β) :
∥f - g∥ = (∫⁻ x, (∥f x - g x∥₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ∂μ).to_real :=
begin
rw [norm_def],
congr' 1,
rw lintegral_congr_ae,
filter_upwards [Lp.coe_fn_sub f g] with _ ha,
simp only [ha, pi.sub_apply],
end
lemma of_real_norm_eq_lintegral (f : α →₁[μ] β) :
ennreal.of_real ∥f∥ = ∫⁻ x, (∥f x∥₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ∂μ :=
by { rw [norm_def, ennreal.of_real_to_real], exact ne_of_lt (has_finite_integral_coe_fn f) }
/-- Computing the norm of a difference between two L¹-functions. Note that this is not a
special case of `of_real_norm_eq_lintegral` since `(f - g) x` and `f x - g x` are not equal
(but only a.e.-equal). -/
lemma of_real_norm_sub_eq_lintegral (f g : α →₁[μ] β) :
ennreal.of_real ∥f - g∥ = ∫⁻ x, (∥f x - g x∥₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ∂μ :=
begin
simp_rw [of_real_norm_eq_lintegral, ← edist_eq_coe_nnnorm],
apply lintegral_congr_ae,
filter_upwards [Lp.coe_fn_sub f g] with _ ha,
simp only [ha, pi.sub_apply],
end
end L1
namespace integrable
/-- Construct the equivalence class `[f]` of an integrable function `f`, as a member of the
space `L1 β 1 μ`. -/
def to_L1 (f : α → β) (hf : integrable f μ) : α →₁[μ] β :=
(mem_ℒp_one_iff_integrable.2 hf).to_Lp f
@[simp] lemma to_L1_coe_fn (f : α →₁[μ] β) (hf : integrable f μ) : hf.to_L1 f = f :=
by simp [integrable.to_L1]
lemma coe_fn_to_L1 {f : α → β} (hf : integrable f μ) : hf.to_L1 f =ᵐ[μ] f :=
ae_eq_fun.coe_fn_mk _ _
@[simp] lemma to_L1_zero (h : integrable (0 : α → β) μ) : h.to_L1 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_L1_eq_mk (f : α → β) (hf : integrable f μ) :
(hf.to_L1 f : α →ₘ[μ] β) = ae_eq_fun.mk f hf.ae_strongly_measurable :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma to_L1_eq_to_L1_iff (f g : α → β) (hf : integrable f μ) (hg : integrable g μ) :
to_L1 f hf = to_L1 g hg ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] g :=
mem_ℒp.to_Lp_eq_to_Lp_iff _ _
lemma to_L1_add (f g : α → β) (hf : integrable f μ) (hg : integrable g μ) :
to_L1 (f + g) (hf.add hg) = to_L1 f hf + to_L1 g hg := rfl
lemma to_L1_neg (f : α → β) (hf : integrable f μ) :
to_L1 (- f) (integrable.neg hf) = - to_L1 f hf := rfl
lemma to_L1_sub (f g : α → β) (hf : integrable f μ) (hg : integrable g μ) :
to_L1 (f - g) (hf.sub hg) = to_L1 f hf - to_L1 g hg := rfl
lemma norm_to_L1 (f : α → β) (hf : integrable f μ) :
∥hf.to_L1 f∥ = ennreal.to_real (∫⁻ a, edist (f a) 0 ∂μ) :=
by { simp [to_L1, snorm, snorm'], simp [edist_eq_coe_nnnorm] }
lemma norm_to_L1_eq_lintegral_norm (f : α → β) (hf : integrable f μ) :
∥hf.to_L1 f∥ = ennreal.to_real (∫⁻ a, (ennreal.of_real ∥f a∥) ∂μ) :=
by { rw [norm_to_L1, lintegral_norm_eq_lintegral_edist] }
@[simp] lemma edist_to_L1_to_L1 (f g : α → β) (hf : integrable f μ) (hg : integrable g μ) :
edist (hf.to_L1 f) (hg.to_L1 g) = ∫⁻ a, edist (f a) (g a) ∂μ :=
by { simp [integrable.to_L1, snorm, snorm'], simp [edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_sub] }
@[simp] lemma edist_to_L1_zero (f : α → β) (hf : integrable f μ) :
edist (hf.to_L1 f) 0 = ∫⁻ a, edist (f a) 0 ∂μ :=
by { simp [integrable.to_L1, snorm, snorm'], simp [edist_eq_coe_nnnorm] }
variables {𝕜 : Type*} [normed_field 𝕜] [normed_space 𝕜 β]
lemma to_L1_smul (f : α → β) (hf : integrable f μ) (k : 𝕜) :
to_L1 (λ a, k • f a) (hf.smul k) = k • to_L1 f hf := rfl
lemma to_L1_smul' (f : α → β) (hf : integrable f μ) (k : 𝕜) :
to_L1 (k • f) (hf.smul k) = k • to_L1 f hf := rfl
end integrable
end measure_theory
open measure_theory
variables {E : Type*} [normed_group E]
{𝕜 : Type*} [nondiscrete_normed_field 𝕜] [normed_space 𝕜 E]
{H : Type*} [normed_group H] [normed_space 𝕜 H]
lemma measure_theory.integrable.apply_continuous_linear_map {φ : α → H →L[𝕜] E}
(φ_int : integrable φ μ) (v : H) : integrable (λ a, φ a v) μ :=
(φ_int.norm.mul_const ∥v∥).mono' (φ_int.ae_strongly_measurable.apply_continuous_linear_map v)
(eventually_of_forall $ λ a, (φ a).le_op_norm v)
lemma continuous_linear_map.integrable_comp {φ : α → H} (L : H →L[𝕜] E)
(φ_int : integrable φ μ) : integrable (λ (a : α), L (φ a)) μ :=
((integrable.norm φ_int).const_mul ∥L∥).mono'
(L.continuous.comp_ae_strongly_measurable φ_int.ae_strongly_measurable)
(eventually_of_forall $ λ a, L.le_op_norm (φ a))
|
89dbf5a1c8b8b34cc5161d8bf9c16874c6f1e586 | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/algebra/bounds.lean | 6d0286f9ff4362cf3d4a1a9c8f000c599bfd9bd5 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,042 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov
-/
import algebra.order.group.order_iso
import algebra.order.monoid.order_dual
import data.set.pointwise.basic
import order.bounds.order_iso
import order.conditionally_complete_lattice.basic
/-!
# Upper/lower bounds in ordered monoids and groups
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
In this file we prove a few facts like “`-s` is bounded above iff `s` is bounded below”
(`bdd_above_neg`).
-/
open function set
open_locale pointwise
section inv_neg
variables {G : Type*} [group G] [preorder G] [covariant_class G G (*) (≤)]
[covariant_class G G (swap (*)) (≤)] {s : set G} {a : G}
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma bdd_above_inv : bdd_above s⁻¹ ↔ bdd_below s := (order_iso.inv G).bdd_above_preimage
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma bdd_below_inv : bdd_below s⁻¹ ↔ bdd_above s := (order_iso.inv G).bdd_below_preimage
@[to_additive]
lemma bdd_above.inv (h : bdd_above s) : bdd_below s⁻¹ := bdd_below_inv.2 h
@[to_additive]
lemma bdd_below.inv (h : bdd_below s) : bdd_above s⁻¹ := bdd_above_inv.2 h
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma is_lub_inv : is_lub s⁻¹ a ↔ is_glb s a⁻¹ := (order_iso.inv G).is_lub_preimage
@[to_additive]
lemma is_lub_inv' : is_lub s⁻¹ a⁻¹ ↔ is_glb s a := (order_iso.inv G).is_lub_preimage'
@[to_additive]
lemma is_glb.inv (h : is_glb s a) : is_lub s⁻¹ a⁻¹ := is_lub_inv'.2 h
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma is_glb_inv : is_glb s⁻¹ a ↔ is_lub s a⁻¹ := (order_iso.inv G).is_glb_preimage
@[to_additive]
lemma is_glb_inv' : is_glb s⁻¹ a⁻¹ ↔ is_lub s a := (order_iso.inv G).is_glb_preimage'
@[to_additive]
lemma is_lub.inv (h : is_lub s a) : is_glb s⁻¹ a⁻¹ := is_glb_inv'.2 h
end inv_neg
section mul_add
variables {M : Type*} [has_mul M] [preorder M] [covariant_class M M (*) (≤)]
[covariant_class M M (swap (*)) (≤)]
@[to_additive] lemma mul_mem_upper_bounds_mul {s t : set M} {a b : M} (ha : a ∈ upper_bounds s)
(hb : b ∈ upper_bounds t) :
a * b ∈ upper_bounds (s * t) :=
forall_image2_iff.2 $ λ x hx y hy, mul_le_mul' (ha hx) (hb hy)
@[to_additive] lemma subset_upper_bounds_mul (s t : set M) :
upper_bounds s * upper_bounds t ⊆ upper_bounds (s * t) :=
image2_subset_iff.2 $ λ x hx y hy, mul_mem_upper_bounds_mul hx hy
@[to_additive] lemma mul_mem_lower_bounds_mul {s t : set M} {a b : M} (ha : a ∈ lower_bounds s)
(hb : b ∈ lower_bounds t) : a * b ∈ lower_bounds (s * t) :=
@mul_mem_upper_bounds_mul Mᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ha hb
@[to_additive] lemma subset_lower_bounds_mul (s t : set M) :
lower_bounds s * lower_bounds t ⊆ lower_bounds (s * t) :=
@subset_upper_bounds_mul Mᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _
@[to_additive] lemma bdd_above.mul {s t : set M} (hs : bdd_above s) (ht : bdd_above t) :
bdd_above (s * t) :=
(hs.mul ht).mono (subset_upper_bounds_mul s t)
@[to_additive] lemma bdd_below.mul {s t : set M} (hs : bdd_below s) (ht : bdd_below t) :
bdd_below (s * t) :=
(hs.mul ht).mono (subset_lower_bounds_mul s t)
end mul_add
section conditionally_complete_lattice
section right
variables {ι G : Type*} [group G] [conditionally_complete_lattice G]
[covariant_class G G (function.swap (*)) (≤)] [nonempty ι] {f : ι → G}
@[to_additive] lemma csupr_mul (hf : bdd_above (set.range f)) (a : G) :
(⨆ i, f i) * a = ⨆ i, f i * a :=
(order_iso.mul_right a).map_csupr hf
@[to_additive] lemma csupr_div (hf : bdd_above (set.range f)) (a : G) :
(⨆ i, f i) / a = ⨆ i, f i / a :=
by simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, csupr_mul hf]
end right
section left
variables {ι G : Type*} [group G] [conditionally_complete_lattice G]
[covariant_class G G (*) (≤)] [nonempty ι] {f : ι → G}
@[to_additive] lemma mul_csupr (hf : bdd_above (set.range f)) (a : G) :
a * (⨆ i, f i) = ⨆ i, a * f i :=
(order_iso.mul_left a).map_csupr hf
end left
end conditionally_complete_lattice
|
48ad3545fe0029ed38ff714b7652c38092c923ec | bb31430994044506fa42fd667e2d556327e18dfe | /src/algebra/ring/opposite.lean | e9d57dd7a7955e0fd2d212e3af1119eed239e893 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | sgouezel/mathlib | 0cb4e5335a2ba189fa7af96d83a377f83270e503 | 00638177efd1b2534fc5269363ebf42a7871df9a | refs/heads/master | 1,674,527,483,042 | 1,673,665,568,000 | 1,673,665,568,000 | 119,598,202 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,517,348,647,000 | 1,517,348,646,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 11,474 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import algebra.group_with_zero.basic
import algebra.group.opposite
import algebra.hom.ring
/-!
# Ring structures on the multiplicative opposite
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
-/
universes u v
variables (α : Type u)
namespace mul_opposite
instance [distrib α] : distrib αᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ left_distrib := λ x y z, unop_injective $ add_mul (unop y) (unop z) (unop x),
right_distrib := λ x y z, unop_injective $ mul_add (unop z) (unop x) (unop y),
.. mul_opposite.has_add α, .. mul_opposite.has_mul α }
instance [mul_zero_class α] : mul_zero_class αᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ zero := 0,
mul := (*),
zero_mul := λ x, unop_injective $ mul_zero $ unop x,
mul_zero := λ x, unop_injective $ zero_mul $ unop x }
instance [mul_zero_one_class α] : mul_zero_one_class αᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ .. mul_opposite.mul_zero_class α, .. mul_opposite.mul_one_class α }
instance [semigroup_with_zero α] : semigroup_with_zero αᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ .. mul_opposite.semigroup α, .. mul_opposite.mul_zero_class α }
instance [monoid_with_zero α] : monoid_with_zero αᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ .. mul_opposite.monoid α, .. mul_opposite.mul_zero_one_class α }
instance [non_unital_non_assoc_semiring α] : non_unital_non_assoc_semiring αᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ .. mul_opposite.add_comm_monoid α, .. mul_opposite.mul_zero_class α, .. mul_opposite.distrib α }
instance [non_unital_semiring α] : non_unital_semiring αᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ .. mul_opposite.semigroup_with_zero α, .. mul_opposite.non_unital_non_assoc_semiring α }
instance [non_assoc_semiring α] : non_assoc_semiring αᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ .. mul_opposite.add_monoid_with_one α, .. mul_opposite.mul_zero_one_class α,
.. mul_opposite.non_unital_non_assoc_semiring α }
instance [semiring α] : semiring αᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ .. mul_opposite.non_unital_semiring α, .. mul_opposite.non_assoc_semiring α,
.. mul_opposite.monoid_with_zero α }
instance [non_unital_comm_semiring α] : non_unital_comm_semiring αᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ .. mul_opposite.non_unital_semiring α, .. mul_opposite.comm_semigroup α }
instance [comm_semiring α] : comm_semiring αᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ .. mul_opposite.semiring α, .. mul_opposite.comm_semigroup α }
instance [non_unital_non_assoc_ring α] : non_unital_non_assoc_ring αᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ .. mul_opposite.add_comm_group α, .. mul_opposite.mul_zero_class α, .. mul_opposite.distrib α}
instance [non_unital_ring α] : non_unital_ring αᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ .. mul_opposite.add_comm_group α, .. mul_opposite.semigroup_with_zero α,
.. mul_opposite.distrib α}
instance [non_assoc_ring α] : non_assoc_ring αᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ .. mul_opposite.add_comm_group α, .. mul_opposite.mul_zero_one_class α, .. mul_opposite.distrib α,
.. mul_opposite.add_group_with_one α }
instance [ring α] : ring αᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ .. mul_opposite.monoid α, .. mul_opposite.non_assoc_ring α }
instance [non_unital_comm_ring α] : non_unital_comm_ring αᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ .. mul_opposite.non_unital_ring α, .. mul_opposite.non_unital_comm_semiring α }
instance [comm_ring α] : comm_ring αᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ .. mul_opposite.ring α, .. mul_opposite.comm_semiring α }
instance [has_zero α] [has_mul α] [no_zero_divisors α] : no_zero_divisors αᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero := λ x y (H : op (_ * _) = op (0:α)),
or.cases_on (eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero $ op_injective H)
(λ hy, or.inr $ unop_injective $ hy) (λ hx, or.inl $ unop_injective $ hx), }
instance [ring α] [is_domain α] : is_domain αᵐᵒᵖ :=
no_zero_divisors.to_is_domain _
instance [group_with_zero α] : group_with_zero αᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ mul_inv_cancel := λ x hx, unop_injective $ inv_mul_cancel $ unop_injective.ne hx,
inv_zero := unop_injective inv_zero,
.. mul_opposite.monoid_with_zero α, .. mul_opposite.div_inv_monoid α,
.. mul_opposite.nontrivial α }
end mul_opposite
namespace add_opposite
instance [distrib α] : distrib αᵃᵒᵖ :=
{ left_distrib := λ x y z, unop_injective $ @mul_add α _ _ _ x z y,
right_distrib := λ x y z, unop_injective $ @add_mul α _ _ _ y x z,
.. add_opposite.has_add α, .. @add_opposite.has_mul α _}
instance [mul_zero_class α] : mul_zero_class αᵃᵒᵖ :=
{ zero := 0,
mul := (*),
zero_mul := λ x, unop_injective $ zero_mul $ unop x,
mul_zero := λ x, unop_injective $ mul_zero $ unop x }
instance [mul_zero_one_class α] : mul_zero_one_class αᵃᵒᵖ :=
{ .. add_opposite.mul_zero_class α, .. add_opposite.mul_one_class α }
instance [semigroup_with_zero α] : semigroup_with_zero αᵃᵒᵖ :=
{ .. add_opposite.semigroup α, .. add_opposite.mul_zero_class α }
instance [monoid_with_zero α] : monoid_with_zero αᵃᵒᵖ :=
{ .. add_opposite.monoid α, .. add_opposite.mul_zero_one_class α }
instance [non_unital_non_assoc_semiring α] : non_unital_non_assoc_semiring αᵃᵒᵖ :=
{ .. add_opposite.add_comm_monoid α, .. add_opposite.mul_zero_class α, .. add_opposite.distrib α }
instance [non_unital_semiring α] : non_unital_semiring αᵃᵒᵖ :=
{ .. add_opposite.semigroup_with_zero α, .. add_opposite.non_unital_non_assoc_semiring α }
instance [non_assoc_semiring α] : non_assoc_semiring αᵃᵒᵖ :=
{ .. add_opposite.mul_zero_one_class α, .. add_opposite.non_unital_non_assoc_semiring α }
instance [semiring α] : semiring αᵃᵒᵖ :=
{ .. add_opposite.non_unital_semiring α, .. add_opposite.non_assoc_semiring α,
.. add_opposite.monoid_with_zero α }
instance [non_unital_comm_semiring α] : non_unital_comm_semiring αᵃᵒᵖ :=
{ .. add_opposite.non_unital_semiring α, .. add_opposite.comm_semigroup α }
instance [comm_semiring α] : comm_semiring αᵃᵒᵖ :=
{ .. add_opposite.semiring α, .. add_opposite.comm_semigroup α }
instance [non_unital_non_assoc_ring α] : non_unital_non_assoc_ring αᵃᵒᵖ :=
{ .. add_opposite.add_comm_group α, .. add_opposite.mul_zero_class α, .. add_opposite.distrib α}
instance [non_unital_ring α] : non_unital_ring αᵃᵒᵖ :=
{ .. add_opposite.add_comm_group α, .. add_opposite.semigroup_with_zero α,
.. add_opposite.distrib α}
instance [non_assoc_ring α] : non_assoc_ring αᵃᵒᵖ :=
{ .. add_opposite.add_comm_group α, .. add_opposite.mul_zero_one_class α, .. add_opposite.distrib α}
instance [ring α] : ring αᵃᵒᵖ :=
{ .. add_opposite.add_comm_group α, .. add_opposite.monoid α, .. add_opposite.semiring α }
instance [non_unital_comm_ring α] : non_unital_comm_ring αᵃᵒᵖ :=
{ .. add_opposite.non_unital_ring α, .. add_opposite.non_unital_comm_semiring α }
instance [comm_ring α] : comm_ring αᵃᵒᵖ :=
{ .. add_opposite.ring α, .. add_opposite.comm_semiring α }
instance [has_zero α] [has_mul α] [no_zero_divisors α] : no_zero_divisors αᵃᵒᵖ :=
{ eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero := λ x y (H : op (_ * _) = op (0:α)),
or.imp (λ hx, unop_injective hx) (λ hy, unop_injective hy)
((@eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero α _ _ _ _ _) $ op_injective H) }
instance [ring α] [is_domain α] : is_domain αᵃᵒᵖ :=
no_zero_divisors.to_is_domain _
instance [group_with_zero α] : group_with_zero αᵃᵒᵖ :=
{ mul_inv_cancel := λ x hx, unop_injective $ mul_inv_cancel $ unop_injective.ne hx,
inv_zero := unop_injective inv_zero,
.. add_opposite.monoid_with_zero α, .. add_opposite.div_inv_monoid α,
.. add_opposite.nontrivial α }
end add_opposite
open mul_opposite
/-- A non-unital ring homomorphism `f : R →ₙ+* S` such that `f x` commutes with `f y` for all `x, y`
defines a non-unital ring homomorphism to `Sᵐᵒᵖ`. -/
@[simps {fully_applied := ff}]
def non_unital_ring_hom.to_opposite {R S : Type*} [non_unital_non_assoc_semiring R]
[non_unital_non_assoc_semiring S] (f : R →ₙ+* S) (hf : ∀ x y, commute (f x) (f y)) :
R →ₙ+* Sᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ to_fun := mul_opposite.op ∘ f,
.. ((op_add_equiv : S ≃+ Sᵐᵒᵖ).to_add_monoid_hom.comp ↑f : R →+ Sᵐᵒᵖ),
.. f.to_mul_hom.to_opposite hf }
/-- A non-unital ring homomorphism `f : R →ₙ* S` such that `f x` commutes with `f y` for all `x, y`
defines a non-unital ring homomorphism from `Rᵐᵒᵖ`. -/
@[simps {fully_applied := ff}]
def non_unital_ring_hom.from_opposite {R S : Type*} [non_unital_non_assoc_semiring R]
[non_unital_non_assoc_semiring S] (f : R →ₙ+* S) (hf : ∀ x y, commute (f x) (f y)) :
Rᵐᵒᵖ →ₙ+* S :=
{ to_fun := f ∘ mul_opposite.unop,
.. (f.to_add_monoid_hom.comp (op_add_equiv : R ≃+ Rᵐᵒᵖ).symm.to_add_monoid_hom : Rᵐᵒᵖ →+ S),
.. f.to_mul_hom.from_opposite hf }
/-- A non-unital ring hom `α →ₙ+* β` can equivalently be viewed as a non-unital ring hom
`αᵐᵒᵖ →+* βᵐᵒᵖ`. This is the action of the (fully faithful) `ᵐᵒᵖ`-functor on morphisms. -/
@[simps]
def non_unital_ring_hom.op {α β} [non_unital_non_assoc_semiring α]
[non_unital_non_assoc_semiring β] : (α →ₙ+* β) ≃ (αᵐᵒᵖ →ₙ+* βᵐᵒᵖ) :=
{ to_fun := λ f, { ..f.to_add_monoid_hom.mul_op, ..f.to_mul_hom.op },
inv_fun := λ f, { ..f.to_add_monoid_hom.mul_unop, ..f.to_mul_hom.unop },
left_inv := λ f, by { ext, refl },
right_inv := λ f, by { ext, simp } }
/-- The 'unopposite' of a non-unital ring hom `αᵐᵒᵖ →ₙ+* βᵐᵒᵖ`. Inverse to
`non_unital_ring_hom.op`. -/
@[simp] def non_unital_ring_hom.unop {α β} [non_unital_non_assoc_semiring α]
[non_unital_non_assoc_semiring β] : (αᵐᵒᵖ →ₙ+* βᵐᵒᵖ) ≃ (α →ₙ+* β) := non_unital_ring_hom.op.symm
/-- A ring homomorphism `f : R →+* S` such that `f x` commutes with `f y` for all `x, y` defines
a ring homomorphism to `Sᵐᵒᵖ`. -/
@[simps {fully_applied := ff}]
def ring_hom.to_opposite {R S : Type*} [semiring R] [semiring S] (f : R →+* S)
(hf : ∀ x y, commute (f x) (f y)) : R →+* Sᵐᵒᵖ :=
{ to_fun := mul_opposite.op ∘ f,
.. ((op_add_equiv : S ≃+ Sᵐᵒᵖ).to_add_monoid_hom.comp ↑f : R →+ Sᵐᵒᵖ),
.. f.to_monoid_hom.to_opposite hf }
/-- A ring homomorphism `f : R →+* S` such that `f x` commutes with `f y` for all `x, y` defines
a ring homomorphism from `Rᵐᵒᵖ`. -/
@[simps {fully_applied := ff}]
def ring_hom.from_opposite {R S : Type*} [semiring R] [semiring S] (f : R →+* S)
(hf : ∀ x y, commute (f x) (f y)) : Rᵐᵒᵖ →+* S :=
{ to_fun := f ∘ mul_opposite.unop,
.. (f.to_add_monoid_hom.comp (op_add_equiv : R ≃+ Rᵐᵒᵖ).symm.to_add_monoid_hom : Rᵐᵒᵖ →+ S),
.. f.to_monoid_hom.from_opposite hf }
/-- A ring hom `α →+* β` can equivalently be viewed as a ring hom `αᵐᵒᵖ →+* βᵐᵒᵖ`. This is the
action of the (fully faithful) `ᵐᵒᵖ`-functor on morphisms. -/
@[simps]
def ring_hom.op {α β} [non_assoc_semiring α] [non_assoc_semiring β] :
(α →+* β) ≃ (αᵐᵒᵖ →+* βᵐᵒᵖ) :=
{ to_fun := λ f, { ..f.to_add_monoid_hom.mul_op, ..f.to_monoid_hom.op },
inv_fun := λ f, { ..f.to_add_monoid_hom.mul_unop, ..f.to_monoid_hom.unop },
left_inv := λ f, by { ext, refl },
right_inv := λ f, by { ext, simp } }
/-- The 'unopposite' of a ring hom `αᵐᵒᵖ →+* βᵐᵒᵖ`. Inverse to `ring_hom.op`. -/
@[simp] def ring_hom.unop {α β} [non_assoc_semiring α] [non_assoc_semiring β] :
(αᵐᵒᵖ →+* βᵐᵒᵖ) ≃ (α →+* β) := ring_hom.op.symm
|
6916ce94923a47af4b66dcbccfa6363a71ec0b91 | 86f6f4f8d827a196a32bfc646234b73328aeb306 | /examples/sets_functions_and_relations/unnamed_256.lean | 443ee19ae23c37806462c088e937e93c4db958a6 | [] | no_license | jamescheuk91/mathematics_in_lean | 09f1f87d2b0dce53464ff0cbe592c568ff59cf5e | 4452499264e2975bca2f42565c0925506ba5dda3 | refs/heads/master | 1,679,716,410,967 | 1,613,957,947,000 | 1,613,957,947,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 127 | lean | import tactic
variable {α : Type*}
variables (s t u : set α)
-- BEGIN
example : s \ (t ∪ u) ⊆ s \ t \ u :=
sorry
-- END |
cf3715aceae06447aa9f3b635c9c7ffa3bd8b36e | 3c9dc4ea6cc92e02634ef557110bde9eae393338 | /src/Lean/Elab/BuiltinNotation.lean | 0c01369f397858602fb81b992f7a5a9c498d7fdd | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | shingtaklam1324/lean4 | 3d7efe0c8743a4e33d3c6f4adbe1300df2e71492 | 351285a2e8ad0cef37af05851cfabf31edfb5970 | refs/heads/master | 1,676,827,679,740 | 1,610,462,623,000 | 1,610,552,340,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,692 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Init.Data.ToString
import Lean.Compiler.BorrowedAnnotation
import Lean.Meta.KAbstract
import Lean.Meta.Transform
import Lean.Elab.Term
import Lean.Elab.SyntheticMVars
namespace Lean.Elab.Term
open Meta
@[builtinTermElab anonymousCtor] def elabAnonymousCtor : TermElab := fun stx expectedType? =>
match stx with
| `(⟨$args,*⟩) => do
tryPostponeIfNoneOrMVar expectedType?
match expectedType? with
| some expectedType =>
let expectedType ← whnf expectedType
matchConstInduct expectedType.getAppFn
(fun _ => throwError! "invalid constructor ⟨...⟩, expected type must be an inductive type {indentExpr expectedType}")
(fun ival us => do
match ival.ctors with
| [ctor] =>
let newStx ← `($(mkCIdentFrom stx ctor) $(args)*)
withMacroExpansion stx newStx $ elabTerm newStx expectedType?
| _ => throwError! "invalid constructor ⟨...⟩, expected type must be an inductive type with only one constructor {indentExpr expectedType}")
| none => throwError "invalid constructor ⟨...⟩, expected type must be known"
| _ => throwUnsupportedSyntax
@[builtinTermElab borrowed] def elabBorrowed : TermElab := fun stx expectedType? =>
match stx with
| `(@& $e) => return markBorrowed (← elabTerm e expectedType?)
| _ => throwUnsupportedSyntax
@[builtinMacro Lean.Parser.Term.show] def expandShow : Macro := fun stx =>
match stx with
| `(show $type from $val) => let thisId := mkIdentFrom stx `this; `(let! $thisId : $type := $val; $thisId)
| `(show $type by $tac:tacticSeq) => `(show $type from by $tac:tacticSeq)
| _ => Macro.throwUnsupported
@[builtinMacro Lean.Parser.Term.have] def expandHave : Macro := fun stx =>
let mkId (x? : Option Syntax) : Syntax :=
x?.getD <| mkIdentFrom stx `this
match stx with
| `(have $[$x :]? $type from $val $[;]? $body) => let x := mkId x; `(let! $x : $type := $val; $body)
| `(have $[$x :]? $type := $val $[;]? $body) => let x := mkId x; `(let! $x : $type := $val; $body)
| `(have $[$x :]? $type by $tac:tacticSeq $[;]? $body) => `(have $[$x :]? $type from by $tac:tacticSeq; $body)
| _ => Macro.throwUnsupported
@[builtinMacro Lean.Parser.Term.suffices] def expandSuffices : Macro
| `(suffices $[$x :]? $type from $val $[;]? $body) => `(have $[$x :]? $type from $body; $val)
| `(suffices $[$x :]? $type by $tac:tacticSeq $[;]? $body) => `(have $[$x :]? $type from $body; by $tac:tacticSeq)
| _ => Macro.throwUnsupported
private def elabParserMacroAux (prec : Syntax) (e : Syntax) : TermElabM Syntax := do
let (some declName) ← getDeclName?
| throwError "invalid `parser!` macro, it must be used in definitions"
match extractMacroScopes declName with
| { name := Name.str _ s _, scopes := scps, .. } =>
let kind := quote declName
let s := quote s
let p ← `(Lean.Parser.leadingNode $kind $prec $e)
if scps == [] then
-- TODO simplify the following quotation as soon as we have coercions
`(OrElse.orElse (Lean.Parser.mkAntiquot $s (some $kind)) $p)
else
-- if the parser decl is hidden by hygiene, it doesn't make sense to provide an antiquotation kind
`(OrElse.orElse (Lean.Parser.mkAntiquot $s none) $p)
| _ => throwError "invalid `parser!` macro, unexpected declaration name"
@[builtinTermElab «parser!»] def elabParserMacro : TermElab :=
adaptExpander fun stx => match stx with
| `(parser! $e) => elabParserMacroAux (quote Parser.maxPrec) e
| `(parser! : $prec $e) => elabParserMacroAux prec e
| _ => throwUnsupportedSyntax
private def elabTParserMacroAux (prec : Syntax) (e : Syntax) : TermElabM Syntax := do
let declName? ← getDeclName?
match declName? with
| some declName => let kind := quote declName; `(Lean.Parser.trailingNode $kind $prec $e)
| none => throwError "invalid `tparser!` macro, it must be used in definitions"
@[builtinTermElab «tparser!»] def elabTParserMacro : TermElab :=
adaptExpander fun stx => match stx with
| `(tparser! $e) => elabTParserMacroAux (quote Parser.maxPrec) e
| `(tparser! : $prec $e) => elabTParserMacroAux prec e
| _ => throwUnsupportedSyntax
private def mkNativeReflAuxDecl (type val : Expr) : TermElabM Name := do
let auxName ← mkAuxName `_nativeRefl
let decl := Declaration.defnDecl {
name := auxName, lparams := [], type := type, value := val,
hints := ReducibilityHints.abbrev,
safety := DefinitionSafety.safe
}
addDecl decl
compileDecl decl
pure auxName
private def elabClosedTerm (stx : Syntax) (expectedType? : Option Expr) : TermElabM Expr := do
let e ← elabTermAndSynthesize stx expectedType?
if e.hasMVar then
throwError! "invalid macro application, term contains metavariables{indentExpr e}"
if e.hasFVar then
throwError! "invalid macro application, term contains free variables{indentExpr e}"
pure e
@[builtinTermElab «nativeRefl»] def elabNativeRefl : TermElab := fun stx _ => do
let arg := stx[1]
let e ← elabClosedTerm arg none
let type ← inferType e
let type ← whnf type
unless type.isConstOf `Bool || type.isConstOf `Nat do
throwError! "invalid `nativeRefl!` macro application, term must have type `Nat` or `Bool`{indentExpr type}"
let auxDeclName ← mkNativeReflAuxDecl type e
let isBool := type.isConstOf `Bool
let reduceValFn := if isBool then `Lean.reduceBool else `Lean.reduceNat
let reduceThm := if isBool then `Lean.ofReduceBool else `Lean.ofReduceNat
let aux := Lean.mkConst auxDeclName
let reduceVal := mkApp (Lean.mkConst reduceValFn) aux
let val? ← liftMetaM $ Meta.reduceNative? reduceVal
match val? with
| none => throwError! "failed to reduce term at `nativeRefl!` macro application{e}"
| some val =>
let rflPrf ← mkEqRefl val
let r := mkApp3 (Lean.mkConst reduceThm) aux val rflPrf
let eq ← mkEq e val
mkExpectedTypeHint r eq
private def getPropToDecide (expectedType? : Option Expr) : TermElabM Expr := do
tryPostponeIfNoneOrMVar expectedType?
match expectedType? with
| none => throwError "invalid macro, expected type is not available"
| some expectedType =>
synthesizeSyntheticMVars
let mut expectedType ← instantiateMVars expectedType
if expectedType.hasFVar then
expectedType ← zetaReduce expectedType
if expectedType.hasFVar || expectedType.hasMVar then
throwError! "expected type must not contain free or meta variables{indentExpr expectedType}"
pure expectedType
@[builtinTermElab «nativeDecide»] def elabNativeDecide : TermElab := fun stx expectedType? => do
let p ← getPropToDecide expectedType?
let d ← mkDecide p
let auxDeclName ← mkNativeReflAuxDecl (Lean.mkConst `Bool) d
let rflPrf ← mkEqRefl (toExpr true)
let r := mkApp3 (Lean.mkConst `Lean.ofReduceBool) (Lean.mkConst auxDeclName) (toExpr true) rflPrf
mkExpectedTypeHint r p
@[builtinTermElab Lean.Parser.Term.decide] def elabDecide : TermElab := fun stx expectedType? => do
let p ← getPropToDecide expectedType?
trace[Meta.debug]! "elabDecide: {p}"
let d ← mkDecide p
let d ← instantiateMVars d
let s := d.appArg! -- get instance from `d`
let rflPrf ← mkEqRefl (toExpr true)
pure $ mkApp3 (Lean.mkConst `ofDecideEqTrue) p s rflPrf
@[builtinTermElab panic] def elabPanic : TermElab := fun stx expectedType? => do
let arg := stx[1]
let pos ← getRefPosition
let env ← getEnv
let stxNew ← match (← getDeclName?) with
| some declName => `(panicWithPosWithDecl $(quote (toString env.mainModule)) $(quote (toString declName)) $(quote pos.line) $(quote pos.column) $arg)
| none => `(panicWithPos $(quote (toString env.mainModule)) $(quote pos.line) $(quote pos.column) $arg)
withMacroExpansion stx stxNew $ elabTerm stxNew expectedType?
@[builtinMacro Lean.Parser.Term.unreachable] def expandUnreachable : Macro := fun stx =>
`(panic! "unreachable code has been reached")
@[builtinMacro Lean.Parser.Term.assert] def expandAssert : Macro := fun stx =>
-- TODO: support for disabling runtime assertions
let cond := stx[1]
let body := stx[3]
match cond.reprint with
| some code => `(if $cond then $body else panic! ("assertion violation: " ++ $(quote code)))
| none => `(if $cond then $body else panic! ("assertion violation"))
@[builtinMacro Lean.Parser.Term.dbgTrace] def expandDbgTrace : Macro := fun stx =>
let arg := stx[1]
let body := stx[3]
if arg.getKind == interpolatedStrKind then
`(dbgTrace (s! $arg) fun _ => $body)
else
`(dbgTrace (toString $arg) fun _ => $body)
@[builtinMacro Lean.Parser.Term.«sorry»] def expandSorry : Macro := fun _ =>
`(sorryAx _ false)
@[builtinTermElab emptyC] def expandEmptyC : TermElab := fun stx expectedType? => do
let stxNew ← `(EmptyCollection.emptyCollection)
withMacroExpansion stx stxNew $ elabTerm stxNew expectedType?
/-- Return syntax `Prod.mk elems[0] (Prod.mk elems[1] ... (Prod.mk elems[elems.size - 2] elems[elems.size - 1])))` -/
partial def mkPairs (elems : Array Syntax) : MacroM Syntax :=
let rec loop (i : Nat) (acc : Syntax) := do
if i > 0 then
let i := i - 1
let elem := elems[i]
let acc ← `(Prod.mk $elem $acc)
loop i acc
else
pure acc
loop (elems.size - 1) elems.back
private partial def hasCDot : Syntax → Bool
| Syntax.node k args =>
if k == `Lean.Parser.Term.paren then false
else if k == `Lean.Parser.Term.cdot then true
else args.any hasCDot
| _ => false
/--
Auxiliary function for expandind the `·` notation.
The extra state `Array Syntax` contains the new binder names.
If `stx` is a `·`, we create a fresh identifier, store in the
extra state, and return it. Otherwise, we just return `stx`. -/
private partial def expandCDot : Syntax → StateT (Array Syntax) MacroM Syntax
| stx@(Syntax.node k args) =>
if k == `Lean.Parser.Term.paren then pure stx
else if k == `Lean.Parser.Term.cdot then withFreshMacroScope do
let id ← `(a)
modify fun s => s.push id;
pure id
else do
let args ← args.mapM expandCDot
pure $ Syntax.node k args
| stx => pure stx
/--
Return `some` if succeeded expanding `·` notation occurring in
the given syntax. Otherwise, return `none`.
Examples:
- `· + 1` => `fun _a_1 => _a_1 + 1`
- `f · · b` => `fun _a_1 _a_2 => f _a_1 _a_2 b` -/
def expandCDot? (stx : Syntax) : MacroM (Option Syntax) := do
if hasCDot stx then
let (newStx, binders) ← (expandCDot stx).run #[];
`(fun $binders* => $newStx)
else
pure none
/--
Try to expand `·` notation, and if successful elaborate result.
This method is used to elaborate the Lean parentheses notation.
Recall that in Lean the `·` notation must be surrounded by parentheses.
We may change this is the future, but right now, here are valid examples
- `(· + 1)`
- `(f ⟨·, 1⟩ ·)`
- `(· + ·)`
- `(f · a b)` -/
private def elabCDot (stx : Syntax) (expectedType? : Option Expr) : TermElabM Expr := do
match (← liftMacroM <| expandCDot? stx) with
| some stx' => withMacroExpansion stx stx' (elabTerm stx' expectedType?)
| none => elabTerm stx expectedType?
@[builtinTermElab paren] def elabParen : TermElab := fun stx expectedType? => do
match stx with
| `(()) => return Lean.mkConst `Unit.unit
| `(($e : $type)) =>
let type ← withSynthesize (mayPostpone := true) $ elabType type
let e ← elabCDot e type
ensureHasType type e
| `(($e)) => elabCDot e expectedType?
| `(($e, $es,*)) =>
let pairs ← liftMacroM <| mkPairs (#[e] ++ es)
withMacroExpansion stx pairs (elabCDot pairs expectedType?)
| _ => throwError "unexpected parentheses notation"
@[builtinTermElab subst] def elabSubst : TermElab := fun stx expectedType? => do
let expectedType ← tryPostponeIfHasMVars expectedType? "invalid `▸` notation"
match stx with
| `($heq ▸ $h) => do
let mut heq ← elabTerm heq none
let heqType ← inferType heq
let heqType ← instantiateMVars heqType
match (← Meta.matchEq? heqType) with
| none => throwError! "invalid `▸` notation, argument{indentExpr heq}\nhas type{indentExpr heqType}\nequality expected"
| some (α, lhs, rhs) =>
let mut lhs := lhs
let mut rhs := rhs
let mkMotive (typeWithLooseBVar : Expr) :=
withLocalDeclD (← mkFreshUserName `x) α fun x => do
mkLambdaFVars #[x] $ typeWithLooseBVar.instantiate1 x
let mut expectedAbst ← kabstract expectedType rhs
unless expectedAbst.hasLooseBVars do
expectedAbst ← kabstract expectedType lhs
unless expectedAbst.hasLooseBVars do
throwError! "invalid `▸` notation, expected type{indentExpr expectedType}\ndoes contain equation left-hand-side nor right-hand-side{indentExpr heqType}"
heq ← mkEqSymm heq
(lhs, rhs) := (rhs, lhs)
let hExpectedType := expectedAbst.instantiate1 lhs
let h ← withRef h do
let h ← elabTerm h hExpectedType
try
ensureHasType hExpectedType h
catch ex =>
-- if `rhs` occurs in `hType`, we try to apply `heq` to `h` too
let hType ← inferType h
let hTypeAbst ← kabstract hType rhs
unless hTypeAbst.hasLooseBVars do
throw ex
let hTypeNew := hTypeAbst.instantiate1 lhs
unless (← isDefEq hExpectedType hTypeNew) do
throw ex
mkEqNDRec (← mkMotive hTypeAbst) h (← mkEqSymm heq)
mkEqNDRec (← mkMotive expectedAbst) h heq
| _ => throwUnsupportedSyntax
@[builtinTermElab stateRefT] def elabStateRefT : TermElab := fun stx _ => do
let σ ← elabType stx[1]
let mut m := stx[2]
if m.getKind == `Lean.Parser.Term.macroDollarArg then
m := m[1]
let m ← elabTerm m (← mkArrow (mkSort levelOne) (mkSort levelOne))
let ω ← mkFreshExprMVar (mkSort levelOne)
let stWorld ← mkAppM `STWorld #[ω, m]
discard <| mkInstMVar stWorld
mkAppM `StateRefT' #[ω, σ, m]
@[builtinTermElab noindex] def elabNoindex : TermElab := fun stx expectedType? => do
let e ← elabTerm stx[1] expectedType?
return DiscrTree.mkNoindexAnnotation e
end Lean.Elab.Term
|
3bdc3cb9aa76c6623d121fb5f2192956b0af66f5 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/ring_theory/adjoin/basic.lean | 042265be90932fd1dc6e9bddae455bf9caba4acc | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 15,759 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import algebra.algebra.operations
import algebra.algebra.subalgebra.tower
import linear_algebra.prod
import linear_algebra.finsupp
/-!
# Adjoining elements to form subalgebras
This file develops the basic theory of subalgebras of an R-algebra generated
by a set of elements. A basic interface for `adjoin` is set up.
## Tags
adjoin, algebra
-/
universes u v w
open_locale pointwise
open submodule subsemiring
variables {R : Type u} {A : Type v} {B : Type w}
namespace algebra
section semiring
variables [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [semiring B]
variables [algebra R A] [algebra R B] {s t : set A}
theorem subset_adjoin : s ⊆ adjoin R s :=
algebra.gc.le_u_l s
theorem adjoin_le {S : subalgebra R A} (H : s ⊆ S) : adjoin R s ≤ S :=
algebra.gc.l_le H
lemma adjoin_eq_Inf : adjoin R s = Inf {p | s ⊆ p} :=
le_antisymm (le_Inf (λ _ h, adjoin_le h)) (Inf_le subset_adjoin)
theorem adjoin_le_iff {S : subalgebra R A} : adjoin R s ≤ S ↔ s ⊆ S:=
algebra.gc _ _
theorem adjoin_mono (H : s ⊆ t) : adjoin R s ≤ adjoin R t :=
algebra.gc.monotone_l H
theorem adjoin_eq_of_le (S : subalgebra R A) (h₁ : s ⊆ S) (h₂ : S ≤ adjoin R s) : adjoin R s = S :=
le_antisymm (adjoin_le h₁) h₂
theorem adjoin_eq (S : subalgebra R A) : adjoin R ↑S = S :=
adjoin_eq_of_le _ (set.subset.refl _) subset_adjoin
lemma adjoin_Union {α : Type*} (s : α → set A) :
adjoin R (set.Union s) = ⨆ (i : α), adjoin R (s i) :=
(@algebra.gc R A _ _ _).l_supr
lemma adjoin_attach_bUnion [decidable_eq A] {α : Type*} {s : finset α} (f : s → finset A) :
adjoin R (s.attach.bUnion f : set A) = ⨆ x, adjoin R (f x) :=
by simpa [adjoin_Union]
@[elab_as_eliminator] theorem adjoin_induction {p : A → Prop} {x : A} (h : x ∈ adjoin R s)
(Hs : ∀ x ∈ s, p x)
(Halg : ∀ r, p (algebra_map R A r))
(Hadd : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x + y))
(Hmul : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x * y)) : p x :=
let S : subalgebra R A :=
{ carrier := p, mul_mem' := Hmul, add_mem' := Hadd, algebra_map_mem' := Halg } in
adjoin_le (show s ≤ S, from Hs) h
/-- Induction principle for the algebra generated by a set `s`: show that `p x y` holds for any
`x y ∈ adjoin R s` given that that it holds for `x y ∈ s` and that it satisfies a number of
natural properties. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator]
lemma adjoin_induction₂ {p : A → A → Prop} {a b : A} (ha : a ∈ adjoin R s) (hb : b ∈ adjoin R s)
(Hs : ∀ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), p x y)
(Halg : ∀ r₁ r₂, p (algebra_map R A r₁) (algebra_map R A r₂))
(Halg_left : ∀ r (x ∈ s), p (algebra_map R A r) x)
(Halg_right : ∀ r (x ∈ s), p x (algebra_map R A r))
(Hadd_left : ∀ x₁ x₂ y, p x₁ y → p x₂ y → p (x₁ + x₂) y)
(Hadd_right : ∀ x y₁ y₂, p x y₁ → p x y₂ → p x (y₁ + y₂))
(Hmul_left : ∀ x₁ x₂ y, p x₁ y → p x₂ y → p (x₁ * x₂) y)
(Hmul_right : ∀ x y₁ y₂, p x y₁ → p x y₂ → p x (y₁ * y₂)) : p a b :=
begin
refine adjoin_induction hb _ (λ r, _) (Hadd_right a) (Hmul_right a),
{ exact adjoin_induction ha Hs Halg_left (λ x y Hx Hy z hz, Hadd_left x y z (Hx z hz) (Hy z hz))
(λ x y Hx Hy z hz, Hmul_left x y z (Hx z hz) (Hy z hz)) },
{ exact adjoin_induction ha (Halg_right r) (λ r', Halg r' r)
(λ x y, Hadd_left x y ((algebra_map R A) r))
(λ x y, Hmul_left x y ((algebra_map R A) r)) },
end
/-- The difference with `algebra.adjoin_induction` is that this acts on the subtype. -/
lemma adjoin_induction' {p : adjoin R s → Prop} (Hs : ∀ x (h : x ∈ s), p ⟨x, subset_adjoin h⟩)
(Halg : ∀ r, p (algebra_map R _ r)) (Hadd : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x + y))
(Hmul : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x * y)) (x : adjoin R s) : p x :=
subtype.rec_on x $ λ x hx, begin
refine exists.elim _ (λ (hx : x ∈ adjoin R s) (hc : p ⟨x, hx⟩), hc),
exact adjoin_induction hx (λ x hx, ⟨subset_adjoin hx, Hs x hx⟩)
(λ r, ⟨subalgebra.algebra_map_mem _ r, Halg r⟩)
(λ x y hx hy, exists.elim hx $ λ hx' hx, exists.elim hy $ λ hy' hy,
⟨subalgebra.add_mem _ hx' hy', Hadd _ _ hx hy⟩) (λ x y hx hy, exists.elim hx $ λ hx' hx,
exists.elim hy $ λ hy' hy, ⟨subalgebra.mul_mem _ hx' hy', Hmul _ _ hx hy⟩),
end
@[simp] lemma adjoin_adjoin_coe_preimage {s : set A} :
adjoin R ((coe : adjoin R s → A) ⁻¹' s) = ⊤ :=
begin
refine eq_top_iff.2 (λ x, adjoin_induction' (λ a ha, _) (λ r, _) (λ _ _, _) (λ _ _, _) x),
{ exact subset_adjoin ha },
{ exact subalgebra.algebra_map_mem _ r },
{ exact subalgebra.add_mem _ },
{ exact subalgebra.mul_mem _ }
end
lemma adjoin_union (s t : set A) : adjoin R (s ∪ t) = adjoin R s ⊔ adjoin R t :=
(algebra.gc : galois_connection _ (coe : subalgebra R A → set A)).l_sup
variables (R A)
@[simp] theorem adjoin_empty : adjoin R (∅ : set A) = ⊥ :=
show adjoin R ⊥ = ⊥, by { apply galois_connection.l_bot, exact algebra.gc }
@[simp] theorem adjoin_univ : adjoin R (set.univ : set A) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 $ λ x, subset_adjoin $ set.mem_univ _
variables (R) {A} (s)
theorem adjoin_eq_span : (adjoin R s).to_submodule = span R (submonoid.closure s) :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ intros r hr, rcases subsemiring.mem_closure_iff_exists_list.1 hr with ⟨L, HL, rfl⟩, clear hr,
induction L with hd tl ih, { exact zero_mem _ },
rw list.forall_mem_cons at HL,
rw [list.map_cons, list.sum_cons],
refine submodule.add_mem _ _ (ih HL.2),
replace HL := HL.1, clear ih tl,
suffices : ∃ z r (hr : r ∈ submonoid.closure s), has_smul.smul z r = list.prod hd,
{ rcases this with ⟨z, r, hr, hzr⟩, rw ← hzr,
exact smul_mem _ _ (subset_span hr) },
induction hd with hd tl ih, { exact ⟨1, 1, (submonoid.closure s).one_mem', one_smul _ _⟩ },
rw list.forall_mem_cons at HL,
rcases (ih HL.2) with ⟨z, r, hr, hzr⟩, rw [list.prod_cons, ← hzr],
rcases HL.1 with ⟨hd, rfl⟩ | hs,
{ refine ⟨hd * z, r, hr, _⟩,
rw [algebra.smul_def, algebra.smul_def, (algebra_map _ _).map_mul, _root_.mul_assoc] },
{ exact ⟨z, hd * r, submonoid.mul_mem _ (submonoid.subset_closure hs) hr,
(mul_smul_comm _ _ _).symm⟩ } },
refine span_le.2 _,
change submonoid.closure s ≤ (adjoin R s).to_subsemiring.to_submonoid,
exact submonoid.closure_le.2 subset_adjoin
end
lemma span_le_adjoin (s : set A) : span R s ≤ (adjoin R s).to_submodule :=
span_le.mpr subset_adjoin
lemma adjoin_to_submodule_le {s : set A} {t : submodule R A} :
(adjoin R s).to_submodule ≤ t ↔ ↑(submonoid.closure s) ⊆ (t : set A) :=
by rw [adjoin_eq_span, span_le]
lemma adjoin_eq_span_of_subset {s : set A} (hs : ↑(submonoid.closure s) ⊆ (span R s : set A)) :
(adjoin R s).to_submodule = span R s :=
le_antisymm ((adjoin_to_submodule_le R).mpr hs) (span_le_adjoin R s)
@[simp] lemma adjoin_span {s : set A} :
adjoin R (submodule.span R s : set A) = adjoin R s :=
le_antisymm (adjoin_le (span_le_adjoin _ _)) (adjoin_mono submodule.subset_span)
lemma adjoin_image (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (s : set A) :
adjoin R (f '' s) = (adjoin R s).map f :=
le_antisymm (adjoin_le $ set.image_subset _ subset_adjoin) $
subalgebra.map_le.2 $ adjoin_le $ set.image_subset_iff.1 subset_adjoin
@[simp] lemma adjoin_insert_adjoin (x : A) :
adjoin R (insert x ↑(adjoin R s)) = adjoin R (insert x s) :=
le_antisymm
(adjoin_le (set.insert_subset.mpr
⟨subset_adjoin (set.mem_insert _ _), adjoin_mono (set.subset_insert _ _)⟩))
(algebra.adjoin_mono (set.insert_subset_insert algebra.subset_adjoin))
lemma adjoin_prod_le (s : set A) (t : set B) :
adjoin R (s ×ˢ t) ≤ (adjoin R s).prod (adjoin R t) :=
adjoin_le $ set.prod_mono subset_adjoin subset_adjoin
lemma mem_adjoin_of_map_mul {s} {x : A} {f : A →ₗ[R] B} (hf : ∀ a₁ a₂, f(a₁ * a₂) = f a₁ * f a₂)
(h : x ∈ adjoin R s) : f x ∈ adjoin R (f '' (s ∪ {1})) :=
begin
refine @adjoin_induction R A _ _ _ _ (λ a, f a ∈ adjoin R (f '' (s ∪ {1}))) x h
(λ a ha, subset_adjoin ⟨a, ⟨set.subset_union_left _ _ ha, rfl⟩⟩)
(λ r, _)
(λ y z hy hz, by simpa [hy, hz] using subalgebra.add_mem _ hy hz)
(λ y z hy hz, by simpa [hy, hz, hf y z] using subalgebra.mul_mem _ hy hz),
have : f 1 ∈ adjoin R (f '' (s ∪ {1})) :=
subset_adjoin ⟨1, ⟨set.subset_union_right _ _ $ set.mem_singleton 1, rfl⟩⟩,
replace this := subalgebra.smul_mem (adjoin R (f '' (s ∪ {1}))) this r,
convert this,
rw algebra_map_eq_smul_one,
exact f.map_smul _ _
end
lemma adjoin_inl_union_inr_eq_prod (s) (t) :
adjoin R (linear_map.inl R A B '' (s ∪ {1}) ∪ linear_map.inr R A B '' (t ∪ {1})) =
(adjoin R s).prod (adjoin R t) :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ simp only [adjoin_le_iff, set.insert_subset, subalgebra.zero_mem, subalgebra.one_mem,
subset_adjoin, -- the rest comes from `squeeze_simp`
set.union_subset_iff, linear_map.coe_inl, set.mk_preimage_prod_right,
set.image_subset_iff, set_like.mem_coe, set.mk_preimage_prod_left, linear_map.coe_inr,
and_self, set.union_singleton, subalgebra.coe_prod] },
{ rintro ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨ha, hb⟩,
let P := adjoin R (linear_map.inl R A B '' (s ∪ {1}) ∪ linear_map.inr R A B '' (t ∪ {1})),
have Ha : (a, (0 : B)) ∈ adjoin R ((linear_map.inl R A B) '' (s ∪ {1})) :=
mem_adjoin_of_map_mul R (linear_map.inl_map_mul) ha,
have Hb : ((0 : A), b) ∈ adjoin R ((linear_map.inr R A B) '' (t ∪ {1})) :=
mem_adjoin_of_map_mul R (linear_map.inr_map_mul) hb,
replace Ha : (a, (0 : B)) ∈ P := adjoin_mono (set.subset_union_left _ _) Ha,
replace Hb : ((0 : A), b) ∈ P := adjoin_mono (set.subset_union_right _ _) Hb,
simpa using subalgebra.add_mem _ Ha Hb }
end
/-- If all elements of `s : set A` commute pairwise, then `adjoin R s` is a commutative
semiring. -/
def adjoin_comm_semiring_of_comm {s : set A} (hcomm : ∀ (a ∈ s) (b ∈ s), a * b = b * a) :
comm_semiring (adjoin R s) :=
{ mul_comm := λ x y,
begin
ext,
simp only [subalgebra.coe_mul],
exact adjoin_induction₂ x.prop y.prop
hcomm
(λ _ _, by rw [commutes])
(λ r x hx, commutes r x) (λ r x hx, (commutes r x).symm)
(λ _ _ _ h₁ h₂, by simp only [add_mul, mul_add, h₁, h₂])
(λ _ _ _ h₁ h₂, by simp only [add_mul, mul_add, h₁, h₂])
(λ x₁ x₂ y₁ h₁ h₂, by rw [mul_assoc, h₂, ←mul_assoc y₁, ←h₁, mul_assoc x₁])
(λ x₁ x₂ y₁ h₁ h₂, by rw [mul_assoc x₂, ←h₂, ←mul_assoc x₂, ←h₁, ←mul_assoc])
end,
..(adjoin R s).to_semiring }
lemma adjoin_singleton_one : adjoin R ({1} : set A) = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 $ adjoin_le $ set.singleton_subset_iff.2 $ set_like.mem_coe.2 $ one_mem _
lemma self_mem_adjoin_singleton (x : A) : x ∈ adjoin R ({x} : set A) :=
algebra.subset_adjoin (set.mem_singleton_iff.mpr rfl)
end semiring
section comm_semiring
variables [comm_semiring R] [comm_semiring A]
variables [algebra R A] {s t : set A}
variables (R s t)
theorem adjoin_union_eq_adjoin_adjoin :
adjoin R (s ∪ t) = (adjoin (adjoin R s) t).restrict_scalars R :=
le_antisymm
(closure_mono $ set.union_subset
(set.range_subset_iff.2 $ λ r, or.inl ⟨algebra_map R (adjoin R s) r, rfl⟩)
(set.union_subset_union_left _ $ λ x hxs, ⟨⟨_, subset_adjoin hxs⟩, rfl⟩))
(closure_le.2 $ set.union_subset
(set.range_subset_iff.2 $ λ x, adjoin_mono (set.subset_union_left _ _) x.2)
(set.subset.trans (set.subset_union_right _ _) subset_adjoin))
theorem adjoin_union_coe_submodule : (adjoin R (s ∪ t)).to_submodule =
(adjoin R s).to_submodule * (adjoin R t).to_submodule :=
begin
rw [adjoin_eq_span, adjoin_eq_span, adjoin_eq_span, span_mul_span],
congr' 1 with z, simp [submonoid.closure_union, submonoid.mem_sup, set.mem_mul]
end
lemma adjoin_adjoin_of_tower [semiring B] [algebra R B] [algebra A B] [is_scalar_tower R A B]
(s : set B) : adjoin A (adjoin R s : set B) = adjoin A s :=
begin
apply le_antisymm (adjoin_le _),
{ exact adjoin_mono subset_adjoin },
{ change adjoin R s ≤ (adjoin A s).restrict_scalars R,
refine adjoin_le _,
exact subset_adjoin }
end
variable {R}
lemma pow_smul_mem_of_smul_subset_of_mem_adjoin
[comm_semiring B] [algebra R B] [algebra A B] [is_scalar_tower R A B]
(r : A) (s : set B) (B' : subalgebra R B) (hs : r • s ⊆ B') {x : B} (hx : x ∈ adjoin R s)
(hr : algebra_map A B r ∈ B') :
∃ n₀ : ℕ, ∀ n ≥ n₀, r ^ n • x ∈ B' :=
begin
change x ∈ (adjoin R s).to_submodule at hx,
rw [adjoin_eq_span, finsupp.mem_span_iff_total] at hx,
rcases hx with ⟨l, rfl : l.sum (λ (i : submonoid.closure s) (c : R), c • ↑i) = x⟩,
choose n₁ n₂ using (λ x : submonoid.closure s, submonoid.pow_smul_mem_closure_smul r s x.prop),
use l.support.sup n₁,
intros n hn,
rw finsupp.smul_sum,
refine B'.to_submodule.sum_mem _,
intros a ha,
have : n ≥ n₁ a := le_trans (finset.le_sup ha) hn,
dsimp only,
rw [← tsub_add_cancel_of_le this, pow_add, ← smul_smul,
← is_scalar_tower.algebra_map_smul A (l a) (a : B), smul_smul (r ^ n₁ a),
mul_comm, ← smul_smul, smul_def, map_pow, is_scalar_tower.algebra_map_smul],
apply subalgebra.mul_mem _ (subalgebra.pow_mem _ hr _) _,
refine subalgebra.smul_mem _ _ _,
change _ ∈ B'.to_submonoid,
rw ← submonoid.closure_eq B'.to_submonoid,
apply submonoid.closure_mono hs (n₂ a),
end
lemma pow_smul_mem_adjoin_smul (r : R) (s : set A) {x : A} (hx : x ∈ adjoin R s) :
∃ n₀ : ℕ, ∀ n ≥ n₀, r ^ n • x ∈ adjoin R (r • s) :=
pow_smul_mem_of_smul_subset_of_mem_adjoin r s _ subset_adjoin hx (subalgebra.algebra_map_mem _ _)
end comm_semiring
section ring
variables [comm_ring R] [ring A]
variables [algebra R A] {s t : set A}
variables {R s t}
theorem adjoin_int (s : set R) : adjoin ℤ s = subalgebra_of_subring (subring.closure s) :=
le_antisymm (adjoin_le subring.subset_closure)
(subring.closure_le.2 subset_adjoin : subring.closure s ≤ (adjoin ℤ s).to_subring)
theorem mem_adjoin_iff {s : set A} {x : A} :
x ∈ adjoin R s ↔ x ∈ subring.closure (set.range (algebra_map R A) ∪ s) :=
⟨λ hx, subsemiring.closure_induction hx subring.subset_closure (subring.zero_mem _)
(subring.one_mem _) (λ _ _, subring.add_mem _) ( λ _ _, subring.mul_mem _),
suffices subring.closure (set.range ⇑(algebra_map R A) ∪ s) ≤ (adjoin R s).to_subring,
from @this x, subring.closure_le.2 subsemiring.subset_closure⟩
theorem adjoin_eq_ring_closure (s : set A) :
(adjoin R s).to_subring = subring.closure (set.range (algebra_map R A) ∪ s) :=
subring.ext $ λ x, mem_adjoin_iff
variables (R)
/-- If all elements of `s : set A` commute pairwise, then `adjoin R s` is a commutative
ring. -/
def adjoin_comm_ring_of_comm {s : set A} (hcomm : ∀ (a ∈ s) (b ∈ s), a * b = b * a) :
comm_ring (adjoin R s) :=
{ ..(adjoin R s).to_ring,
..adjoin_comm_semiring_of_comm R hcomm }
end ring
end algebra
open algebra subalgebra
namespace alg_hom
variables [comm_semiring R] [semiring A] [semiring B] [algebra R A] [algebra R B]
lemma map_adjoin (φ : A →ₐ[R] B) (s : set A) :
(adjoin R s).map φ = adjoin R (φ '' s) :=
(adjoin_image _ _ _).symm
lemma adjoin_le_equalizer (φ₁ φ₂ : A →ₐ[R] B) {s : set A} (h : s.eq_on φ₁ φ₂) :
adjoin R s ≤ φ₁.equalizer φ₂ :=
adjoin_le h
lemma ext_of_adjoin_eq_top {s : set A} (h : adjoin R s = ⊤) ⦃φ₁ φ₂ : A →ₐ[R] B⦄
(hs : s.eq_on φ₁ φ₂) : φ₁ = φ₂ :=
ext $ λ x, adjoin_le_equalizer φ₁ φ₂ hs $ h.symm ▸ trivial
end alg_hom
|
2419c9dc2023b474ea0336df8e1e738fec9d59fd | 00de0c30dd1b090ed139f65c82ea6deb48c3f4c2 | /src/topology/algebra/module.lean | 12b82e8e53025ca21e57cb38bafe3f716db0f04a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | paulvanwamelen/mathlib | 4b9c5c19eec71b475f3dd515cd8785f1c8515f26 | 79e296bdc9f83b9447dc1b81730d36f63a99f72d | refs/heads/master | 1,667,766,172,625 | 1,590,239,595,000 | 1,590,239,595,000 | 266,392,625 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,590,257,277,000 | 1,590,257,277,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 35,993 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jan-David Salchow, Sébastien Gouëzel, Jean Lo, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import topology.algebra.ring
import ring_theory.algebra
import linear_algebra.projection
/-!
# Theory of topological modules and continuous linear maps.
We define classes `topological_semimodule`, `topological_module` and `topological_vector_spaces`,
as extensions of the corresponding algebraic classes where the algebraic operations are continuous.
We also define continuous linear maps, as linear maps between topological modules which are
continuous. The set of continuous linear maps between the topological `R`-modules `M` and `M₂` is
denoted by `M →L[R] M₂`.
Continuous linear equivalences are denoted by `M ≃L[R] M₂`.
## Implementation notes
Topological vector spaces are defined as an `abbreviation` for topological modules,
if the base ring is a field. This has as advantage that topological vector spaces are completely
transparent for type class inference, which means that all instances for topological modules
are immediately picked up for vector spaces as well.
A cosmetic disadvantage is that one can not extend topological vector spaces.
The solution is to extend `topological_module` instead.
-/
open filter
open_locale topological_space
universes u v w u'
section prio
set_option default_priority 100 -- see Note [default priority]
/-- A topological semimodule, over a semiring which is also a topological space, is a
semimodule in which scalar multiplication is continuous. In applications, R will be a topological
semiring and M a topological additive semigroup, but this is not needed for the definition -/
class topological_semimodule (R : Type u) (M : Type v)
[semiring R] [topological_space R]
[topological_space M] [add_comm_monoid M]
[semimodule R M] : Prop :=
(continuous_smul : continuous (λp : R × M, p.1 • p.2))
end prio
section
variables {R : Type u} {M : Type v}
[semiring R] [topological_space R]
[topological_space M] [add_comm_monoid M]
[semimodule R M] [topological_semimodule R M]
lemma continuous_smul : continuous (λp:R×M, p.1 • p.2) :=
topological_semimodule.continuous_smul
lemma continuous.smul {α : Type*} [topological_space α] {f : α → R} {g : α → M}
(hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g) : continuous (λp, f p • g p) :=
continuous_smul.comp (hf.prod_mk hg)
lemma tendsto_smul {c : R} {x : M} : tendsto (λp:R×M, p.fst • p.snd) (𝓝 (c, x)) (𝓝 (c • x)) :=
continuous_smul.tendsto _
lemma filter.tendsto.smul {α : Type*} {l : filter α} {f : α → R} {g : α → M} {c : R} {x : M}
(hf : tendsto f l (𝓝 c)) (hg : tendsto g l (𝓝 x)) : tendsto (λ a, f a • g a) l (𝓝 (c • x)) :=
tendsto_smul.comp (hf.prod_mk_nhds hg)
end
section prio
set_option default_priority 100 -- see Note [default priority]
/-- A topological module, over a ring which is also a topological space, is a module in which
scalar multiplication is continuous. In applications, `R` will be a topological ring and `M` a
topological additive group, but this is not needed for the definition -/
class topological_module (R : Type u) (M : Type v)
[ring R] [topological_space R]
[topological_space M] [add_comm_group M]
[module R M]
extends topological_semimodule R M : Prop
/-- A topological vector space is a topological module over a field. -/
abbreviation topological_vector_space (R : Type u) (M : Type v)
[field R] [topological_space R]
[topological_space M] [add_comm_group M] [module R M] :=
topological_module R M
end prio
section
variables {R : Type*} {M : Type*}
[ring R] [topological_space R]
[topological_space M] [add_comm_group M]
[module R M] [topological_module R M]
/-- Scalar multiplication by a unit is a homeomorphism from a
topological module onto itself. -/
protected def homeomorph.smul_of_unit (a : units R) : M ≃ₜ M :=
{ to_fun := λ x, (a : R) • x,
inv_fun := λ x, ((a⁻¹ : units R) : R) • x,
right_inv := λ x, calc (a : R) • ((a⁻¹ : units R) : R) • x = x :
by rw [smul_smul, units.mul_inv, one_smul],
left_inv := λ x, calc ((a⁻¹ : units R) : R) • (a : R) • x = x :
by rw [smul_smul, units.inv_mul, one_smul],
continuous_to_fun := continuous_const.smul continuous_id,
continuous_inv_fun := continuous_const.smul continuous_id }
lemma is_open_map_smul_of_unit (a : units R) : is_open_map (λ (x : M), (a : R) • x) :=
(homeomorph.smul_of_unit a).is_open_map
lemma is_closed_map_smul_of_unit (a : units R) : is_closed_map (λ (x : M), (a : R) • x) :=
(homeomorph.smul_of_unit a).is_closed_map
/-- If `M` is a topological module over `R` and `0` is a limit of invertible elements of `R`, then
`⊤` is the only submodule of `M` with a nonempty interior. See also
`submodule.eq_top_of_nonempty_interior` for a `normed_space` version. -/
lemma submodule.eq_top_of_nonempty_interior' [topological_add_monoid M]
(h : nhds_within (0:R) {x | is_unit x} ≠ ⊥)
(s : submodule R M) (hs : (interior (s:set M)).nonempty) :
s = ⊤ :=
begin
rcases hs with ⟨y, hy⟩,
refine (submodule.eq_top_iff'.2 $ λ x, _),
rw [mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds] at hy,
have : tendsto (λ c:R, y + c • x) (nhds_within 0 {x | is_unit x}) (𝓝 (y + (0:R) • x)),
from tendsto_const_nhds.add ((tendsto_nhds_within_of_tendsto_nhds tendsto_id).smul
tendsto_const_nhds),
rw [zero_smul, add_zero] at this,
rcases nonempty_of_mem_sets h (inter_mem_sets (mem_map.1 (this hy)) self_mem_nhds_within)
with ⟨_, hu, u, rfl⟩,
have hy' : y ∈ ↑s := mem_of_nhds hy,
exact (s.smul_mem_iff' _).1 ((s.add_mem_iff_right hy').1 hu)
end
end
section
variables {R : Type*} {M : Type*} {a : R}
[field R] [topological_space R]
[topological_space M] [add_comm_group M]
[vector_space R M] [topological_vector_space R M]
/-- Scalar multiplication by a non-zero field element is a
homeomorphism from a topological vector space onto itself. -/
protected def homeomorph.smul_of_ne_zero (ha : a ≠ 0) : M ≃ₜ M :=
{.. homeomorph.smul_of_unit (units.mk0 a ha)}
lemma is_open_map_smul_of_ne_zero (ha : a ≠ 0) : is_open_map (λ (x : M), a • x) :=
(homeomorph.smul_of_ne_zero ha).is_open_map
lemma is_closed_map_smul_of_ne_zero (ha : a ≠ 0) : is_closed_map (λ (x : M), a • x) :=
(homeomorph.smul_of_ne_zero ha).is_closed_map
end
/-- Continuous linear maps between modules. We only put the type classes that are necessary for the
definition, although in applications `M` and `M₂` will be topological modules over the topological
ring `R`. -/
structure continuous_linear_map
(R : Type*) [ring R]
(M : Type*) [topological_space M] [add_comm_group M]
(M₂ : Type*) [topological_space M₂] [add_comm_group M₂]
[module R M] [module R M₂]
extends linear_map R M M₂ :=
(cont : continuous to_fun)
notation M ` →L[`:25 R `] ` M₂ := continuous_linear_map R M M₂
/-- Continuous linear equivalences between modules. We only put the type classes that are necessary
for the definition, although in applications `M` and `M₂` will be topological modules over the
topological ring `R`. -/
@[nolint has_inhabited_instance]
structure continuous_linear_equiv
(R : Type*) [ring R]
(M : Type*) [topological_space M] [add_comm_group M]
(M₂ : Type*) [topological_space M₂] [add_comm_group M₂]
[module R M] [module R M₂]
extends linear_equiv R M M₂ :=
(continuous_to_fun : continuous to_fun)
(continuous_inv_fun : continuous inv_fun)
notation M ` ≃L[`:50 R `] ` M₂ := continuous_linear_equiv R M M₂
namespace continuous_linear_map
section general_ring
/- Properties that hold for non-necessarily commutative rings. -/
variables
{R : Type*} [ring R]
{M : Type*} [topological_space M] [add_comm_group M]
{M₂ : Type*} [topological_space M₂] [add_comm_group M₂]
{M₃ : Type*} [topological_space M₃] [add_comm_group M₃]
{M₄ : Type*} [topological_space M₄] [add_comm_group M₄]
[module R M] [module R M₂] [module R M₃] [module R M₄]
/-- Coerce continuous linear maps to linear maps. -/
instance : has_coe (M →L[R] M₂) (M →ₗ[R] M₂) := ⟨to_linear_map⟩
/-- Coerce continuous linear maps to functions. -/
-- see Note [function coercion]
instance to_fun : has_coe_to_fun $ M →L[R] M₂ := ⟨λ _, M → M₂, λ f, f⟩
protected lemma continuous (f : M →L[R] M₂) : continuous f := f.2
@[ext] theorem ext {f g : M →L[R] M₂} (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
by cases f; cases g; congr' 1; ext x; apply h
theorem ext_iff {f g : M →L[R] M₂} : f = g ↔ ∀ x, f x = g x :=
⟨λ h x, by rw h, by ext⟩
variables (c : R) (f g : M →L[R] M₂) (h : M₂ →L[R] M₃) (x y z : M)
-- make some straightforward lemmas available to `simp`.
@[simp] lemma map_zero : f (0 : M) = 0 := (to_linear_map _).map_zero
@[simp] lemma map_add : f (x + y) = f x + f y := (to_linear_map _).map_add _ _
@[simp] lemma map_sub : f (x - y) = f x - f y := (to_linear_map _).map_sub _ _
@[simp] lemma map_smul : f (c • x) = c • f x := (to_linear_map _).map_smul _ _
@[simp] lemma map_neg : f (-x) = - (f x) := (to_linear_map _).map_neg _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_coe : ((f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) : (M → M₂)) = (f : M → M₂) := rfl
/-- The continuous map that is constantly zero. -/
instance: has_zero (M →L[R] M₂) := ⟨⟨0, continuous_const⟩⟩
instance : inhabited (M →L[R] M₂) := ⟨0⟩
@[simp] lemma zero_apply : (0 : M →L[R] M₂) x = 0 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : ((0 : M →L[R] M₂) : M →ₗ[R] M₂) = 0 := rfl
/- no simp attribute on the next line as simp does not always simplify `0 x` to `0`
when `0` is the zero function, while it does for the zero continuous linear map,
and this is the most important property we care about. -/
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_zero' : ((0 : M →L[R] M₂) : M → M₂) = 0 := rfl
section
variables (R M)
/-- the identity map as a continuous linear map. -/
def id : M →L[R] M :=
⟨linear_map.id, continuous_id⟩
end
instance : has_one (M →L[R] M) := ⟨id R M⟩
lemma id_apply : id R M x = x := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_id : (id R M : M →ₗ[R] M) = linear_map.id := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_id' : (id R M : M → M) = _root_.id := rfl
@[simp] lemma one_apply : (1 : M →L[R] M) x = x := rfl
section add
variables [topological_add_group M₂]
instance : has_add (M →L[R] M₂) :=
⟨λ f g, ⟨f + g, f.2.add g.2⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma add_apply : (f + g) x = f x + g x := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_add : (((f + g) : M →L[R] M₂) : M →ₗ[R] M₂) = (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) + g := rfl
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_add' : (((f + g) : M →L[R] M₂) : M → M₂) = (f : M → M₂) + g := rfl
instance : has_neg (M →L[R] M₂) := ⟨λ f, ⟨-f, f.2.neg⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma neg_apply : (-f) x = - (f x) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_neg : (((-f) : M →L[R] M₂) : M →ₗ[R] M₂) = -(f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) := rfl
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_neg' : (((-f) : M →L[R] M₂) : M → M₂) = -(f : M → M₂) := rfl
instance : add_comm_group (M →L[R] M₂) :=
by { refine {zero := 0, add := (+), neg := has_neg.neg, ..}; intros; ext;
apply_rules [zero_add, add_assoc, add_zero, add_left_neg, add_comm] }
lemma sub_apply (x : M) : (f - g) x = f x - g x := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_sub : (((f - g) : M →L[R] M₂) : M →ₗ[R] M₂) = (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) - g := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_sub' : (((f - g) : M →L[R] M₂) : M → M₂) = (f : M → M₂) - g := rfl
lemma sum_apply {ι : Type*} (t : finset ι) (f : ι → M →L[R] M₂) (b : M) :
t.sum f b = t.sum (λd, f d b) :=
begin
haveI : is_add_group_hom (λ (g : M →L[R] M₂), g b) :=
{ map_add := λ f g, continuous_linear_map.add_apply f g b },
exact (finset.sum_hom t (λ g : M →L[R] M₂, g b)).symm
end
end add
@[simp] lemma sub_apply' (x : M) : ((f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) - g) x = f x - g x := rfl
/-- Composition of bounded linear maps. -/
def comp (g : M₂ →L[R] M₃) (f : M →L[R] M₂) : M →L[R] M₃ :=
⟨linear_map.comp g.to_linear_map f.to_linear_map, g.2.comp f.2⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_comp : ((h.comp f) : (M →ₗ[R] M₃)) = (h : M₂ →ₗ[R] M₃).comp f := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_comp' : ((h.comp f) : (M → M₃)) = (h : M₂ → M₃) ∘ f := rfl
@[simp] theorem comp_id : f.comp (id R M) = f :=
ext $ λ x, rfl
@[simp] theorem id_comp : (id R M₂).comp f = f :=
ext $ λ x, rfl
@[simp] theorem comp_zero : f.comp (0 : M₃ →L[R] M) = 0 :=
by { ext, simp }
@[simp] theorem zero_comp : (0 : M₂ →L[R] M₃).comp f = 0 :=
by { ext, simp }
@[simp] lemma comp_add [topological_add_group M₂] [topological_add_group M₃]
(g : M₂ →L[R] M₃) (f₁ f₂ : M →L[R] M₂) :
g.comp (f₁ + f₂) = g.comp f₁ + g.comp f₂ :=
by { ext, simp }
@[simp] lemma add_comp [topological_add_group M₃]
(g₁ g₂ : M₂ →L[R] M₃) (f : M →L[R] M₂) :
(g₁ + g₂).comp f = g₁.comp f + g₂.comp f :=
by { ext, simp }
theorem comp_assoc (h : M₃ →L[R] M₄) (g : M₂ →L[R] M₃) (f : M →L[R] M₂) :
(h.comp g).comp f = h.comp (g.comp f) :=
rfl
instance : has_mul (M →L[R] M) := ⟨comp⟩
lemma mul_def (f g : M →L[R] M) : f * g = f.comp g := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_mul (f g : M →L[R] M) : ⇑(f * g) = f ∘ g := rfl
lemma mul_apply (f g : M →L[R] M) (x : M) : (f * g) x = f (g x) := rfl
instance [topological_add_group M] : ring (M →L[R] M) :=
{ mul := (*),
one := 1,
mul_one := λ _, ext $ λ _, rfl,
one_mul := λ _, ext $ λ _, rfl,
mul_assoc := λ _ _ _, ext $ λ _, rfl,
left_distrib := λ _ _ _, ext $ λ _, map_add _ _ _,
right_distrib := λ _ _ _, ext $ λ _, linear_map.add_apply _ _ _,
..continuous_linear_map.add_comm_group }
/-- The cartesian product of two bounded linear maps, as a bounded linear map. -/
protected def prod (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M →L[R] M₃) : M →L[R] (M₂ × M₃) :=
{ cont := f₁.2.prod_mk f₂.2,
..f₁.to_linear_map.prod f₂.to_linear_map }
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_prod (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M →L[R] M₃) :
(f₁.prod f₂ : M →ₗ[R] M₂ × M₃) = linear_map.prod f₁ f₂ :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma prod_apply (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M →L[R] M₃) (x : M) :
f₁.prod f₂ x = (f₁ x, f₂ x) :=
rfl
/-- Kernel of a continuous linear map. -/
def ker (f : M →L[R] M₂) : submodule R M := (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂).ker
@[norm_cast] lemma ker_coe : (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂).ker = f.ker := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_ker {f : M →L[R] M₂} {x} : x ∈ f.ker ↔ f x = 0 := linear_map.mem_ker
lemma is_closed_ker [t1_space M₂] : is_closed (f.ker : set M) :=
continuous_iff_is_closed.1 f.cont _ is_closed_singleton
@[simp] lemma apply_ker (x : f.ker) : f x = 0 := mem_ker.1 x.2
/-- Range of a continuous linear map. -/
def range (f : M →L[R] M₂) : submodule R M₂ := (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂).range
lemma range_coe : (f.range : set M₂) = set.range f := linear_map.range_coe _
lemma mem_range {f : M →L[R] M₂} {y} : y ∈ f.range ↔ ∃ x, f x = y := linear_map.mem_range
/-- Restrict codomain of a continuous linear map. -/
def cod_restrict (f : M →L[R] M₂) (p : submodule R M₂) (h : ∀ x, f x ∈ p) :
M →L[R] p :=
{ cont := continuous_subtype_mk h f.continuous,
to_linear_map := (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂).cod_restrict p h}
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_cod_restrict (f : M →L[R] M₂) (p : submodule R M₂) (h : ∀ x, f x ∈ p) :
(f.cod_restrict p h : M →ₗ[R] p) = (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂).cod_restrict p h :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_cod_restrict_apply (f : M →L[R] M₂) (p : submodule R M₂) (h : ∀ x, f x ∈ p) (x) :
(f.cod_restrict p h x : M₂) = f x :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma ker_cod_restrict (f : M →L[R] M₂) (p : submodule R M₂) (h : ∀ x, f x ∈ p) :
ker (f.cod_restrict p h) = ker f :=
(f : M →ₗ[R] M₂).ker_cod_restrict p h
/-- Embedding of a submodule into the ambient space as a continuous linear map. -/
def subtype_val (p : submodule R M) : p →L[R] M :=
{ cont := continuous_subtype_val,
to_linear_map := p.subtype }
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_subtype_val (p : submodule R M) :
(subtype_val p : p →ₗ[R] M) = p.subtype :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma subtype_val_apply (p : submodule R M) (x : p) :
(subtype_val p : p → M) x = x :=
rfl
variables (R M M₂)
/-- `prod.fst` as a `continuous_linear_map`. -/
def fst : M × M₂ →L[R] M :=
{ cont := continuous_fst, to_linear_map := linear_map.fst R M M₂ }
/-- `prod.snd` as a `continuous_linear_map`. -/
def snd : M × M₂ →L[R] M₂ :=
{ cont := continuous_snd, to_linear_map := linear_map.snd R M M₂ }
variables {R M M₂}
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_fst : (fst R M M₂ : M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M) = linear_map.fst R M M₂ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_fst' : (fst R M M₂ : M × M₂ → M) = prod.fst := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_snd : (snd R M M₂ : M × M₂ →ₗ[R] M₂) = linear_map.snd R M M₂ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_snd' : (snd R M M₂ : M × M₂ → M₂) = prod.snd := rfl
/-- `prod.map` of two continuous linear maps. -/
def prod_map (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₃ →L[R] M₄) : (M × M₃) →L[R] (M₂ × M₄) :=
(f₁.comp (fst R M M₃)).prod (f₂.comp (snd R M M₃))
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_prod_map (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₃ →L[R] M₄) :
(f₁.prod_map f₂ : (M × M₃) →ₗ[R] (M₂ × M₄)) = ((f₁ : M →ₗ[R] M₂).prod_map (f₂ : M₃ →ₗ[R] M₄)) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_prod_map' (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₃ →L[R] M₄) :
⇑(f₁.prod_map f₂) = prod.map f₁ f₂ :=
rfl
/-- The continuous linear map given by `(x, y) ↦ f₁ x + f₂ y`. -/
def coprod [topological_add_monoid M₃] (f₁ : M →L[R] M₃) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M₃) :
(M × M₂) →L[R] M₃ :=
⟨linear_map.coprod f₁ f₂, (f₁.cont.comp continuous_fst).add (f₂.cont.comp continuous_snd)⟩
@[norm_cast, simp] lemma coe_coprod [topological_add_monoid M₃]
(f₁ : M →L[R] M₃) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M₃) :
(f₁.coprod f₂ : (M × M₂) →ₗ[R] M₃) = linear_map.coprod f₁ f₂ :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma coprod_apply [topological_add_monoid M₃] (f₁ : M →L[R] M₃) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M₃) (x) :
f₁.coprod f₂ x = f₁ x.1 + f₂ x.2 := rfl
/-- Given a right inverse `f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M` to `f₁ : M →L[R] M₂`,
`proj_ker_of_right_inverse f₁ f₂ h` is the projection `M →L[R] f₁.ker` along `f₂.range`. -/
def proj_ker_of_right_inverse [topological_add_group M] (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M)
(h : function.right_inverse f₂ f₁) :
M →L[R] f₁.ker :=
(id R M - f₂.comp f₁).cod_restrict f₁.ker $ λ x, by simp [h (f₁ x)]
@[simp] lemma coe_proj_ker_of_right_inverse_apply [topological_add_group M]
(f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M) (h : function.right_inverse f₂ f₁) (x : M) :
(f₁.proj_ker_of_right_inverse f₂ h x : M) = x - f₂ (f₁ x) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma proj_ker_of_right_inverse_apply_idem [topological_add_group M]
(f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M) (h : function.right_inverse f₂ f₁) (x : f₁.ker) :
f₁.proj_ker_of_right_inverse f₂ h x = x :=
subtype.coe_ext.2 $ by simp
@[simp] lemma proj_ker_of_right_inverse_comp_inv [topological_add_group M]
(f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M) (h : function.right_inverse f₂ f₁) (y : M₂) :
f₁.proj_ker_of_right_inverse f₂ h (f₂ y) = 0 :=
subtype.coe_ext.2 $ by simp [h y]
variables [topological_space R] [topological_module R M₂]
/-- The linear map `λ x, c x • f`. Associates to a scalar-valued linear map and an element of
`M₂` the `M₂`-valued linear map obtained by multiplying the two (a.k.a. tensoring by `M₂`) -/
def smul_right (c : M →L[R] R) (f : M₂) : M →L[R] M₂ :=
{ cont := c.2.smul continuous_const,
..c.to_linear_map.smul_right f }
@[simp]
lemma smul_right_apply {c : M →L[R] R} {f : M₂} {x : M} :
(smul_right c f : M → M₂) x = (c : M → R) x • f :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma smul_right_one_one (c : R →L[R] M₂) : smul_right 1 ((c : R → M₂) 1) = c :=
by ext; simp [-continuous_linear_map.map_smul, (continuous_linear_map.map_smul _ _ _).symm]
@[simp]
lemma smul_right_one_eq_iff {f f' : M₂} :
smul_right (1 : R →L[R] R) f = smul_right 1 f' ↔ f = f' :=
⟨λ h, have (smul_right (1 : R →L[R] R) f : R → M₂) 1 = (smul_right (1 : R →L[R] R) f' : R → M₂) 1,
by rw h,
by simp at this; assumption,
by cc⟩
lemma smul_right_comp [topological_module R R] {x : M₂} {c : R} :
(smul_right 1 x : R →L[R] M₂).comp (smul_right 1 c : R →L[R] R) = smul_right 1 (c • x) :=
by { ext, simp [mul_smul] }
lemma smul_right_one_pow [topological_add_group R] [topological_module R R] (c : R) (n : ℕ) :
(smul_right 1 c : R →L[R] R)^n = smul_right 1 (c^n) :=
begin
induction n with n ihn,
{ ext, simp },
{ rw [pow_succ, ihn, mul_def, smul_right_comp, smul_eq_mul, pow_succ'] }
end
end general_ring
section comm_ring
variables
{R : Type*} [comm_ring R] [topological_space R]
{M : Type*} [topological_space M] [add_comm_group M]
{M₂ : Type*} [topological_space M₂] [add_comm_group M₂]
{M₃ : Type*} [topological_space M₃] [add_comm_group M₃]
[module R M] [module R M₂] [module R M₃] [topological_module R M₃]
instance : has_scalar R (M →L[R] M₃) :=
⟨λ c f, ⟨c • f, continuous_const.smul f.2⟩⟩
variables (c : R) (h : M₂ →L[R] M₃) (f g : M →L[R] M₂) (x y z : M)
@[simp] lemma smul_comp : (c • h).comp f = c • (h.comp f) := rfl
variable [topological_module R M₂]
@[simp] lemma smul_apply : (c • f) x = c • (f x) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_apply : (((c • f) : M →L[R] M₂) : M →ₗ[R] M₂) = c • (f : M →ₗ[R] M₂) := rfl
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_apply' : (((c • f) : M →L[R] M₂) : M → M₂) = c • (f : M → M₂) := rfl
@[simp] lemma comp_smul : h.comp (c • f) = c • (h.comp f) := by { ext, simp }
variable [topological_add_group M₂]
instance : module R (M →L[R] M₂) :=
{ smul_zero := λ _, ext $ λ _, smul_zero _,
zero_smul := λ _, ext $ λ _, zero_smul _ _,
one_smul := λ _, ext $ λ _, one_smul _ _,
mul_smul := λ _ _ _, ext $ λ _, mul_smul _ _ _,
add_smul := λ _ _ _, ext $ λ _, add_smul _ _ _,
smul_add := λ _ _ _, ext $ λ _, smul_add _ _ _ }
instance : algebra R (M₂ →L[R] M₂) :=
algebra.of_semimodule' (λ c f, ext $ λ x, rfl) (λ c f, ext $ λ x, f.map_smul c x)
end comm_ring
end continuous_linear_map
namespace continuous_linear_equiv
variables {R : Type*} [ring R]
{M : Type*} [topological_space M] [add_comm_group M]
{M₂ : Type*} [topological_space M₂] [add_comm_group M₂]
{M₃ : Type*} [topological_space M₃] [add_comm_group M₃]
{M₄ : Type*} [topological_space M₄] [add_comm_group M₄]
[module R M] [module R M₂] [module R M₃] [module R M₄]
/-- A continuous linear equivalence induces a continuous linear map. -/
def to_continuous_linear_map (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : M →L[R] M₂ :=
{ cont := e.continuous_to_fun,
..e.to_linear_equiv.to_linear_map }
/-- Coerce continuous linear equivs to continuous linear maps. -/
instance : has_coe (M ≃L[R] M₂) (M →L[R] M₂) := ⟨to_continuous_linear_map⟩
/-- Coerce continuous linear equivs to maps. -/
-- see Note [function coercion]
instance : has_coe_to_fun (M ≃L[R] M₂) := ⟨λ _, M → M₂, λ f, f⟩
@[simp] theorem coe_def_rev (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : e.to_continuous_linear_map = e := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_apply (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (b : M) : (e : M →L[R] M₂) b = e b := rfl
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_coe (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : ((e : M →L[R] M₂) : M → M₂) = e := rfl
@[ext] lemma ext {f g : M ≃L[R] M₂} (h : (f : M → M₂) = g) : f = g :=
begin
cases f; cases g,
simp only [],
ext x,
induction h,
refl
end
/-- A continuous linear equivalence induces a homeomorphism. -/
def to_homeomorph (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : M ≃ₜ M₂ := { ..e }
-- Make some straightforward lemmas available to `simp`.
@[simp] lemma map_zero (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : e (0 : M) = 0 := (e : M →L[R] M₂).map_zero
@[simp] lemma map_add (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (x y : M) : e (x + y) = e x + e y :=
(e : M →L[R] M₂).map_add x y
@[simp] lemma map_sub (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (x y : M) : e (x - y) = e x - e y :=
(e : M →L[R] M₂).map_sub x y
@[simp] lemma map_smul (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (c : R) (x : M) : e (c • x) = c • (e x) :=
(e : M →L[R] M₂).map_smul c x
@[simp] lemma map_neg (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (x : M) : e (-x) = -e x := (e : M →L[R] M₂).map_neg x
@[simp] lemma map_eq_zero_iff (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) {x : M} : e x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
e.to_linear_equiv.map_eq_zero_iff
protected lemma continuous (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : continuous (e : M → M₂) :=
e.continuous_to_fun
protected lemma continuous_on (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) {s : set M} : continuous_on (e : M → M₂) s :=
e.continuous.continuous_on
protected lemma continuous_at (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) {x : M} : continuous_at (e : M → M₂) x :=
e.continuous.continuous_at
protected lemma continuous_within_at (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) {s : set M} {x : M} :
continuous_within_at (e : M → M₂) s x :=
e.continuous.continuous_within_at
lemma comp_continuous_on_iff
{α : Type*} [topological_space α] (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (f : α → M) (s : set α) :
continuous_on (e ∘ f) s ↔ continuous_on f s :=
e.to_homeomorph.comp_continuous_on_iff _ _
lemma comp_continuous_iff
{α : Type*} [topological_space α] (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (f : α → M) :
continuous (e ∘ f) ↔ continuous f :=
e.to_homeomorph.comp_continuous_iff _
/-- An extensionality lemma for `R ≃L[R] M`. -/
lemma ext₁ [topological_space R] {f g : R ≃L[R] M} (h : f 1 = g 1) : f = g :=
ext $ funext $ λ x, mul_one x ▸ by rw [← smul_eq_mul, map_smul, h, map_smul]
section
variables (R M)
/-- The identity map as a continuous linear equivalence. -/
@[refl] protected def refl : M ≃L[R] M :=
{ continuous_to_fun := continuous_id,
continuous_inv_fun := continuous_id,
.. linear_equiv.refl R M }
end
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_refl :
(continuous_linear_equiv.refl R M : M →L[R] M) = continuous_linear_map.id R M := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_refl' :
(continuous_linear_equiv.refl R M : M → M) = id := rfl
/-- The inverse of a continuous linear equivalence as a continuous linear equivalence-/
@[symm] protected def symm (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : M₂ ≃L[R] M :=
{ continuous_to_fun := e.continuous_inv_fun,
continuous_inv_fun := e.continuous_to_fun,
.. e.to_linear_equiv.symm }
@[simp] lemma symm_to_linear_equiv (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) :
e.symm.to_linear_equiv = e.to_linear_equiv.symm :=
by { ext, refl }
/-- The composition of two continuous linear equivalences as a continuous linear equivalence. -/
@[trans] protected def trans (e₁ : M ≃L[R] M₂) (e₂ : M₂ ≃L[R] M₃) : M ≃L[R] M₃ :=
{ continuous_to_fun := e₂.continuous_to_fun.comp e₁.continuous_to_fun,
continuous_inv_fun := e₁.continuous_inv_fun.comp e₂.continuous_inv_fun,
.. e₁.to_linear_equiv.trans e₂.to_linear_equiv }
@[simp] lemma trans_to_linear_equiv (e₁ : M ≃L[R] M₂) (e₂ : M₂ ≃L[R] M₃) :
(e₁.trans e₂).to_linear_equiv = e₁.to_linear_equiv.trans e₂.to_linear_equiv :=
by { ext, refl }
/-- Product of two continuous linear equivalences. The map comes from `equiv.prod_congr`. -/
def prod (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (e' : M₃ ≃L[R] M₄) : (M × M₃) ≃L[R] (M₂ × M₄) :=
{ continuous_to_fun := e.continuous_to_fun.prod_map e'.continuous_to_fun,
continuous_inv_fun := e.continuous_inv_fun.prod_map e'.continuous_inv_fun,
.. e.to_linear_equiv.prod e'.to_linear_equiv }
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma prod_apply (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (e' : M₃ ≃L[R] M₄) (x) :
e.prod e' x = (e x.1, e' x.2) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_prod (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (e' : M₃ ≃L[R] M₄) :
(e.prod e' : (M × M₃) →L[R] (M₂ × M₄)) = (e : M →L[R] M₂).prod_map (e' : M₃ →L[R] M₄) :=
rfl
variables [topological_add_group M₄]
/-- Equivalence given by a block lower diagonal matrix. `e` and `e'` are diagonal square blocks,
and `f` is a rectangular block below the diagonal. -/
def skew_prod (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (e' : M₃ ≃L[R] M₄) (f : M →L[R] M₄) :
(M × M₃) ≃L[R] M₂ × M₄ :=
{ continuous_to_fun := (e.continuous_to_fun.comp continuous_fst).prod_mk
((e'.continuous_to_fun.comp continuous_snd).add $ f.continuous.comp continuous_fst),
continuous_inv_fun := (e.continuous_inv_fun.comp continuous_fst).prod_mk
(e'.continuous_inv_fun.comp $ continuous_snd.sub $ f.continuous.comp $
e.continuous_inv_fun.comp continuous_fst),
.. e.to_linear_equiv.skew_prod e'.to_linear_equiv ↑f }
@[simp] lemma skew_prod_apply (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (e' : M₃ ≃L[R] M₄) (f : M →L[R] M₄) (x) :
e.skew_prod e' f x = (e x.1, e' x.2 + f x.1) := rfl
@[simp] lemma skew_prod_symm_apply (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (e' : M₃ ≃L[R] M₄) (f : M →L[R] M₄) (x) :
(e.skew_prod e' f).symm x = (e.symm x.1, e'.symm (x.2 - f (e.symm x.1))) := rfl
theorem bijective (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : function.bijective e := e.to_linear_equiv.to_equiv.bijective
theorem injective (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : function.injective e := e.to_linear_equiv.to_equiv.injective
theorem surjective (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : function.surjective e := e.to_linear_equiv.to_equiv.surjective
@[simp] theorem apply_symm_apply (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (c : M₂) : e (e.symm c) = c := e.1.6 c
@[simp] theorem symm_apply_apply (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (b : M) : e.symm (e b) = b := e.1.5 b
@[simp] theorem coe_comp_coe_symm (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) :
(e : M →L[R] M₂).comp (e.symm : M₂ →L[R] M) = continuous_linear_map.id R M₂ :=
continuous_linear_map.ext e.apply_symm_apply
@[simp] theorem coe_symm_comp_coe (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) :
(e.symm : M₂ →L[R] M).comp (e : M →L[R] M₂) = continuous_linear_map.id R M :=
continuous_linear_map.ext e.symm_apply_apply
lemma symm_comp_self (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) :
(e.symm : M₂ → M) ∘ (e : M → M₂) = id :=
by{ ext x, exact symm_apply_apply e x }
lemma self_comp_symm (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) :
(e : M → M₂) ∘ (e.symm : M₂ → M) = id :=
by{ ext x, exact apply_symm_apply e x }
@[simp] lemma symm_comp_self' (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) :
((e.symm : M₂ →L[R] M) : M₂ → M) ∘ ((e : M →L[R] M₂) : M → M₂) = id :=
symm_comp_self e
@[simp] lemma self_comp_symm' (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) :
((e : M →L[R] M₂) : M → M₂) ∘ ((e.symm : M₂ →L[R] M) : M₂ → M) = id :=
self_comp_symm e
@[simp] theorem symm_symm (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) : e.symm.symm = e :=
by { ext x, refl }
theorem symm_symm_apply (e : M ≃L[R] M₂) (x : M) : e.symm.symm x = e x :=
rfl
/-- Create a `continuous_linear_equiv` from two `continuous_linear_map`s that are
inverse of each other. -/
def equiv_of_inverse (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M) (h₁ : function.left_inverse f₂ f₁)
(h₂ : function.right_inverse f₂ f₁) :
M ≃L[R] M₂ :=
{ to_fun := f₁,
continuous_to_fun := f₁.continuous,
inv_fun := f₂,
continuous_inv_fun := f₂.continuous,
left_inv := h₁,
right_inv := h₂,
.. f₁ }
@[simp] lemma equiv_of_inverse_apply (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ h₁ h₂ x) :
equiv_of_inverse f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂ x = f₁ x :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma symm_equiv_of_inverse (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ h₁ h₂) :
(equiv_of_inverse f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂).symm = equiv_of_inverse f₂ f₁ h₂ h₁ :=
rfl
section
variables (R) [topological_space R] [topological_module R R]
/-- Continuous linear equivalences `R ≃L[R] R` are enumerated by `units R`. -/
def units_equiv_aut : units R ≃ (R ≃L[R] R) :=
{ to_fun := λ u, equiv_of_inverse
(continuous_linear_map.smul_right 1 ↑u)
(continuous_linear_map.smul_right 1 ↑u⁻¹)
(λ x, by simp) (λ x, by simp),
inv_fun := λ e, ⟨e 1, e.symm 1,
by rw [← smul_eq_mul, ← map_smul, smul_eq_mul, mul_one, symm_apply_apply],
by rw [← smul_eq_mul, ← map_smul, smul_eq_mul, mul_one, apply_symm_apply]⟩,
left_inv := λ u, units.ext $ by simp,
right_inv := λ e, ext₁ $ by simp }
variable {R}
@[simp] lemma units_equiv_aut_apply (u : units R) (x : R) : units_equiv_aut R u x = x * u := rfl
@[simp] lemma units_equiv_aut_apply_symm (u : units R) (x : R) :
(units_equiv_aut R u).symm x = x * ↑u⁻¹ := rfl
@[simp] lemma units_equiv_aut_symm_apply (e : R ≃L[R] R) :
↑((units_equiv_aut R).symm e) = e 1 :=
rfl
end
variables [topological_add_group M]
open continuous_linear_map (id fst snd subtype_val mem_ker)
/-- A pair of continuous linear maps such that `f₁ ∘ f₂ = id` generates a continuous
linear equivalence `e` between `M` and `M₂ × f₁.ker` such that `(e x).2 = x` for `x ∈ f₁.ker`,
`(e x).1 = f₁ x`, and `(e (f₂ y)).2 = 0`. The map is given by `e x = (f₁ x, x - f₂ (f₁ x))`. -/
def equiv_of_right_inverse (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M) (h : function.right_inverse f₂ f₁) :
M ≃L[R] M₂ × f₁.ker :=
equiv_of_inverse (f₁.prod (f₁.proj_ker_of_right_inverse f₂ h)) (f₂.coprod (subtype_val f₁.ker))
(λ x, by simp)
(λ ⟨x, y⟩, by simp [h x])
@[simp] lemma fst_equiv_of_right_inverse (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M)
(h : function.right_inverse f₂ f₁) (x : M) :
(equiv_of_right_inverse f₁ f₂ h x).1 = f₁ x := rfl
@[simp] lemma snd_equiv_of_right_inverse (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M)
(h : function.right_inverse f₂ f₁) (x : M) :
((equiv_of_right_inverse f₁ f₂ h x).2 : M) = x - f₂ (f₁ x) := rfl
@[simp] lemma equiv_of_right_inverse_symm_apply (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M)
(h : function.right_inverse f₂ f₁) (y : M₂ × f₁.ker) :
(equiv_of_right_inverse f₁ f₂ h).symm y = f₂ y.1 + y.2 := rfl
end continuous_linear_equiv
namespace submodule
variables
{R : Type*} [ring R]
{M : Type*} [topological_space M] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
{M₂ : Type*} [topological_space M₂] [add_comm_group M₂] [module R M₂]
open continuous_linear_map
/-- A submodule `p` is called *complemented* if there exists a continuous projection `M →ₗ[R] p`. -/
def closed_complemented (p : submodule R M) : Prop := ∃ f : M →L[R] p, ∀ x : p, f x = x
lemma closed_complemented.has_closed_complement {p : submodule R M} [t1_space p]
(h : closed_complemented p) :
∃ (q : submodule R M) (hq : is_closed (q : set M)), is_compl p q :=
exists.elim h $ λ f hf, ⟨f.ker, f.is_closed_ker, (f : M →ₗ[R] p).is_compl_of_proj hf⟩
protected lemma closed_complemented.is_closed [topological_add_group M] [t1_space M]
{p : submodule R M} (h : closed_complemented p) :
is_closed (p : set M) :=
begin
rcases h with ⟨f, hf⟩,
have : ker (id R M - (subtype_val p).comp f) = p := (f : M →ₗ[R] p).ker_id_sub_eq_of_proj hf,
exact this ▸ (is_closed_ker _)
end
@[simp] lemma closed_complemented_bot : closed_complemented (⊥ : submodule R M) :=
⟨0, λ x, by simp only [zero_apply, eq_zero_of_bot_submodule x]⟩
@[simp] lemma closed_complemented_top : closed_complemented (⊤ : submodule R M) :=
⟨(id R M).cod_restrict ⊤ (λ x, trivial), λ x, subtype.coe_ext.2 $ by simp⟩
end submodule
lemma continuous_linear_map.closed_complemented_ker_of_right_inverse {R : Type*} [ring R]
{M : Type*} [topological_space M] [add_comm_group M]
{M₂ : Type*} [topological_space M₂] [add_comm_group M₂] [module R M] [module R M₂]
[topological_add_group M] (f₁ : M →L[R] M₂) (f₂ : M₂ →L[R] M)
(h : function.right_inverse f₂ f₁) :
f₁.ker.closed_complemented :=
⟨f₁.proj_ker_of_right_inverse f₂ h, f₁.proj_ker_of_right_inverse_apply_idem f₂ h⟩
|
89691e0c13b9177485cdcefeba57a3eec4e0870a | 10834b3de906c60d1989336d7506a00ee5e52c08 | /library/init/meta/simp_tactic.lean | 2aeaeff8a72d43f0cc367e5ad5f05392a74d53e1 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Jack-Pumpkinhead/lean | 16657b5ad7f5316f007842fa2426b7f91212eae8 | 81cabd7b5a8f789633639f5fba64b45d31e37259 | refs/heads/master | 1,621,358,983,310 | 1,585,070,616,000 | 1,585,070,616,000 | 251,335,905 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,585,579,683,000 | 1,585,579,682,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 26,857 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import init.meta.tactic init.meta.attribute init.meta.constructor_tactic
import init.meta.relation_tactics init.meta.occurrences
import init.data.option.basic
open tactic
def simp.default_max_steps := 10000000
/-- Prefix the given `attr_name` with `"simp_attr"`. -/
meta constant mk_simp_attr_decl_name (attr_name : name) : name
/-- Simp lemmas are used by the "simplifier" family of tactics.
`simp_lemmas` is essentially a pair of tables `rb_map (expr_type × name) (priority_list simp_lemma)`.
One of the tables is for congruences and one is for everything else.
An individual simp lemma is:
- A kind which can be `Refl`, `Simp` or `Congr`.
- A pair of `expr`s `l ~> r`. The rb map is indexed by the name of `get_app_fn(l)`.
- A proof that `l = r` or `l ↔ r`.
- A list of the metavariables that must be filled before the proof can be applied.
- A priority number
-/
meta constant simp_lemmas : Type
/-- Make a new table of simp lemmas -/
meta constant simp_lemmas.mk : simp_lemmas
/-- Merge the simp_lemma tables. -/
meta constant simp_lemmas.join : simp_lemmas → simp_lemmas → simp_lemmas
/-- Remove the given lemmas from the table. Use the names of the lemmas. -/
meta constant simp_lemmas.erase : simp_lemmas → list name → simp_lemmas
/-- Makes the default simp_lemmas table which is composed of all lemmas tagged with `simp`. -/
meta constant simp_lemmas.mk_default : tactic simp_lemmas
/-- Add a simplification lemma by an expression `p`. Some conditions on `p` must hold for it to be added, see list below.
If your lemma is not being added, you can see the reasons by setting `set_option trace.simp_lemmas true`.
- `p` must have the type `Π (h₁ : _) ... (hₙ : _), LHS ~ RHS` for some reflexive, transitive relation (usually `=`).
- Any of the hypotheses `hᵢ` should either be present in `LHS` or otherwise a `Prop` or a typeclass instance.
- `LHS` should not occur within `RHS`.
- `LHS` should not occur within a hypothesis `hᵢ`.
-/
meta constant simp_lemmas.add (s : simp_lemmas) (e : expr) (symm : bool := false) : tactic simp_lemmas
/-- Add a simplification lemma by it's declaration name. See `simp_lemmas.add` for more information.-/
meta constant simp_lemmas.add_simp (s : simp_lemmas) (id : name) (symm : bool := false) : tactic simp_lemmas
/-- Adds a congruence simp lemma to simp_lemmas.
A congruence simp lemma is a lemma that breaks the simplification down into separate problems.
For example, to simplify `a ∧ b` to `c ∧ d`, we should try to simp `a` to `c` and `b` to `d`.
For examples of congruence simp lemmas look for lemmas with the `@[congr]` attribute.
```lean
lemma if_simp_congr ... (h_c : b ↔ c) (h_t : x = u) (h_e : y = v) : ite b x y = ite c u v := ...
lemma imp_congr_right (h : a → (b ↔ c)) : (a → b) ↔ (a → c) := ...
lemma and_congr (h₁ : a ↔ c) (h₂ : b ↔ d) : (a ∧ b) ↔ (c ∧ d) := ...
```
-/
meta constant simp_lemmas.add_congr : simp_lemmas → name → tactic simp_lemmas
/-- Add expressions to a set of simp lemmas using `simp_lemmas.add`.
This is the new version of `simp_lemmas.append`,
which also allows you to set the `symm` flag.
-/
meta def simp_lemmas.append_with_symm (s : simp_lemmas) (hs : list (expr × bool)) :
tactic simp_lemmas :=
hs.mfoldl (λ s h, simp_lemmas.add s h.fst h.snd) s
/-- Add expressions to a set of simp lemmas using `simp_lemmas.add`.
This is the backwards-compatibility version of `simp_lemmas.append_with_symm`,
and sets all `symm` flags to `ff`.
-/
meta def simp_lemmas.append (s : simp_lemmas) (hs : list expr) : tactic simp_lemmas :=
hs.mfoldl (λ s h, simp_lemmas.add s h ff) s
/-- `simp_lemmas.rewrite s e prove R` apply a simplification lemma from 's'
- 'e' is the expression to be "simplified"
- 'prove' is used to discharge proof obligations.
- 'r' is the equivalence relation being used (e.g., 'eq', 'iff')
- 'md' is the transparency; how aggresively should the simplifier perform reductions.
Result (new_e, pr) is the new expression 'new_e' and a proof (pr : e R new_e) -/
meta constant simp_lemmas.rewrite (s : simp_lemmas) (e : expr)
(prove : tactic unit := failed) (r : name := `eq) (md := reducible)
: tactic (expr × expr)
meta constant simp_lemmas.rewrites (s : simp_lemmas) (e : expr)
(prove : tactic unit := failed) (r : name := `eq) (md := reducible)
: tactic $ list (expr × expr)
/-- `simp_lemmas.drewrite s e` tries to rewrite 'e' using only refl lemmas in 's' -/
meta constant simp_lemmas.drewrite (s : simp_lemmas) (e : expr) (md := reducible) : tactic expr
meta constant is_valid_simp_lemma_cnst : name → tactic bool
meta constant is_valid_simp_lemma : expr → tactic bool
meta constant simp_lemmas.pp : simp_lemmas → tactic format
meta instance : has_to_tactic_format simp_lemmas :=
⟨simp_lemmas.pp⟩
namespace tactic
/- Remark: `transform` should not change the target. -/
/-- Revert a local constant, change its type using `transform`. -/
meta def revert_and_transform (transform : expr → tactic expr) (h : expr) : tactic unit :=
do num_reverted : ℕ ← revert h,
t ← target,
match t with
| expr.pi n bi d b :=
do h_simp ← transform d,
unsafe_change $ expr.pi n bi h_simp b
| expr.elet n g e f :=
do h_simp ← transform g,
unsafe_change $ expr.elet n h_simp e f
| _ := fail "reverting hypothesis created neither a pi nor an elet expr (unreachable?)"
end,
intron num_reverted
/-- `get_eqn_lemmas_for deps d` returns the automatically generated equational lemmas for definition d.
If deps is tt, then lemmas for automatically generated auxiliary declarations used to define d are also included. -/
meta constant get_eqn_lemmas_for : bool → name → tactic (list name)
structure dsimp_config :=
(md := reducible) -- reduction mode: how aggressively constants are replaced with their definitions.
(max_steps : nat := simp.default_max_steps) -- The maximum number of steps allowed before failing.
(canonize_instances : bool := tt) -- [TODO] docs
(single_pass : bool := ff) -- [TODO] Does this mean that _each_ simp-lemma can only be used once?
(fail_if_unchanged := tt) -- Don't throw if simp didn't do anything.
(eta := tt) -- allow eta-equivalence: `(λ x, F $ x) ↝ F`
(zeta : bool := tt) -- do zeta-reductions: `let x : a := b in c ↝ c[x/b]`.
(beta : bool := tt) -- do beta-reductions: `(λ x, E) $ (y) ↝ E[x/y]`.
(proj : bool := tt) -- reduce projections: `⟨a,b⟩.1 ↝ a` [TODO] I think?
(iota : bool := tt) -- reduce recursors for inductive datatypes: eg `nat.rec_on (succ n) Z R ↝ R n $ nat.rec_on n Z R`
(unfold_reducible := ff) -- if tt, definitions with `reducible` transparency will be unfolded (delta-reduced)
(memoize := tt) -- [TODO] what is being memoised?
end tactic
/-- (Definitional) Simplify the given expression using *only* reflexivity equality lemmas from the given set of lemmas.
The resulting expression is definitionally equal to the input.
The list `u` contains defintions to be delta-reduced, and projections to be reduced.-/
meta constant simp_lemmas.dsimplify (s : simp_lemmas) (u : list name := []) (e : expr) (cfg : tactic.dsimp_config := {}) : tactic expr
namespace tactic
/- Remark: the configuration parameters `cfg.md` and `cfg.eta` are ignored by this tactic. -/
meta constant dsimplify_core
/- The user state type. -/
{α : Type}
/- Initial user data -/
(a : α)
/- (pre a e) is invoked before visiting the children of subterm 'e',
if it succeeds the result (new_a, new_e, flag) where
- 'new_a' is the new value for the user data
- 'new_e' is a new expression that must be definitionally equal to 'e',
- 'flag' if tt 'new_e' children should be visited, and 'post' invoked. -/
(pre : α → expr → tactic (α × expr × bool))
/- (post a e) is invoked after visiting the children of subterm 'e',
The output is similar to (pre a e), but the 'flag' indicates whether
the new expression should be revisited or not. -/
(post : α → expr → tactic (α × expr × bool))
(e : expr)
(cfg : dsimp_config := {})
: tactic (α × expr)
meta def dsimplify
(pre : expr → tactic (expr × bool))
(post : expr → tactic (expr × bool))
: expr → tactic expr :=
λ e, do (a, new_e) ← dsimplify_core ()
(λ u e, do r ← pre e, return (u, r))
(λ u e, do r ← post e, return (u, r)) e,
return new_e
meta def get_simp_lemmas_or_default : option simp_lemmas → tactic simp_lemmas
| none := simp_lemmas.mk_default
| (some s) := return s
meta def dsimp_target (s : option simp_lemmas := none) (u : list name := []) (cfg : dsimp_config := {}) : tactic unit :=
do
s ← get_simp_lemmas_or_default s,
t ← target >>= instantiate_mvars,
s.dsimplify u t cfg >>= unsafe_change
meta def dsimp_hyp (h : expr) (s : option simp_lemmas := none) (u : list name := []) (cfg : dsimp_config := {}) : tactic unit :=
do s ← get_simp_lemmas_or_default s, revert_and_transform (λ e, s.dsimplify u e cfg) h
/- Remark: we use transparency.instances by default to make sure that we
can unfold projections of type classes. Example:
(@has_add.add nat nat.has_add a b)
-/
/-- Tries to unfold `e` if it is a constant or a constant application.
Remark: this is not a recursive procedure. -/
meta constant dunfold_head (e : expr) (md := transparency.instances) : tactic expr
structure dunfold_config extends dsimp_config :=
(md := transparency.instances)
/- Remark: in principle, dunfold can be implemented on top of dsimp. We don't do it for
performance reasons. -/
meta constant dunfold (cs : list name) (e : expr) (cfg : dunfold_config := {}) : tactic expr
meta def dunfold_target (cs : list name) (cfg : dunfold_config := {}) : tactic unit :=
do t ← target, dunfold cs t cfg >>= unsafe_change
meta def dunfold_hyp (cs : list name) (h : expr) (cfg : dunfold_config := {}) : tactic unit :=
revert_and_transform (λ e, dunfold cs e cfg) h
structure delta_config :=
(max_steps := simp.default_max_steps)
(visit_instances := tt)
private meta def is_delta_target (e : expr) (cs : list name) : bool :=
cs.any (λ c,
if e.is_app_of c then tt /- Exact match -/
else let f := e.get_app_fn in
/- f is an auxiliary constant generated when compiling c -/
f.is_constant && f.const_name.is_internal && (f.const_name.get_prefix = c))
/-- Delta reduce the given constant names -/
meta def delta (cs : list name) (e : expr) (cfg : delta_config := {}) : tactic expr :=
let unfold (u : unit) (e : expr) : tactic (unit × expr × bool) := do
guard (is_delta_target e cs),
(expr.const f_name f_lvls) ← return e.get_app_fn,
env ← get_env,
decl ← env.get f_name,
new_f ← decl.instantiate_value_univ_params f_lvls,
new_e ← head_beta (expr.mk_app new_f e.get_app_args),
return (u, new_e, tt)
in do (c, new_e) ← dsimplify_core () (λ c e, failed) unfold e {max_steps := cfg.max_steps, canonize_instances := cfg.visit_instances},
return new_e
meta def delta_target (cs : list name) (cfg : delta_config := {}) : tactic unit :=
do t ← target, delta cs t cfg >>= unsafe_change
meta def delta_hyp (cs : list name) (h : expr) (cfg : delta_config := {}) :tactic unit :=
revert_and_transform (λ e, delta cs e cfg) h
structure unfold_proj_config extends dsimp_config :=
(md := transparency.instances)
/-- If `e` is a projection application, try to unfold it, otherwise fail. -/
meta constant unfold_proj (e : expr) (md := transparency.instances) : tactic expr
meta def unfold_projs (e : expr) (cfg : unfold_proj_config := {}) : tactic expr :=
let unfold (changed : bool) (e : expr) : tactic (bool × expr × bool) := do
new_e ← unfold_proj e cfg.md,
return (tt, new_e, tt)
in do (tt, new_e) ← dsimplify_core ff (λ c e, failed) unfold e cfg.to_dsimp_config | fail "no projections to unfold",
return new_e
meta def unfold_projs_target (cfg : unfold_proj_config := {}) : tactic unit :=
do t ← target, unfold_projs t cfg >>= unsafe_change
meta def unfold_projs_hyp (h : expr) (cfg : unfold_proj_config := {}) : tactic unit :=
revert_and_transform (λ e, unfold_projs e cfg) h
structure simp_config :=
(max_steps : nat := simp.default_max_steps)
(contextual : bool := ff) -- [TODO] what does this mean?
(lift_eq : bool := tt)
(canonize_instances : bool := tt)
(canonize_proofs : bool := ff)
(use_axioms : bool := tt)
(zeta : bool := tt)
(beta : bool := tt)
(eta : bool := tt)
(proj : bool := tt) -- reduce projections
(iota : bool := tt)
(iota_eqn : bool := ff) -- reduce using all equation lemmas generated by equation/pattern-matching compiler
(constructor_eq : bool := tt)
(single_pass : bool := ff)
(fail_if_unchanged := tt)
(memoize := tt)
/--
`simplify s e cfg r prove` simplify `e` using `s` using bottom-up traversal.
`discharger` is a tactic for dischaging new subgoals created by the simplifier.
If it fails, the simplifier tries to discharge the subgoal by simplifying it to `true`.
The parameter `to_unfold` specifies definitions that should be delta-reduced,
and projection applications that should be unfolded.
-/
meta constant simplify (s : simp_lemmas) (to_unfold : list name := []) (e : expr) (cfg : simp_config := {}) (r : name := `eq)
(discharger : tactic unit := failed) : tactic (expr × expr)
meta def simp_target (s : simp_lemmas) (to_unfold : list name := []) (cfg : simp_config := {}) (discharger : tactic unit := failed) : tactic unit :=
do t ← target,
(new_t, pr) ← simplify s to_unfold t cfg `eq discharger,
replace_target new_t pr
meta def simp_hyp (s : simp_lemmas) (to_unfold : list name := []) (h : expr) (cfg : simp_config := {}) (discharger : tactic unit := failed) : tactic expr :=
do when (expr.is_local_constant h = ff) (fail "tactic simp_at failed, the given expression is not a hypothesis"),
htype ← infer_type h,
(h_new_type, pr) ← simplify s to_unfold htype cfg `eq discharger,
replace_hyp h h_new_type pr
/--
`ext_simplify_core a c s discharger pre post r e`:
- `a : α` - initial user data
- `c : simp_config` - simp configuration options
- `s : simp_lemmas` - the set of simp_lemmas to use. Remark: the simplification lemmas are not applied automatically like in the simplify tactic. The caller must use them at pre/post.
- `discharger : α → tactic α` - tactic for dischaging hypothesis in conditional rewriting rules. The argument 'α' is the current user data.
- `pre a s r p e` is invoked before visiting the children of subterm 'e'.
+ arguments:
- `a` is the current user data
- `s` is the updated set of lemmas if 'contextual' is `tt`,
- `r` is the simplification relation being used,
- `p` is the "parent" expression (if there is one).
- `e` is the current subexpression in question.
+ if it succeeds the result is `(new_a, new_e, new_pr, flag)` where
- `new_a` is the new value for the user data
- `new_e` is a new expression s.t. `r e new_e`
- `new_pr` is a proof for `e r new_e`, If it is none, the proof is assumed to be by reflexivity
- `flag` if tt `new_e` children should be visited, and `post` invoked.
- `(post a s r p e)` is invoked after visiting the children of subterm `e`,
The output is similar to `(pre a r s p e)`, but the 'flag' indicates whether the new expression should be revisited or not.
- `r` is the simplification relation. Usually `=` or `↔`.
- `e` is the input expression to be simplified.
The method returns `(a,e,pr)` where
- `a` is the final user data
- `e` is the new expression
- `pr` is the proof that the given expression equals the input expression.
-/
meta constant ext_simplify_core
{α : Type}
(a : α)
(c : simp_config)
(s : simp_lemmas)
(discharger : α → tactic α)
(pre : α → simp_lemmas → name → option expr → expr → tactic (α × expr × option expr × bool))
(post : α → simp_lemmas → name → option expr → expr → tactic (α × expr × option expr × bool))
(r : name) :
expr → tactic (α × expr × expr)
private meta def is_equation : expr → bool
| (expr.pi n bi d b) := is_equation b
| e := match (expr.is_eq e) with (some a) := tt | none := ff end
meta def collect_ctx_simps : tactic (list expr) :=
local_context
section simp_intros
meta def intro1_aux : bool → list name → tactic expr
| ff _ := intro1
| tt (n::ns) := intro n
| _ _ := failed
structure simp_intros_config extends simp_config :=
(use_hyps := ff)
meta def simp_intros_aux (cfg : simp_config) (use_hyps : bool) (to_unfold : list name) : simp_lemmas → bool → list name → tactic simp_lemmas
| S tt [] := try (simp_target S to_unfold cfg) >> return S
| S use_ns ns := do
t ← target,
if t.is_napp_of `not 1 then
intro1_aux use_ns ns >> simp_intros_aux S use_ns ns.tail
else if t.is_arrow then
do {
d ← return t.binding_domain,
(new_d, h_d_eq_new_d) ← simplify S to_unfold d cfg,
h_d ← intro1_aux use_ns ns,
h_new_d ← mk_eq_mp h_d_eq_new_d h_d,
assertv_core h_d.local_pp_name new_d h_new_d,
clear h_d,
h_new ← intro1,
new_S ← if use_hyps then mcond (is_prop new_d) (S.add h_new ff) (return S)
else return S,
simp_intros_aux new_S use_ns ns.tail
}
<|>
-- failed to simplify... we just introduce and continue
(intro1_aux use_ns ns >> simp_intros_aux S use_ns ns.tail)
else if t.is_pi || t.is_let then
intro1_aux use_ns ns >> simp_intros_aux S use_ns ns.tail
else do
new_t ← whnf t reducible,
if new_t.is_pi then unsafe_change new_t >> simp_intros_aux S use_ns ns
else
try (simp_target S to_unfold cfg) >>
mcond (expr.is_pi <$> target)
(simp_intros_aux S use_ns ns)
(if use_ns ∧ ¬ns.empty then failed else return S)
meta def simp_intros (s : simp_lemmas) (to_unfold : list name := []) (ids : list name := []) (cfg : simp_intros_config := {}) : tactic unit :=
step $ simp_intros_aux cfg.to_simp_config cfg.use_hyps to_unfold s (bnot ids.empty) ids
end simp_intros
meta def mk_eq_simp_ext (simp_ext : expr → tactic (expr × expr)) : tactic unit :=
do (lhs, rhs) ← target >>= match_eq,
(new_rhs, heq) ← simp_ext lhs,
unify rhs new_rhs,
exact heq
/- Simp attribute support -/
meta def to_simp_lemmas : simp_lemmas → list name → tactic simp_lemmas
| S [] := return S
| S (n::ns) := do S' ← S.add_simp n ff, to_simp_lemmas S' ns
meta def mk_simp_attr (attr_name : name) (attr_deps : list name := []) : command :=
do let t := `(user_attribute simp_lemmas),
let v := `({name := attr_name,
descr := "simplifier attribute",
cache_cfg := {
mk_cache := λ ns, do {
s ← tactic.to_simp_lemmas simp_lemmas.mk ns,
s ← attr_deps.mfoldl
(λ s attr_name, do
ns ← attribute.get_instances attr_name,
to_simp_lemmas s ns)
s,
return s },
dependencies := `reducibility :: attr_deps}} : user_attribute simp_lemmas),
let n := mk_simp_attr_decl_name attr_name,
add_decl (declaration.defn n [] t v reducibility_hints.abbrev ff),
attribute.register n
/--
### Example usage:
```lean
-- make a new simp attribute called "my_reduction"
run_cmd mk_simp_attr `my_reduction
-- Add "my_reduction" attributes to these if-reductions
attribute [my_reduction] if_pos if_neg dif_pos dif_neg
-- will return the simp_lemmas with the `my_reduction` attribute.
#eval get_user_simp_lemmas `my_reduction
```
-/
meta def get_user_simp_lemmas (attr_name : name) : tactic simp_lemmas :=
if attr_name = `default then simp_lemmas.mk_default
else get_attribute_cache_dyn (mk_simp_attr_decl_name attr_name)
meta def join_user_simp_lemmas_core : simp_lemmas → list name → tactic simp_lemmas
| S [] := return S
| S (attr_name::R) := do S' ← get_user_simp_lemmas attr_name, join_user_simp_lemmas_core (S.join S') R
meta def join_user_simp_lemmas (no_dflt : bool) (attrs : list name) : tactic simp_lemmas :=
if no_dflt then
join_user_simp_lemmas_core simp_lemmas.mk attrs
else do
s ← simp_lemmas.mk_default,
join_user_simp_lemmas_core s attrs
/-- Normalize numerical expression, returns a pair (n, pr) where n is the resultant numeral,
and pr is a proof that the input argument is equal to n. -/
meta constant norm_num : expr → tactic (expr × expr)
meta def simplify_top_down {α} (a : α) (pre : α → expr → tactic (α × expr × expr)) (e : expr) (cfg : simp_config := {}) : tactic (α × expr × expr) :=
ext_simplify_core a cfg simp_lemmas.mk (λ _, failed)
(λ a _ _ _ e, do (new_a, new_e, pr) ← pre a e, guard (¬ new_e =ₐ e), return (new_a, new_e, some pr, tt))
(λ _ _ _ _ _, failed)
`eq e
meta def simp_top_down (pre : expr → tactic (expr × expr)) (cfg : simp_config := {}) : tactic unit :=
do t ← target,
(_, new_target, pr) ← simplify_top_down () (λ _ e, do (new_e, pr) ← pre e, return ((), new_e, pr)) t cfg,
replace_target new_target pr
meta def simplify_bottom_up {α} (a : α) (post : α → expr → tactic (α × expr × expr)) (e : expr) (cfg : simp_config := {}) : tactic (α × expr × expr) :=
ext_simplify_core a cfg simp_lemmas.mk (λ _, failed)
(λ _ _ _ _ _, failed)
(λ a _ _ _ e, do (new_a, new_e, pr) ← post a e, guard (¬ new_e =ₐ e), return (new_a, new_e, some pr, tt))
`eq e
meta def simp_bottom_up (post : expr → tactic (expr × expr)) (cfg : simp_config := {}) : tactic unit :=
do t ← target,
(_, new_target, pr) ← simplify_bottom_up () (λ _ e, do (new_e, pr) ← post e, return ((), new_e, pr)) t cfg,
replace_target new_target pr
private meta def remove_deps (s : name_set) (h : expr) : name_set :=
if s.empty then s
else h.fold s (λ e o s, if e.is_local_constant then s.erase e.local_uniq_name else s)
/- Return the list of hypothesis that are propositions and do not have
forward dependencies. -/
meta def non_dep_prop_hyps : tactic (list expr) :=
do
ctx ← local_context,
s ← ctx.mfoldl (λ s h, do
h_type ← infer_type h,
let s := remove_deps s h_type,
h_val ← head_zeta h,
let s := if h_val =ₐ h then s else remove_deps s h_val,
mcond (is_prop h_type)
(return $ s.insert h.local_uniq_name)
(return s)) mk_name_set,
t ← target,
let s := remove_deps s t,
return $ ctx.filter (λ h, s.contains h.local_uniq_name)
section simp_all
meta structure simp_all_entry :=
(h : expr) -- hypothesis
(new_type : expr) -- new type
(pr : option expr) -- proof that type of h is equal to new_type
(s : simp_lemmas) -- simplification lemmas for simplifying new_type
private meta def update_simp_lemmas (es : list simp_all_entry) (h : expr) : tactic (list simp_all_entry) :=
es.mmap $ λ e, do new_s ← e.s.add h ff, return {s := new_s, ..e}
/- Helper tactic for `init`.
Remark: the following tactic is quadratic on the length of list expr (the list of non dependent propositions).
We can make it more efficient as soon as we have an efficient simp_lemmas.erase. -/
private meta def init_aux : list expr → simp_lemmas → list simp_all_entry → tactic (simp_lemmas × list simp_all_entry)
| [] s r := return (s, r)
| (h::hs) s r := do
new_r ← update_simp_lemmas r h,
new_s ← s.add h ff,
h_type ← infer_type h,
init_aux hs new_s (⟨h, h_type, none, s⟩::new_r)
private meta def init (s : simp_lemmas) (hs : list expr) : tactic (simp_lemmas × list simp_all_entry) :=
init_aux hs s []
private meta def add_new_hyps (es : list simp_all_entry) : tactic unit :=
es.mmap' $ λ e,
match e.pr with
| none := return ()
| some pr :=
assert e.h.local_pp_name e.new_type >>
mk_eq_mp pr e.h >>= exact
end
private meta def clear_old_hyps (es : list simp_all_entry) : tactic unit :=
es.mmap' $ λ e, when (e.pr ≠ none) (try (clear e.h))
private meta def join_pr : option expr → expr → tactic expr
| none pr₂ := return pr₂
| (some pr₁) pr₂ := mk_eq_trans pr₁ pr₂
private meta def loop (cfg : simp_config) (discharger : tactic unit) (to_unfold : list name)
: list simp_all_entry → list simp_all_entry → simp_lemmas → bool → tactic unit
| [] r s m :=
if m then loop r [] s ff
else do
add_new_hyps r,
target_changed ← (simp_target s to_unfold cfg discharger >> return tt) <|> return ff,
guard (cfg.fail_if_unchanged = ff ∨ target_changed ∨ r.any (λ e, e.pr ≠ none)) <|> fail "simp_all tactic failed to simplify",
clear_old_hyps r
| (e::es) r s m := do
let ⟨h, h_type, h_pr, s'⟩ := e,
(new_h_type, new_pr) ← simplify s' to_unfold h_type {fail_if_unchanged := ff, ..cfg} `eq discharger,
if h_type =ₐ new_h_type then loop es (e::r) s m
else do
new_pr ← join_pr h_pr new_pr,
new_fact_pr ← mk_eq_mp new_pr h,
if new_h_type = `(false) then do
tgt ← target,
to_expr ``(@false.rec %%tgt %%new_fact_pr) >>= exact
else do
h0_type ← infer_type h,
let new_fact_pr := mk_id_proof new_h_type new_fact_pr,
new_es ← update_simp_lemmas es new_fact_pr,
new_r ← update_simp_lemmas r new_fact_pr,
let new_r := {new_type := new_h_type, pr := new_pr, ..e} :: new_r,
new_s ← s.add new_fact_pr ff,
loop new_es new_r new_s tt
meta def simp_all (s : simp_lemmas) (to_unfold : list name) (cfg : simp_config := {}) (discharger : tactic unit := failed) : tactic unit :=
do hs ← non_dep_prop_hyps,
(s, es) ← init s hs,
loop cfg discharger to_unfold es [] s ff
end simp_all
/- debugging support for algebraic normalizer -/
meta constant trace_algebra_info : expr → tactic unit
end tactic
export tactic (mk_simp_attr)
run_cmd mk_simp_attr `norm [`simp]
|
53ef1dce8e70ad2ac6dac1f621ce8d61f9d02003 | bb31430994044506fa42fd667e2d556327e18dfe | /src/algebra/order/field/basic.lean | 126e30e1cd3401d6001ad24835170ed32f8d40c7 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | sgouezel/mathlib | 0cb4e5335a2ba189fa7af96d83a377f83270e503 | 00638177efd1b2534fc5269363ebf42a7871df9a | refs/heads/master | 1,674,527,483,042 | 1,673,665,568,000 | 1,673,665,568,000 | 119,598,202 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,517,348,647,000 | 1,517,348,646,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 31,640 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Robert Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Lewis, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import order.bounds.order_iso
import algebra.field.basic
import algebra.order.field.defs
import algebra.group_power.order
/-!
# Lemmas about linear ordered (semi)fields
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
-/
open function order_dual
variables {ι α β : Type*}
section linear_ordered_semifield
variables [linear_ordered_semifield α] {a b c d e : α} {m n : ℤ}
/-- `equiv.mul_left₀` as an order_iso. -/
@[simps {simp_rhs := tt}]
def order_iso.mul_left₀ (a : α) (ha : 0 < a) : α ≃o α :=
{ map_rel_iff' := λ _ _, mul_le_mul_left ha, ..equiv.mul_left₀ a ha.ne' }
/-- `equiv.mul_right₀` as an order_iso. -/
@[simps {simp_rhs := tt}]
def order_iso.mul_right₀ (a : α) (ha : 0 < a) : α ≃o α :=
{ map_rel_iff' := λ _ _, mul_le_mul_right ha, ..equiv.mul_right₀ a ha.ne' }
/-!
### Lemmas about pos, nonneg, nonpos, neg
-/
@[simp] lemma inv_pos : 0 < a⁻¹ ↔ 0 < a :=
suffices ∀ a : α, 0 < a → 0 < a⁻¹,
from ⟨λ h, inv_inv a ▸ this _ h, this a⟩,
assume a ha, flip lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left ha.le $ by simp [ne_of_gt ha, zero_lt_one]
alias inv_pos ↔ _ inv_pos_of_pos
@[simp] lemma inv_nonneg : 0 ≤ a⁻¹ ↔ 0 ≤ a :=
by simp only [le_iff_eq_or_lt, inv_pos, zero_eq_inv]
alias inv_nonneg ↔ _ inv_nonneg_of_nonneg
@[simp] lemma inv_lt_zero : a⁻¹ < 0 ↔ a < 0 :=
by simp only [← not_le, inv_nonneg]
@[simp] lemma inv_nonpos : a⁻¹ ≤ 0 ↔ a ≤ 0 :=
by simp only [← not_lt, inv_pos]
lemma one_div_pos : 0 < 1 / a ↔ 0 < a :=
inv_eq_one_div a ▸ inv_pos
lemma one_div_neg : 1 / a < 0 ↔ a < 0 :=
inv_eq_one_div a ▸ inv_lt_zero
lemma one_div_nonneg : 0 ≤ 1 / a ↔ 0 ≤ a :=
inv_eq_one_div a ▸ inv_nonneg
lemma one_div_nonpos : 1 / a ≤ 0 ↔ a ≤ 0 :=
inv_eq_one_div a ▸ inv_nonpos
lemma div_pos (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 0 < a / b :=
by { rw div_eq_mul_inv, exact mul_pos ha (inv_pos.2 hb) }
lemma div_nonneg (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : 0 ≤ a / b :=
by { rw div_eq_mul_inv, exact mul_nonneg ha (inv_nonneg.2 hb) }
lemma div_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg (ha : a ≤ 0) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : a / b ≤ 0 :=
by { rw div_eq_mul_inv, exact mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg ha (inv_nonneg.2 hb) }
lemma div_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : b ≤ 0) : a / b ≤ 0 :=
by { rw div_eq_mul_inv, exact mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos ha (inv_nonpos.2 hb) }
lemma zpow_nonneg (ha : 0 ≤ a) : ∀ n : ℤ, 0 ≤ a ^ n
| (n : ℕ) := by { rw zpow_coe_nat, exact pow_nonneg ha _ }
| -[1+n] := by { rw zpow_neg_succ_of_nat, exact inv_nonneg.2 (pow_nonneg ha _) }
lemma zpow_pos_of_pos (ha : 0 < a) : ∀ n : ℤ, 0 < a ^ n
| (n : ℕ) := by { rw zpow_coe_nat, exact pow_pos ha _ }
| -[1+n] := by { rw zpow_neg_succ_of_nat, exact inv_pos.2 (pow_pos ha _) }
/-!
### Relating one division with another term.
-/
lemma le_div_iff (hc : 0 < c) : a ≤ b / c ↔ a * c ≤ b :=
⟨λ h, div_mul_cancel b (ne_of_lt hc).symm ▸ mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h hc.le,
λ h, calc
a = a * c * (1 / c) : mul_mul_div a (ne_of_lt hc).symm
... ≤ b * (1 / c) : mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h (one_div_pos.2 hc).le
... = b / c : (div_eq_mul_one_div b c).symm⟩
lemma le_div_iff' (hc : 0 < c) : a ≤ b / c ↔ c * a ≤ b :=
by rw [mul_comm, le_div_iff hc]
lemma div_le_iff (hb : 0 < b) : a / b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c * b :=
⟨λ h, calc
a = a / b * b : by rw (div_mul_cancel _ (ne_of_lt hb).symm)
... ≤ c * b : mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h hb.le,
λ h, calc
a / b = a * (1 / b) : div_eq_mul_one_div a b
... ≤ (c * b) * (1 / b) : mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h (one_div_pos.2 hb).le
... = (c * b) / b : (div_eq_mul_one_div (c * b) b).symm
... = c : by refine (div_eq_iff (ne_of_gt hb)).mpr rfl⟩
lemma div_le_iff' (hb : 0 < b) : a / b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b * c :=
by rw [mul_comm, div_le_iff hb]
lemma lt_div_iff (hc : 0 < c) : a < b / c ↔ a * c < b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le $ div_le_iff hc
lemma lt_div_iff' (hc : 0 < c) : a < b / c ↔ c * a < b :=
by rw [mul_comm, lt_div_iff hc]
lemma div_lt_iff (hc : 0 < c) : b / c < a ↔ b < a * c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (le_div_iff hc)
lemma div_lt_iff' (hc : 0 < c) : b / c < a ↔ b < c * a :=
by rw [mul_comm, div_lt_iff hc]
lemma inv_mul_le_iff (h : 0 < b) : b⁻¹ * a ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b * c :=
begin
rw [inv_eq_one_div, mul_comm, ← div_eq_mul_one_div],
exact div_le_iff' h,
end
lemma inv_mul_le_iff' (h : 0 < b) : b⁻¹ * a ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c * b :=
by rw [inv_mul_le_iff h, mul_comm]
lemma mul_inv_le_iff (h : 0 < b) : a * b⁻¹ ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b * c :=
by rw [mul_comm, inv_mul_le_iff h]
lemma mul_inv_le_iff' (h : 0 < b) : a * b⁻¹ ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c * b :=
by rw [mul_comm, inv_mul_le_iff' h]
lemma div_self_le_one (a : α) : a / a ≤ 1 :=
if h : a = 0 then by simp [h] else by simp [h]
lemma inv_mul_lt_iff (h : 0 < b) : b⁻¹ * a < c ↔ a < b * c :=
begin
rw [inv_eq_one_div, mul_comm, ← div_eq_mul_one_div],
exact div_lt_iff' h,
end
lemma inv_mul_lt_iff' (h : 0 < b) : b⁻¹ * a < c ↔ a < c * b :=
by rw [inv_mul_lt_iff h, mul_comm]
lemma mul_inv_lt_iff (h : 0 < b) : a * b⁻¹ < c ↔ a < b * c :=
by rw [mul_comm, inv_mul_lt_iff h]
lemma mul_inv_lt_iff' (h : 0 < b) : a * b⁻¹ < c ↔ a < c * b :=
by rw [mul_comm, inv_mul_lt_iff' h]
lemma inv_pos_le_iff_one_le_mul (ha : 0 < a) : a⁻¹ ≤ b ↔ 1 ≤ b * a :=
by { rw [inv_eq_one_div], exact div_le_iff ha }
lemma inv_pos_le_iff_one_le_mul' (ha : 0 < a) : a⁻¹ ≤ b ↔ 1 ≤ a * b :=
by { rw [inv_eq_one_div], exact div_le_iff' ha }
lemma inv_pos_lt_iff_one_lt_mul (ha : 0 < a) : a⁻¹ < b ↔ 1 < b * a :=
by { rw [inv_eq_one_div], exact div_lt_iff ha }
lemma inv_pos_lt_iff_one_lt_mul' (ha : 0 < a) : a⁻¹ < b ↔ 1 < a * b :=
by { rw [inv_eq_one_div], exact div_lt_iff' ha }
/-- One direction of `div_le_iff` where `b` is allowed to be `0` (but `c` must be nonnegative) -/
lemma div_le_of_nonneg_of_le_mul (hb : 0 ≤ b) (hc : 0 ≤ c) (h : a ≤ c * b) : a / b ≤ c :=
by { rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hb with rfl|hb', simp [hc], rwa [div_le_iff hb'] }
lemma div_le_one_of_le (h : a ≤ b) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : a / b ≤ 1 :=
div_le_of_nonneg_of_le_mul hb zero_le_one $ by rwa one_mul
/-!
### Bi-implications of inequalities using inversions
-/
lemma inv_le_inv_of_le (ha : 0 < a) (h : a ≤ b) : b⁻¹ ≤ a⁻¹ :=
by rwa [← one_div a, le_div_iff' ha, ← div_eq_mul_inv, div_le_iff (ha.trans_le h), one_mul]
/-- See `inv_le_inv_of_le` for the implication from right-to-left with one fewer assumption. -/
lemma inv_le_inv (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : a⁻¹ ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ b ≤ a :=
by rw [← one_div, div_le_iff ha, ← div_eq_inv_mul, le_div_iff hb, one_mul]
/-- In a linear ordered field, for positive `a` and `b` we have `a⁻¹ ≤ b ↔ b⁻¹ ≤ a`.
See also `inv_le_of_inv_le` for a one-sided implication with one fewer assumption. -/
lemma inv_le (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : a⁻¹ ≤ b ↔ b⁻¹ ≤ a :=
by rw [← inv_le_inv hb (inv_pos.2 ha), inv_inv]
lemma inv_le_of_inv_le (ha : 0 < a) (h : a⁻¹ ≤ b) : b⁻¹ ≤ a :=
(inv_le ha ((inv_pos.2 ha).trans_le h)).1 h
lemma le_inv (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ b ≤ a⁻¹ :=
by rw [← inv_le_inv (inv_pos.2 hb) ha, inv_inv]
/-- See `inv_lt_inv_of_lt` for the implication from right-to-left with one fewer assumption. -/
lemma inv_lt_inv (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : a⁻¹ < b⁻¹ ↔ b < a :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (inv_le_inv hb ha)
lemma inv_lt_inv_of_lt (hb : 0 < b) (h : b < a) : a⁻¹ < b⁻¹ :=
(inv_lt_inv (hb.trans h) hb).2 h
/-- In a linear ordered field, for positive `a` and `b` we have `a⁻¹ < b ↔ b⁻¹ < a`.
See also `inv_lt_of_inv_lt` for a one-sided implication with one fewer assumption. -/
lemma inv_lt (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : a⁻¹ < b ↔ b⁻¹ < a :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (le_inv hb ha)
lemma inv_lt_of_inv_lt (ha : 0 < a) (h : a⁻¹ < b) : b⁻¹ < a :=
(inv_lt ha ((inv_pos.2 ha).trans h)).1 h
lemma lt_inv (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : a < b⁻¹ ↔ b < a⁻¹ :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (inv_le hb ha)
lemma inv_lt_one (ha : 1 < a) : a⁻¹ < 1 :=
by rwa [inv_lt (zero_lt_one.trans ha) zero_lt_one, inv_one]
lemma one_lt_inv (h₁ : 0 < a) (h₂ : a < 1) : 1 < a⁻¹ :=
by rwa [lt_inv zero_lt_one h₁, inv_one]
lemma inv_le_one (ha : 1 ≤ a) : a⁻¹ ≤ 1 :=
by rwa [inv_le (zero_lt_one.trans_le ha) zero_lt_one, inv_one]
lemma one_le_inv (h₁ : 0 < a) (h₂ : a ≤ 1) : 1 ≤ a⁻¹ :=
by rwa [le_inv zero_lt_one h₁, inv_one]
lemma inv_lt_one_iff_of_pos (h₀ : 0 < a) : a⁻¹ < 1 ↔ 1 < a :=
⟨λ h₁, inv_inv a ▸ one_lt_inv (inv_pos.2 h₀) h₁, inv_lt_one⟩
lemma inv_lt_one_iff : a⁻¹ < 1 ↔ a ≤ 0 ∨ 1 < a :=
begin
cases le_or_lt a 0 with ha ha,
{ simp [ha, (inv_nonpos.2 ha).trans_lt zero_lt_one] },
{ simp only [ha.not_le, false_or, inv_lt_one_iff_of_pos ha] }
end
lemma one_lt_inv_iff : 1 < a⁻¹ ↔ 0 < a ∧ a < 1 :=
⟨λ h, ⟨inv_pos.1 (zero_lt_one.trans h), inv_inv a ▸ inv_lt_one h⟩, and_imp.2 one_lt_inv⟩
lemma inv_le_one_iff : a⁻¹ ≤ 1 ↔ a ≤ 0 ∨ 1 ≤ a :=
begin
rcases em (a = 1) with (rfl|ha),
{ simp [le_rfl] },
{ simp only [ne.le_iff_lt (ne.symm ha), ne.le_iff_lt (mt inv_eq_one.1 ha), inv_lt_one_iff] }
end
lemma one_le_inv_iff : 1 ≤ a⁻¹ ↔ 0 < a ∧ a ≤ 1 :=
⟨λ h, ⟨inv_pos.1 (zero_lt_one.trans_le h), inv_inv a ▸ inv_le_one h⟩, and_imp.2 one_le_inv⟩
/-!
### Relating two divisions.
-/
@[mono] lemma div_le_div_of_le (hc : 0 ≤ c) (h : a ≤ b) : a / c ≤ b / c :=
begin
rw [div_eq_mul_one_div a c, div_eq_mul_one_div b c],
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h (one_div_nonneg.2 hc)
end
-- Not a `mono` lemma b/c `div_le_div` is strictly more general
lemma div_le_div_of_le_left (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hc : 0 < c) (h : c ≤ b) : a / b ≤ a / c :=
begin
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv],
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ((inv_le_inv (hc.trans_le h) hc).mpr h) ha
end
lemma div_le_div_of_le_of_nonneg (hab : a ≤ b) (hc : 0 ≤ c) : a / c ≤ b / c :=
div_le_div_of_le hc hab
lemma div_lt_div_of_lt (hc : 0 < c) (h : a < b) : a / c < b / c :=
begin
rw [div_eq_mul_one_div a c, div_eq_mul_one_div b c],
exact mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right h (one_div_pos.2 hc)
end
lemma div_le_div_right (hc : 0 < c) : a / c ≤ b / c ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt $ div_lt_div_of_lt hc, div_le_div_of_le $ hc.le⟩
lemma div_lt_div_right (hc : 0 < c) : a / c < b / c ↔ a < b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le $ div_le_div_right hc
lemma div_lt_div_left (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hc : 0 < c) : a / b < a / c ↔ c < b :=
by simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_lt_mul_left ha, inv_lt_inv hb hc]
lemma div_le_div_left (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hc : 0 < c) : a / b ≤ a / c ↔ c ≤ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 (div_lt_div_left ha hc hb)
lemma div_lt_div_iff (b0 : 0 < b) (d0 : 0 < d) :
a / b < c / d ↔ a * d < c * b :=
by rw [lt_div_iff d0, div_mul_eq_mul_div, div_lt_iff b0]
lemma div_le_div_iff (b0 : 0 < b) (d0 : 0 < d) : a / b ≤ c / d ↔ a * d ≤ c * b :=
by rw [le_div_iff d0, div_mul_eq_mul_div, div_le_iff b0]
@[mono] lemma div_le_div (hc : 0 ≤ c) (hac : a ≤ c) (hd : 0 < d) (hbd : d ≤ b) : a / b ≤ c / d :=
by { rw div_le_div_iff (hd.trans_le hbd) hd, exact mul_le_mul hac hbd hd.le hc }
lemma div_lt_div (hac : a < c) (hbd : d ≤ b) (c0 : 0 ≤ c) (d0 : 0 < d) :
a / b < c / d :=
(div_lt_div_iff (d0.trans_le hbd) d0).2 (mul_lt_mul hac hbd d0 c0)
lemma div_lt_div' (hac : a ≤ c) (hbd : d < b) (c0 : 0 < c) (d0 : 0 < d) :
a / b < c / d :=
(div_lt_div_iff (d0.trans hbd) d0).2 (mul_lt_mul' hac hbd d0.le c0)
lemma div_lt_div_of_lt_left (hc : 0 < c) (hb : 0 < b) (h : b < a) : c / a < c / b :=
(div_lt_div_left hc (hb.trans h) hb).mpr h
/-!
### Relating one division and involving `1`
-/
lemma div_le_self (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 1 ≤ b) : a / b ≤ a :=
by simpa only [div_one] using div_le_div_of_le_left ha zero_lt_one hb
lemma div_lt_self (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 1 < b) : a / b < a :=
by simpa only [div_one] using div_lt_div_of_lt_left ha zero_lt_one hb
lemma le_div_self (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb₀ : 0 < b) (hb₁ : b ≤ 1) : a ≤ a / b :=
by simpa only [div_one] using div_le_div_of_le_left ha hb₀ hb₁
lemma one_le_div (hb : 0 < b) : 1 ≤ a / b ↔ b ≤ a :=
by rw [le_div_iff hb, one_mul]
lemma div_le_one (hb : 0 < b) : a / b ≤ 1 ↔ a ≤ b :=
by rw [div_le_iff hb, one_mul]
lemma one_lt_div (hb : 0 < b) : 1 < a / b ↔ b < a :=
by rw [lt_div_iff hb, one_mul]
lemma div_lt_one (hb : 0 < b) : a / b < 1 ↔ a < b :=
by rw [div_lt_iff hb, one_mul]
lemma one_div_le (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 1 / a ≤ b ↔ 1 / b ≤ a :=
by simpa using inv_le ha hb
lemma one_div_lt (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 1 / a < b ↔ 1 / b < a :=
by simpa using inv_lt ha hb
lemma le_one_div (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ 1 / b ↔ b ≤ 1 / a :=
by simpa using le_inv ha hb
lemma lt_one_div (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : a < 1 / b ↔ b < 1 / a :=
by simpa using lt_inv ha hb
/-!
### Relating two divisions, involving `1`
-/
lemma one_div_le_one_div_of_le (ha : 0 < a) (h : a ≤ b) : 1 / b ≤ 1 / a :=
by simpa using inv_le_inv_of_le ha h
lemma one_div_lt_one_div_of_lt (ha : 0 < a) (h : a < b) : 1 / b < 1 / a :=
by rwa [lt_div_iff' ha, ← div_eq_mul_one_div, div_lt_one (ha.trans h)]
lemma le_of_one_div_le_one_div (ha : 0 < a) (h : 1 / a ≤ 1 / b) : b ≤ a :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt (one_div_lt_one_div_of_lt ha) h
lemma lt_of_one_div_lt_one_div (ha : 0 < a) (h : 1 / a < 1 / b) : b < a :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (one_div_le_one_div_of_le ha) h
/-- For the single implications with fewer assumptions, see `one_div_le_one_div_of_le` and
`le_of_one_div_le_one_div` -/
lemma one_div_le_one_div (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 1 / a ≤ 1 / b ↔ b ≤ a :=
div_le_div_left zero_lt_one ha hb
/-- For the single implications with fewer assumptions, see `one_div_lt_one_div_of_lt` and
`lt_of_one_div_lt_one_div` -/
lemma one_div_lt_one_div (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 1 / a < 1 / b ↔ b < a :=
div_lt_div_left zero_lt_one ha hb
lemma one_lt_one_div (h1 : 0 < a) (h2 : a < 1) : 1 < 1 / a :=
by rwa [lt_one_div zero_lt_one h1, one_div_one]
lemma one_le_one_div (h1 : 0 < a) (h2 : a ≤ 1) : 1 ≤ 1 / a :=
by rwa [le_one_div zero_lt_one h1, one_div_one]
/-!
### Results about halving.
The equalities also hold in semifields of characteristic `0`.
-/
/- TODO: Unify `add_halves` and `add_halves'` into a single lemma about
`division_semiring` + `char_zero` -/
lemma add_halves (a : α) : a / 2 + a / 2 = a :=
by rw [div_add_div_same, ← two_mul, mul_div_cancel_left a two_ne_zero]
-- TODO: Generalize to `division_semiring`
lemma add_self_div_two (a : α) : (a + a) / 2 = a :=
by rw [← mul_two, mul_div_cancel a two_ne_zero]
lemma half_pos (h : 0 < a) : 0 < a / 2 := div_pos h zero_lt_two
lemma one_half_pos : (0:α) < 1 / 2 := half_pos zero_lt_one
lemma div_two_lt_of_pos (h : 0 < a) : a / 2 < a :=
by { rw [div_lt_iff (zero_lt_two' α)], exact lt_mul_of_one_lt_right h one_lt_two }
lemma half_lt_self : 0 < a → a / 2 < a := div_two_lt_of_pos
lemma half_le_self (ha_nonneg : 0 ≤ a) : a / 2 ≤ a :=
begin
by_cases h0 : a = 0,
{ simp [h0], },
{ rw ← ne.def at h0,
exact (half_lt_self (lt_of_le_of_ne ha_nonneg h0.symm)).le, },
end
lemma one_half_lt_one : (1 / 2 : α) < 1 := half_lt_self zero_lt_one
lemma two_inv_lt_one : (2⁻¹ : α) < 1 := (one_div _).symm.trans_lt one_half_lt_one
lemma left_lt_add_div_two : a < (a + b) / 2 ↔ a < b := by simp [lt_div_iff, mul_two]
lemma add_div_two_lt_right : (a + b) / 2 < b ↔ a < b := by simp [div_lt_iff, mul_two]
/-!
### Miscellaneous lemmas
-/
lemma mul_le_mul_of_mul_div_le (h : a * (b / c) ≤ d) (hc : 0 < c) : b * a ≤ d * c :=
begin
rw [← mul_div_assoc] at h,
rwa [mul_comm b, ← div_le_iff hc],
end
lemma div_mul_le_div_mul_of_div_le_div (h : a / b ≤ c / d) (he : 0 ≤ e) :
a / (b * e) ≤ c / (d * e) :=
begin
rw [div_mul_eq_div_mul_one_div, div_mul_eq_div_mul_one_div],
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h (one_div_nonneg.2 he)
end
lemma exists_pos_mul_lt {a : α} (h : 0 < a) (b : α) : ∃ c : α, 0 < c ∧ b * c < a :=
begin
have : 0 < a / max (b + 1) 1, from div_pos h (lt_max_iff.2 (or.inr zero_lt_one)),
refine ⟨a / max (b + 1) 1, this, _⟩,
rw [← lt_div_iff this, div_div_cancel' h.ne'],
exact lt_max_iff.2 (or.inl $ lt_add_one _)
end
lemma exists_pos_lt_mul {a : α} (h : 0 < a) (b : α) : ∃ c : α, 0 < c ∧ b < c * a :=
let ⟨c, hc₀, hc⟩ := exists_pos_mul_lt h b
in ⟨c⁻¹, inv_pos.2 hc₀, by rwa [← div_eq_inv_mul, lt_div_iff hc₀]⟩
lemma monotone.div_const {β : Type*} [preorder β] {f : β → α} (hf : monotone f)
{c : α} (hc : 0 ≤ c) : monotone (λ x, (f x) / c) :=
begin
haveI := @linear_order.decidable_le α _,
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using (monotone_mul_right_of_nonneg (inv_nonneg.2 hc)).comp hf
end
lemma strict_mono.div_const {β : Type*} [preorder β] {f : β → α} (hf : strict_mono f)
{c : α} (hc : 0 < c) :
strict_mono (λ x, (f x) / c) :=
by simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using hf.mul_const (inv_pos.2 hc)
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance linear_ordered_field.to_densely_ordered : densely_ordered α :=
{ dense := λ a₁ a₂ h, ⟨(a₁ + a₂) / 2,
calc a₁ = (a₁ + a₁) / 2 : (add_self_div_two a₁).symm
... < (a₁ + a₂) / 2 : div_lt_div_of_lt zero_lt_two (add_lt_add_left h _),
calc (a₁ + a₂) / 2 < (a₂ + a₂) / 2 : div_lt_div_of_lt zero_lt_two (add_lt_add_right h _)
... = a₂ : add_self_div_two a₂⟩ }
lemma min_div_div_right {c : α} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (a b : α) : min (a / c) (b / c) = (min a b) / c :=
eq.symm $ monotone.map_min (λ x y, div_le_div_of_le hc)
lemma max_div_div_right {c : α} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (a b : α) : max (a / c) (b / c) = (max a b) / c :=
eq.symm $ monotone.map_max (λ x y, div_le_div_of_le hc)
lemma one_div_strict_anti_on : strict_anti_on (λ x : α, 1 / x) (set.Ioi 0) :=
λ x x1 y y1 xy, (one_div_lt_one_div (set.mem_Ioi.mp y1) (set.mem_Ioi.mp x1)).mpr xy
lemma one_div_pow_le_one_div_pow_of_le (a1 : 1 ≤ a) {m n : ℕ} (mn : m ≤ n) :
1 / a ^ n ≤ 1 / a ^ m :=
by refine (one_div_le_one_div _ _).mpr (pow_le_pow a1 mn);
exact pow_pos (zero_lt_one.trans_le a1) _
lemma one_div_pow_lt_one_div_pow_of_lt (a1 : 1 < a) {m n : ℕ} (mn : m < n) :
1 / a ^ n < 1 / a ^ m :=
by refine (one_div_lt_one_div _ _).mpr (pow_lt_pow a1 mn);
exact pow_pos (trans zero_lt_one a1) _
lemma one_div_pow_anti (a1 : 1 ≤ a) : antitone (λ n : ℕ, 1 / a ^ n) :=
λ m n, one_div_pow_le_one_div_pow_of_le a1
lemma one_div_pow_strict_anti (a1 : 1 < a) : strict_anti (λ n : ℕ, 1 / a ^ n) :=
λ m n, one_div_pow_lt_one_div_pow_of_lt a1
lemma inv_strict_anti_on : strict_anti_on (λ x : α, x⁻¹) (set.Ioi 0) :=
λ x hx y hy xy, (inv_lt_inv hy hx).2 xy
lemma inv_pow_le_inv_pow_of_le (a1 : 1 ≤ a) {m n : ℕ} (mn : m ≤ n) :
(a ^ n)⁻¹ ≤ (a ^ m)⁻¹ :=
by convert one_div_pow_le_one_div_pow_of_le a1 mn; simp
lemma inv_pow_lt_inv_pow_of_lt (a1 : 1 < a) {m n : ℕ} (mn : m < n) :
(a ^ n)⁻¹ < (a ^ m)⁻¹ :=
by convert one_div_pow_lt_one_div_pow_of_lt a1 mn; simp
lemma inv_pow_anti (a1 : 1 ≤ a) : antitone (λ n : ℕ, (a ^ n)⁻¹) :=
λ m n, inv_pow_le_inv_pow_of_le a1
lemma inv_pow_strict_anti (a1 : 1 < a) : strict_anti (λ n : ℕ, (a ^ n)⁻¹) :=
λ m n, inv_pow_lt_inv_pow_of_lt a1
/-! ### Results about `is_lub` and `is_glb` -/
lemma is_glb.mul_left {s : set α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hs : is_glb s b) :
is_glb ((λ b, a * b) '' s) (a * b) :=
begin
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le ha with ha | rfl,
{ exact (order_iso.mul_left₀ _ ha).is_glb_image'.2 hs, },
{ simp_rw zero_mul,
rw hs.nonempty.image_const,
exact is_glb_singleton },
end
lemma is_glb.mul_right {s : set α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hs : is_glb s b) :
is_glb ((λ b, b * a) '' s) (b * a) :=
by simpa [mul_comm] using hs.mul_left ha
end linear_ordered_semifield
section
variables [linear_ordered_field α] {a b c d : α} {n : ℤ}
/-! ### Lemmas about pos, nonneg, nonpos, neg -/
lemma div_pos_iff : 0 < a / b ↔ 0 < a ∧ 0 < b ∨ a < 0 ∧ b < 0 := by simp [division_def, mul_pos_iff]
lemma div_neg_iff : a / b < 0 ↔ 0 < a ∧ b < 0 ∨ a < 0 ∧ 0 < b := by simp [division_def, mul_neg_iff]
lemma div_nonneg_iff : 0 ≤ a / b ↔ 0 ≤ a ∧ 0 ≤ b ∨ a ≤ 0 ∧ b ≤ 0 :=
by simp [division_def, mul_nonneg_iff]
lemma div_nonpos_iff : a / b ≤ 0 ↔ 0 ≤ a ∧ b ≤ 0 ∨ a ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ b :=
by simp [division_def, mul_nonpos_iff]
lemma div_nonneg_of_nonpos (ha : a ≤ 0) (hb : b ≤ 0) : 0 ≤ a / b :=
div_nonneg_iff.2 $ or.inr ⟨ha, hb⟩
lemma div_pos_of_neg_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : 0 < a / b :=
div_pos_iff.2 $ or.inr ⟨ha, hb⟩
lemma div_neg_of_neg_of_pos (ha : a < 0) (hb : 0 < b) : a / b < 0 :=
div_neg_iff.2 $ or.inr ⟨ha, hb⟩
lemma div_neg_of_pos_of_neg (ha : 0 < a) (hb : b < 0) : a / b < 0 :=
div_neg_iff.2 $ or.inl ⟨ha, hb⟩
/-! ### Relating one division with another term -/
lemma div_le_iff_of_neg (hc : c < 0) : b / c ≤ a ↔ a * c ≤ b :=
⟨λ h, div_mul_cancel b (ne_of_lt hc) ▸ mul_le_mul_of_nonpos_right h hc.le,
λ h, calc
a = a * c * (1 / c) : mul_mul_div a (ne_of_lt hc)
... ≥ b * (1 / c) : mul_le_mul_of_nonpos_right h (one_div_neg.2 hc).le
... = b / c : (div_eq_mul_one_div b c).symm⟩
lemma div_le_iff_of_neg' (hc : c < 0) : b / c ≤ a ↔ c * a ≤ b :=
by rw [mul_comm, div_le_iff_of_neg hc]
lemma le_div_iff_of_neg (hc : c < 0) : a ≤ b / c ↔ b ≤ a * c :=
by rw [← neg_neg c, mul_neg, div_neg, le_neg,
div_le_iff (neg_pos.2 hc), neg_mul]
lemma le_div_iff_of_neg' (hc : c < 0) : a ≤ b / c ↔ b ≤ c * a :=
by rw [mul_comm, le_div_iff_of_neg hc]
lemma div_lt_iff_of_neg (hc : c < 0) : b / c < a ↔ a * c < b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le $ le_div_iff_of_neg hc
lemma div_lt_iff_of_neg' (hc : c < 0) : b / c < a ↔ c * a < b :=
by rw [mul_comm, div_lt_iff_of_neg hc]
lemma lt_div_iff_of_neg (hc : c < 0) : a < b / c ↔ b < a * c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le $ div_le_iff_of_neg hc
lemma lt_div_iff_of_neg' (hc : c < 0) : a < b / c ↔ b < c * a :=
by rw [mul_comm, lt_div_iff_of_neg hc]
/-! ### Bi-implications of inequalities using inversions -/
lemma inv_le_inv_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : a⁻¹ ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ b ≤ a :=
by rw [← one_div, div_le_iff_of_neg ha, ← div_eq_inv_mul, div_le_iff_of_neg hb, one_mul]
lemma inv_le_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : a⁻¹ ≤ b ↔ b⁻¹ ≤ a :=
by rw [← inv_le_inv_of_neg hb (inv_lt_zero.2 ha), inv_inv]
lemma le_inv_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : a ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ b ≤ a⁻¹ :=
by rw [← inv_le_inv_of_neg (inv_lt_zero.2 hb) ha, inv_inv]
lemma inv_lt_inv_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : a⁻¹ < b⁻¹ ↔ b < a :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (inv_le_inv_of_neg hb ha)
lemma inv_lt_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : a⁻¹ < b ↔ b⁻¹ < a :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (le_inv_of_neg hb ha)
lemma lt_inv_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : a < b⁻¹ ↔ b < a⁻¹ :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (inv_le_of_neg hb ha)
/-! ### Relating two divisions -/
lemma div_le_div_of_nonpos_of_le (hc : c ≤ 0) (h : b ≤ a) : a / c ≤ b / c :=
begin
rw [div_eq_mul_one_div a c, div_eq_mul_one_div b c],
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonpos_right h (one_div_nonpos.2 hc)
end
lemma div_lt_div_of_neg_of_lt (hc : c < 0) (h : b < a) : a / c < b / c :=
begin
rw [div_eq_mul_one_div a c, div_eq_mul_one_div b c],
exact mul_lt_mul_of_neg_right h (one_div_neg.2 hc)
end
lemma div_le_div_right_of_neg (hc : c < 0) : a / c ≤ b / c ↔ b ≤ a :=
⟨le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt $ div_lt_div_of_neg_of_lt hc, div_le_div_of_nonpos_of_le $ hc.le⟩
lemma div_lt_div_right_of_neg (hc : c < 0) : a / c < b / c ↔ b < a :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le $ div_le_div_right_of_neg hc
/-! ### Relating one division and involving `1` -/
lemma one_le_div_of_neg (hb : b < 0) : 1 ≤ a / b ↔ a ≤ b :=
by rw [le_div_iff_of_neg hb, one_mul]
lemma div_le_one_of_neg (hb : b < 0) : a / b ≤ 1 ↔ b ≤ a :=
by rw [div_le_iff_of_neg hb, one_mul]
lemma one_lt_div_of_neg (hb : b < 0) : 1 < a / b ↔ a < b :=
by rw [lt_div_iff_of_neg hb, one_mul]
lemma div_lt_one_of_neg (hb : b < 0) : a / b < 1 ↔ b < a :=
by rw [div_lt_iff_of_neg hb, one_mul]
lemma one_div_le_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : 1 / a ≤ b ↔ 1 / b ≤ a :=
by simpa using inv_le_of_neg ha hb
lemma one_div_lt_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : 1 / a < b ↔ 1 / b < a :=
by simpa using inv_lt_of_neg ha hb
lemma le_one_div_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : a ≤ 1 / b ↔ b ≤ 1 / a :=
by simpa using le_inv_of_neg ha hb
lemma lt_one_div_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : a < 1 / b ↔ b < 1 / a :=
by simpa using lt_inv_of_neg ha hb
lemma one_lt_div_iff : 1 < a / b ↔ 0 < b ∧ b < a ∨ b < 0 ∧ a < b :=
begin
rcases lt_trichotomy b 0 with (hb|rfl|hb),
{ simp [hb, hb.not_lt, one_lt_div_of_neg] },
{ simp [lt_irrefl, zero_le_one] },
{ simp [hb, hb.not_lt, one_lt_div] }
end
lemma one_le_div_iff : 1 ≤ a / b ↔ 0 < b ∧ b ≤ a ∨ b < 0 ∧ a ≤ b :=
begin
rcases lt_trichotomy b 0 with (hb|rfl|hb),
{ simp [hb, hb.not_lt, one_le_div_of_neg] },
{ simp [lt_irrefl, zero_lt_one.not_le, zero_lt_one] },
{ simp [hb, hb.not_lt, one_le_div] }
end
lemma div_lt_one_iff : a / b < 1 ↔ 0 < b ∧ a < b ∨ b = 0 ∨ b < 0 ∧ b < a :=
begin
rcases lt_trichotomy b 0 with (hb|rfl|hb),
{ simp [hb, hb.not_lt, hb.ne, div_lt_one_of_neg] },
{ simp [zero_lt_one], },
{ simp [hb, hb.not_lt, div_lt_one, hb.ne.symm] }
end
lemma div_le_one_iff : a / b ≤ 1 ↔ 0 < b ∧ a ≤ b ∨ b = 0 ∨ b < 0 ∧ b ≤ a :=
begin
rcases lt_trichotomy b 0 with (hb|rfl|hb),
{ simp [hb, hb.not_lt, hb.ne, div_le_one_of_neg] },
{ simp [zero_le_one], },
{ simp [hb, hb.not_lt, div_le_one, hb.ne.symm] }
end
/-! ### Relating two divisions, involving `1` -/
lemma one_div_le_one_div_of_neg_of_le (hb : b < 0) (h : a ≤ b) : 1 / b ≤ 1 / a :=
by rwa [div_le_iff_of_neg' hb, ← div_eq_mul_one_div, div_le_one_of_neg (h.trans_lt hb)]
lemma one_div_lt_one_div_of_neg_of_lt (hb : b < 0) (h : a < b) : 1 / b < 1 / a :=
by rwa [div_lt_iff_of_neg' hb, ← div_eq_mul_one_div, div_lt_one_of_neg (h.trans hb)]
lemma le_of_neg_of_one_div_le_one_div (hb : b < 0) (h : 1 / a ≤ 1 / b) : b ≤ a :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt (one_div_lt_one_div_of_neg_of_lt hb) h
lemma lt_of_neg_of_one_div_lt_one_div (hb : b < 0) (h : 1 / a < 1 / b) : b < a :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (one_div_le_one_div_of_neg_of_le hb) h
/-- For the single implications with fewer assumptions, see `one_div_lt_one_div_of_neg_of_lt` and
`lt_of_one_div_lt_one_div` -/
lemma one_div_le_one_div_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : 1 / a ≤ 1 / b ↔ b ≤ a :=
by simpa [one_div] using inv_le_inv_of_neg ha hb
/-- For the single implications with fewer assumptions, see `one_div_lt_one_div_of_lt` and
`lt_of_one_div_lt_one_div` -/
lemma one_div_lt_one_div_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : 1 / a < 1 / b ↔ b < a :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (one_div_le_one_div_of_neg hb ha)
lemma one_div_lt_neg_one (h1 : a < 0) (h2 : -1 < a) : 1 / a < -1 :=
suffices 1 / a < 1 / -1, by rwa one_div_neg_one_eq_neg_one at this,
one_div_lt_one_div_of_neg_of_lt h1 h2
lemma one_div_le_neg_one (h1 : a < 0) (h2 : -1 ≤ a) : 1 / a ≤ -1 :=
suffices 1 / a ≤ 1 / -1, by rwa one_div_neg_one_eq_neg_one at this,
one_div_le_one_div_of_neg_of_le h1 h2
/-! ### Results about halving -/
lemma sub_self_div_two (a : α) : a - a / 2 = a / 2 :=
suffices a / 2 + a / 2 - a / 2 = a / 2, by rwa add_halves at this,
by rw [add_sub_cancel]
lemma div_two_sub_self (a : α) : a / 2 - a = - (a / 2) :=
suffices a / 2 - (a / 2 + a / 2) = - (a / 2), by rwa add_halves at this,
by rw [sub_add_eq_sub_sub, sub_self, zero_sub]
lemma add_sub_div_two_lt (h : a < b) : a + (b - a) / 2 < b :=
begin
rwa [← div_sub_div_same, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm (b/2), ← add_assoc, ← sub_eq_add_neg,
← lt_sub_iff_add_lt, sub_self_div_two, sub_self_div_two, div_lt_div_right (zero_lt_two' α)]
end
/-- An inequality involving `2`. -/
lemma sub_one_div_inv_le_two (a2 : 2 ≤ a) : (1 - 1 / a)⁻¹ ≤ 2 :=
begin
-- Take inverses on both sides to obtain `2⁻¹ ≤ 1 - 1 / a`
refine (inv_le_inv_of_le (inv_pos.2 $ zero_lt_two' α) _).trans_eq (inv_inv (2 : α)),
-- move `1 / a` to the left and `1 - 1 / 2 = 1 / 2` to the right to obtain `1 / a ≤ ⅟ 2`
refine (le_sub_iff_add_le.2 (_ : _ + 2⁻¹ = _ ).le).trans ((sub_le_sub_iff_left 1).2 _),
{ -- show 2⁻¹ + 2⁻¹ = 1
exact (two_mul _).symm.trans (mul_inv_cancel two_ne_zero) },
{ -- take inverses on both sides and use the assumption `2 ≤ a`.
exact (one_div a).le.trans (inv_le_inv_of_le zero_lt_two a2) }
end
/-! ### Results about `is_lub` and `is_glb` -/
-- TODO: Generalize to `linear_ordered_semifield`
lemma is_lub.mul_left {s : set α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hs : is_lub s b) :
is_lub ((λ b, a * b) '' s) (a * b) :=
begin
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le ha with ha | rfl,
{ exact (order_iso.mul_left₀ _ ha).is_lub_image'.2 hs, },
{ simp_rw zero_mul,
rw hs.nonempty.image_const,
exact is_lub_singleton },
end
-- TODO: Generalize to `linear_ordered_semifield`
lemma is_lub.mul_right {s : set α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hs : is_lub s b) :
is_lub ((λ b, b * a) '' s) (b * a) :=
by simpa [mul_comm] using hs.mul_left ha
/-! ### Miscellaneous lemmmas -/
lemma mul_sub_mul_div_mul_neg_iff (hc : c ≠ 0) (hd : d ≠ 0) :
(a * d - b * c) / (c * d) < 0 ↔ a / c < b / d :=
by rw [mul_comm b c, ← div_sub_div _ _ hc hd, sub_lt_zero]
lemma mul_sub_mul_div_mul_nonpos_iff (hc : c ≠ 0) (hd : d ≠ 0) :
(a * d - b * c) / (c * d) ≤ 0 ↔ a / c ≤ b / d :=
by rw [mul_comm b c, ← div_sub_div _ _ hc hd, sub_nonpos]
alias mul_sub_mul_div_mul_neg_iff ↔ div_lt_div_of_mul_sub_mul_div_neg mul_sub_mul_div_mul_neg
alias mul_sub_mul_div_mul_nonpos_iff ↔
div_le_div_of_mul_sub_mul_div_nonpos mul_sub_mul_div_mul_nonpos
lemma exists_add_lt_and_pos_of_lt (h : b < a) : ∃ c, b + c < a ∧ 0 < c :=
⟨(a - b) / 2, add_sub_div_two_lt h, div_pos (sub_pos_of_lt h) zero_lt_two⟩
lemma le_of_forall_sub_le (h : ∀ ε > 0, b - ε ≤ a) : b ≤ a :=
begin
contrapose! h,
simpa only [and_comm ((0 : α) < _), lt_sub_iff_add_lt, gt_iff_lt]
using exists_add_lt_and_pos_of_lt h,
end
lemma mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (a0 : 0 ≤ a) (b0 : 0 ≤ b) : a * a = b * b ↔ a = b :=
mul_self_eq_mul_self_iff.trans $ or_iff_left_of_imp $
λ h, by { subst a, have : b = 0 := le_antisymm (neg_nonneg.1 a0) b0, rw [this, neg_zero] }
lemma min_div_div_right_of_nonpos (hc : c ≤ 0) (a b : α) : min (a / c) (b / c) = (max a b) / c :=
eq.symm $ antitone.map_max $ λ x y, div_le_div_of_nonpos_of_le hc
lemma max_div_div_right_of_nonpos (hc : c ≤ 0) (a b : α) : max (a / c) (b / c) = (min a b) / c :=
eq.symm $ antitone.map_min $ λ x y, div_le_div_of_nonpos_of_le hc
lemma abs_inv (a : α) : |a⁻¹| = (|a|)⁻¹ := map_inv₀ (abs_hom : α →*₀ α) a
lemma abs_div (a b : α) : |a / b| = |a| / |b| := map_div₀ (abs_hom : α →*₀ α) a b
lemma abs_one_div (a : α) : |1 / a| = 1 / |a| := by rw [abs_div, abs_one]
lemma pow_minus_two_nonneg : 0 ≤ a^(-2 : ℤ) :=
begin
simp only [inv_nonneg, zpow_neg],
change 0 ≤ a ^ ((2 : ℕ) : ℤ),
rw zpow_coe_nat,
apply sq_nonneg,
end
end
|
32629d84608005d84368552a9b517832eab977f4 | c777c32c8e484e195053731103c5e52af26a25d1 | /src/number_theory/liouville/liouville_with.lean | c05c8aeaa9979e036061a89ca4274f4f84104138 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kbuzzard/mathlib | 2ff9e85dfe2a46f4b291927f983afec17e946eb8 | 58537299e922f9c77df76cb613910914a479c1f7 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,313,702,744 | 1,683,974,212,000 | 1,683,974,212,000 | 128,185,277 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,522,920,600,000 | 1,522,920,600,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,807 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov
-/
import analysis.special_functions.pow
import number_theory.liouville.basic
import topology.instances.irrational
/-!
# Liouville numbers with a given exponent
We say that a real number `x` is a Liouville number with exponent `p : ℝ` if there exists a real
number `C` such that for infinitely many denominators `n` there exists a numerator `m` such that
`x ≠ m / n` and `|x - m / n| < C / n ^ p`. A number is a Liouville number in the sense of
`liouville` if it is `liouville_with` any real exponent, see `forall_liouville_with_iff`.
* If `p ≤ 1`, then this condition is trivial.
* If `1 < p ≤ 2`, then this condition is equivalent to `irrational x`. The forward implication
does not require `p ≤ 2` and is formalized as `liouville_with.irrational`; the other implication
follows from approximations by continued fractions and is not formalized yet.
* If `p > 2`, then this is a non-trivial condition on irrational numbers. In particular,
[Thue–Siegel–Roth theorem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roth's_theorem) states that such numbers
must be transcendental.
In this file we define the predicate `liouville_with` and prove some basic facts about this
predicate.
## Tags
Liouville number, irrational, irrationality exponent
-/
open filter metric real set
open_locale filter topology
/-- We say that a real number `x` is a Liouville number with exponent `p : ℝ` if there exists a real
number `C` such that for infinitely many denominators `n` there exists a numerator `m` such that
`x ≠ m / n` and `|x - m / n| < C / n ^ p`.
A number is a Liouville number in the sense of `liouville` if it is `liouville_with` any real
exponent. -/
def liouville_with (p x : ℝ) : Prop :=
∃ C, ∃ᶠ n : ℕ in at_top, ∃ m : ℤ, x ≠ m / n ∧ |x - m / n| < C / n ^ p
/-- For `p = 1` (hence, for any `p ≤ 1`), the condition `liouville_with p x` is trivial. -/
lemma liouville_with_one (x : ℝ) : liouville_with 1 x :=
begin
use 2,
refine ((eventually_gt_at_top 0).mono $ λ n hn, _).frequently,
have hn' : (0 : ℝ) < n, by simpa,
have : x < ↑(⌊x * ↑n⌋ + 1) / ↑n,
{ rw [lt_div_iff hn', int.cast_add, int.cast_one], exact int.lt_floor_add_one _ },
refine ⟨⌊x * n⌋ + 1, this.ne, _⟩,
rw [abs_sub_comm, abs_of_pos (sub_pos.2 this), rpow_one, sub_lt_iff_lt_add',
add_div_eq_mul_add_div _ _ hn'.ne', div_lt_div_right hn'],
simpa [bit0, ← add_assoc] using (int.floor_le (x * n)).trans_lt (lt_add_one _)
end
namespace liouville_with
variables {p q x y : ℝ} {r : ℚ} {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ}
/-- The constant `C` provided by the definition of `liouville_with` can be made positive.
We also add `1 ≤ n` to the list of assumptions about the denominator. While it is equivalent to
the original statement, the case `n = 0` breaks many arguments. -/
lemma exists_pos (h : liouville_with p x) :
∃ (C : ℝ) (h₀ : 0 < C),
∃ᶠ n : ℕ in at_top, 1 ≤ n ∧ ∃ m : ℤ, x ≠ m / n ∧ |x - m / n| < C / n ^ p :=
begin
rcases h with ⟨C, hC⟩,
refine ⟨max C 1, zero_lt_one.trans_le $ le_max_right _ _, _⟩,
refine ((eventually_ge_at_top 1).and_frequently hC).mono _,
rintro n ⟨hle, m, hne, hlt⟩,
refine ⟨hle, m, hne, hlt.trans_le _⟩,
exact div_le_div_of_le (rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg _) (le_max_left _ _)
end
/-- If a number is Liouville with exponent `p`, then it is Liouville with any smaller exponent. -/
lemma mono (h : liouville_with p x) (hle : q ≤ p) : liouville_with q x :=
begin
rcases h.exists_pos with ⟨C, hC₀, hC⟩,
refine ⟨C, hC.mono _⟩, rintro n ⟨hn, m, hne, hlt⟩,
refine ⟨m, hne, hlt.trans_le $ div_le_div_of_le_left hC₀.le _ _⟩,
exacts [rpow_pos_of_pos (nat.cast_pos.2 hn) _,
rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le (nat.one_le_cast.2 hn) hle]
end
/-- If `x` satisfies Liouville condition with exponent `p` and `q < p`, then `x`
satisfies Liouville condition with exponent `q` and constant `1`. -/
lemma frequently_lt_rpow_neg (h : liouville_with p x) (hlt : q < p) :
∃ᶠ n : ℕ in at_top, ∃ m : ℤ, x ≠ m / n ∧ |x - m / n| < n ^ (-q) :=
begin
rcases h.exists_pos with ⟨C, hC₀, hC⟩,
have : ∀ᶠ n : ℕ in at_top, C < n ^ (p - q),
by simpa only [(∘), neg_sub, one_div] using ((tendsto_rpow_at_top (sub_pos.2 hlt)).comp
tendsto_coe_nat_at_top_at_top).eventually (eventually_gt_at_top C),
refine (this.and_frequently hC).mono _,
rintro n ⟨hnC, hn, m, hne, hlt⟩,
replace hn : (0 : ℝ) < n := nat.cast_pos.2 hn,
refine ⟨m, hne, hlt.trans $ (div_lt_iff $ rpow_pos_of_pos hn _).2 _⟩,
rwa [mul_comm, ← rpow_add hn, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
end
/-- The product of a Liouville number and a nonzero rational number is again a Liouville number. -/
lemma mul_rat (h : liouville_with p x) (hr : r ≠ 0) : liouville_with p (x * r) :=
begin
rcases h.exists_pos with ⟨C, hC₀, hC⟩,
refine ⟨r.denom ^ p * (|r| * C), (tendsto_id.nsmul_at_top r.pos).frequently (hC.mono _)⟩,
rintro n ⟨hn, m, hne, hlt⟩,
have A : (↑(r.num * m) : ℝ) / ↑(r.denom • id n) = (m / n) * r,
by simp [← div_mul_div_comm, ← r.cast_def, mul_comm],
refine ⟨r.num * m, _, _⟩,
{ rw A, simp [hne, hr] },
{ rw [A, ← sub_mul, abs_mul],
simp only [smul_eq_mul, id.def, nat.cast_mul],
refine (mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right hlt $ abs_pos.2 $ rat.cast_ne_zero.2 hr).trans_le _,
rw [mul_rpow, mul_div_mul_left, mul_comm, mul_div_assoc],
exacts [(rpow_pos_of_pos (nat.cast_pos.2 r.pos) _).ne', nat.cast_nonneg _, nat.cast_nonneg _] }
end
/-- The product `x * r`, `r : ℚ`, `r ≠ 0`, is a Liouville number with exponent `p` if and only if
`x` satisfies the same condition. -/
lemma mul_rat_iff (hr : r ≠ 0) : liouville_with p (x * r) ↔ liouville_with p x :=
⟨λ h, by simpa only [mul_assoc, ← rat.cast_mul, mul_inv_cancel hr, rat.cast_one, mul_one]
using h.mul_rat (inv_ne_zero hr), λ h, h.mul_rat hr⟩
/-- The product `r * x`, `r : ℚ`, `r ≠ 0`, is a Liouville number with exponent `p` if and only if
`x` satisfies the same condition. -/
lemma rat_mul_iff (hr : r ≠ 0) : liouville_with p (r * x) ↔ liouville_with p x :=
by rw [mul_comm, mul_rat_iff hr]
lemma rat_mul (h : liouville_with p x) (hr : r ≠ 0) : liouville_with p (r * x) :=
(rat_mul_iff hr).2 h
lemma mul_int_iff (hm : m ≠ 0) : liouville_with p (x * m) ↔ liouville_with p x :=
by rw [← rat.cast_coe_int, mul_rat_iff (int.cast_ne_zero.2 hm)]
lemma mul_int (h : liouville_with p x) (hm : m ≠ 0) : liouville_with p (x * m) :=
(mul_int_iff hm).2 h
lemma int_mul_iff (hm : m ≠ 0) : liouville_with p (m * x) ↔ liouville_with p x :=
by rw [mul_comm, mul_int_iff hm]
lemma int_mul (h : liouville_with p x) (hm : m ≠ 0) : liouville_with p (m * x) :=
(int_mul_iff hm).2 h
lemma mul_nat_iff (hn : n ≠ 0) : liouville_with p (x * n) ↔ liouville_with p x :=
by rw [← rat.cast_coe_nat, mul_rat_iff (nat.cast_ne_zero.2 hn)]
lemma mul_nat (h : liouville_with p x) (hn : n ≠ 0) : liouville_with p (x * n) :=
(mul_nat_iff hn).2 h
lemma nat_mul_iff (hn : n ≠ 0) : liouville_with p (n * x) ↔ liouville_with p x:=
by rw [mul_comm, mul_nat_iff hn]
lemma nat_mul (h : liouville_with p x) (hn : n ≠ 0) : liouville_with p (n * x) :=
by { rw mul_comm, exact h.mul_nat hn }
lemma add_rat (h : liouville_with p x) (r : ℚ) : liouville_with p (x + r) :=
begin
rcases h.exists_pos with ⟨C, hC₀, hC⟩,
refine ⟨r.denom ^ p * C, (tendsto_id.nsmul_at_top r.pos).frequently (hC.mono _)⟩,
rintro n ⟨hn, m, hne, hlt⟩,
have hr : (0 : ℝ) < r.denom, from nat.cast_pos.2 r.pos,
have hn' : (n : ℝ) ≠ 0, from nat.cast_ne_zero.2 (zero_lt_one.trans_le hn).ne',
have : (↑(r.denom * m + r.num * n : ℤ) / ↑(r.denom • id n) : ℝ) = m / n + r,
by simp [add_div, hr.ne', mul_div_mul_left, mul_div_mul_right, hn', ← rat.cast_def],
refine ⟨r.denom * m + r.num * n, _⟩, rw [this, add_sub_add_right_eq_sub],
refine ⟨by simpa, hlt.trans_le (le_of_eq _)⟩,
have : (r.denom ^ p : ℝ) ≠ 0, from (rpow_pos_of_pos hr _).ne',
simp [mul_rpow, nat.cast_nonneg, mul_div_mul_left, this]
end
@[simp] lemma add_rat_iff : liouville_with p (x + r) ↔ liouville_with p x :=
⟨λ h, by simpa using h.add_rat (-r), λ h, h.add_rat r⟩
@[simp] lemma rat_add_iff : liouville_with p (r + x) ↔ liouville_with p x :=
by rw [add_comm, add_rat_iff]
lemma rat_add (h : liouville_with p x) (r : ℚ) : liouville_with p (r + x) :=
add_comm x r ▸ h.add_rat r
@[simp] lemma add_int_iff : liouville_with p (x + m) ↔ liouville_with p x :=
by rw [← rat.cast_coe_int m, add_rat_iff]
@[simp] lemma int_add_iff : liouville_with p (m + x) ↔ liouville_with p x :=
by rw [add_comm, add_int_iff]
@[simp] lemma add_nat_iff : liouville_with p (x + n) ↔ liouville_with p x :=
by rw [← rat.cast_coe_nat n, add_rat_iff]
@[simp] lemma nat_add_iff : liouville_with p (n + x) ↔ liouville_with p x :=
by rw [add_comm, add_nat_iff]
lemma add_int (h : liouville_with p x) (m : ℤ) : liouville_with p (x + m) := add_int_iff.2 h
lemma int_add (h : liouville_with p x) (m : ℤ) : liouville_with p (m + x) := int_add_iff.2 h
lemma add_nat (h : liouville_with p x) (n : ℕ) : liouville_with p (x + n) := h.add_int n
lemma nat_add (h : liouville_with p x) (n : ℕ) : liouville_with p (n + x) := h.int_add n
protected lemma neg (h : liouville_with p x) : liouville_with p (-x) :=
begin
rcases h with ⟨C, hC⟩,
refine ⟨C, hC.mono _⟩,
rintro n ⟨m, hne, hlt⟩,
use (-m), simp [neg_div, abs_sub_comm _ x, *]
end
@[simp] lemma neg_iff : liouville_with p (-x) ↔ liouville_with p x :=
⟨λ h, neg_neg x ▸ h.neg, liouville_with.neg⟩
@[simp] lemma sub_rat_iff : liouville_with p (x - r) ↔ liouville_with p x :=
by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← rat.cast_neg, add_rat_iff]
lemma sub_rat (h : liouville_with p x) (r : ℚ) : liouville_with p (x - r) :=
sub_rat_iff.2 h
@[simp] lemma sub_int_iff : liouville_with p (x - m) ↔ liouville_with p x :=
by rw [← rat.cast_coe_int, sub_rat_iff]
lemma sub_int (h : liouville_with p x) (m : ℤ) : liouville_with p (x - m) := sub_int_iff.2 h
@[simp] lemma sub_nat_iff : liouville_with p (x - n) ↔ liouville_with p x :=
by rw [← rat.cast_coe_nat, sub_rat_iff]
lemma sub_nat (h : liouville_with p x) (n : ℕ) : liouville_with p (x - n) := sub_nat_iff.2 h
@[simp] lemma rat_sub_iff : liouville_with p (r - x) ↔ liouville_with p x :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
lemma rat_sub (h : liouville_with p x) (r : ℚ) : liouville_with p (r - x) := rat_sub_iff.2 h
@[simp] lemma int_sub_iff : liouville_with p (m - x) ↔ liouville_with p x :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
lemma int_sub (h : liouville_with p x) (m : ℤ) : liouville_with p (m - x) := int_sub_iff.2 h
@[simp] lemma nat_sub_iff : liouville_with p (n - x) ↔ liouville_with p x :=
by simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
lemma nat_sub (h : liouville_with p x) (n : ℕ) : liouville_with p (n - x) := nat_sub_iff.2 h
lemma ne_cast_int (h : liouville_with p x) (hp : 1 < p) (m : ℤ) : x ≠ m :=
begin
rintro rfl, rename m M,
rcases ((eventually_gt_at_top 0).and_frequently (h.frequently_lt_rpow_neg hp)).exists
with ⟨n : ℕ, hn : 0 < n, m : ℤ, hne : (M : ℝ) ≠ m / n, hlt : |(M - m / n : ℝ)| < n ^ (-1 : ℝ)⟩,
refine hlt.not_le _,
have hn' : (0 : ℝ) < n, by simpa,
rw [rpow_neg_one, ← one_div, sub_div' _ _ _ hn'.ne', abs_div, nat.abs_cast, div_le_div_right hn'],
norm_cast,
rw [← zero_add (1 : ℤ), int.add_one_le_iff, abs_pos, sub_ne_zero],
rw [ne.def, eq_div_iff hn'.ne'] at hne,
exact_mod_cast hne
end
/-- A number satisfying the Liouville condition with exponent `p > 1` is an irrational number. -/
protected lemma irrational (h : liouville_with p x) (hp : 1 < p) : irrational x :=
begin
rintro ⟨r, rfl⟩,
rcases eq_or_ne r 0 with (rfl|h0),
{ refine h.ne_cast_int hp 0 _, rw [rat.cast_zero, int.cast_zero] },
{ refine (h.mul_rat (inv_ne_zero h0)).ne_cast_int hp 1 _,
simp [rat.cast_ne_zero.2 h0] }
end
end liouville_with
namespace liouville
variables {x : ℝ}
/-- If `x` is a Liouville number, then for any `n`, for infinitely many denominators `b` there
exists a numerator `a` such that `x ≠ a / b` and `|x - a / b| < 1 / b ^ n`. -/
lemma frequently_exists_num (hx : liouville x) (n : ℕ) :
∃ᶠ b : ℕ in at_top, ∃ a : ℤ, x ≠ a / b ∧ |x - a / b| < 1 / b ^ n :=
begin
refine not_not.1 (λ H, _),
simp only [liouville, not_forall, not_exists, not_frequently, not_and, not_lt,
eventually_at_top] at H,
rcases H with ⟨N, hN⟩,
have : ∀ b > (1 : ℕ), ∀ᶠ m : ℕ in at_top, ∀ a : ℤ, (1 / b ^ m : ℝ) ≤ |x - a / b|,
{ intros b hb,
replace hb : (1 : ℝ) < b := nat.one_lt_cast.2 hb,
have H : tendsto (λ m, 1 / b ^ m : ℕ → ℝ) at_top (𝓝 0),
{ simp only [one_div],
exact tendsto_inv_at_top_zero.comp (tendsto_pow_at_top_at_top_of_one_lt hb) },
refine (H.eventually (hx.irrational.eventually_forall_le_dist_cast_div b)).mono _,
exact λ m hm a, hm a },
have : ∀ᶠ m : ℕ in at_top, ∀ b < N, 1 < b → ∀ a : ℤ, (1 / b ^ m : ℝ) ≤ |x - a / b|,
from (finite_lt_nat N).eventually_all.2 (λ b hb, eventually_imp_distrib_left.2 (this b)),
rcases (this.and (eventually_ge_at_top n)).exists with ⟨m, hm, hnm⟩,
rcases hx m with ⟨a, b, hb, hne, hlt⟩,
lift b to ℕ using zero_le_one.trans hb.le, norm_cast at hb, push_cast at hne hlt,
cases le_or_lt N b,
{ refine (hN b h a hne).not_lt (hlt.trans_le _),
replace hb : (1 : ℝ) < b := nat.one_lt_cast.2 hb,
have hb0 : (0 : ℝ) < b := zero_lt_one.trans hb,
exact one_div_le_one_div_of_le (pow_pos hb0 _) (pow_le_pow hb.le hnm) },
{ exact (hm b h hb _).not_lt hlt }
end
/-- A Liouville number is a Liouville number with any real exponent. -/
protected lemma liouville_with (hx : liouville x) (p : ℝ) : liouville_with p x :=
begin
suffices : liouville_with ⌈p⌉₊ x, from this.mono (nat.le_ceil p),
refine ⟨1, ((eventually_gt_at_top 1).and_frequently (hx.frequently_exists_num ⌈p⌉₊)).mono _⟩,
rintro b ⟨hb, a, hne, hlt⟩,
refine ⟨a, hne, _⟩,
rwa rpow_nat_cast
end
end liouville
/-- A number satisfies the Liouville condition with any exponent if and only if it is a Liouville
number. -/
lemma forall_liouville_with_iff {x : ℝ} : (∀ p, liouville_with p x) ↔ liouville x :=
begin
refine ⟨λ H n, _, liouville.liouville_with⟩,
rcases ((eventually_gt_at_top 1).and_frequently
((H (n + 1)).frequently_lt_rpow_neg (lt_add_one n))).exists with ⟨b, hb, a, hne, hlt⟩,
exact ⟨a, b, by exact_mod_cast hb, hne, by simpa [rpow_neg] using hlt⟩,
end
|
31e90180c1a002f80a4f3a344e46829f2cbb4845 | 80cc5bf14c8ea85ff340d1d747a127dcadeb966f | /src/analysis/normed_space/basic.lean | 6cd948e84282c90daf5112de67311b14123fdff2 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | lacker/mathlib | f2439c743c4f8eb413ec589430c82d0f73b2d539 | ddf7563ac69d42cfa4a1bfe41db1fed521bd795f | refs/heads/master | 1,671,948,326,773 | 1,601,479,268,000 | 1,601,479,268,000 | 298,686,743 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,601,070,794,000 | 1,601,070,794,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 53,406 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import topology.instances.nnreal
import topology.instances.complex
import topology.algebra.module
import topology.metric_space.antilipschitz
/-!
# Normed spaces
-/
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {ι : Type*}
noncomputable theory
open filter metric
open_locale topological_space big_operators nnreal
localized "notation f `→_{`:50 a `}`:0 b := filter.tendsto f (_root_.nhds a) (_root_.nhds b)" in filter
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `α` with a function `norm : α → ℝ`. This class is designed to
be extended in more interesting classes specifying the properties of the norm. -/
class has_norm (α : Type*) := (norm : α → ℝ)
export has_norm (norm)
notation `∥`:1024 e:1 `∥`:1 := norm e
/-- A normed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ∥x - y∥` defines
a metric space structure. -/
class normed_group (α : Type*) extends has_norm α, add_comm_group α, metric_space α :=
(dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = norm (x - y))
/-- Construct a normed group from a translation invariant distance -/
def normed_group.of_add_dist [has_norm α] [add_comm_group α] [metric_space α]
(H1 : ∀ x:α, ∥x∥ = dist x 0)
(H2 : ∀ x y z : α, dist x y ≤ dist (x + z) (y + z)) : normed_group α :=
{ dist_eq := λ x y, begin
rw H1, apply le_antisymm,
{ rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← add_right_neg y], apply H2 },
{ have := H2 (x-y) 0 y, rwa [sub_add_cancel, zero_add] at this }
end }
/-- Construct a normed group from a translation invariant distance -/
def normed_group.of_add_dist' [has_norm α] [add_comm_group α] [metric_space α]
(H1 : ∀ x:α, ∥x∥ = dist x 0)
(H2 : ∀ x y z : α, dist (x + z) (y + z) ≤ dist x y) : normed_group α :=
{ dist_eq := λ x y, begin
rw H1, apply le_antisymm,
{ have := H2 (x-y) 0 y, rwa [sub_add_cancel, zero_add] at this },
{ rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← add_right_neg y], apply H2 }
end }
/-- A normed group can be built from a norm that satisfies algebraic properties. This is
formalised in this structure. -/
structure normed_group.core (α : Type*) [add_comm_group α] [has_norm α] : Prop :=
(norm_eq_zero_iff : ∀ x : α, ∥x∥ = 0 ↔ x = 0)
(triangle : ∀ x y : α, ∥x + y∥ ≤ ∥x∥ + ∥y∥)
(norm_neg : ∀ x : α, ∥-x∥ = ∥x∥)
/-- Constructing a normed group from core properties of a norm, i.e., registering the distance and
the metric space structure from the norm properties. -/
noncomputable def normed_group.of_core (α : Type*) [add_comm_group α] [has_norm α]
(C : normed_group.core α) : normed_group α :=
{ dist := λ x y, ∥x - y∥,
dist_eq := assume x y, by refl,
dist_self := assume x, (C.norm_eq_zero_iff (x - x)).mpr (show x - x = 0, by simp),
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := assume x y h, show (x = y), from sub_eq_zero.mp $ (C.norm_eq_zero_iff (x - y)).mp h,
dist_triangle := assume x y z,
calc ∥x - z∥ = ∥x - y + (y - z)∥ : by rw sub_add_sub_cancel
... ≤ ∥x - y∥ + ∥y - z∥ : C.triangle _ _,
dist_comm := assume x y,
calc ∥x - y∥ = ∥ -(y - x)∥ : by simp
... = ∥y - x∥ : by { rw [C.norm_neg] } }
section normed_group
variables [normed_group α] [normed_group β]
lemma dist_eq_norm (g h : α) : dist g h = ∥g - h∥ :=
normed_group.dist_eq _ _
@[simp] lemma dist_zero_right (g : α) : dist g 0 = ∥g∥ :=
by rw [dist_eq_norm, sub_zero]
lemma norm_sub_rev (g h : α) : ∥g - h∥ = ∥h - g∥ :=
by simpa only [dist_eq_norm] using dist_comm g h
@[simp] lemma norm_neg (g : α) : ∥-g∥ = ∥g∥ :=
by simpa using norm_sub_rev 0 g
@[simp] lemma dist_add_left (g h₁ h₂ : α) : dist (g + h₁) (g + h₂) = dist h₁ h₂ :=
by simp [dist_eq_norm]
@[simp] lemma dist_add_right (g₁ g₂ h : α) : dist (g₁ + h) (g₂ + h) = dist g₁ g₂ :=
by simp [dist_eq_norm]
@[simp] lemma dist_neg_neg (g h : α) : dist (-g) (-h) = dist g h :=
by simp only [dist_eq_norm, neg_sub_neg, norm_sub_rev]
@[simp] lemma dist_sub_left (g h₁ h₂ : α) : dist (g - h₁) (g - h₂) = dist h₁ h₂ :=
by simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, dist_add_left, dist_neg_neg]
@[simp] lemma dist_sub_right (g₁ g₂ h : α) : dist (g₁ - h) (g₂ - h) = dist g₁ g₂ :=
dist_add_right _ _ _
/-- Triangle inequality for the norm. -/
lemma norm_add_le (g h : α) : ∥g + h∥ ≤ ∥g∥ + ∥h∥ :=
by simpa [dist_eq_norm] using dist_triangle g 0 (-h)
lemma norm_add_le_of_le {g₁ g₂ : α} {n₁ n₂ : ℝ} (H₁ : ∥g₁∥ ≤ n₁) (H₂ : ∥g₂∥ ≤ n₂) :
∥g₁ + g₂∥ ≤ n₁ + n₂ :=
le_trans (norm_add_le g₁ g₂) (add_le_add H₁ H₂)
lemma dist_add_add_le (g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂ : α) :
dist (g₁ + g₂) (h₁ + h₂) ≤ dist g₁ h₁ + dist g₂ h₂ :=
by simpa only [dist_add_left, dist_add_right] using dist_triangle (g₁ + g₂) (h₁ + g₂) (h₁ + h₂)
lemma dist_add_add_le_of_le {g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂ : α} {d₁ d₂ : ℝ}
(H₁ : dist g₁ h₁ ≤ d₁) (H₂ : dist g₂ h₂ ≤ d₂) :
dist (g₁ + g₂) (h₁ + h₂) ≤ d₁ + d₂ :=
le_trans (dist_add_add_le g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂) (add_le_add H₁ H₂)
lemma dist_sub_sub_le (g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂ : α) :
dist (g₁ - g₂) (h₁ - h₂) ≤ dist g₁ h₁ + dist g₂ h₂ :=
dist_neg_neg g₂ h₂ ▸ dist_add_add_le _ _ _ _
lemma dist_sub_sub_le_of_le {g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂ : α} {d₁ d₂ : ℝ}
(H₁ : dist g₁ h₁ ≤ d₁) (H₂ : dist g₂ h₂ ≤ d₂) :
dist (g₁ - g₂) (h₁ - h₂) ≤ d₁ + d₂ :=
le_trans (dist_sub_sub_le g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂) (add_le_add H₁ H₂)
lemma abs_dist_sub_le_dist_add_add (g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂ : α) :
abs (dist g₁ h₁ - dist g₂ h₂) ≤ dist (g₁ + g₂) (h₁ + h₂) :=
by simpa only [dist_add_left, dist_add_right, dist_comm h₂]
using abs_dist_sub_le (g₁ + g₂) (h₁ + h₂) (h₁ + g₂)
@[simp] lemma norm_nonneg (g : α) : 0 ≤ ∥g∥ :=
by { rw[←dist_zero_right], exact dist_nonneg }
@[simp] lemma norm_eq_zero {g : α} : ∥g∥ = 0 ↔ g = 0 :=
dist_zero_right g ▸ dist_eq_zero
@[simp] lemma norm_zero : ∥(0:α)∥ = 0 := norm_eq_zero.2 rfl
lemma norm_sum_le {β} : ∀(s : finset β) (f : β → α), ∥∑ a in s, f a∥ ≤ ∑ a in s, ∥ f a ∥ :=
finset.le_sum_of_subadditive norm norm_zero norm_add_le
lemma norm_sum_le_of_le {β} (s : finset β) {f : β → α} {n : β → ℝ} (h : ∀ b ∈ s, ∥f b∥ ≤ n b) :
∥∑ b in s, f b∥ ≤ ∑ b in s, n b :=
le_trans (norm_sum_le s f) (finset.sum_le_sum h)
lemma norm_pos_iff {g : α} : 0 < ∥ g ∥ ↔ g ≠ 0 :=
dist_zero_right g ▸ dist_pos
lemma norm_le_zero_iff {g : α} : ∥g∥ ≤ 0 ↔ g = 0 :=
by { rw[←dist_zero_right], exact dist_le_zero }
lemma norm_sub_le (g h : α) : ∥g - h∥ ≤ ∥g∥ + ∥h∥ :=
by simpa [dist_eq_norm] using dist_triangle g 0 h
lemma norm_sub_le_of_le {g₁ g₂ : α} {n₁ n₂ : ℝ} (H₁ : ∥g₁∥ ≤ n₁) (H₂ : ∥g₂∥ ≤ n₂) :
∥g₁ - g₂∥ ≤ n₁ + n₂ :=
le_trans (norm_sub_le g₁ g₂) (add_le_add H₁ H₂)
lemma dist_le_norm_add_norm (g h : α) : dist g h ≤ ∥g∥ + ∥h∥ :=
by { rw dist_eq_norm, apply norm_sub_le }
lemma abs_norm_sub_norm_le (g h : α) : abs(∥g∥ - ∥h∥) ≤ ∥g - h∥ :=
by simpa [dist_eq_norm] using abs_dist_sub_le g h 0
lemma norm_sub_norm_le (g h : α) : ∥g∥ - ∥h∥ ≤ ∥g - h∥ :=
le_trans (le_abs_self _) (abs_norm_sub_norm_le g h)
lemma dist_norm_norm_le (g h : α) : dist ∥g∥ ∥h∥ ≤ ∥g - h∥ :=
abs_norm_sub_norm_le g h
lemma eq_of_norm_sub_eq_zero {u v : α} (h : ∥u - v∥ = 0) : u = v :=
begin
apply eq_of_dist_eq_zero,
rwa dist_eq_norm
end
lemma norm_le_insert (u v : α) : ∥v∥ ≤ ∥u∥ + ∥u - v∥ :=
calc ∥v∥ = ∥u - (u - v)∥ : by abel
... ≤ ∥u∥ + ∥u - v∥ : norm_sub_le u _
lemma ball_0_eq (ε : ℝ) : ball (0:α) ε = {x | ∥x∥ < ε} :=
set.ext $ assume a, by simp
lemma norm_le_of_mem_closed_ball {g h : α} {r : ℝ} (H : h ∈ closed_ball g r) :
∥h∥ ≤ ∥g∥ + r :=
calc
∥h∥ = ∥g + (h - g)∥ : by rw [add_sub_cancel'_right]
... ≤ ∥g∥ + ∥h - g∥ : norm_add_le _ _
... ≤ ∥g∥ + r : by { apply add_le_add_left, rw ← dist_eq_norm, exact H }
lemma norm_lt_of_mem_ball {g h : α} {r : ℝ} (H : h ∈ ball g r) :
∥h∥ < ∥g∥ + r :=
calc
∥h∥ = ∥g + (h - g)∥ : by rw [add_sub_cancel'_right]
... ≤ ∥g∥ + ∥h - g∥ : norm_add_le _ _
... < ∥g∥ + r : by { apply add_lt_add_left, rw ← dist_eq_norm, exact H }
theorem normed_group.tendsto_nhds_zero {f : γ → α} {l : filter γ} :
tendsto f l (𝓝 0) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in l, ∥ f x ∥ < ε :=
metric.tendsto_nhds.trans $ by simp only [dist_zero_right]
lemma normed_group.tendsto_nhds_nhds {f : α → β} {x : α} {y : β} :
tendsto f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x', ∥x' - x∥ < δ → ∥f x' - y∥ < ε :=
by simp_rw [metric.tendsto_nhds_nhds, dist_eq_norm]
/-- A homomorphism `f` of normed groups is Lipschitz, if there exists a constant `C` such that for
all `x`, one has `∥f x∥ ≤ C * ∥x∥`.
The analogous condition for a linear map of normed spaces is in `normed_space.operator_norm`. -/
lemma add_monoid_hom.lipschitz_of_bound (f :α →+ β) (C : ℝ) (h : ∀x, ∥f x∥ ≤ C * ∥x∥) :
lipschitz_with (nnreal.of_real C) f :=
lipschitz_with.of_dist_le' $ λ x y, by simpa only [dist_eq_norm, f.map_sub] using h (x - y)
lemma lipschitz_on_with_iff_norm_sub_le {f : α → β} {C : ℝ≥0} {s : set α} :
lipschitz_on_with C f s ↔ ∀ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), ∥f x - f y∥ ≤ C * ∥x - y∥ :=
by simp only [lipschitz_on_with_iff_dist_le_mul, dist_eq_norm]
lemma lipschitz_on_with.norm_sub_le {f : α → β} {C : ℝ≥0} {s : set α} (h : lipschitz_on_with C f s)
{x y : α} (x_in : x ∈ s) (y_in : y ∈ s) : ∥f x - f y∥ ≤ C * ∥x - y∥ :=
lipschitz_on_with_iff_norm_sub_le.mp h x x_in y y_in
/-- A homomorphism `f` of normed groups is continuous, if there exists a constant `C` such that for
all `x`, one has `∥f x∥ ≤ C * ∥x∥`.
The analogous condition for a linear map of normed spaces is in `normed_space.operator_norm`. -/
lemma add_monoid_hom.continuous_of_bound (f :α →+ β) (C : ℝ) (h : ∀x, ∥f x∥ ≤ C * ∥x∥) :
continuous f :=
(f.lipschitz_of_bound C h).continuous
section nnnorm
/-- Version of the norm taking values in nonnegative reals. -/
def nnnorm (a : α) : nnreal := ⟨norm a, norm_nonneg a⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_nnnorm (a : α) : (nnnorm a : ℝ) = norm a := rfl
lemma nndist_eq_nnnorm (a b : α) : nndist a b = nnnorm (a - b) := nnreal.eq $ dist_eq_norm _ _
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_eq_zero {a : α} : nnnorm a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
by simp only [nnreal.eq_iff.symm, nnreal.coe_zero, coe_nnnorm, norm_eq_zero]
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_zero : nnnorm (0 : α) = 0 :=
nnreal.eq norm_zero
lemma nnnorm_add_le (g h : α) : nnnorm (g + h) ≤ nnnorm g + nnnorm h :=
nnreal.coe_le_coe.2 $ norm_add_le g h
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_neg (g : α) : nnnorm (-g) = nnnorm g :=
nnreal.eq $ norm_neg g
lemma nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le (g h : α) : nndist (nnnorm g) (nnnorm h) ≤ nnnorm (g - h) :=
nnreal.coe_le_coe.2 $ dist_norm_norm_le g h
lemma of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm (x : β) : ennreal.of_real ∥x∥ = (nnnorm x : ennreal) :=
ennreal.of_real_eq_coe_nnreal _
lemma edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_sub (x y : β) : edist x y = (nnnorm (x - y) : ennreal) :=
by rw [edist_dist, dist_eq_norm, of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
lemma edist_eq_coe_nnnorm (x : β) : edist x 0 = (nnnorm x : ennreal) :=
by rw [edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_sub, _root_.sub_zero]
lemma nndist_add_add_le (g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂ : α) :
nndist (g₁ + g₂) (h₁ + h₂) ≤ nndist g₁ h₁ + nndist g₂ h₂ :=
nnreal.coe_le_coe.2 $ dist_add_add_le g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂
lemma edist_add_add_le (g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂ : α) :
edist (g₁ + g₂) (h₁ + h₂) ≤ edist g₁ h₁ + edist g₂ h₂ :=
by { simp only [edist_nndist], norm_cast, apply nndist_add_add_le }
lemma nnnorm_sum_le {β} : ∀(s : finset β) (f : β → α), nnnorm (∑ a in s, f a) ≤ ∑ a in s, nnnorm (f a) :=
finset.le_sum_of_subadditive nnnorm nnnorm_zero nnnorm_add_le
end nnnorm
lemma lipschitz_with.neg {α : Type*} [emetric_space α] {K : nnreal} {f : α → β}
(hf : lipschitz_with K f) : lipschitz_with K (λ x, -f x) :=
λ x y, by simpa only [edist_dist, dist_neg_neg] using hf x y
lemma lipschitz_with.add {α : Type*} [emetric_space α] {Kf : nnreal} {f : α → β}
(hf : lipschitz_with Kf f) {Kg : nnreal} {g : α → β} (hg : lipschitz_with Kg g) :
lipschitz_with (Kf + Kg) (λ x, f x + g x) :=
λ x y,
calc edist (f x + g x) (f y + g y) ≤ edist (f x) (f y) + edist (g x) (g y) :
edist_add_add_le _ _ _ _
... ≤ Kf * edist x y + Kg * edist x y :
add_le_add (hf x y) (hg x y)
... = (Kf + Kg) * edist x y :
(add_mul _ _ _).symm
lemma lipschitz_with.sub {α : Type*} [emetric_space α] {Kf : nnreal} {f : α → β}
(hf : lipschitz_with Kf f) {Kg : nnreal} {g : α → β} (hg : lipschitz_with Kg g) :
lipschitz_with (Kf + Kg) (λ x, f x - g x) :=
hf.add hg.neg
lemma antilipschitz_with.add_lipschitz_with {α : Type*} [metric_space α] {Kf : nnreal} {f : α → β}
(hf : antilipschitz_with Kf f) {Kg : nnreal} {g : α → β} (hg : lipschitz_with Kg g)
(hK : Kg < Kf⁻¹) :
antilipschitz_with (Kf⁻¹ - Kg)⁻¹ (λ x, f x + g x) :=
begin
refine antilipschitz_with.of_le_mul_dist (λ x y, _),
rw [nnreal.coe_inv, ← div_eq_inv_mul],
rw le_div_iff (nnreal.coe_pos.2 $ nnreal.sub_pos.2 hK),
rw [mul_comm, nnreal.coe_sub (le_of_lt hK), sub_mul],
calc ↑Kf⁻¹ * dist x y - Kg * dist x y ≤ dist (f x) (f y) - dist (g x) (g y) :
sub_le_sub (hf.mul_le_dist x y) (hg.dist_le_mul x y)
... ≤ _ : le_trans (le_abs_self _) (abs_dist_sub_le_dist_add_add _ _ _ _)
end
/-- A submodule of a normed group is also a normed group, with the restriction of the norm.
As all instances can be inferred from the submodule `s`, they are put as implicit instead of
typeclasses. -/
instance submodule.normed_group {𝕜 : Type*} {_ : ring 𝕜}
{E : Type*} [normed_group E] {_ : module 𝕜 E} (s : submodule 𝕜 E) : normed_group s :=
{ norm := λx, norm (x : E),
dist_eq := λx y, dist_eq_norm (x : E) (y : E) }
/-- normed group instance on the product of two normed groups, using the sup norm. -/
instance prod.normed_group : normed_group (α × β) :=
{ norm := λx, max ∥x.1∥ ∥x.2∥,
dist_eq := assume (x y : α × β),
show max (dist x.1 y.1) (dist x.2 y.2) = (max ∥(x - y).1∥ ∥(x - y).2∥), by simp [dist_eq_norm] }
lemma prod.norm_def (x : α × β) : ∥x∥ = (max ∥x.1∥ ∥x.2∥) := rfl
lemma norm_fst_le (x : α × β) : ∥x.1∥ ≤ ∥x∥ :=
le_max_left _ _
lemma norm_snd_le (x : α × β) : ∥x.2∥ ≤ ∥x∥ :=
le_max_right _ _
lemma norm_prod_le_iff {x : α × β} {r : ℝ} :
∥x∥ ≤ r ↔ ∥x.1∥ ≤ r ∧ ∥x.2∥ ≤ r :=
max_le_iff
/-- normed group instance on the product of finitely many normed groups, using the sup norm. -/
instance pi.normed_group {π : ι → Type*} [fintype ι] [∀i, normed_group (π i)] :
normed_group (Πi, π i) :=
{ norm := λf, ((finset.sup finset.univ (λ b, nnnorm (f b)) : nnreal) : ℝ),
dist_eq := assume x y,
congr_arg (coe : nnreal → ℝ) $ congr_arg (finset.sup finset.univ) $ funext $ assume a,
show nndist (x a) (y a) = nnnorm (x a - y a), from nndist_eq_nnnorm _ _ }
/-- The norm of an element in a product space is `≤ r` if and only if the norm of each
component is. -/
lemma pi_norm_le_iff {π : ι → Type*} [fintype ι] [∀i, normed_group (π i)] {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r)
{x : Πi, π i} : ∥x∥ ≤ r ↔ ∀i, ∥x i∥ ≤ r :=
by { simp only [(dist_zero_right _).symm, dist_pi_le_iff hr], refl }
lemma norm_le_pi_norm {π : ι → Type*} [fintype ι] [∀i, normed_group (π i)] (x : Πi, π i) (i : ι) :
∥x i∥ ≤ ∥x∥ :=
(pi_norm_le_iff (norm_nonneg x)).1 (le_refl _) i
lemma tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero {f : ι → β} {a : filter ι} {b : β} :
tendsto f a (𝓝 b) ↔ tendsto (λ e, ∥ f e - b ∥) a (𝓝 0) :=
by rw tendsto_iff_dist_tendsto_zero ; simp only [(dist_eq_norm _ _).symm]
lemma tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero {f : γ → β} {a : filter γ} :
tendsto f a (𝓝 0) ↔ tendsto (λ e, ∥ f e ∥) a (𝓝 0) :=
have tendsto f a (𝓝 0) ↔ tendsto (λ e, ∥ f e - 0 ∥) a (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero,
by simpa
/-- Special case of the sandwich theorem: if the norm of `f` is eventually bounded by a real
function `g` which tends to `0`, then `f` tends to `0`.
In this pair of lemmas (`squeeze_zero_norm'` and `squeeze_zero_norm`), following a convention of
similar lemmas in `topology.metric_space.basic` and `topology.algebra.ordered`, the `'` version is
phrased using "eventually" and the non-`'` version is phrased absolutely. -/
lemma squeeze_zero_norm' {f : γ → α} {g : γ → ℝ} {t₀ : filter γ}
(h : ∀ᶠ n in t₀, ∥f n∥ ≤ g n)
(h' : tendsto g t₀ (𝓝 0)) : tendsto f t₀ (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.mpr
(squeeze_zero' (eventually_of_forall (λ n, norm_nonneg _)) h h')
/-- Special case of the sandwich theorem: if the norm of `f` is bounded by a real function `g` which
tends to `0`, then `f` tends to `0`. -/
lemma squeeze_zero_norm {f : γ → α} {g : γ → ℝ} {t₀ : filter γ}
(h : ∀ (n:γ), ∥f n∥ ≤ g n)
(h' : tendsto g t₀ (𝓝 0)) :
tendsto f t₀ (𝓝 0) :=
squeeze_zero_norm' (eventually_of_forall h) h'
lemma lim_norm (x : α) : (λg:α, ∥g - x∥) →_{x} 0 :=
tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.1 (continuous_iff_continuous_at.1 continuous_id x)
lemma lim_norm_zero : (λg:α, ∥g∥) →_{0} 0 :=
by simpa using lim_norm (0:α)
lemma continuous_norm : continuous (λg:α, ∥g∥) :=
begin
rw continuous_iff_continuous_at,
intro x,
rw [continuous_at, tendsto_iff_dist_tendsto_zero],
exact squeeze_zero (λ t, abs_nonneg _) (λ t, abs_norm_sub_norm_le _ _) (lim_norm x)
end
lemma filter.tendsto.norm {β : Type*} {l : filter β} {f : β → α} {a : α} (h : tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) :
tendsto (λ x, ∥f x∥) l (𝓝 ∥a∥) :=
tendsto.comp continuous_norm.continuous_at h
lemma continuous_nnnorm : continuous (nnnorm : α → nnreal) :=
continuous_subtype_mk _ continuous_norm
lemma filter.tendsto.nnnorm {β : Type*} {l : filter β} {f : β → α} {a : α} (h : tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) :
tendsto (λ x, nnnorm (f x)) l (𝓝 (nnnorm a)) :=
tendsto.comp continuous_nnnorm.continuous_at h
/-- If `∥y∥→∞`, then we can assume `y≠x` for any fixed `x`. -/
lemma eventually_ne_of_tendsto_norm_at_top {l : filter γ} {f : γ → α}
(h : tendsto (λ y, ∥f y∥) l at_top) (x : α) :
∀ᶠ y in l, f y ≠ x :=
begin
have : ∀ᶠ y in l, 1 + ∥x∥ ≤ ∥f y∥ := h (mem_at_top (1 + ∥x∥)),
refine this.mono (λ y hy hxy, _),
subst x,
exact not_le_of_lt zero_lt_one (add_le_iff_nonpos_left.1 hy)
end
/-- A normed group is a uniform additive group, i.e., addition and subtraction are uniformly
continuous. -/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_uniform_group : uniform_add_group α :=
begin
refine ⟨metric.uniform_continuous_iff.2 $ assume ε hε, ⟨ε / 2, half_pos hε, assume a b h, _⟩⟩,
rw [prod.dist_eq, max_lt_iff, dist_eq_norm, dist_eq_norm] at h,
calc dist (a.1 - a.2) (b.1 - b.2) = ∥(a.1 - b.1) - (a.2 - b.2)∥ :
by simp [dist_eq_norm, sub_eq_add_neg]; abel
... ≤ ∥a.1 - b.1∥ + ∥a.2 - b.2∥ : norm_sub_le _ _
... < ε / 2 + ε / 2 : add_lt_add h.1 h.2
... = ε : add_halves _
end
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_top_monoid : has_continuous_add α := by apply_instance -- short-circuit type class inference
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_top_group : topological_add_group α := by apply_instance -- short-circuit type class inference
end normed_group
section normed_ring
/-- A normed ring is a ring endowed with a norm which satisfies the inequality `∥x y∥ ≤ ∥x∥ ∥y∥`. -/
class normed_ring (α : Type*) extends has_norm α, ring α, metric_space α :=
(dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = norm (x - y))
(norm_mul : ∀ a b, norm (a * b) ≤ norm a * norm b)
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_ring.to_normed_group [β : normed_ring α] : normed_group α := { ..β }
lemma norm_mul_le {α : Type*} [normed_ring α] (a b : α) : (∥a*b∥) ≤ (∥a∥) * (∥b∥) :=
normed_ring.norm_mul _ _
lemma norm_pow_le {α : Type*} [normed_ring α] (a : α) : ∀ {n : ℕ}, 0 < n → ∥a^n∥ ≤ ∥a∥^n
| 1 h := by simp
| (n+2) h :=
le_trans (norm_mul_le a (a^(n+1)))
(mul_le_mul (le_refl _)
(norm_pow_le (nat.succ_pos _)) (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _))
lemma eventually_norm_pow_le {α : Type*} [normed_ring α] (a : α) :
∀ᶠ (n:ℕ) in at_top, ∥a ^ n∥ ≤ ∥a∥ ^ n :=
begin
refine eventually_at_top.mpr ⟨1, _⟩,
intros b h,
exact norm_pow_le a (nat.succ_le_iff.mp h),
end
lemma units.norm_pos {α : Type*} [normed_ring α] [nontrivial α] (x : units α) : 0 < ∥(x:α)∥ :=
norm_pos_iff.mpr (units.ne_zero x)
/-- In a normed ring, the left-multiplication `add_monoid_hom` is bounded. -/
lemma mul_left_bound {α : Type*} [normed_ring α] (x : α) :
∀ (y:α), ∥add_monoid_hom.mul_left x y∥ ≤ ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ :=
norm_mul_le x
/-- In a normed ring, the right-multiplication `add_monoid_hom` is bounded. -/
lemma mul_right_bound {α : Type*} [normed_ring α] (x : α) :
∀ (y:α), ∥add_monoid_hom.mul_right x y∥ ≤ ∥x∥ * ∥y∥ :=
λ y, by {rw mul_comm, convert norm_mul_le y x}
/-- Normed ring structure on the product of two normed rings, using the sup norm. -/
instance prod.normed_ring [normed_ring α] [normed_ring β] : normed_ring (α × β) :=
{ norm_mul := assume x y,
calc
∥x * y∥ = ∥(x.1*y.1, x.2*y.2)∥ : rfl
... = (max ∥x.1*y.1∥ ∥x.2*y.2∥) : rfl
... ≤ (max (∥x.1∥*∥y.1∥) (∥x.2∥*∥y.2∥)) :
max_le_max (norm_mul_le (x.1) (y.1)) (norm_mul_le (x.2) (y.2))
... = (max (∥x.1∥*∥y.1∥) (∥y.2∥*∥x.2∥)) : by simp[mul_comm]
... ≤ (max (∥x.1∥) (∥x.2∥)) * (max (∥y.2∥) (∥y.1∥)) : by { apply max_mul_mul_le_max_mul_max; simp [norm_nonneg] }
... = (max (∥x.1∥) (∥x.2∥)) * (max (∥y.1∥) (∥y.2∥)) : by simp[max_comm]
... = (∥x∥*∥y∥) : rfl,
..prod.normed_group }
end normed_ring
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_ring_top_monoid [normed_ring α] : has_continuous_mul α :=
⟨ continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $ λ x, tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.2 $
have ∀ e : α × α, e.fst * e.snd - x.fst * x.snd =
e.fst * e.snd - e.fst * x.snd + (e.fst * x.snd - x.fst * x.snd), by intro; rw sub_add_sub_cancel,
begin
apply squeeze_zero,
{ intro, apply norm_nonneg },
{ simp only [this], intro, apply norm_add_le },
{ rw ←zero_add (0 : ℝ), apply tendsto.add,
{ apply squeeze_zero,
{ intro, apply norm_nonneg },
{ intro t, show ∥t.fst * t.snd - t.fst * x.snd∥ ≤ ∥t.fst∥ * ∥t.snd - x.snd∥,
rw ←mul_sub, apply norm_mul_le },
{ rw ←mul_zero (∥x.fst∥), apply tendsto.mul,
{ apply continuous_iff_continuous_at.1,
apply continuous_norm.comp continuous_fst },
{ apply tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.1,
apply continuous_iff_continuous_at.1,
apply continuous_snd }}},
{ apply squeeze_zero,
{ intro, apply norm_nonneg },
{ intro t, show ∥t.fst * x.snd - x.fst * x.snd∥ ≤ ∥t.fst - x.fst∥ * ∥x.snd∥,
rw ←sub_mul, apply norm_mul_le },
{ rw ←zero_mul (∥x.snd∥), apply tendsto.mul,
{ apply tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.1,
apply continuous_iff_continuous_at.1,
apply continuous_fst },
{ apply tendsto_const_nhds }}}}
end ⟩
/-- A normed ring is a topological ring. -/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_top_ring [normed_ring α] : topological_ring α :=
⟨ continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $ λ x, tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.2 $
have ∀ e : α, -e - -x = -(e - x), by intro; simp,
by simp only [this, norm_neg]; apply lim_norm ⟩
/-- A normed field is a field with a norm satisfying ∥x y∥ = ∥x∥ ∥y∥. -/
class normed_field (α : Type*) extends has_norm α, field α, metric_space α :=
(dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = norm (x - y))
(norm_mul' : ∀ a b, norm (a * b) = norm a * norm b)
/-- A nondiscrete normed field is a normed field in which there is an element of norm different from
`0` and `1`. This makes it possible to bring any element arbitrarily close to `0` by multiplication
by the powers of any element, and thus to relate algebra and topology. -/
class nondiscrete_normed_field (α : Type*) extends normed_field α :=
(non_trivial : ∃x:α, 1<∥x∥)
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_field.to_normed_ring [i : normed_field α] : normed_ring α :=
{ norm_mul := by finish [i.norm_mul'], ..i }
namespace normed_field
@[simp] lemma norm_one {α : Type*} [normed_field α] : ∥(1 : α)∥ = 1 :=
have ∥(1 : α)∥ * ∥(1 : α)∥ = ∥(1 : α)∥ * 1, by calc
∥(1 : α)∥ * ∥(1 : α)∥ = ∥(1 : α) * (1 : α)∥ : by rw normed_field.norm_mul'
... = ∥(1 : α)∥ * 1 : by simp,
mul_left_cancel' (ne_of_gt (norm_pos_iff.2 (by simp))) this
@[simp] lemma norm_mul [normed_field α] (a b : α) : ∥a * b∥ = ∥a∥ * ∥b∥ :=
normed_field.norm_mul' a b
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_one [normed_field α] : nnnorm (1:α) = 1 := nnreal.eq $ by simp
instance normed_field.is_monoid_hom_norm [normed_field α] : is_monoid_hom (norm : α → ℝ) :=
{ map_one := norm_one, map_mul := norm_mul }
@[simp] lemma norm_pow [normed_field α] (a : α) : ∀ (n : ℕ), ∥a^n∥ = ∥a∥^n :=
is_monoid_hom.map_pow norm a
@[simp] lemma norm_prod {β : Type*} [normed_field α] (s : finset β) (f : β → α) :
∥∏ b in s, f b∥ = ∏ b in s, ∥f b∥ :=
eq.symm (s.prod_hom norm)
@[simp] lemma norm_div {α : Type*} [normed_field α] (a b : α) : ∥a/b∥ = ∥a∥/∥b∥ :=
begin
classical,
by_cases hb : b = 0, {simp [hb]},
apply eq_div_of_mul_eq,
{ apply ne_of_gt, apply norm_pos_iff.mpr hb },
{ rw [←normed_field.norm_mul, div_mul_cancel _ hb] }
end
@[simp] lemma norm_inv {α : Type*} [normed_field α] (a : α) : ∥a⁻¹∥ = ∥a∥⁻¹ :=
by simp only [inv_eq_one_div, norm_div, norm_one]
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_inv {α : Type*} [normed_field α] (a : α) : nnnorm (a⁻¹) = (nnnorm a)⁻¹ :=
nnreal.eq $ by simp
@[simp] lemma norm_fpow {α : Type*} [normed_field α] (a : α) : ∀n : ℤ,
∥a^n∥ = ∥a∥^n
| (n : ℕ) := norm_pow a n
| -[1+ n] := by simp [fpow_neg_succ_of_nat]
lemma exists_one_lt_norm (α : Type*) [i : nondiscrete_normed_field α] : ∃x : α, 1 < ∥x∥ :=
i.non_trivial
lemma exists_norm_lt_one (α : Type*) [nondiscrete_normed_field α] : ∃x : α, 0 < ∥x∥ ∧ ∥x∥ < 1 :=
begin
rcases exists_one_lt_norm α with ⟨y, hy⟩,
refine ⟨y⁻¹, _, _⟩,
{ simp only [inv_eq_zero, ne.def, norm_pos_iff],
assume h,
rw ← norm_eq_zero at h,
rw h at hy,
exact lt_irrefl _ (lt_trans zero_lt_one hy) },
{ simp [inv_lt_one hy] }
end
lemma exists_lt_norm (α : Type*) [nondiscrete_normed_field α]
(r : ℝ) : ∃ x : α, r < ∥x∥ :=
let ⟨w, hw⟩ := exists_one_lt_norm α in
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := pow_unbounded_of_one_lt r hw in
⟨w^n, by rwa norm_pow⟩
lemma exists_norm_lt (α : Type*) [nondiscrete_normed_field α]
{r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : ∃ x : α, 0 < ∥x∥ ∧ ∥x∥ < r :=
let ⟨w, hw⟩ := exists_one_lt_norm α in
let ⟨n, hle, hlt⟩ := exists_int_pow_near' hr hw in
⟨w^n, by { rw norm_fpow; exact fpow_pos_of_pos (lt_trans zero_lt_one hw) _},
by rwa norm_fpow⟩
@[instance]
lemma punctured_nhds_ne_bot {α : Type*} [nondiscrete_normed_field α] (x : α) :
ne_bot (𝓝[{x}ᶜ] x) :=
begin
rw [← mem_closure_iff_nhds_within_ne_bot, metric.mem_closure_iff],
rintros ε ε0,
rcases normed_field.exists_norm_lt α ε0 with ⟨b, hb0, hbε⟩,
refine ⟨x + b, mt (set.mem_singleton_iff.trans add_right_eq_self).1 $ norm_pos_iff.1 hb0, _⟩,
rwa [dist_comm, dist_eq_norm, add_sub_cancel'],
end
@[instance]
lemma nhds_within_is_unit_ne_bot {α : Type*} [nondiscrete_normed_field α] :
ne_bot (𝓝[{x : α | is_unit x}] 0) :=
by simpa only [is_unit_iff_ne_zero] using punctured_nhds_ne_bot (0:α)
lemma tendsto_inv [normed_field α] {r : α} (r0 : r ≠ 0) : tendsto (λq, q⁻¹) (𝓝 r) (𝓝 r⁻¹) :=
begin
refine (nhds_basis_closed_ball.tendsto_iff nhds_basis_closed_ball).2 (λε εpos, _),
let δ := min (ε/2 * ∥r∥^2) (∥r∥/2),
have norm_r_pos : 0 < ∥r∥ := norm_pos_iff.mpr r0,
have A : 0 < ε / 2 * ∥r∥ ^ 2 := mul_pos (half_pos εpos) (pow_pos norm_r_pos 2),
have δpos : 0 < δ, by simp [half_pos norm_r_pos, A],
refine ⟨δ, δpos, λ x hx, _⟩,
have rx : ∥r∥/2 ≤ ∥x∥ := calc
∥r∥/2 = ∥r∥ - ∥r∥/2 : by ring
... ≤ ∥r∥ - ∥r - x∥ :
begin
apply sub_le_sub (le_refl _),
rw [← dist_eq_norm, dist_comm],
exact le_trans hx (min_le_right _ _)
end
... ≤ ∥r - (r - x)∥ : norm_sub_norm_le r (r - x)
... = ∥x∥ : by simp [sub_sub_cancel],
have norm_x_pos : 0 < ∥x∥ := lt_of_lt_of_le (half_pos norm_r_pos) rx,
have : x⁻¹ - r⁻¹ = (r - x) * x⁻¹ * r⁻¹,
by rw [sub_mul, sub_mul, mul_inv_cancel (norm_pos_iff.mp norm_x_pos), one_mul, mul_comm,
← mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel r0, one_mul],
calc dist x⁻¹ r⁻¹ = ∥x⁻¹ - r⁻¹∥ : dist_eq_norm _ _
... ≤ ∥r-x∥ * ∥x∥⁻¹ * ∥r∥⁻¹ : by rw [this, norm_mul, norm_mul, norm_inv, norm_inv]
... ≤ (ε/2 * ∥r∥^2) * (2 * ∥r∥⁻¹) * (∥r∥⁻¹) : begin
apply_rules [mul_le_mul, inv_nonneg.2, le_of_lt A, norm_nonneg, mul_nonneg,
(inv_le_inv norm_x_pos norm_r_pos).2, le_refl],
show ∥r - x∥ ≤ ε / 2 * ∥r∥ ^ 2,
by { rw [← dist_eq_norm, dist_comm], exact le_trans hx (min_le_left _ _) },
show ∥x∥⁻¹ ≤ 2 * ∥r∥⁻¹,
{ convert (inv_le_inv norm_x_pos (half_pos norm_r_pos)).2 rx,
rw [inv_div, div_eq_inv_mul, mul_comm] },
show (0 : ℝ) ≤ 2, by norm_num
end
... = ε * (∥r∥ * ∥r∥⁻¹)^2 : by { generalize : ∥r∥⁻¹ = u, ring }
... = ε : by { rw [mul_inv_cancel (ne.symm (ne_of_lt norm_r_pos))], simp }
end
lemma continuous_on_inv [normed_field α] : continuous_on (λ(x:α), x⁻¹) {x | x ≠ 0} :=
begin
assume x hx,
apply continuous_at.continuous_within_at,
exact (tendsto_inv hx)
end
end normed_field
instance : normed_field ℝ :=
{ norm := λ x, abs x,
dist_eq := assume x y, rfl,
norm_mul' := abs_mul }
instance : nondiscrete_normed_field ℝ :=
{ non_trivial := ⟨2, by { unfold norm, rw abs_of_nonneg; norm_num }⟩ }
/-- If a function converges to a nonzero value, its inverse converges to the inverse of this value.
We use the name `tendsto.inv'` as `tendsto.inv` is already used in multiplicative topological
groups. -/
lemma filter.tendsto.inv' [normed_field α] {l : filter β} {f : β → α} {y : α}
(hy : y ≠ 0) (h : tendsto f l (𝓝 y)) :
tendsto (λx, (f x)⁻¹) l (𝓝 y⁻¹) :=
(normed_field.tendsto_inv hy).comp h
lemma filter.tendsto.div [normed_field α] {l : filter β} {f g : β → α} {x y : α}
(hf : tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (hg : tendsto g l (𝓝 y)) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
tendsto (λa, f a / g a) l (𝓝 (x / y)) :=
hf.mul (hg.inv' hy)
lemma filter.tendsto.div_const [normed_field α] {l : filter β} {f : β → α} {x y : α}
(hf : tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) : tendsto (λa, f a / y) l (𝓝 (x / y)) :=
by { simp only [div_eq_inv_mul], exact tendsto_const_nhds.mul hf }
/-- Continuity at a point of the result of dividing two functions
continuous at that point, where the denominator is nonzero. -/
lemma continuous_at.div [topological_space α] [normed_field β] {f : α → β} {g : α → β} {x : α}
(hf : continuous_at f x) (hg : continuous_at g x) (hnz : g x ≠ 0) :
continuous_at (λ x, f x / g x) x :=
hf.div hg hnz
namespace real
lemma norm_eq_abs (r : ℝ) : ∥r∥ = abs r := rfl
@[simp] lemma norm_coe_nat (n : ℕ) : ∥(n : ℝ)∥ = n := abs_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_coe_nat (n : ℕ) : nnnorm (n : ℝ) = n := nnreal.eq $ by simp
@[simp] lemma norm_two : ∥(2:ℝ)∥ = 2 := abs_of_pos (@two_pos ℝ _)
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_two : nnnorm (2:ℝ) = 2 := nnreal.eq $ by simp
open_locale nnreal
@[simp] lemma nnreal.norm_eq (x : ℝ≥0) : ∥(x : ℝ)∥ = x :=
by rw [real.norm_eq_abs, x.abs_eq]
end real
@[simp] lemma norm_norm [normed_group α] (x : α) : ∥∥x∥∥ = ∥x∥ :=
by rw [real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _)]
@[simp] lemma nnnorm_norm [normed_group α] (a : α) : nnnorm ∥a∥ = nnnorm a :=
by simp only [nnnorm, norm_norm]
instance : normed_ring ℤ :=
{ norm := λ n, ∥(n : ℝ)∥,
norm_mul := λ m n, le_of_eq $ by simp only [norm, int.cast_mul, abs_mul],
dist_eq := λ m n, by simp only [int.dist_eq, norm, int.cast_sub] }
@[norm_cast] lemma int.norm_cast_real (m : ℤ) : ∥(m : ℝ)∥ = ∥m∥ := rfl
instance : normed_field ℚ :=
{ norm := λ r, ∥(r : ℝ)∥,
norm_mul' := λ r₁ r₂, by simp only [norm, rat.cast_mul, abs_mul],
dist_eq := λ r₁ r₂, by simp only [rat.dist_eq, norm, rat.cast_sub] }
instance : nondiscrete_normed_field ℚ :=
{ non_trivial := ⟨2, by { unfold norm, rw abs_of_nonneg; norm_num }⟩ }
@[norm_cast, simp] lemma rat.norm_cast_real (r : ℚ) : ∥(r : ℝ)∥ = ∥r∥ := rfl
@[norm_cast, simp] lemma int.norm_cast_rat (m : ℤ) : ∥(m : ℚ)∥ = ∥m∥ :=
by rw [← rat.norm_cast_real, ← int.norm_cast_real]; congr' 1; norm_cast
section normed_space
section prio
set_option extends_priority 920
-- Here, we set a rather high priority for the instance `[normed_space α β] : semimodule α β`
-- to take precedence over `semiring.to_semimodule` as this leads to instance paths with better
-- unification properties.
-- see Note[vector space definition] for why we extend `semimodule`.
/-- A normed space over a normed field is a vector space endowed with a norm which satisfies the
equality `∥c • x∥ = ∥c∥ ∥x∥`. We require only `∥c • x∥ ≤ ∥c∥ ∥x∥` in the definition, then prove
`∥c • x∥ = ∥c∥ ∥x∥` in `norm_smul`. -/
class normed_space (α : Type*) (β : Type*) [normed_field α] [normed_group β]
extends semimodule α β :=
(norm_smul_le : ∀ (a:α) (b:β), ∥a • b∥ ≤ ∥a∥ * ∥b∥)
end prio
variables [normed_field α] [normed_group β]
instance normed_field.to_normed_space : normed_space α α :=
{ norm_smul_le := λ a b, le_of_eq (normed_field.norm_mul a b) }
lemma norm_smul [normed_space α β] (s : α) (x : β) : ∥s • x∥ = ∥s∥ * ∥x∥ :=
begin
classical,
by_cases h : s = 0,
{ simp [h] },
{ refine le_antisymm (normed_space.norm_smul_le s x) _,
calc ∥s∥ * ∥x∥ = ∥s∥ * ∥s⁻¹ • s • x∥ : by rw [inv_smul_smul' h]
... ≤ ∥s∥ * (∥s⁻¹∥ * ∥s • x∥) : _
... = ∥s • x∥ : _,
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (normed_space.norm_smul_le _ _) (norm_nonneg _),
rw [normed_field.norm_inv, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel, one_mul],
rwa [ne.def, norm_eq_zero] }
end
lemma dist_smul [normed_space α β] (s : α) (x y : β) : dist (s • x) (s • y) = ∥s∥ * dist x y :=
by simp only [dist_eq_norm, (norm_smul _ _).symm, smul_sub]
lemma nnnorm_smul [normed_space α β] (s : α) (x : β) : nnnorm (s • x) = nnnorm s * nnnorm x :=
nnreal.eq $ norm_smul s x
lemma nndist_smul [normed_space α β] (s : α) (x y : β) :
nndist (s • x) (s • y) = nnnorm s * nndist x y :=
nnreal.eq $ dist_smul s x y
lemma norm_smul_of_nonneg [normed_space ℝ β] {t : ℝ} (ht : 0 ≤ t) (x : β) : ∥t • x∥ = t * ∥x∥ :=
by rw [norm_smul, real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg ht]
variables {E : Type*} {F : Type*}
[normed_group E] [normed_space α E] [normed_group F] [normed_space α F]
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance normed_space.topological_vector_space : topological_vector_space α E :=
begin
refine { continuous_smul := continuous_iff_continuous_at.2 $
λ p, tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.2 _ },
refine squeeze_zero (λ _, norm_nonneg _) _ _,
{ exact λ q, ∥q.1 - p.1∥ * ∥q.2∥ + ∥p.1∥ * ∥q.2 - p.2∥ },
{ intro q,
rw [← sub_add_sub_cancel, ← norm_smul, ← norm_smul, smul_sub, sub_smul],
exact norm_add_le _ _ },
{ conv { congr, skip, skip, congr, rw [← zero_add (0:ℝ)], congr,
rw [← zero_mul ∥p.2∥], skip, rw [← mul_zero ∥p.1∥] },
exact ((tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.1 (continuous_fst.tendsto p)).mul
(continuous_snd.tendsto p).norm).add
(tendsto_const_nhds.mul (tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.1 (continuous_snd.tendsto p))) }
end
theorem closure_ball [normed_space ℝ E] (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
closure (ball x r) = closed_ball x r :=
begin
refine set.subset.antisymm closure_ball_subset_closed_ball (λ y hy, _),
have : continuous_within_at (λ c : ℝ, c • (y - x) + x) (set.Ico 0 1) 1 :=
((continuous_id.smul continuous_const).add continuous_const).continuous_within_at,
convert this.mem_closure _ _,
{ rw [one_smul, sub_add_cancel] },
{ simp [closure_Ico (@zero_lt_one ℝ _), zero_le_one] },
{ rintros c ⟨hc0, hc1⟩,
rw [set.mem_preimage, mem_ball, dist_eq_norm, add_sub_cancel, norm_smul, real.norm_eq_abs,
abs_of_nonneg hc0, mul_comm, ← mul_one r],
rw [mem_closed_ball, dist_eq_norm] at hy,
apply mul_lt_mul'; assumption }
end
theorem frontier_ball [normed_space ℝ E] (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
frontier (ball x r) = sphere x r :=
begin
rw [frontier, closure_ball x hr, is_open_ball.interior_eq],
ext x, exact (@eq_iff_le_not_lt ℝ _ _ _).symm
end
theorem interior_closed_ball [normed_space ℝ E] (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
interior (closed_ball x r) = ball x r :=
begin
refine set.subset.antisymm _ ball_subset_interior_closed_ball,
intros y hy,
rcases le_iff_lt_or_eq.1 (mem_closed_ball.1 $ interior_subset hy) with hr|rfl, { exact hr },
set f : ℝ → E := λ c : ℝ, c • (y - x) + x,
suffices : f ⁻¹' closed_ball x (dist y x) ⊆ set.Icc (-1) 1,
{ have hfc : continuous f := (continuous_id.smul continuous_const).add continuous_const,
have hf1 : (1:ℝ) ∈ f ⁻¹' (interior (closed_ball x $ dist y x)), by simpa [f],
have h1 : (1:ℝ) ∈ interior (set.Icc (-1:ℝ) 1) :=
interior_mono this (preimage_interior_subset_interior_preimage hfc hf1),
contrapose h1,
simp },
intros c hc,
rw [set.mem_Icc, ← abs_le, ← real.norm_eq_abs, ← mul_le_mul_right hr],
simpa [f, dist_eq_norm, norm_smul] using hc
end
theorem interior_closed_ball' [normed_space ℝ E] [nontrivial E] (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
interior (closed_ball x r) = ball x r :=
begin
rcases lt_trichotomy r 0 with hr|rfl|hr,
{ simp [closed_ball_eq_empty_iff_neg.2 hr, ball_eq_empty_iff_nonpos.2 (le_of_lt hr)] },
{ suffices : x ∉ interior {x},
{ rw [ball_zero, closed_ball_zero, ← set.subset_empty_iff],
intros y hy,
obtain rfl : y = x := set.mem_singleton_iff.1 (interior_subset hy),
exact this hy },
rw [← set.mem_compl_iff, ← closure_compl],
rcases exists_ne (0 : E) with ⟨z, hz⟩,
suffices : (λ c : ℝ, x + c • z) 0 ∈ closure ({x}ᶜ : set E),
by simpa only [zero_smul, add_zero] using this,
have : (0:ℝ) ∈ closure (set.Ioi (0:ℝ)), by simp [closure_Ioi],
refine (continuous_const.add (continuous_id.smul
continuous_const)).continuous_within_at.mem_closure this _,
intros c hc,
simp [smul_eq_zero, hz, ne_of_gt hc] },
{ exact interior_closed_ball x hr }
end
theorem frontier_closed_ball [normed_space ℝ E] (x : E) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
frontier (closed_ball x r) = sphere x r :=
by rw [frontier, closure_closed_ball, interior_closed_ball x hr,
closed_ball_diff_ball]
theorem frontier_closed_ball' [normed_space ℝ E] [nontrivial E] (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
frontier (closed_ball x r) = sphere x r :=
by rw [frontier, closure_closed_ball, interior_closed_ball' x r, closed_ball_diff_ball]
open normed_field
/-- If there is a scalar `c` with `∥c∥>1`, then any element can be moved by scalar multiplication to
any shell of width `∥c∥`. Also recap information on the norm of the rescaling element that shows
up in applications. -/
lemma rescale_to_shell {c : α} (hc : 1 < ∥c∥) {ε : ℝ} (εpos : 0 < ε) {x : E} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
∃d:α, d ≠ 0 ∧ ∥d • x∥ ≤ ε ∧ (ε/∥c∥ ≤ ∥d • x∥) ∧ (∥d∥⁻¹ ≤ ε⁻¹ * ∥c∥ * ∥x∥) :=
begin
have xεpos : 0 < ∥x∥/ε := div_pos (norm_pos_iff.2 hx) εpos,
rcases exists_int_pow_near xεpos hc with ⟨n, hn⟩,
have cpos : 0 < ∥c∥ := lt_trans (zero_lt_one : (0 :ℝ) < 1) hc,
have cnpos : 0 < ∥c^(n+1)∥ := by { rw norm_fpow, exact lt_trans xεpos hn.2 },
refine ⟨(c^(n+1))⁻¹, _, _, _, _⟩,
show (c ^ (n + 1))⁻¹ ≠ 0,
by rwa [ne.def, inv_eq_zero, ← ne.def, ← norm_pos_iff],
show ∥(c ^ (n + 1))⁻¹ • x∥ ≤ ε,
{ rw [norm_smul, norm_inv, ← div_eq_inv_mul, div_le_iff cnpos, mul_comm, norm_fpow],
exact (div_le_iff εpos).1 (le_of_lt (hn.2)) },
show ε / ∥c∥ ≤ ∥(c ^ (n + 1))⁻¹ • x∥,
{ rw [div_le_iff cpos, norm_smul, norm_inv, norm_fpow, fpow_add (ne_of_gt cpos),
fpow_one, mul_inv_rev', mul_comm, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel (ne_of_gt cpos),
one_mul, ← div_eq_inv_mul, le_div_iff (fpow_pos_of_pos cpos _), mul_comm],
exact (le_div_iff εpos).1 hn.1 },
show ∥(c ^ (n + 1))⁻¹∥⁻¹ ≤ ε⁻¹ * ∥c∥ * ∥x∥,
{ have : ε⁻¹ * ∥c∥ * ∥x∥ = ε⁻¹ * ∥x∥ * ∥c∥, by ring,
rw [norm_inv, inv_inv', norm_fpow, fpow_add (ne_of_gt cpos), fpow_one, this, ← div_eq_inv_mul],
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hn.1 (norm_nonneg _) }
end
/-- The product of two normed spaces is a normed space, with the sup norm. -/
instance : normed_space α (E × F) :=
{ norm_smul_le := λ s x, le_of_eq $ by simp [prod.norm_def, norm_smul, mul_max_of_nonneg],
-- TODO: without the next two lines Lean unfolds `≤` to `real.le`
add_smul := λ r x y, prod.ext (add_smul _ _ _) (add_smul _ _ _),
smul_add := λ r x y, prod.ext (smul_add _ _ _) (smul_add _ _ _),
..prod.normed_group,
..prod.semimodule }
/-- The product of finitely many normed spaces is a normed space, with the sup norm. -/
instance pi.normed_space {E : ι → Type*} [fintype ι] [∀i, normed_group (E i)]
[∀i, normed_space α (E i)] : normed_space α (Πi, E i) :=
{ norm_smul_le := λ a f, le_of_eq $
show (↑(finset.sup finset.univ (λ (b : ι), nnnorm (a • f b))) : ℝ) =
nnnorm a * ↑(finset.sup finset.univ (λ (b : ι), nnnorm (f b))),
by simp only [(nnreal.coe_mul _ _).symm, nnreal.mul_finset_sup, nnnorm_smul] }
/-- A subspace of a normed space is also a normed space, with the restriction of the norm. -/
instance submodule.normed_space {𝕜 : Type*} [normed_field 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E] (s : submodule 𝕜 E) : normed_space 𝕜 s :=
{ norm_smul_le := λc x, le_of_eq $ norm_smul c (x : E) }
end normed_space
section normed_algebra
/-- A normed algebra `𝕜'` over `𝕜` is an algebra endowed with a norm for which the embedding of
`𝕜` in `𝕜'` is an isometry. -/
class normed_algebra (𝕜 : Type*) (𝕜' : Type*) [normed_field 𝕜] [normed_ring 𝕜']
extends algebra 𝕜 𝕜' :=
(norm_algebra_map_eq : ∀x:𝕜, ∥algebra_map 𝕜 𝕜' x∥ = ∥x∥)
@[simp] lemma norm_algebra_map_eq {𝕜 : Type*} (𝕜' : Type*) [normed_field 𝕜] [normed_ring 𝕜']
[h : normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜'] (x : 𝕜) : ∥algebra_map 𝕜 𝕜' x∥ = ∥x∥ :=
normed_algebra.norm_algebra_map_eq _
variables (𝕜 : Type*) [normed_field 𝕜]
variables (𝕜' : Type*) [normed_ring 𝕜']
@[priority 100]
instance normed_algebra.to_normed_space [h : normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜'] : normed_space 𝕜 𝕜' :=
{ norm_smul_le := λ s x, calc
∥s • x∥ = ∥((algebra_map 𝕜 𝕜') s) * x∥ : by { rw h.smul_def', refl }
... ≤ ∥algebra_map 𝕜 𝕜' s∥ * ∥x∥ : normed_ring.norm_mul _ _
... = ∥s∥ * ∥x∥ : by rw norm_algebra_map_eq,
..h }
instance normed_algebra.id : normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜 :=
{ norm_algebra_map_eq := by simp,
.. algebra.id 𝕜}
variables {𝕜'} [normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜']
include 𝕜
@[simp] lemma normed_algebra.norm_one : ∥(1:𝕜')∥ = 1 :=
by simpa using (norm_algebra_map_eq 𝕜' (1:𝕜))
lemma normed_algebra.zero_ne_one : (0:𝕜') ≠ 1 :=
begin
refine (norm_pos_iff.mp _).symm,
rw @normed_algebra.norm_one 𝕜, norm_num,
end
lemma normed_algebra.to_nonzero : nontrivial 𝕜' :=
⟨⟨0, 1, normed_algebra.zero_ne_one 𝕜⟩⟩
end normed_algebra
section restrict_scalars
variables (𝕜 : Type*) (𝕜' : Type*) [normed_field 𝕜] [normed_field 𝕜'] [normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜']
(E : Type*) [normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜' E]
/-- `𝕜`-normed space structure induced by a `𝕜'`-normed space structure when `𝕜'` is a
normed algebra over `𝕜`. Not registered as an instance as `𝕜'` can not be inferred.
The type synonym `semimodule.restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' E` will be endowed with this instance by default.
-/
def normed_space.restrict_scalars' : normed_space 𝕜 E :=
{ norm_smul_le := λc x, le_of_eq $ begin
change ∥(algebra_map 𝕜 𝕜' c) • x∥ = ∥c∥ * ∥x∥,
simp [norm_smul]
end,
..semimodule.restrict_scalars' 𝕜 𝕜' E }
instance {𝕜 : Type*} {𝕜' : Type*} {E : Type*} [I : normed_group E] :
normed_group (semimodule.restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' E) := I
instance semimodule.restrict_scalars.normed_space_orig {𝕜 : Type*} {𝕜' : Type*} {E : Type*}
[normed_field 𝕜'] [normed_group E] [I : normed_space 𝕜' E] :
normed_space 𝕜' (semimodule.restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' E) := I
instance : normed_space 𝕜 (semimodule.restrict_scalars 𝕜 𝕜' E) :=
(normed_space.restrict_scalars' 𝕜 𝕜' E : normed_space 𝕜 E)
end restrict_scalars
section summable
open_locale classical
open finset filter
variables [normed_group α] [normed_group β]
-- Applying a bounded homomorphism commutes with taking an (infinite) sum.
lemma has_sum_of_bounded_monoid_hom_of_has_sum
{f : ι → α} {φ : α →+ β} {x : α} (hf : has_sum f x) (C : ℝ) (hφ : ∀x, ∥φ x∥ ≤ C * ∥x∥) :
has_sum (λ (b:ι), φ (f b)) (φ x) :=
begin
unfold has_sum,
convert (φ.continuous_of_bound C hφ).continuous_at.tendsto.comp hf,
ext s, rw [function.comp_app, finset.sum_hom s φ],
end
lemma has_sum_of_bounded_monoid_hom_of_summable
{f : ι → α} {φ : α →+ β} (hf : summable f) (C : ℝ) (hφ : ∀x, ∥φ x∥ ≤ C * ∥x∥) :
has_sum (λ (b:ι), φ (f b)) (φ (∑'b, f b)) :=
has_sum_of_bounded_monoid_hom_of_has_sum hf.has_sum C hφ
lemma cauchy_seq_finset_iff_vanishing_norm {f : ι → α} :
cauchy_seq (λ s : finset ι, ∑ i in s, f i) ↔ ∀ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃s:finset ι, ∀t, disjoint t s → ∥ ∑ i in t, f i ∥ < ε :=
begin
simp only [cauchy_seq_finset_iff_vanishing, metric.mem_nhds_iff, exists_imp_distrib],
split,
{ assume h ε hε, refine h {x | ∥x∥ < ε} ε hε _, rw [ball_0_eq ε] },
{ assume h s ε hε hs,
rcases h ε hε with ⟨t, ht⟩,
refine ⟨t, assume u hu, hs _⟩,
rw [ball_0_eq],
exact ht u hu }
end
lemma summable_iff_vanishing_norm [complete_space α] {f : ι → α} :
summable f ↔ ∀ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃s:finset ι, ∀t, disjoint t s → ∥ ∑ i in t, f i ∥ < ε :=
by rw [summable_iff_cauchy_seq_finset, cauchy_seq_finset_iff_vanishing_norm]
lemma cauchy_seq_finset_of_norm_bounded {f : ι → α} (g : ι → ℝ) (hg : summable g)
(h : ∀i, ∥f i∥ ≤ g i) : cauchy_seq (λ s : finset ι, ∑ i in s, f i) :=
cauchy_seq_finset_iff_vanishing_norm.2 $ assume ε hε,
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := summable_iff_vanishing_norm.1 hg ε hε in
⟨s, assume t ht,
have ∥∑ i in t, g i∥ < ε := hs t ht,
have nn : 0 ≤ ∑ i in t, g i := finset.sum_nonneg (assume a _, le_trans (norm_nonneg _) (h a)),
lt_of_le_of_lt (norm_sum_le_of_le t (λ i _, h i)) $
by rwa [real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg nn] at this⟩
lemma cauchy_seq_finset_of_summable_norm {f : ι → α} (hf : summable (λa, ∥f a∥)) :
cauchy_seq (λ s : finset ι, ∑ a in s, f a) :=
cauchy_seq_finset_of_norm_bounded _ hf (assume i, le_refl _)
/-- If a function `f` is summable in norm, and along some sequence of finsets exhausting the space
its sum is converging to a limit `a`, then this holds along all finsets, i.e., `f` is summable
with sum `a`. -/
lemma has_sum_of_subseq_of_summable {f : ι → α} (hf : summable (λa, ∥f a∥))
{s : γ → finset ι} {p : filter γ} [ne_bot p]
(hs : tendsto s p at_top) {a : α} (ha : tendsto (λ b, ∑ i in s b, f i) p (𝓝 a)) :
has_sum f a :=
tendsto_nhds_of_cauchy_seq_of_subseq (cauchy_seq_finset_of_summable_norm hf) hs ha
/-- If `∑' i, ∥f i∥` is summable, then `∥(∑' i, f i)∥ ≤ (∑' i, ∥f i∥)`. Note that we do not assume
that `∑' i, f i` is summable, and it might not be the case if `α` is not a complete space. -/
lemma norm_tsum_le_tsum_norm {f : ι → α} (hf : summable (λi, ∥f i∥)) :
∥(∑'i, f i)∥ ≤ (∑' i, ∥f i∥) :=
begin
by_cases h : summable f,
{ have h₁ : tendsto (λs:finset ι, ∥∑ i in s, f i∥) at_top (𝓝 ∥(∑' i, f i)∥) :=
(continuous_norm.tendsto _).comp h.has_sum,
have h₂ : tendsto (λs:finset ι, ∑ i in s, ∥f i∥) at_top (𝓝 (∑' i, ∥f i∥)) :=
hf.has_sum,
exact le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto' h₁ h₂ (assume s, norm_sum_le _ _) },
{ rw tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable h,
simp [tsum_nonneg] }
end
lemma has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat_of_summable_norm {f : ℕ → α} {a : α} (hf : summable (λi, ∥f i∥)) :
has_sum f a ↔ tendsto (λn:ℕ, ∑ i in range n, f i) at_top (𝓝 a) :=
⟨λ h, h.tendsto_sum_nat,
λ h, has_sum_of_subseq_of_summable hf tendsto_finset_range h⟩
/-- The direct comparison test for series: if the norm of `f` is bounded by a real function `g`
which is summable, then `f` is summable. -/
lemma summable_of_norm_bounded
[complete_space α] {f : ι → α} (g : ι → ℝ) (hg : summable g) (h : ∀i, ∥f i∥ ≤ g i) :
summable f :=
by { rw summable_iff_cauchy_seq_finset, exact cauchy_seq_finset_of_norm_bounded g hg h }
/-- Quantitative result associated to the direct comparison test for series: If `∑' i, g i` is
summable, and for all `i`, `∥f i∥ ≤ g i`, then `∥(∑' i, f i)∥ ≤ (∑' i, g i)`. Note that we do not
assume that `∑' i, f i` is summable, and it might not be the case if `α` is not a complete space. -/
lemma tsum_of_norm_bounded {f : ι → α} {g : ι → ℝ} {a : ℝ} (hg : has_sum g a) (h : ∀i, ∥f i∥ ≤ g i) :
∥(∑' (i:ι), f i)∥ ≤ a :=
begin
have h' : summable (λ (i : ι), ∥f i∥),
{ let f' : ι → ℝ := λ i, ∥f i∥,
have h'' : ∀ i, ∥f' i∥ ≤ g i,
{ intros i,
convert h i,
simp },
simpa [f'] using summable_of_norm_bounded g hg.summable h'' },
have h1 : ∥(∑' (i:ι), f i)∥ ≤ ∑' (i:ι), ∥f i∥ := by simpa using norm_tsum_le_tsum_norm h',
have h2 := tsum_le_tsum h h' hg.summable,
have h3 : a = ∑' (i:ι), g i := (has_sum.tsum_eq hg).symm,
linarith
end
variable [complete_space α]
/-- Variant of the direct comparison test for series: if the norm of `f` is eventually bounded by a
real function `g` which is summable, then `f` is summable. -/
lemma summable_of_norm_bounded_eventually {f : ι → α} (g : ι → ℝ) (hg : summable g)
(h : ∀ᶠ i in cofinite, ∥f i∥ ≤ g i) : summable f :=
begin
replace h := mem_cofinite.1 h,
refine h.summable_compl_iff.mp _,
refine summable_of_norm_bounded _ (h.summable_compl_iff.mpr hg) _,
rintros ⟨a, h'⟩,
simpa using h'
end
lemma summable_of_nnnorm_bounded {f : ι → α} (g : ι → nnreal) (hg : summable g)
(h : ∀i, nnnorm (f i) ≤ g i) : summable f :=
summable_of_norm_bounded (λ i, (g i : ℝ)) (nnreal.summable_coe.2 hg) (λ i, by exact_mod_cast h i)
lemma summable_of_summable_norm {f : ι → α} (hf : summable (λa, ∥f a∥)) : summable f :=
summable_of_norm_bounded _ hf (assume i, le_refl _)
lemma summable_of_summable_nnnorm {f : ι → α} (hf : summable (λa, nnnorm (f a))) : summable f :=
summable_of_nnnorm_bounded _ hf (assume i, le_refl _)
end summable
|
4779b31a64bf1ce45a3759a6e59accfba7a7cd71 | 4376c25f060c13471bb89cdb12aeac1d53e53876 | /src/espaces-metriques/custom/topology.lean | c7a7225a936785d0b00c523448c17cfd82ff681a | [
"MIT"
] | permissive | RaitoBezarius/projet-maths-lean | 8fa7df563d64c256561ab71893c523fc1424b85c | 42356e980e021a20c3468f5ca1639fec01bb934f | refs/heads/master | 1,613,002,128,339 | 1,589,289,282,000 | 1,589,289,282,000 | 244,431,534 | 0 | 1 | MIT | 1,584,312,574,000 | 1,583,169,883,000 | TeX | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 498 | lean | import .defs
import .sequences
open espace_metrique
section topologie
variables {X:Type} [espace_metrique X]
-- Accumulation point of S
def adhere_ens (S: set X) (l: X) := ∃ (x: ℕ → X), (∀ n, x n ∈ S) ∧ (converge x l)
-- Limit point: l is an accumulation point of S \ { l }
def point_limite (S: set X) (l: X) := adhere_ens (S \ {l}) l
-- Completeness of the space.
def complete (T: Type) [espace_metrique T] := ∀ x : ℕ → T, cauchy x → ∃ l : T, converge x l
end topologie |
ea753d46b90579b2f9dc9e1916629b89faf92ac2 | 63abd62053d479eae5abf4951554e1064a4c45b4 | /src/algebra/category/Mon/basic.lean | 1616d7095a67a8fb54fae5d8f078369d8ce94014 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Lix0120/mathlib | 0020745240315ed0e517cbf32e738d8f9811dd80 | e14c37827456fc6707f31b4d1d16f1f3a3205e91 | refs/heads/master | 1,673,102,855,024 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 308,930,245 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,604,164,710,000 | 1,604,163,547,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,406 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import category_theory.concrete_category.bundled_hom
import category_theory.concrete_category.reflects_isomorphisms
import algebra.punit_instances
/-!
# Category instances for monoid, add_monoid, comm_monoid, and add_comm_monoid.
We introduce the bundled categories:
* `Mon`
* `AddMon`
* `CommMon`
* `AddCommMon`
along with the relevant forgetful functors between them.
-/
universes u v
open category_theory
/-- The category of monoids and monoid morphisms. -/
@[to_additive AddMon]
def Mon : Type (u+1) := bundled monoid
/-- The category of additive monoids and monoid morphisms. -/
add_decl_doc AddMon
namespace Mon
@[to_additive]
instance bundled_hom : bundled_hom @monoid_hom :=
⟨@monoid_hom.to_fun, @monoid_hom.id, @monoid_hom.comp, @monoid_hom.coe_inj⟩
attribute [derive [has_coe_to_sort, large_category, concrete_category]] Mon AddMon
/-- Construct a bundled `Mon` from the underlying type and typeclass. -/
@[to_additive]
def of (M : Type u) [monoid M] : Mon := bundled.of M
/-- Construct a bundled `Mon` from the underlying type and typeclass. -/
add_decl_doc AddMon.of
@[to_additive]
instance : inhabited Mon :=
-- The default instance for `monoid punit` is derived via `punit.comm_ring`,
-- which breaks to_additive.
⟨@of punit $ @group.to_monoid _ $ @comm_group.to_group _ punit.comm_group⟩
@[to_additive]
instance (M : Mon) : monoid M := M.str
@[simp, to_additive] lemma coe_of (R : Type u) [monoid R] : (Mon.of R : Type u) = R := rfl
end Mon
/-- The category of commutative monoids and monoid morphisms. -/
@[to_additive AddCommMon]
def CommMon : Type (u+1) := bundled comm_monoid
/-- The category of additive commutative monoids and monoid morphisms. -/
add_decl_doc AddCommMon
namespace CommMon
@[to_additive]
instance : bundled_hom.parent_projection comm_monoid.to_monoid := ⟨⟩
attribute [derive [has_coe_to_sort, large_category, concrete_category]] CommMon AddCommMon
/-- Construct a bundled `CommMon` from the underlying type and typeclass. -/
@[to_additive]
def of (M : Type u) [comm_monoid M] : CommMon := bundled.of M
/-- Construct a bundled `AddCommMon` from the underlying type and typeclass. -/
add_decl_doc AddCommMon.of
@[to_additive]
instance : inhabited CommMon :=
-- The default instance for `comm_monoid punit` is derived via `punit.comm_ring`,
-- which breaks to_additive.
⟨@of punit $ @comm_group.to_comm_monoid _ punit.comm_group⟩
@[to_additive]
instance (M : CommMon) : comm_monoid M := M.str
@[simp, to_additive] lemma coe_of (R : Type u) [comm_monoid R] : (CommMon.of R : Type u) = R := rfl
@[to_additive has_forget_to_AddMon]
instance has_forget_to_Mon : has_forget₂ CommMon Mon := bundled_hom.forget₂ _ _
end CommMon
-- We verify that the coercions of morphisms to functions work correctly:
example {R S : Mon} (f : R ⟶ S) : (R : Type) → (S : Type) := f
example {R S : CommMon} (f : R ⟶ S) : (R : Type) → (S : Type) := f
-- We verify that when constructing a morphism in `CommMon`,
-- when we construct the `to_fun` field, the types are presented as `↥R`,
-- rather than `R.α` or (as we used to have) `↥(bundled.map comm_monoid.to_monoid R)`.
example (R : CommMon.{u}) : R ⟶ R :=
{ to_fun := λ x,
begin
match_target (R : Type u),
match_hyp x : (R : Type u),
exact x * x
end ,
map_one' := by simp,
map_mul' := λ x y,
begin rw [mul_assoc x y (x * y), ←mul_assoc y x y, mul_comm y x, mul_assoc, mul_assoc], end, }
variables {X Y : Type u}
section
variables [monoid X] [monoid Y]
/-- Build an isomorphism in the category `Mon` from a `mul_equiv` between `monoid`s. -/
@[to_additive add_equiv.to_AddMon_iso "Build an isomorphism in the category `AddMon` from
an `add_equiv` between `add_monoid`s."]
def mul_equiv.to_Mon_iso (e : X ≃* Y) : Mon.of X ≅ Mon.of Y :=
{ hom := e.to_monoid_hom,
inv := e.symm.to_monoid_hom }
@[simp, to_additive add_equiv.to_AddMon_iso_hom]
lemma mul_equiv.to_Mon_iso_hom {e : X ≃* Y} : e.to_Mon_iso.hom = e.to_monoid_hom := rfl
@[simp, to_additive add_equiv.to_AddMon_iso_inv]
lemma mul_equiv.to_Mon_iso_inv {e : X ≃* Y} : e.to_Mon_iso.inv = e.symm.to_monoid_hom := rfl
end
section
variables [comm_monoid X] [comm_monoid Y]
/-- Build an isomorphism in the category `CommMon` from a `mul_equiv` between `comm_monoid`s. -/
@[to_additive add_equiv.to_AddCommMon_iso "Build an isomorphism in the category `AddCommMon` from
an `add_equiv` between `add_comm_monoid`s."]
def mul_equiv.to_CommMon_iso (e : X ≃* Y) : CommMon.of X ≅ CommMon.of Y :=
{ hom := e.to_monoid_hom,
inv := e.symm.to_monoid_hom }
@[simp, to_additive add_equiv.to_AddCommMon_iso_hom]
lemma mul_equiv.to_CommMon_iso_hom {e : X ≃* Y} : e.to_CommMon_iso.hom = e.to_monoid_hom := rfl
@[simp, to_additive add_equiv.to_AddCommMon_iso_inv]
lemma mul_equiv.to_CommMon_iso_inv {e : X ≃* Y} : e.to_CommMon_iso.inv = e.symm.to_monoid_hom := rfl
end
namespace category_theory.iso
/-- Build a `mul_equiv` from an isomorphism in the category `Mon`. -/
@[to_additive AddMon_iso_to_add_equiv "Build an `add_equiv` from an isomorphism in the category
`AddMon`."]
def Mon_iso_to_mul_equiv {X Y : Mon} (i : X ≅ Y) : X ≃* Y :=
i.hom.to_mul_equiv i.inv i.hom_inv_id i.inv_hom_id
/-- Build a `mul_equiv` from an isomorphism in the category `CommMon`. -/
@[to_additive "Build an `add_equiv` from an isomorphism in the category
`AddCommMon`."]
def CommMon_iso_to_mul_equiv {X Y : CommMon} (i : X ≅ Y) : X ≃* Y :=
i.hom.to_mul_equiv i.inv i.hom_inv_id i.inv_hom_id
end category_theory.iso
/-- multiplicative equivalences between `monoid`s are the same as (isomorphic to) isomorphisms
in `Mon` -/
@[to_additive add_equiv_iso_AddMon_iso "additive equivalences between `add_monoid`s are the same
as (isomorphic to) isomorphisms in `AddMon`"]
def mul_equiv_iso_Mon_iso {X Y : Type u} [monoid X] [monoid Y] :
(X ≃* Y) ≅ (Mon.of X ≅ Mon.of Y) :=
{ hom := λ e, e.to_Mon_iso,
inv := λ i, i.Mon_iso_to_mul_equiv, }
/-- multiplicative equivalences between `comm_monoid`s are the same as (isomorphic to) isomorphisms
in `CommMon` -/
@[to_additive add_equiv_iso_AddCommMon_iso "additive equivalences between `add_comm_monoid`s are
the same as (isomorphic to) isomorphisms in `AddCommMon`"]
def mul_equiv_iso_CommMon_iso {X Y : Type u} [comm_monoid X] [comm_monoid Y] :
(X ≃* Y) ≅ (CommMon.of X ≅ CommMon.of Y) :=
{ hom := λ e, e.to_CommMon_iso,
inv := λ i, i.CommMon_iso_to_mul_equiv, }
@[to_additive]
instance Mon.forget_reflects_isos : reflects_isomorphisms (forget Mon.{u}) :=
{ reflects := λ X Y f _,
begin
resetI,
let i := as_iso ((forget Mon).map f),
let e : X ≃* Y := { ..f, ..i.to_equiv },
exact { ..e.to_Mon_iso },
end }
@[to_additive]
instance CommMon.forget_reflects_isos : reflects_isomorphisms (forget CommMon.{u}) :=
{ reflects := λ X Y f _,
begin
resetI,
let i := as_iso ((forget CommMon).map f),
let e : X ≃* Y := { ..f, ..i.to_equiv },
exact { ..e.to_CommMon_iso },
end }
/-!
Once we've shown that the forgetful functors to type reflect isomorphisms,
we automatically obtain that the `forget₂` functors between our concrete categories
reflect isomorphisms.
-/
example : reflects_isomorphisms (forget₂ CommMon Mon) := by apply_instance
|
fd16bea1726f8f8519cb8bb76bedf1cf9a558a53 | 3268ab3a126f0fef71459fbf170dc38efe5d0506 | /cohomology/serre.hlean | e6c6ab4adfc38835f02edc506d9a8ceb1d20a583 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soraismus/Spectral | f043fed1a4e02ddfeba531769b2980eb817471f4 | 32512bf47db3a1b932856e7ed7c7830b1fc07ef0 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,628,705,579 | 1,538,609,948,000 | 1,538,609,974,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 15,309 | hlean | import ..algebra.spectral_sequence ..spectrum.trunc .basic
open eq spectrum trunc is_trunc pointed int EM algebra left_module fiber lift equiv is_equiv
cohomology group sigma unit is_conn prod
set_option pp.binder_types true
/- Eilenberg MacLane spaces are the fibers of the Postnikov system of a type -/
namespace pointed
definition postnikov_map [constructor] (A : Type*) (n : ℕ₋₂) : ptrunc (n.+1) A →* ptrunc n A :=
ptrunc.elim (n.+1) (ptr n A)
definition ptrunc_functor_postnikov_map {A B : Type*} (n : ℕ₋₂) (f : A →* B) :
ptrunc_functor n f ∘* postnikov_map A n ~* ptrunc.elim (n.+1) (!ptr ∘* f) :=
begin
fapply phomotopy.mk,
{ intro x, induction x with a, reflexivity },
{ reflexivity }
end
section
open nat group
definition pfiber_postnikov_map (A : Type*) (n : ℕ) :
pfiber (postnikov_map A n) ≃* EM_type A (n+1) :=
begin
symmetry, apply EM_type_pequiv,
{ symmetry, refine _ ⬝g ghomotopy_group_ptrunc (n+1) A,
exact chain_complex.LES_isomorphism_of_trivial_cod _ _
(trivial_homotopy_group_of_is_trunc _ (self_lt_succ n))
(trivial_homotopy_group_of_is_trunc _ (le_succ _)) },
{ apply is_conn_fun_trunc_elim, apply is_conn_fun_tr },
{ have is_trunc (n+1) (ptrunc n.+1 A), from !is_trunc_trunc,
have is_trunc ((n+1).+1) (ptrunc n A), by do 2 apply is_trunc_succ, apply is_trunc_trunc,
exact is_trunc_pfiber _ _ _ _ }
end
end
definition postnikov_map_natural {A B : Type*} (f : A →* B) (n : ℕ₋₂) :
psquare (postnikov_map A n) (postnikov_map B n)
(ptrunc_functor (n.+1) f) (ptrunc_functor n f) :=
!ptrunc_functor_postnikov_map ⬝* !ptrunc_elim_ptrunc_functor⁻¹*
definition is_equiv_postnikov_map (A : Type*) {n k : ℕ₋₂} [HA : is_trunc k A] (H : k ≤ n) :
is_equiv (postnikov_map A n) :=
begin
apply is_equiv_of_equiv_of_homotopy
(ptrunc_pequiv_ptrunc_of_is_trunc (trunc_index.le.step H) H HA),
intro x, induction x, reflexivity
end
definition encode_ap1_gen_tr (n : ℕ₋₂) {A : Type*} {a a' : A} (p : a = a') :
trunc.encode (ap1_gen tr idp idp p) = tr p :> trunc n (a = a') :=
by induction p; reflexivity
definition ap1_postnikov_map (A : Type*) (n : ℕ₋₂) :
psquare (Ω→ (postnikov_map A (n.+1))) (postnikov_map (Ω A) n)
(loop_ptrunc_pequiv (n.+1) A) (loop_ptrunc_pequiv n A) :=
have psquare (postnikov_map (Ω A) n) (Ω→ (postnikov_map A (n.+1)))
(loop_ptrunc_pequiv (n.+1) A)⁻¹ᵉ* (loop_ptrunc_pequiv n A)⁻¹ᵉ*,
begin
refine _ ⬝* !ap1_ptrunc_elim⁻¹*, apply pinv_left_phomotopy_of_phomotopy,
fapply phomotopy.mk,
{ intro x, induction x with p, exact !encode_ap1_gen_tr⁻¹ },
{ reflexivity }
end,
this⁻¹ᵛ*
end pointed open pointed
namespace spectrum
definition postnikov_smap [constructor] (X : spectrum) (k : ℤ) :
strunc k X →ₛ strunc (k - 1) X :=
strunc_elim (str (k - 1) X) (is_strunc_strunc_pred X k)
definition postnikov_map_pred (A : Type*) (n : ℕ₋₂) :
ptrunc n A →* ptrunc (trunc_index.pred n) A :=
begin cases n with n, exact !pid, exact postnikov_map A n end
definition pfiber_postnikov_map_pred (A : Type*) (n : ℕ) :
pfiber (postnikov_map_pred A n) ≃* EM_type A n :=
begin
cases n with n,
apply pfiber_pequiv_of_is_contr, apply is_contr_ptrunc_minus_one,
exact pfiber_postnikov_map A n
end
definition pfiber_postnikov_map_pred' (A : spectrum) (n k l : ℤ) (p : n + k = l) :
pfiber (postnikov_map_pred (A k) (maxm2 l)) ≃* EM_spectrum (πₛ[n] A) l :=
begin
cases l with l l,
{ refine pfiber_postnikov_map_pred (A k) l ⬝e* _,
exact EM_type_pequiv_EM A p },
{ refine pequiv_of_is_contr _ _ _ _, apply is_contr_pfiber_pid,
apply is_contr_EM_spectrum_neg }
end
definition psquare_postnikov_map_ptrunc_elim (A : Type*) {n k l : ℕ₋₂} (H : is_trunc n (ptrunc k A))
(p : n = l.+1) (q : k = l) :
psquare (ptrunc.elim n (ptr k A)) (postnikov_map A l)
(ptrunc_change_index p A) (ptrunc_change_index q A) :=
begin
induction q, cases p,
refine _ ⬝pv* pvrfl,
apply ptrunc_elim_phomotopy2,
reflexivity
end
definition postnikov_smap_postnikov_map (A : spectrum) (n k l : ℤ) (p : n + k = l) :
psquare (postnikov_smap A n k) (postnikov_map_pred (A k) (maxm2 l))
(ptrunc_maxm2_change_int p (A k)) (ptrunc_maxm2_pred (A k) (ap pred p⁻¹ ⬝ add.right_comm n k (- 1))) :=
begin
cases l with l,
{ cases l with l, apply phomotopy_of_is_contr_cod_pmap, apply is_contr_ptrunc_minus_one,
refine psquare_postnikov_map_ptrunc_elim (A k) _ _ _ ⬝hp* _,
exact ap maxm2 (add.right_comm n (- 1) k ⬝ ap pred p ⬝ !pred_succ),
apply ptrunc_maxm2_pred_nat },
{ apply phomotopy_of_is_contr_cod_pmap, apply is_trunc_trunc }
end
definition sfiber_postnikov_smap_pequiv (A : spectrum) (n : ℤ) (k : ℤ) :
sfiber (postnikov_smap A n) k ≃* ssuspn n (EM_spectrum (πₛ[n] A)) k :=
proof
pfiber_pequiv_of_square _ _ (postnikov_smap_postnikov_map A n k (n + k) idp) ⬝e*
pfiber_postnikov_map_pred' A n k _ idp ⬝e*
pequiv_ap (EM_spectrum (πₛ[n] A)) (add.comm n k)
qed
open exact_couple
section atiyah_hirzebruch
parameters {X : Type*} (Y : X → spectrum) (s₀ : ℤ) (H : Πx, is_strunc s₀ (Y x))
include H
definition atiyah_hirzebruch_exact_couple : exact_couple rℤ Z2 :=
@exact_couple_sequence (λs, spi X (λx, strunc s (Y x)))
(λs, spi_compose_left (λx, postnikov_smap (Y x) s))
-- include H
definition atiyah_hirzebruch_ub ⦃s n : ℤ⦄ (Hs : s ≤ n - 1) :
is_contr (πₛ[n] (spi X (λx, strunc s (Y x)))) :=
begin
refine trivial_shomotopy_group_of_is_strunc _ _ (lt_of_le_sub_one Hs),
apply is_strunc_spi, intro x, exact is_strunc_strunc _ _
end
definition atiyah_hirzebruch_lb' ⦃s n : ℤ⦄ (Hs : s ≥ s₀ + 1) :
is_equiv (spi_compose_left (λx, postnikov_smap (Y x) s) n) :=
begin
refine is_equiv_of_equiv_of_homotopy
(ppi_pequiv_right (λx, ptrunc_pequiv_ptrunc_of_is_trunc _ _ (H x n))) _,
{ intro x, apply maxm2_monotone, apply add_le_add_right, exact le.trans !le_add_one Hs },
{ intro x, apply maxm2_monotone, apply add_le_add_right, exact le_sub_one_of_lt Hs },
intro f, apply eq_of_phomotopy,
apply pmap_compose_ppi_phomotopy_left, intro x,
fapply phomotopy.mk,
{ refine @trunc.rec _ _ _ _ _,
{ intro x, apply is_trunc_eq,
assert H3 : maxm2 (s - 1 + n) ≤ (maxm2 (s + n)).+1,
{ refine trunc_index.le_succ (maxm2_monotone (le.trans (le_of_eq !add.right_comm)
!sub_one_le)) },
exact @is_trunc_of_le _ _ _ H3 !is_trunc_trunc },
intro a, reflexivity },
reflexivity
end
definition atiyah_hirzebruch_lb ⦃s n : ℤ⦄ (Hs : s ≥ s₀ + 1) :
is_equiv (πₛ→[n] (spi_compose_left (λx, postnikov_smap (Y x) s))) :=
begin
apply is_equiv_homotopy_group_functor, apply atiyah_hirzebruch_lb', exact Hs
end
definition is_bounded_atiyah_hirzebruch : is_bounded atiyah_hirzebruch_exact_couple :=
is_bounded_sequence _ (λn, s₀) (λn, n - 1) atiyah_hirzebruch_lb atiyah_hirzebruch_ub
definition atiyah_hirzebruch_convergence1 :
(λn s, πₛ[n] (sfiber (spi_compose_left (λx, postnikov_smap (Y x) s)))) ⟹ᵍ
(λn, πₛ[n] (spi X (λx, strunc s₀ (Y x)))) :=
convergent_exact_couple_sequence _ (λn, s₀) (λn, n - 1) atiyah_hirzebruch_lb atiyah_hirzebruch_ub
definition atiyah_hirzebruch_convergence2 :
(λn s, opH^-(n-s)[(x : X), πₛ[s] (Y x)]) ⟹ᵍ (λn, pH^n[(x : X), Y x]) :=
convergent_exact_couple_g_isomorphism
(convergent_exact_couple_negate_abutment atiyah_hirzebruch_convergence1)
begin
intro n s,
refine _ ⬝g (parametrized_cohomology_isomorphism_shomotopy_group_spi _ idp)⁻¹ᵍ,
refine _ ⬝g !shomotopy_group_ssuspn,
apply shomotopy_group_isomorphism_of_pequiv n, intro k,
refine !pfiber_pppi_compose_left ⬝e* _,
exact ppi_pequiv_right (λx, sfiber_postnikov_smap_pequiv (Y x) s k)
end
begin
intro n,
refine _ ⬝g (parametrized_cohomology_isomorphism_shomotopy_group_spi _ !neg_neg)⁻¹ᵍ,
apply shomotopy_group_isomorphism_of_pequiv, intro k,
exact ppi_pequiv_right (λx, ptrunc_pequiv (maxm2 (s₀ + k)) (Y x k)),
end
open prod.ops
definition atiyah_hirzebruch_base_change [constructor] : agℤ ×ag agℤ ≃g agℤ ×ag agℤ :=
begin
fapply group.isomorphism.mk,
{ fapply group.homomorphism.mk, exact (λpq, (-(pq.1 + pq.2), -pq.2)),
intro pq pq',
induction pq with p q, induction pq' with p' q', esimp,
exact prod_eq (ap neg !add.comm4 ⬝ !neg_add) !neg_add },
{ fapply adjointify,
{ exact (λns, (ns.2 - ns.1, -ns.2)) },
{ intro ns, esimp,
exact prod_eq (ap neg (!add.comm ⬝ !neg_add_cancel_left) ⬝ !neg_neg) !neg_neg },
{ intro pq, esimp,
exact prod_eq (ap (λx, _ + x) !neg_neg ⬝ !add.comm ⬝ !add_neg_cancel_right) !neg_neg }}
end
definition atiyah_hirzebruch_convergence :
(λp q, opH^p[(x : X), πₛ[-q] (Y x)]) ⟹ᵍ (λn, pH^n[(x : X), Y x]) :=
begin
note z := convergent_exact_couple_reindex atiyah_hirzebruch_convergence2 atiyah_hirzebruch_base_change,
refine convergent_exact_couple_g_isomorphism z _ (by intro n; reflexivity),
intro p q,
apply parametrized_cohomology_change_int,
esimp,
refine !neg_neg_sub_neg ⬝ !add_neg_cancel_right
end
definition atiyah_hirzebruch_spectral_sequence :
convergent_spectral_sequence_g (λp q, opH^p[(x : X), πₛ[-q] (Y x)]) (λn, pH^n[(x : X), Y x]) :=
begin
apply convergent_spectral_sequence_of_exact_couple atiyah_hirzebruch_convergence,
{ intro n, exact add.comm (s₀ - -n) (-s₀) ⬝ !neg_add_cancel_left ⬝ !neg_neg },
{ reflexivity }
end
/-
to unfold a field of atiyah_hirzebruch_spectral_sequence:
esimp [atiyah_hirzebruch_spectral_sequence, convergent_spectral_sequence_of_exact_couple,
atiyah_hirzebruch_convergence, convergent_exact_couple_g_isomorphism,
convergent_exact_couple_isomorphism, convergent_exact_couple_reindex,
atiyah_hirzebruch_convergence2, convergent_exact_couple_negate_abutment,
atiyah_hirzebruch_convergence1, convergent_exact_couple_sequence],
-/
definition AHSS_deg_d (r : ℕ) :
convergent_spectral_sequence.deg_d atiyah_hirzebruch_spectral_sequence r =
(r + 2, -(r + 1)) :=
begin
reflexivity
end
end atiyah_hirzebruch
section unreduced_atiyah_hirzebruch
definition unreduced_atiyah_hirzebruch_convergence {X : Type} (Y : X → spectrum) (s₀ : ℤ)
(H : Πx, is_strunc s₀ (Y x)) :
(λp q, uopH^p[(x : X), πₛ[-q] (Y x)]) ⟹ᵍ (λn, upH^n[(x : X), Y x]) :=
convergent_exact_couple_g_isomorphism
(@atiyah_hirzebruch_convergence X₊ (add_point_spectrum Y) s₀ (is_strunc_add_point_spectrum H))
begin
intro p q, refine _ ⬝g !uopH_isomorphism_opH⁻¹ᵍ,
apply ordinary_parametrized_cohomology_isomorphism_right,
intro x,
apply shomotopy_group_add_point_spectrum
end
begin
intro n, reflexivity
end
definition unreduced_atiyah_hirzebruch_spectral_sequence {X : Type} (Y : X → spectrum) (s₀ : ℤ)
(H : Πx, is_strunc s₀ (Y x)) :
convergent_spectral_sequence_g (λp q, uopH^p[(x : X), πₛ[-q] (Y x)]) (λn, upH^n[(x : X), Y x]) :=
begin
apply convergent_spectral_sequence_of_exact_couple (unreduced_atiyah_hirzebruch_convergence Y s₀ H),
{ intro n, exact add.comm (s₀ - -n) (-s₀) ⬝ !neg_add_cancel_left ⬝ !neg_neg },
{ reflexivity }
end
end unreduced_atiyah_hirzebruch
section serre
universe variable u
variables {X B : Type.{u}} (b₀ : B) (F : B → Type) (f : X → B)
(Y : spectrum) (s₀ : ℤ) (H : is_strunc s₀ Y)
include H
definition serre_convergence :
(λp q, uopH^p[(b : B), uH^q[F b, Y]]) ⟹ᵍ (λn, uH^n[Σ(b : B), F b, Y]) :=
proof
convergent_exact_couple_g_isomorphism
(unreduced_atiyah_hirzebruch_convergence
(λx, sp_ucotensor (F x) Y) s₀
(λx, is_strunc_sp_ucotensor s₀ (F x) H))
begin
intro p q,
refine unreduced_ordinary_parametrized_cohomology_isomorphism_right _ p,
intro x,
exact (unreduced_cohomology_isomorphism_shomotopy_group_sp_ucotensor _ _ !neg_neg)⁻¹ᵍ
end
begin
intro n,
refine unreduced_parametrized_cohomology_isomorphism_shomotopy_group_supi _ !neg_neg ⬝g _,
refine _ ⬝g (unreduced_cohomology_isomorphism_shomotopy_group_sp_ucotensor _ _ !neg_neg)⁻¹ᵍ,
apply shomotopy_group_isomorphism_of_pequiv, intro k,
exact (sigma_pumap F (Y k))⁻¹ᵉ*
end
qed
definition serre_spectral_sequence :
convergent_spectral_sequence_g (λp q, uopH^p[(b : B), uH^q[F b, Y]]) (λn, uH^n[Σ(b : B), F b, Y]) :=
begin
apply convergent_spectral_sequence_of_exact_couple (serre_convergence F Y s₀ H),
{ intro n, exact add.comm (s₀ - -n) (-s₀) ⬝ !neg_add_cancel_left ⬝ !neg_neg },
{ reflexivity }
end
definition serre_convergence_map :
(λp q, uopH^p[(b : B), uH^q[fiber f b, Y]]) ⟹ᵍ (λn, uH^n[X, Y]) :=
proof
convergent_exact_couple_g_isomorphism
(serre_convergence (fiber f) Y s₀ H)
begin intro p q, reflexivity end
begin intro n, apply unreduced_cohomology_isomorphism, exact !sigma_fiber_equiv⁻¹ᵉ end
qed
definition serre_spectral_sequence_map :
convergent_spectral_sequence_g (λp q, uopH^p[(b : B), uH^q[fiber f b, Y]]) (λn, uH^n[X, Y]) :=
begin
apply convergent_spectral_sequence_of_exact_couple (serre_convergence_map f Y s₀ H),
{ intro n, exact add.comm (s₀ - -n) (-s₀) ⬝ !neg_add_cancel_left ⬝ !neg_neg },
{ reflexivity }
end
definition serre_convergence_of_is_conn (H2 : is_conn 1 B) :
(λp q, uoH^p[B, uH^q[F b₀, Y]]) ⟹ᵍ (λn, uH^n[Σ(b : B), F b, Y]) :=
proof
convergent_exact_couple_g_isomorphism
(serre_convergence F Y s₀ H)
begin intro p q, exact @uopH_isomorphism_uoH_of_is_conn (pointed.MK B b₀) _ _ H2 end
begin intro n, reflexivity end
qed
definition serre_spectral_sequence_of_is_conn (H2 : is_conn 1 B) :
convergent_spectral_sequence_g (λp q, uoH^p[B, uH^q[F b₀, Y]]) (λn, uH^n[Σ(b : B), F b, Y]) :=
begin
apply convergent_spectral_sequence_of_exact_couple (serre_convergence_of_is_conn b₀ F Y s₀ H H2),
{ intro n, exact add.comm (s₀ - -n) (-s₀) ⬝ !neg_add_cancel_left ⬝ !neg_neg },
{ reflexivity }
end
definition serre_convergence_map_of_is_conn (H2 : is_conn 1 B) :
(λp q, uoH^p[B, uH^q[fiber f b₀, Y]]) ⟹ᵍ (λn, uH^n[X, Y]) :=
proof
convergent_exact_couple_g_isomorphism
(serre_convergence_of_is_conn b₀ (fiber f) Y s₀ H H2)
begin intro p q, reflexivity end
begin intro n, apply unreduced_cohomology_isomorphism, exact !sigma_fiber_equiv⁻¹ᵉ end
qed
definition serre_spectral_sequence_map_of_is_conn (H2 : is_conn 1 B) :
convergent_spectral_sequence_g (λp q, uoH^p[B, uH^q[fiber f b₀, Y]]) (λn, uH^n[X, Y]) :=
begin
apply convergent_spectral_sequence_of_exact_couple (serre_convergence_map_of_is_conn b₀ f Y s₀ H H2),
{ intro n, exact add.comm (s₀ - -n) (-s₀) ⬝ !neg_add_cancel_left ⬝ !neg_neg },
{ reflexivity }
end
end serre
end spectrum
|
0712035c8106ab13b6064d0817f613ae0dada0da | 3c693e12637d1cf47effc09ab5e21700d1278e73 | /src/topology/twitch.lean | 1769ff6aed3d9449348f2a408ed3e74d268a7773 | [] | no_license | ImperialCollegeLondon/Example-Lean-Projects | e731664ae046980921a69ccfeb2286674080c5bb | 87b27ba616eaf03f3642000829a481a1932dd08e | refs/heads/master | 1,685,399,670,721 | 1,623,092,696,000 | 1,623,092,696,000 | 275,571,570 | 19 | 1 | null | 1,593,361,524,000 | 1,593,344,124,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 13,103 | lean | -- topological spaces from first princples!
-- Turns out there's quite a lot to it, but it's all straightforward
-- I'll start on the hour. I'll do a brief review of last week
-- (the below file,
-- https://github.com/ImperialCollegeLondon/Example-Lean-Projects/blob/master/src/topology/twitch.lean
-- and then I'll start on the proof that the continuous image of compact is compact.
import tactic
-- remember : in Lean, `set X` means the type of subsets of X
-- or, the type of "sets of elements of X"
open set
/-- The definition of a topological space -/
class topological_space (X : Type) :=
-- some subsets of X are called "open sets"
(is_open : set X → Prop)
-- X itself is open
(is_open_univ : is_open univ)
-- intersection of two open sets is open
(is_open_inter : ∀ U V : set X, is_open U → is_open V → is_open (U ∩ V))
-- arbitrary union of open sets is open
(is_open_sUnion : ∀ (𝒞 : set (set X)), (∀ U ∈ 𝒞, is_open U) → is_open (⋃₀ 𝒞))
-- what is an "arbitrary union of open sets"?
-- I've set it up as a set of open sets
-- but you might have an "indexed family of open sets"
-- ie some type ι, and for all i ∈ ι an open set U_i
-- and you want ⋃ U_i open
namespace topological_space
-- let X be a topological space
variables {X : Type} [topological_space X]
-- let's do indexed unions
lemma is_open_Union {ι : Type} {f : ι → set X} (hf : ∀ i : ι, is_open (f i)) :
is_open (⋃ i, f i) :=
begin
apply is_open_sUnion,
intros U hU,
cases hU with i hi,
dsimp at hi,
rw ←hi,
apply hf,
end
-- empty set is open
lemma is_open_empty : is_open (∅ : set X) :=
begin
let 𝒞 : set (set X) := ∅,
have h𝒞 : ∀ U ∈ 𝒞, is_open U,
{ rintro U ⟨⟩,
},
convert is_open_sUnion 𝒞 h𝒞,
rw sUnion_empty,
end
-- finite intersection of open sets is open
-- proof by induction on size of finite set
lemma is_open_sInter {𝒞 : set (set X)} (h𝒞 : finite 𝒞) :
(∀ U ∈ 𝒞, is_open U) → is_open ⋂₀ 𝒞 :=
begin
apply finite.induction_on h𝒞,
{ -- base case,
intros,
convert is_open_univ,
rw sInter_empty },
{ -- inductive step
-- going to use is_open_inter
intro U,
intro 𝒞,
intro hU𝒞,
intro h𝒞,
intro h𝒞2,
-- h says "assume both U and every element of 𝒞 is open"
-- insert U 𝒞 means {U} ∪ 𝒞
intro h,
rw sInter_insert,
apply is_open_inter,
{ apply h,
simp },
{ apply h𝒞2,
intros U hU,
apply h,
simp [hU] }},
end
-- a variant of finite intersection of opens is open
lemma is_open_bInter {I : Type} {F : set I} (hf : finite F)
(U : I → set X) (hU : ∀ (i : I), is_open (U i)) :
is_open (⋂ i ∈ F, U i) :=
begin
rw bInter_eq_Inter,
show is_open (⋂₀ set.range (λ x : F, U x)),
apply is_open_sInter,
{ rw ←image_univ,
apply finite.image,
haveI := classical.choice hf,
apply finite_univ },
finish,
end
def is_closed (C : set X) : Prop := is_open Cᶜ
@[simp] lemma is_closed_iff (C : set X) : is_closed C ↔ is_open Cᶜ := iff.rfl
-- clearly could spend all day proving facts about closed sets now
lemma is_closed_empty : is_closed (∅ : set X) :=
begin
simp [is_open_univ],
end
end topological_space
-- next : continuous functions
open topological_space
variables {X : Type} [topological_space X]
{Y : Type} [topological_space Y]
/-- a function X → Y between topological spaces is continuous if the
preimage of every open set is open -/
def continuous (f : X → Y) : Prop :=
∀ U, is_open U → is_open (f⁻¹' U)
theorem continuous_id : continuous (id : X → X) :=
begin
intro U,
intro hU,
-- interesting question
-- clearly id⁻¹' U = U
-- But this is true *by definition*?
-- another interesting question
-- clearly id'' U = U (pushforward)
-- but is this true *by definition*?
-- THESE QUESTIONS ARE NOT MATHEMATICAL QUESTIONS
-- They depend not on the specification, but on the *implementation*
-- have h1 : U = id '' U,
-- { --refl, -- fails!
-- -- not true by definition
-- ext x,
-- split,
-- intro h,
-- unfold set.image,
-- use x, -- this is why it's not true by definition
-- split, assumption, refl,
-- rintro ⟨y, hy1, rfl⟩,
-- exact hy1,
-- },
-- have h2 : U = id⁻¹' U, -- true by definition
-- refl,
exact hU,
end
variables {Z : Type} [topological_space Z]
theorem continuous.comp {f : X → Y} {g : Y → Z} (hf : continuous f)
(hg : continuous g) : continuous (g ∘ f) :=
begin
intro U,
intro hU,
change is_open ((g ∘ f)⁻¹' U),
change is_open (f⁻¹' (g⁻¹' U)),
-- proving it backwards
apply hf,
apply hg,
exact hU
end
-- term mode proof (same proof!)
theorem continuous.comp' {f : X → Y} {g : Y → Z} (hf : continuous f)
(hg : continuous g) : continuous (g ∘ f) :=
λ U hU, hf (g⁻¹' U) (hg _ hU)
/-- a subset C of a top space X is compact if every open cover has a finite subcover -/
def compact (C : set X) : Prop :=
∀ (ι : Type) (U : ι → set X) (hi : ∀ i : ι, is_open (U i)) (hC : C ⊆ ⋃i, U i),
∃ F : set ι, finite F ∧ C ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ F, U i
-- this definition seems to me to be easier to work with
def hausdorff (X : Type) [topological_space X] : Prop :=
∀ x y : X, x ≠ y → ∃ U V : set X, is_open U ∧ is_open V ∧ x ∈ U ∧ y ∈ V ∧ U ∩ V = ∅
-- Theorem: continuous image of a compact set is compact
theorem compact_map {f : X → Y} (hf : continuous f) {C : set X} (hC : compact C) :
compact (f '' C) :=
begin
-- suffices to prove that if f(C) is covered by open sets, it has a
-- finite subcover
intros I U hU hUC,
-- hUC : f(C) ⊆ ⋃_{i ∈ I} Uᵢ
-- So say we've covered f(C) by open sets
-- Then C has a cover by open sets, namely Vᵢ := f⁻¹(Uᵢ),
let V : I → set X := λ i, f⁻¹' (U i),
-- Let's check that all the Vᵢ are open
have hV : ∀ i : I, is_open (V i),
{ intro i,
apply hf,
apply hU },
-- Let's check that the Vᵢ cover C
have hVC : C ⊆ ⋃ i, V i,
{ -- say x ∈ C,
intro x,
intro hx,
-- then f(x) ∈ ⋃_i Uᵢ
have hx2 : f x ∈ ⋃ i, U i,
apply hUC,
use [x, hx],
-- f(x) ∈ ⋃_i Uᵢ, so ∃ i s.t. f(x) ∈ Uᵢ
rw mem_Union at hx2 ⊢,
cases hx2 with i hi,
use i,
exact hi },
-- but C is compact
specialize hC I V hV hVC,
-- so there exists a finite subcover of Vᵢ,
rcases hC with ⟨F, hF, hFC⟩,
-- I claim that corresponding Uᵢ will work
use [F, hF],
-- Let's check they cover f(C),
rintros _ ⟨x, hx1, rfl⟩,
specialize hFC hx1,
rw mem_bUnion_iff at hFC ⊢,
exact hFC,
-- They do, so the cover of f(C) had a finite subcover :D
end
-- To prove that a compact subspace of a Hausdorff space is closed,
-- we need the fact that a "locally open" set is open!
-- So let's prove that first
lemma open_iff_locally_open (V : set X) :
is_open V ↔ ∀ x : X, x ∈ V → ∃ U : set X, x ∈ U ∧ is_open U ∧ U ⊆ V :=
⟨λ hV x hx, ⟨V, hx, hV, subset.refl _⟩, λ h, begin
let 𝒞 : set (set X) := {U : set X | is_open U ∧ U ⊆ V},
-- 𝒞 doesn't just contain the neighbourhoods of x for each x ∈ V
-- 𝒞 contains more sets, e.g. the empty set!
-- Clearly every set in 𝒞 is open, so their union is open
convert is_open_sUnion 𝒞 _,
swap,
{ intros U H, cases H, assumption},
-- It suffices to prove that V is the union of the elements of 𝒞
{ ext x,
split,
-- let's prove inclusions in both directions
{ intro hx,
rcases h x hx with ⟨U, hU1, hU2, hU3⟩,
rw mem_sUnion,
use U,
use hU2,
exact hU3,
exact hU1 },
{ -- easy way
intro hx,
rw mem_sUnion at hx,
rcases hx with ⟨U, hUC, hxU⟩,
cases hUC with h1 h2,
apply h2 hxU }}
end⟩
-- #exit
-- begin
-- split,
-- { -- This way is easy. Say V is open.
-- intro hV,
-- -- say x ∈ V
-- intros x hx,
-- -- Want an open neighbourhood of x contained in V
-- -- let's just use V :-)
-- use V,
-- use hx,
-- use hV }, -- last goal V ⊆ V closed automatically by `refl`,
-- { intro h,
-- -- Reid Barton trick!
-- let 𝒞 : set (set X) := {U : set X | is_open U ∧ U ⊆ V},
-- -- 𝒞 doesn't just contain the neighbourhoods of x for each x ∈ V
-- -- 𝒞 contains more sets, e.g. the empty set!
-- -- Clearly every set in 𝒞 is open, so their union is open
-- convert is_open_sUnion 𝒞 _,
-- swap,
-- { tidy },
-- -- It suffices to prove that V is the union of the elements of 𝒞
-- { ext x,
-- split,
-- -- let's prove inclusions in both directions
-- { intro hx,
-- rcases h x hx with ⟨U, hU1, hU2, hU3⟩,
-- rw mem_sUnion,
-- use U,
-- use hU2,
-- exact hU3,
-- exact hU1 },
-- { -- easy way
-- intro hx,
-- rw mem_sUnion at hx,
-- rcases hx with ⟨U, hUC, hxU⟩,
-- cases hUC with h1 h2,
-- apply h2 hxU }}}
-- end
-- stream starts at 10am UK time (UTC+2)
-- Goal today
theorem is_closed_of_compact (hX : hausdorff X) {C : set X} (hC : compact C) : is_closed C :=
begin
unfold is_closed,
-- let's start with the maths proof
-- We're going to prove that Cᶜ is open by showing it's locally open
-- Let x ∈ Cᶜ i.e. x : X and x ∉ C
-- If we can find an open subset U ⊆ Cᶜ with x ∈ U then we're done
-- by the previous lemma
rw open_iff_locally_open,
intros x hx,
rw mem_compl_iff at hx,
-- Where do we find such U?
-- Now is where we use compactness.
-- We're going to cover C by a bunch of open sets
-- Where do we get the open sets?
-- We get them from Hausdorffness
-- Let's regard x as fixed.
-- Say y ∈ C (y is moving)
-- Then x ≠ y because x ∉ C
-- so by Hausdorff there exists opens U=U(y) and V=V(y)
-- disjoint, with x ∈ V and y ∈ U
-- In particular x ∉ U = U(y)
-- The union of the U(y) covers C because y ∈ C was arbitrary and y ∈ U(y)
-- So there's a finite subcover, U(y₁), U(y₂)...U(yₙ) of C
-- Now take the intersection of the corresponding V(y)'s
-- this is an open nhd of x
-- and it's disjoint from the union of the U(y)'s so it's disjoint from C
-- This V works!
-- "issue" with the maths proof -- uses the axiom of choice!
-- Grateful to Reid Barton and Andrej Bauer who independently showed
-- me a "AC removal principle" -- which makes proofs look (a) a bit slicker
-- and (b) a bit harder to remember (possibly).
-- AC removal principle says "DON'T CHOOSE! USE ALL THE CHOICES!"
-- in our actual proof we'll define a slightly different cover
-- I is the set of pairs (V,U) of open subsets of X, with
-- x ∈ V, and U ∩ V empty
let I := {VU : set X × set X //
x ∈ VU.1 ∧ is_open VU.1 ∧ is_open VU.2 ∧ VU.1 ∩ VU.2 = ∅},
-- We want to consider all the U's coming from pairs (V,U) in I
let U : I → set X := λ VUH, VUH.1.2, -- send (V,U) to U
-- My claim is that as i ranges through I, the U(i) are an open cover
-- Let's first prove they're all open
have hU1 : ∀ i : I, is_open (U i),
{ rintro ⟨⟨V, U⟩, _, _, h, _⟩,
exact h },
-- now let's prove they cover C
have hU2 : C ⊆ ⋃ i, U i,
{ intros y hy,
/-
def hausdorff (X : Type) [topological_space X] : Prop :=
∀ x y : X, x ≠ y → ∃ U V : set X, is_open U ∧ is_open V ∧ x ∈ U ∧ y ∈ V ∧ U ∩ V = ∅
-/
have hxy : x ≠ y,
{ rintro rfl,
contradiction },
-- now use that X is Hausdorff
rcases hX x y hxy with ⟨V, U, hV, hU, hxV, hyU, hUV⟩,
rw mem_Union,
-- now let's give the term of type I
use ⟨(V, U), ⟨hxV, hV, hU, hUV⟩⟩,
exact hyU },
/-
def compact (C : set X) : Prop :=
∀ (ι : Type) (U : ι → set X) (hi : ∀ i : ι, is_open (U i)) (hC : C ⊆ ⋃i, U i),
∃ F : set ι, finite F ∧ C ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ F, U i
-/
specialize hC I U hU1 hU2,
rcases hC with ⟨F, hF, hFC⟩,
-- now we have our finite subcover
-- now let's create the open nhd of x
let W := ⋂ i ∈ F, (i : I).1.1,
use W,
refine ⟨_, _, _⟩,
{ show x ∈ ⋂ (i : I) (H : i ∈ F), i.val.fst,
rw mem_bInter_iff,
rintro ⟨⟨V, U⟩, hxV, hV, hU, hUV⟩,
intro hi,
use hxV },
{ -- we're missing a lemma here
-- need a different kind of "finite intersection of opens is open"
show is_open (⋂ (i : I) (H : i ∈ F), i.val.fst),
apply is_open_bInter hF,
rintro ⟨⟨V, U⟩, hxV, hV, hU, hUV⟩,
exact hV,
},
{ rw subset_compl_comm,
rw compl_Inter,
refine set.subset.trans hFC _,
apply Union_subset_Union,
intro i,
rw compl_Inter,
apply Union_subset_Union,
rintro hi,
rcases i with ⟨⟨V, U⟩, hxV, hV, hU, hUV⟩,
show U ⊆ Vᶜ,
rw subset_compl_iff_disjoint,
rw inter_comm,
exact hUV },
end
|
bcecc60ec24e0345e3aea3de241ec6b8a768bd3e | d1a52c3f208fa42c41df8278c3d280f075eb020c | /src/Lean/Elab/Tactic/Rewrite.lean | cf135f2c9e16fd854b466dc45b8bc928fd6b8b4a | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | cipher1024/lean4 | 6e1f98bb58e7a92b28f5364eb38a14c8d0aae393 | 69114d3b50806264ef35b57394391c3e738a9822 | refs/heads/master | 1,642,227,983,603 | 1,642,011,696,000 | 1,642,011,696,000 | 228,607,691 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,576,584,269,000 | 1,576,584,268,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,480 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Rewrite
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Replace
import Lean.Elab.Tactic.Basic
import Lean.Elab.Tactic.ElabTerm
import Lean.Elab.Tactic.Location
import Lean.Elab.Tactic.Config
namespace Lean.Elab.Tactic
open Meta
def rewriteTarget (stx : Syntax) (symm : Bool) (config : Rewrite.Config) : TacticM Unit := do
Term.withSynthesize <| withMainContext do
let e ← elabTerm stx none true
let r ← rewrite (← getMainGoal) (← getMainTarget) e symm (config := config)
let mvarId' ← replaceTargetEq (← getMainGoal) r.eNew r.eqProof
replaceMainGoal (mvarId' :: r.mvarIds)
def rewriteLocalDecl (stx : Syntax) (symm : Bool) (fvarId : FVarId) (config : Rewrite.Config) : TacticM Unit := do
Term.withSynthesize <| withMainContext do
let e ← elabTerm stx none true
let localDecl ← getLocalDecl fvarId
let rwResult ← rewrite (← getMainGoal) localDecl.type e symm (config := config)
let replaceResult ← replaceLocalDecl (← getMainGoal) fvarId rwResult.eNew rwResult.eqProof
replaceMainGoal (replaceResult.mvarId :: rwResult.mvarIds)
def withRWRulesSeq (token : Syntax) (rwRulesSeqStx : Syntax) (x : (symm : Bool) → (term : Syntax) → TacticM Unit) : TacticM Unit := do
let lbrak := rwRulesSeqStx[0]
let rules := rwRulesSeqStx[1].getArgs
let rbrak := rwRulesSeqStx[2]
-- show initial state up to (incl.) `[`
withTacticInfoContext (mkNullNode #[token, lbrak]) (pure ())
let numRules := (rules.size + 1) / 2
for i in [:numRules] do
let rule := rules[i * 2]
let sep := rules.getD (i * 2 + 1) Syntax.missing
-- show rule state up to (incl.) next `,`
withTacticInfoContext (mkNullNode #[rule, sep]) do
-- show errors on rule
withRef rule do
let symm := !rule[0].isNone
let term := rule[1]
x symm term
declare_config_elab elabRewriteConfig Rewrite.Config
@[builtinTactic Lean.Parser.Tactic.rewriteSeq] def evalRewriteSeq : Tactic := fun stx => do
let cfg ← elabRewriteConfig stx[1]
let loc := expandOptLocation stx[3]
withRWRulesSeq stx[0] stx[2] fun symm term => do
withLocation loc
(rewriteLocalDecl term symm · cfg)
(rewriteTarget term symm cfg)
(throwTacticEx `rewrite . "did not find instance of the pattern in the current goal")
end Lean.Elab.Tactic
|
f0d35ae2d0d9253f14f6e2321909602855149884 | 9be442d9ec2fcf442516ed6e9e1660aa9071b7bd | /stage0/src/Lean/Meta/Injective.lean | e2abf546fe564791739e05760761cff78dbbe9d8 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | EdAyers/lean4 | 57ac632d6b0789cb91fab2170e8c9e40441221bd | 37ba0df5841bde51dbc2329da81ac23d4f6a4de4 | refs/heads/master | 1,676,463,245,298 | 1,660,619,433,000 | 1,660,619,433,000 | 183,433,437 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,657,612,672,000 | 1,556,196,574,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,725 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Meta.Transform
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Injection
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Apply
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Refl
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Cases
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Subst
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Simp.Types
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Assumption
namespace Lean.Meta
private def mkAnd? (args : Array Expr) : Option Expr := Id.run do
if args.isEmpty then
return none
else
let mut result := args.back
for arg in args.reverse[1:] do
result := mkApp2 (mkConst ``And) arg result
return result
def elimOptParam (type : Expr) : CoreM Expr := do
Core.transform type fun e =>
if e.isAppOfArity ``optParam 2 then
return TransformStep.visit (e.getArg! 0)
else
return TransformStep.visit e
private partial def mkInjectiveTheoremTypeCore? (ctorVal : ConstructorVal) (useEq : Bool) : MetaM (Option Expr) := do
let us := ctorVal.levelParams.map mkLevelParam
let type ← elimOptParam ctorVal.type
forallBoundedTelescope type ctorVal.numParams fun params type =>
forallTelescope type fun args1 resultType => do
let jp (args2 args2New : Array Expr) : MetaM (Option Expr) := do
let lhs := mkAppN (mkAppN (mkConst ctorVal.name us) params) args1
let rhs := mkAppN (mkAppN (mkConst ctorVal.name us) params) args2
let eq ← mkEq lhs rhs
let mut eqs := #[]
for arg1 in args1, arg2 in args2 do
let arg1Type ← inferType arg1
if !(← isProp arg1Type) && arg1 != arg2 then
eqs := eqs.push (← mkEqHEq arg1 arg2)
if let some andEqs := mkAnd? eqs then
let result ← if useEq then
mkEq eq andEqs
else
mkArrow eq andEqs
mkForallFVars params (← mkForallFVars args1 (← mkForallFVars args2New result))
else
return none
let rec mkArgs2 (i : Nat) (type : Expr) (args2 args2New : Array Expr) : MetaM (Option Expr) := do
if h : i < args1.size then
match (← whnf type) with
| Expr.forallE n d b _ =>
let arg1 := args1.get ⟨i, h⟩
if arg1.occurs resultType then
mkArgs2 (i + 1) (b.instantiate1 arg1) (args2.push arg1) args2New
else
withLocalDecl n (if useEq then BinderInfo.default else BinderInfo.implicit) d fun arg2 =>
mkArgs2 (i + 1) (b.instantiate1 arg2) (args2.push arg2) (args2New.push arg2)
| _ => throwError "unexpected constructor type for '{ctorVal.name}'"
else
jp args2 args2New
if useEq then
mkArgs2 0 type #[] #[]
else
withNewBinderInfos (params.map fun param => (param.fvarId!, BinderInfo.implicit)) <|
withNewBinderInfos (args1.map fun arg1 => (arg1.fvarId!, BinderInfo.implicit)) <|
mkArgs2 0 type #[] #[]
private def mkInjectiveTheoremType? (ctorVal : ConstructorVal) : MetaM (Option Expr) :=
mkInjectiveTheoremTypeCore? ctorVal false
private def injTheoremFailureHeader (ctorName : Name) : MessageData :=
m!"failed to prove injectivity theorem for constructor '{ctorName}', use 'set_option genInjectivity false' to disable the generation"
private def throwInjectiveTheoremFailure {α} (ctorName : Name) (mvarId : MVarId) : MetaM α :=
throwError "{injTheoremFailureHeader ctorName}{indentD <| MessageData.ofGoal mvarId}"
private def solveEqOfCtorEq (ctorName : Name) (mvarId : MVarId) (h : FVarId) : MetaM Unit := do
match (← injection mvarId h) with
| InjectionResult.solved => unreachable!
| InjectionResult.subgoal mvarId .. =>
(← mvarId.splitAnd).forM fun mvarId =>
unless (← mvarId.assumptionCore) do
throwInjectiveTheoremFailure ctorName mvarId
private def mkInjectiveTheoremValue (ctorName : Name) (targetType : Expr) : MetaM Expr :=
forallTelescopeReducing targetType fun xs type => do
let mvar ← mkFreshExprSyntheticOpaqueMVar type
solveEqOfCtorEq ctorName mvar.mvarId! xs.back.fvarId!
mkLambdaFVars xs mvar
def mkInjectiveTheoremNameFor (ctorName : Name) : Name :=
ctorName ++ `inj
private def mkInjectiveTheorem (ctorVal : ConstructorVal) : MetaM Unit := do
let some type ← mkInjectiveTheoremType? ctorVal
| return ()
let value ← mkInjectiveTheoremValue ctorVal.name type
let name := mkInjectiveTheoremNameFor ctorVal.name
addDecl <| Declaration.thmDecl {
name
levelParams := ctorVal.levelParams
type := (← instantiateMVars type)
value := (← instantiateMVars value)
}
def mkInjectiveEqTheoremNameFor (ctorName : Name) : Name :=
ctorName ++ `injEq
private def mkInjectiveEqTheoremType? (ctorVal : ConstructorVal) : MetaM (Option Expr) :=
mkInjectiveTheoremTypeCore? ctorVal true
private def mkInjectiveEqTheoremValue (ctorName : Name) (targetType : Expr) : MetaM Expr := do
forallTelescopeReducing targetType fun xs type => do
let mvar ← mkFreshExprSyntheticOpaqueMVar type
let [mvarId₁, mvarId₂] ← mvar.mvarId!.apply (mkConst ``Eq.propIntro)
| throwError "unexpected number of subgoals when proving injective theorem for constructor '{ctorName}'"
let (h, mvarId₁) ← mvarId₁.intro1
let (_, mvarId₂) ← mvarId₂.intro1
solveEqOfCtorEq ctorName mvarId₁ h
let mvarId₂ ← mvarId₂.casesAnd
if let some mvarId₂ ← mvarId₂.substEqs then
try mvarId₂.refl catch _ => throwError (injTheoremFailureHeader ctorName)
mkLambdaFVars xs mvar
private def mkInjectiveEqTheorem (ctorVal : ConstructorVal) : MetaM Unit := do
let some type ← mkInjectiveEqTheoremType? ctorVal
| return ()
let value ← mkInjectiveEqTheoremValue ctorVal.name type
let name := mkInjectiveEqTheoremNameFor ctorVal.name
addDecl <| Declaration.thmDecl {
name
levelParams := ctorVal.levelParams
type := (← instantiateMVars type)
value := (← instantiateMVars value)
}
addSimpTheorem (ext := simpExtension) name (post := true) (inv := false) AttributeKind.global (prio := eval_prio default)
register_builtin_option genInjectivity : Bool := {
defValue := true
descr := "generate injectivity theorems for inductive datatype constructors"
}
def mkInjectiveTheorems (declName : Name) : MetaM Unit := do
if (← getEnv).contains ``Eq.propIntro && genInjectivity.get (← getOptions) && !(← isInductivePredicate declName) then
let info ← getConstInfoInduct declName
unless info.isUnsafe do
for ctor in info.ctors do
let ctorVal ← getConstInfoCtor ctor
if ctorVal.numFields > 0 then
mkInjectiveTheorem ctorVal
mkInjectiveEqTheorem ctorVal
end Lean.Meta
|
654b6b1c6b72e72965b24bde64ced69677b2402a | f7315930643edc12e76c229a742d5446dad77097 | /tests/lean/run/tactic9.lean | ce73ab2f34468fc70be4ec9f4b01a8d9efaffffc | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | bmalehorn/lean | 8f77b762a76c59afff7b7403f9eb5fc2c3ce70c1 | 53653c352643751c4b62ff63ec5e555f11dae8eb | refs/heads/master | 1,610,945,684,489 | 1,429,681,220,000 | 1,429,681,449,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 175 | lean | import logic
open tactic
theorem tst {A B : Prop} (H1 : A) (H2 : B) : ((fun x : Prop, x) A) ∧ B ∧ A
:= by apply and.intro; beta; assumption; apply and.intro; !assumption
|
de7ca06abc3b18b769a61825920dedca4bd08083 | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/category_theory/category/galois_connection.lean | 35ab915fc0bfe36419f58df9335d7ef40d4c1aea | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,454 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Stephen Morgan, Scott Morrison, Johannes Hölzl, Reid Barton
-/
import category_theory.category.preorder
import category_theory.adjunction.basic
import order.galois_connection
/-!
# Galois connections between preorders are adjunctions.
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
* `galois_connection.adjunction` is the adjunction associated to a galois connection.
-/
universes u v
section
variables {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} [preorder X] [preorder Y]
/--
A galois connection between preorders induces an adjunction between the associated categories.
-/
def galois_connection.adjunction {l : X → Y} {u : Y → X} (gc : galois_connection l u) :
gc.monotone_l.functor ⊣ gc.monotone_u.functor :=
category_theory.adjunction.mk_of_hom_equiv
{ hom_equiv := λ X Y, ⟨λ f, (gc.le_u f.le).hom, λ f, (gc.l_le f.le).hom, by tidy, by tidy⟩ }
end
namespace category_theory
variables {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} [preorder X] [preorder Y]
/--
An adjunction between preorder categories induces a galois connection.
-/
lemma adjunction.gc {L : X ⥤ Y} {R : Y ⥤ X} (adj : L ⊣ R) :
galois_connection L.obj R.obj :=
λ x y, ⟨λ h, ((adj.hom_equiv x y).to_fun h.hom).le, λ h, ((adj.hom_equiv x y).inv_fun h.hom).le⟩
end category_theory
|
a4a47f49f9593b42dd52b64d705a1fba0ef8a9d3 | a9d0fb7b0e4f802bd3857b803e6c5c23d87fef91 | /hott/cubical/squareover.hlean | e3d0484877b5732a1761fb0ca910ba4d73259fde | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean-osx | 4a954262c780e404c1369d6c06516161d07fcb40 | 3670278342d2f4faa49d95b46d86642d7875b47c | refs/heads/master | 1,611,410,334,552 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 12,043,103 | 5 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 15,645 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Floris van Doorn
Squareovers
-/
import .square
open eq equiv is_equiv
namespace eq
-- we give the argument B explicitly, because Lean would find (λa, B a) by itself, which
-- makes the type uglier (of course the two terms are definitionally equal)
inductive squareover {A : Type} (B : A → Type) {a₀₀ : A} {b₀₀ : B a₀₀} :
Π{a₂₀ a₀₂ a₂₂ : A}
{p₁₀ : a₀₀ = a₂₀} {p₁₂ : a₀₂ = a₂₂} {p₀₁ : a₀₀ = a₀₂} {p₂₁ : a₂₀ = a₂₂}
(s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁)
{b₂₀ : B a₂₀} {b₀₂ : B a₀₂} {b₂₂ : B a₂₂}
(q₁₀ : pathover B b₀₀ p₁₀ b₂₀) (q₁₂ : pathover B b₀₂ p₁₂ b₂₂)
(q₀₁ : pathover B b₀₀ p₀₁ b₀₂) (q₂₁ : pathover B b₂₀ p₂₁ b₂₂),
Type :=
idsquareo : squareover B ids idpo idpo idpo idpo
variables {A A' : Type} {B : A → Type}
{a a' a'' a₀₀ a₂₀ a₄₀ a₀₂ a₂₂ a₂₄ a₀₄ a₄₂ a₄₄ : A}
/-a₀₀-/ {p₁₀ : a₀₀ = a₂₀} /-a₂₀-/ {p₃₀ : a₂₀ = a₄₀} /-a₄₀-/
{p₀₁ : a₀₀ = a₀₂} /-s₁₁-/ {p₂₁ : a₂₀ = a₂₂} /-s₃₁-/ {p₄₁ : a₄₀ = a₄₂}
/-a₀₂-/ {p₁₂ : a₀₂ = a₂₂} /-a₂₂-/ {p₃₂ : a₂₂ = a₄₂} /-a₄₂-/
{p₀₃ : a₀₂ = a₀₄} /-s₁₃-/ {p₂₃ : a₂₂ = a₂₄} /-s₃₃-/ {p₄₃ : a₄₂ = a₄₄}
/-a₀₄-/ {p₁₄ : a₀₄ = a₂₄} /-a₂₄-/ {p₃₄ : a₂₄ = a₄₄} /-a₄₄-/
{s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁} {s₃₁ : square p₃₀ p₃₂ p₂₁ p₄₁}
{s₁₃ : square p₁₂ p₁₄ p₀₃ p₂₃} {s₃₃ : square p₃₂ p₃₄ p₂₃ p₄₃}
{b₀₀ : B a₀₀} {b₂₀ : B a₂₀} {b₄₀ : B a₄₀}
{b₀₂ : B a₀₂} {b₂₂ : B a₂₂} {b₄₂ : B a₄₂}
{b₀₄ : B a₀₄} {b₂₄ : B a₂₄} {b₄₄ : B a₄₄}
/-b₀₀-/ {q₁₀ : b₀₀ =[p₁₀] b₂₀} /-b₂₀-/ {q₃₀ : b₂₀ =[p₃₀] b₄₀} /-b₄₀-/
{q₀₁ : b₀₀ =[p₀₁] b₀₂} /-t₁₁-/ {q₂₁ : b₂₀ =[p₂₁] b₂₂} /-t₃₁-/ {q₄₁ : b₄₀ =[p₄₁] b₄₂}
/-b₀₂-/ {q₁₂ : b₀₂ =[p₁₂] b₂₂} /-b₂₂-/ {q₃₂ : b₂₂ =[p₃₂] b₄₂} /-b₄₂-/
{q₀₃ : b₀₂ =[p₀₃] b₀₄} /-t₁₃-/ {q₂₃ : b₂₂ =[p₂₃] b₂₄} /-t₃₃-/ {q₄₃ : b₄₂ =[p₄₃] b₄₄}
/-b₀₄-/ {q₁₄ : b₀₄ =[p₁₄] b₂₄} /-b₂₄-/ {q₃₄ : b₂₄ =[p₃₄] b₄₄} /-b₄₄-/
definition squareo := @squareover A B a₀₀
definition idsquareo [reducible] [constructor] (b₀₀ : B a₀₀) := @squareover.idsquareo A B a₀₀ b₀₀
definition idso [reducible] [constructor] := @squareover.idsquareo A B a₀₀ b₀₀
definition apds (f : Πa, B a) (s : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁)
: squareover B s (apdo f p₁₀) (apdo f p₁₂) (apdo f p₀₁) (apdo f p₂₁) :=
square.rec_on s idso
definition vrflo : squareover B vrfl q₁₀ q₁₀ idpo idpo :=
by induction q₁₀; exact idso
definition hrflo : squareover B hrfl idpo idpo q₁₀ q₁₀ :=
by induction q₁₀; exact idso
definition vdeg_squareover {p₁₀'} {s : p₁₀ = p₁₀'} {q₁₀' : b₀₀ =[p₁₀'] b₂₀}
(r : change_path s q₁₀ = q₁₀')
: squareover B (vdeg_square s) q₁₀ q₁₀' idpo idpo :=
by induction s; esimp at *; induction r; exact vrflo
definition hdeg_squareover {p₀₁'} {s : p₀₁ = p₀₁'} {q₀₁' : b₀₀ =[p₀₁'] b₀₂}
(r : change_path s q₀₁ = q₀₁')
: squareover B (hdeg_square s) idpo idpo q₀₁ q₀₁' :=
by induction s; esimp at *; induction r; exact hrflo
definition hconcato
(t₁₁ : squareover B s₁₁ q₁₀ q₁₂ q₀₁ q₂₁) (t₃₁ : squareover B s₃₁ q₃₀ q₃₂ q₂₁ q₄₁)
: squareover B (hconcat s₁₁ s₃₁) (q₁₀ ⬝o q₃₀) (q₁₂ ⬝o q₃₂) q₀₁ q₄₁ :=
by induction t₃₁; exact t₁₁
definition vconcato
(t₁₁ : squareover B s₁₁ q₁₀ q₁₂ q₀₁ q₂₁) (t₁₃ : squareover B s₁₃ q₁₂ q₁₄ q₀₃ q₂₃)
: squareover B (vconcat s₁₁ s₁₃) q₁₀ q₁₄ (q₀₁ ⬝o q₀₃) (q₂₁ ⬝o q₂₃) :=
by induction t₁₃; exact t₁₁
definition hinverseo (t₁₁ : squareover B s₁₁ q₁₀ q₁₂ q₀₁ q₂₁)
: squareover B (hinverse s₁₁) q₁₀⁻¹ᵒ q₁₂⁻¹ᵒ q₂₁ q₀₁ :=
by induction t₁₁; constructor
definition vinverseo (t₁₁ : squareover B s₁₁ q₁₀ q₁₂ q₀₁ q₂₁)
: squareover B (vinverse s₁₁) q₁₂ q₁₀ q₀₁⁻¹ᵒ q₂₁⁻¹ᵒ :=
by induction t₁₁; constructor
definition eq_vconcato {q : b₀₀ =[p₁₀] b₂₀}
(r : q = q₁₀) (t₁₁ : squareover B s₁₁ q₁₀ q₁₂ q₀₁ q₂₁) : squareover B s₁₁ q q₁₂ q₀₁ q₂₁ :=
by induction r; exact t₁₁
definition vconcato_eq {q : b₀₂ =[p₁₂] b₂₂}
(t₁₁ : squareover B s₁₁ q₁₀ q₁₂ q₀₁ q₂₁) (r : q₁₂ = q) : squareover B s₁₁ q₁₀ q q₀₁ q₂₁ :=
by induction r; exact t₁₁
definition eq_hconcato {q : b₀₀ =[p₀₁] b₀₂}
(r : q = q₀₁) (t₁₁ : squareover B s₁₁ q₁₀ q₁₂ q₀₁ q₂₁) : squareover B s₁₁ q₁₀ q₁₂ q q₂₁ :=
by induction r; exact t₁₁
definition hconcato_eq {q : b₂₀ =[p₂₁] b₂₂}
(t₁₁ : squareover B s₁₁ q₁₀ q₁₂ q₀₁ q₂₁) (r : q₂₁ = q) : squareover B s₁₁ q₁₀ q₁₂ q₀₁ q :=
by induction r; exact t₁₁
definition pathover_vconcato {p : a₀₀ = a₂₀} {sp : p = p₁₀} {q : b₀₀ =[p] b₂₀}
(r : change_path sp q = q₁₀) (t₁₁ : squareover B s₁₁ q₁₀ q₁₂ q₀₁ q₂₁)
: squareover B (sp ⬝pv s₁₁) q q₁₂ q₀₁ q₂₁ :=
by induction sp; induction r; exact t₁₁
definition vconcato_pathover {p : a₀₂ = a₂₂} {sp : p₁₂ = p} {q : b₀₂ =[p] b₂₂}
(t₁₁ : squareover B s₁₁ q₁₀ q₁₂ q₀₁ q₂₁) (r : change_path sp q₁₂ = q)
: squareover B (s₁₁ ⬝vp sp) q₁₀ q q₀₁ q₂₁ :=
by induction sp; induction r; exact t₁₁
definition pathover_hconcato {p : a₀₀ = a₀₂} {sp : p = p₀₁} {q : b₀₀ =[p] b₀₂}
(r : change_path sp q = q₀₁) (t₁₁ : squareover B s₁₁ q₁₀ q₁₂ q₀₁ q₂₁) :
squareover B (sp ⬝ph s₁₁) q₁₀ q₁₂ q q₂₁ :=
by induction sp; induction r; exact t₁₁
definition hconcato_pathover {p : a₂₀ = a₂₂} {sp : p₂₁ = p} {q : b₂₀ =[p] b₂₂}
(t₁₁ : squareover B s₁₁ q₁₀ q₁₂ q₀₁ q₂₁) (r : change_path sp q₂₁ = q) :
squareover B (s₁₁ ⬝hp sp) q₁₀ q₁₂ q₀₁ q :=
by induction sp; induction r; exact t₁₁
-- relating squareovers to squares
definition square_of_squareover (t₁₁ : squareover B s₁₁ q₁₀ q₁₂ q₀₁ q₂₁) :
square (!con_tr ⬝ ap (λa, p₂₁ ▸ a) (tr_eq_of_pathover q₁₀))
(tr_eq_of_pathover q₁₂)
(ap (λq, q ▸ b₀₀) (eq_of_square s₁₁) ⬝ !con_tr ⬝ ap (λa, p₁₂ ▸ a) (tr_eq_of_pathover q₀₁))
(tr_eq_of_pathover q₂₁) :=
by induction t₁₁; esimp; constructor
/-
definition squareover_of_square
(q : square (!con_tr ⬝ ap (λa, p₂₁ ▸ a) (tr_eq_of_pathover q₁₀))
(tr_eq_of_pathover q₁₂)
(ap (λq, q ▸ b₀₀) (eq_of_square s₁₁) ⬝ !con_tr ⬝ ap (λa, p₁₂ ▸ a) (tr_eq_of_pathover q₀₁))
(tr_eq_of_pathover q₂₁))
: squareover B s₁₁ q₁₀ q₁₂ q₀₁ q₂₁ :=
sorry
-/
definition square_of_squareover_ids {b₀₀ b₀₂ b₂₀ b₂₂ : B a}
{t : b₀₀ = b₂₀} {b : b₀₂ = b₂₂} {l : b₀₀ = b₀₂} {r : b₂₀ = b₂₂}
(so : squareover B ids (pathover_idp_of_eq t)
(pathover_idp_of_eq b)
(pathover_idp_of_eq l)
(pathover_idp_of_eq r)) : square t b l r :=
begin
note H := square_of_squareover so, -- use apply ... in
rewrite [▸* at H,+idp_con at H,+ap_id at H,↑pathover_idp_of_eq at H],
rewrite [+to_right_inv !(pathover_equiv_tr_eq (refl a)) at H],
exact H
end
definition squareover_ids_of_square {b₀₀ b₀₂ b₂₀ b₂₂ : B a}
{t : b₀₀ = b₂₀} {b : b₀₂ = b₂₂} {l : b₀₀ = b₀₂} {r : b₂₀ = b₂₂} (q : square t b l r)
: squareover B ids (pathover_idp_of_eq t)
(pathover_idp_of_eq b)
(pathover_idp_of_eq l)
(pathover_idp_of_eq r) :=
square.rec_on q idso
-- relating pathovers to squareovers
definition pathover_of_squareover' (t₁₁ : squareover B s₁₁ q₁₀ q₁₂ q₀₁ q₂₁)
: q₁₀ ⬝o q₂₁ =[eq_of_square s₁₁] q₀₁ ⬝o q₁₂ :=
by induction t₁₁; constructor
definition pathover_of_squareover {s : p₁₀ ⬝ p₂₁ = p₀₁ ⬝ p₁₂}
(t₁₁ : squareover B (square_of_eq s) q₁₀ q₁₂ q₀₁ q₂₁)
: q₁₀ ⬝o q₂₁ =[s] q₀₁ ⬝o q₁₂ :=
begin
revert s t₁₁, refine equiv_rect' !square_equiv_eq⁻¹ᵉ (λa b, squareover B b _ _ _ _ → _) _,
intro s, exact pathover_of_squareover'
end
definition squareover_of_pathover {s : p₁₀ ⬝ p₂₁ = p₀₁ ⬝ p₁₂}
(r : q₁₀ ⬝o q₂₁ =[s] q₀₁ ⬝o q₁₂) : squareover B (square_of_eq s) q₁₀ q₁₂ q₀₁ q₂₁ :=
by induction q₁₂; esimp [concato] at r;induction r;induction q₂₁;induction q₁₀;constructor
definition pathover_top_of_squareover (t₁₁ : squareover B s₁₁ q₁₀ q₁₂ q₀₁ q₂₁)
: q₁₀ =[eq_top_of_square s₁₁] q₀₁ ⬝o q₁₂ ⬝o q₂₁⁻¹ᵒ :=
by induction t₁₁; constructor
definition squareover_of_pathover_top {s : p₁₀ = p₀₁ ⬝ p₁₂ ⬝ p₂₁⁻¹}
(r : q₁₀ =[s] q₀₁ ⬝o q₁₂ ⬝o q₂₁⁻¹ᵒ)
: squareover B (square_of_eq_top s) q₁₀ q₁₂ q₀₁ q₂₁ :=
by induction q₂₁; induction q₁₂; esimp at r;induction r;induction q₁₀;constructor
definition pathover_of_hdeg_squareover {p₀₁' : a₀₀ = a₀₂} {r : p₀₁ = p₀₁'} {q₀₁' : b₀₀ =[p₀₁'] b₀₂}
(t : squareover B (hdeg_square r) idpo idpo q₀₁ q₀₁') : q₀₁ =[r] q₀₁' :=
by induction r; induction q₀₁'; exact (pathover_of_squareover' t)⁻¹ᵒ
definition pathover_of_vdeg_squareover {p₁₀' : a₀₀ = a₂₀} {r : p₁₀ = p₁₀'} {q₁₀' : b₀₀ =[p₁₀'] b₂₀}
(t : squareover B (vdeg_square r) q₁₀ q₁₀' idpo idpo) : q₁₀ =[r] q₁₀' :=
by induction r; induction q₁₀'; exact pathover_of_squareover' t
definition squareover_of_eq_top (r : change_path (eq_top_of_square s₁₁) q₁₀ = q₀₁ ⬝o q₁₂ ⬝o q₂₁⁻¹ᵒ)
: squareover B s₁₁ q₁₀ q₁₂ q₀₁ q₂₁ :=
begin
induction s₁₁, revert q₁₂ q₁₀ r,
eapply idp_rec_on q₂₁, clear q₂₁,
intro q₁₂,
eapply idp_rec_on q₁₂, clear q₁₂,
esimp, intros,
induction r, eapply idp_rec_on q₁₀,
constructor
end
definition eq_top_of_squareover (r : squareover B s₁₁ q₁₀ q₁₂ q₀₁ q₂₁)
: change_path (eq_top_of_square s₁₁) q₁₀ = q₀₁ ⬝o q₁₂ ⬝o q₂₁⁻¹ᵒ :=
by induction r; reflexivity
definition change_square {s₁₁'} (p : s₁₁ = s₁₁') (r : squareover B s₁₁ q₁₀ q₁₂ q₀₁ q₂₁)
: squareover B s₁₁' q₁₀ q₁₂ q₀₁ q₂₁ :=
p ▸ r
/-
definition squareover_equiv_pathover (q₁₀ : b₀₀ =[p₁₀] b₂₀) (q₁₂ : b₀₂ =[p₁₂] b₂₂)
(q₀₁ : b₀₀ =[p₀₁] b₀₂) (q₂₁ : b₂₀ =[p₂₁] b₂₂)
: squareover B s₁₁ q₁₀ q₁₂ q₀₁ q₂₁ ≃ q₁₀ ⬝o q₂₁ =[eq_of_square s₁₁] q₀₁ ⬝o q₁₂ :=
begin
fapply equiv.MK,
{ exact pathover_of_squareover},
{ intro r, rewrite [-to_left_inv !square_equiv_eq s₁₁], apply squareover_of_pathover, exact r},
{ intro r, }, --need characterization of squareover lying over ids.
{ intro s, induction s, apply idp},
end
-/
definition eq_of_vdeg_squareover {q₁₀' : b₀₀ =[p₁₀] b₂₀}
(p : squareover B vrfl q₁₀ q₁₀' idpo idpo) : q₁₀ = q₁₀' :=
begin
note H := square_of_squareover p, -- use apply ... in
induction p₁₀, -- if needed we can remove this induction and use con_tr_idp in types/eq2
rewrite [▸* at H,idp_con at H,+ap_id at H],
let H' := eq_of_vdeg_square H,
exact eq_of_fn_eq_fn !pathover_equiv_tr_eq H'
end
-- definition vdeg_tr_squareover {q₁₂ : p₀₁ ▸ b₀₀ =[p₁₂] p₂₁ ▸ b₂₀} (r : q₁₀ =[_] q₁₂)
-- : squareover B s₁₁ q₁₀ q₁₂ !pathover_tr !pathover_tr :=
-- by induction p;exact vrflo
/- A version of eq_pathover where the type of the equality also varies -/
definition eq_pathover_dep {f g : Πa, B a} {p : a = a'} {q : f a = g a}
{r : f a' = g a'} (s : squareover B hrfl (pathover_idp_of_eq q) (pathover_idp_of_eq r)
(apdo f p) (apdo g p)) : q =[p] r :=
begin
induction p, apply pathover_idp_of_eq, apply eq_of_vdeg_square, exact square_of_squareover_ids s
end
/- charcaterization of pathovers in pathovers -/
-- in this version the fibration (B) of the pathover does not depend on the variable (a)
definition pathover_pathover {a' a₂' : A'} {p : a' = a₂'} {f g : A' → A}
{b : Πa, B (f a)} {b₂ : Πa, B (g a)} {q : Π(a' : A'), f a' = g a'}
(r : pathover B (b a') (q a') (b₂ a'))
(r₂ : pathover B (b a₂') (q a₂') (b₂ a₂'))
(s : squareover B (natural_square_tr q p) r r₂
(pathover_ap B f (apdo b p)) (pathover_ap B g (apdo b₂ p)))
: pathover (λa, pathover B (b a) (q a) (b₂ a)) r p r₂ :=
begin
induction p, esimp at s, apply pathover_idp_of_eq, apply eq_of_vdeg_squareover, exact s
end
definition squareover_change_path_left {p₀₁' : a₀₀ = a₀₂} (r : p₀₁' = p₀₁)
{q₀₁ : b₀₀ =[p₀₁'] b₀₂} (t : squareover B (r ⬝ph s₁₁) q₁₀ q₁₂ q₀₁ q₂₁)
: squareover B s₁₁ q₁₀ q₁₂ (change_path r q₀₁) q₂₁ :=
by induction r; exact t
definition squareover_change_path_right {p₂₁' : a₂₀ = a₂₂} (r : p₂₁' = p₂₁)
{q₂₁ : b₂₀ =[p₂₁'] b₂₂} (t : squareover B (s₁₁ ⬝hp r⁻¹) q₁₀ q₁₂ q₀₁ q₂₁)
: squareover B s₁₁ q₁₀ q₁₂ q₀₁ (change_path r q₂₁) :=
by induction r; exact t
definition squareover_change_path_right' {p₂₁' : a₂₀ = a₂₂} (r : p₂₁ = p₂₁')
{q₂₁ : b₂₀ =[p₂₁'] b₂₂} (t : squareover B (s₁₁ ⬝hp r) q₁₀ q₁₂ q₀₁ q₂₁)
: squareover B s₁₁ q₁₀ q₁₂ q₀₁ (change_path r⁻¹ q₂₁) :=
by induction r; exact t
end eq
|
aa85769c8f7d21b48a7445795404ae8a62aab8ac | b7f22e51856f4989b970961f794f1c435f9b8f78 | /tests/lean/run/ctx.lean | 4475e0e72229fd2ef43e15cdcfde51bf3440fb5b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean | cb8aa01055ffe2af0fb99a16b4cda8463b882cd1 | 38607e3eb57f57f77c0ac114ad169e9e4262e24f | refs/heads/master | 1,611,187,284,081 | 1,450,766,737,000 | 1,476,122,547,000 | 11,513,992 | 2 | 0 | null | 1,401,763,102,000 | 1,374,182,235,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 363 | lean | import data.nat
open nat inhabited
constant N : Type.{1}
constant a : N
section s1
set_option pp.implicit true
definition f (a b : nat) := a
theorem nat_inhabited [instance] : inhabited nat :=
inhabited.mk zero
definition to_N [coercion] (n : nat) : N := a
infixl `$$`:65 := f
end s1
theorem tst : inhabited nat
constants n m : nat
check n = a
|
ce137f6a1ed627ca5a2f5b19af3168a8973b93f7 | 5ae26df177f810c5006841e9c73dc56e01b978d7 | /src/algebraic_geometry/stalks.lean | 3728a23be73d85a54f1a5e0bf0a4dcc89b0ad847 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ChrisHughes24/mathlib | 98322577c460bc6b1fe5c21f42ce33ad1c3e5558 | a2a867e827c2a6702beb9efc2b9282bd801d5f9a | refs/heads/master | 1,583,848,251,477 | 1,565,164,247,000 | 1,565,164,247,000 | 129,409,993 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,565,164,817,000 | 1,523,628,059,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,900 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import algebraic_geometry.presheafed_space
import topology.Top.stalks
/-!
# Stalks for presheaved spaces
This file lifts constructions of stalks and pushforwards of stalks to work with
the category of presheafed spaces.
-/
universes v u v' u'
open category_theory
open category_theory.limits category_theory.category category_theory.functor
open algebraic_geometry
open topological_space
variables {C : Type u} [𝒞 : category.{v+1} C] [has_colimits.{v} C]
include 𝒞
local attribute [tidy] tactic.op_induction'
open Top.presheaf
namespace algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace
def stalk (X : PresheafedSpace.{v} C) (x : X) : C := X.𝒪.stalk x
def stalk_map {X Y : PresheafedSpace.{v} C} (α : X ⟶ Y) (x : X) : Y.stalk (α x) ⟶ X.stalk x :=
(stalk_functor C (α x)).map (α.c) ≫ X.𝒪.stalk_pushforward C α x
namespace stalk_map
@[simp] lemma id (X : PresheafedSpace.{v} C) (x : X) : stalk_map (𝟙 X) x = 𝟙 (X.stalk x) :=
begin
dsimp [stalk_map],
simp only [stalk_pushforward.id],
rw [←map_comp],
convert (stalk_functor C x).map_id X.𝒪,
tidy,
end
.
@[simp] lemma comp {X Y Z : PresheafedSpace.{v} C} (α : X ⟶ Y) (β : Y ⟶ Z) (x : X) :
stalk_map (α ≫ β) x =
(stalk_map β (α x) : Z.stalk (β (α x)) ⟶ Y.stalk (α x)) ≫
(stalk_map α x : Y.stalk (α x) ⟶ X.stalk x) :=
begin
dsimp [stalk_map, stalk_functor, stalk_pushforward],
ext U,
op_induction U,
cases U,
simp only [colim.ι_map_assoc, colimit.ι_pre_assoc, colimit.ι_pre,
whisker_left.app, whisker_right.app,
assoc, id_comp, map_id, map_comp],
dsimp,
simp only [map_id, assoc],
-- FIXME Why doesn't simp do this:
erw [id_comp, id_comp],
end
end stalk_map
end algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace
|
268e74c7425253fe8a039dad3b8894f0ea2ec3f0 | c777c32c8e484e195053731103c5e52af26a25d1 | /src/analysis/convex/cone/basic.lean | ca62b0911010ef52bf22850a1e32995f219d53b2 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kbuzzard/mathlib | 2ff9e85dfe2a46f4b291927f983afec17e946eb8 | 58537299e922f9c77df76cb613910914a479c1f7 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,313,702,744 | 1,683,974,212,000 | 1,683,974,212,000 | 128,185,277 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,522,920,600,000 | 1,522,920,600,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 37,191 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import analysis.inner_product_space.projection
/-!
# Convex cones
In a `𝕜`-module `E`, we define a convex cone as a set `s` such that `a • x + b • y ∈ s` whenever
`x, y ∈ s` and `a, b > 0`. We prove that convex cones form a `complete_lattice`, and define their
images (`convex_cone.map`) and preimages (`convex_cone.comap`) under linear maps.
We define pointed, blunt, flat and salient cones, and prove the correspondence between
convex cones and ordered modules.
We define `convex.to_cone` to be the minimal cone that includes a given convex set.
We define `set.inner_dual_cone` to be the cone consisting of all points `y` such that for
all points `x` in a given set `0 ≤ ⟪ x, y ⟫`.
## Main statements
We prove two extension theorems:
* `riesz_extension`:
[M. Riesz extension theorem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M._Riesz_extension_theorem) says that
if `s` is a convex cone in a real vector space `E`, `p` is a submodule of `E`
such that `p + s = E`, and `f` is a linear function `p → ℝ` which is
nonnegative on `p ∩ s`, then there exists a globally defined linear function
`g : E → ℝ` that agrees with `f` on `p`, and is nonnegative on `s`.
* `exists_extension_of_le_sublinear`:
Hahn-Banach theorem: if `N : E → ℝ` is a sublinear map, `f` is a linear map
defined on a subspace of `E`, and `f x ≤ N x` for all `x` in the domain of `f`,
then `f` can be extended to the whole space to a linear map `g` such that `g x ≤ N x`
for all `x`
We prove the following theorems:
* `convex_cone.hyperplane_separation_of_nonempty_of_is_closed_of_nmem`:
This variant of the
[hyperplane separation theorem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperplane_separation_theorem)
states that given a nonempty, closed, convex cone `K` in a complete, real inner product space `H`
and a point `b` disjoint from it, there is a vector `y` which separates `b` from `K` in the sense
that for all points `x` in `K`, `0 ≤ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ` and `⟪y, b⟫_ℝ < 0`. This is also a geometric
interpretation of the
[Farkas lemma](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farkas%27_lemma#Geometric_interpretation).
* `convex_cone.inner_dual_cone_of_inner_dual_cone_eq_self`:
The `inner_dual_cone` of the `inner_dual_cone` of a nonempty, closed, convex cone is itself.
## Implementation notes
While `convex 𝕜` is a predicate on sets, `convex_cone 𝕜 E` is a bundled convex cone.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convex_cone
* [Stephen P. Boyd and Lieven Vandenberghe, *Convex Optimization*][boydVandenberghe2004]
* [Emo Welzl and Bernd Gärtner, *Cone Programming*][welzl_garter]
-/
open set linear_map
open_locale classical pointwise
variables {𝕜 E F G : Type*}
/-! ### Definition of `convex_cone` and basic properties -/
section definitions
variables (𝕜 E) [ordered_semiring 𝕜]
/-- A convex cone is a subset `s` of a `𝕜`-module such that `a • x + b • y ∈ s` whenever `a, b > 0`
and `x, y ∈ s`. -/
structure convex_cone [add_comm_monoid E] [has_smul 𝕜 E] :=
(carrier : set E)
(smul_mem' : ∀ ⦃c : 𝕜⦄, 0 < c → ∀ ⦃x : E⦄, x ∈ carrier → c • x ∈ carrier)
(add_mem' : ∀ ⦃x⦄ (hx : x ∈ carrier) ⦃y⦄ (hy : y ∈ carrier), x + y ∈ carrier)
end definitions
variables {𝕜 E}
namespace convex_cone
section ordered_semiring
variables [ordered_semiring 𝕜] [add_comm_monoid E]
section has_smul
variables [has_smul 𝕜 E] (S T : convex_cone 𝕜 E)
instance : set_like (convex_cone 𝕜 E) E :=
{ coe := carrier,
coe_injective' := λ S T h, by cases S; cases T; congr' }
@[simp] lemma coe_mk {s : set E} {h₁ h₂} : ↑(@mk 𝕜 _ _ _ _ s h₁ h₂) = s := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_mk {s : set E} {h₁ h₂ x} : x ∈ @mk 𝕜 _ _ _ _ s h₁ h₂ ↔ x ∈ s := iff.rfl
/-- Two `convex_cone`s are equal if they have the same elements. -/
@[ext] theorem ext {S T : convex_cone 𝕜 E} (h : ∀ x, x ∈ S ↔ x ∈ T) : S = T := set_like.ext h
lemma smul_mem {c : 𝕜} {x : E} (hc : 0 < c) (hx : x ∈ S) : c • x ∈ S := S.smul_mem' hc hx
lemma add_mem ⦃x⦄ (hx : x ∈ S) ⦃y⦄ (hy : y ∈ S) : x + y ∈ S := S.add_mem' hx hy
instance : add_mem_class (convex_cone 𝕜 E) E :=
{ add_mem := λ c a b ha hb, add_mem c ha hb }
instance : has_inf (convex_cone 𝕜 E) :=
⟨λ S T, ⟨S ∩ T, λ c hc x hx, ⟨S.smul_mem hc hx.1, T.smul_mem hc hx.2⟩,
λ x hx y hy, ⟨S.add_mem hx.1 hy.1, T.add_mem hx.2 hy.2⟩⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_inf : ((S ⊓ T : convex_cone 𝕜 E) : set E) = ↑S ∩ ↑T := rfl
lemma mem_inf {x} : x ∈ S ⊓ T ↔ x ∈ S ∧ x ∈ T := iff.rfl
instance : has_Inf (convex_cone 𝕜 E) :=
⟨λ S, ⟨⋂ s ∈ S, ↑s,
λ c hc x hx, mem_bInter $ λ s hs, s.smul_mem hc $ mem_Inter₂.1 hx s hs,
λ x hx y hy, mem_bInter $ λ s hs, s.add_mem (mem_Inter₂.1 hx s hs) (mem_Inter₂.1 hy s hs)⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_Inf (S : set (convex_cone 𝕜 E)) : ↑(Inf S) = ⋂ s ∈ S, (s : set E) := rfl
lemma mem_Inf {x : E} {S : set (convex_cone 𝕜 E)} : x ∈ Inf S ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, x ∈ s := mem_Inter₂
@[simp] lemma coe_infi {ι : Sort*} (f : ι → convex_cone 𝕜 E) : ↑(infi f) = ⋂ i, (f i : set E) :=
by simp [infi]
lemma mem_infi {ι : Sort*} {x : E} {f : ι → convex_cone 𝕜 E} : x ∈ infi f ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ f i :=
mem_Inter₂.trans $ by simp
variables (𝕜)
instance : has_bot (convex_cone 𝕜 E) := ⟨⟨∅, λ c hc x, false.elim, λ x, false.elim⟩⟩
lemma mem_bot (x : E) : x ∈ (⊥ : convex_cone 𝕜 E) = false := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_bot : ↑(⊥ : convex_cone 𝕜 E) = (∅ : set E) := rfl
instance : has_top (convex_cone 𝕜 E) := ⟨⟨univ, λ c hc x hx, mem_univ _, λ x hx y hy, mem_univ _⟩⟩
lemma mem_top (x : E) : x ∈ (⊤ : convex_cone 𝕜 E) := mem_univ x
@[simp] lemma coe_top : ↑(⊤ : convex_cone 𝕜 E) = (univ : set E) := rfl
instance : complete_lattice (convex_cone 𝕜 E) :=
{ le := (≤),
lt := (<),
bot := (⊥),
bot_le := λ S x, false.elim,
top := (⊤),
le_top := λ S x hx, mem_top 𝕜 x,
inf := (⊓),
Inf := has_Inf.Inf,
sup := λ a b, Inf {x | a ≤ x ∧ b ≤ x},
Sup := λ s, Inf {T | ∀ S ∈ s, S ≤ T},
le_sup_left := λ a b, λ x hx, mem_Inf.2 $ λ s hs, hs.1 hx,
le_sup_right := λ a b, λ x hx, mem_Inf.2 $ λ s hs, hs.2 hx,
sup_le := λ a b c ha hb x hx, mem_Inf.1 hx c ⟨ha, hb⟩,
le_inf := λ a b c ha hb x hx, ⟨ha hx, hb hx⟩,
inf_le_left := λ a b x, and.left,
inf_le_right := λ a b x, and.right,
le_Sup := λ s p hs x hx, mem_Inf.2 $ λ t ht, ht p hs hx,
Sup_le := λ s p hs x hx, mem_Inf.1 hx p hs,
le_Inf := λ s a ha x hx, mem_Inf.2 $ λ t ht, ha t ht hx,
Inf_le := λ s a ha x hx, mem_Inf.1 hx _ ha,
.. set_like.partial_order }
instance : inhabited (convex_cone 𝕜 E) := ⟨⊥⟩
end has_smul
section module
variables [module 𝕜 E] (S : convex_cone 𝕜 E)
protected lemma convex : convex 𝕜 (S : set E) :=
convex_iff_forall_pos.2 $ λ x hx y hy a b ha hb _, S.add_mem (S.smul_mem ha hx) (S.smul_mem hb hy)
end module
end ordered_semiring
section linear_ordered_field
variables [linear_ordered_field 𝕜]
section add_comm_monoid
variables [add_comm_monoid E] [add_comm_monoid F] [add_comm_monoid G]
section mul_action
variables [mul_action 𝕜 E] (S : convex_cone 𝕜 E)
lemma smul_mem_iff {c : 𝕜} (hc : 0 < c) {x : E} :
c • x ∈ S ↔ x ∈ S :=
⟨λ h, inv_smul_smul₀ hc.ne' x ▸ S.smul_mem (inv_pos.2 hc) h, S.smul_mem hc⟩
end mul_action
section module
variables [module 𝕜 E] [module 𝕜 F] [module 𝕜 G]
/-- The image of a convex cone under a `𝕜`-linear map is a convex cone. -/
def map (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) (S : convex_cone 𝕜 E) : convex_cone 𝕜 F :=
{ carrier := f '' S,
smul_mem' := λ c hc y ⟨x, hx, hy⟩, hy ▸ f.map_smul c x ▸ mem_image_of_mem f (S.smul_mem hc hx),
add_mem' := λ y₁ ⟨x₁, hx₁, hy₁⟩ y₂ ⟨x₂, hx₂, hy₂⟩, hy₁ ▸ hy₂ ▸ f.map_add x₁ x₂ ▸
mem_image_of_mem f (S.add_mem hx₁ hx₂) }
@[simp] lemma mem_map {f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F} {S : convex_cone 𝕜 E} {y : F} :
y ∈ S.map f ↔ ∃ x ∈ S, f x = y :=
mem_image_iff_bex
lemma map_map (g : F →ₗ[𝕜] G) (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) (S : convex_cone 𝕜 E) :
(S.map f).map g = S.map (g.comp f) :=
set_like.coe_injective $ image_image g f S
@[simp] lemma map_id (S : convex_cone 𝕜 E) : S.map linear_map.id = S :=
set_like.coe_injective $ image_id _
/-- The preimage of a convex cone under a `𝕜`-linear map is a convex cone. -/
def comap (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) (S : convex_cone 𝕜 F) : convex_cone 𝕜 E :=
{ carrier := f ⁻¹' S,
smul_mem' := λ c hc x hx, by { rw [mem_preimage, f.map_smul c], exact S.smul_mem hc hx },
add_mem' := λ x hx y hy, by { rw [mem_preimage, f.map_add], exact S.add_mem hx hy } }
@[simp] lemma coe_comap (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) (S : convex_cone 𝕜 F) : (S.comap f : set E) = f ⁻¹' S := rfl
@[simp] lemma comap_id (S : convex_cone 𝕜 E) : S.comap linear_map.id = S :=
set_like.coe_injective preimage_id
lemma comap_comap (g : F →ₗ[𝕜] G) (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) (S : convex_cone 𝕜 G) :
(S.comap g).comap f = S.comap (g.comp f) :=
set_like.coe_injective $ preimage_comp.symm
@[simp] lemma mem_comap {f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F} {S : convex_cone 𝕜 F} {x : E} : x ∈ S.comap f ↔ f x ∈ S :=
iff.rfl
end module
end add_comm_monoid
section ordered_add_comm_group
variables [ordered_add_comm_group E] [module 𝕜 E]
/--
Constructs an ordered module given an `ordered_add_comm_group`, a cone, and a proof that
the order relation is the one defined by the cone.
-/
lemma to_ordered_smul (S : convex_cone 𝕜 E) (h : ∀ x y : E, x ≤ y ↔ y - x ∈ S) :
ordered_smul 𝕜 E :=
ordered_smul.mk'
begin
intros x y z xy hz,
rw [h (z • x) (z • y), ←smul_sub z y x],
exact smul_mem S hz ((h x y).mp xy.le),
end
end ordered_add_comm_group
end linear_ordered_field
/-! ### Convex cones with extra properties -/
section ordered_semiring
variables [ordered_semiring 𝕜]
section add_comm_monoid
variables [add_comm_monoid E] [has_smul 𝕜 E] (S : convex_cone 𝕜 E)
/-- A convex cone is pointed if it includes `0`. -/
def pointed (S : convex_cone 𝕜 E) : Prop := (0 : E) ∈ S
/-- A convex cone is blunt if it doesn't include `0`. -/
def blunt (S : convex_cone 𝕜 E) : Prop := (0 : E) ∉ S
lemma pointed_iff_not_blunt (S : convex_cone 𝕜 E) : S.pointed ↔ ¬S.blunt :=
⟨λ h₁ h₂, h₂ h₁, not_not.mp⟩
lemma blunt_iff_not_pointed (S : convex_cone 𝕜 E) : S.blunt ↔ ¬S.pointed :=
by rw [pointed_iff_not_blunt, not_not]
lemma pointed.mono {S T : convex_cone 𝕜 E} (h : S ≤ T) : S.pointed → T.pointed := @h _
lemma blunt.anti {S T : convex_cone 𝕜 E} (h : T ≤ S) : S.blunt → T.blunt := (∘ @@h)
end add_comm_monoid
section add_comm_group
variables [add_comm_group E] [has_smul 𝕜 E] (S : convex_cone 𝕜 E)
/-- A convex cone is flat if it contains some nonzero vector `x` and its opposite `-x`. -/
def flat : Prop := ∃ x ∈ S, x ≠ (0 : E) ∧ -x ∈ S
/-- A convex cone is salient if it doesn't include `x` and `-x` for any nonzero `x`. -/
def salient : Prop := ∀ x ∈ S, x ≠ (0 : E) → -x ∉ S
lemma salient_iff_not_flat (S : convex_cone 𝕜 E) : S.salient ↔ ¬S.flat :=
begin
split,
{ rintros h₁ ⟨x, xs, H₁, H₂⟩,
exact h₁ x xs H₁ H₂ },
{ intro h,
unfold flat at h,
push_neg at h,
exact h }
end
lemma flat.mono {S T : convex_cone 𝕜 E} (h : S ≤ T) : S.flat → T.flat
| ⟨x, hxS, hx, hnxS⟩ := ⟨x, h hxS, hx, h hnxS⟩
lemma salient.anti {S T : convex_cone 𝕜 E} (h : T ≤ S) : S.salient → T.salient :=
λ hS x hxT hx hnT, hS x (h hxT) hx (h hnT)
/-- A flat cone is always pointed (contains `0`). -/
lemma flat.pointed {S : convex_cone 𝕜 E} (hS : S.flat) : S.pointed :=
begin
obtain ⟨x, hx, _, hxneg⟩ := hS,
rw [pointed, ←add_neg_self x],
exact add_mem S hx hxneg,
end
/-- A blunt cone (one not containing `0`) is always salient. -/
lemma blunt.salient {S : convex_cone 𝕜 E} : S.blunt → S.salient :=
begin
rw [salient_iff_not_flat, blunt_iff_not_pointed],
exact mt flat.pointed,
end
/-- A pointed convex cone defines a preorder. -/
def to_preorder (h₁ : S.pointed) : preorder E :=
{ le := λ x y, y - x ∈ S,
le_refl := λ x, by change x - x ∈ S; rw [sub_self x]; exact h₁,
le_trans := λ x y z xy zy, by simpa using add_mem S zy xy }
/-- A pointed and salient cone defines a partial order. -/
def to_partial_order (h₁ : S.pointed) (h₂ : S.salient) : partial_order E :=
{ le_antisymm :=
begin
intros a b ab ba,
by_contradiction h,
have h' : b - a ≠ 0 := λ h'', h (eq_of_sub_eq_zero h'').symm,
have H := h₂ (b-a) ab h',
rw neg_sub b a at H,
exact H ba,
end,
..to_preorder S h₁ }
/-- A pointed and salient cone defines an `ordered_add_comm_group`. -/
def to_ordered_add_comm_group (h₁ : S.pointed) (h₂ : S.salient) :
ordered_add_comm_group E :=
{ add_le_add_left :=
begin
intros a b hab c,
change c + b - (c + a) ∈ S,
rw add_sub_add_left_eq_sub,
exact hab,
end,
..to_partial_order S h₁ h₂,
..show add_comm_group E, by apply_instance }
end add_comm_group
section module
variables [add_comm_monoid E] [module 𝕜 E]
instance : has_zero (convex_cone 𝕜 E) := ⟨⟨0, λ _ _, by simp, λ _, by simp⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma mem_zero (x : E) : x ∈ (0 : convex_cone 𝕜 E) ↔ x = 0 := iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_zero : ((0 : convex_cone 𝕜 E) : set E) = 0 := rfl
lemma pointed_zero : (0 : convex_cone 𝕜 E).pointed := by rw [pointed, mem_zero]
instance : has_add (convex_cone 𝕜 E) := ⟨ λ K₁ K₂,
{ carrier := {z | ∃ (x y : E), x ∈ K₁ ∧ y ∈ K₂ ∧ x + y = z},
smul_mem' :=
begin
rintro c hc _ ⟨x, y, hx, hy, rfl⟩,
rw smul_add,
use [c • x, c • y, K₁.smul_mem hc hx, K₂.smul_mem hc hy],
end,
add_mem' :=
begin
rintro _ ⟨x₁, x₂, hx₁, hx₂, rfl⟩ y ⟨y₁, y₂, hy₁, hy₂, rfl⟩,
use [x₁ + y₁, x₂ + y₂, K₁.add_mem hx₁ hy₁, K₂.add_mem hx₂ hy₂],
abel,
end } ⟩
@[simp] lemma mem_add {K₁ K₂ : convex_cone 𝕜 E} {a : E} :
a ∈ K₁ + K₂ ↔ ∃ (x y : E), x ∈ K₁ ∧ y ∈ K₂ ∧ x + y = a := iff.rfl
instance : add_zero_class (convex_cone 𝕜 E) :=
⟨0, has_add.add, λ _, by {ext, simp}, λ _, by {ext, simp}⟩
instance : add_comm_semigroup (convex_cone 𝕜 E) :=
{ add := has_add.add,
add_assoc := λ _ _ _, set_like.coe_injective $ set.add_comm_semigroup.add_assoc _ _ _,
add_comm := λ _ _, set_like.coe_injective $ set.add_comm_semigroup.add_comm _ _ }
end module
end ordered_semiring
end convex_cone
namespace submodule
/-! ### Submodules are cones -/
section ordered_semiring
variables [ordered_semiring 𝕜]
section add_comm_monoid
variables [add_comm_monoid E] [module 𝕜 E]
/-- Every submodule is trivially a convex cone. -/
def to_convex_cone (S : submodule 𝕜 E) : convex_cone 𝕜 E :=
{ carrier := S,
smul_mem' := λ c hc x hx, S.smul_mem c hx,
add_mem' := λ x hx y hy, S.add_mem hx hy }
@[simp] lemma coe_to_convex_cone (S : submodule 𝕜 E) : ↑S.to_convex_cone = (S : set E) := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_to_convex_cone {x : E} {S : submodule 𝕜 E} : x ∈ S.to_convex_cone ↔ x ∈ S :=
iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma to_convex_cone_le_iff {S T : submodule 𝕜 E} :
S.to_convex_cone ≤ T.to_convex_cone ↔ S ≤ T :=
iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma to_convex_cone_bot : (⊥ : submodule 𝕜 E).to_convex_cone = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_convex_cone_top : (⊤ : submodule 𝕜 E).to_convex_cone = ⊤ := rfl
@[simp] lemma to_convex_cone_inf (S T : submodule 𝕜 E) :
(S ⊓ T).to_convex_cone = S.to_convex_cone ⊓ T.to_convex_cone :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma pointed_to_convex_cone (S : submodule 𝕜 E) : S.to_convex_cone.pointed := S.zero_mem
end add_comm_monoid
end ordered_semiring
end submodule
namespace convex_cone
/-! ### Positive cone of an ordered module -/
section positive_cone
variables (𝕜 E) [ordered_semiring 𝕜] [ordered_add_comm_group E] [module 𝕜 E] [ordered_smul 𝕜 E]
/--
The positive cone is the convex cone formed by the set of nonnegative elements in an ordered
module.
-/
def positive : convex_cone 𝕜 E :=
{ carrier := set.Ici 0,
smul_mem' := λ c hc x (hx : _ ≤ _), smul_nonneg hc.le hx,
add_mem' := λ x (hx : _ ≤ _) y (hy : _ ≤ _), add_nonneg hx hy }
@[simp] lemma mem_positive {x : E} : x ∈ positive 𝕜 E ↔ 0 ≤ x := iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_positive : ↑(positive 𝕜 E) = set.Ici (0 : E) := rfl
/-- The positive cone of an ordered module is always salient. -/
lemma salient_positive : salient (positive 𝕜 E) :=
λ x xs hx hx', lt_irrefl (0 : E)
(calc
0 < x : lt_of_le_of_ne xs hx.symm
... ≤ x + (-x) : le_add_of_nonneg_right hx'
... = 0 : add_neg_self x)
/-- The positive cone of an ordered module is always pointed. -/
lemma pointed_positive : pointed (positive 𝕜 E) := le_refl 0
/-- The cone of strictly positive elements.
Note that this naming diverges from the mathlib convention of `pos` and `nonneg` due to "positive
cone" (`convex_cone.positive`) being established terminology for the non-negative elements. -/
def strictly_positive : convex_cone 𝕜 E :=
{ carrier := set.Ioi 0,
smul_mem' := λ c hc x (hx : _ < _), smul_pos hc hx,
add_mem' := λ x hx y hy, add_pos hx hy }
@[simp] lemma mem_strictly_positive {x : E} : x ∈ strictly_positive 𝕜 E ↔ 0 < x := iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_strictly_positive : ↑(strictly_positive 𝕜 E) = set.Ioi (0 : E) := rfl
lemma positive_le_strictly_positive : strictly_positive 𝕜 E ≤ positive 𝕜 E := λ x, le_of_lt
/-- The strictly positive cone of an ordered module is always salient. -/
lemma salient_strictly_positive : salient (strictly_positive 𝕜 E) :=
(salient_positive 𝕜 E).anti $ positive_le_strictly_positive 𝕜 E
/-- The strictly positive cone of an ordered module is always blunt. -/
lemma blunt_strictly_positive : blunt (strictly_positive 𝕜 E) := lt_irrefl 0
end positive_cone
end convex_cone
/-! ### Cone over a convex set -/
section cone_from_convex
variables [linear_ordered_field 𝕜] [add_comm_group E] [module 𝕜 E]
namespace convex
/-- The set of vectors proportional to those in a convex set forms a convex cone. -/
def to_cone (s : set E) (hs : convex 𝕜 s) : convex_cone 𝕜 E :=
begin
apply convex_cone.mk (⋃ (c : 𝕜) (H : 0 < c), c • s);
simp only [mem_Union, mem_smul_set],
{ rintros c c_pos _ ⟨c', c'_pos, x, hx, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨c * c', mul_pos c_pos c'_pos, x, hx, (smul_smul _ _ _).symm⟩ },
{ rintros _ ⟨cx, cx_pos, x, hx, rfl⟩ _ ⟨cy, cy_pos, y, hy, rfl⟩,
have : 0 < cx + cy, from add_pos cx_pos cy_pos,
refine ⟨_, this, _, convex_iff_div.1 hs hx hy cx_pos.le cy_pos.le this, _⟩,
simp only [smul_add, smul_smul, mul_div_assoc', mul_div_cancel_left _ this.ne'] }
end
variables {s : set E} (hs : convex 𝕜 s) {x : E}
lemma mem_to_cone : x ∈ hs.to_cone s ↔ ∃ (c : 𝕜), 0 < c ∧ ∃ y ∈ s, c • y = x :=
by simp only [to_cone, convex_cone.mem_mk, mem_Union, mem_smul_set, eq_comm, exists_prop]
lemma mem_to_cone' : x ∈ hs.to_cone s ↔ ∃ (c : 𝕜), 0 < c ∧ c • x ∈ s :=
begin
refine hs.mem_to_cone.trans ⟨_, _⟩,
{ rintros ⟨c, hc, y, hy, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨c⁻¹, inv_pos.2 hc, by rwa [smul_smul, inv_mul_cancel hc.ne', one_smul]⟩ },
{ rintros ⟨c, hc, hcx⟩,
exact ⟨c⁻¹, inv_pos.2 hc, _, hcx, by rw [smul_smul, inv_mul_cancel hc.ne', one_smul]⟩ }
end
lemma subset_to_cone : s ⊆ hs.to_cone s :=
λ x hx, hs.mem_to_cone'.2 ⟨1, zero_lt_one, by rwa one_smul⟩
/-- `hs.to_cone s` is the least cone that includes `s`. -/
lemma to_cone_is_least : is_least { t : convex_cone 𝕜 E | s ⊆ t } (hs.to_cone s) :=
begin
refine ⟨hs.subset_to_cone, λ t ht x hx, _⟩,
rcases hs.mem_to_cone.1 hx with ⟨c, hc, y, hy, rfl⟩,
exact t.smul_mem hc (ht hy)
end
lemma to_cone_eq_Inf : hs.to_cone s = Inf { t : convex_cone 𝕜 E | s ⊆ t } :=
hs.to_cone_is_least.is_glb.Inf_eq.symm
end convex
lemma convex_hull_to_cone_is_least (s : set E) :
is_least {t : convex_cone 𝕜 E | s ⊆ t} ((convex_convex_hull 𝕜 s).to_cone _) :=
begin
convert (convex_convex_hull 𝕜 s).to_cone_is_least,
ext t,
exact ⟨λ h, convex_hull_min h t.convex, (subset_convex_hull 𝕜 s).trans⟩,
end
lemma convex_hull_to_cone_eq_Inf (s : set E) :
(convex_convex_hull 𝕜 s).to_cone _ = Inf {t : convex_cone 𝕜 E | s ⊆ t} :=
eq.symm $ is_glb.Inf_eq $ is_least.is_glb $ convex_hull_to_cone_is_least s
end cone_from_convex
/-!
### M. Riesz extension theorem
Given a convex cone `s` in a vector space `E`, a submodule `p`, and a linear `f : p → ℝ`, assume
that `f` is nonnegative on `p ∩ s` and `p + s = E`. Then there exists a globally defined linear
function `g : E → ℝ` that agrees with `f` on `p`, and is nonnegative on `s`.
We prove this theorem using Zorn's lemma. `riesz_extension.step` is the main part of the proof.
It says that if the domain `p` of `f` is not the whole space, then `f` can be extended to a larger
subspace `p ⊔ span ℝ {y}` without breaking the non-negativity condition.
In `riesz_extension.exists_top` we use Zorn's lemma to prove that we can extend `f`
to a linear map `g` on `⊤ : submodule E`. Mathematically this is the same as a linear map on `E`
but in Lean `⊤ : submodule E` is isomorphic but is not equal to `E`. In `riesz_extension`
we use this isomorphism to prove the theorem.
-/
variables [add_comm_group E] [module ℝ E]
namespace riesz_extension
open submodule
variables (s : convex_cone ℝ E) (f : E →ₗ.[ℝ] ℝ)
/-- Induction step in M. Riesz extension theorem. Given a convex cone `s` in a vector space `E`,
a partially defined linear map `f : f.domain → ℝ`, assume that `f` is nonnegative on `f.domain ∩ p`
and `p + s = E`. If `f` is not defined on the whole `E`, then we can extend it to a larger
submodule without breaking the non-negativity condition. -/
lemma step (nonneg : ∀ x : f.domain, (x : E) ∈ s → 0 ≤ f x)
(dense : ∀ y, ∃ x : f.domain, (x : E) + y ∈ s) (hdom : f.domain ≠ ⊤) :
∃ g, f < g ∧ ∀ x : g.domain, (x : E) ∈ s → 0 ≤ g x :=
begin
obtain ⟨y, -, hy⟩ : ∃ (y : E) (h : y ∈ ⊤), y ∉ f.domain,
{ exact @set_like.exists_of_lt (submodule ℝ E) _ _ _ _ (lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 hdom) },
obtain ⟨c, le_c, c_le⟩ :
∃ c, (∀ x : f.domain, -(x:E) - y ∈ s → f x ≤ c) ∧ (∀ x : f.domain, (x:E) + y ∈ s → c ≤ f x),
{ set Sp := f '' {x : f.domain | (x:E) + y ∈ s},
set Sn := f '' {x : f.domain | -(x:E) - y ∈ s},
suffices : (upper_bounds Sn ∩ lower_bounds Sp).nonempty,
by simpa only [set.nonempty, upper_bounds, lower_bounds, ball_image_iff] using this,
refine exists_between_of_forall_le (nonempty.image f _) (nonempty.image f (dense y)) _,
{ rcases (dense (-y)) with ⟨x, hx⟩,
rw [← neg_neg x, add_subgroup_class.coe_neg, ← sub_eq_add_neg] at hx,
exact ⟨_, hx⟩ },
rintros a ⟨xn, hxn, rfl⟩ b ⟨xp, hxp, rfl⟩,
have := s.add_mem hxp hxn,
rw [add_assoc, add_sub_cancel'_right, ← sub_eq_add_neg, ← add_subgroup_class.coe_sub] at this,
replace := nonneg _ this,
rwa [f.map_sub, sub_nonneg] at this },
have hy' : y ≠ 0, from λ hy₀, hy (hy₀.symm ▸ zero_mem _),
refine ⟨f.sup_span_singleton y (-c) hy, _, _⟩,
{ refine lt_iff_le_not_le.2 ⟨f.left_le_sup _ _, λ H, _⟩,
replace H := linear_pmap.domain_mono.monotone H,
rw [linear_pmap.domain_sup_span_singleton, sup_le_iff, span_le, singleton_subset_iff] at H,
exact hy H.2 },
{ rintros ⟨z, hz⟩ hzs,
rcases mem_sup.1 hz with ⟨x, hx, y', hy', rfl⟩,
rcases mem_span_singleton.1 hy' with ⟨r, rfl⟩,
simp only [subtype.coe_mk] at hzs,
erw [linear_pmap.sup_span_singleton_apply_mk _ _ _ _ _ hx, smul_neg,
← sub_eq_add_neg, sub_nonneg],
rcases lt_trichotomy r 0 with hr|hr|hr,
{ have : -(r⁻¹ • x) - y ∈ s,
by rwa [← s.smul_mem_iff (neg_pos.2 hr), smul_sub, smul_neg, neg_smul, neg_neg, smul_smul,
mul_inv_cancel hr.ne, one_smul, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_smul, neg_neg],
replace := le_c (r⁻¹ • ⟨x, hx⟩) this,
rwa [← mul_le_mul_left (neg_pos.2 hr), neg_mul, neg_mul,
neg_le_neg_iff, f.map_smul, smul_eq_mul, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel hr.ne,
one_mul] at this },
{ subst r,
simp only [zero_smul, add_zero] at hzs ⊢,
apply nonneg,
exact hzs },
{ have : r⁻¹ • x + y ∈ s,
by rwa [← s.smul_mem_iff hr, smul_add, smul_smul, mul_inv_cancel hr.ne', one_smul],
replace := c_le (r⁻¹ • ⟨x, hx⟩) this,
rwa [← mul_le_mul_left hr, f.map_smul, smul_eq_mul, ← mul_assoc,
mul_inv_cancel hr.ne', one_mul] at this } }
end
theorem exists_top (p : E →ₗ.[ℝ] ℝ)
(hp_nonneg : ∀ x : p.domain, (x : E) ∈ s → 0 ≤ p x)
(hp_dense : ∀ y, ∃ x : p.domain, (x : E) + y ∈ s) :
∃ q ≥ p, q.domain = ⊤ ∧ ∀ x : q.domain, (x : E) ∈ s → 0 ≤ q x :=
begin
replace hp_nonneg : p ∈ { p | _ }, by { rw mem_set_of_eq, exact hp_nonneg },
obtain ⟨q, hqs, hpq, hq⟩ := zorn_nonempty_partial_order₀ _ _ _ hp_nonneg,
{ refine ⟨q, hpq, _, hqs⟩,
contrapose! hq,
rcases step s q hqs _ hq with ⟨r, hqr, hr⟩,
{ exact ⟨r, hr, hqr.le, hqr.ne'⟩ },
{ exact λ y, let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hp_dense y in ⟨of_le hpq.left x, hx⟩ } },
{ intros c hcs c_chain y hy,
clear hp_nonneg hp_dense p,
have cne : c.nonempty := ⟨y, hy⟩,
refine ⟨linear_pmap.Sup c c_chain.directed_on, _, λ _, linear_pmap.le_Sup c_chain.directed_on⟩,
rintros ⟨x, hx⟩ hxs,
have hdir : directed_on (≤) (linear_pmap.domain '' c),
from directed_on_image.2 (c_chain.directed_on.mono linear_pmap.domain_mono.monotone),
rcases (mem_Sup_of_directed (cne.image _) hdir).1 hx with ⟨_, ⟨f, hfc, rfl⟩, hfx⟩,
have : f ≤ linear_pmap.Sup c c_chain.directed_on, from linear_pmap.le_Sup _ hfc,
convert ← hcs hfc ⟨x, hfx⟩ hxs,
apply this.2, refl }
end
end riesz_extension
/-- M. **Riesz extension theorem**: given a convex cone `s` in a vector space `E`, a submodule `p`,
and a linear `f : p → ℝ`, assume that `f` is nonnegative on `p ∩ s` and `p + s = E`. Then
there exists a globally defined linear function `g : E → ℝ` that agrees with `f` on `p`,
and is nonnegative on `s`. -/
theorem riesz_extension (s : convex_cone ℝ E) (f : E →ₗ.[ℝ] ℝ)
(nonneg : ∀ x : f.domain, (x : E) ∈ s → 0 ≤ f x) (dense : ∀ y, ∃ x : f.domain, (x : E) + y ∈ s) :
∃ g : E →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ, (∀ x : f.domain, g x = f x) ∧ (∀ x ∈ s, 0 ≤ g x) :=
begin
rcases riesz_extension.exists_top s f nonneg dense with ⟨⟨g_dom, g⟩, ⟨hpg, hfg⟩, htop, hgs⟩,
clear hpg,
refine ⟨g ∘ₗ ↑(linear_equiv.of_top _ htop).symm, _, _⟩;
simp only [comp_apply, linear_equiv.coe_coe, linear_equiv.of_top_symm_apply],
{ exact λ x, (hfg (submodule.coe_mk _ _).symm).symm },
{ exact λ x hx, hgs ⟨x, _⟩ hx }
end
/-- **Hahn-Banach theorem**: if `N : E → ℝ` is a sublinear map, `f` is a linear map
defined on a subspace of `E`, and `f x ≤ N x` for all `x` in the domain of `f`,
then `f` can be extended to the whole space to a linear map `g` such that `g x ≤ N x`
for all `x`. -/
theorem exists_extension_of_le_sublinear (f : E →ₗ.[ℝ] ℝ) (N : E → ℝ)
(N_hom : ∀ (c : ℝ), 0 < c → ∀ x, N (c • x) = c * N x)
(N_add : ∀ x y, N (x + y) ≤ N x + N y)
(hf : ∀ x : f.domain, f x ≤ N x) :
∃ g : E →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ, (∀ x : f.domain, g x = f x) ∧ (∀ x, g x ≤ N x) :=
begin
let s : convex_cone ℝ (E × ℝ) :=
{ carrier := {p : E × ℝ | N p.1 ≤ p.2 },
smul_mem' := λ c hc p hp,
calc N (c • p.1) = c * N p.1 : N_hom c hc p.1
... ≤ c * p.2 : mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hp hc.le,
add_mem' := λ x hx y hy, (N_add _ _).trans (add_le_add hx hy) },
obtain ⟨g, g_eq, g_nonneg⟩ :=
riesz_extension s ((-f).coprod (linear_map.id.to_pmap ⊤)) _ _;
try { simp only [linear_pmap.coprod_apply, to_pmap_apply, id_apply,
linear_pmap.neg_apply, ← sub_eq_neg_add, sub_nonneg, subtype.coe_mk] at * },
replace g_eq : ∀ (x : f.domain) (y : ℝ), g (x, y) = y - f x,
{ intros x y,
simpa only [subtype.coe_mk, subtype.coe_eta] using g_eq ⟨(x, y), ⟨x.2, trivial⟩⟩ },
{ refine ⟨-g.comp (inl ℝ E ℝ), _, _⟩; simp only [neg_apply, inl_apply, comp_apply],
{ intro x, simp [g_eq x 0] },
{ intro x,
have A : (x, N x) = (x, 0) + (0, N x), by simp,
have B := g_nonneg ⟨x, N x⟩ (le_refl (N x)),
rw [A, map_add, ← neg_le_iff_add_nonneg'] at B,
have C := g_eq 0 (N x),
simp only [submodule.coe_zero, f.map_zero, sub_zero] at C,
rwa ← C } },
{ exact λ x hx, le_trans (hf _) hx },
{ rintros ⟨x, y⟩,
refine ⟨⟨(0, N x - y), ⟨f.domain.zero_mem, trivial⟩⟩, _⟩,
simp only [convex_cone.mem_mk, mem_set_of_eq, subtype.coe_mk, prod.fst_add, prod.snd_add,
zero_add, sub_add_cancel] }
end
/-! ### The dual cone -/
section dual
variables {H : Type*} [normed_add_comm_group H] [inner_product_space ℝ H] (s t : set H)
open_locale real_inner_product_space
/-- The dual cone is the cone consisting of all points `y` such that for
all points `x` in a given set `0 ≤ ⟪ x, y ⟫`. -/
def set.inner_dual_cone (s : set H) : convex_cone ℝ H :=
{ carrier := { y | ∀ x ∈ s, 0 ≤ ⟪ x, y ⟫ },
smul_mem' := λ c hc y hy x hx,
begin
rw real_inner_smul_right,
exact mul_nonneg hc.le (hy x hx)
end,
add_mem' := λ u hu v hv x hx,
begin
rw inner_add_right,
exact add_nonneg (hu x hx) (hv x hx)
end }
@[simp] lemma mem_inner_dual_cone (y : H) (s : set H) :
y ∈ s.inner_dual_cone ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, 0 ≤ ⟪ x, y ⟫ := iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma inner_dual_cone_empty : (∅ : set H).inner_dual_cone = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.mpr $ λ x hy y, false.elim
/-- Dual cone of the convex cone {0} is the total space. -/
@[simp] lemma inner_dual_cone_zero : (0 : set H).inner_dual_cone = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.mpr $ λ x hy y (hy : y = 0), hy.symm ▸ (inner_zero_left _).ge
/-- Dual cone of the total space is the convex cone {0}. -/
@[simp] lemma inner_dual_cone_univ : (univ : set H).inner_dual_cone = 0 :=
begin
suffices : ∀ x : H, x ∈ (univ : set H).inner_dual_cone → x = 0,
{ apply set_like.coe_injective,
exact eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem.mpr ⟨λ x hx, (inner_zero_right _).ge, this⟩ },
exact λ x hx, by simpa [←real_inner_self_nonpos] using hx (-x) (mem_univ _),
end
lemma inner_dual_cone_le_inner_dual_cone (h : t ⊆ s) :
s.inner_dual_cone ≤ t.inner_dual_cone :=
λ y hy x hx, hy x (h hx)
lemma pointed_inner_dual_cone : s.inner_dual_cone.pointed :=
λ x hx, by rw inner_zero_right
/-- The inner dual cone of a singleton is given by the preimage of the positive cone under the
linear map `λ y, ⟪x, y⟫`. -/
lemma inner_dual_cone_singleton (x : H) :
({x} : set H).inner_dual_cone = (convex_cone.positive ℝ ℝ).comap (innerₛₗ ℝ x) :=
convex_cone.ext $ λ i, forall_eq
lemma inner_dual_cone_union (s t : set H) :
(s ∪ t).inner_dual_cone = s.inner_dual_cone ⊓ t.inner_dual_cone :=
le_antisymm
(le_inf (λ x hx y hy, hx _ $ or.inl hy) (λ x hx y hy, hx _ $ or.inr hy))
(λ x hx y, or.rec (hx.1 _) (hx.2 _))
lemma inner_dual_cone_insert (x : H) (s : set H) :
(insert x s).inner_dual_cone = set.inner_dual_cone {x} ⊓ s.inner_dual_cone :=
by rw [insert_eq, inner_dual_cone_union]
lemma inner_dual_cone_Union {ι : Sort*} (f : ι → set H) :
(⋃ i, f i).inner_dual_cone = ⨅ i, (f i).inner_dual_cone :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (le_infi $ λ i x hx y hy, hx _ $ mem_Union_of_mem _ hy) _,
intros x hx y hy,
rw [convex_cone.mem_infi] at hx,
obtain ⟨j, hj⟩ := mem_Union.mp hy,
exact hx _ _ hj,
end
lemma inner_dual_cone_sUnion (S : set (set H)) :
(⋃₀ S).inner_dual_cone = Inf (set.inner_dual_cone '' S) :=
by simp_rw [Inf_image, sUnion_eq_bUnion, inner_dual_cone_Union]
/-- The dual cone of `s` equals the intersection of dual cones of the points in `s`. -/
lemma inner_dual_cone_eq_Inter_inner_dual_cone_singleton :
(s.inner_dual_cone : set H) = ⋂ i : s, (({i} : set H).inner_dual_cone : set H) :=
by rw [←convex_cone.coe_infi, ←inner_dual_cone_Union, Union_of_singleton_coe]
lemma is_closed_inner_dual_cone : is_closed (s.inner_dual_cone : set H) :=
begin
-- reduce the problem to showing that dual cone of a singleton `{x}` is closed
rw inner_dual_cone_eq_Inter_inner_dual_cone_singleton,
apply is_closed_Inter,
intros x,
-- the dual cone of a singleton `{x}` is the preimage of `[0, ∞)` under `inner x`
have h : ↑({x} : set H).inner_dual_cone = (inner x : H → ℝ) ⁻¹' set.Ici 0,
{ rw [inner_dual_cone_singleton, convex_cone.coe_comap, convex_cone.coe_positive,
innerₛₗ_apply_coe] },
-- the preimage is closed as `inner x` is continuous and `[0, ∞)` is closed
rw h,
exact is_closed_Ici.preimage (by continuity),
end
lemma convex_cone.pointed_of_nonempty_of_is_closed (K : convex_cone ℝ H)
(ne : (K : set H).nonempty) (hc : is_closed (K : set H)) : K.pointed :=
begin
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := ne,
let f : ℝ → H := (• x),
-- f (0, ∞) is a subset of K
have fI : f '' set.Ioi 0 ⊆ (K : set H),
{ rintro _ ⟨_, h, rfl⟩,
exact K.smul_mem (set.mem_Ioi.1 h) hx },
-- closure of f (0, ∞) is a subset of K
have clf : closure (f '' set.Ioi 0) ⊆ (K : set H) := hc.closure_subset_iff.2 fI,
-- f is continuous at 0 from the right
have fc : continuous_within_at f (set.Ioi (0 : ℝ)) 0 :=
(continuous_id.smul continuous_const).continuous_within_at,
-- 0 belongs to the closure of the f (0, ∞)
have mem₀ := fc.mem_closure_image (by rw [closure_Ioi (0 : ℝ), mem_Ici]),
-- as 0 ∈ closure f (0, ∞) and closure f (0, ∞) ⊆ K, 0 ∈ K.
have f₀ : f 0 = 0 := zero_smul ℝ x,
simpa only [f₀, convex_cone.pointed, ← set_like.mem_coe] using mem_of_subset_of_mem clf mem₀,
end
section complete_space
variables [complete_space H]
/-- This is a stronger version of the Hahn-Banach separation theorem for closed convex cones. This
is also the geometric interpretation of Farkas' lemma. -/
theorem convex_cone.hyperplane_separation_of_nonempty_of_is_closed_of_nmem (K : convex_cone ℝ H)
(ne : (K : set H).nonempty) (hc : is_closed (K : set H)) {b : H} (disj : b ∉ K) :
∃ (y : H), (∀ x : H, x ∈ K → 0 ≤ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ) ∧ ⟪y, b⟫_ℝ < 0 :=
begin
-- let `z` be the point in `K` closest to `b`
obtain ⟨z, hzK, infi⟩ := exists_norm_eq_infi_of_complete_convex ne hc.is_complete K.convex b,
-- for any `w` in `K`, we have `⟪b - z, w - z⟫_ℝ ≤ 0`
have hinner := (norm_eq_infi_iff_real_inner_le_zero K.convex hzK).1 infi,
-- set `y := z - b`
use z - b,
split,
{ -- the rest of the proof is a straightforward calculation
rintros x hxK,
specialize hinner _ (K.add_mem hxK hzK),
rwa [add_sub_cancel, real_inner_comm, ← neg_nonneg, neg_eq_neg_one_mul,
← real_inner_smul_right, neg_smul, one_smul, neg_sub] at hinner },
{ -- as `K` is closed and non-empty, it is pointed
have hinner₀ := hinner 0 (K.pointed_of_nonempty_of_is_closed ne hc),
-- the rest of the proof is a straightforward calculation
rw [zero_sub, inner_neg_right, right.neg_nonpos_iff] at hinner₀,
have hbz : b - z ≠ 0 := by { rw sub_ne_zero, contrapose! hzK, rwa ← hzK },
rw [← neg_zero, lt_neg, ← neg_one_mul, ← real_inner_smul_left, smul_sub, neg_smul, one_smul,
neg_smul, neg_sub_neg, one_smul],
calc 0 < ⟪b - z, b - z⟫_ℝ : lt_of_not_le ((iff.not real_inner_self_nonpos).2 hbz)
... = ⟪b - z, b - z⟫_ℝ + 0 : (add_zero _).symm
... ≤ ⟪b - z, b - z⟫_ℝ + ⟪b - z, z⟫_ℝ : add_le_add rfl.ge hinner₀
... = ⟪b - z, b - z + z⟫_ℝ : (inner_add_right _ _ _).symm
... = ⟪b - z, b⟫_ℝ : by rw sub_add_cancel },
end
/-- The inner dual of inner dual of a non-empty, closed convex cone is itself. -/
theorem convex_cone.inner_dual_cone_of_inner_dual_cone_eq_self (K : convex_cone ℝ H)
(ne : (K : set H).nonempty) (hc : is_closed (K : set H)) :
((K : set H).inner_dual_cone : set H).inner_dual_cone = K :=
begin
ext x,
split,
{ rw [mem_inner_dual_cone, ← set_like.mem_coe],
contrapose!,
exact K.hyperplane_separation_of_nonempty_of_is_closed_of_nmem ne hc },
{ rintro hxK y h,
specialize h x hxK,
rwa real_inner_comm },
end
end complete_space
end dual
|
550c23e4ccdf65b8b15c110da1aae2443fc3a73d | 82e44445c70db0f03e30d7be725775f122d72f3e | /src/measure_theory/vector_measure.lean | 67e83d71f5a9b14a02460959a665190044fce94f | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | stjordanis/mathlib | 51e286d19140e3788ef2c470bc7b953e4991f0c9 | 2568d41bca08f5d6bf39d915434c8447e21f42ee | refs/heads/master | 1,631,748,053,501 | 1,627,938,886,000 | 1,627,938,886,000 | 228,728,358 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,576,630,588,000 | 1,576,630,587,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 22,611 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import measure_theory.integration
/-!
# Vector valued measures
This file defines vector valued measures, which are σ-additive functions from a set to a add monoid
`M` such that it maps the empty set and non-measurable sets to zero. In the case
that `M = ℝ`, we called the vector measure a signed measure and write `signed_measure α`.
Similarly, when `M = ℂ`, we call the measure a complex measure and write `complex_measure α`.
## Main definitions
* `vector_measure` is a vector valued, σ-additive function that maps the empty
and non-measurable set to zero.
## Implementation notes
We require all non-measurable sets to be mapped to zero in order for the extensionality lemma
to only compare the underlying functions for measurable sets.
We use `has_sum` instead of `tsum` in the definition of vector measures in comparison to `measure`
since this provides summablity.
## Tags
vector measure, signed measure, complex measure
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical big_operators nnreal ennreal
namespace measure_theory
variables {α β : Type*} [measurable_space α]
/-- A vector measure on a measurable space `α` is a σ-additive `M`-valued function (for some `M`
an add monoid) such that the empty set and non-measurable sets are mapped to zero. -/
structure vector_measure (α : Type*) [measurable_space α]
(M : Type*) [add_comm_monoid M] [topological_space M] :=
(measure_of' : set α → M)
(empty' : measure_of' ∅ = 0)
(not_measurable' ⦃i : set α⦄ : ¬ measurable_set i → measure_of' i = 0)
(m_Union' ⦃f : ℕ → set α⦄ :
(∀ i, measurable_set (f i)) → pairwise (disjoint on f) →
has_sum (λ i, measure_of' (f i)) (measure_of' (⋃ i, f i)))
/-- A `signed_measure` is a `ℝ`-vector measure. -/
abbreviation signed_measure (α : Type*) [measurable_space α] := vector_measure α ℝ
/-- A `complex_measure` is a `ℂ`-vector_measure. -/
abbreviation complex_measure (α : Type*) [measurable_space α] := vector_measure α ℂ
open set measure_theory
namespace vector_measure
section
variables {M : Type*} [add_comm_monoid M] [topological_space M]
instance : has_coe_to_fun (vector_measure α M) :=
⟨λ _, set α → M, vector_measure.measure_of'⟩
initialize_simps_projections vector_measure (measure_of' → apply)
@[simp]
lemma measure_of_eq_coe (v : vector_measure α M) : v.measure_of' = v := rfl
@[simp]
lemma empty (v : vector_measure α M) : v ∅ = 0 := v.empty'
lemma not_measurable (v : vector_measure α M)
{i : set α} (hi : ¬ measurable_set i) : v i = 0 := v.not_measurable' hi
lemma m_Union (v : vector_measure α M) {f : ℕ → set α}
(hf₁ : ∀ i, measurable_set (f i)) (hf₂ : pairwise (disjoint on f)) :
has_sum (λ i, v (f i)) (v (⋃ i, f i)) :=
v.m_Union' hf₁ hf₂
lemma of_disjoint_Union_nat [t2_space M] (v : vector_measure α M) {f : ℕ → set α}
(hf₁ : ∀ i, measurable_set (f i)) (hf₂ : pairwise (disjoint on f)) :
v (⋃ i, f i) = ∑' i, v (f i) :=
(v.m_Union hf₁ hf₂).tsum_eq.symm
lemma coe_injective : @function.injective (vector_measure α M) (set α → M) coe_fn :=
λ v w h, by { cases v, cases w, congr' }
lemma ext_iff' (v w : vector_measure α M) :
v = w ↔ ∀ i : set α, v i = w i :=
by rw [← coe_injective.eq_iff, function.funext_iff]
lemma ext_iff (v w : vector_measure α M) :
v = w ↔ ∀ i : set α, measurable_set i → v i = w i :=
begin
split,
{ rintro rfl _ _, refl },
{ rw ext_iff',
intros h i,
by_cases hi : measurable_set i,
{ exact h i hi },
{ simp_rw [not_measurable _ hi] } }
end
@[ext] lemma ext {s t : vector_measure α M}
(h : ∀ i : set α, measurable_set i → s i = t i) : s = t :=
(ext_iff s t).2 h
variables [t2_space M] {v : vector_measure α M} {f : ℕ → set α}
lemma has_sum_of_disjoint_Union [encodable β] {f : β → set α}
(hf₁ : ∀ i, measurable_set (f i)) (hf₂ : pairwise (disjoint on f)) :
has_sum (λ i, v (f i)) (v (⋃ i, f i)) :=
begin
set g := λ i : ℕ, ⋃ (b : β) (H : b ∈ encodable.decode₂ β i), f b with hg,
have hg₁ : ∀ i, measurable_set (g i),
{ exact λ _, measurable_set.Union (λ b, measurable_set.Union_Prop $ λ _, hf₁ b) },
have hg₂ : pairwise (disjoint on g),
{ exact encodable.Union_decode₂_disjoint_on hf₂ },
have := v.of_disjoint_Union_nat hg₁ hg₂,
rw [hg, encodable.Union_decode₂] at this,
have hg₃ : (λ (i : β), v (f i)) = (λ i, v (g (encodable.encode i))),
{ ext, rw hg, simp only,
congr, ext y, simp only [exists_prop, mem_Union, option.mem_def],
split,
{ intro hy,
refine ⟨x, (encodable.decode₂_is_partial_inv _ _).2 rfl, hy⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩,
rw (encodable.decode₂_is_partial_inv _ _) at hb₁,
rwa ← encodable.encode_injective hb₁ } },
rw [summable.has_sum_iff, this, ← tsum_Union_decode₂],
{ exact v.empty },
{ rw hg₃, change summable ((λ i, v (g i)) ∘ encodable.encode),
rw function.injective.summable_iff encodable.encode_injective,
{ exact (v.m_Union hg₁ hg₂).summable },
{ intros x hx,
convert v.empty,
simp only [Union_eq_empty, option.mem_def, not_exists, mem_range] at ⊢ hx,
intros i hi,
exact false.elim ((hx i) ((encodable.decode₂_is_partial_inv _ _).1 hi)) } }
end
lemma of_disjoint_Union [encodable β] {f : β → set α}
(hf₁ : ∀ i, measurable_set (f i)) (hf₂ : pairwise (disjoint on f)) :
v (⋃ i, f i) = ∑' i, v (f i) :=
(has_sum_of_disjoint_Union hf₁ hf₂).tsum_eq.symm
lemma of_union {A B : set α}
(h : disjoint A B) (hA : measurable_set A) (hB : measurable_set B) :
v (A ∪ B) = v A + v B :=
begin
rw [union_eq_Union, of_disjoint_Union, tsum_fintype, fintype.sum_bool, cond, cond],
exacts [λ b, bool.cases_on b hB hA, pairwise_disjoint_on_bool.2 h]
end
lemma of_add_of_diff {A B : set α} (hA : measurable_set A) (hB : measurable_set B)
(h : A ⊆ B) : v A + v (B \ A) = v B :=
begin
rw [← of_union disjoint_diff hA (hB.diff hA), union_diff_cancel h],
apply_instance,
end
lemma of_diff {M : Type*} [add_comm_group M]
[topological_space M] [t2_space M] {v : vector_measure α M}
{A B : set α} (hA : measurable_set A) (hB : measurable_set B)
(h : A ⊆ B) : v (B \ A) = v B - (v A) :=
begin
rw [← of_add_of_diff hA hB h, add_sub_cancel'],
apply_instance,
end
lemma of_Union_nonneg {M : Type*} [topological_space M]
[ordered_add_comm_monoid M] [order_closed_topology M]
{v : vector_measure α M} (hf₁ : ∀ i, measurable_set (f i))
(hf₂ : pairwise (disjoint on f)) (hf₃ : ∀ i, 0 ≤ v (f i)) :
0 ≤ v (⋃ i, f i) :=
(v.of_disjoint_Union_nat hf₁ hf₂).symm ▸ tsum_nonneg hf₃
lemma of_Union_nonpos {M : Type*} [topological_space M]
[ordered_add_comm_monoid M] [order_closed_topology M]
{v : vector_measure α M} (hf₁ : ∀ i, measurable_set (f i))
(hf₂ : pairwise (disjoint on f)) (hf₃ : ∀ i, v (f i) ≤ 0) :
v (⋃ i, f i) ≤ 0 :=
(v.of_disjoint_Union_nat hf₁ hf₂).symm ▸ tsum_nonpos hf₃
lemma of_nonneg_disjoint_union_eq_zero {s : signed_measure α} {A B : set α}
(h : disjoint A B) (hA₁ : measurable_set A) (hB₁ : measurable_set B)
(hA₂ : 0 ≤ s A) (hB₂ : 0 ≤ s B)
(hAB : s (A ∪ B) = 0) : s A = 0 :=
begin
rw of_union h hA₁ hB₁ at hAB,
linarith,
apply_instance,
end
lemma of_nonpos_disjoint_union_eq_zero {s : signed_measure α} {A B : set α}
(h : disjoint A B) (hA₁ : measurable_set A) (hB₁ : measurable_set B)
(hA₂ : s A ≤ 0) (hB₂ : s B ≤ 0)
(hAB : s (A ∪ B) = 0) : s A = 0 :=
begin
rw of_union h hA₁ hB₁ at hAB,
linarith,
apply_instance,
end
end
section add_comm_monoid
variables {M : Type*} [add_comm_monoid M] [topological_space M]
instance : has_zero (vector_measure α M) :=
⟨⟨0, rfl, λ _ _, rfl, λ _ _ _, has_sum_zero⟩⟩
instance : inhabited (vector_measure α M) := ⟨0⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_zero : ⇑(0 : vector_measure α M) = 0 := rfl
lemma zero_apply (i : set α) : (0 : vector_measure α M) i = 0 := rfl
variables [has_continuous_add M]
/-- The sum of two vector measure is a vector measure. -/
def add (v w : vector_measure α M) : vector_measure α M :=
{ measure_of' := v + w,
empty' := by simp,
not_measurable' := λ _ hi,
by simp [v.not_measurable hi, w.not_measurable hi],
m_Union' := λ f hf₁ hf₂,
has_sum.add (v.m_Union hf₁ hf₂) (w.m_Union hf₁ hf₂) }
instance : has_add (vector_measure α M) := ⟨add⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_add (v w : vector_measure α M) : ⇑(v + w) = v + w := rfl
lemma add_apply (v w : vector_measure α M) (i : set α) :(v + w) i = v i + w i := rfl
instance : add_comm_monoid (vector_measure α M) :=
function.injective.add_comm_monoid _ coe_injective coe_zero coe_add
/-- `coe_fn` is an `add_monoid_hom`. -/
@[simps]
def coe_fn_add_monoid_hom : vector_measure α M →+ (set α → M) :=
{ to_fun := coe_fn, map_zero' := coe_zero, map_add' := coe_add }
end add_comm_monoid
section add_comm_group
variables {M : Type*} [add_comm_group M] [topological_space M]
variables [topological_add_group M]
/-- The negative of a vector measure is a vector measure. -/
def neg (v : vector_measure α M) : vector_measure α M :=
{ measure_of' := -v,
empty' := by simp,
not_measurable' := λ _ hi, by simp [v.not_measurable hi],
m_Union' := λ f hf₁ hf₂, has_sum.neg $ v.m_Union hf₁ hf₂ }
instance : has_neg (vector_measure α M) := ⟨neg⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_neg (v : vector_measure α M) : ⇑(-v) = - v := rfl
lemma neg_apply (v : vector_measure α M) (i : set α) :(-v) i = - v i := rfl
/-- The difference of two vector measure is a vector measure. -/
def sub (v w : vector_measure α M) : vector_measure α M :=
{ measure_of' := v - w,
empty' := by simp,
not_measurable' := λ _ hi,
by simp [v.not_measurable hi, w.not_measurable hi],
m_Union' := λ f hf₁ hf₂,
has_sum.sub (v.m_Union hf₁ hf₂)
(w.m_Union hf₁ hf₂) }
instance : has_sub (vector_measure α M) := ⟨sub⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_sub (v w : vector_measure α M) : ⇑(v - w) = v - w := rfl
lemma sub_apply (v w : vector_measure α M) (i : set α) : (v - w) i = v i - w i := rfl
instance : add_comm_group (vector_measure α M) :=
function.injective.add_comm_group _ coe_injective coe_zero coe_add coe_neg coe_sub
end add_comm_group
section distrib_mul_action
variables {M : Type*} [add_comm_monoid M] [topological_space M]
variables {R : Type*} [semiring R] [distrib_mul_action R M]
variables [topological_space R] [has_continuous_smul R M]
/-- Given a real number `r` and a signed measure `s`, `smul r s` is the signed
measure corresponding to the function `r • s`. -/
def smul (r : R) (v : vector_measure α M) : vector_measure α M :=
{ measure_of' := r • v,
empty' := by rw [pi.smul_apply, empty, smul_zero],
not_measurable' := λ _ hi, by rw [pi.smul_apply, v.not_measurable hi, smul_zero],
m_Union' := λ _ hf₁ hf₂, has_sum.smul (v.m_Union hf₁ hf₂) }
instance : has_scalar R (vector_measure α M) := ⟨smul⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_smul (r : R) (v : vector_measure α M) : ⇑(r • v) = r • v := rfl
lemma smul_apply (r : R) (v : vector_measure α M) (i : set α) :
(r • v) i = r • v i := rfl
instance [has_continuous_add M] : distrib_mul_action R (vector_measure α M) :=
function.injective.distrib_mul_action coe_fn_add_monoid_hom coe_injective coe_smul
end distrib_mul_action
section module
variables {M : Type*} [add_comm_monoid M] [topological_space M]
variables {R : Type*} [semiring R] [module R M]
variables [topological_space R] [has_continuous_smul R M]
instance [has_continuous_add M] : module R (vector_measure α M) :=
function.injective.module R coe_fn_add_monoid_hom coe_injective coe_smul
end module
end vector_measure
namespace measure
/-- A finite measure coerced into a real function is a signed measure. -/
@[simps]
def to_signed_measure (μ : measure α) [hμ : finite_measure μ] : signed_measure α :=
{ measure_of' := λ i : set α, if measurable_set i then (μ.measure_of i).to_real else 0,
empty' := by simp [μ.empty],
not_measurable' := λ _ hi, if_neg hi,
m_Union' :=
begin
intros _ hf₁ hf₂,
rw [μ.m_Union hf₁ hf₂, ennreal.tsum_to_real_eq, if_pos (measurable_set.Union hf₁),
summable.has_sum_iff],
{ congr, ext n, rw if_pos (hf₁ n) },
{ refine @summable_of_nonneg_of_le _ (ennreal.to_real ∘ μ ∘ f) _ _ _ _,
{ intro, split_ifs,
exacts [ennreal.to_real_nonneg, le_refl _] },
{ intro, split_ifs,
exacts [le_refl _, ennreal.to_real_nonneg] },
exact summable_measure_to_real hf₁ hf₂ },
{ intros a ha,
apply ne_of_lt hμ.measure_univ_lt_top,
rw [eq_top_iff, ← ha, outer_measure.measure_of_eq_coe, coe_to_outer_measure],
exact measure_mono (set.subset_univ _) }
end }
lemma to_signed_measure_apply_measurable {μ : measure α} [finite_measure μ]
{i : set α} (hi : measurable_set i) :
μ.to_signed_measure i = (μ i).to_real :=
if_pos hi
@[simp] lemma to_signed_measure_zero :
(0 : measure α).to_signed_measure = 0 :=
by { ext i hi, simp }
@[simp] lemma to_signed_measure_add (μ ν : measure α) [finite_measure μ] [finite_measure ν] :
(μ + ν).to_signed_measure = μ.to_signed_measure + ν.to_signed_measure :=
begin
ext i hi,
rw [to_signed_measure_apply_measurable hi, add_apply,
ennreal.to_real_add (ne_of_lt (measure_lt_top _ _ )) (ne_of_lt (measure_lt_top _ _)),
vector_measure.add_apply, to_signed_measure_apply_measurable hi,
to_signed_measure_apply_measurable hi],
all_goals { apply_instance }
end
@[simp] lemma to_signed_measure_smul (μ : measure α) [finite_measure μ] (r : ℝ≥0) :
(r • μ).to_signed_measure = r • μ.to_signed_measure :=
begin
ext i hi,
rw [to_signed_measure_apply_measurable hi, vector_measure.smul_apply,
to_signed_measure_apply_measurable hi, coe_nnreal_smul, pi.smul_apply,
ennreal.to_real_smul],
end
/-- A measure is a vector measure over `ℝ≥0∞`. -/
@[simps]
def to_ennreal_vector_measure (μ : measure α) : vector_measure α ℝ≥0∞ :=
{ measure_of' := λ i : set α, if measurable_set i then μ i else 0,
empty' := by simp [μ.empty],
not_measurable' := λ _ hi, if_neg hi,
m_Union' := λ _ hf₁ hf₂,
begin
rw summable.has_sum_iff ennreal.summable,
{ rw [if_pos (measurable_set.Union hf₁), measure_theory.measure_Union hf₂ hf₁],
exact tsum_congr (λ n, if_pos (hf₁ n)) },
end }
lemma to_ennreal_vector_measure_apply_measurable
{μ : measure α} {i : set α} (hi : measurable_set i) :
μ.to_ennreal_vector_measure i = μ i :=
if_pos hi
@[simp] lemma to_ennreal_vector_measure_zero :
(0 : measure α).to_ennreal_vector_measure = 0 :=
by { ext i hi, simp }
@[simp] lemma to_ennreal_vector_measure_add (μ ν : measure α) :
(μ + ν).to_ennreal_vector_measure = μ.to_ennreal_vector_measure + ν.to_ennreal_vector_measure :=
begin
refine measure_theory.vector_measure.ext (λ i hi, _),
rw [to_ennreal_vector_measure_apply_measurable hi, add_apply, vector_measure.add_apply,
to_ennreal_vector_measure_apply_measurable hi, to_ennreal_vector_measure_apply_measurable hi]
end
/-- Given two finite measures `μ, ν`, `sub_to_signed_measure μ ν` is the signed measure
corresponding to the function `μ - ν`. -/
def sub_to_signed_measure (μ ν : measure α) [hμ : finite_measure μ] [hν : finite_measure ν] :
signed_measure α :=
μ.to_signed_measure - ν.to_signed_measure
lemma sub_to_signed_measure_apply {μ ν : measure α} [finite_measure μ] [finite_measure ν]
{i : set α} (hi : measurable_set i) :
μ.sub_to_signed_measure ν i = (μ i).to_real - (ν i).to_real :=
begin
rw [sub_to_signed_measure, vector_measure.sub_apply, to_signed_measure_apply_measurable hi,
measure.to_signed_measure_apply_measurable hi, sub_eq_add_neg]
end
end measure
namespace vector_measure
variables [measurable_space β]
section
variables {M : Type*} [add_comm_monoid M] [topological_space M]
variables {v : vector_measure α M}
/-- The pushforward of a vector measure along a function. -/
def map (v : vector_measure α M) (f : α → β) :
vector_measure β M :=
if hf : measurable f then
{ measure_of' := λ s, if measurable_set s then v (f ⁻¹' s) else 0,
empty' := by simp,
not_measurable' := λ i hi, if_neg hi,
m_Union' :=
begin
intros g hg₁ hg₂,
convert v.m_Union (λ i, hf (hg₁ i)) (λ i j hij x hx, hg₂ i j hij hx),
{ ext i, rw if_pos (hg₁ i) },
{ rw [preimage_Union, if_pos (measurable_set.Union hg₁)] }
end } else 0
lemma map_apply {f : α → β} (hf : measurable f) {s : set β} (hs : measurable_set s) :
v.map f s = v (f ⁻¹' s) :=
by { rw [map, dif_pos hf], exact if_pos hs }
@[simp] lemma map_id : v.map id = v :=
ext (λ i hi, by rw [map_apply measurable_id hi, preimage_id])
@[simp] lemma map_zero (f : α → β) : (0 : vector_measure α M).map f = 0 :=
begin
by_cases hf : measurable f,
{ ext i hi,
rw [map_apply hf hi, zero_apply, zero_apply] },
{ exact dif_neg hf }
end
/-- The restriction of a vector measure on some set. -/
def restrict (v : vector_measure α M) (i : set α) :
vector_measure α M :=
if hi : measurable_set i then
{ measure_of' := λ s, if measurable_set s then v (s ∩ i) else 0,
empty' := by simp,
not_measurable' := λ i hi, if_neg hi,
m_Union' :=
begin
intros f hf₁ hf₂,
convert v.m_Union (λ n, (hf₁ n).inter hi)
(hf₂.mono $ λ i j, disjoint.mono inf_le_left inf_le_left),
{ ext n, rw if_pos (hf₁ n) },
{ rw [Union_inter, if_pos (measurable_set.Union hf₁)] }
end } else 0
lemma restrict_apply {i : set α} (hi : measurable_set i)
{j : set α} (hj : measurable_set j) : v.restrict i j = v (j ∩ i) :=
by { rw [restrict, dif_pos hi], exact if_pos hj }
lemma restrict_eq_self {i : set α} (hi : measurable_set i)
{j : set α} (hj : measurable_set j) (hij : j ⊆ i) : v.restrict i j = v j :=
by rw [restrict_apply hi hj, inter_eq_left_iff_subset.2 hij]
@[simp] lemma restrict_empty : v.restrict ∅ = 0 :=
ext (λ i hi, by rw [restrict_apply measurable_set.empty hi, inter_empty, v.empty, zero_apply])
@[simp] lemma restrict_univ : v.restrict univ = v :=
ext (λ i hi, by rw [restrict_apply measurable_set.univ hi, inter_univ])
@[simp] lemma restrict_zero {i : set α} :
(0 : vector_measure α M).restrict i = 0 :=
begin
by_cases hi : measurable_set i,
{ ext j hj, rw [restrict_apply hi hj], refl },
{ exact dif_neg hi }
end
section has_continuous_add
variables [has_continuous_add M]
lemma map_add (v w : vector_measure α M) (f : α → β) :
(v + w).map f = v.map f + w.map f :=
begin
by_cases hf : measurable f,
{ ext i hi,
simp [map_apply hf hi] },
{ simp [map, dif_neg hf] }
end
/-- `vector_measure.map` as an additive monoid homomorphism. -/
@[simps] def map_gm (f : α → β) : vector_measure α M →+ vector_measure β M :=
{ to_fun := λ v, v.map f,
map_zero' := map_zero f,
map_add' := λ _ _, map_add _ _ f }
lemma restrict_add (v w : vector_measure α M) (i : set α) :
(v + w).restrict i = v.restrict i + w.restrict i :=
begin
by_cases hi : measurable_set i,
{ ext j hj,
simp [restrict_apply hi hj] },
{ simp [restrict, dif_neg hi] }
end
/--`vector_measure.restrict` as an additive monoid homomorphism. -/
@[simps] def restrict_gm (i : set α) : vector_measure α M →+ vector_measure α M :=
{ to_fun := λ v, v.restrict i,
map_zero' := restrict_zero,
map_add' := λ _ _, restrict_add _ _ i }
end has_continuous_add
end
section
variables {M : Type*} [add_comm_monoid M] [topological_space M]
variables {R : Type*} [semiring R] [distrib_mul_action R M]
variables [topological_space R] [has_continuous_smul R M]
@[simp] lemma map_smul {v : vector_measure α M} {f : α → β} (c : R) :
(c • v).map f = c • v.map f :=
begin
by_cases hf : measurable f,
{ ext i hi,
simp [map_apply hf hi] },
{ simp only [map, dif_neg hf],
-- `smul_zero` does not work since we do not require `has_continuous_add`
ext i hi, simp }
end
@[simp] lemma restrict_smul {v :vector_measure α M} {i : set α} (c : R) :
(c • v).restrict i = c • v.restrict i :=
begin
by_cases hi : measurable_set i,
{ ext j hj,
simp [restrict_apply hi hj] },
{ simp only [restrict, dif_neg hi],
-- `smul_zero` does not work since we do not require `has_continuous_add`
ext j hj, simp }
end
end
section
variables {M : Type*} [add_comm_monoid M] [topological_space M]
variables {R : Type*} [semiring R] [module R M]
variables [topological_space R] [has_continuous_smul R M] [has_continuous_add M]
/-- `vector_measure.map` as a linear map. -/
@[simps] def mapₗ (f : α → β) : vector_measure α M →ₗ[R] vector_measure β M :=
{ to_fun := λ v, v.map f,
map_add' := λ _ _, map_add _ _ f,
map_smul' := λ _ _, map_smul _ }
/-- `vector_measure.restrict` as an additive monoid homomorphism. -/
@[simps] def restrictₗ (i : set α) : vector_measure α M →ₗ[R] vector_measure α M :=
{ to_fun := λ v, v.restrict i,
map_add' := λ _ _, restrict_add _ _ i,
map_smul' := λ _ _, restrict_smul _ }
end
section
variables {M : Type*} [topological_space M] [add_comm_monoid M] [partial_order M]
/-- Vector measures over a partially ordered monoid is partially ordered.
This definition is consistent with `measure.partial_order`. -/
instance : partial_order (vector_measure α M) :=
{ le := λ v w, ∀ i, measurable_set i → v i ≤ w i,
le_refl := λ v i hi, le_refl _,
le_trans := λ u v w h₁ h₂ i hi, le_trans (h₁ i hi) (h₂ i hi),
le_antisymm := λ v w h₁ h₂, ext (λ i hi, le_antisymm (h₁ i hi) (h₂ i hi)) }
variables {u v w : vector_measure α M}
lemma le_iff : v ≤ w ↔ ∀ i, measurable_set i → v i ≤ w i :=
iff.rfl
lemma le_iff' : v ≤ w ↔ ∀ i, v i ≤ w i :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h i, _, λ h i hi, h i⟩,
by_cases hi : measurable_set i,
{ exact h i hi },
{ rw [v.not_measurable hi, w.not_measurable hi] }
end
end
section
variables {M : Type*} [topological_space M] [add_comm_monoid M] [partial_order M]
[covariant_class M M (+) (≤)] [has_continuous_add M]
instance covariant_add_le :
covariant_class (vector_measure α M) (vector_measure α M) (+) (≤) :=
⟨λ u v w h i hi, add_le_add_left (h i hi) _⟩
end
end vector_measure
end measure_theory
|
074723260b81b659ff75edd04a429fde5bee129e | acc85b4be2c618b11fc7cb3005521ae6858a8d07 | /data/set/disjointed.lean | 6d68970672bb2e878f8e89ebfc768abb070e90e4 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | linpingchuan/mathlib | d49990b236574df2a45d9919ba43c923f693d341 | 5ad8020f67eb13896a41cc7691d072c9331b1f76 | refs/heads/master | 1,626,019,377,808 | 1,508,048,784,000 | 1,508,048,784,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,733 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
Disjointed sets
-/
import data.set.lattice data.nat.basic
open set classical lattice
local attribute [instance] decidable_inhabited prop_decidable
universes u v w x
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {ι : Sort x}
{s t u : set α}
def pairwise {α : Type*} (p : α → α → Prop) := ∀i j, i ≠ j → p i j
namespace set
def disjointed (f : ℕ → set α) (n : ℕ) : set α := f n ∩ (⋂i<n, - f i)
lemma disjoint_disjointed {f : ℕ → set α} : pairwise (disjoint on disjointed f) :=
assume i j h,
have ∀i j, i < j → disjointed f i ∩ disjointed f j = ∅,
from assume i j hij, eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem $ assume x h,
have x ∈ f i, from h.left.left,
have x ∈ (⋂i<j, - f i), from h.right.right,
have x ∉ f i, begin simp at this; exact this _ hij end,
absurd ‹x ∈ f i› this,
show disjointed f i ∩ disjointed f j = ∅,
from (ne_iff_lt_or_gt.mp h).elim (this i j) begin rw [inter_comm], exact this j i end
lemma disjointed_Union {f : ℕ → set α} : (⋃n, disjointed f n) = (⋃n, f n) :=
subset.antisymm (Union_subset_Union $ assume i, inter_subset_left _ _) $
assume x h,
have ∃n, x ∈ f n, from (mem_Union_eq _ _).mp h,
have hn : ∀ (i : ℕ), i < nat.find this → x ∉ f i,
from assume i, nat.find_min this,
(mem_Union_eq _ _).mpr ⟨nat.find this, nat.find_spec this, by simp; assumption⟩
lemma disjointed_induct {f : ℕ → set α} {n : ℕ} {p : set α → Prop}
(h₁ : p (f n)) (h₂ : ∀t i, p t → p (t - f i)) :
p (disjointed f n) :=
have ∀n t, p t → p (t ∩ (⋂i<n, - f i)),
begin
intro n, induction n,
case nat.zero {
have h : (⋂ (i : ℕ) (H : i < 0), -f i) = univ,
{ apply eq_univ_of_forall,
simp [mem_Inter, nat.not_lt_zero] },
simp [h, inter_univ] },
case nat.succ n ih {
intro t,
have h : (⨅i (H : i < n.succ), -f i) = (⨅i (H : i < n), -f i) ⊓ - f n,
by simp [nat.lt_succ_iff_lt_or_eq, infi_or, infi_inf_eq, inf_comm],
change (⋂ (i : ℕ) (H : i < n.succ), -f i) = (⋂ (i : ℕ) (H : i < n), -f i) ∩ - f n at h,
rw [h, ←inter_assoc],
exact assume ht, h₂ _ _ (ih _ ht) }
end,
this _ _ h₁
lemma disjointed_of_mono {f : ℕ → set α} {n : ℕ} (hf : monotone f) :
disjointed f (n + 1) = f (n + 1) \ f n :=
have (⋂i (h : i < n + 1), -f i) = - f n,
from le_antisymm
(infi_le_of_le n $ infi_le_of_le (nat.lt_succ_self _) $ subset.refl _)
(le_infi $ assume i, le_infi $ assume hi, neg_le_neg $ hf $ nat.le_of_succ_le_succ hi),
by simp [disjointed, this, sdiff_eq]
end set
|
4b51bec769e9111db198147e147c8e2d5f4f9c3e | b7f22e51856f4989b970961f794f1c435f9b8f78 | /tests/lean/param_binder_update2.lean | 862c293e9ba3919a18481c82082555ee3bb3f67a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean | cb8aa01055ffe2af0fb99a16b4cda8463b882cd1 | 38607e3eb57f57f77c0ac114ad169e9e4262e24f | refs/heads/master | 1,611,187,284,081 | 1,450,766,737,000 | 1,476,122,547,000 | 11,513,992 | 2 | 0 | null | 1,401,763,102,000 | 1,374,182,235,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 372 | lean | section
parameters {A : Type} {B : Type}
definition foo1 (a : A) (b : B) := a
parameters (B) {A} -- Should not change the order of the parameters
definition foo2 (a : A) (b : B) := a
parameters {B} (A)
definition foo3 (a : A) (b : B) := a
parameters (A) (B)
definition foo4 (a : A) (b : B) := a
end
check @foo1
check @foo2
check @foo3
check @foo4
|
bce43aa5efcc866a71b0d8e90a49200b35dc8973 | 2a70b774d16dbdf5a533432ee0ebab6838df0948 | /_target/deps/mathlib/src/data/set/finite.lean | 1cbd5dc740c642cbadf3a31a6d11df4d861cb27b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | hjvromen/lewis | 40b035973df7c77ebf927afab7878c76d05ff758 | 105b675f73630f028ad5d890897a51b3c1146fb0 | refs/heads/master | 1,677,944,636,343 | 1,676,555,301,000 | 1,676,555,301,000 | 327,553,599 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 26,324 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import data.fintype.basic
/-!
# Finite sets
This file defines predicates `finite : set α → Prop` and `infinite : set α → Prop` and proves some
basic facts about finite sets.
-/
open set function
universes u v w x
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {ι : Sort w} {γ : Type x}
namespace set
/-- A set is finite if the subtype is a fintype, i.e. there is a
list that enumerates its members. -/
def finite (s : set α) : Prop := nonempty (fintype s)
/-- A set is infinite if it is not finite. -/
def infinite (s : set α) : Prop := ¬ finite s
/-- The subtype corresponding to a finite set is a finite type. Note
that because `finite` isn't a typeclass, this will not fire if it
is made into an instance -/
noncomputable def finite.fintype {s : set α} (h : finite s) : fintype s :=
classical.choice h
/-- Get a finset from a finite set -/
noncomputable def finite.to_finset {s : set α} (h : finite s) : finset α :=
@set.to_finset _ _ h.fintype
@[simp] theorem finite.mem_to_finset {s : set α} {h : finite s} {a : α} : a ∈ h.to_finset ↔ a ∈ s :=
@mem_to_finset _ _ h.fintype _
@[simp] theorem finite.to_finset.nonempty {s : set α} (h : finite s) :
h.to_finset.nonempty ↔ s.nonempty :=
show (∃ x, x ∈ h.to_finset) ↔ (∃ x, x ∈ s),
from exists_congr (λ _, finite.mem_to_finset)
@[simp] lemma finite.coe_to_finset {α} {s : set α} (h : finite s) : ↑h.to_finset = s :=
@set.coe_to_finset _ s h.fintype
theorem finite.exists_finset {s : set α} : finite s →
∃ s' : finset α, ∀ a : α, a ∈ s' ↔ a ∈ s
| ⟨h⟩ := by exactI ⟨to_finset s, λ _, mem_to_finset⟩
theorem finite.exists_finset_coe {s : set α} (hs : finite s) :
∃ s' : finset α, ↑s' = s :=
⟨hs.to_finset, hs.coe_to_finset⟩
/-- Finite sets can be lifted to finsets. -/
instance : can_lift (set α) (finset α) :=
{ coe := coe,
cond := finite,
prf := λ s hs, hs.exists_finset_coe }
theorem finite_mem_finset (s : finset α) : finite {a | a ∈ s} :=
⟨fintype.of_finset s (λ _, iff.rfl)⟩
theorem finite.of_fintype [fintype α] (s : set α) : finite s :=
by classical; exact ⟨set_fintype s⟩
theorem exists_finite_iff_finset {p : set α → Prop} :
(∃ s, finite s ∧ p s) ↔ ∃ s : finset α, p ↑s :=
⟨λ ⟨s, hs, hps⟩, ⟨hs.to_finset, hs.coe_to_finset.symm ▸ hps⟩,
λ ⟨s, hs⟩, ⟨↑s, finite_mem_finset s, hs⟩⟩
/-- Membership of a subset of a finite type is decidable.
Using this as an instance leads to potential loops with `subtype.fintype` under certain decidability
assumptions, so it should only be declared a local instance. -/
def decidable_mem_of_fintype [decidable_eq α] (s : set α) [fintype s] (a) : decidable (a ∈ s) :=
decidable_of_iff _ mem_to_finset
instance fintype_empty : fintype (∅ : set α) :=
fintype.of_finset ∅ $ by simp
theorem empty_card : fintype.card (∅ : set α) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem empty_card' {h : fintype.{u} (∅ : set α)} :
@fintype.card (∅ : set α) h = 0 :=
eq.trans (by congr) empty_card
@[simp] theorem finite_empty : @finite α ∅ := ⟨set.fintype_empty⟩
instance finite.inhabited : inhabited {s : set α // finite s} := ⟨⟨∅, finite_empty⟩⟩
/-- A `fintype` structure on `insert a s`. -/
def fintype_insert' {a : α} (s : set α) [fintype s] (h : a ∉ s) : fintype (insert a s : set α) :=
fintype.of_finset ⟨a ::ₘ s.to_finset.1,
multiset.nodup_cons_of_nodup (by simp [h]) s.to_finset.2⟩ $ by simp
theorem card_fintype_insert' {a : α} (s : set α) [fintype s] (h : a ∉ s) :
@fintype.card _ (fintype_insert' s h) = fintype.card s + 1 :=
by rw [fintype_insert', fintype.card_of_finset];
simp [finset.card, to_finset]; refl
@[simp] theorem card_insert {a : α} (s : set α)
[fintype s] (h : a ∉ s) {d : fintype.{u} (insert a s : set α)} :
@fintype.card _ d = fintype.card s + 1 :=
by rw ← card_fintype_insert' s h; congr
lemma card_image_of_inj_on {s : set α} [fintype s]
{f : α → β} [fintype (f '' s)] (H : ∀x∈s, ∀y∈s, f x = f y → x = y) :
fintype.card (f '' s) = fintype.card s :=
by haveI := classical.prop_decidable; exact
calc fintype.card (f '' s) = (s.to_finset.image f).card : fintype.card_of_finset' _ (by simp)
... = s.to_finset.card : finset.card_image_of_inj_on
(λ x hx y hy hxy, H x (mem_to_finset.1 hx) y (mem_to_finset.1 hy) hxy)
... = fintype.card s : (fintype.card_of_finset' _ (λ a, mem_to_finset)).symm
lemma card_image_of_injective (s : set α) [fintype s]
{f : α → β} [fintype (f '' s)] (H : function.injective f) :
fintype.card (f '' s) = fintype.card s :=
card_image_of_inj_on $ λ _ _ _ _ h, H h
section
local attribute [instance] decidable_mem_of_fintype
instance fintype_insert [decidable_eq α] (a : α) (s : set α) [fintype s] :
fintype (insert a s : set α) :=
if h : a ∈ s then by rwa [insert_eq, union_eq_self_of_subset_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 h)]
else fintype_insert' _ h
end
@[simp] theorem finite.insert (a : α) {s : set α} : finite s → finite (insert a s)
| ⟨h⟩ := ⟨@set.fintype_insert _ (classical.dec_eq α) _ _ h⟩
lemma to_finset_insert [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {s : set α} (hs : finite s) :
(hs.insert a).to_finset = insert a hs.to_finset :=
finset.ext $ by simp
@[elab_as_eliminator]
theorem finite.induction_on {C : set α → Prop} {s : set α} (h : finite s)
(H0 : C ∅) (H1 : ∀ {a s}, a ∉ s → finite s → C s → C (insert a s)) : C s :=
let ⟨t⟩ := h in by exactI
match s.to_finset, @mem_to_finset _ s _ with
| ⟨l, nd⟩, al := begin
change ∀ a, a ∈ l ↔ a ∈ s at al,
clear _let_match _match t h, revert s nd al,
refine multiset.induction_on l _ (λ a l IH, _); intros s nd al,
{ rw show s = ∅, from eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 (by simpa using al),
exact H0 },
{ rw ← show insert a {x | x ∈ l} = s, from set.ext (by simpa using al),
cases multiset.nodup_cons.1 nd with m nd',
refine H1 _ ⟨finset.subtype.fintype ⟨l, nd'⟩⟩ (IH nd' (λ _, iff.rfl)),
exact m }
end
end
@[elab_as_eliminator]
theorem finite.dinduction_on {C : ∀s:set α, finite s → Prop} {s : set α} (h : finite s)
(H0 : C ∅ finite_empty)
(H1 : ∀ {a s}, a ∉ s → ∀h:finite s, C s h → C (insert a s) (h.insert a)) :
C s h :=
have ∀h:finite s, C s h,
from finite.induction_on h (assume h, H0) (assume a s has hs ih h, H1 has hs (ih _)),
this h
instance fintype_singleton (a : α) : fintype ({a} : set α) :=
unique.fintype
@[simp] theorem card_singleton (a : α) :
fintype.card ({a} : set α) = 1 :=
fintype.card_of_subsingleton _
@[simp] theorem finite_singleton (a : α) : finite ({a} : set α) :=
⟨set.fintype_singleton _⟩
instance fintype_pure : ∀ a : α, fintype (pure a : set α) :=
set.fintype_singleton
theorem finite_pure (a : α) : finite (pure a : set α) :=
⟨set.fintype_pure a⟩
instance fintype_univ [fintype α] : fintype (@univ α) :=
fintype.of_equiv α $ (equiv.set.univ α).symm
theorem finite_univ [fintype α] : finite (@univ α) := ⟨set.fintype_univ⟩
theorem infinite_univ_iff : (@univ α).infinite ↔ _root_.infinite α :=
⟨λ h₁, ⟨λ h₂, h₁ $ @finite_univ α h₂⟩,
λ ⟨h₁⟩ ⟨h₂⟩, h₁ $ @fintype.of_equiv _ _ h₂ $ equiv.set.univ _⟩
theorem infinite_univ [h : _root_.infinite α] : infinite (@univ α) :=
infinite_univ_iff.2 h
theorem infinite_coe_iff {s : set α} : _root_.infinite s ↔ infinite s :=
⟨λ ⟨h₁⟩ h₂, h₁ h₂.some, λ h₁, ⟨λ h₂, h₁ ⟨h₂⟩⟩⟩
theorem infinite.to_subtype {s : set α} (h : infinite s) : _root_.infinite s :=
infinite_coe_iff.2 h
/-- Embedding of `ℕ` into an infinite set. -/
noncomputable def infinite.nat_embedding (s : set α) (h : infinite s) : ℕ ↪ s :=
by { haveI := h.to_subtype, exact infinite.nat_embedding s }
lemma infinite.exists_subset_card_eq {s : set α} (hs : infinite s) (n : ℕ) :
∃ t : finset α, ↑t ⊆ s ∧ t.card = n :=
⟨((finset.range n).map (hs.nat_embedding _)).map (embedding.subtype _), by simp⟩
instance fintype_union [decidable_eq α] (s t : set α) [fintype s] [fintype t] :
fintype (s ∪ t : set α) :=
fintype.of_finset (s.to_finset ∪ t.to_finset) $ by simp
theorem finite.union {s t : set α} : finite s → finite t → finite (s ∪ t)
| ⟨hs⟩ ⟨ht⟩ := ⟨@set.fintype_union _ (classical.dec_eq α) _ _ hs ht⟩
instance fintype_sep (s : set α) (p : α → Prop) [fintype s] [decidable_pred p] :
fintype ({a ∈ s | p a} : set α) :=
fintype.of_finset (s.to_finset.filter p) $ by simp
instance fintype_inter (s t : set α) [fintype s] [decidable_pred t] : fintype (s ∩ t : set α) :=
set.fintype_sep s t
/-- A `fintype` structure on a set defines a `fintype` structure on its subset. -/
def fintype_subset (s : set α) {t : set α} [fintype s] [decidable_pred t] (h : t ⊆ s) : fintype t :=
by rw ← inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h; apply_instance
theorem finite.subset {s : set α} : finite s → ∀ {t : set α}, t ⊆ s → finite t
| ⟨hs⟩ t h := ⟨@set.fintype_subset _ _ _ hs (classical.dec_pred t) h⟩
theorem infinite_mono {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : infinite s → infinite t :=
mt (λ ht, ht.subset h)
instance fintype_image [decidable_eq β] (s : set α) (f : α → β) [fintype s] : fintype (f '' s) :=
fintype.of_finset (s.to_finset.image f) $ by simp
instance fintype_range [decidable_eq β] (f : α → β) [fintype α] : fintype (range f) :=
fintype.of_finset (finset.univ.image f) $ by simp [range]
theorem finite_range (f : α → β) [fintype α] : finite (range f) :=
by haveI := classical.dec_eq β; exact ⟨by apply_instance⟩
theorem finite.image {s : set α} (f : α → β) : finite s → finite (f '' s)
| ⟨h⟩ := ⟨@set.fintype_image _ _ (classical.dec_eq β) _ _ h⟩
theorem infinite_of_infinite_image (f : α → β) {s : set α} (hs : (f '' s).infinite) :
s.infinite :=
mt (finite.image f) hs
lemma finite.dependent_image {s : set α} (hs : finite s) {F : Π i ∈ s, β} {t : set β}
(H : ∀ y ∈ t, ∃ x (hx : x ∈ s), y = F x hx) : set.finite t :=
begin
let G : s → β := λ x, F x.1 x.2,
have A : t ⊆ set.range G,
{ assume y hy,
rcases H y hy with ⟨x, hx, xy⟩,
refine ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, xy.symm⟩ },
letI : fintype s := finite.fintype hs,
exact (finite_range G).subset A
end
instance fintype_map {α β} [decidable_eq β] :
∀ (s : set α) (f : α → β) [fintype s], fintype (f <$> s) := set.fintype_image
theorem finite.map {α β} {s : set α} :
∀ (f : α → β), finite s → finite (f <$> s) := finite.image
/-- If a function `f` has a partial inverse and sends a set `s` to a set with `[fintype]` instance,
then `s` has a `fintype` structure as well. -/
def fintype_of_fintype_image (s : set α)
{f : α → β} {g} (I : is_partial_inv f g) [fintype (f '' s)] : fintype s :=
fintype.of_finset ⟨_, @multiset.nodup_filter_map β α g _
(@injective_of_partial_inv_right _ _ f g I) (f '' s).to_finset.2⟩ $ λ a,
begin
suffices : (∃ b x, f x = b ∧ g b = some a ∧ x ∈ s) ↔ a ∈ s,
by simpa [exists_and_distrib_left.symm, and.comm, and.left_comm, and.assoc],
rw exists_swap,
suffices : (∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ g (f x) = some a) ↔ a ∈ s, {simpa [and.comm, and.left_comm, and.assoc]},
simp [I _, (injective_of_partial_inv I).eq_iff]
end
theorem finite_of_finite_image {s : set α} {f : α → β} (hi : set.inj_on f s) :
finite (f '' s) → finite s | ⟨h⟩ :=
⟨@fintype.of_injective _ _ h (λa:s, ⟨f a.1, mem_image_of_mem f a.2⟩) $
assume a b eq, subtype.eq $ hi a.2 b.2 $ subtype.ext_iff_val.1 eq⟩
theorem finite_image_iff {s : set α} {f : α → β} (hi : inj_on f s) :
finite (f '' s) ↔ finite s :=
⟨finite_of_finite_image hi, finite.image _⟩
theorem infinite_image_iff {s : set α} {f : α → β} (hi : inj_on f s) :
infinite (f '' s) ↔ infinite s :=
not_congr $ finite_image_iff hi
theorem infinite_of_inj_on_maps_to {s : set α} {t : set β} {f : α → β}
(hi : inj_on f s) (hm : maps_to f s t) (hs : infinite s) : infinite t :=
infinite_mono (maps_to'.mp hm) $ (infinite_image_iff hi).2 hs
theorem infinite_range_of_injective [_root_.infinite α] {f : α → β} (hi : injective f) :
infinite (range f) :=
by { rw [←image_univ, infinite_image_iff (inj_on_of_injective hi _)], exact infinite_univ }
theorem infinite_of_injective_forall_mem [_root_.infinite α] {s : set β} {f : α → β}
(hi : injective f) (hf : ∀ x : α, f x ∈ s) : infinite s :=
by { rw ←range_subset_iff at hf, exact infinite_mono hf (infinite_range_of_injective hi) }
theorem finite.preimage {s : set β} {f : α → β}
(I : set.inj_on f (f⁻¹' s)) (h : finite s) : finite (f ⁻¹' s) :=
finite_of_finite_image I (h.subset (image_preimage_subset f s))
theorem finite.preimage_embedding {s : set β} (f : α ↪ β) (h : s.finite) : (f ⁻¹' s).finite :=
finite.preimage (λ _ _ _ _ h', f.injective h') h
instance fintype_Union [decidable_eq α] {ι : Type*} [fintype ι]
(f : ι → set α) [∀ i, fintype (f i)] : fintype (⋃ i, f i) :=
fintype.of_finset (finset.univ.bind (λ i, (f i).to_finset)) $ by simp
theorem finite_Union {ι : Type*} [fintype ι] {f : ι → set α} (H : ∀i, finite (f i)) :
finite (⋃ i, f i) :=
⟨@set.fintype_Union _ (classical.dec_eq α) _ _ _ (λ i, finite.fintype (H i))⟩
/-- A union of sets with `fintype` structure over a set with `fintype` structure has a `fintype`
structure. -/
def fintype_bUnion [decidable_eq α] {ι : Type*} {s : set ι} [fintype s]
(f : ι → set α) (H : ∀ i ∈ s, fintype (f i)) : fintype (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
by rw bUnion_eq_Union; exact
@set.fintype_Union _ _ _ _ _ (by rintro ⟨i, hi⟩; exact H i hi)
instance fintype_bUnion' [decidable_eq α] {ι : Type*} {s : set ι} [fintype s]
(f : ι → set α) [H : ∀ i, fintype (f i)] : fintype (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
fintype_bUnion _ (λ i _, H i)
theorem finite.sUnion {s : set (set α)} (h : finite s) (H : ∀t∈s, finite t) : finite (⋃₀ s) :=
by rw sUnion_eq_Union; haveI := finite.fintype h;
apply finite_Union; simpa using H
theorem finite.bUnion {α} {ι : Type*} {s : set ι} {f : Π i ∈ s, set α} :
finite s → (∀ i ∈ s, finite (f i ‹_›)) → finite (⋃ i∈s, f i ‹_›)
| ⟨hs⟩ h := by rw [bUnion_eq_Union]; exactI finite_Union (λ i, h _ _)
instance fintype_lt_nat (n : ℕ) : fintype {i | i < n} :=
fintype.of_finset (finset.range n) $ by simp
instance fintype_le_nat (n : ℕ) : fintype {i | i ≤ n} :=
by simpa [nat.lt_succ_iff] using set.fintype_lt_nat (n+1)
lemma finite_le_nat (n : ℕ) : finite {i | i ≤ n} := ⟨set.fintype_le_nat _⟩
lemma finite_lt_nat (n : ℕ) : finite {i | i < n} := ⟨set.fintype_lt_nat _⟩
instance fintype_prod (s : set α) (t : set β) [fintype s] [fintype t] : fintype (set.prod s t) :=
fintype.of_finset (s.to_finset.product t.to_finset) $ by simp
lemma finite.prod {s : set α} {t : set β} : finite s → finite t → finite (set.prod s t)
| ⟨hs⟩ ⟨ht⟩ := by exactI ⟨set.fintype_prod s t⟩
/-- `image2 f s t` is finitype if `s` and `t` are. -/
instance fintype_image2 [decidable_eq γ] (f : α → β → γ) (s : set α) (t : set β)
[hs : fintype s] [ht : fintype t] : fintype (image2 f s t : set γ) :=
by { rw ← image_prod, apply set.fintype_image }
lemma finite.image2 (f : α → β → γ) {s : set α} {t : set β} (hs : finite s) (ht : finite t) :
finite (image2 f s t) :=
by { rw ← image_prod, exact (hs.prod ht).image _ }
/-- If `s : set α` is a set with `fintype` instance and `f : α → set β` is a function such that
each `f a`, `a ∈ s`, has a `fintype` structure, then `s >>= f` has a `fintype` structure. -/
def fintype_bind {α β} [decidable_eq β] (s : set α) [fintype s]
(f : α → set β) (H : ∀ a ∈ s, fintype (f a)) : fintype (s >>= f) :=
set.fintype_bUnion _ H
instance fintype_bind' {α β} [decidable_eq β] (s : set α) [fintype s]
(f : α → set β) [H : ∀ a, fintype (f a)] : fintype (s >>= f) :=
fintype_bind _ _ (λ i _, H i)
theorem finite_bind {α β} {s : set α} {f : α → set β} :
finite s → (∀ a ∈ s, finite (f a)) → finite (s >>= f)
| ⟨hs⟩ H := ⟨@fintype_bind _ _ (classical.dec_eq β) _ hs _ (λ a ha, (H a ha).fintype)⟩
instance fintype_seq {α β : Type u} [decidable_eq β]
(f : set (α → β)) (s : set α) [fintype f] [fintype s] :
fintype (f <*> s) :=
by rw seq_eq_bind_map; apply set.fintype_bind'
theorem finite.seq {α β : Type u} {f : set (α → β)} {s : set α} :
finite f → finite s → finite (f <*> s)
| ⟨hf⟩ ⟨hs⟩ := by { haveI := classical.dec_eq β, exactI ⟨set.fintype_seq _ _⟩ }
/-- There are finitely many subsets of a given finite set -/
lemma finite.finite_subsets {α : Type u} {a : set α} (h : finite a) : finite {b | b ⊆ a} :=
begin
-- we just need to translate the result, already known for finsets,
-- to the language of finite sets
let s : set (set α) := coe '' (↑(finset.powerset (finite.to_finset h)) : set (finset α)),
have : finite s := (finite_mem_finset _).image _,
apply this.subset,
refine λ b hb, ⟨(h.subset hb).to_finset, _, finite.coe_to_finset _⟩,
simpa [finset.subset_iff]
end
lemma exists_min_image [linear_order β] (s : set α) (f : α → β) (h1 : finite s) :
s.nonempty → ∃ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ s, f a ≤ f b
| ⟨x, hx⟩ := by simpa only [exists_prop, finite.mem_to_finset]
using (finite.to_finset h1).exists_min_image f ⟨x, finite.mem_to_finset.2 hx⟩
lemma exists_max_image [linear_order β] (s : set α) (f : α → β) (h1 : finite s) :
s.nonempty → ∃ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ s, f b ≤ f a
| ⟨x, hx⟩ := by simpa only [exists_prop, finite.mem_to_finset]
using (finite.to_finset h1).exists_max_image f ⟨x, finite.mem_to_finset.2 hx⟩
end set
namespace finset
variables [decidable_eq β]
variables {s : finset α}
lemma finite_to_set (s : finset α) : set.finite (↑s : set α) :=
set.finite_mem_finset s
@[simp] lemma coe_bind {f : α → finset β} : ↑(s.bind f) = (⋃x ∈ (↑s : set α), ↑(f x) : set β) :=
by simp [set.ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma finite_to_set_to_finset {α : Type*} (s : finset α) :
(finite_to_set s).to_finset = s :=
by { ext, rw [set.finite.mem_to_finset, mem_coe] }
end finset
namespace set
lemma finite_subset_Union {s : set α} (hs : finite s)
{ι} {t : ι → set α} (h : s ⊆ ⋃ i, t i) : ∃ I : set ι, finite I ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ I, t i :=
begin
casesI hs,
choose f hf using show ∀ x : s, ∃ i, x.1 ∈ t i, {simpa [subset_def] using h},
refine ⟨range f, finite_range f, _⟩,
rintro x hx,
simp,
exact ⟨x, ⟨hx, hf _⟩⟩,
end
lemma eq_finite_Union_of_finite_subset_Union {ι} {s : ι → set α} {t : set α} (tfin : finite t)
(h : t ⊆ ⋃ i, s i) :
∃ I : set ι, (finite I) ∧ ∃ σ : {i | i ∈ I} → set α,
(∀ i, finite (σ i)) ∧ (∀ i, σ i ⊆ s i) ∧ t = ⋃ i, σ i :=
let ⟨I, Ifin, hI⟩ := finite_subset_Union tfin h in
⟨I, Ifin, λ x, s x ∩ t,
λ i, tfin.subset (inter_subset_right _ _),
λ i, inter_subset_left _ _,
begin
ext x,
rw mem_Union,
split,
{ intro x_in,
rcases mem_Union.mp (hI x_in) with ⟨i, _, ⟨hi, rfl⟩, H⟩,
use [i, hi, H, x_in] },
{ rintros ⟨i, hi, H⟩,
exact H }
end⟩
/-- An increasing union distributes over finite intersection. -/
lemma Union_Inter_of_monotone {ι ι' α : Type*} [fintype ι] [linear_order ι']
[nonempty ι'] {s : ι → ι' → set α} (hs : ∀ i, monotone (s i)) :
(⋃ j : ι', ⋂ i : ι, s i j) = ⋂ i : ι, ⋃ j : ι', s i j :=
begin
ext x, refine ⟨λ hx, Union_Inter_subset hx, λ hx, _⟩,
simp only [mem_Inter, mem_Union, mem_Inter] at hx ⊢, choose j hj using hx,
obtain ⟨j₀⟩ := show nonempty ι', by apply_instance,
refine ⟨finset.univ.fold max j₀ j, λ i, hs i _ (hj i)⟩,
rw [finset.fold_op_rel_iff_or (@le_max_iff _ _)],
exact or.inr ⟨i, finset.mem_univ i, le_rfl⟩
end
instance nat.fintype_Iio (n : ℕ) : fintype (Iio n) :=
fintype.of_finset (finset.range n) $ by simp
/--
If `P` is some relation between terms of `γ` and sets in `γ`,
such that every finite set `t : set γ` has some `c : γ` related to it,
then there is a recursively defined sequence `u` in `γ`
so `u n` is related to the image of `{0, 1, ..., n-1}` under `u`.
(We use this later to show sequentially compact sets
are totally bounded.)
-/
lemma seq_of_forall_finite_exists {γ : Type*}
{P : γ → set γ → Prop} (h : ∀ t, finite t → ∃ c, P c t) :
∃ u : ℕ → γ, ∀ n, P (u n) (u '' Iio n) :=
⟨λ n, @nat.strong_rec_on' (λ _, γ) n $ λ n ih, classical.some $ h
(range $ λ m : Iio n, ih m.1 m.2)
(finite_range _),
λ n, begin
classical,
refine nat.strong_rec_on' n (λ n ih, _),
rw nat.strong_rec_on_beta', convert classical.some_spec (h _ _),
ext x, split,
{ rintros ⟨m, hmn, rfl⟩, exact ⟨⟨m, hmn⟩, rfl⟩ },
{ rintros ⟨⟨m, hmn⟩, rfl⟩, exact ⟨m, hmn, rfl⟩ }
end⟩
lemma finite_range_ite {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] {f g : α → β} (hf : finite (range f))
(hg : finite (range g)) : finite (range (λ x, if p x then f x else g x)) :=
(hf.union hg).subset range_ite_subset
lemma finite_range_const {c : β} : finite (range (λ x : α, c)) :=
(finite_singleton c).subset range_const_subset
lemma range_find_greatest_subset {P : α → ℕ → Prop} [∀ x, decidable_pred (P x)] {b : ℕ}:
range (λ x, nat.find_greatest (P x) b) ⊆ ↑(finset.range (b + 1)) :=
by { rw range_subset_iff, assume x, simp [nat.lt_succ_iff, nat.find_greatest_le] }
lemma finite_range_find_greatest {P : α → ℕ → Prop} [∀ x, decidable_pred (P x)] {b : ℕ} :
finite (range (λ x, nat.find_greatest (P x) b)) :=
(finset.range (b + 1)).finite_to_set.subset range_find_greatest_subset
lemma card_lt_card {s t : set α} [fintype s] [fintype t] (h : s ⊂ t) :
fintype.card s < fintype.card t :=
begin
rw [← s.coe_to_finset, ← t.coe_to_finset, finset.coe_ssubset] at h,
rw [fintype.card_of_finset' _ (λ x, mem_to_finset),
fintype.card_of_finset' _ (λ x, mem_to_finset)],
exact finset.card_lt_card h,
end
lemma card_le_of_subset {s t : set α} [fintype s] [fintype t] (hsub : s ⊆ t) :
fintype.card s ≤ fintype.card t :=
calc fintype.card s = s.to_finset.card : fintype.card_of_finset' _ (by simp)
... ≤ t.to_finset.card : finset.card_le_of_subset (λ x hx, by simp [set.subset_def, *] at *)
... = fintype.card t : eq.symm (fintype.card_of_finset' _ (by simp))
lemma eq_of_subset_of_card_le {s t : set α} [fintype s] [fintype t]
(hsub : s ⊆ t) (hcard : fintype.card t ≤ fintype.card s) : s = t :=
(eq_or_ssubset_of_subset hsub).elim id
(λ h, absurd hcard $ not_le_of_lt $ card_lt_card h)
lemma card_range_of_injective [fintype α] {f : α → β} (hf : injective f)
[fintype (range f)] : fintype.card (range f) = fintype.card α :=
eq.symm $ fintype.card_congr $ equiv.set.range f hf
lemma finite.exists_maximal_wrt [partial_order β] (f : α → β) (s : set α) (h : set.finite s) :
s.nonempty → ∃a∈s, ∀a'∈s, f a ≤ f a' → f a = f a' :=
begin
classical,
refine h.induction_on _ _,
{ assume h, exact absurd h empty_not_nonempty },
assume a s his _ ih _,
cases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with h h,
{ use a, simp [h] },
rcases ih h with ⟨b, hb, ih⟩,
by_cases f b ≤ f a,
{ refine ⟨a, set.mem_insert _ _, assume c hc hac, le_antisymm hac _⟩,
rcases set.mem_insert_iff.1 hc with rfl | hcs,
{ refl },
{ rwa [← ih c hcs (le_trans h hac)] } },
{ refine ⟨b, set.mem_insert_of_mem _ hb, assume c hc hbc, _⟩,
rcases set.mem_insert_iff.1 hc with rfl | hcs,
{ exact (h hbc).elim },
{ exact ih c hcs hbc } }
end
lemma finite.card_to_finset {s : set α} [fintype s] (h : s.finite) :
h.to_finset.card = fintype.card s :=
by { rw [← finset.card_attach, finset.attach_eq_univ, ← fintype.card], congr' 2, funext,
rw set.finite.mem_to_finset }
section
local attribute [instance, priority 1] classical.prop_decidable
lemma to_finset_inter {α : Type*} [fintype α] (s t : set α) :
(s ∩ t).to_finset = s.to_finset ∩ t.to_finset :=
by ext; simp
end
section
variables [semilattice_sup α] [nonempty α] {s : set α}
/--A finite set is bounded above.-/
protected lemma finite.bdd_above (hs : finite s) : bdd_above s :=
finite.induction_on hs bdd_above_empty $ λ a s _ _ h, h.insert a
/--A finite union of sets which are all bounded above is still bounded above.-/
lemma finite.bdd_above_bUnion {I : set β} {S : β → set α} (H : finite I) :
(bdd_above (⋃i∈I, S i)) ↔ (∀i ∈ I, bdd_above (S i)) :=
finite.induction_on H
(by simp only [bUnion_empty, bdd_above_empty, ball_empty_iff])
(λ a s ha _ hs, by simp only [bUnion_insert, ball_insert_iff, bdd_above_union, hs])
end
section
variables [semilattice_inf α] [nonempty α] {s : set α}
/--A finite set is bounded below.-/
protected lemma finite.bdd_below (hs : finite s) : bdd_below s :=
@finite.bdd_above (order_dual α) _ _ _ hs
/--A finite union of sets which are all bounded below is still bounded below.-/
lemma finite.bdd_below_bUnion {I : set β} {S : β → set α} (H : finite I) :
(bdd_below (⋃i∈I, S i)) ↔ (∀i ∈ I, bdd_below (S i)) :=
@finite.bdd_above_bUnion (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _ H
end
end set
namespace finset
/-- A finset is bounded above. -/
protected lemma bdd_above [semilattice_sup α] [nonempty α] (s : finset α) :
bdd_above (↑s : set α) :=
s.finite_to_set.bdd_above
/-- A finset is bounded below. -/
protected lemma bdd_below [semilattice_inf α] [nonempty α] (s : finset α) :
bdd_below (↑s : set α) :=
s.finite_to_set.bdd_below
end finset
lemma fintype.exists_max [fintype α] [nonempty α]
{β : Type*} [linear_order β] (f : α → β) :
∃ x₀ : α, ∀ x, f x ≤ f x₀ :=
begin
rcases set.finite_univ.exists_maximal_wrt f _ univ_nonempty with ⟨x, _, hx⟩,
exact ⟨x, λ y, (le_total (f x) (f y)).elim (λ h, ge_of_eq $ hx _ trivial h) id⟩
end
|
1a94f851ead7157eafc60d41b6a0c33ebbc2c215 | 1abd1ed12aa68b375cdef28959f39531c6e95b84 | /src/set_theory/cardinal.lean | 8b2c46c9a6d7fba2c4b753bca570d5b33f6dd7f7 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jumpy4/mathlib | d3829e75173012833e9f15ac16e481e17596de0f | af36f1a35f279f0e5b3c2a77647c6bf2cfd51a13 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,508,842,818 | 1,636,203,271,000 | 1,636,203,271,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 59,292 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import data.set.countable
import set_theory.schroeder_bernstein
import data.fintype.card
import data.nat.enat
/-!
# Cardinal Numbers
We define cardinal numbers as a quotient of types under the equivalence relation of equinumerity.
## Main definitions
* `cardinal` the type of cardinal numbers (in a given universe).
* `cardinal.mk α` or `#α` is the cardinality of `α`. The notation `#` lives in the locale
`cardinal`.
* There is an instance that `cardinal` forms a `canonically_ordered_comm_semiring`.
* Addition `c₁ + c₂` is defined by `cardinal.add_def α β : #α + #β = #(α ⊕ β)`.
* Multiplication `c₁ * c₂` is defined by `cardinal.mul_def : #α * #β = #(α * β)`.
* The order `c₁ ≤ c₂` is defined by `cardinal.le_def α β : #α ≤ #β ↔ nonempty (α ↪ β)`.
* Exponentiation `c₁ ^ c₂` is defined by `cardinal.power_def α β : #α ^ #β = #(β → α)`.
* `cardinal.omega` or `ω` the cardinality of `ℕ`. This definition is universe polymorphic:
`cardinal.omega.{u} : cardinal.{u}`
(contrast with `ℕ : Type`, which lives in a specific universe).
In some cases the universe level has to be given explicitly.
* `cardinal.min (I : nonempty ι) (c : ι → cardinal)` is the minimal cardinal in the range of `c`.
* `cardinal.succ c` is the successor cardinal, the smallest cardinal larger than `c`.
* `cardinal.sum` is the sum of a collection of cardinals.
* `cardinal.sup` is the supremum of a collection of cardinals.
* `cardinal.powerlt c₁ c₂` or `c₁ ^< c₂` is defined as `sup_{γ < β} α^γ`.
## Main Statements
* Cantor's theorem: `cardinal.cantor c : c < 2 ^ c`.
* König's theorem: `cardinal.sum_lt_prod`
## Implementation notes
* There is a type of cardinal numbers in every universe level:
`cardinal.{u} : Type (u + 1)` is the quotient of types in `Type u`.
The operation `cardinal.lift` lifts cardinal numbers to a higher level.
* Cardinal arithmetic specifically for infinite cardinals (like `κ * κ = κ`) is in the file
`set_theory/cardinal_ordinal.lean`.
* There is an instance `has_pow cardinal`, but this will only fire if Lean already knows that both
the base and the exponent live in the same universe. As a workaround, you can add
```
local infixr ^ := @has_pow.pow cardinal cardinal cardinal.has_pow
```
to a file. This notation will work even if Lean doesn't know yet that the base and the exponent
live in the same universe (but no exponents in other types can be used).
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinal_number>
## Tags
cardinal number, cardinal arithmetic, cardinal exponentiation, omega,
Cantor's theorem, König's theorem, Konig's theorem
-/
open function set
open_locale classical
universes u v w x
variables {α β : Type u}
/-- The equivalence relation on types given by equivalence (bijective correspondence) of types.
Quotienting by this equivalence relation gives the cardinal numbers.
-/
instance cardinal.is_equivalent : setoid (Type u) :=
{ r := λα β, nonempty (α ≃ β),
iseqv := ⟨λα,
⟨equiv.refl α⟩,
λα β ⟨e⟩, ⟨e.symm⟩,
λα β γ ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩, ⟨e₁.trans e₂⟩⟩ }
/-- `cardinal.{u}` is the type of cardinal numbers in `Type u`,
defined as the quotient of `Type u` by existence of an equivalence
(a bijection with explicit inverse). -/
def cardinal : Type (u + 1) := quotient cardinal.is_equivalent
namespace cardinal
/-- The cardinal number of a type -/
def mk : Type u → cardinal := quotient.mk
localized "notation `#` := cardinal.mk" in cardinal
instance can_lift_cardinal_Type : can_lift cardinal.{u} (Type u) :=
⟨mk, λ c, true, λ c _, quot.induction_on c $ λ α, ⟨α, rfl⟩⟩
@[elab_as_eliminator]
lemma induction_on {p : cardinal → Prop} (c : cardinal) (h : ∀ α, p (#α)) : p c :=
quotient.induction_on c h
@[elab_as_eliminator]
lemma induction_on₂ {p : cardinal → cardinal → Prop} (c₁ : cardinal) (c₂ : cardinal)
(h : ∀ α β, p (#α) (#β)) : p c₁ c₂ :=
quotient.induction_on₂ c₁ c₂ h
@[elab_as_eliminator]
lemma induction_on₃ {p : cardinal → cardinal → cardinal → Prop} (c₁ : cardinal) (c₂ : cardinal)
(c₃ : cardinal) (h : ∀ α β γ, p (#α) (#β) (#γ)) : p c₁ c₂ c₃ :=
quotient.induction_on₃ c₁ c₂ c₃ h
protected lemma eq : #α = #β ↔ nonempty (α ≃ β) := quotient.eq
@[simp] theorem mk_def (α : Type u) : @eq cardinal ⟦α⟧ (#α) := rfl
@[simp] theorem mk_out (c : cardinal) : #(c.out) = c := quotient.out_eq _
/-- The representative of the cardinal of a type is equivalent ot the original type. -/
noncomputable def out_mk_equiv {α : Type v} : (#α).out ≃ α :=
nonempty.some $ cardinal.eq.mp (by simp)
lemma mk_congr (e : α ≃ β) : # α = # β := quot.sound ⟨e⟩
alias mk_congr ← equiv.cardinal_eq
/-- Lift a function between `Type*`s to a function between `cardinal`s. -/
def map (f : Type u → Type v) (hf : ∀ α β, α ≃ β → f α ≃ f β) :
cardinal.{u} → cardinal.{v} :=
quotient.map f (λ α β ⟨e⟩, ⟨hf α β e⟩)
@[simp] lemma map_mk (f : Type u → Type v) (hf : ∀ α β, α ≃ β → f α ≃ f β) (α : Type u) :
map f hf (#α) = #(f α) := rfl
/-- Lift a binary operation `Type* → Type* → Type*` to a binary operation on `cardinal`s. -/
def map₂ (f : Type u → Type v → Type w) (hf : ∀ α β γ δ, α ≃ β → γ ≃ δ → f α γ ≃ f β δ) :
cardinal.{u} → cardinal.{v} → cardinal.{w} :=
quotient.map₂ f $ λ α β ⟨e₁⟩ γ δ ⟨e₂⟩, ⟨hf α β γ δ e₁ e₂⟩
/-- The universe lift operation on cardinals. You can specify the universes explicitly with
`lift.{u v} : cardinal.{v} → cardinal.{max v u}` -/
def lift (c : cardinal.{v}) : cardinal.{max v u} :=
map ulift (λ α β e, equiv.ulift.trans $ e.trans equiv.ulift.symm) c
@[simp] theorem mk_ulift (α) : #(ulift.{v u} α) = lift.{v} (#α) := rfl
theorem lift_umax : lift.{(max u v) u} = lift.{v u} :=
funext $ λ a, induction_on a $ λ α, (equiv.ulift.trans equiv.ulift.symm).cardinal_eq
theorem lift_umax' : lift.{(max v u) u} = lift.{v u} := lift_umax
theorem lift_id' (a : cardinal.{max u v}) : lift.{u} a = a :=
induction_on a $ λ α, mk_congr equiv.ulift
@[simp] theorem lift_id (a : cardinal) : lift.{u u} a = a := lift_id'.{u u} a
@[simp] theorem lift_uzero (a : cardinal.{u}) : lift.{0} a = a := lift_id'.{0 u} a
@[simp] theorem lift_lift (a : cardinal) :
lift.{w} (lift.{v} a) = lift.{(max v w)} a :=
induction_on a $ λ α,
(equiv.ulift.trans $ equiv.ulift.trans equiv.ulift.symm).cardinal_eq
/-- We define the order on cardinal numbers by `#α ≤ #β` if and only if
there exists an embedding (injective function) from α to β. -/
instance : has_le cardinal.{u} :=
⟨λq₁ q₂, quotient.lift_on₂ q₁ q₂ (λα β, nonempty $ α ↪ β) $
assume α β γ δ ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩,
propext ⟨assume ⟨e⟩, ⟨e.congr e₁ e₂⟩, assume ⟨e⟩, ⟨e.congr e₁.symm e₂.symm⟩⟩⟩
theorem le_def (α β : Type u) : #α ≤ #β ↔ nonempty (α ↪ β) :=
iff.rfl
theorem mk_le_of_injective {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} (hf : injective f) : #α ≤ #β :=
⟨⟨f, hf⟩⟩
theorem _root_.function.embedding.cardinal_le {α β : Type u} (f : α ↪ β) : #α ≤ #β := ⟨f⟩
theorem mk_le_of_surjective {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} (hf : surjective f) : #β ≤ #α :=
⟨embedding.of_surjective f hf⟩
theorem le_mk_iff_exists_set {c : cardinal} {α : Type u} :
c ≤ #α ↔ ∃ p : set α, #p = c :=
⟨induction_on c $ λ β ⟨⟨f, hf⟩⟩,
⟨set.range f, (equiv.of_injective f hf).cardinal_eq.symm⟩,
λ ⟨p, e⟩, e ▸ ⟨⟨subtype.val, λ a b, subtype.eq⟩⟩⟩
theorem out_embedding {c c' : cardinal} : c ≤ c' ↔ nonempty (c.out ↪ c'.out) :=
by { transitivity _, rw [←quotient.out_eq c, ←quotient.out_eq c'], refl }
instance : preorder cardinal.{u} :=
{ le := (≤),
le_refl := by rintros ⟨α⟩; exact ⟨embedding.refl _⟩,
le_trans := by rintros ⟨α⟩ ⟨β⟩ ⟨γ⟩ ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩; exact ⟨e₁.trans e₂⟩ }
instance : partial_order cardinal.{u} :=
{ le_antisymm := by { rintros ⟨α⟩ ⟨β⟩ ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩, exact quotient.sound (e₁.antisymm e₂) },
.. cardinal.preorder }
theorem lift_mk_le {α : Type u} {β : Type v} :
lift.{(max v w)} (#α) ≤ lift.{(max u w)} (#β) ↔ nonempty (α ↪ β) :=
⟨λ ⟨f⟩, ⟨embedding.congr equiv.ulift equiv.ulift f⟩,
λ ⟨f⟩, ⟨embedding.congr equiv.ulift.symm equiv.ulift.symm f⟩⟩
/-- A variant of `cardinal.lift_mk_le` with specialized universes.
Because Lean often can not realize it should use this specialization itself,
we provide this statement separately so you don't have to solve the specialization problem either.
-/
theorem lift_mk_le' {α : Type u} {β : Type v} :
lift.{v} (#α) ≤ lift.{u} (#β) ↔ nonempty (α ↪ β) :=
lift_mk_le.{u v 0}
theorem lift_mk_eq {α : Type u} {β : Type v} :
lift.{(max v w)} (#α) = lift.{(max u w)} (#β) ↔ nonempty (α ≃ β) :=
quotient.eq.trans
⟨λ ⟨f⟩, ⟨equiv.ulift.symm.trans $ f.trans equiv.ulift⟩,
λ ⟨f⟩, ⟨equiv.ulift.trans $ f.trans equiv.ulift.symm⟩⟩
/-- A variant of `cardinal.lift_mk_eq` with specialized universes.
Because Lean often can not realize it should use this specialization itself,
we provide this statement separately so you don't have to solve the specialization problem either.
-/
theorem lift_mk_eq' {α : Type u} {β : Type v} :
lift.{v} (#α) = lift.{u} (#β) ↔ nonempty (α ≃ β) :=
lift_mk_eq.{u v 0}
@[simp] theorem lift_le {a b : cardinal} : lift a ≤ lift b ↔ a ≤ b :=
induction_on₂ a b $ λ α β, by { rw ← lift_umax, exact lift_mk_le }
/-- `cardinal.lift` as an `order_embedding`. -/
@[simps { fully_applied := ff }] def lift_order_embedding : cardinal.{v} ↪o cardinal.{max v u} :=
order_embedding.of_map_le_iff lift (λ _ _, lift_le)
@[simp] theorem lift_inj {a b : cardinal} : lift a = lift b ↔ a = b :=
lift_order_embedding.injective.eq_iff
@[simp] theorem lift_lt {a b : cardinal} : lift a < lift b ↔ a < b :=
lift_order_embedding.lt_iff_lt
instance : has_zero cardinal.{u} := ⟨#pempty⟩
instance : inhabited cardinal.{u} := ⟨0⟩
@[simp] lemma mk_eq_zero (α : Type u) [is_empty α] : #α = 0 :=
(equiv.equiv_pempty α).cardinal_eq
@[simp] theorem lift_zero : lift 0 = 0 := mk_congr (equiv.equiv_pempty _)
lemma mk_eq_zero_iff {α : Type u} : #α = 0 ↔ is_empty α :=
⟨λ e, let ⟨h⟩ := quotient.exact e in h.is_empty, @mk_eq_zero α⟩
theorem mk_ne_zero_iff {α : Type u} : #α ≠ 0 ↔ nonempty α :=
(not_iff_not.2 mk_eq_zero_iff).trans not_is_empty_iff
@[simp] lemma mk_ne_zero (α : Type u) [nonempty α] : #α ≠ 0 := mk_ne_zero_iff.2 ‹_›
instance : has_one cardinal.{u} := ⟨⟦punit⟧⟩
instance : nontrivial cardinal.{u} := ⟨⟨1, 0, mk_ne_zero _⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma mk_eq_one (α : Type u) [unique α] : #α = 1 :=
mk_congr equiv_punit_of_unique
theorem le_one_iff_subsingleton {α : Type u} : #α ≤ 1 ↔ subsingleton α :=
⟨λ ⟨f⟩, ⟨λ a b, f.injective (subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩,
λ ⟨h⟩, ⟨⟨λ a, punit.star, λ a b _, h _ _⟩⟩⟩
instance : has_add cardinal.{u} := ⟨map₂ sum $ λ α β γ δ, equiv.sum_congr⟩
theorem add_def (α β : Type u) : #α + #β = #(α ⊕ β) := rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_sum (α : Type u) (β : Type v) :
#(α ⊕ β) = lift.{v u} (#α) + lift.{u v} (#β) :=
mk_congr ((equiv.ulift).symm.sum_congr (equiv.ulift).symm)
@[simp] theorem mk_option {α : Type u} : #(option α) = #α + 1 :=
(equiv.option_equiv_sum_punit α).cardinal_eq
@[simp] lemma mk_psum (α : Type u) (β : Type v) : #(psum α β) = lift.{v} (#α) + lift.{u} (#β) :=
(mk_congr (equiv.psum_equiv_sum α β)).trans (mk_sum α β)
instance : has_mul cardinal.{u} := ⟨map₂ prod $ λ α β γ δ, equiv.prod_congr⟩
theorem mul_def (α β : Type u) : #α * #β = #(α × β) := rfl
@[simp] lemma mk_prod (α : Type u) (β : Type v) :
#(α × β) = lift.{v u} (#α) * lift.{u v} (#β) :=
mk_congr (equiv.ulift.symm.prod_congr (equiv.ulift).symm)
protected theorem add_comm (a b : cardinal.{u}) : a + b = b + a :=
induction_on₂ a b $ λ α β, mk_congr (equiv.sum_comm α β)
protected theorem mul_comm (a b : cardinal.{u}) : a * b = b * a :=
induction_on₂ a b $ λ α β, mk_congr (equiv.prod_comm α β)
protected theorem zero_add (a : cardinal.{u}) : 0 + a = a :=
induction_on a $ λ α, mk_congr (equiv.empty_sum pempty α)
protected theorem zero_mul (a : cardinal.{u}) : 0 * a = 0 :=
induction_on a $ λ α, mk_congr (equiv.pempty_prod α)
protected theorem one_mul (a : cardinal.{u}) : 1 * a = a :=
induction_on a $ λ α, mk_congr (equiv.punit_prod α)
protected theorem left_distrib (a b c : cardinal.{u}) : a * (b + c) = a * b + a * c :=
induction_on₃ a b c $ λ α β γ, mk_congr (equiv.prod_sum_distrib α β γ)
protected theorem eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero {a b : cardinal.{u}} :
a * b = 0 → a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
begin
induction a using cardinal.induction_on with α,
induction b using cardinal.induction_on with β,
simp only [mul_def, mk_eq_zero_iff, is_empty_prod],
exact id
end
/-- The cardinal exponential. `#α ^ #β` is the cardinal of `β → α`. -/
protected def power (a b : cardinal.{u}) : cardinal.{u} :=
map₂ (λ α β : Type u, β → α) (λ α β γ δ e₁ e₂, e₂.arrow_congr e₁) a b
instance : has_pow cardinal cardinal := ⟨cardinal.power⟩
local infixr ^ := @has_pow.pow cardinal cardinal cardinal.has_pow
local infixr ` ^ℕ `:80 := @has_pow.pow cardinal ℕ monoid.has_pow
theorem power_def (α β) : #α ^ #β = #(β → α) := rfl
theorem mk_arrow (α : Type u) (β : Type v) : #(α → β) = lift.{u} (#β) ^ lift.{v} (#α) :=
mk_congr (equiv.ulift.symm.arrow_congr equiv.ulift.symm)
@[simp] theorem lift_power (a b) : lift (a ^ b) = lift a ^ lift b :=
induction_on₂ a b $ λ α β,
mk_congr (equiv.ulift.trans (equiv.ulift.arrow_congr equiv.ulift).symm)
@[simp] theorem power_zero {a : cardinal} : a ^ 0 = 1 :=
induction_on a $ assume α, (equiv.pempty_arrow_equiv_punit α).cardinal_eq
@[simp] theorem power_one {a : cardinal} : a ^ 1 = a :=
induction_on a $ assume α, (equiv.punit_arrow_equiv α).cardinal_eq
theorem power_add {a b c : cardinal} : a ^ (b + c) = a ^ b * a ^ c :=
induction_on₃ a b c $ assume α β γ, (equiv.sum_arrow_equiv_prod_arrow β γ α).cardinal_eq
instance : comm_semiring cardinal.{u} :=
{ zero := 0,
one := 1,
add := (+),
mul := (*),
zero_add := cardinal.zero_add,
add_zero := assume a, by rw [cardinal.add_comm a 0, cardinal.zero_add a],
add_assoc := λa b c, induction_on₃ a b c $ assume α β γ, mk_congr (equiv.sum_assoc α β γ),
add_comm := cardinal.add_comm,
zero_mul := cardinal.zero_mul,
mul_zero := assume a, by rw [cardinal.mul_comm a 0, cardinal.zero_mul a],
one_mul := cardinal.one_mul,
mul_one := assume a, by rw [cardinal.mul_comm a 1, cardinal.one_mul a],
mul_assoc := λa b c, induction_on₃ a b c $ assume α β γ, mk_congr (equiv.prod_assoc α β γ),
mul_comm := cardinal.mul_comm,
left_distrib := cardinal.left_distrib,
right_distrib := assume a b c, by rw [cardinal.mul_comm (a + b) c, cardinal.left_distrib c a b,
cardinal.mul_comm c a, cardinal.mul_comm c b],
npow := λ n c, c ^ n,
npow_zero' := @power_zero,
npow_succ' := λ n c, by rw [nat.cast_succ, power_add, power_one, cardinal.mul_comm] }
@[simp] theorem one_power {a : cardinal} : 1 ^ a = 1 :=
induction_on a $ assume α, (equiv.arrow_punit_equiv_punit α).cardinal_eq
@[simp] theorem mk_bool : #bool = 2 :=
mk_congr equiv.bool_equiv_punit_sum_punit
@[simp] theorem mk_Prop : #(Prop) = 2 :=
equiv.Prop_equiv_bool.cardinal_eq.trans mk_bool
@[simp] theorem zero_power {a : cardinal} : a ≠ 0 → 0 ^ a = 0 :=
induction_on a $ assume α heq, mk_eq_zero_iff.2 $ is_empty_pi.2 $
let ⟨a⟩ := mk_ne_zero_iff.1 heq in ⟨a, pempty.is_empty⟩
theorem power_ne_zero {a : cardinal} (b) : a ≠ 0 → a ^ b ≠ 0 :=
induction_on₂ a b $ λ α β h,
let ⟨a⟩ := mk_ne_zero_iff.1 h in mk_ne_zero_iff.2 ⟨λ _, a⟩
theorem mul_power {a b c : cardinal} : (a * b) ^ c = a ^ c * b ^ c :=
induction_on₃ a b c $ assume α β γ, (equiv.arrow_prod_equiv_prod_arrow α β γ).cardinal_eq
theorem power_mul {a b c : cardinal} : a ^ (b * c) = (a ^ b) ^ c :=
by rw [mul_comm b c];
from (induction_on₃ a b c $ assume α β γ, mk_congr (equiv.curry γ β α))
@[simp] lemma pow_cast_right (κ : cardinal.{u}) (n : ℕ) :
(κ ^ (↑n : cardinal.{u})) = κ ^ℕ n :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem lift_one : lift 1 = 1 :=
mk_congr (equiv.ulift.trans equiv.punit_equiv_punit)
@[simp] theorem lift_add (a b) : lift (a + b) = lift a + lift b :=
induction_on₂ a b $ λ α β,
mk_congr (equiv.ulift.trans (equiv.sum_congr equiv.ulift equiv.ulift).symm)
@[simp] theorem lift_mul (a b) : lift (a * b) = lift a * lift b :=
induction_on₂ a b $ λ α β,
mk_congr (equiv.ulift.trans (equiv.prod_congr equiv.ulift equiv.ulift).symm)
@[simp] theorem lift_bit0 (a : cardinal) : lift (bit0 a) = bit0 (lift a) :=
lift_add a a
@[simp] theorem lift_bit1 (a : cardinal) : lift (bit1 a) = bit1 (lift a) :=
by simp [bit1]
theorem lift_two : lift.{u v} 2 = 2 := by simp
@[simp] theorem mk_set {α : Type u} : #(set α) = 2 ^ #α := by simp [set, mk_arrow]
theorem lift_two_power (a) : lift (2 ^ a) = 2 ^ lift a := by simp
section order_properties
open sum
protected theorem zero_le : ∀(a : cardinal), 0 ≤ a :=
by rintro ⟨α⟩; exact ⟨embedding.of_is_empty⟩
protected theorem add_le_add : ∀{a b c d : cardinal}, a ≤ b → c ≤ d → a + c ≤ b + d :=
by rintros ⟨α⟩ ⟨β⟩ ⟨γ⟩ ⟨δ⟩ ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩; exact ⟨e₁.sum_map e₂⟩
protected theorem add_le_add_left (a) {b c : cardinal} : b ≤ c → a + b ≤ a + c :=
cardinal.add_le_add (le_refl _)
protected theorem le_iff_exists_add {a b : cardinal} : a ≤ b ↔ ∃ c, b = a + c :=
⟨induction_on₂ a b $ λ α β ⟨⟨f, hf⟩⟩,
have (α ⊕ ((range f)ᶜ : set β)) ≃ β, from
(equiv.sum_congr (equiv.of_injective f hf) (equiv.refl _)).trans $
(equiv.set.sum_compl (range f)),
⟨#↥(range f)ᶜ, mk_congr this.symm⟩,
λ ⟨c, e⟩, add_zero a ▸ e.symm ▸ cardinal.add_le_add_left _ (cardinal.zero_le _)⟩
instance : order_bot cardinal.{u} :=
{ bot := 0, bot_le := cardinal.zero_le, ..cardinal.partial_order }
instance : canonically_ordered_comm_semiring cardinal.{u} :=
{ add_le_add_left := λ a b h c, cardinal.add_le_add_left _ h,
le_iff_exists_add := @cardinal.le_iff_exists_add,
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero := @cardinal.eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero,
..cardinal.order_bot,
..cardinal.comm_semiring, ..cardinal.partial_order }
@[simp] theorem zero_lt_one : (0 : cardinal) < 1 :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (zero_le _) zero_ne_one
lemma zero_power_le (c : cardinal.{u}) : (0 : cardinal.{u}) ^ c ≤ 1 :=
by { by_cases h : c = 0, rw [h, power_zero], rw [zero_power h], apply zero_le }
theorem power_le_power_left : ∀{a b c : cardinal}, a ≠ 0 → b ≤ c → a ^ b ≤ a ^ c :=
by rintros ⟨α⟩ ⟨β⟩ ⟨γ⟩ hα ⟨e⟩; exact
let ⟨a⟩ := mk_ne_zero_iff.1 hα in
⟨@embedding.arrow_congr_left _ _ _ ⟨a⟩ e⟩
/-- **Cantor's theorem** -/
theorem cantor (a : cardinal.{u}) : a < 2 ^ a :=
begin
induction a using cardinal.induction_on with α,
rw [← mk_set],
refine ⟨⟨⟨singleton, λ a b, singleton_eq_singleton_iff.1⟩⟩, _⟩,
rintro ⟨⟨f, hf⟩⟩,
exact cantor_injective f hf
end
instance : no_top_order cardinal.{u} :=
{ no_top := λ a, ⟨_, cantor a⟩, ..cardinal.partial_order }
noncomputable instance : linear_order cardinal.{u} :=
{ le_total := by rintros ⟨α⟩ ⟨β⟩; exact embedding.total,
decidable_le := classical.dec_rel _,
.. cardinal.partial_order }
noncomputable instance : canonically_linear_ordered_add_monoid cardinal.{u} :=
{ .. (infer_instance : canonically_ordered_add_monoid cardinal.{u}),
.. cardinal.linear_order }
-- short-circuit type class inference
noncomputable instance : distrib_lattice cardinal.{u} := by apply_instance
theorem one_lt_iff_nontrivial {α : Type u} : 1 < #α ↔ nontrivial α :=
by rw [← not_le, le_one_iff_subsingleton, ← not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton, not_not]
theorem power_le_max_power_one {a b c : cardinal} (h : b ≤ c) : a ^ b ≤ max (a ^ c) 1 :=
begin
by_cases ha : a = 0,
simp [ha, zero_power_le],
exact le_trans (power_le_power_left ha h) (le_max_left _ _)
end
theorem power_le_power_right {a b c : cardinal} : a ≤ b → a ^ c ≤ b ^ c :=
induction_on₃ a b c $ assume α β γ ⟨e⟩, ⟨embedding.arrow_congr_right e⟩
end order_properties
/-- The minimum cardinal in a family of cardinals (the existence
of which is provided by `injective_min`). -/
noncomputable def min {ι} (I : nonempty ι) (f : ι → cardinal) : cardinal :=
f $ classical.some $
@embedding.min_injective _ (λ i, (f i).out) I
theorem min_eq {ι} (I) (f : ι → cardinal) : ∃ i, min I f = f i :=
⟨_, rfl⟩
theorem min_le {ι I} (f : ι → cardinal) (i) : min I f ≤ f i :=
by rw [← mk_out (min I f), ← mk_out (f i)]; exact
let ⟨g⟩ := classical.some_spec
(@embedding.min_injective _ (λ i, (f i).out) I) in
⟨g i⟩
theorem le_min {ι I} {f : ι → cardinal} {a} : a ≤ min I f ↔ ∀ i, a ≤ f i :=
⟨λ h i, le_trans h (min_le _ _),
λ h, let ⟨i, e⟩ := min_eq I f in e.symm ▸ h i⟩
protected theorem wf : @well_founded cardinal.{u} (<) :=
⟨λ a, classical.by_contradiction $ λ h,
let ι := {c :cardinal // ¬ acc (<) c},
f : ι → cardinal := subtype.val,
⟨⟨c, hc⟩, hi⟩ := @min_eq ι ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩ f in
hc (acc.intro _ (λ j ⟨_, h'⟩,
classical.by_contradiction $ λ hj, h' $
by have := min_le f ⟨j, hj⟩; rwa hi at this))⟩
instance has_wf : @has_well_founded cardinal.{u} := ⟨(<), cardinal.wf⟩
instance wo : @is_well_order cardinal.{u} (<) := ⟨cardinal.wf⟩
/-- The successor cardinal - the smallest cardinal greater than
`c`. This is not the same as `c + 1` except in the case of finite `c`. -/
noncomputable def succ (c : cardinal) : cardinal :=
@min {c' // c < c'} ⟨⟨_, cantor _⟩⟩ subtype.val
theorem lt_succ_self (c : cardinal) : c < succ c :=
by cases min_eq _ _ with s e; rw [succ, e]; exact s.2
theorem succ_le {a b : cardinal} : succ a ≤ b ↔ a < b :=
⟨lt_of_lt_of_le (lt_succ_self _), λ h,
by exact min_le _ (subtype.mk b h)⟩
@[simp] theorem lt_succ {a b : cardinal} : a < succ b ↔ a ≤ b :=
by rw [← not_le, succ_le, not_lt]
theorem add_one_le_succ (c : cardinal.{u}) : c + 1 ≤ succ c :=
begin
refine le_min.2 (λ b, _),
rcases ⟨b, c⟩ with ⟨⟨⟨β⟩, hlt⟩, ⟨γ⟩⟩,
cases hlt.le with f,
have : ¬ surjective f := λ hn, hlt.not_le (mk_le_of_surjective hn),
simp only [surjective, not_forall] at this,
rcases this with ⟨b, hb⟩,
calc #γ + 1 = #(option γ) : mk_option.symm
... ≤ #β : (f.option_elim b hb).cardinal_le
end
lemma succ_pos (c : cardinal) : 0 < succ c := by simp
lemma succ_ne_zero (c : cardinal) : succ c ≠ 0 := (succ_pos _).ne'
/-- The indexed sum of cardinals is the cardinality of the
indexed disjoint union, i.e. sigma type. -/
def sum {ι} (f : ι → cardinal) : cardinal := mk Σ i, (f i).out
theorem le_sum {ι} (f : ι → cardinal) (i) : f i ≤ sum f :=
by rw ← quotient.out_eq (f i); exact
⟨⟨λ a, ⟨i, a⟩, λ a b h, eq_of_heq $ by injection h⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem mk_sigma {ι} (f : ι → Type*) : #(Σ i, f i) = sum (λ i, #(f i)) :=
mk_congr $ equiv.sigma_congr_right $ λ i, out_mk_equiv.symm
@[simp] theorem sum_const (ι : Type u) (a : cardinal.{v}) :
sum (λ i : ι, a) = lift.{v} (#ι) * lift.{u} a :=
induction_on a $ λ α, mk_congr $
calc (Σ i : ι, quotient.out (#α)) ≃ ι × quotient.out (#α) : equiv.sigma_equiv_prod _ _
... ≃ ulift ι × ulift α : equiv.ulift.symm.prod_congr (out_mk_equiv.trans equiv.ulift.symm)
theorem sum_const' (ι : Type u) (a : cardinal.{u}) : sum (λ _:ι, a) = #ι * a := by simp
theorem sum_le_sum {ι} (f g : ι → cardinal) (H : ∀ i, f i ≤ g i) : sum f ≤ sum g :=
⟨(embedding.refl _).sigma_map $ λ i, classical.choice $
by have := H i; rwa [← quot.out_eq (f i), ← quot.out_eq (g i)] at this⟩
/-- The indexed supremum of cardinals is the smallest cardinal above
everything in the family. -/
noncomputable def sup {ι} (f : ι → cardinal) : cardinal :=
@min {c // ∀ i, f i ≤ c} ⟨⟨sum f, le_sum f⟩⟩ (λ a, a.1)
theorem le_sup {ι} (f : ι → cardinal) (i) : f i ≤ sup f :=
by dsimp [sup]; cases min_eq _ _ with c hc; rw hc; exact c.2 i
theorem sup_le {ι} {f : ι → cardinal} {a} : sup f ≤ a ↔ ∀ i, f i ≤ a :=
⟨λ h i, le_trans (le_sup _ _) h,
λ h, by dsimp [sup]; change a with (⟨a, h⟩:subtype _).1; apply min_le⟩
theorem sup_le_sup {ι} (f g : ι → cardinal) (H : ∀ i, f i ≤ g i) : sup f ≤ sup g :=
sup_le.2 $ λ i, le_trans (H i) (le_sup _ _)
theorem sup_le_sum {ι} (f : ι → cardinal) : sup f ≤ sum f :=
sup_le.2 $ le_sum _
theorem sum_le_sup {ι : Type u} (f : ι → cardinal.{u}) : sum f ≤ #ι * sup.{u u} f :=
by rw ← sum_const'; exact sum_le_sum _ _ (le_sup _)
theorem sup_eq_zero {ι} {f : ι → cardinal} [is_empty ι] : sup f = 0 :=
by { rw [← nonpos_iff_eq_zero, sup_le], exact is_empty_elim }
/-- The indexed product of cardinals is the cardinality of the Pi type
(dependent product). -/
def prod {ι : Type u} (f : ι → cardinal) : cardinal := #(Π i, (f i).out)
@[simp] theorem mk_pi {ι : Type u} (α : ι → Type v) : #(Π i, α i) = prod (λ i, #(α i)) :=
mk_congr $ equiv.Pi_congr_right $ λ i, out_mk_equiv.symm
@[simp] theorem prod_const (ι : Type u) (a : cardinal.{v}) :
prod (λ i : ι, a) = lift.{u} a ^ lift.{v} (#ι) :=
induction_on a $ λ α, mk_congr $ equiv.Pi_congr equiv.ulift.symm $
λ i, out_mk_equiv.trans equiv.ulift.symm
theorem prod_const' (ι : Type u) (a : cardinal.{u}) : prod (λ _:ι, a) = a ^ #ι :=
induction_on a $ λ α, (mk_pi _).symm
theorem prod_le_prod {ι} (f g : ι → cardinal) (H : ∀ i, f i ≤ g i) : prod f ≤ prod g :=
⟨embedding.Pi_congr_right $ λ i, classical.choice $
by have := H i; rwa [← mk_out (f i), ← mk_out (g i)] at this⟩
@[simp] theorem prod_eq_zero {ι} (f : ι → cardinal.{u}) : prod f = 0 ↔ ∃ i, f i = 0 :=
by { lift f to ι → Type u using λ _, trivial, simp only [mk_eq_zero_iff, ← mk_pi, is_empty_pi] }
theorem prod_ne_zero {ι} (f : ι → cardinal) : prod f ≠ 0 ↔ ∀ i, f i ≠ 0 :=
by simp [prod_eq_zero]
@[simp] theorem lift_prod {ι : Type u} (c : ι → cardinal.{v}) :
lift.{w} (prod c) = prod (λ i, lift.{w} (c i)) :=
begin
lift c to ι → Type v using λ _, trivial,
simp only [← mk_pi, ← mk_ulift],
exact mk_congr (equiv.ulift.trans $ equiv.Pi_congr_right $ λ i, equiv.ulift.symm)
end
@[simp] theorem lift_min {ι I} (f : ι → cardinal) : lift (min I f) = min I (lift ∘ f) :=
le_antisymm (le_min.2 $ λ a, lift_le.2 $ min_le _ a) $
let ⟨i, e⟩ := min_eq I (lift ∘ f) in
by rw e; exact lift_le.2 (le_min.2 $ λ j, lift_le.1 $
by have := min_le (lift ∘ f) j; rwa e at this)
theorem lift_down {a : cardinal.{u}} {b : cardinal.{max u v}} :
b ≤ lift a → ∃ a', lift a' = b :=
induction_on₂ a b $ λ α β,
by rw [← lift_id (#β), ← lift_umax, ← lift_umax.{u v}, lift_mk_le]; exact
λ ⟨f⟩, ⟨#(set.range f), eq.symm $ lift_mk_eq.2
⟨embedding.equiv_of_surjective
(embedding.cod_restrict _ f set.mem_range_self)
$ λ ⟨a, ⟨b, e⟩⟩, ⟨b, subtype.eq e⟩⟩⟩
theorem le_lift_iff {a : cardinal.{u}} {b : cardinal.{max u v}} :
b ≤ lift a ↔ ∃ a', lift a' = b ∧ a' ≤ a :=
⟨λ h, let ⟨a', e⟩ := lift_down h in ⟨a', e, lift_le.1 $ e.symm ▸ h⟩,
λ ⟨a', e, h⟩, e ▸ lift_le.2 h⟩
theorem lt_lift_iff {a : cardinal.{u}} {b : cardinal.{max u v}} :
b < lift a ↔ ∃ a', lift a' = b ∧ a' < a :=
⟨λ h, let ⟨a', e⟩ := lift_down (le_of_lt h) in
⟨a', e, lift_lt.1 $ e.symm ▸ h⟩,
λ ⟨a', e, h⟩, e ▸ lift_lt.2 h⟩
@[simp] theorem lift_succ (a) : lift (succ a) = succ (lift a) :=
le_antisymm
(le_of_not_gt $ λ h, begin
rcases lt_lift_iff.1 h with ⟨b, e, h⟩,
rw [lt_succ, ← lift_le, e] at h,
exact not_lt_of_le h (lt_succ_self _)
end)
(succ_le.2 $ lift_lt.2 $ lt_succ_self _)
@[simp] theorem lift_max {a : cardinal.{u}} {b : cardinal.{v}} :
lift.{(max v w)} a = lift.{(max u w)} b ↔ lift.{v} a = lift.{u} b :=
calc lift.{(max v w)} a = lift.{(max u w)} b
↔ lift.{w} (lift.{v} a) = lift.{w} (lift.{u} b) : by simp
... ↔ lift.{v} a = lift.{u} b : lift_inj
protected lemma le_sup_iff {ι : Type v} {f : ι → cardinal.{max v w}} {c : cardinal} :
(c ≤ sup f) ↔ (∀ b, (∀ i, f i ≤ b) → c ≤ b) :=
⟨λ h b hb, le_trans h (sup_le.mpr hb), λ h, h _ $ λ i, le_sup f i⟩
/-- The lift of a supremum is the supremum of the lifts. -/
lemma lift_sup {ι : Type v} (f : ι → cardinal.{max v w}) :
lift.{u} (sup.{v w} f) = sup.{v (max u w)} (λ i : ι, lift.{u} (f i)) :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ rw [cardinal.le_sup_iff], intros c hc, by_contra h,
obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := cardinal.lift_down (not_le.mp h).le,
simp only [lift_le, sup_le] at h hc,
exact h hc },
{ simp only [cardinal.sup_le, lift_le, le_sup, implies_true_iff] }
end
/-- To prove that the lift of a supremum is bounded by some cardinal `t`,
it suffices to show that the lift of each cardinal is bounded by `t`. -/
lemma lift_sup_le {ι : Type v} (f : ι → cardinal.{max v w})
(t : cardinal.{max u v w}) (w : ∀ i, lift.{u} (f i) ≤ t) :
lift.{u} (sup f) ≤ t :=
by { rw lift_sup, exact sup_le.mpr w, }
@[simp] lemma lift_sup_le_iff {ι : Type v} (f : ι → cardinal.{max v w}) (t : cardinal.{max u v w}) :
lift.{u} (sup f) ≤ t ↔ ∀ i, lift.{u} (f i) ≤ t :=
⟨λ h i, (lift_le.mpr (le_sup f i)).trans h,
λ h, lift_sup_le f t h⟩
universes v' w'
/--
To prove an inequality between the lifts to a common universe of two different supremums,
it suffices to show that the lift of each cardinal from the smaller supremum
if bounded by the lift of some cardinal from the larger supremum.
-/
lemma lift_sup_le_lift_sup
{ι : Type v} {ι' : Type v'} (f : ι → cardinal.{max v w}) (f' : ι' → cardinal.{max v' w'})
(g : ι → ι') (h : ∀ i, lift.{(max v' w')} (f i) ≤ lift.{(max v w)} (f' (g i))) :
lift.{(max v' w')} (sup f) ≤ lift.{(max v w)} (sup f') :=
begin
apply lift_sup_le.{(max v' w')} f,
intro i,
apply le_trans (h i),
simp only [lift_le],
apply le_sup,
end
/-- A variant of `lift_sup_le_lift_sup` with universes specialized via `w = v` and `w' = v'`.
This is sometimes necessary to avoid universe unification issues. -/
lemma lift_sup_le_lift_sup'
{ι : Type v} {ι' : Type v'} (f : ι → cardinal.{v}) (f' : ι' → cardinal.{v'})
(g : ι → ι') (h : ∀ i, lift.{v'} (f i) ≤ lift.{v} (f' (g i))) :
lift.{v'} (sup.{v v} f) ≤ lift.{v} (sup.{v' v'} f') :=
lift_sup_le_lift_sup f f' g h
/-- `ω` is the smallest infinite cardinal, also known as ℵ₀. -/
def omega : cardinal.{u} := lift (#ℕ)
localized "notation `ω` := cardinal.omega" in cardinal
lemma mk_nat : #ℕ = ω := (lift_id _).symm
theorem omega_ne_zero : ω ≠ 0 := mk_ne_zero _
theorem omega_pos : 0 < ω :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.2 omega_ne_zero
@[simp] theorem lift_omega : lift ω = ω := lift_lift _
@[simp] theorem omega_le_lift {c : cardinal.{u}} : ω ≤ lift.{v} c ↔ ω ≤ c :=
by rw [← lift_omega, lift_le]
@[simp] theorem lift_le_omega {c : cardinal.{u}} : lift.{v} c ≤ ω ↔ c ≤ ω :=
by rw [← lift_omega, lift_le]
/- properties about the cast from nat -/
@[simp] theorem mk_fin : ∀ (n : ℕ), #(fin n) = n
| 0 := mk_eq_zero _
| (n+1) := by rw [nat.cast_succ, ← mk_fin]; exact
quotient.sound (fintype.card_eq.1 $ by simp)
@[simp] theorem lift_nat_cast (n : ℕ) : lift n = n :=
by induction n; simp *
lemma lift_eq_nat_iff {a : cardinal.{u}} {n : ℕ} : lift.{v} a = n ↔ a = n :=
by rw [← lift_nat_cast.{u v} n, lift_inj]
lemma nat_eq_lift_eq_iff {n : ℕ} {a : cardinal.{u}} :
(n : cardinal) = lift.{v} a ↔ (n : cardinal) = a :=
by rw [← lift_nat_cast.{u v} n, lift_inj]
theorem lift_mk_fin (n : ℕ) : lift (#(fin n)) = n := by simp
theorem fintype_card (α : Type u) [fintype α] : #α = fintype.card α :=
by rw [← lift_mk_fin.{u}, ← lift_id (#α), lift_mk_eq.{u 0 u}];
exact fintype.card_eq.1 (by simp)
theorem card_le_of_finset {α} (s : finset α) :
(s.card : cardinal) ≤ #α :=
begin
rw (_ : (s.card : cardinal) = #s),
{ exact ⟨function.embedding.subtype _⟩ },
rw [cardinal.fintype_card, fintype.card_coe]
end
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem nat_cast_pow {m n : ℕ} : (↑(pow m n) : cardinal) = m ^ n :=
by induction n; simp [pow_succ', power_add, *]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem nat_cast_le {m n : ℕ} : (m : cardinal) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n :=
by rw [← lift_mk_fin, ← lift_mk_fin, lift_le]; exact
⟨λ ⟨⟨f, hf⟩⟩, by simpa only [fintype.card_fin] using fintype.card_le_of_injective f hf,
λ h, ⟨(fin.cast_le h).to_embedding⟩⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem nat_cast_lt {m n : ℕ} : (m : cardinal) < n ↔ m < n :=
by simp [lt_iff_le_not_le, -not_le]
instance : char_zero cardinal := ⟨strict_mono.injective $ λ m n, nat_cast_lt.2⟩
theorem nat_cast_inj {m n : ℕ} : (m : cardinal) = n ↔ m = n := nat.cast_inj
lemma nat_cast_injective : injective (coe : ℕ → cardinal) :=
nat.cast_injective
@[simp, norm_cast, priority 900] theorem nat_succ (n : ℕ) : (n.succ : cardinal) = succ n :=
le_antisymm (add_one_le_succ _) (succ_le.2 $ nat_cast_lt.2 $ nat.lt_succ_self _)
@[simp] theorem succ_zero : succ 0 = 1 :=
by norm_cast
theorem card_le_of {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} (H : ∀ s : finset α, s.card ≤ n) :
# α ≤ n :=
begin
refine lt_succ.1 (lt_of_not_ge $ λ hn, _),
rw [← cardinal.nat_succ, ← cardinal.lift_mk_fin n.succ] at hn,
cases hn with f,
refine not_lt_of_le (H $ finset.univ.map f) _,
rw [finset.card_map, ← fintype.card, fintype.card_ulift, fintype.card_fin],
exact n.lt_succ_self
end
theorem cantor' (a) {b : cardinal} (hb : 1 < b) : a < b ^ a :=
by rw [← succ_le, (by norm_cast : succ 1 = 2)] at hb;
exact lt_of_lt_of_le (cantor _) (power_le_power_right hb)
theorem one_le_iff_pos {c : cardinal} : 1 ≤ c ↔ 0 < c :=
by rw [← succ_zero, succ_le]
theorem one_le_iff_ne_zero {c : cardinal} : 1 ≤ c ↔ c ≠ 0 :=
by rw [one_le_iff_pos, pos_iff_ne_zero]
theorem nat_lt_omega (n : ℕ) : (n : cardinal.{u}) < ω :=
succ_le.1 $ by rw [← nat_succ, ← lift_mk_fin, omega, lift_mk_le.{0 0 u}]; exact
⟨⟨coe, λ a b, fin.ext⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem one_lt_omega : 1 < ω :=
by simpa using nat_lt_omega 1
theorem lt_omega {c : cardinal.{u}} : c < ω ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, c = n :=
⟨λ h, begin
rcases lt_lift_iff.1 h with ⟨c, rfl, h'⟩,
rcases le_mk_iff_exists_set.1 h'.1 with ⟨S, rfl⟩,
suffices : finite S,
{ cases this, resetI,
existsi fintype.card S,
rw [← lift_nat_cast.{0 u}, lift_inj, fintype_card S] },
contrapose! h',
haveI := infinite.to_subtype h',
exact ⟨infinite.nat_embedding S⟩
end, λ ⟨n, e⟩, e.symm ▸ nat_lt_omega _⟩
theorem omega_le {c : cardinal.{u}} : ω ≤ c ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, (n:cardinal) ≤ c :=
⟨λ h n, le_trans (le_of_lt (nat_lt_omega _)) h,
λ h, le_of_not_lt $ λ hn, begin
rcases lt_omega.1 hn with ⟨n, rfl⟩,
exact not_le_of_lt (nat.lt_succ_self _) (nat_cast_le.1 (h (n+1)))
end⟩
theorem lt_omega_iff_fintype {α : Type u} : #α < ω ↔ nonempty (fintype α) :=
lt_omega.trans ⟨λ ⟨n, e⟩, begin
rw [← lift_mk_fin n] at e,
cases quotient.exact e with f,
exact ⟨fintype.of_equiv _ f.symm⟩
end, λ ⟨_⟩, by exactI ⟨_, fintype_card _⟩⟩
theorem lt_omega_iff_finite {α} {S : set α} : #S < ω ↔ finite S :=
lt_omega_iff_fintype.trans finite_def.symm
instance can_lift_cardinal_nat : can_lift cardinal ℕ :=
⟨ coe, λ x, x < ω, λ x hx, let ⟨n, hn⟩ := lt_omega.mp hx in ⟨n, hn.symm⟩⟩
theorem add_lt_omega {a b : cardinal} (ha : a < ω) (hb : b < ω) : a + b < ω :=
match a, b, lt_omega.1 ha, lt_omega.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ := by rw [← nat.cast_add]; apply nat_lt_omega
end
lemma add_lt_omega_iff {a b : cardinal} : a + b < ω ↔ a < ω ∧ b < ω :=
⟨λ h, ⟨lt_of_le_of_lt (self_le_add_right _ _) h, lt_of_le_of_lt (self_le_add_left _ _) h⟩,
λ⟨h1, h2⟩, add_lt_omega h1 h2⟩
lemma omega_le_add_iff {a b : cardinal} : ω ≤ a + b ↔ ω ≤ a ∨ ω ≤ b :=
by simp only [← not_lt, add_lt_omega_iff, not_and_distrib]
theorem mul_lt_omega {a b : cardinal} (ha : a < ω) (hb : b < ω) : a * b < ω :=
match a, b, lt_omega.1 ha, lt_omega.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ := by rw [← nat.cast_mul]; apply nat_lt_omega
end
lemma mul_lt_omega_iff {a b : cardinal} : a * b < ω ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 ∨ a < ω ∧ b < ω :=
begin
split,
{ intro h, by_cases ha : a = 0, { left, exact ha },
right, by_cases hb : b = 0, { left, exact hb },
right, rw [← ne, ← one_le_iff_ne_zero] at ha hb, split,
{ rw [← mul_one a],
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (mul_le_mul' (le_refl a) hb) h },
{ rw [← one_mul b],
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (mul_le_mul' ha (le_refl b)) h }},
rintro (rfl|rfl|⟨ha,hb⟩); simp only [*, mul_lt_omega, omega_pos, zero_mul, mul_zero]
end
lemma mul_lt_omega_iff_of_ne_zero {a b : cardinal} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a * b < ω ↔ a < ω ∧ b < ω :=
by simp [mul_lt_omega_iff, ha, hb]
theorem power_lt_omega {a b : cardinal} (ha : a < ω) (hb : b < ω) : a ^ b < ω :=
match a, b, lt_omega.1 ha, lt_omega.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ := by rw [← nat_cast_pow]; apply nat_lt_omega
end
lemma eq_one_iff_unique {α : Type*} :
#α = 1 ↔ subsingleton α ∧ nonempty α :=
calc #α = 1 ↔ #α ≤ 1 ∧ ¬#α < 1 : eq_iff_le_not_lt
... ↔ subsingleton α ∧ nonempty α :
begin
apply and_congr le_one_iff_subsingleton,
push_neg,
rw [one_le_iff_ne_zero, mk_ne_zero_iff]
end
theorem infinite_iff {α : Type u} : infinite α ↔ ω ≤ #α :=
by rw [←not_lt, lt_omega_iff_fintype, not_nonempty_iff, is_empty_fintype]
@[simp] lemma omega_le_mk (α : Type u) [infinite α] : ω ≤ #α := infinite_iff.1 ‹_›
lemma encodable_iff {α : Type u} : nonempty (encodable α) ↔ #α ≤ ω :=
⟨λ ⟨h⟩, ⟨(@encodable.encode' α h).trans equiv.ulift.symm.to_embedding⟩,
λ ⟨h⟩, ⟨encodable.of_inj _ (h.trans equiv.ulift.to_embedding).injective⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma mk_le_omega [encodable α] : #α ≤ ω := encodable_iff.1 ⟨‹_›⟩
lemma denumerable_iff {α : Type u} : nonempty (denumerable α) ↔ #α = ω :=
⟨λ ⟨h⟩, mk_congr ((@denumerable.eqv α h).trans equiv.ulift.symm),
λ h, by { cases quotient.exact h with f, exact ⟨denumerable.mk' $ f.trans equiv.ulift⟩ }⟩
@[simp] lemma mk_denumerable (α : Type u) [denumerable α] : #α = ω :=
denumerable_iff.1 ⟨‹_›⟩
@[simp] lemma mk_set_le_omega (s : set α) : #s ≤ ω ↔ countable s :=
begin
rw [countable_iff_exists_injective], split,
{ rintro ⟨f'⟩, cases embedding.trans f' equiv.ulift.to_embedding with f hf, exact ⟨f, hf⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨f, hf⟩, exact ⟨embedding.trans ⟨f, hf⟩ equiv.ulift.symm.to_embedding⟩ }
end
@[simp] lemma omega_add_omega : ω + ω = ω := mk_denumerable _
lemma omega_mul_omega : ω * ω = ω := mk_denumerable _
@[simp] lemma add_le_omega {c₁ c₂ : cardinal} : c₁ + c₂ ≤ ω ↔ c₁ ≤ ω ∧ c₂ ≤ ω :=
⟨λ h, ⟨le_self_add.trans h, le_add_self.trans h⟩, λ h, omega_add_omega ▸ add_le_add h.1 h.2⟩
/-- This function sends finite cardinals to the corresponding natural, and infinite cardinals
to 0. -/
noncomputable def to_nat : zero_hom cardinal ℕ :=
⟨λ c, if h : c < omega.{v} then classical.some (lt_omega.1 h) else 0,
begin
have h : 0 < ω := nat_lt_omega 0,
rw [dif_pos h, ← cardinal.nat_cast_inj, ← classical.some_spec (lt_omega.1 h), nat.cast_zero],
end⟩
lemma to_nat_apply_of_lt_omega {c : cardinal} (h : c < ω) :
c.to_nat = classical.some (lt_omega.1 h) :=
dif_pos h
@[simp]
lemma to_nat_apply_of_omega_le {c : cardinal} (h : ω ≤ c) :
c.to_nat = 0 :=
dif_neg (not_lt_of_le h)
@[simp]
lemma cast_to_nat_of_lt_omega {c : cardinal} (h : c < ω) :
↑c.to_nat = c :=
by rw [to_nat_apply_of_lt_omega h, ← classical.some_spec (lt_omega.1 h)]
@[simp]
lemma cast_to_nat_of_omega_le {c : cardinal} (h : ω ≤ c) :
↑c.to_nat = (0 : cardinal) :=
by rw [to_nat_apply_of_omega_le h, nat.cast_zero]
@[simp]
lemma to_nat_cast (n : ℕ) : cardinal.to_nat n = n :=
begin
rw [to_nat_apply_of_lt_omega (nat_lt_omega n), ← nat_cast_inj],
exact (classical.some_spec (lt_omega.1 (nat_lt_omega n))).symm,
end
/-- `to_nat` has a right-inverse: coercion. -/
lemma to_nat_right_inverse : function.right_inverse (coe : ℕ → cardinal) to_nat := to_nat_cast
lemma to_nat_surjective : surjective to_nat := to_nat_right_inverse.surjective
@[simp]
lemma mk_to_nat_of_infinite [h : infinite α] : (#α).to_nat = 0 :=
dif_neg (not_lt_of_le (infinite_iff.1 h))
@[simp]
lemma mk_to_nat_eq_card [fintype α] : (#α).to_nat = fintype.card α :=
by simp [fintype_card]
@[simp]
lemma zero_to_nat : to_nat 0 = 0 :=
by rw [← to_nat_cast 0, nat.cast_zero]
@[simp]
lemma one_to_nat : to_nat 1 = 1 :=
by rw [← to_nat_cast 1, nat.cast_one]
@[simp] lemma to_nat_eq_one {c : cardinal} : to_nat c = 1 ↔ c = 1 :=
⟨λ h, (cast_to_nat_of_lt_omega (lt_of_not_ge (one_ne_zero ∘ h.symm.trans ∘
to_nat_apply_of_omega_le))).symm.trans ((congr_arg coe h).trans nat.cast_one),
λ h, (congr_arg to_nat h).trans one_to_nat⟩
lemma to_nat_eq_one_iff_unique {α : Type*} : (#α).to_nat = 1 ↔ subsingleton α ∧ nonempty α :=
to_nat_eq_one.trans eq_one_iff_unique
@[simp] lemma to_nat_lift (c : cardinal.{v}) : (lift.{u v} c).to_nat = c.to_nat :=
begin
apply nat_cast_injective,
cases lt_or_ge c ω with hc hc,
{ rw [cast_to_nat_of_lt_omega, ←lift_nat_cast, cast_to_nat_of_lt_omega hc],
rwa [←lift_omega, lift_lt] },
{ rw [cast_to_nat_of_omega_le, ←lift_nat_cast, cast_to_nat_of_omega_le hc, lift_zero],
rwa [←lift_omega, lift_le] },
end
lemma to_nat_congr {β : Type v} (e : α ≃ β) : (#α).to_nat = (#β).to_nat :=
by rw [←to_nat_lift, lift_mk_eq.mpr ⟨e⟩, to_nat_lift]
@[simp] lemma to_nat_mul (x y : cardinal) : (x * y).to_nat = x.to_nat * y.to_nat :=
begin
by_cases hx1 : x = 0,
{ rw [comm_semiring.mul_comm, hx1, mul_zero, zero_to_nat, nat.zero_mul] },
by_cases hy1 : y = 0,
{ rw [hy1, zero_to_nat, mul_zero, mul_zero, zero_to_nat] },
refine nat_cast_injective (eq.trans _ (nat.cast_mul _ _).symm),
cases lt_or_ge x ω with hx2 hx2,
{ cases lt_or_ge y ω with hy2 hy2,
{ rw [cast_to_nat_of_lt_omega, cast_to_nat_of_lt_omega hx2, cast_to_nat_of_lt_omega hy2],
exact mul_lt_omega hx2 hy2 },
{ rw [cast_to_nat_of_omega_le hy2, mul_zero, cast_to_nat_of_omega_le],
exact not_lt.mp (mt (mul_lt_omega_iff_of_ne_zero hx1 hy1).mp (λ h, not_lt.mpr hy2 h.2)) } },
{ rw [cast_to_nat_of_omega_le hx2, zero_mul, cast_to_nat_of_omega_le],
exact not_lt.mp (mt (mul_lt_omega_iff_of_ne_zero hx1 hy1).mp (λ h, not_lt.mpr hx2 h.1)) },
end
@[simp] lemma to_nat_add_of_lt_omega {a : cardinal.{u}} {b : cardinal.{v}}
(ha : a < ω) (hb : b < ω) : ((lift.{v u} a) + (lift.{u v} b)).to_nat = a.to_nat + b.to_nat :=
begin
apply cardinal.nat_cast_injective,
replace ha : (lift.{v u} a) < ω := by { rw [← lift_omega], exact lift_lt.2 ha },
replace hb : (lift.{u v} b) < ω := by { rw [← lift_omega], exact lift_lt.2 hb },
rw [nat.cast_add, ← to_nat_lift.{v u} a, ← to_nat_lift.{u v} b, cast_to_nat_of_lt_omega ha,
cast_to_nat_of_lt_omega hb, cast_to_nat_of_lt_omega (add_lt_omega ha hb)]
end
/-- This function sends finite cardinals to the corresponding natural, and infinite cardinals
to `⊤`. -/
noncomputable def to_enat : cardinal →+ enat :=
{ to_fun := λ c, if c < omega.{v} then c.to_nat else ⊤,
map_zero' := by simp [if_pos (lt_trans zero_lt_one one_lt_omega)],
map_add' := λ x y, begin
by_cases hx : x < ω,
{ obtain ⟨x0, rfl⟩ := lt_omega.1 hx,
by_cases hy : y < ω,
{ obtain ⟨y0, rfl⟩ := lt_omega.1 hy,
simp only [add_lt_omega hx hy, hx, hy, to_nat_cast, if_true],
rw [← nat.cast_add, to_nat_cast, nat.cast_add] },
{ rw [if_neg hy, if_neg, enat.add_top],
contrapose! hy,
apply lt_of_le_of_lt le_add_self hy } },
{ rw [if_neg hx, if_neg, enat.top_add],
contrapose! hx,
apply lt_of_le_of_lt le_self_add hx },
end }
@[simp]
lemma to_enat_apply_of_lt_omega {c : cardinal} (h : c < ω) :
c.to_enat = c.to_nat :=
if_pos h
@[simp]
lemma to_enat_apply_of_omega_le {c : cardinal} (h : ω ≤ c) :
c.to_enat = ⊤ :=
if_neg (not_lt_of_le h)
@[simp]
lemma to_enat_cast (n : ℕ) : cardinal.to_enat n = n :=
by rw [to_enat_apply_of_lt_omega (nat_lt_omega n), to_nat_cast]
@[simp]
lemma mk_to_enat_of_infinite [h : infinite α] : (#α).to_enat = ⊤ :=
to_enat_apply_of_omega_le (infinite_iff.1 h)
lemma to_enat_surjective : surjective to_enat :=
begin
intro x,
exact enat.cases_on x ⟨ω, to_enat_apply_of_omega_le (le_refl ω)⟩
(λ n, ⟨n, to_enat_cast n⟩),
end
@[simp]
lemma mk_to_enat_eq_coe_card [fintype α] : (#α).to_enat = fintype.card α :=
by simp [fintype_card]
lemma mk_int : #ℤ = ω := mk_denumerable ℤ
lemma mk_pnat : #ℕ+ = ω := mk_denumerable ℕ+
lemma two_le_iff : (2 : cardinal) ≤ #α ↔ ∃x y : α, x ≠ y :=
begin
split,
{ rintro ⟨f⟩, refine ⟨f $ sum.inl ⟨⟩, f $ sum.inr ⟨⟩, _⟩, intro h, cases f.2 h },
{ rintro ⟨x, y, h⟩, by_contra h',
rw [not_le, ←nat.cast_two, nat_succ, lt_succ, nat.cast_one, le_one_iff_subsingleton] at h',
apply h, exactI subsingleton.elim _ _ }
end
lemma two_le_iff' (x : α) : (2 : cardinal) ≤ #α ↔ ∃y : α, x ≠ y :=
begin
rw [two_le_iff],
split,
{ rintro ⟨y, z, h⟩, refine classical.by_cases (λ(h' : x = y), _) (λ h', ⟨y, h'⟩),
rw [←h'] at h, exact ⟨z, h⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨y, h⟩, exact ⟨x, y, h⟩ }
end
/-- **König's theorem** -/
theorem sum_lt_prod {ι} (f g : ι → cardinal) (H : ∀ i, f i < g i) : sum f < prod g :=
lt_of_not_ge $ λ ⟨F⟩, begin
haveI : inhabited (Π (i : ι), (g i).out),
{ refine ⟨λ i, classical.choice $ mk_ne_zero_iff.1 _⟩,
rw mk_out,
exact (H i).ne_bot },
let G := inv_fun F,
have sG : surjective G := inv_fun_surjective F.2,
choose C hc using show ∀ i, ∃ b, ∀ a, G ⟨i, a⟩ i ≠ b,
{ assume i,
simp only [- not_exists, not_exists.symm, not_forall.symm],
refine λ h, not_le_of_lt (H i) _,
rw [← mk_out (f i), ← mk_out (g i)],
exact ⟨embedding.of_surjective _ h⟩ },
exact (let ⟨⟨i, a⟩, h⟩ := sG C in hc i a (congr_fun h _))
end
@[simp] theorem mk_empty : #empty = 0 := mk_eq_zero _
@[simp] theorem mk_pempty : #pempty = 0 := mk_eq_zero _
@[simp] theorem mk_punit : #punit = 1 := mk_eq_one punit
theorem mk_unit : #unit = 1 := mk_punit
@[simp] theorem mk_singleton {α : Type u} (x : α) : #({x} : set α) = 1 :=
mk_eq_one _
@[simp] theorem mk_plift_true : #(plift true) = 1 := mk_eq_one _
@[simp] theorem mk_plift_false : #(plift false) = 0 := mk_eq_zero _
@[simp] theorem mk_vector (α : Type u) (n : ℕ) : #(vector α n) = (#α) ^ℕ n :=
(mk_congr (equiv.vector_equiv_fin α n)).trans $ by simp
theorem mk_list_eq_sum_pow (α : Type u) : #(list α) = sum (λ n : ℕ, (#α) ^ℕ n) :=
calc #(list α) = #(Σ n, vector α n) : mk_congr (equiv.sigma_preimage_equiv list.length).symm
... = sum (λ n : ℕ, (#α) ^ℕ n) : by simp
theorem mk_quot_le {α : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} : #(quot r) ≤ #α :=
mk_le_of_surjective quot.exists_rep
theorem mk_quotient_le {α : Type u} {s : setoid α} : #(quotient s) ≤ #α :=
mk_quot_le
theorem mk_subtype_le {α : Type u} (p : α → Prop) : #(subtype p) ≤ #α :=
⟨embedding.subtype p⟩
theorem mk_subtype_le_of_subset {α : Type u} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ ⦃x⦄, p x → q x) :
#(subtype p) ≤ #(subtype q) :=
⟨embedding.subtype_map (embedding.refl α) h⟩
@[simp] theorem mk_emptyc (α : Type u) : #(∅ : set α) = 0 := mk_eq_zero _
lemma mk_emptyc_iff {α : Type u} {s : set α} : #s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ :=
begin
split,
{ intro h,
rw mk_eq_zero_iff at h,
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 (λ x hx, h.elim' ⟨x, hx⟩) },
{ rintro rfl, exact mk_emptyc _ }
end
@[simp] theorem mk_univ {α : Type u} : #(@univ α) = #α :=
mk_congr (equiv.set.univ α)
theorem mk_image_le {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} {s : set α} : #(f '' s) ≤ #s :=
mk_le_of_surjective surjective_onto_image
theorem mk_image_le_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} {s : set α} :
lift.{u} (#(f '' s)) ≤ lift.{v} (#s) :=
lift_mk_le.{v u 0}.mpr ⟨embedding.of_surjective _ surjective_onto_image⟩
theorem mk_range_le {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} : #(range f) ≤ #α :=
mk_le_of_surjective surjective_onto_range
theorem mk_range_le_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} :
lift.{u} (#(range f)) ≤ lift.{v} (#α) :=
lift_mk_le.{v u 0}.mpr ⟨embedding.of_surjective _ surjective_onto_range⟩
lemma mk_range_eq (f : α → β) (h : injective f) : #(range f) = #α :=
mk_congr ((equiv.of_injective f h).symm)
lemma mk_range_eq_of_injective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : injective f) :
lift.{u} (#(range f)) = lift.{v} (#α) :=
begin
have := (@lift_mk_eq.{v u max u v} (range f) α).2 ⟨(equiv.of_injective f hf).symm⟩,
simp only [lift_umax.{u v}, lift_umax.{v u}] at this,
exact this
end
lemma mk_range_eq_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : injective f) :
lift.{(max u w)} (# (range f)) = lift.{(max v w)} (# α) :=
lift_mk_eq.mpr ⟨(equiv.of_injective f hf).symm⟩
theorem mk_image_eq {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} {s : set α} (hf : injective f) :
#(f '' s) = #s :=
mk_congr ((equiv.set.image f s hf).symm)
theorem mk_Union_le_sum_mk {α ι : Type u} {f : ι → set α} : #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ sum (λ i, #(f i)) :=
calc #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #(Σ i, f i) : mk_le_of_surjective (set.sigma_to_Union_surjective f)
... = sum (λ i, #(f i)) : mk_sigma _
theorem mk_Union_eq_sum_mk {α ι : Type u} {f : ι → set α} (h : ∀i j, i ≠ j → disjoint (f i) (f j)) :
#(⋃ i, f i) = sum (λ i, #(f i)) :=
calc #(⋃ i, f i) = #(Σ i, f i) : mk_congr (set.Union_eq_sigma_of_disjoint h)
... = sum (λi, #(f i)) : mk_sigma _
lemma mk_Union_le {α ι : Type u} (f : ι → set α) :
#(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #ι * cardinal.sup.{u u} (λ i, #(f i)) :=
le_trans mk_Union_le_sum_mk (sum_le_sup _)
lemma mk_sUnion_le {α : Type u} (A : set (set α)) :
#(⋃₀ A) ≤ #A * cardinal.sup.{u u} (λ s : A, #s) :=
by { rw [sUnion_eq_Union], apply mk_Union_le }
lemma mk_bUnion_le {ι α : Type u} (A : ι → set α) (s : set ι) :
#(⋃(x ∈ s), A x) ≤ #s * cardinal.sup.{u u} (λ x : s, #(A x.1)) :=
by { rw [bUnion_eq_Union], apply mk_Union_le }
@[simp] lemma finset_card {α : Type u} {s : finset α} : ↑(finset.card s) = #s :=
by rw [fintype_card, nat_cast_inj, fintype.card_coe]
lemma finset_card_lt_omega (s : finset α) : #(↑s : set α) < ω :=
by { rw [lt_omega_iff_fintype], exact ⟨finset.subtype.fintype s⟩ }
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff_finset {α} {s : set α} {n : ℕ} :
#s = n ↔ ∃ t : finset α, (t : set α) = s ∧ t.card = n :=
begin
split,
{ intro h,
have : # s < omega, by { rw h, exact nat_lt_omega n },
refine ⟨(lt_omega_iff_finite.1 this).to_finset, finite.coe_to_finset _, nat_cast_inj.1 _⟩,
rwa [finset_card, finite.coe_sort_to_finset] },
{ rintro ⟨t, rfl, rfl⟩,
exact finset_card.symm }
end
theorem mk_union_add_mk_inter {α : Type u} {S T : set α} :
#(S ∪ T : set α) + #(S ∩ T : set α) = #S + #T :=
quot.sound ⟨equiv.set.union_sum_inter S T⟩
/-- The cardinality of a union is at most the sum of the cardinalities
of the two sets. -/
lemma mk_union_le {α : Type u} (S T : set α) : #(S ∪ T : set α) ≤ #S + #T :=
@mk_union_add_mk_inter α S T ▸ self_le_add_right (#(S ∪ T : set α)) (#(S ∩ T : set α))
theorem mk_union_of_disjoint {α : Type u} {S T : set α} (H : disjoint S T) :
#(S ∪ T : set α) = #S + #T :=
quot.sound ⟨equiv.set.union H⟩
theorem mk_insert {α : Type u} {s : set α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) :
#(insert a s : set α) = #s + 1 :=
by { rw [← union_singleton, mk_union_of_disjoint, mk_singleton], simpa }
lemma mk_sum_compl {α} (s : set α) : #s + #(sᶜ : set α) = #α :=
mk_congr (equiv.set.sum_compl s)
lemma mk_le_mk_of_subset {α} {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : #s ≤ #t :=
⟨set.embedding_of_subset s t h⟩
lemma mk_subtype_mono {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀x, p x → q x) : #{x // p x} ≤ #{x // q x} :=
⟨embedding_of_subset _ _ h⟩
lemma mk_set_le (s : set α) : #s ≤ #α :=
mk_subtype_le s
lemma mk_union_le_omega {α} {P Q : set α} : #((P ∪ Q : set α)) ≤ ω ↔ #P ≤ ω ∧ #Q ≤ ω :=
by simp
lemma mk_image_eq_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : set α) (h : injective f) :
lift.{u} (#(f '' s)) = lift.{v} (#s) :=
lift_mk_eq.{v u 0}.mpr ⟨(equiv.set.image f s h).symm⟩
lemma mk_image_eq_of_inj_on_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : set α)
(h : inj_on f s) : lift.{u} (#(f '' s)) = lift.{v} (#s) :=
lift_mk_eq.{v u 0}.mpr ⟨(equiv.set.image_of_inj_on f s h).symm⟩
lemma mk_image_eq_of_inj_on {α β : Type u} (f : α → β) (s : set α) (h : inj_on f s) :
#(f '' s) = #s :=
mk_congr ((equiv.set.image_of_inj_on f s h).symm)
lemma mk_subtype_of_equiv {α β : Type u} (p : β → Prop) (e : α ≃ β) :
#{a : α // p (e a)} = #{b : β // p b} :=
mk_congr (equiv.subtype_equiv_of_subtype e)
lemma mk_sep (s : set α) (t : α → Prop) : #({ x ∈ s | t x } : set α) = #{ x : s | t x.1 } :=
mk_congr (equiv.set.sep s t)
lemma mk_preimage_of_injective_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : set β)
(h : injective f) : lift.{v} (#(f ⁻¹' s)) ≤ lift.{u} (#s) :=
begin
rw lift_mk_le.{u v 0}, use subtype.coind (λ x, f x.1) (λ x, x.2),
apply subtype.coind_injective, exact h.comp subtype.val_injective
end
lemma mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : set β)
(h : s ⊆ range f) : lift.{u} (#s) ≤ lift.{v} (#(f ⁻¹' s)) :=
begin
rw lift_mk_le.{v u 0},
refine ⟨⟨_, _⟩⟩,
{ rintro ⟨y, hy⟩, rcases classical.subtype_of_exists (h hy) with ⟨x, rfl⟩, exact ⟨x, hy⟩ },
rintro ⟨y, hy⟩ ⟨y', hy'⟩, dsimp,
rcases classical.subtype_of_exists (h hy) with ⟨x, rfl⟩,
rcases classical.subtype_of_exists (h hy') with ⟨x', rfl⟩,
simp, intro hxx', rw hxx'
end
lemma mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range_lift {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : set β)
(h : injective f) (h2 : s ⊆ range f) : lift.{v} (#(f ⁻¹' s)) = lift.{u} (#s) :=
le_antisymm (mk_preimage_of_injective_lift f s h) (mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift f s h2)
lemma mk_preimage_of_injective (f : α → β) (s : set β) (h : injective f) :
#(f ⁻¹' s) ≤ #s :=
by { convert mk_preimage_of_injective_lift.{u u} f s h using 1; rw [lift_id] }
lemma mk_preimage_of_subset_range (f : α → β) (s : set β)
(h : s ⊆ range f) : #s ≤ #(f ⁻¹' s) :=
by { convert mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift.{u u} f s h using 1; rw [lift_id] }
lemma mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range (f : α → β) (s : set β)
(h : injective f) (h2 : s ⊆ range f) : #(f ⁻¹' s) = #s :=
by { convert mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range_lift.{u u} f s h h2 using 1; rw [lift_id] }
lemma mk_subset_ge_of_subset_image_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) {s : set α}
{t : set β} (h : t ⊆ f '' s) :
lift.{u} (#t) ≤ lift.{v} (#({ x ∈ s | f x ∈ t } : set α)) :=
by { rw [image_eq_range] at h, convert mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift _ _ h using 1,
rw [mk_sep], refl }
lemma mk_subset_ge_of_subset_image (f : α → β) {s : set α} {t : set β} (h : t ⊆ f '' s) :
#t ≤ #({ x ∈ s | f x ∈ t } : set α) :=
by { rw [image_eq_range] at h, convert mk_preimage_of_subset_range _ _ h using 1,
rw [mk_sep], refl }
theorem le_mk_iff_exists_subset {c : cardinal} {α : Type u} {s : set α} :
c ≤ #s ↔ ∃ p : set α, p ⊆ s ∧ #p = c :=
begin
rw [le_mk_iff_exists_set, ←subtype.exists_set_subtype],
apply exists_congr, intro t, rw [mk_image_eq], apply subtype.val_injective
end
/-- The function α^{<β}, defined to be sup_{γ < β} α^γ.
We index over {s : set β.out // #s < β } instead of {γ // γ < β}, because the latter lives in a
higher universe -/
noncomputable def powerlt (α β : cardinal.{u}) : cardinal.{u} :=
sup.{u u} (λ(s : {s : set β.out // #s < β}), α ^ mk.{u} s)
infix ` ^< `:80 := powerlt
theorem powerlt_aux {c c' : cardinal} (h : c < c') :
∃(s : {s : set c'.out // #s < c'}), #s = c :=
begin
cases out_embedding.mp (le_of_lt h) with f,
have : #↥(range ⇑f) = c, { rwa [mk_range_eq, mk, quotient.out_eq c], exact f.2 },
exact ⟨⟨range f, by convert h⟩, this⟩
end
lemma le_powerlt {c₁ c₂ c₃ : cardinal} (h : c₂ < c₃) : c₁ ^ c₂ ≤ c₁ ^< c₃ :=
by { rcases powerlt_aux h with ⟨s, rfl⟩, apply le_sup _ s }
lemma powerlt_le {c₁ c₂ c₃ : cardinal} : c₁ ^< c₂ ≤ c₃ ↔ ∀(c₄ < c₂), c₁ ^ c₄ ≤ c₃ :=
begin
rw [powerlt, sup_le],
split,
{ intros h c₄ hc₄, rcases powerlt_aux hc₄ with ⟨s, rfl⟩, exact h s },
intros h s, exact h _ s.2
end
lemma powerlt_le_powerlt_left {a b c : cardinal} (h : b ≤ c) : a ^< b ≤ a ^< c :=
by { rw [powerlt, sup_le], rintro ⟨s, hs⟩, apply le_powerlt, exact lt_of_lt_of_le hs h }
lemma powerlt_succ {c₁ c₂ : cardinal} (h : c₁ ≠ 0) : c₁ ^< c₂.succ = c₁ ^ c₂ :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ rw powerlt_le, intros c₃ h2, apply power_le_power_left h, rwa [←lt_succ] },
{ apply le_powerlt, apply lt_succ_self }
end
lemma powerlt_max {c₁ c₂ c₃ : cardinal} : c₁ ^< max c₂ c₃ = max (c₁ ^< c₂) (c₁ ^< c₃) :=
by { cases le_total c₂ c₃; simp only [max_eq_left, max_eq_right, h, powerlt_le_powerlt_left] }
lemma zero_powerlt {a : cardinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : 0 ^< a = 1 :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ rw [powerlt_le], intros c hc, apply zero_power_le },
convert le_powerlt (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h), rw [power_zero]
end
lemma powerlt_zero {a : cardinal} : a ^< 0 = 0 :=
begin
convert sup_eq_zero,
exact subtype.is_empty_of_false (λ x, (zero_le _).not_lt),
end
end cardinal
|
0c15eccf44cf93c7f68b5a6099d5fce1f35a26a1 | 1a61aba1b67cddccce19532a9596efe44be4285f | /library/data/nat/gcd.lean | f3e07ca5ce2fb21366d407abd524af80cd508a4c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | eigengrau/lean | 07986a0f2548688c13ba36231f6cdbee82abf4c6 | f8a773be1112015e2d232661ce616d23f12874d0 | refs/heads/master | 1,610,939,198,566 | 1,441,352,386,000 | 1,441,352,494,000 | 41,903,576 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,441,352,210,000 | 1,441,352,210,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 15,555 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
Definitions and properties of gcd, lcm, and coprime.
-/
import .div
open eq.ops well_founded decidable prod
namespace nat
/- gcd -/
private definition pair_nat.lt : nat × nat → nat × nat → Prop := measure pr₂
private definition pair_nat.lt.wf : well_founded pair_nat.lt :=
intro_k (measure.wf pr₂) 20 -- we use intro_k to be able to execute gcd efficiently in the kernel
local attribute pair_nat.lt.wf [instance] -- instance will not be saved in .olean
local infixl `≺`:50 := pair_nat.lt
private definition gcd.lt.dec (x y₁ : nat) : (succ y₁, x mod succ y₁) ≺ (x, succ y₁) :=
!mod_lt (succ_pos y₁)
definition gcd.F : Π (p₁ : nat × nat), (Π p₂ : nat × nat, p₂ ≺ p₁ → nat) → nat
| (x, 0) f := x
| (x, succ y) f := f (succ y, x mod succ y) !gcd.lt.dec
definition gcd (x y : nat) := fix gcd.F (x, y)
theorem gcd_zero_right (x : nat) : gcd x 0 = x := rfl
theorem gcd_succ (x y : nat) : gcd x (succ y) = gcd (succ y) (x mod succ y) :=
well_founded.fix_eq gcd.F (x, succ y)
theorem gcd_one_right (n : ℕ) : gcd n 1 = 1 :=
calc gcd n 1 = gcd 1 (n mod 1) : gcd_succ
... = gcd 1 0 : mod_one
theorem gcd_def (x : ℕ) : Π (y : ℕ), gcd x y = if y = 0 then x else gcd y (x mod y)
| 0 := !gcd_zero_right
| (succ y) := !gcd_succ ⬝ (if_neg !succ_ne_zero)⁻¹
theorem gcd_self : Π (n : ℕ), gcd n n = n
| 0 := rfl
| (succ n₁) := calc
gcd (succ n₁) (succ n₁) = gcd (succ n₁) (succ n₁ mod succ n₁) : gcd_succ
... = gcd (succ n₁) 0 : mod_self
theorem gcd_zero_left : Π (n : ℕ), gcd 0 n = n
| 0 := rfl
| (succ n₁) := calc
gcd 0 (succ n₁) = gcd (succ n₁) (0 mod succ n₁) : gcd_succ
... = gcd (succ n₁) 0 : zero_mod
theorem gcd_of_pos (m : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (H : n > 0) : gcd m n = gcd n (m mod n) :=
gcd_def m n ⬝ if_neg (ne_zero_of_pos H)
theorem gcd_rec (m n : ℕ) : gcd m n = gcd n (m mod n) :=
by_cases_zero_pos n
(calc
m = gcd 0 m : gcd_zero_left
... = gcd 0 (m mod 0) : mod_zero)
(take n, assume H : 0 < n, gcd_of_pos m H)
theorem gcd.induction {P : ℕ → ℕ → Prop}
(m n : ℕ)
(H0 : ∀m, P m 0)
(H1 : ∀m n, 0 < n → P n (m mod n) → P m n) :
P m n :=
induction (m, n) (prod.rec (λm, nat.rec (λ IH, H0 m)
(λ n₁ v (IH : ∀p₂, p₂ ≺ (m, succ n₁) → P (pr₁ p₂) (pr₂ p₂)),
H1 m (succ n₁) !succ_pos (IH _ !gcd.lt.dec))))
theorem gcd_dvd (m n : ℕ) : (gcd m n ∣ m) ∧ (gcd m n ∣ n) :=
gcd.induction m n
(take m, and.intro (!one_mul ▸ !dvd_mul_left) !dvd_zero)
(take m n (npos : 0 < n), and.rec
(assume (IH₁ : gcd n (m mod n) ∣ n) (IH₂ : gcd n (m mod n) ∣ (m mod n)),
have H : (gcd n (m mod n) ∣ (m div n * n + m mod n)), from
dvd_add (dvd.trans IH₁ !dvd_mul_left) IH₂,
have H1 : (gcd n (m mod n) ∣ m), from !eq_div_mul_add_mod⁻¹ ▸ H,
show (gcd m n ∣ m) ∧ (gcd m n ∣ n), from !gcd_rec⁻¹ ▸ (and.intro H1 IH₁)))
theorem gcd_dvd_left (m n : ℕ) : gcd m n ∣ m := and.left !gcd_dvd
theorem gcd_dvd_right (m n : ℕ) : gcd m n ∣ n := and.right !gcd_dvd
theorem dvd_gcd {m n k : ℕ} : k ∣ m → k ∣ n → k ∣ gcd m n :=
gcd.induction m n (take m, imp.intro)
(take m n (npos : n > 0)
(IH : k ∣ n → k ∣ m mod n → k ∣ gcd n (m mod n))
(H1 : k ∣ m) (H2 : k ∣ n),
have H3 : k ∣ m div n * n + m mod n, from !eq_div_mul_add_mod ▸ H1,
have H4 : k ∣ m mod n, from dvd_of_dvd_add_left H3 (dvd.trans H2 !dvd_mul_left),
!gcd_rec⁻¹ ▸ IH H2 H4)
theorem gcd.comm (m n : ℕ) : gcd m n = gcd n m :=
dvd.antisymm
(dvd_gcd !gcd_dvd_right !gcd_dvd_left)
(dvd_gcd !gcd_dvd_right !gcd_dvd_left)
theorem gcd.assoc (m n k : ℕ) : gcd (gcd m n) k = gcd m (gcd n k) :=
dvd.antisymm
(dvd_gcd
(dvd.trans !gcd_dvd_left !gcd_dvd_left)
(dvd_gcd (dvd.trans !gcd_dvd_left !gcd_dvd_right) !gcd_dvd_right))
(dvd_gcd
(dvd_gcd !gcd_dvd_left (dvd.trans !gcd_dvd_right !gcd_dvd_left))
(dvd.trans !gcd_dvd_right !gcd_dvd_right))
theorem gcd_one_left (m : ℕ) : gcd 1 m = 1 :=
!gcd.comm ⬝ !gcd_one_right
theorem gcd_mul_left (m n k : ℕ) : gcd (m * n) (m * k) = m * gcd n k :=
gcd.induction n k
(take n, calc gcd (m * n) (m * 0) = gcd (m * n) 0 : mul_zero)
(take n k,
assume H : 0 < k,
assume IH : gcd (m * k) (m * (n mod k)) = m * gcd k (n mod k),
calc
gcd (m * n) (m * k) = gcd (m * k) (m * n mod (m * k)) : !gcd_rec
... = gcd (m * k) (m * (n mod k)) : mul_mod_mul_left
... = m * gcd k (n mod k) : IH
... = m * gcd n k : !gcd_rec)
theorem gcd_mul_right (m n k : ℕ) : gcd (m * n) (k * n) = gcd m k * n :=
calc
gcd (m * n) (k * n) = gcd (n * m) (k * n) : mul.comm
... = gcd (n * m) (n * k) : mul.comm
... = n * gcd m k : gcd_mul_left
... = gcd m k * n : mul.comm
theorem gcd_pos_of_pos_left {m : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (mpos : m > 0) : gcd m n > 0 :=
pos_of_dvd_of_pos !gcd_dvd_left mpos
theorem gcd_pos_of_pos_right (m : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (npos : n > 0) : gcd m n > 0 :=
pos_of_dvd_of_pos !gcd_dvd_right npos
theorem eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left {m n : ℕ} (H : gcd m n = 0) : m = 0 :=
or.elim (eq_zero_or_pos m)
(assume H1, H1)
(assume H1 : m > 0, absurd H⁻¹ (ne_of_lt (!gcd_pos_of_pos_left H1)))
theorem eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right {m n : ℕ} (H : gcd m n = 0) : n = 0 :=
eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left (!gcd.comm ▸ H)
theorem gcd_div {m n k : ℕ} (H1 : k ∣ m) (H2 : k ∣ n) :
gcd (m div k) (n div k) = gcd m n div k :=
or.elim (eq_zero_or_pos k)
(assume H3 : k = 0, by subst k; rewrite *div_zero)
(assume H3 : k > 0, (div_eq_of_eq_mul_left H3 (calc
gcd m n = gcd m (n div k * k) : div_mul_cancel H2
... = gcd (m div k * k) (n div k * k) : div_mul_cancel H1
... = gcd (m div k) (n div k) * k : gcd_mul_right))⁻¹)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left (m n k : ℕ) : gcd m n ∣ gcd (k * m) n :=
dvd_gcd (dvd.trans !gcd_dvd_left !dvd_mul_left) !gcd_dvd_right
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right (m n k : ℕ) : gcd m n ∣ gcd (m * k) n :=
!mul.comm ▸ !gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left_right (m n k : ℕ) : gcd m n ∣ gcd m (k * n) :=
dvd_gcd !gcd_dvd_left (dvd.trans !gcd_dvd_right !dvd_mul_left)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right_right (m n k : ℕ) : gcd m n ∣ gcd m (n * k) :=
!mul.comm ▸ !gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left_right
/- lcm -/
definition lcm (m n : ℕ) : ℕ := m * n div (gcd m n)
theorem lcm.comm (m n : ℕ) : lcm m n = lcm n m :=
calc
lcm m n = m * n div gcd m n : rfl
... = n * m div gcd m n : mul.comm
... = n * m div gcd n m : gcd.comm
... = lcm n m : rfl
theorem lcm_zero_left (m : ℕ) : lcm 0 m = 0 :=
calc
lcm 0 m = 0 * m div gcd 0 m : rfl
... = 0 div gcd 0 m : zero_mul
... = 0 : zero_div
theorem lcm_zero_right (m : ℕ) : lcm m 0 = 0 := !lcm.comm ▸ !lcm_zero_left
theorem lcm_one_left (m : ℕ) : lcm 1 m = m :=
calc
lcm 1 m = 1 * m div gcd 1 m : rfl
... = m div gcd 1 m : one_mul
... = m div 1 : gcd_one_left
... = m : div_one
theorem lcm_one_right (m : ℕ) : lcm m 1 = m := !lcm.comm ▸ !lcm_one_left
theorem lcm_self (m : ℕ) : lcm m m = m :=
have H : m * m div m = m, from
by_cases_zero_pos m !div_zero (take m, assume H1 : m > 0, !mul_div_cancel H1),
calc
lcm m m = m * m div gcd m m : rfl
... = m * m div m : gcd_self
... = m : H
theorem dvd_lcm_left (m n : ℕ) : m ∣ lcm m n :=
have H : lcm m n = m * (n div gcd m n), from mul_div_assoc _ !gcd_dvd_right,
dvd.intro H⁻¹
theorem dvd_lcm_right (m n : ℕ) : n ∣ lcm m n :=
!lcm.comm ▸ !dvd_lcm_left
theorem gcd_mul_lcm (m n : ℕ) : gcd m n * lcm m n = m * n :=
eq.symm (eq_mul_of_div_eq_right (dvd.trans !gcd_dvd_left !dvd_mul_right) rfl)
theorem lcm_dvd {m n k : ℕ} (H1 : m ∣ k) (H2 : n ∣ k) : lcm m n ∣ k :=
or.elim (eq_zero_or_pos k)
(assume kzero : k = 0, !kzero⁻¹ ▸ !dvd_zero)
(assume kpos : k > 0,
have mpos : m > 0, from pos_of_dvd_of_pos H1 kpos,
have npos : n > 0, from pos_of_dvd_of_pos H2 kpos,
have gcd_pos : gcd m n > 0, from !gcd_pos_of_pos_left mpos,
obtain p (km : k = m * p), from exists_eq_mul_right_of_dvd H1,
obtain q (kn : k = n * q), from exists_eq_mul_right_of_dvd H2,
have ppos : p > 0, from pos_of_mul_pos_left (km ▸ kpos),
have qpos : q > 0, from pos_of_mul_pos_left (kn ▸ kpos),
have H3 : p * q * (m * n * gcd p q) = p * q * (gcd m n * k), from
calc
p * q * (m * n * gcd p q)
= m * p * (n * q * gcd p q) : by rewrite [*mul.assoc, *mul.left_comm q,
mul.left_comm p]
... = k * (k * gcd p q) : by rewrite [-kn, -km]
... = k * gcd (k * p) (k * q) : by rewrite gcd_mul_left
... = k * gcd (n * q * p) (m * p * q) : by rewrite [-kn, -km]
... = k * (gcd n m * (p * q)) : by rewrite [*mul.assoc, mul.comm q, gcd_mul_right]
... = p * q * (gcd m n * k) : by rewrite [mul.comm, mul.comm (gcd n m), gcd.comm,
*mul.assoc],
have H4 : m * n * gcd p q = gcd m n * k,
from !eq_of_mul_eq_mul_left (mul_pos ppos qpos) H3,
have H5 : gcd m n * (lcm m n * gcd p q) = gcd m n * k,
from !mul.assoc ▸ !gcd_mul_lcm⁻¹ ▸ H4,
have H6 : lcm m n * gcd p q = k,
from !eq_of_mul_eq_mul_left gcd_pos H5,
dvd.intro H6)
theorem lcm.assoc (m n k : ℕ) : lcm (lcm m n) k = lcm m (lcm n k) :=
dvd.antisymm
(lcm_dvd
(lcm_dvd !dvd_lcm_left (dvd.trans !dvd_lcm_left !dvd_lcm_right))
(dvd.trans !dvd_lcm_right !dvd_lcm_right))
(lcm_dvd
(dvd.trans !dvd_lcm_left !dvd_lcm_left)
(lcm_dvd (dvd.trans !dvd_lcm_right !dvd_lcm_left) !dvd_lcm_right))
/- coprime -/
definition coprime [reducible] (m n : ℕ) : Prop := gcd m n = 1
theorem coprime_swap {m n : ℕ} (H : coprime n m) : coprime m n :=
!gcd.comm ▸ H
theorem dvd_of_coprime_of_dvd_mul_right {m n k : ℕ} (H1 : coprime k n) (H2 : k ∣ m * n) : k ∣ m :=
have H3 : gcd (m * k) (m * n) = m, from
calc
gcd (m * k) (m * n) = m * gcd k n : gcd_mul_left
... = m * 1 : H1
... = m : mul_one,
have H4 : (k ∣ gcd (m * k) (m * n)), from dvd_gcd !dvd_mul_left H2,
H3 ▸ H4
theorem dvd_of_coprime_of_dvd_mul_left {m n k : ℕ} (H1 : coprime k m) (H2 : k ∣ m * n) : k ∣ n :=
dvd_of_coprime_of_dvd_mul_right H1 (!mul.comm ▸ H2)
theorem gcd_mul_left_cancel_of_coprime {k : ℕ} (m : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (H : coprime k n) :
gcd (k * m) n = gcd m n :=
have H1 : coprime (gcd (k * m) n) k, from
calc
gcd (gcd (k * m) n) k
= gcd (k * gcd 1 m) n : by rewrite [-gcd_mul_left, mul_one, gcd.comm, gcd.assoc]
... = 1 : by rewrite [gcd_one_left, mul_one, ↑coprime at H, H],
dvd.antisymm
(dvd_gcd (dvd_of_coprime_of_dvd_mul_left H1 !gcd_dvd_left) !gcd_dvd_right)
(dvd_gcd (dvd.trans !gcd_dvd_left !dvd_mul_left) !gcd_dvd_right)
theorem gcd_mul_right_cancel_of_coprime (m : ℕ) {k n : ℕ} (H : coprime k n) :
gcd (m * k) n = gcd m n :=
!mul.comm ▸ !gcd_mul_left_cancel_of_coprime H
theorem gcd_mul_left_cancel_of_coprime_right {k m : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (H : coprime k m) :
gcd m (k * n) = gcd m n :=
!gcd.comm ▸ !gcd.comm ▸ !gcd_mul_left_cancel_of_coprime H
theorem gcd_mul_right_cancel_of_coprime_right {k m : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (H : coprime k m) :
gcd m (n * k) = gcd m n :=
!gcd.comm ▸ !gcd.comm ▸ !gcd_mul_right_cancel_of_coprime H
theorem coprime_div_gcd_div_gcd {m n : ℕ} (H : gcd m n > 0) :
coprime (m div gcd m n) (n div gcd m n) :=
calc
gcd (m div gcd m n) (n div gcd m n) = gcd m n div gcd m n : gcd_div !gcd_dvd_left !gcd_dvd_right
... = 1 : div_self H
theorem not_coprime_of_dvd_of_dvd {m n d : ℕ} (dgt1 : d > 1) (Hm : d ∣ m) (Hn : d ∣ n) :
¬ coprime m n :=
assume co : coprime m n,
assert d ∣ gcd m n, from dvd_gcd Hm Hn,
have d ∣ 1, by rewrite [↑coprime at co, co at this]; apply this,
have d ≤ 1, from le_of_dvd dec_trivial this,
show false, from not_lt_of_ge `d ≤ 1` `d > 1`
theorem exists_coprime {m n : ℕ} (H : gcd m n > 0) :
exists m' n', coprime m' n' ∧ m = m' * gcd m n ∧ n = n' * gcd m n :=
have H1 : m = (m div gcd m n) * gcd m n, from (div_mul_cancel !gcd_dvd_left)⁻¹,
have H2 : n = (n div gcd m n) * gcd m n, from (div_mul_cancel !gcd_dvd_right)⁻¹,
exists.intro _ (exists.intro _ (and.intro (coprime_div_gcd_div_gcd H) (and.intro H1 H2)))
theorem coprime_mul {m n k : ℕ} (H1 : coprime m k) (H2 : coprime n k) : coprime (m * n) k :=
calc
gcd (m * n) k = gcd n k : !gcd_mul_left_cancel_of_coprime H1
... = 1 : H2
theorem coprime_mul_right {k m n : ℕ} (H1 : coprime k m) (H2 : coprime k n) : coprime k (m * n) :=
coprime_swap (coprime_mul (coprime_swap H1) (coprime_swap H2))
theorem coprime_of_coprime_mul_left {k m n : ℕ} (H : coprime (k * m) n) : coprime m n :=
have H1 : (gcd m n ∣ gcd (k * m) n), from !gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left,
eq_one_of_dvd_one (H ▸ H1)
theorem coprime_of_coprime_mul_right {k m n : ℕ} (H : coprime (m * k) n) : coprime m n :=
coprime_of_coprime_mul_left (!mul.comm ▸ H)
theorem coprime_of_coprime_mul_left_right {k m n : ℕ} (H : coprime m (k * n)) : coprime m n :=
coprime_swap (coprime_of_coprime_mul_left (coprime_swap H))
theorem coprime_of_coprime_mul_right_right {k m n : ℕ} (H : coprime m (n * k)) : coprime m n :=
coprime_of_coprime_mul_left_right (!mul.comm ▸ H)
theorem comprime_one_left : ∀ n, coprime 1 n :=
λ n, !gcd_one_left
theorem comprime_one_right : ∀ n, coprime n 1 :=
λ n, !gcd_one_right
theorem exists_eq_prod_and_dvd_and_dvd {m n k} (H : k ∣ m * n) :
∃ m' n', k = m' * n' ∧ m' ∣ m ∧ n' ∣ n :=
or.elim (eq_zero_or_pos (gcd k m))
(assume H1 : gcd k m = 0,
have H2 : k = 0, from eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left H1,
have H3 : m = 0, from eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right H1,
have H4 : k = 0 * n, from H2 ⬝ !zero_mul⁻¹,
have H5 : 0 ∣ m, from H3⁻¹ ▸ !dvd.refl,
have H6 : n ∣ n, from !dvd.refl,
exists.intro _ (exists.intro _ (and.intro H4 (and.intro H5 H6))))
(assume H1 : gcd k m > 0,
have H2 : gcd k m ∣ k, from !gcd_dvd_left,
have H3 : k div gcd k m ∣ (m * n) div gcd k m, from div_dvd_div H2 H,
have H4 : (m * n) div gcd k m = (m div gcd k m) * n, from
calc
m * n div gcd k m = n * m div gcd k m : mul.comm
... = n * (m div gcd k m) : !mul_div_assoc !gcd_dvd_right
... = m div gcd k m * n : mul.comm,
have H5 : k div gcd k m ∣ (m div gcd k m) * n, from H4 ▸ H3,
have H6 : coprime (k div gcd k m) (m div gcd k m), from coprime_div_gcd_div_gcd H1,
have H7 : k div gcd k m ∣ n, from dvd_of_coprime_of_dvd_mul_left H6 H5,
have H8 : k = gcd k m * (k div gcd k m), from (mul_div_cancel' H2)⁻¹,
exists.intro _ (exists.intro _ (and.intro H8 (and.intro !gcd_dvd_right H7))))
end nat
|
a2abd2a8a9f24a309be96ef05eb403159a37687f | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/measure_theory/measurable_space.lean | 8f41f84ede036ceddfc522a504781715f2167a90 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 62,806 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import algebra.indicator_function
import data.tprod
import group_theory.coset
import logic.equiv.fin
import measure_theory.measurable_space_def
import measure_theory.tactic
import order.filter.lift
/-!
# Measurable spaces and measurable functions
This file provides properties of measurable spaces and the functions and isomorphisms
between them. The definition of a measurable space is in `measure_theory.measurable_space_def`.
A measurable space is a set equipped with a σ-algebra, a collection of
subsets closed under complementation and countable union. A function
between measurable spaces is measurable if the preimage of each
measurable subset is measurable.
σ-algebras on a fixed set `α` form a complete lattice. Here we order
σ-algebras by writing `m₁ ≤ m₂` if every set which is `m₁`-measurable is
also `m₂`-measurable (that is, `m₁` is a subset of `m₂`). In particular, any
collection of subsets of `α` generates a smallest σ-algebra which
contains all of them. A function `f : α → β` induces a Galois connection
between the lattices of σ-algebras on `α` and `β`.
A measurable equivalence between measurable spaces is an equivalence
which respects the σ-algebras, that is, for which both directions of
the equivalence are measurable functions.
We say that a filter `f` is measurably generated if every set `s ∈ f` includes a measurable
set `t ∈ f`. This property is useful, e.g., to extract a measurable witness of `filter.eventually`.
## Notation
* We write `α ≃ᵐ β` for measurable equivalences between the measurable spaces `α` and `β`.
This should not be confused with `≃ₘ` which is used for diffeomorphisms between manifolds.
## Implementation notes
Measurability of a function `f : α → β` between measurable spaces is
defined in terms of the Galois connection induced by f.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measurable_space>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigma-algebra>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynkin_system>
## Tags
measurable space, σ-algebra, measurable function, measurable equivalence, dynkin system,
π-λ theorem, π-system
-/
open set encodable function equiv
open_locale filter measure_theory
variables {α β γ δ δ' : Type*} {ι : Sort*} {s t u : set α}
namespace measurable_space
section functors
variables {m m₁ m₂ : measurable_space α} {m' : measurable_space β} {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
/-- The forward image of a measurable space under a function. `map f m` contains the sets
`s : set β` whose preimage under `f` is measurable. -/
protected def map (f : α → β) (m : measurable_space α) : measurable_space β :=
{ measurable_set' := λ s, m.measurable_set' $ f ⁻¹' s,
measurable_set_empty := m.measurable_set_empty,
measurable_set_compl := assume s hs, m.measurable_set_compl _ hs,
measurable_set_Union := assume f hf, by { rw preimage_Union, exact m.measurable_set_Union _ hf }}
@[simp] lemma map_id : m.map id = m :=
measurable_space.ext $ assume s, iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma map_comp {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} : (m.map f).map g = m.map (g ∘ f) :=
measurable_space.ext $ assume s, iff.rfl
/-- The reverse image of a measurable space under a function. `comap f m` contains the sets
`s : set α` such that `s` is the `f`-preimage of a measurable set in `β`. -/
protected def comap (f : α → β) (m : measurable_space β) : measurable_space α :=
{ measurable_set' := λ s, ∃s', m.measurable_set' s' ∧ f ⁻¹' s' = s,
measurable_set_empty := ⟨∅, m.measurable_set_empty, rfl⟩,
measurable_set_compl := assume s ⟨s', h₁, h₂⟩, ⟨s'ᶜ, m.measurable_set_compl _ h₁, h₂ ▸ rfl⟩,
measurable_set_Union := assume s hs,
let ⟨s', hs'⟩ := classical.axiom_of_choice hs in
⟨⋃ i, s' i, m.measurable_set_Union _ (λ i, (hs' i).left), by simp [hs'] ⟩ }
@[simp] lemma comap_id : m.comap id = m :=
measurable_space.ext $ assume s, ⟨assume ⟨s', hs', h⟩, h ▸ hs', assume h, ⟨s, h, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma comap_comp {f : β → α} {g : γ → β} : (m.comap f).comap g = m.comap (f ∘ g) :=
measurable_space.ext $ assume s,
⟨assume ⟨t, ⟨u, h, hu⟩, ht⟩, ⟨u, h, ht ▸ hu ▸ rfl⟩, assume ⟨t, h, ht⟩, ⟨f ⁻¹' t, ⟨_, h, rfl⟩, ht⟩⟩
lemma comap_le_iff_le_map {f : α → β} : m'.comap f ≤ m ↔ m' ≤ m.map f :=
⟨assume h s hs, h _ ⟨_, hs, rfl⟩, assume h s ⟨t, ht, heq⟩, heq ▸ h _ ht⟩
lemma gc_comap_map (f : α → β) :
galois_connection (measurable_space.comap f) (measurable_space.map f) :=
assume f g, comap_le_iff_le_map
lemma map_mono (h : m₁ ≤ m₂) : m₁.map f ≤ m₂.map f := (gc_comap_map f).monotone_u h
lemma monotone_map : monotone (measurable_space.map f) := assume a b h, map_mono h
lemma comap_mono (h : m₁ ≤ m₂) : m₁.comap g ≤ m₂.comap g := (gc_comap_map g).monotone_l h
lemma monotone_comap : monotone (measurable_space.comap g) := assume a b h, comap_mono h
@[simp] lemma comap_bot : (⊥ : measurable_space α).comap g = ⊥ := (gc_comap_map g).l_bot
@[simp] lemma comap_sup : (m₁ ⊔ m₂).comap g = m₁.comap g ⊔ m₂.comap g := (gc_comap_map g).l_sup
@[simp] lemma comap_supr {m : ι → measurable_space α} : (⨆i, m i).comap g = (⨆i, (m i).comap g) :=
(gc_comap_map g).l_supr
@[simp] lemma map_top : (⊤ : measurable_space α).map f = ⊤ := (gc_comap_map f).u_top
@[simp] lemma map_inf : (m₁ ⊓ m₂).map f = m₁.map f ⊓ m₂.map f := (gc_comap_map f).u_inf
@[simp] lemma map_infi {m : ι → measurable_space α} : (⨅i, m i).map f = (⨅i, (m i).map f) :=
(gc_comap_map f).u_infi
lemma comap_map_le : (m.map f).comap f ≤ m := (gc_comap_map f).l_u_le _
lemma le_map_comap : m ≤ (m.comap g).map g := (gc_comap_map g).le_u_l _
end functors
@[mono] lemma generate_from_mono {s t : set (set α)} (h : s ⊆ t) :
generate_from s ≤ generate_from t :=
gi_generate_from.gc.monotone_l h
lemma generate_from_sup_generate_from {s t : set (set α)} :
generate_from s ⊔ generate_from t = generate_from (s ∪ t) :=
(@gi_generate_from α).gc.l_sup.symm
lemma comap_generate_from {f : α → β} {s : set (set β)} :
(generate_from s).comap f = generate_from (preimage f '' s) :=
le_antisymm
(comap_le_iff_le_map.2 $ generate_from_le $ assume t hts,
generate_measurable.basic _ $ mem_image_of_mem _ $ hts)
(generate_from_le $ assume t ⟨u, hu, eq⟩, eq ▸ ⟨u, generate_measurable.basic _ hu, rfl⟩)
end measurable_space
section measurable_functions
open measurable_space
lemma measurable_iff_le_map {m₁ : measurable_space α} {m₂ : measurable_space β} {f : α → β} :
measurable f ↔ m₂ ≤ m₁.map f :=
iff.rfl
alias measurable_iff_le_map ↔ measurable.le_map measurable.of_le_map
lemma measurable_iff_comap_le {m₁ : measurable_space α} {m₂ : measurable_space β} {f : α → β} :
measurable f ↔ m₂.comap f ≤ m₁ :=
comap_le_iff_le_map.symm
alias measurable_iff_comap_le ↔ measurable.comap_le measurable.of_comap_le
lemma measurable.mono {ma ma' : measurable_space α} {mb mb' : measurable_space β} {f : α → β}
(hf : @measurable α β ma mb f) (ha : ma ≤ ma') (hb : mb' ≤ mb) :
@measurable α β ma' mb' f :=
λ t ht, ha _ $ hf $ hb _ ht
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_from_top [measurable_space β] {f : α → β} : measurable[⊤] f :=
λ s hs, trivial
lemma measurable_generate_from [measurable_space α] {s : set (set β)} {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ t ∈ s, measurable_set (f ⁻¹' t)) : @measurable _ _ _ (generate_from s) f :=
measurable.of_le_map $ generate_from_le h
variables {f g : α → β}
section typeclass_measurable_space
variables [measurable_space α] [measurable_space β] [measurable_space γ]
@[nontriviality, measurability]
lemma subsingleton.measurable [subsingleton α] : measurable f :=
λ s hs, @subsingleton.measurable_set α _ _ _
@[nontriviality, measurability]
lemma measurable_of_subsingleton_codomain [subsingleton β] (f : α → β) :
measurable f :=
λ s hs, subsingleton.set_cases measurable_set.empty measurable_set.univ s
@[to_additive]
lemma measurable_one [has_one α] : measurable (1 : β → α) := @measurable_const _ _ _ _ 1
lemma measurable_of_empty [is_empty α] (f : α → β) : measurable f :=
subsingleton.measurable
lemma measurable_of_empty_codomain [is_empty β] (f : α → β) : measurable f :=
by { haveI := function.is_empty f, exact measurable_of_empty f }
/-- A version of `measurable_const` that assumes `f x = f y` for all `x, y`. This version works
for functions between empty types. -/
lemma measurable_const' {f : β → α} (hf : ∀ x y, f x = f y) : measurable f :=
begin
casesI is_empty_or_nonempty β,
{ exact measurable_of_empty f },
{ convert measurable_const, exact funext (λ x, hf x h.some) }
end
lemma measurable_of_fintype [fintype α] [measurable_singleton_class α] (f : α → β) :
measurable f :=
λ s hs, (finite.of_fintype (f ⁻¹' s)).measurable_set
end typeclass_measurable_space
variables {m : measurable_space α}
include m
@[measurability] lemma measurable.iterate {f : α → α} (hf : measurable f) : ∀ n, measurable (f^[n])
| 0 := measurable_id
| (n+1) := (measurable.iterate n).comp hf
variables {mβ : measurable_space β}
include mβ
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_set_preimage {t : set β} (hf : measurable f) (ht : measurable_set t) :
measurable_set (f ⁻¹' t) :=
hf ht
@[measurability]
lemma measurable.piecewise {_ : decidable_pred (∈ s)} (hs : measurable_set s)
(hf : measurable f) (hg : measurable g) :
measurable (piecewise s f g) :=
begin
intros t ht,
rw piecewise_preimage,
exact hs.ite (hf ht) (hg ht)
end
/-- this is slightly different from `measurable.piecewise`. It can be used to show
`measurable (ite (x=0) 0 1)` by
`exact measurable.ite (measurable_set_singleton 0) measurable_const measurable_const`,
but replacing `measurable.ite` by `measurable.piecewise` in that example proof does not work. -/
lemma measurable.ite {p : α → Prop} {_ : decidable_pred p}
(hp : measurable_set {a : α | p a}) (hf : measurable f) (hg : measurable g) :
measurable (λ x, ite (p x) (f x) (g x)) :=
measurable.piecewise hp hf hg
@[measurability]
lemma measurable.indicator [has_zero β] (hf : measurable f) (hs : measurable_set s) :
measurable (s.indicator f) :=
hf.piecewise hs measurable_const
@[measurability, to_additive] lemma measurable_set_mul_support [has_one β]
[measurable_singleton_class β] (hf : measurable f) :
measurable_set (mul_support f) :=
hf (measurable_set_singleton 1).compl
/-- If a function coincides with a measurable function outside of a countable set, it is
measurable. -/
lemma measurable.measurable_of_countable_ne [measurable_singleton_class α]
(hf : measurable f) (h : countable {x | f x ≠ g x}) : measurable g :=
begin
assume t ht,
have : g ⁻¹' t = (g ⁻¹' t ∩ {x | f x = g x}ᶜ) ∪ (g ⁻¹' t ∩ {x | f x = g x}),
by simp [← inter_union_distrib_left],
rw this,
apply measurable_set.union (h.mono (inter_subset_right _ _)).measurable_set,
have : g ⁻¹' t ∩ {x : α | f x = g x} = f ⁻¹' t ∩ {x : α | f x = g x},
by { ext x, simp {contextual := tt} },
rw this,
exact (hf ht).inter h.measurable_set.of_compl,
end
end measurable_functions
section constructions
instance : measurable_space empty := ⊤
instance : measurable_space punit := ⊤ -- this also works for `unit`
instance : measurable_space bool := ⊤
instance : measurable_space ℕ := ⊤
instance : measurable_space ℤ := ⊤
instance : measurable_space ℚ := ⊤
instance : measurable_singleton_class empty := ⟨λ _, trivial⟩
instance : measurable_singleton_class punit := ⟨λ _, trivial⟩
instance : measurable_singleton_class bool := ⟨λ _, trivial⟩
instance : measurable_singleton_class ℕ := ⟨λ _, trivial⟩
instance : measurable_singleton_class ℤ := ⟨λ _, trivial⟩
instance : measurable_singleton_class ℚ := ⟨λ _, trivial⟩
lemma measurable_to_encodable [measurable_space α] [encodable α] [measurable_space β] {f : β → α}
(h : ∀ y, measurable_set (f ⁻¹' {f y})) :
measurable f :=
begin
assume s hs,
rw [← bUnion_preimage_singleton],
refine measurable_set.Union (λ y, measurable_set.Union_Prop $ λ hy, _),
by_cases hyf : y ∈ range f,
{ rcases hyf with ⟨y, rfl⟩,
apply h },
{ simp only [preimage_singleton_eq_empty.2 hyf, measurable_set.empty] }
end
@[measurability] lemma measurable_unit [measurable_space α] (f : unit → α) : measurable f :=
measurable_from_top
section nat
variables [measurable_space α]
@[measurability] lemma measurable_from_nat {f : ℕ → α} : measurable f :=
measurable_from_top
lemma measurable_to_nat {f : α → ℕ} : (∀ y, measurable_set (f ⁻¹' {f y})) → measurable f :=
measurable_to_encodable
lemma measurable_find_greatest' {p : α → ℕ → Prop} [∀ x, decidable_pred (p x)]
{N : ℕ} (hN : ∀ k ≤ N, measurable_set {x | nat.find_greatest (p x) N = k}) :
measurable (λ x, nat.find_greatest (p x) N) :=
measurable_to_nat $ λ x, hN _ N.find_greatest_le
lemma measurable_find_greatest {p : α → ℕ → Prop} [∀ x, decidable_pred (p x)]
{N} (hN : ∀ k ≤ N, measurable_set {x | p x k}) :
measurable (λ x, nat.find_greatest (p x) N) :=
begin
refine measurable_find_greatest' (λ k hk, _),
simp only [nat.find_greatest_eq_iff, set_of_and, set_of_forall, ← compl_set_of],
repeat { apply_rules [measurable_set.inter, measurable_set.const, measurable_set.Inter,
measurable_set.Inter_Prop, measurable_set.compl, hN]; try { intros } }
end
lemma measurable_find {p : α → ℕ → Prop} [∀ x, decidable_pred (p x)]
(hp : ∀ x, ∃ N, p x N) (hm : ∀ k, measurable_set {x | p x k}) :
measurable (λ x, nat.find (hp x)) :=
begin
refine measurable_to_nat (λ x, _),
rw [preimage_find_eq_disjointed],
exact measurable_set.disjointed hm _
end
end nat
section quotient
variables [measurable_space α] [measurable_space β]
instance {α} {r : α → α → Prop} [m : measurable_space α] : measurable_space (quot r) :=
m.map (quot.mk r)
instance {α} {s : setoid α} [m : measurable_space α] : measurable_space (quotient s) :=
m.map quotient.mk'
@[to_additive]
instance _root_.quotient_group.measurable_space {G} [group G] [measurable_space G]
(S : subgroup G) : measurable_space (G ⧸ S) :=
quotient.measurable_space
lemma measurable_set_quotient {s : setoid α} {t : set (quotient s)} :
measurable_set t ↔ measurable_set (quotient.mk' ⁻¹' t) :=
iff.rfl
lemma measurable_from_quotient {s : setoid α} {f : quotient s → β} :
measurable f ↔ measurable (f ∘ quotient.mk') :=
iff.rfl
@[measurability] lemma measurable_quotient_mk [s : setoid α] :
measurable (quotient.mk : α → quotient s) :=
λ s, id
@[measurability] lemma measurable_quotient_mk' {s : setoid α} :
measurable (quotient.mk' : α → quotient s) :=
λ s, id
@[measurability] lemma measurable_quot_mk {r : α → α → Prop} :
measurable (quot.mk r) :=
λ s, id
@[to_additive] lemma quotient_group.measurable_coe {G} [group G] [measurable_space G]
{S : subgroup G} : measurable (coe : G → G ⧸ S) :=
measurable_quotient_mk'
attribute [measurability] quotient_group.measurable_coe quotient_add_group.measurable_coe
@[to_additive] lemma quotient_group.measurable_from_quotient {G} [group G] [measurable_space G]
{S : subgroup G} {f : G ⧸ S → α} :
measurable f ↔ measurable (f ∘ (coe : G → G ⧸ S)) :=
measurable_from_quotient
end quotient
section subtype
instance {α} {p : α → Prop} [m : measurable_space α] : measurable_space (subtype p) :=
m.comap (coe : _ → α)
section
variables [measurable_space α]
@[measurability] lemma measurable_subtype_coe {p : α → Prop} : measurable (coe : subtype p → α) :=
measurable_space.le_map_comap
instance {p : α → Prop} [measurable_singleton_class α] : measurable_singleton_class (subtype p) :=
{ measurable_set_singleton := λ x,
begin
have : measurable_set {(x : α)} := measurable_set_singleton _,
convert @measurable_subtype_coe α _ p _ this,
ext y,
simp [subtype.ext_iff],
end }
end
variables {m : measurable_space α} {mβ : measurable_space β}
include m
lemma measurable_set.subtype_image {s : set α} {t : set s}
(hs : measurable_set s) : measurable_set t → measurable_set ((coe : s → α) '' t)
| ⟨u, (hu : measurable_set u), (eq : coe ⁻¹' u = t)⟩ :=
begin
rw [← eq, subtype.image_preimage_coe],
exact hu.inter hs
end
include mβ
@[measurability] lemma measurable.subtype_coe {p : β → Prop} {f : α → subtype p}
(hf : measurable f) :
measurable (λ a : α, (f a : β)) :=
measurable_subtype_coe.comp hf
@[measurability]
lemma measurable.subtype_mk {p : β → Prop} {f : α → β} (hf : measurable f) {h : ∀ x, p (f x)} :
measurable (λ x, (⟨f x, h x⟩ : subtype p)) :=
λ t ⟨s, hs⟩, hs.2 ▸ by simp only [← preimage_comp, (∘), subtype.coe_mk, hf hs.1]
lemma measurable_of_measurable_union_cover
{f : α → β} (s t : set α) (hs : measurable_set s) (ht : measurable_set t) (h : univ ⊆ s ∪ t)
(hc : measurable (λ a : s, f a)) (hd : measurable (λ a : t, f a)) :
measurable f :=
begin
intros u hu,
convert (hs.subtype_image (hc hu)).union (ht.subtype_image (hd hu)),
change f ⁻¹' u = coe '' (coe ⁻¹' (f ⁻¹' u) : set s) ∪ coe '' (coe ⁻¹' (f ⁻¹' u) : set t),
rw [image_preimage_eq_inter_range, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, subtype.range_coe,
subtype.range_coe, ← inter_distrib_left, univ_subset_iff.1 h, inter_univ],
end
lemma measurable_of_restrict_of_restrict_compl {f : α → β} {s : set α}
(hs : measurable_set s) (h₁ : measurable (s.restrict f)) (h₂ : measurable (sᶜ.restrict f)) :
measurable f :=
measurable_of_measurable_union_cover s sᶜ hs hs.compl (union_compl_self s).ge h₁ h₂
lemma measurable.dite [∀ x, decidable (x ∈ s)] {f : s → β} (hf : measurable f)
{g : sᶜ → β} (hg : measurable g) (hs : measurable_set s) :
measurable (λ x, if hx : x ∈ s then f ⟨x, hx⟩ else g ⟨x, hx⟩) :=
measurable_of_restrict_of_restrict_compl hs (by simpa) (by simpa)
lemma measurable_of_measurable_on_compl_finite [measurable_singleton_class α]
{f : α → β} (s : set α) (hs : finite s) (hf : measurable (sᶜ.restrict f)) :
measurable f :=
begin
letI : fintype s := finite.fintype hs,
exact measurable_of_restrict_of_restrict_compl hs.measurable_set
(measurable_of_fintype _) hf
end
lemma measurable_of_measurable_on_compl_singleton [measurable_singleton_class α]
{f : α → β} (a : α) (hf : measurable ({x | x ≠ a}.restrict f)) :
measurable f :=
measurable_of_measurable_on_compl_finite {a} (finite_singleton a) hf
end subtype
section prod
/-- A `measurable_space` structure on the product of two measurable spaces. -/
def measurable_space.prod {α β} (m₁ : measurable_space α) (m₂ : measurable_space β) :
measurable_space (α × β) :=
m₁.comap prod.fst ⊔ m₂.comap prod.snd
instance {α β} [m₁ : measurable_space α] [m₂ : measurable_space β] : measurable_space (α × β) :=
m₁.prod m₂
@[measurability] lemma measurable_fst {ma : measurable_space α} {mb : measurable_space β} :
measurable (prod.fst : α × β → α) :=
measurable.of_comap_le le_sup_left
@[measurability] lemma measurable_snd {ma : measurable_space α} {mb : measurable_space β} :
measurable (prod.snd : α × β → β) :=
measurable.of_comap_le le_sup_right
variables {m : measurable_space α} {mβ : measurable_space β} {mγ : measurable_space γ}
include m mβ mγ
lemma measurable.fst {f : α → β × γ} (hf : measurable f) :
measurable (λ a : α, (f a).1) :=
measurable_fst.comp hf
lemma measurable.snd {f : α → β × γ} (hf : measurable f) :
measurable (λ a : α, (f a).2) :=
measurable_snd.comp hf
@[measurability] lemma measurable.prod {f : α → β × γ}
(hf₁ : measurable (λ a, (f a).1)) (hf₂ : measurable (λ a, (f a).2)) : measurable f :=
measurable.of_le_map $ sup_le
(by { rw [measurable_space.comap_le_iff_le_map, measurable_space.map_comp], exact hf₁ })
(by { rw [measurable_space.comap_le_iff_le_map, measurable_space.map_comp], exact hf₂ })
lemma measurable.prod_mk {β γ} {mβ : measurable_space β}
{mγ : measurable_space γ} {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (hf : measurable f) (hg : measurable g) :
measurable (λ a : α, (f a, g a)) :=
measurable.prod hf hg
lemma measurable.prod_map [measurable_space δ] {f : α → β} {g : γ → δ} (hf : measurable f)
(hg : measurable g) : measurable (prod.map f g) :=
(hf.comp measurable_fst).prod_mk (hg.comp measurable_snd)
omit mγ
lemma measurable_prod_mk_left {x : α} : measurable (@prod.mk _ β x) :=
measurable_const.prod_mk measurable_id
lemma measurable_prod_mk_right {y : β} : measurable (λ x : α, (x, y)) :=
measurable_id.prod_mk measurable_const
include mγ
lemma measurable.of_uncurry_left {f : α → β → γ} (hf : measurable (uncurry f)) {x : α} :
measurable (f x) :=
hf.comp measurable_prod_mk_left
lemma measurable.of_uncurry_right {f : α → β → γ} (hf : measurable (uncurry f)) {y : β} :
measurable (λ x, f x y) :=
hf.comp measurable_prod_mk_right
lemma measurable_prod {f : α → β × γ} : measurable f ↔
measurable (λ a, (f a).1) ∧ measurable (λ a, (f a).2) :=
⟨λ hf, ⟨measurable_fst.comp hf, measurable_snd.comp hf⟩, λ h, measurable.prod h.1 h.2⟩
omit mγ
@[measurability] lemma measurable_swap :
measurable (prod.swap : α × β → β × α) :=
measurable.prod measurable_snd measurable_fst
lemma measurable_swap_iff {mγ : measurable_space γ} {f : α × β → γ} :
measurable (f ∘ prod.swap) ↔ measurable f :=
⟨λ hf, by { convert hf.comp measurable_swap, ext ⟨x, y⟩, refl }, λ hf, hf.comp measurable_swap⟩
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_set.prod {s : set α} {t : set β} (hs : measurable_set s) (ht : measurable_set t) :
measurable_set (s ×ˢ t) :=
measurable_set.inter (measurable_fst hs) (measurable_snd ht)
lemma measurable_set_prod_of_nonempty {s : set α} {t : set β} (h : (s ×ˢ t : set _).nonempty) :
measurable_set (s ×ˢ t) ↔ measurable_set s ∧ measurable_set t :=
begin
rcases h with ⟨⟨x, y⟩, hx, hy⟩,
refine ⟨λ hst, _, λ h, h.1.prod h.2⟩,
have : measurable_set ((λ x, (x, y)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t) := measurable_prod_mk_right hst,
have : measurable_set (prod.mk x ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t) := measurable_prod_mk_left hst,
simp * at *
end
lemma measurable_set_prod {s : set α} {t : set β} :
measurable_set (s ×ˢ t) ↔ (measurable_set s ∧ measurable_set t) ∨ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ :=
begin
cases (s ×ˢ t : set _).eq_empty_or_nonempty with h h,
{ simp [h, prod_eq_empty_iff.mp h] },
{ simp [←not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, prod_nonempty_iff.mp h, measurable_set_prod_of_nonempty h] }
end
lemma measurable_set_swap_iff {s : set (α × β)} :
measurable_set (prod.swap ⁻¹' s) ↔ measurable_set s :=
⟨λ hs, by { convert measurable_swap hs, ext ⟨x, y⟩, refl }, λ hs, measurable_swap hs⟩
lemma measurable_from_prod_encodable [encodable β] [measurable_singleton_class β]
{mγ : measurable_space γ} {f : α × β → γ} (hf : ∀ y, measurable (λ x, f (x, y))) :
measurable f :=
begin
intros s hs,
have : f ⁻¹' s = ⋃ y, ((λ x, f (x, y)) ⁻¹' s) ×ˢ ({y} : set β),
{ ext1 ⟨x, y⟩,
simp [and_assoc, and.left_comm] },
rw this,
exact measurable_set.Union (λ y, (hf y hs).prod (measurable_set_singleton y))
end
/-- A piecewise function on countably many pieces is measurable if all the data is measurable. -/
@[measurability]
lemma measurable.find {m : measurable_space α}
{f : ℕ → α → β} {p : ℕ → α → Prop} [∀ n, decidable_pred (p n)]
(hf : ∀ n, measurable (f n)) (hp : ∀ n, measurable_set {x | p n x}) (h : ∀ x, ∃ n, p n x) :
measurable (λ x, f (nat.find (h x)) x) :=
begin
have : measurable (λ (p : α × ℕ), f p.2 p.1) := measurable_from_prod_encodable (λ n, hf n),
exact this.comp (measurable.prod_mk measurable_id (measurable_find h hp)),
end
/-- Given countably many disjoint measurable sets `t n` and countably many measurable
functions `g n`, one can construct a measurable function that coincides with `g n` on `t n`. -/
lemma exists_measurable_piecewise_nat {m : measurable_space α} (t : ℕ → set β)
(t_meas : ∀ n, measurable_set (t n)) (t_disj : pairwise (disjoint on t))
(g : ℕ → β → α) (hg : ∀ n, measurable (g n)) :
∃ f : β → α, measurable f ∧ (∀ n x, x ∈ t n → f x = g n x) :=
begin
classical,
let p : ℕ → β → Prop := λ n x, x ∈ t n ∪ (⋃ k, t k)ᶜ,
have M : ∀ n, measurable_set {x | p n x} :=
λ n, (t_meas n).union (measurable_set.compl (measurable_set.Union t_meas)),
have P : ∀ x, ∃ n, p n x,
{ assume x,
by_cases H : ∀ (i : ℕ), x ∉ t i,
{ exact ⟨0, or.inr (by simpa only [mem_Inter, compl_Union] using H)⟩ },
{ simp only [not_forall, not_not_mem] at H,
rcases H with ⟨n, hn⟩,
exact ⟨n, or.inl hn⟩ } },
refine ⟨λ x, g (nat.find (P x)) x, measurable.find hg M P, _⟩,
assume n x hx,
have : x ∈ t (nat.find (P x)),
{ have B : x ∈ t (nat.find (P x)) ∪ (⋃ k, t k)ᶜ := nat.find_spec (P x),
have B' : (∀ (i : ℕ), x ∉ t i) ↔ false,
{ simp only [iff_false, not_forall, not_not_mem], exact ⟨n, hx⟩ },
simpa only [B', mem_union_eq, mem_Inter, or_false, compl_Union, mem_compl_eq] using B },
congr,
by_contra h,
exact t_disj n (nat.find (P x)) (ne.symm h) ⟨hx, this⟩
end
end prod
section pi
variables {π : δ → Type*} [measurable_space α]
instance measurable_space.pi [m : Π a, measurable_space (π a)] : measurable_space (Π a, π a) :=
⨆ a, (m a).comap (λ b, b a)
variables [Π a, measurable_space (π a)] [measurable_space γ]
lemma measurable_pi_iff {g : α → Π a, π a} :
measurable g ↔ ∀ a, measurable (λ x, g x a) :=
by simp_rw [measurable_iff_comap_le, measurable_space.pi, measurable_space.comap_supr,
measurable_space.comap_comp, function.comp, supr_le_iff]
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_pi_apply (a : δ) : measurable (λ f : Π a, π a, f a) :=
measurable.of_comap_le $ le_supr _ a
@[measurability]
lemma measurable.eval {a : δ} {g : α → Π a, π a}
(hg : measurable g) : measurable (λ x, g x a) :=
(measurable_pi_apply a).comp hg
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_pi_lambda (f : α → Π a, π a) (hf : ∀ a, measurable (λ c, f c a)) :
measurable f :=
measurable_pi_iff.mpr hf
/-- The function `update f a : π a → Π a, π a` is always measurable.
This doesn't require `f` to be measurable.
This should not be confused with the statement that `update f a x` is measurable. -/
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_update (f : Π (a : δ), π a) {a : δ} [decidable_eq δ] : measurable (update f a) :=
begin
apply measurable_pi_lambda,
intro x, by_cases hx : x = a,
{ cases hx, convert measurable_id, ext, simp },
simp_rw [update_noteq hx], apply measurable_const,
end
/- Even though we cannot use projection notation, we still keep a dot to be consistent with similar
lemmas, like `measurable_set.prod`. -/
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_set.pi {s : set δ} {t : Π i : δ, set (π i)} (hs : countable s)
(ht : ∀ i ∈ s, measurable_set (t i)) :
measurable_set (s.pi t) :=
by { rw [pi_def], exact measurable_set.bInter hs (λ i hi, measurable_pi_apply _ (ht i hi)) }
lemma measurable_set.univ_pi [encodable δ] {t : Π i : δ, set (π i)}
(ht : ∀ i, measurable_set (t i)) : measurable_set (pi univ t) :=
measurable_set.pi (countable_encodable _) (λ i _, ht i)
lemma measurable_set_pi_of_nonempty
{s : set δ} {t : Π i, set (π i)} (hs : countable s)
(h : (pi s t).nonempty) : measurable_set (pi s t) ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, measurable_set (t i) :=
begin
classical,
rcases h with ⟨f, hf⟩, refine ⟨λ hst i hi, _, measurable_set.pi hs⟩,
convert measurable_update f hst, rw [update_preimage_pi hi], exact λ j hj _, hf j hj
end
lemma measurable_set_pi {s : set δ} {t : Π i, set (π i)} (hs : countable s) :
measurable_set (pi s t) ↔ (∀ i ∈ s, measurable_set (t i)) ∨ pi s t = ∅ :=
begin
cases (pi s t).eq_empty_or_nonempty with h h,
{ simp [h] },
{ simp [measurable_set_pi_of_nonempty hs, h, ← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty] }
end
section
variable (π)
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_pi_equiv_pi_subtype_prod_symm (p : δ → Prop) [decidable_pred p] :
measurable (equiv.pi_equiv_pi_subtype_prod p π).symm :=
begin
apply measurable_pi_iff.2 (λ j, _),
by_cases hj : p j,
{ simp only [hj, dif_pos, equiv.pi_equiv_pi_subtype_prod_symm_apply],
have : measurable (λ (f : (Π (i : {x // p x}), π ↑i)), f ⟨j, hj⟩) :=
measurable_pi_apply ⟨j, hj⟩,
exact measurable.comp this measurable_fst },
{ simp only [hj, equiv.pi_equiv_pi_subtype_prod_symm_apply, dif_neg, not_false_iff],
have : measurable (λ (f : (Π (i : {x // ¬ p x}), π ↑i)), f ⟨j, hj⟩) :=
measurable_pi_apply ⟨j, hj⟩,
exact measurable.comp this measurable_snd }
end
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_pi_equiv_pi_subtype_prod (p : δ → Prop) [decidable_pred p] :
measurable (equiv.pi_equiv_pi_subtype_prod p π) :=
begin
refine measurable_prod.2 _,
split;
{ apply measurable_pi_iff.2 (λ j, _),
simp only [pi_equiv_pi_subtype_prod_apply, measurable_pi_apply] }
end
end
section fintype
local attribute [instance] fintype.to_encodable
lemma measurable_set.pi_fintype [fintype δ] {s : set δ} {t : Π i, set (π i)}
(ht : ∀ i ∈ s, measurable_set (t i)) : measurable_set (pi s t) :=
measurable_set.pi (countable_encodable _) ht
lemma measurable_set.univ_pi_fintype [fintype δ] {t : Π i, set (π i)}
(ht : ∀ i, measurable_set (t i)) : measurable_set (pi univ t) :=
measurable_set.pi_fintype (λ i _, ht i)
end fintype
end pi
instance tprod.measurable_space (π : δ → Type*) [∀ x, measurable_space (π x)] :
∀ (l : list δ), measurable_space (list.tprod π l)
| [] := punit.measurable_space
| (i :: is) := @prod.measurable_space _ _ _ (tprod.measurable_space is)
section tprod
open list
variables {π : δ → Type*} [∀ x, measurable_space (π x)]
lemma measurable_tprod_mk (l : list δ) : measurable (@tprod.mk δ π l) :=
begin
induction l with i l ih,
{ exact measurable_const },
{ exact (measurable_pi_apply i).prod_mk ih }
end
lemma measurable_tprod_elim [decidable_eq δ] : ∀ {l : list δ} {i : δ} (hi : i ∈ l),
measurable (λ (v : tprod π l), v.elim hi)
| (i :: is) j hj := begin
by_cases hji : j = i,
{ subst hji, simp [measurable_fst] },
{ rw [funext $ tprod.elim_of_ne _ hji],
exact (measurable_tprod_elim (hj.resolve_left hji)).comp measurable_snd }
end
lemma measurable_tprod_elim' [decidable_eq δ] {l : list δ} (h : ∀ i, i ∈ l) :
measurable (tprod.elim' h : tprod π l → Π i, π i) :=
measurable_pi_lambda _ (λ i, measurable_tprod_elim (h i))
lemma measurable_set.tprod (l : list δ) {s : ∀ i, set (π i)} (hs : ∀ i, measurable_set (s i)) :
measurable_set (set.tprod l s) :=
by { induction l with i l ih, exact measurable_set.univ, exact (hs i).prod ih }
end tprod
instance {α β} [m₁ : measurable_space α] [m₂ : measurable_space β] : measurable_space (α ⊕ β) :=
m₁.map sum.inl ⊓ m₂.map sum.inr
section sum
@[measurability] lemma measurable_inl [measurable_space α] [measurable_space β] :
measurable (@sum.inl α β) :=
measurable.of_le_map inf_le_left
@[measurability] lemma measurable_inr [measurable_space α] [measurable_space β] :
measurable (@sum.inr α β) :=
measurable.of_le_map inf_le_right
variables {m : measurable_space α} {mβ : measurable_space β}
include m mβ
lemma measurable_sum {mγ : measurable_space γ} {f : α ⊕ β → γ}
(hl : measurable (f ∘ sum.inl)) (hr : measurable (f ∘ sum.inr)) : measurable f :=
measurable.of_comap_le $ le_inf
(measurable_space.comap_le_iff_le_map.2 $ hl)
(measurable_space.comap_le_iff_le_map.2 $ hr)
@[measurability]
lemma measurable.sum_elim {mγ : measurable_space γ} {f : α → γ} {g : β → γ}
(hf : measurable f) (hg : measurable g) :
measurable (sum.elim f g) :=
measurable_sum hf hg
lemma measurable_set.inl_image {s : set α} (hs : measurable_set s) :
measurable_set (sum.inl '' s : set (α ⊕ β)) :=
⟨show measurable_set (sum.inl ⁻¹' _), by { rwa [preimage_image_eq], exact (λ a b, sum.inl.inj) },
have sum.inr ⁻¹' (sum.inl '' s : set (α ⊕ β)) = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty $ assume x ⟨y, hy, eq⟩, by contradiction,
show measurable_set (sum.inr ⁻¹' _), by { rw [this], exact measurable_set.empty }⟩
lemma measurable_set_inr_image {s : set β} (hs : measurable_set s) :
measurable_set (sum.inr '' s : set (α ⊕ β)) :=
⟨ have sum.inl ⁻¹' (sum.inr '' s : set (α ⊕ β)) = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty $ assume x ⟨y, hy, eq⟩, by contradiction,
show measurable_set (sum.inl ⁻¹' _), by { rw [this], exact measurable_set.empty },
show measurable_set (sum.inr ⁻¹' _), by { rwa [preimage_image_eq], exact λ a b, sum.inr.inj }⟩
omit m
lemma measurable_set_range_inl [measurable_space α] :
measurable_set (range sum.inl : set (α ⊕ β)) :=
by { rw [← image_univ], exact measurable_set.univ.inl_image }
lemma measurable_set_range_inr [measurable_space α] :
measurable_set (range sum.inr : set (α ⊕ β)) :=
by { rw [← image_univ], exact measurable_set_inr_image measurable_set.univ }
end sum
instance {α} {β : α → Type*} [m : Πa, measurable_space (β a)] : measurable_space (sigma β) :=
⨅a, (m a).map (sigma.mk a)
end constructions
/-- A map `f : α → β` is called a *measurable embedding* if it is injective, measurable, and sends
measurable sets to measurable sets. The latter assumption can be replaced with “`f` has measurable
inverse `g : range f → α`”, see `measurable_embedding.measurable_range_splitting`,
`measurable_embedding.of_measurable_inverse_range`, and
`measurable_embedding.of_measurable_inverse`.
One more interpretation: `f` is a measurable embedding if it defines a measurable equivalence to its
range and the range is a measurable set. One implication is formalized as
`measurable_embedding.equiv_range`; the other one follows from
`measurable_equiv.measurable_embedding`, `measurable_embedding.subtype_coe`, and
`measurable_embedding.comp`. -/
@[protect_proj]
structure measurable_embedding {α β : Type*} [measurable_space α] [measurable_space β] (f : α → β) :
Prop :=
(injective : injective f)
(measurable : measurable f)
(measurable_set_image' : ∀ ⦃s⦄, measurable_set s → measurable_set (f '' s))
namespace measurable_embedding
variables {mα : measurable_space α} [measurable_space β] [measurable_space γ]
{f : α → β} {g : β → γ}
include mα
lemma measurable_set_image (hf : measurable_embedding f) {s : set α} :
measurable_set (f '' s) ↔ measurable_set s :=
⟨λ h, by simpa only [hf.injective.preimage_image] using hf.measurable h,
λ h, hf.measurable_set_image' h⟩
lemma id : measurable_embedding (id : α → α) :=
⟨injective_id, measurable_id, λ s hs, by rwa image_id⟩
lemma comp (hg : measurable_embedding g) (hf : measurable_embedding f) :
measurable_embedding (g ∘ f) :=
⟨hg.injective.comp hf.injective, hg.measurable.comp hf.measurable,
λ s hs, by rwa [← image_image, hg.measurable_set_image, hf.measurable_set_image]⟩
lemma subtype_coe {s : set α} (hs : measurable_set s) : measurable_embedding (coe : s → α) :=
{ injective := subtype.coe_injective,
measurable := measurable_subtype_coe,
measurable_set_image' := λ _, measurable_set.subtype_image hs }
lemma measurable_set_range (hf : measurable_embedding f) : measurable_set (range f) :=
by { rw ← image_univ, exact hf.measurable_set_image' measurable_set.univ }
lemma measurable_set_preimage (hf : measurable_embedding f) {s : set β} :
measurable_set (f ⁻¹' s) ↔ measurable_set (s ∩ range f) :=
by rw [← image_preimage_eq_inter_range, hf.measurable_set_image]
lemma measurable_range_splitting (hf : measurable_embedding f) :
measurable (range_splitting f) :=
λ s hs, by rwa [preimage_range_splitting hf.injective,
← (subtype_coe hf.measurable_set_range).measurable_set_image, ← image_comp,
coe_comp_range_factorization, hf.measurable_set_image]
lemma measurable_extend (hf : measurable_embedding f) {g : α → γ} {g' : β → γ}
(hg : measurable g) (hg' : measurable g') :
measurable (extend f g g') :=
begin
refine measurable_of_restrict_of_restrict_compl hf.measurable_set_range _ _,
{ rw restrict_extend_range,
simpa only [range_splitting] using hg.comp hf.measurable_range_splitting },
{ rw restrict_extend_compl_range, exact hg'.comp measurable_subtype_coe }
end
lemma exists_measurable_extend (hf : measurable_embedding f) {g : α → γ} (hg : measurable g)
(hne : β → nonempty γ) :
∃ g' : β → γ, measurable g' ∧ g' ∘ f = g :=
⟨extend f g (λ x, classical.choice (hne x)),
hf.measurable_extend hg (measurable_const' $ λ _ _, rfl),
funext $ λ x, extend_apply hf.injective _ _ _⟩
lemma measurable_comp_iff (hg : measurable_embedding g) : measurable (g ∘ f) ↔ measurable f :=
begin
refine ⟨λ H, _, hg.measurable.comp⟩,
suffices : measurable ((range_splitting g ∘ range_factorization g) ∘ f),
by rwa [(right_inverse_range_splitting hg.injective).comp_eq_id] at this,
exact hg.measurable_range_splitting.comp H.subtype_mk
end
end measurable_embedding
lemma measurable_set.exists_measurable_proj {m : measurable_space α} {s : set α}
(hs : measurable_set s) (hne : s.nonempty) : ∃ f : α → s, measurable f ∧ ∀ x : s, f x = x :=
let ⟨f, hfm, hf⟩ := (measurable_embedding.subtype_coe hs).exists_measurable_extend
measurable_id (λ _, hne.to_subtype)
in ⟨f, hfm, congr_fun hf⟩
/-- Equivalences between measurable spaces. Main application is the simplification of measurability
statements along measurable equivalences. -/
structure measurable_equiv (α β : Type*) [measurable_space α] [measurable_space β] extends α ≃ β :=
(measurable_to_fun : measurable to_equiv)
(measurable_inv_fun : measurable to_equiv.symm)
infix ` ≃ᵐ `:25 := measurable_equiv
namespace measurable_equiv
variables (α β) [measurable_space α] [measurable_space β] [measurable_space γ] [measurable_space δ]
instance : has_coe_to_fun (α ≃ᵐ β) (λ _, α → β) := ⟨λ e, e.to_fun⟩
variables {α β}
@[simp] lemma coe_to_equiv (e : α ≃ᵐ β) : (e.to_equiv : α → β) = e := rfl
@[measurability]
protected lemma measurable (e : α ≃ᵐ β) : measurable (e : α → β) :=
e.measurable_to_fun
@[simp] lemma coe_mk (e : α ≃ β) (h1 : measurable e) (h2 : measurable e.symm) :
((⟨e, h1, h2⟩ : α ≃ᵐ β) : α → β) = e := rfl
/-- Any measurable space is equivalent to itself. -/
def refl (α : Type*) [measurable_space α] : α ≃ᵐ α :=
{ to_equiv := equiv.refl α,
measurable_to_fun := measurable_id, measurable_inv_fun := measurable_id }
instance : inhabited (α ≃ᵐ α) := ⟨refl α⟩
/-- The composition of equivalences between measurable spaces. -/
def trans (ab : α ≃ᵐ β) (bc : β ≃ᵐ γ) :
α ≃ᵐ γ :=
{ to_equiv := ab.to_equiv.trans bc.to_equiv,
measurable_to_fun := bc.measurable_to_fun.comp ab.measurable_to_fun,
measurable_inv_fun := ab.measurable_inv_fun.comp bc.measurable_inv_fun }
/-- The inverse of an equivalence between measurable spaces. -/
def symm (ab : α ≃ᵐ β) : β ≃ᵐ α :=
{ to_equiv := ab.to_equiv.symm,
measurable_to_fun := ab.measurable_inv_fun,
measurable_inv_fun := ab.measurable_to_fun }
@[simp] lemma coe_to_equiv_symm (e : α ≃ᵐ β) : (e.to_equiv.symm : β → α) = e.symm := rfl
/-- See Note [custom simps projection]. We need to specify this projection explicitly in this case,
because it is a composition of multiple projections. -/
def simps.apply (h : α ≃ᵐ β) : α → β := h
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def simps.symm_apply (h : α ≃ᵐ β) : β → α := h.symm
initialize_simps_projections measurable_equiv
(to_equiv_to_fun → apply, to_equiv_inv_fun → symm_apply)
lemma to_equiv_injective : injective (to_equiv : (α ≃ᵐ β) → (α ≃ β)) :=
by { rintro ⟨e₁, _, _⟩ ⟨e₂, _, _⟩ (rfl : e₁ = e₂), refl }
@[ext] lemma ext {e₁ e₂ : α ≃ᵐ β} (h : (e₁ : α → β) = e₂) : e₁ = e₂ :=
to_equiv_injective $ equiv.coe_fn_injective h
@[simp] lemma symm_mk (e : α ≃ β) (h1 : measurable e) (h2 : measurable e.symm) :
(⟨e, h1, h2⟩ : α ≃ᵐ β).symm = ⟨e.symm, h2, h1⟩ := rfl
attribute [simps apply to_equiv] trans refl
@[simp] lemma symm_refl (α : Type*) [measurable_space α] : (refl α).symm = refl α := rfl
@[simp] theorem symm_comp_self (e : α ≃ᵐ β) : e.symm ∘ e = id := funext e.left_inv
@[simp] theorem self_comp_symm (e : α ≃ᵐ β) : e ∘ e.symm = id := funext e.right_inv
@[simp] theorem apply_symm_apply (e : α ≃ᵐ β) (y : β) : e (e.symm y) = y := e.right_inv y
@[simp] theorem symm_apply_apply (e : α ≃ᵐ β) (x : α) : e.symm (e x) = x := e.left_inv x
@[simp] theorem symm_trans_self (e : α ≃ᵐ β) : e.symm.trans e = refl β :=
ext e.self_comp_symm
@[simp] theorem self_trans_symm (e : α ≃ᵐ β) : e.trans e.symm = refl α :=
ext e.symm_comp_self
protected theorem surjective (e : α ≃ᵐ β) : surjective e := e.to_equiv.surjective
protected theorem bijective (e : α ≃ᵐ β) : bijective e := e.to_equiv.bijective
protected theorem injective (e : α ≃ᵐ β) : injective e := e.to_equiv.injective
@[simp] theorem symm_preimage_preimage (e : α ≃ᵐ β) (s : set β) : e.symm ⁻¹' (e ⁻¹' s) = s :=
e.to_equiv.symm_preimage_preimage s
theorem image_eq_preimage (e : α ≃ᵐ β) (s : set α) : e '' s = e.symm ⁻¹' s :=
e.to_equiv.image_eq_preimage s
@[simp] theorem measurable_set_preimage (e : α ≃ᵐ β) {s : set β} :
measurable_set (e ⁻¹' s) ↔ measurable_set s :=
⟨λ h, by simpa only [symm_preimage_preimage] using e.symm.measurable h, λ h, e.measurable h⟩
@[simp] theorem measurable_set_image (e : α ≃ᵐ β) {s : set α} :
measurable_set (e '' s) ↔ measurable_set s :=
by rw [image_eq_preimage, measurable_set_preimage]
/-- A measurable equivalence is a measurable embedding. -/
protected lemma measurable_embedding (e : α ≃ᵐ β) : measurable_embedding e :=
{ injective := e.injective,
measurable := e.measurable,
measurable_set_image' := λ s, e.measurable_set_image.2 }
/-- Equal measurable spaces are equivalent. -/
protected def cast {α β} [i₁ : measurable_space α] [i₂ : measurable_space β]
(h : α = β) (hi : i₁ == i₂) : α ≃ᵐ β :=
{ to_equiv := equiv.cast h,
measurable_to_fun := by { substI h, substI hi, exact measurable_id },
measurable_inv_fun := by { substI h, substI hi, exact measurable_id }}
protected lemma measurable_comp_iff {f : β → γ} (e : α ≃ᵐ β) :
measurable (f ∘ e) ↔ measurable f :=
iff.intro
(assume hfe,
have measurable (f ∘ (e.symm.trans e).to_equiv) := hfe.comp e.symm.measurable,
by rwa [coe_to_equiv, symm_trans_self] at this)
(λ h, h.comp e.measurable)
/-- Any two types with unique elements are measurably equivalent. -/
def of_unique_of_unique (α β : Type*) [measurable_space α] [measurable_space β]
[unique α] [unique β] : α ≃ᵐ β :=
{ to_equiv := equiv_of_unique_of_unique,
measurable_to_fun := subsingleton.measurable,
measurable_inv_fun := subsingleton.measurable }
/-- Products of equivalent measurable spaces are equivalent. -/
def prod_congr (ab : α ≃ᵐ β) (cd : γ ≃ᵐ δ) : α × γ ≃ᵐ β × δ :=
{ to_equiv := prod_congr ab.to_equiv cd.to_equiv,
measurable_to_fun := (ab.measurable_to_fun.comp measurable_id.fst).prod_mk
(cd.measurable_to_fun.comp measurable_id.snd),
measurable_inv_fun := (ab.measurable_inv_fun.comp measurable_id.fst).prod_mk
(cd.measurable_inv_fun.comp measurable_id.snd) }
/-- Products of measurable spaces are symmetric. -/
def prod_comm : α × β ≃ᵐ β × α :=
{ to_equiv := prod_comm α β,
measurable_to_fun := measurable_id.snd.prod_mk measurable_id.fst,
measurable_inv_fun := measurable_id.snd.prod_mk measurable_id.fst }
/-- Products of measurable spaces are associative. -/
def prod_assoc : (α × β) × γ ≃ᵐ α × (β × γ) :=
{ to_equiv := prod_assoc α β γ,
measurable_to_fun := measurable_fst.fst.prod_mk $ measurable_fst.snd.prod_mk measurable_snd,
measurable_inv_fun := (measurable_fst.prod_mk measurable_snd.fst).prod_mk measurable_snd.snd }
/-- Sums of measurable spaces are symmetric. -/
def sum_congr (ab : α ≃ᵐ β) (cd : γ ≃ᵐ δ) : α ⊕ γ ≃ᵐ β ⊕ δ :=
{ to_equiv := sum_congr ab.to_equiv cd.to_equiv,
measurable_to_fun :=
begin
cases ab with ab' abm, cases ab', cases cd with cd' cdm, cases cd',
refine measurable_sum (measurable_inl.comp abm) (measurable_inr.comp cdm)
end,
measurable_inv_fun :=
begin
cases ab with ab' _ abm, cases ab', cases cd with cd' _ cdm, cases cd',
refine measurable_sum (measurable_inl.comp abm) (measurable_inr.comp cdm)
end }
/-- `s ×ˢ t ≃ (s × t)` as measurable spaces. -/
def set.prod (s : set α) (t : set β) : ↥(s ×ˢ t) ≃ᵐ s × t :=
{ to_equiv := equiv.set.prod s t,
measurable_to_fun := measurable_id.subtype_coe.fst.subtype_mk.prod_mk
measurable_id.subtype_coe.snd.subtype_mk,
measurable_inv_fun := measurable.subtype_mk $ measurable_id.fst.subtype_coe.prod_mk
measurable_id.snd.subtype_coe }
/-- `univ α ≃ α` as measurable spaces. -/
def set.univ (α : Type*) [measurable_space α] : (univ : set α) ≃ᵐ α :=
{ to_equiv := equiv.set.univ α,
measurable_to_fun := measurable_id.subtype_coe,
measurable_inv_fun := measurable_id.subtype_mk }
/-- `{a} ≃ unit` as measurable spaces. -/
def set.singleton (a : α) : ({a} : set α) ≃ᵐ unit :=
{ to_equiv := equiv.set.singleton a,
measurable_to_fun := measurable_const,
measurable_inv_fun := measurable_const }
/-- A set is equivalent to its image under a function `f` as measurable spaces,
if `f` is an injective measurable function that sends measurable sets to measurable sets. -/
noncomputable def set.image (f : α → β) (s : set α) (hf : injective f)
(hfm : measurable f) (hfi : ∀ s, measurable_set s → measurable_set (f '' s)) : s ≃ᵐ (f '' s) :=
{ to_equiv := equiv.set.image f s hf,
measurable_to_fun := (hfm.comp measurable_id.subtype_coe).subtype_mk,
measurable_inv_fun :=
begin
rintro t ⟨u, hu, rfl⟩, simp [preimage_preimage, set.image_symm_preimage hf],
exact measurable_subtype_coe (hfi u hu)
end }
/-- The domain of `f` is equivalent to its range as measurable spaces,
if `f` is an injective measurable function that sends measurable sets to measurable sets. -/
noncomputable def set.range (f : α → β) (hf : injective f) (hfm : measurable f)
(hfi : ∀ s, measurable_set s → measurable_set (f '' s)) :
α ≃ᵐ (range f) :=
(measurable_equiv.set.univ _).symm.trans $
(measurable_equiv.set.image f univ hf hfm hfi).trans $
measurable_equiv.cast (by rw image_univ) (by rw image_univ)
/-- `α` is equivalent to its image in `α ⊕ β` as measurable spaces. -/
def set.range_inl : (range sum.inl : set (α ⊕ β)) ≃ᵐ α :=
{ to_fun := λ ab, match ab with
| ⟨sum.inl a, _⟩ := a
| ⟨sum.inr b, p⟩ := have false, by { cases p, contradiction }, this.elim
end,
inv_fun := λ a, ⟨sum.inl a, a, rfl⟩,
left_inv := by { rintro ⟨ab, a, rfl⟩, refl },
right_inv := assume a, rfl,
measurable_to_fun := assume s (hs : measurable_set s),
begin
refine ⟨_, hs.inl_image, set.ext _⟩,
rintros ⟨ab, a, rfl⟩,
simp [set.range_inl._match_1]
end,
measurable_inv_fun := measurable.subtype_mk measurable_inl }
/-- `β` is equivalent to its image in `α ⊕ β` as measurable spaces. -/
def set.range_inr : (range sum.inr : set (α ⊕ β)) ≃ᵐ β :=
{ to_fun := λ ab, match ab with
| ⟨sum.inr b, _⟩ := b
| ⟨sum.inl a, p⟩ := have false, by { cases p, contradiction }, this.elim
end,
inv_fun := λ b, ⟨sum.inr b, b, rfl⟩,
left_inv := by { rintro ⟨ab, b, rfl⟩, refl },
right_inv := assume b, rfl,
measurable_to_fun := assume s (hs : measurable_set s),
begin
refine ⟨_, measurable_set_inr_image hs, set.ext _⟩,
rintros ⟨ab, b, rfl⟩,
simp [set.range_inr._match_1]
end,
measurable_inv_fun := measurable.subtype_mk measurable_inr }
/-- Products distribute over sums (on the right) as measurable spaces. -/
def sum_prod_distrib (α β γ) [measurable_space α] [measurable_space β] [measurable_space γ] :
(α ⊕ β) × γ ≃ᵐ (α × γ) ⊕ (β × γ) :=
{ to_equiv := sum_prod_distrib α β γ,
measurable_to_fun :=
begin
refine measurable_of_measurable_union_cover
(range sum.inl ×ˢ (univ : set γ))
(range sum.inr ×ˢ (univ : set γ))
(measurable_set_range_inl.prod measurable_set.univ)
(measurable_set_range_inr.prod measurable_set.univ)
(by { rintro ⟨a|b, c⟩; simp [set.prod_eq] })
_
_,
{ refine (set.prod (range sum.inl) univ).symm.measurable_comp_iff.1 _,
refine (prod_congr set.range_inl (set.univ _)).symm.measurable_comp_iff.1 _,
dsimp [(∘)],
convert measurable_inl,
ext ⟨a, c⟩, refl },
{ refine (set.prod (range sum.inr) univ).symm.measurable_comp_iff.1 _,
refine (prod_congr set.range_inr (set.univ _)).symm.measurable_comp_iff.1 _,
dsimp [(∘)],
convert measurable_inr,
ext ⟨b, c⟩, refl }
end,
measurable_inv_fun :=
measurable_sum
((measurable_inl.comp measurable_fst).prod_mk measurable_snd)
((measurable_inr.comp measurable_fst).prod_mk measurable_snd) }
/-- Products distribute over sums (on the left) as measurable spaces. -/
def prod_sum_distrib (α β γ) [measurable_space α] [measurable_space β] [measurable_space γ] :
α × (β ⊕ γ) ≃ᵐ (α × β) ⊕ (α × γ) :=
prod_comm.trans $ (sum_prod_distrib _ _ _).trans $ sum_congr prod_comm prod_comm
/-- Products distribute over sums as measurable spaces. -/
def sum_prod_sum (α β γ δ)
[measurable_space α] [measurable_space β] [measurable_space γ] [measurable_space δ] :
(α ⊕ β) × (γ ⊕ δ) ≃ᵐ ((α × γ) ⊕ (α × δ)) ⊕ ((β × γ) ⊕ (β × δ)) :=
(sum_prod_distrib _ _ _).trans $ sum_congr (prod_sum_distrib _ _ _) (prod_sum_distrib _ _ _)
variables {π π' : δ' → Type*} [∀ x, measurable_space (π x)] [∀ x, measurable_space (π' x)]
/-- A family of measurable equivalences `Π a, β₁ a ≃ᵐ β₂ a` generates a measurable equivalence
between `Π a, β₁ a` and `Π a, β₂ a`. -/
def Pi_congr_right (e : Π a, π a ≃ᵐ π' a) : (Π a, π a) ≃ᵐ (Π a, π' a) :=
{ to_equiv := Pi_congr_right (λ a, (e a).to_equiv),
measurable_to_fun :=
measurable_pi_lambda _ (λ i, (e i).measurable_to_fun.comp (measurable_pi_apply i)),
measurable_inv_fun :=
measurable_pi_lambda _ (λ i, (e i).measurable_inv_fun.comp (measurable_pi_apply i)) }
/-- Pi-types are measurably equivalent to iterated products. -/
@[simps {fully_applied := ff}]
def pi_measurable_equiv_tprod [decidable_eq δ']
{l : list δ'} (hnd : l.nodup) (h : ∀ i, i ∈ l) :
(Π i, π i) ≃ᵐ list.tprod π l :=
{ to_equiv := list.tprod.pi_equiv_tprod hnd h,
measurable_to_fun := measurable_tprod_mk l,
measurable_inv_fun := measurable_tprod_elim' h }
/-- If `α` has a unique term, then the type of function `α → β` is measurably equivalent to `β`. -/
@[simps {fully_applied := ff}] def fun_unique (α β : Type*) [unique α] [measurable_space β] :
(α → β) ≃ᵐ β :=
{ to_equiv := equiv.fun_unique α β,
measurable_to_fun := measurable_pi_apply _,
measurable_inv_fun := measurable_pi_iff.2 $ λ b, measurable_id }
/-- The space `Π i : fin 2, α i` is measurably equivalent to `α 0 × α 1`. -/
@[simps {fully_applied := ff}] def pi_fin_two (α : fin 2 → Type*) [∀ i, measurable_space (α i)] :
(Π i, α i) ≃ᵐ α 0 × α 1 :=
{ to_equiv := pi_fin_two_equiv α,
measurable_to_fun := measurable.prod (measurable_pi_apply _) (measurable_pi_apply _),
measurable_inv_fun := measurable_pi_iff.2 $
fin.forall_fin_two.2 ⟨measurable_fst, measurable_snd⟩ }
/-- The space `fin 2 → α` is measurably equivalent to `α × α`. -/
@[simps {fully_applied := ff}] def fin_two_arrow : (fin 2 → α) ≃ᵐ α × α := pi_fin_two (λ _, α)
/-- Measurable equivalence between `Π j : fin (n + 1), α j` and
`α i × Π j : fin n, α (fin.succ_above i j)`. -/
@[simps {fully_applied := ff}]
def pi_fin_succ_above_equiv {n : ℕ} (α : fin (n + 1) → Type*) [Π i, measurable_space (α i)]
(i : fin (n + 1)) :
(Π j, α j) ≃ᵐ α i × (Π j, α (i.succ_above j)) :=
{ to_equiv := pi_fin_succ_above_equiv α i,
measurable_to_fun := (measurable_pi_apply i).prod_mk $ measurable_pi_iff.2 $
λ j, measurable_pi_apply _,
measurable_inv_fun := by simp [measurable_pi_iff, i.forall_iff_succ_above, measurable_fst,
(measurable_pi_apply _).comp measurable_snd] }
variable (π)
/-- Measurable equivalence between (dependent) functions on a type and pairs of functions on
`{i // p i}` and `{i // ¬p i}`. See also `equiv.pi_equiv_pi_subtype_prod`. -/
@[simps {fully_applied := ff}]
def pi_equiv_pi_subtype_prod (p : δ' → Prop) [decidable_pred p] :
(Π i, π i) ≃ᵐ ((Π i : subtype p, π i) × (Π i : {i // ¬p i}, π i)) :=
{ to_equiv := pi_equiv_pi_subtype_prod p π,
measurable_to_fun := measurable_pi_equiv_pi_subtype_prod π p,
measurable_inv_fun := measurable_pi_equiv_pi_subtype_prod_symm π p }
end measurable_equiv
namespace measurable_embedding
variables [measurable_space α] [measurable_space β] [measurable_space γ] {f : α → β}
/-- A measurable embedding defines a measurable equivalence between its domain
and its range. -/
noncomputable def equiv_range (f : α → β) (hf : measurable_embedding f) :
α ≃ᵐ range f :=
{ to_equiv := equiv.of_injective f hf.injective,
measurable_to_fun := hf.measurable.subtype_mk,
measurable_inv_fun :=
by { rw coe_of_injective_symm, exact hf.measurable_range_splitting } }
lemma of_measurable_inverse_on_range {g : range f → α} (hf₁ : measurable f)
(hf₂ : measurable_set (range f)) (hg : measurable g)
(H : left_inverse g (range_factorization f)) : measurable_embedding f :=
begin
set e : α ≃ᵐ range f :=
⟨⟨range_factorization f, g, H, H.right_inverse_of_surjective surjective_onto_range⟩,
hf₁.subtype_mk, hg⟩,
exact (measurable_embedding.subtype_coe hf₂).comp e.measurable_embedding
end
lemma of_measurable_inverse {g : β → α} (hf₁ : measurable f)
(hf₂ : measurable_set (range f)) (hg : measurable g)
(H : left_inverse g f) : measurable_embedding f :=
of_measurable_inverse_on_range hf₁ hf₂ (hg.comp measurable_subtype_coe) H
end measurable_embedding
namespace filter
variables [measurable_space α]
/-- A filter `f` is measurably generates if each `s ∈ f` includes a measurable `t ∈ f`. -/
class is_measurably_generated (f : filter α) : Prop :=
(exists_measurable_subset : ∀ ⦃s⦄, s ∈ f → ∃ t ∈ f, measurable_set t ∧ t ⊆ s)
instance is_measurably_generated_bot : is_measurably_generated (⊥ : filter α) :=
⟨λ _ _, ⟨∅, mem_bot, measurable_set.empty, empty_subset _⟩⟩
instance is_measurably_generated_top : is_measurably_generated (⊤ : filter α) :=
⟨λ s hs, ⟨univ, univ_mem, measurable_set.univ, λ x _, hs x⟩⟩
lemma eventually.exists_measurable_mem {f : filter α} [is_measurably_generated f]
{p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ s ∈ f, measurable_set s ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, p x :=
is_measurably_generated.exists_measurable_subset h
lemma eventually.exists_measurable_mem_of_small_sets {f : filter α} [is_measurably_generated f]
{p : set α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ s in f.small_sets, p s) :
∃ s ∈ f, measurable_set s ∧ p s :=
let ⟨s, hsf, hs⟩ := eventually_small_sets.1 h,
⟨t, htf, htm, hts⟩ := is_measurably_generated.exists_measurable_subset hsf
in ⟨t, htf, htm, hs t hts⟩
instance inf_is_measurably_generated (f g : filter α) [is_measurably_generated f]
[is_measurably_generated g] :
is_measurably_generated (f ⊓ g) :=
begin
refine ⟨_⟩,
rintros t ⟨sf, hsf, sg, hsg, rfl⟩,
rcases is_measurably_generated.exists_measurable_subset hsf with ⟨s'f, hs'f, hmf, hs'sf⟩,
rcases is_measurably_generated.exists_measurable_subset hsg with ⟨s'g, hs'g, hmg, hs'sg⟩,
refine ⟨s'f ∩ s'g, inter_mem_inf hs'f hs'g, hmf.inter hmg, _⟩,
exact inter_subset_inter hs'sf hs'sg
end
lemma principal_is_measurably_generated_iff {s : set α} :
is_measurably_generated (𝓟 s) ↔ measurable_set s :=
begin
refine ⟨_, λ hs, ⟨λ t ht, ⟨s, mem_principal_self s, hs, ht⟩⟩⟩,
rintros ⟨hs⟩,
rcases hs (mem_principal_self s) with ⟨t, ht, htm, hts⟩,
have : t = s := subset.antisymm hts ht,
rwa ← this
end
alias principal_is_measurably_generated_iff ↔
_ measurable_set.principal_is_measurably_generated
instance infi_is_measurably_generated {f : ι → filter α} [∀ i, is_measurably_generated (f i)] :
is_measurably_generated (⨅ i, f i) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ s hs, _⟩,
rw [← equiv.plift.surjective.infi_comp, mem_infi] at hs,
rcases hs with ⟨t, ht, ⟨V, hVf, rfl⟩⟩,
choose U hUf hU using λ i, is_measurably_generated.exists_measurable_subset (hVf i),
refine ⟨⋂ i : t, U i, _, _, _⟩,
{ rw [← equiv.plift.surjective.infi_comp, mem_infi],
refine ⟨t, ht, U, hUf, rfl⟩ },
{ haveI := ht.countable.to_encodable,
exact measurable_set.Inter (λ i, (hU i).1) },
{ exact Inter_mono (λ i, (hU i).2) }
end
end filter
/-- We say that a collection of sets is countably spanning if a countable subset spans the
whole type. This is a useful condition in various parts of measure theory. For example, it is
a needed condition to show that the product of two collections generate the product sigma algebra,
see `generate_from_prod_eq`. -/
def is_countably_spanning (C : set (set α)) : Prop :=
∃ (s : ℕ → set α), (∀ n, s n ∈ C) ∧ (⋃ n, s n) = univ
lemma is_countably_spanning_measurable_set [measurable_space α] :
is_countably_spanning {s : set α | measurable_set s} :=
⟨λ _, univ, λ _, measurable_set.univ, Union_const _⟩
namespace measurable_set
/-!
### Typeclasses on `subtype measurable_set`
-/
variables [measurable_space α]
instance : has_mem α (subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) :=
⟨λ a s, a ∈ (s : set α)⟩
@[simp] lemma mem_coe (a : α) (s : subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) :
a ∈ (s : set α) ↔ a ∈ s := iff.rfl
instance : has_emptyc (subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) :=
⟨⟨∅, measurable_set.empty⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_empty : ↑(∅ : subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) = (∅ : set α) := rfl
instance [measurable_singleton_class α] : has_insert α (subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) :=
⟨λ a s, ⟨has_insert.insert a s, s.prop.insert a⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_insert [measurable_singleton_class α] (a : α)
(s : subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) :
↑(has_insert.insert a s) = (has_insert.insert a s : set α) := rfl
instance : has_compl (subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) :=
⟨λ x, ⟨xᶜ, x.prop.compl⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_compl (s : subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) : ↑(sᶜ) = (sᶜ : set α) := rfl
instance : has_union (subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) :=
⟨λ x y, ⟨x ∪ y, x.prop.union y.prop⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_union (s t : subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) :
↑(s ∪ t) = (s ∪ t : set α) := rfl
instance : has_inter (subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) :=
⟨λ x y, ⟨x ∩ y, x.prop.inter y.prop⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_inter (s t : subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) :
↑(s ∩ t) = (s ∩ t : set α) := rfl
instance : has_sdiff (subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) :=
⟨λ x y, ⟨x \ y, x.prop.diff y.prop⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_sdiff (s t : subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) :
↑(s \ t) = (s \ t : set α) := rfl
instance : has_bot (subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) :=
⟨⟨⊥, measurable_set.empty⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_bot : ↑(⊥ : subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) = (⊥ : set α) := rfl
instance : has_top (subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) :=
⟨⟨⊤, measurable_set.univ⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_top : ↑(⊤ : subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) = (⊤ : set α) := rfl
instance : partial_order (subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) :=
partial_order.lift _ subtype.coe_injective
instance : distrib_lattice (subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) :=
{ sup := (∪),
le_sup_left := λ a b, show (a : set α) ≤ a ⊔ b, from le_sup_left,
le_sup_right := λ a b, show (b : set α) ≤ a ⊔ b, from le_sup_right,
sup_le := λ a b c ha hb, show (a ⊔ b : set α) ≤ c, from sup_le ha hb,
inf := (∩),
inf_le_left := λ a b, show (a ⊓ b : set α) ≤ a, from inf_le_left,
inf_le_right := λ a b, show (a ⊓ b : set α) ≤ b, from inf_le_right,
le_inf := λ a b c ha hb, show (a : set α) ≤ b ⊓ c, from le_inf ha hb,
le_sup_inf := λ x y z, show ((x ⊔ y) ⊓ (x ⊔ z) : set α) ≤ x ⊔ y ⊓ z, from le_sup_inf,
.. measurable_set.subtype.partial_order }
instance : bounded_order (subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) :=
{ top := ⊤,
le_top := λ a, show (a : set α) ≤ ⊤, from le_top,
bot := ⊥,
bot_le := λ a, show (⊥ : set α) ≤ a, from bot_le }
instance : boolean_algebra (subtype (measurable_set : set α → Prop)) :=
{ sdiff := (\),
sup_inf_sdiff := λ a b, subtype.eq $ sup_inf_sdiff a b,
inf_inf_sdiff := λ a b, subtype.eq $ inf_inf_sdiff a b,
compl := has_compl.compl,
inf_compl_le_bot := λ a, boolean_algebra.inf_compl_le_bot (a : set α),
top_le_sup_compl := λ a, boolean_algebra.top_le_sup_compl (a : set α),
sdiff_eq := λ a b, subtype.eq $ sdiff_eq,
.. measurable_set.subtype.bounded_order,
.. measurable_set.subtype.distrib_lattice }
end measurable_set
|
921391981a0c1ee76a96794ed8c1e1795fc1206f | ed27983dd289b3bcad416f0b1927105d6ef19db8 | /src/exam1/lin2k_test.lean | 28fde2181ddb4a7b60e4aa03f94ed1bbeae9a024 | [] | no_license | liuxin-James/complogic-s21 | 0d55b76dbe25024473d31d98b5b83655c365f811 | 13e03e0114626643b44015c654151fb651603486 | refs/heads/master | 1,681,109,264,463 | 1,618,848,261,000 | 1,618,848,261,000 | 337,599,491 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,613,141,619,000 | 1,612,925,555,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,163 | lean | import data.real.basic
import exam1.lin2k
-- Let's work with rational number field
abbreviation K := ℚ
-- Here are nice abbreviations for types
abbreviation scalr := K
abbreviation vectr := K × K
/-
1A. [10 points]
Declare v1, v2, and v3 to be of type
vectr with values (4,6), (-6,2), and
(3, -7), respectively.
-/
-- HERE
def v1: vectr := ⟨4,6⟩
def v2: vectr := ⟨-6,2⟩
def v3: vectr := ⟨3, -7⟩
/-
1B. [10 points]
Now define v4, *using the vector
space operators, + and •, to be
the following "linear combination"
of vectors: twice v1 plus negative
v2 plus v3. The negative of a vector
is just -1 (in the field K) times
the vector. Write -1 as (-1:K), as
otherwise Lean will treat it as the
integer -1. (Note that subtraction
of vectors, v2 - v1 is defined as
v2 + (-1:K) • v1.)
-/
def v4: vectr := 2 • v1 + (-1:K) • v2 + v3
-- HERE
/-
Compute the correct answer by hand
here, showing your work, and check
that eval is producing the correct
answer.
-- HERE
-/
--(17,3)
#eval v4
/-
1C. [10 points]
On a piece of paper, draw a picture
of the preceding computation. Make a
Cartesian plane with x and y axes.
Draw each vector, v1, v2, v3, as an
arrow from the origin to the point
designated by the coordinates of the
vector.
Scalar multiplication stretches or
shrinks a vector by a given factor.
Show each of the scaled vectors in
your picture: 2 • v1 and (-1:K) • v2.
Finally vector addition in graphical
terms works by putting the tail (non
arrow) end of one vector at the head
of the other then drawing the vector
from the tail of the first to the head
of the second. Draw the vectors that
illustrate the sum, 2 • v1 + (-1:K) • v2,
and then the sum of that with v3. You
should come out with the same answer
as before. Take a picture of your
drawing and upload it with your test.
-/
-- HERE
/-
2. [15 points]
Many sets can be viewed as fields. For
example, the integers mod p, where p is
any prime, has the structure of a field
under the usual operations of addition
and multiplication mod p.
In case you forget about the integers
mod n, it can be understood as the set
of natural numbers from 0 to n-1, where
addition and multiplication wrap around.
For example, the integers mod 5 is the
set {0, 1, 2, 3, 4}. Now 2 + 2 = 4 but
2 + 3 = 5 = 0. It's "clock arithmetic,"
as they say. Similarly 2 * 2 = 4 but
2 * 3 = 6 = 5 + 1 = 0 + 1 = 1.
To show informally that the integers
mod 5 is a field you have to show that
every element of the set has an additive
inverse and that every element of the
set but 0 has a multiplicative inverse.
Draw two tables below with the values
of the integers mod 5 in each of the
left column. In the second column of
the first table, write in the additive
inverses of each element. In the second
table, write the multiplicative inverses.
-/
--additive inverses
| 0 | 0 |
| 1 | 4 |
| 2 | 3 |
| 3 | 2 |
| 4 | 1 |
--multiplicative inverses
| 0 | _ |
| 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 3 |
| 3 | 2 |
| 4 | 4 |
-- HERE
/-
4. [15 points]
Is the integers mod 4 a field? If so,
prove it informally by writing tables
giving the inverses. If not, show that
not every value in the integers mod 4
(except 0) has a multiplicative inverse,
identify a value that doesn't have an
inverse, and briefly explain why.
-/
-- HERE
Integers mod 4 is not a field, since 2 does not have a multiplicative inverse.
--multiplicative inverses
| 0 | _ |
| 1 | 1 |
| 2 | _ |
| 3 | 3 |
/-
5. [20 points]
Write a function, sum_vectrs, that
takes a list of our vectr objects as
an argument and that reduces it to a
single vector sum. To implement your
function use a version of foldr as we
developed it: one that takes an additive
monoid implicit instance as an argument,
ensuring consistency of the operator we
are using to reduce the list (add) and
the corresponding identity element.
Copy and if needed modify the foldr
definition here. It should use Lean's
monoid class, as we've done throughout
this exercise. You do not need to and
should not try to use our algebra.lean
file. Test your function by creating a
list of vectrs, [v1, v2, v3, v4], from
above, compute the expected sum, and
show that your function returns the
expected/correct result.
-/
universe u
def add_monoid_foldr
{α : Type u}
[add_monoid α]
:
list α → α
| [] := has_zero.zero
| (h::t) := has_add.add h (add_monoid_foldr t)
-- HERE
--(18,4) = (4,6) + (-6,2) + (3, -7) + (17,3)
#eval add_monoid_foldr [v1,v2,v3,v4]
/-
6. Required for graduate students,
optional extra credit for undergrads.
The set of integers mod p can be viewed
as a field with the usual addition and
multiplication operations mod p. These
finite fields (with only a finite number
of elements) play a crucial role in many
areas of number theory (in mathematics),
and in cryptography in computer science.
A. [20 points]
Instantiate the field typeclass for
fs (a prime). You
may and should stub out the proofs
all along the way using "sorry", but
before you do that, convince yourself
that you are *justified* in doing so.
Use a "fake" representation of the
integers mod 5 for this exercise: as
an enumerated type with five values.
Call them zero, one, two, three, and
four. Then define two functions,
z5add and z5mul, to add and multiply
values of this type. You can figure
out the addition and multiplication
tables and just write the functions
by cases to return the right result
in each case. Start with Lean's field
typeclass, see what you need to
instantiate it, and work backwards,
recursively applying the same method
until your reach clases that you can
implement directly. Put your code for
this problem below this comment.
Replace the following "assumptions"
with your actual definitions (commenting
out the axioms as you replace them). You
can right away right click on "field" and
"go to definition" to see what you need
to do. Solving this problem will require
some digging through Lean library code.
-/
inductive Z5 : Type
| zero
| one
| two
| three
| four
-- axioms
-- (Z5 : Type)
-- (zero one two three four: Z5)
open Z5
-- HERE
def z5add: Z5 → Z5 → Z5
| zero zero := zero
| zero one := one
| zero two := two
| zero three := three
| zero four := four
| one zero := one
| one one := two
| one two := three
| one three := four
| one four := zero
| two zero := two
| two one := three
| two two := four
| two three := zero
| two four := one
| three zero := three
| three one := four
| three two := zero
| three three := one
| three four := two
| four zero := four
| four one := zero
| four two := one
| four three := two
| four four := three
def z5mul: Z5 → Z5 → Z5
| zero _ := zero
| one zero := zero
| one one := one
| one two := two
| one three := three
| one four := four
| two zero := zero
| two one := two
| two two := four
| two three := one
| two four := three
| three zero := zero
| three one := three
| three two := one
| three three := four
| three four := two
| four zero := zero
| four one := four
| four two := three
| four three := two
| four four := one
--add_comm_group
instance : has_zero Z5 := ⟨ zero ⟩
instance : has_add Z5 := ⟨ z5add ⟩
lemma add_assoc_Z5: ∀ (a b c : Z5), z5add a (z5add b c) = z5add (z5add a b) c := sorry
instance : add_semigroup Z5 := ⟨ add_assoc_Z5 ⟩
lemma add_ident_left : ∀ (a : Z5), z5add zero a = a := sorry
lemma add_ident_right: ∀ (a: Z5), z5add a zero = a := sorry
instance : add_monoid Z5 := ⟨ add_ident_left , add_ident_right⟩
lemma add_left_ident : ∀ (a : Z5), ∃ (i : Z5), z5add i a = zero := sorry
lemma add_right_ident : ∀ (a : Z5), ∃ (i : Z5), z5add a i = zero := sorry
instance : add_group Z5 := ⟨add_left_ident, add_right_ident⟩
lemma add_comm_Z5 : ∀ (a b : Z5), z5add a b = z5add b a := sorry
instance : add_comm_group Z5 := ⟨ add_comm_Z5 ⟩
--mul_comm_group
instance : has_one Z5 := ⟨ one ⟩
instance : has_mul Z5 := ⟨ z5mul ⟩
lemma mul_assoc_Z5: ∀ (a b c : Z5), z5mul a (z5mul b c) = z5mul (z5mul a b) c := sorry
instance : semigroup Z5 := ⟨ mul_assoc_Z5 ⟩
lemma mul_ident_left : ∀ (a : Z5), z5mul one a = a := sorry
lemma mul_ident_right: ∀ (a: Z5), z5mul a one = a := sorry
instance : monoid Z5 := ⟨ mul_ident_left , mul_ident_right⟩
lemma mul_left_ident : ∀ (a : Z5), ∃ (i : Z5), z5mul i a = one := sorry
lemma mul_right_ident : ∀ (a : Z5), ∃ (i : Z5), z5mul a i = one := sorry
instance : group Z5 := ⟨mul_left_ident, mul_right_ident⟩
lemma mul_comm_Z5 : ∀ (a b : Z5), z5mul a b =z5mul b a := sorry
instance : comm_group Z5 := ⟨ mul_comm_Z5 ⟩
--distrib
lemma left_distrib_Z5 : ∀ a b c : Z5, z5mul a (z5add b c) = z5add (z5mul a b) (z5mul a c) := sorry
lemma right_distrib_Z5 : ∀ a b c : Z5, z5mul (z5add a b) c = z5add (z5mul a c) (z5mul b c) := sorry
instance : distrib Z5 := ⟨left_distrib_Z5, right_distrib_Z5⟩
--ring
instance : ring Z5 := ⟨ _ ⟩
--comm_semigroup
lemma mul_comm_semi_Z5 : ∀ a b : Z5, z5mul a b = z5mul b a := sorry
instance : comm_semigroup Z5 := ⟨ mul_comm_semi_Z5 ⟩
--comm_ring
instance : comm_ring Z5:= ⟨ _ ⟩
--nontrivial
lemma exists_pair_ne_Z5 : ∃ (x y :Z5), x ≠ y :=sorry
instance : nontrivial Z5 :=⟨ exists_pair_ne_Z5 ⟩
--field
lemma mul_inv_cancel_Z5 : ∀ {a : Z5}, a ≠ zero → a * a⁻¹ = one := sorry
lemma inv_zero_Z5 : (zero : Z5)⁻¹ = zero := sorry
instance field_Z5: field Z5 := ⟨ mul_inv_cancel_Z5, inv_zero_Z5 ⟩
/-
class comm_ring (α : Type u) extends ring α, comm_semigroup α
class field (K : Type u) extends comm_ring K, div_inv_monoid K, nontrivial K :=
(mul_inv_cancel : ∀ {a : K}, a ≠ 0 → a * a⁻¹ = 1)
(inv_zero : (0 : K)⁻¹ = 0)
-/
/-
B. [15 points]
Given that you've now presumably
established that Z5 is a field,
let z5scalr be an abbreviation for
Z5, and z5vectr for Z5 ⨯ Z5. Then
use #eval to evaluate an expression
(that you make up) involving vector
addition and scalar multiplication
using our new z5vectr objects, i.e.,
vectors over Z5. These vectors will
look like, e.g., (one, three). Work
out the right answer by hand and
test your code to gain confidence
that it's working correctly.
-/
inductive foo : Type
| bar
open foo
def add_foo : foo → foo → foo
| foo.bar foo.bar := foo.bar
instance has_add_foo : has_add foo := ⟨ add_foo ⟩
#reduce (bar, bar) + (bar, bar)
-- HERE
abbreviation z5scalr [field Z5] := Z5
abbreviation z5vectr [field Z5] := (Z5, Z5)
#check z5vectr
def z1: z5vectr := (one, three)
def z2: z5vectr := (two, three)
def z3: z5vectr := two • z1 + z2
#reduce z3
/-
Take away: Instantiating a typeclass
for a given type can provide a whole
set of operations and notations that
you can use to "do algebra" with that
type. The underlying types themselves
can be very diverse. That is, we can
impose the same abstract interface on
sets of objects of different kinds,
just as we previously imposed a group
API on the elements of the symmetry
group, D4, of a square. Here we've now
seen that we can write vector space
algebra computations involving 2-D
vectors over both the rational and
the integers mod 5. It's in this
sense that instantiating a typeclass
for a type provides a new "API" for
manipulating values of that type.
And while languages such as Haskell
do provide typeclasses, they don't
provide a language in which you can
declaratively express and give proofs
of the "rules" that structures have
to follow to be valid instances. So,
welcome to Lean, a language in which
you can write mathematics and code,
with strong automated type checking
of both code and proofs. If it has to
be right (which is the case for much
crypto code), maybe write it like so!
-/
inductive three : Type
| O
| I
| II
def mult : three → three → three :=
begin
assume t1 t2,
cases t1,
cases t2,
exact three.O,
exact three.O,
exact three.O,
cases t2,
exact three.O,
exact three.I,
exact three.II,
cases t2,
exact three.O,
exact three.O,
exact three.I,
end
open three
#reduce mult II II
lemma one_mult : ∀ (t : three), mult I t = t :=
λ (t : three),
match t with
| O := eq.refl O
| I := rfl
| II := rfl
end |
851cf9746f86b3176d414b29a3011ae4af3f71d9 | 6dc0c8ce7a76229dd81e73ed4474f15f88a9e294 | /stage0/src/Lean/Parser/Tactic.lean | ac76e4b29790750bd63dca6c5edd9b0d96270540 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | williamdemeo/lean4 | 72161c58fe65c3ad955d6a3050bb7d37c04c0d54 | 6d00fcf1d6d873e195f9220c668ef9c58e9c4a35 | refs/heads/master | 1,678,305,356,877 | 1,614,708,995,000 | 1,614,708,995,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,015 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Sebastian Ullrich
-/
import Lean.Parser.Term
namespace Lean
namespace Parser
namespace Tactic
builtin_initialize
registerParserAlias! "tacticSeq" tacticSeq
@[builtinTacticParser] def «unknown» := parser! withPosition (ident >> errorAtSavedPos "unknown tactic" true)
@[builtinTacticParser] def nestedTactic := tacticSeqBracketed
/- Auxiliary parser for expanding `match` tactic -/
@[builtinTacticParser] def eraseAuxDiscrs := parser!:maxPrec "eraseAuxDiscrs!"
def matchRhs := Term.hole <|> Term.syntheticHole <|> tacticSeq
def matchAlts := Term.matchAlts (rhsParser := matchRhs)
@[builtinTacticParser] def «match» := parser!:leadPrec "match " >> sepBy1 Term.matchDiscr ", " >> Term.optType >> " with " >> matchAlts
@[builtinTacticParser] def introMatch := parser! nonReservedSymbol "intro " >> matchAlts
end Tactic
end Parser
end Lean
|
ae225b87be3bc1b8ee99739ce6416e55d94ee9db | d0f9af2b0ace5ce352570d61b09019c8ef4a3b96 | /hw4/hw4.lean | c7e610184e7f5fe90068b9c70685c17ea687bc1c | [] | no_license | jngo13/Discrete-Mathematics | 8671540ef2da7c75915d32332dd20c02f001474e | bf674a866e61f60e6e6d128df85fa73819091787 | refs/heads/master | 1,675,615,657,924 | 1,609,142,011,000 | 1,609,142,011,000 | 267,190,341 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,257 | lean | -- Justin Ngo
-- jmn4fms
-- 2/17/20
-- Sullivan 2102-001
/-
Here we import the dm_option type defined in class
from the instructor directory. This line shows how
to include a file from the parent of the parent of
the current directory (one dot = current, two dots
= parent, three = parent of parent), descending into
several subdirectories before finding the file that
we want to import. Leave off the ".lean" extension.
-/
import ...instructor.types.option.dm_option
open hidden
/- #1
Representing Partial Functions as Total Functions
[20 points]
Consider the strictly partial function, pid, from
natural numbers to natural numbers, defined by cases
as follows. If n is zero, the function is undefined,
otherwise pid n = n. We can't represent this function
directly in Lean, because Lean requires all functions
to be total. The usual approach is to represent such
a partial function as a total function that returns
not a nat (for then it would have to return a nat,
even when the argument is zero) but a value of type
option nat. Use this approach to implement pid in
Lean. Use "by cases" syntax. (Fill in the blanks.)
-/
def pid : nat → dm_option nat
| 0 := dm_option.none
| n := dm_option.some n
/- #2
Defining functions by cases (by pattern matching)
[15 points]
Given a value of type option ℕ, the value might be
none or it might be some n, where n is a value of
type ℕ. Write a funtion option_to_nat that takes
any value of type option ℕ as an argument and that
returns a natural number: namely 0 if the option
value is none, and n if the option value is some n.
Write your definition using C-style syntax, with
an explicit return type specified. You will want
to use a "match ... with ... end" expression to do
the required pattern matching.
(Note that it will be impossible to tell from the
return value alone whether a given option was none
or some 0.)
-/
-- ANSWER HERE
def option_to_nat (option :dm_option ℕ ):=
match option with
|(dm_option.none) := nat.zero
|(dm_option.some n) := n
end
/- #3
Inductive definitions.
[15 points]
You have probably yelled into a canyon (or maybe
between two buildings) and heard a reverberating
echo. An echo is a sound followed by another echo,
or, eventually an echo is no sound at all (at which
point the reverberation ends).
Define a data type, echo, values of which represent
echoes. For our purposes, an echo comes in one of
two forms: it is either "silence" (at which point
there is no more reverberation) OR it is a "sound"
followed another echo.
You can think of "silence" as a "base case" and
"sound" as an inductive case, in the sense that
an echo of this form is a sound followed by a
smaller echo. Give each of these cases its own
constructor.
Once you've defined your data type, define e0,
e1, and e3 to be identifiers bound to three values
of this type, where e0 is bound to "silence", e1
is bound to an echo with one sound followed by
silence, and e3 is bound to an echo with three
sounds followed by silence.
-/
-- ANSWERS HERE
inductive echo : Type
| silence : echo
| sound (n' : echo) : echo
def e0 := echo.silence
def e1 := echo.sound e0
def e3 := echo.sound (echo.sound e1)
/- #4
Lists. A word list type.
[10 points]
Define a data type, list_words_ values of which
represent lists of words, where words are represented
as values of type string. For our purposes, such a
list comes in one of two forms: it is either "nil"
(the word we tend to use for empty lists), or it is
*constructed* from a word followed by a smaller list
of words. Give each form of list its own constructor.
Call the constructors nil and cons.
Once you've defined your data type, define l0,
l1, and l3 to be identifiers bound to three values
of this type, where l0 is bound to an empty list
of words, l1 is bound to a list with one word
(followed by the empty list), and l3 is bound to
a list with three words. We don't care what words
you put in your lists (but be nice :-).
-/
-- ANSWERS HERE
inductive list_words_ : Type
| nil : list_words_
| cons (n : list_words_)(s : string) : list_words_
def l0 := list_words_.nil
def l1 := list_words_.cons l0 "hi"
def l3 := list_words_.cons (list_words_.cons l1 "hi")
/- #5
Recursive definitions. Length of word list.
[10 points]
Define a function, num_words, that takes a word
list (as just defined) as an argument and that
returns the length of the list as a value of type
ℕ.
-/
def num_words: list_words_→ ℕ
|(list_words_.nil) := 0
|(list_words_.cons l s):= 1 + (num_words l)
/- #6
Recursion. Number of permutations of a set.
[10 points]
Suppose you have a set containing n objects,
where n is a natural number. How many ways are
there to make an ordered list of n objects from
this (unordered) set? Such an ordered list is
called a permutation.
As an example, consider the set, { x, y, z}.
Here are the lists:
- x, y, z
- x, z, y
- y, x, z
- y, z, x
- z, x, y
- z, y, x
It's not too hard to see the answer to the
question. First, if the set is empty, there
is only *one* way to make a list: it is the
empty list. If the list is not empty, there
are n ways to pick the first element of the
list (so in our example, there are three ways
to pick the first element: it has to be x or
y or z); and then what's left is to make the
rest of each list from remaining n-1 (in our
example, 2) elements. So the number of lists
has to be n *times* the number of lists that
can be produced from a set of size n-1.
We can express this idea as a function. Let's
call it the permutations function, or perms,
for short. As we've seen, perms 0 must be one.
This is the base case. Implement the function,
perms: ℕ → ℕ, to compute the number of perms
for a set of any given size, n. Note that in
Lean you'll need to use "by cases" syntax to
define a recursive function.
-/
def perms: ℕ → ℕ
| 0 := 1
| (nat.succ n) := (n+1)*(perms n)
/- #7
Recursion. Number of subsets of a given set.
[20 points]
How many subsets are there of a set of size
n?
A subset of a set, s, is a set all of whose
elements are in s. So every set is a subset
of itself, and the empty set is a subset of
every set, s (since all of its elements, of
which there are none(!), are in s).
So how many subsets are there of a set of
size n? We can answer this question nicely
using recursion. First, how many subsets are
there of the empty set? It's one, right? If
you don't see this immediately, reread the
preceding explanation.
Now, consider a set, s, of size n, where n
is one more than some number, n'. How many
subsets does s have?
To see the answer, ask the question, how
many subsets does a subset of s of size n'
= (n-1) have? If you have the answer to
that question, then you can easily compute
the number of subsets of s. A set, s', of
size n' must have left out one element of
s, let's call it e. For each subset of s',
you can form *two* subsets of s: one with,
and one without e.
Write a function, power_set_cardinality,
that takes a natural number representing
the size of a set, s, and that then returns
a natural number expressing the number of
subsets there are of a set of that size.
-/
def power_set_cardinality: ℕ → ℕ
|(nat.zero) := 1
|(nat.succ n'):= 2* (power_set_cardinality n')
|
36119b50a484d09062da7c1dacbdb3aee9f1575c | 367134ba5a65885e863bdc4507601606690974c1 | /src/computability/tm_computable.lean | 4154e47fe9d9d02b816cf9fa9f9bd6cfb9a44d28 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kodyvajjha/mathlib | 9bead00e90f68269a313f45f5561766cfd8d5cad | b98af5dd79e13a38d84438b850a2e8858ec21284 | refs/heads/master | 1,624,350,366,310 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 162,666,963 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,545,367,651,000 | 1,545,367,651,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 11,344 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Pim Spelier, Daan van Gent. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Pim Spelier, Daan van Gent.
-/
import computability.encoding
import computability.turing_machine
import data.polynomial.basic
import data.polynomial.eval
/-!
# Computable functions
This file contains the definition of a Turing machine with some finiteness conditions
(bundling the definition of TM2 in turing_machine.lean), a definition of when a TM gives a certain
output (in a certain time), and the definition of computability (in polytime or any time function)
of a function between two types that have an encoding (as in encoding.lean).
## Main theorems
- `id_computable_in_poly_time` : a TM + a proof it computes the identity on a type in polytime.
- `id_computable` : a TM + a proof it computes the identity on a type.
## Implementation notes
To count the execution time of a Turing machine, we have decided to count the number of times the
`step` function is used. Each step executes a statement (of type stmt); this is a function, and
generally contains multiple "fundamental" steps (pushing, popping, so on). However, as functions
only contain a finite number of executions and each one is executed at most once, this execution
time is up to multiplication by a constant the amount of fundamental steps.
-/
open computability
namespace turing
/-- A bundled TM2 (an equivalent of the classical Turing machine, defined starting from
the namespace `turing.TM2` in `turing_machine.lean`), with an input and output stack,
a main function, an initial state and some finiteness guarantees. -/
structure fin_tm2 :=
{K : Type} [K_decidable_eq : decidable_eq K] [K_fin : fintype K] -- index type of stacks
(k₀ k₁ : K) -- input and output stack
(Γ : K → Type) -- type of stack elements
(Λ : Type) (main : Λ) [Λ_fin : fintype Λ] -- type of function labels
(σ : Type) (initial_state : σ) -- type of states of the machine
[σ_fin : fintype σ]
[Γk₀_fin : fintype (Γ k₀)]
(M : Λ → turing.TM2.stmt Γ Λ σ) -- the program itself, i.e. one function for every function label
namespace fin_tm2
section
variable (tm : fin_tm2)
instance : decidable_eq tm.K := tm.K_decidable_eq
instance : inhabited tm.σ := ⟨tm.initial_state⟩
/-- The type of statements (functions) corresponding to this TM. -/
@[derive inhabited]
def stmt : Type := turing.TM2.stmt tm.Γ tm.Λ tm.σ
/-- The type of configurations (functions) corresponding to this TM. -/
def cfg : Type := turing.TM2.cfg tm.Γ tm.Λ tm.σ
instance inhabited_cfg : inhabited (cfg tm) :=
turing.TM2.cfg.inhabited _ _ _
/-- The step function corresponding to this TM. -/
@[simp] def step : tm.cfg → option tm.cfg :=
turing.TM2.step tm.M
end
end fin_tm2
/-- The initial configuration corresponding to a list in the input alphabet. -/
def init_list (tm : fin_tm2) (s : list (tm.Γ tm.k₀)) : tm.cfg :=
{ l := option.some tm.main,
var := tm.initial_state,
stk := λ k, @dite (list (tm.Γ k)) (k = tm.k₀) (tm.K_decidable_eq k tm.k₀)
(λ h, begin rw h, exact s, end)
(λ _,[]) }
/-- The final configuration corresponding to a list in the output alphabet. -/
def halt_list (tm : fin_tm2) (s : list (tm.Γ tm.k₁)) : tm.cfg :=
{ l := option.none,
var := tm.initial_state,
stk := λ k, @dite (list (tm.Γ k)) (k = tm.k₁) (tm.K_decidable_eq k tm.k₁)
(λ h, begin rw h, exact s, end)
(λ _,[]) }
/-- A "proof" of the fact that f eventually reaches b when repeatedly evaluated on a,
remembering the number of steps it takes. -/
structure evals_to {σ : Type*} (f : σ → option σ) (a : σ) (b : option σ) :=
(steps : ℕ)
(evals_in_steps : ((flip bind f)^[steps] a) = b)
/-- A "proof" of the fact that `f` eventually reaches `b` in at most `m` steps when repeatedly
evaluated on `a`, remembering the number of steps it takes. -/
structure evals_to_in_time {σ : Type*} (f : σ → option σ) (a : σ) (b : option σ) (m : ℕ)
extends evals_to f a b :=
(steps_le_m : steps ≤ m)
/-- Reflexivity of `evals_to` in 0 steps. -/
@[refl] def evals_to.refl {σ : Type*} (f : σ → option σ) (a : σ) : evals_to f a a := ⟨0,rfl⟩
/-- Transitivity of `evals_to` in the sum of the numbers of steps. -/
@[trans] def evals_to.trans {σ : Type*} (f : σ → option σ) (a : σ) (b : σ) (c : option σ)
(h₁ : evals_to f a b) (h₂ : evals_to f b c) : evals_to f a c :=
⟨h₂.steps + h₁.steps,
by rw [function.iterate_add_apply,h₁.evals_in_steps,h₂.evals_in_steps]⟩
/-- Reflexivity of `evals_to_in_time` in 0 steps. -/
@[refl] def evals_to_in_time.refl {σ : Type*} (f : σ → option σ) (a : σ) :
evals_to_in_time f a a 0 :=
⟨evals_to.refl f a, le_refl 0⟩
/-- Transitivity of `evals_to_in_time` in the sum of the numbers of steps. -/
@[trans] def evals_to_in_time.trans {σ : Type*} (f : σ → option σ) (a : σ) (b : σ) (c : option σ)
(m₁ : ℕ) (m₂ : ℕ) (h₁ : evals_to_in_time f a b m₁) (h₂ : evals_to_in_time f b c m₂) :
evals_to_in_time f a c (m₂ + m₁) :=
⟨evals_to.trans f a b c h₁.to_evals_to h₂.to_evals_to, add_le_add h₂.steps_le_m h₁.steps_le_m⟩
/-- A proof of tm outputting l' when given l. -/
def tm2_outputs (tm : fin_tm2) (l : list (tm.Γ tm.k₀)) (l' : option (list (tm.Γ tm.k₁))) :=
evals_to tm.step (init_list tm l) ((option.map (halt_list tm)) l')
/-- A proof of tm outputting l' when given l in at most m steps. -/
def tm2_outputs_in_time (tm : fin_tm2) (l : list (tm.Γ tm.k₀))
(l' : option (list (tm.Γ tm.k₁))) (m : ℕ) :=
evals_to_in_time tm.step (init_list tm l) ((option.map (halt_list tm)) l') m
/-- The forgetful map, forgetting the upper bound on the number of steps. -/
def tm2_outputs_in_time.to_tm2_outputs {tm : fin_tm2} {l : list (tm.Γ tm.k₀)}
{l' : option (list (tm.Γ tm.k₁))} {m : ℕ} (h : tm2_outputs_in_time tm l l' m) :
tm2_outputs tm l l' :=
h.to_evals_to
/-- A Turing machine with input alphabet equivalent to Γ₀ and output alphabet equivalent to Γ₁. -/
structure tm2_computable_aux (Γ₀ Γ₁ : Type) :=
( tm : fin_tm2 )
( input_alphabet : tm.Γ tm.k₀ ≃ Γ₀ )
( output_alphabet : tm.Γ tm.k₁ ≃ Γ₁ )
/-- A Turing machine + a proof it outputs f. -/
structure tm2_computable {α β : Type} (ea : fin_encoding α) (eb : fin_encoding β) (f : α → β)
extends tm2_computable_aux ea.Γ eb.Γ :=
(outputs_fun : ∀ a, tm2_outputs tm (list.map input_alphabet.inv_fun (ea.encode a))
(option.some ((list.map output_alphabet.inv_fun) (eb.encode (f a)))) )
/-- A Turing machine + a time function + a proof it outputs f in at most time(len(input)) steps. -/
structure tm2_computable_in_time {α β : Type} (ea : fin_encoding α) (eb : fin_encoding β)
(f : α → β)
extends tm2_computable_aux ea.Γ eb.Γ :=
( time: ℕ → ℕ )
( outputs_fun : ∀ a, tm2_outputs_in_time tm (list.map input_alphabet.inv_fun (ea.encode a))
(option.some ((list.map output_alphabet.inv_fun) (eb.encode (f a))))
(time (ea.encode a).length) )
/-- A Turing machine + a polynomial time function + a proof it outputs f in at most time(len(input))
steps. -/
structure tm2_computable_in_poly_time {α β : Type} (ea : fin_encoding α) (eb : fin_encoding β)
(f : α → β)
extends tm2_computable_aux ea.Γ eb.Γ :=
( time: polynomial ℕ )
( outputs_fun : ∀ a, tm2_outputs_in_time tm (list.map input_alphabet.inv_fun (ea.encode a))
(option.some ((list.map output_alphabet.inv_fun) (eb.encode (f a))))
(time.eval (ea.encode a).length) )
/-- A forgetful map, forgetting the time bound on the number of steps. -/
def tm2_computable_in_time.to_tm2_computable {α β : Type} {ea : fin_encoding α}
{eb : fin_encoding β} {f : α → β} (h : tm2_computable_in_time ea eb f) :
tm2_computable ea eb f :=
⟨h.to_tm2_computable_aux, λ a, tm2_outputs_in_time.to_tm2_outputs (h.outputs_fun a)⟩
/-- A forgetful map, forgetting that the time function is polynomial. -/
def tm2_computable_in_poly_time.to_tm2_computable_in_time {α β : Type} {ea : fin_encoding α}
{eb : fin_encoding β} {f : α → β} (h : tm2_computable_in_poly_time ea eb f) :
tm2_computable_in_time ea eb f :=
⟨h.to_tm2_computable_aux, λ n, h.time.eval n, h.outputs_fun⟩
open turing.TM2.stmt
/-- A Turing machine computing the identity on α. -/
def id_computer {α : Type} (ea : fin_encoding α) : fin_tm2 :=
{ K := unit,
k₀ := ⟨⟩,
k₁ := ⟨⟩,
Γ := λ _, ea.Γ,
Λ := unit,
main := ⟨⟩,
σ := unit,
initial_state := ⟨⟩,
Γk₀_fin := ea.Γ_fin,
M := λ _, halt }
instance inhabited_fin_tm2 : inhabited fin_tm2 :=
⟨id_computer computability.inhabited_fin_encoding.default⟩
noncomputable theory
/-- A proof that the identity map on α is computable in polytime. -/
def id_computable_in_poly_time {α : Type} (ea : fin_encoding α) :
@tm2_computable_in_poly_time α α ea ea id :=
{ tm := id_computer ea,
input_alphabet := equiv.cast rfl,
output_alphabet := equiv.cast rfl,
time := 1,
outputs_fun := λ _, { steps := 1,
evals_in_steps := rfl,
steps_le_m := by simp only [polynomial.eval_one] } }
instance inhabited_tm2_computable_in_poly_time : inhabited (tm2_computable_in_poly_time
(default (fin_encoding bool)) (default (fin_encoding bool)) id) :=
⟨id_computable_in_poly_time computability.inhabited_fin_encoding.default⟩
instance inhabited_tm2_outputs_in_time :
inhabited (tm2_outputs_in_time (id_computer fin_encoding_bool_bool)
(list.map (equiv.cast rfl).inv_fun [ff]) (some (list.map (equiv.cast rfl).inv_fun [ff])) _) :=
⟨(id_computable_in_poly_time fin_encoding_bool_bool).outputs_fun ff⟩
instance inhabited_tm2_outputs : inhabited (tm2_outputs (id_computer fin_encoding_bool_bool)
(list.map (equiv.cast rfl).inv_fun [ff]) (some (list.map (equiv.cast rfl).inv_fun [ff]))) :=
⟨tm2_outputs_in_time.to_tm2_outputs turing.inhabited_tm2_outputs_in_time.default⟩
instance inhabited_evals_to_in_time :
inhabited (evals_to_in_time (λ _ : unit, some ⟨⟩) ⟨⟩ (some ⟨⟩) 0) :=
⟨evals_to_in_time.refl _ _⟩
instance inhabited_tm2_evals_to : inhabited (evals_to (λ _ : unit, some ⟨⟩) ⟨⟩ (some ⟨⟩)) :=
⟨evals_to.refl _ _⟩
/-- A proof that the identity map on α is computable in time. -/
def id_computable_in_time {α : Type} (ea : fin_encoding α) : @tm2_computable_in_time α α ea ea id :=
tm2_computable_in_poly_time.to_tm2_computable_in_time $ id_computable_in_poly_time ea
instance inhabited_tm2_computable_in_time :
inhabited (tm2_computable_in_time fin_encoding_bool_bool fin_encoding_bool_bool id) :=
⟨id_computable_in_time computability.inhabited_fin_encoding.default⟩
/-- A proof that the identity map on α is computable. -/
def id_computable {α : Type} (ea : fin_encoding α) : @tm2_computable α α ea ea id :=
tm2_computable_in_time.to_tm2_computable $ id_computable_in_time ea
instance inhabited_tm2_computable :
inhabited (tm2_computable fin_encoding_bool_bool fin_encoding_bool_bool id) :=
⟨id_computable computability.inhabited_fin_encoding.default⟩
instance inhabited_tm2_computable_aux : inhabited (tm2_computable_aux bool bool) :=
⟨(default (tm2_computable fin_encoding_bool_bool fin_encoding_bool_bool id)).to_tm2_computable_aux⟩
end turing
|
fcdec36eb83d9bcdd1d417a8d04eafc511fdbc0b | b328e8ebb2ba923140e5137c83f09fa59516b793 | /stage0/src/Lean/Elab/Quotation.lean | 34713002a9bb1bf7c4fde7cf23732020277213ee | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | DrMaxis/lean4 | a781bcc095511687c56ab060e816fd948553e162 | 5a02c4facc0658aad627cfdcc3db203eac0cb544 | refs/heads/master | 1,677,051,517,055 | 1,611,876,226,000 | 1,611,876,226,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 23,111 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sebastian Ullrich
Elaboration of syntax quotations as terms and patterns (in `match_syntax`). See also `./Hygiene.lean` for the basic
hygiene workings and data types.
-/
import Lean.Syntax
import Lean.ResolveName
import Lean.Elab.Term
import Lean.Elab.Quotation.Util
import Lean.Parser.Term
namespace Lean.Elab.Term.Quotation
open Lean.Parser.Term
open Lean.Syntax
open Meta
/-- `C[$(e)]` ~> `let a := e; C[$a]`. Used in the implementation of antiquot splices. -/
private partial def floatOutAntiquotTerms : Syntax → StateT (Syntax → TermElabM Syntax) TermElabM Syntax
| stx@(Syntax.node k args) => do
if isAntiquot stx && !isEscapedAntiquot stx then
let e := getAntiquotTerm stx
if !e.isIdent || !e.getId.isAtomic then
return ← withFreshMacroScope do
let a ← `(a)
modify (fun cont stx => (`(let $a:ident := $e; $stx) : TermElabM _))
stx.setArg 2 a
Syntax.node k (← args.mapM floatOutAntiquotTerms)
| stx => pure stx
private def getSepFromSplice (splice : Syntax) : Syntax := do
let Syntax.atom _ sep ← getAntiquotSpliceSuffix splice | unreachable!
Syntax.mkStrLit (sep.dropRight 1)
partial def mkTuple : Array Syntax → TermElabM Syntax
| #[] => `(Unit.unit)
| #[e] => e
| es => do
let stx ← mkTuple (es.eraseIdx 0)
`(Prod.mk $(es[0]) $stx)
def resolveSectionVariable (sectionVars : NameMap Name) (id : Name) : List (Name × List String) :=
-- decode macro scopes from name before recursion
let extractionResult := extractMacroScopes id
let rec loop : Name → List String → List (Name × List String)
| id@(Name.str p s _), projs =>
-- NOTE: we assume that macro scopes always belong to the projected constant, not the projections
let id := { extractionResult with name := id }.review
match sectionVars.find? id with
| some newId => [(newId, projs)]
| none => loop p (s::projs)
| _, _ => []
loop extractionResult.name []
-- Elaborate the content of a syntax quotation term
private partial def quoteSyntax : Syntax → TermElabM Syntax
| Syntax.ident info rawVal val preresolved => do
-- Add global scopes at compilation time (now), add macro scope at runtime (in the quotation).
-- See the paper for details.
let r ← resolveGlobalName val
-- extension of the paper algorithm: also store unique section variable names as top-level scopes
-- so they can be captured and used inside the section, but not outside
let r' := resolveSectionVariable (← read).sectionVars val
let preresolved := r ++ r' ++ preresolved
let val := quote val
-- `scp` is bound in stxQuot.expand
`(Syntax.ident info $(quote rawVal) (addMacroScope mainModule $val scp) $(quote preresolved))
-- if antiquotation, insert contents as-is, else recurse
| stx@(Syntax.node k _) => do
if isAntiquot stx && !isEscapedAntiquot stx then
getAntiquotTerm stx
else if isTokenAntiquot stx && !isEscapedAntiquot stx then
match stx[0] with
| Syntax.atom _ val => `(Syntax.atom (Option.getD (getHeadInfo $(getAntiquotTerm stx)) info) $(quote val))
| _ => throwErrorAt stx "expected token"
else if isAntiquotSuffixSplice stx && !isEscapedAntiquot stx then
-- splices must occur in a `many` node
throwErrorAt stx "unexpected antiquotation splice"
else if isAntiquotSplice stx && !isEscapedAntiquot stx then
throwErrorAt stx "unexpected antiquotation splice"
else
let empty ← `(Array.empty);
-- if escaped antiquotation, decrement by one escape level
let stx := unescapeAntiquot stx
let args ← stx.getArgs.foldlM (fun args arg => do
if k == nullKind && isAntiquotSuffixSplice arg then
let antiquot := getAntiquotSuffixSpliceInner arg
match antiquotSuffixSplice? arg with
| `optional => `(Array.appendCore $args (match $(getAntiquotTerm antiquot):term with
| some x => Array.empty.push x
| none => Array.empty))
| `many => `(Array.appendCore $args $(getAntiquotTerm antiquot))
| `sepBy => `(Array.appendCore $args (@SepArray.elemsAndSeps $(getSepFromSplice arg) $(getAntiquotTerm antiquot)))
| k => throwErrorAt! arg "invalid antiquotation suffix splice kind '{k}'"
else if k == nullKind && isAntiquotSplice arg then
let k := antiquotSpliceKind? arg
let (arg, bindLets) ← floatOutAntiquotTerms arg |>.run pure
let inner ← (getAntiquotSpliceContents arg).mapM quoteSyntax
let ids ← getAntiquotationIds arg
if ids.isEmpty then
throwErrorAt stx "antiquotation splice must contain at least one antiquotation"
let arr ← match k with
| `optional => `(match $[$ids:ident],* with
| $[some $ids:ident],* => $(quote inner)
| none => Array.empty)
| _ =>
let arr ← ids[:ids.size-1].foldrM (fun id arr => `(Array.zip $id $arr)) ids.back
`(Array.map (fun $(← mkTuple ids) => $(inner[0])) $arr)
let arr ←
if k == `sepBy then
`(mkSepArray $arr (mkAtom $(getSepFromSplice arg)))
else arr
let arr ← bindLets arr
`(Array.appendCore $args $arr)
else do
let arg ← quoteSyntax arg;
`(Array.push $args $arg)) empty
`(Syntax.node $(quote k) $args)
| Syntax.atom _ val =>
`(Syntax.atom info $(quote val))
| Syntax.missing => unreachable!
def stxQuot.expand (stx : Syntax) : TermElabM Syntax := do
/- Syntax quotations are monadic values depending on the current macro scope. For efficiency, we bind
the macro scope once for each quotation, then build the syntax tree in a completely pure computation
depending on this binding. Note that regular function calls do not introduce a new macro scope (i.e.
we preserve referential transparency), so we can refer to this same `scp` inside `quoteSyntax` by
including it literally in a syntax quotation. -/
-- TODO: simplify to `(do scp ← getCurrMacroScope; pure $(quoteSyntax quoted))
let stx ← quoteSyntax stx.getQuotContent;
`(Bind.bind MonadRef.mkInfoFromRefPos (fun info =>
Bind.bind getCurrMacroScope (fun scp =>
Bind.bind getMainModule (fun mainModule => Pure.pure $stx))))
/- NOTE: It may seem like the newly introduced binding `scp` may accidentally
capture identifiers in an antiquotation introduced by `quoteSyntax`. However,
note that the syntax quotation above enjoys the same hygiene guarantees as
anywhere else in Lean; that is, we implement hygienic quotations by making
use of the hygienic quotation support of the bootstrapped Lean compiler!
Aside: While this might sound "dangerous", it is in fact less reliant on a
"chain of trust" than other bootstrapping parts of Lean: because this
implementation itself never uses `scp` (or any other identifier) both inside
and outside quotations, it can actually correctly be compiled by an
unhygienic (but otherwise correct) implementation of syntax quotations. As
long as it is then compiled again with the resulting executable (i.e. up to
stage 2), the result is a correct hygienic implementation. In this sense the
implementation is "self-stabilizing". It was in fact originally compiled
by an unhygienic prototype implementation. -/
macro "elabStxQuot!" kind:ident : command =>
`(@[builtinTermElab $kind:ident] def elabQuot : TermElab := adaptExpander stxQuot.expand)
--
elabStxQuot! Parser.Level.quot
elabStxQuot! Parser.Term.quot
elabStxQuot! Parser.Term.funBinder.quot
elabStxQuot! Parser.Term.bracketedBinder.quot
elabStxQuot! Parser.Term.matchDiscr.quot
elabStxQuot! Parser.Tactic.quot
elabStxQuot! Parser.Tactic.quotSeq
elabStxQuot! Parser.Term.stx.quot
elabStxQuot! Parser.Term.prec.quot
elabStxQuot! Parser.Term.attr.quot
elabStxQuot! Parser.Term.prio.quot
elabStxQuot! Parser.Term.doElem.quot
elabStxQuot! Parser.Term.dynamicQuot
/- match -/
-- an "alternative" of patterns plus right-hand side
private abbrev Alt := List Syntax × Syntax
/--
In a single match step, we match the first discriminant against the "head" of the first pattern of the first
alternative. This datatype describes what kind of check this involves, which helps other patterns decide if
they are covered by the same check and don't have to be checked again (see also `MatchResult`). -/
inductive HeadCheck where
-- match step that always succeeds: _, x, `($x), ...
| unconditional
-- match step based on kind and, optionally, arity of discriminant
-- If `arity` is given, that number of new discriminants is introduced. `covered` patterns should then introduce the
-- same number of new patterns.
-- We actually check the arity at run time only in the case of `null` nodes since it should otherwise by implied by
-- the node kind.
-- without arity: `($x:k)
-- with arity: any quotation without an antiquotation head pattern
| shape (k : SyntaxNodeKind) (arity : Option Nat)
-- Match step that succeeds on `null` nodes of arity at least `numPrefix + numSuffix`, introducing discriminants
-- for the first `numPrefix` children, one `null` node for those in between, and for the `numSuffix` last children.
-- example: `([$x, $xs,*, $y]) is `slice 2 2`
| slice (numPrefix numSuffix : Nat)
-- other, complicated match step that will probably only cover identical patterns
-- example: antiquotation splices `($[...]*)
| other (pat : Syntax)
open HeadCheck
/-- Describe whether a pattern is covered by a head check (induced by the pattern itself or a different pattern). -/
inductive MatchResult where
-- Pattern agrees with head check, remove and transform remaining alternative.
-- If `exhaustive` is `false`, *also* include unchanged alternative in the "no" branch.
| covered (f : Alt → TermElabM Alt) (exhaustive : Bool)
-- Pattern disagrees with head check, include in "no" branch only
| uncovered
-- Pattern is not quite sure yet; include unchanged in both branches
| undecided
open MatchResult
/-- All necessary information on a pattern head. -/
structure HeadInfo where
-- check induced by the pattern
check : HeadCheck
-- compute compatibility of pattern with given head check
onMatch (taken : HeadCheck) : MatchResult
-- actually run the specified head check, with the discriminant bound to `discr`
doMatch (yes : (newDiscrs : List Syntax) → TermElabM Syntax) (no : TermElabM Syntax) : TermElabM Syntax
/-- Adapt alternatives that do not introduce new discriminants in `doMatch`, but are covered by those that do so. -/
private def noOpMatchAdaptPats : HeadCheck → Alt → Alt
| shape k (some sz), (pats, rhs) => (List.replicate sz (Unhygienic.run `(_)) ++ pats, rhs)
| slice p s, (pats, rhs) => (List.replicate (p + 1 + s) (Unhygienic.run `(_)) ++ pats, rhs)
| _, alt => alt
private def adaptRhs (fn : Syntax → TermElabM Syntax) : Alt → TermElabM Alt
| (pats, rhs) => do (pats, ← fn rhs)
private partial def getHeadInfo (alt : Alt) : TermElabM HeadInfo :=
let pat := alt.fst.head!
let unconditionally (rhsFn) := pure {
check := unconditional,
doMatch := fun yes no => yes [],
onMatch := fun taken => covered (adaptRhs rhsFn ∘ noOpMatchAdaptPats taken) (match taken with | unconditional => true | _ => false)
}
-- quotation pattern
if isQuot pat then
let quoted := getQuotContent pat
if quoted.isAtom then
-- We assume that atoms are uniquely determined by the node kind and never have to be checked
unconditionally pure
else if quoted.isTokenAntiquot then
unconditionally (`(let $(quoted.getAntiquotTerm) := discr; $(·)))
else if isAntiquot quoted && !isEscapedAntiquot quoted then
-- quotation contains a single antiquotation
let k := antiquotKind? quoted |>.get!
-- Antiquotation kinds like `$id:ident` influence the parser, but also need to be considered by
-- `match` (but not by quotation terms). For example, `($id:ident) and `($e) are not
-- distinguishable without checking the kind of the node to be captured. Note that some
-- antiquotations like the latter one for terms do not correspond to any actual node kind
-- (signified by `k == Name.anonymous`), so we would only check for `ident` here.
--
-- if stx.isOfKind `ident then
-- let id := stx; let e := stx; ...
-- else
-- let e := stx; ...
let anti := getAntiquotTerm quoted
if anti.isIdent then
let rhsFn := (`(let $anti := discr; $(·)))
if k == Name.anonymous then unconditionally rhsFn else pure {
check := shape k none,
onMatch := fun
| taken@(shape k' sz) =>
if k' == k then
covered (adaptRhs rhsFn ∘ noOpMatchAdaptPats taken) (exhaustive := sz.isNone)
else uncovered
| _ => uncovered,
doMatch := fun yes no => do `(cond (Syntax.isOfKind discr $(quote k)) $(← yes []) $(← no)),
}
else throwErrorAt! anti "match_syntax: antiquotation must be variable {anti}"
else if isAntiquotSuffixSplice quoted then throwErrorAt quoted "unexpected antiquotation splice"
else if isAntiquotSplice quoted then throwErrorAt quoted "unexpected antiquotation splice"
else if quoted.getArgs.size == 1 && isAntiquotSuffixSplice quoted[0] then
let anti := getAntiquotTerm (getAntiquotSuffixSpliceInner quoted[0])
unconditionally fun rhs => match antiquotSuffixSplice? quoted[0] with
| `optional => `(let $anti := Syntax.getOptional? discr; $rhs)
| `many => `(let $anti := Syntax.getArgs discr; $rhs)
| `sepBy => `(let $anti := @SepArray.mk $(getSepFromSplice quoted[0]) (Syntax.getArgs discr); $rhs)
| k => throwErrorAt! quoted "invalid antiquotation suffix splice kind '{k}'"
else if quoted.getArgs.size == 1 && isAntiquotSplice quoted[0] then pure {
check := other pat,
onMatch := fun
| other pat' => if pat' == pat then covered pure (exhaustive := true) else undecided
| _ => undecided,
doMatch := fun yes no => do
let splice := quoted[0]
let k := antiquotSpliceKind? splice
let contents := getAntiquotSpliceContents splice
let ids ← getAntiquotationIds splice
let yes ← yes []
let no ← no
match k with
| `optional =>
let nones := mkArray ids.size (← `(none))
`(let* yes _ $ids* := $yes;
if discr.isNone then yes () $[ $nones]*
else match discr with
| `($(mkNullNode contents)) => yes () $[ (some $ids)]*
| _ => $no)
| _ =>
let mut discrs ← `(Syntax.getArgs discr)
if k == `sepBy then
discrs ← `(Array.getSepElems $discrs)
let tuple ← mkTuple ids
let mut yes := yes
let resId ← match ids with
| #[id] => id
| _ =>
for id in ids do
yes ← `(let $id := tuples.map (fun $tuple => $id); $yes)
`(tuples)
`(match ($(discrs).sequenceMap fun
| `($(contents[0])) => some $tuple
| _ => none) with
| some $resId => $yes
| none => $no)
}
else if let some idx := quoted.getArgs.findIdx? (fun arg => isAntiquotSuffixSplice arg || isAntiquotSplice arg) then do
/-
pattern of the form `match discr, ... with | `(pat_0 ... pat_(idx-1) $[...]* pat_(idx+1) ...), ...`
transform to
```
if discr.getNumArgs >= $quoted.getNumArgs - 1 then
match discr[0], ..., discr[idx-1], mkNullNode (discr.getArgs.extract idx (discr.getNumArgs - $numSuffix))), ..., discr[quoted.getNumArgs - 1] with
| `(pat_0), ... `(pat_(idx-1)), `($[...])*, `(pat_(idx+1)), ...
```
-/
let numSuffix := quoted.getNumArgs - 1 - idx
pure {
check := slice idx numSuffix
onMatch := fun
| slice p s =>
if p == idx && s == numSuffix then
let argPats := quoted.getArgs.mapIdx fun i arg =>
let arg := if (i : Nat) == idx then mkNullNode #[arg] else arg
Unhygienic.run `(`($(arg)))
covered (fun (pats, rhs) => (argPats.toList ++ pats, rhs)) (exhaustive := true)
else uncovered
| _ => uncovered
doMatch := fun yes no => do
let prefixDiscrs ← (List.range idx).mapM (`(Syntax.getArg discr $(quote ·)))
let sliceDiscr ← `(mkNullNode (discr.getArgs.extract $(quote idx) (discr.getNumArgs - $(quote numSuffix))))
let suffixDiscrs ← (List.range numSuffix).mapM fun i =>
`(Syntax.getArg discr (discr.getNumArgs - $(quote (numSuffix - i))))
`(ite (GreaterEq discr.getNumArgs $(quote (quoted.getNumArgs - 1)))
$(← yes (prefixDiscrs ++ sliceDiscr :: suffixDiscrs))
$(← no))
}
else
-- not an antiquotation, or an escaped antiquotation: match head shape
let quoted := unescapeAntiquot quoted
let kind := quoted.getKind
let argPats := quoted.getArgs.map fun arg => Unhygienic.run `(`($(arg)))
pure {
check := shape kind argPats.size,
onMatch := fun taken =>
if (match taken with | shape k' sz => k' == kind && sz == argPats.size | _ => false : Bool) then
covered (fun (pats, rhs) => (argPats.toList ++ pats, rhs)) (exhaustive := true)
else
uncovered,
doMatch := fun yes no => do
let cond ← match kind with
| `null => `(and (Syntax.isOfKind discr $(quote kind)) (BEq.beq (Array.size (Syntax.getArgs discr)) $(quote argPats.size)))
| _ => `(Syntax.isOfKind discr $(quote kind))
let newDiscrs ← (List.range argPats.size).mapM fun i => `(Syntax.getArg discr $(quote i))
`(ite (Eq $cond true) $(← yes newDiscrs) $(← no))
}
else match pat with
| `(_) => unconditionally pure
| `($id:ident) => unconditionally (`(let $id := discr; $(·)))
| `($id:ident@$pat) => do
let info ← getHeadInfo (pat::alt.1.tail!, alt.2)
{ info with onMatch := fun taken => match info.onMatch taken with
| covered f exh => covered (fun alt => f alt >>= adaptRhs (`(let $id := discr; $(·)))) exh
| r => r }
| _ => throwErrorAt! pat "match_syntax: unexpected pattern kind {pat}"
-- Bind right-hand side to new `let*` decl in order to prevent code duplication
private def deduplicate (floatedLetDecls : Array Syntax) : Alt → TermElabM (Array Syntax × Alt)
-- NOTE: new macro scope so that introduced bindings do not collide
| (pats, rhs) => do
if let `($f:ident $[ $args:ident]*) := rhs then
-- looks simple enough/created by this function, skip
return (floatedLetDecls, (pats, rhs))
withFreshMacroScope do
match ← getPatternsVars pats.toArray with
| #[] =>
-- no antiquotations => introduce Unit parameter to preserve evaluation order
let rhs' ← `(rhs Unit.unit)
(floatedLetDecls.push (← `(letDecl|rhs _ := $rhs)), (pats, rhs'))
| vars =>
let rhs' ← `(rhs $vars*)
(floatedLetDecls.push (← `(letDecl|rhs $vars:ident* := $rhs)), (pats, rhs'))
private partial def compileStxMatch (discrs : List Syntax) (alts : List Alt) : TermElabM Syntax := do
trace[Elab.match_syntax]! "match {discrs} with {alts}"
match discrs, alts with
| [], ([], rhs)::_ => pure rhs -- nothing left to match
| _, [] => throwError "non-exhaustive 'match_syntax'"
| discr::discrs, alt::alts => do
let info ← getHeadInfo alt
let pat := alt.1.head!
let alts ← (alt::alts).mapM fun alt => do ((← getHeadInfo alt).onMatch info.check, alt)
let mut yesAlts := #[]
let mut undecidedAlts := #[]
let mut nonExhaustiveAlts := #[]
let mut floatedLetDecls := #[]
for alt in alts do
let mut alt := alt
match alt with
| (covered f exh, alt) =>
-- we can only factor out a common check if there are no undecided patterns in between;
-- otherwise we would change the order of alternatives
if undecidedAlts.isEmpty then
yesAlts ← yesAlts.push <$> f (alt.1.tail!, alt.2)
if !exh then
nonExhaustiveAlts := nonExhaustiveAlts.push alt
else
(floatedLetDecls, alt) ← deduplicate floatedLetDecls alt
undecidedAlts := undecidedAlts.push alt
nonExhaustiveAlts := nonExhaustiveAlts.push alt
| (undecided, alt) =>
(floatedLetDecls, alt) ← deduplicate floatedLetDecls alt
undecidedAlts := undecidedAlts.push alt
nonExhaustiveAlts := nonExhaustiveAlts.push alt
| (uncovered, alt) =>
nonExhaustiveAlts := nonExhaustiveAlts.push alt
let mut stx ← info.doMatch
(yes := fun newDiscrs => do
let mut yesAlts := yesAlts
if !undecidedAlts.isEmpty then
-- group undecided alternatives in a new default case `| discr2, ... => match discr, discr2, ... with ...`
let vars ← discrs.mapM fun _ => withFreshMacroScope `(discr)
let pats := List.replicate newDiscrs.length (Unhygienic.run `(_)) ++ vars
let alts ← undecidedAlts.mapM fun alt => `(matchAltExpr| | $(alt.1.toArray),* => $(alt.2))
let rhs ← `(match discr, $[$(vars.toArray):term],* with $alts:matchAlt*)
yesAlts := yesAlts.push (pats, rhs)
withFreshMacroScope $ compileStxMatch (newDiscrs ++ discrs) yesAlts.toList)
(no := withFreshMacroScope $ compileStxMatch (discr::discrs) nonExhaustiveAlts.toList)
for d in floatedLetDecls do
stx ← `(let* $d:letDecl; $stx)
`(let discr := $discr; $stx)
| _, _ => unreachable!
def match_syntax.expand (stx : Syntax) : TermElabM Syntax := do
match stx with
| `(match $[$discrs:term],* with $[| $[$patss],* => $rhss]*) => do
if !patss.any (·.any (fun
| `($id@$pat) => pat.isQuot
| pat => pat.isQuot)) then
-- no quotations => fall back to regular `match`
throwUnsupportedSyntax
let stx ← compileStxMatch discrs.toList (patss.map (·.toList) |>.zip rhss).toList
trace[Elab.match_syntax.result]! "{stx}"
stx
| _ => throwUnsupportedSyntax
@[builtinTermElab «match»] def elabMatchSyntax : TermElab :=
adaptExpander match_syntax.expand
builtin_initialize
registerTraceClass `Elab.match_syntax
registerTraceClass `Elab.match_syntax.result
end Lean.Elab.Term.Quotation
|
feeb3c8239caf45704179f0a535de0c5abd22c8c | fa02ed5a3c9c0adee3c26887a16855e7841c668b | /src/data/multiset/functor.lean | b545105906f951c03ae8c0fda068e2b7305302ac | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jjgarzella/mathlib | 96a345378c4e0bf26cf604aed84f90329e4896a2 | 395d8716c3ad03747059d482090e2bb97db612c8 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,480,124,379 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 281,190,421 | 2 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,268,170,000 | 1,595,268,169,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,266 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Simon Hudon. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl, Simon Hudon, Kenny Lau
-/
import data.multiset.basic
import control.traversable.lemmas
import control.traversable.instances
/-!
# Functoriality of `multiset`.
-/
universes u
namespace multiset
open list
instance : functor multiset :=
{ map := @map }
@[simp] lemma fmap_def {α' β'} {s : multiset α'} (f : α' → β') : f <$> s = s.map f := rfl
instance : is_lawful_functor multiset :=
by refine { .. }; intros; simp
open is_lawful_traversable is_comm_applicative
variables {F : Type u → Type u} [applicative F] [is_comm_applicative F]
variables {α' β' : Type u} (f : α' → F β')
def traverse : multiset α' → F (multiset β') :=
quotient.lift (functor.map coe ∘ traversable.traverse f)
begin
introv p, unfold function.comp,
induction p,
case perm.nil { refl },
case perm.cons {
have : multiset.cons <$> f p_x <*> (coe <$> traverse f p_l₁) =
multiset.cons <$> f p_x <*> (coe <$> traverse f p_l₂),
{ rw [p_ih] },
simpa with functor_norm },
case perm.swap {
have : (λa b (l:list β'), (↑(a :: b :: l) : multiset β')) <$> f p_y <*> f p_x =
(λa b l, ↑(a :: b :: l)) <$> f p_x <*> f p_y,
{ rw [is_comm_applicative.commutative_map],
congr, funext a b l, simpa [flip] using perm.swap b a l },
simp [(∘), this] with functor_norm },
case perm.trans { simp [*] }
end
instance : monad multiset :=
{ pure := λ α x, x ::ₘ 0,
bind := @bind,
.. multiset.functor }
@[simp] lemma pure_def {α} : (pure : α → multiset α) = (λ x, x ::ₘ 0) := rfl
@[simp] lemma bind_def {α β} : (>>=) = @bind α β := rfl
instance : is_lawful_monad multiset :=
{ bind_pure_comp_eq_map := λ α β f s, multiset.induction_on s rfl $ λ a s ih, by simp,
pure_bind := λ α β x f, by simp,
bind_assoc := @bind_assoc }
open functor
open traversable is_lawful_traversable
@[simp]
lemma lift_coe {α β : Type*} (x : list α) (f : list α → β)
(h : ∀ a b : list α, a ≈ b → f a = f b) :
quotient.lift f h (x : multiset α) = f x :=
quotient.lift_mk _ _ _
@[simp]
lemma map_comp_coe {α β} (h : α → β) :
functor.map h ∘ coe = (coe ∘ functor.map h : list α → multiset β) :=
by funext; simp [functor.map]
lemma id_traverse {α : Type*} (x : multiset α) :
traverse id.mk x = x :=
quotient.induction_on x begin intro, simp [traverse], refl end
lemma comp_traverse {G H : Type* → Type*}
[applicative G] [applicative H]
[is_comm_applicative G] [is_comm_applicative H]
{α β γ : Type*}
(g : α → G β) (h : β → H γ) (x : multiset α) :
traverse (comp.mk ∘ functor.map h ∘ g) x =
comp.mk (functor.map (traverse h) (traverse g x)) :=
quotient.induction_on x
(by intro;
simp [traverse,comp_traverse] with functor_norm;
simp [(<$>),(∘)] with functor_norm)
lemma map_traverse {G : Type* → Type*}
[applicative G] [is_comm_applicative G]
{α β γ : Type*}
(g : α → G β) (h : β → γ)
(x : multiset α) :
functor.map (functor.map h) (traverse g x) =
traverse (functor.map h ∘ g) x :=
quotient.induction_on x
(by intro; simp [traverse] with functor_norm;
rw [is_lawful_functor.comp_map, map_traverse])
lemma traverse_map {G : Type* → Type*}
[applicative G] [is_comm_applicative G]
{α β γ : Type*}
(g : α → β) (h : β → G γ)
(x : multiset α) :
traverse h (map g x) =
traverse (h ∘ g) x :=
quotient.induction_on x
(by intro; simp [traverse];
rw [← traversable.traverse_map h g];
[ refl, apply_instance ])
lemma naturality {G H : Type* → Type*}
[applicative G] [applicative H]
[is_comm_applicative G] [is_comm_applicative H]
(eta : applicative_transformation G H)
{α β : Type*} (f : α → G β) (x : multiset α) :
eta (traverse f x) = traverse (@eta _ ∘ f) x :=
quotient.induction_on x
(by intro; simp [traverse,is_lawful_traversable.naturality] with functor_norm)
end multiset
|
41f09459f0dde018f53ec179dbc1955c32287b65 | a0e23cfdd129a671bf3154ee1a8a3a72bf4c7940 | /tests/lean/run/structInst2.lean | 2de347a0836d941e17dd61ef7f43cb192e5dc9df | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | WojciechKarpiel/lean4 | 7f89706b8e3c1f942b83a2c91a3a00b05da0e65b | f6e1314fa08293dea66a329e05b6c196a0189163 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,633,402,214 | 1,625,821,189,000 | 1,625,821,258,000 | 384,640,886 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,625,903,617,000 | 1,625,903,026,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,516 | lean | import Init.Control.Option
universe u v
def OptionT2 (m : Type u → Type v) (α : Type u) : Type v :=
m (Option α)
namespace OptionT2
variable {m : Type u → Type v} [Monad m] {α β : Type u}
@[inline] protected def bind (ma : OptionT2 m α) (f : α → OptionT2 m β) : OptionT2 m β :=
(do {
let a? ← ma;
(match a? with
| some a => f a
| none => pure none)
} : m (Option β))
@[inline] protected def pure (a : α) : OptionT2 m α :=
(Pure.pure (some a) : m (Option α))
@[inline] protected def orelse (ma : OptionT2 m α) (mb : OptionT2 m α) : OptionT2 m α :=
(do { let a? ← ma;
(match a? with
| some a => pure (some a)
| _ => mb) } : m (Option α))
@[inline] protected def fail : OptionT2 m α :=
(pure none : m (Option α))
end OptionT2
instance optMonad1 {m} [Monad m] : Monad (OptionT2 m) :=
{ pure := OptionT2.pure, bind := OptionT2.bind }
def optMonad2 {m} [Monad m] : Monad (OptionT m) :=
{ pure := OptionT.pure, bind := OptionT.bind }
def optAlt1 {m} [Monad m] : Alternative (OptionT m) :=
{ failure := OptionT.fail,
orElse := OptionT.orElse,
toApplicative := Monad.toApplicative }
def optAlt2 {m} [Monad m] : Alternative (OptionT m) :=
⟨OptionT.fail, OptionT.orElse⟩ -- it works because it treats `toApplicative` as an instance implicit argument
def optAlt3 {m} [Monad m] : Alternative (OptionT2 m) :=
{ failure := OptionT2.fail,
orElse := OptionT2.orelse,
toApplicative := Monad.toApplicative }
|
b2356d9f891287a59f0497a8b3673b9b0ac9aac4 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/algebra/lie/centralizer.lean | eb28c3e542be6801ad12246261e7d5febe15a4d1 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,648 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import algebra.lie.abelian
import algebra.lie.ideal_operations
import algebra.lie.quotient
/-!
# The centralizer of a Lie submodule and the normalizer of a Lie subalgebra.
Given a Lie module `M` over a Lie subalgebra `L`, the centralizer of a Lie submodule `N ⊆ M` is
the Lie submodule with underlying set `{ m | ∀ (x : L), ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ N }`.
The lattice of Lie submodules thus has two natural operations, the centralizer: `N ↦ N.centralizer`
and the ideal operation: `N ↦ ⁅⊤, N⁆`; these are adjoint, i.e., they form a Galois connection. This
adjointness is the reason that we may define nilpotency in terms of either the upper or lower
central series.
Given a Lie subalgebra `H ⊆ L`, we may regard `H` as a Lie submodule of `L` over `H`, and thus
consider the centralizer. This turns out to be a Lie subalgebra and is known as the normalizer.
## Main definitions
* `lie_submodule.centralizer`
* `lie_subalgebra.normalizer`
* `lie_submodule.gc_top_lie_centralizer`
## Tags
lie algebra, centralizer, normalizer
-/
variables {R L M M' : Type*}
variables [comm_ring R] [lie_ring L] [lie_algebra R L]
variables [add_comm_group M] [module R M] [lie_ring_module L M] [lie_module R L M]
variables [add_comm_group M'] [module R M'] [lie_ring_module L M'] [lie_module R L M']
namespace lie_submodule
variables (N : lie_submodule R L M) {N₁ N₂ : lie_submodule R L M}
/-- The centralizer of a Lie submodule. -/
def centralizer : lie_submodule R L M :=
{ carrier := { m | ∀ (x : L), ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ N },
add_mem' := λ m₁ m₂ hm₁ hm₂ x, by { rw lie_add, exact N.add_mem' (hm₁ x) (hm₂ x), },
zero_mem' := λ x, by simp,
smul_mem' := λ t m hm x, by { rw lie_smul, exact N.smul_mem' t (hm x), },
lie_mem := λ x m hm y, by { rw leibniz_lie, exact N.add_mem' (hm ⁅y, x⁆) (N.lie_mem (hm y)), } }
@[simp] lemma mem_centralizer (m : M) :
m ∈ N.centralizer ↔ ∀ (x : L), ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ N :=
iff.rfl
lemma le_centralizer : N ≤ N.centralizer :=
begin
intros m hm,
rw mem_centralizer,
exact λ x, N.lie_mem hm,
end
lemma centralizer_inf :
(N₁ ⊓ N₂).centralizer = N₁.centralizer ⊓ N₂.centralizer :=
by { ext, simp [← forall_and_distrib], }
@[mono] lemma monotone_centalizer :
monotone (centralizer : lie_submodule R L M → lie_submodule R L M) :=
begin
intros N₁ N₂ h m hm,
rw mem_centralizer at hm ⊢,
exact λ x, h (hm x),
end
@[simp] lemma comap_centralizer (f : M' →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M) :
N.centralizer.comap f = (N.comap f).centralizer :=
by { ext, simp, }
lemma top_lie_le_iff_le_centralizer (N' : lie_submodule R L M) :
⁅(⊤ : lie_ideal R L), N⁆ ≤ N' ↔ N ≤ N'.centralizer :=
by { rw lie_le_iff, tauto, }
lemma gc_top_lie_centralizer :
galois_connection (λ N : lie_submodule R L M, ⁅(⊤ : lie_ideal R L), N⁆) centralizer :=
top_lie_le_iff_le_centralizer
variables (R L M)
lemma centralizer_bot_eq_max_triv_submodule :
(⊥ : lie_submodule R L M).centralizer = lie_module.max_triv_submodule R L M :=
rfl
end lie_submodule
namespace lie_subalgebra
variables (H : lie_subalgebra R L)
/-- Regarding a Lie subalgebra `H ⊆ L` as a module over itself, its centralizer is in fact a Lie
subalgebra. This is called the normalizer of the Lie subalgebra. -/
def normalizer : lie_subalgebra R L :=
{ lie_mem' := λ y z hy hz x,
begin
rw [coe_bracket_of_module, mem_to_lie_submodule, leibniz_lie, ← lie_skew y, ← sub_eq_add_neg],
exact H.sub_mem (hz ⟨_, hy x⟩) (hy ⟨_, hz x⟩),
end,
.. H.to_lie_submodule.centralizer }
lemma mem_normalizer_iff' (x : L) : x ∈ H.normalizer ↔ ∀ (y : L), (y ∈ H) → ⁅y, x⁆ ∈ H :=
by { rw subtype.forall', refl, }
lemma mem_normalizer_iff (x : L) : x ∈ H.normalizer ↔ ∀ (y : L), (y ∈ H) → ⁅x, y⁆ ∈ H :=
begin
rw mem_normalizer_iff',
refine forall₂_congr (λ y hy, _),
rw [← lie_skew, neg_mem_iff],
end
lemma le_normalizer : H ≤ H.normalizer := H.to_lie_submodule.le_centralizer
lemma coe_centralizer_eq_normalizer :
(H.to_lie_submodule.centralizer : submodule R L) = H.normalizer :=
rfl
variables {H}
lemma lie_mem_sup_of_mem_normalizer {x y z : L} (hx : x ∈ H.normalizer)
(hy : y ∈ (R ∙ x) ⊔ ↑H) (hz : z ∈ (R ∙ x) ⊔ ↑H) : ⁅y, z⁆ ∈ (R ∙ x) ⊔ ↑H :=
begin
rw submodule.mem_sup at hy hz,
obtain ⟨u₁, hu₁, v, hv : v ∈ H, rfl⟩ := hy,
obtain ⟨u₂, hu₂, w, hw : w ∈ H, rfl⟩ := hz,
obtain ⟨t, rfl⟩ := submodule.mem_span_singleton.mp hu₁,
obtain ⟨s, rfl⟩ := submodule.mem_span_singleton.mp hu₂,
apply submodule.mem_sup_right,
simp only [lie_subalgebra.mem_coe_submodule, smul_lie, add_lie, zero_add, lie_add, smul_zero,
lie_smul, lie_self],
refine H.add_mem (H.smul_mem s _) (H.add_mem (H.smul_mem t _) (H.lie_mem hv hw)),
exacts [(H.mem_normalizer_iff' x).mp hx v hv, (H.mem_normalizer_iff x).mp hx w hw],
end
/-- A Lie subalgebra is an ideal of its normalizer. -/
lemma ideal_in_normalizer {x y : L} (hx : x ∈ H.normalizer) (hy : y ∈ H) : ⁅x,y⁆ ∈ H :=
begin
rw [← lie_skew, neg_mem_iff],
exact hx ⟨y, hy⟩,
end
/-- A Lie subalgebra `H` is an ideal of any Lie subalgebra `K` containing `H` and contained in the
normalizer of `H`. -/
lemma exists_nested_lie_ideal_of_le_normalizer
{K : lie_subalgebra R L} (h₁ : H ≤ K) (h₂ : K ≤ H.normalizer) :
∃ (I : lie_ideal R K), (I : lie_subalgebra R K) = of_le h₁ :=
begin
rw exists_nested_lie_ideal_coe_eq_iff,
exact λ x y hx hy, ideal_in_normalizer (h₂ hx) hy,
end
variables (H)
lemma normalizer_eq_self_iff :
H.normalizer = H ↔ (lie_module.max_triv_submodule R H $ L ⧸ H.to_lie_submodule) = ⊥ :=
begin
rw lie_submodule.eq_bot_iff,
refine ⟨λ h, _, λ h, le_antisymm (λ x hx, _) H.le_normalizer⟩,
{ rintros ⟨x⟩ hx,
suffices : x ∈ H, by simpa,
rw [← h, H.mem_normalizer_iff'],
intros y hy,
replace hx : ⁅_, lie_submodule.quotient.mk' _ x⁆ = 0 := hx ⟨y, hy⟩,
rwa [← lie_module_hom.map_lie, lie_submodule.quotient.mk_eq_zero] at hx, },
{ let y := lie_submodule.quotient.mk' H.to_lie_submodule x,
have hy : y ∈ lie_module.max_triv_submodule R H (L ⧸ H.to_lie_submodule),
{ rintros ⟨z, hz⟩,
rw [← lie_module_hom.map_lie, lie_submodule.quotient.mk_eq_zero, coe_bracket_of_module,
submodule.coe_mk, mem_to_lie_submodule],
exact (H.mem_normalizer_iff' x).mp hx z hz, },
simpa using h y hy, },
end
end lie_subalgebra
|
c38d4b330ba7d71fff7a3d707c21e54d40990730 | cf39355caa609c0f33405126beee2739aa3cb77e | /tests/lean/list_local_vars.lean | 0e5dbb907bb8be66a6233af49a2183ec5e36c286 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/lean | 12b87f69d92e614daea8bcc9d4de9a9ace089d0e | cce7990ea86a78bdb383e38ed7f9b5ba93c60ce0 | refs/heads/master | 1,687,508,156,644 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 169,960,991 | 457 | 107 | Apache-2.0 | 1,686,744,372,000 | 1,549,790,268,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,996 | lean | -- #exit
open interactive tactic.interactive
namespace tactic.interactive
open lean.parser
meta def tac (ls : parse lean.parser.list_include_var_names) : tactic unit :=
trace ls
open interactive.types
@[user_command]
meta def tac_cmd (_ : parse $ tk "stuff") : lean.parser unit :=
with_local_scope $
do ls ← lean.parser.list_available_include_vars,
trace ls,
ls ← lean.parser.list_include_var_names,
(n,t) ← brackets "(" ")" (prod.mk <$> (ident <* tk ":") <*> texpr),
t ← tactic.to_expr t,
v ← tactic.mk_local_def n t,
lean.parser.add_local v,
(n',t') ← brackets "(" ")" (prod.mk <$> (ident <* tk ":") <*> texpr),
t' ← tactic.to_expr t',
v ← tactic.mk_local_def n' t',
lean.parser.add_local v,
include_var v.local_pp_name,
trace ls,
ls ← tactic.local_context,
trace ls,
brackets "(" ")" texpr,
↑(ls.mmap' $ trace ∘ to_string)
@[user_command]
meta def add_var_cmd (_ : parse $ tk "add_var") : lean.parser unit :=
do (n,t) ← brackets "(" ")" (prod.mk <$> (ident <* tk ":") <*> texpr),
t ← tactic.to_expr t,
v ← tactic.mk_local_def n t,
add_local_level `u,
lean.parser.add_local v,
include_var v.local_pp_name,
(n',t') ← brackets "(" ")" (prod.mk <$> (ident <* tk ":") <*> texpr),
t' ← tactic.to_expr t',
v ← tactic.mk_local_def n' t',
lean.parser.add_local v,
include_var v.local_pp_name,
omit_var v.local_pp_name,
ls ← lean.parser.list_include_var_names,
-- trace ls,
trace_state
end tactic.interactive
variables (a b c : ℕ)
include a b
variables {α : Type}
section
stuff (β : Type) (γ : Type) (α × β × γ)
def x := β
def y := γ
#check x
section
add_var (β : Type) (γ : Type u)
def x' : β → β := id
def y' : γ → γ := id
end
def x'' := β
def y'' := γ
#check x'
#check y'
section
parameter δ : Type
#print δ
#print β
end
#print γ
end
example : c ≤ 3 :=
begin
(do v ← tactic.get_local `a,
trace $ v.local_pp_name ),
tac
end
|
551280518cedee43fd6d77873712d136a3d2cd75 | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/analysis/calculus/cont_diff.lean | 1cd0fd7da5153a0d787a33fb33af669b336ee300 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 143,605 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import analysis.calculus.mean_value
import analysis.normed_space.multilinear
import analysis.calculus.formal_multilinear_series
/-!
# Higher differentiability
A function is `C^1` on a domain if it is differentiable there, and its derivative is continuous.
By induction, it is `C^n` if it is `C^{n-1}` and its (n-1)-th derivative is `C^1` there or,
equivalently, if it is `C^1` and its derivative is `C^{n-1}`.
Finally, it is `C^∞` if it is `C^n` for all n.
We formalize these notions by defining iteratively the `n+1`-th derivative of a function as the
derivative of the `n`-th derivative. It is called `iterated_fderiv 𝕜 n f x` where `𝕜` is the
field, `n` is the number of iterations, `f` is the function and `x` is the point, and it is given
as an `n`-multilinear map. We also define a version `iterated_fderiv_within` relative to a domain,
as well as predicates `cont_diff_within_at`, `cont_diff_at`, `cont_diff_on` and
`cont_diff` saying that the function is `C^n` within a set at a point, at a point, on a set
and on the whole space respectively.
To avoid the issue of choice when choosing a derivative in sets where the derivative is not
necessarily unique, `cont_diff_on` is not defined directly in terms of the
regularity of the specific choice `iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 n f s` inside `s`, but in terms of the
existence of a nice sequence of derivatives, expressed with a predicate
`has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on`.
We prove basic properties of these notions.
## Main definitions and results
Let `f : E → F` be a map between normed vector spaces over a nondiscrete normed field `𝕜`.
* `has_ftaylor_series_up_to n f p`: expresses that the formal multilinear series `p` is a sequence
of iterated derivatives of `f`, up to the `n`-th term (where `n` is a natural number or `∞`).
* `has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on n f p s`: same thing, but inside a set `s`. The notion of derivative
is now taken inside `s`. In particular, derivatives don't have to be unique.
* `cont_diff 𝕜 n f`: expresses that `f` is `C^n`, i.e., it admits a Taylor series up to
rank `n`.
* `cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s`: expresses that `f` is `C^n` in `s`.
* `cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f x`: expresses that `f` is `C^n` around `x`.
* `cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x`: expresses that `f` is `C^n` around `x` within the set `s`.
* `iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 n f s x` is an `n`-th derivative of `f` over the field `𝕜` on the
set `s` at the point `x`. It is a continuous multilinear map from `E^n` to `F`, defined as a
derivative within `s` of `iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 (n-1) f s` if one exists, and `0` otherwise.
* `iterated_fderiv 𝕜 n f x` is the `n`-th derivative of `f` over the field `𝕜` at the point `x`.
It is a continuous multilinear map from `E^n` to `F`, defined as a derivative of
`iterated_fderiv 𝕜 (n-1) f` if one exists, and `0` otherwise.
In sets of unique differentiability, `cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s` can be expressed in terms of the
properties of `iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 m f s` for `m ≤ n`. In the whole space,
`cont_diff 𝕜 n f` can be expressed in terms of the properties of `iterated_fderiv 𝕜 m f`
for `m ≤ n`.
We also prove that the usual operations (addition, multiplication, difference, composition, and
so on) preserve `C^n` functions.
## Implementation notes
The definitions in this file are designed to work on any field `𝕜`. They are sometimes slightly more
complicated than the naive definitions one would guess from the intuition over the real or complex
numbers, but they are designed to circumvent the lack of gluing properties and partitions of unity
in general. In the usual situations, they coincide with the usual definitions.
### Definition of `C^n` functions in domains
One could define `C^n` functions in a domain `s` by fixing an arbitrary choice of derivatives (this
is what we do with `iterated_fderiv_within`) and requiring that all these derivatives up to `n` are
continuous. If the derivative is not unique, this could lead to strange behavior like two `C^n`
functions `f` and `g` on `s` whose sum is not `C^n`. A better definition is thus to say that a
function is `C^n` inside `s` if it admits a sequence of derivatives up to `n` inside `s`.
This definition still has the problem that a function which is locally `C^n` would not need to
be `C^n`, as different choices of sequences of derivatives around different points might possibly
not be glued together to give a globally defined sequence of derivatives. (Note that this issue
can not happen over reals, thanks to partition of unity, but the behavior over a general field is
not so clear, and we want a definition for general fields). Also, there are locality
problems for the order parameter: one could image a function which, for each `n`, has a nice
sequence of derivatives up to order `n`, but they do not coincide for varying `n` and can therefore
not be glued to give rise to an infinite sequence of derivatives. This would give a function
which is `C^n` for all `n`, but not `C^∞`. We solve this issue by putting locality conditions
in space and order in our definition of `cont_diff_within_at` and `cont_diff_on`.
The resulting definition is slightly more complicated to work with (in fact not so much), but it
gives rise to completely satisfactory theorems.
For instance, with this definition, a real function which is `C^m` (but not better) on `(-1/m, 1/m)`
for each natural `m` is by definition `C^∞` at `0`.
There is another issue with the definition of `cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x`. We can
require the existence and good behavior of derivatives up to order `n` on a neighborhood of `x`
within `s`. However, this does not imply continuity or differentiability within `s` of the function
at `x` when `x` does not belong to `s`. Therefore, we require such existence and good behavior on
a neighborhood of `x` within `s ∪ {x}` (which appears as `insert x s` in this file).
### Side of the composition, and universe issues
With a naïve direct definition, the `n`-th derivative of a function belongs to the space
`E →L[𝕜] (E →L[𝕜] (E ... F)...)))` where there are n iterations of `E →L[𝕜]`. This space
may also be seen as the space of continuous multilinear functions on `n` copies of `E` with
values in `F`, by uncurrying. This is the point of view that is usually adopted in textbooks,
and that we also use. This means that the definition and the first proofs are slightly involved,
as one has to keep track of the uncurrying operation. The uncurrying can be done from the
left or from the right, amounting to defining the `n+1`-th derivative either as the derivative of
the `n`-th derivative, or as the `n`-th derivative of the derivative.
For proofs, it would be more convenient to use the latter approach (from the right),
as it means to prove things at the `n+1`-th step we only need to understand well enough the
derivative in `E →L[𝕜] F` (contrary to the approach from the left, where one would need to know
enough on the `n`-th derivative to deduce things on the `n+1`-th derivative).
However, the definition from the right leads to a universe polymorphism problem: if we define
`iterated_fderiv 𝕜 (n + 1) f x = iterated_fderiv 𝕜 n (fderiv 𝕜 f) x` by induction, we need to
generalize over all spaces (as `f` and `fderiv 𝕜 f` don't take values in the same space). It is
only possible to generalize over all spaces in some fixed universe in an inductive definition.
For `f : E → F`, then `fderiv 𝕜 f` is a map `E → (E →L[𝕜] F)`. Therefore, the definition will only
work if `F` and `E →L[𝕜] F` are in the same universe.
This issue does not appear with the definition from the left, where one does not need to generalize
over all spaces. Therefore, we use the definition from the left. This means some proofs later on
become a little bit more complicated: to prove that a function is `C^n`, the most efficient approach
is to exhibit a formula for its `n`-th derivative and prove it is continuous (contrary to the
inductive approach where one would prove smoothness statements without giving a formula for the
derivative). In the end, this approach is still satisfactory as it is good to have formulas for the
iterated derivatives in various constructions.
One point where we depart from this explicit approach is in the proof of smoothness of a
composition: there is a formula for the `n`-th derivative of a composition (Faà di Bruno's formula),
but it is very complicated and barely usable, while the inductive proof is very simple. Thus, we
give the inductive proof. As explained above, it works by generalizing over the target space, hence
it only works well if all spaces belong to the same universe. To get the general version, we lift
things to a common universe using a trick.
### Variables management
The textbook definitions and proofs use various identifications and abuse of notations, for instance
when saying that the natural space in which the derivative lives, i.e.,
`E →L[𝕜] (E →L[𝕜] ( ... →L[𝕜] F))`, is the same as a space of multilinear maps. When doing things
formally, we need to provide explicit maps for these identifications, and chase some diagrams to see
everything is compatible with the identifications. In particular, one needs to check that taking the
derivative and then doing the identification, or first doing the identification and then taking the
derivative, gives the same result. The key point for this is that taking the derivative commutes
with continuous linear equivalences. Therefore, we need to implement all our identifications with
continuous linear equivs.
## Notations
We use the notation `E [×n]→L[𝕜] F` for the space of continuous multilinear maps on `E^n` with
values in `F`. This is the space in which the `n`-th derivative of a function from `E` to `F` lives.
In this file, we denote `⊤ : with_top ℕ` with `∞`.
## Tags
derivative, differentiability, higher derivative, `C^n`, multilinear, Taylor series, formal series
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical big_operators nnreal
local notation `∞` := (⊤ : with_top ℕ)
universes u v w
local attribute [instance, priority 1001]
normed_group.to_add_comm_group normed_space.to_module' add_comm_group.to_add_comm_monoid
open set fin filter
open_locale topological_space
variables {𝕜 : Type*} [nondiscrete_normed_field 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E]
{F : Type*} [normed_group F] [normed_space 𝕜 F]
{G : Type*} [normed_group G] [normed_space 𝕜 G]
{s s₁ t u : set E} {f f₁ : E → F} {g : F → G} {x : E} {c : F}
{b : E × F → G} {m n : with_top ℕ}
/-! ### Functions with a Taylor series on a domain -/
variable {p : E → formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F}
/-- `has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on n f p s` registers the fact that `p 0 = f` and `p (m+1)` is a
derivative of `p m` for `m < n`, and is continuous for `m ≤ n`. This is a predicate analogous to
`has_fderiv_within_at` but for higher order derivatives. -/
structure has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on (n : with_top ℕ)
(f : E → F) (p : E → formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) (s : set E) : Prop :=
(zero_eq : ∀ x ∈ s, (p x 0).uncurry0 = f x)
(fderiv_within : ∀ (m : ℕ) (hm : (m : with_top ℕ) < n), ∀ x ∈ s,
has_fderiv_within_at (λ y, p y m) (p x m.succ).curry_left s x)
(cont : ∀ (m : ℕ) (hm : (m : with_top ℕ) ≤ n), continuous_on (λ x, p x m) s)
lemma has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on.zero_eq'
(h : has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on n f p s) {x : E} (hx : x ∈ s) :
p x 0 = (continuous_multilinear_curry_fin0 𝕜 E F).symm (f x) :=
by { rw ← h.zero_eq x hx, symmetry, exact continuous_multilinear_map.uncurry0_curry0 _ }
/-- If two functions coincide on a set `s`, then a Taylor series for the first one is as well a
Taylor series for the second one. -/
lemma has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on.congr
(h : has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on n f p s) (h₁ : ∀ x ∈ s, f₁ x = f x) :
has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on n f₁ p s :=
begin
refine ⟨λ x hx, _, h.fderiv_within, h.cont⟩,
rw h₁ x hx,
exact h.zero_eq x hx
end
lemma has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on.mono
(h : has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on n f p s) {t : set E} (hst : t ⊆ s) :
has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on n f p t :=
⟨λ x hx, h.zero_eq x (hst hx),
λ m hm x hx, (h.fderiv_within m hm x (hst hx)).mono hst,
λ m hm, (h.cont m hm).mono hst⟩
lemma has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on.of_le
(h : has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on n f p s) (hmn : m ≤ n) :
has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on m f p s :=
⟨h.zero_eq,
λ k hk x hx, h.fderiv_within k (lt_of_lt_of_le hk hmn) x hx,
λ k hk, h.cont k (le_trans hk hmn)⟩
lemma has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on.continuous_on
(h : has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on n f p s) : continuous_on f s :=
begin
have := (h.cont 0 bot_le).congr (λ x hx, (h.zero_eq' hx).symm),
rwa linear_isometry_equiv.comp_continuous_on_iff at this
end
lemma has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on_zero_iff :
has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on 0 f p s ↔ continuous_on f s ∧ (∀ x ∈ s, (p x 0).uncurry0 = f x) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ H, ⟨H.continuous_on, H.zero_eq⟩,
λ H, ⟨H.2, λ m hm, false.elim (not_le.2 hm bot_le), _⟩⟩,
assume m hm,
obtain rfl : m = 0, by exact_mod_cast (hm.antisymm (zero_le _)),
have : ∀ x ∈ s, p x 0 = (continuous_multilinear_curry_fin0 𝕜 E F).symm (f x),
by { assume x hx, rw ← H.2 x hx, symmetry, exact continuous_multilinear_map.uncurry0_curry0 _ },
rw [continuous_on_congr this, linear_isometry_equiv.comp_continuous_on_iff],
exact H.1
end
lemma has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on_top_iff :
(has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on ∞ f p s) ↔ (∀ (n : ℕ), has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on n f p s) :=
begin
split,
{ assume H n, exact H.of_le le_top },
{ assume H,
split,
{ exact (H 0).zero_eq },
{ assume m hm,
apply (H m.succ).fderiv_within m (with_top.coe_lt_coe.2 (lt_add_one m)) },
{ assume m hm,
apply (H m).cont m le_rfl } }
end
/-- If a function has a Taylor series at order at least `1`, then the term of order `1` of this
series is a derivative of `f`. -/
lemma has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on.has_fderiv_within_at
(h : has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on n f p s) (hn : 1 ≤ n) (hx : x ∈ s) :
has_fderiv_within_at f (continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1 𝕜 E F (p x 1)) s x :=
begin
have A : ∀ y ∈ s, f y = (continuous_multilinear_curry_fin0 𝕜 E F) (p y 0),
{ assume y hy, rw ← h.zero_eq y hy, refl },
suffices H : has_fderiv_within_at
(λ y, continuous_multilinear_curry_fin0 𝕜 E F (p y 0))
(continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1 𝕜 E F (p x 1)) s x,
by exact H.congr A (A x hx),
rw linear_isometry_equiv.comp_has_fderiv_within_at_iff',
have : ((0 : ℕ) : with_top ℕ) < n :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (with_top.coe_lt_coe.2 nat.zero_lt_one) hn,
convert h.fderiv_within _ this x hx,
ext y v,
change (p x 1) (snoc 0 y) = (p x 1) (cons y v),
unfold_coes,
congr' with i,
rw unique.eq_default i,
refl
end
lemma has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on.differentiable_on
(h : has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on n f p s) (hn : 1 ≤ n) : differentiable_on 𝕜 f s :=
λ x hx, (h.has_fderiv_within_at hn hx).differentiable_within_at
/-- If a function has a Taylor series at order at least `1` on a neighborhood of `x`, then the term
of order `1` of this series is a derivative of `f` at `x`. -/
lemma has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on.has_fderiv_at
(h : has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on n f p s) (hn : 1 ≤ n) (hx : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
has_fderiv_at f (continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1 𝕜 E F (p x 1)) x :=
(h.has_fderiv_within_at hn (mem_of_mem_nhds hx)).has_fderiv_at hx
/-- If a function has a Taylor series at order at least `1` on a neighborhood of `x`, then
in a neighborhood of `x`, the term of order `1` of this series is a derivative of `f`. -/
lemma has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on.eventually_has_fderiv_at
(h : has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on n f p s) (hn : 1 ≤ n) (hx : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, has_fderiv_at f (continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1 𝕜 E F (p y 1)) y :=
(eventually_eventually_nhds.2 hx).mono $ λ y hy, h.has_fderiv_at hn hy
/-- If a function has a Taylor series at order at least `1` on a neighborhood of `x`, then
it is differentiable at `x`. -/
lemma has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on.differentiable_at
(h : has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on n f p s) (hn : 1 ≤ n) (hx : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
differentiable_at 𝕜 f x :=
(h.has_fderiv_at hn hx).differentiable_at
/-- `p` is a Taylor series of `f` up to `n+1` if and only if `p` is a Taylor series up to `n`, and
`p (n + 1)` is a derivative of `p n`. -/
theorem has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on_succ_iff_left {n : ℕ} :
has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on (n + 1) f p s ↔
has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on n f p s
∧ (∀ x ∈ s, has_fderiv_within_at (λ y, p y n) (p x n.succ).curry_left s x)
∧ continuous_on (λ x, p x (n + 1)) s :=
begin
split,
{ assume h,
exact ⟨h.of_le (with_top.coe_le_coe.2 (nat.le_succ n)),
h.fderiv_within _ (with_top.coe_lt_coe.2 (lt_add_one n)),
h.cont (n + 1) le_rfl⟩ },
{ assume h,
split,
{ exact h.1.zero_eq },
{ assume m hm,
by_cases h' : m < n,
{ exact h.1.fderiv_within m (with_top.coe_lt_coe.2 h') },
{ have : m = n := nat.eq_of_lt_succ_of_not_lt (with_top.coe_lt_coe.1 hm) h',
rw this,
exact h.2.1 } },
{ assume m hm,
by_cases h' : m ≤ n,
{ apply h.1.cont m (with_top.coe_le_coe.2 h') },
{ have : m = (n + 1) := le_antisymm (with_top.coe_le_coe.1 hm) (not_le.1 h'),
rw this,
exact h.2.2 } } }
end
/-- `p` is a Taylor series of `f` up to `n+1` if and only if `p.shift` is a Taylor series up to `n`
for `p 1`, which is a derivative of `f`. -/
theorem has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on_succ_iff_right {n : ℕ} :
has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on ((n + 1) : ℕ) f p s ↔
(∀ x ∈ s, (p x 0).uncurry0 = f x)
∧ (∀ x ∈ s, has_fderiv_within_at (λ y, p y 0) (p x 1).curry_left s x)
∧ has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on n
(λ x, continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1 𝕜 E F (p x 1)) (λ x, (p x).shift) s :=
begin
split,
{ assume H,
refine ⟨H.zero_eq, H.fderiv_within 0 (with_top.coe_lt_coe.2 (nat.succ_pos n)), _⟩,
split,
{ assume x hx, refl },
{ assume m (hm : (m : with_top ℕ) < n) x (hx : x ∈ s),
have A : (m.succ : with_top ℕ) < n.succ,
by { rw with_top.coe_lt_coe at ⊢ hm, exact nat.lt_succ_iff.mpr hm },
change has_fderiv_within_at
((continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv' 𝕜 m E F).symm
∘ (λ (y : E), p y m.succ))
(p x m.succ.succ).curry_right.curry_left s x,
rw linear_isometry_equiv.comp_has_fderiv_within_at_iff',
convert H.fderiv_within _ A x hx,
ext y v,
change (p x m.succ.succ) (snoc (cons y (init v)) (v (last _)))
= (p x (nat.succ (nat.succ m))) (cons y v),
rw [← cons_snoc_eq_snoc_cons, snoc_init_self] },
{ assume m (hm : (m : with_top ℕ) ≤ n),
have A : (m.succ : with_top ℕ) ≤ n.succ,
by { rw with_top.coe_le_coe at ⊢ hm, exact nat.pred_le_iff.mp hm },
change continuous_on ((continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv' 𝕜 m E F).symm
∘ (λ (y : E), p y m.succ)) s,
rw linear_isometry_equiv.comp_continuous_on_iff,
exact H.cont _ A } },
{ rintros ⟨Hzero_eq, Hfderiv_zero, Htaylor⟩,
split,
{ exact Hzero_eq },
{ assume m (hm : (m : with_top ℕ) < n.succ) x (hx : x ∈ s),
cases m,
{ exact Hfderiv_zero x hx },
{ have A : (m : with_top ℕ) < n,
by { rw with_top.coe_lt_coe at hm ⊢, exact nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ hm },
have : has_fderiv_within_at ((continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv' 𝕜 m E F).symm
∘ (λ (y : E), p y m.succ)) ((p x).shift m.succ).curry_left s x :=
Htaylor.fderiv_within _ A x hx,
rw linear_isometry_equiv.comp_has_fderiv_within_at_iff' at this,
convert this,
ext y v,
change (p x (nat.succ (nat.succ m))) (cons y v)
= (p x m.succ.succ) (snoc (cons y (init v)) (v (last _))),
rw [← cons_snoc_eq_snoc_cons, snoc_init_self] } },
{ assume m (hm : (m : with_top ℕ) ≤ n.succ),
cases m,
{ have : differentiable_on 𝕜 (λ x, p x 0) s :=
λ x hx, (Hfderiv_zero x hx).differentiable_within_at,
exact this.continuous_on },
{ have A : (m : with_top ℕ) ≤ n,
by { rw with_top.coe_le_coe at hm ⊢, exact nat.lt_succ_iff.mp hm },
have : continuous_on ((continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv' 𝕜 m E F).symm
∘ (λ (y : E), p y m.succ)) s :=
Htaylor.cont _ A,
rwa linear_isometry_equiv.comp_continuous_on_iff at this } } }
end
/-! ### Smooth functions within a set around a point -/
variable (𝕜)
/-- A function is continuously differentiable up to order `n` within a set `s` at a point `x` if
it admits continuous derivatives up to order `n` in a neighborhood of `x` in `s ∪ {x}`.
For `n = ∞`, we only require that this holds up to any finite order (where the neighborhood may
depend on the finite order we consider).
For instance, a real function which is `C^m` on `(-1/m, 1/m)` for each natural `m`, but not
better, is `C^∞` at `0` within `univ`.
-/
def cont_diff_within_at (n : with_top ℕ) (f : E → F) (s : set E) (x : E) :=
∀ (m : ℕ), (m : with_top ℕ) ≤ n →
∃ u ∈ 𝓝[insert x s] x, ∃ p : E → formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F,
has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on m f p u
variable {𝕜}
lemma cont_diff_within_at_nat {n : ℕ} :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x ↔
∃ u ∈ 𝓝[insert x s] x, ∃ p : E → formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F,
has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on n f p u :=
⟨λ H, H n le_rfl, λ ⟨u, hu, p, hp⟩ m hm, ⟨u, hu, p, hp.of_le hm⟩⟩
lemma cont_diff_within_at.of_le
(h : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x) (hmn : m ≤ n) :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 m f s x :=
λ k hk, h k (le_trans hk hmn)
lemma cont_diff_within_at_iff_forall_nat_le :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x ↔ ∀ m : ℕ, ↑m ≤ n → cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 m f s x :=
⟨λ H m hm, H.of_le hm, λ H m hm, H m hm _ le_rfl⟩
lemma cont_diff_within_at_top :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 ∞ f s x ↔ ∀ (n : ℕ), cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x :=
cont_diff_within_at_iff_forall_nat_le.trans $ by simp only [forall_prop_of_true, le_top]
lemma cont_diff_within_at.continuous_within_at
(h : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x) : continuous_within_at f s x :=
begin
rcases h 0 bot_le with ⟨u, hu, p, H⟩,
rw [mem_nhds_within_insert] at hu,
exact (H.continuous_on.continuous_within_at hu.1).mono_of_mem hu.2
end
lemma cont_diff_within_at.congr_of_eventually_eq
(h : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x) (h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : f₁ x = f x) :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f₁ s x :=
λ m hm, let ⟨u, hu, p, H⟩ := h m hm in
⟨{x ∈ u | f₁ x = f x}, filter.inter_mem hu (mem_nhds_within_insert.2 ⟨hx, h₁⟩), p,
(H.mono (sep_subset _ _)).congr (λ _, and.right)⟩
lemma cont_diff_within_at.congr_of_eventually_eq'
(h : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x) (h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : x ∈ s) :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f₁ s x :=
h.congr_of_eventually_eq h₁ $ h₁.self_of_nhds_within hx
lemma filter.eventually_eq.cont_diff_within_at_iff
(h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : f₁ x = f x) :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f₁ s x ↔ cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x :=
⟨λ H, cont_diff_within_at.congr_of_eventually_eq H h₁.symm hx.symm,
λ H, H.congr_of_eventually_eq h₁ hx⟩
lemma cont_diff_within_at.congr
(h : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x) (h₁ : ∀ y ∈ s, f₁ y = f y) (hx : f₁ x = f x) :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f₁ s x :=
h.congr_of_eventually_eq (filter.eventually_eq_of_mem self_mem_nhds_within h₁) hx
lemma cont_diff_within_at.congr'
(h : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x) (h₁ : ∀ y ∈ s, f₁ y = f y) (hx : x ∈ s) :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f₁ s x :=
h.congr h₁ (h₁ _ hx)
lemma cont_diff_within_at.mono_of_mem
(h : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x) {t : set E} (hst : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x) :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f t x :=
begin
assume m hm,
rcases h m hm with ⟨u, hu, p, H⟩,
exact ⟨u, nhds_within_le_of_mem (insert_mem_nhds_within_insert hst) hu, p, H⟩
end
lemma cont_diff_within_at.mono
(h : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x) {t : set E} (hst : t ⊆ s) :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f t x :=
h.mono_of_mem $ filter.mem_of_superset self_mem_nhds_within hst
lemma cont_diff_within_at.congr_nhds
(h : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x) {t : set E} (hst : 𝓝[s] x = 𝓝[t] x) :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f t x :=
h.mono_of_mem $ hst ▸ self_mem_nhds_within
lemma cont_diff_within_at_congr_nhds {t : set E} (hst : 𝓝[s] x = 𝓝[t] x) :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x ↔ cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f t x :=
⟨λ h, h.congr_nhds hst, λ h, h.congr_nhds hst.symm⟩
lemma cont_diff_within_at_inter' (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f (s ∩ t) x ↔ cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x :=
cont_diff_within_at_congr_nhds $ eq.symm $ nhds_within_restrict'' _ h
lemma cont_diff_within_at_inter (h : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f (s ∩ t) x ↔ cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x :=
cont_diff_within_at_inter' (mem_nhds_within_of_mem_nhds h)
/-- If a function is `C^n` within a set at a point, with `n ≥ 1`, then it is differentiable
within this set at this point. -/
lemma cont_diff_within_at.differentiable_within_at'
(h : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f (insert x s) x :=
begin
rcases h 1 hn with ⟨u, hu, p, H⟩,
rcases mem_nhds_within.1 hu with ⟨t, t_open, xt, tu⟩,
rw inter_comm at tu,
have := ((H.mono tu).differentiable_on le_rfl) x ⟨mem_insert x s, xt⟩,
exact (differentiable_within_at_inter (is_open.mem_nhds t_open xt)).1 this,
end
lemma cont_diff_within_at.differentiable_within_at
(h : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
differentiable_within_at 𝕜 f s x :=
(h.differentiable_within_at' hn).mono (subset_insert x s)
/-- A function is `C^(n + 1)` on a domain iff locally, it has a derivative which is `C^n`. -/
theorem cont_diff_within_at_succ_iff_has_fderiv_within_at {n : ℕ} :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 ((n + 1) : ℕ) f s x
↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝[insert x s] x, ∃ f' : E → (E →L[𝕜] F),
(∀ x ∈ u, has_fderiv_within_at f (f' x) u x) ∧ (cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f' u x) :=
begin
split,
{ assume h,
rcases h n.succ le_rfl with ⟨u, hu, p, Hp⟩,
refine ⟨u, hu, λ y, (continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1 𝕜 E F) (p y 1),
λ y hy, Hp.has_fderiv_within_at (with_top.coe_le_coe.2 (nat.le_add_left 1 n)) hy, _⟩,
assume m hm,
refine ⟨u, _, λ (y : E), (p y).shift, _⟩,
{ convert self_mem_nhds_within,
have : x ∈ insert x s, by simp,
exact (insert_eq_of_mem (mem_of_mem_nhds_within this hu)) },
{ rw has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on_succ_iff_right at Hp,
exact Hp.2.2.of_le hm } },
{ rintros ⟨u, hu, f', f'_eq_deriv, Hf'⟩,
rw cont_diff_within_at_nat,
rcases Hf' n le_rfl with ⟨v, hv, p', Hp'⟩,
refine ⟨v ∩ u, _, λ x, (p' x).unshift (f x), _⟩,
{ apply filter.inter_mem _ hu,
apply nhds_within_le_of_mem hu,
exact nhds_within_mono _ (subset_insert x u) hv },
{ rw has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on_succ_iff_right,
refine ⟨λ y hy, rfl, λ y hy, _, _⟩,
{ change has_fderiv_within_at (λ z, (continuous_multilinear_curry_fin0 𝕜 E F).symm (f z))
((formal_multilinear_series.unshift (p' y) (f y) 1).curry_left) (v ∩ u) y,
rw linear_isometry_equiv.comp_has_fderiv_within_at_iff',
convert (f'_eq_deriv y hy.2).mono (inter_subset_right v u),
rw ← Hp'.zero_eq y hy.1,
ext z,
change ((p' y 0) (init (@cons 0 (λ i, E) z 0))) (@cons 0 (λ i, E) z 0 (last 0))
= ((p' y 0) 0) z,
unfold_coes,
congr },
{ convert (Hp'.mono (inter_subset_left v u)).congr (λ x hx, Hp'.zero_eq x hx.1),
{ ext x y,
change p' x 0 (init (@snoc 0 (λ i : fin 1, E) 0 y)) y = p' x 0 0 y,
rw init_snoc },
{ ext x k v y,
change p' x k (init (@snoc k (λ i : fin k.succ, E) v y))
(@snoc k (λ i : fin k.succ, E) v y (last k)) = p' x k v y,
rw [snoc_last, init_snoc] } } } }
end
/-! ### Smooth functions within a set -/
variable (𝕜)
/-- A function is continuously differentiable up to `n` on `s` if, for any point `x` in `s`, it
admits continuous derivatives up to order `n` on a neighborhood of `x` in `s`.
For `n = ∞`, we only require that this holds up to any finite order (where the neighborhood may
depend on the finite order we consider).
-/
definition cont_diff_on (n : with_top ℕ) (f : E → F) (s : set E) :=
∀ x ∈ s, cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x
variable {𝕜}
lemma cont_diff_on.cont_diff_within_at (h : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x :=
h x hx
lemma cont_diff_within_at.cont_diff_on {m : ℕ}
(hm : (m : with_top ℕ) ≤ n) (h : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x) :
∃ u ∈ 𝓝[insert x s] x, u ⊆ insert x s ∧ cont_diff_on 𝕜 m f u :=
begin
rcases h m hm with ⟨u, u_nhd, p, hp⟩,
refine ⟨u ∩ insert x s, filter.inter_mem u_nhd self_mem_nhds_within,
inter_subset_right _ _, _⟩,
assume y hy m' hm',
refine ⟨u ∩ insert x s, _, p, (hp.mono (inter_subset_left _ _)).of_le hm'⟩,
convert self_mem_nhds_within,
exact insert_eq_of_mem hy
end
protected lemma cont_diff_within_at.eventually {n : ℕ}
(h : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[insert x s] x, cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s y :=
begin
rcases h.cont_diff_on le_rfl with ⟨u, hu, hu_sub, hd⟩,
have : ∀ᶠ (y : E) in 𝓝[insert x s] x, u ∈ 𝓝[insert x s] y ∧ y ∈ u,
from (eventually_nhds_within_nhds_within.2 hu).and hu,
refine this.mono (λ y hy, (hd y hy.2).mono_of_mem _),
exact nhds_within_mono y (subset_insert _ _) hy.1
end
lemma cont_diff_on.of_le (h : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s) (hmn : m ≤ n) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 m f s :=
λ x hx, (h x hx).of_le hmn
lemma cont_diff_on_iff_forall_nat_le :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s ↔ ∀ m : ℕ, ↑m ≤ n → cont_diff_on 𝕜 m f s :=
⟨λ H m hm, H.of_le hm, λ H x hx m hm, H m hm x hx m le_rfl⟩
lemma cont_diff_on_top :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 ∞ f s ↔ ∀ (n : ℕ), cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s :=
cont_diff_on_iff_forall_nat_le.trans $ by simp only [le_top, forall_prop_of_true]
lemma cont_diff_on_all_iff_nat :
(∀ n, cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s) ↔ (∀ n : ℕ, cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ H n, H n, _⟩,
rintro H (_|n),
exacts [cont_diff_on_top.2 H, H n]
end
lemma cont_diff_on.continuous_on
(h : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s) : continuous_on f s :=
λ x hx, (h x hx).continuous_within_at
lemma cont_diff_on.congr
(h : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s) (h₁ : ∀ x ∈ s, f₁ x = f x) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f₁ s :=
λ x hx, (h x hx).congr h₁ (h₁ x hx)
lemma cont_diff_on_congr (h₁ : ∀ x ∈ s, f₁ x = f x) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f₁ s ↔ cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s :=
⟨λ H, H.congr (λ x hx, (h₁ x hx).symm), λ H, H.congr h₁⟩
lemma cont_diff_on.mono
(h : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s) {t : set E} (hst : t ⊆ s) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f t :=
λ x hx, (h x (hst hx)).mono hst
lemma cont_diff_on.congr_mono
(hf : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s) (h₁ : ∀ x ∈ s₁, f₁ x = f x) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f₁ s₁ :=
(hf.mono hs).congr h₁
/-- If a function is `C^n` on a set with `n ≥ 1`, then it is differentiable there. -/
lemma cont_diff_on.differentiable_on
(h : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s) (hn : 1 ≤ n) : differentiable_on 𝕜 f s :=
λ x hx, (h x hx).differentiable_within_at hn
/-- If a function is `C^n` around each point in a set, then it is `C^n` on the set. -/
lemma cont_diff_on_of_locally_cont_diff_on
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃u, is_open u ∧ x ∈ u ∧ cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f (s ∩ u)) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s :=
begin
assume x xs,
rcases h x xs with ⟨u, u_open, xu, hu⟩,
apply (cont_diff_within_at_inter _).1 (hu x ⟨xs, xu⟩),
exact is_open.mem_nhds u_open xu
end
/-- A function is `C^(n + 1)` on a domain iff locally, it has a derivative which is `C^n`. -/
theorem cont_diff_on_succ_iff_has_fderiv_within_at {n : ℕ} :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 ((n + 1) : ℕ) f s
↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ u ∈ 𝓝[insert x s] x, ∃ f' : E → (E →L[𝕜] F),
(∀ x ∈ u, has_fderiv_within_at f (f' x) u x) ∧ (cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f' u) :=
begin
split,
{ assume h x hx,
rcases (h x hx) n.succ le_rfl with ⟨u, hu, p, Hp⟩,
refine ⟨u, hu, λ y, (continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1 𝕜 E F) (p y 1),
λ y hy, Hp.has_fderiv_within_at (with_top.coe_le_coe.2 (nat.le_add_left 1 n)) hy, _⟩,
rw has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on_succ_iff_right at Hp,
assume z hz m hm,
refine ⟨u, _, λ (x : E), (p x).shift, Hp.2.2.of_le hm⟩,
convert self_mem_nhds_within,
exact insert_eq_of_mem hz, },
{ assume h x hx,
rw cont_diff_within_at_succ_iff_has_fderiv_within_at,
rcases h x hx with ⟨u, u_nhbd, f', hu, hf'⟩,
have : x ∈ u := mem_of_mem_nhds_within (mem_insert _ _) u_nhbd,
exact ⟨u, u_nhbd, f', hu, hf' x this⟩ }
end
/-! ### Iterated derivative within a set -/
variable (𝕜)
/--
The `n`-th derivative of a function along a set, defined inductively by saying that the `n+1`-th
derivative of `f` is the derivative of the `n`-th derivative of `f` along this set, together with
an uncurrying step to see it as a multilinear map in `n+1` variables..
-/
noncomputable def iterated_fderiv_within (n : ℕ) (f : E → F) (s : set E) :
E → (E [×n]→L[𝕜] F) :=
nat.rec_on n
(λ x, continuous_multilinear_map.curry0 𝕜 E (f x))
(λ n rec x, continuous_linear_map.uncurry_left (fderiv_within 𝕜 rec s x))
/-- Formal Taylor series associated to a function within a set. -/
def ftaylor_series_within (f : E → F) (s : set E) (x : E) : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F :=
λ n, iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 n f s x
variable {𝕜}
@[simp] lemma iterated_fderiv_within_zero_apply (m : (fin 0) → E) :
(iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 0 f s x : ((fin 0) → E) → F) m = f x := rfl
lemma iterated_fderiv_within_zero_eq_comp :
iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 0 f s = (continuous_multilinear_curry_fin0 𝕜 E F).symm ∘ f := rfl
lemma iterated_fderiv_within_succ_apply_left {n : ℕ} (m : fin (n + 1) → E):
(iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 (n + 1) f s x : (fin (n + 1) → E) → F) m
= (fderiv_within 𝕜 (iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 n f s) s x : E → (E [×n]→L[𝕜] F))
(m 0) (tail m) := rfl
/-- Writing explicitly the `n+1`-th derivative as the composition of a currying linear equiv,
and the derivative of the `n`-th derivative. -/
lemma iterated_fderiv_within_succ_eq_comp_left {n : ℕ} :
iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 (n + 1) f s =
(continuous_multilinear_curry_left_equiv 𝕜 (λ(i : fin (n + 1)), E) F)
∘ (fderiv_within 𝕜 (iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 n f s) s) := rfl
theorem iterated_fderiv_within_succ_apply_right {n : ℕ}
(hs : unique_diff_on 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) (m : fin (n + 1) → E) :
(iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 (n + 1) f s x : (fin (n + 1) → E) → F) m
= iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 n (λy, fderiv_within 𝕜 f s y) s x (init m) (m (last n)) :=
begin
induction n with n IH generalizing x,
{ rw [iterated_fderiv_within_succ_eq_comp_left, iterated_fderiv_within_zero_eq_comp,
iterated_fderiv_within_zero_apply,
function.comp_apply, linear_isometry_equiv.comp_fderiv_within _ (hs x hx)],
refl },
{ let I := continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv' 𝕜 n E F,
have A : ∀ y ∈ s, iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 n.succ f s y
= (I ∘ (iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 n (λy, fderiv_within 𝕜 f s y) s)) y,
by { assume y hy, ext m, rw @IH m y hy, refl },
calc
(iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 (n+2) f s x : (fin (n+2) → E) → F) m =
(fderiv_within 𝕜 (iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 n.succ f s) s x
: E → (E [×(n + 1)]→L[𝕜] F)) (m 0) (tail m) : rfl
... = (fderiv_within 𝕜 (I ∘ (iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 n (fderiv_within 𝕜 f s) s)) s x
: E → (E [×(n + 1)]→L[𝕜] F)) (m 0) (tail m) :
by rw fderiv_within_congr (hs x hx) A (A x hx)
... = (I ∘ fderiv_within 𝕜 ((iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 n (fderiv_within 𝕜 f s) s)) s x
: E → (E [×(n + 1)]→L[𝕜] F)) (m 0) (tail m) :
by { rw linear_isometry_equiv.comp_fderiv_within _ (hs x hx), refl }
... = (fderiv_within 𝕜 ((iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 n (λ y, fderiv_within 𝕜 f s y) s)) s x
: E → (E [×n]→L[𝕜] (E →L[𝕜] F))) (m 0) (init (tail m)) ((tail m) (last n)) : rfl
... = iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 (nat.succ n) (λ y, fderiv_within 𝕜 f s y) s x
(init m) (m (last (n + 1))) :
by { rw [iterated_fderiv_within_succ_apply_left, tail_init_eq_init_tail], refl } }
end
/-- Writing explicitly the `n+1`-th derivative as the composition of a currying linear equiv,
and the `n`-th derivative of the derivative. -/
lemma iterated_fderiv_within_succ_eq_comp_right {n : ℕ} (hs : unique_diff_on 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 (n + 1) f s x =
((continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv' 𝕜 n E F)
∘ (iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 n (λy, fderiv_within 𝕜 f s y) s)) x :=
by { ext m, rw iterated_fderiv_within_succ_apply_right hs hx, refl }
@[simp] lemma iterated_fderiv_within_one_apply
(hs : unique_diff_on 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) (m : (fin 1) → E) :
(iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 1 f s x : ((fin 1) → E) → F) m
= (fderiv_within 𝕜 f s x : E → F) (m 0) :=
by { rw [iterated_fderiv_within_succ_apply_right hs hx, iterated_fderiv_within_zero_apply], refl }
/-- If two functions coincide on a set `s` of unique differentiability, then their iterated
differentials within this set coincide. -/
lemma iterated_fderiv_within_congr {n : ℕ}
(hs : unique_diff_on 𝕜 s) (hL : ∀y∈s, f₁ y = f y) (hx : x ∈ s) :
iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 n f₁ s x = iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 n f s x :=
begin
induction n with n IH generalizing x,
{ ext m, simp [hL x hx] },
{ have : fderiv_within 𝕜 (λ y, iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 n f₁ s y) s x
= fderiv_within 𝕜 (λ y, iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 n f s y) s x :=
fderiv_within_congr (hs x hx) (λ y hy, IH hy) (IH hx),
ext m,
rw [iterated_fderiv_within_succ_apply_left, iterated_fderiv_within_succ_apply_left, this] }
end
/-- The iterated differential within a set `s` at a point `x` is not modified if one intersects
`s` with an open set containing `x`. -/
lemma iterated_fderiv_within_inter_open {n : ℕ} (hu : is_open u)
(hs : unique_diff_on 𝕜 (s ∩ u)) (hx : x ∈ s ∩ u) :
iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 n f (s ∩ u) x = iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 n f s x :=
begin
induction n with n IH generalizing x,
{ ext m, simp },
{ have A : fderiv_within 𝕜 (λ y, iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 n f (s ∩ u) y) (s ∩ u) x
= fderiv_within 𝕜 (λ y, iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 n f s y) (s ∩ u) x :=
fderiv_within_congr (hs x hx) (λ y hy, IH hy) (IH hx),
have B : fderiv_within 𝕜 (λ y, iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 n f s y) (s ∩ u) x
= fderiv_within 𝕜 (λ y, iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 n f s y) s x :=
fderiv_within_inter (is_open.mem_nhds hu hx.2)
((unique_diff_within_at_inter (is_open.mem_nhds hu hx.2)).1 (hs x hx)),
ext m,
rw [iterated_fderiv_within_succ_apply_left, iterated_fderiv_within_succ_apply_left, A, B] }
end
/-- The iterated differential within a set `s` at a point `x` is not modified if one intersects
`s` with a neighborhood of `x` within `s`. -/
lemma iterated_fderiv_within_inter' {n : ℕ}
(hu : u ∈ 𝓝[s] x) (hs : unique_diff_on 𝕜 s) (xs : x ∈ s) :
iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 n f (s ∩ u) x = iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 n f s x :=
begin
obtain ⟨v, v_open, xv, vu⟩ : ∃ v, is_open v ∧ x ∈ v ∧ v ∩ s ⊆ u := mem_nhds_within.1 hu,
have A : (s ∩ u) ∩ v = s ∩ v,
{ apply subset.antisymm (inter_subset_inter (inter_subset_left _ _) (subset.refl _)),
exact λ y ⟨ys, yv⟩, ⟨⟨ys, vu ⟨yv, ys⟩⟩, yv⟩ },
have : iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 n f (s ∩ v) x = iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 n f s x :=
iterated_fderiv_within_inter_open v_open (hs.inter v_open) ⟨xs, xv⟩,
rw ← this,
have : iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 n f ((s ∩ u) ∩ v) x = iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 n f (s ∩ u) x,
{ refine iterated_fderiv_within_inter_open v_open _ ⟨⟨xs, vu ⟨xv, xs⟩⟩, xv⟩,
rw A,
exact hs.inter v_open },
rw A at this,
rw ← this
end
/-- The iterated differential within a set `s` at a point `x` is not modified if one intersects
`s` with a neighborhood of `x`. -/
lemma iterated_fderiv_within_inter {n : ℕ}
(hu : u ∈ 𝓝 x) (hs : unique_diff_on 𝕜 s) (xs : x ∈ s) :
iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 n f (s ∩ u) x = iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 n f s x :=
iterated_fderiv_within_inter' (mem_nhds_within_of_mem_nhds hu) hs xs
@[simp] lemma cont_diff_on_zero :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 0 f s ↔ continuous_on f s :=
begin
refine ⟨λ H, H.continuous_on, λ H, _⟩,
assume x hx m hm,
have : (m : with_top ℕ) = 0 := le_antisymm hm bot_le,
rw this,
refine ⟨insert x s, self_mem_nhds_within, ftaylor_series_within 𝕜 f s, _⟩,
rw has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on_zero_iff,
exact ⟨by rwa insert_eq_of_mem hx, λ x hx, by simp [ftaylor_series_within]⟩
end
lemma cont_diff_within_at_zero (hx : x ∈ s) :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 0 f s x ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝[s] x, continuous_on f (s ∩ u) :=
begin
split,
{ intros h,
obtain ⟨u, H, p, hp⟩ := h 0 (by norm_num),
refine ⟨u, _, _⟩,
{ simpa [hx] using H },
{ simp only [with_top.coe_zero, has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on_zero_iff] at hp,
exact hp.1.mono (inter_subset_right s u) } },
{ rintros ⟨u, H, hu⟩,
rw ← cont_diff_within_at_inter' H,
have h' : x ∈ s ∩ u := ⟨hx, mem_of_mem_nhds_within hx H⟩,
exact (cont_diff_on_zero.mpr hu).cont_diff_within_at h' }
end
/-- On a set with unique differentiability, any choice of iterated differential has to coincide
with the one we have chosen in `iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 m f s`. -/
theorem has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on.eq_ftaylor_series_of_unique_diff_on
(h : has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on n f p s)
{m : ℕ} (hmn : (m : with_top ℕ) ≤ n) (hs : unique_diff_on 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
p x m = iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 m f s x :=
begin
induction m with m IH generalizing x,
{ rw [h.zero_eq' hx, iterated_fderiv_within_zero_eq_comp] },
{ have A : (m : with_top ℕ) < n := lt_of_lt_of_le (with_top.coe_lt_coe.2 (lt_add_one m)) hmn,
have : has_fderiv_within_at (λ (y : E), iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 m f s y)
(continuous_multilinear_map.curry_left (p x (nat.succ m))) s x :=
(h.fderiv_within m A x hx).congr (λ y hy, (IH (le_of_lt A) hy).symm) (IH (le_of_lt A) hx).symm,
rw [iterated_fderiv_within_succ_eq_comp_left, function.comp_apply,
this.fderiv_within (hs x hx)],
exact (continuous_multilinear_map.uncurry_curry_left _).symm }
end
/-- When a function is `C^n` in a set `s` of unique differentiability, it admits
`ftaylor_series_within 𝕜 f s` as a Taylor series up to order `n` in `s`. -/
theorem cont_diff_on.ftaylor_series_within
(h : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s) (hs : unique_diff_on 𝕜 s) :
has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on n f (ftaylor_series_within 𝕜 f s) s :=
begin
split,
{ assume x hx,
simp only [ftaylor_series_within, continuous_multilinear_map.uncurry0_apply,
iterated_fderiv_within_zero_apply] },
{ assume m hm x hx,
rcases (h x hx) m.succ (with_top.add_one_le_of_lt hm) with ⟨u, hu, p, Hp⟩,
rw insert_eq_of_mem hx at hu,
rcases mem_nhds_within.1 hu with ⟨o, o_open, xo, ho⟩,
rw inter_comm at ho,
have : p x m.succ = ftaylor_series_within 𝕜 f s x m.succ,
{ change p x m.succ = iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 m.succ f s x,
rw ← iterated_fderiv_within_inter (is_open.mem_nhds o_open xo) hs hx,
exact (Hp.mono ho).eq_ftaylor_series_of_unique_diff_on le_rfl
(hs.inter o_open) ⟨hx, xo⟩ },
rw [← this, ← has_fderiv_within_at_inter (is_open.mem_nhds o_open xo)],
have A : ∀ y ∈ s ∩ o, p y m = ftaylor_series_within 𝕜 f s y m,
{ rintros y ⟨hy, yo⟩,
change p y m = iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 m f s y,
rw ← iterated_fderiv_within_inter (is_open.mem_nhds o_open yo) hs hy,
exact (Hp.mono ho).eq_ftaylor_series_of_unique_diff_on (with_top.coe_le_coe.2 (nat.le_succ m))
(hs.inter o_open) ⟨hy, yo⟩ },
exact ((Hp.mono ho).fderiv_within m (with_top.coe_lt_coe.2 (lt_add_one m)) x ⟨hx, xo⟩).congr
(λ y hy, (A y hy).symm) (A x ⟨hx, xo⟩).symm },
{ assume m hm,
apply continuous_on_of_locally_continuous_on,
assume x hx,
rcases h x hx m hm with ⟨u, hu, p, Hp⟩,
rcases mem_nhds_within.1 hu with ⟨o, o_open, xo, ho⟩,
rw insert_eq_of_mem hx at ho,
rw inter_comm at ho,
refine ⟨o, o_open, xo, _⟩,
have A : ∀ y ∈ s ∩ o, p y m = ftaylor_series_within 𝕜 f s y m,
{ rintros y ⟨hy, yo⟩,
change p y m = iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 m f s y,
rw ← iterated_fderiv_within_inter (is_open.mem_nhds o_open yo) hs hy,
exact (Hp.mono ho).eq_ftaylor_series_of_unique_diff_on le_rfl
(hs.inter o_open) ⟨hy, yo⟩ },
exact ((Hp.mono ho).cont m le_rfl).congr (λ y hy, (A y hy).symm) }
end
lemma cont_diff_on_of_continuous_on_differentiable_on
(Hcont : ∀ (m : ℕ), (m : with_top ℕ) ≤ n →
continuous_on (λ x, iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 m f s x) s)
(Hdiff : ∀ (m : ℕ), (m : with_top ℕ) < n →
differentiable_on 𝕜 (λ x, iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 m f s x) s) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s :=
begin
assume x hx m hm,
rw insert_eq_of_mem hx,
refine ⟨s, self_mem_nhds_within, ftaylor_series_within 𝕜 f s, _⟩,
split,
{ assume y hy,
simp only [ftaylor_series_within, continuous_multilinear_map.uncurry0_apply,
iterated_fderiv_within_zero_apply] },
{ assume k hk y hy,
convert (Hdiff k (lt_of_lt_of_le hk hm) y hy).has_fderiv_within_at,
simp only [ftaylor_series_within, iterated_fderiv_within_succ_eq_comp_left,
continuous_linear_equiv.coe_apply, function.comp_app, coe_fn_coe_base],
exact continuous_linear_map.curry_uncurry_left _ },
{ assume k hk,
exact Hcont k (le_trans hk hm) }
end
lemma cont_diff_on_of_differentiable_on
(h : ∀(m : ℕ), (m : with_top ℕ) ≤ n → differentiable_on 𝕜 (iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 m f s) s) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s :=
cont_diff_on_of_continuous_on_differentiable_on
(λ m hm, (h m hm).continuous_on) (λ m hm, (h m (le_of_lt hm)))
lemma cont_diff_on.continuous_on_iterated_fderiv_within {m : ℕ}
(h : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s) (hmn : (m : with_top ℕ) ≤ n) (hs : unique_diff_on 𝕜 s) :
continuous_on (iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 m f s) s :=
(h.ftaylor_series_within hs).cont m hmn
lemma cont_diff_on.differentiable_on_iterated_fderiv_within {m : ℕ}
(h : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s) (hmn : (m : with_top ℕ) < n) (hs : unique_diff_on 𝕜 s) :
differentiable_on 𝕜 (iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 m f s) s :=
λ x hx, ((h.ftaylor_series_within hs).fderiv_within m hmn x hx).differentiable_within_at
lemma cont_diff_on_iff_continuous_on_differentiable_on
(hs : unique_diff_on 𝕜 s) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s ↔
(∀ (m : ℕ), (m : with_top ℕ) ≤ n →
continuous_on (λ x, iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 m f s x) s)
∧ (∀ (m : ℕ), (m : with_top ℕ) < n →
differentiable_on 𝕜 (λ x, iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 m f s x) s) :=
begin
split,
{ assume h,
split,
{ assume m hm, exact h.continuous_on_iterated_fderiv_within hm hs },
{ assume m hm, exact h.differentiable_on_iterated_fderiv_within hm hs } },
{ assume h,
exact cont_diff_on_of_continuous_on_differentiable_on h.1 h.2 }
end
lemma cont_diff_on_succ_of_fderiv_within {n : ℕ} (hf : differentiable_on 𝕜 f s)
(h : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (λ y, fderiv_within 𝕜 f s y) s) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 ((n + 1) : ℕ) f s :=
begin
intros x hx,
rw [cont_diff_within_at_succ_iff_has_fderiv_within_at, insert_eq_of_mem hx],
exact ⟨s, self_mem_nhds_within, fderiv_within 𝕜 f s,
λ y hy, (hf y hy).has_fderiv_within_at, h x hx⟩
end
/-- A function is `C^(n + 1)` on a domain with unique derivatives if and only if it is
differentiable there, and its derivative (expressed with `fderiv_within`) is `C^n`. -/
theorem cont_diff_on_succ_iff_fderiv_within {n : ℕ} (hs : unique_diff_on 𝕜 s) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 ((n + 1) : ℕ) f s ↔
differentiable_on 𝕜 f s ∧ cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (λ y, fderiv_within 𝕜 f s y) s :=
begin
refine ⟨λ H, _, λ h, cont_diff_on_succ_of_fderiv_within h.1 h.2⟩,
refine ⟨H.differentiable_on (with_top.coe_le_coe.2 (nat.le_add_left 1 n)), λ x hx, _⟩,
rcases cont_diff_within_at_succ_iff_has_fderiv_within_at.1 (H x hx)
with ⟨u, hu, f', hff', hf'⟩,
rcases mem_nhds_within.1 hu with ⟨o, o_open, xo, ho⟩,
rw [inter_comm, insert_eq_of_mem hx] at ho,
have := hf'.mono ho,
rw cont_diff_within_at_inter' (mem_nhds_within_of_mem_nhds (is_open.mem_nhds o_open xo))
at this,
apply this.congr_of_eventually_eq' _ hx,
have : o ∩ s ∈ 𝓝[s] x := mem_nhds_within.2 ⟨o, o_open, xo, subset.refl _⟩,
rw inter_comm at this,
apply filter.eventually_eq_of_mem this (λ y hy, _),
have A : fderiv_within 𝕜 f (s ∩ o) y = f' y :=
((hff' y (ho hy)).mono ho).fderiv_within (hs.inter o_open y hy),
rwa fderiv_within_inter (is_open.mem_nhds o_open hy.2) (hs y hy.1) at A
end
/-- A function is `C^(n + 1)` on an open domain if and only if it is
differentiable there, and its derivative (expressed with `fderiv`) is `C^n`. -/
theorem cont_diff_on_succ_iff_fderiv_of_open {n : ℕ} (hs : is_open s) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 ((n + 1) : ℕ) f s ↔
differentiable_on 𝕜 f s ∧ cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (λ y, fderiv 𝕜 f y) s :=
begin
rw cont_diff_on_succ_iff_fderiv_within hs.unique_diff_on,
congr' 2,
rw ← iff_iff_eq,
apply cont_diff_on_congr,
assume x hx,
exact fderiv_within_of_open hs hx
end
/-- A function is `C^∞` on a domain with unique derivatives if and only if it is differentiable
there, and its derivative (expressed with `fderiv_within`) is `C^∞`. -/
theorem cont_diff_on_top_iff_fderiv_within (hs : unique_diff_on 𝕜 s) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 ∞ f s ↔
differentiable_on 𝕜 f s ∧ cont_diff_on 𝕜 ∞ (λ y, fderiv_within 𝕜 f s y) s :=
begin
split,
{ assume h,
refine ⟨h.differentiable_on le_top, _⟩,
apply cont_diff_on_top.2 (λ n, ((cont_diff_on_succ_iff_fderiv_within hs).1 _).2),
exact h.of_le le_top },
{ assume h,
refine cont_diff_on_top.2 (λ n, _),
have A : (n : with_top ℕ) ≤ ∞ := le_top,
apply ((cont_diff_on_succ_iff_fderiv_within hs).2 ⟨h.1, h.2.of_le A⟩).of_le,
exact with_top.coe_le_coe.2 (nat.le_succ n) }
end
/-- A function is `C^∞` on an open domain if and only if it is differentiable there, and its
derivative (expressed with `fderiv`) is `C^∞`. -/
theorem cont_diff_on_top_iff_fderiv_of_open (hs : is_open s) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 ∞ f s ↔
differentiable_on 𝕜 f s ∧ cont_diff_on 𝕜 ∞ (λ y, fderiv 𝕜 f y) s :=
begin
rw cont_diff_on_top_iff_fderiv_within hs.unique_diff_on,
congr' 2,
rw ← iff_iff_eq,
apply cont_diff_on_congr,
assume x hx,
exact fderiv_within_of_open hs hx
end
lemma cont_diff_on.fderiv_within
(hf : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s) (hs : unique_diff_on 𝕜 s) (hmn : m + 1 ≤ n) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 m (λ y, fderiv_within 𝕜 f s y) s :=
begin
cases m,
{ change ∞ + 1 ≤ n at hmn,
have : n = ∞, by simpa using hmn,
rw this at hf,
exact ((cont_diff_on_top_iff_fderiv_within hs).1 hf).2 },
{ change (m.succ : with_top ℕ) ≤ n at hmn,
exact ((cont_diff_on_succ_iff_fderiv_within hs).1 (hf.of_le hmn)).2 }
end
lemma cont_diff_on.fderiv_of_open
(hf : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s) (hs : is_open s) (hmn : m + 1 ≤ n) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 m (λ y, fderiv 𝕜 f y) s :=
(hf.fderiv_within hs.unique_diff_on hmn).congr (λ x hx, (fderiv_within_of_open hs hx).symm)
lemma cont_diff_on.continuous_on_fderiv_within
(h : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s) (hs : unique_diff_on 𝕜 s) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
continuous_on (λ x, fderiv_within 𝕜 f s x) s :=
((cont_diff_on_succ_iff_fderiv_within hs).1 (h.of_le hn)).2.continuous_on
lemma cont_diff_on.continuous_on_fderiv_of_open
(h : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s) (hs : is_open s) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
continuous_on (λ x, fderiv 𝕜 f x) s :=
((cont_diff_on_succ_iff_fderiv_of_open hs).1 (h.of_le hn)).2.continuous_on
/-- If a function is at least `C^1`, its bundled derivative (mapping `(x, v)` to `Df(x) v`) is
continuous. -/
lemma cont_diff_on.continuous_on_fderiv_within_apply
(h : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s) (hs : unique_diff_on 𝕜 s) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
continuous_on (λp : E × E, (fderiv_within 𝕜 f s p.1 : E → F) p.2) (s ×ˢ (univ : set E)) :=
begin
have A : continuous (λq : (E →L[𝕜] F) × E, q.1 q.2) := is_bounded_bilinear_map_apply.continuous,
have B : continuous_on (λp : E × E, (fderiv_within 𝕜 f s p.1, p.2)) (s ×ˢ (univ : set E)),
{ apply continuous_on.prod _ continuous_snd.continuous_on,
exact continuous_on.comp (h.continuous_on_fderiv_within hs hn) continuous_fst.continuous_on
(prod_subset_preimage_fst _ _) },
exact A.comp_continuous_on B
end
/-! ### Functions with a Taylor series on the whole space -/
/-- `has_ftaylor_series_up_to n f p` registers the fact that `p 0 = f` and `p (m+1)` is a
derivative of `p m` for `m < n`, and is continuous for `m ≤ n`. This is a predicate analogous to
`has_fderiv_at` but for higher order derivatives. -/
structure has_ftaylor_series_up_to (n : with_top ℕ)
(f : E → F) (p : E → formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F) : Prop :=
(zero_eq : ∀ x, (p x 0).uncurry0 = f x)
(fderiv : ∀ (m : ℕ) (hm : (m : with_top ℕ) < n), ∀ x,
has_fderiv_at (λ y, p y m) (p x m.succ).curry_left x)
(cont : ∀ (m : ℕ) (hm : (m : with_top ℕ) ≤ n), continuous (λ x, p x m))
lemma has_ftaylor_series_up_to.zero_eq'
(h : has_ftaylor_series_up_to n f p) (x : E) :
p x 0 = (continuous_multilinear_curry_fin0 𝕜 E F).symm (f x) :=
by { rw ← h.zero_eq x, symmetry, exact continuous_multilinear_map.uncurry0_curry0 _ }
lemma has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on_univ_iff :
has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on n f p univ ↔ has_ftaylor_series_up_to n f p :=
begin
split,
{ assume H,
split,
{ exact λ x, H.zero_eq x (mem_univ x) },
{ assume m hm x,
rw ← has_fderiv_within_at_univ,
exact H.fderiv_within m hm x (mem_univ x) },
{ assume m hm,
rw continuous_iff_continuous_on_univ,
exact H.cont m hm } },
{ assume H,
split,
{ exact λ x hx, H.zero_eq x },
{ assume m hm x hx,
rw has_fderiv_within_at_univ,
exact H.fderiv m hm x },
{ assume m hm,
rw ← continuous_iff_continuous_on_univ,
exact H.cont m hm } }
end
lemma has_ftaylor_series_up_to.has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on
(h : has_ftaylor_series_up_to n f p) (s : set E) :
has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on n f p s :=
(has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on_univ_iff.2 h).mono (subset_univ _)
lemma has_ftaylor_series_up_to.of_le
(h : has_ftaylor_series_up_to n f p) (hmn : m ≤ n) :
has_ftaylor_series_up_to m f p :=
by { rw ← has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on_univ_iff at h ⊢, exact h.of_le hmn }
lemma has_ftaylor_series_up_to.continuous
(h : has_ftaylor_series_up_to n f p) : continuous f :=
begin
rw ← has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on_univ_iff at h,
rw continuous_iff_continuous_on_univ,
exact h.continuous_on
end
lemma has_ftaylor_series_up_to_zero_iff :
has_ftaylor_series_up_to 0 f p ↔ continuous f ∧ (∀ x, (p x 0).uncurry0 = f x) :=
by simp [has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on_univ_iff.symm, continuous_iff_continuous_on_univ,
has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on_zero_iff]
/-- If a function has a Taylor series at order at least `1`, then the term of order `1` of this
series is a derivative of `f`. -/
lemma has_ftaylor_series_up_to.has_fderiv_at
(h : has_ftaylor_series_up_to n f p) (hn : 1 ≤ n) (x : E) :
has_fderiv_at f (continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1 𝕜 E F (p x 1)) x :=
begin
rw [← has_fderiv_within_at_univ],
exact (has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on_univ_iff.2 h).has_fderiv_within_at hn (mem_univ _)
end
lemma has_ftaylor_series_up_to.differentiable
(h : has_ftaylor_series_up_to n f p) (hn : 1 ≤ n) : differentiable 𝕜 f :=
λ x, (h.has_fderiv_at hn x).differentiable_at
/-- `p` is a Taylor series of `f` up to `n+1` if and only if `p.shift` is a Taylor series up to `n`
for `p 1`, which is a derivative of `f`. -/
theorem has_ftaylor_series_up_to_succ_iff_right {n : ℕ} :
has_ftaylor_series_up_to ((n + 1) : ℕ) f p ↔
(∀ x, (p x 0).uncurry0 = f x)
∧ (∀ x, has_fderiv_at (λ y, p y 0) (p x 1).curry_left x)
∧ has_ftaylor_series_up_to n
(λ x, continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1 𝕜 E F (p x 1)) (λ x, (p x).shift) :=
by simp [has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on_succ_iff_right, has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on_univ_iff.symm,
-add_comm, -with_zero.coe_add]
/-! ### Smooth functions at a point -/
variable (𝕜)
/-- A function is continuously differentiable up to `n` at a point `x` if, for any integer `k ≤ n`,
there is a neighborhood of `x` where `f` admits derivatives up to order `n`, which are continuous.
-/
def cont_diff_at (n : with_top ℕ) (f : E → F) (x : E) :=
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f univ x
variable {𝕜}
theorem cont_diff_within_at_univ :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f univ x ↔ cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f x :=
iff.rfl
lemma cont_diff_at_top :
cont_diff_at 𝕜 ∞ f x ↔ ∀ (n : ℕ), cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f x :=
by simp [← cont_diff_within_at_univ, cont_diff_within_at_top]
lemma cont_diff_at.cont_diff_within_at
(h : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f x) : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x :=
h.mono (subset_univ _)
lemma cont_diff_within_at.cont_diff_at
(h : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x) (hx : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f x :=
by rwa [cont_diff_at, ← cont_diff_within_at_inter hx, univ_inter]
lemma cont_diff_at.congr_of_eventually_eq
(h : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f x) (hg : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f) :
cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f₁ x :=
h.congr_of_eventually_eq' (by rwa nhds_within_univ) (mem_univ x)
lemma cont_diff_at.of_le
(h : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f x) (hmn : m ≤ n) :
cont_diff_at 𝕜 m f x :=
h.of_le hmn
lemma cont_diff_at.continuous_at
(h : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f x) : continuous_at f x :=
by simpa [continuous_within_at_univ] using h.continuous_within_at
/-- If a function is `C^n` with `n ≥ 1` at a point, then it is differentiable there. -/
lemma cont_diff_at.differentiable_at
(h : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f x) (hn : 1 ≤ n) : differentiable_at 𝕜 f x :=
by simpa [hn, differentiable_within_at_univ] using h.differentiable_within_at
/-- A function is `C^(n + 1)` at a point iff locally, it has a derivative which is `C^n`. -/
theorem cont_diff_at_succ_iff_has_fderiv_at {n : ℕ} :
cont_diff_at 𝕜 ((n + 1) : ℕ) f x
↔ (∃ f' : E → E →L[𝕜] F, (∃ u ∈ 𝓝 x, ∀ x ∈ u, has_fderiv_at f (f' x) x)
∧ cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f' x) :=
begin
rw [← cont_diff_within_at_univ, cont_diff_within_at_succ_iff_has_fderiv_within_at],
simp only [nhds_within_univ, exists_prop, mem_univ, insert_eq_of_mem],
split,
{ rintros ⟨u, H, f', h_fderiv, h_cont_diff⟩,
rcases mem_nhds_iff.mp H with ⟨t, htu, ht, hxt⟩,
refine ⟨f', ⟨t, _⟩, h_cont_diff.cont_diff_at H⟩,
refine ⟨mem_nhds_iff.mpr ⟨t, subset.rfl, ht, hxt⟩, _⟩,
intros y hyt,
refine (h_fderiv y (htu hyt)).has_fderiv_at _,
exact mem_nhds_iff.mpr ⟨t, htu, ht, hyt⟩ },
{ rintros ⟨f', ⟨u, H, h_fderiv⟩, h_cont_diff⟩,
refine ⟨u, H, f', _, h_cont_diff.cont_diff_within_at⟩,
intros x hxu,
exact (h_fderiv x hxu).has_fderiv_within_at }
end
protected theorem cont_diff_at.eventually {n : ℕ} (h : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f x) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f y :=
by simpa [nhds_within_univ] using h.eventually
/-! ### Smooth functions -/
variable (𝕜)
/-- A function is continuously differentiable up to `n` if it admits derivatives up to
order `n`, which are continuous. Contrary to the case of definitions in domains (where derivatives
might not be unique) we do not need to localize the definition in space or time.
-/
definition cont_diff (n : with_top ℕ) (f : E → F) :=
∃ p : E → formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F, has_ftaylor_series_up_to n f p
variable {𝕜}
theorem cont_diff_on_univ : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f univ ↔ cont_diff 𝕜 n f :=
begin
split,
{ assume H,
use ftaylor_series_within 𝕜 f univ,
rw ← has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on_univ_iff,
exact H.ftaylor_series_within unique_diff_on_univ },
{ rintros ⟨p, hp⟩ x hx m hm,
exact ⟨univ, filter.univ_sets _, p, (hp.has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on univ).of_le hm⟩ }
end
lemma cont_diff_iff_cont_diff_at : cont_diff 𝕜 n f ↔ ∀ x, cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f x :=
by simp [← cont_diff_on_univ, cont_diff_on, cont_diff_at]
lemma cont_diff.cont_diff_at (h : cont_diff 𝕜 n f) : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f x :=
cont_diff_iff_cont_diff_at.1 h x
lemma cont_diff.cont_diff_within_at (h : cont_diff 𝕜 n f) : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x :=
h.cont_diff_at.cont_diff_within_at
lemma cont_diff_top : cont_diff 𝕜 ∞ f ↔ ∀ (n : ℕ), cont_diff 𝕜 n f :=
by simp [cont_diff_on_univ.symm, cont_diff_on_top]
lemma cont_diff_all_iff_nat : (∀ n, cont_diff 𝕜 n f) ↔ (∀ n : ℕ, cont_diff 𝕜 n f) :=
by simp only [← cont_diff_on_univ, cont_diff_on_all_iff_nat]
lemma cont_diff.cont_diff_on (h : cont_diff 𝕜 n f) : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s :=
(cont_diff_on_univ.2 h).mono (subset_univ _)
@[simp] lemma cont_diff_zero : cont_diff 𝕜 0 f ↔ continuous f :=
begin
rw [← cont_diff_on_univ, continuous_iff_continuous_on_univ],
exact cont_diff_on_zero
end
lemma cont_diff_at_zero : cont_diff_at 𝕜 0 f x ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 x, continuous_on f u :=
by { rw ← cont_diff_within_at_univ, simp [cont_diff_within_at_zero, nhds_within_univ] }
theorem cont_diff_at_one_iff : cont_diff_at 𝕜 1 f x ↔
∃ f' : E → (E →L[𝕜] F), ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 x, continuous_on f' u ∧ ∀ x ∈ u, has_fderiv_at f (f' x) x :=
by simp_rw [show (1 : with_top ℕ) = (0 + 1 : ℕ), from (zero_add 1).symm,
cont_diff_at_succ_iff_has_fderiv_at, show ((0 : ℕ) : with_top ℕ) = 0, from rfl,
cont_diff_at_zero, exists_mem_and_iff antitone_bforall antitone_continuous_on, and_comm]
lemma cont_diff.of_le (h : cont_diff 𝕜 n f) (hmn : m ≤ n) : cont_diff 𝕜 m f :=
cont_diff_on_univ.1 $ (cont_diff_on_univ.2 h).of_le hmn
lemma cont_diff.of_succ {n : ℕ} (h : cont_diff 𝕜 (n + 1) f) : cont_diff 𝕜 n f :=
h.of_le $ with_top.coe_le_coe.mpr le_self_add
lemma cont_diff.one_of_succ {n : ℕ} (h : cont_diff 𝕜 (n + 1) f) : cont_diff 𝕜 1 f :=
h.of_le $ with_top.coe_le_coe.mpr le_add_self
lemma cont_diff.continuous (h : cont_diff 𝕜 n f) : continuous f :=
cont_diff_zero.1 (h.of_le bot_le)
/-- If a function is `C^n` with `n ≥ 1`, then it is differentiable. -/
lemma cont_diff.differentiable (h : cont_diff 𝕜 n f) (hn : 1 ≤ n) : differentiable 𝕜 f :=
differentiable_on_univ.1 $ (cont_diff_on_univ.2 h).differentiable_on hn
/-! ### Iterated derivative -/
variable (𝕜)
/-- The `n`-th derivative of a function, as a multilinear map, defined inductively. -/
noncomputable def iterated_fderiv (n : ℕ) (f : E → F) :
E → (E [×n]→L[𝕜] F) :=
nat.rec_on n
(λ x, continuous_multilinear_map.curry0 𝕜 E (f x))
(λ n rec x, continuous_linear_map.uncurry_left (fderiv 𝕜 rec x))
/-- Formal Taylor series associated to a function within a set. -/
def ftaylor_series (f : E → F) (x : E) : formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E F :=
λ n, iterated_fderiv 𝕜 n f x
variable {𝕜}
@[simp] lemma iterated_fderiv_zero_apply (m : (fin 0) → E) :
(iterated_fderiv 𝕜 0 f x : ((fin 0) → E) → F) m = f x := rfl
lemma iterated_fderiv_zero_eq_comp :
iterated_fderiv 𝕜 0 f = (continuous_multilinear_curry_fin0 𝕜 E F).symm ∘ f := rfl
lemma iterated_fderiv_succ_apply_left {n : ℕ} (m : fin (n + 1) → E):
(iterated_fderiv 𝕜 (n + 1) f x : (fin (n + 1) → E) → F) m
= (fderiv 𝕜 (iterated_fderiv 𝕜 n f) x : E → (E [×n]→L[𝕜] F)) (m 0) (tail m) := rfl
/-- Writing explicitly the `n+1`-th derivative as the composition of a currying linear equiv,
and the derivative of the `n`-th derivative. -/
lemma iterated_fderiv_succ_eq_comp_left {n : ℕ} :
iterated_fderiv 𝕜 (n + 1) f =
(continuous_multilinear_curry_left_equiv 𝕜 (λ(i : fin (n + 1)), E) F)
∘ (fderiv 𝕜 (iterated_fderiv 𝕜 n f)) := rfl
lemma iterated_fderiv_within_univ {n : ℕ} :
iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 n f univ = iterated_fderiv 𝕜 n f :=
begin
induction n with n IH,
{ ext x, simp },
{ ext x m,
rw [iterated_fderiv_succ_apply_left, iterated_fderiv_within_succ_apply_left, IH,
fderiv_within_univ] }
end
/-- In an open set, the iterated derivative within this set coincides with the global iterated
derivative. -/
lemma iterated_fderiv_within_of_is_open (n : ℕ) (hs : is_open s) :
eq_on (iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 n f s) (iterated_fderiv 𝕜 n f) s :=
begin
induction n with n IH,
{ assume x hx,
ext1 m,
simp only [iterated_fderiv_within_zero_apply, iterated_fderiv_zero_apply] },
{ assume x hx,
rw [iterated_fderiv_succ_eq_comp_left, iterated_fderiv_within_succ_eq_comp_left],
dsimp,
congr' 1,
rw fderiv_within_of_open hs hx,
apply filter.eventually_eq.fderiv_eq,
filter_upwards [hs.mem_nhds hx],
exact IH }
end
lemma ftaylor_series_within_univ :
ftaylor_series_within 𝕜 f univ = ftaylor_series 𝕜 f :=
begin
ext1 x, ext1 n,
change iterated_fderiv_within 𝕜 n f univ x = iterated_fderiv 𝕜 n f x,
rw iterated_fderiv_within_univ
end
theorem iterated_fderiv_succ_apply_right {n : ℕ} (m : fin (n + 1) → E) :
(iterated_fderiv 𝕜 (n + 1) f x : (fin (n + 1) → E) → F) m
= iterated_fderiv 𝕜 n (λy, fderiv 𝕜 f y) x (init m) (m (last n)) :=
begin
rw [← iterated_fderiv_within_univ, ← iterated_fderiv_within_univ, ← fderiv_within_univ],
exact iterated_fderiv_within_succ_apply_right unique_diff_on_univ (mem_univ _) _
end
/-- Writing explicitly the `n+1`-th derivative as the composition of a currying linear equiv,
and the `n`-th derivative of the derivative. -/
lemma iterated_fderiv_succ_eq_comp_right {n : ℕ} :
iterated_fderiv 𝕜 (n + 1) f x =
((continuous_multilinear_curry_right_equiv' 𝕜 n E F)
∘ (iterated_fderiv 𝕜 n (λy, fderiv 𝕜 f y))) x :=
by { ext m, rw iterated_fderiv_succ_apply_right, refl }
@[simp] lemma iterated_fderiv_one_apply (m : (fin 1) → E) :
(iterated_fderiv 𝕜 1 f x : ((fin 1) → E) → F) m
= (fderiv 𝕜 f x : E → F) (m 0) :=
by { rw [iterated_fderiv_succ_apply_right, iterated_fderiv_zero_apply], refl }
/-- When a function is `C^n` in a set `s` of unique differentiability, it admits
`ftaylor_series_within 𝕜 f s` as a Taylor series up to order `n` in `s`. -/
theorem cont_diff_on_iff_ftaylor_series :
cont_diff 𝕜 n f ↔ has_ftaylor_series_up_to n f (ftaylor_series 𝕜 f) :=
begin
split,
{ rw [← cont_diff_on_univ, ← has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on_univ_iff,
← ftaylor_series_within_univ],
exact λ h, cont_diff_on.ftaylor_series_within h unique_diff_on_univ },
{ assume h, exact ⟨ftaylor_series 𝕜 f, h⟩ }
end
lemma cont_diff_iff_continuous_differentiable :
cont_diff 𝕜 n f ↔
(∀ (m : ℕ), (m : with_top ℕ) ≤ n → continuous (λ x, iterated_fderiv 𝕜 m f x))
∧ (∀ (m : ℕ), (m : with_top ℕ) < n → differentiable 𝕜 (λ x, iterated_fderiv 𝕜 m f x)) :=
by simp [cont_diff_on_univ.symm, continuous_iff_continuous_on_univ,
differentiable_on_univ.symm, iterated_fderiv_within_univ,
cont_diff_on_iff_continuous_on_differentiable_on unique_diff_on_univ]
lemma cont_diff_of_differentiable_iterated_fderiv
(h : ∀(m : ℕ), (m : with_top ℕ) ≤ n → differentiable 𝕜 (iterated_fderiv 𝕜 m f)) :
cont_diff 𝕜 n f :=
cont_diff_iff_continuous_differentiable.2
⟨λ m hm, (h m hm).continuous, λ m hm, (h m (le_of_lt hm))⟩
/-- A function is `C^(n + 1)` if and only if it is differentiable,
and its derivative (formulated in terms of `fderiv`) is `C^n`. -/
theorem cont_diff_succ_iff_fderiv {n : ℕ} :
cont_diff 𝕜 ((n + 1) : ℕ) f ↔
differentiable 𝕜 f ∧ cont_diff 𝕜 n (λ y, fderiv 𝕜 f y) :=
by simp [cont_diff_on_univ.symm, differentiable_on_univ.symm, fderiv_within_univ.symm,
- fderiv_within_univ, cont_diff_on_succ_iff_fderiv_within unique_diff_on_univ,
-with_zero.coe_add, -add_comm]
theorem cont_diff_one_iff_fderiv :
cont_diff 𝕜 1 f ↔ differentiable 𝕜 f ∧ continuous (fderiv 𝕜 f) :=
cont_diff_succ_iff_fderiv.trans $ iff.rfl.and cont_diff_zero
/-- A function is `C^∞` if and only if it is differentiable,
and its derivative (formulated in terms of `fderiv`) is `C^∞`. -/
theorem cont_diff_top_iff_fderiv :
cont_diff 𝕜 ∞ f ↔
differentiable 𝕜 f ∧ cont_diff 𝕜 ∞ (λ y, fderiv 𝕜 f y) :=
begin
simp [cont_diff_on_univ.symm, differentiable_on_univ.symm, fderiv_within_univ.symm,
- fderiv_within_univ],
rw cont_diff_on_top_iff_fderiv_within unique_diff_on_univ,
end
lemma cont_diff.continuous_fderiv
(h : cont_diff 𝕜 n f) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
continuous (λ x, fderiv 𝕜 f x) :=
((cont_diff_succ_iff_fderiv).1 (h.of_le hn)).2.continuous
/-- If a function is at least `C^1`, its bundled derivative (mapping `(x, v)` to `Df(x) v`) is
continuous. -/
lemma cont_diff.continuous_fderiv_apply
(h : cont_diff 𝕜 n f) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
continuous (λp : E × E, (fderiv 𝕜 f p.1 : E → F) p.2) :=
begin
have A : continuous (λq : (E →L[𝕜] F) × E, q.1 q.2) := is_bounded_bilinear_map_apply.continuous,
have B : continuous (λp : E × E, (fderiv 𝕜 f p.1, p.2)),
{ apply continuous.prod_mk _ continuous_snd,
exact continuous.comp (h.continuous_fderiv hn) continuous_fst },
exact A.comp B
end
/-! ### Constants -/
lemma iterated_fderiv_within_zero_fun {n : ℕ} :
iterated_fderiv 𝕜 n (λ x : E, (0 : F)) = 0 :=
begin
induction n with n IH,
{ ext m, simp },
{ ext x m,
rw [iterated_fderiv_succ_apply_left, IH],
change (fderiv 𝕜 (λ (x : E), (0 : (E [×n]→L[𝕜] F))) x : E → (E [×n]→L[𝕜] F)) (m 0) (tail m) = _,
rw fderiv_const,
refl }
end
lemma cont_diff_zero_fun :
cont_diff 𝕜 n (λ x : E, (0 : F)) :=
begin
apply cont_diff_of_differentiable_iterated_fderiv (λm hm, _),
rw iterated_fderiv_within_zero_fun,
apply differentiable_const (0 : (E [×m]→L[𝕜] F))
end
/--
Constants are `C^∞`.
-/
lemma cont_diff_const {c : F} : cont_diff 𝕜 n (λx : E, c) :=
begin
suffices h : cont_diff 𝕜 ∞ (λx : E, c), by exact h.of_le le_top,
rw cont_diff_top_iff_fderiv,
refine ⟨differentiable_const c, _⟩,
rw fderiv_const,
exact cont_diff_zero_fun
end
lemma cont_diff_on_const {c : F} {s : set E} :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (λx : E, c) s :=
cont_diff_const.cont_diff_on
lemma cont_diff_at_const {c : F} :
cont_diff_at 𝕜 n (λx : E, c) x :=
cont_diff_const.cont_diff_at
lemma cont_diff_within_at_const {c : F} :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n (λx : E, c) s x :=
cont_diff_at_const.cont_diff_within_at
@[nontriviality] lemma cont_diff_of_subsingleton [subsingleton F] :
cont_diff 𝕜 n f :=
by { rw [subsingleton.elim f (λ _, 0)], exact cont_diff_const }
@[nontriviality] lemma cont_diff_at_of_subsingleton [subsingleton F] :
cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f x :=
by { rw [subsingleton.elim f (λ _, 0)], exact cont_diff_at_const }
@[nontriviality] lemma cont_diff_within_at_of_subsingleton [subsingleton F] :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x :=
by { rw [subsingleton.elim f (λ _, 0)], exact cont_diff_within_at_const }
@[nontriviality] lemma cont_diff_on_of_subsingleton [subsingleton F] :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s :=
by { rw [subsingleton.elim f (λ _, 0)], exact cont_diff_on_const }
/-! ### Smoothness of linear functions -/
/--
Unbundled bounded linear functions are `C^∞`.
-/
lemma is_bounded_linear_map.cont_diff (hf : is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 f) :
cont_diff 𝕜 n f :=
begin
suffices h : cont_diff 𝕜 ∞ f, by exact h.of_le le_top,
rw cont_diff_top_iff_fderiv,
refine ⟨hf.differentiable, _⟩,
simp_rw [hf.fderiv],
exact cont_diff_const
end
lemma continuous_linear_map.cont_diff (f : E →L[𝕜] F) : cont_diff 𝕜 n f :=
f.is_bounded_linear_map.cont_diff
lemma continuous_linear_equiv.cont_diff (f : E ≃L[𝕜] F) : cont_diff 𝕜 n f :=
(f : E →L[𝕜] F).cont_diff
lemma linear_isometry.cont_diff (f : E →ₗᵢ[𝕜] F) : cont_diff 𝕜 n f :=
f.to_continuous_linear_map.cont_diff
lemma linear_isometry_equiv.cont_diff (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] F) : cont_diff 𝕜 n f :=
(f : E →L[𝕜] F).cont_diff
/--
The identity is `C^∞`.
-/
lemma cont_diff_id : cont_diff 𝕜 n (id : E → E) :=
is_bounded_linear_map.id.cont_diff
lemma cont_diff_within_at_id {s x} : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n (id : E → E) s x :=
cont_diff_id.cont_diff_within_at
lemma cont_diff_at_id {x} : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n (id : E → E) x :=
cont_diff_id.cont_diff_at
lemma cont_diff_on_id {s} : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (id : E → E) s :=
cont_diff_id.cont_diff_on
/--
Bilinear functions are `C^∞`.
-/
lemma is_bounded_bilinear_map.cont_diff (hb : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 b) :
cont_diff 𝕜 n b :=
begin
suffices h : cont_diff 𝕜 ∞ b, by exact h.of_le le_top,
rw cont_diff_top_iff_fderiv,
refine ⟨hb.differentiable, _⟩,
simp [hb.fderiv],
exact hb.is_bounded_linear_map_deriv.cont_diff
end
/-- If `f` admits a Taylor series `p` in a set `s`, and `g` is linear, then `g ∘ f` admits a Taylor
series whose `k`-th term is given by `g ∘ (p k)`. -/
lemma has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on.continuous_linear_map_comp (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(hf : has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on n f p s) :
has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on n (g ∘ f) (λ x k, g.comp_continuous_multilinear_map (p x k)) s :=
begin
set L : Π m : ℕ, (E [×m]→L[𝕜] F) →L[𝕜] (E [×m]→L[𝕜] G) :=
λ m, continuous_linear_map.comp_continuous_multilinear_mapL g,
split,
{ exact λ x hx, congr_arg g (hf.zero_eq x hx) },
{ intros m hm x hx,
convert (L m).has_fderiv_at.comp_has_fderiv_within_at x (hf.fderiv_within m hm x hx) },
{ intros m hm,
convert (L m).continuous.comp_continuous_on (hf.cont m hm) }
end
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the left preserves `C^n` functions in a domain
at a point. -/
lemma cont_diff_within_at.continuous_linear_map_comp (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(hf : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x) :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s x :=
begin
assume m hm,
rcases hf m hm with ⟨u, hu, p, hp⟩,
exact ⟨u, hu, _, hp.continuous_linear_map_comp g⟩,
end
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the left preserves `C^n` functions in a domain
at a point. -/
lemma cont_diff_at.continuous_linear_map_comp (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(hf : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f x) :
cont_diff_at 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) x :=
cont_diff_within_at.continuous_linear_map_comp g hf
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the left preserves `C^n` functions on domains. -/
lemma cont_diff_on.continuous_linear_map_comp (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(hf : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s :=
λ x hx, (hf x hx).continuous_linear_map_comp g
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the left preserves `C^n` functions. -/
lemma cont_diff.continuous_linear_map_comp {f : E → F} (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(hf : cont_diff 𝕜 n f) : cont_diff 𝕜 n (λx, g (f x)) :=
cont_diff_on_univ.1 $ cont_diff_on.continuous_linear_map_comp
_ (cont_diff_on_univ.2 hf)
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the left respects higher differentiability on
domains. -/
lemma continuous_linear_equiv.comp_cont_diff_within_at_iff
(e : F ≃L[𝕜] G) :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n (e ∘ f) s x ↔ cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x :=
⟨λ H, by simpa only [(∘), e.symm.coe_coe, e.symm_apply_apply]
using H.continuous_linear_map_comp (e.symm : G →L[𝕜] F),
λ H, H.continuous_linear_map_comp (e : F →L[𝕜] G)⟩
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the left respects higher differentiability on
domains. -/
lemma continuous_linear_equiv.comp_cont_diff_on_iff
(e : F ≃L[𝕜] G) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (e ∘ f) s ↔ cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s :=
by simp [cont_diff_on, e.comp_cont_diff_within_at_iff]
/-- If `f` admits a Taylor series `p` in a set `s`, and `g` is linear, then `f ∘ g` admits a Taylor
series in `g ⁻¹' s`, whose `k`-th term is given by `p k (g v₁, ..., g vₖ)` . -/
lemma has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on.comp_continuous_linear_map
(hf : has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on n f p s) (g : G →L[𝕜] E) :
has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on n (f ∘ g)
(λ x k, (p (g x) k).comp_continuous_linear_map (λ _, g)) (g ⁻¹' s) :=
begin
let A : Π m : ℕ, (E [×m]→L[𝕜] F) → (G [×m]→L[𝕜] F) :=
λ m h, h.comp_continuous_linear_map (λ _, g),
have hA : ∀ m, is_bounded_linear_map 𝕜 (A m) :=
λ m, is_bounded_linear_map_continuous_multilinear_map_comp_linear g,
split,
{ assume x hx,
simp only [(hf.zero_eq (g x) hx).symm, function.comp_app],
change p (g x) 0 (λ (i : fin 0), g 0) = p (g x) 0 0,
rw continuous_linear_map.map_zero,
refl },
{ assume m hm x hx,
convert ((hA m).has_fderiv_at).comp_has_fderiv_within_at x
((hf.fderiv_within m hm (g x) hx).comp x (g.has_fderiv_within_at) (subset.refl _)),
ext y v,
change p (g x) (nat.succ m) (g ∘ (cons y v)) = p (g x) m.succ (cons (g y) (g ∘ v)),
rw comp_cons },
{ assume m hm,
exact (hA m).continuous.comp_continuous_on
((hf.cont m hm).comp g.continuous.continuous_on (subset.refl _)) }
end
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the right preserves `C^n` functions at a point on
a domain. -/
lemma cont_diff_within_at.comp_continuous_linear_map {x : G}
(g : G →L[𝕜] E) (hf : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s (g x)) :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) x :=
begin
assume m hm,
rcases hf m hm with ⟨u, hu, p, hp⟩,
refine ⟨g ⁻¹' u, _, _, hp.comp_continuous_linear_map g⟩,
apply continuous_within_at.preimage_mem_nhds_within',
{ exact g.continuous.continuous_within_at },
{ apply nhds_within_mono (g x) _ hu,
rw image_insert_eq,
exact insert_subset_insert (image_preimage_subset g s) }
end
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the right preserves `C^n` functions on domains. -/
lemma cont_diff_on.comp_continuous_linear_map
(hf : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s) (g : G →L[𝕜] E) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) :=
λ x hx, (hf (g x) hx).comp_continuous_linear_map g
/-- Composition by continuous linear maps on the right preserves `C^n` functions. -/
lemma cont_diff.comp_continuous_linear_map {f : E → F} {g : G →L[𝕜] E}
(hf : cont_diff 𝕜 n f) : cont_diff 𝕜 n (f ∘ g) :=
cont_diff_on_univ.1 $
cont_diff_on.comp_continuous_linear_map (cont_diff_on_univ.2 hf) _
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the right respects higher differentiability at a
point in a domain. -/
lemma continuous_linear_equiv.cont_diff_within_at_comp_iff (e : G ≃L[𝕜] E) :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n (f ∘ e) (e ⁻¹' s) (e.symm x) ↔
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x :=
begin
split,
{ assume H,
simpa [← preimage_comp, (∘)] using H.comp_continuous_linear_map (e.symm : E →L[𝕜] G) },
{ assume H,
rw [← e.apply_symm_apply x, ← e.coe_coe] at H,
exact H.comp_continuous_linear_map _ },
end
/-- Composition by continuous linear equivs on the right respects higher differentiability on
domains. -/
lemma continuous_linear_equiv.cont_diff_on_comp_iff (e : G ≃L[𝕜] E) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (f ∘ e) (e ⁻¹' s) ↔ cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s :=
begin
refine ⟨λ H, _, λ H, H.comp_continuous_linear_map (e : G →L[𝕜] E)⟩,
have A : f = (f ∘ e) ∘ e.symm,
by { ext y, simp only [function.comp_app], rw e.apply_symm_apply y },
have B : e.symm ⁻¹' (e ⁻¹' s) = s,
by { rw [← preimage_comp, e.self_comp_symm], refl },
rw [A, ← B],
exact H.comp_continuous_linear_map (e.symm : E →L[𝕜] G)
end
/-- If two functions `f` and `g` admit Taylor series `p` and `q` in a set `s`, then the cartesian
product of `f` and `g` admits the cartesian product of `p` and `q` as a Taylor series. -/
lemma has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on.prod (hf : has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on n f p s)
{g : E → G} {q : E → formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E G} (hg : has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on n g q s) :
has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on n (λ y, (f y, g y)) (λ y k, (p y k).prod (q y k)) s :=
begin
set L := λ m, continuous_multilinear_map.prodL 𝕜 (λ i : fin m, E) F G,
split,
{ assume x hx, rw [← hf.zero_eq x hx, ← hg.zero_eq x hx], refl },
{ assume m hm x hx,
convert (L m).has_fderiv_at.comp_has_fderiv_within_at x
((hf.fderiv_within m hm x hx).prod (hg.fderiv_within m hm x hx)) },
{ assume m hm,
exact (L m).continuous.comp_continuous_on ((hf.cont m hm).prod (hg.cont m hm)) }
end
/-- The cartesian product of `C^n` functions at a point in a domain is `C^n`. -/
lemma cont_diff_within_at.prod {s : set E} {f : E → F} {g : E → G}
(hf : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x) (hg : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n g s x) :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n (λx:E, (f x, g x)) s x :=
begin
assume m hm,
rcases hf m hm with ⟨u, hu, p, hp⟩,
rcases hg m hm with ⟨v, hv, q, hq⟩,
exact ⟨u ∩ v, filter.inter_mem hu hv, _,
(hp.mono (inter_subset_left u v)).prod (hq.mono (inter_subset_right u v))⟩
end
/-- The cartesian product of `C^n` functions on domains is `C^n`. -/
lemma cont_diff_on.prod {s : set E} {f : E → F} {g : E → G}
(hf : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s) (hg : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n g s) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (λ x : E, (f x, g x)) s :=
λ x hx, (hf x hx).prod (hg x hx)
/-- The cartesian product of `C^n` functions at a point is `C^n`. -/
lemma cont_diff_at.prod {f : E → F} {g : E → G}
(hf : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f x) (hg : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n g x) :
cont_diff_at 𝕜 n (λ x : E, (f x, g x)) x :=
cont_diff_within_at_univ.1 $ cont_diff_within_at.prod
(cont_diff_within_at_univ.2 hf)
(cont_diff_within_at_univ.2 hg)
/-- The cartesian product of `C^n` functions is `C^n`.-/
lemma cont_diff.prod {f : E → F} {g : E → G} (hf : cont_diff 𝕜 n f) (hg : cont_diff 𝕜 n g) :
cont_diff 𝕜 n (λ x : E, (f x, g x)) :=
cont_diff_on_univ.1 $ cont_diff_on.prod (cont_diff_on_univ.2 hf)
(cont_diff_on_univ.2 hg)
/-!
### Composition of `C^n` functions
We show that the composition of `C^n` functions is `C^n`. One way to prove it would be to write
the `n`-th derivative of the composition (this is Faà di Bruno's formula) and check its continuity,
but this is very painful. Instead, we go for a simple inductive proof. Assume it is done for `n`.
Then, to check it for `n+1`, one needs to check that the derivative of `g ∘ f` is `C^n`, i.e.,
that `Dg(f x) ⬝ Df(x)` is `C^n`. The term `Dg (f x)` is the composition of two `C^n` functions, so
it is `C^n` by the inductive assumption. The term `Df(x)` is also `C^n`. Then, the matrix
multiplication is the application of a bilinear map (which is `C^∞`, and therefore `C^n`) to
`x ↦ (Dg(f x), Df x)`. As the composition of two `C^n` maps, it is again `C^n`, and we are done.
There is a subtlety in this argument: we apply the inductive assumption to functions on other Banach
spaces. In maths, one would say: prove by induction over `n` that, for all `C^n` maps between all
pairs of Banach spaces, their composition is `C^n`. In Lean, this is fine as long as the spaces
stay in the same universe. This is not the case in the above argument: if `E` lives in universe `u`
and `F` lives in universe `v`, then linear maps from `E` to `F` (to which the derivative of `f`
belongs) is in universe `max u v`. If one could quantify over finitely many universes, the above
proof would work fine, but this is not the case. One could still write the proof considering spaces
in any universe in `u, v, w, max u v, max v w, max u v w`, but it would be extremely tedious and
lead to a lot of duplication. Instead, we formulate the above proof when all spaces live in the same
universe (where everything is fine), and then we deduce the general result by lifting all our spaces
to a common universe. We use the trick that any space `H` is isomorphic through a continuous linear
equiv to `continuous_multilinear_map (λ (i : fin 0), E × F × G) H` to change the universe level,
and then argue that composing with such a linear equiv does not change the fact of being `C^n`,
which we have already proved previously.
-/
/-- Auxiliary lemma proving that the composition of `C^n` functions on domains is `C^n` when all
spaces live in the same universe. Use instead `cont_diff_on.comp` which removes the universe
assumption (but is deduced from this one). -/
private lemma cont_diff_on.comp_same_univ
{Eu : Type u} [normed_group Eu] [normed_space 𝕜 Eu]
{Fu : Type u} [normed_group Fu] [normed_space 𝕜 Fu]
{Gu : Type u} [normed_group Gu] [normed_space 𝕜 Gu]
{s : set Eu} {t : set Fu} {g : Fu → Gu} {f : Eu → Fu}
(hg : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n g t) (hf : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s) (st : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s :=
begin
unfreezingI { induction n using with_top.nat_induction with n IH Itop generalizing Eu Fu Gu },
{ rw cont_diff_on_zero at hf hg ⊢,
exact continuous_on.comp hg hf st },
{ rw cont_diff_on_succ_iff_has_fderiv_within_at at hg ⊢,
assume x hx,
rcases (cont_diff_on_succ_iff_has_fderiv_within_at.1 hf) x hx
with ⟨u, hu, f', hf', f'_diff⟩,
rcases hg (f x) (st hx) with ⟨v, hv, g', hg', g'_diff⟩,
rw insert_eq_of_mem hx at hu ⊢,
have xu : x ∈ u := mem_of_mem_nhds_within hx hu,
let w := s ∩ (u ∩ f⁻¹' v),
have wv : w ⊆ f ⁻¹' v := λ y hy, hy.2.2,
have wu : w ⊆ u := λ y hy, hy.2.1,
have ws : w ⊆ s := λ y hy, hy.1,
refine ⟨w, _, λ y, (g' (f y)).comp (f' y), _, _⟩,
show w ∈ 𝓝[s] x,
{ apply filter.inter_mem self_mem_nhds_within,
apply filter.inter_mem hu,
apply continuous_within_at.preimage_mem_nhds_within',
{ rw ← continuous_within_at_inter' hu,
exact (hf' x xu).differentiable_within_at.continuous_within_at.mono
(inter_subset_right _ _) },
{ apply nhds_within_mono _ _ hv,
exact subset.trans (image_subset_iff.mpr st) (subset_insert (f x) t) } },
show ∀ y ∈ w,
has_fderiv_within_at (g ∘ f) ((g' (f y)).comp (f' y)) w y,
{ rintros y ⟨ys, yu, yv⟩,
exact (hg' (f y) yv).comp y ((hf' y yu).mono wu) wv },
show cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (λ y, (g' (f y)).comp (f' y)) w,
{ have A : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (λ y, g' (f y)) w :=
IH g'_diff ((hf.of_le (with_top.coe_le_coe.2 (nat.le_succ n))).mono ws) wv,
have B : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f' w := f'_diff.mono wu,
have C : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (λ y, (f' y, g' (f y))) w :=
cont_diff_on.prod B A,
have D : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (λ(p : (Eu →L[𝕜] Fu) × (Fu →L[𝕜] Gu)), p.2.comp p.1) univ :=
is_bounded_bilinear_map_comp.cont_diff.cont_diff_on,
exact IH D C (subset_univ _) } },
{ rw cont_diff_on_top at hf hg ⊢,
assume n,
apply Itop n (hg n) (hf n) st }
end
/-- The composition of `C^n` functions on domains is `C^n`. -/
lemma cont_diff_on.comp
{s : set E} {t : set F} {g : F → G} {f : E → F}
(hg : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n g t) (hf : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s) (st : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s :=
begin
/- we lift all the spaces to a common universe, as we have already proved the result in this
situation. For the lift, we use the trick that `H` is isomorphic through a
continuous linear equiv to `continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ (i : fin 0), (E × F × G)) H`, and
continuous linear equivs respect smoothness classes. -/
let Eu := continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ (i : fin 0), (E × F × G)) E,
letI : normed_group Eu := by apply_instance,
letI : normed_space 𝕜 Eu := by apply_instance,
let Fu := continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ (i : fin 0), (E × F × G)) F,
letI : normed_group Fu := by apply_instance,
letI : normed_space 𝕜 Fu := by apply_instance,
let Gu := continuous_multilinear_map 𝕜 (λ (i : fin 0), (E × F × G)) G,
letI : normed_group Gu := by apply_instance,
letI : normed_space 𝕜 Gu := by apply_instance,
-- declare the isomorphisms
let isoE : Eu ≃L[𝕜] E := continuous_multilinear_curry_fin0 𝕜 (E × F × G) E,
let isoF : Fu ≃L[𝕜] F := continuous_multilinear_curry_fin0 𝕜 (E × F × G) F,
let isoG : Gu ≃L[𝕜] G := continuous_multilinear_curry_fin0 𝕜 (E × F × G) G,
-- lift the functions to the new spaces, check smoothness there, and then go back.
let fu : Eu → Fu := (isoF.symm ∘ f) ∘ isoE,
have fu_diff : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n fu (isoE ⁻¹' s),
by rwa [isoE.cont_diff_on_comp_iff, isoF.symm.comp_cont_diff_on_iff],
let gu : Fu → Gu := (isoG.symm ∘ g) ∘ isoF,
have gu_diff : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n gu (isoF ⁻¹' t),
by rwa [isoF.cont_diff_on_comp_iff, isoG.symm.comp_cont_diff_on_iff],
have main : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (gu ∘ fu) (isoE ⁻¹' s),
{ apply cont_diff_on.comp_same_univ gu_diff fu_diff,
assume y hy,
simp only [fu, continuous_linear_equiv.coe_apply, function.comp_app, mem_preimage],
rw isoF.apply_symm_apply (f (isoE y)),
exact st hy },
have : gu ∘ fu = (isoG.symm ∘ (g ∘ f)) ∘ isoE,
{ ext y,
simp only [function.comp_apply, gu, fu],
rw isoF.apply_symm_apply (f (isoE y)) },
rwa [this, isoE.cont_diff_on_comp_iff, isoG.symm.comp_cont_diff_on_iff] at main
end
/-- The composition of `C^n` functions on domains is `C^n`. -/
lemma cont_diff_on.comp'
{s : set E} {t : set F} {g : F → G} {f : E → F}
(hg : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n g t) (hf : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) (s ∩ f⁻¹' t) :=
hg.comp (hf.mono (inter_subset_left _ _)) (inter_subset_right _ _)
/-- The composition of a `C^n` function on a domain with a `C^n` function is `C^n`. -/
lemma cont_diff.comp_cont_diff_on {s : set E} {g : F → G} {f : E → F}
(hg : cont_diff 𝕜 n g) (hf : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s :=
(cont_diff_on_univ.2 hg).comp hf subset_preimage_univ
/-- The composition of `C^n` functions is `C^n`. -/
lemma cont_diff.comp {g : F → G} {f : E → F}
(hg : cont_diff 𝕜 n g) (hf : cont_diff 𝕜 n f) :
cont_diff 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) :=
cont_diff_on_univ.1 $ cont_diff_on.comp (cont_diff_on_univ.2 hg)
(cont_diff_on_univ.2 hf) (subset_univ _)
/-- The composition of `C^n` functions at points in domains is `C^n`. -/
lemma cont_diff_within_at.comp
{s : set E} {t : set F} {g : F → G} {f : E → F} (x : E)
(hg : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n g t (f x))
(hf : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x) (st : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t) :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s x :=
begin
assume m hm,
rcases hg.cont_diff_on hm with ⟨u, u_nhd, ut, hu⟩,
rcases hf.cont_diff_on hm with ⟨v, v_nhd, vs, hv⟩,
have xmem : x ∈ f ⁻¹' u ∩ v :=
⟨(mem_of_mem_nhds_within (mem_insert (f x) _) u_nhd : _),
mem_of_mem_nhds_within (mem_insert x s) v_nhd⟩,
have : f ⁻¹' u ∈ 𝓝[insert x s] x,
{ apply hf.continuous_within_at.insert_self.preimage_mem_nhds_within',
apply nhds_within_mono _ _ u_nhd,
rw image_insert_eq,
exact insert_subset_insert (image_subset_iff.mpr st) },
have Z := ((hu.comp (hv.mono (inter_subset_right (f ⁻¹' u) v)) (inter_subset_left _ _))
.cont_diff_within_at) xmem m le_rfl,
have : 𝓝[f ⁻¹' u ∩ v] x = 𝓝[insert x s] x,
{ have A : f ⁻¹' u ∩ v = (insert x s) ∩ (f ⁻¹' u ∩ v),
{ apply subset.antisymm _ (inter_subset_right _ _),
rintros y ⟨hy1, hy2⟩,
simp [hy1, hy2, vs hy2] },
rw [A, ← nhds_within_restrict''],
exact filter.inter_mem this v_nhd },
rwa [insert_eq_of_mem xmem, this] at Z,
end
/-- The composition of `C^n` functions at points in domains is `C^n`. -/
lemma cont_diff_within_at.comp' {s : set E} {t : set F} {g : F → G}
{f : E → F} (x : E)
(hg : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n g t (f x)) (hf : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x) :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) (s ∩ f⁻¹' t) x :=
hg.comp x (hf.mono (inter_subset_left _ _)) (inter_subset_right _ _)
lemma cont_diff_at.comp_cont_diff_within_at {n} (x : E)
(hg : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n g (f x)) (hf : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x) :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s x :=
hg.comp x hf (maps_to_univ _ _)
/-- The composition of `C^n` functions at points is `C^n`. -/
lemma cont_diff_at.comp (x : E)
(hg : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n g (f x))
(hf : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f x) :
cont_diff_at 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) x :=
hg.comp x hf subset_preimage_univ
lemma cont_diff.comp_cont_diff_within_at
{g : F → G} {f : E → F} (h : cont_diff 𝕜 n g)
(hf : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f t x) :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) t x :=
begin
have : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n g univ (f x) :=
h.cont_diff_at.cont_diff_within_at,
exact this.comp x hf (subset_univ _),
end
lemma cont_diff.comp_cont_diff_at {g : F → G} {f : E → F} (x : E)
(hg : cont_diff 𝕜 n g) (hf : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f x) : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) x :=
hg.comp_cont_diff_within_at hf
/-!
### Smoothness of projections
-/
/-- The first projection in a product is `C^∞`. -/
lemma cont_diff_fst : cont_diff 𝕜 n (prod.fst : E × F → E) :=
is_bounded_linear_map.cont_diff is_bounded_linear_map.fst
/-- Postcomposing `f` with `prod.fst` is `C^n` -/
lemma cont_diff.fst {f : E → F × G} (hf : cont_diff 𝕜 n f) : cont_diff 𝕜 n (λ x, (f x).1) :=
cont_diff_fst.comp hf
/-- Precomposing `f` with `prod.fst` is `C^n` -/
lemma cont_diff.fst' {f : E → G} (hf : cont_diff 𝕜 n f) : cont_diff 𝕜 n (λ x : E × F, f x.1) :=
hf.comp cont_diff_fst
/-- The first projection on a domain in a product is `C^∞`. -/
lemma cont_diff_on_fst {s : set (E × F)} : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (prod.fst : E × F → E) s :=
cont_diff.cont_diff_on cont_diff_fst
lemma cont_diff_on.fst {f : E → F × G} {s : set E} (hf : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (λ x, (f x).1) s :=
cont_diff_fst.comp_cont_diff_on hf
/-- The first projection at a point in a product is `C^∞`. -/
lemma cont_diff_at_fst {p : E × F} : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n (prod.fst : E × F → E) p :=
cont_diff_fst.cont_diff_at
/-- Postcomposing `f` with `prod.fst` is `C^n` at `(x, y)` -/
lemma cont_diff_at.fst {f : E → F × G} {x : E} (hf : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f x) :
cont_diff_at 𝕜 n (λ x, (f x).1) x :=
cont_diff_at_fst.comp x hf
/-- Precomposing `f` with `prod.fst` is `C^n` at `(x, y)` -/
lemma cont_diff_at.fst' {f : E → G} {x : E} {y : F} (hf : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f x) :
cont_diff_at 𝕜 n (λ x : E × F, f x.1) (x, y) :=
cont_diff_at.comp (x, y) hf cont_diff_at_fst
/-- Precomposing `f` with `prod.fst` is `C^n` at `x : E × F` -/
lemma cont_diff_at.fst'' {f : E → G} {x : E × F} (hf : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f x.1) :
cont_diff_at 𝕜 n (λ x : E × F, f x.1) x :=
hf.comp x cont_diff_at_fst
/-- The first projection within a domain at a point in a product is `C^∞`. -/
lemma cont_diff_within_at_fst {s : set (E × F)} {p : E × F} :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n (prod.fst : E × F → E) s p :=
cont_diff_fst.cont_diff_within_at
/-- The second projection in a product is `C^∞`. -/
lemma cont_diff_snd : cont_diff 𝕜 n (prod.snd : E × F → F) :=
is_bounded_linear_map.cont_diff is_bounded_linear_map.snd
/-- Postcomposing `f` with `prod.snd` is `C^n` -/
lemma cont_diff.snd {f : E → F × G} (hf : cont_diff 𝕜 n f) : cont_diff 𝕜 n (λ x, (f x).2) :=
cont_diff_snd.comp hf
/-- Precomposing `f` with `prod.snd` is `C^n` -/
lemma cont_diff.snd' {f : F → G} (hf : cont_diff 𝕜 n f) : cont_diff 𝕜 n (λ x : E × F, f x.2) :=
hf.comp cont_diff_snd
/-- The second projection on a domain in a product is `C^∞`. -/
lemma cont_diff_on_snd {s : set (E × F)} : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (prod.snd : E × F → F) s :=
cont_diff.cont_diff_on cont_diff_snd
lemma cont_diff_on.snd {f : E → F × G} {s : set E} (hf : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (λ x, (f x).2) s :=
cont_diff_snd.comp_cont_diff_on hf
/-- The second projection at a point in a product is `C^∞`. -/
lemma cont_diff_at_snd {p : E × F} : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n (prod.snd : E × F → F) p :=
cont_diff_snd.cont_diff_at
/-- Postcomposing `f` with `prod.snd` is `C^n` at `x` -/
lemma cont_diff_at.snd {f : E → F × G} {x : E} (hf : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f x) :
cont_diff_at 𝕜 n (λ x, (f x).2) x :=
cont_diff_at_snd.comp x hf
/-- Precomposing `f` with `prod.snd` is `C^n` at `(x, y)` -/
lemma cont_diff_at.snd' {f : F → G} {x : E} {y : F} (hf : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f y) :
cont_diff_at 𝕜 n (λ x : E × F, f x.2) (x, y) :=
cont_diff_at.comp (x, y) hf cont_diff_at_snd
/-- Precomposing `f` with `prod.snd` is `C^n` at `x : E × F` -/
lemma cont_diff_at.snd'' {f : F → G} {x : E × F} (hf : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f x.2) :
cont_diff_at 𝕜 n (λ x : E × F, f x.2) x :=
hf.comp x cont_diff_at_snd
/-- The second projection within a domain at a point in a product is `C^∞`. -/
lemma cont_diff_within_at_snd {s : set (E × F)} {p : E × F} :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n (prod.snd : E × F → F) s p :=
cont_diff_snd.cont_diff_within_at
section n_ary
variables {E₁ E₂ E₃ E₄ : Type*}
variables [normed_group E₁] [normed_group E₂] [normed_group E₃] [normed_group E₄]
variables [normed_space 𝕜 E₁] [normed_space 𝕜 E₂] [normed_space 𝕜 E₃] [normed_space 𝕜 E₄]
lemma cont_diff.comp₂ {g : E₁ × E₂ → G} {f₁ : F → E₁} {f₂ : F → E₂}
(hg : cont_diff 𝕜 n g) (hf₁ : cont_diff 𝕜 n f₁) (hf₂ : cont_diff 𝕜 n f₂) :
cont_diff 𝕜 n (λ x, g (f₁ x, f₂ x)) :=
hg.comp $ hf₁.prod hf₂
lemma cont_diff.comp₃ {g : E₁ × E₂ × E₃ → G} {f₁ : F → E₁} {f₂ : F → E₂} {f₃ : F → E₃}
(hg : cont_diff 𝕜 n g) (hf₁ : cont_diff 𝕜 n f₁) (hf₂ : cont_diff 𝕜 n f₂)
(hf₃ : cont_diff 𝕜 n f₃) : cont_diff 𝕜 n (λ x, g (f₁ x, f₂ x, f₃ x)) :=
hg.comp₂ hf₁ $ hf₂.prod hf₃
end n_ary
/--
The natural equivalence `(E × F) × G ≃ E × (F × G)` is smooth.
Warning: if you think you need this lemma, it is likely that you can simplify your proof by
reformulating the lemma that you're applying next using the tips in
Note [continuity lemma statement]
-/
lemma cont_diff_prod_assoc : cont_diff 𝕜 ⊤ $ equiv.prod_assoc E F G :=
(linear_isometry_equiv.prod_assoc 𝕜 E F G).cont_diff
/--
The natural equivalence `E × (F × G) ≃ (E × F) × G` is smooth.
Warning: see remarks attached to `cont_diff_prod_assoc`
-/
lemma cont_diff_prod_assoc_symm : cont_diff 𝕜 ⊤ $ (equiv.prod_assoc E F G).symm :=
(linear_isometry_equiv.prod_assoc 𝕜 E F G).symm.cont_diff
/-! ### Bundled derivatives -/
/-- The bundled derivative of a `C^{n+1}` function is `C^n`. -/
lemma cont_diff_on_fderiv_within_apply {m n : with_top ℕ} {s : set E}
{f : E → F} (hf : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s) (hs : unique_diff_on 𝕜 s) (hmn : m + 1 ≤ n) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 m (λp : E × E, (fderiv_within 𝕜 f s p.1 : E →L[𝕜] F) p.2)
(s ×ˢ (univ : set E)) :=
begin
have A : cont_diff 𝕜 m (λp : (E →L[𝕜] F) × E, p.1 p.2),
{ apply is_bounded_bilinear_map.cont_diff,
exact is_bounded_bilinear_map_apply },
have B : cont_diff_on 𝕜 m
(λ (p : E × E), ((fderiv_within 𝕜 f s p.fst), p.snd)) (s ×ˢ univ),
{ apply cont_diff_on.prod _ _,
{ have I : cont_diff_on 𝕜 m (λ (x : E), fderiv_within 𝕜 f s x) s :=
hf.fderiv_within hs hmn,
have J : cont_diff_on 𝕜 m (λ (x : E × E), x.1) (s ×ˢ univ) :=
cont_diff_fst.cont_diff_on,
exact cont_diff_on.comp I J (prod_subset_preimage_fst _ _) },
{ apply cont_diff.cont_diff_on _ ,
apply is_bounded_linear_map.snd.cont_diff } },
exact A.comp_cont_diff_on B
end
/-- The bundled derivative of a `C^{n+1}` function is `C^n`. -/
lemma cont_diff.cont_diff_fderiv_apply {f : E → F}
(hf : cont_diff 𝕜 n f) (hmn : m + 1 ≤ n) :
cont_diff 𝕜 m (λp : E × E, (fderiv 𝕜 f p.1 : E →L[𝕜] F) p.2) :=
begin
rw ← cont_diff_on_univ at ⊢ hf,
rw [← fderiv_within_univ, ← univ_prod_univ],
exact cont_diff_on_fderiv_within_apply hf unique_diff_on_univ hmn
end
/-!
### Smoothness of functions `f : E → Π i, F' i`
-/
section pi
variables {ι ι' : Type*} [fintype ι] [fintype ι'] {F' : ι → Type*} [Π i, normed_group (F' i)]
[Π i, normed_space 𝕜 (F' i)] {φ : Π i, E → F' i}
{p' : Π i, E → formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E (F' i)}
{Φ : E → Π i, F' i} {P' : E → formal_multilinear_series 𝕜 E (Π i, F' i)}
lemma has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on_pi :
has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on n (λ x i, φ i x)
(λ x m, continuous_multilinear_map.pi (λ i, p' i x m)) s ↔
∀ i, has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on n (φ i) (p' i) s :=
begin
set pr := @continuous_linear_map.proj 𝕜 _ ι F' _ _ _,
letI : Π (m : ℕ) (i : ι), normed_space 𝕜 (E [×m]→L[𝕜] (F' i)) := λ m i, infer_instance,
set L : Π m : ℕ, (Π i, E [×m]→L[𝕜] (F' i)) ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] (E [×m]→L[𝕜] (Π i, F' i)) :=
λ m, continuous_multilinear_map.piₗᵢ _ _,
refine ⟨λ h i, _, λ h, ⟨λ x hx, _, _, _⟩⟩,
{ convert h.continuous_linear_map_comp (pr i),
ext, refl },
{ ext1 i,
exact (h i).zero_eq x hx },
{ intros m hm x hx,
have := has_fderiv_within_at_pi.2 (λ i, (h i).fderiv_within m hm x hx),
convert (L m).has_fderiv_at.comp_has_fderiv_within_at x this },
{ intros m hm,
have := continuous_on_pi.2 (λ i, (h i).cont m hm),
convert (L m).continuous.comp_continuous_on this }
end
@[simp] lemma has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on_pi' :
has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on n Φ P' s ↔
∀ i, has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on n (λ x, Φ x i)
(λ x m, (@continuous_linear_map.proj 𝕜 _ ι F' _ _ _ i).comp_continuous_multilinear_map
(P' x m)) s :=
by { convert has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on_pi, ext, refl }
lemma cont_diff_within_at_pi :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n Φ s x ↔
∀ i, cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n (λ x, Φ x i) s x :=
begin
set pr := @continuous_linear_map.proj 𝕜 _ ι F' _ _ _,
refine ⟨λ h i, h.continuous_linear_map_comp (pr i), λ h m hm, _⟩,
choose u hux p hp using λ i, h i m hm,
exact ⟨⋂ i, u i, filter.Inter_mem.2 hux, _,
has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on_pi.2 (λ i, (hp i).mono $ Inter_subset _ _)⟩,
end
lemma cont_diff_on_pi :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 n Φ s ↔ ∀ i, cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (λ x, Φ x i) s :=
⟨λ h i x hx, cont_diff_within_at_pi.1 (h x hx) _,
λ h x hx, cont_diff_within_at_pi.2 (λ i, h i x hx)⟩
lemma cont_diff_at_pi :
cont_diff_at 𝕜 n Φ x ↔ ∀ i, cont_diff_at 𝕜 n (λ x, Φ x i) x :=
cont_diff_within_at_pi
lemma cont_diff_pi :
cont_diff 𝕜 n Φ ↔ ∀ i, cont_diff 𝕜 n (λ x, Φ x i) :=
by simp only [← cont_diff_on_univ, cont_diff_on_pi]
variables (𝕜 E)
lemma cont_diff_apply (i : ι) : cont_diff 𝕜 n (λ (f : ι → E), f i) :=
cont_diff_pi.mp cont_diff_id i
lemma cont_diff_apply_apply (i : ι) (j : ι') : cont_diff 𝕜 n (λ (f : ι → ι' → E), f i j) :=
cont_diff_pi.mp (cont_diff_apply 𝕜 (ι' → E) i) j
variables {𝕜 E}
end pi
/-! ### Sum of two functions -/
/- The sum is smooth. -/
lemma cont_diff_add : cont_diff 𝕜 n (λp : F × F, p.1 + p.2) :=
(is_bounded_linear_map.fst.add is_bounded_linear_map.snd).cont_diff
/-- The sum of two `C^n` functions within a set at a point is `C^n` within this set
at this point. -/
lemma cont_diff_within_at.add {s : set E} {f g : E → F}
(hf : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x) (hg : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n g s x) :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n (λx, f x + g x) s x :=
cont_diff_add.cont_diff_within_at.comp x (hf.prod hg) subset_preimage_univ
/-- The sum of two `C^n` functions at a point is `C^n` at this point. -/
lemma cont_diff_at.add {f g : E → F} (hf : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f x) (hg : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n g x) :
cont_diff_at 𝕜 n (λx, f x + g x) x :=
by rw [← cont_diff_within_at_univ] at *; exact hf.add hg
/-- The sum of two `C^n`functions is `C^n`. -/
lemma cont_diff.add {f g : E → F} (hf : cont_diff 𝕜 n f) (hg : cont_diff 𝕜 n g) :
cont_diff 𝕜 n (λx, f x + g x) :=
cont_diff_add.comp (hf.prod hg)
/-- The sum of two `C^n` functions on a domain is `C^n`. -/
lemma cont_diff_on.add {s : set E} {f g : E → F}
(hf : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s) (hg : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n g s) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (λx, f x + g x) s :=
λ x hx, (hf x hx).add (hg x hx)
/-! ### Negative -/
/- The negative is smooth. -/
lemma cont_diff_neg : cont_diff 𝕜 n (λp : F, -p) :=
is_bounded_linear_map.id.neg.cont_diff
/-- The negative of a `C^n` function within a domain at a point is `C^n` within this domain at
this point. -/
lemma cont_diff_within_at.neg {s : set E} {f : E → F}
(hf : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x) : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n (λx, -f x) s x :=
cont_diff_neg.cont_diff_within_at.comp x hf subset_preimage_univ
/-- The negative of a `C^n` function at a point is `C^n` at this point. -/
lemma cont_diff_at.neg {f : E → F}
(hf : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f x) : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n (λx, -f x) x :=
by rw ← cont_diff_within_at_univ at *; exact hf.neg
/-- The negative of a `C^n`function is `C^n`. -/
lemma cont_diff.neg {f : E → F} (hf : cont_diff 𝕜 n f) : cont_diff 𝕜 n (λx, -f x) :=
cont_diff_neg.comp hf
/-- The negative of a `C^n` function on a domain is `C^n`. -/
lemma cont_diff_on.neg {s : set E} {f : E → F}
(hf : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s) : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (λx, -f x) s :=
λ x hx, (hf x hx).neg
/-! ### Subtraction -/
/-- The difference of two `C^n` functions within a set at a point is `C^n` within this set
at this point. -/
lemma cont_diff_within_at.sub {s : set E} {f g : E → F}
(hf : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x) (hg : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n g s x) :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n (λx, f x - g x) s x :=
by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add hg.neg
/-- The difference of two `C^n` functions at a point is `C^n` at this point. -/
lemma cont_diff_at.sub {f g : E → F}
(hf : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f x) (hg : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n g x) :
cont_diff_at 𝕜 n (λx, f x - g x) x :=
by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add hg.neg
/-- The difference of two `C^n` functions on a domain is `C^n`. -/
lemma cont_diff_on.sub {s : set E} {f g : E → F}
(hf : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s) (hg : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n g s) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (λx, f x - g x) s :=
by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add hg.neg
/-- The difference of two `C^n` functions is `C^n`. -/
lemma cont_diff.sub {f g : E → F}
(hf : cont_diff 𝕜 n f) (hg : cont_diff 𝕜 n g) : cont_diff 𝕜 n (λx, f x - g x) :=
by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add hg.neg
/-! ### Sum of finitely many functions -/
lemma cont_diff_within_at.sum
{ι : Type*} {f : ι → E → F} {s : finset ι} {t : set E} {x : E}
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n (λ x, f i x) t x) :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n (λ x, (∑ i in s, f i x)) t x :=
begin
classical,
induction s using finset.induction_on with i s is IH,
{ simp [cont_diff_within_at_const] },
{ simp only [is, finset.sum_insert, not_false_iff],
exact (h _ (finset.mem_insert_self i s)).add (IH (λ j hj, h _ (finset.mem_insert_of_mem hj))) }
end
lemma cont_diff_at.sum
{ι : Type*} {f : ι → E → F} {s : finset ι} {x : E}
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, cont_diff_at 𝕜 n (λ x, f i x) x) :
cont_diff_at 𝕜 n (λ x, (∑ i in s, f i x)) x :=
by rw [← cont_diff_within_at_univ] at *; exact cont_diff_within_at.sum h
lemma cont_diff_on.sum
{ι : Type*} {f : ι → E → F} {s : finset ι} {t : set E}
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (λ x, f i x) t) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (λ x, (∑ i in s, f i x)) t :=
λ x hx, cont_diff_within_at.sum (λ i hi, h i hi x hx)
lemma cont_diff.sum
{ι : Type*} {f : ι → E → F} {s : finset ι}
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, cont_diff 𝕜 n (λ x, f i x)) :
cont_diff 𝕜 n (λ x, (∑ i in s, f i x)) :=
by simp [← cont_diff_on_univ] at *; exact cont_diff_on.sum h
/-! ### Product of two functions -/
/- The product is smooth. -/
lemma cont_diff_mul : cont_diff 𝕜 n (λ p : 𝕜 × 𝕜, p.1 * p.2) :=
is_bounded_bilinear_map_mul.cont_diff
/-- The product of two `C^n` functions within a set at a point is `C^n` within this set
at this point. -/
lemma cont_diff_within_at.mul {s : set E} {f g : E → 𝕜}
(hf : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x) (hg : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n g s x) :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n (λ x, f x * g x) s x :=
cont_diff_mul.cont_diff_within_at.comp x (hf.prod hg) subset_preimage_univ
/-- The product of two `C^n` functions at a point is `C^n` at this point. -/
lemma cont_diff_at.mul {f g : E → 𝕜}
(hf : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f x) (hg : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n g x) :
cont_diff_at 𝕜 n (λ x, f x * g x) x :=
by rw [← cont_diff_within_at_univ] at *; exact hf.mul hg
/-- The product of two `C^n` functions on a domain is `C^n`. -/
lemma cont_diff_on.mul {s : set E} {f g : E → 𝕜}
(hf : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s) (hg : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n g s) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (λ x, f x * g x) s :=
λ x hx, (hf x hx).mul (hg x hx)
/-- The product of two `C^n`functions is `C^n`. -/
lemma cont_diff.mul {f g : E → 𝕜} (hf : cont_diff 𝕜 n f) (hg : cont_diff 𝕜 n g) :
cont_diff 𝕜 n (λ x, f x * g x) :=
cont_diff_mul.comp (hf.prod hg)
lemma cont_diff_within_at.div_const {f : E → 𝕜} {n} {c : 𝕜}
(hf : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x) :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n (λ x, f x / c) s x :=
by simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using hf.mul cont_diff_within_at_const
lemma cont_diff_at.div_const {f : E → 𝕜} {n} {c : 𝕜} (hf : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f x) :
cont_diff_at 𝕜 n (λ x, f x / c) x :=
by simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using hf.mul cont_diff_at_const
lemma cont_diff_on.div_const {f : E → 𝕜} {n} {c : 𝕜} (hf : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (λ x, f x / c) s :=
by simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using hf.mul cont_diff_on_const
lemma cont_diff.div_const {f : E → 𝕜} {n} {c : 𝕜} (hf : cont_diff 𝕜 n f) :
cont_diff 𝕜 n (λ x, f x / c) :=
by simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using hf.mul cont_diff_const
lemma cont_diff.pow {f : E → 𝕜}
(hf : cont_diff 𝕜 n f) :
∀ m : ℕ, cont_diff 𝕜 n (λ x, (f x) ^ m)
| 0 := by simpa using cont_diff_const
| (m + 1) := by simpa [pow_succ] using hf.mul (cont_diff.pow m)
lemma cont_diff_at.pow {f : E → 𝕜} (hf : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f x)
(m : ℕ) : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n (λ y, f y ^ m) x :=
(cont_diff_id.pow m).cont_diff_at.comp x hf
lemma cont_diff_within_at.pow {f : E → 𝕜}
(hf : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x) (m : ℕ) :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n (λ y, f y ^ m) s x :=
(cont_diff_id.pow m).cont_diff_at.comp_cont_diff_within_at x hf
lemma cont_diff_on.pow {f : E → 𝕜}
(hf : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s) (m : ℕ) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (λ y, f y ^ m) s :=
λ y hy, (hf y hy).pow m
/-! ### Scalar multiplication -/
/- The scalar multiplication is smooth. -/
lemma cont_diff_smul : cont_diff 𝕜 n (λ p : 𝕜 × F, p.1 • p.2) :=
is_bounded_bilinear_map_smul.cont_diff
/-- The scalar multiplication of two `C^n` functions within a set at a point is `C^n` within this
set at this point. -/
lemma cont_diff_within_at.smul {s : set E} {f : E → 𝕜} {g : E → F}
(hf : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x) (hg : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n g s x) :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n (λ x, f x • g x) s x :=
cont_diff_smul.cont_diff_within_at.comp x (hf.prod hg) subset_preimage_univ
/-- The scalar multiplication of two `C^n` functions at a point is `C^n` at this point. -/
lemma cont_diff_at.smul {f : E → 𝕜} {g : E → F}
(hf : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f x) (hg : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n g x) :
cont_diff_at 𝕜 n (λ x, f x • g x) x :=
by rw [← cont_diff_within_at_univ] at *; exact hf.smul hg
/-- The scalar multiplication of two `C^n` functions is `C^n`. -/
lemma cont_diff.smul {f : E → 𝕜} {g : E → F} (hf : cont_diff 𝕜 n f) (hg : cont_diff 𝕜 n g) :
cont_diff 𝕜 n (λ x, f x • g x) :=
cont_diff_smul.comp (hf.prod hg)
/-- The scalar multiplication of two `C^n` functions on a domain is `C^n`. -/
lemma cont_diff_on.smul {s : set E} {f : E → 𝕜} {g : E → F}
(hf : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s) (hg : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n g s) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (λ x, f x • g x) s :=
λ x hx, (hf x hx).smul (hg x hx)
/-! ### Cartesian product of two functions -/
section prod_map
variables {E' : Type*} [normed_group E'] [normed_space 𝕜 E']
variables {F' : Type*} [normed_group F'] [normed_space 𝕜 F']
/-- The product map of two `C^n` functions within a set at a point is `C^n`
within the product set at the product point. -/
lemma cont_diff_within_at.prod_map'
{s : set E} {t : set E'} {f : E → F} {g : E' → F'} {p : E × E'}
(hf : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s p.1) (hg : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n g t p.2) :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n (prod.map f g) (s ×ˢ t) p :=
(hf.comp p cont_diff_within_at_fst (prod_subset_preimage_fst _ _)).prod
(hg.comp p cont_diff_within_at_snd (prod_subset_preimage_snd _ _))
lemma cont_diff_within_at.prod_map
{s : set E} {t : set E'} {f : E → F} {g : E' → F'} {x : E} {y : E'}
(hf : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x) (hg : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n g t y) :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n (prod.map f g) (s ×ˢ t) (x, y) :=
cont_diff_within_at.prod_map' hf hg
/-- The product map of two `C^n` functions on a set is `C^n` on the product set. -/
lemma cont_diff_on.prod_map {E' : Type*} [normed_group E'] [normed_space 𝕜 E']
{F' : Type*} [normed_group F'] [normed_space 𝕜 F']
{s : set E} {t : set E'} {f : E → F} {g : E' → F'}
(hf : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s) (hg : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n g t) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (prod.map f g) (s ×ˢ t) :=
(hf.comp cont_diff_on_fst (prod_subset_preimage_fst _ _)).prod
(hg.comp (cont_diff_on_snd) (prod_subset_preimage_snd _ _))
/-- The product map of two `C^n` functions within a set at a point is `C^n`
within the product set at the product point. -/
lemma cont_diff_at.prod_map {f : E → F} {g : E' → F'} {x : E} {y : E'}
(hf : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f x) (hg : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n g y) :
cont_diff_at 𝕜 n (prod.map f g) (x, y) :=
begin
rw cont_diff_at at *,
convert hf.prod_map hg,
simp only [univ_prod_univ]
end
/-- The product map of two `C^n` functions within a set at a point is `C^n`
within the product set at the product point. -/
lemma cont_diff_at.prod_map' {f : E → F} {g : E' → F'} {p : E × E'}
(hf : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f p.1) (hg : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n g p.2) :
cont_diff_at 𝕜 n (prod.map f g) p :=
begin
rcases p,
exact cont_diff_at.prod_map hf hg
end
/-- The product map of two `C^n` functions is `C^n`. -/
lemma cont_diff.prod_map {f : E → F} {g : E' → F'}
(hf : cont_diff 𝕜 n f) (hg : cont_diff 𝕜 n g) :
cont_diff 𝕜 n (prod.map f g) :=
begin
rw cont_diff_iff_cont_diff_at at *,
exact λ ⟨x, y⟩, (hf x).prod_map (hg y)
end
lemma cont_diff_prod_mk_left (f₀ : F) : cont_diff 𝕜 n (λ e : E, (e, f₀)) :=
cont_diff_id.prod cont_diff_const
lemma cont_diff_prod_mk_right (e₀ : E) : cont_diff 𝕜 n (λ f : F, (e₀, f)) :=
cont_diff_const.prod cont_diff_id
end prod_map
/-! ### Inversion in a complete normed algebra -/
section algebra_inverse
variables (𝕜) {R : Type*} [normed_ring R] [normed_algebra 𝕜 R]
open normed_ring continuous_linear_map ring
/-- In a complete normed algebra, the operation of inversion is `C^n`, for all `n`, at each
invertible element. The proof is by induction, bootstrapping using an identity expressing the
derivative of inversion as a bilinear map of inversion itself. -/
lemma cont_diff_at_ring_inverse [complete_space R] (x : Rˣ) :
cont_diff_at 𝕜 n ring.inverse (x : R) :=
begin
induction n using with_top.nat_induction with n IH Itop,
{ intros m hm,
refine ⟨{y : R | is_unit y}, _, _⟩,
{ simp [nhds_within_univ],
exact x.nhds },
{ use (ftaylor_series_within 𝕜 inverse univ),
rw [le_antisymm hm bot_le, has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on_zero_iff],
split,
{ rintros _ ⟨x', rfl⟩,
exact (inverse_continuous_at x').continuous_within_at },
{ simp [ftaylor_series_within] } } },
{ apply cont_diff_at_succ_iff_has_fderiv_at.mpr,
refine ⟨λ (x : R), - lmul_left_right 𝕜 R (inverse x) (inverse x), _, _⟩,
{ refine ⟨{y : R | is_unit y}, x.nhds, _⟩,
rintros _ ⟨y, rfl⟩,
rw [inverse_unit],
exact has_fderiv_at_ring_inverse y },
{ convert (lmul_left_right_is_bounded_bilinear 𝕜 R).cont_diff.neg.comp_cont_diff_at
(x : R) (IH.prod IH) } },
{ exact cont_diff_at_top.mpr Itop }
end
variables (𝕜) {𝕜' : Type*} [normed_field 𝕜'] [normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜'] [complete_space 𝕜']
lemma cont_diff_at_inv {x : 𝕜'} (hx : x ≠ 0) {n} :
cont_diff_at 𝕜 n has_inv.inv x :=
by simpa only [ring.inverse_eq_inv'] using cont_diff_at_ring_inverse 𝕜 (units.mk0 x hx)
lemma cont_diff_on_inv {n} : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (has_inv.inv : 𝕜' → 𝕜') {0}ᶜ :=
λ x hx, (cont_diff_at_inv 𝕜 hx).cont_diff_within_at
variable {𝕜}
-- TODO: the next few lemmas don't need `𝕜` or `𝕜'` to be complete
-- A good way to show this is to generalize `cont_diff_at_ring_inverse` to the setting
-- of a function `f` such that `∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x * f x = 1`.
lemma cont_diff_within_at.inv {f : E → 𝕜'} {n} (hf : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x)
(hx : f x ≠ 0) :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n (λ x, (f x)⁻¹) s x :=
(cont_diff_at_inv 𝕜 hx).comp_cont_diff_within_at x hf
lemma cont_diff_on.inv {f : E → 𝕜'} {n} (hf : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s)
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (λ x, (f x)⁻¹) s :=
λ x hx, (hf.cont_diff_within_at hx).inv (h x hx)
lemma cont_diff_at.inv {f : E → 𝕜'} {n} (hf : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
cont_diff_at 𝕜 n (λ x, (f x)⁻¹) x :=
hf.inv hx
lemma cont_diff.inv {f : E → 𝕜'} {n} (hf : cont_diff 𝕜 n f) (h : ∀ x, f x ≠ 0) :
cont_diff 𝕜 n (λ x, (f x)⁻¹) :=
by { rw cont_diff_iff_cont_diff_at, exact λ x, hf.cont_diff_at.inv (h x) }
-- TODO: generalize to `f g : E → 𝕜'`
lemma cont_diff_within_at.div [complete_space 𝕜] {f g : E → 𝕜} {n}
(hf : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x) (hg : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n g s x)
(hx : g x ≠ 0) :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n (λ x, f x / g x) s x :=
by simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using hf.mul (hg.inv hx)
lemma cont_diff_on.div [complete_space 𝕜] {f g : E → 𝕜} {n}
(hf : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s) (hg : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n g s) (h₀ : ∀ x ∈ s, g x ≠ 0) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (f / g) s :=
λ x hx, (hf x hx).div (hg x hx) (h₀ x hx)
lemma cont_diff_at.div [complete_space 𝕜] {f g : E → 𝕜} {n}
(hf : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f x) (hg : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n g x)
(hx : g x ≠ 0) :
cont_diff_at 𝕜 n (λ x, f x / g x) x :=
hf.div hg hx
lemma cont_diff.div [complete_space 𝕜] {f g : E → 𝕜} {n}
(hf : cont_diff 𝕜 n f) (hg : cont_diff 𝕜 n g)
(h0 : ∀ x, g x ≠ 0) :
cont_diff 𝕜 n (λ x, f x / g x) :=
begin
simp only [cont_diff_iff_cont_diff_at] at *,
exact λ x, (hf x).div (hg x) (h0 x)
end
end algebra_inverse
/-! ### Inversion of continuous linear maps between Banach spaces -/
section map_inverse
open continuous_linear_map
/-- At a continuous linear equivalence `e : E ≃L[𝕜] F` between Banach spaces, the operation of
inversion is `C^n`, for all `n`. -/
lemma cont_diff_at_map_inverse [complete_space E] (e : E ≃L[𝕜] F) :
cont_diff_at 𝕜 n inverse (e : E →L[𝕜] F) :=
begin
nontriviality E,
-- first, we use the lemma `to_ring_inverse` to rewrite in terms of `ring.inverse` in the ring
-- `E →L[𝕜] E`
let O₁ : (E →L[𝕜] E) → (F →L[𝕜] E) := λ f, f.comp (e.symm : (F →L[𝕜] E)),
let O₂ : (E →L[𝕜] F) → (E →L[𝕜] E) := λ f, (e.symm : (F →L[𝕜] E)).comp f,
have : continuous_linear_map.inverse = O₁ ∘ ring.inverse ∘ O₂ :=
funext (to_ring_inverse e),
rw this,
-- `O₁` and `O₂` are `cont_diff`,
-- so we reduce to proving that `ring.inverse` is `cont_diff`
have h₁ : cont_diff 𝕜 n O₁,
from is_bounded_bilinear_map_comp.cont_diff.comp
(cont_diff_const.prod cont_diff_id),
have h₂ : cont_diff 𝕜 n O₂,
from is_bounded_bilinear_map_comp.cont_diff.comp
(cont_diff_id.prod cont_diff_const),
refine h₁.cont_diff_at.comp _ (cont_diff_at.comp _ _ h₂.cont_diff_at),
convert cont_diff_at_ring_inverse 𝕜 (1 : (E →L[𝕜] E)ˣ),
simp [O₂, one_def]
end
end map_inverse
section function_inverse
open continuous_linear_map
/-- If `f` is a local homeomorphism and the point `a` is in its target,
and if `f` is `n` times continuously differentiable at `f.symm a`,
and if the derivative at `f.symm a` is a continuous linear equivalence,
then `f.symm` is `n` times continuously differentiable at the point `a`.
This is one of the easy parts of the inverse function theorem: it assumes that we already have
an inverse function. -/
theorem local_homeomorph.cont_diff_at_symm [complete_space E]
(f : local_homeomorph E F) {f₀' : E ≃L[𝕜] F} {a : F} (ha : a ∈ f.target)
(hf₀' : has_fderiv_at f (f₀' : E →L[𝕜] F) (f.symm a)) (hf : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f (f.symm a)) :
cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f.symm a :=
begin
-- We prove this by induction on `n`
induction n using with_top.nat_induction with n IH Itop,
{ rw cont_diff_at_zero,
exact ⟨f.target, is_open.mem_nhds f.open_target ha, f.continuous_inv_fun⟩ },
{ obtain ⟨f', ⟨u, hu, hff'⟩, hf'⟩ := cont_diff_at_succ_iff_has_fderiv_at.mp hf,
apply cont_diff_at_succ_iff_has_fderiv_at.mpr,
-- For showing `n.succ` times continuous differentiability (the main inductive step), it
-- suffices to produce the derivative and show that it is `n` times continuously differentiable
have eq_f₀' : f' (f.symm a) = f₀',
{ exact (hff' (f.symm a) (mem_of_mem_nhds hu)).unique hf₀' },
-- This follows by a bootstrapping formula expressing the derivative as a function of `f` itself
refine ⟨inverse ∘ f' ∘ f.symm, _, _⟩,
{ -- We first check that the derivative of `f` is that formula
have h_nhds : {y : E | ∃ (e : E ≃L[𝕜] F), ↑e = f' y} ∈ 𝓝 ((f.symm) a),
{ have hf₀' := f₀'.nhds,
rw ← eq_f₀' at hf₀',
exact hf'.continuous_at.preimage_mem_nhds hf₀' },
obtain ⟨t, htu, ht, htf⟩ := mem_nhds_iff.mp (filter.inter_mem hu h_nhds),
use f.target ∩ (f.symm) ⁻¹' t,
refine ⟨is_open.mem_nhds _ _, _⟩,
{ exact f.preimage_open_of_open_symm ht },
{ exact mem_inter ha (mem_preimage.mpr htf) },
intros x hx,
obtain ⟨hxu, e, he⟩ := htu hx.2,
have h_deriv : has_fderiv_at f ↑e ((f.symm) x),
{ rw he,
exact hff' (f.symm x) hxu },
convert f.has_fderiv_at_symm hx.1 h_deriv,
simp [← he] },
{ -- Then we check that the formula, being a composition of `cont_diff` pieces, is
-- itself `cont_diff`
have h_deriv₁ : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n inverse (f' (f.symm a)),
{ rw eq_f₀',
exact cont_diff_at_map_inverse _ },
have h_deriv₂ : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f.symm a,
{ refine IH (hf.of_le _),
norm_cast,
exact nat.le_succ n },
exact (h_deriv₁.comp _ hf').comp _ h_deriv₂ } },
{ refine cont_diff_at_top.mpr _,
intros n,
exact Itop n (cont_diff_at_top.mp hf n) }
end
/-- Let `f` be a local homeomorphism of a nondiscrete normed field, let `a` be a point in its
target. if `f` is `n` times continuously differentiable at `f.symm a`, and if the derivative at
`f.symm a` is nonzero, then `f.symm` is `n` times continuously differentiable at the point `a`.
This is one of the easy parts of the inverse function theorem: it assumes that we already have
an inverse function. -/
theorem local_homeomorph.cont_diff_at_symm_deriv [complete_space 𝕜]
(f : local_homeomorph 𝕜 𝕜) {f₀' a : 𝕜} (h₀ : f₀' ≠ 0) (ha : a ∈ f.target)
(hf₀' : has_deriv_at f f₀' (f.symm a)) (hf : cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f (f.symm a)) :
cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f.symm a :=
f.cont_diff_at_symm ha (hf₀'.has_fderiv_at_equiv h₀) hf
end function_inverse
/-! ### Finite dimensional results -/
section finite_dimensional
open function finite_dimensional
variables [complete_space 𝕜]
/-- A family of continuous linear maps is `C^n` on `s` if all its applications are. -/
lemma cont_diff_on_clm_apply {n : with_top ℕ} {f : E → F →L[𝕜] G}
{s : set E} [finite_dimensional 𝕜 F] :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s ↔ ∀ y, cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (λ x, f x y) s :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h y, (continuous_linear_map.apply 𝕜 G y).cont_diff.comp_cont_diff_on h, λ h, _⟩,
let d := finrank 𝕜 F,
have hd : d = finrank 𝕜 (fin d → 𝕜) := (finrank_fin_fun 𝕜).symm,
let e₁ := continuous_linear_equiv.of_finrank_eq hd,
let e₂ := (e₁.arrow_congr (1 : G ≃L[𝕜] G)).trans (continuous_linear_equiv.pi_ring (fin d)),
rw [← comp.left_id f, ← e₂.symm_comp_self],
exact e₂.symm.cont_diff.comp_cont_diff_on (cont_diff_on_pi.mpr (λ i, h _))
end
lemma cont_diff_clm_apply {n : with_top ℕ} {f : E → F →L[𝕜] G} [finite_dimensional 𝕜 F] :
cont_diff 𝕜 n f ↔ ∀ y, cont_diff 𝕜 n (λ x, f x y) :=
by simp_rw [← cont_diff_on_univ, cont_diff_on_clm_apply]
/-- This is a useful lemma to prove that a certain operation preserves functions being `C^n`.
When you do induction on `n`, this gives a useful characterization of a function being `C^(n+1)`,
assuming you have already computed the derivative. The advantage of this version over
`cont_diff_succ_iff_fderiv` is that both occurences of `cont_diff` are for functions with the same
domain and codomain (`E` and `F`). This is not the case for `cont_diff_succ_iff_fderiv`, which
often requires an inconvenient need to generalize `F`, which results in universe issues
(see the discussion in the section of `cont_diff.comp`).
This lemma avoids these universe issues, but only applies for finite dimensional `E`. -/
lemma cont_diff_succ_iff_fderiv_apply [finite_dimensional 𝕜 E] {n : ℕ} {f : E → F} :
cont_diff 𝕜 ((n + 1) : ℕ) f ↔
differentiable 𝕜 f ∧ ∀ y, cont_diff 𝕜 n (λ x, fderiv 𝕜 f x y) :=
by rw [cont_diff_succ_iff_fderiv, cont_diff_clm_apply]
lemma cont_diff_on_succ_of_fderiv_apply [finite_dimensional 𝕜 E] {n : ℕ} {f : E → F}
{s : set E} (hf : differentiable_on 𝕜 f s)
(h : ∀ y, cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (λ x, fderiv_within 𝕜 f s x y) s) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 ((n + 1) : ℕ) f s :=
cont_diff_on_succ_of_fderiv_within hf $ cont_diff_on_clm_apply.mpr h
lemma cont_diff_on_succ_iff_fderiv_apply [finite_dimensional 𝕜 E] {n : ℕ} {f : E → F}
{s : set E} (hs : unique_diff_on 𝕜 s) : cont_diff_on 𝕜 ((n + 1) : ℕ) f s ↔
differentiable_on 𝕜 f s ∧ ∀ y, cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (λ x, fderiv_within 𝕜 f s x y) s :=
by rw [cont_diff_on_succ_iff_fderiv_within hs, cont_diff_on_clm_apply]
end finite_dimensional
section real
/-!
### Results over `ℝ` or `ℂ`
The results in this section rely on the Mean Value Theorem, and therefore hold only over `ℝ` (and
its extension fields such as `ℂ`).
-/
variables
{𝕂 : Type*} [is_R_or_C 𝕂]
{E' : Type*} [normed_group E'] [normed_space 𝕂 E']
{F' : Type*} [normed_group F'] [normed_space 𝕂 F']
/-- If a function has a Taylor series at order at least 1, then at points in the interior of the
domain of definition, the term of order 1 of this series is a strict derivative of `f`. -/
lemma has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on.has_strict_fderiv_at
{s : set E'} {f : E' → F'} {x : E'} {p : E' → formal_multilinear_series 𝕂 E' F'}
(hf : has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on n f p s) (hn : 1 ≤ n) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
has_strict_fderiv_at f ((continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1 𝕂 E' F') (p x 1)) x :=
has_strict_fderiv_at_of_has_fderiv_at_of_continuous_at (hf.eventually_has_fderiv_at hn hs) $
(continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1 𝕂 E' F').continuous_at.comp $
(hf.cont 1 hn).continuous_at hs
/-- If a function is `C^n` with `1 ≤ n` around a point, and its derivative at that point is given to
us as `f'`, then `f'` is also a strict derivative. -/
lemma cont_diff_at.has_strict_fderiv_at'
{f : E' → F'} {f' : E' →L[𝕂] F'} {x : E'}
(hf : cont_diff_at 𝕂 n f x) (hf' : has_fderiv_at f f' x) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
has_strict_fderiv_at f f' x :=
begin
rcases hf 1 hn with ⟨u, H, p, hp⟩,
simp only [nhds_within_univ, mem_univ, insert_eq_of_mem] at H,
have := hp.has_strict_fderiv_at le_rfl H,
rwa hf'.unique this.has_fderiv_at
end
/-- If a function is `C^n` with `1 ≤ n` around a point, and its derivative at that point is given to
us as `f'`, then `f'` is also a strict derivative. -/
lemma cont_diff_at.has_strict_deriv_at' {f : 𝕂 → F'} {f' : F'} {x : 𝕂}
(hf : cont_diff_at 𝕂 n f x) (hf' : has_deriv_at f f' x) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
has_strict_deriv_at f f' x :=
hf.has_strict_fderiv_at' hf' hn
/-- If a function is `C^n` with `1 ≤ n` around a point, then the derivative of `f` at this point
is also a strict derivative. -/
lemma cont_diff_at.has_strict_fderiv_at {f : E' → F'} {x : E'}
(hf : cont_diff_at 𝕂 n f x) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
has_strict_fderiv_at f (fderiv 𝕂 f x) x :=
hf.has_strict_fderiv_at' (hf.differentiable_at hn).has_fderiv_at hn
/-- If a function is `C^n` with `1 ≤ n` around a point, then the derivative of `f` at this point
is also a strict derivative. -/
lemma cont_diff_at.has_strict_deriv_at {f : 𝕂 → F'} {x : 𝕂}
(hf : cont_diff_at 𝕂 n f x) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
has_strict_deriv_at f (deriv f x) x :=
(hf.has_strict_fderiv_at hn).has_strict_deriv_at
/-- If a function is `C^n` with `1 ≤ n`, then the derivative of `f` is also a strict derivative. -/
lemma cont_diff.has_strict_fderiv_at
{f : E' → F'} {x : E'} (hf : cont_diff 𝕂 n f) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
has_strict_fderiv_at f (fderiv 𝕂 f x) x :=
hf.cont_diff_at.has_strict_fderiv_at hn
/-- If a function is `C^n` with `1 ≤ n`, then the derivative of `f` is also a strict derivative. -/
lemma cont_diff.has_strict_deriv_at
{f : 𝕂 → F'} {x : 𝕂} (hf : cont_diff 𝕂 n f) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
has_strict_deriv_at f (deriv f x) x :=
hf.cont_diff_at.has_strict_deriv_at hn
/-- If `f` has a formal Taylor series `p` up to order `1` on `{x} ∪ s`, where `s` is a convex set,
and `∥p x 1∥₊ < K`, then `f` is `K`-Lipschitz in a neighborhood of `x` within `s`. -/
lemma has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on.exists_lipschitz_on_with_of_nnnorm_lt {E F : Type*}
[normed_group E] [normed_space ℝ E] [normed_group F] [normed_space ℝ F] {f : E → F}
{p : E → formal_multilinear_series ℝ E F} {s : set E} {x : E}
(hf : has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on 1 f p (insert x s)) (hs : convex ℝ s) (K : ℝ≥0)
(hK : ∥p x 1∥₊ < K) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, lipschitz_on_with K f t :=
begin
set f' := λ y, continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1 ℝ E F (p y 1),
have hder : ∀ y ∈ s, has_fderiv_within_at f (f' y) s y,
from λ y hy, (hf.has_fderiv_within_at le_rfl (subset_insert x s hy)).mono (subset_insert x s),
have hcont : continuous_within_at f' s x,
from (continuous_multilinear_curry_fin1 ℝ E F).continuous_at.comp_continuous_within_at
((hf.cont _ le_rfl _ (mem_insert _ _)).mono (subset_insert x s)),
replace hK : ∥f' x∥₊ < K, by simpa only [linear_isometry_equiv.nnnorm_map],
exact hs.exists_nhds_within_lipschitz_on_with_of_has_fderiv_within_at_of_nnnorm_lt
(eventually_nhds_within_iff.2 $ eventually_of_forall hder) hcont K hK
end
/-- If `f` has a formal Taylor series `p` up to order `1` on `{x} ∪ s`, where `s` is a convex set,
then `f` is Lipschitz in a neighborhood of `x` within `s`. -/
lemma has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on.exists_lipschitz_on_with {E F : Type*}
[normed_group E] [normed_space ℝ E] [normed_group F] [normed_space ℝ F] {f : E → F}
{p : E → formal_multilinear_series ℝ E F} {s : set E} {x : E}
(hf : has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on 1 f p (insert x s)) (hs : convex ℝ s) :
∃ K (t ∈ 𝓝[s] x), lipschitz_on_with K f t :=
(exists_gt _).imp $ hf.exists_lipschitz_on_with_of_nnnorm_lt hs
/-- If `f` is `C^1` within a conves set `s` at `x`, then it is Lipschitz on a neighborhood of `x`
within `s`. -/
lemma cont_diff_within_at.exists_lipschitz_on_with {E F : Type*} [normed_group E]
[normed_space ℝ E] [normed_group F] [normed_space ℝ F] {f : E → F} {s : set E}
{x : E} (hf : cont_diff_within_at ℝ 1 f s x) (hs : convex ℝ s) :
∃ (K : ℝ≥0) (t ∈ 𝓝[s] x), lipschitz_on_with K f t :=
begin
rcases hf 1 le_rfl with ⟨t, hst, p, hp⟩,
rcases metric.mem_nhds_within_iff.mp hst with ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩,
replace hp : has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on 1 f p (metric.ball x ε ∩ insert x s) := hp.mono hε,
clear hst hε t,
rw [← insert_eq_of_mem (metric.mem_ball_self ε0), ← insert_inter_distrib] at hp,
rcases hp.exists_lipschitz_on_with ((convex_ball _ _).inter hs) with ⟨K, t, hst, hft⟩,
rw [inter_comm, ← nhds_within_restrict' _ (metric.ball_mem_nhds _ ε0)] at hst,
exact ⟨K, t, hst, hft⟩
end
/-- If `f` is `C^1` at `x` and `K > ∥fderiv 𝕂 f x∥`, then `f` is `K`-Lipschitz in a neighborhood of
`x`. -/
lemma cont_diff_at.exists_lipschitz_on_with_of_nnnorm_lt {f : E' → F'} {x : E'}
(hf : cont_diff_at 𝕂 1 f x) (K : ℝ≥0) (hK : ∥fderiv 𝕂 f x∥₊ < K) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓝 x, lipschitz_on_with K f t :=
(hf.has_strict_fderiv_at le_rfl).exists_lipschitz_on_with_of_nnnorm_lt K hK
/-- If `f` is `C^1` at `x`, then `f` is Lipschitz in a neighborhood of `x`. -/
lemma cont_diff_at.exists_lipschitz_on_with {f : E' → F'} {x : E'}
(hf : cont_diff_at 𝕂 1 f x) :
∃ K (t ∈ 𝓝 x), lipschitz_on_with K f t :=
(hf.has_strict_fderiv_at le_rfl).exists_lipschitz_on_with
end real
section deriv
/-!
### One dimension
All results up to now have been expressed in terms of the general Fréchet derivative `fderiv`. For
maps defined on the field, the one-dimensional derivative `deriv` is often easier to use. In this
paragraph, we reformulate some higher smoothness results in terms of `deriv`.
-/
variables {f₂ : 𝕜 → F} {s₂ : set 𝕜}
open continuous_linear_map (smul_right)
/-- A function is `C^(n + 1)` on a domain with unique derivatives if and only if it is
differentiable there, and its derivative (formulated with `deriv_within`) is `C^n`. -/
theorem cont_diff_on_succ_iff_deriv_within {n : ℕ} (hs : unique_diff_on 𝕜 s₂) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 ((n + 1) : ℕ) f₂ s₂ ↔
differentiable_on 𝕜 f₂ s₂ ∧ cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (deriv_within f₂ s₂) s₂ :=
begin
rw cont_diff_on_succ_iff_fderiv_within hs,
congr' 2,
apply le_antisymm,
{ assume h,
have : deriv_within f₂ s₂ = (λ u : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] F, u 1) ∘ (fderiv_within 𝕜 f₂ s₂),
by { ext x, refl },
simp only [this],
apply cont_diff.comp_cont_diff_on _ h,
exact (is_bounded_bilinear_map_apply.is_bounded_linear_map_left _).cont_diff },
{ assume h,
have : fderiv_within 𝕜 f₂ s₂ = smul_right (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) ∘ deriv_within f₂ s₂,
by { ext x, simp [deriv_within] },
simp only [this],
apply cont_diff.comp_cont_diff_on _ h,
have : is_bounded_bilinear_map 𝕜 (λ _ : (𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) × F, _) :=
is_bounded_bilinear_map_smul_right,
exact (this.is_bounded_linear_map_right _).cont_diff }
end
/-- A function is `C^(n + 1)` on an open domain if and only if it is
differentiable there, and its derivative (formulated with `deriv`) is `C^n`. -/
theorem cont_diff_on_succ_iff_deriv_of_open {n : ℕ} (hs : is_open s₂) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 ((n + 1) : ℕ) f₂ s₂ ↔
differentiable_on 𝕜 f₂ s₂ ∧ cont_diff_on 𝕜 n (deriv f₂) s₂ :=
begin
rw cont_diff_on_succ_iff_deriv_within hs.unique_diff_on,
congr' 2,
rw ← iff_iff_eq,
apply cont_diff_on_congr,
assume x hx,
exact deriv_within_of_open hs hx
end
/-- A function is `C^∞` on a domain with unique derivatives if and only if it is differentiable
there, and its derivative (formulated with `deriv_within`) is `C^∞`. -/
theorem cont_diff_on_top_iff_deriv_within (hs : unique_diff_on 𝕜 s₂) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 ∞ f₂ s₂ ↔
differentiable_on 𝕜 f₂ s₂ ∧ cont_diff_on 𝕜 ∞ (deriv_within f₂ s₂) s₂ :=
begin
split,
{ assume h,
refine ⟨h.differentiable_on le_top, _⟩,
apply cont_diff_on_top.2 (λ n, ((cont_diff_on_succ_iff_deriv_within hs).1 _).2),
exact h.of_le le_top },
{ assume h,
refine cont_diff_on_top.2 (λ n, _),
have A : (n : with_top ℕ) ≤ ∞ := le_top,
apply ((cont_diff_on_succ_iff_deriv_within hs).2 ⟨h.1, h.2.of_le A⟩).of_le,
exact with_top.coe_le_coe.2 (nat.le_succ n) }
end
/-- A function is `C^∞` on an open domain if and only if it is differentiable
there, and its derivative (formulated with `deriv`) is `C^∞`. -/
theorem cont_diff_on_top_iff_deriv_of_open (hs : is_open s₂) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 ∞ f₂ s₂ ↔
differentiable_on 𝕜 f₂ s₂ ∧ cont_diff_on 𝕜 ∞ (deriv f₂) s₂ :=
begin
rw cont_diff_on_top_iff_deriv_within hs.unique_diff_on,
congr' 2,
rw ← iff_iff_eq,
apply cont_diff_on_congr,
assume x hx,
exact deriv_within_of_open hs hx
end
lemma cont_diff_on.deriv_within
(hf : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f₂ s₂) (hs : unique_diff_on 𝕜 s₂) (hmn : m + 1 ≤ n) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 m (deriv_within f₂ s₂) s₂ :=
begin
cases m,
{ change ∞ + 1 ≤ n at hmn,
have : n = ∞, by simpa using hmn,
rw this at hf,
exact ((cont_diff_on_top_iff_deriv_within hs).1 hf).2 },
{ change (m.succ : with_top ℕ) ≤ n at hmn,
exact ((cont_diff_on_succ_iff_deriv_within hs).1 (hf.of_le hmn)).2 }
end
lemma cont_diff_on.deriv_of_open
(hf : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f₂ s₂) (hs : is_open s₂) (hmn : m + 1 ≤ n) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 m (deriv f₂) s₂ :=
(hf.deriv_within hs.unique_diff_on hmn).congr (λ x hx, (deriv_within_of_open hs hx).symm)
lemma cont_diff_on.continuous_on_deriv_within
(h : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f₂ s₂) (hs : unique_diff_on 𝕜 s₂) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
continuous_on (deriv_within f₂ s₂) s₂ :=
((cont_diff_on_succ_iff_deriv_within hs).1 (h.of_le hn)).2.continuous_on
lemma cont_diff_on.continuous_on_deriv_of_open
(h : cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f₂ s₂) (hs : is_open s₂) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
continuous_on (deriv f₂) s₂ :=
((cont_diff_on_succ_iff_deriv_of_open hs).1 (h.of_le hn)).2.continuous_on
/-- A function is `C^(n + 1)` if and only if it is differentiable,
and its derivative (formulated in terms of `deriv`) is `C^n`. -/
theorem cont_diff_succ_iff_deriv {n : ℕ} :
cont_diff 𝕜 ((n + 1) : ℕ) f₂ ↔
differentiable 𝕜 f₂ ∧ cont_diff 𝕜 n (deriv f₂) :=
by simp only [← cont_diff_on_univ, cont_diff_on_succ_iff_deriv_of_open, is_open_univ,
differentiable_on_univ]
theorem cont_diff_one_iff_deriv :
cont_diff 𝕜 1 f₂ ↔ differentiable 𝕜 f₂ ∧ continuous (deriv f₂) :=
cont_diff_succ_iff_deriv.trans $ iff.rfl.and cont_diff_zero
/-- A function is `C^∞` if and only if it is differentiable,
and its derivative (formulated in terms of `deriv`) is `C^∞`. -/
theorem cont_diff_top_iff_deriv :
cont_diff 𝕜 ∞ f₂ ↔
differentiable 𝕜 f₂ ∧ cont_diff 𝕜 ∞ (deriv f₂) :=
begin
simp [cont_diff_on_univ.symm, differentiable_on_univ.symm, deriv_within_univ.symm,
- deriv_within_univ],
rw cont_diff_on_top_iff_deriv_within unique_diff_on_univ,
end
lemma cont_diff.continuous_deriv (h : cont_diff 𝕜 n f₂) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
continuous (deriv f₂) :=
(cont_diff_succ_iff_deriv.mp (h.of_le hn)).2.continuous
end deriv
section restrict_scalars
/-!
### Restricting from `ℂ` to `ℝ`, or generally from `𝕜'` to `𝕜`
If a function is `n` times continuously differentiable over `ℂ`, then it is `n` times continuously
differentiable over `ℝ`. In this paragraph, we give variants of this statement, in the general
situation where `ℂ` and `ℝ` are replaced respectively by `𝕜'` and `𝕜` where `𝕜'` is a normed algebra
over `𝕜`.
-/
variables (𝕜) {𝕜' : Type*} [nondiscrete_normed_field 𝕜'] [normed_algebra 𝕜 𝕜']
variables [normed_space 𝕜' E] [is_scalar_tower 𝕜 𝕜' E]
variables [normed_space 𝕜' F] [is_scalar_tower 𝕜 𝕜' F]
variables {p' : E → formal_multilinear_series 𝕜' E F}
lemma has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on.restrict_scalars
(h : has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on n f p' s) :
has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on n f (λ x, (p' x).restrict_scalars 𝕜) s :=
{ zero_eq := λ x hx, h.zero_eq x hx,
fderiv_within :=
begin
intros m hm x hx,
convert ((continuous_multilinear_map.restrict_scalars_linear 𝕜).has_fderiv_at)
.comp_has_fderiv_within_at _ ((h.fderiv_within m hm x hx).restrict_scalars 𝕜),
end,
cont := λ m hm, continuous_multilinear_map.continuous_restrict_scalars.comp_continuous_on
(h.cont m hm) }
lemma cont_diff_within_at.restrict_scalars (h : cont_diff_within_at 𝕜' n f s x) :
cont_diff_within_at 𝕜 n f s x :=
begin
intros m hm,
rcases h m hm with ⟨u, u_mem, p', hp'⟩,
exact ⟨u, u_mem, _, hp'.restrict_scalars _⟩
end
lemma cont_diff_on.restrict_scalars (h : cont_diff_on 𝕜' n f s) :
cont_diff_on 𝕜 n f s :=
λ x hx, (h x hx).restrict_scalars _
lemma cont_diff_at.restrict_scalars (h : cont_diff_at 𝕜' n f x) :
cont_diff_at 𝕜 n f x :=
cont_diff_within_at_univ.1 $ h.cont_diff_within_at.restrict_scalars _
lemma cont_diff.restrict_scalars (h : cont_diff 𝕜' n f) :
cont_diff 𝕜 n f :=
cont_diff_iff_cont_diff_at.2 $ λ x, h.cont_diff_at.restrict_scalars _
end restrict_scalars
|
c47ce3c3f28e2ac755e7fd65c6cb89a7e5c1e7ba | c3f2fcd060adfa2ca29f924839d2d925e8f2c685 | /library/logic/axioms/prop_complete.lean | cce9392c9ba43b78f36601fb688e55fd5d419df9 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | respu/lean | 6582d19a2f2838a28ecd2b3c6f81c32d07b5341d | 8c76419c60b63d0d9f7bc04ebb0b99812d0ec654 | refs/heads/master | 1,610,882,451,231 | 1,427,747,084,000 | 1,427,747,429,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,246 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Module: logic.axioms.classical
Author: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import logic.connectives logic.quantifiers logic.cast algebra.relation
open eq.ops
axiom prop_complete (a : Prop) : a = true ∨ a = false
definition eq_true_or_eq_false := prop_complete
theorem cases_true_false (P : Prop → Prop) (H1 : P true) (H2 : P false) (a : Prop) : P a :=
or.elim (prop_complete a)
(assume Ht : a = true, Ht⁻¹ ▸ H1)
(assume Hf : a = false, Hf⁻¹ ▸ H2)
theorem cases_on (a : Prop) {P : Prop → Prop} (H1 : P true) (H2 : P false) : P a :=
cases_true_false P H1 H2 a
-- this supercedes the em in decidable
theorem em (a : Prop) : a ∨ ¬a :=
or.elim (prop_complete a)
(assume Ht : a = true, or.inl (of_eq_true Ht))
(assume Hf : a = false, or.inr (not_of_eq_false Hf))
-- this supercedes by_cases in decidable
definition by_cases {p q : Prop} (Hpq : p → q) (Hnpq : ¬p → q) : q :=
or.elim (em p) (assume Hp, Hpq Hp) (assume Hnp, Hnpq Hnp)
-- this supercedes by_contradiction in decidable
theorem by_contradiction {p : Prop} (H : ¬p → false) : p :=
by_cases
(assume H1 : p, H1)
(assume H1 : ¬p, false.rec _ (H H1))
theorem eq_false_or_eq_true (a : Prop) : a = false ∨ a = true :=
cases_true_false (λ x, x = false ∨ x = true)
(or.inr rfl)
(or.inl rfl)
a
theorem propext {a b : Prop} (Hab : a → b) (Hba : b → a) : a = b :=
or.elim (prop_complete a)
(assume Hat, or.elim (prop_complete b)
(assume Hbt, Hat ⬝ Hbt⁻¹)
(assume Hbf, false.elim (Hbf ▸ (Hab (of_eq_true Hat)))))
(assume Haf, or.elim (prop_complete b)
(assume Hbt, false.elim (Haf ▸ (Hba (of_eq_true Hbt))))
(assume Hbf, Haf ⬝ Hbf⁻¹))
theorem eq.of_iff {a b : Prop} (H : a ↔ b) : a = b :=
iff.elim (assume H1 H2, propext H1 H2) H
theorem iff_eq_eq {a b : Prop} : (a ↔ b) = (a = b) :=
propext
(assume H, eq.of_iff H)
(assume H, iff.of_eq H)
open relation
theorem iff_congruence [instance] (P : Prop → Prop) : is_congruence iff iff P :=
is_congruence.mk
(take (a b : Prop),
assume H : a ↔ b,
show P a ↔ P b, from iff.of_eq (eq.of_iff H ▸ eq.refl (P a)))
|
a6a452dd080240d69cfb04d680433cb300b24688 | e8d53a7b78545d183a23dd7bd921bc7ff312989f | /imp_prop_trunc.hlean | e242e43ce1261f9ab5b28a731bfe6828af51c141 | [] | no_license | Sumit0730/Impredicative | 857007626592440a27cf4440aa9a226d0ede7f3e | a75cb9989a684133d31d4889a746ee4fa7b66cea | refs/heads/master | 1,631,994,804,745 | 1,531,980,761,000 | 1,531,980,761,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,951 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Jakob von Raumer. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jakob von Raumer, Floris van Doorn
Proof of the theorem that (is_trunc n A) is a mere proposition
We prove this here to avoid circular dependency of files
We want to use this in .equiv; .equiv is imported by .function and .function is imported by .trunc
-/
import types.pi
open equiv sigma sigma.ops eq function pi
namespace is_trunc
definition is_contr.sigma_char (A : Type) :
(Σ (center : A), Π (a : A), center = a) ≃ (is_contr A) :=
begin
fapply equiv.MK,
{ intro S, exact (is_contr.mk S.1 S.2)},
{ intro H, cases H with H', cases H' with ce co, exact ⟨ce, co⟩},
{ intro H, cases H with H', cases H' with ce co, exact idp},
{ intro S, cases S, apply idp}
end
definition is_trunc.pi_char (n : trunc_index) (A : Type) :
(Π (x y : A), is_trunc n (x = y)) ≃ (is_trunc (n .+1) A) :=
begin
fapply equiv.MK,
{ intro H, apply is_trunc_succ_intro},
{ intro H x y, apply is_trunc_eq},
{ intro H, cases H, apply idp},
{ intro P, apply eq_of_homotopy, intro a, apply eq_of_homotopy, intro b,
change is_trunc.mk (to_internal n (a = b)) = P a b,
induction (P a b), apply idp},
end
definition is_prop_is_trunc (n : trunc_index) :
Π (A : Type), is_prop (is_trunc n A) :=
begin
induction n,
{ intro A,
apply is_trunc_is_equiv_closed,
{ apply equiv.to_is_equiv, apply is_contr.sigma_char},
apply is_prop.mk, intros,
fapply sigma_eq, apply x.2,
apply is_prop.elimo},
{ intro A,
apply is_trunc_is_equiv_closed,
apply equiv.to_is_equiv,
apply is_trunc.pi_char},
end
local attribute is_prop_is_trunc [instance]
definition is_trunc_succ_is_trunc [instance] (n m : ℕ₋₂) (A : Type) :
is_trunc (n.+1) (is_trunc m A) :=
!is_trunc_succ_of_is_prop
end is_trunc
|
7f363cbc0ef537d34e246f160a730e0884592f57 | c3f2fcd060adfa2ca29f924839d2d925e8f2c685 | /tests/lean/run/tactic3.lean | 6ecc69c0354bf42b16c837fb101d6cf429c5c1c8 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | respu/lean | 6582d19a2f2838a28ecd2b3c6f81c32d07b5341d | 8c76419c60b63d0d9f7bc04ebb0b99812d0ec654 | refs/heads/master | 1,610,882,451,231 | 1,427,747,084,000 | 1,427,747,429,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 193 | lean | import logic
open tactic
theorem tst {A B : Prop} (H1 : A) (H2 : B) : A
:= by [trace "first"; state; now |
trace "second"; state; fail |
trace "third"; assumption]
check tst
|
3ad4d9f807f38d32fc84ab79e9bb9e1844c9ea2f | 88fb7558b0636ec6b181f2a548ac11ad3919f8a5 | /tests/lean/run/cc1.lean | 2df4edfd8718cbdfd84bd974ce5e23a859817cf3 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | moritayasuaki/lean | 9f666c323cb6fa1f31ac597d777914aed41e3b7a | ae96ebf6ee953088c235ff7ae0e8c95066ba8001 | refs/heads/master | 1,611,135,440,814 | 1,493,852,869,000 | 1,493,852,869,000 | 90,269,903 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,493,906,291,000 | 1,493,906,291,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,142 | lean | open tactic
set_option pp.implicit true
example (a b c d : nat) (f : nat → nat → nat) : a = b → b = c → d + (if b > 0 then a else b) = 0 → f (b + b) b ≠ f (a + c) c → false :=
by do intros,
s ← cc_state.mk_using_hs,
trace s,
t₁ ← to_expr `(f (b + b) b),
t₂ ← to_expr `(f (a + c) c),
b ← to_expr `(b),
d ← to_expr `(d),
guard (s^.inconsistent),
guard (s^.eqc_size b = 4),
guard (not (s^.in_singlenton_eqc b)),
guard (s^.in_singlenton_eqc d),
trace ">>> Equivalence roots",
trace s^.roots,
trace ">>> b's equivalence class",
trace (s^.eqc_of b),
pr ← s^.eqv_proof t₁ t₂,
note `h pr,
contradiction
example (a b : nat) (f : nat → nat) : a = b → f a = f b :=
by cc
example (a b : nat) (f : nat → nat) : a = b → f a ≠ f b → false :=
by cc
example (a b : nat) (f : nat → nat) : a = b → f (f a) ≠ f (f b) → false :=
by cc
example (a b c : nat) (f : nat → nat) : a = b → c = b → f (f a) ≠ f (f c) → false :=
by cc
example (a b c : nat) (f : nat → nat → nat) : a = b → c = b → f (f a b) a ≠ f (f c c) c → false :=
by cc
example (a b c : nat) (f : nat → nat → nat) : a = b → c = b → f (f a b) a = f (f c c) c :=
by cc
example (a b c d : nat) : a == b → b = c → c == d → a == d :=
by cc
example (a b c d : nat) : a = b → b = c → c == d → a == d :=
by cc
example (a b c d : nat) : a = b → b == c → c == d → a == d :=
by cc
example (a b c d : nat) : a == b → b == c → c = d → a == d :=
by cc
example (a b c d : nat) : a == b → b = c → c = d → a == d :=
by cc
example (a b c d : nat) : a = b → b = c → c = d → a == d :=
by cc
example (a b c d : nat) : a = b → b == c → c = d → a == d :=
by cc
constant f {α : Type} : α → α → α
constant g : nat → nat
example (a b c : nat) : a = b → g a == g b :=
by cc
example (a b c : nat) : a = b → c = b → f (f a b) (g c) = f (f c a) (g b) :=
by cc
example (a b c d e x y : nat) : a = b → a = x → b = y → c = d → c = e → c = b → a = e :=
by cc
|
f34de66a00409887a46395119e41cf40dfbc45ed | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/order/bounded.lean | 4c29d5138dae00fe6d15e9649eb3688aa3e01edd | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,070 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Violeta Hernández Palacios. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import order.min_max
import order.rel_classes
import data.set.intervals.basic
/-!
# Bounded and unbounded sets
We prove miscellaneous lemmas about bounded and unbounded sets. Many of these are just variations on
the same ideas, or similar results with a few minor differences. The file is divided into these
different general ideas.
-/
namespace set
variables {α : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop} {s t : set α}
/-! ### Subsets of bounded and unbounded sets -/
theorem bounded.mono (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : bounded r t) : bounded r s :=
hs.imp $ λ a ha b hb, ha b (hst hb)
theorem unbounded.mono (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : unbounded r s) : unbounded r t :=
λ a, let ⟨b, hb, hb'⟩ := hs a in ⟨b, hst hb, hb'⟩
/-! ### Alternate characterizations of unboundedness on orders -/
lemma unbounded_le_of_forall_exists_lt [preorder α] (h : ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ s, a < b) : unbounded (≤) s :=
λ a, let ⟨b, hb, hb'⟩ := h a in ⟨b, hb, λ hba, hba.not_lt hb'⟩
lemma unbounded_le_iff [linear_order α] : unbounded (≤) s ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ s, a < b :=
by simp only [unbounded, not_le]
lemma unbounded_lt_of_forall_exists_le [preorder α] (h : ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ s, a ≤ b) : unbounded (<) s :=
λ a, let ⟨b, hb, hb'⟩ := h a in ⟨b, hb, λ hba, hba.not_le hb'⟩
lemma unbounded_lt_iff [linear_order α] : unbounded (<) s ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ s, a ≤ b :=
by simp only [unbounded, not_lt]
lemma unbounded_ge_of_forall_exists_gt [preorder α] (h : ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ s, b < a) : unbounded (≥) s :=
@unbounded_le_of_forall_exists_lt αᵒᵈ _ _ h
lemma unbounded_ge_iff [linear_order α] : unbounded (≥) s ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ s, b < a :=
⟨λ h a, let ⟨b, hb, hba⟩ := h a in ⟨b, hb, lt_of_not_ge hba⟩, unbounded_ge_of_forall_exists_gt⟩
lemma unbounded_gt_of_forall_exists_ge [preorder α] (h : ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ s, b ≤ a) : unbounded (>) s :=
λ a, let ⟨b, hb, hb'⟩ := h a in ⟨b, hb, λ hba, not_le_of_gt hba hb'⟩
lemma unbounded_gt_iff [linear_order α] : unbounded (>) s ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ s, b ≤ a :=
⟨λ h a, let ⟨b, hb, hba⟩ := h a in ⟨b, hb, le_of_not_gt hba⟩, unbounded_gt_of_forall_exists_ge⟩
/-! ### Relation between boundedness by strict and nonstrict orders. -/
/-! #### Less and less or equal -/
lemma bounded.rel_mono {r' : α → α → Prop} (h : bounded r s) (hrr' : r ≤ r') : bounded r' s :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := h in ⟨a, λ b hb, hrr' b a (ha b hb)⟩
lemma bounded_le_of_bounded_lt [preorder α] (h : bounded (<) s) : bounded (≤) s :=
h.rel_mono $ λ _ _, le_of_lt
lemma unbounded.rel_mono {r' : α → α → Prop} (hr : r' ≤ r) (h : unbounded r s) : unbounded r' s :=
λ a, let ⟨b, hb, hba⟩ := h a in ⟨b, hb, λ hba', hba (hr b a hba')⟩
lemma unbounded_lt_of_unbounded_le [preorder α] (h : unbounded (≤) s) :
unbounded (<) s :=
h.rel_mono $ λ _ _, le_of_lt
lemma bounded_le_iff_bounded_lt [preorder α] [no_max_order α] : bounded (≤) s ↔ bounded (<) s :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, bounded_le_of_bounded_lt⟩,
cases h with a ha,
cases exists_gt a with b hb,
exact ⟨b, λ c hc, lt_of_le_of_lt (ha c hc) hb⟩
end
lemma unbounded_lt_iff_unbounded_le [preorder α] [no_max_order α] :
unbounded (<) s ↔ unbounded (≤) s :=
by simp_rw [← not_bounded_iff, bounded_le_iff_bounded_lt]
/-! #### Greater and greater or equal -/
lemma bounded_ge_of_bounded_gt [preorder α] (h : bounded (>) s) : bounded (≥) s :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := h in ⟨a, λ b hb, le_of_lt (ha b hb)⟩
lemma unbounded_gt_of_unbounded_ge [preorder α] (h : unbounded (≥) s) : unbounded (>) s :=
λ a, let ⟨b, hb, hba⟩ := h a in ⟨b, hb, λ hba', hba (le_of_lt hba')⟩
lemma bounded_ge_iff_bounded_gt [preorder α] [no_min_order α] : bounded (≥) s ↔ bounded (>) s :=
@bounded_le_iff_bounded_lt αᵒᵈ _ _ _
lemma unbounded_gt_iff_unbounded_ge [preorder α] [no_min_order α] :
unbounded (>) s ↔ unbounded (≥) s :=
@unbounded_lt_iff_unbounded_le αᵒᵈ _ _ _
/-! ### The universal set -/
theorem unbounded_le_univ [has_le α] [no_top_order α] : unbounded (≤) (@set.univ α) :=
λ a, let ⟨b, hb⟩ := exists_not_le a in ⟨b, ⟨⟩, hb⟩
theorem unbounded_lt_univ [preorder α] [no_top_order α] : unbounded (<) (@set.univ α) :=
unbounded_lt_of_unbounded_le unbounded_le_univ
theorem unbounded_ge_univ [has_le α] [no_bot_order α] : unbounded (≥) (@set.univ α) :=
λ a, let ⟨b, hb⟩ := exists_not_ge a in ⟨b, ⟨⟩, hb⟩
theorem unbounded_gt_univ [preorder α] [no_bot_order α] : unbounded (>) (@set.univ α) :=
unbounded_gt_of_unbounded_ge unbounded_ge_univ
/-! ### Bounded and unbounded intervals -/
theorem bounded_self (a : α) : bounded r {b | r b a} :=
⟨a, λ x, id⟩
/-! #### Half-open bounded intervals -/
theorem bounded_lt_Iio [preorder α] (a : α) : bounded (<) (set.Iio a) :=
bounded_self a
theorem bounded_le_Iio [preorder α] (a : α) : bounded (≤) (set.Iio a) :=
bounded_le_of_bounded_lt (bounded_lt_Iio a)
theorem bounded_le_Iic [preorder α] (a : α) : bounded (≤) (set.Iic a) :=
bounded_self a
theorem bounded_lt_Iic [preorder α] [no_max_order α] (a : α) : bounded (<) (set.Iic a) :=
by simp only [← bounded_le_iff_bounded_lt, bounded_le_Iic]
theorem bounded_gt_Ioi [preorder α] (a : α) : bounded (>) (set.Ioi a) :=
bounded_self a
theorem bounded_ge_Ioi [preorder α] (a : α) : bounded (≥) (set.Ioi a) :=
bounded_ge_of_bounded_gt (bounded_gt_Ioi a)
theorem bounded_ge_Ici [preorder α] (a : α) : bounded (≥) (set.Ici a) :=
bounded_self a
theorem bounded_gt_Ici [preorder α] [no_min_order α] (a : α) : bounded (>) (set.Ici a) :=
by simp only [← bounded_ge_iff_bounded_gt, bounded_ge_Ici]
/-! #### Other bounded intervals -/
theorem bounded_lt_Ioo [preorder α] (a b : α) : bounded (<) (set.Ioo a b) :=
(bounded_lt_Iio b).mono set.Ioo_subset_Iio_self
theorem bounded_lt_Ico [preorder α] (a b : α) : bounded (<) (set.Ico a b) :=
(bounded_lt_Iio b).mono set.Ico_subset_Iio_self
theorem bounded_lt_Ioc [preorder α] [no_max_order α] (a b : α) : bounded (<) (set.Ioc a b) :=
(bounded_lt_Iic b).mono set.Ioc_subset_Iic_self
theorem bounded_lt_Icc [preorder α] [no_max_order α] (a b : α) : bounded (<) (set.Icc a b) :=
(bounded_lt_Iic b).mono set.Icc_subset_Iic_self
theorem bounded_le_Ioo [preorder α] (a b : α) : bounded (≤) (set.Ioo a b) :=
(bounded_le_Iio b).mono set.Ioo_subset_Iio_self
theorem bounded_le_Ico [preorder α] (a b : α) : bounded (≤) (set.Ico a b) :=
(bounded_le_Iio b).mono set.Ico_subset_Iio_self
theorem bounded_le_Ioc [preorder α] (a b : α) : bounded (≤) (set.Ioc a b) :=
(bounded_le_Iic b).mono set.Ioc_subset_Iic_self
theorem bounded_le_Icc [preorder α] (a b : α) : bounded (≤) (set.Icc a b) :=
(bounded_le_Iic b).mono set.Icc_subset_Iic_self
theorem bounded_gt_Ioo [preorder α] (a b : α) : bounded (>) (set.Ioo a b) :=
(bounded_gt_Ioi a).mono set.Ioo_subset_Ioi_self
theorem bounded_gt_Ioc [preorder α] (a b : α) : bounded (>) (set.Ioc a b) :=
(bounded_gt_Ioi a).mono set.Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
theorem bounded_gt_Ico [preorder α] [no_min_order α] (a b : α) : bounded (>) (set.Ico a b) :=
(bounded_gt_Ici a).mono set.Ico_subset_Ici_self
theorem bounded_gt_Icc [preorder α] [no_min_order α] (a b : α) : bounded (>) (set.Icc a b) :=
(bounded_gt_Ici a).mono set.Icc_subset_Ici_self
theorem bounded_ge_Ioo [preorder α] (a b : α) : bounded (≥) (set.Ioo a b) :=
(bounded_ge_Ioi a).mono set.Ioo_subset_Ioi_self
theorem bounded_ge_Ioc [preorder α] (a b : α) : bounded (≥) (set.Ioc a b) :=
(bounded_ge_Ioi a).mono set.Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
theorem bounded_ge_Ico [preorder α] (a b : α) : bounded (≥) (set.Ico a b) :=
(bounded_ge_Ici a).mono set.Ico_subset_Ici_self
theorem bounded_ge_Icc [preorder α] (a b : α) : bounded (≥) (set.Icc a b) :=
(bounded_ge_Ici a).mono set.Icc_subset_Ici_self
/-! #### Unbounded intervals -/
theorem unbounded_le_Ioi [semilattice_sup α] [no_max_order α] (a : α) : unbounded (≤) (set.Ioi a) :=
λ b, let ⟨c, hc⟩ := exists_gt (a ⊔ b) in
⟨c, le_sup_left.trans_lt hc, (le_sup_right.trans_lt hc).not_le⟩
theorem unbounded_le_Ici [semilattice_sup α] [no_max_order α] (a : α) : unbounded (≤) (set.Ici a) :=
(unbounded_le_Ioi a).mono set.Ioi_subset_Ici_self
theorem unbounded_lt_Ioi [semilattice_sup α] [no_max_order α] (a : α) : unbounded (<) (set.Ioi a) :=
unbounded_lt_of_unbounded_le (unbounded_le_Ioi a)
theorem unbounded_lt_Ici [semilattice_sup α] (a : α) : unbounded (<) (set.Ici a) :=
λ b, ⟨a ⊔ b, le_sup_left, le_sup_right.not_lt⟩
/-! ### Bounded initial segments -/
theorem bounded_inter_not (H : ∀ a b, ∃ m, ∀ c, r c a ∨ r c b → r c m) (a : α) :
bounded r (s ∩ {b | ¬ r b a}) ↔ bounded r s :=
begin
refine ⟨_, bounded.mono (set.inter_subset_left s _)⟩,
rintro ⟨b, hb⟩,
cases H a b with m hm,
exact ⟨m, λ c hc, hm c (or_iff_not_imp_left.2 (λ hca, (hb c ⟨hc, hca⟩)))⟩
end
theorem unbounded_inter_not (H : ∀ a b, ∃ m, ∀ c, r c a ∨ r c b → r c m) (a : α) :
unbounded r (s ∩ {b | ¬ r b a}) ↔ unbounded r s :=
by simp_rw [← not_bounded_iff, bounded_inter_not H]
/-! #### Less or equal -/
theorem bounded_le_inter_not_le [semilattice_sup α] (a : α) :
bounded (≤) (s ∩ {b | ¬ b ≤ a}) ↔ bounded (≤) s :=
bounded_inter_not (λ x y, ⟨x ⊔ y, λ z h, h.elim le_sup_of_le_left le_sup_of_le_right⟩) a
theorem unbounded_le_inter_not_le [semilattice_sup α] (a : α) :
unbounded (≤) (s ∩ {b | ¬ b ≤ a}) ↔ unbounded (≤) s :=
begin
rw [←not_bounded_iff, ←not_bounded_iff, not_iff_not],
exact bounded_le_inter_not_le a
end
theorem bounded_le_inter_lt [linear_order α] (a : α) :
bounded (≤) (s ∩ {b | a < b}) ↔ bounded (≤) s :=
by simp_rw [← not_le, bounded_le_inter_not_le]
theorem unbounded_le_inter_lt [linear_order α] (a : α) :
unbounded (≤) (s ∩ {b | a < b}) ↔ unbounded (≤) s :=
by { convert unbounded_le_inter_not_le a, ext, exact lt_iff_not_le }
theorem bounded_le_inter_le [linear_order α] (a : α) :
bounded (≤) (s ∩ {b | a ≤ b}) ↔ bounded (≤) s :=
begin
refine ⟨_, bounded.mono (set.inter_subset_left s _)⟩,
rw ←@bounded_le_inter_lt _ s _ a,
exact bounded.mono (λ x ⟨hx, hx'⟩, ⟨hx, le_of_lt hx'⟩)
end
theorem unbounded_le_inter_le [linear_order α] (a : α) :
unbounded (≤) (s ∩ {b | a ≤ b}) ↔ unbounded (≤) s :=
begin
rw [←not_bounded_iff, ←not_bounded_iff, not_iff_not],
exact bounded_le_inter_le a
end
/-! #### Less than -/
theorem bounded_lt_inter_not_lt [semilattice_sup α] (a : α) :
bounded (<) (s ∩ {b | ¬ b < a}) ↔ bounded (<) s :=
bounded_inter_not (λ x y, ⟨x ⊔ y, λ z h, h.elim lt_sup_of_lt_left lt_sup_of_lt_right⟩) a
theorem unbounded_lt_inter_not_lt [semilattice_sup α] (a : α) :
unbounded (<) (s ∩ {b | ¬ b < a}) ↔ unbounded (<) s :=
begin
rw [←not_bounded_iff, ←not_bounded_iff, not_iff_not],
exact bounded_lt_inter_not_lt a
end
theorem bounded_lt_inter_le [linear_order α] (a : α) :
bounded (<) (s ∩ {b | a ≤ b}) ↔ bounded (<) s :=
by { convert bounded_lt_inter_not_lt a, ext, exact not_lt.symm }
theorem unbounded_lt_inter_le [linear_order α] (a : α) :
unbounded (<) (s ∩ {b | a ≤ b}) ↔ unbounded (<) s :=
by { convert unbounded_lt_inter_not_lt a, ext, exact not_lt.symm }
theorem bounded_lt_inter_lt [linear_order α] [no_max_order α] (a : α) :
bounded (<) (s ∩ {b | a < b}) ↔ bounded (<) s :=
begin
rw [←bounded_le_iff_bounded_lt, ←bounded_le_iff_bounded_lt],
exact bounded_le_inter_lt a
end
theorem unbounded_lt_inter_lt [linear_order α] [no_max_order α] (a : α) :
unbounded (<) (s ∩ {b | a < b}) ↔ unbounded (<) s :=
begin
rw [←not_bounded_iff, ←not_bounded_iff, not_iff_not],
exact bounded_lt_inter_lt a
end
/-! #### Greater or equal -/
theorem bounded_ge_inter_not_ge [semilattice_inf α] (a : α) :
bounded (≥) (s ∩ {b | ¬ a ≤ b}) ↔ bounded (≥) s :=
@bounded_le_inter_not_le αᵒᵈ s _ a
theorem unbounded_ge_inter_not_ge [semilattice_inf α] (a : α) :
unbounded (≥) (s ∩ {b | ¬ a ≤ b}) ↔ unbounded (≥) s :=
@unbounded_le_inter_not_le αᵒᵈ s _ a
theorem bounded_ge_inter_gt [linear_order α] (a : α) :
bounded (≥) (s ∩ {b | b < a}) ↔ bounded (≥) s :=
@bounded_le_inter_lt αᵒᵈ s _ a
theorem unbounded_ge_inter_gt [linear_order α] (a : α) :
unbounded (≥) (s ∩ {b | b < a}) ↔ unbounded (≥) s :=
@unbounded_le_inter_lt αᵒᵈ s _ a
theorem bounded_ge_inter_ge [linear_order α] (a : α) :
bounded (≥) (s ∩ {b | b ≤ a}) ↔ bounded (≥) s :=
@bounded_le_inter_le αᵒᵈ s _ a
theorem unbounded_ge_iff_unbounded_inter_ge [linear_order α] (a : α) :
unbounded (≥) (s ∩ {b | b ≤ a}) ↔ unbounded (≥) s :=
@unbounded_le_inter_le αᵒᵈ s _ a
/-! #### Greater than -/
theorem bounded_gt_inter_not_gt [semilattice_inf α] (a : α) :
bounded (>) (s ∩ {b | ¬ a < b}) ↔ bounded (>) s :=
@bounded_lt_inter_not_lt αᵒᵈ s _ a
theorem unbounded_gt_inter_not_gt [semilattice_inf α] (a : α) :
unbounded (>) (s ∩ {b | ¬ a < b}) ↔ unbounded (>) s :=
@unbounded_lt_inter_not_lt αᵒᵈ s _ a
theorem bounded_gt_inter_ge [linear_order α] (a : α) :
bounded (>) (s ∩ {b | b ≤ a}) ↔ bounded (>) s :=
@bounded_lt_inter_le αᵒᵈ s _ a
theorem unbounded_inter_ge [linear_order α] (a : α) :
unbounded (>) (s ∩ {b | b ≤ a}) ↔ unbounded (>) s :=
@unbounded_lt_inter_le αᵒᵈ s _ a
theorem bounded_gt_inter_gt [linear_order α] [no_min_order α] (a : α) :
bounded (>) (s ∩ {b | b < a}) ↔ bounded (>) s :=
@bounded_lt_inter_lt αᵒᵈ s _ _ a
theorem unbounded_gt_inter_gt [linear_order α] [no_min_order α] (a : α) :
unbounded (>) (s ∩ {b | b < a}) ↔ unbounded (>) s :=
@unbounded_lt_inter_lt αᵒᵈ s _ _ a
end set
|
b5181cdc2d0a99fcd9b8cd93ee317e0ddac1f1be | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/algebra/order/monoid/with_zero/basic.lean | 35dc4316881639cdd7c87bffd4b4010d70be7907 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,079 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import algebra.order.monoid.with_zero.defs
import algebra.group_with_zero.basic
/-!
# An instance orphaned from `algebra.order.monoid.with_zero.defs`
We put this here to minimise imports: if you can move it back into
`algebra.order.monoid.with_zero.defs` without increasing imports, please do.
-/
open function
universe u
variables {α : Type u}
namespace with_zero
instance contravariant_class_mul_lt {α : Type u} [has_mul α] [partial_order α]
[contravariant_class α α (*) (<)] :
contravariant_class (with_zero α) (with_zero α) (*) (<) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ a b c h, _⟩,
have := ((zero_le _).trans_lt h).ne',
lift a to α using left_ne_zero_of_mul this,
lift c to α using right_ne_zero_of_mul this,
induction b using with_zero.rec_zero_coe,
exacts [zero_lt_coe _, coe_lt_coe.mpr (lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left' $ coe_lt_coe.mp h)]
end
end with_zero
|
bab80e35f2756a2752aa4f6ab1146376b99938d2 | 35677d2df3f081738fa6b08138e03ee36bc33cad | /src/data/padics/padic_numbers.lean | ce2f68965732e147a369f8d21a4ac109f53b0a7d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | gebner/mathlib | eab0150cc4f79ec45d2016a8c21750244a2e7ff0 | cc6a6edc397c55118df62831e23bfbd6e6c6b4ab | refs/heads/master | 1,625,574,853,976 | 1,586,712,827,000 | 1,586,712,827,000 | 99,101,412 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,586,716,389,000 | 1,501,667,958,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 32,536 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import data.real.cau_seq_completion
import data.padics.padic_norm algebra.archimedean analysis.normed_space.basic
import tactic.norm_cast
/-!
# p-adic numbers
This file defines the p-adic numbers (rationals) ℚ_p as the completion of ℚ with respect to the
p-adic norm. We show that the p-adic norm on ℚ extends to ℚ_p, that ℚ is embedded in ℚ_p, and that
ℚ_p is Cauchy complete.
## Important definitions
* `padic` : the type of p-adic numbers
* `padic_norm_e` : the rational valued p-adic norm on ℚ_p
## Notation
We introduce the notation ℚ_[p] for the p-adic numbers.
## Implementation notes
Much, but not all, of this file assumes that `p` is prime. This assumption is inferred automatically
by taking (prime p) as a type class argument.
We use the same concrete Cauchy sequence construction that is used to construct ℝ. ℚ_p inherits a
field structure from this construction. The extension of the norm on ℚ to ℚ_p is *not* analogous to
extending the absolute value to ℝ, and hence the proof that ℚ_p is complete is different from the
proof that ℝ is complete.
A small special-purpose simplification tactic, `padic_index_simp`, is used to manipulate sequence
indices in the proof that the norm extends.
`padic_norm_e` is the rational-valued p-adic norm on ℚ_p. To instantiate ℚ_p as a normed field, we
must cast this into a ℝ-valued norm. The ℝ-valued norm, using notation ∥ ∥ from normed spaces, is
the canonical representation of this norm.
Coercions from ℚ to ℚ_p are set up to work with the `norm_cast` tactic.
## References
* [F. Q. Gouêva, *p-adic numbers*][gouvea1997]
* [R. Y. Lewis, *A formal proof of Hensel's lemma over the p-adic integers*][lewis2019]
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-adic_number>
## Tags
p-adic, p adic, padic, norm, valuation, cauchy, completion, p-adic completion
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale classical
open nat multiplicity padic_norm cau_seq cau_seq.completion metric
/-- The type of Cauchy sequences of rationals with respect to the p-adic norm. -/
@[reducible] def padic_seq (p : ℕ) [p.prime] := cau_seq _ (padic_norm p)
namespace padic_seq
section
variables {p : ℕ} [nat.prime p]
/-- The p-adic norm of the entries of a nonzero Cauchy sequence of rationals is eventually
constant. -/
lemma stationary {f : cau_seq ℚ (padic_norm p)} (hf : ¬ f ≈ 0) :
∃ N, ∀ m n, N ≤ m → N ≤ n → padic_norm p (f n) = padic_norm p (f m) :=
have ∃ ε > 0, ∃ N1, ∀ j ≥ N1, ε ≤ padic_norm p (f j),
from cau_seq.abv_pos_of_not_lim_zero $ not_lim_zero_of_not_congr_zero hf,
let ⟨ε, hε, N1, hN1⟩ := this,
⟨N2, hN2⟩ := cau_seq.cauchy₂ f hε in
⟨ max N1 N2,
λ n m hn hm,
have padic_norm p (f n - f m) < ε, from hN2 _ _ (max_le_iff.1 hn).2 (max_le_iff.1 hm).2,
have padic_norm p (f n - f m) < padic_norm p (f n),
from lt_of_lt_of_le this $ hN1 _ (max_le_iff.1 hn).1,
have padic_norm p (f n - f m) < max (padic_norm p (f n)) (padic_norm p (f m)),
from lt_max_iff.2 (or.inl this),
begin
by_contradiction hne,
rw ←padic_norm.neg p (f m) at hne,
have hnam := add_eq_max_of_ne p hne,
rw [padic_norm.neg, max_comm] at hnam,
rw [←hnam, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm] at this,
apply _root_.lt_irrefl _ this
end ⟩
/-- For all n ≥ stationary_point f hf, the p-adic norm of f n is the same. -/
def stationary_point {f : padic_seq p} (hf : ¬ f ≈ 0) : ℕ :=
classical.some $ stationary hf
lemma stationary_point_spec {f : padic_seq p} (hf : ¬ f ≈ 0) :
∀ {m n}, m ≥ stationary_point hf → n ≥ stationary_point hf →
padic_norm p (f n) = padic_norm p (f m) :=
classical.some_spec $ stationary hf
/-- Since the norm of the entries of a Cauchy sequence is eventually stationary, we can lift the norm
to sequences. -/
def norm (f : padic_seq p) : ℚ :=
if hf : f ≈ 0 then 0 else padic_norm p (f (stationary_point hf))
lemma norm_zero_iff (f : padic_seq p) : f.norm = 0 ↔ f ≈ 0 :=
begin
constructor,
{ intro h,
by_contradiction hf,
unfold norm at h, split_ifs at h,
apply hf,
intros ε hε,
existsi stationary_point hf,
intros j hj,
have heq := stationary_point_spec hf (le_refl _) hj,
simpa [h, heq] },
{ intro h,
simp [norm, h] }
end
end
section embedding
open cau_seq
variables {p : ℕ} [nat.prime p]
lemma equiv_zero_of_val_eq_of_equiv_zero {f g : padic_seq p}
(h : ∀ k, padic_norm p (f k) = padic_norm p (g k)) (hf : f ≈ 0) : g ≈ 0 :=
λ ε hε, let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hf _ hε in
⟨i, λ j hj, by simpa [h] using hi _ hj⟩
lemma norm_nonzero_of_not_equiv_zero {f : padic_seq p} (hf : ¬ f ≈ 0) :
f.norm ≠ 0 :=
hf ∘ f.norm_zero_iff.1
lemma norm_eq_norm_app_of_nonzero {f : padic_seq p} (hf : ¬ f ≈ 0) :
∃ k, f.norm = padic_norm p k ∧ k ≠ 0 :=
have heq : f.norm = padic_norm p (f $ stationary_point hf), by simp [norm, hf],
⟨f $ stationary_point hf, heq,
λ h, norm_nonzero_of_not_equiv_zero hf (by simpa [h] using heq)⟩
lemma not_lim_zero_const_of_nonzero {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : ¬ lim_zero (const (padic_norm p) q) :=
λ h', hq $ const_lim_zero.1 h'
lemma not_equiv_zero_const_of_nonzero {q : ℚ} (hq : q ≠ 0) : ¬ (const (padic_norm p) q) ≈ 0 :=
λ h : lim_zero (const (padic_norm p) q - 0), not_lim_zero_const_of_nonzero hq $ by simpa using h
lemma norm_nonneg (f : padic_seq p) : f.norm ≥ 0 :=
if hf : f ≈ 0 then by simp [hf, norm]
else by simp [norm, hf, padic_norm.nonneg]
/-- An auxiliary lemma for manipulating sequence indices. -/
lemma lift_index_left_left {f : padic_seq p} (hf : ¬ f ≈ 0) (v2 v3 : ℕ) :
padic_norm p (f (stationary_point hf)) =
padic_norm p (f (max (stationary_point hf) (max v2 v3))) :=
let i := max (stationary_point hf) (max v2 v3) in
begin
apply stationary_point_spec hf,
{ apply le_max_left },
{ apply le_refl }
end
/-- An auxiliary lemma for manipulating sequence indices. -/
lemma lift_index_left {f : padic_seq p} (hf : ¬ f ≈ 0) (v1 v3 : ℕ) :
padic_norm p (f (stationary_point hf)) =
padic_norm p (f (max v1 (max (stationary_point hf) v3))) :=
let i := max v1 (max (stationary_point hf) v3) in
begin
apply stationary_point_spec hf,
{ apply le_trans,
{ apply le_max_left _ v3 },
{ apply le_max_right } },
{ apply le_refl }
end
/-- An auxiliary lemma for manipulating sequence indices. -/
lemma lift_index_right {f : padic_seq p} (hf : ¬ f ≈ 0) (v1 v2 : ℕ) :
padic_norm p (f (stationary_point hf)) =
padic_norm p (f (max v1 (max v2 (stationary_point hf)))) :=
let i := max v1 (max v2 (stationary_point hf)) in
begin
apply stationary_point_spec hf,
{ apply le_trans,
{ apply le_max_right v2 },
{ apply le_max_right } },
{ apply le_refl }
end
end embedding
end padic_seq
section
open padic_seq
private meta def index_simp_core (hh hf hg : expr)
(at_ : interactive.loc := interactive.loc.ns [none]) : tactic unit :=
do [v1, v2, v3] ← [hh, hf, hg].mmap
(λ n, tactic.mk_app ``stationary_point [n] <|> return n),
e1 ← tactic.mk_app ``lift_index_left_left [hh, v2, v3] <|> return `(true),
e2 ← tactic.mk_app ``lift_index_left [hf, v1, v3] <|> return `(true),
e3 ← tactic.mk_app ``lift_index_right [hg, v1, v2] <|> return `(true),
sl ← [e1, e2, e3].mfoldl (λ s e, simp_lemmas.add s e) simp_lemmas.mk,
when at_.include_goal (tactic.simp_target sl),
hs ← at_.get_locals, hs.mmap' (tactic.simp_hyp sl [])
/--
This is a special-purpose tactic that lifts padic_norm (f (stationary_point f)) to
padic_norm (f (max _ _ _)).
-/
meta def tactic.interactive.padic_index_simp (l : interactive.parse interactive.types.pexpr_list)
(at_ : interactive.parse interactive.types.location) : tactic unit :=
do [h, f, g] ← l.mmap tactic.i_to_expr,
index_simp_core h f g at_
end
namespace padic_seq
section embedding
open cau_seq
variables {p : ℕ} [hp : nat.prime p]
include hp
lemma norm_mul (f g : padic_seq p) : (f * g).norm = f.norm * g.norm :=
if hf : f ≈ 0 then
have hg : f * g ≈ 0, from mul_equiv_zero' _ hf,
by simp [hf, hg, norm]
else if hg : g ≈ 0 then
have hf : f * g ≈ 0, from mul_equiv_zero _ hg,
by simp [hf, hg, norm]
else
have hfg : ¬ f * g ≈ 0, by apply mul_not_equiv_zero; assumption,
begin
unfold norm,
split_ifs,
padic_index_simp [hfg, hf, hg],
apply padic_norm.mul
end
lemma eq_zero_iff_equiv_zero (f : padic_seq p) : mk f = 0 ↔ f ≈ 0 :=
mk_eq
lemma ne_zero_iff_nequiv_zero (f : padic_seq p) : mk f ≠ 0 ↔ ¬ f ≈ 0 :=
not_iff_not.2 (eq_zero_iff_equiv_zero _)
lemma norm_const (q : ℚ) : norm (const (padic_norm p) q) = padic_norm p q :=
if hq : q = 0 then
have (const (padic_norm p) q) ≈ 0,
by simp [hq]; apply setoid.refl (const (padic_norm p) 0),
by subst hq; simp [norm, this]
else
have ¬ (const (padic_norm p) q) ≈ 0, from not_equiv_zero_const_of_nonzero hq,
by simp [norm, this]
lemma norm_image (a : padic_seq p) (ha : ¬ a ≈ 0) :
(∃ (n : ℤ), a.norm = ↑p ^ (-n)) :=
let ⟨k, hk, hk'⟩ := norm_eq_norm_app_of_nonzero ha in
by simpa [hk] using padic_norm.image p hk'
lemma norm_one : norm (1 : padic_seq p) = 1 :=
have h1 : ¬ (1 : padic_seq p) ≈ 0, from one_not_equiv_zero _,
by simp [h1, norm, hp.one_lt]
private lemma norm_eq_of_equiv_aux {f g : padic_seq p} (hf : ¬ f ≈ 0) (hg : ¬ g ≈ 0) (hfg : f ≈ g)
(h : padic_norm p (f (stationary_point hf)) ≠ padic_norm p (g (stationary_point hg)))
(hgt : padic_norm p (f (stationary_point hf)) > padic_norm p (g (stationary_point hg))) :
false :=
begin
have hpn : padic_norm p (f (stationary_point hf)) - padic_norm p (g (stationary_point hg)) > 0,
from sub_pos_of_lt hgt,
cases hfg _ hpn with N hN,
let i := max N (max (stationary_point hf) (stationary_point hg)),
have hi : i ≥ N, from le_max_left _ _,
have hN' := hN _ hi,
padic_index_simp [N, hf, hg] at hN' h hgt,
have hpne : padic_norm p (f i) ≠ padic_norm p (-(g i)),
by rwa [ ←padic_norm.neg p (g i)] at h,
let hpnem := add_eq_max_of_ne p hpne,
have hpeq : padic_norm p ((f - g) i) = max (padic_norm p (f i)) (padic_norm p (g i)),
{ rwa padic_norm.neg at hpnem },
rw [hpeq, max_eq_left_of_lt hgt] at hN',
have : padic_norm p (f i) < padic_norm p (f i),
{ apply lt_of_lt_of_le hN', apply sub_le_self, apply padic_norm.nonneg },
exact lt_irrefl _ this
end
private lemma norm_eq_of_equiv {f g : padic_seq p} (hf : ¬ f ≈ 0) (hg : ¬ g ≈ 0) (hfg : f ≈ g) :
padic_norm p (f (stationary_point hf)) = padic_norm p (g (stationary_point hg)) :=
begin
by_contradiction h,
cases (decidable.em (padic_norm p (f (stationary_point hf)) >
padic_norm p (g (stationary_point hg))))
with hgt hngt,
{ exact norm_eq_of_equiv_aux hf hg hfg h hgt },
{ apply norm_eq_of_equiv_aux hg hf (setoid.symm hfg) (ne.symm h),
apply lt_of_le_of_ne,
apply le_of_not_gt hngt,
apply h }
end
theorem norm_equiv {f g : padic_seq p} (hfg : f ≈ g) : f.norm = g.norm :=
if hf : f ≈ 0 then
have hg : g ≈ 0, from setoid.trans (setoid.symm hfg) hf,
by simp [norm, hf, hg]
else have hg : ¬ g ≈ 0, from hf ∘ setoid.trans hfg,
by unfold norm; split_ifs; exact norm_eq_of_equiv hf hg hfg
private lemma norm_nonarchimedean_aux {f g : padic_seq p}
(hfg : ¬ f + g ≈ 0) (hf : ¬ f ≈ 0) (hg : ¬ g ≈ 0) : (f + g).norm ≤ max (f.norm) (g.norm) :=
begin
unfold norm, split_ifs,
padic_index_simp [hfg, hf, hg],
apply padic_norm.nonarchimedean
end
theorem norm_nonarchimedean (f g : padic_seq p) : (f + g).norm ≤ max (f.norm) (g.norm) :=
if hfg : f + g ≈ 0 then
have 0 ≤ max (f.norm) (g.norm), from le_max_left_of_le (norm_nonneg _),
by simpa [hfg, norm]
else if hf : f ≈ 0 then
have hfg' : f + g ≈ g,
{ change lim_zero (f - 0) at hf,
show lim_zero (f + g - g), by simpa using hf },
have hcfg : (f + g).norm = g.norm, from norm_equiv hfg',
have hcl : f.norm = 0, from (norm_zero_iff f).2 hf,
have max (f.norm) (g.norm) = g.norm,
by rw hcl; exact max_eq_right (norm_nonneg _),
by rw [this, hcfg]
else if hg : g ≈ 0 then
have hfg' : f + g ≈ f,
{ change lim_zero (g - 0) at hg,
show lim_zero (f + g - f), by simpa [add_sub_cancel'] using hg },
have hcfg : (f + g).norm = f.norm, from norm_equiv hfg',
have hcl : g.norm = 0, from (norm_zero_iff g).2 hg,
have max (f.norm) (g.norm) = f.norm,
by rw hcl; exact max_eq_left (norm_nonneg _),
by rw [this, hcfg]
else norm_nonarchimedean_aux hfg hf hg
lemma norm_eq {f g : padic_seq p} (h : ∀ k, padic_norm p (f k) = padic_norm p (g k)) :
f.norm = g.norm :=
if hf : f ≈ 0 then
have hg : g ≈ 0, from equiv_zero_of_val_eq_of_equiv_zero h hf,
by simp [hf, hg, norm]
else
have hg : ¬ g ≈ 0, from λ hg, hf $ equiv_zero_of_val_eq_of_equiv_zero (by simp [h]) hg,
begin
simp [hg, hf, norm],
let i := max (stationary_point hf) (stationary_point hg),
have hpf : padic_norm p (f (stationary_point hf)) = padic_norm p (f i),
{ apply stationary_point_spec, apply le_max_left, apply le_refl },
have hpg : padic_norm p (g (stationary_point hg)) = padic_norm p (g i),
{ apply stationary_point_spec, apply le_max_right, apply le_refl },
rw [hpf, hpg, h]
end
lemma norm_neg (a : padic_seq p) : (-a).norm = a.norm :=
norm_eq $ by simp
lemma norm_eq_of_add_equiv_zero {f g : padic_seq p} (h : f + g ≈ 0) : f.norm = g.norm :=
have lim_zero (f + g - 0), from h,
have f ≈ -g, from show lim_zero (f - (-g)), by simpa,
have f.norm = (-g).norm, from norm_equiv this,
by simpa [norm_neg] using this
lemma add_eq_max_of_ne {f g : padic_seq p} (hfgne : f.norm ≠ g.norm) :
(f + g).norm = max f.norm g.norm :=
have hfg : ¬f + g ≈ 0, from mt norm_eq_of_add_equiv_zero hfgne,
if hf : f ≈ 0 then
have lim_zero (f - 0), from hf,
have f + g ≈ g, from show lim_zero ((f + g) - g), by simpa,
have h1 : (f+g).norm = g.norm, from norm_equiv this,
have h2 : f.norm = 0, from (norm_zero_iff _).2 hf,
by rw [h1, h2]; rw max_eq_right (norm_nonneg _)
else if hg : g ≈ 0 then
have lim_zero (g - 0), from hg,
have f + g ≈ f, from show lim_zero ((f + g) - f), by rw [add_sub_cancel']; simpa,
have h1 : (f+g).norm = f.norm, from norm_equiv this,
have h2 : g.norm = 0, from (norm_zero_iff _).2 hg,
by rw [h1, h2]; rw max_eq_left (norm_nonneg _)
else
begin
unfold norm at ⊢ hfgne, split_ifs at ⊢ hfgne,
padic_index_simp [hfg, hf, hg] at ⊢ hfgne,
apply padic_norm.add_eq_max_of_ne,
simpa [hf, hg, norm] using hfgne
end
end embedding
end padic_seq
/-- The p-adic numbers `Q_[p]` are the Cauchy completion of `ℚ` with respect to the p-adic norm. -/
def padic (p : ℕ) [nat.prime p] := @cau_seq.completion.Cauchy _ _ _ _ (padic_norm p) _
notation `ℚ_[` p `]` := padic p
namespace padic
section completion
variables {p : ℕ} [nat.prime p]
/-- The discrete field structure on ℚ_p is inherited from the Cauchy completion construction. -/
instance field : field (ℚ_[p]) :=
cau_seq.completion.field
instance : inhabited ℚ_[p] := ⟨0⟩
-- short circuits
instance : has_zero ℚ_[p] := by apply_instance
instance : has_one ℚ_[p] := by apply_instance
instance : has_add ℚ_[p] := by apply_instance
instance : has_mul ℚ_[p] := by apply_instance
instance : has_sub ℚ_[p] := by apply_instance
instance : has_neg ℚ_[p] := by apply_instance
instance : has_div ℚ_[p] := by apply_instance
instance : add_comm_group ℚ_[p] := by apply_instance
instance : comm_ring ℚ_[p] := by apply_instance
/-- Builds the equivalence class of a Cauchy sequence of rationals. -/
def mk : padic_seq p → ℚ_[p] := quotient.mk
end completion
section completion
variables (p : ℕ) [nat.prime p]
lemma mk_eq {f g : padic_seq p} : mk f = mk g ↔ f ≈ g := quotient.eq
/-- Embeds the rational numbers in the p-adic numbers. -/
def of_rat : ℚ → ℚ_[p] := cau_seq.completion.of_rat
@[simp] lemma of_rat_add : ∀ (x y : ℚ), of_rat p (x + y) = of_rat p x + of_rat p y :=
cau_seq.completion.of_rat_add
@[simp] lemma of_rat_neg : ∀ (x : ℚ), of_rat p (-x) = -of_rat p x :=
cau_seq.completion.of_rat_neg
@[simp] lemma of_rat_mul : ∀ (x y : ℚ), of_rat p (x * y) = of_rat p x * of_rat p y :=
cau_seq.completion.of_rat_mul
@[simp] lemma of_rat_sub : ∀ (x y : ℚ), of_rat p (x - y) = of_rat p x - of_rat p y :=
cau_seq.completion.of_rat_sub
@[simp] lemma of_rat_div : ∀ (x y : ℚ), of_rat p (x / y) = of_rat p x / of_rat p y :=
cau_seq.completion.of_rat_div
@[simp] lemma of_rat_one : of_rat p 1 = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma of_rat_zero : of_rat p 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma cast_eq_of_rat_of_nat (n : ℕ) : (↑n : ℚ_[p]) = of_rat p n :=
begin
induction n with n ih,
{ refl },
{ simpa using ih }
end
-- without short circuits, this needs an increase of class.instance_max_depth
@[simp] lemma cast_eq_of_rat_of_int (n : ℤ) : ↑n = of_rat p n :=
by induction n; simp
lemma cast_eq_of_rat : ∀ (q : ℚ), (↑q : ℚ_[p]) = of_rat p q
| ⟨n, d, h1, h2⟩ :=
show ↑n / ↑d = _, from
have (⟨n, d, h1, h2⟩ : ℚ) = rat.mk n d, from rat.num_denom',
by simp [this, rat.mk_eq_div, of_rat_div]
@[move_cast] lemma coe_add : ∀ {x y : ℚ}, (↑(x + y) : ℚ_[p]) = ↑x + ↑y := by simp [cast_eq_of_rat]
@[move_cast] lemma coe_neg : ∀ {x : ℚ}, (↑(-x) : ℚ_[p]) = -↑x := by simp [cast_eq_of_rat]
@[move_cast] lemma coe_mul : ∀ {x y : ℚ}, (↑(x * y) : ℚ_[p]) = ↑x * ↑y := by simp [cast_eq_of_rat]
@[move_cast] lemma coe_sub : ∀ {x y : ℚ}, (↑(x - y) : ℚ_[p]) = ↑x - ↑y := by simp [cast_eq_of_rat]
@[move_cast] lemma coe_div : ∀ {x y : ℚ}, (↑(x / y) : ℚ_[p]) = ↑x / ↑y := by simp [cast_eq_of_rat]
@[squash_cast] lemma coe_one : (↑1 : ℚ_[p]) = 1 := rfl
@[squash_cast] lemma coe_zero : (↑0 : ℚ_[p]) = 0 := rfl
lemma const_equiv {q r : ℚ} : const (padic_norm p) q ≈ const (padic_norm p) r ↔ q = r :=
⟨ λ heq : lim_zero (const (padic_norm p) (q - r)),
eq_of_sub_eq_zero $ const_lim_zero.1 heq,
λ heq, by rw heq; apply setoid.refl _ ⟩
lemma of_rat_eq {q r : ℚ} : of_rat p q = of_rat p r ↔ q = r :=
⟨(const_equiv p).1 ∘ quotient.eq.1, λ h, by rw h⟩
@[elim_cast] lemma coe_inj {q r : ℚ} : (↑q : ℚ_[p]) = ↑r ↔ q = r :=
by simp [cast_eq_of_rat, of_rat_eq]
instance : char_zero ℚ_[p] :=
⟨λ m n, by { rw ← rat.cast_coe_nat, norm_cast, exact id }⟩
end completion
end padic
/-- The rational-valued p-adic norm on ℚ_p is lifted from the norm on Cauchy sequences. The
canonical form of this function is the normed space instance, with notation `∥ ∥`. -/
def padic_norm_e {p : ℕ} [hp : nat.prime p] : ℚ_[p] → ℚ :=
quotient.lift padic_seq.norm $ @padic_seq.norm_equiv _ _
namespace padic_norm_e
section embedding
open padic_seq
variables {p : ℕ} [nat.prime p]
lemma defn (f : padic_seq p) {ε : ℚ} (hε : ε > 0) : ∃ N, ∀ i ≥ N, padic_norm_e (⟦f⟧ - f i) < ε :=
begin
simp only [padic.cast_eq_of_rat],
change ∃ N, ∀ i ≥ N, (f - const _ (f i)).norm < ε,
by_contradiction h,
cases cauchy₂ f hε with N hN,
have : ∀ N, ∃ i ≥ N, (f - const _ (f i)).norm ≥ ε,
by simpa [not_forall] using h,
rcases this N with ⟨i, hi, hge⟩,
have hne : ¬ (f - const (padic_norm p) (f i)) ≈ 0,
{ intro h, unfold padic_seq.norm at hge; split_ifs at hge, exact not_lt_of_ge hge hε },
unfold padic_seq.norm at hge; split_ifs at hge,
apply not_le_of_gt _ hge,
cases decidable.em ((stationary_point hne) ≥ N) with hgen hngen,
{ apply hN; assumption },
{ have := stationary_point_spec hne (le_refl _) (le_of_not_le hngen),
rw ←this,
apply hN,
apply le_refl, assumption }
end
protected lemma nonneg (q : ℚ_[p]) : padic_norm_e q ≥ 0 :=
quotient.induction_on q $ norm_nonneg
lemma zero_def : (0 : ℚ_[p]) = ⟦0⟧ := rfl
lemma zero_iff (q : ℚ_[p]) : padic_norm_e q = 0 ↔ q = 0 :=
quotient.induction_on q $
by simpa only [zero_def, quotient.eq] using norm_zero_iff
@[simp] protected lemma zero : padic_norm_e (0 : ℚ_[p]) = 0 :=
(zero_iff _).2 rfl
/-- Theorems about `padic_norm_e` are named with a `'` so the names do not conflict with the
equivalent theorems about `norm` (`∥ ∥`). -/
@[simp] protected lemma one' : padic_norm_e (1 : ℚ_[p]) = 1 :=
norm_one
@[simp] protected lemma neg (q : ℚ_[p]) : padic_norm_e (-q) = padic_norm_e q :=
quotient.induction_on q $ norm_neg
/-- Theorems about `padic_norm_e` are named with a `'` so the names do not conflict with the
equivalent theorems about `norm` (`∥ ∥`). -/
theorem nonarchimedean' (q r : ℚ_[p]) :
padic_norm_e (q + r) ≤ max (padic_norm_e q) (padic_norm_e r) :=
quotient.induction_on₂ q r $ norm_nonarchimedean
/-- Theorems about `padic_norm_e` are named with a `'` so the names do not conflict with the
equivalent theorems about `norm` (`∥ ∥`). -/
theorem add_eq_max_of_ne' {q r : ℚ_[p]} :
padic_norm_e q ≠ padic_norm_e r → padic_norm_e (q + r) = max (padic_norm_e q) (padic_norm_e r) :=
quotient.induction_on₂ q r $ λ _ _, padic_seq.add_eq_max_of_ne
lemma triangle_ineq (x y z : ℚ_[p]) :
padic_norm_e (x - z) ≤ padic_norm_e (x - y) + padic_norm_e (y - z) :=
calc padic_norm_e (x - z) = padic_norm_e ((x - y) + (y - z)) : by rw sub_add_sub_cancel
... ≤ max (padic_norm_e (x - y)) (padic_norm_e (y - z)) : padic_norm_e.nonarchimedean' _ _
... ≤ padic_norm_e (x - y) + padic_norm_e (y - z) :
max_le_add_of_nonneg (padic_norm_e.nonneg _) (padic_norm_e.nonneg _)
protected lemma add (q r : ℚ_[p]) : padic_norm_e (q + r) ≤ (padic_norm_e q) + (padic_norm_e r) :=
calc
padic_norm_e (q + r) ≤ max (padic_norm_e q) (padic_norm_e r) : nonarchimedean' _ _
... ≤ (padic_norm_e q) + (padic_norm_e r) :
max_le_add_of_nonneg (padic_norm_e.nonneg _) (padic_norm_e.nonneg _)
protected lemma mul' (q r : ℚ_[p]) : padic_norm_e (q * r) = (padic_norm_e q) * (padic_norm_e r) :=
quotient.induction_on₂ q r $ norm_mul
instance : is_absolute_value (@padic_norm_e p _) :=
{ abv_nonneg := padic_norm_e.nonneg,
abv_eq_zero := zero_iff,
abv_add := padic_norm_e.add,
abv_mul := padic_norm_e.mul' }
@[simp] lemma eq_padic_norm' (q : ℚ) : padic_norm_e (padic.of_rat p q) = padic_norm p q :=
norm_const _
protected theorem image' {q : ℚ_[p]} : q ≠ 0 → ∃ n : ℤ, padic_norm_e q = p ^ (-n) :=
quotient.induction_on q $ λ f hf,
have ¬ f ≈ 0, from (ne_zero_iff_nequiv_zero f).1 hf,
norm_image f this
lemma sub_rev (q r : ℚ_[p]) : padic_norm_e (q - r) = padic_norm_e (r - q) :=
by rw ←(padic_norm_e.neg); simp
end embedding
end padic_norm_e
namespace padic
section complete
open padic_seq padic
theorem rat_dense' {p : ℕ} [nat.prime p] (q : ℚ_[p]) {ε : ℚ} (hε : ε > 0) :
∃ r : ℚ, padic_norm_e (q - r) < ε :=
quotient.induction_on q $ λ q',
have ∃ N, ∀ m n ≥ N, padic_norm p (q' m - q' n) < ε, from cauchy₂ _ hε,
let ⟨N, hN⟩ := this in
⟨q' N,
begin
simp only [padic.cast_eq_of_rat],
change padic_seq.norm (q' - const _ (q' N)) < ε,
cases decidable.em ((q' - const (padic_norm p) (q' N)) ≈ 0) with heq hne',
{ simpa only [heq, padic_seq.norm, dif_pos] },
{ simp only [padic_seq.norm, dif_neg hne'],
change padic_norm p (q' _ - q' _) < ε,
have := stationary_point_spec hne',
cases decidable.em (N ≥ stationary_point hne') with hle hle,
{ have := eq.symm (this (le_refl _) hle),
simp at this, simpa [this] },
{ apply hN,
apply le_of_lt, apply lt_of_not_ge, apply hle, apply le_refl }}
end⟩
variables {p : ℕ} [nat.prime p] (f : cau_seq _ (@padic_norm_e p _))
open classical
private lemma div_nat_pos (n : ℕ) : (1 / ((n + 1): ℚ)) > 0 :=
div_pos zero_lt_one (by exact_mod_cast succ_pos _)
def lim_seq : ℕ → ℚ := λ n, classical.some (rat_dense' (f n) (div_nat_pos n))
lemma exi_rat_seq_conv {ε : ℚ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ N, ∀ i ≥ N, padic_norm_e (f i - ((lim_seq f) i : ℚ_[p])) < ε :=
begin
refine (exists_nat_gt (1/ε)).imp (λ N hN i hi, _),
have h := classical.some_spec (rat_dense' (f i) (div_nat_pos i)),
refine lt_of_lt_of_le h (div_le_of_le_mul (by exact_mod_cast succ_pos _) _),
rw right_distrib,
apply le_add_of_le_of_nonneg,
{ exact le_mul_of_div_le hε (le_trans (le_of_lt hN) (by exact_mod_cast hi)) },
{ apply le_of_lt, simpa }
end
lemma exi_rat_seq_conv_cauchy : is_cau_seq (padic_norm p) (lim_seq f) :=
assume ε hε,
have hε3 : ε / 3 > 0, from div_pos hε (by norm_num),
let ⟨N, hN⟩ := exi_rat_seq_conv f hε3,
⟨N2, hN2⟩ := f.cauchy₂ hε3 in
begin
existsi max N N2,
intros j hj,
suffices : padic_norm_e ((↑(lim_seq f j) - f (max N N2)) + (f (max N N2) - lim_seq f (max N N2))) < ε,
{ ring at this ⊢,
rw [← padic_norm_e.eq_padic_norm', ← padic.cast_eq_of_rat],
exact_mod_cast this },
{ apply lt_of_le_of_lt,
{ apply padic_norm_e.add },
{ have : (3 : ℚ) ≠ 0, by norm_num,
have : ε = ε / 3 + ε / 3 + ε / 3,
{ apply eq_of_mul_eq_mul_left this, simp [left_distrib, mul_div_cancel' _ this ], ring },
rw this,
apply add_lt_add,
{ suffices : padic_norm_e ((↑(lim_seq f j) - f j) + (f j - f (max N N2))) < ε / 3 + ε / 3,
by simpa [sub_eq_add_neg],
apply lt_of_le_of_lt,
{ apply padic_norm_e.add },
{ apply add_lt_add,
{ rw [padic_norm_e.sub_rev],
apply_mod_cast hN,
exact le_of_max_le_left hj },
{ apply hN2,
exact le_of_max_le_right hj,
apply le_max_right }}},
{ apply_mod_cast hN,
apply le_max_left }}}
end
private def lim' : padic_seq p := ⟨_, exi_rat_seq_conv_cauchy f⟩
private def lim : ℚ_[p] := ⟦lim' f⟧
theorem complete' : ∃ q : ℚ_[p], ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ i ≥ N, padic_norm_e (q - f i) < ε :=
⟨ lim f,
λ ε hε,
let ⟨N, hN⟩ := exi_rat_seq_conv f (show ε / 2 > 0, from div_pos hε (by norm_num)),
⟨N2, hN2⟩ := padic_norm_e.defn (lim' f) (show ε / 2 > 0, from div_pos hε (by norm_num)) in
begin
existsi max N N2,
intros i hi,
suffices : padic_norm_e ((lim f - lim' f i) + (lim' f i - f i)) < ε,
{ ring at this; exact this },
{ apply lt_of_le_of_lt,
{ apply padic_norm_e.add },
{ have : ε = ε / 2 + ε / 2, by rw ←(add_self_div_two ε); simp,
rw this,
apply add_lt_add,
{ apply hN2, exact le_of_max_le_right hi },
{ rw_mod_cast [padic_norm_e.sub_rev],
apply hN,
exact le_of_max_le_left hi }}}
end ⟩
end complete
section normed_space
variables (p : ℕ) [nat.prime p]
instance : has_dist ℚ_[p] := ⟨λ x y, padic_norm_e (x - y)⟩
instance : metric_space ℚ_[p] :=
{ dist_self := by simp [dist],
dist_comm := λ x y, by unfold dist; rw ←padic_norm_e.neg (x - y); simp,
dist_triangle :=
begin
intros, unfold dist,
exact_mod_cast padic_norm_e.triangle_ineq _ _ _,
end,
eq_of_dist_eq_zero :=
begin
unfold dist, intros _ _ h,
apply eq_of_sub_eq_zero,
apply (padic_norm_e.zero_iff _).1,
exact_mod_cast h
end }
instance : has_norm ℚ_[p] := ⟨λ x, padic_norm_e x⟩
instance : normed_field ℚ_[p] :=
{ dist_eq := λ _ _, rfl,
norm_mul' := by simp [has_norm.norm, padic_norm_e.mul'] }
instance : is_absolute_value (λ a : ℚ_[p], ∥a∥) :=
{ abv_nonneg := norm_nonneg,
abv_eq_zero := λ _, norm_eq_zero,
abv_add := norm_add_le,
abv_mul := by simp [has_norm.norm, padic_norm_e.mul'] }
theorem rat_dense {p : ℕ} {hp : p.prime} (q : ℚ_[p]) {ε : ℝ} (hε : ε > 0) :
∃ r : ℚ, ∥q - r∥ < ε :=
let ⟨ε', hε'l, hε'r⟩ := exists_rat_btwn hε,
⟨r, hr⟩ := rat_dense' q (by simpa using hε'l) in
⟨r, lt.trans (by simpa [has_norm.norm] using hr) hε'r⟩
end normed_space
end padic
namespace padic_norm_e
section normed_space
variables {p : ℕ} [hp : p.prime]
include hp
@[simp] protected lemma mul (q r : ℚ_[p]) : ∥q * r∥ = ∥q∥ * ∥r∥ :=
by simp [has_norm.norm, padic_norm_e.mul']
protected lemma is_norm (q : ℚ_[p]) : ↑(padic_norm_e q) = ∥q∥ := rfl
theorem nonarchimedean (q r : ℚ_[p]) : ∥q + r∥ ≤ max (∥q∥) (∥r∥) :=
begin
unfold has_norm.norm,
exact_mod_cast nonarchimedean' _ _
end
theorem add_eq_max_of_ne {q r : ℚ_[p]} (h : ∥q∥ ≠ ∥r∥) : ∥q+r∥ = max (∥q∥) (∥r∥) :=
begin
unfold has_norm.norm,
apply_mod_cast add_eq_max_of_ne',
intro h',
apply h,
unfold has_norm.norm,
exact_mod_cast h'
end
@[simp] lemma eq_padic_norm (q : ℚ) : ∥(↑q : ℚ_[p])∥ = padic_norm p q :=
begin
unfold has_norm.norm,
rw [← padic_norm_e.eq_padic_norm', ← padic.cast_eq_of_rat]
end
instance : nondiscrete_normed_field ℚ_[p] :=
{ non_trivial := ⟨padic.of_rat p (p⁻¹), begin
have h0 : p ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt (hp.pos),
have h1 : 1 < p := hp.one_lt,
rw [← padic.cast_eq_of_rat, eq_padic_norm],
simp only [padic_norm, inv_eq_zero],
simp only [if_neg] {discharger := `[exact_mod_cast h0]},
norm_cast,
simp only [padic_val_rat.inv] {discharger := `[exact_mod_cast h0]},
rw [neg_neg, padic_val_rat.padic_val_rat_self h1],
erw _root_.pow_one,
exact_mod_cast h1,
end⟩ }
protected theorem image {q : ℚ_[p]} : q ≠ 0 → ∃ n : ℤ, ∥q∥ = ↑((↑p : ℚ) ^ (-n)) :=
quotient.induction_on q $ λ f hf,
have ¬ f ≈ 0, from (padic_seq.ne_zero_iff_nequiv_zero f).1 hf,
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := padic_seq.norm_image f this in
⟨n, congr_arg coe hn⟩
protected lemma is_rat (q : ℚ_[p]) : ∃ q' : ℚ, ∥q∥ = ↑q' :=
if h : q = 0 then ⟨0, by simp [h]⟩
else let ⟨n, hn⟩ := padic_norm_e.image h in ⟨_, hn⟩
def rat_norm (q : ℚ_[p]) : ℚ := classical.some (padic_norm_e.is_rat q)
lemma eq_rat_norm (q : ℚ_[p]) : ∥q∥ = rat_norm q := classical.some_spec (padic_norm_e.is_rat q)
theorem norm_rat_le_one : ∀ {q : ℚ} (hq : ¬ p ∣ q.denom), ∥(q : ℚ_[p])∥ ≤ 1
| ⟨n, d, hn, hd⟩ := λ hq : ¬ p ∣ d,
if hnz : n = 0 then
have (⟨n, d, hn, hd⟩ : ℚ) = 0,
from rat.zero_iff_num_zero.mpr hnz,
by norm_num [this]
else
begin
have hnz' : {rat . num := n, denom := d, pos := hn, cop := hd} ≠ 0, from mt rat.zero_iff_num_zero.1 hnz,
rw [padic_norm_e.eq_padic_norm],
norm_cast,
rw [padic_norm.eq_fpow_of_nonzero p hnz', padic_val_rat_def p hnz'],
have h : (multiplicity p d).get _ = 0, by simp [multiplicity_eq_zero_of_not_dvd, hq],
rw_mod_cast [h, sub_zero],
apply fpow_le_one_of_nonpos,
{ exact_mod_cast le_of_lt hp.one_lt, },
{ apply neg_nonpos_of_nonneg, norm_cast, simp, }
end
lemma eq_of_norm_add_lt_right {p : ℕ} {hp : p.prime} {z1 z2 : ℚ_[p]}
(h : ∥z1 + z2∥ < ∥z2∥) : ∥z1∥ = ∥z2∥ :=
by_contradiction $ λ hne,
not_lt_of_ge (by rw padic_norm_e.add_eq_max_of_ne hne; apply le_max_right) h
lemma eq_of_norm_add_lt_left {p : ℕ} {hp : p.prime} {z1 z2 : ℚ_[p]}
(h : ∥z1 + z2∥ < ∥z1∥) : ∥z1∥ = ∥z2∥ :=
by_contradiction $ λ hne,
not_lt_of_ge (by rw padic_norm_e.add_eq_max_of_ne hne; apply le_max_left) h
end normed_space
end padic_norm_e
namespace padic
variables {p : ℕ} [nat.prime p]
set_option eqn_compiler.zeta true
instance complete : cau_seq.is_complete ℚ_[p] norm :=
begin
split, intro f,
have cau_seq_norm_e : is_cau_seq padic_norm_e f,
{ intros ε hε,
let h := is_cau f ε (by exact_mod_cast hε),
unfold norm at h,
apply_mod_cast h },
cases padic.complete' ⟨f, cau_seq_norm_e⟩ with q hq,
existsi q,
intros ε hε,
cases exists_rat_btwn hε with ε' hε',
norm_cast at hε',
cases hq ε' hε'.1 with N hN, existsi N,
intros i hi, let h := hN i hi,
unfold norm,
rw_mod_cast [cau_seq.sub_apply, padic_norm_e.sub_rev],
refine lt.trans _ hε'.2,
exact_mod_cast hN i hi
end
lemma padic_norm_e_lim_le {f : cau_seq ℚ_[p] norm} {a : ℝ} (ha : a > 0)
(hf : ∀ i, ∥f i∥ ≤ a) : ∥f.lim∥ ≤ a :=
let ⟨N, hN⟩ := setoid.symm (cau_seq.equiv_lim f) _ ha in
calc ∥f.lim∥ = ∥f.lim - f N + f N∥ : by simp
... ≤ max (∥f.lim - f N∥) (∥f N∥) : padic_norm_e.nonarchimedean _ _
... ≤ a : max_le (le_of_lt (hN _ (le_refl _))) (hf _)
end padic
|
4f64b4a14ba5c27d2c9106ddf2ac7a4c065c11ee | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/category_theory/limits/shapes/finite_limits.lean | c3664f088370a29d969859d01e075fce4385ca69 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,685 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import category_theory.fin_category
import category_theory.limits.shapes.binary_products
import category_theory.limits.shapes.equalizers
import category_theory.limits.shapes.wide_pullbacks
import category_theory.limits.shapes.pullbacks
import data.fintype.option
/-!
# Categories with finite limits.
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
A typeclass for categories with all finite (co)limits.
-/
universes w' w v' u' v u
noncomputable theory
open category_theory
namespace category_theory.limits
variables (C : Type u) [category.{v} C]
/--
A category has all finite limits if every functor `J ⥤ C` with a `fin_category J`
instance and `J : Type` has a limit.
This is often called 'finitely complete'.
-/
-- We can't just made this an `abbreviation`
-- because of https://github.com/leanprover-community/lean/issues/429
class has_finite_limits : Prop :=
(out (J : Type) [𝒥 : small_category J] [@fin_category J 𝒥] : @has_limits_of_shape J 𝒥 C _)
@[priority 100]
instance has_limits_of_shape_of_has_finite_limits
(J : Type w) [small_category J] [fin_category J] [has_finite_limits C] :
has_limits_of_shape J C :=
begin
apply has_limits_of_shape_of_equivalence (fin_category.equiv_as_type J),
apply has_finite_limits.out
end
@[priority 100]
instance has_finite_limits_of_has_limits_of_size [has_limits_of_size.{v' u'} C] :
has_finite_limits C :=
⟨λ J hJ hJ', by { haveI := has_limits_of_size_shrink.{0 0} C,
exact has_limits_of_shape_of_equivalence (fin_category.equiv_as_type J) }⟩
/-- If `C` has all limits, it has finite limits. -/
@[priority 100]
instance has_finite_limits_of_has_limits [has_limits C] : has_finite_limits C :=
infer_instance
/-- We can always derive `has_finite_limits C` by providing limits at an
arbitrary universe. -/
lemma has_finite_limits_of_has_finite_limits_of_size
(h : ∀ (J : Type w) {𝒥 : small_category J} (hJ : @fin_category J 𝒥),
by { resetI, exact has_limits_of_shape J C }) :
has_finite_limits C :=
⟨λ J hJ hhJ,
begin
resetI,
letI : category.{w w} (ulift_hom.{w} (ulift.{w 0} J)),
{ apply ulift_hom.category.{0}, exact category_theory.ulift_category J },
haveI := h (ulift_hom.{w} (ulift.{w} J)) category_theory.fin_category_ulift,
exact has_limits_of_shape_of_equivalence (ulift_hom_ulift_category.equiv.{w w} J).symm
end ⟩
/--
A category has all finite colimits if every functor `J ⥤ C` with a `fin_category J`
instance and `J : Type` has a colimit.
This is often called 'finitely cocomplete'.
-/
class has_finite_colimits : Prop :=
(out (J : Type) [𝒥 : small_category J] [@fin_category J 𝒥] : @has_colimits_of_shape J 𝒥 C _)
@[priority 100]
instance has_colimits_of_shape_of_has_finite_colimits
(J : Type w) [small_category J] [fin_category J] [has_finite_colimits C] :
has_colimits_of_shape J C :=
begin
apply has_colimits_of_shape_of_equivalence (fin_category.equiv_as_type J),
apply has_finite_colimits.out
end
@[priority 100]
instance has_finite_colimits_of_has_colimits_of_size [has_colimits_of_size.{v' u'} C] :
has_finite_colimits C :=
⟨λ J hJ hJ', by { haveI := has_colimits_of_size_shrink.{0 0} C,
exact has_colimits_of_shape_of_equivalence (fin_category.equiv_as_type J) }⟩
/-- We can always derive `has_finite_colimits C` by providing colimits at an
arbitrary universe. -/
lemma has_finite_colimits_of_has_finite_colimits_of_size
(h : ∀ (J : Type w) {𝒥 : small_category J} (hJ : @fin_category J 𝒥),
by { resetI, exact has_colimits_of_shape J C }) :
has_finite_colimits C :=
⟨λ J hJ hhJ,
begin
resetI,
letI : category.{w w} (ulift_hom.{w} (ulift.{w 0} J)),
{ apply ulift_hom.category.{0}, exact category_theory.ulift_category J },
haveI := h (ulift_hom.{w} (ulift.{w} J)) category_theory.fin_category_ulift,
exact has_colimits_of_shape_of_equivalence (ulift_hom_ulift_category.equiv.{w w} J).symm
end ⟩
section
open walking_parallel_pair walking_parallel_pair_hom
instance fintype_walking_parallel_pair : fintype walking_parallel_pair :=
{ elems := [walking_parallel_pair.zero, walking_parallel_pair.one].to_finset,
complete := λ x, by { cases x; simp } }
local attribute [tidy] tactic.case_bash
instance (j j' : walking_parallel_pair) : fintype (walking_parallel_pair_hom j j') :=
{ elems := walking_parallel_pair.rec_on j
(walking_parallel_pair.rec_on j' [walking_parallel_pair_hom.id zero].to_finset
[left, right].to_finset)
(walking_parallel_pair.rec_on j' ∅ [walking_parallel_pair_hom.id one].to_finset),
complete := by tidy }
end
instance : fin_category walking_parallel_pair := { }
/-- Equalizers are finite limits, so if `C` has all finite limits, it also has all equalizers -/
example [has_finite_limits C] : has_equalizers C := by apply_instance
/-- Coequalizers are finite colimits, of if `C` has all finite colimits, it also has all
coequalizers -/
example [has_finite_colimits C] : has_coequalizers C := by apply_instance
variables {J : Type v}
local attribute [tidy] tactic.case_bash
namespace wide_pullback_shape
instance fintype_obj [fintype J] : fintype (wide_pullback_shape J) :=
by { rw wide_pullback_shape, apply_instance }
instance fintype_hom (j j' : wide_pullback_shape J) : fintype (j ⟶ j') :=
{ elems :=
begin
cases j',
{ cases j,
{ exact {hom.id none} },
{ exact {hom.term j} } },
{ by_cases some j' = j,
{ rw h,
exact {hom.id j} },
{ exact ∅ } }
end,
complete := by tidy }
end wide_pullback_shape
namespace wide_pushout_shape
instance fintype_obj [fintype J] : fintype (wide_pushout_shape J) :=
by { rw wide_pushout_shape, apply_instance }
instance fintype_hom (j j' : wide_pushout_shape J) : fintype (j ⟶ j') :=
{ elems :=
begin
cases j,
{ cases j',
{ exact {hom.id none} },
{ exact {hom.init j'} } },
{ by_cases some j = j',
{ rw h,
exact {hom.id j'} },
{ exact ∅ } }
end,
complete := by tidy }
end wide_pushout_shape
instance fin_category_wide_pullback [fintype J] : fin_category (wide_pullback_shape J) :=
{ fintype_hom := wide_pullback_shape.fintype_hom }
instance fin_category_wide_pushout [fintype J] :
fin_category (wide_pushout_shape J) :=
{ fintype_hom := wide_pushout_shape.fintype_hom }
/--
`has_finite_wide_pullbacks` represents a choice of wide pullback
for every finite collection of morphisms
-/
-- We can't just made this an `abbreviation`
-- because of https://github.com/leanprover-community/lean/issues/429
class has_finite_wide_pullbacks : Prop :=
(out (J : Type) [fintype J] : has_limits_of_shape (wide_pullback_shape J) C)
instance has_limits_of_shape_wide_pullback_shape
(J : Type) [finite J] [has_finite_wide_pullbacks C] :
has_limits_of_shape (wide_pullback_shape J) C :=
by { casesI nonempty_fintype J, haveI := @has_finite_wide_pullbacks.out C _ _ J, apply_instance }
/--
`has_finite_wide_pushouts` represents a choice of wide pushout
for every finite collection of morphisms
-/
class has_finite_wide_pushouts : Prop :=
(out (J : Type) [fintype J] : has_colimits_of_shape (wide_pushout_shape J) C)
instance has_colimits_of_shape_wide_pushout_shape
(J : Type) [finite J] [has_finite_wide_pushouts C] :
has_colimits_of_shape (wide_pushout_shape J) C :=
by { casesI nonempty_fintype J, haveI := @has_finite_wide_pushouts.out C _ _ J, apply_instance }
/--
Finite wide pullbacks are finite limits, so if `C` has all finite limits,
it also has finite wide pullbacks
-/
lemma has_finite_wide_pullbacks_of_has_finite_limits [has_finite_limits C] :
has_finite_wide_pullbacks C :=
⟨λ J _, by exactI has_finite_limits.out _⟩
/--
Finite wide pushouts are finite colimits, so if `C` has all finite colimits,
it also has finite wide pushouts
-/
lemma has_finite_wide_pushouts_of_has_finite_limits [has_finite_colimits C] :
has_finite_wide_pushouts C :=
⟨λ J _, by exactI has_finite_colimits.out _⟩
instance fintype_walking_pair : fintype walking_pair :=
{ elems := {walking_pair.left, walking_pair.right},
complete := λ x, by { cases x; simp } }
/-- Pullbacks are finite limits, so if `C` has all finite limits, it also has all pullbacks -/
example [has_finite_wide_pullbacks C] : has_pullbacks C := by apply_instance
/-- Pushouts are finite colimits, so if `C` has all finite colimits, it also has all pushouts -/
example [has_finite_wide_pushouts C] : has_pushouts C := by apply_instance
end category_theory.limits
|
31369b8401d52f9d8667a18986516085bca902b0 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/run/balg.lean | d91cd224167f98e4a86036fd5b4447a5b3938e58 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,471 | lean | import Lean
universe u
structure Magma where
α : Type u
mul : α → α → α
instance : CoeSort Magma (Type u) where
coe s := s.α
abbrev mul {M : Magma} (a b : M) : M :=
M.mul a b
set_option pp.all true
infixl:70 (priority := high) "*" => mul
structure Semigroup extends Magma where
mul_assoc (a b c : α) : a * b * c = a * (b * c)
instance : CoeSort Semigroup (Type u) where
coe s := s.α
structure CommSemigroup extends Semigroup where
mul_comm (a b : α) : a * b = b * a
structure Monoid extends Semigroup where
one : α
one_mul (a : α) : one * a = a
mul_one (a : α) : a * one = a
instance : CoeSort Monoid (Type u) where
coe s := s.α
structure CommMonoid extends Monoid where
mul_comm (a b : α) : a * b = b * a
instance : Coe CommMonoid CommSemigroup where
coe s := {
α := s.α
mul := s.mul
mul_assoc := s.mul_assoc
mul_comm := s.mul_comm
}
structure Group extends Monoid where
inv : α → α
mul_left_inv (a : α) : (inv a) * a = one
instance : CoeSort Group (Type u) where
coe s := s.α
abbrev inv {G : Group} (a : G) : G :=
G.inv a
postfix:max "⁻¹" => inv
instance (G : Group) : OfNat (CoeSort.coe G.toMagma) (nat_lit 1) where
ofNat := G.one
instance (G : Group) : OfNat (G.toMagma.α) (nat_lit 1) where
ofNat := G.one
structure CommGroup extends Group where
mul_comm (a b : α) : a * b = b * a
instance : CoeSort CommGroup (Type u) where
coe s := s.α
theorem inv_mul_cancel_left {G : Group} (a b : G) : a⁻¹ * (a * b) = b := by
rw [← G.mul_assoc, G.mul_left_inv, G.one_mul]
theorem toMonoidOneEq {G : Group} : G.toMonoid.one = 1 :=
rfl
theorem inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one {G : Group} {a b : G} (h : a * b = 1) : a⁻¹ = b := by
rw [← G.mul_one a⁻¹, toMonoidOneEq, ←h, ← G.mul_assoc, G.mul_left_inv, G.one_mul]
theorem inv_inv {G : Group} (a : G) : (a⁻¹)⁻¹ = a :=
inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one (G.mul_left_inv a)
theorem mul_right_inv {G : Group} (a : G) : a * a⁻¹ = 1 := by
have : a⁻¹⁻¹ * a⁻¹ = 1 := by rw [G.mul_left_inv]; rfl
rw [inv_inv] at this
assumption
unif_hint (G : Group) where
|- G.toMonoid.one =?= 1
theorem mul_inv_rev {G : Group} (a b : G) : (a * b)⁻¹ = b⁻¹ * a⁻¹ := by
apply inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one
rw [G.mul_assoc, ← G.mul_assoc b, mul_right_inv, G.one_mul, mul_right_inv]
theorem mul_inv {G : CommGroup} (a b : G) : (a * b)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ * b⁻¹ := by
rw [mul_inv_rev, G.mul_comm]
|
187b3a14acd6320250e7fcbcf786aa791a7bb364 | 54d7e71c3616d331b2ec3845d31deb08f3ff1dea | /library/init/category/alternative.lean | c34d46d9b4b888691468356732fbbf8eb07436ee | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | pachugupta/lean | 6f3305c4292288311cc4ab4550060b17d49ffb1d | 0d02136a09ac4cf27b5c88361750e38e1f485a1a | refs/heads/master | 1,611,110,653,606 | 1,493,130,117,000 | 1,493,167,649,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,095 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import init.logic init.category.applicative
universes u v
class alternative (f : Type u → Type v) extends applicative f : Type (max u+1 v) :=
(failure : Π {α : Type u}, f α)
(orelse : Π {α : Type u}, f α → f α → f α)
section
variables {f : Type u → Type v} [alternative f] {α : Type u}
@[inline] def failure : f α :=
alternative.failure f
@[inline] def orelse : f α → f α → f α :=
alternative.orelse
infixr ` <|> `:2 := orelse
@[inline] def guard {f : Type → Type v} [alternative f] (p : Prop) [decidable p] : f unit :=
if p then pure () else failure
/- Later we define a coercion from bool to Prop, but this version will still be useful.
Given (t : tactic bool), we can write t >>= guardb -/
@[inline] def guardb {f : Type → Type v} [alternative f] : bool → f unit
| tt := pure ()
| ff := failure
@[inline] def optional (x : f α) : f (option α) :=
some <$> x <|> pure none
end
|
58b20fd82ca164ec1a890825674e86bacd987951 | a9d0fb7b0e4f802bd3857b803e6c5c23d87fef91 | /library/data/nat/div.lean | 0730f629c50961b179967c3a0e6df859fc1d2ccd | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean-osx | 4a954262c780e404c1369d6c06516161d07fcb40 | 3670278342d2f4faa49d95b46d86642d7875b47c | refs/heads/master | 1,611,410,334,552 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 12,043,103 | 5 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 27,204 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
Definitions and properties of div and mod. Much of the development follows Isabelle's library.
-/
import .sub
open well_founded decidable prod
namespace nat
/- div -/
-- auxiliary lemma used to justify div
private definition div_rec_lemma {x y : nat} : 0 < y ∧ y ≤ x → x - y < x :=
and.rec (λ ypos ylex, sub_lt (lt_of_lt_of_le ypos ylex) ypos)
private definition div.F (x : nat) (f : Π x₁, x₁ < x → nat → nat) (y : nat) : nat :=
if H : 0 < y ∧ y ≤ x then f (x - y) (div_rec_lemma H) y + 1 else zero
protected definition div := fix lt_wf div.F
definition nat_has_divide : has_div nat :=
has_div.mk nat.div
local attribute [instance] nat_has_divide
theorem div_def (x y : nat) : div x y = if 0 < y ∧ y ≤ x then div (x - y) y + 1 else 0 :=
congr_fun (fix_eq lt_wf div.F x) y
attribute [simp]
protected theorem div_zero (a : ℕ) : a / 0 = 0 :=
eq.trans (div_def a 0) $ if_neg (not_and_of_not_left (0 ≤ a) (lt.irrefl 0))
theorem div_eq_zero_of_lt {a b : ℕ} (h : a < b) : a / b = 0 :=
eq.trans (div_def a b) $ if_neg (not_and_of_not_right (0 < b) (not_le_of_gt h))
attribute [simp]
protected theorem zero_div (b : ℕ) : 0 / b = 0 :=
eq.trans (div_def 0 b) $ if_neg (and.rec not_le_of_gt)
theorem div_eq_succ_sub_div {a b : ℕ} (h₁ : b > 0) (h₂ : a ≥ b) : a / b = succ ((a - b) / b) :=
eq.trans (div_def a b) $ if_pos (and.intro h₁ h₂)
theorem add_div_self (x : ℕ) {z : ℕ} (H : z > 0) : (x + z) / z = succ (x / z) :=
sorry
/-
calc
(x + z) / z = if 0 < z ∧ z ≤ x + z then (x + z - z) / z + 1 else 0 : !div_def
... = (x + z - z) / z + 1 : if_pos (and.intro H (le_add_left z x))
... = succ (x / z) : by rewrite nat.add_sub_cancel
-/
theorem add_div_self_left {x : ℕ} (z : ℕ) (H : x > 0) : (x + z) / x = succ (z / x) :=
add.comm z x ▸ add_div_self z H
local attribute succ_mul [simp]
theorem add_mul_div_self {x y z : ℕ} (H : z > 0) : (x + y * z) / z = x / z + y :=
sorry
/-
nat.induction_on y
(by simp)
(take y,
assume IH : (x + y * z) / z = x / z + y, calc
(x + succ y * z) / z = (x + y * z + z) / z : by inst_simp
... = succ ((x + y * z) / z) : !add_div_self H
... = succ (x / z + y) : by rewrite IH)
-/
theorem add_mul_div_self_left (x z : ℕ) {y : ℕ} (H : y > 0) : (x + y * z) / y = x / y + z :=
mul.comm z y ▸ add_mul_div_self H
protected theorem mul_div_cancel (m : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (H : n > 0) : m * n / n = m :=
sorry
/-
calc
m * n / n = (0 + m * n) / n : by simp
... = 0 / n + m : add_mul_div_self H
... = m : by simp
-/
protected theorem mul_div_cancel_left {m : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (H : m > 0) : m * n / m = n :=
mul.comm n m ▸ nat.mul_div_cancel n H
/- mod -/
private definition mod.F (x : nat) (f : Π x₁, x₁ < x → nat → nat) (y : nat) : nat :=
if H : 0 < y ∧ y ≤ x then f (x - y) (div_rec_lemma H) y else x
protected definition mod := fix lt_wf mod.F
definition nat_has_mod : has_mod nat :=
has_mod.mk nat.mod
local attribute [instance] nat_has_mod
notation [priority nat.prio] a ≡ b `[mod `:0 c:0 `]` := a % c = b % c
theorem mod_def (x y : nat) : mod x y = if 0 < y ∧ y ≤ x then mod (x - y) y else x :=
congr_fun (fix_eq lt_wf mod.F x) y
attribute [simp]
theorem mod_zero (a : ℕ) : a % 0 = a :=
eq.trans (mod_def a 0) $ if_neg (not_and_of_not_left (0 ≤ a) (lt.irrefl 0))
theorem mod_eq_of_lt {a b : ℕ} (h : a < b) : a % b = a :=
eq.trans (mod_def a b) $ if_neg (not_and_of_not_right (0 < b) (not_le_of_gt h))
attribute [simp]
theorem zero_mod (b : ℕ) : 0 % b = 0 :=
eq.trans (mod_def 0 b) $ if_neg (λ h, and.rec_on h (λ l r, absurd (lt_of_lt_of_le l r) (lt.irrefl 0)))
theorem mod_eq_sub_mod {a b : ℕ} (h₁ : b > 0) (h₂ : a ≥ b) : a % b = (a - b) % b :=
eq.trans (mod_def a b) $ if_pos (and.intro h₁ h₂)
attribute [simp]
theorem add_mod_self (x z : ℕ) : (x + z) % z = x % z :=
sorry
/-
by_cases_zero_pos z
(by rewrite add_zero)
(take z, assume H : z > 0,
calc
(x + z) % z = if 0 < z ∧ z ≤ x + z then (x + z - z) % z else _ : !mod_def
... = (x + z - z) % z : if_pos (and.intro H (le_add_left z x))
... = x % z : by rewrite nat.add_sub_cancel)
-/
attribute [simp]
theorem add_mod_self_left (x z : ℕ) : (x + z) % x = z % x :=
add.comm z x ▸ add_mod_self z x
local attribute succ_mul [simp]
attribute [simp]
theorem add_mul_mod_self (x y z : ℕ) : (x + y * z) % z = x % z :=
sorry -- nat.induction_on y (by simp) (by inst_simp)
attribute [simp]
theorem add_mul_mod_self_left (x y z : ℕ) : (x + y * z) % y = x % y :=
sorry -- by inst_simp
attribute [simp]
theorem mul_mod_left (m n : ℕ) : (m * n) % n = 0 :=
sorry
/-
calc (m * n) % n = (0 + m * n) % n : by simp
... = 0 : by inst_simp
-/
attribute [simp]
theorem mul_mod_right (m n : ℕ) : (m * n) % m = 0 :=
sorry -- by inst_simp
theorem mod_lt (x : ℕ) {y : ℕ} (H : y > 0) : x % y < y :=
nat.case_strong_induction_on x
(show 0 % y < y, from eq.symm (zero_mod y) ▸ H)
(take x,
assume IH : ∀x', x' ≤ x → x' % y < y,
show succ x % y < y, from
by_cases -- (succ x < y)
(assume H1 : succ x < y,
have succ x % y = succ x, from mod_eq_of_lt H1,
show succ x % y < y, from eq.symm this ▸ H1)
(assume H1 : ¬ succ x < y,
have y ≤ succ x, from le_of_not_gt H1,
have h : succ x % y = (succ x - y) % y, from mod_eq_sub_mod H this,
have succ x - y < succ x, from sub_lt (succ_pos x) H,
have succ x - y ≤ x, from le_of_lt_succ this,
show succ x % y < y, from eq.symm h ▸ IH _ this))
theorem mod_one (n : ℕ) : n % 1 = 0 :=
have H1 : n % 1 < 1, from (mod_lt n) (succ_pos 0),
eq_zero_of_le_zero (le_of_lt_succ H1)
/- properties of div and mod -/
-- the quotient - remainder theorem
theorem eq_div_mul_add_mod (x y : ℕ) : x = x / y * y + x % y :=
sorry
/-
begin
eapply by_cases_zero_pos y,
show x = x / 0 * 0 + x % 0, from
(calc
x / 0 * 0 + x % 0 = 0 + x % 0 : by rewrite mul_zero
... = x % 0 : by rewrite zero_add
... = x : by rewrite mod_zero)⁻¹,
intro y H,
show x = x / y * y + x % y,
begin
eapply nat.case_strong_induction_on x,
show 0 = (0 / y) * y + 0 % y, by rewrite [zero_mod, add_zero, nat.zero_div, zero_mul],
intro x IH,
show succ x = succ x / y * y + succ x % y, from
if H1 : succ x < y then
have H2 : succ x / y = 0, from div_eq_zero_of_lt H1,
have H3 : succ x % y = succ x, from mod_eq_of_lt H1,
begin rewrite [H2, H3, zero_mul, zero_add] end
else
have H2 : y ≤ succ x, from le_of_not_gt H1,
have H3 : succ x / y = succ ((succ x - y) / y), from div_eq_succ_sub_div H H2,
have H4 : succ x % y = (succ x - y) % y, from mod_eq_sub_mod H H2,
have H5 : succ x - y < succ x, from sub_lt !succ_pos H,
have H6 : succ x - y ≤ x, from le_of_lt_succ H5,
(calc
succ x / y * y + succ x % y =
succ ((succ x - y) / y) * y + succ x % y : by rewrite H3
... = ((succ x - y) / y) * y + y + succ x % y : by rewrite succ_mul
... = ((succ x - y) / y) * y + y + (succ x - y) % y : by rewrite H4
... = ((succ x - y) / y) * y + (succ x - y) % y + y : by rewrite add.right_comm
... = succ x - y + y : by rewrite -(IH _ H6)
... = succ x : nat.sub_add_cancel H2)⁻¹
end
end
-/
theorem mod_eq_sub_div_mul (x y : ℕ) : x % y = x - x / y * y :=
nat.eq_sub_of_add_eq (eq.symm (add.comm (x / y * y) (x % y) ▸ eq_div_mul_add_mod x y))
theorem mod_add_mod (m n k : ℕ) : (m % n + k) % n = (m + k) % n :=
sorry -- by rewrite [eq_div_mul_add_mod m n at {2}, add.assoc, add.comm (m / n * n), add_mul_mod_self]
theorem add_mod_mod (m n k : ℕ) : (m + n % k) % k = (m + n) % k :=
sorry -- by rewrite [add.comm, mod_add_mod, add.comm]
theorem add_mod_eq_add_mod_right {m n k : ℕ} (i : ℕ) (H : m % n = k % n) :
(m + i) % n = (k + i) % n :=
sorry -- by rewrite [-mod_add_mod, -mod_add_mod k, H]
theorem add_mod_eq_add_mod_left {m n k : ℕ} (i : ℕ) (H : m % n = k % n) :
(i + m) % n = (i + k) % n :=
sorry -- by rewrite [add.comm, add_mod_eq_add_mod_right _ H, add.comm]
theorem mod_eq_mod_of_add_mod_eq_add_mod_right {m n k i : ℕ} :
(m + i) % n = (k + i) % n → m % n = k % n :=
sorry
/-
by_cases_zero_pos n
(by rewrite [*mod_zero]; apply eq_of_add_eq_add_right)
(take n,
assume npos : n > 0,
assume H1 : (m + i) % n = (k + i) % n,
have H2 : (m + i % n) % n = (k + i % n) % n, by rewrite [*add_mod_mod, H1],
have H3 : (m + i % n + (n - i % n)) % n = (k + i % n + (n - i % n)) % n,
from add_mod_eq_add_mod_right _ H2,
begin
revert H3,
rewrite [*add.assoc, add_sub_of_le (le_of_lt (!mod_lt npos)), *add_mod_self],
intros, assumption
end)
-/
theorem mod_eq_mod_of_add_mod_eq_add_mod_left {m n k i : ℕ} :
(i + m) % n = (i + k) % n → m % n = k % n :=
sorry -- by rewrite [add.comm i m, add.comm i k]; apply mod_eq_mod_of_add_mod_eq_add_mod_right
theorem mod_le {x y : ℕ} : x % y ≤ x :=
eq.symm (eq_div_mul_add_mod x y) ▸ le_add_left (x % y) (x / y * y)
theorem eq_remainder {q1 r1 q2 r2 y : ℕ} (H1 : r1 < y) (H2 : r2 < y)
(H3 : q1 * y + r1 = q2 * y + r2) : r1 = r2 :=
sorry
/-
calc
r1 = r1 % y : eq.symm (mod_eq_of_lt H1)
... = (r1 + q1 * y) % y : !add_mul_mod_self⁻¹
... = (q1 * y + r1) % y : by rewrite add.comm
... = (r2 + q2 * y) % y : by rewrite [H3, add.comm]
... = r2 % y : !add_mul_mod_self
... = r2 : mod_eq_of_lt H2
-/
theorem eq_quotient {q1 r1 q2 r2 y : ℕ} (H1 : r1 < y) (H2 : r2 < y)
(H3 : q1 * y + r1 = q2 * y + r2) : q1 = q2 :=
have H4 : q1 * y + r2 = q2 * y + r2, from (eq_remainder H1 H2 H3) ▸ H3,
have H5 : q1 * y = q2 * y, from add.right_cancel H4,
have H6 : y > 0, from lt_of_le_of_lt (zero_le r1) H1,
show q1 = q2, from eq_of_mul_eq_mul_right H6 H5
protected theorem mul_div_mul_left {z : ℕ} (x y : ℕ) (zpos : z > 0) :
(z * x) / (z * y) = x / y :=
sorry
/-
if H : y = 0 then
by rewrite [H, mul_zero, *nat.div_zero]
else
have ypos : y > 0, from pos_of_ne_zero H,
have zypos : z * y > 0, from mul_pos zpos ypos,
have H1 : (z * x) % (z * y) < z * y, from !mod_lt zypos,
have H2 : z * (x % y) < z * y, from mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left (!mod_lt ypos) zpos,
eq_quotient H1 H2
(calc
((z * x) / (z * y)) * (z * y) + (z * x) % (z * y) = z * x : by rewrite -eq_div_mul_add_mod
... = z * (x / y * y + x % y) : by rewrite -eq_div_mul_add_mod
... = z * (x / y * y) + z * (x % y) : !left_distrib
... = (x / y) * (z * y) + z * (x % y) : by rewrite mul.left_comm)
-/
protected theorem mul_div_mul_right {x z y : ℕ} (zpos : z > 0) : (x * z) / (y * z) = x / y :=
mul.comm z y ▸ mul.comm z x ▸ nat.mul_div_mul_left x y zpos
theorem mul_mod_mul_left (z x y : ℕ) : (z * x) % (z * y) = z * (x % y) :=
sorry
/-
or.elim (eq_zero_or_pos z)
(assume H : z = 0, H⁻¹ ▸ calc
(0 * x) % (z * y) = 0 % (z * y) : by rewrite zero_mul
... = 0 : by rewrite zero_mod
... = 0 * (x % y) : by rewrite zero_mul)
(assume zpos : z > 0,
or.elim (eq_zero_or_pos y)
(assume H : y = 0, by rewrite [H, mul_zero, *mod_zero])
(assume ypos : y > 0,
have zypos : z * y > 0, from mul_pos zpos ypos,
have H1 : (z * x) % (z * y) < z * y, from !mod_lt zypos,
have H2 : z * (x % y) < z * y, from mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left (!mod_lt ypos) zpos,
eq_remainder H1 H2
(calc
((z * x) / (z * y)) * (z * y) + (z * x) % (z * y) = z * x : by rewrite -eq_div_mul_add_mod
... = z * (x / y * y + x % y) : by rewrite -eq_div_mul_add_mod
... = z * (x / y * y) + z * (x % y) : by rewrite left_distrib
... = (x / y) * (z * y) + z * (x % y) : by rewrite mul.left_comm)))
-/
theorem mul_mod_mul_right (x z y : ℕ) : (x * z) % (y * z) = (x % y) * z :=
mul.comm z x ▸ mul.comm z y ▸ mul.comm z (x % y) ▸ mul_mod_mul_left z x y
theorem mod_self (n : ℕ) : n % n = 0 :=
sorry
/-
nat.cases_on n (by rewrite zero_mod)
(take n, by rewrite [-zero_add (succ n) at {1}, add_mod_self])
-/
theorem mul_mod_eq_mod_mul_mod (m n k : nat) : (m * n) % k = ((m % k) * n) % k :=
sorry
/-
calc
(m * n) % k = (((m / k) * k + m % k) * n) % k : by rewrite -eq_div_mul_add_mod
... = ((m % k) * n) % k :
by rewrite [right_distrib, mul.right_comm, add.comm, add_mul_mod_self]
-/
theorem mul_mod_eq_mul_mod_mod (m n k : nat) : (m * n) % k = (m * (n % k)) % k :=
mul.comm (n % k) m ▸ mul.comm n m ▸ mul_mod_eq_mod_mul_mod n m k
protected theorem div_one (n : ℕ) : n / 1 = n :=
sorry
/-
have n / 1 * 1 + n % 1 = n, from !eq_div_mul_add_mod⁻¹,
begin rewrite [-this at {2}, mul_one, mod_one] end
-/
protected theorem div_self {n : ℕ} (H : n > 0) : n / n = 1 :=
sorry
/-
have (n * 1) / (n * 1) = 1 / 1, from !nat.mul_div_mul_left H,
by rewrite [nat.div_one at this, -this, *mul_one]
-/
theorem div_mul_cancel_of_mod_eq_zero {m n : ℕ} (H : m % n = 0) : m / n * n = m :=
sorry -- by rewrite [eq_div_mul_add_mod m n at {2}, H, add_zero]
theorem mul_div_cancel_of_mod_eq_zero {m n : ℕ} (H : m % n = 0) : n * (m / n) = m :=
mul.comm (m / n) n ▸ div_mul_cancel_of_mod_eq_zero H
/- dvd -/
theorem dvd_of_mod_eq_zero {m n : ℕ} (H : n % m = 0) : m ∣ n :=
dvd.intro (mul.comm (n / m) m ▸ div_mul_cancel_of_mod_eq_zero H)
theorem mod_eq_zero_of_dvd {m n : ℕ} (H : m ∣ n) : n % m = 0 :=
dvd.elim H (take z, assume H1 : n = m * z, eq.symm H1 ▸ mul_mod_right m z)
theorem dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero (m n : ℕ) : m ∣ n ↔ n % m = 0 :=
iff.intro mod_eq_zero_of_dvd dvd_of_mod_eq_zero
definition dvd.decidable_rel : decidable_rel dvd :=
take m n, decidable_of_decidable_of_iff _ (iff.symm $ dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero m n)
protected theorem div_mul_cancel {m n : ℕ} (H : n ∣ m) : m / n * n = m :=
div_mul_cancel_of_mod_eq_zero (mod_eq_zero_of_dvd H)
protected theorem mul_div_cancel' {m n : ℕ} (H : n ∣ m) : n * (m / n) = m :=
mul.comm (m / n) n ▸ nat.div_mul_cancel H
theorem dvd_of_dvd_add_left {m n₁ n₂ : ℕ} (H₁ : m ∣ n₁ + n₂) (H₂ : m ∣ n₁) : m ∣ n₂ :=
sorry
/-
obtain (c₁ : nat) (Hc₁ : n₁ + n₂ = m * c₁), from H₁,
obtain (c₂ : nat) (Hc₂ : n₁ = m * c₂), from H₂,
have aux : m * (c₁ - c₂) = n₂, from calc
m * (c₁ - c₂) = m * c₁ - m * c₂ : !nat.mul_sub_left_distrib
... = n₁ + n₂ - m * c₂ : by rewrite Hc₁
... = n₁ + n₂ - n₁ : by rewrite Hc₂
... = n₂ : !nat.add_sub_cancel_left,
dvd.intro aux
-/
theorem dvd_of_dvd_add_right {m n₁ n₂ : ℕ} (H : m ∣ n₁ + n₂) : m ∣ n₂ → m ∣ n₁ :=
nat.dvd_of_dvd_add_left (add.comm n₁ n₂ ▸ H)
theorem dvd_sub {m n₁ n₂ : ℕ} (H1 : m ∣ n₁) (H2 : m ∣ n₂) : m ∣ n₁ - n₂ :=
by_cases
(assume H3 : n₁ ≥ n₂,
have H4 : n₁ = n₁ - n₂ + n₂, from eq.symm (nat.sub_add_cancel H3),
show m ∣ n₁ - n₂, from nat.dvd_of_dvd_add_right (H4 ▸ H1) H2)
(assume H3 : ¬ (n₁ ≥ n₂),
have H4 : n₁ - n₂ = 0, from sub_eq_zero_of_le (le_of_lt (lt_of_not_ge H3)),
show m ∣ n₁ - n₂, from eq.symm H4 ▸ dvd_zero _)
theorem dvd.antisymm {m n : ℕ} : m ∣ n → n ∣ m → m = n :=
sorry
/-
by_cases_zero_pos n
(assume H1, assume H2 : 0 ∣ m, eq_zero_of_zero_dvd H2)
(take n,
assume Hpos : n > 0,
assume H1 : m ∣ n,
assume H2 : n ∣ m,
obtain k (Hk : n = m * k), from exists_eq_mul_right_of_dvd H1,
obtain l (Hl : m = n * l), from exists_eq_mul_right_of_dvd H2,
have n * (l * k) = n, from !mul.assoc ▸ Hl ▸ Hk⁻¹,
have l * k = 1, from eq_one_of_mul_eq_self_right Hpos this,
have k = 1, from eq_one_of_mul_eq_one_left this,
show m = n, from (mul_one m)⁻¹ ⬝ (this ▸ Hk⁻¹))
-/
protected theorem mul_div_assoc (m : ℕ) {n k : ℕ} (H : k ∣ n) : m * n / k = m * (n / k) :=
sorry
/-
or.elim (eq_zero_or_pos k)
(assume H1 : k = 0,
calc
m * n / k = m * n / 0 : by rewrite H1
... = 0 : by rewrite nat.div_zero
... = m * 0 : mul_zero m
... = m * (n / 0) : by rewrite nat.div_zero
... = m * (n / k) : by rewrite H1)
(assume H1 : k > 0,
have H2 : n = n / k * k, from (nat.div_mul_cancel H)⁻¹,
calc
m * n / k = m * (n / k * k) / k : by rewrite -H2
... = m * (n / k) * k / k : by rewrite mul.assoc
... = m * (n / k) : nat.mul_div_cancel _ H1)
-/
theorem dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_left {m n k : ℕ} (kpos : k > 0) (H : k * m ∣ k * n) : m ∣ n :=
dvd.elim H
(take l,
assume H1 : k * n = k * m * l,
have H2 : n = m * l, from eq_of_mul_eq_mul_left kpos (eq.trans H1 $ mul.assoc k m l),
dvd.intro (eq.symm H2))
theorem dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_right {m n k : ℕ} (kpos : k > 0) (H : m * k ∣ n * k) : m ∣ n :=
nat.dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_left kpos (mul.comm n k ▸ mul.comm m k ▸ H)
lemma dvd_of_eq_mul (i j n : nat) : n = j*i → j ∣ n :=
sorry -- begin intros, subst n, apply dvd_mul_right end
theorem div_dvd_div {k m n : ℕ} (H1 : k ∣ m) (H2 : m ∣ n) : m / k ∣ n / k :=
have H3 : m = m / k * k, from eq.symm (nat.div_mul_cancel H1),
have H4 : n = n / k * k, from eq.symm (nat.div_mul_cancel (dvd.trans H1 H2)),
or.elim (eq_zero_or_pos k)
(assume H5 : k = 0,
have H6: n / k = 0, from (eq.trans (congr_arg _ H5) $ nat.div_zero n),
eq.symm H6 ▸ dvd_zero (m / k))
(assume H5 : k > 0,
nat.dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_right H5 (H3 ▸ H4 ▸ H2))
protected theorem div_eq_iff_eq_mul_right {m n : ℕ} (k : ℕ) (H : n > 0) (H' : n ∣ m) :
m / n = k ↔ m = n * k :=
sorry
/-
iff.intro
(assume H1, by rewrite [-H1, nat.mul_div_cancel' H'])
(assume H1, by rewrite [H1, !nat.mul_div_cancel_left H])
-/
protected theorem div_eq_iff_eq_mul_left {m n : ℕ} (k : ℕ) (H : n > 0) (H' : n ∣ m) :
m / n = k ↔ m = k * n :=
mul.comm n k ▸ nat.div_eq_iff_eq_mul_right k H H'
protected theorem eq_mul_of_div_eq_right {m n k : ℕ} (H1 : n ∣ m) (H2 : m / n = k) :
m = n * k :=
sorry
/-
calc
m = n * (m / n) : by rewrite (nat.mul_div_cancel' H1)
... = n * k : by rewrite H2
-/
protected theorem div_eq_of_eq_mul_right {m n k : ℕ} (H1 : n > 0) (H2 : m = n * k) :
m / n = k :=
sorry
/-
calc
m / n = n * k / n : by rewrite -H2
... = k : by rewrite (!nat.mul_div_cancel_left H1)
-/
protected theorem eq_mul_of_div_eq_left {m n k : ℕ} (H1 : n ∣ m) (H2 : m / n = k) :
m = k * n :=
mul.comm n k ▸ nat.eq_mul_of_div_eq_right H1 H2
protected theorem div_eq_of_eq_mul_left {m n k : ℕ} (H1 : n > 0) (H2 : m = k * n) :
m / n = k :=
nat.div_eq_of_eq_mul_right H1 (mul.comm k n ▸ H2)
lemma add_mod_eq_of_dvd (i j n : nat) : n ∣ j → (i + j) % n = i % n :=
sorry
/-
assume h,
obtain k (hk : j = n * k), from exists_eq_mul_right_of_dvd h,
begin
subst j, rewrite mul.comm,
apply add_mul_mod_self
end
-/
/- / and ordering -/
lemma le_of_dvd {m n : nat} : n > 0 → m ∣ n → m ≤ n :=
sorry
/-
assume (h₁ : n > 0) (h₂ : m ∣ n),
have h₃ : n % m = 0, from mod_eq_zero_of_dvd h₂,
by_contradiction
(λ nle : ¬ m ≤ n,
have h₄ : m > n, from lt_of_not_ge nle,
have h₅ : n % m = n, from mod_eq_of_lt h₄,
begin
rewrite h₃ at h₅, subst n,
exact absurd h₁ (lt.irrefl 0)
end)
-/
theorem div_mul_le (m n : ℕ) : m / n * n ≤ m :=
sorry
/-
calc
m = m / n * n + m % n : by rewrite -eq_div_mul_add_mod
... ≥ m / n * n : !le_add_right
-/
protected theorem div_le_of_le_mul {m n k : ℕ} (H : m ≤ n * k) : m / k ≤ n :=
sorry
/-
or.elim (eq_zero_or_pos k)
(assume H1 : k = 0,
calc
m / k = m / 0 : by rewrite H1
... = 0 : by rewrite nat.div_zero
... ≤ n : !zero_le)
(assume H1 : k > 0,
le_of_mul_le_mul_right (calc
m / k * k ≤ m / k * k + m % k : !le_add_right
... = m : by rewrite -eq_div_mul_add_mod
... ≤ n * k : H) H1)
-/
protected theorem div_le_self (m n : ℕ) : m / n ≤ m :=
sorry
/-
nat.cases_on n (!nat.div_zero⁻¹ ▸ !zero_le)
take n,
have H : m ≤ m * succ n, from calc
m = m * 1 : by rewrite mul_one
... ≤ m * succ n : !mul_le_mul_left (succ_le_succ !zero_le),
nat.div_le_of_le_mul H
-/
protected theorem mul_le_of_le_div {m n k : ℕ} (H : m ≤ n / k) : m * k ≤ n :=
calc
m * k ≤ n / k * k : mul_le_mul_right k H
... ≤ n : div_mul_le n k
protected theorem le_div_of_mul_le {m n k : ℕ} (H1 : k > 0) (H2 : m * k ≤ n) : m ≤ n / k :=
sorry
/-
have H3 : m * k < (succ (n / k)) * k, from
calc
m * k ≤ n : H2
... = n / k * k + n % k : by rewrite -eq_div_mul_add_mod
... < n / k * k + k : add_lt_add_left (!mod_lt H1) _
... = (succ (n / k)) * k : by rewrite succ_mul,
le_of_lt_succ (lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right H3)
-/
protected theorem le_div_iff_mul_le {m n k : ℕ} (H : k > 0) : m ≤ n / k ↔ m * k ≤ n :=
iff.intro nat.mul_le_of_le_div (nat.le_div_of_mul_le H)
protected theorem div_le_div {m n : ℕ} (k : ℕ) (H : m ≤ n) : m / k ≤ n / k :=
sorry
/-
by_cases_zero_pos k
(by rewrite [*nat.div_zero])
(take k, assume H1 : k > 0, nat.le_div_of_mul_le H1 (le.trans !div_mul_le H))
-/
protected theorem div_lt_of_lt_mul {m n k : ℕ} (H : m < n * k) : m / k < n :=
sorry
/-
lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right (calc
m / k * k ≤ m / k * k + m % k : !le_add_right
... = m : by rewrite -eq_div_mul_add_mod
... < n * k : H)
-/
protected theorem lt_mul_of_div_lt {m n k : ℕ} (H1 : k > 0) (H2 : m / k < n) : m < n * k :=
sorry
/-
have H3 : succ (m / k) * k ≤ n * k, from !mul_le_mul_right (succ_le_of_lt H2),
have H4 : m / k * k + k ≤ n * k, by rewrite [succ_mul at H3]; apply H3,
calc
m = m / k * k + m % k : by rewrite -eq_div_mul_add_mod
... < m / k * k + k : add_lt_add_left (!mod_lt H1) _
... ≤ n * k : H4
-/
protected theorem div_lt_iff_lt_mul {m n k : ℕ} (H : k > 0) : m / k < n ↔ m < n * k :=
iff.intro (nat.lt_mul_of_div_lt H) nat.div_lt_of_lt_mul
protected theorem div_le_iff_le_mul_of_div {m n : ℕ} (k : ℕ) (H : n > 0) (H' : n ∣ m) :
m / n ≤ k ↔ m ≤ k * n :=
sorry -- by refine iff.trans (!le_iff_mul_le_mul_right H) _; rewrite [!nat.div_mul_cancel H']
protected theorem le_mul_of_div_le_of_div {m n k : ℕ} (H1 : n > 0) (H2 : n ∣ m) (H3 : m / n ≤ k) :
m ≤ k * n :=
iff.mp (nat.div_le_iff_le_mul_of_div k H1 H2) H3
-- needed for integer division
theorem mul_sub_div_of_lt {m n k : ℕ} (H : k < m * n) :
(m * n - (k + 1)) / m = n - k / m - 1 :=
sorry
/-
begin
have H1 : k / m < n, from nat.div_lt_of_lt_mul (!mul.comm ▸ H),
have H2 : n - k / m ≥ 1, from
nat.le_sub_of_add_le (calc
1 + k / m = succ (k / m) : by rewrite add.comm
... ≤ n : succ_le_of_lt H1),
have H3 : n - k / m = n - k / m - 1 + 1, from (nat.sub_add_cancel H2)⁻¹,
have H4 : m > 0, from pos_of_ne_zero (assume H': m = 0, not_lt_zero k (begin rewrite [H' at H, zero_mul at H], exact H end)),
have H5 : k % m + 1 ≤ m, from succ_le_of_lt (!mod_lt H4),
have H6 : m - (k % m + 1) < m, from nat.sub_lt_self H4 !succ_pos,
calc
(m * n - (k + 1)) / m = (m * n - (k / m * m + k % m + 1)) / m : by rewrite -eq_div_mul_add_mod
... = (m * n - k / m * m - (k % m + 1)) / m : by rewrite [*nat.sub_sub]
... = ((n - k / m) * m - (k % m + 1)) / m :
by rewrite [mul.comm m, nat.mul_sub_right_distrib]
... = ((n - k / m - 1) * m + m - (k % m + 1)) / m :
by rewrite [H3 at {1}, right_distrib, nat.one_mul]
... = ((n - k / m - 1) * m + (m - (k % m + 1))) / m : by rewrite (nat.add_sub_assoc H5 _)
... = (m - (k % m + 1)) / m + (n - k / m - 1) :
by rewrite [add.comm, (add_mul_div_self H4)]
... = n - k / m - 1 :
by rewrite [div_eq_zero_of_lt H6, zero_add]
end
-/
private lemma div_div_aux (a b c : nat) : b > 0 → c > 0 → (a / b) / c = a / (b * c) :=
sorry
/-
suppose b > 0, suppose c > 0,
nat.strong_induction_on a
(λ a ih,
let k₁ := a / (b*c) in
let k₂ := a %(b*c) in
have bc_pos : b*c > 0, from mul_pos `b > 0` `c > 0`,
have k₂ < b * c, from mod_lt _ bc_pos,
have k₂ ≤ a, from !mod_le,
or.elim (eq_or_lt_of_le this)
(suppose k₂ = a,
have i₁ : a < b * c, by rewrite -this; assumption,
have k₁ = 0, from div_eq_zero_of_lt i₁,
have a / b < c, by rewrite [mul.comm at i₁]; exact nat.div_lt_of_lt_mul i₁,
begin
rewrite [`k₁ = 0`],
show (a / b) / c = 0, from div_eq_zero_of_lt `a / b < c`
end)
(suppose k₂ < a,
have a = k₁*(b*c) + k₂, from eq_div_mul_add_mod a (b*c),
have a / b = k₁*c + k₂ / b, by
rewrite [this at {1}, mul.comm b c at {2}, -mul.assoc,
add.comm, add_mul_div_self `b > 0`, add.comm],
have e₁ : (a / b) / c = k₁ + (k₂ / b) / c, by
rewrite [this, add.comm, add_mul_div_self `c > 0`, add.comm],
have e₂ : (k₂ / b) / c = k₂ / (b * c), from ih k₂ `k₂ < a`,
have e₃ : k₂ / (b * c) = 0, from div_eq_zero_of_lt `k₂ < b * c`,
have (k₂ / b) / c = 0, by rewrite [e₂, e₃],
show (a / b) / c = k₁, by rewrite [e₁, this]))
-/
protected lemma div_div_eq_div_mul (a b c : nat) : (a / b) / c = a / (b * c) :=
sorry
/-
begin
cases b with b,
rewrite [zero_mul, *nat.div_zero, nat.zero_div],
cases c with c,
rewrite [mul_zero, *nat.div_zero],
apply div_div_aux a (succ b) (succ c) dec_trivial dec_trivial
end
-/
lemma div_lt_of_ne_zero : ∀ {n : nat}, n ≠ 0 → n / 2 < n
:= sorry
/-
| 0 h := absurd rfl h
| (succ n) h :=
begin
apply nat.div_lt_of_lt_mul,
rewrite [-add_one, right_distrib],
change n + 1 < (n * 1 + n) + (1 + 1),
rewrite [mul_one, -add.assoc],
apply add_lt_add_right,
show n < n + n + 1,
begin
rewrite [add.assoc, -add_zero n at {1}],
apply add_lt_add_left,
apply zero_lt_succ
end
end
-/
end nat
attribute [instance, priority nat.prio] nat.nat_has_divide nat.nat_has_mod nat.dvd.decidable_rel
|
6fe0c3eabc20fc24bbcf094943498d18ecc7b4b0 | 28be2ab6091504b6ba250b367205fb94d50ab284 | /src/game/world10/level6.lean | f36b40ccbf99f53240d90c7d05bbea1dd637dbbe | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | postmasters/natural_number_game | 87304ac22e5e1c5ac2382d6e523d6914dd67a92d | 38a7adcdfdb18c49c87b37831736c8f15300d821 | refs/heads/master | 1,649,856,819,031 | 1,586,444,676,000 | 1,586,444,676,000 | 255,006,061 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,586,664,599,000 | 1,586,664,598,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 846 | lean | import game.world10.level5 -- hide
namespace mynat -- hide
/-
# Inequality world.
## Level 6: `le_antisymm`
In Advanced Addition World you proved
`eq_zero_of_add_right_eq_self (a b : mynat) : a + b = a → b = 0`.
This might be useful in this level.
-/
/- Lemma
$\le$ is antisymmetric. In other words, if $a\le b$ and $b\le a$ then $a = b$.
-/
theorem le_antisymm (a b : mynat) (hab : a ≤ b) (hba : b ≤ a) : a = b :=
begin [nat_num_game]
cases hab with c hc,
cases hba with d hd,
rw hc at hd,
rw add_assoc at hd,
symmetry at hd,
have h := eq_zero_of_add_right_eq_self _ _ hd,
have h2 := add_right_eq_zero h,
rw h2 at hc,
rw hc,
exact add_zero a,
end
/-
Congratulations -- you just proved that the natural numbers are a partial order!
-/
instance : partial_order mynat := by structure_helper
end mynat -- hide
|
2c7e1f1925a058879d3787b0191b9be0d9678f7c | 5749d8999a76f3a8fddceca1f6941981e33aaa96 | /src/topology/metric_space/basic.lean | 02ed06bd2c0d469d8d914fcba805c0a6d05f16c4 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jdsalchow/mathlib | 13ab43ef0d0515a17e550b16d09bd14b76125276 | 497e692b946d93906900bb33a51fd243e7649406 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,819,143,348 | 1,580,072,892,000 | 1,580,072,892,000 | 154,287,128 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,540,281,610,000 | 1,540,281,609,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 68,117 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015, 2017 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Metric spaces.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Sébastien Gouëzel
Many definitions and theorems expected on metric spaces are already introduced on uniform spaces and
topological spaces. For example:
open and closed sets, compactness, completeness, continuity and uniform continuity
-/
import data.real.nnreal topology.metric_space.emetric_space topology.algebra.ordered
open lattice set filter classical topological_space
noncomputable theory
open_locale uniformity
open_locale topological_space
universes u v w
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
/-- Construct a uniform structure from a distance function and metric space axioms -/
def uniform_space_of_dist
(dist : α → α → ℝ)
(dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0)
(dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : uniform_space α :=
uniform_space.of_core {
uniformity := (⨅ ε>0, principal {p:α×α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε}),
refl := le_infi $ assume ε, le_infi $
by simp [set.subset_def, id_rel, dist_self, (>)] {contextual := tt},
comp := le_infi $ assume ε, le_infi $ assume h, lift'_le
(mem_infi_sets (ε / 2) $ mem_infi_sets (div_pos_of_pos_of_pos h two_pos) (subset.refl _)) $
have ∀ (a b c : α), dist a c < ε / 2 → dist c b < ε / 2 → dist a b < ε,
from assume a b c hac hcb,
calc dist a b ≤ dist a c + dist c b : dist_triangle _ _ _
... < ε / 2 + ε / 2 : add_lt_add hac hcb
... = ε : by rw [div_add_div_same, add_self_div_two],
by simpa [comp_rel],
symm := tendsto_infi.2 $ assume ε, tendsto_infi.2 $ assume h,
tendsto_infi' ε $ tendsto_infi' h $ tendsto_principal_principal.2 $ by simp [dist_comm] }
/-- The distance function (given an ambient metric space on `α`), which returns
a nonnegative real number `dist x y` given `x y : α`. -/
class has_dist (α : Type*) := (dist : α → α → ℝ)
export has_dist (dist)
section prio
set_option default_priority 100 -- see Note [default priority]
/-- Metric space
Each metric space induces a canonical `uniform_space` and hence a canonical `topological_space`.
This is enforced in the type class definition, by extending the `uniform_space` structure. When
instantiating a `metric_space` structure, the uniformity fields are not necessary, they will be
filled in by default. In the same way, each metric space induces an emetric space structure.
It is included in the structure, but filled in by default.
When one instantiates a metric space structure, for instance a product structure,
this makes it possible to use a uniform structure and an edistance that are exactly
the ones for the uniform spaces product and the emetric spaces products, thereby
ensuring that everything in defeq in diamonds.-/
class metric_space (α : Type u) extends has_dist α : Type u :=
(dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0)
(eq_of_dist_eq_zero : ∀ {x y : α}, dist x y = 0 → x = y)
(dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z)
(edist : α → α → ennreal := λx y, ennreal.of_real (dist x y))
(edist_dist : ∀ x y : α, edist x y = ennreal.of_real (dist x y) . control_laws_tac)
(to_uniform_space : uniform_space α := uniform_space_of_dist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle)
(uniformity_dist : 𝓤 α = ⨅ ε>0, principal {p:α×α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε} . control_laws_tac)
end prio
variables [metric_space α]
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance metric_space.to_uniform_space' : uniform_space α :=
metric_space.to_uniform_space α
@[priority 200] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance metric_space.to_has_edist : has_edist α := ⟨metric_space.edist⟩
@[simp] theorem dist_self (x : α) : dist x x = 0 := metric_space.dist_self x
theorem eq_of_dist_eq_zero {x y : α} : dist x y = 0 → x = y :=
metric_space.eq_of_dist_eq_zero
theorem dist_comm (x y : α) : dist x y = dist y x := metric_space.dist_comm x y
theorem edist_dist (x y : α) : edist x y = ennreal.of_real (dist x y) :=
metric_space.edist_dist _ x y
@[simp] theorem dist_eq_zero {x y : α} : dist x y = 0 ↔ x = y :=
iff.intro eq_of_dist_eq_zero (assume : x = y, this ▸ dist_self _)
@[simp] theorem zero_eq_dist {x y : α} : 0 = dist x y ↔ x = y :=
by rw [eq_comm, dist_eq_zero]
theorem dist_triangle (x y z : α) : dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z :=
metric_space.dist_triangle x y z
theorem dist_triangle_left (x y z : α) : dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y :=
by rw dist_comm z; apply dist_triangle
theorem dist_triangle_right (x y z : α) : dist x y ≤ dist x z + dist y z :=
by rw dist_comm y; apply dist_triangle
lemma dist_triangle4 (x y z w : α) :
dist x w ≤ dist x y + dist y z + dist z w :=
calc
dist x w ≤ dist x z + dist z w : dist_triangle x z w
... ≤ (dist x y + dist y z) + dist z w : add_le_add_right (metric_space.dist_triangle x y z) _
lemma dist_triangle4_left (x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : α) :
dist x₂ y₂ ≤ dist x₁ y₁ + (dist x₁ x₂ + dist y₁ y₂) :=
by rw [add_left_comm, dist_comm x₁, ← add_assoc]; apply dist_triangle4
lemma dist_triangle4_right (x₁ y₁ x₂ y₂ : α) :
dist x₁ y₁ ≤ dist x₁ x₂ + dist y₁ y₂ + dist x₂ y₂ :=
by rw [add_right_comm, dist_comm y₁]; apply dist_triangle4
/-- The triangle (polygon) inequality for sequences of points; `finset.Ico` version. -/
lemma dist_le_Ico_sum_dist (f : ℕ → α) {m n} (h : m ≤ n) :
dist (f m) (f n) ≤ (finset.Ico m n).sum (λ i, dist (f i) (f (i + 1))) :=
begin
revert n,
apply nat.le_induction,
{ simp only [finset.sum_empty, finset.Ico.self_eq_empty, dist_self] },
{ assume n hn hrec,
calc dist (f m) (f (n+1)) ≤ dist (f m) (f n) + dist _ _ : dist_triangle _ _ _
... ≤ (finset.Ico m n).sum _ + _ : add_le_add hrec (le_refl _)
... = (finset.Ico m (n+1)).sum _ :
by rw [finset.Ico.succ_top hn, finset.sum_insert, add_comm]; simp }
end
/-- The triangle (polygon) inequality for sequences of points; `finset.range` version. -/
lemma dist_le_range_sum_dist (f : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) :
dist (f 0) (f n) ≤ (finset.range n).sum (λ i, dist (f i) (f (i + 1))) :=
finset.Ico.zero_bot n ▸ dist_le_Ico_sum_dist f (nat.zero_le n)
/-- A version of `dist_le_Ico_sum_dist` with each intermediate distance replaced
with an upper estimate. -/
lemma dist_le_Ico_sum_of_dist_le {f : ℕ → α} {m n} (hmn : m ≤ n)
{d : ℕ → ℝ} (hd : ∀ {k}, m ≤ k → k < n → dist (f k) (f (k + 1)) ≤ d k) :
dist (f m) (f n) ≤ (finset.Ico m n).sum d :=
le_trans (dist_le_Ico_sum_dist f hmn) $
finset.sum_le_sum $ λ k hk, hd (finset.Ico.mem.1 hk).1 (finset.Ico.mem.1 hk).2
/-- A version of `dist_le_range_sum_dist` with each intermediate distance replaced
with an upper estimate. -/
lemma dist_le_range_sum_of_dist_le {f : ℕ → α} (n : ℕ)
{d : ℕ → ℝ} (hd : ∀ {k}, k < n → dist (f k) (f (k + 1)) ≤ d k) :
dist (f 0) (f n) ≤ (finset.range n).sum d :=
finset.Ico.zero_bot n ▸ dist_le_Ico_sum_of_dist_le (zero_le n) (λ _ _, hd)
theorem swap_dist : function.swap (@dist α _) = dist :=
by funext x y; exact dist_comm _ _
theorem abs_dist_sub_le (x y z : α) : abs (dist x z - dist y z) ≤ dist x y :=
abs_sub_le_iff.2
⟨sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (dist_triangle _ _ _),
sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (dist_triangle_left _ _ _)⟩
theorem dist_nonneg {x y : α} : 0 ≤ dist x y :=
have 2 * dist x y ≥ 0,
from calc 2 * dist x y = dist x y + dist y x : by rw [dist_comm x y, two_mul]
... ≥ 0 : by rw ← dist_self x; apply dist_triangle,
nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_left this two_pos
@[simp] theorem dist_le_zero {x y : α} : dist x y ≤ 0 ↔ x = y :=
by simpa [le_antisymm_iff, dist_nonneg] using @dist_eq_zero _ _ x y
@[simp] theorem dist_pos {x y : α} : 0 < dist x y ↔ x ≠ y :=
by simpa [-dist_le_zero] using not_congr (@dist_le_zero _ _ x y)
@[simp] theorem abs_dist {a b : α} : abs (dist a b) = dist a b :=
abs_of_nonneg dist_nonneg
theorem eq_of_forall_dist_le {x y : α} (h : ∀ε, ε > 0 → dist x y ≤ ε) : x = y :=
eq_of_dist_eq_zero (eq_of_le_of_forall_le_of_dense dist_nonneg h)
/-- Distance as a nonnegative real number. -/
def nndist (a b : α) : nnreal := ⟨dist a b, dist_nonneg⟩
/--Express `nndist` in terms of `edist`-/
lemma nndist_edist (x y : α) : nndist x y = (edist x y).to_nnreal :=
by simp [nndist, edist_dist, nnreal.of_real, max_eq_left dist_nonneg, ennreal.of_real]
/--Express `edist` in terms of `nndist`-/
lemma edist_nndist (x y : α) : edist x y = ↑(nndist x y) :=
by { rw [edist_dist, nndist, ennreal.of_real_eq_coe_nnreal] }
/--In a metric space, the extended distance is always finite-/
lemma edist_ne_top (x y : α) : edist x y ≠ ⊤ :=
by rw [edist_dist x y]; apply ennreal.coe_ne_top
/--`nndist x x` vanishes-/
@[simp] lemma nndist_self (a : α) : nndist a a = 0 := (nnreal.coe_eq_zero _).1 (dist_self a)
/--Express `dist` in terms of `nndist`-/
lemma dist_nndist (x y : α) : dist x y = ↑(nndist x y) := rfl
/--Express `nndist` in terms of `dist`-/
lemma nndist_dist (x y : α) : nndist x y = nnreal.of_real (dist x y) :=
by rw [dist_nndist, nnreal.of_real_coe]
/--Deduce the equality of points with the vanishing of the nonnegative distance-/
theorem eq_of_nndist_eq_zero {x y : α} : nndist x y = 0 → x = y :=
by simp only [nnreal.eq_iff.symm, (dist_nndist _ _).symm, imp_self, nnreal.coe_zero, dist_eq_zero]
theorem nndist_comm (x y : α) : nndist x y = nndist y x :=
by simpa [nnreal.eq_iff.symm] using dist_comm x y
/--Characterize the equality of points with the vanishing of the nonnegative distance-/
@[simp] theorem nndist_eq_zero {x y : α} : nndist x y = 0 ↔ x = y :=
by simp only [nnreal.eq_iff.symm, (dist_nndist _ _).symm, imp_self, nnreal.coe_zero, dist_eq_zero]
@[simp] theorem zero_eq_nndist {x y : α} : 0 = nndist x y ↔ x = y :=
by simp only [nnreal.eq_iff.symm, (dist_nndist _ _).symm, imp_self, nnreal.coe_zero, zero_eq_dist]
/--Triangle inequality for the nonnegative distance-/
theorem nndist_triangle (x y z : α) : nndist x z ≤ nndist x y + nndist y z :=
by simpa [nnreal.coe_le] using dist_triangle x y z
theorem nndist_triangle_left (x y z : α) : nndist x y ≤ nndist z x + nndist z y :=
by simpa [nnreal.coe_le] using dist_triangle_left x y z
theorem nndist_triangle_right (x y z : α) : nndist x y ≤ nndist x z + nndist y z :=
by simpa [nnreal.coe_le] using dist_triangle_right x y z
/--Express `dist` in terms of `edist`-/
lemma dist_edist (x y : α) : dist x y = (edist x y).to_real :=
by rw [edist_dist, ennreal.to_real_of_real (dist_nonneg)]
namespace metric
/- instantiate metric space as a topology -/
variables {x y z : α} {ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ} {s : set α}
/-- `ball x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x < ε` -/
def ball (x : α) (ε : ℝ) : set α := {y | dist y x < ε}
@[simp] theorem mem_ball : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ dist y x < ε := iff.rfl
theorem mem_ball' : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ dist x y < ε := by rw dist_comm; refl
/-- `closed_ball x ε` is the set of all points `y` with `dist y x ≤ ε` -/
def closed_ball (x : α) (ε : ℝ) := {y | dist y x ≤ ε}
@[simp] theorem mem_closed_ball : y ∈ closed_ball x ε ↔ dist y x ≤ ε := iff.rfl
theorem ball_subset_closed_ball : ball x ε ⊆ closed_ball x ε :=
assume y, by simp; intros h; apply le_of_lt h
theorem pos_of_mem_ball (hy : y ∈ ball x ε) : ε > 0 :=
lt_of_le_of_lt dist_nonneg hy
theorem mem_ball_self (h : ε > 0) : x ∈ ball x ε :=
show dist x x < ε, by rw dist_self; assumption
theorem mem_closed_ball_self (h : ε ≥ 0) : x ∈ closed_ball x ε :=
show dist x x ≤ ε, by rw dist_self; assumption
theorem mem_ball_comm : x ∈ ball y ε ↔ y ∈ ball x ε :=
by simp [dist_comm]
theorem ball_subset_ball (h : ε₁ ≤ ε₂) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball x ε₂ :=
λ y (yx : _ < ε₁), lt_of_lt_of_le yx h
theorem closed_ball_subset_closed_ball {α : Type u} [metric_space α] {ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ} {x : α} (h : ε₁ ≤ ε₂) :
closed_ball x ε₁ ⊆ closed_ball x ε₂ :=
λ y (yx : _ ≤ ε₁), le_trans yx h
theorem ball_disjoint (h : ε₁ + ε₂ ≤ dist x y) : ball x ε₁ ∩ ball y ε₂ = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 $ λ z ⟨h₁, h₂⟩,
not_lt_of_le (dist_triangle_left x y z)
(lt_of_lt_of_le (add_lt_add h₁ h₂) h)
theorem ball_disjoint_same (h : ε ≤ dist x y / 2) : ball x ε ∩ ball y ε = ∅ :=
ball_disjoint $ by rwa [← two_mul, ← le_div_iff' two_pos]
theorem ball_subset (h : dist x y ≤ ε₂ - ε₁) : ball x ε₁ ⊆ ball y ε₂ :=
λ z zx, by rw ← add_sub_cancel'_right ε₁ ε₂; exact
lt_of_le_of_lt (dist_triangle z x y) (add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le zx h)
theorem ball_half_subset (y) (h : y ∈ ball x (ε / 2)) : ball y (ε / 2) ⊆ ball x ε :=
ball_subset $ by rw sub_self_div_two; exact le_of_lt h
theorem exists_ball_subset_ball (h : y ∈ ball x ε) : ∃ ε' > 0, ball y ε' ⊆ ball x ε :=
⟨_, sub_pos.2 h, ball_subset $ by rw sub_sub_self⟩
theorem ball_eq_empty_iff_nonpos : ε ≤ 0 ↔ ball x ε = ∅ :=
(eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.trans
⟨λ h, le_of_not_gt $ λ ε0, h _ $ mem_ball_self ε0,
λ ε0 y h, not_lt_of_le ε0 $ pos_of_mem_ball h⟩).symm
theorem uniformity_dist : 𝓤 α = (⨅ ε>0, principal {p:α×α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε}) :=
metric_space.uniformity_dist _
theorem uniformity_dist' : 𝓤 α = (⨅ε:{ε:ℝ // ε>0}, principal {p:α×α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε.val}) :=
by simp [infi_subtype]; exact uniformity_dist
theorem mem_uniformity_dist {s : set (α×α)} :
s ∈ 𝓤 α ↔ (∃ε>0, ∀{a b:α}, dist a b < ε → (a, b) ∈ s) :=
begin
rw [uniformity_dist', mem_infi],
simp [subset_def],
exact assume ⟨r, hr⟩ ⟨p, hp⟩, ⟨⟨min r p, lt_min hr hp⟩, by simp [lt_min_iff, (≥)] {contextual := tt}⟩,
exact ⟨⟨1, zero_lt_one⟩⟩
end
theorem dist_mem_uniformity {ε:ℝ} (ε0 : 0 < ε) :
{p:α×α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε} ∈ 𝓤 α :=
mem_uniformity_dist.2 ⟨ε, ε0, λ a b, id⟩
theorem uniform_continuous_iff [metric_space β] {f : α → β} :
uniform_continuous f ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0,
∀{a b:α}, dist a b < δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε :=
uniform_continuous_def.trans
⟨λ H ε ε0, mem_uniformity_dist.1 $ H _ $ dist_mem_uniformity ε0,
λ H r ru,
let ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩ := mem_uniformity_dist.1 ru, ⟨δ, δ0, hδ⟩ := H _ ε0 in
mem_uniformity_dist.2 ⟨δ, δ0, λ a b h, hε (hδ h)⟩⟩
theorem uniform_embedding_iff [metric_space β] {f : α → β} :
uniform_embedding f ↔ function.injective f ∧ uniform_continuous f ∧
∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, dist (f a) (f b) < ε → dist a b < δ :=
uniform_embedding_def'.trans $ and_congr iff.rfl $ and_congr iff.rfl
⟨λ H δ δ0, let ⟨t, tu, ht⟩ := H _ (dist_mem_uniformity δ0),
⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩ := mem_uniformity_dist.1 tu in
⟨ε, ε0, λ a b h, ht _ _ (hε h)⟩,
λ H s su, let ⟨δ, δ0, hδ⟩ := mem_uniformity_dist.1 su, ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩ := H _ δ0 in
⟨_, dist_mem_uniformity ε0, λ a b h, hδ (hε h)⟩⟩
/-- A map between metric spaces is a uniform embedding if and only if the distance between `f x`
and `f y` is controlled in terms of the distance between `x` and `y` and conversely. -/
theorem uniform_embedding_iff' [metric_space β] {f : α → β} :
uniform_embedding f ↔
(∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, dist a b < δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε) ∧
(∀ δ > 0, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, dist (f a) (f b) < ε → dist a b < δ) :=
begin
split,
{ assume h,
exact ⟨uniform_continuous_iff.1 (uniform_embedding_iff.1 h).2.1,
(uniform_embedding_iff.1 h).2.2⟩ },
{ rintros ⟨h₁, h₂⟩,
refine uniform_embedding_iff.2 ⟨_, uniform_continuous_iff.2 h₁, h₂⟩,
assume x y hxy,
have : dist x y ≤ 0,
{ refine le_of_forall_lt' (λδ δpos, _),
rcases h₂ δ δpos with ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩,
have : dist (f x) (f y) < ε, by simpa [hxy],
exact hε this },
simpa using this }
end
theorem totally_bounded_iff {s : set α} :
totally_bounded s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃t : set α, finite t ∧ s ⊆ ⋃y∈t, ball y ε :=
⟨λ H ε ε0, H _ (dist_mem_uniformity ε0),
λ H r ru, let ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩ := mem_uniformity_dist.1 ru,
⟨t, ft, h⟩ := H ε ε0 in
⟨t, ft, subset.trans h $ Union_subset_Union $ λ y, Union_subset_Union $ λ yt z, hε⟩⟩
/-- A metric space space is totally bounded if one can reconstruct up to any ε>0 any element of the
space from finitely many data. -/
lemma totally_bounded_of_finite_discretization {α : Type u} [metric_space α] {s : set α}
(H : ∀ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃ (β : Type u) [fintype β] (F : s → β),
∀x y, F x = F y → dist (x:α) y < ε) :
totally_bounded s :=
begin
classical, by_cases hs : s = ∅,
{ rw hs, exact totally_bounded_empty },
rcases exists_mem_of_ne_empty hs with ⟨x0, hx0⟩,
haveI : inhabited s := ⟨⟨x0, hx0⟩⟩,
refine totally_bounded_iff.2 (λ ε ε0, _),
rcases H ε ε0 with ⟨β, fβ, F, hF⟩,
let Finv := function.inv_fun F,
refine ⟨range (subtype.val ∘ Finv), finite_range _, λ x xs, _⟩,
let x' := Finv (F ⟨x, xs⟩),
have : F x' = F ⟨x, xs⟩ := function.inv_fun_eq ⟨⟨x, xs⟩, rfl⟩,
simp only [set.mem_Union, set.mem_range],
exact ⟨_, ⟨F ⟨x, xs⟩, rfl⟩, hF _ _ this.symm⟩
end
protected lemma cauchy_iff {f : filter α} :
cauchy f ↔ f ≠ ⊥ ∧ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ x y ∈ t, dist x y < ε :=
cauchy_iff.trans $ and_congr iff.rfl
⟨λ H ε ε0, let ⟨t, tf, ts⟩ := H _ (dist_mem_uniformity ε0) in
⟨t, tf, λ x y xt yt, @ts (x, y) ⟨xt, yt⟩⟩,
λ H r ru, let ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩ := mem_uniformity_dist.1 ru,
⟨t, tf, h⟩ := H ε ε0 in
⟨t, tf, λ ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩, hε (h x y hx hy)⟩⟩
theorem nhds_eq : 𝓝 x = (⨅ε:{ε:ℝ // ε>0}, principal (ball x ε.val)) :=
begin
rw [nhds_eq_uniformity, uniformity_dist', lift'_infi],
{ apply congr_arg, funext ε,
rw [lift'_principal],
{ simp [ball, dist_comm] },
{ exact monotone_preimage } },
{ exact ⟨⟨1, zero_lt_one⟩⟩ },
{ intros, refl }
end
theorem mem_nhds_iff : s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ε>0, ball x ε ⊆ s :=
begin
rw [nhds_eq, mem_infi],
{ simp },
{ intros y z, cases y with y hy, cases z with z hz,
refine ⟨⟨min y z, lt_min hy hz⟩, _⟩,
simp [ball_subset_ball, min_le_left, min_le_right, (≥)] },
{ exact ⟨⟨1, zero_lt_one⟩⟩ }
end
theorem is_open_iff : is_open s ↔ ∀x∈s, ∃ε>0, ball x ε ⊆ s :=
by simp [is_open_iff_nhds, mem_nhds_iff]
theorem is_open_ball : is_open (ball x ε) :=
is_open_iff.2 $ λ y, exists_ball_subset_ball
theorem ball_mem_nhds (x : α) {ε : ℝ} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : ball x ε ∈ 𝓝 x :=
mem_nhds_sets is_open_ball (mem_ball_self ε0)
@[nolint]
theorem mem_nhds_within_iff {t : set α} : s ∈ nhds_within x t ↔ ∃ε>0, ball x ε ∩ t ⊆ s :=
begin
rw [mem_nhds_within_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter],
split,
{ rintros ⟨u, hu, H⟩,
rcases mem_nhds_iff.1 hu with ⟨ε, ε_pos, hε⟩,
exact ⟨ε, ε_pos, subset.trans (inter_subset_inter_left _ hε) H⟩ },
{ rintros ⟨ε, ε_pos, H⟩,
exact ⟨ball x ε, ball_mem_nhds x ε_pos, H⟩ }
end
@[nolint]
theorem tendsto_nhds_within_nhds_within [metric_space β] {t : set β} {f : α → β} {a b} :
tendsto f (nhds_within a s) (nhds_within b t) ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀{x:α}, x ∈ s → dist x a < δ → f x ∈ t ∧ dist (f x) b < ε :=
begin
split,
{ assume H ε ε_pos,
have : ball b ε ∩ t ∈ nhds_within b t,
by { rw mem_nhds_within_iff, exact ⟨ε, ε_pos, subset.refl _⟩ },
rcases mem_nhds_within_iff.1 (H this) with ⟨δ, δ_pos, hδ⟩,
exact ⟨δ, δ_pos, λx xs dx, ⟨(hδ ⟨dx, xs⟩).2, (hδ ⟨dx, xs⟩).1⟩⟩ },
{ assume H u hu,
rcases mem_nhds_within_iff.1 hu with ⟨ε, ε_pos, hε⟩,
rcases H ε ε_pos with ⟨δ, δ_pos, hδ⟩,
rw [mem_map, mem_nhds_within_iff],
exact ⟨δ, δ_pos, λx hx, hε ⟨(hδ hx.2 hx.1).2, (hδ hx.2 hx.1).1⟩⟩ }
end
@[nolint]
theorem tendsto_nhds_within_nhds [metric_space β] {f : α → β} {a b} :
tendsto f (nhds_within a s) (𝓝 b) ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀{x:α}, x ∈ s → dist x a < δ → dist (f x) b < ε :=
by { rw [← nhds_within_univ, tendsto_nhds_within_nhds_within], simp }
@[nolint]
theorem tendsto_nhds_nhds [metric_space β] {f : α → β} {a b} :
tendsto f (𝓝 a) (𝓝 b) ↔
∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀{x:α}, dist x a < δ → dist (f x) b < ε :=
by { rw [← nhds_within_univ, ← nhds_within_univ, tendsto_nhds_within_nhds_within], simp }
theorem continuous_iff [metric_space β] {f : α → β} :
continuous f ↔
∀b (ε > 0), ∃ δ > 0, ∀a, dist a b < δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.trans $ forall_congr $ λ b, tendsto_nhds_nhds
theorem exists_delta_of_continuous [metric_space β] {f : α → β} {ε : ℝ}
(hf : continuous f) (hε : ε > 0) (b : α) :
∃ δ > 0, ∀a, dist a b ≤ δ → dist (f a) (f b) < ε :=
let ⟨δ, δ_pos, hδ⟩ := continuous_iff.1 hf b ε hε in
⟨δ / 2, half_pos δ_pos, assume a ha, hδ a $ lt_of_le_of_lt ha $ div_two_lt_of_pos δ_pos⟩
theorem tendsto_nhds {f : filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α} :
tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ n ∈ f, ∀x ∈ n, dist (u x) a < ε :=
by simp only [metric.nhds_eq, tendsto_infi, subtype.forall, tendsto_principal, mem_ball];
exact forall_congr (assume ε, forall_congr (assume hε, exists_sets_subset_iff.symm))
theorem continuous_iff' [topological_space β] {f : β → α} :
continuous f ↔ ∀a (ε > 0), ∃ n ∈ 𝓝 a, ∀b ∈ n, dist (f b) (f a) < ε :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.trans $ forall_congr $ λ b, tendsto_nhds
theorem tendsto_at_top [nonempty β] [semilattice_sup β] {u : β → α} {a : α} :
tendsto u at_top (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ε>0, ∃N, ∀n≥N, dist (u n) a < ε :=
by simp only [metric.nhds_eq, tendsto_infi, subtype.forall, tendsto_at_top_principal]; refl
end metric
open metric
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance metric_space.to_separated : separated α :=
separated_def.2 $ λ x y h, eq_of_forall_dist_le $
λ ε ε0, le_of_lt (h _ (dist_mem_uniformity ε0))
/-Instantiate a metric space as an emetric space. Before we can state the instance,
we need to show that the uniform structure coming from the edistance and the
distance coincide. -/
/-- Expressing the uniformity in terms of `edist` -/
protected lemma metric.mem_uniformity_edist {s : set (α×α)} :
s ∈ 𝓤 α ↔ (∃ε>0, ∀{a b:α}, edist a b < ε → (a, b) ∈ s) :=
begin
refine mem_uniformity_dist.trans ⟨_, _⟩; rintro ⟨ε, ε0, Hε⟩,
{ refine ⟨ennreal.of_real ε, _, λ a b, _⟩,
{ rwa [gt, ennreal.of_real_pos] },
{ rw [edist_dist, ennreal.of_real_lt_of_real_iff ε0],
exact Hε } },
{ rcases ennreal.lt_iff_exists_real_btwn.1 ε0 with ⟨ε', _, ε0', hε⟩,
rw [ennreal.of_real_pos] at ε0',
refine ⟨ε', ε0', λ a b h, Hε (lt_trans _ hε)⟩,
rwa [edist_dist, ennreal.of_real_lt_of_real_iff ε0'] }
end
protected theorem metric.uniformity_edist' : 𝓤 α = (⨅ε:{ε:ennreal // ε>0}, principal {p:α×α | edist p.1 p.2 < ε.val}) :=
begin
ext s, rw mem_infi,
{ simp [metric.mem_uniformity_edist, subset_def] },
{ rintro ⟨r, hr⟩ ⟨p, hp⟩, use ⟨min r p, lt_min hr hp⟩,
simp [lt_min_iff, (≥)] {contextual := tt} },
{ exact ⟨⟨1, ennreal.zero_lt_one⟩⟩ }
end
theorem uniformity_edist : 𝓤 α = (⨅ ε>0, principal {p:α×α | edist p.1 p.2 < ε}) :=
by simpa [infi_subtype] using @metric.uniformity_edist' α _
/-- A metric space induces an emetric space -/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance metric_space.to_emetric_space : emetric_space α :=
{ edist := edist,
edist_self := by simp [edist_dist],
eq_of_edist_eq_zero := assume x y h, by simpa [edist_dist] using h,
edist_comm := by simp only [edist_dist, dist_comm]; simp,
edist_triangle := assume x y z, begin
simp only [edist_dist, (ennreal.of_real_add _ _).symm, dist_nonneg],
rw ennreal.of_real_le_of_real_iff _,
{ exact dist_triangle _ _ _ },
{ simpa using add_le_add (dist_nonneg : 0 ≤ dist x y) dist_nonneg }
end,
uniformity_edist := uniformity_edist,
..‹metric_space α› }
/-- Balls defined using the distance or the edistance coincide -/
lemma metric.emetric_ball {x : α} {ε : ℝ} : emetric.ball x (ennreal.of_real ε) = ball x ε :=
begin
classical, by_cases h : 0 < ε,
{ ext y, by simp [edist_dist, ennreal.of_real_lt_of_real_iff h] },
{ have h' : ε ≤ 0, by simpa using h,
have A : ball x ε = ∅, by simpa [ball_eq_empty_iff_nonpos.symm],
have B : emetric.ball x (ennreal.of_real ε) = ∅,
by simp [ennreal.of_real_eq_zero.2 h', emetric.ball_eq_empty_iff],
rwa [A, B] }
end
/-- Closed balls defined using the distance or the edistance coincide -/
lemma metric.emetric_closed_ball {x : α} {ε : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ ε) :
emetric.closed_ball x (ennreal.of_real ε) = closed_ball x ε :=
by ext y; simp [edist_dist]; rw ennreal.of_real_le_of_real_iff h
def metric_space.replace_uniformity {α} [U : uniform_space α] (m : metric_space α)
(H : @uniformity _ U = @uniformity _ (metric_space.to_uniform_space α)) :
metric_space α :=
{ dist := @dist _ m.to_has_dist,
dist_self := dist_self,
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := @eq_of_dist_eq_zero _ _,
dist_comm := dist_comm,
dist_triangle := dist_triangle,
edist := edist,
edist_dist := edist_dist,
to_uniform_space := U,
uniformity_dist := H.trans (metric_space.uniformity_dist α) }
/-- One gets a metric space from an emetric space if the edistance
is everywhere finite, by pushing the edistance to reals. We set it up so that the edist and the
uniformity are defeq in the metric space and the emetric space. In this definition, the distance
is given separately, to be able to prescribe some expression which is not defeq to the push-forward
of the edistance to reals. -/
def emetric_space.to_metric_space_of_dist {α : Type u} [e : emetric_space α]
(dist : α → α → ℝ)
(edist_ne_top : ∀x y: α, edist x y ≠ ⊤)
(h : ∀x y, dist x y = ennreal.to_real (edist x y)) :
metric_space α :=
let m : metric_space α :=
{ dist := dist,
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := λx y hxy, by simpa [h, ennreal.to_real_eq_zero_iff, edist_ne_top x y] using hxy,
dist_self := λx, by simp [h],
dist_comm := λx y, by simp [h, emetric_space.edist_comm],
dist_triangle := λx y z, begin
simp only [h],
rw [← ennreal.to_real_add (edist_ne_top _ _) (edist_ne_top _ _),
ennreal.to_real_le_to_real (edist_ne_top _ _)],
{ exact edist_triangle _ _ _ },
{ simp [ennreal.add_eq_top, edist_ne_top] }
end,
edist := λx y, edist x y,
edist_dist := λx y, by simp [h, ennreal.of_real_to_real, edist_ne_top] } in
metric_space.replace_uniformity m (by rw [uniformity_edist, uniformity_edist']; refl)
/-- One gets a metric space from an emetric space if the edistance
is everywhere finite, by pushing the edistance to reals. We set it up so that the edist and the
uniformity are defeq in the metric space and the emetric space. -/
def emetric_space.to_metric_space {α : Type u} [e : emetric_space α] (h : ∀x y: α, edist x y ≠ ⊤) :
metric_space α :=
emetric_space.to_metric_space_of_dist (λx y, ennreal.to_real (edist x y)) h (λx y, rfl)
/-- A very useful criterion to show that a space is complete is to show that all sequences
which satisfy a bound of the form `dist (u n) (u m) < B N` for all `n m ≥ N` are
converging. This is often applied for `B N = 2^{-N}`, i.e., with a very fast convergence to
`0`, which makes it possible to use arguments of converging series, while this is impossible
to do in general for arbitrary Cauchy sequences. -/
theorem metric.complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences (B : ℕ → real) (hB : ∀n, 0 < B n)
(H : ∀u : ℕ → α, (∀N n m : ℕ, N ≤ n → N ≤ m → dist (u n) (u m) < B N) → ∃x, tendsto u at_top (𝓝 x)) :
complete_space α :=
begin
-- this follows from the same criterion in emetric spaces. We just need to translate
-- the convergence assumption from `dist` to `edist`
apply emetric.complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences (λn, ennreal.of_real (B n)),
{ simp [hB] },
{ assume u Hu,
apply H,
assume N n m hn hm,
rw [← ennreal.of_real_lt_of_real_iff (hB N), ← edist_dist],
exact Hu N n m hn hm }
end
theorem metric.complete_of_cauchy_seq_tendsto :
(∀ u : ℕ → α, cauchy_seq u → ∃a, tendsto u at_top (𝓝 a)) → complete_space α :=
emetric.complete_of_cauchy_seq_tendsto
section real
/-- Instantiate the reals as a metric space. -/
instance real.metric_space : metric_space ℝ :=
{ dist := λx y, abs (x - y),
dist_self := by simp [abs_zero],
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := by simp [add_neg_eq_zero],
dist_comm := assume x y, abs_sub _ _,
dist_triangle := assume x y z, abs_sub_le _ _ _ }
theorem real.dist_eq (x y : ℝ) : dist x y = abs (x - y) := rfl
theorem real.dist_0_eq_abs (x : ℝ) : dist x 0 = abs x :=
by simp [real.dist_eq]
instance : order_topology ℝ :=
order_topology_of_nhds_abs $ λ x, begin
simp only [show ∀ r, {b : ℝ | abs (x - b) < r} = ball x r,
by simp [-sub_eq_add_neg, abs_sub, ball, real.dist_eq]],
apply le_antisymm,
{ simp [le_infi_iff],
exact λ ε ε0, mem_nhds_sets (is_open_ball) (mem_ball_self ε0) },
{ intros s h,
rcases mem_nhds_iff.1 h with ⟨ε, ε0, ss⟩,
exact mem_infi_sets _ (mem_infi_sets ε0 (mem_principal_sets.2 ss)) },
end
lemma closed_ball_Icc {x r : ℝ} : closed_ball x r = Icc (x-r) (x+r) :=
by ext y; rw [mem_closed_ball, dist_comm, real.dist_eq,
abs_sub_le_iff, mem_Icc, ← sub_le_iff_le_add', sub_le]
lemma squeeze_zero {α} {f g : α → ℝ} {t₀ : filter α} (hf : ∀t, 0 ≤ f t) (hft : ∀t, f t ≤ g t)
(g0 : tendsto g t₀ (𝓝 0)) : tendsto f t₀ (𝓝 0) :=
begin
apply tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le (tendsto_const_nhds) g0;
simp [*]; exact filter.univ_mem_sets
end
theorem metric.uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero :
𝓤 α = comap (λp:α×α, dist p.1 p.2) (𝓝 (0 : ℝ)) :=
begin
simp only [uniformity_dist', nhds_eq, comap_infi, comap_principal],
congr, funext ε,
rw [principal_eq_iff_eq],
ext ⟨a, b⟩,
simp [real.dist_0_eq_abs]
end
lemma cauchy_seq_iff_tendsto_dist_at_top_0 [inhabited β] [semilattice_sup β] {u : β → α} :
cauchy_seq u ↔ tendsto (λ (n : β × β), dist (u n.1) (u n.2)) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
by rw [cauchy_seq_iff_prod_map, metric.uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero, ← map_le_iff_le_comap,
filter.map_map, tendsto, prod.map_def]
end real
section cauchy_seq
variables [inhabited β] [semilattice_sup β]
/-- In a metric space, Cauchy sequences are characterized by the fact that, eventually,
the distance between its elements is arbitrarily small -/
theorem metric.cauchy_seq_iff {u : β → α} :
cauchy_seq u ↔ ∀ε>0, ∃N, ∀m n≥N, dist (u m) (u n) < ε :=
begin
unfold cauchy_seq,
rw metric.cauchy_iff,
simp only [true_and, exists_prop, filter.mem_at_top_sets, filter.at_top_ne_bot,
filter.mem_map, ne.def, filter.map_eq_bot_iff, not_false_iff, set.mem_set_of_eq],
split,
{ intros H ε εpos,
rcases H ε εpos with ⟨t, ⟨N, hN⟩, ht⟩,
exact ⟨N, λm n hm hn, ht _ _ (hN _ hm) (hN _ hn)⟩ },
{ intros H ε εpos,
rcases H (ε/2) (half_pos εpos) with ⟨N, hN⟩,
existsi ball (u N) (ε/2),
split,
{ exact ⟨N, λx hx, hN _ _ hx (le_refl N)⟩ },
{ exact λx y hx hy, calc
dist x y ≤ dist x (u N) + dist y (u N) : dist_triangle_right _ _ _
... < ε/2 + ε/2 : add_lt_add hx hy
... = ε : add_halves _ } }
end
/-- A variation around the metric characterization of Cauchy sequences -/
theorem metric.cauchy_seq_iff' {u : β → α} :
cauchy_seq u ↔ ∀ε>0, ∃N, ∀n≥N, dist (u n) (u N) < ε :=
begin
rw metric.cauchy_seq_iff,
split,
{ intros H ε εpos,
rcases H ε εpos with ⟨N, hN⟩,
exact ⟨N, λn hn, hN _ _ hn (le_refl N)⟩ },
{ intros H ε εpos,
rcases H (ε/2) (half_pos εpos) with ⟨N, hN⟩,
exact ⟨N, λ m n hm hn, calc
dist (u m) (u n) ≤ dist (u m) (u N) + dist (u n) (u N) : dist_triangle_right _ _ _
... < ε/2 + ε/2 : add_lt_add (hN _ hm) (hN _ hn)
... = ε : add_halves _⟩ }
end
/-- If the distance between `s n` and `s m`, `n, m ≥ N` is bounded above by `b N`
and `b` converges to zero, then `s` is a Cauchy sequence. -/
lemma cauchy_seq_of_le_tendsto_0 {s : β → α} (b : β → ℝ)
(h : ∀ n m N : β, N ≤ n → N ≤ m → dist (s n) (s m) ≤ b N) (h₀ : tendsto b at_top (nhds 0)) :
cauchy_seq s :=
metric.cauchy_seq_iff.2 $ λ ε ε0,
(metric.tendsto_at_top.1 h₀ ε ε0).imp $ λ N hN m n hm hn,
calc dist (s m) (s n) ≤ b N : h m n N hm hn
... ≤ abs (b N) : le_abs_self _
... = dist (b N) 0 : by rw real.dist_0_eq_abs; refl
... < ε : (hN _ (le_refl N))
/-- A Cauchy sequence on the natural numbers is bounded. -/
theorem cauchy_seq_bdd {u : ℕ → α} (hu : cauchy_seq u) :
∃ R > 0, ∀ m n, dist (u m) (u n) < R :=
begin
rcases metric.cauchy_seq_iff'.1 hu 1 zero_lt_one with ⟨N, hN⟩,
suffices : ∃ R > 0, ∀ n, dist (u n) (u N) < R,
{ rcases this with ⟨R, R0, H⟩,
exact ⟨_, add_pos R0 R0, λ m n,
lt_of_le_of_lt (dist_triangle_right _ _ _) (add_lt_add (H m) (H n))⟩ },
let R := finset.sup (finset.range N) (λ n, nndist (u n) (u N)),
refine ⟨↑R + 1, add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos R.2 zero_lt_one, λ n, _⟩,
cases le_or_lt N n,
{ exact lt_of_lt_of_le (hN _ h) (le_add_of_nonneg_left R.2) },
{ have : _ ≤ R := finset.le_sup (finset.mem_range.2 h),
exact lt_of_le_of_lt this (lt_add_of_pos_right _ zero_lt_one) }
end
/-- Yet another metric characterization of Cauchy sequences on integers. This one is often the
most efficient. -/
lemma cauchy_seq_iff_le_tendsto_0 {s : ℕ → α} : cauchy_seq s ↔ ∃ b : ℕ → ℝ,
(∀ n, 0 ≤ b n) ∧
(∀ n m N : ℕ, N ≤ n → N ≤ m → dist (s n) (s m) ≤ b N) ∧
tendsto b at_top (𝓝 0) :=
⟨λ hs, begin
/- `s` is a Cauchy sequence. The sequence `b` will be constructed by taking
the supremum of the distances between `s n` and `s m` for `n m ≥ N`.
First, we prove that all these distances are bounded, as otherwise the Sup
would not make sense. -/
let S := λ N, (λ(p : ℕ × ℕ), dist (s p.1) (s p.2)) '' {p | p.1 ≥ N ∧ p.2 ≥ N},
have hS : ∀ N, ∃ x, ∀ y ∈ S N, y ≤ x,
{ rcases cauchy_seq_bdd hs with ⟨R, R0, hR⟩,
refine λ N, ⟨R, _⟩, rintro _ ⟨⟨m, n⟩, _, rfl⟩,
exact le_of_lt (hR m n) },
have bdd : bdd_above (range (λ(p : ℕ × ℕ), dist (s p.1) (s p.2))),
{ rcases cauchy_seq_bdd hs with ⟨R, R0, hR⟩,
use R, rintro _ ⟨⟨m, n⟩, rfl⟩, exact le_of_lt (hR m n) },
-- Prove that it bounds the distances of points in the Cauchy sequence
have ub : ∀ m n N, N ≤ m → N ≤ n → dist (s m) (s n) ≤ real.Sup (S N) :=
λ m n N hm hn, real.le_Sup _ (hS N) ⟨⟨_, _⟩, ⟨hm, hn⟩, rfl⟩,
have S0m : ∀ n, (0:ℝ) ∈ S n := λ n, ⟨⟨n, n⟩, ⟨le_refl _, le_refl _⟩, dist_self _⟩,
have S0 := λ n, real.le_Sup _ (hS n) (S0m n),
-- Prove that it tends to `0`, by using the Cauchy property of `s`
refine ⟨λ N, real.Sup (S N), S0, ub, metric.tendsto_at_top.2 (λ ε ε0, _)⟩,
refine (metric.cauchy_seq_iff.1 hs (ε/2) (half_pos ε0)).imp (λ N hN n hn, _),
rw [real.dist_0_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg (S0 n)],
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (real.Sup_le_ub _ ⟨_, S0m _⟩ _) (half_lt_self ε0),
rintro _ ⟨⟨m', n'⟩, ⟨hm', hn'⟩, rfl⟩,
exact le_of_lt (hN _ _ (le_trans hn hm') (le_trans hn hn'))
end,
λ ⟨b, _, b_bound, b_lim⟩, cauchy_seq_of_le_tendsto_0 b b_bound b_lim⟩
end cauchy_seq
def metric_space.induced {α β} (f : α → β) (hf : function.injective f)
(m : metric_space β) : metric_space α :=
{ dist := λ x y, dist (f x) (f y),
dist_self := λ x, dist_self _,
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := λ x y h, hf (dist_eq_zero.1 h),
dist_comm := λ x y, dist_comm _ _,
dist_triangle := λ x y z, dist_triangle _ _ _,
edist := λ x y, edist (f x) (f y),
edist_dist := λ x y, edist_dist _ _,
to_uniform_space := uniform_space.comap f m.to_uniform_space,
uniformity_dist := begin
apply @uniformity_dist_of_mem_uniformity _ _ _ _ _ (λ x y, dist (f x) (f y)),
refine λ s, mem_comap_sets.trans _,
split; intro H,
{ rcases H with ⟨r, ru, rs⟩,
rcases mem_uniformity_dist.1 ru with ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩,
refine ⟨ε, ε0, λ a b h, rs (hε _)⟩, exact h },
{ rcases H with ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩,
exact ⟨_, dist_mem_uniformity ε0, λ ⟨a, b⟩, hε⟩ }
end }
instance subtype.metric_space {α : Type*} {p : α → Prop} [t : metric_space α] :
metric_space (subtype p) :=
metric_space.induced subtype.val (λ x y, subtype.eq) t
theorem subtype.dist_eq {p : α → Prop} (x y : subtype p) : dist x y = dist x.1 y.1 := rfl
section nnreal
instance : metric_space nnreal := by unfold nnreal; apply_instance
lemma nnreal.dist_eq (a b : nnreal) : dist a b = abs ((a:ℝ) - b) := rfl
lemma nnreal.nndist_eq (a b : nnreal) :
nndist a b = max (a - b) (b - a) :=
begin
wlog h : a ≤ b,
{ apply nnreal.coe_eq.1,
rw [nnreal.sub_eq_zero h, max_eq_right (zero_le $ b - a), ← dist_nndist, nnreal.dist_eq,
nnreal.coe_sub h, abs, neg_sub],
apply max_eq_right,
linarith [nnreal.coe_le.2 h] },
rwa [nndist_comm, max_comm]
end
end nnreal
section prod
instance prod.metric_space_max [metric_space β] : metric_space (α × β) :=
{ dist := λ x y, max (dist x.1 y.1) (dist x.2 y.2),
dist_self := λ x, by simp,
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := λ x y h, begin
cases max_le_iff.1 (le_of_eq h) with h₁ h₂,
exact prod.ext_iff.2 ⟨dist_le_zero.1 h₁, dist_le_zero.1 h₂⟩
end,
dist_comm := λ x y, by simp [dist_comm],
dist_triangle := λ x y z, max_le
(le_trans (dist_triangle _ _ _) (add_le_add (le_max_left _ _) (le_max_left _ _)))
(le_trans (dist_triangle _ _ _) (add_le_add (le_max_right _ _) (le_max_right _ _))),
edist := λ x y, max (edist x.1 y.1) (edist x.2 y.2),
edist_dist := assume x y, begin
have : monotone ennreal.of_real := assume x y h, ennreal.of_real_le_of_real h,
rw [edist_dist, edist_dist, this.map_max.symm]
end,
uniformity_dist := begin
refine uniformity_prod.trans _,
simp [uniformity_dist, comap_infi],
rw ← infi_inf_eq, congr, funext,
rw ← infi_inf_eq, congr, funext,
simp [inf_principal, ext_iff, max_lt_iff]
end,
to_uniform_space := prod.uniform_space }
lemma prod.dist_eq [metric_space β] {x y : α × β} :
dist x y = max (dist x.1 y.1) (dist x.2 y.2) := rfl
end prod
theorem uniform_continuous_dist' : uniform_continuous (λp:α×α, dist p.1 p.2) :=
metric.uniform_continuous_iff.2 (λ ε ε0, ⟨ε/2, half_pos ε0,
begin
suffices,
{ intros p q h, cases p with p₁ p₂, cases q with q₁ q₂,
cases max_lt_iff.1 h with h₁ h₂, clear h,
dsimp at h₁ h₂ ⊢,
rw real.dist_eq,
refine abs_sub_lt_iff.2 ⟨_, _⟩,
{ revert p₁ p₂ q₁ q₂ h₁ h₂, exact this },
{ apply this; rwa dist_comm } },
intros p₁ p₂ q₁ q₂ h₁ h₂,
have := add_lt_add
(abs_sub_lt_iff.1 (lt_of_le_of_lt (abs_dist_sub_le p₁ q₁ p₂) h₁)).1
(abs_sub_lt_iff.1 (lt_of_le_of_lt (abs_dist_sub_le p₂ q₂ q₁) h₂)).1,
rwa [add_halves, dist_comm p₂, sub_add_sub_cancel, dist_comm q₂] at this
end⟩)
theorem uniform_continuous_dist [uniform_space β] {f g : β → α}
(hf : uniform_continuous f) (hg : uniform_continuous g) :
uniform_continuous (λb, dist (f b) (g b)) :=
uniform_continuous_dist'.comp (hf.prod_mk hg)
theorem continuous_dist' : continuous (λp:α×α, dist p.1 p.2) :=
uniform_continuous_dist'.continuous
theorem continuous_dist [topological_space β] {f g : β → α}
(hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g) : continuous (λb, dist (f b) (g b)) :=
continuous_dist'.comp (hf.prod_mk hg)
theorem tendsto_dist {f g : β → α} {x : filter β} {a b : α}
(hf : tendsto f x (𝓝 a)) (hg : tendsto g x (𝓝 b)) :
tendsto (λx, dist (f x) (g x)) x (𝓝 (dist a b)) :=
have tendsto (λp:α×α, dist p.1 p.2) (𝓝 (a, b)) (𝓝 (dist a b)),
from continuous_iff_continuous_at.mp continuous_dist' (a, b),
tendsto.comp (by rw [nhds_prod_eq] at this; exact this) (hf.prod_mk hg)
lemma nhds_comap_dist (a : α) : (𝓝 (0 : ℝ)).comap (λa', dist a' a) = 𝓝 a :=
have h₁ : ∀ε, (λa', dist a' a) ⁻¹' ball 0 ε ⊆ ball a ε,
by simp [subset_def, real.dist_0_eq_abs],
have h₂ : tendsto (λa', dist a' a) (𝓝 a) (𝓝 (dist a a)),
from tendsto_dist tendsto_id tendsto_const_nhds,
le_antisymm
(by simp [h₁, nhds_eq, infi_le_infi, principal_mono,
-le_principal_iff, -le_infi_iff])
(by simpa [map_le_iff_le_comap.symm, tendsto] using h₂)
lemma tendsto_iff_dist_tendsto_zero {f : β → α} {x : filter β} {a : α} :
(tendsto f x (𝓝 a)) ↔ (tendsto (λb, dist (f b) a) x (𝓝 0)) :=
by rw [← nhds_comap_dist a, tendsto_comap_iff]
lemma uniform_continuous_nndist' : uniform_continuous (λp:α×α, nndist p.1 p.2) :=
uniform_continuous_subtype_mk uniform_continuous_dist' _
lemma continuous_nndist' : continuous (λp:α×α, nndist p.1 p.2) :=
uniform_continuous_nndist'.continuous
lemma continuous_nndist [topological_space β] {f g : β → α}
(hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g) : continuous (λb, nndist (f b) (g b)) :=
continuous_nndist'.comp (hf.prod_mk hg)
lemma tendsto_nndist' (a b :α) :
tendsto (λp:α×α, nndist p.1 p.2) (filter.prod (𝓝 a) (𝓝 b)) (𝓝 (nndist a b)) :=
by rw [← nhds_prod_eq]; exact continuous_iff_continuous_at.1 continuous_nndist' _
namespace metric
variables {x y z : α} {ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ} {s : set α}
theorem is_closed_ball : is_closed (closed_ball x ε) :=
is_closed_le (continuous_dist continuous_id continuous_const) continuous_const
/-- ε-characterization of the closure in metric spaces-/
theorem mem_closure_iff' {α : Type u} [metric_space α] {s : set α} {a : α} :
a ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ε>0, ∃b ∈ s, dist a b < ε :=
⟨begin
intros ha ε hε,
have A : ball a ε ∩ s ≠ ∅ := mem_closure_iff.1 ha _ is_open_ball (mem_ball_self hε),
cases ne_empty_iff_exists_mem.1 A with b hb,
simp,
exact ⟨b, ⟨hb.2, by have B := hb.1; simpa [mem_ball'] using B⟩⟩
end,
begin
intros H,
apply mem_closure_iff.2,
intros o ho ao,
rcases is_open_iff.1 ho a ao with ⟨ε, ⟨εpos, hε⟩⟩,
rcases H ε εpos with ⟨b, ⟨bs, bdist⟩⟩,
have B : b ∈ o ∩ s := ⟨hε (by simpa [dist_comm]), bs⟩,
apply ne_empty_of_mem B
end⟩
lemma mem_closure_range_iff {α : Type u} [metric_space α] {e : β → α} {a : α} :
a ∈ closure (range e) ↔ ∀ε>0, ∃ k : β, dist a (e k) < ε :=
iff.intro
( assume ha ε hε,
let ⟨b, ⟨hb, hab⟩⟩ := metric.mem_closure_iff'.1 ha ε hε in
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := mem_range.1 hb in
⟨k, by { rw hk, exact hab }⟩ )
( assume h, metric.mem_closure_iff'.2 (assume ε hε,
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := h ε hε in
⟨e k, ⟨mem_range.2 ⟨k, rfl⟩, hk⟩⟩) )
lemma mem_closure_range_iff_nat {α : Type u} [metric_space α] {e : β → α} {a : α} :
a ∈ closure (range e) ↔ ∀n : ℕ, ∃ k : β, dist a (e k) < 1 / ((n : ℝ) + 1) :=
⟨assume ha n, mem_closure_range_iff.1 ha (1 / ((n : ℝ) + 1)) nat.one_div_pos_of_nat,
assume h, mem_closure_range_iff.2 $ assume ε hε,
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_nat_one_div_lt hε in
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := h n in
⟨k, calc dist a (e k) < 1 / ((n : ℝ) + 1) : hk ... < ε : hn⟩⟩
theorem mem_of_closed' {α : Type u} [metric_space α] {s : set α} (hs : is_closed s)
{a : α} : a ∈ s ↔ ∀ε>0, ∃b ∈ s, dist a b < ε :=
by simpa only [closure_eq_of_is_closed hs] using @mem_closure_iff' _ _ s a
end metric
section pi
open finset lattice
variables {π : β → Type*} [fintype β] [∀b, metric_space (π b)]
/-- A finite product of metric spaces is a metric space, with the sup distance. -/
instance metric_space_pi : metric_space (Πb, π b) :=
begin
/- we construct the instance from the emetric space instance to avoid checking again that the
uniformity is the same as the product uniformity, but we register nevertheless a nice formula
for the distance -/
refine emetric_space.to_metric_space_of_dist
(λf g, ((sup univ (λb, nndist (f b) (g b)) : nnreal) : ℝ)) _ _,
show ∀ (x y : Π (b : β), π b), edist x y ≠ ⊤,
{ assume x y,
rw ← lt_top_iff_ne_top,
have : (⊥ : ennreal) < ⊤ := ennreal.coe_lt_top,
simp [edist, this],
assume b,
rw lt_top_iff_ne_top,
exact edist_ne_top (x b) (y b) },
show ∀ (x y : Π (b : β), π b), ↑(sup univ (λ (b : β), nndist (x b) (y b))) =
ennreal.to_real (sup univ (λ (b : β), edist (x b) (y b))),
{ assume x y,
have : sup univ (λ (b : β), edist (x b) (y b)) = ↑(sup univ (λ (b : β), nndist (x b) (y b))),
{ simp [edist_nndist],
refine eq.symm (comp_sup_eq_sup_comp _ _ _),
exact (assume x y h, ennreal.coe_le_coe.2 h), refl },
rw this,
refl }
end
lemma dist_pi_def (f g : Πb, π b) :
dist f g = (sup univ (λb, nndist (f b) (g b)) : nnreal) := rfl
lemma dist_pi_lt_iff {f g : Πb, π b} {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
dist f g < r ↔ ∀b, dist (f b) (g b) < r :=
begin
lift r to nnreal using le_of_lt hr,
rw_mod_cast [dist_pi_def, finset.sup_lt_iff],
{ simp [nndist], refl },
{ exact hr }
end
lemma dist_pi_le_iff {f g : Πb, π b} {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
dist f g ≤ r ↔ ∀b, dist (f b) (g b) ≤ r :=
begin
lift r to nnreal using hr,
rw_mod_cast [dist_pi_def, finset.sup_le_iff],
simp [nndist],
refl
end
/-- An open ball in a product space is a product of open balls. The assumption `0 < r`
is necessary for the case of the empty product. -/
lemma ball_pi (x : Πb, π b) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
ball x r = { y | ∀b, y b ∈ ball (x b) r } :=
by { ext p, simp [dist_pi_lt_iff hr] }
/-- A closed ball in a product space is a product of closed balls. The assumption `0 ≤ r`
is necessary for the case of the empty product. -/
lemma closed_ball_pi (x : Πb, π b) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
closed_ball x r = { y | ∀b, y b ∈ closed_ball (x b) r } :=
by { ext p, simp [dist_pi_le_iff hr] }
end pi
section compact
/-- Any compact set in a metric space can be covered by finitely many balls of a given positive
radius -/
lemma finite_cover_balls_of_compact {α : Type u} [metric_space α] {s : set α}
(hs : compact s) {e : ℝ} (he : 0 < e) :
∃t ⊆ s, finite t ∧ s ⊆ ⋃x∈t, ball x e :=
begin
apply hs.elim_finite_subcover_image,
{ simp [is_open_ball] },
{ intros x xs,
simp,
exact ⟨x, ⟨xs, by simpa⟩⟩ }
end
alias finite_cover_balls_of_compact ← compact.finite_cover_balls
end compact
section proper_space
open metric
/-- A metric space is proper if all closed balls are compact. -/
class proper_space (α : Type u) [metric_space α] : Prop :=
(compact_ball : ∀x:α, ∀r, compact (closed_ball x r))
/-- If all closed balls of large enough radius are compact, then the space is proper. Especially
useful when the lower bound for the radius is 0. -/
lemma proper_space_of_compact_closed_ball_of_le
(R : ℝ) (h : ∀x:α, ∀r, R ≤ r → compact (closed_ball x r)) :
proper_space α :=
⟨begin
assume x r,
by_cases hr : R ≤ r,
{ exact h x r hr },
{ have : closed_ball x r = closed_ball x R ∩ closed_ball x r,
{ symmetry,
apply inter_eq_self_of_subset_right,
exact closed_ball_subset_closed_ball (le_of_lt (not_le.1 hr)) },
rw this,
exact (h x R (le_refl _)).inter_right is_closed_ball }
end⟩
/- A compact metric space is proper -/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance proper_of_compact [compact_space α] : proper_space α :=
⟨assume x r, compact_of_is_closed_subset compact_univ is_closed_ball (subset_univ _)⟩
/-- A proper space is locally compact -/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance locally_compact_of_proper [proper_space α] :
locally_compact_space α :=
begin
apply locally_compact_of_compact_nhds,
intros x,
existsi closed_ball x 1,
split,
{ apply mem_nhds_iff.2,
existsi (1 : ℝ),
simp,
exact ⟨zero_lt_one, ball_subset_closed_ball⟩ },
{ apply proper_space.compact_ball }
end
/-- A proper space is complete -/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance complete_of_proper [proper_space α] : complete_space α :=
⟨begin
intros f hf,
/- We want to show that the Cauchy filter `f` is converging. It suffices to find a closed
ball (therefore compact by properness) where it is nontrivial. -/
have A : ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ x y ∈ t, dist x y < 1 := (metric.cauchy_iff.1 hf).2 1 zero_lt_one,
rcases A with ⟨t, ⟨t_fset, ht⟩⟩,
rcases inhabited_of_mem_sets hf.1 t_fset with ⟨x, xt⟩,
have : t ⊆ closed_ball x 1 := by intros y yt; simp [dist_comm]; apply le_of_lt (ht x y xt yt),
have : closed_ball x 1 ∈ f := f.sets_of_superset t_fset this,
rcases (compact_iff_totally_bounded_complete.1 (proper_space.compact_ball x 1)).2 f hf (le_principal_iff.2 this)
with ⟨y, _, hy⟩,
exact ⟨y, hy⟩
end⟩
/-- A proper metric space is separable, and therefore second countable. Indeed, any ball is
compact, and therefore admits a countable dense subset. Taking a countable union over the balls
centered at a fixed point and with integer radius, one obtains a countable set which is
dense in the whole space. -/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance second_countable_of_proper [proper_space α] :
second_countable_topology α :=
begin
/- We show that the space admits a countable dense subset. The case where the space is empty
is special, and trivial. -/
have A : (univ : set α) = ∅ → ∃(s : set α), countable s ∧ closure s = (univ : set α) :=
assume H, ⟨∅, ⟨by simp, by simp; exact H.symm⟩⟩,
have B : (univ : set α) ≠ ∅ → ∃(s : set α), countable s ∧ closure s = (univ : set α) :=
begin
/- When the space is not empty, we take a point `x` in the space, and then a countable set
`T r` which is dense in the closed ball `closed_ball x r` for each `r`. Then the set
`t = ⋃ T n` (where the union is over all integers `n`) is countable, as a countable union
of countable sets, and dense in the space by construction. -/
assume non_empty,
rcases ne_empty_iff_exists_mem.1 non_empty with ⟨x, x_univ⟩,
choose T a using show ∀ (r:ℝ), ∃ t ⊆ closed_ball x r, (countable (t : set α) ∧ closed_ball x r = closure t),
from assume r, emetric.countable_closure_of_compact (proper_space.compact_ball _ _),
let t := (⋃n:ℕ, T (n : ℝ)),
have T₁ : countable t := by finish [countable_Union],
have T₂ : closure t ⊆ univ := by simp,
have T₃ : univ ⊆ closure t :=
begin
intros y y_univ,
rcases exists_nat_gt (dist y x) with ⟨n, n_large⟩,
have h : y ∈ closed_ball x (n : ℝ) := by simp; apply le_of_lt n_large,
have h' : closed_ball x (n : ℝ) = closure (T (n : ℝ)) := by finish,
have : y ∈ closure (T (n : ℝ)) := by rwa h' at h,
show y ∈ closure t, from mem_of_mem_of_subset this (by apply closure_mono; apply subset_Union (λ(n:ℕ), T (n:ℝ))),
end,
exact ⟨t, ⟨T₁, subset.antisymm T₂ T₃⟩⟩
end,
haveI : separable_space α := ⟨by_cases A B⟩,
apply emetric.second_countable_of_separable,
end
/-- A finite product of proper spaces is proper. -/
instance pi_proper_space {π : β → Type*} [fintype β] [∀b, metric_space (π b)]
[h : ∀b, proper_space (π b)] : proper_space (Πb, π b) :=
begin
refine proper_space_of_compact_closed_ball_of_le 0 (λx r hr, _),
rw closed_ball_pi _ hr,
apply compact_pi_infinite (λb, _),
apply (h b).compact_ball
end
end proper_space
namespace metric
section second_countable
open topological_space
/-- A metric space is second countable if, for every ε > 0, there is a countable set which is ε-dense. -/
lemma second_countable_of_almost_dense_set
(H : ∀ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃ s : set α, countable s ∧ (∀x, ∃y ∈ s, dist x y ≤ ε)) :
second_countable_topology α :=
begin
choose T T_dense using H,
have I1 : ∀n:ℕ, (n:ℝ) + 1 > 0 :=
λn, lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (le_add_of_nonneg_left (nat.cast_nonneg _)),
have I : ∀n:ℕ, (n+1 : ℝ)⁻¹ > 0 := λn, inv_pos'.2 (I1 n),
let t := ⋃n:ℕ, T (n+1)⁻¹ (I n),
have count_t : countable t := by finish [countable_Union],
have clos_t : closure t = univ,
{ refine subset.antisymm (subset_univ _) (λx xuniv, mem_closure_iff'.2 (λε εpos, _)),
rcases exists_nat_gt ε⁻¹ with ⟨n, hn⟩,
have : ε⁻¹ < n + 1 := lt_of_lt_of_le hn (le_add_of_nonneg_right zero_le_one),
have nε : ((n:ℝ)+1)⁻¹ < ε := (inv_lt (I1 n) εpos).2 this,
rcases (T_dense (n+1)⁻¹ (I n)).2 x with ⟨y, yT, Dxy⟩,
have : y ∈ t := mem_of_mem_of_subset yT (by apply subset_Union (λ (n:ℕ), T (n+1)⁻¹ (I n))),
exact ⟨y, this, lt_of_le_of_lt Dxy nε⟩ },
haveI : separable_space α := ⟨⟨t, ⟨count_t, clos_t⟩⟩⟩,
exact emetric.second_countable_of_separable α
end
/-- A metric space space is second countable if one can reconstruct up to any ε>0 any element of the
space from countably many data. -/
lemma second_countable_of_countable_discretization {α : Type u} [metric_space α]
(H : ∀ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃ (β : Type u) [encodable β] (F : α → β), ∀x y, F x = F y → dist x y ≤ ε) :
second_countable_topology α :=
begin
classical, by_cases hs : (univ : set α) = ∅,
{ haveI : compact_space α := ⟨by rw hs; exact compact_empty⟩, by apply_instance },
rcases exists_mem_of_ne_empty hs with ⟨x0, hx0⟩,
letI : inhabited α := ⟨x0⟩,
refine second_countable_of_almost_dense_set (λε ε0, _),
rcases H ε ε0 with ⟨β, fβ, F, hF⟩,
let Finv := function.inv_fun F,
refine ⟨range Finv, ⟨countable_range _, λx, _⟩⟩,
let x' := Finv (F x),
have : F x' = F x := function.inv_fun_eq ⟨x, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨x', mem_range_self _, hF _ _ this.symm⟩
end
end second_countable
end metric
lemma lebesgue_number_lemma_of_metric
{s : set α} {ι} {c : ι → set α} (hs : compact s)
(hc₁ : ∀ i, is_open (c i)) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃ i, c i) :
∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ i, ball x δ ⊆ c i :=
let ⟨n, en, hn⟩ := lebesgue_number_lemma hs hc₁ hc₂,
⟨δ, δ0, hδ⟩ := mem_uniformity_dist.1 en in
⟨δ, δ0, assume x hx, let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hn x hx in
⟨i, assume y hy, hi (hδ (mem_ball'.mp hy))⟩⟩
lemma lebesgue_number_lemma_of_metric_sUnion
{s : set α} {c : set (set α)} (hs : compact s)
(hc₁ : ∀ t ∈ c, is_open t) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃₀ c) :
∃ δ > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ c, ball x δ ⊆ t :=
by rw sUnion_eq_Union at hc₂;
simpa using lebesgue_number_lemma_of_metric hs (by simpa) hc₂
namespace metric
/-- Boundedness of a subset of a metric space. We formulate the definition to work
even in the empty space. -/
def bounded (s : set α) : Prop :=
∃C, ∀x y ∈ s, dist x y ≤ C
section bounded
variables {x : α} {s t : set α} {r : ℝ}
@[simp] lemma bounded_empty : bounded (∅ : set α) :=
⟨0, by simp⟩
lemma bounded_iff_mem_bounded : bounded s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, bounded s :=
⟨λ h _ _, h, λ H, begin
classical, by_cases s = ∅,
{ subst s, exact ⟨0, by simp⟩ },
{ rcases exists_mem_of_ne_empty h with ⟨x, hx⟩,
exact H x hx }
end⟩
/-- Subsets of a bounded set are also bounded -/
lemma bounded.subset (incl : s ⊆ t) : bounded t → bounded s :=
Exists.imp $ λ C hC x y hx hy, hC x y (incl hx) (incl hy)
/-- Closed balls are bounded -/
lemma bounded_closed_ball : bounded (closed_ball x r) :=
⟨r + r, λ y z hy hz, begin
simp only [mem_closed_ball] at *,
calc dist y z ≤ dist y x + dist z x : dist_triangle_right _ _ _
... ≤ r + r : add_le_add hy hz
end⟩
/-- Open balls are bounded -/
lemma bounded_ball : bounded (ball x r) :=
bounded_closed_ball.subset ball_subset_closed_ball
/-- Given a point, a bounded subset is included in some ball around this point -/
lemma bounded_iff_subset_ball (c : α) : bounded s ↔ ∃r, s ⊆ closed_ball c r :=
begin
split; rintro ⟨C, hC⟩,
{ classical, by_cases s = ∅,
{ subst s, exact ⟨0, by simp⟩ },
{ rcases exists_mem_of_ne_empty h with ⟨x, hx⟩,
exact ⟨C + dist x c, λ y hy, calc
dist y c ≤ dist y x + dist x c : dist_triangle _ _ _
... ≤ C + dist x c : add_le_add_right (hC y x hy hx) _⟩ } },
{ exact bounded_closed_ball.subset hC }
end
/-- The union of two bounded sets is bounded iff each of the sets is bounded -/
@[simp] lemma bounded_union :
bounded (s ∪ t) ↔ bounded s ∧ bounded t :=
⟨λh, ⟨h.subset (by simp), h.subset (by simp)⟩,
begin
rintro ⟨hs, ht⟩,
refine bounded_iff_mem_bounded.2 (λ x _, _),
rw bounded_iff_subset_ball x at hs ht ⊢,
rcases hs with ⟨Cs, hCs⟩, rcases ht with ⟨Ct, hCt⟩,
exact ⟨max Cs Ct, union_subset
(subset.trans hCs $ closed_ball_subset_closed_ball $ le_max_left _ _)
(subset.trans hCt $ closed_ball_subset_closed_ball $ le_max_right _ _)⟩,
end⟩
/-- A finite union of bounded sets is bounded -/
lemma bounded_bUnion {I : set β} {s : β → set α} (H : finite I) :
bounded (⋃i∈I, s i) ↔ ∀i ∈ I, bounded (s i) :=
finite.induction_on H (by simp) $ λ x I _ _ IH,
by simp [or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib, IH]
/-- A compact set is bounded -/
lemma bounded_of_compact {s : set α} (h : compact s) : bounded s :=
-- We cover the compact set by finitely many balls of radius 1,
-- and then argue that a finite union of bounded sets is bounded
let ⟨t, ht, fint, subs⟩ := finite_cover_balls_of_compact h zero_lt_one in
bounded.subset subs $ (bounded_bUnion fint).2 $ λ i hi, bounded_ball
alias bounded_of_compact ← compact.bounded
/-- A finite set is bounded -/
lemma bounded_of_finite {s : set α} (h : finite s) : bounded s :=
h.compact.bounded
/-- A singleton is bounded -/
lemma bounded_singleton {x : α} : bounded ({x} : set α) :=
bounded_of_finite $ finite_singleton _
/-- Characterization of the boundedness of the range of a function -/
lemma bounded_range_iff {f : β → α} : bounded (range f) ↔ ∃C, ∀x y, dist (f x) (f y) ≤ C :=
exists_congr $ λ C, ⟨
λ H x y, H _ _ ⟨x, rfl⟩ ⟨y, rfl⟩,
by rintro H _ _ ⟨x, rfl⟩ ⟨y, rfl⟩; exact H x y⟩
/-- In a compact space, all sets are bounded -/
lemma bounded_of_compact_space [compact_space α] : bounded s :=
compact_univ.bounded.subset (subset_univ _)
/-- In a proper space, a set is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded -/
lemma compact_iff_closed_bounded [proper_space α] :
compact s ↔ is_closed s ∧ bounded s :=
⟨λ h, ⟨closed_of_compact _ h, h.bounded⟩, begin
rintro ⟨hc, hb⟩,
classical, by_cases s = ∅, {simp [h, compact_empty]},
rcases exists_mem_of_ne_empty h with ⟨x, hx⟩,
rcases (bounded_iff_subset_ball x).1 hb with ⟨r, hr⟩,
exact compact_of_is_closed_subset (proper_space.compact_ball x r) hc hr
end⟩
/-- The image of a proper space under an expanding onto map is proper. -/
lemma proper_image_of_proper [proper_space α] [metric_space β] (f : α → β)
(f_cont : continuous f) (hf : range f = univ) (C : ℝ)
(hC : ∀x y, dist x y ≤ C * dist (f x) (f y)) : proper_space β :=
begin
apply proper_space_of_compact_closed_ball_of_le 0 (λx₀ r hr, _),
let K := f ⁻¹' (closed_ball x₀ r),
have A : is_closed K :=
continuous_iff_is_closed.1 f_cont (closed_ball x₀ r) (is_closed_ball),
have B : bounded K := ⟨max C 0 * (r + r), λx y hx hy, calc
dist x y ≤ C * dist (f x) (f y) : hC x y
... ≤ max C 0 * dist (f x) (f y) : mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (le_max_left _ _) (dist_nonneg)
... ≤ max C 0 * (dist (f x) x₀ + dist (f y) x₀) :
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (dist_triangle_right (f x) (f y) x₀) (le_max_right _ _)
... ≤ max C 0 * (r + r) : begin
simp only [mem_closed_ball, mem_preimage] at hx hy,
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (add_le_add hx hy) (le_max_right _ _)
end⟩,
have : compact K := compact_iff_closed_bounded.2 ⟨A, B⟩,
have C : compact (f '' K) := this.image f_cont,
have : f '' K = closed_ball x₀ r,
by { rw image_preimage_eq_of_subset, rw hf, exact subset_univ _ },
rwa this at C
end
end bounded
section diam
variables {s : set α} {x y : α}
/-- The diameter of a set in a metric space. To get controllable behavior even when the diameter
should be infinite, we express it in terms of the emetric.diameter -/
def diam (s : set α) : ℝ := ennreal.to_real (emetric.diam s)
/-- The diameter of a set is always nonnegative -/
lemma diam_nonneg : 0 ≤ diam s :=
by simp [diam]
/-- The empty set has zero diameter -/
@[simp] lemma diam_empty : diam (∅ : set α) = 0 :=
by simp [diam]
/-- A singleton has zero diameter -/
@[simp] lemma diam_singleton : diam ({x} : set α) = 0 :=
by simp [diam]
/-- Characterize the boundedness of a set in terms of the finiteness of its emetric.diameter. -/
lemma bounded_iff_diam_ne_top : bounded s ↔ emetric.diam s ≠ ⊤ :=
begin
classical, by_cases hs : s = ∅,
{ simp [hs] },
{ rcases ne_empty_iff_exists_mem.1 hs with ⟨x, hx⟩,
split,
{ assume bs,
rcases (bounded_iff_subset_ball x).1 bs with ⟨r, hr⟩,
have r0 : 0 ≤ r := by simpa [closed_ball] using hr hx,
have : emetric.diam s < ⊤ := calc
emetric.diam s ≤ emetric.diam (emetric.closed_ball x (ennreal.of_real r)) :
by rw emetric_closed_ball r0; exact emetric.diam_mono hr
... ≤ 2 * (ennreal.of_real r) : emetric.diam_closed_ball
... < ⊤ : begin apply ennreal.lt_top_iff_ne_top.2, simp [ennreal.mul_eq_top], end,
exact ennreal.lt_top_iff_ne_top.1 this },
{ assume ds,
have : s ⊆ closed_ball x (ennreal.to_real (emetric.diam s)),
{ rw [← emetric_closed_ball ennreal.to_real_nonneg, ennreal.of_real_to_real ds],
exact λy hy, emetric.edist_le_diam_of_mem hy hx },
exact bounded.subset this (bounded_closed_ball) }}
end
/-- An unbounded set has zero diameter. If you would prefer to get the value ∞, use `emetric.diam`.
This lemma makes it possible to avoid side conditions in some situations -/
lemma diam_eq_zero_of_unbounded (h : ¬(bounded s)) : diam s = 0 :=
begin
simp only [bounded_iff_diam_ne_top, not_not, ne.def] at h,
simp [diam, h]
end
/-- If `s ⊆ t`, then the diameter of `s` is bounded by that of `t`, provided `t` is bounded. -/
lemma diam_mono {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) (ht : bounded t) : diam s ≤ diam t :=
begin
unfold diam,
rw ennreal.to_real_le_to_real (bounded_iff_diam_ne_top.1 (bounded.subset h ht)) (bounded_iff_diam_ne_top.1 ht),
exact emetric.diam_mono h
end
/-- The distance between two points in a set is controlled by the diameter of the set. -/
lemma dist_le_diam_of_mem (h : bounded s) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : dist x y ≤ diam s :=
begin
rw [diam, dist_edist],
rw ennreal.to_real_le_to_real (edist_ne_top _ _) (bounded_iff_diam_ne_top.1 h),
exact emetric.edist_le_diam_of_mem hx hy
end
/-- If the distance between any two points in a set is bounded by some constant, this constant
bounds the diameter. -/
lemma diam_le_of_forall_dist_le {d : real} (hd : d ≥ 0) (h : ∀x y ∈ s, dist x y ≤ d) : diam s ≤ d :=
begin
have I : emetric.diam s ≤ ennreal.of_real d,
{ refine emetric.diam_le_of_forall_edist_le (λx y hx hy, _),
rw [edist_dist],
exact ennreal.of_real_le_of_real (h x y hx hy) },
have A : emetric.diam s ≠ ⊤ :=
ennreal.lt_top_iff_ne_top.1 (lt_of_le_of_lt I (ennreal.lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 (by simp))),
rw [← ennreal.to_real_of_real hd, diam, ennreal.to_real_le_to_real A],
{ exact I },
{ simp }
end
/-- The diameter of a union is controlled by the sum of the diameters, and the distance between
any two points in each of the sets. This lemma is true without any side condition, since it is
obviously true if `s ∪ t` is unbounded. -/
lemma diam_union {t : set α} (xs : x ∈ s) (yt : y ∈ t) : diam (s ∪ t) ≤ diam s + dist x y + diam t :=
have I1 : ¬(bounded (s ∪ t)) → diam (s ∪ t) ≤ diam s + dist x y + diam t := λh, calc
diam (s ∪ t) = 0 + 0 + 0 : by simp [diam_eq_zero_of_unbounded h]
... ≤ diam s + dist x y + diam t : add_le_add (add_le_add diam_nonneg dist_nonneg) diam_nonneg,
have I2 : (bounded (s ∪ t)) → diam (s ∪ t) ≤ diam s + dist x y + diam t := λh,
begin
have : bounded s := bounded.subset (subset_union_left _ _) h,
have : bounded t := bounded.subset (subset_union_right _ _) h,
have A : ∀a ∈ s, ∀b ∈ t, dist a b ≤ diam s + dist x y + diam t := λa ha b hb, calc
dist a b ≤ dist a x + dist x y + dist y b : dist_triangle4 _ _ _ _
... ≤ diam s + dist x y + diam t :
add_le_add (add_le_add (dist_le_diam_of_mem ‹bounded s› ha xs) (le_refl _)) (dist_le_diam_of_mem ‹bounded t› yt hb),
have B : ∀a b ∈ s ∪ t, dist a b ≤ diam s + dist x y + diam t := λa b ha hb,
begin
cases (mem_union _ _ _).1 ha with h'a h'a; cases (mem_union _ _ _).1 hb with h'b h'b,
{ calc dist a b ≤ diam s : dist_le_diam_of_mem ‹bounded s› h'a h'b
... = diam s + (0 + 0) : by simp
... ≤ diam s + (dist x y + diam t) : add_le_add (le_refl _) (add_le_add dist_nonneg diam_nonneg)
... = diam s + dist x y + diam t : by simp only [add_comm, eq_self_iff_true, add_left_comm] },
{ exact A a h'a b h'b },
{ have Z := A b h'b a h'a, rwa [dist_comm] at Z },
{ calc dist a b ≤ diam t : dist_le_diam_of_mem ‹bounded t› h'a h'b
... = (0 + 0) + diam t : by simp
... ≤ (diam s + dist x y) + diam t : add_le_add (add_le_add diam_nonneg dist_nonneg) (le_refl _) }
end,
have C : 0 ≤ diam s + dist x y + diam t := calc
0 = 0 + 0 + 0 : by simp
... ≤ diam s + dist x y + diam t : add_le_add (add_le_add diam_nonneg dist_nonneg) diam_nonneg,
exact diam_le_of_forall_dist_le C B
end,
classical.by_cases I2 I1
/-- If two sets intersect, the diameter of the union is bounded by the sum of the diameters. -/
lemma diam_union' {t : set α} (h : s ∩ t ≠ ∅) : diam (s ∪ t) ≤ diam s + diam t :=
begin
rcases ne_empty_iff_exists_mem.1 h with ⟨x, ⟨xs, xt⟩⟩,
simpa using diam_union xs xt
end
/-- The diameter of a closed ball of radius `r` is at most `2 r`. -/
lemma diam_closed_ball {r : ℝ} (h : r ≥ 0) : diam (closed_ball x r) ≤ 2 * r :=
diam_le_of_forall_dist_le (mul_nonneg (by norm_num) h) $ λa b ha hb, calc
dist a b ≤ dist a x + dist b x : dist_triangle_right _ _ _
... ≤ r + r : add_le_add ha hb
... = 2 * r : by simp [mul_two, mul_comm]
/-- The diameter of a ball of radius `r` is at most `2 r`. -/
lemma diam_ball {r : ℝ} (h : r ≥ 0) : diam (ball x r) ≤ 2 * r :=
le_trans (diam_mono ball_subset_closed_ball bounded_closed_ball) (diam_closed_ball h)
end diam
end metric
|
fc636c9013badd14325bb8453ff8006530e8b088 | b7f22e51856f4989b970961f794f1c435f9b8f78 | /tests/lean/gen_bug.lean | 66e30f56543c371fed77ee751814e9635e8317d4 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean | cb8aa01055ffe2af0fb99a16b4cda8463b882cd1 | 38607e3eb57f57f77c0ac114ad169e9e4262e24f | refs/heads/master | 1,611,187,284,081 | 1,450,766,737,000 | 1,476,122,547,000 | 11,513,992 | 2 | 0 | null | 1,401,763,102,000 | 1,374,182,235,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 425 | lean | import logic
set_option pp.notation false
set_option pp.implicit true
theorem tst (A B : Type) (a : A) (b : B) : a == b → b == a :=
begin
intro H,
generalize B, -- Should produce an error
intro B',
apply (heq.symm H),
end
theorem tst2 (A B : Type) (a : A) (b : B) : a == b → b == a :=
begin
generalize a,
generalize b,
generalize B,
intro B',
intro b,
intro a,
intro H,
apply (heq.symm H),
end
|
672711ec692fa4ff0b4adfaac1679ca96a7cf7ec | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/order/directed.lean | 11f44fa57d2206d2f9396320aaa52d62d40351b7 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,965 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import data.set.basic
import order.lattice
import order.max
/-!
# Directed indexed families and sets
This file defines directed indexed families and directed sets. An indexed family/set is
directed iff each pair of elements has a shared upper bound.
## Main declarations
* `directed r f`: Predicate stating that the indexed family `f` is `r`-directed.
* `directed_on r s`: Predicate stating that the set `s` is `r`-directed.
* `is_directed α r`: Prop-valued mixin stating that `α` is `r`-directed. Follows the style of the
unbundled relation classes such as `is_total`.
-/
open function
universes u v w
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {ι : Sort w} (r s : α → α → Prop)
local infix ` ≼ ` : 50 := r
/-- A family of elements of α is directed (with respect to a relation `≼` on α)
if there is a member of the family `≼`-above any pair in the family. -/
def directed (f : ι → α) := ∀ x y, ∃ z, f x ≼ f z ∧ f y ≼ f z
/-- A subset of α is directed if there is an element of the set `≼`-above any
pair of elements in the set. -/
def directed_on (s : set α) := ∀ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), ∃ z ∈ s, x ≼ z ∧ y ≼ z
variables {r}
theorem directed_on_iff_directed {s} : @directed_on α r s ↔ directed r (coe : s → α) :=
by simp [directed, directed_on]; refine ball_congr (λ x hx, by simp; refl)
alias directed_on_iff_directed ↔ directed_on.directed_coe _
theorem directed_on_image {s} {f : β → α} :
directed_on r (f '' s) ↔ directed_on (f ⁻¹'o r) s :=
by simp only [directed_on, set.ball_image_iff, set.bex_image_iff, order.preimage]
theorem directed_on.mono {s : set α} (h : directed_on r s)
{r' : α → α → Prop} (H : ∀ {a b}, r a b → r' a b) :
directed_on r' s :=
λ x hx y hy, let ⟨z, zs, xz, yz⟩ := h x hx y hy in ⟨z, zs, H xz, H yz⟩
theorem directed_comp {ι} {f : ι → β} {g : β → α} :
directed r (g ∘ f) ↔ directed (g ⁻¹'o r) f := iff.rfl
theorem directed.mono {s : α → α → Prop} {ι} {f : ι → α}
(H : ∀ a b, r a b → s a b) (h : directed r f) : directed s f :=
λ a b, let ⟨c, h₁, h₂⟩ := h a b in ⟨c, H _ _ h₁, H _ _ h₂⟩
theorem directed.mono_comp {ι} {rb : β → β → Prop} {g : α → β} {f : ι → α}
(hg : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, x ≼ y → rb (g x) (g y)) (hf : directed r f) :
directed rb (g ∘ f) :=
directed_comp.2 $ hf.mono hg
/-- A monotone function on a sup-semilattice is directed. -/
lemma directed_of_sup [semilattice_sup α] {f : α → β} {r : β → β → Prop}
(H : ∀ ⦃i j⦄, i ≤ j → r (f i) (f j)) : directed r f :=
λ a b, ⟨a ⊔ b, H le_sup_left, H le_sup_right⟩
lemma monotone.directed_le [semilattice_sup α] [preorder β] {f : α → β} :
monotone f → directed (≤) f :=
directed_of_sup
lemma directed.extend_bot [preorder α] [order_bot α] {e : ι → β} {f : ι → α}
(hf : directed (≤) f) (he : function.injective e) :
directed (≤) (function.extend e f ⊥) :=
begin
intros a b,
rcases (em (∃ i, e i = a)).symm with ha | ⟨i, rfl⟩,
{ use b, simp [function.extend_apply' _ _ _ ha] },
rcases (em (∃ i, e i = b)).symm with hb | ⟨j, rfl⟩,
{ use e i, simp [function.extend_apply' _ _ _ hb] },
rcases hf i j with ⟨k, hi, hj⟩,
use (e k),
simp only [function.extend_apply he, *, true_and]
end
/-- An antitone function on an inf-semilattice is directed. -/
lemma directed_of_inf [semilattice_inf α] {r : β → β → Prop} {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ a₁ a₂, a₁ ≤ a₂ → r (f a₂) (f a₁)) : directed r f :=
λ x y, ⟨x ⊓ y, hf _ _ inf_le_left, hf _ _ inf_le_right⟩
/-- `is_directed α r` states that for any elements `a`, `b` there exists an element `c` such that
`r a c` and `r b c`. -/
class is_directed (α : Type*) (r : α → α → Prop) : Prop :=
(directed (a b : α) : ∃ c, r a c ∧ r b c)
lemma directed_of (r : α → α → Prop) [is_directed α r] (a b : α) : ∃ c, r a c ∧ r b c :=
is_directed.directed _ _
lemma directed_id [is_directed α r] : directed r id := by convert directed_of r
lemma directed_id_iff : directed r id ↔ is_directed α r := ⟨λ h, ⟨h⟩, @directed_id _ _⟩
lemma directed_on_univ [is_directed α r] : directed_on r set.univ :=
λ a _ b _, let ⟨c, hc⟩ := directed_of r a b in ⟨c, trivial, hc⟩
lemma directed_on_univ_iff : directed_on r set.univ ↔ is_directed α r :=
⟨λ h, ⟨λ a b, let ⟨c, _, hc⟩ := h a trivial b trivial in ⟨c, hc⟩⟩, @directed_on_univ _ _⟩
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance is_total.to_is_directed [is_total α r] : is_directed α r :=
⟨λ a b, or.cases_on (total_of r a b) (λ h, ⟨b, h, refl _⟩) (λ h, ⟨a, refl _, h⟩)⟩
lemma is_directed_mono [is_directed α r] (h : ∀ ⦃a b⦄, r a b → s a b) : is_directed α s :=
⟨λ a b, let ⟨c, ha, hb⟩ := is_directed.directed a b in ⟨c, h ha, h hb⟩⟩
lemma exists_ge_ge [has_le α] [is_directed α (≤)] (a b : α) : ∃ c, a ≤ c ∧ b ≤ c :=
directed_of (≤) a b
lemma exists_le_le [has_le α] [is_directed α (swap (≤))] (a b : α) : ∃ c, c ≤ a ∧ c ≤ b :=
directed_of (swap (≤)) a b
instance order_dual.is_directed_ge [has_le α] [is_directed α (≤)] : is_directed αᵒᵈ (swap (≤)) :=
by assumption
instance order_dual.is_directed_le [has_le α] [is_directed α (swap (≤))] : is_directed αᵒᵈ (≤) :=
by assumption
section preorder
variables [preorder α] {a : α}
protected lemma is_min.is_bot [is_directed α (swap (≤))] (h : is_min a) : is_bot a :=
λ b, let ⟨c, hca, hcb⟩ := exists_le_le a b in (h hca).trans hcb
protected lemma is_max.is_top [is_directed α (≤)] (h : is_max a) : is_top a :=
λ b, let ⟨c, hac, hbc⟩ := exists_ge_ge a b in hbc.trans $ h hac
lemma is_bot_iff_is_min [is_directed α (swap (≤))] : is_bot a ↔ is_min a :=
⟨is_bot.is_min, is_min.is_bot⟩
lemma is_top_iff_is_max [is_directed α (≤)] : is_top a ↔ is_max a := ⟨is_top.is_max, is_max.is_top⟩
end preorder
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance semilattice_sup.to_is_directed_le [semilattice_sup α] : is_directed α (≤) :=
⟨λ a b, ⟨a ⊔ b, le_sup_left, le_sup_right⟩⟩
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance semilattice_inf.to_is_directed_ge [semilattice_inf α] : is_directed α (swap (≤)) :=
⟨λ a b, ⟨a ⊓ b, inf_le_left, inf_le_right⟩⟩
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance order_top.to_is_directed_le [has_le α] [order_top α] : is_directed α (≤) :=
⟨λ a b, ⟨⊤, le_top, le_top⟩⟩
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance order_bot.to_is_directed_ge [has_le α] [order_bot α] : is_directed α (swap (≤)) :=
⟨λ a b, ⟨⊥, bot_le, bot_le⟩⟩
|
a104b5c902c03e7427ec0eb366b1700c83a3448a | 31f556cdeb9239ffc2fad8f905e33987ff4feab9 | /src/Lean/PrettyPrinter/Delaborator/TopDownAnalyze.lean | 3b1134f7e623af4f12879a9000915aea35a03e66 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | tobiasgrosser/lean4 | ce0fd9cca0feba1100656679bf41f0bffdbabb71 | ebdbdc10436a4d9d6b66acf78aae7a23f5bd073f | refs/heads/master | 1,673,103,412,948 | 1,664,930,501,000 | 1,664,930,501,000 | 186,870,185 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,665,129,237,000 | 1,557,939,901,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 27,137 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Daniel Selsam
-/
import Lean.Data.RBMap
import Lean.Meta.SynthInstance
import Lean.Util.FindMVar
import Lean.Util.FindLevelMVar
import Lean.Util.CollectLevelParams
import Lean.Util.ReplaceLevel
import Lean.PrettyPrinter.Delaborator.Options
import Lean.PrettyPrinter.Delaborator.SubExpr
import Lean.Elab.Config
/-!
The top-down analyzer is an optional preprocessor to the delaborator that aims
to determine the minimal annotations necessary to ensure that the delaborated
expression can be re-elaborated correctly. Currently, the top-down analyzer
is neither sound nor complete: there may be edge-cases in which the expression
can still not be re-elaborated correctly, and it may also add many annotations
that are not strictly necessary.
-/
namespace Lean
open Meta SubExpr
register_builtin_option pp.analyze : Bool := {
defValue := false
group := "pp.analyze"
descr := "(pretty printer analyzer) determine annotations sufficient to ensure round-tripping"
}
register_builtin_option pp.analyze.checkInstances : Bool := {
-- TODO: It would be great to make this default to `true`, but currently, `MessageData` does not
-- include the `LocalInstances`, so this will be very over-aggressive in inserting instances
-- that would otherwise be easy to synthesize. We may consider threading the instances in the future,
-- or at least tracking a bool for whether the instances have been lost.
defValue := false
group := "pp.analyze"
descr := "(pretty printer analyzer) confirm that instances can be re-synthesized"
}
register_builtin_option pp.analyze.typeAscriptions : Bool := {
defValue := true
group := "pp.analyze"
descr := "(pretty printer analyzer) add type ascriptions when deemed necessary"
}
register_builtin_option pp.analyze.trustSubst : Bool := {
defValue := false
group := "pp.analyze"
descr := "(pretty printer analyzer) always 'pretend' applications that can delab to ▸ are 'regular'"
}
register_builtin_option pp.analyze.trustOfNat : Bool := {
defValue := true
group := "pp.analyze"
descr := "(pretty printer analyzer) always 'pretend' `OfNat.ofNat` applications can elab bottom-up"
}
register_builtin_option pp.analyze.trustOfScientific : Bool := {
defValue := true
group := "pp.analyze"
descr := "(pretty printer analyzer) always 'pretend' `OfScientific.ofScientific` applications can elab bottom-up"
}
-- TODO: this is an arbitrary special case of a more general principle.
register_builtin_option pp.analyze.trustSubtypeMk : Bool := {
defValue := true
group := "pp.analyze"
descr := "(pretty printer analyzer) assume the implicit arguments of Subtype.mk can be inferred"
}
register_builtin_option pp.analyze.trustId : Bool := {
defValue := true
group := "pp.analyze"
descr := "(pretty printer analyzer) always assume an implicit `fun x => x` can be inferred"
}
register_builtin_option pp.analyze.trustKnownFOType2TypeHOFuns : Bool := {
defValue := true
group := "pp.analyze"
descr := "(pretty printer analyzer) omit higher-order functions whose values seem to be knownType2Type"
}
register_builtin_option pp.analyze.omitMax : Bool := {
defValue := true
group := "pp.analyze"
descr := "(pretty printer analyzer) omit universe `max` annotations (these constraints can actually hurt)"
}
register_builtin_option pp.analyze.knowsType : Bool := {
defValue := true
group := "pp.analyze"
descr := "(pretty printer analyzer) assume the type of the original expression is known"
}
register_builtin_option pp.analyze.explicitHoles : Bool := {
defValue := false
group := "pp.analyze"
descr := "(pretty printer analyzer) use `_` for explicit arguments that can be inferred"
}
def getPPAnalyze (o : Options) : Bool := o.get pp.analyze.name pp.analyze.defValue
def getPPAnalyzeCheckInstances (o : Options) : Bool := o.get pp.analyze.checkInstances.name pp.analyze.checkInstances.defValue
def getPPAnalyzeTypeAscriptions (o : Options) : Bool := o.get pp.analyze.typeAscriptions.name pp.analyze.typeAscriptions.defValue
def getPPAnalyzeTrustSubst (o : Options) : Bool := o.get pp.analyze.trustSubst.name pp.analyze.trustSubst.defValue
def getPPAnalyzeTrustOfNat (o : Options) : Bool := o.get pp.analyze.trustOfNat.name pp.analyze.trustOfNat.defValue
def getPPAnalyzeTrustOfScientific (o : Options) : Bool := o.get pp.analyze.trustOfScientific.name pp.analyze.trustOfScientific.defValue
def getPPAnalyzeTrustId (o : Options) : Bool := o.get pp.analyze.trustId.name pp.analyze.trustId.defValue
def getPPAnalyzeTrustSubtypeMk (o : Options) : Bool := o.get pp.analyze.trustSubtypeMk.name pp.analyze.trustSubtypeMk.defValue
def getPPAnalyzeTrustKnownFOType2TypeHOFuns (o : Options) : Bool := o.get pp.analyze.trustKnownFOType2TypeHOFuns.name pp.analyze.trustKnownFOType2TypeHOFuns.defValue
def getPPAnalyzeOmitMax (o : Options) : Bool := o.get pp.analyze.omitMax.name pp.analyze.omitMax.defValue
def getPPAnalyzeKnowsType (o : Options) : Bool := o.get pp.analyze.knowsType.name pp.analyze.knowsType.defValue
def getPPAnalyzeExplicitHoles (o : Options) : Bool := o.get pp.analyze.explicitHoles.name pp.analyze.explicitHoles.defValue
def getPPAnalysisSkip (o : Options) : Bool := o.get `pp.analysis.skip false
def getPPAnalysisHole (o : Options) : Bool := o.get `pp.analysis.hole false
def getPPAnalysisNamedArg (o : Options) : Bool := o.get `pp.analysis.namedArg false
def getPPAnalysisLetVarType (o : Options) : Bool := o.get `pp.analysis.letVarType false
def getPPAnalysisNeedsType (o : Options) : Bool := o.get `pp.analysis.needsType false
def getPPAnalysisBlockImplicit (o : Options) : Bool := o.get `pp.analysis.blockImplicit false
namespace PrettyPrinter.Delaborator
def returnsPi (motive : Expr) : MetaM Bool := do
lambdaTelescope motive fun _ b => return b.isForall
def isNonConstFun (motive : Expr) : MetaM Bool := do
match motive with
| Expr.lam _ _ b _ => isNonConstFun b
| _ => return motive.hasLooseBVars
def isSimpleHOFun (motive : Expr) : MetaM Bool :=
return not (← returnsPi motive) && not (← isNonConstFun motive)
def isType2Type (motive : Expr) : MetaM Bool := do
match ← inferType motive with
| Expr.forallE _ (Expr.sort ..) (Expr.sort ..) .. => return true
| _ => return false
def isFOLike (motive : Expr) : MetaM Bool := do
let f := motive.getAppFn
return f.isFVar || f.isConst
def isIdLike (arg : Expr) : Bool :=
-- TODO: allow `id` constant as well?
match arg with
| Expr.lam _ _ (Expr.bvar ..) .. => true
| _ => false
def isStructureInstance (e : Expr) : MetaM Bool := do
match e.isConstructorApp? (← getEnv) with
| some s => return isStructure (← getEnv) s.induct
| none => return false
namespace TopDownAnalyze
partial def hasMVarAtCurrDepth (e : Expr) : MetaM Bool := do
let mctx ← getMCtx
return Option.isSome <| e.findMVar? fun mvarId =>
match mctx.findDecl? mvarId with
| some mdecl => mdecl.depth == mctx.depth
| _ => false
partial def hasLevelMVarAtCurrDepth (e : Expr) : MetaM Bool := do
let mctx ← getMCtx
return Option.isSome <| e.findLevelMVar? fun mvarId =>
mctx.findLevelDepth? mvarId == some mctx.depth
private def valUnknown (e : Expr) : MetaM Bool := do
hasMVarAtCurrDepth (← instantiateMVars e)
private def typeUnknown (e : Expr) : MetaM Bool := do
valUnknown (← inferType e)
def isHBinOp (e : Expr) : Bool := Id.run do
-- TODO: instead of tracking these explicitly,
-- consider a more general solution that checks for defaultInstances
if e.getAppNumArgs != 6 then return false
let f := e.getAppFn
if !f.isConst then return false
-- Note: we leave out `HPow.hPow because we expect its homogeneous
-- version will change soon
let ops := #[
`HOr.hOr, `HXor.hXor, `HAnd.hAnd,
`HAppend.hAppend, `HOrElse.hOrElse, `HAndThen.hAndThen,
`HAdd.hAdd, `HSub.hSub, `HMul.hMul, `HDiv.hDiv, `HMod.hMod,
`HShiftLeft.hShiftLeft, `HShiftRight]
ops.any fun op => op == f.constName!
def replaceLPsWithVars (e : Expr) : MetaM Expr := do
if !e.hasLevelParam then return e
let lps := collectLevelParams {} e |>.params
let mut replaceMap : HashMap Name Level := {}
for lp in lps do replaceMap := replaceMap.insert lp (← mkFreshLevelMVar)
return e.replaceLevel fun
| Level.param n .. => replaceMap.find! n
| l => if !l.hasParam then some l else none
def isDefEqAssigning (t s : Expr) : MetaM Bool := do
withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with config := { ctx.config with assignSyntheticOpaque := true }}) $
Meta.isDefEq t s
def checkpointDefEq (t s : Expr) : MetaM Bool := do
Meta.checkpointDefEq (mayPostpone := false) do
isDefEqAssigning t s
def isHigherOrder (type : Expr) : MetaM Bool := do
forallTelescopeReducing type fun xs b => return xs.size > 0 && b.isSort
def isFunLike (e : Expr) : MetaM Bool := do
forallTelescopeReducing (← inferType e) fun xs _ => return xs.size > 0
def isSubstLike (e : Expr) : Bool :=
e.isAppOfArity ``Eq.ndrec 6 || e.isAppOfArity ``Eq.rec 6
def nameNotRoundtrippable (n : Name) : Bool :=
n.hasMacroScopes || isPrivateName n || containsNum n
where
containsNum
| Name.str p .. => containsNum p
| Name.num .. => true
| Name.anonymous => false
def mvarName (mvar : Expr) : MetaM Name :=
return (← mvar.mvarId!.getDecl).userName
def containsBadMax : Level → Bool
| Level.succ u .. => containsBadMax u
| Level.max u v .. => (u.hasParam && v.hasParam) || containsBadMax u || containsBadMax v
| Level.imax u v .. => (u.hasParam && v.hasParam) || containsBadMax u || containsBadMax v
| _ => false
open SubExpr
structure Context where
knowsType : Bool
knowsLevel : Bool -- only constants look at this
inBottomUp : Bool := false
parentIsApp : Bool := false
subExpr : SubExpr
deriving Inhabited
structure State where
annotations : OptionsPerPos := {}
postponed : Array (Expr × Expr) := #[] -- not currently used
abbrev AnalyzeM := ReaderT Context (StateRefT State MetaM)
instance (priority := low) : MonadReaderOf SubExpr AnalyzeM where
read := Context.subExpr <$> read
instance (priority := low) : MonadWithReaderOf SubExpr AnalyzeM where
withReader f x := fun ctx => x { ctx with subExpr := f ctx.subExpr }
def tryUnify (e₁ e₂ : Expr) : AnalyzeM Unit := do
try
let r ← isDefEqAssigning e₁ e₂
if !r then modify fun s => { s with postponed := s.postponed.push (e₁, e₂) }
pure ()
catch _ =>
modify fun s => { s with postponed := s.postponed.push (e₁, e₂) }
partial def inspectOutParams (arg mvar : Expr) : AnalyzeM Unit := do
let argType ← inferType arg -- HAdd α α α
let mvarType ← inferType mvar
let fType ← inferType argType.getAppFn -- Type → Type → outParam Type
let mType ← inferType mvarType.getAppFn
inspectAux fType mType 0 argType.getAppArgs mvarType.getAppArgs
where
inspectAux (fType mType : Expr) (i : Nat) (args mvars : Array Expr) := do
let fType ← whnf fType
let mType ← whnf mType
if not (i < args.size) then return ()
match fType, mType with
| Expr.forallE _ fd fb _, Expr.forallE _ _ mb _ => do
-- TODO: do I need to check (← okBottomUp? args[i] mvars[i] fuel).isSafe here?
-- if so, I'll need to take a callback
if fd.isOutParam then
tryUnify (args[i]!) (mvars[i]!)
inspectAux (fb.instantiate1 args[i]!) (mb.instantiate1 mvars[i]!) (i+1) args mvars
| _, _ => return ()
partial def isTrivialBottomUp (e : Expr) : AnalyzeM Bool := do
let opts ← getOptions
return e.isFVar
|| e.isConst || e.isMVar || e.isNatLit || e.isStringLit || e.isSort
|| (getPPAnalyzeTrustOfNat opts && e.isAppOfArity ``OfNat.ofNat 3)
|| (getPPAnalyzeTrustOfScientific opts && e.isAppOfArity ``OfScientific.ofScientific 5)
partial def canBottomUp (e : Expr) (mvar? : Option Expr := none) (fuel : Nat := 10) : AnalyzeM Bool := do
-- Here we check if `e` can be safely elaborated without its expected type.
-- These are incomplete (and possibly unsound) heuristics.
-- TODO: do I need to snapshot the state before calling this?
match fuel with
| 0 => return false
| fuel + 1 =>
if ← isTrivialBottomUp e then return true
let f := e.getAppFn
if !f.isConst && !f.isFVar then return false
let args := e.getAppArgs
let fType ← replaceLPsWithVars (← inferType e.getAppFn)
let (mvars, bInfos, resultType) ← forallMetaBoundedTelescope fType e.getAppArgs.size
for i in [:mvars.size] do
if bInfos[i]! == BinderInfo.instImplicit then
inspectOutParams args[i]! mvars[i]!
else if bInfos[i]! == BinderInfo.default then
if ← isTrivialBottomUp args[i]! then tryUnify args[i]! mvars[i]!
else if ← typeUnknown mvars[i]! <&&> canBottomUp args[i]! (some mvars[i]!) fuel then tryUnify args[i]! mvars[i]!
if ← (pure (isHBinOp e) <&&> (valUnknown mvars[0]! <||> valUnknown mvars[1]!)) then tryUnify mvars[0]! mvars[1]!
if mvar?.isSome then tryUnify resultType (← inferType mvar?.get!)
return !(← valUnknown resultType)
def withKnowing (knowsType knowsLevel : Bool) (x : AnalyzeM α) : AnalyzeM α := do
withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with knowsType := knowsType, knowsLevel := knowsLevel }) x
builtin_initialize analyzeFailureId : InternalExceptionId ← registerInternalExceptionId `analyzeFailure
def checkKnowsType : AnalyzeM Unit := do
if not (← read).knowsType then
throw $ Exception.internal analyzeFailureId
def annotateBoolAt (n : Name) (pos : Pos) : AnalyzeM Unit := do
let opts := (← get).annotations.findD pos {} |>.setBool n true
trace[pp.analyze.annotate] "{pos} {n}"
modify fun s => { s with annotations := s.annotations.insert pos opts }
def annotateBool (n : Name) : AnalyzeM Unit := do
annotateBoolAt n (← getPos)
structure App.Context where
f : Expr
fType : Expr
args : Array Expr
mvars : Array Expr
bInfos : Array BinderInfo
forceRegularApp : Bool
structure App.State where
bottomUps : Array Bool
higherOrders : Array Bool
funBinders : Array Bool
provideds : Array Bool
namedArgs : Array Name := #[]
abbrev AnalyzeAppM := ReaderT App.Context (StateT App.State AnalyzeM)
mutual
partial def analyze (parentIsApp : Bool := false) : AnalyzeM Unit := do
checkMaxHeartbeats "Delaborator.topDownAnalyze"
trace[pp.analyze] "{(← read).knowsType}.{(← read).knowsLevel}"
let e ← getExpr
let opts ← getOptions
if ← (pure !e.isAtomic) <&&> pure !(getPPProofs opts) <&&> (try Meta.isProof e catch _ => pure false) then
if getPPProofsWithType opts then
withType $ withKnowing true true $ analyze
return ()
else
withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with parentIsApp := parentIsApp }) do
match (← getExpr) with
| Expr.app .. => analyzeApp
| Expr.forallE .. => analyzePi
| Expr.lam .. => analyzeLam
| Expr.const .. => analyzeConst
| Expr.sort .. => analyzeSort
| Expr.proj .. => analyzeProj
| Expr.fvar .. => analyzeFVar
| Expr.mdata .. => analyzeMData
| Expr.letE .. => analyzeLet
| Expr.lit .. => pure ()
| Expr.mvar .. => pure ()
| Expr.bvar .. => pure ()
where
analyzeApp := do
let mut willKnowType := (← read).knowsType
if !(← read).knowsType && !(← canBottomUp (← getExpr)) then
annotateBool `pp.analysis.needsType
withType $ withKnowing true false $ analyze
willKnowType := true
else if ← (pure !(← read).knowsType <||> pure (← read).inBottomUp) <&&> isStructureInstance (← getExpr) then
withType do
annotateBool `pp.structureInstanceTypes
withKnowing true false $ analyze
willKnowType := true
withKnowing willKnowType true $ analyzeAppStaged (← getExpr).getAppFn (← getExpr).getAppArgs
analyzeAppStaged (f : Expr) (args : Array Expr) : AnalyzeM Unit := do
let fType ← replaceLPsWithVars (← inferType f)
let (mvars, bInfos, resultType) ← forallMetaBoundedTelescope fType args.size
let rest := args.extract mvars.size args.size
let args := args.shrink mvars.size
-- Unify with the expected type
if (← read).knowsType then tryUnify (← inferType (mkAppN f args)) resultType
let forceRegularApp : Bool :=
(getPPAnalyzeTrustSubst (← getOptions) && isSubstLike (← getExpr))
|| (getPPAnalyzeTrustSubtypeMk (← getOptions) && (← getExpr).isAppOfArity ``Subtype.mk 4)
analyzeAppStagedCore { f, fType, args, mvars, bInfos, forceRegularApp } |>.run' {
bottomUps := mkArray args.size false,
higherOrders := mkArray args.size false,
provideds := mkArray args.size false,
funBinders := mkArray args.size false
}
if not rest.isEmpty then
-- Note: this shouldn't happen for type-correct terms
if !args.isEmpty then
analyzeAppStaged (mkAppN f args) rest
maybeAddBlockImplicit : AnalyzeM Unit := do
-- See `MonadLift.noConfusion for an example where this is necessary.
if !(← read).parentIsApp then
let type ← inferType (← getExpr)
if type.isForall && type.bindingInfo! == BinderInfo.implicit then
annotateBool `pp.analysis.blockImplicit
analyzeConst : AnalyzeM Unit := do
let Expr.const _ ls .. ← getExpr | unreachable!
if !(← read).knowsLevel && !ls.isEmpty then
-- TODO: this is a very crude heuristic, motivated by https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/590
unless getPPAnalyzeOmitMax (← getOptions) && ls.any containsBadMax do
annotateBool `pp.universes
maybeAddBlockImplicit
analyzePi : AnalyzeM Unit := do
withBindingDomain $ withKnowing true false analyze
withBindingBody Name.anonymous analyze
analyzeLam : AnalyzeM Unit := do
if !(← read).knowsType then annotateBool `pp.funBinderTypes
withBindingDomain $ withKnowing true false analyze
withBindingBody Name.anonymous analyze
analyzeLet : AnalyzeM Unit := do
let Expr.letE _ _ v _ .. ← getExpr | unreachable!
if !(← canBottomUp v) then
annotateBool `pp.analysis.letVarType
withLetVarType $ withKnowing true false analyze
withLetValue $ withKnowing true true analyze
else
withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with inBottomUp := true }) do
withLetValue $ withKnowing true true analyze
withLetBody analyze
analyzeSort : AnalyzeM Unit := pure ()
analyzeProj : AnalyzeM Unit := withProj analyze
analyzeFVar : AnalyzeM Unit := maybeAddBlockImplicit
analyzeMData : AnalyzeM Unit := withMDataExpr analyze
partial def analyzeAppStagedCore : AnalyzeAppM Unit := do
collectBottomUps
checkOutParams
collectHigherOrders
hBinOpHeuristic
collectTrivialBottomUps
discard <| processPostponed (mayPostpone := true)
applyFunBinderHeuristic
analyzeFn
for i in [:(← read).args.size] do analyzeArg i
maybeSetExplicit
where
collectBottomUps := do
let { args, mvars, bInfos, ..} ← read
for target in [fun _ => none, fun i => some mvars[i]!] do
for i in [:args.size] do
if bInfos[i]! == BinderInfo.default then
if ← typeUnknown mvars[i]! <&&> canBottomUp args[i]! (target i) then
tryUnify args[i]! mvars[i]!
modify fun s => { s with bottomUps := s.bottomUps.set! i true }
checkOutParams := do
let { args, mvars, bInfos, ..} ← read
for i in [:args.size] do
if bInfos[i]! == BinderInfo.instImplicit then inspectOutParams args[i]! mvars[i]!
collectHigherOrders := do
let { args, mvars, bInfos, ..} ← read
for i in [:args.size] do
if not (bInfos[i]! == BinderInfo.implicit || bInfos[i]! == BinderInfo.strictImplicit) then continue
if not (← isHigherOrder (← inferType args[i]!)) then continue
if getPPAnalyzeTrustId (← getOptions) && isIdLike args[i]! then continue
if getPPAnalyzeTrustKnownFOType2TypeHOFuns (← getOptions) && not (← valUnknown mvars[i]!)
&& (← isType2Type (args[i]!)) && (← isFOLike (args[i]!)) then continue
tryUnify args[i]! mvars[i]!
modify fun s => { s with higherOrders := s.higherOrders.set! i true }
hBinOpHeuristic := do
let { mvars, ..} ← read
if ← (pure (isHBinOp (← getExpr)) <&&> (valUnknown mvars[0]! <||> valUnknown mvars[1]!)) then
tryUnify mvars[0]! mvars[1]!
collectTrivialBottomUps := do
-- motivation: prevent levels from printing in
-- Boo.mk : {α : Type u_1} → {β : Type u_2} → α → β → Boo.{u_1, u_2} α β
let { args, mvars, bInfos, ..} ← read
for i in [:args.size] do
if bInfos[i]! == BinderInfo.default then
if ← valUnknown mvars[i]! <&&> isTrivialBottomUp args[i]! then
tryUnify args[i]! mvars[i]!
modify fun s => { s with bottomUps := s.bottomUps.set! i true }
applyFunBinderHeuristic := do
let { args, mvars, bInfos, .. } ← read
let rec core (argIdx : Nat) (mvarType : Expr) : AnalyzeAppM Bool := do
match ← getExpr, mvarType with
| Expr.lam .., Expr.forallE _ t b .. =>
let mut annotated := false
for i in [:argIdx] do
if ← pure (bInfos[i]! == BinderInfo.implicit) <&&> valUnknown mvars[i]! <&&> withNewMCtxDepth (checkpointDefEq t mvars[i]!) then
annotateBool `pp.funBinderTypes
tryUnify args[i]! mvars[i]!
-- Note: currently we always analyze the lambda binding domains in `analyzeLam`
-- (so we don't need to analyze it again here)
annotated := true
break
let annotatedBody ← withBindingBody Name.anonymous (core argIdx b)
return annotated || annotatedBody
| _, _ => return false
for i in [:args.size] do
if bInfos[i]! == BinderInfo.default then
let b ← withNaryArg i (core i (← inferType mvars[i]!))
if b then modify fun s => { s with funBinders := s.funBinders.set! i true }
analyzeFn := do
-- Now, if this is the first staging, analyze the n-ary function without expected type
let {f, fType, forceRegularApp ..} ← read
if !f.isApp then withKnowing false (forceRegularApp || !(← hasLevelMVarAtCurrDepth (← instantiateMVars fType))) $ withNaryFn (analyze (parentIsApp := true))
annotateNamedArg (n : Name) : AnalyzeAppM Unit := do
annotateBool `pp.analysis.namedArg
modify fun s => { s with namedArgs := s.namedArgs.push n }
analyzeArg (i : Nat) := do
let { f, args, mvars, bInfos, forceRegularApp ..} ← read
let { bottomUps, higherOrders, funBinders, ..} ← get
let arg := args[i]!
let argType ← inferType arg
let processNaturalImplicit : AnalyzeAppM Unit := do
if (← valUnknown mvars[i]! <||> pure higherOrders[i]!) && !forceRegularApp then
annotateNamedArg (← mvarName mvars[i]!)
modify fun s => { s with provideds := s.provideds.set! i true }
else
annotateBool `pp.analysis.skip
withNaryArg (f.getAppNumArgs + i) do
withTheReader Context (fun ctx => { ctx with inBottomUp := ctx.inBottomUp || bottomUps[i]! }) do
match bInfos[i]! with
| BinderInfo.default =>
if ← pure (getPPAnalyzeExplicitHoles (← getOptions)) <&&> pure !(← valUnknown mvars[i]!) <&&> pure !(← readThe Context).inBottomUp <&&> pure !(← isFunLike arg) <&&> pure !funBinders[i]! <&&> checkpointDefEq mvars[i]! arg then
annotateBool `pp.analysis.hole
else
modify fun s => { s with provideds := s.provideds.set! i true }
| BinderInfo.implicit => processNaturalImplicit
| BinderInfo.strictImplicit => processNaturalImplicit
| BinderInfo.instImplicit =>
-- Note: apparently checking valUnknown here is not sound, because the elaborator
-- will not happily assign instImplicits that it cannot synthesize
let mut provided := true
if !getPPInstances (← getOptions) then
annotateBool `pp.analysis.skip
provided := false
else if getPPAnalyzeCheckInstances (← getOptions) then
let instResult ← try trySynthInstance argType catch _ => pure LOption.undef
match instResult with
| LOption.some inst =>
if ← checkpointDefEq inst arg then annotateBool `pp.analysis.skip; provided := false
else annotateNamedArg (← mvarName mvars[i]!)
| _ => annotateNamedArg (← mvarName mvars[i]!)
else annotateBool `pp.analysis.skip; provided := false
modify fun s => { s with provideds := s.provideds.set! i provided }
| BinderInfo.auxDecl => pure ()
if (← get).provideds[i]! then withKnowing (not (← typeUnknown mvars[i]!)) true analyze
tryUnify mvars[i]! args[i]!
maybeSetExplicit := do
let { f, args, bInfos, ..} ← read
if (← get).namedArgs.any nameNotRoundtrippable then
annotateBool `pp.explicit
for i in [:args.size] do
if !(← get).provideds[i]! then
withNaryArg (f.getAppNumArgs + i) do annotateBool `pp.analysis.hole
if bInfos[i]! == BinderInfo.instImplicit && getPPInstanceTypes (← getOptions) then
withType (withKnowing true false analyze)
end
end TopDownAnalyze
open TopDownAnalyze SubExpr
def topDownAnalyze (e : Expr) : MetaM OptionsPerPos := do
let s₀ ← get
withTraceNode `pp.analyze (fun _ => return e) do
withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with config := Elab.Term.setElabConfig ctx.config }) do
let ϕ : AnalyzeM OptionsPerPos := do withNewMCtxDepth analyze; pure (← get).annotations
try
let knowsType := getPPAnalyzeKnowsType (← getOptions)
ϕ { knowsType := knowsType, knowsLevel := knowsType, subExpr := mkRoot e }
|>.run' { : TopDownAnalyze.State }
catch e =>
trace[pp.analyze.error] "failed {e.toMessageData}"
pure {}
finally set s₀
builtin_initialize
registerTraceClass `pp.analyze
registerTraceClass `pp.analyze.annotate (inherited := true)
registerTraceClass `pp.analyze.tryUnify (inherited := true)
registerTraceClass `pp.analyze.error (inherited := true)
end Lean.PrettyPrinter.Delaborator
|
d54e94942bbf17fb7450a63ee7d56f91733057f9 | 63abd62053d479eae5abf4951554e1064a4c45b4 | /src/order/filter/at_top_bot.lean | 6e491df8caafeaf3b5376025bc206726bc2035be | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Lix0120/mathlib | 0020745240315ed0e517cbf32e738d8f9811dd80 | e14c37827456fc6707f31b4d1d16f1f3a3205e91 | refs/heads/master | 1,673,102,855,024 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 308,930,245 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,604,164,710,000 | 1,604,163,547,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 41,918 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jeremy Avigad, Yury Kudryashov, Patrick Massot
-/
import order.filter.bases
import data.finset.preimage
/-!
# `at_top` and `at_bot` filters on preorded sets, monoids and groups.
In this file we define the filters
* `at_top`: corresponds to `n → +∞`;
* `at_bot`: corresponds to `n → -∞`.
Then we prove many lemmas like “if `f → +∞`, then `f ± c → +∞`”.
-/
variables {ι ι' α β γ : Type*}
open set
open_locale classical filter big_operators
namespace filter
/-- `at_top` is the filter representing the limit `→ ∞` on an ordered set.
It is generated by the collection of up-sets `{b | a ≤ b}`.
(The preorder need not have a top element for this to be well defined,
and indeed is trivial when a top element exists.) -/
def at_top [preorder α] : filter α := ⨅ a, 𝓟 {b | a ≤ b}
/-- `at_bot` is the filter representing the limit `→ -∞` on an ordered set.
It is generated by the collection of down-sets `{b | b ≤ a}`.
(The preorder need not have a bottom element for this to be well defined,
and indeed is trivial when a bottom element exists.) -/
def at_bot [preorder α] : filter α := ⨅ a, 𝓟 {b | b ≤ a}
lemma mem_at_top [preorder α] (a : α) : {b : α | a ≤ b} ∈ @at_top α _ :=
mem_infi_sets a $ subset.refl _
lemma Ioi_mem_at_top [preorder α] [no_top_order α] (x : α) : Ioi x ∈ (at_top : filter α) :=
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := no_top x in mem_sets_of_superset (mem_at_top z) $ λ y h, lt_of_lt_of_le hz h
lemma mem_at_bot [preorder α] (a : α) : {b : α | b ≤ a} ∈ @at_bot α _ :=
mem_infi_sets a $ subset.refl _
lemma Iio_mem_at_bot [preorder α] [no_bot_order α] (x : α) : Iio x ∈ (at_bot : filter α) :=
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := no_bot x in mem_sets_of_superset (mem_at_bot z) $ λ y h, lt_of_le_of_lt h hz
lemma at_top_basis [nonempty α] [semilattice_sup α] :
(@at_top α _).has_basis (λ _, true) Ici :=
has_basis_infi_principal (directed_of_sup $ λ a b, Ici_subset_Ici.2)
lemma at_top_basis' [semilattice_sup α] (a : α) :
(@at_top α _).has_basis (λ x, a ≤ x) Ici :=
⟨λ t, (@at_top_basis α ⟨a⟩ _).mem_iff.trans
⟨λ ⟨x, _, hx⟩, ⟨x ⊔ a, le_sup_right, λ y hy, hx (le_trans le_sup_left hy)⟩,
λ ⟨x, _, hx⟩, ⟨x, trivial, hx⟩⟩⟩
lemma at_bot_basis [nonempty α] [semilattice_inf α] :
(@at_bot α _).has_basis (λ _, true) Iic :=
@at_top_basis (order_dual α) _ _
lemma at_bot_basis' [semilattice_inf α] (a : α) :
(@at_bot α _).has_basis (λ x, x ≤ a) Iic :=
@at_top_basis' (order_dual α) _ _
@[instance]
lemma at_top_ne_bot [nonempty α] [semilattice_sup α] : ne_bot (at_top : filter α) :=
at_top_basis.ne_bot_iff.2 $ λ a _, nonempty_Ici
@[instance]
lemma at_bot_ne_bot [nonempty α] [semilattice_inf α] : ne_bot (at_bot : filter α) :=
@at_top_ne_bot (order_dual α) _ _
@[simp]
lemma mem_at_top_sets [nonempty α] [semilattice_sup α] {s : set α} :
s ∈ (at_top : filter α) ↔ ∃a:α, ∀b≥a, b ∈ s :=
at_top_basis.mem_iff.trans $ exists_congr $ λ _, exists_const _
@[simp]
lemma mem_at_bot_sets [nonempty α] [semilattice_inf α] {s : set α} :
s ∈ (at_bot : filter α) ↔ ∃a:α, ∀b≤a, b ∈ s :=
@mem_at_top_sets (order_dual α) _ _ _
@[simp]
lemma eventually_at_top [semilattice_sup α] [nonempty α] {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in at_top, p x) ↔ (∃ a, ∀ b ≥ a, p b) :=
mem_at_top_sets
@[simp]
lemma eventually_at_bot [semilattice_inf α] [nonempty α] {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in at_bot, p x) ↔ (∃ a, ∀ b ≤ a, p b) :=
mem_at_bot_sets
lemma eventually_ge_at_top [preorder α] (a : α) : ∀ᶠ x in at_top, a ≤ x := mem_at_top a
lemma eventually_le_at_bot [preorder α] (a : α) : ∀ᶠ x in at_bot, x ≤ a := mem_at_bot a
lemma eventually_gt_at_top [preorder α] [no_top_order α] (a : α) :
∀ᶠ x in at_top, a < x :=
Ioi_mem_at_top a
lemma eventually_lt_at_bot [preorder α] [no_bot_order α] (a : α) :
∀ᶠ x in at_bot, x < a :=
Iio_mem_at_bot a
lemma at_top_basis_Ioi [nonempty α] [semilattice_sup α] [no_top_order α] :
(@at_top α _).has_basis (λ _, true) Ioi :=
at_top_basis.to_has_basis (λ a ha, ⟨a, ha, Ioi_subset_Ici_self⟩) $
λ a ha, (no_top a).imp $ λ b hb, ⟨ha, Ici_subset_Ioi.2 hb⟩
lemma at_top_countable_basis [nonempty α] [semilattice_sup α] [encodable α] :
has_countable_basis (at_top : filter α) (λ _, true) Ici :=
{ countable := countable_encodable _,
.. at_top_basis }
lemma at_bot_countable_basis [nonempty α] [semilattice_inf α] [encodable α] :
has_countable_basis (at_bot : filter α) (λ _, true) Iic :=
{ countable := countable_encodable _,
.. at_bot_basis }
lemma is_countably_generated_at_top [nonempty α] [semilattice_sup α] [encodable α] :
(at_top : filter $ α).is_countably_generated :=
at_top_countable_basis.is_countably_generated
lemma is_countably_generated_at_bot [nonempty α] [semilattice_inf α] [encodable α] :
(at_bot : filter $ α).is_countably_generated :=
at_bot_countable_basis.is_countably_generated
lemma order_top.at_top_eq (α) [order_top α] : (at_top : filter α) = pure ⊤ :=
le_antisymm (le_pure_iff.2 $ (eventually_ge_at_top ⊤).mono $ λ b, top_unique)
(le_infi $ λ b, le_principal_iff.2 le_top)
lemma order_bot.at_bot_eq (α) [order_bot α] : (at_bot : filter α) = pure ⊥ :=
@order_top.at_top_eq (order_dual α) _
lemma tendsto_at_top_pure [order_top α] (f : α → β) :
tendsto f at_top (pure $ f ⊤) :=
(order_top.at_top_eq α).symm ▸ tendsto_pure_pure _ _
lemma tendsto_at_bot_pure [order_bot α] (f : α → β) :
tendsto f at_bot (pure $ f ⊥) :=
@tendsto_at_top_pure (order_dual α) _ _ _
lemma eventually.exists_forall_of_at_top [semilattice_sup α] [nonempty α] {p : α → Prop}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in at_top, p x) : ∃ a, ∀ b ≥ a, p b :=
eventually_at_top.mp h
lemma eventually.exists_forall_of_at_bot [semilattice_inf α] [nonempty α] {p : α → Prop}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in at_bot, p x) : ∃ a, ∀ b ≤ a, p b :=
eventually_at_bot.mp h
lemma frequently_at_top [semilattice_sup α] [nonempty α] {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in at_top, p x) ↔ (∀ a, ∃ b ≥ a, p b) :=
by simp [at_top_basis.frequently_iff]
lemma frequently_at_bot [semilattice_inf α] [nonempty α] {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in at_bot, p x) ↔ (∀ a, ∃ b ≤ a, p b) :=
@frequently_at_top (order_dual α) _ _ _
lemma frequently_at_top' [semilattice_sup α] [nonempty α] [no_top_order α] {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in at_top, p x) ↔ (∀ a, ∃ b > a, p b) :=
by simp [at_top_basis_Ioi.frequently_iff]
lemma frequently_at_bot' [semilattice_inf α] [nonempty α] [no_bot_order α] {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in at_bot, p x) ↔ (∀ a, ∃ b < a, p b) :=
@frequently_at_top' (order_dual α) _ _ _ _
lemma frequently.forall_exists_of_at_top [semilattice_sup α] [nonempty α] {p : α → Prop}
(h : ∃ᶠ x in at_top, p x) : ∀ a, ∃ b ≥ a, p b :=
frequently_at_top.mp h
lemma frequently.forall_exists_of_at_bot [semilattice_inf α] [nonempty α] {p : α → Prop}
(h : ∃ᶠ x in at_bot, p x) : ∀ a, ∃ b ≤ a, p b :=
frequently_at_bot.mp h
lemma map_at_top_eq [nonempty α] [semilattice_sup α] {f : α → β} :
at_top.map f = (⨅a, 𝓟 $ f '' {a' | a ≤ a'}) :=
(at_top_basis.map _).eq_infi
lemma map_at_bot_eq [nonempty α] [semilattice_inf α] {f : α → β} :
at_bot.map f = (⨅a, 𝓟 $ f '' {a' | a' ≤ a}) :=
@map_at_top_eq (order_dual α) _ _ _ _
lemma tendsto_at_top [preorder β] {m : α → β} {f : filter α} :
tendsto m f at_top ↔ (∀b, ∀ᶠ a in f, b ≤ m a) :=
by simp only [at_top, tendsto_infi, tendsto_principal, mem_set_of_eq]
lemma tendsto_at_bot [preorder β] {m : α → β} {f : filter α} :
tendsto m f at_bot ↔ (∀b, ∀ᶠ a in f, m a ≤ b) :=
@tendsto_at_top α (order_dual β) _ m f
lemma tendsto_at_top_mono' [preorder β] (l : filter α) ⦃f₁ f₂ : α → β⦄ (h : f₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂) :
tendsto f₁ l at_top → tendsto f₂ l at_top :=
assume h₁, tendsto_at_top.2 $ λ b, mp_sets (tendsto_at_top.1 h₁ b)
(monotone_mem_sets (λ a ha ha₁, le_trans ha₁ ha) h)
lemma tendsto_at_bot_mono' [preorder β] (l : filter α) ⦃f₁ f₂ : α → β⦄ (h : f₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂) :
tendsto f₂ l at_bot → tendsto f₁ l at_bot :=
@tendsto_at_top_mono' _ (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ h
lemma tendsto_at_top_mono [preorder β] {l : filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : ∀ n, f n ≤ g n) :
tendsto f l at_top → tendsto g l at_top :=
tendsto_at_top_mono' l $ eventually_of_forall h
lemma tendsto_at_bot_mono [preorder β] {l : filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : ∀ n, f n ≤ g n) :
tendsto g l at_bot → tendsto f l at_bot :=
@tendsto_at_top_mono _ (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ h
/-!
### Sequences
-/
lemma inf_map_at_top_ne_bot_iff [semilattice_sup α] [nonempty α] {F : filter β} {u : α → β} :
ne_bot (F ⊓ (map u at_top)) ↔ ∀ U ∈ F, ∀ N, ∃ n ≥ N, u n ∈ U :=
by simp_rw [inf_ne_bot_iff_frequently_left, frequently_map, frequently_at_top]; refl
lemma inf_map_at_bot_ne_bot_iff [semilattice_inf α] [nonempty α] {F : filter β} {u : α → β} :
ne_bot (F ⊓ (map u at_bot)) ↔ ∀ U ∈ F, ∀ N, ∃ n ≤ N, u n ∈ U :=
@inf_map_at_top_ne_bot_iff (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _
lemma extraction_of_frequently_at_top' {P : ℕ → Prop} (h : ∀ N, ∃ n > N, P n) :
∃ φ : ℕ → ℕ, strict_mono φ ∧ ∀ n, P (φ n) :=
begin
choose u hu using h,
cases forall_and_distrib.mp hu with hu hu',
exact ⟨u ∘ (nat.rec 0 (λ n v, u v)), strict_mono.nat (λ n, hu _), λ n, hu' _⟩,
end
lemma extraction_of_frequently_at_top {P : ℕ → Prop} (h : ∃ᶠ n in at_top, P n) :
∃ φ : ℕ → ℕ, strict_mono φ ∧ ∀ n, P (φ n) :=
begin
rw frequently_at_top' at h,
exact extraction_of_frequently_at_top' h,
end
lemma extraction_of_eventually_at_top {P : ℕ → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ n in at_top, P n) :
∃ φ : ℕ → ℕ, strict_mono φ ∧ ∀ n, P (φ n) :=
extraction_of_frequently_at_top h.frequently
lemma exists_le_of_tendsto_at_top [semilattice_sup α] [preorder β] {u : α → β}
(h : tendsto u at_top at_top) (a : α) (b : β) : ∃ a' ≥ a, b ≤ u a' :=
begin
have : ∀ᶠ x in at_top, a ≤ x ∧ b ≤ u x :=
(eventually_ge_at_top a).and (h.eventually $ eventually_ge_at_top b),
haveI : nonempty α := ⟨a⟩,
rcases this.exists with ⟨a', ha, hb⟩,
exact ⟨a', ha, hb⟩
end
@[nolint ge_or_gt] -- see Note [nolint_ge]
lemma exists_le_of_tendsto_at_bot [semilattice_sup α] [preorder β] {u : α → β}
(h : tendsto u at_top at_bot) : ∀ a b, ∃ a' ≥ a, u a' ≤ b :=
@exists_le_of_tendsto_at_top _ (order_dual β) _ _ _ h
lemma exists_lt_of_tendsto_at_top [semilattice_sup α] [preorder β] [no_top_order β]
{u : α → β} (h : tendsto u at_top at_top) (a : α) (b : β) : ∃ a' ≥ a, b < u a' :=
begin
cases no_top b with b' hb',
rcases exists_le_of_tendsto_at_top h a b' with ⟨a', ha', ha''⟩,
exact ⟨a', ha', lt_of_lt_of_le hb' ha''⟩
end
@[nolint ge_or_gt] -- see Note [nolint_ge]
lemma exists_lt_of_tendsto_at_bot [semilattice_sup α] [preorder β] [no_bot_order β]
{u : α → β} (h : tendsto u at_top at_bot) : ∀ a b, ∃ a' ≥ a, u a' < b :=
@exists_lt_of_tendsto_at_top _ (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ h
/--
If `u` is a sequence which is unbounded above,
then after any point, it reaches a value strictly greater than all previous values.
-/
lemma high_scores [linear_order β] [no_top_order β] {u : ℕ → β}
(hu : tendsto u at_top at_top) : ∀ N, ∃ n ≥ N, ∀ k < n, u k < u n :=
begin
intros N,
let A := finset.image u (finset.range $ N+1), -- A = {u 0, ..., u N}
have Ane : A.nonempty,
from ⟨u 0, finset.mem_image_of_mem _ (finset.mem_range.mpr $ nat.zero_lt_succ _)⟩,
let M := finset.max' A Ane,
have ex : ∃ n ≥ N, M < u n,
from exists_lt_of_tendsto_at_top hu _ _,
obtain ⟨n, hnN, hnM, hn_min⟩ : ∃ n, N ≤ n ∧ M < u n ∧ ∀ k, N ≤ k → k < n → u k ≤ M,
{ use nat.find ex,
rw ← and_assoc,
split,
{ simpa using nat.find_spec ex },
{ intros k hk hk',
simpa [hk] using nat.find_min ex hk' } },
use [n, hnN],
intros k hk,
by_cases H : k ≤ N,
{ have : u k ∈ A,
from finset.mem_image_of_mem _ (finset.mem_range.mpr $ nat.lt_succ_of_le H),
have : u k ≤ M,
from finset.le_max' A (u k) this,
exact lt_of_le_of_lt this hnM },
{ push_neg at H,
calc u k ≤ M : hn_min k (le_of_lt H) hk
... < u n : hnM },
end
/--
If `u` is a sequence which is unbounded below,
then after any point, it reaches a value strictly smaller than all previous values.
-/
@[nolint ge_or_gt] -- see Note [nolint_ge]
lemma low_scores [linear_order β] [no_bot_order β] {u : ℕ → β}
(hu : tendsto u at_top at_bot) : ∀ N, ∃ n ≥ N, ∀ k < n, u n < u k :=
@high_scores (order_dual β) _ _ _ hu
/--
If `u` is a sequence which is unbounded above,
then it `frequently` reaches a value strictly greater than all previous values.
-/
lemma frequently_high_scores [linear_order β] [no_top_order β] {u : ℕ → β}
(hu : tendsto u at_top at_top) : ∃ᶠ n in at_top, ∀ k < n, u k < u n :=
by simpa [frequently_at_top] using high_scores hu
/--
If `u` is a sequence which is unbounded below,
then it `frequently` reaches a value strictly smaller than all previous values.
-/
lemma frequently_low_scores [linear_order β] [no_bot_order β] {u : ℕ → β}
(hu : tendsto u at_top at_bot) : ∃ᶠ n in at_top, ∀ k < n, u n < u k :=
@frequently_high_scores (order_dual β) _ _ _ hu
lemma strict_mono_subseq_of_tendsto_at_top
{β : Type*} [linear_order β] [no_top_order β]
{u : ℕ → β} (hu : tendsto u at_top at_top) :
∃ φ : ℕ → ℕ, strict_mono φ ∧ strict_mono (u ∘ φ) :=
let ⟨φ, h, h'⟩ := extraction_of_frequently_at_top (frequently_high_scores hu) in
⟨φ, h, λ n m hnm, h' m _ (h hnm)⟩
lemma strict_mono_subseq_of_id_le {u : ℕ → ℕ} (hu : ∀ n, n ≤ u n) :
∃ φ : ℕ → ℕ, strict_mono φ ∧ strict_mono (u ∘ φ) :=
strict_mono_subseq_of_tendsto_at_top (tendsto_at_top_mono hu tendsto_id)
lemma strict_mono_tendsto_at_top {φ : ℕ → ℕ} (h : strict_mono φ) :
tendsto φ at_top at_top :=
tendsto_at_top_mono h.id_le tendsto_id
section ordered_add_comm_monoid
variables [ordered_add_comm_monoid β] {l : filter α} {f g : α → β}
lemma tendsto_at_top_add_nonneg_left' (hf : ∀ᶠ x in l, 0 ≤ f x) (hg : tendsto g l at_top) :
tendsto (λ x, f x + g x) l at_top :=
tendsto_at_top_mono' l (hf.mono (λ x, le_add_of_nonneg_left)) hg
lemma tendsto_at_bot_add_nonpos_left' (hf : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≤ 0) (hg : tendsto g l at_bot) :
tendsto (λ x, f x + g x) l at_bot :=
@tendsto_at_top_add_nonneg_left' _ (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ hf hg
lemma tendsto_at_top_add_nonneg_left (hf : ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x) (hg : tendsto g l at_top) :
tendsto (λ x, f x + g x) l at_top :=
tendsto_at_top_add_nonneg_left' (eventually_of_forall hf) hg
lemma tendsto_at_bot_add_nonpos_left (hf : ∀ x, f x ≤ 0) (hg : tendsto g l at_bot) :
tendsto (λ x, f x + g x) l at_bot :=
@tendsto_at_top_add_nonneg_left _ (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ hf hg
lemma tendsto_at_top_add_nonneg_right' (hf : tendsto f l at_top) (hg : ∀ᶠ x in l, 0 ≤ g x) :
tendsto (λ x, f x + g x) l at_top :=
tendsto_at_top_mono' l (monotone_mem_sets (λ x, le_add_of_nonneg_right) hg) hf
lemma tendsto_at_bot_add_nonpos_right' (hf : tendsto f l at_bot) (hg : ∀ᶠ x in l, g x ≤ 0) :
tendsto (λ x, f x + g x) l at_bot :=
@tendsto_at_top_add_nonneg_right' _ (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ hf hg
lemma tendsto_at_top_add_nonneg_right (hf : tendsto f l at_top) (hg : ∀ x, 0 ≤ g x) :
tendsto (λ x, f x + g x) l at_top :=
tendsto_at_top_add_nonneg_right' hf (eventually_of_forall hg)
lemma tendsto_at_bot_add_nonpos_right (hf : tendsto f l at_bot) (hg : ∀ x, g x ≤ 0) :
tendsto (λ x, f x + g x) l at_bot :=
@tendsto_at_top_add_nonneg_right _ (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ hf hg
lemma tendsto_at_top_add (hf : tendsto f l at_top) (hg : tendsto g l at_top) :
tendsto (λ x, f x + g x) l at_top :=
tendsto_at_top_add_nonneg_left' (tendsto_at_top.mp hf 0) hg
lemma tendsto_at_bot_add (hf : tendsto f l at_bot) (hg : tendsto g l at_bot) :
tendsto (λ x, f x + g x) l at_bot :=
@tendsto_at_top_add _ (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ hf hg
end ordered_add_comm_monoid
section ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid
variables [ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid β] {l : filter α} {f g : α → β}
lemma tendsto_at_top_of_add_const_left (C : β) (hf : tendsto (λ x, C + f x) l at_top) :
tendsto f l at_top :=
tendsto_at_top.2 $ assume b, (tendsto_at_top.1 hf (C + b)).mono (λ x, le_of_add_le_add_left)
lemma tendsto_at_bot_of_add_const_left (C : β) (hf : tendsto (λ x, C + f x) l at_bot) :
tendsto f l at_bot :=
@tendsto_at_top_of_add_const_left _ (order_dual β) _ _ _ C hf
lemma tendsto_at_top_of_add_const_right (C : β) (hf : tendsto (λ x, f x + C) l at_top) :
tendsto f l at_top :=
tendsto_at_top.2 $ assume b, (tendsto_at_top.1 hf (b + C)).mono (λ x, le_of_add_le_add_right)
lemma tendsto_at_bot_of_add_const_right (C : β) (hf : tendsto (λ x, f x + C) l at_bot) :
tendsto f l at_bot :=
@tendsto_at_top_of_add_const_right _ (order_dual β) _ _ _ C hf
lemma tendsto_at_top_of_add_bdd_above_left' (C) (hC : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≤ C)
(h : tendsto (λ x, f x + g x) l at_top) :
tendsto g l at_top :=
tendsto_at_top_of_add_const_left C
(tendsto_at_top_mono' l (hC.mono (λ x hx, add_le_add_right hx (g x))) h)
lemma tendsto_at_bot_of_add_bdd_below_left' (C) (hC : ∀ᶠ x in l, C ≤ f x)
(h : tendsto (λ x, f x + g x) l at_bot) :
tendsto g l at_bot :=
@tendsto_at_top_of_add_bdd_above_left' _ (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ C hC h
lemma tendsto_at_top_of_add_bdd_above_left (C) (hC : ∀ x, f x ≤ C) :
tendsto (λ x, f x + g x) l at_top → tendsto g l at_top :=
tendsto_at_top_of_add_bdd_above_left' C (univ_mem_sets' hC)
lemma tendsto_at_bot_of_add_bdd_below_left (C) (hC : ∀ x, C ≤ f x) :
tendsto (λ x, f x + g x) l at_bot → tendsto g l at_bot :=
@tendsto_at_top_of_add_bdd_above_left _ (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ C hC
lemma tendsto_at_top_of_add_bdd_above_right' (C) (hC : ∀ᶠ x in l, g x ≤ C)
(h : tendsto (λ x, f x + g x) l at_top) :
tendsto f l at_top :=
tendsto_at_top_of_add_const_right C
(tendsto_at_top_mono' l (hC.mono (λ x hx, add_le_add_left hx (f x))) h)
lemma tendsto_at_bot_of_add_bdd_below_right' (C) (hC : ∀ᶠ x in l, C ≤ g x)
(h : tendsto (λ x, f x + g x) l at_bot) :
tendsto f l at_bot :=
@tendsto_at_top_of_add_bdd_above_right' _ (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ C hC h
lemma tendsto_at_top_of_add_bdd_above_right (C) (hC : ∀ x, g x ≤ C) :
tendsto (λ x, f x + g x) l at_top → tendsto f l at_top :=
tendsto_at_top_of_add_bdd_above_right' C (univ_mem_sets' hC)
lemma tendsto_at_bot_of_add_bdd_below_right (C) (hC : ∀ x, C ≤ g x) :
tendsto (λ x, f x + g x) l at_bot → tendsto f l at_bot :=
@tendsto_at_top_of_add_bdd_above_right _ (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ C hC
end ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid
section ordered_group
variables [ordered_add_comm_group β] (l : filter α) {f g : α → β}
lemma tendsto_at_top_add_left_of_le' (C : β) (hf : ∀ᶠ x in l, C ≤ f x) (hg : tendsto g l at_top) :
tendsto (λ x, f x + g x) l at_top :=
@tendsto_at_top_of_add_bdd_above_left' _ _ _ l (λ x, -(f x)) (λ x, f x + g x) (-C)
(by simpa) (by simpa)
lemma tendsto_at_bot_add_left_of_ge' (C : β) (hf : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≤ C) (hg : tendsto g l at_bot) :
tendsto (λ x, f x + g x) l at_bot :=
@tendsto_at_top_add_left_of_le' _ (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ C hf hg
lemma tendsto_at_top_add_left_of_le (C : β) (hf : ∀ x, C ≤ f x) (hg : tendsto g l at_top) :
tendsto (λ x, f x + g x) l at_top :=
tendsto_at_top_add_left_of_le' l C (univ_mem_sets' hf) hg
lemma tendsto_at_bot_add_left_of_ge (C : β) (hf : ∀ x, f x ≤ C) (hg : tendsto g l at_bot) :
tendsto (λ x, f x + g x) l at_bot :=
@tendsto_at_top_add_left_of_le _ (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ C hf hg
lemma tendsto_at_top_add_right_of_le' (C : β) (hf : tendsto f l at_top) (hg : ∀ᶠ x in l, C ≤ g x) :
tendsto (λ x, f x + g x) l at_top :=
@tendsto_at_top_of_add_bdd_above_right' _ _ _ l (λ x, f x + g x) (λ x, -(g x)) (-C)
(by simp [hg]) (by simp [hf])
lemma tendsto_at_bot_add_right_of_ge' (C : β) (hf : tendsto f l at_bot) (hg : ∀ᶠ x in l, g x ≤ C) :
tendsto (λ x, f x + g x) l at_bot :=
@tendsto_at_top_add_right_of_le' _ (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ C hf hg
lemma tendsto_at_top_add_right_of_le (C : β) (hf : tendsto f l at_top) (hg : ∀ x, C ≤ g x) :
tendsto (λ x, f x + g x) l at_top :=
tendsto_at_top_add_right_of_le' l C hf (univ_mem_sets' hg)
lemma tendsto_at_bot_add_right_of_ge (C : β) (hf : tendsto f l at_bot) (hg : ∀ x, g x ≤ C) :
tendsto (λ x, f x + g x) l at_bot :=
@tendsto_at_top_add_right_of_le _ (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ C hf hg
lemma tendsto_at_top_add_const_left (C : β) (hf : tendsto f l at_top) :
tendsto (λ x, C + f x) l at_top :=
tendsto_at_top_add_left_of_le' l C (univ_mem_sets' $ λ _, le_refl C) hf
lemma tendsto_at_bot_add_const_left (C : β) (hf : tendsto f l at_bot) :
tendsto (λ x, C + f x) l at_bot :=
@tendsto_at_top_add_const_left _ (order_dual β) _ _ _ C hf
lemma tendsto_at_top_add_const_right (C : β) (hf : tendsto f l at_top) :
tendsto (λ x, f x + C) l at_top :=
tendsto_at_top_add_right_of_le' l C hf (univ_mem_sets' $ λ _, le_refl C)
lemma tendsto_at_bot_add_const_right (C : β) (hf : tendsto f l at_bot) :
tendsto (λ x, f x + C) l at_bot :=
@tendsto_at_top_add_const_right _ (order_dual β) _ _ _ C hf
end ordered_group
section linear_ordered_semiring
variables [ordered_semiring α] {l : filter β} {f g : β → α}
lemma tendsto_at_top_mul_at_top (hf : tendsto f l at_top) (hg : tendsto g l at_top) :
tendsto (λ x, f x * g x) l at_top :=
begin
refine tendsto_at_top_mono' _ _ hg,
filter_upwards [hg (eventually_ge_at_top 0), hf (eventually_ge_at_top 1)],
exact λ x, le_mul_of_one_le_left
end
end linear_ordered_semiring
open_locale filter
lemma tendsto_at_top' [nonempty α] [semilattice_sup α] {f : α → β} {l : filter β} :
tendsto f at_top l ↔ (∀s ∈ l, ∃a, ∀b≥a, f b ∈ s) :=
by simp only [tendsto_def, mem_at_top_sets]; refl
lemma tendsto_at_bot' [nonempty α] [semilattice_inf α] {f : α → β} {l : filter β} :
tendsto f at_bot l ↔ (∀s ∈ l, ∃a, ∀b≤a, f b ∈ s) :=
@tendsto_at_top' (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _
theorem tendsto_at_top_principal [nonempty β] [semilattice_sup β] {f : β → α} {s : set α} :
tendsto f at_top (𝓟 s) ↔ ∃N, ∀n≥N, f n ∈ s :=
by rw [tendsto_iff_comap, comap_principal, le_principal_iff, mem_at_top_sets]; refl
theorem tendsto_at_bot_principal [nonempty β] [semilattice_inf β] {f : β → α} {s : set α} :
tendsto f at_bot (𝓟 s) ↔ ∃N, ∀n≤N, f n ∈ s :=
@tendsto_at_top_principal _ (order_dual β) _ _ _ _
/-- A function `f` grows to `+∞` independent of an order-preserving embedding `e`. -/
lemma tendsto_at_top_at_top [nonempty α] [semilattice_sup α] [preorder β] {f : α → β} :
tendsto f at_top at_top ↔ ∀ b : β, ∃ i : α, ∀ a : α, i ≤ a → b ≤ f a :=
iff.trans tendsto_infi $ forall_congr $ assume b, tendsto_at_top_principal
lemma tendsto_at_top_at_bot [nonempty α] [semilattice_sup α] [preorder β] {f : α → β} :
tendsto f at_top at_bot ↔ ∀ (b : β), ∃ (i : α), ∀ (a : α), i ≤ a → f a ≤ b :=
@tendsto_at_top_at_top α (order_dual β) _ _ _ f
lemma tendsto_at_bot_at_top [nonempty α] [semilattice_inf α] [preorder β] {f : α → β} :
tendsto f at_bot at_top ↔ ∀ (b : β), ∃ (i : α), ∀ (a : α), a ≤ i → b ≤ f a :=
@tendsto_at_top_at_top (order_dual α) β _ _ _ f
lemma tendsto_at_bot_at_bot [nonempty α] [semilattice_inf α] [preorder β] {f : α → β} :
tendsto f at_bot at_bot ↔ ∀ (b : β), ∃ (i : α), ∀ (a : α), a ≤ i → f a ≤ b :=
@tendsto_at_top_at_top (order_dual α) (order_dual β) _ _ _ f
lemma tendsto_at_top_at_top_of_monotone [preorder α] [preorder β] {f : α → β} (hf : monotone f)
(h : ∀ b, ∃ a, b ≤ f a) :
tendsto f at_top at_top :=
tendsto_infi.2 $ λ b, tendsto_principal.2 $ let ⟨a, ha⟩ := h b in
mem_sets_of_superset (mem_at_top a) $ λ a' ha', le_trans ha (hf ha')
lemma tendsto_at_bot_at_bot_of_monotone [preorder α] [preorder β] {f : α → β} (hf : monotone f)
(h : ∀ b, ∃ a, f a ≤ b) :
tendsto f at_bot at_bot :=
tendsto_infi.2 $ λ b, tendsto_principal.2 $ let ⟨a, ha⟩ := h b in
mem_sets_of_superset (mem_at_bot a) $ λ a' ha', le_trans (hf ha') ha
lemma tendsto_at_top_at_top_iff_of_monotone [nonempty α] [semilattice_sup α] [preorder β]
{f : α → β} (hf : monotone f) :
tendsto f at_top at_top ↔ ∀ b : β, ∃ a : α, b ≤ f a :=
tendsto_at_top_at_top.trans $ forall_congr $ λ b, exists_congr $ λ a,
⟨λ h, h a (le_refl a), λ h a' ha', le_trans h $ hf ha'⟩
lemma tendsto_at_bot_at_bot_iff_of_monotone [nonempty α] [semilattice_inf α] [preorder β]
{f : α → β} (hf : monotone f) :
tendsto f at_bot at_bot ↔ ∀ b : β, ∃ a : α, f a ≤ b :=
tendsto_at_bot_at_bot.trans $ forall_congr $ λ b, exists_congr $ λ a,
⟨λ h, h a (le_refl a), λ h a' ha', le_trans (hf ha') h⟩
alias tendsto_at_top_at_top_of_monotone ← monotone.tendsto_at_top_at_top
alias tendsto_at_bot_at_bot_of_monotone ← monotone.tendsto_at_bot_at_bot
alias tendsto_at_top_at_top_iff_of_monotone ← monotone.tendsto_at_top_at_top_iff
alias tendsto_at_bot_at_bot_iff_of_monotone ← monotone.tendsto_at_bot_at_bot_iff
lemma tendsto_at_top_embedding [preorder β] [preorder γ]
{f : α → β} {e : β → γ} {l : filter α}
(hm : ∀b₁ b₂, e b₁ ≤ e b₂ ↔ b₁ ≤ b₂) (hu : ∀c, ∃b, c ≤ e b) :
tendsto (e ∘ f) l at_top ↔ tendsto f l at_top :=
begin
refine ⟨_, (tendsto_at_top_at_top_of_monotone (λ b₁ b₂, (hm b₁ b₂).2) hu).comp⟩,
rw [tendsto_at_top, tendsto_at_top],
exact λ hc b, (hc (e b)).mono (λ a, (hm b (f a)).1)
end
/-- A function `f` goes to `-∞` independent of an order-preserving embedding `e`. -/
lemma tendsto_at_bot_embedding [preorder β] [preorder γ]
{f : α → β} {e : β → γ} {l : filter α}
(hm : ∀b₁ b₂, e b₁ ≤ e b₂ ↔ b₁ ≤ b₂) (hu : ∀c, ∃b, e b ≤ c) :
tendsto (e ∘ f) l at_bot ↔ tendsto f l at_bot :=
@tendsto_at_top_embedding α (order_dual β) (order_dual γ) _ _ f e l (function.swap hm) hu
lemma tendsto_finset_range : tendsto finset.range at_top at_top :=
finset.range_mono.tendsto_at_top_at_top finset.exists_nat_subset_range
lemma at_top_finset_eq_infi : (at_top : filter $ finset α) = ⨅ x : α, 𝓟 (Ici {x}) :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (le_infi (λ i, le_principal_iff.2 $ mem_at_top {i})) _,
refine le_infi (λ s, le_principal_iff.2 $ mem_infi_iff.2 _),
refine ⟨↑s, s.finite_to_set, _, λ i, mem_principal_self _, _⟩,
simp only [subset_def, mem_Inter, set_coe.forall, mem_Ici, finset.le_iff_subset,
finset.mem_singleton, finset.subset_iff, forall_eq], dsimp,
exact λ t, id
end
/-- If `f` is a monotone sequence of `finset`s and each `x` belongs to one of `f n`, then
`tendsto f at_top at_top`. -/
lemma tendsto_at_top_finset_of_monotone [preorder β]
{f : β → finset α} (h : monotone f) (h' : ∀ x : α, ∃ n, x ∈ f n) :
tendsto f at_top at_top :=
begin
simp only [at_top_finset_eq_infi, tendsto_infi, tendsto_principal],
intro a,
rcases h' a with ⟨b, hb⟩,
exact eventually.mono (mem_at_top b)
(λ b' hb', le_trans (finset.singleton_subset_iff.2 hb) (h hb')),
end
alias tendsto_at_top_finset_of_monotone ← monotone.tendsto_at_top_finset
lemma tendsto_finset_image_at_top_at_top {i : β → γ} {j : γ → β} (h : function.left_inverse j i) :
tendsto (finset.image j) at_top at_top :=
(finset.image_mono j).tendsto_at_top_finset $ assume a,
⟨{i a}, by simp only [finset.image_singleton, h a, finset.mem_singleton]⟩
lemma tendsto_finset_preimage_at_top_at_top {f : α → β} (hf : function.injective f) :
tendsto (λ s : finset β, s.preimage f (hf.inj_on _)) at_top at_top :=
(finset.monotone_preimage hf).tendsto_at_top_finset $
λ x, ⟨{f x}, finset.mem_preimage.2 $ finset.mem_singleton_self _⟩
lemma prod_at_top_at_top_eq {β₁ β₂ : Type*} [semilattice_sup β₁] [semilattice_sup β₂] :
(at_top : filter β₁) ×ᶠ (at_top : filter β₂) = (at_top : filter (β₁ × β₂)) :=
begin
by_cases ne : nonempty β₁ ∧ nonempty β₂,
{ cases ne,
resetI,
simp [at_top, prod_infi_left, prod_infi_right, infi_prod],
exact infi_comm },
{ rw not_and_distrib at ne,
cases ne;
{ have : ¬ (nonempty (β₁ × β₂)), by simp [ne],
rw [at_top.filter_eq_bot_of_not_nonempty ne, at_top.filter_eq_bot_of_not_nonempty this],
simp only [bot_prod, prod_bot] } }
end
lemma prod_at_bot_at_bot_eq {β₁ β₂ : Type*} [semilattice_inf β₁] [semilattice_inf β₂] :
(at_bot : filter β₁) ×ᶠ (at_bot : filter β₂) = (at_bot : filter (β₁ × β₂)) :=
@prod_at_top_at_top_eq (order_dual β₁) (order_dual β₂) _ _
lemma prod_map_at_top_eq {α₁ α₂ β₁ β₂ : Type*} [semilattice_sup β₁] [semilattice_sup β₂]
(u₁ : β₁ → α₁) (u₂ : β₂ → α₂) :
(map u₁ at_top) ×ᶠ (map u₂ at_top) = map (prod.map u₁ u₂) at_top :=
by rw [prod_map_map_eq, prod_at_top_at_top_eq, prod.map_def]
lemma prod_map_at_bot_eq {α₁ α₂ β₁ β₂ : Type*} [semilattice_inf β₁] [semilattice_inf β₂]
(u₁ : β₁ → α₁) (u₂ : β₂ → α₂) :
(map u₁ at_bot) ×ᶠ (map u₂ at_bot) = map (prod.map u₁ u₂) at_bot :=
@prod_map_at_top_eq _ _ (order_dual β₁) (order_dual β₂) _ _ _ _
/-- A function `f` maps upwards closed sets (at_top sets) to upwards closed sets when it is a
Galois insertion. The Galois "insertion" and "connection" is weakened to only require it to be an
insertion and a connetion above `b'`. -/
lemma map_at_top_eq_of_gc [semilattice_sup α] [semilattice_sup β] {f : α → β} (g : β → α) (b' : β)
(hf : monotone f) (gc : ∀a, ∀b≥b', f a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ g b) (hgi : ∀b≥b', b ≤ f (g b)) :
map f at_top = at_top :=
begin
refine le_antisymm
(hf.tendsto_at_top_at_top $ λ b, ⟨g (b ⊔ b'), le_sup_left.trans $ hgi _ le_sup_right⟩) _,
rw [@map_at_top_eq _ _ ⟨g b'⟩],
refine le_infi (λ a, infi_le_of_le (f a ⊔ b') $ principal_mono.2 $ λ b hb, _),
rw [mem_set_of_eq, sup_le_iff] at hb,
exact ⟨g b, (gc _ _ hb.2).1 hb.1, le_antisymm ((gc _ _ hb.2).2 (le_refl _)) (hgi _ hb.2)⟩
end
lemma map_at_bot_eq_of_gc [semilattice_inf α] [semilattice_inf β] {f : α → β} (g : β → α) (b' : β)
(hf : monotone f) (gc : ∀a, ∀b≤b', b ≤ f a ↔ g b ≤ a) (hgi : ∀b≤b', f (g b) ≤ b) :
map f at_bot = at_bot :=
@map_at_top_eq_of_gc (order_dual α) (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ _ hf.order_dual gc hgi
lemma map_add_at_top_eq_nat (k : ℕ) : map (λa, a + k) at_top = at_top :=
map_at_top_eq_of_gc (λa, a - k) k
(assume a b h, add_le_add_right h k)
(assume a b h, (nat.le_sub_right_iff_add_le h).symm)
(assume a h, by rw [nat.sub_add_cancel h])
lemma map_sub_at_top_eq_nat (k : ℕ) : map (λa, a - k) at_top = at_top :=
map_at_top_eq_of_gc (λa, a + k) 0
(assume a b h, nat.sub_le_sub_right h _)
(assume a b _, nat.sub_le_right_iff_le_add)
(assume b _, by rw [nat.add_sub_cancel])
lemma tendsto_add_at_top_nat (k : ℕ) : tendsto (λa, a + k) at_top at_top :=
le_of_eq (map_add_at_top_eq_nat k)
lemma tendsto_sub_at_top_nat (k : ℕ) : tendsto (λa, a - k) at_top at_top :=
le_of_eq (map_sub_at_top_eq_nat k)
lemma tendsto_add_at_top_iff_nat {f : ℕ → α} {l : filter α} (k : ℕ) :
tendsto (λn, f (n + k)) at_top l ↔ tendsto f at_top l :=
show tendsto (f ∘ (λn, n + k)) at_top l ↔ tendsto f at_top l,
by rw [← tendsto_map'_iff, map_add_at_top_eq_nat]
lemma map_div_at_top_eq_nat (k : ℕ) (hk : 0 < k) : map (λa, a / k) at_top = at_top :=
map_at_top_eq_of_gc (λb, b * k + (k - 1)) 1
(assume a b h, nat.div_le_div_right h)
(assume a b _,
calc a / k ≤ b ↔ a / k < b + 1 : by rw [← nat.succ_eq_add_one, nat.lt_succ_iff]
... ↔ a < (b + 1) * k : nat.div_lt_iff_lt_mul _ _ hk
... ↔ _ :
begin
cases k,
exact (lt_irrefl _ hk).elim,
simp [mul_add, add_mul, nat.succ_add, nat.lt_succ_iff]
end)
(assume b _,
calc b = (b * k) / k : by rw [nat.mul_div_cancel b hk]
... ≤ (b * k + (k - 1)) / k : nat.div_le_div_right $ nat.le_add_right _ _)
/-- If `u` is a monotone function with linear ordered codomain and the range of `u` is not bounded
above, then `tendsto u at_top at_top`. -/
lemma tendsto_at_top_at_top_of_monotone' [preorder ι] [linear_order α]
{u : ι → α} (h : monotone u) (H : ¬bdd_above (range u)) :
tendsto u at_top at_top :=
begin
apply h.tendsto_at_top_at_top,
intro b,
rcases not_bdd_above_iff.1 H b with ⟨_, ⟨N, rfl⟩, hN⟩,
exact ⟨N, le_of_lt hN⟩,
end
/-- If `u` is a monotone function with linear ordered codomain and the range of `u` is not bounded
below, then `tendsto u at_bot at_bot`. -/
lemma tendsto_at_bot_at_bot_of_monotone' [preorder ι] [linear_order α]
{u : ι → α} (h : monotone u) (H : ¬bdd_below (range u)) :
tendsto u at_bot at_bot :=
@tendsto_at_top_at_top_of_monotone' (order_dual ι) (order_dual α) _ _ _ h.order_dual H
lemma unbounded_of_tendsto_at_top [nonempty α] [semilattice_sup α] [preorder β] [no_top_order β]
{f : α → β} (h : tendsto f at_top at_top) :
¬ bdd_above (range f) :=
begin
rintros ⟨M, hM⟩,
cases mem_at_top_sets.mp (h $ Ioi_mem_at_top M) with a ha,
apply lt_irrefl M,
calc
M < f a : ha a (le_refl _)
... ≤ M : hM (set.mem_range_self a)
end
lemma unbounded_of_tendsto_at_bot [nonempty α] [semilattice_sup α] [preorder β] [no_bot_order β]
{f : α → β} (h : tendsto f at_top at_bot) :
¬ bdd_below (range f) :=
@unbounded_of_tendsto_at_top _ (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ _ h
lemma unbounded_of_tendsto_at_top' [nonempty α] [semilattice_inf α] [preorder β] [no_top_order β]
{f : α → β} (h : tendsto f at_bot at_top) :
¬ bdd_above (range f) :=
@unbounded_of_tendsto_at_top (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _ _ h
lemma unbounded_of_tendsto_at_bot' [nonempty α] [semilattice_inf α] [preorder β] [no_bot_order β]
{f : α → β} (h : tendsto f at_bot at_bot) :
¬ bdd_below (range f) :=
@unbounded_of_tendsto_at_top (order_dual α) (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ _ h
/-- If a monotone function `u : ι → α` tends to `at_top` along *some* non-trivial filter `l`, then
it tends to `at_top` along `at_top`. -/
lemma tendsto_at_top_of_monotone_of_filter [preorder ι] [preorder α] {l : filter ι}
{u : ι → α} (h : monotone u) [ne_bot l] (hu : tendsto u l at_top) :
tendsto u at_top at_top :=
h.tendsto_at_top_at_top $ λ b, (hu.eventually (mem_at_top b)).exists
/-- If a monotone function `u : ι → α` tends to `at_bot` along *some* non-trivial filter `l`, then
it tends to `at_bot` along `at_bot`. -/
lemma tendsto_at_bot_of_monotone_of_filter [preorder ι] [preorder α] {l : filter ι}
{u : ι → α} (h : monotone u) [ne_bot l] (hu : tendsto u l at_bot) :
tendsto u at_bot at_bot :=
@tendsto_at_top_of_monotone_of_filter (order_dual ι) (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ h.order_dual _ hu
lemma tendsto_at_top_of_monotone_of_subseq [preorder ι] [preorder α] {u : ι → α}
{φ : ι' → ι} (h : monotone u) {l : filter ι'} [ne_bot l]
(H : tendsto (u ∘ φ) l at_top) :
tendsto u at_top at_top :=
tendsto_at_top_of_monotone_of_filter h (tendsto_map' H)
lemma tendsto_at_bot_of_monotone_of_subseq [preorder ι] [preorder α] {u : ι → α}
{φ : ι' → ι} (h : monotone u) {l : filter ι'} [ne_bot l]
(H : tendsto (u ∘ φ) l at_bot) :
tendsto u at_bot at_bot :=
tendsto_at_bot_of_monotone_of_filter h (tendsto_map' H)
lemma tendsto_neg_at_top_at_bot [ordered_add_comm_group α] :
tendsto (has_neg.neg : α → α) at_top at_bot :=
begin
simp only [tendsto_at_bot, neg_le],
exact λ b, eventually_ge_at_top _
end
lemma tendsto_neg_at_bot_at_top [ordered_add_comm_group α] :
tendsto (has_neg.neg : α → α) at_bot at_top :=
@tendsto_neg_at_top_at_bot (order_dual α) _
/-- Let `f` and `g` be two maps to the same commutative monoid. This lemma gives a sufficient
condition for comparison of the filter `at_top.map (λ s, ∏ b in s, f b)` with
`at_top.map (λ s, ∏ b in s, g b)`. This is useful to compare the set of limit points of
`Π b in s, f b` as `s → at_top` with the similar set for `g`. -/
@[to_additive]
lemma map_at_top_finset_prod_le_of_prod_eq [comm_monoid α] {f : β → α} {g : γ → α}
(h_eq : ∀u:finset γ, ∃v:finset β, ∀v', v ⊆ v' → ∃u', u ⊆ u' ∧ ∏ x in u', g x = ∏ b in v', f b) :
at_top.map (λs:finset β, ∏ b in s, f b) ≤ at_top.map (λs:finset γ, ∏ x in s, g x) :=
by rw [map_at_top_eq, map_at_top_eq];
from (le_infi $ assume b, let ⟨v, hv⟩ := h_eq b in infi_le_of_le v $
by simp [set.image_subset_iff]; exact hv)
lemma has_antimono_basis.tendsto [semilattice_sup ι] [nonempty ι] {l : filter α}
{p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → set α} (hl : l.has_antimono_basis p s) {φ : ι → α}
(h : ∀ i : ι, φ i ∈ s i) : tendsto φ at_top l :=
(at_top_basis.tendsto_iff hl.to_has_basis).2 $ assume i hi,
⟨i, trivial, λ j hij, hl.decreasing hi (hl.mono hij hi) hij (h j)⟩
namespace is_countably_generated
/-- An abstract version of continuity of sequentially continuous functions on metric spaces:
if a filter `k` is countably generated then `tendsto f k l` iff for every sequence `u`
converging to `k`, `f ∘ u` tends to `l`. -/
lemma tendsto_iff_seq_tendsto {f : α → β} {k : filter α} {l : filter β}
(hcb : k.is_countably_generated) :
tendsto f k l ↔ (∀ x : ℕ → α, tendsto x at_top k → tendsto (f ∘ x) at_top l) :=
suffices (∀ x : ℕ → α, tendsto x at_top k → tendsto (f ∘ x) at_top l) → tendsto f k l,
from ⟨by intros; apply tendsto.comp; assumption, by assumption⟩,
begin
rcases hcb.exists_antimono_basis with ⟨g, gbasis, gmon, -⟩,
contrapose,
simp only [not_forall, gbasis.tendsto_left_iff, exists_const, not_exists, not_imp],
rintro ⟨B, hBl, hfBk⟩,
choose x h using hfBk,
use x, split,
{ exact (at_top_basis.tendsto_iff gbasis).2
(λ i _, ⟨i, trivial, λ j hj, gmon trivial trivial hj (h j).1⟩) },
{ simp only [tendsto_at_top', (∘), not_forall, not_exists],
use [B, hBl],
intro i, use [i, (le_refl _)],
apply (h i).right },
end
lemma tendsto_of_seq_tendsto {f : α → β} {k : filter α} {l : filter β}
(hcb : k.is_countably_generated) :
(∀ x : ℕ → α, tendsto x at_top k → tendsto (f ∘ x) at_top l) → tendsto f k l :=
hcb.tendsto_iff_seq_tendsto.2
lemma subseq_tendsto {f : filter α} (hf : is_countably_generated f)
{u : ℕ → α}
(hx : ne_bot (f ⊓ map u at_top)) :
∃ (θ : ℕ → ℕ), (strict_mono θ) ∧ (tendsto (u ∘ θ) at_top f) :=
begin
rcases hf.exists_antimono_basis with ⟨B, h⟩,
have : ∀ N, ∃ n ≥ N, u n ∈ B N,
from λ N, filter.inf_map_at_top_ne_bot_iff.mp hx _ (h.to_has_basis.mem_of_mem trivial) N,
choose φ hφ using this,
cases forall_and_distrib.mp hφ with φ_ge φ_in,
have lim_uφ : tendsto (u ∘ φ) at_top f,
from h.tendsto φ_in,
have lim_φ : tendsto φ at_top at_top,
from (tendsto_at_top_mono φ_ge tendsto_id),
obtain ⟨ψ, hψ, hψφ⟩ : ∃ ψ : ℕ → ℕ, strict_mono ψ ∧ strict_mono (φ ∘ ψ),
from strict_mono_subseq_of_tendsto_at_top lim_φ,
exact ⟨φ ∘ ψ, hψφ, lim_uφ.comp $ strict_mono_tendsto_at_top hψ⟩,
end
end is_countably_generated
end filter
open filter finset
/-- Let `g : γ → β` be an injective function and `f : β → α` be a function from the codomain of `g`
to a commutative monoid. Suppose that `f x = 1` outside of the range of `g`. Then the filters
`at_top.map (λ s, ∏ i in s, f (g i))` and `at_top.map (λ s, ∏ i in s, f i)` coincide.
The additive version of this lemma is used to prove the equality `∑' x, f (g x) = ∑' y, f y` under
the same assumptions.-/
@[to_additive]
lemma function.injective.map_at_top_finset_prod_eq [comm_monoid α] {g : γ → β}
(hg : function.injective g) {f : β → α} (hf : ∀ x ∉ set.range g, f x = 1) :
map (λ s, ∏ i in s, f (g i)) at_top = map (λ s, ∏ i in s, f i) at_top :=
begin
apply le_antisymm; refine map_at_top_finset_prod_le_of_prod_eq (λ s, _),
{ refine ⟨s.preimage g (hg.inj_on _), λ t ht, _⟩,
refine ⟨t.image g ∪ s, finset.subset_union_right _ _, _⟩,
rw [← finset.prod_image (hg.inj_on _)],
refine (prod_subset (subset_union_left _ _) _).symm,
simp only [finset.mem_union, finset.mem_image],
refine λ y hy hyt, hf y (mt _ hyt),
rintros ⟨x, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨x, ht (finset.mem_preimage.2 $ hy.resolve_left hyt), rfl⟩ },
{ refine ⟨s.image g, λ t ht, _⟩,
simp only [← prod_preimage _ _ (hg.inj_on _) _ (λ x _, hf x)],
exact ⟨_, (image_subset_iff_subset_preimage _).1 ht, rfl⟩ }
end
/-- Let `g : γ → β` be an injective function and `f : β → α` be a function from the codomain of `g`
to an additive commutative monoid. Suppose that `f x = 0` outside of the range of `g`. Then the
filters `at_top.map (λ s, ∑ i in s, f (g i))` and `at_top.map (λ s, ∑ i in s, f i)` coincide.
This lemma is used to prove the equality `∑' x, f (g x) = ∑' y, f y` under
the same assumptions.-/
add_decl_doc function.injective.map_at_top_finset_sum_eq
|
9b491c9bebb856ad266b2a18e053affc1437ffa6 | d436468d80b739ba7e06843c4d0d2070e43448e5 | /src/ring_theory/adjoin_root.lean | 35b5284da12d1ef1eb4822b7b1c3fa47c3afd9d1 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | roro47/mathlib | 761fdc002aef92f77818f3fef06bf6ec6fc1a28e | 80aa7d52537571a2ca62a3fdf71c9533a09422cf | refs/heads/master | 1,599,656,410,625 | 1,573,649,488,000 | 1,573,649,488,000 | 221,452,951 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,573,647,693,000 | 1,573,647,692,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,649 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Chris Hughes
Adjoining roots of polynomials
-/
import data.polynomial ring_theory.principal_ideal_domain
noncomputable theory
universes u v w
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
open polynomial ideal
def adjoin_root [comm_ring α] (f : polynomial α) : Type u :=
ideal.quotient (span {f} : ideal (polynomial α))
namespace adjoin_root
section comm_ring
variables [comm_ring α] (f : polynomial α)
instance : comm_ring (adjoin_root f) := ideal.quotient.comm_ring _
instance : decidable_eq (adjoin_root f) := classical.dec_eq _
variable {f}
def mk : polynomial α → adjoin_root f := ideal.quotient.mk _
def root : adjoin_root f := mk X
def of (x : α) : adjoin_root f := mk (C x)
instance adjoin_root.has_coe_t : has_coe_t α (adjoin_root f) := ⟨of⟩
instance mk.is_ring_hom : is_ring_hom (mk : polynomial α → adjoin_root f) :=
ideal.quotient.is_ring_hom_mk _
@[simp] lemma mk_self : (mk f : adjoin_root f) = 0 :=
quotient.sound' (mem_span_singleton.2 $ by simp)
instance : is_ring_hom (coe : α → adjoin_root f) :=
@is_ring_hom.comp _ _ _ _ C _ _ _ mk mk.is_ring_hom
lemma eval₂_root (f : polynomial α) : f.eval₂ coe (root : adjoin_root f) = 0 :=
quotient.induction_on' (root : adjoin_root f)
(λ (g : polynomial α) (hg : mk g = mk X),
show finsupp.sum f (λ (e : ℕ) (a : α), mk (C a) * mk g ^ e) = 0,
by simp only [hg, (is_semiring_hom.map_pow (mk : polynomial α → adjoin_root f) _ _).symm,
(is_ring_hom.map_mul (mk : polynomial α → adjoin_root f)).symm];
rw [finsupp.sum, finset.sum_hom (mk : polynomial α → adjoin_root f),
show finset.sum _ _ = _, from sum_C_mul_X_eq _, mk_self])
(show (root : adjoin_root f) = mk X, from rfl)
lemma is_root_root (f : polynomial α) : is_root (f.map coe) (root : adjoin_root f) :=
by rw [is_root, eval_map, eval₂_root]
variables [comm_ring β]
def lift (i : α → β) [is_ring_hom i] (x : β) (h : f.eval₂ i x = 0) : (adjoin_root f) → β :=
ideal.quotient.lift _ (eval₂ i x) $ λ g H,
begin
simp [mem_span_singleton] at H,
cases H with y H,
rw [H, eval₂_mul],
simp [h]
end
variables {i : α → β} [is_ring_hom i] {a : β} {h : f.eval₂ i a = 0}
@[simp] lemma lift_mk {g : polynomial α} : lift i a h (mk g) = g.eval₂ i a :=
ideal.quotient.lift_mk
@[simp] lemma lift_root : lift i a h root = a := by simp [root, h]
@[simp] lemma lift_of {x : α} : lift i a h x = i x :=
by show lift i a h (ideal.quotient.mk _ (C x)) = i x;
convert ideal.quotient.lift_mk; simp
instance is_ring_hom_lift : is_ring_hom (lift i a h) :=
by unfold lift; apply_instance
end comm_ring
variables [discrete_field α] {f : polynomial α} [irreducible f]
instance is_maximal_span : is_maximal (span {f} : ideal (polynomial α)) :=
principal_ideal_domain.is_maximal_of_irreducible ‹irreducible f›
noncomputable instance field : discrete_field (adjoin_root f) :=
ideal.quotient.field (span {f} : ideal (polynomial α))
instance : is_field_hom (coe : α → adjoin_root f) := by apply_instance
instance lift_is_field_hom [field β] {i : α → β} [is_ring_hom i] {a : β}
{h : f.eval₂ i a = 0} : is_field_hom (lift i a h) := by apply_instance
lemma coe_injective : function.injective (coe : α → adjoin_root f) :=
is_field_hom.injective _
lemma mul_div_root_cancel (f : polynomial α) [irreducible f] :
(X - C (root : adjoin_root f)) * (f.map coe / (X - C root)) = f.map coe :=
mul_div_eq_iff_is_root.2 $ is_root_root _
end adjoin_root
|
02a15b36175ebf5ce8cf090fa5f1762b36d927cc | f4bff2062c030df03d65e8b69c88f79b63a359d8 | /src/game/max/level10.lean | b14dd4bb4e1a4243e65d77d05a552e55641c4f89 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | adastra7470/real-number-game | 776606961f52db0eb824555ed2f8e16f92216ea3 | f9dcb7d9255a79b57e62038228a23346c2dc301b | refs/heads/master | 1,669,221,575,893 | 1,594,669,800,000 | 1,594,669,800,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 739 | lean | import game.max.level09 -- hide
open_locale classical -- hide
noncomputable theory -- hide
namespace xena -- hide
/-
# Chapter ? : Max
## Level 10
And finally `lt_max_iff`.
-/
/- Lemma
If $a$, $b$, $c$ are real numbers,
then $a<\max(b,c)$ iff ($a<b$ or $a<c$).
-/
theorem lt_max_iff {a b c : ℝ} : a < max b c ↔ a < b ∨ a < c :=
begin
split,
{ intro ha,
cases le_total b c with hbc hcb,
{ rw max_eq_right hbc at ha,
right,
assumption,
},
{ rw max_eq_left hcb at ha,
left,
assumption
}
},
{ intro habc,
cases habc with hab hac,
{ apply lt_of_lt_of_le hab,
apply le_max_left},
{ apply lt_of_lt_of_le hac,
apply le_max_right},
}
end
end xena --hide
|
08fae2dd3f584f3caf7fe8ada5a539e4eef1baea | b70031c8e2c5337b91d7e70f1e0c5f528f7b0e77 | /src/ring_theory/ideal/basic.lean | 11659e978ea263d274cfe736ed5ab90699422cd2 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | molodiuc/mathlib | cae2ba3ef1601c1f42ca0b625c79b061b63fef5b | 98ebe5a6739fbe254f9ee9d401882d4388f91035 | refs/heads/master | 1,674,237,127,059 | 1,606,353,533,000 | 1,606,353,533,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 32,116 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Chris Hughes, Mario Carneiro
-/
import algebra.associated
import linear_algebra.basic
import order.zorn
/-!
# Ideals over a ring
This file defines `ideal R`, the type of ideals over a commutative ring `R`.
## Implementation notes
`ideal R` is implemented using `submodule R R`, where `•` is interpreted as `*`.
## TODO
Support one-sided ideals, and ideals over non-commutative rings.
See `algebra.ring_quot` for quotients of non-commutative rings.
-/
universes u v w
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
open set function
open_locale classical big_operators
/-- Ideal in a commutative ring is an additive subgroup `s` such that
`a * b ∈ s` whenever `b ∈ s`. -/
@[reducible] def ideal (R : Type u) [comm_ring R] := submodule R R
namespace ideal
variables [comm_ring α] (I : ideal α) {a b : α}
protected lemma zero_mem : (0 : α) ∈ I := I.zero_mem
protected lemma add_mem : a ∈ I → b ∈ I → a + b ∈ I := I.add_mem
lemma neg_mem_iff : -a ∈ I ↔ a ∈ I := I.neg_mem_iff
lemma add_mem_iff_left : b ∈ I → (a + b ∈ I ↔ a ∈ I) := I.add_mem_iff_left
lemma add_mem_iff_right : a ∈ I → (a + b ∈ I ↔ b ∈ I) := I.add_mem_iff_right
protected lemma sub_mem : a ∈ I → b ∈ I → a - b ∈ I := I.sub_mem
lemma mul_mem_left : b ∈ I → a * b ∈ I := I.smul_mem _
lemma mul_mem_right (h : a ∈ I) : a * b ∈ I := mul_comm b a ▸ I.mul_mem_left h
end ideal
variables {a b : α}
-- A separate namespace definition is needed because the variables were historically in a different order
namespace ideal
variables [comm_ring α] (I : ideal α)
@[ext] lemma ext {I J : ideal α} (h : ∀ x, x ∈ I ↔ x ∈ J) : I = J :=
submodule.ext h
theorem eq_top_of_unit_mem
(x y : α) (hx : x ∈ I) (h : y * x = 1) : I = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 $ λ z _, calc
z = z * (y * x) : by simp [h]
... = (z * y) * x : eq.symm $ mul_assoc z y x
... ∈ I : I.mul_mem_left hx
theorem eq_top_of_is_unit_mem {x} (hx : x ∈ I) (h : is_unit x) : I = ⊤ :=
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := is_unit_iff_exists_inv'.1 h in eq_top_of_unit_mem I x y hx hy
theorem eq_top_iff_one : I = ⊤ ↔ (1:α) ∈ I :=
⟨by rintro rfl; trivial,
λ h, eq_top_of_unit_mem _ _ 1 h (by simp)⟩
theorem ne_top_iff_one : I ≠ ⊤ ↔ (1:α) ∉ I :=
not_congr I.eq_top_iff_one
@[simp]
theorem unit_mul_mem_iff_mem {x y : α} (hy : is_unit y) : y * x ∈ I ↔ x ∈ I :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, λ h, I.smul_mem y h⟩,
obtain ⟨y', hy'⟩ := is_unit_iff_exists_inv.1 hy,
have := I.smul_mem y' h,
rwa [smul_eq_mul, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm y' y, hy', one_mul] at this,
end
@[simp]
theorem mul_unit_mem_iff_mem {x y : α} (hy : is_unit y) : x * y ∈ I ↔ x ∈ I :=
mul_comm y x ▸ unit_mul_mem_iff_mem I hy
/-- The ideal generated by a subset of a ring -/
def span (s : set α) : ideal α := submodule.span α s
lemma subset_span {s : set α} : s ⊆ span s := submodule.subset_span
lemma span_le {s : set α} {I} : span s ≤ I ↔ s ⊆ I := submodule.span_le
lemma span_mono {s t : set α} : s ⊆ t → span s ≤ span t := submodule.span_mono
@[simp] lemma span_eq : span (I : set α) = I := submodule.span_eq _
@[simp] lemma span_singleton_one : span (1 : set α) = ⊤ :=
(eq_top_iff_one _).2 $ subset_span $ mem_singleton _
lemma mem_span_insert {s : set α} {x y} :
x ∈ span (insert y s) ↔ ∃ a (z ∈ span s), x = a * y + z := submodule.mem_span_insert
lemma mem_span_insert' {s : set α} {x y} :
x ∈ span (insert y s) ↔ ∃a, x + a * y ∈ span s := submodule.mem_span_insert'
lemma mem_span_singleton' {x y : α} :
x ∈ span ({y} : set α) ↔ ∃ a, a * y = x := submodule.mem_span_singleton
lemma mem_span_singleton {x y : α} :
x ∈ span ({y} : set α) ↔ y ∣ x :=
mem_span_singleton'.trans $ exists_congr $ λ _, by rw [eq_comm, mul_comm]
lemma span_singleton_le_span_singleton {x y : α} :
span ({x} : set α) ≤ span ({y} : set α) ↔ y ∣ x :=
span_le.trans $ singleton_subset_iff.trans mem_span_singleton
lemma span_singleton_eq_span_singleton {α : Type u} [integral_domain α] {x y : α} :
span ({x} : set α) = span ({y} : set α) ↔ associated x y :=
begin
rw [←dvd_dvd_iff_associated, le_antisymm_iff, and_comm],
apply and_congr;
rw span_singleton_le_span_singleton,
end
lemma span_eq_bot {s : set α} : span s = ⊥ ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, (x:α) = 0 := submodule.span_eq_bot
@[simp] lemma span_singleton_eq_bot {x} : span ({x} : set α) = ⊥ ↔ x = 0 :=
submodule.span_singleton_eq_bot
@[simp] lemma span_zero : span (0 : set α) = ⊥ := by rw [←set.singleton_zero, span_singleton_eq_bot]
lemma span_singleton_eq_top {x} : span ({x} : set α) = ⊤ ↔ is_unit x :=
by rw [is_unit_iff_dvd_one, ← span_singleton_le_span_singleton, singleton_one, span_singleton_one,
eq_top_iff]
lemma span_singleton_mul_right_unit {a : α} (h2 : is_unit a) (x : α) :
span ({x * a} : set α) = span {x} :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ rw span_singleton_le_span_singleton, use a},
{ rw span_singleton_le_span_singleton, rw is_unit.mul_right_dvd h2}
end
lemma span_singleton_mul_left_unit {a : α} (h2 : is_unit a) (x : α) :
span ({a * x} : set α) = span {x} := by rw [mul_comm, span_singleton_mul_right_unit h2]
/--
The ideal generated by an arbitrary binary relation.
-/
def of_rel (r : α → α → Prop) : ideal α :=
submodule.span α { x | ∃ (a b) (h : r a b), x = a - b }
/-- An ideal `P` of a ring `R` is prime if `P ≠ R` and `xy ∈ P → x ∈ P ∨ y ∈ P` -/
@[class] def is_prime (I : ideal α) : Prop :=
I ≠ ⊤ ∧ ∀ {x y : α}, x * y ∈ I → x ∈ I ∨ y ∈ I
theorem is_prime.mem_or_mem {I : ideal α} (hI : I.is_prime) :
∀ {x y : α}, x * y ∈ I → x ∈ I ∨ y ∈ I := hI.2
theorem is_prime.mem_or_mem_of_mul_eq_zero {I : ideal α} (hI : I.is_prime)
{x y : α} (h : x * y = 0) : x ∈ I ∨ y ∈ I :=
hI.2 (h.symm ▸ I.zero_mem)
theorem is_prime.mem_of_pow_mem {I : ideal α} (hI : I.is_prime)
{r : α} (n : ℕ) (H : r^n ∈ I) : r ∈ I :=
begin
induction n with n ih,
{ exact (mt (eq_top_iff_one _).2 hI.1).elim H },
exact or.cases_on (hI.mem_or_mem H) id ih
end
lemma not_is_prime_iff {I : ideal α} : ¬ I.is_prime ↔ I = ⊤ ∨ ∃ (x ∉ I) (y ∉ I), x * y ∈ I :=
begin
simp_rw [ideal.is_prime, not_and_distrib, ne.def, not_not, not_forall, not_or_distrib],
exact or_congr iff.rfl
⟨λ ⟨x, y, hxy, hx, hy⟩, ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩, λ ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩, ⟨x, y, hxy, hx, hy⟩⟩
end
theorem zero_ne_one_of_proper {I : ideal α} (h : I ≠ ⊤) : (0:α) ≠ 1 :=
λ hz, I.ne_top_iff_one.1 h $ hz ▸ I.zero_mem
theorem span_singleton_prime {p : α} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
is_prime (span ({p} : set α)) ↔ prime p :=
by simp [is_prime, prime, span_singleton_eq_top, hp, mem_span_singleton]
lemma bot_prime {R : Type*} [integral_domain R] : (⊥ : ideal R).is_prime :=
⟨λ h, one_ne_zero (by rwa [ideal.eq_top_iff_one, submodule.mem_bot] at h),
λ x y h, mul_eq_zero.mp (by simpa only [submodule.mem_bot] using h)⟩
/-- An ideal is maximal if it is maximal in the collection of proper ideals. -/
@[class] def is_maximal (I : ideal α) : Prop :=
I ≠ ⊤ ∧ ∀ J, I < J → J = ⊤
theorem is_maximal_iff {I : ideal α} : I.is_maximal ↔
(1:α) ∉ I ∧ ∀ (J : ideal α) x, I ≤ J → x ∉ I → x ∈ J → (1:α) ∈ J :=
and_congr I.ne_top_iff_one $ forall_congr $ λ J,
by rw [lt_iff_le_not_le]; exact
⟨λ H x h hx₁ hx₂, J.eq_top_iff_one.1 $
H ⟨h, not_subset.2 ⟨_, hx₂, hx₁⟩⟩,
λ H ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, let ⟨x, xJ, xI⟩ := not_subset.1 h₂ in
J.eq_top_iff_one.2 $ H x h₁ xI xJ⟩
theorem is_maximal.eq_of_le {I J : ideal α}
(hI : I.is_maximal) (hJ : J ≠ ⊤) (IJ : I ≤ J) : I = J :=
eq_iff_le_not_lt.2 ⟨IJ, λ h, hJ (hI.2 _ h)⟩
theorem is_maximal.exists_inv {I : ideal α}
(hI : I.is_maximal) {x} (hx : x ∉ I) : ∃ y, y * x - 1 ∈ I :=
begin
cases is_maximal_iff.1 hI with H₁ H₂,
rcases mem_span_insert'.1 (H₂ (span (insert x I)) x
(set.subset.trans (subset_insert _ _) subset_span)
hx (subset_span (mem_insert _ _))) with ⟨y, hy⟩,
rw [span_eq, ← neg_mem_iff, add_comm, neg_add', neg_mul_eq_neg_mul] at hy,
exact ⟨-y, hy⟩
end
theorem is_maximal.is_prime {I : ideal α} (H : I.is_maximal) : I.is_prime :=
⟨H.1, λ x y hxy, or_iff_not_imp_left.2 $ λ hx, begin
cases H.exists_inv hx with z hz,
have := I.mul_mem_left hz,
rw [mul_sub, mul_one, mul_comm, mul_assoc] at this,
exact I.neg_mem_iff.1 ((I.add_mem_iff_right $ I.mul_mem_left hxy).1 this)
end⟩
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance is_maximal.is_prime' (I : ideal α) : ∀ [H : I.is_maximal], I.is_prime :=
is_maximal.is_prime
/-- Krull's theorem: if `I` is an ideal that is not the whole ring, then it is included in some
maximal ideal. -/
theorem exists_le_maximal (I : ideal α) (hI : I ≠ ⊤) :
∃ M : ideal α, M.is_maximal ∧ I ≤ M :=
begin
rcases zorn.zorn_partial_order₀ { J : ideal α | J ≠ ⊤ } _ I hI with ⟨M, M0, IM, h⟩,
{ refine ⟨M, ⟨M0, λ J hJ, by_contradiction $ λ J0, _⟩, IM⟩,
cases h J J0 (le_of_lt hJ), exact lt_irrefl _ hJ },
{ intros S SC cC I IS,
refine ⟨Sup S, λ H, _, λ _, le_Sup⟩,
obtain ⟨J, JS, J0⟩ : ∃ J ∈ S, (1 : α) ∈ J,
from (submodule.mem_Sup_of_directed ⟨I, IS⟩ cC.directed_on).1 ((eq_top_iff_one _).1 H),
exact SC JS ((eq_top_iff_one _).2 J0) }
end
/-- Krull's theorem: a nontrivial ring has a maximal ideal. -/
theorem exists_maximal [nontrivial α] : ∃ M : ideal α, M.is_maximal :=
let ⟨I, ⟨hI, _⟩⟩ := exists_le_maximal (⊥ : ideal α) submodule.bot_ne_top in ⟨I, hI⟩
/-- If P is not properly contained in any maximal ideal then it is not properly contained
in any proper ideal -/
lemma maximal_of_no_maximal {R : Type u} [comm_ring R] {P : ideal R}
(hmax : ∀ m : ideal R, P < m → ¬is_maximal m) (J : ideal R) (hPJ : P < J) : J = ⊤ :=
begin
by_contradiction hnonmax,
rcases exists_le_maximal J hnonmax with ⟨M, hM1, hM2⟩,
exact hmax M (lt_of_lt_of_le hPJ hM2) hM1,
end
theorem mem_span_pair {x y z : α} :
z ∈ span ({x, y} : set α) ↔ ∃ a b, a * x + b * y = z :=
by simp [mem_span_insert, mem_span_singleton', @eq_comm _ _ z]
lemma span_singleton_lt_span_singleton [integral_domain β] {x y : β} :
span ({x} : set β) < span ({y} : set β) ↔ dvd_not_unit y x :=
by rw [lt_iff_le_not_le, span_singleton_le_span_singleton, span_singleton_le_span_singleton,
dvd_and_not_dvd_iff]
lemma factors_decreasing [integral_domain β] (b₁ b₂ : β) (h₁ : b₁ ≠ 0) (h₂ : ¬ is_unit b₂) :
span ({b₁ * b₂} : set β) < span {b₁} :=
lt_of_le_not_le (ideal.span_le.2 $ singleton_subset_iff.2 $
ideal.mem_span_singleton.2 ⟨b₂, rfl⟩) $ λ h,
h₂ $ is_unit_of_dvd_one _ $ (mul_dvd_mul_iff_left h₁).1 $
by rwa [mul_one, ← ideal.span_singleton_le_span_singleton]
/-- The quotient `R/I` of a ring `R` by an ideal `I`. -/
def quotient (I : ideal α) := I.quotient
namespace quotient
variables {I} {x y : α}
instance (I : ideal α) : has_one I.quotient := ⟨submodule.quotient.mk 1⟩
instance (I : ideal α) : has_mul I.quotient :=
⟨λ a b, quotient.lift_on₂' a b (λ a b, submodule.quotient.mk (a * b)) $
λ a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ h₁ h₂, quot.sound $ begin
refine calc a₁ * a₂ - b₁ * b₂ = a₂ * (a₁ - b₁) + (a₂ - b₂) * b₁ : _
... ∈ I : I.add_mem (I.mul_mem_left h₁) (I.mul_mem_right h₂),
rw [mul_sub, sub_mul, sub_add_sub_cancel, mul_comm, mul_comm b₁]
end⟩
instance (I : ideal α) : comm_ring I.quotient :=
{ mul := (*),
one := 1,
mul_assoc := λ a b c, quotient.induction_on₃' a b c $
λ a b c, congr_arg submodule.quotient.mk (mul_assoc a b c),
mul_comm := λ a b, quotient.induction_on₂' a b $
λ a b, congr_arg submodule.quotient.mk (mul_comm a b),
one_mul := λ a, quotient.induction_on' a $
λ a, congr_arg submodule.quotient.mk (one_mul a),
mul_one := λ a, quotient.induction_on' a $
λ a, congr_arg submodule.quotient.mk (mul_one a),
left_distrib := λ a b c, quotient.induction_on₃' a b c $
λ a b c, congr_arg submodule.quotient.mk (left_distrib a b c),
right_distrib := λ a b c, quotient.induction_on₃' a b c $
λ a b c, congr_arg submodule.quotient.mk (right_distrib a b c),
..submodule.quotient.add_comm_group I }
/-- The ring homomorphism from a ring `R` to a quotient ring `R/I`. -/
def mk (I : ideal α) : α →+* I.quotient :=
⟨λ a, submodule.quotient.mk a, rfl, λ _ _, rfl, rfl, λ _ _, rfl⟩
instance : inhabited (quotient I) := ⟨mk I 37⟩
protected theorem eq : mk I x = mk I y ↔ x - y ∈ I := submodule.quotient.eq I
@[simp] theorem mk_eq_mk (x : α) : (submodule.quotient.mk x : quotient I) = mk I x := rfl
lemma eq_zero_iff_mem {I : ideal α} : mk I a = 0 ↔ a ∈ I :=
by conv {to_rhs, rw ← sub_zero a }; exact quotient.eq'
theorem zero_eq_one_iff {I : ideal α} : (0 : I.quotient) = 1 ↔ I = ⊤ :=
eq_comm.trans $ eq_zero_iff_mem.trans (eq_top_iff_one _).symm
theorem zero_ne_one_iff {I : ideal α} : (0 : I.quotient) ≠ 1 ↔ I ≠ ⊤ :=
not_congr zero_eq_one_iff
protected theorem nontrivial {I : ideal α} (hI : I ≠ ⊤) : nontrivial I.quotient :=
⟨⟨0, 1, zero_ne_one_iff.2 hI⟩⟩
lemma mk_surjective : function.surjective (mk I) :=
λ y, quotient.induction_on' y (λ x, exists.intro x rfl)
instance (I : ideal α) [hI : I.is_prime] : integral_domain I.quotient :=
{ eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero := λ a b,
quotient.induction_on₂' a b $ λ a b hab,
(hI.mem_or_mem (eq_zero_iff_mem.1 hab)).elim
(or.inl ∘ eq_zero_iff_mem.2)
(or.inr ∘ eq_zero_iff_mem.2),
.. quotient.comm_ring I,
.. quotient.nontrivial hI.1 }
lemma is_integral_domain_iff_prime (I : ideal α) : is_integral_domain I.quotient ↔ I.is_prime :=
⟨ λ ⟨h1, h2, h3⟩, ⟨zero_ne_one_iff.1 $ @zero_ne_one _ _ ⟨h1⟩, λ x y h,
by { simp only [←eq_zero_iff_mem, (mk I).map_mul] at ⊢ h, exact h3 _ _ h}⟩,
λ h, by exactI integral_domain.to_is_integral_domain I.quotient⟩
lemma exists_inv {I : ideal α} [hI : I.is_maximal] :
∀ {a : I.quotient}, a ≠ 0 → ∃ b : I.quotient, a * b = 1 :=
begin
rintro ⟨a⟩ h,
cases hI.exists_inv (mt eq_zero_iff_mem.2 h) with b hb,
rw [mul_comm] at hb,
exact ⟨mk _ b, quot.sound hb⟩
end
/-- quotient by maximal ideal is a field. def rather than instance, since users will have
computable inverses in some applications -/
protected noncomputable def field (I : ideal α) [hI : I.is_maximal] : field I.quotient :=
{ inv := λ a, if ha : a = 0 then 0 else classical.some (exists_inv ha),
mul_inv_cancel := λ a (ha : a ≠ 0), show a * dite _ _ _ = _,
by rw dif_neg ha;
exact classical.some_spec (exists_inv ha),
inv_zero := dif_pos rfl,
..quotient.integral_domain I }
/-- If the quotient by an ideal is a field, then the ideal is maximal. -/
theorem maximal_of_is_field (I : ideal α)
(hqf : is_field I.quotient) : I.is_maximal :=
begin
apply ideal.is_maximal_iff.2,
split,
{ intro h,
rcases hqf.exists_pair_ne with ⟨⟨x⟩, ⟨y⟩, hxy⟩,
exact hxy (ideal.quotient.eq.2 (mul_one (x - y) ▸ I.mul_mem_left h)) },
{ intros J x hIJ hxnI hxJ,
rcases hqf.mul_inv_cancel (mt ideal.quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem.1 hxnI) with ⟨⟨y⟩, hy⟩,
rw [← zero_add (1 : α), ← sub_self (x * y), sub_add],
refine J.sub_mem (J.mul_mem_right hxJ) (hIJ (ideal.quotient.eq.1 hy)) }
end
/-- The quotient of a ring by an ideal is a field iff the ideal is maximal. -/
theorem maximal_ideal_iff_is_field_quotient (I : ideal α) :
I.is_maximal ↔ is_field I.quotient :=
⟨λ h, @field.to_is_field I.quotient (@ideal.quotient.field _ _ I h),
λ h, maximal_of_is_field I h⟩
variable [comm_ring β]
/-- Given a ring homomorphism `f : α →+* β` sending all elements of an ideal to zero,
lift it to the quotient by this ideal. -/
def lift (S : ideal α) (f : α →+* β) (H : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ S → f a = 0) :
quotient S →+* β :=
{ to_fun := λ x, quotient.lift_on' x f $ λ (a b) (h : _ ∈ _),
eq_of_sub_eq_zero $ by rw [← f.map_sub, H _ h],
map_one' := f.map_one,
map_zero' := f.map_zero,
map_add' := λ a₁ a₂, quotient.induction_on₂' a₁ a₂ f.map_add,
map_mul' := λ a₁ a₂, quotient.induction_on₂' a₁ a₂ f.map_mul }
@[simp] lemma lift_mk (S : ideal α) (f : α →+* β) (H : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ S → f a = 0) :
lift S f H (mk S a) = f a := rfl
end quotient
section lattice
variables {R : Type u} [comm_ring R]
lemma mem_sup_left {S T : ideal R} : ∀ {x : R}, x ∈ S → x ∈ S ⊔ T :=
show S ≤ S ⊔ T, from le_sup_left
lemma mem_sup_right {S T : ideal R} : ∀ {x : R}, x ∈ T → x ∈ S ⊔ T :=
show T ≤ S ⊔ T, from le_sup_right
lemma mem_supr_of_mem {ι : Type*} {S : ι → ideal R} (i : ι) :
∀ {x : R}, x ∈ S i → x ∈ supr S :=
show S i ≤ supr S, from le_supr _ _
lemma mem_Sup_of_mem {S : set (ideal R)} {s : ideal R}
(hs : s ∈ S) : ∀ {x : R}, x ∈ s → x ∈ Sup S :=
show s ≤ Sup S, from le_Sup hs
theorem mem_Inf {s : set (ideal R)} {x : R} :
x ∈ Inf s ↔ ∀ ⦃I⦄, I ∈ s → x ∈ I :=
⟨λ hx I his, hx I ⟨I, infi_pos his⟩, λ H I ⟨J, hij⟩, hij ▸ λ S ⟨hj, hS⟩, hS ▸ H hj⟩
@[simp] lemma mem_inf {I J : ideal R} {x : R} : x ∈ I ⊓ J ↔ x ∈ I ∧ x ∈ J := iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_infi {ι : Type*} {I : ι → ideal R} {x : R} : x ∈ infi I ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ I i :=
submodule.mem_infi _
@[simp] lemma mem_bot {x : R} : x ∈ (⊥ : ideal R) ↔ x = 0 :=
submodule.mem_bot _
end lattice
/-- All ideals in a field are trivial. -/
lemma eq_bot_or_top {K : Type u} [field K] (I : ideal K) :
I = ⊥ ∨ I = ⊤ :=
begin
rw or_iff_not_imp_right,
change _ ≠ _ → _,
rw ideal.ne_top_iff_one,
intro h1,
rw eq_bot_iff,
intros r hr,
by_cases H : r = 0, {simpa},
simpa [H, h1] using submodule.smul_mem I r⁻¹ hr,
end
lemma eq_bot_of_prime {K : Type u} [field K] (I : ideal K) [h : I.is_prime] :
I = ⊥ :=
or_iff_not_imp_right.mp I.eq_bot_or_top h.1
lemma bot_is_maximal {K : Type u} [field K] : is_maximal (⊥ : ideal K) :=
⟨λ h, absurd ((eq_top_iff_one (⊤ : ideal K)).mp rfl) (by rw ← h; simp),
λ I hI, or_iff_not_imp_left.mp (eq_bot_or_top I) (ne_of_gt hI)⟩
section pi
variables (ι : Type v)
/-- `I^n` as an ideal of `R^n`. -/
def pi : ideal (ι → α) :=
{ carrier := { x | ∀ i, x i ∈ I },
zero_mem' := λ i, submodule.zero_mem _,
add_mem' := λ a b ha hb i, submodule.add_mem _ (ha i) (hb i),
smul_mem' := λ a b hb i, ideal.mul_mem_left _ (hb i) }
lemma mem_pi (x : ι → α) : x ∈ I.pi ι ↔ ∀ i, x i ∈ I := iff.rfl
/-- `R^n/I^n` is a `R/I`-module. -/
instance module_pi : module (I.quotient) (I.pi ι).quotient :=
begin
refine { smul := λ c m, quotient.lift_on₂' c m (λ r m, submodule.quotient.mk $ r • m) _, .. },
{ intros c₁ m₁ c₂ m₂ hc hm,
change c₁ - c₂ ∈ I at hc,
change m₁ - m₂ ∈ (I.pi ι) at hm,
apply ideal.quotient.eq.2,
have : c₁ • (m₂ - m₁) ∈ I.pi ι,
{ rw ideal.mem_pi,
intro i,
simp only [smul_eq_mul, pi.smul_apply, pi.sub_apply],
apply ideal.mul_mem_left,
rw ←ideal.neg_mem_iff,
simpa only [neg_sub] using hm i },
rw [←ideal.add_mem_iff_left (I.pi ι) this, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, ←add_assoc, ←smul_add,
sub_add_cancel, ←sub_eq_add_neg, ←sub_smul, ideal.mem_pi],
exact λ i, ideal.mul_mem_right _ hc },
all_goals { rintro ⟨a⟩ ⟨b⟩ ⟨c⟩ <|> rintro ⟨a⟩,
simp only [(•), submodule.quotient.quot_mk_eq_mk, ideal.quotient.mk_eq_mk],
change ideal.quotient.mk _ _ = ideal.quotient.mk _ _,
congr' with i, simp [mul_assoc, mul_add, add_mul] }
end
/-- `R^n/I^n` is isomorphic to `(R/I)^n` as an `R/I`-module. -/
noncomputable def pi_quot_equiv : (I.pi ι).quotient ≃ₗ[I.quotient] (ι → I.quotient) :=
{ to_fun := λ x, quotient.lift_on' x (λ f i, ideal.quotient.mk I (f i)) $
λ a b hab, funext (λ i, ideal.quotient.eq.2 (hab i)),
map_add' := by { rintros ⟨_⟩ ⟨_⟩, refl },
map_smul' := by { rintros ⟨_⟩ ⟨_⟩, refl },
inv_fun := λ x, ideal.quotient.mk (I.pi ι) $ λ i, quotient.out' (x i),
left_inv :=
begin
rintro ⟨x⟩,
exact ideal.quotient.eq.2 (λ i, ideal.quotient.eq.1 (quotient.out_eq' _))
end,
right_inv :=
begin
intro x,
ext i,
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := @quot.exists_rep _ _ (x i),
simp_rw ←hr,
convert quotient.out_eq' _
end }
/-- If `f : R^n → R^m` is an `R`-linear map and `I ⊆ R` is an ideal, then the image of `I^n` is
contained in `I^m`. -/
lemma map_pi {ι} [fintype ι] {ι' : Type w} (x : ι → α) (hi : ∀ i, x i ∈ I)
(f : (ι → α) →ₗ[α] (ι' → α)) (i : ι') : f x i ∈ I :=
begin
rw pi_eq_sum_univ x,
simp only [finset.sum_apply, smul_eq_mul, linear_map.map_sum, pi.smul_apply, linear_map.map_smul],
exact submodule.sum_mem _ (λ j hj, ideal.mul_mem_right _ (hi j))
end
end pi
end ideal
namespace ring
variables {R : Type*} [comm_ring R]
lemma not_is_field_of_subsingleton {R : Type*} [ring R] [subsingleton R] : ¬ is_field R :=
λ ⟨⟨x, y, hxy⟩, _, _⟩, hxy (subsingleton.elim x y)
lemma exists_not_is_unit_of_not_is_field [nontrivial R] (hf : ¬ is_field R) :
∃ x ≠ (0 : R), ¬ is_unit x :=
begin
have : ¬ _ := λ h, hf ⟨exists_pair_ne R, mul_comm, h⟩,
simp_rw is_unit_iff_exists_inv,
push_neg at ⊢ this,
obtain ⟨x, hx, not_unit⟩ := this,
exact ⟨x, hx, not_unit⟩
end
lemma not_is_field_iff_exists_ideal_bot_lt_and_lt_top [nontrivial R] :
¬ is_field R ↔ ∃ I : ideal R, ⊥ < I ∧ I < ⊤ :=
begin
split,
{ intro h,
obtain ⟨x, nz, nu⟩ := exists_not_is_unit_of_not_is_field h,
use ideal.span {x},
rw [bot_lt_iff_ne_bot, lt_top_iff_ne_top],
exact ⟨mt ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot.mp nz, mt ideal.span_singleton_eq_top.mp nu⟩ },
{ rintros ⟨I, bot_lt, lt_top⟩ hf,
obtain ⟨x, mem, ne_zero⟩ := submodule.exists_of_lt bot_lt,
rw submodule.mem_bot at ne_zero,
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hf.mul_inv_cancel ne_zero,
rw [lt_top_iff_ne_top, ne.def, ideal.eq_top_iff_one, ← hy] at lt_top,
exact lt_top (ideal.mul_mem_right _ mem), }
end
lemma not_is_field_iff_exists_prime [nontrivial R] :
¬ is_field R ↔ ∃ p : ideal R, p ≠ ⊥ ∧ p.is_prime :=
not_is_field_iff_exists_ideal_bot_lt_and_lt_top.trans
⟨λ ⟨I, bot_lt, lt_top⟩, let ⟨p, hp, le_p⟩ := I.exists_le_maximal (lt_top_iff_ne_top.mp lt_top) in
⟨p, bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mp (lt_of_lt_of_le bot_lt le_p), hp.is_prime⟩,
λ ⟨p, ne_bot, prime⟩, ⟨p, bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr ne_bot, lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr prime.1⟩⟩
end ring
namespace ideal
/-- Maximal ideals in a non-field are nontrivial. -/
variables {R : Type u} [comm_ring R] [nontrivial R]
lemma bot_lt_of_maximal (M : ideal R) [hm : M.is_maximal] (non_field : ¬ is_field R) : ⊥ < M :=
begin
rcases (ring.not_is_field_iff_exists_ideal_bot_lt_and_lt_top.1 non_field)
with ⟨I, Ibot, Itop⟩,
split, finish,
intro mle,
apply @irrefl _ (<) _ (⊤ : ideal R),
have : M = ⊥ := eq_bot_iff.mpr mle,
rw this at *,
rwa hm.2 I Ibot at Itop,
end
end ideal
/-- The set of non-invertible elements of a monoid. -/
def nonunits (α : Type u) [monoid α] : set α := { a | ¬is_unit a }
@[simp] theorem mem_nonunits_iff [comm_monoid α] : a ∈ nonunits α ↔ ¬ is_unit a := iff.rfl
theorem mul_mem_nonunits_right [comm_monoid α] :
b ∈ nonunits α → a * b ∈ nonunits α :=
mt is_unit_of_mul_is_unit_right
theorem mul_mem_nonunits_left [comm_monoid α] :
a ∈ nonunits α → a * b ∈ nonunits α :=
mt is_unit_of_mul_is_unit_left
theorem zero_mem_nonunits [semiring α] : 0 ∈ nonunits α ↔ (0:α) ≠ 1 :=
not_congr is_unit_zero_iff
@[simp] theorem one_not_mem_nonunits [monoid α] : (1:α) ∉ nonunits α :=
not_not_intro is_unit_one
theorem coe_subset_nonunits [comm_ring α] {I : ideal α} (h : I ≠ ⊤) :
(I : set α) ⊆ nonunits α :=
λ x hx hu, h $ I.eq_top_of_is_unit_mem hx hu
lemma exists_max_ideal_of_mem_nonunits [comm_ring α] (h : a ∈ nonunits α) :
∃ I : ideal α, I.is_maximal ∧ a ∈ I :=
begin
have : ideal.span ({a} : set α) ≠ ⊤,
{ intro H, rw ideal.span_singleton_eq_top at H, contradiction },
rcases ideal.exists_le_maximal _ this with ⟨I, Imax, H⟩,
use [I, Imax], apply H, apply ideal.subset_span, exact set.mem_singleton a
end
/-- A commutative ring is local if it has a unique maximal ideal. Note that
`local_ring` is a predicate. -/
class local_ring (α : Type u) [comm_ring α] extends nontrivial α : Prop :=
(is_local : ∀ (a : α), (is_unit a) ∨ (is_unit (1 - a)))
namespace local_ring
variables [comm_ring α] [local_ring α]
lemma is_unit_or_is_unit_one_sub_self (a : α) :
(is_unit a) ∨ (is_unit (1 - a)) :=
is_local a
lemma is_unit_of_mem_nonunits_one_sub_self (a : α) (h : (1 - a) ∈ nonunits α) :
is_unit a :=
or_iff_not_imp_right.1 (is_local a) h
lemma is_unit_one_sub_self_of_mem_nonunits (a : α) (h : a ∈ nonunits α) :
is_unit (1 - a) :=
or_iff_not_imp_left.1 (is_local a) h
lemma nonunits_add {x y} (hx : x ∈ nonunits α) (hy : y ∈ nonunits α) :
x + y ∈ nonunits α :=
begin
rintros ⟨u, hu⟩,
apply hy,
suffices : is_unit ((↑u⁻¹ : α) * y),
{ rcases this with ⟨s, hs⟩,
use u * s,
convert congr_arg (λ z, (u : α) * z) hs,
rw ← mul_assoc, simp },
rw show (↑u⁻¹ * y) = (1 - ↑u⁻¹ * x),
{ rw eq_sub_iff_add_eq,
replace hu := congr_arg (λ z, (↑u⁻¹ : α) * z) hu.symm,
simpa [mul_add, add_comm] using hu },
apply is_unit_one_sub_self_of_mem_nonunits,
exact mul_mem_nonunits_right hx
end
variable (α)
/-- The ideal of elements that are not units. -/
def maximal_ideal : ideal α :=
{ carrier := nonunits α,
zero_mem' := zero_mem_nonunits.2 $ zero_ne_one,
add_mem' := λ x y hx hy, nonunits_add hx hy,
smul_mem' := λ a x, mul_mem_nonunits_right }
instance maximal_ideal.is_maximal : (maximal_ideal α).is_maximal :=
begin
rw ideal.is_maximal_iff,
split,
{ intro h, apply h, exact is_unit_one },
{ intros I x hI hx H,
erw not_not at hx,
rcases hx with ⟨u,rfl⟩,
simpa using I.smul_mem ↑u⁻¹ H }
end
lemma maximal_ideal_unique :
∃! I : ideal α, I.is_maximal :=
⟨maximal_ideal α, maximal_ideal.is_maximal α,
λ I hI, hI.eq_of_le (maximal_ideal.is_maximal α).1 $
λ x hx, hI.1 ∘ I.eq_top_of_is_unit_mem hx⟩
variable {α}
lemma eq_maximal_ideal {I : ideal α} (hI : I.is_maximal) : I = maximal_ideal α :=
unique_of_exists_unique (maximal_ideal_unique α) hI $ maximal_ideal.is_maximal α
lemma le_maximal_ideal {J : ideal α} (hJ : J ≠ ⊤) : J ≤ maximal_ideal α :=
begin
rcases ideal.exists_le_maximal J hJ with ⟨M, hM1, hM2⟩,
rwa ←eq_maximal_ideal hM1
end
@[simp] lemma mem_maximal_ideal (x) :
x ∈ maximal_ideal α ↔ x ∈ nonunits α := iff.rfl
end local_ring
lemma local_of_nonunits_ideal [comm_ring α] (hnze : (0:α) ≠ 1)
(h : ∀ x y ∈ nonunits α, x + y ∈ nonunits α) : local_ring α :=
{ exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, hnze⟩,
is_local := λ x, or_iff_not_imp_left.mpr $ λ hx,
begin
by_contra H,
apply h _ _ hx H,
simp [-sub_eq_add_neg, add_sub_cancel'_right]
end }
lemma local_of_unique_max_ideal [comm_ring α] (h : ∃! I : ideal α, I.is_maximal) :
local_ring α :=
local_of_nonunits_ideal
(let ⟨I, Imax, _⟩ := h in (λ (H : 0 = 1), Imax.1 $ I.eq_top_iff_one.2 $ H ▸ I.zero_mem))
$ λ x y hx hy H,
let ⟨I, Imax, Iuniq⟩ := h in
let ⟨Ix, Ixmax, Hx⟩ := exists_max_ideal_of_mem_nonunits hx in
let ⟨Iy, Iymax, Hy⟩ := exists_max_ideal_of_mem_nonunits hy in
have xmemI : x ∈ I, from ((Iuniq Ix Ixmax) ▸ Hx),
have ymemI : y ∈ I, from ((Iuniq Iy Iymax) ▸ Hy),
Imax.1 $ I.eq_top_of_is_unit_mem (I.add_mem xmemI ymemI) H
lemma local_of_unique_nonzero_prime (R : Type u) [comm_ring R]
(h : ∃! P : ideal R, P ≠ ⊥ ∧ ideal.is_prime P) : local_ring R :=
local_of_unique_max_ideal begin
rcases h with ⟨P, ⟨hPnonzero, hPnot_top, _⟩, hPunique⟩,
refine ⟨P, ⟨hPnot_top, _⟩, λ M hM, hPunique _ ⟨_, ideal.is_maximal.is_prime hM⟩⟩,
{ refine ideal.maximal_of_no_maximal (λ M hPM hM, ne_of_lt hPM _),
exact (hPunique _ ⟨ne_bot_of_gt hPM, ideal.is_maximal.is_prime hM⟩).symm },
{ rintro rfl,
exact hPnot_top (hM.2 P (bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.2 hPnonzero)) },
end
lemma local_of_surjective {A B : Type*} [comm_ring A] [local_ring A] [comm_ring B] [nontrivial B]
(f : A →+* B) (hf : function.surjective f) :
local_ring B :=
{ is_local :=
begin
intros b,
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := hf b,
apply (local_ring.is_unit_or_is_unit_one_sub_self a).imp f.is_unit_map _,
rw [← f.map_one, ← f.map_sub],
apply f.is_unit_map,
end,
.. ‹nontrivial B› }
/-- A local ring homomorphism is a homomorphism between local rings
such that the image of the maximal ideal of the source is contained within
the maximal ideal of the target. -/
class is_local_ring_hom [semiring α] [semiring β] (f : α →+* β) : Prop :=
(map_nonunit : ∀ a, is_unit (f a) → is_unit a)
instance is_local_ring_hom_id (A : Type*) [semiring A] : is_local_ring_hom (ring_hom.id A) :=
{ map_nonunit := λ a, id }
@[simp] lemma is_unit_map_iff {A B : Type*} [semiring A] [semiring B] (f : A →+* B)
[is_local_ring_hom f] (a) :
is_unit (f a) ↔ is_unit a :=
⟨is_local_ring_hom.map_nonunit a, f.is_unit_map⟩
instance is_local_ring_hom_comp {A B C : Type*} [semiring A] [semiring B] [semiring C]
(g : B →+* C) (f : A →+* B) [is_local_ring_hom g] [is_local_ring_hom f] :
is_local_ring_hom (g.comp f) :=
{ map_nonunit := λ a, is_local_ring_hom.map_nonunit a ∘ is_local_ring_hom.map_nonunit (f a) }
@[simp] lemma is_unit_of_map_unit [semiring α] [semiring β] (f : α →+* β) [is_local_ring_hom f]
(a) (h : is_unit (f a)) : is_unit a :=
is_local_ring_hom.map_nonunit a h
theorem of_irreducible_map [semiring α] [semiring β] (f : α →+* β) [h : is_local_ring_hom f] {x : α}
(hfx : irreducible (f x)) : irreducible x :=
⟨λ h, hfx.1 $ is_unit.map f.to_monoid_hom h, λ p q hx, let ⟨H⟩ := h in
or.imp (H p) (H q) $ hfx.2 _ _ $ f.map_mul p q ▸ congr_arg f hx⟩
section
open local_ring
variables [comm_ring α] [local_ring α] [comm_ring β] [local_ring β]
variables (f : α →+* β) [is_local_ring_hom f]
lemma map_nonunit (a) (h : a ∈ maximal_ideal α) : f a ∈ maximal_ideal β :=
λ H, h $ is_unit_of_map_unit f a H
end
namespace local_ring
variables [comm_ring α] [local_ring α] [comm_ring β] [local_ring β]
variable (α)
/-- The residue field of a local ring is the quotient of the ring by its maximal ideal. -/
def residue_field := (maximal_ideal α).quotient
noncomputable instance residue_field.field : field (residue_field α) :=
ideal.quotient.field (maximal_ideal α)
noncomputable instance : inhabited (residue_field α) := ⟨37⟩
/-- The quotient map from a local ring to its residue field. -/
def residue : α →+* (residue_field α) :=
ideal.quotient.mk _
namespace residue_field
variables {α β}
/-- The map on residue fields induced by a local homomorphism between local rings -/
noncomputable def map (f : α →+* β) [is_local_ring_hom f] :
residue_field α →+* residue_field β :=
ideal.quotient.lift (maximal_ideal α) ((ideal.quotient.mk _).comp f) $
λ a ha,
begin
erw ideal.quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem,
exact map_nonunit f a ha
end
end residue_field
end local_ring
namespace field
variables [field α]
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance : local_ring α :=
{ is_local := λ a,
if h : a = 0
then or.inr (by rw [h, sub_zero]; exact is_unit_one)
else or.inl $ is_unit_of_mul_eq_one a a⁻¹ $ div_self h }
end field
|
7b92eb8abae96272c96f49ebe585c972869fd4c3 | bdb33f8b7ea65f7705fc342a178508e2722eb851 | /data/num/lemmas.lean | 113604ae8f631681e6fd65e86062359243b13163 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | rwbarton/mathlib | 939ae09bf8d6eb1331fc2f7e067d39567e10e33d | c13c5ea701bb1eec057e0a242d9f480a079105e9 | refs/heads/master | 1,584,015,335,862 | 1,524,142,167,000 | 1,524,142,167,000 | 130,614,171 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,548,902,667,000 | 1,524,437,371,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 37,513 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Mario Carneiro
Properties of the binary representation of integers.
-/
import data.num.basic data.num.bitwise algebra.order
tactic.interactive data.int.basic
namespace pos_num
variables {α : Type*}
@[simp] theorem cast_one [has_zero α] [has_one α] [has_add α] : ((1 : pos_num) : α) = 1 := rfl theorem one_add (n : pos_num) : 1 + n = succ n := by cases n; refl
@[simp] theorem cast_bit0 [has_zero α] [has_one α] [has_add α] (n : pos_num) : (n.bit0 : α) = _root_.bit0 n := rfl
@[simp] theorem cast_bit1 [has_zero α] [has_one α] [has_add α] (n : pos_num) : (n.bit1 : α) = _root_.bit1 n := rfl
@[simp] theorem cast_to_nat [add_monoid α] [has_one α] : ∀ n : pos_num, ((n : ℕ) : α) = n
| 1 := nat.cast_one
| (bit0 p) := (nat.cast_bit0 _).trans $ congr_arg _root_.bit0 p.cast_to_nat
| (bit1 p) := (nat.cast_bit1 _).trans $ congr_arg _root_.bit1 p.cast_to_nat
@[simp] theorem cast_to_int [add_group α] [has_one α] (n : pos_num) : ((n : ℤ) : α) = n :=
by rw [← cast_to_nat, int.nat_cast_eq_coe_nat, int.cast_coe_nat, cast_to_nat]
theorem succ_to_nat : ∀ n, (succ n : ℕ) = n + 1
| 1 := rfl
| (bit0 p) := rfl
| (bit1 p) := (congr_arg _root_.bit0 (succ_to_nat p)).trans $
show ↑p + 1 + ↑p + 1 = ↑p + ↑p + 1 + 1, by simp
theorem add_one (n : pos_num) : n + 1 = succ n := by cases n; refl
@[simp] theorem add_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m + n : pos_num) : ℕ) = m + n
| 1 b := by rw [one_add b, succ_to_nat, add_comm]; refl
| a 1 := by rw [add_one a, succ_to_nat]; refl
| (bit0 a) (bit0 b) := (congr_arg _root_.bit0 (add_to_nat a b)).trans $
show ((a + b) + (a + b) : ℕ) = (a + a) + (b + b), by simp
| (bit0 a) (bit1 b) := (congr_arg _root_.bit1 (add_to_nat a b)).trans $
show ((a + b) + (a + b) + 1 : ℕ) = (a + a) + (b + b + 1), by simp
| (bit1 a) (bit0 b) := (congr_arg _root_.bit1 (add_to_nat a b)).trans $
show ((a + b) + (a + b) + 1 : ℕ) = (a + a + 1) + (b + b), by simp
| (bit1 a) (bit1 b) :=
show (succ (a + b) + succ (a + b) : ℕ) = (a + a + 1) + (b + b + 1),
by rw [succ_to_nat, add_to_nat]; simp
theorem add_succ : ∀ (m n : pos_num), m + succ n = succ (m + n)
| 1 b := by simp [one_add]
| (bit0 a) 1 := congr_arg bit0 (add_one a)
| (bit1 a) 1 := congr_arg bit1 (add_one a)
| (bit0 a) (bit0 b) := rfl
| (bit0 a) (bit1 b) := congr_arg bit0 (add_succ a b)
| (bit1 a) (bit0 b) := rfl
| (bit1 a) (bit1 b) := congr_arg bit1 (add_succ a b)
theorem bit0_of_bit0 : Π n, _root_.bit0 n = bit0 n
| 1 := rfl
| (bit0 p) := congr_arg bit0 (bit0_of_bit0 p)
| (bit1 p) := show bit0 (succ (_root_.bit0 p)) = _, by rw bit0_of_bit0; refl
theorem bit1_of_bit1 (n : pos_num) : _root_.bit1 n = bit1 n :=
show _root_.bit0 n + 1 = bit1 n, by rw [add_one, bit0_of_bit0]; refl
@[simp] theorem mul_to_nat (m) : ∀ n, ((m * n : pos_num) : ℕ) = m * n
| 1 := (mul_one _).symm
| (bit0 p) := show (↑(m * p) + ↑(m * p) : ℕ) = ↑m * (p + p), by rw [mul_to_nat, left_distrib]
| (bit1 p) := (add_to_nat (bit0 (m * p)) m).trans $
show (↑(m * p) + ↑(m * p) + ↑m : ℕ) = ↑m * (p + p) + m, by rw [mul_to_nat, left_distrib]
theorem to_nat_pos : ∀ n : pos_num, (n : ℕ) > 0
| 1 := zero_lt_one
| (bit0 p) := let h := to_nat_pos p in add_pos h h
| (bit1 p) := nat.succ_pos _
theorem cmp_to_nat_lemma {m n : pos_num} : (m:ℕ) < n → (bit1 m : ℕ) < bit0 n :=
show (m:ℕ) < n → (m + m + 1 + 1 : ℕ) ≤ n + n,
by intro h; rw [nat.add_right_comm m m 1, add_assoc]; exact add_le_add h h
theorem cmp_swap (m) : ∀n, (cmp m n).swap = cmp n m :=
by induction m with m IH m IH; intro n;
cases n with n n; try {unfold cmp}; try {refl}; rw ←IH; cases cmp m n; refl
theorem cmp_to_nat : ∀ (m n), (ordering.cases_on (cmp m n) ((m:ℕ) < n) (m = n) ((m:ℕ) > n) : Prop)
| 1 1 := rfl
| (bit0 a) 1 := let h : (1:ℕ) ≤ a := to_nat_pos a in add_le_add h h
| (bit1 a) 1 := nat.succ_lt_succ $ to_nat_pos $ bit0 a
| 1 (bit0 b) := let h : (1:ℕ) ≤ b := to_nat_pos b in add_le_add h h
| 1 (bit1 b) := nat.succ_lt_succ $ to_nat_pos $ bit0 b
| (bit0 a) (bit0 b) := begin
have := cmp_to_nat a b, revert this, cases cmp a b; dsimp; intro,
{ exact add_lt_add this this },
{ rw this },
{ exact add_lt_add this this }
end
| (bit0 a) (bit1 b) := begin dsimp [cmp],
have := cmp_to_nat a b, revert this, cases cmp a b; dsimp; intro,
{ exact nat.le_succ_of_le (add_lt_add this this) },
{ rw this, apply nat.lt_succ_self },
{ exact cmp_to_nat_lemma this }
end
| (bit1 a) (bit0 b) := begin dsimp [cmp],
have := cmp_to_nat a b, revert this, cases cmp a b; dsimp; intro,
{ exact cmp_to_nat_lemma this },
{ rw this, apply nat.lt_succ_self },
{ exact nat.le_succ_of_le (add_lt_add this this) },
end
| (bit1 a) (bit1 b) := begin
have := cmp_to_nat a b, revert this, cases cmp a b; dsimp; intro,
{ exact nat.succ_lt_succ (add_lt_add this this) },
{ rw this },
{ exact nat.succ_lt_succ (add_lt_add this this) }
end
@[simp] theorem lt_to_nat {m n : pos_num} : (m:ℕ) < n ↔ m < n :=
show (m:ℕ) < n ↔ cmp m n = ordering.lt, from
match cmp m n, cmp_to_nat m n with
| ordering.lt, h := by simp at h; simp [h]
| ordering.eq, h := by simp at h; simp [h, lt_irrefl]; exact dec_trivial
| ordering.gt, h := by simp [not_lt_of_gt h]; exact dec_trivial
end
@[simp] theorem le_to_nat {m n : pos_num} : (m:ℕ) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n :=
by rw ← not_lt; exact not_congr lt_to_nat
end pos_num
namespace num
variables {α : Type*}
open pos_num
theorem add_zero (n : num) : n + 0 = n := by cases n; refl
theorem zero_add (n : num) : 0 + n = n := by cases n; refl
theorem add_one : ∀ n : num, n + 1 = succ n
| 0 := rfl
| (pos p) := by cases p; refl
theorem add_succ : ∀ (m n : num), m + succ n = succ (m + n)
| 0 n := by simp [zero_add]
| (pos p) 0 := show pos (p + 1) = succ (pos p + 0),
by rw [pos_num.add_one, add_zero]; refl
| (pos p) (pos q) := congr_arg pos (pos_num.add_succ _ _)
@[simp] theorem add_of_nat (m) : ∀ n, ((m + n : ℕ) : num) = m + n
| 0 := (add_zero _).symm
| (n+1) := show ((m + n : ℕ) + 1 : num) = m + (↑ n + 1),
by rw [add_one, add_one, add_succ, add_of_nat]
theorem bit0_of_bit0 : ∀ n : num, bit0 n = n.bit0
| 0 := rfl
| (pos p) := congr_arg pos p.bit0_of_bit0
theorem bit1_of_bit1 : ∀ n : num, bit1 n = n.bit1
| 0 := rfl
| (pos p) := congr_arg pos p.bit1_of_bit1
@[simp] theorem cast_zero [has_zero α] [has_one α] [has_add α] :
((0 : num) : α) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem cast_one [has_zero α] [has_one α] [has_add α] :
((1 : num) : α) = 1 := rfl
theorem succ'_to_nat : ∀ n, (succ' n : ℕ) = n + 1
| 0 := (_root_.zero_add _).symm
| (pos p) := pos_num.succ_to_nat _
theorem succ_to_nat (n) : (succ n : ℕ) = n + 1 := succ'_to_nat n
@[simp] theorem cast_to_nat [add_monoid α] [has_one α] : ∀ n : num, ((n : ℕ) : α) = n
| 0 := nat.cast_zero
| (pos p) := p.cast_to_nat
@[simp] theorem cast_to_int [add_group α] [has_one α] (n : num) : ((n : ℤ) : α) = n :=
by rw [← cast_to_nat, int.nat_cast_eq_coe_nat, int.cast_coe_nat, cast_to_nat]
@[simp] theorem to_of_nat : Π (n : ℕ), ((n : num) : ℕ) = n
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := by rw [nat.cast_add_one, add_one, succ_to_nat, to_of_nat]
theorem of_nat_inj {m n : ℕ} : (m : num) = n ↔ m = n :=
⟨λ h, function.injective_of_left_inverse to_of_nat h, congr_arg _⟩
@[simp] theorem add_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m + n : num) : ℕ) = m + n
| 0 0 := rfl
| 0 (pos q) := (_root_.zero_add _).symm
| (pos p) 0 := rfl
| (pos p) (pos q) := pos_num.add_to_nat _ _
@[simp] theorem mul_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m * n : num) : ℕ) = m * n
| 0 0 := rfl
| 0 (pos q) := (zero_mul _).symm
| (pos p) 0 := rfl
| (pos p) (pos q) := pos_num.mul_to_nat _ _
theorem cmp_to_nat : ∀ (m n), (ordering.cases_on (cmp m n) ((m:ℕ) < n) (m = n) ((m:ℕ) > n) : Prop)
| 0 0 := rfl
| 0 (pos b) := to_nat_pos _
| (pos a) 0 := to_nat_pos _
| (pos a) (pos b) :=
by { have := pos_num.cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; dsimp [cmp];
cases pos_num.cmp a b, exacts [id, congr_arg pos, id] }
@[simp] theorem lt_to_nat {m n : num} : (m:ℕ) < n ↔ m < n :=
show (m:ℕ) < n ↔ cmp m n = ordering.lt, from
match cmp m n, cmp_to_nat m n with
| ordering.lt, h := by simp at h; simp [h]
| ordering.eq, h := by simp at h; simp [h, lt_irrefl]; exact dec_trivial
| ordering.gt, h := by simp [not_lt_of_gt h]; exact dec_trivial
end
@[simp] theorem le_to_nat {m n : num} : (m:ℕ) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n :=
by rw ← not_lt; exact not_congr lt_to_nat
end num
namespace pos_num
@[simp] theorem of_to_nat : Π (n : pos_num), ((n : ℕ) : num) = num.pos n
| 1 := rfl
| (bit0 p) :=
show ↑(p + p : ℕ) = num.pos p.bit0,
by rw [num.add_of_nat, of_to_nat];
exact congr_arg num.pos p.bit0_of_bit0
| (bit1 p) :=
show ((p + p : ℕ) : num) + 1 = num.pos p.bit1,
by rw [num.add_of_nat, of_to_nat];
exact congr_arg num.pos p.bit1_of_bit1
end pos_num
namespace num
@[simp] theorem of_to_nat : Π (n : num), ((n : ℕ) : num) = n
| 0 := rfl
| (pos p) := p.of_to_nat
theorem to_nat_inj {m n : num} : (m : ℕ) = n ↔ m = n :=
⟨λ h, function.injective_of_left_inverse of_to_nat h, congr_arg _⟩
meta def transfer_rw : tactic unit :=
`[repeat {rw ← to_nat_inj <|> rw ← lt_to_nat <|> rw ← le_to_nat},
repeat {rw add_to_nat <|> rw mul_to_nat <|> rw cast_one <|> rw cast_zero}]
meta def transfer : tactic unit := `[intros, transfer_rw, try {simp}]
instance : comm_semiring num :=
by refine {
add := (+),
zero := 0,
zero_add := zero_add,
add_zero := add_zero,
mul := (*),
one := 1, .. }; try {transfer}; simp [mul_add, mul_left_comm, mul_comm]
instance : ordered_cancel_comm_monoid num :=
{ add_left_cancel := by {intros a b c, transfer_rw, apply add_left_cancel},
add_right_cancel := by {intros a b c, transfer_rw, apply add_right_cancel},
lt := (<),
lt_iff_le_not_le := by {intros a b, transfer_rw, apply lt_iff_le_not_le},
le := (≤),
le_refl := by transfer,
le_trans := by {intros a b c, transfer_rw, apply le_trans},
le_antisymm := by {intros a b, transfer_rw, apply le_antisymm},
add_le_add_left := by {intros a b h c, revert h, transfer_rw, exact λ h, add_le_add_left h c},
le_of_add_le_add_left := by {intros a b c, transfer_rw, apply le_of_add_le_add_left},
..num.comm_semiring }
instance : decidable_linear_ordered_semiring num :=
{ le_total := by {intros a b, transfer_rw, apply le_total},
zero_lt_one := dec_trivial,
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left := by {intros a b c, transfer_rw, apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left},
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right := by {intros a b c, transfer_rw, apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right},
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left := by {intros a b c, transfer_rw, apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left},
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right := by {intros a b c, transfer_rw, apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right},
decidable_lt := num.decidable_lt,
decidable_le := num.decidable_le,
decidable_eq := num.decidable_eq,
..num.comm_semiring, ..num.ordered_cancel_comm_monoid }
end num
namespace pos_num
variables {α : Type*}
open num
theorem to_nat_inj {m n : pos_num} : (m : ℕ) = n ↔ m = n :=
⟨λ h, num.pos.inj $ by rw [← pos_num.of_to_nat, ← pos_num.of_to_nat, h],
congr_arg _⟩
theorem pred'_to_nat : ∀ n, (pred' n : ℕ) = nat.pred n
| 1 := rfl
| (bit0 n) :=
have nat.succ ↑(pred' n) = ↑n,
by rw [pred'_to_nat n, nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (to_nat_pos n)],
match pred' n, this : ∀ k : num, nat.succ ↑k = ↑n →
↑(num.cases_on k 1 bit1 : pos_num) = nat.pred (_root_.bit0 n) with
| 0, (h : ((1:num):ℕ) = n) := by rw ← to_nat_inj.1 h; refl
| num.pos p, (h : nat.succ ↑p = n) :=
by rw ← h; exact (nat.succ_add p p).symm
end
| (bit1 n) := rfl
@[simp] theorem pred'_succ' (n) : pred' (succ' n) = n :=
num.to_nat_inj.1 $ by rw [pred'_to_nat, succ'_to_nat,
nat.add_one, nat.pred_succ]
@[simp] theorem succ'_pred' (n) : succ' (pred' n) = n :=
to_nat_inj.1 $ by rw [succ'_to_nat, pred'_to_nat,
nat.add_one, nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (to_nat_pos _)]
theorem size_to_nat : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = nat.size n
| 1 := nat.size_one.symm
| (bit0 n) := by rw [size, succ_to_nat, size_to_nat, cast_bit0,
nat.size_bit0 $ ne_of_gt $ to_nat_pos n]
| (bit1 n) := by rw [size, succ_to_nat, size_to_nat, cast_bit1,
nat.size_bit1]
meta def transfer_rw : tactic unit :=
`[repeat {rw ← to_nat_inj <|> rw ← lt_to_nat <|> rw ← le_to_nat},
repeat {rw add_to_nat <|> rw mul_to_nat <|> rw cast_one <|> rw cast_zero}]
meta def transfer : tactic unit := `[intros, transfer_rw, try {simp [mul_comm, mul_left_comm]}]
instance : add_comm_semigroup pos_num :=
by refine {add := (+), ..}; transfer
instance : comm_monoid pos_num :=
by refine {mul := (*), one := 1, ..}; transfer
instance : distrib pos_num :=
by refine {add := (+), mul := (*), ..}; {transfer, simp [mul_add, mul_comm]}
instance : decidable_linear_order pos_num :=
{ lt := (<),
lt_iff_le_not_le := by {intros a b, transfer_rw, apply lt_iff_le_not_le},
le := (≤),
le_refl := by transfer,
le_trans := by {intros a b c, transfer_rw, apply le_trans},
le_antisymm := by {intros a b, transfer_rw, apply le_antisymm},
le_total := by {intros a b, transfer_rw, apply le_total},
decidable_lt := by apply_instance,
decidable_le := by apply_instance,
decidable_eq := by apply_instance }
@[simp] theorem cast_to_num (n : pos_num) : ↑n = num.pos n :=
by rw [← cast_to_nat, ← of_to_nat n]
theorem bit_to_nat (b n) : (bit b n : ℕ) = nat.bit b n :=
by cases b; refl
@[simp] theorem cast_add [add_monoid α] [has_one α] (m n) : ((m + n : pos_num) : α) = m + n :=
by rw [← cast_to_nat, add_to_nat, nat.cast_add, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
@[simp] theorem cast_succ [add_monoid α] [has_one α] (n : pos_num) : (succ n : α) = n + 1 :=
by rw [← add_one, cast_add, cast_one]
theorem one_le_cast [linear_ordered_semiring α] (n : pos_num) : (1 : α) ≤ n :=
by rw [← cast_to_nat, ← nat.cast_one, nat.cast_le]; apply to_nat_pos
theorem cast_pos [linear_ordered_semiring α] (n : pos_num) : (n : α) > 0 :=
lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (one_le_cast n)
@[simp] theorem cast_mul [semiring α] (m n) : ((m * n : pos_num) : α) = m * n :=
by rw [← cast_to_nat, mul_to_nat, nat.cast_mul, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
theorem cmp_eq (m n) : cmp m n = ordering.eq ↔ m = n :=
begin
have := cmp_to_nat m n,
cases cmp m n; simp at this ⊢; try {exact this};
{ simp [show m ≠ n, from λ e, by rw e at this; exact lt_irrefl _ this] }
end
@[simp] theorem cast_lt [linear_ordered_semiring α] {m n : pos_num} : (m:α) < n ↔ m < n :=
by rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, nat.cast_lt, lt_to_nat]
@[simp] theorem cast_le [linear_ordered_semiring α] {m n : pos_num} : (m:α) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n :=
by rw ← not_lt; exact not_congr cast_lt
@[simp] theorem cast_inj [linear_ordered_semiring α] {m n : pos_num} : (m:α) = n ↔ m = n :=
by rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, nat.cast_inj, to_nat_inj]
end pos_num
namespace num
variables {α : Type*}
open pos_num
theorem bit_to_nat (b n) : (bit b n : ℕ) = nat.bit b n :=
by cases b; cases n; refl
theorem cast_succ' [add_monoid α] [has_one α] (n) : (succ' n : α) = n + 1 :=
by rw [← pos_num.cast_to_nat, succ'_to_nat, nat.cast_add_one, cast_to_nat]
theorem cast_succ [add_monoid α] [has_one α] (n) : (succ n : α) = n + 1 := cast_succ' n
@[simp] theorem cast_add [semiring α] (m n) : ((m + n : num) : α) = m + n :=
by rw [← cast_to_nat, add_to_nat, nat.cast_add, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
@[simp] theorem cast_mul [semiring α] : ∀ m n, ((m * n : num) : α) = m * n
| 0 0 := (zero_mul _).symm
| 0 (pos q) := (zero_mul _).symm
| (pos p) 0 := (mul_zero _).symm
| (pos p) (pos q) := pos_num.cast_mul _ _
theorem zneg_to_znum (n : num) : -n.to_znum = n.to_znum_neg := by cases n; refl
theorem zneg_to_znum_neg (n : num) : -n.to_znum_neg = n.to_znum := by cases n; refl
@[simp] theorem cast_to_znum [has_zero α] [has_one α] [has_add α] [has_neg α] :
∀ n : num, (n.to_znum : α) = n
| 0 := rfl
| (num.pos p) := rfl
@[simp] theorem cast_to_znum_neg [add_group α] [has_one α] :
∀ n : num, (n.to_znum_neg : α) = -n
| 0 := neg_zero.symm
| (num.pos p) := rfl
@[simp] theorem add_to_znum (m n : num) : num.to_znum (m + n) = m.to_znum + n.to_znum :=
by cases m; cases n; refl
end num
namespace pos_num
open num
theorem pred_to_nat {n : pos_num} (h : n > 1) : (pred n : ℕ) = nat.pred n :=
begin
unfold pred,
have := pred'_to_nat n,
cases e : pred' n,
{ have : (1:ℕ) ≤ nat.pred n :=
nat.pred_le_pred ((@cast_lt ℕ _ _ _).2 h),
rw [← pred'_to_nat, e] at this,
exact absurd this dec_trivial },
{ rw [← pred'_to_nat, e], refl }
end
theorem sub'_one (a : pos_num) : sub' a 1 = (pred' a).to_znum :=
by cases a; refl
theorem one_sub' (a : pos_num) : sub' 1 a = (pred' a).to_znum_neg :=
by cases a; refl
theorem lt_iff_cmp {m n} : m < n ↔ cmp m n = ordering.lt := iff.rfl
theorem le_iff_cmp {m n} : m ≤ n ↔ cmp m n ≠ ordering.gt :=
not_congr $ lt_iff_cmp.trans $
by rw ← cmp_swap; cases cmp m n; exact dec_trivial
end pos_num
namespace num
variables {α : Type*}
open pos_num
theorem pred_to_nat : ∀ (n : num), (pred n : ℕ) = nat.pred n
| 0 := rfl
| (pos p) := by rw [pred, pos_num.pred'_to_nat]; refl
theorem ppred_to_nat : ∀ (n : num), coe <$> ppred n = nat.ppred n
| 0 := rfl
| (pos p) := by rw [ppred, option.map_some, nat.ppred_eq_some.2];
rw [pos_num.pred'_to_nat, nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (pos_num.to_nat_pos _)]; refl
theorem cmp_swap (m n) : (cmp m n).swap = cmp n m :=
by cases m; cases n; try {unfold cmp}; try {refl}; apply pos_num.cmp_swap
theorem cmp_eq (m n) : cmp m n = ordering.eq ↔ m = n :=
begin
have := cmp_to_nat m n,
cases cmp m n; simp at this ⊢; try {exact this};
{ simp [show m ≠ n, from λ e, by rw e at this; exact lt_irrefl _ this] }
end
@[simp] theorem cast_lt [linear_ordered_semiring α] {m n : num} : (m:α) < n ↔ m < n :=
by rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, nat.cast_lt, lt_to_nat]
@[simp] theorem cast_le [linear_ordered_semiring α] {m n : num} : (m:α) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n :=
by rw ← not_lt; exact not_congr cast_lt
@[simp] theorem cast_inj [linear_ordered_semiring α] {m n : num} : (m:α) = n ↔ m = n :=
by rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, nat.cast_inj, to_nat_inj]
theorem lt_iff_cmp {m n} : m < n ↔ cmp m n = ordering.lt := iff.rfl
theorem le_iff_cmp {m n} : m ≤ n ↔ cmp m n ≠ ordering.gt :=
not_congr $ lt_iff_cmp.trans $
by rw ← cmp_swap; cases cmp m n; exact dec_trivial
theorem bitwise_to_nat {f : num → num → num} {g : bool → bool → bool}
(p : pos_num → pos_num → num)
(gff : g ff ff = ff)
(f00 : f 0 0 = 0)
(f0n : ∀ n, f 0 (pos n) = cond (g ff tt) (pos n) 0)
(fn0 : ∀ n, f (pos n) 0 = cond (g tt ff) (pos n) 0)
(fnn : ∀ m n, f (pos m) (pos n) = p m n)
(p11 : p 1 1 = cond (g tt tt) 1 0)
(p1b : ∀ b n, p 1 (pos_num.bit b n) = bit (g tt b) (cond (g ff tt) (pos n) 0))
(pb1 : ∀ a m, p (pos_num.bit a m) 1 = bit (g a tt) (cond (g tt ff) (pos m) 0))
(pbb : ∀ a b m n, p (pos_num.bit a m) (pos_num.bit b n) = bit (g a b) (p m n))
: ∀ m n : num, (f m n : ℕ) = nat.bitwise g m n :=
begin
intros, cases m with m; cases n with n;
try { change zero with 0 };
try { change ((0:num):ℕ) with 0 },
{ rw [f00, nat.bitwise_zero]; refl },
{ unfold nat.bitwise, rw [f0n, nat.binary_rec_zero],
cases g ff tt; refl },
{ unfold nat.bitwise,
generalize h : (pos m : ℕ) = m', revert h,
apply nat.bit_cases_on m' _, intros b m' h,
rw [fn0, nat.binary_rec_eq, nat.binary_rec_zero, ←h],
cases g tt ff; refl,
apply nat.bitwise_bit_aux gff },
{ rw fnn,
have : ∀b (n : pos_num), (cond b ↑n 0 : ℕ) = ↑(cond b (pos n) 0 : num) :=
by intros; cases b; refl,
induction m with m IH m IH generalizing n; cases n with n n,
any_goals { change one with 1 },
any_goals { change pos 1 with 1 },
any_goals { change pos_num.bit0 with pos_num.bit ff },
any_goals { change pos_num.bit1 with pos_num.bit tt },
any_goals { change ((1:num):ℕ) with nat.bit tt 0 },
all_goals {
repeat {
rw show ∀ b n, (pos (pos_num.bit b n) : ℕ) = nat.bit b ↑n,
by intros; cases b; refl },
rw nat.bitwise_bit },
any_goals { assumption },
any_goals { rw [nat.bitwise_zero, p11], cases g tt tt; refl },
any_goals { rw [nat.bitwise_zero_left, this, ← bit_to_nat, p1b] },
any_goals { rw [nat.bitwise_zero_right _ gff, this, ← bit_to_nat, pb1] },
all_goals { rw [← show ∀ n, ↑(p m n) = nat.bitwise g ↑m ↑n, from IH],
rw [← bit_to_nat, pbb] } }
end
@[simp] theorem lor_to_nat : ∀ m n, (lor m n : ℕ) = nat.lor m n :=
by apply bitwise_to_nat (λx y, pos (pos_num.lor x y)); intros; try {cases a}; try {cases b}; refl
@[simp] theorem land_to_nat : ∀ m n, (land m n : ℕ) = nat.land m n :=
by apply bitwise_to_nat pos_num.land; intros; try {cases a}; try {cases b}; refl
@[simp] theorem ldiff_to_nat : ∀ m n, (ldiff m n : ℕ) = nat.ldiff m n :=
by apply bitwise_to_nat pos_num.ldiff; intros; try {cases a}; try {cases b}; refl
@[simp] theorem lxor_to_nat : ∀ m n, (lxor m n : ℕ) = nat.lxor m n :=
by apply bitwise_to_nat pos_num.lxor; intros; try {cases a}; try {cases b}; refl
@[simp] theorem shiftl_to_nat (m n) : (shiftl m n : ℕ) = nat.shiftl m n :=
begin
cases m; dunfold shiftl, {symmetry, apply nat.zero_shiftl},
induction n with n IH, {refl},
simp [pos_num.shiftl, nat.shiftl_succ], rw ←IH, refl
end
@[simp] theorem shiftr_to_nat (m n) : (shiftr m n : ℕ) = nat.shiftr m n :=
begin
cases m with m; dunfold shiftr, {symmetry, apply nat.zero_shiftr},
induction n with n IH generalizing m, {cases m; refl},
cases m with m m; dunfold pos_num.shiftr,
{ rw [nat.shiftr_eq_div_pow], symmetry, apply nat.div_eq_of_lt,
exact @nat.pow_lt_pow_of_lt_right 2 dec_trivial 0 (n+1) (nat.succ_pos _) },
{ transitivity, apply IH,
change nat.shiftr m n = nat.shiftr (bit1 m) (n+1),
rw [add_comm n 1, nat.shiftr_add],
apply congr_arg (λx, nat.shiftr x n), unfold nat.shiftr,
change (bit1 ↑m : ℕ) with nat.bit tt m,
rw nat.div2_bit },
{ transitivity, apply IH,
change nat.shiftr m n = nat.shiftr (bit0 m) (n + 1),
rw [add_comm n 1, nat.shiftr_add],
apply congr_arg (λx, nat.shiftr x n), unfold nat.shiftr,
change (bit0 ↑m : ℕ) with nat.bit ff m,
rw nat.div2_bit }
end
@[simp] theorem test_bit_to_nat (m n) : test_bit m n = nat.test_bit m n :=
begin
cases m with m; unfold test_bit nat.test_bit,
{ change (zero : nat) with 0, rw nat.zero_shiftr, refl },
induction n with n IH generalizing m;
cases m; dunfold pos_num.test_bit, {refl},
{ exact (nat.bodd_bit _ _).symm },
{ exact (nat.bodd_bit _ _).symm },
{ change ff = nat.bodd (nat.shiftr 1 (n + 1)),
rw [add_comm, nat.shiftr_add], change nat.shiftr 1 1 with 0,
rw nat.zero_shiftr; refl },
{ change pos_num.test_bit m n = nat.bodd (nat.shiftr (nat.bit tt m) (n + 1)),
rw [add_comm, nat.shiftr_add], unfold nat.shiftr,
rw nat.div2_bit, apply IH },
{ change pos_num.test_bit m n = nat.bodd (nat.shiftr (nat.bit ff m) (n + 1)),
rw [add_comm, nat.shiftr_add], unfold nat.shiftr,
rw nat.div2_bit, apply IH },
end
end num
namespace znum
variables {α : Type*}
open pos_num
@[simp] theorem cast_zero [has_zero α] [has_one α] [has_add α] [has_neg α] :
((0 : znum) : α) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem cast_one [has_zero α] [has_one α] [has_add α] [has_neg α] :
((1 : znum) : α) = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem cast_pos [has_zero α] [has_one α] [has_add α] [has_neg α]
(n : pos_num) : (pos n : α) = n := rfl
@[simp] theorem cast_neg [has_zero α] [has_one α] [has_add α] [has_neg α]
(n : pos_num) : (neg n : α) = -n := rfl
@[simp] theorem cast_zneg [add_group α] [has_one α] : ∀ n, ((-n : znum) : α) = -n
| 0 := neg_zero.symm
| (pos p) := rfl
| (neg p) := (neg_neg _).symm
theorem neg_zero : (-0 : znum) = 0 := rfl
theorem zneg_pos (n : pos_num) : -pos n = neg n := rfl
theorem zneg_neg (n : pos_num) : -neg n = pos n := rfl
theorem zneg_zneg (n : znum) : - -n = n := by cases n; refl
theorem zneg_bit1 (n : znum) : -n.bit1 = (-n).bitm1 := by cases n; refl
theorem zneg_bitm1 (n : znum) : -n.bitm1 = (-n).bit1 := by cases n; refl
theorem zneg_succ (n : znum) : -n.succ = (-n).pred :=
by cases n; try {refl}; rw [succ, num.zneg_to_znum_neg]; refl
theorem zneg_pred (n : znum) : -n.pred = (-n).succ :=
by rw [← zneg_zneg (succ (-n)), zneg_succ, zneg_zneg]
@[simp] theorem neg_of_int : ∀ n, ((-n : ℤ) : znum) = -n
| (n+1:ℕ) := rfl
| 0 := rfl
| -[1+n] := (zneg_zneg _).symm
@[simp] theorem cast_to_int [add_group α] [has_one α] : ∀ n : znum, ((n : ℤ) : α) = n
| 0 := rfl
| (pos p) := by rw [cast_pos, cast_pos, pos_num.cast_to_int]
| (neg p) := by rw [cast_neg, cast_neg, int.cast_neg, pos_num.cast_to_int]
theorem bit0_of_bit0 : ∀ n : znum, _root_.bit0 n = n.bit0
| 0 := rfl
| (pos a) := congr_arg pos a.bit0_of_bit0
| (neg a) := congr_arg neg a.bit0_of_bit0
theorem bit1_of_bit1 : ∀ n : znum, _root_.bit1 n = n.bit1
| 0 := rfl
| (pos a) := congr_arg pos a.bit1_of_bit1
| (neg a) := show pos_num.sub' 1 (_root_.bit0 a) = _,
by rw [pos_num.one_sub', a.bit0_of_bit0]; refl
@[simp] theorem cast_bit0 [add_group α] [has_one α] :
∀ n : znum, (n.bit0 : α) = bit0 n
| 0 := (add_zero _).symm
| (pos p) := by rw [znum.bit0, cast_pos, cast_pos]; refl
| (neg p) := by rw [znum.bit0, cast_neg, cast_neg, pos_num.cast_bit0,
_root_.bit0, _root_.bit0, neg_add_rev]
@[simp] theorem cast_bit1 [add_group α] [has_one α] :
∀ n : znum, (n.bit1 : α) = bit1 n
| 0 := by simp [znum.bit1, _root_.bit1, _root_.bit0]
| (pos p) := by rw [znum.bit1, cast_pos, cast_pos]; refl
| (neg p) := begin
rw [znum.bit1, cast_neg, cast_neg],
cases e : pred' p;
have : p = _ := (succ'_pred' p).symm.trans
(congr_arg num.succ' e),
{ change p=1 at this, subst p,
simp [_root_.bit1, _root_.bit0] },
{ rw [num.succ'] at this, subst p,
have : (↑(-↑a:ℤ) : α) = -1 + ↑(-↑a + 1 : ℤ), {simp},
simpa [_root_.bit1, _root_.bit0, -add_comm] },
end
@[simp] theorem cast_bitm1 [add_group α] [has_one α]
(n : znum) : (n.bitm1 : α) = bit0 n - 1 :=
begin
conv { to_lhs, rw ← zneg_zneg n },
rw [← zneg_bit1, cast_zneg, cast_bit1],
have : ((-1 + n + n : ℤ) : α) = (n + n + -1 : ℤ), {simp},
simpa [_root_.bit1, _root_.bit0, -add_comm]
end
theorem add_zero (n : znum) : n + 0 = n := by cases n; refl
theorem zero_add (n : znum) : 0 + n = n := by cases n; refl
theorem add_one : ∀ n : znum, n + 1 = succ n
| 0 := rfl
| (pos p) := congr_arg pos p.add_one
| (neg p) := by cases p; refl
end znum
namespace pos_num
variables {α : Type*}
theorem cast_to_znum : ∀ n : pos_num, (n : znum) = znum.pos n
| 1 := rfl
| (bit0 p) := (znum.bit0_of_bit0 p).trans $ congr_arg _ (cast_to_znum p)
| (bit1 p) := (znum.bit1_of_bit1 p).trans $ congr_arg _ (cast_to_znum p)
theorem cast_sub' [add_group α] [has_one α] : ∀ m n : pos_num, (sub' m n : α) = m - n
| a 1 := by rw [sub'_one, num.cast_to_znum,
← num.cast_to_nat, pred'_to_nat, ← nat.sub_one];
simp [pos_num.cast_pos]
| 1 b := by rw [one_sub', num.cast_to_znum_neg, ← neg_sub, neg_inj',
← num.cast_to_nat, pred'_to_nat, ← nat.sub_one];
simp [pos_num.cast_pos]
| (bit0 a) (bit0 b) := begin
rw [sub', znum.cast_bit0, cast_sub'],
have : ((a + -b + (a + -b) : ℤ) : α) = a + a + (-b + -b), {simp},
simpa [_root_.bit0, -add_left_comm]
end
| (bit0 a) (bit1 b) := begin
rw [sub', znum.cast_bitm1, cast_sub'],
have : ((-b + (a + (-b + -1)) : ℤ) : α) = (a + -1 + (-b + -b):ℤ), {simp},
simpa [_root_.bit1, _root_.bit0, -add_left_comm, -add_comm]
end
| (bit1 a) (bit0 b) := begin
rw [sub', znum.cast_bit1, cast_sub'],
have : ((-b + (a + (-b + 1)) : ℤ) : α) = (a + 1 + (-b + -b):ℤ), {simp},
simpa [_root_.bit1, _root_.bit0, -add_left_comm, -add_comm]
end
| (bit1 a) (bit1 b) := begin
rw [sub', znum.cast_bit0, cast_sub'],
have : ((-b + (a + -b) : ℤ) : α) = a + (-b + -b), {simp},
simpa [_root_.bit1, _root_.bit0, -add_left_comm, add_neg_cancel_left]
end
end pos_num
namespace num
variables {α : Type*}
theorem cast_sub' [add_group α] [has_one α] : ∀ m n : num, (sub' m n : α) = m - n
| 0 0 := (sub_zero _).symm
| (pos a) 0 := (sub_zero _).symm
| 0 (pos b) := (zero_sub _).symm
| (pos a) (pos b) := pos_num.cast_sub' _ _
@[simp] theorem of_nat_to_znum : ∀ n : ℕ, num.to_znum n = n
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := by rw [nat.cast_add_one, nat.cast_add_one,
znum.add_one, add_one, ← of_nat_to_znum]; cases (n:num); refl
@[simp] theorem of_nat_to_znum_neg (n : ℕ) : num.to_znum_neg n = -n :=
by rw [← of_nat_to_znum, zneg_to_znum]
end num
namespace znum
variables {α : Type*}
@[simp] theorem cast_add [add_group α] [has_one α] : ∀ m n, ((m + n : znum) : α) = m + n
| 0 a := by cases a; exact (_root_.zero_add _).symm
| b 0 := by cases b; exact (_root_.add_zero _).symm
| (pos a) (pos b) := pos_num.cast_add _ _
| (pos a) (neg b) := pos_num.cast_sub' _ _
| (neg a) (pos b) := (pos_num.cast_sub' _ _).trans $
show ↑b + -↑a = -↑a + ↑b, by rw [← pos_num.cast_to_int a, ← pos_num.cast_to_int b,
← int.cast_neg, ← int.cast_add (-a)]; simp
| (neg a) (neg b) := show -(↑(a + b) : α) = -a + -b, by rw [
pos_num.cast_add, neg_eq_iff_neg_eq, neg_add_rev, neg_neg, neg_neg,
← pos_num.cast_to_int a, ← pos_num.cast_to_int b, ← int.cast_add]; simp
@[simp] theorem cast_succ [add_group α] [has_one α] (n) : ((succ n : znum) : α) = n + 1 :=
by rw [← add_one, cast_add, cast_one]
@[simp] theorem mul_to_int : ∀ m n, ((m * n : znum) : ℤ) = m * n
| 0 a := by cases a; exact (_root_.zero_mul _).symm
| b 0 := by cases b; exact (_root_.mul_zero _).symm
| (pos a) (pos b) := pos_num.cast_mul a b
| (pos a) (neg b) := show -↑(a * b) = ↑a * -↑b, by rw [pos_num.cast_mul, neg_mul_eq_mul_neg]
| (neg a) (pos b) := show -↑(a * b) = -↑a * ↑b, by rw [pos_num.cast_mul, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul]
| (neg a) (neg b) := show ↑(a * b) = -↑a * -↑b, by rw [pos_num.cast_mul, neg_mul_neg]
theorem cast_mul [ring α] (m n) : ((m * n : znum) : α) = m * n :=
by rw [← cast_to_int, mul_to_int, int.cast_mul, cast_to_int, cast_to_int]
@[simp] theorem of_to_int : Π (n : znum), ((n : ℤ) : znum) = n
| 0 := rfl
| (pos a) := by rw [cast_pos, ← pos_num.cast_to_nat,
int.cast_coe_nat', ← num.of_nat_to_znum, pos_num.of_to_nat]; refl
| (neg a) := by rw [cast_neg, neg_of_int, ← pos_num.cast_to_nat,
int.cast_coe_nat', ← num.of_nat_to_znum_neg, pos_num.of_to_nat]; refl
@[simp] theorem to_of_int : Π (n : ℤ), ((n : znum) : ℤ) = n
| (n : ℕ) := by rw [int.cast_coe_nat,
← num.of_nat_to_znum, num.cast_to_znum, ← num.cast_to_nat,
int.nat_cast_eq_coe_nat, num.to_of_nat]
| -[1+ n] := by rw [int.cast_neg_succ_of_nat, cast_zneg,
add_one, cast_succ, int.neg_succ_of_nat_eq,
← num.of_nat_to_znum, num.cast_to_znum, ← num.cast_to_nat,
int.nat_cast_eq_coe_nat, num.to_of_nat]
theorem to_int_inj {m n : znum} : (m : ℤ) = n ↔ m = n :=
⟨λ h, function.injective_of_left_inverse of_to_int h, congr_arg _⟩
theorem cmp_to_int : ∀ (m n), (ordering.cases_on (cmp m n) ((m:ℤ) < n) (m = n) ((m:ℤ) > n) : Prop)
| 0 0 := rfl
| (pos a) (pos b) := begin
have := pos_num.cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; dsimp [cmp];
cases pos_num.cmp a b; dsimp;
[simp, exact congr_arg pos, simp [gt]]
end
| (neg a) (neg b) := begin
have := pos_num.cmp_to_nat b a; revert this; dsimp [cmp];
cases pos_num.cmp b a; dsimp;
[simp, simp {contextual := tt}, simp [gt]]
end
| (pos a) 0 := pos_num.cast_pos _
| (pos a) (neg b) := lt_trans (neg_lt_zero.2 $ pos_num.cast_pos _) (pos_num.cast_pos _)
| 0 (neg b) := neg_lt_zero.2 $ pos_num.cast_pos _
| (neg a) 0 := neg_lt_zero.2 $ pos_num.cast_pos _
| (neg a) (pos b) := lt_trans (neg_lt_zero.2 $ pos_num.cast_pos _) (pos_num.cast_pos _)
| 0 (pos b) := pos_num.cast_pos _
@[simp] theorem lt_to_int {m n : znum} : (m:ℤ) < n ↔ m < n :=
show (m:ℤ) < n ↔ cmp m n = ordering.lt, from
match cmp m n, cmp_to_int m n with
| ordering.lt, h := by simp at h; simp [h]
| ordering.eq, h := by simp at h; simp [h, lt_irrefl]; exact dec_trivial
| ordering.gt, h := by simp [not_lt_of_gt h]; exact dec_trivial
end
@[simp] theorem le_to_int {m n : znum} : (m:ℤ) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n :=
by rw ← not_lt; exact not_congr lt_to_int
@[simp] theorem cast_lt [linear_ordered_ring α] {m n : znum} : (m:α) < n ↔ m < n :=
by rw [← cast_to_int m, ← cast_to_int n, int.cast_lt, lt_to_int]
@[simp] theorem cast_le [linear_ordered_ring α] {m n : znum} : (m:α) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n :=
by rw ← not_lt; exact not_congr cast_lt
@[simp] theorem cast_inj [linear_ordered_ring α] {m n : znum} : (m:α) = n ↔ m = n :=
by rw [← cast_to_int m, ← cast_to_int n, int.cast_inj, to_int_inj]
meta def transfer_rw : tactic unit :=
`[repeat {rw ← to_int_inj <|> rw ← lt_to_int <|> rw ← le_to_int},
repeat {rw cast_add <|> rw mul_to_int <|> rw cast_one <|> rw cast_zero}]
meta def transfer : tactic unit := `[intros, transfer_rw, try {simp [mul_comm, mul_left_comm]}]
instance : decidable_linear_order znum :=
{ lt := (<),
lt_iff_le_not_le := by {intros a b, transfer_rw, apply lt_iff_le_not_le},
le := (≤),
le_refl := by transfer,
le_trans := by {intros a b c, transfer_rw, apply le_trans},
le_antisymm := by {intros a b, transfer_rw, apply le_antisymm},
le_total := by {intros a b, transfer_rw, apply le_total},
decidable_eq := znum.decidable_eq,
decidable_le := znum.decidable_le,
decidable_lt := znum.decidable_lt }
instance : add_comm_group znum :=
{ add := (+),
add_assoc := by transfer,
zero := 0,
zero_add := zero_add,
add_zero := add_zero,
add_comm := by transfer,
neg := has_neg.neg,
add_left_neg := by transfer }
instance : decidable_linear_ordered_comm_ring znum :=
{ mul := (*),
mul_assoc := by transfer,
one := 1,
one_mul := by transfer,
mul_one := by transfer,
left_distrib := by {transfer, simp [mul_add]},
right_distrib := by {transfer, simp [mul_add, mul_comm]},
mul_comm := by transfer,
zero_ne_one := dec_trivial,
add_le_add_left := by {intros a b h c, revert h, transfer_rw, exact λ h, add_le_add_left h c},
add_lt_add_left := by {intros a b h c, revert h, transfer_rw, exact λ h, add_lt_add_left h c},
mul_pos := by {intros a b, transfer_rw, apply mul_pos},
mul_nonneg := by {intros x y,
change 0 ≤ x → 0 ≤ y → 0 ≤ x * y,
transfer_rw, apply mul_nonneg},
zero_lt_one := dec_trivial,
..znum.decidable_linear_order, ..znum.add_comm_group }
end znum
|
3a79ddc5952e0902c456ce53bebc51a7cb6f538c | 94e33a31faa76775069b071adea97e86e218a8ee | /src/order/filter/bases.lean | 0d7288657433ca455546f9f4082d80503e171bd2 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | urkud/mathlib | eab80095e1b9f1513bfb7f25b4fa82fa4fd02989 | 6379d39e6b5b279df9715f8011369a301b634e41 | refs/heads/master | 1,658,425,342,662 | 1,658,078,703,000 | 1,658,078,703,000 | 186,910,338 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,512,083,000 | 1,557,958,709,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 44,172 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
-/
import data.prod.pprod
import data.set.countable
import order.filter.basic
/-!
# Filter bases
A filter basis `B : filter_basis α` on a type `α` is a nonempty collection of sets of `α`
such that the intersection of two elements of this collection contains some element of
the collection. Compared to filters, filter bases do not require that any set containing
an element of `B` belongs to `B`.
A filter basis `B` can be used to construct `B.filter : filter α` such that a set belongs
to `B.filter` if and only if it contains an element of `B`.
Given an indexing type `ι`, a predicate `p : ι → Prop`, and a map `s : ι → set α`,
the proposition `h : filter.is_basis p s` makes sure the range of `s` bounded by `p`
(ie. `s '' set_of p`) defines a filter basis `h.filter_basis`.
If one already has a filter `l` on `α`, `filter.has_basis l p s` (where `p : ι → Prop`
and `s : ι → set α` as above) means that a set belongs to `l` if and
only if it contains some `s i` with `p i`. It implies `h : filter.is_basis p s`, and
`l = h.filter_basis.filter`. The point of this definition is that checking statements
involving elements of `l` often reduces to checking them on the basis elements.
We define a function `has_basis.index (h : filter.has_basis l p s) (t) (ht : t ∈ l)` that returns
some index `i` such that `p i` and `s i ⊆ t`. This function can be useful to avoid manual
destruction of `h.mem_iff.mpr ht` using `cases` or `let`.
This file also introduces more restricted classes of bases, involving monotonicity or
countability. In particular, for `l : filter α`, `l.is_countably_generated` means
there is a countable set of sets which generates `s`. This is reformulated in term of bases,
and consequences are derived.
## Main statements
* `has_basis.mem_iff`, `has_basis.mem_of_superset`, `has_basis.mem_of_mem` : restate `t ∈ f`
in terms of a basis;
* `basis_sets` : all sets of a filter form a basis;
* `has_basis.inf`, `has_basis.inf_principal`, `has_basis.prod`, `has_basis.prod_self`,
`has_basis.map`, `has_basis.comap` : combinators to construct filters of `l ⊓ l'`,
`l ⊓ 𝓟 t`, `l ×ᶠ l'`, `l ×ᶠ l`, `l.map f`, `l.comap f` respectively;
* `has_basis.le_iff`, `has_basis.ge_iff`, has_basis.le_basis_iff` : restate `l ≤ l'` in terms
of bases.
* `has_basis.tendsto_right_iff`, `has_basis.tendsto_left_iff`, `has_basis.tendsto_iff` : restate
`tendsto f l l'` in terms of bases.
* `is_countably_generated_iff_exists_antitone_basis` : proves a filter is
countably generated if and only if it admits a basis parametrized by a
decreasing sequence of sets indexed by `ℕ`.
* `tendsto_iff_seq_tendsto ` : an abstract version of "sequentially continuous implies continuous".
## Implementation notes
As with `Union`/`bUnion`/`sUnion`, there are three different approaches to filter bases:
* `has_basis l s`, `s : set (set α)`;
* `has_basis l s`, `s : ι → set α`;
* `has_basis l p s`, `p : ι → Prop`, `s : ι → set α`.
We use the latter one because, e.g., `𝓝 x` in an `emetric_space` or in a `metric_space` has a basis
of this form. The other two can be emulated using `s = id` or `p = λ _, true`.
With this approach sometimes one needs to `simp` the statement provided by the `has_basis`
machinery, e.g., `simp only [exists_prop, true_and]` or `simp only [forall_const]` can help
with the case `p = λ _, true`.
-/
open set filter
open_locale filter classical
section sort
variables {α β γ : Type*} {ι ι' : Sort*}
/-- A filter basis `B` on a type `α` is a nonempty collection of sets of `α`
such that the intersection of two elements of this collection contains some element
of the collection. -/
structure filter_basis (α : Type*) :=
(sets : set (set α))
(nonempty : sets.nonempty)
(inter_sets {x y} : x ∈ sets → y ∈ sets → ∃ z ∈ sets, z ⊆ x ∩ y)
instance filter_basis.nonempty_sets (B : filter_basis α) : nonempty B.sets := B.nonempty.to_subtype
/-- If `B` is a filter basis on `α`, and `U` a subset of `α` then we can write `U ∈ B` as
on paper. -/
@[reducible]
instance {α : Type*}: has_mem (set α) (filter_basis α) := ⟨λ U B, U ∈ B.sets⟩
-- For illustration purposes, the filter basis defining (at_top : filter ℕ)
instance : inhabited (filter_basis ℕ) :=
⟨{ sets := range Ici,
nonempty := ⟨Ici 0, mem_range_self 0⟩,
inter_sets := begin
rintros _ _ ⟨n, rfl⟩ ⟨m, rfl⟩,
refine ⟨Ici (max n m), mem_range_self _, _⟩,
rintros p p_in,
split ; rw mem_Ici at *,
exact le_of_max_le_left p_in,
exact le_of_max_le_right p_in,
end }⟩
/-- View a filter as a filter basis. -/
def filter.as_basis (f : filter α) : filter_basis α :=
⟨f.sets, ⟨univ, univ_mem⟩, λ x y hx hy, ⟨x ∩ y, inter_mem hx hy, subset_rfl⟩⟩
/-- `is_basis p s` means the image of `s` bounded by `p` is a filter basis. -/
protected structure filter.is_basis (p : ι → Prop) (s : ι → set α) : Prop :=
(nonempty : ∃ i, p i)
(inter : ∀ {i j}, p i → p j → ∃ k, p k ∧ s k ⊆ s i ∩ s j)
namespace filter
namespace is_basis
/-- Constructs a filter basis from an indexed family of sets satisfying `is_basis`. -/
protected def filter_basis {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → set α} (h : is_basis p s) : filter_basis α :=
{ sets := {t | ∃ i, p i ∧ s i = t},
nonempty := let ⟨i, hi⟩ := h.nonempty in ⟨s i, ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩⟩,
inter_sets := by { rintros _ _ ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩ ⟨j, hj, rfl⟩,
rcases h.inter hi hj with ⟨k, hk, hk'⟩,
exact ⟨_, ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩, hk'⟩ } }
variables {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → set α} (h : is_basis p s)
lemma mem_filter_basis_iff {U : set α} : U ∈ h.filter_basis ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ s i = U :=
iff.rfl
end is_basis
end filter
namespace filter_basis
/-- The filter associated to a filter basis. -/
protected def filter (B : filter_basis α) : filter α :=
{ sets := {s | ∃ t ∈ B, t ⊆ s},
univ_sets := let ⟨s, s_in⟩ := B.nonempty in ⟨s, s_in, s.subset_univ⟩,
sets_of_superset := λ x y ⟨s, s_in, h⟩ hxy, ⟨s, s_in, set.subset.trans h hxy⟩,
inter_sets := λ x y ⟨s, s_in, hs⟩ ⟨t, t_in, ht⟩,
let ⟨u, u_in, u_sub⟩ := B.inter_sets s_in t_in in
⟨u, u_in, set.subset.trans u_sub $ set.inter_subset_inter hs ht⟩ }
lemma mem_filter_iff (B : filter_basis α) {U : set α} : U ∈ B.filter ↔ ∃ s ∈ B, s ⊆ U :=
iff.rfl
lemma mem_filter_of_mem (B : filter_basis α) {U : set α} : U ∈ B → U ∈ B.filter:=
λ U_in, ⟨U, U_in, subset.refl _⟩
lemma eq_infi_principal (B : filter_basis α) : B.filter = ⨅ s : B.sets, 𝓟 s :=
begin
have : directed (≥) (λ (s : B.sets), 𝓟 (s : set α)),
{ rintros ⟨U, U_in⟩ ⟨V, V_in⟩,
rcases B.inter_sets U_in V_in with ⟨W, W_in, W_sub⟩,
use [W, W_in],
simp only [ge_iff_le, le_principal_iff, mem_principal, subtype.coe_mk],
exact subset_inter_iff.mp W_sub },
ext U,
simp [mem_filter_iff, mem_infi_of_directed this]
end
protected lemma generate (B : filter_basis α) : generate B.sets = B.filter :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ intros U U_in,
rcases B.mem_filter_iff.mp U_in with ⟨V, V_in, h⟩,
exact generate_sets.superset (generate_sets.basic V_in) h },
{ rw sets_iff_generate,
apply mem_filter_of_mem }
end
end filter_basis
namespace filter
namespace is_basis
variables {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → set α}
/-- Constructs a filter from an indexed family of sets satisfying `is_basis`. -/
protected def filter (h : is_basis p s) : filter α := h.filter_basis.filter
protected lemma mem_filter_iff (h : is_basis p s) {U : set α} :
U ∈ h.filter ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ s i ⊆ U :=
begin
erw [h.filter_basis.mem_filter_iff],
simp only [mem_filter_basis_iff h, exists_prop],
split,
{ rintros ⟨_, ⟨i, pi, rfl⟩, h⟩,
tauto },
{ tauto }
end
lemma filter_eq_generate (h : is_basis p s) : h.filter = generate {U | ∃ i, p i ∧ s i = U} :=
by erw h.filter_basis.generate ; refl
end is_basis
/-- We say that a filter `l` has a basis `s : ι → set α` bounded by `p : ι → Prop`,
if `t ∈ l` if and only if `t` includes `s i` for some `i` such that `p i`. -/
protected structure has_basis (l : filter α) (p : ι → Prop) (s : ι → set α) : Prop :=
(mem_iff' : ∀ (t : set α), t ∈ l ↔ ∃ i (hi : p i), s i ⊆ t)
section same_type
variables {l l' : filter α} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → set α} {t : set α} {i : ι}
{p' : ι' → Prop} {s' : ι' → set α} {i' : ι'}
lemma has_basis_generate (s : set (set α)) :
(generate s).has_basis (λ t, set.finite t ∧ t ⊆ s) (λ t, ⋂₀ t) :=
⟨begin
intro U,
rw mem_generate_iff,
apply exists_congr,
tauto
end⟩
/-- The smallest filter basis containing a given collection of sets. -/
def filter_basis.of_sets (s : set (set α)) : filter_basis α :=
{ sets := sInter '' { t | set.finite t ∧ t ⊆ s},
nonempty := ⟨univ, ∅, ⟨⟨finite_empty, empty_subset s⟩, sInter_empty⟩⟩,
inter_sets := begin
rintros _ _ ⟨a, ⟨fina, suba⟩, rfl⟩ ⟨b, ⟨finb, subb⟩, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨⋂₀ (a ∪ b), mem_image_of_mem _ ⟨fina.union finb, union_subset suba subb⟩,
by rw sInter_union⟩,
end }
/-- Definition of `has_basis` unfolded with implicit set argument. -/
lemma has_basis.mem_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) : t ∈ l ↔ ∃ i (hi : p i), s i ⊆ t :=
hl.mem_iff' t
lemma has_basis.eq_of_same_basis (hl : l.has_basis p s) (hl' : l'.has_basis p s) : l = l' :=
begin
ext t,
rw [hl.mem_iff, hl'.mem_iff]
end
lemma has_basis_iff : l.has_basis p s ↔ ∀ t, t ∈ l ↔ ∃ i (hi : p i), s i ⊆ t :=
⟨λ ⟨h⟩, h, λ h, ⟨h⟩⟩
lemma has_basis.ex_mem (h : l.has_basis p s) : ∃ i, p i :=
let ⟨i, pi, h⟩ := h.mem_iff.mp univ_mem in ⟨i, pi⟩
protected lemma has_basis.nonempty (h : l.has_basis p s) : nonempty ι :=
nonempty_of_exists h.ex_mem
protected lemma is_basis.has_basis (h : is_basis p s) : has_basis h.filter p s :=
⟨λ t, by simp only [h.mem_filter_iff, exists_prop]⟩
lemma has_basis.mem_of_superset (hl : l.has_basis p s) (hi : p i) (ht : s i ⊆ t) : t ∈ l :=
(hl.mem_iff).2 ⟨i, hi, ht⟩
lemma has_basis.mem_of_mem (hl : l.has_basis p s) (hi : p i) : s i ∈ l :=
hl.mem_of_superset hi $ subset.refl _
/-- Index of a basis set such that `s i ⊆ t` as an element of `subtype p`. -/
noncomputable def has_basis.index (h : l.has_basis p s) (t : set α) (ht : t ∈ l) :
{i : ι // p i} :=
⟨(h.mem_iff.1 ht).some, (h.mem_iff.1 ht).some_spec.fst⟩
lemma has_basis.property_index (h : l.has_basis p s) (ht : t ∈ l) : p (h.index t ht) :=
(h.index t ht).2
lemma has_basis.set_index_mem (h : l.has_basis p s) (ht : t ∈ l) : s (h.index t ht) ∈ l :=
h.mem_of_mem $ h.property_index _
lemma has_basis.set_index_subset (h : l.has_basis p s) (ht : t ∈ l) : s (h.index t ht) ⊆ t :=
(h.mem_iff.1 ht).some_spec.snd
lemma has_basis.is_basis (h : l.has_basis p s) : is_basis p s :=
{ nonempty := let ⟨i, hi, H⟩ := h.mem_iff.mp univ_mem in ⟨i, hi⟩,
inter := λ i j hi hj, by simpa [h.mem_iff]
using l.inter_sets (h.mem_of_mem hi) (h.mem_of_mem hj) }
lemma has_basis.filter_eq (h : l.has_basis p s) : h.is_basis.filter = l :=
by { ext U, simp [h.mem_iff, is_basis.mem_filter_iff] }
lemma has_basis.eq_generate (h : l.has_basis p s) : l = generate { U | ∃ i, p i ∧ s i = U } :=
by rw [← h.is_basis.filter_eq_generate, h.filter_eq]
lemma generate_eq_generate_inter (s : set (set α)) :
generate s = generate (sInter '' { t | set.finite t ∧ t ⊆ s}) :=
by erw [(filter_basis.of_sets s).generate, ← (has_basis_generate s).filter_eq] ; refl
lemma of_sets_filter_eq_generate (s : set (set α)) : (filter_basis.of_sets s).filter = generate s :=
by rw [← (filter_basis.of_sets s).generate, generate_eq_generate_inter s] ; refl
protected lemma _root_.filter_basis.has_basis {α : Type*} (B : filter_basis α) :
has_basis (B.filter) (λ s : set α, s ∈ B) id :=
⟨λ t, B.mem_filter_iff⟩
lemma has_basis.to_has_basis' (hl : l.has_basis p s) (h : ∀ i, p i → ∃ i', p' i' ∧ s' i' ⊆ s i)
(h' : ∀ i', p' i' → s' i' ∈ l) : l.has_basis p' s' :=
begin
refine ⟨λ t, ⟨λ ht, _, λ ⟨i', hi', ht⟩, mem_of_superset (h' i' hi') ht⟩⟩,
rcases hl.mem_iff.1 ht with ⟨i, hi, ht⟩,
rcases h i hi with ⟨i', hi', hs's⟩,
exact ⟨i', hi', subset.trans hs's ht⟩
end
lemma has_basis.to_has_basis (hl : l.has_basis p s) (h : ∀ i, p i → ∃ i', p' i' ∧ s' i' ⊆ s i)
(h' : ∀ i', p' i' → ∃ i, p i ∧ s i ⊆ s' i') : l.has_basis p' s' :=
hl.to_has_basis' h $ λ i' hi', let ⟨i, hi, hss'⟩ := h' i' hi' in hl.mem_iff.2 ⟨i, hi, hss'⟩
lemma has_basis.to_subset (hl : l.has_basis p s) {t : ι → set α} (h : ∀ i, p i → t i ⊆ s i)
(ht : ∀ i, p i → t i ∈ l) : l.has_basis p t :=
hl.to_has_basis' (λ i hi, ⟨i, hi, h i hi⟩) ht
lemma has_basis.eventually_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, q x) ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s i → q x :=
by simpa using hl.mem_iff
lemma has_basis.frequently_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in l, q x) ↔ ∀ i, p i → ∃ x ∈ s i, q x :=
by simp [filter.frequently, hl.eventually_iff]
lemma has_basis.exists_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) {P : set α → Prop}
(mono : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, s ⊆ t → P t → P s) :
(∃ s ∈ l, P s) ↔ ∃ (i) (hi : p i), P (s i) :=
⟨λ ⟨s, hs, hP⟩, let ⟨i, hi, his⟩ := hl.mem_iff.1 hs in ⟨i, hi, mono his hP⟩,
λ ⟨i, hi, hP⟩, ⟨s i, hl.mem_of_mem hi, hP⟩⟩
lemma has_basis.forall_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) {P : set α → Prop}
(mono : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, s ⊆ t → P s → P t) :
(∀ s ∈ l, P s) ↔ ∀ i, p i → P (s i) :=
⟨λ H i hi, H (s i) $ hl.mem_of_mem hi,
λ H s hs, let ⟨i, hi, his⟩ := hl.mem_iff.1 hs in mono his (H i hi)⟩
lemma has_basis.ne_bot_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) :
ne_bot l ↔ (∀ {i}, p i → (s i).nonempty) :=
forall_mem_nonempty_iff_ne_bot.symm.trans $ hl.forall_iff $ λ _ _, nonempty.mono
lemma has_basis.eq_bot_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) :
l = ⊥ ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ s i = ∅ :=
not_iff_not.1 $ ne_bot_iff.symm.trans $ hl.ne_bot_iff.trans $
by simp only [not_exists, not_and, ← ne_empty_iff_nonempty]
lemma basis_sets (l : filter α) : l.has_basis (λ s : set α, s ∈ l) id :=
⟨λ t, exists_mem_subset_iff.symm⟩
lemma as_basis_filter (f : filter α) : f.as_basis.filter = f :=
by ext t; exact exists_mem_subset_iff
lemma has_basis_self {l : filter α} {P : set α → Prop} :
has_basis l (λ s, s ∈ l ∧ P s) id ↔ ∀ t ∈ l, ∃ r ∈ l, P r ∧ r ⊆ t :=
begin
simp only [has_basis_iff, exists_prop, id, and_assoc],
exact forall_congr (λ s, ⟨λ h, h.1, λ h, ⟨h, λ ⟨t, hl, hP, hts⟩, mem_of_superset hl hts⟩⟩)
end
lemma has_basis.comp_of_surjective (h : l.has_basis p s) {g : ι' → ι} (hg : function.surjective g) :
l.has_basis (p ∘ g) (s ∘ g) :=
⟨λ t, h.mem_iff.trans hg.exists⟩
lemma has_basis.comp_equiv (h : l.has_basis p s) (e : ι' ≃ ι) : l.has_basis (p ∘ e) (s ∘ e) :=
h.comp_of_surjective e.surjective
/-- If `{s i | p i}` is a basis of a filter `l` and each `s i` includes `s j` such that
`p j ∧ q j`, then `{s j | p j ∧ q j}` is a basis of `l`. -/
lemma has_basis.restrict (h : l.has_basis p s) {q : ι → Prop}
(hq : ∀ i, p i → ∃ j, p j ∧ q j ∧ s j ⊆ s i) :
l.has_basis (λ i, p i ∧ q i) s :=
begin
refine ⟨λ t, ⟨λ ht, _, λ ⟨i, hpi, hti⟩, h.mem_iff.2 ⟨i, hpi.1, hti⟩⟩⟩,
rcases h.mem_iff.1 ht with ⟨i, hpi, hti⟩,
rcases hq i hpi with ⟨j, hpj, hqj, hji⟩,
exact ⟨j, ⟨hpj, hqj⟩, subset.trans hji hti⟩
end
/-- If `{s i | p i}` is a basis of a filter `l` and `V ∈ l`, then `{s i | p i ∧ s i ⊆ V}`
is a basis of `l`. -/
lemma has_basis.restrict_subset (h : l.has_basis p s) {V : set α} (hV : V ∈ l) :
l.has_basis (λ i, p i ∧ s i ⊆ V) s :=
h.restrict $ λ i hi, (h.mem_iff.1 (inter_mem hV (h.mem_of_mem hi))).imp $
λ j hj, ⟨hj.fst, subset_inter_iff.1 hj.snd⟩
lemma has_basis.has_basis_self_subset {p : set α → Prop} (h : l.has_basis (λ s, s ∈ l ∧ p s) id)
{V : set α} (hV : V ∈ l) : l.has_basis (λ s, s ∈ l ∧ p s ∧ s ⊆ V) id :=
by simpa only [and_assoc] using h.restrict_subset hV
theorem has_basis.ge_iff (hl' : l'.has_basis p' s') : l ≤ l' ↔ ∀ i', p' i' → s' i' ∈ l :=
⟨λ h i' hi', h $ hl'.mem_of_mem hi',
λ h s hs, let ⟨i', hi', hs⟩ := hl'.mem_iff.1 hs in mem_of_superset (h _ hi') hs⟩
theorem has_basis.le_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) : l ≤ l' ↔ ∀ t ∈ l', ∃ i (hi : p i), s i ⊆ t :=
by simp only [le_def, hl.mem_iff]
theorem has_basis.le_basis_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) (hl' : l'.has_basis p' s') :
l ≤ l' ↔ ∀ i', p' i' → ∃ i (hi : p i), s i ⊆ s' i' :=
by simp only [hl'.ge_iff, hl.mem_iff]
lemma has_basis.ext (hl : l.has_basis p s) (hl' : l'.has_basis p' s')
(h : ∀ i, p i → ∃ i', p' i' ∧ s' i' ⊆ s i)
(h' : ∀ i', p' i' → ∃ i, p i ∧ s i ⊆ s' i') : l = l' :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ rw hl.le_basis_iff hl',
simpa using h' },
{ rw hl'.le_basis_iff hl,
simpa using h },
end
lemma has_basis.inf' (hl : l.has_basis p s) (hl' : l'.has_basis p' s') :
(l ⊓ l').has_basis (λ i : pprod ι ι', p i.1 ∧ p' i.2) (λ i, s i.1 ∩ s' i.2) :=
⟨begin
intro t,
split,
{ simp only [mem_inf_iff, exists_prop, hl.mem_iff, hl'.mem_iff],
rintros ⟨t, ⟨i, hi, ht⟩, t', ⟨i', hi', ht'⟩, rfl⟩,
use [⟨i, i'⟩, ⟨hi, hi'⟩, inter_subset_inter ht ht'] },
{ rintros ⟨⟨i, i'⟩, ⟨hi, hi'⟩, H⟩,
exact mem_inf_of_inter (hl.mem_of_mem hi) (hl'.mem_of_mem hi') H }
end⟩
lemma has_basis.inf {ι ι' : Type*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → set α} {p' : ι' → Prop}
{s' : ι' → set α} (hl : l.has_basis p s) (hl' : l'.has_basis p' s') :
(l ⊓ l').has_basis (λ i : ι × ι', p i.1 ∧ p' i.2) (λ i, s i.1 ∩ s' i.2) :=
(hl.inf' hl').to_has_basis (λ i hi, ⟨⟨i.1, i.2⟩, hi, subset.rfl⟩)
(λ i hi, ⟨⟨i.1, i.2⟩, hi, subset.rfl⟩)
lemma has_basis_infi {ι : Type*} {ι' : ι → Type*} {l : ι → filter α}
{p : Π i, ι' i → Prop} {s : Π i, ι' i → set α} (hl : ∀ i, (l i).has_basis (p i) (s i)) :
(⨅ i, l i).has_basis (λ If : set ι × Π i, ι' i, If.1.finite ∧ ∀ i ∈ If.1, p i (If.2 i))
(λ If : set ι × Π i, ι' i, ⋂ i ∈ If.1, s i (If.2 i)) :=
⟨begin
intro t,
split,
{ simp only [mem_infi', (hl _).mem_iff],
rintros ⟨I, hI, V, hV, -, hVt, -⟩,
choose u hu using hV,
refine ⟨⟨I, u⟩, ⟨hI, λ i _, (hu i).1⟩, _⟩,
rw hVt,
exact Inter_mono (λ i, Inter_mono $ λ hi, (hu i).2) },
{ rintros ⟨⟨I, f⟩, ⟨hI₁, hI₂⟩, hsub⟩,
refine mem_of_superset _ hsub,
exact (bInter_mem hI₁).mpr (λ i hi, mem_infi_of_mem i $ (hl i).mem_of_mem $ hI₂ _ hi) }
end⟩
lemma has_basis_infi_of_directed' {ι : Type*} {ι' : ι → Sort*}
[nonempty ι]
{l : ι → filter α} (s : Π i, (ι' i) → set α) (p : Π i, (ι' i) → Prop)
(hl : ∀ i, (l i).has_basis (p i) (s i)) (h : directed (≥) l) :
(⨅ i, l i).has_basis (λ (ii' : Σ i, ι' i), p ii'.1 ii'.2) (λ ii', s ii'.1 ii'.2) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ t, _⟩,
rw [mem_infi_of_directed h, sigma.exists],
exact exists_congr (λ i, (hl i).mem_iff)
end
lemma has_basis_infi_of_directed {ι : Type*} {ι' : Sort*}
[nonempty ι]
{l : ι → filter α} (s : ι → ι' → set α) (p : ι → ι' → Prop)
(hl : ∀ i, (l i).has_basis (p i) (s i)) (h : directed (≥) l) :
(⨅ i, l i).has_basis (λ (ii' : ι × ι'), p ii'.1 ii'.2) (λ ii', s ii'.1 ii'.2) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ t, _⟩,
rw [mem_infi_of_directed h, prod.exists],
exact exists_congr (λ i, (hl i).mem_iff)
end
lemma has_basis_binfi_of_directed' {ι : Type*} {ι' : ι → Sort*}
{dom : set ι} (hdom : dom.nonempty)
{l : ι → filter α} (s : Π i, (ι' i) → set α) (p : Π i, (ι' i) → Prop)
(hl : ∀ i ∈ dom, (l i).has_basis (p i) (s i)) (h : directed_on (l ⁻¹'o ge) dom) :
(⨅ i ∈ dom, l i).has_basis (λ (ii' : Σ i, ι' i), ii'.1 ∈ dom ∧ p ii'.1 ii'.2)
(λ ii', s ii'.1 ii'.2) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ t, _⟩,
rw [mem_binfi_of_directed h hdom, sigma.exists],
refine exists_congr (λ i, ⟨_, _⟩),
{ rintros ⟨hi, hti⟩,
rcases (hl i hi).mem_iff.mp hti with ⟨b, hb, hbt⟩,
exact ⟨b, ⟨hi, hb⟩, hbt⟩ },
{ rintros ⟨b, ⟨hi, hb⟩, hibt⟩,
exact ⟨hi, (hl i hi).mem_iff.mpr ⟨b, hb, hibt⟩⟩ }
end
lemma has_basis_binfi_of_directed {ι : Type*} {ι' : Sort*}
{dom : set ι} (hdom : dom.nonempty)
{l : ι → filter α} (s : ι → ι' → set α) (p : ι → ι' → Prop)
(hl : ∀ i ∈ dom, (l i).has_basis (p i) (s i)) (h : directed_on (l ⁻¹'o ge) dom) :
(⨅ i ∈ dom, l i).has_basis (λ (ii' : ι × ι'), ii'.1 ∈ dom ∧ p ii'.1 ii'.2)
(λ ii', s ii'.1 ii'.2) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ t, _⟩,
rw [mem_binfi_of_directed h hdom, prod.exists],
refine exists_congr (λ i, ⟨_, _⟩),
{ rintros ⟨hi, hti⟩,
rcases (hl i hi).mem_iff.mp hti with ⟨b, hb, hbt⟩,
exact ⟨b, ⟨hi, hb⟩, hbt⟩ },
{ rintros ⟨b, ⟨hi, hb⟩, hibt⟩,
exact ⟨hi, (hl i hi).mem_iff.mpr ⟨b, hb, hibt⟩⟩ }
end
lemma has_basis_principal (t : set α) : (𝓟 t).has_basis (λ i : unit, true) (λ i, t) :=
⟨λ U, by simp⟩
lemma has_basis_pure (x : α) : (pure x : filter α).has_basis (λ i : unit, true) (λ i, {x}) :=
by simp only [← principal_singleton, has_basis_principal]
lemma has_basis.sup' (hl : l.has_basis p s) (hl' : l'.has_basis p' s') :
(l ⊔ l').has_basis (λ i : pprod ι ι', p i.1 ∧ p' i.2) (λ i, s i.1 ∪ s' i.2) :=
⟨begin
intros t,
simp only [mem_sup, hl.mem_iff, hl'.mem_iff, pprod.exists, union_subset_iff, exists_prop,
and_assoc, exists_and_distrib_left],
simp only [← and_assoc, exists_and_distrib_right, and_comm]
end⟩
lemma has_basis.sup {ι ι' : Type*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → set α} {p' : ι' → Prop}
{s' : ι' → set α} (hl : l.has_basis p s) (hl' : l'.has_basis p' s') :
(l ⊔ l').has_basis (λ i : ι × ι', p i.1 ∧ p' i.2) (λ i, s i.1 ∪ s' i.2) :=
(hl.sup' hl').to_has_basis (λ i hi, ⟨⟨i.1, i.2⟩, hi, subset.rfl⟩)
(λ i hi, ⟨⟨i.1, i.2⟩, hi, subset.rfl⟩)
lemma has_basis_supr {ι : Sort*} {ι' : ι → Type*} {l : ι → filter α}
{p : Π i, ι' i → Prop} {s : Π i, ι' i → set α} (hl : ∀ i, (l i).has_basis (p i) (s i)) :
(⨆ i, l i).has_basis (λ f : Π i, ι' i, ∀ i, p i (f i)) (λ f : Π i, ι' i, ⋃ i, s i (f i)) :=
has_basis_iff.mpr $ λ t, by simp only [has_basis_iff, (hl _).mem_iff, classical.skolem,
forall_and_distrib, Union_subset_iff, mem_supr]
lemma has_basis.sup_principal (hl : l.has_basis p s) (t : set α) :
(l ⊔ 𝓟 t).has_basis p (λ i, s i ∪ t) :=
⟨λ u, by simp only [(hl.sup' (has_basis_principal t)).mem_iff, pprod.exists, exists_prop, and_true,
unique.exists_iff]⟩
lemma has_basis.sup_pure (hl : l.has_basis p s) (x : α) :
(l ⊔ pure x).has_basis p (λ i, s i ∪ {x}) :=
by simp only [← principal_singleton, hl.sup_principal]
lemma has_basis.inf_principal (hl : l.has_basis p s) (s' : set α) :
(l ⊓ 𝓟 s').has_basis p (λ i, s i ∩ s') :=
⟨λ t, by simp only [mem_inf_principal, hl.mem_iff, subset_def, mem_set_of_eq,
mem_inter_iff, and_imp]⟩
lemma has_basis.inf_basis_ne_bot_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) (hl' : l'.has_basis p' s') :
ne_bot (l ⊓ l') ↔ ∀ ⦃i⦄ (hi : p i) ⦃i'⦄ (hi' : p' i'), (s i ∩ s' i').nonempty :=
(hl.inf' hl').ne_bot_iff.trans $ by simp [@forall_swap _ ι']
lemma has_basis.inf_ne_bot_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) :
ne_bot (l ⊓ l') ↔ ∀ ⦃i⦄ (hi : p i) ⦃s'⦄ (hs' : s' ∈ l'), (s i ∩ s').nonempty :=
hl.inf_basis_ne_bot_iff l'.basis_sets
lemma has_basis.inf_principal_ne_bot_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) {t : set α} :
ne_bot (l ⊓ 𝓟 t) ↔ ∀ ⦃i⦄ (hi : p i), (s i ∩ t).nonempty :=
(hl.inf_principal t).ne_bot_iff
lemma has_basis.disjoint_basis_iff (hl : l.has_basis p s) (hl' : l'.has_basis p' s') :
disjoint l l' ↔ ∃ i (hi : p i) i' (hi' : p' i'), disjoint (s i) (s' i') :=
not_iff_not.mp $ by simp only [disjoint_iff, ← ne.def, ← ne_bot_iff, hl.inf_basis_ne_bot_iff hl',
not_exists, bot_eq_empty, ne_empty_iff_nonempty, inf_eq_inter]
lemma inf_ne_bot_iff :
ne_bot (l ⊓ l') ↔ ∀ ⦃s : set α⦄ (hs : s ∈ l) ⦃s'⦄ (hs' : s' ∈ l'), (s ∩ s').nonempty :=
l.basis_sets.inf_ne_bot_iff
lemma inf_principal_ne_bot_iff {s : set α} :
ne_bot (l ⊓ 𝓟 s) ↔ ∀ U ∈ l, (U ∩ s).nonempty :=
l.basis_sets.inf_principal_ne_bot_iff
lemma mem_iff_inf_principal_compl {f : filter α} {s : set α} :
s ∈ f ↔ f ⊓ 𝓟 sᶜ = ⊥ :=
begin
refine not_iff_not.1 ((inf_principal_ne_bot_iff.trans _).symm.trans ne_bot_iff),
exact ⟨λ h hs, by simpa [empty_not_nonempty] using h s hs,
λ hs t ht, inter_compl_nonempty_iff.2 $ λ hts, hs $ mem_of_superset ht hts⟩,
end
lemma not_mem_iff_inf_principal_compl {f : filter α} {s : set α} :
s ∉ f ↔ ne_bot (f ⊓ 𝓟 sᶜ) :=
(not_congr mem_iff_inf_principal_compl).trans ne_bot_iff.symm
@[simp] lemma disjoint_principal_right {f : filter α} {s : set α} :
disjoint f (𝓟 s) ↔ sᶜ ∈ f :=
by rw [mem_iff_inf_principal_compl, compl_compl, disjoint_iff]
@[simp] lemma disjoint_principal_left {f : filter α} {s : set α} :
disjoint (𝓟 s) f ↔ sᶜ ∈ f :=
by rw [disjoint.comm, disjoint_principal_right]
@[simp] lemma disjoint_principal_principal {s t : set α} :
disjoint (𝓟 s) (𝓟 t) ↔ disjoint s t :=
by simp [←subset_compl_iff_disjoint_left]
alias disjoint_principal_principal ↔ _ _root_.disjoint.filter_principal
@[simp] lemma disjoint_pure_pure {x y : α} :
disjoint (pure x : filter α) (pure y) ↔ x ≠ y :=
by simp only [← principal_singleton, disjoint_principal_principal, disjoint_singleton]
@[simp] lemma compl_diagonal_mem_prod {l₁ l₂ : filter α} :
(diagonal α)ᶜ ∈ l₁ ×ᶠ l₂ ↔ disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
by simp only [mem_prod_iff, filter.disjoint_iff, prod_subset_compl_diagonal_iff_disjoint]
lemma le_iff_forall_inf_principal_compl {f g : filter α} :
f ≤ g ↔ ∀ V ∈ g, f ⊓ 𝓟 Vᶜ = ⊥ :=
forall₂_congr $ λ _ _, mem_iff_inf_principal_compl
lemma inf_ne_bot_iff_frequently_left {f g : filter α} :
ne_bot (f ⊓ g) ↔ ∀ {p : α → Prop}, (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → ∃ᶠ x in g, p x :=
by simpa only [inf_ne_bot_iff, frequently_iff, exists_prop, and_comm]
lemma inf_ne_bot_iff_frequently_right {f g : filter α} :
ne_bot (f ⊓ g) ↔ ∀ {p : α → Prop}, (∀ᶠ x in g, p x) → ∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
by { rw inf_comm, exact inf_ne_bot_iff_frequently_left }
lemma has_basis.eq_binfi (h : l.has_basis p s) :
l = ⨅ i (_ : p i), 𝓟 (s i) :=
eq_binfi_of_mem_iff_exists_mem $ λ t, by simp only [h.mem_iff, mem_principal]
lemma has_basis.eq_infi (h : l.has_basis (λ _, true) s) :
l = ⨅ i, 𝓟 (s i) :=
by simpa only [infi_true] using h.eq_binfi
lemma has_basis_infi_principal {s : ι → set α} (h : directed (≥) s) [nonempty ι] :
(⨅ i, 𝓟 (s i)).has_basis (λ _, true) s :=
⟨begin
refine λ t, (mem_infi_of_directed (h.mono_comp _ _) t).trans $
by simp only [exists_prop, true_and, mem_principal],
exact λ _ _, principal_mono.2
end⟩
/-- If `s : ι → set α` is an indexed family of sets, then finite intersections of `s i` form a basis
of `⨅ i, 𝓟 (s i)`. -/
lemma has_basis_infi_principal_finite {ι : Type*} (s : ι → set α) :
(⨅ i, 𝓟 (s i)).has_basis (λ t : set ι, t.finite) (λ t, ⋂ i ∈ t, s i) :=
begin
refine ⟨λ U, (mem_infi_finite _).trans _⟩,
simp only [infi_principal_finset, mem_Union, mem_principal, exists_prop,
exists_finite_iff_finset, finset.set_bInter_coe]
end
lemma has_basis_binfi_principal {s : β → set α} {S : set β} (h : directed_on (s ⁻¹'o (≥)) S)
(ne : S.nonempty) :
(⨅ i ∈ S, 𝓟 (s i)).has_basis (λ i, i ∈ S) s :=
⟨begin
refine λ t, (mem_binfi_of_directed _ ne).trans $ by simp only [mem_principal],
rw [directed_on_iff_directed, ← directed_comp, (∘)] at h ⊢,
apply h.mono_comp _ _,
exact λ _ _, principal_mono.2
end⟩
lemma has_basis_binfi_principal' {ι : Type*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → set α}
(h : ∀ i, p i → ∀ j, p j → ∃ k (h : p k), s k ⊆ s i ∧ s k ⊆ s j) (ne : ∃ i, p i) :
(⨅ i (h : p i), 𝓟 (s i)).has_basis p s :=
filter.has_basis_binfi_principal h ne
lemma has_basis.map (f : α → β) (hl : l.has_basis p s) :
(l.map f).has_basis p (λ i, f '' (s i)) :=
⟨λ t, by simp only [mem_map, image_subset_iff, hl.mem_iff, preimage]⟩
lemma has_basis.comap (f : β → α) (hl : l.has_basis p s) :
(l.comap f).has_basis p (λ i, f ⁻¹' (s i)) :=
⟨begin
intro t,
simp only [mem_comap, exists_prop, hl.mem_iff],
split,
{ rintros ⟨t', ⟨i, hi, ht'⟩, H⟩,
exact ⟨i, hi, subset.trans (preimage_mono ht') H⟩ },
{ rintros ⟨i, hi, H⟩,
exact ⟨s i, ⟨i, hi, subset.refl _⟩, H⟩ }
end⟩
lemma comap_has_basis (f : α → β) (l : filter β) :
has_basis (comap f l) (λ s : set β, s ∈ l) (λ s, f ⁻¹' s) :=
⟨λ t, mem_comap⟩
lemma has_basis.prod_self (hl : l.has_basis p s) :
(l ×ᶠ l).has_basis p (λ i, s i ×ˢ s i) :=
⟨begin
intro t,
apply mem_prod_iff.trans,
split,
{ rintros ⟨t₁, ht₁, t₂, ht₂, H⟩,
rcases hl.mem_iff.1 (inter_mem ht₁ ht₂) with ⟨i, hi, ht⟩,
exact ⟨i, hi, λ p ⟨hp₁, hp₂⟩, H ⟨(ht hp₁).1, (ht hp₂).2⟩⟩ },
{ rintros ⟨i, hi, H⟩,
exact ⟨s i, hl.mem_of_mem hi, s i, hl.mem_of_mem hi, H⟩ }
end⟩
lemma mem_prod_self_iff {s} : s ∈ l ×ᶠ l ↔ ∃ t ∈ l, t ×ˢ t ⊆ s :=
l.basis_sets.prod_self.mem_iff
lemma has_basis.forall_mem_mem (h : has_basis l p s) {x : α} :
(∀ t ∈ l, x ∈ t) ↔ ∀ i, p i → x ∈ s i :=
begin
simp only [h.mem_iff, exists_imp_distrib],
exact ⟨λ h i hi, h (s i) i hi subset.rfl, λ h t i hi ht, ht (h i hi)⟩
end
lemma has_basis.sInter_sets (h : has_basis l p s) :
⋂₀ l.sets = ⋂ i (hi : p i), s i :=
begin
ext x,
simp only [mem_Inter, mem_sInter, filter.mem_sets, h.forall_mem_mem],
end
variables {ι'' : Type*} [preorder ι''] (l) (s'' : ι'' → set α)
/-- `is_antitone_basis s` means the image of `s` is a filter basis such that `s` is decreasing. -/
@[protect_proj] structure is_antitone_basis extends is_basis (λ _, true) s'' : Prop :=
(antitone : antitone s'')
/-- We say that a filter `l` has an antitone basis `s : ι → set α`, if `t ∈ l` if and only if `t`
includes `s i` for some `i`, and `s` is decreasing. -/
@[protect_proj] structure has_antitone_basis (l : filter α) (s : ι'' → set α)
extends has_basis l (λ _, true) s : Prop :=
(antitone : antitone s)
end same_type
section two_types
variables {la : filter α} {pa : ι → Prop} {sa : ι → set α}
{lb : filter β} {pb : ι' → Prop} {sb : ι' → set β} {f : α → β}
lemma has_basis.tendsto_left_iff (hla : la.has_basis pa sa) :
tendsto f la lb ↔ ∀ t ∈ lb, ∃ i (hi : pa i), maps_to f (sa i) t :=
by { simp only [tendsto, (hla.map f).le_iff, image_subset_iff], refl }
lemma has_basis.tendsto_right_iff (hlb : lb.has_basis pb sb) :
tendsto f la lb ↔ ∀ i (hi : pb i), ∀ᶠ x in la, f x ∈ sb i :=
by simpa only [tendsto, hlb.ge_iff, mem_map, filter.eventually]
lemma has_basis.tendsto_iff (hla : la.has_basis pa sa) (hlb : lb.has_basis pb sb) :
tendsto f la lb ↔ ∀ ib (hib : pb ib), ∃ ia (hia : pa ia), ∀ x ∈ sa ia, f x ∈ sb ib :=
by simp [hlb.tendsto_right_iff, hla.eventually_iff]
lemma tendsto.basis_left (H : tendsto f la lb) (hla : la.has_basis pa sa) :
∀ t ∈ lb, ∃ i (hi : pa i), maps_to f (sa i) t :=
hla.tendsto_left_iff.1 H
lemma tendsto.basis_right (H : tendsto f la lb) (hlb : lb.has_basis pb sb) :
∀ i (hi : pb i), ∀ᶠ x in la, f x ∈ sb i :=
hlb.tendsto_right_iff.1 H
lemma tendsto.basis_both (H : tendsto f la lb) (hla : la.has_basis pa sa)
(hlb : lb.has_basis pb sb) :
∀ ib (hib : pb ib), ∃ ia (hia : pa ia), ∀ x ∈ sa ia, f x ∈ sb ib :=
(hla.tendsto_iff hlb).1 H
lemma has_basis.prod'' (hla : la.has_basis pa sa) (hlb : lb.has_basis pb sb) :
(la ×ᶠ lb).has_basis (λ i : pprod ι ι', pa i.1 ∧ pb i.2) (λ i, sa i.1 ×ˢ sb i.2) :=
(hla.comap prod.fst).inf' (hlb.comap prod.snd)
lemma has_basis.prod {ι ι' : Type*} {pa : ι → Prop} {sa : ι → set α} {pb : ι' → Prop}
{sb : ι' → set β} (hla : la.has_basis pa sa) (hlb : lb.has_basis pb sb) :
(la ×ᶠ lb).has_basis (λ i : ι × ι', pa i.1 ∧ pb i.2) (λ i, sa i.1 ×ˢ sb i.2) :=
(hla.comap prod.fst).inf (hlb.comap prod.snd)
lemma has_basis.prod' {la : filter α} {lb : filter β} {ι : Type*} {p : ι → Prop}
{sa : ι → set α} {sb : ι → set β}
(hla : la.has_basis p sa) (hlb : lb.has_basis p sb)
(h_dir : ∀ {i j}, p i → p j → ∃ k, p k ∧ sa k ⊆ sa i ∧ sb k ⊆ sb j) :
(la ×ᶠ lb).has_basis p (λ i, sa i ×ˢ sb i) :=
begin
simp only [has_basis_iff, (hla.prod hlb).mem_iff],
refine λ t, ⟨_, _⟩,
{ rintros ⟨⟨i, j⟩, ⟨hi, hj⟩, hsub : sa i ×ˢ sb j ⊆ t⟩,
rcases h_dir hi hj with ⟨k, hk, ki, kj⟩,
exact ⟨k, hk, (set.prod_mono ki kj).trans hsub⟩ },
{ rintro ⟨i, hi, h⟩,
exact ⟨⟨i, i⟩, ⟨hi, hi⟩, h⟩ },
end
lemma has_antitone_basis.prod {f : filter α} {g : filter β}
{s : ℕ → set α} {t : ℕ → set β} (hf : has_antitone_basis f s) (hg : has_antitone_basis g t) :
has_antitone_basis (f ×ᶠ g) (λ n, s n ×ˢ t n) :=
begin
have h : has_basis (f ×ᶠ g) _ _ := has_basis.prod' hf.to_has_basis hg.to_has_basis _,
swap,
{ intros i j,
simp only [true_and, forall_true_left],
exact ⟨max i j, hf.antitone (le_max_left _ _), hg.antitone (le_max_right _ _)⟩, },
refine ⟨h, λ n m hn_le_m, set.prod_mono _ _⟩,
exacts [hf.antitone hn_le_m, hg.antitone hn_le_m]
end
lemma has_basis.coprod {ι ι' : Type*} {pa : ι → Prop} {sa : ι → set α} {pb : ι' → Prop}
{sb : ι' → set β} (hla : la.has_basis pa sa) (hlb : lb.has_basis pb sb) :
(la.coprod lb).has_basis (λ i : ι × ι', pa i.1 ∧ pb i.2)
(λ i, prod.fst ⁻¹' sa i.1 ∪ prod.snd ⁻¹' sb i.2) :=
(hla.comap prod.fst).sup (hlb.comap prod.snd)
end two_types
lemma map_sigma_mk_comap {π : α → Type*} {π' : β → Type*} {f : α → β}
(hf : function.injective f) (g : Π a, π a → π' (f a)) (a : α) (l : filter (π' (f a))) :
map (sigma.mk a) (comap (g a) l) = comap (sigma.map f g) (map (sigma.mk (f a)) l) :=
begin
refine (((basis_sets _).comap _).map _).eq_of_same_basis _,
convert ((basis_sets _).map _).comap _,
ext1 s,
apply image_sigma_mk_preimage_sigma_map hf
end
end filter
end sort
namespace filter
variables {α β γ ι : Type*} {ι' : Sort*}
/-- `is_countably_generated f` means `f = generate s` for some countable `s`. -/
class is_countably_generated (f : filter α) : Prop :=
(out [] : ∃ s : set (set α), s.countable ∧ f = generate s)
/-- `is_countable_basis p s` means the image of `s` bounded by `p` is a countable filter basis. -/
structure is_countable_basis (p : ι → Prop) (s : ι → set α) extends is_basis p s : Prop :=
(countable : (set_of p).countable)
/-- We say that a filter `l` has a countable basis `s : ι → set α` bounded by `p : ι → Prop`,
if `t ∈ l` if and only if `t` includes `s i` for some `i` such that `p i`, and the set
defined by `p` is countable. -/
structure has_countable_basis (l : filter α) (p : ι → Prop) (s : ι → set α)
extends has_basis l p s : Prop :=
(countable : (set_of p).countable)
/-- A countable filter basis `B` on a type `α` is a nonempty countable collection of sets of `α`
such that the intersection of two elements of this collection contains some element
of the collection. -/
structure countable_filter_basis (α : Type*) extends filter_basis α :=
(countable : sets.countable)
-- For illustration purposes, the countable filter basis defining (at_top : filter ℕ)
instance nat.inhabited_countable_filter_basis : inhabited (countable_filter_basis ℕ) :=
⟨{ countable := countable_range (λ n, Ici n),
..(default : filter_basis ℕ) }⟩
lemma has_countable_basis.is_countably_generated {f : filter α} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → set α}
(h : f.has_countable_basis p s) :
f.is_countably_generated :=
⟨⟨{t | ∃ i, p i ∧ s i = t}, h.countable.image s, h.to_has_basis.eq_generate⟩⟩
lemma antitone_seq_of_seq (s : ℕ → set α) :
∃ t : ℕ → set α, antitone t ∧ (⨅ i, 𝓟 $ s i) = ⨅ i, 𝓟 (t i) :=
begin
use λ n, ⋂ m ≤ n, s m, split,
{ exact λ i j hij, bInter_mono (Iic_subset_Iic.2 hij) (λ n hn, subset.refl _) },
apply le_antisymm; rw le_infi_iff; intro i,
{ rw le_principal_iff, refine (bInter_mem (finite_le_nat _)).2 (λ j hji, _),
rw ← le_principal_iff, apply infi_le_of_le j _, exact le_rfl },
{ apply infi_le_of_le i _, rw principal_mono, intro a, simp, intro h, apply h, refl },
end
lemma countable_binfi_eq_infi_seq [complete_lattice α] {B : set ι} (Bcbl : B.countable)
(Bne : B.nonempty) (f : ι → α) :
∃ (x : ℕ → ι), (⨅ t ∈ B, f t) = ⨅ i, f (x i) :=
begin
rw countable_iff_exists_surjective_to_subtype Bne at Bcbl,
rcases Bcbl with ⟨g, gsurj⟩,
rw infi_subtype',
use (λ n, g n), apply le_antisymm; rw le_infi_iff,
{ intro i, apply infi_le_of_le (g i) _, apply le_rfl },
{ intros a, rcases gsurj a with ⟨i, rfl⟩, apply infi_le }
end
lemma countable_binfi_eq_infi_seq' [complete_lattice α] {B : set ι} (Bcbl : B.countable) (f : ι → α)
{i₀ : ι} (h : f i₀ = ⊤) :
∃ (x : ℕ → ι), (⨅ t ∈ B, f t) = ⨅ i, f (x i) :=
begin
cases B.eq_empty_or_nonempty with hB Bnonempty,
{ rw [hB, infi_emptyset],
use λ n, i₀,
simp [h] },
{ exact countable_binfi_eq_infi_seq Bcbl Bnonempty f }
end
lemma countable_binfi_principal_eq_seq_infi {B : set (set α)} (Bcbl : B.countable) :
∃ (x : ℕ → set α), (⨅ t ∈ B, 𝓟 t) = ⨅ i, 𝓟 (x i) :=
countable_binfi_eq_infi_seq' Bcbl 𝓟 principal_univ
section is_countably_generated
protected lemma has_antitone_basis.mem [preorder ι] {l : filter α} {s : ι → set α}
(hs : l.has_antitone_basis s) (i : ι) : s i ∈ l :=
hs.to_has_basis.mem_of_mem trivial
/-- If `f` is countably generated and `f.has_basis p s`, then `f` admits a decreasing basis
enumerated by natural numbers such that all sets have the form `s i`. More precisely, there is a
sequence `i n` such that `p (i n)` for all `n` and `s (i n)` is a decreasing sequence of sets which
forms a basis of `f`-/
lemma has_basis.exists_antitone_subbasis {f : filter α} [h : f.is_countably_generated]
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → set α} (hs : f.has_basis p s) :
∃ x : ℕ → ι', (∀ i, p (x i)) ∧ f.has_antitone_basis (λ i, s (x i)) :=
begin
obtain ⟨x', hx'⟩ : ∃ x : ℕ → set α, f = ⨅ i, 𝓟 (x i),
{ unfreezingI { rcases h with ⟨s, hsc, rfl⟩ },
rw generate_eq_binfi,
exact countable_binfi_principal_eq_seq_infi hsc },
have : ∀ i, x' i ∈ f := λ i, hx'.symm ▸ (infi_le (λ i, 𝓟 (x' i)) i) (mem_principal_self _),
let x : ℕ → {i : ι' // p i} := λ n, nat.rec_on n (hs.index _ $ this 0)
(λ n xn, (hs.index _ $ inter_mem (this $ n + 1) (hs.mem_of_mem xn.2))),
have x_mono : antitone (λ i, s (x i)),
{ refine antitone_nat_of_succ_le (λ i, _),
exact (hs.set_index_subset _).trans (inter_subset_right _ _) },
have x_subset : ∀ i, s (x i) ⊆ x' i,
{ rintro (_|i),
exacts [hs.set_index_subset _, subset.trans (hs.set_index_subset _) (inter_subset_left _ _)] },
refine ⟨λ i, x i, λ i, (x i).2, _⟩,
have : (⨅ i, 𝓟 (s (x i))).has_antitone_basis (λ i, s (x i)) :=
⟨has_basis_infi_principal (directed_of_sup x_mono), x_mono⟩,
convert this,
exact le_antisymm (le_infi $ λ i, le_principal_iff.2 $ by cases i; apply hs.set_index_mem)
(hx'.symm ▸ le_infi (λ i, le_principal_iff.2 $
this.to_has_basis.mem_iff.2 ⟨i, trivial, x_subset i⟩))
end
/-- A countably generated filter admits a basis formed by an antitone sequence of sets. -/
lemma exists_antitone_basis (f : filter α) [f.is_countably_generated] :
∃ x : ℕ → set α, f.has_antitone_basis x :=
let ⟨x, hxf, hx⟩ := f.basis_sets.exists_antitone_subbasis in ⟨x, hx⟩
lemma exists_antitone_seq (f : filter α) [f.is_countably_generated] :
∃ x : ℕ → set α, antitone x ∧ ∀ {s}, (s ∈ f ↔ ∃ i, x i ⊆ s) :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := f.exists_antitone_basis in
⟨x, hx.antitone, λ s, by simp [hx.to_has_basis.mem_iff]⟩
instance inf.is_countably_generated (f g : filter α) [is_countably_generated f]
[is_countably_generated g] :
is_countably_generated (f ⊓ g) :=
begin
rcases f.exists_antitone_basis with ⟨s, hs⟩,
rcases g.exists_antitone_basis with ⟨t, ht⟩,
exact has_countable_basis.is_countably_generated
⟨hs.to_has_basis.inf ht.to_has_basis, set.countable_encodable _⟩
end
instance comap.is_countably_generated (l : filter β) [l.is_countably_generated] (f : α → β) :
(comap f l).is_countably_generated :=
let ⟨x, hxl⟩ := l.exists_antitone_basis in
has_countable_basis.is_countably_generated ⟨hxl.to_has_basis.comap _, countable_encodable _⟩
instance sup.is_countably_generated (f g : filter α) [is_countably_generated f]
[is_countably_generated g] :
is_countably_generated (f ⊔ g) :=
begin
rcases f.exists_antitone_basis with ⟨s, hs⟩,
rcases g.exists_antitone_basis with ⟨t, ht⟩,
exact has_countable_basis.is_countably_generated
⟨hs.to_has_basis.sup ht.to_has_basis, set.countable_encodable _⟩
end
end is_countably_generated
@[instance] lemma is_countably_generated_seq [encodable β] (x : β → set α) :
is_countably_generated (⨅ i, 𝓟 $ x i) :=
begin
use [range x, countable_range x],
rw [generate_eq_binfi, infi_range]
end
lemma is_countably_generated_of_seq {f : filter α} (h : ∃ x : ℕ → set α, f = ⨅ i, 𝓟 $ x i) :
f.is_countably_generated :=
let ⟨x, h⟩ := h in by rw h ; apply is_countably_generated_seq
lemma is_countably_generated_binfi_principal {B : set $ set α} (h : B.countable) :
is_countably_generated (⨅ (s ∈ B), 𝓟 s) :=
is_countably_generated_of_seq (countable_binfi_principal_eq_seq_infi h)
lemma is_countably_generated_iff_exists_antitone_basis {f : filter α} :
is_countably_generated f ↔ ∃ x : ℕ → set α, f.has_antitone_basis x :=
begin
split,
{ introI h, exact f.exists_antitone_basis },
{ rintros ⟨x, h⟩,
rw h.to_has_basis.eq_infi,
exact is_countably_generated_seq x },
end
@[instance] lemma is_countably_generated_principal (s : set α) : is_countably_generated (𝓟 s) :=
is_countably_generated_of_seq ⟨λ _, s, infi_const.symm⟩
@[instance] lemma is_countably_generated_pure (a : α) : is_countably_generated (pure a) :=
by { rw ← principal_singleton, exact is_countably_generated_principal _, }
@[instance] lemma is_countably_generated_bot : is_countably_generated (⊥ : filter α) :=
@principal_empty α ▸ is_countably_generated_principal _
@[instance] lemma is_countably_generated_top : is_countably_generated (⊤ : filter α) :=
@principal_univ α ▸ is_countably_generated_principal _
instance is_countably_generated.prod {f : filter α} {g : filter β}
[hf : f.is_countably_generated] [hg : g.is_countably_generated] :
is_countably_generated (f ×ᶠ g) :=
begin
simp_rw is_countably_generated_iff_exists_antitone_basis at hf hg ⊢,
rcases hf with ⟨s, hs⟩,
rcases hg with ⟨t, ht⟩,
refine ⟨_, hs.prod ht⟩,
end
end filter
|
6667bf430c3d5bbafbc82fa4c1f9ad01c4fcc7bb | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/category_theory/monoidal/tor.lean | 9ea38314c8550689ff8af32a0a4e7f4c651b8138 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,924 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import category_theory.functor.left_derived
import category_theory.monoidal.preadditive
/-!
# Tor, the left-derived functor of tensor product
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
We define `Tor C n : C ⥤ C ⥤ C`, by left-deriving in the second factor of `(X, Y) ↦ X ⊗ Y`.
For now we have almost nothing to say about it!
It would be good to show that this is naturally isomorphic to the functor obtained
by left-deriving in the first factor, instead.
For now we define `Tor'` by left-deriving in the first factor,
but showing `Tor C n ≅ Tor' C n` will require a bit more theory!
Possibly it's best to axiomatize delta functors, and obtain a unique characterisation?
-/
noncomputable theory
open category_theory.limits
open category_theory.monoidal_category
namespace category_theory
variables {C : Type*} [category C] [monoidal_category C] [preadditive C] [monoidal_preadditive C]
[has_zero_object C] [has_equalizers C] [has_cokernels C] [has_images C] [has_image_maps C]
[has_projective_resolutions C]
variables (C)
/-- We define `Tor C n : C ⥤ C ⥤ C` by left-deriving in the second factor of `(X, Y) ↦ X ⊗ Y`. -/
@[simps]
def Tor (n : ℕ) : C ⥤ C ⥤ C :=
{ obj := λ X, functor.left_derived ((tensoring_left C).obj X) n,
map := λ X Y f, nat_trans.left_derived ((tensoring_left C).map f) n,
map_id' := λ X, by rw [(tensoring_left C).map_id, nat_trans.left_derived_id],
map_comp' := λ X Y Z f g, by rw [(tensoring_left C).map_comp, nat_trans.left_derived_comp], }
/-- An alternative definition of `Tor`, where we left-derive in the first factor instead. -/
@[simps]
def Tor' (n : ℕ) : C ⥤ C ⥤ C :=
functor.flip
{ obj := λ X, functor.left_derived ((tensoring_right C).obj X) n,
map := λ X Y f, nat_trans.left_derived ((tensoring_right C).map f) n,
map_id' := λ X, by rw [(tensoring_right C).map_id, nat_trans.left_derived_id],
map_comp' := λ X Y Z f g, by rw [(tensoring_right C).map_comp, nat_trans.left_derived_comp], }
open_locale zero_object
/-- The higher `Tor` groups for `X` and `Y` are zero if `Y` is projective. -/
def Tor_succ_of_projective (X Y : C) [projective Y] (n : ℕ) : ((Tor C (n + 1)).obj X).obj Y ≅ 0 :=
((tensoring_left C).obj X).left_derived_obj_projective_succ n Y
/-- The higher `Tor'` groups for `X` and `Y` are zero if `X` is projective. -/
def Tor'_succ_of_projective (X Y : C) [projective X] (n : ℕ) :
((Tor' C (n + 1)).obj X).obj Y ≅ 0 :=
-- This unfortunately needs a manual `dsimp`, to avoid a slow unification problem.
begin
dsimp only [Tor', functor.flip],
exact ((tensoring_right C).obj Y).left_derived_obj_projective_succ n X
end
end category_theory
assert_not_exists Module.abelian
|
e0cee1c8664fdeb90014f1ec8d5a9085ddd1f748 | a8a8012e62ebc4c8550b92736c0b20faab882ba0 | /yoneda_bug.hlean | 3cae14bc0ec481e3f521f09e83af2dc53f664513 | [] | no_license | fpvandoorn/Bergen-Lean | d02d173f79492498b0ee042ae6699a984108c6ef | 40638f1e04b6c681858127e85546c9012b62ab63 | refs/heads/master | 1,610,398,839,774 | 1,484,840,344,000 | 1,484,840,344,000 | 79,229,751 | 0 | 2 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,610 | hlean | --The following special case of the Yoneda lemma:
--If A -> X ~= B -> X for all X, then A ~= B
import types.equiv
import types.pointed
open pointed eq equiv is_equiv
set_option pp.all true
structure typeclass :=
(data : Type → Type)
namespace typeclass
structure obj.{u v} (C : typeclass.{u v}) : Type.{max (u+1) v} :=
(U : Type.{u})
(struct : data C U)
attribute obj.U [coercion]
end typeclass open typeclass
-- A "concrete infinity-category", a subcategory of the inf-category of types
-- An object consists of a type plus some data
-- The arrows are the 'good' maps
structure cCat.{u v w} extends CC:typeclass.{u v} : Type.{(max u v w)+1} :=
(good : Π (A B : obj CC) , (A → B) → Type.{w})
(idwd : Π (A : obj CC), good A A (λ x , x))
namespace cCat
variables {C : cCat}
structure arr (A B : obj C) :=
(to_fun : A → B)
(wd : good C A B to_fun)
infix ` →* `:30 := pmap
attribute to_fun [coercion]
definition id (A : obj C) : arr A A :=
arr.mk (λ x , x) (idwd C A)
structure cequiv.{u v w} {C : cCat.{u v w}} (A B : obj C) extends e:equiv.{u u} A B, arr A B : Type.{(max u v w)+1} :=
(wd_inv : good C B A e⁻¹ᵉ)
infix ` ≃* `:25 := cequiv
definition inv_inv {A B : Type} (e : A ≃ B) : e⁻¹⁻¹ = e :=
begin
apply eq_of_homotopy,
intro a,
exact equiv.to_inv_eq_of_eq _ (symm (to_left_inv e a))
end
protected definition cequiv.symm [symm] [constructor] {A B : obj C} (f : A ≃* B) : B ≃* A :=
begin
apply cequiv.mk,
{
exact cequiv.wd_inv f
},
{
esimp,
apply transport (good C A B),
rotate 1,
{
exact cequiv.wd f
},
{
symmetry,
apply inv_inv
}
}
end
end cCat open cCat
--Closed concrete infinity-category
structure ccCat.{u v} extends CC:cCat.{u v u} : Type.{(max u v)+1} :=
(closed : Π {A B : obj CC} , data (arr A B))
namespace ccCat
variables {C : ccCat}
definition hom (A B : obj C) : obj C := obj.mk (arr A B) (closed C)
definition deYonedify.{u v w} {C : ccCat.{u v}} {A B : obj C} (f : Π X, cequiv.{u v u} (hom A X) (hom B X)) : B → A :=
begin
refine @arr.to_fun C _ _ _,
apply equiv.to_fun (f A),
apply id
end
definition yoneda {A B : obj C} (e : Π X , hom A X ≃* hom B X) : A ≃* B :=
begin
fapply cequiv.mk,
{
apply deYonedify,
intro X,
apply cequiv.symm,
exact (e X)
},
{
},
{
}
end
definition pTypeC.{u} : ccCat.{u u u} :=
begin
fapply mk,
{
fapply cCat.mk,
{
exact λ A , A
},
{
intro A B f,
exact f (obj.struct A) = obj.struct B
},
{
intro A,
exact refl _
}
},
{
intro A B,
apply arr.mk,
exact refl _
}
end
namespace pointed
definition yoneda.{u} {A B : pType.{u}} (e : Π (X : pType.{u}) , (ppmap A X) ≃* (ppmap B X)) : A ≃* B :=
begin
fapply pequiv_of_equiv,
{
fapply equiv.mk,
{
apply ccCat.deYonedify pTypeC,
intro X,
apply to_equiv,
apply pequiv.symm,
exact (e X)
},
{ fapply is_equiv.mk,
{
apply Yonedable.deYonedify pTypeY,
intro X,
apply to_equiv,
exact (e X)
},
{
},
{
},
{
}
}
},
{
}
end
end pointed
|
2a6611a62135f8973e1796768db41011c837d61b | c055f4b7c29cf1aac2223bd8c1ac8d181a7c6447 | /src/categories/universal/default.lean | 73c03b223d2c669112ddd690f2667ec0c341dca0 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | rwbarton/lean-category-theory-pr | 77207b6674eeec1e258ec85dea58f3bff8d27065 | 591847d70c6a11c4d5561cd0eaf69b1fe85a70ab | refs/heads/master | 1,584,595,111,303 | 1,528,029,041,000 | 1,528,029,041,000 | 135,919,126 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,528,041,805,000 | 1,528,041,805,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,723 | lean | -- Copyright (c) 2017 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
-- Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-- Authors: Stephen Morgan, Scott Morrison
import .cones
open categories
open categories.functor
open categories.isomorphism
open categories.initial
open categories.types
namespace categories.universal
universes u v w
variables {C : Type u}
variables [𝒞 : category.{u v} C]
include 𝒞
variables {X Y : C}
structure Equalizer (f g : X ⟶ Y) :=
(equalizer : C)
(inclusion : equalizer ⟶ X)
(map : ∀ {Z : C} (k : Z ⟶ X) (w : k ≫ f = k ≫ g), Z ⟶ equalizer)
(witness : inclusion ≫ f = inclusion ≫ g . obviously)
(factorisation : ∀ {Z : C} (k : Z ⟶ X) (w : k ≫ f = k ≫ g), (map k w) ≫ inclusion = k . obviously)
(uniqueness : ∀ {Z : C} (a b : Z ⟶ equalizer) (witness : a ≫ inclusion = b ≫ inclusion), a = b . obviously)
make_lemma Equalizer.witness
make_lemma Equalizer.factorisation
make_lemma Equalizer.uniqueness
attribute [simp,ematch] Equalizer.factorisation_lemma
attribute [applicable] Equalizer.inclusion Equalizer.map
attribute [applicable] Equalizer.uniqueness_lemma
-- Or should we write out yet another structure, and prove it agrees with the equalizer?
definition Kernel [Z : ZeroObject C] (f : X ⟶ Y) := Equalizer f (Z.zero_morphism X Y)
structure BinaryProduct (X Y : C) :=
(product : C)
(left_projection : product ⟶ X)
(right_projection : product ⟶ Y)
(map : ∀ {Z : C} (f : Z ⟶ X) (g : Z ⟶ Y), Z ⟶ product)
(left_factorisation : ∀ {Z : C} (f : Z ⟶ X) (g : Z ⟶ Y), (map f g) ≫ left_projection = f . obviously)
(right_factorisation : ∀ {Z : C} (f : Z ⟶ X) (g : Z ⟶ Y), (map f g) ≫ right_projection = g . obviously)
(uniqueness : ∀ {Z : C} (f g : Z ⟶ product)
(left_witness : f ≫ left_projection = g ≫ left_projection )
(right_witness : f ≫ right_projection = g ≫ right_projection), f = g . obviously)
make_lemma BinaryProduct.left_factorisation
make_lemma BinaryProduct.right_factorisation
make_lemma BinaryProduct.uniqueness
attribute [simp,ematch] BinaryProduct.left_factorisation_lemma BinaryProduct.right_factorisation_lemma
attribute [applicable] BinaryProduct.left_projection BinaryProduct.right_projection BinaryProduct.map
attribute [applicable] BinaryProduct.uniqueness_lemma
structure Product {I : Type w} (F : I → C) :=
(product : C)
(projection : Π i : I, product ⟶ (F i))
(map : ∀ {Z : C} (f : Π i : I, Z ⟶ (F i)), Z ⟶ product)
(factorisation : ∀ {Z : C} (f : Π i : I, Z ⟶ (F i)) (i : I), (map f) ≫ (projection i) = f i . obviously)
(uniqueness : ∀ {Z : C} (f g : Z ⟶ product) (witness : ∀ i : I, f ≫ (projection i) = g ≫ (projection i)), f = g . obviously)
make_lemma Product.factorisation
make_lemma Product.uniqueness
attribute [simp,ematch] Product.factorisation_lemma
attribute [applicable] Product.projection Product.map
attribute [applicable] Product.uniqueness_lemma
structure Coequalizer (f g : X ⟶ Y) :=
(coequalizer : C)
(projection : Y ⟶ coequalizer)
(map : ∀ {Z : C} (k : Y ⟶ Z) (w : f ≫ k = g ≫ k), coequalizer ⟶ Z)
(witness : f ≫ projection = g ≫ projection . obviously)
(factorisation : ∀ {Z : C} (k : Y ⟶ Z) (w : f ≫ k = g ≫ k), projection ≫ (map k w) = k . obviously)
(uniqueness : ∀ {Z : C} (a b : coequalizer ⟶ Z) (witness : projection ≫ a = projection ≫ b), a = b . obviously)
make_lemma Coequalizer.witness
make_lemma Coequalizer.factorisation
make_lemma Coequalizer.uniqueness
attribute [simp,ematch] Coequalizer.factorisation_lemma
attribute [applicable] Coequalizer.projection Coequalizer.map
attribute [applicable] Coequalizer.uniqueness_lemma
definition Cokernel [Z : ZeroObject C] (f : X ⟶ Y) := Coequalizer f (Z.zero_morphism X Y)
structure BinaryCoproduct (X Y : C) :=
(coproduct : C)
(left_inclusion : X ⟶ coproduct)
(right_inclusion : Y ⟶ coproduct)
(map : ∀ {Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z), coproduct ⟶ Z)
(left_factorisation : ∀ {Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z), left_inclusion ≫ (map f g) = f . obviously)
(right_factorisation : ∀ {Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z), right_inclusion ≫ (map f g) = g . obviously)
(uniqueness : ∀ {Z : C} (f g : coproduct ⟶ Z)
(left_witness : left_inclusion ≫ f = left_inclusion ≫ g)
(right_witness : right_inclusion ≫ f = right_inclusion ≫ g), f = g . obviously)
make_lemma BinaryCoproduct.left_factorisation
make_lemma BinaryCoproduct.right_factorisation
make_lemma BinaryCoproduct.uniqueness
attribute [simp,ematch] BinaryCoproduct.left_factorisation_lemma BinaryCoproduct.right_factorisation_lemma
attribute [applicable] BinaryCoproduct.left_inclusion BinaryCoproduct.right_inclusion BinaryCoproduct.map
attribute [applicable] BinaryCoproduct.uniqueness_lemma
structure Coproduct {I : Type w} (X : I → C) :=
(coproduct : C)
(inclusion : Π i : I, (X i) ⟶ coproduct)
(map : ∀ {Z : C} (f : Π i : I, (X i) ⟶ Z), coproduct ⟶ Z)
(factorisation : ∀ {Z : C} (f : Π i : I, (X i) ⟶ Z) (i : I), (inclusion i) ≫ (map f) = f i . obviously)
(uniqueness : ∀ {Z : C} (f g : coproduct ⟶ Z) (witness : ∀ i : I, (inclusion i) ≫ f = (inclusion i) ≫ g), f = g . obviously)
-- Coming in later PRs: all these things are unique up to unique isomorphism, and are special cases of (co)limits.
end categories.universal
|
c441db91f9252ffd2524570af661a3e358a11015 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/order/bounded.lean | b7e2634a12a816f54ad978a93f6aeef5aa22c32c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,049 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Violeta Hernández Palacios. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import order.rel_classes
import data.set.intervals.basic
/-!
# Bounded and unbounded sets
We prove miscellaneous lemmas about bounded and unbounded sets. Many of these are just variations on
the same ideas, or similar results with a few minor differences. The file is divided into these
different general ideas.
-/
namespace set
variables {α : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop} {s t : set α}
/-! ### Subsets of bounded and unbounded sets -/
theorem bounded.mono (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : bounded r t) : bounded r s :=
hs.imp $ λ a ha b hb, ha b (hst hb)
theorem unbounded.mono (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : unbounded r s) : unbounded r t :=
λ a, let ⟨b, hb, hb'⟩ := hs a in ⟨b, hst hb, hb'⟩
/-! ### Alternate characterizations of unboundedness on orders -/
lemma unbounded_le_of_forall_exists_lt [preorder α] (h : ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ s, a < b) : unbounded (≤) s :=
λ a, let ⟨b, hb, hb'⟩ := h a in ⟨b, hb, λ hba, hba.not_lt hb'⟩
lemma unbounded_le_iff [linear_order α] : unbounded (≤) s ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ s, a < b :=
by simp only [unbounded, not_le]
lemma unbounded_lt_of_forall_exists_le [preorder α] (h : ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ s, a ≤ b) : unbounded (<) s :=
λ a, let ⟨b, hb, hb'⟩ := h a in ⟨b, hb, λ hba, hba.not_le hb'⟩
lemma unbounded_lt_iff [linear_order α] : unbounded (<) s ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ s, a ≤ b :=
by simp only [unbounded, not_lt]
lemma unbounded_ge_of_forall_exists_gt [preorder α] (h : ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ s, b < a) : unbounded (≥) s :=
@unbounded_le_of_forall_exists_lt αᵒᵈ _ _ h
lemma unbounded_ge_iff [linear_order α] : unbounded (≥) s ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ s, b < a :=
⟨λ h a, let ⟨b, hb, hba⟩ := h a in ⟨b, hb, lt_of_not_ge hba⟩, unbounded_ge_of_forall_exists_gt⟩
lemma unbounded_gt_of_forall_exists_ge [preorder α] (h : ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ s, b ≤ a) : unbounded (>) s :=
λ a, let ⟨b, hb, hb'⟩ := h a in ⟨b, hb, λ hba, not_le_of_gt hba hb'⟩
lemma unbounded_gt_iff [linear_order α] : unbounded (>) s ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ s, b ≤ a :=
⟨λ h a, let ⟨b, hb, hba⟩ := h a in ⟨b, hb, le_of_not_gt hba⟩, unbounded_gt_of_forall_exists_ge⟩
/-! ### Relation between boundedness by strict and nonstrict orders. -/
/-! #### Less and less or equal -/
lemma bounded.rel_mono {r' : α → α → Prop} (h : bounded r s) (hrr' : r ≤ r') : bounded r' s :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := h in ⟨a, λ b hb, hrr' b a (ha b hb)⟩
lemma bounded_le_of_bounded_lt [preorder α] (h : bounded (<) s) : bounded (≤) s :=
h.rel_mono $ λ _ _, le_of_lt
lemma unbounded.rel_mono {r' : α → α → Prop} (hr : r' ≤ r) (h : unbounded r s) : unbounded r' s :=
λ a, let ⟨b, hb, hba⟩ := h a in ⟨b, hb, λ hba', hba (hr b a hba')⟩
lemma unbounded_lt_of_unbounded_le [preorder α] (h : unbounded (≤) s) :
unbounded (<) s :=
h.rel_mono $ λ _ _, le_of_lt
lemma bounded_le_iff_bounded_lt [preorder α] [no_max_order α] : bounded (≤) s ↔ bounded (<) s :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, bounded_le_of_bounded_lt⟩,
cases h with a ha,
cases exists_gt a with b hb,
exact ⟨b, λ c hc, lt_of_le_of_lt (ha c hc) hb⟩
end
lemma unbounded_lt_iff_unbounded_le [preorder α] [no_max_order α] :
unbounded (<) s ↔ unbounded (≤) s :=
by simp_rw [← not_bounded_iff, bounded_le_iff_bounded_lt]
/-! #### Greater and greater or equal -/
lemma bounded_ge_of_bounded_gt [preorder α] (h : bounded (>) s) : bounded (≥) s :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := h in ⟨a, λ b hb, le_of_lt (ha b hb)⟩
lemma unbounded_gt_of_unbounded_ge [preorder α] (h : unbounded (≥) s) : unbounded (>) s :=
λ a, let ⟨b, hb, hba⟩ := h a in ⟨b, hb, λ hba', hba (le_of_lt hba')⟩
lemma bounded_ge_iff_bounded_gt [preorder α] [no_min_order α] : bounded (≥) s ↔ bounded (>) s :=
@bounded_le_iff_bounded_lt αᵒᵈ _ _ _
lemma unbounded_gt_iff_unbounded_ge [preorder α] [no_min_order α] :
unbounded (>) s ↔ unbounded (≥) s :=
@unbounded_lt_iff_unbounded_le αᵒᵈ _ _ _
/-! ### The universal set -/
theorem unbounded_le_univ [has_le α] [no_top_order α] : unbounded (≤) (@set.univ α) :=
λ a, let ⟨b, hb⟩ := exists_not_le a in ⟨b, ⟨⟩, hb⟩
theorem unbounded_lt_univ [preorder α] [no_top_order α] : unbounded (<) (@set.univ α) :=
unbounded_lt_of_unbounded_le unbounded_le_univ
theorem unbounded_ge_univ [has_le α] [no_bot_order α] : unbounded (≥) (@set.univ α) :=
λ a, let ⟨b, hb⟩ := exists_not_ge a in ⟨b, ⟨⟩, hb⟩
theorem unbounded_gt_univ [preorder α] [no_bot_order α] : unbounded (>) (@set.univ α) :=
unbounded_gt_of_unbounded_ge unbounded_ge_univ
/-! ### Bounded and unbounded intervals -/
theorem bounded_self (a : α) : bounded r {b | r b a} :=
⟨a, λ x, id⟩
/-! #### Half-open bounded intervals -/
theorem bounded_lt_Iio [preorder α] (a : α) : bounded (<) (set.Iio a) :=
bounded_self a
theorem bounded_le_Iio [preorder α] (a : α) : bounded (≤) (set.Iio a) :=
bounded_le_of_bounded_lt (bounded_lt_Iio a)
theorem bounded_le_Iic [preorder α] (a : α) : bounded (≤) (set.Iic a) :=
bounded_self a
theorem bounded_lt_Iic [preorder α] [no_max_order α] (a : α) : bounded (<) (set.Iic a) :=
by simp only [← bounded_le_iff_bounded_lt, bounded_le_Iic]
theorem bounded_gt_Ioi [preorder α] (a : α) : bounded (>) (set.Ioi a) :=
bounded_self a
theorem bounded_ge_Ioi [preorder α] (a : α) : bounded (≥) (set.Ioi a) :=
bounded_ge_of_bounded_gt (bounded_gt_Ioi a)
theorem bounded_ge_Ici [preorder α] (a : α) : bounded (≥) (set.Ici a) :=
bounded_self a
theorem bounded_gt_Ici [preorder α] [no_min_order α] (a : α) : bounded (>) (set.Ici a) :=
by simp only [← bounded_ge_iff_bounded_gt, bounded_ge_Ici]
/-! #### Other bounded intervals -/
theorem bounded_lt_Ioo [preorder α] (a b : α) : bounded (<) (set.Ioo a b) :=
(bounded_lt_Iio b).mono set.Ioo_subset_Iio_self
theorem bounded_lt_Ico [preorder α] (a b : α) : bounded (<) (set.Ico a b) :=
(bounded_lt_Iio b).mono set.Ico_subset_Iio_self
theorem bounded_lt_Ioc [preorder α] [no_max_order α] (a b : α) : bounded (<) (set.Ioc a b) :=
(bounded_lt_Iic b).mono set.Ioc_subset_Iic_self
theorem bounded_lt_Icc [preorder α] [no_max_order α] (a b : α) : bounded (<) (set.Icc a b) :=
(bounded_lt_Iic b).mono set.Icc_subset_Iic_self
theorem bounded_le_Ioo [preorder α] (a b : α) : bounded (≤) (set.Ioo a b) :=
(bounded_le_Iio b).mono set.Ioo_subset_Iio_self
theorem bounded_le_Ico [preorder α] (a b : α) : bounded (≤) (set.Ico a b) :=
(bounded_le_Iio b).mono set.Ico_subset_Iio_self
theorem bounded_le_Ioc [preorder α] (a b : α) : bounded (≤) (set.Ioc a b) :=
(bounded_le_Iic b).mono set.Ioc_subset_Iic_self
theorem bounded_le_Icc [preorder α] (a b : α) : bounded (≤) (set.Icc a b) :=
(bounded_le_Iic b).mono set.Icc_subset_Iic_self
theorem bounded_gt_Ioo [preorder α] (a b : α) : bounded (>) (set.Ioo a b) :=
(bounded_gt_Ioi a).mono set.Ioo_subset_Ioi_self
theorem bounded_gt_Ioc [preorder α] (a b : α) : bounded (>) (set.Ioc a b) :=
(bounded_gt_Ioi a).mono set.Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
theorem bounded_gt_Ico [preorder α] [no_min_order α] (a b : α) : bounded (>) (set.Ico a b) :=
(bounded_gt_Ici a).mono set.Ico_subset_Ici_self
theorem bounded_gt_Icc [preorder α] [no_min_order α] (a b : α) : bounded (>) (set.Icc a b) :=
(bounded_gt_Ici a).mono set.Icc_subset_Ici_self
theorem bounded_ge_Ioo [preorder α] (a b : α) : bounded (≥) (set.Ioo a b) :=
(bounded_ge_Ioi a).mono set.Ioo_subset_Ioi_self
theorem bounded_ge_Ioc [preorder α] (a b : α) : bounded (≥) (set.Ioc a b) :=
(bounded_ge_Ioi a).mono set.Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
theorem bounded_ge_Ico [preorder α] (a b : α) : bounded (≥) (set.Ico a b) :=
(bounded_ge_Ici a).mono set.Ico_subset_Ici_self
theorem bounded_ge_Icc [preorder α] (a b : α) : bounded (≥) (set.Icc a b) :=
(bounded_ge_Ici a).mono set.Icc_subset_Ici_self
/-! #### Unbounded intervals -/
theorem unbounded_le_Ioi [semilattice_sup α] [no_max_order α] (a : α) : unbounded (≤) (set.Ioi a) :=
λ b, let ⟨c, hc⟩ := exists_gt (a ⊔ b) in
⟨c, le_sup_left.trans_lt hc, (le_sup_right.trans_lt hc).not_le⟩
theorem unbounded_le_Ici [semilattice_sup α] [no_max_order α] (a : α) : unbounded (≤) (set.Ici a) :=
(unbounded_le_Ioi a).mono set.Ioi_subset_Ici_self
theorem unbounded_lt_Ioi [semilattice_sup α] [no_max_order α] (a : α) : unbounded (<) (set.Ioi a) :=
unbounded_lt_of_unbounded_le (unbounded_le_Ioi a)
theorem unbounded_lt_Ici [semilattice_sup α] (a : α) : unbounded (<) (set.Ici a) :=
λ b, ⟨a ⊔ b, le_sup_left, le_sup_right.not_lt⟩
/-! ### Bounded initial segments -/
theorem bounded_inter_not (H : ∀ a b, ∃ m, ∀ c, r c a ∨ r c b → r c m) (a : α) :
bounded r (s ∩ {b | ¬ r b a}) ↔ bounded r s :=
begin
refine ⟨_, bounded.mono (set.inter_subset_left s _)⟩,
rintro ⟨b, hb⟩,
cases H a b with m hm,
exact ⟨m, λ c hc, hm c (or_iff_not_imp_left.2 (λ hca, (hb c ⟨hc, hca⟩)))⟩
end
theorem unbounded_inter_not (H : ∀ a b, ∃ m, ∀ c, r c a ∨ r c b → r c m) (a : α) :
unbounded r (s ∩ {b | ¬ r b a}) ↔ unbounded r s :=
by simp_rw [← not_bounded_iff, bounded_inter_not H]
/-! #### Less or equal -/
theorem bounded_le_inter_not_le [semilattice_sup α] (a : α) :
bounded (≤) (s ∩ {b | ¬ b ≤ a}) ↔ bounded (≤) s :=
bounded_inter_not (λ x y, ⟨x ⊔ y, λ z h, h.elim le_sup_of_le_left le_sup_of_le_right⟩) a
theorem unbounded_le_inter_not_le [semilattice_sup α] (a : α) :
unbounded (≤) (s ∩ {b | ¬ b ≤ a}) ↔ unbounded (≤) s :=
begin
rw [←not_bounded_iff, ←not_bounded_iff, not_iff_not],
exact bounded_le_inter_not_le a
end
theorem bounded_le_inter_lt [linear_order α] (a : α) :
bounded (≤) (s ∩ {b | a < b}) ↔ bounded (≤) s :=
by simp_rw [← not_le, bounded_le_inter_not_le]
theorem unbounded_le_inter_lt [linear_order α] (a : α) :
unbounded (≤) (s ∩ {b | a < b}) ↔ unbounded (≤) s :=
by { convert unbounded_le_inter_not_le a, ext, exact lt_iff_not_le }
theorem bounded_le_inter_le [linear_order α] (a : α) :
bounded (≤) (s ∩ {b | a ≤ b}) ↔ bounded (≤) s :=
begin
refine ⟨_, bounded.mono (set.inter_subset_left s _)⟩,
rw ←@bounded_le_inter_lt _ s _ a,
exact bounded.mono (λ x ⟨hx, hx'⟩, ⟨hx, le_of_lt hx'⟩)
end
theorem unbounded_le_inter_le [linear_order α] (a : α) :
unbounded (≤) (s ∩ {b | a ≤ b}) ↔ unbounded (≤) s :=
begin
rw [←not_bounded_iff, ←not_bounded_iff, not_iff_not],
exact bounded_le_inter_le a
end
/-! #### Less than -/
theorem bounded_lt_inter_not_lt [semilattice_sup α] (a : α) :
bounded (<) (s ∩ {b | ¬ b < a}) ↔ bounded (<) s :=
bounded_inter_not (λ x y, ⟨x ⊔ y, λ z h, h.elim lt_sup_of_lt_left lt_sup_of_lt_right⟩) a
theorem unbounded_lt_inter_not_lt [semilattice_sup α] (a : α) :
unbounded (<) (s ∩ {b | ¬ b < a}) ↔ unbounded (<) s :=
begin
rw [←not_bounded_iff, ←not_bounded_iff, not_iff_not],
exact bounded_lt_inter_not_lt a
end
theorem bounded_lt_inter_le [linear_order α] (a : α) :
bounded (<) (s ∩ {b | a ≤ b}) ↔ bounded (<) s :=
by { convert bounded_lt_inter_not_lt a, ext, exact not_lt.symm }
theorem unbounded_lt_inter_le [linear_order α] (a : α) :
unbounded (<) (s ∩ {b | a ≤ b}) ↔ unbounded (<) s :=
by { convert unbounded_lt_inter_not_lt a, ext, exact not_lt.symm }
theorem bounded_lt_inter_lt [linear_order α] [no_max_order α] (a : α) :
bounded (<) (s ∩ {b | a < b}) ↔ bounded (<) s :=
begin
rw [←bounded_le_iff_bounded_lt, ←bounded_le_iff_bounded_lt],
exact bounded_le_inter_lt a
end
theorem unbounded_lt_inter_lt [linear_order α] [no_max_order α] (a : α) :
unbounded (<) (s ∩ {b | a < b}) ↔ unbounded (<) s :=
begin
rw [←not_bounded_iff, ←not_bounded_iff, not_iff_not],
exact bounded_lt_inter_lt a
end
/-! #### Greater or equal -/
theorem bounded_ge_inter_not_ge [semilattice_inf α] (a : α) :
bounded (≥) (s ∩ {b | ¬ a ≤ b}) ↔ bounded (≥) s :=
@bounded_le_inter_not_le αᵒᵈ s _ a
theorem unbounded_ge_inter_not_ge [semilattice_inf α] (a : α) :
unbounded (≥) (s ∩ {b | ¬ a ≤ b}) ↔ unbounded (≥) s :=
@unbounded_le_inter_not_le αᵒᵈ s _ a
theorem bounded_ge_inter_gt [linear_order α] (a : α) :
bounded (≥) (s ∩ {b | b < a}) ↔ bounded (≥) s :=
@bounded_le_inter_lt αᵒᵈ s _ a
theorem unbounded_ge_inter_gt [linear_order α] (a : α) :
unbounded (≥) (s ∩ {b | b < a}) ↔ unbounded (≥) s :=
@unbounded_le_inter_lt αᵒᵈ s _ a
theorem bounded_ge_inter_ge [linear_order α] (a : α) :
bounded (≥) (s ∩ {b | b ≤ a}) ↔ bounded (≥) s :=
@bounded_le_inter_le αᵒᵈ s _ a
theorem unbounded_ge_iff_unbounded_inter_ge [linear_order α] (a : α) :
unbounded (≥) (s ∩ {b | b ≤ a}) ↔ unbounded (≥) s :=
@unbounded_le_inter_le αᵒᵈ s _ a
/-! #### Greater than -/
theorem bounded_gt_inter_not_gt [semilattice_inf α] (a : α) :
bounded (>) (s ∩ {b | ¬ a < b}) ↔ bounded (>) s :=
@bounded_lt_inter_not_lt αᵒᵈ s _ a
theorem unbounded_gt_inter_not_gt [semilattice_inf α] (a : α) :
unbounded (>) (s ∩ {b | ¬ a < b}) ↔ unbounded (>) s :=
@unbounded_lt_inter_not_lt αᵒᵈ s _ a
theorem bounded_gt_inter_ge [linear_order α] (a : α) :
bounded (>) (s ∩ {b | b ≤ a}) ↔ bounded (>) s :=
@bounded_lt_inter_le αᵒᵈ s _ a
theorem unbounded_inter_ge [linear_order α] (a : α) :
unbounded (>) (s ∩ {b | b ≤ a}) ↔ unbounded (>) s :=
@unbounded_lt_inter_le αᵒᵈ s _ a
theorem bounded_gt_inter_gt [linear_order α] [no_min_order α] (a : α) :
bounded (>) (s ∩ {b | b < a}) ↔ bounded (>) s :=
@bounded_lt_inter_lt αᵒᵈ s _ _ a
theorem unbounded_gt_inter_gt [linear_order α] [no_min_order α] (a : α) :
unbounded (>) (s ∩ {b | b < a}) ↔ unbounded (>) s :=
@unbounded_lt_inter_lt αᵒᵈ s _ _ a
end set
|
1f026041777145a8bf08cc1279a819381cadd448 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/heapSort.lean | a92bcca95af20d3558024e987706ab971b1b6324 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,800 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
/-- A max-heap data structure. -/
structure BinaryHeap (α) (lt : α → α → Bool) where
arr : Array α
namespace BinaryHeap
/-- Core operation for binary heaps, expressed directly on arrays.
Given an array which is a max-heap, push item `i` down to restore the max-heap property. -/
def heapifyDown (lt : α → α → Bool) (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) :
{a' : Array α // a'.size = a.size} :=
let left := 2 * i.1 + 1
let right := left + 1
have left_le : i ≤ left := Nat.le_trans
(by rw [Nat.succ_mul, Nat.one_mul]; exact Nat.le_add_left i i)
(Nat.le_add_right ..)
have right_le : i ≤ right := Nat.le_trans left_le (Nat.le_add_right ..)
have i_le : i ≤ i := Nat.le_refl _
have j : {j : Fin a.size // i ≤ j} := if h : left < a.size then
if lt (a.get i) (a.get ⟨left, h⟩) then ⟨⟨left, h⟩, left_le⟩ else ⟨i, i_le⟩ else ⟨i, i_le⟩
have j := if h : right < a.size then
if lt (a.get j) (a.get ⟨right, h⟩) then ⟨⟨right, h⟩, right_le⟩ else j else j
if h : i.1 = j then ⟨a, rfl⟩ else
let a' := a.swap i j
let j' := ⟨j, by rw [a.size_swap i j]; exact j.1.2⟩
have : a'.size - j < a.size - i := by
rw [a.size_swap i j]; sorry
let ⟨a₂, h₂⟩ := heapifyDown lt a' j'
⟨a₂, h₂.trans (a.size_swap i j)⟩
termination_by _ => a.size - i
decreasing_by assumption
@[simp] theorem size_heapifyDown (lt : α → α → Bool) (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) :
(heapifyDown lt a i).1.size = a.size := (heapifyDown lt a i).2
/-- Core operation for binary heaps, expressed directly on arrays.
Construct a heap from an unsorted array, by heapifying all the elements. -/
def mkHeap (lt : α → α → Bool) (a : Array α) : {a' : Array α // a'.size = a.size} :=
let rec loop : (i : Nat) → (a : Array α) → i ≤ a.size → {a' : Array α // a'.size = a.size}
| 0, a, _ => ⟨a, rfl⟩
| i+1, a, h =>
let h := Nat.lt_of_succ_le h
let a' := heapifyDown lt a ⟨i, h⟩
let ⟨a₂, h₂⟩ := loop i a' ((heapifyDown ..).2.symm ▸ Nat.le_of_lt h)
⟨a₂, h₂.trans a'.2⟩
loop (a.size / 2) a sorry
@[simp] theorem size_mkHeap (lt : α → α → Bool) (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) :
(mkHeap lt a).1.size = a.size := (mkHeap lt a).2
/-- Core operation for binary heaps, expressed directly on arrays.
Given an array which is a max-heap, push item `i` up to restore the max-heap property. -/
def heapifyUp (lt : α → α → Bool) (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) :
{a' : Array α // a'.size = a.size} :=
if i0 : i.1 = 0 then ⟨a, rfl⟩ else
have : (i.1 - 1) / 2 < i := sorry
let j := ⟨(i.1 - 1) / 2, Nat.lt_trans this i.2⟩
if lt (a.get j) (a.get i) then
let a' := a.swap i j
let ⟨a₂, h₂⟩ := heapifyUp lt a' ⟨j.1, by rw [a.size_swap i j]; exact j.2⟩
⟨a₂, h₂.trans (a.size_swap i j)⟩
else ⟨a, rfl⟩
termination_by _ => i.1
decreasing_by assumption
@[simp] theorem size_heapifyUp (lt : α → α → Bool) (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) :
(heapifyUp lt a i).1.size = a.size := (heapifyUp lt a i).2
/-- `O(1)`. Build a new empty heap. -/
def empty (lt) : BinaryHeap α lt := ⟨#[]⟩
instance (lt) : Inhabited (BinaryHeap α lt) := ⟨empty _⟩
instance (lt) : EmptyCollection (BinaryHeap α lt) := ⟨empty _⟩
/-- `O(1)`. Build a one-element heap. -/
def singleton (lt) (x : α) : BinaryHeap α lt := ⟨#[x]⟩
/-- `O(1)`. Get the number of elements in a `BinaryHeap`. -/
def size {lt} (self : BinaryHeap α lt) : Nat := self.1.size
/-- `O(1)`. Get an element in the heap by index. -/
def get {lt} (self : BinaryHeap α lt) (i : Fin self.size) : α := self.1.get i
/-- `O(log n)`. Insert an element into a `BinaryHeap`, preserving the max-heap property. -/
def insert {lt} (self : BinaryHeap α lt) (x : α) : BinaryHeap α lt where
arr := let n := self.size;
heapifyUp lt (self.1.push x) ⟨n, by rw [Array.size_push]; apply Nat.lt_succ_self⟩
@[simp] theorem size_insert {lt} (self : BinaryHeap α lt) (x : α) :
(self.insert x).size = self.size + 1 := by
simp [insert, size, size_heapifyUp]
/-- `O(1)`. Get the maximum element in a `BinaryHeap`. -/
def max {lt} (self : BinaryHeap α lt) : Option α := self.1.get? 0
/-- Auxiliary for `popMax`. -/
def popMaxAux {lt} (self : BinaryHeap α lt) : {a' : BinaryHeap α lt // a'.size = self.size - 1} :=
match e: self.1.size with
| 0 => ⟨self, by simp [size, e]⟩
| n+1 =>
have h0 := by rw [e]; apply Nat.succ_pos
have hn := by rw [e]; apply Nat.lt_succ_self
if hn0 : 0 < n then
let a := self.1.swap ⟨0, h0⟩ ⟨n, hn⟩ |>.pop
⟨⟨heapifyDown lt a ⟨0, sorry⟩⟩,
by simp [size]⟩
else
⟨⟨self.1.pop⟩, by simp [size]⟩
/-- `O(log n)`. Remove the maximum element from a `BinaryHeap`.
Call `max` first to actually retrieve the maximum element. -/
def popMax {lt} (self : BinaryHeap α lt) : BinaryHeap α lt := self.popMaxAux
@[simp] theorem size_popMax {lt} (self : BinaryHeap α lt) :
self.popMax.size = self.size - 1 := self.popMaxAux.2
/-- `O(log n)`. Return and remove the maximum element from a `BinaryHeap`. -/
def extractMax {lt} (self : BinaryHeap α lt) : Option α × BinaryHeap α lt :=
(self.max, self.popMax)
theorem size_pos_of_max {lt} {self : BinaryHeap α lt} (e : self.max = some x) : 0 < self.size :=
Decidable.of_not_not fun h: ¬ 0 < self.1.size => by simp [BinaryHeap.max, Array.get?, h] at e
/-- `O(log n)`. Equivalent to `extractMax (self.insert x)`, except that extraction cannot fail. -/
def insertExtractMax {lt} (self : BinaryHeap α lt) (x : α) : α × BinaryHeap α lt :=
match e: self.max with
| none => (x, self)
| some m =>
if lt x m then
let a := self.1.set ⟨0, size_pos_of_max e⟩ x
(m, ⟨heapifyDown lt a ⟨0, by simp; exact size_pos_of_max e⟩⟩)
else (x, self)
/-- `O(log n)`. Equivalent to `(self.max, self.popMax.insert x)`. -/
def replaceMax {lt} (self : BinaryHeap α lt) (x : α) : Option α × BinaryHeap α lt :=
match e: self.max with
| none => (none, ⟨self.1.push x⟩)
| some m =>
let a := self.1.set ⟨0, size_pos_of_max e⟩ x
(some m, ⟨heapifyDown lt a ⟨0, by simp; exact size_pos_of_max e⟩⟩)
/-- `O(log n)`. Replace the value at index `i` by `x`. Assumes that `x ≤ self.get i`. -/
def decreaseKey {lt} (self : BinaryHeap α lt) (i : Fin self.size) (x : α) : BinaryHeap α lt where
arr := heapifyDown lt (self.1.set i x) ⟨i, by rw [self.1.size_set]; exact i.2⟩
/-- `O(log n)`. Replace the value at index `i` by `x`. Assumes that `self.get i ≤ x`. -/
def increaseKey {lt} (self : BinaryHeap α lt) (i : Fin self.size) (x : α) : BinaryHeap α lt where
arr := heapifyUp lt (self.1.set i x) ⟨i, by rw [self.1.size_set]; exact i.2⟩
end BinaryHeap
/-- `O(n)`. Convert an unsorted array to a `BinaryHeap`. -/
def Array.toBinaryHeap (lt : α → α → Bool) (a : Array α) : BinaryHeap α lt where
arr := BinaryHeap.mkHeap lt a
/-- `O(n log n)`. Sort an array using a `BinaryHeap`. -/
@[specialize] def Array.heapSort (a : Array α) (lt : α → α → Bool) : Array α :=
let gt y x := lt x y
let rec loop (a : BinaryHeap α gt) (out : Array α) : Array α :=
match e:a.max with
| none => out
| some x =>
have : a.popMax.size < a.size := by
simp; exact Nat.sub_lt (BinaryHeap.size_pos_of_max e) Nat.zero_lt_one
loop a.popMax (out.push x)
loop (a.toBinaryHeap gt) #[]
termination_by _ => a.size
decreasing_by assumption
attribute [simp] Array.heapSort.loop
#check Array.heapSort.loop._eq_1
attribute [simp] BinaryHeap.heapifyDown
|
22587435d56b43d5012fdeaae42057867c1939c6 | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/category_theory/limits/shapes/biproducts.lean | 91e712e77d37831caaa89c2dc974f46bc769f4aa | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 69,327 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Jakob von Raumer
-/
import algebra.group.ext
import category_theory.limits.shapes.finite_products
import category_theory.limits.shapes.binary_products
import category_theory.preadditive
import category_theory.limits.shapes.kernels
/-!
# Biproducts and binary biproducts
We introduce the notion of (finite) biproducts and binary biproducts.
These are slightly unusual relative to the other shapes in the library,
as they are simultaneously limits and colimits.
(Zero objects are similar; they are "biterminal".)
We treat first the case of a general category with zero morphisms,
and subsequently the case of a preadditive category.
In a category with zero morphisms, we model the (binary) biproduct of `P Q : C`
using a `binary_bicone`, which has a cone point `X`,
and morphisms `fst : X ⟶ P`, `snd : X ⟶ Q`, `inl : P ⟶ X` and `inr : X ⟶ Q`,
such that `inl ≫ fst = 𝟙 P`, `inl ≫ snd = 0`, `inr ≫ fst = 0`, and `inr ≫ snd = 𝟙 Q`.
Such a `binary_bicone` is a biproduct if the cone is a limit cone, and the cocone is a colimit
cocone.
In a preadditive category,
* any `binary_biproduct` satisfies `total : fst ≫ inl + snd ≫ inr = 𝟙 X`
* any `binary_product` is a `binary_biproduct`
* any `binary_coproduct` is a `binary_biproduct`
For biproducts indexed by a `fintype J`, a `bicone` again consists of a cone point `X`
and morphisms `π j : X ⟶ F j` and `ι j : F j ⟶ X` for each `j`,
such that `ι j ≫ π j'` is the identity when `j = j'` and zero otherwise.
In a preadditive category,
* any `biproduct` satisfies `total : ∑ j : J, biproduct.π f j ≫ biproduct.ι f j = 𝟙 (⨁ f)`
* any `product` is a `biproduct`
* any `coproduct` is a `biproduct`
## Notation
As `⊕` is already taken for the sum of types, we introduce the notation `X ⊞ Y` for
a binary biproduct. We introduce `⨁ f` for the indexed biproduct.
-/
noncomputable theory
universes v u
open category_theory
open category_theory.functor
namespace category_theory
namespace limits
variables {J : Type v} [decidable_eq J]
variables {C : Type u} [category.{v} C] [has_zero_morphisms C]
/--
A `c : bicone F` is:
* an object `c.X` and
* morphisms `π j : X ⟶ F j` and `ι j : F j ⟶ X` for each `j`,
* such that `ι j ≫ π j'` is the identity when `j = j'` and zero otherwise.
-/
@[nolint has_inhabited_instance]
structure bicone (F : J → C) :=
(X : C)
(π : Π j, X ⟶ F j)
(ι : Π j, F j ⟶ X)
(ι_π : ∀ j j', ι j ≫ π j' = if h : j = j' then eq_to_hom (congr_arg F h) else 0)
@[simp, reassoc] lemma bicone_ι_π_self {F : J → C} (B : bicone F) (j : J) :
B.ι j ≫ B.π j = 𝟙 (F j) :=
by simpa using B.ι_π j j
@[simp, reassoc] lemma bicone_ι_π_ne {F : J → C} (B : bicone F) {j j' : J} (h : j ≠ j') :
B.ι j ≫ B.π j' = 0 :=
by simpa [h] using B.ι_π j j'
variables {F : J → C}
namespace bicone
/-- Extract the cone from a bicone. -/
@[simps]
def to_cone (B : bicone F) : cone (discrete.functor F) :=
{ X := B.X,
π := { app := λ j, B.π j }, }
/-- Extract the cocone from a bicone. -/
@[simps]
def to_cocone (B : bicone F) : cocone (discrete.functor F) :=
{ X := B.X,
ι := { app := λ j, B.ι j }, }
/-- We can turn any limit cone over a discrete collection of objects into a bicone. -/
@[simps]
def of_limit_cone {f : J → C} {t : cone (discrete.functor f)} (ht : is_limit t) :
bicone f :=
{ X := t.X,
π := t.π.app,
ι := λ j, ht.lift (fan.mk _ (λ j', if h : j = j' then eq_to_hom (congr_arg f h) else 0)),
ι_π := λ j j', by simp }
lemma ι_of_is_limit {f : J → C} {t : bicone f} (ht : is_limit t.to_cone) (j : J) :
t.ι j = ht.lift (fan.mk _ (λ j', if h : j = j' then eq_to_hom (congr_arg f h) else 0)) :=
ht.hom_ext (λ j', by { rw ht.fac, simp [t.ι_π] })
/-- We can turn any colimit cocone over a discrete collection of objects into a bicone. -/
@[simps]
def of_colimit_cocone {f : J → C} {t : cocone (discrete.functor f)} (ht : is_colimit t) :
bicone f :=
{ X := t.X,
π := λ j, ht.desc (cofan.mk _ (λ j', if h : j' = j then eq_to_hom (congr_arg f h) else 0)),
ι := t.ι.app,
ι_π := λ j j', by simp }
lemma π_of_is_colimit {f : J → C} {t : bicone f} (ht : is_colimit t.to_cocone) (j : J) :
t.π j = ht.desc (cofan.mk _ (λ j', if h : j' = j then eq_to_hom (congr_arg f h) else 0)) :=
ht.hom_ext (λ j', by { rw ht.fac, simp [t.ι_π] })
/-- Structure witnessing that a bicone is both a limit cone and a colimit cocone. -/
@[nolint has_inhabited_instance]
structure is_bilimit {F : J → C} (B : bicone F) :=
(is_limit : is_limit B.to_cone)
(is_colimit : is_colimit B.to_cocone)
end bicone
/--
A bicone over `F : J → C`, which is both a limit cone and a colimit cocone.
-/
@[nolint has_inhabited_instance]
structure limit_bicone (F : J → C) :=
(bicone : bicone F)
(is_bilimit : bicone.is_bilimit)
/--
`has_biproduct F` expresses the mere existence of a bicone which is
simultaneously a limit and a colimit of the diagram `F`.
-/
class has_biproduct (F : J → C) : Prop :=
mk' :: (exists_biproduct : nonempty (limit_bicone F))
lemma has_biproduct.mk {F : J → C} (d : limit_bicone F) : has_biproduct F :=
⟨nonempty.intro d⟩
/-- Use the axiom of choice to extract explicit `biproduct_data F` from `has_biproduct F`. -/
def get_biproduct_data (F : J → C) [has_biproduct F] : limit_bicone F :=
classical.choice has_biproduct.exists_biproduct
/-- A bicone for `F` which is both a limit cone and a colimit cocone. -/
def biproduct.bicone (F : J → C) [has_biproduct F] : bicone F :=
(get_biproduct_data F).bicone
/-- `biproduct.bicone F` is a bilimit bicone. -/
def biproduct.is_bilimit (F : J → C) [has_biproduct F] : (biproduct.bicone F).is_bilimit :=
(get_biproduct_data F).is_bilimit
/-- `biproduct.bicone F` is a limit cone. -/
def biproduct.is_limit (F : J → C) [has_biproduct F] : is_limit (biproduct.bicone F).to_cone :=
(get_biproduct_data F).is_bilimit.is_limit
/-- `biproduct.bicone F` is a colimit cocone. -/
def biproduct.is_colimit (F : J → C) [has_biproduct F] :
is_colimit (biproduct.bicone F).to_cocone :=
(get_biproduct_data F).is_bilimit.is_colimit
@[priority 100]
instance has_product_of_has_biproduct [has_biproduct F] : has_limit (discrete.functor F) :=
has_limit.mk { cone := (biproduct.bicone F).to_cone,
is_limit := biproduct.is_limit F, }
@[priority 100]
instance has_coproduct_of_has_biproduct [has_biproduct F] : has_colimit (discrete.functor F) :=
has_colimit.mk { cocone := (biproduct.bicone F).to_cocone,
is_colimit := biproduct.is_colimit F, }
variables (J C)
/--
`C` has biproducts of shape `J` if we have
a limit and a colimit, with the same cone points,
of every function `F : J → C`.
-/
class has_biproducts_of_shape : Prop :=
(has_biproduct : Π F : J → C, has_biproduct F)
attribute [instance, priority 100] has_biproducts_of_shape.has_biproduct
/-- `has_finite_biproducts C` represents a choice of biproduct for every family of objects in `C`
indexed by a finite type with decidable equality. -/
class has_finite_biproducts : Prop :=
(has_biproducts_of_shape : Π (J : Type v) [decidable_eq J] [fintype J],
has_biproducts_of_shape J C)
attribute [instance, priority 100] has_finite_biproducts.has_biproducts_of_shape
@[priority 100]
instance has_finite_products_of_has_finite_biproducts [has_finite_biproducts C] :
has_finite_products C :=
{ out := λ J _ _, ⟨λ F, by exactI has_limit_of_iso discrete.nat_iso_functor.symm⟩ }
@[priority 100]
instance has_finite_coproducts_of_has_finite_biproducts [has_finite_biproducts C] :
has_finite_coproducts C :=
{ out := λ J _ _, ⟨λ F, by exactI has_colimit_of_iso discrete.nat_iso_functor⟩ }
variables {J C}
/--
The isomorphism between the specified limit and the specified colimit for
a functor with a bilimit.
-/
def biproduct_iso (F : J → C) [has_biproduct F] :
limits.pi_obj F ≅ limits.sigma_obj F :=
(is_limit.cone_point_unique_up_to_iso (limit.is_limit _) (biproduct.is_limit F)).trans $
is_colimit.cocone_point_unique_up_to_iso (biproduct.is_colimit F) (colimit.is_colimit _)
end limits
namespace limits
variables {J : Type v} [decidable_eq J]
variables {C : Type u} [category.{v} C] [has_zero_morphisms C]
/-- `biproduct f` computes the biproduct of a family of elements `f`. (It is defined as an
abbreviation for `limit (discrete.functor f)`, so for most facts about `biproduct f`, you will
just use general facts about limits and colimits.) -/
abbreviation biproduct (f : J → C) [has_biproduct f] : C :=
(biproduct.bicone f).X
notation `⨁ ` f:20 := biproduct f
/-- The projection onto a summand of a biproduct. -/
abbreviation biproduct.π (f : J → C) [has_biproduct f] (b : J) : ⨁ f ⟶ f b :=
(biproduct.bicone f).π b
@[simp]
lemma biproduct.bicone_π (f : J → C) [has_biproduct f] (b : J) :
(biproduct.bicone f).π b = biproduct.π f b := rfl
/-- The inclusion into a summand of a biproduct. -/
abbreviation biproduct.ι (f : J → C) [has_biproduct f] (b : J) : f b ⟶ ⨁ f :=
(biproduct.bicone f).ι b
@[simp]
lemma biproduct.bicone_ι (f : J → C) [has_biproduct f] (b : J) :
(biproduct.bicone f).ι b = biproduct.ι f b := rfl
@[reassoc]
lemma biproduct.ι_π (f : J → C) [has_biproduct f] (j j' : J) :
biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.π f j' = if h : j = j' then eq_to_hom (congr_arg f h) else 0 :=
(biproduct.bicone f).ι_π j j'
@[simp,reassoc]
lemma biproduct.ι_π_self (f : J → C) [has_biproduct f] (j : J) :
biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.π f j = 𝟙 _ :=
by simp [biproduct.ι_π]
@[simp,reassoc]
lemma biproduct.ι_π_ne (f : J → C) [has_biproduct f] {j j' : J} (h : j ≠ j') :
biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.π f j' = 0 :=
by simp [biproduct.ι_π, h]
/-- Given a collection of maps into the summands, we obtain a map into the biproduct. -/
abbreviation biproduct.lift
{f : J → C} [has_biproduct f] {P : C} (p : Π b, P ⟶ f b) : P ⟶ ⨁ f :=
(biproduct.is_limit f).lift (fan.mk P p)
/-- Given a collection of maps out of the summands, we obtain a map out of the biproduct. -/
abbreviation biproduct.desc
{f : J → C} [has_biproduct f] {P : C} (p : Π b, f b ⟶ P) : ⨁ f ⟶ P :=
(biproduct.is_colimit f).desc (cofan.mk P p)
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma biproduct.lift_π {f : J → C} [has_biproduct f] {P : C} (p : Π b, P ⟶ f b) (j : J) :
biproduct.lift p ≫ biproduct.π f j = p j :=
(biproduct.is_limit f).fac _ _
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma biproduct.ι_desc {f : J → C} [has_biproduct f] {P : C} (p : Π b, f b ⟶ P) (j : J) :
biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.desc p = p j :=
(biproduct.is_colimit f).fac _ _
/-- Given a collection of maps between corresponding summands of a pair of biproducts
indexed by the same type, we obtain a map between the biproducts. -/
abbreviation biproduct.map {f g : J → C} [has_biproduct f] [has_biproduct g]
(p : Π b, f b ⟶ g b) : ⨁ f ⟶ ⨁ g :=
is_limit.map (biproduct.bicone f).to_cone (biproduct.is_limit g) (discrete.nat_trans p)
/-- An alternative to `biproduct.map` constructed via colimits.
This construction only exists in order to show it is equal to `biproduct.map`. -/
abbreviation biproduct.map' {f g : J → C} [has_biproduct f] [has_biproduct g]
(p : Π b, f b ⟶ g b) : ⨁ f ⟶ ⨁ g :=
is_colimit.map (biproduct.is_colimit f) (biproduct.bicone g).to_cocone (discrete.nat_trans p)
@[ext] lemma biproduct.hom_ext {f : J → C} [has_biproduct f]
{Z : C} (g h : Z ⟶ ⨁ f)
(w : ∀ j, g ≫ biproduct.π f j = h ≫ biproduct.π f j) : g = h :=
(biproduct.is_limit f).hom_ext w
@[ext] lemma biproduct.hom_ext' {f : J → C} [has_biproduct f]
{Z : C} (g h : ⨁ f ⟶ Z)
(w : ∀ j, biproduct.ι f j ≫ g = biproduct.ι f j ≫ h) : g = h :=
(biproduct.is_colimit f).hom_ext w
lemma biproduct.map_eq_map' {f g : J → C} [has_biproduct f] [has_biproduct g]
(p : Π b, f b ⟶ g b) : biproduct.map p = biproduct.map' p :=
begin
ext j j',
simp only [discrete.nat_trans_app, limits.is_colimit.ι_map, limits.is_limit.map_π, category.assoc,
←bicone.to_cone_π_app, ←biproduct.bicone_π, ←bicone.to_cocone_ι_app, ←biproduct.bicone_ι],
simp only [biproduct.bicone_ι, biproduct.bicone_π, bicone.to_cocone_ι_app, bicone.to_cone_π_app],
rw [biproduct.ι_π_assoc, biproduct.ι_π],
split_ifs,
{ subst h, rw [eq_to_hom_refl, category.id_comp], erw category.comp_id, },
{ simp, },
end
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma biproduct.map_π {f g : J → C} [has_biproduct f] [has_biproduct g]
(p : Π j, f j ⟶ g j) (j : J) :
biproduct.map p ≫ biproduct.π g j = biproduct.π f j ≫ p j :=
limits.is_limit.map_π _ _ _ _
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma biproduct.ι_map {f g : J → C} [has_biproduct f] [has_biproduct g]
(p : Π j, f j ⟶ g j) (j : J) :
biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.map p = p j ≫ biproduct.ι g j :=
begin
rw biproduct.map_eq_map',
convert limits.is_colimit.ι_map _ _ _ _; refl
end
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma biproduct.map_desc {f g : J → C} [has_biproduct f] [has_biproduct g]
(p : Π j, f j ⟶ g j) {P : C} (k : Π j, g j ⟶ P) :
biproduct.map p ≫ biproduct.desc k = biproduct.desc (λ j, p j ≫ k j) :=
by { ext, simp, }
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma biproduct.lift_map {f g : J → C} [has_biproduct f] [has_biproduct g]
{P : C} (k : Π j, P ⟶ f j) (p : Π j, f j ⟶ g j) :
biproduct.lift k ≫ biproduct.map p = biproduct.lift (λ j, k j ≫ p j) :=
by { ext, simp, }
/-- Given a collection of isomorphisms between corresponding summands of a pair of biproducts
indexed by the same type, we obtain an isomorphism between the biproducts. -/
@[simps]
def biproduct.map_iso {f g : J → C} [has_biproduct f] [has_biproduct g]
(p : Π b, f b ≅ g b) : ⨁ f ≅ ⨁ g :=
{ hom := biproduct.map (λ b, (p b).hom),
inv := biproduct.map (λ b, (p b).inv), }
section π_kernel
section
variables (f : J → C) [has_biproduct f]
variables (p : J → Prop) [has_biproduct (subtype.restrict p f)]
/-- The canonical morphism from the biproduct over a restricted index type to the biproduct of
the full index type. -/
def biproduct.from_subtype : ⨁ subtype.restrict p f ⟶ ⨁ f :=
biproduct.desc $ λ j, biproduct.ι _ _
/-- The canonical morophism from a biproduct to the biproduct over a restriction of its index
type. -/
def biproduct.to_subtype : ⨁ f ⟶ ⨁ subtype.restrict p f :=
biproduct.lift $ λ j, biproduct.π _ _
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma biproduct.from_subtype_π (j : J) [decidable (p j)] :
biproduct.from_subtype f p ≫ biproduct.π f j =
if h : p j then biproduct.π (subtype.restrict p f) ⟨j, h⟩ else 0 :=
begin
ext i,
rw [biproduct.from_subtype, biproduct.ι_desc_assoc, biproduct.ι_π],
by_cases h : p j,
{ rw [dif_pos h, biproduct.ι_π],
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₂,
exacts [rfl, false.elim (h₂ (subtype.ext h₁)),
false.elim (h₁ (congr_arg subtype.val h₂)), rfl] },
{ rw [dif_neg h, dif_neg (show (i : J) ≠ j, from λ h₂, h (h₂ ▸ i.2)), comp_zero] }
end
lemma biproduct.from_subtype_eq_lift [decidable_pred p] : biproduct.from_subtype f p =
biproduct.lift (λ j, if h : p j then biproduct.π (subtype.restrict p f) ⟨j, h⟩ else 0) :=
biproduct.hom_ext _ _ (by simp)
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma biproduct.from_subtype_π_subtype (j : subtype p) :
biproduct.from_subtype f p ≫ biproduct.π f j = biproduct.π (subtype.restrict p f) j :=
begin
ext i,
rw [biproduct.from_subtype, biproduct.ι_desc_assoc, biproduct.ι_π, biproduct.ι_π],
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₂,
exacts [rfl, false.elim (h₂ (subtype.ext h₁)), false.elim (h₁ (congr_arg subtype.val h₂)), rfl]
end
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma biproduct.to_subtype_π (j : subtype p) :
biproduct.to_subtype f p ≫ biproduct.π (subtype.restrict p f) j = biproduct.π f j :=
biproduct.lift_π _ _
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma biproduct.ι_to_subtype (j : J) [decidable (p j)] :
biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.to_subtype f p =
if h : p j then biproduct.ι (subtype.restrict p f) ⟨j, h⟩ else 0 :=
begin
ext i,
rw [biproduct.to_subtype, category.assoc, biproduct.lift_π, biproduct.ι_π],
by_cases h : p j,
{ rw [dif_pos h, biproduct.ι_π],
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₂,
exacts [rfl, false.elim (h₂ (subtype.ext h₁)),
false.elim (h₁ (congr_arg subtype.val h₂)), rfl] },
{ rw [dif_neg h, dif_neg (show j ≠ i, from λ h₂, h (h₂.symm ▸ i.2)), zero_comp] }
end
lemma biproduct.to_subtype_eq_desc [decidable_pred p] : biproduct.to_subtype f p =
biproduct.desc (λ j, if h : p j then biproduct.ι (subtype.restrict p f) ⟨j, h⟩ else 0) :=
biproduct.hom_ext' _ _ (by simp)
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma biproduct.ι_to_subtype_subtype (j : subtype p) :
biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.to_subtype f p = biproduct.ι (subtype.restrict p f) j :=
begin
ext i,
rw [biproduct.to_subtype, category.assoc, biproduct.lift_π, biproduct.ι_π, biproduct.ι_π],
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₂,
exacts [rfl, false.elim (h₂ (subtype.ext h₁)), false.elim (h₁ (congr_arg subtype.val h₂)), rfl]
end
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma biproduct.ι_from_subtype (j : subtype p) :
biproduct.ι (subtype.restrict p f) j ≫ biproduct.from_subtype f p = biproduct.ι f j :=
biproduct.ι_desc _ _
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma biproduct.from_subtype_to_subtype :
biproduct.from_subtype f p ≫ biproduct.to_subtype f p = 𝟙 (⨁ subtype.restrict p f) :=
begin
refine biproduct.hom_ext _ _ (λ j, _),
rw [category.assoc, biproduct.to_subtype_π, biproduct.from_subtype_π_subtype, category.id_comp]
end
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma biproduct.to_subtype_from_subtype [decidable_pred p] :
biproduct.to_subtype f p ≫ biproduct.from_subtype f p =
biproduct.map (λ j, if p j then 𝟙 (f j) else 0) :=
begin
ext1 i,
by_cases h : p i,
{ simp [h], congr },
{ simp [h] }
end
end
variables (f : J → C) (i : J) [has_biproduct f] [has_biproduct (subtype.restrict (λ j, i ≠ j) f)]
/-- The kernel of `biproduct.π f i` is the inclusion from the biproduct which omits `i`
from the index set `J` into the biproduct over `J`. -/
def biproduct.is_limit_from_subtype : is_limit
(kernel_fork.of_ι (biproduct.from_subtype f (λ j, i ≠ j))
(by simp) : kernel_fork (biproduct.π f i)) :=
fork.is_limit.mk' _ $ λ s,
⟨s.ι ≫ biproduct.to_subtype _ _,
begin
ext j,
rw [kernel_fork.ι_of_ι, category.assoc, category.assoc,
biproduct.to_subtype_from_subtype_assoc, biproduct.map_π],
rcases em (i = j) with (rfl|h),
{ rw [if_neg (not_not.2 rfl), comp_zero, comp_zero, kernel_fork.condition] },
{ rw [if_pos h, category.comp_id] }
end,
begin
intros m hm,
rw [← hm, kernel_fork.ι_of_ι, category.assoc, biproduct.from_subtype_to_subtype],
exact (category.comp_id _).symm
end⟩
/-- The cokernel of `biproduct.ι f i` is the projection from the biproduct over the index set `J`
onto the biproduct omitting `i`. -/
def biproduct.is_colimit_to_subtype : is_colimit
(cokernel_cofork.of_π (biproduct.to_subtype f (λ j, i ≠ j))
(by simp) : cokernel_cofork (biproduct.ι f i)) :=
cofork.is_colimit.mk' _ $ λ s,
⟨biproduct.from_subtype _ _ ≫ s.π,
begin
ext j,
rw [cokernel_cofork.π_of_π, biproduct.to_subtype_from_subtype_assoc,
biproduct.ι_map_assoc],
rcases em (i = j) with (rfl|h),
{ rw [if_neg (not_not.2 rfl), zero_comp, cokernel_cofork.condition] },
{ rw [if_pos h, category.id_comp] }
end,
begin
intros m hm,
rw [← hm, cokernel_cofork.π_of_π, ← category.assoc, biproduct.from_subtype_to_subtype],
exact (category.id_comp _).symm
end⟩
end π_kernel
section
variables [fintype J] {K : Type v} [fintype K] [decidable_eq K] {f : J → C} {g : K → C}
[has_finite_biproducts C]
/--
Convert a (dependently typed) matrix to a morphism of biproducts.
-/
def biproduct.matrix (m : Π j k, f j ⟶ g k) : ⨁ f ⟶ ⨁ g :=
biproduct.desc (λ j, biproduct.lift (λ k, m j k))
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma biproduct.matrix_π (m : Π j k, f j ⟶ g k) (k : K) :
biproduct.matrix m ≫ biproduct.π g k = biproduct.desc (λ j, m j k) :=
by { ext, simp [biproduct.matrix], }
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma biproduct.ι_matrix (m : Π j k, f j ⟶ g k) (j : J) :
biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.matrix m = biproduct.lift (λ k, m j k) :=
by { ext, simp [biproduct.matrix], }
/--
Extract the matrix components from a morphism of biproducts.
-/
def biproduct.components (m : ⨁ f ⟶ ⨁ g) (j : J) (k : K) : f j ⟶ g k :=
biproduct.ι f j ≫ m ≫ biproduct.π g k
@[simp] lemma biproduct.matrix_components (m : Π j k, f j ⟶ g k) (j : J) (k : K) :
biproduct.components (biproduct.matrix m) j k = m j k :=
by simp [biproduct.components]
@[simp] lemma biproduct.components_matrix (m : ⨁ f ⟶ ⨁ g) :
biproduct.matrix (λ j k, biproduct.components m j k) = m :=
by { ext, simp [biproduct.components], }
/-- Morphisms between direct sums are matrices. -/
@[simps]
def biproduct.matrix_equiv : (⨁ f ⟶ ⨁ g) ≃ (Π j k, f j ⟶ g k) :=
{ to_fun := biproduct.components,
inv_fun := biproduct.matrix,
left_inv := biproduct.components_matrix,
right_inv := λ m, by { ext, apply biproduct.matrix_components } }
end
instance biproduct.ι_mono (f : J → C) [has_biproduct f]
(b : J) : split_mono (biproduct.ι f b) :=
{ retraction := biproduct.desc $
λ b', if h : b' = b then eq_to_hom (congr_arg f h) else biproduct.ι f b' ≫ biproduct.π f b }
instance biproduct.π_epi (f : J → C) [has_biproduct f]
(b : J) : split_epi (biproduct.π f b) :=
{ section_ := biproduct.lift $
λ b', if h : b = b' then eq_to_hom (congr_arg f h) else biproduct.ι f b ≫ biproduct.π f b' }
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `biproduct.unique_up_to_iso`. -/
lemma biproduct.cone_point_unique_up_to_iso_hom (f : J → C) [has_biproduct f] {b : bicone f}
(hb : b.is_bilimit) :
(hb.is_limit.cone_point_unique_up_to_iso (biproduct.is_limit _)).hom = biproduct.lift b.π :=
rfl
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `biproduct.unique_up_to_iso`. -/
lemma biproduct.cone_point_unique_up_to_iso_inv (f : J → C) [has_biproduct f] {b : bicone f}
(hb : b.is_bilimit) :
(hb.is_limit.cone_point_unique_up_to_iso (biproduct.is_limit _)).inv = biproduct.desc b.ι :=
begin
refine biproduct.hom_ext' _ _ (λ j, hb.is_limit.hom_ext (λ j', _)),
rw [category.assoc, is_limit.cone_point_unique_up_to_iso_inv_comp, bicone.to_cone_π_app,
biproduct.bicone_π, biproduct.ι_desc, biproduct.ι_π, b.to_cone_π_app, b.ι_π]
end
/-- Biproducts are unique up to isomorphism. This already follows because bilimits are limits,
but in the case of biproducts we can give an isomorphism with particularly nice definitional
properties, namely that `biproduct.lift b.π` and `biproduct.desc b.ι` are inverses of each
other. -/
@[simps]
def biproduct.unique_up_to_iso (f : J → C) [has_biproduct f] {b : bicone f} (hb : b.is_bilimit) :
b.X ≅ ⨁ f :=
{ hom := biproduct.lift b.π,
inv := biproduct.desc b.ι,
hom_inv_id' := by rw [← biproduct.cone_point_unique_up_to_iso_hom f hb,
← biproduct.cone_point_unique_up_to_iso_inv f hb, iso.hom_inv_id],
inv_hom_id' := by rw [← biproduct.cone_point_unique_up_to_iso_hom f hb,
← biproduct.cone_point_unique_up_to_iso_inv f hb, iso.inv_hom_id] }
section
variables (C)
/-- A category with finite biproducts has a zero object. -/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance has_zero_object_of_has_finite_biproducts [has_finite_biproducts C] : has_zero_object C :=
by { refine ⟨⟨biproduct pempty.elim, λ X, ⟨⟨⟨0⟩, _⟩⟩, λ X, ⟨⟨⟨0⟩, _⟩⟩⟩⟩, tidy, }
end
/--
A binary bicone for a pair of objects `P Q : C` consists of the cone point `X`,
maps from `X` to both `P` and `Q`, and maps from both `P` and `Q` to `X`,
so that `inl ≫ fst = 𝟙 P`, `inl ≫ snd = 0`, `inr ≫ fst = 0`, and `inr ≫ snd = 𝟙 Q`
-/
@[nolint has_inhabited_instance]
structure binary_bicone (P Q : C) :=
(X : C)
(fst : X ⟶ P)
(snd : X ⟶ Q)
(inl : P ⟶ X)
(inr : Q ⟶ X)
(inl_fst' : inl ≫ fst = 𝟙 P . obviously)
(inl_snd' : inl ≫ snd = 0 . obviously)
(inr_fst' : inr ≫ fst = 0 . obviously)
(inr_snd' : inr ≫ snd = 𝟙 Q . obviously)
restate_axiom binary_bicone.inl_fst'
restate_axiom binary_bicone.inl_snd'
restate_axiom binary_bicone.inr_fst'
restate_axiom binary_bicone.inr_snd'
attribute [simp, reassoc] binary_bicone.inl_fst binary_bicone.inl_snd
binary_bicone.inr_fst binary_bicone.inr_snd
namespace binary_bicone
variables {P Q : C}
/-- Extract the cone from a binary bicone. -/
def to_cone (c : binary_bicone P Q) : cone (pair P Q) :=
binary_fan.mk c.fst c.snd
@[simp]
lemma to_cone_X (c : binary_bicone P Q) :
c.to_cone.X = c.X := rfl
@[simp]
lemma to_cone_π_app_left (c : binary_bicone P Q) :
c.to_cone.π.app (walking_pair.left) = c.fst := rfl
@[simp]
lemma to_cone_π_app_right (c : binary_bicone P Q) :
c.to_cone.π.app (walking_pair.right) = c.snd := rfl
@[simp]
lemma binary_fan_fst_to_cone (c : binary_bicone P Q) : binary_fan.fst c.to_cone = c.fst := rfl
@[simp]
lemma binary_fan_snd_to_cone (c : binary_bicone P Q) : binary_fan.snd c.to_cone = c.snd := rfl
/-- Extract the cocone from a binary bicone. -/
def to_cocone (c : binary_bicone P Q) : cocone (pair P Q) :=
binary_cofan.mk c.inl c.inr
@[simp]
lemma to_cocone_X (c : binary_bicone P Q) :
c.to_cocone.X = c.X := rfl
@[simp]
lemma to_cocone_ι_app_left (c : binary_bicone P Q) :
c.to_cocone.ι.app (walking_pair.left) = c.inl := rfl
@[simp]
lemma to_cocone_ι_app_right (c : binary_bicone P Q) :
c.to_cocone.ι.app (walking_pair.right) = c.inr := rfl
@[simp]
lemma binary_cofan_inl_to_cocone (c : binary_bicone P Q) : binary_cofan.inl c.to_cocone = c.inl :=
rfl
@[simp]
lemma binary_cofan_inr_to_cocone (c : binary_bicone P Q) : binary_cofan.inr c.to_cocone = c.inr :=
rfl
/-- Convert a `binary_bicone` into a `bicone` over a pair. -/
@[simps]
def to_bicone {X Y : C} (b : binary_bicone X Y) : bicone (pair X Y).obj :=
{ X := b.X,
π := λ j, walking_pair.cases_on j b.fst b.snd,
ι := λ j, walking_pair.cases_on j b.inl b.inr,
ι_π := λ j j', by { cases j; cases j', tidy } }
/-- A binary bicone is a limit cone if and only if the corresponding bicone is a limit cone. -/
def to_bicone_is_limit {X Y : C} (b : binary_bicone X Y) :
is_limit (b.to_bicone.to_cone) ≃ is_limit (b.to_cone) :=
is_limit.equiv_iso_limit $ cones.ext (iso.refl _) (λ j, by { cases j, tidy })
/-- A binary bicone is a colimit cocone if and only if the corresponding bicone is a colimit
cocone. -/
def to_bicone_is_colimit {X Y : C} (b : binary_bicone X Y) :
is_colimit (b.to_bicone.to_cocone) ≃ is_colimit (b.to_cocone) :=
is_colimit.equiv_iso_colimit $ cocones.ext (iso.refl _) (λ j, by { cases j, tidy })
end binary_bicone
namespace bicone
/-- Convert a `bicone` over a function on `walking_pair` to a binary_bicone. -/
@[simps]
def to_binary_bicone {X Y : C} (b : bicone (pair X Y).obj) : binary_bicone X Y :=
{ X := b.X,
fst := b.π walking_pair.left,
snd := b.π walking_pair.right,
inl := b.ι walking_pair.left,
inr := b.ι walking_pair.right,
inl_fst' := by { simp [bicone.ι_π], refl, },
inr_fst' := by simp [bicone.ι_π],
inl_snd' := by simp [bicone.ι_π],
inr_snd' := by { simp [bicone.ι_π], refl, }, }
/-- A bicone over a pair is a limit cone if and only if the corresponding binary bicone is a limit
cone. -/
def to_binary_bicone_is_limit {X Y : C} (b : bicone (pair X Y).obj) :
is_limit (b.to_binary_bicone.to_cone) ≃ is_limit (b.to_cone) :=
is_limit.equiv_iso_limit $ cones.ext (iso.refl _) (λ j, by { cases j, tidy })
/-- A bicone over a pair is a colimit cocone if and only if the corresponding binary bicone is a
colimit cocone. -/
def to_binary_bicone_is_colimit {X Y : C} (b : bicone (pair X Y).obj) :
is_colimit (b.to_binary_bicone.to_cocone) ≃ is_colimit (b.to_cocone) :=
is_colimit.equiv_iso_colimit $ cocones.ext (iso.refl _) (λ j, by { cases j, tidy })
end bicone
/-- Structure witnessing that a binary bicone is a limit cone and a limit cocone. -/
@[nolint has_inhabited_instance]
structure binary_bicone.is_bilimit {P Q : C} (b : binary_bicone P Q) :=
(is_limit : is_limit b.to_cone)
(is_colimit : is_colimit b.to_cocone)
/-- A binary bicone is a bilimit bicone if and only if the corresponding bicone is a bilimit. -/
def binary_bicone.to_bicone_is_bilimit {X Y : C} (b : binary_bicone X Y) :
b.to_bicone.is_bilimit ≃ b.is_bilimit :=
{ to_fun := λ h, ⟨b.to_bicone_is_limit h.is_limit, b.to_bicone_is_colimit h.is_colimit⟩,
inv_fun := λ h, ⟨b.to_bicone_is_limit.symm h.is_limit, b.to_bicone_is_colimit.symm h.is_colimit⟩,
left_inv := λ ⟨h, h'⟩, by { dsimp only, simp },
right_inv := λ ⟨h, h'⟩, by { dsimp only, simp } }
/-- A bicone over a pair is a bilimit bicone if and only if the corresponding binary bicone is a
bilimit. -/
def bicone.to_binary_bicone_is_bilimit {X Y : C} (b : bicone (pair X Y).obj) :
b.to_binary_bicone.is_bilimit ≃ b.is_bilimit :=
{ to_fun := λ h, ⟨b.to_binary_bicone_is_limit h.is_limit,
b.to_binary_bicone_is_colimit h.is_colimit⟩,
inv_fun := λ h, ⟨b.to_binary_bicone_is_limit.symm h.is_limit,
b.to_binary_bicone_is_colimit.symm h.is_colimit⟩,
left_inv := λ ⟨h, h'⟩, by { dsimp only, simp },
right_inv := λ ⟨h, h'⟩, by { dsimp only, simp } }
/--
A bicone over `P Q : C`, which is both a limit cone and a colimit cocone.
-/
@[nolint has_inhabited_instance]
structure binary_biproduct_data (P Q : C) :=
(bicone : binary_bicone P Q)
(is_bilimit : bicone.is_bilimit)
/--
`has_binary_biproduct P Q` expresses the mere existence of a bicone which is
simultaneously a limit and a colimit of the diagram `pair P Q`.
-/
class has_binary_biproduct (P Q : C) : Prop :=
mk' :: (exists_binary_biproduct : nonempty (binary_biproduct_data P Q))
lemma has_binary_biproduct.mk {P Q : C} (d : binary_biproduct_data P Q) :
has_binary_biproduct P Q :=
⟨nonempty.intro d⟩
/--
Use the axiom of choice to extract explicit `binary_biproduct_data F` from `has_binary_biproduct F`.
-/
def get_binary_biproduct_data (P Q : C) [has_binary_biproduct P Q] : binary_biproduct_data P Q :=
classical.choice has_binary_biproduct.exists_binary_biproduct
/-- A bicone for `P Q ` which is both a limit cone and a colimit cocone. -/
def binary_biproduct.bicone (P Q : C) [has_binary_biproduct P Q] : binary_bicone P Q :=
(get_binary_biproduct_data P Q).bicone
/-- `binary_biproduct.bicone P Q` is a limit bicone. -/
def binary_biproduct.is_bilimit (P Q : C) [has_binary_biproduct P Q] :
(binary_biproduct.bicone P Q).is_bilimit :=
(get_binary_biproduct_data P Q).is_bilimit
/-- `binary_biproduct.bicone P Q` is a limit cone. -/
def binary_biproduct.is_limit (P Q : C) [has_binary_biproduct P Q] :
is_limit (binary_biproduct.bicone P Q).to_cone :=
(get_binary_biproduct_data P Q).is_bilimit.is_limit
/-- `binary_biproduct.bicone P Q` is a colimit cocone. -/
def binary_biproduct.is_colimit (P Q : C) [has_binary_biproduct P Q] :
is_colimit (binary_biproduct.bicone P Q).to_cocone :=
(get_binary_biproduct_data P Q).is_bilimit.is_colimit
section
variable (C)
/--
`has_binary_biproducts C` represents the existence of a bicone which is
simultaneously a limit and a colimit of the diagram `pair P Q`, for every `P Q : C`.
-/
class has_binary_biproducts : Prop :=
(has_binary_biproduct : Π (P Q : C), has_binary_biproduct P Q)
attribute [instance, priority 100] has_binary_biproducts.has_binary_biproduct
/--
A category with finite biproducts has binary biproducts.
This is not an instance as typically in concrete categories there will be
an alternative construction with nicer definitional properties.
-/
lemma has_binary_biproducts_of_finite_biproducts [has_finite_biproducts C] :
has_binary_biproducts C :=
{ has_binary_biproduct := λ P Q, has_binary_biproduct.mk
{ bicone := (biproduct.bicone (pair P Q).obj).to_binary_bicone,
is_bilimit := (bicone.to_binary_bicone_is_bilimit _).symm (biproduct.is_bilimit _) } }
end
variables {P Q : C}
instance has_binary_biproduct.has_limit_pair [has_binary_biproduct P Q] :
has_limit (pair P Q) :=
has_limit.mk ⟨_, binary_biproduct.is_limit P Q⟩
instance has_binary_biproduct.has_colimit_pair [has_binary_biproduct P Q] :
has_colimit (pair P Q) :=
has_colimit.mk ⟨_, binary_biproduct.is_colimit P Q⟩
@[priority 100]
instance has_binary_products_of_has_binary_biproducts [has_binary_biproducts C] :
has_binary_products C :=
{ has_limit := λ F, has_limit_of_iso (diagram_iso_pair F).symm }
@[priority 100]
instance has_binary_coproducts_of_has_binary_biproducts [has_binary_biproducts C] :
has_binary_coproducts C :=
{ has_colimit := λ F, has_colimit_of_iso (diagram_iso_pair F) }
/--
The isomorphism between the specified binary product and the specified binary coproduct for
a pair for a binary biproduct.
-/
def biprod_iso (X Y : C) [has_binary_biproduct X Y] :
limits.prod X Y ≅ limits.coprod X Y :=
(is_limit.cone_point_unique_up_to_iso (limit.is_limit _) (binary_biproduct.is_limit X Y)).trans $
is_colimit.cocone_point_unique_up_to_iso (binary_biproduct.is_colimit X Y) (colimit.is_colimit _)
/-- An arbitrary choice of biproduct of a pair of objects. -/
abbreviation biprod (X Y : C) [has_binary_biproduct X Y] := (binary_biproduct.bicone X Y).X
notation X ` ⊞ `:20 Y:20 := biprod X Y
/-- The projection onto the first summand of a binary biproduct. -/
abbreviation biprod.fst {X Y : C} [has_binary_biproduct X Y] : X ⊞ Y ⟶ X :=
(binary_biproduct.bicone X Y).fst
/-- The projection onto the second summand of a binary biproduct. -/
abbreviation biprod.snd {X Y : C} [has_binary_biproduct X Y] : X ⊞ Y ⟶ Y :=
(binary_biproduct.bicone X Y).snd
/-- The inclusion into the first summand of a binary biproduct. -/
abbreviation biprod.inl {X Y : C} [has_binary_biproduct X Y] : X ⟶ X ⊞ Y :=
(binary_biproduct.bicone X Y).inl
/-- The inclusion into the second summand of a binary biproduct. -/
abbreviation biprod.inr {X Y : C} [has_binary_biproduct X Y] : Y ⟶ X ⊞ Y :=
(binary_biproduct.bicone X Y).inr
section
variables {X Y : C} [has_binary_biproduct X Y]
@[simp] lemma binary_biproduct.bicone_fst : (binary_biproduct.bicone X Y).fst = biprod.fst := rfl
@[simp] lemma binary_biproduct.bicone_snd : (binary_biproduct.bicone X Y).snd = biprod.snd := rfl
@[simp] lemma binary_biproduct.bicone_inl : (binary_biproduct.bicone X Y).inl = biprod.inl := rfl
@[simp] lemma binary_biproduct.bicone_inr : (binary_biproduct.bicone X Y).inr = biprod.inr := rfl
end
@[simp,reassoc]
lemma biprod.inl_fst {X Y : C} [has_binary_biproduct X Y] :
(biprod.inl : X ⟶ X ⊞ Y) ≫ (biprod.fst : X ⊞ Y ⟶ X) = 𝟙 X :=
(binary_biproduct.bicone X Y).inl_fst
@[simp,reassoc]
lemma biprod.inl_snd {X Y : C} [has_binary_biproduct X Y] :
(biprod.inl : X ⟶ X ⊞ Y) ≫ (biprod.snd : X ⊞ Y ⟶ Y) = 0 :=
(binary_biproduct.bicone X Y).inl_snd
@[simp,reassoc]
lemma biprod.inr_fst {X Y : C} [has_binary_biproduct X Y] :
(biprod.inr : Y ⟶ X ⊞ Y) ≫ (biprod.fst : X ⊞ Y ⟶ X) = 0 :=
(binary_biproduct.bicone X Y).inr_fst
@[simp,reassoc]
lemma biprod.inr_snd {X Y : C} [has_binary_biproduct X Y] :
(biprod.inr : Y ⟶ X ⊞ Y) ≫ (biprod.snd : X ⊞ Y ⟶ Y) = 𝟙 Y :=
(binary_biproduct.bicone X Y).inr_snd
/-- Given a pair of maps into the summands of a binary biproduct,
we obtain a map into the binary biproduct. -/
abbreviation biprod.lift {W X Y : C} [has_binary_biproduct X Y] (f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y) :
W ⟶ X ⊞ Y :=
(binary_biproduct.is_limit X Y).lift (binary_fan.mk f g)
/-- Given a pair of maps out of the summands of a binary biproduct,
we obtain a map out of the binary biproduct. -/
abbreviation biprod.desc {W X Y : C} [has_binary_biproduct X Y] (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W) :
X ⊞ Y ⟶ W :=
(binary_biproduct.is_colimit X Y).desc (binary_cofan.mk f g)
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma biprod.lift_fst {W X Y : C} [has_binary_biproduct X Y] (f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y) :
biprod.lift f g ≫ biprod.fst = f :=
(binary_biproduct.is_limit X Y).fac _ walking_pair.left
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma biprod.lift_snd {W X Y : C} [has_binary_biproduct X Y] (f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y) :
biprod.lift f g ≫ biprod.snd = g :=
(binary_biproduct.is_limit X Y).fac _ walking_pair.right
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma biprod.inl_desc {W X Y : C} [has_binary_biproduct X Y] (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W) :
biprod.inl ≫ biprod.desc f g = f :=
(binary_biproduct.is_colimit X Y).fac _ walking_pair.left
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma biprod.inr_desc {W X Y : C} [has_binary_biproduct X Y] (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W) :
biprod.inr ≫ biprod.desc f g = g :=
(binary_biproduct.is_colimit X Y).fac _ walking_pair.right
instance biprod.mono_lift_of_mono_left {W X Y : C} [has_binary_biproduct X Y] (f : W ⟶ X)
(g : W ⟶ Y) [mono f] : mono (biprod.lift f g) :=
mono_of_mono_fac $ biprod.lift_fst _ _
instance biprod.mono_lift_of_mono_right {W X Y : C} [has_binary_biproduct X Y] (f : W ⟶ X)
(g : W ⟶ Y) [mono g] : mono (biprod.lift f g) :=
mono_of_mono_fac $ biprod.lift_snd _ _
instance biprod.epi_desc_of_epi_left {W X Y : C} [has_binary_biproduct X Y] (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W)
[epi f] : epi (biprod.desc f g) :=
epi_of_epi_fac $ biprod.inl_desc _ _
instance biprod.epi_desc_of_epi_right {W X Y : C} [has_binary_biproduct X Y] (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W)
[epi g] : epi (biprod.desc f g) :=
epi_of_epi_fac $ biprod.inr_desc _ _
/-- Given a pair of maps between the summands of a pair of binary biproducts,
we obtain a map between the binary biproducts. -/
abbreviation biprod.map {W X Y Z : C} [has_binary_biproduct W X] [has_binary_biproduct Y Z]
(f : W ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) : W ⊞ X ⟶ Y ⊞ Z :=
is_limit.map (binary_biproduct.bicone W X).to_cone (binary_biproduct.is_limit Y Z)
(@map_pair _ _ (pair W X) (pair Y Z) f g)
/-- An alternative to `biprod.map` constructed via colimits.
This construction only exists in order to show it is equal to `biprod.map`. -/
abbreviation biprod.map' {W X Y Z : C} [has_binary_biproduct W X] [has_binary_biproduct Y Z]
(f : W ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) : W ⊞ X ⟶ Y ⊞ Z :=
is_colimit.map (binary_biproduct.is_colimit W X) (binary_biproduct.bicone Y Z).to_cocone
(@map_pair _ _ (pair W X) (pair Y Z) f g)
@[ext] lemma biprod.hom_ext {X Y Z : C} [has_binary_biproduct X Y] (f g : Z ⟶ X ⊞ Y)
(h₀ : f ≫ biprod.fst = g ≫ biprod.fst) (h₁ : f ≫ biprod.snd = g ≫ biprod.snd) : f = g :=
binary_fan.is_limit.hom_ext (binary_biproduct.is_limit X Y) h₀ h₁
@[ext] lemma biprod.hom_ext' {X Y Z : C} [has_binary_biproduct X Y] (f g : X ⊞ Y ⟶ Z)
(h₀ : biprod.inl ≫ f = biprod.inl ≫ g) (h₁ : biprod.inr ≫ f = biprod.inr ≫ g) : f = g :=
binary_cofan.is_colimit.hom_ext (binary_biproduct.is_colimit X Y) h₀ h₁
lemma biprod.map_eq_map' {W X Y Z : C} [has_binary_biproduct W X] [has_binary_biproduct Y Z]
(f : W ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) : biprod.map f g = biprod.map' f g :=
begin
ext,
{ simp only [map_pair_left, is_colimit.ι_map, is_limit.map_π, biprod.inl_fst_assoc,
category.assoc, ←binary_bicone.to_cone_π_app_left, ←binary_biproduct.bicone_fst,
←binary_bicone.to_cocone_ι_app_left, ←binary_biproduct.bicone_inl],
simp },
{ simp only [map_pair_left, is_colimit.ι_map, is_limit.map_π, zero_comp,
biprod.inl_snd_assoc, category.assoc,
←binary_bicone.to_cone_π_app_right, ←binary_biproduct.bicone_snd,
←binary_bicone.to_cocone_ι_app_left, ←binary_biproduct.bicone_inl],
simp },
{ simp only [map_pair_right, biprod.inr_fst_assoc, is_colimit.ι_map, is_limit.map_π,
zero_comp, category.assoc,
←binary_bicone.to_cone_π_app_left, ←binary_biproduct.bicone_fst,
←binary_bicone.to_cocone_ι_app_right, ←binary_biproduct.bicone_inr],
simp },
{ simp only [map_pair_right, is_colimit.ι_map, is_limit.map_π, biprod.inr_snd_assoc,
category.assoc, ←binary_bicone.to_cone_π_app_right, ←binary_biproduct.bicone_snd,
←binary_bicone.to_cocone_ι_app_right, ←binary_biproduct.bicone_inr],
simp }
end
instance biprod.inl_mono {X Y : C} [has_binary_biproduct X Y] :
split_mono (biprod.inl : X ⟶ X ⊞ Y) :=
{ retraction := biprod.desc (𝟙 X) (biprod.inr ≫ biprod.fst) }
instance biprod.inr_mono {X Y : C} [has_binary_biproduct X Y] :
split_mono (biprod.inr : Y ⟶ X ⊞ Y) :=
{ retraction := biprod.desc (biprod.inl ≫ biprod.snd) (𝟙 Y)}
instance biprod.fst_epi {X Y : C} [has_binary_biproduct X Y] :
split_epi (biprod.fst : X ⊞ Y ⟶ X) :=
{ section_ := biprod.lift (𝟙 X) (biprod.inl ≫ biprod.snd) }
instance biprod.snd_epi {X Y : C} [has_binary_biproduct X Y] :
split_epi (biprod.snd : X ⊞ Y ⟶ Y) :=
{ section_ := biprod.lift (biprod.inr ≫ biprod.fst) (𝟙 Y) }
@[simp,reassoc]
lemma biprod.map_fst {W X Y Z : C} [has_binary_biproduct W X] [has_binary_biproduct Y Z]
(f : W ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) :
biprod.map f g ≫ biprod.fst = biprod.fst ≫ f :=
is_limit.map_π _ _ _ walking_pair.left
@[simp,reassoc]
lemma biprod.map_snd {W X Y Z : C} [has_binary_biproduct W X] [has_binary_biproduct Y Z]
(f : W ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) :
biprod.map f g ≫ biprod.snd = biprod.snd ≫ g :=
is_limit.map_π _ _ _ walking_pair.right
-- Because `biprod.map` is defined in terms of `lim` rather than `colim`,
-- we need to provide additional `simp` lemmas.
@[simp,reassoc]
lemma biprod.inl_map {W X Y Z : C} [has_binary_biproduct W X] [has_binary_biproduct Y Z]
(f : W ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) :
biprod.inl ≫ biprod.map f g = f ≫ biprod.inl :=
begin
rw biprod.map_eq_map',
exact is_colimit.ι_map (binary_biproduct.is_colimit W X) _ _ walking_pair.left
end
@[simp,reassoc]
lemma biprod.inr_map {W X Y Z : C} [has_binary_biproduct W X] [has_binary_biproduct Y Z]
(f : W ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) :
biprod.inr ≫ biprod.map f g = g ≫ biprod.inr :=
begin
rw biprod.map_eq_map',
exact is_colimit.ι_map (binary_biproduct.is_colimit W X) _ _ walking_pair.right
end
/-- Given a pair of isomorphisms between the summands of a pair of binary biproducts,
we obtain an isomorphism between the binary biproducts. -/
@[simps]
def biprod.map_iso {W X Y Z : C} [has_binary_biproduct W X] [has_binary_biproduct Y Z]
(f : W ≅ Y) (g : X ≅ Z) : W ⊞ X ≅ Y ⊞ Z :=
{ hom := biprod.map f.hom g.hom,
inv := biprod.map f.inv g.inv }
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `biprod.unique_up_to_iso`. -/
lemma biprod.cone_point_unique_up_to_iso_hom (X Y : C) [has_binary_biproduct X Y]
{b : binary_bicone X Y} (hb : b.is_bilimit) :
(hb.is_limit.cone_point_unique_up_to_iso (binary_biproduct.is_limit _ _)).hom
= biprod.lift b.fst b.snd :=
rfl
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `biprod.unique_up_to_iso`. -/
lemma biprod.cone_point_unique_up_to_iso_inv (X Y : C) [has_binary_biproduct X Y]
{b : binary_bicone X Y} (hb : b.is_bilimit) :
(hb.is_limit.cone_point_unique_up_to_iso (binary_biproduct.is_limit _ _)).inv
= biprod.desc b.inl b.inr :=
begin
refine biprod.hom_ext' _ _ (hb.is_limit.hom_ext (λ j, _)) (hb.is_limit.hom_ext (λ j, _)),
all_goals { simp only [category.assoc, is_limit.cone_point_unique_up_to_iso_inv_comp],
cases j },
all_goals { simp }
end
/-- Binary biproducts are unique up to isomorphism. This already follows because bilimits are
limits, but in the case of biproducts we can give an isomorphism with particularly nice
definitional properties, namely that `biprod.lift b.fst b.snd` and `biprod.desc b.inl b.inr`
are inverses of each other. -/
@[simps]
def biprod.unique_up_to_iso (X Y : C) [has_binary_biproduct X Y] {b : binary_bicone X Y}
(hb : b.is_bilimit) : b.X ≅ X ⊞ Y :=
{ hom := biprod.lift b.fst b.snd,
inv := biprod.desc b.inl b.inr,
hom_inv_id' := by rw [← biprod.cone_point_unique_up_to_iso_hom X Y hb,
← biprod.cone_point_unique_up_to_iso_inv X Y hb, iso.hom_inv_id],
inv_hom_id' := by rw [← biprod.cone_point_unique_up_to_iso_hom X Y hb,
← biprod.cone_point_unique_up_to_iso_inv X Y hb, iso.inv_hom_id] }
section
variables (X Y : C) [has_binary_biproduct X Y]
-- There are three further variations,
-- about `is_iso biprod.inr`, `is_iso biprod.fst` and `is_iso biprod.snd`,
-- but any one suffices to prove `indecomposable_of_simple`
-- and they are likely not separately useful.
lemma biprod.is_iso_inl_iff_id_eq_fst_comp_inl :
is_iso (biprod.inl : X ⟶ X ⊞ Y) ↔ 𝟙 (X ⊞ Y) = biprod.fst ≫ biprod.inl :=
begin
split,
{ introI h,
have := (cancel_epi (inv biprod.inl : X ⊞ Y ⟶ X)).2 biprod.inl_fst,
rw [is_iso.inv_hom_id_assoc, category.comp_id] at this,
rw [this, is_iso.inv_hom_id], },
{ intro h, exact ⟨⟨biprod.fst, biprod.inl_fst, h.symm⟩⟩, },
end
end
section biprod_kernel
variables (X Y : C) [has_binary_biproduct X Y]
/-- A kernel fork for the kernel of `biprod.fst`. It consists of the
morphism `biprod.inr`. -/
def biprod.fst_kernel_fork : kernel_fork (biprod.fst : X ⊞ Y ⟶ X) :=
kernel_fork.of_ι biprod.inr biprod.inr_fst
@[simp]
lemma biprod.fst_kernel_fork_ι : fork.ι (biprod.fst_kernel_fork X Y) = biprod.inr :=
rfl
/-- The fork `biprod.fst_kernel_fork` is indeed a limit. -/
def biprod.is_kernel_fst_kernel_fork : is_limit (biprod.fst_kernel_fork X Y) :=
fork.is_limit.mk' _ $ λ s, ⟨s.ι ≫ biprod.snd, by ext; simp, λ m hm, by simp [← hm]⟩
/-- A kernel fork for the kernel of `biprod.snd`. It consists of the
morphism `biprod.inl`. -/
def biprod.snd_kernel_fork : kernel_fork (biprod.snd : X ⊞ Y ⟶ Y) :=
kernel_fork.of_ι biprod.inl biprod.inl_snd
@[simp]
lemma biprod.snd_kernel_fork_ι : fork.ι (biprod.snd_kernel_fork X Y) = biprod.inl :=
rfl
/-- The fork `biprod.snd_kernel_fork` is indeed a limit. -/
def biprod.is_kernel_snd_kernel_fork : is_limit (biprod.snd_kernel_fork X Y) :=
fork.is_limit.mk' _ $ λ s, ⟨s.ι ≫ biprod.fst, by ext; simp, λ m hm, by simp [← hm]⟩
/-- A cokernel cofork for the cokernel of `biprod.inl`. It consists of the
morphism `biprod.snd`. -/
def biprod.inl_cokernel_fork : cokernel_cofork (biprod.inl : X ⟶ X ⊞ Y) :=
cokernel_cofork.of_π biprod.snd biprod.inl_snd
@[simp]
lemma biprod.inl_cokernel_fork_π : cofork.π (biprod.inl_cokernel_fork X Y) = biprod.snd :=
rfl
/-- The cofork `biprod.inl_cokernel_fork` is indeed a colimit. -/
def biprod.is_cokernel_inl_cokernel_fork : is_colimit (biprod.inl_cokernel_fork X Y) :=
cofork.is_colimit.mk' _ $ λ s, ⟨biprod.inr ≫ s.π, by ext; simp, λ m hm, by simp [← hm]⟩
/-- A cokernel cofork for the cokernel of `biprod.inr`. It consists of the
morphism `biprod.fst`. -/
def biprod.inr_cokernel_fork : cokernel_cofork (biprod.inr : Y ⟶ X ⊞ Y) :=
cokernel_cofork.of_π biprod.fst biprod.inr_fst
@[simp]
lemma biprod.inr_cokernel_fork_π : cofork.π (biprod.inr_cokernel_fork X Y) = biprod.fst :=
rfl
/-- The cofork `biprod.inr_cokernel_fork` is indeed a colimit. -/
def biprod.is_cokernel_inr_cokernel_fork : is_colimit (biprod.inr_cokernel_fork X Y) :=
cofork.is_colimit.mk' _ $ λ s, ⟨biprod.inl ≫ s.π, by ext; simp, λ m hm, by simp [← hm]⟩
end biprod_kernel
section
variables [has_binary_biproducts C]
/-- The braiding isomorphism which swaps a binary biproduct. -/
@[simps] def biprod.braiding (P Q : C) : P ⊞ Q ≅ Q ⊞ P :=
{ hom := biprod.lift biprod.snd biprod.fst,
inv := biprod.lift biprod.snd biprod.fst }
/--
An alternative formula for the braiding isomorphism which swaps a binary biproduct,
using the fact that the biproduct is a coproduct.
-/
@[simps]
def biprod.braiding' (P Q : C) : P ⊞ Q ≅ Q ⊞ P :=
{ hom := biprod.desc biprod.inr biprod.inl,
inv := biprod.desc biprod.inr biprod.inl }
lemma biprod.braiding'_eq_braiding {P Q : C} :
biprod.braiding' P Q = biprod.braiding P Q :=
by tidy
/-- The braiding isomorphism can be passed through a map by swapping the order. -/
@[reassoc] lemma biprod.braid_natural {W X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Z ⟶ W) :
biprod.map f g ≫ (biprod.braiding _ _).hom = (biprod.braiding _ _).hom ≫ biprod.map g f :=
by tidy
@[reassoc] lemma biprod.braiding_map_braiding {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) :
(biprod.braiding X W).hom ≫ biprod.map f g ≫ (biprod.braiding Y Z).hom = biprod.map g f :=
by tidy
@[simp, reassoc] lemma biprod.symmetry' (P Q : C) :
biprod.lift biprod.snd biprod.fst ≫ biprod.lift biprod.snd biprod.fst = 𝟙 (P ⊞ Q) :=
by tidy
/-- The braiding isomorphism is symmetric. -/
@[reassoc] lemma biprod.symmetry (P Q : C) :
(biprod.braiding P Q).hom ≫ (biprod.braiding Q P).hom = 𝟙 _ :=
by simp
end
-- TODO:
-- If someone is interested, they could provide the constructions:
-- has_binary_biproducts ↔ has_finite_biproducts
end limits
namespace limits
section preadditive
variables {C : Type u} [category.{v} C] [preadditive C]
variables {J : Type v} [decidable_eq J] [fintype J]
open category_theory.preadditive
open_locale big_operators
/--
In a preadditive category, we can construct a biproduct for `f : J → C` from
any bicone `b` for `f` satisfying `total : ∑ j : J, b.π j ≫ b.ι j = 𝟙 b.X`.
(That is, such a bicone is a limit cone and a colimit cocone.)
-/
def is_bilimit_of_total {f : J → C} (b : bicone f) (total : ∑ j : J, b.π j ≫ b.ι j = 𝟙 b.X) :
b.is_bilimit :=
{ is_limit :=
{ lift := λ s, ∑ j, s.π.app j ≫ b.ι j,
uniq' := λ s m h,
begin
erw [←category.comp_id m, ←total, comp_sum],
apply finset.sum_congr rfl,
intros j m,
erw [reassoc_of (h j)],
end,
fac' := λ s j,
begin
simp only [sum_comp, category.assoc, bicone.to_cone_π_app, b.ι_π, comp_dite],
-- See note [dsimp, simp].
dsimp, simp,
end },
is_colimit :=
{ desc := λ s, ∑ j, b.π j ≫ s.ι.app j,
uniq' := λ s m h,
begin
erw [←category.id_comp m, ←total, sum_comp],
apply finset.sum_congr rfl,
intros j m,
erw [category.assoc, h],
end,
fac' := λ s j,
begin
simp only [comp_sum, ←category.assoc, bicone.to_cocone_ι_app, b.ι_π, dite_comp],
dsimp, simp,
end } }
lemma is_bilimit.total {f : J → C} {b : bicone f} (i : b.is_bilimit) :
∑ j : J, b.π j ≫ b.ι j = 𝟙 b.X :=
i.is_limit.hom_ext (λ j, by simp [sum_comp, b.ι_π, comp_dite])
/--
In a preadditive category, we can construct a biproduct for `f : J → C` from
any bicone `b` for `f` satisfying `total : ∑ j : J, b.π j ≫ b.ι j = 𝟙 b.X`.
(That is, such a bicone is a limit cone and a colimit cocone.)
-/
lemma has_biproduct_of_total {f : J → C} (b : bicone f) (total : ∑ j : J, b.π j ≫ b.ι j = 𝟙 b.X) :
has_biproduct f :=
has_biproduct.mk
{ bicone := b,
is_bilimit := is_bilimit_of_total b total }
/-- In a preadditive category, any finite bicone which is a limit cone is in fact a bilimit
bicone. -/
def is_bilimit_of_is_limit {f : J → C} (t : bicone f) (ht : is_limit t.to_cone) : t.is_bilimit :=
is_bilimit_of_total _ $ ht.hom_ext $ λ j, by simp [sum_comp, t.ι_π, dite_comp, comp_dite]
/-- We can turn any limit cone over a pair into a bilimit bicone. -/
def bicone_is_bilimit_of_limit_cone_of_is_limit {f : J → C} {t : cone (discrete.functor f)}
(ht : is_limit t) : (bicone.of_limit_cone ht).is_bilimit :=
is_bilimit_of_is_limit _ $ is_limit.of_iso_limit ht $ cones.ext (iso.refl _) (by tidy)
/-- In a preadditive category, if the product over `f : J → C` exists,
then the biproduct over `f` exists. -/
lemma has_biproduct.of_has_product (f : J → C) [has_product f] : has_biproduct f :=
has_biproduct.mk
{ bicone := _,
is_bilimit := bicone_is_bilimit_of_limit_cone_of_is_limit (limit.is_limit _) }
/-- In a preadditive category, any finite bicone which is a colimit cocone is in fact a bilimit
bicone. -/
def is_bilimit_of_is_colimit {f : J → C} (t : bicone f) (ht : is_colimit t.to_cocone) :
t.is_bilimit :=
is_bilimit_of_total _ $ ht.hom_ext $ λ j,
by { simp_rw [bicone.to_cocone_ι_app, comp_sum, ← category.assoc, t.ι_π, dite_comp], tidy }
/-- We can turn any limit cone over a pair into a bilimit bicone. -/
def bicone_is_bilimit_of_colimit_cocone_of_is_colimit {f : J → C} {t : cocone (discrete.functor f)}
(ht : is_colimit t) : (bicone.of_colimit_cocone ht).is_bilimit :=
is_bilimit_of_is_colimit _ $ is_colimit.of_iso_colimit ht $ cocones.ext (iso.refl _) (by tidy)
/-- In a preadditive category, if the coproduct over `f : J → C` exists,
then the biproduct over `f` exists. -/
lemma has_biproduct.of_has_coproduct (f : J → C) [has_coproduct f] : has_biproduct f :=
has_biproduct.mk
{ bicone := _,
is_bilimit := bicone_is_bilimit_of_colimit_cocone_of_is_colimit (colimit.is_colimit _) }
/-- A preadditive category with finite products has finite biproducts. -/
lemma has_finite_biproducts.of_has_finite_products [has_finite_products C] :
has_finite_biproducts C :=
⟨λ J _ _, { has_biproduct := λ F, by exactI has_biproduct.of_has_product _ }⟩
/-- A preadditive category with finite coproducts has finite biproducts. -/
lemma has_finite_biproducts.of_has_finite_coproducts [has_finite_coproducts C] :
has_finite_biproducts C :=
⟨λ J _ _, { has_biproduct := λ F, by exactI has_biproduct.of_has_coproduct _ }⟩
section
variables {f : J → C} [has_biproduct f]
/--
In any preadditive category, any biproduct satsifies
`∑ j : J, biproduct.π f j ≫ biproduct.ι f j = 𝟙 (⨁ f)`
-/
@[simp] lemma biproduct.total : ∑ j : J, biproduct.π f j ≫ biproduct.ι f j = 𝟙 (⨁ f) :=
is_bilimit.total (biproduct.is_bilimit _)
lemma biproduct.lift_eq {T : C} {g : Π j, T ⟶ f j} :
biproduct.lift g = ∑ j, g j ≫ biproduct.ι f j :=
begin
ext j,
simp [sum_comp, biproduct.ι_π, comp_dite],
end
lemma biproduct.desc_eq {T : C} {g : Π j, f j ⟶ T} :
biproduct.desc g = ∑ j, biproduct.π f j ≫ g j :=
begin
ext j,
simp [comp_sum, biproduct.ι_π_assoc, dite_comp],
end
@[simp, reassoc] lemma biproduct.lift_desc {T U : C} {g : Π j, T ⟶ f j} {h : Π j, f j ⟶ U} :
biproduct.lift g ≫ biproduct.desc h = ∑ j : J, g j ≫ h j :=
by simp [biproduct.lift_eq, biproduct.desc_eq, comp_sum, sum_comp, biproduct.ι_π_assoc,
comp_dite, dite_comp]
lemma biproduct.map_eq [has_finite_biproducts C] {f g : J → C} {h : Π j, f j ⟶ g j} :
biproduct.map h = ∑ j : J, biproduct.π f j ≫ h j ≫ biproduct.ι g j :=
begin
ext,
simp [biproduct.ι_π, biproduct.ι_π_assoc, comp_sum, sum_comp, comp_dite, dite_comp],
end
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma biproduct.matrix_desc
{K : Type v} [fintype K] [decidable_eq K] [has_finite_biproducts C]
{f : J → C} {g : K → C} (m : Π j k, f j ⟶ g k) {P} (x : Π k, g k ⟶ P) :
biproduct.matrix m ≫ biproduct.desc x = biproduct.desc (λ j, ∑ k, m j k ≫ x k) :=
by { ext, simp, }
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma biproduct.lift_matrix
{K : Type v} [fintype K] [decidable_eq K] [has_finite_biproducts C]
{f : J → C} {g : K → C} {P} (x : Π j, P ⟶ f j) (m : Π j k, f j ⟶ g k) :
biproduct.lift x ≫ biproduct.matrix m = biproduct.lift (λ k, ∑ j, x j ≫ m j k) :=
by { ext, simp, }
@[reassoc]
lemma biproduct.matrix_map
{K : Type v} [fintype K] [decidable_eq K] [has_finite_biproducts C]
{f : J → C} {g : K → C} {h : K → C} (m : Π j k, f j ⟶ g k) (n : Π k, g k ⟶ h k) :
biproduct.matrix m ≫ biproduct.map n = biproduct.matrix (λ j k, m j k ≫ n k) :=
by { ext, simp, }
@[reassoc]
lemma biproduct.map_matrix
{K : Type v} [fintype K] [decidable_eq K] [has_finite_biproducts C]
{f : J → C} {g : J → C} {h : K → C} (m : Π k, f k ⟶ g k) (n : Π j k, g j ⟶ h k) :
biproduct.map m ≫ biproduct.matrix n = biproduct.matrix (λ j k, m j ≫ n j k) :=
by { ext, simp, }
end
/--
In a preadditive category, we can construct a binary biproduct for `X Y : C` from
any binary bicone `b` satisfying `total : b.fst ≫ b.inl + b.snd ≫ b.inr = 𝟙 b.X`.
(That is, such a bicone is a limit cone and a colimit cocone.)
-/
def is_binary_bilimit_of_total {X Y : C} (b : binary_bicone X Y)
(total : b.fst ≫ b.inl + b.snd ≫ b.inr = 𝟙 b.X) : b.is_bilimit :=
{ is_limit :=
{ lift := λ s, binary_fan.fst s ≫ b.inl +
binary_fan.snd s ≫ b.inr,
uniq' := λ s m h, by erw [←category.comp_id m, ←total,
comp_add, reassoc_of (h walking_pair.left), reassoc_of (h walking_pair.right)],
fac' := λ s j, by cases j; simp, },
is_colimit :=
{ desc := λ s, b.fst ≫ binary_cofan.inl s +
b.snd ≫ binary_cofan.inr s,
uniq' := λ s m h, by erw [←category.id_comp m, ←total,
add_comp, category.assoc, category.assoc, h walking_pair.left, h walking_pair.right],
fac' := λ s j, by cases j; simp, } }
lemma is_bilimit.binary_total {X Y : C} {b : binary_bicone X Y} (i : b.is_bilimit) :
b.fst ≫ b.inl + b.snd ≫ b.inr = 𝟙 b.X :=
i.is_limit.hom_ext (λ j, by { cases j; simp, })
/--
In a preadditive category, we can construct a binary biproduct for `X Y : C` from
any binary bicone `b` satisfying `total : b.fst ≫ b.inl + b.snd ≫ b.inr = 𝟙 b.X`.
(That is, such a bicone is a limit cone and a colimit cocone.)
-/
lemma has_binary_biproduct_of_total {X Y : C} (b : binary_bicone X Y)
(total : b.fst ≫ b.inl + b.snd ≫ b.inr = 𝟙 b.X) : has_binary_biproduct X Y :=
has_binary_biproduct.mk
{ bicone := b,
is_bilimit := is_binary_bilimit_of_total b total }
/-- We can turn any limit cone over a pair into a bicone. -/
@[simps]
def binary_bicone.of_limit_cone {X Y : C} {t : cone (pair X Y)} (ht : is_limit t) :
binary_bicone X Y :=
{ X := t.X,
fst := t.π.app walking_pair.left,
snd := t.π.app walking_pair.right,
inl := ht.lift (binary_fan.mk (𝟙 X) 0),
inr := ht.lift (binary_fan.mk 0 (𝟙 Y)) }
lemma inl_of_is_limit {X Y : C} {t : binary_bicone X Y} (ht : is_limit t.to_cone) :
t.inl = ht.lift (binary_fan.mk (𝟙 X) 0) :=
ht.hom_ext $ λ j, by { rw ht.fac, cases j; simp }
lemma inr_of_is_limit {X Y : C} {t : binary_bicone X Y} (ht : is_limit t.to_cone) :
t.inr = ht.lift (binary_fan.mk 0 (𝟙 Y)) :=
ht.hom_ext $ λ j, by { rw ht.fac, cases j; simp }
/-- In a preadditive category, any binary bicone which is a limit cone is in fact a bilimit
bicone. -/
def is_binary_bilimit_of_is_limit {X Y : C} (t : binary_bicone X Y) (ht : is_limit t.to_cone) :
t.is_bilimit :=
is_binary_bilimit_of_total _ (by refine binary_fan.is_limit.hom_ext ht _ _; simp)
/-- We can turn any limit cone over a pair into a bilimit bicone. -/
def binary_bicone_is_bilimit_of_limit_cone_of_is_limit {X Y : C} {t : cone (pair X Y)}
(ht : is_limit t) : (binary_bicone.of_limit_cone ht).is_bilimit :=
is_binary_bilimit_of_total _ $ binary_fan.is_limit.hom_ext ht (by simp) (by simp)
/-- In a preadditive category, if the product of `X` and `Y` exists, then the
binary biproduct of `X` and `Y` exists. -/
lemma has_binary_biproduct.of_has_binary_product (X Y : C) [has_binary_product X Y] :
has_binary_biproduct X Y :=
has_binary_biproduct.mk
{ bicone := _,
is_bilimit := binary_bicone_is_bilimit_of_limit_cone_of_is_limit (limit.is_limit _) }
/-- In a preadditive category, if all binary products exist, then all binary biproducts exist. -/
lemma has_binary_biproducts.of_has_binary_products [has_binary_products C] :
has_binary_biproducts C :=
{ has_binary_biproduct := λ X Y, has_binary_biproduct.of_has_binary_product X Y, }
/-- We can turn any colimit cocone over a pair into a bicone. -/
@[simps]
def binary_bicone.of_colimit_cocone {X Y : C} {t : cocone (pair X Y)} (ht : is_colimit t) :
binary_bicone X Y :=
{ X := t.X,
fst := ht.desc (binary_cofan.mk (𝟙 X) 0),
snd := ht.desc (binary_cofan.mk 0 (𝟙 Y)),
inl := t.ι.app walking_pair.left,
inr := t.ι.app walking_pair.right }
lemma fst_of_is_colimit {X Y : C} {t : binary_bicone X Y} (ht : is_colimit t.to_cocone) :
t.fst = ht.desc (binary_cofan.mk (𝟙 X) 0) :=
begin
refine ht.hom_ext (λ j, _),
rw ht.fac,
cases j,
all_goals { simp only [binary_bicone.to_cocone_ι_app_left, binary_bicone.inl_fst,
binary_cofan.mk_ι_app_left, binary_bicone.to_cocone_ι_app_right, binary_bicone.inr_fst,
binary_cofan.mk_ι_app_right] },
refl
end
lemma snd_of_is_colimit {X Y : C} {t : binary_bicone X Y} (ht : is_colimit t.to_cocone) :
t.snd = ht.desc (binary_cofan.mk 0 (𝟙 Y)) :=
begin
refine ht.hom_ext (λ j, _),
rw ht.fac,
cases j,
all_goals { simp only [binary_bicone.to_cocone_ι_app_left, binary_bicone.inl_snd,
binary_cofan.mk_ι_app_left, binary_bicone.to_cocone_ι_app_right, binary_bicone.inr_snd,
binary_cofan.mk_ι_app_right] },
refl
end
/-- In a preadditive category, any binary bicone which is a colimit cocone is in fact a
bilimit bicone. -/
def is_binary_bilimit_of_is_colimit {X Y : C} (t : binary_bicone X Y)
(ht : is_colimit t.to_cocone) : t.is_bilimit :=
is_binary_bilimit_of_total _
begin
refine binary_cofan.is_colimit.hom_ext ht _ _; simp,
{ rw [category.comp_id t.inl] },
{ rw [category.comp_id t.inr] }
end
/-- We can turn any colimit cocone over a pair into a bilimit bicone. -/
def binary_bicone_is_bilimit_of_colimit_cocone_of_is_colimit {X Y : C} {t : cocone (pair X Y)}
(ht : is_colimit t) : (binary_bicone.of_colimit_cocone ht).is_bilimit :=
is_binary_bilimit_of_is_colimit (binary_bicone.of_colimit_cocone ht) $
is_colimit.of_iso_colimit ht $ cocones.ext (iso.refl _) $ λ j, by { cases j, tidy }
/-- In a preadditive category, if the coproduct of `X` and `Y` exists, then the
binary biproduct of `X` and `Y` exists. -/
lemma has_binary_biproduct.of_has_binary_coproduct (X Y : C) [has_binary_coproduct X Y] :
has_binary_biproduct X Y :=
has_binary_biproduct.mk
{ bicone := _,
is_bilimit := binary_bicone_is_bilimit_of_colimit_cocone_of_is_colimit (colimit.is_colimit _) }
/-- In a preadditive category, if all binary coproducts exist, then all binary biproducts exist. -/
lemma has_binary_biproducts.of_has_binary_coproducts [has_binary_coproducts C] :
has_binary_biproducts C :=
{ has_binary_biproduct := λ X Y, has_binary_biproduct.of_has_binary_coproduct X Y, }
section
variables {X Y : C} [has_binary_biproduct X Y]
/--
In any preadditive category, any binary biproduct satsifies
`biprod.fst ≫ biprod.inl + biprod.snd ≫ biprod.inr = 𝟙 (X ⊞ Y)`.
-/
@[simp] lemma biprod.total : biprod.fst ≫ biprod.inl + biprod.snd ≫ biprod.inr = 𝟙 (X ⊞ Y) :=
begin
ext; simp [add_comp],
end
lemma biprod.lift_eq {T : C} {f : T ⟶ X} {g : T ⟶ Y} :
biprod.lift f g = f ≫ biprod.inl + g ≫ biprod.inr :=
begin
ext; simp [add_comp],
end
lemma biprod.desc_eq {T : C} {f : X ⟶ T} {g : Y ⟶ T} :
biprod.desc f g = biprod.fst ≫ f + biprod.snd ≫ g :=
begin
ext; simp [add_comp],
end
@[simp, reassoc] lemma biprod.lift_desc {T U : C} {f : T ⟶ X} {g : T ⟶ Y} {h : X ⟶ U} {i : Y ⟶ U} :
biprod.lift f g ≫ biprod.desc h i = f ≫ h + g ≫ i :=
by simp [biprod.lift_eq, biprod.desc_eq]
lemma biprod.map_eq [has_binary_biproducts C] {W X Y Z : C} {f : W ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} :
biprod.map f g = biprod.fst ≫ f ≫ biprod.inl + biprod.snd ≫ g ≫ biprod.inr :=
by apply biprod.hom_ext; apply biprod.hom_ext'; simp
/--
Every split mono `f` with a cokernel induces a binary bicone with `f` as its `inl` and
the cokernel map as its `snd`.
We will show in `is_bilimit_binary_bicone_of_split_mono_of_cokernel` that this binary bicone is in
fact already a biproduct. -/
@[simps]
def binary_bicone_of_split_mono_of_cokernel {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} [split_mono f]
{c : cokernel_cofork f} (i : is_colimit c) : binary_bicone X c.X :=
{ X := Y,
fst := retraction f,
snd := c.π,
inl := f,
inr :=
let c' : cokernel_cofork (𝟙 Y - (𝟙 Y - retraction f ≫ f)) :=
cokernel_cofork.of_π (cofork.π c) (by simp) in
let i' : is_colimit c' := is_cokernel_epi_comp i (retraction f) (by simp) in
let i'' := is_colimit_cofork_of_cokernel_cofork i' in
(split_epi_of_idempotent_of_is_colimit_cofork C (by simp) i'').section_,
inl_fst' := by simp,
inl_snd' := by simp,
inr_fst' :=
begin
dsimp only,
rw [split_epi_of_idempotent_of_is_colimit_cofork_section_,
is_colimit_cofork_of_cokernel_cofork_desc, is_cokernel_epi_comp_desc],
dsimp only [cokernel_cofork_of_cofork_of_π],
letI := epi_of_is_colimit_cofork i,
apply zero_of_epi_comp c.π,
simp only [sub_comp, comp_sub, category.comp_id, category.assoc, split_mono.id, sub_self,
cofork.is_colimit.π_comp_desc_assoc, cokernel_cofork.π_of_π, split_mono.id_assoc],
apply sub_eq_zero_of_eq,
apply category.id_comp
end,
inr_snd' := by apply split_epi.id }
/-- The bicone constructed in `binary_bicone_of_split_mono_of_cokernel` is a bilimit.
This is a version of the splitting lemma that holds in all preadditive categories. -/
def is_bilimit_binary_bicone_of_split_mono_of_cokernel {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} [split_mono f]
{c : cokernel_cofork f} (i : is_colimit c) :
(binary_bicone_of_split_mono_of_cokernel i).is_bilimit :=
is_binary_bilimit_of_total _
begin
simp only [binary_bicone_of_split_mono_of_cokernel_fst,
binary_bicone_of_split_mono_of_cokernel_inr, binary_bicone_of_split_mono_of_cokernel_snd,
split_epi_of_idempotent_of_is_colimit_cofork_section_],
dsimp only [binary_bicone_of_split_mono_of_cokernel_X],
rw [is_colimit_cofork_of_cokernel_cofork_desc, is_cokernel_epi_comp_desc],
simp only [binary_bicone_of_split_mono_of_cokernel_inl, cofork.is_colimit.π_comp_desc,
cokernel_cofork_of_cofork_π, cofork.π_of_π, add_sub_cancel'_right]
end
/--
Every split epi `f` with a kernel induces a binary bicone with `f` as its `snd` and
the kernel map as its `inl`.
We will show in `binary_bicone_of_split_mono_of_cokernel` that this binary bicone is in fact
already a biproduct. -/
@[simps]
def binary_bicone_of_split_epi_of_kernel {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} [split_epi f]
{c : kernel_fork f} (i : is_limit c) : binary_bicone c.X Y :=
{ X := X,
fst :=
let c' : kernel_fork (𝟙 X - (𝟙 X - f ≫ section_ f)) :=
kernel_fork.of_ι (fork.ι c) (by simp) in
let i' : is_limit c' := is_kernel_comp_mono i (section_ f) (by simp) in
let i'' := is_limit_fork_of_kernel_fork i' in
(split_mono_of_idempotent_of_is_limit_fork C (by simp) i'').retraction,
snd := f,
inl := c.ι,
inr := section_ f,
inl_fst' := by apply split_mono.id,
inl_snd' := by simp,
inr_fst' :=
begin
dsimp only,
rw [split_mono_of_idempotent_of_is_limit_fork_retraction,
is_limit_fork_of_kernel_fork_lift, is_kernel_comp_mono_lift],
dsimp only [kernel_fork_of_fork_ι],
letI := mono_of_is_limit_fork i,
apply zero_of_comp_mono c.ι,
simp only [comp_sub, category.comp_id, category.assoc, sub_self, fork.is_limit.lift_comp_ι,
fork.ι_of_ι, split_epi.id_assoc]
end,
inr_snd' := by simp }
/-- The bicone constructed in `binary_bicone_of_split_epi_of_kernel` is a bilimit.
This is a version of the splitting lemma that holds in all preadditive categories. -/
def is_bilimit_binary_bicone_of_split_epi_of_kernel {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} [split_epi f]
{c : kernel_fork f} (i : is_limit c) :
(binary_bicone_of_split_epi_of_kernel i).is_bilimit :=
is_binary_bilimit_of_total _
begin
simp only [binary_bicone_of_split_epi_of_kernel_fst, binary_bicone_of_split_epi_of_kernel_inl,
binary_bicone_of_split_epi_of_kernel_inr, binary_bicone_of_split_epi_of_kernel_snd,
split_mono_of_idempotent_of_is_limit_fork_retraction],
dsimp only [binary_bicone_of_split_epi_of_kernel_X],
rw [is_limit_fork_of_kernel_fork_lift, is_kernel_comp_mono_lift],
simp only [fork.is_limit.lift_comp_ι, fork.ι_of_ι, kernel_fork_of_fork_ι, sub_add_cancel]
end
end
section
variables {X Y : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y)
/-- The existence of binary biproducts implies that there is at most one preadditive structure. -/
lemma biprod.add_eq_lift_id_desc [has_binary_biproduct X X] :
f + g = biprod.lift (𝟙 X) (𝟙 X) ≫ biprod.desc f g :=
by simp
/-- The existence of binary biproducts implies that there is at most one preadditive structure. -/
lemma biprod.add_eq_lift_desc_id [has_binary_biproduct Y Y] :
f + g = biprod.lift f g ≫ biprod.desc (𝟙 Y) (𝟙 Y) :=
by simp
end
end preadditive
end limits
open category_theory.limits
section
local attribute [ext] preadditive
/-- The existence of binary biproducts implies that there is at most one preadditive structure. -/
instance subsingleton_preadditive_of_has_binary_biproducts {C : Type u} [category.{v} C]
[has_zero_morphisms C] [has_binary_biproducts C] : subsingleton (preadditive C) :=
subsingleton.intro $ λ a b,
begin
ext X Y f g,
have h₁ := @biprod.add_eq_lift_id_desc _ _ a _ _ f g
(by convert (infer_instance : has_binary_biproduct X X)),
have h₂ := @biprod.add_eq_lift_id_desc _ _ b _ _ f g
(by convert (infer_instance : has_binary_biproduct X X)),
refine h₁.trans (eq.trans _ h₂.symm),
congr' 2;
exact subsingleton.elim _ _
end
end
variables {C : Type u} [category.{v} C] [has_zero_morphisms C] [has_binary_biproducts C]
/-- An object is indecomposable if it cannot be written as the biproduct of two nonzero objects. -/
def indecomposable (X : C) : Prop := ¬ is_zero X ∧ ∀ Y Z, (X ≅ Y ⊞ Z) → is_zero Y ∨ is_zero Z
end category_theory
|
e3f77b56145bb8c6b8a5b0be54d2b625ce04f150 | cbcb0199842f03e7606d4e43666573fc15dd07a5 | /src/algebra/roption_instances.lean | 902452e844c7d2e8f474cad50a2d0fc90542abc1 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | truonghoangle/mathlib | a6a7c14b3767ec71156239d8ea97f6921fe79627 | 673bae584febcd830c2c9256eb7e7a81e27ed303 | refs/heads/master | 1,590,347,998,944 | 1,559,728,860,000 | 1,559,728,860,000 | 187,431,971 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,558,238,525,000 | 1,558,238,525,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,525 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Hoang Le Truong. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author : Hoang Le Truong.
If α is a semigroup, a comm_semigroup, a comm_monoid,a add_semigroup, a add_comm_semigroup, a add_comm_monoid,
a mul_action, a distrib_mul_action, so is roption α.
-/
import algebra.module data.pfun
namespace roption
universes u v w
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
noncomputable theory
instance [has_zero α] : has_zero (roption α) := ⟨some (0 : α)⟩
lemma zero_def [has_zero α] : (0 : roption α) = ⟨true, λ _, (0 : α)⟩ := rfl
instance [has_one α] : has_one (roption α) := ⟨some (1 : α)⟩
lemma one_def [has_one α] : (1 : roption α) = ⟨true, λ _, (1 : α)⟩ := rfl
attribute [to_additive roption.has_zero] roption.has_one
attribute [to_additive roption.zero_def] roption.one_def
instance [has_add α] : has_add (roption α) := ⟨λ x y, ⟨x.dom ∧ y.dom, λ h, x.get (h.1)+ y.get (h.2)⟩⟩
lemma add_def [has_add α] (x y : roption α) : x+y = ⟨x.dom ∧ y.dom, λ h, x.get (h.1)+ y.get (h.2)⟩ := rfl
instance [has_mul α] : has_mul (roption α) := ⟨λ x y, ⟨x.dom ∧ y.dom, λ h, x.get (h.1) * y.get (h.2)⟩⟩
lemma mul_def [has_mul α] (x y : roption α) : x * y = ⟨x.dom ∧ y.dom , λ h, x.get (h.1) * y.get (h.2)⟩ := rfl
attribute [to_additive roption.has_add] roption.has_mul
attribute [to_additive roption.add_def] roption.mul_def
instance [has_scalar α β] : has_scalar α (roption β) := ⟨λ a f, ⟨f.dom, λ h, a • (f.get h)⟩⟩
lemma smul_def [has_scalar α β] (a : α) (x : roption β) : a • x = ⟨x.dom , λ h, a • x.get h⟩ := rfl
instance semigroup [semigroup α] : semigroup (roption α) :=
{ mul_assoc := λ x y z, roption.ext' and.assoc (λ _ _, mul_assoc _ _ _),
..roption.has_mul}
instance comm_semigroup [comm_semigroup α] : comm_semigroup (roption α) :=
{ mul_comm := λ x y, roption.ext' and.comm (λ _ _, mul_comm _ _)
..roption.semigroup}
instance monoid [monoid α] : monoid (roption α) :=
{ monoid.
mul := roption.has_mul.mul,
mul_assoc := λ x y z, roption.ext' and.assoc (λ _ _, mul_assoc _ _ _),
one := roption.has_one.one,
one_mul := λ x, roption.ext' (true_and _) (λ _ _, one_mul _),
mul_one := λ x, roption.ext' (and_true _) (λ _ _, mul_one _)}
instance comm_monoid [comm_monoid α] : comm_monoid (roption α) :=
{ mul_comm := λ x y, roption.ext' and.comm (λ _ _, mul_comm _ _),
..roption.monoid}
attribute [to_additive roption.add_semigroup._proof_1] roption.semigroup._proof_1
attribute [to_additive roption.add_semigroup] roption.semigroup
attribute [to_additive roption.add_monoid._proof_1] roption.monoid._proof_1
attribute [to_additive roption.add_monoid._proof_2] roption.monoid._proof_2
attribute [to_additive roption.add_monoid._proof_3] roption.monoid._proof_3
attribute [to_additive roption.add_monoid'] roption.monoid
attribute [to_additive roption.add_comm_semigroup._proof_1] roption.comm_semigroup._proof_1
attribute [to_additive roption.add_comm_semigroup._proof_2] roption.comm_semigroup._proof_2
attribute [to_additive roption.add_comm_semigroup] roption.comm_semigroup
attribute [to_additive roption.add_comm_monoid._proof_1] roption.comm_monoid._proof_1
attribute [to_additive roption.add_comm_monoid._proof_2] roption.comm_monoid._proof_2
attribute [to_additive roption.add_comm_monoid._proof_3] roption.comm_monoid._proof_3
attribute [to_additive roption.add_comm_monoid._proof_4] roption.comm_monoid._proof_4
attribute [to_additive roption.add_comm_monoid] roption.comm_monoid
instance [monoid β] [mul_action β α] : mul_action β (roption α) :=
{ one_smul := λ x, roption.ext' (by simp[one_def,smul_def]) (by { intros, simp[smul_def,one_def,one_smul]}),
mul_smul := λ a b x, roption.ext' (by simp[smul_def]) (by { intros, simp[smul_def,mul_smul]}),
..roption.has_scalar}
instance [monoid β] [add_monoid α] [distrib_mul_action β α] : distrib_mul_action β (roption α) :=
{ smul_add := λ a x y, roption.ext' (by simp[add_def,smul_def]) (by{ intros, simp[smul_def,add_def,smul_add]}),
smul_zero := λ x, roption.ext' (by simp[zero_def,smul_def]) (by{ intros, simp[smul_def,zero_def,smul_zero]}),
..roption.mul_action}
end roption
|
6b6b133ca840e3973dfd2e15df8e318cd961bbae | 57aec6ee746bc7e3a3dd5e767e53bd95beb82f6d | /tests/bench/rbmap2.lean | 58fff6a1124e531447277c8c6bbcd1e2832f1969 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | collares/lean4 | 861a9269c4592bce49b71059e232ff0bfe4594cc | 52a4f535d853a2c7c7eea5fee8a4fa04c682c1ee | refs/heads/master | 1,691,419,031,324 | 1,618,678,138,000 | 1,618,678,138,000 | 358,989,750 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,618,696,333,000 | 1,618,696,333,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,898 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import init.coe init.data.option.basic init.system.io
universes u v w w'
inductive color
| Red | Black
inductive Tree
| Leaf {} : Tree
| Node (color : color) (lchild : Tree) (key : Nat) (val : Bool) (rchild : Tree) : Tree
variable {σ : Type w}
open color Nat Tree
def fold (f : Nat → Bool → σ → σ) : Tree → σ → σ
| Leaf, b => b
| Node _ l k v r, b => fold r (f k v (fold l b))
def balance1 : Tree → Tree → Tree
| Node _ _ kv vv t, Node _ (Node Red l kx vx r₁) ky vy r₂ => Node Red (Node Black l kx vx r₁) ky vy (Node Black r₂ kv vv t)
| Node _ _ kv vv t, Node _ l₁ ky vy (Node Red l₂ kx vx r) => Node Red (Node Black l₁ ky vy l₂) kx vx (Node Black r kv vv t)
| Node _ _ kv vv t, Node _ l ky vy r => Node Black (Node Red l ky vy r) kv vv t
| _, _ => Leaf
def balance2 : Tree → Tree → Tree
| Node _ t kv vv _, Node _ (Node Red l kx₁ vx₁ r₁) ky vy r₂ => Node Red (Node Black t kv vv l) kx₁ vx₁ (Node Black r₁ ky vy r₂)
| Node _ t kv vv _, Node _ l₁ ky vy (Node Red l₂ kx₂ vx₂ r₂) => Node Red (Node Black t kv vv l₁) ky vy (Node Black l₂ kx₂ vx₂ r₂)
| Node _ t kv vv _, Node _ l ky vy r => Node Black t kv vv (Node Red l ky vy r)
| _, _ => Leaf
def isRed : Tree → Bool
| Node Red _ _ _ _ => true
| _ => false
def ins : Tree → Nat → Bool → Tree
| Leaf, kx, vx => Node Red Leaf kx vx Leaf
| Node Red a ky vy b, kx, vx =>
(if kx < ky then Node Red (ins a kx vx) ky vy b
else if kx = ky then Node Red a kx vx b
else Node Red a ky vy (ins b kx vx))
| Node Black a ky vy b, kx, vx =>
if kx < ky then
(if isRed a then balance1 (Node Black Leaf ky vy b) (ins a kx vx)
else Node Black (ins a kx vx) ky vy b)
else if kx = ky then Node Black a kx vx b
else if isRed b then balance2 (Node Black a ky vy Leaf) (ins b kx vx)
else Node Black a ky vy (ins b kx vx)
def setBlack : Tree → Tree
| Node _ l k v r => Node Black l k v r
| e => e
def insert (t : Tree) (k : Nat) (v : Bool) : Tree :=
if isRed t then setBlack (ins t k v)
else ins t k v
def mkMapAux : Nat → Tree → Tree
| 0, m => m
| n+1, m => mkMapAux n (insert m n (n % 10 = 0))
def mkMap (n : Nat) :=
mkMapAux n Leaf
def main (xs : List String) : IO UInt32 :=
let m := mkMap xs.head.toNat;
let v := fold (fun (k : Nat) (v : Bool) (r : Nat) => if v then r + 1 else r) m 0;
IO.println (toString v) *>
pure 0
|
c3ed255485e18de468ec3bde0bbca24f9006a73b | d0c6b2ba2af981e9ab0a98f6e169262caad4b9b9 | /tests/lean/run/whileRepeat.lean | 3f1f157383837604e7920e94ddb88b7e86f7499c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | fizruk/lean4 | 953b7dcd76e78c17a0743a2c1a918394ab64bbc0 | 545ed50f83c570f772ade4edbe7d38a078cbd761 | refs/heads/master | 1,677,655,987,815 | 1,612,393,885,000 | 1,612,393,885,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,208 | lean | structure Loop where
@[inline]
partial def Loop.forIn {β : Type u} {m : Type u → Type v} [Monad m] (loop : Loop) (init : β) (f : Unit → β → m (ForInStep β)) : m β :=
let rec @[specialize] loop (b : β) : m β := do
match ← f () b with
| ForInStep.done b => pure b
| ForInStep.yield b => loop b
loop init
syntax "repeat " doSeq : doElem
macro_rules
| `(doElem| repeat $seq) => `(doElem| for _ in Loop.mk do $seq)
syntax "while " termBeforeDo " do " doSeq : doElem
macro_rules
| `(doElem| while $cond do $seq) =>
`(doElem| repeat if $cond then $seq else break)
def test1 : IO Unit := do
let mut i := 0
while i < 10 do
println! "{i}"
i := i + 1
println! "test1 done {i}"
#eval test1
syntax "repeat " doSeq " until " term : doElem
macro_rules
| `(doElem| repeat $seq until $cond) =>
`(doElem| repeat do $seq; if $cond then break)
def test2 : IO Unit := do
let mut i := 0
repeat
println! "{i}"
i := i + 1
until i >= 10
println! "test2 done {i}"
#eval test2
def test3 : IO Unit := do
let mut i := 0
repeat
println! "{i}"
if i > 10 && i % 3 == 0 then break
i := i + 1
println! "test3 done {i}"
#eval test3
|
6462db50135cab993b187065e60c1eb500afb6a3 | bbecf0f1968d1fba4124103e4f6b55251d08e9c4 | /src/data/nat/choose/dvd.lean | 78200b71d7dff5100fb5ca70a90115bc4670d4b3 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | waynemunro/mathlib | e3fd4ff49f4cb43d4a8ded59d17be407bc5ee552 | 065a70810b5480d584033f7bbf8e0409480c2118 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,417,182,397 | 1,634,644,781,000 | 1,634,644,781,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,228 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Patrick Stevens
-/
import data.nat.choose.basic
import data.nat.prime
/-!
# Divisibility properties of binomial coefficients
-/
namespace nat
open_locale nat
namespace prime
lemma dvd_choose_add {p a b : ℕ} (hap : a < p) (hbp : b < p) (h : p ≤ a + b)
(hp : prime p) : p ∣ choose (a + b) a :=
have h₁ : p ∣ (a + b)!, from hp.dvd_factorial.2 h,
have h₂ : ¬p ∣ a!, from mt hp.dvd_factorial.1 (not_le_of_gt hap),
have h₃ : ¬p ∣ b!, from mt hp.dvd_factorial.1 (not_le_of_gt hbp),
by
rw [← choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (le.intro rfl), mul_assoc, hp.dvd_mul, hp.dvd_mul,
nat.add_sub_cancel_left a b] at h₁;
exact h₁.resolve_right (not_or_distrib.2 ⟨h₂, h₃⟩)
lemma dvd_choose_self {p k : ℕ} (hk : 0 < k) (hkp : k < p) (hp : prime p) :
p ∣ choose p k :=
begin
have r : k + (p - k) = p,
by rw [← nat.add_sub_assoc (nat.le_of_lt hkp) k, nat.add_sub_cancel_left],
have e : p ∣ choose (k + (p - k)) k,
by exact dvd_choose_add hkp (nat.sub_lt (hk.trans hkp) hk) (by rw r) hp,
rwa r at e,
end
end prime
end nat
|
5bdbfa5afbea017bb9e4800f771e824bf0571bd0 | 592ee40978ac7604005a4e0d35bbc4b467389241 | /Library/generated/mathscheme-lean/NonassociativeNondistributiveRing.lean | 16af8e2eb03352bfb7cb4ce85a1c9eb02fbc01bd | [] | no_license | ysharoda/Deriving-Definitions | 3e149e6641fae440badd35ac110a0bd705a49ad2 | dfecb27572022de3d4aa702cae8db19957523a59 | refs/heads/master | 1,679,127,857,700 | 1,615,939,007,000 | 1,615,939,007,000 | 229,785,731 | 4 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,959 | lean | import init.data.nat.basic
import init.data.fin.basic
import data.vector
import .Prelude
open Staged
open nat
open fin
open vector
section NonassociativeNondistributiveRing
structure NonassociativeNondistributiveRing (A : Type) : Type :=
(times : (A → (A → A)))
(one : A)
(lunit_one : (∀ {x : A} , (times one x) = x))
(runit_one : (∀ {x : A} , (times x one) = x))
(associative_times : (∀ {x y z : A} , (times (times x y) z) = (times x (times y z))))
(inv : (A → A))
(leftInverse_inv_op_one : (∀ {x : A} , (times x (inv x)) = one))
(rightInverse_inv_op_one : (∀ {x : A} , (times (inv x) x) = one))
(commutative_times : (∀ {x y : A} , (times x y) = (times y x)))
(plus : (A → (A → A)))
open NonassociativeNondistributiveRing
structure Sig (AS : Type) : Type :=
(timesS : (AS → (AS → AS)))
(oneS : AS)
(invS : (AS → AS))
(plusS : (AS → (AS → AS)))
structure Product (A : Type) : Type :=
(timesP : ((Prod A A) → ((Prod A A) → (Prod A A))))
(oneP : (Prod A A))
(invP : ((Prod A A) → (Prod A A)))
(plusP : ((Prod A A) → ((Prod A A) → (Prod A A))))
(lunit_1P : (∀ {xP : (Prod A A)} , (timesP oneP xP) = xP))
(runit_1P : (∀ {xP : (Prod A A)} , (timesP xP oneP) = xP))
(associative_timesP : (∀ {xP yP zP : (Prod A A)} , (timesP (timesP xP yP) zP) = (timesP xP (timesP yP zP))))
(leftInverse_inv_op_1P : (∀ {xP : (Prod A A)} , (timesP xP (invP xP)) = oneP))
(rightInverse_inv_op_1P : (∀ {xP : (Prod A A)} , (timesP (invP xP) xP) = oneP))
(commutative_timesP : (∀ {xP yP : (Prod A A)} , (timesP xP yP) = (timesP yP xP)))
structure Hom {A1 : Type} {A2 : Type} (No1 : (NonassociativeNondistributiveRing A1)) (No2 : (NonassociativeNondistributiveRing A2)) : Type :=
(hom : (A1 → A2))
(pres_times : (∀ {x1 x2 : A1} , (hom ((times No1) x1 x2)) = ((times No2) (hom x1) (hom x2))))
(pres_one : (hom (one No1)) = (one No2))
(pres_inv : (∀ {x1 : A1} , (hom ((inv No1) x1)) = ((inv No2) (hom x1))))
(pres_plus : (∀ {x1 x2 : A1} , (hom ((plus No1) x1 x2)) = ((plus No2) (hom x1) (hom x2))))
structure RelInterp {A1 : Type} {A2 : Type} (No1 : (NonassociativeNondistributiveRing A1)) (No2 : (NonassociativeNondistributiveRing A2)) : Type 1 :=
(interp : (A1 → (A2 → Type)))
(interp_times : (∀ {x1 x2 : A1} {y1 y2 : A2} , ((interp x1 y1) → ((interp x2 y2) → (interp ((times No1) x1 x2) ((times No2) y1 y2))))))
(interp_one : (interp (one No1) (one No2)))
(interp_inv : (∀ {x1 : A1} {y1 : A2} , ((interp x1 y1) → (interp ((inv No1) x1) ((inv No2) y1)))))
(interp_plus : (∀ {x1 x2 : A1} {y1 y2 : A2} , ((interp x1 y1) → ((interp x2 y2) → (interp ((plus No1) x1 x2) ((plus No2) y1 y2))))))
inductive NonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm : Type
| timesL : (NonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm → (NonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm → NonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm))
| oneL : NonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm
| invL : (NonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm → NonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm)
| plusL : (NonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm → (NonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm → NonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm))
open NonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm
inductive ClNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm (A : Type) : Type
| sing : (A → ClNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm)
| timesCl : (ClNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm → (ClNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm → ClNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm))
| oneCl : ClNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm
| invCl : (ClNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm → ClNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm)
| plusCl : (ClNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm → (ClNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm → ClNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm))
open ClNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm
inductive OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm (n : ℕ) : Type
| v : ((fin n) → OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm)
| timesOL : (OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm → (OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm → OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm))
| oneOL : OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm
| invOL : (OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm → OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm)
| plusOL : (OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm → (OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm → OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm))
open OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm
inductive OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm2 (n : ℕ) (A : Type) : Type
| v2 : ((fin n) → OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm2)
| sing2 : (A → OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm2)
| timesOL2 : (OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm2 → (OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm2 → OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm2))
| oneOL2 : OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm2
| invOL2 : (OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm2 → OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm2)
| plusOL2 : (OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm2 → (OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm2 → OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm2))
open OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm2
def simplifyCl {A : Type} : ((ClNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm A) → (ClNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm A))
| (timesCl oneCl x) := x
| (timesCl x oneCl) := x
| (timesCl x1 x2) := (timesCl (simplifyCl x1) (simplifyCl x2))
| oneCl := oneCl
| (invCl x1) := (invCl (simplifyCl x1))
| (plusCl x1 x2) := (plusCl (simplifyCl x1) (simplifyCl x2))
| (sing x1) := (sing x1)
def simplifyOpB {n : ℕ} : ((OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm n) → (OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm n))
| (timesOL oneOL x) := x
| (timesOL x oneOL) := x
| (timesOL x1 x2) := (timesOL (simplifyOpB x1) (simplifyOpB x2))
| oneOL := oneOL
| (invOL x1) := (invOL (simplifyOpB x1))
| (plusOL x1 x2) := (plusOL (simplifyOpB x1) (simplifyOpB x2))
| (v x1) := (v x1)
def simplifyOp {n : ℕ} {A : Type} : ((OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm2 n A) → (OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm2 n A))
| (timesOL2 oneOL2 x) := x
| (timesOL2 x oneOL2) := x
| (timesOL2 x1 x2) := (timesOL2 (simplifyOp x1) (simplifyOp x2))
| oneOL2 := oneOL2
| (invOL2 x1) := (invOL2 (simplifyOp x1))
| (plusOL2 x1 x2) := (plusOL2 (simplifyOp x1) (simplifyOp x2))
| (v2 x1) := (v2 x1)
| (sing2 x1) := (sing2 x1)
def evalB {A : Type} : ((NonassociativeNondistributiveRing A) → (NonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm → A))
| No (timesL x1 x2) := ((times No) (evalB No x1) (evalB No x2))
| No oneL := (one No)
| No (invL x1) := ((inv No) (evalB No x1))
| No (plusL x1 x2) := ((plus No) (evalB No x1) (evalB No x2))
def evalCl {A : Type} : ((NonassociativeNondistributiveRing A) → ((ClNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm A) → A))
| No (sing x1) := x1
| No (timesCl x1 x2) := ((times No) (evalCl No x1) (evalCl No x2))
| No oneCl := (one No)
| No (invCl x1) := ((inv No) (evalCl No x1))
| No (plusCl x1 x2) := ((plus No) (evalCl No x1) (evalCl No x2))
def evalOpB {A : Type} {n : ℕ} : ((NonassociativeNondistributiveRing A) → ((vector A n) → ((OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm n) → A)))
| No vars (v x1) := (nth vars x1)
| No vars (timesOL x1 x2) := ((times No) (evalOpB No vars x1) (evalOpB No vars x2))
| No vars oneOL := (one No)
| No vars (invOL x1) := ((inv No) (evalOpB No vars x1))
| No vars (plusOL x1 x2) := ((plus No) (evalOpB No vars x1) (evalOpB No vars x2))
def evalOp {A : Type} {n : ℕ} : ((NonassociativeNondistributiveRing A) → ((vector A n) → ((OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm2 n A) → A)))
| No vars (v2 x1) := (nth vars x1)
| No vars (sing2 x1) := x1
| No vars (timesOL2 x1 x2) := ((times No) (evalOp No vars x1) (evalOp No vars x2))
| No vars oneOL2 := (one No)
| No vars (invOL2 x1) := ((inv No) (evalOp No vars x1))
| No vars (plusOL2 x1 x2) := ((plus No) (evalOp No vars x1) (evalOp No vars x2))
def inductionB {P : (NonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm → Type)} : ((∀ (x1 x2 : NonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm) , ((P x1) → ((P x2) → (P (timesL x1 x2))))) → ((P oneL) → ((∀ (x1 : NonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm) , ((P x1) → (P (invL x1)))) → ((∀ (x1 x2 : NonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm) , ((P x1) → ((P x2) → (P (plusL x1 x2))))) → (∀ (x : NonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm) , (P x))))))
| ptimesl p1l pinvl pplusl (timesL x1 x2) := (ptimesl _ _ (inductionB ptimesl p1l pinvl pplusl x1) (inductionB ptimesl p1l pinvl pplusl x2))
| ptimesl p1l pinvl pplusl oneL := p1l
| ptimesl p1l pinvl pplusl (invL x1) := (pinvl _ (inductionB ptimesl p1l pinvl pplusl x1))
| ptimesl p1l pinvl pplusl (plusL x1 x2) := (pplusl _ _ (inductionB ptimesl p1l pinvl pplusl x1) (inductionB ptimesl p1l pinvl pplusl x2))
def inductionCl {A : Type} {P : ((ClNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm A) → Type)} : ((∀ (x1 : A) , (P (sing x1))) → ((∀ (x1 x2 : (ClNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm A)) , ((P x1) → ((P x2) → (P (timesCl x1 x2))))) → ((P oneCl) → ((∀ (x1 : (ClNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm A)) , ((P x1) → (P (invCl x1)))) → ((∀ (x1 x2 : (ClNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm A)) , ((P x1) → ((P x2) → (P (plusCl x1 x2))))) → (∀ (x : (ClNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm A)) , (P x)))))))
| psing ptimescl p1cl pinvcl ppluscl (sing x1) := (psing x1)
| psing ptimescl p1cl pinvcl ppluscl (timesCl x1 x2) := (ptimescl _ _ (inductionCl psing ptimescl p1cl pinvcl ppluscl x1) (inductionCl psing ptimescl p1cl pinvcl ppluscl x2))
| psing ptimescl p1cl pinvcl ppluscl oneCl := p1cl
| psing ptimescl p1cl pinvcl ppluscl (invCl x1) := (pinvcl _ (inductionCl psing ptimescl p1cl pinvcl ppluscl x1))
| psing ptimescl p1cl pinvcl ppluscl (plusCl x1 x2) := (ppluscl _ _ (inductionCl psing ptimescl p1cl pinvcl ppluscl x1) (inductionCl psing ptimescl p1cl pinvcl ppluscl x2))
def inductionOpB {n : ℕ} {P : ((OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm n) → Type)} : ((∀ (fin : (fin n)) , (P (v fin))) → ((∀ (x1 x2 : (OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm n)) , ((P x1) → ((P x2) → (P (timesOL x1 x2))))) → ((P oneOL) → ((∀ (x1 : (OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm n)) , ((P x1) → (P (invOL x1)))) → ((∀ (x1 x2 : (OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm n)) , ((P x1) → ((P x2) → (P (plusOL x1 x2))))) → (∀ (x : (OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm n)) , (P x)))))))
| pv ptimesol p1ol pinvol pplusol (v x1) := (pv x1)
| pv ptimesol p1ol pinvol pplusol (timesOL x1 x2) := (ptimesol _ _ (inductionOpB pv ptimesol p1ol pinvol pplusol x1) (inductionOpB pv ptimesol p1ol pinvol pplusol x2))
| pv ptimesol p1ol pinvol pplusol oneOL := p1ol
| pv ptimesol p1ol pinvol pplusol (invOL x1) := (pinvol _ (inductionOpB pv ptimesol p1ol pinvol pplusol x1))
| pv ptimesol p1ol pinvol pplusol (plusOL x1 x2) := (pplusol _ _ (inductionOpB pv ptimesol p1ol pinvol pplusol x1) (inductionOpB pv ptimesol p1ol pinvol pplusol x2))
def inductionOp {n : ℕ} {A : Type} {P : ((OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm2 n A) → Type)} : ((∀ (fin : (fin n)) , (P (v2 fin))) → ((∀ (x1 : A) , (P (sing2 x1))) → ((∀ (x1 x2 : (OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm2 n A)) , ((P x1) → ((P x2) → (P (timesOL2 x1 x2))))) → ((P oneOL2) → ((∀ (x1 : (OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm2 n A)) , ((P x1) → (P (invOL2 x1)))) → ((∀ (x1 x2 : (OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm2 n A)) , ((P x1) → ((P x2) → (P (plusOL2 x1 x2))))) → (∀ (x : (OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm2 n A)) , (P x))))))))
| pv2 psing2 ptimesol2 p1ol2 pinvol2 pplusol2 (v2 x1) := (pv2 x1)
| pv2 psing2 ptimesol2 p1ol2 pinvol2 pplusol2 (sing2 x1) := (psing2 x1)
| pv2 psing2 ptimesol2 p1ol2 pinvol2 pplusol2 (timesOL2 x1 x2) := (ptimesol2 _ _ (inductionOp pv2 psing2 ptimesol2 p1ol2 pinvol2 pplusol2 x1) (inductionOp pv2 psing2 ptimesol2 p1ol2 pinvol2 pplusol2 x2))
| pv2 psing2 ptimesol2 p1ol2 pinvol2 pplusol2 oneOL2 := p1ol2
| pv2 psing2 ptimesol2 p1ol2 pinvol2 pplusol2 (invOL2 x1) := (pinvol2 _ (inductionOp pv2 psing2 ptimesol2 p1ol2 pinvol2 pplusol2 x1))
| pv2 psing2 ptimesol2 p1ol2 pinvol2 pplusol2 (plusOL2 x1 x2) := (pplusol2 _ _ (inductionOp pv2 psing2 ptimesol2 p1ol2 pinvol2 pplusol2 x1) (inductionOp pv2 psing2 ptimesol2 p1ol2 pinvol2 pplusol2 x2))
def stageB : (NonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm → (Staged NonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm))
| (timesL x1 x2) := (stage2 timesL (codeLift2 timesL) (stageB x1) (stageB x2))
| oneL := (Now oneL)
| (invL x1) := (stage1 invL (codeLift1 invL) (stageB x1))
| (plusL x1 x2) := (stage2 plusL (codeLift2 plusL) (stageB x1) (stageB x2))
def stageCl {A : Type} : ((ClNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm A) → (Staged (ClNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm A)))
| (sing x1) := (Now (sing x1))
| (timesCl x1 x2) := (stage2 timesCl (codeLift2 timesCl) (stageCl x1) (stageCl x2))
| oneCl := (Now oneCl)
| (invCl x1) := (stage1 invCl (codeLift1 invCl) (stageCl x1))
| (plusCl x1 x2) := (stage2 plusCl (codeLift2 plusCl) (stageCl x1) (stageCl x2))
def stageOpB {n : ℕ} : ((OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm n) → (Staged (OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm n)))
| (v x1) := (const (code (v x1)))
| (timesOL x1 x2) := (stage2 timesOL (codeLift2 timesOL) (stageOpB x1) (stageOpB x2))
| oneOL := (Now oneOL)
| (invOL x1) := (stage1 invOL (codeLift1 invOL) (stageOpB x1))
| (plusOL x1 x2) := (stage2 plusOL (codeLift2 plusOL) (stageOpB x1) (stageOpB x2))
def stageOp {n : ℕ} {A : Type} : ((OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm2 n A) → (Staged (OpNonassociativeNondistributiveRingTerm2 n A)))
| (sing2 x1) := (Now (sing2 x1))
| (v2 x1) := (const (code (v2 x1)))
| (timesOL2 x1 x2) := (stage2 timesOL2 (codeLift2 timesOL2) (stageOp x1) (stageOp x2))
| oneOL2 := (Now oneOL2)
| (invOL2 x1) := (stage1 invOL2 (codeLift1 invOL2) (stageOp x1))
| (plusOL2 x1 x2) := (stage2 plusOL2 (codeLift2 plusOL2) (stageOp x1) (stageOp x2))
structure StagedRepr (A : Type) (Repr : (Type → Type)) : Type :=
(timesT : ((Repr A) → ((Repr A) → (Repr A))))
(oneT : (Repr A))
(invT : ((Repr A) → (Repr A)))
(plusT : ((Repr A) → ((Repr A) → (Repr A))))
end NonassociativeNondistributiveRing |
4c1f3daa02765899f40643e4d48835643b888757 | bbecf0f1968d1fba4124103e4f6b55251d08e9c4 | /src/dynamics/ergodic/measure_preserving.lean | fd40d553097f79933a74ad0e1c28ecec94d2acb4 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | waynemunro/mathlib | e3fd4ff49f4cb43d4a8ded59d17be407bc5ee552 | 065a70810b5480d584033f7bbf8e0409480c2118 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,417,182,397 | 1,634,644,781,000 | 1,634,644,781,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,581 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import measure_theory.constructions.prod
/-!
# Measure preserving maps
We say that `f : α → β` is a measure preserving map w.r.t. measures `μ : measure α` and
`ν : measure β` if `f` is measurable and `map f μ = ν`. In this file we define the predicate
`measure_theory.measure_preserving` and prove its basic properties.
We use the term "measure preserving" because in many applications `α = β` and `μ = ν`.
## References
Partially based on
[this](https://www.isa-afp.org/browser_info/current/AFP/Ergodic_Theory/Measure_Preserving_Transformations.html)
Isabelle formalization.
## Tags
measure preserving map, measure
-/
variables {α β γ δ : Type*} [measurable_space α] [measurable_space β] [measurable_space γ]
[measurable_space δ]
namespace measure_theory
open measure function set
variables {μa : measure α} {μb : measure β} {μc : measure γ} {μd : measure δ}
/-- `f` is a measure preserving map w.r.t. measures `μa` and `μb` if `f` is measurable
and `map f μa = μb`. -/
@[protect_proj]
structure measure_preserving (f : α → β) (μa : measure α . volume_tac)
(μb : measure β . volume_tac) : Prop :=
(measurable : measurable f)
(map_eq : map f μa = μb)
namespace measure_preserving
protected lemma id (μ : measure α) : measure_preserving id μ μ :=
⟨measurable_id, map_id⟩
protected lemma quasi_measure_preserving {f : α → β} (hf : measure_preserving f μa μb) :
quasi_measure_preserving f μa μb :=
⟨hf.1, hf.2.absolutely_continuous⟩
lemma comp {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} (hg : measure_preserving g μb μc)
(hf : measure_preserving f μa μb) :
measure_preserving (g ∘ f) μa μc :=
⟨hg.1.comp hf.1, by rw [← map_map hg.1 hf.1, hf.2, hg.2]⟩
protected lemma sigma_finite {f : α → β} (hf : measure_preserving f μa μb) [sigma_finite μb] :
sigma_finite μa :=
sigma_finite.of_map μa hf.1 (by rwa hf.map_eq)
lemma measure_preimage {f : α → β} (hf : measure_preserving f μa μb)
{s : set β} (hs : measurable_set s) :
μa (f ⁻¹' s) = μb s :=
by rw [← hf.map_eq, map_apply hf.1 hs]
protected lemma iterate {f : α → α} (hf : measure_preserving f μa μa) :
∀ n, measure_preserving (f^[n]) μa μa
| 0 := measure_preserving.id μa
| (n + 1) := (iterate n).comp hf
lemma skew_product [sigma_finite μb] [sigma_finite μd]
{f : α → β} (hf : measure_preserving f μa μb) {g : α → γ → δ}
(hgm : measurable (uncurry g)) (hg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μa, map (g x) μc = μd) :
measure_preserving (λ p : α × γ, (f p.1, g p.1 p.2)) (μa.prod μc) (μb.prod μd) :=
begin
classical,
have : measurable (λ p : α × γ, (f p.1, g p.1 p.2)) := (hf.1.comp measurable_fst).prod_mk hgm,
/- if `μa = 0`, then the lemma is trivial, otherwise we can use `hg`
to deduce `sigma_finite μc`. -/
by_cases ha : μa = 0,
{ rw [← hf.map_eq, ha, zero_prod, (map f).map_zero, zero_prod],
exact ⟨this, (map _).map_zero⟩ },
haveI : μa.ae.ne_bot := ae_ne_bot.2 ha,
rcases hg.exists with ⟨x, hx⟩,
haveI : sigma_finite μc := sigma_finite.of_map _ hgm.of_uncurry_left (by rwa hx),
clear hx x,
refine ⟨this, (prod_eq $ λ s t hs ht, _).symm⟩,
rw [map_apply this (hs.prod ht)],
refine (prod_apply (this $ hs.prod ht)).trans _,
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂μa, μc ((λ y, (f x, g x y)) ⁻¹' s.prod t) = indicator (f ⁻¹' s) (λ y, μd t) x,
{ refine hg.mono (λ x hx, _),
simp only [mk_preimage_prod_right_fn_eq_if, indicator_apply, mem_preimage],
split_ifs,
{ rw [← map_apply hgm.of_uncurry_left ht, hx] },
{ exact measure_empty } },
simp only [preimage_preimage],
rw [lintegral_congr_ae this, lintegral_indicator _ (hf.1 hs),
set_lintegral_const, hf.measure_preimage hs, mul_comm]
end
/-- If `f : α → β` sends the measure `μa` to `μb` and `g : γ → δ` sends the measure `μc` to `μd`,
then `prod.map f g` sends `μa.prod μc` to `μb.prod μd`. -/
lemma prod [sigma_finite μb] [sigma_finite μd] {f : α → β} {g : γ → δ}
(hf : measure_preserving f μa μb) (hg : measure_preserving g μc μd) :
measure_preserving (prod.map f g) (μa.prod μc) (μb.prod μd) :=
have measurable (uncurry $ λ _ : α, g), from (hg.1.comp measurable_snd),
hf.skew_product this $ filter.eventually_of_forall $ λ _, hg.map_eq
variables {μ : measure α} {f : α → α} {s : set α}
/-- If `μ univ < n * μ s` and `f` is a map preserving measure `μ`,
then for some `x ∈ s` and `0 < m < n`, `f^[m] x ∈ s`. -/
lemma exists_mem_image_mem_of_volume_lt_mul_volume (hf : measure_preserving f μ μ)
(hs : measurable_set s) {n : ℕ} (hvol : μ (univ : set α) < n * μ s) :
∃ (x ∈ s) (m ∈ Ioo 0 n), f^[m] x ∈ s :=
begin
have A : ∀ m, measurable_set (f^[m] ⁻¹' s) := λ m, (hf.iterate m).measurable hs,
have B : ∀ m, μ (f^[m] ⁻¹' s) = μ s, from λ m, (hf.iterate m).measure_preimage hs,
have : μ (univ : set α) < (finset.range n).sum (λ m, μ (f^[m] ⁻¹' s)),
by simpa only [B, nsmul_eq_mul, finset.sum_const, finset.card_range],
rcases exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_sum_measure μ (λ m hm, A m) this
with ⟨i, hi, j, hj, hij, x, hxi, hxj⟩,
-- without `tactic.skip` Lean closes the extra goal but it takes a long time; not sure why
wlog hlt : i < j := hij.lt_or_lt using [i j, j i] tactic.skip,
{ simp only [set.mem_preimage, finset.mem_range] at hi hj hxi hxj,
refine ⟨f^[i] x, hxi, j - i, ⟨nat.sub_pos_of_lt hlt, lt_of_le_of_lt (j.sub_le i) hj⟩, _⟩,
rwa [← iterate_add_apply, nat.sub_add_cancel hlt.le] },
{ exact λ hi hj hij hxi hxj, this hj hi hij.symm hxj hxi }
end
/-- A self-map preserving a finite measure is conservative: if `μ s ≠ 0`, then at least one point
`x ∈ s` comes back to `s` under iterations of `f`. Actually, a.e. point of `s` comes back to `s`
infinitely many times, see `measure_theory.measure_preserving.conservative` and theorems about
`measure_theory.conservative`. -/
lemma exists_mem_image_mem [is_finite_measure μ] (hf : measure_preserving f μ μ)
(hs : measurable_set s) (hs' : μ s ≠ 0) :
∃ (x ∈ s) (m ≠ 0), f^[m] x ∈ s :=
begin
rcases ennreal.exists_nat_mul_gt hs' (measure_ne_top μ (univ : set α)) with ⟨N, hN⟩,
rcases hf.exists_mem_image_mem_of_volume_lt_mul_volume hs hN with ⟨x, hx, m, hm, hmx⟩,
exact ⟨x, hx, m, hm.1.ne', hmx⟩
end
end measure_preserving
end measure_theory
|
7d0c6179480736985a2a06e2fc4c672d7f506923 | 618003631150032a5676f229d13a079ac875ff77 | /src/tactic/simp_rw.lean | 34c058ff931ff5ede1f3899e12a9c1200eb865e4 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | awainverse/mathlib | 939b68c8486df66cfda64d327ad3d9165248c777 | ea76bd8f3ca0a8bf0a166a06a475b10663dec44a | refs/heads/master | 1,659,592,962,036 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 268,436,019 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,590,990,500,000 | 1,590,990,500,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,341 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
The `simp_rw` tactic, a mix of `simp` and `rewrite`.
-/
import tactic.core
/-!
# The `simp_rw` tactic
This module defines a tactic `simp_rw` which functions as a mix of `simp` and
`rw`. Like `rw`, it applies each rewrite rule in the given order, but like
`simp` it repeatedly applies these rules and also under binders like `∀ x, ...`,
`∃ x, ...` and `λ x, ...`.
## Implementation notes
The tactic works by taking each rewrite rule in turn and applying `simp only` to
it. Arguments to `simp_rw` are of the format used by `rw` and are translated to
their equivalents for `simp`.
-/
namespace tactic.interactive
open interactive interactive.types tactic
/--
`simp_rw` functions as a mix of `simp` and `rw`. Like `rw`, it applies each
rewrite rule in the given order, but like `simp` it repeatedly applies these
rules and also under binders like `∀ x, ...`, `∃ x, ...` and `λ x, ...`.
Usage:
- `simp_rw [lemma_1, ..., lemma_n]` will rewrite the goal by applying the
lemmas in that order. A lemma preceded by `←` is applied in the reverse direction.
- `simp_rw [lemma_1, ..., lemma_n] at h₁ ... hₙ` will rewrite the given hypotheses.
- `simp_rw [...] at ⊢ h₁ ... hₙ` rewrites the goal as well as the given hypotheses.
- `simp_rw [...] at *` rewrites in the whole context: all hypotheses and the goal.
Lemmas passed to `simp_rw` must be expressions that are valid arguments to `simp`.
For example, neither `simp` nor `rw` can solve the following, but `simp_rw` can:
```lean
example {α β : Type} {f : α → β} {t : set β} : (∀ s, f '' s ⊆ t) = ∀ s : set α, ∀ x ∈ s, x ∈ f ⁻¹' t :=
by simp_rw [set.image_subset_iff, set.subset_def]
```
-/
meta def simp_rw (q : parse rw_rules) (l : parse location) : tactic unit :=
q.rules.mmap' (λ rule, do
let simp_arg := if rule.symm
then simp_arg_type.symm_expr rule.rule
else simp_arg_type.expr rule.rule,
save_info rule.pos,
simp none tt [simp_arg] [] l) -- equivalent to `simp only [rule] at l`
add_tactic_doc
{ name := "simp_rw",
category := doc_category.tactic,
decl_names := [`tactic.interactive.simp_rw],
tags := ["simplification"] }
end tactic.interactive
|
1aefa86c7f8fd9c9340a1133774a4ab90e12c831 | 4d2583807a5ac6caaffd3d7a5f646d61ca85d532 | /src/category_theory/limits/lattice.lean | b40b444fc6e2630614332af0daff34497a75b518 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | AntoineChambert-Loir/mathlib | 64aabb896129885f12296a799818061bc90da1ff | 07be904260ab6e36a5769680b6012f03a4727134 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,187,631,771 | 1,636,719,886,000 | 1,636,719,886,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,308 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Justus Springer
-/
import category_theory.category.preorder
import category_theory.limits.shapes.finite_limits
import order.complete_lattice
/-!
# Limits in lattice categories are given by infimums and supremums.
-/
universes u
open category_theory
open category_theory.limits
namespace category_theory.limits.complete_lattice
section semilattice
variables {α : Type u}
variables {J : Type u} [small_category J] [fin_category J]
/--
The limit cone over any functor from a finite diagram into a `semilattice_inf_top`.
-/
def finite_limit_cone [semilattice_inf_top α] (F : J ⥤ α) : limit_cone F :=
{ cone :=
{ X := finset.univ.inf F.obj,
π := { app := λ j, hom_of_le (finset.inf_le (fintype.complete _)) } },
is_limit := { lift := λ s, hom_of_le (finset.le_inf (λ j _, (s.π.app j).down.down)) } }
/--
The colimit cocone over any functor from a finite diagram into a `semilattice_sup_bot`.
-/
def finite_colimit_cocone [semilattice_sup_bot α] (F : J ⥤ α) : colimit_cocone F :=
{ cocone :=
{ X := finset.univ.sup F.obj,
ι := { app := λ i, hom_of_le (finset.le_sup (fintype.complete _)) } },
is_colimit := { desc := λ s, hom_of_le (finset.sup_le (λ j _, (s.ι.app j).down.down)) } }
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance has_finite_limits_of_semilattice_inf_top [semilattice_inf_top α] :
has_finite_limits α :=
⟨λ J 𝒥₁ 𝒥₂, by exactI { has_limit := λ F, has_limit.mk (finite_limit_cone F) }⟩
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance has_finite_colimits_of_semilattice_sup_bot [semilattice_sup_bot α] :
has_finite_colimits α :=
⟨λ J 𝒥₁ 𝒥₂, by exactI { has_colimit := λ F, has_colimit.mk (finite_colimit_cocone F) }⟩
/--
The limit of a functor from a finite diagram into a `semilattice_inf_top` is the infimum of the
objects in the image.
-/
lemma finite_limit_eq_finset_univ_inf [semilattice_inf_top α] (F : J ⥤ α) :
limit F = finset.univ.inf F.obj :=
(is_limit.cone_point_unique_up_to_iso (limit.is_limit F)
(finite_limit_cone F).is_limit).to_eq
/--
The colimit of a functor from a finite diagram into a `semilattice_sup_bot` is the supremum of the
objects in the image.
-/
lemma finite_colimit_eq_finset_univ_sup [semilattice_sup_bot α] (F : J ⥤ α) :
colimit F = finset.univ.sup F.obj :=
(is_colimit.cocone_point_unique_up_to_iso (colimit.is_colimit F)
(finite_colimit_cocone F).is_colimit).to_eq
/--
A finite product in the category of a `semilattice_inf_top` is the same as the infimum.
-/
lemma finite_product_eq_finset_inf [semilattice_inf_top α] {ι : Type u} [decidable_eq ι]
[fintype ι] (f : ι → α) : (∏ f) = (fintype.elems ι).inf f :=
(is_limit.cone_point_unique_up_to_iso (limit.is_limit _)
(finite_limit_cone (discrete.functor f)).is_limit).to_eq
/--
A finite coproduct in the category of a `semilattice_sup_bot` is the same as the supremum.
-/
lemma finite_coproduct_eq_finset_sup [semilattice_sup_bot α] {ι : Type u} [decidable_eq ι]
[fintype ι] (f : ι → α) : (∐ f) = (fintype.elems ι).sup f :=
(is_colimit.cocone_point_unique_up_to_iso (colimit.is_colimit _)
(finite_colimit_cocone (discrete.functor f)).is_colimit).to_eq
/--
The binary product in the category of a `semilattice_inf_top` is the same as the infimum.
-/
@[simp]
lemma prod_eq_inf [semilattice_inf_top α] (x y : α) : limits.prod x y = x ⊓ y :=
calc limits.prod x y = limit (pair x y) : rfl
... = finset.univ.inf (pair x y).obj : by rw finite_limit_eq_finset_univ_inf (pair x y)
... = x ⊓ (y ⊓ ⊤) : rfl -- Note: finset.inf is realized as a fold, hence the definitional equality
... = x ⊓ y : by rw inf_top_eq
/--
The binary coproduct in the category of a `semilattice_sup_bot` is the same as the supremum.
-/
@[simp]
lemma coprod_eq_sup [semilattice_sup_bot α] (x y : α) : limits.coprod x y = x ⊔ y :=
calc limits.coprod x y = colimit (pair x y) : rfl
... = finset.univ.sup (pair x y).obj : by rw finite_colimit_eq_finset_univ_sup (pair x y)
... = x ⊔ (y ⊔ ⊥) : rfl -- Note: finset.sup is realized as a fold, hence the definitional equality
... = x ⊔ y : by rw sup_bot_eq
/--
The pullback in the category of a `semilattice_inf_top` is the same as the infimum over the objects.
-/
@[simp]
lemma pullback_eq_inf [semilattice_inf_top α] {x y z : α} (f : x ⟶ z) (g : y ⟶ z) :
pullback f g = x ⊓ y :=
calc pullback f g = limit (cospan f g) : rfl
... = finset.univ.inf (cospan f g).obj : by rw finite_limit_eq_finset_univ_inf
... = z ⊓ (x ⊓ (y ⊓ ⊤)) : rfl
... = z ⊓ (x ⊓ y) : by rw inf_top_eq
... = x ⊓ y : inf_eq_right.mpr (inf_le_of_left_le f.le)
/--
The pushout in the category of a `semilattice_sup_bot` is the same as the supremum over the objects.
-/
@[simp]
lemma pushout_eq_sup [semilattice_sup_bot α] (x y z : α) (f : z ⟶ x) (g : z ⟶ y) :
pushout f g = x ⊔ y :=
calc pushout f g = colimit (span f g) : rfl
... = finset.univ.sup (span f g).obj : by rw finite_colimit_eq_finset_univ_sup
... = z ⊔ (x ⊔ (y ⊔ ⊥)) : rfl
... = z ⊔ (x ⊔ y) : by rw sup_bot_eq
... = x ⊔ y : sup_eq_right.mpr (le_sup_of_le_left f.le)
end semilattice
variables {α : Type u} [complete_lattice α]
variables {J : Type u} [small_category J]
/--
The limit cone over any functor into a complete lattice.
-/
def limit_cone (F : J ⥤ α) : limit_cone F :=
{ cone :=
{ X := infi F.obj,
π :=
{ app := λ j, hom_of_le (complete_lattice.Inf_le _ _ (set.mem_range_self _)) } },
is_limit :=
{ lift := λ s, hom_of_le (complete_lattice.le_Inf _ _
begin rintros _ ⟨j, rfl⟩, exact (s.π.app j).le, end) } }
/--
The colimit cocone over any functor into a complete lattice.
-/
def colimit_cocone (F : J ⥤ α) : colimit_cocone F :=
{ cocone :=
{ X := supr F.obj,
ι :=
{ app := λ j, hom_of_le (complete_lattice.le_Sup _ _ (set.mem_range_self _)) } },
is_colimit :=
{ desc := λ s, hom_of_le (complete_lattice.Sup_le _ _
begin rintros _ ⟨j, rfl⟩, exact (s.ι.app j).le, end) } }
-- It would be nice to only use the `Inf` half of the complete lattice, but
-- this seems not to have been described separately.
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance has_limits_of_complete_lattice : has_limits α :=
{ has_limits_of_shape := λ J 𝒥, by exactI
{ has_limit := λ F, has_limit.mk (limit_cone F) } }
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance has_colimits_of_complete_lattice : has_colimits α :=
{ has_colimits_of_shape := λ J 𝒥, by exactI
{ has_colimit := λ F, has_colimit.mk (colimit_cocone F) } }
/--
The limit of a functor into a complete lattice is the infimum of the objects in the image.
-/
lemma limit_eq_infi (F : J ⥤ α) : limit F = infi F.obj :=
(is_limit.cone_point_unique_up_to_iso (limit.is_limit F)
(limit_cone F).is_limit).to_eq
/--
The colimit of a functor into a complete lattice is the supremum of the objects in the image.
-/
lemma colimit_eq_supr (F : J ⥤ α) : colimit F = supr F.obj :=
(is_colimit.cocone_point_unique_up_to_iso (colimit.is_colimit F)
(colimit_cocone F).is_colimit).to_eq
end category_theory.limits.complete_lattice
|
8faec8f560e4e99707cfc558bc33362472b0dace | 94e33a31faa76775069b071adea97e86e218a8ee | /src/data/matrix/notation.lean | 2915fd7f8d4482f1573a8a023799eba99379c062 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | urkud/mathlib | eab80095e1b9f1513bfb7f25b4fa82fa4fd02989 | 6379d39e6b5b279df9715f8011369a301b634e41 | refs/heads/master | 1,658,425,342,662 | 1,658,078,703,000 | 1,658,078,703,000 | 186,910,338 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,512,083,000 | 1,557,958,709,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,453 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Eric Wieser
-/
import data.matrix.basic
import data.fin.vec_notation
import tactic.fin_cases
import algebra.big_operators.fin
/-!
# Matrix and vector notation
This file includes `simp` lemmas for applying operations in `data.matrix.basic` to values built out
of the matrix notation `![a, b] = vec_cons a (vec_cons b vec_empty)` defined in
`data.fin.vec_notation`.
This also provides the new notation `!![a, b; c, d] = ![![a, b], ![c, d]]`.
This notation also works for empty matrices; `!![,,,] : matrix (fin 0) (fin 3)` and
`!![;;;] : matrix (fin 3) (fin 0)`.
## Implementation notes
The `simp` lemmas require that one of the arguments is of the form `vec_cons _ _`.
This ensures `simp` works with entries only when (some) entries are already given.
In other words, this notation will only appear in the output of `simp` if it
already appears in the input.
## Notations
This file provide notation `!![a, b; c, d]` for matrices, which corresponds to
`matrix.of ![![a, b], ![c, d]]`.
A parser for `a, b; c, d`-style strings is provided as `matrix.entry_parser`, while
`matrix.notation` provides the hook for the `!!` notation.
Note that in lean 3 the pretty-printer will not show `!!` notation, instead showing the version
with `of ![![...]]`.
## Examples
Examples of usage can be found in the `test/matrix.lean` file.
-/
namespace matrix
universe u
variables {α : Type u} {o n m : ℕ} {m' n' o' : Type*}
open_locale matrix
/-- Matrices can be reflected whenever their entries can. We insert an `@id (matrix m' n' α)` to
prevent immediate decay to a function. -/
meta instance matrix.reflect [reflected_univ.{u}] [reflected_univ.{u_1}] [reflected_univ.{u_2}]
[reflected _ α] [reflected _ m'] [reflected _ n']
[h : has_reflect (m' → n' → α)] : has_reflect (matrix m' n' α) :=
λ m, (by reflect_name : reflected _ @id.{(max u_1 u_2 u) + 1}).subst₂
((by reflect_name : reflected _ @matrix.{u_1 u_2 u}).subst₃ `(_) `(_) `(_)) $
by { dunfold matrix, exact h m }
section parser
open lean
open lean.parser
open interactive
open interactive.types
/-- Parse the entries of a matrix -/
meta def entry_parser {α : Type} (p : parser α) :
parser (Σ m n, fin m → fin n → α) :=
do
-- a list of lists if the matrix has at least one row, or the number of columns if the matrix has
-- zero rows.
let p : parser (list (list α) ⊕ ℕ) :=
(sum.inl <$> (
(pure [] <* tk ";").repeat_at_least 1 <|> -- empty rows
(sep_by_trailing (tk ";") $ sep_by_trailing (tk ",") p)) <|>
(sum.inr <$> list.length <$> many (tk ","))), -- empty columns
which ← p,
match which with
| (sum.inl l) := do
h :: tl ← pure l,
let n := h.length,
l : list (vector α n) ← l.mmap (λ row,
if h : row.length = n then
pure (⟨row, h⟩ : vector α n)
else
interaction_monad.fail "Rows must be of equal length"),
pure ⟨l.length, n, λ i j, (l.nth_le _ i.prop).nth j⟩
| (sum.inr n) :=
pure ⟨0, n, fin_zero_elim⟩
end
-- Lean can't find this instance without some help. We only need it available in `Type 0`, and it is
-- a massive amount of effort to make it universe-polymorphic.
@[instance] meta def sigma_sigma_fin_matrix_has_reflect {α : Type}
[has_reflect α] [reflected _ α] :
has_reflect (Σ (m n : ℕ), fin m → fin n → α) :=
@sigma.reflect.{0 0} _ _ ℕ (λ m, Σ n, fin m → fin n → α) _ _ _ $ λ i,
@sigma.reflect.{0 0} _ _ ℕ _ _ _ _ (λ j, infer_instance)
/-- `!![a, b; c, d]` notation for matrices indexed by `fin m` and `fin n`. See the module docstring
for details. -/
@[user_notation]
meta def «notation» (_ : parse $ tk "!![")
(val : parse (entry_parser (parser.pexpr 1) <* tk "]")) : parser pexpr :=
do
let ⟨m, n, entries⟩ := val,
let entry_vals := pi_fin.to_pexpr (pi_fin.to_pexpr ∘ entries),
pure (``(@matrix.of (fin %%`(m)) (fin %%`(n)) _).app entry_vals)
end parser
variables (a b : ℕ)
/-- Use `![...]` notation for displaying a `fin`-indexed matrix, for example:
```
#eval !![1, 2; 3, 4] + !![3, 4; 5, 6] -- !![4, 6; 8, 10]
```
-/
instance [has_repr α] : has_repr (matrix (fin m) (fin n) α) :=
{ repr := λ f,
"!![" ++ (string.intercalate "; " $ (list.fin_range m).map $ λ i,
string.intercalate ", " $ (list.fin_range n).map (λ j, repr (f i j))) ++ "]" }
@[simp] lemma cons_val' (v : n' → α) (B : fin m → n' → α) (i j) :
vec_cons v B i j = vec_cons (v j) (λ i, B i j) i :=
by { refine fin.cases _ _ i; simp }
@[simp] lemma head_val' (B : fin m.succ → n' → α) (j : n') :
vec_head (λ i, B i j) = vec_head B j := rfl
@[simp] lemma tail_val' (B : fin m.succ → n' → α) (j : n') :
vec_tail (λ i, B i j) = λ i, vec_tail B i j :=
by { ext, simp [vec_tail] }
section dot_product
variables [add_comm_monoid α] [has_mul α]
@[simp] lemma dot_product_empty (v w : fin 0 → α) :
dot_product v w = 0 := finset.sum_empty
@[simp] lemma cons_dot_product (x : α) (v : fin n → α) (w : fin n.succ → α) :
dot_product (vec_cons x v) w = x * vec_head w + dot_product v (vec_tail w) :=
by simp [dot_product, fin.sum_univ_succ, vec_head, vec_tail]
@[simp] lemma dot_product_cons (v : fin n.succ → α) (x : α) (w : fin n → α) :
dot_product v (vec_cons x w) = vec_head v * x + dot_product (vec_tail v) w :=
by simp [dot_product, fin.sum_univ_succ, vec_head, vec_tail]
@[simp] lemma cons_dot_product_cons (x : α) (v : fin n → α) (y : α) (w : fin n → α) :
dot_product (vec_cons x v) (vec_cons y w) = x * y + dot_product v w :=
by simp
end dot_product
section col_row
@[simp] lemma col_empty (v : fin 0 → α) : col v = vec_empty :=
empty_eq _
@[simp] lemma col_cons (x : α) (u : fin m → α) :
col (vec_cons x u) = vec_cons (λ _, x) (col u) :=
by { ext i j, refine fin.cases _ _ i; simp [vec_head, vec_tail] }
@[simp] lemma row_empty : row (vec_empty : fin 0 → α) = λ _, vec_empty :=
by { ext, refl }
@[simp] lemma row_cons (x : α) (u : fin m → α) :
row (vec_cons x u) = λ _, vec_cons x u :=
by { ext, refl }
end col_row
section transpose
@[simp] lemma transpose_empty_rows (A : matrix m' (fin 0) α) : Aᵀ = of ![] := empty_eq _
@[simp] lemma transpose_empty_cols (A : matrix (fin 0) m' α) : Aᵀ = of (λ i, ![]) :=
funext (λ i, empty_eq _)
@[simp] lemma cons_transpose (v : n' → α) (A : matrix (fin m) n' α) :
(of (vec_cons v A))ᵀ = of (λ i, vec_cons (v i) (Aᵀ i)) :=
by { ext i j, refine fin.cases _ _ j; simp }
@[simp] lemma head_transpose (A : matrix m' (fin n.succ) α) :
vec_head (of.symm Aᵀ) = vec_head ∘ (of.symm A) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma tail_transpose (A : matrix m' (fin n.succ) α) :
vec_tail (of.symm Aᵀ) = (vec_tail ∘ A)ᵀ :=
by { ext i j, refl }
end transpose
section mul
variables [semiring α]
@[simp] lemma empty_mul [fintype n'] (A : matrix (fin 0) n' α) (B : matrix n' o' α) :
A ⬝ B = of ![] :=
empty_eq _
@[simp] lemma empty_mul_empty (A : matrix m' (fin 0) α) (B : matrix (fin 0) o' α) :
A ⬝ B = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma mul_empty [fintype n'] (A : matrix m' n' α) (B : matrix n' (fin 0) α) :
A ⬝ B = of (λ _, ![]) :=
funext (λ _, empty_eq _)
lemma mul_val_succ [fintype n']
(A : matrix (fin m.succ) n' α) (B : matrix n' o' α) (i : fin m) (j : o') :
(A ⬝ B) i.succ j = (of (vec_tail (of.symm A)) ⬝ B) i j := rfl
@[simp] lemma cons_mul [fintype n'] (v : n' → α) (A : fin m → n' → α) (B : matrix n' o' α) :
of (vec_cons v A) ⬝ B = of (vec_cons (vec_mul v B) (of.symm (of A ⬝ B))) :=
by { ext i j, refine fin.cases _ _ i, { refl }, simp [mul_val_succ], }
end mul
section vec_mul
variables [semiring α]
@[simp] lemma empty_vec_mul (v : fin 0 → α) (B : matrix (fin 0) o' α) :
vec_mul v B = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma vec_mul_empty [fintype n'] (v : n' → α) (B : matrix n' (fin 0) α) :
vec_mul v B = ![] :=
empty_eq _
@[simp] lemma cons_vec_mul (x : α) (v : fin n → α) (B : fin n.succ → o' → α) :
vec_mul (vec_cons x v) (of B) = x • (vec_head B) + vec_mul v (of $ vec_tail B) :=
by { ext i, simp [vec_mul] }
@[simp] lemma vec_mul_cons (v : fin n.succ → α) (w : o' → α) (B : fin n → o' → α) :
vec_mul v (of $ vec_cons w B) = vec_head v • w + vec_mul (vec_tail v) (of B) :=
by { ext i, simp [vec_mul] }
end vec_mul
section mul_vec
variables [semiring α]
@[simp] lemma empty_mul_vec [fintype n'] (A : matrix (fin 0) n' α) (v : n' → α) :
mul_vec A v = ![] :=
empty_eq _
@[simp] lemma mul_vec_empty (A : matrix m' (fin 0) α) (v : fin 0 → α) :
mul_vec A v = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma cons_mul_vec [fintype n'] (v : n' → α) (A : fin m → n' → α) (w : n' → α) :
mul_vec (of $ vec_cons v A) w = vec_cons (dot_product v w) (mul_vec (of A) w) :=
by { ext i, refine fin.cases _ _ i; simp [mul_vec] }
@[simp] lemma mul_vec_cons {α} [comm_semiring α] (A : m' → (fin n.succ) → α) (x : α)
(v : fin n → α) :
mul_vec (of A) (vec_cons x v) = (x • vec_head ∘ A) + mul_vec (of (vec_tail ∘ A)) v :=
by { ext i, simp [mul_vec, mul_comm] }
end mul_vec
section vec_mul_vec
variables [semiring α]
@[simp] lemma empty_vec_mul_vec (v : fin 0 → α) (w : n' → α) :
vec_mul_vec v w = ![] :=
empty_eq _
@[simp] lemma vec_mul_vec_empty (v : m' → α) (w : fin 0 → α) :
vec_mul_vec v w = λ _, ![] :=
funext (λ i, empty_eq _)
@[simp] lemma cons_vec_mul_vec (x : α) (v : fin m → α) (w : n' → α) :
vec_mul_vec (vec_cons x v) w = vec_cons (x • w) (vec_mul_vec v w) :=
by { ext i, refine fin.cases _ _ i; simp [vec_mul_vec] }
@[simp] lemma vec_mul_vec_cons (v : m' → α) (x : α) (w : fin n → α) :
vec_mul_vec v (vec_cons x w) = λ i, v i • vec_cons x w :=
by { ext i j, rw [vec_mul_vec, pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul] }
end vec_mul_vec
section smul
variables [semiring α]
@[simp] lemma smul_mat_empty {m' : Type*} (x : α) (A : fin 0 → m' → α) : x • A = ![] := empty_eq _
@[simp] lemma smul_mat_cons (x : α) (v : n' → α) (A : fin m → n' → α) :
x • vec_cons v A = vec_cons (x • v) (x • A) :=
by { ext i, refine fin.cases _ _ i; simp }
end smul
section minor
@[simp] lemma minor_empty (A : matrix m' n' α) (row : fin 0 → m') (col : o' → n') :
minor A row col = ![] :=
empty_eq _
@[simp] lemma minor_cons_row (A : matrix m' n' α) (i : m') (row : fin m → m') (col : o' → n') :
minor A (vec_cons i row) col = vec_cons (λ j, A i (col j)) (minor A row col) :=
by { ext i j, refine fin.cases _ _ i; simp [minor] }
end minor
section vec2_and_vec3
section one
variables [has_zero α] [has_one α]
lemma one_fin_two : (1 : matrix (fin 2) (fin 2) α) = !![1, 0; 0, 1] :=
by { ext i j, fin_cases i; fin_cases j; refl }
lemma one_fin_three : (1 : matrix (fin 3) (fin 3) α) = !![1, 0, 0; 0, 1, 0; 0, 0, 1] :=
by { ext i j, fin_cases i; fin_cases j; refl }
end one
lemma mul_fin_two [add_comm_monoid α] [has_mul α] (a₁₁ a₁₂ a₂₁ a₂₂ b₁₁ b₁₂ b₂₁ b₂₂ : α) :
!![a₁₁, a₁₂;
a₂₁, a₂₂] ⬝ !![b₁₁, b₁₂;
b₂₁, b₂₂] = !![a₁₁ * b₁₁ + a₁₂ * b₂₁, a₁₁ * b₁₂ + a₁₂ * b₂₂;
a₂₁ * b₁₁ + a₂₂ * b₂₁, a₂₁ * b₁₂ + a₂₂ * b₂₂] :=
begin
ext i j,
fin_cases i; fin_cases j; simp [matrix.mul, dot_product, fin.sum_univ_succ]
end
lemma mul_fin_three [add_comm_monoid α] [has_mul α]
(a₁₁ a₁₂ a₁₃ a₂₁ a₂₂ a₂₃ a₃₁ a₃₂ a₃₃ b₁₁ b₁₂ b₁₃ b₂₁ b₂₂ b₂₃ b₃₁ b₃₂ b₃₃ : α) :
!![a₁₁, a₁₂, a₁₃;
a₂₁, a₂₂, a₂₃;
a₃₁, a₃₂, a₃₃] ⬝ !![b₁₁, b₁₂, b₁₃;
b₂₁, b₂₂, b₂₃;
b₃₁, b₃₂, b₃₃] =
!![a₁₁*b₁₁ + a₁₂*b₂₁ + a₁₃*b₃₁, a₁₁*b₁₂ + a₁₂*b₂₂ + a₁₃*b₃₂, a₁₁*b₁₃ + a₁₂*b₂₃ + a₁₃*b₃₃;
a₂₁*b₁₁ + a₂₂*b₂₁ + a₂₃*b₃₁, a₂₁*b₁₂ + a₂₂*b₂₂ + a₂₃*b₃₂, a₂₁*b₁₃ + a₂₂*b₂₃ + a₂₃*b₃₃;
a₃₁*b₁₁ + a₃₂*b₂₁ + a₃₃*b₃₁, a₃₁*b₁₂ + a₃₂*b₂₂ + a₃₃*b₃₂, a₃₁*b₁₃ + a₃₂*b₂₃ + a₃₃*b₃₃] :=
begin
ext i j,
fin_cases i; fin_cases j; simp [matrix.mul, dot_product, fin.sum_univ_succ, ←add_assoc],
end
lemma vec2_eq {a₀ a₁ b₀ b₁ : α} (h₀ : a₀ = b₀) (h₁ : a₁ = b₁) :
![a₀, a₁] = ![b₀, b₁] :=
by subst_vars
lemma vec3_eq {a₀ a₁ a₂ b₀ b₁ b₂ : α} (h₀ : a₀ = b₀) (h₁ : a₁ = b₁) (h₂ : a₂ = b₂) :
![a₀, a₁, a₂] = ![b₀, b₁, b₂] :=
by subst_vars
lemma vec2_add [has_add α] (a₀ a₁ b₀ b₁ : α) :
![a₀, a₁] + ![b₀, b₁] = ![a₀ + b₀, a₁ + b₁] :=
by rw [cons_add_cons, cons_add_cons, empty_add_empty]
lemma vec3_add [has_add α] (a₀ a₁ a₂ b₀ b₁ b₂ : α) :
![a₀, a₁, a₂] + ![b₀, b₁, b₂] = ![a₀ + b₀, a₁ + b₁, a₂ + b₂] :=
by rw [cons_add_cons, cons_add_cons, cons_add_cons, empty_add_empty]
lemma smul_vec2 {R : Type*} [has_smul R α] (x : R) (a₀ a₁ : α) :
x • ![a₀, a₁] = ![x • a₀, x • a₁] :=
by rw [smul_cons, smul_cons, smul_empty]
lemma smul_vec3 {R : Type*} [has_smul R α] (x : R) (a₀ a₁ a₂ : α) :
x • ![a₀, a₁, a₂] = ![x • a₀, x • a₁, x • a₂] :=
by rw [smul_cons, smul_cons, smul_cons, smul_empty]
variables [add_comm_monoid α] [has_mul α]
lemma vec2_dot_product' {a₀ a₁ b₀ b₁ : α} :
![a₀, a₁] ⬝ᵥ ![b₀, b₁] = a₀ * b₀ + a₁ * b₁ :=
by rw [cons_dot_product_cons, cons_dot_product_cons, dot_product_empty, add_zero]
@[simp] lemma vec2_dot_product (v w : fin 2 → α) :
v ⬝ᵥ w = v 0 * w 0 + v 1 * w 1 :=
vec2_dot_product'
lemma vec3_dot_product' {a₀ a₁ a₂ b₀ b₁ b₂ : α} :
![a₀, a₁, a₂] ⬝ᵥ ![b₀, b₁, b₂] = a₀ * b₀ + a₁ * b₁ + a₂ * b₂ :=
by rw [cons_dot_product_cons, cons_dot_product_cons, cons_dot_product_cons,
dot_product_empty, add_zero, add_assoc]
@[simp] lemma vec3_dot_product (v w : fin 3 → α) :
v ⬝ᵥ w = v 0 * w 0 + v 1 * w 1 + v 2 * w 2 :=
vec3_dot_product'
end vec2_and_vec3
end matrix
|
3f14aa5428f0dce1788e06530e538129e8d932a2 | 57aec6ee746bc7e3a3dd5e767e53bd95beb82f6d | /tests/lean/run/univIssue.lean | 0b00401e85a4832fe7fc5d5107602ae312cd4f53 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | collares/lean4 | 861a9269c4592bce49b71059e232ff0bfe4594cc | 52a4f535d853a2c7c7eea5fee8a4fa04c682c1ee | refs/heads/master | 1,691,419,031,324 | 1,618,678,138,000 | 1,618,678,138,000 | 358,989,750 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,618,696,333,000 | 1,618,696,333,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 308 | lean | universes u v
@[inline] def ex1 {σ : Type u} {m : Type u → Type v} [Functor m] {α : Type u} (x : StateT σ m α) (s : σ) : m α :=
Functor.map Prod.fst (x s)
@[inline] def ex2 {σ : Type u} {m : Type u → Type v} [Functor m] {α : Type u} (x : StateT σ m α) (s : σ) : m α :=
Prod.fst <$> x s
|
0b303fe00a398cf5eba671326e1c4b5125aa3605 | dfbb669f3f58ceb57cb207dcfab5726a07425b03 | /vscode-lean4/test/test-fixtures/simple/Main.lean | 5e66ab0fffd0eb0b23eb2d515fd585359f8cffe3 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover/vscode-lean4 | 8bcf7f06867b3c1d42007fe6da863a7a17444dbb | 6ef0bfa668bdeaad0979e6df10551d42fcc01094 | refs/heads/master | 1,692,247,771,767 | 1,691,608,804,000 | 1,691,608,804,000 | 325,845,305 | 64 | 24 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,176,429,000 | 1,609,435,614,000 | TypeScript | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 113 | lean | import Test.Version
def main : IO Unit :=
IO.println s!"Hello: {getLeanVersion}"
#eval main
#eval IO.appPath |
46eee1d8db6ddc6b19719272c3823e9701c003be | 87a08a8e9b222ec02f3327dca4ae24590c1b3de9 | /src/topology/uniform_space/basic.lean | 3689b3ad799e53c09c41fe676ae8428ce5c01c42 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | naussicaa/mathlib | 86d05223517a39e80920549a8052f9cf0e0b77b8 | 1ef2c2df20cf45c21675d855436228c7ae02d47a | refs/heads/master | 1,592,104,950,080 | 1,562,073,069,000 | 1,562,073,069,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 42,148 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
Theory of uniform spaces.
Uniform spaces are a generalization of metric spaces and topological groups. Many concepts directly
generalize to uniform spaces, e.g.
* completeness
* extension of uniform continuous functions to complete spaces
* uniform contiunuity & embedding
* totally bounded
* totally bounded ∧ complete → compact
The central concept of uniform spaces is its uniformity: a filter relating two elements of the
space. This filter is reflexive, symmetric and transitive. So a set (i.e. a relation) in this filter
represents a 'distance': it is reflexive, symmetric and the uniformity contains a set for which the
`triangular` rule holds.
The formalization is mostly based on the books:
N. Bourbaki: General Topology
I. M. James: Topologies and Uniformities
A major difference is that this formalization is heavily based on the filter library.
-/
import order.filter.basic order.filter.lift topology.constructions
open set lattice filter classical
local attribute [instance, priority 0] prop_decidable
set_option eqn_compiler.zeta true
universes u
section
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
/-- The identity relation, or the graph of the identity function -/
def id_rel {α : Type*} := {p : α × α | p.1 = p.2}
@[simp] theorem mem_id_rel {a b : α} : (a, b) ∈ @id_rel α ↔ a = b := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem id_rel_subset {s : set (α × α)} : id_rel ⊆ s ↔ ∀ a, (a, a) ∈ s :=
by simp [subset_def]; exact forall_congr (λ a, by simp)
/-- The composition of relations -/
def comp_rel {α : Type u} (r₁ r₂ : set (α×α)) := {p : α × α | ∃z:α, (p.1, z) ∈ r₁ ∧ (z, p.2) ∈ r₂}
@[simp] theorem mem_comp_rel {r₁ r₂ : set (α×α)}
{x y : α} : (x, y) ∈ comp_rel r₁ r₂ ↔ ∃ z, (x, z) ∈ r₁ ∧ (z, y) ∈ r₂ := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem swap_id_rel : prod.swap '' id_rel = @id_rel α :=
set.ext $ assume ⟨a, b⟩, by simp [image_swap_eq_preimage_swap]; exact eq_comm
theorem monotone_comp_rel [preorder β] {f g : β → set (α×α)}
(hf : monotone f) (hg : monotone g) : monotone (λx, comp_rel (f x) (g x)) :=
assume a b h p ⟨z, h₁, h₂⟩, ⟨z, hf h h₁, hg h h₂⟩
lemma prod_mk_mem_comp_rel {a b c : α} {s t : set (α×α)} (h₁ : (a, c) ∈ s) (h₂ : (c, b) ∈ t) :
(a, b) ∈ comp_rel s t :=
⟨c, h₁, h₂⟩
@[simp] lemma id_comp_rel {r : set (α×α)} : comp_rel id_rel r = r :=
set.ext $ assume ⟨a, b⟩, by simp
lemma comp_rel_assoc {r s t : set (α×α)} :
comp_rel (comp_rel r s) t = comp_rel r (comp_rel s t) :=
by ext p; cases p; simp only [mem_comp_rel]; tauto
/-- This core description of a uniform space is outside of the type class hierarchy. It is useful
for constructions of uniform spaces, when the topology is derived from the uniform space. -/
structure uniform_space.core (α : Type u) :=
(uniformity : filter (α × α))
(refl : principal id_rel ≤ uniformity)
(symm : tendsto prod.swap uniformity uniformity)
(comp : uniformity.lift' (λs, comp_rel s s) ≤ uniformity)
def uniform_space.core.mk' {α : Type u} (U : filter (α × α))
(refl : ∀ (r ∈ U) x, (x, x) ∈ r)
(symm : ∀ r ∈ U, {p | prod.swap p ∈ r} ∈ U)
(comp : ∀ r ∈ U, ∃ t ∈ U, comp_rel t t ⊆ r) : uniform_space.core α :=
⟨U, λ r ru, id_rel_subset.2 (refl _ ru), symm,
begin
intros r ru,
rw [mem_lift'_sets],
exact comp _ ru,
apply monotone_comp_rel; exact monotone_id,
end⟩
/-- A uniform space generates a topological space -/
def uniform_space.core.to_topological_space {α : Type u} (u : uniform_space.core α) :
topological_space α :=
{ is_open := λs, ∀x∈s, { p : α × α | p.1 = x → p.2 ∈ s } ∈ u.uniformity,
is_open_univ := by simp; intro; exact univ_mem_sets,
is_open_inter :=
assume s t hs ht x ⟨xs, xt⟩, by filter_upwards [hs x xs, ht x xt]; simp {contextual := tt},
is_open_sUnion :=
assume s hs x ⟨t, ts, xt⟩, by filter_upwards [hs t ts x xt] assume p ph h, ⟨t, ts, ph h⟩ }
lemma uniform_space.core_eq : ∀{u₁ u₂ : uniform_space.core α}, u₁.uniformity = u₂.uniformity → u₁ = u₂
| ⟨u₁, _, _, _⟩ ⟨u₂, _, _, _⟩ h := have u₁ = u₂, from h, by simp [*]
/-- A uniform space is a generalization of the "uniform" topological aspects of a
metric space. It consists of a filter on `α × α` called the "uniformity", which
satisfies properties analogous to the reflexivity, symmetry, and triangle properties
of a metric.
A metric space has a natural uniformity, and a uniform space has a natural topology.
A topological group also has a natural uniformity, even when it is not metrizable. -/
class uniform_space (α : Type u) extends topological_space α, uniform_space.core α :=
(is_open_uniformity : ∀s, is_open s ↔ (∀x∈s, { p : α × α | p.1 = x → p.2 ∈ s } ∈ uniformity))
@[pattern] def uniform_space.mk' {α} (t : topological_space α)
(c : uniform_space.core α)
(is_open_uniformity : ∀s:set α, t.is_open s ↔
(∀x∈s, { p : α × α | p.1 = x → p.2 ∈ s } ∈ c.uniformity)) :
uniform_space α := ⟨c, is_open_uniformity⟩
def uniform_space.of_core {α : Type u} (u : uniform_space.core α) : uniform_space α :=
{ to_core := u,
to_topological_space := u.to_topological_space,
is_open_uniformity := assume a, iff.refl _ }
def uniform_space.of_core_eq {α : Type u} (u : uniform_space.core α) (t : topological_space α)
(h : t = u.to_topological_space) : uniform_space α :=
{ to_core := u,
to_topological_space := t,
is_open_uniformity := assume a, h.symm ▸ iff.refl _ }
lemma uniform_space.to_core_to_topological_space (u : uniform_space α) :
u.to_core.to_topological_space = u.to_topological_space :=
topological_space_eq $ funext $ assume s,
by rw [uniform_space.core.to_topological_space, uniform_space.is_open_uniformity]
@[extensionality]
lemma uniform_space_eq : ∀{u₁ u₂ : uniform_space α}, u₁.uniformity = u₂.uniformity → u₁ = u₂
| (uniform_space.mk' t₁ u₁ o₁) (uniform_space.mk' t₂ u₂ o₂) h :=
have u₁ = u₂, from uniform_space.core_eq h,
have t₁ = t₂, from topological_space_eq $ funext $ assume s, by rw [o₁, o₂]; simp [this],
by simp [*]
lemma uniform_space.of_core_eq_to_core
(u : uniform_space α) (t : topological_space α) (h : t = u.to_core.to_topological_space) :
uniform_space.of_core_eq u.to_core t h = u :=
uniform_space_eq rfl
section uniform_space
variables [uniform_space α]
/-- The uniformity is a filter on α × α (inferred from an ambient uniform space
structure on α). -/
def uniformity (α : Type u) [uniform_space α] : filter (α × α) :=
(@uniform_space.to_core α _).uniformity
local notation `𝓤` := uniformity
lemma is_open_uniformity {s : set α} :
is_open s ↔ (∀x∈s, { p : α × α | p.1 = x → p.2 ∈ s } ∈ 𝓤 α) :=
uniform_space.is_open_uniformity s
lemma refl_le_uniformity : principal id_rel ≤ 𝓤 α :=
(@uniform_space.to_core α _).refl
lemma refl_mem_uniformity {x : α} {s : set (α × α)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
(x, x) ∈ s :=
refl_le_uniformity h rfl
lemma symm_le_uniformity : map (@prod.swap α α) (𝓤 _) ≤ (𝓤 _) :=
(@uniform_space.to_core α _).symm
lemma comp_le_uniformity : (𝓤 α).lift' (λs:set (α×α), comp_rel s s) ≤ 𝓤 α :=
(@uniform_space.to_core α _).comp
lemma tendsto_swap_uniformity : tendsto (@prod.swap α α) (𝓤 α) (𝓤 α) :=
symm_le_uniformity
lemma tendsto_const_uniformity {a : α} {f : filter β} : tendsto (λ _, (a, a)) f (𝓤 α) :=
assume s hs,
show {x | (a, a) ∈ s} ∈ f,
from univ_mem_sets' $ assume b, refl_mem_uniformity hs
lemma comp_mem_uniformity_sets {s : set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, comp_rel t t ⊆ s :=
have s ∈ (𝓤 α).lift' (λt:set (α×α), comp_rel t t),
from comp_le_uniformity hs,
(mem_lift'_sets $ monotone_comp_rel monotone_id monotone_id).mp this
lemma symm_of_uniformity {s : set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, (∀a b, (a, b) ∈ t → (b, a) ∈ t) ∧ t ⊆ s :=
have preimage prod.swap s ∈ 𝓤 α, from symm_le_uniformity hs,
⟨s ∩ preimage prod.swap s, inter_mem_sets hs this, assume a b ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, ⟨h₂, h₁⟩, inter_subset_left _ _⟩
lemma comp_symm_of_uniformity {s : set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, (∀{a b}, (a, b) ∈ t → (b, a) ∈ t) ∧ comp_rel t t ⊆ s :=
let ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs in
let ⟨t', ht', ht'₁, ht'₂⟩ := symm_of_uniformity ht₁ in
⟨t', ht', ht'₁, subset.trans (monotone_comp_rel monotone_id monotone_id ht'₂) ht₂⟩
lemma uniformity_le_symm : 𝓤 α ≤ (@prod.swap α α) <$> 𝓤 α :=
by rw [map_swap_eq_comap_swap];
from map_le_iff_le_comap.1 tendsto_swap_uniformity
lemma uniformity_eq_symm : 𝓤 α = (@prod.swap α α) <$> 𝓤 α :=
le_antisymm uniformity_le_symm symm_le_uniformity
theorem uniformity_lift_le_swap {g : set (α×α) → filter β} {f : filter β} (hg : monotone g)
(h : (𝓤 α).lift (λs, g (preimage prod.swap s)) ≤ f) : (𝓤 α).lift g ≤ f :=
calc (𝓤 α).lift g ≤ (filter.map (@prod.swap α α) $ 𝓤 α).lift g :
lift_mono uniformity_le_symm (le_refl _)
... ≤ _ :
by rw [map_lift_eq2 hg, image_swap_eq_preimage_swap]; exact h
lemma uniformity_lift_le_comp {f : set (α×α) → filter β} (h : monotone f):
(𝓤 α).lift (λs, f (comp_rel s s)) ≤ (𝓤 α).lift f :=
calc (𝓤 α).lift (λs, f (comp_rel s s)) =
((𝓤 α).lift' (λs:set (α×α), comp_rel s s)).lift f :
begin
rw [lift_lift'_assoc],
exact monotone_comp_rel monotone_id monotone_id,
exact h
end
... ≤ (𝓤 α).lift f : lift_mono comp_le_uniformity (le_refl _)
lemma comp_le_uniformity3 :
(𝓤 α).lift' (λs:set (α×α), comp_rel s (comp_rel s s)) ≤ (𝓤 α) :=
calc (𝓤 α).lift' (λd, comp_rel d (comp_rel d d)) =
(𝓤 α).lift (λs, (𝓤 α).lift' (λt:set(α×α), comp_rel s (comp_rel t t))) :
begin
rw [lift_lift'_same_eq_lift'],
exact (assume x, monotone_comp_rel monotone_const $ monotone_comp_rel monotone_id monotone_id),
exact (assume x, monotone_comp_rel monotone_id monotone_const),
end
... ≤ (𝓤 α).lift (λs, (𝓤 α).lift' (λt:set(α×α), comp_rel s t)) :
lift_mono' $ assume s hs, @uniformity_lift_le_comp α _ _ (principal ∘ comp_rel s) $
monotone_comp (monotone_comp_rel monotone_const monotone_id) monotone_principal
... = (𝓤 α).lift' (λs:set(α×α), comp_rel s s) :
lift_lift'_same_eq_lift'
(assume s, monotone_comp_rel monotone_const monotone_id)
(assume s, monotone_comp_rel monotone_id monotone_const)
... ≤ (𝓤 α) : comp_le_uniformity
lemma mem_nhds_uniformity_iff {x : α} {s : set α} :
s ∈ nhds x ↔ {p : α × α | p.1 = x → p.2 ∈ s} ∈ 𝓤 α :=
⟨ begin
simp only [mem_nhds_sets_iff, is_open_uniformity, and_imp, exists_imp_distrib],
exact assume t ts ht xt, by filter_upwards [ht x xt] assume ⟨x', y⟩ h eq, ts $ h eq
end,
assume hs,
mem_nhds_sets_iff.mpr ⟨{x | {p : α × α | p.1 = x → p.2 ∈ s} ∈ 𝓤 α},
assume x' hx', refl_mem_uniformity hx' rfl,
is_open_uniformity.mpr $ assume x' hx',
let ⟨t, ht, tr⟩ := comp_mem_uniformity_sets hx' in
by filter_upwards [ht] assume ⟨a, b⟩ hp' (hax' : a = x'),
by filter_upwards [ht] assume ⟨a, b'⟩ hp'' (hab : a = b),
have hp : (x', b) ∈ t, from hax' ▸ hp',
have (b, b') ∈ t, from hab ▸ hp'',
have (x', b') ∈ comp_rel t t, from ⟨b, hp, this⟩,
show b' ∈ s,
from tr this rfl,
hs⟩⟩
lemma nhds_eq_comap_uniformity {x : α} : nhds x = (𝓤 α).comap (prod.mk x) :=
by ext s; rw [mem_nhds_uniformity_iff, mem_comap_sets]; from iff.intro
(assume hs, ⟨_, hs, assume x hx, hx rfl⟩)
(assume ⟨t, h, ht⟩, (𝓤 α).sets_of_superset h $
assume ⟨p₁, p₂⟩ hp (h : p₁ = x), ht $ by simp [h.symm, hp])
lemma nhds_eq_uniformity {x : α} : nhds x = (𝓤 α).lift' (λs:set (α×α), {y | (x, y) ∈ s}) :=
begin
ext s,
rw [mem_lift'_sets], tactic.swap, apply monotone_preimage,
simp [mem_nhds_uniformity_iff],
exact ⟨assume h, ⟨_, h, assume y h, h rfl⟩,
assume ⟨t, h₁, h₂⟩,
(𝓤 α).sets_of_superset h₁ $
assume ⟨x', y⟩ hp (eq : x' = x), h₂ $
show (x, y) ∈ t, from eq ▸ hp⟩
end
lemma mem_nhds_left (x : α) {s : set (α×α)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
{y : α | (x, y) ∈ s} ∈ nhds x :=
have nhds x ≤ principal {y : α | (x, y) ∈ s},
by rw [nhds_eq_uniformity]; exact infi_le_of_le s (infi_le _ h),
by simp at this; assumption
lemma mem_nhds_right (y : α) {s : set (α×α)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
{x : α | (x, y) ∈ s} ∈ nhds y :=
mem_nhds_left _ (symm_le_uniformity h)
lemma tendsto_right_nhds_uniformity {a : α} : tendsto (λa', (a', a)) (nhds a) (𝓤 α) :=
assume s, mem_nhds_right a
lemma tendsto_left_nhds_uniformity {a : α} : tendsto (λa', (a, a')) (nhds a) (𝓤 α) :=
assume s, mem_nhds_left a
lemma lift_nhds_left {x : α} {g : set α → filter β} (hg : monotone g) :
(nhds x).lift g = (𝓤 α).lift (λs:set (α×α), g {y | (x, y) ∈ s}) :=
eq.trans
begin
rw [nhds_eq_uniformity],
exact (filter.lift_assoc $ monotone_comp monotone_preimage $ monotone_comp monotone_preimage monotone_principal)
end
(congr_arg _ $ funext $ assume s, filter.lift_principal hg)
lemma lift_nhds_right {x : α} {g : set α → filter β} (hg : monotone g) :
(nhds x).lift g = (𝓤 α).lift (λs:set (α×α), g {y | (y, x) ∈ s}) :=
calc (nhds x).lift g = (𝓤 α).lift (λs:set (α×α), g {y | (x, y) ∈ s}) : lift_nhds_left hg
... = ((@prod.swap α α) <$> (𝓤 α)).lift (λs:set (α×α), g {y | (x, y) ∈ s}) : by rw [←uniformity_eq_symm]
... = (𝓤 α).lift (λs:set (α×α), g {y | (x, y) ∈ image prod.swap s}) :
map_lift_eq2 $ monotone_comp monotone_preimage hg
... = _ : by simp [image_swap_eq_preimage_swap]
lemma nhds_nhds_eq_uniformity_uniformity_prod {a b : α} :
filter.prod (nhds a) (nhds b) =
(𝓤 α).lift (λs:set (α×α), (𝓤 α).lift' (λt:set (α×α),
set.prod {y : α | (y, a) ∈ s} {y : α | (b, y) ∈ t})) :=
begin
rw [prod_def],
show (nhds a).lift (λs:set α, (nhds b).lift (λt:set α, principal (set.prod s t))) = _,
rw [lift_nhds_right],
apply congr_arg, funext s,
rw [lift_nhds_left],
refl,
exact monotone_comp (monotone_prod monotone_const monotone_id) monotone_principal,
exact (monotone_lift' monotone_const $ monotone_lam $
assume x, monotone_prod monotone_id monotone_const)
end
lemma nhds_eq_uniformity_prod {a b : α} :
nhds (a, b) =
(𝓤 α).lift' (λs:set (α×α), set.prod {y : α | (y, a) ∈ s} {y : α | (b, y) ∈ s}) :=
begin
rw [nhds_prod_eq, nhds_nhds_eq_uniformity_uniformity_prod, lift_lift'_same_eq_lift'],
{ intro s, exact monotone_prod monotone_const monotone_preimage },
{ intro t, exact monotone_prod monotone_preimage monotone_const }
end
lemma nhdset_of_mem_uniformity {d : set (α×α)} (s : set (α×α)) (hd : d ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃(t : set (α×α)), is_open t ∧ s ⊆ t ∧ t ⊆ {p | ∃x y, (p.1, x) ∈ d ∧ (x, y) ∈ s ∧ (y, p.2) ∈ d} :=
let cl_d := {p:α×α | ∃x y, (p.1, x) ∈ d ∧ (x, y) ∈ s ∧ (y, p.2) ∈ d} in
have ∀p ∈ s, ∃t ⊆ cl_d, is_open t ∧ p ∈ t, from
assume ⟨x, y⟩ hp, mem_nhds_sets_iff.mp $
show cl_d ∈ nhds (x, y),
begin
rw [nhds_eq_uniformity_prod, mem_lift'_sets],
exact ⟨d, hd, assume ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨ha, hb⟩, ⟨x, y, ha, hp, hb⟩⟩,
exact monotone_prod monotone_preimage monotone_preimage
end,
have ∃t:(Π(p:α×α) (h:p ∈ s), set (α×α)),
∀p, ∀h:p ∈ s, t p h ⊆ cl_d ∧ is_open (t p h) ∧ p ∈ t p h,
by simp [classical.skolem] at this; simp; assumption,
match this with
| ⟨t, ht⟩ :=
⟨(⋃ p:α×α, ⋃ h : p ∈ s, t p h : set (α×α)),
is_open_Union $ assume (p:α×α), is_open_Union $ assume hp, (ht p hp).right.left,
assume ⟨a, b⟩ hp, begin simp; exact ⟨a, b, hp, (ht (a,b) hp).right.right⟩ end,
Union_subset $ assume p, Union_subset $ assume hp, (ht p hp).left⟩
end
lemma closure_eq_inter_uniformity {t : set (α×α)} :
closure t = (⋂ d ∈ 𝓤 α, comp_rel d (comp_rel t d)) :=
set.ext $ assume ⟨a, b⟩,
calc (a, b) ∈ closure t ↔ (nhds (a, b) ⊓ principal t ≠ ⊥) : by simp [closure_eq_nhds]
... ↔ (((@prod.swap α α) <$> 𝓤 α).lift'
(λ (s : set (α × α)), set.prod {x : α | (x, a) ∈ s} {y : α | (b, y) ∈ s}) ⊓ principal t ≠ ⊥) :
by rw [←uniformity_eq_symm, nhds_eq_uniformity_prod]
... ↔ ((map (@prod.swap α α) (𝓤 α)).lift'
(λ (s : set (α × α)), set.prod {x : α | (x, a) ∈ s} {y : α | (b, y) ∈ s}) ⊓ principal t ≠ ⊥) :
by refl
... ↔ ((𝓤 α).lift'
(λ (s : set (α × α)), set.prod {y : α | (a, y) ∈ s} {x : α | (x, b) ∈ s}) ⊓ principal t ≠ ⊥) :
begin
rw [map_lift'_eq2],
simp [image_swap_eq_preimage_swap, function.comp],
exact monotone_prod monotone_preimage monotone_preimage
end
... ↔ (∀s ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃x, x ∈ set.prod {y : α | (a, y) ∈ s} {x : α | (x, b) ∈ s} ∩ t) :
begin
rw [lift'_inf_principal_eq, lift'_neq_bot_iff],
apply forall_congr, intro s, rw [ne_empty_iff_exists_mem],
exact monotone_inter (monotone_prod monotone_preimage monotone_preimage) monotone_const
end
... ↔ (∀ s ∈ 𝓤 α, (a, b) ∈ comp_rel s (comp_rel t s)) :
forall_congr $ assume s, forall_congr $ assume hs,
⟨assume ⟨⟨x, y⟩, ⟨⟨hx, hy⟩, hxyt⟩⟩, ⟨x, hx, y, hxyt, hy⟩,
assume ⟨x, hx, y, hxyt, hy⟩, ⟨⟨x, y⟩, ⟨⟨hx, hy⟩, hxyt⟩⟩⟩
... ↔ _ : by simp
lemma uniformity_eq_uniformity_closure : 𝓤 α = (𝓤 α).lift' closure :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume s, le_infi $ assume hs, by simp; filter_upwards [hs] subset_closure)
(calc (𝓤 α).lift' closure ≤ (𝓤 α).lift' (λd, comp_rel d (comp_rel d d)) :
lift'_mono' (by intros s hs; rw [closure_eq_inter_uniformity]; exact bInter_subset_of_mem hs)
... ≤ (𝓤 α) : comp_le_uniformity3)
lemma uniformity_eq_uniformity_interior : 𝓤 α = (𝓤 α).lift' interior :=
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume d, le_infi $ assume hd,
let ⟨s, hs, hs_comp⟩ := (mem_lift'_sets $
monotone_comp_rel monotone_id $ monotone_comp_rel monotone_id monotone_id).mp (comp_le_uniformity3 hd) in
let ⟨t, ht, hst, ht_comp⟩ := nhdset_of_mem_uniformity s hs in
have s ⊆ interior d, from
calc s ⊆ t : hst
... ⊆ interior d : (subset_interior_iff_subset_of_open ht).mpr $
assume x, assume : x ∈ t, let ⟨x, y, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := ht_comp this in hs_comp ⟨x, h₁, y, h₂, h₃⟩,
have interior d ∈ 𝓤 α, by filter_upwards [hs] this,
by simp [this])
(assume s hs, ((𝓤 α).lift' interior).sets_of_superset (mem_lift' hs) interior_subset)
lemma interior_mem_uniformity {s : set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
interior s ∈ 𝓤 α :=
by rw [uniformity_eq_uniformity_interior]; exact mem_lift' hs
lemma mem_uniformity_is_closed [uniform_space α] {s : set (α×α)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃t ∈ 𝓤 α, is_closed t ∧ t ⊆ s :=
have s ∈ (𝓤 α).lift' closure, by rwa [uniformity_eq_uniformity_closure] at h,
have ∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, closure t ⊆ s,
by rwa [mem_lift'_sets] at this; apply closure_mono,
let ⟨t, ht, hst⟩ := this in
⟨closure t, (𝓤 α).sets_of_superset ht subset_closure, is_closed_closure, hst⟩
/- uniform continuity -/
def uniform_continuous [uniform_space β] (f : α → β) :=
tendsto (λx:α×α, (f x.1, f x.2)) (𝓤 α) (𝓤 β)
theorem uniform_continuous_def [uniform_space β] {f : α → β} :
uniform_continuous f ↔ ∀ r ∈ 𝓤 β,
{x : α × α | (f x.1, f x.2) ∈ r} ∈ 𝓤 α :=
iff.rfl
lemma uniform_continuous_of_const [uniform_space β] {c : α → β} (h : ∀a b, c a = c b) :
uniform_continuous c :=
have (λ (x : α × α), (c (x.fst), c (x.snd))) ⁻¹' id_rel = univ, from
eq_univ_iff_forall.2 $ assume ⟨a, b⟩, h a b,
le_trans (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $ by simp [comap_principal, this, univ_mem_sets]) refl_le_uniformity
lemma uniform_continuous_id : uniform_continuous (@id α) :=
by simp [uniform_continuous]; exact tendsto_id
lemma uniform_continuous_const [uniform_space β] {b : β} : uniform_continuous (λa:α, b) :=
@tendsto_const_uniformity _ _ _ b (𝓤 α)
lemma uniform_continuous.comp [uniform_space β] [uniform_space γ] {f : α → β} {g : β → γ}
(hg : uniform_continuous g) (hf : uniform_continuous f) : uniform_continuous (g ∘ f) :=
hg.comp hf
lemma uniform_continuous.continuous [uniform_space β] {f : α → β}
(hf : uniform_continuous f) : continuous f :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.mpr $ assume a,
calc map f (nhds a) ≤
(map (λp:α×α, (f p.1, f p.2)) (𝓤 α)).lift' (λs:set (β×β), {y | (f a, y) ∈ s}) :
begin
rw [nhds_eq_uniformity, map_lift'_eq, map_lift'_eq2],
exact (lift'_mono' $ assume s hs b ⟨a', (ha' : (_, a') ∈ s), a'_eq⟩,
⟨(a, a'), ha', show (f a, f a') = (f a, b), from a'_eq ▸ rfl⟩),
exact monotone_preimage,
exact monotone_preimage
end
... ≤ nhds (f a) :
by rw [nhds_eq_uniformity]; exact lift'_mono hf (le_refl _)
end uniform_space
end
local notation `𝓤` := uniformity
section constructions
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
instance : partial_order (uniform_space α) :=
{ le := λt s, t.uniformity ≤ s.uniformity,
le_antisymm := assume t s h₁ h₂, uniform_space_eq $ le_antisymm h₁ h₂,
le_refl := assume t, le_refl _,
le_trans := assume a b c h₁ h₂, le_trans h₁ h₂ }
instance : has_Inf (uniform_space α) :=
⟨assume s, uniform_space.of_core {
uniformity := (⨅u∈s, @uniformity α u),
refl := le_infi $ assume u, le_infi $ assume hu, u.refl,
symm := le_infi $ assume u, le_infi $ assume hu,
le_trans (map_mono $ infi_le_of_le _ $ infi_le _ hu) u.symm,
comp := le_infi $ assume u, le_infi $ assume hu,
le_trans (lift'_mono (infi_le_of_le _ $ infi_le _ hu) $ le_refl _) u.comp }⟩
private lemma Inf_le {tt : set (uniform_space α)} {t : uniform_space α} (h : t ∈ tt) :
Inf tt ≤ t :=
show (⨅u∈tt, @uniformity α u) ≤ t.uniformity,
from infi_le_of_le t $ infi_le _ h
private lemma le_Inf {tt : set (uniform_space α)} {t : uniform_space α} (h : ∀t'∈tt, t ≤ t') :
t ≤ Inf tt :=
show t.uniformity ≤ (⨅u∈tt, @uniformity α u),
from le_infi $ assume t', le_infi $ assume ht', h t' ht'
instance : has_top (uniform_space α) :=
⟨uniform_space.of_core { uniformity := ⊤, refl := le_top, symm := le_top, comp := le_top }⟩
instance : has_bot (uniform_space α) :=
⟨{ to_topological_space := ⊥,
uniformity := principal id_rel,
refl := le_refl _,
symm := by simp [tendsto]; apply subset.refl,
comp :=
begin
rw [lift'_principal], {simp},
exact monotone_comp_rel monotone_id monotone_id
end,
is_open_uniformity :=
assume s, by simp [is_open_fold, subset_def, id_rel] {contextual := tt } } ⟩
instance : complete_lattice (uniform_space α) :=
{ sup := λa b, Inf {x | a ≤ x ∧ b ≤ x},
le_sup_left := λ a b, le_Inf (λ _ ⟨h, _⟩, h),
le_sup_right := λ a b, le_Inf (λ _ ⟨_, h⟩, h),
sup_le := λ a b c h₁ h₂, Inf_le ⟨h₁, h₂⟩,
inf := λ a b, Inf {a, b},
le_inf := λ a b c h₁ h₂, le_Inf (λ u h,
by { cases h, exact h.symm ▸ h₂, exact (mem_singleton_iff.1 h).symm ▸ h₁ }),
inf_le_left := λ a b, Inf_le (by simp),
inf_le_right := λ a b, Inf_le (by simp),
top := ⊤,
le_top := λ a, show a.uniformity ≤ ⊤, from le_top,
bot := ⊥,
bot_le := λ u, u.refl,
Sup := λ tt, Inf {t | ∀ t' ∈ tt, t' ≤ t},
le_Sup := λ s u h, le_Inf (λ u' h', h' u h),
Sup_le := λ s u h, Inf_le h,
Inf := Inf,
le_Inf := λ s a hs, le_Inf hs,
Inf_le := λ s a ha, Inf_le ha,
..uniform_space.partial_order }
lemma infi_uniformity {ι : Sort*} {u : ι → uniform_space α} :
(infi u).uniformity = (⨅i, (u i).uniformity) :=
show (⨅a (h : ∃i:ι, u i = a), a.uniformity) = _, from
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume i, infi_le_of_le (u i) $ infi_le _ ⟨i, rfl⟩)
(le_infi $ assume a, le_infi $ assume ⟨i, (ha : u i = a)⟩, ha ▸ infi_le _ _)
lemma inf_uniformity {u v : uniform_space α} :
(u ⊓ v).uniformity = u.uniformity ⊓ v.uniformity :=
have (u ⊓ v) = (⨅i (h : i = u ∨ i = v), i), by simp [infi_or, infi_inf_eq],
calc (u ⊓ v).uniformity = ((⨅i (h : i = u ∨ i = v), i) : uniform_space α).uniformity : by rw [this]
... = _ : by simp [infi_uniformity, infi_or, infi_inf_eq]
instance inhabited_uniform_space : inhabited (uniform_space α) := ⟨⊥⟩
/-- Given `f : α → β` and a uniformity `u` on `β`, the inverse image of `u` under `f`
is the inverse image in the filter sense of the induced function `α × α → β × β`. -/
def uniform_space.comap (f : α → β) (u : uniform_space β) : uniform_space α :=
{ uniformity := u.uniformity.comap (λp:α×α, (f p.1, f p.2)),
to_topological_space := u.to_topological_space.induced f,
refl := le_trans (by simp; exact assume ⟨a, b⟩ (h : a = b), h ▸ rfl) (comap_mono u.refl),
symm := by simp [tendsto_comap_iff, prod.swap, (∘)]; exact tendsto_swap_uniformity.comp tendsto_comap,
comp := le_trans
begin
rw [comap_lift'_eq, comap_lift'_eq2],
exact (lift'_mono' $ assume s hs ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨x, h₁, h₂⟩, ⟨f x, h₁, h₂⟩),
repeat { exact monotone_comp_rel monotone_id monotone_id }
end
(comap_mono u.comp),
is_open_uniformity := λ s, begin
change (@is_open α (u.to_topological_space.induced f) s ↔ _),
simp [is_open_iff_nhds, nhds_induced_eq_comap, mem_nhds_uniformity_iff, filter.comap, and_comm],
refine ball_congr (λ x hx, ⟨_, _⟩),
{ rintro ⟨t, hts, ht⟩, refine ⟨_, ht, _⟩,
rintro ⟨x₁, x₂⟩ h rfl, exact hts (h rfl) },
{ rintro ⟨t, ht, hts⟩,
exact ⟨{y | (f x, y) ∈ t}, λ y hy, @hts (x, y) hy rfl,
mem_nhds_uniformity_iff.1 $ mem_nhds_left _ ht⟩ }
end }
lemma uniform_space_comap_id {α : Type*} : uniform_space.comap (id : α → α) = id :=
by ext u ; dsimp [uniform_space.comap] ; rw [prod.id_prod, filter.comap_id]
lemma uniform_space.comap_comap_comp {α β γ} [uγ : uniform_space γ] {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} :
uniform_space.comap (g ∘ f) uγ = uniform_space.comap f (uniform_space.comap g uγ) :=
by ext ; dsimp [uniform_space.comap] ; rw filter.comap_comap_comp
lemma uniform_continuous_iff {α β} [uα : uniform_space α] [uβ : uniform_space β] (f : α → β) :
uniform_continuous f ↔ uα ≤ uβ.comap f :=
filter.map_le_iff_le_comap
lemma uniform_continuous_comap {f : α → β} [u : uniform_space β] :
@uniform_continuous α β (uniform_space.comap f u) u f :=
tendsto_comap
theorem to_topological_space_comap {f : α → β} {u : uniform_space β} :
@uniform_space.to_topological_space _ (uniform_space.comap f u) =
topological_space.induced f (@uniform_space.to_topological_space β u) :=
eq_of_nhds_eq_nhds $ assume a,
begin
simp [nhds_induced_eq_comap, nhds_eq_uniformity, nhds_eq_uniformity],
change (u.uniformity.comap (λp:α×α, (f p.1, f p.2))).lift' (preimage (λa', (a, a'))) =
comap f ((𝓤 β).lift' (preimage (λb, (f a, b)))),
rw [comap_lift'_eq monotone_preimage, comap_lift'_eq2 monotone_preimage],
exact rfl
end
lemma uniform_continuous_comap' {f : γ → β} {g : α → γ} [v : uniform_space β] [u : uniform_space α]
(h : uniform_continuous (f ∘ g)) : @uniform_continuous α γ u (uniform_space.comap f v) g :=
tendsto_comap_iff.2 h
lemma to_topological_space_mono {u₁ u₂ : uniform_space α} (h : u₁ ≤ u₂) :
@uniform_space.to_topological_space _ u₁ ≤ @uniform_space.to_topological_space _ u₂ :=
le_of_nhds_le_nhds $ assume a,
by rw [@nhds_eq_uniformity α u₁ a, @nhds_eq_uniformity α u₂ a]; exact (lift'_mono h $ le_refl _)
lemma to_topological_space_bot : @uniform_space.to_topological_space α ⊥ = ⊥ := rfl
lemma to_topological_space_top : @uniform_space.to_topological_space α ⊤ = ⊤ :=
top_unique $ assume s hs, classical.by_cases
(assume : s = ∅, this.symm ▸ @is_open_empty _ ⊤)
(assume : s ≠ ∅,
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_mem_of_ne_empty this in
have s = univ, from top_unique $ assume y hy, hs x hx (x, y) rfl,
this.symm ▸ @is_open_univ _ ⊤)
lemma to_topological_space_infi {ι : Sort*} {u : ι → uniform_space α} :
(infi u).to_topological_space = ⨅i, (u i).to_topological_space :=
classical.by_cases
(assume h : nonempty ι,
eq_of_nhds_eq_nhds $ assume a,
begin
rw [nhds_infi, nhds_eq_uniformity],
change (infi u).uniformity.lift' (preimage $ prod.mk a) = _,
begin
rw [infi_uniformity, lift'_infi],
exact (congr_arg _ $ funext $ assume i, (@nhds_eq_uniformity α (u i) a).symm),
exact h,
exact assume a b, rfl
end
end)
(assume : ¬ nonempty ι,
le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume i, to_topological_space_mono $ infi_le _ _)
(have infi u = ⊤, from top_unique $ le_infi $ assume i, (this ⟨i⟩).elim,
have @uniform_space.to_topological_space _ (infi u) = ⊤,
from this.symm ▸ to_topological_space_top,
this.symm ▸ le_top))
lemma to_topological_space_Inf {s : set (uniform_space α)} :
(Inf s).to_topological_space = (⨅i∈s, @uniform_space.to_topological_space α i) :=
begin
rw [Inf_eq_infi, to_topological_space_infi],
apply congr rfl,
funext x,
exact to_topological_space_infi
end
lemma to_topological_space_inf {u v : uniform_space α} :
(u ⊓ v).to_topological_space = u.to_topological_space ⊓ v.to_topological_space :=
by rw [to_topological_space_Inf, infi_pair]
instance : uniform_space empty := ⊥
instance : uniform_space unit := ⊥
instance : uniform_space bool := ⊥
instance : uniform_space ℕ := ⊥
instance : uniform_space ℤ := ⊥
instance {p : α → Prop} [t : uniform_space α] : uniform_space (subtype p) :=
uniform_space.comap subtype.val t
lemma uniformity_subtype {p : α → Prop} [t : uniform_space α] :
𝓤 (subtype p) = comap (λq:subtype p × subtype p, (q.1.1, q.2.1)) (𝓤 α) :=
rfl
lemma uniform_continuous_subtype_val {p : α → Prop} [uniform_space α] :
uniform_continuous (subtype.val : {a : α // p a} → α) :=
uniform_continuous_comap
lemma uniform_continuous_subtype_mk {p : α → Prop} [uniform_space α] [uniform_space β]
{f : β → α} (hf : uniform_continuous f) (h : ∀x, p (f x)) :
uniform_continuous (λx, ⟨f x, h x⟩ : β → subtype p) :=
uniform_continuous_comap' hf
lemma tendsto_of_uniform_continuous_subtype
[uniform_space α] [uniform_space β] {f : α → β} {s : set α} {a : α}
(hf : uniform_continuous (λx:s, f x.val)) (ha : s ∈ nhds a) :
tendsto f (nhds a) (nhds (f a)) :=
by rw [(@map_nhds_subtype_val_eq α _ s a (mem_of_nhds ha) ha).symm]; exact
tendsto_map' (continuous_iff_continuous_at.mp hf.continuous _)
section prod
/- a similar product space is possible on the function space (uniformity of pointwise convergence),
but we want to have the uniformity of uniform convergence on function spaces -/
instance [u₁ : uniform_space α] [u₂ : uniform_space β] : uniform_space (α × β) :=
uniform_space.of_core_eq
(u₁.comap prod.fst ⊓ u₂.comap prod.snd).to_core
prod.topological_space
(calc prod.topological_space = (u₁.comap prod.fst ⊓ u₂.comap prod.snd).to_topological_space :
by rw [to_topological_space_inf, to_topological_space_comap, to_topological_space_comap]; refl
... = _ : by rw [uniform_space.to_core_to_topological_space])
theorem uniformity_prod [uniform_space α] [uniform_space β] : 𝓤 (α × β) =
(𝓤 α).comap (λp:(α × β) × α × β, (p.1.1, p.2.1)) ⊓
(𝓤 β).comap (λp:(α × β) × α × β, (p.1.2, p.2.2)) :=
inf_uniformity
lemma uniformity_prod_eq_prod [uniform_space α] [uniform_space β] :
𝓤 (α×β) =
map (λp:(α×α)×(β×β), ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) (filter.prod (𝓤 α) (𝓤 β)) :=
have map (λp:(α×α)×(β×β), ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) =
comap (λp:(α×β)×(α×β), ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))),
from funext $ assume f, map_eq_comap_of_inverse
(funext $ assume ⟨⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩⟩, rfl) (funext $ assume ⟨⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩⟩, rfl),
by rw [this, uniformity_prod, filter.prod, comap_inf, comap_comap_comp, comap_comap_comp]
lemma mem_map_sets_iff' {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {f : filter α} {m : α → β} {t : set β} :
t ∈ (map m f).sets ↔ (∃s∈f, m '' s ⊆ t) :=
mem_map_sets_iff
lemma mem_uniformity_of_uniform_continuous_invarant [uniform_space α] {s:set (α×α)} {f : α → α → α}
(hf : uniform_continuous (λp:α×α, f p.1 p.2)) (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃u∈𝓤 α, ∀a b c, (a, b) ∈ u → (f a c, f b c) ∈ s :=
begin
rw [uniform_continuous, uniformity_prod_eq_prod, tendsto_map'_iff, (∘)] at hf,
rcases mem_map_sets_iff'.1 (hf hs) with ⟨t, ht, hts⟩, clear hf,
rcases mem_prod_iff.1 ht with ⟨u, hu, v, hv, huvt⟩, clear ht,
refine ⟨u, hu, assume a b c hab, hts $ (mem_image _ _ _).2 ⟨⟨⟨a, b⟩, ⟨c, c⟩⟩, huvt ⟨_, _⟩, _⟩⟩,
exact hab,
exact refl_mem_uniformity hv,
refl
end
lemma mem_uniform_prod [t₁ : uniform_space α] [t₂ : uniform_space β] {a : set (α × α)} {b : set (β × β)}
(ha : a ∈ 𝓤 α) (hb : b ∈ 𝓤 β) :
{p:(α×β)×(α×β) | (p.1.1, p.2.1) ∈ a ∧ (p.1.2, p.2.2) ∈ b } ∈ (@uniformity (α × β) _) :=
by rw [uniformity_prod]; exact inter_mem_inf_sets (preimage_mem_comap ha) (preimage_mem_comap hb)
lemma tendsto_prod_uniformity_fst [uniform_space α] [uniform_space β] :
tendsto (λp:(α×β)×(α×β), (p.1.1, p.2.1)) (𝓤 (α × β)) (𝓤 α) :=
le_trans (map_mono (@inf_le_left (uniform_space (α×β)) _ _ _)) map_comap_le
lemma tendsto_prod_uniformity_snd [uniform_space α] [uniform_space β] :
tendsto (λp:(α×β)×(α×β), (p.1.2, p.2.2)) (𝓤 (α × β)) (𝓤 β) :=
le_trans (map_mono (@inf_le_right (uniform_space (α×β)) _ _ _)) map_comap_le
lemma uniform_continuous_fst [uniform_space α] [uniform_space β] : uniform_continuous (λp:α×β, p.1) :=
tendsto_prod_uniformity_fst
lemma uniform_continuous_snd [uniform_space α] [uniform_space β] : uniform_continuous (λp:α×β, p.2) :=
tendsto_prod_uniformity_snd
variables [uniform_space α] [uniform_space β] [uniform_space γ]
lemma uniform_continuous.prod_mk
{f₁ : α → β} {f₂ : α → γ} (h₁ : uniform_continuous f₁) (h₂ : uniform_continuous f₂) :
uniform_continuous (λa, (f₁ a, f₂ a)) :=
by rw [uniform_continuous, uniformity_prod]; exact
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₁, tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₂⟩
lemma uniform_continuous.prod_mk_left {f : α × β → γ} (h : uniform_continuous f) (b) :
uniform_continuous (λ a, f (a,b)) :=
h.comp (uniform_continuous_id.prod_mk uniform_continuous_const)
lemma uniform_continuous.prod_mk_right {f : α × β → γ} (h : uniform_continuous f) (a) :
uniform_continuous (λ b, f (a,b)) :=
h.comp (uniform_continuous_const.prod_mk uniform_continuous_id)
lemma to_topological_space_prod [u : uniform_space α] [v : uniform_space β] :
@uniform_space.to_topological_space (α × β) prod.uniform_space =
@prod.topological_space α β u.to_topological_space v.to_topological_space := rfl
end prod
lemma to_topological_space_subtype [u : uniform_space α] {p : α → Prop} :
@uniform_space.to_topological_space (subtype p) subtype.uniform_space =
@subtype.topological_space α p u.to_topological_space := rfl
section sum
variables [uniform_space α] [uniform_space β]
open sum
/-- Uniformity on a disjoint union. Entourages of the diagonal in the union are obtained
by taking independently an entourage of the diagonal in the first part, and an entourage of
the diagonal in the second part. -/
def uniform_space.core.sum : uniform_space.core (α ⊕ β) :=
uniform_space.core.mk'
(map (λ p : α × α, (inl p.1, inl p.2)) (𝓤 α) ⊔ map (λ p : β × β, (inr p.1, inr p.2)) (𝓤 β))
(λ r ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ x, by cases x; [apply refl_mem_uniformity H₁, apply refl_mem_uniformity H₂])
(λ r ⟨H₁, H₂⟩, ⟨symm_le_uniformity H₁, symm_le_uniformity H₂⟩)
(λ r ⟨Hrα, Hrβ⟩, begin
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets Hrα with ⟨tα, htα, Htα⟩,
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets Hrβ with ⟨tβ, htβ, Htβ⟩,
refine ⟨_,
⟨mem_map_sets_iff.2 ⟨tα, htα, subset_union_left _ _⟩,
mem_map_sets_iff.2 ⟨tβ, htβ, subset_union_right _ _⟩⟩, _⟩,
rintros ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨z, ⟨⟨a, b⟩, hab, ⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨⟨a, b⟩, hab, ⟨⟩⟩,
⟨⟨_, c⟩, hbc, ⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨⟨_, c⟩, hbc, ⟨⟩⟩⟩,
{ have A : (a, c) ∈ comp_rel tα tα := ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩,
exact Htα A },
{ have A : (a, c) ∈ comp_rel tβ tβ := ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩,
exact Htβ A }
end)
/-- The union of an entourage of the diagonal in each set of a disjoint union is again an entourage of the diagonal. -/
lemma union_mem_uniformity_sum
{a : set (α × α)} (ha : a ∈ 𝓤 α) {b : set (β × β)} (hb : b ∈ 𝓤 β) :
((λ p : (α × α), (inl p.1, inl p.2)) '' a ∪ (λ p : (β × β), (inr p.1, inr p.2)) '' b) ∈ (@uniform_space.core.sum α β _ _).uniformity :=
⟨mem_map_sets_iff.2 ⟨_, ha, subset_union_left _ _⟩, mem_map_sets_iff.2 ⟨_, hb, subset_union_right _ _⟩⟩
/- To prove that the topology defined by the uniform structure on the disjoint union coincides with
the disjoint union topology, we need two lemmas saying that open sets can be characterized by
the uniform structure -/
lemma uniformity_sum_of_open_aux {s : set (α ⊕ β)} (hs : is_open s) {x : α ⊕ β} (xs : x ∈ s) :
{ p : ((α ⊕ β) × (α ⊕ β)) | p.1 = x → p.2 ∈ s } ∈ (@uniform_space.core.sum α β _ _).uniformity :=
begin
cases x,
{ refine mem_sets_of_superset
(union_mem_uniformity_sum (mem_nhds_uniformity_iff.1 (mem_nhds_sets hs.1 xs)) univ_mem_sets)
(union_subset _ _);
rintro _ ⟨⟨_, b⟩, h, ⟨⟩⟩ ⟨⟩,
exact h rfl },
{ refine mem_sets_of_superset
(union_mem_uniformity_sum univ_mem_sets (mem_nhds_uniformity_iff.1 (mem_nhds_sets hs.2 xs)))
(union_subset _ _);
rintro _ ⟨⟨a, _⟩, h, ⟨⟩⟩ ⟨⟩,
exact h rfl },
end
lemma open_of_uniformity_sum_aux {s : set (α ⊕ β)}
(hs : ∀x ∈ s, { p : ((α ⊕ β) × (α ⊕ β)) | p.1 = x → p.2 ∈ s } ∈ (@uniform_space.core.sum α β _ _).uniformity) :
is_open s :=
begin
split,
{ refine (@is_open_iff_mem_nhds α _ _).2 (λ a ha, mem_nhds_uniformity_iff.2 _),
rcases mem_map_sets_iff.1 (hs _ ha).1 with ⟨t, ht, st⟩,
refine mem_sets_of_superset ht _,
rintro p pt rfl, exact st ⟨_, pt, rfl⟩ rfl },
{ refine (@is_open_iff_mem_nhds β _ _).2 (λ b hb, mem_nhds_uniformity_iff.2 _),
rcases mem_map_sets_iff.1 (hs _ hb).2 with ⟨t, ht, st⟩,
refine mem_sets_of_superset ht _,
rintro p pt rfl, exact st ⟨_, pt, rfl⟩ rfl }
end
/- We can now define the uniform structure on the disjoint union -/
instance sum.uniform_space [u₁ : uniform_space α] [u₂ : uniform_space β] : uniform_space (α ⊕ β) :=
{ to_core := uniform_space.core.sum,
is_open_uniformity := λ s, ⟨uniformity_sum_of_open_aux, open_of_uniformity_sum_aux⟩ }
lemma sum.uniformity [uniform_space α] [uniform_space β] :
𝓤 (α ⊕ β) =
map (λ p : α × α, (inl p.1, inl p.2)) (𝓤 α) ⊔
map (λ p : β × β, (inr p.1, inr p.2)) (𝓤 β) := rfl
end sum
end constructions
lemma lebesgue_number_lemma {α : Type u} [uniform_space α] {s : set α} {ι} {c : ι → set α}
(hs : compact s) (hc₁ : ∀ i, is_open (c i)) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃ i, c i) :
∃ n ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ i, {y | (x, y) ∈ n} ⊆ c i :=
begin
let u := λ n, {x | ∃ i (m ∈ 𝓤 α), {y | (x, y) ∈ comp_rel m n} ⊆ c i},
have hu₁ : ∀ n ∈ 𝓤 α, is_open (u n),
{ refine λ n hn, is_open_uniformity.2 _,
rintro x ⟨i, m, hm, h⟩,
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets hm with ⟨m', hm', mm'⟩,
apply (𝓤 α).sets_of_superset hm',
rintros ⟨x, y⟩ hp rfl,
refine ⟨i, m', hm', λ z hz, h (monotone_comp_rel monotone_id monotone_const mm' _)⟩,
dsimp at hz ⊢, rw comp_rel_assoc,
exact ⟨y, hp, hz⟩ },
have hu₂ : s ⊆ ⋃ n ∈ 𝓤 α, u n,
{ intros x hx,
rcases mem_Union.1 (hc₂ hx) with ⟨i, h⟩,
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets (is_open_uniformity.1 (hc₁ i) x h) with ⟨m', hm', mm'⟩,
exact mem_bUnion hm' ⟨i, _, hm', λ y hy, mm' hy rfl⟩ },
rcases compact_elim_finite_subcover_image hs hu₁ hu₂ with ⟨b, bu, b_fin, b_cover⟩,
refine ⟨_, Inter_mem_sets b_fin bu, λ x hx, _⟩,
rcases mem_bUnion_iff.1 (b_cover hx) with ⟨n, bn, i, m, hm, h⟩,
refine ⟨i, λ y hy, h _⟩,
exact prod_mk_mem_comp_rel (refl_mem_uniformity hm) (bInter_subset_of_mem bn hy)
end
lemma lebesgue_number_lemma_sUnion {α : Type u} [uniform_space α] {s : set α} {c : set (set α)}
(hs : compact s) (hc₁ : ∀ t ∈ c, is_open t) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃₀ c) :
∃ n ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ c, ∀ y, (x, y) ∈ n → y ∈ t :=
by rw sUnion_eq_Union at hc₂;
simpa using lebesgue_number_lemma hs (by simpa) hc₂
|
b7a0a5d58789534482d4b296e9f6c4339d9506cc | 07c6143268cfb72beccd1cc35735d424ebcb187b | /src/data/rat/basic.lean | 29ad7db2cf8513c07aff73fb3c124e3c8c07a3f7 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | khoek/mathlib | bc49a842910af13a3c372748310e86467d1dc766 | aa55f8b50354b3e11ba64792dcb06cccb2d8ee28 | refs/heads/master | 1,588,232,063,837 | 1,587,304,803,000 | 1,587,304,803,000 | 176,688,517 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,553,070,585,000 | 1,553,070,585,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 24,803 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import
data.nat.gcd
data.pnat.basic data.int.sqrt data.equiv.encodable
algebra.group algebra.ordered_group algebra.group_power
algebra.euclidean_domain
algebra.ordered_field
tactic.norm_cast
tactic.lift
/-!
# Basics for the Rational Numbers
## Summary
We define a rational number `q` as a structure `{ num, denom, pos, cop }`, where
- `num` is the numerator of `q`,
- `denom` is the denominator of `q`,
- `pos` is a proof that `denom > 0`, and
- `cop` is a proof `num` and `denom` are coprime.
We then define the expected (discrete) field structure on `ℚ` and prove basic lemmas about it.
Moreoever, we provide the expected casts from `ℕ` and `ℤ` into `ℚ`, i.e. `(↑n : ℚ) = n / 1`.
## Main Definitions
- `rat` is the structure encoding `ℚ`.
- `rat.mk n d` constructs a rational number `q = n / d` from `n d : ℤ`.
## Notations
- `/.` is infix notation for `rat.mk`.
## Tags
rat, rationals, field, ℚ, numerator, denominator, num, denom
-/
/-- `rat`, or `ℚ`, is the type of rational numbers. It is defined
as the set of pairs ⟨n, d⟩ of integers such that `d` is positive and `n` and
`d` are coprime. This representation is preferred to the quotient
because without periodic reduction, the numerator and denominator can grow
exponentially (for example, adding 1/2 to itself repeatedly). -/
structure rat := mk' ::
(num : ℤ)
(denom : ℕ)
(pos : 0 < denom)
(cop : num.nat_abs.coprime denom)
notation `ℚ` := rat
namespace rat
protected def repr : ℚ → string
| ⟨n, d, _, _⟩ := if d = 1 then _root_.repr n else
_root_.repr n ++ "/" ++ _root_.repr d
instance : has_repr ℚ := ⟨rat.repr⟩
instance : has_to_string ℚ := ⟨rat.repr⟩
meta instance : has_to_format ℚ := ⟨coe ∘ rat.repr⟩
instance : encodable ℚ := encodable.of_equiv (Σ n : ℤ, {d : ℕ // 0 < d ∧ n.nat_abs.coprime d})
⟨λ ⟨a, b, c, d⟩, ⟨a, b, c, d⟩, λ⟨a, b, c, d⟩, ⟨a, b, c, d⟩,
λ ⟨a, b, c, d⟩, rfl, λ⟨a, b, c, d⟩, rfl⟩
/-- Embed an integer as a rational number -/
def of_int (n : ℤ) : ℚ :=
⟨n, 1, nat.one_pos, nat.coprime_one_right _⟩
instance : has_zero ℚ := ⟨of_int 0⟩
instance : has_one ℚ := ⟨of_int 1⟩
instance : inhabited ℚ := ⟨0⟩
/-- Form the quotient `n / d` where `n:ℤ` and `d:ℕ+` (not necessarily coprime) -/
def mk_pnat (n : ℤ) : ℕ+ → ℚ | ⟨d, dpos⟩ :=
let n' := n.nat_abs, g := n'.gcd d in
⟨n / g, d / g, begin
apply (nat.le_div_iff_mul_le _ _ (nat.gcd_pos_of_pos_right _ dpos)).2,
simp, exact nat.le_of_dvd dpos (nat.gcd_dvd_right _ _)
end, begin
have : int.nat_abs (n / ↑g) = n' / g,
{ cases int.nat_abs_eq n with e e; rw e, { refl },
rw [int.neg_div_of_dvd, int.nat_abs_neg], { refl },
exact int.coe_nat_dvd.2 (nat.gcd_dvd_left _ _) },
rw this,
exact nat.coprime_div_gcd_div_gcd (nat.gcd_pos_of_pos_right _ dpos)
end⟩
/-- Form the quotient `n / d` where `n:ℤ` and `d:ℕ`. In the case `d = 0`, we
define `n / 0 = 0` by convention. -/
def mk_nat (n : ℤ) (d : ℕ) : ℚ :=
if d0 : d = 0 then 0 else mk_pnat n ⟨d, nat.pos_of_ne_zero d0⟩
/-- Form the quotient `n / d` where `n d : ℤ`. -/
def mk : ℤ → ℤ → ℚ
| n (d : ℕ) := mk_nat n d
| n -[1+ d] := mk_pnat (-n) d.succ_pnat
localized "infix ` /. `:70 := rat.mk" in rat
theorem mk_pnat_eq (n d h) : mk_pnat n ⟨d, h⟩ = n /. d :=
by change n /. d with dite _ _ _; simp [ne_of_gt h]
theorem mk_nat_eq (n d) : mk_nat n d = n /. d := rfl
@[simp] theorem mk_zero (n) : n /. 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem zero_mk_pnat (n) : mk_pnat 0 n = 0 :=
by cases n; simp [mk_pnat]; change int.nat_abs 0 with 0; simp *; refl
@[simp] theorem zero_mk_nat (n) : mk_nat 0 n = 0 :=
by by_cases n = 0; simp [*, mk_nat]
@[simp] theorem zero_mk (n) : 0 /. n = 0 :=
by cases n; simp [mk]
private lemma gcd_abs_dvd_left {a b} : (nat.gcd (int.nat_abs a) b : ℤ) ∣ a :=
int.dvd_nat_abs.1 $ int.coe_nat_dvd.2 $ nat.gcd_dvd_left (int.nat_abs a) b
@[simp] theorem mk_eq_zero {a b : ℤ} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a /. b = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
begin
constructor; intro h; [skip, {subst a, simp}],
have : ∀ {a b}, mk_pnat a b = 0 → a = 0,
{ intros a b e, cases b with b h,
injection e with e,
apply int.eq_mul_of_div_eq_right gcd_abs_dvd_left e },
cases b with b; simp [mk, mk_nat] at h,
{ simp [mt (congr_arg int.of_nat) b0] at h,
exact this h },
{ apply neg_inj, simp [this h] }
end
theorem mk_eq : ∀ {a b c d : ℤ} (hb : b ≠ 0) (hd : d ≠ 0),
a /. b = c /. d ↔ a * d = c * b :=
suffices ∀ a b c d hb hd, mk_pnat a ⟨b, hb⟩ = mk_pnat c ⟨d, hd⟩ ↔ a * d = c * b,
begin
intros, cases b with b b; simp [mk, mk_nat, nat.succ_pnat],
simp [mt (congr_arg int.of_nat) hb],
all_goals {
cases d with d d; simp [mk, mk_nat, nat.succ_pnat],
simp [mt (congr_arg int.of_nat) hd],
all_goals { rw this, try {refl} } },
{ change a * ↑(d.succ) = -c * ↑b ↔ a * -(d.succ) = c * b,
constructor; intro h; apply neg_inj; simpa [left_distrib, neg_add_eq_iff_eq_add,
eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, neg_eq_iff_add_eq_zero] using h },
{ change -a * ↑d = c * b.succ ↔ a * d = c * -b.succ,
constructor; intro h; apply neg_inj; simpa [left_distrib, eq_comm] using h },
{ change -a * d.succ = -c * b.succ ↔ a * -d.succ = c * -b.succ,
simp [left_distrib, sub_eq_add_neg], cc }
end,
begin
intros, simp [mk_pnat], constructor; intro h,
{ cases h with ha hb,
have ha, {
have dv := @gcd_abs_dvd_left,
have := int.eq_mul_of_div_eq_right dv ha,
rw ← int.mul_div_assoc _ dv at this,
exact int.eq_mul_of_div_eq_left (dvd_mul_of_dvd_right dv _) this.symm },
have hb, {
have dv := λ {a b}, nat.gcd_dvd_right (int.nat_abs a) b,
have := nat.eq_mul_of_div_eq_right dv hb,
rw ← nat.mul_div_assoc _ dv at this,
exact nat.eq_mul_of_div_eq_left (dvd_mul_of_dvd_right dv _) this.symm },
have m0 : (a.nat_abs.gcd b * c.nat_abs.gcd d : ℤ) ≠ 0, {
refine int.coe_nat_ne_zero.2 (ne_of_gt _),
apply mul_pos; apply nat.gcd_pos_of_pos_right; assumption },
apply eq_of_mul_eq_mul_right m0,
simpa [mul_comm, mul_left_comm] using
congr (congr_arg (*) ha.symm) (congr_arg coe hb) },
{ suffices : ∀ a c, a * d = c * b →
a / a.gcd b = c / c.gcd d ∧ b / a.gcd b = d / c.gcd d,
{ cases this a.nat_abs c.nat_abs
(by simpa [int.nat_abs_mul] using congr_arg int.nat_abs h) with h₁ h₂,
have hs := congr_arg int.sign h,
simp [int.sign_eq_one_of_pos (int.coe_nat_lt.2 hb),
int.sign_eq_one_of_pos (int.coe_nat_lt.2 hd)] at hs,
conv in a { rw ← int.sign_mul_nat_abs a },
conv in c { rw ← int.sign_mul_nat_abs c },
rw [int.mul_div_assoc, int.mul_div_assoc],
exact ⟨congr (congr_arg (*) hs) (congr_arg coe h₁), h₂⟩,
all_goals { exact int.coe_nat_dvd.2 (nat.gcd_dvd_left _ _) } },
intros a c h,
suffices bd : b / a.gcd b = d / c.gcd d,
{ refine ⟨_, bd⟩,
apply nat.eq_of_mul_eq_mul_left hb,
rw [← nat.mul_div_assoc _ (nat.gcd_dvd_left _ _), mul_comm,
nat.mul_div_assoc _ (nat.gcd_dvd_right _ _), bd,
← nat.mul_div_assoc _ (nat.gcd_dvd_right _ _), h, mul_comm,
nat.mul_div_assoc _ (nat.gcd_dvd_left _ _)] },
suffices : ∀ {a c : ℕ} (b>0) (d>0),
a * d = c * b → b / a.gcd b ≤ d / c.gcd d,
{ exact le_antisymm (this _ hb _ hd h) (this _ hd _ hb h.symm) },
intros a c b hb d hd h,
have gb0 := nat.gcd_pos_of_pos_right a hb,
have gd0 := nat.gcd_pos_of_pos_right c hd,
apply nat.le_of_dvd,
apply (nat.le_div_iff_mul_le _ _ gd0).2,
simp, apply nat.le_of_dvd hd (nat.gcd_dvd_right _ _),
apply (nat.coprime_div_gcd_div_gcd gb0).symm.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left,
refine ⟨c / c.gcd d, _⟩,
rw [← nat.mul_div_assoc _ (nat.gcd_dvd_left _ _),
← nat.mul_div_assoc _ (nat.gcd_dvd_right _ _)],
apply congr_arg (/ c.gcd d),
rw [mul_comm, ← nat.mul_div_assoc _ (nat.gcd_dvd_left _ _),
mul_comm, h, nat.mul_div_assoc _ (nat.gcd_dvd_right _ _), mul_comm] }
end
@[simp] theorem div_mk_div_cancel_left {a b c : ℤ} (c0 : c ≠ 0) :
(a * c) /. (b * c) = a /. b :=
begin
by_cases b0 : b = 0, { subst b0, simp },
apply (mk_eq (mul_ne_zero b0 c0) b0).2, simp [mul_comm, mul_assoc]
end
@[simp] theorem num_denom : ∀ {a : ℚ}, a.num /. a.denom = a
| ⟨n, d, h, (c:_=1)⟩ := show mk_nat n d = _,
by simp [mk_nat, ne_of_gt h, mk_pnat, c]
theorem num_denom' {n d h c} : (⟨n, d, h, c⟩ : ℚ) = n /. d := num_denom.symm
theorem of_int_eq_mk (z : ℤ) : of_int z = z /. 1 := num_denom'
@[elab_as_eliminator] def {u} num_denom_cases_on {C : ℚ → Sort u}
: ∀ (a : ℚ) (H : ∀ n d, 0 < d → (int.nat_abs n).coprime d → C (n /. d)), C a
| ⟨n, d, h, c⟩ H := by rw num_denom'; exact H n d h c
@[elab_as_eliminator] def {u} num_denom_cases_on' {C : ℚ → Sort u}
(a : ℚ) (H : ∀ (n:ℤ) (d:ℕ), d ≠ 0 → C (n /. d)) : C a :=
num_denom_cases_on a $ λ n d h c,
H n d $ ne_of_gt h
theorem num_dvd (a) {b : ℤ} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : (a /. b).num ∣ a :=
begin
cases e : a /. b with n d h c,
rw [rat.num_denom', rat.mk_eq b0
(ne_of_gt (int.coe_nat_pos.2 h))] at e,
refine (int.nat_abs_dvd.1 $ int.dvd_nat_abs.1 $ int.coe_nat_dvd.2 $
c.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right _),
have := congr_arg int.nat_abs e,
simp [int.nat_abs_mul, int.nat_abs_of_nat] at this, simp [this]
end
theorem denom_dvd (a b : ℤ) : ((a /. b).denom : ℤ) ∣ b :=
begin
by_cases b0 : b = 0, {simp [b0]},
cases e : a /. b with n d h c,
rw [num_denom', mk_eq b0 (ne_of_gt (int.coe_nat_pos.2 h))] at e,
refine (int.dvd_nat_abs.1 $ int.coe_nat_dvd.2 $ c.symm.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left _),
rw [← int.nat_abs_mul, ← int.coe_nat_dvd, int.dvd_nat_abs, ← e], simp
end
protected def add : ℚ → ℚ → ℚ
| ⟨n₁, d₁, h₁, c₁⟩ ⟨n₂, d₂, h₂, c₂⟩ := mk_pnat (n₁ * d₂ + n₂ * d₁) ⟨d₁ * d₂, mul_pos h₁ h₂⟩
instance : has_add ℚ := ⟨rat.add⟩
theorem lift_binop_eq (f : ℚ → ℚ → ℚ) (f₁ : ℤ → ℤ → ℤ → ℤ → ℤ) (f₂ : ℤ → ℤ → ℤ → ℤ → ℤ)
(fv : ∀ {n₁ d₁ h₁ c₁ n₂ d₂ h₂ c₂},
f ⟨n₁, d₁, h₁, c₁⟩ ⟨n₂, d₂, h₂, c₂⟩ = f₁ n₁ d₁ n₂ d₂ /. f₂ n₁ d₁ n₂ d₂)
(f0 : ∀ {n₁ d₁ n₂ d₂} (d₁0 : d₁ ≠ 0) (d₂0 : d₂ ≠ 0), f₂ n₁ d₁ n₂ d₂ ≠ 0)
(a b c d : ℤ) (b0 : b ≠ 0) (d0 : d ≠ 0)
(H : ∀ {n₁ d₁ n₂ d₂} (h₁ : a * d₁ = n₁ * b) (h₂ : c * d₂ = n₂ * d),
f₁ n₁ d₁ n₂ d₂ * f₂ a b c d = f₁ a b c d * f₂ n₁ d₁ n₂ d₂) :
f (a /. b) (c /. d) = f₁ a b c d /. f₂ a b c d :=
begin
generalize ha : a /. b = x, cases x with n₁ d₁ h₁ c₁, rw num_denom' at ha,
generalize hc : c /. d = x, cases x with n₂ d₂ h₂ c₂, rw num_denom' at hc,
rw fv,
have d₁0 := ne_of_gt (int.coe_nat_lt.2 h₁),
have d₂0 := ne_of_gt (int.coe_nat_lt.2 h₂),
exact (mk_eq (f0 d₁0 d₂0) (f0 b0 d0)).2 (H ((mk_eq b0 d₁0).1 ha) ((mk_eq d0 d₂0).1 hc))
end
@[simp] theorem add_def {a b c d : ℤ} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (d0 : d ≠ 0) :
a /. b + c /. d = (a * d + c * b) /. (b * d) :=
begin
apply lift_binop_eq rat.add; intros; try {assumption},
{ apply mk_pnat_eq },
{ apply mul_ne_zero d₁0 d₂0 },
calc (n₁ * d₂ + n₂ * d₁) * (b * d) =
(n₁ * b) * d₂ * d + (n₂ * d) * (d₁ * b) : by simp [mul_add, mul_comm, mul_left_comm]
... = (a * d₁) * d₂ * d + (c * d₂) * (d₁ * b) : by rw [h₁, h₂]
... = (a * d + c * b) * (d₁ * d₂) : by simp [mul_add, mul_comm, mul_left_comm]
end
protected def neg : ℚ → ℚ
| ⟨n, d, h, c⟩ := ⟨-n, d, h, by simp [c]⟩
instance : has_neg ℚ := ⟨rat.neg⟩
@[simp] theorem neg_def {a b : ℤ} : -(a /. b) = -a /. b :=
begin
by_cases b0 : b = 0, { subst b0, simp, refl },
generalize ha : a /. b = x, cases x with n₁ d₁ h₁ c₁, rw num_denom' at ha,
show rat.mk' _ _ _ _ = _, rw num_denom',
have d0 := ne_of_gt (int.coe_nat_lt.2 h₁),
apply (mk_eq d0 b0).2, have h₁ := (mk_eq b0 d0).1 ha,
simp only [neg_mul_eq_neg_mul_symm, congr_arg has_neg.neg h₁]
end
protected def mul : ℚ → ℚ → ℚ
| ⟨n₁, d₁, h₁, c₁⟩ ⟨n₂, d₂, h₂, c₂⟩ := mk_pnat (n₁ * n₂) ⟨d₁ * d₂, mul_pos h₁ h₂⟩
instance : has_mul ℚ := ⟨rat.mul⟩
@[simp] theorem mul_def {a b c d : ℤ} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (d0 : d ≠ 0) :
(a /. b) * (c /. d) = (a * c) /. (b * d) :=
begin
apply lift_binop_eq rat.mul; intros; try {assumption},
{ apply mk_pnat_eq },
{ apply mul_ne_zero d₁0 d₂0 },
cc
end
protected def inv : ℚ → ℚ
| ⟨(n+1:ℕ), d, h, c⟩ := ⟨d, n+1, n.succ_pos, c.symm⟩
| ⟨0, d, h, c⟩ := 0
| ⟨-[1+ n], d, h, c⟩ := ⟨-d, n+1, n.succ_pos, nat.coprime.symm $ by simp; exact c⟩
instance : has_inv ℚ := ⟨rat.inv⟩
@[simp] theorem inv_def {a b : ℤ} : (a /. b)⁻¹ = b /. a :=
begin
by_cases a0 : a = 0, { subst a0, simp, refl },
by_cases b0 : b = 0, { subst b0, simp, refl },
generalize ha : a /. b = x, cases x with n d h c, rw num_denom' at ha,
refine eq.trans (_ : rat.inv ⟨n, d, h, c⟩ = d /. n) _,
{ cases n with n; [cases n with n, skip],
{ refl },
{ change int.of_nat n.succ with (n+1:ℕ),
unfold rat.inv, rw num_denom' },
{ unfold rat.inv, rw num_denom', refl } },
have n0 : n ≠ 0,
{ refine mt (λ (n0 : n = 0), _) a0,
subst n0, simp at ha,
exact (mk_eq_zero b0).1 ha },
have d0 := ne_of_gt (int.coe_nat_lt.2 h),
have ha := (mk_eq b0 d0).1 ha,
apply (mk_eq n0 a0).2,
cc
end
variables (a b c : ℚ)
protected theorem add_zero : a + 0 = a :=
num_denom_cases_on' a $ λ n d h,
by rw [← zero_mk d]; simp [h, -zero_mk]
protected theorem zero_add : 0 + a = a :=
num_denom_cases_on' a $ λ n d h,
by rw [← zero_mk d]; simp [h, -zero_mk]
protected theorem add_comm : a + b = b + a :=
num_denom_cases_on' a $ λ n₁ d₁ h₁,
num_denom_cases_on' b $ λ n₂ d₂ h₂,
by simp [h₁, h₂]; cc
protected theorem add_assoc : a + b + c = a + (b + c) :=
num_denom_cases_on' a $ λ n₁ d₁ h₁,
num_denom_cases_on' b $ λ n₂ d₂ h₂,
num_denom_cases_on' c $ λ n₃ d₃ h₃,
by simp [h₁, h₂, h₃, mul_ne_zero, mul_add, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, add_left_comm]
protected theorem add_left_neg : -a + a = 0 :=
num_denom_cases_on' a $ λ n d h,
by simp [h]
protected theorem mul_one : a * 1 = a :=
num_denom_cases_on' a $ λ n d h,
by change (1:ℚ) with 1 /. 1; simp [h]
protected theorem one_mul : 1 * a = a :=
num_denom_cases_on' a $ λ n d h,
by change (1:ℚ) with 1 /. 1; simp [h]
protected theorem mul_comm : a * b = b * a :=
num_denom_cases_on' a $ λ n₁ d₁ h₁,
num_denom_cases_on' b $ λ n₂ d₂ h₂,
by simp [h₁, h₂, mul_comm]
protected theorem mul_assoc : a * b * c = a * (b * c) :=
num_denom_cases_on' a $ λ n₁ d₁ h₁,
num_denom_cases_on' b $ λ n₂ d₂ h₂,
num_denom_cases_on' c $ λ n₃ d₃ h₃,
by simp [h₁, h₂, h₃, mul_ne_zero, mul_comm, mul_left_comm]
protected theorem add_mul : (a + b) * c = a * c + b * c :=
num_denom_cases_on' a $ λ n₁ d₁ h₁,
num_denom_cases_on' b $ λ n₂ d₂ h₂,
num_denom_cases_on' c $ λ n₃ d₃ h₃,
by simp [h₁, h₂, h₃, mul_ne_zero];
refine (div_mk_div_cancel_left (int.coe_nat_ne_zero.2 h₃)).symm.trans _;
simp [mul_add, mul_comm, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]
protected theorem mul_add : a * (b + c) = a * b + a * c :=
by rw [rat.mul_comm, rat.add_mul, rat.mul_comm, rat.mul_comm c a]
protected theorem zero_ne_one : 0 ≠ (1:ℚ) :=
mt (λ (h : 0 = 1 /. 1), (mk_eq_zero one_ne_zero).1 h.symm) one_ne_zero
protected theorem mul_inv_cancel : a ≠ 0 → a * a⁻¹ = 1 :=
num_denom_cases_on' a $ λ n d h a0,
have n0 : n ≠ 0, from mt (by intro e; subst e; simp) a0,
by simp [h, n0, mul_comm]; exact
eq.trans (by simp) (@div_mk_div_cancel_left 1 1 _ n0)
protected theorem inv_mul_cancel (h : a ≠ 0) : a⁻¹ * a = 1 :=
eq.trans (rat.mul_comm _ _) (rat.mul_inv_cancel _ h)
instance : decidable_eq ℚ := by tactic.mk_dec_eq_instance
instance : field ℚ :=
{ zero := 0,
add := rat.add,
neg := rat.neg,
one := 1,
mul := rat.mul,
inv := rat.inv,
zero_add := rat.zero_add,
add_zero := rat.add_zero,
add_comm := rat.add_comm,
add_assoc := rat.add_assoc,
add_left_neg := rat.add_left_neg,
mul_one := rat.mul_one,
one_mul := rat.one_mul,
mul_comm := rat.mul_comm,
mul_assoc := rat.mul_assoc,
left_distrib := rat.mul_add,
right_distrib := rat.add_mul,
zero_ne_one := rat.zero_ne_one,
mul_inv_cancel := rat.mul_inv_cancel,
inv_zero := rfl }
/- Extra instances to short-circuit type class resolution -/
instance : division_ring ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : integral_domain ℚ := by apply_instance
-- TODO(Mario): this instance slows down data.real.basic
--instance : domain ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : nonzero_comm_ring ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : comm_ring ℚ := by apply_instance
--instance : ring ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : comm_semiring ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : semiring ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : add_comm_group ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : add_group ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : add_comm_monoid ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : add_monoid ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : add_left_cancel_semigroup ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : add_right_cancel_semigroup ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : add_comm_semigroup ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : add_semigroup ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : comm_monoid ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : monoid ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : comm_semigroup ℚ := by apply_instance
instance : semigroup ℚ := by apply_instance
theorem sub_def {a b c d : ℤ} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (d0 : d ≠ 0) :
a /. b - c /. d = (a * d - c * b) /. (b * d) :=
by simp [b0, d0, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp] lemma denom_neg_eq_denom : ∀ q : ℚ, (-q).denom = q.denom
| ⟨_, d, _, _⟩ := rfl
@[simp] lemma num_neg_eq_neg_num : ∀ q : ℚ, (-q).num = -(q.num)
| ⟨n, _, _, _⟩ := rfl
@[simp] lemma num_zero : rat.num 0 = 0 := rfl
lemma zero_of_num_zero {q : ℚ} (hq : q.num = 0) : q = 0 :=
have q = q.num /. q.denom, from num_denom.symm,
by simpa [hq]
lemma zero_iff_num_zero {q : ℚ} : q = 0 ↔ q.num = 0 :=
⟨λ _, by simp *, zero_of_num_zero⟩
lemma num_ne_zero_of_ne_zero {q : ℚ} (h : q ≠ 0) : q.num ≠ 0 :=
assume : q.num = 0,
h $ zero_of_num_zero this
@[simp] lemma num_one : (1 : ℚ).num = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma denom_one : (1 : ℚ).denom = 1 := rfl
lemma denom_ne_zero (q : ℚ) : q.denom ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt q.pos
lemma eq_iff_mul_eq_mul {p q : ℚ} : p = q ↔ p.num * q.denom = q.num * p.denom :=
begin
conv_lhs { rw [←(@num_denom p), ←(@num_denom q)] },
apply rat.mk_eq,
{ exact_mod_cast p.denom_ne_zero },
{ exact_mod_cast q.denom_ne_zero }
end
lemma mk_num_ne_zero_of_ne_zero {q : ℚ} {n d : ℤ} (hq : q ≠ 0) (hqnd : q = n /. d) : n ≠ 0 :=
assume : n = 0,
hq $ by simpa [this] using hqnd
lemma mk_denom_ne_zero_of_ne_zero {q : ℚ} {n d : ℤ} (hq : q ≠ 0) (hqnd : q = n /. d) : d ≠ 0 :=
assume : d = 0,
hq $ by simpa [this] using hqnd
lemma mk_ne_zero_of_ne_zero {n d : ℤ} (h : n ≠ 0) (hd : d ≠ 0) : n /. d ≠ 0 :=
assume : n /. d = 0,
h $ (mk_eq_zero hd).1 this
lemma mul_num_denom (q r : ℚ) : q * r = (q.num * r.num) /. ↑(q.denom * r.denom) :=
have hq' : (↑q.denom : ℤ) ≠ 0, by have := denom_ne_zero q; simpa,
have hr' : (↑r.denom : ℤ) ≠ 0, by have := denom_ne_zero r; simpa,
suffices (q.num /. ↑q.denom) * (r.num /. ↑r.denom) = (q.num * r.num) /. ↑(q.denom * r.denom),
by simpa using this,
by simp [mul_def hq' hr', -num_denom]
lemma div_num_denom (q r : ℚ) : q / r = (q.num * r.denom) /. (q.denom * r.num) :=
if hr : r.num = 0 then
have hr' : r = 0, from zero_of_num_zero hr,
by simp *
else calc q / r = q * r⁻¹ : div_eq_mul_inv
... = (q.num /. q.denom) * (r.num /. r.denom)⁻¹ : by simp
... = (q.num /. q.denom) * (r.denom /. r.num) : by rw inv_def
... = (q.num * r.denom) /. (q.denom * r.num) : mul_def (by simpa using denom_ne_zero q) hr
lemma num_denom_mk {q : ℚ} {n d : ℤ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hd : d ≠ 0) (qdf : q = n /. d) :
∃ c : ℤ, n = c * q.num ∧ d = c * q.denom :=
have hq : q ≠ 0, from
assume : q = 0,
hn $ (rat.mk_eq_zero hd).1 (by cc),
have q.num /. q.denom = n /. d, by rwa [num_denom],
have q.num * d = n * ↑(q.denom), from (rat.mk_eq (by simp [rat.denom_ne_zero]) hd).1 this,
begin
existsi n / q.num,
have hqdn : q.num ∣ n, begin rw qdf, apply rat.num_dvd, assumption end,
split,
{ rw int.div_mul_cancel hqdn },
{ apply int.eq_mul_div_of_mul_eq_mul_of_dvd_left,
{ apply rat.num_ne_zero_of_ne_zero hq },
repeat { assumption } }
end
theorem mk_pnat_num (n : ℤ) (d : ℕ+) :
(mk_pnat n d).num = n / nat.gcd n.nat_abs d :=
by cases d; refl
theorem mk_pnat_denom (n : ℤ) (d : ℕ+) :
(mk_pnat n d).denom = d / nat.gcd n.nat_abs d :=
by cases d; refl
theorem mul_num (q₁ q₂ : ℚ) : (q₁ * q₂).num =
(q₁.num * q₂.num) / nat.gcd (q₁.num * q₂.num).nat_abs (q₁.denom * q₂.denom) :=
by cases q₁; cases q₂; refl
theorem mul_denom (q₁ q₂ : ℚ) : (q₁ * q₂).denom =
(q₁.denom * q₂.denom) / nat.gcd (q₁.num * q₂.num).nat_abs (q₁.denom * q₂.denom) :=
by cases q₁; cases q₂; refl
theorem mul_self_num (q : ℚ) : (q * q).num = q.num * q.num :=
by rw [mul_num, int.nat_abs_mul, nat.coprime.gcd_eq_one, int.coe_nat_one, int.div_one];
exact (q.cop.mul_right q.cop).mul (q.cop.mul_right q.cop)
theorem mul_self_denom (q : ℚ) : (q * q).denom = q.denom * q.denom :=
by rw [rat.mul_denom, int.nat_abs_mul, nat.coprime.gcd_eq_one, nat.div_one];
exact (q.cop.mul_right q.cop).mul (q.cop.mul_right q.cop)
lemma add_num_denom (q r : ℚ) : q + r =
((q.num * r.denom + q.denom * r.num : ℤ)) /. (↑q.denom * ↑r.denom : ℤ) :=
have hqd : (q.denom : ℤ) ≠ 0, from int.coe_nat_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 q.3,
have hrd : (r.denom : ℤ) ≠ 0, from int.coe_nat_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 r.3,
by conv_lhs { rw [←@num_denom q, ←@num_denom r, rat.add_def hqd hrd] };
simp [mul_comm]
section casts
theorem coe_int_eq_mk : ∀ (z : ℤ), ↑z = z /. 1
| (n : ℕ) := show (n:ℚ) = n /. 1,
by induction n with n IH n; simp [*, show (1:ℚ) = 1 /. 1, from rfl]
| -[1+ n] := show (-(n + 1) : ℚ) = -[1+ n] /. 1, begin
induction n with n IH, {refl},
show -(n + 1 + 1 : ℚ) = -[1+ n.succ] /. 1,
rw [neg_add, IH],
simpa [show -1 = (-1) /. 1, from rfl]
end
theorem mk_eq_div (n d : ℤ) : n /. d = ((n : ℚ) / d) :=
begin
by_cases d0 : d = 0, {simp [d0, div_zero]},
simp [division_def, coe_int_eq_mk, mul_def one_ne_zero d0]
end
theorem coe_int_eq_of_int (z : ℤ) : ↑z = of_int z :=
(coe_int_eq_mk z).trans (of_int_eq_mk z).symm
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_int_num (n : ℤ) : (n : ℚ).num = n :=
by rw coe_int_eq_of_int; refl
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_int_denom (n : ℤ) : (n : ℚ).denom = 1 :=
by rw coe_int_eq_of_int; refl
lemma coe_int_num_of_denom_eq_one {q : ℚ} (hq : q.denom = 1) : ↑(q.num) = q :=
by { conv_rhs { rw [←(@num_denom q), hq] }, rw [coe_int_eq_mk], refl }
instance : can_lift ℚ ℤ :=
⟨coe, λ q, q.denom = 1, λ q hq, ⟨q.num, coe_int_num_of_denom_eq_one hq⟩⟩
theorem coe_nat_eq_mk (n : ℕ) : ↑n = n /. 1 :=
by rw [← int.cast_coe_nat, coe_int_eq_mk]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_nat_num (n : ℕ) : (n : ℚ).num = n :=
by rw [← int.cast_coe_nat, coe_int_num]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_nat_denom (n : ℕ) : (n : ℚ).denom = 1 :=
by rw [← int.cast_coe_nat, coe_int_denom]
end casts
lemma inv_def' {q : ℚ} : q⁻¹ = (q.denom : ℚ) / q.num :=
by { conv_lhs { rw ←(@num_denom q) }, cases q, simp [div_num_denom] }
@[simp] lemma mul_own_denom_eq_num {q : ℚ} : q * q.denom = q.num :=
begin
suffices : mk (q.num) ↑(q.denom) * mk ↑(q.denom) 1 = mk (q.num) 1, by
{ conv { for q [1] { rw ←(@num_denom q) }}, rwa [coe_int_eq_mk, coe_nat_eq_mk] },
have : (q.denom : ℤ) ≠ 0, from ne_of_gt (by exact_mod_cast q.pos),
rw [(rat.mul_def this one_ne_zero), (mul_comm (q.denom : ℤ) 1), (div_mk_div_cancel_left this)]
end
end rat
|
15858b6b77408296cecd891d8424820975153e8a | 3dd1b66af77106badae6edb1c4dea91a146ead30 | /tests/lean/run/e1.lean | a3496d42b2ef33a8522965b6475516c478910117 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | silky/lean | 79c20c15c93feef47bb659a2cc139b26f3614642 | df8b88dca2f8da1a422cb618cd476ef5be730546 | refs/heads/master | 1,610,737,587,697 | 1,406,574,534,000 | 1,406,574,534,000 | 22,362,176 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 329 | lean | definition Prop [inline] : Type.{1} := Type.{0}
variable eq : forall {A : Type}, A → A → Prop
variable N : Type.{1}
variables a b c : N
infix `=`:50 := eq
check a = b
variable f : Prop → N → N
variable g : N → N → N
precedence `+`:50
infixl + := f
infixl + := g
check a + b + c
variable p : Prop
check p + a + b + c
|
2cc44338acbcf134cb009d2d5eaadb659584ec16 | 69d4931b605e11ca61881fc4f66db50a0a875e39 | /src/linear_algebra/affine_space/affine_subspace.lean | 9f7268b4262b269a1f0ed1cc2f851e8d10598f13 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | abentkamp/mathlib | d9a75d291ec09f4637b0f30cc3880ffb07549ee5 | 5360e476391508e092b5a1e5210bd0ed22dc0755 | refs/heads/master | 1,682,382,954,948 | 1,622,106,077,000 | 1,622,106,077,000 | 149,285,665 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 45,070 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import linear_algebra.affine_space.basic
import linear_algebra.tensor_product
import data.set.intervals.unordered_interval
/-!
# Affine spaces
This file defines affine subspaces (over modules) and the affine span of a set of points.
## Main definitions
* `affine_subspace k P` is the type of affine subspaces. Unlike
affine spaces, affine subspaces are allowed to be empty, and lemmas
that do not apply to empty affine subspaces have `nonempty`
hypotheses. There is a `complete_lattice` structure on affine
subspaces.
* `affine_subspace.direction` gives the `submodule` spanned by the
pairwise differences of points in an `affine_subspace`. There are
various lemmas relating to the set of vectors in the `direction`,
and relating the lattice structure on affine subspaces to that on
their directions.
* `affine_span` gives the affine subspace spanned by a set of points,
with `vector_span` giving its direction. `affine_span` is defined
in terms of `span_points`, which gives an explicit description of
the points contained in the affine span; `span_points` itself should
generally only be used when that description is required, with
`affine_span` being the main definition for other purposes. Two
other descriptions of the affine span are proved equivalent: it is
the `Inf` of affine subspaces containing the points, and (if
`[nontrivial k]`) it contains exactly those points that are affine
combinations of points in the given set.
## Implementation notes
`out_param` is used in the definiton of `add_torsor V P` to make `V` an implicit argument (deduced
from `P`) in most cases; `include V` is needed in many cases for `V`, and type classes using it, to
be added as implicit arguments to individual lemmas. As for modules, `k` is an explicit argument
rather than implied by `P` or `V`.
This file only provides purely algebraic definitions and results.
Those depending on analysis or topology are defined elsewhere; see
`analysis.normed_space.add_torsor` and `topology.algebra.affine`.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affine_space
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principal_homogeneous_space
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale big_operators classical affine
open set
section
variables (k : Type*) {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [ring k] [add_comm_group V] [module k V]
variables [affine_space V P]
include V
/-- The submodule spanning the differences of a (possibly empty) set
of points. -/
def vector_span (s : set P) : submodule k V := submodule.span k (s -ᵥ s)
/-- The definition of `vector_span`, for rewriting. -/
lemma vector_span_def (s : set P) : vector_span k s = submodule.span k (s -ᵥ s) :=
rfl
/-- `vector_span` is monotone. -/
lemma vector_span_mono {s₁ s₂ : set P} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : vector_span k s₁ ≤ vector_span k s₂ :=
submodule.span_mono (vsub_self_mono h)
variables (P)
/-- The `vector_span` of the empty set is `⊥`. -/
@[simp] lemma vector_span_empty : vector_span k (∅ : set P) = (⊥ : submodule k V) :=
by rw [vector_span_def, vsub_empty, submodule.span_empty]
variables {P}
/-- The `vector_span` of a single point is `⊥`. -/
@[simp] lemma vector_span_singleton (p : P) : vector_span k ({p} : set P) = ⊥ :=
by simp [vector_span_def]
/-- The `s -ᵥ s` lies within the `vector_span k s`. -/
lemma vsub_set_subset_vector_span (s : set P) : s -ᵥ s ⊆ ↑(vector_span k s) :=
submodule.subset_span
/-- Each pairwise difference is in the `vector_span`. -/
lemma vsub_mem_vector_span {s : set P} {p1 p2 : P} (hp1 : p1 ∈ s) (hp2 : p2 ∈ s) :
p1 -ᵥ p2 ∈ vector_span k s :=
vsub_set_subset_vector_span k s (vsub_mem_vsub hp1 hp2)
/-- The points in the affine span of a (possibly empty) set of
points. Use `affine_span` instead to get an `affine_subspace k P`. -/
def span_points (s : set P) : set P :=
{p | ∃ p1 ∈ s, ∃ v ∈ (vector_span k s), p = v +ᵥ p1}
/-- A point in a set is in its affine span. -/
lemma mem_span_points (p : P) (s : set P) : p ∈ s → p ∈ span_points k s
| hp := ⟨p, hp, 0, submodule.zero_mem _, (zero_vadd V p).symm⟩
/-- A set is contained in its `span_points`. -/
lemma subset_span_points (s : set P) : s ⊆ span_points k s :=
λ p, mem_span_points k p s
/-- The `span_points` of a set is nonempty if and only if that set
is. -/
@[simp] lemma span_points_nonempty (s : set P) :
(span_points k s).nonempty ↔ s.nonempty :=
begin
split,
{ contrapose,
rw [set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty],
intro h,
simp [h, span_points] },
{ exact λ h, h.mono (subset_span_points _ _) }
end
/-- Adding a point in the affine span and a vector in the spanning
submodule produces a point in the affine span. -/
lemma vadd_mem_span_points_of_mem_span_points_of_mem_vector_span {s : set P} {p : P} {v : V}
(hp : p ∈ span_points k s) (hv : v ∈ vector_span k s) : v +ᵥ p ∈ span_points k s :=
begin
rcases hp with ⟨p2, ⟨hp2, ⟨v2, ⟨hv2, hv2p⟩⟩⟩⟩,
rw [hv2p, vadd_vadd],
use [p2, hp2, v + v2, (vector_span k s).add_mem hv hv2, rfl]
end
/-- Subtracting two points in the affine span produces a vector in the
spanning submodule. -/
lemma vsub_mem_vector_span_of_mem_span_points_of_mem_span_points {s : set P} {p1 p2 : P}
(hp1 : p1 ∈ span_points k s) (hp2 : p2 ∈ span_points k s) :
p1 -ᵥ p2 ∈ vector_span k s :=
begin
rcases hp1 with ⟨p1a, ⟨hp1a, ⟨v1, ⟨hv1, hv1p⟩⟩⟩⟩,
rcases hp2 with ⟨p2a, ⟨hp2a, ⟨v2, ⟨hv2, hv2p⟩⟩⟩⟩,
rw [hv1p, hv2p, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub (v1 +ᵥ p1a), vadd_vsub_assoc, add_comm, add_sub_assoc],
have hv1v2 : v1 - v2 ∈ vector_span k s,
{ rw sub_eq_add_neg,
apply (vector_span k s).add_mem hv1,
rw ←neg_one_smul k v2,
exact (vector_span k s).smul_mem (-1 : k) hv2 },
refine (vector_span k s).add_mem _ hv1v2,
exact vsub_mem_vector_span k hp1a hp2a
end
end
/-- An `affine_subspace k P` is a subset of an `affine_space V P`
that, if not empty, has an affine space structure induced by a
corresponding subspace of the `module k V`. -/
structure affine_subspace (k : Type*) {V : Type*} (P : Type*) [ring k] [add_comm_group V]
[module k V] [affine_space V P] :=
(carrier : set P)
(smul_vsub_vadd_mem : ∀ (c : k) {p1 p2 p3 : P}, p1 ∈ carrier → p2 ∈ carrier → p3 ∈ carrier →
c • (p1 -ᵥ p2 : V) +ᵥ p3 ∈ carrier)
namespace submodule
variables {k V : Type*} [ring k] [add_comm_group V] [module k V]
/-- Reinterpret `p : submodule k V` as an `affine_subspace k V`. -/
def to_affine_subspace (p : submodule k V) : affine_subspace k V :=
{ carrier := p,
smul_vsub_vadd_mem := λ c p₁ p₂ p₃ h₁ h₂ h₃, p.add_mem (p.smul_mem _ (p.sub_mem h₁ h₂)) h₃ }
end submodule
namespace affine_subspace
variables (k : Type*) {V : Type*} (P : Type*) [ring k] [add_comm_group V] [module k V]
[affine_space V P]
include V
instance : has_coe (affine_subspace k P) (set P) := ⟨carrier⟩
instance : has_mem P (affine_subspace k P) := ⟨λ p s, p ∈ (s : set P)⟩
/-- A point is in an affine subspace coerced to a set if and only if
it is in that affine subspace. -/
@[simp] lemma mem_coe (p : P) (s : affine_subspace k P) :
p ∈ (s : set P) ↔ p ∈ s :=
iff.rfl
variables {k P}
/-- The direction of an affine subspace is the submodule spanned by
the pairwise differences of points. (Except in the case of an empty
affine subspace, where the direction is the zero submodule, every
vector in the direction is the difference of two points in the affine
subspace.) -/
def direction (s : affine_subspace k P) : submodule k V := vector_span k (s : set P)
/-- The direction equals the `vector_span`. -/
lemma direction_eq_vector_span (s : affine_subspace k P) :
s.direction = vector_span k (s : set P) :=
rfl
/-- Alternative definition of the direction when the affine subspace
is nonempty. This is defined so that the order on submodules (as used
in the definition of `submodule.span`) can be used in the proof of
`coe_direction_eq_vsub_set`, and is not intended to be used beyond
that proof. -/
def direction_of_nonempty {s : affine_subspace k P} (h : (s : set P).nonempty) :
submodule k V :=
{ carrier := (s : set P) -ᵥ s,
zero_mem' := begin
cases h with p hp,
exact (vsub_self p) ▸ vsub_mem_vsub hp hp
end,
add_mem' := begin
intros a b ha hb,
rcases ha with ⟨p1, p2, hp1, hp2, rfl⟩,
rcases hb with ⟨p3, p4, hp3, hp4, rfl⟩,
rw [←vadd_vsub_assoc],
refine vsub_mem_vsub _ hp4,
convert s.smul_vsub_vadd_mem 1 hp1 hp2 hp3,
rw one_smul
end,
smul_mem' := begin
intros c v hv,
rcases hv with ⟨p1, p2, hp1, hp2, rfl⟩,
rw [←vadd_vsub (c • (p1 -ᵥ p2)) p2],
refine vsub_mem_vsub _ hp2,
exact s.smul_vsub_vadd_mem c hp1 hp2 hp2
end }
/-- `direction_of_nonempty` gives the same submodule as
`direction`. -/
lemma direction_of_nonempty_eq_direction {s : affine_subspace k P} (h : (s : set P).nonempty) :
direction_of_nonempty h = s.direction :=
le_antisymm (vsub_set_subset_vector_span k s) (submodule.span_le.2 set.subset.rfl)
/-- The set of vectors in the direction of a nonempty affine subspace
is given by `vsub_set`. -/
lemma coe_direction_eq_vsub_set {s : affine_subspace k P} (h : (s : set P).nonempty) :
(s.direction : set V) = (s : set P) -ᵥ s :=
direction_of_nonempty_eq_direction h ▸ rfl
/-- A vector is in the direction of a nonempty affine subspace if and
only if it is the subtraction of two vectors in the subspace. -/
lemma mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub {s : affine_subspace k P} (h : (s : set P).nonempty) (v : V) :
v ∈ s.direction ↔ ∃ p1 ∈ s, ∃ p2 ∈ s, v = p1 -ᵥ p2 :=
begin
rw [←set_like.mem_coe, coe_direction_eq_vsub_set h],
exact ⟨λ ⟨p1, p2, hp1, hp2, hv⟩, ⟨p1, hp1, p2, hp2, hv.symm⟩,
λ ⟨p1, hp1, p2, hp2, hv⟩, ⟨p1, p2, hp1, hp2, hv.symm⟩⟩
end
/-- Adding a vector in the direction to a point in the subspace
produces a point in the subspace. -/
lemma vadd_mem_of_mem_direction {s : affine_subspace k P} {v : V} (hv : v ∈ s.direction) {p : P}
(hp : p ∈ s) : v +ᵥ p ∈ s :=
begin
rw mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub ⟨p, hp⟩ at hv,
rcases hv with ⟨p1, hp1, p2, hp2, hv⟩,
rw hv,
convert s.smul_vsub_vadd_mem 1 hp1 hp2 hp,
rw one_smul
end
/-- Subtracting two points in the subspace produces a vector in the
direction. -/
lemma vsub_mem_direction {s : affine_subspace k P} {p1 p2 : P} (hp1 : p1 ∈ s) (hp2 : p2 ∈ s) :
(p1 -ᵥ p2) ∈ s.direction :=
vsub_mem_vector_span k hp1 hp2
/-- Adding a vector to a point in a subspace produces a point in the
subspace if and only if the vector is in the direction. -/
lemma vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction {s : affine_subspace k P} (v : V) {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) :
v +ᵥ p ∈ s ↔ v ∈ s.direction :=
⟨λ h, by simpa using vsub_mem_direction h hp, λ h, vadd_mem_of_mem_direction h hp⟩
/-- Given a point in an affine subspace, the set of vectors in its
direction equals the set of vectors subtracting that point on the
right. -/
lemma coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_right {s : affine_subspace k P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) :
(s.direction : set V) = (-ᵥ p) '' s :=
begin
rw coe_direction_eq_vsub_set ⟨p, hp⟩,
refine le_antisymm _ _,
{ rintros v ⟨p1, p2, hp1, hp2, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨p1 -ᵥ p2 +ᵥ p,
vadd_mem_of_mem_direction (vsub_mem_direction hp1 hp2) hp,
(vadd_vsub _ _)⟩ },
{ rintros v ⟨p2, hp2, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨p2, p, hp2, hp, rfl⟩ }
end
/-- Given a point in an affine subspace, the set of vectors in its
direction equals the set of vectors subtracting that point on the
left. -/
lemma coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_left {s : affine_subspace k P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) :
(s.direction : set V) = (-ᵥ) p '' s :=
begin
ext v,
rw [set_like.mem_coe, ←submodule.neg_mem_iff, ←set_like.mem_coe,
coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_right hp, set.mem_image_iff_bex, set.mem_image_iff_bex],
conv_lhs { congr, funext, rw [←neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_inj] }
end
/-- Given a point in an affine subspace, a vector is in its direction
if and only if it results from subtracting that point on the right. -/
lemma mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub_right {s : affine_subspace k P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) (v : V) :
v ∈ s.direction ↔ ∃ p2 ∈ s, v = p2 -ᵥ p :=
begin
rw [←set_like.mem_coe, coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_right hp],
exact ⟨λ ⟨p2, hp2, hv⟩, ⟨p2, hp2, hv.symm⟩, λ ⟨p2, hp2, hv⟩, ⟨p2, hp2, hv.symm⟩⟩
end
/-- Given a point in an affine subspace, a vector is in its direction
if and only if it results from subtracting that point on the left. -/
lemma mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub_left {s : affine_subspace k P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) (v : V) :
v ∈ s.direction ↔ ∃ p2 ∈ s, v = p -ᵥ p2 :=
begin
rw [←set_like.mem_coe, coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_left hp],
exact ⟨λ ⟨p2, hp2, hv⟩, ⟨p2, hp2, hv.symm⟩, λ ⟨p2, hp2, hv⟩, ⟨p2, hp2, hv.symm⟩⟩
end
/-- Given a point in an affine subspace, a result of subtracting that
point on the right is in the direction if and only if the other point
is in the subspace. -/
lemma vsub_right_mem_direction_iff_mem {s : affine_subspace k P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) (p2 : P) :
p2 -ᵥ p ∈ s.direction ↔ p2 ∈ s :=
begin
rw mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub_right hp,
simp
end
/-- Given a point in an affine subspace, a result of subtracting that
point on the left is in the direction if and only if the other point
is in the subspace. -/
lemma vsub_left_mem_direction_iff_mem {s : affine_subspace k P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) (p2 : P) :
p -ᵥ p2 ∈ s.direction ↔ p2 ∈ s :=
begin
rw mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub_left hp,
simp
end
/-- Two affine subspaces are equal if they have the same points. -/
@[ext] lemma ext {s1 s2 : affine_subspace k P} (h : (s1 : set P) = s2) : s1 = s2 :=
begin
cases s1,
cases s2,
congr,
exact h
end
/-- Two affine subspaces with the same direction and nonempty
intersection are equal. -/
lemma ext_of_direction_eq {s1 s2 : affine_subspace k P} (hd : s1.direction = s2.direction)
(hn : ((s1 : set P) ∩ s2).nonempty) : s1 = s2 :=
begin
ext p,
have hq1 := set.mem_of_mem_inter_left hn.some_mem,
have hq2 := set.mem_of_mem_inter_right hn.some_mem,
split,
{ intro hp,
rw ←vsub_vadd p hn.some,
refine vadd_mem_of_mem_direction _ hq2,
rw ←hd,
exact vsub_mem_direction hp hq1 },
{ intro hp,
rw ←vsub_vadd p hn.some,
refine vadd_mem_of_mem_direction _ hq1,
rw hd,
exact vsub_mem_direction hp hq2 }
end
instance to_add_torsor (s : affine_subspace k P) [nonempty s] : add_torsor s.direction s :=
{ vadd := λ a b, ⟨(a:V) +ᵥ (b:P), vadd_mem_of_mem_direction a.2 b.2⟩,
zero_vadd := by simp,
add_vadd := λ a b c, by { ext, apply add_vadd },
vsub := λ a b, ⟨(a:P) -ᵥ (b:P), (vsub_left_mem_direction_iff_mem a.2 _).mpr b.2 ⟩,
nonempty := by apply_instance,
vsub_vadd' := λ a b, by { ext, apply add_torsor.vsub_vadd' },
vadd_vsub' := λ a b, by { ext, apply add_torsor.vadd_vsub' } }
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_vsub (s : affine_subspace k P) [nonempty s] (a b : s) :
↑(a -ᵥ b) = (a:P) -ᵥ (b:P) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_vadd (s : affine_subspace k P) [nonempty s] (a : s.direction) (b : s) :
↑(a +ᵥ b) = (a:V) +ᵥ (b:P) :=
rfl
/-- Two affine subspaces with nonempty intersection are equal if and
only if their directions are equal. -/
lemma eq_iff_direction_eq_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : affine_subspace k P} {p : P} (h₁ : p ∈ s₁)
(h₂ : p ∈ s₂) : s₁ = s₂ ↔ s₁.direction = s₂.direction :=
⟨λ h, h ▸ rfl, λ h, ext_of_direction_eq h ⟨p, h₁, h₂⟩⟩
/-- Construct an affine subspace from a point and a direction. -/
def mk' (p : P) (direction : submodule k V) : affine_subspace k P :=
{ carrier := {q | ∃ v ∈ direction, q = v +ᵥ p},
smul_vsub_vadd_mem := λ c p1 p2 p3 hp1 hp2 hp3, begin
rcases hp1 with ⟨v1, hv1, hp1⟩,
rcases hp2 with ⟨v2, hv2, hp2⟩,
rcases hp3 with ⟨v3, hv3, hp3⟩,
use [c • (v1 - v2) + v3,
direction.add_mem (direction.smul_mem c (direction.sub_mem hv1 hv2)) hv3],
simp [hp1, hp2, hp3, vadd_vadd]
end }
/-- An affine subspace constructed from a point and a direction contains
that point. -/
lemma self_mem_mk' (p : P) (direction : submodule k V) :
p ∈ mk' p direction :=
⟨0, ⟨direction.zero_mem, (zero_vadd _ _).symm⟩⟩
/-- An affine subspace constructed from a point and a direction contains
the result of adding a vector in that direction to that point. -/
lemma vadd_mem_mk' {v : V} (p : P) {direction : submodule k V} (hv : v ∈ direction) :
v +ᵥ p ∈ mk' p direction :=
⟨v, hv, rfl⟩
/-- An affine subspace constructed from a point and a direction is
nonempty. -/
lemma mk'_nonempty (p : P) (direction : submodule k V) : (mk' p direction : set P).nonempty :=
⟨p, self_mem_mk' p direction⟩
/-- The direction of an affine subspace constructed from a point and a
direction. -/
@[simp] lemma direction_mk' (p : P) (direction : submodule k V) :
(mk' p direction).direction = direction :=
begin
ext v,
rw mem_direction_iff_eq_vsub (mk'_nonempty _ _),
split,
{ rintros ⟨p1, ⟨v1, hv1, hp1⟩, p2, ⟨v2, hv2, hp2⟩, hv⟩,
rw [hv, hp1, hp2, vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_right],
exact direction.sub_mem hv1 hv2 },
{ exact λ hv, ⟨v +ᵥ p, vadd_mem_mk' _ hv, p,
self_mem_mk' _ _, (vadd_vsub _ _).symm⟩ }
end
/-- Constructing an affine subspace from a point in a subspace and
that subspace's direction yields the original subspace. -/
@[simp] lemma mk'_eq {s : affine_subspace k P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) : mk' p s.direction = s :=
ext_of_direction_eq (direction_mk' p s.direction)
⟨p, set.mem_inter (self_mem_mk' _ _) hp⟩
/-- If an affine subspace contains a set of points, it contains the
`span_points` of that set. -/
lemma span_points_subset_coe_of_subset_coe {s : set P} {s1 : affine_subspace k P} (h : s ⊆ s1) :
span_points k s ⊆ s1 :=
begin
rintros p ⟨p1, hp1, v, hv, hp⟩,
rw hp,
have hp1s1 : p1 ∈ (s1 : set P) := set.mem_of_mem_of_subset hp1 h,
refine vadd_mem_of_mem_direction _ hp1s1,
have hs : vector_span k s ≤ s1.direction := vector_span_mono k h,
rw set_like.le_def at hs,
rw ←set_like.mem_coe,
exact set.mem_of_mem_of_subset hv hs
end
end affine_subspace
section affine_span
variables (k : Type*) {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [ring k] [add_comm_group V] [module k V]
[affine_space V P]
include V
/-- The affine span of a set of points is the smallest affine subspace
containing those points. (Actually defined here in terms of spans in
modules.) -/
def affine_span (s : set P) : affine_subspace k P :=
{ carrier := span_points k s,
smul_vsub_vadd_mem := λ c p1 p2 p3 hp1 hp2 hp3,
vadd_mem_span_points_of_mem_span_points_of_mem_vector_span k hp3
((vector_span k s).smul_mem c
(vsub_mem_vector_span_of_mem_span_points_of_mem_span_points k hp1 hp2)) }
/-- The affine span, converted to a set, is `span_points`. -/
@[simp] lemma coe_affine_span (s : set P) :
(affine_span k s : set P) = span_points k s :=
rfl
/-- A set is contained in its affine span. -/
lemma subset_affine_span (s : set P) : s ⊆ affine_span k s :=
subset_span_points k s
/-- The direction of the affine span is the `vector_span`. -/
lemma direction_affine_span (s : set P) : (affine_span k s).direction = vector_span k s :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ refine submodule.span_le.2 _,
rintros v ⟨p1, p3, ⟨p2, hp2, v1, hv1, hp1⟩, ⟨p4, hp4, v2, hv2, hp3⟩, rfl⟩,
rw [hp1, hp3, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vadd_vsub_assoc, set_like.mem_coe],
exact (vector_span k s).sub_mem ((vector_span k s).add_mem hv1
(vsub_mem_vector_span k hp2 hp4)) hv2 },
{ exact vector_span_mono k (subset_span_points k s) }
end
/-- A point in a set is in its affine span. -/
lemma mem_affine_span {p : P} {s : set P} (hp : p ∈ s) : p ∈ affine_span k s :=
mem_span_points k p s hp
end affine_span
namespace affine_subspace
variables {k : Type*} {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [ring k] [add_comm_group V] [module k V]
[S : affine_space V P]
include S
instance : complete_lattice (affine_subspace k P) :=
{ sup := λ s1 s2, affine_span k (s1 ∪ s2),
le_sup_left := λ s1 s2, set.subset.trans (set.subset_union_left s1 s2)
(subset_span_points k _),
le_sup_right := λ s1 s2, set.subset.trans (set.subset_union_right s1 s2)
(subset_span_points k _),
sup_le := λ s1 s2 s3 hs1 hs2, span_points_subset_coe_of_subset_coe (set.union_subset hs1 hs2),
inf := λ s1 s2, mk (s1 ∩ s2)
(λ c p1 p2 p3 hp1 hp2 hp3,
⟨s1.smul_vsub_vadd_mem c hp1.1 hp2.1 hp3.1,
s2.smul_vsub_vadd_mem c hp1.2 hp2.2 hp3.2⟩),
inf_le_left := λ _ _, set.inter_subset_left _ _,
inf_le_right := λ _ _, set.inter_subset_right _ _,
le_inf := λ _ _ _, set.subset_inter,
top := { carrier := set.univ,
smul_vsub_vadd_mem := λ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, set.mem_univ _ },
le_top := λ _ _ _, set.mem_univ _,
bot := { carrier := ∅,
smul_vsub_vadd_mem := λ _ _ _ _, false.elim },
bot_le := λ _ _, false.elim,
Sup := λ s, affine_span k (⋃ s' ∈ s, (s' : set P)),
Inf := λ s, mk (⋂ s' ∈ s, (s' : set P))
(λ c p1 p2 p3 hp1 hp2 hp3, set.mem_bInter_iff.2 $ λ s2 hs2,
s2.smul_vsub_vadd_mem c (set.mem_bInter_iff.1 hp1 s2 hs2)
(set.mem_bInter_iff.1 hp2 s2 hs2)
(set.mem_bInter_iff.1 hp3 s2 hs2)),
le_Sup := λ _ _ h, set.subset.trans (set.subset_bUnion_of_mem h) (subset_span_points k _),
Sup_le := λ _ _ h, span_points_subset_coe_of_subset_coe (set.bUnion_subset h),
Inf_le := λ _ _, set.bInter_subset_of_mem,
le_Inf := λ _ _, set.subset_bInter,
.. partial_order.lift (coe : affine_subspace k P → set P) (λ _ _, ext) }
instance : inhabited (affine_subspace k P) := ⟨⊤⟩
/-- The `≤` order on subspaces is the same as that on the corresponding
sets. -/
lemma le_def (s1 s2 : affine_subspace k P) : s1 ≤ s2 ↔ (s1 : set P) ⊆ s2 :=
iff.rfl
/-- One subspace is less than or equal to another if and only if all
its points are in the second subspace. -/
lemma le_def' (s1 s2 : affine_subspace k P) : s1 ≤ s2 ↔ ∀ p ∈ s1, p ∈ s2 :=
iff.rfl
/-- The `<` order on subspaces is the same as that on the corresponding
sets. -/
lemma lt_def (s1 s2 : affine_subspace k P) : s1 < s2 ↔ (s1 : set P) ⊂ s2 :=
iff.rfl
/-- One subspace is not less than or equal to another if and only if
it has a point not in the second subspace. -/
lemma not_le_iff_exists (s1 s2 : affine_subspace k P) : ¬ s1 ≤ s2 ↔ ∃ p ∈ s1, p ∉ s2 :=
set.not_subset
/-- If a subspace is less than another, there is a point only in the
second. -/
lemma exists_of_lt {s1 s2 : affine_subspace k P} (h : s1 < s2) : ∃ p ∈ s2, p ∉ s1 :=
set.exists_of_ssubset h
/-- A subspace is less than another if and only if it is less than or
equal to the second subspace and there is a point only in the
second. -/
lemma lt_iff_le_and_exists (s1 s2 : affine_subspace k P) : s1 < s2 ↔ s1 ≤ s2 ∧ ∃ p ∈ s2, p ∉ s1 :=
by rw [lt_iff_le_not_le, not_le_iff_exists]
/-- If an affine subspace is nonempty and contained in another with
the same direction, they are equal. -/
lemma eq_of_direction_eq_of_nonempty_of_le {s₁ s₂ : affine_subspace k P}
(hd : s₁.direction = s₂.direction) (hn : (s₁ : set P).nonempty) (hle : s₁ ≤ s₂) :
s₁ = s₂ :=
let ⟨p, hp⟩ := hn in ext_of_direction_eq hd ⟨p, hp, hle hp⟩
variables (k V)
/-- The affine span is the `Inf` of subspaces containing the given
points. -/
lemma affine_span_eq_Inf (s : set P) : affine_span k s = Inf {s' | s ⊆ s'} :=
le_antisymm (span_points_subset_coe_of_subset_coe (set.subset_bInter (λ _ h, h)))
(Inf_le (subset_span_points k _))
variables (P)
/-- The Galois insertion formed by `affine_span` and coercion back to
a set. -/
protected def gi : galois_insertion (affine_span k) (coe : affine_subspace k P → set P) :=
{ choice := λ s _, affine_span k s,
gc := λ s1 s2, ⟨λ h, set.subset.trans (subset_span_points k s1) h,
span_points_subset_coe_of_subset_coe⟩,
le_l_u := λ _, subset_span_points k _,
choice_eq := λ _ _, rfl }
/-- The span of the empty set is `⊥`. -/
@[simp] lemma span_empty : affine_span k (∅ : set P) = ⊥ :=
(affine_subspace.gi k V P).gc.l_bot
/-- The span of `univ` is `⊤`. -/
@[simp] lemma span_univ : affine_span k (set.univ : set P) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 $ subset_span_points k _
variables {P}
/-- The affine span of a single point, coerced to a set, contains just
that point. -/
@[simp] lemma coe_affine_span_singleton (p : P) : (affine_span k ({p} : set P) : set P) = {p} :=
begin
ext x,
rw [mem_coe, ←vsub_right_mem_direction_iff_mem (mem_affine_span k (set.mem_singleton p)) _,
direction_affine_span],
simp
end
/-- A point is in the affine span of a single point if and only if
they are equal. -/
@[simp] lemma mem_affine_span_singleton (p1 p2 : P) :
p1 ∈ affine_span k ({p2} : set P) ↔ p1 = p2 :=
by simp [←mem_coe]
/-- The span of a union of sets is the sup of their spans. -/
lemma span_union (s t : set P) : affine_span k (s ∪ t) = affine_span k s ⊔ affine_span k t :=
(affine_subspace.gi k V P).gc.l_sup
/-- The span of a union of an indexed family of sets is the sup of
their spans. -/
lemma span_Union {ι : Type*} (s : ι → set P) :
affine_span k (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, affine_span k (s i) :=
(affine_subspace.gi k V P).gc.l_supr
variables (P)
/-- `⊤`, coerced to a set, is the whole set of points. -/
@[simp] lemma top_coe : ((⊤ : affine_subspace k P) : set P) = set.univ :=
rfl
variables {P}
/-- All points are in `⊤`. -/
lemma mem_top (p : P) : p ∈ (⊤ : affine_subspace k P) :=
set.mem_univ p
variables (P)
/-- The direction of `⊤` is the whole module as a submodule. -/
@[simp] lemma direction_top : (⊤ : affine_subspace k P).direction = ⊤ :=
begin
cases S.nonempty with p,
ext v,
refine ⟨imp_intro submodule.mem_top, λ hv, _⟩,
have hpv : (v +ᵥ p -ᵥ p : V) ∈ (⊤ : affine_subspace k P).direction :=
vsub_mem_direction (mem_top k V _) (mem_top k V _),
rwa vadd_vsub at hpv
end
/-- `⊥`, coerced to a set, is the empty set. -/
@[simp] lemma bot_coe : ((⊥ : affine_subspace k P) : set P) = ∅ :=
rfl
variables {P}
/-- No points are in `⊥`. -/
lemma not_mem_bot (p : P) : p ∉ (⊥ : affine_subspace k P) :=
set.not_mem_empty p
variables (P)
/-- The direction of `⊥` is the submodule `⊥`. -/
@[simp] lemma direction_bot : (⊥ : affine_subspace k P).direction = ⊥ :=
by rw [direction_eq_vector_span, bot_coe, vector_span_def, vsub_empty, submodule.span_empty]
variables {k V P}
/-- A nonempty affine subspace is `⊤` if and only if its direction is
`⊤`. -/
@[simp] lemma direction_eq_top_iff_of_nonempty {s : affine_subspace k P}
(h : (s : set P).nonempty) : s.direction = ⊤ ↔ s = ⊤ :=
begin
split,
{ intro hd,
rw ←direction_top k V P at hd,
refine ext_of_direction_eq hd _,
simp [h] },
{ rintro rfl,
simp }
end
/-- The inf of two affine subspaces, coerced to a set, is the
intersection of the two sets of points. -/
@[simp] lemma inf_coe (s1 s2 : affine_subspace k P) : ((s1 ⊓ s2) : set P) = s1 ∩ s2 :=
rfl
/-- A point is in the inf of two affine subspaces if and only if it is
in both of them. -/
lemma mem_inf_iff (p : P) (s1 s2 : affine_subspace k P) : p ∈ s1 ⊓ s2 ↔ p ∈ s1 ∧ p ∈ s2 :=
iff.rfl
/-- The direction of the inf of two affine subspaces is less than or
equal to the inf of their directions. -/
lemma direction_inf (s1 s2 : affine_subspace k P) :
(s1 ⊓ s2).direction ≤ s1.direction ⊓ s2.direction :=
begin
repeat { rw [direction_eq_vector_span, vector_span_def] },
exact le_inf
(Inf_le_Inf (λ p hp, trans (vsub_self_mono (inter_subset_left _ _)) hp))
(Inf_le_Inf (λ p hp, trans (vsub_self_mono (inter_subset_right _ _)) hp))
end
/-- If two affine subspaces have a point in common, the direction of
their inf equals the inf of their directions. -/
lemma direction_inf_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : affine_subspace k P} {p : P} (h₁ : p ∈ s₁) (h₂ : p ∈ s₂) :
(s₁ ⊓ s₂).direction = s₁.direction ⊓ s₂.direction :=
begin
ext v,
rw [submodule.mem_inf, ←vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction v h₁, ←vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction v h₂,
←vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction v ((mem_inf_iff p s₁ s₂).2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩), mem_inf_iff]
end
/-- If two affine subspaces have a point in their inf, the direction
of their inf equals the inf of their directions. -/
lemma direction_inf_of_mem_inf {s₁ s₂ : affine_subspace k P} {p : P} (h : p ∈ s₁ ⊓ s₂) :
(s₁ ⊓ s₂).direction = s₁.direction ⊓ s₂.direction :=
direction_inf_of_mem ((mem_inf_iff p s₁ s₂).1 h).1 ((mem_inf_iff p s₁ s₂).1 h).2
/-- If one affine subspace is less than or equal to another, the same
applies to their directions. -/
lemma direction_le {s1 s2 : affine_subspace k P} (h : s1 ≤ s2) : s1.direction ≤ s2.direction :=
begin
repeat { rw [direction_eq_vector_span, vector_span_def] },
exact vector_span_mono k h
end
/-- If one nonempty affine subspace is less than another, the same
applies to their directions -/
lemma direction_lt_of_nonempty {s1 s2 : affine_subspace k P} (h : s1 < s2)
(hn : (s1 : set P).nonempty) : s1.direction < s2.direction :=
begin
cases hn with p hp,
rw lt_iff_le_and_exists at h,
rcases h with ⟨hle, p2, hp2, hp2s1⟩,
rw set_like.lt_iff_le_and_exists,
use [direction_le hle, p2 -ᵥ p, vsub_mem_direction hp2 (hle hp)],
intro hm,
rw vsub_right_mem_direction_iff_mem hp p2 at hm,
exact hp2s1 hm
end
/-- The sup of the directions of two affine subspaces is less than or
equal to the direction of their sup. -/
lemma sup_direction_le (s1 s2 : affine_subspace k P) :
s1.direction ⊔ s2.direction ≤ (s1 ⊔ s2).direction :=
begin
repeat { rw [direction_eq_vector_span, vector_span_def] },
exact sup_le
(Inf_le_Inf (λ p hp, set.subset.trans (vsub_self_mono (le_sup_left : s1 ≤ s1 ⊔ s2)) hp))
(Inf_le_Inf (λ p hp, set.subset.trans (vsub_self_mono (le_sup_right : s2 ≤ s1 ⊔ s2)) hp))
end
/-- The sup of the directions of two nonempty affine subspaces with
empty intersection is less than the direction of their sup. -/
lemma sup_direction_lt_of_nonempty_of_inter_empty {s1 s2 : affine_subspace k P}
(h1 : (s1 : set P).nonempty) (h2 : (s2 : set P).nonempty) (he : (s1 ∩ s2 : set P) = ∅) :
s1.direction ⊔ s2.direction < (s1 ⊔ s2).direction :=
begin
cases h1 with p1 hp1,
cases h2 with p2 hp2,
rw set_like.lt_iff_le_and_exists,
use [sup_direction_le s1 s2, p2 -ᵥ p1,
vsub_mem_direction ((le_sup_right : s2 ≤ s1 ⊔ s2) hp2) ((le_sup_left : s1 ≤ s1 ⊔ s2) hp1)],
intro h,
rw submodule.mem_sup at h,
rcases h with ⟨v1, hv1, v2, hv2, hv1v2⟩,
rw [←sub_eq_zero, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, add_comm v1, add_assoc,
←vadd_vsub_assoc, ←neg_neg v2, add_comm, ←sub_eq_add_neg, ←vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub,
vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at hv1v2,
refine set.nonempty.ne_empty _ he,
use [v1 +ᵥ p1, vadd_mem_of_mem_direction hv1 hp1],
rw hv1v2,
exact vadd_mem_of_mem_direction (submodule.neg_mem _ hv2) hp2
end
/-- If the directions of two nonempty affine subspaces span the whole
module, they have nonempty intersection. -/
lemma inter_nonempty_of_nonempty_of_sup_direction_eq_top {s1 s2 : affine_subspace k P}
(h1 : (s1 : set P).nonempty) (h2 : (s2 : set P).nonempty)
(hd : s1.direction ⊔ s2.direction = ⊤) : ((s1 : set P) ∩ s2).nonempty :=
begin
by_contradiction h,
rw set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty at h,
have hlt := sup_direction_lt_of_nonempty_of_inter_empty h1 h2 h,
rw hd at hlt,
exact not_top_lt hlt
end
/-- If the directions of two nonempty affine subspaces are complements
of each other, they intersect in exactly one point. -/
lemma inter_eq_singleton_of_nonempty_of_is_compl {s1 s2 : affine_subspace k P}
(h1 : (s1 : set P).nonempty) (h2 : (s2 : set P).nonempty)
(hd : is_compl s1.direction s2.direction) : ∃ p, (s1 : set P) ∩ s2 = {p} :=
begin
cases inter_nonempty_of_nonempty_of_sup_direction_eq_top h1 h2 hd.sup_eq_top with p hp,
use p,
ext q,
rw set.mem_singleton_iff,
split,
{ rintros ⟨hq1, hq2⟩,
have hqp : q -ᵥ p ∈ s1.direction ⊓ s2.direction :=
⟨vsub_mem_direction hq1 hp.1, vsub_mem_direction hq2 hp.2⟩,
rwa [hd.inf_eq_bot, submodule.mem_bot, vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at hqp },
{ exact λ h, h.symm ▸ hp }
end
/-- Coercing a subspace to a set then taking the affine span produces
the original subspace. -/
@[simp] lemma affine_span_coe (s : affine_subspace k P) : affine_span k (s : set P) = s :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ (subset_span_points _ _),
rintros p ⟨p1, hp1, v, hv, rfl⟩,
exact vadd_mem_of_mem_direction hv hp1
end
end affine_subspace
section affine_space'
variables (k : Type*) {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [ring k] [add_comm_group V] [module k V]
[affine_space V P]
variables {ι : Type*}
include V
open affine_subspace set
/-- The `vector_span` is the span of the pairwise subtractions with a
given point on the left. -/
lemma vector_span_eq_span_vsub_set_left {s : set P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) :
vector_span k s = submodule.span k ((-ᵥ) p '' s) :=
begin
rw vector_span_def,
refine le_antisymm _ (submodule.span_mono _),
{ rw submodule.span_le,
rintros v ⟨p1, p2, hp1, hp2, hv⟩,
rw ←vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p1 p2 p at hv,
rw [←hv, set_like.mem_coe, submodule.mem_span],
exact λ m hm, submodule.sub_mem _ (hm ⟨p2, hp2, rfl⟩) (hm ⟨p1, hp1, rfl⟩) },
{ rintros v ⟨p2, hp2, hv⟩,
exact ⟨p, p2, hp, hp2, hv⟩ }
end
/-- The `vector_span` is the span of the pairwise subtractions with a
given point on the right. -/
lemma vector_span_eq_span_vsub_set_right {s : set P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) :
vector_span k s = submodule.span k ((-ᵥ p) '' s) :=
begin
rw vector_span_def,
refine le_antisymm _ (submodule.span_mono _),
{ rw submodule.span_le,
rintros v ⟨p1, p2, hp1, hp2, hv⟩,
rw ←vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right p1 p2 p at hv,
rw [←hv, set_like.mem_coe, submodule.mem_span],
exact λ m hm, submodule.sub_mem _ (hm ⟨p1, hp1, rfl⟩) (hm ⟨p2, hp2, rfl⟩) },
{ rintros v ⟨p2, hp2, hv⟩,
exact ⟨p2, p, hp2, hp, hv⟩ }
end
/-- The `vector_span` is the span of the pairwise subtractions with a
given point on the left, excluding the subtraction of that point from
itself. -/
lemma vector_span_eq_span_vsub_set_left_ne {s : set P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) :
vector_span k s = submodule.span k ((-ᵥ) p '' (s \ {p})) :=
begin
conv_lhs { rw [vector_span_eq_span_vsub_set_left k hp, ←set.insert_eq_of_mem hp,
←set.insert_diff_singleton, set.image_insert_eq] },
simp [submodule.span_insert_eq_span]
end
/-- The `vector_span` is the span of the pairwise subtractions with a
given point on the right, excluding the subtraction of that point from
itself. -/
lemma vector_span_eq_span_vsub_set_right_ne {s : set P} {p : P} (hp : p ∈ s) :
vector_span k s = submodule.span k ((-ᵥ p) '' (s \ {p})) :=
begin
conv_lhs { rw [vector_span_eq_span_vsub_set_right k hp, ←set.insert_eq_of_mem hp,
←set.insert_diff_singleton, set.image_insert_eq] },
simp [submodule.span_insert_eq_span]
end
/-- The `vector_span` of the image of a function is the span of the
pairwise subtractions with a given point on the left, excluding the
subtraction of that point from itself. -/
lemma vector_span_image_eq_span_vsub_set_left_ne (p : ι → P) {s : set ι} {i : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) :
vector_span k (p '' s) = submodule.span k ((-ᵥ) (p i) '' (p '' (s \ {i}))) :=
begin
conv_lhs { rw [vector_span_eq_span_vsub_set_left k (set.mem_image_of_mem p hi),
←set.insert_eq_of_mem hi, ←set.insert_diff_singleton, set.image_insert_eq,
set.image_insert_eq] },
simp [submodule.span_insert_eq_span]
end
/-- The `vector_span` of the image of a function is the span of the
pairwise subtractions with a given point on the right, excluding the
subtraction of that point from itself. -/
lemma vector_span_image_eq_span_vsub_set_right_ne (p : ι → P) {s : set ι} {i : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) :
vector_span k (p '' s) = submodule.span k ((-ᵥ (p i)) '' (p '' (s \ {i}))) :=
begin
conv_lhs { rw [vector_span_eq_span_vsub_set_right k (set.mem_image_of_mem p hi),
←set.insert_eq_of_mem hi, ←set.insert_diff_singleton, set.image_insert_eq,
set.image_insert_eq] },
simp [submodule.span_insert_eq_span]
end
/-- The `vector_span` of an indexed family is the span of the pairwise
subtractions with a given point on the left. -/
lemma vector_span_range_eq_span_range_vsub_left (p : ι → P) (i0 : ι) :
vector_span k (set.range p) = submodule.span k (set.range (λ (i : ι), p i0 -ᵥ p i)) :=
by rw [vector_span_eq_span_vsub_set_left k (set.mem_range_self i0), ←set.range_comp]
/-- The `vector_span` of an indexed family is the span of the pairwise
subtractions with a given point on the right. -/
lemma vector_span_range_eq_span_range_vsub_right (p : ι → P) (i0 : ι) :
vector_span k (set.range p) = submodule.span k (set.range (λ (i : ι), p i -ᵥ p i0)) :=
by rw [vector_span_eq_span_vsub_set_right k (set.mem_range_self i0), ←set.range_comp]
/-- The `vector_span` of an indexed family is the span of the pairwise
subtractions with a given point on the left, excluding the subtraction
of that point from itself. -/
lemma vector_span_range_eq_span_range_vsub_left_ne (p : ι → P) (i₀ : ι) :
vector_span k (set.range p) = submodule.span k (set.range (λ (i : {x // x ≠ i₀}), p i₀ -ᵥ p i)) :=
begin
rw [←set.image_univ, vector_span_image_eq_span_vsub_set_left_ne k _ (set.mem_univ i₀)],
congr' with v,
simp only [set.mem_range, set.mem_image, set.mem_diff, set.mem_singleton_iff, subtype.exists,
subtype.coe_mk],
split,
{ rintros ⟨x, ⟨i₁, ⟨⟨hi₁u, hi₁⟩, rfl⟩⟩, hv⟩,
exact ⟨i₁, hi₁, hv⟩ },
{ exact λ ⟨i₁, hi₁, hv⟩, ⟨p i₁, ⟨i₁, ⟨set.mem_univ _, hi₁⟩, rfl⟩, hv⟩ }
end
/-- The `vector_span` of an indexed family is the span of the pairwise
subtractions with a given point on the right, excluding the subtraction
of that point from itself. -/
lemma vector_span_range_eq_span_range_vsub_right_ne (p : ι → P) (i₀ : ι) :
vector_span k (set.range p) = submodule.span k (set.range (λ (i : {x // x ≠ i₀}), p i -ᵥ p i₀)) :=
begin
rw [←set.image_univ, vector_span_image_eq_span_vsub_set_right_ne k _ (set.mem_univ i₀)],
congr' with v,
simp only [set.mem_range, set.mem_image, set.mem_diff, set.mem_singleton_iff, subtype.exists,
subtype.coe_mk],
split,
{ rintros ⟨x, ⟨i₁, ⟨⟨hi₁u, hi₁⟩, rfl⟩⟩, hv⟩,
exact ⟨i₁, hi₁, hv⟩ },
{ exact λ ⟨i₁, hi₁, hv⟩, ⟨p i₁, ⟨i₁, ⟨set.mem_univ _, hi₁⟩, rfl⟩, hv⟩ }
end
/-- The affine span of a set is nonempty if and only if that set
is. -/
lemma affine_span_nonempty (s : set P) :
(affine_span k s : set P).nonempty ↔ s.nonempty :=
span_points_nonempty k s
/-- The affine span of a nonempty set is nonempty. -/
instance {s : set P} [nonempty s] : nonempty (affine_span k s) :=
((affine_span_nonempty k s).mpr (nonempty_subtype.mp ‹_›)).to_subtype
variables {k}
/-- Suppose a set of vectors spans `V`. Then a point `p`, together
with those vectors added to `p`, spans `P`. -/
lemma affine_span_singleton_union_vadd_eq_top_of_span_eq_top {s : set V} (p : P)
(h : submodule.span k (set.range (coe : s → V)) = ⊤) :
affine_span k ({p} ∪ (λ v, v +ᵥ p) '' s) = ⊤ :=
begin
convert ext_of_direction_eq _
⟨p,
mem_affine_span k (set.mem_union_left _ (set.mem_singleton _)),
mem_top k V p⟩,
rw [direction_affine_span, direction_top,
vector_span_eq_span_vsub_set_right k
((set.mem_union_left _ (set.mem_singleton _)) : p ∈ _), eq_top_iff, ←h],
apply submodule.span_mono,
rintros v ⟨v', rfl⟩,
use (v' : V) +ᵥ p,
simp
end
variables (k)
/-- `affine_span` is monotone. -/
lemma affine_span_mono {s₁ s₂ : set P} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : affine_span k s₁ ≤ affine_span k s₂ :=
span_points_subset_coe_of_subset_coe (set.subset.trans h (subset_affine_span k _))
/-- Taking the affine span of a set, adding a point and taking the
span again produces the same results as adding the point to the set
and taking the span. -/
lemma affine_span_insert_affine_span (p : P) (ps : set P) :
affine_span k (insert p (affine_span k ps : set P)) = affine_span k (insert p ps) :=
by rw [set.insert_eq, set.insert_eq, span_union, span_union, affine_span_coe]
/-- If a point is in the affine span of a set, adding it to that set
does not change the affine span. -/
lemma affine_span_insert_eq_affine_span {p : P} {ps : set P} (h : p ∈ affine_span k ps) :
affine_span k (insert p ps) = affine_span k ps :=
begin
rw ←mem_coe at h,
rw [←affine_span_insert_affine_span, set.insert_eq_of_mem h, affine_span_coe]
end
end affine_space'
namespace affine_subspace
variables {k : Type*} {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [ring k] [add_comm_group V] [module k V]
[affine_space V P]
include V
/-- The direction of the sup of two nonempty affine subspaces is the
sup of the two directions and of any one difference between points in
the two subspaces. -/
lemma direction_sup {s1 s2 : affine_subspace k P} {p1 p2 : P} (hp1 : p1 ∈ s1) (hp2 : p2 ∈ s2) :
(s1 ⊔ s2).direction = s1.direction ⊔ s2.direction ⊔ k ∙ (p2 -ᵥ p1) :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ _,
{ change (affine_span k ((s1 : set P) ∪ s2)).direction ≤ _,
rw ←mem_coe at hp1,
rw [direction_affine_span, vector_span_eq_span_vsub_set_right k (set.mem_union_left _ hp1),
submodule.span_le],
rintros v ⟨p3, hp3, rfl⟩,
cases hp3,
{ rw [sup_assoc, sup_comm, set_like.mem_coe, submodule.mem_sup],
use [0, submodule.zero_mem _, p3 -ᵥ p1, vsub_mem_direction hp3 hp1],
rw zero_add },
{ rw [sup_assoc, set_like.mem_coe, submodule.mem_sup],
use [0, submodule.zero_mem _, p3 -ᵥ p1],
rw [and_comm, zero_add],
use rfl,
rw [←vsub_add_vsub_cancel p3 p2 p1, submodule.mem_sup],
use [p3 -ᵥ p2, vsub_mem_direction hp3 hp2, p2 -ᵥ p1,
submodule.mem_span_singleton_self _] } },
{ refine sup_le (sup_direction_le _ _) _,
rw [direction_eq_vector_span, vector_span_def],
exact Inf_le_Inf (λ p hp, set.subset.trans
(set.singleton_subset_iff.2
(vsub_mem_vsub (mem_span_points k p2 _ (set.mem_union_right _ hp2))
(mem_span_points k p1 _ (set.mem_union_left _ hp1))))
hp) }
end
/-- The direction of the span of the result of adding a point to a
nonempty affine subspace is the sup of the direction of that subspace
and of any one difference between that point and a point in the
subspace. -/
lemma direction_affine_span_insert {s : affine_subspace k P} {p1 p2 : P} (hp1 : p1 ∈ s) :
(affine_span k (insert p2 (s : set P))).direction = submodule.span k {p2 -ᵥ p1} ⊔ s.direction :=
begin
rw [sup_comm, ←set.union_singleton, ←coe_affine_span_singleton k V p2],
change (s ⊔ affine_span k {p2}).direction = _,
rw [direction_sup hp1 (mem_affine_span k (set.mem_singleton _)), direction_affine_span],
simp
end
/-- Given a point `p1` in an affine subspace `s`, and a point `p2`, a
point `p` is in the span of `s` with `p2` added if and only if it is a
multiple of `p2 -ᵥ p1` added to a point in `s`. -/
lemma mem_affine_span_insert_iff {s : affine_subspace k P} {p1 : P} (hp1 : p1 ∈ s) (p2 p : P) :
p ∈ affine_span k (insert p2 (s : set P)) ↔
∃ (r : k) (p0 : P) (hp0 : p0 ∈ s), p = r • (p2 -ᵥ p1 : V) +ᵥ p0 :=
begin
rw ←mem_coe at hp1,
rw [←vsub_right_mem_direction_iff_mem (mem_affine_span k (set.mem_insert_of_mem _ hp1)),
direction_affine_span_insert hp1, submodule.mem_sup],
split,
{ rintros ⟨v1, hv1, v2, hv2, hp⟩,
rw submodule.mem_span_singleton at hv1,
rcases hv1 with ⟨r, rfl⟩,
use [r, v2 +ᵥ p1, vadd_mem_of_mem_direction hv2 hp1],
symmetry' at hp,
rw [←sub_eq_zero, ←vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at hp,
rw [hp, vadd_vadd] },
{ rintros ⟨r, p3, hp3, rfl⟩,
use [r • (p2 -ᵥ p1), submodule.mem_span_singleton.2 ⟨r, rfl⟩, p3 -ᵥ p1,
vsub_mem_direction hp3 hp1],
rw [vadd_vsub_assoc, add_comm] }
end
end affine_subspace
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.